No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993/04/21 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEEI'1NG8 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. Apri121, 1993 Civic Center Counts] Chtunbera 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 *~s City Councilmembera Dennis L. Stout, Mayar William J. Alexander, Councilmember Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember •~~ Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra d. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 PAGE City Council Agenda April 21, 1993 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p. m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CAL! TO ORDER i. Roll Ca!I: &xt~p?_, PJexander_,Staut _, Williams _, and Gufiertez_ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATION 1. Presentation of Proclamation recogn¢ing the first week of MaY as 'Blue Ribbon Week," 2. Presentation of Proclamation to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 to 9 year-old Girls All-Star Basketball Team for Winning the Southern CalROmip Municipal Athletic Federation Championship C COMMUNICATIONS FROM TH P 8 I This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any Issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar Items ere expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 2. Approval of Minutes: March 24, 1993 3. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 3/24/93, 3/31/93, and 4/7/93: 1 and Payroll endiny 3/25/93 for the total amount of S 1.726,594.64, 4. Approval to receive ona file current Investment Schedule os of 13 March 31, 1993. PAGE City Council Agenda ~ p,`~(~ April 21, 1993 ~--+-~tJ--r 2 S. Approval of the Community Services DepOr}ment Revised 17 Scholarsnip Polloy as recommended by the Park and Recreation Commission, 6. Approval to extend Comcast Cable T,V.'s franchise. 25 RESOLU-ON NO. 91-012L Z6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE C!TV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. EXTENDING CCUNN OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH C061CAST CABLE T.V. FCR 90 DAVS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 7. Approval to destroy records antl dOCUments which are no longer 27 required as provided under Government Code Section 34090. RESOLUTION NO. 93-081 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITV RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 340U B. Approval ro adopt a resolution to enter into please/purchase 33 agreement with Municipal Services Group. Incorporated. RESOLUTION N0.93-087- 34 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORZING THF. LEASE/PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT THROUGH MUNICIPAL SERVICES GROUP. INCORPORATED 9. Approval of o loan transaction with the Rancho Cucamonga 36 Redevelopment Agency. 10. Approval of Declorotion of Roadway Easement for APN iC62-071- 37 08, 5702 Amethyst Avenue. the former sight of the Ledig House. l I. Approval to Releose o Real Property Improvement Contract and 39 Lien Agreement for Street Improvements antl Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for Otf- Site Improvements on Almond S}reei, submitted by Randolph Scot Davis and Sondra Pauline Dovis. PAGE City Council Agenda April 27, 1993 3 RESOLUTION NO. 93-083 40 A RESOLU i ION OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CrIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RANDOLPH SCOT DAVIS AND SANDRA PAULINE DAVIS RESOLUTION N0.93-084 41 A RESOLUTION OF rHE CITY COUNCI! OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ACCEP-NG A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RANDOLPH SCOT DAVIS AND SANDRA PAULINE DAVIS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THF. SAME 12. Approval of the Engineers Report for the refunding of Assessment 43 District 8rPD. RESOLUTION N0.93-C85 44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REFUNDING AND REASSESSMENT REPORT OF ENGINEER AND CONFIRMING REASSESSMENTS FOR REFUNDING BONDS IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 13. Approval of a Resolution making award for sale of refunding 47 bonds. RESOLUTION N0.93-086 48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AWARD FOR SALE OF R"eFUNDING BONDS AND PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A REDEMPTION FUND 14. Approval of Leiter Agreement (CO 93-028) between the City of 50 Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Professional Boseba0 Ciub which provides for a temporary parking lot for patrons of the 9uakes baseball games. PAGE City Council Agenda April 21, 1993 4 15. Approval to oward and authorization to execute Ccntraci (CO 93- 53 029) for Milliken Avenue Bike Roue and Base Line Rood Bike Lone Phase 1 Improvement Project, for the amount of 517.200.00 (515.637.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded from Administrative Air 9uclity Improvement Grant Fund, Account NO. 14.41598, 16. Approval to oward and authorization to execute Contract (CO 93- 55 030) for construction of Seventh Street Improvements, between Havon Avenue and Center Avenue fo C.P. Construction Company. Incorporated, for the amount of S 167,750.00 (S 752500.00 pWS 10% contingency), to be funded from Furd 9 Gas Tax Account Number 09-4637-9223 and Fund 83, Assessment District 82- 1 R, Account Number 83-4637-6028. 17. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement 62 Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit for Tract 13280, located north of Base line Rocd between Milliken and Rochester Avenues, submitted by PGI No. 38 and Release of previously submittetl Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cosh Deposit accepted by Ctty Council on November 15. 1989 rnd July 18, 1990 respectively, from the Lusk Company. RESOLUTION N0.93087 63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUP;MONGA, C,vLIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 13280 AND RELEASING THE PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECIRITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT 18. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 65 Tract 14121, located on t he southwest Corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue, submitted by J.P. Rhoades Development. 67 RESOLUTION NC. 93-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA! IFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14121 PAQE City Couneil Agenda ` ~-+-, ~ ~ ~(~ April 21, 1993 5 19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 68 Tract 14486. located on the north sitle of Arrow Route behveen Archibald Avenue and Hermoso Avenue. submitteC by Cedar Villos. RESOLUTION NO. 93-089 71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION ANC IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14486 20. Approval of P:eliminary ReFOrt and Setting Public Hearings of May 72 19, 1993 and June 16, 1993, to levy the annuol ossessments and approve the Engineer's Report for Pork and Recreofion Improvement District (PD-85). RESOLU110N NO. 93-090 74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEW AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972: AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING 09JECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 93-091 76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR THE PARK AND RECTiEATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-85) 21. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting Public 85 Hearings for May 10, 1993 and Juno 16, 1993, to levy the onnuol assessments antl approve the Engineer's Reports for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4.5, 5.7, and 8. PAGE City Council Agenda April 21, 1993 6 RESOLUTION N0.93-092 87 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEW AND CCILECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING rviAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2. 3. 4, 5, b, 7 AND 8, fOR THE FISCAL VEAR 1993/94 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972: AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLU110N NO. 93-093 89 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI1V COUNCIL OF rHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARV APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET L'GHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1.2.3.4, S, b, 7 AND 8 22. Approval of Preliminary Engineer's Reports and Setting Publlc 126 Hearings for May 19, 1993 and June Ib. 1993, fo levy the annual assessments and approve the Engineer's Reports for Lontlscape Maintenance Disfncfs Nos. 1.2, 3A. 3B. 4, 5.6.7 and 8, RESOLUTION N0.93-094 128 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEW AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WTHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2. 3A, 3B, 4, 5, b. 7 AND 8. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACi OF 1972: AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO RESOLUTON N0.93-695 130 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITV COUNCIL OF THE CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. OF PRELIMINARV APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DI3TRICT5 NOS. 1, 2.3A, 38, 4 5, 6.7 AND B PAGE City Council Agenda April 21, 1993 7 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine antl noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submdied. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised andlor posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair wi!I open the meeting to receive public testimony. 1. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 174 D OPM NT R VI W 98 5 - K & K -O FIN IN - - An appeal of a Condition of Approval imposed by the Planning Commission requiring o storm drain in conjunction wdh a request }o construct a golf training facility, consisting of o tlriving range, putting green, chipping area, clubhouse, and mainiendnce building, in the General Industrial Designation rSuborea P) of the Industrial Area Specifc Plan, located or. the nonh side of Arrow Route, east of Milliken Avenue -APN: 229-011-24. RESOLUTION NO. 93-096 220 A RESOLUTION OF THE CfTV COUNCIL OF THE Cf1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 93-05, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A GOLF TRAINING 'rACILITV, CONSISTING OP A, DRIVING RANGE, PUTTING GREEN. CHIPPING AREA, CLUBHOUSE, AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, IN THE GENERAL !NDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 8) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 229.011-24 PAGE City Council Agentla April 21, 1993 8 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. i. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND CHAPTER 3.08 OF THE MUN'GIPAL CODE 223 TO ALL DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL BV APPLICANTS ORDINANCE NO. 511 (!first reading) 224 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIiY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMCNGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 308,090 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BV ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 3.08.090 (G) PERTAINING TO DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL BV AN APPLICANT H CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair mey open the meeting for public input. No hams Submitted, I COUNCIL BUSINESS The following Items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE REPORT FROM THE DAV LABORER SUBCOMMITTEE 225 2, DISCUSSION OF THE CITY'S CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE 230 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES AND NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES ORGANIZATIONS PAG E City Council Agenda `--ui~ April 21, 1943 9 •I IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR N XT ME Ih This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be tliscussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE ollwl It• This Is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the Clty Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Clty Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per Individual. 1, REQUEST BY A4SIC CAB OMPANV TO DIS IeR NFO M NT OF 237 TAXI ORDINAN ~f L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PERSONNEL MATTERS AND LITIGATION, RANCHO CUCAMONGA V PETERSON. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of iha City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby cenify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 15. 7993, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. March 24, 1993 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES A- CiT.. TO ORTee An adjourned meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, March. 24, 1993, in the Tri Communities Conference Room located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 6:OS p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembe es: Charles J. Buquet II, William J. Alexander, Diane Williams, Rex Gutierrez, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present we xe: Jack Lam, City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputty City Manager; Linda C, Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Manager; RicV. Gomez, Community Development Director; Tarry Smith, Park Planning/Development Superintendent; • Karen Emery, A990ciate Park Planner; Brad Buller, City Planner; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Bob Dominguez, Admin ist native Se rvicea Director; Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manage c; Kathy Scott, Administ native Secretary; Captain Bruce 2einer, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Diane O~Nea 1, Management Analyst Ii. Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I, and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B1. DISCUS SICN OF CITY LIBRARY OPTIONS Sack Lam, City Manager, introduced the item and stated the subconenit tee wanted to update the entice City Council on what they have been discussing and to get direction. for an interim library location. He, at this point, turned the meeting over to Suzanne Ot a, Community Services Managez. Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager, presented staff report and slide presentation of r, he three potential sites for an interim library location. Suzanne adtled staff is asking for direction on this matter as to tow to proceed. Councilmember. GuC lecrez asked about uses for the historical sites after the library use is completed. O City Council Minutes March 24, 1993 Page 2 Suzanne Ot a, Community Se xvices Manager, stated one possibility is a senior citizen complex with cortvne rc isl uses to support this. Maycr Stout stated the ze are two paths the City Council can take. He stated there are two locations with an adaptive reuse for the historical sites, and one newer building which would require tenant improvements. He mentioned the historical sites would take a longer period of time and possibly a lot more expense to get these ready fora 116ra ry use. Councilmember Williams stated she felt preserving historical things was imFO rt ant, but also felt time was of the essence for this project. Jack Lam, City Ma nage r, commented roar staff is in negotiations with the County on taking over the library. He added that what the state may take away f com special districts is also something to consider. He stzted something needs to be done for an interim site regardless of what the Council will do. Councilmember Ale xandee felt something needed to be done as quickly as possible. He felt th=_ location was very important, Cut felt the ultimate location should be Central Park. He felt the Laurel/Aspen site would be a good investment for the CSty. . Councilmember Buquet stated he wanted to make sure there is adequate funding no matter what the City Council decides. He agreed with Councilmember Alexander that Central Park should be the ultimate location. He stated he did not want the City to ceea[e Che same library situation they nave now. He felt the City needed to take care of the state budget crisis first. Mayor Stout stated the subrommit tea wants staff to give options as funds are available so the Council will know how much the total cost will be in order for further direction to be given to staff. He inquired if the Council preferred a historical re-adaptive site needing more improvements and something Ghat would take longer to get ready for use, rather than the site that could be completed sooner which did not need as much construction. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt the easy, low cost transition would be better antl stated he favored the Laurel/Aspen site until the Cenezal Park location could be accomplished. He felt it would be centralized in the City and near City Ha11. Mayor Stout stated he felt there should be a prioeity list of a!terna[ives developed and for the City to take the best one. He stated he likes ene adaptive re-use projects, but felt the newer building would be the best for an interim site until Central Pa ek could be built. Coun rilme mbec Buquet stated the reason the City is at this point is because the Cou ncy is not responsible. He felt the quickest and easiest site to get • into would be the best to work towards. • City Counc ii Minutes March 24, 1993 Page 3 Councilmember Williams staled she is concerned about getting the library set up as sot r. as possible, but is also concerned about precexcing the histo ri.cal sites. She felt the new siee is more pzact ica 1, but also felt the historical sites should not be forgotten. She felt the City was going to have to get a lo[ of volunteers and £or the residents to get behind the City in developing the library. MOTION: Moved by Stout, secontled Dy Alexander to direct staff to look at the Laurel/Aspen site as [he first choice, but to also have the option of looking at the other sites in case the Laurel/Aspen site details cannot be worked out. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ~~.... Councilmember Alexander left the meeting at 7:00 p.m. 82. DISCUSSION OF CITY COVNCIL COMMISSION TERMS AND SCNEDVhING OF COMMISSION Meer1NGS (Continued Erom March 17, 1993 meeting) • Councilmember Buquet felt the cost of the Commissions as reflected it the Gciffin Study was important and that possibly some of the Commissions could 6e consolidated [o help the cost situation. He felt all the Commissions should be locked at and suggested some be eliminated or their duties combined with another commission. He felt possibly some of r. he Co~mnission's tluties could be given to the Planning Comr.i ssien and to make it a seven member body. Councilmembee wi li i.ams statetl all of these suygestions are not an attempt to eliminate public input. Councilmember Buquet felt the Historic Preservation Commission should be combined with the Planniny Commission and reiterated Ghat the Planning Commission could be made a seven member body. tie felt there should be no mote than three Commissions. He felt the excess Comn~i ss ions could be used on various task forces to assist with mottoes as they came up, Councilmember Gut ierxez stated he and Councilmember Alexander felt the Commission structure was acceptable as is, but should meet less Frequent ly. He suggested the Public Safety Commission could to part of the Plann inq Commias ion. Councilmember Buquet explained that rt use to be. Councilmembet Gutlercez felt the ilisto tic Preservation Commission should stay as is, but move tlcwn to Eive members, and did not want to see them eliminated. He felt if the Public Safety Commission's responsibilities are given to the Planning Commission, that fundamental chances needed to be mach with the Plc rn iog Commission being more customer service oriented. • City Council Minutes March 29, 1993 Page 4 Mayor Stout stated he has a lot of ambivalence on the whole idea. He felt there were simiia rit ies between the Planning Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission. He felt if the Planning Commissions duties increase, they would need to increase to seven members. He felt the Environmental Management Commission could be used as a task force. He felt the Public Safety Commission could have their meetings limited in number. He felt the Park 5 Recreation Cortunission was a very useful Commission. Councilmember Buquet stated he would like [o see the frequency of the meetings cut down. Councilmember Gu[iezrez stated ne would like to keep all Commissions, but limit the number of meetings. Councilmember Buquet felt Che Planning and Historic Preservation Commissions should be combined. Councilmember Williams felt the knowledge that the Historic Preservation Commi ss i.oners has is valuable. Mayor Stout suggested that the Historic Preservation Commission meet • quazterly, but with the ability [o call special meetings on an as needed basis. The City Council concurzed [hat five members would be appropriate for the Historic Preservation Commissioe. The City Council concurred that the Planning Commission should stay at five and not fool around with rescheduling their meeting dates. Mayor Stout also mentioned that the Council had previously agreed that all Conunission Pos it cons would be interviewed. Councilmember Williams stated she would be comfortable with the Environmental Management Commission going to a Committee element on an as needed basis. Councilmember Buquet felt this should occuc with all of the Commissions except the Planning Commission. Councilmember Gutierrez suggested that quarterly meetings be scheduled for the Environmental Management Commission. Mayor Stout agreed. Councilmember Hugcet suggested all Coma~i ssions meet every six months, but Chat they could have special meetings if needed. Councilmemk~er Williams stated she could qo with every six months for the Cn;nmi ss ion meetings. • City Council Minutes Match 29, 1993 Page 5 The City Council concurred to vote at the next meeting between quarterly and six month meetings for all Commissions. Councilmembec Gutierrez stated the Public Safety Commission should be at five members. Mayor Stout felt that only one or two staff needed to be in attendance at Commissior. meetings. Councilmembez Buquet suggested there be an Environmental/Public Safety Cortunis lion. The Council concurred that the Fark and Recreation Cononission not change and meet every month because of their work load. The Council concucred that this come back ac the April 21 Council meeting Eor further discussion. Mayor Stout felt the Commission positions should be readve rt ised . . x • • . • C- COMNUNI ~TIONA FAOM TNR Dna}.I. Cl. Frank Williams, 9400 Hermosa, Apt. D, stated a lot of people in the City would like to serve on a Commission and suggested limiting the number of terms that a Commissioner mn serve. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated he would like to add on en item and atlded that the City has contacted the County's Facility Management Department and asked if they would allow the County courthouse parking lot Co be used as an overflow parking aeea for the opening games. Re stated two agreements needed to be approved by the Council - one was an Indemnification Agreement with the Valley Baseball Club which provides liability indemnification to the City for the use of the County Courthouse, and the other was a License Agreement with the County for the City to use the County Courthouse ^a rl'ing lots on April 9, 9, 30 and 11. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams [o add on the two agreements. Notion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Gutierrez to approve both agreements. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-`. (A Texan dec absent). + ~ . ~ • ~ • City Council Minutes March 24, 1993 Page 6 MOTION: Muved by Gutierrez, seconded by Ruquet to adjourn to executive session to discuss personnel matters and property acquisition. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). The meeting adjourned ac 7:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: • qYl Vm« 1 Sflp <00 ova ui ni >~ i O « ~ i ~W. ~: •Zi 116 •Di ~=i ~W o aee.eNrNhmNnmmommpa pmeemmanePpDpa «ImmnhwOnmON OOO.PONOOfOmrDepNp• NPNah nPnNOhIhNNNrOfOOmOPNnmOOhP FT{M Paf NmTf NNr OAmm raJ n ~ n n • • rNm.NahgPOJNII• ePOrNm.jaNm NII.nWhmP OrNm~IN N P d~000Od rh~rrAr~rrhfM1FM1 Fl~l~hrnwrh nFlmn rT-n h NNNNnnNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNnNNMNnNNNNNNNNNN nNNNn OnMhhhM hhhhhhhMhhhhMMhhhhhhMh~hMhMhMhMMMMhMhMh hhhhMh 1 1 I m . m q. q I. WN V V Sr • ! N \N q ~ N • h hUM +1 NT NT Gi h J P m \ h T> O WJrNWJ W p0 r.T V NNLL O Y h LV >V..L\ >Jq.h Z i• .. L CO mON JJ o ~M .tl eD J L Y W Ur rVhl V NYO Ip OmUSNN > U YiNJI>m N J2 'r JS Na[\ JhSJgm • m 7J .~ m Nqh p<Z W2W Mp W ~ ~ >im• Nm >yl\ S T J ~ w \ I VN YmJ > hN V;PM INDy J`~O FZJq V i6 i OZ7J OZhSN 70f Nln w J =~n j ~ N4NONi fOYJ im hf O.M fimh6gie\\ O m r m <I OW iiYJNJh. O mS0 w JghilO O WYNOWrNiWYhNw CY<NYV 2 O O NOM ONE 1... MNM YS hOWWLVLOMiOimZl \066 > h0 w mitl Zp'M J MiZ f20 OD N +00 Nh hOWhhYN wW V YMMNMLL M IrY ~ G 2 2 e D _ _ _ VUSTWf S>._ J0 2JMtZf J tN P m JJ °ui uW.N uOWONOi;Wm Nr~W.oWWW.\ >. <uii > • I ~„i oD c sf ;rzi.NUr N 1 N • L o i U . fVVWMWNemUYt N NVN W f66 M1 <SNW S4 iJ<W YhN<M N MJ.w M +.OJiw MNMY6ZJ6 ZL GJNY NWwMY r _ O UgJmOmVWZ MJYZNJ>MN6 <fJ2iZYiF1 NLV<> LL Y ) V Y~W Vy W~rO2J1j~YS~~WW~VYWWW tlpOYW;26Zrn ~j ]W OOfDWWf W O Y _KZW r Y NMrfO<JYh O>~4WOG i> pJN;hOMiOfhUOJUiNO ~0 NrM O i u V V f i 7 ! W N ~ Z N S Yi0 O i U « ZfVhmV 2 i S S MJ UVZ Y NNO N LL V O LwYrN i < O Stl OONW NV V < h OFgi N e V _ VL._ _ Z YS N + Z YhiNWV w UU ZO •tl OS JOM+M WWJ> ih i? mNV JO J Gj J W W Z 6NN w M3 O V WmWN ZiZOO 6W J Vh •V YJZJJ;J'JZ i «C aZ7N V NW NJ Y;2. DVmhn f ZO <r r N M LLPOi YWtQ6• m0 wN O aJJWOli4UVWm JO12Y~fYVO2hUhOitl OO VYpm S 6NhwY60MVhN SZFZ2w00<>NJi .itlN[VJtlYe.O hrW f .Om+ iDm WNOfhY •SNV NWWm R~ .JhM O O K iJOmSiD 7Zwi LZNDif •S ~N Wm Oi W{ i.J •ZWm.m Wf OZNUNYO ifJ ;UhW6 V > VVf i2 Y U • •Z U ZLLLN NV •i D~~OW 022<J<NONWY< > OONJi ~ J a NSOWNW9mN O• w > <„ 6ZJMyMW Ji'JVNJ3\ ' ZJbO<WDmmDJJ6h YiY Y1W VOWJYi N!L• :ihW Nf LLOYNWLfmU+h.VJ+JiNVJODYNhW:`giJSh;.i;0 VVNih 2 l f i N q.fm.<f<{ « < q0<ge0000m0 OVVVVUVUUVVUVU VYVOO a armgNOPNN• wimn Nf JNmNONOamNNmOgPwiTN+.P r . n0 mm P P m ae..« f~.m rnf• •.mmhhrmaw T NTM T TmNJJTT «h hTOrNThmNM TAm01M1r nF ~ 1 li P iNP VZ~ y6m __O <00 Y LL V E E 6 9 :E E mE=9 p~< \• m~¢• <~ O• J~ v~0 •Z~ •¢ z• WI Z• <: ¢t O~ O• e~eoe: °<m epm.om~oomoee.e~o~ off ~•~a r=~~ Brae ein<or~oiirvnrir~v .:<m~r .•.aoem p ~i°n ppANmNwN °e w.m~ ~Nnn Na J N N N Nm.'ahePe~nmaT~N wN~~Naa°a area nrn~.n.N-r n.mieomoomm wfwH1N•FM1M1M1NYIehYYnnYYNwNNYNnYNYnnFM1 NNNNmmNNNNNNNNmNNNmNNNNNNN ohhNM1FFFFnn'•YnnNl•I~hl•NNI•hl•wl•I•NFMM1FhI•n hnl•MNNI•F N1~~•MnM1nF e v 0. Iv O f i T pm T O e \T i N\o N\ NS N\N ~\ NI•vN \ 1• T\TNw n Na Nlm Si On faa•\ ~\¢N O\Nn 9 av\NPW PI•\ o• mh M1\m V \O P T OJ eL LZNf 0.\ T eNw O Ohn N~ N N\ vOV• O\v• V s\v S •Slw\V •1¢ ,SJm NINw~ NTVryN l L VOyJ0.0.T\ vN6jOOV Mv01„JNw J N F T 6 VT SmN •f Wvh ON¢ Sv 1•SN 1 WI eoJ116WZNJJIw CZ JYryJ1Y ¢ asWiJ v JsUJa• ~rc Or YON lJ~ Op Nv OIOMV O k •mN¢wONUu J pIFJW VO I~IM WJZ~VI uNJ •JV 6J\Jh6NJ2 ~ Rle WeZ VO O RI Z RZJ •vOf¢ FO < aONJZ O v S•,NeONNlWWONlWNw> YGy>iuWNl0wN i1LNIZhW\LL •INNmZTY NZ 6h Ow1VM OOW¢J wZ <OOhLLY00MOiNJLL m0 P2 t r•I NfN w<• 1•iV VO OvNOh JOW 02• i0_h_0.R OI•f Mwv ahwN NO )OFOYOhNmY nJe• 6 u YJJf 01.OSfJCJ6POiJJ)4 M1IZZ YLL WOWNaOR W_l6W• OOLON WtOW00 W J F••w EV WZSJ al-li = 1WON 00_ NOL O~=:YNi=i6wfOi NI W= mJYY wY N VVV Jpe)WZ ZWY OviW) S~•I<WOVwfU O< fiJV JJUfVOUVv NSNNUViNiI iV OfNNNUW70VNJNlNM0.NO 4ZN YN whV¢ LO¢NJY IJ vOhORFY••ni aO2YV Vi6NVY LLfm 0.WWIL<WWgRiw a0.ffVJ ZWS<v• 6RY OfJwwW6~~Sv J~y• O~~W)LLWJw) iv Ws~~ ~f NZW>Jw0 i ylN VOOfuu06tW0 .¢ <i)Oi6f6w~NOl..l ~i i)o sr o>:l VF 1 ~i O S Z 2 Z •~ N J y •, F < W W O~ J i0 S Z 2 i\ L O _ V O_ <Y OZL OM1I ZO v V JO L NWN w NU ON v 'J JV O R60 J h 6ZN1•VW •<u <ZRU O V i ZN iNV 1-V O NO 2M rVw M1CN ••JwM1f OW O Z fJ l9 YJ iZ •7vwLL 1-E~ ZJ WwOVN¢r•<N OZUR YYOJOW~N Nw Z~ fOliii~ NVY:yVLS 'itw N WfeVONfSOZV OI••ZV JJJM)JV wJJpOJ WV 1 ~RJ WNNO «f vpli• •LNIpOi p• W ~Vi<iNOJWwO uNN < /•~ • • Z pOwNYINV• < HJ• ZN W)ZO `OO •Nf FC'p~ilZ M1V=N l6 QO ww Ji?Z< Z fvYWNJ~•<¢ZJ i NI hOZOV< LM1 ~ li •w0<i• OO « N¢WWV¢¢OYMW fM12 ZVNWf IN •~ Z<N O<M 00 2M1VM1GOJJYOf •IOVMiiwW ¢YLOVOOJWSMJOVUZVZJJNNYiYUNGFV wJfNWWW~Ji~ NO¢v wOY ZiZ<O<JZOwW00'J fIN OOOWWLLLLY.LLLLWOVVVVVVV USSZSMMww 1'f¢ivvJJJJJZLLLiiiZSS2 TNVwNnon~Onna. na wTIV NryeNI•PO<NPNnNNwN+hY1000T0 NPTaPa I•Newf NM1r• w NaOwry~mNPNyA nP OrvNPN.e N •~ N nTmP•~P TnPTw n NTO N N A N T PNTT NAN 2 u V uzi ~.rv ¢1 =;0 J~ ¢~° •Z •d •>• • ; ~Z~ •y at u~ •t• •y' H; • ~ ~ ; Nomue °e eq e.d. +°~e i°e°en°oN°o°ao~ tlmPPNM1N Nr Nr~p•N'NmNn F NOq r°itl FNo .~ w wNw n NF n H.. Pm NN•m aaNO n.N.dm: mo mana n°N P,:'n PnaO3mIR0<8S9 T•Nwymm Nn+N rNn.NtlFm mNNn oFFNM1F F1.ynrhNnNyPnnnnnNl.wN1.yMNYNI.hNFM1I-FnnPNnnN1. y1-~nn JJ 0 a 1..1. . q 1 O OVm~ • • NnN m O O \ 6Vr W 1 Or. n OPS Z YIV 'J f Iln y y OWF NNn V U . •HL •N PNn\ M y00 air 00 O\ Z n0 Ni P• 6d'¢yN WUN IOZn V V 0 ny<\V •O nVN e\ • i NN oP wv NNrnr Ho wz i'o ua.P Nw Hli>N i • PNf .z OVtI Pt i\hWq O~¢ V.ZpM•V •V <J6V Viy{a HVa wa PO n\¢DJ OVJaH OJa npN J ynwdJ02 O_Wr\J NyW wyZ Na00 pyvn0 yd<~ • MWONaWZq taVaW 6n0\W • J .O Y¢[N uW JO JJ~y NJ 02 NJ aNl< nOJf HHafON Jy0°a m n¢J04 OmN62Na0 LLL NNI La .lia n Jo rW>N~ r VV01FN °2\WyyumiPW yr40~0<9d~aZV MfZ O)•LLOFtiON y..a fN CZyJJO Or~JZmw~df SJ YOHNJ~NdN~J J<gWZ60 'J<r i yZ Woyrw¢<ara r:ei:w :orW aP MrpN>p~yJrN JW~ N ¢ duo i0 J~,IFZ 2Zi6r`SNx fd w Z Vf WVNprpOOr. OW{Ww WOgOOVmmO aJ<i¢ZWZVOJJ rd¢ iWAi i_p 0_anW< NiNdNW..iLL JirO~ of SWa{a•N• NVV¢ dPyi a¢gOfp<Jn V ¢Jala NtJn OyNNOw OaWJ •La6a 00)6)Jd1~0¢>mS p00 yaiZ nN TZJMdyyq•¢ °fd>W>aO~ZH NiOiLOwi1J\FIi NJJW~~Y JPfOU)O)<Jw j~J.IW mJ OJO°JO°pJNUwJmV000« J<N6pNZNn •O V>oriaaWOaOauOai[•o V H H2 J V r' Z N V. w6 Ot < ~ _ _ f N U_ _ _ _ V ¢ y 6 JO f J H o 2 >> q f O rLL iJ 00 FL f r r z ¢dZN O L yV[ y~JW VOp• _ CN >VwOSN NSYJa ZwZiM OM )O~• WZJ V>OHHnP• LZ 2¢y fdr.J JO¢VI 2 VOr W V W f r y W .. w. O W V f f O H 7> N W JJw .Z>MpNZLRVOq r[iiV.y ZV VULH MS HN L¢WyN .W<V wdfZa r.O[LN ry<W J w a^NLiW tNiOWOWOy00pnJJWLy WS~ y •OVOiWFNw JOLO L WVUVJOi3UOtZ2L>'JIaZZi[Z[WYf JN> ~<f We.06 ~ •f <f WH01«ffVVWNH[ 2000CaLOaaLp6LfZ6¢NNNNNNNNNNN 2 O O dH O OW y dU 2 O 9H ~V r0 VdNJ J VW SwWN O V ZN U O 6WVi6N ZN 20 OVa•O JE a NV yVOO., fV i1`z¢siu`es wgpiw'q '~.W. _ WV V°WM SOZ NaOa u rr H JJ W>f•>rOWy .'V • LSSOjZN W saL>WM VV ryyZ WS •V~aaa fy JOJrJa•OZUO<•Z6•NN NN NwNNNNNyryYyr » » > NnONynyigPN Pml.Oh OOTOPr•.~}P•CNNyn MgnOPN n•gnOPIPOfrNPrvmO nqo msMn mn ir-HgNgarnnnNPNP•<H n q mn w r1nN HO On ~ngNNOH Hpn NnNONO Hn n ~ i w ~~nw JAN VKI O<O Z1 2LLo >uYiw V W E 9 :; ;: °9 =E ~. _: IZ iw •21 •<1 •ZI FYI •VI ~ZI •WI • ~ I Nm Ne~°ao masaaaaao OFM FI~I~NhwhwMF i U ~ t u< W z r s m u r o .W.a dne<.. i 22 nw WV F Yt V FS 7JJ o~< i 4J F46 f ~ 6< OwJV2w OoJJG SWw wJ •V OJtNN« S •W NR<GSON iwa i• °eww< swn°.w.w n'"~ M1JIO Yf06i;t6 Osuie V Vrc 2 e O VZpY pFW YpiWw<C VZ O<4YZ0 Zp VJyJJi~2M2<Y •i: weu iuWJ:i •~c ex< Z4<°ZZV UWZ ~Z4RIZY< WVrtY~wf~WOZi OZZM wJUCp « W L O 1 W 3 OpP« OTO •° p °w~ n n 4, \ f v -NP Viti 9tN ypsm Dfo Z> VLLO W•FIW Dws W V 1 pOmNNmpp •bNrveaoNianoF wa.T. n ooamoao m'aw wene~.l eo V•NNaNOFNN•OM1mFOn•OPONNNNNNO OTF N w~h~Nti Oy00 o•hw T.-e ^fh N•o m _ .+ NeTwa N TN P T a mNw T~ N n w Nw NNN ~ a " E 1. E 9 =E a i N f Y N A N I• .\ JFTINn~VNOFOP Oaa wN aT O•N..OpphOPOwNTfPaF1O1~~POwNN•NaF•PCpwNm•NahOP Fl~~1••mOio~lO~lOOOIOOOOm~Oili00il~eam~ei00e0.OOi000imo NNNNNN^NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNnNNNnNN OFFFFhhFFFFF hFhFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFhFhnFFnFFFFFFF FFhF V!I I• • • L L • ILf I•LLL IL W U • f ~ N a0~ w o W O oTTO 6 O!2 Ip i tilh > °o iNi :Y O.yi i °w n~o W wr:i ~ PF OJ F O\VL N \NN• 1 hwTf ( N w __ O NYO HOiO IF• O•POP• pT~ jN N p VM1 P OMNZV Tw ~MNO\P WLOVW V UV LryN NV OL W NQJ F __h00\ FVh V f O VWV F• Ft•1)p •WJ L •II! NF•VW V hV FO fhMOY M W< =` \N J ZNOJNIfNNwJhS JWZJ•\ LST YN ~ IWt 30fVOP J V2 sfVIWVIN OfJF W W N aL JZ < WWwLJf wYW6JJF iJf ~J\1WOLVZ >N ~ ZW if NWN J IS l ZOJON „WJpIJ•mZl UY Of : ~ V N =i00 ~phJZN'J>V 'JLiO OIWZW FOY O J fTMLhVW WLL NLLL NLZ Slpfl ~• Z f•1 U V YY60 ls\h s I N f h aNloa~ rJ2 .hIWUW~ :if si .• DWIVi»fU fiOV 00/~NNZfW 1 F e N N= fMJDh SN••Y.> NVNLL.'~WThhw WZJ UNFINO WFOZN LZNIf N N OW OMMZZN ~JfW p ZOJW I O p WNSWFVY OOOhN •Wp66FW •iY0 SWV Zf NNgb WLJJ L Vf OfZ7N• YW`SJ WZWNFy tL W=` W< L i00LLZN V Zt••f>W > Mf _W IL>O 2N 0_hWLwO WZZhOf Z ~O O 1 < hF< J`OWZ• M VIWR~Wa2n WN f ~ Y NNO WJ>WIJZ tFhlfcl~M N< fYNJJO WNZ j Jf WL WWZhP N Z~Wtt<DSYMNi ZF ftOVFWNJOVZ V O J SU6UF WOOSVN •1 O hVhW=VVFONY ZfFWZFSOfWZMJ JOF VWONWML >JL~MN L fWWJZN~~NiflW\\<OZWf2iWW2WWW ~<N ryQi}:LLf YZLN60 • O i>iLN••V LOVVNOITIONf NF1i Zf Zf)O NSN Ol FWTLLYN O M ~J N •Zi } i J O O O O N : • <SV V = > ? W • IN V ~ N t fZ W OZSZ ` F = FJ ~ VVYn F • V J y u f yiN ~ Z V NZ W >ZMi Ow ~• V2ZN O Y O VVZ IZn D OY O ~ S ZW 'JNW>12M YQ UZ iNOZ V i ZNO p Lp U VWN sOW JpJ f ZW LZNNN < ufiM O>Y ~ _y ZUZ MN <WN •1• Ny Y ZZ6 W l OWh Z W FNtM M >ZV • •) W WF7<W V Z< U Y ON „ O ZZ p JV MiOVW ZWW •J ~V YO O ZWNNO i NN O WWWN» <W N v< ~Ni LhnJ V hs V F hW N h' INti~fV >W Z~J OLy 60 pW WOVN ~.M SfJWF {hJ JOWWNV •__ N9 W:h VZJiRi JJN VC W O M <l<N0001•N •W„OZf V V OJO < YWNgNV www ~NR J Jb_{ NtOWO NOl NM W N„ <1J NJJ <ZWFW pRW Y i Y hN OJM1iW J\<Wl VVV• Zi i f V VOS f•h N1iV~ •ZO< „NWItW 1(N •i Jq < )ZO WW ZUZN ZZ s J J W WZhZ W1•'• •yZFNOZ •J)W hF<_ O JO« •• W t • w < OiOi<YNYWZW2Jf NNi0100'Jf ZOF ai i<>WUZY LLRhZVZ V > VFL~OVNSN>Z<JfZf ~jl<•YYftj~JSfM~ ZZZ UJNZWNW COWLMO N L f<f <Iff<OODOZOIOR<OOOyVVUVUV VUV VOOOOWV WWWWWLL M1 ••w•NY<TFNFNOFlTa•fryNNNFPIO OTO NP•NOTL 'ON<PT wPM•MNON'TNN•fllaPaOFNTOPN O••N T•T gNON•NN NwryH m • NN Nw ~N•wy••NP V • wiP NryTO TO•w T •1 NN h N T TFTNF•1 MNI• TF NN TN • ~ Y • I • ~ i i Y Y YW~ 1i• Y f YZ• fs .p: •p• •ZY •W• • > • Y 5~ N v f Ni O 1 _ ~ O iW0 f00 OFN ON6 !JO ,w LL ui ell Wt F: 71 PLO •i oooeo+meoaoomNweaneNNeNwew + eooFPeNwIN+eeHmnnneep+ i+ ~~~~seAaaemAweoNeNriwn.i N NNNNFNVNOFNjT'NaryTywO N N aw ~ N A w T P ma.+oeaTeoeo hl:e~wNPFOO a.romoo i rFO+amaNaaaeee:.e FNO„tiNPPFhFOma~O+ a NF N N NT+NOhOPOTNT+NOFpPOtiNA+NOFmP01NT+NaFmPO.rN T+NahOPO C ORpO NNrV NNrVN AATAAATTTII+ paa PP wPP PpRPPPPPPPPOPPPPPTPPP/~pAPppPpPPpPPPPa a P NNNNNN ANNANNNNNANNNNNANNNNMNNNNANNNNNNNNNNNN OhFFFhFFAFFFFFFhFFFFFhFhFFFFFFFFFFhFFFFFFhFNFhFhFhFF • _ _ _ _ Wp Z N mN p 00 N 1 NTN m Z m i N t F N mN+ U !\ N W • iA MM +V N T 000 OA e+ O Z Nn ry Ot M P FPO ~ wiuiF i m inu ~nb f•1Jao P I: 1 1 1 < .°~ N.w. A saw HW e I Iz IT iW<I I e i PPONOO JW WOO pOM FJFO NTO ` M m J OW AF O Z~{ T FOWO Na+ W Z _ •a N_ • Pi O N < !e O'J ON ~ V ORO N O F W N7 mZ0 N•\L O dNY PO O V F a S N 1 N'J•m >aW P_ W O TN •1 Oi P V 2 F 90Y VA Om m0• Z V 'J F~fl Q\F T t •PiN \ O O V LV ZJ~mJZ hFAw J OJOP JJm JFJYJ JJJP 1 Oy J 6YFSV6 NVN VS\ NVV N•yiV YVONNNW 6/NW• ZiW FYMmN{ irl WmOOFLLNiiip yW OiWPNWMW {~ Z=+ • WZ JWJ•W\\ JWWiNOYWWW\ iWWWAJVJF i 61FW<_1 VFmF•__O_{N • i603 6 N 1 •00>f iWJIMI OONYmNO \NWi9N9<M10 eNNNWiNN~JN\ WMMMNOVJWFWU<Wl uSi\Oli hJ•{NiNYi S MIf F\f IYIA FIiION N MFA9yIZ 00 NLL 7 SNYO U • \JI i T~ O m1i>iS M VLLJF2 JIL W\ YWJWmJW! NNWJJ\FO JNJV JJJOWtWOYM6ifJf `aJiNJW Wli VJU<Ji<>hWyJJWi•MJWJi ~<JJJTY<YILW<W<O?Z ~W 76 O>iOiO'JfWONhiJO W 06'JN i9'.f 'J wSii iN u ZP• aN: 1'O iLL2r•f mVli•LJf OOLLWLLi WLWWASJiWlWZZOLLW wiNOSwa ijR~+ViWWZNU •WZSUf +Oit~iW YJiziOWJWNWJWNOZF N NrOmWmFFMF•MONY{ FNN 6 FY<N <yNMMAFNNJOyO\ONe fON Oli hli i1L ZJMOWi mIF W ~[ OM ZZi6•MLLWJ > C•FW/=WNNWN FY J <NFFOW JFW iihFbAelp M• SNVJhi ro~sNSOm:1S li. uyi~~~~i3Ngiiisa'o ».+.~i~i ~ss~i~ias«eio i~ufe~~ 0 Y N W • S < h N 70W ~ i N ~' <66 V ~ • u z es s \ V ~- i JP W N I i.+14 u Y IL ~ u{i J 2 W V ON • YW>LL Z O N i U S• W J F YO O iNJ•N ON V fJZ NNJLW N i WW U 7N JM N W J •<ih OZ OV V\W •> O~ •JZO< Z Zh N_O _•_ OJ ON ZOJVO i YV i MVNVNNO W > Jm< O_L { <SJ O •• N{ V YFOW WZ iOh NV n>JJ {Zi>OmW{ WNYNW•pi Jm i OiW W i JWO WWONVNiNJy VJif in01f1 OWih<JJ{< iNYNNM• •J<O hNN>N•i•NmN FV>OJNii i•ymJJOOV W9WWiON 2NWS< • » 'JWJ+O {>SN•Wt<O ><OW•<ZYi Z<WimJt<J• N/UY O J•O Z< W{01+•JD• •V{ON>iWN UZ{OOW<7<F <O Vii<VFJN •{ VW •~i JUG Ni6N•JW JO NN•S V1 i0 Ni •Z• N• 7<~iN< m<i• •i< IWtFOOWJ > V Ni •00 OYJ Z i<tNr<iiYW ~rhiNJYWWWVhWpyWF{W •O« >iNJiONV{WYOJ MV>mgMf ~tiN~<NNOYf m6i0)WOWiI>VNYOOWOJJ\IONNiiiNZiVM {i00 Om09ieGFJZyi O<000><{WNOO> ViSiZ<i0•<W000Ya1 \ « <VOVOOOOf<WWNO W MILVVUVVZZZZZZS M'ww NN1W1{tlJJJJJJJit Siiiii ifCiiiiSiiii <aT+NFPOPIINONNaNPPPONOwme000aN eN+Ff•TONPNONFONO .4ahNPIhtiN~OPN1•a~+NNNOfF+NP+NVIPO NFAh1110mN•N+++AO TPTA TP PAN MN w NNTN<ryA M T N ~11M TN N NANTPNT Q A ~~ ~1` UZ~ u<m ! 1 i) U e ZLL O„ LLNw Oj6 LL i i ii wi foi W1 t1 _f ~ !• O• O• 2• >• WMNnmenNeaNNmeNn^T ea acnaeo.aNrNar-! N ooae P.Nioep amTr•epFNOwOTOnTnONN ii-lanna NanaT omeNamnnamN rN .. o ram .. Nr rN.N N a •ePPM Way-Jaoca e1n .~.oo~n a.. .aim oln Na0 NaarNaNP P mONNN w PO aTa M NJ i n n ahepn...pprnmpap N.a.pp l~p-pi~P~pp e..nmaNawnmaNenip e..nmaNawoPa nTPPPI~P PP~PPPPPTPPPPPPaaPPprppPPPPPPPO Y1FF V1 PFM1FPNNPNPMNNNNNNNMPNNNNNNO eMMMFFYFFhhhNMNn MMM hhMMMMhMMMMhhMMhMMhhMMh O r J i 1 O J < i ST NJ F J IO N h iN W Pm \ PI Yr Illa~~ N 1 VNW Y T W 1 O~ M ^111 Ur i; O N~IIw W ZVr O O! h ! \h OP:a :w ONNi V • V : O! = N y yl TT P h ONN) iP ~!Y V O• ii N PIVO aWn1 YWO N J •>O iUV \O mONI Oi 1 N== ihJ Y •NV Ni Pf0 iN1La w FU fi• J 1!!00 ~ 1 O i01Lr J OO~ ON{ V lOWNMN SZ ONI TOO 1 i UP=i1' G Nib M ) hY iM O J 2 O !10 •IiJV FWYTJN O MNN~ >VM¢ W JIOhOOZ>WJM ZN0yV2 YO P20lPV~tO! <Wii WOZYOWZ>W•WN V< 'J 'O mVNN O NN O jiMN MSSOWh>hIWVMhW U iii i21 f OZ6LL~06N10 D SOOiViWWOi „Y`W i91NOFWN \ fW W JS ZfVY NZZG WOi >• YfOFF_h_Or h_uN a1w OOiiJ •hV>aNWN Ff0 ZOU ~OWi60l06V1!!fLL• Fi WWVW e~!`O!M•<PfCZ J2Wh JM^aZJJWN N<F • Nisi_JON •fu N ZOirMYWWNWWV ~TrwNfLhWOWUiONLLJfO WYINjhV N>JZN~WO•ILLl2uf0~4J OM1 iFiMlY6N7! WOSi< 1 fhOYJtiOtN<ZSJSfV6 W.paNilWn>Z ZNNy V~iOaV,Vi MN_ MVVir O O e YOTa« tKl7 'J>JOWJ Y i NW6>JVOUif O J iWMJfS2h! iF iJl^>IONhN O W !US VuiWif <OiNNhfMhVNWFY iWhWWiMOJ I[ TF}PNiiY pU WJMiO LV\VJJ<WIN==MFJrYwZJNVZMfi~ OSJNii<riNh{•JtiYN 6<ffGViif NWJFNOJiNti i OUSVTiN6Nfi VZi WV JW y V OJ 2 <V M N i » O NU N O _: J V=y V i ~ Yt i i t O 00 O h u oiLL! Nip o s i YyW Fi W N m:lo J iNN is W J ~ ~ uiliy WJZ< y{W e N666iY <hu UVO[ ~! i U O« NILiWNJ VZ W< < 1'IJJJOJVNiih• fOh JY< i OJJJJJWWtY IiVOW {i~Jinp6 tZ YJJJJ •N0 !JJ VVVWW J'JW> N Oi'JJf ~JJ<> Y»>WO iONW NyVViNilJ~GNhVNNU~~FO1Wh wWW<J NJJJOP W<Y i W O iNNhWyOJ 4WWWVWOiOi'YW ~JOSNflOM NWh ZYh>f YYO\V~ZOO<NyJVW__J ~_> i yyWlh•yNiNNO\NOi9f> !!1[< J«f«SNiO!!!J «<WN<UWWNNi 06!lLLIG\\!\ZCOliYYYNNNMMMN Z Z V Z 1 O M WW !' i rh r uy i ZN f WVF O ON y LL NVw NO O O Jig I N__ _i a_• {N) i { N V UO i2N iWM< O\6 OWU NJJi Ot6NJ UOV C>J> •{V WWWWhM •!O •pW !J hh6~yZl IafFMhFNYLLO 00<OlJiUJNNMNNhhJ< NNNNhMh00 » ZZZSZZ4 haaa00PNrPaaNaTPrO0aN0NhNOh aa1JOFPMTTMNONhP NNN_n PNN •POaMNNNNhTNmwPPN mPPaaNrTlfOrMa MOTMhNP NaPfiMN~10 PN'pMT NaONNaTPOnn .In n1 •N NTN N m T m i11 M m NJNN r1 N 7 ;-~ ~Nm 1 Va0 rcl ==0 ZLLO V i i .. .. W, V~ ~S P~f i i •; •Y i ~¢ :O J t2 :W O O 1 bm m nl m N N Nm Om OJbOOrvbhpNNPNOJNOPO :OOFnOOnN~UJo bJAa mmJOJrv~~NtlJJtl NOJ ~rJ~O'N ebb w O ~ 'I n my Mnm N m J NMN +N n .r J n A r~ ~i~p~ieii TNmVNbFmPOwINmJ mJN'O N9a NNO NNNNmmmmmmm mmmmJaOfOfo 000000000 OeoOOp aiJJJb`UObOtlbbbtltlbbbbbtlbbbm bbbbbbbtlOObbtlbmmb tlbb OFFFFFrvFrvrvFrvrvFFFFFFrvFFrvrvFrvFFFF'-FFFFFFFFFNhFFnFFFFFNF V 1 1 1 I a I f f f f ¢ f f + V O w d a OH um ~ a Fa .a. ~:u F F°1 arJ ~ f > N ma Msm ii v zz°Na ~u N m P ~ v KM v d~~ Wrir o'o~ w + ° ~n°~ .mia z + NmNxw °xu u Np wi PmNw° OZPwV _ FN¢ NLLN 2 mw ] m o _ _ mV yN0 • ON N» • f .~ Vn\Ob vNi ¢ wZ! N U> N6 V ti ~+ 2NV° O >W f NJZZN ¢Nl2W+ YmwW V! 2 J ? Zrv JJ r+OV JNVfO JJ Wr~u~-IO rmJ FJJJJJN 1- YV ° \\Vf\iRW \m •IJS<Y\[¢] SJNwr~\ °\m\mK ;W fa mmS°N YV\Ii r°'ti OmNrym m N 62WN fN SN i Zm NJYZi1tOP ¢°' Vr J .~ \f YO LLLLK< JLLOLLN YWLLF 3°'22 nZ YY 00 YOFn°OrvLLJiSFOryryVYFNr~N l01[ OdOZ2 I I W uD2 ry2 VZ NZ J.+ V% ¢JF<LV¢J NFfOhYrYM u9 f1fLL6 N2JV r°<i6°>JYU<J<SSNZ222SJ V V O ryJ iOYWW mLLJ WO WN zwWJJdii6f JW WWwwO ¢261[ ziNZJ ¢iOY.W iVNf G1 mVZO¢LiY;KO my wN~ Niw u u V WL JNV<fryK2JOFY <OW2VJWhLLO<WWfffV 21 SF i°JWrvrN iJ6NmYSKU°2uONyFNd2i N1-6 6°J O I-10 ¢im»>66af/VW ¢]FIVYM2 N]6LL1¢ ¢¢N 2¢F °; ¢LLiWfLiYFZwLLi fZry• LLW WWW¢ O O ¢wKw SZ Wf1YYOW~WwO>JWp<SW>WLLmJWf¢~w>mST iJ Y > a °YmK wN >Y6pONZ~n¢up°¢<°'MY06uP6>iN<°'On000^O<° V V 2 O N ry N 3 Z 23 W w U ¢ °V 2 6 FSU Y u f 0 2 N V VVO NVV t NVJ OUI- °JN W2J Z VOY O ~'> •O V JYL2 W N2 NJry° Vf • Y. 2 WFW OF Uw W;6 QJ ZZ r NVYN3Np ry YZ uV UWGi VJW N V WN2 O¢ WOy WZ J J Z¢ F]WJ J 0V °0 S¢ ~VN¢ OZ4>1-2M F QS wl.. O(;"IU ON LL'V U¢MOWNT Z VF~ryV V 20o NUNO fVMVV2 LLV]¢Y Y6RV fViNs JZ~-I¢JJJV OF<• i¢ Wi i m W LL2N 6hJf°LLOU NWNFKSO rl[29 ff<f<1[ V ViYV f_Fp62lOi2 ryNM L uVF SV JOrv9Fi2°' S Oe FY[W pN JVff;OJZZZS2Z• "J h Nlwf4 •Vf • r< VNO LL Jf¢°'6Y¢ 2 Jf¢N VVZM NZV NJ• JOOO00Z 20 O t2LLW fQ YWONJrvIMVZWm'JN '°MtWLLYtOWS3NW°LLiLLLL4ry Z Z 020 u°V¢m6¢ FF 6~VfUw6NY<uYJ¢ONfOS¢V •JJJJJ2 ] YOO nJJiF;2i0¢¢¢6NOY Qw JpoJ fff <ft f V 2 N2p2 mt fafff<fffaOfff<4ffJmmmmmmm9mmVVUVUUVV N 9 nmP mb ~JNbmNOmNbJm OFb ryNbFmnNJryPFmONNMPb h .4h• bPOPFPbNV mNmNmVJOm mNFNFP m N aM1N+P M mNb Nm Niv1 mfaJ Jfff'IV N F P .nFP m F NNNPFMnF NNFr1m NN YmFF FFNNF N 8 ' s E N; E tigmNm rNOa..ma Nona rra i c oN n iii . mNrr ..a+P ,o . + iomo ~rve m r •N PaNnNN NNmO ~ N .. T., h .. .. NN m aw .. .. .. q.. nd w N N T + i ~ ~: i ¢~ O• ;• N anm maN aNanm JnmTOyNT.I N.pnmPOnNT./ m0.•N anONO.~NT mOr.NTaNah Naaa mmmmgTmq o0oo 0 C m n m Oaaaoono' ooaaaooooo mo m eaaoo o a a . aaaaaa N a Ohnnnnnnnnnhhhhnnnnnnnnnnhrnhnnnnnnnnnnnnhrnnnnnhnnn !rt < !R• !p! f < 0 Y • f • • 1 • T I V \ \N O • \ Mm m a p0 W0 \N a N ~\\ 1 • C• N Y O '~ a• \ r Ou O 6•• 2 Y z i V ¢a ~u o awon a i .. 0. u / a ONUZ r• D 61 •V' LN ~ F 1 U2rv • O J L •. ~. O O 1¢ I h F J Jn • JJNN7 a0. F JN 7 Z J2w n\ I n 41 u • W16ff i'V 6 0 0. ii • Y 6w NN 6J 1 1\wZ w JJ=V.+ NLL7Y o[OMV WJ UNWYUNF a2~ NV i2 2\ YWN WIJ V Z• KIYmNrt •V <m W< ¢LLZZr0. ¢2V <OOio <3 Z WJhLLO w¢OLLVnU60 u Y OWrv•VOJ fSU JV ¢rW VNY .p • i 2000 \DOW ¢OOF'J JLS<<Ffh 2JN• nVN •.LLmN¢ O V 0 NSNwNO2 Z N{m 2 J 6 f h•+Z NO¢ u~VN Nm•~h•.LL NWW N w < U h J /V• J2mm6 f26U {N JZOZYCO<NtJ 6JJ< V'SVLL WZJJ~•O 4<{ J\NOi¢{w40 iw>WMOOq V<Jfq K ~+1 iZ 06Wm hVw. 02i fhZ O LL aVw JVm hJYLLO•~i JJOMUw NS O•Uiph~ J<V< ~6~WOT N LL U ~ WVOOSU 220V {Om¢2•.¢wV G4ZWViUGFNV7 ¢YVLLOJ OOF60 n rcrcW i ix .m~oJ mh<hOi .JMf mwwu.. No..Y..nwYLLLLONODC .z NDLL ~h~ N VZ2 LLVf< NLLZw2SFJwJFOZWLL¢V{mLNZ N •.WD •W W{ {ONm. ~~JWYSJ LL>u<rcVOOYm¢04ZV{vN06NVVYOtiOiWO>mO30uYTiUNNf <IfNVZwm • / V V • •~ • ~ N • 2 2 V N •. r O u 7 O Sr D io z: ~ V1Ja rid °.w mna° z h m yJ SuV•1 O< J • •'•JNn ~- tLw rtL Jnl WS N O • N J a0 Grtiu O NQJ ~ JYN Of3OW •.N ¢N •~Ffr> W Lh ¢ = J•'I V4m wt W __ ZJUFWL SUi JD ¢Y Vu ¢IV W ZVV U ¢ 2H:u ¢Vn<2i6f YUmw nlp J•. /.wifZF h0 h ~ Oh rrw 'lu f VYn ~NLL Y N U 1 • ii • VLOU VV6 •S YiM VN1[m O J6 •UwJNw W2W UZ2VU SNJmY •L N2021-NS<YU¢~ SJ • • O NN N4Chh;¢p(< Oy J1VW$N <{W`• fiN OYa •V ~ w LL • • _ _ ¢DJ D7 LLwss nW> ¢pwOwP wVNZ40 YJ h < hV f •i• 4 rt nL4>rOp N<2 ~NINf¢ OVM1 1-~S¢ V20LLLN1 NZ•Z.~hhVii2¢O4DVSVVwSrwJS4hwfNVWLN1wJ¢rc ¢<OVY •w 9\ « { LLNYOOOODOO; » Ot{wwW •. NfVCN3 MV< MJ¢¢0 •i• UVUUUVUUUUVVUVVUVVUU000000000000WWWW.uLLLLLLLLLLVUVUVmVVV •K• hmFOpaT NNNOUiN mp~a NNr NTpaAPn N~gaagmNOOah :O: a0rn rNPPaOnN ha0„a~N:NTNrO NaN^~ a N ~ m rt a •Y• TTNTh nn nN !1 q h T •. ••n ~• h TN T. T T Tr.T TT .,; ;w' 9 s :~ : , .. :• m; E . ..: ; ;: a: \ rm oopNp h•aN Pam mNN F000 eyb ThNYyhn1NPPPNymTPNT mOO N.1 i- m•m \1 myT.~N hN~p .p mfr M~pN~ n m n w ~i~ N 2t n~Ohm NTrN POS. mhmcpw NNPm T \2\ 000.E TTm TI.1T TnIMTyyy lJyy •¢\ >O ~OVmw4WL~Om~000m<NNO wOW mW N~000 O~OONW~O ~ObYNw phFhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhM1hnM1hhnhNhhhhhhFnhhh/~FhhN~-h hhl~hnn \ZI \ • \ a• !! •• !! a f • !! • \ S T L 2 N U = LL 1 p ~ p PP.. } i ~ n T m \ \ -r , iV0 NN¢T • yJU m< r T 11\ V WSti \ hN \ \1N N Pi V hN2 mi YA2 a 2 1\CN N\.~ \ !\W N101 • y O U LNP _ • \w WWR > ¢xVYI •\Z t• C0.FN• .~ 2! tlhl j ~ V2 V UaN U\LL N Mh.~ Y Phu nl-p2r 0.LL„ ! NVh ~ a LL Of¢ !~\T W 1J IIOJJ OYV ~ uLTPI\ OUJLLi 1 FN NN { ¢O L} \ 6YLL JJ•' T WJ 0.a•hIV ¢W\ON W=y •u w •0.V Yf6uNNP\VN YhY~tiV I Jh2 J OIgJ NJ JNJ ti.~O O\M2LL NZJ ' 9 V zWO i ~ H ¢U<Y TKLL tltF a11¢J6VyU Otl VY'VGCh z N6 m wzw h~zw ~ pPw1 Ja .. m oft zr. .+uua fJ0 \ \ONLLNw= = IN LLU ¢=>NLLLLWW 11 Z' ~ Ow hhN h ON 1-. OO N ¢ O 0 n 1-w ~INZ WY> L 00 y2u JJ\ JW hmY.. rVP w UN ` W OJP YVjJ2 JYgUJh ¢W JJ2 wVJY12 2>Jw JJ ZSlQ6 tta>tVU> Or272wWw UN20 IZHY>0. ¢SVq W 2JJ wH Z V220 O _ _ ~ WpY= OM LLI 1U 02~ L> O LL LL mmg Z= Sn tliwi \a2V. OCrvuiF PFN<OJ fVVW VVJtlOULL hh2WfW6 ~¢20VW u ¢tNKUFN NVLLN fZN 0.NNIF WL OOV2MhI-fir \L• RJO WYtiZ¢h¢ N2YYV2 NSUMJZS siwir a~' i ¢ t wi uW N 1 wNwy w x~ „ ~LLOi >J w~LL Ja .°.o ~YiN¢>z Jti 'm..Y ~ WY.. Z } C M PU06U>Z.~¢ SV¢OU>p• 4ZiNlOMOV6tiim O O y PO¢72i¢ ; FI Y Z ¢ F J Y2 V ~ ~> Y W w 2 ~ U Z w N N N .V Vti ~ J wOZ U N~ J i t ¢2S NWV f ON .YN i N } V • > 1- WO ZJN 4 V J2tl hh 6 NO uJi Y 2YJ i0222W NN2 w tlVU Uir il V m VJ t~Y »i^~V 2YNL ~2yHW U2¢ W6N N \ •20L2 G J66fSH> tUW W UJ'.]wSOOWO ¢.'JwNtl> M \ _ WDyN< q WYfw• •L W N0 p •Zi ~NhwV hJ 0. h 0.0 tt N OL40 ~02V FNt¢ ¢%20 2N fYMYZn KUZZWM6 Jtl \ O S• 1 hZOOVLOhNf ZV V tl~N .OWVV2JO •<12 J ~ 1 u2~f~VW •Z UO~;Ntl„` u •Z6 NN W~N~ZIZNNF ZNJ2Y O w 2Z 2 \L~ L h ¢ •N RN6xim OM OaOwYU JZ Y¢1[ w gM atlas JJNYOOOUO?JJ}WLZ Jq0 J¢Z9>V2Z'S SMULNw 6ggYJ6h 1 \ w wY0p0 J /Y 2 2L •tlOOgJSZOOtlfwY000» O .Y Y f f tl U W O ff V \Y\ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ SZMN.~MYIIIIYYYYYYJJJJJJJJJL L ~ • •R• tlPh .n•~1pN TlNNrWNN~YPPnmrrT NJINTON M1NNONmNNmP rYNrN~NmnPFwNNrNP^Ny Ihh Nr..Ir \O• \X\ N ym0 TN TNP M. rl ti1 N nPT TN Nr~'4yNP N n TN wPNP NPNm NN \W• 1 1Q V• Y.• OdP cOroNNOOOU.NN O..OOdo00d0¢NOrN.+POPUVMONONNO<•.NONOOan : ; O•OOpNNOnON mONOOTd _ Y• mJdd00rvmmdNOVa NdJm POrnN..N \• N mn •m TNPdd..PnNdga VY .Y N.~ W Jr Na N •. VN ..J nm .~ m N r eN si d oY N i v i . z pY ¢Y •O• JPO.+NTJN9r9POYNTVN rvrlV wdhmPO..Nm•u.d l•0 mJNdr i ¢•NNN NNNddd NdOddd rhnnm00a mPPPPPPP a moumimme noa~ aa <i o i o ooau aoouoad ouma ¢ o . a a c n~n d n d /¢ nrrrnrrrnrrrrnrnr •rhrhnnnn l -rnnnnrrrhrnnnr prnrrnnr ii V f i < !• « a • d NJ \ • • •• JJY m L • \\ 6 V •mN •O si ~~ uw<¢ u N~ ~~ ~ 2• Ji iw ¢VW LL LLJ 1 M mi L V i v N\S O ae\d >O w1Z6JY JN OJo u Z ml JN O\r dl•V i f d m1.1 ¢K¢LL nWNI WJ2V•. Nwn JJWWp N Tllm NZO ZNP NJ i Nt\ 2 2M 6 <h^ • P I¢ NWO< •. W YJ r V P U aJ W ¢ w ws m • iW•.0 I l•NNy Y OMO \ <i P V ~¢ O YN r OY Su f m J J ZZ IY 00 J • O _ NUN J \W¢zJr NO¢YJ On¢JLLJ \ VPha 6RLL VY 60.0 1 \ 2J Y n S , T _p JpJ i N6 1•.f .n2N N•. W •JYO=jww FJUI..W ^O .-ypJ ~ ..w\u mJm •OJwUwmww 2 •. •.YOO Zo Z U U¢F ..22 J<•.NO Z2 LLyOWm! YV N •~ r~ ah~KZN ¢VO\• WJMZ NZO KJ.+ w4VOZJFNLLC< fUNJLY NJJ ¢•. LLVO¢ nNLL1rY fY2Y oY-J ZJ~ LLf¢ <ZOJNwYO OJw a 1N N4< ZK WVO 6dJ2LLFIJ w t p O LL .• wJw FZ •J w20 •f< aW¢W2hh WOIJw U .ZiZJ VJr ZL¢N¢JJGZZwwUa[O FYV~LUid¢rN¢pK22FrZ2 1-2• r J ZI• LL<Ww.. UO o ihzNweno~i mxosr-<aN ow pwwz¢I~ mmiLLii J LL O miwVNW¢ I ~UV .wSII<'JZ 7J \<¢ 02 ¢ U ~ NKr ¢Z <2•. zUOa SY SUJ OUNh6Jm0 rn06w.. 11 N YI• .2 JJ JU fS..Y N¢6..i .nZa rs[ .2 F mwVNY~;ULLHWWOLL~Q`ONVO~NOFLLH¢V< W~ Kf Wr2 0 ¢ ZNWWW6 I r 6 \wG V V¢OVZ¢O..OWf»>f<¢in OV¢V« UCiWN<mZWKJY6VZ0 « LL'[UfV•NOJz • Y • i • Y Y • Y \ in rZ U 1 LL U Y Y. .. ~ • Y M 2 L Z • / Z 1- O / o u U L Y J FK i h< • O ~ Y LL YO • / O N f2F0 NV f2¢ M Z Y r.NFZ L WLL ¢00 KY LL Y Y 2 ."i WJ KUMOnO SZ Y • JL< VM Zr O 2¢ OTF¢ OLV wJ n1J p' F r p y wh VS<6 LLJ wVW 6pYSULLLOYOf atu ~nN<2 N2J ¢~ OMVYOw< <OiUU w00 11j w 1~ Y r00L2FOpr pSJ <OOFJ JW JY. NOLLWUwUU¢ 0 U l .. J q 0 1< Y K 1~1 • t JW¢ <O•.NZ JY2ZZZ2V nN 02<LY 1J0± •LLLJY1¢VVYD uYCNhJO ¢O[¢6 .f < r V • ¢O~ WzZJ wJ2 aONf¢¢N V zN OYWWWWwNWO< V 1d / 2 OWZO JWONwwOKZWWVI-w¢ NOZ JUF000000JfYh atN N tit w'( .Y Y'w< FY00 OI•N220 .O J¢M _ ___ iVa ul O..wVUVVOt4n JZZ¢fLR MpuLLZON m..101LLL S YLNwf f• OOJZ22Ny WWWOOY¢¢ •« « wLFli YZ• 22222000000.16666¢KpLL6>L4aCp¢i66p¢Ka¢¢NNNNNNNNNNNNNN •¢• drPrCJNPN d1.IP mOrrJNN n1.IPO NOm..NNPNw~IVNwNNm . OFO N..JNJmPa NNOPOn n0•.tlMmmOJN mJ•N oOm.. mN00PNTNTNr. nT F V1 N d 111 Y Z .• r..P N•1m r•1 Pn 0m•1 ..0 mm mTrv dMNNm ..NN NmnON gy<. ' I ~ ~ 11 > .. E E r .. r .: . OOm oOmOONmOm.~oONO •h mJOy ONOmOmN N~OJJN mN ~ \r NJh NJO m.pmmNn ryNOJ aN .-~ m N m J .y J H o r l• N m Z/ ry K r0 0P0 TJN JNONmPOw~NTJ Nhm •2r ¢O OOOOONwn •INNNnNNNNNNnTTmmTmTTT NNrvNrvNrvnNNNNNryN nNNNN o ~¢ a [ aeoaa a~oaoaaa Na,omamawmw mwmmmm m •K J'- hhh h.-hhnh,•nn w. n.n hhhhPN FI-hnh. -h r'•r~-hn iii r i i a U O h w \ J \ Y r • a N h m ~nnNmN «~uw r ~T! f qN! lJm6 ! ~ r m< hp IP •L p p / r r ti\!J o\~p V~ZFmZJ2 ~J2 fv p YN r oJVVKO ZaWNIW\W NI IN ! O <fl N\u 1 IWp<pN UJUN U6TN V U r h VZh J p0[m i J I-M Ff WJ> T• O\W VW UJwJOV> J w V¢1 mw 2Wp N¢O m u !]qo N • ¢Jh JJW}K • K fVK f\NONNp +~\~ N\ISK NSmJi mJ7<oJ•» w~J VY JWNN r2• OJ V<• \1. mlNm6m• m • 2LL niK N iZ V6 V6KWLL LLh! LLVW ! ~ m ON 209 OfNY ONNJ Vr0 ¢NfLLNN6> ~-J U'f ON~'Iw V¢JV ¢FV N O SU6 wl2 N0 JhNNF OV •<6pONLZ2Wf2JSWfm2NO¢ 2JV sm \FWNJwOwOJmw F• ~ rNj w OOtO •WhN wJNiRUiOZr~VN NVV mJFI LL ~S> OI< oJmY~79 Nfh Uq JV'O~ Om <NF2 V KSFOLLF2N Y2pN N2 J iN4 JJ fl-KtJK1. 9JW¢T'JOO¢ m NSJpVUWp6¢wmLLWfw wl J2W w¢i OQ SD Nr~~W> >J>~W WNN> ~^ ~ ti 1 h ViO LI Wwy-r VON¢0600KLLON6 Of < ; V 1- Y r ~ _ ZO • J• 20 w Zh0 wK w r i < CO •OK ~V U AV V fV ¢ZW O[ Z 2 FpVSY2LL 2 KyODLL NZ o aoor iw o~O Ni» .airN wo O Y M V LLYK ¢ Nh Oy NV NV •2FS X1 '¢VD 4 aqF' JJO_WN NLNi< T¢N ¢t• >D'JVV6w NK V MUU N2J3 UOWp10 6Y a N p 060 VJ h ^ • r ZJ¢DOLLLLNUZ NJ J ZOw K¢002 <2w Ktl<LZgJlp <NYN22W U w J WZNf1 O¢FO VS< Z¢• ¢ii • r • LVWOOWWLNMNWw}•M\JZTOfw O •w S1 V 1-Z¢22F 22 U' Jp Yq Wp0¢rMJFFI-'F q<wKJgZKZJO NI•m20 qr O OppFFFHFFO}• •S Ot9 WLEwf Zr N NNNNNNNUNNNf hFFtiJ 7'J» >il}l32}SINN ~ r¢r ror NHNT-0 NtlmP hNm^Pm hOmp o.. ncnacm •O/ T mJ.p N.1 N m N T m N r2r n T mTN NnT TTm mmTDNm m mT mT N ~ I D T a i a ~~;.~ _.R e; ..i ~ _ ~: .e _ s ~' _id! Ae I5= ~ _ ~ id ~ I ~y 8Ac'R=' F ~8p y 366 tlL IC ` F''A .... E R 0 i ~.. tl RC:,RB~ F: C .'l ~ 8 , ~ f'F hE G ~8 _ e :i 6i •r es ~~ s=` .. i s S~ Y ~ E l ~ c 4 .i. b ~.#f ~ ~ ~~i ~L' .,.. ;' ei c r E:9 sa s'~Fi a j i. ~ ~I e ~ 1 E ~ # L :s'ji y _ gg±j~ y$~( f q Y ~~=fit ~~ W 3y L~` -6~}: =~~~6 S ~Fa ¢ I MI I ~ ? _~ Jj 3 ~e ^ _ ~ ^I W sF _-sr:s _snsgzAC~atia q_ __ _ E_a¢? _ 5 £: ~° E'E. E. 4 _%cSQ _: E'].^_. p1iS RflaxS ~ ~ ,~dC ~ ^: Vy 'gE=EE%5E=_=vE E3 oScS $I aenS F.?£££££=£z?:@ w i5 i ^be~ # £ 5 ~i .~PiAF4. ^1~1~£RA ~AfE xifRS ~.~ A RCN< 8 ~' -~' Y'. BASER I:~F1g Rf.A~Al~a&~L ~~ F~iR ~: ° „ ~ A88R8888848888R68 A kS ~ =SEA 81 FE i 3cRi$§?~$F$Y$!$$4 ~ nA a YE:`4 ? fii s.". y-. ' s ~.F .@.&. 3{ $..$.S. s 3.$ .8. &.Y.3..8. -.--. # s'-. E s 8 ~ $ ~ i ~. R%88R886a8888888a R k8 C -^r S ° 8: A- ~"~ x" ~i R=R££~##~3ER£5HR.5$ = t'r'. k 5£^d £ $ ~~ £~ , ggII; bpi ~ K~: ~' °8%a%8R886S8%8888 R Sn~Y$$~$R$$~~$$~& a a$ - ~ xBG6 - vi3~ ~ - R a E~~ i'i #: c ~. ^ c E i F5A £,5 S.A93!£~H~.§, .~.~ £ k_' € -%Rn S .%: e .5 ..~ - _ R: ^ fififi ^ e . .RB~e eeBS°~ FB E.:e t &~ ; ' ~ ~ it Ms ~~ ~ [ ~ A~t ^ ~i g}~ ~G~i~p &gb~iii~~~ P0 ~ seg ~ s~ ~ z ~ ~ v ~i ! && cam--acc ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ i ~i~$~ICl KYtS a II~ C ~ ' r ~~e ~ ~ € p ~ c e p ~ g ~ s a ~ ~ W s 6 1' a E £. $ I ~1~6$$~Q~@Q~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ &~ ~ K ,. .. ,. ., ., 14 S' . ~. `sl 5 G , 5;, ~y g ~ . gWs . ~ s ~. ~d:a w : ;. .; e : r x n ~ wP ~ ~' E = _' S `. ~ , K' ~ ~ 'i ~. R L ~ YY y F ~F 6 (~~ ~ J F ~~ tl8 < ~$ K w ~ a" Y `ti xs R ' y .: uC S~ ~' 4T'. ~r V. ctj I ~, Y: % ~,, n ~, 3R `6 ~F, 8 ~R 8 F]) a y^_ c:.4 8R c G f ERRR 8 S & $€s£ ~ s - .R..~ R w ry .a. i~. •5 of^Y _i: c~ve._C•dd ^e R^ '$~RS° YST ge :: ~~GGtiiriGi QQr 3~~~s~9 ~i~fi ~ ~~y Y; i ~ ~ k O '~" P " 3 J, 3 ~~~+, d S c ~ & CC - RR Ri" .: Fp - - Zii X~`^ FE E ~ kk: I Rl 8 ~ ~CESC L ~ ~~ i ~ yY ~.^~.~5 " ~ 3I Y C: IG .: CM1 ~5.: .: [ - V 1 k" F 'S 8' Y' G G C .A a g _ z =v ^ T. e C i . t' ~I ^.2dN _ SA 'r. ~~i{A re s -Lr m ~ 5 is ar- ~'!~q k ~ ~ ~~ a ~ a ~ r « r s '~ ~ N "' C S Y g D 8 4 I S r ~ ~ p ~R ~~8R~ :: ~' ~ X ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 Y ~ r ., ~:- 16 ~ri~x ~r xexiv~n~ t,~x,runvivui+ STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager SUBJECT: REVISION OF SCHOLARSHIP POLICY RECOMMENDATION The Park and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council approve the attached revised Scholarship Policy. BACRGROIIND The City Council adopted the first 6cholarship and Naiver of Program Fae Policy. Since that time, staff and the Park and Recreation Commission have had one year to implement and review the policy. The Park and Recreation Commission has revised the attached policy and formalized the criteria and stnndards necessary to continua the implementation of the scholarship program. ANALYSIS The City's scholarship program was established through the receipt of donations by local service clubs. since that time the scholarship program has been supported by local resident donations and non^resident fees adopted by City Council in the Fall of 1991. To date, a total of $4,030 has bean provided to residents in acholnrships. The avernge scholarship amount was $32, although a few scholarships were granted Por over $100. During this last year, staff has evaluated the effectiveness of the program and has researched says to improve the program. The fcllowinq ere staff's racommendetions for revisions to the existing Scholarship Policy: o A scholarship Assistance Application form Por epplicents be established for submission to the Community Services Manager for review end approval (Attachment A). 17 CITY COUNCIL MEETING REVISION OF SCMOLARSRIP POLICY April 21, 1993 Page 2 o Utilize the Low Income Guidelines as established by the U.s. Departaent of Nousinq and Urban Development to determine Linancial eligibility for applicnnts. Current guidelines era attached for review. Since these guidelines change annually, their source is referred to in the policy but not the actual dollar amount. o Balance dollars available to the echolnrahips granted, thus ensuring scholarships are only granted when funds are available. o Provide limits for participntion in the scholarship program with a maximum of $6S annually per individual and $200 annually per household. o Authorize the Community Services Manager to review and approve Scholarship Aesiatnnce requests based upon the approved Scholarship Policy. o Establish specific deadlines !or application subiittals. Staff will continue to advertise the scholarship Assistance Program in The Grapevine and include a donation line On the class registration forms in The Grapevine. Availability of the scholarship program will nlso ba on flyers advertising the City~s Community services programs. Respectfully eubm% N~ UL / uz a Ota o nity Services Mnnagar SO/ICS/kls Attachments: Draft Scholarship Policy Attachment A (Scholarship Assistance Application) AttachmanL B (Scholarship income Guidelines) cc: Mayor and Members of the Clty Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department POLICY & PROCEDURE Rev. SII&7ECT: SCHOLARSRIP POLICY EFFECTIVE; (DRAFT) PURPOSE [I-03.00 The City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes the need to provide a comprehensive park and recreation program for the entire community, and where possible, recover direct costs of programming, including instructor fees, supplies, materials, equipment and administrative charges from those who participate. The City further realizes that some individuals will be unable to pay some or all of the expected program fees required of participants. The scholarship assistance policy is being implemented to ensure residents of the City with a means to participate in community Services programs should they require short-term financial assistance. GUIDELINES All requests for scholarship assistance will be submitted on a Scholarship Assistance Application form directly to Community Services Manager. Applications will be reviewed on a quarterly basis. Each scholarship request will be reviewed based on the following criteria: A) The applicant shall meet the maximum gross income criteria established by U.S. Department of Department o£ Housing and Urban Development (H.U.D.). Income levels will be verified by submitting a copy of the applicants ZR5 1040 Form or other proof of need (i.e., State or County Assistance Z.D. Number). S) The individual has not exceeded the maximum scholarship assistance amount for the Fiscal year July 1 through June 30. C) Individuals who have not participated or received scholarship assistance in the past fiscal year will receive priority over individuals who have received assistance in the past year. A completed registration form for the requested Community Services program must be attached to the Scholarship Assistance Application form (Attachment A). 19 SCHOLARSHIP POLICY Page 2 of 3 3. Scholarship requests will ba considered and granted on a "funds available" basis. 4. The Manager shall have the authority to grant scholarships on a partial or full fee basis or design a special payment plan for each case. At the end of each quarter the Manager shall submit a report to the City Council on the vse and status of the echolnrship program. 5. Scholarship participation will be limited to one scholarship per fiscal year with a maximum of $65.00 per individual or a maximum of $200.00 par household. Priority will be given to youth npplications. 6. For the purpose of this policy, the definition of "household", supplied by the Federal Government, is as follows: "Household" means a group of related or non- related individuals who are living as one econoaic unit and share living expenses. Those expanses include rent, clothes, food, medical bills, utilities, etc. Also includes households where a foster child or a group home wherein welfare or county or state placement agency maintains legal responsibility for the participant. It also means a single individual living alone. 7. only residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be eligible for participation. 8. No person will be discriminated against because of race, sex, religion or national origin. 9. All information on the application will be considered confidential and will ba used only to determine eligibility for the scholarship. 10. Scholarship requests can be eubmittafl up to a weak before the start of the program or until available scholarship dollars are expended, 11. upon receipt of the completed application and the program registrntion form, a hold will be placed for n spot in the requested program until a decision is made. All scholarships are subject to the same "specs as available" registration system. If the class or program ie full, the scholarship will be cancelled end the applicant will need to reapply. SCHOLARSHIP POLICY Page 3 of 3 12. The City shall use the Lov Income Levels ae supplied by the most recant revised income levels provided by the U.s. Department of Housinq and Urban Development (H.u.D.) Yor the San Bernardino County area. Those levels will be shown as attachment ^B^ to this document. /usr/acct/kathy/POLICY - scholarshiprev Attachment A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SCHOLARSHIP ASSISTANCE APPLICATION Please answer all the following questions. Also, attached is the policy which will be used In review your request for assistance. Completion and submission of this request does not guarantee approval. Scholarships are granted based upon funds available at tht time of the request. All information submitted will be held in strictest confidence. Applicant: Address: Work Phone: _. _.. _ Home Phone: L F'or what program do you wish to enroll? Attach the registration form. Class/Program: Class # Class Fee S Class/I'rogram: _ Class # Class Fee S Class/Program: Class # Class Fee S TOTAL: S 2. Who will he enrolling in this class or program? Name: __ Age: Name: _ Agc: 3. Requesting: (check one) FuII Scholarship Pazhal Scholarship ,_ If partial, how much are you able to pay toward the coat of the program? $_ 4. Please state the reason(s) for applying for scholarship assistance. 5. Household Annual Income; $_ o Attach current copy of employment check or check stub(s), or include State or County LD. number for assistance: __ __, n Attach copy of moat recent 1040 Income Tan Form (pages I & 2); OR n Provide other proof of need. SCHOLARSHIP ASSISTANCE APPLICATION Page 2 h. Number of persons residing in household: 7, Place of Employment: 8. Have you or your dependeo[s received scholarship assistance through the program before? Yes No _- 1( yes, Who: _ When; ,_ Application for each quarter are due no later than four days before the aDrt of [he program as space and funds allow. Applicants will be notified in writing following application submittal. Please mail or drop off this application to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department: Drop Off: 10500 Civic Center Drive Mail: P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Eor more information. call Community Services Department at 989-1858 I certify that ali statements on this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand that false or incorrect statements shall be sufficient cause for disqualification of my application request. Applicant's Signature •••"••••••••••••••••••FOR Stntus: Approved Denied Reason for denial.• Date: Signature OFFICE USE ONLY•"•••••""""""'••"•'• _ Funds Allocated: _ __ Date: Attachment B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SCHOLARSHIP XIfCOlB GOIDRLIIISS The City uses the Low income Guidelines of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ee a criteria to assist residents of the City Por scholarships to participate in programs and activities provided by the community services Department. These guidelines on household maximum gross income are as Follows: Household Size Gross Income Size Year 1 $23,000 2 26,300 3 29,600 4 32,900 5 35,500 6 38,150 7 40,750 S 43,600 !tt CJ'J'Y Ub' tiANCriO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Apri121, 1993 TQ Mayo- and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I SUBJECC: EXTENSION OF COMCAST CABLE T.V. FRANCHISE RECOMMF.NDATJON: Adoption of Resolution 91-012L extending Comcast's Franchise License for 90 days. BACKGROUND: The City staff would appreciate the opportunity to continue the negotiations with Comcast to ensure that every opportunity has been made available to Comcast to obtain a Franchise License. Resppectfully submitted, Susan Mickey Management Analys[ I SM:jls Attachtnent RF50II1PION NO. 91-012L A RF5CLi7TiGN OF THE CITY NgNCII, OF THE CTi'Y OF RAN(fI0 CUCAMJNGA, CALSFCAIIlPA, EXTFNDIIJG CQAilY OF SAN BAd1ARDIIJO FI7AN(7iLSE LICENSE Wi1H ^".~' bT CAAT.F ;.V. NL82 90 WYS UPON FXPIItATICY7 OF CSIItRFNP LICENSE 4JPIHIN THE CITY OF FFf1JCEI0 CUCAhLk]Gi! WfII~RFA.S, the Franchise Lic~vSe cyanted to Cwrast Cable T.V. by the County of San Bernardi3n and c~ardfathered into the City of Far~3w Cvramwga Will expire On April 30, 1993 atYl FnIFI2FAS, negotiations are ongoing 6etcttv'n the City of Farx3~o Cucamorya and Ca~rast ramble T.V. ; and W1Q~RFA.:, all terms and editions of the current license will continue the same. NOF1, THEREECH2E, the city Camcil of the City of Raix3w QramwlcJa does hereby resolve to extend the Frar++i ~.+ Licelvse far 90 days after the expiration of the current CamLy of San Hernarditro Lioerise. DATE: April 21, 7993 ~.,rrx ~r rsruv~nv ~~r;r+ivi~rv l.rv STAFF REPORT TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Debra Adams, City Clerk/Records Manager BY: Donna Kendrena, Secretary SUBJECT: DESTRUCTION OF CITY DOCUMENTS It is recommended that Ciry Council approve the Resolution granting authorization to destroy records listed on the attached form(s). BUILDING & SAFETY Under the authority of Government Code Section 34090, a department head may destroy certain city records which are two years old under his charge as long as such destruction is first approved by the City Attorney and City Council. Also under the same Govemment Code Section, authority is granted to destroy records which have been microfilmed. DA/dk attachment RESOUJf'IQi ~. g,~ - 081 A RESOIIIi'I0A1 OF '1f7E CITr O7fIIiCII. OF 'SfII: CITSC OF RAUCFID CUCAMR7CA, CALIFLH3IIA, AU1fARIZIIiG '1}tE DFSRd1CPICN OF CPM RDA ALID DOC[7gIiI5 4IIl1CH ARE NO ILP1GtSt RFRDIItFD AS Pl47VIDID IAmER GO'JEida¢Idi' LADE SfX.TS~I 74090 td~TiFAS, it has been determined that certain City recatcls ruder the diacge of the following City Depar'hneiits are ro longer r'gNired for public or private purposes: BUIIDING S SAFEfY WtIIRF7S, it has been darn„"tml that destructim of the above- mentioned materials is nmessary to axu^erve storage space, and reck~ce staff timer P~-T1CP, and confasim in handling, arcl informirc3 the public; and 4diERFnS, Section 34090 of the GOVerlLent Code of the State of California authorizes the head of a City department to destroy any City reoor'ds aTd doaments whidr are over two years old ruder his or her charge, witha~rt making a Dopy thereof, after the same are m lower required, vpur the approval of the City Council bf resolutiur and the written mnsenk of the City Attorney; and WHFRFIaS, it is therefore desirable to drstroy said rewYds as listed in E#iibit "A" attacte<1 hereto and nmde a part hereof, in storaye, without makiry a Dopy thereof, which are over two years old; and c~RFAS, said rewrcLs have been approved for destructiur by the City Attorney. NCk7, 7fD~FURE, this City CUUrcil of the City of Rarc3n Curamorga does hereby resolve as follows: SECPIQN 1: 'That approval and authorizatiur is hereby given to destroy those remnis described as E~Nribit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. S_FX:1'lOH 2: that the City Clerk is authcrcized to allow e~mmirration by and duration to the Dep3rpnerrt of Special O~llections of the University Research Tihrary, University of California, or other historical society designated by the city Camcil, arty of the records doscribed in E:dubit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, ewxpt those deemed to be wnfidential. S~f1CPTON 3: 7fiat ttw Cit;' Clerk =~a11 r~rtify to ttw adoptim of this resolution, and thenceforth and ther~safter the sane shall be in full forne and effect. GO ', .,.' ^.° PANCNC C:!CAKONGA "ASE: OA'c C'/"./93 ??KE: 12:'<:92C '4E cv"LlLW:4C 2EC:2CS Aoc e.Cyrn'J-eC -O4 CE5TRU7??CN. PEEASE :MO:CA?c ?4'E CES; 4=^ _:c>Cc":CY', S: GB AV'C RE?U4N '. -NE REC0,4CS MA4AGEKc.9? C'. P: S:^," °- ¢''.CR^.° ''-:SSEC SELCX KAY AL. FE CE5'RCYE".. % RE'A:1^'~;`:E 2Si',:E CA38E: W:'B 44 % =:3 !q9?45, ^E559CY*NE AES? 9:' _ .. 2ECC4CS CCCRCaA'CR: lEAC4, LL401 :E?'~:._ :EP- A'A•E: ?U'.';:%u d SAFE?" O:V VA!l SCRT: D4CNE: ;T,A )999-!95! E%?: 217C rA4K CA.cS ;Y` E.. - E7Y :CCE4-S 3EG!RN!NG E4C:VG ~ERrAVc.4? SECORO C?R. DES?RCY 4E'4?E'!AL 9C% 8C% NC, :LCA??C4 Bcx !2-!991 CATC. SE4? ?C: 503 C=-u3-0. '2-''.452 - 'tz- o ::A'. ° ?LAN C4EC3 E%P:RAT:C9 !LL V V - CSC.40 C/C!/90 12/3C/9C ;':z- . E%e!4A'?CT ?tA4 CRECR, !99C Oc G/0!/9C !2/3Ci 90 -c':e- n 3 eLAR :°.ECS E%'ENS!0,4 :UL - GEC, 90 Ot/C1/9C !2/30/90 c'2e- ' C': c: C.4?!C9 C° P!.1.4 ChECA E%P?W??CN JAN - .CN, 9C C!10!/9C 121?C/9C -- ° >'A4 rucC% E%?E4S iCN :A4 - NW, 30 C!/O1/9C '.2/3C/97 .. - 9 JE44" a°,A5? CCRRESD d rENCS '90 ^,!/0!190 !2/3C/9C °c'.:e• c ':4 NAR'!4 CC93ESP S 8EMC5 '90 7t10!/9C !1/30/90 c'tle 4:C°AR^ C'J~4^.E P.C39ESe 5 !'EKGs '90 :!/".!/9C !1/3C/4C + °o':e• ? 9 CENN?5 S'CU? WRRESD d KeYCS' '9C C!/0!/90 12/30/9C YP^.E °REE40 CCR,RESP 6 KEK.^,5 '9C C/^.'/90 ;2/30/90 :"e- " ,4CY LPN CCRRESP 6 vE,r,CS 'S0 "';0!/90 !2/3C/90 :'-e- : ii:". GCr=: CCRRESP 6 Kc.KCS '90 C:/T./9C :2/30/90 -„ .• a '3 '_CvC 90CL43" CnP,gEco 6 NE.k15 '9C C!/0!!90 !2/30/90 - ::z- a •- !:v ~p,C°45 CC4RESP d K,5*,7S '4C C!/0!/9C 12;30/90 -.. - . 'v 5C°RCEOER C0,43ESP d KEKOS '97 C'/0!/9C 12/?C/90 :':e- ' '! ~°C VCS::" CORRESP d v,ENCS '9C 71; C;/9C !1/30/90 'e'.'e• = ? VA 2" 4ACE4: CCRRc.SP 6 VEK?S '9C C:/0!/90 !2/30/90 :'9e- ~ ''{A'-l' ^OrE.LA CCRRESe d KENDS '9C C!/01/9C 12/3^/97 :'ez• " .'C4N 'OfvAS C^.R~4E54 S ME'ACS '97 C^./0!/9C '2/30/90 c`dz' : C: CA.Rl95 S:-VA CCRRES~ 5 VENCS '9C C'•/0!/90 12/30/90 o'der " EEVERA: CORRESP790E4CE - :N Obr.!/9C !2/30(90 -c"CZ- 22 :GCE V°.:01CA':CNS Cf/C!/4C !2/30!90 °a'.+e• > 2. 009E Y'.0!A'iC4 - CORRE3PCKCENCc- Ni C1 /0!/40 !2/30/90 "e'ee- '+ 11 EVPEC°EES REm'ES? FOR LEAV°. C!/C!/9C :2/30/90 a':z- ; 25 ^^WC CCR4ESeONOENCE - !4 C!M.'/9C 11/30%90 - 2c cyG:N'c_7:43 CO,44ESPC4Cc-VCE - :N C'/C7 /90 !2/30/90 °c'ce.- ~ 2" pOeC CC39ES?04CFACE - ;4' ^.+/C'.I90 ".2/37/90 c'Ee• t 2E vErCS - :4 ^'!A!/90 !2/3C/9C c'ier ' ~ 2°. SA4 EER4A?C:VC CC'J4"' ?ERG REPCP? T./01/90 12130/90 ' c', CZ- s 3C A':'MCR!2A';CV ?C CS?A!1' 01/C!/9C 12/30/90 ' ' ~~ P..4V C°EC Y d PS?`!:* CCR~RESDCNO C3/C /9C 2/30/90 av 4E!C " 4c.E 01-03-03 1 !2-1992 ' ~ {~fl ~ iM~ 'l ~. bW ~'ry.~. ,.. '}. ••~~n'4~'~i ' ' 3aie : ~~ 7S 'A'EN? 4EA^. Oa:c: ASS?. ^?',V AT'CQNEY ~ ~. .. ~ '4 ^ -.'° 0° RANC'C OUCANONGA .-,..., .- Yc9 ~-., -r. qe.M,. ~A"r. ~, 7ATE: C'/"193 T?NE: 12:'.!:',10 E °;..^.r.?K7 R.;Ci7S A:c :,, _,J:E: FOR CESk'C'!7k. 0!EASE ;k7?:}'e -u: +cc:S^ -?^°••:.^•:. S:Gkcdv7 'vE?;,!R1' i.7 T!!E RECCR7E NAVAOENEV' 1 ~j~ [ 'y "C ~~ OE n V}v 0= i VCS CC1':5.. Y :.RCS _. _.N AL- . 7?$.9C..~. X RE-A:\~;?' 'E;9RC5 NA.4YEC N:TP. A9 X °7R N04^?$, 0E5'R^Y ruc qcc- .. _ .. -.. RECDRC$ :^-7R0'.VA?CR: !EACP.. L:v7A -n> ...: :E" 4ANE-. ?::; :vG 5 SAE"• 7?'1 N0.?'_ ?OR`. __-__-..__.-_______-_.____.._-____-_______^ _c..__.-____.___. NARY .AT.$ r y'. EYE+" 39X L7\'P'-c 9FGLNk?k0 EV7;NG . - E:.vY: $?7p 3: v0'iCE$-NARCc .~ - ?c:OS7 2L ?CS Y7" CE$-ARR?'. - ? GECCkO RECNEOtt 4Ci. ICES-NAv 'der ~ c ~ EC.vC .RE75E7tt 4C'':FS-JO4E ':e^ - $E>`747 REC°ECg 9C*:CE$-. nv .'ce- % ECOY: ?ECryECY VCT:CE5-AUGUS`, ~'ce- ' ' $ECC;C RECUOCN VC'i CES-SEDTEN9ER . > ""7 4E: E3Y 5C- ^cc_2CTC9ER r cE:C\7 Ryc".!, VT :C$E-479RN8'R ,.... ?EC7v7 RECuE:% ACT?CE$-OECEN9E3 - SR5- 3E0°,~ Y "C'::cc .°E?AUAR° =o'te^ i '2 °:RS FEC4ECX 1'CT:CE5-NAAOM. - - - c: RS' gE7uc0Y VO':CE$-NAY -..c' -:RE' ?G7uEw, 90''7`.5-.".'yc -.'Jr • ;G~ REC9E0N '!C^.7E5-?ULv -.'.:z- ='OC' Rc.04E0Y 40"7EE-A',!G'.E. - .. =:R=- 'ECuEOX VC'?0EE-$Eorcy?cq `a e- • '• c•ee- RE°uE0". V0'?0E$-0C'75ER c'[e- n ,, c;Rc- gcO,ECv. VT?CES-9CYc.N"EA . [2-' =;fi' 3 vN E7°, YT. -ne0e~oeo . "e^ . 23 '950 " ?EC. 4E0 ~E7Y 4c.2L?EE ~:a'. ~''".7° .6v0 ~E'x!;' c?:` ;;' ,'/:'197 06 /30 /9C ~4C9E: ;'14;499.195? EXT: 2277 ~54NANE!4T RE70R7 CTR. DESROY RETRiEVAI 90X 9C% Y0. LOCA?30N 9cx 12-,992 70.?E 5EV' ?°: 2 r:1!9C '3/37 /on 2 ~r/c~ 02 /F'/90 1 /.. ^.2/0'./97 '2/3".197 72/0'.190 12/?C/9C CZ/C!/90 12/37/9: C2/7!/9C 12/37/97 C2/^.;/97 '2130/90 72/0 1/90 '1197/94 :2/0'14: !1/?0190 72/0!/90 !2(30/97 02/0 1/97 '.2!30(90 02/71/90 !2/30/97 02/01 /90 ?2; 3:;'9C .210'.(90 !2/30/90 02/^'/9C '2/3C/9C :2/.'./99 '2/30/97 0210'/°.: 12/?0/90 ".2i ^'.1O.C 12/3"./90 :2/;1/97 12/30/90 02/:'!40 12;30/90 ".2/^.ll47 '2/30/97 02!01/90 '2/30/90 $-'! 04-C?-^3 S !2-!951 -;';ic^ A ;04744°. '990!°.7-",7" i°qU 90-'S7 'C'. /97 95/30/90 :e^ : Jaq..A7 c?;: a7_.S, •°52 S0-?"c. ['/9: OS/?0/9C . ,evLAR° 'col/90.3'E '0F':' 9" "'/^^'/9^. OE/30/97 _ - !AYCpcv '990190-0.^.: "RL 99-902 C'r^.'/9C 09/30/40 -~''Cer " ' -- 5",PRA '090/99-9:3 `PR7 90-',759 :'./:+/97 0$/?0/97 °a'". e- ; :094':05° '.990/90-i CE9 'HRU 20-12'~ "'/7'/90 7$/?0/90 c':er : cc?RUAR" 1999!90-'273 '4RU 90-'c.70 0'/N 790 ^.6/3C/9C :'',ce, p p crogppgv '.590/90-IS03 rHR,: 9:-1525 ~ i ///Q{h/_///9''/90 005/37_/97 ".._ R 'MEM> HEAC 7aEe: A$$!. v;?Y A. C pAA~~~FF 0.•v pc ?0.9CpC OCCA'xC!9GA rvc v0.: h;F2 ?E00403 ARE SC°ECU'EC °CR CE6?RGC*!C,R. ? EAEc_ !9C!CA'c •.c +cG•¢cn !eoCS[?:Oy, 9;CN ANC oe-•-~gp •C 7vE RECC2C5 4AYAGESey, .i.-. y~, R.., _. :CX YAY ALL CE 0E5?MYEC. X 4ETA:`. r...- P.CRC6 •A?%EO W:"+ AR X E0A '!0!9^!6, Cc.G'40Y T°? RE°• 3"- -. -.. ~4E00R05 000A0!RA'C9; LEAC°~ :!%CA 70E~- . .. ;°v- VAHC.: 9L":C'A3 6 SR'E'° C!V w,A!L SCRT.: P509E: !'!t;969-?66? E%*: 22CC Cp 44 0A•cG 'X` °.: cC% 00; '0.2 9EG!Y3!49 EyC!y'C wAR^'- .9;/r_,cc0 .uRO gC-2nne Np?C° '99C; ?.-20'^ nP' 90-2275 +1P 40° '.i97/90-2205 ?PR'J 96-2369 :'ce- " 2 BARCH 'E9"./9C-23^C ?Y.AL' 97-2558 -c':e- ; + ePR:- '957/9C-2:59 TtlR.' 90-26'.6 :': e• _ ': 4"R:: 199:/op_2oc? Tryp~ 90-3084 - - c, p'?: '99C/°.^.-3061 TRR:' 9C-3269 C:e- ; 5 APR!'_ !99C/9C-3197 ?4,R.' 90-3fifi3 - RP° '49^./9^-355E ?4R0 90-36!9 -_•.,:e- ~ o wpv ,090/90-39'9 ?4RL' 9C-dC6l °~':e' '9 °.pv ?990/90-4066 T°AL' 9C-1245 - wAV ^590/9C-1295 ^'AO og_tc3y -. -- -::~E '99:+90-1533 'R R:' 90-47 -':e^ .. .'. yE '030/9^-!'02 ?HP,J 90-1035 '-r' ~ -,°, Ay;' c?":• v:LE CCU :'./Y /90 '2/30!90 OORA!AFE9T RE0'0R0 0', R. OES?RC°. RETRIEVAL 3C% °0X N7. LOOP?!C". Ccx 12-!992 CA?E 6E4T ?C: ""0'./40 C6/?^-/S0 7:/:!/9C Cfi/?0/97 C1lC ./9C CS/3C/90 .?/C1/9C 76/3C/9C 0./C?/97 O6/30/9C 7?/0^, /9C 76/30/90 =!/0!/97 06/30/9: 0!/77/90 06/30(97 0'./0?/9C 06/30/99 0!/0!/90 06!30/90 C?/^.!/9C Ofi/30/90 ^VC1/9C C6/30/9C C!/C?/9C 76/30/97 0'./0!/90 n-:/30(90 '0' ".C-03-03 3 !2-?492 "- ' - .-._ ":^+g 3-c.029 'H 4C 9^.-E36! .0E/.n'/9C lt'30/90 ~,wc +qor/9:-535E "1R:' 9:-L05: C6/[i/9C '2/3C/SC -c'oer 7 . .. v ,cc.'4C-ES3 '4,4:' 9^.-559°. 05/07/90 '2137/90 - - 7090/90-iE59 "P. C' 96-5931 OS/^.'/90 12/30/90 :'"er t . '9°.,/90-:93: -..°S'J on_519E' C6/0!/9C 12/30/90 c':e' = ..- '^S:/9^-5'S' '440 90-54ec C6/C!/90 72/30/90 a':xr "• OOSOS? '9?0/°.0-54?5 tiRC 90-66d9 CS/0'/9C !2/30;90 .a- >' ° A:'GJ5- 'C°.7/90-65v,0 ?R 4U 9:-E9'2 76/C 1/9^. !2/30/90 o':e; x ^. AL'S'i5' 1990/90-59?3 ?HR7 90-7?52 06/01/3.^ '2/30/9^. - AUGU°.• 'S ^.0/90-"'S3 '4?'J 9^.-730^ 05/^.;/aC '2/30/90 clEer G ° iE~`Ew6E.¢ '990/90-1308 ?!!M' 9:=c-99 C6/0!/9C !2/30/90 y de- ~ p cco•EwEE~ '397/9'".-v60Y..y4:; 90-ia-. C:i:'./°.i !2/30/9^ c'de^ ! '; i6o•cwocq •990; on_7o.o •°40 9C=9n.2 05/0'/90 12/30/90 d:e• : 'G C., ,.-; '990 /90-'903 '°R:: 90-E'2] OEM.!/90 1,/30/97 ,'. ier : .C'C9°i '99"/9C-4'2' 'NRL' 9C-942' 0S/C'/5: !2/30/90 . ...._~ t •. CEE¢ 'A9"/90-61'5 ?°.¢L' 9C-9610 O6/7'/9C '1/30/90 c'ie^ 7 " 4; /E+14ER '990/90-4611 ?!!RL' 90-9862 ",6/C!/9^. 12/70/90 °o'Ce~ ~ 5 R CVE!8'_4 1990/90-9613 T9 R:' 90-101 d0 C 5/ 0?/97 12!30/90 ~ yy Qp,~ / /~~ / - ~ . f Ca :e: ~.'wR!` .EAC late: ASE?.:' A sv S~ ~; ~'> ~.. {u y °•1. r^f l! i '..nom r~ :~: ,~' :J ~~. C:?Y Cf RAACNO CJCAEgNGA Cesbdr io^. No;'.f'caac Reccrt ?AGE: CA?E: 0!/!1/96 TIMc--: 12:!1:!90 THE fCLlCN:1': RE'JCRCE ARE G.^I',EC.'LEC fCR CESTRL'CilOM. PLEASE INDICATE -uc CEST6cC <aOG:'iCN, 5569 A90 RE?URq TC THE RECORCS NARAGENE9T ^:V:S:M ~E RECORCG L:G'cD SELOX XAY ALL GE DESTROYEC. % RE`.A:!! •°CSE ECOROS '!A9%ED X'.1M AN % fOR AMM;I!l1HG, DES?ROY ?ME RES? -._ :: !;T9 RECORDS COGRDS9ATOA: LEACH, !'.8911 - ;~~.~.: CEr' : !9'E CEPT HAeF- 9OILCIVC S SAFETY OP! .MAIL SOR?: PHONE: (711)969-t69',• E%1: 22D) ~AR!1 CATES PEPolANEMT RECORD CTA. DESTROY REIRIEYAL 80% !X; EVc.N' 9CX C^.N?E9TG OEuSNNSNE EYCSNG 9'OI( NC. LC'A^OA Sox '.2-!992 CA1E SET!' ?O: =c':z- "- '9 :SCcR3eq +oeC ioy+~~!' THRL' 90 ..<2- CE/0'/9- ../ /9C ..- - .. CcCE`9ER 199D/90-!C129 ?HRU 90-!065! ,p~~ D6/0!/90 !2/GD/90 Ca:e: .?NEXT Ha.AC Case: ASST. CSTY A??ORNEY E1S91~E 80%EG ON !!OLO 6071E9 NEEDJBG TO BE REttttdEO fOR 7E9TAIP.'T10N 0 w' 90XE5 ?D BF 7ESTAOYEO ;Srcl;kiny :hon Mich aua! be RETUAXEOJ 4 ,, .« }~.R 5 A.f.',ni : 4 ~, "~'~ l.:' t- ----- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ftEPOftT DATE: April 21, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, CNy Manager //~;/ FROM: Ruben Dominguez, Administrative Services DkegoW ((J! / BY: ,ban A. Kruse, Purchasing Agent SUBJECT: AppgOVAL TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO ENTER INTO ALEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH MUNICIPAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. That Council adopt Resolution No. 93 - eBrL which will enter the City of Rancho Cucamonga into a lease/purchase agreement with Municipal Services Group, Inc. (MSG, Inc,), for vehide acquisAion. The Purchasing Divisbn solicited quotes on behaN d the Maintenance Department for one (1) twee-a~cle, front-end Bader tmdc and one (t)cab-chassis tna:k wNh a regenerative street sweeper. The Bader ttudc is a new vehicle and the sweeper is a replacement vehicle. Both purohases were awarded by City Council on FebMary 17, 1993, and March 3, 1993, respemivey. Both trucks are budgeted for one lease/purohase payment per year for five (5) years. Each payment wIN be E25,293.06. The acwuM m;,7lber for these payments b 09.4637-7045. At the February 17, 1993, Council meding, the approval of the lease/purchase payments for the front eM Bader was based on a 6.28% interest and did not IntNUde sales tax. In addNbn, the sales tax was rot included in tfw 5.67% base/purchase payments for the sweeper awarded on March 3, 1993. However, stall has decided to finance at 5.87% for bdh vefliGes. The total amount is Men spNt IMO two (2) even payments of 525,293.08. This increases the savings to the City by NnancMg both uru7s together. Municipal Services Group, Inc. offers a (ease/purchase rete of 5.67%, bwer than other rates quoted on bid packages received, Pnme rate is cumeMy at siz (6) percent. In addMbn, the CNy cuReMy has a master lease agreement wNh MSG, Inc. for Mro patch tacks. Thb new lease/purohase agreement would be an addendum to the master lease, Funhemgre, MSG, Inc. ,has worked weN wgh Me current lease and are very helpful when the City has any questions or ooncems. Respectfully submAted, /// / _ Rotiert-G. Domindugf Administrative Servces Department RD/JAWmem Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 93- OOH A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEASE/PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT THROUGH MUNICIPAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined Lhat a true and very real need exists for Lhe acquisition of the equipment described in the Municipal Master Lease and Option Agreement No. 464-I (the "Agreement") presented to this meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has taken the necessary steps, including any legal bidding requirements, under applicable law to arrange for the acquisition of such equipment, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby directs Lhe City Attorney to review the agreement and negotiate appropriate modifications to said agreement so as to assure compliance with state law and local statutory law, prior to execution of the agreement by those persons authorized by the City Council for such purpose, 8E IT RESGLV ED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that: Find ina: Authorized Officers. The terms of said Agreement are in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the acquisition of such equipment and the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga designates and confirms .lack Lam, AICP City Manager and/or Rooe rt Dominguez, Administrative Services Director to execute and deliver, and to witness (or attest) respectively, the Agreement and any related documents necessary to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement. RESOLVED, the acquisition of the equipment, under the terms and conditions provided for in the Agreement, is necessary, convenient, in the furtherance of and will at all times be used in connection with the City of Rancho Cu camon ga's governmental and proprietary purposes and functions (e zcept to the extent that subleasing of the equipment is permitted under terms of the Agreement) and are in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and no portion of the equipment will be used directly or indirectly in any trade or business. O BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized and directed to fulfill all obligations under the terms of the Municipal Na stet Lease and Option Agreement No. 464-1. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 21st day of April, 1993. I, Debra ~. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, held on the 21st of April, 1993, and was adopted at said meeting oy the following vote: AYES: CDUNCI LMEMBER6: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED; CDUNCILMEMDERS; ABSENT: COUNCI LMEMBERS: s7i) CITY OF RANCHO C[iCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 '~° TO: Mayor and Members of the City Countll Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager PRO!!: Ijnda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager BP. Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A LOAN TRANSACTION WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. RECOMII~NDATION Approve a loan transaction In the amount of $3,801.280 with the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. At the December 16, 1992, meetlrtg, the Redevelopment Agency approved the acquisition of two pieces of property from the Cfty. Additionally, a one time reimbursement of funds advanced by the City 1n the development of Central Park was authorized. ! The Agency acqutred the two pieces of property, the Fire Headquarters/EOC site and the City Yazd surplus site, in February, 1993. The reimbursement of Central Park expenses oleo has been paid. Under the scenario approved by the Agency and Clty, these funds w1ll now be borrowed by the Agency, Increasing the outstanding principal amount of the loan from the City to $9,484,605. Because the Agency can only collect tax increment revenue io the extent It has outstanding /ndebtednese, this Increase will allow the Agency to capture its full amount of annual revenue. This action wdl have a neutral eHeM on Agency and City tend balances. This action Is >n addition to the annual loan transaction between the Agency and City. Reapeetrully submitted, Lida D. Daniels Redevelopment Manager cr17 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Apr11 21, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, C1ty Manager FROM: W1111am J. O'Ne11, C1ty Englneer eY: Dan James, Seinor Civ11 Engineer SUBJECT: DECLARATION OF ROADWAY EASEMENT FOR APN 1062-071-08, 5702 AMETHYST AVENUE THE FORMER SIGHT OF LEDIG HOUSE RECOMMENDATION It 1s recommended that the C1Ly Council declare Assessors Parcel 1062- 071-08 an easement for roadway and related purposes and authorize the Mayor and the C1ty Clerk to sign the attached Declaration of Easement and to cause same to record. NACKGRDUIO/AMALVSIS The C1ty acquired the subJect parcel and the Historic Led1g House In October of 1987. The Ledig House was recently relocated and now 51ts on the south east corner of Hellman Avenue and Wilson Avenue. The previous site of 5702 AaetQyst Avenue is now Wilson Avenue east of Hellman Avenue. The attached declaration for your consideration is to officially declare the land a street as 1t 1s currently being used. Respectfully submitted, ~~~,~.`~ W1111am J. 0 N~1 City Englneer NJO:DJ:JH Attachment a; a~ ~ a' rq yl ~ ~g L n ~ ~ L '~ N 1 Q N n ' -~-133M1S -- ~ - -1SAH13WV - Z " ~ ~ n . .~. m ~ p~ roi x'i L S 3L ooh e^' °IS ~M1 ;ozLS14°~ ~° ZZ.LF O , ^ n `qa :o ~ E 4 r m ~ ~ ~ ~, O ~ ~ Y i n7 y N }~ ¢ ~ W a y d H ..~ ~ orcv/ soi ~.~ ios N ~ N zr ~ ^ °m Q m ` `~3' O ~ ~ .~ " N Sao .p. ~ sti ~ © s ...~~FI ufi'%/ Q, ' J O N Q N© n ctv °~ • k O a ~ m ~ e M O \ ~ ~~ 1 1 9!'NS 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: RELEASE OF AN E%ISTIN6 AND ACCEPTANCE OF A NEW REAL PROPERTY IIpROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON ALMOND STREET, ADJACENT TO 9400 ALMOND STREET, SUBMITTED BY RANDOLPN SCOT OAVIS AND SANDRA PAULINE OAVIS - APN: 1061-491-01 RECOMMENDATIpI It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached Resolutions releasing an existing and accepting a new real property improvement contract and lien agreement, and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to record same. BACKGRDUIb/ANALYSIS A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was approved Dy the Council on November 18, 1992, and recorded on December 16, 1992, as a requirement for the construction of living quarters within a barn on the property. The agreement was 9or construction of missing street Improvements adjacent to the property. The property owner 15 now processing a Development Review (DR 92-I1) for a new house' on the property. The review of the new application reveaied that additional improvements may be needed (i.e. storm drains and a parkwaly community trail). Therefore, the new real property improvement contract and lien agreement will include both the previous street improvement and the new stone drain and parkway troll requirements. A copy of the agreement is available 1n the City Clerk's office. Respectfully su ltted, ~~~ William J. 0 it City Engineer NJO:SM:d1w Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 9~,? ~ (J $3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RANDOLPH SCOT DAYIS ANO SANDRA PAULINE DAMS WHEREAS, the City Council of the Ctty of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 92-285 accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Randolph Scot Dav15 and Sandra Paul lne Dav15; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on December 16, 1992 as Document No. 92-517386; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is no longer required, because 1t is to be replaced by another. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED that the City Council of the Ci>tiy of Rancho Cucamonga does he,eby release said Real Property Improvement Contract and L1 en Agreement from 9400 Almond Street (See attached Exhibit "A") and that the City Clerk shall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. RESOLUTION N0. ~3, ~ 8~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO WCAMONGA, RCCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM RANOOLPH SCOT DAMS AND SANDRA PAULINE DAVIS AND AUTHORIZING ^lC MAYOR AND CITY CLEPo( TO SIGN THE SAME NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for construction of public Improvements in con,~unction with building permit issuance; and WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, drive approaches, sidewalk, street lights, street trees, storm drainage facilities, and a parkway community troll established as prerequ/site to issuance of building permit for a single family residence at 9400 Almond Street has been met by entry Into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Randolph Scot Davis and Sandra Pauline Darts. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES to accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the MAyor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same 1n the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. 41 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,u rs Cif N 1T1E11:-vlczr~Irr nuP ~~ GIlN ACRCFMFNP -DAMS IIVGII~fEEERINO DM9ION E7lI~Il'r "A' CJ't7 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ~- DATE; April 21, 1993 70: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FAOM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING Tiff. ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR REFUNDING BONDS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 85-PD RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution which approves the engineer's refunding and reassessment report for refunding bonds in assessment district 85-PD. BACKGROUND: Because of recent declines in interest rates it has become feasible for the City to consider reducing costs by refunding the original bonds sold for assessment district RS-PD. The attached resolution approving the engineer's report is a necessary step for the City to refund the bonds and realize the cost savings. The engineer's report confirms the total amount of principal and interest m be refunded and the rate and amount of bonds to be sold to accomplish the refunding including all costs. Also included in the report is a listing of what each rcassessmcnt will be for each parcel in the district as well as a diagram showing the boundaries of the district. As proposed this refunding has the potential of saving the City in excess of S2 million over the remaining life of the bond issue. For this reason, ste(f is recommending approval of the attached resolution. R/espectfully Submitted, L' ;000C.fL~C~/• ifs-G'-~.- ~uane A. Baker Assistant to the City Manager DAB/dab O RFSOISIl'ICN N0. 93- ~ O -~ A RESOLUPICN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tifl; CITY OF RAN[7D CU'ANLkdGA, CALIFORNIA, APPHI7VIN"' REF@IDING AND REASSEiS- "1FIdP REPOIQ' OF ENIGIIJEEEi AND ODNFIRPD:NG AFASSESSN~R5 Nt'Ni RENZIhd)ING BCNOS IN A SPECIAL, ASSESS[42IP DISTRICT WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CP17 OF RAN7D CUCANLNCA, CALIFORNIA, did previously urdartalae proceedings aid cronfivs assessmnts in a special assessment district n+~+++'a~t to the terns aryl provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highwys Code of the State of California, said special assessment district lue~m and designated as ASSESSFIHJp DIS1RICf N0. 85-PD (Fwreinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and WHta"TEAS, improvasent fiords zepresenting the unpaid assessments within said Assessment District were issued aid sold in the manrax provided in the "Liprovanent Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streeu and Highways Code of the State of California; anti, WHEREAS, at this time, this legislative body has initiated proceedings to refuM all outstanding improverent bonds pursuant to the Fefuidirg Act of 1984 for 1915 Ifr4rcoveme7tt Act Bonds^, being Division 11.5 of the Streets end Highways Code of the State of Californde, said refurrling buds aid district to be designated as ASSES,44ENI' DISTRICT N0. 85-PD-R (REFUNDING) (hereinafter referred to as the "Refurcling District"); and, WlLEREAS, this legislative body has previously orrYsed the prnparation of a Report, said Report to generally contain the following: A. A schedule setting forth the unpaid principal flrd interest on the improvement bonds of the original Aasesmrent District to be refunded and the total arounts thereof; B. A total estimated principal amamt of the reasaesament and of the refurdirxl bottle and the maximan interest rate thereon, together with an estimate of coats of the reaeaesmnant and of issuing the refunding bonds, including all coats of issuing the refuidirg bonds; C. The Auditor's Record shaving the schedule of the principal instalL~nts and interest on all unpaid original assessments and the total anowrts thereof; D. The estimated amount of each reassessment, identified bl' reassessment number corresponding to the reassessment number on the reassessment diagram, together with a proposed Auditor's Record for the reassessment; E. A rnasseasment diagram showing the Refunding District aid the boundaries end dimensions of the subdivision of lard within the Refunding District; and, WHEREAS, this legislative body has row ra:eived sib considered the ..Report" of the Engineer and is ready to proceed to malae certain findings and approve the "Report" of the Engineer. NOW, THEREFtlRE, the City Council of the City of Ranch Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SEC12~1 1. That the above recitals axe all true and rnxect. SECTION 2. That the "Report" of the EYgineer entitled "REFZAID- ING AND RF.ASSESStgM' ENGII~ER'S REPOIa"' is herofN approved, aryl it is hereby determi-ned by this legislative body that the following coalitions have been satisfied: A. That each estimated annual installment of principal and interest on the reassessment is less than the corresporduiq annual installment of principal and interest on the portion of the original assessment being superseded and supplanted by the same percentage for all subdivisions of laai within the Assessment District; B. That the number of yeazs to maturity of all refurding bonds is ro more than the number of years to the last maturity of the bonds being xefurded; C. That the principal aercxmt of the reassessment on each subdivision of land within the Assessment District is less than the unpaid priroipal anount of the portion of the original assesmrent being superseded and supplanted by the same percentage for each subdivision of lard within the Assessnent District. SECTION 3. That the reassessments for the xefurdinq boats and the contributions fxvs the existing fulls of the Assessment District, set forth in the "Report", are hereby approved and confisned, and a copy of this (desolation shell be entered upon the minutes of this meeting of the legislative body. SECTIQ4 4. Ttris legislative body hereby authorizes the issuance and sale of refunding bonds to reittesent all urgraid reassessments pursuant to the ternis anti conditions of the Bond Indenture previously approved this legislative body and the Bond Auchase Agreanentt approved by this legislative body on this date; provided further that said horde shall bear urtemst at a rate rot to emceed the maximvn legal rate of 126 per annum, and shall also be issued in the manner as provided by Chapter 3 of Division 11.5 of the Streets all ttighaeya Code of the State of California, and specifically the "Reftuxting Act of 1984 for 1915 Impmvarent Act Bonds". The last maturity of said refuridinq horde shall not exceed the number of years to the last maturity of the horde being refunded of the original Assessment District. SECTION 5. The original reassessment, together with the reassessment diagram, as set forth in the Refunding and Reassessment ldaport of the Engineer, shall inmadiately be xecnrded in the Office of t~s Superintendent of Stxeetg. Imrediately ther~nfter, a copy of the reessess- ment diagram shall be filed in the Office of the County Recorder and a Notice of Reassessment, zeferercing said diagran, shall be rncoxded in the Office of the County Recorder, all pursuant to the provisions of Division 4.5 of the Streets and Highueys Coda of the State of California, and speci- fically Section 3114. Upon the recordation, the reassessments shall becare liens upon the various parcels of property and land asse..ssed as shown on the reassessment diagram. SECTION 6. A copy of this Nesolutiat confirntlttg the reassess- ments, which reasaesarenta dull constitute the security for the refutding bonds, shall be Eiled in the Office of the Treasurer, std the a+~rr+.a shall keep the zeoord showing the several installments of principal std interest on the reasaessoents which are to be collected each year during the term of said bonds. An annual apportion of eech reasseasnent, tth~e s~maer i~mer std atnthe sare~timadaM~l~the ems ans' talltml~ii~ase the general property taxes of the County std shall be payable std. hecure delitquetit at the sore time and in the sa® pmportionate amount. Fach year the annual inst,.i t..o.te shall 6e submitted to the County Auditor for p~uposes of collection, std the Courty Iaditor shall, at the close of the tax tolls=tirg season, pcvnptlY xrsder to the '~>r,++~+r a detailed report showing the amount of such installments, interest, penalties and percentages so collected. SECPICN 7. Ths lien of the original assesarettts shall rot be superseded aM supplanted ea to all unpaid installinarts of assesare~tts origirully levied std the penult ise std interest thereof. Pbr purposes of this Section, "unpaid installments" means installments which are delinquent and those which ere ar cony he posted to the ter roll for the fiscal year during which the xeassesm~tt herein is oonfimed. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage std adoption of this resolution and thereupon std rb.mft~ the sane shall take effect end be in full Force. PASS®, APP80VF9, std AO~1~ this day of , 1993. AYES: NOES: ABSFS/r: ATI'ESP: City Clerk `ic) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE April 21, 1993 TO Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant [o the City Manager SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION MAKING AWARD FOR SALE OF REFUNDING BONDS FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT' 85-PD RECOMMENDATION; It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution which approves the sale of the re[unding bonds for assessment district 85-PD. The resolution also stipulates that the refunding bonds will be sold with an underwriters discount not to exceed 1.5% and an interest rate not to exceed 7.5~. BACKGROUND: Because of recent declines in interest rates it has become feasible for the City to consider reducing costs by rePonding the original bonds sold for assessment district 85-PD. The attached resolution approves the sale of the refunding bonds and sets limits to the underwriter's discount and the inlerest rate paid on the bonds. This resolution also establishes a redemption which will make payments on the refunding bonds from collected assessments. As proposed this refunding has the potential of saving the City in excess of S2 million over the remaining life of the bond issue. For this reason, staff is recommending approval of the attached resolution and sale of the refunding bonds. Respectfully Submitted, ~ ,~C~ZA,,.'~-. .Yi 'V-t---~. Duane A, Baker Assistant to the City Manager DAB/dab 47 RES(7[.Ul'IQI N0. 93- ~O~ A RESOLVTICN OF THE CITY OOIR~CII. OF THE CP17 OF RAt~JJ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MAKING AWARD FOR SALE OF REFUNDING BDT~ AND PAOVIDING FOR THE FSTABLISHMENT OF A REDEt~'t'ICN PUND WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCZL of the CTiY OF RANCHO CDCAIIIxA, CALIFCNA7IA, did previously undertalre proceedugs and confian assessments in a special assessnent district pursuant to the tevas and provisions of the "LaMscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Hic~msys Cale of the State of California, said special assessment district known and desigrmted as ASSESSFIINT DISTRICT N0. 85-PD (hereinafter referred to as the "ASSeasner:t District^); and WHEREAS, v:prwa:ent bads represenrti7g the unpaid asseamnatts within said Assessment District were issued and sold in the nervier provided in the "Ltprwaient Bo:d Pct of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets arcl Highways Code of the State of California; and, WHEREAS, at this time, this legislative body has initiated proceedings to refund all outsr,+.rd+ ~ laQrVV91E'nrt bOnYi4 pursuant to the "Refunding Act of 1984 for 1915 DlQrvvanent Act Raids^, being Division 11.5 of the Stzeete aid Highysys Cods of the State of California, said refunding bonds aid district to be designated ae ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. OS-PD-R (REEVFIDING) (hereinafter referred to as the "Refunding District"); ani, WHEREAS, there has new been received, in proper fawn, a Boni Purchase Agrearent (hereinafter the "Purchase Agrea:ent'•) for the purchase of said refunding bonds to issue under said proceedings, which is considered to hest eesve the interests of owners of lard in:luded within tF:e Pefurdirg District and should be accepted. NCW, THEREFtlRE, the City Cour:cil of the CLty of Ranch Cucamonga dI.JE9 hereby rF+~olve as follows: SFX.'1'ZON 1. '!fiat the above rncitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. This legislative body hereby apprwea the sale of the refunding bonds by negotiation with the Underwriter, pursuant to the Purchase Agreanent by aM between the City and the Underwriter, in substan- tially the form on file with the City Clerk. The City Flanaget is hereby authorized and directed to exe~vte and deliver the Purchase Agzeansnt for and in the r~na and on behalf of the City with such additions, changes or corrections therein as the City Fianager mty, in his discretion, approve as being in the best interests of the City, such approval to be cronclusively ovidericed by the execution thereof. In connection with the execution aM der +~rery of the Purchase Agrea:ent, the City Manager is furtMr authorized and directed to negotiate the price and the interest rates foz the zefurrlirg fiords to he sold pursuant to such Purchase Agzea:ent such chat (i) the refunding 6orrds shall be sold to the Underwriter at a discount not exceeding /. S 0 and (ii) the interest rate shall not exceed the rate per annum of ~, .s" 8. SECTION 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized to accept the crnmitrent, if arty, to provide nunicipal bond ..-o and to pmvide nunicipal bond debt service reserve ford policy for the refurdirg bonds. The City 2•'.arrager is farther authorized to execute the crnmitment letter of arty such bond insi,ror aM to d7 any and all other things and to deliver any and alI documznts necessary arcl advisable in ozder rn obtain the municipal bond insurance and municipal bond debt service reserve ford policy, if arty, for the reftudirg horde. SECPICN 4. That said sale is subject to all the terms aM coMi- tions as set forth in the Said Indenture and in the Purchase Agreamnt. SECPION 5. Ttfet the Treasurer be, and hereby is, direcked to have the refurdLg horde printed immediately and said Treasurys shall then have said refunding bonds signed and delivered open receipt of the amunt of monies due p.,~..++t to said Purchase Agxean~t and open the performance of all the conditions es set forth in the Purctnae Igzeemant. SECI'ICN 6. That the Treasurer !e herelz3. authorized and ~+m-~~ to keep a redenptiar ford deal red which he shall place all sure r~eoaived fas' the mr~~r or~ees~sese- rrents end the interest thereon, together with nll perxltiea, if applic- able, thereon aM fran which he shall disburse such funds to the regis- tered owner. [hrder ro circunatarices shall the Bald bads or interest thereon be paid cut of any other ford except m provided by law. Said ford shall he khan as the !'flQi FCTID, and shell be designated by the name of this ldefurcivg District. SECTIQ9 7. That the Treeaurer shall transfer sorties ae recea- sar'Y iron the SPECIAi. AES©tVE IrIR.ID in the niaturer end form ae authorized by law. PASSED, APPIa7VED, and ADDPTED this day of , 1993. AYES: LADES: NBSENP: ATPF.ST; City Clerk Mayor ~7 -- ----- - CITY OF RANCHO CIiCAMONGA '~°.~ w._ STAFF REPORT - - . DATE: April 21, 1993 :~'~ 71D: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: lack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~ BY: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager S[7BJECI': APPROVAL OF LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL CLUB WH[CH PROVIDES FOR A TEMPORARY PARKING LOT FOR PATRONS OF THE QUAKES BASEBALL GAMES RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Letter Agreement between the City and Rancho Cucamonga Professional Baseball Club. BACKGROUND: The Quakes Baseball Club's first homestand of the 1993 season was very successful. The first four games, April 8,9,10,11, were played before sell out crowds. Because of the expectation of sell out crowds, additional off-site parking facilities were temporarily provided at the Civic Center and the Law and Justice Center, with patrons using team provided buses to get to and from the stadium. Based on information from the team, the next homestand is also expected to sell out, as well as many other games in the 1993 season. ANALYSIS: The tenant recognizes the need to provide additional parking spaces for patrons of the baseball events. The team has proposed that the site directly north of the stadium be used as a temporary parking lot for patrons of the baseball games. The team has discussed the use of the land with the property owner and there i3 agreement between the two parties for this to occur. The team proposes to clear the area to be used for parking and provide a gravel base and security lighting for the area. The area to be used for parking is identified on the attached Exhibit "A". The team has indicated that this temporary parking lot will be completed by the next baseball game on April 23, 1993. The Letter Agreement is being developed by the City Attorney's office and will be submitted to the City Council in advance of the meeting. This temporary lot is expected to meet the needs of patrons of sell out games for the 1993 season. Staff and the team are atso developing solutions to meeting the long term parking needs for the stadium, Once these are developed they will be presented to the City Council for submitted, Jack Lam, AICP - ' - -~_ City Manager attachment: Exhibit "A" 51 ~oa-E 1~ i t L z i ~ . a ~i S9b ~ - --........_. 4Q r I ~~ ~--- VNd~~ o- 'L 3 ~ Z 4 1 ~p ~/ ~~ ~ ~ ;~ ~ i °~ ~ u ~ ~. ~l V ~~1 ~I lX: 4 ~~ N ~` ...~~r -~ .... ~1g o~ 1~d~_.., VM~~~V1S __~ 52 ale C nC n t;ii t ur tu+iv~~riu ~uunm~rvun STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~> FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer SUBJECT: ANARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EKECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR MILLIKEN AVENUE BIKE ROUTE AND BASE LINE ROAD BIKE LANE PHASE 1, IMPROYEMENi PROJECT FOR THE AMOUNT OF 517,200.00 (f 15,637.00 PLUS lOS CONTINGENCY), TO BE FUNDED FROM ADMINISTRATIVE AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT GRANT FUND, ACCOUNT N0. 14-4158-6028 RECOMMENDATION: It is recomaended that the City Council accept alt bid proposals as received, award and authorize execution of contract for Milliken Avenue Bike Route and Base Line Road Btke Lane Phase 1, Improvement Protect to the lowest responsive bidder, Arrow Straight Marking and Striping Service for the amount of f15,637.00 and authorize the Adm1n15tratlve Services Director to expend (17,200.00 (f 15,637.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Administrative Air Quality Improvement Grant Fund, Account No. 14-4158-6029. BACKGROUND/ANN.TSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on Thursday, March 25, 1993, for Lhe subfect project. Arrow Straight Marking and Striping Service is the apparent lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of f15,637.00 (see attached bid Summary). The Engineer's estimate was (53,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and 1n accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background /nvestigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, /~~~~ N1111am J. o'N1r11 City Engineer NJO:LRBay Attachment cc: Purchasing Se $88$8 aQ am8-'~~ J Vi IV N (V ~O N N y N C N W n p p p p ~•C 0000 ~_.~ oopppp~~ PU QI~ N N Vf N N~9 w pp pp S gC6p O;Ob00 Sw• VJ V31 Q ~Yp ~ S~hpp W `NG_ t oy~ Vl NHy 6~ ~ ~~a ~8°8 O ~~• r ~c v~ v~rw Z;OpC ~ ~an dew e~b may .5'. $$88 ~e ~ ~~~~ =pC ~ o~n o~n V Z ^N N N N eye p{ 44~ Ew„ Y'p~ 'a 88888 p 0 ~" i~~Y a25SaS ~y~ °h°~R ~ 9 N N H Z~ ~. .~ r..~ r fzi~ ~ Y 3 .e ~~~~ F ~ a °y~ ^'. y a 54 - 1:1Z I yr 1LHiv,..nv ~~a, na.ava, von STAFF REPORT GATE: April 21, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council 9 Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager \~ FROM: N111tam J. O'Neil, City Engineer " BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer. SUBJECT: pNARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SEVENTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS, BETNEEN HAVEN AVENUE AND CENTER AVENUE, FOR THE AMOUNT OF 5152,500.00, TO C.P. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., FOR THE AMOUNT OF 5167,750.00 (5152,500.00 PLUS lOS CONTINGENCY), TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 9 GAS TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 09-4637-9223 AND FUND 83, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 82-1R, ACCOUNT NUMBER 83-4637- 6028. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Ctty Council accept all bid proposals as received, award and authorize execution of contract for Construction of Seventh Street Improvements between Haven Avenue and Center Avenue to the lowest responsive bidder, C.P. Construction Company, Inc., for the amount of 5152,500.00 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend 5167,750.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Fund 9 Gas Tax Account Number 09-4637-9223 and Fund 83, Assessment District 82-1R, Account No. 83-4637-6028. BACIt6R W IO/IINN.YSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on Apr11 1, 1993, for the sublett project. C.P. Construction Company, Inc., is the apparent lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of 5152,500.00 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was 5293,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and 1n accordance with the 61d requirements. Staff has completed the required background Investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted,/~~~Q~ , M1117am J. O'NT71 City Engineer NJO:LRB:Iy Attachment cc: Purchasing o~ H$HHp$p$y$yHC$$pHSH$$$HH$HHH$_oHHHH$HH ~~'. Nfm~l'N ~N ~`O HH$8H ~~'/NIHN~~N~p~ N~N~pp pQryry~~NH H _Q P90N `ONKNN :N~Nt~m.^ N ON('~IP ^O~~N j...iH Hrj~yNN~,~ ~ HmHHrtip.pN ~.:HH H H H H H H H H N H Y. H H m H H O H H H H :J ='e H°8H°_HH.ppHHHH$H$pHH888HHHH~3H8HH$8, f 1 ~VfK ~NM88HSS yCCy~~OpOp NNOHH.ap yN py yN y^SmmNNmH H H H N N O ~O N~ N ~V H H H H H H H H H N H H H H H N N H H H H W ~= ^ C O 'O O O O H Q O H O O H C O H vj O O H O O O O O H O H O O H J N h ' N O e ° O m ~0 0 0 5~ m M f 4 g ~Q 9Q g ry~~3 ~S o ~33~8m~g~~SgO=~=~~X v~gvc' ~a p ~' V ~ a S i_ ~ y yNNO~N ~H^HyjHHM1N OI~NNrHHHH p H H H N N HV H H H H H y p O H H fH N H H H H H Z v c d n c, C HR8 8H$88 88 ?RR~ 8 $8888H 8 8°8 8 8 8 8 8 O ~ ~ G8 8 y .p ~p py p.ypp 8 p y ~yp Qdp3 ~ H N~ H H N N M~ ~~O M1 O m H H H H H H H N H H~ H H H O-aO H ~y y~N.:~H1.jH H N N H H H y QCp u °a e s 8 8 °O ~ 8 8 8 $ 8 8 H 8 H 8 8 $ 8 8 $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 $ $ $ 8 O.H O m o S 8 py 88 p p p~p pN ~Q pq R pppq p.pp pQ pppp py ~Q pS gppp Op .p pN pp pf~ y~O S 8 pQ 8 8 8 8 8 POV'f (~~~ O^O 0~0~ 00~ ~Dy~I^ ~ ~T Y ~~ x O 47 ~ H H jyNO O ~Oy 9 O l N L i V H H ~ H H U 4 ~ f 9 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H r+C 4f0 v a9, 88 $9 .88 8 8 8 88 8 88 88$ 8 $8 8 $ 8 88 8$ F=~ _ , S , p pp C.p pp ~p p.p vpp~ S Q.y p~p 8 8 8 8 pQ~G, / ~ H ~ W H N H H N N y ~ (~ (..~ 1 y H N H 0 0 O H H H H H H H O r H H HHHNH HH 0: N E .~.~p.nN C~Nd~^~dN.^..NO~L V~V~H`mO Vt CO tP~1M dNNN ; Q ~OV `~A [Y 0 `` = fi C t f t~ i yFy c~ h '~ ` ~1{~,{t, a daaa µ,{y {~, µ,4,{~, J...I ..I~~~~ W ~ W W ~.yJW W ~y..7 .1a..1~J..1 .-1 J.41 J.LL]W ray m~ a QN _ ~~ ...(3pp3~ $ gg y~ u ~ q~ ` $$ 2 ~ JY G ~ `^ ~ ~ pp Z°, ~ e ;~ •'pn~ d NiV ~l~ UO ~~ O Q Q CI LI QQQ ~~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ b y . • ~ ~ '~ ,p ~ ~p22C Ry~5 S Q~S Q~ gg S $~ 333y5i; y°ti~~ 3a~~~ ~~iJE A < ~ ~ OO ~ y°5°a'~ '{$~ yS U V 3 ~~~ ~$? ~aa~~a0~'ca~'caaaa~zaQ # ` ~ 'ai y9 ~y Ye 2V U0: `~oCU< ~~yp ~y~p ~ K' ni.~ y~Cy.~, mmmmoo 3 ~i} U~C1 F-~0L OaoTN~nm~ln ~iN ~~'^--^ y . J ~ p pq 1041 yZ .~N e7+H~Oh qs aa yy~~ ~.pp Gypp WT®O~~nn.~i .Ni .Hi .~iN NS~I~NNNNNNH C ~ 9 ~^.,O.~J, 'J,00'J,S p00 h y NH N ~a ~888~g~R~~h d W K .~ y O K U <'c _ ~g?3~~d ~p~8gg b' rr N H H M1 H » ~ N N O QOO O.~J.00O0'.J,PO r ~ H~~~~HO gixO viC bQ .~.: ~MWK Vy'V'H mN ~N C (9 V1 ~ W O l9 V L U=, 8,gg8~88$$~~ '~R~ww~8~~~5+_0 ~{rnHw..,H H ~ H H 9: 88g88gggg88 ~~~y~y8~g~8~~ a ~~ H H H H y H M O _ SO 8H SH 8H 8O OyO 8O SH 8O 8O 8O O O O O N N a Napp O N O N NyHHH y)~HINIIN N.. .may.. .J ~~. ~..~ q .~ 8 .,y yW O ~ ~ ..7 Yg e U~? ~~~ A3y "~ ~aF ~~~ ~" s3~ ~.. ~ n ~d6~ HUv~i ~i ~ V ~~~~~~~ 57 ~° yy~~~O°mO,~g8 g.p8p.pp~p8p88Sg8888 Sg8 ppS gb, "b,gygy gv°i, 2yy3 ~v~°pp~9i~g~gpp8 OB '~j_CO~~~~O. `O aJJ ~<hmhV~~q~MOWi'N WNHHHH~ ~9 e' Nt7 ...a{ NaaNyyTVf ~~yyH~m NH J ~HHHHHVfHHHHK HHH H HHHHmH K ~C p pp p pp pp pp pp pp p pp pp pp ~J~J'' pp pp pp p pp pp pp pp oo pp OO pp pp pp p=._ OO.O.p~OSOVOV ~OOO~pp SSO OOOO0808O~,WN.~OOOyO pN ONNOOOO .~HHNHHH~OM N~/~ld r'rO~Fy "HHHyHy~HHHHi/f vbi N ~ N p N N N H N m .: H H H H H H H H y~ ~ C 8O .. Opp $ O O 8 O8 ~ O 88O S OS 8 O8 88O 8 O8 O O 8 O8 O 8 O8 QO O O O O O O O O O O O N8 O ~< OVCS ~tyyB ~NO~N~ppOON~~O..pp mHy N~~Nf~f (V ~(VP~H~m ~ H H H H H~ H H y H H H y H H H H H H H H H fi O Opp pOp Cp Gp C Gp O Cp Op CCpp G C Cp C G C C O p a 8 0 0 H 0 0 0 H O O H QH OQ Ho O H O H H M O O H H O H H H H H ti= $H~~~mM$$~pQ ASS4 ES~~'~vNih rvi vyi Fyn ~Cp~r9im r4i ~i8 HHH ~Np '1 -l~~yH HHH~HHHHHHHV H H H N H N N H H u p C`000Op 88a yJ~yJ~~O qqpOp Opp$~opOp ppOO ~OOO pOp Cyyj rOr pti yOyOOOyOy ~O~yyOOppOpppp Q$O 80.N FfyOb~000^`nOFrnrVl NdO~`~NdNmOO.r~O c e W ry 'rQ1 O. ~~yy vv~~ Y • e ~ N H H N N~ H N H H H y N~ N H N H H~ N F~ N H H y H O .` "$a gp$p8ggW8W9i pppgp,~ggpp8pg88g8ggr8~qpp~ry 0y8p y8 gg^g~8(y~ggp38p3 ~_ ~yN~NHHO~NOpyNy.~pyNy ~HNHNHHNHNHO ~y ~p pp pp Vf Vf xN Cp Cp Vy mm Gp H .Y. ~q ~pN3VfV_~dN.. .+vf .. K1 ~p N~ptiMbVt^mtndNNN ari (V NN ~j ttVV ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~55~~~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ `^ _ ~ CaCa y Yn pop0 d ~ V y y~ a a N N~ e~ U P~ VI~ y~ G q^G G C Q Q QQ Q m ~'QE'yaGGG~..eE6A~1~'YVG333s~~a~~,~333~$ ~~~~a ~~i~~ ~~~~~~: HCJU~VUVVGVVVVVV~ ~~~~;~~,yyyy~g~$dadaaaaaaaaaaa ~., $g8885$~8$8$8,88~ eo c`d~~M~8'38~88~g e M -NVNfM1 »~ f9 VfN NVfNNN _ N O fi g ppg 8 b~, pgp `O~O, ppg o8o pp~ p8p pgp 9~~. ~O'/~i~000V100N pqa _C, p~vt (nNN M~pOON N.. m~d' NpN N~f9NNNN ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0? 0 0 4 0 8 0 ro ~~~~~~~~~~~y~ ~+Q NH NHyJ1NH W_ [5 N T a gg8g888888g ~'e. ~~~8~~~~~~~ o. ..N NN... N.n~..N H H N~~ N N N N N O O O O Q, O O g O O O O O e $ St~~i~~~6~~~~SS e NN ~.an N Yi e. N N .CCm p p p p p p p p p (1/O1/~~~SQv~ROVpOpV~~OOVVOOo}}ppppOpppO~ a= NI~NNNnb~~py~~ O d~ VVVlll111 y 4P N w w°. N~rO~.-~r.~.. .. .~ A a 3 •e ~H,~c3~~~~~~~ 8 g ~~~ ~~ ~a~~~~~ yat-. aa 9.. r '~5 ~~~~k~~~ g 59 ~0 8g8g888gg888gg~~8gg8~888ggg8gg :e vv~~~~y~y~p~p~~~pp~g~.~~pp~p~p~~g~~M<~~~~~~a~ da HNHNNIHNHHHHH'9~WHHHNH~~NNNKHVf VfH ~ H N H (9 Nf m p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p ~j p p p ~^ p p p p ~•C _ OOOpO O.pOp oyO 8O ppO CS SO 8O 8O pOONCO OOOCpQpp0000000'J", :,;) ~ ~~pHHOHVIW O.Op mI~0 ~0p0 y~HNNKHHHMNNKHKHP H H NHHH HI9HN H ~~ O O O O O O S 8 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 8 O O O ~< ~~~~e~ep~p~.pp~~~~p~p~~~pp~~~~~~~~~~$~8~~~ K K K N N N H H H y H H H y H H H H N H~ y N y N H N N U „ de 8888888888888888888$88888888 Y= $Hy$~S ~$~~~$$p ~$y ~N yHHHHNHHHH~HH H H H 5g 8888$8$$8$88888$888888888888$ .fig ~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~a ~~s<g~sg~ xs~ n q~ rn~oe~ r^.. a^~o~ V1M^^O yNy~O rIN CIm~Vi HOOH^Ot~t N~ A H H N ^H N N H H H y N H H y H N H N H N e H H H N 3 N p r~0 SSH H~H~ppHHHHHHc3pp3a 8H8 SHHHHHHHOOHOHS VHOHHH ~ OHy~HNN~~~Or~~~~W y~Vpi ~.pp ~Np ~Np .CphNVNi y^~YfN t1 ~ r r N H H H H H H N H H H H H H H H H N H H N H H 9. ^';y(`(~N~TfV ^eN.n .n V1~,$N`fi NiTyV1 ar01Q~f CfeNNN e 'l'T(( fV '~ `..~~J~u~B~~n~1~~v~1u~l`~u~1u`1°Jv~`f°J`~`J~~~J.uS`~`~~`~"~`u~l 6~ ~ m ~ 3 m ~ °~j~p„~ p_ppp ~ Z° ~j l1 U yyj Sg~y ~dN~Ny,~ut~~~g{ QQ~Q~ Q~Qn. ~s~ L~ 33e~~4~~~$: ~ _ at'~'~~~~ h ~ ~~~v~ ~~~~ x 8888$8888888y ~° ~~~~~~g~~t~Hyo a 6 mr=--:Cm o QQ yyyyy-Vfy y m p p p p p p p p C p p y p 8O SO OpO O 8O 8O 8O O QO O O °i~ O. YiNONCNObaHy .1. .~.r-y~Ol~1 yyy yn+- y y N ~_~38$8888888888 ;~ ~~~~~~~~~~~g~ :! ° 6 NV\-NprO-vtN ym < y H y y y y y y y y ~ O :J a $ g g g g g g g g g 8 ~_. ~v~~~~y~~~~~~~ Y N Vfy y y- y y y y ~' ~ O O O O O O O O O 8 O O P t M Lfi y y y N y y H y y 3 z 8838$8$8$$8 is yyHyyH.-.yHyy H ~. N--~-.---.-- A 6 y~ O ,e °, "a`~~`..i`.i`~`..fya°3`J ~~ s ~~~ ~~ ~ ~aHH"~a iao~4'~- ~~ ?~ ~~~ .y ~ QN N y .y, ~ 61 tai tx yr xce~ivi,nv ,.~~;tuvivi~vrx STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager , FROM: N1111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: N1111e Valbuena, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: APP ROYAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATiON CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 13280, LOCATED NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD BETNEEN MILLIKEN AND ROCHESTER AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY PGI N0. 38 AND RELEASE OF PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FROM THE LUSK COMPANY. aECa~oIDATTaN It 1s recoAtaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement, securities and monumentatlon cash deposit, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to release the previously accepted agreement, securities and monuakntation cash deposit. AMALYSIS/BIICIC6R Wlb The new Developer, GPI No. 38, is submitting an agreement, securities and manumentation cash deposit to guarantee the construction of Lhe off-site street improvements in the following amounts: Monumentat/on: S 10,000,00 Faithful Perforswnce Bond: (528,420,00 Labor and Material Bond: 5264,21D,00 Copies of the agreement, securities and monumentatton cash deposit are available in the C1;y Clerk's Office. Respectfully submlttedr Nilliam J. O'Neil I~ City Engineer C NJO:NV:~h Attachments lu+ RESOLUTION N0. ~- p~'~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 13280 AND RELEASING THE PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONIINENTATION CASH DEPOSIT NHEREAS, Tratt No. 13280, located north of Base Line Road between Milliken and Rochester Avenues was approved by City Council on January 18, 1989; and NHEREAS, GPI No. 38 as new developer has offered the Improvement A9reeement submitted herewith for approval and excecutlon by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Securities. Said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentatlon Cash Deposit replaces Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentatlon Cash Deposit previously accepted. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same 15 approved and the Mayor 1s authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk 1s authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities and Monumentatlan Cash Deposit are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the Improvement Agreement, improvement Securities and Monumentatton Cash Deposit previously accepted at Lhe City are hereby released. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING D1VlSION ~' N rrEm: 1TTLE TRA CT /280 F ~~ u . CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 ' TD: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager _ FROM: Nilliam J. O'Neil, City Engineer 8Y: Steve M. Gilliiand, Public Norks Inspector I SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOIL TRACT 14121 LDCATED ON THE Sg1TfkE5T CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AYENUE, SUBMITTED BY J.P. RHOADES DEVELOPMENT RELOI~EMOATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subfect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BAC1csNOmo/Alw.rsis Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 14121 were approved by the Ctty Council on March 21, 1991, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f692,000 Labor and Material Bond: f346,000 The developer. J.P. Rhoades, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. The extension 1s being requested due to slow economic activity. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully su ted, Nilliam J. 0'N 1 City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy Attachments J. P RHOADES DEVELOPMENT 1801E parkcoun ware. sanw Ana cA 927oI.so9o P.O. Box 1973, Santa Ana. CA 92702.1973 (714) 9729944 FA.Y fT.4) 9730805 March 19, 1993 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT a DEPARTMENT Engineering Division Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attn: Steve M. Gilland Public Works Inspector Dear Steve, 2 i ,;; Per our conversation on March 16, 1993, attached is the information you requested indicated on your letter of March 24, 1993. Forgive me for not responding sooner, but I had just received this in the mail on Monday, March 15, 1993. The reason we axe requesting an extension ie that our project has been relatively sioW even though we have iaereased our marketing efforts. We are in the process of bidding out the next ib lots in tract 14121 which hopefully we will start in three months. After those are completed we have 14 units remaining, which we hope to complete within a year period. Please grant us an extension so we may build and complete these units and all improvements needed on this tract. If you have any concerns, please contact me at (714) 972-9944. Sincerely, Grego f~ G.O Cole Vice President of Operations GOC(jm Enclosure RESOLUTION N0. 9~,0$$ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT IXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14121 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 21, 1991, by J. P. Rhoades Developmont as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue; and NNEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subiect to the terms thereof, 1s to be done in conJunction with the development of said Tract 14121; and NNEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement AgreemerK Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvemw!nt Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. ~xi x yr nruvunv uu~nmvrvun STAFF REPORT GATE: Apr11 21, 1993 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: N1111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer BV: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 14486, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AKRON ROUTE BETNEEN ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CEDAR VILLAS RECU~E11lIATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACK9t0UID/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee Lhe construction of the public Improvements for Tract 14486 were approved by the City Council on April 2, 1992, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: ;4,400 Labor and Material Bond: ;2,200 The developer, Cedar Villas, 1s requesting approval of an 8-month extension on said Improvement agreement. The extension 1s necessary due to a new general contractor commencing work. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available 1n the City Clerk's 09fice. Respectfully su [tied, ~~1~ N1111am J. 0'Ne City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachments C 8 D A R V I L L A S L I N I T H D P A R T N 8 R S A I P 2451 NEST MAIN STREET ALAAMBRA, CA 91801 (818) 284-5522 FAR (818) 576-5937 March 23, 1993 Mr. Steve Gilliland City Of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 14486 Dear Sir: Due to the WALK OUT of the General Contractor, the completion of improvement has been delayed. Please kindly to extend the agreement for another Eight (8) Months. We can then complete the project during this time. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact me at (818)284-5522. Co~r~dQi~a~l`~lpy~, b Leslie Liu General Partner LL:jl ~1 ECC CONSTRUCTION, INC. ~-(~ (i8ti0 Canby Avenue suite 111 Reseda, California 91335 Telephone (818)343-0330 Fax (818)343-04'88 or 343-0489 March 23, 1993 Mr. Steve M. Gilliland Public Works Inspector THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Expiration of Z:nprovement Agreement for Tract No. 14486; 9874 Arrow Route Highway, Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mr. Gilliland: Please be advised that ECC Construction, Inc., will be entering into a contract to complete the improvements on the above referenced site. Please accept this letter as the written request of Cedar Villas for an extension of the Improvement Agreement with the City. As I explained to you on the telephone, the contract with the original general contractor was terminated and therefore the improvements have not been completed in a timely manner. We will be overseeing the required improvements for the remaining work, which includes the driveway approach, repairs to the sidewalk, street trees, etc. we would request a 9-month extension of time which will be more than adequate to complete the work. Also enclosed please find a form executed in triplicate and notarized and a fee in the amount of $251.00. Thank you for granting this extension. r trvly yours, Robert E. Selan RES:jd 70 RESOLUTION N0. 9.3' p~Q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSSON AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 14486 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on April 21, 1993, by Cedar Y111as as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located an the north side of Arrow Raute between Arohl6aid Avenue and Hermosa Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in con,iunctlon with the development of said Tract 14486; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which Ts identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 71 l: ['LY Or 1CAN UHV CUUAMVNGA STAFF REPORT " V'- DATE: April 21, 1993 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council & City Manager FROM William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E. HackeH, Associate Engineer SUDJECT: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SETTING TWO (Z) PUBLIC HEARINGS FOA MAY 19,1993 AND JUNE 16,1993 TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD-&5). Sfaff recommends that City Council adopt the attached resolutions setting two (2) public hearings for May 19, 1993 and June 16, ]993 and giving preliminary appmval of the Engineer's Report, declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation Improvement District (PD-8°). Park and Recreation Improvement District was created to provide Funds to fiance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park. Heritage Community Park is a 40 acre facility located on the southwest comer of Hillside Road and Beryl Street. Red Hill Community Park is 42 acres and is located on the southwest comer of Base Line Road and Vineyard Avenue. The District boundary includes all of the City of Ranrcho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of the Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria and Terra Vista Punned Communities. Pursuant [o the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, each year the City Council must adopt resolutions, giving preliminary approval of the Engineer's Report and declaring its intention to levy and collect assessments (or 1992/93 Fiscal Year. The assessment rate increased from §35.00 to $52.00 during the 1991/92 Fiscal Year, this rate will remain at 552.00 for the 1993/94 Fiscal Year. Assessments (or PD-85 will be levied according to the following schedule: Single Family Residential 552.0(1 Less than 1.50 acres 526.00 3.51 acres to 7.0(1 acres 5182.00 LOl acres l014.00 acres 5364.00 14.01 acres to 25.00 acres §728.00 21.01 acres and larger §7,300.00 IG Respectfully submit/teAd/,.// Wm. Jce O'Neil City Engineer Attachments: Resolutions Preliminary Engineer's Report RESOLUTION 9~i QgD A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD - 85), FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the Cily Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Descrrptrmr Pf Work &E.C.Il4S1L That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Park and Recreation District (PD - &5) for the Escal year 1993,94 for the maintenance and operation and debt service payment of Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park thereon dedicated for common park purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Distdct. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape maintenancz (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said district. Id7Ldt111L S>f Work, SECIl4ri2: The foregoing deuribed work is to be located within We roadway rights-of- way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Park and Distri[ts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Description gj Assessment RlSliltt5. BE~TIQIY3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said disMcts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Park and Improvement Distdct (PD - 85), indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within the assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. B=pi bt EoCilleeG SFSIIQiY4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district 74 bounAaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for Hk amount and extent of [he assessments and for the extent of Hie work. TI!`1E AN1? vya~R 4E HEAHmIG. SEQ114M~ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT TWO (2) PUBLIC HEARINGS ARE HEREBY SCHEDULED IN THE CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 91730. A. FIRST PUBLIC HEARING: WEDNESDAY, MAY 19,1993 AT 7:00 P.M. B. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 16, 1993 AT 7:00 P.M ANY AND ALL PERSONS MAY APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE FOR THE EXLSTING IMPROVEMENTS AND TfiE PROPOSED N~IPROVEMEM'S SHOULD NOT BE DONE OR CARRIED OUT' OR WHY ASSESSMENTS SHOULD NOT BE LEV[ED AND COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 PROTESTS MUST BE IN WRFFINC AND MUST CONTAIN A DESCRIPIION OF THE PROPER7Y IN WHICH EACH SIGNER THEREOF IS INTERESTED, SUFFICIENT TC iDENTTFY 7HE SAME, AND MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY CLERK OF SAID C17Y PRIOR TO THE T[ME SET FOR THE HEARING, AND NO OTHER PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED. IF THE SIGNER OF ANY PROTEST LS NOT SHOWN UPON THE LAST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLL SUCH PROTEST MUST CONTAIN OR BE ACCOMPANIED HY WRITTEN EVIDENCE THAT SUCH SIGNER LS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SO DESCRIBED. laudsidQiog alld Lightieg Att Qf 1471. SE~Q11[ ft: All Me work herein proposed shall be done arM carried Hvough in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of Califomia designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia. Publication pj Resolution pj IuteadQn, SEGIlQr1 Z Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and Ne City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the lnldnd V Tlaily J1ulleGe, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Califomia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. 75 RESOLUTION NO. G~3,,~,%/ resolve that A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PD - AS). WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby WHEREAS, pursuant ro the landscape and lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and fife with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in wridng for which assessments are ro be levied and collected ro pay the cosh of the maintenance and/or improvement of said Park and Recreation Improverramt Distdct (PD -fk5); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report N writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented ro this Council for considerafion; and WHEREAS, said Council as duly considered said report and each and every part thereof and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor ay part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect, NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: I. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained N said report be, and each of them are hereby prelimiwrily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described N said report, the boundaries of the subdivisiore of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District N proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidenlai expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall sUnd as the City Engineer's Annual Report far the fiscal year 1993/94 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga PD-85 Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved:.~2~~~~ William Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Report PI}-85 Fiscal Year 1993/94 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the 93/94 fiscal year is prepared pursuant b the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and N compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Parks and Recreafion Improvement District No. PD-85, thereafter referred to as "the District". This Disrict, using direct benefit assessments, has been created to provide funds to finance the cost of construcfion, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucannnga, FINDINGS Section 22573, Landscape and Lighting A<t of 1972, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes Me net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to Ne estimated benefib to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from Ne improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section $000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Cali(omia). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variatiore in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contlguous or rwmm~tlguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Arbde XIIIA. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline rightrof-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot aaeage DISTRICT ANALYSIS Improvement DisMct Boundary The improvement district includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria & Terra Vista Planned Communities, All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with $ectlon 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third $treeq $an Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD - R5. C. Facilities The existing works of improvement are generally described as follows: 1.The construction of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited b, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking Tots, lighting, reslrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, pirnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, joggmg and equestrian trails. 2.The construction of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, pirnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, underground storm drain system, and adjacent public street improvements. D. The assessment mle for the 92/93 FY is 552.BD, tNs rate will not increase foc the 93/94 FY. It is estimated that this assessment rate will cover the districts maintenance and operation expenses for the 93/94 FY. ESTIMATE OF WORK The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits carrying forward suryluses or rxovering deflciLS in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the dishict will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be irxiuded N the assessment for the following fiscal year. Proposed Maintenanre B~egr; 9;/yl Regular Payroll $230,060 Fringe Benefits $50520 Vehicle Maint../Operatons $24~p00 Maintenance & Operations $51,100 Equipment Maintenance S6 000 General Liability $13,&40 Contract Services $10,5100 Capital Expenditures Mandatory A.D.A. Study $16560 Water Utilities $103,080 Electric Utilities 51(10.950 Subtotal: $636,110 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $259,640 Tax Delinquency f42,440~ Debt Service fB44.9QQ Subtotal: 51,142,080 Gross Revenue Required: $1,778,190 less: 92/53 District Carryover <ftt Assessment Revenue Required; f1,662,620 MEDiOD OF SPREAD The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels with the DisMict in proportion to the estimated benefits received. A. B. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A -includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B • includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. CATEGORY C -includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels were discovered by searching the County Assessor's computer tapes for those parcels that are listed as exempt by the Assessor nr which have an assessed value of Tess than 55tq. In conducting the search, several parcels were included as exempt that show parcel sizes in excess of 1.5 acres and type codes vf, for example, residential or agriculture. These parcels were added back into the rolls and assessed. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size Range Number of Existing Res. Dwelling Unils/Parcel Less than 15 acres and tSl to 3S acres and 351 to 7.0 acres and 7.01 to 14.0 saes and 14.01 to 25.0 aces and 25.01 acres k larger and 1 or more dwelling units 2 or more dwelling units 4 or more dwelling units 8 or more dwelling units 15 or more dwelling units 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of edsNng residential units. The actual assessment for Bond Debt Service per existing residential dwelling unit may decrease each year as more residential units are built within the improvement district. Maintenance cosh, however, are expected m increase annually and will somewhat offset the antiapated decease in assessmenb due to new developmaH. Category B; All parcel not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties curendy tax exempt; 2. All public ownerships; 3. Railroad mainline rightsof-way; 4. Major utility hansmission ri~htsof-way; 5. Mineral rights; F. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than §500 and 1.5 acres or less; and C. Summary of Pmliminary Aasessrnent Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate which will be levied during fiscal year 1993/94 is 552.00 per dwelling unit fur Mose parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to 552.00 Nines the number of dwelling units, Cacegory B: The assessment which may be levied for parcels within Category H during fiscal year 1993/94 shall be according ro the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcel less flan 1S0 acres S 26.00 1S1 acres to 3S0 aces S 78.00 3S1 acres to 7.0 acres E 162.00 7.01 apes M 14.0 acres 5369.00 14.01 aces ro 25.0 acres S 728.00 25.01 acres & larger 51,300.00 Category C: The assessment shall be 50.00 for Category C parcels. PROJECTED 1993/94 ASSESSMEN75 23,217 Single Family Parcels 23,217 unity at 552.00 51,207,284 245 Multi-Family Parcels 4,749 units at 552.00 = 5246,948 Less than I.50 Acres ,935) Parcels 1098 units at f 26.00 = 528548 1S Acres to 350 Acres (409 Parcels) 401 units at S 78.00 = f 31,278 3S1 Acres ro 7.0 Acres (227 Parcels) 212 units at f182.00 S 38,584 7At Acres to 14.0 Acres (131 Parcels) 132 units at 5364.00 = S 98,098 14.01 Aaes ro 25.0 Acres (45 Parcels) 44 units at 57'18.00 = f32,032 25.01 Acres or larger (?3 Parceb) 1.1Y0113at 51,300.00 = f ZQ.ffiQ 29,876 units 51,662b22 .--, ~. E-» ~T~ ~~\ V 1 ~~ W W 0 ~--~ ~~ O ~~ E~ ~~ ~~ ~~ w r O ~~ ~ z ,¢ o U ~ ~ U C ~O;Z ~T. C O V C ~, 'Q ..7 C Z 4 {~ W U fs. W O z h ~ U ~~~I s ~ ~ , ~~i i Po 85 ANNENAi1 DN3 ANNENED ADRiI 1, 1992 iA 74486 75 AV ANNENED JDME 3, 1992 iR 14646 B AU ANNENED OCi08Eq 7, 1992 DR 89-04 .43 AC ANNE%EO OCi08EA 7, 1992 PN 129591 18.27 AC ANNENED OCi08ER 22, 1992 TR 14192 39 AU ANNENED NOVEMBER 18, 1992 PM 1372< 30.29 AC ANNENED DECEMBER Z, 1992 PM 13726 12.3 AC ANNENED JANUMY 20, 1993 L u. P. 90-78 4.08 AC AXNE%EO JAMIARI 20, 1993 TR 13759 56 Au ANNENED FEBRWgT 17, 1993 PM 14318 3.47 AC crrY VN fiANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda F.. Hackett, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR MAY 19, 1993 AND JUNE 16, 1993, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. t,2,3pSbJ, AND 8 r+F OA"M NDATION It is recommended that City council approve the preliminary Engineer's Reports and set Public Hearings for May 19,1993 and June 16, 1993, to levy the annual assessments and approve the Engineer's Reports for Street Lighting Maintenance District Nns. 1,2,3,45,6,7, and 8. Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, electricity charges are expected to decrease for all districts, due to a projttted rate decrease by Southern California Cdison of 3.1M. Even though the Edison rates are being reduced this budget year, the assessment rates are being increased to cover Ne actual costs of the disMcts. In prior years State Gas Tax Funds were used to subsidize the districts and artificially keep assessment rates low. By increasing We rates shown in each Preliminary Engineer's Report, the district will be able to stand on its own without additional funding from other sources. In some districts there is an increase in the number of street lights being maintained which also affects the assessment rate. Edison charges for ha(fic signals are also included in the applicable districts. In addition, Operatrons and Maintenance charges for traffic signals, which in prior years were paid by Stale Gas Taz funds, will also be borne by fhe applicable districts. N past years any available prior year carryover was used to keep assessments below the annual assessment revenue requirements. In some districts this carryover no longer exisb resulting in an increase in the assessment rate. The following, in conjunction with reference to the Preliminary Engineers Reports, identifies proposed FY 93/94 rates as compared with current FY 92(93 rates and justification for those proposed rates. The Preliminary Engineer's Reports identifies the required budget for each district and any carryover used to reduce rates. Strset Liy;htiug Maintenance District i`lo. J, _ Actecial An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from $13.81 to $17.77 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. This is primarily due to an increase in Electric Utilifies cost: previously borne by State Gas Taz funds. QJ Ch41 Ltghtine Maintenance 1?istlitt No.2. Ltxnl An assessmau increase is recommended in this district, from 52930 to 539.97 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Electricity costs increased over 580,000 to a projected annual cost of over 5200,000, this is due to the Fact that General Fund and State Gas Tax funds have subsidized the district in past years. StrePf yig~ng Maintenance I215t[ltt Jyp, ~ _ Victoria P~d[Inta1 Community An assessment increase is recommended in this district from 529.74 to 545.15 !or Fiscal Year 1993/94, This increase is due to a projected increase N elecMcity costs which were subsidized by State Gas Tax funds N past years and a lack of prior year carryovers. StleetLightinlt Maintenance D15t[ICt l`~n. q -Terra Vista Planned Commyn^ty An assessmen! increase is recommended in this district from 527.72 to 528.96 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Prior year carryover funds will still be used to keep the rate lower than the annual burden would require. lioweveq these carryover funds will not be available in furore yrs. Street Li6'httng Maintenance t2151[1Gt rjp,S_~gm pfannffi COmm yenity An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from 533.19 m f31.60 for Fiscal Year 1993(94. Prior year carryovers are used thfs year m keep the rate down but will be depleted and unavailable in the future. St[eeI Lightinft Maintenance RIStdCt i~ ~ c Commercial/Industrial An assessment increase is recommended in this district, from 531.21 to 551.40 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Prior year carryovers are not available [his year to keep the rate down. Sweet Lighting Maintenance J?~stlict lYo. Z=1Vnrth l:tiamnda An assessment increase is not recommended in this district the rate will remain at 533.32 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. This proposed rate is subsidized with carryover funds from prior year. +tll~ LI>:hting MaiQtenantP. YJiJLLl~ L`f0. fl: Snudl EhNidndd An assessment increase is recommetded in this district, from 512631 b 5193.75 for Fiscal Year 1993/94. This proposed rate is higher than the average lighting district due to a disproportionate number of skeet lights to assessment units. As more assessment units are annexed N the district it is exported that the street light-tn-assessment unit will be reduced thereby reduring the assessment rate. Respectfully submitted, W//~ eil City En r Wjdws Attachments: Resolution Engineer's Reporb RESOLUTION 9~' C 9~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHID! STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECITONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to he provisions of the landscaping and lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the $treeb and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: DffCUp1t4II 4J kYpIIL SECIIQI`I L That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to lery and collect assessments within Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 1993/94 for the maintenance and operation of arose street lights, traffic signals and facilities thereon dedicated for common purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districb. Said maintenance and operation includes the coat and supervision of street lighting maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) in connection with said disMCts. L9satlon OJ ~QIk. &E5~41Y 2: The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-of- way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more pardcularly described on maps which are nn file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Street Lighting Maintenance DisMcts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and B. i?escnptton-I Aa°^<-~.^<`~maM DJS1f1Cf9. secnOr! 3: That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said City Coundl hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said disMcts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thermf, and which diSMcts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within the exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3", "Map of Street Lighfing Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Sheet Lighting Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the tertitory included within each assessment district and which maps are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment districts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said assessment districts. OI SECTION 4: The City Council of said City by Resolution No. has approved the annual report of the City Engureer which report indicates the amount of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineei s Report" is on file N the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference to said report is hereby made for all particulars for fhe amount and extent of the assessmaNS and for the extent of the work ~E 0~ E1.ACE Q)_ HFARiNG. $ES.IIQls15; NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT TWO (2) PUBLIC HEARINGS ARE HEREBY SCHEDULED IN THE CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRNE, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORMA, 91730. A. FIRST PUBLIC HEARING: WEDNESDAY, MAY 19, 1993 AT 7:00 P.M. B. SECOND PUBLIC HEARING: WEDNESDAY, JUNE IG, 1993 AT 7:00 P.M. ANY AND ALL PERSONS MAY APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE FOR THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD NOT BE DONE OR CARRIED OUT OR WHY ASSESSMENTS SHOULD NOT BE LEV~D AND COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/99. PROTESTS MUST BE IN WRI7TNG AND MUST CONTAIN A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY IN WHICH EACH SIGNER THEREOF IS INTERESTED, SUFFICIENT TO IDENTIFY THE SAME, AND MUST BE DELNERED TO THE C17Y CLERK OF SAID CITY PRIOR TO THE TR.TE SET FOR THE HEARING, AND NO OTHER PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED. IP THE SIGNER OP ANY PROTEST IS NOT SHOWN UPON THE LAST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLL SUCH PROTEST MUST CONTAIN OR BE ACCOMPANIED BY WRITTEN EVIDENCE THAT SUCH SiCNER IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SO DESCRIBED. i andscaoino y~ ~~~ ~ ~~ SECIlQr! fi: All the work herein proposed shag be done and ranted through in pursuance of an act of Lhe legislature of tire State of California designated as the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Publication pj )j~pj{tijpppj Jam, SECII4IYZ Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 6961 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in the JBILBd Vie D2ity 1JIIlfP31/1. a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION NO. 93, O (~3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7AND 8. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve that: WHEREAS, pursuant to the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessments are ro be levied and collected ro pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvement of said S[reet Lighting Maintenance Distdct Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Act, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council as duly considered said report and each and every part thereo( and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor ay part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does herebyorder as follows: 1. That the Engineer's Esfimate of itemized costs and experees of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained N said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessment upon the subdivisions of land in said Assessment District in proportion to the estimated benefit ro be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenaee thereof, as contained N said repoc't is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fiscal year 1993/94 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings Q7 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No.1 (Arterial Streets) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: -d'd~ Willian 'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance Distrito No. I (AHerial Streets) The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). 1 Street Light Maintenance Dishict No. 1 (SLD 41) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial street throughout the City. The facilities within this district being located on arterial streets, have been determined to benefit the City as a whole on an equal basis and as such [hose costs associated with the maintenance and/or instalWdon of the facilities is assigned to this City-wide district. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals (or a portion titereof) on arterial streets. Typically, street lighq are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project Historically, the iretallation of street lights and traffic Signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of Ne budgeted costs for SLD Fl h for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and haffic signals. State Gas Tax funds have been used in the past for Maintenance and Operations. These funds are no longer available. Projected Maintenance and Operations costs are inueasing by nearly (49,000 Duet last fiscal year due primarily to the fact that Gas Tax can no longer subsidize the district A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the districe. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during PY 93/94 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected cosh to operare and mainain SLD Mt areas follows: Total Personnel E0.00 Maintenance and Operations E18,OOD.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjusttnent §5,470.00 General Liability f326000D Electric Utilities s7 5 6000 OperaBws and Capita Subtotal: 5211,990.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 5117,27.00 Taz Delinquency sy, q~ na Subtotal: §3fi3,fi60.IX1 Total Revenue Required: 5375,650.Op Add: Prior Year Fwd DeFicit f34 930,Op Asessmau Revenue Required: 5410,380.OD AnilY114/ The most significant impacts w the proposed FY 93/94 budget are the increase of Maintenance and Operations of nearly 549,000 due to the elimination of a prior years State Gas Tax subsidy, and an increase in the number of street lights and traffic signals. 124054 new assessment wits lave been annexed into tine district. For FY 93/94 Me rate per assessment unit Is 517.77. That is up S3.% from the FY 92/93 rate of 513.81. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the distrlcb Unit No, of Unit Rate/ Commercial Acre 3,338.84 517.77 2 S3S.54 E718,660.110 Single Family Parcel 16,426.00 517.77 1 517.77 5291.8911.0[1 Total 156 OS50.00 r;.~ ~~ .-~ w w E-- •.--, E-- w Iw r- .~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ BLD1 ANMENAIIONB AXNE%ED ADR IL i, 1992 iR 11298 15.72 AU ANNE%ED APR it 1, 1992 TR 14365 41 AU AMNE%ED APRIL i, 1992 TR 14486 35 AU ANNENED IUY b, 1992 iR 14<07 11< Au ANNENED MAY 6, 1992 TR 14407-1 11 AU ANNENED JUNE 3, 1992 iR 14644 8 AU AMNE%ED OCTOBER 7, 1992 DR 89-04 .41 AC AMNE%ED OCTOBER 7, 7992 PN 12959-1 18.27 AC ANNE NED OCTOBER 22, 7992 iR 14192 l9 AU ANNENED NOVEMBER 18, 1992 PM 13724 10.29 AC ANNENED DECEMAER 2, 1992 PN 13724 12.7 AC ANNENED JANUARY 20, 1991 C.u.P. 90-18 6.08 AC ANNENED JANUARY 20, 1993 LR 11759 56 AU ANNENED PEBRVARY 17, 7497 PM 14178 3.47 AC Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 2 (Local Streets) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: ~ William J. eil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) The F1' 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. Z (Local Streets) is prepared in compliance wiM the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (SLD #2) is used to fund the maintenance and/or instillation of street lights and traffic signals located on local street throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenanrn district. Generally this area encompasses the residentlal area of the City west of Haven Avenue. it has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street light on local street aM traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Typically, street light are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or a9 a City capibl improvement project. Hisrorically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #2 tr for electricity charges for the power ro the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of (201,670. In the past, Stale Gas Tax funds have beet used M subsidize the electricity charges in this district These (ands are no longer available and this is the mason for the (88,140 increase in electric utllitles over last fiscal year. A taz delinquenry amount is added ro arrive at the Revenue Required ro maintain the district. This is a projected arttount of delinquency tax payment which is antiapated m occur during Fl( 92/93 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected cost to operate and maintain SLD #2 are as fo0ows: $ppossd Manfenance 8 ~d¢ ~ for 199'+/aa Total Personnel §9,980.00 Maintenance and C+peratlore §5,OOO.tp Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment §9,870.00 General Liability §2,650.00 Electric Utilities 520t.6711.1p Operations and Capital Subtotal: §229,170.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $48,620.00 Tax Delinquency f21.23n.fM1 Subtotal: §69,850.00 Total Revenue Required: $299A20.00 [ess: FY 92%93 Carryover ( 549.270.001 Assessment Revenue Requved: §249.750.00 ANlysl4: The most significant impact on fhe proposed FY 93/94 budget is the increase in electridty costs of over $80,000 to a projected annual cost of over §200A00. in past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. N future years this will rrot be the case and as such will affect the disMct's assessment rate. FY 93N4 Assessment Rate: For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is 539.97. That is up 510.67 from the FY 92/93 rate of 529.30. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district Unit No. of Unit Rate/ lain Ilse Type Ursits Rate Faux All R Commercial Aae 224,G3 539.97 2 579.94 f17,960.00 Single Family Parcel 5799.00 539.97 1 f39.97 f23t.79000 Total 245 9.750.00 w ~7 6 2 y' o z ~~ 6 p p U d c..>OZ UpC Gs. 6 Z Q C W U Cs. 21 O Z 7-- C E~ V] U pt fi ~~~~~• ~iJdE ~ ~ sLOz ANNEMAil ONS ANNEMED ARRIL 1, 7992 iRACi 14486 3$ AU ANNExEO JUNE 3, 1992 TR 14644 8 AU ANNEXED ODLOBEP 22, 1992 TR 14192 39 AU ANNEMED JANUARY 20, 1993 iR 13759 56 Au Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved~i/~~~~~ .LCU William . 'Nell, Ciry Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) The FY 93/94 annual report For Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (SLD p3) is used to fund the rttaintenance and/or installation of street tights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses dre area of ttte 1"Ity east of Deer Creek Channel, south of Highland Avenue, north of Base line Road, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this distdct benefit the properties within this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street Bghb on Iorai streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on loyal streeb within the Victoria Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project Historically, the irutallation of street lighb and trafflt signals has not been funded with Street Light District fords, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD M3 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and haffic signals N the amount of over 5120,000. In the past, State Gas Tax funds have been used to subsidize the eletricity charges in this district These funds are no longer available and this is the reason for Ne (52,950 increase in electric utilities over the last fiscal year. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district 'This is a projected amount of delinquency fax paymenb which ie anticipated b occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected mats to operate and maintain SLD #3 are as follows: $gposed M ' tag BcdQet f 199~~94 Total Personnel SU.00 Maintenance and Operations SO,pp Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment 50,00 General Liability 51570.00 Electric Utilities 512'+61000 Operations and Capital Subtotal: 5175,180.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 533530.00 Tax Delinquency ~ Ip Subrotal: 5108,000.00 Total Revenue Required: 5184,620.00 Add: Deficit Recovery t2 290 (XI Assessment Revenue Required: 5186,910.00 The most significant impact on the proposed FY 43/94 budget is the increase in elecMcity costs of over 550,000 to a projected annual cost of over f 120,000. In past years the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or Stale Gas Tax funds, In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. No new assessment units have been annexed into the district. F1' 93/94 Asset/ nt R f For FY 93/94the rate per assessment unit is 547.15. That is up 517.41 from the FY 92/93 rate of 529.74. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the disMch Unit No: of Unit Rate/ Commercial Acre 9753 547.15 2 594.30 Single Family Parcel 3769.00 547.15 1 54715 Total c-~ Ly U E-- w W C ~ f--1 H~ ~~ ~~ t~ ~w .~ F-+ ~~ F--+ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~z ~ o v V C ~ Z ~C+ V Cs.. C7~ >^ 6 ~~ V p ~~~ ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: .~_ illiam J. ^, City ~~.i.v_r City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, Smte of Cali(omia (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (SLD M4) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and haffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Flaven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within this are: of'the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lighb on local streets and traffic signals (or a porton thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Typically, street light are installed by private development as a coMition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or a9 a City capital improvement project. Historically, the instalWfion of street lights and traffic sigraLv tas not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, thin is permitted under the landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The maprity of the budgeted costs for SLD N4 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly 550,006. A tax delinquency amount is added to arive at the Revenue Required to maintain the district. This is a projected artwunt of delinquenty tax paymend which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected cosh m operate and maintain SLD N4 areas follows: Total Personnel 544,360.00 Maintenance and Operations 510,000.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment 55,000.00 General Liability 5840.00 Capital Expenditures: Install Signal ®Terra Vista Pkwy & Church $t. $102,000.00 Electric Utilities 547.270.00 Operatons and Capital Subtotal: 5209,470.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 521,280.00 Tax Deivujuerrty 50 00 Subtotal: f21,280.00 Total Revenue Required: 5230,750.00 Less: FY 92/93 Carryover f f101.SIX1.001 Assessment Revenue Required: 5728.950.00 Analysis: There are no substantial increases in the district's budget. However, in past yearo the assessment rate had been subsidized by the General Fund or State Gas Tax funds. In future years this will not be the case and as such will affect ffie district's assessmart mte. f101,800 of the district's fund balance will go towards the installatlon of a traffic signal at the interoection of Terra Vista Parkway and Church Sheet 509.79 new assessment units have been annexed into the district. For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is 528.%. That is up 51.24 from the FY 92/93 rate of (27.72. Tire following itemizes the assessment rate for Ore districC Unit No. of Unit Rate/ lad lJse 7Woe Ilrri6 Rate FaAx AU. Revenue Commercial Aae 923.38 528.96 2 557.92 553,480.00 Single Family Parcel 2,626.00 528.96 1 528.96 57547000 Total 128 950.00 U .--~ w w .-.-, E___, ~~ ~~ ~---~ ~_"~ ~~ w r~ d z ~- ~z @~ 0 U U 4 O `^ o z ~ ~z w ~ m o ~ ~-- 4 e- v~ U ~~~ ~ ~~ ,~~~~ ~ a~ ~ ~ SLD4 ANNE%Aii DNS ANNE%ED APRIL 1, 1992 iRACi 14365 41 AU AVNE%ED APRIL 1, 1992 iRACi 11298 15.72 AU ANNE%EO MAV b, 1992 iR 14407 11f AU ANNE%EO MAY b, 1992 iR 14407-01 ll AU Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Anneal Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) The FY 93194 annual report for Sheet Light Maintenance Dishict No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the regmrements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Sueet Light Maintenance District No. 5 (SLD k5 is used to fund the maintenance amt/or instalation of sheet lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Milliken Avenue, souMt of Banyan Street, north of Highland Avenue, and west of Rochester Avenue. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within Htis area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streeq and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Caryn Planned Community. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or m a City capital improvement project. Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD k5 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in dte amount of over 527,000. Funds carried over from the 92/93 Final Year will allow the district to install missing street lights on Rochester Avenue and Banyan Sneet. A tax delinquency amount is added m arive at the Revenue Requved to maintain the district. This is a projected amount of delinquency tax payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 92/93 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected cosh to operate and maintain SLD k5 areas follows: 1'zepased Maintenance Budget [or 1993/94 Total Personnel $0.00 Maintenance and Operatore $12,780.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment $0.00 General Liability $480.00 Capital Expenditures: Street Light Installafion 524,2IX1,00 Electric Utilities 527330.f1f1 Operations and Capital Subtotal: $64,790.00 As>essment Administration and General Overhead $9,100.00 Delinquency Contingatry 5240.00 Subtotal: $9,340.00 Total Revenue Required: $74,130.00 Less: FY 92/Y3 Carryover f 533.610.0(11 Assessrnatt Revenue Requirtd: $40520.00 AIIil.y&14: There are no substantial increases in the district's budget. N past years the assessment rate had beat subsidized by the General Fund ar Sbre Cw Tax funds. In future years Mis will not be the case and as such will affect the district's assessment rate. $24,220 of the district's fund balance will be used ro install missing sheet lights on Rochester Avenue and Banyan Street. No new assessment uni6 have been annexed inro the district For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is $34.60. That is up $1.41 from Me FY 92/93 rate of $33.19. The following itemizes the assessment rare for Me district Unit No. of Unit Rate/ lad Use Tvoe LLtiN Rata Facbr AU R Single Family Parcel 1.1Z1,OQ $34.60 1 534.60 540520.00 Total 1,171.00 40 20.00 E--' w ~~ . -~ •---r ~.-~ C,~ E-+ w z ~ ~~ a 0 U V U O ~ ~ G D p°w~ c:., ~ 0 z a- e- cn ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~$ s ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 6 (Commercial /Industrial) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: O'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Coco m erci al/Ind ustrial) The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Cude, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (SLD #6) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and imlustrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance disMct. Generally this area encompasses the industrial of the City south of Foothill Boulevard. It has been determined that the facilities within this district bercefit this area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condifion of a development project's approval. Traffic Signals Can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the irutallafion of street lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light DisMct funds, however, this is permitted under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD #6 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over 516,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required to maintain the dlstrct. This is a projected amount of delinquency faz payments which is anticipated to occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual tax receipb. The projected cosb to operate and maintain SLD #G areas follows: Total Personnel 57,480.00 Maintenance and Opemtiore 52,500.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment 56580.00 General Liability 5310.00 Elxtrit Utilities 516.800.00 Maintenance & Opemdons Subtotal: $33,670.00 Assessment Administra0on and Cateml Overhead §5,370.00 Tax Delinquency 55.170 00 Subtotal: 510,540.00 Total Revenue Required: 544,210.00 Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit 5.4.180.00 Assessment Revenue Required: 547,390 00 A6ilyHla: There are no significant increases N the budget. In past yearn fhe assessment rate had beat subsidized by the General Ftmd or Sfate Gas Tax funds. N future years this will not be the case and as such will aflect the district's assessment rate. 7057 new assessment uNts have been annexed into the district. For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit is 551.40. That is up f20.19 from the FY 92/93 rate of 531.21. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the districb Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Acre 921.98 551.40 1 $51.40 547390.tN1 547 90.W E--~ U ~-.~ E--a ,.-.. w w -y r~ ~-~ ~-r ~-~~r~ ~--~~ ~---~ r~ ~~ w w z E-- d z '^ o E.. ~ z d p U V ~ Z 2Vdj L1 C~z7 U Cs., W O Z ~ CC/d'] U m ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ I s ~ sEOe ANNE%Ai 1CN0 ANNE%ED OCTOBER 7, 1992 OR 89-04 .43 AL ANNEREO OCTOBER 7, 1992 PM 12959-! 18.27 AC ANNE%EO NOVEMBER 18, 1992 PM 1384 30.29 AC ANNE%EO OELEMBER 2, 1992 PM 13724 12.3 AC ANNE%ED JANIMRY 20, 1997 C.U.P. 90-18 4.08 AL ANNE%EO fEeRUARY 17, 1993 PM 14318 1.47 AL Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: Ciry Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter I, Division 5 of Ne Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). B;<ik~nund: Sheet Light Maintenance District No. 7 (SLD R7) is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of sheet lights and traffic signals located on local streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has been determined that the facilities in this district benefit the properties within tlvs area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Typically, sheet lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development projects approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project. Historically, the instalWtion of skeet lights and traffic signals has not been funded with Street Light DisMct funds, however, this is permitted under the Lardscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costs for SLD N7 is for electricity charges for the power ro the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of over 511,000. A tax delinquency amount is added to arrive at the Revenue Required ro maintain the district This is a projected amount of delinquenty fax payments which is antlcipated ro occur during FY 93/94 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected cosh ro operate and maintain SLD M7 areas follows: Tobl Personnel 50.00 Maintenance and Operations 5200.00 Contras Services Traffic Signal Adjustment 50.00 General Liability 5170.00 Electric Utilities 51177000 Operations and Capital Subtotal: 512,190.00 Assessmart Administration and General Overhead f4b20.00 Tax DeRnquenry sd310.00 Subrobl: 58,930.00 Total Revenue Requited: f21,070.00 less: 92/93 District Carryover <s1.(140110> Assessmau Revenue Required: 520,030.OD 6N1XdI01 There are no sigi(icant increases in the budget. A fund balance carryover of 51,040.00 is available to keep the assessmart rate the same as last fiscal year. No new assessmatt unib have been annexed into the district tide year. ~' 93/96 A"_•es+ nt Rale• For FY 93/94 the rate per assessment unit b 53332. There is no increase N this assessrnalt race over the FY 92/93 rate The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No, of Unit Rate/ ladilse TYOe_ L» R~ Pxtr AU. Revenw Single Family Parcel (ipj,Qp 533.32 1 533.32 ,yZQ,Q'}Q,Qj1 Total 601,00 2S 0.030•W E-~ .--. w W ~ -~ ~~ ~+ r~ E~ ~---~ ~--~ y d z ~" o E- ~~ U C U V ~ ~ O 'ZG~ L1C, ~fY~C~s. ~~..] PG W U ~. M1l O Z Cam/] U ~I ~~ ~~ ~~~~ I Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Light District No. 8 (South. Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Repoli Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) The FY 93/94 annual report for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Artlck 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Candarape and Lighting Act of 1972). Ras4~mu^d• Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (SLD 88) is used to fund the naintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals lasted on local streeb in what tr termed the South Etiwanda area of the City. Generally tlus area encompasses the area of the City east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard, and south of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. It has beat determined that the fadlitles in this disMct benefit the properties within fNs area of th City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street Bghb on local streets and traffic signets (or a portion tltereof) on local streets wid~in the South Etlwanda area. Typically, street lights are installed by private development as a condition of a development project's approval. Traffic signals can be installed by development or as a City capital improvement project Historically, the installation of street lights and traffic signals has not been forded with Street Light District funds, however, this is permitted under Me landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. The majority of the budgeted costa for SLD f18 is for electricity charges for the power to the street lights and traffic signals in the amount of nearly f4,000. A tax delinquency araunt to added to artive at the Revenue Required b mammin the district This is a projected amount of delinquenry tax payments which is anticipated to occur during PY 93/94 based upon actual tax receipts. The projected cosh to operate and maintain SLD+tB are as follows: $ovosed Mi*temntt 6udQet (or 799'+x+ Total Personnel E0.00 Maintenarce and Operaliona f 130.00 Contract Services Traffic Signal Adjustment f0.00 General Liability ~rp,pp ElecMc Utilities ,53,p6p p0 Operations and Capital Subrotal: f4,pgp,gT Assessment Administratlon and General Overhead 5720.00 Tax Delinquenry 5g0,pp Subtotal: (760.00 Total Revenue Required: (4,830.00 Add: Prior Year Fund Deficit 52.17000 Assessmsu Revenue Required: f6,980.00 MilXd111 >n FY 91/92 there was only one parcel paying into SLD 48. )n Me FY 93/94, 35 additional parcels were added to the district making a total of 36. 3f of Mess parcels are owned by one company, the developer, Citation Homes, Inc. No new assessment unite have been annexed inm Me district Mis fiscal year. FY 99/94 Aaeeu t R h• For FY 93/94 Me rate per assessment unit is f93.75. That is up f67.M from the FY 92/93 rah of (126.31 . The following itemizes Me assessment rate for the distrkY: Unit No. of Unit Rate/ Parcel d6,0a f193.75 1 (193.75 f5.494.QQ 36.00 9&1.00 z >- o ~ ~~ d O U V U O Z X V~F~s~. p4C. ~ V W fs. W O 7- 6 E~ V7 U yC ~ ~~ ~a yr e rN ~ ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Lucinda E, Hackett, Associate Engineer SUDJECT: APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORTS AND SETTING TWO (2) PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR MAY 19, 1993 AND JUNE 16, 1993, TO LEVY THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS AND APPROVE THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, h, 7 AND B. It is recommended that City Council approve the Preliminary Engineer's Reports and set two (2) Public Hearings for May 19, 1993 and June 16, 1993, to levy the annual assessments and approve the Engineers Reports for landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. I, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Below is an itemized analysis on a district by district basis. To summarize, water charges are increasing for all districts due W a rate increase by Cucamonga County Water District of 5% for domestic and 7% for agricultural, effective July 1, 1993 and another 'utcrease of 5% for domestic and 5% for agricultural effective January 1, 1994. in some districts an increase N the amount of landscape area to maintain has caused an increase in the amount of maintenance and operation costs. In addition, some districts are accepting landscape areas into the district without annexing additional assessment units to off set the costs, N past years any available prior year carryover was used to keep assessment below the annual assessments revenue requirements, in some districts this carryover no longer exists resulting in an increase in the assessment rate. The following, along with reference to the Preliminary Engineer's Reports, identifies proposed FY 93/94 rates as compared with Current FY 92/93 rates. The Preliminary Engineer's Repurts identifies the required budget for each district and any carryover used to reduce rates. A tax delinquency amount is added to each district's budget to cover anticipated delinquencies in Gx payments. I( the delinquencies are less than expected, funds within the dishict can be added to the districts fund balance. However, if the delinquencies are as projected, various required maintenance activities will not have available funding which may result in reduced service levels. I and<caoe Mai to ante Di<ti ct No 1 - Cxneml Cis The recommended rate of $92,21 from $72,47 reflect increased water rates and inflation costs and the acceptance of Old Town Park, Church Street park and the Neighborhood Center into the District, 1G() The recommended rate of §422.00 from $405.30 reflects increased water rates of the district. LMD M2 has the largest landscape area of any district N the City with 118.62 acres, of which 27.50 acres is parks. i and tce M ' t anc Diatri t I~r 4a - Hy;~ The recommended rate of $413.74 from 5393.04 reflect the increase water rates of the district. 1 wnda.-tce Maintenanc D'ctri t N 4b 1'om 1 /I d 1 The recommended rate of 5352.80 from 5347.08 reflect increases in water rates ro the district. Landsraoe Main[enanre District No 4 • T rra Vic The recommended rate of 5252.50 from 3248.24 reflects increased water rates m the district. to addition, East Greenway Corridor and 1.00 acre of Bound cover ,turf and shrubs were accepted into the district to be rtaintained. 1 arvivace Maintenance District No r+- T t M The recommended rate of 5113.29 from 5108.78 elfecb wafer rate increase m the district. aJ ~was~e Maintenarre DiaMrf Nn !. - ('arm The recommended rate of 5246.97 from 5243.% reflect water rate increase m the district. aL_ndsc the Maintenance DiaMct Nn 7 - Nnrth FNU•anAa The recommended rate of 531gS6 from 5305.43 reflects water rate increase ro the district. 1 ~nderaoe Mainte an DiaM t r~r 8 - <n rth FN ~•- d The recommended rate of 5151.45 fmm 5150.45 reflects water rate increase to the district. Respectf ly Submitted~Q- City Fs°LT Attachments: Resolutions Engineers Reports RESOLUTION 93 ~ ~ / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COL'NCiL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND B, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ]993/94 PURSUANT TO 77-[E LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972; AND OFFERING A T1ME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to the provisions of the landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does resolve as follows: Descrlpnon !1f Wnrk. SEGTi4ll` 1; That the public interest and convenience require and it is the intention of this City Council to levy and collect assessments within Landscape Mainterance Districts Nos. 1, 2, SA, 3B, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 for the fiscal year 1993/94 for the mainterwrce and operation of those parkways, parks and facilities thereon dedicated for common greenbelt purposes by deed or recorded subdivision tract map within the boundaries of said Districts. Said maintenance and operation includes the cost and supervision of landscape maintenance (including repair, removal or replacement of alt or any part of any improvement providing for illumination of the subject area) vt connection with said disMcts. f.SlLdtl4Il!?f Work. SECIl4~IZ The foregoing described work is to be located within the roadway rights-oF- way and easements enumerated in the report of the City Engineer and more particularly described on maps which are on file in the City Clerk's Office, entitled "Assessment Diagrams Landscape Maintenance Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, F, 7 and 8. Descnotion Qj A=aescmeM TZIIIQCfi. $ES.~9-L`13; That the contemplated work, in the opinion of said City Council, is of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and Ne said City Council hereby makes the expense of the work chargeable upon the districts, which said disMcts, are assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof, and which districts are described as follows: All that certain territory of the City of Rancho Cucamonga included within [he exterior boundary lines shown upon that certain "Map of landscape Maintenance District No. 1", "Map of Landscape Mai.^:enance District No. 2", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3A", "Map of landscape Maintenance District No. 3B", "Map of landscape Maintenance District No. 4", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 6", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. 7", "Map of Landscape Maintenance District No. B", indicating by said boundary lines the extent of the territory included within each assessment district and which maps are nn file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more particular description of said assessment disMcts, and the said maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of said d55esament dlstrlCta. ® Pf ruliu+c*a. r !!l G CTIO '4 The City CouncB of said City by Resolution No.~has approved the annual report of the City Engineer which report indicates the anwunt of the proposed assessments, the district boundaries, assessment zones, and the method of assessment. The report title "Annual Engineer's Report" is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of said City. Reference ro said report is hereby made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the assessments and for the extent of the work. IIME AZ@ P1,A~& 4E ]~A8Q1Cu SF~$: NOTTCE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT TWO (2) PUBLIC HEARINGS ARE HEREBY SCHEDULED IN THE CNIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, C~OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 91730. 6fa A. FOZST~PUBLIC HEARING: WEDNESDAY, MA~f-M, 1993 AT 7:00 P.M. ((,,.~~L" B. SECONDRUBLIC HEARING: WEDNESDAY, JUNE 16, 1993 AT 7110 P.M ANY AND ALL PERSONS MAY APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE FOR THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AND THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD NOT BE DONE OR CARRIED OUT OR WHY ASSESSMENTS SHOULD NOT BE LEVIED AND COLLECTED FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 PROTESTS MUST BE IN WRFCING AND MUSF CONTAIN A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY IN WHICH EACH SIGNER THEREOF IS INTERESTED, SUFFTCfEM TO IDENTIFY THE SAME, AND MUST BE DELIVERED TD THE CITY CLERK OF SAID CITY PRIOR TO THE TIME SET FOR THE HEARING, AND NO OTHER PRfYFE$'IS OR OB~CTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED. IF THE SIGNER OF ANY PROTEST IS NOT SHOWN UPON THE LAST EQUALIZED ASSESSMENT ROLL SUCH PROTEST MUST CONTAIN OR BE ACCOMPANIED BY WRITTEN EVIDENCE THAT SUCH SIGNER IS THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY SO DESCRIBED. lawdscapiug and Irghtiog Act of 1471. $E~T14!`15: All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of Califomia designated as the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomfa. Publication Qj $eSQty(jpp Qj IBteutian. U $FS.ZZQ1`1Z Published notice shall be made pursuant ro Section i+~61 of the Government Code. The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest ro the same, and the City Clerk shall cause the same ro be published 10 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once N the I¢IHBd V Ile jly~y Bltllatiu, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, Califomia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia. RESOLCITION NO. ~~, ~ /S resolve that A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,CALIFORNIA, OF PREIJMRvARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGI.NEER'S ANNUAL REPORTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. I, 2, 3A, 36, 4, 5, b,i AND B. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby WHEREAS, pursuant N dre Landxape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City Engineer is required to make and file with the City Clerk of the City an annual report in writing for which assessmeds are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the maintenance and/or improvernent of said Landxape Maintenanrn Districts Nos. t, 2, 3A, 3B, 4, 5, b, 7 and 8; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed witlr the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for under and pursuant to said Art, which has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Coundl as duly considered said report and eadt and every part drereof and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient and that said report, nor ay part thereof, requires or should be modified in any respect. NOW THEREFORE, Ne City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby order as follows: t. That the Engineer's Estimate of itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in comrection therewith, contained N said report be, and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 2. That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment Districts are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 3. That the proposed assessments upon fhe subdivisions of land in said Assessment Dislricb in proportion m the estimated benefit ro be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. 4. That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's Annual Report for the fixal year 1993/94 for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings 130 Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: ~Si~le~'- William eil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Repoli Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Equestrian Trails) Piscai Yea[ 93/94 The F7 93/94 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City Parkways, Medians, Parks and Equestrian Trails) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and lighting Act of 1972). Backt,~r~nd.~ [andscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD p]) represents 29.94 aces of landscape area and 38.25 acres of parks which are located at various sites throughout the City. These sites are not considered to be associated with any one parfitular area wi8rin the City, but rather benefit the entlre City on a broader scale. As such, the parcels within this district do not represent a distinct district area as do the City's remaining LMD's. Typically parcels within this district have been annexed upon devebpment The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, entry monuments, equestrian trails and parks. The 38.25 aces of parks consist of Bear Gulch Park which is 5 acres , 20 acres of East and West Beryl Park, 5 acres of Old Town Park. 6.5 acres of Church Sheet Park and the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center which consists of 1.75 acres. Old Town Park, Church Street Park and the Neighborhood Center are being added to the dishict this fiscal year. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 92/93 93/94 Cround Cover and Shrubs 21.47 21.47 Turf 1.47 1.97 Parks 25.00 38.25 ~auestrian Trails j,,()Q ]~ Total Area in LMD Ml 54.94 Acres b8.19 Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas of the various landscape areas and the parks are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Application Crew . The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD qi are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs and the maintenance of the parks. These funcfiore, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails within the district. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD Al areas follows: Regular Payroll ¢15,060.00 Fringe Benefits $15,770.00 Maintenance and Operations 816,830.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations 516,310.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle Equipment Rental 51,000.00 Mileage 57,000.00 Conhact Services Parkway & Median landscape Maintenance 8236,400.00 Park Landscape Maintenance 5112,010.00 Tree Maintenanm 56,000.00 Athletic Light Maintenance 513,000.00 Capital Expenditures Mandatory A,D.A. Survey for 6 Parks 39,700.00 Touch Pad System for East & West Beryl Parks 536,OOf1.00 Capital Equipment Outlay 84,980.00 General Liability 57,480.00 Water Utilities 5182,170.00 Electric Utilities 549570.00 Subtotal: 5753,220.00 Assessment Administration and Cxneral Overhead 5113,660.00 Tax Delupuenry Total Revenue Required: $963,910.00 Less: 92/93 District Carryover <832,710.00> Assessment Revenue Required 93$ 1,200.W For 93/94 the district budgeted $9,700.00 for a Mandatory A.D.A.(American's with Disabilities A<t) Survey. This survey is required to evaluate design deficiencies in the districts parks for A.D.A compliance. Also budgeted is an 536,000 Touch Pad System which will allow the district to recover revenue from sports field light usage. Capital Equipment Outlay of 84,980.W is m purchase equipment for the Tree Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Applicafion Crew. AN1y410: Budgeted maintenance costs for LMD Ml increased from 5735,290 yr 92/93 to 5946,710 in 93/94. this increase can be attributed to increased maintenance costs, Mandatory A.D.A. Surveys and the addition of three City Park facilities to IMD M1. These parks will add an additional 13.25 acres of maintained area to the district. The increase in water rates is due m the fact that Cucamonga County Water District has implemented an average 9S% agricultural water rate increase for the fiscal year, while the average increase for the domestic rate is 7S%. the FY 93/94 assessment rate is 542.21, this is a §14.74 increase over FY 92/93 which was $72.47. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the districE Unit No. of Assess, Unit Ratel Single Family Parcel 8,034 $92.21 1.0 592.21 ;740,810 Multi-Family Parcel g,]j,Q 592.21 0.5 §46.11 $19< 37 QQ Totals $931,200 Q ,_ ~ E- ~ z Q ~ 0 ~ U 6 U O .'"~ z ~~~° 6 Z 6 CL' ~ U W ~ ~ O z ~- Q E-- cn U ~A `~ 3.7 j `1 ~ ~~$~ ~w~ ~ ~ ~ LMD i ANNEXATIDNS ANNEXED ARRIL 7, 1992 iR 14486 35 AV ANNE%ED JUNE 3, 1992 i0. 74644 8 AU ANNEMEO OcioEer 22, 1992 iR 7L792 39 AU ANNEXED JANUARI 20, 1993 TR 13759 56 AU Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: ~~~' G GE ' William Nell, Ciry Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) Fiscal Year 9a/91 The FY 93/94 annual report for [andscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (LMD #2) represents landscape sites throughout the Victoria Planned Community. These sites are associated with areas within Victoria and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed M those parcels within that community. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that planned community. The sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, equestrian trails and parks, The 27S acres of parks in Victoria consist of Kenyon Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park and Windrows Park The breakdown of mainlaiined areas is as follows: 91 /92 92lS't Gmunct Cover and ShruM 45.28 47.99 Turf 38.53 40.13 Parks 27.50 2750 Equestrian Trails x,00 .3.00 Total Area in LMD #2 11431 Acres 116.62 Acres The ground cover, shrubs and turf areas are maintained under conhact by a private landscape maintenance company while the equestrian trails are maintained by the City's Trails and Applicaton Crew and the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. The maprity of the budgeted costs for LMD #2 are for direct maintenance of mrf, gmund cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. the City's Trails and Application Crew maintains the equestrian trails and the City's Park Maintenance Crews maintain the parks within the district. the projected costs to operate and maintain LMD #2 areas follows: Regular Payroll $269,770.00 Part Time Salaries y 650 ~ Fringe Benefits $94,420.00 Maintenance and l7pera0ons b41~~ ~ Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $l0~pp0,00 Mileage $340.00 Ennergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental $1,000.00 Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenance $568,810.00 Capital Expenditures Mandatory AD.4 Survey $q~g00,00 Mandaory ADA Implementation 825,280.00 Various Renovatons ro All Four District Parks $60,520.00 Renovations to Etiwanda Trail $96,Op0,p0 Landscape Renovation ro Contract MainL. Areas $90,270.00 Capital Equipment OudaY $27550.00 Genera! Liability $12,330.00 Water Utilities $45570000 Electric Utilities 520.000.11(1 Subtotal: $1,782,340.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 5136,210.00 Taz Delinquenry $165,4RI1.t10 $301,690.00 Total Revenue Required: $2,084,030,00 Less: 92/93 District Grryover <5378 100 00> Assessment Revenue Required $1,708 930 00 for FY 93/94, the district budgeted $4,4C0 for a Mandatory A.D.A (American's with Uisabilifies Act) Survey. This survey is required to evaluate design deficiencies N the districts parks for A.D.A Compliance. Also Budgeted is $25,200 for Mandatory A.D.A Implementation ro Kenyon and Vintage Parks. Various renova0ons to the four Distr(rt parks for $60,520 include replacing the tot lot deck, replacing the concrete trail fence with PVC and repainting the steel fence at Windrows Park, construct retaining wall at Vintage Park, and repaint basketball courts at all four parks. Renovatiore ro Etiwanda Trail for $96,000 reconstructing curb and correcting the drainage problem on the trail. Landscape rnova0on for $90,270 include replacing trees, shrubs and ground cover at various median island and parkway sites. Capital Equipment Outlay of 527,550 is to purchase equipment for the Park Maintenance Crew, the Tree Maintenance Crew and the Trails and Application Crew. 7: In FY 92/93, the Assessment rate for LMD N2 was $40,5.30, this rate will increase ro $422.00 for the 93/94 FY. This increase is due to the fact that Cucamonga County Water District has implemented an average 9.5% agricultural water rate increase for the fiscal year, while the average i~xrease for the domestic rate is 7.5%. There were no new assessments units added ro the district this year. FY 93/94 Assessmen! Rat¢: The following itentius the assessment rate for the districk Unit No. of dl:se T it l iJ Unit Rate/ c ~a an vne n Single Family Parcel 3,7G4.00 $422.00 Fa[ro R en 1.0 5422.00 51,587,990 Multi•Family Parcel 124.00 5422.00 1.0 5422.00 552,330 Commercial Acre 15.74 5422.00 2.0 $844.00 513,280 Vacant Acre 49F.1)n S•122.00 0.25 St05.50 SSA zan T52T9L4 4,400.74 t 7S , 05,930 d Z ~"" O F ~ Z Q O ~ U Q V O ~ O ~ C V C OTC C V Cs] Gn, i]a O 7^ d F V] U G 18 ~~ i ~~~' ~~'~'` ubE ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 93!94 The FY 92/93 annual report for landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (Hyssop Maintenance District) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Sheets and Highways Code, State of California ([andscape and Lighting Act of 1972). ~4skBrwlndr Landscape Maintenance District No. 3a (I.MD 43a) represents a landscape parkway on Hyssop Drive south of Sixth Street. The sire is associated with an area within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed ro (hose parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for tlds district are charged to those parcels within that district. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 91L9Z 42[83 Gmund Cover and Shrubs 0.14 0.14 Turf l3.Q11 O.Itl Total Area in LMD M3a 0.14 Acres 0.14 Acres The ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained wrier contract by a private landscape maintenance company. The majority of the budgeted costs fcr CMD M3a are for direct maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These (unctions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs ro operate and maintain I.MD N3a areas follows: Regular Payroll $30,00 Fringe Benefits $]0.00 Maintenance and Operations $390,00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $0.00 Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenar~ce $1,830.00 Capital Expenditures Landscape Plant Ma[edal Renovatlons $600.W Moisture Sensor & Controller Enclosure Installations $5,040.00 General Liability $40,00 Water Utilities S87p,p0 Electric Utilites §]~(p Subtotal: $8,930.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $290,00 Tax Delinquency SQ.40 Gross Revenue Required: $9,220.00 Less: 92/93 DisMct Carryover _ <$5.910.IX1> Total Revenue Required: 10.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted 56110.00 landscape plant material renovatlon aM $5,040.00 for Moisture Sensor and conholler enclosure installations. No vehicle or equipment purchases are budgeted foc N93/94. ~ilY4l4: In the FY 92/93 the assessment rate for LMD II3a was b393.04/A.U. This will increase to $413.74 for the FY 93/94 to cover the current maintenance msfs of the district a~ the average 9S% agricultural and the average 7S% domestic water rate increases. This represents an increase of 5.27% over last fiscal year. No new assessments were annexed Into the disMCt this year. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the disMct Unit Rate/. I a.v1 Urn Tvce LM'fs R le Fachx U R Industrial Parcel 8 $41374 1.0 f413.74 $3 IO.W c~ r~ U w E-' F~/ w ca d ~ ,_ c E" ~ z -~ o 0 ~ U 4 coo^y z o ~~ 0 2 ~ d Er V] U ~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~3 aa~ 0 ~~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial /Industrial) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 3b (Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District) Fiscal Year 49/94 The FY 93%96 annual report for landscape Maintenance DisMet No. 36 (Commercial/Indushial Maintenance District) is prepared N compliance witlt the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Cade, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). landscape Maintenance DisMct No. 36 (LMD #36) represen5 landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Indushiai Maintenance District. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from the landscape installation can be directly attributed ro those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this distrct are charged to those parcels within that district. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows 42L43 SlLL4} Gmund Cover and Shrubs 5.95 6.79 Turf ,},jQ a.24 Total Area in LMD #36 914 Acres 10.(13 Aces The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Fi9jecied Curls: The mapdty of the budgeted cosh for LMD #36 are for direct maintenanrn of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with hee maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing ere performed Mrough a Conhact Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. A portion of the budgeted casts are for the maintenance for the median islands and parkways on Milliken Avenue located south of Jersey Blvd at the Grade Separation (or the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad. The projected costs ro operate and maintain LMD #36 are as follows: Regular Payroll St,940.00 Fringe Benefits $680,00 Maintenance and Operations $'7,700.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations 51,030.00 Emergency & Reg. Vehicle & Equipment Rental $1,000.00 Contract Services Landscape Maintenance $136,050.00 Tree Maintenance $26,500.00 Capital Expenditures Irrigation Upgrades to Central Control 558,500.00 Landscape Plant Material Renovations 512,000.00 Milliken Ave. Landscape Rehabilitation 5155,680.00 Capital Equipment Ou0ay /Vehicle 520,000.00 General Liability 52540.00 Water Utilities $42,830.00 Electric Utilites 59.920.IX1 Subtotal: 5476,370.00 Assessment Administmdon and General Overhead 529,180.00 Tax Delinquency Q,QQ Subtotal: 584,790.00 Gross Revenue Required: 5561,160.00 Less: 92/93 District Carryover _ <5149.270.(p> Tofal Revenue Required: 1~4 ~ .00 AIId1y414; U the FY 92 /93 the assessment race for I.MD tf36 was 5347.08/A,U.,this will utcrease to 5352.80 for the fY 93/94. This increase is due to the tact that Cucamonga County Water District has implemented an average 9.5% agricultural water rate increase (or the fiscal year, while the average increase fur the domestic race is 7.5%. 4958 assessment unib have beat added to the district this year. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the districC Unit No. of Assess. Unit Rate/ land lJe Tvoe Lb.ac Rbt Fxmr AU R n Industrial/Comm. Acre 1167.48 5352.80 1.0 5352.80 5411.839 Totals Sgp,g90 c~ E-~ ~--~ L w ~~ -~-~ Z ~~ ~~ '~ w z d ~~ z ~, oz ~_ V U U C 7 O O O O6G ~ U Lz. C-1 O >- 6 H VJ U t~ ~ ~ ~ ~i iNO 3R AMNE1V1iI0NS ANNEXED OCi08ER 7, 1992 DR 89-N. .43 AC ANNE%ED OCi08ER 7, 1992 9M 12939-1 18.27 AC ANNE%ED NO9EMeEp 18, 199$ RM 13T24 30.29 AC ANNENED DECEMBEp 2, 1992 9M 1]726 12.3 AC ANNENED JANUARi 20, 1993 G.V.P. 90-18 4.08 A[ ANNENED FESgVARY 17, 1993 FN 14318 3.47 AC Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approvedii~~~~*~ . William J. eil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Flscat, Y~9y/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). 6aclr~_nd Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (LMD %4) represents landscape sites throughout the Terta Vista PWnned Community. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from trre landscape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that dishier. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Terta Vista that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos and parks. there were 15.42 acres of maintained area added to the district this year, the breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 92lYd ZtL44 Ground Cover and Shrubs 7.27 6.35 Turf 6.62 6.58 Parks 1Zpp 27.OQ Total Area in LMD N4 40.89 Acres 41A9 Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that makeup the parkways, median islands and paseos are mainained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, the parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. The majority of the budgeted msts for LMD M4 are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrigatlon system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. A portion of the budgeted costs are for the maintenance for East Greenway Corridor, which is starts on the east side of Milliken Avenue, just north of Milliken Park and runs easterly ro Terra Vista Parkway Fist. This maintenance area will be added to the dFnict this fiscal year. The projected costs ro operate and maintain LMD;t4 areas follows Regular Payroll $260,090.00 Part Time Salaries $q,65p,00 Fringe Benefits $91,030.00 Maintenance and Operations $41,050.00 Mileage gp60,00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operatior~s 830,000,00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental $1,000.00 Contract Services Landscape Maintenance 5141,310.00 Tree Maintenance $2,p00,0p Capital Expenditures Repaint Basketball Courts 4i Dishict Parks $4,320.00 Exercise Stafion Replacements $17,280.00 Terra Vista /Base Line Median Renova0on $413,780.00 Milliken Park Expansion: Expand Ex. Parking Lot g96,p00,p0 Expand Ex. Ballfield & Add Sports Lights $120,000.00 Mandatory A.D.A Study for District Parks $14,600.00 Capital Outlay /Equipment $22,750.00 General Liability E5,090.00 Water Utilities $130,930.00 Electric Utilifies ~,]~,~ Subtotal: $1,469,290.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $89,140.00 Tax Delinquency ~0 Gross Revenue Required: $IS58,430.00 Less: 92/93 District Carryover _ <$524.69000> Total Revenue Required: $1,033,740.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted $14,6110 for a Mandatory A.D.A. (American's with Disabilities Act) Survey. This survey is required to evaluate design deficienries in the district's parks (or A.DA. compliance. Also budgeted for the district's parks is $4,320 to repaint basketball courts and $17,280 for exercise smfion replacements at Coyote Canyon and Spruce Parks. The Milliken Park Expareion includes expanding the existing parking lot lu add 75 parking stalls for $96,000 and expanding the existing 60' ball field to a 90' field and installing sports field lighting and a Touch Pad System for $]20,000. There is $413,760 budgeted for the Terta Vista Parkway/ Base Line Road Median Renovation and $22,750 budgeted for the purchase of equipment for the Park Maintenance Crew, the Tree Maintenance Crew and dte Trails and Application Crew. A.BSlypjs; In the FY 92/93 the assessment rate for LtdD k4 was 248.24/A.U., this will increase to $252.50/A.U. for the FY 93/94. This increase is due to the fact that Cucamonga County Water Distric has implemented an average 9.5% agricultural water rate increase for the fiscal year, while the average increase for the domestic rate is 7.5%. 357 new assessments units were annexed to the district this year. Attached is the Assessment Rate Computation Chart. 'Rre following itemizes the assessment rate for the districC Unit No. of Rate/ Single Fatuity Parcel 1934.00 525250 5488,300 Multi Parcel 2215.00 5222.00 5491,73(1 Commercial Acre 137.21 5362.99 552,550 Vacant Acre 30.14 537.12 51,12Q ~~ 1S ,033,740 8a ~ ~ ~o 9^~ ~ A ~ 4 >' > 8 n ri _ E ^ d E U U 8 ~n T ~' ^ E ~ 4 7 E L ° 'na { ~ ~ ~ S Y . a 6 g _ E ~ 4 ~ ~ u EY E Y• vaa ^ v ~ j Y C ~~ Y 2 tl ~ £ v y c 5 ~~ 9 ` C ~ 0 0 S m `vy e N rv E 0 V 8 8 T N vi E rv rv li $8 ~~ 4 N ~5'^ F 4 n ~ O ")C V 4 p~ ~gg & C ~~ 9 y 3 3 '" ~ 9 A ~ ~ q ~ de 3e ry ~ ~ a V ~ ~ E ' g' f4 F ,~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ ti ti ~ e ~~ E V h E .g ~' x T n w ~~ n 888 O n~~ ~ U `~~ ~ C ^ Q $ p tll 2 V 4( V 4 L G V~ G ¢@@@ ~ g F .5 .5 i ~ 29 .6 .5 9 A y ~ R 5 Y E fi V T E y~ 4 f ?. N E ~ W m 5 ~r U ~--. E-~ ~--. W F--~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 4r ~~ y d z >- o F-' ~ z 6 ~ O ~ U Q c-'Oz z z ~ ~ OG CY-. U W ~ O Z r 6 F C!] U ~~~^ ~~~ _ ~ Lro4 ANNENAi IONS ANNE%EC A9RLL 7, 1992 LAA[T 14365 41 AU ANMEXEO ANRIL 1, 1992 iRACi 13299 15.72 AU ANNENED MAY 6, 1992 TR 1440] 114 AU ANNE%ED 1UY 6, 1992 iR 14407-1 13 AU Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: / ,lt. Wuliam Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Maintenance District) Fisnl Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Tot Lot Mainterumce District) is prepared N compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of Cali(omia (Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972). Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (LMD KS) represent a landscaped Tot Lnt ,located on the southwest comer of Andover Place and Bedford Drive. This site is assodaled with a group of 44 single family parcels which all have a comrtwn usage of the Tot Lot such that any benefit derived fmm the landscaping can be directly attributed m those particular parcels. Because of this, assessment required (or this district are charged to those specific parcels. There is only one site maintained by the district. It consist of a Tot Lot and a sma0 amount of shrubs beds and ground rover. Ttte quantrtres of rtaintuted areas mnsist of: YL 'L13 SfLL3! Gmund Cover and Shrubs 0.33 0.33 Total Area in LMD MS 0.33 Acres 033 Acres The ground cover and stvubs areas are maintained order contract by a private landscape maintenance company. The rtajority of the budgeted cost for LMD MS are for dvect maintenance of ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and certain irrlgatlon system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has wi0t a private landscape maintenance company. The projected cost hr operate and maintin LMD NS are as follows: Pmrg~,t Mam~Byeet fn 1993/94 Regular Payroll fgp,00 Fringe Benefits X0,00 Maintenance and Operations $500,00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations 570.00 Contract Services landscape Maintenance $1,060.00 Capital Expenditures Mandatory A.D.A Survey for Tot Lot $1,100.00 Irrigation Upgrades to Replace Risers w/Pop Ups $1,200.00 Landscape Material Renovation $600,00 Irrigation Upgrades ro Central Control $5,420.00 General Liability f3p,p0 Water Utilities $280.00 Electric Utilities ~~ Subtotal: $10,500.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead $610.00 Delinquency Contingenry SSI.~ Gross Revenue Required: $11,110.002 Less: 92/93 District Carryover _ <$6.130.00> Total Revenue Required: £4,9~p,o0 For 93/94 the district budgeted 51,100.00 for a Mardarory A.D.A (American's with Disabilities Act) Survey. This Survey is required ro evaluate design deficiencies in the tot tot for A.D.A compliance. Also budgeted is $1,200 for irtigafion upgrades M replace risers w pop up heads, 5600 for landscape material renovation and 55,420 for Central Control irtigaGOn upgrades, A¢ilY%1%: to the FY 92/93 the assessment race for LMD %5 was f108.78/A.U.,this will increase to 5113.29 for the FY 93/94 ro cover the average 9SY agricultural and the 7.5% domestic rote increase N water rates from the Cucamonga County Water District No new assessment unib were annexed into the district this year. The following itemizes the assessment rate for the district: Unit No, of Rate/ Tvne Ilnih Rat Fxmr I Parcel 44 5113.29 1.0 f113.29 c_., E--+ ~n «--, w ti~ ~-~ r~ di w a.. ~ ,_ o E' ~~ 6 p O U V p 2 V ~ 6 Z d OCW V Cs. W o z F cn U r ~# Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: ~ William eil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's RepoN Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) F'~cal Ye r 91/94 The FY 93/94 annual report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6 (Caryn Planned Community) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landxape and Lighting Act of 1972). Rx4 Iandswpe Maintenance District No. 6 (LMD k(i) represents Iandxape sites throughout the Caryn Planned Community. These sites are associated with azeas within tltat district and as such any benefit derived from the landxape installation can be directly attributed to those parcels within that district. 1)ecause of this, assessments required for this distrkt are charged to those parcels within that district. The various landscape sites in Caryn that are maintained by the disMct consist of parkways, median islands, and paseos and . The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 4ZLS3 SiL.24 Cmund Cover and Shrubs 12.09 12.09 Turf 2.89 2.89 Community Tmils 3.ffi y(p Total Area in LMD #6 17A9 Acres 17.89 Acres The turf, ground cover and shrubs areas that makeup the parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained render contract by a private landxape maintenance rompany, while the Community Trails are maintained by Itte City's Park Maintenance Crew. The majority of the budgeted costs for LMD kb are for direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with Mee maintenance and certain irrigation system repair and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landxape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD N6 are as follows: Regular Payroll Fringe Benefits Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Maintenance and Operatiore Contract Services Landscape Maintenance Tree Maintenance Capital Expenditures Irrigation Upgrades to Central Control Landscape Plant Material AenovaROn Capital Outlay /Equipment General Liability Water Utilities Electric Utilites Subtotal: Assessment Administration and General Overhzad Tax Delinquency Subtotal: Gross Revenue Required: less: 92/93 District Carryover Total Revenue Required: $7,7900.00 $2,730.00 $5,5100.00 $1,910.00 $165,250.00 §5,000.00 $154,680.00 $13,500.00 $1,500.00 $2,730.00 $65,100.00 $428,750.00 ;26,870.00 ;41,900.00 ;470,650.00 < <_181.6911.00> ;288.96(1.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted ;154,680 for irNgation upgrades to Central Control and f13,500 for landscape plant material n3wvation. The funds for this rergvation come hom the carryover of last fiscal year's district budget. Equipment purchases of ;1,500 are budgeted for in 93/94. Ao4LYtl4: In the FY 92/93 the assessment rate (or LMD M6 was f243.96/A.U., this will increase to $246.97/A.U. for the FY 93/94 to cover the 9S% agricultural and the 759e domestic water race increases from C.C.W.D. to the disMct. No new assessments units were annexed into the dishict this year. The following itendus the assessmrnt rate (or the district Unit No. of Rate/. f arvl Use ~fpe Urals Race Facdx AU. Revenue Single Family Parcel 1,170.00 ;246.97 1.0 f246.97 288960.00 C~ E~ ~~ r-~--t ~~ ~~ ~t w ~~ 7 ""t 1~ ~~ .~ w ~-r '~ ~~ ^~^~ F~ t~ cfl E-~ w 7 ~~ ~~ w""'~ Qi w U d Q z ~"' oz ~~ U ~j U C ~ X U ~'~ C ~ Q CL~wU O n7 ?- C F V] U 6 ~~ ! ~ @ ~~~ s ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's RepoN Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (Etiwanda North) Fianl Year 93/94 The FY 93/94 annual repoR for Landscape Maintenance District No.7 (Etiwanda North) is prepared in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and Highways Code, Stale of California (landscape ar~d Lighting Act of 1972). Back~nuod: ' landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (LMD t7) represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North area. These sites are associated with areas within that district and as such any benefit derived from fhe landscape installation can be dirMly attributed to those parcels within that district. Because of this, assessments required for this district are charged to those parcels within that distnct. The various landscape sites in the Etiwanda North area that are maintained by the disMct consist of parkways, median islands, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: 92Lgi $tL'~f Gmund Cover and Shmbs 7.46 7S4 Turf 3S5 4.02 Community Trails 2.011 yQQ Total Area in LMD M7 13.01 Acres 1356 Aces The turf, ground mver and shrubs areas that make up Me parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contrail by a private landscape mafntenance mmpmty, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. Pmieeed CQ~, The majority of the budgeted msts for LMD N7 are far direct maintenance of turf, ground cover and shrubs. These functions, along with tree maintenance and eertain inigatlon system repair and testing aze performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape maintenance company. The projected costs to operate and maintain LMD M7 are as follows: Regular Payroll $2,590.00 Fringe Benefits $910.00 Maintenance and Operations $10,690.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations $1,330.00 Emergency & Routine Vehicle & Equipment Rental $500.00 Contract Services Landscape and Tree Maintenanre $137,490.110 Capital Expenditures Landscape Plant Material Renovations $30,000.00 Weed Abasement for N.E. Community Park Site $6,000.00 Capital Outlay /Equipment 5160.00 General Liability $1,930.00 Water Utilities 517,470.00 Electric Utilities 3740,00 Subtotal: $209,810.00 Assessment Administration and General Ovefiead $24,680.00 Tax Delinquerr<y 545.1G9.QQ Subtotal: $69,840.00 Gross Revenue Required: 5279,650.00 Add: Frior Year Fund Drrficit 523.410.00 Total Revenue Required: $303,060.00 For 93/94 the district budgeted $30,000 for landscape plant material renova0on and $6,000 for weed abatement at the Northeast Community Park site. There is 5160 for equipment purchases budgeted for N 93/94. The tax delinquency in an amount of $45,080.00, represents the amount of unpaid taxes within the district. In the FY 92/93 fhe assessment rate for [MD th was $305.43/A.U.,lfits will increase to $307.0.5 (or the Fl' 93/94 to cover the 9S% agricultural and the 7S% domestic rate increases in water rotes from Cucamonga County Water District. The following itemizes We assessment rate for the district Unit No. of Rate/. lard Use Twe lJrtits Rase Fveu AU. Revenue Single Family Parcel 987.00 $307.05 1.0 $307.05 $3(13060.00 E--~ U E-~ w F~ E-" ^~~ 1--~--~ ~~ ~~ ~~ d ~~ ~ E- U ~ U C..~ O X O ZGY-. U 0.' .... tX W U C~ W O Z F Vim] U C ~ ~ ~~ ~ a# ~ ~ Annual Engineers Report City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Fiscal Year 1993/94 Approved: William;l~'Neil, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga Annual Engineer's Report Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda Area) The Fl' 93/94 annual report for Landscape Mainlerance District No.B (South Etiwanda Area) is prepared in compliance with the mquvemanb of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 5 of the Streets and highways Code, State of California ([andsppe and Lighting Act of 1972). Landscape Maintenance DisMct No. 8 (LMD If8) represent Wdscape sites throughout the South Etiwanda area. These sites are associated with areas withbr that dlslriM and as such any benefit derived from the landscape i,vstallatlon can be directly attributed ro those parceb within that district. Because of this, assessment required (or this district are charged ro ttwae parcels within flat disMct. The various landscape sites in the South Etiwanda area that are maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, Community Trails and paseos. The breakdown of maintained areas is a9 follows: Gmund Cover and Shrubs Turf Community Trails Tool Ares in LMD N8 42L87 87144 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.06 ILOQ O.OB 029 Aaes 019 Aces The turf, ground cover and shrubs afros that make up the parkways, are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company, while the Community Trails are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crew. The majority of the budgeted msb for LMD k8 are for direct maintenance of Nrf, gmund cover and shrubs. These functioro, along with tree maintenance and certain ircigatlon system repay and testing are performed through a Contract Services Agreement the City has with a private landscape mainterance company. The projected cost b operate and mainain LMD r8 are as follows: Regulaz Payroll $40,pp Fringe Benefits (10.00 Maintenance and Operatons (890.00 Vehicle Maintenance and Operations §370.00 Contingency Tzee RepUcement (0.00 Contract Services fgg5p,pp Capital Expenditures Plant Material Renovation $1,200.00 Irrigatron Upgrades ro Central Control $4,700.00 Capital Chrtlay /Equipment ((160.00 General Liability $140.00 Watee Utilities 5770.00 Electric Utlities ~ Subtotal: (18,210.00 Assessment Administration and General Overhead 51,800.00 Delitpueruy Conlmgenry ~~ sabtotal: a1,9op.oo Gross Revenue Required: (20,110.00 Less: 91/92 District Grryover <43.7H1.00> Total Revenue Required: f16,350.W For 93/94 the district budgeted f1,21q.p0 for plant renovation and (4,700 for irrtgatlon upgrades ro Central Control as capital improvement projecd, a portlon of these funds are carryover from last flsral year's district budget. Equipmau purchases of f160 are budgeted for in 92/93. The tax delinquency in an amount of ft00.(q, represents the anwunt of unpaid taxes within the district. In the FY 92/93 the assessment rate for LMD M8 was S150A5/A.U.,this rata wiB increase ro f151.45 for the FY 93/94, This increase in the assessment rate Is needed ro cover the average 85% hraease in water raW from Cucamonga County Water District ro the disMCt. The following itemizes the assessmert rare for the district Unit No, of Single Family Parcel 108.00 5151.45 1.0 5151.45 E-+ C~ w E~ Q ~~ d U .-a d z ~"' ~ E.- ~o U U 0 2 CZ~' GC F~saU O ~ C6/] `.-~ U r~~~ ~ ~ a ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager F AOM: Hrad Huller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SNHJ EC T: CONEIDEAATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 93-OS - K s K GOLFING, INC. - An appeal of a condition of approval imposed by the Planning Coa®iasion requiring a storm drain in conjunction with a request to construct a golf training facility consisting of a driving range, putting green, chipping area, clubhouse, and maintenance building, in the General Industrial deaigna~ion (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Milliken Avenue - APN: 229-011-26 The Planning Co~isaion recosertends that the Citf Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission by denying the appeal submitted by the app Licant through adoption of the attached Resolution. On March 10, 1993, the Planning Co®iaeion approved the application to cone tract a golf tralninq facility on the north side of Az row Route, adjacent to the sports complex and animal shelter. The Eacllity is located on a small portion (25 scree) of the larger 146-acre property. In considering the application, the Planning Commission discussed the level of street improvements that should be required for the protect. Originally, staff had prepared a reaolut ion that required the applicant to install all street improvements on all streets abutting the legal parcel of record. This would have requi zed the applicant to widen Fx thill Bou levazd, widen Arrow Aoute, construct Milliken Avenue full- width, and install any required storm drain facilities within these streets After considering the public testimony, the Planning Commission determined that the appropriate level of improvement would be to require dedication for Foothill Boulevard, Arrow Aoute, and Milliken Avenue. Additionally, the applicant was required to fully improve the Arrow Route frontage across the area to be developed with the golf facility. 174 CITY COUNCIL STAFP REPORT DR 93-OS - K S K GOLFING April 21, 1993 Page 2 in requiring these isprovements, the Planning Commission felt that it was appropriate to require permanent improvements in front of the facility as if it were an individual parcel. This practice is conais tent with other interim uses in the City. The City has long believed that the permanent improvements should be installed with any development rather than having to go back and replace /ineta ll ia~pzovementa at a later date. Par this reason, the Commission believed that the Master Plan Storm Drain required for Arrov Route should be installed with this development. If other development was to occur on this parcel at a later date, the street would not have to be torn up to install the storm drain. The only change to the street improvements might be the relocation of a drive approaoh or addition of a street extending north frog Arrow Route. There is an existing drainage detention facility within the proposed site. Should the City Council delete the requirement for the Master Plan Storm Drain, the detention facility would have to be reconstructed. Therefore, if Condition No. 2 of the Engineering Division's special conditions is not Yequired, the following Should De required in its place: "2. Provide a drainage study for the Ieconstruction of the existing detention basin. Reconstruction of said basin shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Any berming and spillway facilities shall also be reviewed by the City Planner For landscape amenities." Attached are the staff report, minutes, and appeal letter concerning the March 10, 1993, Planning Cosm:iasion meeting. Reapectf lly submitted, Hrad uller\~N~ City Planner BH:SM/jfa Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter of Appeal Exhibit "H" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 10, 1993 ExhSbrC "C" - Planning Co®lsaion Minutes dated Mazch 10. 1993 Exhibit "D" - Planning Couotlea ion Resolution No. 93-21 Resolution of Approval for DR 93-OS 175 - aecraveo - City Cleric cirr o~ aa~, ,,, , ,.•.,:,ucq Mash 15, 1993 City of Roncho Cucamonga "'` ,' :,; _ . , . 10500 C1V1C Center Drive. pfNpFa RECEIVED MAR 15 lgg3 ^"'~cuc Rancho Cucemongo, Ce. 917j~ pM crTr CtEnx A i819iID11111~11i2;3141516 MAR 15 1993 On tterch 10, 1993 the principals of Kb~K Golii Inc, ~ s s l ~o I ~i I r~l ~ I z I3 i. i ng eppeorod be ore Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucomrmge to seek relief from the conditons set for the development of a golf center. The commission was most helpful in ronderirrg this relief with one exception. That exception is detailed on page four of DR 93-05, uMer Erigineerirg Division perogreph •2. I feel that the reason that thfs relief was rat granted was due to confusion surrounding the storm drain issue. i hope to clear up this confusion for the City Council through a detailed presentation during our eppael hearing. Our eppael to the City Council is based on the following criterte. 1. KKK Galling Inc. has only o five year gerentee for tM use of the property with a maximum period of ten years. K6K Golf has a lerM lease for interim use of the property , et some point in time the parcel wlil De developed aid K8K Golf's improvements will be demolished. 2. Krf,K Golfing Inc. will fmprove the entire ores of the project along Arrow Hwy, including the removal of the rentention basin end provide a storm drofn hookup to iha existing storm drofn ifna. 3. When the lend owner eppifes for the map to develop iha entire parcel he will be required to continue the Mestsr Plennad Storm Droln 17a The city does place itself in jeopardy of not getting the frrgrrovements, it wilt will receive these improvements when the entiro protect is developed. 4. All of the Improvements that Kb~K Golfing Inc will inatefl will De removed when the entiro parcel is developed. 5. As can be aaa iron iha enclosed plan for the development the entiro parcel, iha road C Street vrlll go right through the Golf improvements end will roqufre the leering up of the road and sewer improvements that ere now befog required. 6. The cfty will receive dedication of iha intersections of Foothill end Milliken end Arrow Hwy end Miiltken es required to DR 93-05 pg. 4 pore 4. 7. The cost of the Inatelletlon of iha storm drofn would moro then trtple the cost of the project end make it Impossible to develop. If Ka~K Golfing Inc. owned iha property, end would enjoy the long term use of the property for or have the oDflity to sell the property then these types of improvements would be moro proctfcel. ~JW/B// ~' ~r 176 2- 8. The amount Of storm drain that KKK is being osked to be installed is a smell part of the improvenxints for the totes project, but a huge expenditure far the K8K prnject. 9. We do not knew the reel benefits to the city to have lhfs storm drain extention, es it will stop et the end of the project, not to De used f~ many years until the entire parcel is developed. K6K Golf has assured the city that it will grade the properly so to maintain a catch Lxtsln on the driving range for severe storms es well a provide a hookup to the exiating storm drain. We ere eppeoling to the City Council to renrove the condition for the extentfon of the storm droin and allow KdJC Golfing Inc. to develop the golf center. Bill Kaufman Ki'~K Golfing Inc. ITT ~~ _ ~~~;\~ I ~~ ~W ~~ ~?, ' ~' '~' ~_- ~ ,,III. ~~ ~i(1f I 19 \ ~~~: V,/~ \~F8 3 I 20 16 CENr1iuM 1' -, ; •_ ~ISr. ~.~`: i2 i _-,_ _-__, i._.._..___._.. i . -__i- i I ~ I ~ ~ THE CENTRUM MASTER PLAN RANCI30 CUCA,titONGA, CALIFORNIA 178 _~_ _ _ /J \._/ ~~- ~~ G ti I~ ~~ ~i ~~ I/ ~ ~ \~ ~~ ~ ~~ i.,.o _~ i,_J/~` i ~~ ~~ ~~ > ~~ - - .;,,, ~ --n ^,r~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ -___ ~ --_ __-__ ~ _ ~ ~ ~- I I uG¢a. ~ '.c . .. ;. 1 ~ .~, ..w. +.o..... uuv.. ~+. Raub Jnucy n.• ._ u~nv u~ ~ !4yr~n cYrrw. ~. H15TORY OF PROJEL"f Rancho Valley 6oif Center was initiated to fill a void in the recreational golf facilities now available to the residents of Rancho Cucomfngo end surrounding communittes. The principals conducted a personal survey of more than 100 friends and associates who reside in Rancho Cucemonge to determine the support for the a project. The results were unemiously in favor of such o project. The search for en appropriate site was very time consuming, es most lend owners/developers were not interested in lend leases for long periods of time. The Cettelus group, after much discussion finally offered a site on 4th street in the city of Ontario. The principals convinced the Cotteius group that their site adjacent to the new baseball stadium would be better suited for this project. How the site in Rancho Cucemonge next to the new stadium is the location for the new Golf learning Center. 180 THE PRINCIPALS BILL KAUFMAN -Resident of Rancho Cucomonge for seven years. Married with an eleven year old girl end twin boys 8 veers old. Owns a business located in Rancho Cucomonge employing 60 people. Coechs two cotter teams and one Little League teem yearly. Sponsor at least five youth sports teems ennuelty. Support Rancho Cucemongo schools with sizeable paper donations. President of Deercreek Homeowners Assoc. HAROLD KNEELER- Resident of Rancho Cucemongo for fifteen years. Married with one grown child. Hes coached Little League teems. Sponsors at least three youth sports teams annually. Board of Directors of Deeroreek Homeowners Assoc. 181 ~' k" BEN€.°ITS TO THE CITY tl< COMMUNITY A. The city will be the home of a 25 acre recreational facility for the whole community to enjoy. For ages 5 to 100 both mole and female. B. The facility will supply jobs for approx. 11 people. C. There will De up to f 1.2mm in yearly revenue es a tax Dase for the city. D. The project will provide o beauftful backdrop to the visitors of the new baseball stadium. E. As pert of the project the holding basin end dam on Arrow Hwy. which is elweus covered with graffiti will be removed end rn~'aced with trees end schrubs. F. Rancho Veiley Golf Center will provide to the various Iocai sports end charitable groups a means to raise revenue for their needs. G. The presence of a facility that will be open up to 16 hours doily with lights will hopefully help to reduce the defacing of property, such es the new wells surrounding the Baseball stadium that are now covered with graffiti. 1~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 10, 1993 T0: Chairman and Members of [he Planning Com-aissi on FROM: Brad 9uller, City Planner BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DBVBLOPMENT AEVISW 93-OS - K 6 R GOLFING - A request to construct a golf training facility, consisting of a driving range, putting green, chipping azea clubhouse, and maintenance bui ldin q, in the Gene• _ Industrial Distzict (Subarea B) of the Industrial Area Specific plan, located on the north aide of Arrow Route, east of Milliken Avenue - APN: 229-011-26. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Detention Basin; Terra Vista Planned Coam;unity (Hospital and Ae la red Facilities) South - Vacant; Industrial Arn_a Specific Plan, Subarea 9 (Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial) East - Sports Complex and Animal Shelter; Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 8 (General Industrial) West - Vacant; Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea B (General Industrial) H. General Plan Deai gnatione: Project Site - General Industrial Noz th - Co~erciel South - Heavy industrial Eaat - General Industrial West - General Industrial C. Site Characteristics: The site is presently developed with two detention facilities in the southern portion to handle the water entering the site from the north. The southeast detention facility consists of a large earther. berm and concrete spillway adjacent to Arrow Route. 'Phis is the location proposed for the golf facility. A smaller detention facility is located to the west. The balance of the site is vacant. Ex '. b+t" B" 183 PLANNING COtRAI55ION STAPF REPORT DR 93-OS - K 6 K GOLFING March 10, 1993 Page 2 D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Driving Range 1 space 100 100 pez tee Retail 2,000 1 space/ 8 9 250 sq. ft. TOTAL 108 109 ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to develop a golf training facility on a small portion (25 acres) of the larger 1a6-acre parcel bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the north and Arrow Route on the south. The applicant is proposing to provide 100 tee areas from which to hit. A putting green is proposed for the southwest portion of the site. A chipping area is proposed for the southeast portion to practice sand shots. A 2,000 square foot clubhouse will contain a pro shop and a small kitchen/eating area. A separate 900 Square Eoot huilding will house the maintenance equipment. H. Desi qn Aeview Committee: The De ai gn Review Com:ittee (MCN ie 1, Valletta, Coleman) reviewed the plane and recommended revisions be provided to add:esa the following concerns: i. The clubhouse design was not acceptable. The applicant should work with ste°.f to explore alternatives to address the following Stems. The revtsed plane should be reauhroitted for additional Committee review. a. A roof should be provided. b. Variation should be provided In the building plan ea. A possible Solution could be attaching the maintenance building to the clubhouse. c. Elements/details consistent with the animal shelter should be considered. d. Combining the maintenance building with the clubhouse. 2• The height of the fencing along the east properly Line should be re-evaluated to assure that stray golf balls do not enter the adjacent Sports Complex. 1" PLANNING CClT1ZSSION STAFF REPORT DR 93-OS - K b K GOLFING March 10, 1993 Page 3 The applicant should provide netting material color samples for review. 6. The poles and netting along the east property line should be located to avoid conflict with the trees on the adjacent property Because of the applicant's concerns about off-site improvements, the Coimni tree agreed to schedule the item for Planning Commission consideration. The applicant indicated a willingness to revise the project design. If the design issues are not resolved prior Co the Commission meeting, a crondition of approval will be placed on the project requiring the design isauea to be resolved prior to the issuance of building permits. Technical Review Cou®ittee: On February 17, 1993, the Technical Review Committee considered the application and provided the applicant with a list of recommended conditions of approval. Among these conditions are the requirements for street improvement9 including the following: Arrow Route - The widening ac roar the entire frontage of the legal parcel (roughly 2,560 feet) and storm drain installation from the east property line to Milliken Avenue. 2. Foothill Boulevard - The widening across the entire frontage of the legal parcel (roughly 2,170 feet) and the installation of the landscaped median from Orchard Street to the next median opening to the east. 3. Milliken Avenue - Construction of the street, full width, and related storm drain improvements. Whi Le these requirements may seem extensive considering the size of the area and frontage being developed, they are consistent with City ordinances and policies. The Municipal Code requires the inata ll at ion of improvements along all street frontages of a parcel on which development is proposed. ThereEOre, these improvements are required even though the golf facility is only occupying a portion aE the larger legal parcel. In reviewirq the Municipal Code se ctlon, staff believes that relief from this condition can only be granted by the City Councl 1. Therefore, the applicant would have to appeal any decision of the planning Commission. Staff recommends, however, that the Planning Commission discuss the issue and, if appropriate, provide a recommendation to the City Council, D. F.nv izonmertal Assessment: StafF has completed the Initial Study and determined that the project will not re au It in any adverse environmental impacts. If the Planning Commission concurs, is auance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. 185 PLANNING COMMIS9ION STAPP REPORT DR 93-OS - R R R GOLP INC. Narch 10, 1993 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 93-09 through adoption of the attached Reeolutlon and issue a Negative Declaration. Respec ly s 0rad H ez City Tanner BB:9N/jfa Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - 91te Plan exhibit "C" - Landscape Plena Exhibit "D" - Bui lding Elevations Exhitit "E" - Letter from Applicant Reeolutlon of Approval 186 -------~~.-i ~~ ~, ~ ~-' ~ `- ~~~~. _~~~ 3A• tl3153M 90tl~ ~-"' - - - ---~ i~ ~. i. I i~ `- ~~~f \~ __j ~ .1 ~ ~ ~~ `~~„~J ~~ _ y `, m ~' ~ o .,~ v ~~~ ~' a m •~ '~ X a~w a3 add v 187 -Js ~~ ~~ \ "i"~J ~~1 w4 y y~-~ ~~ /~ ~n r . ~ / L !~ ~_ ___ rx mn~~i~uinnni-iun ~ ---~---- `-----~ L -~ I ~ ~, _.Kb, b_-a _~ t. - Project: CITY OF A AMONGA Tltle: ` ~ ~'" ~ >~' ~/ Pu- I ON Exhibit: ~ Date: 1F38 1 C _ ~- CJ .. V C ~ ~ C C ~J i`i`- F _ ~ ~ ~- ~~^^~ ~~~ o v ~ ~~~ ~~' ~ ~ Gi~''i f~7T~'f~ ~.eb. CITY OF R AMONGA VLA f N Project: ,`~:~ 1' ; '~ ;:,r~, Title: ~,,. ai~~ ~~,, ~ .,. a Exhibit: c' i pass: rr, 1~ i ,f i i ~ t i ~! ~c~ ~ ~ ~~ ±~-~ F iis! °'` `}~ ii ` i :; i i ~ ~: i i~;i s e ® ~ e~o ~~o ,az: V ii ~~ ~ ~e0 ~O ~. .. O~ Iv .o i ~: d o ~, °~ .~ m a '0^ m L x ai=W 0 <o r ~.~ ~z oa r U 1~ 4 t Ff ~N fM~ _ M ~y~v` t..~ ~~, ' "x~ AMONGA CITY OF R~~~~k~~S10N PLAN~iI z ~ u~IL ~N ~~ ® '.. ~'1 ~ ~q~y1NY ~IM1~((e ~~~ ~ry INn ,- ~y~d •Wi_~N1Mi Project: ~'S' ~~~ Title: Exhibit: ~''~ Date: 191 .1 fgd(.T6VA.t~CE ,~//tGt/N(,, ",~ a '~v ^Y. CITY OF R AMONGA PLA IN N Project: ~' '' ,5_ -~~ Title: ~zr/.,>.. , ~ - Exhibit: ~ ~' Date: 1~ ~ ~ ~ r HISTORY OF PROJECT RencAo Volley 6o1f Center was lnitieted to fill a void in tAe recreational golf focilities novr available to the residents of Rendro Cucemirge end surrounding comrmnities. The principals conducted a personal survey of more than 100 friends and easociates who reside in Rancho Cucemaige to determine the support for the a project. TAe results were unemiausly in favor of such o prefect The search for en appropriate site was very time consuming, es most lend owners/developers were rwt interested to tend leases for long periods of time. The Ceitelus group, after mucA dlscuasian finally offered a site an 4tA street in the city of Ontario. The principals conWnced the Cettelus group that their sits edjerent to the new baseball stadium would De better suited far tAia project Ndw the site in RencAo Cucamonga next to the new stadium is tAe location for the new Oolf Learning Center. ~iTY Of pECEIYED .~ PLNNNIN6 DIYI~5IONONOA ~ MAR 09 19993 7i8't9t5,s ( MaYf.h \ e, 1~ THE PRINCIPALS BIIL KAUFMAN -Resident of Rancho Cucmionge for seven years. Married with an eleven year old girl and twin boys 8 yeors old. Owns a business located in Rancho Cucernorge employing 60 people. Coechs two coccer teems and one Little Leogue teem yeorly. Sponsor et least five youth sports teems enaually. Support Rendw Cucamonga schools with sizeable paper donetians. President of Desrcreelc Norneowners Assoc. HAROLD KNEELER- Resident of Ramiro Cucamonga for fifteen years. Married with one grown child Has coecl~ad Little League teems. Sponsors at hest three youth sports teems amMwlly. Board of Directors of Deercreelc Fbrrbowners Assoc. BENEFITS TO THE CITY 6 COhM1UNITY A. The city will be the home of a 25 acre recreetioirol feciltty for the whole community to enjoy. For egos 5 io 100 both mole end female. 8. The facility will supply jobs for approx. 1 t people. G There will be up to S 1.2mm in yearly revenue es a tax base for the city. D. The project will provide a beeuttfui backdrop to the visitors of the new baseball stadium. E. As pert of the prefect the holding basin end dam on Arrow Hwy. which is always covered with groftiti will be removed end replaced with trees end schnibs. F. Rancho Valley Golf Center will provide to the various local sports end charitable groups a means to raise revenue for their needs. 6. The presence of a feciltty that will De open up to 16 hours dally with lights will hopefully help to reduce the deleting of property, such es the new wells surrouMing the Baseball stadium that ors rrow covered with graffiti. ,~',rs/iBi/- " ~ 3 195 IiELP MIE aRE REQUESTING FROM Tli~ clTV ~ aaHCeo cucalfoliGa This project is being funded witA the principals personal savings es wail es looms that tAe principals hove secured. The lease tAet we have agreed upon only gerentees us five years in this site, with a possible extension for another five years. We ere fully prepared to improve the arses that era directly essocieted witA the project, but we era not financially able to budget tar improvements to tAe entire parcel owned Dy Cattalos Grmip. It was a very difficult job to convince the Cottelus Group to enter into the agreement for the Rancho Cucamonga 1mN1 as it does rat yield them much revenue versus the value of the lend. They have made It very clear to us tAot ft will rat be possible for the upper mensgement of Cattalos to agree to spend funds on our project to improve tAe entire site . TAey have agreed to incur the expense of hooking up to the storm drain if we fill In the retention basin, end that is ail tAey will do. Our project covers only 14>i of the total parcel with 95>< of tAet being e gross end water range. Our project is contemplating a maximum of 3000 ft of building end one acre of parking. We feel tAet ell of tAe improvements that we ere required to make will be torn up aIlan our lease expires. Ws en rt,wstisg that tM city slier ss is istttrsn Epp asst sf Arrsw Hwp., witp ss~ASll clllis ~'sttsrs, stilizt s sptie systsls isstsaA si sxtssiis~ tM sswsr iis^., ssst Mt N rgslrN is psrfsrss ssy sI tbs sthsr •/fsits is>•rstasssls tAst wsn rsgwstN w citg sginssrisp. The bottom Itna to this project is that KKK Gott Aes ra leveregs with the Cattalos 9-WP to have tAem essiat in of(site improvements. Kd,K Golf hos e specific budget to Irreteil lhls project based on a five year return. We teal the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga end Its residents will benefit greatly trorn the project ea outlined above with no apparent negative impact. We ere asking for your assistance in making this project a reality. ti~ , Bill Keufine '` Herold Kee ter EYH/aT`~ io ~ ~ 196 A. squat for the deign aview of building Qevations and dstailw site pl or LoG 1 through 21 of a previously approved tract consisting of 38 •in amily lots on 15.7 scree of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 inq unite par acre), located south and east of Rsd Hill country Club 0 south of Glle Corson - APN: 207-631-01 through 11 and 207-661-0 ough 30. Related file Variance 89-12. B• - - - A request to •llw reduced yard utbacks on B lots, a reduced minimum average trout yard eatba ar all lot •, height ertsnsl.ons above 35 feet on 3 lour and a reduc ^wry structure setback on Lot 2, for a prwiously approved tract map c tlnq of 38 single family lots on 15.7 acres of land in the Low Rssi al District (2-d dwelling unlt• per acre), located south end uet NL11 Country Club Drive, south of Celle Corason - APN: 207-631-01 qh 23 and 207-6d1-O1 througR 15. Related file Design Review for Tract 0. TIME EXTENSION POR T - - A tequut for a 3-lot aubdiviaion and deeiq view of 115 condominiwa unite on 10.27 ecru of lan4 in the Medium ontial District (8-36 dwelling unite per acre), located north of Arrow ay aM cut of Baker Avenue - APN: 207-201-66. D. - - A request for • residential subdivioion ud deign review o ondaminium unite on 3.56 sera of land in the Medium Ruidential Dietrl 11 dwelling unite per acre), locabd at the southeut corner o[ Archlba nee and Church Street - APNS 1077-332-26. Notion; Mowd by Melchor, uconded Dy ToLtoy, carried 5-O,~dopt the Canwnt Calwdar. 6. ENVIRONMENTIL ASBESEMENT A_~ DEVEL/~PMENT vVIEN 9 0 R i R O'PIDIC - A request to eonetruM • golf training facility, consist inq o! a driving range, putt inq green, chipping arq, clubhouw, and mainGnance 6uildinq, within the General Industrial District (9ubarea 8) of tM Industrial Are Spseltic Plan, located on the north aids of Arrow Route, ust of Mllltken Avenue - APN; 229-011-2 d. Scott Murphy, Auoclate Planner, pruented rho eta[! report. Chairman McNlel invited public cosmant. sill Rlufun, R i R Coltlnq, Inc. BE6B RoehuUr Avenue, Rancho Cucsnanga, introduced Narold Rnel Lr the other principal in the pobntial venture. Ha eoemented they are coneldsrinq • Lnd luu of • small portion of a lsrger parcel for what they feel 1• a relatively short pario8 of time in which to Plann inq Commis^ion Minutes -2- March 10, 1997 Ex1n~b.t"C." 197 recoup thdr capital. He uLd they have s flea-year lease with t possible option for another five years, howwar, they may haw to move to another •iN for the ucond rive yore. Ha stated that the off-alto iaprovsmsnts being requested would require many millions of dollars which they could not Eund. Hs observed that the City wail get the improvements when the sntira parcel is developed, at which time the golfing project would most likely U removed. Ha requested that they W requited to Loprove only 600 fwt of Arrow H1gAway with •idawalks and landscaping and appropriate landscaping in the parking lot. Na •aid the property owner agreed to put Ln a stator drain near the autern portion of the property Ln exchange for removal of the berm and tataininq wall on Arrw and channeling the water toward the storm drain. Ne said they planned to elevate the front part of their prof eei to allow tM golf range io retain water during a 100-year storm. He uid tMy had looked at oihar sites but they preferred ihla alto. He remarked they have budgeted $400,000 for the project and were not financially capable of spending the many millions of dollars requested for off-cite improvamsnte. Re said they hau offered a purchase option, but the property owner was not will Lnq to consider that alternative at rota time, pe eiatad they would G willing to stipulate that they would make Lmprovatinta it they were able to purchue tM yropsrty. Ha thougAt the City could use • large recreational Lacility to W utilized by botA adults and children. He felt it would W a good spot for fund raters or puctiw by aohool teams. He oburved LMy would provide 11 jobs and a tax base whack would probably range tram $750,000 to $1,500,000 per year. He said Lhay were looking at the project for hopefully ten yetis, but if they were able to purchase the prof set, they would then W able to ^1t and calk about long-Grm improvements. Commiu lour Nelchar requutad • summary of the applicant's propoul for Arrow RoUL Lap[OVamanU. Mr. Aauttin proposed that they improve 600 feet of Arrow RouU going wwt trap the uaLrn property line with curbs and quttase, •SdewalM, and landaesping including trees. He felt the light• in their parking lot would provide adequate light inq along Arrow Route. He said Lhay planned to landscape both •idn of the range including CM extreme north larder. He remarked the landawpinq would include qru• and itus with lrrigatlan. He said the property owner ha• also co®itted to ependin9 $50,000 to Aook up to the storm drain. Chalztin McNial asked the dlmenalons of the propesiy. Mr. Kaufman reepondad It is shoo[ 900 fur along Arrow Highway by 1,200 feet deep. Chairman McNLl noted that Che applicant wu only suggeatln9 improving 600 feet along Arrow Highway. Nt. Kaufman stood the project entrance Ls 200 fur from tM tier boundary wall and they propoud impsovlnq anoCMr <00 tut pact the driveway. Chairman NcNiel ukad if it would be caepLq pertinent lmprovsment• - concrate curb and gutUt, ^idtwalk, etc. P fanning Commission Nlnutu -3- Masnh 10, 1997 1.70 Hr• Rau[man replied they had proposed asphal^, curb. Ha felt ehe improvemmnt• wovld W torn out if their project ie taken out whm the larger parcel is lsryroved. He add thmy would do whaUvsz Se raqulred in front of their projaM, including permanent concrete curb and gutters. He proposad the additional 300 feet Of frontage to contain qru• end Lndaupinq. Ha said th.y had suggmsted 600 feet of improvmments, becauw that seemed to tit their Dudgat. He thought they may W able to dm the 900 fNt. He stated they would like to haw the project on a septic system instead of having to hook up to a permanent Bever line. Harold Rnm1 Lr, 5633 Canister, Aancho Cucamonga, said they wmre flexible in the design of the structure and would try to make ii as appealing a possible ksmpinq the budget in mind. chairman Hcximl cammentW that the facilities put in ao far haw gone a long way tovsrtl beautifying the neighborhood and the City would expect an aterace lve bu 1341nq, noting that the facility could potmnt f.ally W thane for tan years or longer. Hr. Kaufman eaid Lhmy would provide what the City wants. There warm no additional public caamsnia. Commluioner ToLtoy ukad if it is within thm planning Cos~lsdon•• purview to decide what off-site improvearnta may Um raquirmd of if • csrtdn minimum is required by ordinance, thereby nsuuitatinq tM City Council's apprwd to davian Erse thst ordinaoq. Brad Buller, City Planner, uld the Commission had the discretion to dmiermine what is ngonable. CasmLdoner Valletb qumstioned staff •• position on the issue o! septic versus saver rysemm. Mr. Murphy rupondsd the Luum could W addtmusd at tM stair Lwl. Hs aid there an certain proceduzms wh1cR muse W lollowmd and Getin9 which must b. completmd eo G sun a amptlc system is LsuibU and would Dm pmrmitbd by Cucamonga County water District and the Building and Safety Division. Commissionmr Vallstte notmd Chm applicant had msntionmd parking lot light inq bui not street lighting. Hr. Murphy rmpllsd that tM City would regain full Smpiovmmanh, which wou10 most likely include strsat lights. Dan Jemme, senior Civil 6nginNr, concurred it would include atnet llghn. Commiuiones Mmleher eked what sort o[ transition currmntly mxisb on Arrow wnt of the animal shelter and sports park and what sort o! transition would M nquirsd for thL project. planning Commission Minutms -1- March 10, 1997 199 Nr. James /toted thnt eurxuntly the lane closest to the cutD going wear on Atroa is a right-Corn only lane into the sports complex because the Arrest does not continua full-width want of the comp lax project. Ha acid ahen the street is Completed full width to tM west, the lane is proposed to ba s through lane as wall ee being ustd for turns into the complex. Re said wish ihs improvements Deing contemplated the right lane could either be a right- turn lane into the golf facility or it could be a through lane transit ioninq to the went back to than narrower pavement. commissioner Nelcher asked if the applicant were required to put in the full width of Arrow for the 900 fact of frontage, if another 1,000 foot transition mould be required to mow the traffic back to the narrower rtrot aeciion. Mr. Jame aid any tranLLtion lane would b/ rather long if the tzsaitianinq wets no! /farted until after ihs driveway. Paul Aougsau, Traffic Engineer, noted that the full improvement of Arrow along the 900 teat of trontaga would permit a proper lane drop Lt the City chooass to pick up a full through lane at AocM•Ur earryinq it peat the sports complex entrance io this project. Hs acid ainca there is only one lane of traffic approaching to the east of Roc Mater, ha tlid not feel it is currently necaazy to pick up two lanes at Rochester snd then drop back to one lane just peK thin pzcjact. He felt it would De better Co have one through lane and a right-turn lane onto Rochutsr, into the sports complex snd then into tM proposed project. commLsioner Nelcher ukad if that meant Ue proposed 600 lest of Lnprovaments would G adequ•b for traffic afsty. Nr. Aougau sold that would G Correct at ibis tams and tM remainder of the frontage would be used for an uphalt transition, which would not necaeaarily M sa long es a traffic transition which Ls ttrlped ouC on the street. comminlonar Nelcher ssked if Lt would De doirabls Eras • traffic safety standpoint to require the applicant to make Lmprovements to a reasonable QLLnw v»et of Lb driveway. Nr. Rouguu stated LC L standard to require full-widtA improvements across tM full trontaga o[ pzojecN to qiw the Cliy more flexibility to do striping changes and transitions beyond the project boundary. Ne euggabd that the traffic tapering W accampl lshed through paint on CM pevsment a oppoasd to narrowing the pavement. Chairmen McNisl obwrved that iM Municipal Cods requires strut improvements along all street trontaga of • parcel but that this Dro3ect encompaaes only s small portion of a much larger parctl. He ulud if tM Commie loam wished to acquiesce io the applicant's desire to improve only tM frontage along their pore LOn of the parcel and Lf in doing ao would the Cammlulon 6a meat inq the requirements of the community and whet is Dent for the City. commie Loner Val LtN remarked that the applicant hsd Dan very willing co work with the Dalgn Review Committee rsgardinq the building structure. Sne PLnnlnq Commission Nlnuta -5- March 10, 199] felt the drvelopment will W an saui to the City tnd the location would be a good one for the type of facility proposed. she thought a reasonnble alternatives roue would W peat. Comniuloner Melche caked for clarification ihai [he Commiulon would have the authority to determine thst improvement^ along only the portion of the percal the applicant is developing would meet the Municipal Coda requirmosnts. Mr. Buller affirmed the Coamiulon could make that deternination. comaiuioner He1cMr thought the applicant should M granted relief so tar ore Milli]un and Poothill arc concerned and ha favored gluing the applicant ore much relief is pouible on arrow Roub. Mr. Bullet stated that staff supports that position so far as afros! imptoveasnb but would recommend dedication of all rights-of-way eurrcundinq the entire parcel. Commissioner Melchor agret0 ihai would W beat. Chairaun McNLl invltsd further public comment. Mr. Kaufman stated M had talked with the property owner regarding thou dedications and he felt there was • Rronq pnulbility thou dedications could be made although M could not quarantu Lt. Mr. Buller said he had also spdksn with repruutatiws o[ the property owner end Lt did not uem out of CM question Dsewo they relic they would haw to make those dedications eventually when the full pzapsrty is developed. Ne uid their main concern seas to be any currant out-ol-pocket expsnua. Commiasionmz Chi[iu felt the Laeility is appropriately located and mould he an aunt to the sports comp Lx. She thought it would W appropriate to relieve the applicant of oblilJation to do the soothill and Milliken improvements if the dedications are obteinsd. She wu eonoerned with the propoud level of improvamend on Arrow Route. She noted that the project may Let tM full ten years and the property tc the west may develop in that time. she suppotLed the improvement of the full 900-foot Arrow tronesge with striping eo allow future opening a[ the lane. Mr. James rsmazkad that 6nginNrlnq staff would lllu tM Commiuion tc consider requiring the storm drain Lnetallation along the portion of arrow RouN that is improved. xe noted that it has been the City's desire tc avoid having to qo back and tear up shut improvements in order to install storni drains. Mr. Murphy noted that even if only 600 fur of Arrow Route L improved, deeication would be required for the full struE length. Coasain LOner Chitin uksd who would pay for the additional 300 feet in front of the portion of the project being devQoped. P Lnninq Commie ion H1nuNe -s- March 10, 1993 Wl Nr. Hanlon remarked that the project is only a lease hold and the developer to the weal i• the property owner of the lease hold •ite. He eaitl each a condition could W imposed on a eubdLvie ior. map if the property owner tppl ied for a lot split in order to have the ability sell off a portion of the parcel. Canmiseioner Tolstoy supported Lhe projsc[, Dut he felt the rights-of-way need to ba dedicated along Poothill Boulevards Milliken avenue, end Arrow Rou[• for frontages along the entire parcel. He noted that would not cause the owner of tM parcel any out-ot-pocket exprnus. Ha also thought the Eu 11 900 feet of Arrow in front of the project should be improved including a right-turn lane Lnto the project'• driveway with a paint strips tranaitioa west of the driveway beck to tea narrower road. He felt full improvsmsnts should including concrsb curb and gutter, atzeet lights, sta. Chairman McNiQ felt the project will ba an tact to the community but ha agreed that full dedication of Paothill, Milliken, and arrow end full improvament• of the 900-foot frontage of the property would be appropriate. He thought it would aLo W autheL LCally neeeuary to improve the full frontage area. He concurred that the applicant had been willing to work with the Design Review Cammittu. Mat ion: Moved by Chitiw, ucondsd Dy Melchsr, to iuue s Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Developawnt Review 93-OS with modifications to require dedication for atzeet rights-of way along PootDlll Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, and Arrow Route and full street impravaawnt• along the 900-foot Arrow Route frontage of tM project. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: CoMMISSIONEABx CHZTIEA, MCNIEL, MELCFBR, TOLSTOY, VALLETT6 N063x COMMIBSIONER9x NONE ABSENT: COlD1I33 ZONLRS: NONE -earned • e e no additional public co®enta. t. - A diecuseion of Public safety C on Assolut ion No. 93-001. Brad Buller, City Planner, aced the resolution [orwarded by the Public safety Commiuion. He uld th ie safety CommLalon ruolution requuta that CM Planning Coawiu ion con• equirinq etripinq, traffic •igne, and atop •igne cone istsnt with thou u n the pu611o zight•-of-way and raga irinq clop •igne at •11 exits o[ al rcial csnGrs. Hs lnd icated that stall had awl with the Traff Lc 8nginee hs City Attorney's office and bellwed come of the concerns raiud by tM ' Salsty Coemin ion are valLd but tM attorney had come legal concerns wit ~ resolution if tM Planning Cammiu ion Caku [ormal action. Hs noted tM Planning PLnninq Cxxnmiulon MinuNS -7- Harch 10, 1997 WG RESOLUTION NO. 93-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CL•CAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 93-05, A REOVEST TO CONSTRUCT A GOLF TRAINING FACIL2T Y, CONSISTING OF A ORIVI NC RANGE, PUTTING GREEN, CHIPPING AREA, CLUBHOUSE, AND MAINTENANCE BUI LDINC, ZN THE GENERAL IND USTR:AL DISTRICT (SUBAREA E; OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-017-26 A. Recitals. (i( K 6 K Golfing has filed an application for the approval of Dwelopment Review No. 93-05 as described in the title of thi• Roso lut ion. xezslnettar in ehis Resolution, the subject Development Review request i• roferrsd to as "the application." (ii) On cha 10th tlay of March 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said mooting on that date. (iii( All legal prerequ isito• prior to the adoption of Chie Resolution hove occurred. B. Pow luc ion. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby Eound, determined, end rosolvetl by [he Planning Commission of the City oC RanchO Cucamonga a• follower 1. This Commission hereby apecLfice lly Cinds ghat all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resc lution are true and correct. 2. Eased upon substantial evidence pruentsd to this Comniaeion during the above-referenced meet inq on Marsh 30, 1993, including written and oral staff report e, thla CommLU ian hereby spec i[ically tind• a• fo !lows: a. Tho applicec LOn applies to property located between Foothill Eoulavard and Arrow Route at Milliken Avenue with street frontages of 2,560 foot along Foothill Eou lovard and 2,170 feet along Arrow Route, and is present ly improved with datenc ion bas Lna, the balencs of the Bite is vacant; and b. The property to the notch of tM •ub}set siG i• deugnac ed Eor commercial uses and i^ tleve loped with a detsnt lon basin, the property to the south is designated for industrial uso• and i• vacant, and the proper[ iee to tM oasn and wut ere designated for industrial uses and contain a sports complex/animal shelter end a manufacturing building, rospece Lvely; and 'E~ch'~b;t "p„ 203 PLANNING COMMISSION i 9GUT:ON N0. 3:-21 OR 9J-05 - K 6 K GOLF ...G March 10, 1993 Pnge 2 c. Tha development of the golf training facility is Iona intent with the General InduaC rial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Industrial designation of the General Plan; and d. The application, together with the attached conditions of approval, will comply with all appl Sc ab7a standards of the Intlu striai Area Spec ifie Plan and the Development Code. J. eaaetl epon the subatant lal evidence present rd to to is Commission during the abovs-referenced meeting and upon the spacif is findings of facto eat forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commies ion hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objets ivee of the General Plan; and b. That the propo bed use is in accord with the object ive• of the Development Coda and the purPOSes of the district in which eM siu is located; and c. Tha[ the proposed u9e is in compliance with each of Che applicable provie ions of the Developmenc Code; and d. Thai the proposed wee, together with the Good it ion• applicable thereto, will not be detrimental eo the puDlie health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvsmenta in the vicinity. 4. :hie Commission hereby finds and cerCif lee that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance wits Che G11[ornia Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, fort ne e, Chie Commission hereby ieaues a Negative Drclar at io n. 5. 9aaed upon one find ing• entl cone lusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approve the application subject to each and every condition sec foreh below and in the Standard Cond ie ions, attached hereto and incorporated herein 6y ehi• re[rrance. PlannlnD Div Talon 1) The ne fight of the fens inq along the east property line shell be designed co assu rs that stray golf balls do not enter the adjacent property. Information to demonsi rate the safety of Ghe fence height 9ha11 be aubm itCaQ Co the City planner Cor review end approval prior Co ch• issuance of building permits. 2) The final net color shall be rev Lord and approved by the Deign Review Commute prior to the issuance of building pecm its. Gtl`! PLANNING COMNISSION F OLUTION N0. 33-21 DR 93-09 - R 6 K COLF ..~G March 30, 1993 Paso 3 J) The pc lag and netting along the east property line shall be located to avoid conflict with the trees ac maturity an ens adjacent property. Tha final location s-..11 be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 4) The clubhouse design shall be revised and submitted for additional Design Review Committee review and approval prior to the issuance of any permits. Tha plena shall cone ider the following: a) A roof. b) Variation in the building plane •. c) Elements/details consistent witn the animal shelter. d) Comb fining Cho maLntenance build lnq with the clubhouse. 5) The po lea end netting shall be properly maintained at all times. 6) Landaeapinq shall be provided within the at reececape getbark area to match Che established theme for Arrow Route. 7) Pu rsuent to prow iaiona of California Public Resources code Section 21089(b), this application shall not Oe operative, vested or Elnal, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice o! De eerminat ion (NOD) regarding the associated env lronmer,t al action is filed and posted wlih the CUrk of the Noard of Su perv isor• of the County o[ sen Bernardino; and (2) ary and all required filing Cee• auaseed pursuant to California Fish and Came Code Section 711.4, together with any required handling charges, ar• paid to she County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. Tha applicant shall provide the Planning Dapa rtmen[ with a stamped and oon[ormed copy of the NOD togather with a rata ipt showing that all fees have been paid. PLANNING COMMISSION 'O L'J T:Oil :10. 93-c'. DR 93-OS - K 6 K GOLe .JG Merch 10, 1993 Page 6 Zn the event thrs app=icacion rs determin@d exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provisions of the California Fish and Came C@d¢, or the g'a idelines promu lgated thereunder, exca p< Eor payment of any required handling cnarge for 'ili ng a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed ru 11 and void. E ro ineerina Div iaion 1) "NO Parking/Seoppir.9" signs shall be posted on all pubi is street frontages. 2) Complete the 4astee Pla r.ned S[O rm Drain Line 17a in Arrow Route Erom its existing terminus frOn[ing ChC 9Ub)@CC palCel ad]0<ent t0 tRe @aat cc the westerly Limits of ens development. Standard drainage fees Eor the site shall be creditetl to the cost of the Maatar Planned portion of the facilities and the developer shall be eligible for reimbutaemanC of coats in excess of [he fees in accordsnce with city policy. 3) Provide a drainage study to determine Elowe reachinq the sit¢ from the north. Construct protection from [hoes flows on site of install the Foothill Master Plan Storm Ora in attortling to the Terra Vista Master Plan from east of Milliken Avenue to ins ex LSt inq storm drain at Rochester Avenue as determined by the City Engineer. 4) Provide add LC Tonal dedication at ens intersections of Milliken Avenue and Arrow Route and Milliken Avenue and Foothill Boulevard as required by the Crty Engineer. 6. The Secretary eo ehrs COmm 19910n shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADO PTEO THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 1993. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L+IIIJ PLANNING COMH ISSION F 9LVTION VO. 3]''<! DR 93-0E - K 6 K OGLE .,,C March 30, 1993 Pago 5 Ir Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Cortmisaion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cart ify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introtlucad, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commiaeicn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on ehs 10th day of March 1993, by the following emote-to-uit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHZTIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHE R, TOLSTOY, VALLETT6 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE WI ~N4y ~~ DEPARTMENT OF ~~'°~~'~ ~~~a~~~®~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLICANT: ` L~ ~%~><i,~+ ~i ~~, LOCATION: •/ ~ ~~~r,ya' /-"/il ~//i~~ r: Those items checked are Contlnbns of Approval APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING ONISION , (714) 9811801, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONOR'ION3: A. Tlm e Limes ~ / / t . Approval snail expire, unbsa exlerMed by the Plannkq Commission, N buibinp pemwts are JJ- not issued or approved use has not commenced wNtNn 24 r110fatls from the dateof approval. 2. DevebpmerNDesgn ReNeW ahaN be approved prier t0 r r J~- 3. Approval of Tergative Tract Wo. U QraMed suged b the approval of J-1_ a. The devebpershaecomrrerres, partblpate in, and cortwmmets orcausebbe commenced, JJ_ partbpated in, or corroummale0. a Alsll?Reoa ComrturtNy FadNtiea District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Firo Prdecbn DBLM l0 8nana wrrotmctlon anrYa maimenance of a lire station to serve the devebprrtsrtt. TM stMbn ariall W located, daegned, and W i8 to all specNicatbrra d the Ranclq Cucamonga Fsa Presgbn Dietrbl, and shah become the DistricYS property upon completbn. The equipment shag be sabcted by the Distric in accordance wNh Na needs. In any Ouildkq of a etalbn, the devebpsr shah comply with all applicabb laws arW regulttlbns. The CFD slfaN be betted by the DbbIG and the devebper a/ tfM time racordalbn d the final map OOCUre. _ 5. Prior to recordatbn of the Onal map or the Issuance d buNelnp psmMla, whichever comes ! J / lust, the applicam shall cortearN fo, or partbpata irt, the satabushmem of a Melb-Roos _- __ Community FacilNba DIaL1ct for tfte mrrotnrction and nwrttenartce d necessary school facilities. However, if any SGtool district has prevbusy eatabNSlMd such a Community FaCilNies District, the app8cant Shah, in the a8emetNa, cOrteem b the annexatbn of the , projeq site ifdo IM territory 01 such exletln8 Dietrlp prior to the rscordatbn of the final map or the issuance of lwNding Permks, whicftaver comes Ilrat. Further, M tfte a8eaed School district has rqt lomted a McBo•Rooe Community Facilities Dietrbl within twelve monlha from the date of approval of tM project and prior to tlb reoordatbn of the lnal map or issuance of bolding pencts for sad project, this oondAbn shah he deemed null aM void. sc2/sl tonx ~~~m a~ This condilbn shall be waived X the City receives rwtice that the applicant and all aHeped schooldisoicls have emered ireo an agreement to privatery accommodate arty and all xlbol irtpacts as a result of this Protect. 6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building pertnes when no map is .JJ__ involved, written certification from the aXeuted water distrbt that adequate sewer and water facileies are or will ba available to serve ttb proposed project shall t>e submitted to the Department of Community Devebpmenl. Such letter must have been issued by the water district wehin 90 days prbrb linal mapapproval in thanase of su60Nkbn orpriorto issuance of pemvls in the case of alt other residential projects. B. Slte Devebpmerrt / 1. The see shall be devebped and maintained in acwrdarce web the approved pWns which JJ- incbde sea pans, archeapural elevations, exterior materials and cobra. landacapirp, sign program, and grading on file in the Pteflrfing DNisbn, the Wr1dNI0n6 containe0 herein, Devebpmem Code regulatbru, and ~)r/u h~ a/ Speceic Plan and Planned Community. 2. Prbr to any use of the projea sale or business actNiry heap commenced thereon, all JJ- Condebns of Approval shoo ba completed ro the aatlsfaGbn of tM Cey Planner. 3. Occupancy ofthelacility shag nolcommenceuntXSUChtune 8a a11Unibrm BUibup Code and ~_/_ State Fire MarshaN's regulatbrfe have been conplled web. Prbr to occtlpartcy, palls shaX be submeted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fre Protecdon DletriG and dre Buildup and Salary Divisbn b show compliance. The Wibup ehaX lt0 inepeGSd for corrgllara:a prbr to occupancy. / / 4. Revised see Plans and buildup ebvatbm incorporaturg aX Condilbrm of Approval shall be JJ_ submhted for City Planner review and approval prbr to iaeuence of buildup pemdis. v' S. Allsea, grading,landscape, urpatbn, andstreetirtprovamere plena oboe be coonlinated br JJ-_ consistency Prior to asuance o1 any pemXts (eudl as gradup, tree removal, emxoactrment, building , etc.j, or prior to final map approval In the case of a astom bt subdNision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes fuel. / 6. Approval of this reµleal shall nd waNe mmpNarce with all sedbne of the DevabpmeM JJ- Cade, aX other applicable CNy Ordutenas, and appecaDN Carmuney Plarm a Specilb Plana in eHacl al the time 01 Buildlrp PomXI iewance. / 7. A detailed on-see IlpAtup p4n shoe ba reviewed and apgeved by the CNy Planner and _JJ- Shenlfs Department (9Bg-8811) prior to the iesuaflce DI lwildkp pernXM. SUUI plan shall indicate style, illumuulion, bcatbn, height, and method of shNldup ao as rat to adversely aHec1 adjacera properties. a. IfrbcenttallzedlrashreceplaGesareProvided,aXVaehpick-up shall be tOruWlvidualunes JJ- weh all receptacles shbidad from pudic view, / 9. Trash receptacb(s) aro required artd shsM meet CNy atanderde. The Hnel deegn, bcatbrq, _J_J- and Me number of trash receplacNS shall W subject to Cey Planner revew ant approval prbr to issuance of driWirq permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenertces such as tranefomMra, AC CdfldeMel6, etc., shall JJ- t>e located out of pudic view and adequatery xroened through the use of a combutatbn of i concrete or masonry walla. bermirp, and/or IarWecapirp to the satbtadbn of the Cey Planner. 5C - 2/91 10( 11 G/~ 2cua so 7~ -O.: ~d<non o.u• 11. Street names shall W Submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. t 2. All Widirg numbers and individual unxs shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating ireil widths, maximum sbpes, physical condAbns, fendrg, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawkgs, shall W suDrtiaed for Cay Planner reviewaM approval priortoapproval andrecordatbnof the Final Tract Mapard prior to approval of street improvemem and grading pWns. Devebper shall upgrade and conshuct all trails. inckWing fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 1 a, The Covenants, Condttbrfs and Reslrlctbns (CCBRs) shah not gohibtt the keeping of equine animalswherezoning nequiremams torthe keepinpof sabanimals have beenmet.IMividual bt owners in subdivisbnts shall have theoptbn of keeping Bald animals wittput the necessity or appealing to boants of directore or homeowners' associatbrro for amendnteras to the CC&Ra. 75. The Covenants. Conditions, and Restrictbns (CC3Ra) and Artictes of Irtcorporatbn of the hbntaowners' Association are subject b the approval of the Planning and Ergineedng Divisions and the City Apomey. They shall be recoNed concurrently with the Fnal Map or prior to the issuance of Wikprg pemxls, whichever ocare first. A recorded copy shall De provided to the City Engineer. J_J- J___/_ JJ- _J_i, _ J_J- 76. Nlpadcways, open areas, and lardscaPkg shag lb pemwnenty makdainad Dytheproperry J_J- owner, tameownens' associatbn, or other meam aoceptaDle to the City. Prooi of this landswpa maintenance shag W sulxttfttntd for Ctty Planner and Cily Erplneer review and approval prbr ro issuance of Wilding perrntts. t 7. Solar access easements shah be dedbaled nor the purpose of aseumkg that each rot or --~---/- dwellirg uns shah have the right to receive sunpgM across adjacartt bts or units br use of a solar energy system. Ths easements may becoMairted in a DeclarMion of Reatrlcl'gns for the subdivisbn whkh alwll be reMNeO olxxxlrrently wiM tIN reoontatbn of the final map or issuance of permits, whicMver comae first. The eassmeras chap prohl'bil the caaDng of shadows q' vegetatbn, shucturee, fbdUre6 or any otMr object, exceq for utiply wires and similar objects, pursuant b Devebprrterd Code Saedon 17.08.080-6-2. 18. The project comairta a dsafgnated Hieloricel Larfdrtterlt. The silo snail be devebped and _/_J. maimaiMd in accortlancs wan the Histmb Landrnedt ANeMbn Pemdt No. . Amy further modpicetrontsto the ells indudwq,bN rollNrdled to, edeMfaperetbrts andlor iMerbr atteratbrrswhbhldlecttlle ederbroltMWiItlI11g60f 9lfgCturea.removal of landmark , trees, demolpbn, rebcatbn, recomtrtctbn of dliWirgs a atmctures, orchanges to the site, shall requiro a modilbatbn t01M HgloriC Landmark Attsralion Penrvl subject to Historic Preservalbn CoRarllsafM feVbW anld approval. C. Bulltling Oeelgn i _ J 1. An attemative energy system B required to provide dbmeatiC hot water for all6wellirg unes ~ _ J~- and for heating arty swinkrtirg pool or spa, unbae o1Mr apemalWa energy systems are dertbntstretedto beat equivahntl capacity an0 edbiency. Nl svkttrrYrg poobinstape0 althe time of inttial daveloprwnl shop W supplemented wph solar heatkg. Details shall W included in the Wib"utq Wane and shall be wOmpted for City Poanrtsr revew and approval prbr to the issuance of W iglrp pemips. 2. All dwellings shall have the IroM, side and rear elevatbna upgraded w8h architectural .J _._J Ireatmem, detailirp and ironease0 delineation of sUdace troetntenl sugect to Ciry Planner review and approval prbr to issuance of Wilding permtta. ', sc . si91 a ohs 210 G~ eA d.. ~~~ ~ %J ~G6 C eem Dam 3. Standard patb must plans for use by iDa Homeowners' Associatbn siiaA De submined for City PWnner and Building Cryicial review and approval prior to issuance! briWing permits. 4. All roof appunerances, iridudinp air mnctnioners and other roof mourned ew,~mem and/or projeabns, shall De shieMedfrom view and the smrM bNlered from adjacea properties arM streets as re~tirod Dy the PWrmirg Division. Stich screening shall ba archhechlragy imegrated with the dliltlirg design and mrfstructed to the sansladbn a the Cpy Planner. Details shall ba inducted in Wibirg plans. D. Panting and VMICUWr Acpaa (Indkate deUlh M bulMlnq plan!) / t. All parking bt Wndscapa idands snail tiaveamirliRlUmadaida dimerreiona 6lBet and shall corzain a f 2-inch wak adjacea to the parking sWM (irckrdirp alrb). 2. Textufed pedeslrlan palhwayS end roxNfed pavomarM across ckcuWtbn !false shall he usel. / 3. All parking spaces Shah 6e double Sniped per CNy standards arld aA driveway aisles, earances, and exits shall be striped per city standards. 4. All units shall be provided vrilh garage door openero N dMeways are lass than 1819ei kr depln Irom beds of sbewant. 5. TheCovenaas,COMNkxroaM Restrldbns shah restddMeatorapearecreatbnal vehicles on this site unbss they aro the prkicipal source d trolfaportatbn ra ate owner and prohbN parking on imsrbr ckmWtion aisles after than in desiprtated vbNor perkkp arose. / 6. Plafre for arty sacurey 9>Mea shah be subniNted Ion IfM CNy PWnnet, City ErgMiser, and Rancho Curamorga Fire Protection Dletrbt review and appnovelprbrro lawancea Ouildirg permas. E. I..andacapinq (lot publicly malmalned IarWeeape area, rotor W 9etxlon N.) ~ t. Adetailed larxlscape and irripatbn pWn,irtckdkg sbPe pWrprg and modal horns IaiWacap- Inq in tfb case a reatdemlal devebptrfsrM, ahaA W prepared by a ncenesd IardsCepe archNsaand subnsdadbr CNy Planner rovlewardapproval prbrro Ihsieeuancea wiWkg pertnAS or prbr final msp approval in the rase d a atatom Ia etibdMisbn, 2. 6iatirg troes rowirod to W preeervs0 N place shah bs paedadweh aoamtnialon Dentist in aomrdenawiMifis klurtidpalCode Ssdbn tg.08.t to, aM wrblW ontMgadrq para. The kxatbn d those tree robe preserved In pace aM new localbrq rortranapaaed uses Shan be mown ontM dstaibdlarrdecape plats. The appNcaro ettaNloNOw !Maths anDOrbt's remmmerxielbro rogardrg prosarvatbn, tronsplantkp and tmm~irfg rrletltoda. 3. Aminimuma_treeepxgrosaacre,mmprieeddlnelolbwingaizae,snaNDeprovided within the project: %- 4a-inch box or larger, %- 36 inch Dox or Wryer, _ % • 24-inch box or Wrger, ^ Y. - 15galbn, and ~ % - 5 gaNOn. ,_-~_ 4. A minimum a %~ %ol Yeas yaroed wNltin Ina project shah ba apedmen a¢a bees 24-inch boz a Wryer. 5. WNhin parking bW, trees shall W paned at !rata a aro t5-gNbn Tres for every thref parking stalls, sullbierN to shade SOY. a the pafltirg aroa al solar noon on August 21. _/J- JJ- J___/~ J~- J ~_ J-J_ J-J_ ~J_- J_._J_ J~- ~~- _J____/- _1_J- sc-anal ions 211 ~..o ~ os ~ 6. Trees shall be plantedinareas olpudb view adjacemtoantl abng structures atarate of one Samdeam D.,.. tree per 30 linear leaf of W iklirg. _.J~_ 7. Ap privare slope berets Sleetorless bvertical height and of 5:l orgroarersbpe, but less than J~ 2:1 sbpe, shah be, al minimum, irrigated and IarWscaped with appopdate ground cover for - erosion control. Sbpe plaming required by this section shall lncludeapemaneM irrigation system to be installed by the devebper prior b amrpanq. 8. Allpnvaresbpes in excessd5leet, Dut bssihanB teat in venial height ando12:1 orgreater J_J- sbpeshaNDeWMscapedarMirrigatetlloreroaionCOntrolandtosoryenttrevappearanceas rolbws: one 15-galbn or larger size tree per each t 50 xl. h. of slope area, 1-galbn or Wrger sizestaubpereach100sq.ry.ofsbpearea,andapproprlazegroumcover.Inaddtlbn,sbpe banks b excess or B teal in vertical hegM and d 2:1 orgrearer sbpe shall also irrctude one 5-galbn or larger size Tree per each 250 sq. fl. d slope area. Trees and shrubs shalt be plamed in staggered clusters b soryen and vary sbpe plane. Sbpe planikg requked by mis sectbn srraN include a pennanere irrigariwt system b De rnatatled by the devebper prior b oaupancy. 9. For sirgk tamity reaitlential OevebPmeM, aN sbpa plaraMg and irrfgdbn shatl be contirxr- JJ_ dusty maintained m a heatlhyand mmargcondNbn bythe devekgeruMNeach indvidual unX is sold and oxupie0 bytM buYSr. Pnorto robaairg ooaparwyforihoaeunMS, an napecibn shah Da conducted M lM Plarminp Divison to dstemane that they aro in satisfactory conditbn. 10. For muNflamily residential and non-residential dsvebpmerR, propMy owners are reapon- _J.-/_ siNe for the cominual maintenance d aN landscaped areas on-sXe, ea weN as coMigtwu5 plamed areas wehin the pudic dgMol-way. AX lariderlapstl afe86 ahaN Do kept tree from weeds and debris and maintaXled in a heaNhy and IMHip oonditlon, and efWl receive regular pruning, lertdizirg, rtpwirip, and IMwNrq, Any dama{pd, dead, dbes6ed, or decaying plant material shaA be replaced wNhin 30 days from tM date d damage. 11. Front Yard lardacapklg shah Ds required per tM Devsbpnlent Cods arM /or JJ- . TMa requirorriant sfwM be in addlbn to the required street trees arW sops planting. / 12. Tne linal desgn of the perimeter parkways, waNs, larrdscapirg, slid sidewalks shall be J / included in the requiro0lartdecape pWra and ehaY be WbjaG to CNy PWetsr review and _ _ approval andcooMNtaled broortsbtency wNtwrry padtway IaMecapkg pknwhlch maybe required by tM Engmaarkg Division. 13. Special landscape leaturee each es mwndkg, epaulet lock, apectltrert ells trees, meander- _IJ_ ing sidewaks (w~horizonhl Chafgq, and NaeneNMd landsaping, N nquked abng ATE -J K / ,a.l.arWSCapirg artd lrtfgatbn systems roquirodto be irgWNd wNhIn1M ay on ~ J._/_ file pedmetar d title Prol«x aroa anaX De mMkarousy makdalrted by 4 M ds~ebper. 15. All walk sheX be provided wtlh deCOraNve lroakrtent.Nbcated MpubNC rttaimenanceareas. JJ the dasgn ahaN De coordinated wNh the Ergirtesdrg Oivisbn. _ _ 16. Tree makllellarlG cMSrla ehaN bs devabped and etldlWlsd br CXy PWlrrer review and J~_ approval prior b iseuantce d OuNdkg pamkM. These crlteda s1taN ertoouregs the natural growth Ctsrageristics of Ms eeleged tree tlpeciee. t 7, LarlOSDapilg and irrigelbn shaX (M designed to cdnaerve water through tIM principles of J~_ Xerisrr;ape as dslined m Chapter 19.18 d the Randb Cucamonga Munkdpal Cade. sc z/91 e,r is 212 F. Signs ~1. Thesigns indicatedonthe wbmitledpbnsareconceplualontyand ratapartol this approval. Arty sgns proposetl for This devebpmeM shall corryty wNh me Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Plannirxa Division priorto installatbn of any signs. 2. AUnaonn Sign Pnx,7ramforthls devebpmeMShall be wdnMedfor CNy Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building pertnNs. 3. Directory nanumeM sign(s) shalt be provided for apartmem, condominium, or townfames prbr to occupancy and shall require separate applicaton aM approval by the Planning Division prior to iswance of Wiklirg pennNs. G. Environmental 1. TTedevebper shall provide each prospective payer wrMBn ratba of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard tonnat as determined by Ne City Pbnner, prbr to accepting a cash deposN on arty ProPertY. 2. The devebper shalt provide each prospective buyer written ratite of fhB City Adopted Special SNdies Zone for the Red Hiq FauN, in a standaM format as dMennined by the City Planner, poor to acceping a cash depoaN on arty property. 3. The devebper shah provide each prospepive buyer written notice of the FoothiN Freeway project in a standard format as determkied by the City Pbrxtar, poor to atxieptkp a cash deposit on arty property. 4. A final acoustical repon anal) be subrnNled br CNy Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of buiding permits. The linal report stall diecxtse thB bust of imerbr raise attenuatbntobekrvlS CNEl, the Wildirip matertaleand constnatbntechnques povided, and N appropriate, verity the atlequaq of the mNipalbn measures. The buNdinp pans will be checked for coMOrmarae with the mtpation meawrea coMaNted kt the final report. H. Other Agencfp t. Emergerfuy secorxlary access ShaNbe providedin aoWrdancewNh Ranch Ctcamonga Fire Protecton Distriq Standards. 2. Entergerxy access shall be provided, maNaenencefres andcbar,a mWmumof 261eet wide al all times durkp corgtmgbn in aocordancs wdh RarrJa Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. 5. 3. Prior to issuance of builtletp pemNb for mrrbuatlbb oatslrixAbn, evidence shalt be submitted to the Rartclto Cucamonga Flre Prolerdbn Oblrlq that temporary water auppty for fire protegbn b avaNabb, perWNtg conlpbtbn al required Ilrs praedbn system. 4. The applkaM Shah comact tM U. S. Postal Service b detsmllne the appraplate type and bcation of mail boxes. MuNFlamiiy residergial dsvabpmeMa shell provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes wNh adequate IlgMktg. The Hnal bcatbn d Ifw maN boxes and t~s despn W tM overhead stnaNre shah be sugeu to CNy PWraer review and approval prior to the iswance of huiblrq pertnNe. ,~ a.~,~.~o ~ ~~s --a o... J-/- J~- ~~- J~_ ~-J_ JJ- _J- /_ J-/_ J~_ J-l_ J-1- For projects using seplb tank facllNbs, written ceANbatbn of aaeptabtlNy, ifaludifp all supportive inlormatbn, shah be odained from tIW San Sernardira Cdumy Departmem of , Emironmemal Health and submMed to the Buildirq Oflbial prior b IM issuance of Septic '~ Tank Permss, arW prbr to iswarca of building pertrtiU. -J-~--- sc ~ sie I e or I z 213 ~x ~,~,~, ~o ,'sos APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFEfV DIVISION, (714) 989.7863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. She Devebprnem ~ t. The applicam gMll oonply wahiM latest adopted Uniform SUildirg COde,Unsorm Mechani- JJ_ cal Code, Uniorm Pbmbirg Coda, Nalbnal EleGrb Code, erW aA other applMabb Codes, ordinances, and regulatbrrs in enact at tM time of issuance of relative pemrls. Please comae the building and Solely DNfsion for copies a tM Cade Adoptbn Ordinance an0 applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of buibkq permits for a new resldemlal dweNNq urrN(s) a major addsbn J~- toexisting unit(s), a,e applicant shaNpeydevelopnenifaes m tM eatabNahed rate. Such fees may inckMe, but are rot limsedto: City Beautlncatbn Fee, Park Fee, Droinapa Fee, Systems Devebpmem Fee, Pennil and Plan Chtldtklp Fees, and School Fee6. `~ 3 Prior to issuance of btrildkq perm6s la a now corrarlerciel a irdustrlal devebprnem or J_/_ aotdihon to an existirq devebpmera, iM appNCaro sheA pay devebpllMM lees at the establisfted rate. Such fees may include, IXd are not IkNted to: Syaems Oevebpment Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, PemtN and IMan Cheddrq Foes. 4. Street addressessMllbe provided bytM busdkq CBldal, aNertracVparcel map remNatbn J_/_ and prbrto issuance a buiklirg permsa. J. Ealetinp Slructurp 1. Provide conPGance with tM Un9orm lsuNdlnp Coda for 9re property Ilea cbararx:es J___/_ considering use, area, arld tiro-renieliveneae of exietMq Wfldkps. 2. Existing buibinp6 sMU Ca made to Comply wNft oorrsd buildkq and zoning ropulatbrls for J~- tM imerWed use or tM blril0lrlp sffeN ba demolletred. 3. Existirp sewage diapoaal ladabe shah De rortoveq toed ardor capital to wmply with the JJ_ Uniorm Plumbktg Coda and UnNOmt Buildkrp Code. a. Underground orralle udaies aro to its bcalad and shown 0n buildrtg plena suWtrilted for J~_ iwildirlp pemMl alpp9catbn. K. Grsdlnp ~ 7. Grading of tM subjsq pr0pMy afwN ha Mt accordance weh 8n UnNOmt Buildup Cade, City -~---~- Grodirq StaMerck, and accepted pradkq proctioee. The Ikwl Padktg plan shall ba in subataraial coreorrftsnro wNh iM appovad Wadktp plan. 2. A soils report shah ba prepared by a QUaAfied engkMer Iicertsetl Dy lM Stale a CalNOmia to J_/_ perform such work, -Y = 3. The devek)pmero d bated within the soil erosion cbtera Doundarba; a SON Dbturbance JJ_ Permit is repuked. PkauoonlatX San Barrtardklo Count' Department of Apkvkuro M (714) 39 7-21 7 1 10. pemst tppers9on. Documereatbn a arch permit ehaN bs suhltWted totM Csy prior b the issuance a rarph grading pemlN. 4. A geobpical report eMN M prepared by a quatNbd snlyrtssr a peobghl and subrflNted at --~-J- 1Mlime of application for yadrp plan check. / 5. ThelinalgradirppWnashagbecompl~tedandappovedprbrtoissuanceolbuildngpannNa. _J-J- sc.s~9t vats 214 6. As a custombt subdivision, the lolbwrtlg reOUiremem5 shall M met: a. Surety shaX be pOetetl and an agreement executed guarameeim conpleti0n of all on-5Ae I J--~ - tlraindge raGXdea neceaaary IOr dewatphrq all par0els (0 IM aalielauylOn Of lh0 Buibing I arw Salary Division prbrio final map approval and pnorto the uwance of grading perrtuts. b. Appropnale easements br safe tliaposal a drainage water toot ors conducted onto JJ- or over adjacent parl'Ala, ere to be tlalinaalad and raborded to tM satMaaion 01 the Bulking and Safety Division poor to issuance d gradng and buikirg permits. I c.0n-sae drainage irrprovemsms, necessary for dswatarktg and proteclkg tM wOdivxied ~ J~- propsaies, are to M irtataXed pdor to issuanu d EuildNtq pemW for canstmctbn upon '. any parcel That may W wbject to drainage Ibvrs enteretg, Navirtp, ar within a parcel j relative ro which a building perme N reQueetw. , d. Final grading pWna for each pamwl are to W wbrrtilted to are Bulking and Safety DNisbn for approval priorto iswanu of buikkry and pradMq pemits. (This may t>a on an irbromsntal or mrtpoata basieJ e. All sbpe tanks in excess d S leaf kt venieal MpM shall W Aeded weh nat)ve grasses or pL7Med wrtn ground cover loreroaion Mntrol upon cat4Mlkln d Radna «eorns omer apemativs rttetno0 d srosbn control ahaX W oorrONiW b 1MsetWaetbn d tM Bwking Oflbial. In addNbn a permanent krlgpfon system slta8 a provked. TMs repukamant doss not reNaas tM appicarrtldsvebper from compllanp wen t11e sbpe pWrAirq requtremeMS d SeuYbn 17.08.0101 d tM oevebwMra Co W. APPUCANTSHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNISIONr (7t1)88-1867,FOp COaPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDn'IONS: L Dedkatbn end VMlcular AceeY J_I _ J~_ f Rpmsol-waY and saaemema Shah W tlsdww b IM CNy I« at knerbr public streets. , J_J-- communrtytrails, public paseos, pudb IartO~cepe area, stoat uses, and public drainage facaNlss as sftawn on tM plans anN« tetNatM map. lhhrtle eawmerss 1« non-pudic ~i, IacllNin (crass-bl «ainape, lbcal Isedsr trait, alt.) shY W reserved of Shown On tM plans I artd'a tentative map. I 2. Dedication snail he made d tM tpsowirtp riyuof-way on 8r perMnMer streets JJ_ (tnaawred from strM cerderane): '. GO_~G tarN.ton F-DOT-H/LL 17G ya ~~ teal I«t on A/t~ow .0007-E ~ I / i D 1aal reel an M/ G L /,t'srN A/E `pUL c rr iDrrVi~ total fwt on 3. An tnsvocabN 08er d d0dication I« -1001 wil7aroadway /etertNM snaX W made ~ -- _-_ IOr all pMate atreen Or dIWM. 1 NonaMiwgr axeu shaX a tiedkated to tM CXy 1« 1ha lolbwirq slraeta: ~ - .-_ - 5 Recgrocal axes easatt+ents ahaX W ptov10e0 enwnnq axes ro all parcels Dy CC6R s . _ __ or by deeds ant sMX De remnlW ogrtcurnMty wah tM map or prbr to IM Iswanu of burklfl0 pennXS, wMn n0 m~ is mw Ned. sc .zest epr Is 215 6. Pmaletlramageeasementslorcre5s-bt drainage SnallDeprovbeo and 5nalitE Ce'~nea:eC ~~~'-` or rated on the final map. - - - 7 The final map shah ckarty delineate a ' 0-loot minimum building re4nctbn area on the neighoonrq bt adpinlnq tM zero lot line wa!I arb GOMaIn the lotbwrtq language'. 'thus MrsDy dedicate to 7M City of Rancho Cucamonga Me ngnt to prohiG't fM consrrugion of (rcsident)ap WiWirgs (ar aNMr swctures) wAnin those aroas dasrgnated on rise map as budding restriction aroas.' A mamlenance agreement shall also M granted Irom each bt to ms adjacent bt through the CCBR's. 8. All existing easements yinp wdhin fNUrs rgMS-of-waysMllMquilclaimedor delineated on '~~, --/_%- tM final map. 9. Easements for pudk sidewaks and/or slrNt trees plead outside lM pudk rrgM-0f-way '~, J__J- shall M dedicatsO to Me Cfry wMrever IMY erraoeGl onto pMate property. i 0. AOOAbnal street h9MC1-way shwa f>a dadkaled along right tum 4nsa, to provide a minimum J.-/_ of 7 feat rMawred hom tM faoe d area. M arD agannt fidewaM b used abrq tM rpht tum IaM, a parallel street tree IllairpeMrlCe sasemem shah M providW. 17. Thedsvebper shall makeapoo0failh eRrinb eoQlketM ntFired oR•sae property iraeresta J_J_ necessary ro coristnra Me reouwed publk itrprowmenb, and M twsM stould tea to do so, the dsvebper shah, at leap 120 days prbr k suMnMal d iM Nnal ntap for approval, enter into an agraerMM to zmpNte tM imprwamxaa ptirsriaM b libvemRMM Code Seabn 88e82 at such tihMUtM City acquirestMproputy wilereats required iorlM inpmvameMa. Such agreertleM shall provide for paymNe eN Dte devebper d>w mea irinimo by tM CAy to aoouirstM oR•ssepreperty interests requiedin corxtectbn wAlt Vie wbdivision. Secunry for a ponbn of tMae costs sf WI W in tM form d a cuh depoaM in tM amount given in an appraisal report o6lilrlW by IM devebper, at dwelopefe absl. TTN appraiser ahae have ~I been approved eY IM CAy prior b wnarianeerriaM d d+e appraiaai. M. $trNl Improvemama t All pudk ~rrtpovemaMe (iMaMr preen, drniiege IartilNles, commurrMy trails, fasseos. ii JJ- landacaped anae, Nat atioem on die plarta aridror tenlaaM map attar a tonaruaed to ~, CAy Standards. IMNbr ltrNl im{NDWRNMf atiaY iflClUde, OiR are rte NmrteO b, wrb and qudar. AC pavsmertl, grlve appioacMa. sEawaW, street Ilglae, am steel trees. i 2. A mrrmslm d 2b fbol wWa paverMnt, wMNR a e0 dad wiW dedkaled rigntct•way shaA M ~ JJ- COnatNded ibf aN M/-aaal0ii alrMia, J. Construe tlia toNowktq prarYRMer street IrtpoverMrm MrliWtq, dR na Amnw lo: I JJ_ SiREE7 NAML CURE! OVITLR AC. WMY amL WALIt OPoVE ANrR J1Att1' lJOlRE JI1RiY TItRW Cdaba. TRAIL L11AND OI116R sc val Sena 216 Notes: Ial Median ~stan0 ;ncWtles lanoscap~ng arq vrgation on meter (bl ?avement rBWnftlugbn and ovenays will be delermmed dunrg plan check. (q ll so marxed. sbe- waNt shah M Wmlinear per,$TD 304. (d) N 5o markaq, an in-lieu of COnstNCtion lee Shall Oe prov4ed for this Nsm. /) NExOW DAu/d.a0/ rw i.. it i,v ~! a. Inprovement plans and mnstnlctbn: a. Street improvemem ptarn intbding street tress and strap IgMS, prepare0 by a regis- tered Civil Engirtwr, shah oe suWnNtsd to arM approved lry dte City Engineer. Security sMll be posted artd an agroartrnt axsryl.d to tM satishpbn d tM Ciry Engineer and tM CNy Attorney guaranteeing Complpion of tM pudic artaor private prop improva- ments.prbrtolinalmap approval ortM ieeyanGdbuildbg pennNS. whicMVar ocwrs first. ___/_/- b. Prbr to arty work being pedortned in pupib rlghttl-way, lees shY IN paiO and a .-/J_ constnldbn MrrnN sMll W odainaOlmm ttN CNy ErtgiMefa CAIU in addtbn 10 any o1Mr parrtfts repuusd. c. PaverMnt pnping, markNq, tranb, atrNl nanM dprkq, and NaeroorxMU CDnduN _/J- ahaN Winstalled b tM satipacdon of the City EnQNNeI. d. SignaloonouN wNh pullboees anaawirrpaNedon arryrMwoontlnaxlon«rammiructbn JJ_ d mapr .secondary «ooNed« atrapa whbtt karNfedl with dMr myor, secondary or mNact« Nreps 1« Muro hanb agnW. Pont boxes shoe W plead on DoM aides of tM prset N 3 fep ansidad BCfi, ECP «arryratMrbutbtM appovW DytM Clq Engineer. Notq: J~_- I ()All puNboxes shah W No. B urNge dltlmew epacsieo by 1M CNy Engineer. (2) ConduN shah W 3•Ntolt galvanized NeN with ptrlrope. e. WMN chair ramps fMM W Nutased On a1 four oorrMn d interaactbru pet Ciry -~J- Standards «aa OiregW try iM CNy Ertginesr. f. Exbtirtg CAy roads repuNinq gor4lnKyipn NMI fMMin open b traMb tl aI (Noes whh ': JJ- adegUatedlNOUntdlMtppbrMtttlgian. AttrrNltdoaun perms msyW taguNSd. Apsh I~ depoea aMI W P~'iOed b cover dM cap d grtlrq and pwirtp, wNett ahaN W ; rNurtdeo upon cortpNtbn of IM cotWtta'abn to tlM atlwaabn d dM CNy ErtgNMp. g. CortcentrtlsdOralrMp.lbwsshatnilCronaidawalM, UnderaWSwakdrains shill M J~_ IrtNaaad M CMy Slartlrds, eaaq br sNtgls IarrMy bfa. n. I•lantllpp aowa ramp design shoe W as apsdas0 by IM CIy ErtpNMp. 'l. JJ- i. streelnrrMfsMlatOproved bytM City PlarrMrprbrto stAnkllall«tkst plancMdc. I JJ~ _5. Street Improvement p4ro par CIy Starrdardsl«a1 prNtla NfNbaltalaprovtda0 br ~~ J~'- revMw ono Itpprpvtl by tM CNy EngNMar. Prbr ro any work MNp pedafrMtl on the pn• vat. ftreeq, fees seal M psitl and mrwnxtbn peryrWa anall Oa oeuirted horn tM city '~. Ertgmeers oniu In addition to any otlMr permNS nguiretl. '~ 6, Strgt trNS, i mNkrrum d t59alton st:e «larger, sIMI W nMaMW par City Standards in -i- __ accordartu wNh IM Cdys steel (roe pogrom. sc arel wane 217 7. IMBrsectpn line of Slte tlesgns shall oe reviewetl by the CAy Engineer for conlormaP~ce r 1^ ~"~~~~ adopted policy. a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sgM shall be ported for all protect imersedions. -~-- incWdinq dmeways. Walls, sgns. and sbpes snarl be iccated cutsba the lines of sgM, LaMSCapinq and other obstructions wMm the lines of sight snarl M approved by the Ctly ~I Engineer. b. Local residamial street imersectbns alull have 1Mir rgtbeabiley improved, uwally by ~ J-r_ moving the2+/-cbsest streattreesoneach side awaylromtMSlreetarW placed inastreet ~ tree easernem. e. A pemM shall DB obtained Irom CALTRANS for arty work wanin tM tolbwing rgMol-way ', J~r- 9. All public imprpvemeMa on tM lolklwirq streets sMa W operatbnally complete prior to the I --~-~~- iswance of bulbirg permits: N. Footle aYlMananq Atha IIIII t A separate set of lantlscape and ingatbn plats{ par t:npktaadrq Pubac Worlcs Standards I J-J- snall be submeted to its Cily ErgiMer qr review and approval pAOr to Ilnal map approval or issuance or Wilding permas, wniclwvar scars fkst. TM baowiriq brtdscape paAlways, medians, paseos, easemems, (taro, or OtMf area! aze reVUirW t0 M anrtase0 im0 the Landscape Malmsnance DMrkY: 2. Asgned concern and waivarlortn to pin anNOrlortntM appropriab landsrapsaM Lighting ~', JJ- DlstrqtsaMllbe lilsdwitn iMCay ErtpirNar priorto lktal map approvalor issuanceOl bulldinq permits wMthever occurs lust. Fomratfon posb shah a OOrM by IM dwebpar. J. All required public brtdlapinp artd inipatbn syuanb ehallWgorainuously mainbiMdDythe ~I JJ- developer omit acoeped by me city. a Parkway landscaping on tM fdbwinp atraet(a) shah eoraortn b M• rasuas of its raspeaive J._/_ 6aautilicatgn Master Ran: 0. Onlltaga and Flood COrgr01 1, The ProNOI (a ponbM ItMra01) ii Ipeatad wahin a Flood Hazard ZOM: tMraton. Ibod ! ~~~- protection maaauras ahY W prordad as urtelrq Dy a rageland Ckil Erginaar and ~. ap{11DVaQ Oy tM Clly EnglMar. 2. It shall ba tM davebpKe naponai0ilNy to nova dN artanl FIRM IAN ! J-,~ desgnatgn ramovad from its projM area. TM davabpKa NtpI1MM shall gapara all necessary rnpona, pars, and Itydrobgr/hybwgc ukvWbro. A CortdNbnal UMr ~. of Map Rsvlsgn (CLOMR) shah W obtainW from FEMA prbr b iNbl mp approval or ~ssuartca of blildirtq parmita, whicMvar Doors first. A lMat W Map Ravbron (CONK) shah be Issues by FEMA prgr to occupanry or irtprowlMrtl alxaplanca, wnictwvar occurs first V 3 A linal dralnaga study shall W submntad b am approved py IM City Englfla•r prbr to linal __ map approval or tM Issuance of bwginq parrots, whlcMvar ocars lust. All Oramage Iacdrtles snap W Installed as rerNUed by tee Cry Erglrtaar. SC 7/91 Ilor la 218 a, A pemW from me County Fbod Comrol Oistnct is regwred tar work wNNn rts rghPOf-way v 5. Tree! are pronibeed wknin 5 lest of the outsge Oiamela; or any puDAC storm dram. pipe ' J / RlOawred from !ne outer edge of a mature Ifee tNnk. 1 -~-~ - / e. Public Storm tlreln eaeeRMlms sMN De graded t0 convey ovedbws in IM event of a -J-~- Dbdcapa in a wmp Caton Darin on the puNb street. P. Ut11nNe t, Provge separate utility servbes to earn Wrcef inWdkq sankary sewerage system, water, I _l_J-. gas, eleCric power, telephone, and dame N (aN undsrp0urq) b sacordana wkn Iha Utility StargarOS. Easemems sMN De provided as required. 2. Tree devebper snaN be responsibN ror tM rebcatbn of sxistinp UtIN1ieS as necessary. _.J_J_ 3.Water and sewer plarq sMN M desigMd and aonatrtrdted b meN tlt• rpuinmema of tree J_J_ Cucamorpa County Wmr Diatrkt (CCW01. Rancfb Cueangrtga Fin ProleGbn District, and IM Environmental Meakn Dspanmant of tM CaurNy a San 9ernudlrb. A otter M compliance from tM CC WD U required prbr to IMaI map approval a iaayaflCe d psrmks, wngfMVSr oa;un first. O. GertMal RequuerMner and Approval t. The repents parcels contaiMd wknin tM project boundarMs enaN W wguN axroined inro I ~-~- one Pfrul prbr to iaeuartu of ouildkig parmks. 2. M easement for a pim use dnwway anall De pmvb W prbr b ikW map approval or I -~-1- iswanu W anMing pemHa, whicrtever Odpaa find, la: 3. Prior to approval 01 IM fin71 map a deposk sMk W Doaptl wkh me City cOVennp Me I /_.__/- estimatwmat of apponbrartg tM apewnana uMar rUagartMnt Oiatrtct anbrtg tM newly pNted paroetf. a. EtNrarxlalSan SevaNte Ma RepbMl MaiMNe, Seoorttlary Regional, arq Mager Plan _i-l_ Drainage fees anent a paid prig to rkW map approval a prbr 10 Ouadirtg pemat issuance d tb map is invONed. 5. Psrmks sMk De abta+tM from iM blOerMtg agancNs for wak wkhkt lief rlpM-d-waY: _/...J_ G/7~ 6 A SpMd osrtaara and waNar lam t0loin ardra form pM Law EnbroamaM Colilnlgnky J_/_. Faaldiea DMtrIQ shall oa Mad wkh iM Cky Ertprteer prior to final map approval a tM dwarice W Alkding pemaq, whiCMvM oavre fMat. FamtNion aaw anal ba bonM M IM Oevsbper. 7 Prbr to finakiatbn d any d1vNNpnNnt phase, stAfltlera irrtprovamartt plarn shall Da coin- /_J. plated DeyOM tM pf We Dountlarias to aalun sagondary aogat ant OniMpa pmtMion to tM satrsfaabn of tM Cky Eftpinaar. PMN bourtdarMa anal otMrtlpatd b bt kMb shown on Ins approval tenUtNa map. sc.v9l l4nrlII 219 ~...-r- ~c~..c - cZ- ~,c~d<G~ u.eu~-,z LOS LGP~iC RESOLUTION NO. y~~0~//- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI FORMA, DENYING AN APPEAL AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 93-05, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A GOLF TRAINING FACILITY, CONSISTING OF A DAIVI NG RANGE, PUTTING GREEN, CHIPPI HG AREA, CLUBHOUSE, AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA P) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF MILL IREN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-011-24 A. Recitals. (i) K 6 K Golf inq has filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. 93-05 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in thin Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the apolication." (ii) On the 10th day of March 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and approved the application subject to the conditions listed in their Resolution No. 93-21. (iii) The applicant filed an appeal on the application, pertaining to a condition of approval requiring installation of a Master Plan Storm Drain Line, within the time limits prescribed by law. (iv7 On Che 21st day of April 1993, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meet±nq on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (v) All legal prerequisites pr for to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8• Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically Linde that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Aeso lotion are true and correct. 2. Based upon subs tent sal evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced meeting on April 21, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, this council hereby specs Eicelly finds as Ee llowa: a. The application applies to property located between Feothtll Boulevard and Arrow Route flt Milliken Avenue with street frontages of 2,560 feet along Foothill Boulevard and 2,170 feet along Arrow Route, and is presently improved with detention ba sine, and the balance of the sire :s va cants and , lrlrV CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. DR 93-OS - K S R GOLFING April 21, 1993 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated for commercial uses and is developed with a detention basin, the property to the south is designated for industrial uses and is vacant, and the propezt iea to the east and west are designated for industrial uses and contain a sports complex/animal shelter and a manufacturing building, respectively; and c. The development of the golf training facility is consistent With the General Industrial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Industrial de~l9nation of the Generai Plan; and d. The application, together alth the attached conditions of approval, will comply with all applicable standards of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-Yeferenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facto set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project le consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed use Ss in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purpeees of the distrlet in which the Bite is located; and c. That the proposed use 18 in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to propertie9 or improvements in the Vicinity. 4. Thla Council hereby fin d9 and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, Eurther, a Negative Declaration was adopted on March 10, 1993. 5. Based upon the finds nqs and conc lusiona set forth in paragraphs i, 2, 3, and d above, this Council hereby approves the applicatior, subject to each and every condition set Eorth in Planning COmmt sa ton Reeo lotion No. 93-2 1 . 6. Th Le Council hereby provides notice to R 6 R Golf'_ng that the time within which judicial review of the decision repreeenied by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 109d.6. ~1 CITY COONCIL R£SOLUTI ON NO. DR 93-OS - R & K GOLFING April 27, 1993 Page 3 7. The City Clerk of the City of Poncho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this P.esolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to R 6 x Golfing at the address identified in City records. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. !tom ~ ~r~..:..s_ ~ i ~ ~f~ ~. RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNC SL OF THE CITY OF PAN CHO CUCAMONGA, CALZ FORM A, UPHOLDING AN AYP EAL AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 93-05, A REQUEST TO CONATRUCT A GOLF TRAINING FACILITY, CONSISTING OF A DRIVING PANGE, PUTTING GREEN, CHIPPING AREA, CLUBHOUSE, AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRI CP (SUBAREA H) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS ZN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 229-011-20 A. Recitals. (i) K 6 K Golfing has Filed an app ii cation for the approval of Development Rs view No. 93-OS as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." (ii) On the 10th day of March 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and approved the application subject to the conditions listed in their Resolution No. 93-21. (iii) The applicant filed an appeal on the application, pertaining to a condition of approval requiring installation of a Master Plan Storm Drain Line, within the, time limits prescribed by law. (iv) On the 21st day of Apzil 1993, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting cn that date. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set. forth in [he Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution ace true and correct. 2. Hosed upon substantial evidence presented to this Council du n ny the abo•,e-referenced meeting nn April 21, 1993, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby spec if icalLy finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located hetween Fonr_!•,i 11 Houl=yard and Arrow Route at Milliken Avenue with street Econta qes of 2,550 feet along Foothill Boulevard and 2,170 feet along Arrow Route, and :s presently improved with detention basins, and the balance of the site „ Vacant; and CITY COVNC IL RESOLUTION NO- CR 93-OS - K & K GOLFING April 21, 1993 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated for coamtercial uses and is developed with a detention basin, the property to the south is designated for industrial uses and is vacant, and the properties to the east and west are designated Eoz industrial uses and contain a sports complex/animal shelter and a manuf actuzing building, respectively; and c. The development of the golf training facility is consistent with the General Industrial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Industrial designation of the General Plan; and d. The application, together with the attached conditions of approval, will comply with all app lica6le standards of the Industrial Azea Specific Plan and the Development Code• 3. Based upon the Substantial evidence presented to this Council Suring the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions app licab ie thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the Project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, a Negative Declaration wag adopted on March 10, 1993. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, an3 6 above, this Council hereby approve9 the application subject [o each and every condition set forth in Planning Commission Resolution No. 93-21r aith a modification to Engineering Division Condition No. 2 to read as follows: "2. Provide a drainage study for the reconstruction of the existing detention basin. Reconstruction of avid basin shall be to the satlataction of khe City Engineer. My terming and spillwey fac111ties shell also be reviewed by the City Planner Eor landscape amenities." CITY COUNCIL PESOLUT ION NO. DR 93-05 - K 6 K GOLFING April 21, 1993 Page 3 6. This Covrcil hereby provides notice to K s K Golfing that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 109G.5. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (h) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt reques^_e d, to K s K Golfing at the address identified in City records. R. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ------ CITX OF RANCHO CIiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Gam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO AMEND CHAPTER 3.08 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODs TO ALLON DISCP,ETIONA RY APPROVAL BY APPLICANTS RECOMMENDATION Tbat the City Council hold first reading of the ordinance modification to Chapter 3.08 of the Ra noho Cucamonga Municipal Code to allow an applicant to have disrretionary approval in professional services agreements. BACKGflOUND/ANALYSIS The Furcha sing Ordinance allows purchases without bidding for supplies, services, equipment, and the sale of personal property in certain specific instances. In keeping with present standards staff recommends that where the City is to be reimbursed by an applicant For a consultant's services such as an EIR, the applicant, in noncert with the department, be given a choioe from an established listing. There is no cost to the City since the applicant is paying for the consultant. Departments have in the past through various service procurements established a listing of qualified professlona is in a variety of fields. This process will not preclude departments from following established purchasing guidelines where City funds and not reimbursed tl~nds are involved. Aespec tfully gub;mittetl, ~ ~^~~ ~' , ~ '~,1~ ~ ~ , P,obert t. ~dmir~ue~z ' Administrative Se~v is es Director AO:jak/J OADINANCE N0. ~~~ AN OADINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AMENDi NG 3ECTi0N 3.08.090 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY AD-ING A NEW SUBSECTION 3.08.090(G) PERTAINING TO DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL BY AN APPLICANT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OE AANCHU CUCAMONGA DOES HEBEBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 7: SECTION 3.08.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Mu.^.ic ipal Code is hereby amended to add a new Subsection 3.08.090(G), to be read, in uo rds and Figures, as tollcus: "G. IF a professional services agreement is involved as to uh ich the City is to be reimbursed by an applicant for discretionary approval." SECTION 2: The City Council declares that should any provia ions, section, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared inva l.id by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any pre-emp tive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in .`u1J. force and effect regardless of such court action er legislation. SBCIION 3: The City Clerk shall certify to Lhe adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be puD li shed within fifteen (15) days a tter i.ts passage at least once in the Inland Valley Da ilv Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation pub lshed in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City oC flancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED thin day o£ ----. 1993. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSL•'NT: COUNCIL MF,MBERS ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS hf) Uf1'T VP'HANUHV VUUAMVN VA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 TO Mayor and Mcmbcrs of the City Council FROM: Day Labor Subcommittee BY: Duane A. Bakeq Assistant to the City Manager SlT6]ECT: Dav I,ahnrer Inh Center Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Day Labor Subcommittee that the City begin, as a pilot program, a job center as suggested by the Day Labor Task Force. It is proposed That this center be located at the northeast comer of 8th Street and Grove Avenue and be fundeJ from Community Development Block Grant Funds. Rackground: For the past (our years, the issue of day laborers has become an increasing problem in ~hc City. The area of town along Arrow Route from Vineyard to Grove has traditionally' been associated as a place where individuals could get day work. This tradition is tied to the agricultural heritage of the community and the existence of the Citrus Growers Association Labor Camp on Arrow Route. Although the Labor Camp is now nothing more than an empty field, the association of this area as a place to get day work still remains. As the City has grown so has the area surrounding the old Labor Camp. More and more residential and business uses are developing in the southwest area of the City and the Jay laborers arc coming into confict with the new developmem. The City has received complaints of laborers harassing women, blocking driveways, blocking store entrances, being drunk in public, urinating in public, and blocking traffic. Looking for work on the street is inappropriate and this use will continue to conflict with the residential and business uses in the area as the day laborers have no real alternative. The situation along Arrow Route is also experienced by the cities of Upland and Ontario. The problems in Ontario arc similar to ours but the location of their problem is along Holt Boulevard and is not immediately adjacent to our City. The problems experienced by Upland are immediately adjacent to Rancho Cucamonga. The major day labor problem for Upland occurs on the northwest comer of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue across the street from one of the gathering points in Rancho Cucamonga. Because this problem exists in our neighboring cities, the Task Force invited represenatives from these two cities to participate. Omario and Upland both scot representatives to some of our Task Force meetings. While Upland r)c] Day Laborer Job Center April 21, 1993 Page 2 participated in the Task Force, they did not agree with the initial recommendation of using the Old City Yard as a possible site for a job center as this site is within their city and adjacent to a residemial neighborhood. An alternate site was :*plored and [he nonheasi corner of R[h Street and grove Avenue was settled on. Although Upland had no objections to this alternate site, some resident in Ontario have expressed strong concerns regarding this location. Bctorc making its recommendation, the Task Force considered a great deal of information and had lengthy discussions of [hc subject Presented below for your information is the reasoning behind the Day Labor Task Force recommendation, a description of how a job center operates, and a list of major issues that had to be addressed before the recommendation was made. Reasoning Rehind Recommendation Beginning in February 1991 a Task Force established by the City Council began meeting to discuss alternatives and solutions to !hc day laborer issue, The Task Force was made up of Councilmembcrs Alexander, Wright and later Councilmember Gulierrex; Public Safety Commissioners Amodt West and later Glass; and local residents and business persons. Alter a year of deliberations which included staff research of job centers in other cities, meetings with the day laborers and their advocates, and lengthy discussions about the situation among the Task Force members, a decision was made to recommend to the City Council the establishment of a job center. This recommendation was hascd on the realization that problems associated with day laborers could not be solved by law enforcement. The day laborers in Rancho Cucamonga consist of documented and undocumented workers. Thcsc groups arc predominantly male and represent a wide spectrum of ages. The impacts they cause al Inc mtrrenl solicitation sires are generally due to the selection of nn inappropn~le site and the absence of facilities and supervision. It was the feeling of the Task Force that the best way to deal with the issue was to create a situation where there was some control over where and how day laborers waited for work. The job center seemed the best alternative based on the experiences of other communities. Finally, (hc site al Rth Slrccl and Gmve Avenue was selected because it appeared to be the most cost effective ahernative shat was acceptable to our Task Force and the City of Upland. Other properties were examined but most property owners were nn( willing to lease their properly or were not willing to allow our proposed use on the properly. Finally, the propenics that we did review had to he relatively close to the areas where the day laborers are now congregating to make efforts ro gel them to the job center easier. It. What is a Job Center A iob center works as follows, persons seeking employment would arrive at the center and register their skills, if any, and be assigned a number. Employers who come to the center may select either an individual that they have worked with befm'c or the laborers whose numbers arc drawn by lottery. Also, GW Day Laborer ]ob Center April 21, 1993 Page 3 employers may request workers with specific skills in which case a lottery is head among those workers with those skills only. Additionally, the job center will actively recruit employers to use the center and will market the canter to the business community. Other services needed by workers will be handled by referral ro other agencies, in accordance with the goals of the Task Force. Finally, volunteers and other agencies will be invited to the center to provide inform anon and training to the laborers while they wait for work. This information and training could 6e on English as a second language (ESL), public health, and workers rights just to name a few. Also, while there is a captive audience at the job center, the opponunity could be taken to culturally assimilate the day laborers. This task is very important as a lot of the problems currently associated with day laborers have to do with cultural differences such as the treatment of women and public sanitation. Considering the clientele and services provided, a job center would not have to be open all day. Realistic hours far a lob center could be Monday through Sawrday from G:00 am to 11:00 am or 12:00 noon. Beyond 12:00 noon, employers arc usually not looking for day laborers. As currentl}' envisioned, the center would be staffed with at Icast two people, To provide a certain level of accountability and control, it is being recommended that one of the staff be a paid part-time employee with the remaining staff support being provided 6y volunteers. Cencral oversight of this program would ultimately be handled through the Community Services Department. The Community Services Department is the logical choice for the Icad department on this project because of their current responsibilities in the area of social and community services. Once a progran was established, a network of relationships would make it a valuable asset to the individuals that used the center. These relationships would exist between the City, state, county, volunteers, non-profits, churches, and other providers such as free clinics. In this scenario, the City would be the nucleus of an extended organization that could be accessed by the laborers to improve their living conditions and thereby improve the community by making better citizens. The City of 6rea and Orange both have a site review committee to work with their job centers. The purpose of these committees is to make sure that the job center is meeting the needs (or which it was established while at the same time not creating any new problems for the community. The review committees arc made up of concerns citizens and local business leaders as well as local service providers and policy makers. Our Task Force, a portion thereof, or the City Council Subcommittee could take on the role of a site review committee should the Cily Council decide that a job center be opened, I I1. Major Issues In arriving at their recommendation the Task Force had to deal with a number of major issues. These issue included who would be served by a job center, legality of operating a job center, traffic impacts, and the possibility of attracting more laborers to the community. GLI Day Laborer Job Center April 21. 1993 Page 4 The first issue considered was who the clientele for such a center should be. The laborers are a very diverse group. Because iI is the objective of the Task Force to improve the si tualion around where the laborers arc currently waiting (or work, it would be cuunterproductivc to try to exclude anyone from those beine assisted by the center. If any grouo or person is excluded from the center, that group will continue to look for work at the current locations and current problems would persist. Additionally, ii individuals continue to get work outside of a job center, it would create a competitive situation that would lure some people away from the job center and undermine the ef(ectivencss of the program. It was felt that i(a job censer were established, it would provide the most benefit if it were open to all individuals looking for work. The second major issue that had to be confronted was the legality of operating a job center that assisted those that might be undocwnented workers. Specifically, the Immigration Reform and Control Ac[ oC 1986 made it illegal for anyone to employ any individual not entitled to work in this country. Employers have been given the responsibility under federal law to make sure that individuals they hire are entitled to work in Ihis country by tilling oui a Form I-9. Because the jab center would not actually be employing any of the workers, there is no violation of the law. However, the center would have an obligation to inform all prospective employers of their responsibility for verifying employment eligibility and would also provide all prospective employers with Department of Justice Circular M-274 which instructs employers on how to complete the Form 1-9 and lists their specific responsibilities. In discussing the idea of a jab censer with the Rugional Director of Ihe. Immigration and Naturalization Service, it was confirmed that there was not a Icgal issue wish operating a job center. However, while the INS stated that they do not have a problem with a job center and would spend their en (orcement time raiding employers who hire illegal immigrants, the INS was not willing to offer a guarantee in writing. Although the job centers in Orange County have oat been raided to dale, there is no guarantee that a job center in Rancho Cucamonga would absolutely not be raided by the INS or Border Patrol Although the Cily would not be engaged in any illegal activity, the Border patrol could raid looking for illegal immigrants. If a raid were to occur, the e((ecliveness of the program could fall of( dramatically as laborers would not trust the center and would begin to view it as a place to be rounded up before being arrested. Another issue dealt with was the traffic impacts that might be expected from a job center. A job center would generate approximately 25 to 30 vehicle trips a day. This estimate is based an observations of currcm gathering sites and information fmm other cities operating job centers. The vehicle trips generated by a job center would oat have an adverse impact on traffic on 8th Strccl. A concern raised by the Task Force while investigating this issue is the posstbil ity that a job center would all ract more day laborers to the community. Research imo other communities with job centers has shown that a job center will increase the number of day laborers in a community. Essentially, a job center could act as a magnet and attract laborers who otherwise would not Day Laborer Job Center April 21, 1993 Page 5 come to Rancho Cucamonga from surrounding communities. It is important to note that Rancho Cucamonga is currently serving as a magnet because of the long history of Arrow and the Labor Camp as a site to get work. Residents and business owners from the area have reported that they are aware of laborers coming in busses or vans from as far away as L.A. County and the eastern San Bernardino Valley. Experience in other communities show the increase in day !aborcrs, dcc to [hc attraction of a job center, is cquc! to about 30% to 50% of the original number of laborers in the community. While it is not desirable to attract more laborers, it is inevitable if a jab center is opened. While more laborers will come to the community, they will be coming specifically to use the job center and will not be on tho streets creating the problems associated with day laborers currently. The last major issue deah with in considering a job center was the cost. Since there are no general Lund dollars available (C,r new programs, some other source of funding would have to be identified. The first and most promising source of (ands for operations costs is the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Under the public services section of CDBC a maximum of IS% of the City's annual allocatien can be used (or programs such as the job center. The 93-94 Cily entitlement is 5733,000 thus a maximum of 5109,950 could be allocated (or public service programs. Approximately $29,000 is already being used for public service programs. The City Council earmarked 531,772 in fiscal year 92-93 in a contingency fund for a possible job center. These funds constitute prior year funding and do not effect the total 93-94 CDBG allocation. Also, to qualify for these funds, the Cily must show that at Icast 51% of the people benefiting from the program are considered to be low to moderate income persons, although meeting this rcquiremem would probably not pose a problem. The total operations cost (or this (acility is estimated at approximately 530,000. While CDBG (ands could he used to (and operations. some other source of funds would have tc be identified to (and the small amount of capital costs involved. Onc way of doing this withom a((ecting the general fund would be to sell surplus City land at the corner of 8th and Baker and use a small portion of the proceeds to (mtd the capital costs of the facility. The capital cost associated with upgrading this silt is approximately 520,000. Also, the City of Upland has expressed interest in assisting us with this common problem by contributing some dollars to the capital costs, although this offer has not yet been approved by the entire Upland City Council. It should be need That while the program cost of 550,000 is significant, it is o(tset by the resources currently allocated nn the hundreds of man hours spent by the police in dealing with this problem. This is compounded by the man hours spent by the Upland Police to deal with the same issue. With all of these man hours being spent each year, it is not geging the community any closer to a solmion. Day Laborer Job Center April 21, 1993 Page 6 IV. Conclusion Initiating a new program in tough economic times is a challenge. The protlems that arc being experienced in the areas where day laborers are congregating can't be solved with traditional methods because this is not a problem that can be solved by these methods. Over the past years the city Council and the Public Safety commission have tried to address this situation with a number of approaches. A law enforcement approach was tried with the Police Department being asked to increase patrols in the area, no stopping zones heing installed along Arrow, and the INS and Border Patrol being asked to raid the area. A code enforcement approach was tried with inspections and weed abatement being applied to properties along Arrow where some of the laborers may have been seeking shelter. Another approach tried was publicizing a state run program strictly for day workers. This program was run out of the Employment Development Department in Ontario and was publicized with ^icrs in English and Spanish passed out to the workers and businesses on Arrow. Without much success in these more traditional approaches to the problem, the Task Force focused on a more unorthodox approach in staring a job center. The use of a job center has been used by other communities with some success. Controlling the circumstances surrounding how day laborers congregate and behave in the community through a job center seemed to be the best solution to the difficult and frustrating sitaation that the Task Force reviewed. A job center will not completely solve the problem, however, it can help improve the situation. It is out of this environment of frustration with other methods of dealing with the problem and of promise with a new approach that the Task Force made its suggestion and is why [he Subcommiucc has recommended the establishment of a job center, Respectfully Submitted, I WiII~~Alcxand~/Yn7O Re~ G tierrez Councilmember ~ °U° Coun:,ilmember W1A/RG/DAB;dab ~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 21, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: CITY'8 CONTINBSn PARTTCTPATTON TN BACRGROBND• At the April 7, 1993 City Council meeting, the City Council requested that a discussion of the City's continued participation in both the League of California Cities and the National League of Cities be placed on the agenda for April 21. In light of this request, staff has provided information regarding the current cost of membership, and has provided a summary of the services/benefits derived from participation in both organizations. In addition, the League of California Cities has responded to the Council's concern regarding future participation by writing a letter to the City Council. A copy of the letter is attached. ANALYBIB: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES The current yearly membership fee for the League of California Cities is $10,488.00. The services provided by the League fall into three major categories. They are: lobbying/advocacy, information/networking, and education/training. Among the services provided by the League of California Cities is legislative advocacy on behalf of all California cities. The League is responsible for lobbying legislators on issues that impact local government. There are currently eight standing policy committees which meet four times per year and determine positions on every piece of legislation that affects local government. The League also acts as a provider of information to its membership. For example, access to the League's library includes r ~ information on programs or issues that affect cities. This information is available in written form, on videos and/or cassettes and its use is free of charge to members. Additionally, the League of California Cities distributes the weekly League Bulletin. This publication provides current information regarding pending legislation that impacts cities. The Bulletin is also a mechanism whereby information about issues such as the state budget is disseminated to cities. Information of a critical/timely nature is transmitted via FAX by the League to all member cities. The League also provides networking opportunities for cities through the use of the Library, Citylink Bulletin Boards/E-Mail, meetings, workshops and the annual conference. Cities are kept informed of innovative and cost-saving methods of conducting city business. Training/education is another example of a service provided by the League. The League holds over three dozen workshops a year which address topics of interest on both the state and national levels. The League also provides forums on a regional level which help to address local problems. The annual League conference provides training seminars, in addition to discussion and development of the policies and political platform for cities. The conference is an opportunity for representatives from cities throughout California to meet and discuss mutual concerns, ideas and innovations, as well as vote on policy issues important to cities. We find the services of the League of California Cities invaluable in monitoring legislation and its information services are vital to our operation and are utilized on a daily basis. Representatives from the League have offered to meet with the Council at its request to discuss areas where it might improve its service to cities. NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES The yearly cost of membership in the National League of Cities is $5,909. The National League represents cities from across the country and services provided by the National League are included under two branches - training and lobbying. The National League of Cities Training Institute offers a number of training sessions to elected officials as well as staff. There are two meetings per year which offer both training and networking opportunities. The weekly newsletter provides updates on federal legislation impacting cities. The lobbying effort by the National League is aimed at supporting the National Municipal Policy which is the political platform developed by the member cities. The National League also provides legal representation on behalf of its members in judicial matters which affect cities. WI Both the League of California Cities and the National League of Cities represent the interests of cities in Sacramento and Washington, D.C., respectively, and communicate to their member cities information that is critical to them. Respectfully Submitted, Susan Mickey, Management Analyst ~^ S.R.E. _ommun~cnc ions 9166492113 ~^ r i~ ,~ League of California Cities ~~ ~ wo~~ ray-cr+e~ April L2, 1993 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Metnbets of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 Dear Mayor Stour: P. 01 Thank you for the opportunity' to explain in detail the services offered by the League of California Cities triggered by the recent Dash $ullerin article. We believe that the quality of service provided by the League is unequalled, yet w•c arc continually reviewdng our work to ensure that we fulfill our mission sramment of "anticipating and meeting the needs of cities." Ofiriously, it is disconcerting to have members of the Legislature denigrate the work of the League, patticulazly wbcn thaz criticism is baud on inaccurate infarmadon. Fot example, the League's Legislative Dinxror and our newest Iobbyis4 who is a 16-year veteran of the Assembly Ways and Means Committee and Deptutrnent of Fittance sratTs, ma with Assembly Member Fred Aguiaz's staff three wccks ergo to specifically discuss his mandates bill N order to reap out a strategy. Further. Assembly Member Bmlte indicated to the reporter that the League was opposed to tnartdate relief, which is absolutely contrary to our position. Finally, n$~dmg the charge that the League only represents fie States lazgest tides, we are one of the tact Stuewide organizations in the country which maintains aone-city/one-vote practice when detertriining any type of League position or polity. U fact, one of the staunchest supporters of this has been Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley. We are hopeful that following discussions with both Legislators quoted there will be a borer understanding of the positions of both sides. The lzague is afull-service association and is the only organisation which meets the needs of all of California's cities. There ate hundreds of services offered by the League, some more visible than ethers. The functional areas of our staff include Legislative Services, Training and Education, Policy Deve.Inpmen[. Membership Services, Legal, Communications and Administrative Suppon. Listed trelow, as you raluested, are only a few of the major secvicas provided by the League of Caiifomia Cities: Legislative Services -The heart of the League is txpresenting the interests of cities in the State Capitol. The main goal is to generate understanding among Legislators that city councils ate the best decision-makers to determine the future of a cotnvtuttity. • Reviews every bill introducers by the Legislature and assigns any bill which impacts city government to one of the League's six staff lobbyisu. Mare than 2,p00tity-related hills were ivnrked" by the Leagtte .staff during t/re Last Legislative session. CONFCRIRCI RlGISrRgrInM OFFICt HEADQUARTERS wurneRn csurogyWy//~~qq((rrlcc ?O'F'm5 ~MgvCrre, rq na5.o 1400 K STREET, SACRAMENTO GA 9561a ~? EASt nuNrwUtorygi(,gIiTEG i51C125Y?IIJ - ,~ MONgeVU fq S. q. E. Go,nmun~c¢t inns 9166492113 p.02 Page 2 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Members of the City Comuil • Provides an overall strategy and coordinated lobbying effort on behalf of all cities. • Conducts weekly stra[egy meetings with every lobbyist which has a city as a client in older to develop approaches to each bill being heard that week and divides assignrrtents among lobbyists. thereby leveraging the League's own staff. • Produces the weekly Legislative Bulletin to ensure cities are aware of legislation and to coordinate the trsponses of cities [o legislative proposals. • Responds to hundreds of phone cslls from city officials regarding the status of legislation via our Legislative Hotline. • Attends and [estifies before Legislative Committce hearings each week m SuPpon or opposition to bills affecting cities. Anends numerous meetings each week of Legtslarors, lobbyists and Legislative staff to negotiate on behalf of city interes[s. • Provides legislative tracking services via our electronic computer ne[work, CIr1LINR. Training and Education • Conducts more than three dozen major training programs each year for elected officials and staff focusing on every issue which impacts tides. • Conducts one of the most successful Annual Conferences of any slate municipal league. Normally, more than IIXJ individual workshops are held during the Conference. Special programs are held far small ctities andTor various functions of city government. from policy makers to fire chiefs to finance directors to public information officers. • Brings rogether a variety of city officials, via our program planning committees, to plan the programs for all major training programs, thereby asking city officials what then nceds ale and then planning educational ussions based on t}tat feedback. Policy Development • Involves hundreds of city officials in the policy developmem ptncess by assigning every bill which impacts cities to one of eight standing policy eomn»ttees, which meet four times per yeaz to tecomtne+td drat the League either support, vpposc or take no position on every bi1L The League's Bvard of Directors detemtines the final position on legislanon. • Standing Policy Committees include Administrative Szrviees, Community Services, Employee Relations, Environmenul Qualirv, Hvusing/Cummunity & Economic Development, Public Safety, Revenue and Taxation. and '1'ransportation/Public Works. Another special policy conunittee deals with growth management. • invites parricipativn from individual cities and groups of dries to develop League policy ny intrrxlucina Resoltaions at the League's Anneal Conferenez. The full membership votes on Resolmivns which, when adopted, becottx a part of the League's work program. Resolmions which are of a natiottal interest are forwarded to the Nadona! League of Cities. S.rl-E. Gommmr~ic¢c ions 9166492113 P. P3 Page 3 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Members of the City Council • I)eveltps overall strategies and poiicies on behalf of all cities -- after considerable input from policy committees -- by the Board ofDirecrors. The 4p-member board is made up of represenwdves from each geographical region of the state, from each functional deparhncnt, irom lazge and small cities serving at-large to ensure balanced and fav repraentation. Membership Services • Invites active participation by alt functional areas of city staff via the League's Departments. The ten key departmental functions of a city, including pobce, fire, finance, city rrtanagemrnt, etc. have then own "track" within the League. A reprcsentativ~e of each Department is included oa the League's Board of Directors. • Coordinates the networking and information-sharing of cities on a regional basis via regular meetings of [he League's Divisions. the 15 Divisions also have reptesentanves on [he League's Board to ensure geographical representation. • Shares inlorrnation wi[h all tides via the nationally-recognized League fibrary. Mora than a thousand requests for information are handled each month by our library and research staff. Sample ordinances, policies, working papers, city attotrtey optmm~s, special publications, newspaper articles. videos and other materials are available for loan from the League's Library. • Responds N special rrqucsts from city staff as pan of our unique inquiry responre program. Cities who have a particular issue or problem -- from needing successful graffiti abatement programs to help with dealing with wild anunals in rown --can contact rite League's Library to see how other cities have responded. • Initiates the production of publications developed to sell to cities at minimal cost The dozens of publications available for order include "Gpett & Public, A users Guide To The Brown Act;' "Municipal Law Handbook; "'Revenue Sources Handbook; "`Child Care Services;' "Mmicipal AIDS Policies and Programs," "Media Relations Guide," and more. • Increases information sharingg via our electronic computer network, C!(fI1NR. Nearly half of California's cities subscribe m CTCA,INK to track legislation, ask questions of other users, send and ree:eive information, monitor trctds in cities, etc. Legal • Cowrdinates the development of positions on pendlrtg /CSislation which impacts all cities. • Updates all city officials on recent court decisions via a regular column in Western Cin. • Provides access and sharing of legal information via the Legs! Services System on CITILINK and via a regular newsletter for all city anorney5• • Chganizes conferences end training programs for city attorneys to meet State Bar educational requirements. S, q. E. Communicnc ions 9166692113 p, Qq Page 4 Mayor Dennis L. Stout Members of the City Council Communications • Publishes Western Ciro Magazine to help shaze successes and discuss important issues facing cities. A free copy i5 distributrd to each member of the city council and each deparmrenr head. Subscriptions are also available. • Brings the issues of cities to the attention of editors and reports throughout the state by conducting meetings with edi[orial boards, issuing press aleases and conducting puss conferences. Conducts statewide public relations campaigns in support of local government issues. • Responds m downs of media calls each week. • Assists individual city public information officers with ne[worldng and ittfortoation sharing. As t mentioned above, [his is a cursory listing of the key services in place. In tervu of the League's budget, approximately half of the League's income comes frwt dues and roughly half from registration fees for gaining programs. Our policies dictate that minimal ootrtribtuions ate accep[ed from corporartons and other private sector interests in order ro ensure we ate bee of conflict when taking positions on lcgislaflon or other manors. I am personally very proud of the commitment of the League staff -- those housed in our Sacramento headquarters, at our Southern California Office and in out Lafayette conference registration office -- to ensuring that the nerds of city officials dietaze om actions, policies, programs and services. You wly have a dedicated t, ann working on yow behalf. The real sgength of the League, however, are the city officials who give of their time and talent m make the League motto, "California Cities Work Together; 'have real meaning. The mutual aspect of city officials and our staff is what makes the League so unique as an institution. i look forward [o hearing from you should you have any question about the services provided by the League of California Cities. Sincerely, ~~ Don cnnin~hoven Executive Dttector c: Jack Lam, City Manager April 12th, 1993 CLASSIC CAB COMPANY 1 (800) 246-7744 `Is. Debbie .Adams !'ity Clerk of Rancho Cucamonga RECEIVED dITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CLERK APR 121993 X718 i 9110{ ll 1121 1; 2; 31415 6 Re: Requesting an audience with the city coon r.il on d-21-93 to discuss the Taxi. lydnance and enforcement thereof. To this date we are the only cab company in compliance with the taxi ordnance. We wish to discuss this problem. Yellow cab is still operating in tour city, without any permits he inq issued to any of its drivers, this seems very unfair. Also; how is the city going to tackle the enforcement problem. The city asked us to comply vith the raising of our insurance coverage, we did and had all the drivers permitted, the Tasi permit for the business obtained and this was done in January of this year. To this date Yellow Cab has operated in this city with no legal authority in this city. Sincerely, CI~~Cab Compan• Robert E. Brad,v P roprie t.or RB/~2 "o P>" r,o file CI~~AIa hY Coq, itl{t lott~r Ct., qln, G ~1T1~ ~7 April 12. 1993 PETITION FOR_FIRE SAFF,T~f_ENFORCENENT whereas. we the undersigned residents of the Neighborhood Housing Association (HOA) Community, do declare and affirm that there is a severe fire danger to the residences, landscaping, and personal properly therein. In order to bring this to the attention of the proper authori- ties, responsible agents oP the Association, Fellow residents oP the Lewis homes Uevelopment known as the HOA, we the undersigned du properly and respectfully protest the condition of the orchard located dac South of the Development proper. In the last seven years the owner(s) of the orchard in question has failed to maintain and trim the trees adjacent to [he Associ- ation's property line. This has resulted in several fires, trash dumpi ngs, and littering associated with transrent and/or vagrant personnel. On April 2, 1993. person or persons unknown set fire to the trees beside the 7051 Wakefield Court residence. Subse- quently, a 911 emergency call was placed to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department and CF'D F'i re Fighters were dispatched to the scene. On April A, 1993, another fire was set by person or persons unknown to the trees beside the 7050 Wakefield Court res- idence. 'Chic is the third occurrence to this residence in the last two years. Several hours were expended to extinguish this fire at great cost to the ci [y' taxpayers. The above instances are but a Pew of the fire settings known to the petitioners. The disregard Por the safety and well being of the life and Vroperty of tAr residents of the Home Owners Associ- ation by the owner(s) oP the said orchard is both unconscionable and irresponsible. Wr thrreforr strongly petition his Honor the Mayor, the Cily Couneii of Rancho Cu r.amonga, the Fire Department Officials. the Ruard Members anJ Representatives of Euclid Management Company, tc enact thr proper measures to have this Pire hazard corrected. Mona hiss Godin ez ~/ _ 'JoSD 'wl~KE6/E~.O c'T. 7050 Wakefield Ct. xJSb ui9~f/ELO ~T 7050 Wakefield Ct. April 12. ]993 PETITION FOR FIRE SAFETY ENFO0.CEMENT .~ ~ 7asr r~A~ cr ~ Ronnie ~irodi ca Dais~~ynn__Reodi ca ~Y` ,4NrPw~ / ~2,_...,~ ~J ~owr DF~/rJl/~J, //.~ ~M*A.lNfL S/HJiNU ~O/~.r-P ~//Q~7//f1 J~ - C~~~~ /e~CK..e.e'~~ ~'CC~ ~.F.2c~ ~ ' r LCa2~c- /.~~-~ ~~ C~ ~_ ~ ~ l.E d ~ . 4 7051 Wakefield Ct. 9051 u1A1~EFlE2G cT 7051 Wakefield Ct. 18 3 8" Pr.~ <~•-- P ~ao-c y~r yg,~ ~., ~~ yB ~a' y~ ~ K . 9P~1 I/~,4 or , ~~ _ ~ ' ~' 9~ S 5 Nk,u~dn P/a.e.e April 12, 1993 PF.T3TION FOR FIRE SAFETY ENFORCEMENT ~ __ __.. %~~Y~ ..~ ~ ~. 4 ~ / •.~ ~~c- ~ ;~ .. ~ C~ - , .~~ _ 9't~axA. U ~r aa-cU ~ ~~' ~1 --- ~ - 9~7.~~ 2 A"~'~~ La .-„ter GJ j' 3 ~ W c,=S~ l~ o %~1 1~ /~ lan1~ f ~ 17 ~( 9~~ 7D3 ~, /~.-u.~ra,~~.~~. -, -, ~ ti ~~ Why-ue,~~,e,(,~ C,~ 70S O NP~..~>" /~af~ ~U~c~ W,~~.ti~z~• ~~ l09 8~// PC, 6966 /Yi<,g7~- ~/. 69CY ,~avmyt+'- ~l April 12. 1993 PETITION FOR_FIRE SAFETY ENFORCF]IENT ~~ ~~~~r~" ,~ ~~ ,~,.,~v ~iC1 /~ ~ ...~ . ,_ . r 7039' L~,46~c1=~K U~ ~~~,-- 7o1g ~RKtiFiti~~ CT .~"~~~ R n FIRE ~~ ~. ~o~~ ~r8 x~:: >~ ~ v ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~, t~l~~~~a~. ~'~r '76 i i l,~a ~~v.~,c C f. ~°'' w a wu to ex fired P~ At tia becsi` c-ea~' Cou. UFG' cleat- the>$' lowq fires' We as reati_ Thaq t}Ifa dlvla° SInC Sues Flre` i cc: ' r 3 F A D!!INISiNALON ~' ~IAv SAIFiY. P.O -~. i ~; ,:~ R FIR E d C H 0 C U PROTECTI Apnl 13, 1993 Mr. Archte D. Wilson 7074 Ramona Street Alta'Loma, CA 91701 12E:: I-ot APN 1076-i81-O1 Deaz Mr. Wilson: ON M~O...~ D I' ~S T Within the past week we have had to respond to two ez to extinguish eucalyptus tree tires originating on your ~ fires have threatened the safety of the homes dtrecUy parcel. ~„ .__ At this time your property has been posted by county wf becairae of weeds and grass. We ere requesting they also clean up the trees, particularly along the north side aga Court and Newton Place. This' letter will serve as a notice to comply from the flr dtst~i~ UFC, 2.204, We are asking to have the eucalyptus treea;trlmt~si(I cleaned oC debris and the accumula0on of combustible tttrrr~~~tter -~ them, '85 UFC. 11.201(a), Ail trees taller than 18 feet s{tta11 8~~ lower branches pruned within 6 feet of the ground tokeepi~i urea from spreading into the tree tope. We also wish to notify you Urat subsequent fires tnvolving khe tr~ result In you being charged a fee for our emergency respohhae. ~ ' Thank you Cor your prompt response to our request forcorrect~ this lke hazard. If you have any questions, you may call the fire ; division Monday through Thursday 7AM to 6PM at 987-6405. I ~' T calla! Thd yours '85i may: of, tv I Sincerely, ', ,j Susan De Antonio Fire Inspector/Investigator ! I I rc: Weed Abatement, Therese Doyle I i'r , DMINISi9nt,ON • Y O.eOM eS] dANf, IIOCJCAMONGA. CA 01)O1.UBSU.Ote)4B ). $5ee,iNX(>1!d)Oe j.O!!1 I iE SAf F1Y •F,D BOk 001 •vANC11U CUC AM ONGA, CA p?IRO-oeoz•(>fa)oev. Baas '•r1x(r?e)oe r.e~ov SAN BERNARAINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OP ACRICULTURFJWEED ABATEMP.NT DIVISION 777 EAST RIALTO AVENUE, SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92415 AUTHOkITY FOR THESII RULES IS CONTATNED IN SAN BEANAADINO COUNTY CODE,TITLE 2, DIVISION 3 CHAPTER 3, SECTION 23.0311. THE WEED AHATEMBNT PROGRAM IS CON- DUCTED Df THE COUNTY ON BEHALF OF'THE CTCY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE 20 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA. If Yoo aro rw loader the owner o(Ihia PropenY or are in the proceu of aelWg k. Pluae inform Ne n<w owner of rhh notlee and adobe Nia o(Rce, in writing, of d,c d.tc Uc title change oc<urrvd aM the namo amt adJmn of rho new owROr. I(yw bit a da ao and +bnamat work it amplgcd, you may be ruponaitrle for the bill. NOTICE TO REMOVE OR ABATE, WILSON, ARCIIZE D 707M1 RAMONA 5T .~ ALTA LOMAf CA 91701 ~~ RE: PARCEL 1076-381-OS 7074 RAMONA ST ALTA LOMA YOU AR@ IIERHBY NOTIFlHD TO R@MOV@ FROM YOVR PROP@RTY (INCLUDING PARKWAYS, ROADSIDES, AND @AS@MRNTS) 9PHCIPIC MENTIONED ITEMS DHSCRIBED BELOW WHICH CONSTti'U'1'H A FIRE, IIHALTH, OR SAFETY HAZARD. I7EMh$): WEEDS AND GRASS LOC.ATION(R): ARRAS ADJACRNT TO OR ON PRN('.R LINR$OR PROPERTY ROIMDARIFC VACANT PORTIUNS/PEAR PORTIONS OP PROPERTY COMPhP,TF, pflATF.hIENT OP AOOVF. IfAZARDS REQUIRED * * * * I MPORTANT * * * *IM PORTANT* * * *IMPORTANT IF ITEMS ARE NOT R8MOV8D OR ABATRD RY 04!25/93 A DULY DESIGNATED OFFICER MAY ORD6ft TN6 SAID ITEMS REMOVED OR AAATED. IP TEIR COUNTY HAS T178 AEOVE SAID ITEMS ADATBD OR RBMOVHD, THE COST SHALL B8 LEVIED AND ASSESSED AGAINST THE PROPERTY AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LIEN, OR BILLED DIRECTLY TO THE PROPERTY OWNER. Any yueatiooa rcg+Ning Ihir notice mmt be b,eeght lonh prior m the bat J+IC m RCMOVB, anJ JirateJ a the agency officer whose name anJ WJrcu appur below. The agency nffieef will answer any yuuliom anJ/or amon~< for • haring. Punwnt to San BernarJlno Code, Seolion 2].0]d, any appal to Ihir Notice mu>( be RkJ in writing with the enforcemem o(R: <r IialeJ below within the time (of conlplian<e of Ihia notice. If you clear your Parcel nger the lima tar wmpllance e(Ihb noti:a an adininitlmlive (cc may be added as a special uacafmml hen. PROPERTY OWNERS ARH ADVISED TF{pT REGROWPH AFfHR TIIC FIRST RHMOVAL SROV W NOT BC PHRMITTHD DURING THH PIRP S@ASON. OR ARATEM ENT CR@WS M1IAV CLEM gEORONTH WITHOUT ADDITIONAL NOTIPoCATION. IP YOU DESIgH TO BE NOTIPIRD AGAIN. YOU M11UST RP.QUN.ST A LHTTHR OP COMPLLVJCE UPON THE COMPLETON OP REQUIRED WORK. If goo rcuive no04o nn nJlacenl puccb a•f DwIKOY •nJ you wiab them abakJ n one piµe of IanJ, ~~~t+a this o0kq in writing, prior In the eaylratron Jalc xhown abov<. 1! you do not mAAc prior art.+nR<mcnta with w ;mJ the work ix Jone by the agency +howm nn J,ia notion, tqe dJja<en1 yarcola will be billed xcpnrat<ly for coat of nbnluncnt and admmirlmtivc <harRa, AMo, it is nunvry lbl th<xe mangem<nU h< reneweJ, in writing, a<h limo a noon ix baueJ. TIIERESE DOYLE 7965 SIf:RRA AVC• SUITE L FONT.ANA, <.'A 92375 (71 A) )563258 MESSAGE PHONE 787-2111 OFFICE IIg1.11Y.5: 78:711 n. nl. DA'PE MAILRD; Od/02/9J r rl'd VOp'DN L[:tl £6'V. Jdtl yVVC~S£ViL'Dhl '1B3 "1111t-59H Ohd1~7 iJHNd38 Nd5 . O~TAR,O 'CITY OF =? ONTARIO 303 EAST"t3"STREET, CIVIC CENTER ONTARIO '~ CALIFORNIA 917&4-4196 (909(996-1151 fAX (909) 391-25/A .V~MEa R, rAnnNo ~+~ro, April 21, 1993 6. MICtuFL AaUll$ER ^JNMaga~ Gus ~, slatoros Mqv 9o iYn aM w 90'ATAAY RWY G. FAVaA GNNC OVRT Cwc, MxrBe„ The Honorable Mayor Demia Stout City of Rusho Cucamotlga 10500 Civic Center Drive Reecho GLcamoega, CA 91701 Dear Mayor Stout: C'HMIEi L MIKSFR ~+r'~w DE LORIS E ARIERBURN. CMC prom This is in refetezre m the propoxd locative of the Day Laborer ]ob Cemer at 8th Street acrd Grove Avemta. Although the item coWd not be conaideral at last evening's City Council meetlag, due to al{~ l~tlag requirma,ou, the hellogs oI the Oautlo Clry Cour4c11 arc elev. Based o9 a diawuioa at a previous City Council eual9g it ie my belief char our City Council could nor mPPvn • proposed Crnter u this tocation. The problems caused by dey laborers are twmetoae sad have been discussed m length by our residetns in Ne local press. Additlonally, our reprexnutlvp at the Day Laborer Task fiorce meuiags have also indicated out City's oppwitlon to this Site. While we are sympathetic to the plight of day laborers we don't believe stud their problems should be resolved B the expense of our rai4lems. Such a Center should snore properly be hated In an area that is tla twadguous to a residrntial area, such a9 a purely hldUStrid mee. AttacF¢d is a petition from Ontuio rafdems opposing thu location. WNIe we roaliu flat the City of Rancho Cucamonga is ett4powved to make its own toad ux declslom, we would aittcerely urge slut the proposed 8th Street and Grove Avenue eke a4n 6e udllxed. Sifn~cere~ly//J ,~/ G. MICHAEL MILNISER A7r'U City Manager /sr c: Ontvio City CouncB ZO'd Z890t6EDlt 'ON Htld NIWah - 018tl1N0 d0 AJ.10 EZ'9l 09M E6-lZ-8dtl _4PRr22-93 WED i6~24 CITY OF ONTARIO - ADhIN FAX N0. 7143910692 P. 03 November 20, 1y92 City o[ Ontur/o 707 Eeet B 3treut Oncerto, Cnllfornix Y1764 Re: Proposed I.e bor Cemp at Eighth 8 trove Avrnue Attn; P.ayor J1ia Facland Dear Msyor Faeland: i<ut.:_iVED ONTARIO CITY COUNCIL woo z a 1992 AM PM 71818161 p l@ 111213141610 !1 We ere writing thin lector in reeponxv [x the above mentioned p roponnl by tbo (:I ty o[ Rxncno Cucamonga to build a labor temp in our nelghunrho od, We residents me up in ores with this proposal. Many of ue have lived in our homee over thirty years, are retired on fixed incomes ^nd know whet having this labor camp in our neighborhood will dv to our property values, They rill plummet, Whu uru our eluLied ufficiulr suppose to reyrueeat? Employero who pay legal and ilinga~ atienw cx ah eo wave both from paying their share of Coate. Don [ you chink 1C io tlme to properly repreaeat Che ordinary taxpayers oho put you in off ico7 With crime and drugs running rampant in our cities, rhy rould any elrceed uilittul entertain ruck • yroyoeel? You rre elected into ofPlce to act in Cho beat inierext of your conrtltuenta. Putting e Iebor temp in a reaidentiel area ie a complete violation of ehie Croat, We oil! not rnlecete this in our nrighbn rhood just like you rould nut tulereee i[ in yours. We demand you du everything Doaaible to see Chia labor camp ie net built in nor neighborhood. Thcrc meal be sites uvuilubla rhere thla could bu boil[ without 0e Lrg In a ruwldentixl arse. 9lncerely, „ f/7o.~ ~..~... •~U,.. l .1 {. l,/w••rp. ~~ ..~ i :llflrr-~ . -O~~ I<i ~r.,..~•~ , t ~,... •.. ~...-~- cc: Jim bowman Cua Skruyua Gory Uv ltc Rudy Fevlia it LlYt~~~l ~+L~.+:tt,(~i ', ,~ , ~J..41. r, L -r, l•~I, •L1/`I:L N.~ Cti~.cflL Ra/Ly `~t ,~;...~;.. ~s ~ ~ - .. /4!tirL n~~'~ w\ '~ n'tr~ ~~ ~.~~~ ~~,, h~~ ~ln~f ',`~ OVER APR-21-33 WED 16:24L CITY ~ ONTARIO - ADNIN FAX N0. 1143910892 P. 04 - // .. ' /~~lrc.~(f i. ~~~ ~~/CAI ~~~! 1 ~J'~~i/ 1l~~lL•ll/ ~7M w l~ .. ~...,~ .~,-.~ lll~/l l~ -- ~i / •l~' ~'~ ;• ~ ~ r' - 't ,~rl~-~•I'~.~, jai { [..<< ~ .~yam, . ~ r. T~EL:It.. C~~l ~,~~~~~l~l t,.:. ..~ ., ru'~ ~~OWi00/Y, ~ PEOPLE AGAINST DAY LABOR CAMP /_~ J~~~P<1C~ ~ ~~ N ~~/ ~~~ ~t>~~~ fdr J . 1 i ~~~,i ~~,~~~.. y~ ~e~ ~ F ~~' ~w i~...~ ~u~,~ ~, v ~~~~~~~~~-~c __, ---~- ~~ ,, ,, ~~,.u~7i. L:~T,2>r~. '~ /~ ~~ «< ~~. .~ . ~f a.~ ~/ ,~~, ~~ 1. ~~ ~( "-l iC'- `~ ~ ~ ~~; ~~ _2 -/1 ~i~--~ ~~~~~~ ,~~ J ~. ~ ,~,,~4-ti~a 4'V1 `,~~_ ~'. ~.,,~ '~~~ ~fz'=`'rh 6 '~" ~'~)~-~~t~rt~~ c w, ~ ~ ~ G ` ~i~t T ; ~ z~r~~/ ^~~~ ~~~ ~ ~G ~ 3~~.~ ~~,~, ~ /- X;~ 2,c~F' ~~K~P ~`'2 ~~~~~~r~/~~- PEOPLE AGAINST BAY LABOR CAMP `~/ / ._. ~ a~ ~ ~ / J /{ ~' ~'~ ~~~7 ,~'; ~~ ~.~ .6 ~%t ~,c~lL t`~"'-`'mil -- ~~~~.u~~.n. ~~ d -rte C ~ ~_ ~~ c) P ~t.~C ? ~ti. a~ ~~ '~ .//,jam ,/ V ~. ~ u~ N \ ~ ~' //~'~ n 1i ~ ~ ~'.J~~iY-~ardr '~, ~~7U~<1 c0. - ~,-,~~Y ~ 1 ~ ~~~a~«~. ~~ _ ' - ~- ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 9 r~ ~~~ ~ ~" ~ ~ ~ti,t cx. jti ~ ~ .. /~ r~ ~ PEOPLE AGAINST DAY LABOR CAMP ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ - , ; '~, ~.: ~ ~ ~, ~'' ~~ ,~~ ;~ 2 `/' I`~`t'~~', ~a~, ~ . Yl')~ ~~ ~c-¢2 ~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~.~ ~kj.~.~ ~, C~~-,n~aJ Qa'~~, 7~ >J~'~,~F, ~/~,~~ _ ~ {/a/iLR. V '"~~~ ~C{C l/1 f ~ Gl llu.~ ' r ~/l6/ ~ ~~ ``~' P60PLE AGAINST DAY LABOR CAMP ~~ ~' ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ PEOPLE AGAINST DAY LABOR CAMP 11/LU.. ~Lf ~ ---- I'd1® ~_ • Re~'moNO ~!- C't~ ~ 5i7~ r"-""_tiy~ lye C/F~'-~E ..~t IsH ~Plan]d d~i~"I~cG/.r~u~4 ~-?5° ~'.Bt-~^"-o~.o:~. ~i0. /~~,.e ~i/ 7.7a 0 z.,dra w~ {a- -~ /oyOO Arrow Rokt..-}i' F-o/J ~~o ~uca.+cya, 9/730 / WI/Y ` 11/`~~ I ~i J ~ J ~J~ ~ 7/ ~~V _.. K. PEOPLE AGAINST DAY LABOR CAMP ~ ciy~~,,,~,~p 3 -~Qf%~~.~ ~ S /C~l~ ~ . ~~~ .^ ~ ~ . ~ . c.-~%lc2a~~ea/ ~ ~ . ~` ~1 ~ ~~ 5~hri.S\~~,LLeS ~- ~- ,. /~ ~ i~~il1~ !I .LV 'r' l 3 f'~- ,~/~~~ ry /5 ~~ i~ /9 ~o z~ z~ ~3 ~,~ ~~-~~ ~; .. 1 Ll~U~ll ~_ .(~'~ ~;CL z$ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ 2 7 /~ P.~.t~_ Z 9 .,,~,, a( ~~,,.._,. 19 ~ ;-:.t tc~~~ ~- 3 i ~~ 32 ~ .`' ~~ 334Z~~~~ , 3L 1~~ 3 7 /_~0.-- 39~ ~. ~~~ y~ c~.. ~ ____~ ~l i .y a.7 Lam.,-:~-- ~~~r. ~`3 ' ( .. y6~~-~ ~~ ,/' PEOPLE AGAINST DAY LAEOR CAMP `l Y ~k i l ~~..~ ~y 1i.1 ~G ~ 7 S I ~ n ~i~~~~ 7 S ln,~u< mm c'r~J 5G ~~ ,~ -moo ac,~, :-. ;,sue/. 6/mar ~a ~ ~,a ~ '~ ~~ i~ /~~.~ is ~~ ~~ ~ , ~, ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ , ~ ~5~ ~ ~~~,.~„- ~ 0 ~ ~~ To YWe Nonocmble Mayor of Rancho Cucamonga penryie Stout aM the City Council of that city. We, the utdersignad ~ Protest tha east corner of Crovs lvetws and proPoaed uae at the North by the City Council. d ELBbth Street as rsoo~eMed . single f flM7 labor Cn~ aerosa the atrast from The ezis~ homes is an Smppropiate vee aad bad solid single famile~rw ~~ ~~ 1x177 De shifted. city Plans to salt surplus pro we ,o~m our hoses, rf Y9u>•• to finance this Pe~9s LhaL yo4 Presentlq ot,n~ . on such pro~;arty,~, ror^6~ Pr°aeat xQt (p n~ot,/b//u~i/]ld~//t/h~e~~o//b~~c~e~ntar~/~fj/.~~, >~.~J~-~~ - /737 .9vx.~di.ti-- ,mac. ,~ . i Q ~litw~.,bo 1 $J6 . ~Q2`06'f//,~N - ©Xi~i~~'a . p~ . ~~rwaz-. U~'-~ \ 3 ~-'w I~ is I~ Iv ~~{ Cf • O • -1,. r • CAL . ` /337 ~. 7r~.dr - ~'., ~ . a~~ _ j ~'v^ l ass ~~~ c~~ o ~ / '1'~-C~-.~a~~Q~+ ~~ ~ 3 3 ~ E / ~lj S /~ O.U/Ar~'Ja ;2 e, ! i~ ~ ~ ~'/ ~ / 3,75 E 7 .r.C ST ['~...~o.~w. ~,rr 1.z.~t- G4 n. ~ ~~21 rUl 1317~~7~~ (~, ~ ~ . ,. ; :~ ~., a ~a.a c~~$-e c~ oo~wr i csoo~ 2~6-nom .4pri1 19, 1993 To: City of Rancho Cucamonga Honorable Mayor and Council Members Prom: Classic Cab Company Robert Brady, Owner Craig Zibell, Operetiona Manager We wish to inform the Council that of this date Yellow Cab has finally licensed their company. But none of Eheir drivers have be"'permitted. Gene 3taliene the owner of Yellow Cab Yelt that there was a very strong need for an Ordinance in the City oP Rancho Cucamonga, but apparently does not feel that it be imperative that him or his company need comply, at least not in a timely manner. My company started compliance on January 11, 1993. Aa of this date my company and all ay drivers are permitted. Yellow Cab as of this data hoe not one driver permitted, but continue to operate as a legal carrier within this city. I wish to request of this council Lo mnke Yellow Cabs permits Lo be at least retroactive to my start date so as to insure equal compliance with Lhe ordinance. To also lnaure that all drivers picking up passengers within the cltq ere permitted, I would also like to know how the city will enforce the ordinance. Any permitted carrier could say that only a part of their company operates within your city. Thank you, Classic Cab Company Robert Brady Proprietor RB/ez copy to Pile clotl. h~ c.+ma~, 1!!N Lwlar Ct., al.., N riTiB Page i ....,....,... . _ . . ' ~ ~ ~ Vehicle, Inventory Liat - Active Vehicles Vehk Year Make Model VIN Number Licease ACWSzed ss==sco.~v=oecaa=x.aco..os.voooae=zc..ee..e~vazaeeeva=s.aais:naesammaasaesxv 001 - Yellow Cab ; 322 1985 PORD CROWN VICT iPABP44P8PZ1~.979d 3X72394 325 1987 PORD CROWN VICT .2PABP72P4RX2O6396 3Y99674 326 19.$5= PORD CROWN VICT 2PA8Pd4P2PX183061 ;~ dA86505 327 19 B4_ PORD CROWN VICT 1PAEPd3P3EZ177326 ^_ ~ •4P97093 328 14~5"~ PORD CROWN VICT SPABI43PBPZ231182 ~ ~;4Cd4867 329 1985 PORD CROWN VICT 2PABP44P6PX261658 •dCdd671 330 1987 FORD CROWN VICT 2PABP73PXlOC21d090 dC46866 331 1983 MERCURY SEDIi(1 1MEBP95PGD2609728 4K75790 332 1986 MERCURY SEDAN 2MEBP95P3IX638193 dC99d55 333 1985 PORD CROWN VICT 2PA8Pd3P5PX217306 ~ 6K56091 33d 1988 PORD CROWN VICT 2PAEP72P7JX107604 6ED6735 335 1985 MERCURY COLONY 'PAR 1MEEP94P3PZ600957 6D63051 336 1983 MERCURY COLONY PAR ~ iMEBP94P4D2671808 dD610 S0 337 1988 FORD CROWN VICT 2PABP72PBJX192209 ~ dD61898 338 1988 PORD CROWN VICT. 2PABB72P3JX192201 6E06896 339 1988 PORD CROWN VIGT 2PABP72P8JX192212 6D61900 3d0 1988 PORD CROWN VZCT DPABP72P2JX192206 dD61899 3d2 1988 PORD CROWN VICT 2PABP72P3JX192196 dE07097 343 1988 PORD CROWN VICT 2PA8P72P1JX192195 4607098 345 1988 PORD ~ CROWN VICT ~ 2PABP72P2JX192190 4E90301 346 1988 PORD CROWN VICT 2PAEP72P8JX192192 dP96962 347 1987 PORD CAOWN VICT 2PAHP73P4RX138110 dP21996 348 1987 Pord Crows Vict 2PABP72GXNX170991 4K48670 349 1987 Pord Crows Viet 2PABP72G5NX17099d dL91775 350 1988 Pord Crown Vict 2PABP72PSJX190465 ~dF2195d 352 1989 Pord ~ LTD S/W 2PA8P76PSIIX178S85 dKd8671 353 1986 MERCURY MAROUIB 2lD:BP95PSGX62769d dKd8746 354 1986 Mercury S/W 2MEBP9dB76X638375, dkSd149 355 1987 PORD CROWN VICT. 2PABP76PSIOtJ78585 dK80667 356 1985 MERCURY GRAND MARQ. 2MEBP95PdPX633132 dK80597 3S7 1986 PORD CROWEi VICT 2PABP6383GX193032 dK80806 358 1986 PORD CROWN VZCT 2PA8PddPOGX1946d0 4G72794 359 1986 PORD CROWN VICT ~ 2PASPd3P46X193038 dK76266 360 1986 PORD CROWN VICT 2PA8P43P2GX1930d0 'dK7.626d 361 1986 PORD CROWN VICT 2PABPd3P8CX1930d2 dK807SS 362 1987 PORD CROWN VICT 2PABP72G9NX170996 ~ 41:80754 363 1988 PORD CROWN VICT 2PABPG3XJX136915 dR807S3 364 1988 PORD CROWN VICT 2PABP72G8JX136909 dN87286 365 1989 PORD CROWN VICT 2PABP7dP3KX150366 4N87254 366 1992 PORD CROWN VICT 2PACP7861LX1d6172 dP7992B 367 3987 PORD CROWN VICT '' 2PABP72PeNX160192 4N87388 368 1987 FORD CAOWII VICT 2PA8P72P7NX187d33 dA588d7 369 1990 PORD CROWN VICT 2PACP720XLSd6171 dASB846 370 1991 LOAD CAOWN VICT PEND2110 371 1988 POAD CAOW11 VICT PAWDING 372 1992 DODGE IM8-MINIWI 2sdoA2sz2MA7888s7 377646 377 1992 DODGE IN{-MIIIIVJI 2>)40A28AON1t7S68S8 377S4S 37~ 1992 DODGE IMS-MINIVA 2EdON25KdNA7868S9 377564 10/2~/1i91 10/13/1992 MRR-22-199Ci 11=02 FRQ/ DIIFRSIF[ED Pi7PiiTRiYi51T ~e 1 Diversified Paratransit, Ine. J ~[ Mallow Cab Company - Driver Taxi P ~eit Liat List of-Drivers a Parait Nuabera Tor YsLIOw C "`Conga ears marked with an sss have applied for peroit t it hs 5916829 P.02 Mon 03-22-1993 ftfi.Ia of 03/22/?3.' a not bean isaued. NDE, AOEI:ONU. AMARZN, SANZ ~ AMIIIBIA, ROBERT A14943 A14935 TIN, ROBERT BALRD', 4REGORY BIR, ROMAN A13158 sss SSZNG, BYRON GLUM. SCOTT BRILL, STEVE ess sss HANAN, BILL: BURGESS, LAMES BURNETT, GARY • 430 sss ' A9132 TERFIEID, OA ~ CAIRNS, CRAIG CARRIGAN, STEVEN ' sss A13863 3NISHOV, YURI CORNFORTH, DAVID CORNWELL, EUGENE A9732 . A1294Z OKS, RAY CROW. ROBERT DANE. JERRY A11718 A14559 ANTHONY DIAZ, EVARIST OOMINGUE2, BUILIER A14631 A14923 _. OSCAR ELDRIDOE ,•RALPH ERSKINB, TIMOTHY 30 A12416 A10831 [NOSH, RICHARD EVANS, LINDA EVANS,JR, CEORIC 418 A7656 A13513 0,, RICHARD GONZALES, HARRY GRAYS, OLLZE 264 A14853 A11403 ' IDANEr ANDREW HERYZ08, JOHN. HILO, JAC0118 ' ' 542 A149S8 sss TINS, FRNEST MORTON, JEFFREY HOWELL, MICHAEL 928 A14726 A12B83 .NC. AlM7ET KERN. MICHAEL KILIC, NURAT ~, 727 sas A34816 S. Cf1A1lLES LAPONZA, ANTHONY LAWRENCE, STEVE sae A33303 pe 2 Diversified PaTatranaii, Yellow Cab Company - Driver Taxi P~ st of Crivers 3 Permit Numbers for Yellow Cab Ca ivera marked with an tst have applied for permit RBLFSK7 ~FL.W IN 3846 RTIN, J4~lN 4975 O.DI D~ 0602 UNGEY.ROBERT x COLL, JAMES 17423 .iAPONG, RENATO 4860 WLOSKI, RICHARD 4025 NOER, DWIGHT 493 ENTISS, JOHN 0371 YES, THOMAS 4936 ESCH, BRIAN 4691 HLANG4R, WILLIAM 1596 DAN, DONALD 765 ~LTERO, FELIPE 4839 EARNS, GREGORY i ' MALIK, MOHAMMA ~~ A12995 MARTIN, NATHAN A9714 ~nl Dnr~D tti MULOOONr JOHN iti OWENS, JAMES A14540 PANZAREILA, ANTHONY A14922 PETERS, DOUGLAS A13673 POUNDERS, LARRI iti OUESADA',,DE60RAH iii RIGGI, JOSEPH A14212 RWSSELL, WALLACE A30817 SCNONBACHLHR, lDWARO A109S7 SMITH, OARRYL ~ AL4736 SOUTHALL, HARDEN ii# SULiMAN, ARIL iss f ., ~ Rf'INII? Mon 03-22^1993 List 03/22/93. it has not been issued. ~~• MARkEt, KIRK A13871 MAY?OT(~ RONALD A13159' ~1i~1~1i ~f tti NAUFFAL, RICHARD A13224 OWENS, RICCI A1102S PARKES, JAMES A11025 , i PETERSON, JOHN iti I, POIARICH, 808 tie RAMIREZ, LUIS iii ROMERO, DANNY A14938 SANCMEZ. RAUL iii EIMON, DONALD A11071 SNELI, ROBERT A12613 SOUINE, TERRY A9631 SUtY£RS, ROBERt A11708 THOMAS, JOHN 3e ~3. Diversified Parstransit, Inc Yellow Cab Company - Orivar Taxi P rmi a of Drivers 6 Dermit Numbers for Yellow Cab Co an' ivera marked with an sxa have epplied for permit but :=aaaz==za=a=zxzszazzszaz==szsaasaa~aaasaz:zzsaz zzs. "TER, JOHN , -_ .LONE, KENNETH 3673 'ATOE, GERALD 3128 ;tIINGTON, .DEPORRE '34 .$ON, AUBREY AS, TOM •866 TSE^uAYE, YOHANNE A12798 VARGAS,, OAVZO A13~67 VRANES, ~DETER A14200 WATSON, JOSEPH A12212 WINKLE, MERLON A11411 Mon 03-22-1993 List 03/22/93. it has not boon iaaued. wct "" VAGIE, ROGER A13~27" :A ~.. VINCENY~, GILBERT A14277 WARREN, ALLAN A14631 WEZLER, R08ERT esa WIR7, KITTREI ' sii . <<C<<<<f End Of ROPOrt » » >>>>>> CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: April ]s, 1993 MEMORANDUM -:~: 70: Mayor and Members of the C'ty ounctl FROM: lack Lam, AICP, City Manager ";~ BY: Linda D. Daniiii§;~Redevelopment Manager SUBJEL'P. LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE STADRIM TENANT WHICH PROVIDES FOR TEMPORARY PARKING FOR THE 1993 SEASON Late Wednesday afternoon the City and the Tenant met to resolve the concern of where to provide temporary parking for Quake's baseball patrons. The tenant indicated that they have an agreement with Jack Masi to utilize a portion of the property which he owns directly north of the stadium. The tenant is proposing to clear approximately six acres of land, provide a gravel base and security lighting so that temporary auxiliary parking facilities are available for the next game on April 23, 1993. In discussing the processing requirements of the project, the concerns for the requirement of environmental review and Conditional Use Permit (requirement for temporary facilities in the industrial area) issuance were raised. In order to complete the parking area by that time, the City and the tenant discussed the need for it to be covered under the Lease through a Letter Agreement so that these were not required for the temporary facility since they are needed for the public purpose of providing parking for the stadium. The City Attorney's office is developing the Letter Agreement. It will not, however, be available to be included as part of the Council packet. The Agreement is expected to be completed and delivered to the City Council no later than Tuesday afternoon. If you should have any questions regarding the proposed Agreement please feel free to call me or Linda Daniels. - a.ul yr RnlvV nv l'Vl~H1v1Vlv6n MEMORANDUM DATE: April 20, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the Ci ouncil FROM: Jack Lam, A[CP, City Manager 1 BY: Linda D. Danie ,Redevelopment Manager SUB)ECI'. LETTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL CLUB PROVIDING FOR AUXILIARY PARKING FACILITIES FOR PATRONS OF THE QUAKES GAMES Attached to this cover memo is a Letter Agreement which has been prepared by the City Attorney. The Letter Agreement is between the City and The Rancho Cucamonga Professional Baseball Club and provides for an auxiliazy pazking lot on the site north of the Sport; Cun.~lex. Approval of the Letter Agreement is on the April 21, 195%3 City Council agenda. If you should have any questions regarding the attached Letter Agreement please feel free to call me or Linda Daniels. A P P ,- 1 9- 5 ~ Cq G N 1 1 c 0 Y )•1 A R K N A N ~ A R C 2 Y N S K I P D 2/ 91 4 1' nar ~`~'rmlY ~ y9e~/:v, C~ie3tfaw /4/3'UCA)2l39i~ ~t A~'. ~) <2u`/ ~q i ~ ~~ d O1tRG~' ~'~"`G"" O J AM[S L,MAgnMAN / S F'UM9cx OHL' CIVIC C[NiCM CIRCLC AN DR[W V ARC1YN 31{1 Y. O. eOX IO Sp RAIVII D. XAN SON lRCA~CA LIfOgNIA 92623.1099 JC)/p EY M:NO IYI319p 0.O p01 i[C[rvH ONC p. LgAI C. IOX 0101 0 91-00 11 WILLIAM /. CVgICY [fl ~. MAg9ryA O. SLO'JJH DIU IOOiHI It 90uLCVARD JULIA A, rtCMi SURE E00 PAN.[U P. MIND R AN[n0 CJCAM O.VOA. CALIIOPN IA 9 V 10 NeRIOL Rto r. DIAx April 21, 1993 DD9~ pBO.2 )!2 BONNIC gAIIC Y~JO NE9 T[LCPHOnE IpOD 181-0218 1N RCPLY PLEAS[ RCICR TO: Valley Baseball Club, Inc. c/o Henry E. Stickney Brea 750 City Drive, Suite 210 Orange, California 92668 RE: Addition to Lease Agreement between Clty oP Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Ino., to provide temporary additional parking. - Dear Hank: The purpose of this letter is to memorialize our agreement on the above referenced topic. As we all understand, there exists a need for parking during baseball games conducted at the stadium which is the subject matter of the lease between the City and Valley Baseball Club, Inc. dated September 16, 1992 (the "Lease" hereinafter) OP course, there are various reasons for the need for parking addit ioral to that Which is included pursuant to the Lease, not the least oP which is the success which has been achieved in ticket sales. Also, additional seating has been incorporated in the stadium since the time when the Lease was executed. You have informed us that yeu have arranged for such additional parking to occur in that area indicated on Exhibit "A" hereto wt2lch is shown as "proposed Parking, Approximately Acres." It is the purpose of this letter agreement to constitute an addendum to the Lease, as dmended. Pursuant to this letter agreement, Valley Baseball Club, Inc, shall be authorized and allowed to provide parking Eor baseball events on the eix acres shown on Exhibit "A" hereto during that period of time commencing April 15, 1993 through and including September 15, 1993. With respect thereto, the provisions of paragraphs 15 through 18, inclusive, of the Lease shall apply to Valley Baseball club Inc.'s use oP the temporary parking facility specified herein. Those provisions, as you know, A P R- 1 9- 9 3 M O N 1 1 0 2 M A R K M ci N a'7 A R C ~ Y N S K I P 0 3 i 0 4 Valley Baseball club, Inc. April 21, 1993 Page Two provide indemnification and insurance to the City and its agents, officers, employees, contractors and invitees with respect to your company's use of the property in question. Further, Immediately upon full execution of this letter agreement, your company shall provide to City an insurance certificate or other evidence of insurance indicating that the prow iaions of paragraphs 1G through 18 of the Lease have bean made applicable to the temporary parking areas. That evidence of Sneurance shall comply with the provisions of paragraph 18 of the Lease. The parties understand that Valley Baseball Club, Inc. will improve, at its sole aost and expense, the area to be used for temporary parking to the satisfaction of City's City Manager. Finally, with respect to revenues generated at the temporary parking facility, such revenue shall be retained in whole by Valley Baseball Club, Inc. in consideration of its providing and improving the area necessary for temporary parking specified herein. If this agreement reflects our understanding, please execute the copy provided where indicated below and return that copy to ma, thereby entering into this agreement. Very truly yours, Jack Lam City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga JL\J LM:CIf C\131\LVALEYBB Enclosure Dated: __ Valley Baseball Club, Inc. By. Nenry E. St ckThey -~ APR-IS-JS Ft l7 flVV i.''r-~.f. 4~~y rt..__.............._........_... II ...... __. ~~ Y II~ I -u !~' r.-- .~ ~ a S7G ~ U ~~. ~~ ~: `~ ~ ~o R KMAN z 2 ~ ARC ZlYNSK I ... ~L, ~...1! 1~ ((~ ~ ..~ 1~ cZ W r `~J P.04~04 0 AMES L. HAP ttMAN ANpgEW V, gp<2YN SIU PALGH 0. XANSON J EfEP. EY MIHG O. Cgtt16 EOF WILLIAM p CU4LEY m MAgSMA G. SLOUGH JVLIA A. ttEMP PAMELA v. NINc H E919EflT0 G. pIA$ BONNIE 9AILEV-JONES ~~ .~~~~~~ April 9, 1943 P. O. C01. 1059 89FA. CALIfOP(((HIA DJ022-1068 iF LE VXONE 8]111990-ODOI lIJl01 6 B 1.3 011 9113 fOOTMI LL BOYLNARO bVliC 200 gANCXO CVCAMONOA. CALIEOPNIA 912]0 19091 flB0-3]12 iLLL9XOXE 19091381- 0218 MEMORANDUM TO: Debbie Adams, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga FROM: William P. Curley III Deputy City Attorney.,(}) RE: Rancho Cucamonga v. Peterson IH gEPLY PLGCE pE(Cq T0'. Enclosed herewith please find a memorandum to the City Council. This item is for the Executive Session of April 21, 1993. Please place this matter on the agenda and include the attached memorandum in the Council packets. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. WPC/nlc N\131\MADAMS \RC12 cc: Dan James C~ryCF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIN CLERK APR 131993 L1814IAOIllU21112~3~4 5 6 -~ ~ ,/ / v ~3(/ .,Lla[,~3a m e ~ ~ /493d0,b & L/(ytd O , O ~ j y/ '/ (~ ~ ~( ~~ ( ~ ~ JAMCE L. MARXMAN . ~ y ,y ~ ~ ~~^~"-"/'-"^`-T'~ M NVM9EP ON[CIVIC CFNiCP CIRC LE r: F '~ ~ 9 ~' i n! ~ ~ ~ AN OPEW V APCSVNEFI ! r - ~ A, P. O~ BOF 1059 RALPH O. HANSOM BPEA. CALIFORNIA 836231059 ~ JEPFP EY XING 111A BD00801 ~ ~ ~~}!= i • O.CRAI6 fOM TELEPHONE ~ .• ~ {13101691]011 ~~•1' ~ ~ WIL LIAM P. CVRLCYm ... ... ~. ~~~Jn~} ~ ~ ~~~ MARSHA G.SLO V6X r I~~y1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 911]fOOiHILL 9DVLE VAflO PAMf LA P. ING X ~~-e•~~-~... ... .._.. ~ ~ VIiE 3p0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ HE Pl9E Rio F. olAZ PA NCHO CUCAM ONG A. CALIFORNIA 911]0 April 8, 1993 rmo91 9eo-zv nx BONNIC BAIL EY~JpNES YELEPHONE ~ID091 301-021 B MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Dennis Stout, Mayor Pro T¢ID CharlesP D Buquet, Council Members William Alexander , Rex Gutierre2 and Diane Williams and Jack Lam, City Manager FROM: s~7 ,( James L. Markman, City Attorney /~~~'~ I ,,,111;' William P. Curley III, Deputy CiEy Attorneys \""" RE: Rancho Cucamonga v. Peterson; Settlement of Eminent Domain Action E%ACQTZVE 9IIMMARy Request approval of settlement of condemnation action for the full sum of $105,000.00. All costs of litigation, including settlement sums to be paid by Watt Development through an existing subdivision acquisition agreement. AIBTORY Watt Development has previously applied and been granted development entitlements for Tract 13812. A condition of development required Summit Avenue to be improved by Watt Development. Watt, by negotiations, acquired all the right-of-way necessary to improve Summit Avenue, with the exception of two contiguous parcels owned by Mr. and Mrs. Peterson. Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act provisions, the City hae commenced the eminent domain action in furtherance of Watt's condition of development; Watt Development is paying all costs of acquisition in this case. All parties, with the exception of the Petersons, have either been defaulted or disclaimed any interest in this property. This matter was submitted to nonbinding arbitration wherein the Plaintiff raised issues regarding development potential and submitted plat maps showing joinder of the subject parcels and the surrounding parcels which would result Memorandum to City Council and City Manager April 8, 1993 Page Two in a larger, developable area. The Defendant submitted valuation evidence asaertinq the property value is $183,000.00. The arbitrator was not entirely familiar with the eminent domain discipline and awarded the value sum of $83,000.00 and improperly required the property owner to pay the same to the City. This indicates that the arbitrator did not fully grasp the legal theories and valuation evidence submitted to him. While it is unlikely that the Defendant~a valuation figure of $183,000.00 is supportable, it is very likely that the parcel joinder plan would enhance the value beyond the City~s initial $83,000.00 appraisal. The likelihood of enhanced value being attributed to the loat development potential, as well as the consideration of the trial costa are fairly within the $22,000.00 value increase which Watt Development has agreed to. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement between Watt and the City, all coats, including litigation and judgment costs, are to be borne by Watt. It is recommended that the Council authorize the settlement of the above-entitled action for the Pull sum of $105,000.00, which such aum is to be ultimately funded by Watt. JLM:WPC/nlc N\131\MMCC