Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999/07/07 - Agenda PacketII ......II .......... II ! ..................... CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1 st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. July 7, 1999 Civic. Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Bob Dutton, Councilmember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 City Council Agenda July 7, 1999 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. Roll Call: A. CALL TO ORDER Alexander , Biane ~_ Curatalo__, Dutton__ and Williams B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of Certificates to Award Winners of the Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Academy Teen Fine Art Show. Presentation from the California Resource Recovery Association (CRRA) to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Environmental Learning Center for Best Public Education Program. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to. be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Theywill be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutes: June 10, 1999 (Special Meeting) Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 6/9/99, 6/16/99 and 6/23/99 and Payroll ending 6/6/99 for the total amount of $7,404,203.62. Approval of Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off-Sale Beer and Wine for Eli Tarasco Market Meat Market, Aguilar G. Horta, Duran Rigoberto, Hernandez J. Cueliar, and Mejia Jose Martin Ceja, 8161 W. Foothill Blvd. Approval of Comcast Cablevision's Internal Restructuring and Reorganization. 17 19 City Council Agenda July 7, 1999 o o 10. 11. RESOLUTION NO. 99-147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE INTERNAL RESTRUCTURING OF COMCAST CABLEVISION OF THE INLAND VALLEY, INC. Approval to authorize the execution of Program Supplement No. 001 -M to the Administering Agency-State Agreement No. 08-5420, covering the Realignment of Carnelian Street from Vivero Street to 1000 feet south. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the contract (CO 99-063) for the Installation of ADA-Compliant Drinking Fountains in various city parks to Ramazan Construction in the amount of $78,068 ($70,968 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Account Nos. 40-4130-9405, 43-4130-9405, 01-4647-6028, 47- 4130-9528, and 90-4130-9405. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the contract (CO 99-064) for the construction of 1998t99 FY Local Street Rehabilitation, Slurry Seal, to Valley Slurry Seal Company, in the amount of $190,674.15 ($173,340.14 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Measure I, Account No. 32-4637-9113. Approval ~:o award and authorize the execution of the contract (CO99-065) for the construction of the Carnelian Street Realignment and Storm Drain Improvements, between Vivero Street and 1000 Feet South of Vivero Street, to All American Asphalt in the Amount of $751,847.24 ($683,497.49 plus 10% Contingency) to be funded from General Drainage Account No. 23-4637-9823 in the Amount of $266,352.37, Istea Account No. 24-4637-9,826 in the Amount of $450,000 and Measure I Account No. 32-4637-9826 in the Amount of $35,494.87. Approval t:o appropriate $130,000 from Measure I (Fund 32 ~ Account No. 32-4637-9845) and the approval to award execution of Professional Services Agreement (CO 99-060) to Traffic Control Service, In., for the Citywide Pavement Survey and Digital Imaging Project to be funded from Measure I (Local) Funds (Account No. 32-4637-9845) for the amount of $130,000.00. Approval to release the Maintenance Bond for 5291 Sapphire Street, submitted by James A. Brown and Joyce Brown. Approval to release the Faithful Performance Bond held as a Maintenance Bond for Tract 13753, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. 20 23 25 29 36 42 44 46 City Council Agenda July 7, 1999 12. Approval to release the Maintenance Bond for Tract 15732, submitted by Lewis Homes Enterprises, a California General Partnership. 48 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. DISCUSSION OF CENTRAL PARK PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE AND CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE ELECTION MATTERS CONSIDERATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A public hearing to consider certifying the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a proposed project known as the Victoria Arbors Village on 291.8 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community, generally bounded by Base Line Road, future Victoria Park Lane, future Church Street, future Day Creek Boulevard, Foothill Boulevard, and the Day Creek Channel - APN: 227'-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 30, and 36; 222- 201,33; 2:27-161-33, 35, 36 and 38; 227-171-11, 12, and 14. RESOLUTION 99-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AS HAVING BEEN COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) 50 59 180 City Council Agenda July 7, 1999 4 CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99- 02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, consolidating the Industrial Area Specific Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement, Caryn Planned Community Development Plan, and Residential Commercial/Industrial Design Guidelines into appropriate sections of the Development Code. Related fines: Industrial Areas Specific Plan Amendment 99-03, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, and Caryn Planned Community Amendment 99-01. ORDINANCE NO. 604 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-02, AMENDING CHAPTERS 17.02, 17.08, 17.10, 17.12, 17.14 AND ADDING CHAPTERS 17.30 AND 17.32 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING CONSOLIDATION OFTHE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN; THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIfiC PLAN; THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DESIGN SUPPLEMENT; CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; AND THE RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES INTO A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL AR~.A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to consolidate the Industrial Area Specific Plan regulatory provisions and design guidelines into the Development Code. Related files: Development Code Amendment 99-02, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, and Caryn Planed Community Amendment 99-01. ORDINANCE NO. 605 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03, TO CONSOLIDATE PORTIONS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND REPEALING ALL OTHER SECTIONS OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN 181 183 181 185 City Council Agenda July 7, 1999 5 CONSIDERATION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to consolidate the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan regulatory provisions and design guidelines into the Development Code. Related files: Development Code Amendment 99-02, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, and Caryn Planned Community Amendment 99-01. RESOLUTION NO. 99-149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, TO CONSOLIDATE PORTIONS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND REPEALING AI.L OTHER SECTIONS OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN CONSIDERATION OF CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to consolidate the Caryn Planned Community Development Plan regulatory provisions into the Development Code. Related files: Development Code Amendment 99-02, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment: 99-01, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-01. ORDINANCE NO. 606 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, TO CONSOLIDATE PORTIONS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND REPEALING ALL OTHER SECTIONS OF THE CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSIDERATION OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-02 CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to designate the Beckley house as a Local Landmark, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street at 6729 Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre- Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-.08. 181 187 181 189 191 City Council Agenda July 7, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. 99-150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-02, TO DESIGNATE THE BECKLEY HOUSE (BUILT IN APPROXIMATELY 1934) AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM STRE. ET, AT 6729 HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change General Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Ave. & 19t~ St. - APN: 1076-111-0,9. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related files: Development District Amend. 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02. RESOLUTION NO. 99-151 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09 CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02 CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the Development District zoning designation from Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4 - 8 dwelling uni:ts per acre) for approximately 5. t acres of land located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Ave. and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: General Plan Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 202 204 238 204 City Council Agenda July 7, 1999 10. ORDINANCE NO. 607 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PERACRE), FORAPPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 - CURRY BRAN DAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a two-story residential care facility for the elderly totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in the Low- Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Amendment 99-02, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02. RESOLUTION NO. 99-152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-08 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY CONSISTING OF 114 SUITES FOR THE ELDERLY IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ON APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TM STREET AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09 240 204 243 City Council Agenda July 7, 1999 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMIS~ION'S DECISION REGARDING A WALL SIGN FUNCOLAND - A request to display a multicolor wall sign within Terra Vista Town Center, located at 10730 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 140 .- APN: 1077-421-75. (TO BE CONTINUED TO JULY 21, 1999) 258 H.,....... CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE DUES INCREASE FOR SAN BAG MEMBERSHIP CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES SUBCOMMITTEE TO MODIFY THE POLICY REGARDING FIELD LIGHTING FEES 260 271 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. City Council Agenda July 7, 1999 L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS: PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT ROCHESTER, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE; JACK LAM, CITY MANAGER, AND KEVIN MCARDLE, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTIES, REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT. POTENTIAL LITIGATION PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 1, 1999, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. June I 0, 1999 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, Redevelopment Agency and Fire Protection District was held on Thursday, June 10, 1999, in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:35 p.m. by Mayor/Chairman/President William J. Alexander. Present were Council/Agency/Boardmembers: Paul Blanc, James Curatalo, Bob Dutton, Diane Williams (arrived at 5:35 p.m.), and Mayor/Chairman/President William J. Alexander (left the meeting at 5:55 p.m.). Also present were: .Jack Lam, City Manager; Larry Temple, Administrative Services Director; Tamara Layne, Finance Officer; Rose Colurn, Budget Analyst; Ingrid Blair, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor; Stacy Robinson, Accountant; Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Brad Buller, City Planner; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Dave Moore, Recreation Superintendent; Melissa Morales, Administrative Secretary; Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Agency Director; Deborah Clark, Library Director; Captain Rodney Hoops, Police Department; Chief Dennis Michael, Fire Protection District; Alex Ahumada, Administrative Services Director/Fire; Michelle Bancroft, Management Analyst II; Diane O'Neal, Assistant to the City Manager; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION B 1. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000 A power point presentation of the proposed budget for fiscal year 1999/2000 was made by Jack Lam, City Manager, He told about the process for the workshops and the adoption of the budgets. A copy of the power point presentation is on file in the CiW Clerk's office. Mayor Alexander left the meeting at 5:55 p.m. Councilmembers Biane and Curatalo stated they have no questions and felt Mr. Lam and staff have done a good job with the budget. Councilmember Dutton stated he has spent a lot of time studying the budget and stated he is impressed with what he sees. Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated she echos those comments previously made. She opened the meeting for any public input regarding this matter. There being no response, public comments were closed. City Council/Redevelopment Agency/Fire Protection Dis~ictMinutes June 10, 1999 Page 2 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated copies of the budget are available at the Library and at the City Clerk's counter. He added the Chamber of Commerce has also been given a copy. Mr. Lam mentioned there had been a goal session earlier in the year and that those items discussed at that time have been included as directed by Council. Councilmember Curatalo suggested the next scheduled meeting pertaining to the budget be used to adopt the budget instead of just having a workshop since there were apparently no questions. The Council concurred. Mr. Lam, City Manager, stated the regular Council meeting to be held June 16 would adjourn to June 17 at 5:30 in the Council Chambers to adopt the budget. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. D. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Dutton, seconded by Biane to adjourn the City Council to Tuesday, June 15, 1999, 6:00 p.m. at the Lions Park Community Center (west), to meet jointly with the Central Park Task Force to discuss the Task Force's recommendations. The Redevelopment Agency would be adjourning to Monday, June 14, 1999, 9:30 a.m. in the Tri Communities Room of the Civic Center for the purpose of a field trip to inspect commercial property located at the southeast comer of Winchester and Santa Ynez Road, Temecula, California. Motion carried unanimously 4-0-1 (Alexander absent). Sincerely, Approved: * Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LiST OF wARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-09-99 (98/99) RUN DATE: 06/09/99 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. O~ CHECKe OVERLAP 4347 ACCURATE SHOG~ AUTO~ TRUCK & VE~ICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES ~ 139995~ le574o61- (¢( 139996 - 140040 ((( 140042 - 160191 ((( 140193 - 140194 I AA E~U[P~ENT RENTALS CO.~ [NCo VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES I 160195 68.02 2732 ABe LOCKSMITHS MA[NTENANCE SUPPLIES I 140196 611.20 7 ABLETRONICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 160197 4347 ACCURATE $MOG~ AUTCe TRUCK : V~ICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLiES # 140198 5792 ADA~, ROBERT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140199 122.~0 2!! ADT SECURITY SERV:CES~ ~NCo ALARM SERVICE 160200 ,207 ALERT COMMUNICATIONS CO. INSTALLATION/SERVICE 140201 85.00 3448 ALL ~ELO[NG MAINTENANCE REPAIRS e 140202 323.~0 3778 ALPERT, ~ELAhIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140203 5650 ALTA LOMa PSYCHOLOGICal ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14020& 326S ALTA LOMA SCHOOL DI&TRICT GYP RE~TAL-VINEYARO JR HIGH 140205 lt12~.00 1~30 AMERICAN BUS~NESS FORMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 140206 &BSO AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 140207 21273 AMERICAN WILDERNESS ZOO g A~UARIUM OA¥ CA~P FIELD TRIP 160208 23.80 21973 AMERICAN WILGERN£SS :00 & AQUARIUM DAY CAMP FIELD TRiP 140209 60.7S 24 A~BOR NURSERY INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140210 619.56 5807 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 160211 10~943.10 ~299 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 160212 50°59 2*37 ASSOCIATED GROUP, THE MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE 140213 60.00 5756 AUDIO REPLACEMENT TAPE SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140216 7.60 1135 AUTO SPECIALISTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 140~!5 ~SoO0 4102 B ~ K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 160216 243°65 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE ~AINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 140217 199.20 bI4Z BASSETT-SMZTH~ TERRI RECREATION REFUND 140218 5791 BELETTO, NANCT iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140219 140o00 5~19 ~ENSON~ MAURY iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140220 372o00 bl3Z BILINGUAL PUgLICAT~ONS COoe THE LIBRART SUPPLIES 140221 45°90 1g47 BLAKE PAPER CO°~ INC. RECREATION SUPPLIES 140222 399.96 4*87 BOLKAe SHEILA INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140223 27o00 ~833 BOOKS ON TAPE~ ~NCo L~BRARY SUPPLIES 14022& 10.78 ~699 BORDNER~ MARGIE INSTRUCTOR PHT e 140225 719o40 l&Z BRADFOROe HAROLD INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 160226 130.80 ((( l~OgZ7 - 160229 ~69 BRODART BOOKS LleRARY SUPPLIES I 140230 Ze370.32 1166 BRUNSWICK CEER CREE~ LANES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 160231 417.60 5591 BURCHFIELD~ gARRELL ~NSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 160232 18~o00 552 BURK-BLACK$ChLEGER, ROSEANN iNSTRUCTOR PMT 140233 6e450.96 1851 CAL WESTERN PAINT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 160234 · 412 CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC ENTRY MAZNTEKANCE SUPPLIES/SERViCE 140235 21274 CALLAC~ ALLEN VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION 140236 48°00 4735 CALOLYHPZC SAFETY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 160237 478.70 1223 CALSENSE OFFiCE/~AZNTENANCE E~U~PMENT a 160238 21271 CASTILLO. RENE LIABILITY SETTLEMENT 140239 1.608o00 68 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 140240 1.370.89 6227 CERTIFIED TOWING RECREATION REFUND 140241 125.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-09-99 (98199) RUN DATE: 06/09/99 PAGE: Z · ............................. . ............................. ITEM DESCrIPTiON ~ARR NO ~ARR. 570 CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANV 713 CMICK'S SPORTING G~O~S INC ?~ CITY RENTALS 969 CLARK. KAREN 6641 CMD SYSTEMS, INC. 5~07 COMBINEO MARTIAL SCIENCE 130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 663 COMPUTERLAND 21~72 CORTEZ, SHONNA 6292 COSTCO 6236 COSTCO c/o HCUSEHOLD ~ANR · F. 85 CUCAMONGA CO WATE~ DIST 4488 DAGHDEvIRIAN, KATHY 6145 OAVZSs SAM 3~7 DAY-TIMERS. INC. 512! O~ VOOGHTe SCOTT Jo 456~ DICKs E~IC 57&4 DIRECTV 3~8~ OOC JOE'S 5788 DUFFY, RICK/bSRO 36619 ECONOMICS ~RESS, INC., THE 336~ EIGHTH AVENUE GRAPHICS 5767 ELITE PERSONNEL SERVICES, ~137 EMPIRE ~BILE HOME SERVICE 229 EWING IRRIGATIDN PRDDUCTS ~916 EXCLUSIVE EMAGES 5917 FASTENAL COPPANY 155 FILARSKY : WATT 36682 GAGNONe JEFF 5502 GIOROANO, PARIANNA 3388 GOLDEN BEA2 ARBORISYS, INC. 3312 GOODHEART· PAULA A386 GREGORYm CHERI 137 GTE CALIFORNIA ~686 GUARDIAN 6127 HANGER 18 820 HEARD P.HoCo, EDWARD 333~ HEILIG, KELLY 5~60 HIDALGO· CARLO 5548 HIGHLANO GARCEN CENTER, INC. 15a HOLL[OAT R~CK CO.s INC. Z255 HOLT'S AUTC ELECTRIC · 033 HOME DEPOT CREOIT SERVICE 1236 HOSEMAN 161 HOYT LUMEER CO., S.M. 2~12 HOYTs RAYMOND 695 HYORO-SCAPE PROCUCTS, INC INC. Oe CHECK# OVERLAP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES · 1&0242 800.00 R~CREATION SUPPLIES # 140243 51e.87 6~UIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES 140244 676°80 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140245 266°00 SERVICE & REPAIR 1402~6 SO.00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140247 1~179o00 ((( 160248 - 140248 S~GNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES # 1~0249 9~A~6o66 COPPUT£R MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES ~ 140250 323.25 RECREATION REFUN~ 140251 26.00 RECREATION SUPPLIES 160252 50°00 §USINESS LICENSE REFUND 160253 389.52 ¢<< 160254 - 140255 MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS ~ 140256 7~923.98 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140257 ~5~o00 CONTRACT SERVICES 1A0258 650°00 OFFICE SUPPLZES i 160259 76olz PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140260 360.00 EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH 140261 100oO0 SUBSCRIPTION ~ 140262 24.95 MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 160263 1~000.00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 14026& SUBSCRIPTION 14026~ 26.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160266 PERSONNEL SERVICES 160267 1s363.6~ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 160268 553.00 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES ~ 140269 601.70 OFF~CE SUPPLIES 140270 72.73 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140271 263.89 MONTHLY SERVICES ~40272 ~EFUND 14027~ 500.00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ~ 1602T6 1~0.00 PRCFESSIONAL SERVICES # 160275 22,9~9o00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140276 659°00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1~0277 60°00 ((( 1~0278 - 160278 MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS e 140279 2s160.41 MECICAL PREMIUM 140280 684~80 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 160g81 INSTRUCTOR PMT 1402~Z 105.00 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT I6028~ ~NSTRuCTOR PAYMENT 140286 276.00 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 160285 37.7! MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e 140286 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140287 193.~5 ((( 140288 - 160288 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES i 160289 1,388.67 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ! 140290 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES $ 140291 777.03 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 14029Z ls063.~0 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 140293 ~66o80 VENDOR 167 5882 103 ~6 92 6ZOZ 2315 61Z *TO0 31536 3491 ZZZO ~329 6090 172 6~55 5411 321 5216 8~9 5865 5274 3055 5662 5313 1062 ~o00 7z ~7Z7 ~Ol 5755 ZZ(8 433 309 52~0 365 7194 527 30~9 396~ ~3ZT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-09-99 C98/99) RUN OATE: 06/09/99 PAGE: NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARRo AMTo O0 CHECKI OVERLAP I C B 0 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140294 I C M A REITREMENT TRUST - iO1 O1 I 140295 5s791.39 i L ~ A RETIR6HENT TRuST-~57 DEFERRED COMP 140296 691.00 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 14029~ 69.66 INLAND LAWNPOdER VEHICLE HAINTENANCE 140228 67°34 INLAND LIBRARY SVST~P MEMBERSHIP OUES 140299 300.00 INLAND VALLEY OAILY BULLETIN SUESCRIPTIONS 140300 32°76 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140301 352°00 INLAND WHOLESALE NURSERY HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 140302 208.39 JAESCHKE INC.e CoRD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE a 140303 349.08 JONESt KEITH INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140304 316o80 KEANEs MARJORIE RECREATION 140305 80.00 KELLEY BLUE BOOK NE~ CAR PRICE MANUAL 140306 84.00 KELLY PAPER COMPANY PAPER SUPPLIES 1~0307 170o54 KING. PATRICK INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140308 147.00 RONGe SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 140309 360.00 ~OZLOVICH~ DE~IE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140310 Z~146o50 KUHNe MARY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14031! KYPTA ASSOCIATES. INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 140312 LAEROAL MEDICAL CORPORATION RECREATION SUPPLIES 140313 538°75 LANOSCAPE ~EST~ INC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE A 140314 2,332.50 LAB ROSAS - EHHA SORCINI INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140315 ~3.50 LA~SDN PROCUCTS~ INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES i 140316 1~063.02 LE~IS PARTNERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ~40317 LITTLE BEAR PROOUCTIONS GRAPHIC DESIGNER ~40~18 LONG°S DRUGS FIL~ PROCESSING 140319 134.49 LOPEZe SPRING CASH AOVANCE 140320 LOS ANGELES CHILDREMS MUSEU~ RECREATION SUPPLIES 140321 147o00 LOS ANGELES COCA CCLA BTL. CO. RECREATION SUPPLIES # 140322 424.05 LO~E, MARIAANE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1~0323 170.0o M C I TELeCOmMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE SERVICES · 140324 1,3~0.86 H S A MEMBERSHIP # 140325 400.00 MARK CHRIS, INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140326 132.31 MARSHALL PLUMBING REHAB. PROGRAM ~ 140327 2e049.50 MARSHALL~ SYLV:A RECREATION REFUND · 140328 668°88 MOUNTAIN VIEb INLAND PO~L MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140329 <C( 140330 - 140330 NAPA AUTO PARTS VE~ICLE MAINTENANCE a 140331 NATIONAL DEFERRED OEFERRED COMP 140332 2s196.00 NIXON-EGLI £GUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 140333 109.28 0 C ~ R~PRGGRAPHIC~, INC MEIROLINR 140334 21o77 OOIN METROLOGY MAINTENANCE 140335 587o6~ ((( 140336 - 140336 OFFICE DEPgT OFFICE SUPPLIES e 140337 OLD QUAKER PAINT COMPANY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140338 79o51 OLIVIERe MICPAEL REFUNO PERS OEOUCTZON 140339 100o00 OLYMPIC STUDIOS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1403.0 2s234.25 ONTARIO FIRE EXTINGUISHER CO. FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICES 1.0341 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140342 499.20 ORANGE SPORTING GOODS rZ DOZEN SOFTBALLS 140343 25.75 O~EN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES e I(03k4 361o~9 VENDOR 31535 S318 6148 6089 2719 758 5J16 3286 65 4~40 251 4451 2600 11233 5665 5914 3335 16 ~70~ 1292 301 5338 5317 11177 4½59 1105 503~ 5005 5950 5950 5950 351 ~513 692 1327 10399 143Z 5722 2647 4733 5-10 2344 636 2718 6230 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIdO: 06-09-99 (98/99) RUN DATE: 06/09/99 PAGE: 4 .................................................................................................................... ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. CHECK# OVERLAP PACIFIC COAST HAIR BUSINESS LICENSE 140345 62.30 PACIFIC EQUIPT & IRRIGAT~ONt INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140346 25°26 PARKER, SHANNON INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140347 108.00 PETERMAN LuM~ER ~ARTH~UAKE PREPAREDNESS KIT J ~40348 10717°84 PIRONt SHAUN CONTRACT SER¥ICES 140349 185.00 PITTS~ LISA RECREATION REFUNO 140350 22ao00 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO VEHICLE MAZNTENANCE& SUPPLIES ~ 140351 PONCHAUD, JANICE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1403~2 a6.~o PRAXAIR DISTRIBUflCN. INC. MAINT/RECREATiON SUPPLIES I 140~53 73.16 PRECISION bYPNASTICS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1~035~ 282.00 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL MEEZCAL/OISABILITY INSURANCE 140355 P~UOENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 140356 700.60 PUTMANe BILL ~ANG COMPUTER SERVICE 140357 166.66 R & R AUTOPOTIVE VEHICLE MAINT~SUPPLIESLSERVICE !40358 48.00 R C ~UAKES PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL TGIF MINI PLAN 140359 3~6.00 RANCHO CUCAHONGA FIRE DISTRICT SALARY AND BENEFITS 140360 16.2& REED, JOHN CONTRACT SERVICES 140361 675.00 REGULATION COMPLIAN£~ INC. TRAINING SERVICEs 140362 REXEL CALCDN ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES e 140363 159.~3 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS e 14036~ ROBINSON FERTILIZER LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES ~ 140365 2e187.23 ROSE~ CHRISTIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140366 81.00 ROTARY CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 140367 191.31 RUSH, CHRIS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT # 140368 495.00 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS RECREATION SUPPLIES 140369 380oll SAN BERN CC~NTY SHERIFFS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE 1~0370 7,466.15 SAN BERN~ CITY OF TELETHON SUPPORT # 14037I SANTANA, LIVIER INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140372 298.35 SCHOOL WISE PRESS LIBRARY SUPPLIES I 140373 264.36 SCRRA RJCHE~TER GRADE CROSSING e 14037~ 3,797.54 SEAL FURNITURE ~ SYSTEMS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 140375 185.00 SENN~ CINDY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140376 14.40 SHAFTON, INC. PROTECTIVE SUPPLIES 140377 300.00 SNESHUNUFF INFORMATION SERVICES ANNUAL/TST/IMP 140378 300°95 SHESHUNOFF INFORMATION SERVICES ANNUAL/TST/ZMP 140379 280.95 S~ESHUNOFF INFORMATION SERVICES ANNUAL/TST/[MP 140380 320.95 SIGN SHOP, THE MAZNT SUPPLIES 140381 SIMON ~ SCHUSTER LIBRARY SUPPLIES 140382 68.84 SIR SPEEDY OFFICE SUPPLIES 140383 627.36 SMART & FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES e 140384 155.74 SO CALIr ASSOC ~F GOVERNMENTS MEMBERSHIP OUES 140385 ((( 140386 - 140393 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EO150N MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS e 140394 35~764.02 SPECTRA COPPANT L~BOR AND SUPPLIES · 140395 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL MGHT.~ INC. S~RVICE ANO SUPPLIES 140396 19,105o00 SUNRISE FDkC AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES e 140397 5ZB.Z1 T E 0 INSTALLATIONS SUPPLIES 1&0398 65o00 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CaMP SUPPL a 140399 203.50 TARGET SPECIALTY PROOUCTS MAiNT SUPPLIES 140400 230°86 T£RRY, O~N~A INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140401 180.00 TITAN INDUSTRIAL FCOTWEAR CORP. RECREATION REFUND $ 1~0402 290.8Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FGR PERIOD: 06-09-99 (9B/99) RUN DATE: 06/09/99 PAGE: 5 ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. 3333 T20D, SYLVIA 1919 TOMARK SPORTS INC. Z?3T U C REGENTS ~SS8 U S GUARCS CO.. INC. UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIQUE CREATIDNS UPLANO TENNIS CLUB VALLEY SLURaT SEAL CO. VILL~CANA, DEBORA~ VISTA PAINT VLSYSTEMS, INC. WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES wEST GROUP WESTERN POLY DRUM WHI/AKERt RICHARD RILLDAN ASSOCIATES WOOOe SUE YAHO0 INTERNET LI~E ~0 CHECKI OVERLAP INSTRUCTOR P&¥MENT 140403 135.00 PiCkET GUIDE 140405 i~.00 SECURITY GUARD SERVICE e 140406 2,050.05 UMP SERVICES ~ 140407 UNIFORM SERVICES ~ 1~0~08 903o86 1ST A~ KITS 1~0~09 9~.89 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1~0~10 996°00 MAINTENANCE 140&X1 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 1~O~1Z l&~.00 MAINT SUPPLIES 1~0~3 ~1.39 COMPUTER MAROWARE I 1~04!~ 5.31Z.50 MAINT SUPPLIES 140415 SECURITY GUARD SERVICES 1~0~16 997.89 PUBLISHING # ~40417 255.80 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 140&18 Z94.10 LEGISLATIVE TRIP TO SACTO 1.0419 300.00 PROFESSIDNAL SERVICES I~O~ZO ~85.7B RECREATION REFUNO 1%0421 160.00 SUE$CRIPTION 140422 19.97 TOTAL 3Z~,459.97 CIIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: O&~16-g9 VENDOR NAME CARDENAS, ED PARDUE PRODUCTIONS MOBILE D. J~ 2717 U C REGENTS 4635 2732 7 3634 4373 6250 5803 478D 18~6 6199 ~1D77 ~1D76 17 605~ 5658 4450 ~1273 Dt~73 21278 1291 5864 3637 5756 402 21D75 ~1280 410~ ~1~8~ 47 6067 4441 4407 1~47 ~t~Sl ~1~88 ~1~46 ~1~83 588! A & K PHO]OORAPHY AA EQUIPMFNT RENTALS CO , INC ABC LOCKSMITHS ADLETRONICS ABM BUSINESS MACHINES~ INC. AgO SANITATION ADAMS, NIC~ ADECCO ~MPLOYMENT SERVICES ADVANCED ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. AEF SYSTEMS CONSULTING, INC. AIRTOUCH CELLULAR ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ALL ~TATE PAPER & METAL RECYCLINg ALLIED ELECTRONICS, INC. ALTA FIRE E~UIPMENT CO AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT AMERICAN FIRST AID & SAFETY AMERICAN LIBRARY A~80CIATION AMERICAN WILDERNESS ZOO & AQUARIUM AMERICAN WILDERNESS ZOO & AGUARIUM AMOS ADJUS[INQ ARCUS DATA SECURITY ASL CONSULTING ENGINEERS ASPA ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS AUDIO EDITIONS AUDIO REPLACEMENT TAPE SERVICE AUTO RESTORATORS AVENUE PLAZA HOTEL ~ & d CUSTOM CRAFTS B & K ELECTSI~ WHOLESALE BAQ SPECIALISTS BEENE~S INSURANCE BILLING, MARY BELL & HOWELL BERRYMAN & HENIGAR BEST BUY CO., INC. BETTER ENeRgY IDEAS BLAKE PAPER CO. , INC B~OC~BUSTER ENTERTAINMENT GROUP BRODART BOOKS CALD~ON, DANIEL CALIFORNIA BOX CQ II CARDENA~ ED CARDIN ASPHALT & REAL CART~ Q~APH SYS?EM~ RUN DA1 [ 06/16/97 PAQE: 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT ** CHECK# OVERLAP RECREATION REFUND 139554a (<,C 139555 .- 139~" BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 1399~6~ <{4 1399~7 - 139977 POC½ET ~UIDE 139978~ ~C<< 139979 PHOTO DEVELOPING & SUPPLIES 1404~ VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 1404~6 MAINTENANCE S~PPLIES # 1404~7 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1404~8 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1404~9 E~UIPMENT RENTAL # 140430 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140431 EMPLOYMEMT SERVICE8 140433 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140433 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE8 # 140434 CELLULAR PHONE BILLINGS 140435 RECREATION REFUND # 140436 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140437 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140438 SERVICE/SUPPLIES 140439 ADVERTISINg FEE 140440 SUPPLIES 14044] OFFICE SUPPEIES 14044~ DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP 140443 DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP 140444 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140445 DATA STORAGE 140446 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140447 MEMBERSHIP DUES 140448 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 140449 BUSINESS LICEN~E REFUND 140450 MAINTENANCE 5~PLIES 140451 V~HICLE MAINTENANCE 14045~ REGISTRATION 140453 BUSINESS L!CE~E REFUND 140454 MAINTENANCE ~PLIE8 ~ 140455 BUSINESS LICE~E REFUND 140456 8USINES8 LIC~E REFUND 140457 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 140458 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140459 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1404&0 PROFE5SI~AL SERVICES ~ 1404&~ RECREATION 8~PLIES ~ 1404&~ BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 1404~3 LIBRARY ~UPPCIES ~ !404~4 PARKINg CITAT!~ REFUND 140465 BUSINESS LICE~E REF~D 1404~6 RECREATION REF~D 140467 BUSINES8 LICENBE REFUND 140460 M~INTENANCE S~PL~E8 1404hg 450 300 OO- 144 00- 7 39 7 93 323 49 1 I 64 249 50 255 04 I 15 O0 136 O0 1, 536 3, 7,50 OO 43 4o 68, 661 39 130. 36 46 O0 98. 76 39. 48 233. 6O ~10 O0 95 ~0 ~43 O0 15. 30 333. 75 3t, ~84 50 95 O0 ~, 8~ 50 17 16 15 70 ~, ~83 76 510 16 33 O0 ~50. O1 79 13 14 46 3, 186 69 9, 5~0 00 86 19 8~ 04 175 g?O 15~ 76 107. O0 46 O0 450 C)O 18 O0 4, 350 O0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-16-99 (98199) VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR ANT 21284 CHEVRON STATIONS, INC. #1812 21285 CHILE RED 5958 CHIVERS AUDIO BOOKS 2!587 CHP. T SP C ~t~_P~N v 73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INC 74 CItY RENTALS ~470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 4301 COMPUSA, INC 643 COMPUTERLAND e~l COONS C~STRUCT ION 85 CUCAMONOA CO WATER DI~T ~39 D & ~ CONCRETE CO ~4 DAISY WHEEL ~IB~ON CO, INC 6145 DAVIS, SAM 34Z DAY fIMERS, INC 347 DAY -TIMERS, INC. D6695 D; ~4T~N ONE 5809 DIE T~RICH-P05~ COMPANY 4205 D~NAMIC ORAPHI CS, INC <~z7 E b R I, INC 5767 ~L 11E PERSONNEL SERVICES~ INC 4360 FMP AMERICA, INC. 3AAg~ EMPIRE MEDICAL BILLINQ SERVICES 3312 ~SKENAZ I, MOI SES 5Pf,2 FVANS SPORTIN~ ~00DS ;'~ EWINQ IRRI~ATION PRODUCTS · I f37~ FL~FT ~LASS 476~ FUOIHILL FAMILY SHELTER FOPD OF UPLAND, INC. FLffH) P~INTIN~ & M~ILIN~, INC FRANKLIN COVEY CO. FRANKI.IN COVEY CO FU~ tqH IMA, Jt/D I TFI ~AI}AItOUT TOURS INC CA~C IA, VIVIAN ~IUNB INO, MICHAEL ~L F NN, WILLIE gLOBAL TELE-DATA CORPORATION QHEEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT GRUI. IER PUBLISHINO COMPANY ~%~ TELECOM CALIFORNIA glE CALIFORNIA HAL[~ER~, NANCY HARALAMBOS BEVERA~E COMPANY HARO ENGINEERINO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND BUSINESS LICEN~E REFUND LIBRARY SUPPLIES OVERPAYMENT ON BID PACKETS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES EOUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND ** CHECK# OVERLAP 140470 14047! 140472 140473 140474 # 140475 140476 # 140477 # 140478 140479 <(4 140480 - 140485 MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS # 140483 STREET MAINTENANCE # 1404~4 OFFICE SUPPLIER # 140485 CONTRACT SERVICES 140486 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14048'7 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140488 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140489 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140490 OFFICE EGUIPMENT 1404~t SOFTWARE SUPPORT FEES 14049~ PERSONNel SERVICES 140493 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1404~4 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140495 REIMBURSEMENT 140496 RECREATION SUPPLIES 140497 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES # 140498 LABOR & SUPPLIES # 1404~ FAMILY SHELTER I40500 SUBSCRIPTION 140501 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 140502 MAINTENANCE ~ OPERATIONS 140509 SUBSCRIPTION 140504 OFFICE SUPPLIES # 140503 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 PROFESSIONAL. SERVICES ] RECREAT ION 140508 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT I4050~ MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 140510 OVERPAYMENT OF FEES 140511 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 14051~ PARTS & INSTALLATION 140513 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 140514 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 140515 LIBRARY SUPPLIER # 140516 INTERNEl SERVICES 140517 <<< 140518 - 140510 ~ '_- MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINOS # 140519 RECREATION 140520 RECREATION SUPPLIES 1405al BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 1405~ 259 46 15 50 13 O0 30.00 285 74 1,~88 50 43 Oq 4,265.14 5,665.37 i17, 161 2E~ · 055. 37 4, 373 Oft 1, 42]5 600 6 7P 23 (.)(~ 854 1, 015 74 81 50 3, 500 638 23 255 ~.'~, 242 50 59 998 93 75 ~ 9 64 50 ~77 155 700 00 150 O0 56 0o 50 O0 560 244 060 ( 20 3, 680 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON~A LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: ~ RUN [)ATE ¢)&/I &/~ PAGE: V£NDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT ** CHIC½# OVERLAP 31540 HFRITAQE RESEARCH/SUPPORT FOUND. MEETING 14052'3 100 O0 31337 HERNANDEZ° TONY & KAREN RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 1405F'4 500 O0 ~16 HICHSMI~H CO, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1405~5 158 7z ~!50 )~DLID~Y PRiNTiNG PRINTING OF T~ GRAPEVINE 140526 t6, 333 t58 itOLLIDAY ROCK CO , INC MAINTENANCE S~PLIES ~ 1405~7 ;%~53 9t543 HULLIS CO~UTER CORPORATION BUSINESS LICEN~E 1405;'q && C,~ ~414 ill)OR, KARYE REIMBURSEMENT 1405~ l~ 37 485~ HllP~!NS, LORE MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 140530 175 O0 ~1541 H(iW ~ 2-TEK SUPPLIES 1405i)t ~r~ t~l HIWF LUM~ER CO , S M MAINiENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 1405")~) ~)4~, l~t~b HItS CONST~UCI'ION SPECIAL'[IEf~ MAINTFNANCE SUPPLIES 1405'1'l 3~ ,195 tt~DRO-SCAPF PRODUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIE~5 t~ 1405 ~4 3~';:_~ I ~ 4[~54 IDM CORPORAl ION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ff 1405T35 ~], ~34. 9276 I('I DULUX PAINT CENTERS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140536 103 ~ts44 I(5WH HERMOSA, LLC RUSINESS I. ICENSE 1-405~17 P~O '~1'~46 [NF~A-STR))CTi;RE A~Q~E(]ATE~ BOSINESS LICENSE 14()5~)F) / ~/'~& INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSN. MEN'S SOCCER PROGRAM ~ 14053~ 818. 50 1~5~ INI AND EMPIRE STAGES, [_TO TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 1405~0 444 Pb ~,~8;' INLAND INDUSFRIAL MEDICAl_ GROUP PROFESSIONAL ~ERVICES ff 140541 1, 347 OO ')~105 IIH_AND LAWNMOWER VEHICI.E MAINTE~NCE ~ 140542 [77 r4i ~c~8 i~ .AND MEDIAtlUN BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE RESOL ~ t405,1'] 1, 700 ,?7 ?]15 TNLAND WHO[ ESAL[ NURSERY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 14054t ~Js t i~tS~q5 IHTERIOR SPECIALISTS BUSINESS LICENSE ]405~7 ~31 Oo A144 ~) r4SEN, ~IC RECREATION REFUND 14054~ 175 ]~q~l ~))LFY BI.UF l~0OK NEW CAR PRICE MANUAL 14054~¢ 54 -11;'D t~) ; t Y ~OU[PMi:NT VEHICLE SUPPLIE~ 1405F)0 1. []71 l:'t~ ~:lix MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES *l 1/i055l 514 71 FilD47 ~JIUX INDUSIrIAL, INC BUSINESS LICENSE 14055? & ~OgO ~(~N(J, SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140553 ,100 47~4 ~ULI IMAGE INC RECREATION SUPPLIES 140555 38~ :~1548 t PESIQN BUSINESS LICENSE 140556 1F~ 77( 5545 L :~ A ASSOC IAIES, INC PROFESSIONAL 9ERVICES . 140557 ~ t, 417. 1 1075 I A~ SAFELY 5LIPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1405~D 50 3Pt LANDSCAPE west, INC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ~ t40559 lOP, 70'~ 14 5BB4 t II.~URN CORPDRATION PROFESSIONAL ~ERVICE~ fi 14(}5~,O 1, 435 OO 1455 I ()[4(J'S DRUGS FILH PROCESSINQ 140.561 ?'2 qlS, 00 I UN{~WELL INVESTMENTS RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 1405~2 "450 O0 ~00 [ ?; ANOELES TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 140563 33. 1;~ ]4410 MANILA, ROSIE REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES 1405~4 175 O0 -C'Cq 140~5 - 1405~5 D 54~ fiA[4 [ POSA HDR ~ I CULTURAL ENT INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ~ 1405~t~ &O, 045 79 ;'50 HAF~FINEZ TOWINO AND AUIOM[)TIVF VOWING SERVICE~ ~ 140567 IDO ~J'~07 MA~IEN-SOHT, INC PRESORT MAIL SERVICES 14056r] 100 ;~H7] MAT I''S HARDWARE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14056~ 32 Oq ~,~[]3 HAYER, CO~LE & PALMER PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 140570 1,250 C, 0 ~ZI~U MICHAELS STORES INC M3019 RECREATION SUPPLIES 14057i 43 ~8F~2 HIDWE~T TAP~ LIBRARY SUPPLIE~ ~ 1~057m I1~ ~'5~7 MINNESOTA Wt STERN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1405/3 7, ~73. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD! 06-16-99 (~8/99) RUN DALE: 06/16/99 PAOE' 4 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR AMT ** CHECK# OVERLAP 5~1 MODERN ALLOYS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140574 ~98 41 7178 MON;~OE, DIANE REFUND PERS DEDUCTION 140575 1t5.6! 5885 MOR1TA, DUANE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140576 ~,307 O0 '~5"J? NA~ANO FOODS !NC gELEASE OF DEPOSIT 1405'?'7 62 ;'740 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 140578 340 ~©77 NETWORK INSTRUMENTS MAINTENAHCE 14057~ I~ O0 ~057 N)~I'S FLAQ SHOPPE RECREATION REFUND # 140580 ,~ ~ NI~)N-EQLI ~:()UII'MENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1405~t 92 ~,4 4H53 ~)Ct ~ , INC CORE SERVICES CHARQES 140582 <2'C< 140583 -- ) 40583 '~:' ff 140584 ), /40 I~ 1405S5 403 50 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 14058~3 1, 109 BUSINESS LICENSE 140589 46 O) RE IMBURSEMENT~RUPPL I ES 140590 50 00 R E I MBURSEMENT~SUPPL I ES 1405~) 40 00 REIMBURSEMENT-SUPPLIES 1405~2 I 5~ PA~ IN~ SERVICE 1405~3 iJ ¢,;,' RELEASE OF DEPOSIT 140594 5(h} 0u RECREATION SUPPLIES 140595 lbO VEHICLE MAINTLNANCE SUPPLIES 140596 ~)7 ~USINESS LICENSE 14059/ 15 16 EXP~NSE REIMBURSEMENT 1405'~L~ 94 70 CONTRACT SERVICES 14059~ ;'i~7 50 RECREATION REFUND 140600 ~'~ VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 140601 764 57 DUES 140b02 340 O0 PROTECTION SERVICER-I IONS CNTR H 140~(),1 ~0 19 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ff 140~05 54~ OFFICE SUPP!_IE~ 140~0~ J]~! 33 <<< 140~07 -- 140~07 T , VEHICLE MA I NT, SUPPL I ES~zSERV ICE ~ 140~0H E~C>Z VEHICLE MAINr SERVICE&SUPPLIES ~ 14()~0~ 3~6 45 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140h10 3, ~08. 40 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ l~06t 1 312. SOIL TESTIN~ SERVICES 140612 ~0 O0 BUSINESS L ICEN~E REFUND 140613 J7 0 RECREAIION SUPPLIES 140614 37 67 REIMBURSE QrANT FUND8 140615 5, 400, QO0 00 PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUND 140616. ~00 O0 RECREATION REFUNDS 140617 10 O0 RECREATION REFUND M 140618 519 6D ELECTRICAL SUPPC IE~ ) 140619 157 PAR~INQ CITATION FE~ REFUND 1406~0 JO O0 PRINTS ~ 1406R1 ~f, ~:57 TIRE REPAIR 140622 55 O0 M~INTEN~NCE SUPPLIE~ 140~3 141 81 MAINTENANCE REPAIRS ~ 140~4 )56 OIl 1CE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES OMNiTRANS BUS PASSES L)N ('ALL COMPUTER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I)H('iIARD SUPPi_Y HARDWARE P U ! # 9&V2 PA('I HIN, ANDRIW 4t:3C) PEI I OUARD PRIiDUCTS/T AND A ~LACHWR /',/ P~;' HI)YS ]~ 5",O P[Rt URMANCE HONDA SERVICL / REPAIR 4 ~'~ PtI[)DI~, LORRAINE ~,~ 4~ P IR(~N, SHAUN ~OUV PI] IS, LISA 1O4~ PUNUNA VALLEY ~AWASAKI 777~ PPR~C 31SSl PR[l ERRED CEIl INQS, INC f'R)~t)t N[IAL OVI RA[L SUPPLY ~H)A~ T IY ONE ENGRAVERS ;'~,t It * R AUTOMOI IVE , '/0~ F~ t~ F, INC 10~tr) ~ d M DESIQN (.;RE)UP, INC 4(',~!5 F~ ,) SUPPLY CO · ll~ R M A ~ROUP laD~ R V J CONCRETE INC ,.V.4 ~AI pItS QROCERY COMPANY ~?~ RANCHO CUCA RL'DEVELOPMLNF ACENCY I(}5()b RANCHO PACIFIC DEV CORP 10~4 RANDALL, ALAN ~ I ~5 READY MADE 5714 REXEL CALCON FLECTRICAL SUPPI_IES 114¥5 RlPOl Y, QINO V ~7~ RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT ~2'~ R[}IU ES, RAUL P , SR. 1/~ ROIARY CORPORATION 4~4;' ;~UvAI PIPE ~, CUPPLY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD~ 0&-16-~9 (~8/9~) RUN DATE' 06/16/?~ PAOE: ~ VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT, ** CHEC½# OVERLAP 14F}7 5ADDUR1U, SHLt~RI PLAYSCHOOL SUPPLIES 1406~1} 1~0. O0 5745 SAFELITE (;LA.%~, CO~P SERVICE AND SUPPLI~S 140&~ ~= 50 5538 5AN ANI()NIO HATFRIAL5 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 140&~7 ~4~. 77 581 SAN I~RN COUN~' C~L-IO ~RO~NAM 1406~ 1, 300. O0 i381 L;AN DtNN COUNIf ENVIRONMENiAl. PE~MIT/UNDE~Q~OUND STO~AOE TES 1406~0 178. O0 5oi~9 5AN [~UI~H COUN1Y [I~E DEPT'. VNDE~Q~OUND T~N~ 140~31 L'7~ %AN B~PN (F;UN~Y SUN SUBSCRIPTION 14063~ 31. ]3~ 5AN DIIC~ R~'~TANY [mOOP~ CO, ~NC MAINT SUPP[.I~S ~ 140~33 t,51~. 8~ 5088 5ANNA ~I S~PNIN~S, CIlY OF LITERACY P80O8~M 140~34 45. O0 1488 ~]A~, dfu /C~AlIVE ~UILDINO CONCEPT P~RMIT DEPOSIT REFUND 140~35 500 00 ~4~ :d N~NY ; INC~ COMPANY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140~3~ · '~&J5 5~l~)N lP~r4~ ~ ~CA~ ~;N PN~q~UCTS MAINTENANC~ SUPPLIES ~ 140~37 ~33 80 ISZ'~ [~HA~ED ;; (]~ ~ AIRCH~L[~ 1ELECt~M~ INC TELEPHONE SERVICES ~ 140638 3, 15~ ~3 J51 SIGN 5~I(.~P, In~ MAINT SUPPLIES ~ 140639 148. 4513 51M~N ,, %CHU',ilE~ LIBrArY SUPPLIES 140640 107 80 13~'7 [JNA[~l ~ ~ iNAI. DAY C~MP SUPPLIES ~ 140~41 I, ~71 51 ~6 SMIDE~ ~, I~A P~TTY CASH - COMMUNITY SVCS ~ 14064~ ~7 ~6 F~!~ qn CA1 ~; (~A~ Cr~MPANY MONTHLY OAS BILLS ~ 140643 <<< 140~44 - 140~4~ t4";2 :4[)'~IHI ;>l'l ( A( I~ ()~HIA I I'[:'i()H MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS ~ 140647 9, 134. 88 &Z41~ ~,t~L:IHLAND ;ANHt;~% MANM} ~ AJSOC BUSINESS LICENS~ ~EFUND 140648 600 O0 t .~'/'_t %)'1 )!a ': p,':'~$(K' OVERPAYMENT OF PLAN CHECK 140649 300 O0 11[:4,' i;~ATE I-~F/IF~CHJ~-I[NIAL I:ICIIt , INC SERVICE ANO SUPPLIES 140~50 ~0,513 40 i;t,;!&~ %IFil b~!/PK}-Nil ~U DIIMIN5 FOUNDAIION OLDTIMERS ~OUNDATION t4065~ 666 67 a HJZI !,UNN IhL F i~N'P AUTO SERVICE S SUPPLI~S 140653 17 O0 l.~l ~,~'! ~ ~',' Nlh~"~" PUBLICATION ~ 140654 1, 607 t ~,H5 ~;~H - %11~[ I~ h~h :~ql ~1; I)t ~:TNt~CTION DOCUMENT SHREDDIN~ 140655 ~78 O0 1'1~,;4 I/~t~.[ t YOUIH PRO(~RAM & DAY CAMP SUPPL 140656 29. 89 IFLg [a;~';[ i ' ;'[ ( I A; ~'¢ PR~q)';~' ;q MAINT SUPPLIES 140657 1, 781 03 I l>l It ~ ii[ll OFFICE SUPPI_IES 14065'~ ~45. O0 t14'~,7~ TIJ~'I MilK; lttC,tl'A(K Jill ), INC DUSINESS I.[CEN~E REFUND 140661 ~[J O0 ,-~;':~9 'T i ),',ti J;'JJdP;iJ, l,~l FOH~UI AR CfH-H' RECREATION REFUND 140662 150 00 4E~,'~J IIHH'tP, %~hlJl l< {'tF ALIi] [(;MA RECNEAflON SUPPLIES 140663 =~8 43 ,It.,t,i] ~ ', gtt/d-'U~ (IT . IPIC SECURITY gUARD SERVICE 140664 1,025. 03 4H9 ~.~pi ,NND. (t 1Y (H- MONTHLY WATER BILLING 140669 3, 786 O0 14'~1 VAN AWI:]ht IFIIt[4NAIIiJt. IAI ~U~INES~ LICENSE R~FUND5 140670 48. 04 14~ ViI! t~N-IEY[R I_1ADERSHlP SUBSCRIPTION 140671 30. O0 ()a':15 WAr~t~r,l f'ATN11H~; CAPPO MEETIN~ 14067~ 4. 095. O0 ~13 [4/,, ~I, ~III:H t 1N[: CitIH' MAINT SUPPLIES ff 140~73 3,8~0 87 4577 Wtt~ ~; ~At~i;U Gt~ARD Srf~','~,:'T~, SECURITY OU~RD SERVICES 140~74 ~4~. 73 ~,0'~'~ WIll ~At't t~ b' ~, ~tARI) LEGISLATIVE TRIP TO SACTO 140675 355 OO 14'/4 Wll ~ IA!'l';, t,l) l i,(,11[ t~EIMB FOR SUPPLIES ~ 14067~ 43 36 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-16-99 (98/~) VF NI)£)R t4AME RUN DALE. 06116199 ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. GRAFFITI REMOVER RECREATION SUPPLIES VEt4ICLE MAINT SUPPLIES CHECK# OVERLAP 140678 118 53 # 140679 137.39 # 140680 588 64 TOTAL 6,019,48~.94 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA lIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD~ 06-23-99 (98/99) RUN DATE; 06/22/99 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR ANT 2~1 P A P A 5217 PAPER SHOWCASE 31540 10506 11488 4450 5164 H~A~i ~ESEA~CH/SUPPO~T FOUND. RANCHO PACIFIC DEV CORP SAY, JOE/CREATIVE BUILDING CONCEPT AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION C L A 21289 A M BEST COMPANY, INC. I AA EQUIPMENT RENIALS CO., 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 3785 ACTION ART 21293 ADACKAPARA, RANI 21294 ADLAWAN, AIDA 17 21302 1430 40~ a693 la88 667 ~6 803 21304 6240 21290 ~1305 5~4! 4989 ~1~97 74 6~8 2470 21303 4301 INC AIRTOUCH CELLULAR ALPERT'S PRINTIN~ ALTA FIRE EGUIPMENT CO. ALVARADO, MARIA AM/PM MINI MARKET #5996 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS AMERICAN EXPRESS AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES APOLLO SAFETY & INDUSTRIAL ARBOR NURSERY INC ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS BALDY VIEW PUBI_IC/PRIVATE COALITION BARAHONA, CHERYL D. BARR LUMBER RESALE CO. BEST-IN-WEST BEU, ANNE BIDINIAN, CHARLES BMV E~UIPMENT BRYANT, MICHELLE BUCKNAN & ASSOCIATES CALIFORNIA TRANSMISSION CARBON, BEATRICE CHAMPINE, SHARON CHAREST, SHELLY CI]Y RENTALS COLE, ARLENE COLTON TRUC~ SUPPLY COMADURAN, MISTY COMPUSA~ INC ~* CHECK# PESTICIDE APPLICATORS SEMINAR "'~'~ 139922 - SUPPLIES -'"-'~'" 139926 - MEETING <<< 140524 - PERMIT DEPOSIT REFUND <<< 140617 - PERMIT DEPDSIT REFUND <<< 140636 - OFFICE SUPPLIES CALIF LIBRARY ASSOC MTG~ <<( 140683 - OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPtI£~ # RECREATION SUPPLIES R~FUND SECURITY DEPOSIT SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND <CC 140693 - CELLULAR PHONE BILLiNgS # DFFICE SUPPLIES # SERVICE/SUPPLIES SECURITY DEPOSIT REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND DFFICE SUPPLIES # AMERICAN EXPRESS BILLINGS MONTHLY SERVICE # MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 40704 - # VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS PROFESSIONAL. SERVICES CLOUT MEETING # DEPOSIT REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND LIABILITY SETTLEMENT EGUIPMENT RECREATION REFUND CONSULTANT SERVICES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND EGUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # DEPOSIT REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 1407~6 - OVERLAP 139921* 4500- 139925* 267 40- 140522 >30 1405~3 ioO. 00- 140615 >>> 140616 50000- 140634 140635 50000- 140680 140681# 10000 14068~* 35.00 140686 140687 9.90 140688 72.49 140689 140690 275.84 140691 200 O0 140692 200.00 1406~3 140694 a, 538 23 140695 3,232.50 140696 43.89 140697 ~00 O0 140698 46.00 140699 2,640.48 140700 55 O0 140701 789,~0 140702 43562 140703 290.93 140705 140706 2,61483 140707 678. O0 140708 ~000 14070~ 1,050.00 140710 140711 1,61625 140712 38.00 140713 550.00 140714 140715 3500 140716 73~ 50 140717 57 7b 140718 ~00 140719 40 O0 140720 7OOO 140721 64. 52 140722 220 38 140723 140724 250 O0 140725 1,575.31 140726 VENDOR 130 643 ~1~ ~1301 21300 85 6246 ~3~ ~84 6145 1~0 366~7 6064 107 3484 5323 5370 5916 3364 5767 45~4 36698 511 36699 6~41 6140 1144 1082 36700 3356 '36674 3388 1870 6163 65O 137 31566 5699 31567 31568 437 158 3633 1234 495 5882 103 4188 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-~3-~9 NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION RUN DATE: 06/22/~9 PAQE: ~ WARR NO WARR AMT. COMPUTER SERVICE CO COMPUTERLAND COPPOLA, JOSEPH CREATIVE BUILDINg CONCEPT CROOK, CATHERINE CUCAMONgA CO WATER DIST D & J PIANO MOVINg D & K CONCRETE CO DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC DAVIS, SAM DEER CREEK CAR WASH DEI~E, MICHAEL DEPARTMENT ISSUE DETCO DOE JOE'S DOSS TENNIS COURTS E-Z UP FACTORY OUTLET ED BUILDINg MAINTENANCE EIGHTH AVENUE (JRAPHICS ELLISON EDUCA] Iut~AL E~UIPMENT INC ELPERN, BARRY EMBASSY SUITES ERIC~SON~ JODY E]S, INC EXCLUSIVELY VOLVO/VOLKSWAgEN/SUBARU FRAME-ART FRANKLIN COVEY CO FREELAND. KADH!RIN AND gARCIA, VIVIAN ~IURBINOo MICHAEL QO[DFN HEAR AHD(]RI~TG, INC gOLDEN WESl Di51HIBU'IIN~ gOMEZ. RICK gOOD CHEVROLET ~RAINQER. W W QTE CALIFORNIA HALDER, kELLY HARALAMBOS BEVERAGE COMPANY HERR. CHARLES HERRERA, AMANDA HINDERL ITER, de ~ ~AMAS & ASSOCIATES HOLI_IDAY ROC~ CH , INC HOMELESS OUTREACH PROMS & EDUCATION HOSEMAN HYDRCI-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC I C M A REITREMENT TRUST - 401 I C M A RETIRI_MENT TRUS1-457 I D BURR CHECK# OVERLAP SIGNAL MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES FACILITY RENTAL REFUND DEPOSIT REFUND RECREATION REFUND # 140727 9,374 85 1407~8 169. 17 1407~9 54 O0 140730 500.00 140731 5000 -~',F.{ t4073~ - 140733 MONTHLY WATER ~ILLINQS # 140734 10,687.85 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140735 8500 STREET MAINTENANCE # 140736 1, 781 11 OFFICE SUPPLIES # 140737 366.97 CONTRACT SERVICES 140738 607.50 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 140739 98 O0 DEPOSIT REFUND 140740 500 O0 SUPPLIES 140741 339.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14074~ 18.86 MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 140743 1,000 O0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES # 140744 4,~40 O0 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140745 296.26 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140746 4,180,00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140747 179.08 PERSONNEL SERVICES # 140748 3,847 O~ LIBRARY SUPPLIES # 14074~ RECREATION REFUND 140750 124 O0 C.M B. T. A MEETINg 140751 434 50 RECREATION REFUND 140755 DO. O0 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140753 1~9~5. 34 EOUIPMENT 140754 409 80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140755 170. 7~ OFFICE SUPPLIES # 140756 77 45 RECREATION REFUND 140757 DO0 O0 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 140758 ~4. 49 OVERPAYMEN] OF FEES 140759 5,656 85 PROFESSIONAL ~ERVICE8 # 1407~0 30.555 O0 RECREATION SUPPLIES 140761 47 REIMBURSEMENT 140762 1~, 11 RECREATION REFUND 140763 ~0,476 82 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 140764 33.90 <,C< 140765 - 140765 MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS # 140766 7.797 43 RECREATION 140767 llO O0 RECREATION SUPPLIES 140768 216,30 RECREATION 140769 310 O0 RECREATION 140770 80 O0 SALES TAX AUDIT SERVICES # 140771 3~306. 77 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14077~ 44 76 MONTHLY SERVICES 140773 106 O0 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 140774 663. 7~ [.ANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140775 13 65 01 # 140776 5,894 08 DEFERRED COMP 140777 753 O0 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140778 4041 CITY DF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 06-23-99 (98/99) VENDOR NAME ITEM DEBCRIPTION RUN DATE: 06/22/99 PAGE: 3 WARR NO WARR. AMT 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 147I IRON AgE CORPORATION ~47 1T WON'T BYTE 31564 JOHNSON, MICHAEL 4431 JON'S FLAG SHOP 2220 KELLY PAPER COMPANY 5894 KELLY, KRISTY 315~9 KHAWAJA, ZIA 1218 KNOX ~090 KONO, SOPHAK 172 ½OZLOVICH, DEBBIE 31565 KRAMER, JOHN 31570 KRAMER, PATRICK 31557 LA LIFESTYLE 195 LANCE, SOLL & LUNOHARD 31572 LEACH, DARCIE 31554 LEADER TIRE, INC 31573 LEWIS, JERA 31574 LEWIS-DI MARIO, ROBIN 31953 LOCAL. LINK, THE 5662 LOS ANQELES COCA COlA BTL. 31575 LYNCH, JULIE 31458 MACRO PRO 31577 MAGALLON, MARCO 31558 MAIL BOX ETC 31576 MANANSALA, MALCO 31579 MANORAM, JOSH 31578 MANUEL, SACHA 72 MARK CHRIS, INC. 3155~ MAXIMUM ROOFING 21Q8 MICHAELS STORES INC #3019 3860 MOBILE MINI, INC 31~61 MONTGOMERY, MICHAEL 7184 MORRIS, CATHY 6047 MSI 1MAQING 31555 N S LIOU COMPANY 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 744 NATIONAL DEFERRED 31559 NELSON'S OLASS 31563 NELWAN, PAULUS 433 NIXON-£QLI EQUIPMENT 315~0 OCHOA, CARLA 523 31562 365 224 1441 31~60 OFFICE DEPOT OGLE, RICHARD L. OLD QUAKER PAINT COMPANY ORANQE COUNTY STRIPINQ SVC, ORTIZ LIFT SERVICE PACIFIC BEU_. PACIFIC FIRE PHOTECTION CO. INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTIONS SAFETY SHOES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND REFUND PARKINO CITATION FEE RECREATION SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES RECREATION RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT REFUND PARKINQ CITATION FEE RECREATION BUSINESS LICENSE AUDIT SERVICES RECREATION BUSINESS LICENSE RECREATION RECREATION # BUSINESS LICENSE RECREATION SUPPLIES # RECREATION PROFESSINAL SERVICE # RECREATION BUSINESS LICENSE RECREATION RECREATION RECREATION VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE RECREATION SUPPLIES STORAGE SUPPLIES # RELEASE OF DEPOSIT REFUND PENS DEDUCTION RECREATION REFUND BUS!NE88 LICENSE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # DEFERRED COMP BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND PARKING CITATION FEE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # RECREATION # ~?-" 140822 - OFFICE SUPPLIES # REFUND PARKING CITATION FEE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # BUSINESS LICENSE RECREATION REFUND # MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE CHECK# OVERt. # # AP 140779 140780 5,16764 140781 7860 14078~ 7500 140783 177.00 140784 24205 140785 13.58 140786 8.31 140787 20000 140788 3,951 78 140789 480.00 14079O 51.60 140791 107.00 140795 450.00 140793 58.53 140794 10,050.50 140795 24.86 140796 7.50 140797 62.00 1407~8 1750 14079~ 7.58 140800 493.48 140801 140802 ~5. 50 140803 43.12 140804 10.64 140805 200. O0 140806 2500 140807 ~500 140808 204.47 140809 3870 140810 54~.87 140811 261.84 140812 50000 140813 141 17 140814 809.80 140815 ~.oo 140816 140817 D, 1~4. O0 140818 140819 140820 1,379.8& 140821 29 1408~2 1408~3 140824 177 O0 1408~5 ~15 37 140B26 5,361 47 140827 4,20616 140828 54 140829 ~4 72 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD~ 06-23-99 (98/99) RUN DATE: 0&/22/99 PAGE: 4 mm~mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR ANT CHECK# OVERLAP 31582 PALl A, MARLENE RECREATION 140830 62.00 4499 PARR 5PECIALITIES MAINTENANCE SERVICE ~ SUPPLIES 140831 1, 500 O0 31581 PERSONS, TERRY RECREATION 140832 56.00 2987 PHOENIX QROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS MONTHLY SERVICE # 140833 2,991.61 hi48 PXR(~N, SHAUN CONTRACT SERVICES 140834 250.00 6089 PITTS, LISA RECREATION REFUND 140835 ~58 O0 3952 POMONA INL VALLEY CNCL OF CHURCHES WEST END HUNQER PROQRAM 14083~ 9 75 31583 POPE, EVLA RECREATION 140837 22 79 583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES PROTECTION SERVICES-LIONS CNTR # 140838 94.64 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL_ SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 140839 29~ 35 31584 ~URESHI, FATIMA RECREATION 140840 ~00 O0 251 R & R AUTOM0TIVE VEHICLE MAINT, SUPPLIES&SERVICE # 140841 419.79 4713 R C MARKETING CO SUPPLIES 14084~ 1,077. 8~ 345 R D 0 E~UIPMENT CO MAINT SUPPLIES # 140843 520.40 5174 RANCHO CUCAMONOA FAMILY YMCA PROORAM ASSISTANCE PROORAM 140844 80000 5~5 REOULATION COMPLIANCE, INC~ TRAININO SERVICES 140845 ~. 150 55 1149~ REIMER, PATRICK RECREATION REFUNDS 14084& 124.00 11009 RHINES, STEPHANIE RECREATION REFUNDS # 140847 54.86 5&18 RICHARDS, WATSON, & OERSHON LEQAL SERVICES # 140848 44,038.95 11497 RIEBLI JR, ROMAN RECREATION REFUNDS 140849 12~ O0 11498 ROBINSON~ BARBARA RECREATION REFUNDS 140850 6~ O0 59~4 ROQAN BUILDIN~ SERVICES JANITORIAL SERVICE 140851 ~,2~8. 32 16 ROTARY CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14085~ ~5. 86 4704 RUSH~ CHRIS INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 140853 109 75 1149~ S S A IMPORTS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 140854 6.49 11512 SALON EXCELLENCE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 140855 65.00 300 SAN BERN COUNIY REIMB PARKIN~ CITATIONS # 14085~ 3,340 00 1105 SEAL FURNITURE ~ SYSTEMS INC O~FICE SUPPLIES # 140857 1~313 07 4~53 SHA~IMAR TOURS & CHARTER RECREATION TRIP 140858 1.047 21 1829 SHARED TECH FAIRCHILD TELECOM~ INC TELEPHONE SERVICES 140859 144.00 11500 SHARTAU~ SHELLY RECREATION REFUNDS 140860 4~ 75 5950 SHESHUNOFF INFORMATION SERVICES ANNUAL/TST/IMP # 140861 3~2 95 2507 SIEBE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS SERVICE/SUPPLIES # 1408~ 1~,563. 90 351 SIGN SHOP, TH~ MAINT SUPPLIES 140863 14~. 23 11501 SIMONS, D~ D S · SHERWIN L BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 1408&4 12.00 1327 SMART & FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES 1408~5 t43. 7~ 11502 SMITH, DE~IE RECREATION REFUNDS 140866 80.00 ,C,C~C 1408~7 - 1408~7 MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINQS # 140868 MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINQS 1408~9 MONTHLY ~AS BILLS 140870 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 140871 RECREATION REFUNDS # 14087~ TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 140873 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 140874 SHARPS PROQRAM 140875 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 14087~ MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE 140877 RECREATION REFUND 140878 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 140879 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 140880 317 SO CALIF EDISON CO 83,3~9. 74 317 SO CAL. IF EDISON CO. 15, 145. 41 319 SO CALIF ~AS COMPANY 40 00 11503 STANDLEY, ALISON 14.41 11504 STANLEY, DIANE 34.00 90~ STATE OF CA, DEPARTMENT OF ~RANS 21,754.86 5031 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 71~. 50 5281 STERICYCLE, INC 55. 48 11505 SYLVAN LEARNIN~ CENTER 135. ~ 3~4~ TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL P 75.00 6230 TITAN INDUSTRIAL FOOlWEAR CORP. 129.~5 6~44 TOOLS.-R--US 24~. 71 11506 TRUOREEN, L. P 21 37 CIIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIODi 06-~3-~9 RUN DATE; 06/22/99 PAGEi 5 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR AMT. *~ CHECK# OVERLAP 11507 TRUdILLO, VERONICA RECREATION REFUNDS 140881 45.00 11508 TUCKER, D~BORAH RECREATION REFUNDS 140882 345 O0 ~1509 U S A ASSEMBLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 140883 21~05 4558 U S GUARDS CO , INC. SECURITY OUARD SERVICE 140884 786.85 2~58 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION uMP SERvicES # 140885 704.00 3437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES # 140886 803~ 18 391~ UNIGUE CREATIONS RECREATION SUPPLIES # 140887 5, 737. 69 1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE # 140BBB g8.70 1103 VISTA PAINT MAINT SUPPLIES # 140889 1,73~.00 5870 VLSYSTEMS, INC COMPUTER HARDWARE 1408~0 3,375.00 2340 VORTEX INDUSTRIES MAINT SERVICE & REPAIRS 140891 1,349.28 11510 WADDY, SHELLEY RECREATION REFUNDS # 140892 33.36 11511 WARD, JOHN AND MARGARET RECREATION REFUNDS 1408~3 124.00 4002 WASTE MANAQEMENT WASTE MANAGEMENT # 140894 1,090.42 213 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES 1408~5 4577 WELLS FARGO GUARD SERVICES SECURITY GUARD SERVICES # 140896 9~4. 1S 6099 WHITAKER, RICHARD LEGISLATIVE TRIP TO SACTO # 1408~7 510.00 212 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL. SERVICES 140898 509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE # 140899 7,3~0 O0 TOTAL DROPPING PARTNER YES NO APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3737 Main St., Suite 900 Riverside, CA 9250111,, (909) 782-4400 File Number .............. 352872 Receipt Number ......... 1229798 Geographical Code ........ 3615 Copies Mailed Date 4/16/99 Issued Date DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: Name of Business: Location of Business: Number an~ Street City, Sta5e Zip Code County RIVERSIDE EL TARASCO MARKET 8161 W FOOTHILL BLVD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA SAN BERNARDINO Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (If different from premise address) If premise licensed: Type of license YES 2246 FLEETWOOD PL POMONA CA 91767 91730 RECEIVED APR ? 1999 City of Rancho Cucarnor~.~ PJanning Division Transferor's names/license: , License TVDe Transaction TVDe Fee TVDe Master DUD Date Fee R,~PLAC~M~NT SEC. 23817.5 1. 20 OFF-SALE BEER ;~D ORIGINAL ~ YES 0 APR 16,1999 $100.00 : 2. 20 OFF-SALE BEER ;~D ANNUAL FEE NA YES 0 APR 16,1999 $34.00 : 3. 20 OFF-SALE BEER ;~D STATE FINGERPRINTS NA NO 1 APR 16,1999 $39.00 TOTAL $139.00 Have you ever been Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control convicted of a fe]ony? ~O Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? NO Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SAN BERNARDINO Date APR 16,1999 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: {I} He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an executive off'~.cer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application cn its behalf; 12~ that he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; 13] If:hat no person other than the applicant or applicants has any direct cr lndirect interest in the applicant or applicant's buslness to b~!~ conducted under the license(s) for which this application is made; (4) that the transfer application cr proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filled with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for an,/ creditor or transferor or to det!raud or ~njure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn t'..' either the applicant or the ]icensee with no resulting liability to the Department, Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) AGUILAR GERARDO HORTA DURAN RIGOBERTO HERNANDEZ JORGE CUELLAR MEJIA JOSE MARTIN CEJA ABC 211 SiC Attached SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATIONM $t00 ADMIN FEE AND $39. ~,£ #.Jo ~i TO BE CARRIED OVER. COLLECTED ADDTION iONAL APPLIC *~ ABC 211 {4/98) /~7 Cursor will: ~ Zoom In c' Selt~t Property Application: Applicant: Address: Description:: Type 20 (Off Sale Beer and Wine) Gerardo Horta Aguilar; Rigoberto Duran; Jorge Cueliar Hernandez; Jose Martin Ceja Mejia 8161 Foothill Blvd. Existing Meat Market; new owner; transfer of license Site and Surrounding Zoning: Site: North: South: East: West: Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Subarea 1, Specialty Commercial Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Subarea 1~ Office Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Subarea 1, Specialty Commercial and Office Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Subarea 1, Specialty Commercial Foothill Blvd. Specific Plan, Subarea 1~ Specialty Commercial and Office CITY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July 7, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jenny Haruyama, Management Analyst Approval of Comcast Internal Restrueturin[, RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Comcast Cablevision's proposed internal restructuring, which will reorganize its eleven legal entities into its common parent company, Comcast Cablevision Corporation of California, a wholly owned subsidimy of Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. BACKGROUND: As you are aware, Comcast Cablevision provides cable television service to residents living the "Red Hill area,"Iocated on the west side of Rancho Cucamonga. Comcast currently operates four cable systems in California, which are held in the names of eleven different legal entities. To reduce the administrative burden of maintaining these eleven entities, Comcast has chosen to reorganize its structure by merging these eleven entities into their common parent, Comcast Cablevision Corporation of California, a wholly owned subsidiary of Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. As a result of this consolidation, Comcast's name will change from Comcast Corporation of the Inland Valley to Comcast Cablevision Corporation of California. This name change will not impact customers, nor will it change Comcast's local management, facilities or local employment. The internal restructuring is scheduled to take place July 31, 1999. This item is being brought before you for your approval as the City's franchise agreement requires prior written consent of the Grantor (the City) expressed by resolution regarding any merger, consolidation, reorganization or other transaction affecting ten (10) percent or more of the interest in the Grantee (Comcast). g'[spectfully Submitted, at~ g ment A~ Att/achments RESOLUTION NO. 99-147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE INTERNAL RESTRUCTURING OF COMCAST CABLEVISION OF THE INLAND VALLEY, INC. WHEREAS, Comcast Cablevision of Rancho Cucamonga, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Grantee"), is the holder of a cable television franchise issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"); and WHEREAS, the Grantee has advised the City that it wishes to merge with its parent corporation, Comcast Cablevision Corporation of California; and WHEREAS, based on the Grantee's representation that such change is for internal administrative convenience only, the City has no objection to the proposed internal restructuring. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City that: The City hereby approves of the merger of Comcast Cablevision of Rancho Cucamonga, Inc., with Comcast Cablevision Corporation of California provided that such approval is not to be construed as an approval of a transfer of the franchise to any party other than Comcast Cablevision Corporation of California nor a waiver of City's right to approve any further transfer of change in control of the franchise. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 7th day of July, 1999. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk Comcast Corporation Communications, Inc. Con~.~Ho~"~,'nc. I Comcast Cablevision Corporation of California Liquidation of California Legal Entities Into Comcast Cablevision Corporation of California Before Liquidations I Each of these subsidiary corporatiorrs witl be hquh~eted inlo their shareholder Comcast Cablev~$~an Corporation of California of Ft~ant, Im of ktal-~ Emigre, ~'~. Le~c, Inc. 2/ Comcast comcast CaMe Communications, Corporation of Liquidation of California LEgal Entities Into Comcast Cablevision Corporation of California After Liquidations Califomia Cabi Franchises CITY ()F P, ANCI tO CI.,rCAM()N(iA STAFF REPORT DATE: J'ufy 7, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ,lack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer .lorry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ~ff/-~ Michael D. Long, Supervising 1 u[:fiic Works lnspcctor/l[g~ SUBJECT: /~.UTt'IORIZE TII E EXECUTION OF PROGRAM S U I' PIA:,M ENT NO. 001 -M TO THI); ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5420 COVERING THE REALIGNMENT OF CARNE[.IAN STREET FROM VIVERO STREET TO 1000 FEET SOUTIt I;l. ECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the execution of Program Supplement No. 001-M to Administering Agcncy-Stvtc Agreement No. 08-5420, and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the Mayor to sign said agreement. BACK(; IIOUNI)/ANALYSIS: The Carnelian Strcct Realignment pro. jcct quail fics lbr Federal I lazard l';limination Safety funding. The funds arc administered by the Department of Transportation Design and Local Programs and, thcrelbre, the City must execute a supplement to the existing Administering Agency-State Agreement No. 08-5420. Rcspcctlhlly submitted, VO"~am J. ()'Nell City Engineer W.IO:.IAD:Is Attachment: Vicinity Map J EXHIBIT PROJECT LOCATION Anow Ro~ N.T.S. 6~h $tr~ 4th Strut VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 7, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer By: SUBJECT: John Martin, Project Manager Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works lnspector.~,,, APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ADA COMPLIANT DRINKING FOUNTAINS IN VARIOUS CITY PARKS, TO ILAMAZAN CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT $78,068 ($70,968 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NOS. 40-4130-9405; 41-4130-9405, 43-4130-9405, 01-4647-6028, 47-4130-9528, AND 90-4130-9405. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize for execution the contract for the Installation of AI)A Compliant Drinking Fountains in Various City Parks, to the lowest responsible bidder, Ramavon Construction in the amount of $78,068 ($70,968 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Account Nos. 40-4130-9405; 4 I-4130-9405, 43-4130-9405, 01-4647-6028, 47-4130- 9528, and 90-4130-9405. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 8, 1999, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $68,960.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be: complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully suNnitted, Wil aSTa"am J O'Neil City Engineer WJO:JM Attachment ADA COMPLIANT DRINKING FOUNTAINS IN VARIOUS CITY PARKS 1. Hermosa Park 2. Lions Park 3. Demens Rest Area 4. Bear Gulch Park 5. Beryl Park East 6. Beryl Park West 7. Church Street Park 8. Old Town Park 9. Ellena Park 10. Victoria Groves Park 11. Kenyon Park 12. Vintage Park 13. Windrows Park 14. Coyote Canyon Park 15. Spruce Avenue Park 16. West Greenway Park 17. Milliken Park 18. Etiwanda Creek Park 19. Red Hill Community Park 20. Heritage Community Park KF'Y MAP TO CITY MAINTAINF!') FACl! ITIFS ! Immmm m m m~m m ! H1LL51D,E ! I I [] ? m ¥ % Bear Gulch Park B~55 Bear Gulch Place B. Beryt Park East/West 6524 Beryl St/6~0I Camegan St C. Church SLreet Park 10190 Church St D. Coyote Canyon Park 10987 Term V~sta Pkwy E. Heritage Community Park 554e Beryl St. met F. Hermorea Part( 6787 Hermosa Ave G. Uons Park/Community Ctr 9161 Baee Une Rd H. R,C. Neighborhood Center 9791 .N'mw Route I. Red Hill Community Park 748~. Vineyard Ave d. Spruce Avenue Park 7750 Spruce Avenue K, V'mtoria Groves Park 10950 Eme~on L. Wfndrowa Park 6~5H VicioHo Park Lrl Rancho Cucamonga City Haft 10500 Civic Center Drive Public Safety 10510 Civic Center ~ O. Millken Park 7699 Milliken Ave P. Old To~m Park 1~ Feron Blvd Q. Kenyon Park 11481 Kenyon Way R. ~.Intage Park 11745 Victoria Park Lane S. West Greenway Park 7756 Meadowcrest Ct T, Adutt Sporta Complex 8408 Roche~er Awnue U. A~lmql Sheller 117B0 Arrow Highway V. R.C. Public Ubrary 7568 Amhibald Ave 9U~ Street. Yard 91~ 9th Street Bids Opened on June 8, 1999 Item Item No. Description 1 Replace existing Fountain with tlaws #1108 2 Replace existing Fountain with }-laws #3150 Unit of bleasure EA EA Estimated Quantity. 12 18 CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA SUMblARY OF PROPOSALS FOR ADA DRINKING FOUNTAINS AT VARIOUS CITY PARKS Engineer's Estimate = $68,960.00. JDC, Inc. Coons Const. Total Unit Price Bid Unit Price $3,000.00 $36,000.00 $2,432.00 $3,600.00 $64,800.00 $3,233.00 Ramazan Const. Total Total Bid Unit Price Bid $29,184.00 $1,795.00 $21,540.00 $58,194.00 $2,746.00 $49,428.00 TOTAL BID $100,800.00 $87,378.00 $70,968.00 ('I I'Y ()i: b,./\N(.1 I() ( t ;(",.\M( ~h,:( ST AEF R I:!,, I () R 1 DATE TO: I:"R()M B Y: SUB.11;CT: July 7. 199{5} Mayor and Members of the (7it>, Council Jack I,am. AICP. (_'it5.' Manager William ,1. O'Neil. (-;it3' Engineer [,ucinda E. }tackctl, Associate I';ngine~ ..__~ ., ~ Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Wo~:k~"inspcctot~ AWARI) AN I) At 1'1'1 IOI~,IZE '1'I IE EXt¢C[ JTI()N ()F TIIIZ CONTIe, ACT FOR THE (;ONSTRrtJCTI()N OF 1998/99 FY LOCAL STRt;;ET REI1ABII,ITATION, SLt ~RRY SEA1.. TO VALI,I';Y SLtJRRY SEAl, C()MPANY IN THE AMOUNT ()F $190,674.15 ($173,340,14 PLUS 10% CONTINGI'iNCY) TO Bt:i FUNDED FR()M MEASIlRF, I ACCOlJNT NO. 32-4637-9113 I,tECOMMEN I)ATION: It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize tbr execution the contract for the construction of 1998/99 FY Local Street Rehabilitation, Slurry Seal, to Valley Slurry Seal Company in the amount o1'$190,674.15 ($17.3.340.14 plus 10% contingency) to be fi. mded fi'om Measure I Account No..~z-46.~ 7- ) i 1 _,. I:tACKGROUN D/ANALYSIS. Per previous C{mncil action, bids were soliciled, received and opel~cd on June 15, 1999, for the subject pr(~ject. The Engineer's estimate was $ :t 84,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and l~und them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff'has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil ('it5' Engineer WJO:I,EI t/MDI, ls 02¢ OJR'ln, dRJO AREAS F'OR PAVEMENT REHA])ILITATIDN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FY 98/99 PAVEMENTREHABIIJTATION LOCATION MAP N.T.S. , I"~ lj I I,,l.l.l.l.J I I I I J J J l I J J l J J l I J.,I. Jl.l,l.l.,l~jj.,~.~jI ~ rlllllllllllllllllllllllF1,,~_. i z -' © 0 z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 98/99 PAVgMI~NT I:~:HA~IIZTATION ,~..~,,,~.,. , .~- VlCTOmA D~y~=~, ~ ....... ~'--FI I I ~ I :1 - ~IE VISTA ?.Jr Jz . ~-'.. ~,~. ~o~ ~c~ I I1"11111111 lilnlil~l ~t)~!~1' ~SE LINE ROAD · - ~OUND ,.,ONUMEN~'S .'Rm'EC~',N k\\\\~-- Nm A ~'AR* O~ m,S CONm^C~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 98/99 PAVI~111tl~ RIiIHtBILITI,TION FOUND MONUMENTS (PROTECT IN PLACE) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1991)/98 PAVEMENT REHABIUTATION MAP "C" ~ ·- FOUND MONUMENTS (PROTECT IN PLACE) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FY 98/99 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION MAP "D" LOMITA \ BASE LINE ROAD CHURCH __7> PARKHILL ( H£MLOC~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCA34ONGA 1998-99 PAVEMENT REHAB~ATION MAP "E" MT.5. .... L RANCHO ItERITAGE PARK J~G TRAILS .... :Z'COTTONWOOD SUNFLOWER t ,GOLDEN GOLDEN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1998-99 PAVEMENT REHABIIITATION MAP "F" MT,8. DATE: TO: (.,IT3; Ot~ RANCHO (..L(..AMONC~A ST AFF RE PORT ,Jul3,' 7, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Williron J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer iMichael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: .AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CARNELIAN STREET REALIGNMENT AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS, BETWEEN VIVERO STREET AND 1000 FEET SOUTH OF V1VERO STREET, TO ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 1N THE AMOUNT OF $751,847.24 ~$683,497.49 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM GENERAL DRAINAGE ACCOUNTNO. 23-4637-9823 1N THE AMOUNT OF $266,352.37, ISTEA .ACCOUNT NO. 24-4637-9826 IN THE AMOUNT OF $450,000 AND MEASURE I ACCOUNT NO. 32-4637-9826 IN THE AMOUNT OF $35,494.87 RECOMMENI)ATION: It is recommended that the City Council award m~d authorize for execution the contract for the construction of the Carnelian Street Realignment and Storm Drain Improvements, between Vivero Street and 1000 feet south of Vivero, Street, to All American Asphalt in the amount of $751,847.24 ($683,497.49 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from General Drainage Account No. 23-4637-9823 in the amount of $266,352.37, 1STEA Account No. 24-4637-9826 ill the mnount of $450,000 and Measure I Account No. 32-4637-9826 in the amount of $35,494.87. BACKGROUN D/ANALYSIS: Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 15, 1999, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $688,000.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to lneet the requirements of the bid documents. Respeeffu!~y submitted, City Engineer WJO:JAD/MDI:Is Attachment EXHIBIT "A" ~ B~ Lincl~. Foo~ii! Boulemd / PROJECT LOCATION ~Str~ N.T,S. ~ 4dlStl'~ VICIN!ITY M AP J? CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOil CARNELIAN STREET REALIGNMENT Bids Opened on June 15, 1999 Item No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Item Unit of Estimated Description Measure Quantity Mobilization LS 1 Clearing & Grubbing LS Remove AC pvmnt, incl sawcutting SF 58164 Remove guard Rail LF 340 Remove ex C & G, incl sawcutting LF 2877 Excavation (iF) CY 2:208 Fill (F) CY 2901 Abandon & Remove Sewer MH LS I Remove/Abandon CB & CMP EA 2 Remove PCC Trap Channel SF 7575 Construct 0.50' CAB TON 2104 Construct 0.45' AC Pavement TON 1894 Construct AC Berm LF 86 Adjust Water Valves to Grade EA 2 Construct Transition Structure LS 1 78" RCP to 5' X 10' RCB 16 Construct Juncture Struct #4 EA 9 17 Construct Manhole t/2 EA I 18 Reconst Sewer Manhole EA 3 19 Construct PC(; Bulkhead: 78" RCP EA 1 20 Const RC Box, bet Catchbasins LF 85 21 Const 14' CB w/2 Neenah vane EA 18 grates, incl 12" curb, ~nodified local depression and transitions 22 Const Local Depression, gutter LF ,;86 transitions & 12" curb 23 Const 8" PCC Curb & 24" Gutter LF ! 369 24 Const PCC Spandrel & X-gutter SF 1084 25 Const Spec. Design Handicap Rmp SF 258 26 Const PCC [)rive Approach SF 221 27 6" PCC Header LF 713 28 Const PCC sidewalk SF 1058 29 Install 78" RCP LF 293 30 Install 36" RCP LF 1141 31 Install 24" RCP LF 98 32 Constr SCE Street System LF !.300 33 Relocate Irrigation Controller LS I 34 PVC Sleeves LS 35 Traffic Signal Interconnect LF 971 36 Signing, Striping.~ Markings, Etc LS 37 Traffic Control EA 38 histall Firehydrat~t LS 1 39 Remove & Recor~struct 8" W.M. LF 88 Engineer's Estimate = All American Asphalt Total Unit Price Bid $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $28,000.00 $28,000.00 $0.1 I $6,398.04 $6.00 $2,040.00 $3.50 $10,069.50 $10.00 $22,080.00 $11.00 $31,911.00 $300.00 $300.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $0.70 $5,302.50 $19.00 $39,976.00 $32.00 $60,608.00 $5.00 $430.00 $75.00 $150.00 $15,400.00 $15,400.00 $688,000.00 Laird Construction Total Unit Price Bid $49,500.00 $49,500.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $0.25 $14,541.00 $6.50 $2,210.00 $2.50 $7,192.50 $7.50 $16,560.00 $ i 0.00 $29,010.00 $ 1,675.00 $ i ,675.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $1.00 $7,575.00 $12.50 $26,300.00 $28.50 $53,979.00 $15.00 $1,290.00 $50.00 $100.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $1,600.00 $14,400.00 $2,000.00 $18,000.00 $5,000.0(I $5,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $550.00 $1,650.00 $1,350.00 $4,050.00 $1,650.00 $1,650.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 $265.00 $22,525.00 $185.00 $15,725.00 $7,000.00 $126,000.00 $5,895.00 $106,110.00 $40.00 $19,440.00 $ I 0.00 $4,860.00 $14.00 $19,166.00 $13.50 $4.80 $5,203.20 $6.50 $15.00 $3,870.00 $20.00 $8.25 $1,823.25 $5.50 $6.00 $4,278.00 $7.50 $5.00 $5,290.00 $5.00 $255.00 $74,715.00 $275.00 $85.00 $ i 1,985.00 $145.00 $75.00 $7,350.00 $135.00 $5.50 $7,150.00 $10.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $7.00 $6,797.00 $ 10.00 $8,250.00 $8,250.00 $ 12,500.00 $16,500.00 $16,500.00 $50,000.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $2,150.00 $190.00 $16,720.00 $100.00 $18 481.50 $7 046.00 $5 160.00 $1 215.50 $5 347.50 $5 290.00 $80 575.00 $20,445.00 $13,230.00 $13,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,500.00 $9,7 ! 0.00 $12,500.00 $50,000.00 $2,150.00 $8,800.00 Item item Unit of Estimated No. Description Measure Quantity 40 Abandon Ex & Remove Interfering LF 500 41 Portions & Constr 8" sewer LF 40 42 Reconstruct Drop MH EA I 43 Reconstruct Drop Manhole EA I 44 Construct Manhole EA 2 All American Asphalt Total Unit Price Bid $28.50 $14,250.00 $33.00 $ 1,320.00 $1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,850.00 $3,700.00 $683,497.49 Laird Construction Total Unit Price Bid $50.00 $25,000.00 $50.00 $2,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $1,750.00 $3,500.00 $707,878.00 CITY OF RANCliO CUCAMONGA SUMMARY OF PROPOSALS FOR CARNELIAN STREET REALIGNMENT Bids Opened on June 15, 1999 Item Item Unit of Estimated No. Description Measure Quantity I Mobilization LS 2 Clearing & Grubbing LS 3 Remove AC pvmnt, incl sawcutting SF 58164 4 Remove guard Rail LF 340 5 Remove ex C & G, incl sawcutting LF 2877 6 Excavation (F) CY 22:08 7 Fill (F) CY 2901 8 Abandon & Remove Sewer MH LS 9 Remove/Abandon CB & CMP EA 2 10 Remove PCC Trap Channel SF 7575 I 1 Construct 0.50' CAB TON 2104 12 Construct 0.45' AC Pavement TON 1894 13 Construct AC Benn LF 86 14 Adjust Water Valves to Grade EA ;1! 15 Construct Transition Structure LS I 78" RCP to 5' X 10' RCB 16 Construct Juncture Struct//4 EA 9 17 Construct Manhole//2 EA 18 Reconst Sewer Manhole EA 3 19 Construct PCC Bulkhead: 78" RCP EA 20 Const RC Box, bet Catchbasins LF 85 21 Const 14' CB w/2 Neehah vane EA 18 grates, incl 12" curb, modified local depression amid transitions 22 Const Local Depression, gutter LF 486 transitions & 12" curb 23 Const 8" PCC Curb & 24" Gutter LF 1369 24 Const PCC Spandrel & X-gutter SF 1084 25 Const Spec. Design ttandicap Rmp SF 258 26 Const PCC Drive Approach SF 221 27 6" PCC Header LF 713 28 Const PCC sidewalk SF 11)58 29 lnslall 78" RCP LF 293 30 Install 36" RCP LF 141 31 Install 24" RCP LF 98 32 Constr SCE Street Light System LF 1300 33 Relocate Irrigation Controller LS 1 34 PVC Sleeves LS 35 Traffic Signal Interconnect LF 971 36 Signing, Striping, Markings, Etc LS 1 37 Traffic Control EA 1 38 Install Firehydram LS I 39 Remove & Recom;truct 8" W.M. LF 88 Engineer's Estimate = Vance Corporation Total Unit Price Bid $60,000.00 $60,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.25 $14,541.00 $6.00 $2,040.00 $ 1.00 $2,877.00 $15.00 $33,120.00 $2.00 $5,802.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $0.80 $6,060.00 $13.00 $27,352.00 $28.00 $53,032.00 $15.00 $1,290.00 $100.00 $200.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $688,000.00 Gentry Brothers Total Unit Price Bid $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $ 1.00 $58,164.00 $6.00 $2,040.00 $3.00 $8,631.00 $30.00 $66,240.00 $15.00 $43,515.00 $ 1,000.00 $1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2.00 $15,150.00 $15.00 $31,560.00 $32.00 $60,608.00 $10.00 $860.00 $25.00 $50.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $625.00 $5,625.00 $1,500.00 $13,500.00 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $750.00 $2,250.00 $600.00 $1,800.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $900.00 $900.00 $535.00 $45,475.00 $120.00 $10,200.00 $6,950.00 $125,100.00 $7,000.00 $126,000.00 $20.00 $9,720.00 $25.00 $12,150.00 $12.00 $16,428.00 $11.00 $6.50 $7,046.00 $3.50 $15.00 $3,870.00 $10.00 $4.00 $884.00 $3.00 $8.00 $5,704.00 $11.00 $3.50 $3,703.00 $2.50 $2t0.00 $61,530.00 $210.00 $150.00 $21,150.00 $90.00 $140.00 $13,720.00 $80.00 $5.50 $7,150.00 $6.00 $2,700.00 $2,700.00 $22,800.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $3,000.00 $7.50 $7,282.50 $8.00 $11,500.00 $11,500.00 $20,000.00 $70,000.00 $70,000.00 $20,000.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,500.00 $75.00 ' $6,600.00 $60.00 $15,059.00 $3,794.OO $2,580.00 $663.O0 $7843.0O $2 645.00 $61 530.00 $12 690.00 $7 840.00 $7 800.00 $22 800.00 $3 000.00 $7 768.00 $20 U00.00 $20 000.00 $5,500.00 $5,280.00 Itcm Item Unit of Estimated No. Description Measure Quantity 40 Abandon Ex & Re:move Interfering LF 500 41 Portions & Constr 8" sewer LF 40 42 Reconstruct Drop MH EA 1 43 Reconstruct Drop Manhole EA 1 44 Construct Manhole EA 2 Vance Corporation Total Unit Price Bid $35.00 $17,500.00 $35.00 $1,400.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $1,350.00 $1,350.00 $2,800.00 $5,600.00 $737,901.50 Gentry Brothers Total Unit Price Bid $60.00 $30,000.00 $60.00 $2,400.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $1,500.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $770,560.00 q/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 7, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Wait Stickney, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $130,000 FROM MEASURE I (FUND 32 - ACCOUNT NO. 32-4637-9845) AND THE APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (Co 99-060) TO TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE, INC., FOR THE CITY-WIDE PAVEMENT SURVEY AND DIGITAL IMAGING PROJECT TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I (LOCAL) FUNDS (ACCOUNT NO. 32-4637-9845) FOR THE AMOUNT OF $130,000.00 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council APPROPRIATE $130,000 FROM Measure I funds and award and authorize execution ofa Profi2ssional Services Agreement to Traffic Control Service, Inc., for the City-wide Pavement Survey and Digital Imaging project for an amount not to exceed $130,000.00, to be funded from County Measure I (local) funds (Account No. 32-4637-9845). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Each year capital improvement funds are used to rehabilitate streets throughout the City. This rehabilitation could consist of pavement improvements ranging from a slurry seal to an asphalt overlay of the street. In order to best evaluate which treatment is best for which streets and at what estimated cost the City performs a physical evaluation, or inventory, of all the streets wiithin the City. This information is then fed into our pavement management database for analysis. A physical inventory is performed every 5 to 7 years. In the "off" years the pavement management program will approximate a deterioration of the streets. This allows us to make pavement decisions without the need for the inventory. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY-WIDE PAVEMENT SURVEY AND DIGITAL IMAGING PROJECT July 7, 1999 Page 2 This work will also include the stereoscopic photography of all improvements within the street right-of-way. Because this is a stereoscopic photography it will allow the city to later digitize those improvements into our GIS database. This photography will also provide a visual record ofwhat items are within the street rights-of-way. This can be used for design, maintenance, or other purposes. This project will inventory and photograph all the public streets within the City. The pavement inventory will be pertbrmed using optical lasers to detect the different types of cracking and other pavement distresses. The stereoscopic photography, which is tied to the Global Positioning System will allow lbr the future digitizing of those street right-of-way improvements. Respectfully submitted, W~,~m J. O'N'eil City Engineer WJO:WS:dlw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT I)ATF,: July 7, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICI', City Manager FROM: Will iam J. ()' Nci 1, C'ity Engineer BY linda R. Beck..It. Engineer SUBJECT: RELEASE THE MAINTENANCE BOND FOR 5291 SAPPHIRE STREET, SUBMITTED BY JAMES A. BROWN AND J()YCE BROWN RECOMMEN!IATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Trust Deed retained as a Mnintcnance Bond tbr 5291 Sapphire Street. !IACKG ROUNI}/ANA LYSIS: The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain l}cc tkom dclbcts in materials and workmanship. I)cvclopcr: ,lames A. Brown aml Joyce Brown 8320 Vicara Drive R. ancho Cucamonga. CA 92701 Release: Trust Deed retained as Maintenance Bond Rcspcctfi. tlly submitted, ./,' /," . A ' Wil I~'Nm J. £'ity linginter WJ():I,RB:Is City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department 5291 Sapphire Street Almond Street 5291 Sapphire Street Vicara Drive Hillside Road NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT I)ATE: July' 7. 1999 T(): Mayor and Mclnbers of tile ('ity Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becket'. Public Works Inspector 11 ("!,,~/') SIIB.It~C1k RI:::,LEASI~ 'ITII:; FAITHFUI~ PERFOI~,MANCE BOND HELD AS A MAINTENANCF, BOND FOR TRACT 13753, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST C()I,[NI~R, ()F 13ASE LINI,; ROAD AND MILIAK[.;N AVI.!N[I[~ tIECOMMENDATION: It is rccommc~ded that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Bond lbr Tract 1375,.3. BACKGI/O[I NIl/ANALYSIS: Tile required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street iml:)rovements remain free from dclk2cts ill materials and worl~.manship. Developer: I~ewis Itomcs of Calilbrnia P.(). Box 607 Upland, CA. 91785 Release: Maintenance Bond Respecttkd ly sabmittcd. William J. Lily t.h~ginccr 229701S in tile amount of $48,308.90 ~,.'. ():LB:Is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP TRACT 13753 N CI'I'Y ()F RANCI IO C J ' ) t CAM( NGA STAFF REPORT D A'[ E: TO: 1: RO M: BY: SUBJECT: Jnne 28, i 999 Mayor and Members of the City Council .lack l.,am. AICIL City Manager William .I. O'Neil. (?it3' Engineer '7) (alhy Becker. Public Works Inspector 11 RI:.:,LEASE TIlE MAINTENANCE BONI), NUMI3ER 420092S, FOR TRACT 15732. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE L1N E ROAD AND ETIWAN DA AVENUE lIECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Cily Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond. BACKGROIINI)/ANALYSIS The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain [¥ee from defects in malerials and workmanship. DIZVELOPEt;?~' l,cwis Homes f!nterprises, A California General l~al'tnership Box 607 IJpland, CA. 91785 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond 4200092S in the anlount of $86,547.00 Respectfifily submitted, "-4'-(:" ,,';'4-'&u/ W~llmm J. ()'Nci[ City Engineer ~,'. O:£ B:ls CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY MAP TRACT 15732 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRACT 15732 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG/ STAFF REPORT DATE: July 7, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: iRick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner SUBJECT: TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CENTRAL PARK RECOMMENDATION That the City Council review and approve the recommendation as proposed by the Task Force, and if in concurrence, direct staff to prepare the necessary resolutions for a special election and formation of a Community Facilities District. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At the June 15th Central Park Workshop, there was discussion between the City Council and the Task Force regarding a preferred development option for the Central Park project. (See attached report dated June 15, 1999) The Task Force made a formal recommendation to the City Council for a city-wide ballot measure that would occur this Fall and would create a Community Facilities District to collect a Special Tax for a period of 30 years, with an annual assessment of $129.00 per parcel for development and maintenance of the park, pool complex, tennis complex, and open space. In addition, the Task Force felt that certain provisions should be included as a part of the ballot measure such as fee waivers for residents, provisions for a citizen's oversight: committee and a sunset clause for the term of the capital portion of the bond. City Council directed staff to set a Public Hearing for citizen discussion and City Council action. If the City Council concurs with the recommendations of the Task Force, and desires to move forward in the Central Park development process, it is necessary to direct staff to prepare the following resolutions for Council action at the July 21st City Council meeting: · A Resolution of Intention to Establish a District, Approve Boundary Map, Fix a Time and Place For a Public Hearing · A Resol,,~ia~ Of Formation of a District, and Providing For a Special Tax ReI · Ric5 Corurnm [ Director ~,~ D:~knncguirc\capparks\ccntp atk\ccstaffT-99 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: June 15, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Central Park Subcommittee FROM: BY: SUBJECT: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner _CENTRAL PARK - RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION If it is the Council's desire to proceed with the ballot election, based on either a Task Force re'commended preferred project alternative and corresponding assessment amount, or a City Council modified alternative and corresponding assessment, staff can develop the necessary material in preparation for an upcoming ballot measure either in the Fall of I999 or Spring of 2000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Consultant Survey At the February 16~ Central Park Task Force meeting, Gary Lawrence, of Lawrence Research, in conjunction with Adler Public Affairs, presented the results of the Focus Group Research. Although qualitative in nature, focus groups are designed to uncover awareness, themes and concerns regarding a particular issue, as well as, provide insights into the emotions people bring to the issue. Lawrence Research conducted two 2 - hour sessions with Rancho Cucamonga property owners. The focus group participants were given both written and visual descriptions of the plans for Central Park. Overall, their reaction was positive but cautious, mainly because of concerns about cost. With the completion of the Focus Group Research, Adler Public Affairs and Lawrence Research prepared for the city-wide random telephone survey. Lawrence Research conducted the telephone survey in late March and subsequently presented the results to the Central Park Task Force at their meeting on April 20th. This random telephone, city- wide survey provided resident's opinions on components of the adopted master plan of facilities and possible corresponding public assessment for the construction and maintenance of these park facilities. In summary, of those surveyed, 1) 86% believe that the Park and Open Space component, which includes picnic areas, play areas, lakes, walking paths, outdoor amphitheater and open fields for informal games, would be either "critical or nice to have"; 2) 77% believe that a swimming complex is either "critical or nice to have" in conjunction with the open space component, and 3) 68% believe that a gymnasium with exercise and sports facilities is highly desirable also, in conjunction with the CITY COUNCIL/TASK FORCE WORKSHOP CENTRAL PARK RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE June 15, 1999 Page 2 open space component. Intense support for all components except parks and open space dropped markedly when prices for the various components were mentioned. In particular, the Central Library component, which was deemed critical to have by 69% of the residents surveyed, dropped significantly in desirability when the price tag was mentioned with an equal number of residents finding it "nice,. but not really needed". Several combinations of components, including its respective annual assessment, were tested. These combinations ranged from a package that would include just the park and open space priced at $90 per year to the full Central Park plan of community center, performing arts center, library, parking structure, gymnasium, pools, courts, grounds, park and open space for $900 per year. Depending upon whether the measures were read from smallest to largest or vice versa, the support for just park and open space at $90/parcel, ranges from a minimum of 56% to a high of 74%. Support for a fully built-out Central Park at $900/parcel, ranges from 14% to 39%. The annual dollar amount per parcel most acceptable to those surveyed ranged from $90 - $150/parcel. The following Chart I, references the most desirable components and their related development and potential assessment costs. Chart I Central Park Master Plan Survey Summary of Cost for The Most Desirable Components FACILITY Park and Open Space Park/Open Space with Pool Park/Open Space/Pool and Tennis Park/Open Space/Gymnasium Park/Open Space/Tennis/Gymnasium Park/Open Space/Pool/Gymnasium Park/Open Space/Pool/Tennis/Gymnasium COST (millions) $16,950,000 $22,000,000 $24,360,500 $34,689,500 $37,050,000 $39,739,500 $42,100,000 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT $90.00/parcel $117.00/parcel $129.00/parcel $184.00/parcel $196.00/parcel $211.00/parcei $224.00/parcel Task Force Recommendation At the May 18* Task Force meeting, those members present selected a preferred development option for the Central Park project. Of the 12 Task Force members present, 9 members felt that the recommended option for a ballot measure should include the park, open space, pool complex, and the tennis complex, with the balance of the site to be rough graded and hydroseeded with a ground cover to provide a completed park look for an annual assessment of $129.00 per parcel. CITY COUNCIL/TASK FORCE WORKSHOP CENTRAL PARK RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE June 15, 1999 Page 3 Policy issues to be considered: · Should there be a ballot measure? · What should the ballot measure contain, and what is the suggested annual assessment? · When should the ballot measure occur? Should there be a ballot measure? In order to finance both the construction and operations and maintenance of' Central Park and its ancillary facilities, the City will need to use long term debt financing using either General or Special taxes and assessments which require voter approval for either 20 or 30 years. What should the ballot measure contain? Because bond financing is anticipated, there will be annual costs associated with debt service for the construction and initial, one-time start up cost, as well as the annual operations, maintenance and capital reserves needed for the project. When the bonds are paid off for the capital portion of the park, the tax would be reduced accordingly to cover the remaining operations and maintenance cost. Staff researched and analyzed the available tax and assessment methods and recommended the establishment of a city wide Community Facility District (CFD) as the preferred method of special tax. per parcel. This recommendation is based on the inability of the General Obligation and the Assessment District to facilitate the different types of revenue for both construction and operations /maintenance needed for this project. This type of potential funding source requires a two-thirds majority vote of registered voters in comparison to the special assessment weighted ballot as required by Proposition 218. This election can occur any time during the year. On Page 4, Chart II describes the related component parcel tax and its corresponding bond proceeds, and total tax proceeds for both 20 and 30 year terms. When should the ballot measure take place? Over the past few weeks, the consultants, Adler Public Affairs and Lawrence Research, as well as staff, have been discussing the "windows of opportunity" for a ballot. The following is a summary of the pros and cons regarding these options: CITY COUNCIL/TASK FORCE WORKSHOP CENTRAL PARK RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE June 15, 1999 Page 4 Chart II Central Park Tax Rate Analysis Estimated Bond Proceeds - 20 Year Term Per Parcel Amount Used for Tax Debt Service $90 $36 $117 $47 $129 $52 $184 $74 $196 $78 $211 $84 $224 $90 Estimated Bond Proceeds 20 Total Amount for Total Amount for Year Term Debt Service O and M $16,550,000 $1,350,072 $2,025,108 $21,575,000 $1,755,094 $2,632,640 $23,815,000 $1,935,103 $2,902,655 $34,065,000 $2,760,147 $4,140,221 $36,295,000 $2,940,157 $4.410,235 $39,105,000 $3,165,169 $4,747,753 $41,515,000 $3,360,179 $5,040,269 Total Tax Proceeds $3,375,180 $4,387,734 $4,837,758 $8,900,368 $7,350,392 $7.912,922 $8,400,448 Central Park Tax Rate Analysis Estimated Bond Proceeds - 30 Year Term Per Parcel Amount Used for Tax Debt Service $90 $36 $117 $47 $129 $52 $184 $74 $196 $78 $211 $84 $224 $90 Estimated Bond Proceeds 30 Total Amount for Total Amount for Year Term Debt Service O and M $19,840,000 $1,350,072 $2,025,108 $25,860,000 $1,755,094 $2,632,640 $28.540,000 $1,935,103 $2,902,655 $40,810,000 $2,760,147 $4,140,221 $43,485,000 $2,940,157 $4,410,235 $16,820,000 $3,165,169 $4,747,753 $49,745,000 $3,360,179 $5,040,269 Total Tax Proceeds $3,375,180 $4,387,734 $4,837,758 $7,350,392 $7,912,922 $8,400,448 Assumptions: 37,502 parcels as of June 1, 1999 A1 rating on bonds issued Interest rates as of June 1, 1999 holding to date of issue No reserve fund due to O and M coverage Idol/central park/central park bond analym$, 20yr...120-30 year compariao~ CITY COUNCIL/TASK FORCE WORKSHOP CENTRAL PARK RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE June 15, 1999 Page 5 Fall 1999 Pro Maintain momentum of process May have more positive results since public will not be focused on proposed ballot measures for primary election Spring 2000 Provide more time for grass roots organization formation Provides more time for community education process Con Limited time for grass roots group to organize and gather funds ** Limited time for community education process Election results could be affected by proximity of Christmas and payment of property taxes Slack in project momentum Proximity to state elections and open primary could adversely affect results Election results could be adversely affected by payment of property and income tax Proximity to City elections Note: * A Spring Election could be held either before or after the March Primary. However, the consultants believe that anytime after January 2000, there will be a lot of emphasis on those. issues/ballot measures (i.e. Bond issues) associated with the primary, which could adversely affect the desired results for the project. ** The amount of funds necessary to support a public information campaign for the support of a ballot measure is limited by the amount of time available to collect contributions. Proposed Central Park Design/Development Schedule The following proposed time line reflects the major design and development milestones of the project, as well as completing the environmental review process. Timing may vary depending on the option selected for development. I. Environmental Review (12 Months) H. Design Development Phase (4-8 Months) · Review of Previously Prepared Schematic Plans for the Sports Center and Determination of Modifications for Consultant's Design Development Plan Preparation, culminating in adoption of the Design Development Concept: 5.5 CITY COUNCIL/TASK FORCE WORKSHOP CEN~ PARK RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE June 15, 1999 Page 6 HI. IVo · Presentation to Workshop Park and Recreation Commission · Planning Commission · City Council Plan Preparation · · · · · · · · Consn'ucfion Phase · Advertise Project · Bid Opening · C',ity Council Award of Project · 2 Year Construction Project · Completion of Project · Acceptance of Project by City Council · Notice of Completion Filed (16 Months) Preparation of Plans and Specifications for consm~tion of Phase I Begin Working Drawings I st Plan Check 2nd Plan Cheek 3rd Plan Check Plan Approval and Acceptance Park and Recreation Commission City Council - Acceptance of Plans and Authorization to Advertise For Bids (~4 Months) Attachments: Central Park Development Options D:eapgarks:eenlga~Mimhp6.15.99 PARK/OPEN SPACE POOL AND TENNIS I)ESi(,N I)EVI~I_,OP51EN'I RANCHO CtlCAMONGA CENTRAL PARK ("!~!'5 O!: RANClIO CUCAMONGA *FtJTtJRE SITES TO BE ROUGH GRADED AND tIYI)R()SEEDED DE51t;~ DEYELOP511LNI' 11_,I_,IJS'i"!tAI'IV'E RANCHO CUCAMONGA CENTRAL PARK CIq'Y O1: RANClIO CUCANIONGA ~ 'ENq it:l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 7, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. -A public hearing to consider certifying the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for a proposed project known as the Victoria Arbors Village on 291.8 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community generally bounded by Base Line Road, future Victoria Park Lane, future Church Street, future Day Creek Boulevard, Foothill Boulevard, and the Day Creek Channel- APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 30, and 36; 222-201-33; 227-161-33, 35, 36 and 38; 227-171-1, 11,12, and 14. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends certification of the EIR. BACKGROUND On May 26, 1999, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to review the adequacy of the EIR. The Commission, after taking pubic testimony, found that the EIR has been prepared in compliance with CEQA and recommended certification. Attached is Exhibit "B," a copy of the Commission Staff Report. The Commission's hearing on the proposed project, and the related land use amendments, was continued to the July 14, 1999, meeting, as requested by the applicant. ANALYSIS Purpose of an EIR: The purpose of the EIR is to inform the public about any significant impacts to the physical environment resulting from a project, identify ways to avoid or lessen the impacts, identify alternatives, and promote public participation. Contents of the EIR became a planning tool for the Council to use in determining the appropriate and best land use arrangement for the project area and for the entire City. According to CEQA, once the EIR is complete, the City is required to make the determination of certifying the EIR and approving or denying the proposed project (the related land use amendments) within one year. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 July 7, 1999 Page 2 Public Input and Planning Commission's Discussions: At the public hearing, the Commission received input from a resident, Mr. John Lyons, and a representative of the Nichiren Shoshu Temple, Mr. Mike Robbins, regarding the EIR. Comments from both speakers centered on the related land use amendments. Mr. Lyons stated he is against any land use changes and suggested a tand use moratorium. Mr. Robbins stated that the Temple is against any changes of their site from Office to Residential as indicated in one of the land use alternatives contained in the EIR. He also stated that he is concerned with the incompatibility of single family homes around the temple site. A letter, as shown in Exhibit "C" was received from a resident of the Etiwanda community, Mr. ,James Banks, who also is not in favor of the related land use amendments. The Commission, after taking in the public testimony, found that the EIR has been processed and prepared in compliance with CEQA. However, the Commission raised concerns with the related proposed project. The Commission stated that the proposed project would have to stand on its own merit at the scheduled public hearing. The Commission then concluded that they can recommend certification of the EIR to the Council. Detailed descriptions of the identified environmental impacts, mitigation, and monitoring program are contained in Exhibits "A" and "B." FACTS FOR FINDINGS The Planning Commission recommends the Council make the findings and conclusions as contained in the attached Resolution for certification. CORRESPONDENCE The item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted with three 4 by 8-foot public hearing signs, and notices were mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet around the project site~ Also, key community representatives and residents of the Victoria Planned Community and Etiwanda Community have been sent notices of this public hearing. City Planner BB:NF:taa Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Final EIR Exhibit"B" - Planning Commission Minutes and Staff Report dated May 26, 1999 Exhibit"C" - Resident Letter dated April 29, 1999 City Council Resolution Certifying EIR FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01 AND ESPA 98-01 TRANSMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER ON JUNE 17, 1999 EXHIBIT "A" EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01 AND ESPA 98-01 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AND MINUTES DATED MAY 26, 1999 EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: May 26, 1999 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner Duane Morita, Contract Planner Lynn Calvert-Hayes, Environmental Consultant ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A public hearing for a proposed project to be known as the Victoria Arbors Village on 291.8 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community, generally bounded by Base Line Road, future Victoria Park Lane, future Church Street, future Day Creek Boulevard, Foothill Boulevard, and the Day Creek Channel - APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 30, and 36; 222-201-33; 227-161-33, 35, 36, and 38; 227-171-11, 12, and 14. Related file: Eftwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01. (A,) Land Use changes for the following areas: Subarea 1: Subarea la- from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Community Facilities to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7.67 acres of land, generally located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of the winery; and consideration of alternative land use designations of Community Facilities. Subarea lb - from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Park, and School for approximately 57.40 acres of land, generally located east of future Day Creek Boulevard and 600 feet south of Base Line Road; and the consideration of alternative land use designations of Community Facilities for the northeast side of the subarea, immediately east of the winery. Subarea lc - from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 21.13 acres of land for the area generally located south of Base Line Road and east of future Victoria Park Lane; and consideration of retaining the Low-Medium Residential designation. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 2 (B) (D) (E) Subarea ld - from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), Regional Related Office/Commercial, and Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 39.45 acres of land, generally located on the north side of future Church Street and east of future Day Creek Boulevard; and consideration of alternative land use designations of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre). Subarea le - from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Regional Related Office/Commercial to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 13.76 acres of land, generally located north of future Church Street, west of future Victoria Loop Street; and consideration of alternative land use designations of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre). Subarea 2 - from Regional Related Office/Commercial to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 53 acres of land, generally located on the west side of future Day Creek Boulevard, north and south of future Church Street; and consideration of retaining the Regional Related Office/Commercial designation. Subarea 3- Re-align the boundaries of the Victoria Community Plan to inctude approximately 26 acres of land from the Etiwanda Specific Plan, generally located on the north side of Church Street and the west side of Eftwanda Avenue; and a request to change the land use designation from Office to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and consideration of alternative land use designations of a mix of Office and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and consideration by the City of retaining the area in the Etiwanda Specific Plan with an Office designation or a mix of Office and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). Amend the Circulation and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General Plan. Amend various graphics and text for the Victoria Community Plan. Consideration by the City of alternative sites for Park and School within the project area of the Victoria Community Plan. Modify the permitted and conditionally permitted uses and various development and design standards for Regional Related Office/Commercial, Regional Center, and Community Facilities of the Victoda Community Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PlAN AMENDMENT 98-01 - AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A request to re-align the boundaries of the Etiwanda Specific Plan by re-designating approximately 26 acres of land, generally located on the north side of Church Street and the west side of Eftwanda Avenue to the Victoria Community Plan; and consideration by the City of retaining the area in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and retaining the ~and use designation of Office; and consideration of alternative land use designations of a mix of Office and Low-Medium Residential (4- 8 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 227-171-11, 12, and 14. Related file: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01. ABSTRACT: This is a public hearing for the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) as part of the required 45-day public review period after a Notice of Completion and Availability for Public Review of the Draft EIR was advertised in the newspaper. For this hearing, the Planning Commission should review the report, receive public comments, conclude the public hearing, discuss, and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding EIR certification. BACKGROUND: The applicant, American Beauty Development Co., first contacted the City in July of 1997 and informed staff of their property ownership of Victoria Lakes. As a result of reviewing their preliminary development concepts, staff determined that the proposed changes in land use, circulation, open space, and park were significant and would require an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and multiple land use amendment applications. In January of 1998, the applicant formally submitted their General Plan, Community Plan and Eftwanda Specific Plan Amendment applications. After selecting LSA, Inc. as the City's consultant, preparation of the EIR commenced in April of 1998. The Draft EIR was completed last December and circulated for public review. Because additional land use impacts and feasible land use alternatives were identified, the land use and alternatives sections of the Draft EIR were revised and re-circulated on April 1, 1999 with the public review period ending on May 17, 1999. ANALYSIS: Purpose of an EIR: The purpose of the Environmental Impact Report is to inform the public about any significant impacts to the physical environment resulting from a project, identify ways to avoid or lessen the impacts, identify alternatives, and promote public participation. Contents of the EIR become a planning tool for the Planning Commission and the City Council to use in determining the appropriate and the best land use arrangement for the project area and for the entire City. According to the State Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), once the EIR is completed, the City is required to make the determination of certifying the EIR within one year. Staff would like to stress that the certification of an EIR would only mean that the EIR is adequate and in compliance with CEQA. The certification of an EIR does not mean or imply support or approval of the proposed project. The proposed project must be reviewed on its own merits. The Draft Final EIR consolidates the first and the re-circulated draft EIR's into one document, is listed as Exhibit "A" and is a separate document from the staff report. EIR Process for GPA 98-01, VCPA 98-01, and ESPA 98-01: The EIR has been processed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 4 Notice of Preparation (NOP): A NOP for the EIR was prepared by the City and distributed on April 27, 1998. The NOP, describing the proposed applications and land use amendments and issues to be addressed, was distributed to the State Clearinghouse, responsible agencies, and other interested parties for a 30-day review period. The objective for distributing the NOP is to identify and determine the full range and scope of environmental issues of concern so that these issues could be fully evaluated in the EIR. Comments received during the NOP process have been addressed in the applicable sections of the EIR. Public Scoping Meeting: The City held a noticed Public Scoping Meeting at the City on May 12, 1998. Responsible agencies, property owners within 1,000 feet around the project site, and key community representatives were invited to attend the meeting. Besides members of staff, consultants, and applicant, a total of 12 residents attended the meeting. Four of the residents were high school students, who attended the meeting for a school project. The remainder attendees were from the residential area west of the Day Creek Channel and east of Rochester Avenue. The intent of the Public Scoping Meeting was to receive public testimony on those issues that the public would like to have addressed in the EIR as related to the project and environment. The three primary issues raised by the attendees at the meeting were parkland, school, and traffic impacts. Draft EIR Circulation, Notice of Completion, and Notice of Availability: The Draft EIR was completed on December 18, 1998, and circulated according to CEQA requirements with the 45.day public review period ending on February 9, 1999. The Notice of Availability for public review was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on December 18, 1998. A copy of the Draft EIR was made available to the public at the City Planning Division and Library. A total of five agencies provided written comments on the Draft EIR. They are: Southern California Association of Governments; Governor's Office of Planning and Research; State Department of Conservation; California Department of Transportation (District 8); and South Coast Air Quality District. No comments were received from the general public. Our consultant, LSA, prepared responses to each environmental-related comment received, which are included in the Draft Final EIR. Re-circulated Draft EIR, Revised Notice of Completion, and Revised Notice of Availability: During the 45-day public review period for the Draft EIR, based on discussions at the workshops with the Planning Commission and the applicant, there were additional land use issues and impacts identified that needed further analysis. As a result, the land use, the alternatives, and the biological resources sections of the Draft EIR were revised. According to CEQA, the proposed revisions necessitated the re- circulation of those revised sections of the Draft EIR. The following summarizes the changes: The Land Use section was revised to better discuss the project's land use compatibility with the adjacent Filippi Winery located on Base Line Road, the Nichiren Shoshu Buddhist Temple located on Etiwanda Avenue, and the future planned regional commercial center south of Church Street. Additionat mitigation was provided to reduce the project's impacts on land use compatibility. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 5 The Alternatives section was revised to better discuss the reasons those particular alternatives were evaluated in the Draft EIR. Also discussed was the reason an alternative location to the proposed project was not evaluated in the document. A new Alternative 5 was also added which included a Special Overlay District in the area of the historic winery property to provide better buffering between future residential and commercial uses west of Day Creek Boulevard and south of Church Street. The Biology section was revised to analyze the impacts associated with retaining the 0.97-acre wetland on site. The applicant has obtained a Nationwide 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which allows retention of 0.97 'acres of wetland onsite. The Summary of Impact section was revised to correct typographical errors that were made with the Draft EIR. New land use and biological mitigation measures were also included. The revised Draft EIR was completed and re-circulated on April 1, 1999, according to CEQA requirements with the 45-day public review period ending on May 17, 1999. A Notice of Completion of the Revised Draft EIR was filed with the State Clearinghouse and the Notice of Availability for public review was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on April 1, 1999. A total of five agencies provided written comments on the re-circulated Draft EIR, including Southern California Association of Governments; Governor's Office of Planning and Research; California Department of Conservation; California Department of Transportation (District 8); and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services. No comments were received from the general public. Again, our consultant has prepared responses to each environmental-related comment received, which are included in the Draft Final EIR. Mitigation Monitoring Program ¢MMP): In compliance with CEQA, the City has prepared a monitoring program as shown in Exhibit "D." The MMP is a reporting program which identifies each adopted mitigation or required change in the project design that reduces the significance level of a particular impact. The MMP indicates responsibility and timing milestones for each mitigation measure. Statement of Facts and Findings: CEQA states that the City cannot approve any project for which an EIR was prepared which identifies one or more significant effects unless certain findings are made and statement of facts are considered. A Statement of Facts and Findings has been prepared for this project as shown in Exhibit "E." Statement of Overriding Considerations If significant unavoidable environmental impacts result with a project, the City must balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts, the City may adopt a statement of its view that the significant unavoidable adverse impacts are acceptable because of overriding concerns. A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared for this project as shown in Exhibit "F." PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 6 Summary of Significant Impacts and Mitigation: This section describes and summarizes potentially significant impacts resulting with the proposed project and those mitigation measures being recommended to reduce the level of significance for each impact as shown in Exhibit "C." 1. Land Use: Impacts: The proposed residential project is incompatible with surrounding commercial land uses including the Filippi Winery, the Nichiren Shoshu Temple, the future regional mall, and the adjacent 1-15 freeway. Mitigation: The EIR finds that implementation of noise and aesthetic mitigation measures, however, can reduce any potential incompatibility to an insignificant level. Examples of mitigation measures are: 8-foot high sound walls and/or earthem berms, 20-foot wide parkway landscape buffers, additional 25-foot setbacks from the property boundaries for dwellings, etc., The detailed description of the mitigation is listed in Exhibit "C." The EIR finds that the mitigation measures can provide the buffering between the incompatible land uses Impacts: The project conflicts with the land use, open space, and design concept of the Victoria Lakes Village in the Victoria Community Plan, which shows 26 acres of lakes open space on site. Mitigation: The EIR, however, finds that implementation of public services and aesthetic mitigation measures can reduce any potential conflict to an insignificant level. The detailed description of the mitigation is as listed in Exhibit "C." Impac!: The project creates a residential "island" within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and creates a "sandwich" effect of residential zones between commercial zones within the Victoria Community Plan. Mitigation: Again, the EIR finds that implementation of air quality, noise, public services, and aesthetic mitigation measures as listed in Exhibit "C" can reduce any potential impact to an insignificant level. Staff Comment: Although the EIR finds that there are mitigation measures that can reducE; the negative impacts and provide the buffering between incompatible land uses, staff believes that the approach is contrary to the goals and objectives of the General Plan, which states that land use shall be organized to avoid creating conflicts and nuisances. In analyzing the land use amendments, which will be reviewed and considered by the Commission at the June 9, 1999, meeting, staff believes that the current plan for the project site is far superior environmentally and riscally than the proposed plan (project), where a Statement of Overriding Considerations would not be needed. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 7 2. Traffic and Circulation: Impact: The project will have an increase in traffic. A Traffic Study was prepared, which concludes that the following key intersections and freeway interchanges are impacted, which need improvements: Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard Victoria Park Lane/Base Line Road Eftwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue Eftwanda Avenue/Victoria Street Eftwanda Avenue/Base Line Road Eftwanda Avenue/Church Street-Miller Avenue Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Eftwanda Avenue/Arrow Route Eftwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue East Avenue/Base Line Road Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road 1-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road 1-15 Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road $R-30 Eastbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue $R-30 Westbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue 1-10 Eastbound - LA County line to Citrus Avenue 1-10 Westbound - LA County line to Citrus Avenue 1-15 Northbound - Jurupa Avenue to Sierra Avenue 1-15 Southbound - Riverside County line to Sierra Avenue Mitigation: The applicant will contribute a traffic fee in accordance with the City's Traffic Fee Program for backbone infrastructure and will contribute on a fair-share basis to traffic mitigation determined by the City Engineer for those roadways and segments that will be directly affected by the proposed project. In addition, prior to approval of any tract map, a traffic study will be completed to determine whether the incremental increase in traffic resulting with the particular tract map will cause any of the affected intersections to result in unsatisfactory levels of service. If this occurs, the traffic study will determine required improvements, phasing of improvements, and funding sources. Based on the mitigation, the traffic impacts will be reduced to insignificant levels. 3. Air Quali.ty: Impac,t.: The shod and long term air quality impacts as a result of the proposed project will exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds of significance. Mitigation: The EIR finds that the impacts coming from the grading and construction activities can be mitigated to insignificant levels. However, the emissions from increased vehicular trips, even with mitigation measures, will continue to exceed SCAQMD. This PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 8 is considered an unavoidable adverse impact of the project. This issue will be further discussed in Section D of the report. 4. Noise: Impact: The Noise Study that was prepared for the Draft EIR finds that noise will be generated from grading and construction activities as well as from increased traffic generation. Mitigation: The EIR finds that Implementation of mitigation measures listed in Exhibit "C "will reduce impact to a level of insignificance. Schools: Impact: The project area is within the Etiwanda School District and Chaffey Joint Union High School District. Schools within the two districts are at or above capacity. Future development will generate more students for the already impacted school districts. The total number of students generated by the project is based on the number of dwelling units for each land use category multiplied by the student generation rates from both school districts. The increased number of new students estimated for each of the two school districts are 597 students for K-Grade 5; 265 students for Grades 6-8; and 274 students for Grades 9-12. A total of 1,136 new students will be generated with the project. Mitigation: Because the proposed project includes a new 10-acre school site, the EIR finds that it will help to accommodate students in K-Grade 5. To further reduce the impact to a less than significant level, the EIR requires that the applicant execute an agreement with the two districts to provide adequate mitigation and participate in the school districts' Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts for alternative methods to finance the mitigation of school impacts. 6. Parks and Recreation: Impact.: The residential portion of the proposed project will increase the demand for parklands within the Victoria Community Plan and Eftwanda Specific Plan areas. The project should provide 18.43 acres of parkland for its areas within the Victoria Community Plan and an additional 2.25 acres of parkland for its areas within the Eftwanda Specific Plan; for a total of 20.68 acres of parkland. As proposed, the project will only provide a total of 13.8 acres of active recreational facilities, thus, resulting in a deficiency of 6.98 acres which is a potentially significant impact to park facilities. Mitigation.: To mitigate the impact to an insignificant level, the EIR finds that the applicant shall be responsible for the 20.68 acres of parkland by dedication or by fee. Further, a mitigation listed in the EIR requires the applicant to design and construct a park. Impact: The project will increase the demands for active recreational facilities including trails. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 9 Mitigation: To mitigate the impacts, the EIR finds that future development proposals must provide additional acreage for trails to meet City needs. In addition, the applicant shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, the community trails within the Victoria Community Plan, and the 25-foot parkway on the east side of future Day Creek Boulevard including the multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Compliance with these recommended mitigation measures reduces park and recreational impacts to levels of insignificance. Police and Fire Protection: Impact: Future development within the project area will place considerable demand on law enforcement and fire protection services. Mitigation: The impacts can be reduced to a less than significant level by forming and/or joining the Law Enforcement and the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts to pay for and provide services to the project area. 8. Aesthetics/Visual: Impac'!: The project will replace 19 acres of proposed lakes and open space, resulting in a loss of planned open space, and alteration of existing and future public views and view corridors. Mitigation: The EIR finds that the applicant should account for the loss of the aesthetic benefit of the lakes by providing a new focal point concept within the residential area. The focal point should include open space trail system linkages to the winery site and commercial areas to the south by an open space corridor incorporating such features as fountains, large gazebos, public art, public furniture, and/or increase open space/trails systems. The EIR finds that with these mitigation measures, impacts will be reduced to insignificant levels. Impact: New light and glare will also be created with the project. Mitigation: The City's Design Review process will be the mechanism to ensure excessive light and/or glare is not created by future development. Biological Resources: Impact: The project will diminish habitat for wildlife or plants consuming 181.2 acres of alluvial fan coastal sage scrub. Miti.clation:: Even though the project will substantially diminish habitat for wildlife and plants. the EIR finds that the potential impact is insignificant in this case because the quality' of the alluvial fan coastal sage scrub is poor, and rare, threatened or endangered species were not observed on site. The EIR did not recommend mitigation for the loss of the habitat. However, the EIR finds that the cumulative impact is considered to be significant and recommends that the applicant participate in an off-site mitigation bank -7/ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 10 10. 11. to provide compensation for the loss of the habitat but with a less than 1:1 replacement ratio. Staff Comments: According to the Interim Review Guidelines contained in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the City is the lead agency which retains the discretion to make the determination whether a project within the MSHCP area, because of the project's characteristics, has no impact on the viability of biological resources and would not preclude long term preservation planning. In this case, staff concurs with the findings of the EIR that the impact is insignificant because of the poor quality of the alluvial fan coastal sage habitat and that there were no rare, threatened or endangered species sighted. Presently, there are tremendous development pressures in the City and the project area is already surrounded by development. However, within the City's sphere of influence is the North Etiwanda area, which contains better to pristine quality alluvial fan coastal sage scrub habitats. Therefore, the long term preservation planning of the habitats is not precluded. Based on this analysis, staff determines that the cumulative impact is insignificant and does not warrant mitigation. Impact: The proposed project contains 4.1 acres of man-made wetlands. The applicant processed and received a 404 permit from the Army Corps of Engineers to remove 3 acres with the agreement of preserving 0.97 acres on site and participating in off-site mitigation bank for the loss of 0.4 acres. Retention may have an impact on the City's ability to maintain the wetland and improve or divert flows in the drainage system to the north. Additionally, retention of the wetland may increase the presence of vectors. Mitigation: If the City chooses to eliminate the onsite wetland, an Individual 404 Permit must first be obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Cultural Resources: There are no known historic human burials and/or cultural materials present on site. In the event a cultural resource is uncovered, ground disturbing activities will be redirected and a qualified archaeologist will be retained to evaluate the find. If human remains are encountered, the San Bernardino County Coroner must be notified. If human remains are considered prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission will be notified. Geologic: Staff and consultant did not list geology as an impact because the project site is not within a Fault Zone or subject to liquefaction according to the City's General Plan, However, the California Division of Mines and Geology responded to the Draft EIR stating that the site is subject to significant ground motion and recommended that more stringent design standards for structures, especially schools, be applied. Staff has acknowledged this issue and will place a condition of approval for any proposed development within the project site requiring a geotechnical study on liquefaction and ground motion to be conducted by a registered engineering geologist and submitted to the City for review. Staff has forwarded the comments from the Division of Mines and Geology to the City's Building and Safety Division and Etiwanda School District. Staff will be contacting the State geologist to obtain information and supporting documents for our upcoming General Plan Study. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 11 Unavoidab!e Impacts: According to the EIR, all impacts except for long-term air quality impacts, will be reduced to insignificant levels with mitigation measures. The EIR finds that emissions for carbon monoxide, reactive organic compounds, and nitrogen oxide will exceed SCAQMD thresholds for daily operations by a large margin. Even with implementation of mitigation, air quality impacts cannot be reduced to insignificant levels. As discussed previously, the City must balance the benefits of the proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project. If the benefits outweigh the unavoidable adverse impacts, the City may adopt a statement of its view that the significant unavoidable adverse impacts are acceptable because of overriding concerns. A Statement of Facts and Findings (Exhibit "E") and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (Exhibit "F") has been prepared for Planning Commission review. Alternative~ Considered: As required by CEQA, a total of five alternatives were evaluated, including No Project/No Development; Existing Victoria Community Plan and Eftwanda Specific Plan; Low Medium Density Residential; School/Park; and Increased Regional Retail/Special Use Zone alternatives. Alternative 1 - No Project/No Development Alternative Under this alternative, the project site will remain in its existing vacant condition. Most of the potential impacts associated with the proposed project will be avoided, especially the proposed project's impacts on air quality. 2. Alternative 2 - Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan This alternative assumes the project site will be developed according to plans of the Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan. Under the Victoria Lakes Village Plan of the Victoria Community Plan, the project site is designated for higher residential densities. The character of the lakes was to be formed by the unique relationship of the residential, commercial, and recreational land uses surrounding a system of three terraced lakes. Under this alternative, the areas within the Etiwanda Specific Plan would be developed Office/Professional. This alternative would result in greater impacts to air quality; noise; traffic; and police, fire, and school services because a greater number of dwelling units and land use intensity would be provided. However, this alternative would have less incompatible land uses and would require less land use mitigation. This alternative would reduce aesthetic impacts by providing more open space acreage in the form of a tiered lake feature from Base Line Road to Church Street. 3. Alternative 3 - Low Medium Density Residential Alternative This alternative would develop the project site as Low-Medium Density Residential (4 to 8 units per acre) north of Church Street, south of Base Line Road, between Eftwanda Avenue and Victoria Loop. The Office/Professional designation would be eliminated and replaced with Low-Medium Density Residential. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 12 VVith exception of impacts to public services, this alternative would result in impacts at the same levels or less than the proposed project. Unavoidable significant air quality impacts would continue to result with this alternative. Increased burden on police, fire, and school services would result. 4. Alternative 4 - School/Park Alternative This alternative would develop a school and park next to the winery, south of Base Line Road and west of Victoria Loop. An open space corridor would extend from the wetland area west of Victoria Loop south to Church Street. Proposed land uses west of Etiwanda and north of Church Street would remain Office/Professional; areas between Victoria Loop on the west, Eftwanda Avenue on the east, Base Line to the north and Church Street on the south would be designated Low-Medium. An Office/Professional buffer adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue 'would be provided. With exception of impacts to public services, this alternative would result in impacts at the same levels or less than the proposed project. Unavoidable significant air quality impacts would continue to result with this alternative. Increased burden on police and fire services would result. This alternative would provide an aesthetic benefit by providing a view shed corridor south through the park/school site from Base Line Road. 5. Alternative 5 - Increased Regional Retail/Special Use Zone This "new" alternative was discussed in the re-circulated Draft EIR. This alternative proposes to retain 51.8 acres of the area between Day Creek Boulevard and the SCE easement as Regional Related Office Commercial. Medium-High and High Density Residential uses would be integrated with commercial uses through a master planned development. Approximately 15 acres along the northern perimeter of the site adjacent to the winery, would allow residential,, commercial, and community uses within a Mixed Use Zone. Areas within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area, currently designated Office Park would be converted to Low Medium Residential. The areas south of Church Street, between Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Loop would allow low intensity, "soft-retail" (low noise, low traffic commercial) uses; 19.7 acres would be converted from Low Density Residential to Low Medium Residential. This alternative would create traffic, noise, and air quality impacts at levels greater than the proposed project. Development of the 51.8 acres would generate greater impacts related to police, park, and school services. Other impacts would be the same between this alternative and the proposed project. Planning Commission Workshops: During the public review period for the Draft EIR, the Planning Commission held a total of four workshops to understand and familiarize themselves with the different components of the project. These workshops serve to provide direction and guidance to the applicant and staff regarding environmental and land use and design issues within the project. Key community representatives of the Victoria and Etiwanda communities were invited to the workshops. These workshops in no case serve as a public hearing for the project. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01, ESPA 98-01 May 26, 1999 Page 13 Conclusion: Based on the above analysis, staff concluded that the EIR has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. Again, staff would like to reiterate that determining the EIR is adequate does not mean or imply support or approval of the proposed project. However, before the proposed project can be approved, a Statement of Overriding Considerations would need to be adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted with three 4 by 8 feet public hearing signs, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 1,000 feet around the project site. Also, key community representatives and residents of the Victoria Planned community and Etiwanda Community have been sent notices of this pubic hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the report, conduct the hearing to receive public input and conclude the public hearing. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the EIR is adequate for certification and forward that recommendation to the City Council. Respe~ City Planner Attachments: Fxhibit "A" - Draft Final EIR (document transmiffed separately) Exhibit "B" - Project Area Exhibit "C" - Summary of Significant Impacts and Mitigation Exhibit "D"- Mitigation Monitoring Program Exhibit "E" - Statement of Findings and Facts Exhibit "F" - Statement of Overriding Considerations Resolution Recommending the adequacy of the EIR to the City Council FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR GP.A 98-02, VCPA 98-01 AND ESPA 98-01 TRANSMITTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER EXHIBIT "A" Jl . END ': ~-:'.7::?'~'~- ;../ F ....~, -:' ......:- ' -- / ~ I V~ctoria . I - I CommumWFlan ~;:"' ' "~; '""' "' '.~ ~ ," .....~ x5 ~ ~ttw.a~nda,,, ' .:..', .....'.'.:."'.'" ~."~ ~"! ': ii ~,~.::/~ '."''6,~ ~ bpCClnCi Jan ,. ......~ ~4, ,, . ;~ ~. ,,...~ '~ .... ~ / / Area of Proposed - - ' ................ ;'"' ..........' ...........' '"~ ......'~' Amendments - [oo~!~' ~ ,:,,~ r-,.' ~." :,~~ . - - · . . .. :,:~,.,.~,-,:: ,.:~ ,.~ ...., ~],< RESIDEN~ ]AL · % · ". '",.'~:.,:~;.,;.:'.':'.';'.~:!!~1:'.?. !'·,'~, - ,,, '.:> :'/ M!tMedium ttigh Density f14-241.)U,I(')...: ';:' "" ";" '"~' .~ I I t ligh Density a4-30 . .~:/ COMMERCIAL - O--- o ........ .-, ??'/ CF Communib' Facility "' ' '~ OP Office Park ~ RRC Regional Related Commercial . ' ~ RR Regional Related Office/Commercial . .~ ~ VC Village Commercial ~ ~~ PUBLIC & OUAS! PUBLIC P P~s/School SBCFC S~ Bem~dMo Co~ Flood ConSol B~e Map Sours: The CiW ofR~cho Cuc~onga Pl~ing ~p~enL 1997. UC UtiliW Co~idor ~evised 3/2~99(C~G831 ~IR) GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-02 & ESPA 98-01 N E~IBIT "B 1" LSA 0 500' 1000' Figure 3.3 Proposed and Existing Land Uses '7;7 _ji SUBAREA 2 --.., M ]~ m iSUBAREA 1 Base Line Rd H -- E LlVl LM& L ...... to L .a MH to ~ LM &P ~ MH to 2 ~ Church St RR m to LM ~ ~c RR Foothill B!vd RR Base Map Source: The Ci~ of Rancho Cu~onga Planning Dcparlmen[. 1997 I ~16/98(CRG83 I/EIR) N :j ..... SUBAREA 3 i Project Boundary I ~Victoria . i ~.ommunlty man ' "~!~[{~] Etiwunda Specific Piun r ~ Area of Proposed [" ' ' ' 'q Land Use A m endments RESIDENTIAL L Low Density (2-4 DU/AC) LM Low Medium Density (4.8 DU/AC~ M Medium Dcnsity 1'8.14 MI] Medium High Density tl4.24 Dt.,'/.l() H High Density (24-j0 COMMERCIAL CF Commercial Facility OP Office Park RRC Regional Related Commercial RR Regional Related Office/Commercial Village Commercial PUBLIC & QUASI PUBLIC P Parks/School SBCFC San Bernardino County Flood Control UC Utility Corridor GPA 98-02/VCPA 98-01/ESPA 98-01 EXHIBIT "B2" 0 500' 1000' Figure 3.3 Proposed and Existing Land Uses DRAFT Excerpt from May 26, 1999 Minutes ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-0! -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO. - A public headng for a proposed project to be known as the Victoda Arbors Village on 291.8 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community, generally bounded by Base Line Road, future Victoria Park Lane, future Church Street, future Day Creek Boulevard, Foothill Boulevard, and the Day Creek Channel - APN: 227-201-04, 13 through 18, 22, 28 through 30, and 36; 222-201-33; 227-161-33, 35, 36, and 38; 227-171-11, 12, and 14. Related file: Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01. (A) Land Use changes for the following areas: Subarea 1: Subarea la - from Medi'um Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Community Facilities to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 7.67 acres of land, generally located on the south side of Base Line Road, west of the winery; and consideration of alternative land use designations of Community Facilities. Subarea lb - from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Park, and School for approximately 57.40 acres of land, generally located east of future Day Creek Boulevard and 600 feet south of Base Line Road; and the consideration of alternative land use designations of Community Facilities for the northeast side of the subarea, immediately east of the winery. S, ubarea lc - from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 21.13 acres of land for the area generally located south of Base Line Road and east of future Victoria Park Lane; and consideration of retaining the Low-Medium Residential designation. Subarea ld - from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), Regional Related Office/Commercial, and Park to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 39.45 acres of land, generally located on the north side of future Church Street and east of future Day Creek Boulevard; and consideration of alternative land use designations of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre). Subarea le - from Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre) and Regional Related Office/Commercial to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 13.76 acres of land, generally located north of future Church Street, west of future Victoria Loop Street; and consideration of alternative land use designations of Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Medi. um-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre). Subarea 2- from Regional Related Office/Commercial to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre), and Planning Commission Minutes -8- May 26, 1999 DRAFT Excerpt from May 26, 1999 Minutes High Residential (24-30 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 53 acres of land, generally located on the west side of future Day Creek Boulevard, north and south of future Church Street; and consideration of retaining the Regional Related Office/Commercial designation. Subarea 3 - Re-align the boundaries of the Victoria Community Plan to include approximately 28 acres of land from the Etiwanda Specific Plan, generally located on the north side of Church Street and the west side of Etiwanda Avenue; and a request to change the land use designation from Office to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and consideration of alternative land use designations of a mix of Office and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and consideration by the City of retaining the area in the Etiwanda Specific Plan with an Office designation or a mix of Office and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). (B) Amend the Circulation and Parks and Recreation Elements of the General Plan. (C) Amend various graphics and text for the Victoria Community Plan. (D) Consideration by the City of altemative sites for Park and School within the project area of the Victoria Community Plan. (E) Modify the permitted and conditionally permitted uses and various development and design standards for Regional Related Office/Commercial, Regional Center, and Community Facilities of the Victoria Community Plan. ENVIRON:MENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 -AMERICAN BEAUTY DEVELOPMENT CO, - A request to re-align the boundaries of the Etiwanda Specific Plan by re-designating approximately 26 acres of land, generally located on the north side of Church Street and the west side of Etiwanda Avenue to the Victoria Community Plan; and consideration by the City of retaining the area in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and retaining the land use designation of Office; and consideration of alternative land use designations of a mix of Office and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 227-171-11, 12, and 14. Related file: Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and indicated that a revised Resolution clarifying the action had been placed before the Commissioners and had been given to the applicant. Commissioner Mannedno stated it was his understanding that certification merely means that the City believes that the EIR report was properly prepared under CEQA guidelines and contains all of the technical criteria necessary and does not endorse any suggested changes. Ms. Fong confirmed that was correct. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -9- May 26, 1999 DRAFT Excerpt from May 26, 1999 Minutes John Mordsette, Amedcan Beauty Development Co., 16830 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 401, Encino, concurred with staff's recommendation that the EIR be deemed adequate for certification. He commented that Jack Easton from LSA was present. Mr. Morrisette stated that Mr. Easton is LSA's expert on wetlands issues. John Lyons, 11989 Dorset Street, Rancho Cucamonga, gave a bdef history of Victoria. He thought the EIR. should more fully address the financial impacts. He felt the City had bought and paid for the residential density north of Base Line Road with the idea that other development south of Base Line Road would pay for the residential. He hoped the City does not allow any future residential development south of Base Line Road before a financial plan is in effect that will pay for the City.. He thought the Utility Tax would not be necessary if development had taken place according to the original plan. Brad Buller, City Planner, indicated that a fiscal report was prepared for the project and is available for review by any member of the public. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Macias commented that an EIR is an information document and is not a project- approval or decision-making document. He said a Planning Commission vote to certify the document would mean only that the City, as the lead agency, felt the CEQ^ process had been satisfied. He believed the project still has major problems. He expressed concerns regarding land use compatibility issues at the winery site and the regional mall site. He thought the proposal offers less than the originally planned open space and lakes and is a major impact on the fiscal impact report because of the change of zoning from commercial to residential along Day Creek Boulevard. He appreciated that the consultant had extensively investigated the wetlands issue but felt the impact is still nebulous and the City needs to talk to the Army Corps of Engineers. He said that if the project were up for a vote tonight, he would not vote for approval of the project as it now stands even though he would be willing to vote for certification of the EIR. Commissioner Tolstoy concurred with Commissioner Macias. He was concerned with the loss of open space and reasonable buffering of the winery to the north and the commercial area to the south and the loss of commercial area to residential. He said the fiscal impact may be considered adequate but it is not as rich as former expectations of the City. He supported recommending certification of the EIR but said he could not support the project as it was presented at the Commission's last workshop with the applicant. Commissioner Stewart concurred with the other Commissioners. She also expressed concerns regarding the land use along the future Day Creek Boulevard. She said she would support a commercial oveday district along Church Street. Commissioner Mannerino stated that when the Planning Commission discussed allowing General Plan Amendments to proceed during the General Plan update process, the Commission voted unanimously to place a moratorium on land use requests. He reported that when the matter was considered by the General Plan Update Task Force, he changed his vote to vote for a resolution allowing the City to entertain amendment requests on a case-by-case-basis. He said he did that only because the City Planner had indicated he did not believe the individual requests would be overly burdensome on City staff. He stated he would not say whether or not he would vote for or Planning Commission Minutes -10- May 26, 1999 DRAFT Excerpt from May 26, 1999 Minutes against associated land use resolutions but said he had no basis to entertain the requested land use change from commercial to residential. He indicated he was prepared to vote for the certification but he did not endorse, nor necessarily oppose, the requested plan amendment changes. Michael Estrada, Deputy City Attorney, stated it was his belief that all of the Commissioners had indicated they did not have enough information at this time to support the requested plan amendments but they would consider the evidence at the future public headng. He thought the Commissioners are familiar with the project and the EIR. Chairman McNiel agreed with the remainder of the Commission. He observed that the Commission had conducted several workshops, at which time concerns were voiced and the applicant had addressed some, but not all, of those concerns. He noted the issue tonight was certification of t~he EIR. Motion: Moved by Mannerino, seconded by Stewart, to adopt the amended resolution presented by staff, recommending certification of the Environmental Impact Report for General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried Planning Commission Minutes -11- May 26, 1999 EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01 AND ESPA 98-01 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION EXHIBIT "C" L~'/t Assodates, Inc. Table 1.A- Environmental Summary of the Victoria Arbors Village Project Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance 4.1 Land Use Impact 4.1.1 The proposed project consisting of single family There are nutiganon measures related to land use in other sections Mitigated to below a level of ~; ~n';; ..... ;a~ ~ : ..... :~- .... ' ..... -~ ~ ofthis · us.d,. ,t,m wo,,m o,~ ,n uunfl,,~ w a,, ~u,,vund~ng comm~uml ~anu EIR. Mitigation measures outli..~d in sections 4.4 (Noise) significance. uses and adjacent 1-15. The proposed project would create an and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use incompatibility between existing and planned land uses for this compatibility of the project. Those mitigations are as follows: area. This incompatibility between the proposed residential and the 1-15 and planned commercial is a potentially significant Noise impact, but would be reduced to a less than significant level with 4.4.2. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for implementation of mitigation measures in the noise and aesthetic review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units sections of the document. proposed within the following areas: · Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; · Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Eftwanda Avenue; · Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; · Within 194 feet of the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Eftwanda Avenue; · Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and · Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the properly line, proper building orienta- tion, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. 4.6.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of"visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Eftwanda Avenue, and Church Street. 5/20/99(A:\TABLEI A fnl.wpd) 1-8 LL4 ~4s~ociates, Inc Issues/Impacts Land Use Impact 4.1.1 (continued) Impact 4.1,2 The proposed project conflicts with the adopted land use, open space, and design concept of the Victoria Lakes Village in the Victoria Community Plan. This incompatibility between these concepts of the Victoria Lakes Village is a potentially significant impact, but would be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of mitigation measures in the public services and aesthetics sections of the document. Aesthetics Mitigation Measures 4.6.1C. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along I- 15 looking north. However, this landscap- ing should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I- 15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4.6.2A. The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are miniimzed. There are mitigation measures related to land use in other sections of this EIR. Mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.5 (Public Services), and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the project. Those mitigations are as follows: Public Services Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland there by fee or by dedication. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. 5/20/99(AATABLEI A fnkwpd) 1-9 1.371 .~lssocia[es, Inc. Issues/Impacts Land Use Impact 4.1.2 (continued) Mitigation Measures 4.5.2(1)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commis- sion shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Comsmss~on review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parkland dedication or fee. 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boule- vard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 4.5.2(2)B. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. 4.$.2(2)C. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Analysis of Significance 5/20/99(A:~TABLEI A fnl,wpd) 1-10 LL4 /tssodates, Inc. Issues~mpacts Land Use Impact 4.1.2 (continued) Impact 4.1.3 The proposed project calls for the elimination of the 19 acres of lake open space, disrupting the physical arrangement of the Victoria Community Plan and especially the Victoria Lakes Village. The elimination of the 19 acres of lakes and open space of the adopted Victoria Village Specific Plan is a potentially significant impact, but would be reduced to a less than significant level with the implementation of mitigation measures in the public services and aesthetic sections of the document. Aesthetics Mitigation Measures 4.6.1C. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along I-15 looking north. However, this landscap- ing should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Eftwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4.6.2A. The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are mlnlmizeo. There are mitigation measures related to land use in other sections of this EIR. Mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.5 (Public Services), and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the project. Those mitigations are as follows: Public Services Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland there by fee or by dedication. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. 5/20/99(A:WABLE1 A fnl.wpd) 1-11 l~f./l ~ ~xodatrr, Inc. Issues/Impacts Land Use Impact 4.1.3 (continued) Mitigation Measures 4.$.2(1)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commis- sion shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Comrmssion review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parkland dedication or fee. 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time deveiopment plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boule- vard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Eftwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 4.$.2(2)B. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. 4.$.2(2)C. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Analysis of Significance 5/20/99( A:\TABLE l_A_£nl.wpd) 1-12 Issues~mpacts Land Use Impact 4.1.3 (continued) Aesthetics Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance Impact 4.1.4 The proposed project would create a residential "island" within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, creating a potentially significant impact, but that would be reduced to less than signifi- cant level with implementation of mitigation measures. 4.6.2.B. The developer shall account for the loss of the aesthetic benefit of the lakes by providing a new focal point concept within residential area to be submitted for Design Review. The focal point concept could include an open space trail system linkage to the winery site and conur~rcial areas to the south by an open space corridor, and incorporate such features as a fountains, large gazebo, public art, public furniture, and/or increased open space/ trails systems. 4.6.3A. Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the interchanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. 4.6.3C. The Community Design Criteria Part II of the Victoria Community Plan shall be amended immediately following project approval to address new uses proposed as part of the project. However, as part of this amendment, some requirements shall be included to reduce visual impacts of new development by inclusion of landscaping near major roads that matches those proposed by the Plan. For example, trees shall be planted along the site's property lines and along roadways to screen new development from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east-west corridors, the City shall designate areas for landscaping, ensuring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with low-growing vegetation to maintain a degree of visual open space on the project site. There are mitigation measures related to land use in other sections of this EIR. Mitigation measures outlined in sections, 4.3 (Air Quality), 4.4 (Noise), 4.5 (Public Services), and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the project. Those mitigation measures are as follows: Mitigated to below a level of significance. 5/20/99(A:\TABLEI A fnl,wpd) 1-13 Issues/Impacts Land Use Impact 4.1.4 (continued) 5/20/99(A:\TABLEI A fnl.wpd) Mitigation Measures Air Quality 4.3.1A. The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel- powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.3.1D. The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 4.3.1E. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 4.3.1F. The developer shall install bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. 4.3.1G. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transporta- tion of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. L3'/I .'l,tsodale,t, Inc. Analysis of Significance 1-14 Issues/Impacts ~Land Use Impact 4.1.4 (continued) 5/20/99( A:\TABLE l_A_fnl. wpd) Mitigation Measures b. During construction, water tracks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles _per hour. c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is com- pleted, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immedi- ately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. d. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. e. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. Noise 4.4.2. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: · Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; · Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Eftwanda Avenue; · Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; · Within 194 feet of the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Eftwanda Avenue; · Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boule- vard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and · Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boule- vard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orienta- tion, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. LL4 /k~odates, Inc. Analysis of Significance 1-15 Issues/Impacts Land Use Impact 4.1.4 (continued) 5/20/99(A:\TABLEI_A_fnl.wpd) Mitigation Measures 4.6.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of"visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. Public Services Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland there by fee or by dedication. 4.5.2(I)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commis- sion shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parkland dedication or fee. 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Inc. Analysis of Significance 1-16 Issues/Impacts Land Use Impact 4.1.4 (continued) 5/20/99(A:\TABLE 1 _A_fnl,wpd) Mitigation Measures Creek Boulevard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15~ 4.5.2(2)B. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. Aesthetics 4.6.1A, New buildings within 100 feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Eftwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35 feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments. 4.6.1 C. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along I- 15 looking north. However, this landscap- ing should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Eftwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4.6.2A. The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. L£4.4s,rodates, Inc. Analysis of Significance 1-17 Issues/Impacts Impact 4.1.5 The proposed project would also create a "sand- wich" effect of residential zones between commercial zones within the Victoria Community Plan, creating a potential signifi- cant impact, but that would be reduced to less than significant level with implementation of mitigation measures~ 5/20/99(A:\TABLE1 A fnl.wpd) Mitigation Measures There are mitigation measures related to land use in other sections of this EIR. Mitigation measures outlined in sections, 4.3 (Air Quality), 4.4 (Noise), 4.5 (Public Services), and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the project. Those mitigation measures are as follows: Air Quality 4.3.1A. The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer*s specifications. 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel- powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.3.19. The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 4.3.1E. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 4.3.1F. The developer shall install bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. 4.3.1G. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transporta- tion of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crest after each day's activities cease. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. 1-18 Issues~mpacts Land Use Impact 4.1.5 (continued) 5/20/99( A:\TABLE I_A_fnl. wpd) Mitigation Measures b. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. d. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. Public Services Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucarnonga to est~ab!ish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland there by fee or by dedication. 4.5.2(1)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commis- sion shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.5.2(1)D. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parkland dedication or fee. l~CA A.rsodales, Inc. Analysis of Significance 1-19 1 ~J.4 Ass~xiates, Inc. Issues/Impacts Land Use Impact 4.1.5 (continued) Mitigation Measures 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on the east side of"future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boule- vard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 4.5.2(2)B. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. 4.5.2(2)C. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Noise 4.4.2. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: · Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; · Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; · Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; · Within 194 feet of the centerline of Chureh Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Eftwanda Avenue; · Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and · Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Analysis of Significance 5/20/99(AATABLEI A fnl.wpd) 1-20 Issues/Impacts Land Use Impact 4.1.5 (continued) 5/20/99(A:\TAB LE l_A_fnl.wpd) Mitigation Measures Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wail, or earthen bcrrn or their combination along the property line, proper building orienta- tion, building facade upgrade, double-parted windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. 4.4.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tail to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wail. This requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. Aesthetics 4.6.1A. New buildings within 100 feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35 feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments. 4.6.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tail to avoid a sense of"visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall bc attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. 4.6.1 C. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along I-15 looking north. However, this landscap- ing should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I- 15~ The landscape design shall be to tbe satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. L~.,4 A.r.r~a/es, Inc. Analysis of Significance 1-21 Lf/t /lss~tes, Inc. Issues/Impacts Land Use Impact 4.1.5 (continued) Impact 4.1.6 The proposed project would be incompatible with existing land uses such as the Fillipi Winery, the Nichiren Shoshu Temple and a future regional mall, and would create potential significant impacts. These impacts would be reduced to less than significant level with implementation of mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures 4.6.2A. The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; zmd, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. 4.6.3A. Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the interchanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. 4.1.6A Lots within the Victoria Arbors Village project with backyards that abut upon commercial or office/professional uses shall be set back 60 feet from the common property line. Homes on lots whose side yards abut commercial or office/profession uses shall be set back 30 feet from the common property line. 4.1.6B The number of windows which look onto commercial or office/professional uses shall be minimized. Windows which look upon these uses shall be double paned. Window insulation shall be sufficient to ensure interior noise levels to 45 dB CNEL. 4.1.6C An 8-foot slump block wall shall be constructed along the common property line which separates the residential and non- residential use. The base of the wall shall be planted with a 16-foot wide buffer (8 feet of landscaping on each side of the wall). Landscaping materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 4.1.6D The CC &Rs for any residential unit abutting upon a non- residential use shall disclose the presence of the adjacent non- residential use and, to the extent possible describe the potential nuisances which might be generated by the non-residential use. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance, 5/20/99(A:\TABLE l_A_fnl.wpd) 1-22 Issues~mpacts Land Use Impact 4.1.6 (continued) 4.2 Traffic Impact 4.2.1. Fifteen intersections are forecast to exceed the minimum LOS standards under 2015 background plus project conditions in one or both peak hours. These are: · Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard · Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard · Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard · Victoria Park Lane/Base Line Road · Etiwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue · Etiwanda Avenue/Victoria Street · Etiwanda Avenue/Base Line Road · Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street-Miller Avenue · Eftwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard · Eftwanda Avenue/Arrow Route · Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue · East Avenue/Base Line Road · Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road · 1-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road · I-15 Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road Mitigation Measures 4.1.6E No residential or non-residential use shall generate noise, odors, or unnecessary light, glare or shadow beyond the property line of said use. 4.1.6F A 20-foot landscape and 25-foot additional rear yard buffer shall be provided on the north side of Church Street between Eftwanda Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. Landscaping materials shall contain a variety of species used to buffer traffic noise and light and glare from potential commercial uses south of Church Street The landscape design shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 4.2.1A. The project proponent shall contribute a traffic fee in accordance with the City's adopted traffic fee program for backbone infrastructure (Transportation Department Impact Fee Ordinance No. 445) as the project's fair share contribution to additional circulation improvements identified as necessary to maintain an acceptable level of service as identified in a Traffic Impact Analysis. Applicant shall make a fair share contribution to traffic mitigations as determined by the City Engineer. The additional circulation improvements shall consist of the following: · Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By 2015, the addition of a northbound right turn lane. Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By project opening, the addition of a third eastbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a third westbound through lane and a northbound right turn lane. Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - By project opening, the addition of a westbound free right turn lane. Victoria Park Lane/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of an eastbound right turn lane. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a southbound right tun lane and a second westbound left turn lane. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. 5/20/99(ASTABLEI_A_fnl.wpd) 1-23 Issues/Impacts Traffic Impact 4.2.1 (continued) 5/20/99(A:\TABLE1 _A_fnl.wpd) Mitigation Measures Etiwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue - By 2015, the addition of a northbound right turn lane and a southbound right turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Victoria Street - By 2015, signalization. Etiwanda Avenue/Base Line Road - By 2015, modification of signal timing to provide a cycle length of less than 130 seconds. · Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street-Miller Avenue - By project opening, signalization. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a northbound left turn lane, a northbound right turn lane, a southbound left turn lane, a southbound right turn lane, an eastbound left turn lane, an eastbound right turn lane, a westbound left turn lane, and a westbound right turn lane. · Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By 2015, the addition of a northbound through lane, a northbound free right turn lane, and a southbound through lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route - By project opening, the addition of a northbound through lane. By 2015, further improve- ments include the addition of a second northbound left turn lane, a third northbound t.h. rough lane, a southbound through lane, and a second eastbound left turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue - By 2015, the addition of a third northbound through lane and a third south- bound through lane. East Avenue/Base Line Road - By 2015, the addition of a northbound left turn lane, an eastbound right turn lane, and a westbound right turn lane. Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a second eastbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition of a second northbound left turn lane, a second northbound through lane, a southbound right turn lane, and an eastbound right turn lane. Analysis of Significance 1-24 Issues/Impacts Traffic Impact 4.2.1 (Continued) Mitigation Measures 1-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a westbound free right turn lane and a second westbound left turn lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition of a second southbound right turn lane. · 1-15 Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a second eastbound left, conversion of the northbound right turn lane to a free right turn lane and the addition of a second northbound left turn lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition of a second northbound right turn lane and a third westbound through lane. 4.2.1B. Circulation improvements have been identified to achieve standards levels of service (i.e., local jurisdiction and/or SANBAG) at study area intersections. To address the timing, funding, and implementation of these improvements, the following mitigation measure or condition of approval is recommended: · Prior to the approval of any tract map, a traffic study shall be completed to determine whether the incremental increase in traffic from the tract map area causes any of the intersections under investigation to result in unsatisfactory levels of service. If unacceptable levels of service result, this traffic analysis shall determine the portion of the ultimate intersections' improvements that are required, the phasing of the improvement, and the funding source. Impact 4.2.2. The proposed project will contribute to deficien- 4.2.2. The project shall contribute on a fair-share basis to the cost of cies along the following freeway sections: providing the following freeway lane additions: SR-30 Eastbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue · SR-30 Westbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue 1-10 Eastbound - LA County line to Citrus Avenue l-10 Westbound - LA County line to Citrus Avenue I~ 15 Northbound - Jurnpa Avenue to Sierra Avenue · I-15 Southbound - Riverside County line to Sierra Avenue SR-30 Eastbound LA County Line to I-15 - addition of two lanes l-15 to Alder Avenue - addition of one lane SR-30 Westbound LA County line to I-15 - addition of two lane 1-15 to Alder Avenue - addition of one lane Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. 5/20/99(ASTABLE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) 1-25 LJ/1.4ssodates, Inc. Issues/Impacts Traffic Impact 4.2.2 (Continued) 4.3 Air Quality Short-term Construction-related Impacts Impact Summary: Air quality impacts may occur during the site preparation including grading and equipment exhaust as it is used onsite. Major sources of emissions during this phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, as well as soil disturbances by grading and filling. NOx and PM10 levels will be exceeded on a daily basis during construction; however, with implementation of mitigation measures impacts will be reduced to less-than-significant levels. Mitigation Measures 1-10 Eastbound LA County line to Euclid Avenue - addition of four lanes Euclid Avenue to Vineyard Avenue - addition of three lanes Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue - addition of two lanes Archibald Avenue to Milliken Avenue - addition of three lanes Milliken Avenue to 1-15 - addition of four lanes I-15 to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-10 Westbound LA County line to Monte Vista - addition of three lanes Monte Vista to Milliken Avenue - addition of two lanes Milliken Avenue to 1-15 - addition of three lanes I- 15 to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-15 Northbound Jurupa Avenue to I-10 - addition of one lane 1-10 to Cherry. Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-15 Southbound Sierra Avenue to Jurupa Avenue - addition of one lane Refer to mitigation measure 4.3,1 below. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. 5/20/99(ASTABLE1 A fnl.wpd) 1-26 1.3'A Assodates, Inc. Issues/Impacts Air Quality (continued) Grading and Construction Emissions Impact 4-3.1. Peak grading and construction emissions would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District thresh- olds for the criteria pollutant of NOx, which is 2.5 tons per quarter and PMi0, which is 150 pounds per day. Emissions of other criteria pollutants would be below the standards. This is a potentially significant impact, but would be reduced to a less- than-significant level with implementation of mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures 4.3.1A. The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low ewession factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel- powered equipment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the construction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.3.1D. The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. 4.3.1E. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 4.3.1F. The developer shall install bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. 4.3.1G. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. 5/20/99(A:\TABLE1 A fnkwpd) 1-27 I~'.4 ~4 rtacia~'es, Inc. Issues/Impacts Air Quality Impact 4.3.1 (continued) Long-Term Regional Air Quality Impacts Impact Summary: Long-term air emission impacts are those associated with any change in permanent usage of the project site. Stationary sources include any onsite emissions and emissions at the power plant associated with the electrical requirements of the project. Mobile source emissions result from vehicle trips associated with the proposed project. Mitigation Measures Analysis of Significance a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or Mitigated to below a level of transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler significance. systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. b. ~afing constraction, water trucks or sprinkler systewa shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. c. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. d. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. e. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. 4.3.1H The Construction Contractor shall utilize as much as possible precoated/natural colored building materials, water-based or low-VOC coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coatings application such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge. Refer to mitigation measures 4.3.2 and 4.3.3. 5/20/99(A:\TABLE1 A fnl.wpd) 1-28 I~/t ,4.~.wa~te.f, Inc. Issues/Impacts Impact 4.3.2. The long-term occupancy of the proposed develop- ment of homes and retail commercial uses would consume natural gas and electricity~ On-site stationary sources (i.e., energy consumption) emissions would be below the emission thresholds established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District except for NOx e__rrhssions~ This is a si. gnificant !ong~te~,-m imp~t of the proposed project. Impact 4.3.3. Vehicular trips associated with the proposed project would produce emissions that would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District daily thresholds for the criteria pollutant of CO, ROC, and NOx. This is a significant impact. Even after implementation of the mitigation measures identified, ~t is not guaranteed that the emissions would be reduced to below the thresholds. Therefore, it would remain a significant impact. Mitigation Measures 4.3.2A. The project shall comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations established by the Energy Commission regarding energy conservation standards. The project applicant shall incorporate the following in building plans: · P!mnting trees to provide shade and shadow to building; Solar or low-emission water heaters shall be used with combined space/water heater unit; Refrigerator with vacuum power insulation; Double-pained glass or window treatment for energy conservation shall be used in all exterior windows; and · Energy-efficient low-sodium parking lot lights shall be used. 4.3.3A. Use of transportation demand measures (TDM) such as preferential parking for vanpooling/carpooling, subsidy for transit pass or vanpooling/carpooling. flextime work schedule, bike racks, lockers, showers, and onsite cafeteria shall be incorporated in the design of the commercial land uses. 433B. The project proponent shall determine with the City and the electrical purveyor if it is feasible to pre-wire houses for electrical charges for EV cars and/or optic-fibers for home offices. If feasible, install EV charges and/or optic-fibers per the electrical purveyor's direction prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 4.3.3C. Install EV chargers or alternative fuel stations (natural gas) for community wide use at key commercial and public location(s) such as park and ride lots, Metrolink stations, and commercial centers. 4.3.3.D. The developer shall contract with a mitigation monitor to assure compliance and implementation with the mitigation monitoring program. 4.3.3.E. The develomr shall install trails per the Cit¥'s General Bikeways Plan. Analysis of Significance See below. Operational emissions of the proposed project would result in total emissions of 2,034 lbs./day of CO, 153 Ibs_/day of ROC, 326 Ibs./day of NOx, 36 lbs./day of SOx, and 47 lbs./day of PM~o. Emission levels of CO, ROC, and NOx would ex- ceed the SCAQMD threshold for long- term operations. Even after implementa- tion the mitigation measures identified, it is not guaran teed that the emissions would be reduced to below the thresholds. Therefore, the project's impact on air qual- ity during daily operations would remain significant and the City must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations. 5/20/99(ASTABLEI A fnl.wpd) 1-29 LfA Assodates, Inc. Issues~mpacts 4.4 Noise Impact 4.4.1: Noise levels from grading and other construction activities for the proposed project may range up to 85 dBA at the closest residences to the northeast of the project site north of Base Line Road or to the east of Etiwanda Avenue for ve~ limited times when construction occurs near them. Construction-related noise impacts would be potentially significant; however, w~th implementation of mitigation measures identified, the impact would be reduced to less than significant. Impact 4.4.2: Increases in noise levels could result from project- related traffic on access roads leading to the project site. Project- related long-term vehicular trip increases would be 45,487 daily. The incremental traffic noise level increases would be less than 2 dBA, except along Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard, where the increase would be 4.7 dBA but no sensitive uses exist currently. No significant traffic noise impacts on off-site sensitive uses are anticipated. However, proposed on-site residential uses would potentially be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the 60 dBA Ldn standard recommended for residential uses. Implementation of mitigation measures would be required to reduce such an impact to less than significant. Mitigation Measures 4.4.1A. During all project site excavation and grading on-site, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards. 4.4.iB. The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors to the east of the site. 4.4.1C. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction- related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors to the east of the site during all project construction. 4.4.1D. During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction-related activities that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless such construction activities do not result in noise levels exceeding 45 dBA at residences to the east of the site. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. 4.4.2. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: · Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; · Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; · Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; · Within 194 feet of the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue; · Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and · Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. Mitigated to below a level of significance. 5/20/99(A:WABLE 1 _A_fnl.wpd) 1-30 l~/l /lsscdate.r, Inc. Noise (continued) 4.5 Public Services Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wail, or earthen berm or their combination aiong the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-parted windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shail be provided. Analysis of Significance Schools Impact 4.5.1. As a result of the overcrowding in the classrooms of the Eftwanda and Chaffey School Districts, both districts have urged and continue to urge the City not to approve development applications unless adequate school facilities are available to serve the development project. Future development will generate more students for the already impacted school districts and is considered significant. School mitigation plans would be enacted between the Etiwanda School District/Chaffey Joint Union High School District and the project developer providing for a per dwelling unit fee rate for the residentiai portion of the project site. Implementation of this mitigation would reduce impacts on schools to a less-than-significant level. Parks and Recreation 4.5.1A. The developer shail be required to execute an agreement with Eftwanda School District and Chaffey Unified High School District to provide adequate mitigation. Such an agreement shail be executed prior to Planning Commission approval for any residentiai project within the General Plan Amendment area. Actuai implementation of the agreement by the payment of fees, dedication of sites or other mitigation will take place as building permits are obtained. 4.5.1B. In the event that the developer declines to execute a mitigation agreement, the City shail require full mitigation as a condition of approvai. Full mitigation shail be accomplished by means of a requirement to form a Mello-Roos Community Facilities district for school facilities. In order to reduce the burden on the future homeowners, it is possible to structure the community facilities district such that some of the speciai taxes would be prepaid by the developer. Mitigated to below a level of significance. Impact 4.5.2(1). The residential portion of the proposed project 4.5.2(1)A, The developer shail be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set Mitigated to below a level of would increase the demand for active recreation facilities within by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish significance. the Victoria Community and Etiwanda Specific Plan areas. For regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park the Victoria Community Plan area, the proposed project must and recreationai land in subdivisions and planned communities. The provide 18.43 acres of parkland, and for the Etiwanda Specific developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland either by fee or Plan, an additionai 2.25 acres for atotai of 20.68 acres ofparkland by dedication. 5/20/99(A:~TABLEI A fnl.wpd) 1-31 LJA ~lssociates, Inc. Issues/Impacts Public Services, Parks & Recreation Impact 4.5.2(1) (continued) is required for the proposed project. Currently, the proposed project has only provided for a total of 8.62 acres of active recreational facilities causing a deficiency of 20.68 acres of active recreation which is a significant impact to park facihties. To mitigate this shortage of active recreation, future development proposals must provide additional acreage to meet the recreational needs of this community. Implementation of the mitigation will reduce impacts on parks to a less-than-significant level. Impact 4.5.2(2). The residential and commercial areas proposed would increase the demand for active recreational facilities causing a significant impact to trail use in the City. To mitigate the potential impacts to trails and to also implement the City's Master Plan of Trails, future development proposals must provide additional acreage for trails to meet the need within the City. Implementation of the mitigation to provide trails per the City's Master Plan of Trails will reduce impacts on trail systems and recreation to less -than-significant levels. Mitigation Measures 4.5.2(1)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C, Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 4~.2(1)D~ The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres of parks and dedication or fee. 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boulevard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Eftwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 4.5.2(2)B. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. 4.5.2(2)C. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. 5/20/99(A:WABLE1 A fnl.wpd) 1-32 L$-/t .4ssaiates, Inc. Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures Police Impact 4.5.3. The proposed project will result in a potentially 4.5,3A. As stated in the General Requirements and Approvals for significant impact as an increase in demand for police services. the Police Department for the City, a signed consent and waiver An additional five police personnel would be required for the form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities pro~sedresidential and commercial develonmenL Mitigation of District shall he filed with city v,o;,oo~,,, prior to final - - ~ ............ ~ .........~ map this impact would require that the City exact fees from the approval or tbe issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first developer through an existing assessment district or form one to for any projects within the project area between Base Line Road and gain the necessary funds for the additional police personnel 1-15. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. needed. Fire Impact 4.5.4. Impacts of the proposed project on fire service for 4.5.4A. The developer shall join the Mello-Roos Community the City of Rancho Cucamonga are potentially significant. Based Facilities District to provide fire protection services to the site. on the standard response time threshold of five minutes, and the project's location relative to Stations 3, 4, and 5, the site is 4.5.4B The developer shall install automated fire sprinkler systems anticipated to fail within the five-minute response time criteria. in commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential units in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No, ! 5 and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 22, 4.6 Aesthetics~'isual Impact 4.6.1. The proposed project would replace 19 acres of lakes and open space, for increased residential and commercial uses, causing a substantial loss of planned open space. This would significantly alter existing and future public views and view corridors. This is a significant impact, but would be reduced to a less-than-significant level with implementation of mitigation measures. 4.6.1A. New buildings within 100 feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Eftwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35 feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments. 4.6.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Eftwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of"visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Eftwanda Avenue, and Church Street. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. Mitigated to below a level of significance. Mitigated to below a level of significance, 5/20/99(A:\TABLEI A fnl.wpd) 1-33 L~/~ /lssodales, Inc, Issues/Impacts 4.6 Aesthetics/Visual (Continued) Impact 4.6.2. New light and glare would be created by the addition of residences and commercial establishments in an area previously proposed as a utility corridor, The most significant glare would be generated by commercial uses at the southern end of the project site, especially in association with outdoor parking that may be lit at night and that would be visible from madways such as the future Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard, as well as minor roads to the east of the project site such as Victoria Loop, Church Street, and Day Creek Boulevard East. This is a potentially significant impact, but would be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of mitigation measures. Impact 4.6.3. The project could conflict with policies of the City's General Plan Community Design Element and recommen- dations found in the Victoria Community Plan. This is a poten- tially significant impact, but would be reduced to a less-than- significant level with implementation of mitigation measures. Mitigation Measures 4.6.1 C. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along I- 15 looking north. However, this landscap- ing should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Eftwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I- 15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4.6.2A. The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. 4.6.2.B. The developer shall account for the loss of the aesthetic benefit of the lakes by providing a new focal point concept within residential area to be submitted for Design Review. The focal point concept could include an open space trail system linkage to the winery site and commercial areas to the south by an open space corridor, and incorporate such features as a fountains, large gazebo, public art, public furniture, and/or increased open space/ trails systems. 4.6.3A. Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the interchanges; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. Mitigated to below a level of significance. 5/20/99(A:\TABLE I _A_fnl.wpd) 1-34 Issues/Impacts Mitigation Measures 4.6 Aesthetics/Visual (Continued) 4.6.3B. To reduce potential conflicts with policies of the City's Community Design Element, recommended mitigation measures found under 4.6.1 shall also be implemented. 4.6.3C. The Conununity Design Criteria Part II of the Victoria Community Plan shall bc amended immediately following project approval to address new uses proposed as part of the projcct~ However, as part of this amendment, some requirements shall bc included to reduce visual impacts of new development by inclusion of landscaping near major roads that matches those proposed by the Plan. For example, trees shall bc planted along the site's property lines and along roadways to screen new development from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east-west corridors, the City shall designate areas for landscaping, ensuring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with low-growing vegetation to maintain a dcgrcc of visual open space on the project site~ 4.7 Biological Resources Impact 4.7.1 The proposed project would result in the loss of No mitigation is required. potential habitat for rare, threatened, or endangered species, however, no rare threatened, or endangered species were detected on the site. The loss of potential, but unoccupied, habitat for such species is not considered to be a significant impact and no mitigation is required. Impact 4.7.2 The proposed project would interfere with local No mitigation is required. wildlife movement patterns, this is not considered to be a signifi- cant impact and no mitigation is required. Impact 4.7.3 The proposed project would substantially diminish 4.7.3A Minimize the amount of coastal sage scrub lost as the result habitat for wildlife or plants; this impact is considered to be of development (i.e., preserve the majority of the habitat on site) significant. through project and construction redesign, and purchase off-site lands to compensate for those areas of coastal sage scrub impacted. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance ~ 5120199(A:WABLEI_A_fnLwpd) 1-35 Issues/Impacts 4.7 Biological Resources (Continued) Impact 4.7.4 The proposed project proposes to retain 0.97 acre of wetland on site. The retention may have a significant impact on the City's ability to maintain the wetland and could increase the presence of vectors. Mitigation Measures 4.7.3B Restore (to ensure no-net-loss of acreage and quality) coastal sage scrub in annual grassland and/or abandoned vineyards to compensate for the loss of these habitats from elsewhere on site. 4.7.3C Participate in off-site mitigation bank (i.e., Team Amndo) to provide compensation for the loss of 0.4 acre of mixed willow series. 4.7.3D Purchase and preserve (in perpetuity) off-site lands to provide substitute resources for the coastal sage scrub that would be lost through project construction. Suitable lands would support coastal sage scrub and would be in a location that would facilitate management of this habitat type, such as adjoining the North Etiwanda Preserve. Given the disturbed condition of habitat on the project site, a less than 1:1 replacement ratio. No mitigation is required. Impact 4.7.5 The proposed project proposes to retain 0.97 acre of 4.7.5A If the City desires to eliminate the retention of the wetland on wetland on site. The retention may have a significant impact on site, an individual 404 permit shall be obtained from the Corps by the City's ability to improve or divert flows in the drainage the applicant. Mitigation required by the Corps may include creation system north of the proposed project area. or enhancement of off-site wetland habitat at a ratio of at least 1:1 and as high as 3:1 (i.e., 3 acres created for each acre impacted). Provisions of the permit shall be adhered to prior to the issuance of grading permits for the area which contains the wetland. 4.8 Cultural Resources Impact 4.8,1, The potential for historic human burials and/or cultural materials may be present in the project area. This is a potentially significant impact but would be reduced to a level below significance with implementation of Mitigation Measure 4.8.1. Analysis of Significance Mitigated to below a level of significance. 4.8,1. In the event a cultural resource is uncovered during the course Mitigated to below a level of of the project, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find significance. should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. If human remains are encountered, the San Bernardino County Coroner must be notified within 24 hours. Iftbe coroner determines that the burial is not historic, but prehistoric,, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted to detertrane the most likely descendent (MLD) for this area. The MLD may become involved with the disposition of the burial. 5/20/99(A:~TABLE1 A fnl.wpd) 1-36 EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01 AND ESPA 98-01 MITIGATION MONITO'RING PROGRAM (MMP) EXHIBIT "D" 115 I~A Associates, Inc. APPENDIX G MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN This mitigation monitoring plan has been prepared for use in implementing mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report for the Victoria Arbors Vil- lage project. This program has been prepared in compliance with the State law to ensure compliance with mitigation measures adopted for the project by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Assembly Bill 3180 (Public Resources Code, Paragraph 201081.6), effective January 1, 1989, requires adoption of a reporting or monitoring program for those conditions of approval placed on a project to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the environment. The law states that the monitoring or reporting program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. The monitoring program contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and procedure necessary to ensure compliance. In some in- stances, one action, such as plan review, may be used to verify implementation of several conditions of approval. .¸ A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. The program has been designed to be flexible. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based on recommenda- tions by those responsible for the program. If changes are made, new monitor- ing compliance procedures and records will be developed and incorporated into the program. 4/28/99 (R:\CRG83 lX,Fina!!_E IR~dITMON.FIN) G-1 Mitigation Measures LAND USE sections of this EIR. Refer to mitigation measures out- lined in sections 4.2 (Traffic), 4.3 (Air Quality), 4.4 (Noise), 4.5 (Public Services), and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the project. 4.1.6A Lots within the Victoria Arbors Village pr~ect with backyards that abut upon commercial or of- rice/professional uses shall be set back 60 feet from the common property line. Homes on lots whose side yards abut commercial or office/profession uses shall be set back 30 feet from the common property line. MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Monitoring and ) Monitoring [ Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Party Refer to individual Monitoring and Report- ing Processes Mitiga- tion Measures under: Traffic Air Quality Noise Public Services Aesthetics The developer shaii submit to the City for review and approval siting plans for those homes that will abut commercial and/or of- fice professional exist- ing and planned uses. Refrr to individual Planning Dept. Milestones for Imple- mentation of Mitiga- tion Measures under: Traffic Air Quality Noise Public Services Aesthetics Prior to the issuance Planning Dept. of building permits. Building Dept· Initials Date 4/28/99(R:\CRG831\Finall EIR\MITMON FIN) G-2 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL [MPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures 4.1.6B The number of windows which look onto com- mercial or office/professional uses shall be minimized. Windows which look upon these uses shall be double paned. Window insulation shall be sufficient to ensure interior noise levels to 45 dB CNEL. Monitoring and Monitoring Reporting Process Milestones The developer shall sub- Prior to issuance of mit to the City for re- building permits for view and approval residential lots that building plans that mini- abut commercial mize windows for those and/or office corn- residential units that look onto commercial and/or office profes- sional existing and planned uses. Responsible Party__ Planning Dept. mercial zoned areas. Building Dept. Initials Date Remarks LAND USE (Continued) 4.1.6C An 8-foot slump block wall shall be constructed along the common property line which separates the resi- dential and non-residential use. The base of the wall shall be planted with a 16-foot wide buffer (8 feet of landscap- ing on each side of the wall). Landscaping materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 4.1.6D The CC &Rs for any residential unit abutting upon a non-residential use shall disclose the presence of the adjacent non-residential use and, to the extent possible describe the potential nuisances which might be generated by the non-residential use. 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 l',FinalI_EIR\M ITMON.FtN) The developer shall submit to the City for review and approval landscaping and build- ing plans for those resi- dential units that abut commercial and/or of- rice professional exist- ing and planned uses. The developer shall sub- Prior to issuance of mir to the City a copy of the first certificate of the CC &Rs for all resi- occupancy for any dential development that residential unit for abuts existing and any tract that abuts planned non-residential existing and planned uses. non-residential land uses. Prior to issuance of building permits for residential lots that abut commercial and/or office com- mercial zoned areas. Planning Dept. Planning Dept. G-3 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures 4.1.6E No residential or non-residential use shall gener- ate noise, odors, or unnecessary light, glare or shadow beyond the property line of said use. 4.1.6F A 20-foot landscape and 25-foot additional rear yard buffer shall be provided on the north side of Church Street between Etiwanda Avenue and Day Creek Boule- vard. Landscaping materials shall contain a variety of species used to buffer traffic noise and light and glare from potential commercial uses south of Church Street The landscape design shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Monitoring and Reporting Process The applicant shall sub- mit a lighting plan for any commercial build- ing. The applicant shall sub- mit to the City for re- view and approval a landscaping plan for areas that will require a 20- to 25-foot rear yard buffer. Monitoring Responsible Milestones Party. Prior to of building Planning Dept. permits for any com- mercial building. Prior to issuance of Planning Dept. building permits for any unit north of Church Street be- tween Etiwanda Ave- nue and Day Creek Engineering Boulevard. Dept. Initials Date Remarks TRAFFIC 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \Finalt_EIR\MITMON.FIN). G-4 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL I~NVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures 4.2.1A, The project proponent shall contribute a traffic t~e in accordance with the City% adopted traffic t~e pro- gram for backbone infrastructure (Transportation Depart- oper. ment Impact Fee Ordinance No. 445) as the project's fair share contribution to additional circulation improvements identified as necessary to maintain an acceptable level of service as identified in a Traffic Impact Analysis, Appli- cant shall make a fair share contribution to traffic mitigations as determined by the City Engineer, These additional circulation improvements shall consist of the following: Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Party Payment of traffic fees Applicant shall make City Engineer to the City by the devel- a fair share contribu- tion to traffic mitigations as deter- mined by the City Engineer. Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By 2015, the addition of a northbound right turn lane. Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By pro- ject opening, the addition of a third castbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a third westbound through lane and a northbound right turn lane. Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - By project opening, the addition of a west- bound free right turn lane. Victoria Park Lane/Base Line Road - By pro- ject opening, the addition of an eastbound right turn lane. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a southbound right tun lane and a second westbound left turn lane. Eftwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue - By 2015, the addition of a northbound right turn lane and a southbound right turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Victoria Street - By 2015, signalization. Initials Date Remarks 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \FinalI_EIR\MITMON,FIN) G-5 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures TRAFFIC (Continued) 10. 11. 12. Etiwanda Avenue/Base Line Road - By 2015, modification of signal timing to provide a cycle length of less than 130 seconds. Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street-Miller Ave- nue - By project opening, signalization. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a northbound left turn lane, a north- bound right turn lane, a southbound left turn lane, a southbound right turn lane, an eastbound left turn lane, an eastbound right turn lane, a westbound left turn lane, and a westbound right turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By 2015, the addition of a northbound through lane, a northbound free right turn lane, and a south- bound through lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route - By project opening, the addition of a northbound through lane. By 2015, fuRher improvements include the addition of a second northbound left turn lane, a third noahbound through lane, a southbound through lane, and a second eastbound left turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue - By 2015, the addition of a third northbound through lane and a third southbound through lane. East Avenue/Base Line Road - By 2015, the addition of a northbound left turn lane, an east- bound right turn lane, and a westbound right turn lane. Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones ParW Initials Date Remarks 4/28/99{R:\CRG831 \FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-6 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures TRAFFIC (Continued) 13. 14. Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a second eastbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition of a second northbound left turn lane, a second northbound through lane, a southbound right turn lane, and an eastbound right turn lane. 1-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a westbound free right turn lane and a second westbound left turn lane. By 2015, further improvements in- clude the addition of a second southbound right turn lane. 15. I-15 Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a second east- bound left, and-the conversion of the north- bound right turn lane to a free right turn lane and the addition of a second northbound left turn lane. By 2015, further improvements in- clude the addition of a second northbound right turn lane and a third westbound through lane. Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Date 4/28/99(R:~CRG831 \FinaII_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-7 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures TRAFFIC (Continued) 4.2.1B. Circulation improvements have been identified to achieve standards levels of service (i.e, local jurisdiction and/or SANBAG) at study area intersections. To address the timing, funding, and implementation of these im- provements, the following mitigation measure or condi- tion of approval is recommended: Prior to the approval of any tract map, a traffic study shall be completed to determine whether the incremental increase in traffic from the tract map area causes any of the intersections under investigation to result in un~tisfacto~ levels of service. If unacceptable levels of service result, this traffic analysis shall determine the portion of the ultimate intersections' improvements that are required, the phasing of the improvement, and the funding source. 4.2.2. The project shall contribute on a fair-share basis to the cost of providing the following freeway lane addi- tions: SR-30 Eastbound LA County Line to 1-15 - addition of two lanes 1-15 to Alder Avenue - addition of one lane SR-30 Westbound LA County line to 1-15 - addition of two lane 1-15 to Alder Avenue - addition of one lane Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Part' A traffic study shall be prepared by the devel- oper and submitted to the City for review and approval. The developer shall provide evidence to the City of compliance with the Congestion Manage- ment Agency. Prior to the approval Engineering of any tract map. Dept. Prior to approval of Engineering Final Tract Map. Dept. Initials Date Remarks 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \FinalI_E1R\MITMON.FIN) G-8 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX F. NVlRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures TRAFFIC (Continued) · 1-10 Eastbound LA County line to Euclid Avenue - addition of four lanes Euclid Avenue to Vineyard Avenue - addition of three lanes Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue - addi- tion of two lanes Archibald Avenue to Milliken Avenue - addi- tion of three lanes Milliken Avenue to I-1 $ - addition of four lanes I-1 $ to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Parr Initials Date Remarks 1-10 Westbound LA County linc to Monte Vista - addition of three lanes Monte Vista to Milliken Avenue - addition of two lanes Milliken Avenue to I- I $ - addition of three lanes 1-15 to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes - 1-15 Northbound Jurupa Avenue to I-10 - addition of one lane I-10 to Cherry Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-15 Southbound Sierra Avenue to Jurupa Avenue - addition of one lane 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I~,FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-9 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE AIR QUALITY Monitoring and Monitoring Mitigation Measures Reporting Process Milestones 4.3.1A. The Construction Contractor shall select the con- Applicant shall submit struction equipment used onsite based on low emission to the City proof that the factors and high energy efficiency. The Construction mitigation listed is in- Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans eluded in the construe- include a statement that all construction equipment will be tion documents with the tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufac- developer's contractor. turer's specifications. Prior to issuance of grading permits. 4.3.1B. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of or diesel-powered equipment in lieu of gasoline=powered to the City proof that the grading permits. engines where feasible. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construc- tion documents with the developer's contractor. 4.3.1C. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of construction grading plans include a statement that work to the City proof that the grading permits. crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During mitigation listed is in- smog season (May through October), the overall length of eluded in the construc- the construction period should be extended, thereby de- tion documents with the creasing the size of the area prepared each day, to mini- developer's contractor. mize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. 4.3.1D. The Construction Contractor shall time the con- struction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be re- tained to maintain safety adjacent to existing roadways. Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of to the City proof that the grading permits. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construc- tion documents with the developer's contractor. 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\Finall EIR\MITMONFIN) Responsible Parr Building & Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Building & Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Building & Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Building & Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Initials Dat~ Remarks G-10 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures AIR QUALITY (Continued) Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Par~ 4.3.1 E. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the con- struction crew. 4.3.1F. The developer shall install bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of to the City proof that the grading permits. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construc- tion documents with the developer's contractor. Building & Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Applicant shall submit to the City for review and approval a bicycle trails plan. Prior to issuance of Planning Dept. any grading permits. Planning DepL Field inspections dur- ing grading. 4.3.1G. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by fol- lowing the dust control measures listed below. a. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of or transportation of cut or fill materials, water to the City proof that the grading permits. trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent mitigation listed is in- dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after eluded in the construe- each day's activities cease. tion documents with the developer's contractor. Building & Safety Dept. Initials Date Remarks 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-11 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FlNAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures AIR QUALITY (Continued) During construction, water trucks or sprinkler sys- tems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leav- ing the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Party Initials Applicant shall submit Field inspections dur- Applicant shall to the City proof that the ing grading. pay for mitiga- mitigation listed is in- tion monitor eluded in the construe- hired by City. tion documents with the developer's contractor. Prior to issuance of Building & grading permits. Safety Dept. Date Remarks After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excava- tion is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. Field inspections dur- Applicant shall ing grading. pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & to the City proof that the grading permits. Safety Dept. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construe- Field inspections dur- Applicant shall tion documents with the ing grading, pay for mitiga- developer's contractor. tion monitor hired by City. Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & to the City proof that the grading permits. Safety Dept. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construc- Field inspections dur- Applicant shall tion documents with the ing grading. pay for mitiga- developer's contractor. tion monitor hired by City. 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-12 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures AIR QUALITY (Continued) Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. 4.3.1H The Construction Contractor shall utilize as much as possible precoated/natural colored building materials, water-based or 1ow-VOC coating, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or man- ual coatings application such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge~ 4.3.2A. The project shall comply with Title 24 of the Cal- ifornia Code of Regulations established by the Energy Commission regarding energy conservation standards. The project applicant shall incorporate the following in building plans: Planting trees to provide shade and shadow to building; Solar or low-emission water heaters shall be used with combined space/water heater unit; Refrigerator with vacuum power insulation; Double-pained glass or window treatment for energy conservation shall be used in all exterior windows; and Energy-efficient low-sodium parking lot lights shall be used. Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Party Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of Building & to the City proof that the grading permits. Safety Dept. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construe- Field inspections dur- Applicant shall tion documents with the ing grading. developer's contractor. Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of to the City proof that the building permits. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construc- tion documents with the developer's contractor. pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Building & Safety Dept. Applicant shall prepare and submit building plans and landscaping plans to the City for re- view and approval that contain the listed mitiga- tion. Prior to issuance of building permits. Building & Safety Dept. City's Engineer- ing Dept. Initials Date Remark~ 1 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \Finall EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-13 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures AIR QUALITY (Continued) 4.3.3A. Use of transportation demand measures (TDM) such as preferential parking for van pooling/car pooling, subsidy for transit pass or van pooling/car pooling, flex- time work schedule, bike racks, lockers, showers, and onsite cafeteria shall be incorporated in the design of the commercial land uses. 4.3.4B. The project proponent shall determine with the City and the electrical purveyor if it is feasible to pre-wire houses for electrical charges for EV cars and/or optic fi- bers for home offices. If feasible, install EV charges and/or optic-fibers per the e!ec.~ca! purveyor's direction prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 4.3.4C. Install EV charges or electrical fuel sta- tions/natural gas for community wide use at key commer- cial and public location(s) such as park and ride lots, Metrolink Station, and commercial centers. 4.3.4D. The developer shall contract with a mitigation monitor to assure compliance and implementation with the mitigation monitoring program. Monitoring and I Monitoring ] Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Party The applicant shall pre- pare and submit to the City for review and ap- proval development plans that incorporate the listed TDM mea- sures. The applicant shall sub- mit to the City written evidence that he/she has consulted with the dec- tfical purveyor and the City. The developer shall pre- pare and submit to the City for review and ap- proval building plans that incorporate the miti- gation. The developer shall submit to the City evi- dence that the developer has contracted with a mitigation monitor to implement the mitiga- tion monitoring pro- gram. Prior to issuance of Building & building permits. Safety Dept. Planning Dept. Prior to issuance of a Planning Dept. certificate of occu- pancy. Prior to issuance of Building & building permits for Safety Dept. any commercial building. Field inspections Building & prior to issuance of a Safety Dept. certificate of occu- pancy. Planning Dept. Prior to issuance of Planning Dept. grading permits. Initials Date Remarks 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G- 14 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures NOISE 4.4.1A. During all project site excavation and grading on- site, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards. Monitoring and Monitoring Reporting Process ~ Milestones Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of to the City proof that the grading permits. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construc- tion documents with the developer's contractor. 4.4.1B. The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors to the east of the site. Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of to the City proof that the grading permits. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construe- Field inspections dur- tion documents with the ing grading. developer's contractor. 4.4.1C. The construction contractor shall locate equip- ment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise sen- sitive receptors to the east of the site during all project construction. 4.4.1D. During all project site construction, the construc- tion contractor shall limit all construction-related activi- ties that would result in high noise levels to between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Satur- day, unless such construction activities do not result in noise levels exceeding 45 dBA at residences to the east of the site. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of to the City proof that the grading permits. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construc- tion documents with the developer's contractor. Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of to the City proof that the grading permits. mitigation listed is in- cluded in the construc- tion documents with the developer's contractor. Party Initials Date Building & Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Building & Safety Dept. Building & Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Building & Safety Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Prior to issuance of grading per- mits. Applicant shall pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Rentarks 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \FinalI_ElR\MITMON.FIN) G-15 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ]MPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures NOISE (Continued) 4.4.2. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final map ap- proval for residential units proposed within the following areas: · Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road be- tween future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; · Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road be- tween Victoria Park Lane and Eftwanda Avenue; · Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street be- tween Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boule- vard; · Within 194 feet of the centerline of Church Street be- tween future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Ave- nue; · Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Base Line Road and Church Street; and · Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard between Church Street and Foothill Boule- vard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Party The applicant shall sub- Prior to approval of mit noise studies to the Final Tract Map. City for review and ap- proval for residential units within the listed areas. Planning Dept. Applicant shall pay for mitiga- tion monitor hired by City. Initials Date Remarks 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 l\FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-16 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL [~NVIRONMENTAL [MPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures PUBLIC SERVICES Schools 4.5.1A. The developer shall be required to execute an agreement with Etiwanda School District and Chaffey Unified High School District to provide adequate mitiga- tion. Such an agreement shall be executed prior to Plan- ning Commission approval for any residential project within the General Plan Amendment area. Actual imple- mentation of the agreement by the payment of fees, dedi- cation of sites or other mitigation will take place as build- ing permits are obtained. iMonitoring and I Monitoring I Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Party The developer shall sub- Prior to the issuance Building & reit to the City a copy of of building permits Safety Dept. a school mitigation plan for any residential executed between the unit. developer and the Etiwanda School Dis- trict. The developer shall sub- Prior to the issuance Building & mir to the City a copy of of braiding permits Safety Dept. a school mitigation plan for any residential executed between the unit. developer and the Chaffey Unified High School District. Initials Date Remar_~ 4.5.1B. In the event that the developer declines to execute Ifa mitigation agree- Prior to Planning a mitigation agreement, the City shall require full mitiga- merit is not executed, the Commission ap- tion as a condition of approval. Full mitigation shall be developer shall form a proval for any resi- accomplished by means of a requirement to form a Mello- Mello-RoosCommunity dentialunit. Roos Community Facilities district for school facilities. Facilities District. In order to reduce the burden on the future homeowners, it is possible to structure the community facilities district such that some of the special taxes would be prepaid by the developer. Planning Dept. 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-17 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures Parks and Recreation 4.5.2(1)A. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 24.76 acres of parkland either by fee or by dedication. 4.5.2(i)B. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedica- tion of property for 24.76 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City de- sires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tenta- tive tract map when submitted and a General Plan amend- ment indicating the location of any park shall be pro- cessed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 4.5.2(1)C. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are required, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Party__ The developer shall exe- Prior to approval of cute an agreement with the Final Tract Map. the City to dedicate parkland or pay in lieu fees as determined by the City's Park and Rec- reation Commission. Planning Dept. Parks & Recre- ation Dept. The City Park and Rec- At the time of filing a Parks & Recre- reation Commission tentative tract map or ation Dept. shall determine whether a minor subdivision dedication of property plat for approval. for 24.76 acres ofpark and recreational pur- poses or in lieu of fees are necessary. The developer shall sub- At the time of filing a Planning Dept. mit an application for a tentative tract map or General Plan Amend- a minor subdivision ment for the location of plat for approval. any park. The developer shall ei- Prior to issuance of Building & ther execute a dedication building permits. Safety Dept. agreement with the City or pay established fees. Parks & Recre- ation Dept. Initials Date Remarks 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \FinaII_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-18 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA .ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures PUBLIC SERVICES (Continued) 4.5.2(2)A. The parkway on the east side of"future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be widened by 20 to 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "fu- ture" Day Creek Boulevard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan de- sign. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Eftwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adja- cent to Interstate 15. 4.5.2(2)B. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and com- munity trail system within the Victoria Community Plan. 4.5.2(2)C. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connect- ing existing trails to the regional center within the Victo- ria Community Plan area. Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Par~ The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of mit to the City for re- view and approval a trails plan for the park- way on the east side of Day Creek Boulevard incorporating the stated mitigation. Planning Dept. any development plans adjacent to Day Parks & Recre- Creek Boulevard. ation Dept. The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of mit for review and ap- any development proval a detailed design plans. and trails plan in accor- dance with the Victoria Community Plan. The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of mit for review and ap- any development proval the trails plan for plans. the project in accor- dance with the Victoria Community Plan. Planning Dept. Parks & Recre- ation Dept. Planning Dept. Parks & Recre- ation Dept. Initials Date Remarks 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-19 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures Police 4.5.3A. As stated in the General Requirements and Ap- provals for the Police Department for the City, a signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law En- forcement Community Facilities District shall be filed with City Engineering prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first for any projects within the project area between Base Line Road and 1-15. Formation costs shall be borne by the de- veloper. 4.5.4A. The developer shall join the Mello-Roos Com- ~nunity Facilities District to provide fire protection ser- vices to the site. Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones ParW The developer shall sign Prior to final map a consent and waiver approval within the form to join and/or form project area between the Law Enforcement Base Line Road & 1- Community Facilities 15. District. A copy of the signed form shall be submitted to the City's Engineering Depart- ment. The developer shall join Prior to issuance of a Mello-Roos Commu- building permits. nity Facilities District for fire protection. Engineering Dept. FireDept. Building& SafetyDept. Initials Date 4.5.4B. The developer shall install automated fire sprin- kler systems in commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential units in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 15 and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 22. AESTHETIC/VISUAL The developer shall submit to the City for review and approval building plans that in- clude automated fire sprinkler systems. 4.6.1A. New buildings within 100 feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35 feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Plan- ning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied structures within 100 prior to building plan approvals. feet from Day Creek Boulevard Prior to issuance of building permits. The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of mit to the City for re- any development view and approval de- plans for structures velopment plans for within 100 feet from Day Creek Boule- vard. Fire Dept. Building & Safety Dept. Planning Dept. Building & Safety Dept. 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 t\FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-20 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures AESTHETIC/VISUAL (Continued) 4.6.1B. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of"visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an ade- velopment plans for quate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the noise walls along Day sound wall. This requirement shall be attached as a con- Creek Boulevard. dition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. 4.6,1C. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new de- Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Party_ The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of mit to the City for re- any development view and approval de- bordering future Day Creek Boulevard., Etiwanda Avenue and Church Street. The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of mit to the City for re- any development Planning Dept. City Planner velopment from the view of motorists along I- 15 looking view and approval land- plans for develop- north. However, this landscaping should also allow views scape plans for any de- meat adjacent and in City Engineer north towards the mountains, using the view corridor pro- velopment in the area of the vicinity of I- 15. v ided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda I-15. Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any develop- ment in the area of I-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 4.6.2A. The Design Review process for commercial es- The developer shall sub- Prior to development Planning Dept. tablishments and public places shall ensure that no signifi- reit to the City for re- plan approval by the cant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed view and approval de- City's Design Re- project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of de- velopment plans that view Committee. sign review shall include the following: proposed exterior indicate the type and lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible location of exterior lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exte- lighting. rior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. Parks & Recre- ation Dept. Initials Date Remarks 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinaII_E1RX, MITMON.FIN) G-21 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures AESTHETIC/VISUAL (Continued) 4.6.2.B. The developer shall account for the loss of the aesthetic benefit of the lakes by providing a new focal point concept within residential area to be submitted for Design Review. The focal point concept could include an open space trail system linkage to the winery site and commercial areas to the south by an open space corridor, and incorporate such features as a fountains, large gazebo, public art, public furniture, and/or increased open space/ trails systems. Monitoringand{Monitoring{Responsible! Reporting Process , Milestones . Party : Initials ~ Date The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of mit for review and ap- development plans proval by the City's De- by the City's Design sign Review Committee Review Committee. a new focal point con- cept within the residen- tial area. 4.6.3A. Provisions shall be made to account for protec- tion of view sheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include the follow- ing: building setbacks within the project site; varied al- lowable heights with lower heights nearest the inter- changes; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to com- Church Street. plement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing condi- tions of approval for any projects within the proposed pro- ject corridor. The developer shall sub- Prior to approval of mit to the City for re~ development plans view and approval land- by the City's Design scape plans for major Review Committee. intersections along Day Creek Boulevard, Victo- ria Park Lane, and 4.6.3B. To reduce potential conflicts with policies of the Implement mitigation City's Community Design Element, recommended mitiga- under 4.6.1 tion measures found under 4.6.1 shall also be imple- mented. Prior to issuance of building permits. Planning Dept. Planning Dept. Planning Dept. Remarks J 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-22 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures 4.6.3C. The Community Design Criteria Part II of the Victoria Community Plan shall be amended immediately following project approval to address new uses proposed as part of the project. However, as part of this amend- ment, some requirements shall be included to reduce vi- sual impacts of new development by inclusion of land- scaping near major roads that matches those proposed by the Plan. For example, trees shall be planted along the site's property lines and along roadways to screen new development from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east-west corridors, the City shall designate areas for landscaping, ensuring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with low-growing vegetation to maintain a degree of visual open space on the pr~ect site. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 4.7.3A Minimize the amount of coastal sage scrub lost as the result of development (i.e., preserve the majority of the habitat on site) through project and construction rede- sign, and purchase off-site lands to compensate for those areas of coastal sage scrub impacted. Monitoring and Reporting Process The City shall amend the Community Design Criteria Part II of the Victoria Community Plan per the stated miti- gation. Applicant shall submit development plans to the City that preserve coastal sage scrub onsite. OR Applicant shall submit to the City proof that participation in an off- site mitigation bank is or will occur. Monitoring Responsible Milestones Party Prior to approval of Planning Dept. tentative tract map. Prior to issuance of grading permits. Planning Dept. Initials Date Remarks 4/28/99(R:\CRG83 I\FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-23 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Continued) 4.7.3B Restore (to ensure no-net-loss of acreage and quality) coastal sage scrub in annual grassland and/or abandoned vineyards to compensate for the loss of these habitats from elsewhere on site. 4.7.3C Participate in off-site mitigation bank (i.e., Team Arundo) to provide compensation for the loss of 0.4 acre of mixed willow series, Monitoring and Monitoring Responsible Reporting Process Milestones Party Applicant shall have a restoration plan pre- pared by a qualified res- toration biologist and submitted to the City for review and approval. Applicant shall submit Prior to issuance of to the City proof that last Certificate of participation in an off- Occupancy on the site mitigation bank is or last residential unit. will occur. Applicant shall submit to the City proof that participation in an off- site mitigation bank is or will occur. Prior to issuance of grading permits. Planning Dept. Planning Dept. Initials Date Remarks 4.7.3D Purchase and preserve (in perpetuity) off-site lands to provide substitute resources for the coastal sage scrub that would be lost through project construction. Suitable lands would support coastal sage scrub and would be in a location that would facilitate management of this habitat type, such as adjoining the North Eftwanda Preserve. Given the disturbed condition of habitat on the project site, a less than 1:1 replacement ratio. Prior to issuance of last Certificate of Occupancy on the last residential unit. Prior to issuance of last Certificate of Occupancy on the last residential unit. Planning Dept. Planning Dept. 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \FinaII_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-24 MITIGATION MONITORING MATRIX FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE Mitigation Measures BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Continued) 4.7.5A If the City desires to eliminate the retention of the wetland on site, an individual 404 permit shall bc ob- tained from the Corps by the applicant. Mitigation re- quired by the Corps may include creation or enhancement of off-site wetland habitat at a ratio of at least 1:1 and as high as 3:1 (i.e., 3 acres created for each acre impacted). Provisions of the permit shall bc adhered to prior to the issuance of grading permits for the area which contains the wetland. CULTURAL RESOURCES 4.8.1. In the event a cultural resource is uncovered during The applicant shall pro- the course of the project, ground disturbing activities in vide evidence that the the vicinity of the find should bc rcdirected until the ha- language in the mitiga- turc and extent of the find can bc evaluated by a qualified tion has bccn incorpo- archaeologist. rated in the contractor's construction plans. If human remains arc encountered, the San Bernardino County Coroner must bc notified within 24 hours. Ifthe coroner determines that the burial is not historic, but pre- historic, the Native American Heritage Coramission must bc contacted to determine the most likely descendent (MLD) for this area. The MLD may become involved with the disposition of the burial. Reporting Process Milestones Partv Initials Date The applicant shall ap- Prior to issuance of ply for an individual 404 any grading permits permit for the U.S. for the area contain- Army Corps of Engi- ing the wetland. neers. A copy of the executed permit shall be submitted to the City for its files. Prior to issuance of any grading permit. Building Dept. Planning Dept. Building Dept. Planning Dept. Remarks 4/28/99(R:\CRG831 \FinalI_EIR\MITMON.FIN) G-25 EIR FOR GPA 98-02, VCPA 98-01 AND ESPA 98-01 STATEMENT OF FACTS AND FINDINGS EXHIBIT "E" LSA Associates, Inc. EXHIBIT A STATEMENT OF FACTS AND FINDINGS FOR THE VICTORIA ARBORS VILLAGE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT INTRODUCTION The following statement of findings and facts in support of findings is adopted for each environmental impact identified in the Final EIR (FEIR) as significant or poten- tially significant. For a more detailed description of each impact, each mitigation measure to be imposed, and the facts and data which support the conclusions reached herein regarding the significance of each impact after mitigation, please refer to the applicable sections of the FEIR and the technical appendices. The City Council hereby adopts and incorporates the data and analysis set forth therein as a part of this Resolution as though set forth here in full. /. Description of Project Objectives ~he proposed project consists of approximately 291.8 acres. Of the total, the applicant, American Beauty Development Corporation, has proposed multiple land use amend- ments to approximately 192.4 acres within the Victoria Community Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. In addition, amendments to the circulation and open space elements of the Victoria Community Plan would be required. The proposed land use amendments would result in the conversion of 64.3 acres of multifamily to single family residential; 58.76 acres of regional related office com- mercial to single family residential, medium density residential and high density residential; 18.74 acres of open space and lakes to residential; and 13.28 acres of multifamily residential to a school-park; 2.9 acres of community facilities to single family residential and 8.44 of low-medium density residential to low density single family residential in the Victoria Community Plan area (see Figures 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5). Approximately 26 acres of office/professional is proposed to be converted to single family residential in the Etiwanda Specific Plan (Figure 3.3). The proposed project is part of the larger future master planned village (291.8 acres) in, the Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan. It would facilitate a development proposal consisting of 186.0 acres of single family development, 18.6 acres of multiple family development, 10.6 acres for a school, 9.1 acres for a neigh- borhood/wetland park, 6.7 acres of linear park, and 55.4 acres of commercial develop- ment. Project Objectives · To provide a compact, inwardly-oriented community thematically tied to the historic winery and viticulture. · To provide housing types and locations that is conducive to the family orien- tation of the village. 5/~ 3/99(R:\CRG83 l'dainal Recirc EIRXFindings~FIND1NGS.WPD) LSA Associates, Inc. To provide a mix of housing types oriented around a centrally located neigh- borhood school and park. To provide regional and village-scale trails and walkways with linear parks that will link the village to the adjoining community and commercial facilities to the south. To provide enhanced open space features and resting places to reinforce the village's connection to the regional trail system and adjoining uses. To restore a wetland area on site by designating the area a wetland park. Evaluation of Alternatives For purposes of analyzing potential environmental impacts, the EIR evaluated the proposed project and four alternatives. The four alternatives evaluated are the No Project Alternative (as required by CEQA), Existing Vietom Community Plan and Eftwanda Specific Plan, Low Medium Density Residential, and School/Park Alterna- tives.. These Statement of Facts and Findings address the proposed project as the alternative to be considered for approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to staff's recommendation. Characteristics of the preferred alternative are provided herein. The fbllowing is a brief &scription of the alternatives considered, see Section 6.0 of the FiEIR for more detail. Environmentally Superior Alternative The No Project/No Development Alternative is an Environmentally Superior Alterna- tive since no development would occur on the project site. Unlike the proposed project or the project alternatives, the No Project/No Development Alternative would not increase demand for public services, increase traffic volumes, circulation, air emissions, and noise levels (associated with construction and operation of additional land uses), cause the additional need for recreational facilities, or increase potential impacts to biological or cultural resources, land use incompatibilities, and aesthetics that may otherwise result from development of the project site. Significant short-term construction emissions would be eliminated, and significant unavoidable long-term CO, ROC, and NOx emissions would be reduced with the No Project/No Development Alternative. As required by CEQA (Section 15126(d)(4), if the No Project/No Development Alter- native is selected as the environmentally superior alternative, the EIR shall also iden- tify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives. Among the alternatives considered, there was not an alternative to the proposed project that would contain a development scenario that would not have a significant adverse impact on air quality. Even after mitigation is implemented, the Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative, the Low-Medium Alternative, and the 5/] 3/99(R:\CRG83 l',Final Recirc EIR~Findingg~FINDINGS.WPD) /q/ LSA Associates, Inc. School/Park Alternative would continue to have unavoidable adverse impacts on air quality. Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative has the least damaging environmental impacts on aesthetics with the inclusion of lakes and associated open space. Of the viable alternatives, the School and Park Alternative would result in a slight increase in daily and peak hour vehicle trips and contaminant emissions but when compared with the proposed project all other impacts are gener- ally considered the same. There would, however, be an increase in the available open space with this alternative by providing an open space trail system from the winery through the adjacent park south to Church Street. This would result in less impacts on open space than for the proposed project. There are economic impacts to the City with the implementation of Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative. If the site is to contain the lakes and open space area proposed in the Victoria Lakes Village, the City would have to provide long-term maintenance of the area. The cost to maintain the lakes and open space may cause an additional burden on the City residents depending on how the City chooses to provide funding. In light of Proposition 218, additional use taxes would have to go to City wide vote. Long-term funding for the open space and lakes is not certain. I~ow-Medium Density Alternative provided a more logical land use alternative to the impacts associated with increase noise and potential incompatibility issues of locating office commercial uses (OP) adjacent to single family residences (LM). This alterna- tive would require changing OP to LM in the Etiwanda Specific Plan area between Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Lo,op. However, there still exists the potential impacts of noise and increases pollutants by locating LM adjacent to the 1-15 corridor in the area of Church Street. This is also an impact of the proposed project. 7'brough the analysis in Section 4.0 of the FEIR and the alternatives analysis in this section, it was determined that the proposed project is the environmentally superior alternative. As discussed above none of the alternatives with the exception of the No Build/No Development Alternative reduces the long-term impacts on air quality. With implementation of proposed mitigation, the proposed project's impacts on land use, traffic, noise, aesthetics, park:s, open space, schools, police, biological resources and cultural resources have been reduced to levels of less than significant. No Project Alternative Under the No Project/No Development Alternative, the project site would remain in its existing vacant condition. Most of the potential impacts associated with the pro- posed project would be avoided, especially the proposed project's impacts on air quality which remain significant after mitigation. Evaluation of the No Proje. ct Alternative The No Project/No Development Alternative would reduce and/or eliminate all potentially significant adverse environmental impacts of the proposed pro- ject. In particular, significant adverse impacts related to short-term consmac- 5/[ 3/99(R:\CRG831LFinal Recirc EIR~Findings\FINDINGS.WPD) LSA Associates, Inc. tion emissions and long-term local CO, ROC, and NOx that would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds for daily operations by a large margin (especially NOx), would not occur with this alternative. However, this alternative would result in impacts by elimi- nating opportunities to provide housing and meet the goals of the City's Gen- eral Plan Housing Element. This alternative would fail to meet three important objectives of the project and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The first objective is to preserve the single family character of residential neighborhoods within the City and provide a variety of housing types for various income levels; the second ob- jective is to protect the neighborhood quality and residential nature of the neighborhood to the east; 'the third objective is to provide infill residential and commercial development within the context of a planned community l~Xisting Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative Ilais alternative suggests that the project site be developed under the approved plans of the Victoria Community Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Under the Victoria Lakes Village Plan of the Victoria Community Plan, the proposed project is desig- nated for higher residential densities. The character of the lakes was to be formed by the unique relationship of the residential, commercial, and recreational land uses surrounding a system of three terraced lakes that are designated as the village open space. Under this alternative, the 25.48 acres residing in the Etiwanda Specific Plan of the proposed project would remain Office/Professional as designated in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Evaluation of the Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan ~tlternative The Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alterna- tive would reduce but not eliminate all potentially significant adverse envi- ronmental impacts of the proposed project. In particular, significant adverse impacts related to short-term construction emissions and long-term local CO, ROC, and NOx that would exceed the SCAQMD thresholds for daily opera- tions by a large margin would still occur with this alternative. However, this alternative would result in potentially greater impacts to air quality, noise and traffic because the approved Victoria Community and Etiwanda Specific Plans in this area propose a greater number of dwelling units and intensity of land use. This alternative would slightly increase the need for public services such as police and fire but especially schools. The proposed project provides for an elementary school site to house all elementary school students generated by the proposed project. The approved Victoria Community Plan does not pro- vide for a school site and would have a significant adverse impact on elemen- tary schools in the area. This alternative would reduce the aesthetic impacts (open space) of the pro- posed project by providing more open space acreage in the form of a tiered 5/[ 3/99(R:\CRG831LFinal Recirc EIRLFindingsXFINDINGS.WPD) 4 LSA Associates, Inc. lake feature from Base Line Road south to Church Street. This linear feature would include active park space and a trails system. The proposed project includes a trails system that is in conformance with the requirements of the Victoria Community Plan. This trail would tie the trail system north of Base Line Road to trails planned south of Church Street and west to Day Creek Channel. The proposed project also includes a 7.1-acre active community park adjacent to a 10.6-acre school site. Both the proposed project and this alternative lack the required park space needed to meet the needs of the planned increase in population. Mitigation would be required of both the proposed project and this alternative to reduce impacts to parks to less than significant. There are economic impacts to the City with the implementation of The Exist- ing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Alternative. If the site is to contain the lakes and open space area proposed in the Victoria Lakes Village, the City would have to provide long-term maintenance of the area. The cost to maintain the lakes and open space may cause an additional burden on the City residents depending on how the City chooses to provide funding. In light of Proposition 218, additional use taxes would have to go to City wide vote. Long-term funding for the open space and lakes is not certain. Low-Medium Density Residential Alternative Under the Low-Medium alternative, the project site would be developed to have low- medium density residential north of Church Street, south of Base Line Road, between Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Loop. This land use category allows for low medium density single family residential (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) which is appropriate in proximity to major community facilities, employment opportunities, and thorough- illres. The Office Professional designation would be eliminated and replaced with the Low-Medium designation (Figure 6.1). The low-medium density residential is the most common use in the proposed project and the addition of this use along Etiwanda Avenue would be compatible with what: is proposed. Evaluation of the Low-Medium Density Alternative With the exception of potential impacts to public services, impacts associated with the Low-Medium iDensity Residential Alternative are either the same/similar or less of a potential impact than those stated in the proposed project. Significant adverse impacts related to short-term construction emis- sions and long-term local CO, ROC, and NOx that would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District thresholds for daily operations by a large margin, would still occur with this alternative. Although this alternative would slightly increase the number of vehicle trips to/from the areas in ques- tion, this increase would not be considered significant. Potentially greater impacts to public services would slightly increase the need for public services such as police and fire, and especially schools. The proposed project provides for an elementary school site to house all elementary school students gener- ated by the proposed project. Adherence to mitigation measures stated in the proposed project will reduce impacts to public services to a less than signifi- cant level. 5/13/99(R:\CRG831\Final Recirc EIR~Findings~'INDINGS.WPD) /¢¢ LSA Associates, Inc. School/Park Alternative Under the School/Park Alternative the school and park would be located adjacent to the winery, south of Base Line Road and west of Victoria Loop. There would also be an open space corridor that would extend from the wetland area west of Victoria I~oop south to Church Street. This alternative would promote an open space feel between the winery and the park and could possibly tie the historic theme of the winery with the park. Proposed land uses west of Etiwanda and north of Church Street would remain Office Professional (OP) and Low-Medium (LM) (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) for the remaining areas between Victoria Loop on the west, Etiwanda Avenue on the east, Base Line to the north and Church Street on the south. This area is all within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. This alternative proposes to leave an OP buffer adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue that includes and Nichiren Shoshu Temple and the existing residen- tial property on the northwest comer of Church Street and Etiwanda. Evaluation of the School/Park Alternative With the exception of potential impacts to public services, impacts associated with the School/Parks Alternative are either the same/similar or less of a potential impact than those stated in the proposed project. Significant adverse impacts related to short-term construction emissions and long-term local CO, ROC, and NOx that would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District thresholds for daily operations by a large margin would still occur with this alternative. Although this alternative would slightly increase the number of vehicle trips to/from the areas in question, this increase would not be considered significant:. Potentially greater impacts to public services would slightly increase the need for public services such as police and fire, and especially schools. The proposed project provides for an elementary school site to house all elementary school students generated by the proposed project as does this altemative. Adherence to mitigation measures stated in the proposed project will reduce impacts to public services to a less than significant level. This alternative would have a beneficial impact on aesthetics by providing a view shed corridor south through the park and school site from travelers on Base Line Road. The location of the park adjacent to the winery may also provide opportunities for activities including historic preservation and vine- yard related experience to occur. However, locating a park in the central portion of the project site can provide for a neighborhood connection to sur- rounding residential development. 5/~ 3/99(R:~CRG831LFinal Recirc EIRWindings~FINDINGS.WPD) 1//5' LSA Associates, Inc. EFFECTS DETERMINED NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT OR MITIGA TED TO A LESS-THAN-SIGNIFICANTLEVEL Land Use Signi. ficant Effect No. 1 lhe proposed project consisting of single family residential would be in conflict with surrounding commercial land uses and adjacent 1-15. The proposed project would create an incompatibility between existing and planned land uses for this area. This incompatibility between the proposed residential and the I- 15 and planned commercial is a potentially significant impact. P¥nding No. 1 C, hanges or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. · ~tcts in Support of Finding No. I Ire potential impacts pertaining to the incompatibility between existing and planned land uses for this area have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-signifi- cant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those measures will ensure that land use compatibility will be obtained through mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.4 (Noise) and 4.6 (Aes- thetics) for those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the project. The mitigation measures are as follows: Noise Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; Within 378 feet of' the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; Within 194 feet of' the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue; Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard be- tween Base Line Road and Church Street; and 5/I 3/99(R:\CRG831 ~Final Recirc EIRLFindings~FINDINGS.WPD) LSA Associates, Inc. Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard be- tween Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. ¸. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This re- quirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. Aesthetics Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along 1-15 looking north. However, this landscaping should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Plannon'. The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. Signt~flcant Effect No. 2 The proposed project conflicts with the adopted land use, open space, and design concept of the Victoria Lakes Village in the Victoria Community Plan. This incom- patibility between these concepts of the Victoria Lakes Village is a potentially signifi- cant impact. Finding No. 2 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. 5/I 3/99(R:\CRG83 l~Final Recirc EIR~indings~INDINGS.WPD) /¢7 £SA Associate& Inc. Facts in Support of Finding No. 2 The potential impacts pertaining to the conflicts with the adopted land use, open space, and design concept of the Victoria Lakes Village in the Victoria Community Plan have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through imple- mentation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those measures will ensure that land use conflicts will be avoided through mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.5 (Public Services) and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the project. The mitigation measures are as follows: Public Services Parks and Recreation The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland by fee or by dedication. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accor- dance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are re- quired, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres ofparkland dedication or fee. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and ap- proval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boule- vard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Commu- nity Plan. 5/13/99(R:\CRG831 \Final Recirc EIRhCindings\FINDINGS.WPD) /6/8' LSA Associates, Inc. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Aesthetics Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along I-15 looking north. However', this landscaping should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural matehals to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. Significant Effect No. 3 The proposed project calls for the elimination of the 19 acres of lake open space, disrupting the physical arrangement of the Victoria Community Plan and especially the Victoria Lakes Village. The elimination of the 19 acres of lakes and open space of the adopted Victoria Village Specific Plan is a potentially significant impact. Finding No. 3 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 3 The potential impacts pertaining to the elimination of 19 acres of lake open space have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those measures will ensure that the elimination of the 19 acres of lake open space will be mitigated through mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.5 (Public Services) and 4.6 (Aesthetics) for those measures that also benefit land use compatibility of the p:roject. The mitigation measures are as follows: Public Services 5/t 3/99(R:~CRG831Lginal Recirc EIR~indingsLFINDINGS.WPD) 10 lqq LSA Associates, Inc. Parks and Recreation The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland there by fee or by dedication. ¸. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accor- dance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are re- quired, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres ofparkland dedication or fee. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and ap- proval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boule- vard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and exist- ing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Speeifie Plan and shall connect the residen- tial areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Commu- nity Plan. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Aesthetics The developer shall account for the loss of the aesthetic benefit of the lakes by providing a new focal point concept within residential area to be submitted for Design Review. The focal point concept could include an open space trail system linkage to the winery site and commercial areas to the south by an open space corridor, and incorporate such features as a fountains, large ga- zebo, public art, public furniture, and/or increased open space/trails systems. 5/I 3/99(R:\CRG831LFinal Recirc EIR~indings\FINDINGS.WPD) 11 LSA Associates, Inc. 10. Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the inter- changes; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. The Community Design Criteria Part II of the Victoria Community Plan shall be amended immediately following project approval to address new uses proposed as part of the project. However, as part of this amendment, some requirements shall be included to reduce visual impacts of new development by inclusion of landscaping near major roads that matches those proposed by the Plan. For example, trees shall be planted along the site's property lines and along roadways to screen new development from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east-west corridors, the City shall designate areas for landscaping, ensuring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with low- growing vegetation to maintain a degree of visual open space on the project site. Significant Effect No. 4 The proposed project would create a residential "island" within the Etiwanda Specific Plan, creating a potentially significant impact. Finding No. 4 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 4 7he potential impacts pertaining to the creation of a residential "island" within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than- significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those measures will ensure that the planned character of the area will be obtained through mitigation measures outlined in sections 4.3 (Air Quality), 4.4 (Noise), 4.5 (Public Services) and 4.6 (Aesthetics). The mitigation measures are as follows: Air Quality The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Con- struction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 5/13/99(R:\CRG831XFinal Recirc EIR\Findings~FINDINGS.WPD) 12 LSA Associates, Inc. ,. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equip- ment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the con- struction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to main- tain safety adjacent to existing roadways. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. The developer shall insta.11 bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water tracks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. do Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. Noise 5/[ 3/99(R:\CRG83 l~inal Recirc EIR~indings\FIND1NGS.WPD) 13 /5o? LSA Associates, Inc. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; Within 194 feet of the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue; Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard be- tween Base Line Road and Church Street; and Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard be- tween Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This re- quirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. Public Services Parks and Recreation 10. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland there by fee or by dedication. 11. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 5/13/99(R:\CRG831Winal Recirc EIR~Findings",FINDINGS.WPD) 14 LS,4 Associates, Inc. 12. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accor- dance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are re- quired, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres ofparkland dedication or fee. 14. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and ap- proval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boule- vard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. 15. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Commu- nity Plan. Aesthetics 16. New buildings within 100 feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35 feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments. 1¸7. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along I-! 5 looking north. However, this landscaping should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of 1-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. 18. The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. Significant Effect No. 5 5/[ 3/99(R:\CRG831 ~Final Recirc EIRWindings\F1NDINGS.WPD) 15 LS,4 ,4ssociates, Inc. l]'he proposed project would also create a "sandwich" effect of residential zones between commercial zones within the Victoria Community Plan, creating a potential significant impact. l~¥nding No. 5 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 5 ~he potential impacts pertaining to the creation of a "sandwich" effect of residential zones between commercial zones within the Victoria Community Plan area have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those mea- sares will ensure that the planned character of the area will be obtained through miti- gation measures outlined in sections 4.3 (Air Quality), 4.4 (Noise), 4.5 (Public Ser- vices) and 4.6 (Aesthetics). The mitigation measures are as follows: Air Quality The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Con- struction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equip- ment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the con- stmction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to main- tain safety adjacent to existing roadways. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. ,, The developer shall install bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and keep to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. 5/t 3/99(R:\CRG831 ~inal Recirc EIR\Findings~ffrlNDINGS.WPD) 16 I5£ LSA Associates, Inc. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later moming and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. Public Services Parks and Recreation The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 20.68 acres of parkland there by fee or by dedication. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for 20.68 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary. If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. 10. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accor- dance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are re- quired, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The developer shall design and construct the park in addition to the 20.68 acres ofparkland dedication or fee. The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and ap- proval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boule- vard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard 5/13/99(R:\CRG831Winal R¢circ EIRWindings~INDINGS.WPD) 17 1,5¢ LSA Associates, Inc. 13. 14. Noise 1,5. 1C Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and exist- ing Wail systems in the Eftwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residen- tial areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent to Interstate 15. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Commu- nity Plan. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; Within 194 feet of'the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue; Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard be- tween Base Line Road and Church Street; and Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard be- tween Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berrn or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-parted windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. Noise walls along future: Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This re- quirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. Aesthetics 5/I 3/99(R:\CRG831Winal Recirc EIRLFindings~INDINGS.WPD) 18 LSA Associates, Inc. 17. ]8. 19. 20. 2¸1. New buildings within 100 feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35 feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments. Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Eftwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This re- quirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along I-15 looking north. However, this landscaping should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of 1-15. The landscape design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner. The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of&sign review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective materials are minimized. Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the inter- changes; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. Significant Effect No. 6 The proposed project would be incompatible with existing land uses such as the Fillipi Winery, the Nichiren Shoshu Temple and a future regional mall, and would create potential significant impacts. Finding No. 6 5/13/99(R:\CRG831Winal Recite EIR\Findings\FINDINGS.WPD) 19 LSA Associates, Inc. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 6 1]~e potential impacts pertaining to the creation of an incompatibility of the proposed project with the Fillipi Winery and the Nichiren Shoshu Temple have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. Those measures will ensure that an incompatibility of land uses will not occur. The mitigation measures are as follows: Lots within the Victoria Arbors Village project with backyards that abut upon commercial or office/professional uses shall be set back 60 feet from the common property line. Homes on lots whose side yards abut commercial or office/profession uses shall be set back 30 feet from the common property line. The number of windows which look onto commercial or office/professional uses shall be minimized. Windows which look upon these uses shall be dou- ble parted. Window insulation shall be sufficient to ensure interior noise levels to 45 dB CNEL. An 8-foot slump block wall shall be constructed along the common property line which separates the residential and non-residential use. The base of the wall shall be planted with a 16-foot wide buffer (8 feet of landscaping on each side of the wall). Landscaping materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. ,, The CC&Rs for any residential unit abutting upon a non-residential use shall disclose the presence of the adjacent non-residential use and, to the extent possible describe the potential nuisances which might be generated by the non-residential use. No residential or non-residential use shall generate noise, odors, or unneces- sary light, glare or shadow beyond the property line of said use. A 20-foot landscape and 25-foot additional rear yard buffer shall be provided on the north side of Church Street between Etiwanda Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. Landscaping materials shall contain a variety of species used to buffer traffic noise and light and glare from potential commercial uses south of Church Street The landscape design shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Traffic and Circulation Significant Effect No. 7 Fifteen intersections are forecast to exceed the minimum LOS standards under 2015 background plus project conditions in one or both peak hours. These are: 5/13/99(R:\CRG83 l~inal Recirc EIR~Findingg~INDINGS.WPD) 20 LSA Associates, Inc. ,. 8. 9. 10. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard Victoria Park Lane/Base Line Road Etiwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue Eftwanda Avenue/Victoria Street Etiwanda Avenue/Base Line Road Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street-Miller Avenue Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Eftwanda Avenue/Arrow Route Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue East Avenue/Base Line Road Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road I-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road I- 15 Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road PYnding No. 7 C, hanges or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Pitcts in Support of Finding No. 7 The potential impacts pertaining to fifteen intersections exceeding the CMP LOS standard under 2015 background plus project conditions in one or both peak hours have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than -significant through implemen- tation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures described below will enable the City to implement its traffic fee program to fired off-site traffic improvements made as a result of the project. The traffic fee program is the most practical and feasible approach to funding traffic mitigation measures in the vicinity of the project. The project proponent shall contribute a traffic fee in accordance with the City's adopted traffic fee program for backbone infrastructure (Transportation Department Impact Fee Ordinance No. 445) as the projeet's fair share contri- bution to additional circulation improvements identified as necessary to main- tain an acceptable level of service as identified in a Traffic Impact Analysis. Applicant shall make a fair share contribution to traffic mitigations as deter- mined by the City Engineer. The additional circulation improvements shall consist of the following: Haven Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By 2015, the addition of a northbound right turn lane. Milliken Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By project opening, the addi- tion of a third eastbound through lane. By 2015, further improve- ments will include the addition of a third westbound through lane and a northbound right turn lane. 5/13/99(R:\CRG83 l'xFinal Recirc EIRWindings\FINDINGS.WPD) 21 LSA Associates, Inc. Day Creek Boulevard/Foothill Boulevard - By project opening, the addition of a westbound free right turn lane. Victoria Park Lane/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addi- tion of an eastbound right turn lane. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a southbound right tun lane and a second westbound left turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Highland Avenue - By 2015, the addition of a northbound right turn lane and a southbound right turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Victoria Street - By 2015, signalization. Eftwanda Avenue/Base Line Road - By 2015, modification of signal timing to provide a cycle length of less than 130 seconds. Etiwanda Avenue/Church Street-Miller Avenue - By project open- ing, signalization. By 2015, further improvements will include the addition of a northbound left turn lane, a northbound right turn lane, a southbound left turn lane, a southbound right turn lane, an eastbound left turn lane, an eastbound right turn lane, a westbound left turn lane, and a westbound right turn lane. Eftwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard - By 2015, the addition of a northbound through lane, a northbound free right turn lane, and a southbound through lane. Etiwanda Avenue/Arrow Route - By project opening, the addition of a northbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements in- clude the addition of a second northbound left turn lane, a third north- bound through lane, a southbound through lane, and a second east- bound left turn lane. Etiwanda Avenue/San Bernardino Avenue - By 2015, the addition of a third northbound through lane and a third southbound through lane. East Avenue/Base Line Road - By 2015, the addition of a north- bound left turn lane, an eastbound right turn lane, and a westbound right turn lane. Cherry Avenue/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a second eastbound through lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition of a second northbound left turn lane, a second northbound through lane, a southbound right turn lane, and an east- bound right turn lane. 1-15 Southbound Ramps/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a westbound free right turn lane and a second westbound left turn lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition of a second southbound right turn lane. 5/'13/99(R:\CRG831 ~Final Recirc EIRL.r:indingsLFINDINGS.WPD) 22 lb/ LSA Associates, Inc. ,. 1-15 Northbound Ramps/Base Line Road - By project opening, the addition of a second eastbound left, conversion of the northbound right turn lane to a free right turn lane and the addition of a second northbound left turn lane. By 2015, further improvements include the addition of a second northbound right turn lane and a third westbound through lane. Circulation improvements have been identified to achieve standards levels of service (i.e., local jurisdiction and/or SANBAG) at study area intersections. To address the timing, funding, and implementation of these improvements, the following mitigation measure or condition of approval is recommended: Prior to the approval of any tract map, a traffic study shall be completed to determine whether the incremental increase in traffic from the tract map area causes any of the intersections under investigation to result in unsatisfactory levels of service. If unacceptable levels of service result, this traffic analysis shall determine the portion of the ultimate intersections' improvements that are required, the phasing of the improvement, and the funding source. Significant Effect No. 8 7he proposed project will contribute to deficiencies along the following freeway sections: ¸, SR-30 Eastbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue SR-30 Westbound - LA County line to Alder Avenue I-10 Eastbound - LA County line to Citrus Avenue I-10 Westbound - LA County line to Citrus Avenue I-15 Northbound - Jurupa Avenue to Sierra Avenue I-15 Southbound - Riverside County line to Sierra Avenue Finding No. 8 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 8 The potential traffic impacts of the proposed project pertaining to deficiencies along the freeway section of SR-30 between Jurupa Avenue and Sierra Avenue. On 1-10 there are deficiencies along the freeway section between LA County line to Citrus Avenue and freeway sections of I-15 between Jurupa Avenue and Sierra Avenue. The traffic impacts within the segments listed have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures described below will erlable the City to collect fees on a fair share basis for freeway lane additions. The traffic fee program is the most practical and feasible approach to funding traffic mitigation measures in the vicinity of the project. 5/13/99(R:\CRG831LFinal Recirc EIR~Findings'ff:INDINGS.WPD) 23 LSA Associates, Inc. The project shall contribute on a fair-share basis to the cost of providing the following freeway lane additions: SR-30 Eastbound LA County Line to I-15 - addition of two lanes I-15 to Alder Avenue - addition of one lane SR-30 Westbound LA County line to I-15 - addition of two lane I-15 to Alder Avenue - addition of one lane 1-10 Eastbound LA County line to Euclid Avenue - addition of four lanes Euclid Avenue to Vineyard Avenue - addition of three lanes Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avenue - addition of two lanes - Archibald Avenue to Milliken Avenue - addition of three lanes - Milliken Avenue to I-15 - addition of four lanes - I-15 to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-10 Westbound - LA County line to Monte Vista - addition of three lanes - Monte Vista to Milliken Avenue - addition of two lanes - Milliken Avenue to 1-15 - addition of three lanes - I-15 to Citrus Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-15 Northbound Jumpa Avenue to I-10 - addition of one lane I-10 to Cherry Avenue - addition of two lanes 1-15 Southbound Sierra Avenue to Jurupa Avenue - addition of one lane 5/13/99(R:\CRG83 l',Final Recirc EIRXFindings~'INDINGS.WPD) 24 LSA Associates, Inc. Air Quality Significant Effect No. 9 Air quality impacts may occur during the site preparation including grading and equipment exhaust as it is used onsite. Major sources of emissions during this phase include exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment and fugitive dust generated as a result of construction vehicles and equipment traveling over exposed surfaces, as well as soil disturbances by grading and filling. Construction equipment emissions would exceed the SCAQMD daily thresholds for the criteria pollutant of NOx, which is 2.5 tons per quarter or 150 pounds per day. Emissions of other criteria pollutants would be below the standards during construction. Finding No. 9 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. P~tcts in Support of Finding No. 9 The potential impacts pertaining to the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) during construction have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: The Construction Contractor shall select the construction equipment used onsite based on low emission factors and high energy efficiency. The Con- struction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The Construction Contractor shall utilize electric or diesel-powered equip- ment in lieu of gasoline-powered engines where feasible. ,, The Construction Contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. During smog season (May through October), the overall length of the con- struction period should be extended, thereby decreasing the size of the area prepared each day, to minimize vehicles and equipment operating at the same time. ,¸ The Construction Contractor shall time the construction activities so as to not interfere with peak hour traffic and minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes adjacent to the site; if necessary, a flagperson shall be retained to main- tain safety adjacent to existing roadways. The Construction Contractor shall support and encourage ridesharing and transit incentives for the construction crew. 5/13/99(R:\CRG831 Winal Recirc EIR~FindingsLFINDtNGS.WPD) 25 LSA Associates, Inc. Significant Effect No. 10 During grading activities dust emission would exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 150 pounds per day. Emissions of other criteria pollutants would be below the standards. Finding No. 10 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment to the extent feasible. Pitcts in Support of Finding No. I0 The potential impacts pertaining to the dust during construction have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: Dust generated by the development activities shall be retained on site and kept to a minimum by following the dust control measures listed below. During clearing, grading, earth moving, excavation, or transportation of cut or fill materials, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to prevent dust from leaving the site and to create a crust after each day's activities cease. During construction, water trucks or sprinkler systems shall be used to keep all areas of vehicle movement damp enough to prevent dust from leaving the site. At a minimum, this would include wetting down such areas in the later morning and after work is completed for the day, and whenever wind exceeds 15 miles per hour. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation is completed, the entire area of disturbed soil shall be treated immediately by pickup of the soil until the area is paved or otherwise developed so that dust generation will not occur. Soil stockpiled for more than two days shall be covered, kept moist, or treated with soil binders to prevent dust generation. Trucks transporting soil, sand, cut or fill materials and/or construction debris to or from the site shall be tarped from the point of origin. Significant Effect No. 11 Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions associated with architectural coatings are not calculated because there is no sufficient information available for emissions produced by the painting of residential and commercial facilities. VOCs produced during construction may be a potentially significant impact. 5/13/99(R:\CRG831XFinal Recirc EIR~indingskFINDINGS.WPD) 26 LSA Associates, Inc. Finding No. 11 Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment to the extent feasible. Facts in Support of Finding No. 1 l ~Pae potential impacts pertaining to the emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) during construction have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than- significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measure is as follows: The Construction Contractor shall utilize as much as possible precoated/natural colored building materials, water-based or 1ow-VOC coat- ing, and coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency, such as high volume low pressure (HVLP) spray method, or manual coatings application such as paint brush, hand roller, trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge. Significant Effect No. 12 Vehicular trips associated with the proposed project would produce emissions that would exceed the SCAQMD daily thresholds for the criteria pollutant of CO, ROC, and NOx. Findings No. 12 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment to the extent feasible; however, impacts of the operation of the proposed project remain significant and tinavoidable after mitigation. In accordance with the requirements of CEQA, the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations and made findings regard- ing the benefits of the proposed project. Facts' in Support of Finding No. 12 The potential impacts pertaining to the emissions of CO, ROC, and NOx have been reduced to the extent feasible; however, even after implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR, the impact is considered significant and unavoidable. Further mitigation is technically and economically infeasible since, to some extent, any major development project in the region will incrementally increase emissions. Therefore the project's impact on air quality during daily operations would remain significant and the City must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations. The mitigation measures are as follows: The project shall comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations established by the Energy Commission regarding energy conservation stan- dards. The project applicant shall incorporate the following in building plans: 5/113/99(R:\CRG831Winal Recirc EIRWindings\FINDINGS.WPD) 27 LSA Associates, Inc. Planting trees to provide shade and shadow to building; Solar or low-emission water heaters shall be used with combined space/water heater unit; Refrigerator with vacuum power insulation; Double-pained glass or window treatment for energy conservation shall be used in all exterior windows; and Energy-efficient low-sodium parking lot lights shall be used. Use of transportation demand measures (TDM) such as preferential parking for vanpooling/carpooling, subsidy for transit pass or vanpooling/carpooling, flextime work schedule, bike racks, lockers, showers, and onsite cafeteria shall be incorporated in the design of the commercial land uses. The project proponent shall determine with the City and the electrical pur- veyor if it is feasible to pre-wire houses for electrical charges for EV cars and/or optic fibers for home offices. If feasible, install EV charges and/or optic-fibers per the electrical purveyor's direction prior to Certificate of Occu- pancy. Install EV charges or electrical fuel stations/natural gas for community wide use at key commercial and public location(s) such as park and ride lots, Metrolink Station, and commercial centers. The developer shall contract with a mitigation monitor to assure compliance and implementation with the mitigation monitoring program. The developer shall install bicycle trails per the City's General Bikeways Plan. No~e Significant Effect No. 13 Noise levels from grading and other construction activities for the proposed project may range up to 85 dBA at the closest residences to the northeast of the project site north of Base Line Road or to the east of Etiwanda Avenue for very limited times when construction occurs near them. Construction-related noise impacts would be potentially significant. Finding No. 13 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. 5/13/99(R:\CRG831 \Final Recirc EIR~indings\FINDINGS.WPD) 28 LSA Associates, Inc. Pacts in Support of Finding No. 13 2]ae potential impacts pertaining to noise levels from grading and other construction activities on nearby residences have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than- significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: During all project site excavation and grading on-site, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operat- ing and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers standards. The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors to the east of the site. The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors to the east of the site during all project construction. During all project site construction, the construction contractor shall limit all construction-related activities that would result in high noise levels to be- tween the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, unless such construction activities do not result in noise levels exceeding 45 dBA at residences to the east of the site. No construction shall be allowed on Sundays and public holidays. Significant Effect No. 14 Increases in noise levels could result from project-related traffic on access roads leading to the project site. Project-related long-term vehicular trip increases would be 45,487 daily. The incremental traffic noise level increases would be less than 2 dBA, e:~cept along Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boule- vard, where the increase would be 4.7 dBA but no sensitive uses exist currently. No significant traffic noise impacts on off-site sensitive uses are anticipated. However, proposed on-site residential uses would potentially be exposed to traffic noise levels exceeding the 60 dBA Ldn standard recommended for residential uses. Finding No. 14 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. ·'acts in Support of Finding No. 14 The potential impacts pertaining to exposing on-site residential uses to noise levels exceeding standards along area roadways have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: 5/13/99(R:\CRG831Lginal Recirc EIR~indings~FINDINGS.WPD) 29 LSA Associates, Inc. Noise studies shall be required to be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to final map approval for residential units proposed within the following areas: Within 249 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between future Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Park Lane; Within 378 feet of the centerline of Base Line Road between Victoria Park Lane and Etiwanda Avenue; Within 66 feet of the centerline of Church Street between Rochester Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard; Within 194 feet of the centerline of Church Street between future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue; Within 211 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard be- tween Base Line Road and Church Street; and Within 269 feet of the centerline of future Day Creek Boulevard be- tween Church Street and Foothill Boulevard. Mitigation such as setback, concrete block wall, or earthen berm or their combination along the property line, proper building orientation, building facade upgrade, double-paned windows, and/or mechanical ventilation shall be provided. Public Services Schools Significant Effect No. 15 As a result of the overcrowding in the classrooms of the Etiwanda and Chaffey School Districts, both districts have urged and continue to urge the City not to approve devel- opment applications unless adequate school facilities are available to serve the devel- o'pment project. Future development will generate more students for the already impacted school districts and is considered significant. School mitigation plans would be enacted between the Etiwanda School District/Chaffey Joint Union High School District and the project developer providing for a per dwelling unit fee rate for the residential portion of the project site. Finding No. 15 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 15 The proposed project's impact on schools has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: 5/[ 3/99(R:\CRG831 ~inal Recirc E1R\Findings~FINDINGS.WPD) 30 LSA Associates, Inc. The developer shall be required to execute an agreement with Etiwanda School District and Chaffey Unified High School District to provide adequate mitigation. Such an agreement shall be executed prior to Planning Commis- sion approval for any residential project within the General Plan Amendment area. Actual implementation of the agreement by the payment of fees, dedica- tion of sites or other mitigation will take place as building permits are ob- tained. In the event that the developer declines to execute a mitigation agreement, the City shall require full mitigation as a condition of approval. Full mitigation shall be accomplished by means of a requirement to form a Mello-Roos Com- munity Facilities district for school facilities. In order to reduce the burden on the future homeowners, it is possible to structure the community facilities district such that some of the special taxes would be prepaid by the developer. Parks and Recreation Significant Effect No. 16 ~he residential portion of the proposed project would increase the demand for active recreation facilities within the Victoria Community and Etiwanda Specific Plan areas. For the Victoria Community Plan area, the proposed project must provide 22.41 acres ofparkland, and for the Eftwanda Specific Plan, an additional 2.35 acres for a total of 20.68 acres ofparkland is required for the proposed project. Currently, the proposed project has only provided for a total of 8.62 acres of active recreational facilities causing a deficiency of 20.68 acres of active recreation which is a significant impact to park facilities. Finding No. 16 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. l~acts in Support of Finding No. 1'6 The proposed project's impact on parks has been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: The developer shall be subject to Ordinance No. 105 set by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to establish regulations for dedication of land, payment of fees, or both, for park and recreational land in subdivisions and planned communities. The developer is responsible for 24.76 acres of parkland either by fee or by dedication. At the time of filing a tentative tract map or a minor subdivision plat for approval, the City Park and Recreation Commission shall determine whether dedication of property for 24.76 acres of park and recreational purposes or in lieu of fees are necessary~ If the City desires dedication, the area shall be designated on the tentative tract map when submitted and a General Plan 5/~ 3/99(R:\CRG831L~inal Recirc EIR~indings~FINDINGS.WPD) 31 LSA Associates, Inc. amendment indicating the location of any park shall be processed subject to Park and Recreation Commission review and recommendation. Where dedication is offered and accepted, it shall be accomplished in accor- dance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Where fees are re- quired, the same shall be deposited with the City prior to the issuance of building permits. Significant Effect No. 17 ~l~e residential and commercial areas proposed would increase the demand for active recreational facilities causing a significant impact to trail use in the City. Finding No. 17 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Pacts in Support of Finding No. 17 ~lhe potential impacts of the proposed project on trails have been eliminated or re- duced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. To mitigate the potential impacts to trails and to also implement the City's Master Plan of Trails, future devel- opment proposals must provide additional acreage for trails to meet the need within the City. ~llae mitigation measures are as follows: The parkway on the east side of "future" Day Creek Boulevard shall be wid- ened by 20 to 25 feet to provide a multi-use trail from Base Line Road south to terminate at the City's adult sports complex. Specific design of the trail shall be determined by the City at the time development plans are submitted for review and approval for any development proposals adjacent to "future" Day Creek Boulevard. The specific design shall tie in with the City's Day Creek Boulevard Master Plan design. The trail shall be designed to connect to planned and existing trail systems in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and shall connect the residential areas north and south of Base Line to the regional commercial areas adjacent: to Interstate 15. The developer shall follow and implement the design concepts set out for Victoria Parkway, and community trail system within the Victoria Commu- nity Plan. The developer shall provide a system of trails within the proposed project's linear park system connecting existing trails to the regional center within the Victoria Community Plan area. 5/13/99(R:\CRG83 ! ~Final Recirc EIRL~indings~]NDINGS.WPD) 32 /7/ LSA Associates, Inc. Police Significant Effect No. 18 ll~e proposed project will result in a potentially significant impact as an increase in demand for police services. An additional five police personnel would be required for the proposed residential and commercial development. Finding No. 18 Changes of alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 18 The potential impacts of the proposed project on police have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measure is as follows: As stated in the General Requirements and Approvals for the Police Depart- ment for the City, a signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be filed with City Engineering prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first for' any projects within the project area between Base Line Road and I- 15. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Fire Significant Effect No. 19 Impacts of the proposed project on fire service for the City of Rancho Cucamonga are potentially significant. Based on the standard response time threshold of five minutes, and the project's location relative to Stations 3, 4, and 5, the site is anticipated to fall within the five-minute response time criteria. l~nding No. 19 Changes or alterations have been :required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 19 The potential impacts of the proposed project on fire services have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: 5/Ii 3/99(R:\CRG83 l~inal Recirc EIR~indings~INDINGS.WPD) 33 LSA Associates, Inc. The developer shall join the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District to provide fire protection services to the site. The developer shall install automated fire sprinkler systems in commercial, industrial, and multi-family residential units in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 15 and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance No. 22. Aesthetics Significant Effect No. 20 qi'l~e proposed project would replace 19 acres of lakes and open space, for increased residential and commercial uses, causing a substantial loss of planned open space. This would significantly alter existing and future public views and view corridors. l~¥nding No. 20 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. l~tcts in Support of Finding No. 20 ~he potential visual impacts of the proposed project have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: New buildings within 100 feet of future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue shall be restricted to 35 feet in height to protect the view corridor of the mountains for motorists traveling north. The City Planning Department shall ensure that this condition is applied prior to approval of the proposed General Plan amendments.. ,, Noise walls along future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street shall be no more than 8 feet tall to avoid a sense of "visual enclosure" for these Scenic Corridors, and should be set back an adequate distance to allow landscaping on the road side of the sound wall. This re- quirement shall be attached as a condition of approval by the City Planning Department prior to approval of any development bordering future Day Creek Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, and Church Street. The City Planning Department shall amend the Community Design Criteria Part II of the Victoria Community Plan for its "recommended edge condi- tions" for future Day Creek Boulevard to show a similar landscape and set- back treatment on both the east and west sides of Day Creek Boulevard. This proposed landscaping shall be enhanced by short and tall drought-tolerant shrubs adjacent to sound walls to reduce the visual impacts of such walls. 5/13/99(R:\CRG831Lginal Recirc EIR~indingsXFINDINGS.WPD) 34 LSA Associates, Inc. Landscape requirements shall be established for the far southern end of the project site to screen new development from the view of motorists along 1-15 looking north. However, this landscaping should also allow views north towards the mountains, using the view corridor provided by the future Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The City Planning Department shall address such landscaping as a condition of approval for any development in the area of I- 15. Significant Effect No. 21 New light and glare would be created by the addition of residences and commercial establishments in an area previously proposed as a utility corridor. The most signifi- cant glare would be generated by commercial uses at the southern end of the project site, especially in association with outdoor parking that may be lit at night and that would be visible from roadways such as the future Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard, as well as minor roads to the east of the project site such as Victoria Loop, Church Street, and Day Creek Boulevard East. Finding No. 21 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. l~cts in Support of Finding No. 21 'I'lae potential visual impacts of the proposed project by the introduction of additional light and glare into the project area have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less- than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measure is as follows: The Design Review process for commercial establishments and public places shall ensure that no significant light or glare impacts shall result from the proposed project. Specific issues to be evaluated at the time of design review shall include the following: proposed exterior lighting and landscaping of parking areas to reduce visible lighting from outside these areas; use of shielding on exterior lights to focus light onto the ground; and, proposed architectural materials to ensure that reflective matedhals are minimized. ,, The developer shall account for the loss of the aesthetic benefit of the lakes by providing a new focal point concept within residential area to be submitted for Design Review. The focal point concept could include an open space trail system linkage to the winery site and commercial areas to the south by an open space corridor, and incorporate such features as a fountains, large ga- zebo, public art, public furniture, and/or increased open space/trails systems. 5/I 3/99(R:\CRG83 l~Final Recirc EIRL~indings~FINDINGS.WPD) 35 LSA Associates, Inc. Significant Effect No. 22 The project could conflict with policies of the City's General Plan Community Design Element and recommendations found in the Victoria Community Plan. PYnding No. 22 C. hanges or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Pitcts in Support of Finding No. 22 ~Ihe potential conflict of the proposed project with the policies of the City's General Plan Community Design Element and landscape recommendations found in the Victo- ria Community Plan have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measures are as follows: Provisions shall be made to account for protection of viewsheds and plant palette plans shown in the Victoria Community Plan for major intersections along future Day Creek Boulevard, Victoria Park Lane, and Church Street. Such provisions may include the following: building setbacks within the project site; varied allowable heights with lower heights nearest the inter- changes; clustering of buildings; and, landscaping to complement the viewshed. These issues shall be addressed by the City Planning Department as recommendations for the Design Review process at the time of developing conditions of approval for any projects within the proposed project corridor. To reduce potential conflicts with policies of the City's Community Design Element, recommended mitigation measures found under 4.6.1 shall also be implemented. The Community Design Criteria Part II of the Victoria Community Plan shall be amended immediately following project approval to address new uses proposed as part of the project. However, as part of this amendment, some requirements shall be included to reduce visual impacts of new development by inclusion of landscaping near major roads that matches those proposed by the Plan. For example, trees shall be planted along the site's property lines and along roadways to screen new development from view. Within the site and adjacent to major east-west corridors, the City shall designate areas for landscaping, ensuring that land adjacent to the roads is planted with low- growing vegetation to maintain a degree of visual open space on the project site. Biological Resources Significant Effect No. 23 The proposed project would substantially diminish habitat for wildlife or plants; this impact is considered to be significant. 5/13/99(R:\CRG831Winal Recirc EIRLFindings~FINDINGS.WPD) 36 175 LSA Associates, Inc. Finding No. 23 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. Facts in Support of Finding No. 23 The potential impacts pertaining to diminishing habitat for wildlife or plants have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measure is as follows: Minimize the amount of coastal sage scrub lost as the result of development (i.e., preserve the majority of the habitat on site) through project and construc- tion redesign, and purchase off-site lands to compensate for those areas of coastal sage scrub impacted. Restore (to ensure no-net-loss of acreage and quality) coastal sage scrub in annual grassland and/or abandoned vineyards to compensate for the loss of these habitats from elsewhere on site. Participate in off-site mitigation bank (i.e., Team Arundo) to provide compen- sation for the loss of 0.4 acre of mixed willow series. Purchase and preserve (in perpetuity) off-site lands to provide substitute resources for the coastal sage scrub that would be lost through project con- struetion. Suitable lands would support coastal sage scrub and would be in a location that would facilitate management of this habitat type, such as adjoin- ing the North Etiwanda Preserve. Given the disturbed condition of habitat on the project site, a less than 1:1 replacement ratio. Significant Effect No. 24 ~lae proposed project proposes to retain 0.97 acre of wetland on site. The retention may have a significant impact on the City's ability to improve or divert flows in the drainage system north of the proposed project area. Finding No. 24 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. 1%tcts in Support of Finding No. 24 The potential impacts have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-signifi- cant through implementation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. The mitigation measure is as follows: 5tI3/99(R:\CRG831~Final Recite EIRXa~indings~FINDINGS.WPD) 37 LSA Associates. Inc. If the City desires to eliminate the retention of the wetland on site, an individ- ual 404 permit shall be obtained from the Corps by the applicant. Mitigation required by the Corps may include creation or enhancement of off-site wet- land habitat at a ratio of at least 1:1 and as high as 3:1 (i.e., 3 acres created for each acre impacted). Provisions of the permit shall be adhered to prior to the issuance of grading permits for the area which contains the wetland. Cultural Resources Significant Effect No. 25 The potential for historic human burials and/or cultural materials may be present in the project area Finding No. 25 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the project which mitigate or avoid the significant effects on the environment. ~tcts in Support of Finding No. 25 'Ilae potential impacts pertaining to disturbance of human remains during construction have been eliminated or reduced to a level of less-than-significant through implemen- tation of the mitigation measures and project design described within the Final EIR. l]~e mitigation measure is as follows: In the event a cultural resource is uncovered during the course of the project, ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the find should be redirected until the nature and extent of the find can be evaluated by a qualified archae- ologist. If human remains are encountered, the San Bernardino County Coroner must be notified within 24 hours. If the coroner determines that the burial is not historic, but prehistoric, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted to determine the most likely descendent (MLD) for this area. The MLD may become involved with the disposition of the burial. 5/13/99(R:\CRG831\Final Recirc EIRLFindingsWINDINGS.WPD) 38 /'77 MATTHEW O. April 26, 1999 Nancy Fong, AICP Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucmnonga, CA 91730 RE: Arbors RECEIVED 6 1999 City ot RanChO Cucam°n9~ pmnning DNis~n Dear Nancy: Since the first informational meeting, you have done an excellent job keeping us informed of tneetings and summarizing the course which this development is following. Thank you very much. When the developer purchased this property, it knew that it was integrated wi(h the rest of Victoria and, more particularly, with the "regional shopping center". The developer had actual or constructive notice of the relationship between the land it now proposes to develop and the shopping center and the rest of Victoria. These factors were taken into consideration in the price which was paid for tiffs property. While it is only a guess on my part, I suspect that the developer paid a lesser price because of certain requirements which came with the land and were public knowledge. Now it is proposed that the developer be relieved of some of these obligations. While it may now make sense to change the reqt, irements, it does not make sense to give the developer a gift in the process. Whatever the developer receives in the way of concessions should be offset in the way on increased requirements in other areas. I am thinking primarily of the lakes and recreational facilities, but there is no reason the principle cannot be applied in other areas. EXHIBIT "C" Nancy Fong, AICP City of Rancho Cucamonga April 26, 1999 Page Two Jack Lam cm~ tell you that Etiwanda fought the density of Victoria very hard. But the City wanted Victoria very badly because the density of Victoria was cleverly advanced as the qt, id pro quo for the shopping center. The City, in order to obtain the shopping center, allowed much higher densities in Victoria than otherwise would have been allowed. The pt, blic paid a price for this, particularly in the area of school impact, traffic and crime (especially in the south part of Victoria). The reqt, ests of Arbor's developers are indirectly asking tile City to forget the sacrifices file rest of the City made for Victoria. I am calling this to your attention again becat, se I wm~t to be certain that the City does not forget these sacrifices. The other residents of the City, particularly those in the Etiwanda area, have a major investment in seeing that the entire Arbors area is particularly nice. I certainly don't want to see the City give up lightly and let this investment be given to tile developer in the form of concessions. The City owes it to the residents not to minimize their sacrifice. The developer owes it to the City to produce something which turns out extremely nice and ameliorates the previous impacts on schools, traffic and crime. I am also troubled by tile developer breaking the project up into smaller seciions. Tile Victoria Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan both included thousands of hours of effort. Nobody should be allowed to defeat any part of these plans by making changes in comparatively s,nall areas when the cumulative impact of these changes on the whole of the plan slips ttu'ough unnoticed or unappreciated. In my view, too much attention is being paid to the impact of the Arbors internally and not enough attention is being devoted to the impact of piecemeal development to the rest of Victoria and Etiwanda. Please don't let it be broken into small blocks. Please consider the entire planning area. JBJ/gp Sincerely, ~'/' ' ( Is ' ~la,nes Ban I?q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 98-02, VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 98-01 AS HAVING BEEN COMPLETED IN COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) A. Recitals. 1. A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) consisting of that document entitled "Final Environmental Impact Report for General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01" has been presented to this Council for the Councit's consideration of the General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01. 2. The public comment period for the EIR was duly and lawfully closed on May 17, 1999, following due notices to the public and all applicable public agencies. 3. On May 26, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the certification of the EIR. 4. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the certification of the EIR. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on July 7, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and the consideration of the contents of the Final EIR, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The Final EIR prepared for General Plan Amendment 98-02, Victoria Community Plan Amendment 98-01, and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 98-01 has been completed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resource Code Sections 21000 et seq. ("CEQA") with the State and City Guidelines for implementing CEQA, and all other applicable laws and regulations and, b. The Final EIR was presented to the City Council and that the Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR prior to the Council consideration of the proposed project 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Viczoria/- r3ors Vi ace Copyright, 1999 © City of Rancho Cucamonga. MAP LEG~'Np Figure 3.2 ProJect Site Localion · Existinq conditions )ro.:ecz Victoria Community plan (vcp) - 64.3 acres of multifamily to single family - 58.76 acres of commercial to single family & multifamily - 18.74 acres of open space & lakes to residential 13.28 acres of multifamily to school-park LM 3 Proposed and Existing Land Uses VCP Cont'd - 2.9 acres of commercial to single family - 8.44 acres of low medium to low residential Etiwanda Specific Plan LM - 26 acres of office to single family N Proposed and Existing Land Figure 3.3 i Figwe Proposed Proj~.x:t Land IJ:~ Designations i N~P, LSA .. Figure 3.6 Conceptual Plan 6 :u r 3ose o-':_ Inform the public of any significant impacts to the physical environment resulting from the the project Identify ways to avoid or lessen. impacts Identify alternatives to the project Promote public education & awareness of project E- )rocess Notice of Preparation Public Scoping Meeting- May 12, 1998 Draft EIR -Circulated Dec. 18, 1998- Feb 9, 1999 - Re-circulated Apr 1, 1999 - May 17,1999 i Final EIR rocess 'Cont'c' Recirculated Draft EIR - Why? · Draft EIR revised to address - Land use compatibility with Filippi Winery and Nichiren Shoshu Buddist Temple with new mitigation - New Alternative which included a Special District Overlay in the area of the historic winery - Biological section revised to analyze impacts of retaining 0.97 acre of wetland Ohsire rocess 'Con:'c' Final EIR - Contains ,. Draft EIR and RecirculaLed Draft EIR as one document · Responses Lo Commen~s on Draft: and Recirculated Dra~ EIRs · MiLigation MoniLoring Plan · Facts and Findings Summary o-' -m :::)ac: Land Use Traffic and Circulation Air Qualib' Noise Public Services - Schools, Fire, Police - Recreation and Parks Visual/Aesthetic Resources Biological Resources Cultural Resources Summary of impact and Mitigation Land Use ]:mpact 1 · ]:ncompatible with surrounding commercial !and uses - future regional mall - Filippi Winery, Nichiren $hoshu Temple Mitigation 1 · Use noise and aesthetics mitigation measures - 8 foot block walls; earthen berms. - 25 foot landscaping buffer for the neighboring areas. - 60 foot setbacks for dwellings II Summary of ]:mpacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Land Use (Cont'd) - ]:mpact 2 ,, Conflict with land use, open space, and design concept of Victoria Lakes Village Mitigation 2 ,, Use public services and aesthetics mitigation measures - provide 20.68 acres of park/open space by dedicating parkland and/or paying in-lieu-of fees. - ]:ncrease landscaping and dwelling setbacks to buffer the neighboring areas /2- Summary of ]:mpacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Land Use (Cont'd) impact 3 · Create a ~'sandwich" effect of placing residential zones between commercial zones west of Day Creek Boulevard · Create a "island" of office zone within the Etiwanda Specific Plan west of Etiwanda Avenue Mitigation 3 · Use the same noise, public services, and aesthetics as outlined under ]:mpacts ::[ & 2 - Block wall, increase landscape buffer and dwelling setbacks Summary of Impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Traffic :Impact · 15 intersections will be impacted in the project area · The project will contribute to deficiencies along 6 freeway segments. Mitigation · Developer pays its fair share per City's Traffic Fee Program to upgrade roadways. Summary of impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Air Quality Short Term ]:mpact · Nitrogen Oxide and particulates exceeds SCAQiViD thresholds during construction Mitigation · Construction traffic to not interfere with peak hour traffic · Encourage rideshare programs and transit incentives · Use electric powered construction equipment · Shut off equipment when not in use · No grading during high wind periods · Keep the bare ground wet during grading to reduce dust · Stock piled dirt must be covered and kept moist · Trucks transporting soil must be covered Summary of Impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Air Quality (Cont'd) - Long Term ]:mpact · ]:ncreased vehicle emissions Mitigation · Comply with Title 24 regarding energy conservation · Use low VOC coatings, precoated/natural colored building materials · Pre-wire houses for electrical charges for EV cars · ]:nstall EV charges or alternative fuel stations at commercial sites · ]:nstall bike trails · Developer to hire mitigation monitor to assure compliance with the mitigation monitoring program - Long term impacts remain significant even after mitigation, an unavoidable adverse impact of the proposed project Summary of :[mpacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Noise Short Term Impact · Noise during construction will be high Mitigation · Maintain construction equipment with proper mufflers · Direct noise from stationary equipment and equipment staging areas away from existing houses · Construction to be limited between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. Mon- Sat Summary of Impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Noise (Cont'd) Long Term Impact · Increased traffic will increase noise levels along Church St. between Rochester and Day Creek Boulevard Mitigation · Detailed noise studies prior to final map approval in designated areas · Mitigation may include increased setbacks, concrete block walls earthen berm or a combination at property lines, building orientation, double-paned windows, building facade upgrades Summary of Impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Public Service Schools Impact · Increase in housing will generate additional students Mitigation · School mitigation plans will be enacted between the developer and the Etiwanda and Chaffey .Joint Union School Districts · Developer proposes a l O-acre school site to relieve the burden on Etiwanda School District Summary of :Impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) PUBLIC SERVICES Park and Recreation Impact 1 · Increase demand for parkland · Project needs to provide 20.68 acres of parkland · Project provides 13.8 acres with a deficiency of 6.98 acres Mitigation 1 · Provide 20.68 acres of parkland and/or in-lieu-of fees. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Public Services Parks & Recreation (Cont'd) impact 2 · increase demand for active recreational facilities Mitigation 2 · Provide additional acreage for trails to meet City needs · Construct 25-foot parkway on east side of Day Creek Blvd. with a multi-use trail. · Construct a park for active use Summary of Impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Public Services Fire and Police impact - Future development will increase demands on fire and police protection Mitigation 1 · The developer to form or join the Law Enforcement and the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts to pay for and provide police and fire services to the project area Summary of Impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Aesthetics/Visual Impact 1 [] Project will replace 19 acres of proposed lakes and open space, resulting in loss of planned open space and alteration of existing and future public views and view corridors Mitigation 1 [] Provide a new focal point, a trail system linking residential and commercial areas, and open space corridors with features like public art, fountains, etc. [] Avoid a sense of"visual enclosure" by limiting new buildings to 35-ft in height, noise walls to 8-ft in height [] Increased landscaping and screening Summary of impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Aesthetics/Visual (Cont'd) ]:mpact 2 · New light and glare will be created by the proposed project Mitigation 2 · City's Design Review process will ensure future development does not produce excessive light and glare Summary O: :m ::)ac:s anc IVlitic a:ion 'Con:'c' Biological Resources ]:mpact 1 · Diminish coastatsage scrub (poor quality) · Diminish mixed willow habitat onsite Mitigation 1 · Mitigation not warranted for loss of poor quality coastal sage scrub · Developer will participate in an off-site mitgation bank to provide compensation for loss of 0.4 acres of mixed willow. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Biological Resources (Cont'd) Impact 2 [] Retention of 0.97 acres of wetland onsite may impact the City's ability to maintain the wetland and improve or divert drainage flows to the north [] Retention of the wetland may increase vectors Mitigation 2 [] If the City chooses to eliminate the wetland, an individual 404 permit must be obtained by from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Summary of impacts and Mitigation (Cont'd) Cultural Resources Impact · Developer may encounter buried historic human and/or cultural materials during construction Mitigation · In the event a cultural resource is uncovered, halt and/or redirect ground disturbing activities · Retain a qualified archaeologist to evaluate the find · if human remains are found, notify San Bernardino County Coroner; and if the remains are considered prehistoric, notify Native American Heritage Commission A :erna:ives No Project/No Development Existing Victoria Community Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Low Medium Density Residential ~~. ~'/~ School/Park (~~. [. ~_) Tncreased Regional Retail/Special Use zone Jl Figure 6.1 Low Medium Residemid Ahemative N LSA ~ I I Figure 6.2 School/Park Alternative I I I I I ~- I1~ Me~um R~siOu.~l~l Figure 6.3 Increased Regional Retail/ Special Use Zone Alternative A :erna:ives En vi ronmental A~alysis Subject band Use Traffic Air Quality No ise Public Ser- vices Biological Resou roes Cultural Resources Aesthetics Notes: Existing No Victoda and Low- SchooV Project Etiwanda Medium Park Proposed AJterna- Community Plan Residential Alterna- Project tive AJter native A!tern ative ti ve : Less than significant impact after mitigation. Increased Regional Re- tail/Special Use Zone Alternative [] = Greater than significant impact after mitigation. [] = As compared to the proposed project the impact is the same. CITY OF iRANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: July 7, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Debra Meier, Contract Planner Dan Coleman, Principal Planner DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, consolidating the Industrial Area Specific Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement, Caryn Planned Community Development Plan, and Residential Commercial/Industrial Design Guidelines into appropriate sections of the Development Code. Related files: Industrial Areas Specific Plan Amendment 99-03, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, and Caryn Planned Community Amendment 99-01. INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to consolidate the Industrial Area Specific Plan regulatory provisions and design guidelines into the Development Code. Related files: Development Code Amendment 99-02, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, and Caryn Planned Community Amendment 99-01. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA- An amendment to consolidate the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan regulatory provisions and design guidelines into the Development Code. Related files: Development Code Amendment 99-02, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, and Caryn Planned Community Amendment 99-01. CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 99-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to consolidate the Caryn Planned Community Development Plan regulatory provisions into the Development Code. Related files: Development Code Amendment 99-02, Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 99-01. RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission recommends approval. BACKGROUND As a result of the numerous Specific Plans and Planned Communities that have been approved within the City since incorporation, implementation and use of such an array of documents has become cumbersome for staff, the general public, and the development community to determine standards, regulations, and guidelines for various segments of the City. The goal of the Code Consolidation effort is to consolidate these development regulations into a single document for ease of use. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CODE CONSOLIDATION - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 7, 1999 Page 2 This effort included consolidation of the following documents and Planning Commission Policies into the Development Code: Industrial Area Specific Plan Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement Caryn Planned Community Commercial/Industrial Design Guidelines Residential Design Guidelines ANALYSIS Consolidation of the Development Code resulted in amending portions of the following chapters: 17.02 The addition of definitions pertaining to Recyclables (R) and Waste Types (W). 17.08 Revisions to the Residential Districts Chapter pertaining to Caryn Planned Community (Table 17.08.040-B Note M) and the Design Guidelines (throughout 17.08.090). 17.10 Revisions to the Commercial/Office Districts pertaining to the addition of Design Guidelines (throughout 17.10.060). 17.12 Revisions to the Parking Regulations, adding parking regulations for the Industrial Districts (17.12.030.D and 17.12.040.C). 17.14 Revisions to the Specific Plans and Planned Communities Districts chapter reflecting the change in status of the Caryn Planned Community, the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (17.14.030 and 17.14.040). In addition, two new chapters are being added to the Development Code: 17.30 Industrial Districts. The Industrial Area Specific Plan has been wholly incorporated as Chapter I7.30 of the Development Code, the subarea concept has been maintained and is included as 17.30.080 Subarea Development Standards. 17.32 Foothill Boulevard Districts. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan has been wholly incorporated as Chapter 17.32, again the subarea concept has been maintained and is included as 17.32.080 Subarea Development Standards. BB:DC:mlg Attachments: Amended Portions of Consolidated Development Code (transmitted separately) Ordinance Amending Development Code Ordinance Amending Industrial Area Specific Plan Resolution Amending Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Ordinance Amending Caryn Planned Community Development Plan ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~// AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 99-02, AMENDING CHAPTERS 17.02, 17.08, 17.10, 17.12, 17.14 AND ADDING CHAPTERS 17.30 AND 17.32 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING CONSOLIDATION OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN; THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN; THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DESIGN SUPPLEMENT; CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN; AND THE RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES INTO A UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. A. Recitals. 1. On June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 99-57, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Development Code. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2:: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: The following sections hereby are amended to read, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A," and summarized below: Section 17.02.140 - The addition of definitions pertaining to Recyclables (R) and Waste Types (W). Section 17.08.040 - Revisions to the residential Districts Chapter pertaining to Caryn Planned Community (Table 17.08.040-B Note M). Section 17.08.090 - Revisions to the Residential Districts Chapter to include Design Guidelines. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DCA 99-02 o CITY OF R.C. July 7, 1999 Page 2 Section 17.10.060 - Revisions to the Commercial/Office Districts pertaining to the addition of Design Guidelines. Sections 17.12.030 and 17.12.040 - Revisions to the Parking Regulations, adding parking regulations for the Industrial Districts (17.12.030.D and 17.12.040.C). Sections 17.14.030 and 17.14.040 - Revisions to the Specific Plans and Planned Communities Districts Chapter reflecting the change in status of the Caryn Planned Community, the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. In addition, two new Chapters are being added to the Development Code: Chapter 17.30- Industrial Districts. The Industrial Area Specific Plan has been wholly incorporated as Chapter 17.30 of the Development Code, the subarea concept has been maintained and is included as 17.030.080 Subarea Development Standards. Chapter 17.32 -Foothill Boulevard Districts. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan has been wholly incorporated as Chapter 17.32, again the subarea concept has been maintained and is included as 17.32.080 Subarea Development Standards SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or work thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontado, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~)"~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03, TO CONSOLIDATE PORTIONS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND REPEALING ALL OTHER SECTIONS OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN. A. Recitals. 1. On June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 99-58, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public headng concerning the subject amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 3. All legal prerequisites pdor to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. O~inance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: The Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 99-03 is hereby amended by incorporating selected portions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan into the Development Code, as summarized below, and as shown in the attached Exhibit "A," and repealing all other sections of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. The Industrial Area Specific Plan is incorporated into the following sections of the Development Code: Section 17.02.140 - Administration Definitions Sections 17.12.030 and 17.12.040 - Parking Regulations Section 17.14.030 - Specific Plans and Planned Communities District Section 17..30- Industrial Districts CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. IasPa 99-03 - CITY OF R.C. July 7, 1999 Page 2 SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or work thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. RESOLUTION NO. AN RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, TO CONSOLIDATE PORTIONS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND REPEALING ALL OTHER SECTIONS OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN. A. Recitals. 1. On June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly-noticed public headng with respect to the above-referenced Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 99-57, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Resolution. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as. amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 3: The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 99-01 is hereby amended by incorporating selected portions of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan into the Development Code, as summarized below, and as shown in the attached Exhibit "A," and repealing all other sections of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan is incorporated into the following sections of the Development Code: Section 17..14.030 - Specific Plans and Planned Communities Districts Chapter 17.32 - Foothill Boulevard Districts SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Resolution is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Resolution. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. FBSP 99-01 - CITY OF R.C. July 7, 1999 Page 2 subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or work thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after :its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ORDINANCE NO. ~D~ AN ORDINANCE Of THE CiTY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, TO CONSOLIDATE PORTIONS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND REPEALING ALL OTHER SECTIONS OF THE CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN. A. Recitals. 1. On June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duty-noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Caryn Planned Community Development Plan Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 99-60, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded a duly-noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Caryn Planned Community Development Plan Amendment. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance,, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: This City Council hereby finds and determines that the subject amendment identified in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of Chapter 3 of Division 6 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, SECTION 3: The Caryn Planned Community Development Plan Amendment No. 99-03 is hereby amended by incorporating selected portions of the Caryn Planned Community Development Plan into the Development Code, as summarized below, and as shown in the attached Exhibit "A," and repealing all other sections of the Caryn Planned Community Development Plan. The Caryn Planned Community Development Plan is incorporated into the following sections of the Development Code: Section 17.08,140 - Residential Districts Section 17,, 14,040 - Specific Plans and Planned Communities Districts SECTION 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or legislation shall not CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. CPCDPA 99-01 - CITY OF R.C. July 7, 1999 Page 2 affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or work thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. AMENDED PORTIONS OF THE CONSOLIDATED DEVELOPMENT CODE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION July 7, 1999 17.02 The addition of definitions pertaining to Recyclables (R) and Waste Types (W). 17.08 Revisions to the Residential Districts Chapter pertaining to Caryn Planned Community (Table 17.08040-B Note M) and the Design Guidelines (throughout 17.08.090). 17.10 Revisions to the Commercial/Office Districts pertaining to the addition of Design Guidelines (throughout 17.10.060). 17.12 Revisions to the Parking Regulations, adding parking regulations for the Industrial Districts (17.12.030.D and 17.12.040.C). 17.14 Revisions to the Specific Plans and Planned Communities Districts chapter reflecting the change in status of the Caryn Planned Community, the Industrial Area Specific Plan, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (17.14.030 and 17.14.040). In addition, two new chapters are being added to the Development Code: 17.30 Industrial Districts. The Industrial Area Specific Plan has been wholly incorporated as Chapter 17.30 of the Development Code, the subarea concept has been maintained and is included as 17.30.080 Subarea Development Standards. 17.32 Foothill Boulevard Districts. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan has been wholly incorporated as Chapter 17.32, again the subarea concept has been maintained and is included as 17.32.080 Subarea Development Standards. CHAPTER 17.02 - ADMINISTRATION Section 17.02.010 - Purpose and Intent ................................ 17.02-1 Section 17.02.020 - Development Districts ............................. 17.02-2 Section 17.02.030 - Conflicts and Clarifications ......................... 17,02-4 Section 17.02.040 - Use Determination ............................... 17.02-4 Section 17.02.050 - City Planner .................................... 17,02-5 Section 17,02.060 - Amendments ................................... 17.02-5 Section 17~02.070 - Revisions/Modifications ........................... 17.02-7 Section 17.02.080 - Appeals ....................................... 17.02-8 Section 17,02.090 - Approval to Extend with the Land or Applicant .......... 17,02-8 Section 17,02.100 - Lapse of Approval and Extensions ................... 17.02-8 Section 17.02,110 - Public Hearings and Notification ..................... 17.02-9 Section 17.02.120 - Noise Abatement ................................ 17.02-I4 Section 17,02.130 - Non-Conforming Uses and Structures ............... 17.02-16 Section 17,02.135 - General Development: Standards ................... 17.02-17 Section 17.02.140 - Definitions ..................................... 17.02-18 Section 17.02.600 - Commercial Parties Prohibited in all Residential Zones and Property Used for Residential Purposes ........ 17.02-44 Rancho Ct~t.tort,ea Development Code Section 17.02.140 RECYCLABLES: Recyclabfes are discards or waste materials that are collated, separated, or processed and used as raw materials or products. Typically, recyclables would include domestic waste such as beverage containers and newspaper, cardboard, high-grade paper, plastics, textiles, light industrial wastes, or other similar materials. Recyctables are not intended to include chemicals, toxic water, heavy industrial waste, petroleum, construction waste, unsorted garbage, heavy metals, or other similar materials as determined by the City Planner. RECYCLING: The series of activities by which materials, that would otherwise be ?disposedof, arecollected, separated, orprocessedandusedintheformofrawmaterials. ¢ RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION: A seminary, retreat, monastery, conference center, or similar use for the conduct of religious activities, including accessory housing incid(~;~al ther ,~----'~ ",,,..~but exclud_,~a private e cattonal factlit REPAIR: The reconstruction or renewal of any part ol an existing building for the purpose of its maintenance. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: A use engaged in study, testing, design, analysis, and experimental development of products, processes, or services including incidental manufacturing of products or provision of services to others. RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY: Any family home, group care facility, or similar facility for' 24-hour non-medical care of persons in need of personal services, supervision, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual. RESTAURANT: A use providing preparation and retail sale of food and beverages, including cafes, coffee shops, sandwich shops, ice cream parlors, and similar uses and including licensed "on-sale" provision of wine and beer for consumption on the premises when accessory to such food service. RIGHT-OF-WAY: A strip of land acquired by reservation, dedication, forced dedication, prescription, or condemnation and intended to be occupied or occupied by a road. crosswalk, railroad, electric transmission lines, oil or gas pipeline, water line, sanitary slorm sewer, and other similar uses. ROOM, RECREATION: A single room in a main building or in an accessory building designed and/or used exclusively for recreational purposes by the occupants or guests of the premises. RUBBISH: The word "rubbish" includes but is not restricted to all non-reusable waste or debris such as paper, cardboard, grass, !ree or shrub trimmings, rugs, straw, clothing, wood or wood products, crockery, glass, rubber, metal, plastic, construction waste and debris, and other similar materials. RUN WITH THE LAND: A covenant restriction to the use of land contained in a deed and binding on the present and atl future owners of the property. S SCHOOL, BUSINESS OR TRADE: A use providing education or training in business, commerce, language, or other similar activity or occupational pursuit and not otherwise defined as a home occupation, college or university, or public or private educational facility. 17.02-37 6/99' Rancho Cucamon.~a Development Code Section 17.02.140 space, but excluding bulk storage o..Lmal"~ials which ar-" r ammable or expl-""~slve or whic-'~'~ create z/hff"'~"Fd'6~ ur co~f~cognized offensive conditions. ~'~W~STE. CONSTRUCTION:Constructionanddemolitiondebris, dredgings, grubbing from land clearing, and rubble and the remodeling, repair, and demolition operations on housing, commercial buildings, and other structures and pavements. WASTE, DOMESTIC: A class for discards that occur both in the home and work place; ~ i.e. beverage containers and newspapers. WASTE. HEAVY INDUSTRIAL: Waste derived from industrial and manufacturing operations such as ship building., construction, and demolition operations. ) WASTE, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL: Waste derived from research and development facilities andlightmanufacturingOperatiOnssuchassemicOnductOrsandcOmputermanufacturers' WHOL~A~LING: A us~aged pri~b"ity. jn the sellin~f,~y type of~ for purposef,-~.. of resale, in-'Cludh ,~ In(fidenta~iur~-~e and distribubon. Y YARD: An open space that lies between the principal or accessory building or buildings and the nearest lot line. YARD, CORNER SIDE: A side yard which faces a public street on a corner lot and extending from the front yard to the rear yard. YARD, FRONT: A yard extending the full width of the lot between the front lot line and a line parallel thereto and passing through the nearest point of the building; provided that, if a future street right-of-way has been established, such measurement shall be from the ¢uture street right-of-way line. 'YARD, REAR: A yard extending the full width of the lot between the rear lot line and a line parallel thereto. For through lots, if a future street right-of-way has been established, such measurement shall be from the future street right-of-way line. 17.02-43 6/99 CHAPTER 17.08- RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Section 17.08.010 - Purposes and General Plan Consistency .............. 17.08-1 Section 17.08.020 - Residential Development Districts ................... 17.08-1 Section 17,08.030 - Use Regulations ................................. 17,08-2 Section 17.08.040 - Site Development Criteria .......................... I7.08-9 Section 17.08,050 - Absolute Policies ............................... 17.08-26 Section 17.08.060 - Special Development Criteria ...................... 17.08-32 Section 17.08.070 - General Provisions .............................. 17.08-37 Section 17.08,080 - Performance Standards .......................... 17.08-42 Section 17.08.090 - General Design Guidelines ........................ 17.08-44 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.08.040 (H) A single family detached dwelling less than 1,000 square feet may be authorized when a development exhibits innovative qualities in tract, plot, and architectural design through the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Senior citizen projects are exempted from this requirement. To assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area or project, the following percentage limitations of the total number of units shall apply: tO percent for efficiency/studio and 35 percent for one bedroom or up to 35 percent combined. Subject to a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission may authorize a greater ratio of efficiency or one-bedroom units when a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balanced mix of unit sizes and types. (K) In hillside areas, heights shall be limited to 30 feet as specified in Section 17.24.070.D. 1. (L ) On existinGJoto ur reco/d,,¢~'~els less than 3 acres or less than the required minimum frontage ma'~'"'~"~ j -..-'-oT't~Z'be~¢oveloped at the lowest end of the permitted density range. _ Z'" {M) In addi6on to the standatds set forth in Table 17.08.040-B, develooment w#hin the Caryn Planned Commun#y shall be govemed by the standards outlined in Table 17.14.040-A. C. "'""Optional Development Standards. Table 17.08.040-B sets Iorth minimum development standards for residential development projects filed up to the maximum density permitted by the density range. Table 17.08.040-B - Optional Development Standards L Minimum Site Area 5 ac (Gross) Lot Area Varialion (Minimum Net Average) Required Number of Dwelling UnitsrAt (Permitted Per Acre) Up Io 4 Minimum Dwelling Unit Size:('n Single Family Attached and Detached Dwelling Multiple Family Dwellings~*(~ N/R Efficiency/Studio One Bedroom Two Bedroom Three or Moro Bedrooms Lot Dimensions Minimum Width (@ Required Front Setback) Minimum Depth N/R = Not Required LM M MH H 5 ac 5 ac 5 ac 5 ac ~o Variation 5 ac 5 ac Required Up to 8 Up to 14 Up to 24 Up to 30 1,000 square feel((~) regardless of distdct 550 square leet regardless of district N/R N/R N/R Variation Required Variation Required in Single Family Rovisions 650 square feet regardless of district 800 square feet regardless of district 950 square feet regardless of district I Variation N/R N/R Required N/R N/R 17,08-12 6/99' Rancho Cucamong~ Developntent Code (c) Section 17.08.040 Add tO feet for each floor/story above the second floor/story for three- or more-story buildings. Add 5: feet for each floor/story above the second floor/story up to a maximum of 25 feet for three- or more-story buildings. (E) Patio wall/fence and pedestrian walkway may pro~e6t intn he set~pr4wJ~d a minimum 10- foot~ine//~lF and c/ea~caping. ~ ,,,,, ~.~ ~'-'~ f,B, etw~n balconies,"add 5 feet. ( (G) Front is defined as that face of the building or unit with the major glass area and/or major i~dvate ~ recrea§on area and may include access to that p#vate recrea§on area. This access may or may '~ not relate to the primary entrance to the building that faces the street or ddve; therefore, some buildings may have more than one 'front.' No Patio or Recessed Patio/Balcony I I I ! 17.08-17 6/99' Rancho Cucamonga Developmet~t Code Section 17.08.090 (4) Within multiple space garage structures, each car space shall be separated with a solid wall except where two or more spaces are designated to a single dwelling unit. For single garage units, the inside dimension shall be increased to a minimum of 10 feet x 20 feet for convenience of use. LandscapinQ/Open Space~ping~d-o~,un split, must be designed as an integral pad of project~n and enh~C'b the building design,"e~'~nce pub'~iews and spaces,~..~r,d prr~v~e buffers and transitions where needed, with empl~sis~.~_~on com/p~menting grading and softening slope banks. Lands acpig mn ust provide fSr sola7'.% a_j;~ess and shade to facilitate energy conservation. Open space s ouh Id be provided in concentrated areas large enough to provide opportunitie fos r active uses by groups. The appropriate use of landscape materials is an importa. nt. e/ement of s. uc.c. ess. ful development. Plant materials should be used extensively to reinforce c mo munity identity, create a pleasant and livable environment, control eros'on prov'~ , ~d~)rotection from wind and hot summer sun, and to tie new development into the surr uo nding c no text. The ////~ fo/lowing guide/ines are suggested: .... a. Include existing mature trees worthy of preservat'on i/ n the landscape concept. b.Select plant materials for their suitability to the environment and compatibility with Xeriscape principles (i.e., water conservation). c. Select plants that are tolerant of local conditions (i.e., hot summers and seasonal high winds) and relatively free of pests and disease. General criteria for selection includes low maintenance, drought tolerance, heat tolerance, wind tolerance, and fast growing. d. Select plants of appropriate size at maturity for their intended use to minimize maintenance or replacement when the plant outgrows available space. e.Avoid plants that have messy fruit/seed/flower droppings or bdttle branches near paving as they are a potential safety hazard and a long-term maintenance liability. f. Locate plant materials in response to architectural design and site planning. Plants can be used to denote entries, contrast with or reinforce building lines and volumes, and sofien the hard lines or bfank wall expanses of architecture. g. Group plants according to their watering needs. h. Use p/ants to define outdoor spaces such as street edge or outdoor eating areas or movement paths between parking and dwelling units. i. Simple plant palettes are preferred over complex schemes. /. Use deciduous trees on southern and western exposures to screen summer sun, yet permit winter /ight. k. Use evergreen trees to block seasonal high winds and decrease heat loss. Provide/andscape adjacent to and within parking areas in order to shade parking and pavement areas and to minimize the expansive appearance of parking areas~/// Rancho Cucat :.t~,a Development Code n. Section 17~ Maintain adequate sight lines for motorists at intersections and driveways. Densely landscape to screen unattractive views and features, such as parking lots, storage areas, trash enclosures, freeway structures, utility equipment (i.e., transformers, meters, backflow valves), and air conditioning units. o. Trees should be planted to achieve a continuity of form. General guidelines for the use of landscaping to achieve this continuity include: (1)Using the same tree form (i.e., columnar or round headed) along streets of the same type to reinforce the hierarchy of street types. (2) Planting trees in similar patterns on streets of the same type. (3)Using the same species for the entire length of a street or throughout an entire area. (4) Landscape front yard on lots averaging 4,500 square feet or less. (5) Treat driveways with decorative hardscape. (6) Use low maintenance plant materials on corner side yards that will be privately maintained. %,~Fencina/,Screeninq. Fences and walls are discouraged unless needed for a spocilie sc~fety p .~re needed - r male~~[~~[l~ 1 the rt' I d h~tal plane~ are.._n.e...~ed.e..d_d~ ble,,d ~w'th the~ sie and but ildin~-design....-T--he. Fencing should reflect quality and be complimentary to the architectural style. Fencing /~ materialsshouldbeselectedforpermanency. Thefollowingguidelinesaresuggested: a.Provide decorative perimeter fencing (i.e., masonry) at tract edges and along streets. b. Vary wall setbacks adjacent to major thoroughfares to increase visual interest. c. Retaining walls exposed to public view are to be decorative masonry. d. Wood fencing exposed to public view is to be treated with stain, paint, or water e. ~l~a~efencingalongsidepropertylinesmaybewroughtironorblack, plastic-coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. f.Provide a minimum 5-foot setback between fencing on corner side yards and sidewalk. (7. Return walls and corner .side walls to be decorative and compatible with the architectural style. ff more than one style of house design exists, then a simple wall design is preferred. Rancho Cttcamonga Developntettt Code Section 17.08.090 Liqhting. Adequate on-site lighting should be provided to ensure a safe environment while at the same time not cause areas of intense light or glare. Fixtures and poles shall be designed and placed in a manner consistent and compatible with the overall site and building design character. Utilities and Ancillary Equipment. On-site utilities and equipment shall be located in inconspicuous areas away from :public view. Where they are located in public view, they shall be screened with a combination of material that best suits the overall design theme. Gradinq. Development should relate to the natural surroundings and minimize grading by following the natural contours as much as possible. Graded slopes should be rounded and contoured to blend with the existing terrain. Split-level pads, built-up foundations, stepped footings, etc.. can _be used~oderat_e to stoep or,-%d_ient. A~, grading shall.,J,b~.esignedl to c"'Sbe~ement the proj~rientalion, scal~ design,'~ ~,..-ahd tran~,;,;'Ons with surrounding areas. Proper grading techniques that are sensitive to natural conditions must be uh7ized for reasons of public safety, maintenance, aesthetics, and environmental protection. The following guidelines are suggested. ~ a. Minimize the amount of site grading needed for development and util'ty c~ onstruction through proper site planning. ~ b. Grade land and landscape in workable increments to avoid exposing vast expanses of bared earth at any given time to minimize soil erosion. c. Development in the foothills should relate to the slope in order to preserve the integrity of the hillside and minimize disruption of natural ground form. Adapt all structures in such areas to natural ground form through the use of split pads, built- up foundations, stepped footings, stem walls, etc. ~ d. In hillside areas, development to be designed to preserve open spaces, protect natural features, and offer views to residents. e. Roadway alignments and gradients to be designed and located to a void excessive grading and to reflect the existing land forms. f. Round off and contour all graded slopes to blend in with the existing terrain and present a more natural appearance. ~g. Establish proper soil management techniques to reduce the adverse effects (i.e., erosion) of grading. ~h. Provide driveways with a maximum slope of 15 percent. i. Provide an 18-foot area in front of the garage that does not exceed 5 percent. ./. Minimize slopes between lots to preserve privacy. Where slopes cannot be minimized, mitigate concerns through other means, i.e., landscaping, fencing, etc. ~k. Minimize disruption of existing natural features, such as trees and other significant vegetation, natura/ ¢round forms, rock outcroppings, water, and views. Rrtncho Cucatt~ , t~optnent Code Section 17.08.090 10. Fire Safety. Development should be designed in accordance with Fire District requirements for two points of safe and ready access. Areas designated as high fire hazard areas should minimize fuel buifdup around residences through greenbelts or cultivated fuel breaks. 11. Transition of Densitv. The site plan should consider compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods through providing proper tran.~ition qLdensjJy. parti,"q.larly on infill sites 12. Trails. The City of Rancho Cucamonga places significant emphasis on the development ~'of regional, community, and local feeder trails. The General Plan est ba lishes a trail ~ system to provide an interconnected network of trails linking to parks shopping, and ~ employment centers with residential areas. To this end, the following guidelines should be considered: a.AII new developments are to be designed in accordance with the Master Plan of Trails and adopted trail standards. b. Maintain trails on natural surfaces (i.e., no grading) and locate along natural features whenever possible. '""" c.Consider existing bicycling, pedestrian, and equestrian access and traditional travel routes through the property, particularly routes to schools. d. Within the Equestrian/Rural Area, provide trail connections through easements in order to connect disconnected trails and for needed access to recreation activities. e. Provide local feeder' trails on the rear of residential lots for equestrian access and related equestrian service access within the Equestrian/Rural Area. Provide a means of public access to regional trails within subdivisions. g. Within subdivisions, provide an internal loop trail system of local feeder trails. h. Plot houses to provide reasonable rear yard opportunity for the keeping of horses and other animals within the Equestrian/Rural Area. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard of all residential lots within the Equestrian/Rural Area. Grade access from the corral area to the trail with a maximum slope of 5: I and a minimum width of lO feet. ~ Street De.~?. Vary street pa.,,tJ~ to reduc~e monotony. C ili?.,~L_..~.L~ts, ~cs,"tr~nl' yard 12r~l~aping, aria s~ngle-loaded sfruots are ~f'8our gee d to provide streetscape variety and visual interest, particularly in the Low-Medium District. 17.08-49 6/99' Rancho Cucamot~ga Developmet~t Code Section 17.08. 090 14. House Plottinq. Clustering houses around common space, zero lot line, reverse plotting, angling h~use.-~.~t, and s~-~d~,,nt~es ma.y~ted if they vi~/~e-...~ -~ape variety ahd visual in, terest, p~tlicularly in the Low-I~ledium District. / 15. Multi-Family Develol~ment. Well thought-out site planning is crucial in the development ~ of successful projects. In addition to other standards outlined in the Development Code, ,- the foilowing should be considered: a. Relate the location of site uses with adjoining properties to avoid possible conflicts and take advantage of mutual potentials. b. Consider sharing curb cuts with adjoining properties. c. Buildings which are skewed in relationship to each other can create a variety of view orientations and streetscape interests. d. Pro vide adequate common open space, including recrea tiehal facilities, tot lots, and large open lawn areas. e. Logical pedestrian connections between open spaces and dwelling units and to perimeter streets, enhance the quality of life, are safer, and lower maintenance cos rs. f. Create a logical circulation system which is readily understandable to the user. g. Treat drive aisles like the streetscape - curvilinear lanes and parkway trees. h. Screen parking areas from the street with mounding, landscaping, low profile walls, and lowering the grade of parking areas below the street. Screen exterior trash areas, storage areas, utilities, etc. from view using elements compatible with architecture and landscaping. Strengthen project entry statements with expanded accent landscaping, decorative paving and special' architectural features incorporated into perimeter walls or monument signs. Terminate entry statement at an interior focalpoint, such as unique architecture or landscape elements, fountains, plazas, streams and/or waterfall elements, or landscape treatments which take aesthetic advantage of variations in grade. Consider street setbacks on adjacent properties, yet vary setbacks whenever possible. Preserve existing healthy trees in place and design as a major feature. Provide two means of ingress and egress, not including access. Orient bu#dings to focus or) good views. Consider visitor parking be.yond minimum code requirements. 6/99' Rancho C~onga Development Code Section /~ q. Distributeparkingevenlythroughoutproject. r. Avoid dead-end ddve aisles over t50 feet in length. 16. Sinclle-Famitv Development. Placement of houses in single family subdiv!sio. ns,is a..n ~ important element in creating a functional, quality living environment. Single family ~ residential development should promote an attractive streetscape through architectural and site planing design elements that create variety and interest. Housing tracts characterized by repetitious street scenes of nearly identical two-story houses built at the minimum setback lines are not desirable. Generally, it requires the use era combination of design concept solutions to achieve the goal of creating varied, interesting, and attractive streetscapes. a.A void excessive repetition of singte family homes with near identical floor plans and elevations. Vary floor plans and elevations as follows: Number of Single Family I Minimum Number of J Minimum Number of Dwelliqgs I Floor Plans" I Elevations Der Floor Plan 5- 10 3 2 11 -20 4 3 21-40 5: 3 -8o ? 4 81 - I00 8 4 Over 100 1 additional for each 40 dub over 100 4 ' The following may be counted as additional floor plans.' Reverse footprints. (2) Alternate orientation of 90 degrees or greater. . (3) A/tomato garage orientation (i.e., side entry or detached). * clF'r~ ;tearS; sf~g°n it~i~tSn ~ dhi~le nro°nt cCe0 i~"nn ts~ rSeaeCtsld;~;;;ala ;IpeeVaartai~S~s hV~ni~tcio0 unnS;; Ish ;df~lilti°o nWi~ lgedlee Svaigt i~ hasle:men ts which (3) Ph~ns with roof ridges running in different directions. ~(4) Plans with significant changes in roof pitch appropriate to the style. 17.08-51 6/99' Rattc]to C~'a~.tOt2ia Develol~.t¢itt Cottc Vary lot size and lot 'dth 'n ow~ ~ rder to provide clesigners w't~ oph portunities to include significant variations 'n he s~ ue orientations that balance I~vable open. space with mass. For example a wider lot eac tes opportun'ty forgr~ eat,~~rse ap ration between homes and accom,:modates side' entr~. garages.' c. Substantially vary ,~etback and footprint orientation. d. Design house size and nass 'n proport' note th~~ ~ e lot size and lot dimensions. Houses which project a two story el m se tra'ght p av u ~ u t th~ minimum setbacks on small lots are inappropriate.. . . e, Provide extra deep setbacks for t. wo-sto~ ~uses .o~ corner lots..... Providelargerside ds tyar ~bac (k 'e I0 12fee mt 'n'm mt ~ ~ u )~..~ng rag sae ideoflotto f' allow vehicular access to the rear yard. g. Provide greater variation in front yard setback on larger lots (i.e., ~ acre or larger). h. Locate driveways as far as possible from intersections. £ Substantially vary front yard setbacks. j. Provide two means of ingress and egress, not including access. k.. Orient buildings to focus on good views. Vary garage treatments such as detached and semi-detached, side and rear entries, etc. m. On flag lots, use 12-foot width for that portion of the driveway providing access to the garage to minm?ize concrete and maximize landscaping potential. n. Pair garages to create larger front yards, greater separation between driveways, and create variety along the streetscape. o. Taper three- or four-car garage driveways down to a standard two-car width at street. 17. Subdivision Desitin. The proper layout of a subdivision's circulation, drainage, and lot pattern is important to the success of the project. The following guidelines should be considered: a. Provide two means of ingress and egress. b. Use side-on cul-de-sacs, as opposed to standard cul-de-sacs, when adjacent to streets or pedestrian trails. c. Curvilinear streets are to be used whenever possible. A void a grid pattern. d. Maximum 800~foot straight section to avoid long, straight streets. 17,08-52 6/99' Rancho Cuj, a~/~n~'mg~T Developmere Code . . tO conform to the Street Design Policy available from the Engineering Division. ' f. Corner lots are to be wider than interior lots. ~ g. Relate lots and streets to one another to create neighborhoods. ~ h. Relate development to adjacent development relative to street design and lot pattern. i. Avoid long flag lots,, key lots, and lots which side on to the rear of other lots. ~ j. If the tract is bordered or surrounded by undeveloped land, prepare a conceptual ~ subdivision plan for those properties to indicate that logical circulation and drainage can occur. k. Avoid double-frontage lots on interior streets. ~ t. Four-way intersections are generally preferred over offset "T" type on collector or larger streets. m. Avoid four-way, local-to-local intersections. y n. Intersections, including knuckles, are to be perpendicular (radial on curves). ~ o. The maximum length for cul-de-sacs is 600 feet for single-family and 300 feet for ~ multi-familydevelopments. p. Local streets are to be a minimum of 150 feet apart. ~ q. Align intersections with existing streets or provide adequate spacing between ~ intersections. ~ r. Only use private streets where through traffic is not necessary and where the ~ privatestreetisgated. ~ s. For private, gated e,n, trances, provide adequate turn-around space in front of the ~ gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public ~,.~_~ right-of-way. D. Buildi'l~ Desi~~"~ ~ ~ ~ 1. Desiqn Theme. A recognizable design theme shall be established which is compatible with surrounding planned or existing developments and should be based upon prominent design features in the immediate area (e.g., trees, landforms, historic landmarks). Subtle ,variations are encouraged which provide visual interest but do not create abrupt changes causing discord in the overall character of the immediate neighborhood. It is not intended that one style of architecture should be dominant but that individual structures shall create and enhance a high quality and harmonious community appearance. Architecture. The architecture should consider compatibility with surrounding character, including harmonious building style, form, size, color, material, and roof line. Individual dwelling units should be distinguishable from one another and have separate entrances. 17.08-53 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.08.090 Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, projection or recession of stories, balconies, reveals, and awnings contribute to a building's character while aiding in climate control. Further, changes in the roof level or plan,,e.~.~de architectural interest. In particular, Low-Medium and multi- a~.El~e/sffienf t~-~tl'~evelopm~ should be considered: a. Provide architectural treatment to all elevations (i.e., 360-degree architecture). ~ b. If the front era house is sided, then provide siding to the other sides of the house. ~ c. Consider compatibility with surrounding architectural character, including harmonious buildin.{7 style, form, height, size, color, material, and roof line. ~. d. Develop individual expressions within single buildings in harmony with the ~ neighborhood. Refrain from architecturalgimmicks that sacrifice the integrity of the streetscape to a single structure. ~ e. Roof lines are critical to the visual impact of a home. Provide roof fines which ~ rospondtothegeneraldesignofotherroofsalongthestreet. f. Vary roof messing and/or heights on larger buildings. ~ g. Upgrade design treatment of carport structures to reflect the architectural design ~ ofthedwellingunits. /~ h. Enhance architectural elements exposed to public view. ~ i. Vary roof designs along rear elevations of units backing up to perimeter streets to provide a pleasant and varied streetscape. ~ j. Coordinate exterior building design on all elevations from building-to-building to ~ achievethesamelevelofdesignquality. ~ k. On small lot subdivisions, avoid diverse architectural styles. Keep the design ~ statement, materials, and details consistent. The use of mixed, incompatible ~ architectural styles is stro.ngly discouraged. For example, a Cape Cod style is ~ incompatiblewithaSpanishstyle. ~ l. Choose colors consistent with the chosen design theme. Avoid "trendy" colors ~ which become quickly outdated. Low-key and earth-tone colors work best for ~ primarycolors;useofmorevibrantcotorsshoutdbelirnitedtoaccents. ~ m. Provide lockable store.go spaces for multiple family units. ~ n. Use 2-car garages with bonus room on some floor plans or off set the third car ~ space to avoid garages which dominate the streetscape. For multi-family projects, ~ garages should be architecturally designed to compliment the residences; consider ~.~ '~ varying the door treatment on multiple garage structures. ~""~__....~ ~ ,7.08-54. ~ ~9' Rattcho Ct 'a Developme.t Code Section 17.08.090 o. One-story massing is preferred on corner side yards. p. Shadow patterns created by architectural elements such as overhangs, trellises, reveals and recesses, and awnings contribute to a building ~ character while aiding in climate control. q. A void identical or s~rmilar elevation schemes plotted on adjacent lots or across the street from one another. r. Avoid identical color schemes plotted on adjacent lots. s. Integrate screens Ior all roof-mounted equipment into the building design (i.e., extend parapet walls) rather than as an afterthought. t. Design roof line in conjunction with building mass for consistent composition. u. On hillsides, design the form, mass, and profile of buildings and architectural features so as to compliment the natural topography. v. Use native rock for fieldstone. Other forms of stone may be manufactured products. w. Design chimney stacks with accent materials used on the house, such as brick or stone, except on interior chimneys. s~s, street Iocations,'"and s~.~r~od'nding ~velopmenls. Setbacks and overall heights should provide an element of openness and human scale. Multiple family product type (i.e., apartment, condominium, townhouse) is discouraged immediately adjacent to lower density single family areas All attached projects adjacent to existing one-story single family developments shall be one story, unless the impact of two-story structures on the existing one-story neighborhood is fully mitigated with emphasis on privacy, views, and general compatibility. Buildings should emphasize horizontal as well as vertical appearance. This could be achieved by the use of projections or recessions of stories, balconies, windows and doors, and changes in roof levels and planes. In particular for multiple family product type, buildings over three stories should consider stepping back. Materials and Colors. Colors, textures, and materials shall be coordinated to achieve total compatibility of design. The materials and colors chosen should complement the building character. .Signing. Every building shall be designed with a precise concept for adequate signing. Provisions for sign placement, sign scale in relationship with building, and readability shall be considered in developing the signing concept. While providing the most effective signing, it shall also be highly compatible with the building and site design relative to color, material, and placement. Equipment Screeninq. Any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building, or ground, shall be screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally compatible in lerms of material, color, shape, and size. The screening design shall blend with the building design. Where individual equipment is provided, a continuous screen is desirable. 17.08-55 6/99 CHAPTER 17.10 - COMMERCIAL/OFFICE DISTRICTS Section 17.10.010 - Purposes and General Plan Consistency .............. 17.10-1 Section 17.10.020 - Commercial Office Districts ........................ 17.10-1 Section 17.10.030- Use Regulations ................................. 17.10-2 Section 17.10.040 - Site Development Criteria ......................... 17.10-12 Section 17.10.050 - Performance Standards .......................... 17.10-15 Section 17.10.060 - General Design Guidelines ........................ 17.10-17 Section 17.10.070 - Trip Reduction ................................. 17.10-26 Rancho Cttcamonga Development Code Section 17.10.060 Section 17.10.060- General Design Guidelines Intent:. The intent of the guidelines is to assist the designer in understanding and complying with the City's standards for building and site design. The guidelines are based upon community design goals as expressed in the General Plan and encourage the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property along with associated facilities, such as signs, landscaping, parking areas, and streets. The guidelines establish a high standard for design quality but are flexible enough to allow individual expression and imaginative solutions. Applicabifitv. The provisions ol this section shall apply to all commercial and office districts, unless otherwise specified herein. Any addition, remodeling, relocation, or construction requiring a building permit within any commercial or office district is subject to Development/Design Review pursuant to Chapter 17.06. Guidelines. These guidelines are under the two major categories of site plan design and building design. The structure and its relationship to other structures, uses, views, existing site condition, and pedestrian orientation, should be the dominant factors in the design and orientation of buildings. Architectural statements, while being strong, should not conflict from site to site or building to building. 1. Site P~an Desiqn. a.. Existinq Site Conditions. Existing site conditions such as mature vegetation, slopes, draina e..~...~ourses, rock outcroppings, and view~ all h~ c,,~sidered ~ pu$3'~;Zi,titi'~ for'll~ei.u~lu.~ h~ t rh~~'Oable e)fisting site ,///~ will assist in 1ormulating a focused design theme, as suggested belo~ '" (1) Relate the location of site uses with adjoining properties to avoid possible conflicts and take advantage of mutual potentials. ",% (2) Provide buffer where site adjoins residential development, i.e., increased ~/ setbacks, height limited to one-story, and dense landscaping.. . ~,, (3) Consider street setbacks on adjacent properties. While variety is generally 'i~' desired, the street rnust function as a whole and the setbacks must relate. ( (4) Preserve existing, mature streets usa focal point. ,. //b. Building Orientation. Placement of the buildings shall be... d.one in_...a ma..nne, r [ compatible with surrounding existing and planned uses and but. I i. n__..d gs The. set.b.a. ck ~ from streets and adjacent properties is directly proportionate to the scale of the ./) proposed building and those around it. Larger buildirgs l, w~l. r quir. m.e e. ore s te back. / area for a balance of scale and for the protection of Isoar. a.cces....s tot. eh pro?.os..ed ( building and adjacent sites. Lastly, placement of th be 'ldu~ ing should provide the ~ most aesthetic public views. The following guidelines should also be considered: / (I) Pict buildings to create plazas and logical pedest~ian connecli~s.' ~ (2) Formultiple buildings, varyplacement to avoid a 'ngpr~ areas wh~~ch dominate ~ streetscape '~ ~'"'"~~-1~1 ?FO':-8 6/99' Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.10.060 4' (3) Avoid"strip-commercial appearance where buildings are plotted in a straight r~ing along entire street frontage. c. Access/Circulation. The access and circulation of a development should be designed to provide, a safe and efficient system, both on and off the site. Points of access shall be designed in conformance with the City's access regulations, The circulation system shall be designed to reduces conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on adjacent properties, combine circulation and access areas where possible, and provide adequate maneuvering areas. Points of ac~c~~o, ~ftiet it~thor plartD,~ or oxid. tit /~kCays shall connect every building {vith public The following ~.. ( guidelines should also be considered: (1) Possible sharing access with adjoining properties. /~' (2) Align access with existing driveways, intersections, or median openings. [ (3) Circulation system to address needs of both motorists and pedestrians. Avoid designs that create vehicle/pedestrian conflicts. f (4) Provide two means of ingress and egress, not including emergency-only ,~ access. ;). (5) Avoid dead-end parking a/s/es. ~k (6) Access points must conform to the City's access control policies and standards. k,. (7) Maintain adequate sight lines for motorists at intersections and driveways. d. Parkinq Areas. Parking areas should not be the dominant element in the overall design of a project and should be designed to minimize visual disruption. Parking areas should be screened from streets through a combination of mounding. landscaping, low profile walls, and grade separations. The design of parking areas should also minirnize auto noise, lights and.....¢~[are. a~e..~air tem?.p~ ./This'"d~ilTbeve~omplisf~t0. through the u~J~ of sound we[is, genera-'H(3e'alion, use //--,"'~well-designed lights, and landscaping throughout the parking lot. The followlog ~ guidelinesshouldalsobeconsidered: ~ (1) Screen parking areas from public view with mounding, landscaping, low ~ wal/s, gradedifferentials, andbuildingorientation. ~:~ (2) For parking areas, include one tree for every three parking stalls for shade. ~k. (3) Distribute parking evenly throughout. "~ (4) Consider the types of users desired and park project accordingly rather than k~ trying to maximize building floor area. e. Landscape/Open Space. Landscaping and open spaces should be designed as an integral part of the overall site plan design. Landscaping and open spaces should enhance the building design, public views, and spaces and provide for a 17. t 0-19 6/99' Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.10. 060 balance of solar uses, screening, and buffers and transitions. Additionally, the landscape design should accent t?e..~zv.a~design theme t,.~O_~ _~t:,fCl'l~OrS or trell's-'es" har~ clscape%,affd spec~,, a-'"'t'l~ving. 'The following ~/~ guidelines shoutd also be considered: .. (1) Clearly delineate on-site pedestrian walkways with special pavement, landscaping, andlighting. (2) Create astrongentrystatementwithtexturedpavementatprojectentrances. (3) For industrial projects, provide plazas where employees can rest and eat lunch, preferably away from public entrances to buildings, loading areas, or °ther high'trafficareas'Pr°videtables'benches'shadetrees'°rstructures' (4) The appropriate use of plant materials is an important element of successful development. Plant materials should be used extensively to reinforce community iclentity, create a pleasant and livable environment, control erosion, provide protection from wind and hot summer sun, and to tie new development into the surrounding context. (5) Locate plants in response to architectural design and site planning. Plants can be used to denote entries, contrast with or reinforce building lines and volumes, and soften hard lines or blank wall expanses. (6) Select plants for their year-round interest, as well as their form, texture, and shaPe values' (7) Provide canopy shade trees in parking areas. (8)Use mixture of evergreen and deciduous trees along streetscape for year- round interest. (9)Twenty percent of industrial projects and thirty percent of commercial and office project.,; are to be 24-inch box size. (10) preserveexistingmaturetreesasafocalpoint. . (11)On southern and western exposures, use deciduous trees for summer shade and winter sun. (12)Use evergreen trees to block seasonal high winds, screen unsightly features, and decrease heat loss. (13) Provide special landscaping treatment, such as intensifying the density (size and/or number) of trees, accent trees, and special paving, at all project entries and building entrances. (15) Select plants of appropriate size at maturity for their intended use to minimize maintenance or replacement when plant outgrows the available space. 17,10-20 6/99' Rancho Cucamongg~r"~lopment Code Section 17.10.060 //~ (16) A void plants that have messy fruit/sood/flower droppings or brittle.branches [ nearpaving o's theyare a potentialsafety hazardandlong-term maintenance //~ liability. / (17) Use plants to define outdoor spaces such as street edge, outdoor plazas, or ( movementpathsbetweenparkingandbuildingentrances. ~ ~k (18) Simple plant palettes are preferred over complex schemes. // /> (19) Provide dense landscaping to screen unattractive views and features, such / as parking lots, loading and storage areas, trash enclosures, freeway structures, utility equipment (i.e., transformers, meters, backflow valves), and air conditioning units'. ~ XERISCAPEGUII)ELINES / e Select plant tnaterial.~ Jbr their suitability to the environment ttttd / cotnl~atibilitv with Xeriscape princil, h's. f 4, Use drought re.~'istant plants. e Group plants according to dteir watering needs. · Minimize turf by itsbig more ground cover or decorative hardjcape.. ~ See Xeri.wtt[,e: A Guide 7~ Water Con.yet'vtttiottj~rfitrthcr infiJrtnation. (20) Plant trees to achieve a continuity of form. General guidelines for the use of ~ landscapingtoachievethiscontinuityinclude: ~, (a) Using t,he same tree form (i.e., columnar or round headed) along %, streets of the same type to reinforce the hierarchy of street types. (b) Planting trees in similar patterns on streets of the same type. ~ (c) Using the same species for the entire length of a street or throughou,..~./" f. Fencinq/Screeninq. The use of any fencing or walls should be consistent with the overall design theme. Fences and walls are discouraged unless needed for a specific screening or safety purpose. Where they are needed, color, material, and variation of the vertical/horizontal plane are needed to blend with the site and building design. Orient loading areas away from the street. Where it is necessary for loading areas to face the street, screen them with buildings, walls, and landscaping. Liqhting. On-site lights should provide a safe, functional, and aesthetic design. Enough lighting should be provided to ensure a safe environment while at the same time not cause areas el intense light or flare. Fixtures and poles shall be designed and placed in a manner consistent and compatible with the overall site and building design. 17.10-21 6/99' Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.10.060 Utilities and Ancillary Ecluipment. On-site utilities and equipment shall be located in inconspicuous areas, away from public view. Where they are located in public view, they shall be screened with a combination of material that best suits the overall design theme. i. Transit Improvements. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided if determined necessary by the City Engineer and City Planner in consultation with the local transit provider. ( j. Master Plannincl. The intent of a Master Plan is to "plan ahead' and look beyond ~. the limits of a particular property to solve circulation, drainage, and neighborhood ( compatibifity problems. Through the Master Plan process, there is opportunity to ~. provide for integrated development and coordinate the efforts of many property "',>. owners and discourage piecemeal development. Master planning of defined areas /' will avoid development in a manner which would prevent or preclude future ( development ofsurrounfff? land in the best way possible. The intent of the Master Plan process is not to ca.~t future development patterns in stone; rather, it is an ,\ attempt to discover problems before they develop, to deal with issues while they (r can be solved, and to take advantage of opportunities while they exist. The following guidelines for Master Planning should be_consiclered: (1) Base the area of a Master Plan on logical planning boundaries and site conditions, rather than being limited by individual parcel lines. (2) Encourage harmoniious site plan relationships, such as the potential for shared access and reciprocal parking. (3) At minimum, a Master Plan must address conceptual building locations, overall circulation, points of ingress and egress, parking layout, and conceptual grading and drainage. Areas for common use, such as shared access or pedestrian plazas, must be identified. Master Plans may be rcquired by the z. oning of a property or where deemed neces.~ac}' by the City Planturn (4) (5) (6) Provide a statement of architectural intent and/or conceptual elevations which include style, various product types, form, bulk, height, orientation, and materials. Future development may be allowed to vary from a Master Plan provided the proposed project is compatible with the intent el the Master Plan or develops an acceptable alternative Master Plan. For larger master planned projects, develop a package of design guidelines to guide future individual buildings and maintain the integrity of the Master Plan concept 17.. 10-22 6/99' Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sccti(m 1 Z 10.060 2. Buildinq Desiqn. a. Design Theme/Architecture. A recognizable design theme shall be established for each building. That theme shall be one which creates a harmonious building style, form, size, color, material, and roof line, as it relates to surrounding planned or existing development. Subtle variations are encouraged which provide visual interest but do not create abrupt changes caus'mg discord in the immediate area ~t is..:_.__..~not inte dn ed~.JJ~..,~e of"aYbhitecture shffuld be f.-'"'"'--"'d'01:~ant, but t11'at~fividu~hall create and enhance a high quality and harmonious community appearance. The following guidelines shall be considere~ ~, (1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga seeks well thought out design solutions ~ which reflect the best of a particular style, respect the community's heritage, and relate well to their surroundings. (2) Provide architectural treatment to all elevations (i.e., 360-degree architecture). ' (3) Make medium- and high-rise buildings less imposing by physically stepping them back from the street level. (4) Design rear elevations to be visually attractive by providing articulation to the building plane and vertical variation of the roof line. (5) Avoid expanses of blank wall that are devoid of any articulation or embellishment. (6) Integrate screening for roof-mounted equipment into the building design (i.e., extend parapet walls) rather than ha ving a "tacked-on" appearance. (?) (~) (9) (~o) (I I) (12) (~3) For commercial projects, vary the roof through the use of vertical separations, varying roof structure, or by varying the parapet line or ridge line. For commercial projects, give special attention to creating pedestrian scale and an inviting place for pedestrians to shop. Provide interest and variation to storefront designs for shopping centers to complement the architectural style. Design elements to be considered include: provicling offsets or bays, strong base material, varying storefront treatment, multi-pane windows, and varying the bulkhead treatment. Provide focal points in the architectural theme to create strong entry statements and provide a sense of place. Towers, spirals, domes, massing, color, trellises, fountains, public art, and plazas are encouraged. Provide shelter from seasonal high winds through building orientation, materials, and entrances, particularly east of Haven Avenue. Paint roll-up doors and service doors to blend-in with main building colors. Architectural style should have a timeless quality rather than trendy des~ that quickly become "dated." ~ 17.10-23 6/99' ~'~ (14) Architectural dotail$ can introduco accont colors: howovor, avoid too many ) bright co/ors which overpower the building. (15) Fit buildings into their context, including architectural style, massing, and proportion. . .......... (16) Design to be sensitive to, but not necessar7y mim'~ /c ad, joimn' g ~h'storic structures. (17) Consider site amenities, such as walls hardscape s, , treet furniture, trash enclosures, lighting, and monument signs as part of the total rca hitectural package for the project. (18) Screen drive-thru lanes from public view by orienting the building and a combination of landscaping, barming, and low screen walls. (19) For shopping centers, vending machines and newspaper racks are to be recessed into the building facade. (20) Completely screen tong-term shopping cart storage. (23) For industrial buildings, design the offbe oDd'on sa t~ ~ he ar hc itectural focus with the appearance of an office bullring 'n te~ / rrns of detat7 and amount of glass. (24)For industrial buildings, provide two primao/ build'ng m~ ta erials, as required by Planning Commission Resolution No 89 158 su. - , ch as concrete, textured Scale. The mass and scale of the building needs to be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street locations, and surrounding developments. No matter what the scale of a building, setbacks and overall height should provide an element of openness and human scale. Multi-story buildings should be set back toward the center of the site or be designed in a stepped style. Materials and Colors. Colors, textures, and materials shall be coordinated to achieve total compatibility ol design. They should blend well with the environment and not cause abrupt changes. Equipment Screeninq. Any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building, or ground, shall be screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally integrated in Ierms of material, color, shape, and size. The screening design shall blend with the buih:ling design. Where individual equipment is provided, a continuous screen is desirable. ,¸ ~SiqnincL Every building shall be designed with a precise concept for adequate signing. Provisions 1or sign placement; sign scale in relationship with building and readability shall be considered in developing the signing concept. While providing the most effective 17.10-24 6/99' Rancho Cucamonga Developmettt Code ..,~~,~S~cm,xl 7.10.060 signing, it shall also be highly c at~ the building and site design reV"~ative~o color, mate~rial, a..o.d plaoe¢'Efif~. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's goal is to promote a qu.~vl~ua~rfvironment by allowing signs which are compatible with their surroundings /nd'which effectively communicate their message. / a. Combininq Siqns and Architecture. I (1) Integrate signs into the architectural scheme. Indeed, the building itself can ~ serve as a large and impressive sign. To achieve this effect, however, the ~ individual signs on the facade must reinforce the character of the building, ~ not obscure it or detract from it. / / (2) Use signs as a means of business identification rather than as a form of /advertising. ~ (3) Simplemessages, layout, andcolorschememakesignseasiertoread. f (4) Select co/ors and materials which complement the architecture, including ~ monument signs. [ (5) Size of signs must be proportional to the scale of the building and their ~ affixed surface. X~ (6) Use wall sign placement to direct the customer to the business location. / (7) Visually balance the sign area with the building mass and height rather than designing to the maximum standard. b. Office and Industrial. (1) Consider the layout and shape of the architectural features of the building. Design elements such as windo w patterns (vertical and horizontal rectangles, arches, squares, etc.) will help determine the sign shape that will suit the building. (2) For industrial buildings, use a non-illuminated type of sign because they are typically not open at night, nor do they need to attract customers like a retailer. (3) Use individual letters rather than canister type signs. c. Uniform Siqn Proqrams. (1) Provide a Unilorm Sign Program for shopping centers and office or industrial complexes with multiple buildings to create a coordinated project theme of uniform design elements, such as color, lettering style, and placement. (2)Specify a consistent sign type and avoid mixing different sign types, such as canister signs with channelized letters. (3) Use a consistent size (i.e., maximum height and length) which is proportionate to the building. ----"~"~'-'-"1~ O- 25 6/99' Rancho Cucamon,~//~evelopment Code Sections 17.10. 060 & / (4) For shopping centers, use an 18-inch maximum letter height. For buildings ~. plotted at the street setback line, use a 12-inch maximum letter height. /////~> (5)~signlengthtobenogreaterthan65,o70percentoftheleasedspace~ ! (6) Major anchor tenants may have variation in sign letter style, color, and size ~ (i.e.,height, area, length). ~ For further information regarding sign design, p/ease refer to the Guide ~ (7) For sign programs with a single lettering style, up to three colors may be \ used. Where lettering styles vary, use a single color to maintain a consistent ~ theme. / (8) Use a single letter style and co/or for small projects. ~ (9) Select colors for day and night visibility. For example, certain shades of blue ~, (10) ~og~e(i~,d~r~ice~mW~ll;tmn~t~eusedtoretaincorporateortrademark Section 17.10.070 - Trip Reduction A minimum of one shower facility accessible to both men and women shall be provided for persons walking or bicycling to work for each project which. meets the following thresholds: Commercial 250,000 square feet Industrial 325.000 square feet Office 125,000 square feet Hotels and Motels 250 rooms 17.10-26 6/99' CHAPTER 17.12 - PARKING REGULATIONS Section 17.12.010 - Purpose and General Plan Consistency .............. 17.12-1 Section 17.12.020- Basic Regulations For Off-Street Parking .............17.12-1 Section 17.12.030 - Design Standards ................................ 17.12-2 Section 17.12.040 - Parking Requirements ........................... 17.12-10 Rat, cho Cucamonga Development Code Sectiott 17.12.030 Driveways providing access to garages, carports, and parking areas serving three or less dwelling units shall be a minimum of 10 feet in width for one-way traffic and 20 feet for two-way traffic, Driveways providing access to garages, carpods, and open parking spaces serving four or more dwelling units shall be a minimum of 12 feet in width for one-way traffic and 24 feet for two-way traffic. Driveways serving multiple dwelling units with garages or carports on either or both sides shall be increased a minimum of 5 feet on one side only, thus providing a 29-foot wide access way between garage or carport spaces for two-way traffic. No property owner shall sublease, sub-rent, or otherwise make available to residents of other properties the off-street parking spaces required by this section. All required covered off-street parking spaces shall be located conveniently accessible to the dwelling unit served by such parking space. Residential development,,; which provide private streets, shall be planned, designed, and constructed to meet the minimum City Engineering requirements for private streets. Any secondary paved driveway or extension of the primary driveway shall not be used for parking unless: (1) it connects the primary driveway access to a second access point with the street or public right-of-way (i.e. circular driveway} with a continuous pavement width not exceeding 12 feet; (2) it is an extension of the primary driveway toward the nearest side or rear yard area; or (3) is constructed pursuant to an approved Minor Development Review. C. Commercial, Institutional, and Community Facilities. The following design standards shall apply to Commercial, Institutional, and C:omm, unity Facility uses. Those areas designated for use by motorcycles shall consist of a minimum usable area of 56 square feet. Parking bay widths shall be computed according to the specifications set forth in Table 17.12.030-A. 3. Two-way access driveways with no parki....j[3osheH.be-a~'~26 feet shall be_prov...jded-wnere necu,~¢#3Ffor emergency vehi(~le access, One-way ,:':'Tccess~"-,,% ~"'Sriveways-'~ith no parking shall be a minimum of 12 feet. Industrial Districts. The following design standards shall apply to su es wtthm t' ' he l~dustria/ Districts, In order to prevent traffic congestion, promote busine ss and enhance pu lb ic safety, off street parking and loading facilities shall be provided as set forth h eer in The f c. ~'litia es required by this section for parking and maneuvering of motor vehicles are assure de to.be the minimum standards necessary for such use. The following shall apply to the Industrial districts: Parkinq F~cilities. 1. Required parking shall be located on the same site with the main us of thee building, on '~ premises contiguous thereto, or in' a location in accordance 'th aw~ n approved development ~. plan. 17.12-6 6/99~ / 2. Carpools/Vanpoofs - Ol%street parking close to the building shall be provided for ~ commercial/office/industn~l facilities at a rate of 10 percent of the total parking area ~ designatedforusebycarpoolsandvanpools. If covered, theverticalclearanceshallbeno J _ less than 9 feet. _ ~ 3. Allparking areas shall be screened from public view through the use of barres, landscaping ~ material, andlowwalls. h L°adinqFacilities' ~ 1. Allloadingfacilitiesandn~laneuveringareasmustbeonsitewithth~use.~ \ 2. All loading facilities shall be perrnitted only in the rear and interior side yard areas except ,~ within the Heavy Industrial district and rail-served buildings. ~ 3. Aisle width to the loading docks shall be a minimum of 50 feetplus adcl'm'onalwidth for truck / parking (typically 40 to 50 feet). 4. Loading docks shall be set back a minimum of 70 feet from street property line. ~ 5. Parking stalls for trailers ,<;hall be 50 feet by 14 feet and provided at a ratioof1 tsall per ~ truckloadingdockdoor. '~ 6. Loading facilities shall be adequatefy screened from the public view except within the Heavy / Industrial district and railisj,~,~d~.~jldings. / 7. Minimum aisle width adjacent to loading areas, without dock-high doors, shall be for one way and 28 feet for two way. ",~. Parkincl Facility Design. Followi,ng are charts and diagrams to which all park'ng fac'~ dities shall~,.,.,/ (, be designed. , 1. 'Padd~c~BavWidths. EachpaKinglacii[yisoesg eo ' pa ' gDayu 'S. e ' or width of this unit is dependent on one- or two-way traffic and single- or double-loaded aides. Use the following table to determine the overall width of lhe parking bay design which is being used. The dimensions listed are the amount necessary to contain parking stall depth and aisle width without overhang. Parallel parking may be permitted; however. it must not be counted as part of the required driveway width and must maintain 4 feet between spaces 17.12-7 6/99' Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 1Z 12.040 e. Libraries: 1 space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area. Private clubs, lodge halls, union, headquarters: 1 space for each 75 square feet of gross floor area. Churches and other places of assembly not specified above: 1 space for each four fixed seats within the main auditorium or 1 for each 35 square feet of seating area within the main auditorium where there are no fixed seats; 18 linear inches of bench shall be considered a fixed seat. 6. Other Uses. ay nurs ding preschools and nursery c ~~ .... member, plus 1 for every live children. 7. Public Utitit¥ and Like Uses. //~ a. Pubfic utility facilities including, but not limited to, electric, gas, water, t I h eep onean telegraph facilities not having business offices on the premises: 1 space for every two employees in the largest shift plus I space for each vehicle used in connection with the use. A minimum of 2 spaces shall be provided for each such use regardless of building space or number of employees. C. Industrial. Warehousincl, and Manufacturinq. 1. Parkinq Spaces Required. The total parking space count shall be determined by the summation of individual use parking demands based upon the following rates: a. Warehousing or building for storage: I space per 1,000 square feet for the first 20,000 square feet; 1 space per 2,000 square feet for the second 20,000 square feet; I space per 4,000 square feet for all space in excess of the first 40,000 square feet. b. Industrial/Manufacturing: t space per 500 square feet. c. Research and Development: 1 space per350 square feet (research services only). d. Office and Administration: 1 space per 250 square feet. e. Multi-use tenant buildings where office use does not exceed 35 percent of building area: I space per 400 square feet. f. The following interior building areas can be deducted from the overall parking requirements: electrical/mechanical rooms, elevator shafts, stairwells, and multi- story lobbies. g. Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial Use.' 1 space per 100 square feet. Alternatively, as part of the Conditional Use Permit review, the Planning Commission may allow 1 space per 150 square feet subject to presentation of traffic and parking studies, 17.12-14 6/99' 2. Bicycle and Other Two-Wheel Vehicular Facfiities. Bicycle storage facilities a tt he rate of one rack or locker per 30 spaces (minimum of a three-bike rack) shall be provided within all development ancl relate to planned and existing bicycle trails in accordance with the Development Code requirements. For developments with at least 40 total parking spaces, required on-site parking may be reduced at a rate of I automobile parking space per 4 spaces of bicycle storage, up to 50 automobile parking spaces or 10 percent of the total required on-site parking, whichever is less, w. here locker rooms and showers are provided for employees to promote bicycle Spe ~a---1-Rec q"i:llre~ents. The following parking requirements are applicable to multi-family residential, commercial, and office land uses as designated. Special stalls shall be closest to the facility for which they are designated in order to encourage their use. Handicapped: Those commercial and office facilities with 25 or more spaces, shall designate 2 percent or 1 space, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. The designation and design shall conform to state standards. Motorcycle: Commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking spaces shall provide at least 1 designated parking area for use by motorcycles. Developments with over 100 spaces shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of 1 percent. Areas delineated for use by motorcycles shall meet standards set forth in Subsection 17.12.030-C-1. Bicycle Storage: Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all multi-family residential projects of more than 10 units, commercial, office, and industrial districts in accordance with the following: Minimum spaces equal to 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces or 3 bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. Alter the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. CarpootsNanpools: Off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercial/office/industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area as designated for use by carpools and vanpools. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. Drive-Thru Facilities: Drive-thru facilities require special consideration as their design can significantly impact the vehicular circulation on a site. The following requirements apply to any use with drive-thru facilities. Each drive-thru lane. shall be separated from the circulation routes necessary for ingress or egress from the property or access to any parking space. b. Each drive-thru lane shall I:)e striped, marked, or otherwise distinctly delineated. 17.12-15 6/99' CHAPTER 17.14 - SPECIFIC PLANS & PLANNED COMMUNITIES DISTRICT Section 17.14.010 - Purpose and General Plan Consistency ............... 17.14-1 Section 17.14.020 - Specific Plan District/Planned Community ............. 17.14-1 Section 17.14.030 - Adopted Specific Plans (SP) ....................... 17.14-7 Section 17.14.040 - Adopted Planned Communities ..................... 17.14-8 Rancho Cttcatttonga Development Cocle Sections 1 Z 14.020 & 1 Z 14.030 H. Amendments to Development Plan. A development plan text and map may be amended in the same manner as provided by Section 17.02.060 for a change of District boundaries or for a change in the regulations ap,plicable with a District. Amendment of a development plan text and map shall be subject to the same findings as prescribed for initial enactment of a Specific Plan District/Planned Community and adoption of the development plan applicable to the Specific Plan District/Planned Community. An amendment to a development plan text and map may be initiated by the City Planning Commission or the Council, or may be initiated by the original applicant for the Specific Plan District/Planned Communiity or a successor thereto, provided such applicant or successor has, at the time of application for an amendment, a continuing controlling interest in development or management of uses within the planned community zone. I. Review of Development Progress. The Director of Community Development shall review each Specific Plan District/Planned Community annually, and shall submit a report to the Planning Commission and City Council containing the following: A summary of the development status within the zone and an assessment of progress during the year toward completion of development authorized by the development plan including adherence to development schedules and phasing. A statement of any changes in land use and economic development trends, housing market indicators, commercial and industrial development rates, or programs for provision o~ public facilities and services which, in the opinion of the City Planner, vary significantly from those upon which the developmenl plan were based and which could affect adversely continued progress toward completion of development within the district. A copy of the annual report of the City Planner shall be provided to the applicant and to such other interested parties or successors as deemed appropriate by the City Planner. Section 17.14.030 - Adopted Specific Plans~(_SP~~ The ,ollovyin'g-Uescrib-~d project~ lanr~hadO)Ptmefllua~l~ i~;veea:oPDroJeenr~,; ~ae~img;na;~dndSiPne~fic ~ltvan21Sre kP!; ..A.r..9~yzef each text shall be kep ' e Co ,n ' y p p ' e C'ty Clerk's /[office.~'Additional specific plans, not listed here, may be adopted from time-to-time. Also, these t/ existing plans may be amended. Development within each of these plans is subject to the ~,. Development Review Process as outh:ned in Chapters 17.04 and 17.06.. A. --"Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP). The Eftwanda Specific Plan encompasses approximately 3,000 acres bounded on the north, northwest, and east by current city limits; on the south by the centerline of Foothill Boulevard;; and on the west by the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Comrnunity. It also includes all properties located within 200 feet of the centerline of Eftwanda Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and 24th S~reet and the area south of Foothill Boulevard, east of Et:iwanda Avenue, and north of Arrow Route. It excludes the area south of Miller Avenue and west of Eftwanda Avenue. t 7.14-7 6/99 Rancho.~'f~monga Development Code Sections & 017. 14.030 /~B F thfil I v r / / . oo ' Bou e a d Specific Plan (FSP]. The Foothifi Boulevard Specific Plan was originally f adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 1987. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan was ~ established to facilitate development and enhance Foothill Boulevard, which is the most /~ significant commercial corridor in the City. The FSP area stretches from Grove Avenue on the ( west (City of Up/and), to East Avenue on the east (City of Fontana). The Foothill Boulevard ~ SpecificP/anwasincorporatedintotheDevelopmentCodeasChapter17.32. / C. /ndustria/Area Specific Plan (ISP). The Industrial Area Specific P/an was originally adopted by [ the City of Rancho Cucamonga in 1981. The ISP area is located in the southern portion of the ~ City, encompassing nearly 5,000 acres. The Industrial Area Specific Plan was incorporated 3 intotheDevelopmentCodeasChapter17.30. ~ D. IndustrialArea Specific Plan Subarea 18 Specific Plan. The ISP Subarea 18 Specific Plan was ~ adopted in 1994 by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Subarea 18 Specific Plan is located ~ east of Haven Avenue, approximately one mile west of the I- 15 Freeway. The site is bounded ~ on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken A venue, on the north by the A T&SF railroad '~ tracks, and on the west by Cleveland A venue and Utica Street. The Subarea 18 Specific Plan ~ is an amendment to the ISP and although the ISP has been incorporated as Development Code Chapter 17.30, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan remains as a separate document. ^ Section 17.14r7040 - Adopted Planned Communities ~ -- The following-described communities are adopted and their real property is designated Planned Community (PC) on the Land Use District Map. A copy el each Planned Community text shall be kept in the Community Development Departmenl and in the City Clerk's office. Certified copies of each land use plan are maintained on file in the City's Planning Division. Additional planned communities not listed here, may be adopted from time-to-time. In addition, the existing plans may be amended. Develop_ment.~ithin JJ3e-Elasned Communities is subject to the Development Review Process as ./.77~d in Cha-'~s 17.04 an~"(~..06, -'y'" ~ A. Catyn Planned Community (Vintaqe Hiqhlands - Kaufman and Broad, Inc. and Martborouqh Development Company). The Caryn Planned Community encompasses approximately 244 acres located between Highland Avenue (Foothill Freeway corridor) on the south and Banyan Avenue on the north and between Milliken Avenue on the west and Rochester Avenue on the east. The Caryn Planned Community has been incorporated into the Development Code as a Low- Medium Residential land use district (refer to Section 17. 08.040). In addition to the standards outlined in Section 17.08.040, the standards outlined in Table 17. 14.040-A are applicable to all ~levelopment within the Caryn Planned Community. Table 17,14. 040-A - Caryn Planned Community Development Standards DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Setbacks Front yard 18 feet (from property line) Corner side yard I0 feet (from property line) 6/99' Rear yard 5 feet (12 feet minimum between structures) s~a~cC~trreaSi/as,bcUtodmngmPone armrea~;,ntoTen pNeOn~Si~ttbe~ar~qut~i. nr~d~h~roO~n~gliSnteO' structures are rearyards, subjecttoCityPlannerapprovaL Lot Coverage (impervious surface) 60% (Includes trellis/beam construction) Prolections into required setbacks sFt,~uecPtluarC~suO~jebc~Yto~/e~udOirv~di~etnbOtac~.ns; .,/x~der part of Terra Vista (Lewis Homes). Planned Community 81-01 is comprised of approximately 1,321 acres and begins at the northeast corner ot Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, traversing north to the Pacific Electric Railroad; thence east to the centerline of Milliken Avenue; thence south to the centerline of Base Line; thence east to centerline of Rochester; thence south to the centerline of Foothill Boulevard; thence west to the beginning point of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Victoria Planned Community (William Lyon Company). Planned Community 80-01 encompasses approximately 2,150 acres and begins at the southwest corner of Highland and Etiwanda Avenues; south abutting the westerly boundary of the Etiwanda Specific Plan to the 1-15 Freeway; thence southwest to Day Creek; thence north to Base Line Road; thence west to Milliken Avenue; thence north to the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks; thence west to the Deer Creek Channel; thence north to Highland Avenue; thence east to Etiwanda Avenue. Each of the specific plans and planned communities have been designated on the District map. Certified copies of each land use plan are maintained on file in the City's Planning Division. Additional planned communities not listed here, may be adopted from time-to-time. Also, the existing plans may be amended. Development within the planned communities is subject to the review process as contained in Chapters 17.04 and 17.06. 17.14-9 6/99' CHAPTER 17.30 - INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS Section 17.30.010 - Purpose and General Plan Consistency ............... 17.30-1 Section 17.30.020 - Industrial Development Districts .....................17.30-5 Section 17.30.030 - Use Regulations ................................. 17.30-6 Section 17.30.040 - Site Development Criteria ......................... 17.30-20 Section 17.30.050 - Performance Standards .......................... 17.30-39 Section 17.30.060- General Design Guidelines ........................ 17.30-41 Section 17.30.070 - Trip Reduction ................................. 17.30-50 Section 17.30.080 - Overlay Districts & Subarea Development Standards ... 17.30-51 Sections 17.30.010 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code CHAPTER 17.30 Industrial Districts Section 17.30.010 - Purpose and General Plan Consistency The following objectives have been formulated for the industrial districts for implementation of the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan. A. Urban Desiqn Goal: Provide a pleasant, attractive, and safe working environment. Obiectives. 1. The City shall encourage distinctive industrial development by establishing design characteristics for varying industrial activities. 2. Development standards shall provide a guide to ensure minimum design criteria throughout the industrial area. 3. Development standards shall provide the means for practical and pleasing transitions between different levels of industrial activity. Major transportation corridors shall have special design and use standards to provide differing, yet compatible, streetscape characteristics throughout the industrial area. 5. The City shall encourage high-quality architecture to ensure each project is compatible with existing developments and is a positive enhancement to the immediate area. 6. Land uses shall be organized to avoid creating nuisances among adjacent land uses. 7. The physical organization, of land uses within the industrial area shall foster the provision of alternative modes of transportation. B. Promote employment opportunities as an integral part of a balanced Land Use Goal: community. Obiectives. Encourage a mix of industrial land uses to develop a sound and diversified economic base for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and San Bernardino County. New development in the industrial area shall provide a range of employment opportunities with respect to income and skills for present as well as future residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and nearby communities. The timing, location, and intensity of development in the industrial area should be closely integrated with the overall development of the City as set forth in the General Plan. 17.30-1 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.010 .¸ Establish a specific, well..defined pattern of industrial activities, while providing flexibility to respond to future changing conditions. The development of the industrial area should accommodate the personal needs of workers and business visitors as well as the service needs of local businesses. Industrial development shall be encouraged by eliminating uncertainty and time- and money-consuming delays in the governmental processes. Public Facilities and Services Goal: Provide a method for logical and effective development of public facilities and services. Obiectives. The provision of improvements within the industrial area should seek comprehensive solutions to service and facility needs, rather than approaching these needs on an ad hoc, case-by-case basis, thereby enabling the costs of these improvements to be spread over as broad a tax base as possible. o The phasing of development shall be coordinated with the development of public improvements. When public transit and other related improvements occur within the industrial area, the opportunities for joint development with private development shall be considered to enable the public to recapture some reasonable portion of the development benefits thereby created. Promote an efficient pattern of land use and encourage the use of energy efficient modes of transportation and renewable energy resources such as solar energy, and the conservation of energy. Provide a safe and healthy environment for workers, including adequate levels of police and fire protection. Promote the use of existing railroad lines and enhance opportunities for future rail services. Require water-conserving irrigation techniques and landscape/hardscape designs for new development. Develop a toxic and hazardous materials storage and waste program in cooperation with other responsible public agencies. Circulation and Access Policies Goat: In order to ensure the effectiveness and capacity of arterials, it will be necessary to establish and enforce rigid access control policies. These controls are currently in effect under the provisions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 78-29. Objectives. 1. Non access to all arterials shall be dedicated to the City wherever suitable alternative access may be developed from local or collector streets. 17.30-2 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.010 Where access must be granted to an arterial, said access shall be limited to one point for every 300 feet of frontage or one point per parcel with less than 300 feet of frontage. It is the intent of the policy to establish a minimum 300-foot spacing between driveways. Combined access to arterials between adjacent properties shall be encouraged wherever possible to reduce the number of encroachments. Access points shall, wherever possible, be iocated a minimum of 100 feet from the back of curb returns at intersections on four-lane or wider highways. Where otherwise compatible with this policy, access shall be located opposite existing or planned points on the opposite side of the street. In addition to the controls outlined in Planning Commission Resolution No. 78-29, several additional restrictions will be necessary. Median island breaks and left turn access should be limited to approximately 1/4-mile spacings on the following major divided arterials: Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, 4th Street, and 6th Street. Table 17.30.010-A shows the recommended arterial median opening spacing which will provide adequate storage lengths for left turn lanes, signal spacing, and capacity. Signalized intersections should be spaced a minimum of 1/4-mile apart to achieve adequate two-way progression. For safety and efficiency, side friction along major arterials should be minimized. Therefore, on-street parking should be eliminated, median obstructions should be minimized, and left-turn movements and access to driveways should be confined to designated locations. Along Haven and Milliken Avenues, additional access restrictions may be required because of traffic volume constraints. 17.30-3 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.010 Table 17.30.010-A Locations of Median Left Turn Openings on Major Divided Roadways MAJOR STREET Haven Avenue Milliken Avenue Foothill Boulevard 6th Street 4th Street MEDIAN OPENING LOCATIONS Foothill Boulevard, Civic Center Drive, Arrow Route, Jersey Boulevard, 7th Street, 6th Street, Trademark Street, 4th Street. Foothill Boulevard, Day Creek Boulevard Extension, Arrow Route, Jersey Boulevard, 7th Street, 6th Street, 5th Street, 4th Street. Haven Avenue, Aspen Avenue, Spruce Avenue, Elm Avenue, Milliken Avenue, 1,200 feet east of Milliken Avenue, 1,000 feet west of Rochester Avenue, Rochester Avenue, Day Creek Boulevard, Interstate 15, Etiwanda Avenue, Cornell Avenue, East Avenue. Haven Avenue, Utica Avenue, Cleveland Avenue, 1,300 feet east of Cleveland Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Pittsburgh Avenue, 950 feet east of Pittsburgh Avenue, Buffalo Avenue, Rochester Avenue, Old Rochester Avenue/Interstate 15. Archibald Avenue, Lucas Ranch Road, Hermosa Avenue, Center Avenue, Haven Avenue, Utica Avenue, 1,300 feet west of Milliken Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Pittsburgh Avenue, Buffalo Avenue, Interstate 15. Local Street Policv- The required local street pattern should allow the maximum flexibility to each parcel owner or developer while having the least adverse impact on arterial traffic flow. The circulation pattern developed for the industrial area complies with this principle by recognizing the following: a. Streets should be provided along property lines where possible. b. Intersections with arterials should be limited to one per 1/4 mile wherever possible. Local streets should be planned to relieve traffic demand on arterials by providing parallel routes. The street pattern within a parcel should not be a part of this plan, except where necessary to meet the above criteria. 17.30-4 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.020 Section 17.30,020 - Industrial Development Districts Use of the industrial lands is organized to provide a broad range of industrial development opportunities ranging from light industrial type of accommodations to sites for heavy, rail-served industrial plants. Based on consideration of road and rail access, the relationship to surrounding non- industrial uses, City-wide plan. policies, and the parcelization pattern, land within the Industrial districts is assigned to the following major land use categories: B. C. D. E. f. Industrial Park General Industrial Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial/Rail-Served Mixed Use Open Space These districts have been created for implementation of the Goals, Objectives, and Land Use Elements of the General Plan. Industrial Park. Land is reserved for industrial firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige value. Approximately 1,095 acres have been allocated to this use. The Industrial Park designation permits light industrial uses, office and administration facilities, research and development laboratories, limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commercial service uses. The Industrial Park areas are characterized by a high employment density. The development and design standards are devel,oped to protect lands in this use group from development which is inappropriate because of function, appearance, or environmental effects. General Industrial. The General Industrial district provides for the widest possible range of light and medium industrial type activity, including: manufacturing, assembling, fabrication, wholesaling, heavy commercial, and office uses; and totals approximately 2,161 acres. This land use category is appropriate as a buffer between non-industrial uses and heavy industrial uses. In these areas, the applicable development and design standards are less demanding than those of the industrial park areas, but safeguards are provided to ensure a pleasant, well- functioning environment. The required land area per parcel is also less demanding than other industrial areas so as to accommodate smaller firms. Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial. Approximately 537 acres is reserved for Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial uses. The developmeant standards are designed to provide for heavy industrial uses which will not significantly impact the surrounding area. Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial activities include: manufacturing, compounding, processing, fabrication, warehousing, storage, and freight handling. Uses typical of this group include, but are not limited to, forge shops, steel milling facilities, plastic plants, steel fabrication, metal fabricating facilities, woodworking facilities, heavy machine shops, and chemical storage and distribution. Not permitted within the area are uses which require massive structures outside of buildings or unscreened open air storage of large quantities of raw, semi-refined, or finished products. Heavy Industrial. Approximately 675 acres of land east of the 1-15 Freeway is reserved for Heavy Industrial uses. The development standards are designed to provide for all Heavy Industrial uses. Heavy Industrial activities include: manufacturing, compounding, processing, fabrication, warehousing, storage, and freight handling. Use characteristics of this group would include large structures to facilitate processing and open air storage of large amounts of raw 17.30-5 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.020 & 17. 30. 030 or semi-refined products. Uses within this area typically include, but are not limited to: vehicular assembly plants, power plants, concrete product manufacturers, and batch plants. Mixed Use. Approximately 227 acres of land west of Milliken Avenue, between 4th Street and the Metrolink rail line, is reserved for mixed-use development. This land use category is characterized by various combinations of commercial, office, recreation, and industrial activities within an integrated development project. Open Space. Approximately 150 acres of land west of Milliken Avenue between 4th Street and the Metrolink rail line, is reserved for open space. This land use category is characterized by natural or man-made open space which creates an attractive and pleasant environment for surrounding businesses. Uses within this area typically include golf courses, outdoor recreation areas, and parks. Section 17.30.030 - Use Regulations Uses listed in Table 17.30.030-A shall be allowable in one or more of the industrial districts as indicated in~ the columns beneath each industrial district subarea. Where indicated with the letter "P," the use shall be a Permitted use in that district. Where indicated with the letter "C," the use shall be a Conditionally Permitted use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. There are many possible land use types within the Industrial Districts. Each subarea has a certain set of land use types based upon its land use category and surrounding conditions. Table 17.30.030-A lists the land use types by subarea. Definitions of these land uses are described in Section 17.03.030.D. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses are those land uses allowed in a given subarea subject to the development regulations of the Plan. ConditionalIv Permitted Uses. Conditionally Permitted uses, because of their unusual site development requirements or unique operating characteristics, are subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission or City Planner. Projects requiring a Conditional Use Permit shall be required to comply with the regulations of Section 17.04.030. Interim Uses. The following Interim uses shall be permitted, provided that such uses and their locations shall not preclude full development in accordance with the development regulations of the District and no permanent buildings are constructed: agricultural uses, including roadside stands, and private parks and piicnic areas. Parking and storage areas, park-and-ride lots, and other uses similar in character shall be permitted subject to a Conditional Use Permit and to standards contained in Section 17.30.040.G. A Conditional Use Permit shall be approved for a two-year period. Extensions may be granted up to an additional three years for a maximum time limit not to extend more than five years beyond the original date of approval. As a condition of approval, an agreement between the City and applicant shall be completed stipulating timing, installation of permanent improvements and buildings, and/or restoration of the site to its original condition. At the end of five years, the use shall be removed or the site developed in accordance with full development regulations of the Plan. 17.30-6 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.030 Table 17.30.030-A - Use Regulations for Industrial Districts SUMMARY OF LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA USETYPES LAND USE IP GI GI GI GI GI IP IP GI MI/HI GI GI IP GI GI HI IP IP MU/OS SUBAREAS HO It 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MANUFACT1JRING Custom Light Medium Heavy Minimum Impact Heavy OFFICE PROFESSIONAL~ DIE~IGIN & RESEARCH Administrative & Office Professional/Design Services Research Services WHOLESALE, STORAGE~ & DISTRIBUTION Public Storage Light Medium Heavy MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITIES Collection Facilities Processing Facilities Scrap Operation CiViC Administrative Civic Services Convention Centers Cultural Day Care Facility Extensive Impact Utility Facilities Flood Control/Utility Corridor Public Assembly Public Safety & Utility Services Religious Assembly Schools P P P P P P P P P P P P P C P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C P CCC P C P PP PPP P P P PP PP PPP CPCC PP PP PPP CPCC P P P P P P P P P P P P P C C P C C P P P P P P P P P C P P C P P C C CC CP P PPPPPPPP P PP PPP P C P PPPPP P P PP PPP C C C CC CCC C P P P P o PP PP PPP PPPP PP CC C P C CP C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C CC CC P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P CC CC CCC CCCC CC C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C CC CC CCC CCCC CC C ~ C C C C C C C C C C C C C C NOTES: IP - Industrial Park HO - Haven Avenue Overlay District GI - General Industrial MI/HI - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial HI - Heavy Industrial P - Permitted Use C - Conditionally Permitted Use ~j - Non-Marked Uses not permitted A - Adult Entertainment Zoning Permit Required MU/OS - Mixed Use/Open Space 17.30-7 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.030 Table 17.30.030-A Continued - Use Regulations for Industrial Districts USE TYPES COMMERCIAL Adult Entertainment Agricultural/Nursery Supplies & Services Animal Care Automotive Fleet Storage Automotive Rental Automotive/Light Track Repair - Minor Automotive/Truck Repair - Major Automotive Sales and Leasing Automotive Service Court Automotive Serviae Station Building Contractor's Office & Yards Building Contractor's Storage Yard Building Maintenance Services Building & Light Equipment Su};~olies & Sales Business Supply Retail & Services Business Support Services Communication Services Convenience Sales & Services Entertainment Extensive Impact Commercial Fast Food Sales Financial, Insurance & Real Estate Services Food & Beverage Sales Funeral & Crematory Services Heavy Equipment Sales & Rentals Hotel/Motel Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial Laundry Services Medical/Health Care Services Personal Services Petroleum Products Storage Recreation Facilities Repair Services Restaurants Restaurants with Bar or Entertainment Specialty Building Supplies & Home Improvement Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandising ** SUBAREAS 181 9 I 17 18 1121131141151161 PPP P CCC C C C P PP PPPPP PCP P PPPP CCCC PPPPP P PP PPP PCPCC P P*P PP PPP P* P C P P C P P P PPPPPPPPP C*CCPP C C C* C P P P P C*C C C C ¢ C C P P P P P P P C* C P P c c P P C P P P P P P P C C C C C P P C AAA A AAAAAA P PP P C CC CC C P CC P PP PP PP P P PP P P CCC CC C CP P PP CCC CCCC C P PP PPP ~ P P ~ P P P P P P ~ P CP CCP P P P P P P W C P P P P P P ~ PPPPP PP ~ CC CC CC ~ CCC CC C ~ C CCC ~ CCC CC C ~ PPP CPCC PP O C C C C C C ~ C ~ C C P CC CCP m PP P C ~ C C CC CCC P P PP PP PPP PPPP' P PPP CP PP C C C CC C CCCCCP CCP PP P P PP PPC PP P CC C NOTES: IP - Industrial Park HO - Haven Avenue Overlay District GI - General Industrial MI/HI - Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial HI Heavy Industrial * Refer to Haven Avenue Overlay District for additional restrictions ** Refer to Subarea 12 Special Considerations for additional restrictions P - Permitted Use C - Conditionally Permitted Use [] - Non-Marked uses not permitted A - Adult Entertainment Zoning Permit Required MU/OS - Mixed Use/Open Space 17.30-8 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.030 FIGURE 17.30.030-A DAY CR[~KK MILLIKF21 TURNIgR ARCHIBALD HELLMAN 17.30-9 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.030 ..... D. Land Use Type Definitions. Uses shown in Table 17.30.030-A are defined as follows: 1. Manufacturing Use Types. Custom Manufacturing: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment, or fabrication of custom made products. These types of business establishments do not utilize raw materials for their finished products, but rather, may utilize "semi-finished" type of manufactured materials for their custom made-to-order products. The finished products from these business establishments are ready for use or consumption and may include on-site wholesale and retail of the goods produced. Such uses may include, but are not limited to: jewelry; household furniture; art objects; apparel products; small instruments (musical, electrical, or photographic); stationary, and related products; signs and advertising displays; stained glass products; leather products; and assembly of bicycle parts. The uses do not produce odors, noise, vibration, or particulates which would adversely affect uses in the same structure or on a same site. Where 24-hour, on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Light Manufacturing: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: labor intensive manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, or repair processes which do not involve large container truck traffic or the transport of targe scale bulky products, but may include limited rail traffic. The new product may be finished in the sense that it is ready for use or consumption or it may be semi-finished to become a component for further assembly and packaging. These types of business establishments are customarily directed to the wholesale market, inter-plant transfer, rather than d~irect sale to the consumer. Such uses may include, but are not limited to: electronic microchip assembly; printing, publishing, and allied industries; candy and other confectionery products; bottled or canned soft drinks and carbonated water; apparel and other finished products; paper board containers and boxes; drugs; small fabricated metal products such as hand tools, general hardware, architectural, and ornamental metal work and toys, amusement, sports, and athletics goods. The activities do not produce odors, noise, vibration, hazardous waste materials, or particulates which would adversely affect other uses in the structure or on the same site. Where 24-hour, on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Medium Manufacturing: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: manufacturing, compounding of materials, processing, assembly, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require frequent large container truck traffic or rail traffic, or the transport of heavy, bulky items. The new products are semi-finished to be a component for further manufacturing, fabrication, and assembly. These types of business establishments are customarily directed to inter-plant transfer or to order from industrial uses, rather than for direct sale to the domestic consumer. Such uses may include, but are not limited to: canned food; textile products; furniture and fixtures; converted paper and paper board products; plastic products made from purchased rubber, plastic, or resin; fabricated metal products made from sheet metal; electrical and electronic machinery, equipments and supplies; and office, computing, and accounting machines. These activities may produce noise, odors, vibrations, illumination, or particulates that affect the persons residing in or conducting business in the vicinity. 17.30-10 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.030 Where 24-hour, on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Heavy Manufacturing: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: manufacturing, compounding of material, processing, assembly, packaging, treatment, or fabrication. Activities in this area may have frequent rail or truck traffic and the transportation of heavy, large-scale products. Activities in this area may generate noise, odor, vibration, illumination, or particulates which may be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing in or conducting business in the vicinity. Characteristics of activities permitted within this area may include massive structures outside of buildings such as cranes, conveyor systems, cooling towers, or unscreened open air storage of large quantities of raw, semi-refined, or finished products. Uses typi;cally include, but are not limited to: vehicular assembly plants, power plants, concrete product manufacturing activities, batch plants, scrap yards, air melting foundries, and aggregate or asphalt yards. Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Minimum Impact Heaw Manufacturing: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: manufacturing, compounding of material, processing, assembly, packaging, treatment, or fabrication activities which may have frequent rail or truck traffic or the transportation of heavy, large-scale products. Activities in this area may generate noise, odor, vibration, illumination, or particulates which may be obnoxious or offensive to persons residing or conducting business in the vicinity. Uses typically utilize raw materials to fabricate semi-finished products which include, but are not limited to: forge shops, metal fabricating facilities, open welding shops, lumber woodworking: facilities, heavy machine shops, chemical storage and distributing, plastic plants, and ~ight or vacuum casting facilities. Not permitted within this area are uses which require massive structures outside of buildings such as cranes or conveyor systems or unscreened open air storage of large quantities of raw, semi-refined, or finished products. Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. 2. Office, Professional, Design. and Research Use Tvpes. Administrative and Office: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: executive management, administrative, or clerical uses of private, profit-orientated firms other than public utility firms. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: corporate headquarters, branch offices, and data storage centers. Professional and Design Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the provision of advice, design, information, or consultation of a professional nature. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: architects, engineers, lawyers, accountant, and advertising offices, and a planning or educational research service. Research Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: research, design, analysis, development, and/or testing of a product. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: testing laboratories, acoustical chambers, wind tunnels, and main frame computer services. Such uses do not promote odors, noise, vibration, 17,30-11 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.030 or particulates which would adversely affect uses in the same structure or on the same site. 3. Wholesale, Storage and Distribution Use Types. Public StoraGe: Activities include mini-warehouse or recreational vehicle storage facilities for the rental or lease of small-scale, enclosed storage units or parking spaces primarily to individuals rather than firms or organizations. Activities to store household items, other than storage operations, are not allowed on the premises. Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Light Wholesale, Storaqe and Distribution: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: wholesaling, storage, and warehousing services and storage and wholesale to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy 50,000 square feet or less of building space. Retail sales from the premises may occur when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Where 24- hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Medium Wholesale, Storape and Distribution: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: wholesale, storage, and warehousing services; moving and storage services; storage and who~lesaling to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products; and distribution facilities for large-scale retail firms. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy greater than 50,000 square feet of building space. Included are multi-tenant or speculative buildings with, over 50,000 square feet of warehouse space. Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Heavy Wholesale, Storage and Distribution: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: warehousing; storage; freight handling; shipping; trucking services and terminals; and storage and wholesaling from the premises of unfinished, raw, or semi-refined products requiring further processing, fabrication or manufacturing. Typically uses include, but are not limited to: trucking firms, automotive storage or impound yards, and the wholesaling of metals, minerals, and agricultural products. Outdoor storage is permitted. Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. 4. Commercial Use Types. Adult Entertainment: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: adult entertainment establishments as defined by the Development Code. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: adult book stores, adult motion picture establishments, adult mini-motion picture theaters, adult motion picture arcades, adult drive-in theaters, adult cabarets, adult motels or hotels, adult theaters, adult model studios, sexual encounter establishments, and body painting studios. Agricultural/NurserY Su13131ies and Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the retail sale from the premises of feed and grain, fertilizers, pesticides, 17.30-12 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.030 herbicides, and similar goods. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: feed and grain stores, well drilling, tree service firms, and nurseries. Animal Care: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the provision of animal care treatment and boarding services of large and small animals. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: animal clinics, large and small animal hospitals, and kennels. Automotive Fleet Storage:: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the storage of vehicles used regularly in business operations and not available for sale on site. Such uses typically include, but are not limited to: overnight storage of service vehicles, mobile catering trucks, and taxi cabs. Automotive Rental: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the rental from the premises of motor vehicles, with provision for incidental maintenance services. Uses typically include, but are not limited to, car rental agencies. On-site storage shall not occupy more than 25 percent of the required parking for the subject building suite, unless approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Automotive and Liqht Truck Repair - Minor: Activities include, but are not limited to: automotive and light truck repair, the retail sale of goods and services for automotive vehicles and ~ight trucks (less than 6,000 pounds), and the cleaning and washing of automotive vehicles. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: brake, muffler, and tire shops and automotive drive-through car washes. Heavier automobile repair such. as transmission and engine repair are not included. Disabled vehicles shall be screened from public view. Automotive and Truck Repair- Maior: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: heavy automobile and truck repair such as transmission and engine repair, the painting of automotive vehicles, automotive body work, and the installation of major accessories. Disabled vehicles shall be screened from public view. Automotive Sales and Leasinq: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the display, sale, or leasing of new and used automobiles, trucks, and recreational vehicles; minor automotive repair; and installation of accessories. Uses typically include car dealerships with service departments. Automotive Service Court: An integrated cluster of related automotive service activities which typically include: gas stations; service stations, with or without ancillary uses such as car washes and food marts; general automotive service and repair including mufflers, shocks, alignments, brakes, oil changes, lubrications, tune-ups, smog checks, tire repair and replacement, and transmissions; installation of air conditioning, car phones, stereos, windshields, and upholstery; windshield tinting; sale of auto [)arts; and other related services. Auto Courts shall comply with the following design criteria: (1) Maximum size: 6 acres. (2) Maximum frontage along a major or secondary arterial street: 300 feet. (3) No access to the site will be permitted directly off any major arterial. 17.30-13 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code' Section 17.30.030 (4) An appropriate combination of berms, landscaping, and architectural elements shall be provided around the entire perimeter of the site to minimize the impact of the auto court use from the existing and future surrounding USES. (5) Outdoor storage of inoperative vehicles, parts, or equipment is prohibited. (6) All work shall be conducted indoors. (7) All signage shall be limited to signs approved under a Uniform Sign Program. (8) Master planning shall be required. (9) A minimum of 15 percent of the net lot area shall be landscaped. (10) Pedestrian facilities, such as plazas or courtyards with appropriate street furniture, shall be p,rovided. (11) Service bays and pump islands shall be oriented away from street frontages. Service bays and pump islands, subject to public view and view from adjoining properties, shall be screened through a combination of berms, landscaping, low decorative walls, building orientation, and architectural elements. (12) Building design shall have 360-degree architectural treatment. Building entrances shall be well articulated and project an entrance statement. Automotive Service Station: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the sale from the premises of goods and the provision of service normally required in the day-to-day operation of motor vehicles, including the principal sale of petroleum products; the incidental sale of tires, batteries, and replacement items; and the performance of minor repairs, such as tune-up, tire change, lubricating services, and brake work. ko Building Contractor's Offices and Yards: Activities typically include the offices and storage of equipment, materials, and vehicles for contractors who are in the trades involving construction activities which include, but are not limited to, plumbing, painting, electrical, roofing, carpentry, and other services. Screening of outdoor storage is required as per Section 17.26.040.A.6 (Storage Area/Screening). Building Contractor's Storeqe Yard: Activities include the maintenance and outdoor storage of large construction equipment such as earthmoving equipment and cranes and the outdoor storage of building materials in an unscreened manner. Buildin(~ Maintenance Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: maintenance and c:ustodial services, window cleaning services, disinfecting and exterminating services, and janitorial services. Small operation contractors may be included in this category provided that the contractor has no outdoor storage of any materials or equipment, no inoperable vehicles or non-motorized trailers, nor any vehicles in excess of 84 inches in width or 6,000 pounds in gross weight. 17.30-14 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.030 Building and Liqht Eauipment Supplies and Sales: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the retail sale or rental from the premises of goods and equipment including paint, glass, hardware, fixtures, electrical supplies, rote-tillers, syhll trailers, lumber, and hardware and may have outdoor storage where allowed. Business SUDDIv Retail and Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retail sales, rental or repair from the premises of office equipment, office supplies, and similar office goods primarily to firms and other organizations utilizing the goods rather than to individuals. They exclude the sale of materials used in the construction of buildings or other structures. Business SuDport Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: services which support the activity of firms such as, clerical; employment; protective; or minor processing, including blueprint services and the multiple copying of pamphlets and small reports for other firms. Activities not included in this category are the printing of books and services of a personal nature. Community Commercial Retail Business: Within an approved Community Commercial Center which extends an Activity Center, this category adds uses to the retail uses already permitted within the Subarea in which the Center is situated. Uses shall be consistent with the Community Commercial Retail Business uses permitted in the Terra Vista Community Plan which are incorporated herein by reference. The intent is to encourage a mix of uses which can make a Center lively well into the night, to function as an active people place, and to serve not only the residents of the City but, by location, also draw from residential areas in neighboring communities. Communication Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: broadcasting and other information relay services accomplished primarily through use of electronic and telephonic mechanisms. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: television and radio studios and telegraph offices. Convenience Sales and Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, the retail sales from the premises of frequently needed/used small personal convenience items and professional services. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: drug stores; stores selling toiietries, tobacco, and magazines; beauty and barber shops; and apparel laundering and dry cleaning agencies. Entertainment: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, entertainment services, excluding adult entertainment, within an enclosed building to assembled groups of spectators or participants, as well as activities typically performed at private and non-profit clubs and lodges. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: dance halls, motion picture theaters, and meeting halls. Extensive Impact Commercial: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: those which produce or may produce a substantial impact upon the surrounding area. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: outdoor swap meets, amusement parks, and drive-in movie theaters. Fast Food Sales: Activities shall include the retail sale from the premises of quickly prepared foods and beverages such as hot or cold sandwiches, chicken, tacos, pizza, donuts, etc., served with dispensable (paper/plastic) plates and utensils for 17.30-15 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.030 on- or off-site consumption. Table service is generally limited to delivery of counter-ordered meals and busing. Service to persons in vehicles can be a function of fast food establishments. Financial, Insurance, and Real Estate Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, financial, insurance, real estate, and securities brokerage services and banks. Food and Beveraqe Sales: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, the retail sale from the premises of food and beverages for off-premises consumption. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: mini-markets, liquor stores, retail bakeries, and catering businesses and they exclude chain-type grocery stores. Funeral and Crematory Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, services involving the care, preparation, and disposition of human dead other than in cemeteries. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: funeral homes, crematories, and mausoleums. aa~ Hotel/Motel: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, lodging services to transient guests on a less-than-monthly basis, other than in the case of uses classified as residential uses. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: hotels, motels, boarding houses, and resorts. Heavy Ecluil~ment Sales and Rentals: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the sale or rental from the premises of heavy construction equipment, farm equipment, trucks, and aircraft together with maintenance. Uses typically include, but are not limited 1Io: aircraft, farm equipment, heavy truck, large boat (over 25 feet), and heavy constructi,on equipment dealers. bb. dd. IndoorWholesale/Retail Cpmmercial: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, retail, wholesale, or discount sales. These types of businesses exclusively involve multiple vendors selling new goods in separate, permanent display structures. Uses typically include, but are not limited to, discount outlets and indoor swap meets. Laundry Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: institutional or commercial linen supply and laundry services, dry cleaning plants, rug cleaning, and diaper laundry services. Medical/Health Care Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: therapeutic, preventative, or correctional personal treatment by physicians, dentists, and other practitioners, as well as the provision for medical testing and analysis services. Health care uses typically include those pealerreed by: (1) Medical clinics; ee. (2) Family planning clinics; and (3) In-patient health care facilities including hospitals and convalescent homes. Personal Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: information, instruction, and similar services of a personal nature. Uses typically include, but 17.30-16 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 30.030 are not limited to: computer training and driving schools, day care facilities, travel bureaus, and photography studios. ff. Petroleum Products Storaqe: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: bulk storage, sale, and distribution of gasoline, liquefied petroleum gas, and other petroleum products. gg~ Recreational Facilities: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, sports performed either indoors or outdoors which require a facility for conducting the recreational activity. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: health clubs, exercise studios or classes, swimming centers, skating rinks, bowling alleys, tennis courts, sports fields, and golf courses. hh. Repair Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, repair services involving articles such as upholstery, furniture, and large electrical appliances. ii. Restaurants: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retail sale, from the premises, of unpackaged food or beverages generally prepared for on-premise consumption. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: restaurants with incidental serving of beer and wine, cafeterias, and delicatessens; and they exclude fast food type of services, cocktail lounges, bars, entertainment, and dancing. jj. Restaurants with Bar or Entertainment: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the retail sale, from the premises, of unpackaged food or beverages, including hard ~iquor, generally prepared for on-premise consumption. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: restaurants with hard liquor sales, dancing, or entertainment; cocktail lounges; and bars. kk. SDecialW Buildinq SuDI31ies and Home Improvements: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: retail and wholesale sales and installation of specialty items, such as paint; wall/floor/window coverings; doors and windows; building materials; hardware, plumbing and el.ectrical supplies; bath and kitchen fixtures and supplies; lighting; swimming pools and supplies; and garden furnishings, materials and supplies. Activities shall be conducted in enclosed buildings of 25,000 square feet or less. Uses excluded from this category are general merchandise stores. II. Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandisinq Business: Within an approved Warehouse- Style Retail Merchandising Center, this category adds to the retail uses already permitted for the Subarea. in which the Center is situated. Retail uses shall be added which are consistent with General Commercial Uses within the General Commercial District of Section 17.10.030. In the event of a conflict between whether a use is permitted or conditionally permitted, the Subarea requirement applies. Light Wholesale, Storage and Distribution is already a permitted use. The intent is to emphasize and expand retail uses in conjunction with warehouse use in Subarea 12 which is transitional between industrial and retail commercial land use areas. 5. Civic Use Tvpes. Administrative Civic Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: management, administrative, or clerical services performed by public, quasi-public, and public utility administrative offices. 17.30-17 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.030 Convention Centers: Activities typically include, but ara not limited to: conferences, seminars, product demonstrations, and tournaments within an enclosed building for assembled groups, spectators, or participants. Uses typically include convention centers and exhibition halls. Cultural: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, those performed by or at the following institutions or installations: (1) Public and private performing arts centers (i.e., music, dance, drama) not including nightclubs; (2) Public and private museums and art galleries; and (3) Public and private libraries and observatories. Day Care Facility: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: establishments for non-medical care to infants, preschool, and school-age childran under 18 years of age during a portion of the day. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: infant centers, nursery schools, pre-schools, and similar facilities. eo Extensive Impact Utilitv Facilities: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, those performed by public agencies or groups which are strongly vested in the public interest and which produce or may produce a substantial impact upon the surrounding area. Uses typically include, but are not limited to the following institutions and installations: (1) Electric, gas, and oil transmission facilities; (2) Garbage or refuse disposal facilities; (3) Major mail-processing centers; (4) Radio and television transmission facilities, including but not limited to, booster or relay stations; (5) Railroad and bus terminals; (6) Railroad rights-of-way, railroad yards, and bus storage areas; (7) Public utility corporation or truck yards; (8) Reservoirs, water tanks, and water treatment facilities; (9) Sewage treatment facilities and truck lines exclusive of individual septic tanks; (10) Steam, fossil,~ or nuclear power plants; and (11) Truck terminals operated by a public agency. 17.30-18 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.030 f. Flood Control/Utility Corridor: Activities typically include flood control channels and major utility corridors, such as high power electrical transmission lines and towers. Other activities which are compatible with both the utility function and surrounding existing or future land uses may be permitted in utility corridors, as provided for by the regulations con,tained in Chapter 17.16 (Open Space Districts) of the City's Development Code. g. Public Assemblv: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, those performed by, or at, the following institutions or installations: (1) Parks, botanical gardens, and open space areas of a passive use character; (2) Public and semi-public playgrounds and playing field, and open space areas of an active use character; and (3) Public and semi-public meeting halls. h. Public Safety and Utili~ Services: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, the maintenance and operation of the following installations: (1) Communications equipment installations and exchanges, except telephone exchange and switching facilities; (2) Electrical substations; (3) Gas substations; (4) Ambulance services.; (5) Police stations and fire stations; (6) Post offices, excluding major mail-processing centers; and, (7) Publicly operated off-street parking lots and garages available to the general public either without charge or on a fee basis. i. Reliqious Assemblv: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, those performed at churches, temples, synagogues, and other places of worship. j. Schools: Activities typically include, but are not limited to, public and private educational institutions. Uses typically include, but are not limited to: vocational or business trade schools, colleges, and universities. General Use TvDes. a. Accessory/Ancillary Use: ']'he use customarily incidental and/or accessory to the principal use of the land, building site, business activity, or to a building or other structure located on the same building site as the principal use. An accessory use which is customari~y subordinate in function and in area requirements to the principal use or building site may also serve an ancillary function as an integral, essential, and inseparable part of the principal use, building site, structure, or portion thereof. 17.30-19 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.030 & 17.30. 040 Principal Use: A use which fulfills a primary function of an establishment, business, institution, or other entity. A principle use occupies the largest single segment of the activity, functions, or area requirements of a development. Research and Development Uses. The Industrial districts provide for activities of research and development projects by authorizing specific activities/uses typically associated with that type of operation. Those activities are listed and defined under Office, Professional, Design, and Research Use Types. Research and development projects are appropriate for those subareas in which the combination of the three individual office uses may be authorized. For research and development projects on Haven Avenue, refer to the Haven Avenue Overlay District provisions for Professional Service uses and accessory use allowances. 7. Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs). Collection Facility: Activities typically include the acceptance by donation, redemption, or purchase of recyclable materials from the public for sorting and storage. Such a facility may involve aggregating, weighing, and storing large amounts of material on-site, including bailing, compacting, or similar packaging operations for shipment. Outdoor storage may be permitted when approved by a Conditional Use Permit. Processincj Facility: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: weighing, heating, melting, crushing, grinding, briquetting, mechanical sorting, shredding, stripping, cleaning, and remanufacturing. The finished materials are semi-finished or raw materials to be shipped for further manufacture or assembly. Such a facility may involve outdoor storage of large amounts of recyclable or processed materials. Scrap Operation: Activities typically include, but are not limited to: the storage and sale from the premises and/or dismantling of used, recyclable, or waste materials, except when such activities are part of a manufacturing operation. Section 17.30.040 - Site Development Criteria The Development Standards within the Industrial area address the following factors: A. General Provisions B. Master Plan Requirements C. Minimum Parcel Size D. Setback Requirements E. Landscape Requirements F. Rail Service Standards G. Performance Standards H. Interim Uses I. Materials Recovery Facilities Standards J. Indoor Wholesale/Retail Commercial Criteria Table 17.30.040-A summarizes the application of development standards which may apply on a subarea basis, including minimum parcel size, landscape requirements, performance requirements, and rail service standards. The setback requirements are determined in accordance with the street classification. 17.30-20 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 Table 17.30.040-A- Development Standards Summary Standards HO 1 2 3 4, 5 6' 7~ 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Minimum Parcel Size 2 ~ I Y2 ~: 1 2/1 2/1 Y2 5/2 I ~ 2/1 ~ ~ 5 1 Y~ *** (Acres) Minimum % of Landscaped Area (1% of Net Lot Area) 25/30 12 10 12 12 7 15 15 12 10/5 10 12 15 12 12 10/5 15 15 Performance Schedule A B B B El [] A A [] B/C [] [] A B [] C A A Rail Service** X X X X X X X x X X *** * May be subject to Haven Avenue Overlay District regulations. ** Properties adjacent to rail spurs subject to rail service development standards of Section 17. 30.040. F. *** Refer to Subarea 18 Specific Plan. General Provisions. The purpose of standards within General Provisions is to establish minimum standards regulating specific details in the development of any project within the Industrial districts. The standards set forth in this section shall apply either within the entire Industrial area or where stated by the land use category. Condition of Uses. All business and manufacturing operations shall be conducted within an enclosed building unless specifically permitted and adequately screened from public view pursuant to this Section. Sig~ns. Signs shall be used for the purposes of identification and direction. The design of permitted signs shall be architecturally integrated with the building design. Submittal of preliminary design concepts during the development review process is encouraged. The design of signs, including location, materials, colors, copy, size, and construction details, are all set forth in the City's Sign Ordinance (Chapter 14 of the Municipal Code). Uniform Sian Program. A coordinated Uniform Sign Program may be required for any development, including wall and monument signs, to encourage design compatibility. Liclhting. Lighting shall be used for the purpose of providing illumination for the security and safety of on-site areas such as parking, loading, shipping and receiving, pathways, and working areas. The following standards shall apply in all areas. The design of light fixtures, and their structural support, shall be architecturally compatible with the surrounding buildings. Free-standing light standards shall not exceed 25 feet or the height of the shortest on-site building. Security lighting fixtures are not to project above the fascia or roof line of the building. All lighting is to be shielded to confine the light spread to within the site's boundaries. Particular concern shall be for lighting adjacent to residential areas. 17..30-21 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 EauiDment Screenina. The purpose of Equipment Screening Standards shall be to allow for the use of equipment while preserving the architectural character and integrity of the surrounding environment. Equipment is deemed to include exterior mechanical or electrical equipment, such as air conditioning units, fans, ductwork, cyclone blowers, cranes, and storage tanks. The following standards shall apply according to land use category: All roof-, wall-, and ground-mounted equipment shall be screened from all sides within all land use categories except Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial and Heavy Industrial. Wherever possible, all roof-, wall-, and ground-mounted equipment shall be screened on all sides wit~hin the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial and Heavy Industrial categories. All screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and where possible a roof parapet wall shall be used to screen roof- or wall-mounted equipment. Where roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork projects vertically more than 1 ~'2 feet above the roof or roof parapet, it shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Where roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork projects 1 ~ feet or less above the roof or roof parapet it shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Storacje Area/Screenin~j. The purpose of Storage Area/Screening Regulations is to allow for on-site storage which is screened from view from the public right-of-way and from land used in common (public view) and is architecturally compatible with the surrounding environment. The following standards shall apply according to land use category: Industrial Park category - No outdoor storage shall be permitted except for fleet vehicles and light trucks (not exceeding 6,000 pounds). Outdoor storage tanks may be permitted at a height not to exceed 8 feet from highest finished grade when screened from public view by concrete, masonry, or other similar materials. General Industrial or General Industrial/Rail Served categories - All materials, supplies, equipment, and operating trucks shall be stored within an enclosed building or area screened from public view. Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial and Heavy Industrial categories - All materials, supplies, equipment, and operating trucks shall be stored within an enclosed building or storage area. Such storage areas within 120 feet of a street frontage shall be screened. LANDSCAPING BARRtEIt~ FREEWAY nOW 17.30-22 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 Within 600 feet of the 1-15 Freeway right-of-way, all outdoor storage shall be screened from public view from the 1-15 Freeway. Screening from the 1-15 Freeway may consider the use or combination of block or masonry walls, berming, dense landscaping,. or building mass, as illustrated below. /SOLID WALL SCREENING FREEWAY ROW X ~ ~ ~' STO#AGE AREA * .~~.~rk~ ..... ~ ............:._._.~.~ Within all land use categories except Heavy Industrial, all storage area screening shall be architecturally integrated with surrounding buildings by the use of concrete, masonry, or other similar materials not to exceed a height of 8 feet from highest finished grade. BUILDING AS BARRIER% LOC~AL STI~EET ~ FREEWAY ROW ~ ~ 81'ORAGE AREA Within the Heavy Industrial category, storage area screening may include masonry or concrete, wood, metal, or chain link with wood slats. Storage of materials or equipment shall not exceed screen height within 100 feet of street-fronting screens. The City Planner may waive screening requirements where future building expansion would screen an abutting storage area. Security Fences and Walls. The purpose of Security Fencing and Wall Standards is to provide for a safe environment for businesses within the Industrial area. Site planning, including building configuration and placement, is encouraged to create defined areas that may be adequately secured. Any wall or fence along a street frontage over 3 feet in height is subject to the streetscape setback requirements established in Section D (Setback Requirements) of this chapter. Within all land use categories except Heavy Industrial, all fencing or walls shall be wrought iron, concrete, masonry, or other similar materials not to exceed a height of 8 feet from highest finished grade. The use of barbed wire or similar materials is prohibited from these land use categories. Chain link may be used in areas not visible in front setback area. 17.30-23 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 do Within the Heavy Industrial category, security fencing may include wrought iron, masonry or concrete, wood, metal, or chain link with wood slats. Barbed wire may be permitted atop fencing. Security gates are subject to review and approval by the Fire and Sheriff Departments to ensure adequate emergency access. Utilities. The purpose of Utility Service Standards is for the efficient distribution of utilities designed to be compatible with the surrounding environment. The following requirements shall apply within the Industrial area: All existing and new utilities, 12 KV and less, within the project and along adjacent major arterials shall be installed underground. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances, such as transformers, shall be located out of public view, preferably in the side yard, and adequately screened through the use or combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and landscape materials. Maintenance. Property owners are responsible for the maintenance of all buildings, structures, yards, landscaping, signs, parking areas, and other improvements in a manner which does not detract from the appearance of the surrounding area. The following conditions are prohibited: Dilapidated, deteriorating, or unrepaired structures such as roofs, walls, windows, doors, fences, signs, or similar items. b. Scrap lumber, junk, trash, or debris. Abandoned, discarded, or unused objects or equipment, such as vehicles, machine parts, pallets, steel drums, boxes, scrap metal, waste materials, or similar items. d. Stagnant water. Any device, decoration, design, structure, or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy, growing condition and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. Master Plan Recluirements. The purpose of Master Plan Requirements is to provide for integrated development throughout the Industrial area at the earliest possible time in the review process. Master planning of defined areas will avoid development in a manner which would prevent or preclude future development of surrounding land on the same or adjoining parcels in the best way possible. It is not the intention of the master planning process to "cast future development patterns in stone." The intent is to recognize and solve problems before they occur and take advantage of opportunities while they exist. A Conceptual Master Plan~ shall be required for City Planner and/or Planning Commission review in conjunction with development proposals whenever necessary to assure 17.30-24 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 Go integrated development, enhance harmonious and orderly development, mitigate site constraints on the same or adjoining parcels, and maximize land potential. The area of Master Plans shall not be confined by individual lot lines, but determined by logical planning boundaries and site conditions as required by the City Planner. At a minimum, Master Plans shall address harmonious site plan relationships and the potential for shared access and reciprocal parking by illustrating conceptual building pad locations, circulation and parking ~ot configurations, and conceptual grading and drainage. Future development may be allowed to vary from the Master Plan, provided the proposed project is compatible with the intent of the Master Plan and satisfies all development requirements within the Land Use category. Minimum Parcel Size. The purpose of a Minimum Parcel Size is to establish minimum lot size standards which will provide for the development and use of land within the Industrial area according to the land use category and development standards. The Minimum Parcel Size is determined by the land use category with the exception of portions of Subareas 6, 7, and 12. Lot Size. The Minimum Parcel Size shall be set forth as follows: Minimum Parcel Land Use Cateaorv Size (Acres) a. Industrial Park 1 or 2 * b. General Industrial 1/2 c. General Industrial Rail Served 1 d. Minimum Impact Heavy industrial 5 or 2 ** e. Heavy Industrial 5 2-acre minimum parcel size in Subareas 6, 7, and 12 on parcels adjacent to 4~ Street, Haven A venue, and Foothill Boulevard. Also, specialstandards for Master Planning and urban centers apply within the Haven Avenue Overlay District. ** 2-acre minimum parcel size in Subarea 9 between Arrow Route and 1,000 feet south. Lot Width. Minimum Parcel Width shall be not less than 100 feet and not less than 300 feet on parcels abutting Special Boulevards as shown in Figure 17.30.040-A. 3. Condominium Lots. Condominium lots and lots within an approved Master Planned Development are exempt from required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements. All lots of record are allowed to develop according to development standards as set forth in this plan. Setback Requirements. The purpose of Setback Requirements is to provide open space for building separation, landscape treatment, and the encouragement of architectural and site planning design diversity. The following standards shall apply in all subareas: 17.30-25 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 .... Definition. Streetscape setbacks include the minimum building setback, minimum parking setback, and the average depth of landscaping along public and private street frontages. All streetscape setbacks are determined from the ultimate face of curb. Streetscape Setback. Streetscape setback requirements shall be established according to street classification as shown in Table 17.30.040-B and as shown in Figure 17.30.040-B Streetscape Setback Schedule, except as provided for in Sections D.3 through D.6 below. Table 17.30.040-B Streetscape Setback Requirements (As determined from the ultimate face-of-curb) Major Arterial & Special Boulevard Secondary Local Average Depth Building Parking of Landscape* Setback** Setback*** 45 feet 45 feet 25 feet 35 feet 35 feet 20 feet 25 feet 25 feet 15 feet * The average depth shall be uninterrupted from the face of curb, except for sidewalks, pedestrian hardscape, plazas and courtyards, and monument signs. ** Street frontage walls and fences over 3 feet in height are subject to building setbacks. *** Average depth of landscaping must still be provided, see 3. Building Setback. Building setbacks shall be as follows (except when modified as set forth in Items D.3 through D.6). a. Front: As shown per street classification in Table 17.30.040-B. b. Interior Rear: None, except when rear lot area abuts a side street, the setback shall be 5 feet minimum. 17.30-26 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 Rear Abuttincl Street: As shown per street classification. Interior Side: 5-foot minimum. Minimum side yard setback may be waived or modified by the Planning Commission subject to Master Plan application and approval. Street Side: As shown per the street classification in Table 17.30.040-B. 17.30-27 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code FIGURE 17.30.040-A Section 17.30.040 ;I !i] o 0 0 "'V :/ 17.30-28 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code FIGURE 17.30.040-B STREETSCAPE SETBACK SCHEDULE Section 17.30.040 MAJOR ARTERIAL/SPECIAL BLVD., (100-* and 120-foot ROW) · Day Creek Bloulevard · Foothill Boulevard e Haven Avenue · Miltiken Avenue ~, 4th Street · 6th Street between Haven Avenue & I- 15 Freeway · Archibald Avenue* · Arrow Route* · New Rochester Avenue* 30-31 ft 14-15ft. L.- ilkl. eettJlok from P.L. Plrkwly · ROW ~ 45lt. Itrlltl¢lpe ~ I!lu~dlmSl Outhick SECONDARY/SPECIAL BLVD. (88-foot ROW) · 6th Street (west of Haven Avenue) J - 4 ft, Sidewalk 12ft,.RO~ 35 It, Setbeak from P,L. -' -45 ft. Streetscape and Building Butback 17.,30-29 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 FIGURE 17.30.040'B (CONTINUED) STREETSCAPE SiETBACK SCHEDULE SECONDARY (88-foot ROW) · Vineyard Avenue · Hellman Avenue · 6th Street~ east of 1-15 Freeway · Hermosa Avenue · Jersey Boulevard ~See Subarea 15, Special Consideration ~-12 ft.I 2~-S0 ft. Min. Perkway[_ ~tblok kom P.L. - ROW r ~ ~8 ft,.~t, rne_te?.at~e. ~ LOCAL INDUSTRIAL (66-foot ROW) · Cleveland Avenue · 8th Street · 9th Street · Center Avenue · Santa Anita Avenue · (Old) Rochester Avenue · 7th Street 'west of Haven Avenue · Utica Avenue 17.30-30 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30. 040 Parkino Setbacks. Parking setbacks, as set forth in Table 17.30.040-B, may be included within the streetscape setback provided that the average landscape setback is maintained according to the street classification. Properties adjacent to residential areas shall have a minimum 45-foot building setback from property lines on the interior lot line and 45 feet from the ultimate face of curb on abutting streets, Areas of other industrial land use categories abutting an Industrial Park category shall have a minimum 45-foot building setback to the abutting property line on interior lot lines and 45 feet from ultimate face of curb on abutting streets. Buildino Hei.~ht. For buildings exceeding two stories or 35 feet as measured from highest finished grade, whichever is more restrictive, an additional 1-foot setback, as measured from ultimate face of curt), sha~ be required for each additional 1-foot in height. This setback need not exceed 70 feet.. ()R ,15 fl. Projections. Eaves, roof projections, awnings, stair landings, and similar architectural features may project into the building setback a maximum distance of 5 feet, provided such appendages are supported only at, or behind, the building setback line. tBUILDING ~'PROPERTY LINE 17.30-31 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 Parcels less than 225 feet deep from the ultimate curb face on Special Boulevards need not provide an average depth of landscaping or building setback greater than 25 feet or 20 percent of the depth o! property (as measured from ultimate face of curb), whichever is greater, except on Haven Avenue or within Master Planned developments. Buildings over two stories or 35 feet are stil~ subject to D.4 above. Landscape Re(~uirements. The purpose of landscaping is to provide the Industrial area greater aesthetic quality and a unified design theme and to promote energy conservation. The "primary landscape design concepts" listed in Section 17.30.070 shall applyto all landscape plans under these requirements. The following requirements shall be applied throughout the Industrial area. Minimum LandscaDe Coveracle. The minimum landscape coverage of net lot area (net lot area includes the area under property ownership excluding all right-of-way dedications and private streets) is as follows: Subarea HO** I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 LandscapeCoverage 25/30 12 10 12 12 7 '15 15 12 10'/5 10 12 15 12 12 10'/5 15 15 *** Within Subareas 9 and 15, the minimum landscape coverage shall be 10 percent of the net lot area between the area extending from Arrow Route to 1,000 feet south. All remaining areas shall have a 5 percent minimum landscape coverage. ** Haven Avenue Overlay District. *** Refer to Subarea 18 Specific Plan. Landscape Coveracje. The landscape coverage requirement may be modified by the Planning Commission when it is determined that the project is designed to the highest aesthetic quality compatible with the land use category and consistent with the surrounding land use. (i.e., within a Master Planned project area, variation of landscape coverage requirement may be allowed.) Berming. Bermed landscaping shall be incorporated wherever possible within the landscape setback and landscape areas surrounding parking and loading areas. On Special Boulevards, all parking areas shall be screened with berms an average height of 3 feet (maximum slope not to exceed 3Y~ :1). The design of the berms shall be undulating to provide interest and visual access to buildings. Trees. All required trees will be a minimum of 15-gallon size; except within the Industrial Park category where 30 percent of the required trees shall be 24-inch box size or larger. Within parking lots, trees will be planted at a rate of one tree for every three parking stalls provided in the planters. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building dimensions, particularly to interrupt expansive horizontal and vertical surfaces. Tree clusters may be used to satisfy specific design objectives. 17.30 -32 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 Go Along property boundaries, trees will be planted at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of interior property line. Tree clusters may be used to satisfy specific design objectives. Ex[3ansion Areas. Undeveloped areas proposed for future expansion shall be kept in a weed free condition and appropriate ground cover may be required. Graded pad sites may require temporary seeding with appropriate ground cover served by an automated irrigation system for erosion control to mitigate visual impact. Irri~jation System. All landscaped areas shall be served by an automatic underground irrigation system. Water Conservation. A combination of water conserving landscape and irrigation techniques are required such as, but not limited to, drought tolerant plant species, hardscape (non-irrigated) surfaces, and special irrigation systems such as drip emitters, low volume stream rotors, deep watering of trees and shrubs, tensiometers to measure soil moisture, and automatic timers. Property owners will be responsible for the development and maintenance of their on-site landscaped area and for the contiguous planted right-of-way. Any damage to the landscaping and irrigation systems shall be planted or replaced within 30 days from date of damage. In order to achieve a uniform landscape theme, the areas within the street medians, park strips, and streetscape setbacks shall have an established landscape materials pallet consistent with the City's landscaping theme. Landscaping materials should be selected for their longevity, drought tolerance, low maintenance, and heat and wind tolerance in addition to their aesthetic beauty and functionality. Table 17.30.040-C describes the landscaping materials and characteristics by street classification. Screenincl. The use or combination of berming, landscape materials, low level walls, and building mass shall be used to screen parking and loading areas and refuse collection areas from the public view. The following i.s a list of acceptable landscaping materials for low level screening: Bo~ni~lName Common Name Size at 3 Years Minimum Helaht X Width SDacina Buxus japonicum Japanese Boxwood 5 feet X 4 feet 3.0 feet on center Carisa grandiflora Natal Plum 5 feet X 4 feet 3.5 feet on center Coprosma baueri Coprosma 6 feet X 5 feet 3.5 feet on center Hakea suaveolens Sweet Hakea 6 feet X 5 feet 4.0 feet on center Hibiscus rosa-sinensis Chinese Hibiscus 5 feet X 5 feet 5.0 feet on center Ligustrum texanum Japanese Privet 6 feet X 4 feet 3.0 feet on center Myoporum laetum Myoporum 6 feet X 6 feet 5.0 feet on center Nerium oleander Oleander' 6 feet X 6 feet 4.0 feet on center Pittosporum tobira Tobira 3 feet X 4 feet 4.0 feet on center Viburnum japonicum Viburnum 6 feet X 5 feet 4.0 feet on center Xylosma congestum Xylosma 5 feet X 5 feet 4.0 feet on center 17.30-33 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 Table 17.30.040-C - Landscaping Materials Concept PLANTING PROVISIONS AND REPRESENTATIVE LOCATION CHARACTER TREE TYPES TREATMENT SPECIES Roadways designated Trees along primary Columnar evergreens or 1or special boulevard circulation routes play a deciduo~Jstrees, 60'- 100' treatment. ma~or role in defining the tall. City's image, especially at gateways to the City. Primary corridors separate the Industrial Area from residential areas. In Some ~cases trees can define edges and provide buffers. Curbside and median planting strips 5' - 14' wide. Trees planted 20' - 30' on center (10' less than the mature diameter* of the trees) on the average either formally or in less structured linear groves. *Mature diameter is defined as the diameter after 20 years. Major arterials and, secondary streets. Trees aloog secondary Columnar to round- Curbside and median circulation routes and headed, fan-shaped planting 5' - 14' wide. pdmary routes in the deciduous or evergreen Trees planted 20' - 50' on residential areas can trees, 50' .. 80'tall. center (10' less than the provide a transition to a mature diameter of the more human scale and to trees) on the average. a more structured community form. ~ Canopies can provide beth a definition of scale and shade. Collectorstreets, local Industrial areas are less Columnar to round- Curt)side planting 5' - 10' streets and setbacks formalthan commercial or headed, fan-shaped wide, trees planted 20' - on special beulevards residential. The role of deciduous, or evergreen 25' on center (10' less than in Industrial areas.. trees is to give the trees, 40' ... 70' tall. the mature diameter ol the expansive industrial area a trees) o~ the average. sense of scale end to Setback planting 13'wide, provide shade. trees planted informally 20' on center. EucaNotus robusta, Swamp Mahogany E. Sideroxyton rosea, Red Ironbark E. Camaldulensis, Red Gum Platanus acedfolia, London Plane P, Racemosa, Califomia Sycamore Fraxinus holotricha, 'ldoraine" Ash CelUs sinensis, Chinese Hackberry Acacia meianox¥1on, Black Acacia Gin;~ko Biloba, Maidenhair Tree Platanus acerifolia, London Plane P. Rscemose, California Sycamore Frax~nus holotricha, "Moraine" Ash Celtis sinensis, Chinese Hackberry Acacia melanox"vton, Black Acacia GinQko Biloba, Maidenhair Tree Ceratonia siliqua, Carob Cinnamonum camphora, Camphor Liquid amber stryraciflua, American Sweet Gum 17.30-34 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 Table 17.30.040-C (Continued)- Landscaping Materials Concept LOCATION CHARACTER TREE TYPES PLANTING PROVISIONS AND TREATMENT REPRESENTATIVE SPECIES Streets at commercial centers and bus stops. When a commemial center occurs along a residential or commercial street or major arterial, trees can indicate the change in character. Broad canopy trees can reflect the shifts from linear movement to activity center and the change in scale from automobile to pedestrian. A tree's ability to provide shade and to resist heat is essential for its use as a parking lot tree. Round-hea~K], deciduous Planters set into sidewalk and evergreen trees, 35' - paving, variable spacing. 50' tall in formal or informal clusters. Cellis sinensis, Chinese Hackberry Pistacia chinensis, Chinese pistache Platanus acerifolia, London Plane Tree Schinus terebinthifolius, Brazilian Pepper Cinnamomum camDhora, Camphor MaGnolia ~randiflora, Southern Magnolia Trees used to designate the entry to a parking lot should be different from the trees lining the street. Parking lots of commemial centers. A tree's ability to provide shade and to resist heat is essential for its use as a parking lot tree. Trees used to designate the entry to a parking lot should be different from the trees lining the street. Round-headed, spreading Strips between rows of Prunus evergreen trees, 35' - 50' parking stalls; planters Species Flowering tall. should extend into a Cherdes parking stall occasionally Ceratonia siliqua, Trees at entries may be to break up the straight Carob d e c i d u o u s a n d / o r rows. Trees planted a Cinnamomum cam~)hora, columnar. distance of 10' less than Camphor the tree's diameter at Ficusrubii3inosa, maturity on center. Rusty Leaf Fig Schinus terebinthifolius, A sufficient number of Brazilian Pepper trees shall be planted such Ulmus Danvifolia, that when they are Chinese Elm matured they will shade 50 percent of the parking area at solar noon on August 21 (1 p.m. Daylight Savings It time.). This entails, at a minimum, planting trees at the required spacing in all strips between parking stalls. Rail Service Standards. The purpose of Rail Service Standards is to provide for the use of rail service to those properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur lines as indicated on the subarea maps. Uses with dependency on Rail Service shall be encouraged to locate on properties (except those in Subarea 6) which adjoin such lines. Those uses which are not dependent on rail service are discouraged from locating on properties adjacent to lead or spur lines, The following standards are required for all developments which adjoin lead and spur railroad lines. Rail Service Standards are suggested guidelines for developing rail access. The railroad and the Public Utilities Commission may consider modification of track standards; therefore, the project designer should consult with the railroad at the time of project design. 17.30-35 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 Easement width for a lead line, single-rail track - 32 feet; and for a double-rail track - 41 feet. Rail lead track and nearby street elevations shall approximate one another in height. c. The minimum radius of curvature for a track shall be 180 feet. do Maximum permissible gradient along spur tracks shall be no greater than 11/2 - 2 percent. Dock height shall be set between 4V2 to 5 feet above the top of rail of the spur track. At-grade road crossings by railroads should be avoided wherever possible. Rail crossings and any spur construction must be approved by the railroad and the Public Utilities Commission. Spur trackage is not permitted along any building frontage and must be confined to the side or rear portions of the buildings. Lot division and building layouts for properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead and spur lines shall be done in a mariner to ensure full potential of future rail access and use and should not preclude rail access to other properties adjacent to such rail lines. Subdivisions which could reduce a properry's ability to accommodate potential rail served developments may not be authorized. Easements shall be provided for lead/spur lines as indicated on the subarea maps in conjunction with development proposals or lot subdivisions. Building design shall include rail service features to ensure the potential use of available spur lines. Finished floor elevations and dock height door or "kick out" wall panels shall be provided in all properties abutting rail lines. Within portions of Subareas 6 and 11, rail access is permitted under condition that adequate screening is provided for non-rail service areas. Refer to Subareas 6 and 11 for further details. o The above-referenced rail service development standards may be amended or deleted on a site-by-site basis during the Development/Design Review process. The following must be determined by the Planning Commission in order to authorize any modification of the Rail Service Standard: That installation of a lead or spur track cannot be accomplished due to physical constraints on or adjacent to the project site; and Other existing or potential rail service properties will not be negatively affected in their ability to accommodate rail service activity as a result of modifications to the standards. 17.30-36 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 LEAD TRACK DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS LEAD TRACK I 1 I I 16.0'-'~, / ,~, '16.0' R: 9( 0.538' 6o 05' 14' till R: 603.805' 9o 30' 00" / I ~. OPERTY 'IL Iltl MAIN SANTA Ff TRACK 17.30-37 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.040 Interim Use Standards. The purpose of Interim Use Standards is to establish minimum standards for setbacks, landscaping, screening, and parking which meet the intent of the Industria~ districts. Unless specifically modified through a Conditional Use Permit, all other devel,opment standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall apply, including, but not limited to, grading, drainage, and street improvements. The following standards shall apply in all Industrial areas: The minimum streetscape and parking setback requirement shall be contiguous with the ultimate right-of-way line, but in no case less than 10 feet. There shall be no minimum landscape coverage requirements, except that which is necessary for screening purposes as determined by the City Planner. All parking and storage areas shall be paved with slag, crushed aggregate, asphaltic concrete, or concrete. 'l'he location, number, and design of said parking shall be in accordance with Code requirements. All parking and storage areas, and other interim uses which require screening as determined by the City Planner, shall be screened from public view through a combination of landscaping and fencing. Fencing may include a 6-foot chain link fence with slats, masonry or concrete, wood, or decorative metal. Screening must be maintained in good condition at all times. Landscaping required for screening purposes shall include 15-gallon trees and 5-gallon shrubs to provide a dense landscape buffer to afford maximum screening from the public view, satisfactory to the City Planner. Material Recovery Facility Standards. The purpose of Material Recovery Facility Standards is to establish minimum standards for screening, parking, noise, and litter control which meet the intent of the industrial area. Unless specifically modified through a Conditional Use Permit, all other development standards of the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall apply, including but not limited to, grading, drainage, and street improvements. All business operations shall be conducted within an enclosed building, unless specifically permitted within the General Industrial and Heavy Industrial categories, and adequately screened from public view pursuant to Section 17.30.040.A, General Provisions, for the industrial area; in particular, screening from the I-15 Freeway shall be required. All facilities shall be maintained free of litter and vermin and any other undesirable material and shall be cleaned of loose debris on a daily basis. The facility shall meet the parking requirements for warehouse uses. In addition, stacking space shall be provided for six vehicles or the anticipated peak customer load, whichever is higher. If no drive-up facilities are available, then a minimum of six additional spaces for customer drop-off shall be provided. Power-driven equipment, including aluminum foil and can compacting or bailing, necessary for efficient temporary storage and shipment of material shall be permitted. Indo(~r Wholesale/Retail Commercial Criteria. To ensure that surrounding land uses are not negatively impacted, additional filing requirements shall include a Site Management Plan and a Traffic Impact Study as described below: 1 '7.30-38 6/99 Rancho Cucamo,nga Development Code Sections 17.30.040 & 17.30.050 1. Site Management Plan: Issues such as security and site maintenance shall be addressed by the applicant to ensure that adequate services are provided for clientele and surrounding land uses. Items to be addressed within the Site Management Plan are: a. Trash collection and site maintenance; b. Security and safety control measures; c. Parking attendants and circulation directors; d. Graffiti removal and building maintenance; and e. Personnel management. 2. Traffic Impact Studv: Because of the possible traffic intensity related to the uses, a Traffic Impact Study shall be submitted to the City Engineer addressing the following items: a. Trip generation; b. Traffic volume distribution; c. Access analysis; d. Internal circulation; and e. Mitigation measures, if required by the analysis, shall be shown. Section 17.30.050 - Performance Standards The purpose of Performance Standards is to establish industrial Use Standard characteristics which a~low the uses to operate consistent with the overall characteristics of the land use category. This section bases its determination on land use characteristics of each category. The intent of the Performance Standards is to provide for a healthy, safe, and pleasing environment in keeping with the nature and level of surrounding Industrial activity. The Performance Standards contained with Table 17.30.050-A, are applied on a subarea basis as follows: CLASS A - 6, 7, 12, 16, 17 CLASS B- 1,2,3,4,5,8, 10, 11, 13, 14 CLASS C - 9, 15 CLASS A Performance Standards are the most restrictive of the Performance Standards. It is utilized for the Industrial Park category. CLASS B Performance Standards are employed for the General Industrial categories. These standards are intended to provide for the broadest range of Industrial activity while assuring a basic level environmental protection. CLASS C Performance Standards provide for a level of industrial activity associated with the Heavy Industrial use while providing safeguards. 17~30-39 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.050 Table 17.30.050-A- Industrial Performance Standards C~SSA C~SSB C~SSC CLASS A. It is the intent of the standards ot this section to ensure a high quality working environment and available sites for industrial and business firms whose functional and economic needs require protection from the adverse affects of noise, odors, vibratiorl, glare, or high- intensity illumination, and other nuisances. CLASS B: It is the intent of the standards of this section to provide for uses whose operational needs may produce noise, vibration, particulate matter and air contaminants, odors, or humidity, heat, and glare which cannot be mitigated sufficiently to meet the Class A standards. The standards are so designed to protect uses on adjoining sites from affects which could adversely affect their functional and economic viability. CLASS C: It is the intenl of the standards of this section to make allowances for industrial uses whose associated processes produce noise, particulate matter and air contaminants, vibration, odor, humidity, heat, glare, or high-intensity which would adversely affect the functional and economic viability of other uses. The standards, when combined with standards imposed by other governmental agencies, serve to provide basic health and safely protection for persons employed within or visiting the area. Noise: The maximum allowable exterior noise level of any use shall not exceed 65 Ldn as measured by any Iocatioo on the lot occupied by such uses. Where a structure is occupied by more than one use, the noise level shall not be in excess ol 60 Ldn as measured within the interior space of the neighboring establishment. Noise caused by motor vehicles are exempted from this standard Noise: The maximum allowable noise level of any use shall not exceed 75 Ldn as measured at the lot line of the lot containing the use. Where a use occupies a lot abutting residenttally zoned land, the noise level shall not exceed 65 Ldn as measured at the common lot line. Noise caused by motor vehicles and trains are exempted from this standard. Vibration: All uses shall be so operated as not to generate vibration discernible withoul inslruments by the average person while on or beyond the lot upon which the source is located or within an adjoining enclosed space if more than one establishment occupies a structure. Vibration caused by motor vehicles, trains, and temporary' construction or demolition work is exempted from this standard. Vibration: All uses shall be operated so as not to generate vibration discernible without instruments by the average persons beyond the lot upon which the source is located. Vibration caused motor vehicles, trains, and temporary construction or demolition is exempted from this standard. Noise: The maximum allowable noise level of any use shall not exceed 85 L(in as measured at the lot line of the lot containing the use. Where a use is within 200 leer of residenttally zoned land, the noise level shall not exceed 65 Ldn. Where a use occupies a lot abutting or separated by a street from a lot within the designated Class A or B performance standard or residential property, the performance standard of the abutting property shall apply at the common or facing lot line. Vibration: All uses shall be operated so as not to generate vibration discernible without instruments by the average person beyond 600' from where the source is located. Vibration caused by motor vehicles, trains, and temporary construction and demolition is exempted from this standard. Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants: In addition to compliance with the Air Quality Maintenance District (AQMD) standards, all uses shall be operated so as not to emit particulate matter or air contaminants which are readlty detectable without instruments by the average person while on the lot containing such uses. Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants: In addition !o compliance with the AQMD standards, all uses shall be operated so as not to emit particulate matter or air contaminants which are :readily detectable without instruments by the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants: In addition to compliance with the AQMD standards, all uses shall be operated so as not to emit particulate matter or air contaminants which: (a) are injurious to the health of either persons engaged in or related to the use of the lot, or persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating in neighboring areas; (b) substantially and adversely affect the maintenance of property in nearby areas; (c) are disruptive of industrial processes carried on in other parts of the Industrial Area. Where a use occupies a lot abutting or separated by a street lot with designated Class A or B performance standard for particulate matter and air contaminants shall apply al the common or facing lot line. Odor: All uses shall be operated so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors which are perceptible to the average person while within or beyond the lot containing such uses. Odpr: Ait uses shall be operated so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors which are perceptible to the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. Odor: All uses shall be operaled so as not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors which are perceptible to the average person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. Definition Ldn: Day-night average sound level. The day-night sound level is a measure of the cumulative noise exposure in the community. It results from the summation of an average noise level determined over a 24-hour time period with a weighing factor applied during the night time ~eriod (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.). 17,3O-40 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.050 & 17.30.060 Table 17.30.050-A (Continued) - Industrial Performance Standards C~SSA C~SSB C~SSC Humidity, Heat, and Glare: All uses shall be operated so as not to produce humidity, heat, glare, or high-intensity illumination which is perceptible without i~nstruments by lhe average person while on or beyond the lot containing such use. Humidity, Heat, and Glare: All uses shall be operated so as not to produce humidity, heat, glare, or high-intensi~y illumination which is perceptible without instruments by the average person beyond the lot line of any lot containing such use. Humidity, Heat, and Glare: All uses shall be operated so as not to produce humidity, heat, glare, or high-intensity illumination which is perceplible without inslruments by the average person while on any lot zoned for residential purposes or any industrial property with a Class A or B performance standard designation. Section 17.30.060 - General Design Guidelines Intent. The intent of these guidelines is to assist the designer in understanding and complying with the City's standards for building and site design. These guidelines are based upon community design goals as expressed in the General Plan and encourage the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property together with associated facilities, such as signs, landscaping, parking areas, and streets. They establish a high standard for design quality but are flexible enough to allow individual expression and imaginative solutions. The establishment of Urban Design Standards and Guidelines provides the City with the ability to ensure that all development in the Industrial area has compatible architecture and enhanced design quality. These guidelines are general and through the Design Review Process are intended to encourage the individual creativity of project designers as well as provide for the needs of the individual owner and user. Applicability. The provisions of this section shall apply to all industrial districts, unless otherwise specified herein. Any addition,. remodeling, relocation, or construction requiring a building permit within any industrial district is subject to Development/Design Review pursuant to Chapter 17.06. Guidelines. The structure and its relationship to other structures, uses, views, existing site condition, and availability of rail access (if applicable), should be the dominant factors in the design and orientation of buildings. Architectural statements, while being strong, should not conflict from site to site or building to building. This section deals with the physical appearance of the. Industrial area. While more specific urban design guidelines for each subarea are incorporated in Section 17.30.080, this section describes the overall, area-wide design concept addressing physical form and appearance, open space network, special features, and gateways. Physical Form and Appearance. The Industrial districts have been divided into 18 subareas, each of which is designated with one of six land use categories. The development standards specified for each of these subareas will distinguish them from each other by the types of uses permitted or conditionally permitted, parcel sizes, setback requirements, landscaping, performance requirements, vehicular and rail access, and parking provisions. The distinction of each subarea will serve as a mechanism to create and enhance the identity of each subarea. The Industrial districts form a part of the community fabric by integration into an arterial roadway network which serves the entire City. The area's identity is further enhanced by the development of specially designed landscape themes at arterial roadway entry points into the Industrial area. 17,,30-41 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.060 Each land use category is further distinguished by general architectural themes based upon the planned land use intensity. While the themes may vary, a high quality of design is expected in all land use categories of the Industrial districts. There are six land use categories in the Industrial districts: Industrial Park category has been designated for five subareas. Primary uses in this category include custom light manufacturing, light wholesale storage and distribution, administrative and office, and professional services. This area is reserved for firms seeking attractive and pleasant working environments and a location which has prestige value. High-quality architecture is required and site planning must emphasize a pedestrian-oriented, campus-like setting with the greatest amount of landscaping. The development of prefab, all metat sheathing for buildings is considered inappropriate for this category. The Industrial Park category is typically located adjacent to special boulevards (major thoroughfares) to enhance major gateways into the community and create a high-quality image. In addition, the Industrial Park category i's used as a transition from Industrial to Residential uses. General Industrial category has ,been established for seven subareas. This category is intended to accommodate a wide range of light to medium manufacturing and wholesale, storage, distribution uses. Typically, administrative, office, and professional services are not allowed to reduce the potential for land use conflicts. Design and technical standards are less demanding than for the !~ndustrial Park category, but safeguards are provided to ensure a pleasant, well-functioni~ng environment. The development of prefab, all metal sheathing for buildings is considered inappropriate for this category. Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial category is designated for Subarea 9. This category provides for heavy manufacturing and wholesale storage and distribution uses which do not have a significant aesthetic i,mpact on the surrounding area. Not permitted in this area are massive outside, structures such as cranes or unscreened storage of raw or finished products. Landscaping requirements in Subarea 9 along Arrow Route have been increased to create a smoother transition to the adjoining Industrial Park and General Industrial property. .Heavy Industrial category has been designated for Subarea 15. Permitted uses include medium, minimum impact, and heavy industrial manufacturing and each of the wholesale storage and distribution uses. Design and technical standards in this category allow ,massive outdoor structures and open air storage in an unscreened manner. A high degree of rail usage may also be typical. Mixed Use category has been designated for a portion of Subarea 18. This category is intended to encourage the mix of different, but compatible, land uses and activities with in a single integrated development. Mixed use developments are ideally suited adjacent to high activity nodes along major transportation corridors, particularly adjacent to public transit facilities to establish a built-in ridership. Mixed use projects can incorporate a wide range of commercial and industrial activities, including medium, light, and custom manufacturing; research and development; office; recreation; and commercial. Open Space has been designated for a portion of Subarea 18. Permitted uses include golf courses, outdoor recreation areas, and parks. 17..30-42 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.060 E. Special Emphasis Areas. Haven Avenue Overlay District is located on both sides of Haven Avenue from Foothill Boulevard south to 4th Street. Haven Avenue is a major north-south travel route and contains high-end office development with the unique combination of direct access to the Ontario Airport and the Interstate 10 Freeway. The standards in the Overlay District are designed to enhance Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high-quality, and prestigious gateway into the community. A progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development is required and special site planning and landscaping requirements are included to enhance the pedestrian environment and create a campus-like atmosphere. Interstate 15 (Devore Freeway) runs north-south through the Industrial area and borders seven subareas in each land use category except for General Industrial/Rail Served. Since this area is directly south of the future regional mall and related commercial activities at the I-15 Freeway and Foothill Boulevard, and views along the freeway have a major impact on the image and identity of Rancho Cucamonga, highest consideration should be given to design aspects that affect a positive image of the community as viewed from the freeway. Special considerations are contained in the Development Standards for each subarea which abuts the I-15 Freeway. (An I-15 Overlay District could provide special development criteria to eliminate unsightly views.) Special Boulevards. The General Plan states that travel routes are predominant elements of the community's image and encourages the distinctiveness of individual districts and roadway corridors. In addition, the General Plan states that a consistent design theme is necessary to reinforce the image of perception of a route. Within the Industrial districts, nine special boulevards are included. The following is a brief description of the primary function and identity for the most significant special boulevards including Foothill Boulevard, Haven Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Archibald Avenue, and 4th Street. Foothill Boulevard serves as the major east-west transportation corridor through the City. It also links the area east of Haven Avenue including the planned communities and regionat, shopping mall with the commercial area to the east. Within the Industrial districts (Subareas 6 & 7'), new development along Foothill Boulevard must provide a transition to commercial and office facilities within the Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans and the Etiwanda Specific Plan areas, and shall comply with Section 17.32.060, Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines. Given the high visibility, office and commercial service type uses will predominate. Any light manufacturing or warehouse buildings will have to be designed to the highest quality and be compatible with commercial and residential environments on the north side of Foothill Boulevard. Archibald Avenue serves primarily as a support service function to the Industrial area. A variety of industrial, commercial, and residential uses exist along major portions of the street. The major opportunity along Archibald Avenue is on the west side of the street south of 6th Street. New development in this area must be compatible with adjacent residential uses and provide an appropriate transition in terms of architecture, site planning, and landscaping. One story buildings in scale with the single family homes fronting on 6th Street and pedestrian connections to residential should be provided. 17.30-43 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code FIGURE 17.30.060-A Sections 17.30.060 DAY ~tOCHES TEI~ IL -/ 17.30-44 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.060 Milliken Avenue will function as a primary north-south arterial through the Industrial area and connect the planned communities of Victoria and Terra Vista south to Interstate 10. Unlike other special boulevards with adjoining subareas designated Industrial Park, Milliken Avenue cuts through six different subareas and four land use categories, including Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial. Traffic counts will be similar to Haven Avenue, but a greater mix of truck traffic is expected along with the potential of different commuter traffic hours because of varying em ptoyee shifts in the area. Given this setting, the functional and visual identity of Milliken Avenue will be influenced by a wide range of land uses. Building types may range from offices in multi-tenant industrial to large-scale distribution and manufacturing. However, to assure aesthetic quality and design uniformity, all architectural elevations along Milliken Avenue should be enhanced with variations in building form and articulation of services. In addition, outdoor storage, loading areas, and truck parking should not be visible from the street. 4th Street is the boundary between Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontario, east of Cucamonga Creek (Hellman Avenue). As such, a series of gateways are planned at major intersections along 4th Street (Archibald Avenue, Haven Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Interstate 15, and Etiwanda Avenue). A consistent program of special landscape features. and street monumentation signs with the City's emblem is to be implemented. Landscape Design. Landscaping serves as a major design component of the urban design image of the Industrial districts. Through the variation of landscaping design and standards, distinction and identity of individual subareas and roadways can be achieved. To this end, the average depth of landscaping along street frontages and the percentage of net land area devoted to landscaping is varied. To distinguish special boulevards, landscaped median islands, meandering sidewalks, and street name monumentation signs are planned. Throughout the Industrial area, these primary landscape design concepts should be followed: Streetscape: Street trees of similar species establish a consistent design pattern within the parkway of each street; evergreen trees shall be used as a backdrop for deciduous, particularly where needed to screen unsightly views and enhance building elevations; shrub planting and berming provides the desired screening of the parking areas. On-Site Landscaping: Provides canopy trees for shading outdoor pedestrian areas and parking lots; breaks up lengthy building elevations along the side and rear properties with tree planting; use evergreen pines for wind protection and to screen undesirable views. Special Accent Treatment: includes the addition of special landscape design features such as color accents, specimen tree planting, decorative rockscape, and pavement details to provide visual enhancements to roadway intersections, driveway approaches, pedestrian walkways, and building entries. Pedestrian Amenities: Provides for the inclusion of a pedestrian circulation system and accompanying plaza and patios as an integral part of a unified site design. Such a plan provides for the safe and orderly transition of vehicular and pedestrian traffic by means of clearly identifiable and attractive walkways. Tree Size/Stakinq: Specimen size trees (24-inch box or larger) are encouraged to promote the early establishment of mature plantings. Severe wind conditions require all trees to be staked or guy wires used per City standards. 17.30-45 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.060 Drouclht Tolerance: Because of the community's arid climate, the use of drought tolerant plant material is strongly encouraged. Turf should be limited to areas of major design emphasis with the use of rockscape/hardscape and groundcover to limit water consumption. Irrigation: Water conserving irrigation techniques are required. Deep root watering systems for trees, particularly in tud areas, are encouraged. Open Space Network: Elements that constitute open space include parks, outdoor recreation areas, creeks and channels, transmission corridors, and stormwater retention areas. In addition, to the extent that they provide amenities, development setback areas, and street landscaping with associated pedestrian and bicycle paths also compliment open space. Easements for creeks, channels, and power line corridors traverse the Industrial area, linking them with the City's regions and National Forest open space areas. Directly south of 4th Street between the Cucamonga Creek and Hermosa Avenue is Guasti Regional Park, comprised of approximately 200 acres, to which both Cucamonga and Deer Creek Channels connect. While all of these linear open space components run north/south, this chapter proposes east/west connections of open space, incorporating the setback requirements along major arterials, as well as related buffer landscaping provisions along certain land use edges. The private open space areas, developed internally within the planned industrial projects, should connect with the area-wide open space network wherever possible, to avoid fragmentation of open space to unify the area-wide appearance. Special Features. Special features refer to areas of visual, historic, and activity focal points within and near the Industrial area. These features should be respected and development and redevelopment around them should compliment and enhance their scale and character. The coordinated improvements of the special features and the corridors along which they are located, should further help unify the overall appearance of the Industrial area and the City. The old Cucamonga historic commercial center at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue and the location of Thomas Winery at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, are also of historic interest. A 42~acre Rancho Cucamonga Adullt Sports Park featuring year-round sports activities, including the Rancho Cucamonga Stadium, is located on the west side of Rochester Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard. A 150-.acre public goff course stretches from 4th Street to the Metrolink tracks, west of Milliken Avenue. The course provides significant vistas from 6th Street. Also along Foothill Boulevard near its interchange at the Interstate 15 is proposed a major regional shopping center (over one million square feet of floor space containing six department stores on approximately 100 acres of land). This would be a significant commercial activity center of regional impact. Gateways. Certain points of access to the City will, by use, become major entrances to the Industrial area. A significant portion of the visitors' and users' impressions of the Industrial area are influenced by conditions at these locations. Hence, it is imperative that special considerations be given to the development and design of these gateway areas. As shown in Figure 17.30.060-A, gateway areas are identified along the major roadways that form the industrial area (and City) boundaries--4th Street, Foothill Boulevard, Etiwanda Avenue, 17.30-46 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.060 and Arrow Route. The gateway of primary importance is located at the intersect[on of Haven Avenue and 4th Street. Other major gateways to the industrial area include Archibald Avenue at 4th Street, Milliken Avenue at 4th Street, Interstate 15 interchange at 4th Street, the proposed Interstate 15 interchange at 6th Street, and Interstate 15 interchange at Foothill Boulevard. Utilities. To enhance the beauty and character of the community, all new and existing utility lines, including electric distribution lines of 34.5KV and less, shall be undergrounded as a condition of development. Architecture and Design. The purpose of Architecture and Design Standards and Guidelines, is to ensure that the built environment within the Industrial area is compatible with the nature and use of each land use category. The goal is to ensure high-quality, timeless building design, which includes building entry focal point, sufficient articulation to the building plane, and the creative use of building materials. The standards and guidelines are intended to result in a well- -designed environment which is safe and pleasing to work within. These standards and guidelines shall apply on an area wide basis and, where noted, within certain land use categories. The design of buildings and site plans should be compatible with surrounding land use and architecture and should recognize the climate, physical setting, and best architectural traditions of: Southern California,. Building orientation should include considerations of wind protection of site activities. Desirable architecture shall proiect a high-quality, progressive, sophisticated style of development. Variations in architectural style and construction methods and materials are encouraged. All building entrances shall be well articulated and project a formal entrance statement through variations in architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscape plazas, as well as relate to pedestrians. The articulated building entrances, together with the landscape plazas, should be designed to relate to, and connect with, the area-wide network of open space, thus, unifying and fostering a sense of community. The degree of architectural treatment and embellishments must relate to the scale and mass of the building. 6. Accent treatment, such as changes in exterior materials and texture, is required. The creative use of building materials is required. A minimum of two primary building materials shall be used. The recommended primary and secondary building materials are as follows: Primary building materials .. concrete, sandblasted concrete, textured block, brick, granite, marble, and similar materials as approved by the Design Review Committee. Secondary building materials - glass, tile, polished brass or copper, brick, concrete, painted metal elements, painted accent stripe, and other similar materials as approved by the Design Review Committee. 17~30-47 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.060 All exterior wall elevations of buildings and screen walls shall have architectural treatment. Articulation of elevation surfaces is encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create texture and shadow patterns and provide variety to a building plane or surface. At ground level, expanses of blank building walls shall be minimized with creative use of materials, textures, color, and/or building form. 10. 11. Colors, materials, and finishes shall be coordinated in all exterior elevations of the buildings to achieve a total continuity of design. Building materials, colors, and textures shall be compatible with those of adjacent or nearby buildings. 12. The use of prefab, all metal steel sheathing for buildings is prohibited from the Industrial Park and General Industrial categories. This is not to preclude the use of metal detail within architecturally designed buildings such as "Cortin" steel. Where used, metal buildings shall be architecturally designed to be compatible with surrounding land use and architecture. 13. The height and bulk of buildings shall not unduly block views and solar access of adjacent and other nearby buildings. 14. Maximum building or structure height shall not exceed four stories or 75 feet whichever is greater, unless approved through the Conditional Use Permit process. Site Plannincl. The purpose of Site Planning Standards and Guidelines is to ensure for a functional, safe, and visually pleasing environment for those who may pass through or work in the area. The following standards and guidelines shall apply throughout the Industrial area. Building placement shall be designed in such a way to create opportunities for plazas or other landscaped open spaces and encourage defined and spaciously enclosed open space on the same site or adjoining sites. Building orientation should include consideration of wind protection for site activities. The City Planner may require a detailed wind analysis of designs in question for adequacy (in wind protection) as a part of development application. The access and circulation of a development should be designed to provide a safe and efficient system, both on- and off-site. Points of access shall be designed in conformance with the City's access regulations. The circulation system shall be designed to reduce conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on adjacent properties, combine circulation and access areas where possible, and provide adequate maneuvering areas. Points of access shall not conflict with other planned or existing access points. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, pullouts, and pads shall be provided if determined necessary by the City Engineer and City Planner in consultation with the local transit provider. Parking areas should not be the dominant element in the overall design of a project and should be designed to minimize visual disruption. Parking areas should be screened from streets through combinations of mounding, landscaping, low profile walls, and grade separations. The design of parking areas should also minimize vehicle noise, lights and 17,30-48 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.30.060 glare, and ambient air temperature. This can be accomplished through the use of sound walls, general location, use of well-designed lights and landscaping throughout the parking lot. Landscaping and open spaces should be designed as an integral part of the overall site plan design, and be designed to create visual interest and variety to the streetscape; enhance building architecture; screen utilities; and buffer views of automobiles, pavement and service areas; and define and distinguish the pedestrian environment from vehicular spaces. Consideration should be given to wind protection of building and site activities by the buffer planting of wind tolerant trees and shrubs. Pedestrian Orientation. Colonnades or loggias and other covered walkways or structures that provide shade to pedestrian spaces shall be utilized whenever possible. Employee outdoor eating areas shall be provided as an integral part of site designs. 1. At street level, the use of building materials and building details that relate to human activity shall be required where appropriate. 2. Convenient pedestrian circulation shall be provided throughout all projects to connect public streets, parking areas, and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open spaces. 3. Open spaces shall be integrated with pedestrian walks and defined by landscaping and other elements to create a sense of place. 4. Where possible, open spaces shall be accessible to the public. Street Furniture. Benches, light standards, kiosks, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, and other street furniture in on-site open spaces shall be designed in a coordinated fashion to enhance the appearance and function of the site and open space. 1. Pedestrian areas shall be highly visible and well lit. 17,30-49 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.070 Section 17.30.070 - Trip Reduction A minimum of one shower facility accessible to both men and women shall be provided for persons walking or bicycling to work for each project which meets the following thresholds: Commemial 250,000 square feet Industrial 325,000 square feet Office 125,000 square feet Hotels and Motels 250 rooms B. Office Parks with 1,000 or more employees shall provide on-site video conference facilities. Ride-sharing encompasses all forms of transportation that involve pre-arranged shared rides for travelers with similar origins, destinations, and travel schedules. Included are carpools, vanpools, and subscription bus (commuter club bus) services. The primary market for ride- sharing is the work commute trip, which makes ride-sharing a promising means to reduce traffic in the Industrial area. Within Rancho Cucamonga, ride-sharing is facilitated and promoted by Commuter Computer. Results; other sources have indicated that employer-sponsored programs can be most effective, particularly for larger employers. Actions that can be taken by employers include: Distributing ride-sharing rnatching forms to all new employees and regularly to contin uing employees; 2. Surveys of employees to determine interest in ride-sharing; Designation of staff member to assist other employees in finding carpool matches; Advertising and promotions to generate interest and viability for the program; 5. Tailoring of work hours to facilitate ride-sharing; 6. Provisions of preferentially located or priced parking for carpoolers; Leasing of vans, at cost, for employees who vanpool; Provision of company fleet cars at nominal cost for commuting by carpoolers; Subsidization of subscription bus services, particularly in the early period of formation; and 10. Modified work hours. 17,30-50 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 Section 17.30.080 - Overlay Districts & Subarea Development Standards This Section provides development standards for the individual subareas of the Industrial Districts and for specific sections of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard (Subareas 6 & 7) which cross through the industrial area. Because of the City-wide significance of Haven Avenue as the major entry into the City, the Haven Avenue Overlay District provisions have been placed at the beginning of this part followed by those of the subareas. The purpose of preparing subarea development standards is to identify the most prominent development standards applied within each of the 18 subareas in the Industrial districts. For each subarea the following categories have been identified and discussed: 2. 3. 4. 5. Land Use Designation Primary Function Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses Access and Circulation Special Considerations The list d,escri.bed above does not intend to cover every specific development requirement which may be utilized in developing within the industrial area, but does provide a quick overview of the major development considerations within each subarea. Any person interested in developing within the boundaries of the Industrial districts should refer to this Chapter in its entirety for an in-depth discussion of all the development constraints, opportunities, and standards. Any special conditions which may provide exception or modification to development requirement are discussed within the "Special Consideration" topic of each subarea. 17.30-51 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-A HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT Revi. ed 4/1/92 Urban Center CIRCULATION llll 120' R.O.W. llal, 100' R.O.W. 88' or lees RAIL SERVICE :: .~:: Existing ~'+'+ ++" Proposed TRAILS/ROUTES O ooo Pedestrian · ·®e Bicycle ':~E:2 Regional ./' Multi--Use Special Streetscape/ Landscaping Power Line/ Utility Easement Creaks & Channels "~ Accesl Points ~:~ 1park L ........... Acres Z 17.30-52 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 A. Haven Avenue Overlay District. Purpose. The purpose o,f the Overlay District is to establish development standards which address the unique setting and character of the Haven Avenue Corridor. The Haven Avenue Overlay District is located on both the east and west sides of Haven Avenue extending from Foothill Boulevard south to 4th Street, as shown in Figure 17.30.080-A. Applicability. The Haven Avenue Overlay District is to be applied in conjunction with Subareas 6 and 7 and provides more specific and/or restrictive development policies, design standards, and land use regulations for both Subareas. Topics not specifically covered by the Haven Avenue Overlay District will continue to be governed by the regulations of the Industrial Districts. Development adjacent to the Haven Avenue Overlay District shall consider compatibility and integration with the Overlay District through the Master Plan process. Setting. Haven Avenue is located near the geographic center of the City and will be the most significant gateway into Rancho Cucamonga. Another important aspect is the distinctiveness of the Haven Avenue Corridor in relation to other major arterials designated as "Special Boulevards." Haven Avenue is the major travel route for the City and has the potential for high-end office development with a unique combination of direct access to the airport and the Interstate 10 Freeway. This provides the City a rare opportunity to enhance its image by encouraging intensive, high-quality office and professional development along the Haven Avenue Corridor. Relation to General Plan. The General Plan affirms that travel routes are predominate elements of the community's image and encourages the distinctiveness of individual districts and roadway corridors. In addition, the General Plan states that a consistent design theme is necessary to reinforce the image or perception of a route. The Haven Avenue Corridor and the Industrial Park category should be designed to project a "campus like image for firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment with high prestige value." Goal Statement. Goals are statements that define the community's aspiration and intentions. The goal for the Haven Avenue Corridor has evolved from sessions with the industrial and business communities and the City's elected and appointed officials. This goal represents the current conception of and future aspirations for the best interest of the City for the Haven Avenue Corridor. The Haven Avenue Corridor goal is to: Encourage long-range master planned development along the Haven Avenue Corridor which enhances Rancho Cucamonga's image by providing an intensive, high-quality gateway into the City and by promoting a distinctive, attractive, and pleasant office park atmosphere in a campus-like setting with high prestige identity. Land Use Types. The intent of the following policies is to encourage land uses and development consistent with the design goal for the Haven Avenue Corridor as an intensive, high-quality gateway into the community. The primary land use function along Haven Avenue is intended to be of an administrative/professional and office nature. However, on the parcels directly adjacent to the railroad, the Planning Commission may consider additional uses 17 ~30-53 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 permitted in Subarea 6, subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit, and a finding that such a use will be consistent with the stated design goal for the Haven Avenue Corridor and all other provisions of the Overlay District. Select ancillary research services and commercial and business support service uses shall not exceed 20 percent of the floor area in any Master Planned development. Concentration of such uses in any building or along the street frontage is not permitted. The following land use types are permitted or conditionally permitted within the Haven Avenue Overlay District. All other uses shall be prohibited. (1) Permitted Uses Administrative and Office Administrative Civic Services Business Supply Retail Sales & Services* Business Support Services* Communication Services Cultural Financial, Insurance, and Real Estate Services Flood Control/Utility Corridor Hotel/Motel Medical/Health Care Services Professional/Design Services Restaurants (2) ConditionalIv Permitted Uses Convenience Sales and Services* Day Care Facility Entertainment Fast Food Sales* Personal Services* Public Assembly Public Safety and Utility Services Recreation Facilities Religious Assembly Restaurants with Bar or Entertainment Schools *Ancillary uses limited to 20 percent of the floor area per 5.b above. Fast food services are specifically excluded as a primary use. This would preclude the development of typical free-standing fast food restaurants, most of which require drive-through facilities, in the Haven Avenue Overlay District. However, fast food could be permitted as an ancillary or secondary use, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, as a part of a larger project, provided such use not be located directly adjacent to Haven Avenue. Accessorv/Ancillarv Use Restrictions. The purpose of this section is to set maximum development provisions for accessory/ancillary uses which are not 17.30-54 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 normally permitted in the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The following provisions shall apply in the Haven Avenue Overlay District: (1) The total of all accessory/ancillary uses not listed as permitted or conditionally permitted uses* are limited to 20 percent of the total building and business area. The ancillary commercial and business support service uses listed in Section 5.b may exceed the 20 percent business area limitation. (2) Accessory/ancillary uses must be located within main buildings housing permitted principal uses. No outdoor accessory/ancillary uses are permitted. (3) No accessory/ancillary manufacturing uses are permitted in the Haven Avenue Overlay District. * Only uses defined and listed in Section 17.30.030.D can be considered as accessory or ancillary uses. Master Planned Development. The intent of this section is to provide for integrated development at the earliest possible time in the review process. Through the Master Plan process, there are opportunities to coordinate the efforts of single or multiple property owners and discourage piecemeal development. Finally, master planning of defined areas will avoid development of single parcels of land in a manner which would prevent or preclude future development of adjacent parcels in the best way feasible. It is not the intention of the master planning process to cast future development patterns in stone. Rather, it is an attempt to. discover problems before they develop, to deal with issues while they can be solved, and to take advantage of opportunities while they exist. The standards and guidelines which follow are intended to apply to all projects and should not be constrained by parcel lines or specific site boundaries. A Conceptual Master Plan shall be submitted for Planning Commission approval, together with any development proposal, including subdivision or parcel map applications. Such Master Plan shall address relationships to other parcels within the Master Plan area. At minimum, Master Plans shall indicate conceptual building locations, overall circulation, points of ingress and egress to both public and private streets, parking lot layouts, conceptual grading and drainage, areas to be used for landscaping and plazas, pedestrian circulation, and common signing. Areas intended for common use, such as shared access, reciprocal parking, or pedestrian plazas shall also be identified. In addition, a statement of architectural intent and/or conceptual elevations shall be submitted to indicate how the architectural concepts including style, form, bulk, height, orientation, and materials relate to other buildings or projects within the planning area as well as to the overall design goal for Haven Avenue. The Master Plan boundaries indicated in Figure 17.30.080-B are logical planning boundaries based upon physical constraints and property ownership. These boundaries may be modified when it is determined that the Master Plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The City Planner may require master planning of property outside the Overlay District, 17.30-55 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 adjacent to a project proposal, where necessary to assure integrated development and promote the goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. No parcel map or subdivision map shall be accepted or approved without concurrent submittal and approval of a Master Plan to assure integrated development consistent with the goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Architecture within a Master Planned development shall have a compatible design style, with variation, in the building style, form, and materials in accordance with the architectural standards of the Overlay District. Lot Size. Minimum parcel size shall be 2 acres with a minimum parcel depth of 225 feet within a Master Plan development. A 300-foot minimum lot width shall also be required, consistent with the access control policies. The Planning Commission may waive these requirements when it is determined that the parcel is part of a Master Plan which is consistent with the intent and purpose of the Overlay District. All lots of record are allowed to develop according to the requirements of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Access. Vehicular access onto Haven Avenue shall be discouraged wherever suitable alternative access may be developed from other streets as determined through the Master Plan process. If vehicular access onto Haven Avenue is granted, said access shall be shared with adjacent parcels. The minimum distance between drive approaches shall be 300 feet with 100 feet being the minimum distance between a drive approach and the curb return of any intersection along Haven Avenue. Also, reciprocal parking and access easements shall be required, where appropriate, with any development proposal. Public transit facilities shall be considered within all Master Plans. Convenient pedestrian access shall be provided to designated transit facilities, such as bus stops. On-site circulation for both pedestrians and vehicles shall consider existing or planned circulation patterns on adjacent properties. Connections shall be made, where appropriate, to foster more integrated development and enhance pedestrian movement. Site Orientation. The following standards are intended to promote integrated, pedestrian- oriented, office park development in a campus-like setting: Pedestrian Orientation. Site planning, including building configuration and placement, must create opportunities for courtyards and plazas and other landscaped open spaces and promote safe and convenient pedestrian movement with continuous landscaped pathways between buildings. Parking areas and circulation aisles along the Haven Avenue street frontage are discouraged and may only be approved through the Master Plan process when it is determined appropriate and necessary to implement the design goal of the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Their visual impact shall be fully mitigated through dispersed parking areas and extensive landscaping and berming. 17.30~56 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 Vehicular circulation around the rear and side portions of a site is encouraged. Circulation aisles which fragment or disrupt the connection of pedestrian spaces throughout a project shall be avoided to the extent possible. Parking. The use of dispersed parking areas which provide convenient access to buildings without interrupting interior pedestrian spaces is encouraged to reduce the need for large parking lots. Where large parking lots are necessary, they shall be located in areas Jess visible from Haven Avenue and their visual impact fully mitigated with building placement and extensive landscaping and berming. e. On-street parking along Haven Avenue shall be prohibited. 17.30-57 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-B MASTER PLAN AREAS Revised 411192 D MASTER PLAN AREAS CIRCULATION ~ 12o' ~c).vL · ..m... 100' FLO. W. 88' or less FLO.W. RAIL SERVICE ~ Ext~tlng +'+'+++' Propped TRAILS/ROUTES Peclestrlen Blcyc:;le Regionel Multi-Uee Speclel Streetscape/ Lendstaping Power Llae/ Utility I=lll;iklnt Creekl & Chenne~ Bridge '-)' Access Pointe :_~ 1perk <~ Fire Station 5 '1 0 4O _ FOO?H!LL - Acres 17, 30-58 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 Building placement at or' near the streetscape building setback is strongly encouraged within all developments, particularly on corner lots with high visibility. Multiple building placement should provide variable streetscape setbacks to reduce streetscape monotony. Setbacks. A 45-foot average landscape setback and a minimum 45-foot building setback shall be required along Haven Avenue, as measured from the ultimate face of curb, including existing lots of record and condominium lots or lots within a center when designed as an integral part of a Master Planned development. Ancillary service and loading areas shall be designed and located where least visible from public view and adjacent properties designated "Industrial Park." All existing and new utilities, including electrical services less than 34.5 kv, within the project shall be installed underground. Landscaping Requirements. The intent of the following standards is to enhance the visual quality of the streetscape and provide an attractive and pleasant working environment in a campus-like setting. Minimum Landscape Coverage. A minimum 25 percent of net lot area (excludes right-of-way dedications and private streets) shall be landscaped areas and pedestrian hardscape plazas and courtyards. The landscape/hardscape coverage requirement may be modified for individual parcels within master planned developments when it is determined that the master plan, as a whole, meets the required coverage and the project is consistent with the intent and purposes of the design goal for Haven Avenue. A maximum 5 percent credit toward the required landscape/hardscape coverage may be permitted where appropriate public art is to be displayed in a setting which enhances pedestrian spaces and building architecture. A consistent streetscape design theme shall be developed along the Haven Avenue streetscape which incorporates intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, alluvial rockscape, mounding, meandering sidewalks, and appropriate street furniture. Landscaping materials shall be selected which provide an historic link to the City's past, such as Eucalyptus windrows, citrus trees, and grape vines. In addition, a program of street name monument signs shall be developed to include low profile, natural alluvial rock monument signs with individual letters formed in a sandblasted concrete face.. .Berming. Landscaping and berming shall be designed to create visual interest and variety to the streetscape; enhance building architecture; screen utilities; buffer views of automobiles, pavement, and service areas; and define and distinguish the pedestrian environment from vehicular spaces. 17.30-59 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 Water Conservation. A combination of water-conserving landscape and irrigation techniques are required such as the use of drought tolerant plant species and hardscape (non- irrigated) surfaces, and special irrigation systems such as drip emitters, low volume stream rotors, deep watering of trees and shrubs, tensiometers to measure soil moisture, and automatic timers. g. Landscape materials shall be selected for their low maintenance, drought tolerance, and heat and wind tolerance. Open Space and Pedestrian Environment. The intent of this section is to promote the functional design and location of pedestrian spaces, and provide convenient pedestrian circulation on- and off-site and promote a campus-like setting. The development of a pedestrian node or focal point, such as a plaza or courtyard is required within all projects. The location of plazas and courtyards should encourage maximum pedestrian use and be separated and/or buffered from vehicular parking and circulation. Such locations may be near a prominent building entrance or along a centralized pedestrian path. Pedestrian Facilities. Pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall be designed to create an attractive, comfortable, and functional setting with a "sense of place." A combination of the following design elements are encouraged, but are not limited to: pavement or surface texture; elevation/grade changes; use of landscape materials and structures to provide shade and define enclosed spaces; seating (e.g., benches, steps, or raised planters); and outdoor eating areas. In addition, the use of water features, covered walkways, kiosks and public art are encouraged. Trash receptacles, drinking fountains, light standards, and other street furniture shall be designed to enhance the appearance and function of open space areas. Convenient pedestrian circulation shall be provided throughout all projects to connect parking areas and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open spaces. 10. Architecture. The following standards are intended to promote a high-quality office park image with high prestige identity.. Urban Style. Desirable architecture along Haven Avenue shall project a high-quality, progressive, sophisticated, and urban style of development. While the use of a variety of exterior materials may be permitted to achieve this image; Spanish, Mediterranean, or traditional architecture styles are not generally considered appropriate for office buildings. Variations in architectural styles, construction methods, and materials for certain ancillary uses, such as restaurants and banks, may be permitted where the architecture is exemplary and consistent with the high quality image required for 17,,30-60 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 Haven Avenue and where a particular design is necessary and more appropriate considering the intended use of the building. Multiple Story. Multiple story buildings of sufficient mass are encouraged if they reflect the scale and proportion of the Haven Avenue right-of-way and streetscape setbacks. Low linear buildings are discouraged. Building design elements that are considered inappropriate for an office park atmosphere include retail type storefront elevations (linear configurations, continuous ground floor glazing, multiple doorways), and numerous overhead roll- up doors which promote concentrations of ancillary commercial and business support services, and are therefore prohibited. Service and loading areas shall be screened from public view and adjoining properties, wherever possible, to reduce site design constraints on future adjacent development. The design of loading doors shall be consistent with office architectural design features. All building equipment must be housed within the building or below finished grade. All equipment screening must be architecturally integrated into the overall office building design. Architectural Varietv. Within the Overlay' District, all building features must exhibit an office style architecture regardless of the type of accessory/ancillary uses or equipment contained within the building or on the site. Architectural planes shall have variation in depth and angle to create variety and interest in the basic form and silhouette of the building. Articulation of the elevation surfaces is encouraged through the use of openings and recesses which create. texture and shadow patterns and provide variety in the building plane or surface. Building entrances shall be well articulated and project a formal entrance statement through variation of architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and landscaped plazas. Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjunction with variation in the major form-giving elements of a structure. Signs. A coordinated Uniform Sign Program shall be required for any development, including wall and rnonument signs. Building wall signs shall cons[st of individual letters and canned signs are prohibited. The size, number, typical design, and location of the signs, as permitted by the City's Sign Ordinance, shall be submitted with the development application and be reviewed concurrently. 11. Urban Centers. The following standards are intended to promote the highest quality development and intensity to create community focal points or "urban centers" near the key intersections of 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. The applicability of these urban center standards for specific parcels shall be determined through the Master Plan review process. 17.30-61 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 Multiple story buildings shall be of the highest design quality, particularly at the immediate corners of 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard. Desirable structural components include steel and concrete in conjunction with curtain walls, spandrels, and glass. Wood frame structures are discouraged. A minimum 30 percent of net lot area (excludes right-of-way dedications and private streets) shall be landscaped areas and pedestrian hardscape plazas or courtyards. Special landscaping and streetscape design features shall be developed for the intersections at 4th Street and Foothill Boulevard to create an intensive and prestigious gateway entry into Rancho Cucamonga and the Haven Avenue Corridor. The use of parking structures is encouraged to promote intensified development and maximize the site area devoted to urban pedestrian plazas and courtyards. Parking structures shall be harmoniously designed with the main building and located around the rear or side portions of the site. The minimum parcel size shall be 5 acres unless waived by the Planning Commission when it is determined that the parcel is designed as an integral part of a master planned development consistent with the intent and purpose of the Overlay District. 17.30-62 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code FIGURE 17.30.080-C Section 17.30.080 $U AF EA Revised: 4/1/92 ~ I .:ilk 120' R.O.W. 100' R.O.W. 85' or less R.O.W. RAIL SERVICE I I I ! I Existing il II I I I I Proposed TRAILS/ROUTES 0 0 0 '0 Pedestrian ~- · ~ Creeks & Chcnnels .eeee $~ycic ~:Jl::~['"'l Regional ~ Park1 I I BHd9e ~ ~ n ~" S~I Streetscape/ ~ La~scaPin9 Access 0 400' 800' 1600' Note: Parcel Unes end Iof configurations are shown as sppcoxlmeticn only. 1The sites chows stay not be currently owned nor ic the location site speeffic. The depiction of c cite is an Indication of s pro~ected future need that may be die!ted over thlte is the City develops. 17,30-63 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 B. Subarea 1. 1. Land Use Designation: General Industrial. Primary Function: The long-range plan for this subarea is to maintain its function primarily as a community-serving industrial area, consisting of light manufacturing, warehousing, and other General Industrial group uses. Surrounded by residential uses to the north, east, and south, the subarea contains a few existing industrial uses which occupy approximately 25 acres. The subarea is also traversed by the Cucamonga Creek Flood Control Channel. While the subarea is directly accessible to the rail line and the Ontario International Airport via Vineyard Avenue, the uses that exist today are not particularly dependent upon these transportation modes. 3. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. 4. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 100-foot Right-of-Way - Arrow Route. 72 ft. 14': 1OO ft. ROW 17.30-64 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 88-foot Right-of-Way - Vineyard Avenue. 12~ 66-foot Right-of-Way - Baker Street. 44 ft. 66 ft. 'ROW o Special Considerations: Properties adjacent to residential areas shall have minimum 45-foot building setbacks from the property line on interior lot lines abutting residential districts and 45 feet from the ultimate face of curbs on abutting streets abutting residential districts. The minimum front parking setback shall be 35 feet for such parcels. In areas which abut residential uses, screening of industrial buildings, parking, storage, and equipment areas is required through the use of walls, fences, and/or herres. The screening, in conjunction with the streetscape setback and landscaping, witl soften the edge of the industrial development and provide an attractive design element. Screen wall/fence height shall not exceed 3 feet inside the 40-foot parking setback. In areas abutting residential uses, access via internal circulation in place of residential streets is encouraged, when feasible, in order to minimize impacts upon existing residential, vehicular, and pedestrian circulation patterns. Although the right-of-way on 8th Street, west of Vineyard Avenue is greater than 54 feet, the local street setbacks for buildings and parking shall apply. However, considering the shallow depth of the property on the north side of 8th Street, the average depth of streetscape landscaping required shall be determined during the Technical/Design Review process. 17,30-65 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code FIGURE 17.30.080-D Section 17.30.080 $UBAR A 2' Revised: 4/1/G2 CIRCULATION 120' RoO.W. 100' R.O.W. 85' o~ I~ss R.O.W. I t I I I Existing I I I I I I t I PTolo~$ed Note: TRAiLS/ROUTES 0 0 0 0 Pedett,lnn ~1~, M~t~U~ ~ I 0 400' .800' 1600' Parcel lines End lot emlfig~rltJons are shown Is approximation only. /The Mlaa ~hown amy not I~ currently owned nor I~ t~ ~a~ ~fie s~olfio. The ~ti~ of m site Is an ~l~ of a ~t~ fut~ ~ed that may ~ ~sted ~r t~ as h ~ty ~s. 17.30-66 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code C. Subarea 2. 2. Section 17.30.080 Land Use Designation: General Industrial. Primary Function: The long-range plan for this subarea is to strengthen its manufacturing and warehousing activities, complemented by rail access. Portions of this subarea have lead/spur rail lines proposed to accommodate the rail service needs of industrial users. It is the City's policy to encourage the development of rail service facilities on parcels with strong rail development potential. Standards have been established as a part of Section 17.30.040. F which require the rail service development of all parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines. Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 100-foot Right-of-Way - Arrow Route. '14' 72 ft. IO0 ft. ROW 17.30-67 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 88-foot Right-of-Way - Vineyard and Hellman Avenues. Section 17.30.080 64 ft. 88 ft. ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - 9th Street and other local streets. 1'1~--% 22" 1 22' (--11~ 44 ft. 66 ft. ROW Special Considerations: Parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur lines as indicated on the subarea map are required to be developed in accordance with Rail Service Standards (Section 17.30.040.F). Properties adjacent to residential areas shall have a minimum 45-foot building setback from the property line on interior lot lines abutting residential districts and 45 feet from the ultimate face of curbs on streets abutting residential districts. The minimum front parking setback shall be 35 feet for such parcels. In areas which abut residential uses, screening of industrial buildings, parking, storage, and equipment areas is required through the use of walls, fences, and/or berms. The screening, in conjunction with the streetscape setback and landscaping, will soften the edge of the industrial development and provide an attractive design element. Screen wall/fence height shall not exceed 3 feet inside the 40-foot parking setback. In areas abutting residential uses, access via internal circulation in place of residential streets is encouraged, when feasible, in order to minimize impacts upon existing residential, vehicular, and pedestrian circulation patterns. 17.30-68 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code FIGURE 17.30.080-E Section 17.30.080 ~ ~ftVll lllIIIFi~ IF qlu, 'qln ~11HIIR~IIla4: IIIJII44~I~14~ Z .I ..J IAI RsvIsed 4/1/92 Ill!1//!l t!!lJi ................. Ilnil ']~('ROW 7th 0 2000' 4000' Note: Parcel llnee end lot configurations ore shown ee epproxlrrmtlons only. '~The sites shown may not be currently owned nor Is the location site specific. The depiction o1 i site is an Indication el a projected future need that may be adjusted over time Is the City develops. 17,,30-69 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 D. Subarea 3. 1. Land Use Designation: General Industrial. Primarv Function: The long-range plan for this subarea is to protect and enhance the viability of the existing industrial uses by eliminating conflicting land uses and improving land use transitions. Its primary function is to remain as General Industrial. Surrounded by residential uses to the north and south, and by the North Town neighborhood and an elementary school on the east, Subarea 3 contains a mixture of land uses including industrial, commercial, and residential. The existing industrial~ uses include some of the older establishments such as a lumberyard and metal forging shops, etc., as well as more recent light manufacturing and office uses along Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Older residential uses still remain on the southern side of the Metrolink rail line. A small convenience store is located on Archibald Avenue near the railroad track. 3. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. 4. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 100-foot Right-of-Way - Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. 18' 112'112'112'I 18' 72 ft. 100 ft. ROW 17.30-70 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 88-foot Right-of-Way - Hellman Avenue and 7th Street. Section 17.30.080 64 ft. .88 ft. ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - 9th Street and other local streets. '66 22? ] 22' ~--11i 44 ft. ft. ROW Special Considerations: At the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, the Cucamonga Business Park has the characteristics of the Industrial Park category and development shall be permitted to occur according to the Industrial Park land uses and standards, as shown in Subareas 6, 7, 12, and 16. Properties adjacent to residential areas shall have a minimum 45-foot building setback from the property line on interior lot lines abutting residential districts and 45 feet from the ultimate face of curbs on streets abutting residential districts. The minimum front parking setback shall be 35 feet for such parcels. In areas which abut residential uses, screening of industrial buildings, parking, storage, and equipment areas is required through the use of walls, fences, and/or berms. The screening, in conjunction with the streetscape setback and landscaping, will soften the edge of the industrial development and provide an attractive design element. Screen wall/fence height shall not exceed 3 feet inside the 40-foot parking setback. In areas abutting residential uses, access via internal circulation in place of residential streets is encouraged, when feasible, in order to minimize impacts upon existing residential, vehicular, and pedestrian circulation patterns. 17.30-71 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code FIGURE 17.30.080-F Section 17. 30. 080 120' R.O.W. 100' FLO.W. 88' OR LESS FLO. W. Revised 4}'1/92 RAIL. ~,ERVICE I I I I I EX~ST.~ ++.+++- PROP08~ TRAILS/ROUTES o o o o · 00. 0 94KE " ':"~'""~' SI~CtAL STRE~TSCAPE/ L&ND~CAFRNG POWER LINE/ UT!UTY EASEMENT '. ............... CREEKS & CHANNELS Note: Parcel lines and lot configurations are shown as approximations only. 1The sites shown may not be currently owned nor is the location site specific. The depiction of a site is an indication of a proiected future need that may be adjusted over time as the City develops. 17.30-72 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code E. Subarea 4. 1, Land Use Designation: General Industrial. 2. Section 17.30.080 Primary Function: The function of this area should be to provide for General Industrial development and space for support commercial users to the industrial area. The location of the area provides good access to the industrial area west of Haven Avenue and to vehicular traffic between the 1-10 Freeway and the existing residential areas. This subarea includes the smaller industrial units which front Archibald Avenue. These units are suitable for smaller commercial or industrial users. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 100-foot Right-of-Way - Archibald Avenue. I 72 ft. leo ft. ROW 88-foot Right-of-Way - 6th Street and 7th Street west of Archibald Avenue. Ill l f 12' 64 ft. 88 ft, ROW 1 Z30-73 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.30.080 66-foot Right-of-Way - 7th Street (east of Archibald Avenue) and all other 1ocat streets. 44 ft. · 66 ft. ROW Special Conditions: Properties adjacent to residential areas shall have a minimum 45- foot building setback from the property line on interior lot lines abutting residential districts and 45 feet from ultimate face of curbs on streets abutting residential districts. The minimum front parking setback shall be 35 feet for such parcels. In areas which abut residential uses, screening of industrial buildings, parking, storage, and equipment areas is required through the use of walls, fences, and/or berms. The screening, in conjunction with the streetscape setback and landscaping, will soften the edge of the industrial development and provide an attractive design element. Screen wall/fence height shall not exceed 3 feet inside the 40-foot parking setback.. In areas abutting residential uses, access via internal circulation in place of residential streets is encouraged, when feasible, in order to minimize impacts upon existing residential, vehicular, and pedestrian circulation patterns. 17.30-74 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-G Reviled I I t~e' II.0,W, tl;~::EXE~T1NO TRAI~/ROUTES I J 0000 ~ r'~~ 0 0 0 iCYCLE "~ N~:F. SS POETS IAIdDSC&P!~ U~JTY EASEMENT/ ¢ 9,HERF~ STAI"K~N Note: Pitoil final end lot oonflgurotlonl Me Ihovm II lpproxlmlUon$ only. 1The aries ihown my not b~ ourron~y owned nor II the location site Spoolfie. 'The deldotlon o1 a alto'lB an Indlcltlon of a prow fulure need that my b4 Idluotad over time OS the City daYMOpS. 17,,30-75 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 F. Subarea 5. 1. Land Use Desiqnation: General Industrial. Primarv Function: The area has railroad access and is substantially developed with many users having rail access. Where possible, future users should be functionally served by rail uses as this subarea is primarily for manufacturing and warehousing activities. It is the City's policy to encourage the development of rail service facilities on parcels with strong rail development potent[ah Standards have been established as a part of Section 17.30.040.F, which require rail service development of all parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines. 3. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. 4. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 120-foot Right-of-Way - 4th Street. 13' 94 ft. 120 ft, ROW 13' 17.30-76 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga 100-foot Right-of-Way - Archibald Avenue. Section 17.30.080 18' 11=11=112'[ 72 ft. 100 ft. ROW ..:~,'~. 18' 14': 88-foot Right-of-Way - 6th Street and Hermosa Avenue. 12~ 64 ft. 88 ft, ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - 7th Street, 8th Street, Center Avenue, and all other local streets. 22? I 22" (.'-11' 44 ft. ft. 'ROW 17.30-77 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 Special Considerations: Parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines, as indicated on the subarea map, are required to be developed in accordance with Rail Service Standards (Section 17.30.040.F). Properties adjacent to residential areas shall have a minimum 45-foot building setback from the property line on interior lot lines abutting residential districts and 45 feet from ultimate face of curbs on streets abutting residential districts. Minimum front parking setback shall be 35 feet for such parcels. In areas which abut residential uses, screening of industrial buildings, parking, storage, and equipment areas is required through the use of walls, fences, and/or berms. The screening, in conjunction with the streetscape setback and landscaping, will soften the edge of the industrial development and provide an attractive design element. Screen wall/fence height shall not exceed 3 feet inside the 40-foot parking setback. In areas abutting residential uses, access via internal circulation in place of residential streets is encouraged, when feasible, in order to minimize impact upon existing residential, vehicular, and pedestrian circulation patterns. 17r, 30--78 6/99 City of Rancho Cucarnonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-H Revised ClI~TION ~ 1~o' FLO.W. ~ tOO' KO.W. amBI~m, I~' O~ LESS KO.W. RA~ 8E~E 0 0 0 0 ~T~ ~ S~T~ ~ L~ AC~ ~S 0 400~ &l Note: Parcel Iine~ ind lot configurefionI am shown ss Ipproxlmetions only, lhe eltea shown rely not be currently owned nor le the location o)te $pecl~c. The depiction of t elte teen indication of · projected future need thet may be adjusted over t~me as the City develope. I'll I 1 17.30-79 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 G. Subarea 6. 1. Land Use Desi(lnation: Industrial Park. Primary Function: The function of this area is to provide for office development and support administrative services for industrial-related activities. Development in this subarea will provide for the high-quality character associated with "Office Park" type development. Haven Avenue serves as a major access and gateway to the City. 3. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. 4. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 120-foot Right-of-Way - Haven Avenue, 4th Street, and 6th Street (east of Haven Avenue). A median will be constructed to limit left turn movements from Haven Avenue directly onto properties in Subarea 6. 17.30-8O 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 100-foot Right-of-Way - Arrow Route. 72 ft. 100 ft. ROW 88-foot Right-of-Way - 6th Street (west of Haven Avenue) and Jersey Boulevard. 64 ft. 88 ft. ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - 7th Street, 8th Street, 9th Street, Center Avenue, and all other local streets. 66 ft. 'FLOW Special Consideration: For property within the boundaries of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, refer to Section 17.30.050.A for a modified list of permitted land uses and special development criteria. 17,30-81 6/99 City of Rancho Cuc'amonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-1 illll NgXI', 17.30-82 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 H. Subarea 7. 1. Land Use Designation: Industrial Park. Primary Function: Subarea 7 occupies an area directly south of Foothill Boulevard which represents an important land use edge between the City's Industrial area and a large master planned community to the north. Foothill Boulevard isthe City's primary commercial corridor and serves as a gateway to the City. Along Foothill Boulevard, the intersections at Haven, Milliken, and Rochester Avenues have been designated as activity centers to promote concentrated activity and establish a unique design theme. 3. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections and along Foothill Boulevard. 120-foot Right-of-Way - Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, and Day Creek Boulevard. A median will be constructed to limit left turn movements from Haven Avenue, Foothill Boulevard, and Milliken Avenue directly onto properties in Subarea 7. 94 f,t. 120 ft. ROW 13' 17.30-83 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 100-foot Right-of-Way - Arrow Route (no median on Arrow Route), Rochester Avenue, and Etiwanda Avenue. 12112'[ 18' 72 ft. 100 ft. ROW 88-foot Right-of-Way - Cleveland Avenue. 12~ 64 ft. 88 ft. ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - all local streets. 11~--~ 22" 1 22; (.-11' 44 ft. 66 ft. ROW 17.30-84 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 Special Considerations: Foothill Boulevard is a major arterial which is projected to carry a significant volume of traffic. In order to limit vehicular access problems, the minimum parcel size requirement along Foothill Boulevard is 2 acres and the minimum parcel width is 200 feet. Additional Foothill Boulevard design standards and guidelines are provided in Section 17.30.060. For property within the boundaries of the Haven Avenue Overlay District, refer to Section 17~30.080.A for a modified list of permitted land uses and special development criteria. The San Bernardino County Law and Justice Center, at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Civic Center Drive (adjacent to the Civic Center), includes a detention facility since municipal court facilities are provided. On the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Arrow Route, Development Code provisions for the General Commercial district shall apply to the anchor store and the adjoining northerly building. Development and use of satellite buildings in the Center are subject to provisions of this chapter. At the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, adjoining the Rancho Cucamonga Adult Sports Park and Rancho Cucamonga Stadium, uses allowed in the Recreational Commercial General Plan Land Use category shall be permitted within the planned 27-acre Mixed Use Center. To preserve and enhance the image of the community, special considerations shall be given to the quality of site design, architecture, and landscaping of all properties adjacent to the I-15 Freeway. Attractive screening of outdoor work, loading, and storage areas and roof- and ground-mounted equipment from significant freeway points-of-view shall be required. On the south side of Foothill Boulevard, a Community Commercial Retail Center is Conditionally Permitted subject to a Master Plan on a 14.45 acre parcel bounded by Spruce Avenue on the west, Elm Avenue on the east, and Eucalyptus Street on the south. This site is a logical extension of the Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Activity Center which encourages a mix of uses to function as an active people place and be lively well into the night for the residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Compatibility with adjacent existing and intended Industrial Park development shall be demonstrated through site planning, building design, and landscaping. All retail business uses permitted in the Terra Vista Community Commercial designation are permitted within the Center and are incorporated by reference. A Master Sign Program shall be required and shall be consisten,t with sign code requirements for Commercial Retail centers. 17.30-85 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-J ! II !i 17.30-86 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga I. Subarea 8. 1. 2. Section 17.30.080 Land Use Designation: General Industrial. Primary Function: This area functions to provide for General Industrial activities and to assure for a transition area from the Heavy Industrial category located to the south of this subarea. North of Arrow Route and west of Milliken Avenue, the industrial uses should be allowed to continue and expand with all service according to the development standards of the plan. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 120-foot Right-of-Way - Day Creek Boulevard and Milliken Avenue. 17.30-87 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 100-foot Right-of-Way - Arrow Route (no median on Arrow Route), Etiwanda Avenue, and Rochester Avenue. 72 ft. 100 ft. ROW 88-foot Right-of-Way - Jersey Boulevard. 64 ft. 88 ft. ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - All other local streets. 1 22' 44 ft. ¸66 f---1 1' ft. 'ROW 17.30-88 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 Special Considerations: Because of the potential conflicts between uses within this subarea and the uses within the Industrial Park category of adjacent Subareas 6 & 7, building setbacks from abutting property for Medium Manufacturing and greater intensity shall be no less than 45 feet. Class C Performance Standards for the adjoining Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial area (Subarea 9), allow existing businesses and future Industrial uses which produce noise, particulate matter and air contaminants, vibration, odor, humidity, heat, glare, or high intensity. Uses sensitive to these conditions, such as precision manufacturing or office projects, should consider these factors prior to locating in the vicinity of Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial property. Both the potential park site location and fire station location are shown to indicate approximate location. Development within 600 feet of the 1-15 Freeway shall have outdoor storage areas completely screened from view along the freeway. Because of the existing rail service, users with rail service needs are permitted within the area west of Milliken Avenue. To preserve and enhance the image of the community, special considerations shall be given to the quality of site design, architecture, and landscaping of all properties adjacent to the I-15 Freeway. Attractive screening of outdoor work, loading, and storage areas and roof- and ground-mounted equipment from significant freeway points of view shall be required. 17.30-89 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga FIGURE 17.30.080-K 0 Section 17.30.080 17.30-90 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 J. Subarea 9. 1. Land Use Desiqnation: Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial. Primary Function: The function of this subarea is to provide for the continuation of existing uses and to provide an opportunity for the expansion of manufacturing and warehousing activity similar and compatible with the existing uses. This subarea extends from Arrow Route south to the Metrolink rail line, east of Haven Avenue, and west of the I-15 Freeway, including industrial users south of the Metrolink tracks and west of the I-15 Freeway. This subarea is traversed by the main Metrolink rail line on the south with several rail spurs. Substantial portions of the area around Jersey Boulevard are developed with Medium and some Heavy Industrial users. It is the City's policy to encourage the development of rail service facilities on parcels with strong rail development potential. Standards are provided in Section 17.30.080.F, which require rail service development on all parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines. 3. Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. 4. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 120-foot Right-of-Way - Milliken Avenue. ft. 120 ft. ROW 17.30-91 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 100-foot Right-of-Way - Rochester Avenue and Arrow Route (no median on Arrow Route). 18' 11'112;112'I 18' 72 ft. 14- 100 ft. ROW 88-foot Right-of-Way - Cleveland Avenue and Jersey Boulevard. 64 ft. 88 ft. ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - 7th Street, Vincent Avenue, Utica Avenue, and all other local streets. 11~.-~ 22" ] 22' i,--11~ 44 ft. 66 ft. ROW 17.3O-92 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 Special Considerations: Parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines as indicated on the subarea map are required to be developed in accordance with the Rail Service Standards (Section 17.30.040.F). To preserve and enhance the view of the community to travelers, special considerations shall be given to the quality of the site design, architecture, and landscaping of all properties adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway. Attractive screening of outdoor work, loading, and storage areas and roof- and ground-mounted equipment from significant freeway points-of-view shall be required. Outdoor storage within 600 feet of the 1-15 Freeway is discouraged; however, where necessary, it shall be completely screened from view along the freeway. To mitigate potential land use conflicts, new development within this subarea abutting Subareas 6 and 7 (Industrial Park category) shall provide a minimum 45-foot building setback to the abutting property line on interior lot lines abutting residential districts and 45 feet from ultimate face of curb on abutting streets. 17.30-93 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-L 17,30-94 6/99 City of Rancho Cucarnonga K. Subarea 10. Section 17.30.080 Land Use Designation: General Industrial. Primary Function: This subarea has direct access to rail service and should serve to locate distribution facilities in need of rail service. It is the City's policy to encourage the development of rail service facilities on parcels with strong rail development potential. Standards have been established which require rail service development on all parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines. Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 120-foot Right-of-Way- Milliken Avenue. ~~ ?.'.:'." "'"' : ~:.,.~: ,...., :; ;2: ~;',~;:~}~ ~,,,~,,'l,n,~ I:::;:.= ~,'.'?'.':J~ ""'" 94 ft. 120 ft. ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - 7th Street and all other local streets. 44 ft. 66 ft. 'ROW Special Consideration: Parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines as indicated on the subarea map are required to be developed in accordance with the Rail Service Standards (Section 17.30.040-F). 17.30-95 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-M 17.30-96 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga L. Subarea 11. 1. 2. Section 17.30.080 Land Use Designation: General Industrial. Primary Function: This area should provide for Light and Medium Manufacturing and Distribution activities. Rail-served activities would be permitted north of 6th Street. This area serves as a transition from the Industrial Park activities to the greater range of industrial use in both the General and Heavy Industrial land use categories. Approved projects for the area provide for .light industrial and warehouse distribution facilities. Portions of the subarea have lead/spur rail lines to accommodate the rail service needs of industrial uses. It is the City's policy to encourage the development of rail service facilities on parcels with strong rail development potential. Standards have been established which require rail service development on all parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur raill lines. Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 120-foot Right-of-Way -6th Street and Milliken Avenue. ."2. :, ~.:;.:.~. ,,-?: '.:;....!' :;: ,,. :, I !,,'1 I,,'!,,'l,,' 1~' 11~ 11' 14' 94,ft. 120 ft. ROW 17.30-97 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 66-foot Right-of-Way - 7th Street (east of Buffalo Avenue), Cleveland Avenue, Utica Avenue, and all other local streets. 44 ft. 66 ft. 'ROW Soecial Considerations: Parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines as indicated on the subarea map are required to be developed in accordance with the Rail Service Standards (Section 17.30.040. F). Rail-served industrial activities may occur within the area north of 6th Street and shall be of a character that is compatible with surrounding land uses along the 6th Street frontage. 17.30-98 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-N sub&tel. Revised 4t 1/92 '120' R.O.W.' 100'R.O.W. ' 88' Or I~IR.O.W. Exiltlng IN,opoaed TRAff.$/ROUTE$ 0 0 0 0 Peclfmtrlan ' Multi-Ue.e I I F"""I mtdge · ,,~ A¢ceH Polnt~ 0 400~ 800~ "1600/ Note: Parcel fines and lot canflguratlone are shown as a ,pKo. xlmatlon only. a site is an kX~c J~on of · pmJee#d futwe need grot may be ,adJuete. d over time as the City div, i(~,... , 17.30-99 6~99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 M. Subarea 12. 1. Land Use Desianation: Industrial Park. Primary Function: This area will provide for a high-quality character for several entryways to the City. This area will also provide an opportunity for tourist-oriented uses such as hotels and motels which relate to airport activities. The subarea is located east of Milliken Avenue, west of the I-15 Freeway, north of 4th Street, and extends along MilLiken Avenue to 6th Street. 3. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. 4. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 120-foot Right-of-Way - 4th Street, 6th Street, and Milliken Avenue. '.:i~;...?~ .',,:,r: 11' 12' 17~ 18' 94 ft. 120 ft. ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - Charles Smith Avenue, Pittsburgh Avenue, and all other local streets. ¸66 22~ (--11' 44 ft. ft. 'ROW 17.30-100 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 Special Considerations: 'To preserve and enhance the image of the community, special consideration shall be given to the quality of site design, architecture, and landscaping of all properties adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway. Attractive screening of outdoor work, loading, and storage areas and roof- and ground-mounted equipment from significant freeway points of view shall be required. As an extension of retail sales now permitted as an ancillary use within a warehouse development, retait sales shall be permitted as a primary use for Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandise businesses within a Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandise Center. Said Centers shall be located within approximately 73 acres of land on the north side of Fourth Street between Milliken Avenue and the I-15 Freeway. A Master Plan, approved through the Conditional Use Permit process, shall be required for each Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandising Center. In addition to all uses permitted or conditionally permitted in Subarea 12, retail uses shall be permitted or conditionally permitted consistent with the General Commercial uses within the General Commercial district of Section 17.10.030. In the event of a conflict between whether a use is permitted or conditionally permitted, the Industrial Park requirement applies. However, added retail uses must offer Warehouse-Style Retail Merchandising as defined and incorporated into each Center's Master Plan. Further, a distinctive Warehouse Style-Retail Merchandising design vocabulary shall be developed for Fourth Street between Milliken Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway and incorporated into each Center's Master Plan. Compatibility with adjacent existing and intended Industrial Park and General industrial development shall be demonstrated through site planning, building design, and landscaping and incorporated into the Master Plan for each Center. 17.30-101 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-O Revised 4/1/92 Ilill ~116 IIIlllll ~ PEDESTRIAN S~C~AL STRF~mCAP~/ ~ LISE! ACCESS POINTS 1 PARK FI~E STATION ~HEHiFF ~TATION Note: Parcel lines and lot configurations are shown as approximations only. The sites shown may not be currenfiy owned nor is the location site specific. The depiction of a site is an indication of a projected future need that may be adjusted over time as the City develops. 0 400~ 800' 7th 17.30-102 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 N. Subarea 13. 1. Land Use Desiqnation: General Industrial. Primary Function: The function of this subarea is to provide for General Industrial development for those businesses which have business activities associated with the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial uses of Subarea 9. This subarea is located between Buffalo Avenue and the I..15 Freeway, south of existing industrial users by the Metrolink rail line, and extends to approximately 600 feet north of 4th Street. This area is adjacent to the I-15 Freeway and is subject to design considerations regarding views from the I-15 Freeway. Uses allowed are primarily Light and Medium Manufacturing. 3. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. 4. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 120-foot Right-of-Way - 6th Street (west of I-15 Freeway). 13' ' 94. f,t. 120 ft. ROW 13' 17.30-103 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 100-foot Right-of-Way - New Rochester Avenue. 18' !12112112'[ 72 ft. 18' 14~ 100 ft. ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - Charles Smith Avenue and all other local streets. _ ,'.',,'d~b,; ~=]',n',l=u [=nl r:: 44 ft. 66 ft. 'ROW Special Considerations: To preserve and enhance the image of the community, special consideration shall be given to the quality of the site design, architecture, and landscaping of all properties adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway. Attractive screening of outdoor work, loading, and storage areas and roof- and ground-mounted equipment from significant freeway points of view shall be required. All development in this area shall be required to completely screen any outdoor storage areas from public view on the 1-15 Freeway. Future considerations will be made for abandonment of a portion of the Rochester Avenue right-of-way. Future development between the Charles Smith Avenue right-of-way and the 1-15 Freeway will be limited because of the inherently small lot depth of parcels within this area. Important Note: Class C Performance Standards for the adjoining Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial area (Subarea 9) allow existing businesses and future industrial uses which produce noise, particulate matter and air contaminants, vibration, odor, humidity, heat, glare, or high intensity. Uses sensitive to these conditions, such as precision manufacturing or office projects, should consider these factors prior to locating in the vicinity of Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial property. 17.30-104 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-P 17.30-105 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga O. Subarea 14. Section 17.30.080 Land Use Designation: General Industrial. Priman/Function: This area is to serve the broadest range of industrial activities typically Light and Medium Manufacturing and Wholesale Distribution functions. This subarea provides a transition and buffer from the Heavy Industrial activity of Subarea 15. Special design considerations for storage area screening will be required along the I-15 Freeway Corridor. Portions of this subarea have lead/spur rail lines to accommodate the rail service needs of industrial uses. It is the City's policy to encourage the development of rail service facilities on parcels with strong rail development potential. Standards are provided in Section 17.30.040. F, which require rail service development on all parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 120-foot Right-of-Way - 4th Street. 94 f,t. 120 ft. ROW 17.30-106 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 100-foot Right-of-Way - Etiwanda Avenue (median only north of Arrow Route). 72 ft. 18' 14~ 100 ft. ROW 88-foot Right-of-Way - 7th Street. ~ ;,,,~ ~;*;,,~...~ ~ / , ,,',~ ';..~t~: ,p,: ~~' ~ " 84 ft, 88 ft, ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - Santa Anita Avenue and all other local streets. 44 66 ft. 22' /--1 ft. ROW 17.30-107 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 Special Considerations: To preserve and enhance the image of the community, special consideration shall be given to the quality of site design, architecture, and landscaping of all properties adjacent to the. 1-15 Freeway. Attractive screening of outdoor work, loading, and storage areas and roof- and ground-mounted equipment from significant freeway points of view shall be required. Uses within 600 feet of the 1-15 Freeway shall screen from view any outdoor storage areas from the freeway corridor. Parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur lines as indicated on the subarea map are required to be developed in accordance with Rail Service Standards provided in Section 17.30.040. F. 17.30-108 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-Q 'SUgAREA '~ '" J I! _ liJllllllll jJi 4th CIRCULATION FlAil. SElnVICE RevWec~4/~/92 TRAILS/ROUTES OOOO L_-J STA'I'TON ~ ~ STATION 0 4~ lOG' '1~00~ Note:Parcel lines and lot configurations are shown as approximations only The sites shown may not be currently owned nor is the lOCalion site specific. The depiction of a site is an indication of a projected future need 1hal may be adjusted over time as the City develops. 17.30-109 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 P. Subarea 15. 1. Land Use Designation: Heavy industrial. Primary Function: This area provides for the continuation and promotion of the heaviest of industrial users which would, by nature, be annoying to other less intense industrial activities. Subareas located south of Arrow Route, extending to the City boundary limits on the east, approximately 600 feet north of 4th Street, adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway, north of the Metrolink tracks, and along the utility easement south of Metrolink tracks, contain some of the City's heaviest industrial uses and along the southeast portion of this area, outside the City limits, is the former Kaiser Steel Plant. Portions of the subarea have lead/spur rail lines to accommodate the rail service needs of industrial users. It is the City's policy to encourage the development of rail service facilities on parcels with strong rail development potential. Standards are provided in Section 17.30.040-F, which require rail service development on all parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines. 3. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. 4. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 100-foot Right-of-Way - Arrow Route and Etiwanda Avenue (median only north of Arrow Route). 100 ft. ROW 18' 14~' 17,30-110 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga 88-foot Right-of-Way - 6th Street. Section 17.30.080 14'i 12~i' 12~112'J'14! 12' 64 ft. 88 ft. ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - Whittram Avenue and all other local streets. 11'--% 22? 1 22' (--11' 44 ft. 66 ft. 'ROW Special Considerations: Areas within 600 feet of the I-15 Freeway shall be required to completely screen outdoor storage areas from view along the 1-15 Freeway corridor. Heavy manufacturing users adiacent to Subareas 8 and 14 are required to have a minimum 100-foot building setback along abutting property lines. Where a rail service spur is necessary adjacent to the 6th Street frontage, its landscape setback may be maintained at no less than 20 feet from the ultimate face of curb, extending to the rail service right-of-way maintained outside the landscape setback. The landscaping within the area shal~ be designed in order to help screen loading activities. Parcels which adjoin existing or proposed lead/spur rail lines as indicated on the subarea map are required to be developed in accordance with Rail Service Standards provided in Section 17.30.040.F. Scrap operations shall be required to conform to the following standards: 17.30-111 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 .... Fences and Walls. All operations and storage, including all equipment used in such businesses, shall be within an enclosed building or within an area enclosed by a solid wall or solid view-obscuring fence. (1) All fences and walls shall be of a uniform height in relation to the ground upon which they stand and shall be a minimum of 8 feet and not exceed 16 feet in height. All yard gates shall be solid, view obscuring, and no less than 8 feet in height. (2) All fences and walls open to view from any public street shall be constructed of solid masonry. (3) All fences and walls shall be uniform in color and design and constructed in a workman-like manner. LandscaDinq. Dense trees shall be planted and maintained along side and rear property lines to aid in screening the yard area. 17.30-112 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-R .SUBARE[A Ravia®d: 11/20/95 4th * '" "~subaros 5 O ~ CIRCULATION RAIL SERVICE I~111 Ililllll 0 Note: TRAILS/ROUTES 120' R.O.W. 0 0 '0 '0 Pedestrian iMP'' *em~ 'Creeks & Channels 100' R.O.W. · · · · 8icyc¥ 88' or Jess R.O.W. !'-~[~ Regional Park1 Multi-Use Existing r""l ' Bridge ~&%,v'~ Special Streetscape/ A' ~ ~,q~ Landscaping Proposed .l~ Access Points _~) Master Plan 400' 800' 1600' P,urc~ol lines end lot configurations · ate Shown as approximation only. 1The sites shown may not be currently owned nor is the · location site 8pe~Hl~. The depiction of a site is an indication of a projected future need that may be adjusted over time as the City develops. 17.30-113 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 Q. Subarea 16. 1. Land Use DesiGnation: Industrial Park. Primary Function: This subarea serves as a transition zone from more intensive industrial or commercial activities to residential areas in the southwest comer of the City. As such, new development must be sensitive to the surroundings with appropriate architecture and site planning to mitigate potential conflicts. Land uses within the industrial area should be compatible with surrounding uses north of 6th Street and along Archibald Avenue to provide for use activities associated with airports such as tourist commercial. This subarea is adjacent to a direct access to the Ontario International Airport and is located at a gateway to the City. To the west and north are single family residential neighborhoods. 3. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. 4. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 100-foot Right-of-Way - Archibald Avenue and 4th Street. Future left turn movement directly onto property will be restricted in order to provide for future development of a median island with 4th Street. 72 ft. 100 ft. ROW 17.30-114 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 88-foot Right-of-Way - Hellman Avenue and 6th Street. II 12' 64 ft. 88 ft. ROW 66-foot Right-of-Way - All local streets. 44 ft. 66 ft. 'ROW Special Considerations: Because this subarea is located adjacent to residential development, property owners within 500 feet of the subarea shall be notified at the time of any development considerations. A revised conceptual Master Plan (revises the Master Plan of Development Review File No. 82-16) which outlines. access, circulation, drainage, and timing of improvements is required prior to approval of development plans. All new development must be consistent with this Master Plan or the appropriate revisions approved. Neighborhood Commercial uses (listed as "permitted" or "conditionally permitted" in Section 17.10.030) may only be considered within a 15-acre area at or near the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 6th Street, subject to approval of a master plan for those uses within a larger industrial park project. In the event of a conflict between whether a use is permitted or conditionally permitted, the Industrial Park requirement applies. It is not the intent to allow neighborhood commercial uses to be scattered throughout an industrial project nor to permit such uses within any existing complex designed solely for industrial uses. (Ord. 583, 8/97) Properties adjacent to residential areas shall have a minimum 45-foot building setback from property line on interior lot lines abutting residential districts and 45 feet from ultimate face of curbs on streets abutting residential districts. Minimum front parking setback shall be 35 feet for such parcels. 17.30-115 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 In areas which abut residential uses, screening of industrial buildings, parking, storage, and equipment areas is required through the use of walls, fences, and/or berms. The screening, in conjunction with the streetscape setback and landscaping, will soften the edge of the industrial development and provide an attractive design element. Screen wall/fence height shall not exceed 3 feet inside the 40-foot parking setback. In areas abutting residential uses, access via internal circulation in place of residential streets is encouraged, when feasible, in order to minimize impacts upon existing residential, vehicular, and pedestrian circulation patterns. To preserve and enhance the image of the community, special consideration shall be given to the quality of site design, architecture, and landscaping of all properties adjacent to the I-15 Freeway. Attractive screening of outdoor work, loading, and storage areas and roof- and ground-mounted equipment from significant residential and public right-of-way freeway points of view shall be required. Building height limit shall be 25 feet within 100 feet of abutting residentially designated property. No loading doors or facilities may face, unobstructed, towards any residentially designated property. No outdoor activities, storage, or mechanical equipment shall be located beyond the rear wall of any building that faces, unobstructed, towards any residentially designated property or public right-of-way. The remaining portion of Subarea 16, at the northwest comer of Archibald Avenue and 4th Street, created by adoption of Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 95-04, is authorized to have a 4th Street single property line frontage of less than 300 feet. No further reduction of the 4th Street property line is permitted, except for the acquisition of public right-of-way. 17.30-116 6/99 ' City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-S CIRCULATION I I~ R.O.W. millmama 100' : ; ; : : ~XJSTmG TRAILS/ROUTES 0 0 0 0 ~ C~EJ~KS & CHANNELS ~ 51'ATION 0 400; ]BOOr ~00f Note: Parcel fines and lot configuretic)ns.are ahown as epproxJmatlone only. The elm ahown may not be currently owned nor ta the location =it· apecific. The depiction of a mite 18 an indication of a projected future need that.. may be adjuetocl over time am the City dovetops. Rev[p, ed 1/111 ,miami 17.30-117 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 .... R. Subarea 17. 1. Land Use Designations: Industrial Park. Primary Function: This subarea serves as a transitional zone from more intensive industrial or commercial activities to residential areas. As such, new development must be sensitive to the surroundings with appropriate architecture and site planning to mitigate potential conflicts. Subarea 17 is located in three separate areas: the southeast corner of Baker and 9th Streets; the southeast comer of Archibald Avenue and Main Street; and the east side of Center Avenue, between Foothi~11 Boulevard and Church Street. 3. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 17.30.030-A. 4. Access and Circulation: Subject to modification, especially at intersections. 100-foot Right-of-Way - Archibald Avenue. :.-.?~?" , '14' 2112112'! 72 ft. 100 ft. ROW 18' 14' 66-foot Right-Of-Way - All other streets. 44 66 ft. ft. 'FLOW 17.30-118 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 Special Considerations: Properties adjacent to residential areas shall have a minimum 45-foot building setback from property line on interior lot lines abutting residential districts and 45 feet from ultimate face of curbs on streets abutting residential districts. Minimum front parking setback shall be 35 feet for such parcels. In areas which abut residential uses, screening of industrial buildings, parking, storage, and equipment areas is required through the use of walls, fences, and/or berms. The screening, in conjunction with the streetscape setback and landscaping, will soften the edge of the industrial development and provide an attractive design element. Screen wall/fence height shall not exceed 3 feet inside the 40-foot parking setback. In areas abutting residential uses, access via internal circulation in place of residential streets is encouraged, when feasible, in order to minimize impact upon existing residential, vehicular, and pedestrian circulation patterns. The portion of Subarea 17 located on the east side of Center Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and Church Street is unique because it is bounded on the north by a flood control basin and on the east by a flood control channel. The unusual shape of the area, as well as its proximityto residential areas, presents special site development constraints. In addition to those uses which are permitted or conditionally permitted within Subarea 17, Extensive Impact Utility Facilities may be permitted in this portion, subject to a Conditional Use Permit and the special site planning and design considerations described above. 17.30-119 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 FIGURE 17.30.080-T CIRCUt-&TION TRAIt R/~TES i i ~ ~flE~L $TREE31C~! !RAL 8ERVI~ u31LrrY I~.aamT/ ~ .a~.m~ STAT~O~ Reviled: 6/5/94 17.30-120 6/99 City of Rancho Cucamonga Section 17.30.080 S. Subarea 18. Land Use Desiclnation: General Dynamics Rancho Cucamonga - Specific Plan 93-01. Primary Function: The function of this subarea is to provide for mixed-use development oriented around an 18-hole golf course. This subarea is located south of the Metrolink tracks, west of Milliken Avenue, north of 4th Street, and east of Cleveland and Utica Avenues. The uses allowed and development standards are addressed in a separate document: the General Dynamics Rancho Cucamonga Subarea 18 Specific Plan. In the event of a conflict between the Industrial districts and the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan shall control. 17.30-121 6/99 CHAPTER 17.32 - FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DISTRICTS Section 17.32.010 - Purposes and General Plan Consistency .............. 17.32-1 Section 17.32.020 - Foothill Boulevard Districts .........................17.32-7 Section 17.32.030 - Use Regulations ................................ 17.32-10 Section 17.32.040 - Performance Standards .......................... 17.32-17 Section 17.32.050 - General Design Guidelines ........................ 17.32-17 Section 17.32.060 - Trip Reduction ................................. 17.32-49 Section 17.32.070 - Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines ................17.32-49 Section 17.32.080 - Subarea Development Standards .................. 17.32-56 Section 17.32.090- Implementation Strategies ........................ 17.32-93 Section 17.32.010 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code' CHAPTER 17.32 Foothill Boulevard Districts Section 17.32.010 - Purposes and General Plan Consistency The following objectives have been formulated for the Foothill Boulevard Districts for the implementation of the Goals and Objectives of the General Plan. Communitv Design Goal: Create a community design image that expresses and enhances the unique character and identity of Rancho Cucamonga. Obiectives Develop a streetscape system which reinforces the existing suburban parkways as vehicular areas and designates major street intersections as pedestrian activity center nodes throughout the corridor. Provide a system of vehicular gateway nodes which announce and identify entries into Rancho Cucamonga and achieve an overall positive identity for the area. Promote compatible building elevations which provide transition at pedestrian areas to higher elevations while protecting adjoining residential neighborhoods. Promote contemporary landscape treatments throughout the corridor particularly those that are low maintenance, drought resistant, and able to withstand high winds and intense urban conditions. Provide for the elimination of visually objectionable views such as outdoor storage and loading areas through the use of design guidelines. Policies Develop consistent streetscape and architectural palettes which are sensitive to creating a "heritage" statement for Foothill Boulevard. It is not the intent of this thematic overview to discourage innovative or contemporary architectural expressions or to imitate the architecture of the past, but to promote the harmonious coexistence of architectural styles varying from restoration to contemporary architectural themes. 17.32-1 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.010 Require compliance with the community design guidelines in plans for new development, expansion, or redevelopment and make community design a major consideration in site plan review and approval. Utilize landscape materials within the corridor which are clean, safe, wind resistant, and relatively low maintenance. Formal forms and configurations should be utilized at activity center nodes while less formal, suburban type configurations should be utilized throughout the parkway links in between. Develop an incentive program which rewards private sector development for providing certain "extra" design amenities within their developments. Of particular interest are solar-control devices such as bullding overhangs, awnings, and extra plantings in parking lot areas. Consideration should be given to special paving materials used in place of asphalt in vehicular areas. o Consider economic incentives for owners who wish to architecturally rehabilitate, refurbish, or upgrade landscaping on existing properties of significant cultural/historical heritage, but not for expansion. Designate special landscape and architectural features at major intersection locations to combine thematic plantings with complementary architectural statements designed to promote a distinctive thematic character for these activity center nodes. Changes in paving materials, plant materials, lighting, signing, and siting of adjacent structures should occur at major intersections to enhance their distinctiveness. Any buildings identified as architecturally significant such as the Thomas Brothers Winery or the Sycamore Inn should, where feasible and if necessary, be restored and integrated into adiacent development. Require development which is sensitive to significant natural landforms such as the hillside at the Sycamore Inn site (Red Hill). Land Use/Economic Goal: Create a Development Code which is sensitive to community land use and fiscal needs. Obiectives Maximize the economic position of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor commercial activities, capturing neighborhood and subregional demand. Promote distinctive, intense, commercial clusters which are sensitive to historical characteristics at key activity center nodes, such as those at the western entry to the City (Archibald Avenue at Vineyard Avenue and easterly from the I-15 Freeway intersection). Require master planning at key sites within the Foothill Boulevard study area to assure integrated development utilizing coordinated access, parking, building orientation/locations, pedestrian, and transit facilities. Employ a Mixed-Use Development Concept to reduce the number of larger vacant commercial properties and encourage infill development while providing opportunities for residential development. 17.32-2 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 5. Section 17. 32. O10 Ensure the gradual upgrading of under-utilized land uses functioning at less than their market potential. 6. Reconfigure elongated [)arcels and improve access to lots which are located in the easterly subareas of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Devise mechanisms for the physical upgrading of existing developments with recognized significant architectural and historic value. Policies 1. Establish regulations and provide incentive bonuses which promote pedestrian-oriented plazas; and encourage intensive commercial uses at key activity nodes along Foothill Boulevard. Prepare Development Regulations and Guidelines which simplifythe development review process. Establish regulations for rnixed use developments which assure proper land use mixture, minimum lot size, access restrictions, buffering, and master planning. Preserve historic retail commercial uses (i.e., Thomas Brothers, Sycamore Inn). Establish an incentive/bonus program of lot consolidation for small, shallow parcels along the corridor to encouragE; development into planned concentrations as opposed to a linear strip commercial configuration. Allow nonconforming uses to continue as per current City policies and regulations. Encourage the formation of new redevelopment programs to assist retail and service businesses with property improvements. Develop incentives to encourage specialty commercial clusters at key activity center nodes. Circulation Goal: Develop a circulation system which facilitates efficient and safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic and enhances the community design character along Foothill Boulevard. 17.32-3 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Obiectives Section 17.32.010 10. 11. 12. 13. 1. Limit vehicular access points on Foothill Boulevard. 2. Develop a mixture of land uses which reduce home/work trips within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and the City. 3. Provide for, and phase, necessary street improvements to maximize the efficiency of traffic along Foothill Boulevard. 4. Minimize vehicular through traffic on adjacent residential streets. 5. Encourage the use of local transit programs (shuttle bus) whenever possible. Policies 1. Provide pedestrian-oriented amenities and circulation features within key activity nodes by providing incentives to private development for pedestrian improvements. 2. Reduce inter-site vehicular trips onto Foothill Boulevard by requiring private developments to secure Reciprocal Access Agreements prior to development. 3. Provide for transit facilities along Foothill Boulevard at convenient pedestrian locations. 4. Allow shared parking and access to facilitate efficient parcel usage and to minimize traffic support facilities such as drives, parking spaces, etc. 5. Discourage new commercial and residential developments from taking any access from local residential streets by developing internal circulation systems which direct traffic away from surrounding residential neighborhoods. Designate selected residential streets within the planning area as local streets where conditions promote pedestrian movements over those of the automobile. Promote the installation of a raised median within Foothill Boulevard in order to ensure efficient and safe future traffic operations along Foothill Boulevard. Promote the realignment of San Bernardino Road and Red Hill Country Club Drive in order to improve traffic operations and sight distance. Promote the extension of Estacia Street, west of Klusman Avenue, in order to redirect traffic from San Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulevard. Discourage the future use of frontage roads along Foothill Boulevard. Promote existing City access policies as adopted by the Planning Commission for parcels located within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Establish intersection geometric standards which provide for acceptable levels of traffic operations. Promote the development of Malachite Avenue/Foothill Boulevard as a complete 4-way intersection serving properties north of Foothill Boulevard between Hellman and Klusman Avenues. 17.32 -4 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.010 Do Environmental Goal: Maintain the highest possible quality of environment within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor by balancing the impacts of development with environmental concerns. Obiectives Precisely locate that portion of the Red Hill Fault which lies within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and establish land use restrictions for areas adjacent to the fault. Establish regulations which preserve significant environmental features, such as mature trees and windrows, within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Policies Limit development within the 100-year flood areas as shown on the latest Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) or provide flood protection measures in accordance with the City's Flood Ordinance as approved by the City Engineer. Appropriate drainage facilities shall be provided for specific developments as approved by the City Engineer. 3. Precisely map that portion of the Red Hill Fault which traverses the planning area. Based upon projected traffic volumes, map future noise contours, and establish land use restrictions and/or noise attenuation conditions for areas within noise impacted areas. Require mapping of all significant on-site environmental features which are worthy or preservation. o For development within the Red Hill Fault area, require a detailed geotechnical study prior to project approval to determine the location, if present, of the fault, and any other limitations presented by geotechnical conditions. ¸, Through the project approval process, and the imposition of conditions or mitigation measures, ensure that alii development within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor will not result in a decrease in environmental quality and will, wherever possible, create a higher quality environment. 8. Require the enforcement of the existing City Tree Preservation Ordinance. Encourage developments, within the area impacted by noise, to provide sufficient noise attenuation to maintain acceptable exterior and interior CNEL noise levels as defined by Section 17.02.120 - Noise Abatement. Infrastructure Goal: Provide a high level of public services and facilities to all residents and businesses along Foothill Boulevard. Policies Require that all public services and facilities are available or that other financial arrangements have been instituted prior to the issuance of building permits. 17.32-5 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.010 Develop an implementation program for the improvement, phasing, and financing of infrastructure within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Monitor the utilization of public infrastructure systems and program improvements to ensure capacity for future planned development. Cultural and Historical Goal: Identify and preserve all cultural and historical resources within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Obiectives Make cultural and historical resources within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor known and accessible to the general public. Preserve and enhance existing cultural and historical resources and establish new land uses compatible with, and complementary to, these resources. Policies Encourage the development of superior design which, in time, will add to the City's architecturally significant/historic resources. 2. Establish land uses which complement existing cultural and historical features. 3. Establish a signage system to direct the general public to cultural and historical features. Develop a public information program to aid in the public awareness of cultural and historical resources within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Prior to project approval or the issuance of building permits, ensure that all existing cultural or historical resources worthy of preservation have been retained, salvaged, relocated, or otherwise protected from destruction. Cooperate with local historical societies and representatives of qualified archaeological organizations in the identification and management of identified and potentially historic resources within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Require new projects to incorporate existing cultural and historical structures/facilities into their designs. 1 '7.32-6 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.020 Section 17.32.020- Foothill Boulevard Districts The Foothill' Boulevard Districts are based upon the concept of dividing the corridor into four major subareas, all of which should be punctuated by higher intensity urban activity centers. Subareas were determined by various environmental features such as: topography, recent development patterns, architecture, blight, physical form, and circulation routes (Section 17.32.080 - Subarea Development Standards). The activity centers are designed as neighborhood/subarea focal points. For example Bear Gulch Village, which already contains a variety of quality sit-down restaurant uses, provides an overriding "restaurant row" theme which is unique to its subarea. Other subareas within the corridor also contain concentrations of unique land uses which foster the potential to create and strengthen higher intensity activity centers. Specific land uses within the corridor also contribute to the diversity of Foothill Boulevard. The corridor contains a variety of land uses ranging from higher intensity, commercial-oriented uses (such as convenience, specialty, and regional related commercial designations) to residential uses. Other land uses include office, light industrial, and public-oriented uses. Related to these land uses are their accompanying Subarea Development Standards (Section 17.32.080) which provide the necessary setbacks and landscaping to buffer the adjacent properties. The Foothill Boulevard Districts have been created for implementation of the Goals, Objectives, and Land Use Elements of the General Plan. Commercial. The Foothill Boulevard Corridor contains a variety of commercial facilities which are designed to promote diverse and unique shopping environments. The corridor contains a wide assemblage of commercial land use categories which range from tourist-oriented specialty uses to regional associated commercial uses. In general, the commercial land uses range in size and character, based upon their respective relationship to location, type, and intensity of use. Commercial land use categories include: Specialty Commercial (FB/SC). Specialty Commercial land use districts are designed to accommodate specialty uses, which promote a special landmark quality or create a special ambience, which is unique to a particular subarea. For example, specialty uses such as farmers markets, cafes, bakeries, gift shops, and other specialty theme-oriented uses located adjacent to the Thomas Brothers Winery, complement the existing winery structure and provide a unifying theme. Other specialty uses, such as the establishment of tourist-oriented specialty uses (sit-down restaurants and specialty shops), lend support t:o the establishment of a theme-oriented activity center which caters to visitors. Other specialty commercial activity centers include the Archibald Avenue and Vineyard Avenue intersections, all of which include uses designed to enhance the character of these respective subareas. A limited number of office uses have been included into the specialty commercial category in order to facilitate an interactive office/commercial environment. .Communitv commercial (FB/CC). This land use district includes a wide variety of uses which typically include drug stores, supermarkets, apparel shops, variety stores, and commercial recreation uses. tn general, Community Commercial districts function to promote the establishment of neighborhood/district level commercial foods and services. Typically, large community commercial complexes are designed to accommodate the needs of more than one neighborhood or subarea and include one or more major tenants accompanied by a variety of multi-tenant uses. Smaller, stand alone community 17.32-7 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.020 commercial facilities are also permitted within various CC districts, and are ~ocated on smaller existing parcels which are designed to accommodate small satellite land uses. So Reqional Related Commercial (FB/RRC). The Regional Related Commercial land use category is primarily designed to accommodate large, regional related commercial uses such as hotel/motel complexes, junior department stores, major appliance stores, commercial recreation uses, home improvement centers, major entertainment facilities, and other regional related commercial establishments. The intent of the Regional Related Commercial district is to cater to a veritable mix of uses which are designed to: a. Promote day- and night-time patronage; b. Complement its regional location adjacent to the I-15 Freeway Corridor; and c. Attract patrons from surrounding market areas. Residential. A variety of residential land uses are proposed within the corridor, with a predominance of these uses being located within higher intensity residential districts. Residential land uses range from Low Residential (FB/LR) districts, accommodating 2-4 dwelling units per acre, to Medium-High Residential (FB//vlHR) districts, encompassing 14-24 dwelling units per acre. The residential land use districts within the corridor are designed to provide a population/trade base for adjacent Commercial Activity Centers; provide unique and distinct urban-oriented residential envi,ronments; provide a variety of residential densities and housing product types; promote a mixed-use development concept in specified locations which integrates urban-oriented residential uses with commercial/office functions; and promote residential districts which are compatible with existing adjacent, residential neighborhoods. Low Residential (FB/LR). Low Residential land uses are characterized by a density of 2-4 dwelling units per acre of land and consist of residential product types which include single family detached residential structures. Low-Medium Residential {FB/LMR). Low-Medium Residential land uses are typically characterized by residential product types which include patio homes, duplexes, triplexes, and fourplax units. This land use district, located near the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, is intended to provide higher intensity residential uses designed to complement the Haven Avenue setting. Low-Medium Residential uses will be designed to remain compatible with existing,, surrounding single family residential land uses. Typically, Low-Medium Residential land uses are characterized by a density of 4-8 dwelling units per acre. 17.32-8 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.020 Medium Residential (FB/MR). Medium Residential Districts are designed to accommodate product types which are characterized by a density of 8-14 dwelling units per acre. In general, Medium Residential uses are associated with attached townhome units with enclosed garages coupled with common recreational amenities. Medium-High Residential (FB/MHR). Medium-High Residential Districts consist of densities which range between 14-24 dwelling units per acre. Medium-High Residential products are typically associated with attached apartments and condominium projects which are designed to exhibit urban qualities including reduced building setbacks, hardscape elements, an(~l common open space amenities. Office.. There are three types of office land use categories located within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor designed to provide varying levels of office-related services. These three Office land use districts include: Office, Commercial/Office, and Mixed Use. Office (FB/O) land use district is intended to accommodate professional/administrative office and personnel services as opposed to other commercial-oriented land uses. Typically, uses consist of executive, management, administrative, or clerical uses including the establishment of branch offices, data processing centers, and the provision of consultation establishments of a professional nature. Commercial/Office (FB/CO) land uses consist of activities which cater to business support and personal services. IJses typically include medical and health care clinics, travel agencies, insurance agencies, copy centers, and other similar land uses. Mixed Use (FB/MU) activities consist primarily of a mix of Medium Residential uses, coupled with the establishment of convenience-oriented sales and services. Typically, uses include Medium Residential land uses of 8-14 units per acre and neighborhood-oriented community commercial uses such as retail sales from the premises of frequently needed personal items (i.e., dry cleaning establishments, specialty markets, video rental outlets, cafes, sit-down restaurants, book/magazine stores, hair stylists, etc.). Each Mixed-Use/Retail site shall provide a master plan illustrating land use, site planning, circulation, access, and overall architectural and landscape architectural design concepts (see Section 17.32.030 - Use Regulations). Industrial (FB/LI). In general, the Industrial land use district is characterized by Light Industrial (LI) land uses which typically include light manufacturing, custom manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, and wholesaling coupled with limited office/administrative functions. Utility (FB/U). Quasi-public land uses are typically associated with public activities. Quasi- public land uses typically consist of civic functions such a public administrative offices, museums, libraries, and meetin!;] halls/neighborhood centers. Quasi-public activities are also associated with public utility administrative offices and functions. Public (FB/P). Public land uses are typically associated with public transportation facilities and rights of way. 17.32-9 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.030 Section 17.32.030 - Use Regulations Uses listed in Table 17.32.030-A shall be allowable in one or more of the Foothill Boulevard Districts as indicated in the columns beneath each district subarea. Where indicated with the letter "P," the use shall be a permitted use in that district. Where indicated with the letter "C," the use shall be a conditionally permitted use subject to the Conditional Use Permit process. In the event there is difficulty in categorizing a given use in one of the districts, the procedure outlined in Section 17.02.040 shall be followed. Permitted Uses. Permitted uses are those land uses allowed in a given subarea subject to the development regulations of the Development Code. Conditionally Permitted Uses. Conditionally permitted uses, because of their unusual site development requirements or unique operating characteristics, are subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission or City Planner. Projects requiring a Conditional Use Permit shall be required to comply with the regulations of Section 17.04.030. In addition to the public hearing and notification requirements of Section 17.02.110, additional notification of all property owners within the Foothill Boulevard subarea in which the property under review is located is required. Table 17.32.030-A - Use Regulations for Foothill Boulevard Districts Summary Table of Permitted (P) and Conditionally Permitted (C) Uses RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES Antique Shops Apparel a) Boutiques b) General Appliance Stores and Repair Art, Music, Photographic Studios and Supply Stores Auto Service Station Auto Service (including trailers, motorcycles, boats, campers): a) Sales (with ancillary repair facilities) b) Rentals c) Minor Repair (does not include major engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work, upholstery, etc.) Coin-op Washing Automatic Washing Parts and Supplies 1 2 3 4 d) e) f) Sc P P P P Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 O p p p p p p1 p p P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p p p p p p p4 C C C C C C C C C C P Refer to Subarea 4 Section 17.32.080.F.7.b. (footnote 2). P P P C P P P P P P P P P C C C C C C C P P P P All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030.Q Commercial/Office uses may be located in the RRC district only with the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 square feet per site or project. This provision is intended to facilitate the development of large, regionally related uses. Regionally Related Commercial uses are typifieo by large scale businesses which serve a market area significanfiy larger than those businesses which draw customers primarily from the neighborhood or community level. 17..32-10 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.030 Subarea One RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES ~C CC O MR Bakeries (retail only) P P Barber and Beauty Shops P P p Bed and Breakfast C C Bicycle Shops P p Blueprint and Photocopy Services P P Book, Gift and Stationery Stores p p p (other than adult related material) Candy and Confectior~eries P P Catering Eslablishments P P China and Glassware Stores P P Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots (operating on a temporary basis) P Churches C C C Cleaning and Pressing Establishments P P P Cocktail Lounge(bar, lounge, tavern) including related C C C entertainment Commercial Recreational: . a) Indoor uses such as bowling and billiards P P P b) Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball C C Convalescent Facilities & Hospitals P P P Curtain and Drapery Shops p Day Care Centers C C C Delicatessens and Specialty Food p p Stores Dru~ Stores and Pharmacies a) over 10,000 square feet p b) Pharmacies with or without specialty retail under 10,000 C P square feet Electronics Sales and Service P (TVs, Stereos, radios, computers) Educational Institutions, Parochial, Private (including colleges and universities) Farmers' Markets P P SC P P C P P P P P P Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU ,CO RRC MR LI2 P P P P P P P p p p p p p p p4 C C C C C C p p p p p4 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p p p p p4 P P P P P P p p p p p4 P P P C C C C C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P C C C C C C C C O C C C P P P P P P P P C C C C C C C P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C C C C C C C C C C C p p p p p p p p4 P P P P P P C P P P P P P P P P P P P Refer to Subarea 4 Section 17.32.080. F.7.b (footnote 2). All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030.D. Commercial/Office uses may be located in the RRC district only with the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 square feet per site or project. This provision is intended to facilitate the development of large, regionally related uses. Regionally Related Commercial uses are typified by large scale businesses which serve a market area significantly larger than those businesses which draw customers primarily from the neighborhood or community level. 17,,32-11 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.030 Subarea One RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES SC CC O MR Floor Covering Sho~s p Flodst Shops p p p Furniture Stores p p Hardware Stores p Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics C P Hoioby Shops p p Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains P P Janitorial Services and Supplies P Jewelry Stores p p Laundry (Self Service) p Leather Goods and Luggage Stores P P Libraries and Museums, public and, private Liquor Stores C C Messenger and Wire Services P P Mixed Use Public Storage C3 Mortuaries and Cemeteries Music, Dance, and Martial Arts Stu¢~(~S C P Newspaper and Magazine Stores p p p Nurseries and Garden Supply Stores within enclosed area P Office, Business Machine and Computer Component Stores P P Office Supply Stores p p Paint, Glass, and Wallpaper Stores P Parking Facilities (commemial where fees are charged) Parks and Recreation Facilities, public and private Pet Shops P P Photocopy (Xerox) P P Political or Philanthropic Headquarters P SC P P C P P P P C C P Subarea Two CC O MR P P P P P P P P P P P P Subarea Three Subarea Four MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR I.t2 O P p P P P P P P P P P P p P P p P C P C p p p4 p p p p p4 p p p p p p4 p p p4 C P P P P P P P P P P P C C C C C p p p p p p4 P C P P p p p p p p p p p4 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p p p p4 p p p p p p4 C C Refer to Subarea 4 Sectior~ 17.32,080.F.7,b (footnote 2). All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. 3 Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030, D 4 Comrr~mial/'Office uses may be located in the RRC district only with the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 square feet per site or project. This provision is intended to facilitate the development of large, regionally related uses, Regionally Related Commercial uses are typified by large scale businesses which serve a market area significantly larger than those businesses which drew customers primarily from the neighborhood or commun~ level, 17.32-12 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Subarea One Subarea Two RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES SC CC o MR P SC CC O MR Public and Private Clubs and Lodges, including YMCA, YWCA, and similar Youth Group Uses Record and Tape Stores P P P p Recreational Vehicle Storage Yards Restaurants (sit down): a) with entertainment and/or cocktail lounge, bar C C C C C b) incidental serving of beer and wine (without a cocktail lounge, p p p p p p bar, entertainment or dancing) c) caf~, limited to 20 seats (including outdoor seating) P P P P P P d) Fast Food: Wilh drive-thru C C Without drive-thru P P P p Shoe Stores and Repair Shops P P P P Specialty Retail P P P P Sportin~ Goods Stores: a) Specialty; Backpacking, Tennis, Skiing, Mountaineering, p p p p Fishing, etc, b) General; encompassing a p p vadety of sports equipment Supermarkets P p Swimming Pool Services and Supplies P P Tailor Shops P P P P Toy Stores P P P P Variety Department Stores, C P C P Junior Department Stores Veterinary (domestic): a) Non-boarding P C P C b) Boarding C C Vocational or Business Trade Schoots Watch and Clock Repair Stores P P P P Yardage Goods Stores p p MHR SC Section 17.32.030 Subarea Three Subarea Four CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 P P P P P C C C C C P P P P P P P P P P P P C C C P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P C P P P P P P P C C C C p p p p p4 P P P O C C C Refer to Subarea 4 Section 17.32.080.F.7.b. (footnote 2). All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 01 Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030.D. Commemial/Office uses may be located in the RRC district only with the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 square feet per site or project. This provision is intended to facilitate the development of large, regionally related uses. Regionally Related Commemial uses are typified by large scale businesses which serve a market area significantly larger than those businesses which draw customers primarily from the neighborhood or community level. 17.32-13 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.030 ENTERTAINMENT AND CULTURAL USES Arcades Cultural/Artist Exhibits: a) Indoor Gallery and Art Sales p b) Out(k3or Art Exhibits p Discotheques C C Theaters: a) Dinner Theater p p b) Movie Theater including Multiplex P Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 O C C C C C C C C C P P C p p C P C P C C C C C C C C P P P C P P P P P OFFICE & ADMINISTRATIVE USES Administrative, Business, and Professional Offices Banks, Finance Services and institutions, including drive-thru Business and Office Services Interior Decorating Firms Medical/Dental Offices and Related, Health Clinics Optician and Optometrist Sheps Realtors and Real Estate Offices Travel Agencies Subarea One Subarea Two S~barea Three Subarea Four SC CC O MR P SC CC ,,, O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 O p p p p p p p p p p p p4 p P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P p p p p p p p p p p4 p p p p p p p p p p p4 p p p p p p p p p p p p p4 p p p p p p p p p p p p p4 p PUBLIC USES Transit Facilities Public Utility Installations Subarea One Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 O C Refer to Subarea 4 Sectior~ 17.32080,F,7,b. (footnote 2). All industrial uses and development standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17,32,030~D Commercial/Office uses may be located in the RRC distdct only with the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of at least 15,000 square feetpersiteorproject. This provision is intended tofacilitate thedeveloprnentoflarge, regionally related uses. Regionally Related Commercial uses are typified by la~ge scale businesses which serve a market area significantly larger than those businesses which draw customers primarily from the neighborhood or communit~ level. 17.32-14 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code RESIDENTIAL USES Single Family Detached Singte Family Attached (duplex, triplex, fourplex) Multi-Family Dwellings Ancillary Residential Uses a) Home-care facilities (6 or less) b) On-site private recreation facilities Accessory Uses: a) Accessory Structures b) Home Occupation Subarea One SC CC O MR P SC P Section 17.32.030 Subarea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P HOTEL USES Hotel/Motel Hotel Facilities (major) Ancillary Uses: Subarea Oae Suba~ea Two Subarea Three Subarea Four SC CC O MR P SC CC O MR MHR SC CC CO LMR MR U MU CC RRC MR LI2 C P P a) Beauty/Barber Shop P b) Cates P c) Cateflag Services P d) Cocktail Lounge P e) Conference/Convention Facilities P f) Florist Shops P g) Gift Shops P h) Newspaper/Magazine Stores P i) Pharmacies P j) Restaurants (sit down) P k) Tourist Information P I) Travel Agencies P Refer to Subarea 4 Section 17.32.08OF.7.b. (footnote 2). All industrial uses and dew~lopment standards shall be as provided in Subarea 7 of Chapter 17.30. Subject to Master Plan requirements pursuant to 17.32.030.D. Commercial/Office uses may be located in the RRC district only with the concurrent development of one major regionally related anchor business of at teast 15,000 squarefeetpersiteorproject. This provisionisintendedtofacilitatetheclevelopmentotlarge, regionally relaled uses. RegionallyRelatedCommercialusesaretypified by large scale businesses which serve a market area significantly larger than those businesses which draw customers primarily from the neighborhood or community level. C. Land Use Definitions Specialty Retail. This use is typified as small shops and boutiques which specialize in limited product lines of unique and novel designs and/or purposes. Specialty Retail is defined as follows: 17.32-15 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32.030 ao Any retail business not listed separately in Sections 17.32.080.A through D, which limits its sales to product lines of singular purpose or of unique and special design (i.e., cutlery shops, small household or personal appliances, kitchenware, novelty gifts, etc.). Service businesses are not a specialty retail use. Limited to a business area of 3,000 square feet totally within an enclosed building. The office and administrative use is ancillary to the specialty retail uses and should not exceed 50 percent of the gross floor area in any integrated Specialty Commercial Center or a master planned development. Through the Conditional Use Permit process, the percentage of gross floor area for office and administrative uses may exceed 50 percent, subject to the Commission's findings that the development meets the intent of Specialty Retail, is a benefit to the community, and furthers the goals of this Chapter. Mixed Use Public Storage. Activities include the rental or lease of small-scale, enclosed storage units or parking spaces when in combination with retail or office uses. Uses typically include self-storage facilities with caretaker's residence and recreational vehicle storage. Storage shall be set back a minimum of 100 feet from Foothill Boulevard and screened from view. It does not include automotive fleet storage, rental car lots, or overnight storage of service vehicles. Restaurants with Entertainment and/or Serving of Alcoholic Beverages. This use is typified as a full-service dining facility with major portions of the floor area and business operations being devoted to the on-site preparation and consumption of food. Entertainment activities should be limited to ancillary support functions which shall form a minor part of the floor area and business operation. The serving of alcoholic beverages shall be in conjunction with restaurant usage and the availability of full listed menu items. The sale and serving of alcoholic beverages shall cease when such menu items are not available to customers. Master Plans. The intent of a master plan is to provide for integrated development at the earliest possible time in the review process. Through the master plan, there is an opportunity to coordinate the efforts of single or multiple property owners and discourage piecemeal strip commercial development. The following criteria is intended to apply to all projects and should not be constrained to parcel lines or site boundaries: A conceptual master plan may be required by the City Planner when it is evident that piecemeal development will prevent or produce future development of adjacent properties in a manner not consistent with the intent of this Chapter. A conceptual master plan shall be submitted for Planning Commission approval, together with any development proposals, and shall address all other parcels as they relate to the master plan. A conceptual master plan shall contain, as a minimum, the requirements as set forth in Development Code Section 17.20.030. Non-Conformincl Uses and Structures. This section is intended to provide flexibility in the regulation of existing non-conforming uses and structures by establishing alternative standards for the improvement of such uses and structures within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. In addition, this section is intended to control the number and extent of non-conforming structures by prohibiting their being moved, altered, or enlarged in a manner that would be detrimental to the goals and objectives of this Chapter. All provisions of Section 17.02.130 for Non- 17.32-16 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.030 - 17. 32.050 Conforming Uses and Structures shall apply to development within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor except as provided in this Section. 1. Alterations and Additions to Non-Conforming Uses: Existing non-conforming uses may be expanded: with approval of a Conditional Use Permit up to 50 percent of the size, but not to exceed 5,000 square feet, of the use when the use became non-conforming. The Planning Commission must find that such expansion is not detrimental to the goals and objectives of this Chapter in addition to the findings required in Section 17.02.130. bo Expansion of existing non-conforming uses must be accompanied by improvement of existing non-conforming features (parking, landscaping, etc.) which significantly decreases the degree of non-conformity. In addition, facade upgrading in compliance with the design concepts of this Chapter is required as part of any use expansion. Alterations and Additions to Non-Conforming Structures. Existing non-conforming structures may be altered or reconstructed with approval of a Conditional Use Permit if such alteration and reconstruction is found to promote the design policies of this Chapter or the historic goals and objectives of the City. Existing non-conforming setbacks and building heights may be retained or unmodified as part of the conversions through design review approval. Structures declared by the City to be of historic significance may be remodeled under the provisions of the State Historical Building Code. Section 17.32.040 - Performance Standards The conduct and operation of all uses in the Foothill Boulevard Districts shall comply with the minimum standards of performance set forth in Section 17.08.080 for residential uses or Section 17.10.050 for all office and commercial uses. Section 17.32.050 - General Design Guidelines This section establishes parameters within which the community character for the entire Foothill Boulevard Corridor can be created. To do so, a number of issues and design concepts have been previously explored. However, at the core of all discussion and investigation has been the attempt to define community character in an accurate, comprehensive, and pragmatic manner. The Community Design Guidelines are primarily focused on the creation of aesthetic character. The purpose is to create a visual environment that evokes a distinctive and unifying image which is unique to Rancho Cucamonga. To accomplish this task, the Foothill Boulevard Corridor must first distinguish itself from other major thoroughfares in nearby communities and, second, it must serve as a visually unifying concourse that links the entire community of Rancho Cucamonga. Lastly, it is important to have a design statement for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor with each contributing community design element skillfully orchestrated to promote a contiguous, cohesive, community design image. The provisions of this section shall apply to all Foothill Boulevard Districts, unless otherwise specified herein. Any addition, remodeling, relocation, or construction requiring a building permit within any Foothill Boulevard District is subject to Development/Design Review pursuant to Chapter 17.06. The Community Design Guidelines consist of the following components: (A) Image Enhancement Features, (B) Community Design Vocabulary, (C) Existing Community Design Features Along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, and (D) Overall Community Design Concepts. More specific urban design guidelines are incorporated in the Subarea Development Standards, Section 17.32.080, which describes the overall area-wide design concepts and guidelines. In addition, the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement, Section 17.32.060, extends the design concepts of the Foothill Boulevard Design 17.. 32-17 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 Theme through portions of the Terra Vista and Victoria Community Plans and the Industrial Districts. Ima(~e Enhancement Features. Community image is related to the way people experience the City -- driving through it, observing its natural qualities and the character of it's buildings, walking through commercial areas, and visiting specific destinations. The best communities have the following memorable image enhancement features: A clear sense of arrival through a distinct change in landscape, hardscape, built areas, or special entrance monumentat[on features. A civic, commercial, or cultural public urban open space, which defines the activities, history, commerce, or natural/manmade features which the community as a whole values. Typical public urban open spaces consist of plazas, courtyards, urban paseos, market streets, historic landmarks, and public parks. A clear organization of streets, identifiable districts, and landmarks which gives people a sense of direction and orientation. The extent of confusion in traffic circulation, and the amount of congestion increasingly figures in people's perceptions of cities. A sense of uniqueness. This quality can be derived from a single feature, a district-wide theme reflecting ethnic or historical themes, or an event which is staged in a special place each year. 4. A sense of place in a shared past which gives people a sense of belonging. Community Desi(~n Vocabulary. In an effort to provide a unique community image for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, a variety of existing or proposed image enhancement elements will be provided or enhanced and designed to increase corridor identity. Vocabulary of these image giving elements include the following: Activitv Centers. Activity Centers are points of intersection at major streets or landmarks along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. As such, they are points of concentrated activity which give identity to individual subareas. Major Activity Centers located contiguous to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor include the areas surrounding the following intersections: a. Foothill Boulevard at San Bernardino Road b. Foothill Boulevard at Vineyard Avenue c. Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue d. Foothill Boulevard at Hermosa Avenue e. Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue The injection of small doses of urbanity at these key activity centers is a suggested method for creating a more interesting, formal, and diverse impression of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. The Activity' Center at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road is a more rural, informal, village design concept. Suburban Parkway Transitions. It is recognized that the Foothill Boulevard Corridor will not become a totally pedestrian-oriented environment. Therefore, the five pedestrian-oriented activity centers listed above, will be linked together by "suburban 17.32-18 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 parkway" transition area.,;. These parkway transition sections will consist of informal landscape treatments dominated by drifts of London Planes, California Sycamore, and Purple Plum trees. Other parkway characteristics include rolling turf berms and meandering/undulating sidewalks which are designed to complement informal landscape treatments. Landmarks Specific elements of the environment that exhibit and promote an individual or unique identity include landmarks. Because landmarks are, by definition, unique and distinct, they are also few' in number. Landmarks are typically associated with historic structures/features or prominent land forms which exhibit memorable qualities and project a strong identity or image. Landmarks located contiguous to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor include: a. The Sycamore Inn b. The Oso Bear Monument c. The remnants of the Cucamonga China Town d. The Thomas Brothers Winery e. The Virginia Dare Winery f. The first U.S. Post Office site in Cucamonga g. John and George Klusman Houses h. Mitchell House i. Mandala House i. Bell House k. Guidera House I. Sacred Heart Church m. Aggazzotti Winery Sections of San Bernardino Road located east of the Southern Pacific Railroad bridge and north of Foothill Boulevard Gateways. Gateway elements are typically associated with prominent landforms, landscape features, structures, or entrance monumentation signs designed to announce entrance into a community or special districts. Currently, these gateway features are nonexistent within the planning area, which contribute to an overall lack of corridor definition or identity. Gateways are proposed for the intersections of Foothill Boulevard/Grove Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard/East Avenue. 17.32-19 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 ENTRY PORTAL INCLUDE SPECIAL HARDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS~ IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AS WELL AS PRIVATE PROPERTY A8 DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT Views. View opportunities are found within every subarea and range from expansive vistas of distant mountains, to tightly framed views of landmarks, prominent natural landforms, or other special features located contiguous to Foothill Boulevard. The critical requirement is that view opportunities be recognized and enhanced and that all proposed developments be designed to preserve and protect the desired view. Key Existinq Community Features. In an effort to promote community design within the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, a variety of existing community design features have been identified. It is the intent of the community design plan to identify these elements so that they may be preserved or enhanced. The following key community features are significant structures and are worthy of preservation/restoration and should be incorporated into any future development proposals for their respective sites. Key community design features related to the Foothill Boulevard are described below. Thomas Brothers and VirGinia Dare Wineries. These wineries are one of the major theme-setting community character elements for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. All streetscape/landscape and architectural components shall be sensitive to and compatible with the overall winery theme of Rancho Cucamonga. Key visual elements, such as grape arbors and trellis elements, shall be consistently repeated along the corridor. Architectural variations which fully reflect the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga shall be encouraged. The Thomas Brothers Winery, first established in 1839, is among the oldest in the state. The building reflects early California/Spanish architectural influences, characterized by such elements as stucco walls, board and batten siding, gable roofs, Spanish clay roof tiles, heavy weathered wood doors and entrance gates, and a vine covered grape arbor that extends the entire length of the west and south building elevations. 17.32-20 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 Typical Winery Barn Gablo Barn with Hip Shad Roof Foothill Boulevard/Archibald Avenue Intersection. This intersection is located at the center of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and holds potential for establishing a major, urban-oriented, activity center. Development surrounding this intersection will promote pedestrian-oriented retai~ services designed to serve the specialty needs of the community. Major redevelopment on all corners, excluding the center on the northwest corner, will promote active commercial uses within a pedestrian-dominated context. The opportunity of establishing a "commons" or public urban open space should be explored and it should be designed to reinforce and promote pedestrian usage by integrating such features as: a. A 25-foot urban setback. b. Pedestrian level architecture stepped to upper levels. c. Formal landscape arrangement. d. Urban streetscape vocabulary. e. Major urban design statement along Foothill Boulevard. f. Public plaza space. 17.32-21 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 ...... FOOTHILL BOULEVARD- ARCHIBALD AVENUE INTERSECTION Sycamore Inn. The Sycamore Inn ActNity Center is dominated by a quality sit-down restaurant and complemented by a small specialty-oriented restaurant and the original Red Chief Motel. Originally established in the 1880s this large, two-story structure was constructed as an inn/stage stop in the community known as Bear Gulch. The architecture is characterized by chateau and craftsman details. The building is sheathed in vertical wood siding and has a moderately pitched gable roof with a native stone chimney. The building and site are enhanced by the presence of numerous mature California Sycamore trees. Maclic Lamp Restaurant. The Magic Lamp Restaurant is located in an eclectic building which is characterized by brick walls and a unique clay-tiled hip roof. The roof of the structure is composed of a vadety of roof tiles stacked in such a fashion as to provide a rich, textured effect. The restaurant lies within the Bear Gulch Activity Area. Eucalyptus Windrows. The remnants of a windrow are found on either side of Foothill Boulevard, east of the Southern Pacific Railread bridge crossing which traverses Foothill Boulevard. The trees are mature and appear healthy; although they are not maintained and set a distinctive open space character along Foothill Boulevard. Notable Structures. The following community features are notable structures and, at the property owners option, can be incorporated into a future development proposal. Any such proposal must be required to upgrade these structures to current City Development Standards (i.e., building and safety, land use circulation/access, and landscaping) or may be relocated off-site. Old Route 66 Gas Station (9670). This former gas station, located near the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue, is comprised of two separate buildings which include an office, gas pump canopy, and a separate garage building. The architecture is characterized by the use of white stucco parapet walls with small roof caps and Spanish roof tiles. 17.32 -22 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 San Bernardino Road/Foothill Boulevard (8291). This unusual building shows signs of streamline/art deco architecture. The building is characterized by two streamline overhead drive-under canopies that appear symmetrical and is also characterized by metal elevation panels, a flat roof, and a large sign column which is integrated into the building facade. Former Mountain View School (9113). This residence, once utilized as a private children's school, is representative of a California bungalow with Queen Anne details. Details include wood siding, gable door, multi-light windows, and siding faces. Klusman House (8841) - Southwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. This former residence is a two-story structure and of Spanish Colonial Revival style. It is characterized by tow-pitch hipped roof with red tile in an irregular pattern, polygonal tower, narrow long windows, "S" shaped molding, and multi-pane windows. Archibald House - Southwest Corner of Archibald Avenue and Estacia Court. This residence appears very old with Victorian era overtones. The cottage is characterized by a steeply-pitched hip and gable roof, arches, gable details, porch arches, and large multi-light windows. Foothill Boulevard House. This two-story structure is characterized by a stucco exterior, gable roof, smaller peripheral residential units (rentals), and mature landscaping. Note: This structure has been moved from the site. 10340 Foothill Boulevard. This residence is a two-story structure with craftsman overtones characterized by the gable roof, large front porch, wood siding, exposed eaves and rafters, and multi-light windows. 12737 Foothill Boulevard. This residence is a California bungalow characterized by a low-pitched gable roof, large front porch, wood siding, multi-light windows, and an arbor/portico leading to the detached garage. 9494 Foothill Boulevard. This California bungalow is characterized by exposed rafters in the eaves, a multi-gable roof, corner porch, multi-light windows, and horizontal wood siding. Brackets Gable End Rafter Tails Porch 17'.32-23 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 Overall Communih/Desitin Concept. The overall Community Design Concept is comprised of a hierarchy of urban design components which range from the development of large subareas, to specifically located district activity centers. The intent of the Community Design Concept is to provide a broad-brushed overview of general design components which ultimately lead to the development of specific design guidelines. The overall Community Design Concept consists of subarea structure, activity centers, suburban parkways, overall architectural concept, and overall landscape architectural concept Subarea Structure. In an attempt to provide individual district identity, the Foothill Boulevard Corridor has been segmented into four distinct subareas. Each subarea contains an activity center or focal point, such as a concentration of urban-oriented specialty uses, which is intended to increase the "imageability" of each individual subarea. These separate subarea identities will promote a sense of place for the residents and visitors to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor and will ultimately enhance property values. Activity Centers. Each subarea within the planning area is punctuated by an urban-oriented activity center. Typically located at major intersections, these activity centers function to provide a district level focal point which ultimately increases district level density. The activity centers will be composed of urban-oriented specialty commercial uses, designed in such a manner as to accommodate pedestrian-oriented activities. Individual structures and large commercial shopping centers will be designed in such a manner as to promote an urban-oriented "Rancho Winery Revival" theme complemented by higher intensity built forms. Activity Center/Intersection Con~ceDt. All building orientations will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage as much as practical. The 25-foot building setback areas will have enriched pedestrian zones with special hardscape materials, formal landscape arrangements (see illustrative sketch), and pedestrian-level lighting. Other streetscape elements such as bollards, crosswalks, and street furniture should assume a decidedly village-oriented theme of earth-tone colors and warm materials such as stained wood, river rock, black wrought iron, and textured stucco. Two activity centers exhibit some slight modifications to the concept described above. Bear Gulch Village Activity Center will ex,hibit a less formal, more natural setting while the Etiwanda Activity Center will be similar in appearance to the Foothill BoulevardNineyard Avenue intersection. The concept will be less pedestrian, meaning less hardscape materials, plazas, and furniture and more turf, landscaping, and berms. The concept within the activity center area is to incorporate a formal, regularly spaced street tree planting system utilizing an informally shaped, colorful street tree palette. The trees are to be planted 30 feet on center and are to be placed between 2 to 5 feet inside the property line. The activity center/intersection concept urban streetscape design shall extend the full length of the design plan priority areas along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. At the cross streets, the design shall extend at least as far as the first driveway north and south of the cross streets. The extent of the urban streetscape design may be modified through the design review process in order to adjust for local public right-of-way conditions and ensure a logical alignment of similar features on opposing sides of the street. 17.32-24 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 A. URBAN FORM Single story structure at sidewalk edge with two, possibly story structures behind. At major intemections, buildings should be sidewalk adjacent, with awnings of structural overhangs for solar ~laf for p~;ans. Buildings not within intersections zones. HISTORICAL/ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING POTENTIAL General lack ofa atrong architectural 'thema.' Potential based upon hiModc nature of Foothill Blvd. Winery at Vineyard may add some "ranch elements' to architecture such as grape arbors or front porches. Older gas stations along Foolhill bui# during the '40's & '50's also contain special architeotura; elamants and material contexL DESIGN THEME POTENTIAL A specific design theme is considered a weak idea and a conjured theme is also a poor idea. An overall scale, form, and materials palette is considered most appropriate. CIRCULATION NEEDS Foothilll Blvd. is not a pedestrian concourse; it is a vehicular confdor. The urban design alternatives should consider creating pedestrian nodes at designated lecatlens. Parldng should be hidden at these designated intersections. Consider a corndor-leng bikeway. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT NEEDS Capital improvements would include major emphasis at designated intersections. Elements might include traffic (~ontml equipmeat, crewwalks, light standards, trees, and a majdr urban element (fountain, sculptures, or aisles of flags/banners). F. :STREETSCAPE Oontempomry standards to be inmrpomtnd. New lights, l~raffic control, side street signal. No particular style, but consider on ccmsiatent color. G. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY Congregate pedes~an oriented uses at major intersec~ons. Avoid vehicular drive-thin uses at these key locations. H. MATERIALS AND COLORS Heavy emphasis on textured materials with mix of warm and cool Colors. Avoidance of large expanses of glass or other reflective materials. Use of white also. For major wall color, smooth finish stucco, stained woods and metal roofs as predominate material. I. VACANT LAND Vacant areas at designated interseclions should incorporete selected urban design concept into project. Meandering sidewalks should connect with access areas at commercial pacedes (plazas, seatfng, etc.) ACTIVITY CENTER CONCEPT 17,32-25 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 ~.~1 If, ~-t~,;....~ Formal Street .~.~.~. '..,_ .'~.~.~.~-~ Tree Planting ~~.~~.: :. ~ Two Sto~ Building · -'j-~ ~~-~ Enri~ed PI~ ..~::L~_,..~ ~?J*~;~'.'.'.' ~ ~ ,~ Paving ~'~t~l~.~,~ ~t--~- . ! Fountain Element :~!~ ~ I! ~, ': ~ "'' ~ .... Walk Paving o 0 Bollard~ Colonnade Entry Formal Foundation Planting ACTIVITY CENTER/INTERSECTION CONCEPT 17.32-26 6/99 ' Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 [.15'0' I::)ecoe~tive light Focal ateme clock tower/klo~, to be Trash i~bs. ~ o~ ~t~ ~b~ S~ ~ ~ ~te~l~ · ~ .......--';- "';'" ~ to ~ ~e~i~. ~al ~ x ~. X . . P~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~ d~i~ ~ ~ ~bh. Bul~ba ~ ~ ~ ~ ~in - Suburban Parkways. Suburban parkways will be designed to link individual activity centers. The parkways will be designed with informal clusters of trees and rolling turf berms, which evoke pastoral, suburban-oriented, qualities. SinglHtory retail Traditional IIgM Turf standard with imnner Meander Walk Single story retail with elevation Center median -informal evergreen $1met lines Foundation Shrub · Planling · , , ................... % ~., 17.32-27 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32.050 Parkway Transitions. In order to provide a gradual transition from urban-oriented parkways, "parkway transitions" have been introduced within the plan. Parkway transitions are designed to transition formal hardscape elements found within the urban activity zone into informal landscape statements which incorporate rolling turf berms, meandering/undulating sidewalks; and informal tree plantings. Specifically, the parkway transition is characterized by a 75-foot transition zone, dominated by Flowering Plum accent trees. See sketch. Private Development PARKWAY TRANSITION 6. Circulation Svstem Concepts. Center Median Islands. In order to preserve the level of service on Foothill Boulevard, access to commercial properties should be via the median breaks at signalized intersections, with off-street, internal circulation to be provided to serve the properties between intersections. It will also be necessary to accept an increased number of U-turns at the remaining intersections to reduce the greater friction caused by more frequent median openings. Any median break on a street with such high volume must be signalized for safety; and when signals are placed less than approximately 700 feet apart, the speed at which progressive traffic movement can be obtained falls below an acceptable level. East-west arterials in the City will have to be capable of two-way, progressive traffic service for a large part of the day. For these reasons, no median break has been planned, for example, at Red Hill Country Club Drive, San Diego Avenue, or Klusman Avenue. Klusman Avenue is only 520 feet from Malachite Avenue, an important future intersection, and is at a questionable distance of 670 feet from Archibald Avenue. The necessary left-turn 17.32-28 6/99 .... Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 lanes for median breaks eliminate median planting and, when such breaks are close together, reduce the aesthetic value of the median and its visibility. This creates the possibility of traffic from driveways attempting to make left turns, not realizing a median exists. Prior to the construction of a median island across the intersection of Klusman Avenue, a preemptive traffic control system approved by the City Engineer and the Fire District shall be provided at the intersections of Archibald Avenue and San Bernardino Road/Foothill Boulevard to facilitate emergency access to eastbound Foothill Boulevard. Alternate median breaks and emergency access across the medians may be considered subject to review and approval of a detailed traffic safety analysis by the City Engineer. The following Median Location Maps depict the Center Median Program for the four subareas. A 14-foot center median shall be provided within Foothill Boulevard and designed to provide access control and a unifying landscape statement. The median will feature accent tree planting (Crape Myrtles) at the median nose areas, underplanted with a low evergreen ground cover. The major evergreen tree (Rhus Lancea) will be underplanted with shrubs. See the median design island concepts on Page 17.32-35. Access Control Program. Businesses contiguous to Foothill Boulevard currently realize no access restrictions. In addition, existing fragmented parcel configurations promote a multitude of conflicting access points which disrupt traffic flow by causing increased side friction. A recommended program of access controls, consistent with current city access policies, regulating access points, driveway cuts, and their location from one another, including the provision of reciprocal access agreements, and special vehicular access controls, (such as right-in, and right-out islands) is necessary because of the following: (1) Increased vehicular traffic capacity; (2) Increased perception of safety; (3) Reduced vehicular traffic conflict points; and (4) Reduced vehicle/pedestrian conflict points. 17.32-29 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 ...... Baker - Grove 17.32-30 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 17.32-31 6~99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 e-- .-- f- (13 , JL -- Helms Hellman 17.32-32 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 East Ave, 17.32-33 6~99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 /-----.-- PATHWAY MEDIAN ACCENT TREES ,/ (CRAPE MYRTLE) TRIANGULAR SPACING '"',,. RHUS LANCEA 30' O.C. MAJOR EVERGREEN TREE / 24" I. 'DETAIL SECTION NTS EQ. .;_ EQ. i4' PARKWAY4/IEDIAN ACCENT TREE CRAPE MYR'rt~ MKJOR EVERGREEN MEDIM~ TREE SHRUBS/GROUND COVER ~ CURB w/lr HARDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EDGE 2'-0" MIN. TREE SETBACK FROM EDGE OF MAINTENANCE EDGE SECTION TYPICAL MID BLOCK LOCATION MEDIAN ISLAND DESIGN CONCEPTS 17.32-34 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 Red Hill Countrv Club Drive Reali0nment. The existing skewed-angle intersection of Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill Boulevard is in close proximity to an existing traffic signal at Grove Avenue. The combination of this close intersection spacing and skewed alignment creates operational difficulties with the traffic flow on Foothill Boulevard. A feasible realignment has been determined by an in-depth traffic engineering study. The proposed plan is to realign Red Hill Country Club Drive to approximately 400 feet east of its present intersection at Foothill Boulevard, provide a median break, and install a two-phase traffic signal (no left turn arrows). The recommended alignment is shown on this page. RECOMMENDED ALIGNMENT 17.32-35 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 San Bernardino Road Aliqnment. San Bernardino Road currently merges with Foothill Boulevard at an acute angle which promotes vehicular conflicts with autos traveling east bound along Foothill Boulevard. In an effort to remedy this situation, San Bernardino Road will be realigned in order to form a "T" intersection with Foothill Boulevard. The "T" intersection will be aligned with the Sycamore Inn entrance driveway and traffic signal. 17.32-36 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 Hellman Avenue-Klusman Avenue Block Circulation Master Plan. A circulation master plan, in conjunction with a detailed traffic/circulation analysis, shall be developed with any future development proposals for the entire block in order to determine the following issues: (1) Access to San Bernardino Road. It is the intent of this Specific Plan to discourage direct access and through non-residential traffic from Foothill Boulevard or on site to San Bernardino Road. The ultimate circulation master plan must show the necessity for access to San Bernardino Road and the ultimate on-site circulation configuration and improvements. (2) Access Points. The arrows depicting access points are shown in order to limit access onto Foothill Boulevard and Klusman Avenue and are located at points opposite existing roadways or future traffic signals. (3) Interior Circulati,on. A suggested interior circulation pattern is illustrated by dashed lines. It is not the intent to require public streets, but rather to show a conceptual alignment which may be in the form of private drives/aisles and streets. )L ~T. 17.32-37 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 7. Section 17.32.050 Architectural Concelat. The overall architectural concept is characterized by architectural elements which complement Rancho Cucamonga's heritage. A diversity of architectural styles are allowed within the corri,dor, rather than one specific style, in an effort to promote a richness of architectural character. While no specific architectural theme is required, "Rancho Cucamonga Heritage" architectural styles such as California barn, winery, mission, and agricultural character are encouraged. a. These design elements for all buildings within the study area are encouraged: (1) Richness of surface and texture; (2) Equal void-to-solid building wall ratios; (3) Multi-planed, pitched roofs; (4) Vegetation integrated with building walls; (5) Roof overhangs; (6) Plazas; (7) Regular or traditional window rhythms; (8) Arched windows and doorways; (9) Subtle warm earthen tones or pale pastels;* (10) White and off-white;* and (11) Bright color trims.* * These color ranges are examples and are only encouraged to be utilized. Exposed Rafter Tails MuKi Plan~ Hip R~f T~r Fo~l A~nt Grape A~or 17.32-38 6/99 Section 17.32.050 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code b. Discouraged architectural elements include: (1) Highly reflective surfaces (steel); (2) Large blank walls; (3) Flat roofs; (4) Split face block (5) Exposed concrete block; (6) Reflective glass; (7) Metal siding; (8) Plastic siding; and (9) Irregular, modernistic window shapes and rhythms. General Materials Palette. There are six categories of architectural and landscape architectural elements that will formulate the basis for new development design for the corridor. When these elements are incorporated into contemporary development designs, the effect will retain individuality while retaining certain common design elements. ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS ELEMENT 1: Sloping roof (shallow to moderate) Material: Clay barrel tile Colors: *Red to brown ELEMENT 2: Walls Material: Stucco (rough textured) Colors: *White, off-white, beige "flat" finish; pale pastel colors Material: Wood horizontal clapboard or board and batten used in horizontal planes Colors: *Dark brown - light brown ELEMENT 3: Accents Material: Tile Colors: *Glazed or unglazed terra cotta ELEMENT 4: Awning Material: Treated canvas (plastic laminated) Colors: *Dark green, reds/blues 17.32-39 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code ELEMENT 5: Pavement Material: Interlocking pavers, and concrete Colors: *Integral color terra cotta ELEMENT 6: Fences/Gates Material: Wrought iron Colors: *Painted black, reddish brown, or dark green *These color ranges are examples and are only encouraged to be utilized. Section 17.32.050 Wall Material Roofs Details .... I ! ! Stucco Board & Brick River Rock G,,ble Roof HI,- Roof Barn 8heel Pitch Roof Rafter Tails Towers Arbors Multi Paned Windows GENERAL MATERIALS PALETTE Landscape Architectural Concept. The Landscape Concept for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor proposes the use of a specific palette of trees in designated areas to reinforce both urban and suburban architectural features. The activity centers will distinguish from suburban parkway areas to the use of formal, urban-oriented tree plantings except as noted in Bear Gulch. These formal tree plantings will border all activity centers and will define these areas as being higher-intensity, urban-oriented districts. Informal plantings will provide a casual backdrop to suburban parkway areas which lie between activity 17.32-40 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 nodes (see graphic). The informal plantings will be located between activity centers in order to relate to these lower-intensity suburban transition areas. In addition, the overall landscape concept shall incorporate a mixture of landscape and hardscape features using native materials All sign casements, poles, street furniture, light standards, and similar hardware within 10 feet of the public right-of-way, shall be painted a color chosen as the Foothill Boulevard Corridor Theme Color; sign faces may vary and match the related architecture. Establish a colorful landscape edge at the base of buildings and avoid asphalt edges at the base of structures as much as possible. Plant materials located in containers are appropriate. Landscaping should result in a low profile image, i.e., use of blade grass lawn areas, (i.e., including water conservation practices/methods and drought tolerant plant materials) canopy trees in parking areas, use of hedges, and low walls to screen service areas. Internal pedestrian systems, linking office complexes with neighboring commercial or office developments, should be located close to buildings and be partially covered. Add large (15-gallon to 24-inch box) canopy trees to existing landscapes consistent with City standards. On-site plant masses should assume a non-uniform arrangement. The diversity of massing types should be great enough to provide interest, but kept to a level which evokes a relaxed, natural feeling. go Water conserving irrigation systems and landscape materials shall be used in all public and private landscaping. 2. Site Plan Desion. Existina Site Conditions. Existing site conditions such as mature vegetation, slopes, drainage courses, rock outcroppings, and views should all be considered as possibilities for inclusion in the project. Use of valuable existing site elements will assist in formulating a focused design theme. Buildin(:j Orientation. Placement of the buildings shall be done in a manner compatible with surrounding existing and planned uses and buildings. The setback from streets and adjacent properties is directly proportionate to the scale of the proposed building and those around it. Larger buildings will require more setback area for a balance of scale and for the protection of solar access to the proposed building and adjacent sites. Lastly, placement of the building should provide the most aesthetic public views. (1) Orient/screen all auto-related facilities (i.e., working bays, storage, etc.) from public view. (2) Buildings shall orient their public entrances toward Foothill Boulevard as much as possible. 17..32-41 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 Access/Circulation. The access and circulation of a development should be designed to provide a safe and efficient system, both on and off the site. Points of access shall be designed in conformance with the City's access regulations. The circulation system shall be designed to reduce conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on adjacent properties, combine circulation and access areas where possible, and provide adequate maneuvering areas. Points of access shall not conflict with other planned or existing access points. Pedestrian walkways shall connect every building with public sidewalks. LANDSCAPING: Randomly VEHICULAR OPERATIONS: Three lane~ in tmeh dlreeti~ with tenor median end turning lene~ as SIDEVRALK~ & PAVING: The ultimate curb I~,"u,~t will poma a ind building face. P~vfn~ ahc~ld be 14' . 12' 12' 41' Pavermerit Sidewalk meandem within Ihe 45' .etback (curb to building face) Parkin(] Areas. Parking areas should not be the dominant element in the overall design of a project and should be designed to minimize visual disruption. Parking areas should be screened from streets through combinations of mounding, landscaping, low profile wells, and grade separations. The design of parking areas should also minimize auto noise, lights and glare, and ambient air temperature. This can be accomplished through the use of sound walls, general location, use of well-designed lights, and landscaping throughout the parking lot. Utilize the concept of "tuck under" parking where it is not visible from Foothill Boulevard or from any other side street. (1) Whenever possible, locate site entries on side streets in order to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. When this is not possible, design the Foothill Boulevard site entry with appropriately patterned concrete or pavers to differentiate it from sidewalks. (2) Parking acces~ points, whether tocated on Foothill Boulevard or side streets, should be located as far as possible from street intersections. (3) Design parking areas so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving cars. Minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross parking aisles. 17...32-42 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 (4) Driveways and parking areas should be separated from adjacent sidewalks or landscaped areas by a curb not less than 4 inches high. (5) All parking spaces shall be clearly outlined on the surface of the parking facility. (6) In activity center locations, locate parking areas to the rear of the buildings. (7) Link individual project parking areas with on-site driveways which are clearly identified and easily recognized as connectors. (8) New development projects shall delineate on all submittal plans where the vehicular connection to adjacent sites are located. The applicant must also demonstrate provisions for access easement for such vehicular movements to adjacent properties consistent with an approved master plan. (9) As a condition of approval, the applicant may be required to combine parking facilities and access to serve more than one individual project. (10) Vehicular circulation through a parking facility should be directed away from the fire lane (adjacent to the rear of the stores), to the outer edge of the parking lot where there is less pedestrian traffic. (11) Within suburban parkways, parking areas should be designed in a manner which links the building to the street sidewalk system as an extension of the pedestrian environment. This can be accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and/or landscape treatments. Landscape/Open Space. Landscaping and open spaces should be designed as an integral part of the overall site plan design. Landscaping and open spaces should enhance the building design, enhance public views and spaces, provide buffers and transitions, provide for a balance of solar uses, and provide screening. Additionally, the landscape design should accent the overall design theme through the use of structures such as arbors or trellises, hardscape, and special paving. Bi-level landscape buffers shall be provided between different land uses designed to provide transition between high and low intensity land uses. The first buffering "level" consists of an 8-foot high concrete block wall. The second "level" is dominated by a dense 15-foot landscape buffer. 17.32-43 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 45' height limit (in excess of 100' from residerd~l district) ~25' height limit (if located wilhin 100' of single family ~.~ residential district) '*? aO' buMinO aelback (min.} l BI-LEVEL BUFFER Fencino,/Screenina. The use of any fencing or walls should be consistent with the overall design theme. Fences and walls are discouraged unless needed for a specific screening or safety purpose. Where they are needed, color, material, and variation of the vertical/horizontal plane are needed to blend with the site and building design. Lighting. On-site lights should provide a safe, functional, and aesthetic design. Enough lighting should be provided to ensure a safe environment while at the same time not cause areas of intense light or glare. Fixtures and poles shall be designed and placed in a manner consistent and compatible with the overall site and building design. Utilities and Ancillary EQuipment. On-site utilities and equipment shall be located in inconspicuous areas, away from public view. Where they are located in public view, they shall be screened with a combination of material that best suits the overall design theme. Transit Improvements. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided if determined necessary by the City Engineer and City Planner in consultation with the local transit provider. Activity Centers. At activity centers, place building at or adjacent to front setback line in order to create a more appealing, active streetscape. Front yard areas with parking lots dominating the street scene are specifically prohibited· 17.32-44 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 Connect meandedng watks to street fronlJng building entries Parking lot at comer is undesirable - building should dominate street scene Curb adjacent walk ties to comer plaza Endched comer plaza parking Enriched cross walk paving BUILDING LOCATION Suburban Parkways. Along suburban parkways, it is encouraged to place buildings on the 45-foot front setback line and avoid large sections of parking lot frontages at the setback line. 10. Building Design Design Theme. A recognizable design theme shall be established for each building. That theme shall be one which creates a harmonious building style, form, size, color, material, and roof line, as it relates to surrounding planned or existing development. Subtle variations are encouraged which provide visual interest but do not create abrupt changes causing discord in the overall design of the immediate area. It is not intended that one style of architecture should be dominant; but that individual structures shall create and enhance a high-quality and harmonious community appearance. Design buildings to be visually connected in order to eliminate a strip commercial appearance. b. Scale. The mass and scale of the building needs to be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street locations, and surrounding developments. No matter what the scale of a building, setbacks and overall height should provide an element of openness and human scale. Multi-story buildings should be set back toward the center of the site or be designed in a stepped style. 17.32-45 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 Materials and Colors. Colors, text~.~'es, and materials shall be coordinated to achieve total compatibility of design. They should blend well with the environment and not cause abrupt changes. Visibility. In situations where buildings are highly visible from side streets and/or adjacent parking areas, blank walls shall be prohibited and special emphasis placed on creating architectural interest. Signing. Every building shall be designed with a precise concept for adequate signing. Provisions for sign placement and scale, in relationship with building and readability, shall be considered in developing the signing concept. While providing the most effective signing, it shall also be highly compatible with the building and site design relative to color, material, and placement. (1) A sign should express an easy to read, direct message -- keep it simple. Brand names of merchandise shall not be displayed. (2) A storefront should not have more than two signs -- one primary and one secondary. The secondary sign shall be pedestrian in scale and not visible from motorists on Foothill Boulevard. (3) Signs may identify only the firm name or major enterprise on the premises on which the sign is located. Material and product advertising shall not be permitted except as primary identification of an establishment. Additional identifying logos of products may be incorporated within the signing but are considered part of the overall allowed sign area. (4) Temporary signs are regulated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinance. (5) Pedestrian-oriented signs may be applied directly to the face of the building and may not exceed City sign area requirements. The shape of the sign can be a positive feature. (6) No signs shall extend higher than the ridgeline of the structure. (7) Window signs should not obscure the display area. The color of the letters should contrast with the display background. Light colored letters or gold- leafed letters with dark borders are effective. (8) All buildings using rear parking lots shall clearly identify their businesses with rear wall signage. All structures shall exhibit clear address information on the front facade (recommended guideline: minimum address number size shall be 6 inches for a one-story building and 10 inches for a two-story building). For night identification, the numbers shall be internally or externally lit. Otherwise all signing shall comply with the Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinance. (9) Existing billboards are regulated by the Rancho Cucamonga Sign Ordinance and new billboards are prohibited by the Sign Ordinance. EQuipment Screenincl. Any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building, or ground, shall be screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally 17.32-46 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 integrated in terms of material, color, shape, and size. The screening design shall blend with the building design. Where individual equipment is provided, a continuous screen is desirable. Facade Articulation. In the case of multi-storied buildings, it is important that they relate to the pedestrian. ,All ground story facades shall be designed to relate to a pedestrian scale. This can be accomplished through breaking the facade into bays and the signage brought down in size and location. Pedestrian scale along Foothill Boulevard shall also be established through the use of pedestrian arcades and awnings which add horizontal articulation to facades. Comtomporary stree{ light with Formal street Iree Restaurant with banner planting comer access and · ' awnings Signal Fountain/water container element Street seating 2 story building with planted terraces - retail at ~treet FACADE ARTICULATION 17.32-47 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.050 The Pedestrian Experience. Architecture and outdoor space along Foothill Boulevard shall be integrally designed and oriented toward the pedestrian experience. The experience should be visually diverse, stimulating, and include activities that create a sense of variety and excitement. (1) Site buildings to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand the existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard. This is accomplished by creating ptazas and allowing wider sidewalks on Foothill Boulevard. (2) Site and design buildings to minimize pedestrian/vehicle conflicts and avoid locating driveways and service areas which interfere with the flow of Foothill Boulevard pedestrian movements. (3) Site and design structures to facilitate public access across sites where important pedestrian connections occur. Mid-block passageways from rear parking lots can be created through a fully developed internal paseo system. 11. Streetscape Design Details. Streetscape Furniture. This streetscape furniture/material palette depicts the elements to utilize along Foothill Boulevard. All furniture that is connected to the sidewalk shall be connected with shear bolts and not have concrete or other footings. This matrix applies to all of Foothill Boulevard. It should be noted that these furniture selections are for future direction only. It is not intended to be a final selection. The City may want to select other furniture as appropriate and necessary. Median Lighting Drinking Fountain Planter Urban Node Bench Parking Bench Lighting Lighting Parking Lot Lighting Trash Recepfical Bollard Tree Grate Bollard Trash Receptical Enriched Paving Broom Finish Concrete r~ -.. ,consistent "i:'- - '" 'with the If:'" ..~. 'architecture palette Primary Entry Sign Planter STREETSCAPE FURNITURE/MATERIAL PALETTE 17,32-48 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.070 Streetscape Lightin(]. It is the intent of streetscape lighting to add a consistent, planned look for Foothill Boulevard during daylight hours and evenings. Lighting can have a dramatic affect on the quality of streetscape design. All lighting fixtures in the public right-of-way shall be consistent and approved by the City Engineer following the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Materials should be consistent and in keeping with the desired theme. Luminaries, poles, and supporting hardware should also be consistent. All development areas outside the public right-of-way shall use high pressure sodium lighting. All direct: light rays shall be confined to the limits of the building site. Streetsca13e Color Coordination. In order to aid in design continuity along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, significant portions of all street furniture shall be finished with a unifying color. A color shall be selected which will exhibit the same characteristics on a variety of materials (concrete, wood, metal, etc.) and provide a noticeable color element along the streetscape. Section 17.32.060 - Trip Reduction A minimum of one shower facility, accessible to both men and women, shall be provided for persons walking or bicycling to work for each project which meets the following thresholds: Commercial 250,000 square feet Industrial 325,000 square feet Office 125,000 square feet Hotels and Motels 250 rooms Section 17.32.070- Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines The portion of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Interstate 15 was not part of the original Foothill Boulevard Study area; therefore the provisions of the original Specific Plan did not apply to development within this "Missing Link.' Subsequently, the Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines were prepared in order to provide specific streetscape design provisions through those portions of the Terra Vista and Victoria Planned Communities and the Industrial Districts. The Foothill Boulevard Design Guidelines, therefore, extend the concepts of the original Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan through the "Missing Link," thereby creating a dynamic concourse with a unifying community design image reflective of the community heritage and identity. Activity Centers: Activity Centers are selected intersections along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor defined as "Theme" or "Statement" areas which "tie" together the visual aspects of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor through the city, promote concentrated activity at these areas, and give identity and theme to the areas in which they are located. The Activity Centers are located contiguous to Foothill Boulevard as indicated in the following drawing: 17~32-49 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.070 ACTIVITY CENTERS Because three corners of the Haven Avenue intersection are fully or partially developed, the development provisions of the Activity Center are limited to those streetscape and landscape improvements within the public right-of-way. Therefore, many of the following standards apply only to the Milliken Avenue and Rochester Avenue Activity Centers: 1. Streetscape All building orientations will relate to the Foothill Boulevard frontage. The building setback areas will be enhanced pedestrian zones with special hardscape materials, formal landscape arrangements, and pedestrian-level lighting. bo Streetscape elements such as bollards, crosswalks with special paving materials, light standards, and street furniture should be uniform throughout the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. The concept within the activity center is to incorporate a formal, regularly spaced, street tree planting system utilizing a palette of informally shaped, colorful trees. The urban or formal streetscape design characteristic of the activity center should extend along Foothill Boulevard and secondaw/intersecting streets to a point of logical transition to the suburban parkway. Typically, the design will extend to at least the first driveway or' as modified through the design review process. The extent of the urban streetscape should be able to adjust to changes in public right- of-way conditions such as right turn lanes and bus bays. 2. Site Planning At activity centers, buildings may be placed at or adjacent to the front setback line to create a more appealing, active streetscape. Front yard areas of parking lots dominating the streetscene are specifically prohibited. Multi-stow buildings shall be designed to relate to the pedestrian level. All ground stow facades shall be designed to relate to the human scale. This can be accomplished through the breaking of facades into bays and the signage brought down in size and location. Further, this reduction in scale can be established through the use of elements which add horizontal articulation to the facades. 17.32-50 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.070 Examples of these elements include pedestrian arcades and awnings. (Milliken & Rochester Avenues only.) Buildings shall be designed to eliminate a fragmented, strip commercial appearance and should be oriented to the activity center (Milliken & Rochester Avenues only). Architecture and outdoor spaces along Foothill Boulevard shall be integrally designed and oriented toward the pedestrian experience. The experience should be visually diverse and stimulating and should include activities that create a sense of variety and interest (Milliken & Rochester Avenues only). Structures, pathways, and landscaping shall be incorporated within the site so as to ensure ease of access from one site to adjoining sites in a safe manner. Building entrances shall be designed to accommodate logical pedestrian access from the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. This may include direct entrances from Foothill Boulevard, separations in the buildings that allow access to the interior plaza areas, or other appropriate methods. 3. Architectural Concept Within an individual activity center, the architectural style should be consistent to provide continuity of design at the intersection. Milliken Avenue Activity Center- The development review process will establish the flavor for the area when reviewing development proposals. New developments need not 'duplicate" the architectural style of previous submittals but must be compatible in terms of architecture and orientation with the other corner(s) of the intersection. Rochester Avenue Activity Center - New proposals shall consider and respect the architectural style of existing buildings. For example, the Aggazzotti Winery at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue is a potential National Historic Registry candidate. Any proposals for this Activity Center should be designed to be compatible with this structure. This does not mean that new proposals must emulate the architectural style of the winery but, rather, that they must complement existing buildings. Differentiate the ground floor facades from the second floor in recognition of the differences in the character of activities at the ground floor level. Examples include, but are not limited to, the use of storefront glass, stepped-back or tiered forms, fenestration, and other appropriate architectural features facing Foothill Boulevard, Milliken Avenue, and Rochester Avenue. Landscape Concept: The activity centers shall be distinguished from suburban (informal) parkway areas through the use of formal, urban tree plantings. These formal plantings shall border all activity centers and shall define these areas as being higher intensity, urban districts. The plantings shall consist of an offset double row of Crape Myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica) trees along each road frontage. Additional plant materials (evergreen canopy trees, palms, etc.) may be introduced to supplement the Crape Myrtle as a backdrop. The type and location of the additional materials should be based on the particular building design, scale, and setback. 17.32-51 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.070 B. Suburban Parkwavs: 1. Streetscape. The parkways will be designed with informal clusters of trees, rolling turf berms, and meandering/undulating sidewalks evoking pastoral, suburban qualities. Streetscape elements such as bollards, crosswalks with special paving, light standards, and street furniture shall be identical in style and finish to those used in the Foothill Boulevard corridor. 2. Architectural Concept: The architectural characteristics shall be governed by the existing standards of the Development Code, Terra Vista Community Plan, and Victoria Community Plan. In situations where buildings are highly visible from the side streets and/or adjacent parking areas, special emphasis shall be placed on creating architectural interest. Landscape Conceot: The plantings will consist of informal treatments, dominated by London Plane (Platanus acerifolia), California Sycamore (Platanus racemosa), and Flowering Plum (Prunus cerasifera) trees. Other species may be used to accent and/or supplement these designated tree types. The type and location of these species should be reviewed in conjunction with :specific development proposals. Go Parkway Transitions: In order to provide a gradual transition from the urban activity centers to the suburban, informal parkways, "parkway transitions" will be introduced along the corridor. Parkway transitions are designed to b~lend the formal hardscape and tree planting pattern of the activity centers with the informal landscape and hardscape treatment of the suburban parkways. Specifically, the parkway transition is characterized by a 75- to 150-foot zone, dominated by Flowering Plum trees. Other tree species may be introduced to supplement the Flowering Plum to assist in creating a smooth transition. Please refer to the illustration shown in Section 17.32.050. D.5. D. General Guidelines: 1. Site Planninq: ao Buildings shall be sited to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand the existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard. This can be accomplished by creating plazas and allowing wider sidewalks on the boulevard. Buildings shall be designed and placed to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. Driveways and service areas shall be located to avoid interfering with the flow of pedestrian circulation in and around the site. All auto related facilities (i.e. working bays, storage, etc.) shall be oriented/screened away from public view. Buildings should be oriented to encourage restaurants, services, limited retail uses (as permitted by the applicable Community Plan or Chapter 17.30), and other high intensity pedestrian uses on the ground levels of all buildings within activity centers. 17.32-52 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.070 2. Parkine Lots: Whenever possible, entries shall be located on side streets in order to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. When this is not possible, the Foothill Boulevard site entry shall be designed with appropriately patterned concrete or pavers (behind the public right-of-way) to differentiate it from the sidewalks. Parking access points, whether located on Foothill Boulevard or side streets, shall be located as far from street intersections as possible. Parking areas shall be designed so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving vehicles and minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross parking aisles. Individual project parking areas shall be linked with on-site driveways which are clearly identified and easily recognized as connectors. New development projects shall delineate on all plans. where vehicular connections to adjacent properties are located. The applicant must also demonstrate provisions for access easements for such vehicular movements to adjacent properties consistent with approved master plans. Parking areas shall be designed in a manner which link the building to the street sidewalk system to encourage and facilitate pedestrian movement. This can be accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and/or landscape treatments. 3. Landscape Desi(~n: All street furniture, light standards, bollards, and similar hardware within 10 feet of the public right-of-way shall be painted a color chosen as the Foothill Boulevard Corridor Theme Color. Sign faces may vary and match related architecture. A colorful landscape edge. shall be established at the base of buildings. Asphalt edges at the base of structures are prohibited. Plant materials in containers are appropriate. Internal pedestrian circulation, linking office complexes with neighboring commercial or office developments, should be located close to buildings. Planting clusters should assume a non-uniform arrangement. The diversity of massing types should be great enough to provide interest but kept to a level which evokes a relaxed, natural feeling to the observer. Water conserving plantings and irrigation should be used in all landscaped areas. (Refer to City Ordinance No. 411 -Xeriscape.) 4. Streetscaoe Li(~htin(~: It is the intent of streetscape lighting to add a consistent, planned look for Foothill Boulevard during day and evening hours. Lighting can have a dramatic effect on the quality of the streetscape design. All lighting fixtures in the public right-of-way shall be consistent along Foothill Boulevard and approved by the City Engineer following recommendations of the 17.32-53 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.070 Planning Commission. Materials shall be consistent and in keeping with the desired theme. Poles and supporting hardware shall be consistent with City standards. All development areas outside the public right-of-way shall use high pressure sodium lighting. All direct light rays shall be confined to the limits of the building site. E. Foothill Boulevard Circulation ImDrovements Center Median Proqram - Based upon traffic analyses, a continuous 14-foot wide raised landscaped median shall be provided on Foothill Boulevard. The median can provide benefits necessary to accommodate increased development and traffic demand through increased vehicular capacity, increased vehicular/pedestrian safety, increased vehicular mobility, and increased vehicular level of service Median breaks shall occur only at major signalized intersections as determined by the City Engineer. Alternate median breaks may be considered subject to a detailed traffic analysis and subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Median Desiqn - The 14-foot wide median shall be designed to provide access control and a unifying landscape statement. The median will feature basic types of planting. Accent tree planting (Crape myrtle), underplanted with a low evergreen groundcover, will be provided as median noses. Evergreen trees (Rhus lancea), underplanted with shrubs and groundcover, will be planted throughout the balance of the median. F. Foothill Boulevard Site DeveloDment Standards 1. Setbacks - Activity Center (Suburban Parkway in Parenthesis) Building Streetsidem l't Floor 2"~ Floor Foothill Boulevard/Milliken Avenue Activity Center: Foothill Boulevard 25 feet 25 feet* (45 feet) Milliken Avenue 25 feet* 25 feet* Parkinq 45 feet (45-foot average, 30-foot minimum) 45 feet (45-foot average, 30-foot minimum) Foothill Boulevard/Rochester Avenue Activity Center: Foothill Boulevard 25 feet 45 feet* (45 feet) 45 feet (45-foot average, 30-foot minimum) Rochester 25 feet* 45 feet* Avenue 45 feet (45-foot average, 30-foot minimum) (1) As measured from ultimate curb face Refer to Section 17.30.040, Terra Vista Community Plan or Victoria Community Plan for additional regulations. 17,32-54 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.070 60' 35,]'-' 1:1 Building 8etba4k I!a~ ./ ~fJd $toi3r Permitted at tdlllkon 70' Activity Center Building Setback Rear Property Line Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development Interior Side Property Line Adiacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development Building Perking 25 feet* 15 feet* 0 feet* 5 feet* Building Perking 25 feet* 15 feet* 5 feet* 5 feet* Refer to Section 17.30.040, Terra Vista Community Plan or Victoria Community Plan for additional regulations. 17.32-55 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 2. Heicjht Limitations - Activity Centers a. Within 45 feet of street curb face: Foothill Boulevard (at Milliken) Foothill Boulevard (at Rochester) Milliken Avenue Rochester Avenue 35 feet 20 feet 35 feet 20 feet Within 100 feet of single family residential district 25 feet Other locations ( * ) Towers, campaniles, rotundas ( * ) * Refer to Section 17.30.040, Terra Vista Community Plan or Victoria Community Plan for additional regulations. Section 17.32.080 - Subarea Development Standards This Section provides development standards for the individual subareas of the Foothill Boulevard Districts. The purpose of preparing subarea development standards is to identify the most prominent development standards applied within each of the four subareas in the Foothill Boulevard Districts. For each subarea the following categories have been identified and discussed: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Background Activity Center Area Building Siting Architectural Imagery Landscape/Streetscape Imagery Community Design Palette Land Use Regulations Site Development Standards The list described above does not intend to cover every specific development requirement which may be utilized in developing within the Foothill Boulevard, but does provide a quick overview of the major development considerations within each subarea. Any person interested in developing within the boundaries of the Foothill Boulevard Districts should refer to this Chapter in its entirety for an in-depth discussion of all the development constraints, opportunities, and standards. 17.32-56 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 Cucamonga Creek Channel Baker KI C/) Z _1 17.32-57 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 A. Subarea 1. Backrlround: Subarea 1 is the least "linear" subarea within the Foothill Boulevard District boundary. Land uses currently cover a spectrum of intensities, from single-family to medium-density residential structures, as well as office and commercial uses. Because of the variety of existing land uses, and the future emphasis on specialty commercial uses, it is logical to delineate this area as a "village." A large portion of this "village" is physically removed from the remainder of Foothill Boulevard by a railroad trestle bridge and a large natural land form (Red Hill) in the central portion of the subarea. The Sycamore Inn and Magic Lamp restaurants are the most architecturally distinctive buildings in the area. Their location and proximity to one another provides the basis for the activity center of "Bear Gulch." The scale of these restaurant structures will keynote future architectural harmony for Bear Gulch Village. Other buildings are not as architecturally significant. Significant numbers of sycamores are found in this subarea, as well as a proliferation of the use of river rock in a number of structures. Many negative aesthetic features exist in this area as well. Least-appealing is outdoor storage visible from Foothill Boulevard. SUBAREA 1 - DESIGN ANALYSIS MAP Activity Center Area: The Community Design Plan for Bear Gulch Village will relate to all properties in the shaded area. 25-foot building setbacks; Pedestrian scale architecture; Semi-formal landscape arrangement; Accent trees; 17.32-58 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 e. Village streetscape vocabulary; and f. Rear and side parking. SUBAREA 1 - ACTIVITY CENTER MAP o Building Sitinq: The concept for this activity center is to reinforce existing restaurant use with similar and complimentary uses. Building setbacks along Foothill Boulevard will be reduced to 25 feet from the curb (13-foot parkway and 12-foot setback from property line). Architectural scale is to remain at a ~village" scale, one-story along sidewalks, with two- story structures allowed beyond the 50-foot setback (38 feet from property line) limits. Parking lots between the front property line and major structures, are strongly discouraged. Front setbacks for parking areas shall be 45 feet from the ultimate curb line (33 feet from property line). An 8-foot sidewalk will be located behind a 5-foot turf strip. The remaining land area within the front setback shall be either informally landscaped or an additional hardscape area expanded, depending upon proposed building entries, windows, and walls. The sidewalk material shall be a "medium broom" finish, terra cotta colored concrete. Natural colored concrete is not recommended due to its highly reflective nature, lack of interest, and inability to carry through the desired "village" design concept. 'There will not be a requirement for existing structures and parking lots to comply with these new standards. Only new development and redevelopment of the exterior facade shall incorporate these setbacks and design concepts into their designs. 17.32-59 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code "~ 3'~7~ zo,~..~------ 25'0" building setback from curb "~,~o.w ~"~.- 25'0" second story setback t Sections 17.32.080 8'0" wide walkway 5'0" turf stdp Major tree Calif. Sycamore (irregularly spaced) NOTE: .. Shaded areas behind R.O.W. line depicts landscaped or pedestrian hardscape surfaces Architectural ImagerY: All buildings should project a design vocabulary sensitive to the architecture of the Sycamore Inn and Magic Lamp, which includes multiple low-pitched roofs, traditiona~ window shapes and placement, porches, arcades, and porticos. Overall sca~e should relate to the pedestrian, with a decidedly intimate "human scale." Buildings over two stories in height are not recommended in the activity center. Various architectural details, forms, materials, and colors are appropriate if they harmonize with the basic materials and color palette for Bear Gulch Village summarized in the Community Design Palette and the General Design Guidelines of Section 17.32.050. 17.32-60 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 Gentle Roof Pitch Muid-Paned Windows Multi-Planed Roofs __ Deep Porch Simple, Unadorned Porch Colurns Board and Batten Siding LandscaDe/Streetsca13e Imaqery: The sequence of views upon entering Rancho Cucamonga at Grove Avenue will shape the opinion of motorists as the quality of the city they are entering. Therefore, the importance of the imagery of landscape and streetscape elements is paramount in Bear Gulch Village. The concept within the activity center area is to incorporate an informal street tree planting system utilizing an informally shaped, colorful street tree palette. The trees (Sycamores and Crape Myrtle) are to be planted in an informal arrangement inside the property line. 6. Community Desiqn Palette: a. Architectural Character Determinant. Sycamore Inn (landmark) Wall Materials: Textured stucco Stained or painted woods (clapboard or board and batten) Brick Cobblestone, river rock, fieldstone Roofs/Pitches: Gable, hip or shed roofs Pitch 3:12 to 6:12 Wood shingle Slate Metal (colored earthtones) Accents: Exposed rafter tails Warm color accents Towers, cupolas, rotundas, and campaniles Multi-lighted windows Vine arbors Curved parapet walls Covered walkways Awnings 17.32-61 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 Scale: Two-story heights with the first floor oriented towards the pedestrian. Colors*: Warm earthtones with bright color accents White (stucco only) *These color ranges are examples and only encourage to be utilized. b. Landscape Architectural. Crape Myrtle (secondary activity node) Sycamore (primary activity node) Carolina Laurel Cherry (major median species) Flowering Plum (secondary suburban parkway and median accent tree) In order to prevent a barren: wintertime street scene, street, parkway, and median trees have been selected to avoid a completely deciduous palette. Activity center trees planted in informal styles shall be at a minimum of 30-inch box size in order to achieve a sufficient height for clear visibility under the canopy. Land a. Use Regulations: Primarv Function/Location. This subarea is located contiguous to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor between Grove and Vineyard Avenues. It will act as a major gateway into the community, dominated by a Specialty Commercial Activity Center, (Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road) designed as the primary activity center within the subarea. In addition to the public hearing and notification requirements of Section 17.02.110, additional notification of all property owners within the Foothill Boulevard subarea in which the property under review is located is required. b. Permitted and ConditionalIv permitted uses: Refer to Table 17.32.030-A. 17.32-62 ~99 Sections 17.32.080 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 5. Site Development Standards ~ Subarea 1. a. General Provisions: Site Development Sections 17.32.080.A.9.b and c relate to the land within the activity center only. Site Development Standards relating to other land use districts within Subarea 1 shall conform to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and the standards listed in Sections 17.32.080.A.9.d. and e. Site Dimensions and Height Limitations: Activity Center. Feature Minimum Developable Area Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Height Limitations: a) Within 50 feet of street yard curb face 20 feet 20 feet b) Within 100 feet of a Residential District (SFR) 25 feet 25 feet c) Other Locations 35 feet 35 feet d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 45 feet 45 feet Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) 40% 40% Minimum On-Site Landscaping (includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, 15% 15% courtyards, and patios) Land Use SC CC 1 acre 2 acres 1 acre 2 acres 200 feet 200 feet 175 feet 175 feet Setbacks. Activity Center Yard Building Parking Street Yard (measure from face of 1st 2nd the ultimate curb) Floor Floor · Foothill Boulevard 25 feet 50 feet 45 feet Rear Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned 25 feet 15 feet Residential Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned 0 feet 5 feet Commercial Development 17.32-63 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Yard Interior Side Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development d. Site Dimensions and Height Limitations. Parkway Feature Minimum Developable Area Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Height Limitations: a) Within 50 feet of street yard curb face b) Within 100 feet of a Residential District c) Other Locations d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) Minimum On-Site Landscaping (includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, courtyard, and patios Open Space Setbacks. Parkway Yard Building Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb) 1st Floor · Foothill Boulevard 45 feet · Other 35 feet Rear Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential 25 feet Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned 0 feet Commercial Development Sections 17. 32.080 Building Parking 25 feet 15 feet 5 feet 5 feet Land Use O MR 1 acre 1 acre 200 feet 175 feet 20 feet 20 feet 25 feet 40 feet 35 feet 45 feet 45 feet 40% 40% 15% 45% Parking 45 feet avg - 30 feet min 35 feet avg - 25 feet min 15 feet 5 feet 17,,32-64 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 Interior Side Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential 25 feet Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 5 feet 15 feet 5 feet 17.32 -65 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 IJJ Z 17.32-66 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 B. Subarea 2. Back0round: Subarea 2 is the smallest subarea within the Foothill Boulevard District boundary. The Thomas Brothers Winery, which is located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue, is one of the few historical structures in the corridor. Research into the regional history of the Cucamonga area has led to the establishment of a Rancho Cucamonga Heritage image which reflects the agricultural heritage of the entire region. The activity center in Subarea 2 is located at the intersection of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The parcels located in this area are currently designated "CC", Community Commercial, and "SC", Specialty Commercial. The remainder of Subarea 2 is composed of relatively new development, completed under pre-Foothill Boulevard zoning. There is very little vacant land within this subarea. The small amount of vacant land which exists is in the activity center at Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. SUBAREA 2 - DESIGN ANALYSIS MAP 17.32-67 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 Activity Center Area: The Design Plan for the urban activity center located at Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard will relate to "CC" and "SC" land use designations. tII i! "'~ San Bernardino Road '-'-'"'?-'-' :':'":"'""""" '.' '-''' ,-'7~ ;. ,-{.:-I -'-':~-':':':':':':':'-'" "'"' ' :.:.:-;. -3..~.-~--. .;:~:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:- .-'-: *. ',2;":. . ';'"_~_''-~L" ===================== .:.:.,: .::.-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ;i::::i :::i:~:i:i:~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::'::: FoOthill :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: tl I I "~" /l~- i/ SUBAREA 2 - ACTIVITY CENTER MAP Building Siting: The concept for this activity center is to concentrate specialty commercial and community commercial uses at the intersection of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Building setbacks along Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue are to be 25 feet minimum from the ultimate curb line. All off-street parking is to be set back at least 50 feet from the ultimate curb line. Parking lots located between the front property line and major structures are strongly discouraged. In addition, building masses should not have large expanses of parking located between structures. The environment on each of these properties should be conducive to pedestrian movements from major parking areas to commercial establishments. Due to the depths of these properties it is impractical and wasteful to require all buildings to be located on the front setback line. However, all sites should have some building or portions of buildings located on the front (street) setback line; consistent with site development standards for these properties. 17.32-68 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 Corntemporary street light with Formal street tree Restaurant with banner planting comer access and · · awnings Signal Fountain/Water container element Street seating 2 story building · ~lh planted tenaces - retail at street FACADE ARTICULATION Architectural Imagery: As previously mentioned, the Thomas Brothers Winery is the style determinant in this subarea. The main buildings at the Thomas Brothers Winery do not portray "special" architectural features other than a grape arbor and multiple shed roofs. Investigations into the architectural heritage of winery buildings suggests that the structure is representative of the California Barn Style (see sketch). The simple, clean ~ines of the barn in profile provide an almost unlimited range of architectural expressions. 'The barn silhouette is universally recognized as a symbol of the winery culture and is uniquely suited to serve as the primary architectural prototype for this subarea. Repeated use of building materials, color, and basic architectural elements, can be expanded so that proposed buildings can be designed in harmony with the basic contextual "feel" of the winery. 17.32-69 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 ----" ..~ Barn Roof Shapes ~ Mull~-Pla~,,d Roof Exposad R;dter Tails . .. . : ,: :....~, .... ,_ ,RoofOverHangs 7~ ..... ~ Simple Stucco Walls LandscaDe/StreetscaDe Imaqerv: The concept within the activity center area is to incorporate a formal, regularly spaced street tree planting system utilizing an informally shaped, colorful street tree palette. The trees are to be planed 30 feet on center and are to be placed between 2 to 5 feet inside the property line (see illustrations Section 17.32.050.D). Community Desion Palette: a. Architectural Character Determinant. Thomas Brothers Winery Wall Materials: Textured stucco, smooth stucco Clapboard, board and batten siding Vertical wood siding Brick Cobblestone, river rock, fieldstone Roofs: Gable, hip, or shed roofs Pitch - 3:12 to 6:12 Wood shingle Slate Metal (colored earthtones) Accents: Vine arbors, covered walkways Roof overhangs over entries Multi-lighted windows Porches Exposed rafter tails 17.32-70 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 Scale: One to two-story heights with towers, pergolas, campaniles. Colors*: White to off-white Beige, sand, warm earth tones Pastels with primary color accents *These color ranges are examples and on~y encourage to be utilized. b. Landscape Architectural. Crape Myrtle (primary urban activity node and median species) Honey Locust (secondary urban activity node and median species) London Plane Tree (primary suburban parkway and median species) Carolina Laurel Cherry (major median species) Flowering Plum (secondary suburban parkway and median accent tree) In order to prevent a barren wintertime street scene, street, parkway, and median trees have been selected to avoid a completely deciduous palette. Activity center trees planted in a regimental style shall be at a minimum of 30-inch box size in order to achieve a sufficient height. 7. Land Use Regulations - Subarea 2. Primary Function/Location. This subarea is located contiguous to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor between Vineyard and Archibald Avenues. It contains a variety of land use activities, including the Thomas Brothers Winery, which prevails as the Subarea Activity Center. In addition to the public hearing and notification requirements of Section 17.02.110 additional notification of all property owners within the Foothill Boulevard subarea in which the property under review is located is required. b. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses. Refer to Table 17.32.030-A 8. Site Development Standards - Subarea 2. General Provisions: Site Development listed in Sections 8b and 8c below relate to land development within the activity center only. Site Development Standards relating to other land use districts within Subarea 2 shall conform to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and the standards listed in Sections 8d and 8e below. b. Site Dimensions and Heiqht Limitations: Activity Center Feature Minimum Developable Area Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Land Use SC* 1 acre 1 acre 200 feet 175 feet CC 2 acres 2 acres 200 feet 175 feet 17.32-71 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32.080 Height Limitations: a) Within 50 feet of street yard curb face b) Within 100 feet of a Residential District (SFR) 25 feet 25 feet c) Other Locations 35 feet 35 feet d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 45 feet 45 feet Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) 40% 40% Minimum On-Site Landscaping (includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, 15% 15% courtyards, and patios) 20 feet 20 feet Because of the historic significance of the Thomas Brothers Winery, the development standards of the SC District properties adjacent to the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue shall be established through the design review process. The development standards may exceed the limitations listed in Sections 8b and 8c by Conditional Use Permit process when necessary to preserve the historic and/or aesthetic qualities of the site. c. Setbacks. Activity Center" Property Line: Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commemial Development Interior Side Property Line: o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development Yard Building Parking Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb) 1 st Floor 2nd Floor · Foothill Boulevard 25 feet 50 feet 50 feet · Vineyard Avenue 25 feet 50 feet 50 feet Yard Building Parking Rear 25 feet 15 feet 0 feet 5 feet 25 feet 15 feet 5 feet 5 feet Because of the historic significance of the Thomas Brothers Winery, the development standards of the SC District properties adjacent to the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue shall be established through the design review process. The development standards may exceed the limitations listed in Sections 8b and 8c by Conditional Use Permit process when necessary to preserve the historic and/or aesthetic qualities of the site. 17.32-72 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code d. Site Dimensions and Height Limitations. Parkway Feature Minimum Developable Area Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Height Limitations: a) Within 50 feet of street yard curb face Within 100 feet of a Residential District b) c) d) Other Locations Towers, campaniles, rotundas Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) Minimum On-Site Landscaping (includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, courtyard, and patios Open Space MHR Section 17.32.080 Land Use O MR 1 acre 1 acre 20 20 20 feet feet feet 25 feet 35 40 35 feet feet feet 45 45 45 feet feet feet 45% 40% 15% 45% Setbacks. Parkway Yard Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb) · Foothill Boulevard · Other Rear Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development o Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development Interior Side Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development Building 1 st Floor 45 feet 25 feet 25 feet 0 feet 25 feet 5 feet Parking 45 feet avg - 30 feet min 35 feet avg - 25 feet rain 15 feet 5 feet 15 feet 5 feet 17.32-73 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.080 Hem Z 17.32-74 6/99 ..... Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.080 C. Subarea 3 Backclround. Subarea 3 is the most varied and eclectic subarea. It contains the "central" activity center at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue. This activity center, known as the Cucamonga Towne Center, will be more urban in nature than all other activity centers along Foothill Boulevard. Land uses vary considerably within this subarea, with small- to medium-sized commercial uses dominating the central portion of the Subarea. ' R&RKIKG DOMINATES -- ....~~ -I ~ i CENTER [TO llr[MA)N) L.,,.J" [~ I-~ WES... T.EMS COM.EiqCl.l.I. ~ i ('To sE I,,TSO~*'r.D ,.TO t Foe{hill Biv SUBAREA 3 - DESIGN ANALYSIS MAP Activity Center Area. Unlike any other subarea, Subarea 3 has two activity centers located within it. The first activity center is located at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue. Its boundaries are irregular and do not correspond to a land use district, but generally relate to the CC and $C land use designations. 'The second activity center is located at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue. This is referred to as the Hermosa Intersection. It is a minor center with less formality than the Cucamonga Towne Center. The Community Design Plan for this minor activity center will relate to the CC and CO land use designations. 17..32-75 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.080 ..... Foothill Blvd. sUB-AREA 3 - ACTIVITY CENTER MAPS Buildinq Sitinq. The concept for the Cucamonga Towne Center is to create a retail commercial core which emphasizes pedestrian circulation. This will be accomplished by promoting building clusters with parking lots located away from pedestrian travel routes. Building setbacks along Foothill Boulevard will be 25 feet from the curb with hardscape and landscape predominant. Parking is prohibited in the front setback areas. Setbacks for the second and third stories of any building located in this activity center are 50 and 60 feet, respectively. Ground floor courtyards or plazas on private property are encouraged. The intersection at Archibald Avenue will become the primary focus for Foothill Boulevard. Buildings at this location should incorporate architectural features which emphasize urban qualities. Features will include corner cut-offs and vertical elements such as towers, flagpoles, trellis structures, etc. In the activity center, no setbacks are required at the side or rear property lines for buildings located on the 25-foot front setback line; in order to encourage a continuous row or cluster of buildings sited in the activity center with parking located between the primary structure entry and the street shall provide full side and rear-yard setbacks. 17.32-76 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.080 Awnings over Single Story Festive 'Re~mil at StreetRetail/Restaurants at Pedestrian I .Streel Promenade ' Bollards __ Comer ' Plaza Wall Material Architectural Imaqerv. The objective at this section is to upgrade design quality and image as existing structures are removed or redeveloped. The architectural context for the Cucamonga Towne Center will be to create an intimately-scaled retail district that will emphasize the quality of the pedestrian shopping experience. Elements which help achieve this "scale" include facade composition, rooflines, doors, windows, walls, awnings, colors, materials, and finishes. · ':: I I I ::' II I ' Stucco Walls Board and Brick River Rock Batten Roofs Details Gable Roof Hip Roof Barn Shed Pitch Roof Rafter Tails Towers Arbors Multi Parted Windows Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.080 ~ Landscal~e/Streetscape Imagen/. The landscape/streetscape concept within Cucamonga Towne Center is highlighted by a formal, double-row street tree planting utilizing an informally-shaped, colorful street tree. Landscape and hardscape materials are selected to perform a variety of functions; including improving and softening building appearance, improving street appearance, and promoting sound absorption. The double row of trees promotes an "urban image" which acts as a counter point to suburban oriented themes. This urban accent will remain predominant throughout the planning area. In addition to the double row of trees on Foothill Boulevard, an equally urban palette of shrubs, turf, potted plants, attractive paving, benches, lighting, and other elements will make the pedestrian streetscapes attractive and usable. Sidewalks located within the Cucamonga Towne Center contiguous to Foothill Boulevard will extend from turf islands to building walls. To avoid any design/safety problems with Caltrans, a double row of trees shall be planted on private property. The trees are to be planted in a regimental fashion (see graphic in Section 17.32.050 for clarity). The sidewalk material shall be a "medium broom" finish, incorporating a terra cotta color. Single-Story Retail/Re~urants at Street Festive Pede~'o~an Promenade Bollards Comer Plaza Minor Citv Entry. Located due east of Center Avenue is Day Creek. Numerous functional improvements have been made to the creek channel itself, as well as the inclusion of landscape and hardscape improvements. This location is considered a minor entry portal to the City. 17.32-78 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.080 7. Community Design Palette. Architectural Character Determinate. Contemporary interpretations of the winery or barn prototypes: Wall Materials: Textured stucco Smooth stucco Stained or painted woods (clapboard, board & batten) Brick Cobblestone, river rock, fieldstone Roofs/Pitches: Gable, hip, or shed roofs (flat roofs may be appropriate for three-story structures only) Pitch - 3:12 to 6:12 Wood shingle Slate Metal (colored earthtones) Accents: Exposed rafter tails Warm color accents Towers, cupolas Multi-lighted windows Vine arbors Curved parapet walls Covered walkways Awnings Scale: Three-story heights with the first floor oriented towards the pedestrian. Colors*: Warm earthtones with bright color accents Pastels White (stucco only) *These color ranges are examples and only encouraged to be utilized. b. Landscape Architectural. Crape Myrtle (primary urban activity node and median species) Honeylocust Gleditsia Triacanthos (secondary activity node and median species) London Plane Tree (primary suburban parkway and median species) Carolina Laurel Cherry (major median species) Flowering Plum (secondary suburban parkway and median accent tree) In order to prevent a barren wintertime street scene, street, parkway, and median trees have been selected to avoid a completely deciduous palette. Urban activity node trees planted in a regimental style shall be a minimum of 30-inch box in size. 17.32 -79 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.080 8. Land Use Regulations - Subarea 3 Primary Function/Location. Subarea 3, located contiguous to the Foothill Corridor between Archibald Avenue and Deer Creek Channel, contains a variety of commercial, office, and residential land uses ranging from Low-Medium Residential uses to higher intensity Community Commercial uses. This Subarea also contains a Mixed-Use district composed of Convenience Commercial and Medium-High Density Residential uses,. A community activity center will be located at the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Foothill Boulevard, designed to increase Subarea 3 identity. In addition to the public hearing and notification requirements of Section 17.02.110 additional notification of all property owners within the Foothill Boulevard subarea in which the property under review is located is required. b. Permitted and ConditionalIv permitted uses: Refer to Table 17.32.030-A 9. Site Development Standards - Subarea 3 General Provisions. Site Development Sections 17.32.080.C.8.b.& c. relate to land development within the activity center only. In general, the affected land use districts and associated parcels are located at the intersections of Foothill Boulevard/Archibald Avenue; and Foothill Boulevard/Hermosa Avenue. Site Development Standards related to the remainder of Subarea 3 shall conform to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and the standards listed in Sections 8d and 8e below.. 17.32-80 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.080 I I .'.'.'.'.'.' .'.'~g.'.'.%' ,~'~t.'.~'.'~ / · · .M. · ~'~ · ~ ~ ~ ~,'.~ .% · , · ~ .... ~=:r- n ......~:,: '.a~.". ~. ~ GM..~.,. ~ .... ,~ ~h .~r ...... 0.4 ..... ..... ~..~~-/..~.-.-~.~;, ~ ~,.'~'~-- ............... ............ ............. t' '~( ~ ............ ............. I., ~$ ........$ ........ ,...,....,.,,t,~vk.. .... ..~.,...... .............. ....... ......... jJ ' - T"'l ~ ., .:.:-:.:.:-' .-:-.' ~ - ' II -.' ,i~--.'--: ·..~........:~...~.:.-. · ~ ~.- '- :4 .'.-. '" .: -:.: ~ -:-' '.:-:,:-:.:...-..:.:.::.:... _ ~ L_I...~..:~.....-...:.:...:.::~LI~:. _~_~ SUBAREA 3 - ACTIVITY AREA MAPS 17.32-81 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code b. Site Dimensions and Height i. !?,itations. Activity Centers Section 17.32.080 Feature Minimum Developable Area Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth Height Limitations: a) Within 50 feet of street yard curb face b) Within 100 feet of a Residential District (SFR) c) Other Locations d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) Minimum On-Site Landscaping (includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, courtyards, and patios) Setbacks. Activity Center Land Use SC CC 1 acre 2 acres 1 acre 2 acres 200 feet 200 feet 175 feet 175 feet 20 feet 20 feet 25 feet 25 feet 35 feet 35 feet 45 feet 45 feet 40% 40% 15% 15% Yard Building Street Yard (measure. from face of 1st 2nd the ultimate curb) Floor Floor · Foothill Boulevard 25 feet 50 feet · Archibald Avenue 25 feet 50 feet Yard Building Rear Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development Interior Side Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development Parking 45 feet 45 feet Parking 25 feet 15 feet 0 feet* 5 feet 25 feet 15 feet 5 feet* 5 feet In the activity centers, no setbacks are required at the side or rear property ~ines for buildings located O__Qn the 25-foot front setback line; in order to encourage a continuous row or cluster of buildings at the street frontage. Buildings sited in the activity centers with parking located between the primary structure entry and Foothill Boulevard shall provide full 10-foot side and rear-yard setbacks. 17.32-82 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.080 Site Dimensions and Height Limitations. Parkway Feature Minimum Developable Area Minimum Lot Size Minimum Lot Width Minimum Lot Depth b) c) Height Limitations: a) Within 50 feet of street yard curb face Within 100 feet of a Residential District Other Locations d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) Minimum On-Site Landscaping (includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, courtyard, and patios Open Space CO 1 ac 1 ac 200 feet 175 feet 20 feet 25 feet 35 feet 45 feet 40% 15% CC 2 ac 2 ac 200 feet 175 feet 20 feet 25 feet 35 feet 45 feet 40% 15% Land Use MR 2O feet 35 feet 45 feet 45% Residential Development 45% Commercial Development 15% Setbacks. Parkway Yard Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb) · Foothill Boulevard · Archibald Avenue · Other Building lstFIr 2ndFIr 45 50 feet feet * 45 50 feet feet ** 35 feet *** MU LMR 5 ac 5 ac 5 ac 5 ac 20 feet 35 feet 45 feet 40% 15/ 45%* 45% 2O feet 35 feet 45 feet 40% 45% Parking 45 feet 45 feet 35 feet 17.32-83 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32.080 Rear Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development Interior Side Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development * 45 feet avg - 30 feet rain ** 45 feet avg - 30 feet min *** 35 feet avg - 25 feet rain 25 feet 0 feet 25 feet 5 feet 15 feet 0 feet 15 feet 5 feet 17.32-84 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32.080 17.32-85 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32. 080 . ~ 17.32-86 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32. 080 Day Creek Southern California Edison 17.32-87 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32. 080 D. Subarea 4 Back(Iround. Subarea 4 is the final subarea within the Foothill Boulevard corridor and is physically separated from the other subareas. This physical separation, however, should not be allowed to disrupt the overall design continuity of Foothill Boulevard. This "Eftwanda Gateway" subarea is the least urban of the four subareas. Structures in the area do not currently have strong architectural style or thematic sense. This Subarea serves as a major entry into the Foothill Corridor, and as such, should project a strong design image. As the stone curbing along Eftwanda Avenue has been recognized as a unique historic feature, all new development shall be required to restore and/or reconstruct the stone curbing from Foothill Boulevard north to 24th Street (Wilson Avenue), in conformance with adopted City Standards acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Activity Center Area. The Community Design Plan for the urban activity center will relate to the CC, and RRC land use designations at the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Subarea 4 is much less urbanized than the other three subareas. Due to the amount of vacant land and non-descdpt architectural legacy, there was no purpose in developing a design analysis map. However, all of the architectural, landscape architecture and streetscape elements will come directly from the other subarea to ensure the design continuity of Foothill Boulevard. Unlike the other activity center Foothill Boulevard, the activity center at Etiwanda will not require detailed pedestrian amenities. Itis recommended that landscape and rolling berms be utilized instead of hardscape materials. SUBAREA 4 - ACTIVITY AREA MAP 17.32-88 6~99 ..... Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32. 080 I r~ ~1 Foothill Boulevard I SUBAREA 4 - ACTIVITY CENTER Buildin.cl Sitin.q. The concept for the Etiwanda Gateway is to create character which portrays a regional commercial oriented image. Building setbacks along Foothill Boulevard will be 25 feet from the curb, with hardscape and landscape treatments predominant in this area. Parking is prohibited in this 25-foot setback area for properties at this intersection. Architectural Imaclerv. As with other subareas, no fixed architectural "style" is mandated for the Etiwanda Gateway area. Buildings in this area should reflect the community design palette established generally for Foothill Boulevard. This palette incorporates the architectural "models" provided for by the Thomas Brothers Winery and Sycamore Inn. Buildings and structures shall incorporate such architectural elements as brick, wood, tile, and stucco details in order to maintain a "human" scale within this regional oriented area. Cement block, tilt-up concrete, and similar :industrial-type" materials are prohibited from the activity center properties. LandscaDe/Streetscaoe Imaclerv. The landscape/streetscape concept for the Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard Intersection node is the same as the concept for Cucamonga Towne Center with the exception of pedestrian amenities. Community DeskIn Palette. Architectural Character Determinant. Contemporary interpretations ofthewinery or barn prototype: Wall Materials: Textured stucco Smooth stucco Stained or painted woods (clapboard, board and batten) Brick Cobblestone, river rock, fieldstone 17.32-89 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32. 080 .... Roofs/Pitches: Gable, hip, and shed roofs (flat roofs for three-story structures only) Pitch - 3:12 to 6:12 Wood shingle Slate Metal (colored earthtones) Accents: Exposed rafter tails Warm color accents Towers, cupolas Multi-lighted windows Vine arbors Curved parapet walls Covered walkways Awnings Scale: Three-story heights Colors*: Warm earthtones with bright color accents Pastels White (stucco only) *These color ranges are examples and only encourage to be utilized, b. Landscape Architectural. Crape Myrtle (primary urban activity node and median species) Honeylocust (secondary urban activity node and median species) London Plane Tree (pdmary suburban parkway and median species) Carolina Laurel Cherry (major median species) Flowering Plum (secondary suburban parkway and median accent tree) In order to prevent a barren wintertime street scene, street, parkway, and median trees have been selected to avoid a completely deciduous palette. Activity center trees planted in a regimental style shall be at a minimum of 30-inch box in size. Northwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue. This site has been selected for a Neighborhood Commercial use with specific intent to allow for partial preservation of the existing Eucalyptus grove. The site plan for such use shall incorporate as many existing trees as possible, but no less than 60 percent of the area of grove nor less than 25 percent of the trees. Provisions shall also be made for a 20-foot wide Greenway through the interior boundary near the northwest corner of the site for future connection to the Community Trail system and Miller Park. Land a. Use Rec~ulations - Subarea 4 Primary Function/Location. Subarea 4 is located contiguous to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor between the I-15 Freeway and East Avenue. Subarea 4 acts as 17.32-90 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17.32. 080 a major gateway into the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is characterized by a variety of commercial, residential, industrial uses, and mixed use/residential. Regional related uses will be provided adjacent to the Devore Freeway, designed to compliment the Victoda Gardens Regional Shopping Center. In addition to the public headng and notification requirements of Section 17.02.110, additional notification of all property owners within the Foothill Boulevard subarea in which the property under review is located is required. b. Permitted and ConditionalIv Permitted Uses: Refer to Table 178.32.030-A. 8. Site Development Standards - Subarea 4 General Provisions. Site Development Sections 8b and 8c below relate to land development within the activity center only (located at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Eftwanda Avenue). Site Development Standards related to other land use districts within Subarea 4 shall conform to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, Industrial Districts, and the standards listed in Sections 8d and 8e below. Site Dimensions and Heiqht Limitations. Activity Center Land Use Feature CC RRC Minimum Developable Area 2 ac 5 ac Minimum Lot Size 2 ac 5 ac Minimum Lot Width 200 feet 200 feet Minimum Lot Depth 175 feet 175 feet Height Limitations: 20 feet 20 feet a) Within 50 feet of street yard curb face b) Within 100 feet of a Residential District 25 feet 25 feet c) Other Locations 35 feet 35 feet d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 45 feet 45 feet Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) 40% 40% Minimum On-Site Landscaping (includes articulated plazas, hardscape areas, turf areas, courtyards, 15% 15% and patios) c. Setbacks. Activity Center Yard Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb) · Foothill Boulevard · Etiwanda Avenue Building Parking 1st 2nd Floor Floor 25 feet 50 feet 45 feet 25 feet 50 feet 35 feet 17.32-91 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Section 17. 32. 080 Yard Building Parking Rear Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development 25 feet 15 feet · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 0 feet 5 feet Interior Side Property Line: · Adjacent to Existi:ng or Planned Residential Development 25 feet 15 feet · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development 5 feet 5 feet d. Site Dimensions and Height Limitations. Parkway Land Use Feature RRC CC LI MR Minimum Developable Area 5 ac 2 ac 1 ac Minimum Lot Size 5 ac 2 ac 1 ac Minimum Lot Width 200 200 200 feet feet feet Minimum Lot Depth 175 175 175 feet feet feet Height Limitations: 20 20 20 a) Within 50 feet of street yard curb face feet feet feet b) Within 100 feet of a Residential 25 25 25 District feet feet feet c) Other Locations 35 35 35 35 feet feet feet feet d) Towers, campaniles, rotundas 45 45 45 45 feet feet feet feet Maximum Site Coverage (net lot area) 40% 40% Minimum On-Site Landscaping (includes articulated plazas, hardscape 15% 15% 15% areas, turf areas, courtyard, and patios Open Space 45% e. Setbacks. Parkway Yard Street Yard (measure from face of the ultimate curb) · Foothill Boulevard 17.32-92 Building 1st Fir. 45 feet Parking 45 feet 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Yard · Other Rear Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development Interior Side Property Line: · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Residential Development · Adjacent to Existing or Planned Commercial Development * 45 feet avg - 30 feet min ** 45 feet avg - 30 feet rain Sections 17. 32. 090 Building Parking 35 feet 35 feet* 25 feet 15 feet 0 feet 5 feet NA NA 5 feet 5 feet Section 17.32.090 - Implementing Strategies The following Implementing Strategies are actions which are beyond the power of the Development Code and their enactment will occur by "separate acts". Economic Develo~)ment Strategies. This section outlines the Economic Development Strategy incorporated along with the Foothill Boulevard Districts. These efforts are intended to provide the framework for financing area public and private improvements, which can bring the circulation and design components of the district concept to reality and establish other mechanisms which will ultimately promote the viability of business activity along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. In following brief notes on the purposes of an economic development strategy, the discussion turns to five key components which constRute the economic blueprint for the planning area. Each component is described in terms of it feets rationale, potential phasing, private and public responsibilities, and appropriate funding sources. An Economic Development Strategy is but one part of the overall Foothill Boulevard District concept, though it is crucial to achieving a land use pattem which is viable in the marketplace while supporting the design objectives of the corridor. It is one of the focused blueprints for implementation of goals and objectives. In addition, it functions as a coordinating device between such features as traffic, design image, and land use. Finally, it enumerates the various administrative and financial resources which will be required for effective implementation. Economic development covers just one of the many policy blueprints necessary to bdng the district feets design, land use, and circulation sections into reality. Policies aimed toward retail and service land use, eventually will be evaluated not so much for their popular appeal, but whether or not they were carried out in practice and strengthened the local community. Therefore, this strategy is grounded in the findings of an earlier economic analysis conducted under the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan program and in the goals and objectives established with citizen input. 17.32-93 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17. 32. 090 Finally, an Economic Development Strategy enumerates the conditions under which vadous types of public assistance may occur. It also specifies what is expected of both private and governmental participants in the implementation process. Because resources for implementation are always limited, it is essential to prioritize objectives for the future and to reexamine these as time brings changes to the Rancho Cucamonga area. An underlying philosophy for economic development along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor is that commercial proposals should be initiated by the private sector. Local government participation primarily will be used to provide a receptive climate in response to those, proposals and to install special mechanisms that foster private action among retail and service businesses. Implementation policies may be divided into two types; administrative mechanisms and financial incentives. Some changes in the administrative climate for economic development are generally necessary to make use of specific incentive devices. Moreover, local government policy should give priority to improving the climate for the local economy rather than on the provision of financial subsidies. Redevelopment Project Area Amendment. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has supported the concept of redevelopment through formation of a project area that extends over much of the study area lying between Vineyard Avenue and the 1-15 Freeway. The Redevelopment Agency has amended its original plan to include a provision for Foothill Boulevard improvements, contemplating potential public participation in areas where such participation might be necessary to properly plan for and develop portions of the project area. The amendment increases the agency increment financing potential, its bonding capacity, and its time limit for implementation. This plan amendment provides the opportunity for the Redevelopment Agency to consider targeting specific public actions commensurate with its ability to finance the same. Consideration of such options should commence with a special report to the Redevelopment Agency outlining areas of potential public involvement, potential costs and priorities. This report will address such potential policy areas as: Participation in underwriting of certain street and intersection construction and reconstruction in identified problem areas b. Public design treatment as a positive force c. Elimination of physical obstacles to private redevelopment d. Public participation in parcel consolidation e. Joint public-private participation ventures f. Applicable financing programs g. Redevelopment program schedules The central aim of this policy is to provide a mechanism for public participation in areas where public action is necessary to eliminate major obstacles to the proper development of the corridor and to help provide better physical relationships to encourage future economic investment. 17.32-94 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code 2. Sections 17. 32. 090 Infrastructure UDgradin(~. Creating an enhanced economic climate for Foothill Boulevard requires public sector commitments as well as private activity. This can include, where appropriate, such items as drainage improvements, street widening, and intersection reconstruction. Marking key entdes to Rancho Cucamonga with "gateway" design elements is treated elsewhere in the corridor although it is tied to other infrastructure upgrading. Storm drain and related flood control investments are the heart of the infrastructure improvements. In order of possible phased development, specific improvements proposed for the plan area are: Hermosa Avenue area storm drain (from Deer Creek to Ramona along Foothill) $988,000. Archibald Avenue storm drain $2,943,000. Hellman Avenue storm drains, including connector with Cucamonga Channel $3,372,000 d Foothill Boulevard and East Avenue $1,809,000 e. Etiwanda Creek area approximately $3.3 million Funding for improvements number a. through c. and e. above can come from a Redevelopment Agency bond issue or a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. The Melto-Roos Act has become a significant method of financing public capital facilities serving new development through bond issues authorized by special taxes. Since the Etiwanda Creek area will be among the last land areas in the corridor to undergo development, the City will continue its drainage fee collection system and will examine the possibility of either assessment district proceedings or a separate redevelopment bond ilssue as future land use needs are more clearly defined. Incentive Program for Small-lot Consolidation. The Foothill Boulevard Districts recognizes that problems of traffic congestion and marginal land use are often associated with a pattern of small commercial land parcels. Highly fragmented ownership and land use arrangements also seriously hinder plans for renovation or expansion of businesses operating within such areas. "'['herefore, an incentive program for small-lot consolidation along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor will be established. Assistance to support lot consolidation would apply only under the following conditions: a. Three or more legal parcels are involved in the consolidation; and b. None of the parcels alone exceeds one-half acre in size; and Plans are submitted for a new development which exceeds the combined valuation of the land and improvements on the affected properties. The Redevelopment Agency can work with applicants on lot consolidation on public improvements within the project area to stimulate eventual recycling of existing uses. These would be applied on a case-by-case basis, depending on the current pattern of 17.32-95 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17. 32. 090 development and the proposals submitted. In addition, the City will consider potential property acquisition for common parking areas to provide additional development potential for properties with difficult site co~nstraints. Appropriate target areas for this program are sites between Grove and the railroad undercrossing, from Hellman to Klusman, and between Hermosa and Center. Attraction of Hiqh Sales Volume/Market Void Uses. A market analysis prepared during the preparation of the original Specific Plan process identified a number of retail and service activities which are under-represented in the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. Efforts to attract these land uses should be made to the extent that they would compliment rather than compete directly with land uses planned for the Victoda Gardens Mall and its immediate surroundings. This will be an ongoing implementation activity, having a greater potential for positive results after infrastructure improvements are in place and local populations rise than if tackled early in the life of the corridor. Types of businesses which would be targets of the marketing effort include high sales tax and employment generators. In order for this economic development program to be successful, it will be necessary to make corridor sites more attractive to private investment than sites in the immediate vicinity of the regional mall. The use of the redevelopment process and land assembly (with available funds) may need to be a part of this effort. Initiate a Small Business Assistance Promram. New business promotion and redevelopment activity do not mean that the needs of existing Foothill Boulevard Corridor retail and service outlets will be neglected. The Foothill Boulevard Districts is committed to strengthen the operation of those firms which are viable contributors to serving neighborhood and community-wide consumer demands. ~n order to assist the small business sector, the Redevelopment Agency will work toward establishing a program for use by businesses to finance facade upgrading and on-site improvements. The program would be open to owners of commercial property, and loans would be available for up to 80 percent of the authorized improvements, not to exceed $50,000.00 per property. Interest rate on the loan shall be pdme rate. "]'he criteria for improvements to be eligible for the Business Assistance Program are as follows: that improvements promote and are not in conflict with the goals and objectives of this Chapter. Eligible improvements may include costs to repaint, re-stucco, re-roof, upgrade landscaping, resurface parking facilities, or other minor on-site upgrading. That all facade and on-site improvements are approved through the Design Review process. That improvements for non-conforming uses and structures are in conformance with provisions of this Chapter. 17.32-96 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17.32. 090 Addition of new building and site features (not to include additional floor or parking area) which reduce the degree of non-conformity of existing features is encouraged under this program. Other small business assistance programs which the City can investigate includes the establishment of a local development corporation in conjunction with the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce. Seed money for such a venture is available through Community Development Block Grant Section 108 provisions and the Small Business Administration 504 Program. 'The function of this nonprofit organization would be to stimulate the health and expansion of small businesses through low-interest loans or grants. This funding would support: building construction leasehold improvements renovation and modernization machinery and equipment land acquisition CDBG and Small Business Administration regulations each set the criteria for firms that may receive financial aid. For example, eligible businesses must have a net worth of less than $6 million and be the actual user of assets purchased with loan funds. The concept of "shared risk" is advanced as the SBA program will provide loans only up to 40 percent of project costs; owner equity and conventional banldpdvate sector lending must make up the remainder. Promote Housing Opportunities Supportive of Commercial Land Use Incentives. A strong retail and service sector along any major traffic artery draws its life-blood from local and subregional consumer patronage. Both the business community and local government must work diligently to promote shopper use of the Foothill Boulevard Corridor over other alternative destinations. Part of this strategy involves bdnging more residents to the corridor vicinity because existing and planned businesses cannot rely exclusively on through traffic for their viability. The commercial intensity recommended for Foothill Boulevard presents Rancho Cucamonga with a most ambitious land use target to achieve. Attracting patrons from Upland and western Fontana to Foothill Boulevard businesses is not likely to provide a sufficient base of support. Therefore, the City should promote housing development on those properties designated for residential use along the corridor and adjacent areas. Medium Residential land uses are appropriate densities for consideration with the bordering Low Density neighborhoods and as an aid to the business sector viability. Sicin and Street Furniture Maintenance District. The City should consider the establishment of a Maintenance Assessment District for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor which will accumulate funds to improve and maintain public and private signs and appurtenances. The funds will be accumulated by charging a special fee for signs in the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. The fee will be charged at the design review building permit stage. Foothill Boulevard Corridor Color Coordination. In order to induce design continuity along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, the City will begin a painting and clean-up program. 17.32-97 6/99 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Sections 17. 32. 090 All appropriate sign hardware, street furniture, poles, barriers, signal signs and related objects in the public right-of-way of Foothill Boulevard in the study area shall be painted a distinctive and consistent color. City Siqn Locations. In those areas designated as key locations for City signs, (as discussed in Section 17.32.050) the City should proceed to negotiate a least cost use of private property (i.e., lease, acquisition, etc.). 17.32-98 6t99 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 7, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-02 CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to designate the Beckley house as a Local Landmark, located on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street at 6729 Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-08. RECOMMENDATION Approval of Landmark Designation 99-02 by adoption of the attached Resolution as unanimously recommended by the Histodc Preservation Commission and staff. BACKGROUNDIANALYSIS The subject residence was constructed around 1934. The house is a two-story structure composed of native rock on the first floor and stucco finish on the second floor. This structure is a good example of a grove house. It is unique in that it follows the Mission style of architecture, whereas most of the typical grove houses were built in the Craftsman style. The Beckley House certainly qualifies for landmark designation based upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including such significant areas as historical and architectural setting. Details concerning these areas of significance are contained in the Facts of Findings section of the attached Historic Preservation Commission staff report and Resolution dated June 9, 1999, (see Exhibit "A"). Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:SS:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report dated June 9, 1999 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes Dated June 9, 1999 Resolution of Approval CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 9, 1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-02 CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to designate the Beckley house as a Local Landmark, located on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street at 6729 Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-08. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: ANALYSIS: Historic Significance: The subject residence was constructed around 1934. The house is a two- story structure composed of native rock on the first floor and stucco finish on the second floor. This structure is a good example of a grove house. It is unique in that it follows the Mission style of architecture, whereas most of the typical grove houses were built in the Craftsman style. Site Characteristics: The site presents a gentle slope from north to south. In addition to the residence, a detached garage constructed at a later time is set slightly to the east of the main residence. The grove house retains much of its setting because it is centrally located and has been well kept since its construction. The subject property is separated from the adjoining properties by a 6-foot high chain link fence. ANALYSIS: General: The residence is in very good condition with all of the significant extedor features having been retained (Exhibit "B"). The house is a two-story design with a large front porch. The roof is Spanish tile and a combination native rock and stucco on the first and second floor, respectively. The style of architecture used in the house constitutes an example of the use of native materials for the construction of residential homes. Additionally, the house is an example of a well designed mission in its architectural style (Exhibit "B"). Landmark Desionation: The requested landmark designation is for the Beckley House. The subject structure qualifies for landmark designation based upon the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including such significant areas as historical and architectural setting. Details concerning these areas follow: 1. Historical Significance: Finding 1: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. HISTORIC PRESERVATION STAFF REPORT LD 99-02- CURRY BRANDAWARCHITECTS June 9,1999 Page 2 Fact/s: Finding 2: The house identifies the histodc pedod of the eady 1900s when grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the community and the region. The residence is an example of a grove house which was common at the turn of the century. The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common, but is now rare. Fact/s: The landmark eligible property is 65 years old and is an example of using native materials for the construction and design of a mission style of architecture. Finding 3: The proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and farm houses. 2. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: Findinn 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed Landmark is beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. Fact/s: The residence is a two-story structure in the Mission Style of architecture. The exterior of the house is composed of native rock on the first floor and stucco on the second floor. In general the architectural style further enhances the historic character of the buildings in the area. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Class 3.e of Article 19, Section 15308 of the Guidelines for the California Environmental Quality ACt. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission approve the attached Resolution Recommending Approval of Historic Landmark Designation 99-02 to designate the Beckley House as an Historic Landmark to the City Council. City Planner BB:SS:Is Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Location Map Exhibit "B" - Photos Resolution Recommending Approval to the City Council HIGHLAND STREETCan~ ~~ AVENUE ~.'-.-~, ""'-'-- ~ "" / "' '~ "~ '~ "'- EXISTING SITE PLAN STREET .! Chairman McNiel asked if there was a need to import the dirt. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that he could not answer the question b, familiar with the grading plans. Chairman McNiel added that this project was not designated under th~ Ordinance. Chairman Macias asked if the Building Official would verify the Mr. Bullet stated a soil analysis as well as grading check.~ be completed and verified. Chairman Macias asked for confirmation that this take place and if it would be part of the public headng process. Mr. Buller confirmed that it would take would not be part of the public review. He added that the final grading plans go through plan check. Phases I and 2 were per plan and that 3 and 4 would be per Department would certify the grading had been done correctly )ers. seconded by Macias to adopt the resolution approving 99-03. Motion carried by the following vote: MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY -carried Commissioner Mannedno stated plan as well and that the and that they do check Motion: Moved by Development Re~ AYES: NOES: _ ABJ: NONE: he is not PUBLIC HEARINGS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the General Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related files: Development Distdct Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02. (Continued from May 12, 1999) Eo ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the Development District zoning designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: General Plan Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued from May 12, 1999) Planning Commission Minutes -5- ~/¢ June 9, 1999 Fo ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW' ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a two-story residential care facility for the eldeHy totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development District Amendment 99-02, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02. Chairman McNiel reminded the Commissioners that they had agreed to hear Item A from the Histodc Preservation agenda, Histodc Landmark Designation 99-02, in conjunction with General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-08. Sal Salazar, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and noted that he had received favorable calls from neighbors and that one resident in opposition of the project was in attendance. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Garth Brandaw, Holiday Retirement Homes, 2260 McGilchdst Street, SE, Suite 100, Salem, Oregon, stated their company operates 220 retirement facilities. He commented that he felt their plans are compatible with the other uses surrounding the project and is pleased with the fact that they had been able to provide over 50 percent open space on the developed site as well as being able to intertwine the historic residence and adjacent orange grove in with the development. He added they had kept a strong residential scale to the project and that they were not heady as institutional as other facilities of this kind. Mark Hodbek, 10089 Mignonette, Rancho Cucamonga, raised concern about the Initial Study and the related impacts. He thought this project will change the character of the neighborhood. He noted that the PUD, apartments, and the park have all impacted the tract on the west side of Hermosa and he did not like the idea of adding more density to the area. He felt this facility is a commercial enterprise and that it would violate the current zoning for the site and asked for clarification of the same. He thought public services will be significantly impacted because there is no control of the traffic and he felt the noise impact will be severe. He added that he had counted 13 burned out street lights and that he felt the existing neighborhood had been ignored and dumped on. He concluded by saying he felt the project does not reflect, or is sensitive to, the existing neighborhood. Commissioner Macias asked how the residents would get around town. Mr. Brandaw said that most of the residents are in their seventies or early eighties and that they most likely would be living alone and only about 20 percent of them would still be driving and their trips would be limited. He indicated that even if there are 2 persons in each suite, the project would still have fewer trips than what would be used by 23 single family dwellings. He added that the trip times for these residents is not typically during peak periods and with only 12-16 staff members, the parking demands are low. Mike Robbins, 9920 19th Street, Rancho Cucamonga. reported that the temple is located near another facility of this kind and that they have been a good neighbor and that his experience with this type of use has been good. Planning Commission Minutes June 9.1999 Mike Jumper, 666 Bdssac Place, Rancho Cucamonga, asked how many suites would be in the facility. Mr. Brandaw indicated 114 suites. Mr. Jumper asked how you get 114 suites with a zoning of only 4-8 dwelling units per acre and felt this might be like another apartment building with more people per acre. He added that he did not like zoning changes. Brad Bullet, City Planner stated that some sites can have alternative land uses and that it may not be solely based upon density depending upon the use and that the number of rooms is not related to the land use category. He explained that with a Conditional Use Permit, which is discretionary, the Planning Commission evaluates the project to see if it fits into the existing neighborhood. He stated this project would not be permitted under the Low Residential category but that it can be permitted under the Low-Medium Residential category. Chairman McNiel commented that his Mother-in-law had resided in this kind of facility for 3-4 years and that few people came to visit. He pointed out that the people there were always quiet, trouble free, that they caused no problems and that it was actually a benefit to lhe neighborhood because there were no calls about loud music, graffiti, or extra noise in the street. He confirmed his belief that this is a good use. Mr. Jumper acknowledged the point was well taken but then asked what would happen if the developer left and if the building could become apartments or some other use at a later time or if more units could be added at a later time. He added that he wished the property could stay the way it is or become single family homes. Mr. Buller advised him that this use could not be modified and that the Conditional Use Permit would be revoked under those circumstances. Hubert Surki, 10223 19th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he lives just east of this development and that he never received notification. He reported the traffic on 19th Street is very noisy especially at rush hour and with big dgs traveling 19th Street all day long. He cited noise from the school traffic as well as the park traffic would not be pleasing to the residents of this facility. He asked how far from 19th Street the facility would be as well as how many parking spaces would be available. Mr. Salazar responded by saying that sound mitigation would be in place and that a noise study would be required. He also stated that one parking space for every 4 beds were required totaling 29 required spaces and that 67 spaces are provided, so that even if there were 2 beds per suite, it would exceed the requirement. Mr. Buller mentioned that Mr. Surki would have liked the developer to approach him and ask him his thoughts about the project. He recalled meeting Mr. Surki at the previous Planning Commission meeting and noted that Mr. Surki did receive the notice of the public hearing but was hoping to meet the developer and review the plans. Rich Underwood, 10203 Ring Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, commented that he liked the look of the project but wanted to know the age requirements for the residents and if there will be CC&Rs. He also commented that one gets used to the noise but that he hopes the traffic will lighten up after the freeway is completed, relieving some of the high use travel on 19th Street. Planning Commission Minutes -7- June 9,1999 Mr. Brandaw stated that the lease agreement states 65 years of age as the minimum but due to ADA regulations, they have to make a reasonable accommodation if for example an otder person has a spouse under the age of 65. He added that their lease provides three meals per day, transportation, and housekeeping and that the age of the residents is self regulating because with those kinds of services, younger folks would generally not want to live there. Chairman McNiel asked if it is based more upon their ability to function. Mr. Brandaw replied that the health of the resident is determined and taken into account. Mr. Bullet noted that a condition could be placed stipulating seniors 65 years of age and above to help regulate, but that since it is a Conditional Use Permit, we can consider additional conditions at a later time if it should become a problem. Chairman McNiel commented on the activities in the adjacent park and pointed out that another facility of this type is located next to Red Hill Park on Base Line Road, which is a very busy street. He remarked that the seniors in that facility often sit on their balconies and watch the baseball games. He also noted that the noise study had not yet been completed. Commissioner Macias concluded that the residents that live there will adjust to their community just as well as anyone else. He said it is their choice to live there, it is their choice to open or close the windows, watch tv inside, or go outside and listen to the noise. He felt they are not going there to die but are going to go there to enjoy the remainder of their lives and they will adjust to their community. Hearing no further comments, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Stewart reported that she and Commissioner Tolstoy sat on Design Review together for this project. She asserted that the applicant was careful to design the project to be compatible with the neighborhood and that more senior housing is an identified need in Rancho Cucamonga. She also noted that typically the residents travel in groups and that they use very few cars and that with the land use change there is actually more open space than with some other use. She remarked that this applicant was even willing to preserve a historic home and that the Conditional Use Permit allows the Planning Commission leverage and that it can be revoked later if it became necessary. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Macias to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration of Environmental impacts and to adopt the resolutions recommending that the City Council approve Historic Landmark Designalion 99-02, General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-08. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE -carried ........ .,.t .~= ~-u;> - rncml,~A~tJ:z. - A request tu leuuL. e trle corner s~de yard setback ~'ro[~, the required i'5 feet [a~ ,, .... :..~,~ Ir"nrn nr0oerty line) to 5 feet to construct an accessory structure to be used as a pool house in the Very LOw r'~,~.,;J...'.':"l r~;,:trir-t (up to 2 dwelling Planning Commission Minutes -8,- June 9,1999 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION 99-02, TO DESIGNATE THE BECKLEY HOUSE (BUILT IN APPROXIMATELY 1934) AS AN HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TH STREET, AT 6729 HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09. A. Recitals. 1. Curry Brandaw Architects on behalf of the property owner has filed an application for an Histodc Landmark Designation as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation request is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 9, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. On July 7, 1999, the City Council held their meeting and approved Landmark Designation 99-02. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to the Beckley house located on approximately 5.1 acres of land, basically a rectangle configuration, located at 6729 Hermosa Avenue. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council, including the minutes of the public hearing by the Historic Preservation Commission on June 9, 1999, written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: a. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact/s: The house identifies the historic period of the early 1900's when grove and vineyard production was at its peak in the community and the region. The residence is an example of a grove house which was common at the turn of the century. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LD 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS July 7, 1999 Page 2 Finding 2: The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common, but is now rare. Fact/s: The landmark eligible property is 65 years old and is an example of the use of native materials for the construction and design of a mission style of architecture. Finding 3: The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common, but is now rare. Fact/s: The residence is indicative of the style and design used by the once prevalent, but now rare, rural grove and farm houses. b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. Fact/s: The residence is a two-story structure in the Mission Style of architecture. The exterior of the house is composed of native rock on the first floor and stucco on the second floor. In general, the architectural style further enhances the historic character of the buildings in the area. 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as Landmark Designations are exempt under CEQA, Section 15308 Class 3.e. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommends approval of Landmark Designation 99-02 subject to the following condition of approval: Planning Division: 1) This Landmark Designation shall become effective on August 21, 1999, or 45 days from the first reading of Development District Amendment 99-02, whichever occurs first. 6. The mayor shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: July 7, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the General Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Development District Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the Development Distdct zoning designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: General P~an Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a two-story residential care facility for the eldedy totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Re~ated files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development District Amendment 99-02, and Histodc Landmark Designation 99-02. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends approval of General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-08. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 99-02, DDA 99-02, & CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS July 7, 1999 Page 2 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At its June 9, 1999 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the approval of the subject General Plan Amendment, Development Distdct Amendment, and Conditional Use Permit. During the meeting there were a total of five residents that presented testimony regarding the project. Two residents spoke in favor of the project. Two expressed concerns about the land use density and the proximity of the project to 19th Street. One resident was in opposition and did not support the project. For detailed information please find the attached Planning Commission minutes. Additional background and staff analysis of the project are contained in the attached Planning Commission staff report of June 9, 1999. FACTS FOR FINDING The Planning Commission findings are contained in the attached staff report of June 9, 1999. If the City Council concurs with the findings of the Planning Commission, it may adopt them for its actions on these applications. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:SS:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 9, 1999 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated June 9, 1999 Resolution of Approval for GPA 99-02 Ordinance for DDA 99-02 Resolution of Approval for CUP 99-08 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w STAFF REPORT DATE: June 9, 1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the General Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the Development District zoning designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to the Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a two-story residential care facility for the elderly totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street -APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development District Amendment 99-02, and Landmark Designation 99-02. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Project Density: Proposed General Plan and Development District regulations will allow the development of 4-8 dwelling units per acre of land. Presently 2-4 dwelling units per acre are authorized. Additionally, the developer is proposing to construct a new two-story building totaling 51,095 square feet, to be used in conjunction with the 2,097 square foot existing single family home to operate a residential care facility for the elderly. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North Single family residential; Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units/acre) South Park and school; Open Space District East Single family home; Low Residential Distdct (2-4 dwelling units/acre) West Single family homes; Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units/acre) _.2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-02, DDA 99-02, & CUP 99-08- CURRY BRANDAWARCHITECTS June 9,1999 Page 2 General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) North Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units/acre) South - Open Space (Park and School) East Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) West Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units/acre) Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Number Parking Spaces Spaces of Use of Beds Ratio Required Provided Residential Care Facility 114 1/4beds 29 67 Site Characteristics: The site is located on the southeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue. Hamilton Street is located on the south side of the property. The site is presently improved with a single family dwelling unit which has a Potential Local Landmark designation and citrus groves. The site consists of a single parcel approximately 5.1 acres in size and gently slopes from north to south. ANALYSIS: Ao Background: The project was reviewed at a Pre-Application Review workshop on November 10, 1998. The Commission offered favorable comments regarding the architecture for the building and site planning. A copy of the minutes is attached (Exhibit "J"). General: The developer is proposing to change the land use and zoning designation of the property, from Low Residential to Low-Medium, in order to allow the use and construction of a residential care facility on the subject s~te. The residential care facility is a conditionally permitted use in the Low-Medium Residential District. The project, as proposed, will have a total of 114 suites for the elderly. The suites are similar to an apartment unit without a kitchen. The retirement facility will have centralized services to provide three meals daily, housekeeping, laundering, private bus transportation, and various activities. The facility will be operated 24 hours a day with staff available at all times. The new developer is proposing to construct a two-story building in order to to continue the residential atmosphere of the neighborhood. The developer is also proposing to incorporate the existing single family home into the proposed residential care facility by converting it into the Club House. The exterior of the house would remain as is. Furthermore, the developer recognizes the historical significance of the house and in conjunction with this request, is seeking approval of an Historical Landmark Designation. Currently, the single family home has a Potential Local Landmark designation. The developer is proposing to remove seven palm trees, one fruit tree, and one Eucalyptus tree in order to accommodate the construction of the proposed residential care facility (Exhibit "K"). As required under the tree preservation ordinance, the developer is required to relocate those trees that can be relocated and replace those trees with a tree of similar size PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-02, DDA 99-02, & CUP 99-08- CURRY BRANDAWARCHITECTS June 9,1999 Page 3 for those that can not be relocated. Staff has included a condition in the Planning Commission resolution requiring the developer to submit an arbodst report to determine the replacement value of the trees to be removed or relocated. Appropriateness of the ~3roDosed Low Medium Residential Designation: The subject site is located in the middle of a residential neighborhood. The surrounding properties located on the north side of 19th Street have Low-Medium and Medium residential densities. The surrounding properties located on the south side of 19th Street have a Low Residential land use and zoning designation. The subject 5.1 acre parcel is of sufficient size and configuration to accommodate a high-quality residential project, evidenced by the application submitted for the residential care facility. The use of the single family home is contingent upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development Distdct Amendment 99-02, and Landmark Designation 99-02 by the City Council. Additionally, the Land Use Element of the General Plan indicates that a Low-Medium land use designation would be appropriate within a low density area in order to encourage greater housing diversity without changing the single family character of the surrounding residential area. Therefore, adoption of the proposed Low-Medium land use and zoning designation in conjunction with the retirement care facility would meet one of the goals of the General Plan and would be compatible with the surrounding properties. The proposed residential care facility will provide housing for the eldedy. AooroDdateness of the existing Low Residential Designation: The subject property could be developed under the current land use and zoning district. The property, however, with the proposed development and land use change, will provide a greater amount of open space. The maximum lot coverage under the existing land use designation is 40 percent. The proposed site coverage for the project is 23 percent. Additionally, should the project be developed under the current land use designation, the removal the existing single family home would be required. The existing home is located in the middle of the property. The developer is proposing to incorporate the existing single family home into the development. The home will be converted to the club house. Staff, therefore, is in support of the proposed land use and zone change. Housing: The only housing issue for the application is the increase in the number of available residential units for the elderly once the project is completed. The more intense land use density would result in an increase in the number of future units; however, the increase is not considered an adverse impact to the surrounding properties. Therefore, the proposed land use and zone change would provide greater housing diversity without changing the single family character of the residential neighborhood. Design Review Committee: On June 1,1999, the Design Review Committee (Henderson, Stewart, Tolstoy) considered and recommended approval, subject to minor revisions, of the Site Plan and Building Elevations (Exhibit "1"). Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff has completed Part II. Staff has found that there may be a significant noise impact caused by traffic on 19th Street. The General Plan estimates future noise levels in excess of City standards which requires a detailed study of noise reduction mitigation measures to be included in the construction design, such as sound barriers or special window glazing. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-02, DDA 99-02, & CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS June 9, 1999 Page 4 Therefore, a condition of approval is recommended to require an acoustical report prior to the issuance of building permits. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate FACTS FOR FINDING: Based upon the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following facts for findings regarding these applications: The property is suitable for the uses allowed in the proposed land use and development district designation in terms of access and size with similarly designated parcels. The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions of the Initial Environmental Study that indicate that no significant impacts would be expected because of this land use change. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and the Development Code because of the site's capacity to promote the goals and objectives for a residential development. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development Distdct Amendment 99-02 and Conditional Use Permit 99-08 through adoption of the attached Resolutions. City Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "1" Exhibit "J" Exhibit "K" Resolution Resolution Resolution - General Plan Map - Development Distdct Map - Environmental Initial Study, Part II - Site Plan - Grading Plan - Landscape Plan - Floor Plan - Elevations - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated June 1, 1999 - Pre Application Review Comments dated November 10, 1998 - Proposed trees to be removed Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment 99-02 Recommending Approval of Development District Amendment 99-02 Recommending Approval of Conditional Use Permit 99-08 SUBJECT SITE FROM LOW Jt~,SH)BFFIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM i~smEz~"r. AL LAND USE PLAN RESIDENTIAL liiiiiiiiiiiiiil VER~ L(~W <2DU's/AC F:.:~..'.-::.'.::~.:..':~ LOW 2-4 DU's/AC I~~ LOW-MEDIUM 4-8DU's/AC F'.'.'-'...=-'.'.'./..-'.'..'.'..'.'.~ MEDIUM s-;4 DU's/AC ~i~i~m~ MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU's/AC ~ HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC I! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAP RESIDENTIAL VERY. LOW:/2 t)u/,~c ' LOW 2-4 DU/AC LOW-MEDIUM 4-8 DU/AC ,MEDIUM 6-14 DU/AC MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU/AC HIGH 24-30 DU/AC City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project Files: General Plan Amendment 99-02; Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit No.. 99-08. 2. Related Files: Historic Landmark Designation 99-02, Pre-Application Review 98-08 o Description of Project: A request to change the land use (GPA 99-02) and zoning (DDA 99- 02) designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land and to construct and to operate (CUP 99-08) a two-story residential care facility for the elderly totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in size. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Curry Brandaw Architects 2260 McGilchdst Street, SE, Suite 200 Salem, OR 97302 General Plan Designation: Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Zoning: Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site consists of a single parcel improved with a single family home and an orange grove. The property to the north is improved with a multi-family project and has a land use designation of Low-Medium Residential. The properties to the east and west of the site are improved with single family homes and have a land use designation of Low Residential. The property to the south is improved with a park and school and has a land use designation of Open Space. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Salvador M. Salazar, AICP, Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None 'Initial Study for GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (x) Land Use and Planning ( ) Population and Housing ( ) Geological Problems ( ) Water ( ) Air Quality ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Hazards (x) Noise ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance ( ) Public Services ( ) Utilities and Service Systems ( ) Aesthetics (X) Cultural Resources ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1 ) has been adequately analyzed in an eadier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the eadier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impacf' or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an eadier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. ~. Salazar, AICP L/~s'Sciate Planner May 18, 1999 Initial Study for GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Potentially Issues amd Suppo~:ing Information Sources: Signi~mInt Impact LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? Potentially Significant Impact Less Unless Than Mitigation Signalcant Incorporated Impact ( ) (x) ( ) () ( ) (x) () No lint)act ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a-d) The developer is proposing to change the land use and zoning designation of the property from Low Residential to Low-Medium Residential in order to accommodate the use and construction of a new residential care facility. The proposed Low-Medium land use and zoning designation would meet the goals of the General Plan and would be compatible with the surrounding properties. The Land Use Element of the General Plan indicates that a Low-Medium zoning designation would be appropriate within low density areas in order to encourage greater housing diversity without changing the single family character of the surrounding residential area. Therefore, the proposed request will further the goals of the General Plan. Issues and Supporting Infocreation Sources: POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumuratively exceed official regional or local population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Signifmant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inc~rlx:~ated Impact Imoact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 Issues and Suppo~l~ng Information Sources: GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) h) Expansive soils? ( ) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) Potentially Significant ImDact City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Potentially Significant Impact Lass Unless Than Mitigation Signifmant Inco~o~'ated impact No Impac~ () () (x) () () (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) Issues and Sul:~orting Information Sources: WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, orthe rate and amount of surface water runoff? Potentially Significant Impac~ Lass Unless Than Mitigation Significant No Inc~orooeated Impact Iml~act ( ) ( ) () (x) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? Potentially S~gnifmant Impact Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) () ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: h) i) Potentially Significant Impact i Less Potentially Unless : Than Significant Mifigatio~ Significant No Impact tr',co~d ImDa, ct Im13act Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a) There is no change in absorption rates, drainage patterns or in the rate or amount of surface run-offs covering of the land. Additionally, the developer will be required to submit plans to the Engineering Division in order to ensure adequate drainage for the project. Issues and Supporting h3fon~ation Sources: AIR QUALITY. a) b) c) d) PotentJetty Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Then S~gntficant Mitigatk:m S~lntficant No ImPact I~d Imoa~'t Im13act Would the proposal: Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a) The Project will not cause any impacts to the air quality. No significant air quality impacts would be expected from the development, as the development of the residential care facility will generate fewer vehi,cle trips than a similar sized single family or multi- family residential development. Additionally, the So-'th Coast Air Quality Management District's Air Quality Management Plan accounts for the existing land use designations in its programs. The proposed project changes the General Plan and Development District from Low to Low-Medium Residential. The proposed project will be required to adhere to South Coast Air Quality Management District Regulations. The project is a residential care facility consisting on 120 suites. Furthermore, under the proposed land use designation, should the residential care facility not be built, a maximum of 40 units could be built on this property. According to Table 6-2 of the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, dated November 1993, the threshold of single family homes that could cause a potential air quality impact is 166 homes. Therefore, no increase in air quality impacts is expected from the project. Initial Study for GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Souroes: TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) b) c) d) e) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail or air traffic impacts? Comments: a) Potentially Signitma~t Impact Less Potentially Unless Then S~lnif'mant Mitigation Significem No Impact IncorDonatecI Iml~acl Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) () ( ) () (x) () () () (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) The project complies with all City Regulations including the minimum number of parking spaces and adequate access points. Issues and Suppo~i~'~ Infixmarion Sources: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? Potentially Signif-merit Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Signif'merit Mitigation Sigr~cant No ~m~act Inc. omorated Im~act Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) · Initial Study for GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Comments: a-e) The General Plan and Development Code currently designate the site for residential use and the proposed amendment will continue the residential land use and zoning designation, Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of the development of the site. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. proposal: a) b) c) Would the Pote~iaity SignScant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than Signill.,antMitigationSignificantNo Impact Incomorated Impact Imm~-'t Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner?. ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Issues and Supporting Informatio~ Sources: HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A dsk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? Potentially SignE~.a~t Impact Less Po~antiallyUnless Than S~gnificantMitigation S~grtifipantNo Impact Incorlx~ed Impact Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) 10. Issues and Supporting Informatio~ Sources: NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Potentially Signifycant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignifioantMitigation S~lnificantNo Imoact Incorporat®(IImpact Impact ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Initial Study for GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Comments: a-b) The applicant is proposing to change the land use designation of the property from Low to Low-Medium Residential. No increase in noise levels is anticipated as a result of the proposed land use change; however, the residential care facility proposes to locate an outdoor activity area adjacent to 19th Street. VVhen future expected noise levels exceed 6rLdn, the General Plan requires a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements that should be incorporated into the project design. Staff is recommending that a noise study be prepared to address traffic noise levels in this area and recommend mitigation measures, if any. A condition of approval will be placed in the Planning Commission Resolution which requires the submittal of a Noise Study report for review and approval of by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 11. issues and Supporting Info, marion Sources: PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: Potentially Signif'meat Impact Lass Pote~bally Unte~s Than S~gnificant Mitiga*ion S~gnificant No Impact Incorporated Impact Iml=act a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-e) The proposed project is not expected to have any adverse effects on public services. 12. Issues and Supporting Info~mation Sourc~: UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power' or natural gas? b) Communication systems? c) Local or regional water facilities? d) Sewer' or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? treatment or distribution Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Signif merit No Immlct Incor130rated Imoact Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Issues lind SuppoSing Information Sources: f) Solid waste disposal? g) Local or regional water supplies? Potentially Signifmant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Signif~_,ant MiUgafion Signi~mant Imoact Incomora~ed Impact () () () () () () No (x) (x) Comments: a-g) The proposed project is not expected to have any adverse effects on utilities and service systems. 13. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially SignEdcant Impact Less Po{ontially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inc~l;xx~ted Impact Impact AESTHETICS. Would the proposal.' a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: a-c) The proposed project is not expected to have any adverse effects on Aesthetics. The project is not located adjacent to any scenic vistas or highways. Additionally, the project is required to comply with adhere to all Municipal Code requirements pertaining to minimum lighting levels. 14. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: CULTURAL RESOURCES. a) b) c) d) e) Potentially Significant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Signtf~c. ant Mitigation Signif'mant No allPact Incorporated ImPact Impact Would the proposal: Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: c) The site is currently improved with a single family home that has a Potential Local Landmark (PLL) designation. The developer is proposing to incorporate the existing "Initial Study for GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 single family home into the project. considered to be positive. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Therefore, the impact to historical resources is 15. Issues and Supporting information Sources: RECREATION. Would the proposal.' a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? Pote~ttially Sig~ificent Impact Less Potentia{ly Unless Than Significent M~t~gation Significant No Irnl~act Incomora~ed ' ImPact Im ~c-t ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: a) The proposed project may increase the demand on parks in the area. The project developer will be responsible for payment of park fees at the time of building permit issuance to offset any impact on parks. The impact is not considered significant. Issues and Supporting Informatio~ Sources: 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Potentially SignEtcant Impact Less Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigatio~ Significant No Impacl Ir'4:;~llx~rated Impact lincact () () () (x) () () () (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) u.~, ~o,.~a lt~:, tl:;61~ l. At 503 399 0565 CURRY BRANI)AW SENT BY: R CUCAMONGA COkl DEV; 5-18-99 8:53,; 9094772847 => 503 399 0565; ~003 #~/3 Initial Study for GPA 99-02; DDA 99-02, CUP 99-08 d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or inditeely? City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process. one or more effects have t:~een adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negafiv~ Oeciarat~ per Section 15063(C)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this I:~oject were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal stanclards, anC such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized In completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (x) General Plan Environmental Impact Report (Certifiecl April 6, 1981) (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update ($CH #88020115, certified January 4, t989) (x) Environmental Assessment Part II initial Study for General Plan Amendment 99-02 ana Development District Amendment 99-02 (February 22, 1999) APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that have read this Initial Study arid the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposecl mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where dearly no significant environmental effects would Signature: Print Name a.d 'l ~tle i VICINITY MAP HAMILT(~)N STREET '~-" .....66N-~Sl~'TU^L GRADING PLAI ~///~9~'% ,/ -- -- .... ~-'1 A M ILI~ BTREET I PROJECT SIC~ / I I / LANDSCAPE LEGEND SECOND FLOOR PLAN Rancho Cucamonga Retirement Residence , I TYPICAL SITE SECTION A-A I i L' ~J 5C. ALE : - ., ~ ,~ ..... · ~ , I '~' :1 I J 44'-~" j 44'-~" J 19TH STREET SECTION B-B 5,CALE I PA~ ' = ~-- SITE I I HAMILTON ST, ,~ECT!ON D-D 5C~-E F;~Af~ ELE~'-~*I*ION !! Rancho Cucamonga Retirement Residence DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:20 p.m. Salvador M. Salazar June 1, 1999 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and operate a two-story residential care facility for the elderly, totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in size, in the Low-Medium Residential district (4-8 dwefiing units per acre) on approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development District Amendment 99-02. Background: The project was reviewed at a Pre-Application Workshop on November 10, 1998. The Commission offered favorable comments regarding the architecture and site planning. Furthermore, the Commission added that a use of this nature was needed in Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding communities. Desinn Parameters: The property to the north is improved with a multi-family project. The properties to the east and west of the site are improved with single family homes. The property to the south is improved with a park and school. The project involves development of approximately 5.1 acres of land with a residential care facility. The site has a gentle slope from north to south. The proposed new facility will be two-stories high and approximately 29.5 feet high. Additionally, because of the location of the project, and in an effort to retain the residential atmosphere of the neighborhood, the developer is proposing to retain the existing two-story home on the site. The existing home is a Potential Local Landmark. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Use of River Rock. The developer is proposing to use river rock only on the main entrance of the building. However, staff is recommending that in order to comply with the 360-degree architecture policy, the river rock treatment should be used in all elevations. Additionally, all of the architectural features, including river rock and recommended arches, should be used on all elevations of the covered parking spaces located on the southeast section of the property. Arches. Staff is recommending that, in order to further historical significance, traditional architectural materials and styles be used. The design should incorporate the use of arches to connect the columns along the front elevation. Additionally, all of the windows on the first floor should be redesigned and have a window surround using dver rock similar to the existing dwelling unit. Air Conditioning Units. The developer is proposing to use wall mounted air conditioning units for each suite. However, staff is recommending that these units not be visible from the street. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. Landscaping along the street frontage of the Dro~3erty. Staff is recommending that additional landscape treatment along the street be provided to ensure the parking areas are adequately screened from adjacent street views. Berming in these parking areas shall be a minimum of 3 feet high and have a natural appearance in form. DRC COMMENTS CUP 99-08- CURRY BRANDAWARCHITECTS June 1,1999 Page 2 Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All river rock used in the project shall be native. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the project subject to all recommended modifications. All changes to the development plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to Planning Commission review. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Pam Stewart, Peter Tolstoy, Larry Henderson Staff Planner: Salvador M. Salazar Of the items listed as major issues the applicant agreed to further enhance the building elevations by using dver rock at strategic locations as directed by the Design Review Committee. Additionally, with regards to the covered parking spaces, the DRC agreed with the developer to replace them with carports. The design and style of the carports is required to be similar to the main building, including the use of tile, and dver rock for the columns. The carports, in order to screen the parking spaces, shall have a river rock wall on the south side. With regards to the use of arches, the developer agreed to incorporate them into the building elevations as recommended by staff. Additionally, the arches will be used in all areas where dver rock columns are utilized. Regarding item No. 3. The developer agreed to place the air conditioning units inside the private patios. The air conditioning units, for those units with no pdvate patio, will be placed inside of the wall and will have a maximum visible projection of approximately 6 inches and will be screened by using a metal shield painted to match the color of the wall (stucco or dver rock. With regards to the secondary issues, the applicant agreed to comply with staffs. recommendation. PRE-APPLICAT!ON REVIEW 98-08 - CURRY - The proposed development of a 114 suite retirement residence facility for the elderly on 5.1 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southeast comer of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1076-111-09. Brad Buller City Planner, explained the purpose and goals of the Pre-Application Review process. Michael Fuller, architect for Curry BrandawArchitects, introduced the project and indicated that the proposed retirement residence is a 114-suite facility for the elderly. He explained the facility is designed for the eldedy that are still ambulatory but in need of some support and the residents typically will be single people in theirlate 70s or 80s. Mr. Fuller further stated that his company had researched the area and determined this is the best place to construct the retirement facility. With regards to building design compatibility, he observed the wing ends and building center steps down from two- to one-story. He asserted that this arrangement minimizes impact to the surrounding properties. Additionally, Mr. Fuller indicated that the existing house will remain and will be made part of the proposed development. Salvador Salazar, Associate Planner, commented on the issue of neighborhood compatibility, specifically building design and site layout as it relates to the surrounding properties. He noted that from a design aspect, the building, parking, and open space layout work well with the existing site features including the potential historic house and existing landscaping. Commissioner Tolstoy indicated that the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other communities in the area need this type of facility. He especially liked the open spaco and the preservation of the existing house and landscaping. He felt the two-story building would be compatible with the neighborhood; however, he added that an ememencv exit could be needed alone 19th Street. Commissioner Macias agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy; however, he was concerned about neighborhood compatibility and the number of vehicle trips generated by the use. Commissioner Stewart also felt an emergency exit along 19th Street would be needed. Commissioner Mannerino felt the use is absolutely compatible with the neighborhood. Chairman McNiel felt that the use and the two-story building are acceptable; however, the building architecture needs major improvements. He, too, felt the City should have more of these facilities but reminded the applicant of the land use change process and indicated the Commission will be looking to the neighborhood for thoughts about such a project at this location. Mr. Buller summarized the Commissioners' comments: The use is a welcome use to the City and the proposed project's design appears to fit well into the site, the open sDace allows for the preservation of the existing house and trees, and the building should be no higher than two-stories and have significant architectural movement. He also indicated that the property currenfiy is not zoned to allow this use and an amendment would need to be filed by the applicant. PC Adjourned Minutes STREETCar/ AVENUE 19TH STREET y ......... °< F =' ' '~"~"'~' ~' ""'J' ' ~[//~ -'_'-~_-~_%~, ...... - ~ - ._ ~'~ _ ~=~ =:~:~:~:~:~:~: :~;=:: '-~ ~ ~:' ~-' ~' :~.T., '~ ~ / ~ - "~- ~ - ~ r- ~XISTING SITE PLAN ........ .... HAMIL~ ~T~EET t t Chairman McNiel asked if there was a need to import the dirt. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, stated that he could not answer the question b,~ ~use he is not familiar with the grading plans. . - Chairman McNiel added that this project was not designated under th,~ ' 'dlside Ordinance. Chairman Macias asked if the Building Official would verify the r, ~ding. Mr. Buller stated a soil analysis as well as grading checks' i ould be completed and verified. Chairman Macias asked for confirmation that this wr ;~d take place and if it would be part of the public headng process. Mr. Bullet confirmed that it would take plac,' ',,ut would not be part of the public review. He added that the final grading plans go through = ,norough plan check. Commissioner Mannedno statedt~ -~t Phases 1 and 2 were per plan and that 3 and 4 would be per plan as well and that the Buildl -i.d Department would certify the grading had been done correctly and that they do check the-;:velopers. Motion: Moved by ';annerino, seconded by Macias to adopt the resolution approving Development Rev;~iW 99-03. Motion carded by the following vote: AYES: !~' ~ClAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES:. NONE ABSI='~ i': NONE -carried PUBLIC HEARINGS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the General Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street- APN: 1076-111-09. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related files: Development Distdct Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02. (Continued from May 12, 1999) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the Development District zoning designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 acres of land located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: General Plan Amendment 99-02, Conditional Use Permit 99-08, and Historic Landmark Designation 99-02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. (Continued from May 12, 1999) Planning Commission Minutes -5- ~ ~ w~ June 9, 1999 Fo ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99.08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a two-story residential care facility for the eldedy totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in the Low-Medium Residential Distdct (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street - APN: 1076-111-09. Related files: Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development District Amendment 99-02, and Histodc Landmark Designation 99-02. Chairman McNiel reminded the Commissioners that they had agreed to hear Item A from the Histodc Preservation agenda, Histodc Landmark Designation 99-02, in conjunction with General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development District Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-08. Sal Salazar, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and noted that he had received favorable calls from neighbors and that one resident in opposition of the project was in attendance. Chairman McNiel opened the public headrig. Garth Brandaw, Holiday Retirement Homes, 2260 McGilchdst Street, SE, Suite 100, Salem, Oregon, stated their company operates 220 retirement facilities. He commented that he felt their plans are compatible with the other uses surrounding the project and is pleased with the fact that they had been able to provide over 50 percent open space on the developed site as well as being able to intertwine the historic residence and adjacent orange grove in with the development. He added they had kept a strong residential scale to the project and that they were not neady as institutional as other facilities of this kind. Mark Hodbek, 10089 Mignonette, Rancho Cucamonga, raised concern about the Initial Study and the related impacts. He thought this project will change the character of the neighborhood. He noted that the PUD, apartments, and the park have all impacted the tract on the west side of Hermosa and he did not like the idea of adding more density to the area. He felt this facility is a commercial enterprise and that it would violate the current zoning for the site and asked for clarification of the same. He thought public services will be significantly impacted because there is no control of the traffic and he felt the noise impact will be severe. He added that he had counted 13 burned out street lights and that he felt the existing neighborhood had been ignored and dumped on. He concluded by saying he felt the project does not reflect, or is sensitive to, the existing neighborhood. Commissioner Macias asked how the residents would get around town. Mr. Brandaw said that most of the residents are in their seventies or early eighties and that they most likely would be living alone and only about 20 percent of them would still be driving and their tdps would be limited. He indicated that even if there are 2 persons in each suite, the project would still have fewer trips than what would be used by 23 single family dwellings. He added that the tdp times for these residents is not typically during peak pedods and with only 12-16 staff members, the parking demands are low. Mike Robbins, 9920 19th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, reported that the temple is located near another facility of this kind and that they have been a good neighbor and that his experience with this type of use has been good. Planning Commission Minutes -6- June 9, 1999 Mike Jumper, 666 Bdssac Place, Rancho Cucamonga, asked how many suites would be in the facility. Mr. Brandaw indicated 114 suites. Mr. Jumper asked how you get 114 suites with a zoning of only 4-8 dwelling units per acre and felt this might be like another apartment building with more people per acre. He added that he did not like zoning changes. Brad Buller, City Planner stated that some sites can have alternative land uses and that it may not be solely based upon density depending upon the use and that the number of rooms is not related to the land use category. He explained that with a Conditional Use Permit, which is discretionary, the Planning Commission evaluates the project to see if it fits into the existing neighborhood. He stated this project would not be permitted under the Low Residential category but that it can be permitted under the Low-Medium Residential category. Chairman McNiel commented that his Mother-in-law had resided in this kind of facility for 3-4 years and that few people came to visit. He pointed out that the people there were always quiet, trouble free, that they caused no problems and that it was actually a benefit to the neighborhood because there were no calls about loud music, graffiti, or extra noise in the street. He confirmed his belief that this is a good use. Mr. Jumper acknowledged the point was well taken but then asked what would happen if the developer left and if the building could become apartments or some other use at a later time or if more units could be added at a later time. He added that he wished the property could stay the way it is or become single family homes. Mr. Bullet advised him that this use could not be modified and that the Conditional Use Permit would be revoked under those circumstances. Hubert Surki, 10223 19th Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that he lives just east of this development and that he never received notification. He reported the traffic on 19th Street is very noisy especially at rush hour and with big rigs traveling 19th Street all day long. He cited noise from the school traffic as well as the park traffic would not be pleasing to the residents of this facility. He asked how far from 19th Street the facility would be as well as how many parking spaces would be available. Mr. Salazar responded by saying that sound mitigation would be in place and that a noise study would be required. He also stated that one parking space for every 4 beds were required totaling 29 required spaces and that 67 spaces are provided, so that even if there were 2 beds per suite, it would exceed the requirement. Mr. Buller mentioned that Mr. Surki would have liked the developer to approach him and ask him his thoughts about the project. He recalled meeting Mr. Surki at the previous Planning Commission meeting and noted that Mr. Surki did receive the notice of the public hearing but was hoping to meet the developer and review the plans. Rich Underwood,, 10203 Ring Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, commented that he liked the look of the project but wanted to know the age requirements for the residents and if there will be CC&Rs. He also commented that one gets used to the noise but that he hopes the traffic will lighten up after the freeway is completed, relieving some of the high use travel on 19th Street. Planning Commission Minutes -'7- June 9, 1999 Mr. Brandaw stated that the lease agreement states 65 years of age as the minimum but due to ADA regulations, they have to make a reasonable accommodation if for example an older person has a spouse under the age of 65. He added that their lease provides three meals per day, transportation, and housekeeping and that the age of the residents is self regulating because with those kinds of services, younger folks would generally not want to live there. Chairman McNiel asked if it is based more upon their ability to function. Mr. Brandaw replied that the health of the resident is determined and taken into account. Mr. Bullet noted that a condition could be placed stipulating seniors 65 years of age and above to help regulate, but that since it is a Conditional Use Permit, we can consider additional conditions at a later time if it should become a problem. Chairman McNiel commented on the activities in the adjacent park and pointed out that another facility of this type is located next to Red Hill Park on Base Line Road, which is a very busy street. He remarked that the seniors in that facility often sit on their balconies and watch the baseball games. He also noted that the noise study had not yet been completed. Commissioner Macias concluded that the residents that live there will adjust to their community just as well as anyone else. He said it is their choice to live them, it is their choice to open or close the windows, watch tv inside, or go outside and listen to the noise. He felt they are not going there to die but are going to go there to enjoy the remainder of their ~ives and they will adjust to their community. Hearing no further comments, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Stewart reported that she and Commissioner Tolstoy sat on Design Review together for this project. She asserted that the applicant was careful to design the project to be compatible with the neighborhood and that more senior housing is an identified need in Rancho Cucamonga. She also noted that typically the residents travel in groups and that they use very few cars and that with the land use change there is actually more open space than with some other use. She remarked that this applicant was even willing to preserve a histodc home and that the Conditional Use Permit allows the Planning Commission leverage and that it can be revoked later if it became necessary. Motion: Moved by Stewart, seconded by Macias to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration of Environmental impacts and to adopt the resolutions recommending that the City Council approve Histodc Landmark Designation 99-02, General Plan Amendment 99-02, Development Distdct Amendment 99-02, and Conditional Use Permit 99-08. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: MACIAS, MANNERINO, MCNIEL, STEWART, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE -carried '..'.i....' ..... ,~,.,..,-. ~0 -"n',-r~,,~,,~L~,-z. - ,~ ruqu~[ to ~uuuuu me corner side yard se[§acK the required "15'"fee! [a=,, .... .~.--.-~ ~,'nm n,rooerty line) to 5 feet to construct an accessory structure to be used as a pool house in the'Very LOw ...... =.-' ~;cfrict [UP to 2 dwelling Planning Commission Minutes -8- June 9, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND 19TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09 A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, Curry Brandaw Architects, has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 99-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 12, and June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on July 7, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 5.1 acres, with a rectangular shape, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street and is presently improved with a single family house and citrus groves. Said property is currently designated as Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); and b. The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are improved with a single family residential project. The property to the west is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a single family residential project. The property to the east is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is improved with a single family home. The property to the south is designated as Open Space and is developed with a park and school; and c. 'This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. GPA 99-02 - CURRY BRANDDAW ARCHITECTS July 7, 1999 Page 2 d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public headng and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area, as evidence of that is the proposed residential care facility proposed in conjunction with this request; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all wdtten and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends.. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves General Plan Amendment No. 99-02 to change the General Plan Land Use Map for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~/) 7 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), FOR APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSAAVENUE AND 19TH STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:1076-111-09. A. Recitals. 1. The applicant, Curry Brandaw Architects, has filed an application for Development District Amendment No. 99-02 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 12, and June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment No. 99-02 to change the Land Use Map from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per Acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located at the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street. 3. On May 12, and June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the associated General Plan Amendment No. 99-02 to change the General Plan Land Use Map from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for property located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Carnelian Avenue. 5. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance, The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on July 7, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 5.1 acres, with a rectangular shape, located on the southeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street and is presently improved with a single family house and citrus groves. Said property is currently designated as Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); and b. 'The properties to the north of the subject site are designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and are improved with a single family residential project. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS July 7, 1999 Page 2 The property to the west is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with a single family residential project. The property to the east is designated Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and is improved with a single family home. The properties to the south are designated as Open Space and are developed with a park and school; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the distdct in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment; and This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-02. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. 'That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. DDA 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS July 7, 1999 Page 3 Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public headng, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Development District Amendment 99-02 to change the Land Use Map for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-08 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A TWO- STORY RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY CONSISTING OF 114 SUITES FOR THE ELDERLY IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ON APPROXIMATELY 5.1 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND laTH STREET AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1076-111-09 A. Recitals. 1. Curry Brandaw Architects has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 99-08, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 9, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. On July 7, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing on July 7, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony,. this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and lath Street which is presently improved with a single family home; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single family homes, the property to the south is improved with a school and a park, the property to the east is developed with a single family home, and the property to the west is developed with a single family residential development; and c. The proposed Residential Care Facility use is allowed in the Low-Medium Residential District subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and d. ']'he project will comply with all applicable provisions of the Development Code, and the General Plan upon approval of General Plan Amendment 99-02 and Development District Amendment 99-02; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS July 7, 1999 Page 2 e. The proposed residential care facility use will provide a needed service to elderly residents of the community; and f. The project is designed to be compatible with surrounding development and provide a high degree of aesthetic appeal; and g. The proposed use is in accordance with the goals of the General Plan to provide a full range of housing opportunities. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code,, and the purposes of the distdct in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. 'The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b~ Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council dudng the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS July 7, 1999 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby recommends approval of the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) Incorporate densely planted shrub hedges along the north, south, and west sides of the site to screen parking areas. 2) The refuse storage enclosure shall be designed and constructed using architectural materials similar to the main building. 3) Locate all roof drains/down spouts inside the building to the degree possible. Any extedor drain fixtures shall be designed and located to complement the building architecture. 4) All air conditioning units shall not be visible from the outside of the building. 5) All other design modifications recommended by the Design Review Committee shall be incorporated into the project. 6) This Conditional Use Permit shall not become effective until the related General Plan Amendment, Development District Amendment and Historic Landmark Designations have been approved by the City Council. 7) The tree removal permit shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner before any tree is removed or relocated. Engineering Division 1) Conceptual Grading Plan shall include existing features within and 100 feet beyond all site boundaries (label to remain or be removed) - natural ground, trees, structures, drainage courses, streets, trails, slopes, etc. The Plan shall include cross sections for all site boundaries to scale, extending from streets to the top or toe of slopes adjacent to the parkway. 2) An in-lieu fee as reimbursement for the previously undergrounded overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of 19th Street shall be paid to the City, prior to issuance of building permits. The fee shall be in conformance with the approved Underground Reimbursement Agreement UR-006. The amount for .APN: 1076-111-09 is $44,306.74 plus 10 percent interest per year from the approval of the Agreement in March of 1990. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS July 7, 1999 Page 4 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) 13) 14) Drive approaches shall be the commercial type, 35 feet wide minimum and shall be in accordance with Standard Drawing 101 Type C. Driveway locations shall be a minimum of 100 feet from an intersection and 200 feet from a signalized intersection. Existing drive approaches shall be removed and replaced with commercial approaches or curb and gutter and walls if the driveways will no longer be used. The new driveway on Hermosa Avenue shall be designed to provide a water barrier. The river rock flood wall return shall be a sufficient distance from the main driveway to prevent street flows from entering the site. Driveways on Hamilton Street shall align with, or be offset 150 feet from, Hermosa Park driveways. Sidewalk on Hamilton Street shall be property-line-adjacent (transition from existing curb-adjacent at first driveway) and it shall cross the drive approach at the zero curb face. Driveway accent paving shall be located outside the public right-of- way. Modify 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue traffic signal as required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Install bus bay at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street and on the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and Hamilton Street. The access ramps on these corners must be reconstructed to current City Standards including the walls. The existing overhead utilities on the project side of 19th Street shall be undergrounded, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. Revise existing Street Improvement Plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, to reflect the required public improvements, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. For on-site sump conditions the private drainage facilities shall be designed to handle Q100 and a secondary overflow shall be provided to handle Q100 if the sump inlet is clogged. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 'NO. CUP 99-08 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS July 7, 1999 Page 5 Environmental Mitigation Measures 1) A final acoustical report addressing traffic noise shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval, prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss methods to reduce the level of interior noise to below 45 CNEL and the building materials and construction techniques provided. The acoustical engineer shall submit written verification of the adequacy of the mitigation measures included in the construction building plans. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Conditional Use Permit 99-08 Curry Brandaw Architects SEC Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements CompleUon Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its __/__/__ agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. A copy of the signed Resolution of Approval or City Planner's letter of approval, and all Standard __/ / Conditions, shall be included in legible form on the grading plans, building and construction plans, and landscape and irrigation plans submitted for plan check. B. Time Limits 1. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or Development/Design Review approval shall expire if __1__1__ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include /__/__ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. SC - 4/19/99 10. 11. Project No. CUP 9<)-08 Comple~ion Date 12. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. / / 13. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. / / Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. / / A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. / / Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. / / All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. / / All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. / / The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or intedor alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. / / As on the submitted Site Plan 'A', six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. SC - 4119/99 14. Project No. CUP 99-08 Completion Date Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. D. Building Design Fo All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. / / Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). / / Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/recreational uses. / / All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. / / Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. Motorcycle parking area shall be parking stalls. Developments with rate of one percent. The area for provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. / / Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. / / Carpool and vanpool designated off-street parking close to the building shall be provided for commercial, office, and industrial facilities at the rate of 10 percent of the total parking area. If covered, the vertical clearance shall be no less than 9 feet. / / Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and / / SC - 4119/99 3 10. 11. Project No, CUP 9g.-08 Completion Date submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 12. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. / / A minimum of 20% of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30% within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. / / Within parking tots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. / / Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. / / All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. / / All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. / / The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for' consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. / / Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. / / All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. / / Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. / / Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. / / G. Signs SC - 4/19/99 Project No. CUP 99..08 Completion Date The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. / / Environmental A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $719.00. pdor to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. / / In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., CUP 98-01). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, Title 24 Accessibility requirements, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. Prior to issuance of building permits for the retirement building, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees,. and School Fees. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. SC - 4/'19t99 / / / / / / Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Project No. CUP 99-05 ComDle~lon Date Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, aftertract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday. K. New Structures / / Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. Roofing material shall be installed as for wind-resistant roof covering at wind velocity not less than 90 mph. / / Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of building permits. / / Grading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved gradi,ng plan. / / A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. / / 3. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. / / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along bus bays, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the bus bay, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. N. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / / / / / / / / SC - 4/19/99 6 Curb & A,C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Classll Other Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail island Bike Trail 19th Street v' v' v' v' (e) Hermosa Avenue v' v' v' v' (e) Hamitton Street v' v~ v' (e) Project No. CUP 99-08 Coml~letlon Date Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) Traffic signage and striping including "No Parking Anytime" signs. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way: 19th Street, O. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Q. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / SC - 4119/99 Project No. CUP 99-08 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. The developer __/__/ shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities Distdct (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 2. Fire flow requirement shall be 2,500 gallons per minute. a. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department __/__ __ personnel prior to water plan approval. b. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall__/__ __ be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed, and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6-inch riser with a 4-inch and a 2-1/2-inch outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of the required fire protection system. / I Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection. 7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: a. Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. b. Other: 1994 UBC. Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if the sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of sprinkler system. / / 9. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: a. Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. / / b. California Code Regulations Title 24. 10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: a. All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. b. Other: Contact Fire Department for access requirements. 11. Fire department access shall be amended to facilitate emergency apparatus. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. 13. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear of obstructions at all times during construction, in accordance with Fire District requirements. 14. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up, so as not to impede fire apparatus. 15. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: a. Standard Directory in main lobby. 16. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 17. Gatedlrestricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 18. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for the proper form letter. 19. $132.00 Fire District fee(s), and a $1 per"plan page" microfilm fee will be due to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District prior to Building and Safety permit issuance. ** A Fire District fee in the amount of $132.00 shall be paid at the time of Water Plan submittal. **Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 20. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACTTHE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 9 SC - 4/I 9199 Project No. Coml~letion Date / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 3. Lighting in extedor areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. T. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed. U. Security Fencing When utilizing security gates, a Knox box sub-master system security device shall be used since fire and law enforcement can access these devices. Windows All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner. W. Building Numbering Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. At the entrances of complex, an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover. The directory shall not contain names of tenants, but only address numbers, street names, and their locations in the complex. North shall be at the top and so indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Division. All developments shall submit a 8 %" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department. Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. Project No. CUP 99-08 Completion Date / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / SC - 4/19/99 10 PETITION We the undersigned property owners living in the general vicinity of the proposed Senior Housing Project at the comer of 19t~ and Hermosa,. wish to inform the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and its Council Members, that we do not want this type of housing in our neighborhood. We also wish to state that we want the zoning, in the aforementioned area, to remain as the 2-4 residential dwelling units per acre, with no special use permits being issued. PRINT .~ .................:-... ( ...................[" . -./...., PETITION We the undersignedproperty owners hving in the general vicinity of the proposed Senior Housing Project at the comer of 19t~ and Hermosa, wish to inform the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and its Council Members, that we do not want this type of housing in our neighborhood. We also wish to state that we want the zoning, in the aforementioned area, to remain as the 2-4 residential dwelling units per acre, with no special use per~ being issued.. PRINT NAME ,.~ PETITION We the undersignedproperty owners living in the general vicinity of the proposed Senior Housing Project at the corner of 19t~ and Hermosa, wish to infbrm the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and its Council Members, that we do not want this type of housing in our neighborhood. We also wish to state that we want the zoning, in the aforementioned area, to remtdn as the 2-4 residential dwelling units per acre, with no special use permits being issued. PRINT NAME PETITION We the undersignedproperty owners living in the general vicinity of the proposed Senior Housing Project at the comer of 19th and Hermosa, wish to inform the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and its Council Members, that we do not want this type of housing in our neighborhood. We also wish to state that we want the zoning, in the aforementioned area, to remain as the 2-4 residential dwelling units per acre, with no special use permits being issued. PRINT NAME " - ........ Pf~G'E ~-t o F' t 0 PETITION We the undersignedproperty owners living in the general vicinity of the proposed Senior Housing Project at the comer of 19th and Hermosa, wish to inform the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and its Council Members, that we do not want this type of housing in our neighborhood. We also wish to state that we want the zoning, in the afore:mentioned area, to remain as the 2-4 residential dwelling units per acre, with no special use permits being issued. / ....... :~ .... ~¢ . PETITION We the undersignedproperty owners living in the general vicinity of the proposed Senior Housing Project at the comer of 19th and Hermosa, wish to inform the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and its Council Members, that we do not want this type of housing in our neighborhood. We also wish to state that we want the zoning, in the aforementioned area, to remain as the 2-4 residential dwelling units per acre, with no special use permits being issued. PRINT NAME . ~40 "~.~'~-~'"'z. '~:~..~ r"m~..A ::, PETITION We the undersigned property owners living in the general vicinity of the proposed Senior Housing Project at the comer of 19th and Hermosa, wish to inform the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and its Council Members, that we do not want this type of housing in our neighborhood. We also wish to state that we want the zoning, in the aforementioned area, to remain as the 2-4 residential dwelling units per acre, with no special use permits being issued, PRINT NAME ,~, .'~- ~.. ~ , ,, ,, .... PETITION We the undersigned property owners living in the general vicinity of the proposed Senior Housing Project at the comer of 19t~ and Hermosa, wish to inform the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and its Council Members, that we do not want this type of housing in our neighborhood. We also wish to state that we want the zoning, in the aforementioned area, to remain as the 2-4 residential dwelling units per acre, with no special use permits being issued. PRINT NAME ' , PETITION We the undersigned property owners living in the general vicinity of the proposed Senior Housing Project at the comer of 19th and Hermosa, wish to inform the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and its Council Members, that we do not want this type of housing in our neighborhood. We also wish to state that we want the zoning, in the aforementioned area, to remain as the 2-4 residential dwelling units per acre, with no special use permits being issued. PRINT NAME .J ~ ~ : ~ · , ~ ~' )~.~ ~.~ ?~:,,.:., :. ,~ C..~, ~ (.,) ~' "e ~'~ ~:U~/' L:~/e~',,,",.,,, P,':tGE c~, c,,,F:" I0 PETITION We the undersignedproperty owners living in the general vicinity of the proposed Senior Housing Project at the corner of 19t~ and Hermosa, wish to inform the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and its Council Members, that we do not want this type of housing in our neighborhood. We also wish to state that we want the zoning, in the aforementioned area, to remain as the 2-4 residential dwelling units per acre, with no special use permits being issued. PRINT NAME STREET ADDRESS SIGN CITY ()F RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: July 7, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSlON'S DECISION REGARDING A WALL SIGN - FUNCOLAND - A request to display a multicolor wall sign within Terra Vista Town Center, located at 10730 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 140- APN: 1077-421-75. RECOMMENDATION: The applicant, Funcoland, has requested a 2 week continuance as per the attached letter dated June 29, 1999, and that the signage appeal be heard by the City Council at their meeting on July 21, 1999. Staff recommends the Council accept their request for a continuance to that date. Respectfu~.~ubmitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF\Is Attachments: Exhibit"A" Letter from Funcoland dated June 29, 1999. RECEIVED: 10:30; J]JN-29-1999 13: ~ unco Bring Home The Fun' => R CUCAMONGA COM DEV; P.0! Via f~csin~le (909) 477-2847 June 29, 1999 Mr. Brad Buller Ci~ of RaneJ~ Cueamonga Rarmho Cucemm~a, CA RE: Signage Co~t_tinuance FuneoLand' #32S - Rancho Cueamonga, CA Dear 8red: As per our telephone conversation, we would like to request a two (2) week continuance for the signage appeal for ~e above-referenced location. It is my underat;.,,ding we would be re~cheduled for the July 21st. We appreciate your wiltin9ness to grant ~ extension. Sincerely, Fun©o, Inc. Jan ~, Lewis Homes Steve Berrym~n, US Signs Funco, Inc. - 10120 W, 76th Street · b~lell lhatirie~ M.IN 553~ · Ph, (612) ~8883 · F~ (612] 9~7250 Websira: w~.~lan~ DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 7, 1999 Members of the City Council William J. Alexander, Mayor and SANBAG Member for the City of Rancho Cucamonga CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE DUES INCREASE FOR SANBAG MEMBERSHIP Recommendation The City Council approve the San Bernardino Associated Governments' (SANBAG's) 30% membership dues increase per year for the next three years to be paid out of Account Number 01-4285-3956. Background SANBAG was formed in 1973 as a subregional Council of Governments under a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA). The JPA's purpose is to serve as the County's coordination of regional transportation projects and its membership includes the twenty-four cities within the County and the County of San Bernardino (Board of Supervisors). The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been a member of SANBAG since its incorporation in 1977. SANBAG's major funding sources are from the County-wide Local Transportation Fund (one-quarter of 1% of the State-wide sales tax), Measure ! monies (1/2 cent sales tax that is just for the County of San Bernardino) and general fund assessments paid by each participating City. The general fund assessments are based on a percentage of population and net assessed value for each respective City. SANBAG utilizes the County of San Bemardino's Auditor/Controller Department information for the assessed values. Analysis SANBAG has not increased its membership dues for the past 15 years. This year they have proposed a 30% increase for the next three years. The SANBAG Board is also revising its dues formula to provide for annual dues adjustments based on factors of population change and assessed value change. SANBAG, beginning with Members of the City Council SANBAG Dues Increase July 7, 1999 Page Two Fiscal Year 1999-2000 membership increases, will set aside these monies and keep them in a reserve "opportunity fund" to be spent only by specific action of the SANBAG Board. Attached for the City Council's review is Norm King's, Executive Director for SANBAG, Staff Report presented to the SANBAG Board for their approval April 14, 1999. The City's dues for Fiscal year 1998-99 were $2461.00. This amount will be increased 30%, or $738.00, for the next three years. For Fiscal year 1999-2000 the dues are estimated to be $3,199.00. SANBAG is estimating these increases at this point until they are in receipt of the County of San Bernardino's 1999-2000 assessed value information. Upon receipt of that information, SANBAG will forward an exact billing to each respective City. SANBAG's process for reaching consensus on this adjustment was to meet with the City/County Manager's Technical Advisory Committee and SANBAG's Administrative Committee. Both o:f these Committee's concurred with the recommended adjustment of 30% over three years. The SANBAG Board approved this increase with the approval of its budget at its June 2, 1999 meeting. The City of Rancho Cucamonga receives approximately $1 million annually from SANBAG for transportation projects and considers this adjustment justified. It is recommended this adjustment be approved. Respectfully Submitte/~,~ William J.?~exander Mayor and SANBAG Delegate for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Attachment JUN- 18-1999 i, 6: 4f3 FROM SANBAG ~itll T0 94?7'2846 P. 02x10 San Bernar&'no Caun.rv Transportation Commission San Bernardino County Transportation Authority San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies Minute Actton AGENDA ITEM ! 1 Date: Subject: ~ Recommendation': Background: April 14, 1999 SANBAG Dues Increase 1. Approve SANBAG Dues increase of 30% per year over the next thr~ years. Approve the amount of the inereme be kept in a reserve "opportunity fund" to be spent only by specific action of the Board, Approve that once the dues increase is phased in, that the dues formula be revised to provide for annual du~s adjusunents based on factors of population change and assessed value change. As pointed out in the budget message for the past two years, SANBAG dues have not been increased for 15 years. Though SAN BAG is a Council of Governments (COG) in name, the agency is clearly driven by mmsportafion issues. That is unlikely to change and should not change. However, unlike other Council of Government agencies, the SANBAG dues structure seriously limits the opportunities of the agency to deal with non-transportation issues of a county and region wide impact. Attaehmu-~nt 1, taken from this year's budget message, shows other Southern California COG assessments. This shows lhat SANBAG dues would r'an~e anywhere from $350,000 to over $1.3 million if we used the same assessment formula as used by San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) or Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG). Committee members rcqurst~l thg task name be changed. Appro~d San Bernardino A~oviatzd Gvn~rnmtnt~ Administrative Committree Dote: Apt'fi 14. 1999 _._ Moved: Mikeb Second: ~a*is Favor: 10 Opposed: 0 Abstained: 0 JUN-18-1999 16:41 FROM SANBAG TO 947728~6 P.05/10 Administrative Committee Item April 14, 1999 Page 2 In 1976, total dues were $38,200 (Refer to Attachment 2). //these dues had been increased based upon increases in population growga (226% increase since then) and inflation (265% increase since then) the dues in 1998/99 would be $228,000 instead of $28,654. The history of the dues assessment is that they were reduced to $19,000 (50% decrease) in 1978/79 and then increased to $28,65~, (50% increase) in 1984. Refer to Attachment 3 for the present dues allocation to member agencies of SANBAG. As you will note, the county contribution is $5,665. The city. contributions range from Needles' $87 to Ontario's $3,865. The present $2g,654 of' General Assessment Dues is allocated to the Intergovernmental Relations task and represents about 1/10 oft he total funding for this activity. We have been able to pay :for much of our COG activities because many of such activities are at least tangentially related to our transportation responsibilities and may be funded from transportation sources of funding. We clearly sometimes stretch the limits. Most importanfiy, we have no quick way to respond to changing needs without going through a laborious, volunteer special assessmen~ process which creates its own problems of free-riders and lack of timeliness. In my opinion, the effectiveness of SANBAG is limi~d, especially compared to COGs in other counties by the ever declining (in real dollars) dues base. There are occasional issues that come up where, if we had funding, SANBAG could play a role. These are not generally parsued or even raised as a possibility because of these limitations. As was the case of the electrical restructuring project, we went through the time consuming process of assessing our members on a voluntary b~is. This process would not have been possible without the donation of the startup costs by the County of San Bernardino, and clearly we cannot count on that in all cases. I believe that a venture or opportunity' fund should be established so that when issues arise and it is determined by the SANBAG Board that SANBAO has a role that we can quic 'kly devote resources to immediately deal with the issue. I am not requesting that we add either expenditures or staff in the budget should this dues increase be approved.. Rather, it is recommended thai these funds be reserved ADM9904A-NKK, WPD JUN-i~-igS9 16:4£ FROM SANBAG TO 94??2846 P.04/i0 Adminis~afive CommiReeItem Apfil14,1999 Page 3 for allocation by specific Board action to r~spond to non-transportationissues as, and if, they arise. It is contemplated that in these situations that such f~nds would be best used by hiring pan-time consulting assistance or allocating funds to fund a portion of a staff person's time (thus potentially saving transportationdollars). Next, I would recommend specifically the following: 1. Approve SANBAG Dues increase of 30% per year over the next three years. Approve the amount of the increase be kept in a reserve "opportunity fund" to be spent only by specific action of the Board. Approve that once the dues increase is phased in over 3 years, that the dues formula be revised to provide for annual dues adjustments based on factors of population change and assessed value change. The purpose of this recommendation is threefold: 1) to recognize that our present dues structure is very low (almost non-existent), has no escalation ability and needs tO be revised to reflect past and future growth of the county and cities; 2) to provide flexibility so that SANBAG can respond quickly and aggressively when issues arise for which SANBAG is determined to be the most logical entity to provide a coordinating or facilitating role; and 3) to provide a mechanism to be triggered after the dues increase in phases to adjust dues annually based on the growth of the cities and county based on factors of population increase (50%)and assessed value (50%). At the January Adminiswative Committee meeting there was some discussion that Board members should take this issue back to their individual city councils or boards and that the proposal should be reviewed by the City Managers Technical Advisory Committee. The City Managers did review this item in February and concurred with the recommendation of the proposed dues increase transition. In regard to the other issue, it is always the prerogative of the individual Board member to request a sense of one's own council or board on a particular issue. The Administrative Committee could formally recommend to the Board that each member solicit their city council or board input, or could recommend to the Board not to take action on this proposal until the June meeting and that would provide time for Board members to seek their council input if they so desire. ADM9904^-~RK.WPD JUN-iS-i99~ i6:412 FROH SANBA6 TO g4772~48 P.OS/10 AdmL,'fistrativc Commi~eeltcm April 14,1999 Page 4 Financial Impact: Reviewed By: Responsible Staff.' The first year of the increase totals $8,597 and is included in the proposed 1999/2000 SANBAG Budget. This item will be reviewed by the Administrative Committee on April 7, 1999, and unanimously endorsed by the CiD./County Managers Technical Advisory Committee on February 18, 1999. Norman R. King, Executive Director SANDAG WRCOG CVAG SANBAG SAN BAG GENERAL ASSESSMENT DUES COMPARISON Number of I~opuint~n Totnl Dues !~nes rer Cities/Co.eries Assessnne~t Capita 19 2,690,000 $$93,~0 22. 15 !,032,000 $170,000 16.541f, 9 265,660. $219,000 82.41~' 25 1,618,159 $28,654 ' ! .80~ ~lnivnlent SANBAG Dae~ (1~ Oral Agency Form.h) $222,000 $1,333,000 $'28,654 JUN-18-1999 16:43 FROM SANBAG TO 94??2846 P.07/10 SANBAG DUES ASSESSMENT HISTORY 19'/6 S38,200 !979 $19,000 1984 S28,654 1999 ~25,254 ~ Cl'm~¢ for 1976 to 1999: Due, would be ~.28.000 if du~s had i,lmmmi equal to population gruwth and inflation sine. 1976. 7 JLIN-18-19gg 16:45 FROM SANBAG TO 94??2846 P.08/10 SANBAG General Assessment Dues Estimated Calculation for Irtscai Year 1999/00 Budget 98/99 Net Avg. % % of Assessed % of POP, Total Value Total & Jurisdiction POP. POP. Before RDA Value Value A~el~nio '~.4,240 0.875% ~/69,590,$46 1059% Apple Valk, y .58,676 3.618% $2,023,537,708 2.78t,% Bar~w Z2,716 1.401% $"/33,535,$47 1,009% Big 15cax Lak~ 6,075 0.375% 51,278,119,004 1.7590,4 Chino 64,536 3.999% '$3,335,:502,064 ¢.590% Chiao I-Iil18 54,667 3.371% $3,639,460,157 $.008% Colton ¢5,947 2.833% $1,359,192,520 1.870% Fontann 107,590 6.634% $4,,200,101,.135 5.7'/9% Grand Terrace 13,54`/ 0.835% $437,61~,043 0.602% l.leqnria 60,874 3.753% 51,985,1,M..572 2.732% Highland 41,935 2.586% $1,279,519,650 1.761% Loma Linda 21.604 1.332% $733,002,067 1.009% Montoiair 30,600 1.887% $1,303,5~6,737 1.794% Needl~ 6,004 0.370% $172,068,053 0.237% Ontario 145,743 8.986% $$,549,160,398 11.76`*% Ratmh~ 118,432 7.302% $'/,176,385,495 9.875% Cucatnonga Radl~ 67,284 4.149% ~.,903,615,63g 3.995% Rialt~ 81;58~ 5.030%0 $'2,642,550,604 3.636% ~ Bcxaard~rtn 155,942 11.465% $~,422,19`*,$42 7.461% Twcr~rynina ~¢,8`.8 0.915% 539~,451,122 0.544% Palms Uplan~t 67,875 4.1~% ~,288,~10,710 ,~.525% Victorville 61,650 3.801% ~2,504,6~2,15 ! 3.a,46% Yuc~dpa 53,139 3.276% $1,340,0'~$,065 1.844% Yucca Valley 2~,293 1.559% $689,50'/,171 0.949% Couary 251,0q3 I5.480% 514,510,853,184 I9.967% TOTALS 1~621,874 100o,~ $72,672~1,886 100% :1999 2000 GA GA Dues Dum Amount Amount VAIL 0.968% S275 $361 $83 3.201% $9~7 $1.~92 5275 t.205% $345 $449 $10¢ 1.06'/o/0 $306 $397 $91 4.284% $1,228 $1,596 $368 4.159% $1,200 $I,561 $361 2.352% $67,* $876 $202 6.207% $I,778 $2,312 $534 0.7~9% $206 $268 $62 3.242% $929 $1,208 $279 2.173% $623 5809 S186 l. 170% $335 S436 $101 1.a40% $:52'/ $685 $I58 0.303% $87 $113 $26 10.375% $2,973 53,865 $89~ 8.589% 52,461 $3.199 $738 4.072% $ l, 167 $ !,517 $350 4.333% $1,24,2 $1,61`* $372 9.463% $2,711 53,525 551.~ 0.730% $209 f1272 $63 4.355% 51,248 $1,622 3.624% 51,038 $1,350 $3 2.560% $73`* $95¢ $220 1.254% S359 $467 $108 17.724% S5,079 56,602 $1,523 10004 $28,654 $37,250 $8,,596 NOTES: 1) Populatmn Source: State Controller '~rotor Vehicle License Fees-In Lieu Tax Motor Vehicles Off. Higtmay Monthly Apportionment, January 1999." 2) Net Assessed Value Source: Property Ta~: Sectiort, Cmmty Auditor/Controller. JUN-18-1999 16:44 FROM SANBAG TO 94??2846 TASK: 0049000 COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ~ I~TIATIVES P.09x10 OBJ~~: To ser~e as a depository for SANBAG membership dues which have been reserved for new initiatives related to Councfi of Governments activities. ACCOMPI2S~TS: This is the first year in which this task h~s been budgeted; consequent]y, there are no accomplishments to report. DESCRI]rI3ON: SANBAG has collected general membership dues since its inception. The dues are assessed accordinlg to a formula based S0% on population and S0% on messed valuation of each member jurisdiction. The general membership assessment Js collected to fund the activities of SANBAG when acting in its role as CounciJ of Governmenu. The 1999/2000 proposed budget includes an increase in the Council of Governments membership dues from S28,6S4 to $37,2~. This dm aasmentation is part of a recommended strategy to increase the SANBAG general anessment by 30% annually in 1999/2000, 2000/2001, and 2001/2002. The SANBAG dues have remained unchanged since 1984, and in fact, are S9,S46 less than, the original dues assessment of S38,200 esmblbbed in 1976 when SANBAG was foFmed. If SANBAG dues had inetused based on inflation and population since 1976, the present dues would be well over $200,000. This task is cFeated to hold the additional increment of dues assessment ($8,597) for new Council 'of Governments initiatives which may arise during this or'fllture years. The basic · S28,6Sd of gelMFM ##r~L~mt dues hlLS beeis btld~ted in Task No. 0010400, Intergovernmental Relations, as has been the p~ctice in past years. WORK E!,F. MENT$: 1. Reserve local funds from genera] prrffm~m dues until such time as expenditures of the funds are approved for activ/ties rdated to SANBAG's Councfi of Governments role. FUNDING: S 8.597 l,nc-! F-ha, FY 1999,o000 Additinpal lncrmnent of M,~mhersb~ TOTAl, NEW I:IU!~F.T MANAGER: Deborah Robinson Barmack ..... SANBAG BUDGET APPENDIX 1999-2000 165 3UN-18-1999 16:45 FROM SANBAG 94??2846 TASK NO. 0049000 Council of Governments New Initiatives MANAC ER: Deborah Robinson Barmack P.10/10 BUDGET COM~AmSO~ 1999/2000 Proposed Budget Allocation of Encumbranees Liae Item Conuit~tiom to Or. rs Tots~ Ne~ Tot~ Am~'P~,,~ 1997/98 Actual 1~ Budge. 1.999/2000 Proposed As of'2;03/98 .. SO 0 0 o o so SO 166 SANBAG BUDGET APPENDIX lgg9..2000 TOTAL 'P, 10 CITY OF RAN(;HO CIJCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: July '7, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack iLam, AICP, City Manager Willi~ J. Alexander,~ Diane William~,~) ~' ~'0,A Parks and Rec~kation Facilities Sub-Committee RECOMMENDATION FROM PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES SUB- COMMITTEE TO MODIFY POLICY REGARDING FIELD LIGHTING FEES RECOMMENDATION: The Park and Recreation Sub-Committee is recommending that the City Council approve the waiver of lighting fees for uses after September 1, 1999 for those non-profit youth sports groups which meet the following criteria: Organizations must accept everyone that registers. Groups cannot disallow participation based upon playing ability or ability to pay. Organizations must maintain an overall Rancho Cucamonga residency rate at a minimum of 90%. The Sub-Committee further recommends that the annual fee waiver for each qualified group be limited to the number of light use hours utilized during the previous fiscal year plus a maximum 10 percent increase, if necessary. Any hours used above this baseline amount shall be paid for by the groups. In the event that a qualified group experiences an explosive participation growth in a given year, the Community Services Director will determine whether to adjust the 10 percent increase factor for that twelve month period. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Park and Recreation Facilities Sub-Committee was requested to review the existing policy which requires youth sports groups to reimburse the City for field light costs. The Sub-Committee met on June 8, 1999 to develop a recommendation for City Council consideration and approval. The Park and Recreation Facilities Sub-Committee is recommending that the sports fields lighting fees that are charged to the non-profit youth sports groups be waived for those organizations that meet the identified criteria. The Park and Recreation Facilities Sub-Committee did state that they hoped this waiver of lighting fees would enable the youth sports groups to decrease their registration fees. J MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FIELD LIGHTING FEE POLICY JULY 7, 1999 PAGE 2 During the Sub-Committee's discussion, members expressed concern that waiver of light fees might result in a significant increase in lighting use and associated costs to the City. Prior to initiation of the current fee pollicy, the City's lighting usage and related costs were significantly higher than they are now. During the past few years, the field ~1ocation policy has been improved which allows more specific scheduling of athletic fields and less unauthorized use. Additionally, the City has implemented technology which automatically turns off the lights at a pre-determined hour each evening, eliminating the possibility of leaving the lights on later than approved. Both of these items allow the City to effectively schedule and control lighting usage. If the fee waiver is approved, the Sub-Committee is recommending that staff continue to monitor light usage by groups in the future, with the goal of maintaining lighting usage at the previous year's level, plus a maximum 10 percent increase for any participation growth. Those organizations that would be eligible to receive waiver of lighting fees under the above criteria are: ACE Youth Softball American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO) Alta Loma Little League Citrus Little league Deer Canyon Little League Ranch() iLittle League Rancho Cucamonga Pop Warner Football Vineyard Little League The following organizations are ineligible to receive waiver of fees because they do not meet the minimum residency requirements (90%) and/or they only register players by ability through try-outs. ACE T-Ball R.C. Softball Cucamonga Dodgers California Youth Soccer Association (CYSA); includes Arsenal, Aztecs and California Heat Rancho Cucamonga Indians Rancho Cucamonga Pony Rancho Cucamonga Spirits Staff would recommend that the waiver of light fees, if approved, be implemented September 1, 1999, in order to allow for an organized phase-in of the new policy. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FIELD LIGHTING FEE POLICY JULY 7, 1999 PAGE 3 FISCAL IMPACTS: Based upon those organizations which are eligible, the estimated financial impact to the City during fiscal year 1999-:2000 will be $25-26,000 in sports fields lighting fees. Respectfully submitted, William J./rAlexander City Council Parks and Recreation Facilities Sub-Committee Respectfully submitted, Diane Williams City Council Parks and Recreation Facilities Sub-Committee DM/mam citycouncil/lightingtEes2.99