No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/08/22 - Agenda Packet• THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA R`~°HO AUGUST 22 ~'UCAMONGA ~ 2007 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California ,. ~„ ~ , ~' ~,r , I:' ~,:~, "pC~LL TO ORDER~,,;~~ ~ ~ ,~ Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz_ Howdyshell _ Wimberly _ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ >A~ r tits nW~.. . ~ 4 , ,~ ~ II:", ~ ANNOUNCEMENTS „, ~, ~ ~ ~ ~~'~ `~ ~ III: ~APPROVA~,'OF MI'NL1-'TEST ~ ~ ' ` ~" ' ~°~ ' ' Re ular Meetin Minutes of Jul 25 2007 9 9 Y Regular Meeting Minutes of August 8, 2007 ~ ~ 4 ~_ id i',' fi7P t 'aP"i ~ kn_ ~?~ a a}e.' k~,"R>>N !i ~ i ~ ,a ~ , ~ ' ~,V.u~^~;~;CONSENT, ~CAT~ENDAR , The following Consent Calendar rtems are expected to be routine and non-controversial They wdl be acted on by the Commission atone trine without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion ,, ,~,,,' , ~, , ~~~ , ,,~ „ ~ ~ ~ ;~, ~ ~ ``"'~` ~~" PUBLIC I3E` ,aARI1~T~S` ~~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~,' ~ ~' The following items are public hearings in which concerned ind~vidua/s may voce their opinion of the related project Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be I~m~ted to 5 minutes per ind-v~dual for each project Please sign in after speaking • 1 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 22, 2007 RANCHO cUCAMONGA A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT - A review of anew 2-story Fire District Headquarters building on a 0 93 acre parcel in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at 10600 Civic Center Drive -APN 0208-353-06 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts of consideration B NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMITDRC2007-00544 - WLCARCHITECTS - A request to operate aPrivate/Parochial School use (Kindergarten through Grade 12) and Day Care Facility -Non Accessory at Lifeway Church m the Education Building and related facilities located m the Low Density (2-4 du/ac) Residential District at 7477 Vineyard Avenue APN 0208-921-36 The protect has been determined categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as it qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 C CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS - Review of Master Phasing Plan for the remaining phases of Lifeway Church protect development including an education building, temporary classroom modules, a gymnasium and fellowship hall on 5 03 acres of land m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) at 7477 Vineyard Avenue at Calle del Prado -APN 208-921-36 The protect has been determined categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as it qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439, Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544 VI. PUBLIC COMMENTS This rs the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda • • ., 2of4 • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AUGUST 22, 2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA VII. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Plannrng Commrssron has adopted Admrnrstrabve Regulatrons that set an 11 00 p m ad~ournmenf time If items go beyond that trine, theyshall be heard only with the consent of the Commrssron 1, Lors J Schrader, Plannrng Commrssron Secretary of the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posfed on August 16, 2007, at least 72 hours prior to the meetrng per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 C-vic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate rn this meeting, please contact the Plannrng Department at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meetrng wdl enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listernng dewces are available for the hearing impaired INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks beef If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage ail views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual 3of4 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO AUGUST 22, 2007 CUCAMONGA If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do sounder "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section pnor to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distnbution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in venting The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week pnor to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections dunng regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council w-thin 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,974 for maps and $2,073 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http //www ci rancho-cucamonga ca us • • • 4 of 4 • Vicinity Map Planning Commission r~ r~ LJ A ~ Meeting Location " City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive August 22, 2007 • • s" ~~- `~ t - T H E C I T Y O F 6 ~ '~.L~~c,.~2.w..n w.a ~~~.1i...i~iaw`~§ai''~s.reT~L^LaC &~ii....llw~`.~C~~ Ic.., ~iv .. ~ ~w, n w 12 A N C H 0 C U C A M O N G A Stiff Report DATE August 22, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 -RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT - A review of a new two-story fire district headquarters building on a 0 93 acre parcel in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at 10600 Civic Center Drive - APN 0208-353-06 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Description The project involves the construction of a headquarters (HQ) facility for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District The proposed two-story L-shaped building will be approximately 24,880 square feet in overall size and will house the administrative functions of the Fire District including training rooms, aback-up emergency operations command (EOC) center, an E M S supplies area, a library, etc The building is not designed for direct emergency services/units/trucks Approximately 35 to 50 employees will be housed in the new building The new building will be situated on the northwest corner of the site away from the adjacent intersection, with asecured/gated parking area for 15 spaces at the street corner Access to the site will be from Civic Center Drive to the secured parking area and from Utica Avenue B Site Characteristics The project site is 93 of an acre in size and slopes to the south/southwest To the north and west sides of the site are existing parking lots and development Although the site is currently undeveloped, it has been graded, compacted, and was previously used as the site of the temporary police station/emergency command center in 2003-2004, while the main Police Department building at City Hall was being expanded The property contains utility connections, concrete strip footings, an asphalt driveway, and is covered with mulch and gravel No vegetation exists on the site C Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North -Office Buildings/Industrial Park (Subarea 7) South -Office Buildings/Industrial Park (Subarea 7) East -Office Buildings/Industrial Park (Subarea 7 West -Office Buildings/Industrial Park (Subarea 7) Item A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00592 August 22, 2007 Page 2 D General Plan Designations North - Industrial Park and Civic (for City Hall and County Court Building) South - Industrial Park East - industrial Park West - Industrial Park E Parking Required parking for the protect is 99 spaces based on the size of the building and the intended office use Fifteen secured spaces will be provided at the southeast corner of the site for command staff and vehicles Ten parking spaces for the public and guests will be provided along the north "front" side of the building These visitor spaces are within the adtacent parking lot to the north but are available for City use by means of an agreement by and between the City and the adtacent property owner Other HQ staff members will parkin the existing City owned employee parking lot immediately adtacent to the west side of the site, where 115 out of the 192 existing spaces will be available for City employee use ANALYSIS A General Staff finds the protect to be well-designed and appropriate for the proposed location The subtect site is in an area of the City that is fully developed and surrounded with office professional, civic, and light industrial uses The Industrial Park zoning designation is • consistent with the General Plan and allows for administrative civic service uses, such as the proposed Fire Protection District Headquarters The protect site is nearby other civic and office uses including City Hall, Police Department, and San Bernardino County Court facilities to the west and northwest Employee and guest parking will be available in the adtacent parking lots to the west and north sides of the building When completed, the protect will fill in one of the last vacant sites in the surrounding area, and no adverse impacts are anticipated The protect is well-designed and complementary to the general appearance of the nearby City Hall complex The exterior walls will be clad in horizontal bands of brick veneer and concrete and accented with the use of travertine tiles on the center portion of the second floor and at the public entry Above the entry doors, will be aluminum panels The windows are a combination of square and vertically oriented rectangle-shaped windows made from aluminum storefront material Identification signs are proposed for the north and west elevations Finally, on-site landscaping will be provided around the building and in restricted parking areas The corner of the site (Utica Avenue and Civic Center Drive) will be terraced to create large planter spaces and soften the appearance of the protect at the corner and to provide a location for placement of an identification sign to aid in public recognition of the building B Design Review Committee The protect was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Stewart, and Nicholson) on July 17, 2007 The Committee approved the protect as presented, finding the protect to be well-designed and recommended that the item be forwarded to the Planning Commission for final review and approval A-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00592 August 22, 2007 . Page 3 C Grading and Technical Review Committee The project was reviewed by the Committees on July 17, 2007 The item was conceptually approved D Environmental Assessment An Initial Study was prepared for the entire project and released for public review on July 30, 2007 Based on the findings of the Initial Study, staff determined that the project could have a potentially significant adverse environmental impact unless reduced to a level of less-than-significant by the implementation mitigation measures Areas identified as subject to potential environmental impacts were in Cultural Resources, Hydrology and Water, Noise, Air Quality (short-term during site preparation), and Geology and Soils Proposed mitigation measures have been included as conditions of approval for the project Therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed for the project CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot plus radius of the project site A total of 64 notices were mailed No direct public comment to staff has been received RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approve Development Review DRC2006-00592 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions Respectfully submitted, ~- Ja s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT MPD/ge Attachments Exhibit A - Project Plans Exhibit B -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2006-00592 A-3 I ?~ K ? -_€ vi E ~ ~ w ~~ C U 6 I 5 ~ ~ C k Q 'f J y %{ 7 C J N ^e Q ~~ J ° 2 c D h~ / ~ 1 i~ ~~ 4; # ,, ~~ Y~, , 4 ~ k s , ~~, ~~ ,~ ~"9l ~ +~ ~ YMi Prcr ~ ~ "t ~n ~~I~4~~ ~w~ lu ~ '~ '~ r ~kr ~ '~i'~i .. °t"~ "'p7 ~ s'~ ~ ~ h ~`t &' ~ ~ ~ d+"~ ~a 1~ ' ~ ~ ~ v v k~ ~ { WWWW ~ ~. ~'i O m ~ ~ , ~ ~ r ~ k t ~ ' ~ ~ °^„ ~~~~ulti w d r ~ ~~'4W "" ~ - r `"~1 ,~ x ~ ` t ,~{ ~' F a0 &~ d p ~ M~ G n ~ ` M~ n l { .~/~' a~, ; ~ ~ ' m lll f 4 aiR` V ~v ~p~n~r ~~~ ~ r~ !.ip"MnjYNEm ~ a mfiN i 0 m~! ° n' '~Y~ 6 ~ k ~,a. o ~~ / ~ 1 y~ ~ ~ ~ M` Ak Y ~ ice, ~ . M~" £ 4_ J~~X 1 Cl ? y+.~ ~ ~ ~ V EXHIBIT A C >r ~~~ _J~ ~~J A-4 °- ~~,~~ ~ c 0 ,~, N x~,, N N O O O N U • ~ ~ c E ~ ~ o ~ ° ~~ d N o °~s~ e e ~ ~ ~~ a ~ D;¢~ ~ ~ g uG g~yy '~' Fag ~ ~' ~ ~ ~° 8 a a E $ 9s ~ 5Y u ~; Z ~ ~~ ~ Q ~~ o ~ $ ~ F ~ g isp ~ Z Z~ b J z~ ~ g~ J ~ ~~ 8 a ~d m ~ Z O n ~ ~ Y ~ $ ~ ~ F m~- H (p ~N m f ~ ~ ~ a° i ~ w y ~ i ~F ~ &~~ ~ ~_~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ \ ~~ ` ~, \ ~~ -~ `\ `~ , ~ ~ O~ ~ ,~ ~~~ ~ '~ ~~, r- ~ __ '~ -~ L ~ -~j ~ _ ~ - -- -- ~\ \ I '~ 8i p ~j • _ _ - snr run _~ ~~ ~ 5 X ~ / RS f--r ~ ~_-_-_ - - - - - - - - - ~ IrI ~ - ~ -- ~ 1 2p ' ' ~ U j r s L ~ ~~ ~- I ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ I s `- ~~ ~j --- ~;- ~- ~ ~ ~ ~, v .~ ~, ~ i ~~ d _~, ~~pp ~~~, ~~~ ~ ~ ~ a~ o ~_ ~~_ ~_~ !J~ ~ ~ ~_ ~ 111 ~ ~_~ ; !,;; , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~~ ~ , ~, ', ' ' ~~ ''~ ~ ~ RS ~ ._ ~ ~ ~ _, ,\ L_ , ~ )~ \ V • ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ i I ~ ~ LJ_. ~ U _ ~, _ ~I l_ -~ A-5 - °'~ ~ L f Ft _1k Gj ~ G W ~ 7 ~ 5 E='3i'_ E_f ',? _ _ ~ a - ~ - lye ~ ~ s~ t r 1 ~ ~ iS~ Q ~6 _ t z Y C I lc tt z k ~ t j f _ 6 I L i ` ~ F ~~ Y r J $ 4 t ` z c [ t 'G m _ [ t y 4 * t G t ~~ ~ ~'~ s- Z: _ F` f f 1 d~c Y ~ z Y 4 c ' i c at t.~F tG~ ci.i` ~ S _ B n' t ~ _ r _ _ ~ ~ oa _ - a L s~.~ y U .a C ...r b • G. =~ U C O V L i (~ U L l/1 ~ U n W +~ ~ O a---~ `' U `~ ._ L ~o +~ Cn o ~ u ~ U Q U ~ • ~ r U~ o t~ 1. U p ~ _T ~ U A-6 ,~~~ G non r~ ,. r'l G, ~ . ~ _ • ~: O U O w ~ a z ~ z y r U Z ~j W Z (7 W Z Z ~ W W w Z w F W LL W ~ Z J W C7 z ~ r~ Er~ Z m U ~ O ~ ~ O U w pw O w Ow O~ mz r a p~ qa ~w wag r0 O p ~~ ~ O r g O a z z-> O ~ K U Y J W O W O O ~~ =O a Q W U~~ U ~ r O z a ¢ O ~ r~ N O w Y U~ U~ m z O W~~ d u7i w~~ ~ o Z~ z o~ o~ ~ w z~ a m Z~ q ~~ _ -J J J lL ~ f!/ a O V~ Y fn w a' = U Y a a J~~ a Y O Z_ LL ~ j j~~~ O Q ~ t¢- O w O x~~~ ~ Q¢ O O O Q~~ O z as ~nLLw~n-,ww~~3 W YOm W O~ZUUttI>rU Q O W N t7 O N (O 1~ W rn O ~ N c+1 V N t0 N M V N t0 I~ O O ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~' ~- N N N N N N N C~ 4 R a 0 V Z F- 3! = 7~ r l u .e Q ~~ ~ ~'. v, a F~- ~ ~ ~ ~. N O N U 0 0 a~ a~ c U ~ ~ ^L~ ~_ W L ~ '~-' o ~ bA L ~ _U O ~'~"' U a--~ ~ ~ U o U .~ ~ o ~ U U .. ~ C Q U ~ o ~ ~ v o ~ ~ ~_ LL ~ U I- ~ A-7 Q Z w w J Z Q J J W d ~ N Z Z g O a ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ O Y T o ~ ~ mmo ~o°~JW~ OJ ~O Zw~~OVO O~mWw~~ZO~~J~ au.ULLav,Wrn Y ~ Z> W _ ~ Za,a_ a~_~ O Q w O ~ a 0~~ Ow0000~3LL03v~rn ~ N th V N lD h m O~ ~ ~_ N_ M ~ 7 7 7 7~ 7 7~~~~~ ~~ k a 9 R O Z~ ~~-; w C = ~~ U ga Q ~@ i4 N ~i f~ b_t N O O 0 N U 0 0 v v J 4J Q Q • • a--~ U r^ V I ~--~ L ~ _N n , W i c ~ O U O ~ ~ Q~ ~ O T J _ u- d _ __ c~ c +-~ ~ ~ U o U .L ~ o a--~ ~ ~ (n U U .- ~ ~ Q U ~ ~ ~ o v O L ~ ~ LL ~ U I- -I A-8 J z • 3 e = i §~ d > r §: a = N ~ V S w ~4 ~ :~ = 3i ~ ~~ Q ~k R re N ~a 4 F- i E d 0 N O O O O N U • • O z U C~ L ~ ~ ^ ` W L ~ O u~i ~ ('~ ~ f ~ bA ~ ~ L T ~ i (~ U +-~ U ~ o ~ U .L ~ o ~ .- U ~ U C 0 U ~ ~ o ~ L U ~ ~ !_!_ ~ U ~ J A-9 ~ ii i I I II ~ ~ .I ~ ~I 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I II ~ ~I wl °~ ~~ Z ~~ U ~ w~ ~ ~~ z ~~ ~ '~ R ¢'e N ~. N a, o ~ ~~ a 0 N d~ O O O O N U • 0 Q w v L ~_ 4~ D L c ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- c O ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ U o U '~ ~ o ~ U U .. ~ C ~ ~ O u O L ~ ~ LL ~ U ~ J A10 I II I ~ I II I I I I I ~ 18 ~~ ~ II I i I II I I I I I ~ ~~ S ' ~~ • £~ ~~ ~~ ~ a~ ~~ ~~ Z ~ € ~ ;z ~ ~ i~ ~ w i~ ~~ E~ U __ o Q ~k l/') a _ Q Ca ~ F- a d 0 N O O O O N U • • '~'~~~ x;13 •}i'I~,' ~~ ,3 ~ j i III~~~ ,;,Iy~P~~i ~ y , ~~<<~ a~~~~' x I ~ ~~~ I ,t , I i~i~ '~ I wl~ f I '3 i I`~J ` I I (~~AI~ ~~ St ~j ~ I I II I I II I I II I I II 1~ ~3 I ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~: '~ a w; ~~ ~= ;Ia~~! ~~ ;~ ~~ ~ff 0 U ~ ~ L ~_ i ~ ~ O U o ~ ' ~ I //mo~ I..L , ~ ~ O _ ~"~"' U -1--~ ~ ~ U o U 'L ~ o ~ ( /~ U U .. ~ C Q U ~ ~ U o s o ~ LL ~ U A11 ~' p 4r r P ~ a $ ~ Cj ~ ~a ''AAC = ~ F~ ~ ~ ~a ~„ a a ~. 0 N O O O N U • U ~ ~ L ~ 0 C ~ O ~ ~ *~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ ~- ~ O Z ~- ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ V o U 'L ~ o U ~ U .~ ~ ~ Q (~ c~ O s ~, O ~ ~ ~' + LL ~ U ~_ A12 ~I ~ ~ ~I ~ 1° ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~b ~ e ~~ ~ y t I y7 Cf? X ~ I ~~ ~ ~) 3~~ ~ f~ ~ -•- i f I ~" ~ ~ _ "I~ p~ CC ~ ~ ~ i iv t ~ r r - - f ~ ~~ "j~~~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ I. ~ ~r ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1q~7 ~~ ~ ~gi ~ ;6 ~. a~ ~ ~ ~ , .----~• ~ ,1 ~ n ., . ~ ' L r f ~ - ~i d ~ r.r , t~' ,.. ! I 1 ! r+ " 3 ~ F ! ~f ~ < < ~~ ' r r c crJ x1 /! 7 qq3 1 ~~ I 1 a' ~j U~ ., ,~ , I `° ~. ~ ,`~, ~ ~ /` • ~ ~ `~, _~ .,\ ~~, +' ~~ ~ h i ~~ ~ \~ ~ ~` !l `1 i u ti ~Y r r 4^h 1 , 6~~" \., ti 4 y~ , ~ Y ~~ tY Y a i~ T A A r Y ~~ "~ Y{y~ 1 f_ Jr Aif, ~ , '~ I ~ f ' 1 . _ n" r c / . R r ~ ~AM.M rtF ~~ I VVt ~ 1 ~) ' ~tiS. • ~ ~ 1~ I f., or ~.~ ,+° T ~ A 1 far. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~`A~FA~ r~ ~ ,W r~` ~.IrY ';~,"~,,w,f`1~yj~'1" ~'~"1'F, ~ 1 s 1 k.~ f ' f i~ w`•~ y ~ ~"y'.YSI~Y A~~a ~Jry, ~~ " ~~'1 ,~~ x •4G/ P ~~./° Jr ~ y ~f• ~1 ~ys~ 5 y {~ ~ } I o ~ ~, v ~ f 1~~ f~ j A13 ~~ ~ Z ~ ~, R U C = ~~ U e 5 ~ F Z s Q ~ ~ to N ~a ~ U ^ } ~ ~ a~ W (~ Q w S w ~ w J ~ LL ~ LL ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ \ o- i H \ ~ ~ J ~~ ~ ~ \ S ~o~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ; \ . ~ - -~\ ~. - - \ ~ .. <\ _,\ , ~ ,, -- -_ \ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~a~ ~n~ ~ 1 i ~ ~ ~ - - ~ _ ~ ~ U - --._ _~ _. ._. _- i U Q 9 3nv run ~ ~ i ~ !~ i ~ _ _r a fo ~ ~ ~~ I \', \ , ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ I ~ ~ I ~~ ~ ~ ,/ /' ~ \ == ~b~ %/ ~ / ~ i ~, ~ ~ . , ~ ~ , ~ ~~ ,. W~ , .. I ' . ' ~~ . Wx~ ~ t~ I 'I A14 N O O O O N i _~ ~ ~ i c ~ O U O ~ ~ bA ~ _~ O LL- cd ~ U .~J U o U '~ ~ o .~ ~ s (n U U .- ~ C Q U ~ o ~ ~ ~ o L ~ +_~ LL ~ U l/ l1 u • • .~~~ ~F-~w' ~~~~'~° ENVIRONMENTAL ~-~ , 3 INFORMATION FORM ~,, ~ • ~~~~-3~ ~~'~~ (Part I -Initial Study) _ City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or pant clearly using ink Use the tab key to move from one tine to the next Irne ) Planning Division (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form es to enform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the protect pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines, the California Environmental Quality Act, and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided ~n full Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The protect application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studieslreports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The protect application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc , of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Ptease note that it rs the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the hme of submittal, Crty staff wdl not be available to perform work required to provide missing rnformabon Application Number for the project to which this form pertains Project Title Fire District Headquarters Name&Addressofpro~ectowner(s) City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Ac~encv 10500 Civic Center Drive Name & Address of developer or project sponsor Rancho Cucamonga Fire Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Protection District 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • E X H I B I T B I Study Part1 docPage 1 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 A15 Chief Peter Bryan or Pamela Pane, Rancho Cucamonga Contact Person & Address Fire Protection District, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Name & Address of person preparing this form (rf different from above) Robert Rauscher, Pitassi Architects, Inc., 8439 White Oak Avenue, Suite 105, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Telephone Number 9 0 9- 9 8 0 -1 3 61 Information indicated by an asterisk (*) rs not required of non-construction CUP's unless ofherw~se requested by staff *1) Prowde a full scale (8-1/2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) whrch includes fhe project site, and rnd~cate the site boundaries 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative wews of significant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Pro~ectLocatron(describe) Northwest corner of the intersection of Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue. 4) Assessor's Parcet Numbers (attach additional sheet rf necessary) 0 2 0 8 - 3 5 3 - 0 6 *5) Gross Srte Area (ac/sq ft) 1. 3 a c/ 5 6, 5 6 7. 9 s. f. *6) Net Srte Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications) 0 .9 S a c/ 4 0, 61 7 s, f. 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change whrch would affect the project site (attach addrtronat sheet rf necessary) N/A • • • I \PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPa~16~f 10 Rev 3/17/04 8) Include a description of all permits which wilt be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to fully implement the pro~ecf Grading Permit • Building Permit 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, sod stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Attach phofographs of significant features described In addition, cite all sources of information (r e ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, brot~c and archeological surveys, traffic studies) See attached. 70) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Cite all sources ofmformation (books, published reports and oral history) None we are aware of. I \PLANNINGiFINALIFORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 3 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 A17 11) Descnbe any Horse sources and them levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway Horse, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses Minor noise sources are the adjacent streets of Civic Center • Drive and Utica Avenue. They will not effect the project. 12) Descnbe the proposed project rn detail This should provide an adequate description of the site rn terms of ultimate use that wdl result from the proposed project Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary See attached. • 13) Descnbe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of Land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of Land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc ) See attached. 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project ~ No. I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docP®g18 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 15) lndreate the type of short-term and long-term Horse to be generated, including source and amount How will these Horse levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed Short term noise will be limited to that which is normal for • a construction project. No significant long term noise generation is anticipated. '16) lndreate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees This matte r will be investigated by the Landscape Architect and appropriate action will be taken. However, no mayor impact to existing onsite trees is anticipated. 17) lndreate any bodies of water (mcludrng domestic water supplies) into which the site drams N/A 18) lndreate expected amount of water usage (See Attachment A for usage estrmates) For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591 -- a Residential (gal/day) Peak use (gal/Day) b Commercra!/tnd al/da /ac 6, 41 2 Peak use 1 2 8 2 4 (9 Y ) (gal/mrn/ac) ~ 19) lndreate proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank Sewer If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests if discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estrmates) For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day) b Commercra//Industrial (gal/day/ac) 1 9 0 0 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS 20) Number of residential units - - Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size N / A Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units) N / A w I \PLANNINGIFINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 5 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 A19 27) Antrcrpated range of sale paces and/or rents Sale Pace(s) $ to $ Rent (per monfh) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unrf type N/A 23) Indreate anticipated household size by unit type N / A 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing w~thrn the project Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown rn Attachment B a Elementary - - b Junior Hrgh - - c Senior High - - COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and mayor function(s) of commercral, industrial or rnst~tutronal uses Administration Offices for the Fire District. 26) Tota/ floor area of commercral, industrial, or rnstrtut~onal uses by type 2 7 , 1 7 8 s , f . 27) Indreate hours ofoperatron Approximately 7:00 am to 6:00 pm. 28) Number of employees Total Maxrmum Shrtt _ Time of Maxrmum Shift _ I 1PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTER1lnitial Study Part1 docP~20of 10 36-40 40 7:00 am - 6:00 pm Rev 3/17!04 • • 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated~ob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication ofthe rate o1 hire for each classification (attach additional sheet rf necessary) Unknown at this time. See the Fire District for further • information, 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hued that currently reside rn the City Unknown , '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, rndreafe the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283) N/A ALL PROJECTS 32) Have fhe water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine them ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project ~ if so, please indicate them response All utilities are available at the site, All services have adequate capacity. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals~ Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB s, radioactive substances, pest~crdes and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases Also note underground storage of any ofthe above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, ii known No. • I 1PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 7 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 A21 34) Will the proposed protect involve the temporary orlong-term use, storage, ordrscharge ofhazardous and/ortoxrcmatenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above If yes, provide an inventory of all such mafenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location ofsuch uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans • No. 1 hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the fa , st tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that dill a adequate evaluation can be made by fhe Crty of Rancho Cu mo a Date ~ b Tale present the data and rnformafion required for information presented are true and correct 'ion y be required to be submitted before an Architect • I 1PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTER\initiai Study Part1 docPa~e22of 10 Rev 3/17/04 9) Describe the physical setting of the site The site is a vacant lot that has seen previous use Prior to the completion of their permanent facility, the San Bernardino Sheriffs Dept ,serving as the Rancho Cucamonga police department had two mobile trailers on this site which they used for administration facilities As a result, the site is mostly occupied by a graded pad, with graded slopes descending to the east and south to the sidewalks along Civic Center Dr and Utica Ave There is an asphalt driveway on the south side of the lot, coming off of Civic Center Dr and terminating in a concrete apron at the edge of where the temporary buildings used to sit There are several mature street trees along the east and south edges of the site, but otherwise rt is bare earth Along the north edge of the site, 10 point use parking spaces are available to this property from the neighboring parcel to the north There are also concrete curbs and walks and a concrete drainage swale At the northeast corner of the lot, a large transformer, detector check valve, and some additional electrical service equipment remain from the P D 's temporary facility • • A 23 • ~~,,,,-,~ ~„r~~, n~ ~ ,. ~~s~V~, ~ ,,. ,,,.. ~~~ _ . " ~i , _ >: yyl. .« ti y ~ uW. ` !fin 1 i~ w u r~ u a.~ ,r ~ ~4n• , ~ ~i. f L W. « Y.Y ll y'.w~"'n. Y~;r µ '~ ."t h ~u~k%.~w .i ~r i ma -, a `~y_ - ,...u ^"; t. ~~ Y ~~ 4 n~ «~t.f ~ . G-r s ~vw ~~.i,.,t.iY','~'~.. •^''~" ;w ~ 4~~'~~°". i~~,.i ,m ~ti~ Y;~r ~ y i~~„ni~~ r'r'~ l~ a "'rr.. i~x~ ~ 1 +~ f,~ ' n~i' ~~~ wk v~y~.d"~-.~"•_r~~~ ~.,i ~,L"' ~ `_~ ~~~~ fs~~'tl'~~' _ ~ ~~~ ~~ww~~' ~W~ y C7 A 24 • 12) Describe the proposed project in detail The project is a 26,054 s f administration and training facility for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Its program consists of office space for administrative personnel and facilities and equipment for routine training, including teleconferencing that will link the headquarters with the city's individual fire stations The building also includes fitness facilities, a room for exercise equipment, and locker rooms for men and women Additionally, space is provided for centralized storage of supplies needed for Emergency Medical Services and various ongoing public programs The main video/conferencmg room will double as a supplemental Emergency Operations Center The building's exterior materials palette will be a composition of brick veneer, simulated pre-cast concrete, travertine paneling and aluminum storefront windows and curtain walls Vehicular access for District personnel will be via roll-up security door from Civic Center Dr A parking level will provide 49 spaces on site Public parking will be provided along the north edge of the site, utilizing apre-existing reciprocal-use agreement between the city and the neighboring property owner Employees will also be able to use the municipal secured parking lot to the unmediate west of the site Fifteen spaces have been allocated for district use, allowing direct access to the prunary employee entrance at the mid-level lobby on the west side of the building • • A 25 13) Describe the surrounding properties • The project is located in an area designated by the General Plan as "Industrial Park" under the Rancho Cucamonga Industrial Specific Plan As such, the surrounding buildings are offices and light manufacturing facilities of one- and two-story construction mainly concrete tilt-up buildings with a handful of framed stucco- and wood-finished structures The area immediately to the west of the site is a large secured parking lot used by city employees, with a perimeter fence and a landscape buffer between rt and the street The adjacent properties feature extensive landscaping, including planters with low shrubs and trees, many of which are mature Setbacks and landscape buffers along the intersecting streets m this area appear to be per city standards, and are well maintained • • A 26 .~-+ V ~L _~ 0 ~F~+ V .ice 0 L a a~ L ca 0 ca U 0 L V W H a c~ 0 a w U_ H ~_ D W N 07 0 0 tD O O N U O A 27 tr x ~a; "; ~G~a a~'f~-r. v ~~~' " N'" -~ ... r aC- '" - r ~,,. ' _ w~. " '. . ' ~ -v s ~3i> ~~~° u a-r: , f ~~t ~+ $ '~yi, ~~ ~~e ~ ,,,, Imo,"~" .. ... ~ ss+~a ~ ~.. *{s «... :~ w~ .~, ~ 4~ «.~i~:ca• ;t --~i`e~ ~ u' ~- a v{r,~:a,.."~"akil''~1~1~e~.3.L,~a=~~~ ~_ .m,~.~.v+ ,~~a ..i~:t. _ - _ _~__....~_L .~_ __ _" __..._ _ .. ...a:.'~ 34°6'36"N ~ ~ g I 9 ~ S 0 N ' ~ M I M ~ J ti ,t ,~ ~ I ~ 0 N n ~ ~ ~~~t ~ ~ `-'~ ~ ` I 1~1 r~ ~~i, ~~~ 34°6'24"N 34 u'12"N -~ ^~ • ^ C O I ''' • ~•~ ^ 1 + ~ ~ t ^~ ~ \~ i • ~ I ~' ~ • ~4 ~' J ~ ~ :~ ~ ~~~~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ :i N"9£,9°b£ N"bZ,9°b£ 34°6'0"N 34°5'48"N 34°5'36"N O ° -n e, a 6 ~ N ~Z~ m m M ~ io >• ~ ti e m ~ ya" C G ~ O O U U .C a m m 0 d 0 v i+> c+> ti 0 v M ti 0 N M n 0 v M (7 ? C ? _ d _ ~ ~ ~ (h <° n ' in ~ ~ rn in c~ ~ • i ^ ~ 1 ~. . • o ~ l ~^ • , '~ •• • ^ > C ~ 4 i •^ • ' • •• ,n e III ;• • • ^• • • ~ M ~ ,~ ( 1 AN V L•ij • i ^ ^ ^ ~ ep . . •.y' • --;: _ _ _, ~,.~; l~ ~, ~l ~ ~' ~~ __T / vvi Il\ N„8b.S°b£ N"9£,S°b£ • • • --- ------ ---------q-28 --- ~~~ City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1 Protect File ENVIRONMENTAL ESSESMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT -Review of a new 2-story Fire District Headquarters building on a 0 93-acre parcel in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located at 10600 Civic Center Drive - APN 0208-353-06 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts of consideration 2 Description of Protect The protect involves the construction of a headquarters (HO) facility for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District The proposed two-story, L-shaped building will be approximately 24,880 square feet in overall size and house the administrative functions of the Fire District, including training rooms, aback-up emergency operations command (EOC) center, E M S supplies area, a library, etc No direct emergency services/units/trucks will be provided and/or kept on the site Approximately 35 to 50 employees will be housed in the new building Parking required for the size of the building is 99 spaces The new building will be situated on the northwest corner of the site away from the adtacent intersection A secured/gated parking area for 15 spaces will be provided at the street corner Access to the site will be from Civic Center Drive to the secured parking area and from Utica Avenue Ten parking spaces along the north ("front") side of the building will be provided for • visitors and guests The visitor spaces are within the adtacent parking lot to the north but have been made available for City use by means of an agreement by and between the City and the adtacent property Other HO staff members will park in the existing City employee parking lot immediately adtacent to the west side of the site, where 115 out of 192 spaces will be available for employee vehicles The modern design of the new building is intended to complement the general appearance of the nearby City Hall complex located approximately 600 feet to the west Design elements such as exterior walls clad in horizontal bands of brick veneer and concrete, and standing seam roof elements will be used Identification signs are proposed for the north and west elevations 3 Protect Sponsor's Name and Address Peter Bryan, Fire Chief Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Pitassi Architects 8439 White Oak, Suite 105 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 4 General Plan Designation industrial Park Zoning Industrial Park-Sub Area 7 6 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting North - Office Buildings/Industrial Park (Subarea 7) South - Office Buildings/Industrial Park (Subarea 7) West - Office Buildings/Industrial Park (Subarea 7) East - Office Buildings/Industrial Park (Subarea 7) A 29 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga < Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Headquarters> Page 2 The 93-acre protect site is located at the northwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue, and is bordered on the west and north sides by existing parking lots and development The site is currently undeveloped but has been previously graded, compacted, and used most recently as the site of the temporary police station/emergency command center in 2003-2004 while the mam Police Department building at City Hall was being expanded The property contains utility connections, concrete strip footings, an asphalt driveway, and is covered with mulch and gravel No vegetation exists on the site 7 Lead Agency Name and Address City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 8 Contact Person and Phone Number Michael Diaz, Senior Planner (909) 477-2750 Other agencies whose approval is required (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) None GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report CVWD -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides • ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G A 30 • • Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (/) Aesthetics () Agricultural Resources (/) Air Quality () Biological Resources (/) Cultural Resources (/) Geology & Soils () Hazards & Waste Materials (/) Hydrology & Water Quality () Land Use & Planning () Mineral Resources (/) Noise () Population & Housing () Public Services () Recreation (/) Transportation/Traffic () Utilities & Service Systems (/) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared (/) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared () I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTF ~ IMPACT REPORT is required () I find that the aroposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant UnIE ~s Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately an~,yzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRO(` MENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measutes thai;are imp~seclupon the proposed project, nothing further is required Prepared By Reviewed By ~~ ~ ~i Date 7 ~ (f Date 7~~~a~ A31 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hP g Potentially Signficant With Mrtigallon Than Signdicant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS Would the project a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not () () () (/) limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (/) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments a) There are no significant vistas within or adtacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 The nearest view corridor is Haven Avenue, located approximately a quarter mile to the west and which will not be affected by the proposed protect • b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The site is located at the northwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue and is currently vacant and contains no vegetation Existing office and civic uses characterize surrounding development in the area Bordering the site on its north and west sides are existing parking lots The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) The protect will slightly increase exterior illumination levels in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of new ground- and building-mounted light fixtures will be shown on site plans and will be reviewed for consistency with City standards regarding shielding, diffusing, and glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site In addition, there are not sensitive receptors in the protect area Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland () () (/) ( ) of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract • A 32 initial Study for DRC2006-00592 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Potentially Signdicant With MdigaLOn Than Signdicant No Impact Incor orated Impact Impact c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, () () () (/) due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The site is located in a developed area consisting generally of office and civic uses There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The mayor concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The nearest active agricultural use to the subject site is approximately 2 2 miles to the northeast at the Fillips Winery on Base Line Road (east of Day Creek Boulevard) The development of the subject site will not have an impact on agricultural use at that site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3 AIR DUALITY Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable () () () (/) air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially () (/) () ( ) to an existing or projected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any () () () (/) criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number () () () (/) of people Comments a) As noted in the General Pian FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State A 33 standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Less Than SigniLcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signdicam With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incor orated Im act Im act was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a protect-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained ~n good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • • • A 34 • Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signfcant No Impact Incor orated Im act Impact 0 Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Gluality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, m accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions • 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates m Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would ail be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less- than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a protect basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 10) All industrial and commercial facii~ties shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools C~ 12) Ail industrial and commeraal site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules ~n conspicuous areas A 35 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sgnificant With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Pian FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase m emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The protect proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 No sensitive receptors are located within 1/4 mile of the subtect site or generally within the surrounding area Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated e) Typically, the proposed office use will not create obtectionabie odors No adverse impacts are anticipated 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (/) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service • • A 36 • :; • Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 Issues and Supporting Information Sources City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With Than Significant Miugatron Significant No c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected () () () (/) wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting O O O (/) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan Comments a) According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is within the Delhi Solis Area Boundary However, over the years, the site has been used for a variety of temporary uses including overflow parking and most recently (2003-2004) as the temporary home for the Police Department while permanent improvements were being made at City Hall In fact, the site still retains a series of concrete "strip" footings (covering approximately 50 to 60 percent of the site) and utility connections used to accommodate the three modular units housing the Police Department No vegetation exists on the site and the remaining portions of the site are covered in asphalt, mulch, and gravel As such, the site has been permanently altered from its original (natural) condition, Moreover, the area surrounding the site is nearly all developed with urban uses and improvements such as roadways, buildings, parking lots, and ornamental landscaped areas Therefore, the permanent development of the site will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals b) The protect site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the protect will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on-site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The maJority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) No vegetation of any kind exists on the site, including heritage trees, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur A 37 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sgnihcant With Mitigation Than Signrficant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (/) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (/) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving c) The General Pian FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of- infiuence, including the project site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of • • • A 38 • Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources ph g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Sgnrficant No Im act Incor orated Impact Im act the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Pian Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be I~mited to, the following measures • • • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (~ e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development including construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated A 39 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Significant With Mmgatwn Than Signdicant No Im act Incor orated Impact Im act 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated () () (/) ( ) on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 n) Strong seismic ground shakings O O O (/) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () () () (/) liquefaction iv) Landslides () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (/) that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or coliapse~ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B () () () (/) of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of () () () (/) septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments a) No known faults pass through the site, is not within an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor within the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 51 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hiil Fault passes approximately one mile northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4 1/2 miles to the north These faults are both capable of producing MW 6 0 to 7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to MW 7 5 earthquakes, and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to MW 8 2 earthquakes, are both located 10 to 13 miles northeasterly of the City Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant • • b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels A 40 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Than Signficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potentially significant With Mmgation Than Significant No Im act Incor orated Impact Impact 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and RW(~CB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWGICB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions • c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect will not withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil type on- site consists of Delhi-fine Sand (Db) Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil type on-site consists of Delhi-fine Sand (Db) Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 51-3 According to the Soil Survey of San Bernardino County Southwestern Part, California (USDA Soil Conversation Service 1980), Delhi soil is rapidly permeable with slow runoff and used mainly for growing grapes, pasture plants, and some citrus It is also used as a source for sand and road fill As such, this soil is adequate for development of the proposed protect with no anticipated adverse impacts e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed • 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed schooi~ A41 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Signficant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Significant w~tn Mi4gation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act d) Be located on a site which Is Included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would () () () (/) the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) injury or death involving wiidland fires, Including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands~ Comments a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The Clty participates in a countywide Interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals The project will comply with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials No adverse Impacts are expected b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide Interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements The Clty has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site The closet schools are Cucamonga Middle School (Cucamonga School District) and Ruth Musser Middle School (Central School District), both being located approximately 1 mile West and east, respectively, of the subject site As an office use supporting the administrative functions of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, the use will not create objectionable odors that would in any way impact a nearby school Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated • • • A 42 • Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signficant With Mitigation Than Signficant No Im act Incor orated Im act Im act d) The proposed project site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspections indicate a clean site with no evidence of discarded items, drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No adverse impact is anticipated e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The project site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes polices and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 • • 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (/) () ( ) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () (/} (} ( ) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site () () () (/) or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the () () () (/) capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () (/) A 43 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potentially Signrficant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incor orated Im act Impact g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that () () () (/) would impede or redirect flood flows i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (/) infury or death Involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES Permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction Permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the Intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of ail BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction protect proponents are required to prepare a SW PPP To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Pian (WQMP) for post- construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (July 10, 2006), that identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non- structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls • ~: • A 44 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources hh g Potentially significant with Mmgation Than Signdicant No Impact Incor orated Impact Impact focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on- site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Post- Construction Operat~onat 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Gluality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (July, 10, 2006), to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits • b) According to CVW D, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed project will not deplete groundwater A 45 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation, however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9}, continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solias in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has • A 46 initial Study for DRC2006-00592 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Signdicant With Mdigahon Than Sigrnhcant No Im act Incor orated Impact Impact been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Budding Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit g) No housing units are proposed with this project No adverse impacts are expected h) The project site is not located within a Special Flood Hazard Inundated by a 100-year flood according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drams as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected ~) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site, therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the • level of no adverse impact within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or () () () (/) natural community conservation plan Comments a) The site is located at the northwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue in an area that is near full development with office professional, civic, and light industrial uses The zoning designation allows for administrative civic service uses, such as the proposed Fire District Headquarters Surrounding the site are other civic and office uses including City Hall and San Bernardino County Court facilities to the north and west Immediately adfacent to the west side of the site is an existing parking lot that is currently used by City Hall, Police, and Fire Department staff When completed, the project will fill in one of the last vacant sites m the surrounding area and no adverse impacts are anticipated b) The project site zoning land use designation is Industrial Park, Subarea 7, which is consistent with the General Plan's land use designation of Industrial Park The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated A 47 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Less Than SigrnUcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Sigrnficant w~tn Miugahon Than SigniUcant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact c) The protect site is not located within any designated habitat conservation or natural community plan area Therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact 11 NOISE Would the project result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () () () (/) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels () () () (/) in the project vicinity above levels existing without the pro~ect~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (/) () ( ) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the prolect~ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise leveis~ f) For a protect within the vicinity of a pnvate airstrip, would O O O (/) the protect expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Comments a) The project site is not within an area where noise levels exceed City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out No adverse impact expected • • J A 48 • Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sgnificant With Mdigation Than Sigrniicant No Impact Incor orated Impact Im act b) The administrative civic office activities associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday • 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport The site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path Therefore, no impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated A 49 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signrficant w~tn Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incor orated Impact Im act 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the pro/ect a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the () () () (/) construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area The protect is intended to provide a new central building to accommodate the existing employees of the Fire District's administrative staff that currently occupy space in City Hall and other satellite locations within the community The Fire District expects to relocate approximately 35 staff members to the new building when completed As such, the protect will not create a demand for additional housing as a matority of the employees already live within the City and/or surrounding communities No impacts are anticipated b) The protect site contains and affects no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The protect site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the pro/ect result in substantial adverse physical rmpacfs associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physrcally altered governmental facrlrtres, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, rn order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance ob/ectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections () () () (/) b) Police protections () () () (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities () () () (/) Comments a) The protect site is located approximately 1 mile from the Station 174 at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Jersey Boulevard The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated • • A 50 • Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Signifcant w~tn Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled The Police Department is located nearby in the City Hall complex approximately 600 feet to the west No impacts are anticipated c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District However, since the project is being initiated and implemented by and for a public agency, the project is exempt from the requirement to pay School Fees No impacts are anticipated d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park is located approximately 1 mile north of the project site The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities No impacts are anticipated • e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The project will not require the construction of any new public facilities or alteration of any existing public facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new public facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has opened a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build- out of the City 14 RECREATION Would the project a) Increase the use or existing neighborhood and regional () () () (/} parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the project include recreational faalities or require () () () (/) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments a) The site is in a developed area, currently served nearest park is located 1 mile from the project construction of any new housing units nor will be cause an increase in the use of parks or othe anticipated b) See a) response above by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The site This project does not involve the a large employment generator that would r recreational facilities No impacts are A51 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than S~grnficam Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Sgndicant w~tn Mitigation Than Sigrnficant No Im act Incorporated Impact impact 15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project a) Cause an Increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial Increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (/) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments a) Construction of the proposed Fire District Headquarters will generate approximately 234 Average Daily Trips (ADT) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The project is in an area that is fully developed with existing street improvements and/or those (e g ,curb, gutter, and sidewalk, etc) which are typically included in the scope of the project design The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections No impacts are anticipated b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that proposed Flre District Headquarters will generate 54 two-way trips during the P M peak hour The project is in an area that is fully developed with all necessary street improvements The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials No impacts are anticipated c) Located approximately 5 miles north of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The project is in an area that is nearly all developed Street improvements already exist along the street frontage of the site The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated • e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated A 52 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Than SigrnUcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant wain Millgauon Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity The project will provide 15 spaces on-site and rely on the City owned parking lot to the immediate west of the site for the remainder of employees in the building The existing City employee parking lot immediately adjacent to the west side of the site contains 192 spaces, 115 of which will be available for employees to park their vehicles In addition, ten (including 2 disabled spaces) parking spaces will be provided at the front (the north side) of the building for visitor and guests per an existing parking agreement by and between the City and the owner of the north property Therefore, there are no parking impacts associated with the project g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) • 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (/) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to () () () (/) accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste Comments a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the • Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated A 53 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Less Than Signifcant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources Pp g Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incor orated Im act Impact c) All runoff will be properly conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the anticipated flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits The impact is not considered significant d) The project is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this protect No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste from the project will be typical of most office uses with disposal services being provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures in accordance with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated 17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the quality () () () (/) of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of California history or prehistory b) Does the protect have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future pro~ects)~ c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () (/) ( ) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the site has been previously graded and used as has nearly all area surrounding the site Based on previous development and existing street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed protect is approved, then the applicant will be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of • C • A 54 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Ph g Potentially Signrficant With Mmgation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required • c) Development of the site under the applicable land use development standards will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities are completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels during construction activities Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (/) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (/) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (/) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) A 55 Initial Study for DRC2006-00592 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur Signature Pnnt Name and Title ~~ Date `' ~ ~ I 0 • • • A 56 i= • ~-~~~ Clty of Rancho Cucamonga ;Afc_~~ :`~~~ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mrtrgated Negative Declaration rs being circulated for public review rn accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code Project File No DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 • Public Review Period Closes August 22, 2007 Project Name Project Applicant Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Project Location (also see attached map): Located at 10600 Civic Center Drive - APN 0208-353-06 Project Description Review of a new 2-story Fire District Headquarters building on a 0 93-acre parcel in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) r FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the protect plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the protect, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment if adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study The protect file and ail related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477- 2847 NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period Auqust 22, 2007 Date of Determination Adopted By A 57 RESOLUTION NO 07-51 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF A NEW TWO-STORY FIRE DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS BUILDING ON A 93 ACRE PARCEL IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 7), LOCATED AT 10600 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0208-353-06 A Recitals 1 Pitassi Architects Associates, on behalf of Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract, filed an application for Development Review DRC2006-00592, the design review of a two-story 24,880 square foot Fire District Headquarters buiidmg as descrabed m the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 22nd day of August 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on August 22, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to a 93-acre site located on the northwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue, and b The project site is currently zoned Industrial Park Distract, Subarea 7 The properties surrounding the site are also zoned Industrial Park Distract, Subarea 7, and have been developed with similar office and/or industrial park land uses Furthermore, the project is m close proximity to other established civic uses including City Hall, the Police Department, and the County Courthouse complex to the west and north of the site, and c The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detramental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materaally m~uraous to properties or improvements in the vianity, and d The project design meets or exceeds the development standards of the Industrial Park District, and e The design of the Fire Distract Headquarters iswell-done and complementary to the extensor design of the nearby City Hall facility, including the use of high-quality brick veneer, concrete, and standing seam roofs, thereby, providing 360-degree architectural treatment, a goal of the General Pian ~ ~8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07- 51 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 -FIRE DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS August 22, 2007 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the • above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed protect is consistent with the obtectives of the General Plan, and b That the protect site Industrial Park District zoning designation is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Industrial Park, and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local • CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Irntial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (u) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent tudgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect d The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based, is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 ~~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07- 51 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 -FIRE DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS August 22, 2007 Page 3 • 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) This approval is for the site plan, exterior building design, and landscaping for the new Rancho Cucamonga Fire Distract Headquarters building at the subject site 2) The approved two-story 24,880 square foot building, shall house the administrative functions of the Fire District Headquarters 3) No exterior changes to the design of the project, including exterior materials, shall be permitted without prior City review and approval Plans submitted for plan check shall conform to the plans as reviewed by the Design Review Committee on July 17, 2007, and as approved by the Planning Commission on August 22, 2007 4) All guest parking spaces for the facility shall be conspicuously labeled as "Visitor or Guest" parking and made available for visitors only to the facility at all times The Fire Protection District Employees shall parkin the adjacent city-owned parking facility located immediately west of the subject site • 5) The Planning Director shall review and approve the placement of all mayor identification signs for the facility 6) All masonry walls and/or fencing for the project shall be decorative and consistent with the architecture of the proposed building No unfinished walls shall be permitted 7) All wall and ground-mounted exterior light fixtures shall be designed and placed in a manner that avoids glare and adverse impacts to adjacent properties 8) The applicant shall contact and work with the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate process for relocating any public mailboxes located on Utica Avenue The final relocation of any public mailboxes shall be subject to Planning Director and City Engineer review and approval 9) Backflow prevention devices shall be screened from public view by means of either dense landscaping or a masonry wall Such screening shall be compatible with the on-site development and subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director or his designee Engineeranq Department • 1) Civic Center Drive frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including A-6o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07- 51 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 -FIRE DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS August 22, 2007 Page 4 a) Protect existing curb, sidewalk, or repair as required Repair • portion of sidewalk (uplifted by existing tree) to City Standards near the curb return b) Proposed drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Std 101 Type C Said approach to be in accordance with City Driveway Policy c) Protect the existing R26(s) signs or replace as required d) Provide one (1) 9500 Lumens HPSV street light and street trees e) Install four-way stop and appropriate striping at Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue 2) Utica Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local" standards as required and including a) Protect existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, or repair as required b) Protect existing R26(s) signs or replace as required c) Provide one (1) 5800 Lumens HPSV street light and street trees 3) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with tentative • map application has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the plan on Grading Plans when submitted for technical plan check Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management Distract (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) Ali paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied • either by hand orhigh-volume, low-pressure spray f~'(ol • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07- 51 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 -FIRE DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS August 22, 2007 Page 5 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carved over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occur as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i a ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of 10 minutes) /4--6 a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07- 51 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 -FIRE DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS August 22, 2007 Page 6 11) All industeai and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stepping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to morntor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, • the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opporturnty for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take • appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , /'~--63 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07- 51 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 -FIRE DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS August 22, 2007 Page 7 • paleontological morntoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i a ,San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods • 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM~o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum • extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific /4-~4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07- 51 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 -FIRE DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS August 22, 2007 Page 8 measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground • disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (July 10, 2006) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and • minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit • ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07- 51 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 -FIRE DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS August 22, 2007 Page 9 Noise 1) Construction or grading on weekdays shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m ,including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level morntoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase 4) Haul truck deliveries on weekdays shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for • hauling would exceed 100 daily taps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Pian denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and • adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of August 2007, by the following vote-to-wit PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07- 51 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 -FIRE DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS August 22, 2007 Page 10 AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • 14"~~ "~~ ~~"'; L~: City of Rancho Cucamonga ~- MITIGATION MONITORING -~ ~: ~~ ~ ; __~ PROGRAM Project File No DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration fortheabove-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the protect A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 2 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department/ 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 A 68 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 Page 2 2 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 3 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 4 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 5 Unanticipated arcumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel • 6 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also • has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 7 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 8 In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits • A 69 .7 • '"' a J a Z ~:.i F- ~_ J Y W 2 U C~ Z_ O Z CO G Q r H U H W Z N Q o ~ M c ~ U_ Q. ~~.. Q ~ N 0 0 ca 0 0 N U Z U_ ~ ~ a Q ~ W '~ W ~ ~ ca O ~ z a '~ ~ ~ LJ.. ~~, U (/1 Q~ (B ~ ~_' a ~ N N N N N a U a a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n a ~ ~ Q • o 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U m U 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 ~ a. ~ m m ~ - - ~ m O~ c~ C O L C C ,.r m ~ ~ a~ c ~ .-. C ~ >, L _N -O_ O O U O_ 'J -a O ch O ~ ~ ~ ~ '-' c~ ~ +~ U U N O O O C U r a L ~ C~ »~ c~ L N c0 ~ N "" U V N O~ O Q .~`-. N a me d O ~ N ~ ~ N ~ N L C ~ Q y U O ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ O Q ~ ~ O N `O ~ L O U ~ 7 ~n Q~ ~ . Q cn ~ cn U ~ L U ~ ~ C L cT3 C_ U C >' ~ LT ~ (~ i L ~ >' (00 N ~ ~ L CCS ~ C AO C~_O N N N ~ ~ -per ~L+-.~ OU O ~ OQ O ~ U ~ ~ °' c~ ~ ~ c ~ o ~ ~ O ~ ~ o ° ~ ~ >; - O N O1 U L (LS .U7 0 0 i~~ pp ~ >. L U O C ~. CSS C Q >' .~ c~ Q - C p ~~ L~ O N 7= U O ~ c~ ~~ y C 0 O Cn O C O O "O N C O Q U~ ci3 Q O N cn ~ o0 p o c L cn -p ~ C . U 0 _ 0 0~ L ~ 'D N O Q 0 ~ "O U Q ~ ` o Qo ~ U O N c~aC~ pia ~ ~ ° O to °cv °~ ~a ~ 7 a>~ O_ °"~~ ° o ~ ~ -° ~ °U- ~ o- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cv~ ~ C_ ~~ N ~ C ~ H ~ U ~ O (~ .-. 0 0 ~ N N N R$ - C L Q , ~ ~ c~ .~ C ~ CSS O _ ~ CLS C.~ ~ C C ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ,._ a> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E c i6 ~ a~ ~ ~ U .C Q U ° c~ o ~ a' C U C~ ~ O Q m N U N~ CJ N~~ C cti ~~ ~ C ~° ~ C ~ ~ C[S N i O C E C E~ c~ ~~ C c0 E E O ~ Q C N O "~ d ~ ~ ~ N C ~ ~ ~ m O j ~ ~ ~ ~ O C O cSf c~ °' ' ~ ~ C L ~ ~ O U ~ Q ° E~ ° Qo a- i SU E~~ a~ ~ a > a Q a~ ~ Q ° Q~ ~ A 70 0 T . . ~ ~ ~ v N N N N ~ d' d' ~ cr d' d' ' a a s a Q Q Q Q Q Q a C C C C C C CTS CTS f0 (~ Cif c ~ Q a Q a a 0 0 ~ o o °- O N O ~ O N O N O N U CTS U m~ _ U ~ ` U CTS U CTS O ~ > _ > > > > C~ C~ . C N C C C~ C C~ C N O O N N C 7 0 C 7 0 7 0 C 7 0 C 7 O Cll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D U D U D U D U D U ~ • U U U U U U U U U U U . . ~ m m m m m m m m m m ~ m ~ ~ m ~ o o c ~ c -a v m~ ofo - L o-= ~ ~- o~ ~ -a >, c ~ c ~ - -o c o c o~ c c0 TO O N ~ _ O Cn p - c0 .~ }' ~ O CO ~ ~ O c0 U o O CO U -O p E C O C CO to s_ - a te >, ~ .-. _ y V "C C O C ~ .--. O Q i O ~ ~ ` O ~ ~ >, " O L O Cn ~ ~ .~ O c c0 O N p ~ U N ~ ~ O c ~ ~ cn c0 in ~ -~ 00 ~ N r E -O N TO ~ ~ L O ~ CO Q ~ ~ ~ . U O o U ~ Cs O L ~ ~ N .. ~ CO ~ c0 ~ N ~ ~ (n ~ o N Cn ~ ~ O O ~ i ~ ..O Cis CO ~ ~ > ~ N ~ O U Q ~ fll C O Cn O 0 0~~ L ~ C ~ ~ O C -Q ~ >'' ~ ~ ..._. p .Q U .C N N 2r ""' ~ CA a N (O ~ C N ~ CTS O ~ ~ C ~ O L_ -O O a-O ~ C ~ __ C ~ O N N ~ ~ ~ U ~ Cis O O ~ ~ Q N E "- -p ~ ~ m ~ ~ N > - ~ O j fll ~ i Cll >+ C .L_, O C O ~ - N~ O -p CO ~ C O C In L U~ ~ > U~ ~ O i (TS O (~ Q O ~ CO E L O_ N > O ~ C X p - L O p` ~ C -O O N~ C ~ T N Q C~~ ~ ~~ UO ~ O N ~ ~ ~ O O to ~ U U O O ~ ~ N ~ ~ CO U O ~ N ~ > - O ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CJ ~ ~ O O O O O ~ > .~ v '= O Q Cn N Q ~ C ~ ~ t0 00 ~ ~ O O C O (ll j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ O (ll ~ U Q CO N C CO O C N (T ~ >, ~ ~ C CO ~i Q ..fir ~ N fTS > -p O ~ O C '- C L ~ d CO Cn ~ ~ C lC! UO O .C O U N fl- Q- O CO ~ CO U U O O _ O U ~ O~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ N ~ Cis Cn C7f ~ ~ O fis Y O -~ i~ L ~ Cll }. _~ ~ O ~ C Q ~ N CO ~ ~ ~ CO ~ L iT U c0 O O ~ L Cn c O a> O Ca O ~ Q. (v Op 'D (ll c Q N ~ ~ i N C Off" ~ ~ ~ N ?j LL (ll ~ c N ~ ~ ` O N> O O O > CSS CO ~ L O Y L O_i U O Q'~ p> L O p 0... C ~ O H Q Cn~Q 7 C U c- c0 O+_ ~ L CO U CO O ~O C O -O Um ~ ~ U (ll c... O (~ ~ ~ ~ i d. CO X Cn N ~ U C ~ (O fll >, O (n L .L.-~ ~ U Cn ~ (n (is 7 ~ L O ~ ~ N O ~ ~ ~ O U i O- m U N~ O O~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ O f- ~ ~ CTS ~ U ~ CO ~- CiS • ~ • O N • A71 • • N d' N N N N N ~ ' a Q a o o U U a fn C fn C (A C In C (n C N C [n C ~ Q C~ CSS (~ C~ (~ (~ CSS ~ d • Q Q Q O_ Q Q L _ • O _ O _ O _ O _ O O _ O _ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N O O N O O O > > > > > > > > O O N N N N N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • U U U U U U U U • O m m m te ~ ~ m m ~ a . Y U 'O C O N '- -O O L S O ""' 0 O m D L O~ N- C ~- N 0 R C N `= L O ~~ ~ C C O (~ 0 ~ L N C - _C ~ C (~ ~~ 0 ~ N O (6 L ~ ~ ~ O Q ~ ~ L L L_ ? ~ ? ~ QL ~ ~ N O ~ O N 3 ~ ~"O c~ ~ C N C N D O_ - p ~ ~ ~ ~ i _~ U C H ~ ~ ~ O f~ ~ N C C > O C ~ O O U O~ C ~ O ~ C E m O E ~ L O N U O Y ~ j, ~ 7 ~ p rn ~ ~ O O O O O~ ~~ cn ~ in t~ O R U C U "p U U N N N O O y E ~ N L C U -~ L ~ O ~ ~ ~ O N C ~ O O ~ C O O N +- ~ C C i ~ ~ ` ~ ~ „ ,_, C ~ O ~ c0 ~ C6 .T- O U _ rn cII c ~ ~ - ~ " ~ N ' ~ in v; in a ~ o c ~ ~ ~ U o c U a~ ~ ~ ~' c _ U ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-a O o~. O aa,o i -CL ~ ~ ~ _c ~E ~~ ° w~c ~~ ~~a> ~o ~ ~ c i~~ ~ E~ _o ~*'ELL o~v, ~ ~~ ° ~ ~ ~ c °° o ~ ° - ~ ~ ~ a roa i i ~~ mL a m~ ~ ~o `~~ `~ ~ ~ i a . ~ c E ~ ~ c~ c ~ ~ ~ m m o 0~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~" ~ ~ o QT~ ~ co >' o c~ ~- O E~ ~ E E E.a ~ E- ~ ~' ~ o ~ o~ o ~ asp ~ °~ ° ~ ' L ~= ~ ~ N _ ~ ~ O E U~ ~ ~ COJ ~ ~ O> O ctf U L ~ ' O L U cn ~ ~ O 'D ~- p 'a ~ y _ Q ~. O U N ~ c~ O U p~~ ~ ~ Q > C ~ -O '~ O ~ U~ -O C ~ ~ N~ -O to p C co ~ y N O S U ` O O O O N ~Y.~ ~ ~ O_ c~ ~ O U U C O) ~ C~ (~ C C C C N~ C6 N O (i3 j ~ (~ C (~ O U ~ CO ~ Q- ' O !n O L -Q '~ ~ E D E C O ~c~ ~~ ~~ ~o~ , ~o~E ~o" b o- ~ °'-o~o~`~ ~O~o C ~ - i .~-~ ~ L CO ~ O.. ~ i Q ~ ~ o ~ ~--~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ " O - _ ~ ~ _ U OU ~ _ w0>-- p ~ ~~ N p cnE~ C ~Eo~c O C N ~-o O) (n ~-o fn O f6 o° NOO T C (~ N i U~O~ p L ~ ~ „ 6 ~ C O " 6 C N ~ O C O ~ -p C N~~ O N C N N= om O C 7 C +~ N L ~ ~ W ~ C~ y L p ~ E - ~ ~ - N _ - O O - O Q O B - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ C c0 O > C ~ CJ ~ v~ ~UU Q°'Q Qa QED QEo~ Q°'L ¢°'~ U a~°'roQC~ • ~--. O c7 A 72 . . ~ ~ « c ~ ~t v ' a a s a a a n a a a a~ m a~ m a a~ n. a~ • 0 0 0 `0 0 0 ~ ~ m ~ m ~ i a a i i a i a a>i ai ai a>i ai m m m m m m m U U U U m m • O O O m m m 0 • 0 ~ D O ^ d a ~ ~ ~ a ~ N ~ C ~ cl7 ~ ~ ~ C (~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ "- ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ L ° O ~ -O O L ~ L ~ .r ~ ~ .J O ~ ~ '-' O ~ ~ E LL.I O ~ Q C O U E C~ >' ~ c E Q E O "" .C ~ ° ~ '= ~ N UO ~ 'O ~ C O ~ DLO. ~ ~ Q ~ ~ = O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ N in ~ p O ~ O ~ ~ m ~ !Z p co _O ~ O L ~ ~ ~ ct5 O) co L _ ~ - . cts a~ N ~ °" s ~ ~ p N ~_ tp - O ~ (ts p C Q cts ~ c~ C N ~ Q_ p ~ ctS ~ E m C N ? ` ` O ~ O "p C Q ~ ct3 m ~ O Q O > ~ ~ O ~ > ~ ~ U N C O O7 ~ O = ~ p 0 O O ~ ~ U v` O ~O L C C "_' O - O p ? ~ O E~ 7 i O .Q ~ .. m c~ U ..~ f O C ° ~ ~ n o~ Q o ~ c~° m o ~ o-z3 oin c ~~ c~ ro Q`~r ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ c -~cn ~ tic c o ~ °' o '~~ c°~ o roa~o°c~ o o _° ~ ° c° E ` ~a'»-:a~°~-~ ~ o~ o 0 c ~"' c a O ~~ ro arc `-'~ °~ g ~ ~ o ca ~~r ~ o ~ c ~ N O ~ o ~ ~ ~ O ~ ` i cn ~ ~ O C ~ U U p p O ~ ctS ~ ~ "" N L ~ O cd ~ ~ Q) = -' U ~, O ~ ~ ~ O Q ~ ~ ~ O ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a - p ~ ~ Q O O N "' N O O O ~ ~ ~ C L~ O . _ >> C C~ O E ~ . O ~ OU ~ ~ `- m a p =~ c N ~~ ~~ ~ cts ~ -O 7 - O ~ N N~~ A N C ctf p p> co O O - O O O~ ~ Q N `-' N~~ O ctf _° Q c~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q. 't3 U c ~ ro E C > a O d «7 L ~ '- O L O ~ !? ~ O C ~ Q ~ ~ C O O U p N U~ "p ~ O i d cts . ~ CO ~ p~ d U N Q O) L ~ ~ 0 0~ ~ L ~ 'O O c~ O Q c~ U ~ ~ O ~ t~ ,~ p Q O C ~ c o U~ O _ _ cn 0 C ~ Q N E _ o in O- U - cif ~> C p cif O~ O_ O ~ ^ O .~o~'o~.La ado - ~ U o_ (~ In E (~ ^ • ~ • 0 • A 73 • • d- c~ c-~ v ~t v ~ 0 'a o o Q Q Q Q 0 0 0 Q Q Q 0 0 0 0 O O O U LAS U ~i U CAi U m~ _N O N ~ ~ > ~ > QJ > ~ ~ ~ 7 p C ~ p D i ~ 7 p ~ C ~ p D ~ ~ ~ D U U U U U m ~ O U U U U . . m te d m m m m a . N O N E N O O O ~ c~ w ~ ~ ~ 'O U~ ~ °' c~ ° ~ O p ° ~ C B O O ~ ~ ~ c~ > ~ ~~- ~n N ~ u ~ ~ c ~ c~ ~U ~ o -a ° N ~ ~ o ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ o c c a r ~ c c ~ ° ~ ~ O t C S aam ~ o ~ o ~ O ~~ Q O~ ~~ U ~ °~ Q o 0 o S L ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ C N ~ C -~ „~, U L O U ~ ~ N Y RS N ~ O ~ ~ Cn O ~ ~ O U ~ ~ ~ ~ O O C i~ U N E~ ~ Q _ N O O "O CO >. O C ~ ~~ u> Cd O ~ ~ ~~ ~ C ~ O d N ~ L 'O C c~-p ~~ O C~ ~~ - _ v ~ O cn Qa ~ ~ N ~ ~~ U P C ~ ~ to N -rn ~ E C~ O C6 C S ~ ~ N c0 Q ~ O r O C -O ° O ~ O- p C~ E O c~ L O ~ O - O - O C C ~ S O ~ ~ O N U O L O _ ~ Q ~ O O - ~ ~ *-~ ~ -p (/) O ~ O ~ - _O ~ ~ N O C p - ~ i 'O N O ~+ .~' c~S O O U ~ ~ ~ .C -C cn - C~ L ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ c _ C cam-o L fn ~ ro a ~r +-~ ~~ ~ U (~ a~-c~ > ~ U o' °-~ ~ i U °~ a`~ c N ~ _ O ~ U ,. C ..= /-- L ~ O C 'p _N ~ = O p N >+ p O Cd ~ N - C ~ _ C O C C ' C~ O C O (~ O ~ ~ ~ c~ O N O Q ~ L ~ -_ c0 O U N~ U E~ U ~ O C N~ O C O C~ ~~ c~ ~ O +- O O p N U U O N +-- cn -O ~ O_ O ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ >, ~ U ~ U ~ ~ C ~ ~ N -O _~ - ~ O ' i ~ ~ ~ O ~~ O O ~ ~ p ~~ ~ ~ Q O ~ ~_ ~ Q U ~ O ~ ~ ~ p n ~ ~ C ~ ~ p - in Q 7 CO C ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ CO Q N O C ~ ~ O N c~ pj ~ ~ p ~ N U c~ C O N U ~ ~ p , ~ ~ Q ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ U (n ~ c~ O ~ ~ O N ~_ p ~ U U ~ N ~ p U Cn O O '_ m 6 c~ U " (n U ~ N d ~ c N ~ to ~ O 6 ~ >~ c ^ ^ ^ (~ I- ~ ~ ~ ~ lL ~ N O T C~ ~ ~ U ~ c~ ~ O A 74 . . ~ v ~ v ~ N N N N N a a a a a Q 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 3 3 ~ a~ a~ m a~ m > a~ > a~ > o > m > o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , U U U U U m m m m m m m m m U >,~ mo c~ ~ o~µ- o^m m - ~ a~ ~ o c~ a~ c ~ o ~... ~ ~ ~_ 7 p ° ~ ~ ~o~ U- ~ L 0 0 0 -O O C C C O ° >~ ~ p y_.. c a~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ Q ~ _~ N ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ C to ~ O ~ O (lS ~ ~ U O_ O ~ .C O O ."C--~ C Q O E p C m l O O O E~ O O O U ~° O ~ ~ p „_, ~ ~ d p ~ ~ ^ O ~ ~ ~ .C ~ to ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ( - ~ ~ NCO _ O_ O Q ~ O .O ~ ~ L . O > U C O` N ~ T i U '~ C/) CO O Cn O Q. ~~ E~ C Q Q E O C N C a~~- `~ c °~ m- - E o~~~ ~ E~ ~ ~ m o " o ° c ~ ~ L o ~ c ~~m ~ 0 .~ Q~~ o c c~ ~ c O ~ mom ~~ ° oc~~c~~~ Q~oo m a E E a~ ~~ 0 ~~cn 0 ~ c a~ ~Eoox ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~~ C C~ O~ ~ c ~ C p~ ~ S ~ O ~ ~ O (~ V N d C (i3 ~ ~ C ~ N N Q Q '~ L p p (CS ~~ C c0 -O in c "-' ~ O U ~ cti O ~ ~` E Y O ~_ -O (n O ~ i L +-' O 'a ~ co p ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ CD C ~, 0 0 .--~ N ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ C i ~ ~ O N O i O ~ C i N ~ C 7 _- C~ In ~ E (~ ~ p O ~ ~ ~ +' _N ~ ~ O _ .~ ~ CO C E N C ~ ~ ~ "r O "~ O O ~ O > to ~ ~ Q ~ 2' ~ ~ Q O X 'S U (0 ~ ~ X N ~ C O O S 'O U O O C - O _ ~ ~ C m ~ O~ N~ C U ~ O O C C O 7 ' U "= .Q N ` O) p~ i ~ i N ~ O (~ _ 0. ~ ~- c0 ~ ~ f~ O co m cn E 7 "= 7 ~ C 7 O O U to N C '-' ~ 0 0~ U C1 .... O ~ 'D -p . ~ ~ ~ n ~ O O O 0 in - p .C C - ~ ~ _ O ~ O 0 ~ Q) ~ .L- ~ ~~o~ o~ ~~~ o~~o~N~~°~~~~~ o ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~o ~~ o O ~~ X oN~~~~~ ~ ~~ .~~ ~~~Q~ ~ o~ ~~w~ a~~° ~ C C ~ ~~ ~~~ C ~~.~ ~~~~ > ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ i '~ i - N - N ~ ~ C ~., LL.I C.3 ~ (SS ~ ~ ° ~ N C ~ L C ~ L ~ C C L p ~ ~ ~ O ~ ' 2 ~ O L O p 0_ ~ ~ 'a ~ U ~ O c0 c N O~ V C U~ O "J Q ~ a ~ ca F- E m ~ Q ~ m U ~ C c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C N N O ~ is a _ ~ O O >. 1- ~ ~ n. ~ • o • • A 75 • L ~ ~ ~ N N N ~ 'a a a Q _~ _~ _a 0 • O O O CJ ~ ~ N C ~ in ~ ~ N C C O ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ • m m m U . . m m m • U 00~°0`~0°' ~a:iaE~~~o c~cc~a~~L~~ ~vi~ ~~~o>,~ c.~.., ~ ~~~_oH~Z.~ ~ ~~~a~c~mmUa~ c c>>~ a~ c ~~ c-o 0 C N co T ~ ~ O to ~ ~ C O ~ N ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~- ~ O- Q O C~ ~ co ~'C-. C3 c~ L U ~ O O c~ N -O ~ > C O- ~ ~ O U C O Q ~ _~ t/~ ~~ w ~ ~ ~ N ~ C ~ 7 ~ ~ Cn O O a~ o >'" U ° ~ ~ ~~ ~ oc c-o (~ (n L O ~ o cw a>~ ~~ ° m ccn O - ~ ~ c~ ° m ro ~ m~ ~~ c a~ ~ . r ~ a -a m a ~ o c c c-a o ~ ~ "" p ~ ~ N ~ Z n.^c~ E.~ ~ E o ro o a ~ ~ ~--~~ ~E ~ O C O O C .O c~ a~ ~ ~ ` ~ Q- C N O C~ ~ ~Ozz o m ~~ .~` U~ C ~ Z m m Y~ E ~ ~ J ~ U O N L _ ~ ~ ~ fl. O ~ O C ~ 00 ~ _ ~ «.. ~ E a-- O N ~ ~ QC »-~ ~~~ O C ~ ~ .-. OM > _ ~ ~ ~ UL ~ _ + ~ ~ c~ O - ~_ -p ~ C U ~ ~ ~ L ` ~ N O ~ O in ~_ O C C O Q '~ ~ ~ O m ~ N >' n- w "- N ~ C -O C./) O L ~ ~ ~ ~ .. • O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y i ~ Q ~ C C O X N ~ > ~ U ~ C~ ~ O C ,~ C O ~ ~ O C C C~ (0 ~ ~ C C~ O) ~ i - O ~ c~ ~~ ~ to _ ~ ~ C p~~ >+ c N c~ ~ Q .-~ ~ U O~ m O N O U C O C (CS ~ O -O ~ U O O C~ N >' ~ O >, ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ "y U~ O P O ~ p E O O c~ C ~ O c~ ~ ~ a c0 m " Q C C O U c~ ~ ~ ~ U N ~ ~ O ~ O -O C c~ ~ 0 0 p Z O ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ - Z c~ ~ 6 ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 O C OU w ~ "' ~ c0 p ~ Q p~ ~ O ~ n • ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 in co N ~ ~ ~ N QU O O ~ O U ~ ~ ~ ~ O UJ p ~ C ca ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ O) ~ ~ O O ~ ~ U ~ ~ O O i O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ _N C C to N C ~ E ~ ~ C ~ ~ O U O~ ~ J' > C ~ U ~ O ~ ~ "O U O~ C N - C y ~ ~ ~ O C O _ co O `"' N C O > O J U~~ O~ E~ Q C C U= ~>> cO O c~ ~ to ~~ -O > C ~~ C~~ ~ O N~ p 7 0 a. ~ O ~ U w O~ ~] U O Z O p U~ U L C C O ti A 76 • d' Q '~ • ~ Q Q Q c 0 c 0 c 0 U D1 ~ U CT ~ U D1 ~ C ~ C ~ C ~ L ~ D O L ~ ~ O L ~ 0 U U U CD m ~ ~ O .~ Y c c~ c N > '_ > a~i cOn m ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ C ~ ~ '~ ~ .o ~f- m E_ c o 0 0 ~ o ~ ~- L ~ o-o~ ~ `~~ a O (n >' Q. O O L ~ >' ~ O O O ~ >' O Q O~~ ~ C ~ ~ > ~ O O N O C ~ ~ Cif ~ (LS "r ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ E U L .c C O Q Q O ~ O~ 'D ~ ~ O O ` (n O C _ ~ C ~ ~ U E x ~ ~ in . ~ C .. C J co O ?. `U. O N .C = to N d ~ ~ ~ C N - O ~ O a>~as-o ~ O O- ~ O c>tl ~ ~ ~ .--• N a cn~ E ~ a> ~ ~ c U ~ cn L m > c N c~o ~ c ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ O -O ~ U O ~ ~ ~ ~ N C E s N ~ ~ (~ ~' "O ~ ~ O N " O Q O p O~ C O N 7 0~ OU i U~ ' ~~ - a te C O U~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ Cn U C U ~ ~ N ctT ~ ~ O ~ O C '_ ~ O - L N Q 0 0 C .,_. L CSS C N ~ (ZS •--~ '""' O ~ O O m C C C (ZS C U -p 'O O N C -O C O i O O -p ~ V ~ i N~ 'D N C X 0 0 ~~ ~ O ~-O c~6 N ~~ ONO - N U U,.- O N ~ >,Q N O c cn ` Q CLS U~~ V O O U ~ N ~ = CO f >, `- N C ~ C CiY tts _ ~ ~ > O ~ ~ O O z ~ ~ O ~ Q- L ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O '~ O Q~ O -p ?~ p) •~ O N C ~ O _ O O ~ -p 'O U ~ "O ~ (b ~ 7 0 C L C ct5 ct5 rn O ~ j U~ O O~ C~ `"' U ~~ N Q O O~ a L -p .a ~ to 'D E .fl 0 U 'Y ~ O .-. i p~_ ~~ U C O .« (~ T O ~ ~ ~ cts ~ cts c c~ ~m~ ~ ~o N ~ N O Cn Q _ ~ f0 ~ p ~ ? ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ c > -a o~~a~oomLO~mc~ czs a~ - L~ ~ ~ °- ~-a °-~ c ~o~iactrc~o°~m U in .- a c U~ ~ L rn ~ in ~ in H c0 2 s ~ c L cts a U~ cn a m E ~ > U . ~ d N m C m C a 7 ~ ~ O 7 O ~ C O m p ~ p - O (U m (0 ~ CA C Ip U ~ O N ~ N O O ~ ~ C7 U ~c fl- ~ W -p -p -a o a~ 0 U O L t L ~ C_ Y p M,;. L_ L_ L C7 ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ cn ~ ~ U N C'7 V to CO f~ C CU N ~_ ~ ~ O a in r ~ a Q c O ~. ~_ a i m . ~° O O E ~ ~ U d L d (U ~ U L 7 ~ C O Y U (1) w ~ C _ [T U N ' a~ Q U i~ a ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ c L a i O O ~ ca ~ ~ Q m U ~ c m a A V o ~ p C O C U Q~ ~ p ` O ~ ~ C ` LL Z ~ U ~ 07 ~ O U j o N a m p s: W F - m o ~ O ,~ o p U ~ C ~ d ~ ~ O ~ O ~ 2^ Q m U ~ W (U (U c C71 N a~ 0 0 U N ~ N a~ C O C CT N C N E `~ ~ c °~ N m C p ~ m o ~ ~ ~ ~ -o ~ N > p a ~ N ~ ~ o io ~ ~ ~ ~ c 0 a o ~ E m o~ o~ U r N E c w -o ~ U = Q U ro Y ~ o E . ~ a U m ~ ~ ~ o p w 0 0 0 ~ U d U m d w N C O R d .Q Q N Y U N L U 0 a d Y • ~ • O • A 77 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00592 SUBJECT: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS APPLICANT: CHIEF PETER BRYAN FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT LOCATION: 93-ACRE SITE AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND UTICAAVENUE - APN 1089-581-01 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such actlon The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-51, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The appllcant shall be required to pay any applicable Flsh and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 b) Notice of Determination - $50 c) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 X d) Environmental Impact Report - $2,550 ~C-1-05 1 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00592StdCond 8-22 doc Comoletion Date -/-/- -/-/- / / ~- 7 Project No DRC2006-00592 Comoletion Date B. Time Limits 1 Development/Design Review approval shall expire if budding permits are not issued orapproved / /~ use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed _ C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / / site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and _ _ grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director _ _ _ 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Urnform Building Code and / / State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distract and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and budding elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of budding permits _ _ 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street innprovement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, _ _ _ building, etc ), or the approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _ /_/ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of budding permit issuance 7 A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved / / by the Planning Director and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of budding _ _ permits Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties 8 Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards The final design, locations, and / / the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to _ _ _ the issuance of budding permits 9 All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc ,shall be / / located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete _ _ _ or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults 10 All building numbers shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper / / illumination _ _ 11 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all / / lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice _ _ requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing D. Bui lding Design 1 Ali roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or _ /_/ projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and ~ streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally ~- ~~ Project No DRC2006 00592 integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director Details shall be included in building plans Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1 All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 18 feet long When a side of any parking space abuts a building, wall, support column, or other obstruction, the space shall be a minimum of 11 feet wide 2 Ali parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb) 3 Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses 4 All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards F. Trip Reduction 1 Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects of more than 10 units Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2 5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100 Where this results in a fraction of 0 5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number G. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 2 Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19 08 110, and so noted on the grading plans The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods 3 All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5 1 or greater slope, but less than 2 1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 4 All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2 1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 Completion Date / / / / -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- / / / / / / / / A 80 Protect No DRC2006-00592 Completion Date 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the • Engineering Department 6 Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the _/_1_ perimeter of this protect area shall be continuously maintained by the developer 7 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable), c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Protect Number (DRC2006-00592) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance 4 Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls _/_/_ 5 Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the _/_/_ Building and Safety Division I. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the protect file number (DRC2006-00592) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential protect or mafor addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees 4 A81 Project No DRC2006-00592 Completion Date Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tract/parcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through _/_/_ Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays - 5 Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department's public _/_/_ counter) J. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness construction 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations _/_/_ 3 Provide draft stops in attic areas, not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section _/_/_ 1505 4 Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/_ 5 Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A _/_/ _ 6 Upon tenant improvement plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed _/_/_ K. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/~/_ • Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time _/_/_ of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, _/_/_ submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for _/_/_ existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer L Additional Requirements/Comments 1 Project shall fully comply with accessibility requirements of 2001 California Building Code Chapter _/_/_ 11A 9 Housing Accessibility) • 5 A 82 Project No DRC2006-00592 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Corner property Ilne cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards N. Street Improvements Pursuant to Clty Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which Is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit Is required unless, In addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the Clty Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connectlons made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of Improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these condltlons of approval of development 2 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A C Pvmt Side- walk Dnve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Civic Center Dnve X X X Utica Avenue X X Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an In-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item 3 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street Improvement plans, Including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered CIVII Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer and the Clty Attorney guaranteeing completion of the pubiicand/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of bullding permits, vrhichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and Interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and Interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Completion Date L -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- • 6 A 83 Protect No DRC2006 00592 Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the Clty Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-Inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified e Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer f Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the Clty Engineer g Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be Installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots h Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check 4 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per Clty Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 5 Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street Improvement plans shall Include a Ilne Item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree Installation In those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans • The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Project Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size oty Civic Center Drive Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8' 30' O C 15 Gal Fill In P A Less Than 8' Pyrus calleryana NCN 3' 20' O C 15 gal 'Aristocrat' Utica Avenue N/O 6th Street P A 8' or Greater Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 8' 30' O C 15 Gal P A Less Than 8' Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree 5' 25' O C 15 Gai Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted In accordance with Clty standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Clty Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soli amendments, as determined by the City Inspector 3) Ali street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only O. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer • 7 Completion Date ~ _/_/ / / _/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. /_/_ A 84 Protect No DRC2006 00592 P Drainage and Flood Control 1 Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas Q Utilities 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them R General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first bwlding permit application is submitted to Building and Safety Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SEE ATTACHED Completion Date -/-/-• -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- • • 8 A 85 ,~ ! e~oR, , Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS August 14, 2006 RCFPD Headquarters NWC of Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue DRC2006-00592 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT At this time the fire flow can not be determined because the construction type has not been chosen The fire flow must be adequate for the type of construction and the square footage of the building An additional man door will be required to access the parking area from Utica This will also allow for better access to the exterior of the building (South Elevation) from the east side of the property A wet stand pipes combined with the automatic sprinkler system will be required in the center portion of the parking structure near an access door to the building The architect must design the exiting system to exit to the ground level without having to enter the underground parking structure The generator installation will not be permitted to be installed in the basement level (if any) A certificate of occupancy is required upon completion of the protect and prior to move in See the section below for the requirements prior to occupancy The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at h~ //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300-feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant For cut-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100-feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways ii At intersections A 86 iii On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire • District v A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire sprinklers are installed will be determined m gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are required for all protects that must extend the existing water supply to • or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until the public fire protection water plans are approved 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Commercial or industrial structures greater than 7,500 square feet 2 Assembly and Educational Occupancy Buildings A 87 FSC-5 Fire Alarm System • 1 RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code 2 Prior to installation of the building `s fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 3 Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 1 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1St story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20-feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46-feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12% Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus . 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows 3 A 88 a In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shalt be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before plaang the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review 8 Roof Access There shall be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential • structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road 4 A 89 a This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder b A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access c The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration d Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard e Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required f Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings g Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 9-9 Appendix A and drawings 9-9a and 9-9b h A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s) FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits • Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Battery Systems • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Refrigeration Systems • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Hazardous Materials • Tents, Canopies andlor Air Supported Structures • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings • 5 A 90 FSC-11 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to the County of San Bernardino The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by Building & Safety will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan California Government Code, Section 65850 2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speafic hazardous materials disclosure requirements A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility 2 Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a Plan, is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has complied with the provisions The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five (5) working days, if requested by the owner FSC-12 Hazardous Materials -Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials m accordance with the 2001 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD15 and FD39 and other implemented and/or adopted standards • FSC-13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the $92 review fee Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits Private Water Supply (F~re) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections 6 A91 2 All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the • installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard 9-8 4 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 5 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road 6 Fire Fiow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction • Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Pnor to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately • following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 7 A 92 5 Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service • 6 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 7 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted m accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services 8 Fire Access Roadways Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services 9 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non- illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 10 Hazardous Materials Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant must demonstrate (in writing from the County) that the facility has met or is meeting the Risk Management Plan (RMP) or Business Emergency/Contingency Plan with the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials/Emergency Response and • Enforcement Division The applicant must also obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services 11 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 12 Mapping Site Pian Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 '/z" x 11 " or 11 " x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • A 93 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Stiff Report DATE August 22, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Vance Pomeroy, Contract Planner SUBJECT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 -WLC ARCHITECTS - A review of the Master Phasing Plan for the remaining phases of the Lifeway Church project development including an education building, temporary classroom modules, a gymnasium and fellowship hall on 5 03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) at 7477 Vineyard Avenue at Calie • del Prado -APN 0208-921-36 The project has been determined categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as it qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 -Existing Facilities Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439, Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544 NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00544 -WLC ARCHITECTS - A request to operate a Private/Parochial School Use (Kindergarten through Grade 12) and Day Care Facility -Non Accessory at Lifeway Church in the education budding and related facilities located in the Low Density (2-4 du/ac) Residential District at 7477 Vineyard Avenue -APN 0208- 921-36 The project has been determined categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as it qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION This project is to allow the further development of the original Master Plan for the project site including the subsequent phases of a classroom building, gymnasium, and fellowship hall, and the operation of a Kindergarten through Grade 12 school at the site The protect site is located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue across from Red Hill Park, and now includes the sanctuary and offices along with fully developed parking • and landscaping Ife~ms B & C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00926 AND DRC2007-00544 - WLC Architects August 22, 2007 Page 2 • A Surrounding Land Use and Zornng North -Single-Family Residential, Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential South - Single-Family Residential, Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential East -Single-Family Residential, Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential West -Park, Open Space B General Plan Designations Project Site -Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling urnts per acre) Residential North -Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential South - Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential East -Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential West -Open Space C Site Characteristics The project site is the slope and crest of a hill that stands somewhat steeper than the land to the west and south and creates some interface issues with the surrounding single-family neighborhoods ANALYSIS A Master Plan On July 1, 2001, an application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 was filed for the construction and occupation of a church complex on Vineyard Avenue across from Red Hill Park The complex included several phases of construction with a sanctuary, offices, education building, fellowship hall, and gymnasium After concluding • the public hearing, the Planning Commission approved the project on April 24, 2002, with 15 Planning conditions, which include the following 7) The Master Plan is approved in concept only Future development for each building proposed in Phases 2, 3, and 4 shall be subject to separate Development Review process 9) This approval is for the operation of a church and office and does not include a daycare or private K-12 school Development Code Section 17 02 100, and repeated in the Standard Conditions for DRC2001-00439, is the requirement that building permits be obtained for buildings within five years and diligently pursued toward completion The Master Plan approved under DRC2001-00439 expired on April 24, 2007 without the building permits for the subsequent phases being issued The applicant submitted this new application, Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, for the remaining phases that had not obtained building permits prior to the expiration The application was accepted as complete prior to the April 24, 2007 expiration of the previous Conditional Use Permit Portable temporary classroom units were placed on the site in October, 2006 At the December 13, 2006, meeting, the Planning Commission determined that the portable temporary classroom units were part of Phase 1 and were not to be permanent but must be associated with a permanent building which has an active Conditional Use Permit The • permanent building to replace the temporary units is the classroom building which is part ~ ~ ~" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00926 AND DRC2007-00544 - WLC Architects August 22, 2007 Page 3 of Phase 2 With the expiration of the 2002 Conditional Use Permit, this subject Conditional Use Permit must be approved for the temporary classroom units to remain The duration of those units on the site will be determined in this review The Design Review Committee reviewed this project on June 19, 2007 Based on the application, applicant testimony, and the Planning Commission discussion and determination in December, the Committee recommended approval of the project (Exhibit E) Staff has included the recommended conditions of approval of the Design Review Committee into the attached draft Resolution Staff has also included a condition to clarify the status of the temporary portable classroom units vis-a-vis the permanent facilities for that function The intent of allowing temporary facilities for temporary occupation is that there is the anticipation of a permanent occupation of a permanent building for the same function The portable units serve as a temporary location to house the school and daycare facility that cannot be housed in any of the permanent buildings currently on the site At the moment, the Phase 1 buildings, the sanctuary, and the office building cannot serve to house the school or day care The Phase 2 classroom building apparently can house the entire school and day care functions as the classroom building is proposed as a two-story, 12,000 square foot structure and the temporary units are only about 4,200 square feet in floor area Therefore, the temporary portable classroom units should be removed as soon as the classroom building can be occupied or when the five-year life • of this approval has lapsed, whichever is first Staff has received some complaints about the project site since the December 13, 2006, Planning Commission meeting These complaints were confined to landscaping on the south slope, unsightliness of the portable classroom units from the southerly neighborhood, and lighting glare The landscaping was remedied per the landscape plan with the replacement of damaged trees However, staff is recommending additional review of the landscape plan as a condition of approval for this project The lighting complaint lodged with the Code Enforcement section has not been rendered as concluded B School Use The second application as part of this project is for the establishment and operation of a Kindergarten though Grade 12 school on the site The Low Density (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) Residential District in which this site is located allows "Schools, Private and Parochial" as a Conditional Use in general, Conditional Uses, as opposed to Permitted Uses which are allowed by right, are allowed only if found to be compatible on a site-specific, case-by-case basis with the surrounding land uses and with other possible permitted uses in that district If the Conditional Use is found to be compatible, it can be approved Otherwise, conditions must be set to make the use compatible in order to be able to approve the use at that location The church intends to create a new Kindergarten through Grade 12 elementary school for general instruction in the classroom building proposed as Phase 2 of the Master Plan portion of the project As a temporary measure while the classroom building is • constructed, the church intends to start the school by using the portable temporary classroom units to house the school A day care facility preschool for ages 2 through 5 is also planned ~~ ~ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2006-00926 AND DRC2007-00544 - WLC Architects August 22, 2007 Page 4 The operation is proposed to include as many as 187 children with up to 14 teachers and aides The hours of operation are 6 30 a m to 6 30 p m ,Monday through Friday The key potential impacts that the use could have on the surrounding single-family uses are parking/traffic and noise The existing parking lot consists of over 230 spaces, therefore, parking is adequate The potential for peak movements in and out of the parking lot would be no more, and likely much less, than the peak movements contemplated for the Sunday worship service times Any potential noise impact would be generated only when the students are outside During the period of potentially up to five years that the portable units are used for classroom space, this outdoor activity could take place where the education building is proposed However, it is unclear from the site plan where physical education activity is planned To minimize possible noise impacts, such activity should be concentrated toward the center of the site and confined to the hours between 8 00 a m and 5 00 p m Staff recommends that the location be designated by the applicant subject to the approval of the Planning Director :7 C Environmental Assessment The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities because the project will use the existing site and there is no substantial evidence that the • project may have a significant effect on the environment CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site As of the date of preparation of this report, three letters of opposition were received from neighbors in response to the legal noticing of the project RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926 and Non-Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544 subject to the conditions set forth in the accompanying draft resolutions Respectfully submitted, ~- Jam R Troyer, AICP Plan rig Director Attachments Exhibit A -Site Plan Exhibit 6 -Phasing Plan Exhibit C -Grading Plan Exhibit D -Planting Plan Exhibit E -Design Review Committee Action Agenda June 19, 2007 Exhibit F -Letters of Opposition . Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544 ~~ ~3~L~' _ ~ N Z Z _ _ ~ ~o o g d a ~ dN _" o ~ _ -- QQ i R V S Hln _ W Vm ~ Q== _""__ ? <~~ p g a a •i • • EXHIBIT A F g ~ s N ~ z R w w $ d ~ g H g Q a Q ~ ~ ~ ~ of _~ J Q } N =w~ Q (=j ~ g ~ o -- W ~ ~ a W ~ UZ Zaaw ~ ~~ ~ '~~. Z = ~ ~ ~ /~~ ~ Q y uZ-i cWn U ~ , s e M z Ua, ~..°~. ~ s _y P Q V V U J V ~~ dfaa p ~- ~ ~ ~a n J '' i ~ i i i ----~ ---~Q I~ W ~~ w J ~~ U ~ ~°~ ~ i ~~ ~i -1 ~ i~ ~i ~ vu r ~ M.x~-, _ ~ ------ ---- ----~------ 3n`d ^~ ^~ ^~ ^~ ^~ ~~ ^~ ^~ Q ]C -----------------------------------~--J------- c~ g z o . ~ U FQ ~~ xii m~ Z ~ °~wN 9 ~i> a O ~~~~ m O _ = ~ ~' y~~a~ "'~ vwip y~ Y ~~~~Z ~w° a~ a~ EXHIBIT B • ~, ~` i I S i ~ II ~ ~~ ~ i 1 ~n~ -+~~ --~ - ~~ • ti EXHIBIT C TK 's to ~s aa~ rcuvro ~ TI liHB N ro1VYI -I~1I( -_- I , - _ . I~ _._~ •; yl ~ ~ zz i ~ `~ ~~~1~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ J ', H ~ ~ ~kl~ $ e ~ ga `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 44444 ~ a ~ n. 9~ _ m ias ari roieva -~{ IC~l~GNro1VYa_-__--_- - ~ ~ ~ )~ pis -- __ ~'~; ~~~,. ~~ ~ -- -- -- - -----------=~ o ~ r ! ! 9 ------- ] ] ] ------ ] ! ----------------------------- ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 9 9 ! ! 9 ------------- ----- ! ] ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 7 6 t t t 3 7 3 t 6 t i f t t [ [ L [ f ~ ~~~ ~~ [ [ p p~ Q p! Q Q k A Y ~ S! kk k k A k a h 6 i e ~ % % T , ~ 7x3 , 73 T3 73 3 ~~ ~ I ~ ~ Y! A S S 7 0 ~ d a . 7 i 3~ 3 2 2 s ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ F 9 ~ tl d ~ Y ~I ~ tl Y ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 2 ~ ~ S~ 5 gg ~ gg@ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~~ gB B ~ ~ ~ A ~ A ~ S ~ ~` ~ . @ @ 9 ~ ~ ~ 0 p ~ N y ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ F ~ ~ M1 p 33 ~~ ~ k ~~ i ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ : Q$ a9 @ ~ ~ K 7 k ~ I I I I I I' I~ I • ®6 ® O EXHIBIT D s ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ s! ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ psi ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~a ~:~ . e a ~ ~c ~ ~~ c ~~, b ~ g ~Z , y~ N '~Nf g® n _.,. __ ~-- -- w x ~' o ~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ as r-a U ~~ O ~ YI g ° ~ <~ 9 44444 ~~~ g 1 ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ yes>>>~> > y > > > 00 00 B 00 0 s ~ B AC tc g ~rr trt rA ~~~~~~`It~~~~ ~ ~ o ~ Q @ Q @ @ F F & 6 ~ 9 ~ 9 8 ~ S 8 S ~ 8 ~ 8 8 ~ ~x~, ~~ j9 ~ ~pj j ~~Y ~~s geE ~ p~ ~€~ k k k k k A k k k k> e e i e Y~ ga i~@~ ~ S~ ~ y~`a~~ ~~~~3e~g ~ gggp~~ s~ k k k ~ k f k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~~ ~Ei ,87 ~ ~a~a A ~~~ap~i~ Q~~Q~/~ a 9~~6@ g~ Z l 4 t @Q ~~ i 7E ~~ F _~ a 4 9i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ •°~~@~ ~ ~ xx~ ~~ tl ~~~ C d! i ~ ~ ~ B i ~ X 3 ~ a ~-olololo ~iiiiiiii iii i ~~ 0 0000 ~, \~ ~I 1! g _ i -_~=`~~l t - ~ I~ I . R m ins a~n rnlero. Iii y ~ c¢i tas an rolwn I ~ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ (Y11~6 N 1U1V W _ _ - / _ _ .._ T 18G N FA1VW1 1(„/ DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Vance Pomeroy June 19, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS -Review of a Master Plan for the remaining phases of Lifeway Church protect development including education building, temporary classroom modules, gymnasium and fellowship hall on 5 03 acres of land m the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 7477 Vineyard Avenue at Calle del Prado - APN 0208-921-36 Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 Design Parameters On July 1, 2001, an application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001- 00439 was filed for the construction and occupation of a church complex on Vineyard Avenue across from Red Hill Park The complex included several phases of construction with a sanctuary, offices, education building, fellowship hall, and gymnasium After concluding the public hearing, the Planning Commission approved the protect on April 24, 2002 • Development Code Section 17 02 100 and repeated m the Standard Conditions for DRC2001- 00439, requires that building permits be obtained for all buildings within 5 years and diligently pursued toward completion The master plan approved under DRC2001-00439 expired on April 24, 2007, without the Building Permits for the subsequent phases being issued The applicant submitted this new application, Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, for the remaining phases that have not obtained Building Permits prior to their expiration Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee • discussion The owner of the property has worked closely with staff to work out any technical and design issues Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this protect At the December 13, 2006, Planning Commission meeting, the original protect approval was brought for clarification of conditions The issues surrounded the temporary classroom units and whether they were a part of the approved phases The portion of the determination pertinent to this application was that the temporary classroom units were part of the original approval of ail the phases, but that they must be associated with a permanent building which has an active Conditional Use Permit With the expiration of the 2002 CUP, a new CUP (the one before you) must be approved for the temporary classroom units to remain The permanent building to replace the temporary units is the education building included in the subtect CUP Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the protect as presented Design Review Committee Action Members Present Lou Munoz, Pam Stewart, Michael Diaz Staff Planner Vance Pomeroy • EXHIBIT E ~, ~ c ~o The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the following conditions. • 1. The remaining phases approved are: • Phase 2 -Education Building • Phase 3 - Fellowship Hall • Phase 4 -Gymnasium 2. The full five years permitted in Section 17.02 100 shall be extended to this approval including the other requirements and limitations of that section, except that the temporary classroom buildings shall be removed from the site by the end of the five year period regardless of the status of the progress of the several phases of the Master Plan or any extension that may be provided for the rest of the Master Plan's phases. 3 The temporary classroom buildings shall be maintained in good condition at all times including, but not limited to, paint. No signs and/or banners shall be installed and/or affixed to the temporary classroom buildings. Please note that, contrary to information conveyed at the meeting, per Planning Condition 9 for this project (DRC2001-00439), the approval" does not include a daycare or private K-12 school." "Private and Parochial Schools" is a conditional use in the Low Density Residential District and requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). In order to proceed with such a use, regardless of the buildings or facilities provided for the use, the CUP must be approved by the Planning Commission. The current request for the Master • Plan for the additional phases, DRC2006-00926, does not include a request for a private school. • ~~~ ~~ CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA August 7, 2UU7 AUG (~ ~ 200 To Pam Stewart, Chairperson • 6~ECEIVED - PLA~!~!~~!C We have received a letter from the city regarding a public hearing concerning the extension of the approval for the conditional use permit for the Lrfewa} Church at 7477 Vineyard Ave , adtacent to our propert} VVe appreciate bung notified of this hearmg, and intend to be there and voice our concerns However, we would also like to notrfiy you ahead, u1 writing of the problems this protect has caused for us and our neighborhood We first became alarmed about the protect during the rntrtral grading of the property when we realized rust what they were doing to the elevation of the landscape itself Dur uig a visit to the planning department regarding concerns about a vanance being granted to allow the height of the original church building to be above the standard allowance, there had been no mention of the height of future structures planned for the property behind the church We now wonder rf your department was even aware of Just what this would look like rn the end, or >f ther e were other reasons why we were not told At this time, as you are aware, there are a number of portable classrooms looming directly over our neighborhood, with very little landscaping or other ms,trgatron of any land to even attempt to soften the effect They were placed as close to the edge as possible, we assume to maximize the usuable land Since there rs no room for a block wall or fence we have the full view of air conditioning units, etc and rt looks very rnapproprate and out of place in a residential neighborhood The elevation itself rs inappropriate They sit way above the homes on the street below As you drive up Zircon toward the portables, the visual effect rs that the portables are right on top of the houses immediately below It rs our understandrna that future ermanent burldm~ s that are ro osed for the same location ma • b P bC) P P Y tower even higher than what's there now The portable buildings, as well as proposed future buildings are overwhelming and incompatible with the surroundings What's there now (the portables) rs very unsightly as well We feel embarassed when fiends who haven't been here recently, dive up to our house and say something to us about how hor-rble those buildings look They look conspicuously out of place, and something even larger on the same spot would look even more overwhelming As rs typical with buildings, the air conditioning units, pipes, etc are placed behind the buildings so as not to make the front of the buildings unsightly Therefore all the unsightly parts of the burldr<ngs are looming rn the air above our neighborhood for all of us to live under We have asked Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and some members of the Planning Commission to dnve up our street and have a Look for themselves We are asking all of the commission member s to take a look before the meeting on August 22 Please look, and consider how you would feel living rn our house, or rn this neighborhood It really seems that little consideration rs given for this part of town rn general anymore, and this protect rs r Bally a slap rn the face to those of us who ar e good citizens, tr}rng to keep this a decent community to live rn The protect looks nice from the front because you reap} don't see the portables and rt looks decent from the neighborhood above the project because rt seems that great pains have been taking to beautify that side of the propert} and not impact their view, yet the back end of the protect sits right on top of us The landscaping in the front and north of the property seems well taken care of, }~et the landscaping that was requrr ed to be put m place rn the small strip between our propert} and the chinch, rs very neglected They have already had to replace trees that dyed due to lack of water, blrt OIlly nl0rlths afteI We COIIlplalrled about Its The current • landscaping rs dying rn places now and obviously neglected EXHIBIT F ~`~ We also question the approprrateriess of a school housing up to 187 students planned for this location • We have a legrtrmate concerns about the noise and traffic such a school wvuld bring It seems much too intense for the area, and too close to homes When we first moved here, 26 years ago, there was an empty field next to us It was a hill with a gradual slope We had a view of the mountains, red-tailed hawks, and other wildlife While we wer e blessed tv have this empty area next to us for man} years, we realized that the property would eventually be developed However, rt never occurred to us that rt would be anything but residential homes, or that rt that rt would bring concerns such as the ones we've mentioned Please gyve thought to these issues and do what rs right for the existing community which has been so disrupted by this very inappropriate building prv~ect You have the authority to not extend the cosldrtronal use permit or allow further extension of this building project Please consider our positron, and how you would feel rf you were rn rte Thanks ~ c '~~,~I ti~U~/1'G'l ~~ ~ rr r Ul~ Barbara Rich cc Diane Williams Rex Gurtrerrez • ~~ ~~ (/~ Charles Rich ~~~3 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CITY OE RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUG ~ 3 2007 • RECEIVED -PLANNING Re NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00544 Operation of a Private/Pazochial School (Kindergarten through Crrade 12) and Day Care Facility at Lifeway Church, 7477 Vineyazd Avenue (APN 0208-921-36) Regazding the above proposal, as residents of this area, we have concerns as follows September through June, Alta Loma High School traffic adversely affects residents ability to enter or exit the azea using Vineyazd Avenue between Baseline and Carnelian. Both morning and afternoon, parents' and students' cars block intersections along Vineyard Avenue and traffic becomes snazled on Baseline as cars enter and exit the high school parking lots Year round sporting events at Red Hill Park create a tremendous amount of traffic as well as a large number of parked cars lining both sides of Vineyard Avenue wig parents and children crossing the street to reach the pazk. During the summer months, Concerts in the Park not only fill all available parking along Vineyard Avenue (as well as side streets) but create traffic jams making rt difficult to enter or leave the area during the time before and after the concert Our objection is not to a private/parochial school but to the added traffic it will create. A school and day care at Lifeway Church will add to the already over crowded streets during the same times of day Alta Loma High School traffic and sporting/entertainment traffic is heavy When the church was first proposed there was no objection on our part because Sunday mornings are not usually a heavy traffic time in this azea It was our thought that perhaps the church would allow the use of their parking facilities to supplement those of the park for special events The gate they have installed and the signs they post warning against pazking in their lot has shown us that we thought wrong Had we known they had the intention of opening a school and day care, adding hundreds more cars to an already over crowded street, we would have voiced our objection before then construction began. As rt is now, certain hours of the day, it is difficult (if not nearly unpossible) to enter Vineyard Avenue from intersecting streets Traffic backs up and cars block the intersections leaving residents sitting at stop signs until someone decides to leave space allowing them to proceed onto Vineyard Avenue. Traveling this area in the morning and corning home from work or leaving again in the evening become time consuming and frustrating experiences • • ~~ ~U Each child enrolled at Lifeway will have to be driven to and from the church each day Parents • drivmg their children to and from the church for school or day caze will probably be on their way to or from work, on a time schedule and in a hurry_ Adding more cars to this area, at the same time it is already over crowded, will not only add to the traffic problems and frustrations, but will create more safety issues for students, sports participants and those attending concerts who are crossing streets to reach their destination What began as a nice improvement to our neighborhood has taken on a new appearance as a possible detriment to the azea. We strongly suggest a traffic study be conducted before any further action is taken on this proposal Thank you for your consideration and attention to our concerns. Sincerely, G-p-~ David L and Debra K 7379 Garnet Street • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-7384 • ~ ¢~ /S ~C~ ~.. --- ~ -~ -~.°`~~, ~o Vim- ~jl ©c~ STP~IG'r _ 1..._i n-e _ a..~- ~.cm,~x,ocQ ~C9~ OE RANCHO Cfl,~CAMONGA ~ RECEIVED - RLANN6NG --~-~~.~-+~-~v, ,~,~ ~~C 1 ~ • RESOLUTION NO 07-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 FOR THE MASTER PLAN OF A CHURCH CAMPUS TO INCLUDE PHASE 2 EDUCATION BUILDING, PHASE 3 GYMNASIUM AND PHASE 4 FELLOWSHIP HALL IN THE LOW DENSITY (2 TO 4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 7477 VINEYARD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0208-921-36 A Recitals 1 WLC Architects filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 22nd day of August 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 22, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 7477 Vineyard Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 297 feet and lot depth of approximately 720 feet, and is presently improved with the Phase 1 sanctuary and office building of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439, and b The property to the north of the subject site is single-family residential, the property to the south consists ofsingle-family residential, the property to the east issingle-family residential, and the property to the west is a public park, and c The site has sufficient parking for the proposed uses at 234 spaces, and d The substantial site improvements, landscaping, lighting, and circulation are in place, and e The portable classroom units are only temporary and will be removed as part of the completion of this project ts~c ~~ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-52 DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS August 22, 2007 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 The Planning Department staff has determined that the protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The protect qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 because the protect will use the existing site In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the protect may have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent tudgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption • 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth • below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planrnng Department 1) All conditions (including Standard Conditions) set for Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 shall pertain to this protect except Planning Condition 7 Planning Condition 9 pertaining to a school or daycare facility shall be voided upon the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544 2) The remaining approved phases as shown on the Master Plan/Phasing Plan are Phase 2 -Classroom/Education Building Phase 3 -Fellowship Hall Phase 4 -Gymnasium Each of these buildings shall be reviewed and approved for architectural design by the Design Review Committee and Planning Director to determine the design compatibility with the other buildings on the site prior to building permit issuance 3) The full flue years permitted in Section 17 02 100 (Lapse of Approval and Extensions) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code shall be • extended to this approval including the other requirements and limitations of that section, except that the temporary classroom urnts shall be removed from the site no later than the end of the five-year f°~~C ~8 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-52 DRC2006-00926 - WLC ARCHITECTS August 22, 2007 • Page 3 period regardless of the status of the progress of the several phases of the Phasing Plan or any extension that may be provided for the rest of the phases of the Phasing Plan 4) In addition to the statement of absolute approval lapse for the temporary portable classroom units in Condition 3 above, the following condition shall operate as to the duration of these units on the site The eventual location for the school and daycare facility function is the Classroom/Education Budding of Phase 2 which is substantially larger than the temporary portable classroom units The other permanent buildings of the site may be used for the school and the day care facility as appropriate The temporary portable classroom units shall be vacated upon the approved occupancy of the Phase 2 classroom/education building or the end of the five-year approval period of this Conditional Use Permit, whichever is first The units must not remain on the site more than 90 days after this date 5) The temporary classroom units shall be maintained in good condition at all times including, but not limited to, paint No signs and/or banners shall be installed and/or affixed to the temporary classroom units 6) The submitted landscape/planting plan is to be re-inspected within 90 • days of the approval by the Planning Commission and upon the completion of each phase prior to final inspection clearance 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of August, 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS • NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~ ~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2006-00926 LIFEWAY CHURCH PHASING/MASTER PLAN & KINDERGARTEN THROUGH GRADE 12 SUBJECT: PRIVATE SCHOOL & DAY CARE FACILITY APPLICANT: WLC ARCHITECTS LOCATION: 7477 VINEYARD AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-52, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved In the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The appllcant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 ~C-1-OS I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00926StdCond 8-22 doc Completion Date -/-~ -/-/- _~ /_ ~~~ ~a Project No DRC2006-00926 Comaletion Date B. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include _/ /~ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file In the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director _ 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and /_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been compiled with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Flre Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be Inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevatlons incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits _ 5 All site, grading, landscape, Irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/ /_ consistency prior to Issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all / / other applicable Clty Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the _ _ _ time of building permit Issuance 7 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all _/_/_ lots for Planning Director and Clty Engineer approval, Including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction • activity, dust control measures, and security fencing C. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval _/ /_ Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED I \PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM12007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00926StdCond 8-22 doc ~~~ ~~ oN~, ~~a ~~w-,~~_M Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ,~ .. Fire Construction Services ~_ STANDARD CONDITIONS April 26, 2007 Lifeway Church Modular Classrooms, Fellowship Hall, Gymnasium & Educational Building 7477 Vineyard DRC2006-00926 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT This site is required to be annexed into the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's Community facility District 85-1 The process must be completed before issuance of the Building permits, allow 6 months for the completion the process, apply now The modular classroom buildings will also be required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers and/or a fire alarm system The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced m this document can be access on the web at http //www ci rancho-cucamonaa ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire • Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercial/industrial projects is 300 feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways ii At intersections iii On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District • v A minimum of forty feet (40') from any building ~ ~ ~a- c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided • d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed protect may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 2 Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site 3 The on ail site plans submitted for review must show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed m Assembly &Educational Occupancy Buildings 2 Commercial buildings greater than 7,499 square feet or larger 3 "All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) 4 When buildings do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 5 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprmkiered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code • • 2 !J ~~ 2 Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the building or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and speafications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services m accordance with RCFPD Fire • Alarm Standard #10-6 3 Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20 feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46 feet • d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent i Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) i Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in buildings in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply • 3 ~ ~ ~y a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward • c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan • illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the Judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities • District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits 4 ~ ~ °~.~ Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions • PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please com lete the followin rior to the p 9p issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Construction Access The access roads must be paved m accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet 6 inches above the finished surface of the road PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed m accordance with Fire Construction Services' • "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures " PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following• 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) • 5 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 5 ~ ~c ~-~ 6 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services • 7 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 8 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the bwlding setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks inmulti-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 9 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 10. Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8 1/2-inch by 11-inch • or 11-inch by 17-inch site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • 6 {3 ~C ~7 C RESOLUTION NO 07-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00544 FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PRIVATE SCHOOL (KINDERGARTEN THROUGH GRADE 12) AND DAYCARE FACILITY IN THE LOW DENSITY (2 TO 4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 7477 VINEYARD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0208-921-36 A Recitals 1 WLC Architects filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 22nd day of August 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planrnng Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 22, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to property located at 7477 Vineyard Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 297 feet and lot depth of approximately 720 feet, and is presently improved with the Phase 1 sanctuary and office building of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439, and b The property to the north of the subject site is single-family residential, the property to the south consists ofsingle-family residential, the property to the east issingle-family residential, and the property to the west is a public park, and c The site has sufficient parking for the proposed uses at 234 spaces, and place, and d The substantial site improvements, landscaping, lighting, and circulation are in • e The portable classroom units are only temporary and will be removed at the latest as part of the completion of the Phase 2 education building ~ ~C- ag PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-53 DRC2007-00544 - WLC ARCHITECTS August 22, 2007 Page 2 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distract in which the site is located b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity c The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 because the project will use the existing site In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent~udgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) This Conditional Use Permit shall void the prohibition of a daycare or private Kindergarten though Grade 12 school set in Planning Condition 9 of Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 2) The hours of operation are limited to between 6 30 a m and 6 30 p m , Monday through Friday Outdoor activity on the site shall be limited to between 8 00 a m and 5 00 p m ,Monday through Friday 3) The private school and daycare facility shall be limited to the enrollment of no more than 187 children total with no more than 8 teachers and no more than 6 teaching aides, excluding administration personnel 4) Subject to the review and approval of the Planning Director as to the precise location, the school operator shall provide the outdoor activity space or spaces on the site for the children exclusively toward the interior of the site 5) All drop-off and pick-up of children shall take place in the parking lot of the site • • • ~ ~~ a.q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-53 DRC2007-00544 - WLC ARCHITECTS August 22, 2007 Page 3 6) The school and daycare facility shall not use Red Hill Park parking lots for their parking 7) In addition to the statement of absolute approval lapse for the temporary portable classroom units currently on the site in Condition 3 of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, the following condition shall operate as to the duration of these urnts on the site The eventual location for the school and daycare facility function is the classroom/education building of Phase 2 which is substantially larger than the temporary portable classroom units The other buildings of the site may be used for the school and the day care facility as appropriate The temporary portable classroom units shall be vacated upon the approved occupancy of the Phase 2 classroom building or the end of the five-year approval period of Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, whichever is first The units must not remain on the site more than 90 days after this date 8) The temporary classroom buildings shall be maintained in good condition at all times including, but not limited to, paint No signs and/or banners shall be installed and/or affixed to the temporary • classroom buildings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of August, 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS • NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS ~~c ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: NON-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00544 LIFEWAY CHURCH PHASING/MASTER PLAN & KINDERGARTEN THROUGH GRADE 12 SUBJECT: PRIVATE SCHOOL & DAY CARE FACILITY APPLICANT: WLC ARCHITECTS LOCATION: 7477 VINEYARD AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-53, Standard Conditions, and ail environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary poor to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 B. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development • Code regulations I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00544StdCond 8-22 doc Comoletion Date -/_~ /_ / / /_ ~ ~ ~~ Project No DRC2007-00544 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director _ _ _ 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and / /~ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be _ submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be / / submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits _ _ 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / / consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment _ _ _ , building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all / / other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the _ _ time of building permit issuance 7 The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all / / lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval, including, but not limited to, public notice _ _ _ requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing C. Signs 1 The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval / / Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require _ _ _ separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs • APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 2 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2007-00544StdCond 8-22 doc ~ ~C~a ,~~_M_.„~~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District • ~ ~ exa~ `°.~ t Fire Construction Services }~ STANDARD CONDITIONS April 26, 2007 Lifeway Church Modular Classrooms, Fellowship Hall, Gymnasium & Educational Building 7477 Vineyard DRC2006-00926 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT This site is required to be annexed into the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's Community facility District 85-1 The process must be completed before issuance of the Building permits, allow 6 months for the completion the process, apply now The modular classroom buildings will also be required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers and/or a fire alarm system The RCFPD Procedures & Standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web • at http //www ci rancho-Cucamonga ca us/fire/index htm under the Fire Safety Division & Fire Construction Services section Search by article, the preceding number of the standard refers to the article Chose the appropriate article number then a drop down menu will appear, select the corresponding standard FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants mcommercial/industrial projects is 300 feet No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100 feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways ii At intersections iii On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District • v A minimum of forty feet (40') from any building l3 ~c 33 c If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided • d Provide one fire hydrant for each 1,000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof FSC-2 Fire Flow Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow 2 Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site 3 The on all site plans submitted for review must show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans FSC-4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in Assembly &Educational Occupancy Buildings 2 Commercial buildings greater than 7,499 square feet or larger 3 "All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) 4 When buildings do not meet the requirements of the 2001 California Building Code and the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lane Standard 9-7 5 When any applicable code or standard requires the structure to be sprinklered FSC-5 Fire Alarm System RCFPD Ordinance 15, based on use or floor area (or by other adopted codes or standards) requires an automatic and/or manual fire alarm system Refer to RCFPD Ordinances 15 and 39, the California Building Code, RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard #10-6 and/or the California Fire Code C7 • 2 f3 ~c 3 y 2 Prior to any removal, remodel, modification and/or additions to the building or suite's fire alarm system, Fire Construction Services' approval and a building permit must be obtained Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire • Alarm Standard #10-6 3 Based on the number of sprinkler heads, the sprinkler system is required to monitored by a listed central station fire alarm system FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 Location of Access All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building Landscaped areas, unpaved changes m elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions 2 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20 feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46 feet • d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus 3 Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided in buildings m accordance with the 2001 California Building Code, Fire and/or any other applicable standards 4 Access Walkways Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings 5 Commercial/Industrial Gates Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be • in accordance with Fire District Standard #9-2 The following design requirements apply 3 Y~~~3s a Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS b Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward • c Gates may be motorized or manual d When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet e Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock available at the Fire Safety Office for $20 00 f Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second g The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and afail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction h Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex ~ if traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations 6 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan • illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included m the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval 7 Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit, field inspection is required prior to permit issuance General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles m Assembly Buildings FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities • District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits 4 f~~C 3~ Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions r PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF B I - U LDING PERMITS Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Budding & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 2 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with ail the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet 6 inches above the finished surface of the road PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER • The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures " PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway m accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers " On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, m the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Sprinkler System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 4 Fire Sprinkler Monitoring Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power) 5 Fire Alarm System Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm s stem Y shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services 5 ~~~~ 6 Access Control Gates Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services • 7 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed m accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 8 Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi- family buildings shall post the address with minimum 8-inch numbers on contrasting background, visible from the street and electrically illuminated during periods of darkness When the building setback exceeds 200 feet from the public street, an additional non-illuminated 6-inch minimum number address shall be provided at the property entrance Larger address numbers will be required on buildings located on wide streets or built with large setbacks in multi-tenant commercial and industrial buildings The suite designation numbers and/or letters shall be provided on the front and back of all suites 9 Confidential Business Occupancy Information The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form This form provides contact information for Fire District use m the event of an emergency at the subject bwidmg or property This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector 10. Mapping Site Plan Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8 1 /2-inch by 11-inch or 11-inch by 17-inch site plan of the site m accordance with RCFPD Standard #13-1 shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required m the standard The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector • 6 ~~ c 3 ~ / , ~~i DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING TUESDAY AUGUST 14, 2007 7 00 P M RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Members Lou Munoz Pam Stewart Michael Diaz Alternates Richard Fletcher Frances Howdyshell Ray Wimberly CONSENT CALENDAR 700pm (Tabs/Shelley) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18196 - FERRERA - A request to subdivide a property of 1 acre into three parcels in the Low (L) Residential District, located at 6970 East Avenue -APN 0227-121-34 PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS 710pm (Mike S /Shelley) HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00719 -HECTOR RUIZ - A request to construct two single-family residences, each with a total floor area of about 9,900 square feet (footprint approximately 6,000 square feet) on parcels of 21,648 and 22,640 square feet in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, located at Deer Canyon Drive -APN 1074-471-26 and 27 730pm (Mike S /Mark) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18680 -THE WILLIAM FOX GROUP - A review of a proposed parcel map for condominium purposes in the General Industnal (GI) District, Subarea 13, located at the east side of Charles Smith Avenue, about 1,000 feet south of 6th Street -APN 0229-283-02 Related file Development Review DRC2007-00253 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00253 - THE WILLIAM FOX GROUP - A proposal to construct a budding of about 22,680 square feet on a vacant parcel of 1 23 acre in the General Industnal Distract, Subarea 13, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue -APN 0229-283-02 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18680 750pm (Lany~llie) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18544 - OPUS WEST - A request to divide one parcel into 3 parcels on a 9 87 acre property, located on the west side of Haven Avenue between Civic Center Dnve and Arrow Route -APN 0208-341-15 Related Fde Development Review DRC2007-00244 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00244 - OPUS WEST - A review of an application for the office project comprised of one 4-story, 139,144 square foot building, and two single-story retail buildings of 6,800 and 7,200 square feet, and a bank with a drive thna of 5,000 square feet, with a CUP for • incidental retail (Up to 20 percent) on a 9 87 acre property, located on the west side of Haven Avenue between Civic Center Drive and Arrow Route -APN 0208-341-15 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18544 DRC AGENDA August 14, 2007 Page 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting Comments are limited to five minutes per mdiwdual ADJOURNMENT 1, Melissa Andnewin, Office Specral~st 11 for fhe City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of fhe foregoing agenda was posted on August 9, 2007, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954 2 at 10500 C~wc Center Dnve, Rancho Cucamonga • • CONSENT CALENDAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 00 p m Tabe van der Zwagg August 14, 2007 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18196 - FERRERA - A request to subdivide a property of 1 acre into three parcels m the Low (L) Residential District, located at 6970 East Avenue - APN 0227-121-34 Design Parameters The project site is located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Victoria Street on a 1-acre parcel The parcel is generally rectangular in shape with overall dimensions of about 320 feet from east-to-west and about 135 feet from north-to-south The existing topography slopes gently from north-to-south The lots to the north, south, and east are zoned Low Residential and developed with single-family residences The lot to the west is zoned Low Residential and has been approved fora 6-lot subdivision (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578) and will be developed by the same applicant as the subject site Anew cul-de-sac will be built to access both projects, with all lots taking access off of this new street The applicant proposes subdividing the site into three lots There is an existing house on the site that is proposed to be removed The lots meet all City development requirements except for lot average The required lot average m the Low Residential District is 15,000 square feet The proposed lot average is about 14,400 square feet The applicant has submitted a Variance request with the justification being that without a Variance the lots would be much larger than the 6-lot subdivision to the west with which it shares the cul-de-sac The approved lots to the west range m size from 13,513 square feet to 16,419 square feet Staff is contemplating including a condition of approval which states that the future home on Lot 1, which faces East Avenue, be developed with a single-story home in order for the project to be more compatible with the existing single-story homes adjacent to the project Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Mayor Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the required average lot size of 15,000 square feet Secondary Issues The lots are not evenly sized (15,451, 15,412, and 12,354 square feet) Staff feels that this may make the development of the smaller lot more difficult The smaller lot, though, does meet all the minimum Development Code requirements Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the proposed parcel map as submitted to the Planning Commission Design Review Committee Action • Staff Planner Tabe van der Zwagg Members Present . DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 10 p m Mike Smith August 14, 2007 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00719 - HECTOR RUIZ - A request to construct 2single-family residences, each with a total floor area of about 9,900 square feet (footprint approximately 6,000 square feet) on parcels of 21,648 and 22,640 square feet in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, located at Deer Canyon Drive - APN 1074-471-26 and 27 Background The proposed single-family residences were reviewed by the Design Review Committee on March 20, 2007, and a follow-up review on June 5, 2007 The Committee did not accept the design for these principal reasons • The unusual roof (a "truncated" roof with parapets) that was proposed for both houses was inconsistent with the neighborhood and not typical for the residences m general • The stone finishes on the north elevations of each house, were not uniformly applied m equal proportions on the south, east, and west elevations Trim should be limited to one architectural design and material Also, the houses were too similar m appearance and, at a minimum, the use of different materials/trim should be used to set them apart • The form and massing of the houses combined with the eclectic mix of trim and materials • did not clearly project a coherent architectural theme Furthermore, it did not appear that the client's expectations were understood by the architect nor could they be achieved • The architectural drawings did not "read" well, i e details were not drawn correctly Also, interpretation of the plans was difficult because of the missing shading that would normally provide an impression of depth and relief on atwo-dimensional drawing The applicant was directed to revise the proposal and resubmit for Committee review Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Since the last review meeting, a new architect has been retained for this project The new architect has revised the architecture and the plans to reflect the comments noted above The roofs of each house are now conventional in their design and consistent with the neighborhood and residences m general Another significant change is both houses are clearly different Considering they have the same exact floor plan, the previous architect was encouraged to explore ways to differentiate the two houses The new architect has achieved this goal by providing differences between the two houses by varying the following areas the front entrances, "tower" elements above the foyers, roof lines, front and rear balconies, windows/window trim, application of decorative stone veneer, and colors The architectural theme for each house is now focused and distinct Both houses now reflect the City's design standards and goals To assist the Committee, the architect has provided renderings that convey the "movement" of the wall planes Secondary Issues The following issues must be revised and will be verified during Building and Safety plan check DRC AGENDA DRC2006-00719 -HECTOR RUIZ August 14, 2007 Page 2 Walls shall be limited to a maximum height of 6 feet while the maximum height of retaining walls is 4 feet (m both the instances, the maximum height is 3 feet when the wall is located within the front yard setback area) Note walls and fences shall not encroach into the equestrian easement located along Deer Canyon Road 2 The maximum lot coverage within the Very Low (VL) Residential District is 25 percent including the roof overhangs The proposed lot coverage is 20 percent The plans submitted for plan check shall have the correct lot coverage Furthermore, the property owners shall be notified that any future additions or structures on each respective lot are restricted by this lot coverage limit Staff Recommendation Staff believes the revisions address the concerns indicated by the Committee and the outcome is very positive Any additional changes can be addressed as conditions of approval Staff recommends approval of the project to the Committee Design Review Committee Action Staff Planner Mike Smith Members Present • • • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 30 p m Mike Smith August 14, 2007 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18680 -THE WILLIAM FOX GROUP - A review of a proposed parcel map for condominium purposes m the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 13, located at the east side of Charles Smith Avenue, about 1,000 feet south of 6th Street -APN 0229-283-02 Related file Development Review DRC2007-00253 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00253 -THE WILLIAM FOX GROUP - A proposal to construct a building of about 22,680 square feet on a vacant parcel of 1 23 acre m the General Industrial District, Subarea 13, located at 9275 Charles Smith Avenue -APN 0229-283-02 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18680 Design Parameters The project site is a rectangular parcel of about 330 feet (north to south) by 165 feet (east to west) The site is vacant and is dominated by short grasses and shrubs The property is bound on the east by the I-15 Freeway To the north is a small office/warehouse complex comprised of two buildings while to the south is a refueling station Across the street are numerous warehouse buildings ranging in size between 50,000 to 200,000 square feet The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties are within the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 13 The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and • south sides of about 1,083 and 1,077 feet, respectively The applicant proposes an office/warehouse of 22,680 square feet The building will be subdivided into three condominium units with their own office and warehouse spaces In addition to the first floor, the office each of the units will have a second floor office The office areas will be located along the east side of the building with their corresponding entrances facing the freeway The building will have three roll-up doors to allow access to the warehouse area of each unit Because of the layout of the building, the doors are not located next to each other or on the same building elevation Instead there will be one door on each side except to the west (facing the street) There will be two points of access via Charles Smith Avenue Sixty-four parking stalls for employees and customers will be provided with the majority being located at the east side of the project site The remainder will be at the south and north sides of the site There will be no dedicated truck parking, however, there will space for loading/unloading at the roll-up doors Landscape coverage is 16 2 percent, the minimum requirement is 12 percent for this development district The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up construction painted with a palette of four different colors An additional primary material will be stackstone veneer while a secondary material will be glass panels Key features include tower elements with raised parapets and stone-veneered flared "legs " Each office area has a canopy over its respective entry Glass is generously incorporated around each office area on both floors, at the towers, and at equal intervals along the east elevation Glass panels are provided to a lesser extent along the west elevation stackstone veneer will be applied to the "legs" of each tower element The midpoint tower at the east elevation will have stackstone applied to its entire face while the midpoint tower at the west elevation will have this veneer limited to the lower 13 feet of its face The top edge of the parapets at each tower element will incorporate aform-lined relief Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion DRC AGENDA SUBTPM18680 AND DRC2007-00253 -WILLIAM FOX GROUP August 14, 2007 Page 2 Major Issues The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project In general, architectural elements have not been uniformly applied The following changes are recommended Provide additional glass panels on the west elevation This elevation faces Charles Smith Avenue and, in comparison to the east elevation, is relatively bare 2 Apply stacked stone on the entire face of the midpoint tower located at the west side of the building to match the tower located on the east side of the building 3 Provide a continuous form-lined relief along the entire top edge of the parapet 4 Indicate the potential or target uses for the proposed center and how on-site parking was determined and will be maintained by the property owner to support future uses Based on submitted plans, on-site parking has been calculated for a warehouse use with limited office areas This means that future alterations to the office areas or allowing a more intensive use will not be allowed because of inadequate on-site parking to support these potential changes Prospective tenants must be notified of these limitations Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues • Add overhead trellis at the employee lunch area The overhead trellis shall have cross • members spaced no more than 18-inch on center with minimum dimensions of 4 inches by 12 inches Also, each support column shall have a decorative base that incorporates the architectural finishes/trim used on the building such as stacked stone and decorative cap The trellis shall be painted to match the building 2 Provide a draft Uniform Sign Program for the project including drawings indicated overall quantity and placement of signs on the building and site A final approved sign program is required prior to the installation of any signs at the site Policy Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion Incorporate undulating berms along the Charles Smith Avenue frontage within the landscape setback and landscape areas 2 Landscaping along the shared property line with the I-15 Freeway shall include a minimum of one 24-inch box tree per 3 parking stalls, shrubs spaced 18 inches on center, and appropriate ground cover 3 All ground-mounted equipment, utility boxes including transformers, and back-flow devices shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18" on center 4 Decorative paving shall be provided at the primary vehicular access point on to the site 5 Ail doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of • the adjacent wall or glass panel DRC AGENDA SUBTPM18680 AND DRC2007-00253 -WILLIAM FOX GROUP August 14, 2007 • Page 3 6 Provide durable street furniture m the outdoor employee eating area, such as tables, chairs, waste receptacles 7 All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similarly dark color Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the project be revised, as noted above, and resubmitted for review by the Committee prior to being forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action Design Review Committee Action Staff Planner Mike Smith Members Present • • • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7 50 p m Larry Henderson August 14, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18544 -OPUS WEST - A request to divide one parcel into 3 parcels on a 9 87 acre property, located on the west side of Haven Avenue between Civic Center Drive and Arrow Route -APN 0208-341-15 Related File Development Review DRC2007-00244 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00244 -OPUS WEST - A review of an application for the office protect comprised of one 4-story, 139,144 square foot building, and two single-story retail buildings of 6,800 and 7,200 square feet, and a bank with a drive thru of 5,000 square feet, with a CUP for incidental retail (Up to 20 percent) on a 9 87 acre property, located on the west side of Haven Avenue between Civic Center Drive and Arrow Route -APN 0208-341-15 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18544 Continued from the July 31, 2007, Design Review Committee (Plans and comments to follow under separate cover) Attachment Design Review Committee Action • Staff Planner Larry Henderson Members Present DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7 40 p m Larry Henderson July 31, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18544 -OPUS WEST - A request to divide one parcel into 3 parcels on a 9 87 acre property, located on the west side of Haven Avenue between Civic Center Drive and Arrow Route- APN 0208-341-15 Related File Development Review DRC2007-00244 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2007-00244 -OPUS WEST - A review of an application for the office project comprised of one 4-story, 139,144 square foot building, and two single-story retail buildings of 6,800 and 7,200 square feet, and a bank with a drive thru of 5,000 square feet, with a CUP for incidental retail (Up to 20 percent) on a 9 87 acre property, located on the west side of Haven Avenue between Civic Center Dnve and Arrow Route-APN 0208-341-15 Related File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18544 Design Parameters The subject property is a relatively flat site which contains portions of a remnant vineyard The Parcel is within the Haven Office Overlay Zone and there are no public improvements on the Haven Avenue frontage The undergrounding of existing utility poles will be required The site is vacant Office/Commercial to the north and south, there is existing Office/Commercial to the east across Haven Avenue, and the site to the west is bordered by existing apartments The site is also in proximity to the existing Civic Center • Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Major Issues There are no mayor issues The overall architecture and massing is compatible with the Haven Office Overlay Zone Secondary Issues Once all of the mayor issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues Pedestrian amernties are not clearly identified or developed at the street intersections, driveway connections, walkway connections, or the amval plaza area on the west side of the office building 2 A Sign Program has not been submitted and with the retail buildings component particular care needs to be taken that the office campus atmosphere required under the Haven Office Overlay is not undermined 3 The project is proposed without a phasing plan even though the bank does not have any architecture proposed The applicant would like to provide a building pad only with all other improvements constructed around the building site Policv Issues The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion • DRC ACTION AGENDA July 31, 2007 Page 2 • 1 Pedestrian Orientation Colonnades or loggias and other covered walkwa s or structures Y that provide shade to pedestrian spaces shall be utilized whenever possible Employee outdoor eating areas shall be provided as an integral part of site designs Consideration is recommended as in the above comment "pedestrian amernties" 2 Architecture within a Master Planned development shall have a compatible design style, with variation, in the building style, form, and materials in accordance with the architectural standards of the Overlay District It is noted that the proposed bank is not specified It is recommended that a minimum condition of approval for architectural consistency for the future bank budding be accepted 3 Pedestrian plazas or courtyards shall be designed to create an attractive, comfortable, and functional setting with a "sense of place " A combination of the follownng design elements are encouraged, but are not limited to pavement or surface texture, elevat~oNgrade changes, use of landscape materials and stnactures to provide shade and define enclosed spaces, seating (e g , benches, steps, or raised planters), and outdoor eating areas In addition, the use of water features, covered walkways, kiosks and public art are encouraged Redesign to meet this requirement 4 Accent treatment such as changes in exterior materials and texture is encouraged in conjunction with venation in the mayor form-giving elements of a structure The retail building component does not meet these criteria and it had been previously recommended that a redesign that is at least two-story in nature (retail 1st floor/office 2nd floor) that is • consistent with the architecture of the office budding be used The current proposal has portions of these buildings at a story and a half This could be a compromise, however, the DRC needs to determine if this is sufficient or if they would prefer atwo-story appearance at least at the portions closest to the Haven Avenue and Arrow Route intersection In addition, the applicants were encouraged to create a deeper entry offset to emphasize the entrance area DRC should consider this aspect and provide direction The Haven frontage of the office budding is not an entrance The DRC could consider or recommend a similar treatment as what was used at the Civic Center, which consists of a formal but non-functional entrance 5 A consistent streetscape design theme shall be developed along the Haven Avenue streetscape, which incorporates intensified landscaping with specimen size trees, alluvial rockscape, mounding, meandering sidewalks, and appropriate street furniture Landscaping materials shall be selected which provide a historic link to the City's past, such as Eucalyptus windrows, citrus trees, and grape vines In addition, a program of street name monument signs shall be developed to include low profile, natural alluvial rock monument signs with individual letters formed in a sandblasted concrete face Please note that the extensive areas proposed along Haven Avenue for the water quality retention has never been as extensively proposed as shown Please provide a cross section analysis as previously discussed Other recent submittals for Haven Overlay properties have included the use of stacked stone instead of alluvial rock and vineyard planting and have received favorable consideration 6 A coordinated Uniform Sign Program shall be required for any development, including wall and monument signs Budding wall signs shall consist of the individual letters Canned • signs are prohibited The size, number, typical design, and the location of the signs, as permitted by the City's Sign Ordinance, shall be submitted with the development applicalJOn and be reviewed concurrently A sign program for the entire property is required DRC ACTION AGENDA July 31, 2007 Page 3 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Committee to review any Applicant clanfications on the design issues and provide direction accordingly Staff determined that this project should be brought back to DRC for full review as a continued item on July 31, 2007 The following comment applies The corner plaza needs to be an integrated and fortified architectural strong point through 2nd story appearance, canopy, or tower element and include pedestnan connections 2 Revise the sign program to reflect no budding signs on the street side of the structure as offered by the applicant Plans will not be available for circulation before the meeting Design Review Committee Action Members Present Stewart, Munoz, Nicholson Staff Planner Larry Henderson Since the applicant was unable to provide revised plans for the meeting, the Committee continued the item until such time as a re-submittal is made to staff with appropnate number of copes and time to prepare wntten (staff) comments for the Committee to consider • n U CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on August 22, 2007, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission continued the following item(s) to its meeting to be held on September 12, 2007 NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMITDRC2007-00544 -WLC ARCHITECTS - A request to operate a Private/Parochial School use (Kindergarten through Grade 12) and Day Care Facility -Non Accessory at Lifeway Church m the Education Building and related facilities located in the Low Density (2-4 du/ac) Residential District at 7477 Vineyard Avenue APN 0208-921-36 The project has been determined categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as it qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2006-00926, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - DRC2006-00926 -WLC ARCHITECTS - Review of Master Phasing Plan for the remaining phases of Lifeway Church project development including an education building, temporary classroom modules, a gymnasium and fellowship hall on 5 03 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) at 7477 Vineyard Avenue at Calle del Prado -APN 208- 921-36 The project has been determined categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as it qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities Related Files Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00439, Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit DRC2007-00544 The meeting will be held at 7 00 p m m the Council Chambers at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California Said continuance was passed by the following vote Ayes FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY Noes NONE Absent NONE Abstain NONE Date August 23, 2007 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Lois J Schrader, declare as follows I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, that at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on August 22, 2007, said public hearing was opened and continued to the time and place specified in the NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE shown above, and that on August 23, 2007, at the hour of 4 00 p m , a copy of said notice was posted in a conspicuous place near the door m which said meeting was held I declare under penalty of penury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed on August 23, 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California ~. ~- Lois J Schr ~ er Planning Commission Secretary ~i~ ~~ ~~~1~~~ l;u~~~~~~~ August 7, 2007 To Lou Munoz We have r ecerved a letter from the city regarding a public hearing concerning the extension of the approval for the conditional use permit for the Lifeway Church at 7477 Vineyard Ave , adjacent to our property We appreciate being notified of this hearing, and intend to be then e and voice our concerns However, we would also like to notifiy you ahead, rn wi sting of the problems this project has caused for us and our neighborhood We first became alarmed about the project during the uitrtial grading of the property when we realized dust what they were doing to the elevation of the landscape itself During a visit to the planning department r egai ding concerns about a variance being granted to allow the height of the or igmal church building to be above the standard allowance, there had been no mention of the height of future structures planned foi the property behind the church We now wonder if y our department was even aware of~ust what this would look like in the end, or if there were other reasons why we were not told At this time, as you are aware, there aie a number of portable classrooms looming directly over our neighborhood, with very little landscaping of other mitigation of any kind to even attempt to soften the effect They were placed as close to the edge as possible, we assume to maximize the usuable land Since there is no room foi a block wall or fence we have the full view of air conditioning units, etc and rt looks very inappropriate and out of place m a residential neighborhood The elevation itself is inappropriate They sit way above the homes on the street below As you drive up Zircon toward the portables, the visual effect is that the portables are right on top of the houses immediately below It rs our understanding that future permanent building{s) that aie proposed for the same location may tower even higher than what's there now The portable buildings, as well as proposed future buildings are overwhelming and incompatible with the surroundings What's there now (the portables} is very unsightly as well We feel embarassed when friends who haven't been here recently, drive up to ow house and say something to us about how horrible those buildings look They look conspicuously out of place, and something even larger on the same spot would look even more overwhelming AS is t} pical with buildings, the an conditioning units, pipes, etc are placed behind the buildings so as not to make the front of the buildings unsightly Therefore all the unsightly parts of the buildings aie loommng in the air above our neighborhood for all of us to live under We have asked Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and some members of the Planning Commissivn to drive up our street and have a look far themselves We are asking all of the commission members to take a look before the meeting on August 22 Please look, and consider how y ou would feel living ui our house, of in this neighbor hood It r catty seems that little consideration is given fvr this part of town ur general anymore, and this pr o~ect is r catty a slap m the face to those of us who ar e good citizens, trying to keep this a decent community to live in The project looks nice from the front because you really don't see the portables and it looks decent from the neighborhood above the project because rt seems that gi eat pains have been taking to beautifj that side of the property and not impact then view, } et the back end of the protect sits right on top of us The Iandscapnlg in the front and not th of the pr open} seems well taken car e of, yet the landscaping that was required to be put rn place in the small strip between our property and the church, is vei} neglected They have already had to replace trees that died due to lack of water, but only months after we complained about rt ~ The cur rent landscaping is dying rn places now and obviously neglected We also question the appiop~iateness of a school housing up to 1~7 students planned for this location We have a legitimate concerns about the noise and traffic such a school would b~mg It seems much too intense for the area, and too close to homes When we first moved here, 26 years ago, there was an empt} field next to us It was a hill with a gradual slope We had a view of the mountains, red-tailed hawks, and other wildlife While we were blessed to have this empty area next to us for manyyear5, we realized that the property would eventuall} be developed I-aowevei, it never occu~ted to us that it would be an}thing but residential homes, or that it that rt would brnlg coneer ns such as the ones we've mentioned Please gwe thought to these issues and do what is right for the ex~st~ng communit} which has been so disrupted by this very inappropriate building ptv~ect You have the authority to not extend the c,ondrtional use permit or allow fut~ther extension of this buildrng pio~ect Please consider our position, and how y ou would feel if y ou were Pn ~t ~ Thanks i ~ _~ n , ~ti~~~~~ 1c ~ ~~~,~~~5 I~~ ~,~ Barbara Rich Charles Rich cc Dune Williams Rex Guitiei-rez Windows Live Hotmall Windows Llve" Hotmall Gwyn Frost Ms~~ ~ ~~ Jgwyn@hotmail coin Sign out Inbox New Reply Reply all Forward ,Delete Junk _ 1 Junk Move to __ ~ Options ~r: Drafts Johnston Sent From Ga-yn 8c )gym Frost (matticefrost@hotmad coin) Deleted Sent Wed 8/22/07 6 54 AM Manage folders To Jennifer@integntidev coin Cc J arncic@worldnet att net Today Auto Select Mail Jennifer, _ Contacts Calendar 'Just an update after our conversation yesterday afternoon since I couldn't sleep this morning FYI, Gwyn was able to talk to several of the Etiwanda Historical Society Board members last evening, and the balance are being contacted today The EHS will be bidding on the ebay documents, and I didn't want them to be in a bidding war with anyone else interested in returning the files to the community So if you hear of another bidder, we need to talk It is my understanding that several years ago, while the Chaffey barn was being built, Bob Hickcox entrusted your grandfather with most of his historic documents relating to Etiwanda water Do you happen to know if they may have been included with the Johnston stuffy It seemed that the Etiwanda Water Company Articles of Incorporation, included in the ebay items, could have been the originals If so, the document pre-dates the Johnston arrival by about six years As a final item, years ago Jerry created the first Chaffey-Garcia video I had loaned your grandfather several 35mm slides and prints, many of which were reproduced in the video Do you happen to know if the photos still exist? Thanks Jennifer to be continued Jim Now you can see trouble before he arnves http //nevvlivehotmail coin/~ocid=TkT_TAGI-IM_migration_HM_viral_protection_0507 Reply Reply all Forward ,Delete - ~ Move to Want to race through your Inbox even faster? _i ry the full version of 1fNindows Live Hotmall (It's free, too ) © 2007 Microsoft Pnvacy Statement Legal Send us feedback http //by 129w bay 129 mail live com/mail/ReadMessageLight aspx~A 1 of 1 8/22/2007 2 03 PM Windows Live Hotmail ~. Windows Llve" Hotmail Inbox Junk Drafts Sent Deleted Manage folders New Reply Move to RE• Johnston From Gwyn & ]gym Frost (matticefrost@hotmail coin) Sent Wed 8/22/07 2 54 PM To Jennifer@mtegntidev coin Today Mail Contacts Calendar lofl Jennifer, I'll probably need to get out of the loop on this one Although the Johnston descendants certainly have the legal nght to do as they please, I think that they have tarnished the Johnston, Pearson, and Clark legacies both morally and ethically I have two of the Frost Brothers store ledgers, and I will do what I can to prevent my children from ever selling them to the highest bidders Options , The Johnston items on ebay are item #120153196110, and the bidding closes Sunday, 8/26/07 at 17 05 22 PDT I'll relay all of this to the Etiwanda Historical Society in a few hours The Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission will be in Etiwanda this afternoon If possible, I would appreciate a response to the Hickcox collection question, and whether my photos are still in the family Thanks Jennifer, Jim >From "Jennifer J Dorgan" <Jennifer@integntidev com> >To "'Gwyn & Jim Frost"' <matticefrost@hotmail com> >CC <J anicic@worldnet att net> >SubJect RE Johnston >Date Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08 31 39 -0700 >]im, >I am so happy that you are on top of this and am dismayed that we were not >better in the loop on these items associated with were mistakenly included >in the estate sale I will follow-up on all these items as soon as my mom >returns from her vacation (Monday) Please let us know if we can help in >any way with the ebay bid I will be contacting the estate sale brokers >today to see if there is the possibility of retracting the bid Do you >know >when the bid period expires? >Best, Jennifer >Jennifer J Dorgan >Integriti Development Services >Jennifer@mtegntidev coin >(909)261-7575 http //byl29w bay129 mail hve com/maiUReadMessageLight aspx~A Gwyn Frost qty ~ Jgwyn@hotmail coin Sign out Reply all Forward ., Delete Junk 7200 PM AUG-21-2007 14 36 CROSS STATE ELECTRIC 951 737 9419 P 01/02 8/l 5/Q8 To: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission k'ro~n: Concerned and Affected Froperty owners and Tax payers ~~ ~i.l,~Ail/at~114~~Q ~~CEI~'~,~~ p~,~~~~~411d~ ~u,~„ b,,~~ect:, Public hearing on anon-construction conditional use perm.xt for the X.ife Way Church expansion of Kindergarten through Grade 12, including temporary classroom modules, gymnasium and a fellowship hall. Traffic and Parking: First of all, the last thirtg we need in the surrounding area is more traffic VVe can't even deal with the existing high school overflow and current lack of adequate parking provided by the high school. Vineyard Avenue is full from school students parking. Then, following school, traffic from sports and other activities flood the streets. 'l~here is a two hour parking limit oia Ironwood, Agate, and Alder, This means nothing to students, to people attending sports, music concerts, picnics, parties etc. Feople even park in front of fire hydrants, Zf and when we call the police department, we are told it's not a priority and "when we have tiitte we will come by and check" These violations occur in spite of signs clearly stating the two-hour limit Even on regular school days, this area is not patrolled on a regular bask during school hours. Gii school days, evenings and weekends, the parking extends now over the top of Ironwood and down the other side of Alder At times, mail delivery is hindered or prevented due to mailboxes being blocked by vehicles parked in the way. ~fi~ AUG-21-2007 14 36 CROSS STATE ELECTRIC 951 737 9419 P 02/02 proximi and Number of Scltoois V~Je do not need another school this close to our homes; we already have enough issues (as noted above} with existing schools such as Alta Loma High School This neighborhood does not need an additional school consisting of day caxe and kindergarten through 12th grade Thts would involve adding on more classrooms than are already there, plus a gymnasium and Fellowship hall We also don't need the additional parking problems this would create on all of our surrounding streets. CuiTently, when there are sports and music activittes going an, the church is the first to go out and put up tow-away and no parking sighs They have limited parking in their lot. Once they consume more of the parking lot with additional buildings, where are they goiutg to parr,? How many parlung spaces are they required to have far the size of the church If the church has day care through high school, what impact will this have an the txafflc on 'Vineyard in the ix~oi~nings and later, in the afternoons when the high schoal gets out? Who will direct traffic as children are dropped off and picked ups As noted, weekends, concerts and sports nights are already bad enough for street parking problems. I, TI-TB UNDERSIGNED, AM A X~OME OWNER. WHO TS AGAINST ANY EXI~ANSION OF ANY KIND (INCLUAINCr A SCHOOL) OF TI-~E LIFEWAY CHURC1iI BEC.A.USE OF THE REASONS OUTI,,INED ABOVE. HOME OWNER. s~i~r~-~ ~~~ r ~ ~""~-'`~ ADDR.)~sS• ~O Y ~ G-v G ~~~'c-~ _ _ c_v~ra~,~.G,~~ TOTiaL P 02 btf/~~/~171~ ( lb bb SI,HI,[I•IU ~ y4 f (~ti4 q 8 South Coast ~''~ a~ Air uali Mang enn~nt District Q. tY ~ 21865 Copley Drive, biamond Bar, CA 917GS-4178 ` a ` "~ (909) 396-2000 • www a and ov PACED AYJGY7ST 22~ 2007 Mr Michael Diaz, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dnve Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 NU ti4 ( 1~40b1 ~i ~~~~~~~"~~~~I~G~ Draft lYLtiQated Negative Declaration for the Proposed bevelop~aae~at Review DRC2006- 00592 - 24,880 Sauare Foot Fire District )E~eadauarters 10unldina do 0 93-acre The South Coast Alr Quality Management District (SCAQMD) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above-mentioned document Based on the SCAQMD staff s review of the proposed project, the analysis should be revised and the document should be recirculated for public review Should quantification of irripacts result ~n emissions that exceed the SCAQMD's recoixiixiended our quality sigrii~icance thresholds, an environmental impact report is warranted The SCAQMD would be happy to work with the Lead Agency to address these issues and any other questions that may apse Please contact Gordon Mize, Air Quality Specialist -CEQA Sectiori, at (909) 396-3302, if you have any questions regarding these comments Attachment SS:GNI SBC070815-11 Control Number Siricerely, .s, Steve Smith, Ph. D Program Supervisor, CEQA Section Platziaing, Rule Development & Area Sources G ~.~ a`F eft C• post-~'° Fax Note 7673 fi 08!222007 16 06 SCRQMD ~ 94772847 NO 847 D002 Mr Michael Dla~, Senior Planner August 22, 2007 Lead Agency Aoes Not Estimate Construction/4nerational EAaiss~oas The SCAQMD has repeatedly advised the lead agency that the general plan analysis using URBEMIS7G is woefully out of date because the model relies on EMFAC7G on-road mobile source entission factors, which have since been updated several tunes Relying on a model using EMFAC7G emission factors substantially underestimates mobile source emissions Further, U1tBEMIS7G relies on trip generation rates from a version of the ITE Trip Generation Manual that has been obsolete for a number of years The URBEMIS model continues to be updated to reflect the most current on- and aff--road emission factors, trip generation rates, and metbodolagies available The most current version of the model, URBEMIS2007 version 9 2, was released in early June 2007 and is available to lead agezicie s to assist them v~nth calculating project-specific impacts for projects in their~urisdiction Alternatively, the lead agency can calculate air quality unpacts using the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook, as lozig as the most current emission factors are used Some of the advantages of using the URBEMIS2007 model, in addition to the fact that it relies on the most eun-ent on- and off-road emission factors, are that it also calculates PM2.5 ezriissions (see continent #2) and COZ emissions. C02 is a greenhouse gas The Iead agency should be aware that the Attorney General has indicated that an EIR or MND must analyze greenhouse gas enrussions Foi• this reason and based on the passage of AB32 and recent litigation over CEQA documents, the SCAQMD is advising lead agencies to quantify greenhouse gas emissions_ Because the lead agency has not quantified project-specific air quality impacts from the proposed project, it has not demonstrated that the proposed project will not generate significant adverse construction or operational air quality impacts that may tugger further analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act The lead agency can download the current UItBEMZS 2007 land use emissions model at http•//www urbomis coin or, as previously mentioned, follow the calculation methodolo~es in Chapter 9 and the Appendix to Chapter 9 in the South Coast AQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook, as lozig as the most current emission factors are used PM2.5 Significance Thresholds 2 In response to adoption of PM2 5 ambient air quality standards by U S EPA acid CARB, SCAQMD staff has developed a methodology for calculating PM2 5 emissions when preparing air quality analyses for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Natiozial Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents To determine if PM2 5 au quality impacts are significant, SCAQMD staffhas also developed recommended regional and localized significance thres~aolds When preparing the air quality analysis for the proposed proleet, it is recommended that the lead agency perform a PM2 5 si~iificance analysis by following the guidance fouzid at h //www a and Gov/ce a/handbooklPM2 5/PM2 5 html Further, SCAQMD stafl'has compiled mitigation measures to be unplemented if the PM2 5 impacts or other pollutant au quality impacts are determined to be significant Mitigation 08.,%22/2007 16 06 SCAQMD -~ 94772847 lVlr Michas! Dtaz, 2 Au;ust 22, 2007 Senior Planner measure suggestions can be found at h -//www and ov/ce a/handbooWm~t~ ation/MM intro.html CO Hotshots Ana~sis NO 847 D003 3_ In the Transportation/Traffic Section 15 a through 15 g, the lead agency discusses transportation Impacts but does not disclose potential project traffic impacts for intersections potentially affected by the proposed project. The lead agency concludes, "The proposed project is consistent with the Creneral Plari for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated" and that the proposed project "will not create a substantial increase in the numbei- ofvehicle bnps, traffic volume, or congestion in nearby intersections" but does not provide even a summary of a current traffiic study to support that finduig For the purposes of evaluating the proposed project's traffic impacts for CO hotspots analysis, the lead agency should at nunuiium include the following in the final CEQA document to demonstrate that the potential for CO hotspots is less than significant The lead agency should identify the intersection(s) that would be affected by the proposed protect; quantify the level of service and volume to capacity effects of the proposed project Quantifying existing traffic volumes, the proposed traffic impacts and the unpacts from any proposed mitigation measures are iiriportant because the results ixiay warrant performing a CO hotspots analysis The SCAQMD recommends that a CO hotspots analysis should be performed for any intersection where the LOS declines from C to D or for any intersection rated D or worse where the project increases the volume to capacity ratio by two percent or more Should the lead agency, after estunating the proposed project's traffic unpacts, believe that a CO hotspots analysis is warranted, please refer to the most current Cal Trans guidazice regarding performing a CO hotspots analysis This information can be obtained at the following internet address: httn 1/www dot ca og vlhq/env/air/coprotlhtm O erational Mini Lion Measures 4 The SCAQMD recommends that the lead agency modify mitigation measure #10 on page 7 in Part )~ of the Initial Study in order to comply with state law • All indusmal and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be idling for prolonged periods (i e , in excess of X95 minutes)_ Neighborhood Memo Date: 8/21 /2007 To: Planning Dept ,City of Rancho Cucamonga, Chairman Stewarat and the Planning Commission, 10500 Civic Center DR Ranch Cucamonga , CA , 91730 Cc: Barbara Rich, Planning Commision Meeating From: Anthony Buccheri 7574 Zircon Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 909-987-4287 RE: Public Meeting: Planning Commission, Ref. Life Way Chuch, 7475 vineyard Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Sir From the information I have received from Mrs Rich it has been brought to my attention that the Life Way Church is planning to build several more structures on their hill side site It is apparent that if these structures are not designed correctly, they will destroy the natural beauty that existed on the hill before the church was built To any resident that lives on the downhill side of the church, it quite apparent that the stark light standards and temporary building are not in the best of taste Being a long term resident (40 years) at the same location, I object to the lack of esathic design that was approved by City of Rancho Cucamonga e~t~ ~~iL It is apparent the church ~s exempt from state guidelines, hopefully they are not a exempt from the disrupting the lives and view of the resident that live near the church I therefore request that consideration be given to the following issues 1 Design and placement of the new structures so as not to destroy the natural line of the hillside 8/21 /2007 1 ~~ ~ Neighborhood Memo 2 The review of the current parking lot fixtures as to their starkness' 3 A traffic study of the area to insure that the flow of the added congestion wdl not disrupt the lives of the current homeowners 4 The removal of the current portable structures as soon as possible 5 The planting of trees to break the harsh Ime of the church structures, AJB 8/21 /2007 2 AUG-21-2007 14.36 CROSS STATE ELECTRIC 951 737 9419 P 01102 8/ 15/08 To: The City of Rancho Cucamonga -- ~ P~ CITY OF Planning Commission RANCBiQ CUCq~pNGA k'rom: Concerned and Affected '~~~ ~ ~ 200 Property owners and Tax payers RECE[VEQ PLANrd!NC Su„ beet: Public hearing on anon-construction conditional use permit for the Life Way Church expansion of Kindergarten through Grade 12, including temporary classroom modules, gymnasium and a fellowship hall. Traffic and Parking: First of all, the last thing we need in the surrounding area is more traffic. We can't even deal with the existing high school overflow and current lack of adequate parking provided by the high school. Vineyard Avenue is full from school students parlung. Then, following school, traffic from sports and other activtties flood the streets. 'l,here is a two hour parking limit on Ironwood, Agate, and Alder, This means nothing to students, to people attending sports, music concerts, picnlcs, parties etc. People even park in front of fire hydrants. If and when we call the police department, we are told it's not a priority and "when we have time we wi 11 come by and check " These violations occur in spite of signs clearly stating the twahour limit Even on regular school days, this area is not patrolled on a regular basis during school.hours. On school days, evenings and weekends, the parking extends now over the top of Ironwood and down the other side of Aldei . At times, mail delivery is hindered or prevented due to mailboxes being blocked by vehicles paxked to the way, ~~tL AUG-21-2007 14'36 CROSS STATE ELECTRIC 951 737 9419 P 02102 Proximi and Number of Schools We do not need another school this close to our homes; we already have enough issues (as noted above} with existing schools such as Alta Loma High School. This neighborhood does not need an additional school consisting of day care and ktndergarten through 12th grade. This would involve adding on more classrooms than are already there, plus a gymnasium and fellowship hall. We also don't need the additional parking problems this would create on all of our surrounding streets. CuzTently, when there are sports and music activittes going an, the church is the first to go out and put up taw-away and no parking signs. They have limited parking in their lot. Once they consume mare of the parking lot with additional buildings, where are they goi~xtg, to park? How many parking spaces are they required to have for the size of the church If the church has day care through high school, what impact will this have an the traffic on Vineyard in ftxe znot'tiings and later, in the afternoons when the high school gets out? Who will direct traffic as children are dropped off and picked ups As noted, weekends, concerts and sports nights are already bad enough for street parking problems. I, THE UNDERSIGI~TED, AM A HOME OWNER WHO TS AGAINST ANY EXPANSION OF ANX KIND (INCLUDINGr A SCT:-~OQL} QF THE LIFEWAY CHURCH BECAUSE OF THE REASONS OUTi~INEU A$OVE. HOME QWNER• s,,, ~,~~-..~,~~~`~`~~i-'~'f ADDRESS: ~O ~ 3' C•C./ G aO~~C~~ ~-y~~-r*~.~.ra5' TOTAL P 02 AuQ-10-Or' O6 40am From- 8/15/(''r To: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission From: Concerned and affected Property ov-mers and "Tax payers T-696 P O1/OT F-895 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUG 2 ~ 20~~ RECEIVED -PLANNING Su.~ b.l~ctt Public hearing on anon-construction conditional use permit fox the Life `Vijay Church expansion o£ Kindergarten thxough Cxrade 12, including temporary classraora modular, gymnasium: and a fellowship hail. ;~'raff c and Parking First of all, the last thing we need in the surrounding area is more traff;c. ~Ve can't even deal with the existing high school averFlow a>rrd cuxrent lack of adequate parking provided by the high school. trams dram sports and om school students parking. Then, foliawu~.g scha , other activities Mood the streets. 'There is a two hour parking limit an Ironwood, ,Agate, az~d Alder. 'T'his means nothing to students, to people attending sports, music concerts, picnics, parties etc. Feople even park in front of fire hydrants. If and when we call the police departtxrent, we are told it's not a priority and "when we have time we will come by and check.°' "these violations occur im spite of signs clearly stating the two-hour limit. Even on regular schaol days, this axes is not patrolled on a regular basis during school hours. Qn school days, evenings and weekends, the parking extends raw ovex the top of Ironwood and down the other side of Alder. At times, mail delivery is hindered or prevented due to mailboxes being blocked by vehicles parked in the way- W ith regard to the issue of parking in front of the fu'e hydrants, we have called the Cxty's engineering department requesting that the curbs be paintecl 1tElJ. When we spoke to someone from the Engineering Ueparm~ent, we were told that the CITY doesn't like to see the curbs painted red because it'~~ an eyesore! In this case, do esthetics tzump safsry? Aua-20-07 O6 41 am From- T-696 P 02/07 F-695 Nome We get a considerable aurount of noise fxom contexts, parties, and sports activities. When home owners who live two and three blocks away car' hear the screaming, loud music and foul language, it's too loud and more than a mere nuisance. Proximi and Number of Schools We da not need another school this claw to our homes; we already have enough issues (as noted above) with existing schools such as Alta x.,oma High School. This neighborhood does not need an additional school consisting of day care and kindergarten through 12~' grade. This would involve adding on more classrooms than are already there, plus a gymnasium and fellowship hall. W'e also don't need the additional parking problems this would create on all of our surrounding streets. Currently, when there are sports axrd music activities going on, the church is the first to go Out and put up tow-$way and no parlGing signs. 'They have bruited parking in their lot. Once they consume moxe of the parking lot with additional buildings, whexe are they going to park? ~iovc+ many parking spaces are they xequiured to have far the size of the church? If the church has day care through high school, whax impact will this have oYi the traffic on Vineyard in the mornings and later, iri the afteriaoaxis when the high school gets out? Who will direct traffic as children are dropped oFf aaad picked up7 As noted, weekends, contexts and sports nights are already bad enough fox street parking problems. i,iQhtin,,,,g issues: We, the hani.e owners in the surrounding area, do not want any more lights. We currently have enough light pollution from the park and the parking lot from. the new church's parking lot. The proposed expansion would add to this problem of more buildings, more lights and less parking. The park lights are already so bright and stay on so long that no one can enjoy the outdoors in the evenings any more. When we first moved here, we could see the starsr-•-now you can't. Continued .. . Aua-ZO-OT 06.41 am From- T-696 P 03/07 F-895 Homeowner Alert: Let it be known home owners, that the Planning Commission heari~n~~_on__ Au,~ t~,s z~LzO~(7 at 7 o.m. is the only hearing that will be held. There will be no city council naeetxng or any other hearings regardsng this issue. 'This is it---~so da it now and get `er done. I, THE UNDERSIGNED, AM A HOME OWNE1~t WHO IS AGAINST ANY EXPANSION OF ANY KYNND (INCLUDING A, SCHOOL) OT THE LIFEWAY CHt1ItCI~ BECAtTSE OF THE REASONS OUTLINED ABOVE. HOME OWI~TER; ADDRESS: Although it is highly recommended that letters be delivered in person to l OS00 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucalmo>r><ga, CA, 91729, they also xnay be faxed to (909) 477-2847 or mailed to P. O. Box 807, Ytanck~o Cucamonga, CA 91729. Aug-20-OZ 06:42am From- 4 T-696 P 04/07 F-695 Homeowner Aterk: Let it be known home owners, that the Pig Commission heaxing on August 22 2007 at 7 p m is the only hea~~that will be held. There will be no city council meeting ox at~y other hearings regarding this issue. This is it----~so do it now and get `er done. r, THE UND~RSr~NED, AM A Holv1E owiv~R ~avHO Is AGAINST AN'S~ EXPAATSION OF ,ANY" KIND (INCLUDINCr ,A. SCHOOL) OF THE >w,IFE~'AY" CHURCH BECAUSE Ol~ Tl"lE REASONS OUTLINED ABOVE. NOME ADDRESS: Although it is highly recommended that letters be delivered in person to 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729, they also may be Faxed to (909) 477-2847 or mailed to P. Q. Box 807, l~ncho Cucamonga, CA 91729. Aua-20-07 06:42am From- T-696 P 05/OT F-895 Homeowner Alert: Let it be known hoacne owners, that the Plann%n~ Commission hearin~,,on, ,august 22.2007 at 7 p.~x~. is the only hearing that will be held. There will be no city council meeting or any other hearings regarding this issue. This is it~o do it z~aw and get `ez done. x, THE UNDERSIGNED, AM A HOME OWNER WHQ IS AGAINST ANY EXPANSION OF ANY I{IND (INCLUDI~1'G A. SCHOC?L) OF TIC LIFEyV',A.'SC CI~URCH BECAUSE Ol~ TH'E REASONS OUTLINED ABOVE. l'-IO11~E OWNER; ~ ADDRESS: ~~J~. ~~-~Il~~'~-. C~ . G...~Csxr~P(~~-' ~r Although it is highly recanunended that letters be delivered in person to 10500 Civic Center L7rive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729, they also maybe faxed to (909) 477-2847 ox mailed to P. O. Box 807, Rancho Cucatx~onga, CA 91729. Aua-20-O7 06:42am From- T-696 P 06/OT F-695 $O~A,~, ~OW~ I1~t A~f~Yt: Let it be Down home owners, that the Plaiu~ina Commission hearui on A st 22 2007 at 7 .m. is the onl hearin that will be held. 'T'here will be no city council meeting ar any other hearings t~garding this issue. This is it~-~so do it now and get `er done. I, 'T'HE ~LTNDERSIGNED, AM A HOME OV~JNER WHO IS ACxAINST ANY EXPANSION OF AN'Y KIND {INCLUDING A SCHOOL) OF THE LIFEWA'Y CHrJRCH BECAUSE OF '~ REASONS OUTLINED ABOVE. TOME OWNER ADDRESS: Although it is highly recommended that letters be delivered in person to 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729, tbey also may be faxed to (909) 477-2$47 or maned to P• O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729. r Aug-20-07 06:43am From- T-696 P 07/07 F-695 homeowner Alert: Let i# be known homy owners, that the Planning, Commission hear, on Aueus~ 22, 2007 at 7 v.m. is the on1Y ~,eariz~g that will beheld. There will bE no city council meet~g or any other hearings regardir~ thus issue. 'T'his is it-so do it now and get `er done. X, Tl-IE CINDEYtSIGNED, AM A HOME OWNER WHO lS A~GrAINST AN'Y EXPANSION OF ANY KYND (IN'CLL~ING A SCHOOL) OF THE LIFEWA'Y' CHURCI-l BE'CAU'SE 4ii' Tl[~E REASONS OLT~'x,INED ABOVE. I~O1VfE OWNER: ADDRESS: Although it is high]y recommended that letters be delivered in person to 1 OS00 Civic Center Drive, rancho Cucamonga., CA 91729, they also may be faxed to (909) 477-2847 or mailed to P. O. Box $07, Rancho Cucamonga., CA 91729. Cil'Y OE RAIJCHO CUCAfi~O1~GA 8/ 15/~ ')cm; The City of 1~ancho Cucamonga Planning Conaznission Fa~onc-; Concerned and Affected Froperiy owners and ~'ax payers AU G ~ _ ~ 2007 RECEIVED - PLAf~P~ING Subject: Public hearing on a non-constxuct~on conditional use permit far the l;.ife ~Vay Church expansion of Kindergarten through Grade 12, including t~:noporary classroom modules, gymnasium and a fellowship hall. 7~raffac and Parkin l~ixst of a11, the last thing we need in the surroundir.~ area is more traffic. We c-an't even deal with the existiung high school overfl;aw and currextt lack of ~ldEquate parking pxovided by the high school. Vineyard Avenue is full front <,~chooi students parking. 'k hen, Following school, traffic fro~rn sports ax-d ether activtties flood the streets. '1Chere is a two hour parking limit on ironwood, Agate, and Alder. This rneaxts nothing to students, tv people attending sports, music conceits, ~~icnics, paxttes etc. People even park in fxont of fire hydrants. if aztd when we call the po3ice departtxtent, we are told it's not a priority and "when we 'have time we will come by and check." These violations occux in spite of signs clearly stating the two-hour limit. Even on regular school days, this axes is xtot patrolled on a regular basis during school hours. On school days, eveniwgs and weekends, the parking extends now over the top of Ironwood and down the other side of Alder. ,~Lt times, mail delivery is hindered ox prevented due to mailboxes being blocked by vehicles parked in the way. With regard to the issue of parking in front ofthe fire hydrants, we have called the City's engineering department requesting that the curbs be painted R1ED. When we spoke to someone from the Eaagineexing ]department, we were told that the CITY doesn't like to see the curbs paixtted red because it's an eyesores In this case, do esthetics txtunp safety`? Ol6-d EO/l0 d 201-1 -woad wegl ll 10-OZ-~nV Noise We get a considerable amount of noise fronn concerts, parties, and sports activities. VVb~en Name owners who live two and tlu ee blocks away can hear the screaming, loud music and foul language, it's too laud and more than a mere nuisance. ]P~~raximr and Number of Scl-aols ate do not need another school this close to our homes; we already have enough issues (as noted above) with existing schools such as Alta lw.ama Nigh School. This neighborhood does not need an additional school coztsisting ol'day care a~~d kindergarten through 12~` grade. This would involve adding on more cJ assrooms than are already there, plus a gymnasium and fellowship hall. ale also don't need the additional parking problems this would create on all o E our surrounding streets. Currently, when there are sports and music activities goiut'tg on, the church is the first to go out and put up tow-away and no parking signs. 'They have limited parking in their lot. Once they consume .snore of the parking lot with additional buildings, where are they going to pazk~ How many parking spaces are they required to have for the size of the church I9"the church has day care thxaugh high school, what impact will this have an the traffic on Vineyard in the mornings and later, in the afternoons when the high, school gets out? VVho wi11 direct traffic as children are dropped o~Tand picked up? ,P~s noted, weekends, concerts axtd sports nights are already bad enough for street parking problems. I~i~htine issues: VVe, the home owners in the surrounding area, do not want any more lights. tiVe currently have enough light pollution from the park and the perking lot from the new church's parking lot. The proposed expansion would add to this problem of more buildings, more lights and less parking. The park lights are already so bright and stay on so long that no one cart enjoy the outdoors in the evenings any more. When we first moved here, we could see the stars----now you can't. Continued.. . Ol6-: EO/ZO d Z01-1 -woad wegl'll 10-OZ-~nV k~.o eow er Ale ,,;, Let it be known home owners, that the Plan~aing Cornu~ission_bearin~on August 22, 2007 at 7 p.m. is the only hearing that will be held. There will be no city council tueetintg or any other hearings regarding this issue. Thus is it--~o do it now and get `ex done. I, TkIE UNDERSIGNED, AM .A. HOME OWNER WH0 IS AGAINST ANY E~'ANSIUN OF ANY KIND (INCLUDING A SCHOOL) pF THE LIFEWAY CHURCH BLCAU'SE OE THE REASONS OUTLINEb ABOVE. HOME OWNER: ADDRESS: Although it is highly recotx~mended that letters be delivered in person to ZOS00 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729, they also may be faxed to (909) 47'~-2847 or mailed fiao P. a. Box $07, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729. Ol6-d £0/£0 d ZOl-1 -woad we9l'll 10-OZ^~nV