No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993/03/03 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. March 3, 1993 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 ### City Councilmembers Dennis L, Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Councilmember Charles J. Buquet, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Diane Williams, Councilmember ### Jack Lam, City Manc~er James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 PAGE City Council Agenda March 3, 1993 1 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these Items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The Ctly Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance (Flog Salute will be lead by Jr. Girl Scou} Troap 7160) 2. Roll Call: Baguet _, Alezander_,Stout _, Williams _, and Gufiertez- B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS i. Presentation of Proclamation declaring the week of March 7-13 as Girl Scoul Week in Roncho Cucamonga. ~ COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the Clty Council from addressing any Issue not previously Included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per Individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar Items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any Item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1 Approvol of Minutes: February 3, 1993 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/10/93 and 2/17/93; and 1 Payroll ending 2/ 11/93 for the totol amount of 51,158,319.18. PAGE City Council Agenda March 3, 1993 2 3. Approval of resolution adopting a Land Use/Transportation 10 Anarysis Program applying to proposed development -Council action to comply with the Congestion Management Program adopted by SANBAG in December 1992, as re4uired by Proposttion 111 (1990) RESOLUTION N0.93.036 12 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIiV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ADOPTING A LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR THE C!rv OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4, Approval of the lease Purchase of one (1) conventional truck 33 cob-chassis with regenerative air street sweeping Components from Dietrick International Truck Sales, Incorporated of San Bernardino. California, b the amount of 522,389,84 a year, for Me (5) years, to be funded ham Gas Tax Account 09-4647-7045. 5. Approval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract and 35 Lien Agreement from Uriel Graciano Sanchez, for the construction of alley improvements, located south of 26th Street. west of Center Avenue. RESOLUTION N0.93.037 36 A RESOLUTION OF THE CRV COUNCIL OF THE CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM URIEL GRACIANO SANCHE2 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME 6. Approval to execute Program Supplement No. 019 (CO 93-018) to 38 Local Agency -State Agreement No. OB-5420 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California for the construction phase Including advertisement, award and administration of the Rehabili}atlon and Widening of Haven Avenue from Chic Center Drive to Foothill Boulevartl. The Supplement sets the Federal portion of the project of rR346,152.00 and the City's portion of S44,B4B.00 with the provision to increase the City's portlon should The need arise. Funding for the Supplement Agreement shall be from Local Measure I Funtls. Account No. 32-4637-9112. PAGE City Council Agenda March 3, 1993 3 RESOLUTION NO.93-038 40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORVJNG THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 019 TO LOCAL AGENCY -SPATE AGREEMENT NO. 08.5420 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE INCLUDING ADVERTISEMENT, AWARD AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE REHABILITATION AND WIDENING OF HAVEN AVENUE FROM CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD 42 1. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12895, located on the west side of Baker Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route, submitted by Rancho Citilontl Development. RESOLUTION N0.93-039 45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIfJG IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12895 8. Approval to execute !mprovement Agreement Extension for 46 Tract 13851, located on the northeast corner of Wilson Avenue and Conistel Avenue, submitted by Pacific International Development. Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO.93-040 48 A RESOLIIfION OF THE CIN COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING !MPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECUROV FOR TRACT 13851 9. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 49 Tract 13945, located on the southeast corner of East Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Citation Builders. RESOLUTION N0.93-041 51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CIN COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNLA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITV FOR TRACT 13945 PAGE City Council Agenda March 3, 1993 4 10. Approval to Accept Improvements. Release of Bonds and Notice 52 of Completion for Parcel Map 11852, loca?ed on the sou?heasT comer of Utica Avenue and Anow Route. Release Faithful Pertonnance Bond: t Arrow Rou?e $680.000.00 tl'<on .o nt 301X70.00 Utica Avenue 206.000.00 RESOLUTION N0.93-042 53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CRY COUNCIL OF THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIf-0RNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMEMS FOR PARCEL MAP 11852 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 11. Approval to Accept Improvements, Release of Letter of Credit 54 and Notice of Completion for 10418 and 10438 V'rvienda Street. bcoted on vivienda Street west of Haven Avenue. Release: Fathful Pertonnanee letter of CredN 521.80.00 RESOLUTION NO. 93-043 55 A RESOLUTICN OF THE CRV COUNCIL OF THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FOR 10418 AND 10438 VIVIENDA STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK F ON ENT ORDINAN ~ The foilowing Ordirancea have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine end non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time withoUl discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any Item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION TO AMEND THE RANCHO CUCAMONCA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 12 08 BY ADDING SECTION 1208 025 TO PROVIDE EXEMPTIONS TO THE RE9UIREMENTS OF RIGHT-OF-WAV DEDICATION FOR SpE -IFI TV `; OF 9 DIN ~ RMITS PAGE City Council Agenda March 3, 1993 5 ORDINANCE NO.507 (second reading) 56 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ADDING SECTION 12.08.025 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO EXEMPTION OF STREETS AND HIGHWAYS DEDICATION F ADVERTL~ED PUBLIG HEARING^+ The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIROhM1 ENTAL ACCECh"ENT AND 1 57 . '~' OPMENT OD AM NDME 71.01 - GITV OF RANCHO ^d MON -.A - A request 10 amentl Tttie 17, Chcpter 17.12 of The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding parking requirements within shopping centers. Staff recommends issuance or a Negative Decbratbn. ORDINANCE NO. 505 (frtst reading) 132 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CIIY COl1NCll OF THE GRV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 92-01, AMENDING TfILE 17, CHAPTER 17.12.0E THE RANCHO C UCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING SHOPPING CENTER PARKING RE4UIREMENTS. AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 2, ~'OhSIDERATION OF Lljfl ITV 15ER'S TAX PROPOSAL 135 ({ PUBLIC HEARINGS The following Items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No Items Submitted. PAGE City Council Agenda March 3, 1993 6 H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following Items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public Input, No Items Sutxnitted. 1 COUNCIL BUSINESS The following Items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. .r IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only Identified for the nett meeting. K COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. Stale law prohibits the Cify Council from addressing any Issue not previously Included on the Agenda. Tha Clty Council may receive testimony and sal the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments ere to be limited to five minutes per Individual. I. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO SPECIAL MEETING WITH ASSEMBLYMAN FRED AGUTAR ON FRIDAY, MARCH 12, 1993, AT 7:30 A.M. IN THE TRI-COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE ROOM. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certity that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 25, 1993, seventy-two (M) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Febmary 3, 1993 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CO[JNCIT. MINUTES A regular mceting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on WWnesday, February 3, 1993, in the Courrcil Chambers o(the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Ddve, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting waz called m ceder at 7:04 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stour Present wqc Councilmembers: William 1. Akzandcr, Charles J. Buquet II, Rez Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L, Smut. Also present were: Jack Ism, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager, Rick Gomez, Community Development Director, Brad Buller, Ciry Harmer, Dan Coleman, Principal Planner. Beverly Nissen. Associate Planner, Jce O'Neil, City Engineer; Betty Miller, Associate Engineer; Bob Dominguez, Adminisuadve Services Director; Susan Neely, Finance Oflcer, Tony Flores, Management Analyst 1; Duane Baker, Assistant m Ne City Marutger, Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clerk; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner. Rancho Cucamonga Police Depannrent; and Debra ]. Adams, City Clerk •~~~r• B1. Presenmtion of Proclamations to C.E.R.T. members Mike Ryan, Don Chambers, Sandy Rizkowsky, Sheryl Igve, Mary Murphy, Casey tiles, 7ulie Becker, Robert Hague and Robin Parkison (or they assistaxe during die ^oods of ]anuary 7, 1993. Mayor Stout presented the Proclamations to everyone IisteA except Sheryl Love and Julie Becker. It was also mendoned That a proclamation needed to 6e preparrd for Tracy Ryan for her assistance, •~~~~. No communication was mark from the public. arr~~• City Council Minutes Febnrary 3, 1993 Page 2 Dl. Approval of WartanLS, Register Nos. I/13N3 and 120N3; and Payroll ending 1/14N3 for the tool amount of 52,120,273.40. D2. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale Beer & Wine for Shop N Go, Debra R. and Robert A. Lakees, 10110 Foothill Boulevard. D3. Akoholk Beverage Appliration for On-Sale Gerkral Eating Place for Zendejas Mexican Restaurant, Eduardo Zcndejas, 7945 Vineyard Avenue, #D7. D4. Akoholk Beverage Application for On Sale General Eating Place for Backwaters, Backwaters Incorporated, 10877 Foothill Roulevard. ITEM PULLED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMDER BUQUET. D5. Alcoholk Devemge Application fu On Sale Beer & Wine Eating Place for China Garden, Peggy and Lunn Trang, 9770 19th StrceL D6. Approval of request by the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce to waive Ne City's Banner Fee N conjunction with the annual Business and Community Expo. D7. Approval of Development Review No. 92-11 -Davis, an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision b requve a Community Trail in conjunction with the consouctlon of a single family house totaling 7,600 square tees on 16.6 acres o(Iand in dte Open Space District and Very Low Residential District (up m 2 dwelling units per acre), located at 9400 Almond Sveet -APN: 1061-491-01. ITEM PULLED BY CHARLES DOSKOW. RESOLUTION N0.93-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI{E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 92-II FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 7,600 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ON 16.6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT 9400 ALMOND STREET IN THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS [N SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1061-091-01 DR. Approval to execute agreement (CO 93-008) with Chaffey Joint Union High School to use Altu Loma High School Gymnasium for the City-sponsored Youth Basketball Leagues. D9. Approval m execute agreement (CO 93-(NN) with Chaf(ey Joint Union High Scheol to ace Etiwanda High School Gymnasium fm City-sponsored Adult Basketball amt Adult Volleyball Leagues. D 10. Approval to ezecme agreement (CO 93-010) between the City and Cha(fey College to use the Gymnasium for Pep Day Event on Febnrary 13, 1993, to include rental contract, hold harmless, clean-up and security agreements. DI 1. Approval to czccute the Arthritis Foundation Joint Efforts Co-Sponsorship Agreement (C093-011), D12. Approval to execute Profassional Services Agreements with Ficldman, Rolapp & Associates (C093-012), Brown, Divert & Henlschke (C093-013), and GFB-Friedrich & Associates (CO 93.014) in relation m a request by Masi Commerw Cenkr Partners to (otm an assessment dtalricL City Council Minutes Febrttary 3, 1993 Page 3 DI3. Approval In execute a Reimbursement Agreement (CO 93.015) with Masi Commerce Center Partners and Masi Rochester Associates m cover consaltant costs associated with a proposed assessment disvic[ as requested by dte developu. D14. Approval to ezceule Improvement Agreement Extension (or Tract 13303, located on the souNwesl comer of Terra VisU Parkway and Mounuin View Drive, submitted by Lewis Ilomes. RESOLU77ON NO. 93-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13303 DI S. Approval m accept [mpmvements, Release of Bonds and Nofice of Completion for Test 13858, located on the southwest coma of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street. Release: Faithful PUformance Bond (Street) 5262,739.00 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond(Street) 26,274.(16 RESOLUTION N0.93-02I A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTBdG THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PoR TRACT' 13858 AND AUTHORIZING T}¢ FII,ING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: MoveA by Gutiemex, seconded by Alexandu to approve the Consent Calendar with the exceptlmr of Items D4 and D7. Motion carried unanimWSly, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D4. AlcnhMic beverage Application fur On Sale General Eatinq Place for Backwaters, Backwaters Incorporated, 10877 Foothill Boulevard. Councilmember Buyuet stated he objected to this alcoholic beverage application because of the problems the City has had with that cstablishmenL James Markman, City Atlomcy, stated dte City can protect this m the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (ABC), but that the City does not have jurisdiction oru the ABC. MOTION: Moved by Baque6 seconded by Stout to have a Icttu drafted by the City Atlomcy to the Alcoholic Beveage Control Board regarding the acdvity going on at Backwaters and staling the City Council is protesting their application. Councilmembu Alexander smted this was the lust time he has ever heard anyNinK about this. Capt. Zeiner, Police Departmenq stated there are wncems about Ne activitles going on at Backwaters, especially what occurs on Sunday evenings. He mentioned that the dismptive behavior is cecurting after the patrons leave Backwaters when they close fur the evening. He stated he, Dennis Michael and Bmd Buller have met with the Backwaters management and that they are willing m assiu the City with lhrs problem. City Council Minutes February 3,1993 Page 4 Mayor Smut stated according m Smte law the ABC is required to notify the Ciry of their appbcation, and felt the City should let them know there is a problem. Councilmember Alexander stated it then: is a problem at this esmblishment. that possibly the City could pull Neu Clllenalnmenl pertnlL Councilmember Buqum stated by the Council sending a letter of its concerns this woWd hopefWly flag this w ABC. Mgion caroled 4-I (Alexander troy. .rrrrr DISCUSSION OF ITEM b7. Approval of Development Review No. 92-11 - Duvis, an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to require a Community Trail in conjunction with the construction of a single family house totaling 7,600 square feet o0 16.6 acres of land in the Open Space District and Very Low Residential D'rstriet (up to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at 9400 Almond Street - APN: 1061-491.01. Councilmember Buquet stated Ite would not be voting on this because he was not present at Ore last meeting m hear Ore discussion. Mr. IlnSkoW, attorney fm the Davis', stated he utMerstood the action of two weeks ago was m requve We trail m be built immediately, but it didn't get to the root of the trail matter. He stated the Davis' have concerns about what came out of tlro last meeting. They were cprcemed about the'v ability ro drive on the veil because this would affect Orern getting access m the southwestern portion of the'v property. He smtW they would like this clarified so Orey are allowed ro drive on the trail. He added when the property m the wets is developed it would be possible ro mn Ilw veil across the souherly part. He stated since Ure last mceung his clients have talked to many of Ne people who spoke m the last meeting and that Urese people (clt the Davis' were against Ure riders, m wanted m close the trail, which he stated was not true. He added the people the Davis' M.ve talked ro have stated they really don't have a creed to tike the current route, that going across the southerly route would I>e adequate so they are rrot incertupiM. He slated Ney would like some kind of understanding so that in the future when the vacs is developed the possibility of relocating that exists. He stated they would like that presumably to be wish the consent of the equestrian interest involved and would like this incorpomtcd into the Resolution. He felt it should be noted that the easement will be granted, but that it could be traded oft at some point when the southerly improvements along Almond are developed. He felt the veil as proposed would take from the Davis' without twmpertsation az a condition for development He stated the Davis' are rot being given permits to finish the tern because it is tied ro this issue and tell this waz unfav and a change of what the City's petition has been. He asked Nat what waz original ly signed when the barn waz started with mgards m the easement still 4 considered valid. Mayor gloul stated this item is trot a public hearing end it the Cily Council warns m further discuss this matter, it would need W be rcadvertised. He asked the Council what Ueu pleasure was. Councilmember Alexander slated he would like input tram the other people that spoke at the last meeting it Ote Council is m decide on something other than what was agreed on ac Ore last meeting. Mayor Stout asked why are there additional permits required fm the completion of the barn if there was already a permit issued for this. City Council Minutes February 3, 1993 Page 5 Brad Buller, City Planner, sated there was an application for a building permit this past week that requested what is railed a "mare motel", and stated this u the fast time staff has seen this request that it did not originally come with the bam. He stated it is to the south o[ the bam. Councilmember Williams stated she would like m sec the nail go in along with any additional conswcuon of anything. RESOLUTION N0.93-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALtFORNA, CONDTTIONAL.LY APPROVWG DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 92-11 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 7,600 SQUARE FOOT S WGLE FAMB.Y RESIDENCE ON 16.6 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT 9400 ALMOND STREET W THE OPEN SPACE DISTRICT, AND MAKWG FINDWGS W SUPPoRT THEREOF- APN: 1061-091-O1 MOTION: Moved by Gmiermz, secorrdW by Stout to approve Resolution No. 93-019. Modon carried 4-P-0-1 (Baguet abstained). Mayor Stoul added the issue of whether the "mare ham" should or should no[ have that condition is nor before the Council mnight. •~.~.. EI TO MILLiKFN A m• AND A C Fn tulT OF 4 h HON TIWAN A At N m FROD C 1F T AVENUE TO 24TH CTRFFT Debra 1. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 5(16. ORDINANCE N0.506 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 506. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. •r~~~• City Cooncil Minutes February 3, 1993 Page 6 Fl. FNVIRONMFNTAI AC CFCCM NT AND NTAT(V TRA T Ibllfi WI IAM rre,r COMPANY - An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving a residential subdivision of 19 single family IeLC on 4.09 aces of land in dte I.ow Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located souJl of Highland Avenue, west of the Deer Creek Channel - APN: 107(x61-03. Associated with this application is Trw Removal Permit 91-2R. (Continued from January 20, 1997) Stiff report presented by Beverly Nissen, Associate Planner. Chief Mictutel, F'ue District, sated the proposals submitted by the applicant do na meet the intent of the C.neml Plan in dealing wiN the 600 foot culde-sac length maximum requirement. Brad Buller, City Planner, sorted the only thing the knuckle plan does na address's it provide for emergency access, but that it does not provide direct street access as a secondary means of ingress and egress. Councilmember Gutia~ez asked if any of the plans submitted would meet the 600 (oot cal-de-sac pmbkm. Chief Michael, Fire Distric4 stared Inch Planning and the Fia District prefer m go wim the original plan because of the circumsmnces wiN the CAO fed cul-0e-sac. Councilmember Gutiemz slated he felt Option A would he azcepmble, but is now hearing it would na satisfy the 600 tool requirement. He stated he decided b appeal Nis because he felt there was cmrcem by the neighbors. He stated he rcalius that the City Courrcil does trot favor the exccgion of a Tong cal-de-sac. He realized consistency was a key factor. He felt Santa Clam Coup is unique because [Faye were vpy few homes m that streq as compared m me suers above it. He wooled to avoid shared driveways and avoid extra hardscape by only having two loll. He sated that was important m him. Mayor Stout smted he agreW that shared driveways should be avoided at all costs. Mayor Stout opened the mceting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council were: Brian Austin, representing me William Lyon Company, stated either option would concern them because of the noise factor due m the emergency access and also the proposed freeway going in. He fell dte Planning Commission's decision was probably dte best design considering all the options available. He felt the three homes at the end of the cul-de-sac on Sanm Clara would be consistent with other culde-sacs. He stated dre shared driveway notion was one that they could live with in order to try m mitigate some of the concern about the hardscape. He stated they pm(ertpl not to do this, but would if they had M. He sated they are willing to work with the homeowners on (heir concerns, but would like to have the project approved as recommended by dw Planning Commission. lce Cusamano, 1096R Sanm Clam Court, slated he would like the City Council to approve only two homes nn the cal-de-sec. He felt if there were to be three homes at the end of dw street, the shared driveway approach would be the but way m go. Philip Tulore, 10961 Santa Clara, asked if Councilmembcr Buquet would be able m vote on this maker. Councilmember Buquet smled he would not be able to vote because he has nM read Ne minutes for Nc previous mceting, City Council Minutes February 3, 1993 Page 7 Mr. Tulore stated he E tepresentlng the residents, and that they did not like Ne three homes ae dte end of the culde-sac. He tell Uuee driveways at the end of dte sweet would completely hardscape dte culde-sac. Maurice Marston, Lot 47, stated there are not curb markings for sewer wnnections, and stated he did na want m have throe homes at the end of the street Jerry Jacobson, 10935 Santa Barbara Court, aked when the City adopted the 600 foot eW-0e-sac rule. Mayor Stout stated in 1989 when the General Plan was adopted. Mr. Jacobson fell the City was going back on a "deal" that was made in 1988 since the General Plan waz not adopted until 1989. He asked that the City Council vote in favor of the people who signed the pennon. There being no further response, dre public hearing was closed. Mayor Stout recapped what was before the Council to consider and the testimony given. He asked it any of the configu2uons presented were acceptable to the City Council. Councilmember Alexander stated he had no problem upholding the Planning Commission's decision. Councilmember Williams stated she consumed with Courtcilmember Akzander, but felt the three lots with shared driveways would be accepUble, Mayor Stout stated if the neighbors o(shared driveways do not get along, they will tort work. Councilmember Williams stated she wW Id go with die Mayor's expertise on this and Say no shared driveways. Councilmembcr Gutierrez sorted he did not know why something couldn't be done to make everyone happy. He sorted he had to go with two homes on the bottom street. Councilmember Williams asked if the Council vows Pot three homes on the bottom sneer and the neighbors come up wish a new plan, can they come back to the Council with Heir idea Bmd Buller, City Planneq stated yes. Mayor Stout stated he agrred with the Planning Commission's decision, to deny the appeal wish a modification that the shared driveway on Santa Clara be removed, RESOLUTION N0.93-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCII. OF 'f HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT 14116, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 19 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 4.09 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, WEST OF DEER CREEK CHANNEL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 107661-03 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to deny the aIB~ with the deletion of all shared driveways. Mdion carried 3-I-0-1. (Gunenez vaed no, Btpuel abstained). City Council Minutes Febnwy 3, 1993 Pege 8 •rA1r• Gl. CONSID RATION TO A ND RAN HO I AMON A MlINI IPA COD C TION I2 04 1IOA 2 a AND 12 04 Olfe AND REVEALING SECTI N 7204 050 PERTAINING TO ACTIVITIES AT THE AD n T SPOR OMPLEX Della 1. Adams, City Clerk, read the flee of Ordinance No. 505.8. Smtt mpat presented by Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager. Discussion followed by the Council mgarding the proposed Ordirattee. Mayor Stout called a rccass a[ R:52 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:04 p.m. with all Councilmembers preSGrt. rgpr Linda Daniels. Depury City Manager, sated a represenmfive of the applicant is withdrawing rhea request (or alcohol and that staff recommends that Ordinance 505-B be tabled at this time. ORDBJANCE NO. 505-B (lust reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.4MONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTION 12.04.OIOA.2.a AND 12.04.OIOB AND REPEALING SECTION 12.04.050 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE MOTION: Moved by Stou4 seconded by Alexander to accept the applicant's withdrawal of the alcoholic beverage request. Mmion carticd unanimously, 5-0. rrrrrr H. CITY MANAGF•R'S STAFF REPORTS No items were suhmittrd. •rrrrr 11, DISCUSSION OP CITY COUNCIL COMMISSION TERMS AND SCHEDIn 1NG OF COMMISSION MEETINGS Staff report presented by Diane Q'Ncal, Management Analyst II. Mayor Stout sated he has noticed from Ne Commission minutes, with the exception of dre Planning Commission, That the Commissions could possibly gG away with not mceting as frequently as they have been. He felt each Commission should be reviewed m the subcommittee level. Conncilmember Buquct referred to the David M. Griffith Study done in 1992 and stated he is cor~cemed with the amount of staff Gme spent on the Commissions and the cost involved. He added he is especially concerned with the Public Safety Commission bccanse of the information in the study. City Cowcil Minute February 3, 1993 Page 9 Mayor Stour felt the number of commLcsioners should be looked at and also the items they are dealing wiN. He felt a policy or structure should he made about then maucrs. He stated he would like the meeting fregcericy m also be looked at with the possibility Ihat the Commissbns could call special meetings as necessary. He added the number of Commissioners on each Commission should be looked at also. He continued to suggest that a po:iey be developed when an informational item is requested by a Commissioner ac opposed to those that need m he on an agenda and disused. Courtcilmember Buquet tell some of the services the Commissions perform could he consolidated into another Commisia. He did not think S] million spun[ a Commisia support was acceptable. Mayo Suwt suggested Ihat this item Come hack m the entire Council on March 3, ]993 fm Nrther diuusion. The City Council concurred that the present Commissioners wmtld serve until they am reappointed or they resign. .u~r• I2, Sta(t report presented M' Linda Daniels, Deputy Cancilmember 6uquet klt a charge per head shard be made which he felt would provide for beder connol over the entire parking matter. Maya Stou! stated this would generate revenue m o(tset maintenance costs also. He asked if Ihere was a casensus 6y the Council m charge for parking with the local sports groups being exempt from dte charge. Councilmemba Buquet suggested the adults and the Little League users be provided one pass for they season, i.c., City organir¢d activities. Linda IYaniels, Deputy Ciry Manager, slated what she is hearing the Council say is that They prefer Option 1. Councilmember Gutierrez felt if Here were any special events, i.e., Little League mumamen[s, they should charge for periling. Mayor Smut suggested that major uses of that park be scheduled around the baseball team's uhedule so them are no conflicts. Linda Daniels, Deputy City Manager, sated John l.eCwnpte is providing her wiN a uhedule m help determine this, and that this will 6e diuussed with Community Services m work around those conflicts e9 much as possible, ACTION: The Ci[y Council concurred on Alternative 1 in concept, with derails to be worked out Por exempt groups. •~rr~• No items were identified (or the nest meeting, .~~~~~ City CouncR Minute February 3, 1993 Page t0 No communication was made fmm tlw puhlic. .~~~.a MGTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to adjourn to Executive Session m discuss personnel mailers, property negotiatrons and a seulcmcnt proposal. Mouon carried unanimously, 5-0. 71te meeting adjourned at 9:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra 1. Adams, CMC City Cledc Approved P -NP -' I V!1 =;0 ilo 00 ! ON6 J 6 9 V• G/ ~ ~ ~ ~L~ ~i iai ~. :i: i si ~• •O• •i~ •P• ~< 1>• o aamNh.oNeoNmNNNppeam•mleeFpeNNOOeaohlepp OOON aaPfNNOaP0010 NONrNP000POVOFNNOrpNNONN a era ew1- ~i.~.o ion .~~~n ie~=ilnH~~~nsw~~m o.~.~ilnrei • N NaNNI ra NOPLNamN ONaprNO POVPNNFNN m m .. f~N ., . r1. i nr r m .. r r ., fNN~.PIrfPOm•POhLPOrNm•NVMfPOnl NlilaNOr.PONNmaNphOPONry/1 OMeOPOPPPPPPPP0000000000wrrrr NNNNNNNNNmNmm mNIIA NmmVV aaaf a•I~I~I~aaa a•1 •••a ••11••a•1•111•IIV•a•a••••IIIa1•IIVIIa•aa••II•1•a• OwPrvhMnFhwwPh'.hhhPMMNPhNMMNhhMPhhPPhMMhhnlPhhhhNMryFn 1 1•I L Ill O P •P • a . {mm O O N a h hOnPN hll0 P •V • • •\Oal W fP \PO \N NN\ J •In M NmmMN O 7\ NP frNhO mN Wa[ J WJNM LN a 1\aWN fNa•1 • h9via 1 LaYm\ _ •OryN aW Nmlf \ _ <N f•LiOin00 VIV V 'JVVwj tJ• LLPLiOL • OhOW L=•iLOM IYVa N OJ NY •WIOh h• ry<rylh• ViMV V if •hWa NWa hL •VI" !Ol•tN •YhJr jVh YOJ Z V MOVNOO uL ihL N!N h`N•r N PV •J hMii NOWiWi Z hlhJNi!•inihh Yif > N N fOJlrilNWhlO! SJJ VYYfO 2 'JJ~YU P 2 of Nf U O WJh2 WVN P _ !~ NiN Y6 O a wtY i • fl ••Yi JW iWh Th h P V MflVf IY Ol1~1NWNN•YfYrr p • 1+ ~ ~ nu~W g.u orl~~ .hi olaaz Iz srN PhnN oWrWiff:„ r shfl~ faf rPOlhaW fJ<NJ 1 OOVO w0 f91[a NIJIaOJi00NVOWN WWNNW ~OJNNWWfW~~ i hl 00 OJOhMYJ ihiNMNi h O J•i>'JhOh i \WWi i0 y Nii! fNJ •OirWJJNhi PNJNNO[pihiNN N Na'J• N NNOOOhJri hlM ia• JN TVN•O W NN 6 UJ fP y:fMLli000 Se~~fJ aLJ'JZ <PMJNS<Ytff wf ww ijNiW~~Nni>LaO<Wf_ OtNNO•• YtYUhi00hLi\ VJ U nJ0 JNNf\JJNMf CWVUiN <jVOWwUOJVOMOnJV•OJO_J O_O_ N J OWJS YmJh• WJi• Nf<hNUNiVUNiJliVif<NIWV y OHO NIaYiNYLLfif>rZOiMM>OMN>JNN'J rJOhPhONhN9~J W LL > NiSt frNW~YY~hO~lN~W1~~>aZGOL!}~Y~YrN6~t>~)i6 V i V J O i W °z u V N i 1= uu r i • ! o o~.i. JhJ u s O4 N Yi h i• i O hN• W>i • N 2 L V <Op Y ~ti to J M V uuOi lOi N11>i of i ooi W hOhO W L i ii JJ hOV 9N O lOf V Y V a NNW V7N i Ji V f h f V>UO > N J f •JW'J WMtJl LW >Z Fi V w yi0 Y ~ • iii p Nif JWrU• ii O iYN i r W W ViMfPIN J PwWrJ i• MiJYi _W YNN J p WVr N V LY: O<Oy •WUl9PJfOaN N•Wy: M16W1 •W6 NN W1L»NJOJ N Wf•WOl a00LN y O !'J i aVfJf fiJOVf ~=NiFFIi e0 MWShJ• rarfN • ft• WO rh NO_f• >JLU• N VNO'fJ • ~ OiOJ YhOOhVhY00~~! WN~•<ViN if 3if7 •i iOW ~Ni O O• !'J OiLJJYVSNiNNhL NNY •W JiaW ii •NY> W JYJW W~IWWJDJOf V Nr yp5 •JW .r1 YNOOWfOWW M V YINi JhYJ/1Wr~hrWWh~YNNYMYN~JfiVJlOWlili•iNhVW i M i•i0 •ffUVJJJiiiOllM99ff•WWWNrDOIh fff•SNOO V l P 7L70 1•ffffff•fffffffff10f 000OpOf OfOUVYUYUVUU < wPrN MILNNnwIOIOYPNaANIM.PININImP•TIIP.PIN OMNaL P m• pM TJL NmmNmwIN M.N m h N N rvF mh~MNnmmNhNr N NrN h hN NhIi1F hN 1 ui an N.P. N~enaeo ao°e<nmeo e~eeiaeee°Oe+eoeeoe~e•ose °e .°. °r eo eo o.a•.a. e0 e0 ee ee eo NnyP<rv NNNahNNnN000N„^Nr 01l Nan oONaO •POONNaNw •N r0 wPNNP ON ahOM1ONNPmrv r nNr.•rrv w a N NN N NN r r• a Oryaa nNr n w a P _Nw 1 O<w fN €9° tW0 f O ONp ~anaM1<werv«•NaM1<PeNrynaNaw<PerNmaN•h<worNna N~ohewew«naN m^^::SSSSSSSSY+iiiaSiSiiii+ ywwM1M1hw<iw « .i•.i S$53339i~iaaaaaaaa aaa OwwwM1FhMMnwPwNwhM1hhM1M1M1whwNMM1PrhnhMwrFM1M1rhMhhM1wwrwM1NM1 O10 • 1 < O < ! O • wW< Z• im N y n V 1 h \ OM1 h Nnj P • ' Wa N !P Nn<nm wYw1\> N nP~ • N h Uh ON N • hj JJPP OOwW NZn\\ i J N np W WW W ~I~y\w nm~rvNN mnM1pPp1\N NY <O f Vip WW _JV Np O<O iU M •wNN \\O w! \<M~'1N •Y iON y >i_ ~f y OOy ZW < N•UWW ~\hUpy \•W NpN Zm SfW O WJ Y W « i ! NH p. : OP ? _< OJOY yW NpJ LMMpW Nm IW jnl \ NSZ OOr~P OW 60Z <J O_ JIII ppnlp• JV\OU IPN M1UJ W >WrYO\ W Zf yV •i yWPOOiY p•urhVa J f O•[Wy \ ONNOiW JW USNnOp~ill~iYi IOS\YW <UJ Oi0 W •/61OJ y_N JZ NHN iWy VWWiWWJ ON ONihVNVM• y<N hUJJW> <J~ i0 Z i>lOwiiMNNy•Z F_ NOjyiyNhJM OZi Z WpYJN• NJpNWi '9hIy0iY yWWiffZMi M OYNVJjJ LLls WOZwuO j<iNpW YJ~JVWF<JZYOOf.,,lJpjpt WZp9 J:M:WV V ty fyiyZp F S ! O'J piiOW YVZOO i ihOhO~ S tWZ NiOW W YYWOV> O<NYW OiONN OOZYOFI<O=OMONN O 4>O w~ y•[OLL IL Z>W SSW <P iii WWi <LL Si NW ONOOf UNYOWpYJY<Y ••JYVpOOy'I •f \NVNWJ<W Ui VWZaZW 9!<Ii7<WYiY iYNpMi<YNNNipWNesW N UYiy L6W _ IOINY VO<WJiWUaJMO y<>•• M)i0 WI• M)FNNWiNhWU i p :WOJ: W1~Wi<Lf WfY<Z< fWWYNOWO NpLU j1{O w~ ~1 •pf NV• YpOOWJfW VJJfWZ!• OW NWWWNSO<O )h SY>Y~ Ni>VtplOfiOiw)WOM»)LLpyiWWP>09V•f0>Oi0)1l J F J V h < N >V O~ O O 9< V 2 i y i JO U W NOi V ii i O N pN i fir Or > J _V ~JJVNJ WOiNWiWW• NY ViJ W I fJ~~>p <r >Wi0 „ r< Ni < y O p Ny N r0<t W N yZJIiiON<i iir OJ SV ~O Ow• OLY J:W ~Zr3NYiMZV Jni/ N^ii•WS ~tW>1L ii <f VI iYJWi VVi• i W O!, N<=<r 1iOWWiI NIN NOn •O h'IN O<W<iNVW lurii ONjO N:_ <Yr NO y Ow • OiOi• iJ><W<NYJ O <N Mi Wri yW WW!<iW i~~!<O• WIZ O<Oh SCOW iYJiO• •O•j09r>i0 ih Pr<~ji ONiMO i ON((iiN ~<iiO •L• O( .Z >N i< J y1 Vy11 F1 ~~ZOYZIi ~JM I~rM1NY mYHLSYOyWOiO<~W~<iiiY JW<OiM~WMyWWN• iipi7< yJi>JJiFYpNY WRr9JYiiZiWWWWJfi>JJ6N9> « 01 yy yy00i7 O« <WWMWOi1YJJNfWWWO<MOOiiy« WW000000 !i• YVVV VOOOpO0000WWWwwY1lW WILVYVUUYOI2LI2I2i2irMNl 'n OmaaPr PawOONharmPwNlnhOrOM1raN1NwNNPwwJhaaNYNUO NOOONF <IN< 'ia0<mNawa00r~h<M1a<<NM1w•a.Ohw<wnNar<aaw NN JnmN PN w N la•1w mNNPmNmNnmPP m NPnN NJMN PA m 2 • aNeeNOmseNOePmNeoeomomomooN miii eeh ennree~°n:eom mrP-°eoOeonn.P.~cep oe eawoeNOa.e}oDO.}boNOmoaNPNem .~NeeNmarNeNraNm.rP~ra~eNmy.~ Nririo yaw rp~maOa00NTwp±=Owrymmmnm••P ON:Oaj r \• N ~ N N~< N F N r F i V `FP a !ry ~DO o.N.n JY V LL ~D t4 •V •! •W :N NbhIPOrONmfnahOPOrNmaNbh.wOrNmaNa}<POrNmINa wi~iY~ajaP~~ii~nY•:9in~~N•Q 9iNMNMNNrN nrN PNm DFFhhrf n~rhhh}hnhhFhhhhhh~hhNhhhhhtrFti}M}n}}hh}h±nMn Y V •• • > • • •\• f ••• OA J N P• NP• V HN o N P \\ =^ N pm Nh Y P NO O N' n Ni n aaP \F h0 N Y PM O O P NT• ON ONN \ r N \ •\ nNrhN P •N W NN '• • hr\ V\UWfO ZF •W\ N>F ~ i i •~ h• • h •wN FNJLLhW OY N9JLLNi•Vn VD • N •\_w w UI Dab a6r V O N VI !M M O •ViN OpNYON •Vilf JW Jf NY _ N6 N_IJ J I }y W•12 JOJ UV I } 1 = :Nnl NJF JL a LNN IMW ON FV •s l/<YpfY •a ww Nr OWPaNNyM WONPN y •s1YY NNN el OWIWW~IJJ =YDONNYJDi =y0 i j1:i104WOWOWJ 776 N !NC LL•O •6 M~iJ {•06 sh O Y iZOYbJ• NOFU 2 WOCwJiW Wpi f•h•• }~ i JYwWw10 • W „ ILOMwwfOwM1O » LL NN•YW'J TINY O•Y\i WWYfWON~hY.INU^LLN\ e~W=rNyroNNN DiN o<YNDy~ a oNO PuoNri iN o„h ~ a f FYNDZ NOON ~> „W7YYW = O Y Y }_ W }hYV ` WM :h_D_h_ h_ YJOYiVNfW~Wh ~ V G<OWWO JV Jw•2n>JJ ywJJ IIOYiy: fWy W J WO YULLWVWGS:•J pl:i OphYJWNWNiNWIY NJ•LlwN O} iOSON02N:Of ti)OGO :=OY V~OlP `ON>IN Ni:V^PN SON V tiW>\f I )Nw ShPW i Z.i <VfV ••W •f VYW <O VV OWfyYY00•W IY rJV!••~j•YNDhWVY<M1= J OYFNFSYSJ NNFFiNNYIiY ViLLOY OJV2 SOG •rM V SSNYi<J> SY}YNW9iiY}MYY • Y•ON•jhSNM16h W<NNNW bJ pYNWf <OJLL~WWJJWiWOY • ~J II IIV)NW<NN 06wLL » ;}O~~ WWNJ! JONW >~J O>pJJOOiWN\OS>J:=~ LNOYJiYJWCOVYNLiOiDI>}OYP`NhOOYJlFOOL :: V S N M l s Y ~ iG j < Y SS V ~»Y N 3• J M ww •OnM } 22< yJ Oi N N }} ZY l :LL YJ)NN N <farv \J Ni ON} t O OV=Ni~iNF20} n }ZW O•ViN ::•[ MNJ VY.Y}W JN• eNh<YILiY} •O Z• '• ~J JWN VY } ONVZYN OYWZi<ZN jlY_i<WUJ> s 0_O_• N uYW ~ < f W=~:jN WO\YiZ N< lOVMy» MY6'__ Wr O p f OZ }JZ VNNI O~i!• V4NV >00} Z ZVO Z}W N NOV:9WiV0 NS„7tiJ •1 •N!>1'ZJ wD 02pD ^ O!<MW F 'O•{ ZWW}Z YJ1 i•. JJYNWJYN N Z VO IIYjW • < pOYi6NNOWl <QN<YN<W<W•OONWij JN< V 2 •J<[N < • VOfN O V i NSWJlVNJ •INNN<! ~J OOWw~N> Y< ! yZyN SVZiY •NS yWWOjOViJiDNW• J <1•!!• JW S~NN<}J~YDYOV.•J>N<i2f~JiNVVOe•YZYfNVaiVlY(NJOF}}Ip Z111 u Of fffWNNJtlOZY<\\<ff W000><1 « f<P<VVVNNppOOOif\NOlZ llY•t•[1trt YYY•{ZZZZJJJJJJJJJJJ[S![[ii![!S[tOf[S[!!2Sl00 PNPNIIOmOPN•aYNYNZ•••PNNMOOONNNPNOIm<NONaNhNMph}Obh• NNMFINM<NPNwNNNYPN P=NYNOONPNNVhMNMhNPNNOMNw N1•1NfhON PmNI1NN Tl•IPN wr0•}U NNmN PNwNaP NPN PNNNNNPTPPawm11a1P NN n 3 2 V iNs ~:~ urn ZOO VLLO f00 Oj6 _T r V p E. 9 E :E m:= P• N• •Z= W• ~ O• ~ Z• J~ ~ P• •O• •Z• a:~sae~e~oosz..mosee°o:~s NOaNPI1w~~01POOneaNPNOYFmnOh N an ryry.awNN fr ~.. nnw .n°eNaeNNO~ oaehNOheeNeN nneNNO~oaeNaemonnnrv N NPmhwwml•.. ma.I na.a r. a w nn 1 N J w t N JPOPO:ry•nanahYPOwNnaNaM1OP O.p. ~Npn •i na.MyNnIN<he n.INahOPOw wv,n~tn N.<~X~ri7!•n .7 Y.SMti.N.a.NnnNNNNnNwa..°..°,I.NC,N MGn:.N...°.MNN~N.°, YYIRNU'i°„ VIIaV11aV•Va11•1111VIaa•VIIViVaaV•I..VIa1V1• OhhnhhhhhNNNhNI~hThhhNhNNPNhhhhhh M.. laFhw.~wlaNMlaPhn.. a.h Mp Y Yp IYYp Y h .\i hS\ N O ~oNw .n [ • PZWn i 1J.. ~. • NO Pf9NM1F J \ . WJV000 nP l•e.Wa VNY Yfm~N mNriN TJJ Ji WPJOPT NNON NON ff0 NW•aPfOYiO1p.M PpWpNO JMp wN[Npa OFi i W M1O =p„ a I.POtla~Yo~=N rW:M.O pNLL I ..JP[OiF ~i N FO ryM a 1.• <owufJ„e~a hhwNa JFJ~: O ZOOM p NrWhfW fiO aCyF.NOW WNNN P VwV N WS'JLL 'JOW p9i70• lVaaVpOaafl =ONOWON r»Jp \JJOfaW MWPfi h 010 a? nJ:f0=6:=raPJOpO MN wOMOWON Ja90NWaVJIN .2V IP [n IIW YONa>rW 0_J ahMP ~J YiF.IN SONS SSYN~WS Uh~OTWYryw OW.F.Wp ~O hh =pTWh pW.1-xs~r osa:per •~! [YOaiNfVaY•hYi\fJY<Yf WfWaO OOx NUhiNfN hN WpWiONpOpYpw hOtiW Tf fW2uYrJhaVrYWYTtlNaN a Y:.'..~°'~°N"::.°.:S.o~:S~vW~Yi\'su}.shoua ViVrONiJiNi.pp'fOaO.pONOiNw V Nh • i FTW V °i~ w oV[ 2 J M wiW i r°J HJpN f O. N a ZI`Of V` J NwW Oi N3W} N V O V_Z _WJ }NO •VVO V Y QWh Or VNNN Y i ~ fha SWN Op StlpJ 20 J 7h .W pp JJJ N\OV01.a NV J ~ WjWHJVOpOUJ.YiNipfN000~.h0H Va f NNZtlJaJOYYUNY2 NNVVUJMJOMWV W ONpF.O.Owpi UOWW. i7 O V hMOiON>NNri} V.NOrdii}. OW\a h.TZM FV FiION •atiM19..WYN JWVO YhOf i .O YN. WWWFpwrpJJ WiWOOpw }pFWfeN yL N}.f rNJtlOIM JWNff UVSp06hi1[N9iejJOWY>OTiii}fittlVV 6\ppsOpa6p[tlrratltltliYaNNNNNNNNNN 1! J' ! ! a iN iWY\ \ h i0.1NLVti n\r .rl Y N PNpWrNM O NG \ O V •u JUp.vl V YJ WOM \! wVWZY~wOaPOWa \V OJNiOW[w0 ryOJZN OW Otl~GJVOINWNWON~w ~O aaaui~.Winw°p i.T+W Ye~N~~ >Oh>ONiNi IhOON w NWf91Npa[W pf OrN OSNWNSWOfvO1L[N ~p W mmYS .h.~W~rpiaioowp°o. OpY>Zrr\MOV>6.aMN~NO nr. FfMh. L06rhNJJTh WWTOaWWWWHw>.JJtlJO n>puhTSrtltlaptloapuaph N O J 0 p _O U O N ee J p a N Z V • Z .V fU O Y !O M N NONfWON 00 f2000JW rf JMpV~ aoiWaWaal >:orvuuw NZapN NNN P ZOal.h4av iiN~ij~i°a~ tlia.NiNai u uuuoa .o Jtlutlf osu LaW tliWO~~ooovi J~u WU°iW WZifp SpFONNJ .OPV fhiYiMhti.Yl Ni~iilWLf OfT~ 'J9.W of ffi~tl[O.wONiJ NNNNNNNNNNhMM1hhh~J>Z MPNNNPIN rynONNNINNaNpONNONTP NPNOf OIaNIpInNPPaVaO NONPahN•N w11N•YaTNP•hMNOmPPw~. nYnNNNPm101nPa00NNN NNOIO ..Nha NNaNNOaNN 1aNMNONaYan..ON1apNT ..nN .y Mn ryn ON n0 N.1 O ..Y nnNNnNNnO NO mN 4 V_ v fhl yew F~ 00 J~ EE E ~i iii i ii ai m::omae~~::N~eeeee NmnONPFNan NIr.PN ~ihwheaaNwNaemlN N w .. m a JwPTPPPPPOCwCNmVNCa Ny OCPOn NiOO«~00«<O O N n hhhhhhhhhhNhhh SNf• !Of f+ O ! f ha ~ ih h \. \ NN ~H N wri YiWm i1pYP i-W N\ N! as W wYNry JhNJ fNlf J PV6V Ofd ZVNYV N • hilJ• at~Yi wNs Y OOOW~J JOf~p ~iN P OOYVY eJ1pJ pJW iJ mi OJ6 fOn OfVYOh• ftOWf >a iFWpVJh pFfOh Jmljfl iY;Y iWV=f W1\WOWOIL MJWN !• WS •i WfY2f NeVWVJYf 6P0>O Nhn i \ Wp0 ilMNWiYN a2 WlFUVp6hhNYOMJNhOfh JVh V 1~jh oJNJfIPW JLLNff\~ ~'~O irrJ00>~ OUINi YV9tNaYhwOh s ~ V O O OF NVf iW Vrln6UM0 Y i r ri rOiO J 02iV iiiWVJM 1+V2 i riYZWY~>SONWWY Nh huosWfN zW YYe ~.Ni Y YW~NYOh Y fJJWiV• ON •i• M9YJYYW •VYOpW i YOf NWOJ• N i7iiWf>i• •OOVWZ Yi~WYYYJiWfhpO ~i ~=aMhhf~MffJi WIWLa:s `eYo JYYNNNNnNNJJYJJWiY~Y iiii if ililifliiiffhN hVhamN<N M1_w100Pm0 wa lmNla~ N OPOIOPP O N ry1Pr1 ~N~N ~mNeN 5 V V O T INP U21 y.N 6ry Ofo Zu0 f0~ R Oj> V LL 9 E=6 \• •2 •O •N ~i •_ •W •O • Z •W •> °nn~l w.N+io~.r•~~ ~+e~ieipO °o o•p~.m aw en ee ~oa~pcrmM ee pee N PON NryNaNONO OaOaOP rNmp N aN0 apm NIP rmwm~rmiNahaNmrN maNh •YN O naah0 NTaNahPPONNTaNaM1OPONNTaNaM1/PNNTaNaM1OPO TT ./NNNNNNa ao a$naoomavan~<aa<a<:aaaaaaaaaaa aaaaapaa as ao aiiiaia+a.aa+aaaaaaaaar aaaaaaaa. aaai+.aaaaaaaaaaaa OM1•~hh•~TMNM1hhMh1~•~hhhNhM1hM1M1M1hMrM1hI~r M1NhrPhh Ne~hhhl'~h M1h h1. •~ 1 f f f/ f 11 a Z N O T e p PT r~NA 06TON ~ii• OP NOaT i NT O N P~ a ~~ Iw hia000r TPV TZO f NNP\ hm ae h0 Nu o_oo Ph eNaN pN ianrle ~ Nan io •V fV\f f• fYf OOf/NOON J fffV >LLV as M> >Z> i Y W ;O iOaZ 2 •VJPVV r J•UJ• •J( fr •N OI Z JN• •• J N JVJiU~ MVN :~rJPOJ VNYO ^MV 20V r: • SJ i \ iJf OOJ • SNS wViN rVi N yf JOJJJ Jf h JOt • O J'r'JW JJ Jj NJ 1 OJ6JJ O JJO NJ •Jfp J WrJ<fy•ZW •yh OV •WrV/Yw; JW• •V N_i>_ U_WWSiLLNtUNW YW VO 1\VNO NN Jll > •[ VY JiJ Y ¢Nyi1RN V•[ZW SON » yN yw0 Za¢ fNZNW;O2fei¢ V\OfN\ f2NJZf06 00 O\ ¢2 O ¢ON O; N WfrNaiUWfNW O OLL WON N YWWNrWWNLL O \OWiNh LL 1\N Nw0¢LLN M1_ F_Y r_OL _N ON_NNr h_OF_ _ _r_yOjF__FOLL 00 OF 6_hN0_O• 2 Or NJf L N JfW 2J WIL JWFJMNWOpVWNNNWF>•~ SCWNM1> F_ _ WW6•'OM1_OT NJt yi2 iiWLLwiSf yiiyf 6V i<iN Y ` ys W PJU ZO>NOFW6iW>syJ>WIFFM1O;N hM1iW WW W • yWFW O 1 s?ffiF if NG/:w sf> L=;f iV jL •.Zf >f NZ4`_ G a JO OOLLtNJfLLfWO •JO LLOJ/NILLJf< •f fZWaO SiW ViZ ZRLLwVL¢ V O'\VZOZSVWJ WV6¢w `JL6W OV>VYI NyFTyN/SNYFNMir6MyM1M1yNOOMrNfFJ VfYVLFwRN¢N w 00 NZW=pL NZ;VLW=yY.JNWLWNNWSiN~NLII>li Ww OtNWWOWf W C >W N'j>WW;;WWWf iiw Ora> Wif ;LL>y 6 N IOV •t>ZNNYNOY>ONNOILNO>Y•nri>CVW••>OVVOO wOYOVNOONON V i N O i 2 O O N2 Y J W 3 y y h WN (fNNN iW V•f rW h¢ US O i 6 2 OJO>b NF NV O O • O < W<_ VLL Np O Y~[ • { yi ~~•iiY YOW •O i e: WO OW> ON WO YVV JO• YN ( OV > VWZ Vt JV OYWOY6; •V¢ Z• WC( i 1 rY z< <IW N uuoaWr e Wf fOWY NY (fi VVFY U( 7pV JZ ~N ~( yU¢ NV; WViViVO iiNOYJ> (• NOi fN iJ O( ~ V VNw aYOi>hiOwfN WLOVOf OMI Op ( NUJ<WV/N6hJVll/<WVONV NiZO VYV OZi O¢V JN 1Jj NJW<W ONJLL NJWY •iNN VNi f;/ J(• /JWf f OMVy(rZ >OOV VWNW OyJWfNY f fY <( r NpWrW 1f N00/M1tiViUO~r</a>JJM <f NY /W J 2 Z2Y WFRJ (J if«j iZNNY/OV UV• yIN.V fLLW VWO •fN• •tW 1~N W>• •>YiW UWWiW i2M y.2p FM 20~ OirrVJpi (NO Syy ONVNW •ZOi Oi .iWNNwW OOM Uffi W N/> J~WWYWSOOOOOJJJWr<ViH~Oi>>Yhiy(( ffWU/VMJ fY N2Y V JYWOfYNrJJ(>Ji2VOJYi6/Wrf Ji~iYN VV2y(<NWiVW afw :`:Jl:YYN9fifIWWWNYYJffiiMJ000000 y'JyWOY<OiN•• Z/N f1 <af<OOi//OOOOOOVUUVVVVVVVVV VVVOPOWWWWW /NN al'~NNNNNMNaININNTOONaONOPaNNPaNT NPrOOPN~O ~paN N afN NTTO• P<TOaTO aNTTTM1 TpN N.4hThMNh NhT T hMNw hTT NhN NT OhNNTT hNhN ~, 6,~ ytl V6N =;0 V f O O Oj4 u I` E P• O• O• S• 'J• p~0• •}• • ~ •2• ~V •F ¢~ ~V\ •N •O• '..a.nDni'ooDDOeamiMDOwmeeonaoomninooon•D+~eoMeaeeoD poo+De m De DO ±e pp J NJOOPP••NNNONOOaNnOOaNNNaTaNOdaON000000PP mN • Na~NONN ••••N ••nawN wP V T wa tia••o Nyah NN o N m ~• d •• N n TINanOPO.•NI.IJNahOPO• TaNaPOPO••N PIN a~daaOM1hhFhhh PPPP PPOOYnrwtiwFA~hn~ aaaaaaaa aoa°as aao °aaa<aaao alai aa1 iial •aia111a11a Ilaaaaa a1a •aii~. OnnnnnhnhhhNhnhnNMhPnNhhhhhn n••MnnMM1PhwnFM1hPNNM1FFPnFn ! ii Y ii! i ! •• ~ !Tn N PN P OT OT6 NN IN d PO NV OOWO Oi OOd hl•PN O/i N i JaNOyP P OV 3If p\i NON JIN I! h llliil \ NOp iMl ioi N WNmI .. ! W l~JN •O FNO Plii\N LT_ OS\ ! LL\O f00 N iNfNlry iP \ J!p 20N •MLI PJ ONd illl< V»ry1V > UP1U Who U U V uUCIOi N V iw ~!O w n F:w ?Nf J lJJi2 ITii i_ V 6JJJP6 W JiY Z !Y JJ J W7N NNh JN f \W WJ Nw •111N NNh 4~ NNJ O • lV •N W.hiWN 7i VJ'NJ CNJ i'MJJM iNfNiJV i~JO\.Z. 60~VN{JFJyn » ZLL i0u•J ffJJ •VS '1000NZ IFOJ 21 NVS\Op_ OWf WOLLLL fF 2N~.f HU WV~I{IHOf[ LLIL NII- SZLL~fryhfhFF\LL U. IN hi.•t 006Vi NOiii •IhONi IOOOLS f10hON.•Z ZiNOpY• OZGJL WY{{6 N1•IZMZNwG 1.nV OLL ih i SN6166 SUr. V6N iVi LLOOONP•CISOp •{w LLOJWCSLLf wY .• Z ~ LOOJWwWOO f MI `O Oh6 WW h wR hWOJOOhWWZO 6Z N i'Z hn0[•FFhO i ••pMN» iiiNyh ~`KFhwfOhtYFO`j J~WOf<JWJO•Y~jVJLL6JYJfN~LNi•ff yJ UfJMWO~00~Wff OhStOi<U96VppUi L\C iYpiiRJi20 .ViZ iiJUhli. hhhJ~Nh Y.wOhYwiiYi)hfnhiVW OhJhh<60 SNLL<WW=WN P_.• ___OiLNNiLNJ{.•W WN OO)NWNNLWNWNN'JWWLSZ W2{O WF WO fWSSpWS2•<>}jWS •SaMfiw202~ WCO NO>NOFOO< PiVNwn•f 9)M M.+iYVLV000NM.tOwp OWO.•V Ni00>1h O i i • ~ i ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~[• ~f~ •2• s c ~tl• •O~ •Z •W• •)• u• V YV tf 2 J V ~ W { • V¢ O. uV YV Z UC V~ h= VU H N w MO DZ iM LLW { OWU NO ie YZ WLL o u a: sh »i ..+W DD iWi { u iuo ~ i .. .i ~tli vv aNa •z o ~ <z iw H • i ..u `~~N ~.• i~ -..e uy D • siW .ze u •rW OWJ~f O L O f pe h M» YUNZ htlLL ZZJ< WO : { Wi j00> V Nf • VSi.[ •7• ii Wi ~ JNJV o >V YOfaWY_W LLW=i f JOM YW{ •6•W< .•O NUO•Zi O M Ni S N Oip •O i_V7 Oiw w ii{FeW {Oh NNF• V•V LL{•OUV MhV O~ O Y~f Vf•WN10.1L OW •iVN WW ON { Nsu <Di < iiNWO zoz W ON •eosef ziiizJW ae..f ~YW {NWhh.e~N •OV OWpi9h{ fhiUYYOVOtY<ihh~6 J O{ ij JOVV{ Ni6JNVJi O• •jNNy NV<L 1wj•f LZJ NVOWJN ji < J! iW• I •hi0 S• W >u `f JOJOWVU•< •YLOVYiV O••O y1 JZ •ON NfiJiY„Vh{O •O N• OJNOV jL OVpJ{SNVWWW jViiOZWWhh6 •~i •• pifNNVW I•WN •J0j1[YN pLLLL6LLLLf0006b••fWWInO0O7>\ID ~ZWii00•ftWOOf•fff «• LL LLIIVYVDLLLLLLZLLjL.•uwwMYw•[ K•[•fYYJJJJJJiLiiijjj f<OiNNO~NNInN••N OP OI•I .INdNNNaNM1NNNPPN OOTPPiaNNNPPNdO anphPIPPNNPiNNdNwIN i.IP •OI~ONNIOP IPnIh aNNNNNI•I I`1"'+ T OdOa ^•• nAiOam^III~P PadaO.••• PO wI•IP a••PPPOa NPNN•. nIPP N N NP PPP 1.1 NTPN •1 ..1 NPP 7 epeoewNNOPOM1NavNpNaeewoFOaNOmNNOaa pe 'o lm-epoPOaaNOavPwnvFN ehoaeeNeplovNwoo w•a wOaNaaOw OaN1ePN000P0 mwFnnaaPplPaONONOarOwmNV a papNNNN pNNNNaNNnN aaaoP OaFn c'n Na y NaN • na a N ., • wN nn \ • N w r .~ < .. {NP V2~ yfN =~0 SLLO f00 V L NaM1mPpNNpaNaFpPONNnanVFpPONNnaNNnpPONNnaNaFp "I~wnnrr "~"rp-n~nn~~Y~Fwn rrl.•aaaa NN~rF«nrN. .N-~wnhn ah FFFFM1M1FM1 aaaaaaallaaaaa aaaaaalaaalaaaa•aalVllaa aaaa •a OnnFhhFFFhM1M1hFFFFFhNFFFFFFFFhFFPM1M1FM1FFFM1FFFMFFhhFhhF it • < LL < Lw L i if m • U n<a0 O P aVNLNN N e N PY N NMN T P f0 • ~ h i o I F "wa N o{ e f ~Nh Na n.h N i i 1 Npl I m pt M1 e DoN nnvr Ne mom • aNP w 19 P O PN• ih OTON _ eL _ n L y~ _ i i :n<N L op < re< ii PJNV rOW Y J ~hN<fM1 4J FN NS J ~LJF6 V WONF• VV V J\ LSLYU VUr VJ \FV<n V {htpVViU r 2 uVVON pD LNiiLO /L6VNMVVOSNF • N1-IL 6J2 1• J O{2 J \ O FJJWJNW\J JJN f2LNNW P W<ONfNIJ /J aiNJtiJ J10 Nf •WN •VL i2 ~+If •D • fVYUSYUWiN6<NVT • iWFfynNpf JF i {YNNSN OpNLLNp O FJJN'J Jh2 9 N <J ~OOW JSS WNO ~DOOYfimnrJ V •S• V10 1 VLSpILF< SNOUOhNLN pf h\LLVppLLONhW> O2>R Ylh NFOHLLFriNWWULWf OOfMVLIL LWYNON LLLFLLOW~LIN NY IZiFi{NiN{ONI[VFJMOViJOi VJOFfO hYJODMO ftrN JLL266 fS0> {LV{LVNNJ SLiNiNL N JSLSOFOY67 SL {F_f I NJlpr~+ <FWOi F_V_OY_JW O_IJ_F _WYV •L: 6W{ U{2LILLN LOiNGW6f 10 Sf{V y~YLW L NJ {WOSOWW >ir W JyLLUWiF i WM1WWW LLY h:WrOo •N YhNrFhFfFiOJY LNZV yyrNWV NI L\O iiDiy y i/ O» » JO~WJ<ONSJ<YfIOnN'Jf10U1a0<J~WNL 6<t0 <V09fFOfWJM1 i{2{rY0220UWOLbp< LpSMO<LVL2FeSpL6i Lry2{OpiL{YJ FSFFJYSFL7riiMpLZFIF Wr 7>rIY NFFYFOLY YI]Y>JFp J6FLW ~ • rNVMNLNNNWLLB SSYWWZtONN WY ~WSNNNNL WLWYLLNp LL~NNO •r~ mMwatiwvNiMO UI•yfi~O1~NJ0»'1eOVN~2oiMpNMii00ZONaIw i~60~~Z • • i a 7 O FV N O LS ' { ON ~ f S f O O M F LO SWN J 1 J Vi S 1 O f • p V i i • r>r J Y r _ • Z wL WWY{ OOi a LO{N N~ w S O R • F NNO VNF N JVff V V O Vp • • <_ W_ iN O <VLS WJ JYN pp YIYFiFf• W VYi<Wif W WhFOW p yJl lJr • • N 2S N V{ NLLWtW2ON 0<~MY M1MVSSLR >O p • • i:a = J< F OrY~NiO M FV W W MMWN' SV 6IQf Wl IJN ~ VOO Yh>Y> • wJW{NOa •tFL LWp yWWf~ VGWL a naW N10. O{ ~{<r >LFS{Y<LLO { VJIYOWii ~i • 'J WS •n<ie<iZ{{Y L700<Y > OJFNiiJ 6JJDONO{ny2W2WLp aV IrtUi U <pJ {il0 UU NViViFW<~O<rVr J<Y9t><J~ p II • •Z NJ •~i UNN OOrJJ {YNI WONL>OONf OVpLN{V i/lV{SV JJOf</bNfWVf J2J2N 7NFb><Il •N OOYW • • ZJ MJf<~[ >\\f lipNW9[FYJNW 01<f 2 F ODOOh •S rr •OpWM • NWT ONNO •f<NN OODLJOMLFf O i LFW LNSSLNf<YFN<NOD • 1 ">ZSVO~JhrYl <MMS V F[NV •IFf yIDOJ 2VVYJNVWWWVY •i• L{{F JitYLOOLFrFIyOO>2 NWOI` lFDL<Jni S00<OLLJJJll •i• i{iiitiiii[iiiiSliS20000000LLLLLLLLOY{{YYYptsuufj ulNNN MAnNnN~NppnwFl lN. I~a~paOpapNnNnphNNlfPOaPNP{PpNPNOLeawiOiln N n^NhOaOOlnaOmpN Na aNnllanNl N~NYOM1N N=N=pppaeFnP FIrIn NN ATPT nPP NnPI1A p Pp NHNN Opp N pFw J 1~ 2 v LNP <rM1 ymN Of0 Sa YLLO mK0 Or LL V f c p• f i• •p• •Z• ~tl• •m• •< ia• O O ii 1 I W •i 1 < 9ii .! ~O O ~Y •W m m~NN p wdm NPmnNVr000m w NNnw• wN OvNN d m .~ ~ udim mNwmNNNrdN n n NdwmPOJryNdwOrNn•NmrmPprNmV OdOdOhwwrrrmmmmmmmmmmNPPPP WwrwwwwFrwwFn.rrrw rnnn nrhF Fr Nan••rn+ +rrf<VI••<•1•<VJ a w.. hw r~.h rwrrrrr.hrrr K V 1• Im mmmmm m O ~+ i P N 7 Ph •NN r nr SOP V u \ \nm n m~ n ^INYm J OR V PIN•Oh f V \v\NO Jr op V NVhmn •JS O Nhl \\ V<~ •O r0 Jm Z Oa VI J J<J aONJ mm ewo o°a rW.p» ra yl Y~JOWZ •JW~J LLa\V n0 Nu<K< •pn0 O OOrI 20 Lil i2 • WP P N pI rLLfW 'J 1L 6 aON Oh r20Zr NJOJJ JSwO ~ •i Natl OM NWVrrWN Oh>ZOLLOP mY lSOWWa OYOWwZJ <Zf nl r0 ~OV~WW O=i=Rf< Oo6pfW V JOf J OW 1iWi SF6026pN lprUNmMOW~Jr OZ ryma y JirlWrrrYVlriK Wti2>fYn• •y WSSmFW~V<\>W~1 62MNJ6J0 NN 2'JM0196miUOZ2! O V 00 r rV ~wOOV OSs 6J~LpSWV wr •O iVww SrWNNtJJ WJ~wif VU Nii>NJ NNNNNNNN .pN PyN nWnm en w n N° a WN <W r !r ON n ~~ VG TQ Hi Oo NN •n V H • M as WN i V W t N ri FN V O ~Mr O atl NiON 2VV O •O _h FI V_< Y1L N • J tlJ fJ<RFaV iiW Rtl NVZrOWriW14M tlN OWNMYNJJLL fJ !C LN~K 72 UM s:yO~i>rrrFNOK YOiNrNKNNrKY NNrf r90YaaaaK~ NwNi'IPrOrrONOv ~mm^NaM1FNry nnNr 9, uia x ur nvivx;nv uuunin~xv un ~, ~;~;=. STAFF REPORT `{~ h_. DATE: March 3, 1993 G T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Will tam J. 0'Ne il, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ADOPTINr, A LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS PROGRAM APDLYiMG TO PRDPOSED DEVELOPMENT RECOMIENDATION It is recommended the attached resolution be adopted to insure the City's compliance with the newly adopted Congestion management Program (CMP). DACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The CMP is a statewide program to moot for and reduce traffic congestion. It was established by Proposition 111, passed in 1990, and must be implemented by Cities in order to receive the adds tional gas tax money provided by proposition 111. The CMP was adopted by SANBAG for San Bernardino County and its cities. The program is administered largely by Sa nbag, but each City must monitor certain traffic volumes, require Trafftc Impact Analysis Reports of proposed development of appropriate size, require necessary traffic mitigation measures by such development, especially if a neighboring city is impacted, and prepare reports on street segments which deteriorate excessively in traffic service level. The resolution attached to this report adopts the traffic analysis procedure to produce the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) reports mentioned above. The criteria for requiring a TiA report in Rancho Cucamonga are proposed in Sectton 3 of the resolution. It is also Dossible a small development may require a traffic impact analysis of a simpler nature as part of it's review prrcass. CONCLUSION Adoption of the Land Use/Transportation Analysis Program by resolution is required but is largely ministerial because TIA reports have been required since adoption of the CMP in December, The resolution will, however, 10 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPDRT MARCH 3, 1993 APPROVAL DF RESOLUTION ADOPTING A LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS PROGRAM PAGE 2 officia~ly establish the criteria for Rancho Cucamonga for which a TIA will be submitted to Sanbag. Sanbag will review such reports for format and transmittal of copies to other agencies if necessary. A further action by the City Council will be required in the near future. The CMP calls for adoption o` a "Trip Reduction" or "Transportation Demand Management" ordinance by the end of June, 1993. This ordinance is being drafted by the Engineering and Planning Oivtsions using guidelines set forth by Sanbag and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Respectfully submi-tted, G~ lNv WiiLiam J. O'Neil~~ City Engineer WJO:PAR:Iy Attachment 11 RESOLUTION N0. 93- ~3 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A LANG USE/TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS, Section 55089.3 (a) of the CalTfornla Government Code requires development and implementation of a Congestion Management Program in each of California's urbanized counties; and NHEREAS, the San Bernardino Associated Governments has been designated the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) for San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS, the CMP provides a method of relating community regional goals regarding land use, traffic congestion, and air quality, while retaining local authority to approve land use decisions; and WHEREAS, the CMP has designated a system of roadways on which traffic congestion is to be monitored; and WHEREAS, Section 65089.3(a) of the California Government Code requires the county and each city to adopt and Implement "a program to analyze the Impacts of land use decisions, Including an estimate of the costs associated with mitigating these impacts" on the CMP network of roadways. NON THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA hereby adopts the Land Use/Transportation Analysis Program as specified herein. 1. PURPOSE The purpose of Lhe land Use/Transportation Analysts Program of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is to evacuate the potential impact of land use decisions within the City an the transportation system both within and outside the City. The evaluation of potential impacts shall be conducted in a Traffic Impact Analysts Report (TIA Report), prepared by the development pro,)ect applicant. 2. DEFINITIONS Congestion Management Agency - (CMA) - The agency responsible for developing the -Congas on nagemen rogram and coordinating and monitoring its implementation. Congestion Management Program (CMP) - A program required for each urbanized county in Ca7iforn-tea, pursuani- o1-California Government Code Section 65059. CMP Intersections - Intersections of two CMP roadways. C~MP_Segment - A section of CMP roadway between two CMP intersections, or, for 11m~ access highways, a section between two interchanges. RESOLUTION N0. MARCH 3, 1993 LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS PROGRAM PAGE 2 KeY_Intersectlons - CMP Intersections plus other intersections on the CMP roa ay ne worker-eemed to be critical to traffic operations on that roadway. Level of Service - (LOS) - A qualitative measure describing operational con ons w t n a ra c stream; generally described in tuns of such factors as delay, speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Link - A length of roadway between bvo Intersections. A CMP segment would y~pfcally consist of several roadway links. Ram -Connecting roadway between a freeway and a surface street or between freeways. Travel Demand Mana ement - (TDM) - pemand based techniques for reducing ra c conges on, suc as r es aring programs and flexible work schedules enabling employees to commute to and from work outside of peak hours. CMP Model - The transportation planning model or models, consistent with the eg ono del, which is used for preparing CMP forecasts for San Bernardino County. Traffic ! act Anal sis (TIA) Re rt - A report prepared by a local ur s c on or eve oilmen pro ec app lcant identifying the potential impact of the proposed protect and mitigations needed to maintain the traffic level of service on the CM network. VeMcle Trip - A one-way movement of a vehicle between two points. 3. REQUIREMENTS TIA Reports shall be prepared by local ,iur15d1ctions when focal criteria and thresholds Indicate they are necessary, or when the proposed development exceeds haif the size of the CEQA thresholds for regional review. The thresholds for required TIA Report preparation are: 250 Dwelling units 250,000 GSF retail space 325,000 GSF industrial space 125,000 GSF office space 250 hotel/motel rooms For mixed use developments, o~ staged developments, the siza of each proposed use shall be divided by the appropriate land use Lype threshold shown above to determine a land use size ratio. A TIA report wail re required 1f Lhe sun of the land use size ratios equals or exceeds I.O. A procedure far making this detennlnation 1s provided 1n Appendix C of the 1992 CMP. 13 RESOLUTION N0. MARCH 3, 1993 LANG USE/TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS PROGRAM PAGE 3 Local criteria to be used for the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be the size, type and location of a protect as they relate to the probability of a significant traffic impact. The TiA Reports shall be copied to the CMA upon the receipt of the report by the City from the preparer. If the TIA Report determines that the protect would add 50 or more 2-way peak hour trips to a CMP arterial within another Jurisdiction or 100 2-way peak hour trips on a freeway, that turisdlction (and Cal trans, if a state highway) shall be provided a copy of the TIA Report. TIA Reports shall be provided to the CM0. and adtacent Jurisdictions so that information exchange and commmlcatlon can occur in concert with the permitting Jurisdiction's protect review schedule and prior t0 any approval or permit activity. Agencies which receive TIA Reports shall provide any comaents within 3 weeks of the date the TIA Report was mailed by the permitting Jurisdiction. Should the comments received from adtacent turisdTctlons, the CIM, Cattrans, or transit agencies recommend changes to the TIA Report, the peneltting turisdictlon shall consider coewents received and make changes deemed necessary 6y the permitting JurlSdictton. Should the changes De such that the permitting tur/sdlctTon chooses to recirculate the document, the commenting agencies will complete Lhe review of the revised document within two weeks of receipt. This process is Intended to be consistent with any actions required under the local Land Use/Transportation Analysts Program. If the City wishes communications to be on record with the CMA, the City should forward copies to the CM11 to be logged and filed. The CM1 is available to serve as a clearinghouse for such communications regardless of the size of the subtect protect. These coewunlcations will document forecast implications of land use decisions and, if deficiencies arise which are attributable to another turisdlctlon's land use decisions, can De a bests for lnterturisdlctlonal sharing of the responsibility to ml ti gate transportation impacts. If the City believes that portions of the CMP network within their boundaries are likely to 6e impacted by a land use decision within an adtacent turlsdictlon, they may request, but cannot require, Lhat the adtacent Jurisdiction prepare a TIA report on the subtect protect. Such a request is necessary 1f the size of the protect exceeds the adtacent turisdiction's review threshold, but special circumstances may suggest a need for additional analysis. Attachment 1 of this resolution provides the detailed guidelines for preparing TYA Reports. Mhile the guidelines provide same degree of flexibility in the preparation of TIA reports, significant variations from these guidelines by the preparer of the TIA report may 6e permitted subtect to lead agency approval and with notice provided to the CIM. 14 RESOLUTION N0. MARCH 3, 1993 LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS PROGRAM PAGE 4 4. THE LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS PROCESS The steps Involved in the process are listed below: - A development application is submitted to the city. - If the City determines that protect review is required, based on the estab115hed size criteria, the City shall provide the applicant with the standardized TIA procedures and report format. - If neither the City's size criteria nor the CMP thresholds are met, no TIA Report 1s required. However, Cal trans and the CM11 shall be notified by the City for proposed traffic-generating protects (other than a single family residence) 1n Federally designated urbanized areas where any portion of the protect abuts a State highway or abuts a roadway which Intersects a State highway, and is w1tM n 500 feet of that intersection, including Interchange ramps. The purpose of th15 requirements 1s to provide Cal trans with advance warning of an opportunity to acquire right- of-way for additional turning lanes at intersections on the CMP network. - The City shall submit a copy of the caapleted TIA Report to the CMA. For protects adding 50 or more 2-way peak hour trips to a CMP arterial within another turlsdlction or 100 2-way peak hour trips on a freeway, the City shall provide that Jurisdiction (and Cal trans, 1f a state highway) with e copy of the TIA Report. - Potentially impacted turisdictlons may review the TIA Report and provide technical comments to the City and the CM11. The CMA may also comment to the lead agency, and may attach the comments of other turisdictlons. - The Cfty shall consider the responses of potentially impacted turisdictlons, Caltrons, and the CMA during deliberations on the protect or pion approval. An impacted turlsdlction may request to meet with the City to resolve technical issues associated with the TIA, which may Include the magnitude of an impact, location of an Impact, timing of an Impact, nature of the proposed mitigation, estimated cost of mitigation, and apportionment of responsibility to m111gate the Impact. - Forecast interturlsdlctional impacts of a protect are to be ml ti gated through a facility Improvement or strategy developed tolntly by the City, the protect applicant, and the impacted turisdlction(s). - A turlsdlction 1n which the CMP system 1s impacted by a land use decision of the City should be compensated by the City or the protect applicant for any mitigations required within the impacted Jurlsdtctton. If this compensation does not occur, and a deficiency plan is required according to CMP guidelines to address the impacted portion of the CMP system, the TIA Report may be used to assist 1n to apportioning the responsibility to mitigate the deficiency within the impacted turlsdlction. 15 RESOLUTION N0. MARCH 3, 1993 LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS PROGRAM PAGE 5 - If resolution between the City and a potentially impacted ,jurisdiction cannot be achieved, the impacted ,iurisdlction may request (but cannot require) the City to condition approval of a project on monitoring of traffic and/or travel characteristics to and from the project site, and provision of mitlgatlon as warranted based on the results of monitoring. At the lead agency's discretion, this may be required of a project as a mechanism to verify the magnitude of the impacts of a specific project on CMP roadways, and provide for mitigations as needed following project approval. 5. SUMMARY OF AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES CM4 Responsibilities - Deternine conformmnce of locally adopted Land Use/Transportation Analysis programs pursuant to Government Code Section 65089.3. - Review TIA Reports for technical consistency as a basis fx the deterwination of CMP conforsiance. - Participate as needed in discussions on the potential interjurisdlctlonal Impacts of land use decisions, mitlgatlon of potential deficiencies, and fair apportionment of responsibility for mitigation, et the request of the City or a potentially impacted ,jurisdiction. - Maintain the CMP TIA Report guidelines and coordlnete modlflcatlon of the guidelines as needed. If modification is needed, the modified versions of the guidelines are to be distributed to all local ,jurisdictions, transit agencies, and Cal trans. Any modifications to the guidelines are to 6e developed and recomaended by a technical committee which consists of staff representatives of the CIM and local ,jurisdictions, and must ultimately be approved 6y the CMA Board. - As needed, assist the air districts in developing a menu of transportation controi measures or trip reduction and travel demand management strategies will receive credit as traffic mitlgatlon measures. - Assist 1n making traffic, transit and TDM data available to local agencies for purposes or preparing CMP TIA reports. - In cooperation with SCAG and the local Jurisdictions, plan for and implement a regional database of existing land use, approved changes to land use, and proposed changes 1n land use. - In cooperation with SCAG, make data available tram the CMP model for use in local models. - Maintain a log and file of TIA Reports received, responses to TTA Reports is RESOLUTION N0. MARCH 3, 1993 LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION AIULYSIS PROGRAM PAGE 6 received, and dates of submission of responses to the lead agency as part of the required database on traffic Impacts. - Develop guidelines, 1n cooperation with local ,jurisdictions and Cal trans, for traffic monitoring programs potentially needed to eronitor traffic generated by certain development projects. City Responsibilities - Adopt and implement the Land Use/Transportation Analysis Program. - Act as lead agency for preparation of TIA Reports on projects within the City. - Implement a transportation model and/or analytical procedures capable of analyzing the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system, both within the ,turlsdictton and 1n adjacent ~urisdlctlons. - Provide copies of TIA Reports to all Jurisdictions 1n which pro~ect- imposed traffic impacts are Identified. - Provide a copy of all TIA Reports to the CMA and list ,jurisdictions to which the TIA Reports are being sent. - Incorporate consideration of TIA Report results and responses of other ,jurisdictions on TIA Reports into the land use decision and traffic Impact mitigation process and certify that the analysis 15 consistent with the CMP guidelines. - Participate as needed in discussions on potential lnterjurlsdictlonal Impacts of land use decisions, mitigation of potential deficiencies, and fair apportionment of responsibility for mitigation. - Respond to TIA reports prepared by other ,jurisdictions and bring traffic impact issues to their attention. - Notify Cal trans and the CMA of traffic-generating projects (other than single family residences) within Federally designated urbanized areas with a property line 1n common with a State highway or within 500 feet of a state highway along an intersecting street. - Consider requir/ng traffic monitoring programs for certain development protects to confine follow-through of comaitments made to the agencies impacted by that development. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Resoonstb111t1es - Make models and model data available to local agencies for purposes of preparing TIA Reports. 17 RESDLUTIDN ND. MARCH 3, 1993 LAND USE/TRANSPDRTATIDN ANALYSIS PRDCRAM PARE 7 - Maintain soctaeconamtc data sets for models. - In cooperation with the appropriate air district, deteniine which trip reduction/travel demand management strategies will race/ve credo as traffic mitigation measures. Cal trans Responsibilities - Make traffic count and level of service lnforwation available to local Jurisdictions preparing TIA Reports. - Review CMP TIA Reports, provide a response to the impacting Jurisdiction, and enter into discussions on the resolution of impacts on State roadways as appropriate to each situation. Transit Agency Responsib111ties - Make transit information available to local agencies preparing TIA Reports. - Review CMP TIA Reports as submitted by local Jurisdictions, provide comments to the requesting Jurisdiction, adJacent impacted Jurisdictions, and the CIM, and participate in Lhe process to resolve ldentffied impacts. Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCIIUlD) and San ernar no oun y r o u on on ro s r e eSpo s es - Maintain a list of transportation improvements that are acceptable air quality mitigations for Inclusion 1n the action Dlans of TIA Reports. I8 Sat Bernardino County CMP APPENDIX C GIIIDF1.BdFS FOR CMP TRAFFIC UIPACI' ANALYSIS REPORTS W SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY These guidelines describe the key elements requved for preparing Twffic Impact Andysis Reports fITA Reports) for ~e Congestion Mmagement Program (CMP) in Satz Bernatdwo County. The Phu of Woe guiddioes h m achieve s cotomon approach of preparing a TIA by dl jurisdictions, thereby, reducing inconsistencies and disagreements on how such studies should be performed. TIA Reports shill be preparod by local jurisdictions when local criteria sod thresholds indicate thry arc necessary. However. TU reports must ~ Prepared m satisfy CMP requtremeats wben the proposed devdopmeot equals or exceed[ the fouowing size thresholds. Theo thresholds represem hdf of Me thresholds for regiond review requred by the Giifornla Eovironmennl Qudiry AU (CEQA): • 250 Dwelling Units 250,[100 GSF Retail • 325,000 GSF Lxlustrid • 125,000 GSF Office • 250 Units Horcl/MoW For mind ux or staged deveAOptttentt, the siu of each proposed use shill be divided by the appropriue land use type threshold shown above m establish size ratio for each Isnd use. A T1A report will be required if the sum of the land use size ratios equals or exceeds 1.0. Projects shill roc be split m avoid the CMP requircmeetr. If ao addition) plisse of a project, when added m the preceding phases, rat[ses the sum of the plisses m exceed the threshold, We entire projett must be aadyzed ss a unit. The analysis must be wodutud when the phases are aoticipamd and ahould not wait for later phaza, even if culler phases done woWd not exceed the threshold. Lulividud development projeaa, parcels, or proposals in We same geognpbic vicinity (within t2 mile of each older) Wu un ressonably be enmbieed imo a single project for aodysis purposes which meets the threshold requirements for a TIA Repoli shall be aodymd ss a single project. All TIA Repom shill be copied m the CMA. If a TIA Report is prepared by the locd jurisditxion u sound above, sod if tltc T[A Report determines that the projeR woWd dd SO or more 2-wry peak hour hips m ^ CIvIP utaid wlthln anodtes je[tadtGlOD Or 100 2-wry peak hour trips m a fivewry, thu jurudiaioo (avd Cdtram, if a srua highwry) shill be providrd ^ copy of the TtA Report by ~ P~~B juriaditzioo. However„ those criteria are not intended m determios when a lacd jurisdiaion prepares a TIA Report. It u the respotuibiliryof the Idol jurisditgion m provide mica oopia of the TIA Report m the CMA and m porrntldly impaebed jurisdiction w thu mica will omrr io wnbett aim the permitting jurisdiction's projatteview achedWe, and prior to any append or ptxmitrleg activity. The period dlatrad for review chill be uipWated by the PCB ltuisdiaioo but shall not fie Iess than three web from the due of mailing of We report. Should serious fachnical flaws be Cd APPmd~ C Sat Betnardirro CanrUV CMP identified in the 'I7A Report such that the permining jurisdiction chooses m rxitculam the 77A Report, the rxirculated document shall be reviewed within two woks of rxeipt. so it is essential Nat local jurisdictiom wmider the necessary actiom and cost required m mitigate impacts thaz result from local Imd trse decisions. 'ILe reports focus on the pountiil impaar of Imd use dxisiom oa roe CMP actwork, iLese reports are mad in conjunction with amuil modeling for the CMP network m forecast tramportatioa defieiexies in Sm 13ermtdiao County. While Here arc unique aspect m tnavy projear, the approach outlined here wo be applied m the vast majority of project. 7Le preparer of the report is respomible for presenting all the rclevmt iaformuioo thaz would be hdpfW w making transportation- related dxisiom. TLe guiddiaea preurtred here should be rcguded as typical minimum requirement. They are not a substinrte for exercising good planning and eogioxring judgment. Local agexies may wish to include edditiooil requitemmtr for traffic analysis beyond thou for the CMP. Only the CMP requirement ue addrased here; any requitement added by a jurisdiction apply ody io that jurisdiction, udeu otherwise egrerd. Other information relating m the prepuatioa of a 71A repot[ my be found in CLapter t of the Congestion Managemm[ Program for Sm Bttnudino County. Prepartxs of TIA report thould comult the CMP for addidoail detail. 'ILe mthority m approve or dewy devdopmeat rest with local jurisdiaiom. However, the Land Use/fnaspmtatan Aailysis Program hss the poteotiil m influence local land rye dxitiom by providing full eviluetioa and diulmure of impaar m the regionil vaasportation system, regardless of jmisdictioml bottadaria. Local jurisdiuiom are w'Wuired m maintain the dopted laud of service standuds on the CMP system, 7Le surxu of the program relies on wmisteary with applicable regional pram, and the caopuative efforts of local jurvdictiom, Caltram, and the CMA. !f m iategntaa of land uu dxisiom and the provitioa of trampoctuioa facilities is nos axomplished u requited by the program, a jurisditctioa which fails m mitigate deficieociea oa the CMP system wtM by it land use dxisiom [nay face withhaldiog of it Prvpmitioo 111 gu tax increment funds. (nmem of the Tr~'c 1®aY Amlvait Retort 1~A1 'ILO 77A Rnpmt may 60 Camal00d~wllhin OthCl similu doatmenb (e.g. >o EIR prepared under CEQA), or it may be m indNendem document. 7Le intent is m addrms all CMP coocernt without duplication of other work. Ice some jurisdistiom, the 77A Report mry lx prepared by the devdoper or developer's wnsultaac In other jurisdictiom, the 1U Report may be proparod by We juridiction or juriWiction's comultam. !o eiWer care, h is in the iote:ve of ill patties that the pardeipants fully undersund and wtna m agreemerd on the asmmptiom and marhodology prim m oondutxiog the ataW analysis. 'Nis is particularly importot when amideriag tying atstrmptiom thatvary from the Dorm. YLe loci jurirdition may troqumt a enacting wh6 the devdopar aod/m prspare of the 77A Report m diuws the methodology prior m the initiation of work on the amlyaia. 7Le fallowing Outline and wmmeotaty repramy the rewmmeoded atntbane for We TU report. C•2 APPe~+' C San Bernardino CoraW CMP L Introduction. Should set the stage for the sadysis, providing background information necessary for the unfamiliar reads ro understand the rtugnimde of the projecr, location of the projerx, and specid characteristics. A. Projat, geaerd plan or specific plan description. If this is already ircluded in ataxhu put of a cram wmprehemive doratmem, that is aoreptrhle. 'Ibe description must ihcludeprojtsx siu by land late type, location of project, approximate locuion of proposed atoms points m the Ioeai anti regional roadway system, and aavemenrs from adjacent screen Wowed irm and out of the project Ibis should be shown in a site diagram. Spxid chuatreristia of the site, such as ueustsol daily or seasoml peaking cbatarxeristim or heavy iovolvemmt of ttuclt traffic, should be meotiorted. B. Analysis rruthodology. Provide a geaerd description (ovtxview) of the process used m amlym the project. Anaysis ytan should be specified and the approach m the modeling/tratfic torocasting pttstzsa should be explained. 7be sources of information should be idtmified. '[be study area attd mtahad fm Invd of serviu atsdysis for the vatiom roWway typm should be idemitied. At a minimum, the study area must include W freewry liob with 1110 or [rare peak hour project trips (two-way) and other t~ roadways with 50 or mom peak hour project trips (nvo-way). 7be study uns does tan cad with a city boundary. '[be study am is defined by the tnagnimde of project trips done. However, the andyais Deed tat extend mom than five mile bryood the project site, even ff there ere more than SO project trips oo ao artarid 100 project trig oa a freeway. Within the defined sady area, all "key intenectiom,' u listed in the most wtreot CMP, must 6e aodyxd. Key inrersxtiom represent intexseGiom of CMP roadways plm those additional iorersecdom recogtdzed by local jurisdigiom m be important m nabUity on CMP roadways may be comideted loy imenaiiom. At ^ mintmnm~ ~r in~iam will itrlude sigmlixed itdaaecdom operating at LOS D or below. 7be distribtstioh ~af traftic trust be shown for all eoadtvays on which projta trips cram (except theta for iaeernal eicwlation), whether oc tax they ate oo the CMP raxwork. 7be astdytis of traffic operatiom and level of service is m be provided for the following tonditiom and is m mduda m assesstneat of traffic mitigation cequiremmts for project opening dry and Nhue ennditiom. Existing eooditiom - rotditiom, at We time of TiA preparation, without the ieclmion of the Project geheratad trips. Existing defieieacim should be identified, but mitigation aodysis is [tot required. 7be existing wnditiom amlysis [trust irclttde the full projecr impact wren at de'ntted above. 2. Project oPmint dry -the cotditiom on the opening day of the project, ftrst excluding WO Project traffic. anti then including ~e projecttraffe assuming the [hll trip generation Impact of the site. 7be Poem of the opening dry amlysis fs on We arms roquircmeats fm the Lire and mry be limited m the immediate area turroaoding the projet. 3. Fume cooditiom -the rohditiom for two 1010 aamaria: 1)"mcdadlog the project trallk, anti 2) ioduding the Project «aflk. Full mitigation arulysis is m De performed for futirrs woditiom. C3 Apparrdta C San Bernardino County CMP m addition, a staging malysis of mitigations may be requved for loge projects comwcted ova a long time pttiod. 7te raced for a staging analysis will be determined by me local jurisdiction. CMA. Also describe me relevmr portion of me metre network ss contained in me generil plan wimin me smdy ua. B. Existing volumes. "ITse milysis of me project opening day and future condition shall be based on, si a minimum, me PM peak hour of me adjaeeat meet traffic. M awlysis of the AM peak hour of me adjacent street traffic is also requred mr developmenrs containing residemiil land uses, and may be roquved for omen types of devdopmen[ u IoW discretion. Anilysis may be required for peak hours omcr mm me AM and PM peak for some land uses. 7tis detertninuion will be made by me IoW jurisdiction. 71se peak traffic generation hour of the devdopmen[ smut dso be idatifwd, and me mtil vebide grips during me pale hou of me geaerstor must be estimated. 7tit will faciliLte a dxision regarding me nod a eviluate time periods omen mm me peak hours of me adjacent streers. U. F.xistiog conditions. A. Existing roadway system. Provide a snap and brief writtw description of me roadway nawork. 'ILe tmmbu of Iaoa oo ttuwaya, principil sneriils, sod omet impasxed roadways should be identified. Signilized intersection sod plow for sigoilizatioo should be identified. The existing Dumber of Iona u key CMP intersections should ba datly idemified 00 ^ graphic or in conjunction wah me laud of xrvice andysis output. Maps of me CMP network are rvaitable in me Coogation Mmagemeat Program dacusnatation, avillable from me Existing average weekday daily traffic (AWD'n should be identified for me CMP liob in me smdy am. Hittoric volume grown trends in the smdy ua should be shown. Conavlt me IoW jurisdiction, Gltraw, and Sm Bernudino Coussty for additiowl infortoation. C. Existing ievds of aervia. A laud of servim andysit must be condsscoed on ill existing segmeaw and imuaecdow on me CMP network potentiilly impacted by the project or plm (n defined by me thresholds in Setxion B). Urbm segments (i.e„ segnseots on roadways mat arc generilly sigsuiimd) do tar «quve xgmeot analysis. Segment rewiremats an normdly be determined by me atmlysis of lam requ'veoxon u imenactiom. Freeway maidine must be aoilyxed, and ramp/waving awlysis may be rewired at load discretion, if a ramp or waving problem ft amieipamd. CEaptu 2 of me CMP promo me aoxpuble LOS suemodologira, based on me 1955 Highway Capacity Maowl. Several ' xtMUe pacl;agea are rvailahle for ronductiog LOS anilyaia for aigwlized interaeaiow, freeways, and other types of roadways. TLO ao3ware paetage and venioo wed mwt bra identified. Normdly, the exittiog LOS andysis for imersectbw Nill be No wing OptIIDI7ed signil timing, since me fitture anilysis G4 Appmdfs C Son Bernardino County CMP will normally Deed to be run using optimized rioting. Signal timing optimization shtmid wmider pedestrian safety sod signal coordination requremeots. Minimum times shoud be no less than !0 seconds. Sanuuioo flow rues of 1,800 vehicles per hour of green (vpbg) for each through lute, 1,800 vphg for pcb exelwive right rum lane, 1,700 vphg for Doe exelmive left taro lane, and 3,200 vphg for nvo exclwive left mro lanes shwid be usumed for capaciry analysis. The above suuratioo flow rues are mmidered as the adjusted tamration flow rasp and in m case shall the adjmted sanuatioo flow rata of Me 1985 Highway Capacity Sottwaro bo allowed m go lower than the specified sutvuion flow rata, whm fidd den are Dot available. However, thue shall be oo rptriaioo on miaimttm suucation flow cup if awsal satwatioe flow rata ue rva0eble. Default Iost time is two tecottds per phau. Without local duo m show otherwix, a peak- hour factor of betwan 0.85 and 0.95 may be auumed. Varirtiom from thex value mwt be documented and jwtified. I.OS analyse should be fidd-verified so the the results ue rwotuDly mmittem witlt Observuion and etron in the addytis ace mote likely m be Aught. A brief cammeatuy on existing problem wren must be iocludad io this secton, brirtgiog existing problems m the attention of the readers. D. Related general plan issues. The rduiomhip m the geoenl plan should be ideuified. This section shoud provide geoalai background iaformuion from the Tntfic Cirwlatioo Element of the General Plan, including platy for the Wtimate camber of lanes, new roadways planed for We thturc. and other ioformatioo thrt provides a comeu for bow We proposed projett imszrdup wiW me future planned tnmportuion system. m. Future mnditiom. A. Tratim forecastr. (fie of the primary produce of the TIA is the otm>puiton of ttmtrc traffic mtditiom with ad without the project, The primary foretaste will be for the Clsff forecast year~(wmult the CMA for the moo cttrrwtly applicable forecast yon - currrnt forecast yen is 2010). If a project is pbesed over a devdopmrm period qtr the C7~fP fotxsut ytaQ, a buildoW foraast with yen 2010 backpou>d traffic mutt alx be provided. Than are two compotteatr of the foreeatt tbu goad m be oomidaed: background traffic and project traffic. Acceptable methodologla for thex foteartr aro deauibed below: The CMP requirs mu traffic operational proDlemt be mitigated m provide I.OS E or bener operation. If the local jurisdiction rcquim mitigation m a higher IAS, this takes precedence over the CMP requirements, Project TratTic Forecasts. Two basic altunatives ate avaiable for foretafdpg project traffic: 1. hfamrtl method - (3merue projaa trips wing rues from the fl'E Trip Geaecuion report. DistriMrreaod assign C-5 Appendls C Sun Berrmrdfrrn County CMP the trips based on the Iwtioo of the project relative m the remainder of the urban yea and oo the type of land uu. Rather than relying on pure judgment m develop We d'atriburion of project traffic, the Cumre year CMP model trip able should be obtained from SCAG m auist m making the distribution. The percentage distribution should be reasonably related m the loation of and the number of trips generated by zones surrounding Ne project C,omputet- assitted trip distribution and auigoment methods may be used u long u they reasonably represent the travel chuacteristics of the era io which the project is located. 2. Use of tonal model - Geate a wtu or zones thu repreeat the projert (if not uready aouined in the lain model). The CMP model may be uud if ta:w rotor ue created m represent the project ~[ is udikely mu the Chip model will urcaay have zones smut enough m represent the pcojem). The roes or ropes shoud include the enact representuion of driveway laratiom with aDtroid amators. A forocast of project traffic may be generated by conducting a horiron year assignment without the project and subtracting it from a horizon yeu assignment with We project. The di(ferena between the two auigDmeats represents the project traffic. It is impottam thu the driveway represemuiom be exact m product acaptabie awing tnovemem volumes. Some adjustmeon ro the rotting movement volumes may be Deeded, dependiDg oD the adetryary of this represtnutioD. I[ should be noted thu Ne above merltadologies may product different results, both in the generation of trips and the distribution of trips. However, both methods will have appiicuiou, deQending oD tbejurisdiaion and on the type sod size of project. Background Traffic Forocuts. Background traffic refers m all traffic other thaD the traffic assoniamd with the project ibdf. Several utertutives for forecasting background traffic are: 1. For optatmg dry atulysis -Use a[xeQted growth tam provided by the jurisdictioot iD which the analysis is m take plea. Fxh jurisdiction's growtb run should be used for iDtersectioDs and aegmmta within mu junidictwn. A table of growth ram may be obtained from the jurisdiaiom aDd muy also be doatmeamd in Wes aoouil (:Aff report. 2. For 6orixon yen -Cities and/or Couv[y should provide background forccatta or growth fatxon. Local aaddf may be used m geararc iDtaaection and acgmem forecasts diroctly, if a traflk rcfioemtart praas ~ PAY applied m maximize the quality a~ reasotuDlenesa of the krecau. Alternuivdy, the CAfP model may be ased m generam growth tacton by mbara. which may be applied w exifting ia0etaection and aegmem volumes. (dally, cities and/or me Cauoty should eaablish the baekgtound foreasb amwlly far use by project applineh. ,Project ttppiicaatt may obtain the batdtgtound [orxtttt from she city/twuaty whbtxn having m Product Dew forxa[s. Tbis approerh is Cfi Appmdik C San srrnarano Cowtty CMP intended m minimire woflia and debate over Me forecasts provided, es would occur if each applicant developed a completely new set of background. foreeuts Until Me city/county u in a position m produce these focecam on a routine basis, Mry may wish m me the «sults of Mt background forecurs from prior acapnble TIA spttm u the buffs [or background torxasu for other TIA reports. The separate forocasting of background traffic by earl TIA report prcparer is redundant, will ody create oonflicr among teports, and should be avoided by Me cirylenuory providing ate aotxptabte background Potucatt for use by all TIA report prepares. The availability of such forecasts should be established Defore initiating Me preparatbn of a TIA report. if the 0118 modd is being used u Me buffs for Me forecast, assume that the project is tat iaduded is Me CMP mold fbreeast (udeu it aaa be defutitively proven oMerwise). If ^ Iocal mold is being used, Me background traffic will be derived by subhacting Me project traffic from Me forecart where Me projax is already represened in Me madd. Where Me project is not represented itr Me model, Me background traffic can be directly derived from Me mold (wiM appropriam refinement m tnaiataie quality and rrmombleaess of Me forexasts). A Noce oo McModology for General Piam and Specific Plain: to Me case of analysis of getreral plan tevisioos/updates or specific plain, Me same approach is eppliad u above. HONNR, ME 'project' a be analyzed comists of Me diRerer>ce in land me btxwcn the previomly approved general plan and the proposed revision m the general plan. Udeu otherwise agreed by the local jurisdiction, the andysis must asuume Me maximum intensity of land uses allowed (.e., worst cue) on the panels m which the envision applies. AlI new speeifa plans must be analyzed u a project io toW, based on wont cue assttmipdom. Although general plan may ant identity specific access loeuiom, the analysis muu auume accros loatiom Mat arc «awmble, bued on the lowtioo and size of Me plan. B. Traffic added by project, general plan rcvisioduptlam, or specific plan. The tntxhads for geeeratiag atd distributing projat trips taus[ be wasistent wiM Me appropriate ttteModology listed above. The toW number of trips generated by the projcet must be specified by land use. The source of the trip generation rams mint be doatmented. Any auumed reductiom in trip geoeruioa ram, such a imeroal hips, and tramitffDM tedttcdom [taut be tksenmemed. Pau- by trips may 6e dlowed ody for mail uses and fast-fao0 rtstauratru. 7Le paa-by percmage and taMOdology of applyingpass-by bripa trout be enmiatem with Me eatfmarea and meModology cotrtaioed in the 17'E Trip f3eneratioo rtpoR. The muimum pa~omtage of intartral Mps it 10 peram, whirl most be jusdfied by having ~ a mkediue devdoptnent of sttfflclem tiff. In spaid calm, larger teduetiom may he allowed; ben MetO matt 6e ttagtmemed cad justiflad. Redutxiom for tritrsh or C-7 Appendts C San Berwrdiw Carmsy CMP C. D. TDM must be accompanied by an is 55. The facmr m derive a peak hour explanation of how the straegies will from the three-hour PM peak u 35. actually be implemented and may require a monimring program. Project E. Future levels of cervix with and without trips (inbound and outbound) mutt be project. identified on a graphic map for both Ne peak hour or hours being studied. Compute levels of cervix for CMP Industrial n5e5 mn$t 8150 Shaw die SCgmentt and Intersat106t bated On die estimated number and distribution of proxdurm in the 19g5 Highway truck trips for the same hour. Tha Capacity Mamul and mbsequent bazis fnr the generuion and distribution modifications, where applicable. Refer of trips must be idwtified. m the promdmes adopted in Chapter 2 of the CMP and -the »sumptiom Transit and TDM wtuideratiom. specifitl in stt[ion H.C of this appendix. Copiea of We volumes, Tramit and tnvel demand management intersection Eeomary, capaciry analysis strategies ue a consideration in many worksheets, and all rdevam assumption developmw[ projects. Requvemems must be included ss appetlicea m the within each jurisdiction arc coataiotl in TIA report, It should 6e nottl Wss the the local TDM ordiaaxa, m be adopted v!e ratio and implied laud of service by each local jurisdiction u put of the thu can fx output by travel demand CMP requircmrnts. Examples of items models arc different from We level of ro include are location of vanit stops in aervia analysis presctibtl in this relationhip m the proposed project, cation. The capatibes used in the designation of ridesharing caodioator, model are not typically the same posting of information on transit routes apathies ss used io the capacity and ridesharing information, provision atWysis. of transit passes, etc.. F. Desttiptioo of projected level of cervix Traffic forecssts with and without the problems. projat. Idemify rmultiog levels of cervix for Provide s rAmparison of traffic volumea ioterscetiom and segmenu, as with and withom the projat for the appropriate, on a map for applicable appropriate peak hour or hour. The pack hours, Dattihe in the a# the compuiwn mart be providtl on a map tuturc of expected level of cervix showing lick volumes by direction. All problemr. Describe any othu impaou CMP arterial links with SO or more peak thu rho project may ale Gave oo the hour project trips (two-way) wad CMP rotlwry network, particululy freewry lido with 100 or more peak atxaas tequiremerm. hour project trips (two-way) must be ~ _ shown, The fatxor m derive a peak G. Project xt[tribution m tool new Dour from the two-hour AM peak period volume (foreesst minor existing oa atulyand links. G8 Appsndta C San Bsrnardfw County CMP Compute the ratio of traffic gcaerated in coosulution with the local by theproposed davelopmeat m~me mtal jurisdiction. Measures m addreu laal new traffic generated beiweea the neada that aze indepeodem from the existing condition and ftnersn yea for CMP network may De included m the each malyzed link. The purpose of this 77A report, or ~ may be provided calcdation h to ideality the proportion sepuaWy. Comdtthe laal jurisdiction of volume increase that can be attributed m determine «quuemeott which may be m the proposed project. 'Ibis will be a beyond the requiremeno of the CMP. necessary component of any deficieory 'The informarioo required is this pan of plain prepared under the Cb1P at a leer the I7A Report is described 6dow. date. The calculation is ro be anducted on a link buffs for all CMP lido A. Other traosportatios improvements andyrad [or all applicable peak houa. dreadyprogrammed (shodd be arsumed 'Ihe results mry be shown oo ^ map or in forecast). in a table. 8. Roadwry improvements needed to N. Projem mitigation. maimaio CMP level of servim snndud. 71te mitigation of project imptets is these shodd ioelude m evaluation o[ designed m idemify paeotlal level of imeralction mro lanes, si~oaliyatbn, aetvice problems and m address them signal ooacd'mation. and lick lace before they aaWly scar. This will additiom, at a minimum. If a freeway also provide a framework for is involved, lam tequitemems anti ramp negotiations between the local tread ro vulva level of service jurisdiction and the projax developer. deficieotia must be examined. Prior The CMA wul cwt be involved m that studies on the fame aectiom mry be negotiations udeu requested by a local famished m the ptcpazer of the 77A, jurisdiction. Impacts bryond the anti surL stadia may be ro[ereooed if bouodazia of the jurisdiction must ba they do, is fact, provide the necasary idmtifitd is the same fashion m impscta mMigdon for the propmad project. wlthln the juflrll1ct10ml h00[Mhny. HOweVR, IhG CalettlatlOn Of paeemage hopaued local ageocia OWide the of amribtttion Of WC project m the bouedary will be provided an growth io traffic mart still be provided opportunity for review of the 71A for the appropriate peak hours, m report. Negotiation whh thine outside destxihad earlier. If the physical or jurisditxiom and with Caitrant h a environmental eooatuints make possible outcome, depsmding on Wa mitigation udikdy io order that the magnitude anti aware of the impsar. contribution mry be mad m impmve For the CMP, the mitigation must level of tarvioe elsewheee on the bring the roadwry inn anformma system. The puffin of rdereoeiog a wide the I.OS standards establahed for pteviaWy mnductad lady is m avoid Ne CMP. However, local agercia otry, umecrosaty duplication a[ dhow oo the require conformance to hither same sectlom of roadwry. Copies of standuds, and these must be aniderod previomly wndttaed telavam amdia m C-9 Appendix C San Be»mnlino County CMP the area may be ohtained Crom We local neighboring jurisdictions and Ciltrans. jurisdictions or the CMA, induAing any It does not imply any legal respoasibiliry pleas resulting from theamuil modeling or formula for motribuuons m runs for the CMP. mitigations. If a mitigation is identified u naessary m bring a deficieury inm C. Othtt improvements needed m maintain mnformana with the levd of service the LOS standard. standard, bu[ physical or mvtroamental mastraims make the improvement In some rases, additional trauit and impractical, ao equivilent mmribution TDM strategies beyond what was m the should be considered m improve the origiuil assumptions may be oewsary LOS dsewhae oo the system. m provide ao adequue mitigation. Theo must be described and the method F. Rdatiomhip to other dements. for implementation mttst be d'ucussed. While Ne tneasmes required m address D. Level of service with improvements. a'v quality problems ue not requ'tred for the T1A Report, t6ay may ba required u The levd of servim with improvements part of t CEQA roview. The TIA must be computed and shown on a map Report may be integrued with or hble along with the traffic levd of mYtronmeoul documents preparod for service without itnprovemenu. Dday CEQA rogttirmeoia. This is at the values, freeway volume/rapatiry ratios, discretion of the local jurisdiction. or othu meuura of levd of service must be included in the results (mold be V. Cotmlusiom and raot[wendrtioas. N an appettdix) along with the letter designation. A. Summary of proposed mitigetiom and mats. E. Cost estirttates. Provide a summary of the impacts, The costs of mitigating deficiencies must proposed mitigations, and the msu of be estimated for deficiencies thu ocau the mitiNtiom. A cost esumau fir the either within or outside the boundaries proposed mitiyatiom tntttt 6a included. of the jurisdiction. The costs must be Generalized unit costs will be available ideatifiad separaWyfor earh jurisdiction from eiWu Caltram, the locil and for Ciltraat roadways. Prior juriadktlon, or We CMA. 7Le soura studies wad cost estimates by Calttam of the unit coat estimates toed must be and other jurisdiction may be specified in the TIA report. referenced. Used Wgdhtt with the anilysit eoaducted in Salon IDG, this B. Other reoommeadation. will provide ao apprositnation of project contribution to the needed List soy other remtameadation that improvements, This athmte is should be btou{htld the aaeotion of the preparod for discuuion purposes with laeiljurisdiction,WeCMA,orGltran. the local jurisdiction and with ' Thu may include anticipated problems C-t0 Appendtr C San Brrrordirto County CMP beyond the forecsst year or on Qortions of the network trot analyzed. Summary List of Typical Figures and Tables w Ide Included m a 7U Report: • Project location and study area (map) • ProjeR size by land sue (table) • Trips generated by Imd uu for AM and PM weekday peak hours of adjacent strew traffic wad for daily traffic inbound and outbound (able) and other applinble peak hours • List of other planned transportation improvements affating the project • Existing intersection and link volumes and levels of savitx (map) • Distribution and sssigament of projeu tries (msP) • Forecsst traffic without projetx and with project for applicable peak hours (map or able) • Levels of service withom project and with project (map or able) • Improvemwts raryirod to mitigate project impact (map and/or able) • Ratio of project trafTC m new traffic (new traffc meant the dlffereoee ~ , baweea existing and fottssst) 00 analyzed links (map or nhle) • Improvement vests by jurisdiaioo and for Caltram roadways C-11 ~ AOprndu C San Petnordnse Coruuv CMP ATTACHMl7d!' I TO APPENDIX C S(fbfMARY OF ANALYSES ASSUhiP17ONS FOR THE CMP TRAFFIC QwffACT ANALYSIS GUmE[JIiFS r Methodology - 1985 HCM operuioeil aoslysis. Assumptiow - Optimized sigoil timiog/phuiug for future sigoil auilysis, udeu assumed m be iu s eoordiusxd system. iY svhieh wu estimated swul ryele hm~h is used. The maximum ryde leogtlt for a single si6wlized iuter3eRioo or tyatem should tarmilly be l30 aecoads. - 10 second minimum phase time, iucludiag ehao;e imerval. - Averaje asrivils, udess a eoocdiYated Siswl system diaatea otherwise. - Ideal lane ridth (12 tact). - 2 Second Iost Ume/phase. - "Required' solution if aoilytis by CAPSSI. - Exclwive t1{ht turn lace is assumed m exist H pmurmt Ls Hide eaougb to permit a Sepuste rim turq evm if h is not striped. - A full satuntiou flow rat0 tJY be asuumed for ere extra hme provided just ou the up3tream of the ler..w._d~ m!ty 3f M+s t•••• •~ omesds r! !ta<r 600 P. dosvuwom of the hsmrseaion (or m the next dosrmtrew imusattiou). - PHF ~ 0.95 for 2010 auilysis. - TIIO Isoe Ytii Va[I0a facmr may al3o be SC[ C 1.00 Nhle the V/C dtie far fhe lane group sPPrnkhe3 I.Ur as Ianea feud m he ruoK equally utilimd ie SueL Slmatlow. SeturatioY Flotvs Case (i) When field saturation flow nW and any spacial iutaseaiou cbsrscteriStisa arc tat available, the follosviot adjusted suuratiou flow cares are tecommeaded for Level of Service analysb. - Exclwive thrn : 1800 vphgpi - F-xclwive left 1700 vph~pl - Exdwive ri`ht 1800 vph~pl - F.udwive double IeR : 1600 vph{pl - Exelwive triple IeR 1500 vph~l or leu C-12 Appsrsdlz C Barr 6cna,d;,,o County CMP ,dgl4: If Highway Capacity Sokwaze is used, elt the fattors in the samratioo flow adjustment warkshea shauld be wrratxed ro I.00. Cau (ii) Field saturuioo flow taro should be used if they are available and soy spaial traffic or geometric characteristia should also be taken inro accovut if known m affect trattic flow. F~ama - Capuiry of 2,200 vehiGesfioudlane - S% tracks Includes wets, bow and RV's) - Peak hour factor of .98 for congested arena and .90 - .92 for leas wngestod areas - Dvatiowl distributbn of SS % and 45 %, if ming madirectiottd volumes from Caltraas volume book - Design speed of 70 mph - Volumes used from Caltrw' aawal volume book am assumed m 6e PM peak Lour. AM peak maidine volumes aswmed at 90% of PM peak, if using Glbnns volume book 1985 HCM far 2-wsy stop 1990 Michad Kyte Method for 4-way stop (ava0able through Mc Tram, Uttiveniry of Florida Two [-~ FliehwaVS: mao0tf 8 HCM Terrain - Moutroimtss: grade > 6% Rolling: 3 - 6% up and down grades Flu: 0 - 3 % up and down grades Area Type - Runt SuMuhao R of tw passing zone: b0% Pot nsourttainous ~0% far rolling 20% for flu Volume wmidered u nvo wty volume Peak hour furor depends on two way volume (['able 83 HCM) % of RV's ranges from t - 5% C-t3 AOPa+~-a C San Bernardino Corauy CMP Lane widths 10 - I2 [t. Deign speed of 50 - 65 mph, depends upon spaific loca[iom Multilave Hiehwsvs: New meter 7 H(7N Capazity - 2,200 vph 85th percentile speed Peak hour factor .85 • rural .87 • .92 suburban Peak hour directional volume = 60R, of bidirectional volume Roiea-Relaxed Assumotom 1) Maximum internal trip percentage is 10% uoleu bigha can be justified 2) Pass by trips - Retail uses and fast food restattnots ody - Ux fl'E procedures m estimate percenmge - For analysis ac entry points issm site, driveway volume is um reduced (i.e., tip gweruioa ram is still the same). Rather, trips are redistibuted based oo the auumd ptevaltmt diroctiom of pass-by trips (see rerotrsmended fIE procedurc). ' 3) Reductions for transit or TDM arc a maximum of IOR vales higher can be justified. I) If a new taffic generating davelopstsem project (other than a single family rcsideotial unit) within A Federally desigtsated urbaoired area abuts a stem highwry or abut a highway that ivtersect a stem highway within 500 fact of that inmcsectioo, the local jurisdiction a which the development occurs must rarity Caltam and the CMA. 2) The 77A procedures wilt be reviewed at Ietst every six momhs. Fornard mtssmestts m the I;MA. 3) Industrial rues must show esthnned Dumber sod distribution'of truck trips for peak haura. 4) Inmtseaiom wtll be comidered deficient if the critical v/e rata equals or exceeds 1.0, evm if the level of service defined by the delay value is below the defused LOS smodard. 5) All the romputu-gevented taffic forecasts should be rcfined for use io 71A Reports m provide the best estiosam of furore volumes possible. c; \pmjew\ 13901tiyw~m C-l4 ApprndLs C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA :; STAFF REPORT ,.,,,,; - ~; DATE: March 3, 1993 TO: City Council and City Manager FP.OM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Gary Varney, Maintenance Superintendent Streets./~~ b Storm Drains SUBJECT: APPROVAL FOR THE LEASE PORCHASE OF (1) CONVENTIONAL TRIICX CAH-CHASSIS WITH REGENERATIVE AIR STREET SWEEPING COMPONENTS FROM DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL THOCX SALES, INC. OF SAN BERNARDINO, CA., IN THE AMOONT OF $22,389.84 A YEAR, FOR FIVE (6) YEARS, TO BE FONDED FROM GAS TAX ACCOONT 09-4647-7045. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award the lease purchase of one (1) Conventional Truck Cab-Chassis with Regenerative Air Street Sweeping Components to Dieterich International Truck Sales Inc., cf San Bernardino, California as the lowest responsible bidder. Lease purchase over five years (S) for the amount of twenty two thousand three hundred eighty nine and eighty four cents, ($22,389.84). The purchase to be funded from Gas Tax account 09- 4647-7045 and is budgeted. BACBGROOND/ANALYSIS On January 26, 1993 at 3,:00 P.M. bid proposals Eor the lease purchase of one (1) Conventional Truck Cab-Chassis with Regenerative Air Street Sweeping Components were received and opened in the City Purchasing oEf ice. Of the five proposals sent out all were received. Haaker Equipment Company, of Pomona, Ca., G.C.S. INC. of Fullerton, Ca., Inland Empire White GMC of Riverside, CA. all were no bid, they were unable to meet minimum specification requirements. The Bid received from Dieterich international truck sales, INC. of San Bernardino is in compliance by meeting or exceeding the City specifications on the performance safety and equipment standards expected. K~) Approval for Lease Purchase March 3, 1993 Page 2 The purchase of the above sweeper is to replace Unit M692, a three wheel FMC 3000 Regenerative air sweeper. All of our FMC's have the equivalent of over 300,000 miles of service on them, hard miles due to the demographics of our city, (steep grades). The FMC's are costly to service and parts more costly to obtain due to ownership change of company and relocation. Respectfully submitted; ~~ WJO/gv c)`t t;ri~x vr~ xnN~nv ~u~nmvni;n STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Wtlltam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Shelley Maddox, Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM URIEL GRACIANO SANCHEZ, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED SOUTH OF 26TH STREET, NEST OF CENTER AVENUE. IECOMMENDJITIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the sub,lect real property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing the same to record. eiNacsMalMg/AMALrsis The developer, Urte' Graciano Sanchez, of 8736 Center Avenue, south of 7.fith Street, requested a bull ding permit for a single family residence. Ailey improvemens are a condition of issuing the building permit. The City does not require said Improvements to be built at this time. Therefore, the Aevelaper has subm/tteA a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the construction of the alley improvements. A copy of the Agreement 1s available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, ~`%~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:SM:dlw Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 93 ~ 037 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERtt IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM URIEL GRACTANO SANCHEZ AND AOTHORiZiNG THE MAYOR AND CITY CLEIIX TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, adopted Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to estab~ish requirements for contructi on of publ lc improvements in con,l unction with building permit Issuance; and WHEREAS, the install atlan of pavement and concrete gutters established as prerequisite to Issuance of bull ding permit fora single family residence at 8736 Center Avenue has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Uriel Gractano Sanchez. NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA HEREBY RESOLVES to accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. ~' /~Y+~ STREET CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIIQEF,RING DIVISION W V J C CfY ~ ~' ~ V /,' V h 4 N S7~Fi CEnr£k iWE ~ V N READ PkfPERTY C/EN AMT ~i uR~Ef. loa i'gn SgncNE1 ~~:~ a,St" 37KEET CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Ni111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL AND IXECUTION OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT N0. 019 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STATE AGREEMENT N0. OB-5420 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE CONSTRUCTION DHASE INCLUDING ADVERTISEMENT, ANARD AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE REHABILITATION AND MIDENING OF HAVEN AVENUE FROM CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. THE SUPPLEMENT SETS THE FEDERAL PORTION OF THE PROJECT AT 5346,152.00 AND THE CITY'S PORTION AT 544,848.00 WITH THE PROVISION TO INCREASE THE CITY'S PORTION SHOULD THE NEED ARISE. FUNDING FOR THE SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT SHALL BE FROM LOCAL MEASURE I FUNCS, ACCOUNT N0. 32-4637-9112. RECOMIEMDATIOM It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve and execute the attached Resolution that authorizes the execution of Program Supplement No. 019 to Local Agency - State Agreement for Federal Aid Protects No. OB-5420 and a certified copy of said Resolution along with the executed original copies of the executed Supplement be sent to the State of California for their execution. BACKGRWND/AMALTSIS Attached herewith are the duplicate original copies of the above subtect Program Supplement No. 019 to Local Agency - State Agreement for Federal Atd Protects No. 08-5420. This program supplement provides for the construction phase including Advertisement, Award and Administration of the widening and rehabilitation of Haven Avenue from Civic Center Drive to Foothill Boulevard, which consists of the installation of bus bays, reconstruction and overlaying of existing pavement, striping, utilities and signal relocation necessary for the street widening. The supplement sets the Federal portion of the protect at 5346,152.00 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SUPPLEMENT N0. 019 MARCH 3, 1993 PAGE 2 and the C1ty's portion at f44,848.00 with the the City's portion should the need arise. The limited to the amount shown. Funding for the shall be from Local Measure I funds, Account No. Respectfully submi d, ~' ~~ % ltiv~ Nilliam J. O'Neil ~ City Engineer WJO:JSay Attachments provision to increase Federal portion to be Supplement Agreement 32-4637-9112. W RESOLUTION N0. g7J.O3~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGq, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT N0. 019 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STATE AGREEMENT N0. OS-5420 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE INCLUDING ADVERTISEMENT, AWARD AND ADMINISTRATION OF THE REHABILITATION AND WIDENING OF HAVEN AVENUE FROM CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (herein- after referred to as "Local Agency"), has for Its consideration and execution, the Program Supplement Na_ 019 to Locai Agency -State Agreement No. 08-5420 for the construction phase including Advertisement, Award and Administration of the Rehab111 tats on and widening of Haven Avenue from Civic Center Drive to Foothill Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Transportation, District Office 9 (herein-after referred to as "State") Processes and monitors Federally funded protects; and WHEREAS, as a condition to payment of Federal funds for said pro,t acts, the Local Agency shall approve and execute said Program Supplement No. 019; NON, THEREFORE, THE CtTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Authorize the Execution of Supplement No. 019 to Local Agency - State Agreement No. 08-5420 Por the construction phase including Advertisement, Award and Administration of the Rehab111tat1on and Widening of Naven Avenue from C1v1c Center Drive to Foothill Boulevard in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County. 2. To authorize the Mayor to sign said Supplement and direct the City Clerk to attach a certified copy of this Resolution, as well as type in the Resolution number and date 1n the blank of the third block of said supplement and for the return of the original copies of said supplement to the State of California Department of Transportation along with the certified copy of this Resolution. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Local Agency shall also comply with the "Special Covenants or Remarks" attached to said supplement Including: RESOLUTION N0. REHABILITATION d NIDENIN6 OF HAYEN AVENUE FROM CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MARCH 3, 1993 PAGE 2 1. All maintenance, Involving the Dhysical condition and the operation of the improvements, referred to 1n Article VI Maintenance of the aforementioned Master Agreement will be performed by the Local Agency at regular intervals or as required for efficient operation of the completed improvements. 2. The Local Agency will advertise, award, and administer this protect and wttl obtain the State's concurrence prior to either award or retectton of the Contract. 3. The Local Agency agrees the payment of Federal funds will be limited to the amounts approved by the Federal Highway Administration in the Federal-Aid Protect Agreement (PR-2)/Detail Estimate, or its modification (PR-2A) or the FNM-76, and accepts any increases 1n Local Agency funds as shown on the Finance or Bid Letter or its modification as prepared by the Division of Local Streets and Roads. 4. In executing this Program Supplement Agreement, Locai Agency hereby reaffirms the Nondiscriminatlan Assurances" contained in the aforementioned master Agreement for Federai-Aid Program. 5. Nhenever the local agency uses a consultant on a cost plus basis, the local agency 15 required to submit a post audit report covering the allowably of cost payments for each individual consultant or sub-contractor incurring over 525,000 on the protect. The audit report must state the appllcabie cost principles utilized by the auditor in determining allowable costs as reference 1n CFR 49, part 18, subpart C-22, Allowable Costs. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of march 1993. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: enn s u yor ATTEST: e ra ams, er 41 U1'1'Y UN' 1tAN UtiV UUCAMVNIiA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1993 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II ~~T SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION FOR TRACT-12895 LOCATED ON THE NEST SLOE OF BAKER AVENUE BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARRON ROUTE, SUBMITTED BY RANCHO CITILAND DEVELOPMENT It is recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resotutton, accepting the subJect agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Cierk to sign said agreement. BACKBROUMD/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the Dub11c improvements for Tract 12895 were approved by the City Council on February 2, 1989, 1n the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: f430,000 Labor and Material Band: f215,000 The developer, Rancho Citiland Developeent, 1s requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement, in order to complete the remaining 25% of the improvements, Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully su ed, G2~ Milllam J. O'Neil City Engineer MJO:SMG;Iy Attachments ENVIRONMENT CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC. C LAND USE PLANNING CONSULTANTS post Office Box 5 ~ Glendora, California 91740 (818) 963-8465 / (818) 963.0712 January 26, 1993 Mr. Steve M. Gilliland Public Works Inspector Engineering DiViSion The Crty of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Subject: Request for 12 Month Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 12895 and Reconsideration of Request to Reduce Bond Amounts to Reflect In Place Improvements Dear Mr. Gilliland: In accordance with your letter of 1-7-93 and on behalf of our client, Rancho Citiland Development, we respectfully request that the Improve- ment Agreement be extended i2 months to allow completion of the pro- 3ect. We are pleased to provide the requisite 3 copies oz the Improvement Agreement Extension signed and notorized with a check in the amount of 5251.00. As you appreciate from our letter of 12-9-92 and the analysis pre- pared by the Engineer of Record, L. D. King, only 5118,000 of im- provements including internal streets, curb, gutter, sidewalk and sewer manhole adjustments need to be completed. It is ar:tispated that these improvements will be completed before the end of the year. Building Permits for buildings 14 to 27, comprised of 47 condominium units were renewed on 1-14-93 to maintain vested construction draw- ings. All of the pads for these buildings have been installed, struc- tural hardware approved and are ready to be frarned and roofed. The mainline sewer, water, storm drain electrical and CATV are installed and only the laterals need to be extended and connectea to the pads. As related to you during our conversation oI 1-6-93, we desire to reduce the bond amounts for the remaining improvements inorder to reduce the amount of collateral that the Bank is currently i~o lding on the property. She Building Division substantially reduced the grading bond by 75 percent of the orginal amount. CCWD :educed the bond amount for water and storm ci:ains oy 80 percent. Engineering still retains over $130,000 of funds advanced uy the developer for a portion of a master planned storm drain facility located west of Baker Avenue between Arrow Route and Foothill Blvd. 'h7 We respectfully request a 12 month extension to the Improvement Agree- ment and reconsideration of our 12-9-92 request to reduce the bona amounts of $430,000 and $215,000 to an equitable amount which reflects tr~ose improvements installed inorder to relesse property collateral to facilitate tiie ref irancing and completion of the project. We look forward to working with you on ibis request and to receiving your favorable and timely response. 5'ncerely, Guy illiams, Jr. Pre iae t cc Rancho Citiland Development RESOLUTION N0. 93- 03 ! A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGP.EEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROYEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12895 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 3, 1993, by Rancho Citiland Development as deveioper, for the improvement of public right-of-way ad,iacerrt to the real property specificaily described therein, and generally located at the west side of Baker Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and sub,~ect to the terms thereof, is to be done in confunction with the development of said Tract 12895; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the Ctty Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that satd Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. O1'1'Y UN' iCANGHU CUCA:1dONGA STAFF REPORT GATE: March 3, 1993 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Nilltam J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector IG~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT IXTENSION FOR TRACT 13851, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NILSON AVENUE AND CANISTEL AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 1NC. RELOMIN:INIATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the sublett agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACK6ROIIMD/ANALYSIS improvement Agreement and I~rovement Security to guarantee the construction of the public ira„rovements for Tract 13851 were approved by the City Council on January 3, 1990, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: (1,042,000 Labor and Material Bond: S 5'21,000 The developer, Pacific International Development tnc., 1s requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement. The improvements continue to be on hold due to the economic conditions. Copies of the Improvement Agreem«°nt Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, ~~ c~~~ Nilltam J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:IY Attachments ~~ PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL ~"~_~~~j1 DEVELOPMENT, INC. A SuOYtlWy d PACIFIC CONSTRUOTgN CO., LTO. January 22, 1993 Mr. Steve M. Gilliland Community Development Department Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Re: Request for Extension of Improvement Agreement for Tract 13851 Dear Mr. Gilliland: In accordance with your instructions, enclosed please find three (3) fully executed and notarized Improvement Agreement Extension fozms and a check in the amount of $251.00 for processing the application. In addition, please find a copy of Eousing Marketing Report pub.liahed by The Meyers Group for your reference. Pacific International Development, Inc. hereby requests a one year extension of the Improvement Agreement ae a result of continued depressed housing merket due to the economic downturn we have experienced for the past two years. We have no alternntive but continue to place the project on hold. According to the attached report, there still remains little or no demand for homes in the price ranging from $410,000 to $505,000 which we prcposed to build. To date, we have completed rough grading, storm drains, all undergroun3 utilities, approximately 908 of curbs and gutters, and the south side block well. Remaining work will include street paving, final grading, landscaping, trail fencing, and street lighting. It is estimated that the remaining work could be completed within three months once the project is reactivated on the condition that housing merket will improve eignif icantly. All necessary precautions have been taken to control wind and storm e~oeions. If you have any questions and/or need additional information, please feel free to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, ~Jn ~~ Daniel Zau Vice President encl 93B E. Sevm,eenM St. 9en4 Ana, CA 92701 TN: ,714) $4,•8927. F9A: v,,) 588-,841 47 RESOLUTION N0. 9.3 " O'~O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT IXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13851 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 3, 1993, by Pacific International Development, Inc., as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the northeast corner of M11son Avenue and Canistel Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described 1n said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of sold Trect 13051; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Counc9l of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1993 T0: Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Ni111am J. O'Neil, Ctty Engineer BY: Steve M. G11111and, Public Norks Inspector II~7~~ SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13945 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CITATION BUILDERS RECONEN811TION It is recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and Ctty Clerk to sign said agreement. BACK6ROUMD/AMALVSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the constructton of the public improvements for Tract 13945 were approved by the City Council on January 16, 1992, to the fo11ow1ng total amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5659,000 Labor and Material Bond: f329,500 The developer, Citation 8uiiders, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement, due to the slow exonomic conditions. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the C1ty Cierk's Office. Respectfully submi d, N1111am J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:Iy Attachments N 'r~ January 12, 1993 ' Mr. Steve M. Gilliland Public Works Inspector City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Dear Mr. Gilliland, Our Improvement Agreement for Tract 13945 is set to expire on January 15, 1993. We would like to request an extension of the Improvement Agreement for this Tract. As ism sure you are aware the current economic climate has negatively impacted our ability to sell homes and is therefore delaying the completion oP this project. Approximately 70~ of the Improvements covered by the improvement Agreement are complete, with only the sidewalk, street lights, Street Improvements and landscape on Highland Ave, and Pinal asphalt sap remaining to ba completed. We are currently forecasting that at the current rata of sales, house construction and the improvements should be complete around the middle of 1994. I would like to request the agreements be extended to December 31, 1994. Thank you for your assistance with this matter. Should your have any further questions or require additional information please contact me a 714) 258-1300. Sincer ly, c t A. A len Director of construction 15101 RedhlN pJCnIM, SUlte 100, nntln, G1926B0 t7M125&1300, FAX (714125&1475 RESOLUTION N0. ~J-0~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 7NE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROYEMENT AGREEMENT E%TENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13945 NHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on March 3, 1993, by Citation Builders as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adiacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at the southeast corner of East Avenue and Highland Avenue; and NHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subJect to the terms thereof, is to be done in conJunction with the development of said Tract 13945; and NHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Inprovement Agreement Extension and said hererbyeauthorizedito signnsaidheImprovement AgreeyiaentpExtension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the Ctty Clerk to attest thereto. 51 CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 3, 1993 i0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lan, AICP, City Manager FROM: M1111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector II~~'~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR PARCEL IMP 11852, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF UTICA AVENUE AND ARRON ROUTE RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Parcel Map 11952 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and /t is recommended that City Council accept said Improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the Ctty Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bonds in the amounts of 5680,000.00, ;30,000.00 and 5206,000.00. BACKGROUIU/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 11852 - located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Utica Avenue DEVELOPER: Barton Development 10621 Civic Center Drive Ra~ho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Arrow Rte. Edison Ct. Utica Ave. Faithful Performance Bond (Street) f680,000 f30,000 5206,000 Respectfully 5ubmittgd, 1 ~ I/ Ctty Engineer N1111am J. O'Neil ~ /'VVVnA_// NJO:SMG:sd Attachment 52 RESOLUTION N0. ~ ' ~a- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANG40 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 11952 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 11852 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and NHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be flied, certifying the Mork complete. NOM, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. uia c yr nnivr.riv uu~,n,nvivvn STAFF REPORT , DATE: March 3, 1993 T0: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICD, City Manager FROM: N1111am J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Norks Inspector I~ SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROYEiIENTS, RELEASE OF LETTE~R--OF CREDIT AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR 10418 AND 10438 VIVIENDA STREET, LOCATED ON VIVIENDA STREET NEST OF HAVEN AVENUE The reQulred street improvements for 10418 and 10438 Vivlenda Street have been completed 1n an acceptable manner, aM it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Letter of Credit in the amount of f21,800. BACKGRWID/ANALYSIS 10418 and 10438 Vivlenda Street - iocated an Vivlenda Street west of Haven Avenue DEVELOPER: Peter Smits 11251 Jersey Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit (Street) f21,800 Respectfully subm d, ~~~~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer NJO:SMG:sd Attachment RESOLUTION N0. 9~' O'~.3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 10418 AND 10438 VIYIENDA STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORK NHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for 10418 and 10439 Vlvienda Street have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and IrtIEREAS, a Notice of Conpletion is required to be filed, certifying the rrork complete. NON, THEREFORE, the City Louncll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the cork 1s hereby accepte4 and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion rlth the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 55 01IDIlFf[JCE NO. 507 AN ORDII~NCE OF THE CITY ODlRK'II, OF Tf~ CPPY OF RANCHO C[J(7~TkN~A, C4LIF~dlIA, ADDING SECPIOfI 12.08.025 TD THE RANCHO CUC7ITLEJCaA M(diICIPAL OODE PYSiTA1N11JG 70 EXII4p1TOLI OF ~~~ AND HIGH4U~YS DIDICATION THE CP1Y OOONCII, OF THE CITSC OF FAN(}i0 COCAMONGA DOES }43iffiY OIB.IAIN AS F0Id17,VS: SFX.TLON 1: Section 12.08.025 of the Fand» Cucamonga tamicipal Code is hereby added in ~mrds and figures, as follows: 12.08.025 Streets and Hiahwavs - Ds3ic~tion Exoeotions. The provisions of Section 12.08.020 shall not apply to the followiig: A. Alterations which are required to kriiy a luit,ti ~ or stru[.ture iiR:o caepliance with goverxvment code as determined by the City Engineer-; B. Maintenance aril/or rewnstrziction of a single family residence provided the total cost does not exceed fifty percent of the fair market value of the existing single family residence; c. Arry addition or emulative additions, within asixty-month period, to an existing single-family residence, provided that such additiw~ or additias do not exceed a total area of six hundred fifty square feet; D. construction of garages, block walls, carports, storage buildings, patio covers, swimming pools, spas and similar structures accessory to a single-family residence; and E. Where dedication of the ~anda~ rightbf-way is i~ractical due to existing physical constraints as det<,-mirat by the City Engineer. The City Engineer may require dedication not withstanding the above exc~tions if the City Engineer dMerm' there is a specific connection betwPrn the pro ect j and the need for street dedication. Any such decision of the City Engineer shall be appealable to the City Council pursuant to all procedtses which are applied to Conditional tine Permit appeals. SFXTION 2: The City Council declares that, should anry provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Oxdilrance be rendered or declared invalid by any final east action in cast of jurisdiction, ar by mason of any preemptive legislative, the zaiainimg provisiore, sections, paragraphs, senrtenoes, and words of this Orcliraroe shall remain in full force and effect. SF%.TION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk Ball cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Vallev Daily Mori , a newspaper of gemsal cirwlation published in the city of Rancho Cucanrxga. U 1'1'Y Vf' KANUHV UUUAMVN IiA .-- ~`~ t'>r.~.1~ STAFF REPORT . DATE: ;larch 3, 1993 ;~ ~~ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICPr City Managet FROM: Brad Bu11eI, City Ylannet BY: Oan Coleman, Principal PlanneY SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ABSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 92-01 CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMGN GA - A request to amend Title 17, Chaptet 17.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding parking requirements within shopping centers. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission recommends approval. H1ICRGRDOY7D In 1991, the City amended its parking regulations to rzquire "one-size- fits-all" parking spaces. Two of the developers who participated in the amendment process also suggested changes to the way the City calculates parkiny requirements for shopping centers. Mughea Investments and Lewis Homes Management Corporation offered to fund an independent study by a transportation engineer. The Planning Comnlssion directed staff to add the item to the Planning Division Work Program. The City Council approved the contract with P & D Technologies to prepare the report. AIULYSIS The Shopping Center Pat king Requirements Study (see attached) supports the developeta' request to modify the existing ordinances. Tha proposed amendment would increase the base parking requirement from 4 spaces per 1,000 square fret to a flat rate of 5 spaces per 1,000 equate feel with a certain percentage of restaurant and office oast allowed without additional parking. For existing centers, the amendment Would establish a parking requirement of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. By estab li shinq a flat rate, the amendment simplifies the calculation of parking requirements. A detailed discueaion of the amendment is contained in the attached Planning Commission staff report and minutes. 57 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DCA 92-01 - PARKING REQUIREMENT AN ENOMENT March 7, 1993 Page 2 Staf£ has completed Parts i and II of the Initial Study and did not identify any adverse environmental impacts which could result from this amendmeni• Therefore, the issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. Respect submit c Brad Bu er City Planner BB:DC:ep Attachments: Planning Coamiasion Staff Report - Janaury 13, 1993 Minutes of Planning Com~isalon Rearing - Januazy 13, 1993 Exhibit "A" - May 15, 1991, Memorandum from Developers Exhibit "B" - perking Study Exhibit "C" - Addendum to Parking Study Exhiblt "D" - Letter from Ruqhea Inveetmenis ?lanninq Commission Resolution No. 93-08 recommending approval of Development Code Amendment 92-H1 City Council ordinance for Development Code Amendment 92-01 JO Mr. emsn suggested a send it ion be added that adequate security lighting bo provided all sides of the building. Chairman McNiel r netl the public hearing to see if the condition was acceptable to the eppli t. Mr. Colombezo stated the tend itr was acceptable, Hot ion: Moved by Melchor, seconded Chitiea, to adapt the reeOlution approving Conditional U9e Permit 92-30. Mot carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHE , ALLETTE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY -carr ie N. pANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Title 31, Chc)ter 11.12 0[ the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding perking requiremant• uiihin chopping centers. Staff recamnende issuance of a Negative DocLaration. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated that P S D Tachnologiee had conducted the parking study and Chuck Spagno la from the Lr office would make a brief preuntat ion to iha Commies ion. Chuck Spaqnola, P 6 D TechnOlOgiee, 650 Eaet Xoepiiality Lane, 1250, San Bernardino, described how the perking study was dove loped. Chairman McNiel noted that tea stutly recommended five spaces per 1000 square feat for centarn inc lutling up ro 15 percent reataucante. He asked if they had considered applying a seperace ratio far all restaurant aces. Mr. Spagno le replied that soma cities studied use a bees rate and require atld itional perking Eor reetautante while otnere use a Daee rata including res 4urant• with no restrict icn• on the amount of •paca devoted to rasteurant assn. Ha noted that the proposed race would require 30 apace^ for each 1,000 aquas feet of restaurant use when she usage exceeds 15 percent. Chairman McNtal commented that with the current forma la, problems can occur Decease the tenant mix is unknown at the Cime the build inge ere constructed. Mt. Coleman stated etetf wee trying to find a requirement Chet makes sense in terms of enginearing analys Se. Ha said staff wanted something that would ba easy eo administer and would not requiro a developer to tletormina a refute tenant mix when laying out a shopping center. He felt the proposed changes would accomplish those goals. Cha Lrman McNiel felt that ae time gone on, smaller centers will be developed. He questioned the affect on the smeller centers. Planning Commie ion Minutee -11- January 13, 1991 ill Mr. Coleman responded thnt canters under 25,000 square Eeet would st i11 calculate individual uses ae the flat rate would only apply to eentere of over 25,000 square feet. Commissioner Valletta asked iE the City Municipal Code currently restricts the amount of restaurant apace in shopping centers. Nr. Coleman responded negatively. Chairman McNial asked if the 15 percent allocation for restaurant uses would allow euff icient parking antl sufficient restaurant apace. Nr. Coleman fa It the 15 percent would be a reasonable allocation. Commissioner Ma lc her asked if [he adoption of the regular ions would impact the number of square feet that could be developed at Victoria Gardena. Mr. Coleman reepontled that shopping centers over 1,000,000 square feet would have to provide a parking study. Commissioner Melchor asked if the adoption of the requlationa uculd likely prompt propoeala from developers tc expand leasable space in eziet ing cantata. Chairman McNiel opened the public hear inq. Rick Mager, Lewi• Homeer 1156 North Mountain Avanuar Upland, •t ac od they would net he asking for additional density at Terre Vista Town Conbr. He said they era currant ly cone idering proposing a reduction in space Prom 30,000 down to 18,000 square feet Eor the two pad huild loge at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Navan Avenue. John Pottor, Hugha• Invoetmente, Two Corparato Plaza, /250, Newport Beach, ea id they currently spend a lot of time cal culating parking demands and they wanted a useful tool. He requested approval of Ghe resolution. Chairman McNiel asked if the process uou ld work. Mr. Spagnola aCeteO he 6olieved it would. Chairman NcNial compLimentad Mr. Bpagnola on hie fine report. Hearing no furehor toot imony, Chairman McNiel closed [ho public heating. Commissioner Me lcher asked (or eLaff'a recommendation. Brad Buller, Clty Planner, thanketl the developers for [hair input. He indicated Chat staff felt the conaulcant did an excellent job end fully supported the propowd changes. Commie Loner Chlt Lea tale chat etreamllning ha^ boon needed for a long lima but it hetl been difficult to deiermina chat would work. Sh• felt the proposal would 6e a win/wLn •iiuatio n. Planning Commie sion Minutes -12- January 13, 1993 W Commie inner Valletta thanked Lewis Homes antl Hughes Znveatmenta For funding the study. She felt it was an excellent report and she favored the ehangee. Commieeionet Malcher supported the proposal. Motion= Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Vallette, to recommend iaauanee of a Negative Declaration and adopt the reeoluiion recommending approval of Development Cotle Amendment 92-01. Notion carried by the fallowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, HCNIEL, MELCHER, VALLETT6 NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE AES ENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLST09 -carried I. ANON 92-03 - ADAMS - A reque et for the Planning Cortvnieaion to der ins whether fortunetell ing ie a permitted or conditionally permitted use a the Specialty Commercial Zone of the Foothill foulevartl Specif is Plan. ontinued from November 30, 1992.) Chairman NeNiel otetl there And been a request from Che applican['• attorney to continue them ter to February 10, 1992. Brad fuller, city Ple er, stated it was up to the Commioion to determine if Commie inner Melchet suggested noti inq tM applicant [he matter would be continued with the underetanding Chet M Commission would sct tM ooze Cime the matter ie before them unloe• Chs ty Attorney offers an opinion that there ie a valid teseon for continuance. Ralph Hanson, city Attorney, said that wculd acceptable. Xe ae id he had notified Mr. Fisher, the applicant's attorney, hat the City wet concerned they wets doing 6ueines• at teat addreu and Nr. Fisher said they were not conducting bueines• mete. Commiuioner Me lcher etaGd he bed lookW in tM window on January 10, 1993, and the apace i• completely vacant. Hot loo: Moved by Nelchsr, earn ndad by Chitiea, to continue U Detarmina[lon 92-03 to Psbruary 10, 1997, wi[h a request to ttaEt that the applicant be notified the Commission would ect on Che matter at Chet time unl • the City Attorney adviud there wa^ a valid reason for further continuance. ~ . . ~ ~ LC wished to coot low • matter. Ne noted the matGt had been coneinwd uveral tima• in the pa Ne said the City attorney had nos if lad the applicant'• attorney Chat qo cause would be needed in order to continua the matter. He sold et aft did not now what a contlnuance would accompl ieh one he thought the applicant mey be loo 'ng at other options. Planning Commie ice Ninute• -13- January 13, 1993 61 t.ra a yr ava:v a.nv v~r,n:vavavvn STAFF REPORT DATE: January 13, 1993 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission F PDM: Brad Huller, Clty Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SVBJ ECT: INVIRONMENTAL ASSBS5MENT AND DEV EUJPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 92-01 - CZTY OF RANCHO CVCAMCNGA - A request to amend title 17, Chapter 17.12 0£ the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regarding parking requirements with!n shopping centers. ABSTRACT: The report presents amendments to the Development Code shopping center parking requirements for discussion in a public workshop. BACKGROUND: In 1991, the City amended it's parking regulations to require "one-size-fits-all" parking spaces. Tao of the developera who participated in the amendment process also suggested changes to the way the City calculates parking requirements for shopping centers. Hughes Investments and Lewis Nomes Management Corporation offered to fund an independent study by a transportation engineer. The Planning Commission directed staff to add the Item to the Planning Division Work Program. The City contracted with P 6 D Technologies to prepare the report (distributed August 26, 1992, under separate cover). ANALYSIS: The Shopping Center Pazking Requirements Study supports the developera' request to modify the existing ordinances. A summary of the report's findings and recommendations is found on page i of the document. Currently, the City's ordinance require8 that parking for individual uses be calculated individually f1.e., retail, restaurant, office, beauty salon, etc.). Retail use required 4 apneas per 1,000 square Eeet and greater amounts of perking are required for other types eE tenants. This cumbersome process dictates that parking requirements, and the related tenant mix, be fixed at the time of approval. This means that developera and staff must make assumptions about the tenant mix that may change in the actual leasing phase or over time as tenants turn-over. In order to simplify the process of determining parking requirements for shopping centers, the resort recommends eseentia lly thaC a flat rate of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feat be established For all but the largest of shopping centers, with a carts in percentage of restaurant and office uses allowed. Deyond these percentages, the [sport recommends that additional parking be required for those individual uses. T:.e apecrfir. recoimnendat Ions are outlined on pages 19-20 of the report. PLANNING COMMISSZON STAFF REPORT DCA 92-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA January 13, 1993 Page 2 EXISTING CENTERS: One issue that must 6e addressed with any Code amendment is the impact said change will have on existing or approved developments. The effect of the proposed recommendations upon seven shopping centers, ranging from small strip centers to large community shopping centers, is presented on page 21 of the report. In some cases, the proposed parking requirements would require a greater number of parking spaces for the existing uses; hence, it may affect future leasing. Because these centers were approved under a different pazking standard, staff does not believe it is reasonable to require compliance with the proposed standard. Therefore, staff proposes a parking requirement of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square Feet For existing centers. For example, the Vineyards Marketplace (Albertsons) shopping center would require 545 spaces at 4.5 spaces per 1,000 versus 607 spaces at 5 spaces per 1,000. The master plan for this shopping center wi 11 proyi de 520 parking spaces; hence, the difference would be 25 spaces (545 - 520 = 25) under the 4.5 spaces per 1,000 standard. A detailed analysis prepared by the City's consultant is contained in ExhibiC "C.^ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed Parts I and II of the Initial Study and did not identify any adverse environmental impacts which could result Erom this amendment. Therefore, the issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission conduct a workshop review of the report and tecoamendationa, and take piblic testimony. If the Commission can support the proposed changes, t;.en adoption of the attached Resolution recommending approval Lo the City Council would be in order. Res lly g ¢tted, Brad ler Cit Planner BB:DC:mlq Attachments: Exhibit "A" - May 15, 1991, Memorandum Erom Developers Exhibit "B" - Parking Study Exhibit "C" - Addendum to Parking Study Exhibit "D" - Letter from Hughes Inveetmen is Resolution Recommending Approval of Development Code Amendment 92-07 City Council Ordinance for Development Code Amendment 92-01 W MEMORANDUM TO: Rancho Cucamonga Plaeniog Staff ,S~~j~ FROM: Hughn Ittvestmenb j-~ . pi Lewis Homes Management Corp, fGW DATE: May 15, 1991 ~~p' ~ I ~J~i V RE Purposed Perking thdinaace Revision ~ lJ City of Rancho Cucamonga Per yon request, we have aoalyaed the City of Rancho Cucamonga's proposal m eliminate mmpsct parking spscnv from iu ordinanx and the isstrGS and impacts regarding that pmpoaaL We have alto revicaed the City's current Parting Provisan requirements and offer. as m alrornaWq a proposal tu address that m weLL A. Iatll~ Use, or etiminatlon ot: present compact car parking (8' x 16' stall sise). - Pa the Urban Irnd Imtitute, the institute o[ Tramportation Engineers, the National Parting AocciatiotVComulrsnt'a CatmcB, 1T30 Fotutdation for Tramportapoq and International Coungl of Shopping Centers, the folowing informations evarLbk regarding oompaa Pv~ ya~,~ • Apprmimately 80% a[ cars currently in me arc S- 9' wide : IS•7• bng QL(~ Thins the defined small to middy car. • Apprmimately 21196 of a8 ptrs are comidered 'large an'. 1lf4!! of which (83% of this nugory) arc oo kerger than ti'-1' wide by IT•r tin6- ' Parting space widW re9tsircmens arc genera8y determined by adding 21' test losg term, Into turnover parting ester m 28' [or high turnover parting; 2A" 6 moat commonly teed, Parking span: kogth tegttiremeos are typica8y determined hY adding S to 9' to the kagth of the vehicle 9' it moat commonly mad • Thesdat Appttsimately 9796 (Le. 80% + (20%x85%)) of a8 cart in tse are tlo toga than ti'-1• x 17t 2"taulting kn: • • Apprmdmateky 8096 of cars treading spaea r. Y wide x 1V- 4' bng. • • Apptadmatey 1796 of cats needing ,paps /_ 1• ~,;de : lT• il' koog. NOTE For [rather backyunnd regarding the above information, nee F.xhtbin MD asd Attachments 3,4,3 and 8 (attaehed herew). The following F~thtbis A-D, (found oho in Attachment 4), clearly support this eonelusion and serve t0 illmtrste the growing promkoence o[ sma8 can in the United Slates: Small a. ! .....~.ee) Pah+nr Rancho Cucamonga a+rteatly allows 8'x 16' compact apaw m ~ perceatase of total project parking The larger size compaU apace wually antidpate some misuse o[ throe spew and therefore, Can havdle ocaskonal large urs. The mat common probems rcgardvtg the use of compam parking, experienced kn Reecho Cucamonga, involve poorly located or identified spew and eofotoement Sohtiom m thee problems [or emtkog projects, lie in wetlived parking bt desisq paphio, and enforcement of appropriate CCRR and tenant lease rcguhemeata In commercial project, espedatly rctap where customer mnveoieatzr pr®aq, compact parking spew should be located in areal where parkins "s leas (rCquently used. These areas would priman7y fie: • • Spew firthet away From butldins entranw • • I.ow turnover parkins yeas such m those utilized by empb)ees, indudini l~nL in rear service ateaa Use of these spew thouW be etdaccd by teams and the landbrd, throush tenant kase and the CCdR's to loxp [ull~sae spew oonvrAimtly avarLbk w customers u mucA o pawble To the evfeat eompam apaw arc located in prime areas, davetopen ahouW ahvrys provide clear identificatbo, painted pavement sraphia, and ^ tonveoieot mQ wit6 [up~oe to encourage smap wn to use three spew Ent (See 1T13 Jaumal and IILI •parkins Requiremeota for Shoppins Centea' publkatioos attached} Many ektiet, Rancho tatramoop ioduded, sn71 have a problem whh the we and enforcement of compact parkins and wish m elimkoate them. Hoaewr, asst dtie ttxxrsnia that the great aujoriry of vehicle tall into the hmap at tdraatmwtfon Many alternatives have been eapkxcd, but the most aommooly used i pre dowalae the patldog apxe requirement tar ai vehicle, teultios is a cne sine p4 aP ptrrkiog apam The mat widely reed ate i< 8 1/2• : ikt', and this da •odn wdi for pterapy d whide with troy same ameptiooa Qtly arch r Anaheim, gaaotlde, Same Ana, L.eog 19eaeh, &meNdo. ~[oatly ~ haw cep adopted this atttodard The dtle meotlened abase, ahhottgh poptdatlao than Rancho tatamanp, me appropriate to tumpmisoo PmP~. given the projected atdrstantial ptrpulation growth at Rancho Saxe mat vehide as 'smap care', the majoriq a( rpaa available rhtwld Pw,~ pester than rewmmeoded doaapeaiog dearaooes eves when wed by 9asge an' (see 13tdubit 13). Notr. For [urthe search and bactpound, see Attachment 1 thttrug6 7. Thb dovvrsizios to a Naodatd 8 1/1' : 18' apace, vrID spots for apptatdmately the acme tntmhet at parting span as a lot with ~rpompab e~ and ootapy epminate the etssem aotoroemeot ~~ l ~ tf2J .Z. ~nG1.• i h i r ~'~ _~ In our have reviewed other proposed aolutam sod altermtivcs to the e0mioation of compact perking s which include suggestam such as;Jrxpofg-ihe spaces the same width, but a shorter length, dowm' the length of stand p£w Doty, tx other oombinatiom thereof 'Ilse best alternative, and u area ' most widely used, remaies the recommendation of dowmiriog spaces to 8 12 a es. 7Lis apprwch has the added beneLt of e0minatiog any enforcement ' e olio [Del that sn the PlaOniug Cammusioq may vvnh to mmkkr a coocu reduction in the basic parking ' requirement, simdu to what was done in B. ~: ~. _ . __ _ _--~ ~ Rancho Cucamonga i curnot ordinance [or parking tequiremenn (Sae. 17.12090 &1) for commerdaUrctad and xrvia asp it extremely restrictive and wnRning. 9eyond norma0y accepted base indicn of 4.0 per 1,000 SF a 1 car per 220 SF of balding area, there is a kmg Iat of additional eves which require a provisan for additional puking. Heyond, perhaps, food uses,, ~ doemaa, public aasemby aed acme reereational urEs, these requircmenn are burdemome sod do not recogoiu the shared paddng upect of tenann within a shopping sots, where tempt peak hours quite often do not mioeide. It 6 also prexnn the devebpment team, and the 6ty, with the dlemma of not knowing how to aceuralery predict potential versus final tenant mnr in order m provide the required parldog. Background The Urban Ieod Institute and the International Counml of Shopping Ceotaa have done egtemive reaeuch and study regarding parking requiremenn Rx shopping centers, '1Lex publicatioq Raking Requvemenn [a Shopping Centers: Summary Reeommeadatiom and Research Study Report' (a copy of whichs utached hereto for your review) i the roar authorintive and widely acepted publication oo the subjeeL It anatyxes parking requicemeoa (o relation to center tQe, use, method of travel, empkryee puking, and automoMle sin, and prarnn in raommeadaliom atxordingty. IJLI Recottunendatiom Per the W Report, the [o0owingn a summary of their parking tetoommeadatkoa: Ht~ha4sf • '1.0 spaces per 1.000 SF of gtas kwbk area (t3IA) Wr aoten having a OIA of 25.000 to 100,000 SF. • Fmm 4.0 to 5.0 spaces ie a linear pregressioo, with an average of 1.3 gpaoa par 1.000 SF of GIA, [or aoters having Rom IOQ000 to 600,000 SF. • 5.0 spaees per 1,000 SF of 6U for antes having • OIa al ova 600,000 SF.• [Jse Comideratiom -'Ihe WOovvhtg adjmttoeot recommeadatbm axe propaed by IJII with the attumption that the base indicts sated shove are teed as the uodatyiog taquirementa. 'VYithin the full noge o[ lemon Wand in shopping antes, amasti efrmaa, stall food aetvics requite additional wmidaatiot- 3- Office space amounting up to 10 percent of the total GIA can be eaommodstcd without providing parting io addition to that imposed by the application of the overall parking indices. Otero space is e~ess of 30 percent of the oeats~s GIA requites addiiooY paririog, although less than a freestanding office because of the eva0ab0iry of puking for dual purpose.' Cinemas 'At centers with 100.000 to 2110,000 SF of GIA having dsmr with up b X50 sea, and at centers with over 200,000 SF of GIA having cinemas with up to 750 scab, patmm ens be aaommodated' without provision of parking spew is addition b the overtil recommended:bodard. Cinemas having anon tW thi atrba of seals, or eiae~aa located at smaller ceatra, htraeva, tequvo a tromieal three addktto®1 apwsa par 10D aeaLL_• Food Services 'For food services occupying up b 10 percent of the ads{ GIA at centers with 100,000 SF or less, or up m ] percent of the told GI.A of mstesa Naga rhea 1OQ00D SF, the differential parkdng demand h the [olbwing: • • A nester with more than 25,000 and les ehao 100,000 SF of total GIA requirm ao addilioeal 10 spans per 1.000 SF o[ food service tenant area • • A center 6aviog 100,000 but Ica than 20D,000 SF of total GI.A requires as additional 60 spew per 1,000 SF o[ food service tenant area. • • A tearer having 20(1,000 but ka rhea 600.000 SF o[ total GI.A require m additional spaces for food services • • A center with 600,000 SF ar more of GIA coo reduce the required Parting (a calculated by using the recommended lode: of 5.0 spaces pe 1,000 SF of GU) by 4.0 spew per 1.000 SF o[ GU drwtod b food service'. Ikatad upon the IJfJ ask: sad prtisg ngttiaaas4 trsstd b! sassy oche cit(ea. ttaS and the Commission my. adsY b cnsaidac th. sand ter additonal lei O°lf ~ Nnsid W for aioem. assn, food tea (ka scree dttstle~l snit arhr public asassttWy twos. attd tsrseadopal faa7ities II would be outmr~asaiasbe thal, satweteetky wills adds~Y f thn mmpet pt itaue. tAe C7ry tr:vie sad sidlWP aMi peif~ n7°~~ ~ ~°PP~i w.las to pails. h.r iode of SA cart per 1,000' SP"o[ (f},{ far_ cep die. ' lslYaanoasy thi ~toriina shard/ star tip b 13% tearawraat (foal asses with saWy fialitias) wGbW inquiring aq additiesal partly for saran np b 2DD,OOD SF sad tip b 1091 (ar eaalaU bdsraen 200.,008 .%+ tad 6001800 SRr Pot anlea over 60D,000 SF, the 1J11 rooommeodatioos for Parking should be applied Cas0 stadia tslsg the ~Ya~ MartetPkae4 ViUaria Cactyar4 Tern Vbb Taws Caster, sad CenW Put Plaza Shopping Center in Rancho Qtdnooop era attached These studio alculate the potesdai restatuast .teas which would be a0owed using . sn000 base parting htdar. Par mmpar6an PuTee• ~ P~ai 1e9~ Pa Rancho Cutamooga'a curtest parting ardisasee, without comiderttion of rise, i oho shown. /- Case Stadia 1. Ymryatds Marketplace ShoPP~g ~~ Budding Atea 121,401 SF Pssling (@ 5/1000) 507 Can Parking (@ 4/1Q'Yl)• ~ Ditferc°a +121 Can Add Ranuraata: B1JII.DING PARRII4G RAT1O PARKING ~ ARFA REOUIRFD• g$GinR Commucid 105,001 SF 4/1000 420 Can Fsst Food Rataunma 6,900 SF 1/75 92 Sit Down Ranuranb 9300 SF 1/100 ~ Total 121,401 SF ~ CoR BY Pig 14400 SF of restaruant uaa (with aeatlog 1ac0itia), 121 additbnal ara would he required above a bsse iodrz prwuion of 4/1000. If Percennae Ratauraetc S/1000 pn were provided, the project would mmply. 16,40D SFl121,401 SF >• 13LSA Ytctoria Courtyard: 31 Puking (Q 3/1000) 1,375 Can Parking (® 1/120)' l.~ ~~~ AdsLBgtgkimiC +143 Can BU<1D7NG PARING RATIO PAR1~1G' ~+ OBEd REQUIRED• ~~~ tbmmerei.l 29],373 SF 1/120 SF 1,329 Can Fast Food Reatauranb 6,000 S1+ 1/13 8D Sit Down Rauunob l~$t 1/l00 ~_ Total 314yT3 SF 1,373 Can • Pu cutreat Ctty OnBnanw . 3 . 2 se~ate9u By providio~ 22,600 SF of reaburanta, 143 sdditiooal can would be required above a brae ratio of 1/120. I[ S/1000 tan was ptovidad, the project would mmply. Perceotaae Restaunob: 72,600 SFfl14,975 SF = 711 Sys Studies 3. CeaW Park Plea Shoppio~ Center. Puldoj (® 000) 112,365 Can Parluo~ (~ 4/10110)• 4~ Di[fereme +113 Can AQd Resbuneb: BUIi.DIN6 PARKINU RATIO PARKING ~ ABEd RF.OUIRID• g Commercial 95,996 SF 1/1000 384 Can Fart Food Ratautaab 3,400 SF ~ 43 Sit Dorm Rabunab ]7~9(1~ 1ry00 3~ ToW Saa9llaicrt (12,996 SF ~ Cara 19y provWiaj 17,000 SF of resburaab tarn (wdW aeatio8 ficWtln~ I13 adddtlooal cua would 6e roquired abae a brae index proviaba of M1000. u 5/1000 tart was prov(deQ the project would complP. Paccar ae Rat•~..~b: nano sFnlz99s sF - °';~M 4. Tam Vbb Tam Cmbr. SIl 2,889 An Partloi ( ~pj• Z~ fNHeteme +2~ Can -6- ~ Rauuraota: HUIIDING PARI@fG RATiO PARKRVG ~ ABEA REGinRID• g~Z{I)Bgp Cootmenid 535,359 SF 1/Y20 SF 2,433 Can Fast Food Resuuranb 9,000 SF 1//S 120 Sit Down Resuuranb 33.600 SF 1/100 ~ 7otel 5T1,859 SF 2,884 Can • Pu ourreat City OrdmauQ Sew By pravidio6 42,600 SF of rouurauu, 262 additioal eua would be required above a box ratio of 1/220. R S/1000 an were provideQ the project would nomply. 42,600 SF/SI7,859 SF ~ 7.11 Slone the rsre riudia above ptopae a base ioda d S/1000 (fa the purpwe a[ iodudio~ rdtauneb), and the ULI rooommendatiom atlav [or t®tLr tewraet perxouja udo< a smatter base lode: tetptirement then the a0ow~abb routuaet noted above muW be adjurtad ati~ty him r tedkatad ie the proposal ae Pale 4. c we «commead that the sty of Rancho Glueamoop dire tertou comidtaatioe m teviao~ the aurent partio~ ardidocu io aorordanoe with the tra paopataY eootaioed hereto: 1. l:reatioo of ao 81/Y : 1tC wndard parkio~ ataB site io 0ea o[ the adsthq stun rta0 rises. 2 Simpli6catioe at the eaitioj partdoj requiremeou brad oo individual uar. m a hue rash of 5 spivs per 1,000 SF with txataio addltioeat atlowaoor Got rapatbamt, r prevbrly oullioed. we believe thN thre ptopntalt vri0 radically atmp0fy tha etrtrmt aoFetcemeel problems wtthie tbo Qty o[ R.eeho ar+maop, and brines the tre.tmem d the prtoio~ ttmrr ro goe wNh ptorm, eBeetlve, and welldoatmaated talutbes m there ptabkmt. ~- 70 The toundatlon upon whbh tlils disarasbn Ot ~~ peo metrics is 6asad is the de8nidon of a smell car b comparison to ttw standard or lar0e car. For purposes of This sport, and t0 atabYsh a uniform and really adaptable temdnob0y, ae automo- tlUN and 8GM trtrcka wi8 ba grouped into two dwaa - mraaand b-9a• This DaMC narrendalun is intended Zo ~+Deh ffis P'~ss of whkie dwi6ceNen and sutue- quent parMnO fadiif' deaipn. Extansira conaldara8on has been piwn b the won of automobOss and RpM tnrdts aooordin0 to tlNkfootprlnt • RN OrOUnd arse covered by ea~hlatdcla bwdon Iargthllmaswidthaxprassedintamaofaquan kat (S~ or spoon mates (SAQ. TM system taada 10 assipnrttantofvehidgl0 oneafsawn Waaea,batadalr ON vatida ana N manta Because Ota smdlert can mwran arworno ksstttan 6mataa,lM smaMrtdaa isaw6. LBteMrta,thalarpastvaMdnantnGwll. sMAUCans Coat 6 -6.0010 6.98 9M 63.!210 64.67 SF Ga» 6 - 6.00 to 6,9D 8M 61.68 a 75.34 9F aw 7 - 7.00 t0 7.88 SM 76.35 to 68.10 t!F tARYiE CARS aw a - 6.00 m 3.siY SM 68.11 to sl6.7e 9R aw • - ooo m 6AD 8M 86.n to 107.68 aR awto-laao toto.~sM 11n.54fo1.1f~9F awn -11.ao to 11.9P BM 116.40 to 12@.06 ~ ._ 8M.8gwnMeten 9R. $quw Fiat cd hoar N Qai~ for aamrr ~ lael~iaa G°erttlcf' ~a/wt, welt eatioo~~,, 1!askiae YaoeLtloa/'/1 One soyroe hu chatM. .aa ~W a av sidoe to oath slender year etrx:e 1970, Dried on a boundary oft4'•11•xS-9'betrwonarruiandlaipaearsm Sma6 pr salmi bounced around In a rarys between 14'1L and 1S7G hom 1973 to 1978,>ashown inFipureEAeteady rlso in ~w car sales otxurred througA 1991 ~ a4biSxlrg then, with an averege of 52%sma8 prs so>d Nrh year from 1983 thN 1988. Uainp data from Fi.L Potk Com• parry on vehicle raptatrwons, Ors same rerorerxe ad• mates that u% of the wafrda en the road as of January 1,1889 are 14'-1 t• x S-9' W smaM-. PfestJm- hro that the pa,eo,nape of saw care sob each year remains yeneraey atabh, tho percernape of smw Cars on the road wig contbare m trxssase at an sstlmated rate o} about 2% peryeu. AntnltU Automt~blla Sales tsn ens as vM +i ~• i~ :o. J ar* an- re^ roe ..~....,.....~r,»~~...~.w^~~...A...~. CaMnmr rier • w+rr.....~w,nraaq rrrr Fiptu~ H eta.rye.4 ftou "^Kioi~i erfd~llnu for l~teiea O~ortzfea", WWet• 1eNi Actooal ®IEI! ^ ~•t~e YraoeLtion/l~rkinf Coa~ulcanu Cawcii ++a--l-l--F-t-+-I-1- - -F-a- 1 I-1 1 1 1 1 I- -I 1 1 1 t-t-r-1-rY-rr-1 r-r-rr-rr•-1-rt ttt-1-l~-ttt -i--fit-1-t-~1-tr---~{{-F~-t 1J-1J-i.1 J-L1~1J-L1-L1 T I 1 ZTT;-rT-I-T;-r (-~'T + -F-+-I-+~-~-~-F-+-i-1--F-F-+ °~ eael~ pauonpx t< rtrodsl as roponed try Automo8ve News sine 1980 have been tabutadad by the daeses prevtoully debned (Rpure ~. Class 10 and Clans 11 vshidee, winch an penera9y over iT~' In length and 8'-8' inwidlh, have decfiaod from ae much ae 14%of annual saleain 1982, to T!G otttw markettn 1988. FIGURE F K has aMo been reported that ttttwrai ,Mango 8rat~ti Horwv~ar, the ProPo~ ~ cars wW etll be No dwt 8' x 1T. vArioh would pha 1t-wn in Coo A Otlrors haw rgUd tlra maeWd inraasp M Ip1N truck, van, and utl1~r whlda oAs, artd iM b up of tiroaa veNeNs In evarydyr panontl irilttp9R Tbeq whklos Irava not bean Indudad in the Pas- sergerCar8tudy(Fipura ~ tre.cpnl lrau d Ouldoliw~ for hrkfea C~owtrle~"~ ~ooN~t ®rIDIi ~ I!e!i Ibt1o~1 hrklo!'A~~oc hrkloe Coo~oltoou Cassell ikiesal- .he851hpertan- tA 7 has ttan stable sins 'die 85th petten6k amo Jvt ~adlned 1 .2' x S-5' iT-2' x S•i• (Fipu-a i~. y~ s data does not Indu modol hides, h is reasotwbiy condatsnt vawt provlout stadia. The previousy rsfsrerrrsd ttttadr ~+ which ttad while ra0istndonsnadonwtdsucfJanuery t, t983, fcundths 85th porterKile whidato!» 14'-8' X5'-T iorsmdltan and 18'-d' x 8'-T for Isrps tats. The deslpn vettkNa for the natlttral mix d t-uto- rnob8os on tha road a at January t, 7989. have bean eonserva0vety t»ttimatad to N a fo8owa: Srtu9 Cars i~'-8'x6'-8' Wpe Con 79'-0' x 6'-8' K ie irderestlrq to note dna. durtnp this period (1983.1988). the dssipn valAda for txnlll oan has rs- rru-insd Whe tIMbN, buttlaldta ttaipn valtida fot large taus has dsdlned, sepsda8y M NmplA. Oa&ON t+6i1C4l9 9Y Ct-L819AR 1f9A11 ~~ .~rartw.....n tas.orps•tt1 w t.tiu etw w. t.~ea w~ w. nae to v w na u nas an w v w n~ u ++u nae w u w to u tw aM us v tv tsa u tw au w u w ns u nt.t +ttr xt u w n: a tots aee to u w ns u toss te0 tL7 ar at.f M w +er to u w tXt a tau • tr~~rwrasl~~rnsrwra.rw Flau~ x •acod.~ Data Ito: earl: 0 19ai esogi hcktea Vwe/ [uklaa Co~mlcauu Coupp,}1 H m~ // II 1 F ~t R x t~ E%FMBIT E C-1Rf~~,~ 7J ~ 8 Varked Vehicles 20th Highest Hour w ~ a C ~ N fp °' E om ~, v ° G ~ G dY 1/i ~ ~ l0 .Oa °c E o° C Y a° ^~ g I • 1 y I• i I ~ I 8 y ~ a ~ . ~ ~ 7i ~. Y . • I 8 N Y I ~ ~ ~ $ ~~ . ~ r ~ I ^ QQ i • ,• I • • I i^ 1 .~ 1 . s i . ~ • I . ~ • . • ^i . ~ i ~ • I i .. • • $ ( ' f i I i i I I ~ • 1 ' ~ • ~ I • 1 I a ~ 1 1 1 8 ~ I I f I I 1 1 )~ a E L A 3 ~ P O w O N t Oj N ~ N e := e ~ • n e P t e~ i ~E ~¢ ^ .z s N N M1 h 6reerytad Eras il~EeEr r "r.rklt~ R.y„tr...nc^ Eor 4eu~~nd~tloo~ei 4 .~t reh Studr Report. OLIN $.cond P[LnE1a6~ 1982 76 Number of Parking Spaces Required m C d v rn c n a 0 r N ~ y d~ ~ V ca v c dEe ~ ~ Y V r ~ N t0 ~¢a n 8 F 3 a `a=~ i • i . ~ i J O ~ O I a ~tt~zp[M (rVA] 13HIEI2 C P~~t tpairsenu for 14oPPiai Gnt~n: Su~r7 ~cornd~tion~ i Bese~rc6 Srw1f B~port, OLIN Secood Prlnc Sng, I9H: 11 v m e ,; rv BIBLIOGRAPHY Attac6meat 1 Box, P.C, Iteeig, NS. 'Parkins Layout Dimension Guidelines' Institute of Transpaution Engineers Journal, April 1984 2 Gty at Amhdm Pirmnmg Deparmreat Plamiog Commioion Meetloi hTmute of September 2S, 1989 3 Iteaeipp, L M. 'Puldoi Demand' Keadpp, J. kf. 'Desisn 6x Small Cass' Parkins Comultaou CouocB, Natbaal Parkns Atsoeiation '13e Dimemioe of Parkins', Snood Edition washinstoe: Urban Land Jmdture and Nadond Parkins Auociatloq 19B! ~ 'Reoommcadcd Guideline tot Putins Geamenio', Auset 1989 National Parkins Asaociation/Parkins Comultaon Counm pattlo{ Space Standards Committee 3 'ShoPpini Center Pukins: The Lr9irooe o[ Chwslns Car Sme' CbyKer 3, 'Gt Sine and Parkins StaO/A61e G~ Intematioosl Counal at Sboppias Ceatps, 198{ b Techoinl Couoeil Cammittx 3D$ uutitute af'l~aeportatioa Eaiimmt 'Guideline far Parkins Faculty Lawtioo and Destsa', Ma} 1990 7 weam, R.A.: gun in0uent~ at Smauu Can m parldni T}tePostaflia Quarterly, Vd 39, No. 3, Jttip 1985 8 Urbae Land Lutlnrte, Rarldns Requtrr~eats dtr Suoppios Cmeerx Summery Remmmeadatlom and Reaearcu Stuq Report. washioswx Urbrm Ltmd eta Seuood Printtas, 1982 78 e SHOPPING CENTER PARKING REQUIl2El1~IIIV'1'S STUDY Prepared jor. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civk Cwter Drive Rancho Cucamon=a, CA 91729 Proposed by: P&D TECHNOLOGIFS 650 East Hospitality Lane Suite 350 Saa Bernardino CA 924118 ,~ ~ ust~ ,`~ f m A 9 ~ t pS r JULY 1992 F c^``ac rp _- 79 a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHOPPING CENTER PARKING STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS $CGh0+1 PAYC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................ t 1.0 INTRODUC170N .............................................. 1 2.0 REVIEW OF EXISTING C11Y ORDINANCE ......................... 2 3.0 SURVEY OF OTHER CITIES ..................................... 3 4.0 REVIEW OF SELECTED EXISTING CENTERS ....................... 4 5.0 EVALUATION OF URBAN LAND INSTITUTE PARKING STUDY ......... 7 6.0 PARKING SURVEY ........................................... 10 7.0 CASE STUDY ................................................ 11 8.0 L'SES GIVEN SPECIAL CONSIDERATION ......................... 12 9.0 DESIGN DEMAND ....................................... . ... IS 10.0 CONCLUSIONS .............................................. 17 1L0 RECOMMENDED REVISION TO THE CITY PARKING ORDINANCE .... 18 12.0 EFFECT ON EXISTING CENTERS ............................... 21 e LIST OF TABLES ~ 1'HP~ 1. LIST OF CITIES TO BE SURVEYED ..................... .... 3 2. SURVEY QUESTIONS ................................ .... 3 3. SUMMARY MATRIX OF SURVEY RESPONSES ........... ... 3 4. DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY AT SURVEY SITES .......... ... 11 5. PARKING SURVEY RESULTS .......................... ... 11 6. PARKING CHARACTERISTICS AT CHII.I'S RESTAURANT .. ... 12 7. PARKING CHARACTERISTICS AT COCO'S/SALSTTAS RESTAURANT ...................................... ... 13 S. EFFECT OF COMBINED RESTAURANT AND CINEMA PEAK PARKING .......................................... ... 15 9. COMPARISON OF THE PARKING SUPPLY AT EXISTING CENTER TO THE PROPOSED REOUIItEMENT ........... ... 21 Fietve L[ST OF FIGURES PAYL 1. TOWN CENTER SITE LAYOUT AND PARKING ZONES ....... 10 2. TERRA VISTA VILLAGE LAYOUT AND PARKING ZONES .... 10 3. TOWN CENTER PARKING ACCUMULATION ................ 11 4. TERRA VISTA VILLAGE PARKING ACCUMULATION ........ 11 5. CHII.TS PARKING ACCUMULATION ...................... . 12 6. COCO'S/SALSTTAS PARKING ACCUMULATION ............. 13 7. RESTAURANT PARKING COMPONENT OF TOTAL PARKING .. 13 8. EFFECT OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE ON TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER ........................................ 21 9. EFFECT OF PROPOSED ORDINANCE ON TERRA VISTA VILLAGE .............................................. 21 81 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The CiTy of Rancho Cucamonga has experienced extensive growth in recent years. As a part of that growth, retail commercial centers have increased in the City. One azpect of the planuing process for those centers, parking requuements, haz come into question. The Cft}~s current ordinance requires that pazking equal to the sum of the parking requirements of individual land uses in the center be provided. This figure is difficult far staff to obtain az the parking requirement must be fixed in the planning process, bu[ rnters are typically not fully leased until the construction stage. Developers typically must make assumptions about their tenant mix in order for the staff to determine the parking requirement. If that tenant mix is not obtainable in the leasing process, the developer inter find uses with similar or lower parking requirements to fill the space or provide more parking on site. As a result, staff might be requued to recaladate parking requirements several times for the same site using different tenant mixes. In order [o simplify the process of determining parking requirements for shopping centers several developers proposed adoption of the IJrban Land Institute (IJLI) "p~~g ?;ggttirementc for Shonp~g nt rs", The Ciry retained the service of P&D Technologies to determine the suitability of Were requirements for the t,1ty of Rancho Cucamonga P&D Technologies utilized a three part approached to this study: first survey other agencies in We azea to determine their shopping center requirements; second, make a detailed analysis of the ULI recommendations; and, finally, perform an in depW survey of two sites in We city to compare existing parking chazacterisda wiW We existing ordinance and proposed requirements. The survey of other agencies reflected a wide rattge of approaches from summing individual land uses similar to We current ordinance, to one city Wa[ adopted an ordinance very similar to what was proposed for Rancho Cucamonga Aa in depW review of We L1Id study revealed an impressive amount of survey data. The case studies done by IJId tended to be located east of the Mississippi River (11 out of 15), however, a good portion of We questionnaires were done is California The study is somewhat dated, but We data still appear to have validity. A detailed license plate survey was conducted at We Terra Vista Town Centor and Terra Vista Village. BoW Wosc surveys found parking characteristic similar to Wat identified in We ULi, htrWer correlating Wat study to We Ciry. Additional analysis of We survey data revealed information about restaurant and cinema use which was rnnsidered in We rewmmendadon. Finally, an analysis of We peak parking detaand was made using an aerial photo taken during the peak Chnsttnas shopping season and related to a design day. Based on We study effort, a recommendation is made that: for shopping «nters less than 25,000 square feet pazliag be requued based on individual uses; and for centers from 25,000 to 600,000 square feet, parking be required at 5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross leasable area; and for centers from 600,000 to 1,000,000 square feet parking be required at SS spaces per 1000 square feet of gross leasable arses The parking requirement will include food service uses up to 15% of We gross leasable azea, but some additional parking for cinemas of certain siu in mmbinadon wiW certain stud centers, will be required. The sWdy concludes wiW a review of We effect of the proposed ordinantt oa existing centers. 1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of Rancho Cucamonga has experienced extensive growth in recent years. With that growth has come a lazge demand for retail commercial services, which is being answered by a number of shopping center developments currently underway or planned in the City. Processing of these developments has brought to light difficulties is implementing the City's exis[irtg pazking ordinance as it relates to shopping centers. From the t'ity staff s perspective, the main difficulty with the current ordinance is having to obtain the type of use proposed for every space in a proposed center, then calculating individual and toml parking requirements. If a lessee changes during the process, the pazking requirement must be recalculated. The development rnmmunity is rnastrained by the ordinance because they generally do not know the speafic ux that might lease a particular space. They must either provide pazking for the most intense use or choose a particular use, then limit thew mazketing to thou category of businesses. This can result in a limited tenant mi + plus, while spaces are unleased, loss of City sales tax revenue. In response to this situation, members of the region's development rnmmunity have proposed a modification to the City's ordinance based on recommendations made in the Urban Land Institute (UI.n "Pazking Requirements for Shopping Centers". The purpox of this parking study is to analyze the City's parking requirement and the propoxd modification and recommend changes, if any, to the pazkitrg ordinance for shopping centers. The approach uxd in this study entaiLt three steps: first, survey other agendes in the area to determine their shopping cenur pazldng requirements; second, evaluate the applicability of the UI.I rewmmendanotu to the City of Rancho Cucamonga through a detailed analysis of the report; and finally, perform a license plate parking survey at Terra Vista Town Center to compaze actual pazking charaderistia at a ]mown siu to the existing ordinance, propoxd ordinance and other typical parking requirements. ._... .. -- -.. .. _..__.. _ .._ _._.~,_..-_~..A e 2.0 REVIEW OF THE EXISTING CITY PARKING ORDINANCE The City's current parking orditance was adopted in 1984 and has only been modified slightly since then. The code was derived from two sources; a tetephone survey of odter cities and the pre-e~dsting Cotmty of San 13ernazdino pazldng ordinance. Those elemenu thought best out of each of the sources were combined into the current City parking ordittanct. No parking studies were performed. The Cit}~s existing parking code is provided in Appendix A. As can be seeA numerous exceptions exist to the general base rate for mmmertial developmenu. These exceptions create great difficulty for the City Planning Staff in determining how much parking a shopping center must provide. A developer does not always ]mow what type of use will occupy leasable area. As a result, the developer often provides less parking than required for the more intense uses, settittg the stage for disagreements over allowable uses. Conversely, if a particular use is andcipated in a space, and parking is provided at the rate of that use, but Ute least is not signed, certain other uses are prohibited due to lack of parking. Not only does this limit the shopping center developer, but gives City staff the additional tack of dctermining parking adequary for each use before issuing oavpanry permits. In summary, the extstuig code is difficult to implement and administer, and at times is a rnostraint to leasing. 3.0 SURVEY OF LOCAL AGENCIES It has been about eight years since the City did a survey of other cities to assist in determining its pazking requirements. As the first step is accomplishing the current pazking requirement review, a telephone survey of 13 cities in the Southern California region was undertaken. These cities were ebosen due to their similarity to Rancho Cucamonga in terms of siu and growth patterns. Four of the cities are in San Betvardino County, three each in Orange and San Diego Counties and two each in Riverside and Los Angeles Couaties. The survey was rnnducted over several days in the first week of Febmary 1992 Table I lists the cities survryed and some population and sales data about each. The response of the cities surveyed was quite mixed. Some provided for one base rate for all shopping centers regardless of size, others had rates for different sized centers. One city used no base rate and several others used a general retail rate for all but certain high intensity uses. The majority of [he dries surveyed, about 93%, requited additional parking for restaurants and other spedal uses, such as fast food, dnettta and office. Of all the Cities stuvryed, Cazlsbad was the only one that requued no additional pazking for these spedal uses. The range of base rates among the dries surveyed was from a low of 3.3/1000 [o SS/1000 SF as a high. The City of Corona was not iadude in this range because subjective judgements would have been required regarding the percent of aisle and tutving space provided. Table 2 lisu the survey questions while Table 3 is a matrix c +~m,,,an, of the survey responses. TABLE 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHOPPING CENTER PARKING REQUIREMENTS STUDY LISTING OF CITIES TO BE SURVEYED CITY COUNTY POPULATION ANNUAL SALES PER CAPITA [l1 [2] SALES RANCHO SAN BERN. 115,000 5476,610,000 54,144 CUCAMONGA CARLSBAD SANDIEGO 63500 5849,284,000 513,375 ESCONDIDO SANDIEGO 104,200 51,573,058,000 514,617 VISTA SANDIEGO 67,800 5327,832,000 54,835 WEST COVINA LOS ANGELES 94,500 5754,143,000 S7,980 SANTA CLARTTA LOS ANGELES 121,200 5961,257,000 57,931 II2VINE ORANGE 102,400 51,948,010,000 519,024 ORANGE ORANGE 107,700 5109,967,800 51,021 LAGUNA NIGL ORANGE 47,700 N/A [3j N/A(3] CORONA RIVERSIDE 70,000 5792,820,000 511,326 MORENO VAL RIVERSIDE 114,900 5406,550,000 53,538 ONTARIO SAN BERN. 129,300 S1,264,753,000 S9,782 CHINO SAN BERN. 59,600 5503,324,000 58,445 RIALTO SAN BERN. 70,300 S327,157,000 $4,654 NOTES: [i] POPULATION FOR CITIES FROM STATE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, MAY 1,1990 [2] ANNUAL RETAIL SALES FROM 'TAXABLE SALES IN CALIFORNIA", STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1990 [3] NOT AVAILABLE N. F W < Q (7 - Z ~ o a ~ w a a V ~ ~ i U U Y O Q W S 4 -~ U 6 m 2 Q a < w H ~ F Y o w U $ Y i~ t 2 ,~ F I ~~ $ ~ ~ ~ x a ~ s ~ s ~ g ~ 3 Y S ~ 8 ~ ~ o e a ~ q ~, Y ~ 9 a ~ g A e Eg ~ p ~ y ; ~ 4 ~ Y 8 ' w ~ S O s r , ~ >~ ,~ F ~4 =~ € ° ~~~ I is g ° Y ' a £ i a a~ 4 F I ~ s I$ - ~ & £ i 3 $ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ e ~ ~ ~ 3 IC Y e I;~ Y ~ Y § ~° ~ 9 a s € i ~ a ~ g a'~ a I, l~ 6 ' ¢ ~e ~ I ~ 3 ~ ~ # a ~ & ~ ~ ? ~a ~~ ~ ~ 5 8 p ~$ y 5 R~ #e~3 E g} e ~ 0 i EEE yy j~ p yp 8~ 3 5 j 66 55 ~ $~ a ~ S ~~ a yfi ~' ~ 5 j~ 5 ~ a b$ d' £ S r ~ $ ~ E € s s >a ~ '288 s >~g ~ s$ =~8 ' ~ s i~3 ' 4 S ~ i ~ ~ a q { a E >3 8 s i~i ~ s ' i~i ~ ~ a g ; i~ t ~~ ~ i Y i i i > ~i~ ra i i ~~ L s P 3 £ ~' ~ ~ p{ LL 9 6 4 ~ % gg E Y ~ ~ p'_ a ~ ~ ~ 9= }' E pp 9 yay ya 3P ff 6 n i gYYYY ~ E ~ I ~ $ 3 = a I 4 $~ i$ ~~ ~ 6' P~ e~ 5~~ 33 ~~ F i 3 Y a iY ~g- _ ~~ ~A~ ~ii E g YC~ ~ 3 r ~Y e~ Y$ s :a !~ ifi~ ~a s F ~ d pp a $ ~ $ 3 $ Y ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ # e{ t j6 g ~ Y ~ R Y R E d L a a $ i 4 ` 9 i € ~ ~t ~ ~ be ~ £ P '& ~°x } + b p t ~ ; d P E i~ f ~ y y ee i pg € `F s r~ i~ a j ~ 3 i 8 Y I~ A 3 3~ ~ _ $ x pp ~ 3 3 i p ~ ~ e a v a ~ 3 n $ ~ i a ~ ~ ~~ v ~j ~ 3 ~pq i g i ~ ~ yy it ~ ~ ~ ft ~ 9 s$ ~ @ lji Y "N a ~ ~ 9 8 ~ Y > ~ ~ ~ a I i a U Z ~ v ~ S 3 Y~ ~5 e ~ e e~ ~ e S C 3' gg d e S 87 TABLE 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHOPPING CENTER PARKING REQUIREMENTS STUDY SURVEY OF OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES PARKING CODES SL7tVEY QUESTIONS I. Wbat is the base parking rate requtred under your current parking code for shopping centers? 2. Does the parking rate vary depending oa the siu and type of shopping center? 3. Are there special parking standazds in addition to the base rate for such uses as restaurant? office? cinema? other? 4. Does your pazkiag ordinance have a provision for shazed parking? If so, how are shared pazkittg standards caicvlated? 5. When was current parking ordinance adopted? Please send to a copy. 6. Was a parking study prepared to determine parking standards? If so, please send us a copy. 7. Are you satisfied with your existing parking ordinance? 8. Are you planning to revise yotu parking ordinance in the near future? 4.0 REVIEW OF EXISTING CENTERS A review of several representative centers in the City was undertaken to establish a base line of the type commercial development occurring in the City. That baseline can then be considered when comparing the ordinances of other cities and the ULI Smdy to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Aspects of the developments [hat were of particulaz interest were the size, layout, design, and types of uses. Also, if any parking problems were evidenced. Centers reviewed for this effort were: Vineyazds Mazketplace Central Pazk Plaza Foothill Village Music Plus Center Rancho Town Center Terra Vista Village Terra Vista Town Center In general the centers were of the neighborhood size, being less than 200,000 squaze feet. The retail centers at Vineyazds Mazketplace, Central Park Plaza and Terra Vista Towa Center have not yet been completely built out They still have additional phases to come. Foothill Village and Rancho Town Center both bad a number of vacant spaces, one was especially large, a former Gemm Department store in Rancho Town Center. The centers were observed at various times during the day and ao parking problems were observed. Due to the tithing of the study, however, this review took place is March and April, it was a typically slow time for retail centers. Some operational conflicts were observed at the Music Plus Center, but they appeazed to be related to the grade differential between the street and the site, a restricted entry drive and the internal circulation system, not a shortage of pazking. Overall, that site was small and seemed cramped. Again, these observations were obviously influenced by the time of year, vacancies, incomplete projects and a generally down ernaomy. Vinev rds M rk (place • Milliken Avenue and Highland Aveme This project is located on the southeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Highland Avenue with Woodruff Place to the east and Kenyon Way to the south. Currently the development consists primarily of inline buildings with one satellite pad under coasmtction and four others available for future development. A total of 121,401 sgttaze feet Lave been approved for development Current dry code required 494 parking spaces (phu 5 for motorrydes), and 526 spaces were provided for a ratio of 433/10(10 square feet Iand adjacent to tLe site is currently vacant Uses occupving the center included an animal hospital, pet supply, dentist (future), SavOn Dmgs, Postal Annex, gift store, kitchen wazes store, dry cleaner, beauty salon, card/gifts, photo studio, Albertsons, and a nail salon. A Mobile gas station occupied a pad off tLe Milliken Avenue access and the pad under construction advertised video rentals, a comic books store, balloons and a printers. Future pads were located adjacent to the otter access drives into the site. Central Pazk Plaza Millik a d R r n a This project is located on the south east comer of Milliken Avenue and Baseline Road with Terra Vista Parkway to the south and to the east, Elleaa West The project is only partially constructed, but will ultimately contain 113,575 squaze feet of gross leasable azea Ralph's Groceries is the anchor tenant and is currently occupying the site. A total of 522 pazking spaces were provided, for a ratio of 4.60/1000 squaze feet Approximately 86,(100 square feet of building will be inline, including the Ralph's. The remaining 27,500 squaze feet will be located on five satellite pads along the west and north sides of the site. One access driveway is provided from each of the adjacent streets except for Satellite West, which has an additional access point into the rear of the inline buildings for deliveries. A bus turnout and shelter is located on Baseline Road in front of the project. Foothill Village Foothill Boulevard and H llm n Av n The project is located on the southeast comer of Foo+.hill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue extending to Helms Avenue on the east The site is served by three access points, one from Foothill Boulevard another from Hellman Avenue and the last from Helms Avenue. The site consists of 86,801 square feet of building forming an L shape along the east and south sides of the site. Pazking required was 432 spaces and 433 spaces aze provided for a pazking ratio of 4.99/1000 GLA ._ A free standing building on the west side of the site is adjacent [o the Heitman Avenue entry. A second freestanding building is adjacent to the Foothill Boulevard entry in the middle of the site on the north side. A Taco Bell is free standing at the comer of Foothill Boulevard and Helms Avenue. A number of vacancies existed at the time of the review. Uses occupying the site at dte time included: a dry cleaners, House of Fabric, clothing store, nail salon. Chuck E. Cheese, Century 21, Hallmazk, pet suppiy, shoe store, mazket/deli, rv repair, video rental. The site is located at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue. It is tite smallest site reviewed with only 28,515 squaze feet of gross leasable area and was developed under the County jurisdiction Pazking provided on site is 144 for a parking ratio of 5.0/1000 GLA The development consisted of one inline segment and one pad. Music Plus shazes the pad with a video rental, while the ialiae includes: ClothesTune, Kids Mart, Petco, Payless Shoes, nail salon, Super Cuts, cafe, and an auto parts store. This development is located just west of the Music Plus Center on Foothill Boulevard. The site is a series of inline buildings arranged in a U shape away from Foothill Boulevard. The site consists of 170,410 gross leasable squaze feet and was requtred 852 parking spaces, 830 were provided giving a parking ratio of 4.88/1000 GLrI Both this center and the Music plus center were developed under the County jurisdiction prior to Rancho Cucamonga incorporation The Planning Department was unable to definitively determine the conditions of approval. The anchor tenant had been a Gemco Department store which dosed with the rest of that chain. The builditg is currently vacant. The remaining uses include: Kragen Auto Parts, an art gallery, video rental, H&R Block, insurance, clothing stores, pet store, chiroprattor, Chinese restaurant, Standazd Brands Paint, dentist, nail saloq photos, travel agent, beauty salon, mattress store, and Nttmero Uno Pisa. A gas station is located between the two access driveways off Foothill Boutevazd. Terra Vista Villa¢e - u~~.u.,. D,,,A ~..a u.,. ......__. ~ The center is located on the northeast comer of Baseline Road and Haven Avenue with Valencia Avenue framing the site on the north and west The development coasisu of a series of shops inline along the north and west side of the site. The site totals 136,740 square fee[ of gross leasable building area Parking required was 704 spaces and 704 spaces were provided. Equivalent parking ratio is 5.1/1000 square feet The anchor tenants aze Hughes Market and Longs Drugs. The site also includes: Cloit World, Tarbell realtors, a bank, clothing stores, Mailboxes Etc., professional office suites, beauty saloq J.C. Pemry catalog outlet, and several restaurants, Noble House, Corn's, Salsitas and Burger King. This center was the site of an in-depth pazldng survey discussed later in this report Terra Vista Town Center -Foothill Bo lei rd and Haven Av n This center is located on the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. It is currently the largest shopping center iD the City with 578,341 square feet of development approved. All of the inline shops have been built, however, a number of the satellite pads are yet to be rnnstmMed. Total pazkittg requirement for the site was 3,271 spaces and 3,306 spaces were provided for a parking ratio of 5.7/1000 GIA Anchor tenants include: Tazget, Mervyn's, Montgomery Wazd, and Service Merchandise. An Edwards theater which seats 1426 is a major tenant' as is Ross. The center also includes: a food court, suites for professional offices, a finanaal mart (to be constructed) and a number of restaurants. To date only Chili's restaurant has been constructed. This center was the site of an in-depth partdng survey, dumssed later in the report. .._ 5.0 EVALUATION OF TFIE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE STUDY Because adequate pazldng is one of the most important components of a shopping center, that industry has sought out information on parking demand which could be used as standazds for parking requirements. For that purpose dre Intemadonal Council of Shopping Centers funded a study of parking demand undertaken by the Urban Land Insdmte. The report, entitled "Parkin¢ Requirements for Shoppin nt rs• a marv Recott~ ondario~ and Research S ,dv Reoort" snmmari~es the results of that study and recommends pazkiag ratios based on shopping center size and make-up. The most significant aspect of the study is the abundance of data [hat was collected. Questionnaires describing site pariing demand shazacterisda were received from 506 shopping centers. Additionally, 135 centers conducted three day parking accumulation studies. Twenty-two centers provided data for an cadre yeaz. Fifteen in-depth surveys were done at selected centers. The ULI Smdy considered the size, locador. and employment at centers, as well as the chazacteristia of the users such as: method of travel, vehicle occupancy, travel time, length of stay, and the season of the year. The primary emphasis of the Smdy was, however, the parking demand observed at the centers. Pazldng surveys for the Smdy were conducted on the Friday after Thanksgiving, and three Saturdays preceding Christmas, The holidayperiod between Thanksgiving and Christmas is considered the peak parking demand period of the year. T~Conceot of "Desi Pazking lot desigq as with highway design, is not aimed at the absolute annual peak period. Experience has shown that the cost of supplying highway, or parking lot capacity, for a peak period which tray only occur for a brief period a few time per yeaz, is not justified by the benefit. Design is typically based on some point below the absolute highest peak that will provide sufficient capacity for most simadons. This rnncept is generally referred to as the design hour, or design volume. No fixed mle exists far determining the design hour, however, either the 20th highest hour, or 85th percentile of demand is often used. The ULI Smdy utilized the 20th highest hour. Based on the information in the Smdy report, the 20th highest hour would equal respectively, 80% of the parking demand for centers larger than 400,000 squaze feet, 90%a of the demand at centers between 60,000 and 400,000 squaze feet and 95%a of demand between 25,000 and 60,000 squaze feet. The Smdy further reports that the selected design hour will result in 19 hours over 10 days, each year, in which some patrons will be unable to find parking immediately upon emering a center. The parking demand percentages discussed above were obtained by reviewing the annual parking accumulation data (22 samples) and locating the 20th highest hour of demand. The percentage of the peak demand the 20th highest hour represented was then calculated It was those percentages that were applied to the lazger sample (135) of peak (holiday) survey data. For example: if the average of the 20th highest hour parking demand volumes represented 80%a of the peak demand at centers of a particulaz size, the peak holiday demand recorded at other centers of that size range were factored by 80% and a pazking indices calculated from that demand. All of those indices were then averaged to determine the rernmmended pazking dices, by shopping center size. The recommended ULI parking indices were as follows: 4.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable azea (GLA) for centers having a GLA of 25,000 to 400,000 squaze feet; from 4.0 to 5.0 spaces in a lineaz progression, with an average of 45 spaces per 1000 GL.A, for centers having from 400,000 to 600,000 square feet; 5.0 spaces per 1000 square feet of GLA for centers having a GLA of over 600,000 square feet. Because certain uses in shopping centers affect pazking demand more than others, these uses aze given special consideration in determining parking requirements. Uses identified in this category are offices, cinemas, and food service. With respect to office uses the recommendations of the ULI Study are that 10% of the total gross leasable azea GLA can comprise office space without providing additional parking. The ULI Smdy found that peak parking demands at cinemas typically do not coincide with shopping center peak demands and therefore require only a nominal amount of additional parking based on the size of the center and theater. ULI recommendations are 3 additional parking spaces for every 100 seats for cinemas occupying up to 10%a of the GLA in centers less than 100,000 squaze feet. In centers of 100,000 to 200,000 squaze feet of GLA cinemas up to 450 seats need no additional pazking and a nominal 3 spaces pez 100 seats above 450 seats. Shopping centers over 200,000 squaze feet of GLA up to 750 seats can be accommodated without additional pazking, and for every 100 seats above 750 an additional 3.spaces are recommended. The ULI study determined that for centers more titan 25,000, but less than 100,000 up to 10% of the GLA could be food service without adding pazking, but if it exceeds 10% of the GLA teen 10 additional spaces are required for each 1000 GLA of restaurant Larger centers, however, from• 200,000 to 600,000 GLA were found to need no additional parking for food service if titose uses did mt exceed 5% of the total GLA of the center. More than 5% would require and additional 6 spaces per 1000 GLA of food service. For centers over 600,000 squaze feet, the ULd indices allow for a reduction of parking of 4.0 spaces per 1,000 GLA of food service. Aonlicability to Rancho ucamonoa Although the study sponsored by the LTL.I drew upon a tremendous amount of data, issues shouid be considered when applying the results to the City of Rancho Cucamonga issues of concern include: the report was published ten years ago, 1982, and the data utilized was probably somewhat alder. At the time of the Smdy several high parking generators, such as video rental store, health clubs and nail salons, did not exist or were not as prevalent as they are today. Mr. William Hurrell who participated in the study, stated Utat some changes in pazldng generation may have occurred. He specifically mentioned discount stores such as Price Club and Costrn and factory outlet stores. In its discussion of both office and cinema, the study specifially inctuded bout free standing and incorporated facilities. In food service, no mention was made of free standing uses. This may be a reflection of changes in design in the tea years since the study was prepared, as few of Ute in-depth case studies had any Cree standing uses. Today most all centers have a number of satellite pads for fast food or outer uses. In conversation with Mr. Harrell he indicated that the iJI.I recommendations on food service were related to those establish- menu contained in the center, and that free standing restaurants should be considered sepazate because their use is not Ued to the center. Finally, although California is well represented in the questionnaire and again is Ure three day surveys, ovly four of the 15 in-depth studies were rnnducted west of the Mississippi. Three were in California; two in the north and one in Saa Diego. Other Literature Reviewed As another method of evaluating the ULI Study other parking studies were reviewed. These included: "Shared Parldn¢" also conducted by LII.I. 'Parldnd' by the ENO Foundation and the Institute of Transportaioa Engineers "Parking Generation" 2nd Edition QO PARKING SURVEY In order to determine the effect of these iuues of the application of the ULI study to Rancho Cucamonga, a detailed pazking study was conduced. A license plate pazking survey was conducted on January 31, 1992 and February 1, 1992 at the Terra Vista Town Center and Terra Vista Village. These dates aze a Friday and Saturday, which aze typically the peak pazldng days at shopping centers. Pazldng at the centers was subdivided into zones of parking, defined by internal circulation roads (see Figures 1 and 2). Survey personnel walked through the site once each Lour. TLey recorded the first or last 3 digits of the li«nse number of each car parked. Fach space is acrnunted for on eacL circuit, if a space is empty it is left blank P&D Technologies wrote an analysis program in BASIC to analyze the survey data. The primary outputs of the program aze the hourly accumulation of parked cars, by zone, over the entire site; the hourly and overall utilization percentage of existing parking spaces, by zone, and over the entire site; the mmover rate of parked cars, the total vehicle hoots and the average duration of pazldng. Also tLe program formatted the data so that the accumulation and utilization percentages could be easily graphed. Definitions of these pazlang characteristics aze as follows: 1) Hourly Accumulation - sum of the number of occupied spa«s, by hour. 2) Percent Utilization -the hourly accumulation divided by the total cumber of spaces. 3) Turnover -the number of different cars parked divided by the number of parking spaces. In order to determine the number of different cars, the program reads the license numbers of the cars pazked in cotuecudve hoots and then compazes them. Each new li«nse is flagged and the tabulaud This process is repeated for eacL succeeding Lour. 4) Vehicle Hoots -the total number of vehicles counted in the survey during the entue day divided by the number of survey periods per hour. S) Average Duration -the vehicle hours divided by the number of different vehicles. 10 m ~ Z 3f1N3AH 37f1bdS O ~ ~ ~ a ~ .. 7 J R F- ^-' ~ ? ~. Ci _~ O ~___ ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ m O i I N ~ ~ ~ ____~ _~ •~ d C ~ ~. m U a. ..7 W ~ O F¢ V ~ v Z3 ~ m V C N I Q T Y y N a m% 4i T ~ ~ ~~ R ~ ~ r ti ~ ~ • '. _ J ¢ A~ ~ ~ t' ` w h~~ / O ~ L._~ l~ 1 `_r ~ 0 4 tp I .J. 2 ~ O O~j ~ ¢ y r__i r W ti '~ E ^ ~ / ~ s Z ~ 'Z- ~ ~ W O / W V W ~ z N ~ W C7 ~ U Z [~ 3 °C o a W oti ~ M a ¢ N F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ } a rt, ~ J L r J ~ 1 W N. 3f1N3~tl N3~dH m ~ N Q W 0 ~a m y ;~o m ~ .r CV .~ ~ ~ F ~a ~ ~U Z .~ .G c~ ~ ~ ~ .~ m. m ti.- ~ w~ W W Q' = Y O O x ~ G,~`` 9 _. i ~ i o R JP~' W a 4 min _~ / o ~ IIr,~-`~IjI < ~ 4J a m a a °a Q a W Z W ~a ~ Z ~ y W C ~' ~ `m V' N .~, _ ~ J 2 ~~v¢i ~ .-°a~ j Y ~ a f.. a N ~ 3f1N3Atl N3AtlH ~ H- ~ 0 Q,' } W 4 F' J W H y 7.0 CASE STUDIES Pazking surveys were conducted at two shopping centers in dte City to use as case studies in analyzing parking ratios. The surveys were conducted from lOAM to SPM on a Friday and Saturday at each center. The centers surveyed were the Terra Vista Town Center at Foothill and Haven and Terra Vista Village at Baseline Road and Haven. These centers were determined to be representative of a small to medium and lazge center. The surveys were performed on January 31, and February I, 1992. Some additional surveys were conducted during February to augment data lost due to rain. Ia order to convert the survey results into a parking ratio, it is necessary to imow the total occupied square footage. Lewis Homes, the owner and manager of both sites provided a listing of the squaze footage leased and vacant at each site as well as the number of parking spaces for each site. A summary of that listing is in Table 4. TABLE 4 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY OF SURVEY SITES Tetra Vista Town Center Terra Vista Village Approved Development 579,270 136,169 Qtrtently Constructed 487,549 136,169 Vacant 97,183 4,070 Occupied Doting Survey 390,366 132,099 Pazking Provided 3,306 704 The results of the hourly parking survey are sutnmariud in Table 5. FEgurts 3 and 4 illustrates the results graphically. As can be seen from both the Figures and Table, parking utilization during the survey period did not exceed 60.4% of the spaces at Terra Vista Village (Friday at noon) or 29S% of the spans at Terra Vista Town Center (Saturday 2:OOPM). Those results should be viewed with the understanding that the Survey was conducted during a relatively slow time of the year for retail sales, and in the case of Terra Vista Town Center, more than 20% of the leasable floor space is vacant. The vacancy factor can be accounted for by excluding vacant Ooor space from the parking index calculation For example, dividing the total number of parking spaces occupied (as determined by the parking survey Table 5) by the square footage of occupied leased space, in thousands (from Table 4), you obtain the parking ratio: TERRA VISTA VII.LAGE 426/132 = 3.2 cars parked per 1000 sq. tt, occupied space TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER 1004/390.4 = 2.6 cars per 1000 sq. R occupied space 11 TABLE 5 PARKING SURVEY RESULTS TERRA VISTA VILLAGE FRIDAY SATURDAY TIME CAR S PERCENT CARS PERCENT PARKED UTILIZED PARKED UTILIZED 10:00?u'vf 260 36.8 231 38.6 11:00 316 44.8 391 573 12Ni7OIS ''. . .426u ~ .: =~ifL•T ,: ~ ;~~ a;. , r.S3 ^°""~t .,,< 1:00 PM 383 543 345 49S 2:00 332 47.0 312 463 3:00 317 44.9 323 47.0 4:00 327 463 304 443 5:00 373 52.9 280 40.0 6:00 407 57.7 316 41.0 7:00 364 51.6 282 35.9 8:00 PM 303 42.9 253 31.0 TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER FRIDAY SATURDAY TIME CAR S PERCENT CARS PERCENT PARKED UTILIZED PARKED UTILIZED 10:00AM Sil 12.8 410 12.0 11:00 731 16.2 609 17.9 12 NOON 804 20.1 761 22.4 I:00 PM 798 20.7 902 26S 3:00 657 19.8 914 26.9 4:00 579 17S 839 24.7 5:00 640 16.5 631 18.6 6:00 592 16.1 602 17.7 7:00 571 17.2 560 16S 8:00 PM 563 15.9 487 143 n O _ a M . i.".3~8=' ~ U ~~.:: ~ V C G t ~ T Q p } 9 ~ g (~ a ~ y ~ (~ y ~ ~ ti to U ~ ~ Obi {~{ p i-7 ~ U ~ ~ M ~ 2 (~ Y w Y ~ ~ ~ W F~. d Q '.1". LO 0 a a ~~ Q T H ~ ~ g o 2 j Q I ~ Q ~' 5 $ LL _ W C7 J ' g (W~ O_ N ~ F' Q g J J W ~ 7 ~ s s( U ~ V N ~ s d O Q ? Q a+~iay c,o~ FW- 4 a 100 w m Q ~ LL u p C N T a O N ~ ~ ~ ~ Q t~ 11 (.1 ^ ~ ~ N `~ W 0 ~ I g c ~~ ~ ~ o z ~ _ _ ° .T ~ Y Q V+~' ~ a g m g, K ~ ~ Q ^ i o a o I ~ . ~ x as rc i oq a g 4 m~ N O Z a ~ a c S ~ o I 0 E ~ LL ~ I 2 W I $ ~j W 2 Z W s U ~ 3 ~ o J I Z N g ~ i ~ U s ~ ~ C7 s > ? Y ~ ~ Q W 4. ~a~,oy cm~ f., 101 8.0 USES GIVEN SPECIAL CONSIDERATTON CeRain uses that aze ofren included is shopping ttnters have unique pazking characterisiia that may not be similaz to the overall shopping center pazking characteristic These uses were singled out in the ULI Siudy for special wasideration, and similazly are here examined individually to determine thew impact on the overall pazkiag index, and consequently, how they should be addressed is any parking ordinance. Restaurant A use identified in the ULI study ac requiring special consideration, and one included as an exception to base taro is the phone survey for all cities that had exceptions was the restawant category. It is usually broken into categories such as fast food or drive-in and sit dowq family or quality, to reflect differences in the turn over rate at different types of food service. Several free standing resatrants aze located at the centers surveyed. This has provided an opportunity to analyze their parking demand separate from the rest of the center. Because pazldng for all the trsu is commoq it can not be definitively determined that cos parked in the vicinity of those restaurants are those of restawant patrons. However, based on the proximity of the lots chosen for the retawant analysis and the time those uses peaked most other stores in the centers were closed, the assumption is reasonable. The most clearly delineated pazking situation is for Chili's at Terra Vista Town Center. The restawant site is rotated on the southern most boundary of the site, next to an access driveway. Adjacent to the building and separated from other pazking by drive aisles is a one hundred space pazking lot. No other business is within 300 feet of the site. The resulLS of the survey are shown in Table 6 and graphirdlly in Figure 5. TABLE 6 PARKING DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS CHILI'S RESTAURANT TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER FRIDAY SATURDAY TIME CARS PARKED UTILIZATION CARS PARKED UlII~7A1ION 10:00 3 2.9 7 6.8 11:00 6 S.8 6 5.8 17.:00 66 64.7 32 31,3 13:00 19 18.6 43 42.1 14:00 46 45.0 44 43.1 15:Q0 22 21S 2$ 27.4 16:00 35 34.3 33 32? 17:00 40 392 37 36.2 18:00 88 $ti2 62 60.7 19:00 81 79.4 69 67.6 20:00 N/D(1) N/A 70 68.6 (1) No data >Z r m ~ ~ Q LL 8 R 0 m g Vl d o ~ ~ m ~~ .~ ~ ~ ~U $ p '~ z ~ ~ t ~ F W m ~~ _ • g ~ p Fes[. Y ~ Q x RI ~ + O q d 4 m [mn y • g J ~ S U o G . g W I 40 2 E W F U O 8 Z ~ ~ O_ Fa- ~ 8 a > e ~ ~ ~ Q m ~ S $ ~ w W 8 V F- ~ E ~ ~ V ~ H s ~ ' C7 8 ? i i ._ Y a a • g N 0 J $ 8 ~ ~ 53 S R R ~ v W~~qi sips 1os The average duration of pazking on Friday was .73 hours and on Saturday it was I.Ol hours. As can be seen from the above Table the peak pazking period occurred Friday evening during the 6 PM survey period. That peak demand was 8$ cars. The restaurant is shown to be 6000 square feet on the lease records. That equates to a pazking ratio of 15 cars per 1000 square feet of leasable space (88/6 = 14.7). The Cit}~s restaurant pazking requirement is 10 spaces per 1000 squaze feet For purposes of comparison, a similaz analysis was performed at the Terra Vista Village center. At that location a Coco's and Salsitas restauranu occupy the southwest comer. They aze between two access drives which tend to separate them from the other uses, in the center. Within the comer formed by the two access drives aze two lots of parking. Cars in these lots were assumed to be parking for the two restaurants for this analysis. Table 7 and Figure 6 show the parking demand chazatteristia observed during the survey period. TABLE 7 PARKING DEMAND CHARACTERISTICS COCO'S/SALSTTAS RESTAURANTS TERRA VISTA VILLAGE FRIDAY SATURDAY TIME CARS PARKED UTILIZATION CARS PARKED UIII.I7ATION 10:00 47 34.6 71 51.4 11:00 48 34.8 70 50.7 12:00 86 623 76 55.1 13:00 83 60.1 71 51.4 14:00 62 44.9 49 35.5 15:00 35 25.4 47 34.1 16:00 33 23.9 46 333 17:00 63 45.6 50 36.2 18:00 101 73.2 97 703 19:00 99 71.7 87 63.0 20:00 99 71.7 88 63.8 The average duration of pazking on Friday was 13 hours and Saturday 132 hours. From the table the peak period can be identified as 6 PM for both days, with the Friday peak being slightly higher at 101 cars. The combined squaze footage of the two restaurants based on the leasing data is 9,776 square feet. That vaaslates into a parking ratio of 10 spaces per thousand (101/9.776 103). This is the same as the Cit}~s restaurant pazking requirement, but less than what was scen at Chili's at the Town Center. An analysis was conducted to determine the effeM the percentage of restaurant use is of the total GLA of a center. This was done by a<ain,;og 1 percent restaurant of a given center size, then calculating the pazking required for the restaurant at 10/1000 and the remainder of the center at 3.5/1000. 3S/1000 was used to reflect the LJLI rate without restaurant tuts. This was repeated for 2%, 3% etc up to t5%. The results, shown graphically in Figure 7 indicate that fora 135,000 squaze foot :.rater, a IS% restaurant component would leave a 13 r . •--_ _ -•~o~- m o `O LL s a T v L T 0 O j tE Jp IfJ N s 0 ~ tq li 6 ~ y C ~' I ~ ~~ i ~Ol m ~' 0U Q ~7 _ ~ ~ F ~ ~ o I ~. ~ s G x° w z ;; d mm a $ N m H g •• J H D z d i N ~ ~ g o U vi O E U S ~ _ ~ '° 2 m O ~ 8 tq h- U W ~-- J g ~ 8 ~ ~ J ~ J ~ ~ 6 U d 8 y U ~. d N I ~ 41 U ~ 11I ~ Z 0¢C ° O Y h U d R 8 8 8 S R a. f W7+4f tioJ 1~ ~ 0 _o n c ~ 51 ~ ? I f~ Y ~ i Cl ~ m do F tag mN~ ~ ~~ o <<~ ~ °~ z o O ^~ o Ol ~~,, C >, c 3 0 =~c b ~ 6 ~ v ~m ~ ' ~ ~ ac ~ • 0 W O ~ W i t U ~ O Q~ a m~ w ~ 9 a a ! 5 Q ! f 4 w ~ O I L w U I ~ Z 55~~ qq QQ yQ~ O ~ W ~ ~S ffi ~ M 2G g ~ ~ Q ONM130 9111JMId V ~ W ~ a o W w l7 ~, w ~ a z Q ~ ~ ~ x °~ ~ z ,~ ~ a s ~ ~ a ~ m a J a a LL 6 ~,,, F ~ ~ ¢ ~ z ~ m a Q ~ M i o O a H y W Q 2W buffer of empty spaces equal to 11% of the total parking requirement based on 5 spaces per 1,000 GL.A. Cinemas, or movie theaters, as might be expected, tend to experience peak parking demand in the evening. This is offset from the typical Saturdaya~cemoon peak experienced by most shopping centers. It does, however, cortespond with a smaller peak that typically occurs Friday evening. In fact, it may have a significant role in the occurrence of Otat secondary peak Terra Vista Town Center is the site of an Edwards six•screen theater. The theater is located next to a 448 space parking lot separate from parking for the remainder of the shopping center, identified as lot 16 in the survey. Observations indipte that lot, and the adjacent food court lot (number 17 in the sttrvey) with 120 spaces, are the primary source of parking for movie patrons. Analysis of the data collected in the Friday survey of Terra Vista Town Center showed a distinct surge in parking demand in lot 16 at 8 PM, the final hour of the survey. That surge peak is assumed to be related to the cinema. Any analysis of the number of cars parked must be done with the caveat that those cars have not been positively linked to the theater use, and it is likely [hat some are associated with other uses. Conversely, it is likely that some patrons of the theater have parked in lots other than those considered in the analysis. Despite these anomalies it is assumed that the survey data is acceptable for this parking analysis. Total parking in lot 16 and 17 at 8PM on Friday is 187 cars and on Saturday it is 225 cars. The lease for Edwards Cinema is fora 1500 seat [beater. 225 cars /1500 seats = .15 cars per seat or, inversely, 1 car per 6.7 seats. The City's ordinance calls for 1 space per 4 Seats, plus 5 spaces for employees. The Ltstitute of Transportation Engineers pubticadon "Parking Generation", estimates an average rate of demand per seat an Sattuday as 026 or i car per 3.8 seats. The survey results can be adjusted to an estimated 80% of annual pcak demand using data developed in another ULI srudy, "Shared Parking". That publication developed Cinema Monthly Variation In Peak Parking Accumulations (Exhibit 12, page 23). That figure shows that in Febmary, Saturday peak demand is 70 percent of the annual peak demand. Converting 225 then to a peak demand yields 321 cars parked and 80 percent of Wat peak will be 257. Adding 10 percent for operating efficienry yields 283 spaces, or one space per 53 seats. Office The last category for which the fII.I Study recommends special consideration is Office. Neither of the sites had an observable parking demand that could be attnbuted to the office use. It should be noted that the City's parking requirement for office uses other than medical and dental is 4/1000, We same or less than the LJLI recommended shopping center requirement. 14 Excluding office ttu, the land uses identified for special consideration by UI.i peak is the everting, as the retail peak is typically declining. It is that offset in the peak time that allows those uses to be included in the mix without special pazking requirements. Any exceu parking demand generated by restaurants or cinemas can utilize surplus parking normally used by the retail uses at the center. Table 8 demonstrates how the Terra Vista Town Center parking supply would accommodate a theoretical combination of uses at 8 PM. The example is baud on full build out of the approved square footage, and 15% restaurant use. TABLE 8 EFFECT' OF COMBINED RESTAURANT AND CINEMA PEAK PARING LAND USE SQUARE FOOTAGE PARKING DEMAND Restaurant 86,890(1) 869(2) Cinema 24,745(3) 375(4) Retail 467,635(5) 982(6) Total 579,270 2226 Parking Supply 2896(7) Surplus 670 (23%) 1. Assumes a maximum 15% restaurant usage. 2. Based on 10 spaces per 1000 square feet 3. 13dtvards actual square footage. 4. Bated on I1'E parkitrg rate of 1 spa« per 3.8 seats. 5. Square footage remaining from 579,270 square feet approved for Town Center, after restaurant and Cinema subtracted. 6.' Baud on 5 spaces per thousand of remaining stluare footage, factored by 42%a to reElea accumulation per«ntage at 8 PM (as pet UL.n. 7. Baud on 579,270 square feet at 5 spaces per thousand. This analysis does not include consideration for redprocal use. That is the occupants of one car(one parking spa«) going to both the restaurant and cinema or some other combination of two ores while using only one parking spa«. A previous study prepared for the City which investigated reciprocal uu at the Virginia Daze Center, found and average of 12% of the patrons were reciprocal users. Applying that figure to the above analysis reduces the total pazkirrg demand to 1959 spaces and increases the surplus to 937 spaces. t5 w 9.0 DESIGN DEMAND The LJLI Pazking Requirements for Shopping Centers and other pazking srudies, recommend that 80% of the peak pazking demand be used for designing lots, or setting parking requirements. That study had the benefit of many years of parking counts at many differea[ shopping centers to determine peak demands. Extensive historical data of that type was not available for this project. Consequently, another technique was used for this project. Ii is generally accepted in the industry and stated in the ULI as well as other studies, that the Saturday before Christmas, a[ mid- afternoon, is the busiest shopping day and comequeally the highest demand pazkiag day of the yeaz. An aerial photo was taken of the Terra Vista Town Center at 2 PM on December 21, 1991, the Saturday before Christmas, in an effort to establish a peak parking demand at the center. The results of analysis of that photo are as follows Total Cars Parked 1853 Cars in Aisle 34 Cars Circulating 64 Total on site 1951 To determine a pazking demand for design or ordinance purposes, 85% of the pcak was assumed for this srudy. That 5gure is more conservative than the ULI Study aced is based on recommendations in the ENO foundation report It also reflects a broader size range of centers. Total Cars Pazked 1853 Totai Cars on Site 1951 .85 .85 Design Demand 1575 Design Demand 1658 To determine the pazking index this demand equates to we use the total occupied leased squaze footage referenced earlier as provided by Lewis Homes. That figure was 390,270 for Terra Vista Town Center. Parking indices aze expressed in terms of 1/1000 square feet of grossed leasable area, which wtrverts to 390.4. Dividing the pazking demand by the occupied gross leasable sgttaze footage yields the following: Design Demand 1575/390.4 = 4.0 Design Demand 1658/390.4 = 41 The above calculadona estimate the 85th percentile pazking demand based on an assumed annual peak parking demand determined from an aerial photograph taken at 2 PM on December 21, 1991, the Sattrday before Christmas. For operatiottal purposes, when designing a pazking lot, or in this case developing an ordinance, Eiom which parking lots will be designed, some pazkiog spaces in excess to the number of pazked cars should be provided. This excess is sometimes referred to as a buffer, and accomplishes severai things. 16 ..~.__ First, it reduces the number of, and time, vehicles c'uculate through the lot looking for empty spaces, thereby reducing internak congestion. It offseu pulses in the arrivals and departures of vehicles by providing a reservov of empty spaces, and finally, it addresses the perception that lots aze full when they aze not Studies have shown that bepuse of the need to "seazch" for spaces or when arrivals out number departures during a short period, drivers perceive a pazldng lot is full when it is actually between 80 and 90 percent capacity. Pazldng buffets typically range between 5 and 15 percent depending on the use. High turnover uses tend to need higher buffers. Shopping centers typially represent intermediate turn over with pazldng durations between one and two hours. A reasonable buffer would appeaz to be 10 percent Applying that 10 percent buffer to the design demand results in the following. Demand 1575 Demand 1678 10% Buffer 158 10°!a Buffer 168 Supply 1733 Supply 1846 Again, for comparison purposes converting the supply to a parking ratio: PARKII~TG SUPPLY 1733/390.4 = 4.4 spaces per 1000 sgttare feet occupied span PARIQNG SUPPLY 1846/390.4 = 4.7 spaces per 1000 stpmre feet occupied space 17 ,._ .. 10.0 CONCLUSIONS The fmdings of this study generally indicate that the UL.I Study's overall findings aze valid for Ute City of Rancho Cucamonga. Based on the design demand developed in this report, and additional literature review: "pazlinc" published in 1990 by the ENO Foundatioq and "pa_rkfnQ Generation" 2nd Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, however, a base pazking rate of 5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area rather than the range of 4 through 5 per 1(1(10 recommended by the iJLI Smdy, is recommended for Rancho Cucamonga As reported by theENO foundation the SS percentile value of all sized centers surveyed in the ITE "ParldnQ Generation" study is 5 per 1000. Eno itself remmmeads a range of from 4S to SS per thousand. The analysis of peak pazliag done in this study revealed a pazldag indices of between 4.4 and 4.7 spaces per thousand when a 10% buffer is included. Abase rate of 5 per 1000 has been chosen for all but the largest centers to simplify the code requirement, prevent applicanu from attempting to design a project a few squaze feet below a break point in the rode to reduce their parking requirement, and finally as a ronservative response to the uncertaiary of the annual peak data due to the current economic conditions and the relative newness of the Terra Vista Town Center. The proposed base rate will allow the development community to more aggressively market their developmenu by knowing that regardless of the ttse, the parking supply will be adequate. Inclusion of 15'Yo of the gross square footage of the site as restaurant can be accommodated by the difference in peak demand periods between restaurant and shopping center usage. Although the restatrant pazking demand at Chili's restaurant actually exceeded the Ciry pazking regttuement, it did so after 6 P114, when the other portions of the centers were at their lowest usage. Also, when other less intensive food service uses, such as those at the food mart, are factored in, the overall restaurant pazling will be less. 18 _ ..... _il~-..-. 11.0 PROPOSED ORDINANCE REVISION The following provisions will supersede Section 17.12.040.B.1. "COMMERCIAL, RETAIL. AND SERVICE USES" of the City Municipal Code. The Cit7~s current pazldng code is included in Appendix A for comparison. B. Commercial/Office Commercial, Re[ail and Setice Uses: (a) Shopping Centers of less than 25,000 square feet The pazlang requued will be the sum of parking requirements for the individual uses. (b) Shopping Centers of more than 25,000 squaze feet and less than 1,000,000 square feet of gross leasable azea: (1) Shopping Centers of less than 600,000 square feet, but more than 25,000 square feet of gross leasable area: Five (5) parting spaces for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of gross leasable area shall be provided. (2) Shopping Centets of 600,000 to 1,000,000 square feet of gross leasable area: Five and one half (55) parking spatxs for each one thousand (1,000) squara feet of gross leasable area shall be provided. (3) Ia addition to the above pazking requirements, the following speaal Par~B Provisions shall apply: (i) Food Service (defined as restaurants, taverns, lounges and other establishments for the sale and consumption oa the premises of food sad beverages): If over fifteen perant (15%) of the gross leasable area is ocwpied Iry food servix uses, one (1) additional space per one hundred (100) square feet of the gross leasable azea used for food service shall be provided. (ii) Cinemas in shopping anurs of less than 100,000 square feet: Three (3) additional parting spaces per one hundred (100) theater seats shall be provided. (iii) Cinemas in shopping aaurs of 100,000 to 200,000 square feet: No additional parking spans shall be required for the fast fow hundred fifty (450) theater Beau; three (3) additional parting spaces per one hundred (100) theaur seats for each seat over fow hundred fifty (450) shall be provided. 19 (iv) Cinemas itt shopping centers of over 200,000 square feet of gross leasable azea: No additional pazlang spaces shall be required for the first seven hundred [fifty (750) theater seats; three (3) additional pazldng spaces per one hundred (100) theater Beau for each seat over seven hundred fifty (750) shall be provided (v) Offices (including medical and dental): If over ten percent (10%) of the gross leasable azea is occupied by office use, a special pazldng study prepared in accordance with City standards, as specified by We City Planner, shall be prepared by the applicant at the applicant's expense. Pazldng requrmements for the office use shall be established based on the City Planner's review and approval of said sperial pazldng srudy. (b) Slopping Centers of over 1,000,000 square feet of gross leasable azea: A special pazldng srudy prepared in accordance with City standards, as specified by the City Planner, shall be prepaed by the applicant at the app6eanPs expense. Parking requirements for the shoppitg center shall be established based on the City Planner's review and approval of said special pazlcing study. 20 .. fi3._. 12.0 EFFECTS ON EXISTING CENTERS Adoption of the proposed ordinance will effect different centers differently. Oider centers, such az the Music Plus and Rancho Town Center were developed under the County juris- diction and had less parking required than under the current City ordinance. Those centers will be more imparted than newer centers rnnstruMed under the existing ordinance. As was seen in the case study of Terra Vista Town Center, the current ordinance has resulted in more parking being provided than would be required under the proposed ordinance. Table 9 provides a comparison of the existing parking supply at the centers renewed for this study and Ute amount of parking that would be required at those centers under the proposed ordinance. Figures 8 and 9 show the rnmparison graphically for the two centers surveyed. TABLE 9 COMPARISON OF THE PARKING SUPPLY AT EXISTTNG CENTERS TO THE PROPOSED REQUIREMENT CENTER EXISTING PROPOSED SURPLUS/ SUPPLY REQUIREMENT (DEFICIT) Vineyards Marketplace 494 spaces 607 spaces (113) Central Park Plaza 522 spaces 568 spaces (46) Foothill Village 433 spaces 434 spaces (i) Music Plus Center 144 spaces 143 spaces 1 Rancho Town Center 830 spaces 852 spaces (22) Terra Vista Village 704 spaces 684 spaces 20 Terra Vista Town Center 3,306 spaces 2,892 spaces 414 21 114 m ~ eo _o m s LL 0 N m ~ ~ c S P] 7' Q ~ O ~ Z q V Q O ~ ~ y S-'~ ?' O m W li y U a ~.7 = C Um t d u V y I Im iU Q F m ~ O o~ ~ $ + O m a~ y D ~ 2 p .~ a ~ S a ~ . D E 2 F a q W ' 4 Q ~ I Q ' s W W o - pZ0 ~ s a0 Z N i iV O ~ I - W 3 s ~' Z ~ rW- $ O Z H ' ~ Vp> W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W ac v~~ ~ ~ W H _..._. ~1~ _.. m ~ O~ E O m ~ m v g ~ s R ~ ~ °o m v ~ n ~ ~ T S in v i 8 W vi 0 =~ z a g O a p I ~ m C Um 2 (~ ~ a Y S ~ ~U Q F o e Q o°O ~ o S a :o m a ~ o o S Q E a ~ 0 LL ~ g W ~ 8 W Q a I $ a0~ j ~ OW> ~ I aZ H OZ~ . $ WOQ ~ ~ s ~ ~ $ ~ ~ s W F aim ~ _...__ - llFr- APPENDIX A CURRENT CITY PARING CODE 4 i a? 7s a`~ 5 T 4 F" C~c~lon lr.lz.aao 9eetion 17.12.00 park inR Beauir~nta The following sections tilt the requ:red anuunt of parking for each category of uses, special requirernen is and optional requirenents. A. Residential 1. Single-tent ly detached dwellings (conventional). TM,o (2) parking spaces within a garage. 3. Cluster development (condanin tum, townhme, etc.) Beni-detached single temily (zero let line, patio hones, duplexes, etc.) and nubile horre parks: (a) Studio: 1.: off-street park itfQ space per wit of which one space shall be in a garage or carport. (b) ~.x:e (1) bedtoen: 1.5 oft-street parking spaces per unit of which one space shall be in a garage or carport. (c) Tivo (2) t:edroaro: 1.8 off-street puking apsces per wit• of which one space :hull De in a garage or carport. (d) Three (3) or more Dadroone: 1Mo ott-street parking spaces per wit of which two apacea shall De in a garage or carport. (e) Four (4) or rtore bedrooms: 2.3 oft-street parking spaces per wit of wh ieh two spatts shall he in a garage or carport. (f) In addition to the required nmtDee of parkiryf spaces for each wit, one off-street uncovered parking space shall be provided for each four vita for visitor parking. For single family zero lot line, patio hones, and duplexes, on-street perking stay be substituted for visitor parking, where sufficient street pavetent width end dlatsnce between driveways has been provided. (g) Fifty percent (SOK) of the total required covered spaces shall be within enclosed garage structures. (h) Por developsenta contatning five or :mre units, up to thirty- five (3Sj parMnt of the required wcovered spseea nay be ompaet car size. (i) 'fhe use o[ carports requlrea approval trap the Design Review (ktmittee. B. Camercisl/Office 1. Camercisl, retail end service uses: 125- l 11/18/gi)18 Sectior, 15.13.0{0 (a) Neighborhood and general comae rcial shopping centers: Ote (1) off-street parking stall for each rwo hundred end Cifty (250) square feet oC gross floor area Cor ell buildings and/or uses in the center. (b) Camvnity and regional shopping centers: Cho (i) off-street parking stall for each two hundred-!wenty (220) square feet oC gross floor area. 'R:e above requirarents will apply for all camtercial centers in the city; however, whenever delineation of independent uses is required, the following standards shall apply: (c) Autatobile washing and cleaning esteDlistsnents, except selt- service: Sixteen (10) parking stalls. (d) self-service autatnbile washes: 2.5 for each washing stnil. (e) Autambile service and gas station: Three (s) spaces plus two (2) toe each service bey. (f) Berber shops or beauty parlors: 19so (2) for each Dnrber chair; three (3) [or each beautician station. (g) Hui ld togs uses aolety foe coin-operated laundrmnts or dry cleaning establistrtenU: Qtr for each three (3) wash ittg rtechines. (h) Offices, cannere cal banks, sav it:gs end loan of !ices, ocher financial institutions, general retsil stores, food stores, supertmrkets, and drug stores: Cna for each two hundred fifty (250) square feet of gross floor areas. (i) Contractor's storage yards in eoMaction with contractor's business; salvage yard; funk.ysrd, autambile tvreek lttg yard; storage yard: six (8) spaces separated fean the enclosed storage area. (f) Iurber yards: One for each three hundred (300) square feet of gross Ilaor aces for retail sales, plus one for each one thousand (1,000) square feet of open eras devoted to dlsPlay (partially covered, by root, awning, etc.) or sales. (k) Mortusries and funeral Ames: One (1) parking stall for every twenty-five (28) square feet or traction thereof of asserDly roan or floor area. (1) Motels end hotels: CTe (1) parkittg apace foe each guest unit end two (2) spaces for resident manager or orator. -128- t Ili lBie~ )119 Secaon :,.i!.wu (m) Motor vehicle sales end automotive repair, painting, body work or service: One per [our hundred (400) square feet of gross floor area. (n) Scores solely Cor the sale of furniture end appliances: One foe each Cive hundred (S00) square feet of gross floor area. (o) Trade schools, business crolleges end cram merciel schools: One for each three (3) student capacity o[ each classroom plus one for each faculty member or employee. 2. Commercial recreation uses: (a) Bowling alleys end/or billiard halls: Five (S) for each alley end/or two (2) for each billiard table contained therein. (b) Commercial stables: One (1) accessible space for ench five (5) horses boarded on the premises. (c) Driving ranges (golf): One per tee, plus the spaces required for additional asps on the site. (d) Golf rntuaes (regulation couneh S[x (8) per hole plus the spaces required for additional was on the site. (e) ^Pttch end Putt" end miniature golf coupe: Three (3) per hole, plw regturcmenn for aaeessary was. (t) Skating ttinlts, lee or roller: One far each one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor Brea, plw the space required [or additional was on the site. (g) Swimming pool (commercial): One for each one hundred (100) square feet of water surface, plw one stall for each employee, but not less then ten (10) stalls fm any such we. (h) Tennis, hertdDall and racquetball taciiitiea: Three (3) for ench court plus the spaces required far atditional uses on the site. 3. Educational wee: (a) Flementsry and jtmior high schools: Two (2) tar each elasxoom. (b) Senior high schools: Ona for each member of the faculty end each employee, plus one tar each six (8) studenU regularly enrolled. (c) Colleges, universitlw end iretltutiom of higher learning, paroehiel and private: One for each three (3) students plw one for each two (2) member of the tnculty end employees. 4. Health tows (a) Dental clinics ar offices; medical ellrtics or atticea, veterinary haepitals end clinin: One for each two hundred (200) square feet of groan floor area. -127- ILM1I 9 Section 77.12.040 (b) Convalescent and nursing homes, homm ai aged, rest homes, children's homes end sanitariums: One for every four (4) beds in accordance with the resident capacity o[ the Dome as listed on the required License or permit. (c) Haspitak: One and seventy-five hundredths (1.76) for each patient bed. (d) Health studios end spas: One for each one hundred fifty (150) square feet o[ gross floor area. (For the purpose of this subsection, swimming pool area shell De counted es floor area. 5. Industrial and like uses: (a) %ell industrial Urea are subject to the provisions of Ne perking standards end requirements m rnntained in the Industrial Specific Plan. (b) Public utility [acilitim including, but tat limited to electric, gas, water, telephone and telegraph tacilitlm not having businem offices on the pre mism: Ona tar each two (R) employem 1n the Iergmt shift plm one for each vehicle used !n rnnneatlon with the use. A minimum of two (2) space shall De provided far each such use regardless of builditrg spatt ar number of employees. 6. Places of auemDly: (s) Reataurenb, Lverns, loungm and other mtabOshmenb for the sale end rnmumptlon on the promiam of food end beverages: One (1) space for every one hwdred (100) square feet of groa floor Brea ttp to six thousand (6,000) square feet plus one tar each additlonal tttty-five (SS) square feet of grass floor ve• over six thousand (6,000) square feet. (b) Peat food rmtaurenb (with ar without drive-throb One (1) perking apace for ach 75 aquae reef of prom noon area. (c) Auditoriums, sparb arena, stadlumu Oaa tar each three (0) aeab or one far each thirty-five (3S) aquera feet of gross hoar area where there ere no fixed aeab. (d) Theaters, movies: (1) Single Screen: Ona (1) spelt per 3 aeab, plus S tar employem (2) Multl~areen: Ona (1) apace par 4 seats, plus S ror employes. (e) I.ibrarim: One for each three hundred (000) square feet of gross floor arcs. (t) Private clubs, lodge halls, union hudquarten: One for each seventy-flue (TS) aquae feet o! eroea close area. -126- 121 (g) Churches end other places of assembly not specified above: One for each four (4) fixed seats within the main auditorium or one for each thirty-Gve (35) square feet o[ seating area within the main auditorium where there are no fixed seass; eighteen (18) linear inches of bench shall be cronsidered a fixed seat. 7. Other uses: (a) Day nurseries, including preschools end nursery schools: One stall for each staff member, plus one for each five (5) children. C. S eci~sl Re usre~menfs. The following parking requirements ere applicable to all commeresal end office lessd sup. Thee special sta)Ls shall tx closest to the facility [or which they ere designated in order to encourage their use. 1. Handicapped: Those facilltin with twenty-Gve (25) or more 'spaces shall designate two {2) percent or one (1) space, whicheverv greater, o[ the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. The designatlon and design shall rnnfarm to state standards. 2. Motorcycle: Facil)ties with twenty-Gve (25) or mare parking spaces shall provide at tees[ one designated parking Brea tar use Dy motorcycia. Developmenb with over one hundred (100) spaces shall provide motorcycle perking at the rate o[ one percent. Arens delineated [or use by motorcycles shall meet standards set Carth in su6snctim 17.12.030-C-1. 3. Compact csra: Pacilities with twenty-Gve (25) a more perking spaces may provide ssp to thirty-Gve (35) percent of ib parklrsg tar use 6y compact can. Spaces delineated for compset ter use shall meet standards set torch (n sutuectian 17.12.030-A-2. 4. Bicycles: All mmmerciel and office areas ahaG provide adequate lacking tacilitiea far bicycle perking at any location convenient to the facility for which they ere designated. Whenever passible, weatherproofing a facility rnvering should be used. 5. Car pools: Ottytreet parking provided far commerMeUotfiee facilities shall provide at leaf ten (10) percent of the total parkirsg area ss desigmtad for use by car pools. 8. DrivrThru Pacilltiaas Drive-thru tecilltia~ regWrs special cotmideration as their design ten significantly impact the vehicular circulation on a site. The following resryittimanb apply to any use with drivrtheu taeilltias. (a) Each drtvrthru lens shall Ds separated from tM circulation routes necessuy far irsgreas or egress from the property, ar eeceas. to any Parking spats. (b) Each s4lvrthru lane shat be atrtpad, marked, ar otherwise distinctly delineated. -129- 122 JCN 6 '93 1.3:36 ~YIa-0.sv FaxTrans_mittal Memo ~~7 CO1G za ~ FaI• :; *nt^:f January S, 1993 FRp,h FAD 'ECH 5 ~ BEAh, l~ 7672 ~~,/' tiey=eo„ A :xarrDa~ Y~D YY'1Q.h._ F~a ~'.l"1lr1Gt' ~~i ~D~ .o~cam ~.xmx .:~~ rsspe fr~crcr.• Fai• '..w. vr.a asy;am ~1na I~c., y. r FGE.~ I `art J ~n rr.rx~: P'~o lYOenelsyMF Pannrg 650E H~tm:atr ure 6gmeenng s~ro 3Y] T~ansportabon Sa^ 9errar0~n, f~ .~°Og Erc;~ronmerm: 'Ax r'°~5a5~OSM Economrcy 7r <~885°°CS ;,anCSCaoe A~chitecturc An Emp%KGrn00 C/~mPan~ . ~r d,uC G~~1V 5~ N NV "~pti4lN SAN 6 r X993 4M CMS Igt~tU-~it`'U3t4t5iE Dan Colcmaa Prinapal Planner 10500 GSvic Center Dave Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 SUBJECT: P.Uti1CING REQt1iREMENTS FOR THE VINEYARDS MARI~TPI.A,CE Dear Dan: As you requested, I bave reviewed the latest site plan for the above referenced project, dated S-1g-92, rnmpared the identi5ed pazking supply to both the proposed new parking requirement for shopping centers and the proposed interim requirements for centers under construction. The following report is a summary my findings. fSSIIE Will the proposed parking supply at Vineyards Mazkatplace be adequate for the that center in its buildout Configuration. PROJECT DESCRIPTION As cttrreatly con5gured the buildout of the Vineyards Marketplace will result in a total of 1~ 120,963 square feet of commercial develonnent and provide 520 parking spaces for a parking ratio of 4,3s V °"~ X""" "" Yd "'4f a~ru cnaeor PU9a 1~ 1 paces Per 1000 square t Beet. Ibis is based on my addition of the square footage provided for each building and varies from the summary provided on the plate (121, 378). The center is anchored by m .Albettsons market and Sawn Drugs. It also includes a Mobile gas station and Wells Fargo Sank in addition tp inline shops. No food services other than may be in Albertsons and the Mobile tninimart currently exist. Three pads remain to be consttuded, one of which will be a Taco HeU. 1~ JaN 6 _., 19:37 corm c;p -E^n EHN ag+N. Dan Coleman Ciry of Rancho Qtcamonga PARKING REQL7REMENT ?o GE.99Z January 5, 1993 Page 2 Under the proposed new parking requirements ordinance of 5 spatt per 1000 square feet of development, 605 pazking spaces would be retjttired for this tenter. That would result in a deficit of 85 spaces. tising the reduced ratio of 4.5 spaces per 1000 square fee[ of development the City is considering for projects approved under the current ordinancq 545 space would be required, resulting in a deScit of ?5 spaces. DESIGN HO[JR As part of the Shopping Center Parking Requirements Study, an analysis of the design hour was conducted. That srudy documented the generally accepted parking demand for design purposes as 35% of peak pazking demand. That percentage typically corresponds to the 2tkh highest hour of parking demand. Based on calculations performed on the survey information collected at Term Vista Town Center, the design demand for that cemer was estimated to be between 4.0 to 4.2 cars per 1000 square feet of development, without a buffer. Based on these data the madmum design hour for the Vineyards Marketplace is estimated at 503 (4.2/!000 x 120,963'). The project proposes 520 spaces and therefore would have a surplus of at least 12 spaces. E)f[STTNG DEMAND In order to develop a reference for this analysis, two spot surveys of existing parking demand were conducted. THc surveys were conducted on Saturday, December 12, 1992 between 230 and 3:00 PM and on Thursday December 17 from 4:30 to 5:00 PM. As discussed in the Shopping Center Parking Requirements Smdy the generally aclmowledged awual peak parking demand occurs ttrid~day on the several Saturdays between TLattksgiving and Christmas, reflecting the Christmas shopping rush, A5 a result the Saturday spot survey should have revealed the annual peak for the Vineyards Mazketplatt Center, On Saturday December 12, 1992, 196 vehicles were observed to be parked in the Vineyards Marketplace parking lot. Because that center is not currently rnmpleted, adjustments were made to reflect the currendy occupied space. Caleulatioas based on information obtained from the !casing agents for Vinryards Marketplace indicate that 94,283 square feet are currently leased. The parking demand during the spot survey can then be calculated at (196/943) 2.1 spaces per 1000 square feet of leased space, A second spMot survey was mndutted between on Thursday, Dettmber 17, 1992 between 4:30 dedtnand ratio duuring thatrsuiveytwaz calcv aced at (182/943) 193 spatts per IOOOPquare feet of occupied space. The similarity betweea the Thursday and Saturday results tends to reinforce the belief that the center does not have a strong peaking characteristic. With a strong peak, a greater variation between the survey results would be expected 1~ ~,. 6 ~., IB. on ~.~ Dace Coleman City of Rancho Cucamonga UNIQUE SITE CfiARACIERISTICS Pi+uE. a~3 January 5, 1993 Page 3 The surveys of the existing demand at the center indicate that the parking ratio at Vineyards Marketplace is below that of the centers studied for the ordinance. They. are utdque chazacteristics in the centers that explain the difference. Terra Vista Town Center is a larger center with a larger market area and has a tenant mix that results in strong seasonal peaking (Target, bfervyn's, Montgomery Wards, Ross). Terra Vista Village, which is similar in size (approximately lt)CO more leased space) has a Burger King, Cow's and Satsita's plus some smaller in-litre food services. Vineyards Markciplace on the other hand has Drily the Taco Bell (future) and afloat 1,000 square feet (asstmted in the project summary) of in lint food service. Although, as discussed in the Shopping Center Parking Requirements Smdy, restaurants peak at different times than shopping centers, major chain restaurants on satellite pads arc an intertce use and hays 70 - 854'o utilization factors doting the seaters peak. The absence of such tensors at the Vineyards Mazketplae reduces the parking demand relative to that seen at Terra Vista Village. The lack of any major department stores at Vineyazds Marketplace reduces seasonal peaking characteristics and further reduces the parking demand. Finatty, the land surrounding the Vineyards Marketplace is not yet buildout and the center has not reached its toll demand potential. This condition is also reflected in the low trafl5c volumes reported on adjacent street. Similarly, although Vineyards Marketplace is a community type center, and not oriented toward freeway traffic, it may receive additional demand from traffic accessing the State Rouu 30 freeway, when that facility is completed. SUMMARY A primary goals of the propoud new parking ordinaaa are 1) to provide a requirement, in which the City can be confident will meet the variotu parking demands of a wide range of tenant mixes sad center sizes, and 2) simplify the method of calculating parking requirements for a wide range of shopping center types. As such, the ordinance was structured to be conservative, which means in some cases providing more parking than is likely to be needed. The proponents of a new ordinance agreed with this approach in the interest of simplifying the process and gaining rho tnarkedng Flexibility they desired. At Vineyards Mar ctplace, because it is nearly completed, the tenant mix has been generally determined, and less flexibility in terms of marketing is needed. Also, this is a small senor, sad as such would be expected to generate parki,-ig in the Inwer portion of the tangs anticipaud by the ordinance. 126 JnN b 'b~ IC:.nn Fk0:" Pi- TE dM1 ERr1 EE kN. ~4dE .0D4 ~n Coleman January 5, 1993 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 CONCLUSION Considering the above, it is reasonable to conclude that the number of perking spaces currently planned at the Vineyard Marketplace should be sufficient to provide adequate pazkiag. Our most recent survey data show existing parking demand during the peak parking season is 2.1 spans per 1000 square feet of leaxd area Although this can be expected to inaease as the surcounding land is built out, unique characteristics of the Vineyard Market Place indicate that the parking demand will be less than typically required. "Chase unique characteristics include a low percentage of restaurant ux and no seasona0y pcaldng uses in the tenant min. It has been a pleasure to assist the City of Rancho Cucamonga in this matter. if you have arty questions or need additional informatlon, pleax do not hesitate to wll me. i look fo[ward to working with you in the future. Respea[ully Submitted P&D TECHNOLOGIES e%~~. ~~~~~t~n••ly Charles Spagnola Senior Transportation Planner cc John Potter, Hughe; Investments, Two Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, CA 97b5fS-8100 Rick Mager, Lewis Homes, 1156 N Mountain Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 1~ HL'l3HES INVESTMENTS OEVELOPHENT 6 ACOUI9ITIOM Of COMMERCIAL PROPEgTIE3 (;CT `61992 ~ n,tQ1~1t1211t213141~16 October 22, 1992 Mr. Dan Coleman Principal Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamoags, California RE: SHOPPING CENTER PARKING ORDINANCE REVISIONS Dear Dan: As you know, I have been iavoWed with Rick Mager of Lewis Home; yoarxlf and Chuck Spaptola of P & D Technologies in the research and preparation of a proposed revision to the current Shopping Center Parking Ordinanx m Ravcho Cucamonga. Over the past several months all of us have been involved in attempting to create a logical cannon sense approach to revising an esisting parting ordinance which tequves m inordinate amount of staff time to eaforee, and provides tew optiow for the development oommuniry, in both the site planning and budgetary process The result has been a proposed P~6 ordinance Prepared by P & D Technologies which in all xnxa is really a hybrid, which not only draws upon We information provided by professional organiutions loch u the 1fI,I and the International Caunct7 of Shopping Center, but alp draws upon the beat features of parking ordinances o[ 13 cities of simHar demographics. What P & D has now proposed to be prexnted to We Planning Commission is really a "state of the arP parking ordinance that embodies a methodology that is in keeping with today's realities in the shopping center development arena. The proposed ordinance provides a uxtul vehicle for both the city and city staff as well as the development community to plan, process and manage shopping center development and re- development w the City of Rancho Cncamongs. TWO CORPpaAT[ PLAIA•lUITL aSO~N(WPOIR BUCM, CA O1E00-YGYGr J///~"~ "Dv P, O. 00% eY00 ~ M[W POPT aCACM, CA peels-aY00 Vry ~x^ IYNI YlO~Yl01 %A%~ITMYlY~0~2a 1W Mr. Dan Coleman October 22, 1992 Page Two We wholeheartedty endorsed the propaaed revisona to the eaisting parking ordinance and look forward to the public hearing process so that we can demonstrate the benefits of this new parking ordinance to the Planning Commission, City Counct7 and the community at lazge. Very truly yours, HUGHES / ,~ i~~ . /John B. Potter JBP/ayc a: Rick Mager, Lewin Homa 1~ RESOLUTION NO. 93-;g A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISEION OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DE'JE LOPMENT CODE AME NOMENT 32-D'. AMENDING TITLE 17, CHA PTEA 17.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SHOPPING CENTER PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND HAKI NG FINpI NGS IN SVPPORT THEREOF. A. Rec it ale. (i) The City of Rancho Cucamonga hoe filetl an application far Development Code Amendment No. 92-01 as describetl in the title of thin AesvLut ion. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Oeve lopment Code Amendment is referred to ae "t re application." (ii) On the i3th day of Sanuary 1993, the Planning Commie eicn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and eon<lutled said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prereyu isitea prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Reaolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, antl resolved by the Planning Commission of the Cit }' of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 3. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Reeitals, Part A, of this Reaolution are true and correct. 2. eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Corm iaecon during the above-referenced public hearing on Sanuary 13, 1993, including written and oral staff repo rte, together with puhlic testimony, this Commission hereby apecif ically finds as follows: (a) Tha application applies eo property located within the r. ity; ar.d (b) The proposed amerdmenta will not have a significant impact on the environment as evidenced by the conclusions and find inge of the Initial Study, Porte I and II. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing antl upon the specific findings of Eacte set forth 1n paragraph 1 and 2 above, thra Commission hereby Einda and concludes ae foliowa: ~a) That ehie amendment does not confl rct with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan end wyll provide Eor development wit htn the d iatrict in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and 1° PLANNZ NG COMMZaS ION RESOLUTION NO. 9;-i9 OCA 92-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA Jaru ary 13 1993 Page 2 (b) That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives of the Development Code; and (c) That the proposed amendment w111 not be Betz imental to the public healc h, safety, or welfare oz materrally inju cious to propert lee oc improvements in the vicinity; and (a) That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the object ivea of the General Plan or the Development Cade. 6. This Commission hereby finds and cart if lea that the project has been reviewetl and cone idered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 19]0 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Nagatrve Declaration. 5. Bneed upon the findings and conelusione seC forth in paragraph 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves na fo llowe: (a) That the Planning Commis aion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 92-01 to modify the Mu ric ipal Code pet the attached Ordinance. 6. The Secretary ib this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Reaolut ion. APPROVED ANC ADOPTED THIS 13'PH DAY OF JANUARY 1993. PLANNING COM1fI SSION OF THE CITY OF MNCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST I, Bred Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commies ion of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cart iEy that the foregoing Rego LUtion was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and atlopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of Sanuary 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMHISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNSEL, MELCHER, V.4LLETTE NOES: COMHISS IONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERE: i'O LS TOY 131 ORDINANCE N0. ~QX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 92-01, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.12, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARD ING SHOPPING CENTER PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. T.HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECT ION 1: Section 17. 12.040. B.1 of Chapter 17.12 is hereby amended to read in words and figures as follows: B• COMMERCIAL/OFFICE 1. Cow,e rcial, Retail and Service Uaee: (a) Shopping Cents re Of lase than 25,000 square feet. The parking required will be the sum of parking requi reaients for the individual uses. (b) Shopping Centers of vrore than 25,000 aqua re Feet and la sa than 7,000,000 square feet of gross leasable area: (1) Shopping Carte rs of leas than 600,000 square feet, but more than 25,000 square feet of gross leasable area: Five parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area shall be prowlde d. For centers which were built or approved prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, a parking ratio of four and one half parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area shall be provided. (2) Shopping Centers of 600,000 to 1,000,000 square feet of gross leasable area; Five and one half parking spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross leasable area shall be provided. (3) In addition to the above parking requirements, the following special parking provisions shall apply: (i) Food Service (defined ae restaurants, fa at food restaurants, rave rne, lounges and other eatebliahnienta for the as le and consumption on the premises of food and have rages): if over 15 percent of the gross le aseble area is occupied by food service uee e, one addltionnl apace per 100 square feet of the gross leasable area used for food se rvice shall be provided. 132 CITY COUNCIL OFD INANCE N0. OCA 92-01 - CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA March 3, 1993 Pa 9e 2 (ii) Cinemas occupying up to 10 percent of the gross leasable area in shopoinq centers of less than 700,000 square feet: Three additional parking spaces for every 700 theater seats shall be provided. (iii) Cinemas in shopping centers of 100,000 to 200,000 square feet: No additional parking spaces shall be required for the first 450 theater seats; three additional parking spaces for every 100 seats over q50 shall be provided. (iv) Cinemas in shopping cents ra of over 200,000 square feet of gross leasable area: No additional parking spaces shall ]x• required for [he first 750 theater seats; three additional parking spaces for every 700 theater seats over 750 shall 1R provided. (v) Offices (including medical and dental): Sf over 10 percent of the gross leasable area is occupied by office use, a spa vial parking study prepared in accordance with City standards, as speci Eied by the City planner, shall be prepared by the applicant at the applicant's expense. Parking requirements for the office use shall Ue established based on the City planner's review and approval of said special parking study. (c) shopping Center of over 1,000,000 square feet of gross leasable area: A special parking study prepared in accordance with City stands rde, as specified by the City Planner, shall be prepared by the applicant at the applicant's expense. parking requi remsnta for the shopping center aha 11 6e established based on the City Planner's review and approval of said special parking study. The above requirements will apply for all commercial centers in the City; however, for uses not located within a shopping rents r, or when deemed necessary by the City planner to calculate uses independently, the following standards shall apply: (d) Automobile wa shiny and cleaning establishments, except self- service: sixteen parking stalls. (e) Se lE-service automobile washes: Txo and one half spaces for each washlny stall. ff) Automobile service and gag station: Three spaces, plus two spaces Eor each service bay. (g) Herber shops or beauty pa rlorse Two spaces Eor each barber chair; three spaces for each beautician station. 1° CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. OCA 92-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.: MaYCh 3, 1993 Page 3 ~h) Buildings used solely for coin-operated Laundromats or dry cleaning establishments: one space far each three washing machines. (i) Offices, comma zcial banks, savings and loan offices, other £inan cial institutions, general retail stores, food stores, supermarkets, and drug stores Ove space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area. (j) Contractor's storage yards Sn connection with contractoc's business; sa lva 9e yard; junk yard, automobile wre ckir.g yard; storage yard: Six spaces separated from the enclose storage area. (k) Lumber yards: One space for each 300 square feet of gross floor area for retail sales, plus one apace for each 1,000 square feat of open area devoted to display (partially covered, by roof, awning, etc.) or sales. (1) Mor':ua zits and funeral homes: One space for every 25 aqua re foot. or fraction thereof of assembly roam or floor area. (m) Motels and hotels: One space for each gut at unit and two spaces for resident manager or owner. (n) Motor vehicle sales and automotive repair, painting, body work or se twice: One space per 400 square feet of gross floor area. (o) Stores solely fOr the sale of furniture and appliances: One space for each 500 square feet of gross floor area. (p) Trade schools, business colleges, and commercial schools: One space Eor each three student rapacity of each classroom plus one space for each faculty member or employee. SECTION 2: This Council finds that this amendment will not adversely affect the environment and hereby issues a Ne gatSVe Declaration. 9ECTION 3: the City Council dec?ayes that, should any provlslon, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared Lnva lid by any final court action in a Court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive le gislatl on, the remaining provislone, se ctione, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance sha 11 remain Ln full force and effect. SECTION 4: The Clty Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and sha 11 cause the sane to be puhli shed within 15 days after its pas9age at least once in the Inland Valley wily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in tha City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City or Rancho Cucamonga, California. 134 CITS' OF RANCHO Cl`CAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Mazch 3, 1993 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF UTILITY USER'S TAX PROPOSAL BA K D The City of Rancho Cucamonga has had the fiscal strength and leadership to withstand periodic financial shortfatls. It is essentially because of these unforeseen circumstances that cities maintain reserves. Sound fiscal management in both the private and public sectors requires the ability to withstand economic swings to ensure long term survival. Under normai conditions Rancho Cucamonga could have weathered the current economic climate, bvt not the continued taking away of local revenues by the State. Over the past three years, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has had a number of tax revenues taken away or cut by action of the State of California as it continues to use local revenue to fund State programs. The most significant revenues taken away have been to the City's tnost essential of revenues, the General Fund, where all general City operations are funded. Such reductions in the face of a declining economy have reached a critical point with the City. Existing Permanent Revenue losses: Amount 1. Property Taxes g 250,000 2. Property Tax Administration (County) 125,710 3. State Subventions lost via census 800,0(10 4. Trailer Coach Fees 13,000 5. Booking Fees (County) 635,290 6. Fine and Forfeitures 200,00() 7. Cigarette Tax 192,000 Redevelopment Agency losses: 8. Redevelopment Funds $3.7 million Total 1~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF UTILITY USER' S TAX PROPOSAL March 3, 1993 Page 2 While the loss of funds by the Redevelopment Agency is not a direct loss to City operations, it does remove the one economic development tool that exists within the State of California for the purpose of creating jobs and promoting new industry, housing, commercial development and, under certain conditions, capital improvements, in cities throughout the State. In an effort to meet the overall impact caused by prior States actions, the City has made substantial reductions in its operations. Since the 1990/91 fiscal yeaz, the City's expenditures have decreased $3.1 million, nearly 11%. These reductions have resulted in three years of service reductions, three years of continued down sizing and reorganizing, and a 22% reduction in the actual work force, one which was already modest for a city of Rancho Cucamonga's size. Also, employees have not received a cost of living increase for two years, nor any merit adjustments during the past year. Efforts will continue to reduce staffing and curtail expenses in view of the State's cwrent and anticipated actions. On January 8th, the proposed budget for the State of California was presented. In an effort to balance the proposed budget, the Governor has recommended a reduction of $2.6 billion to local government. This is an effort to fill an estimated $8 billion shortfall that is projected by the end of the fiscal year. The proposed cuts will eliminate the last of the revenue replacement funds (ABS), the State provided following the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978. These cuts follow on the heels of a $1.3 billion reduction to local government last September. The potential additional loss to the City of Rancho Cucamonga is $800,000, or 34%, of City General Fund property tax dollars. This loss of property taxes is from an already limited source of dollars to the City; as a ]ow property tax City (one of 38 in the State), Rancho Cucamonga only receives four (4) cents for every property tax dollar paid by property owners in the City. The slate vide average is ]8 cents. The potential loss to the Fire District is $2.5 million, or 49%, of its general operating revenues, and the projected loss to the Redevelopment Agency is nearly $7 million. This $10.3 million loss would be on top of all the cuts and reductions already absorbed by the City. Once again, the State is determined to take away local funding, and in so doing has placed the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the position, for the first time, of not being able to make up the projected losses Projected Loss Summary City Property Tax $ 800,000 Fire District Augmentation (Property Tax) 2500,000 Redevelopment Agency 7,000,000 TOTAL $10,500,000 1~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF L'TTLITY USER' S TAX PROPOSAL March 3, 1993 Page 3 The Governor of the State, as well as the Assembly Speaker, have continued to recommend that local government needs to become less dependent upon the State and more self-sufficient financially. After the State has cut funding to cities, the State can easily act in such a charitable fashion. The City must, nevertheless, act decisively and quickly to ensure fiscal stability. Service levels for the residents of Rancho Cucamonga must be determined locally, and the revenues to pay for such services must begin to be supported locally--beyond the State's ability to control. It should be noted that the City does not intend to seek replacement revenues for the Redevelopment Agenc}is loss, as these revenues, although important to economical development and capita] programs, are not operational revenues. As significant as the loss is, Rancho Cucamonga can survive despite the Agency's $7 million loss. The same can not be said of the remaining General Fund loss. LOCAL OBIECTIVES The primary objective of any locally developed program is to ensure the continuation of public safety servirns, Police and Fire. The City can not allow a $2.5 million loss to the Fire Protection District. Such an event would be devastating to the Fire protection services; it would translate into the loss of one truck company, two engine companies, and the funding equivalent of 33 fire personnel. It would also require the effective closure of two of the City's five fire stations. Such a reduction would have catastrophic affects on fire protection services for the City, and would adversely impact insurance rates for business and industry which would escalate under the Insurance Services Office (ISO) rating systern. Additionally, response time would nearly double from five to approximately ten minutes, depending on station and incident location. The City's Police contract with the County of San Bernardino has not had an increase in sworn field personnel in over five years, this, despite the fact that the City has increased in population as well as business and industry. In the face of continued demand for services, and the need to combat graffiti and gang activity, the City must not allow degradation of its law enforcement services. While no additions have been made to the law enforcement contract, the service costs continue to increase based on the Consumer Price Index even when no new personnel are added. The estimated $A00,000 loss of properly tax would cause erosion of an already thin blue line. Two key services that have long been supported within the City, but have not been provided as a City service, are Library Services and Animal Control. The City's Animal Control shelter is nearly complete, however, staffing and operational costs weuld prohibit its daily operation in the face of khe State's budget posture. Locally developed revenues could sustain the operations of the new animal shelter, a service residents have wanted locally. 137 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF UTILITY USER' S TAX PROPOSAL March 3, 1993 Page 4 Similarly, a historic trend has been evident concerning the desire for the operation of library services by the City. The existing 10,000 square foot library is grossly inadequate for a City of 115,000 residents and has been a source of contention ever since incorporation. Citizens have demanded local control and enhanced services. The City faces a challenge in this uncertain time if it is to seize an opportunity offered by the County of San Bernardino. The County has publicly announced its intent to negotiate the transfer of Rancho Cucamonga library services from the County to the City. Any such transition would have to be done carefully, but the Ciry may have the opportunity to provide loca,'!y controlled library services, possibly at a much needed enhanced level if local revenues can be developed. LOCAL REVENUE OPPORTUNITY Given the realities of the State budget and the dilemma thrust upon the City, there is the need to seek locally supported revenue to continue to provide the levels of service, especially in public safety, that the community demands. A local revenue source must be developed, one independent or the State. Under existing law there are three major sources of new revenue available to cities: sales tax, property tax overrides (assessments) and utility user's tax. A sales tax, as well as a property tax assessment have the unfortunate susceptibility of State withholding or re-distribution--just as has occurred the last two years. The remaining revenue option is a utility tax. This option has the benefit of being locally adopted and controlled and is being regarded statewide as a vehicle to move away from State involvement. Nearly one-quarter of the cities in the State have such a tax (6.4% average) and marc+ more are considering its adoption. The enactment of a Utility User's Tax at this time will enable the City to continue, uninterrupted, public safety services. While the State has not adopted its budget, and probably will not until this summer, the City has an obligation to ensure fiscal and service continuity. Waiting until enactment of the State budget could result in disruption of essential services which could lead to the lay-off of safety personnel and deterioration of services. These possibilities combined with the added cost of rehiring these staff after revenues have been established is contrary to sound fiscal management and would be at the expense of the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. UTILITY USER'S TAXORDINAN A Utility User's Tax is a tax imposed as a percentage of utility charges made for the use of gas, electricity, telephone, and water. For example, iE the combined utility costs for a resident were $ISO per month, and the tax was 5%, the total tax would be $7.50 per month. 1~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF UTILITY USER' S TAX PROPOSAL March 3, 1993 Page 5 Special provisions of the Utility User's Tax Ordinance include a ]ow income exemption. Interstate and international telephone calls aze not subject to the tax, these aze calls typically made through Sprint, MCI or other long distance calling companies. The tax will apply only to the base utility chazges. The enactment of a utility tax requires that each respective utility be provided at least 90 days notice to put the billing into affect. And since billing is done retroactively based on utility use, first receipts for the City would be at least four to five months from the date of enactment of the ordinance. CONCLUSION The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not sat idly by during the last three years while the State has taken away revenues and the economy has grown weak. The approach has been on two levels: first, to fight the budget reductions at the legislative level; and secondly, and more critically, the City has cut its expenditures dramatically while bolstering the budget with one time replacement of funds from other remaining revenue sources. These replacement opportunities have al] vanished. The additional revenue cuts proposed by the State will now compress the City budget to the point of creating irreparable damage to services--most importantly, public safety. $ECOMMENDATiON It is recommended that the City Council conduct a Public Hearing to receive public testimony regarding the adoption of a proposed Utility User's Tax and provides staff with appropriate direction. Re c idly s 'red, 1 Robert Dominguez Administrative Services Director RD/dah attachment 139 RANCHO CUCAMONGA SERVICE LEVEL OPTIONS Utility Tax' Ootrans Cost Eattmatgg • Replacement of one time revenues used to $1.7 million support City operations after State take-sways. • Replacement of prospective City loss of property $900000 taxes via proposed State budget. • Replacement of funds to sustain Fire Protection Services at its current level based on prospective $2.5 million loss of property taxes via proposed State budget. • Provide enhanced level of Police protection by $650,000 fielding a Crime Suppression Team aimed at gangs, graffiti, auto theft and crimes against persons. • Assumption of Library services from the County. $775,000 to $2.5 million Opportunities can vary from utilization of exist- ing faclity to the use of an interim location between 20,000 and 40,000 sq. Et. • Provide operation of the new Animal Sheiter to ~r~ 000 improve local responsiveness while providing a close, accessible shelter facility. 'For each one percent of utility tax, approximately $1 million in revenue is created. 1~ .~_.... ~RqF ORDINANCE N0. r AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 3 OF THE RANCHO CUC AMDNGA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 3.48 PERTAINING TO THE EGTA8LI8HMENT OF UTILITY b'SE R'S FEES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: Section 1. Title 3 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding a new Chapter 3.48 to be read, in words and figures, as follows: 3.48.010 Title. This Chapter shall he known as the Utility User's Fee of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 3.48.020 Definitions. The following words and phrases, whenever used in this Chapter, shall be construed as follows: A. "Person" shall mean any domestic or foreign corporation, firm, association, syndi as te, joint stock company, partnership of any kind, joint venture, club, trust, society, or individuals. 8. "City" shall mean the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. "Gas" shall mean natural or manufactured gas or any alternate 141 hydrocarbon fuel which may be substituted therefor. D. "Telephone Corporation," "Electrical Corporation," "Gas Corporation," and "Water Lorpo ration ," shall have the same mea pings as defined in Sections 234, 218, 222, and 241, respectively, of the California Public Utilities Cade except, "Electrical Corporation," "Gas Corporation," and "Water Corporation" shall also be construed to include any municipality, public agency, or person engaged in the selling or supplying of electrical power or gas or water to a service user. E. "finance Director" shall mean the Director of Administrative Services, or his or her designee, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, F, "Service Supplier" shall mean any entity required to collect or self-impose and remit a fee as imposed by this Chapter. G. "Se rv ir.e User" shall mean person required to pay a fee imposed by this Chapter. R, "Month" shall mean a calendar month. 1, "Non-utility Supplier" shall mean: (a) a service supplier, other than an electrical corporation serving within the City, which generates electrical energy in capacities of at least 50 kilowatts for its own use or for sale to others; or (b) a gas supplier other than a gas corporation, that sells or supplies gas to users within Lhe City. 142 3.48.030 Exemptions. Nothing in this Chapter shall he construed as imposing a fee upon any person when imposition of such fee upon that person would be in violation of California statute, the Constitution of the State of California, or the Constitution of the United States. A. 1, The fee imposed by this chapter shall not apply ±o any person that uses electric ,gas, water or telephone services in or upon any residence occupied by such individual when the combined total income (as used for purposes of the California personal income tax law) of all members of t'ne household in which such individual resided was less than twelve thousand five hundred dollars for the calendar year prior to the fiscal year (July 1st through Jun^ 30th) for which an application for exemption as provided in this chapter is sought. 2. The exemption granted by this section shall not eliminate the duty of the service supplier from collecting fees from such exempt individuals or the duty of such exempt individuals from paying such fees to the service supplier unless an exemption is applied for by the se rv ire user and granted in accordance with the provisions of subsection B of this section. B. 1. Any service user exempt from the fees imposed by this Chapter De cause of the provisions of subsection A of this section may file an application with the Finance Director for an exemption. Such applications shall he_ made upon forms su,npl ied by the Finance Director and shall recite facts under oath which qualify the applicant for an exemption. The finance Director shall review all such applications and certify as exempt those applicants determined to qualify therefor, and shall notify all service suppliers affected that such exemption has been approved, stating the name of the applicant, the address to whi rh such exempt service is being supplied, the 1~ account number, if any, and such other information as may De necessary for the service supplier to remcve the exempt service user from its fee billing procedure. Upon receipt of such notice, the service supplier shall not be required to continue to bill any further fee imposed by this chapter from such exempt service user until further notice by the Finance Director is given. The service supplier shall eliminate such exempt service user from its fee billing precedu re no later than sixty days after receipt of such notice from the Finance Director. 2. All exemptions shall continue and be renewed automatically by the Finance Director so long as the requisite facts supporting the initial qualification for exemption shall continue; provided, however, that the exemption shall automatically terminate with any change in the service address or residence of the exempt individual; further provided such individual may, nevertheless, apply for a new exemption with each change of address or residence. .3. Any individual exempt from the tax shall notify the Finance Director within ten days of any change in fact or circumstance which might disqualify such individual from receiving such exemption, It shall De a misdemeanor for any person to knowingly receive the Gene fits of Lhe exemptions provided by this section when the Dasis for such exemption either does not exist or ceases t0 e%15t. C. Notwithstanding any of the provisions of this section, however, any service supplier who determines by any means that a new or non-e rempt service user is receiving service through a meter or connection exempt by virtue of an 1~ exemption issued to z previous user or exempt user of the same meter or connection, such service supplier shall notify the Finance Director of such fact and the Finance Director shall conduct ar. rove stigation to ascertain whether or not the provisions of this section have been complied with, and, where approprizte, order the service supplier to romme nee collecting the fee from the non-exempt service user. 3_4II.040 Telephone user's fee. A. There is hereby imposed a fee on the amounts paid for any intrastate te~ephone services by every person in the City using such services. The fee imposed by this Section shall he at the rate of percent of the charges made for such services, and shall be paid by the person paying for such services. B, As used in this Section, the term "charges" shall not include charges for se rv fires paid for by inserting coins in coin-operated telephones, except that where such coin-operated service is furnished for a guaranteed amount, the amounts paid under such guarantee, plus any fixed monthly or other periodic charge, shall De included in the base for computing the amount of fee due; nor shall the term "charges" include charges for any type of service or equipment furnished by a service supplier subject to Public Utilities Commission regulations during any period in which the same or similar services or equipment are also avails Cle for sale or lease from persons other than a se wire supplier subject to Public utilities Commission regulations; nor shall the words "telephone communi r.a tion services" include land mobile service or maritime mobile servi res as defined in Section 2.1 of Title 47 of the Code bf Gede ral Regulations, as said Section existed on January 1, 1910. The term "telephone r.ommunicztion services" refers to that service which provides 1~ access to a telephone system and the privilege of telephone quality communication with substantially all persons having telephone stations which are part of such telephone system. The Telephone user's fee is intended to, and does, apply to all charges billed to a telephone account having a si tus in the City, irrespective of whether a particular communication originates and/or terminates within the City. C. The fee imposed by this Section shall be collected from the service user by the person pro vid',ng the intrastate telephone communication services, or the person receiving payment for such services. The amount of the fee collected in one month shall be remitted to the Finance Director on or before the last day of the following month; or at the option of the person required to rol lect and remit the fee, an estimated amount of fee collected, measured Cy the fee hill in the previous month, shall be remitted to the Finance Director on nr hefo re the last day of each month. D. No thwi th ita nd inq the provision of Subsection (a), the fee imposed under this Section shall not he imposed upon any person for using intrastate, interstate, and international telephone communication services to the extent that the amounts paid for such services are exempt from or not subject to the tax imposed under Division 2, Part 20, or the California Revenue and 'fa xation Code, or Lhe tax imposed under Section 425! of Lhe Internal Revenue Code. 3.48.050 Electr is itv user's fee. A. There is hereby imposed a fee upon every person other than an elec trir. or gas corporation, using electrical energy in the City. The fee imposed by this Section shall be at Lhe rate of __ pe rcnnt of the charges made for such energy by an electrical 146 corporation providing service ir. the City and shall he billed to and paid by the person using the er.e rgy, The fee applicable to electrical energy provided by a non-utility supplier shall be determined by applying the fee rate *.o the e.qu h•alent charge the service user would have incurred if the energy used had been provided by the electrical coroo ration franchised by the City. Non- utility suppliers shall install, maintain, and use an appropriate utility-type metering system which will enable compliance with this Section. "Charges," as used ,n this Section, sha`1 include charges made for: (1) metered energy and (2) minimum charges fur service, including customer charges, service charges, demand charges, standby charges, and all other annual and monthly charges, fuel or other cost adjustments authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission or the Federal Energy Re gala tnry Commission. B. Rs used in this Section, the to rrn "using electrical energy" shall not be construed to mean the storage of such energy by a person in a battery owned or possessed Dy him for use in an automobile or other machinery device apart from the premises upon which the energy was received, provided, however, that the term shall ir,c Jude the receiving of such energy for the purpose of using it in the charging of batteries; nor shall the term include electricity used and consumed by an electric utility supplier in the conduct of its business; nor shall the term include the mere re ce iviny of such energy by an electric corporation or governmental agency at a point within Lhe City of Rancho Cucamonga for resale; nor shall the term include the use of such energy in the production or distribu lien on water by a water utility or a governmental d QP,nCy. C. The fee imposed in this Section shall be collected from the service 147 user by the service supplier or non-utility supplier. The tax imposed in this Section on use supplied by self-generation or from a non-utility supplier not subject tc the .jurisdiction of this Chapter, shall be collected and remitted to the Finance Oirec for in the manner set forth in Section 3.48.080. The amount of fee collected by a service supplier or a non-utility supplier in one month shall be remitted by United States mail to the finance Oirecto r, postmarked on or before the last day of the following month, or at the option of the person required to collect and remit the fee, an estimated amount of fee measured by the fee billed in the previous month, shall be remitted Dy United States mail to the Finance Oire cto r, postmarked on or he fo re the last day of each month. 3,48.0552 Tax on con genera ted electricity. A. Not withstanding the rate provisions ir. Section 5 of this ordinance, the fee imposed on every person using co genera ted electrical energy in the City shall pe at the rate of percent (_%) of the value of the co ge nera ted electrical energy consumed in the City. Coge ne ra ted electricity shall he valued at the electric utility supplier's combined "Avoided Cost Energy Pricing and Avoided Cost Capacity Pricing" whi r,h is filed with the California Public Utilities Commission. B, The cogenerator shall install and maintain an appropriate metering system which will enable compliance wi*.h this seetion. C,. The fee shall he collected and paid by the cogenerator under ser,tion 3.48.065 if the cogenerator consumes the energy. If the conge ne rafor sells the energy for consumption in Lhe City, the fee will be imposed on the charges 1~8 made for such service and shall be collected and paid by the person to whom the energy is so id. 3,48.O6C. Gas user's fee. R. There is hereby imposed a fee upon every person in the Lity, other than a gas corporation or electrical corporation, using, in the City, gas which is transported through mains or pipes or by mobile transport. The fee imposed by this Section shall be at the rate of pe relent of the charges made for the gas and shall be billed to and paid by the person usinn the gas. The fee applicable to gas or gas transportation provided by non-utility suppliers shall be determined by applying the fee rate to the equivalent charges the service user wculd have incurred if the gas or gas transportation had been provided by the gas corporation fre nchised by the City. "Cho rge s" as used in this Section, shall include: (1) that billed for gas which is delivered through mains or pipes; (2) gas transportation charges; and !3) demand charges, services charges, customer charges, minimum charges, annual and monthly charges, and any other authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission or the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. B. The fee otherwise imposed by this Section is not applicable to: (1) r.harges made for gas which is to be resold and delivered through mains and pipes; (7.) charges made for gas used and consumed Dy a public utility or gove rranen tal agency in the conduct of its business; or (3) charges made by a gas public utility or gas used and consumed in the course of its public utility business; and (4) charges made far gas used in the propulsion of a motor vehicle, xs authorized in the Vehicle Code of the State of California. 149 C. The fee imposed in this Section shall be collected from the service user by the person selling or transporting the gas. A person selling only transoo rta Lion services to a service user for delivery of gas through mains or pipes shall collect the fee from the service user ha sed on the transportation charges. The person selling or transoo rting the gas shall, on or before the 20th day of each calendar month, commencing on the 20th day of the calendar month after the effective date of this Chapter, make a report to the Finance Director stating the amount of fees billed during the preceding calendar month. At the time such reports are filed, the person selling or transporting the gas shall remit fee payments to the Finance Director in accordance with schedules established or approved by the Finance Director. T~;e fee imposed in this Section on use supplied Dy self-production or a non-utility supplier not subject to the jurisdiction of this Ordinance, shall be collected and remitted to the Finance Director in the manner set forth in Section 3.48.D8O. 3.48.065 Service users receivinn direct ourchasino of gas electricity or to leohone service. A. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Ordinance, a service user receiving gas, electricity, or telephone service directly from a non-utility supplier not under the jurisdiction of this Crd finance, or otherwise not having the full fee due on the use of gas, electricity, or telephone service in the City directly billed and collected by Lhe se rvi re supplied, shall report said fact to the Finance Director within 30 days of said use and shall directly remit to the City the amount of fee due. 8. The Finance Director may require said service user to provide, subject to audit, filed tax returns or other satisfactory evidence documenting 150 the quantity of gas, electricity, or telephone service used and the price thereof. 3.48.070 Water user's tax. A. There is hereby imposed a fee upmi every person in the City using water which is delivered through mains or pipes. The fee imposed by this Section shall De at the rate of percent of the charges made for such water and shall be paid by the person paying for such water. B. There shill be excluded from the base on which the fee imposed in this Section is computed, charges made for water which is to be resold and delivered through mains or pipes; and charges made by a municipal water department, public utility, or a city or municipal water district for water used and consumed by such department, utility, or district. L. The fee imposed in this Section shall be collected from the service user py the pe rsen supplying the water. The amount collected in one month shall be remitted to the Finance Director on or before the last day of the following month. 3.48,075 Fxemntion for ene rav produced by fuel cells Notwithstanding any other provision of this ordinance, no tax shall be imposed on the use of er,e rgy produced through the use of fuel cell technology. 3,48.080. Fee hill ino and pa vment. The duty to collect and remit the fees imposed by this chapter shall be performed as follows: 151 A, The fee shall be collected, insofar as practicable, at the same time as, and along with, the charges made in accordance with the regular billing practices of the service supplier. 6, The duty to collect fees from a service user shall commence with the beginning of the first full regular billing period applicable to the service user where all charges normally included in such regular billing are subject to the provisions of this chapter. C. 'rlhe re a person receives more than one billing, one or more being for different periods than another, the duty to collect shall arise separately for each billing period, .3.48.050. Delinquent payments--interest and penalty. A. Fees collected from a service user which are not remitted to the Finance Director on or before the due dates provided in this chapter are delinquent, 6. Penalties for delinquency in remittance of the fee collected, or any deficiency determination, shall attach and be paid Dy the person required to collect and remit at the rate of fifteen percent of the total fee collected or imposed by the chapter. C. The Finance Director shall have power to impose additional penalties upon persons required to collect and remit fees under the provisions of Lhis chapter for fraud or negligence in reporting or remitting at [he rate of fifteen percent of the amount of the fee collected or as recomputed by the Finance Director. 152 C. Every penalty imposed under the provisions of this chapter shall became a part of the fee required to De remitted. 53.48.100. Fee deemed debt to city--collection. Any fee required to De paid by a service user under the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed a debt owed by the service user to the City. Any such fee collected from a service user which has willfully been withheld from the Finance Director shall be deemed a debt owed to the City by the person required to collect and remit. Any person owing money to the City under the provisions of this chapter shall be tiaD le to an action brought in the name of the City for the recovery of such amount. 3.M18.110. Adminis oration and enforcement--finance director autho rity A, the Finance Director shall have the power and duty, and is hereby directed, to enforce each and all of the provisions of this Chapter. B. The Finance Director shall have the power to adopt rules and regulations not inconsistent with provisions of this Chapter for the purpose of carrying out and enforcing the payment, collection, and remittance of the fees herein imposed. C. The Finance Director may make administrative agreements to vary the requirements of this Chapter so that collection of any fee imposed here may be made in cor, fo rma nee with the billing procedures of the particular service supplier so long as said agreements result in collection of the fee in conformance with the general purpose and scope of this Chaote r. 153 0. The Finance Director shall determine the eligibility of any person who asserts a right to exemption from the fee imposed by this Chapter. The Finance Director shall provide the ;erv ice supplier with the name of any person who the Finance Director determines is exempt from the fee imposed hereby, together with the address and account number to which service is supplied to any such exempt person. The Finance Director shall notify the service su pp~ier of termination of any person's right to exemption hereunder, or the change of any address to which service is supplied to any exempt person. E. The Finance Director shall provide notice to all service suppliers at least 40 days prior to any annexation or other change in the City's boundaries. Said notice shall set forth the revised boundaries by street and address along with a copy of the final annexation order from LAF CO. 3.48.120. Failure to remit--assessment and administrative remedies A. The Finance Director may make an assessment for fees not remitted by a person required to remit. B, Whenever the Finance Director determines Lhat a service user has deliberately withheld the amount of the fee owed by him from the amounts remitted to the service su pPlier who is required to Collect the fee, or that a service user has ra fu sed to pay the amount of fee to such person, or whenever the Finance Director deems it in the best interest of the City, he or she may relieve such person of the obligation to collect fees due under this chapter from certain named service users for spetifieA billing periods, 1~ C. The service su FPlier shall provide the City with amounts refused, along with the names, addresses, and reasons of the service users refusing to pay the fee imposed under provision of this chapt_r. Whenever the service user has failed to pay the amount of fee fora period of two or more billing periods, the service supplier shall be relieved of the obligation to collect fees due. D. The Finance Director shall notify the service user that he has assumed responsibility to collect the fees due for the stated periods and demand payment of such fees. the notice shall be served on the service user by handing it to him personally or by deport of the noticz in the United States mail, postage prepaid thereon, addressed to the service user at the address to which billing was made oy the person required to collect the fee; or, should the service user have changed his address, to his last known address. If a service user fails to remit the fee to the Finance Director within fifteen days from the date of the service of the notice upon him, which shall be th,e date of mailing if service is not accomplished in person, a penalty of twenty-five percent of Lhe amount of the fee set forth in the noti re shall be imposed, but not less than five dollars. The penalty shall become part of Lhe fee herein required to he paid. 3.48.13D, Reco rd keeping requirements. it shall he the duty of every person required to collect and remit to the City any fee imposed by this chapter to keep and preserve, for a period of three years, all records as may he necessary to determine the amount of such fee as he may have he en liable for the collection of and remittance to the finance Director, which records 1~ the Finance Director shall have the right to inspect at all reasonable times. 3.48.140. .Refunds authorized when--arocedu res A. Whenever the amount of any fee has been overpaid or paid more than once, or has been erroneously or illegal l,y collected or received by the City under this chapter it may De refunded as provided in subsections 6 and C of this section, provided a claim in writing, therefor, stating under penalty of perjury the specific grounds upon which the claim is founded, is filed with the Finance Director within one year of the date of payment. The claim shall be on forms furnished by the Finance Director, B. A service supplier may claim a refund or take as credit against fees collected and remitted an amount overpaid, paid more Lhan once or erroneously or illegally collected or received, when it is established that the person from whom the fee has been toll ec ted did not owe the fee. C. Any service user may obtain a refund of fees overpaid, or paid more than once, or erroneously or illegally collected or received by the City, by filing a claim in the manner provided in subsection A of this section, but only when the service user having paid the fee to the service supplier establishes to the satisfaction of the Finance Director that Lhe service user has been unable to obtain a refund from the service supplier who collected the fee. D. Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, whenever a service supplier, pursuant to an order of the California public Utilities Commission or a court of competent ,jurisdiction, makes a refund to service users of 156 charges for past utility services, the fees paid pursuant to this chapter on the amount of such refunded charges shall also be refunded to service users, and the service supplier shall be entitled to claim a credit for such refunded fees against the amount of fee which is due upon the next monthly returns. In the event this chapter is repealed, the amounts of any refundable fees will be borne by the City. Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section. The fee imposed under this Ordinance shall apply to Dills rendered on or after Section 3. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase cf this Ordinance or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such der.i Sion shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council he retry declares that it would have passed each section, suhsec Lion, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or mare section, suhsection, suhdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrases he declared unconstitutional. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause the same to be pu Dlished within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 157 i Y OF gANCHO CUCAMONGq crncLERx March 2, 1993 Mayor Dennis Stout, and City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga Dear Mayor and Council; MAR 0 3 1°93 CGS ~CFC IS ~-rU/rl ~ ~Yp~vez ~~~ ~~ti ,,o!9I 1D113'l2'1231d 1516 Before you act on the concept of an utility tax, there are some thoughts which !wish to convey, and points I ask you to consider. Everyone is already aware of the impact on local residents from the recession, the recent Edison and other utility rate increase requests, the federal concept of a sales tax, the federal proposal for increased gasoline taxes, federal proposal for an energy tax, the State's budget woes placed on local governments, and our continuing economy recession. ` The City of Rancho Cucamonga has in the past imposed a tax on residents for park assessment without their consent or approval. " Council should be concerned with the media's coverage and the comment ,"I really don't care what the political consequences are. We have to do it." is absurd if council acts on every whim without concern and public input. ` The City Manager made the comment that ,"there seems to be no other alternative", yet as a member of the community I would ask what cuts have been made, how the current level of service was a«ived at and what makes further reductions impossible, who determined that the level of service without an utility tax was unacceptable, where was the public input or hearings to determine what level of service is acceptable and what we the public are willing to pay for? What affect will the State's budget have on the City, and should the State balance their budget without affecting local government, or at a lower impact to local governments than anticipated, what will be the need for an utility tax, or will it be reduced or eliminated? Can the proposed utility tax be increased or decreased, and how or under what conditions% ~~-~~ Peter Bryan 9466 Hillside Rd. Alta Loma, Ca. 91737 ,~-i1N~S .', Q,CSfiDpO Mayo~i~ity councll Members. ~>~y-x,395 I have a prepared statement I'd ]ike to read. I~sta ' mysolf; I have-a I-wockad in the aen'prafit sector-[or-t fyegs,-t-wes ktu~.~sst-Tfeasnrer far th8'CIAr23PratftCb}ieges.uatif Januar of jg9.0,s+duss-Leek oveeas President & CEO of a small corporation. I am nn stranger wt,en jt.eomes tz.~e[orkiAg with numbers -dnd-I-hay~ leazned enoughto K2-51(a8eiq; used; end presented in many ways--in some_cases tYie same naxtbers <an be useA Labolster As-Themas-F all-it- wants-isthe-liberty of appearing°:--t-wout ma e a a First of all, I am greatly concerned that the City's Staff has failed to compile information regarding future budget projections, beyond the 1992193 budget year. As I understand it this Utility Tax wlll not be a one year affair. It would continue W exist, at least into the near future. Yet, City Staff has declined W present us with any kind of projections regarding future revenues, expenditures, or resulting shorUalts! As a result, we have no yardstick with which to assess the future needs of the City. (Ala we sewed to take Staff's word th~,tw~g are~,oln~~'`~` Pfuture shortfalls? And while projections ere, at best;''" ~' 4' lieve it is important that the City present its financial needs in~quantifiable manner. R After having spent many hours reviewing the City's budgets {bets-prieryenr- xtaals a i would like to take issue with a number of references made in ths~16 "Staff Report" dated March 3, 1993. 1. The report states that "since 1990/91...expenditures have decreased 3 I million, nearly 1 t $" 'This claim does not seem to be supported by the actual budget numbers from 89190 to 90/9 t actual expenditures INCREASED by 52.6 m:lhon,or 11~, from 90/91 to 91/92 actuat expenditures do DECREASE by t L9 million, or 7~, however, from 91 /92 to 92/93 expenditures are projected tv INCREASE again by 2455,000, or 3~! ~ ~~ In a,e 6 year! nding wltil me protected Budget year of 92193 '. r . ~At ~ iN D _ exppenditures INCREASE iri eii 'Gut Gne Uf those years--grow'ui ifi expenditures in that 6 yeaz period amounts to 5 t R--that's an average increase in expenditures of ;S.SR per year! And while, as near as I can tell, the City has managed W reduce its Salary & Benefits expenditures over the last three year Et~staQab' artt~~Q3} it does not appear ~ those savings have resulted in decreased overall expenditures! In other words--those savings are not being passed on to us, the taxpayer! ?. In fact, the largest growing Department in this City is that of the General Government. twblch includes the City Manager's Office). Over the 6 year period ending 6/30/93 this Dept will have grown by 57R-- or 9.5R per year! While Public Safety (which includes Police & Fire Protection) has grown bq only 34R--or 5.6R per year! So when City Staff claim that. this Utility lax is needed to maintain essential city services--and most importantly, public safety--lit ,ir ~ 1CIIgF, it makes me wonder!? if, as the Staff Report states in this memo, the~,.prsmazy objective.,;~s to insure the continuation o[ public safety services, Police and Fite"; then Why does the General Gov't Dept. continue to consume ever increasing portions of this City's Budget? tuHltliag:~ a Atti Surely f~ wouldn't use Police & Fire Protection as a tear tactic to get us to go along wtth this tax proposal? Would they? Well, the Staft Report does state that waiting too long before enacting this fax could "lead to the Lay-Oft of safety personnel and deterioration of services") It makes no mention of other depazt- mental lay-offs irlMe.foMe It would seem fA ma that maybe safety personnel aren't the owes who should be laid-off first in a budget crisis? ~ ~ - i also dispute the Report's claim that we are in desperate need ut "Cwo key services that have long been supported within the City"; those being the Library and Animat Control! Since when has the Library & Animal Control been tey to the operation of this City? I have not heard the resident masses clamoring to assume financial respcrosibility of the Library, nor was I aware that we are woefully deficient in the Animal Control area? VFken--tint~uu o i yCRieesiysa{~..ye c}isconttn'ueti'Sf~~e-Cityditi-aet-asseme-respon . .. -- tJo~tId2atnraae~o mai>rtairrttcem. i HCSE `-r11 VIC GS Wllf. A1~}-r Pi/ LOS` TF i~,f '~("%;1:i1 i~J"( Mip 7HTm-; Te~-ro So, if we are in a crisis, then let us concentrate on that crisis, and Iet's TT= e~~xF- not be moved into unrelated side issues that only serve to muddy the waters. 4. t ",-Let's remember that what the Staff Report euphemisriglty calls a "Local Revenue Opportunity ~ is not as opportunity for us plain folks. It would appeaz, however; to be a tremendous opportunity for this City to reac deep into our")wand pull out an economic plum! This "Revenue Opportunity" is simply a tax on the residents and businesses of R.C.! And we need to remember that were in a deep recession and all of us must limit o_u_r expectations--to one degree or another--and that includes thi5~ Cit ' vernment! Remember, President Clinton wants t~ewrtour money, too! And we may not base enough to go azound! S--I-eisa i9etievex~e~ gb et~in to oss e ci ibis?-- ~ ber, smalthusin~s sreake-mosE af-~e jobs: Anrtt[mnq-of-~esc-jobs e pte-- elnctin:tto move into R.C'~,vlttl a betty UGh-tq Tax c And (3nally, if you must raise taxes 1 would be grateful it you'd give more than "liG-service" consideration in these items: i. Make certain that the City's financial needs have been accurately estimated. There ire a~ot of numbers bantered about in the Staff Report. The City ew~a~s focus on jwtwhat it needs (not waats0 this tax to cover. A id adequately--meot.u~c. s. i. Make ~ertzm that the City Manager has cut as much out of the budget as possible. With City expenditures rising at a °~"~ 8.5~ r Pe year, ~t would seem like more cuts might be in order. Solve the budget crisis first, then tackle those secondary issues. tt ~ ore*k vx~ws Forego the "Opportunity Add-Ons" being attached on to the tax. ~ 4. >sroper care snows be given m assessing me real impact of the tax before its enactkd. Wi11 businesses be forced to lay workers off? If so, how many workers might be effected? How many business may be forced out-of-business How many new businesses will decide not to settle in R.C.? The jobs issue should be addressed before this tax is implemented. 5. There needs to be a cap for those businesses that that would pay disproportionately more simply because of the nature of there businesses. Maybe an appeals process coved be estabnshed for this. 6. There should also be a sunset clause to phase this tax out in four or five years (if not sooner). When the economy picks up again, as I am sure it will, the City will realize a healthy increase in Sales Tax and business tax revenues. This shoved go a long way toward eliminating the need [or a future Utility Tax 7. There should also be a rebate clause. if the City's revenue goal is met, then any excess revenues generated by the tax shoved be returned to the taxpayers and not retained by Ule City. Or, excess revenues shoved serve to reduce the following years Tax. R9T~. 8. Maybe the City coved establish some sort of voluntary commission, made up of business and community leaders, to study the City's budgetary needs and to make some recommendations to the City Council regarding the implementation of this tax I wows be more than willing W serve on such a commission. Thank you very much. 1 it ~ I M ' N ~ N r 1 R ~ ~ r i 1 d' ' 69 1 ~ I q N r M69 Ni df 6l ~ J ; y N MV)6A (AMW•h 69 NP ~ ry M N i P d1N 1 -DUI i N W N 1 J OI m N ~9 , ~- C4T Cry II J r -- A -NPN ~ , ry N l I r y~ I \~ C 11 0 l I I ., J 1 -- +J W p +l 0• D W f A O A 11 Jl ~ fl A~ -~ W A VI W W W P 'P f A W a C 9 U I N W N p 1 N 1 M W I W I N W I O J I J I T S 1 Ul .O 1 N p' W y ~ ~ II ~ i N /]l' O O~ A d a i p W Sll W ~I -' -~ A p J~ N ~ UI J 1 N ~ W P' \~ PI II P. I •D :. W -` 4 W I JlltJy W CONJ fl O l A I NN 1 W 1 - W I ~rti N N-' W C,1 N•D W fl P l OOUI to-J W OA O W r N r W- r W r M(APP I n a i o a W T~Gm n `D r W P. W A J-'o o u W' CJ r A P I W I OOA•O I > N _ W I i I - ' ~ < A J OO. W O~ O SH A~ NCO N 02 A p vP 00 ~ W J W N I . .I ~~~ %d Xl dV 39 ~ dd d9 dd dd b3 ~ d8 ~ A9 ~B d8 b9 dd z8 2G ' r >D N I 1 s ~ < ' N _ _ O V i T N T W N I- i i ce- - A ?' O J N~ C (1 N J -J 1 0 0 ~ l. m 9~~ W VI a a N W v v v `p P .I a A 0 N W N J~ ~ D S ---JJP-+ O W ON N•OOJ W 9 W A O I C1 m :8 A9 bB ~ dA dB dB 2B d9 dE d9 d8 09 d9 d9 dtl dR b9 dA I m r r T= N ~N ' ~ ~ r tN W A m W aA T W.ooa..oaul- o W .D a, n a8 .~1 Yf ~ 2A ~3 z3 38 a9 ~ d8 dB ~ dd a9 b9 d8 d9 711 ~ ~ N i W NWifP M69 W T W P ~~ N ~ P ~N VR (9 Hb9MHH ~ I D-~ A-• N T N 11 ~ N ~ Q' N I N N P N , P10 W i i I N I N I r I W I P I I \ ~ W C R -J ~ -` -- N fP W N~ I O {JI J N N J P •O R r N I A J l N' N9 '~-` ' L 'll V O II W' R- rq P W W A UIW T W W N A I N O I N W W P A O N W PN W J- A~ W R r N r fl I N' J) W I O- i N I N l W p -p l I \tjO II ~d 1 J W N -PP dr J W~ W W M •D j J W •D P•0O-AN •D W aJ N .O P J A N ~ ~W ~ ~l H '.D `O j O J W j J b •D j M! b9 O J W T y r II O 0 0 0 0 0 0 II O ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I fl l O O I O O ~ O 1 0 0 0 0 ~ ry r R R l l ~ l i A N W W A Wlfl A 1 O I 1 1 -~ N W A JI W+`.J~ W N W ; A ~~~ -J U I W A J N O O A W~~ J N W ~ '+ N 1 1 W a5 36 dV dd d9 dd dA c7B dB a9 7B iA d9 d8 d9 a9 d9 30 ~ !' n ,~ 0.l • O J- W H O J 1 -J I r I- ~ W `D J W W N W l t l O N ~ J r = m =~ A A [ft ~A nlUN O ~W ~D CN m~ln ~J W ~P W A O 1 ~ D iN J. W W er T W ( J i !JI f I IJ J i P O W W 'U W P 1 T ~, Oi p .p v t ~ ~ ~ PI W W ~ ~~ pp ~ p . p . ~f . p ~ p OV W OV [~ V'~ Oi P1 Oi - p aY ~ p Oi . p M . p W 1 T O O O m m m r O m 2 r rn D~ - y m3~~mz r^ ro rln p' Im z r -'cm . -~~~ r 2-A ~ rn z o v '-1 All .1l Cl m m In 7 m" A .TI rn rn A ~ S m m O m~ y ti In 4 N mxc v 3 .nom- . irnyp ^'^~ mCr ~a2~~ D o n iy nt~3'^x =< W m lk, i zcn ~3 ~ z ~ ` ' n z _a •_, n r m~ c, T n_ rn - r m rn ~p ~p n T -X T m -X 7p 1 N 9 ti 3 3_ ~J ] 1~+1 rn -I n^ ~ 'R ~ 9 'G Z ~- '~ •s ~ H G W m rJ ~ ~ C1 ~ ~ C C Z m ~AC1 G]f"12 t w i N y C .Z ~= y O , Z r 93T 1 3 D • m -i ;l ' JO r ~ p c A T O O r A m 2 O fN m v" C T \ r a y r m m N y I A r C K t-J _CmZm{O ~^ oy m D~ -i ~N x C G p O X 1 0 T m D I 1 o m TT N f'J ~ ' " ~-~.L N v T i ,~ i c i 3 rn x A 3 T 7 ~ A '~ z ~ r-O C AR= C mm rn W H N o 1 l ~i G m C = C y-1 D rn A ~ V N p t-1 i T~3 ~ = T z ~' AX N ''^ I A C O C y N ~ N ~ N ~ i mC~16J 10 A '~ N ~ x s N T N I - i N N N II M •• II I ~ II i 1 M r H? 1 1 H' 1 H it M WM r T I ~I H Hll (q dfHH N W W' q . I `D H~ I N+) N 0 M-- 1 W OJ \ II v l I A HC ~- II W i -HCN N R yu ~ I 1 1 - 1 ~ ~C W 1' II ~p A -' R W I 11 I N A O J fJ1 0 J W NP W • u W i II T P• I .D T O 1 AA 0 1 N i T W I `G JI 1 O OC i L WN T A -J T VI UI •JJ ~ . W J O W A J W A J W N N W ' O ~ ~ N ~ J A W W b j C! m Y i II ~ I I I I T r II rn I 'Jl A -' 'D II A I N N A N W ,D T~ II J I N I b JI I N I W A I m ~ II J I Ys W D Vi •D A II W I 11 P O J A Ll N W N W I UI 1 ~) J I W 1 dl M O W 1 I I ~ I O U I W O W f J I I ~ I W• D A W N O A~ R'~ I J I T~ ! W I O O J~ 1 1 W ~ ~ ~ WN I N~I '~ T N N ~~ 0 rN N fV U I UI ~ N NUI N W J T r O J - J D A W ~ N A O ~VyI n~ {' a p1 4 ~ G TI ~ Pr ~ t~ p p . p ~ ~pp ~ ~ p . p ~ p p'r ~ Vi 6i Oi W O~ W + p oV ~y v'1 ~ p TI p C'1 TI 1 II y? 1 11 H; R 1 II H; H 1 H' H 1 I II N I ~ i 69H4H fA N fA J~ UI R N ~ -' ~ biHH HM(A 69M ~ fJ W w N~ P ~' M~ ~ I N 1 j l N~ 0 I N 1 N I 69N ~ I 61 P~ r . l X W I M (q -- W JN~- 11 ~ I N~N~T rO (!I W J> M A I W I fr9. A W I W I . W W ~- 1 C Wy n T I p N VI W S W R W I JI T W O O -~ rO J M W I I W I I b T I I D A I J I O N W 1 NUIT 1 ~ 0 \~ N T I NNU1J JT Y T I NA ~ON-~UIJ II rD J T u n J i O T• O T-~~ G W NNrDO W W p N i T ~O N W~ r O W N -J T•D T'A rG •Ub W J~ N W i J ~ N i T O I -~ ~ W I w U 1 N ~ /rNAP+ 1 ~ r N R I UI IJ ~~ UI O T I 11 b W b "D W N r0 0 R I W I 1 A l •O Vi I N I 0 0 W b 1 R I I u p 1 I I 1; . Q= C N~ ~ ~ C y .~ C N J W~ W N~ A ~ ~ .~ ~ N _ ' 1 T n ' - J %Q -~ ! W W UJ A ~ ~c~ ~ ~r~ ~ ~ J •D N rJ G N A W ~~~ ~~ ~~~ A ~ J ~ N ~ W J ~ ~~ I ( i II t H II ; N~ R ~ n ~ 1 H ~ I N~ I ~ ; ~ i I fJ MHHH 1 HHHHHM A f J N 1 AY W Ir A i y) yr UI T J. P. II '-') 1 H H: J W`-_• Ja N II 1 A 1 A 1 o i H H W 1 \~ C A j Cri r~ O N rN m I I W 1 W T f J~ b A •D -' 11 N I n 1 A I ~; A W W I O~ ~'' I 'T S. J W W -J ~ O~ N ~ f J •D P. W O P R O j O~ O~ b 1 W b O ~ ~~ I I. ~ ~ 1 I 0 1 G 1 A I ~D W T I r"I II O I ~ I T(II ~NN J ~D n T l II W I A T W JA AOT O~N~-JTAJ1 W I 1 II ~ 1 yr -~ 1 J 1 Y10 W W 1 O II O I I W N•Y J-I ~rN (IIW T N n W r 'O rn USA~A00 W 1 N O~ 00 1 J r o W m W 1 I ~ f N N w wWw- ~ N---- ~ - A 1 1 W i n O- ~~ T' _ W W J•v~rn-- W wJ.OO W W rnT P rG ! t ~3 aB a9 ~a9 aV a8 b9 a9 ad a9 :A~29~~ ~ ~ dd ~~ 11 ~y II H 1 II x I II H; H; H 1 H 1 ~i N i WWiR 69 di N ~ MW W{A H6AW{R ~ N r N N ~ Y1 N j Ir '.l i Kr .y WT J W ~ I~ A 1 ~'JI~ P _' NNN ~ ~ ~ 11 H "I I iq.'J I ~ I N rqA I \AC II ~~ ~ II r_q I -- •_, }? W r.l A A ~~O -.J -~~ II ,D 1 Il O r Vi T N -.J A -.J A W OT ANTNA 11 N 1 u W I W I J l W O I Nrp I L I T I A W ~O I U1 00 1 0 W~ (' l ' II A I ~D A F +J -~ T II CN ' -- W UI W W P rD T N ,p 1 -J 1 W A I r l P• N W 1 i \ ~ T II I ' S I:I <y 'S CG r-4 rtl O~ T W O I J J II P I O A'O ~~D N--TNT ~ n J A T• G I V I J v J y A 1 •O I I T I O-' 1 -' N I T 1 W I O N A 1 O W U I 1 ~r ~ I I I II i? ~ , -.l .J f i C.i J. _.J I p p pl I f.~ J •7 N UI N UI b R 11 A 1 N 1 O N 1 P` r O O~ W 1 ~ ~ N T N 1 ~ -~ -~ O N W J W~ W 1 P 1 J N r 1 W N i A m •~ qp J ~ W Ul 0- N N J - ~ ('I ?~ :fl 3J ~~3~1 ~ 1.6 .~~~ %JB ~<Q~~ ~ ~ Ad X08