Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007/02/28 - Agenda Packet THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA GuRcAMO GA FEBRUARY 28, 2007 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Fletcher • Macias _ McPhail _ Munoz II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Workshop Minutes of December 5, 2006 Regular Meeting Minutes of January 24, 2007 II IV. CONSENT CALENDAR II The following Consent Calendaritems are expected to be routine and non-controversial They will be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion A GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE REVIEW - INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL COMPOST FACILITY - A request to quitclaim a Storm Drain Easement at the Inland Empire Regional Compost Facility, located at 12645 Sixth Street, being replaced by a Storm Drain Easement with an alignment avoiding new structures APN 229-283-61 Related file DRC2003-00097 • 1 of 5 - PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FEBRUARY 28, 2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA B SUMMARY VACATION OF HYSSOP DRIVE NORTH OF ITS CUL-DE- SAC TERMINUS, NORTH OF SIXTH STREET (V-206) - A request to find the summary vacation of Hyssop Drive, generally located 680 feet to 1,000 feet north of Sixth Street, m conformance with the General Plan -APN 229-271-29, 35, and 43 C. SUMMARY VACATION OF EIGHTH STREET, SOUTH OF THE A T & S F RAILROAD AND EAST OF THE I-15 FREEWAY (V-207) - A request to find the summary vacation of Eighth Street, generally located adjacent to and East of the I-15 Freeway about 220 plus feet, in conformance with the General Plan -APN 229-271-29, 35, and 43 Related file DRC2005-00683 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking D ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP A request to subdivide a parcel of 2 99 acres into 4 parcels in the Very Low Residential District ( 1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), with Equestrian Overlay District, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN 0201-182-28 Related file Variance DRC2005-00443 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration E VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP A request to reduce the minimum lot depth standard to less than 200 feet in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, approximately 600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN 0201-182-28, Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343 F MODIFICATION OF NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00256 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES (on behalf of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc) - A request to modify an approved Conditional Use Permit by adding entertainment consisting of karaoke, a solo singer, small band, and disk hockey performances for an EI Torito restaurant of about 7,200 square feet in the Regional Related Commercial • • 2of5 • :7 • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FEBRUARY 28, 2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and I-15 Freeway -APN 0229-021-58 Related Files Entertainment Permit DRC2006-00816, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17077, Preliminary Review DRC2005-00020 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities G ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2006-00816 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES (on behalf of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc) - A request to provide entertainment consisting of karaoke, a solo singer, small band, and disk hockey performances for an EI Torito restaurant of about 7,200 square feet (pending construction) in the Regional Related Commercial District, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and I-15 Freeway -APN. 0229-021-58. Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00256, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17077, and Preliminary Review DRC2005-00020 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities H. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00327 - BONNEY ARCHITECTS - A proposed master plan for the phased expansion of an existing church to include a 8,287 square foot fellowship hall, a 5,285 square foot sanctuary, and demolition of an existing fellowship hall on 1 52 acres of land m the Medium Residential district, located at 8619 Baker Avenue -APN 0207- 132-53 Related File Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00328 This item action is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, In-fill Development CONTINUANCE REQUESTED VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS I PROGRESS REPORT ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-45 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-03 -MARGARITA BEACH J ORAL REPORT ON THE REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT 3of5 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA FEBRUARY 28, 2007 RANCHO CUCAMONGA VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS Th-s is the t-me and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time /f items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the COmmISS/On 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 22, 2007, at least 72 hours poor to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga ~ .~ If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate m this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750 Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After • • • 4 of 5 • • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO FEBRUARY 28, 2007 C,UCAMONGA speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planrnng Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission deasion may appeal the Commission's deasion to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,747 for maps and $1,842 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Councl) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us 5of5 VICINITY MAP ~ Planning Commission February 28, 2007 F, G q ~ Meeting Location. N City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive • STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEP_-1RT_IIENT Date: February 28, 2007 To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer By: Cam Amos, Assistant Engineer ,, ,~ r\ 1 ~~,, RANCHO C,UCAMONGA Subject: A request to quitclaim a Storm Drain Easement at the Inland Empire Regional Compost Facility, located at 12645 Sixth Street, being replaced by a Storm Drain Easement with an alignment avoiding new structures APN 229-283-61 Related File ~ DRC2003- 00097 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Project DRC2003-00097, a Conditional Use Permit for conversion of a warehouse to a compost production plant, located at 12645 Sixth Street, west of Etiwanda Avenue in the Heavy Industrial District (Subarea 15), was approved by the Planning Commission on July 23, 2003 The owner is the Inland Empire Regional Compost Authority • The property had an approximately 5 foot diameter public storm drain, in a 15 foot wide public storm drain easement entering the front of the property and running diagonally across it for several hundred feet. The existing 410,000 square foot warehouse on the 24 acre property is being augmented by approximately 40,000 square feet of additional building floor space plus 3 acres of existing parking lot is undergoing construction as a biofilter, a mechanical air cleaning facility The additional structures would interfere with maintenance of the storm drain so a new one is replacing it, with an acceptable realignment The owner has granted the City' an easement for the new alignment and the former storm drain has been removed from the easement to be quitclaimed Elimination of the old storm drain easement is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding, through minute action, that the easement quitclaim is in conformance with the General Plan This finding will be forwarded to the City Counal for further process and final approval Respectfully submitted, Dan James Senior Civil Engineer DJ CA dlw • Attachments Exhibit A -Proposed Quitclaim Exhibit B - Proposed Quitclaim Sketch Item A • -,~,,~, - ---- ,r ~--I , i~ ~ i ' }y1~1 f The/ I ~ i~icenter-~----.-..--_-- '' s Arfuv~~Nv.y~ Anowr^,cute T' Jersey El,~d ~ Y~/ -~>'etrrson r'~,r~eJrau" 5,enr,~ ~n ,r~ ~,~~ ~f-~-~; :~ _~F th 'mo't ~ v ( I ^a ~ t~tanno St '' t 1~ ~ ~ 5, St~ f~1{ss{ori PaArlAr ~ I leiiss.i(cn'J~sta ~r I~,' { Cr 4tFi' St ~~, ~1,1 ~~ ~ Ji~ ~~ 5 ~ a. J m I 1 I' ~ -- a . ~ ~ Q ~° { v a. t ~~ ii ~~J i~'~ ~ r ~ Cr ~ I '° o't~~u~e~ j ~~U fA_, `^ `+ _ ~~ (~`' ~ ~ F,.~~, ~~., `.~- CITY OF RAi~CHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION I S ., V (, ~, drrtana a -- '~ -r bills ~ii~ 1' ~'~ _ D 5 km._~., {~{ IFoo~zy ;©2449 Rand MchaeSy 3 Co~racry N A1rTEQ A-2 ~,~, _ uwen St _ Lekua`!an { ^I ~d Sevilfe,4~ ~ 7 ~--- ---~ _ ~' ° e ~L -? ~_____r__--__ - o - 1I ~ ~ v, m a I I ~I i I d { u~a,.µ.-..., r,.. , Wapa 3t ~ -._.- - -.. {rf Cal{fom{a Speedway 72645-f~th St -, ."~ - ~~ ~ __^ ~_, y Y ~~San Bernard{rro ~+,V l ~ .: ~ W v E E v=ncv 61vd k`-~.~i~ • NORTH I I I "_• ITEM TITLE f~~C11V l7"}~ N]~{p EXI-IIB IT • EXHIBIT "A" QUITCLAIM EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO 7951 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 87, PAGES 11 THROUGH 13, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY INCLUDED WITHIN A STRIP OF LAND 15 00 FEET WIDE, AN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES, DESCRIBED AS STRIP "B" IN A DEED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECORDED DECEMBER 7, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT NO 84-292832 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY CONTAINING 11,048 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS ~ ~ C ~,% ROBERT B STANFORD JR , LS 4457 DATE DECEMBER 06,2006 REGISTRATION EXPIRES 9/30/2007 • ~cJ~~S~ lf+~lD SU~~~{- ~"f~d~tht~3, J6~• ~ Exp. Ss~t 30, 2007 ~' A!o 457 ~ ,l~ ~~~ ~~~~, "'~.Tc~ pF C ALIT ~~` • LD-HZ -051-QC-REV1 J N 11-0256-01 DECEMBER 06, 2006 A-3 ~- ~ 6TH STREET FORMERLY 7TH ST. N89'S6'37"E • ~ _~-- ~ N89'56'37"E - 625 49' ~ ) --~ ~ E 1 N00'03'23"W N N N I ~ ~ I~z~ cn w ~ I~wz cn c~ w z ~za, NQ~ Ilwoc~n w \ ~- z w Q w z ,,, ~, .~~:'~ „ , ,, ';s''~'' ~,,r;~,' , ,,~ ~~:;, ~~ ~,r• , '~,r~', 0 0 ,II W J Q /~ NORTHERLY LINE, PARC L f EXISTING 4' WIDE EASEMENT FOR STREET, 15 00' HIGHWAY AND RELATED PURPOSES PER INSTRUMENT NO 92-474942 / j ~ aa/ N O ~ n nn/V !~~ ~ II II II II `~ STRIP "B" INST #84-292832 ~s~ ~ ~ = 21'55'50" `'~ ~ R = 45 00' /~ .' ~h //~~~ i~/~~ ~o`~ ~~ ~~' ,- J w I- w ~ SAND .~~~ ~~L C~ R B R TI ~ ~ ~ - ST NF FvD JR G J EYP SET 30,2007 'a ~r ~10 4457 ~ --EXISTING 15' STORM DRAIN EASEMENT STRIP "A" INST #84-292832 SOUTI-IERLY LINE, PARCEL 1 N89'S6'37"E Hu«r-zo~~.~s 1101 S ~~lilliken Avenue £~ulte G r~ntarlo,CA 91761 909/390-8400 '909/390-8406 FAX L = 17 22 T = 8 72' EXHIBIT "B" scA~E 1" _ goo DRAVM ©~ LWF • SKETCH SHOWING QUITCLAIM OF STRIP "B" DATE o1-03-2005 INSTRUMENT #84-292832 Joe No 11-056-01 SPept 25, 2G05 10 .'.5 FI \PROJ\710256G1 ~~LE~H02 D'NG STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: February 28, 2007 RANCHO C;UCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer By: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer Subject: SUMMARY VACATION OF HYSSOP DRIVE NORTH OF ITS CUL-DE-SAC TERMINUS, NORTH OF SIXTH STREET (V-206) - A request to find the summary vacation of Hyssop Drive, generally located 680 feet to 1,000 feet north of Sixth Street, in conformance with the General Plan - APN 229-271-29, 35, 43. Related file: DRC2005-00683 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS William Fox Group, Inc ,has processed and is progressing with the work for DRC2005-00683, the construction of a warehouse building of about 104,000 square feet on a parcel of 6.72 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District, Subarea 14, located at the terminus of Hyssop Drive. William Fox Group Inc. has requested the vacation of Hyssop Dnve within their site boundary. The current site boundary is the result of a lot merger which combined several lots into one. There are no other parcels of land which require access to that portion of Hyssop Drive being vacated. A Secondary emergency access to the William Fox Group site and approved by the Fire District, is already established through an easement across an adjacent site. Utility companies, other agencies and various City divisions have been notified of the proposed vacation and were asked to comment. There were no objections to the proposed vacation from any of these groups. The vacation is consistent with the goals and objectives of the circulation element of the General Plan. Hyssop Dnve north of the cul-de-sac terminus (north of 6th Street) is not required as "community travel routes" of the General Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding through minute action that the proposed summary vacation conforms to the City's General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. Respectfully submitted, ~~ ~~ Dan James c.~ • Senior Civil Engineer DJ MNB alv Attachments Vicinity Map (Exhibit "A") V-206 Vacation (Exhibit "B") Access Easement (Exhibit "C") Item B Vicinit Illla N. T.S. " _ . I_ n~ , ~I~JS ~ I T~ 'F'uo7lr{lt~L ~.~i j 1 ~I _ -: ~ d0 1 - ~"" ~ .rr ~ germ ! I ~ .ra~,`'~J~ f .e ~ ~ ,I y~i« 1J .+f ~'. ~ k ' 4:;.,~t~...,:,t:~....a' '~-`'fi'r ~ "' it t.o~'i°~ 1a', rj ; Ifi''r. 347 ~ ~ '' ~ ~ r iu; " r ~ ? r "_,r~ , i , ~i a'r a $, 3 - i k~*'' ~~ ;' `~ '~ Ix ' Ir<a ~` j`, ~~`''~~ ' ,,"t7 rr ', , _ a , ~ a~ 1ih }~ 14r~ , . a ° ti ~clr, +~~r: ~ ~sfX, "'ti ,°, x}r }5 r,r~ f'ya, ~~ ~ p'4rjr, ~r~4CfQb'd,'~iL31W'~Y~ "a, r,_W_...'~ r ,'as tld~1,,~,,r , ~ l'• ~~ ~'~e9! "lrtr ~'v'h";d ti y~, 'FT~_.,...._....~.p__'" ~,.... 'r~ ''} uau..w ~ 9 ii~.__nti .._ ''m' ` ~ , u~C+-._: "_~. ~~,_,,_. ~,~~~' ~ ~~r='~}Lii ~r~~~ g}~ lu.,. `~ ' • 1' , i [; ~nr ,"!v , ' ~ Tzr~,~i1"~;~^'"~j~i ; i ~' ;IrY =e~,+``~ , n• rv p ~,. ~Sk. ~31DO,~T81C~ ,r` ~ r~..,,'!,'"~)'.~{~ ~",,1~,t~,'+~~' ~ ~, A,~f m/,oa ",;r u,,,,~~&„~r~~,,;ar~,i'r~~I~i'r!`~ ~q'~".~~" ~ _~,...._.,_ _. , , n,`}a 3+= _ r iln l' V t , ``~ _ :. !`I~""'1 _}l. r.~yl f; ~ w r ~ ^L ~, ~ 'i ~d1'i' ~ ,,~' , -, .i ~ ~~~,.r~dl~z,*,^.J r~, i1 f I ~q~~ ,.p ~ ` ~ k(71~i ~ r~r "~~~}" ~ .'y+ ~~ r . »,~W x~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ riC~ i~7t~~ ,,,~' ~y iaJtr ~-°j~ r ' 'D .GI9YNJi w.m.w. ..,,,,...-a-^_,;~~~, ~f .~~ ., , - t,` ~ {' ~4 :i`r -'~~ ~a'•^ rL~,srai . 1~, .i,l ge..j4 9x Ir+ y ~~,a-~+m+`~I~+~e~w.r~d~'~~Y~'~" ~{1,s ~ ,~+~,wx . ~~ h-- ' i~ . n '~~~ - ` d pq. ~ ~ i~ ~'~ Jr', E LYi' t a ~ j ity„ :l, kr~:i>ir~' !s , ,~ r •~ 1 dr' r I r .. era ~.. ''4 fy.'~y4 s 1'_-.3" ir_ ~.'S~=rM w'~ I j.';;~r{ ~If r ~!~ ~~~J~°~.C'~ ~` ..,r41~f LIS' i5'i~.:. -1 tsRr~~~' flb w; r r ' ~ N ~q~ h' 1 rr~,. Y ~ I a ~ ~ K ~r {1.i ~~ rl~~,p~rk;l'~n ~ ~ Jr r, S.~J7 ~-~. ~' 3r su jf a ,J,l~ir,f °5r'1 z r~iyA?~ I~f'ar~ r le `~~ ~~~~~' ~''~•• ,~, `f~i1~ir1 ~ ` ~a~"~. ,~ ~~y'~~y,'a,l,~ >'' o ~ ~ I~fi ~ r ~' 9 +r, , r, + r ~, ^'~„ 7~~,, ~i tiF ~ "frr{+~~'' F . <. ~ a~ _ r '1^-yc-rt' r r r h r pt~,~ ~ 1<4 'Sn r~er' ~Yjj~ } jy,.yy~.,.. !#r~t ?~~{,t~(J T~" 7 ~r I' ~~ i; ~ f' '~ 7~ ~~ pR I ' 1}~ wa ~ f 7 rlP3< I - kV" ~C 1 ia, mE ~ !.: r,my~)~,!b:~i q~~~rt; ~ rr 1 ~I~S.'~y,'y ~-' 5~~ ~ 1 rn'~a r'ttt P r~r"F~r .iii v~N P.r "l~ I 7 ' r ~f ~y ' I J I',+~wf ~,i,7 4,r L Q:~ r<~ -'Y~~~ra' '~hnr~ r ~ ~ ,fir ~ { t ;.~j,,~ .. rrr x~'} ~y~,ar i' p 'W~'^ i ,{„`~ ear' r t` ~ ~' Y to fir; '}~~j; ~'+.I ~: °~'r,~i~~ ,~~a 't uurt"i'5~~~~ Ik. ~ ~~, ^d Y. ,~ fi'I'. er~~ ,gr.r L; e" in V~ 4~ o..«t~,i dt'~i,-~i ji t~rl'ilYl ~.~ ~ -u,.k,:~~aa ~` rv+i ~e.l ~°h ~ Y art rh.,,i~, 2, ~(~ i ? ~6~ ~~~ I r ~i~`"'~"~.kr a°' ~` ~ rfk'tw~ .~.;'i Ydai<fir"~'7~Yad+:,yrr~~`a~'~{~gM+"'r:°l~i?'"f91'rt ir.~rt;r~",rrl, ~I ~'~~,rdP[~''" s ~.i+ I ~' c. ` "' ~ ' ~ ~ Y ,' i(}" f~ry~{*'fit 3°, 2 t fG'~,~'in WY'"k r7 ~~s,ow~.i'' ~'~+,' rl~ t~N'rP f {you' ,,' + IoT„ , r' I ~'~ ~ ~ I n.x ~q ~ 4',~,4~''~r•R Y~ 'r,ih'.;"i}rf, }'1'~~~ ~ r~~uf'~~~ ~Y'hr~/}~~~'~~zr~R7~jkr~ r~ ~~~~,~i. k ,~i ~ "°f Fr~~ '1~ Y ..~.: fir. ~ IITu:., r ie~ h to r'~rSr i}it ~' I,~ 4 1 4 ~'~~~ ~nL~ r~I~L.. E~ t ! ix~^R. ~:;. ~j~' p tr' z, 1., ~ "2b t4ua I 4 fr' ~C '1~~~, h"'i ~ L `~,rrr ~, ' _ u.l ~4y, ` ~ I`^'^.^ I s4}t' ~ o ~(rFiaC•alJ a~}:ifL; `~ y,~~ f :~x4'4W'~~t+e' k•' lx r} !'s~, 7 ~ ' ~Ps~ ,M, 9 ,r;' .a` tc ij ~~ x11 yr ~.~ ~,~' irf rz~st ~'{~,J` 0,p~{ ~-~,rf i4~~~if ~4 y , ~~r'~~J ti t,~. ~i~,~ ;p~. -ia',~r`; '~ Y~ ~' _ 'ra., ~R ~i, ~ ~ +. ix ~47Tt",;'~a~is er~N- aZ~k}(' i ~:~l~t'`~ir~.~r 74M Kwr~.o~f> ~y 'S .5,~' kT I ~I r~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~jJ~ ..~ ~' ~ r ,.t°^,~rr> ,~y rr ~ .,~~` ~_5~ FII~}r ~Mi ro, ~~-'~n ~a's'3, m'c ~r; nb'{"~ 'qtr ~':i ~ ~ _ ~ p ~ r'u~! ~!'' ~ r ;as '~''{ ra ,,..r.,::.W.....,,.k~.,~.u~.~.~- .,.. ~t 3~"tc . ~ ..~,w~I.y~ 6 } i }~+y r''~/. q ~ i~~ 4'' •f ~'1 r {r ~ ^ l~ ~ ~ , 1~y4 ~7r 3} 4 ~ 5j -~~ C6~ _...,^'`~~d"s I ~a ~~m~lyr Y rwi~~ -° 1!'~rrt,:I'~id: '`i~~l^",rriG i,'~~? rt ~dq+d' _.. - red ~ ~-"'~`' ~ 1 ~ ~ r ~°,~ `~t~ ~ ., `~ Mrl- "xre7 ' I i f~ ~ ~__ -~~'' ~ ~' ~ x ~ _ ' i~~-,~~~"~ '~ i9y ~!~ `~'~ .~ f ~ ~~ 'fit ~i~~ ~ ~ r;~ ~ fro .. eu. , rt ITEM: Hyssop Dr. Vacation (V-206) TITLE: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT "A" City of Rancho Cucamonga • • B-2 • • ~ EXH/B/T /,LJ „ N82 49'08" RAL Portion of Hyssop Drive for Street Vacation (11_206 i c n w h N II v O ~o G~OG~~DOM OG~ L~~~ g~ ~~ g~~0o a h O II d /V84 44'19"W RAD R= 7633. DO P~ 6 R 56 00 5.~~ a= 99 20'16 ~C R=56.00' L= 97.09' -~ T=65.96' ~ _ ,RAC G°~OG°~~~~~I o01~ L~Oo ~ g4 ~'t1 ~ J9~0 LEGEND AREA TO BE VA CA TED AD • No. 31653 = Exp 12/31/2006 ~ C~C~~P OF CAUF~ N0070'S2 E 59.71 ' i P.O.B. S89 49'04 "W °~~o~ 0 °°~~ 4~~~ I I I B-3 Emergency, Maintenance and Vehicle Access to DRC2005-00683 - - ~-- lEGE~ s~ vErat ® EAS7FMENT flEREG1N AREA ~~~(t°l"C~ "~, ° ~6~.1 ~7 ~~ .~ ~J g I~ b "~ ~B~ - - SB754'SB"W 38030' POB NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15, BLOCK 1 OF 7HE TOWfJS~TE ~! OF ROCHESTER ~ a MB 12/29 I ~ SCALE 1'=120" N145556"W p=11 03'09 ° R=209 40~ L=40 39' T=20 26: ti T 9' N0173'00 "W 96 RAD 99' \ SBS 6700"W N0071'47 E -Z6 75' p=272746' R=56 0 ' L=26 B ' 6~®G~~9®R7®IFR.®~3~ T=136 ' AIDS ~I~'® I ~ I I I a b h ~ErAiL `,a NTS ~N0071'47 E 17 26' S89 55'38 E' ` 2511' City of Item: Hyssop Drive Vacation (V-206) Rancho Cucamonga Title: Emergency, Maintenance and ENGINEERING Vehicle Access to DRC2005-00683 DIVISION EXHIBIT: "C" B-4 • • STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Date: February 28, 2007 To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission From: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer By: Mark Brawthen, Contract Engineer RANCHO C;UCAMONGA Subject: SUMMARY VACATION OF EIGHTH STREET, SOUTH OF THE A.T. & S.F. RAILROAD AND EAST OF THE I -15 FREEWAY (V-207) - A request to find the summary vacation of Eighth Street, generally located adjacent to and East of the I- 15 about 220 plus feet, in conformance with the General Plan - APN 229-271-29, 35, 43. Related file: DRC2005-00683 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS William Fox Group, Inc., has processed and is progressing with the work for DRC2005-00683, the construction of a warehouse building of about 104,000 square feet on a parcel of 6.72 acres in the General Industrial (GI) Distract, Subarea 14, located at the north terminus of Hyssop Drive. William Fox Group Inc. has requested the vacation of Eight Street along their northerly site boundary. The site has access from Hyssop Drive. There are no other parcels of land which require access to that portion of Eighth Street being vacated. Eighth Street has been vacated to the east and west of this site by the County prior to Annexation by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A Secondary emergency access to the William Fox Group site and approved by the Fire District, is already established through an easement across an adjacent site to the east. Utility companies, other agencies and various City divisions have been notified of the proposed vacation and were asked to comment. There were no objections to the proposed vacation from any of these groups. The Southern California Edison Company has requested an easement be retained for their facilities in the area of the vacation (Exhibit "C"). The vacation is consistent with the goals and objectives of the circulation element of the General Plan. Eighth Street is not required as "community travel routes" of the General Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the finding through minute action that the proposed summary vacation conforms to the City's General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. Item C CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Ri/ SUMMARY VACATION OP EIGI-ITH STREIJT, SOUTH OI' TH1/ A T & S F RAILROAD AND EAST OF THir I -15 F12EEWAY (V-207) PAGIJ 2 • Respectfully submitted, Dan James Senior Civll Engineer DJ:MNB •tlv Attaclunents: Vlcmlty Map (Exhlbrt "A") V207 (Exhibit "B") SCE Easement (Exhibit "C") Access Easement (Exhibit "D") C7 • C-2 • • Vicinit M~ N. T.S. - •`rn-. ~~ ;i ~I~`~ O ~FOOTNILLf31. -- i~ ~ - `I1~ - `~ - , ~ - ti ~ ~,1 - - _ ~ ~,~ 1 r- I~ i[7 yy,, /y n { ~ ~ ~, ~~ { d' . '.. v " N ~ ~' -ry ' ~'~^","lam' f I~ - ` ~ . 1...D~en.~~`i!~- ., I,- • ; ~ h;th'i.~~~...;~«?a*tn~ ~"!!"""_'~"`"'"E"')-.~v;..~.~i'-r~±•i au~`~w-i-..i-' ~, _ ~~ry' ,4 ~{ ,x ''7 ~ ~ f~~j-~=~" ~ ~~ ,t~~~~ ~l'.~~4,' a.~; i5ir9rn,<< f ^?,1,i3,..4."~ ~Yt.....r=.- 'y~ ~ ~M ui. y v~4~ _..M I J~ d (ildr+~ L~i ,~a,l i \ hA' iGi r.t 'r ~ ~ i~.f=~~ y 4 F~ ~~l ~{ ~' 1'~~~~~ ~~jtj-^' - ;~ ~ +~.~ - -`C'r' . ~'j ~xr ~t 'y,~'a,,~i' ~ ~~~'' ~2~~ ~., - i, ~i~ .i i~ fa~At ~!~ 15 a.r ., iN~f ,*h, TJia~ _ '~ ~'•~, I~ , ~~ _ -- f. +i ~liY '~~t {f(~ ~ ,i ' 1 '_ ~" Y, ~1, -S~` yt ~ .M .,1 ~'F'.r / Y^I, ~}-~__._y.. +'lIIJ~ ~T Q .~~ ~' ~ ~~t-r ,~ ,i ^ r#~. ' ` ~ ~~{,^ ,i ~ ~ ~L~JY +i II~ Y 1 I - 4„ n y~F f ITEM: 8th Street Vacation (V-207) TITLE: Vicinity Map EXHIBIT "A" City of Rancho Cucamonga C-3 EXH/B/T B" _~- A. T. & S. F. RA/LROAD 0 N8754 58'E 210.23' ~''''~ _ ~ _ i ~ c~7~~/ /1~ sng71'47"E •'~ ~ ~. 58"~W 221.81' ~I~I~I~I~I~ S8 54'58 'W 38 .30' NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 15, BLOCK 1, OF THE TOWNSITE OF ROCHESTER MB 12/29 POB ~ I~ I g l ~° I ~~` I ~~ I ~~ I ~a I ~~ ~~°o ~ ~o z~ ~~ ~~~e I v~ ~~ ~~ y~~ ~~ y~o ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ I~ 7 POR77ON OF EIGHT STREET FOR STREET VACATION, V-207 LEGEND, ~o pROFESSIp~~ ~ AREA OF 7HE ROAD EASEMENT TO BE VACATED ~~~~`' c ~(AR~s~i ~~ t~~~8 ~No. 31653 ~ LA/VD DEl/ELOPMEIVT DES/G/V ~iORPORATIO 2 2313 E. Philadelphia St., Ste. F ~, Exp 12/31/2008 Ontario, CA 91761 (909) 930-1466 ,FAX (909) 930-1468 ~~~~~ ~P PLANNING • CIVIL • SURVEYING SCALE., 1 °=100' qjF' pF CA1-~F~~~ DATE: SCALE: SHEET: JOB N0. RDAD SHEET 2 OF 4 10/16/06 1 "=100' 2 OF 4 4178 EASEMENT VACA 710N • r~ C-4 Emergency, Maintenance and Vehicle Access to DRC2005-00683 - - ~-- .. A. T. d: S/ F. RAILROAD f /FI;FNn SEF DETA/L " A" ® EASTEMENr HEREDYV AREA I N'~b'DIV~IL iUN &.2e~1 ~7 o "~O n ~ hW ~_~I D=27 R=56 L=26 ~®G~1~6®6d®!~L®~~4 r=1,3 ~~ ~~ ~i i~ ?1 58754'58"W 38030' POB NORTHEAST CORNER Of COT 15, BLOCK 1 OF 7NE TOWNSITE YD OF ROCHESTER ~ w MB 12/29 I SCALE 1 '=120' RAD ~=13:3256" R=25 19' N0173 00 "W D=11 X3'09" ' L=5 96' RAD T=2 99' R=209 40 L=40 39' 5883700"W ' T=20 26' S 67 54 SB N007147 E ~~u z6 75' N ~ TPOB ~ ~ N0071'47 E p rb~ 1726' SB935'38 E 25 11 ' DETA/L 'A " Nrs City of Item: Hyssop Drive Vacation (V-206) ancho Cucamonga Title: Emergency, Maintenance and ENGINEERING Vehicle Access to DRC2005-00683 DIVISION EXHIBIT: "C" C-5 _ A. T. & S. F._RAILROAD R W AREA OF RESER ~A 77ON AND ~EPTION TO THE VACA 770N OF o E/GHT STREET,• V-207 EIGHT STREET ~,, I I I - N8770'19'E 220.78_ - - FORMERL Y FIRST STREET) PROF ESS/p ~ F,O k9~ POB ,~~~ ~ FARE, F~~ NORTHWEST ~ ~ 5 s i PARCE~ AF SEE DETAIL ~'A " ~( ~\ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ LLA #627 C~ ONO. 31653 ,~ Exp 12/31/2008 TqT CIV11. ~~~P ~ ~ F OF CAL~FO ~~~ 00 ~ ~u ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ o0 _~~_~ G~ ~ ~~ p ~ ~ SCALE.• 1 "=100' ~D ~ooa~ ~ --------- EASEMENT LINE D - EASEMENT CENTERLINE OOD°~` ~ _ EIGHT STREET (FORMERL Y F/RST S7REE ti TPOB N130621'E 5.00' POB NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL A LLA ,¢627 ,TAIL A a f~ AND DE~EL OPMENT DES/GN CORPORA TIOI 2313 E. Philadelphia St., Ste. F G~ Ontario, CA 91761 (909) 930-1466 • FAX (909) 930-1468 PLANNING • CIVIL • SURVEYING SEE EXHIBIT "C" FOR LEGAL DESCRlP77ON ~Q DATE: SCALE. SHEET• JOB N0. EDISON SHEET 4 OF 4 10/3B/06 1 '=100' 4 OF 4 4178 EASEMENT • • C-6 • r~ U ,~~/~' } ~~ _ ,~ T H E C I T Y ~- _ _ ._ ~ . RANCHO C U C A M O Stiff Report O F ,- - -_ -, , „__ _ - s, „ ~, - - ~._- -- -__...axz~w_ . _ _ _ ~..__.. __.~, .__ i N G A DATE: February 28, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP - A request to subdivide a parcel of 2.99 acres into 4 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) within the Equestrian Overlay District, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN. 0201-182-28. Related file: Variance DRC2005-00443. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth standard to less than 200 feet in the Very Low Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) within the Equestrian Overlay District, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, approximately 600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN• 0201-182-28. Related file. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343. • PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences; Very Low (VL) Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) South -Vacant; Very Low (VL) Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) East -Single-Family Residences; Very Low (VL) Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) West -Single-Family Residences; Very Low (VL) Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) B. General Plan Designations• Project Site -Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) North -Very Low (VL) Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) South -Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) East -Very Low (VL) Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) West -Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) Items D & E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17343 AND DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 2 . • ANALYSIS: A Site Charactenstics• The project site is located at the south side of Wilson Avenue, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue, on an L-shaped parcel about 300 feet east-west by about 450 feet north-south. The site is vacant and is generally characterized by a relatively large, overgrown shrub and grasses. All of the surrounding properties are developed with single-family residences with the exception of a parcel to the west, and another to the south, of the project site The subject property and all surrounding properties are within the Very Low Residential District. The existing topography slopes from about 1,815 feet on the north side of the site to about 1,780 feet on the south side. B. Project Description: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the parcel into four parcels. The average lot size will be 23,875 square feet with a minimum lot size of about 20,931 square feet. With the exception of Lot 1, all of the proposed parcels created comply with the City's requirements for lot area, width, and depth that are applicable in the Very Low Residential District Lot 1 is only about 165 feet deep because of the location of the cul-de-sac "bulb" of Tamarind Court and the configuration of the parcel (Exhibit C). Although, the western most part of the lot is over 200 feet deep, it is generally not usable, and, therefore does not meet the intent of the minimum 200-foot lot depth required in this development district. The applicant has submitted Variance DRC2005-00443 for a reduction in lot depth Frontages for Lots 1 and 2 will be on the extension of Tamarind Court while frontages for Lots 3 and 4 will be on the extension of Cabrosa Avenue. At this time, the applicant has not submitted any house designs for review; it is their intent to sell • each lot individually for construction of homes by other developers. However, when submitted for plan check, each home will be subject to the City's design standards and compliance with the applicable development standards will be verified. As this project site is located in the Equestrian Overlay, additional requirements apply including the 70-foot separation between habitable spaces and horsekeeping facilities such as corrals and barns. This required separation significantly limits the plotting of future homes and the applicant has been informed accordingly. C. Variance DRC2004-00443 The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow Lot 1 to have a depth of 165 feet. The required lot depth in the Very Low Residential District is 200 feet. FACTS FOR FINDINGS The purpose of a Variahce is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. Following are facts to support the necessary findings. Finding 1. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result m practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code Facts: The depth of Lot 1 is restricted by the alignment of Tamarind Court and a vacant parcel immediately to the south. Shifting the alignment of the proposed street northward is not possible, as it is an extension of an existing segment entering the site from • D& E-2 J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17343 AND DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 3 Tract 16237 to the east. Note that the design of the cul-de-sac is a modification to the City's standards that was made to allow Lot 1 to be as deep as possible. Utilizing the standard design would have caused Lot 1 to be only about 150 feet deep Finding 2: That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone Facts: The overall project is an "in-fill" project surrounded by properties that were subdivided (or the application to subdivide was submitted) prior to the adoption of the ordinance requiring a minimum lot depth of 200 feet in late 2001. As a result, the lots immediately surrounding the subJect site, except for the two southernmost lots of the tract to the east, are about 160 to 180 feet in depth. Finding 3: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Facts: The applicant would be required to significantly alter the proposed design of the parcel map to comply with this regulation The only alternative that exists would be to eliminate Lot 1 altogether. • Finding 4: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Facts• There are unique site conditions. The project site is surrounded by developed parcels, flexibility on the design of Tamarind Avenue is restricted by technical requirements, and there are no practical alternatives, i.e. the lot depth of Lot 1 cannot be increased by reducing the number of lots or decreasing the size of one of the other lots. Finding 5: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Facts: The project has been designed to take into account the orientation of neighboring lots, the locations of structures on these lots, and the grade differences that exist between the subject property and the adjacent lots. The characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood will be preserved. D. Grading Review Committee: The Grading Review Committee (To and James) reviewed the application on May 2, 2006. As corrections were required, the application was not approved. A revised application incorporating these corrections was resubmitted for the Committee's review on June 6, 2006 The Committee accepted the revised application and recommends approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Technical Review Committee• The application was not accepted as submitted because of • a variety of issues. The most significant of these was the uncertainty regarding the drainage of Lot 1 to a public right-of-way as required by Planning Commission D& E-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17343 AND DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 4 Resolution 92-17 This issue was resolved to the satisfaction of the City Engineer when the applicant obtained a private drainage easement, recorded on December 11, 2006, across the vacant lot (APN 0201-182-34) that is located immediately to the south of Lot 1, that will allow drainage to Northridge Drive The applicant also resolved the other issues, as well The Committee recommends approval, their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. F. Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee (Stewart, McPhail, and Coleman) analyzed the project on May 2, 2006 The application was not accepted as the project did not comply with Section 17.08 030E 2.b of the Development Code that requires a minimum of 70 feet between livable spaces and horsekeeping facilities on adjacent properties In this case the "conflict" was between Lots 2 and 4 (Exhibit E). Initially directed to delete Lot 2, the applicant revised the parcel map's design to show a new location for the horse corral on Lot 4 and resubmitted for review on June 6, 2006 (Exhibit F). The Committee accepted it and recommends approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. • G. Trails Advisory Committee. The Trail Advisory Committee reviewed the project on May 10, 2006. The application was not accepted because, primarily, of the location of the horse corrals on Lots 2 and 3, and the depth of Lot 1 which, at that time, was about 150 feet (Exhibit G). Changes were made to the application incorporating new corral locations and a revised street cul-de-sac design that increased the depth of Lot 1 to about 165 feet was resubmitted for review on June 14, 2006. The Committee accepted it and • recommends approval (Exhibit H). Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. H. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted on April 24, 2006, at Community Baptist Church, located at 9090 19th Street. All property owners within 300 feet of the subject property were notified of the meeting and invited to attend (the meeting occurred prior to the adoption of the ordinance that requires notification of property owners within 660 feet). The primary concerns were loss of views, the size of the proposed homes, and the general design of the parcel map. In response to the loss of views, staff stated that although there is no view protection ordinance, the homes are limited to a maximum height of 35 feet, the maximum allowable height in this development district, per the Development Code. In addition, the proposed finished pad elevations for the northernmost lots (Lots 2 and 3) are between 5 to 10 feet lower than the finished surface elevation of Wilson Avenue. The street is, in turn, about an additional 10 feet lower than the finished pad elevations of the existing homes on its north side In response to the architectural quality of the proposed homes, the applicant indicated that, although not part of the project at this time, the homes would be typical of the neighboring two-story homes located to the east of the project site (Tract 16237). Staff reinforced this by stating that the homes would be subject to review by the City for consistency with the City's design and development standards. The attendants of the meeting were supportive of the project. I. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the • potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained m that D& E-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM17343 AND DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 • Page 5 Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, air quality, water quality, hydrology, and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and all property owners within 660 feet of the project site were notified. No comments have been received in regards to this project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343 and Variance DRC2004-00443 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Jam s R. Troyer, AICP • Planning Director J RT: MS\ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Vicinity Map Exhibit B -Aerial Photo Exhibit C -Tentative Parcel Map No. 17343 Exhibit D -Grading and Cross-Sections Exhibit E -Design Review Committee Action Comments dated May 2, 2006 Exhibit F -Design Review Committee Action Comments dated June 6, 2006 Exhibit G -Trails Advisory Committee Minutes dated May 10, 2006 Exhibit H -Trails Advisory Committee Minutes dated June 14, 2006 Exhibit I -Excerpt of the Development Code, Basic Development Standards, Table 17.08.040-B Exhibit J -Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2005-00443 D& E-5 + ~ } I I i ~ e ; i e~Y~n~. p~,~~~ e~ue~~e G ACI(STEM11 K ~ ~ ~7LLI EN iPIJI OP ~T ~' UC IINA IA o ~ BInN Da ~I ° N , Q 1'~ KHJG AF~cx R9 ,~ -~I._ IJt~~\~/~~ ~ ~ , ALM DST-~ ~ ( ~~ ~°~!^ e ~ ~~~I ~ ~~ R ~ ` ~I~ ~A1EaDUWDDD~O ~ M1 \ ~ ~>~ ~` ~' "'I) ~ L9BAMIEP ~ ~ \`t4 aLMDt+o sr a_i.MDUOSt~ ~1~:/~ I~~~S~~ ~ ~` ~w~ ALMDND sr ~ ~ A1.MQND ~ ~ ~ a?c `1 ~ ~ z __ _ _-_ CABALLERO DR _ -_ __ __ _ ~~~ Ttox,~/ BE~VF~_ 4 ~~ _ M D~_ _ ~ ~5~ IL_ ~ o._ ` __ _ _ ~~~ ~ IDPENFARMRD ~'QEN~~M~~' ~ • ~~ HIDDEN fnRM eD ~ncITATIDtJ I ~ '~ coro~R sa ~`~' DU LAIN STRANG LN ~z ~ CARRARI C1 ~ CARflAAI ~ ~ aPflARI GT ~~ nIPJ--~ ISPE t [ ~nM APP~LQO~A a_~ \ ~ MwsruN HIRLAwaY Ci, .1I SHERWODD DR ~ Cjl~ X11 ` ~ µ~w IJ ID ~~ WHIR AY DT x ~~Pe/r ~ { £,yIGTANFD III H u a INCHPRJG N >~ PROJECT SITE 1^ -\ - ~~ CAME IA Cr ~ G •~~' AHLEP ORE BPaMGtRV00G ¢ /~ ~IIJJJJbbb DO ~~ IIrI~ ~ n ~~~ r.¢~ , JJJ 9 ~~ HILLSIDE R ~I al-____I`~~ m LLL'IND MRIiE1N flEfCi~~ Q a - ~ ~~ 3I~~~ I - ~ ~ z ~ HILLSIDE RD D BAn ~I ~ _ ~ '~ ~-I J HILLSID RD ~~~I al-~li II EGD RANCHD,,, 51 ~SR~Cir3 --- _ ° ~ 9d~ ¢ ^~ I ~ a eAN ur7 ~ L~~,.I '_.J E ' Olyyyyy Vyy ~ 3 PEACx n FFACH Cos. _ e n r MDNACD Pu ~ ~ ~PEe@l PEACx TR Nr ~ I ~ ~I' ~~~~'~ _ ~ IoMDSacT = < PtEf" < ~„ ~333)I ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~- ~' ME ~ERO i -_~IBEECHWOOODR U ~~~ g PARK-'~ _ _ ~° Pr1 w ~ IwATERFO I ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ J 1 III i w --; ; ` ' ~ m FcHwD ppppgg~~ ((('--~~~r~ _.Tl E IiWDDdR/~ rf 7' ~ ~ ~ I ~ r = ~/ °ucon + ~ GPaI DR ~I ~ APP F~ 1 iMIIS EL E~,~'n~.-.,.LX.,/ /LADNARCH ~ IL_-.°°~elf(' --)~ -IQ OC s" 9~'~~~n45IAdD~x- IzI~FRMaN y~cr- WIL NAV WILSON AVE ~Ns~P ~'I-"~Cl^^ ~Ilir-~~, -~(' ~-,~ ~ 1 DquIAM G ; ~HERMOSA AMePI W i I RIVER DR G LDEB ~; DErL '- ~ ~~l6UNR0 3 '~*sN~ W _ _ ,~ ALTA II ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ LOMA ~1 PR~ i AVE ~L21 ° r ~~ Leal c NGIW I I IDu~IGES cll~~ IDPAr.GE ST rGOME~ET DR ~ Pd S ^^° ~ ~Vl~py~ ~ ~PflS~ +. G t ~C I I - ~' ` ~ HAflRDR DR CEDAR CREFKD ° ` I - NDA~gIDG Cu D = , CflOGG KEY50R\+GETiYS - ,~ ~„~,` ~„w~--E ~~~ ,CHAFFEY ~ ANTIETAMOP~ a 4 NRA DR I ~LI~NNZ~-~G~ I~DNFBn ` --~ ~1~ '~ _ ~ III~~~jii COLLEGE I 6EVEN PIIJEG DR /~ " G ~~ ~ ~~T7~~w~~~~~ggGl~j ~9q _ ~ V T' I ~cy~5H~C1/ fit" $ ~ ~ __~~ '~' i LV'LIIBBUPG \ COCA ST EIS °%i Ststlon rosaD fl e- I ~I-' _ a Taroo BANn ST ~ s ~ ANYAN ~ ~ \, I ~~cwmua ~ ~ A~ 1~~ 11 MMIIRRAAnngA An c - ~~nysCl s ~ I .,, u DR Bffl7.Y' s ~ ¢ ~/ sT C RAC'n1P ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ b''I Q N ~I ~ ~~a7 a ~ ~~~r~ ~ 's HIG W~ AVE ~ ~ ~~ '~ I ~ _ ~ ~' RANGE c Si R Nfj.P &T ~I ~~ _ I~ S -V~ YARD"-~I~ g i ~ ~ n ~~I) ~I~I s AE'11~iD~t ~ ,.`~~Lq ~ MP DP I ~ i~IBLT9)albN~ ~~wM^5~I ~ ~~,, S~III ~ ~ IuaRBELU DP ~ og```wN°ESSmB ~~ -------:.- mG ~ro~u~'~' HIGHLANDAVE~~J ~ I ~I~ _~~-BERYLPARK :-= --- ----- Pm~.iUYE ` a ~w 1 E iiiH ^ ~ N AYE ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ w~~;:~ I Isq v3 +cxAxxEt RD BI"a vx sr FlxcxAVE fE1-GAL N~ r/ ~,Ewv'.!-, ~ _I~~ 2CATHEDAAL CT tiAlgFRIDn rPOGrR t 1~HIN ryyy CRI V 'r`p tD GAADEN ST ~ ~ ^ ~ ~~-E tBEACON PDmRn BRIO PINEWY ~~~ ~~~ F F s g ~I,¢/~ ~ ~~ / I ~JNP I ~'~tn~- 3GAGECi 1=1 rNANNCNET PI IBaY1YD0G WY- ~ L I 4TANGLEWDDD Ci H HEP Si[ IIA~F. F/re ~~~ ICABDin BAUBIIRN PI d'~~~II~~ I ~~~ Y PV~ ~~ ; 5 T RMIN,wI E ~~ 3 G $rBrlOn iYf ,r C5 6NORTrumProx OR ~,l 9 P I ING I ,BYYYLLL JJJ~ / ~DNDRa E~ F rc SL~~ ~ G C DA wG Gll . '1 19TH ST 30 Au AVE -°~ MA D~DC r ' ~ ~~'~~~A,~E~°~unrv ~-- ~ ~ r-~ ~ - 1F1. ~ ~ ~' ~ - numrc sT ~ ~ ~' s A I HAMILTax sr ~ ~ +>dR+' T L'~'~ Mi <~ __DEER ~..~5 V wuNU ~S ; °9 ~ ~~D's~kJ '~~ dp II CANYON ~ ~r„-, ,, ~ ~ /\/ I. P?e ~~ y., IGNON ~' ~ I ° 1GNDNETh~ 1 MIDND MIGNDNETTE lJ ~ A~ `U~"-+R-1/ ADLLI VICtY7NA ~ -~-IISLy~f-. ~ ~ r ~-.J ~- t wDDDLEAr GR ~- wnL, '< auy, ri I~ HISRM09A (~ ~ / -i k ~ g~ , ~ c1 ..-;~';DRaVES ~ ~ 'I Lai ~ 3 aG~ m ~_ ~~, zaflDYESmEa '~ ~3 v pN ar AIt1C'-'~ -~ ;xou-/ _SLJ ~L. yaL3J ~YueA kAyyEY r',~rnwt.•r I I - La°l , m' PEPPEAm'E IN QED I 1^' ( VICrORIAy" ~l ~I i MIPNOA'ET7 iBPM~A00w rM~D~R ~ ST ~`..I~ ` ~ ~ P.~ I , ~,~~ [71-~ ~,.,AE AVAL N ,- II~JIJI ST IFS N a ° ~~ I ~ sDDHENY PI N n ncuammw I ~' .! TAUPE ~ s t 81 ~Uw'~RPE 6i ^tl~~~] U VEflNF ST A I sIr1UAGiGY Pi yE'- I ~ 0 EN YG tD ARPma IN UUU ~ INCLI(HM1 N ~ 9~/y~ AGMT 5 MDME VISTR$ 'F ~ 11AGUNAR - lao ~^~ ~ ~qI ,,~ r~ Q~° YD:~y I - ~ a~E e ~ 1 '~. lELMGN EYISU N V 8. 71--) L~ ~LJL~ SM JIDME VIS T I ~' ~' orrtEVlsr n ~ ~ ~~.Q/s~'/Y,'y~. ~^ ~~ ~~ ~~ BPflDICETONR rtu~ ~i~ °~ ~°-,n'~~~Rl~~ `` ryrIL~RDSi ~ O ~-Rp CIELRD ~ ~I ~,' C~ G ~I~ ° I ~ C+ MEACtp~~.I ~!•,"/CAMDMYIRY ~G~'~} i' LI+EJ~ _ ~ liU3'f~l a ICE ~ IA VINE ST III I s~ ~ ,.~ ©' sl,_J~IO~L~! ;BI ILJz °Ij °L JI ~ ~ ~ „" I ~"~f~'~"i'Vrnr_]~T Ic Ic ~ I J 5T '_"' ~ LA mE Gi Jf ~ I G uAGiron ' G LOMA S ~ ~ - IACS~ ~VIF~ ~~ ~ ~I ~ J ~CARNELfAN ~4PAN~0° a sr :I ~ ~ I Q om c qr won - - SO ' ~ ~I ~e ( LOMDA DR~A s R71 ALTA ` P ~ YN- J II_' iDrT~lTa LOMA ~ ~ o in ~~ ML c -; D LQM TA ~ c `~ 2 €9R 31i Ro FgDS T ~,~ o DD BASE ?~j,~INJ LIONS ~~ ~ RD i En ( ~ I ~ • aI z` tPEPPFA ON ~GPUR eS/ ~ r - - I DrvWODD fk ~YR~,'~~L. sI LC21u AA Cr 5w atiDJ II yIl(~S~LO~ ~eO ~~ J~ II NJADA Ci HILL D RADO ST ~ ~Gt ~ IIL ~i 5I s`AL ~IMSAC~~COMM I~~ _ - ~--I~I PARK°~~r~sas~)11~ ~ ~~ BAI n ~ w4EEwvaj Gl- . .. ~ w __ -cry ~ a - - D4EWO9D~r'- • y :~ ~i~T-Jw+ a(-1~ ~11 ~~ CU IIpMONGA~~ s IIeAIAOO z I YEW ~ sT a` I~I I .., ... ~ e ~,I~r, ~nr~r ~o~~ i ~I ~~~ __.. s~ ~I~~~ ~ ~ J~PI~M~~ s ~~ ~S~~J I at'rD~LE EXHIBIT A Station TILL~BL i=mesu~~ ~ L ~IL40~0.PAJLJ ' _ ~kN~~/ fl ~.>I.- ' ~ -,---a...~,--F - 2 xry_eG~rl M ~sAax Y NraAAVE ~y ~ ~~~~ Proecr ',~'Rf1'NCHO CUCAMONGA Aw m ~ I ~ ~ ~ °~~_ ,CENTRALPARK~ ~ -- , D BFM ~~ c ^4A x r C'e„ FJL~- M~ r- ~ I `osrcll~ ~ ~ T >~" unmacnrm C7srDD rorsn DS(_-_BASE ~- -LIN ti ~• +RD rrD ~I~~ ~ EEPPEfl 3 sr Pf~gsT' ¢yI ^- / ,r~~`m-yooo~~i~ IuEAOMC as ~ ~-I'bESnLIL I i D ~ IR ~ oss+ ~ I IRDNwooor E ~~ Ii t1/g,/~arKy,,, x~LMrs I ~ _~9A~ ~ +_ I I<TI I ~ i i y-pE~.q ~ "r~~ ~~A~~/,~r \~u_s C ~DBmI~ ~mw_m~~~'"' I <~ -^`O r ~I ~I~~ 'cu~a'I~ M~ ~ ~ -1 ~ ~ ""a ~G~w.m~I~_ ~1' ~1~~~_e$j,~~'~_'' ~~ C TG III PALO ALT 9_'~~ I ~p R ~ ,~. ~"~aEa.~I~ig A ro~ ~~`° I I a SA GT ggg I~~ ~y~17 ~ ~J/`~ %\~)H^~r" ~p,~~j ` GNYON ~ °~ _ ALJ LFW IDD ~ ~ ~ro~ FF < + ~~~t4La0Pi~ MERCED~""""' ~f~8e,,~~~°~~y, W/~~rc.i I agvE'~~s ~~ IFlEGTA PL Z [NNiGRn~ o '~ c c 1NiGA0VF kIWrN ^nG~A / ~ ~ N~ ~~`^1g«~^(fff 1ADPMNG PL O r" d,.G ~ P "Y Y ~ s =CHURCH c +r a RUTH ~f~I ~t ~-t>i ma~R,~ Z,,;(na~c r ~ q~ a°7 o Ew ~SfREE`f ~ ~ ~ Ml1aJ.FC_ ~~1~~~/ hfUSSER ~ I~'i~nomG€Gnl ~P~FAA-4U.RIwr~y~,Y, YIEVI9E'r• ~>r al--1o k 61r~~I J~I~ ,$~~II~YYGG,DN S~ ~ ~ ~p®7IIL, II`F -- - `~~c~,, A r~ °c6 1~~~-llp~~ ~ ~~~ ~I GK ~ ~MADDNNATIH~' "J M~61LDC1(S ~3k EMV'Q~CK ////7~,\~9~L.~ ~.N,~„~ ~`~~~~ - a. GR>:eNW r ~ "; ]~~JJJ~ F- A~P~1 ~R ~__s~A$H~Q.SD 5T I~ `~~1~~~ \~~~ ~\\~~~ COrro ~~-rg~~,~l!(`r I~ ec IDPPJIC ~ O.NN.WFd(jER~e)/"~ }~ ~~cA - ~Eeu~ sex ~ ~~FFEN I -SST ~ C ` ~ r r ~z W ~p` eJ Dns~~~~ I ~ \.,~~~ RAi.YHM _ RAL"~""0 ~ ~~s` ~°I~RDS zIREC+scr TERRA VISTA\\ /11\`LfiWLSPARK j ~ ~- ~ ~ - TOWN CENTER --.Jfl ~~ ~SrAnA HISTORIC U 7~ 6B COURT I D E 6 ~ WMPBNIgEBT OUSE LeDAeL-st_ ~~cn~P?`T` ,~^ 1 M M -1 s ~ z ~ Q Q O ~ U U ti Q ~ --c- U vz J o ~~ V ~ Q O ~ W Q U Z ~ - Q 20 z ~ o Q U M ~ € ~ y A 8 p P6 ~ a e °a e I g( ,j5 W ([~, g[M~g[M~ (tlPtlI (€" 99 ~ ~ g~g pp X( E~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~8 t@ 4 10 ~~ yy6E Rs Ei P~~ 'p ~ ~ w ~ 1 i 8 91~6 Bk B f11 e j i f `p PBP ~ ~ o Q o, ~~ $$ i~pN~ P (E °i~i ~ ~~ ~ esg~ 3 ~I Bi ~ FpY6 n}Ie ~ ~ Q@Q@ 6 ke A ~' ~ w ~Z H F-Q ~ l'1~ ~~' f !!~i~~ ! o ~~ :d ~ n~~~~ 2 ~ ~ 9 ~ 0 °~~ e~~e ~E ! Ppl a!~ ~~ ~ ~ a~ ?. .. ¢ g ¢ . €E~1~ ~ 9( rs y55[ $QQ I5 ~6ie EPQCP w s a~s _ ~ ~~a~ pawl Ai~41A\H+~ac+d ~pWi- a~ysy t6~69ou-IhW ~ ~~ .\ Y~ _ i zt ~ ~\ or ~`______ ~~ nn. w a ,CZ'-ZRE-fOZ Nd~ 4 ~` J N ~ N q q J m l ~~ vi ;5 u r~ ~' ~ W O ~ ~ Q „ W R T 0. ~ u ~ E-zRI-EOZ Ndtr I U 0 I w E 3 0 as I~ ~ ~ ~ ° avid dsoasd~-~ ET TRE~rz Ivdi~ ~z zRl- ~rJ~ Nd~ ~~~GR~~OG Ndl~ ,4~^TAE lOZ Ndfy 7rr~~ r~N d 1~ Irv 7 .3 .? L~ t% d (ov/noz~lMO~,~aan • • • a. y ZZ U (~V/nOZ>lMO Aa3 ~~ ~ G~ ~ fir? /_E~9/ (J(v dlr i zl a ~ ___~ N q j ~ / O g ~ U z YJi 30 IOII MO G ~ ~ n ~ ----------- -- --------- ~¢ ~~ N __________ .~ _~ "' a J J r M ~ U I 4 a EXHIBIT C D&E-8 • • • Ek ~ ~` --- PROPOSED HSW HPSV- 'SYRfETLIGiLT~lTVPj ---- --- --- - C7 HYDitANTTOB -j ~!w • dT^"~^°10`~~~' ~`-. - ~ - / ~ ! _ nl RELOCATED ..~ 'l __ _ - ``^.y tl j ~ c o ~~>~~', i / I _ -.~ ~ ".-5 .....-..~ m - ; 7 PROPOS B1~7CKWACL \ ~ 1, 7 A~ . '4'~~ ~) I t ~ i ^ • i) 1 _ - PROPOSED - a I ! ~ 'P•~.0 ~ 'l^+ 1__-•y,~ I /, ° , L\I STOP S/GN I -., •; I r.L..''"• / 1'.,"Pjq/ -~/.~ q ~ t yl "1VJ ~J._,.,,,., PRDPGSEQ I - a" ('J„ I 2 -~ l ~ TfMPORARVO IV~TO BEREMOVED i ~ ~ '-I '. BrRADIUS ` ~, t -PROP I I BryL17CI~NVALI F, ~~L BUFFER °J ~„~,~°'~ ,IJ- - - - i $D'RAOIUS i-^ ~ ..tl..._ 2 .-' `'"i „ _. 7 I'I! •~`'^w„~~,~JI C~O,R~R,A.L.BUFF~R r 1 ~ ~ \~~ ~^BQUESTRlAN- ^^^~--~;.,_ •, a • 8 ~ B ' Il I. ti, i i ^+ ! - ~ fENCE 3 _ ~, . sroET _+ ~ • " , / I ~ ".PROAG CKWAL I - ' y ~ g - i WA BARS REGU(RED ~ n ~ D RAPIU ~ ~ I ~~ ~`~ ~+ YSROP 91gt;V/ALK -~ F ES DVER <% ~y)~ I _ BUFF `^° '"'1 ~ i ' '~~^ , _ Ll r ru ar ~' - psi T / Ix ~ ~ +tt *~r 8i1fST TR~S • ~' ~.. ., i= _ I t ~ 7ti `~~' ro EMovED ^~ TB'.21DlUSY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ RECONS RUC' ~ Cj CORRAL BUFFER ~ ~y "~~ ~ ~_ ~ ~ x ~ ,,,,. ' r ,, ~-- pRlVfWAV 1` I '7_ r EXIST RIIGHT'FF3YAY - ~i ji ~ EXIST BLOCK inn - ~~' - L% i ---_ m~~.~__' _ , ~ 1 ~ ,,}, f 7~ r i, - I lac EXIST TREES -'~ `4 11 ~ ,~ •i „,-_... _- _ -- ~~ t1 _ 70 RfMAfN '~ l,(F ~ ~- Cad Cd._.. ! ~ .~ ~ I~~~/y~~.,(yIT 7I -_ - - _ _ _ EXIST W ~ ~~ r \t ~ t ll, t' ~ r a I~ I^ ~"'.. ~ - " .,~ n I y ~^~-1t-~.~~ i11 SIOfWALK~ ~ 111 ..=.~'~*.-....+. Y r~ - ....`.. II 111 ~% ~it,.r• ~ ~t ~4* ~, l ~, ;/ `a 1 ~ •/ r ~,.a;_._. ; t;: _ ~, .~' - P-780 .,~µ~i .r, ^ / I / """'~'~"~ _ ~ ; I^ ~w n I ~EGUESTRWJ t ! r ~ ~ ~ r'/ - I _~~ tl EAKiNEN I^ PROPOSED` ~•rc r. en I I' _ ~f,T SWALE ~- ~f BLOCKWAU I`p_ - 1-G"47E't _ ,~yI f ~ _I_ ~_~ ~ -r-- ,'dFl ~ ~ - gRISBR I P `+i~ ~•ti .~. ,.,1 ~ ~ ._ _ , ~ ~, ~,~ -a " 1~ /, ^---1i_..•` ID itADILS +` r „~ srwrurnnm" ~ ~ii "-'^`~`,~~~1*ti ~' CORRAL BUFFER CO RCONC" ~L~S ~~ y~ ~ f - ~~ LY'1 ~ yDITCN ~ ',{W ~ 11 .y ` , is ~, .-^- ~ _ ~' ~= ~§ T "' P {' - ~`.. ~ T 1 RADIUS !„ ~ R ~...••" ~ C BUFFER ~~ r ~ ~~ - ~~ OPOSED I ' i t11 ~ ~ ~, TDRMARAN ~ ~ ~~- " ~ _ -__ - '.NORTHRIDGE DRIVE- «------^"~~ _ l w~ ~ 3~ a ~ ~ M a~ ¢ ~ 2' 0 Z zd 11 ~ c~ Q z_ ~Efj i t ~ ~ 931"~ ~ U ~ ~,1$ aZ Y r ~ .~- k ~~ ~~ F ,A _~ N u° ® ~q D& E-9 .~ . ,~ .. " ~ n ~ ~ 3 ZZq a ~~ ('' w ~~ ~ a Z ~ a gg 9 d d c3~ 0~ po ~ e U~ Z wZ 6 111 ~ = w ~ ~ Q Z o ~ ~ ~~il i3i1S'~ a O a ~ "ifli p& ~ ~ } F U d Z O `~ ~~ ,F% ~~ ~ ~ a ~ C ~` ~~~ ~, `3 1 y ~t ~ a ~~ ~ ~ ~ ® e e § ~ ~ ~ ~> a ^ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~ e a e d R ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ i ~ Y -~ ~ I ~ ~ Q M 3 ~ p ~ G C tl 1 F a . ~ 2 O ~ ~ 2 ~ v ~ R q ~ U ~ e ~ y ¢ S N 5~5e ~M1'i F~ a R ~ v y yq u,[ ~ « ~ 9 YF p p ~ R 6 ~ 666 ~ i ~eL. y_ T~r'& ~ N Y R ~ R ~ ~ ~ e ~ 6~ p ~ 2 iI ~ ~ b 2 _ R BE N ~ q x Ux h R b R 8 q C Q3 v g • • • D & E- 70 • • Tn ax ~ wt -_ _ __ _ .- --_.-__ __ ur m m __ -~- ~ - - --- A -•--- , -- ~ n- ~ -----~--- - m m ~ m ~ J ~----- ~ '-- ~ - -, -- - ~ _._ r 5 e ' S a a - ~ m m ~ _ ~ -_ ' ~ I I _ I ~ W I ; ~ p~ K O° - c~ S g ° i ' , I ~ a 0 ~ U~NZ=d ,q o F ^ _ i _ ~ I _a _ - i 0 a ~, 3, ~ ~ ~~ Q z 3i~~ i n ~~ o ~ ~ 37~1!'~ $ _ _ _ -_ ____ _ .- Q '- -~_ _' _ ___ i _~ __1__- __ _ -_ _- ~ I _ _'_ _ I'_ _ LL o W ~ ~'I~; Z R' _-- _ O a U ~ Fii ~ } 1 ~ ~ !! ° Z i N v Q a a z ~ m D ! _ / ! z- ~ ~ - ~ f'~ O I w ~ I = _ - - ~ ~ 3 t t [ - r N _ o ~ II 1 ~ a W ~ I ~ ~ z i u~ Z - ~ ; ~ d i ~ ' ! ~i r i) Y O o h ~ B I Q ~ i R r i ~ - i - ~ ~ ~ 1 I ~ o i ; I UU,p O m a o ~ { ~ r w e ~i w I I U W --- ' - -- -• - ' ' -- ----- - - I i ~ ii --- -- ; -' - - O, a O I rn (n i w , ~ ~ i rl tl ' -I -- ~ I a~- ----ix-----` I ~ ---, -' --•'- - --~ ¢ i i i ~ 3 ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' ! ! ! ~ . ~ ~ ~ m °w - a~ 3 -- -- -__ _- 7 - -- --- -- ~ - - - '- - o '- ---- - -m ~ -- m - - A -- -• / a i _- , -. _ ! j ! / ____ __ _ ~_ ~ - v m rv ~- ~- ~ - _ I - --t .ar~sg - ' "~ ! ~ ' is m m aQi m ~ ~ ~ Q I r ! 3 ~ - - - , LJ.. ~ ! ' u' ~ o a ' m ~ i ~ '~ / ~ f - - - -- - - - - 8 y - - - -^- ~-- * - U - ' - - - - - - I - --- - -- - - -- -- ~ - - --- a t - - ! ~ W v~ J ~ ~ I I ~ b ^ 1 ~ 1 , t 1 Z ~ J ! ~ , O m ~ _ ~ I 1y I y ~ '.' +1 _ __ ~ I _ _ Ur .____ _ f Z O f! / .. _ _ _ __ _ ~ _.- _ ~_ . __ ~ .__- ., _ __ ~ p W ~_.._ _I O ~~ / ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ __ ____ _ __ ~ ~ i 0 __ -_ __ Z _ __ __.. _ Z ~ ~ ___ ~ ~ ~ ~ / 1 C7 a ~ ~ i ~ O N I ° ' ~ ~ ! w n ~ I ~ O a °w i, J ~ ~ ~ O ~ N a I~ W ~ ~' 3' r U -- ~ ~ ~ i ~ / /' i J 3 Y ~O - ~ F O ~ ~ ~ N a ~ 0 ~, ° ~ V Z ~t 11 1 I U W (n . Q _ m o W _ _ I ! __ _ _ O_ m X _ _ _ I` _ LLl ~~ w ,_ _ ra{ a _ O _ ~ " _ ~_ _ __ - __ __ t _ 1 ' I I __ ~ - if O a a I W O a _ •~ 4~ p a r~ I (f~ 1 a I I - - - I - - - ` - ! - r i - -- --- - - ,- ~ - --¢~ -- - I - I - - `r i ! •' - - ~•- :'~"- 11 ' ' ~ ! !~ ' ~' U 1 1 R 1 1 ; ~ __ _ ~__ ..._.... _ _ -_ _ _ _ . _ _.. _- __ . __ __ v __-_,__ i _ _ U<m ' _ _.. _ _ ._ _ __ .- _ __ ~ _ _ _ _ - _ .- 1~ t+1 m m m m OJ N ~ A r n N ~ I~ m m m m m m N r A 1~ m m N m m ~ A ~./ v L DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS • 7.20 p m Mike Smith May 2, 20 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP - A request to subdivide a parcel of 2 99 acres into 4 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN• 0201-182-28. Related file: Variance DRC2005-00443 VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth standard to less than 200 feet in the Very Low Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, approximately 600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN: 0201-182-28. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343. Design Parameters: The project site is located at the south side of Wilson Avenue, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue, on an L-shaped parcel about 300 feet east-west by about 450 feet north-south. The site is vacant; it is generally characterized by relatively large, overgrown shrub and grasses. All of the surrounding properties are developed with single-family residences, with the exception of parcels to the west and south of the project site. The subject property and all surrounding properties are within the Very Low Residential District. The existing topography slopes from about 1,815 feet on the north side of the site to about 1,780 feet on the south side. • Frontage for Parcels 1 and 2 will be on the extension of Tamarind Court while frontage for Parcels 3 and 4 will be on the extension of Cabrosa Avenue. The critical design constraint is the 70-foot corral setback. A corral within the rear yard, adjoining trail, of Parcels 3 and 4 significantly limits the plotting of a future home on Parcel 2, which the applicant has been informed accordingly. The applicant's drawing tries to disguise this by showing a corral in the middle of Parcel 4, 50 feet away from the horse trail. The attached Exhibit A shows where the corral should be located on Parcel 4 and demonstrates how it will impact the house footprint on Parcel 2. At this time, the applicant has not submitted any house designs for review, the intention is to sell each lot individually for construction of homes by others. However, when submitted for plan check, each home will be subject to the City's design standards and compliance with the applicable development standards will be verified As this project site is located in the Equestrian Overlay, additional requirements will apply including the 70-foot separation between habitable spaces and horsekeeping facilities such as corrals and barns. Variance• The applicant is proposing to reduce the minimum lot depth standard to less than 200 feet. With the exception of Lot 1, all of the proposed parcels created comply with the City's requirements for lot area, width, and depth that are applicable in the Very Low Residential District. The average lot size will be 23,875 square feet with a minimum lot size of about 20,931 square feet. Parcel 1 is only about 145 feet deep because of the location of the cul-de-sac "bulb" of Tamarind Court created by the adjoining Tract 16237 to the east; therefore, staff supports the variance request. • EXHIBIT E D & E- 12 • • • DRC ACTION AGENDA SUBTPM17343 AND DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP May 2, 2006 Page 2 Staff Comments The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. .Major Issues• The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. Delete Parcel 2 because it cannot comply with the 70-foot corral setback (from corrals on Parcels 3 and 4) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends deletion of Parcel 2 to address the 70-foot corral setback standard before scheduling for Planning Commission. Attachment Design Review Committee Action: Members Present McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner: Mike Smith The Committee did not recommend approval of the project as presented recommended deleting Lot 2. The Committee D&E-13 w ~;~~„~~~' -W ~, WILSON !~V NU~"y ~ ~_. ~~ - ,~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~, _ ~~_ _ _~-~ 6 ~` _ ~, ~ ,' r ~~~~`.` ~(r//~.~. • C~O.•M~ICIDIVI.S;~~~,~AIL ""-~ ~~ ~< ~•~,~-.. ,_ J~ --~~ q yr~.~6'I - ~(--- _ ~ I )~ ~ ~p~}~ ~ '`~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fr~1r.'c'~a~.{r1.~v^"~l ~ r~v . ( ` ),v,I'_'F_ r.-,-v~,~`~' C' ` ~ \ ^ ~ ~. \~°~4'' ~ \ a r-., I ~Y ~ 'O m y ~~~~~~~{ ~ ~ d~9~~ .,~~~"t~,r~~~i ~~ ~ , ih;; ~' r'~7 • ~r 5 ~ ' ~ 'rv • r '~ ~-• 'i~.i~+ ~ n,m~. , !{~,i sy,~ ~~ 5 r l ~ ~r d'F v, ~r n ` l / ~ 4vN 'L:ry / n"n• ,~ _ I 5 `, r~ / ~ , 1~' '+ " Ntr ' _- \\ 1 ~ / ~ N 5 '°k7' fii it'.a +mf n~. htit.:. r ^ { ^,~ O t k,.] , `, .- \ \ ~ji / ~. '~'~'f~~ I\~- I \L ~l ~/ ^` I CORR4L , ~^ ~ ~ ~~"'f~~~J~_ ~~Q~~ ` \~~ ~ i, 99 ~ ~lr~ 1 J \ \`\ I ~ I \ ^L Jur^~ /~ i -.._ I / _~-~ { _`` `~ ``-~,-I -~ 200 D2'~-~-__.... ~-~ ' i -~~ ~ rr O ~ ~ ~?1) r - ^~ \ ^0"'Y r~~i .m h3P.m14'd b{~"s,i ' ~+rd+'r Wr,"2 5,. r^ An,u'i 4 ~~+ N\ \ ~~' `' ~falfi'`u ~ ''yt ~ §rftrz"Jr 1~r%u'1 W+r'rHaaSu; ',: r'S6k~sk~<31 '9p~c .~--_~-~ --J~-._ti T ~ QC) `' ~'i ~~' ~ ~1~ k i e . ~'~` iik"~u ;~"V'~~ ~~ :>: a "~^',+ziGyk~~ar ' I}vr`~ , e ~ ~ ~ -,. ' ~ ~-- ~ ~ ~ \ i"~RI ~~V.V~ ~~-"_'^T ~~ ~ ^ 5~~ ~,i~.T";~f ~^'.L~S~~x ~.1wl~",1 °~s,.~s, ~rk~k rrt .i~~ •~} ~` • ~~?-' I' ~ ~~"~ ~ 93502, ~"'~.-`~~ ~, P~~~O:'tJ _ ~ / '~, ~ , \ `- ~'Y-fi=t--~ +~yF`Y~'_'~~V"~"-+: `,'l`~:7~-r=.~c4'4~ `~ , µ 5 ,1 ~~ 1 f ~' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~) a ~ • ' '~~' `'~ j 999""" ' v ~ ~~ 1 r ~ r, ,u' - ~ ~. ~~ .~ ~ "% K ~~. '~ ~~ :_-- ~-1~ ~~ , ~~ ~r .. ~ ,~' X90-0-~ ~~ -- ~. _ ~~, (` -'ct-~' -'•.~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ y. F`.'!y~ ~.. .a `,,~',w"'.. '9 u rfr'r-'. .+ ~ ..~; t;. /' ti../ U' ~~, l I.i ~ Wi :`~+^~ ;^.:.,!""-,. a F~~ ^ ZSfr~,'i ~'' A"k'~!",-k"~' ,,~ _, ~~~ ,II~'.-~ -~~~-".-~_ _~'-~ , o~.<-,\ ~~~'_,~~ , ~, ~~. 82.0 _."~ -?-;~'~ ~~,~ I I_ ~~~ 1 i I D & - 15' ~ i`?;~~J~~~''s . ' ;SMs.re~ 1.:~, '`~Y~z~' '~^~„~,,,- r,._ i,~4, rPf'r~ a~ l -n -- -~ -- - ~->- _rl 1 r, ... ...``~P a. ..5 rrr ~ sa; `~ .+.. .iia a.t?', ~ ro~iw^•'r~'~`I~ - - - - -- _ - - - -~---- - r- - _ _ ~ 0 a~ cn a, U O .-~ ~_11 ~-~i 3 0 ~~~~ ~,~ v u a a~ r1 L 0 L L V c ti ~ Q L L ~ y U ~ N "S i O N m O v C N C H C m ar ~..~ C$a J ~ w J~ ~_ ~ r~ fj "1 i 1. i t C i L C C 1 4 G T, Z l C n a n a ~~ R z ~L L ~l; a a~ • G~ .~ ln_ to 1~ 1~ ~~ M N `. 4L ^~[. l""' ~) • D & E- 16 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:20 p.m. Mike Smith June 6, 2006 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP - A request to subdivide a parcel of 2 99 acres into 4 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), with Equestrian Overlay District, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN: 0201-182-28. Related file: Variance DRC2005-00443. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth standard to less than 200 feet in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, approximately 600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN: 0201-182-28. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343. Planner will give oral presentation at the meeting. Plans will be available at the meeting. Design Review Committee Action: • Members Present: McPhail, Stewart, Coleman Staff Planner: Mike Smith Revised plans were presented with an off-set cul-de-sac and relocated corrals. The Committee recommended approval subject to a condition for the developer to make a good faith effort to acquire horse access from Lot 1 across Lot 6 of the adjoining tract. • EXHIBIT F o, E.,, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, May 10, 2006, @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION AGENDA ROLL CALL: A Carlson X Fletcher X Henderson Z Karraa NEW BUSINESS X McPhail A Zupke X Dickey (Alternate) A Stewart (Alternate) 0 l~ o P Q; ~~- ~~ `~~ A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 - JONES COVEY GROUP: A request to subdivide a parcel of 2.99 acres into 4 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of W ilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN: 0201-182-28. Related file. Variance DRC2005-00443. VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP: A request to reduce the minimum lot depth standard to less than 200 feet in the Very Low Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court approximately 600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN: 0201-182-28. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343. ACTION: Continue with the item to another meeting to work on the following: 1. Redesign with cu{-de-sac realignment as discussed. 2. Work with the adjacent tract owner to get trail access and drainage. 3. Relocate corrals 2 and 3 next to the trail. 4. Determine that the corral on Pad 4 will still work with the cul-de-sac realignment. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Commrftee Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on Thrs agenda. IV. OLD BUSINESS V. ADJOURNMENT: 6:50 p.m. EXHIBIT G • D & E- 18 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE • COMMENT SHEET May 10, 2006 II NEW BUSINESS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 - JONES COVEY GROUP - A request to subdivide a parcel of 2.99 acres into 4 parcels m the Very Low Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN. 0201-182-28. Related file: Variance DRC2005-00443. VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth standard to less than 200 feet in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court approximately 600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN: 0201-182-28. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The project site is located at the south side of Wilson Avenue, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue, on an L-shaped parcel about 300 feet east to west by about 450 feet north to south The site is vacant; it is generally characterized by a relatively large, overgrown shrub and grasses. All of the surrounding properties are developed with single-family residences, with the exception of a parcel to the west and another to the south of the project site. The subject property and all the surrounding properties are within the Very Low (VL) Residential District. The existing topography • slopes from about 1,815 feet on the north side of the site to about 1,780 feet on the south side. Frontage for Lots 1 and 2 will be on the extension of Tamarind Court, while frontage for Lots 3 and 4 will be on the extension of Cabrosa Avenue. Along the north perimeter of the project site, parallel to and at the south side of Wilson Avenue, is a Community Trail. There is an existing, north to south Local Trail along the east perimeter that serves the subdivision to the east (Tract 16237) APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. This property is located within the Equestrian Overlay District whose purpose is to provide for keeping of "equine, bovine and cleft-hoofed animals." More specifically, this District is intended "to protect the ability to maintain such animals." Further, the Development Code requires a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard of all residential lots within the District, with graded access from the corral area to the trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. ANALYSIS: The proposed subdivision is located in the Very Low Residential District within the Equestrian Overlay District, which requires the development of Local Feeder Trails (private equestrian easements) The local equestrian system provides access to the rear (or side) of the lot from the Local Feeder Trail and is designed to provide access for trail riders to the Community Trail This is typically accomplished by a series of Looping Trails within the tract. The looped system allows more convenient access for vehicles (deliveries, clean up, etc.) and provides a convenient path of travel for short Local Trail rides. Access to the trail system will be provided via a Local Trail located between Lot 2 and Lots 3/4 Note that Lot 2 and 3 can access the Community Trail directly. Access to the system for Lot 1 will be via the above-noted trail and the existing Local Trail that serves Tract 16237. The Community Trail segment along Wilson Avenue on the north perimeter Item A D & E- 19 COMMENT SHEET TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 -COVEY May 10, 2006 Page 2 of the project is not complete at this time but will be constructed per City Standard by the applicant as a condition of approval. The critical design constraint is the 70-foot corral setback. Three of the four new lots will satisfy the minimum lot width and depth requirements of 90 feet and 200 feet, respectively, applicable to this district. The fourth, Lot 1, does not meet the minimum lot depth. The applicant has submitted a Variance request which staff supports; however, the Design Review Committee recommended that applicant explore using an off-set cul-de-sac design to gain additional lot depth. Based on staff's review, there is a horse corral at 5751 Cabrosa Avenue, a property located to the west of Lot 1. The properties immediately to the east of Lots 1 and 2 were not observed to have horse corrals. However, each of these neighboring lots has an approved horse corral area (it is from this area that the applicant measured the 70-foot buffer). At this time, the house product has not been submitted for review. However, the applicant is aware of the minimum 70-foot separation that is required between any horse corrals he proposes on his lots and dwellings on adjacent properties (and vice versa). This is a critical design constraint because of the layout of the project and physical relationship to the surrounding, existing lots. With the proposed corral within the rear yards and the alignment of the proposed adjoining trail, development of Lots 3 and 4 significantly limits the plotting of the future home on Lot 2. Furthermore, the corral location on Lot 4 is impractical in the middle of the backyard because it would interfere with typical improvements, such as swimming pools, spas, and sport courts. This is exactly the type of problem the Alta Loma Riding Club brought to the City's attention several years ago that resulted in increasing lot depth to 200 feet and rear yard setback to 60 feet. The attached Exhibit A shows where the corral should be located on Parcel 4 (adjoining the trail) and demonstrates how it will impact the house footprint on Parcel 2. The applicant was informed of these issues. At the May 2, 2006, Design Review Committee, the applicant provided conceptual footprints/floor plans for Lots 1, 2, and 4 in order to show a home located on these lots while providing the required corral and respecting the required 70-foot buffer separation The Committee did not accept their solution and directed them to eliminate Lot 2 or redesign the subdivision accordingly. Note that all three Committees (Grading, Technical, and Design) did not approve the project. Staff has verified that all corral pads are either 24 feet by 24 feet or 12 feet by 48 feet in order to meet the dimensional and area requirements of corrals, as shown in the attached exhibit. RECOMMENDATIONS. Staff recommends deletion of Parcel 2 and the following conditions: All trails shall have a decomposed granite surface. 2. All 'v'-ditch drains over 3-inches deep shall be located outside of the 15-foot wide equestrian easement within its own drainage easement. • • • A2 D & E- 20 TRAILS COMMITTEE COMMENTS SHEET SUBTPM16728 -JOHN DIPONIO May 11, 2005 • Page 3 3. Local trail improvements shall be designed to minimize erosion onto the public street. Where private Local Trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices should be used. 4. Behind the sidewalks, a minimum 25-foot segment of the trail may not be steeper than 5 percent. 5. The two 'v'-ditches (i.e. the proposed and ex~stmg) along east side of Lot 1 seems unnecessary. The existing trail gutter on Tract 16237 can handle minor slopes. 6. Re-locate the proposed corral locations for Lots 2 and 3 onto pads that are level with the existing Community Trail. 7. No private vehicles will be allowed on the Community Trail. Provide access from the corral pad on Lot 2 to the private Local Trail along the west side. Typically, the property line between Lots 2, 3, and 4 should be in the center of the Local Trail, with trail drainage facilities in a separate drainage easement on Lot 2. 8. If direct pedestrian-only access to the Community Trail from Lot 2 is also desired, provide a gate per City Standard Drawing No. 1008. 9. At all intersections of the proposed Local Trails with the Community Trail and/or the • street incorporate access, improvements such as 'step-throughs', gates, and posts that are designed in accordance with City Standards. 10. Any required PCC drive approaches and catch basins shall be sandblasted to achieve a surface finish similar to a "medium broom finish." 11. Trail fencing shall not encroach on the driveway lines-of-sight. Staff Planner: Mike Smith, Assistant Planner Attachments. • A3 D & E-21 5 ~Ti°t'( 1733 ~' ~~ Z~ 5-- Dn~~ 3 - ~I COMMUNfTY TRAIL ~ i !8' 78 Q _ O m U i i ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ "t s,~ ', '~, ~ ~s I ~ 1 rV ~I~. ` '?' r ~ i ~ 4 I I co~FUC l I , '- -~ , ~ ~ L - -1 i - ~ __ 1- - _ ____ l h ~ --~ -- - I 1 ~_ ~ ~` ~ ~ - - ~ ~ } , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _. ~~ i ~ ~ / ~ , \\ ~ am~ ~N ~ w rY,,:~R~s.:,. ~._.. ..... ~ ,....:wr,...r~.._~,~~ , f ~ ~' J J } l~ pj ~ ,~ rr ~.~~, ~ ,r.. ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ,.,, , ~ ~ ~ l' , ~ ;' ; ~ ' ~ , , ~ ~ ; ~~ , ~ ~ ~ . ,~. ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ y ~~ a X42' ~` `' ~ ~ ~ I ~ 9 ~ I , ' ~ ~ D ~ ~ J , _ ~ ~, ~it tt", ~ ~ „n 1~i -' ra , °y I ~~, , A t I • o r y ~ f yy ~'~ } ~ ~ i d ~ n ~ ~ i ` _ _, ~ _ , ~ ~ t~ ' 4 ~ ~:.~ P 1f3L~ 7,665 ' CONn1110N~t7 ~ ,;~~`'~ ` .~ !I , ~!; - l ~~ , ~j ------~ I ,_ ,' j _ ii , l . LOf 2 t'0551f3L~ 6,216 5Q' C~j , 1 ~, 050% ~O ~ t Q, _ ,~ ~z ~r ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ (: ~ ~ ~ _ ~~~~~~ ~: i' ~ ~;-~, -, - .-~ N ~ ,ES oa' ~ LOf I f'OSSIt3L~ 7, 57~ 50' CONt71710NF~ ~-' (-p~, D & E- 22 t ~~, .r{ ~~ ~) ~~ ~- ~ i i +. - -s•-~- 1 i i ~' . ~(' II f u ~ I (%~d~l~ • '; ,., ~ ~~- :fit sr.~, .+r; ~.~ ~._,.'~ , .~. n ~ ...ti. Y- 4 . ~ C CITY OR RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DEPARTMENT o c~cPMpNGp- ay ° `~ Z°~6 ~ - P~NN1Y 2, 2006 AE~E~v~o Al 1r,N11VN: 1JAN I:VJ..~MAN, MIKN: JM11H REGARDING MAY 2 2006 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PROJECT: SUBTPM 17343 DRC2004-O1174 Rancho Cucamonsa In response to your design review comments, the "critical design constraint of the 70-foot corral setback": LOT 2: A. It was possible to achieve a conceptual floor plan (in a 5 hour study) of 4,232 sq', submitted an example 5-18-OS virtually a full year ago and staff now recommends the complete deletion of parcel 2? (I spent one hour yesterday augmenting it to 4,732 SQ' plus a 3 car garage and added spool-per the display board). Is there an ordinance requiring construction drawings prior to a custom lot approval? B. I have prepared a colored site map showing lot 2 has a potential of 6,216 SQ' conditioned space, plus the garage. LOT 4: C. The corral on lot 4 per Mayers and Associates drawing did not show that • the corral can be even 5' further east. Per the example board the corral is 140'-4" from Cabrosa curb and 45'-1" from the rear trail wall and 70' from the lot 2 -10' required sideyard. This is not "rn the middle ofparcel 4 ". The comment that the corral location was disguised is not appreciated It is a scaled drawing. Three possible floor plans are shown for lot 4 without any difficulty. D. I attached a copy of the Stonebridge tract to the east which caused this setback corral issue. The extension of Cabrosa has been shown on maps since (if not prior to) the ear1y1980's and was ignored during the Stonebridge approval process, not only affecting the 70' setback issue but the entire street configuration E. None of the 8 approved Stonebridge lots were required to push the corrals against the property lines as you are indicating in your report. The corral on lot 4 in Stonebridge was approved with the corral at approximately 143' from their Pl and 73' from the rear. Every effort has been taken to create a viable project and correct the poor transition to Tamarind. The omitting of one whole parcel, especially after over a year of process, has serious financial repercussions. We are confident an appealing floor plan can be achieved on parcel number 2. I do not know of a Southern California City which allows random construction without reviews, compromises and the entire submittal scrutiny. • Sincerely- ~; -• ~ ~-~ ~: %`` Associated Arts _ Frances^1~reelove. ~,.c.t•3,s~Cot~e Group, _ _ _ _ -- ,. __ .~ w 0 a • U O .-a N b C," v u ro 4 d > L y O _~ Q („) H 4l 1J C ~ ~ Q L ~ L U y N 0 0 v c m c H N C ri ~0 V J wrw J m } ~ r~ n~ '?~+ a r L1 l~ to 1~ ~~ M J IL DC. c- D & E- 25 :_ _ _' ~, _ ~.. ,1612 13~~ / ~ -~'~_ ~----- ' - ~ ~, " ~ ,~,~~----- ~_" COMIGfI7Nl , IL ~ --a \ ~ ,~ ~ • ~ ,-~ "`"~ o ~ >:, ~,~j'~ ~ ~ ' I ~ o ~~' ~'Yc~4~~ia ,1"s ~+' (i ~a ~ p ~ 3~ ~' ,~ a ~ _'~.~ t 2~ i +'tu Ad7~ h ~ Fi \~ ' / a '\ ` \ LL err, IF"x'N' rn ~ b ~ l! 5 ~ I r 1,V. J ~ ~ ~, ~; DI !D ~ '~ ~ ~ 1 '~ ~ , '~ ~ rnmsw 'r ,c °~t;;rr~~rrct~ . °: ~5 Fm,~fa,+.u+a~ar;a- ~~ro.. , ~v `,~ --.~ '\ ' 7EW 9 ~ ' s 1' ~^~ ~ ~ 135 0x' -~ ~_ ~ ~P-80Q-.~. •-~ 1~ t '-~ ~ r \ S~ p~ ~~ l 1 ' J ~, . ` / ~ ~- ~. ~,,T~ " -; vim- ~•~. - `` ~ ,~( ~~ ~ tl 1 I ~ POOL, ~\ ~ \ ~ --^~~ c¢i Q -r, ~' ,_ ~ ~ ~ , T J ~ i r ~ ~ r ~` w~ C -_/ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ i = -~ -J f+J~~~ °.-... -,` ~ ~ '~..i i~°,t,~~.~ ~ ,di, ~.~+~' -aau . `Ci '`~ t L'(:: ~ ;rk , r`c, ~` ,. It ~ --~.~,.~ U ~~l ^., ~ THE S .~-~, o ( BEES ~~, ~ _ ,~ `~ L--n _ _J. r~ "--- r~G J ~Y 1 `I ./~ J/ 1 °11 ~7E ' t_a~ ~ f ~ ~ J n i ro ~\ 4 V WILSON XJ,VENU~`~ J~" 1312 ~ 1 ° T 9 ~ '""'-`~--•--~'i ~ Ic~~ I -_ ~_,~ DIC ID .T -~}~ ~ ~~ ~ «. ~ 1 1 +'_\ F ,d ~s.c.r~"~~a.-~~k~?;'- x'~=.krPm.~ ~ ~+~9;w.Y ~d lip •~~r ! ;a~ ~ ~ N\`~•`~^` ~ ,' I` ~~ 1 p V X81 ~~ Y ~ r ny Ti ~= ' K f 6 ~ .I~rw..~d 1 I y \ \ ~\ `\ ~\ I1 I I J~` \ \r_\ \\~ ~77.~ ~ --t 9 ~ .lDEW K -f~ ~ _ f \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~^'` ~ ~ a Z f 135.0$' i -_ / ~~ I F \~I-~~VO:'l,l s~ ~~~ 1 tl i l~' - - ~` ` ~~ ~ ~ ~~ r ~ ~~~ ~ - ~~ g _ ~ '' POOL ` a~ ~ ~~ ~' , ~~r ,® ~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ t jj S ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ I ~; .,~ 1 ~ `. - ~~,r 1 ~ ~ , ,~a ~ ~ - ~` ~~ _ ~ / , r ~ ~` wry ,~ ~ D ~ ~ ~~ ~_ ~ i ~ J fi~~~ '~'U- ~ ~ w'U~"' ~~~~~'1~~~ ,~ r ~ ~~'n~i F.. 'J:i~G~ ~ ~~ L~~~ !~~~, ,A~w •~'~,:f~ ~ i ~ --~•_ ~ ,L~, ~'~- 'l, ~•? vim-' ^= - `~ ~ '~ ; ~ ,,-` ~ -~~~~ ~RIS R ~'~ ~ `~r _~ ~J I ' i' _ ' ~ -G7=~~'y1, A5" ''`~'~~r ,a~l~ "'~~;ts ~ fr ~ ~` ~',,~'t+w",V '~ ~' t ~~~ ;;}'~ . _ - 1 - ,, 3;~ j~ ~~i ~r~'~ ''~ y, .tv`~rr;S~' r'a`n, ~G ~. z +,Fno- ~` ~ , ~ ~ ~~ ~ er ~ r~, i ~ J@ ~ ,r s ha4': r "' 1 1 ~" ~ r,, e ~~ a ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~' ~' 4rr K.~ t ~~r ~ -, "1 t `, ~ i ~ ~: ~ a.~ ~I7 ~ -~ ~ -, ~ ^+t ~ LAY ~?. ~ } .'.,,~I ~ E _ t L V r }~ 4 ~ ~ 1 f r '_v~ ~ - +-' ~ ~ X17 ~r+ Y ~~"" dzi ~ ~ '~~ - ~ ~ r ~ ~ - - F-~ I E 1 y C I'~ AA r ~- r r u ~ ; Y4 yea ~~,:- ' yti ' '+` - ~~ ~~ Ja ~ i w t S / ~i ~0 ~'Y ~ i ~~ ~ '"1 N ~ 7 Y ~Yy v r ~~ ~~ i L ~ J~^ I ~ 9 r1 ( 44 t 1 ~i-+r ~ ~A ~ r 1 _ S+' s~f x k ~ r .~~.` I K.- N r;f li~~ ti f ~ L~E 1 x. ti ` _ ,. r ,x_`'1~~..~ ~~ _ ~r~~~ , ~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ f, f~ 9 n, d i 4 JGyh~ .~ ~ I ~ F° f ~ I ~ `~ a, L 4 - d i ~ pf ; 1 f 7 a., ~~ .r. R 2 ~ ~~» -~ ~~' ~ r- ~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ , ~ ~; , t ' ti _ ~ 3 s .ti. r, R ~' ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .r '' rr. ~ ~ - r~ t ~ ~ ~ n„ 'a~~' ~ ~ , ~ti r ~ ~ ~;t ~' 3'r ' ~ ""~ - - u - I ` "~ f ,~.~ Yyi ~ ['~!` t•~k`}! , iii ~ '_ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ r i ~" ,.E/ 4 fo ti ~. a ~* '~ ~ zi rs , ' ~i ~ , u _ _ 1! ~~JJ , ~~ ~ ,~ _ ~i ~; ~ ,,. ,~,.i! ~l 4=28= t~ '~ ~-~~ _ E a'~nnr y~ fi SFr ~~1 ~ A ` ~~ z~ 'l „ ~~ ~ ~ ~r5 S ~~y r n~ r, ; 5 t I ~ ~ i rrr Z !+t 4 ~ ~ a r, 3 s + ~, i fi, ~ r ~ 7 ' ,t ' -^ 'n ~ k ,, yam, + t ''~ r ; u ti~ ~ , r [ 4 i ~. e I ~ zi ru ' ~ I t ( ''_ r 4 ' , r! i ^~I ~? a I r i at T r ' ~, _ r; r j r wu j ~Ar~ + r ryi fF v ~~ .~ ,~. i"` r irf 7 ~ q ~ °. t r ~jru~ 1 r nais~q+r~l~~~~d,,r{ i .. t t~~~r U1~ i r ,r~°r °rrr Y~ t r r~+r r4 ~ r f ~ i~ I nr f~, /~ ~ 1 ~( ~ Irr~~ E• ~~ I t f <, ~ -~r~4~ ` w ,ter t H`f tilt r G ~~11 r~~;~ k' , y»'r (~fl f I ! ~ ~ 5 ' iii ~n f f ~ rrr ~~ ~ } r ~ ~ A~~ i ~`i i <~~ T M ~ ~r ~ fc ~~ .-R T ~ ~rirtu~ 5Y _k~ ~rrd~x .,f i t c dr 'y"- „>~~ ey~,~1, ate. '~ ~ _1 j,_$, _ ,- ~ ~ i a+. °~ r+ M~ai2~~~vy~~r" ~ t ...-fc~~ .nH y j'~r~~ye' )j i ~lu~riy~ t~ ~y4^4y ~f~ Ft{ w~ ~ G~ ~F`~}y, ~ r~itp~ 1 y i i 'M ~Vfviu T' ~1 ~ t M1 b5d ^[ ~p~, ~ w Y .. rap ~`r }cY.~J. -vN' ~ + ` p, 3 r Uri ~ ~~' ~~~ ,fir i 'f(~j ~ _ t~~ m- L r~ ii ~ 1F 1 hi 5 ~ i~"y'~,q .~ ,q" « ae i'rfiF~,r'~ '( ' I +~ ~r 7r.! d"rl `'it'i~J~ ~ `~" `i~ ~r ~ p q ~s ,f ~t% '~ + ' 'U la ~ '.,atYi n,. ~ u T. ~` `~ t ~ ~ u r r: ri ~i r ~~ u . ~w ~µr yI ~V ~ ~ dr "~ r ~~~ ~_ w ~~ J fl L,~,~m~~51~,~ rl ` ' ~ 'Xa~n "rp r~+ 1 c ,'s 'd~f =d$ ~ +14~.t ,^yK~1~'~JI.T, ~5 ~ ,,/ Y Y 14 ~ rr,~~i ~~~• np rr ,~ ~j~'.ii1'~,JiRt "*, " Jn ~ "1~; ."~m F~_~~W ~~ ~~~.J ~~firL,}5 ~ a V r a ' ' `~~ ~ ~ 1k I ~ ~ ~~^~i ~~~ ~ it i} ~r~ ~r`>,-r le~%4 ~ ~ ~ ~V j{~ i ~ ro 5 r ~~~ r ~ S~ I`~,',r 'kS'di ~+«• a '' ~ i ms's i ~. i ~ «r r ~rr ] .Y `~'' ~ ' ,~~~ r r ~~ tr r i~ ' 44 ~y~ 4r'l ~~~'~ i ~ 1 ,+it ~~, ,rj 1 u .~ ; ~ 7 ~+ ~ ~,,. ~'rmal x " ~ r ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t v~ ~ Ir ' ~''"y'!~~~ r u r ~ `f ]1i ~raa ~ ~4 ~~' t ' ^lix J, ~ `g ~~ J" ~"~i f`is ~~yr ~'~ aj "~ r< wv qnt ~ ~ 9 S r I~ ~i n ~ "'W~a i ~ ~f ~ r i r;~~F 1 rl r ~ ~ ;t f L^ v `` ~ " ~ ,,~ ~ ~if to 1M L J. ~ 1'v 1 f r C i~» , '7 r~: ~ 1C ~ ~I 1 "j'yJ~~ x' .fir ~I ~ ''~ r3~s' ' I ~ _ ~ E" I}p}{I~ p~ l e""p~'n y i ~ ~' ';'~ 10.. y'nFr~w~ '~W'r ~'7 ~ I~ ~ ~ Lr^ A! G ~~ b ti rt Y -~"~ '~~ ~ ~, 7 X42 r " n I _ .~,y1~A fit! i ~y ,,~~~'~yy~ , ~ ~i~ ' r „'~w~{ ~=Y~~~ ~, tr r ~~1~ r ~\ly~~®~\~ rD ~ y~ I Syr` r < it r ', ' x+' ~ ry~ Via'" r ' r ~ ~~ r t t i .~c '~, ~41R ~ I r '~ F" e rrr` I r ~ h{ '~~ ~ +, ~ i ~ ~..r; +fu~r~:,k,,r~s,~ r (I .:. ~~ ~ f~:,y, +~ ,~' r + -~ +r' if ~' + I ._ ~ ~~ it r ) ~~~ { 1 r ~ t ~ ~ i } ~ , E 1 ^~ "Ir ~ 1 i t s' ~ t ri _ r '~ ~i','' ~~5~, '+~ r }Ir ~, ~~,f,~~;' ~ '~ I ~ ' z'+ - ~ r r' +4~,1 fni~r sw Sr ' ~' 'r~ 1'~o.~~r YIF yf~'7 v yy ~ , i ~ `' 1 ~r r i ^ ,j~%~~{rF ~ ar ,' f' 'C 'kf a i .. _ x4 ~z F~= s. ' ? ", r r 'S ~ '"' t y r.. ~ ' ,~ ~ ~ r,°~.. r i ` ` ~, ~r ter. ~f t ~ ~ ,, , r ',~~ r' r , i ~, K, r 'fir" v sz m~ 4 + r ~ u`r ~{ ~ ~ ~ _-~ ~~ ~ , I E'er' ' r i sir r f ` / k J ~ ! fF +^ ~ ~ r ~ f sit ~; t ~ 1 ~ ~ Y vP - ~ 4 ~ I^3 t 1 l t , f Yry ~ ~ f z ~~ _ y ' tw T ~ 7 i £ .r Jf ~ I _ y P 7'~ 1 r 11P~ t ~ ~v ~~r its ~, r y'r n ~ rr ' ' -v ~, °' /rte 3{ '(a~ ~ i ' , ~^~1 g~ 5 - ,3~ra~ r '; s r 5 ~ I J ; ., i~~~f ~~ r~~ Ay `r`te "+' ` 4 u ~` ~ r ~ 4 .., s i r rr i ,"r~ f"t ~ ~ ';;'x~z ~ x ~` r" (' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ot~~ ~f ~ »t r'r ~ ~.~, ~` - ~~ s ~ ' ~` r i Y- , ~ ...._ ._..._ ,. _ ___F rJ .. ti fi fff! ~ 2(•.~ ` '( ' 4 y s~ v yi t y ~ t ^1 A n t ~ f ~ ~ „ y rt k r? ~ 1 ~j S,~ Y rv` r ~ ~ ~ ' ~ Y / l ~# ~ '~ d ~ t~ A v ~ r ,+ C +vr~, i '~ ~„ f~a ~ ~ tif~t~~ ~ • ~ .. _'r 3 ~ , T c t 'rT. ~ P_ ~ u ~~ '~ r ~ ~ 1 r 4 s . x. .. rFY ^ }, -_ r ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ti ~ . '_..i,'kS _~ N ~ m' ~ " d ~ 1 .- ~~ Yy~ ^T{ t ~ ~ ~ t~ h s ~ ~ t~ ,~ i _,.- ~ ~'~ ~ ~~ " ~ ~,Ki •'0 K x j rt~+ r ~. i F v fi~ ~ _ t~ 1 l ~ yy Y i ~ ~ ;. t 1 ~ ~ , x ~`~' N~ 4 i i f ^ ^ i ,. ~ ' 5 1 i ~ * _ ~ "~ ~ ~~ 'flsv~ ~ ~~,~~~~ ~ ~kr~'`~~ . . .x ~ ~ p t m fi ~ ~~, f ' ~ ~~ :, L'~ ~r~ i +'a ~~ $ r_~ t ~ ~ ~, ~~ - . " i t ~ rtvt ~m _ ~ ~ wr ~ b ~ i~ ` ~+ ~x ~'~ fst t ~'~ X ~' ~ , . ~ ~""s ~~~ t ~ ~~ * CCJJ , ..~ Au ~'~#~ ~ ~~ i 7 ~ t~~i ~~ , ^ ° ~ ~ ry` 1~ „ ,ersy r~K ~4i~`r ~thi~ a' p 4~ h„ _ t h5i~v ~ ]~M fryi~l:~ ~ i'~YiF~~l~ ° ~~ ~+' L T! ~ ~ k . yy.. ~ ,j f J.. { l . A } , L ~ 4F pt f M cc ..~ rt}~t ~' 4s r C f w Y ~e{ ~ ~ w ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ th t~ >» ~~~ ,. t y Y . 3 ~i~` ~r ~ ; ~ ry fpm zrA ~ih~. . du ' ~ 1 ~V~ ~~~I .. ~ ~ •~ 1 k ~r C /a` ~ ~i.i ~~ Y ...L~"I ~~ z6~~~ .1st - ~ ~~~s ~r~a+s n ~, z '-, y 3~°~~ ~M '~ ~~ © s.. ar ji~~ }y "y`Y r4 ~`o ~~i ~ w ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ W~1 ~ ~~ W~ ~ ~~ '~ Yr ~ Y l ~~ ~. ~'r,S r .~ ~ ~ 7 ' 4 ~ ~a_ f th x~ ~~ ak~.t ~ ~ t fill// _ .. r k-., Y' 1r ' n ~l~ r ~~ ; a ~ ~y . t ' i S •~ '~..7,Jj t * ' M , E ~ 1 ~ i ~' , IF ~ ~ ` ~ai` ~ f f 9 ~w ~~p~~ ~ 0. S'$ {r1 ~t. ~. ) ~ ~ _ i , , j ~ A ~ 6 'r ~ ~~~ r ~, N x ~~ i wi 11ff 'u~ i# `i YI y xp 6 /~~.] xw '~{ ~~M1 yy~ k l~~ Jf § ~ ~ 1 t w x ~ ~'~ ~ t ~~t ` y „p r_ ~0.~ Z ~ t ,~ r , e ~S r V ' .~« ~ a pfr i ~i ~- i r q ~~ S^ ~ ~~ r 'M ~• L ~ / a.. I h , >,~s ~ a~~ ~ ~ ' ` s ~c ~ ,,~. '; y '~t 1 Cl~ t i~ ~ t' F ly ~! ~ , ~ Z ' ~r ,~ A d r ~i ss W a m ~ a, , j ~ ~~; ~ T :W e , M k d .+ ~ ix _ g y' € i w ^'' +~ ~ .~ ~yy i 4* y i , ~ .iii y ~ 4 s`S ~~ ~ ,~ '_ 4 ~a ~~ E~ ~~tA ~ n 5~ n y~, .r~ 1 ~ . s `*~. P 5 ~ ~ w y ' I ~ , ~~ ~ ~ $ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ W y L i ~ E' S f ~ ~ ~ ~ , k-r ~r e~'°; '~ ' ~t ~ .30~~ ~-r~~r;~'~~' ~~~ ~ ~J7,~& ' - 7,:~#~ ~BM~.'~. ~ i«, '.Y.. ~ ~. w,rn .. _..~ w ti .~.c<M'.s~ki 3 , ; 1 1 't~t ` ,. {~~ df t~ ~ 1 ~ ~ F' .. wfh~ t`,y~'',. y` ..3 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ';fith~ i ~: r , t, ~a ~~ f 't ~ '~' , P ,~~ `, F r ~,y ~~, W may,., f ii , t 7 ~ ,r 6 ~ .4' ~ `4 F ~ a { r ~ ~ i ~' \ f ~ v , ~ q, t ~ C }, ki'~ ~ ~"~''@~ r ~' ~r+ ~ c R ..S'%'.~ ~ ~ `w y ~ t~ tX s .. ~~ _ ~ t ~ ~ r w ~~K ~'t-+ r• ~ ~~ t ., ,~ ,~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ r , ~ P .wc.t'' x~ti.~~ ~t5~ sl~'~~~~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA l~ TRAILS ADVISORY 9 P ~~ COMMITTEE AGENDA f WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 2006, @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Action Agenda I. ROLL CALL A Carlson A McPhail X Fletcher X Zupke X Henderson X Dickey (Alternate) X Karraa X Stewart (Alternate) I1. NEW BUSINESS A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP A request to subdivide a parcel of 2 99 acres into 4 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), with Equestrian Overlay District, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, approximately 600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN 0201-182-28 Related file Variance DRC2005-00443 Staff has prepared a • Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration (Mike S /Cam) VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth standard to less than 200 feet in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, approximately 600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN 0201-182-28 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343 (Mike S /Mark) ACTION: Approved with an additional condition added for May 10, 2006 Recommendations. 12 If Lot 1 is not able to secure permission for Equestrian access to the existing adiacent Local Feeder Traif to the east, then upon development a minimum 5 feet wide Equestrian access gate will be required within the side yard return wall for access to the street and provided trail between Lots 2, 3, and 4. III PUBLIC COMMUNICATION None was received IV. OLD BUSINESS None V. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6 24 p m EXHIBIT H D & E-31 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET June 14, 2006 NEW BUSINESS A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 - JONES COVEY GROUP - A request to subdivide a parcel of 2 99 acres into 4 parcels m the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN 0201-182-28 Related file Variance DRC2005-00443 VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth standard to less than 200 feet in the Very Low Residential Distract (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court approximately 600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN 0201-182-28 Related file Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343 BACKGROUND This application was previously reviewed by the Trail Advisory Committee on May 5, 2006 At that time several revisions/corrections were requested to be reviewed at a follow-up meeting, the applicant has responded with changes which Staff believes address all of the Committee's concerns • SITE CHARACTERISTICS The protect site is located at the south side of Wilson Avenue, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue, on an L-shaped parcel about 300 feet east to west by about 450 feet north to south The site is vacant, it is generally characterized by a relatively large, overgrown shrubs and grasses All of the surrounding properties are • developed with single-family residences, with the exception of a parcel to the west and another to the south of the protect site The subtect property and all the surrounding properties are within the Very Low (VL) Residential District The existing topography slopes from about 1,815 feet on the north side of the site to about 1,780 feet on the south side Frontage for Lots 1 and 2 will be on the extension of Tamarind Court, while frontage for Lots 3 and 4 will be on the extension of Cabrosa Avenue Along the north perimeter of the protect site, parallel to, and at the south side of Wilson Avenue, is a Community Trail There is an existing, north to south Local Trail along the east perimeter that serves the subdivision to the east (Tract 16237) APPLICABLE REGULATIONS This property is located within the Equestrian Overlay District The purpose of the District is to provide for keeping of "equine, bovine and cieft- hoofed animals " More specifically, this District is intended "to protect the ability to maintain such animals " Further, the Development Code requires a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area m the rear yard of all residential lots within the District, with graded access from the corral area to the trail with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet ANALYSIS The proposed subdivision is located in the Very Low Residential District within the Equestrian Overlay District, which requires the development of Local Feeder Trails (private equestrian easements) The local equestrian system provides access to the rear (or side) of the lot from the Local Feeder Trail and is designed to provide access for trail riders to the Community Trail This is typically accomplished by a series of Looping Trails within the tract The looped system allows more convenient access for vehicles (deliveries, clean up, etc) and provides a convenient path of travel for short Local Trail rides ITEM A CT~~ /< S~ D & E- 32 TRAILS COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 -COVEY • June 14, 2006 Page 2 • • Access to the trail system will be provided via a Local Trail located between Lot 2 and Lots 3/4 Note that Lot 2 and 3 can access the Community Trail directly Access to the system for Lot 1 will be via the above-noted trail and the existing Local Trail that serves Tract 16237 The Community Trail segment along Wilson Avenue on the north perimeter of the project is not complete at this time but will be constructed per City standard by the applicant as a condition of approval As identified previously, the critical design constraint is the 70-foot corral setback Three of the four new lots will satisfy the minimum lot width and depth requirements of 90 feet and 200 feet, respectively, applicable to this district The fourth, Lot 1, does not meet the minimum lot depth Although, the applicant has submitted a Variance request which staff supports, as requested by the Design Review and Trail Advisory Committees, he has revised the design of the street cul-de-sac (Tamarind Avenue extension) Because the south side of the street is shifted northward, (i a tt is an 'offset' cul-de-sac), the depth of Lot 1 changes from 145 feet to 165 feet (a gain of about --20 feet) which brings the lot closer to compliance with the minimum lot depth requirement and allows for a greater separation between the house and its corresponding horse corral Another, concern was the corral location on Lot 4 that was located m the middle of the backyard This would be considered impractical, because the corral would interfere with typical improvements, such as swimming pools, spas and sport courts The applicant has shifted its location to the southeastern corner of the lot Note that compliance with the 70-foot buffer is maintained as the proposed house on Lot 2 was shifted northward The applicant was also directed to work with neighboring property owners to the east, (Tract 16237), to obtain access easements to existing trails The applicant is in the process of doing so Additional concerns included the location of the horse corrals on Lots 2 and 3 (the applicant has shifted them closer to the trail on a pad level with the adjacent trail), the location of gates and corresponding access to the Community Trail (the applicant has relocated the gates so that access is to the Local Trail instead) and the scope of trail related improvements RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions (note some conditions have already been addressed by the applicant) 1 All trails shall have a decomposed granite surface 2 All 'v'-ditch drains over 3-inches deep shall be located outside of the 15-foot wide equestrian easement within its own drainage easement 3 Local trail improvements shall be designed to minimize erflsion onto the public street Where private Local Trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices should be used 4 Behind the sidewalks, a minimum 25-foot segment of the trail may not be steeper than 5 percent 5 The two 'v'-ditches (i e the proposed and existing) along east side of Lot 1 seems unnecessary The existing trail gutter on Tract 16237 can handle minor slopes A2 D&E-33 TRAILS COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 -COVEY June 14, 2006 Page 3 6 Re-locate the proposed corral locations for Lots 2 and 3 onto pads that are level with the existing Community Trail 7 No private vehicles will be allowed on the Community Trail Provide access from the corral pad on Lot 2 to the private Local Trail along the west side Typically, the property line between Lots 2, 3, and 4 should be in the center of the Local Trail, with trail drainage facilities in a separate drainage easement on Lot 2 8 If direct pedestrian-only access to the Community Trail from Lot 2 is also desired, provide a gate per City Standard Drawing No 1008 9 At all intersections of the proposed Local Trails with the Community Trail and/or the street incorporate access, improvements such as 'step-throughs', gates, and posts that are designed m accordance with City Standards 10 Any required PCC drive approaches and catch basins shall be sandblasted to achieve a surface finish similar to a "medium broom finish " 11 Trail fencing shall not encroach on the driveway lines-of-sight Staff Planner Mike Smith, Assistant Planner Attachment • • • A3 D & E- 34 Table 17.08.040-B -Basic Development Standards • • • VL L LM M MH H Lot Area 22,500 8,000 6,000 3 ac/~/ 3 act~l 3 acf0 Minimum Net Average Minimum Net 20 000 7,200 5,000 3 actU 3 ac/~/ 3 ac/~ Number of Dwelling Units Up to 2 Up to 4 Up to 6 Up to 11 Up to 19 U to 27 p (Pennttted Per Acre) Mmrmum Dwelimg Untt Size Single-Family Attached 8~ 1,000 square feettHl regardless of drstnct Detached Dwellings Multiple Family Dwellings 550 square feet regardless of drstnct Etficienc /Studio /01 One Bedroom 650 square teat regardless of drstnct Two Bedroom B00 square feet regardless of district Three or More Bedrooms 950 square feet regardless of drstnct Lot Dimensions 90 Avg 65 Avg 50 Avg Mrmmum Width Very +/- Vary +/ 5 Vary +/- N/R N/R N/R (Q Required Front Setback) 10 5 Mrmmum Comer Lot Width 100 70 50 N/R N/R N/R Minimum Depth 200 100 90 N/R N/R N!R Mmrmum Frontage at Front 50 40 30 100 100 100 Pro art Lrne Minimum Fleg Lot Frontage 30 20 2D 50 50 50 (!~ Front Property Lrne) Setbacks je1fMr ~ Varyv+g/_ 37 Avg c Vary +9 37 Avg N/R N/R r/ ( Front Yard 5 Vary +l 5 5 Vary +l- 5 Comer Srde Yard 27 27 22 27 N/R N/A Intenor Side Yard 10/15 5/10 5110 10rDJ N/R N/R Rear Yard 60 20 15 10rDj N/R N/R At Intenor Site Boundary 30/5 20/5 1515 15/SrOi 15151Dr 15I5iDr (Dwelling UnIVACCessory Building) Residential Building Separations rMl N/R ~ N/R Requrred Per Section 17 D8 040.E Height Lrmitationtp 35 35 35 35/~ 40i~ 551 Lot Coverage 25% 40% (Maximum % iM) 50% 50% 50% 50% Open Space Required 2,000/ Private Open Space , N/R 1,000/ N!R 300/150 225!150 150!100 150/100 (Ground Floor/ U par Storv Unit) Common Open Space N!R N/R ' N/R 30% 3D% 30% (Mrmmum Percent) Usable Open Space i 65 % 60% 40% 35% 35°~b 35°/ (Pnvate end Common) Recreation Area/Facility N/R N/R N/R Required Per Section 17 08 040 H Landscaping /~/ rOj iOj Regwred Per Section 17 OB 040-G Amenities N/R N!R N/R Regwred Per Section 17 08 040-R EXHIBIT I N/R =Not Requrred Notes (A) Excluding land necessary for secondary streets and arterials and in hrlisrde areas shall be dependent on the slope%apeclty factor contained rn Section 17 24 080-B (B) As measured from the ultimate curb face on public and Pnvate streets Refer to Table 17 OB 040-C for additional setback (C) Venable front yards allowed pursuant to Sectron 17 08 060-N (D) Add 10 feet rf ad/scent to VL, L or LM dtstnct (E) Less than 18 feat from back of sidewalk requires automatic garage door openers (F) Lrmlt one story wfthrn 100 feet of VL or L drstnct for multiple family dwellings (G) Penmeterlandscaprng and rntenorstreet trees (H) A single-family detached dwelling less than 1,000 square feet may be authorized when e development exhibits rnnovabve quaOGes m tract, plot and architectural design through the approval of a Condrtronal Use Permit (1) Senior citizen pro/acts are exempted from this requirement (J) To assure that smaller units are not concentrated rn any one area or protect, the following percentage limitations of the total number of units shall apply 10 percent for efficiency/studio and 35 percent for one bedroom or up to 35 percent combined Sub/ect to a Conditional Use Permit the Planning Commission may authorize a greater ratio of efficiency or one-bedroom units when a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balanced mix of unit sizes and types (K) In hJllsrde areas heights shall be limited to 30 feet as specified in Section 17 24 070 D 1 (L) On existing lots of record, parcels less than 3 acres or less than the required minimum frontage moray only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range i adddron to the standards set forth m Table 17 D8 040-B development within the Carvn Planned ommunity shall be governed by the standards outlined rn Table 17 14 040-A nai Development Standards Table 17 OB 040-C sets forth minimum development yards for restdentral d& eE p 35 t pro)ects flied up to the maximum density permitted by ~nsity range U i _ ., ~~ ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM .~ ~!-~~ Part I -Initial Stud :,_ ( v) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink Use the tab key to move from one line to fhe next line ) Planning Diwsion (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. • INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please note that /t Is the responslbd~ty of the applicant to ensure that the appllcatron rs complete at the time of submittal, Crty staff wdl not be available to perform work required to provide missrng information ~~~~~.r~,~r_~,/ ,/~ /~~ ,/ Appl~catlon Number for the project to which this form pertains '~ Yc.~ (/~/ ~~'! '~'" Project Tlt/e ~~~~~-Y ~E(,(~ Name & Address of project owner(s) ~~ ~ ~~( ~~ ~S ~~ao ~~t-~ca1~0 ~~~ r~ 1~~1"~ LO tit ~ ~ ~ ~ 17 3 ? Name & Address of developer or proJecy t sponsor ~~i(,~.Tr}IQ /~(~'(~ "~~C-~v~C~ ~~s,.ol~ lXHIBIT J I 1PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 1 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 D & E- 36 Contact Person & Address ~~i(~.TE,!!/ ~c~"(~ ~ ~Q~Ci~S ~.(~.LCu E Po Qo~. ~~~ ~ ~ L~~~~ ~ °~ a6 ~ ~ Name & Address of person preparing this form (~f different from above) Telephone Number ~l ~ ?l~ ' ~ a ?jL~- *1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 17) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and rnd~cate the site boundaries 2) Prowde a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site, and representative views of significant features from the site Include a map showing location of each photograph 3) Protect Location (describe) ~~ ~ W ~L~al '. 1~ ~ C~~~S~ • 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet rf necessary) ~ y ~~ ~ d'ZCJ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ _ ~~ -U~ru *5) Gross Srte Area (ac/sq ff) ~ ~~ ~~_,~-~c> *6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets & proposed dedications) ~ s'~'~ 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary) I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\IniYal Study Part1 docPage 2 of 10 Rev 3/17!04 D&E-37 Information indicated by an asterisk (*) rs not required ofnon-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff 8) Include a descnpbon of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies rn order to fully rmplemenf the protect - - - ivu - is v ~ ~- - 1 ~i P~tg/G ~tF~7S._,, ~-~ C'c~r~ ~.~s ~-~ex~~I~l.~ ~t~K(~ 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as rt exists before the project including information on topography, sort stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures Atfach photographs of significant features described In addition, cite all sources of information (i a ,geological and/or hydrologic studies, brobc and archeological surve, yls, Traffic studies) ~d S`CQ.GIC("c:12GS, '(~t~/SpS' `~I~-~I~-S ~rn~ l1-~! ~4L5 C~ 1 ~`~- ~~/ L~~.~ • 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of The site Crte all sources of information (books, published reports and oral hisfory) I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Irntial Study Part1 docPage 3 of 10 Rev 3/17104 D & E- 38 11) Describe any Horse sources and them levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway Horse, etc) and how they will affect proposed uses ~ / I L~,~,6a~~C~~ - S l(a~tFl~1T ~S`f~n~CE ~ct~t~,~~r~S~ • ~3c~c ~c~,l~s . 12) Describe the proposed project rn detail This should provide an adequate descnpfron of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project lnd~cate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary '}~ l-~'dSl.~~ ®F CA~~STQ U.LTI ~ C~?- Ck``[~2_t•t l~l~ln 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including informafion on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc ), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc) and scale of development (height, frontage, sefback, rear yard, etc ) ~~T ~Ir/J S~ cf T'{~ 14) Will the proposed pro~ecf change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the pro~ect~ 0 • I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER1lnitial Study Part1 docPa e 4 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 D & ~- 39 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term Horse to be generated, including source and amount How will these Horse levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses What methods of soundproofing are proposed T`tQ(.~s~ Co-~~2ccu-ta~G ~ ~~t~ ~cD~-f~p...~ -t-z5 C~ `rLt ~ h~1 ~ crcc~S - `16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains ~~ • 18) Indicate expected amount of wafer usage (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further c/anficatron, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Drstnct at 987-2591 2 ~ ~ z .cep a Residential (gal/day) - Peak use (gal/Day) '~ ~ ~• ~~ b Commercial/!nd (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indreafe proposed method of sewage disposal ^ Septic Tank ~ Sewer If sepfrc tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed rnd~cate expected daily sewage generation (See Attachment A for usage estimates) For further clarrficahon, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Drstnct at 987-2591 a Residential (gal/day)~'`~'''~ ~ b Commercial/lndustnal (gal/day/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units ~'t Detached (md~cate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum !ot size t~(ln~ . ~ ~ 20, o00 • ~C1,~5~'( t~l~ '~cyl2 SA L~ I \PLANNING\FINAL\FORMSICOUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 5 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 D&E-40 21) Ant~apated range of sale paces and/or rents l`u7~ ~Lt~K~ Sale Pace(s) $ to $ . Rent (per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unrt type ~j'('1 t+( a~ .~~ 23) lnd~cate anticipated household size by unit type ~-5-r( f,r~~-~_'~~~/~ 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be res~drng within the protect Contact the appropriate School Drstncts as shown ~n Attachment B a Elementary b Junror High ~_ . c Senor High ~_ COMMERCIAL, INDUSTR/AL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 2 Describe type of use(s) and maJor function(s) of commercra/, industrial or instrtutional uses 26) Total floor area of comm cial, industrial, or ~nsbtutional uses by type 27) Indicate hours of operation 28) Number of employees Tota Maximum Shift • Time of Maximum Shift \`., I 1PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initial Study Part1 docPage 6 of 10 Rev 3/17104 D & E- 41 29) r ide breakdown of ant~cipated~ob classrficabons, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an rndicat~on of the rate of hire each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary) ~~ 30) Estrmafron of the number of wor rs to be hued that currently reside in the City `31) For commercial and industrial uses o , indicate fhe source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions (Data should be verified through the South Coast Arr Qu ity Management District, at (818) 572-6283) ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serwng the project been contacted to determine them abrl~ty to • provide adequate service to fhe proposed pro~ect~ If so, please indicate them response ~CtSTt.~~ M~r•J c?T-cc.rrt~s, -t=-~~ ~s ,~cr.~p~-c~ ~~J~c~ ~!~c=mss 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matena/s~ Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's, radioacfive substances, pesticides and herbicides, fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable l~qurds and gases Also note underground storage of any of the above Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as fhe dates of use, ri known 1 ~fJ • I 1PLANNING\FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Irntial Study Part1 docPage 7 of 10 Rev 3117/04 D & E- 42 34) VVII the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge ofhazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not l~mrted to those examples listed above If yes, provide an inventory of all such matenals to be used and proposed method of disposal The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans • -,-, ~ - t hereby certify that the statements furnished above and rn the attached exhibits present the data and rnformafron requrred for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my abrl~ty, that the facts, statements, and rnformat~on presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief I further understand that additional information maybe requrred fo be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga Date ~~~ ~'fi~J' Signature Title '~~jQ~~ ~~~~~~. • • I \PLANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER11niUal Study Part1 dockage 84310 Rev 3117/04 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family Multi-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Institutional/Govemment Industrial Park Large General Industnal Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family Multi-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source Cucamonga Valley Water D/stnct Englneermg & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 • I \PLANNING\FINALIFORMS\COUNTER\Initiai Study Part1 docPage 9 of 10 Rev 3/17/04 D & E- 44 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P O Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey Hlgh School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 • • I \PLANNING(FINAL\FORMS\COUNTER\Initiai Study Part1 docPage 45 f 10 Rev 3/17/04 1511 ~76 '~~ VVILJV/V _ f-~V IVUC ~, ~ 7 ~'~-_-"_' ' ~ , _~ ~._/ ~~~ 1812 18fi1 ~_ ~ . _ 1'~ ~ ~~ d a 1 ` + Q~ v n.a ~ 1 ~k4 ~ ,. In i~~ t ~ 6 ~t t ' ~, A `1 ~~ ~`,1 ~~ r 81 ~ 5 ' ~. Ss ~(~i~ ~i I ~ ~ ~ o, ~~o-~~ ~ ~P 4.0 `~R~ ,~' J ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ -`J ~ ~` ~ - 20 IIr~-~''1 ~^_ ~ , ~ 1 ~ ~ '^ ~vi'.r.'A s. 1Fs. .Fi~: .4'qy. , .St 1i4:rnn«4 w ~ 6 ~ N `~~ ~ ~ 1 ' ~\ ~t 3 ~~~~ 11 ,~ ? ~L~~~ ~., 4 --f~-~~- ~ 7 ~ )EW K ~ 9 ~~ ~ ~ ~ '~~ \ ~ O ~ I~~~ ~ ~ s-~~`~~;, ~ ~~ ~~~ /1796 4 ~ ~` }i ~~~ ~ 7 a Z gas oa' ~--- ~ ~P-$~~-.-Q._. ~,~ rr `~ Sys \ ~ I .,~- 1795 ~' o° ~ 1\ C POOL \ ~+ \ ~--.~~, fir( \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~} ~ \ ~ ~ .E ~ -r°Y'' 7 ~~ ~ ~ ~ f` w ~ 11i''' (` ~ r _ r1 ~ 5 0 ~ a~~.1- ~ ~~ / ~ ~ 1' 3O ,\ \~ 1 XL ~ / --~~ f m B,~ L/ ~.-~ ~ ~ ( \ 17 83.~ pip ~ -. . ~"= ° ~ g(r ~ ~ ---R ~ 1 / o ~~~~ ~ ~ A~_ v .. a 1 1 ~ i EE5 1 ~~ U / ~`~ _ ,~ ~ r ~ 1{ i r ~, ~ ~ ~ ,ti, r' ----~- =4g, C City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND Project File Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343 2 Related Files Variance DRC2005-00443 - A request to reduce the minimum lot depth standard to less than 200 feet in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, approximately 600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN 0201-182-28 Description of Project Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343 - A request to subdivide a parcel of 2 99 acres into 4 parcels in the Very Low Resrdentiai District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), within the Equestrian Overlay District, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue -APN 0201-182-28 4 Project Sponsor's Name and Address Frances Freelove Associated Arts P 0 Box 446 Silverado, CA 92676 • 5 General Plan Designation Residential 6 Zoning Very Low Residential District (0 1-2 dwelling units per acre) 7 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The vacant project site is bound on the north, east, and west by existing single-family residential development The property to the south is vacant and zoned Very Low Residential with Equestrian Overlay District All surrounding properties are zoned Very Low (VL) Residential The site is located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, a secondary arterial street The property has a slope from north to south Vegetation is limited to low grasses and a small grouping of trees at the south end 8 Lead Agency Name and Address City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9 Contact Person and Phone Number Mike Smith Associate Planner (909) 477-2750 10 Other agencies whose approval is required (e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) None • D & E- 47 Initial Study for TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 GLOSSARY -The following abbreviations are used in this report CVW D -Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report FEIR -Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PM,o -Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast Air Quality Management District SW PPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Pian URBEMIS7G -Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than-Significant-Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages (x) Aesthetics ()Agricultural Resources (x} Air Quality ()Biological Resources (x) Cultural Resources (x) Geology & Soils (}Hazards & Waste Materials (x) Hydrology & Water Quality ()Land Use & Planning ()Mineral Resources (x) Noise ()Population & Housing ()Public Services ()Recreation () Transportation/Traffic ()Utilities & Service Systems ()Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation (x) I find that although the prop will not be a significant effe i agreed to, by the project pr c Prepared By Reviewed By protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there i case b cause revisions in the protect have been made by, or A MI GATED NEGATIVE DECLARAT N II be prepared Date ~ z~ ~~- Date ~ Z (2!-~ ~- • • Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 48 • Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 3 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant with M~4gation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1 AESTHETICS Would the project a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vistas () () () (/) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (/) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (/) quality of the site and its surroundings d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (/) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area Comments a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the protect site The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15 b) The protect site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State • Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga c) The protect site is vacant It is bound on the north, east, and west by existing single-family residential development The property to the south is vacant Ali surrounding properties are zoned Very Low (VL) Residential The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this protect Design review is required prior to approval City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution d) Housing product has not been submitted for review However, when homes are constructed on the site, there will be an increase in the number of streetlights and possible security lighting used in the immediate vicinity The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the protect site The impact is not considered significant C7 2 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (/) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (/) Williamson Act contract Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 49 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Signifcant With Mmgation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (/) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural uses Comments a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance The protect site is vacant It is bound on the north, east, and west by existing single-family residential development The property to the south is vacant Ail surrounding properties are zoned Very Low (VL) Residential There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2 The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by existing and planned development Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful, therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Pian The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated • b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City c) The protect site is vacant It is bound on the north, east, and west by existing single-family residential development The property to the south is vacant All surrounding properties are zoned Very Low (VL) Residential The nearest agricultural use, an active Christmas tree farm, is about 1 1/4 mile to the south of the project site Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 3 AIR QUALITY Would the pro/ect a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (/) applicable air quality plan b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (/) () ( ) substantially to an existing or protected air quality violation c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () () (/) any criteria pollutant for which the protect region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (/) () ( ) concentrations e) Create obtectionabie odors affecting a substantial () () () (/) number of people • Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 50 initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 5 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortm Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Im act Impact Comments a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Pian for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities While most of the dust would settle on or near the protect site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area Construction is an on-going industry m the Rancho Cucamonga area Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented • to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAGIMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 6 Less Than Signficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Signihcant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e , wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means • 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM~o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 • 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not ~n use After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted m the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 6) Based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5 6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PMio) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates m Table 5 6-4 of the General Pian FEIR, therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant The following mitigation measures shall be implemented • 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 52 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 7 • 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council c) As noted m the General Pian FEIR (Section 5 6), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air • contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 According to the SCAQMD, protects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401 The protect site is located adjacent to homes, and is within 1/4 mile of Chaffey College, both sensitive receptors Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impact to less than-significant levels e) Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sigrnticant w~tn Mitigation Than Signtficent No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () () () (/) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (/) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 53 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information So rces Potentially with Than g pp u Signficant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (/) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (/) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () () () (/) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (/) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation piano • Comments a) The protect sate is located in an area developed with residential uses The site and its • immediate surroundings have been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and single-family residences According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities No riparian habitat exists on site, meaning the project will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on site As a result, protect implementation would have no impact on these resources d) The mafority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed No adverse impacts are anticipated e) There are no heritage trees on the project site, therefore, the proposed protect is not in conflict with any local ordinance f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4 No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur Rev 5/24/06 • D & E - 54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 9 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Signdicant with Millgation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 5 CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (/) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064 5~ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (/) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064 5~ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (/) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (/) outside of formal cemeteries Comments a) The protect site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2 24 (Historic Preservation) There will be no impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the protect site, • however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Pfan FEIR (Section 5 11) Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special quai~ties as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse protect effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CE~A guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the • protect area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of-Influence, including the protect site, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils The protect site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2, therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented 2) If any paleontological resource (i a plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the s-te full-time • during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, an accurate all recovered fossils for documentation m the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e , San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum d) The proposed protect is in an area that has already been disturbed by development The site and its immediate surroundings have been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and single-family residences No known religious or sacred sites exist within the protect area No evidence is in place to suggest the protect site has been used for human burials The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097 98 As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site No adverse impacts are anticipated • Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 11 • • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Signifcant w~tn Mrt~gation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the pro/ect a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (/) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known faulty Refer to Dwision of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 ii) Strong seismic ground shakmg~ () () () (/) ni) Seismic-related ground failure, including O O O (/) liquefaction iv) Landsiides~ () () () (/) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoils () (/) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (/) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or coilapse~ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (/) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (/) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater Comments a) No known faults pass through the site, and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5 1 of the General Plan FEIR The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1 5 miles southeast of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 1 25 miles (north) These faults are both capable of producing MW 6 0-7 0 earthquakes Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to MW 7 5 earthquakes is 13 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„, 8 2 earthquakes, is 15 miles northeasterly of the site Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions • during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control, however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 12 Less Than 9gndicant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Signdicant Wi,h Mitigation Than Sigrnficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Imoacl as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW~CB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions • c) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer The protect would not • withdraw water from the existing aquifer The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5 1-2 Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 No adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits These types of soils are not considered to be expansive Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5 1-3 These soils are typically stable No adverse impacts are anticipated e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed 7 HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS Would the pro/ect a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (/) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (/) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school Rev 5/24/06 • D & E- 58 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 13 • • Less Than Signihcant Less Issues and Supportin Information Sources Potentially w~tn Than g Significant Mdigauon Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (/) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (/) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wiidlands~ Comments a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are expected b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state The City has adopted a Standardized Emergency Management System Multi-Hazard Functional Plan to respond to chemical emergencies Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant No adverse impacts are anticipated c) There are public schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site Hermosa Elementary School about 1,400 feet to the west and Chaffey College about 750 feet to the east A private seminary school is located about 400 feet to the east Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors No adverse impacts are anticipated . d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials No impact is anticipated Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant With Mtligation Than Sgnrficant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Project site is located approximately 7 75 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from awind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005, however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7 8 HYDROLOGY AND WATER DUALITY Would the pro/ect a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (/) ( ) requirements b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (/) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g ,the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (/) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (/) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality () () () (/) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (/) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation maps Rev 5/24/06 • • • D & E- 60 initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 15 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With Mdigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows () () () (/) i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (/) loss, m~ury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or damp ~) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow~ () () () (/) Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) Project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment Prior to commencement of construction of a protect, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit The General permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation Perform inspections of all BMPs Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) To comply with the NPDES, the project construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post- construction operational management of storm water runoff The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Mayers & Associates Civil Engineering, Inc on February 2, 2006, that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store Rev 5/24/06 D & E-61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 16 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact and use hazardous materials Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent Construction Actiwties 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical • 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included m grading plan, and implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this protect will be corrected through a remed~ation or restoration program within a specified time frame • 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Post- Construction Operafiona! 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Mayers & Associates Civil Engineering, Inc on February 2, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the Clty for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030 The proposed protect will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2 The development of the site will require the grading of the site and Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 62 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 17 • Less Than SigniOcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sgrn4cant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact excavation, however, will not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities c) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river Ali runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and pity Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, the protect will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site The impact is not considered significant d) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, the protect will not alter the course of any stream or river Ail runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official • and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows The protect will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site No impacts are anticipated f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts The site is for new development or significant redevelopment, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution The following mitigation measures shall be implemented 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a protect description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho • Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 18 Less Than Signficant Less Issues and Su Ortln Information Sources hh g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Off~ciai for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit g) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected h) The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm dram system designed to convey a 100-year storm event The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drams as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6 The protect site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5 No adverse impacts are expected • ~) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the protect site, therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of • the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City 9 LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the pro/ect a) Physically divide an established community () () () (/) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (/) regulation of an agency with turisdiction over the protect (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (/) or natural community conservation plan Comments a) The vacant protect site is located at the south side of Wilson Avenue about 600 feet west of intersection that streets with Haven Avenue It is bound on the north, east, and west by existing single-family residential development The property to the south is vacant This protect will be of similar design and size to the residential development that was recently constructed/completed immediately to the east The protect will become a part of the larger community No adverse impacts are anticipated • Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 19 • Less Than Sgrnhcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Pp g Potentially 9gndicant With Mdigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) The protect site land use designation is residential The proposed protect is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The protect site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5 3 of the General Plan FEIR, the protect site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources, therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the protect is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan 10 MINERAL RESOURCES Would the pro/ect a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (/) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (/) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use piano Comments a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, therefore, there is no impact b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Tabie IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site, therefore, there is no impact • 11 NOISE Would the project result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (/) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (/) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (/) levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect~ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (/) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the protect vicinity above levels existing without the prolect~ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (/) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the protect area to excessive noise levels Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Significant With Mrtigauon Than SigniUcant No Impact Incorooratetl Impact Impact f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (/) would the project expose people residing or working m the project area to excessive noise levels Comments a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out No adverse impact expected b) The uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations As such, no impacts are anticipated c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic, hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project d) Housing product has not been submitted at this time The General Plan FEIR (Section 5 7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts • 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m • and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase The preceding mitigation measure will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment, however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris The following mitigation measures shall then be required 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the • developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 66 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 21 less Than Significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Significant w~tn Mitigation Than significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport Located approximately 7 3/4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path No impact is anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits No impact is anticipated 12 POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (/) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (/) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (/) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere Comments • a) The protect is located in a predominantly developed area and the four potential homes will not induce significant population growth Construction activities at the site will be short term and will not attract new employees to the area No impacts are anticipated b) The project site contains no existing housing units No adverse impact expected c) The project site is vacant land No impacts are anticipated 13 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause sigrnficant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services a) Fire protections O O O (/) b) Police protections O O O (/) c) Schools () () () (/) d) Parks () () () (/) e) Other public facilities () () () (/) Comments a) The site, located at the south side of Wilson Avenue about 600 feet west of that street's intersection with Haven Avenue, would be served by Fire Station No 5 at 11108 Banyan Street, located approximately 1 mile from the project site The project will not require the construction of any new faalities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 22 Less Than Sgnificant Less Issues and Su ortin Information So Potentially with Than pp g urces Signdicant MiUgaUOn Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact facilities Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the protect so no impacts to fire services will occur No impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the protect will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the protect site is within an area that is regularly patrolled c) The Alta Loma School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the protect area Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Hermosa Park, is located about 1 1/4 mile south of the protect site The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are antiapated • e) The proposed protect will utilize existing public facilities The site is in a developed area, • currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The protect will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 9 9), the protected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the protected demand The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council The proposed protect is consistent with the General Pian for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the protected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City 14 RECREATION Would the pro/ect a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (/) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated b) Does the protect include recreational facilities or () () () (/) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment Comments • a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Hermosa Park, is located about 1 1 4 mile south of the protect site This protect is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 23 • Less Than Signiticant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources pp g Potentially Sgndicant With Mmgahon Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees No impacts are anticipated b) See a) response above • • 15 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () () (/) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections) b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () () (/) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (/) either an increase in traffic levels or a change m location those results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (/) (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g ,farm equipment) e) Result in inadequate emergency access () () () (/) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity () () () (/) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (/) supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks) Comments a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 52 average vehicle trips daily The proposed project does not include the development of single-family residences at this time However, the Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each residence, when completed, will generate 13 average daily trips daily As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5 5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation No impacts are anticipated b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family residence will generate 1 two-way peak hour trip daily In November 2004, San Bernardino County Rev 5/24/06 D&E-69 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 24 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources PP g Potentially Sgndicant With Mdigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site No impacts are antiapated c) Located approximately 7 3/4 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns No impacts are anticipated d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature No impacts are anticipated e) The protect will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will . therefore not create an inadequate emergency access No impacts are anticipated f) The project design will be required to have adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity No impacts are anticipated g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e g ,bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc ) 16 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the pro/ect a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (/) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (/) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (/) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects ~ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (/) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed Rev 5/24/06 • D & E - 70 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 25 • Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Sgnihcant Wi,h MtligaUon Than Signdicant No Im act Incorporated Im act Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (/) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (/) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (/) regulations related to solid waste? Comments a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity The • project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater No impacts are anticipated c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A grading and drainage plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits The impact is not considered significant d) The project is served by the CVWD water system There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project No impacts are anticipated e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity No impacts are anticipated f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939 Therefore, no impacts are anticipated • Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 26 Less Than Signdicant Less Issues and Su Ortln Information Sources PP g Potentially Sgrnficant With Mitigation Than Signdicant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 17 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the protect have the potential to degrade the () () () (/) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the mayor periods of California history or preh istory~ b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (/) limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future pro~ects)~ c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (/) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly Comments a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3 Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources, however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)) These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required • c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 72 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 and VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 27 • construction activities were completed The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) • Rev 5/24/06 D & E- 73 01/24/2007 15.08 9094767114 SHIRLEY ENUIRONMENTL PAGE 02/02 Jan 24 07 0317p Bob Christie (951) 924-0781 P 1 1nit7al study for Glty of Rancho Cua~monga TEN7aTIVE PARCEL M,~P $UBTPM1TS43 and VAAIAhiCE !]RG"~oo5-Clf?443 F'ar~e a8 APPLICANT t~TIF{CAT10N cert,fy that I am the eppi~cant for the project described En this In~11ai Study I ecknorvledQB th~R 1 have reed This InfCal Study and th opassd m~rg8.tion measures. Further, !have rerfaed the Prvlect plans or proposata and/or hereby ~~r er~ Proposed rnltigatran measures to avoid tng effects or mlt-gate the eft9ct6 ro a p061t WhE+ra d y iftcant environmental eAfeats waulti occur. Applic2nt's Signalers: Print Marne and THIS Daze 1~~' • • Rev Sl24lOB • D & E- 74 • Clty of Rancho Cucamonga :4 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION s ';i- The following M-t~gated Negative Declarat-on rs be-ng circulated for publ-c review -n accordance w-th the Cal-forn-a Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code Protect File No. l-entative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343 and Variance DRC2005-00443 Public Review Period Closes February 28, 2007 Protect Name Protect Applicant Jones Covey Group Protect Location (also see attached map) Located on the south side Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, approximately 600 feet west of Haven Avenue - APN 0201-182-28 Protect Description Requests to subdivide a parcel of 2 99 acres into 4 parcels and to reduce the minimum lot depth standard to less than 200 feet in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), within the Equestrian Overlay FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the protect may have a significant effect on the environment and is • proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study The protect file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847 NOTICE The public ~s invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period February 28, 2007 Date of Determination Adopted By D & E- 75 • RESOLUTION NO 07-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A PARCEL OF 2 99 ACRES INTO 4 PARCELS IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 TO 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) WITHIN THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE, WEST OF SYCAMORE COURT, ABOUT 600 FEET WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0201-182-28 A Recitals 1 Jones Covey Group filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17343, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 28th day of February 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date • 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 28, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to a parcel of about 130,240 square feet (2 99 acres) within the Very Low Residential District, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, west of Sycamore Court, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue, and b The subject property is an L-shaped parcel about 300 feet east-west by about 450 feet north-south c The subject site is vacant and is generally characterized by a relatively large, overgrown shrub and grasses, and d The application contemplates the subdivision of separate parcels with lot areas ranging between a minimum of 20,931 of 28,288 square feet, and the subject parcel into four square feet and a maximum D & E- 76 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 2 e Lots 2, 3, and 4 will comply with all of the City's Basic Development standards for lot dimensions including area, depth, and width, and f Lot 1 will comply with ail of the City's Basic Development standards except depth The required depth in this development district is 200 feet while the proposed depth for Lot 1 is 165 feet, and g The applicant has submitted a Variance application for a reduction in lot depth for Lot 1 (Related file Variance DRC2005-00443), and h The applicant has not submitted any applications to develop the site Any proposals for a subdivision and construction of residential structures on these parcels will be subtect to review and action by the Planning Commission or the Planning Director at a later date -these parcels will remain vacant until then, and i All lots will have direct access to a public right-of-way Lots 1 and 2 will have access to an extension of Tamarind Court while Lots 3 and 4 will have access to an extension of Cabrosa Place • 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows • a The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan, the obtectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located b The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially incurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity c The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration D & E- 77 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 • Page 3 b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (n) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends The site has been previously disced and weed abated Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission • hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a single parcel (APN 0201-182-28) of 130,240 square feet at the south side of Wilson Avenue, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue, into four separate parcels 2) The development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Very Low Residential District and the Equestrian Overlay, including the separation of horsekeeping facilities such as corrals/barns and dwellings • 3) Precise grading of the project site shall be consistent with the finished pad elevations as noted in Exhibit D of the staff report D & E- 78 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 4 • 4) All trails shall have a decomposed granite surface 5) All "v"-ditch drains over 3 inches deep shall be located outside of the 15-foot wide equestrian easement within its own drainage easement 6) Local trail improvements shall be designed to minimize erosion onto the public street Where private local trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices should be used 7) Behind the sidewalks, a minimum 25-foot segment of the trail may not be steeper than 5 percent 8) The two "v"-ditches (i e the proposed and existing) along the east side of Lot 1 seems unnecessary The existing trail gutter on Tract 16237 can handle minor slopes 9) Re-locate the proposed corral locations for Lots 2 and 3 onto pads that are level with the existing community trail 10) No private vehicles will be allowed on the community trail Provide access from the corral pad on Lot 2 to the private local trail along the west side Typically, the property line between Lots 2, 3, and 4 should . be in the center of the local trail, with trail drainage facilities in a separate drainage easement on Lot 2 11) If direct pedestrian-only access to the community trail from Lot 2 is also desired, provide a gate per City Standard Drawing No 1008 12) At all intersections of the proposed local trails adjacent to the community trail and/or the street, improvements such as "step-throughs", gates, and posts shall be designed in accordance with the Development Code 13) Any required PCC drive approaches and catch basins shall be sandblasted to achieve a surface finish similar to a "medium broom finish " 14) Trail fencing shall not encroach on the driveway lines-of-sight 15) If Lot 1 is not able to secure permission for equestrian access to the existing adjacent local feedertrail to the east, then upon development, a minimum 5 feet wide equestrian access gate will be required within the side yard return wall for access to the street and provided trail between Lot 2, 3, and 4 Engmeenng Department 1) Wilson Avenue is a "Secondary Arterial" street This standard has a • 32-foot (from centerline) minimum pavement width Install missing street improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer D & E- 79 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 • Page 5 a) Install a parkway community trail Use City Standard Drawing No 1003 for "side on" conditions and 1002-A for "rear on" conditions, transitioning to loin existing trails to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Provide astep-through without vehicular access, per Standard Drawing 1007, at the intersection with the private local trail PVC fence shall not encroach into intersection lines-of-sight b) Access ramps at the intersection with Cabrosa Place shall be medium broom finish c) Provide three 9500 lumen HPSV streetlights d) Wilson Avenue frontage shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) work program e) Revise traffic signing and striping, as required, to reflect the proposed Cabrosa Place intersection f) Provide Class II Bike Lane g) No new driveways are allowed on Wilson Avenue • 2) Tamarind Drive is a "Local Residential" street This standard has a 36-foot (curb to curb) minimum pavement width Install street improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer a) Dedicate right-of-way width for cul-de-sac per City Standard Drawing No 112 (with modified tangent length) b) Provide three 5800 lumen HPSV streetlights c) Show private inlet from trail drain to curbside drain outlet on street improvement plans and provide continuous concrete overflow route to the drive approach d) Install cobble between sidewalk and curb for Parcel 4 "frontage" on Tamarind Drive that is outside the rear perimeter wall 3) Cabrosa Place is a "Local Residential" street that shall be reconfigured to loin Wilson Avenue This standard has a 36-foot (curb-to-curb) minimum pavement width Install street improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer a) Replace temporary connection to Wilson Avenue with street improvements to City standards • b) Record the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (by the owners of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 5996) for the west side of Cabrosa Place D & E - 80 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 6 c) Vacate the west-to-east portion and remove any existing street improvements on it d) Vacate the remnant of the knuckle, west of the proposed right-of- way, retaining a sidewalk easement if the sidewalk is not relocated e) Intersection with W ilson Avenue shall be a water barrier to flows in Wilson Avenue Fiow lines on Cabrosa shall have high points that match a projection of the adjacent right-of-way (back of sidewalk) elevations, unless a drainage report demonstrates that a lower elevation is sufficient for Q,oo f) Construct sidewalk on the west side of the street, property line adjacent g) Relocate existing drive approach located on the knuckle h) Provide access to Wilson Avenue for existing Cabrosa Place residents during construction of permanent street improvements • 4) Provide a drainage easement for the local trail west of Parcel 2, • separate from the trail easement 5) Determine the capacity of existing downstream public drainage facilities that proposed private storm drain will loin, and upgrade, if necessary, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 6) Revise City Drawing No 1889-D to show the private storm drain connection 7) Provide a gate in the top of slope wall at the south end of Parcel 1 for access to maintain the slope and toe ditch 8) An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of W ilson Avenue shall be paid to the City prior to final map approval The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage 9) Single-family residential projects, up to four units, are exempt from paying fees for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program Nevertheless, prior to the issuance of building permits, the "Exempt Projects"form shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Department • D & E- 81 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 • Page 7 Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions Contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied • either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted m SCAQMD Rule 1108 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adfacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a • result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements D & E- 82 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 8 Maintain a mrnrmum 24-inch freeboard ratio on sods haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM~o emissions 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters • 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study Wrth the assistance of the archaeologist, the Crty of Rancho Cucamonga will • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the Crty to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of • approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines D & E- 83 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 • Page 9 Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving 2) If any paleontological resource (i e plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that maybe appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, • divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i e ,San Bernardino County Museum) • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected speamens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM~p emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction . 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes D & E- 84 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 10 • 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Pian (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Speafy the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or • off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site Post-Construction Operational 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Mayers & Associates Civil Engineering on February 2, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be • submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits D & E- 85 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 . Page 11 7) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identifythe structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 8) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (i e , a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit Norse 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible m first phase 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings D & E- 86 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 12 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Pam Stewart, Chairman • ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of February 2007 by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • D & E- 87 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No : TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-0443 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified m the Mitigated Negative Declaration forthe above-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained m the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through ail phases of the project The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City m performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will betaken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 D & E- 88 Mitigation Monitoring Program TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 2 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the protect planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the protect planner 4 The protect planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the protect planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The protect planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the protect planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The protect planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to • hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after protect completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term protect monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the protect site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits C D & E- 89 • • ("' a a z F- N J Y W U Z O Z 0 a i~ W '"' al ~ c .Q °3 a o W Z Z a J a w H a ~ Y T I a ~, ~ ~^^ i~L Z n- Q~ ~' _ ~ ~ r~+ U N ~ ~ O +_• a ~ -ri- ~;~ ~+=_ ~ . : ~.ru= w~~- s ~ r~~~~ "~~ £ , a ~~r~ ~~e~`e u ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~~t ~ N N N N N N ~~ ~ ~ ti ~~t ~6 y .}~'~ r~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ • 9 ~! ~.. '' ~~ a ~ a a a a ~ ~ . Q a a a a a • ~ = a o 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ 9' =~~~ nYr~~ • ,~~ r„ ,~~~ U U U 0 U U ~~ ~ MiS ., • '~ o 4 m ' ~ ~ ,~ ~- U ~ n- 0 ~ 0 m 0 m 0 m ~4 C O c~ 'p 0 CL ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ O co O ~`? O -O ~ ~ ' r 0 ~p U"p OU C O ] N O O _ ~ C Cn ~ pr"6 X ~ -O ~L ~~ ~ . ~t = ~ C~ i O ~ ~ ~ N~_~ _ ~ C O -O ~ N ~ N Q r ~ O N L ~ U ` C O U ~ O O C V p C y~ -p ~~ V ~~ `~~ O ~ O :LNG ~ O- E C p~ ~ -_.Q~ ~ N C ~... u1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O p O ~ O ~ ~ ~' ~ V y Yes ~`~~~ CO O m ~ m~ Q) CG f~ V U ~~ E-o ~ Q~ O EU ~ ° E c ono ~~z~ ~ C. p 0 0 c~ ~ O CL 0 D7 i ~ ~ N ~ cB -p ~ p ~ O ~~a~F i ' N ~ p ~ CJ > ~ U ~ Q Q_ C~ C in C ~ O O O ~ ~ p Q ~ ~ 00 L ~_ ~ y ~ N ~,n~~a~ ~ ~~d.' ' ~ O ~ O ,~ ~ .~ .C >, L 7 > C~ C -O CA U ~ U ~ ~ .~ O y ~ ~ ~ -_ ~ C U ~ ~ r ~ O C ~ > Q > (S1 ~ ~ '~t2~ ,, ~~~ ~ N i~~ ~ a ooaca ~~ L O~~ a Eccn °~ °~ `~ N cG p ~~~~ ~ O o~ O p E a -O ~c , ,< _ ~p _ _ C Q Cn 7 U O ~ c o N _~ N U C c~ a1 ~ O C C O L O ~ ~ ~ U N ~ a C~ O ~ ~ O RS O ~ j z ,( 3 ~ c0 ~ i Q _ ~ v~ O ~ ~ Q O ~ ..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'a fd a1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C C ~ '~~ C ~ O ~ 7 ~ O O ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ O .~.. ~ ~ O O o C ~ ~ L N y O ~~.=~, ~ U U ~ U > ~ U C O i ... 7 ~ O ~ Q ~ ~ ~ p r n Urw •~{ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ Q C ~ V .C tup ~ 0 ~ ~ Q V ~ T O ~ (/) Q y ~ - aE ~a~~ a~ c~ ° o E ~~ o ~ - ~ cc ~ - o - ~ ~ ;,~C Qoa~mQV>> ~~aUmo~OU~ QaO..~ Qc QoCS D & E- 90 0 T ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N ~'t cl' ~t ~t d' cr cY N ' a a a a s Q Q Q ~ Q Q C C C C ~ y cC a c~ s cC a c0 a o 0 o c c (~ a c~ a O O O O U p L U p~ _ U L ~ 0 U > ~ 0 U > O ~ O ~ _N > O > O > O > C N C ~ C !n C ~ ~ ~ N O ~y LL mm LL mm LL / ~ LL ~ O ~ 0 L ~C\ O U L ~ O ~ O U U U U U U U U U U U O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m D) 0 0 " C 'D ~ U _ p O Q ' L O '~ f~ O _` = RS O ch O C U "O C O C O '~ C O Y CLS L ~ N O ~ C C O O C ~. L - to O~ cC v~ O L U p O ~ O .D ~ Q U O N L O ~ to ~ O O~ [~ N O d N C~ to C U O O O ~,~. ~ ° ~ C~ O ~ L~ O~ O O c ~ ~ c ~~ ~~ E O~ O N L O ~ a ~ ~'~ ~ Q~ O v ~~ C C y ° ~ ao m °~~ ~ ~ -ate ~~~~ -o ~ -°'v ~c ~°~ c~a> °`~~ ~ _d iasi v >c ~~ as° °~ ° m~ L O `'3 O to N O~ C m C O C L . N~ >' » O ~ O L -~ O to 7 O' N (~ _ R5 OJ U L Q C .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d U Uj CSS L N ?~ ~ O C to ~ O) C ~ C !n > CO O O L ~ ~ a N U ~ Q ~ f' ~ U ~ ~ C~ °' - C to f0 C o ~~ c i x ~ c~ ° ~ m cac E ~E ~ ~~ ~ U)~3 >- o~L ? as ~~ a~ ° `-ate _° ° ° O > m o o cn c ~ c aci cis m ~ ~ ca 'o ~ -° ~ ~ ~ ° L ~ ~ ~ nci °~ > ~ U "O ~~acn Q -o~~a O ~ mca~ °- Na macro-a ~ a>? U L °m ~ w O > ~ Q O N N - O U O- ~ O U ` O c7 O O ~ O O> O ~] O ~ L U - ~ U N Q cSS C O L N O c~ - U- ~ ~ C ~ c6 cn ~ ~ ~ -' O ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ N cts C O C N ~ ~ a ~ O c0 X 'O O O m ~ ~ ~ ca O ~ ~ ~ N ~ - C U to in - ~ ~ p _~ ~ cL0 O ~ ~~ O O O ~ C i _ ... ~ _ L~ ~ O) N Q 'D O C~1 ~ U C~ N >. C Q) .-. O - 16 O N p~ L o O U 7 D1 j L O O~ O N O O 'D O Q N c0 N O~ N U (~ a p p ~ C O_ ~ ~ C 7 N » L N~~ U _ ~ N i ~ ~ i L N C N ° a> > cn ~ c~ o oY ~ a ~ ao ~ a~~ o c ~ ° L a 0 cn 'a Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ° osc ~ ,,,_ c ~ ~ ~ ~ m .c a N ~ c c _ o ~ c~ ° .C L U X O ~_ U a> U C c ~ >, O~ O O C U ~ C6 O _ N N ° U o U ` ~ ~ C6 (n N ~ D ciS O Cn ~ ~ f- U Cn ~ (n ~ C ~ N o E ~'J (n ~ c ~ . N . _ ~ ~ OC fII L > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C N ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ . > ~-- fA > ~ U ~ c6 ~ ~ t~ F-- OU U • W O • N • D & E-91 • • • a a ~ ~ ~~ t`_ ~; r~1 ~~~ k y t!, ,s ~P u ~, ~~ a a a s a ~'4 z C C ~ "'~ ~ '' ' O O ~ n ~ _ L ° ca a ca n. a"~s,~ ~~ n a> a ~ a~ a a> n . ~ 0 0 °~`~ -y o 0 0 `0 0 ' p i . ` _O _O O O O j *t,.-: rid Q~ Q) _ Q~ _ ~ ~ ~~'~il ~ ~Mi 4 ` lean ti (, ry 3 k d ~7 nti ~ ,.rni^ d i ~1 ^ f ' U U ;r~"~' U U U U U ~~_, ~~ „ _~~ ~~~+ + ~, x,' , ' l m O O O j {r ~ ~ Ml1 W /~1 W 'v ~ ~ m m i 4~ nr ~ ~ ~ d ~ N O) O L C L N 'D .O C ',d'n, ^~; N= C L N ~~ O O L 'O C~ 0 0- N (~ L~ to ~ 'II N C U O¢ ~~ U L ~ C C~ c4 c~ ~ `., r 0 7 N 0= C U B Q C CII ~ ~ O c W L1 p~ O C N ~ ~n ~ L ~°' O ~ ' U O ~- U ~>o~c~ O 'D c0 ~°i ~~ - N ~ O N O "~~iv C C N d L m°~ ~c° ~ m°~ y o + , o°UO~c n cEa~ Off ~ °~ cL g a ~ ~ •° ~~,~ ~ ~~ ~`_ ~mL u~o ~ ~ ~ E ° O C N~ ~ ~ o a 'O ° ' c ~ L m C6 -C f0 O U C i C U O ~ C _ L 1 _ ~ C~~ U ~ U~ cn O~~ L C~ N C Q C O~ Q~ ~ cn~~n ya ` '' ~°'~~a>U ocU `~com ~ ~~~~ E °~mc _ 0 ~ U ( _ ~ c0 ( O~ ~ c0 ~ O ~ d ~ U Q O ~ O ~ C ~ ~ ~ O_ C O y i L U (0 U _ U L C~ L O) _ U~ L L a O L ~ U ~~~ N C ~ O N L L D_ O L O O ~ E~ O O U ~ p L C N ~ N~ O_ E: O N L E ~~ ^' O C C0~ O ~ to O ~ ~ O N OL ~ ""' - c~ N O _p ..-. ~ O O _ N -C ~ ~ ..., ~ O i W L C i O O >' c ~, O~ O ~ L U G O N ~~ E C (~ co ~ y c .~ >, C ~ O O.. ~ 0 o O7 O~ ;; O O RS ~ L Q 'O ~ c N '~' 0 7 to ~ y C 01 C O O '~_ U c0 N p OU t/~ O ~ O- O ~ O ~ "y U~~ c~ ~' U E~ O> O ~ O p0. O c~ Q C O O O- ~ O U~ p ~ C C (0 C ~ O . _ C~ ~ O ~ U C ill _ ~ L L cC L O O O O O N~~ Y ~ - O Q c~ ~~ O U _ to ~ c~ O C C U _ U Cq O U ~ O O ~ ~ _ L ~ O c~ cC U~= ..Lr U o ~cQ- p -o ~~°'~E.~.: a~ rcrfa~ ~ ~ ~a~o ~o~ ~ ~ E°c ~ p ` N °'~E ENS j ~ C S " ~ U ~ ~ L ' ~ ~ ` to O" N "C N fn a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • V _ ~ ~ 7 L CO E L ~ O O. O O O N y p _O C _ S C ~ ~ O N ~ - O ~ c6 ~ ~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~- ~~ ai N ~ U y 0= a 0 O c~ L O y~ „_,, ~ Q 'O U S N ~ c0 0 c~ ~ O C p ~ N~ L E N O L ~ 0 >+ C cif N C O ~ O ~_ ~ W ~~>~ L ~- V O C~~~ O ~ U ~~~ U L U 6 ~ ~ ~ . .. i CO O ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ (~ U C ~ .. ~ CSS ~ U N d Q) W ~ Q C~ O Q c~ _ _ N ~ N U O D & E- 92 ~~- ,- ~ , ~ ~=~ , ~ - L' • aY -_^ R ,~ p'$_a ~t= ~ f I ~ ~`r "_ ; ~ 3 ''E~ ^m 3 4 ~iV~ _ _Lf ~•-? iµ~ ~: ~ ~ ~~ a • ~ ~ ° U "r+,'t _ ~ ~fl t,. ~paf ~~C"~ " i' 3 ~F Y~ Q O Q ~~r~i a a a o ~~ ~~ ~ ~; p O O ~ '~ 4 ~YY'-.',di ~~~+r~ \~ o_ a a o o ~~~~ -~ i ~ _ N ~ ~ U ~ ~ 7 ~su~ rt ~k: ~ 0 0 0 0 `o u~~, p ~ ~ > ~ k±~M v L-. y L ~ [[ ~ ~ ~ 9r~~rs4} ~ p O ~ y~~r U TMr e~ 2,x`~~t ~ ~t ~ z' ~~r!,u r~ ~.~ - `a.'~4 U ~f~~ m m m p p ~ ,, t,~ -; U F: ~ ~~ ~~ s ~ ti a~ti~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ p ~'~°;1 ~ ~ ~ 0] ~ 0.. ,~ g2; m ~:~~ ~a~oo~mcm~m E L .._. ~~ a O L L aLo~ ~ E a~no of ~ O~~ O cnac ~ C c~ ocv>, .C C rr~~',~~ i~ tt~ ~ ~ .c ~ m ~ C O O O O t0 ~ ~ 4 ~ p ~ ~ o O ~ ... ~n - cn cif ~ f~ > O > >, a fn ~ ~ O L ~ 7 O ~,.~"~~ ~ ~ C..) ~ Q ~ _ c ~E~ca.rEo a~Cnwc-~' _ UU~ ° ~ oa~ ~ U ? ~'} o U ~ ~ ~ O O E ctS Q a O c6 C~ ~ c~ > >, »- a Q_ ~ C . :r ~ > m L C ~ _ E _ ~ _ C O ~ ..C ~ tV m ~ _p °- ~ L ~ rn ~co~ _ p c~ ~ L ~ N a a "J o o O >, O ~ v ~ ca _ " ~~, ' O ~ O Uo a m a. O I L ~i 7 i C~ ~ o p~~ C ~ _ mo ~ i E~ ` E U _, U~~ ~,° Q C ~ ~ 0 U i ~a m~ c al- ~ m~ o~ E o .n o.~ o ~ o ~ ~ E o U ~ ~ ~,,t,,: m~ c v ~ ~~ L c c p o C o E~~ Eo E c rn U o ~ B E N _° a m oar ,, ~ Q c U N Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ >; ~ _ C ~ .~ ~ a ~ E ~ O U ~ ~ 4o- t,~ , r~.a L U p a N ~ O a O O C ~ (~ C L Y '- a~ U 0 ~ c0 Q ~ L U c~ - i- "-' co O p O ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U O Cn 'C O O „uu4Kv ' w ~ >, ~ ~ ~ U C H 0 0 - ~~»=rooc m»r~ p o~ c~ L -o ccv~ U a~ ' aU0 ~ , y Kf ` = ,Q ~n~~n ~'a~ °E~oo°'~ ... o.=ca~ O O =moo ~ E cacoo Q~ ~~ ` r3 ~, , _•~ ~~E°'a > N C ~ O O U ~~ °a~ca~~~~oEc o~c~ ~O N i O O oa o "a (0 C >.°`~c ~ o~o_ , ' ~' T `r O O °'°-_ooca ~ .~ N O C O p to o~~>>>°-a~ro~~a~ U ~ i i ro~~o _ L - (6 ~, -c~~ p -mco ~~ EF- ~ ,rig- Q~ C7 O °"V~oo ~~ N U~~ E a L ~~ O. O CO C y "O C~ O C N N~ U " ~ c~ r _O - L C N d' rn p O = ~ ~ ~ ~ N > c4 a U ~ ~ ~ U O O a ~ O O O ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O a ~ U ` a ' ~ L N~ 0 7 ~ Q Q In O O O a~ p- E ' >' ='.~: N C a 0 U i >. ri7 O ~~ O Q ~ 7 C C rn O' O L ~ ~/7 U~ p C ~ ~ ris N rn .D U 7 O Q C " , ~, ° N O S N ~' ~ ~ > ~ °~- ~ ~ ° o-o ¢ a~ Ea ca o ~- ~U ~ ~; m rnU °~ r .? `~o ~ >,d~ rn ° o °~ Q° a°~ 'o~ t ~ U c • ~ • O • u ~ t- y~ • • r~ F ~t ~ ~f C~ ~' N ~ Y U U Q Q Q a a w ~ C O C O C i' O F~ ~ _ ~ ~ U U U O _ O ~ N ~ C D O C Q O ~ C Q O > > ~ ~ • U U U U U ^ g, ~s m m ,>. t ,'~ ~;' ~ _ 1, m m m m m cts ~~ O~ O N a~ C_ C ~co C O ~ >,-- ono ~~ ~ C c -av~~n~V-o a~~m ~ C N L C O L L 7 A E E -°~o° ~ - .cam ~ ac ' ~ ~~ c~~Q~~N ~ ~~~'c°~°EO~~~~a O ° °' ~ ' o p ~°m~ ~ _~ Q O o UU > cn c c Eo m ~~ c ` c S o ~ o ~°°a"ioE~°o o ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ d Cn N ~ ~ > ~ t N Q ~ ~ O "O Q. D_ 0.. _ N O ~ L` ~ ~ ~ - - ~ L a c~ i ~ ~ m O c~ p~ ~? ~ ~ Q .«. ~ c N L- O ~ N O >, .r O ~ .A ~ L ~'? ~~ ~s N ro 0.. U Q ~ ~ L `- ~ c~ a ~ cn N .~_ ~ U O -O L O- N ° ~ ~ U O C `' ~ to _~ .-• Q ~ U ~ O a N ~ ~ C ~ > '. ~'''~ U O ~ O ~ Cn ~ U to ~ t U -O O O N N_ i O" C ~ Q i O C C U Q. E L N ~ O ~ N ~ ~ O O to C 'O _ O O ~ ~" `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L O ~ ~ Op O ~ ~ ~ ~ U cn ~ O _~ L j~ N E B Q O ~ ~ ` _ O ~ ~ C~~- L~ ~ O) O- O~ O O O N O _ .O O RS L L ~ _ I+ ~ O) _ N U N O ~ C ..O (~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ O C~ c0 > N t~ C ~ N O ~ ~ f; L U O a~i ~~ ~ ~ > CO ~ N ~ C a' Q- V "~ ~ ~ C ~ N ~ t/J ~ O d L E ' ~ ~ ~ ~ V >, N ~ C O C j '~ ~ L ~ }i; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-' ~ p m O d O~ X _ Cd : 3 U ~ O ., p ~ "O N O O ~ y 0~ O L D c ° " ~`~N~c yam o ~~~ °° i w` ~~~a ~ ~~ o o,~' c~ ~°o~-o~w °m~ no°'~ c x o~ac~°~o o c U°o~ o.~ = Q O O~ U O_ U~ L o h to ga d ClSSt E ~~, O ~ m N C O U cn C N D -O O ciS -O U ~~~ U ~ ~ ~ CO E ~ ~ C O ~ O O ~ m L ~ ~ U U "-' '~ ~b A ~ ~ ~ ~ O O E O ~ O ~ ~ O ~ C -O ~- O Q C ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ C O ~ ' O cn C O Q O C ,~ ~ 'a N N ~ Q ~~! ~ D,~ to ~ w ' ~ L- N - tp E (E O O j ~ O C 'a w. C O~ C O- C~ R U C O ~ ~ m U ca ao ~~ ~~ ;~ ~~ °~ ~ m~ o m ~ ~ ion m o a~i ro c ~~ ~~_ LL cn N ~ O C3 cn » U ~ co ~ z aa, 2 ~ ~'4~ Q. ~n ~ ~ cn U ~ c Q p~ ~ O c`a W E ~ ~ Q O ~ ° ~ - O D & E - 94 • N N N ~ N ~ N a a a a a a n. Q a Q 0 0 0 0 0 ~ > ~ m > ~ ai > ~ ~ > ~ ~ a~ '> ~' U m O m ~ aci a`> L ~ U Q. C 7 N ~ O L to 'O ~ N ~ N N .~ O AL i O O O C Q ~ N E~nE ~ N '~ Y_ N ,_~ ~ ~ O O N O 7 _ ~ y ~ U CO i ~ C L O i ~ N L ~ +- _~ O Q O O i- U ~ ~ O ~m~ ~~ ~ C c -a ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U 00 O m ~, ~ o C O cQ O N ~ ~ ~ ~ O .~ C c a> E O O O - C Q.iA O N O ~ C O ~ ~ O- p O o ~» ,`J N L ~ O ~ w O O ~ O U a ~ ~ O O ~ ~ .O O c~ y L C = O U O ~ ~ t~ ~m~ ~ ~ ~ C C C i, ~ f0 N 7 O ~ 0 U CCS O_ U m w U c ~ c c ~ L O O N O U ~ O c c~ ~ u7 ~ ~ a c ~ ~a~~o~ N O_ C ~ X ~ L O N cLS O (SS E m ~ ~ U O N ~ C L C W ~ O O C ~ - p a~~>aa~ EmUa~~ Q. ~ U ~ O ~ C R3 ~ ~ U O 'p L - O i ~ (~ ~ O QU' Q N ~ ~ O ~ N ~ ~ O ~ C U L O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O d U m O m ~ i C O ,~ ~ c~ C N (D ~ ~ C..) m O to ~ ~'+ 0.. N O v~~~oLO~o ~ O ~ ~ > ~ U a 0 O- cn O p "O C O ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ O "O C cS3 L ~ 7 ~ _ O C L ~ ~J O O O ~ L N ~ ~ ~ = O .r - E_ -p O C~ O '~ O (n ~ -fl ~ CSS Q7 (A i > ~ ~- C~ C N ~ O C C6 > Q~-O~ N C >'~ c~ U ~ N p Q O" Q~ao~ ~ o~ ~a~~`"c~~Ec~ U- O C O 7 Cn ~ O N ~ O ~ ~ ~ C C ~ to O C_ ~ ~ J OU ~ .Q N ~ E ~ d U m w U L f~ N V O O C~ C L ~coc~~~~~~a a o c c o~~ ro o ~ O cCf ci3 ~ ~ O' X ~ > N O O N ~ C m ~ cti ~ ~ ~ O D_ - CTS "O ~ >+ 2f ~ ~ Q .-~ C ~ "_ _ CO ~ (SS '' O C C O ~ N c~ca~oEy~aE "a ~ cC _C ~ a~ ~ to ~ C6 ~ C d ~' N t~ ~ ~ ~ .nW~cc~Uvi~U p~ 0 0 0 ~ O U U O~~ f~ p~ O L "O- i.C U y CC C ~ N ~ N cn O~ O~ ~~ U ~ p `O ~ as ~ ~ Z CJ ~ tnQ~m +L-. QC ~ ~~ O • u ~ t- y5 • r~ f a'~(t. T~ 4 C 4 j ~ l fi E • fC~ ~~ yy V ~, :,'~ ` N '~,`~~~ r ~ ~' Q dr il~ ~ ~~ ~~ i :~ r ~ fS~ y~ ~fn ...~j i ~ .t } w~ ~~~ S ~4t !~ F , } "f r- g t~ ~~"-u ~~~ us t Cp„i^1 -~~a U a ~~ ;'f~~ r~ ~~~ Q Q Q ~ ~ C ° a w72 ~ a~°~ a K~ '~' o o a O °t3,t U U U N ~~Y j C j C '- C ~ ~:~~~ p ~ p ~ p ~ av ,•tt CN j ~ r~~ ~-x~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~~s~~ U ~C r, '~ t U .,x3 4 i~~15~1 os~~ fr fCU,. Ar wF ~ 'i' O 4i m m ~ ~+J 4yj I~t< i^° C ~_ C Cis ~ C CA >, ~ i~„~,` N N Cis O C R ?, C >, C C O >, O~ N ?. = ~ ~ ~ C C Q _~+ (V Q~ (v (v (U (v ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ O W ~ _~4x n ~ ~ O ~ Q o ~ ~ U ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~° ~ _ c~ cA ~ C W O~p~p ~ --' . a~ c~ O o ~ pL~~~~ ~-_ ca O N C ~ L~ O ~~ ~ ~,'" s U O O~ L U a. ~ c0 f~ C O (n 7 Q _ Rj a. ~ L Cry ~ O ~ O z z o ~ ~ ~ ~~-r '~ : II. O N ~ . ~ X ~ X y ~? L ~ ~ O t o .a cts -a m °' ~ y c a~ C Z ,~~, U~ 7 i 4~'„ j O Y Ct5 ~ cn ~~ N~ CO 7~~ to O U O ~ ~. L E: ~ C O ~ ~ " ~- * ~ ~ O > O co tti U ` U m O '~ > ,.~ ~ ~ O Q C (ll ~ O ~ ~ ~ O ~ (ll j ,i'.. ~ O C7 ?~ C C ~ U N ~ ~ Q O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f1. L 0~~~,~W_-~ ~ - -O Cn ~ O L ~ - ,',, _ ~ `~`~ ~ -O ~a~a~c`~~zT m~~CE o p ~ O rn ~ C ~ Cn ~ ~ O ~ ~m ~ "O O C N "~ ~ C C C~ ~, N ~l - Cn C~ Di ~ ~ _ C to U~ ~ to O~ C ~ C cts O m C C .. 7 ~ co 5 o ca - L cts a ca a ~ > ~ U O~~ m 0 0 0 F" C O _ ZT N N C „_, O - ~- C O C T CO ~- U (A ~ ~~ O O ~ C E p U E o E ,; l c~ ~ ~~ L ~ O O .~ ~~ ~ O~~ U .« _ Q _ _ ~ ~ O W ~ U O U a = - ~ O ~ -a O (ll C C (~ CSS O OR L ~ C L ~ ~ ~ O ~ p ` ~ C C O y ~. O ."`_ O y~ U = O O C~ p _ ~~~ i L "'' ~ '-' ~ O O N pi U O O a~ O O ~ L ~ ~ o ~ C - O C ~ O C = C ~ ~- cn O -~ iA = ~'i4 ~ ~ ~ ~ to C O ~ (T ~ C (lS 3 Cb ~ CiS .~. CC ' yaN ~ fll O O- O'O m"O.._."p i (ll to O-O ~~ ~ O~~ (ll 7 O 0- to OpU~ O~cz]U 'O t Z O p U~ U C ~ C _ O L ~ (ll ~ C~ O H O N~~ U in.~-p CU a t~nN i ~ c Ei N S? IL ~ . . n n n - O D & E- 96 ;~- .~, . G=" ~ s~ ~ A y,~, f ~~ ~ [ „~~ ~ P a,r; ~ . -t; Sy aA~ _ 4 ~ t L 5f'~Ih ;~ ~r~i~ F a; E s~ ~ ,~ r,-~ VM e ~ " ~ ,~+~.~ aF ~ Gl~'t'~ ~ I +i~~ryr i t~~~~ 1' t ~a~~y , °a ~ k?k~~ fa r uti~~Y ~ Q ~iy ~i~~ ~~~~i L f'" ' ,~ 4 ~'~~~'"; C p ~~;klr u°M i ° ~LfY U i ~ d~? sF a ~~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ "h ` Br ~~~,~ i` 7 C v~'~d~ t'~ M7 r,:~~ x -~' ~i~'w~ ~ip~{fir it'~~F r~ ~ ~15}~7Y ~ n ~ ~~! 1 ~e ~~ 7 " +` x rt~^~ C s ~ r ~ s q~'-S"~~r iN ~~t '~~ i ~ ~ m \ " ~~?~ ~ ,_ E ~ ~ d ~r '~~~~ ~" N Uj (0 `- O - A to N (~ ~Adt`~tt h C W ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ c~ ~ c~ ~ .~a~ ~'~~ C ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ cn .D O ~ ~ y .~ 'a ~ ~~ ~ ~QC~.-. C ~ O C 7 -Y ~ O O C -, s ~ O ~ O 'O ~ ~ ~ ~ r4~~ A~ C C ~ O ?.~ O O L - ti'~~ ~ Q ~ ~ O , Y~nwh'; ~ C N c~ O Y ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ("~ ~5 p ~p C j, C~ ~ O~ C r U, ~ 'p ;.~ _ Cd ~ ~ p O C ~ ~ ~ to ~ ~i .~ c~ L ,_, r o ~ E ~ ~ .UJ ~ o o ' ~ ~ ~ a i ~ ;~~, O Q~¢ U~ y U~~ ;;~ C c 0 O O 1..~ _ C ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ -O ~ U ~ -p ~ ~ ao Uj - ~ ~ C ~ c r ~ ~ ~ ~ O tq CSS Li: ~~~' ~ O C C c _ ~ ~ c .~ c u a ~ ~ cOn ~ .~',' F_ '`' ~ a ~ E > U . 1 ~ O ~ <<," ~Ni ~ ~ ~ m ~ fQ a ~ ~, ~ 9 O c ro o a 1 '~ O i O ~ O m S .., s m ro ~ 3 " ~ m ~ m ~ O , . v " ' OC -o C'3 a U -a ~ n ~ . D U ~ { O ~ p o O' s s r c a _ +r i ~_ ~ ~_ oa ro > ro y 7S~ y .-- N Ch a' ~ CO I~ 15r~ ve ~ ~ t - ~rf ~ :u ~ ~~ d t y } ~ ~ il ~ i .! ,~w_ O a ~ O N,00 ~j ¢ a~i ~>, ~_ ~ y ~F~ ,,U+; C C C ~ . t7 O N ~ ~ ~ ~ U Y 7 ~,0, 'Ci ~ Q U m ` ~ ~ ro y~, O O ~ to 7b~~fi 47? ? r ; C t , a Q7 S! t O O C .nC n N C U +'~ ~ ~ '~ ~ O y'LT+ D c e~"d p° ~ O C J1.r a~ Z ~ U o ~ _; ~ o U ? ~ a m °o t w F°- ~' o m = ~ o ° ~ a , Oz ~ ~ ~ O O r r;~ ~ Q ~] U D w .s N N m . ~` m ~ 'gy O O e-~ D ~ . C c m ~ ~ C N ' n ~ m C ,~, ~ . m ~ ~ ~ ¢~ t i,N r N ~ O o N -o o "O C m -~ p U O c0 O N '"~. D D w 0 0 U C O a~ Q y V U _O a d Y U O c~ C Lf O Q~ Y U E E c~4 m i C c C C ccf • • O D & E- 97 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT # TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBPTM17343 SUBJECT• TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT JONES CONVEY GROUP LOCATION• SOUTHSIDE OF WILSON AVENUE, WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE -APN 0201-182-28 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at Its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-08, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be Included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties involved In the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Negative Declaration - $ 1,850 B. Time Limits This tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map Is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval • SC-1-05 Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17343StdCond 2-28 doc D & E- 98 Project No SUBTPM17343 Completion Date C. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ • site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance 7 Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map • 8 All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/ including proper illumination 9 A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed _/_/_ control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements a Local Feeder Trails (i e ,private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced _/_/_ with two-rail, 4-inch lodgepole "peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement, however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material b Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as _/_/_ veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs c Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0 5% at the downstream end of a trail fora _/_/_ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official d Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard Grade access from corral to trail _/_/_ with a maximum slope of 5 1 and a minimum width of 10 feet e For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at _/_/_ least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing • 2 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17343StdCond 2-28 doc D & E- 99 Protect No SUBTPM17343 10 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met individual lot • owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs 11 The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes 12 All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits 13 Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter 14 Construct block walls between homes (i a ,along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency 15 Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC • 16 For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry 17 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property 18 Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real aver rock Other stone veneers may be manufactured ~I products I D. Shopping Centers Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 2 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours E. Building Design 1 For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street Provide Interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB) Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and • Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of building permits I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17343StdCond 2-28 doc Completion Date -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- D & E -100 Protect No SUBTPM17343 Completion Date F. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and Irrigation plan, Including slope planting and model home landscaping in _/_/_• the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the Issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision 2 Ali private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet In vertical height and of 2 1 or greater _/_/_ slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover In addition, slope banks In excess of 8 feet In vertical height and 2 1 or greater slope shall also Include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq ft of slope area Trees and shrubs shall be planted In staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane Slope planting required by this section shall Include a permanent Irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy 3 For single-family residential development, all slope planting and Irrigation shall be continuously _/_/_ maintained In a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an Inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are In satisfactory condition 4 Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and Irrigation shall be required per the Development _/_/_ Code This requirement shall be In addition to the required street trees and slope planting 5 The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be Included in _/_/_ the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department 6 All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the _/_/_ design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department • G. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the project The applicant is responsible for the cost of _/_/_ implementing said measures, Including monitoring and reporting Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director In the amount of $ 538 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures These funds may be used by the Clty to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit H. Other Agencies 1 The applicant shall contact the U S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location _/_/_ of mailboxes Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits • 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17343StdCond 2-28 doc D & E-101 Protect No SUBTPM17343 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, ~R COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans Including the following a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) Including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, Including Isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and Planning Department Protect Number (SUBTPM17343) clearly Identified on the outside of all plans Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls All sheets must be marked NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION J. 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and Clty licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit Issuance 4 Developers wishing to participate In the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for Information and submittal requirements Site Development Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the project file number (SUBTPM17343) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts • 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to Issuance of building permits I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17343StdCond 2-28 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-/~ -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- -/_/. -/-/- D & E-102 Project No SUBTPM17343 Completion Date 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays K. New Structures 1 Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations 3 Roofing material shall be Installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions L. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be In substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the Issuance of building permits 5 A separate grading plan check submittal is required for ail new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer M. Additional Requirements/Comments Note on title sheet that plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to construction The application shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department is you have any questions about the procedure at (909) 477-2710 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS• N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, communitytralls, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline) 52 total feet on Wilson Avenue 6 -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- • -/-/- -/-/. -/-~ -/-/- • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17343StdCond 2-28 doc D & E-103 Protect No SUBTPM17343 • O • 3 Corner property Ilne cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development 3 Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to Street Name Curb & Gutter A C Pvmt Side- walk Drroe Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Wlison Avenue X X X X X X (g) Tamarind Avenue X X X X X X (e)(f) Cabrosa Place X X X X X X Notes (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this Item (e) Cul-de-sac (f) Curbside drain outlet (g) ADA access ramps Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer • 7 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17343StdCond 2-28 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- D & E-104 Protect No SUBTPM17343 Completion Date Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of Intersections per City Standards or as directed by the Clty Engineer Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check 5 Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be Installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program 6 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street Improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line Item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The Clty Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional Information, contact the Project Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty Cabrosa Place Lagerstoemia mdica Crape Myrtle Hybrid 3 ft 20 ft o c 24-inch box Fill-in "Natchez" White Tamarind Drive Sophora iaponica Japanese Pagoda Tree 5 ft 30 ft o c 15-gal Wilson Avenue P A less than 8 ft Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrd - 3 ft 20 ft o c 24-inch box "Muskogee" Lavender P A 8 ft or greater Cinnamomum camphora Cam hor Tree 8 ft 30 ft o c 15-gal Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) Ali street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City Inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backflll soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector 3) All street trees are subfect to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only 8 -~-~- C -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~ ~_ • C7 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17343StdCond 2-28 doc D & E-105 Protect No SUBTPM17343 7 Intersection Ilne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project • intersections, including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required P. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Wilson AVP.I'tI1P. trail 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City Q. Drainage and Flood Control A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer Improvement Completion 1 If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the Clty will be required for All public improvements S. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been Issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects • 9 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17343StdCond 2-28 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-~- -/-~. -/-/- D & E-106 Project No SUBTPM17343 Completion Date 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map well be subject to any requirements that may be received from them T. General Requirements and Approvals 1 Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the Clty, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map Is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES, AT (909) 477-2770 FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SEE ATTACHED -~-~- • -~-~- • C~ 10 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM17343StdCond 2 28 doc D & E-107 •~a - ~,~o,~oR. ~ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District • f d s ~~~~~~~~~ ~` Fire Construction Services t `t' STANDARD CONDITIONS June 8, 2005 Randy Davis Tract 17343 (4) Parcel Map Subdivision SUBTPM17343 and DRC2005-00443 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spaang and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is • 500 feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200 feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways ii At intersections iii On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire Distract v A minimum of 40 feet from any building FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this project is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances D & E-108 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow • 3 Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed protect site FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 1 All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) 2 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 • 1 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20 feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46 feet d The minimum radius for cut-de-sacs is 45 feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches f At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shalt not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 2 D & E-109 ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus • 2 Residential ates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in g accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20 minutes and shall automatically reset 3 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site • plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits. 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped • 3 D & E-110 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of • the protect Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet, 6 inches above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" • PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Access Roadways Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services • 4 D & E-111 The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the • required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 4 Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry • • 5 D & E-112 . RESOLUTION NO 07-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2005-00443, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT DEPTH STANDARD TO LESS THAN 200 FEET IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 TO 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE, WEST OF SYCAMORE COURT, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 0201-182-28 A Recitals 1 Jones Covey Group filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2005-00443, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 28th day of February 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred • B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth m the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 28, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application is related to Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17434 which applies to a parcel of about 130,240 square feet (2 99 acres) within the Very Low Residential District, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue, and b The subject property is an L-shaped parcel about 300 feet east-west by about 450 feet north-south The subject site is vacant and is generally characterized by relatively large, overgrown shrub and grasses, and c The application contemplates the reduction in the lot depth of Lot 1 of SUBTPM17343 from 200 feet to 165 feet, and d Lot 1 will comply with all of the City's Basic Development standards except depth, and • e Lots 2, 3, and 4 will comply with all of the City's Basic Development standards for lot dimensions including area, depth, and width, and D & E-113 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-09 VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 2 f The applicant has not submitted any applications to develop the site Any proposals for a subdivision and construction of residential structures on these parcels will be subject to review and action by the Planning Commission or the Planning Director at a later date -these parcels will remain vacant until then, and g All lots will have direct access to a public right-of-way Lots 1 and 2 will have access to an extension of Tamarind Court while Lots 3 and 4 will have access to an extension of Cabrosa Place 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code The depth of Lot 1 is restricted by the alignment of Tamarind Court and a vacant parcel immediately to the south Shifting the alignment of the proposed street northward is not possible as it is an extension of an existing segment entering the site from Tract 16237 to the east Note that the design of the cul-de-sac is a modification to the City's standards that was made to allow Lot 1 to be as deep as possible, utilizing the standard design would have caused Lot 1 to be only about 150 feet deep, and :~ b There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to • the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the Very Low Residential District The overall project is an "in-fill" project surrounded by properties that were subdivided (or the application to subdivide was submitted) prior to the adoption of the ordinance requiring a minimum lot depth of 200 feet in late 2001 As a result, the lots immediately surrounding the subject site, excepting the two southernmost lots of the tract to the east, are about 160 to 180 feet in depth, and c The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the Low Residential District The applicant would be required to significantly alter the proposed design parcel map to comply with this regulation The only alternative that exists would be to eliminate Lot 1 altogether, and d The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege because there are unique site conditions The project site is surrounded by developed parcels, flexibility on the design of Tamarind Avenue is restricted by technical requirements, and there are no practical alternatives, i e the lot depth of Lot 1 cannot be increased by reducing the number of lots or decreasing the size of one of the other lots, and e The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity because the project has been designed to take into account the orientation of neighboring lots, the locations of structures on these lots, and the grade differences that exist between the subject property and the adjacent lots The characteristics of the surrounding neighborhood will be preserved . D & E-114 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-09 VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 3 4 Based upon the facts and information contained m the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto and incorporated herein by the reference, based upon the finding as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the protect Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the protect would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared ~n compliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the Independent tudgment and analysis of the • Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during protect implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the protect d Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711 4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753 5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed protect will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources orthe habitat upon which the wildlife depends This is supported by the fact that the site is presently developed with asingle-family home, has walls surrounding the entire lot and is surrounded by existing development on all sides Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753 5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753 5 ) e The custodian of records for the initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below D & E-115 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-09 VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 4 Planning Department 1) The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition 2) The Variance approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2007 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of February 2007, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS NOES COMMISSIONERS ABSENT COMMISSIONERS • • • D & E-116 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-0443 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081 6 of the Public Resources Code) Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements 1 Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project 2 A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported • 3 The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program Program Management -The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant 2 A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measur2 identified m the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address City of Rancho Cucamonga -Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 D & E-117 Mitigation Monitoring Program TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM17343 AND VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 Page 2 • 3 Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner 4 The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development 5 All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form 6 Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel 7 The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring The protect planner or responsible City department has the authority to • hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented 8 Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time 9 In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits • D & E-118 • • • a H J a z c ~- _~ J U 2 U Z O Z O f~ O Q W a N N cC ~ ~ ~~. a o W Z Z a J a dM" W O e~r 2 Q !n ~ W M r a ~, t-- ~ m ~ Q. 0 ~ z a ~ ~ _ ~ LL ,~ V N ~ ~ a ~ ~~ ~ m ~-~ a ,,~ r_ ' • • l' ~ ~ N N N N N N ~Y .r ~ 4~ 7;; ~ • +. ,' U a U U a U a U a U a ''`' !n ~ fn ~ y y Cn In ~ ~ ~ ro ~~::- a __ o 0 0 0 0 0 ~~~ B ~_, ~:,,.~ ;~~ - k ~;: ~. • U U U m U U ~.rv c` O r`% _. m ~ U ~ ~ m m m m n . ~y O ~ ~_~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ O ~ ~ cc "" ~ ~ ~ U ' ~ N T G .~ III ~- m°-c~~o ° ~ -~~~~~~oLC~ a L>>, ~.n In u ° ~ ~ { c ° ~ ~ C " ~;~ te- O ~ >,U o o L ~ _ C U ( O ~ C CO O ~C C C O E ~ ~j.,_.~ CC -O `-' O N C C .C O~ ~~ ~ O U IO E C >' O O U C ~ ~ (~ ~ (ll Q U ~ ~ ~ V Iq (n ~ C G Q ~ L O _ Q ~.~ °r ~ O ~ i ~ ~ O ~ f1 O O a ~ U ~ >+ ~ O ~" `` ~'In~cc ~ cmOO Q ~~o~al°'~Inc ~ ~~ ~ ~oc~ c c Oc ~vlalln...U O alQaRSCInc~al ~al~ moo O Lo o ~~ CO > ^ ~ (C i U 0 C C (n O> U In N '~-- C O L N X _ +r ~ In ¢ O ''~~° ~¢'^ E~'~'oal~ iZ O L f1 IC o~~`o~InUal~in O O IC O~~ iC-O"CN i N y o~ E ° Q ('~ O- ~c C CC C c0 U iZ m (C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ O C ~ ~ ~ O O O ` ~ 16 In ~ "O O f2 N ~ N ~ ~ O m ~t C O ~ ~ C ~ _ N 'Z3 c C N 'O ~ . . ~ C ~ C O ton N U "= C 'D cC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' .~ r p C O L 7 OU U ~ O > _ N O L ~- O L ~~ c~ O tl ~ "r ~ C O `- C y c~ O ~ O 0 ICU L Q C C~ ~ ~ o tLn O In g , ~- ~""'_' ~ 7 ~ CC C ~~.. ~ C ~ O O ~ O E: O~ (D ~ C U ~_ ~ L "O U C ~ O ~ y- 0 4i N U "O C (C C O y U CC ~ U N O O ~ ` ~ L ~ ~ O ~ C p C L CC C E CC U Q O N y i O ».. L CC E `~ O L C + ., y d' Cn O O ~ ~, O cC ~ a ~ - O U T N L O !n ~ ~ ~ c in N a. O ,~ > ~ ~ 'p N O p IiI ~ tll ~ ~ L ~ L ~"~ CU 7~ CTS - !Z E ZS aI L O Q O O O Q to > O~ ~ C O CC IC - L i 0 E~ O O d y aU O O~ B U ~ L i - (U IC _O ~ Q CC U -_ ~ U , d L Q C Q~ ~ ^ D & E-119 0 N N N V ~ ~ ~ d' d' d' N ' a a a Q Q Q Q Q Q a s y y N ~ to ~ CTS _ O_ • IO _ O_ CZS _ O_ (IS _ Q C O C O C O C O C O _ (C Q c0 Q N ~ O ~ O N U m~ U C.T i U O ~.`. V ~ ~ U O O O _ > > _ > > C~ L C~ C~ C C~ C y N N O O O O C O O L C 7 0 O O L C 7 0 C O O Cll O ~ ~ ~ ~ D U ~ U D U D U D U fl ~ U U U U U U U U U U U O O O O O O O O O O O m m m m m m m m m m m fll ~ ~ ~ ' C 'O 7 "O U~ 0 L~ ' L O to ~ O ! ~ p C~ O C j 0 -O C O C O "" C Ct3 ~ Y ~ O D ~ C O ~ L ~ O ~ ca ~- ~ L to O cn O ~ ~ cis ~ N ~ L O ~ fn 'O p ~ C N p (~ U - Q fll ~ cts >, .C ~ O ~ V C p O L lT p (ll fll O L ~ 0 p O .« U N L .fl O i6 ~ t ~ >, " - O ~ ~ "-' Cn (ZY O to fll •~ O ~ 2i -p O N ~ CC O ~ O 'O cn G C ~ O U C~ C O .... fll ~ .Q ~ ~ ~. O Cll ~ -O O U O (ll cts _ O ~ ~ O ~ O_ L ~ " >, ~ L co cts ~ Q O O U U ~ U ~ C ~ 0 0 ~ Q O O~ ~ 7~~ (n rt+ L V O ~ ~ O -O O ~ Cn fll i > O O ~ C U o ~ ~ C ~ cn o ~ o o ~ c ~ °'c O L i~ Q m >....~ ~ N~ ~ ~ Cn O_ ~ O~ N c~ a U U Q O 0 ~ i .Q N j c~O U Cn C ~ (SS _~ ~ to C ~ C N ~ O) C O C > 0 co ~ ~ Q N E ~ O ~ ~_ ~ UJ ~ j~ fA O ctf 7~ p fll ' >, ~ ~ N ~ ~'a N 'O L O ~ "O O t C ~ ON U ~ C ~ ~ ,.., ~~'--'V O QOM ct3 ~ ~ 3 O ~ O C O ~ O O U _O ~ ~ .`_. O Cll ~ cls ~ ~ ~ O "a 'd ~ ~ ~ -p fll > `- ~ 0 U U... ~ C O O N L L O y - ~ (~ O U O -O O U Q L U U p O o - L C O N ~' -° ° (v O- L _O O O -p > O L ~ QS ~ -, to " 0 U -° C A E o Q > a > O ~ o O N °- o U _ ~, a U c~ - O O O E: m p> o m o N L U ~ a O Q O C o ~ p c~ U O ~ O ~ C "-' ~ > to ~_ U ~ ~ ~' LO ~ 3 O U ~ C ~ O U Q O ~ N N ~ O C O O ~ ~ ~ O O > to ct X p~ ai cts ~ O Q ~ -O O O X 'O O O O O H U C ~ L >, C L~ CIS O O ,,_ ~~ ~ E O N C U Cn O O Cn -~~ s - t O O~ U ctS O L ~ p CA O _ O ~` O (Lf fll y U~ ~ U O ~ 'O N cB Y~ C U ~ >+ L am= ~ z N O L L o_ ~ N U 7 O O O L L O O~ ~ y Q ~ "O N Q O ~ O .`r O C O Q Q O ~~~ C 0 0) 7~ to ~~ .`. O C A N > ISS ~ ~ L L Q Y O U ~- ~ Q1 ~ ~ ~ O ~ 2 .. -p Q ~ C U _ ~ ~ ~ N C ~ ~ N ~ U m L ~- ~ N C ~ O Ili O U ~ d O X Cn O ~ U C ~ cC O i >, O Cn n ~ F- U Cn ~ UJ Cd ~ ~ t Cn '- ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ 7 U C Cn . N ~ Cll N ~ O ~ ^ ~ ~ to ~ ~ U ~ cts ~ ~ co ~ ~U U • O • N D & E-120 • • ., \ N N C 7 CJ i j (J (+~~ ' ° ° U U a a a a a to C fn C ~, ~ O i O ~ O ~ O ~ O ~ a co a - a m a a~ a m a ~ a a~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ a a m ~ ~ a i i i a i > ~ > ~ > > > > > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U U U U U U U m m m m • O O ~ p p p p m m ~ ~ ~ ~ a. O~~ L~~ N O~ L C O= C~ tv ~~ O O L N C O 0 0 "= O~ O ? fQ "O O Q ~~ 6 CJ a L >+ "" C N O~~ c~ = U N ~ O f0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O t~ ~~ L L t0 y -C ~ N d i ~ 0 N O ~' O O ~i ~ L C ~ Q 7 U E CSS ~ Q 'C O U E to ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ C Q C c~ ~ p ~ ' L ~ - LO OU ~ -O ~ ~ O ~ ~ OLO cn 0 0 (0 to N C 7 O ~ O~ U O~ C a rn C E O O ~ ~ . -. O ~ C ~- ~ O Q . L C O_ ~~ C "O ~~ O >' ~ O~ ~ O O O~ O 7 O ~~ ~ ~ a O ~ c0 -y O t~ O ~a_~ca ~~ _ o~~sU m~~ o`~~ ~ cam~~a ~a~~n.o~ tn~ui tna ~_°'E~a~~ c °'y o o~U ago N~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q° ~ "'~mc ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~~ o>~ o O~ "' ~ toy o ~ ~~ _ L c E: to ~'~ c aU N 7 N C m~ ~~ L L _~ ~ O~ y O O L i o_ Q O N O p cn ~ C y y O C CN .~ Q. c O >> N~ a7 "-' > t 0 ~ S O D O O N L O O O p ~ 0 0~ "- L O C ~ C rt~ / ~ L L O LL ~ C >> O ~ t~ ~~ ~ ~~./ `~ ~ w. ~"' ~ j (n C ~ O ~ O Q ~~ O c~ a7 O O U f0 ~ -p 0 0 -O O ~ C O O ~~ 7 7 .C ~~ ,.. O O C V L U~ ~ O .«- p U U 0 C -O fl.. ~ Q i Q~ _A U ~ co ~' U ~ ~ O > ~ ~ p C Q ~ C -C i cd Q O tSS O p "" c~ C O C O _ ~~~ O O~ to ~ O ~ O O .O Y O C Q ~ U S N C B U j U ~ p ~ O ~ N C U ~ O ~ N «3 C O cd ~ O- O . L L ~ ~ ~ : _ O ~ ~ C O ~ N ~ ~ p ~ O U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O C~ ..._ C O~ .r ~ ~ ~~ fC O y ~ O ~-- O C~ 0 0 O~ a 0 O ~ ~ O p 0 0 C N N tv ~= 0~ C ~ O c0 ~ O fn ~ ~ _ ~ O O ~ ~ Q ~ tll E j ~ p ~ ~ vl L ~ c~ ~ p ~ c~ > Q d ~ L ~ ~ ~ N C ~ N O L ~ ?. C tD N ~ ~ .-. O C O c6 ~ y U C .... C O > O U N O ` L 7 i 0 ~ ~ ~ O N~ ~ V t , O~~ C~ ~ ~ O c~ ~' O ~ .~ O C ct3 O > tnL N W to ~ c~ U ~ ~ y ~ c~ ~ U N a ~ d ~ ~ c~ O Q c~ O N ~ L _ ~ O Q ~ 7 U _ U_ C O U O i '- O i t0 i1 c~ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ O M D & E-121 l YF t S `. 1 • ! • ~~ ~~. riv 1. Iy 5 sy?+` ! ' a s a o o ~~uv5,; Q -~ ~ ~`~~_ a a a a a `+ m a~ ~ a~ a~ r"z~~~ ~~ c o 0 0 0 0 0 -~-' _ U O N O N N ~`{° ~-'~` ~` O O O N O 7 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D U r~ rn r ~~i , , _x U , ~`r~`t ' m m m D ~ -- U "h x~ a'iX>i , , ~ iG1a~4 ` • v ~ ~Ya~. ^~^ ~ LL ^~^ LL M~M W ^~^ I..L ^~^ LL ~~~~f ~ 1, ~~~, 77p MQry~ W O L O~~ 'O O L O L ~ "r O N C O ,~ ~ `~ ~ O O~ C C (6 O O H L C a „ ~, 1~;~ ~ pj ~ C C p~ O O~ CO Q O U_ O N>)~~ O _ C O A t ~~ O~ ~ °O~ooE~Q--° ~ o m~'E~ ~ ~~ o~~~>>,~ ~aa~ U ~~ srck} ~~~a~ i c a o ~~o_~ °~wEctscvm ~ ~o _ U c -oo ~~co ~ ~ ° _oo °E ' t~'t o ~ -~~m c ~ ~ ~~ a~ ~ ~ m ~ m o o.Q ~ L c~ -~ . = ~ p v ~ ~ o ° c Q~ .,_, o c~ - ~ c o o .n E o ca ~ o y E o ° ~ E o ~ aE U u, o ~, ''~,,,, ~ ~ -a m~ ° a ° O ~ ~~ °"" ~ ~ ~ O O C ~ o EB ~ E O ~ c ~n c> o E ~ ~ ~ O ~ E a~i O ~ ~ -°pp O ~, ; i~~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ U C ~ O p "O O O C~~ C L ~ y. i -p i U O O Q~ ,L., U f~ i ~ >~ O- p O > N "_ O t L C~ (~ ~ U C QJ ~- O O ~~ to C (~ ~ L - ~ ~ .C ~ ~ ~ O ~~ • ~~ O ~ ~ O ~° O C U >` 'C "- O c~ C p 7 `~ O i ~ ` O o- 5, ~ ~ ~ Q O ~~~ N Q E O O O N 6 "~ N O +_. C '. ~ O~ O C O E 7 ` 0 0 0 ~ 0~ C c~ C Q a ~ U O ~~ ~ C _ O , L ~ .~ O C- U CAC m ca ~ ~ a~ O o ~ > ~ ~ - L ro ~ u~ m L - ~.. C ~, ~ o ~ c~ =~ cca ° c i Et-- ~ ~ C'7 O ~ ~~0 0 a~ i O U N U N E Q- L= C E ' Q O p~ ~ "O 7 .... O C c O N U E (~ O 'O '7 to - [q ~ C C- N~ c9 E O ~ O U O ~ p~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ E 0 0 ~ CA ~ (/~ ; ' ~ U N~ ~ (0 O C .-. O E O ~~'~°-°"Ea°iN°'~E ~- L cac°o ~~ O ..~.. U --°o~L~°' c~- N U S 'O c`~°a~c`~ O •~- E 'rE°° ~, ,, "~ L~~ v~~°~m Q~ ~ ~ o~ ~ ~ c~ ~o ~ O Q ~ C ~ CAaE c ~ ~ ~ j . . c ~ o-a ~ y U ~ ~ ~ Q-a ~, c ~ ~ E c~ ,,N ~ O Q 7 R~~ m c ~ Q N ~ ~ ~, ~ _O U O C = N in O - U y ~ Q ~ Q O E ~ ~ UJ O N - CA U c~ O ~ ~ ..r CO O Cn U U ~ ~ ~ ` to U ], ~ Q ' O ~ ~ O O ~ ..C Q O Q N - o O - - N' O L - C3 ..C ~ ~ (~ C .~-- ~Ua~~EcOy~ C3 ~v~~Cn~ 0 • • D & E-122 • • "~ ~~ F,, ~ , ~° , ~_. ~~'' ~ 4 ~; ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ t~~::. , ai N N t! , ti~ r ~ ~~1 ~ r ` n f 8,~:r' a- - ~ U U Q Q Q . ~~~ a a ~, = , C C C 0 C 0 C 0 `~~' ~ Q n. ' 0 0 D - U D U D U i au~ ~ CC ~:~-' ~~ '~ a • 4 a~ ~ ~ ~ 0 4 ~ U U U m m • .,,'+~ 4.-. :: f;l i ~ ~ ~ O ~ O O O ~ ~ ~ m m m O ~ O O ~ O (~ ~ O ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O C "O N ~ ~ ~ ~ O ^O ~ U ~ ~ - >~ ~j U ~ U O ~ a--~ ~ O ~ ° > ~ ~ ~ ~ U - O ~ O p N ~ ~ O Q~ y "O ~ 'O Q~ ~ ~~~ cts c0 p p ~ U ~ O C O ~ ~ in ~ ~ ' ~ - ~ 0.. ~ >, -p cn ~ O ~ O co y ~ U Q ~ C O Q OU ~ "' L O ~° C~ C` Q OU O - ~ ' (~ d ~ ~ E: O~ m f ~ ~ ",-' d - C C O) ~ C O O C O O C "O p N O O E ~° 0 0 ~ U ~ C m -° U cn „-~ - o `m a~ ~ ~ ~ ao~ c~~~-'= cam QC'a Q° U C ten' >,~ o a°i'~~ ~ ° E c`ts a~~v~i °'°~ ~U os ~ .-~ ~ ~ m N -n ~~ ~ ~>> ao 7 U a° °~ o-o ~ m c Q~ 'n ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ U O = ~ ~ ~ Q -~ ~ ~ O ,n~, ., ~ O ~ „_' Cn ~ U to ~ ~ ~ ~ O Q L. ~ C C U ~ E L N O L N U~ N _C 'O - O (~ a.. ~~ ~ ~ STS C a ~~O. O~ (n ~ _0 C_ C_ 7[ 0 7 0 ~ ~_ ~ O "O > O E _N Q O ~ ~ ~ ` ` ~ N "= d. C ~ ~ cif ~ 7 ~ ~ - O ~ (n C O ~ O Q ~ c0 ~ >, L Q ~ O Q - O ~ " O ~ ~ d .~'~, a~. Rj `t O- "- N ` U ~ ~ ~ ~ O p U ~ C ~ N - ,= O C ~ >, cif c~ O ~ N ~ ~ 0 t~ ~ C C ~ -p E cn -a ~ a~ ~ ac°u "~ ,fir ~ ~'c ~ m a~i ~ ~" ~ a~i ~ ° ° C ~ °- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i0 > t C ~ ~ .~ N C tN a ~~ O ~] ~ ~ C "" O O O ~ U E C ~ N .~- ~ .~, ~ i ~ U ~ U ~ C O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d r~ ° ~ ~ C O O O = .O O O O n Q ~ ? O ~ -O ~ O ~ O ~ ~ C ~ ~ N ~ ~ O N O ~~ ~ N ~ m 7 C ~ itf O ~ C O ~ rn ~ ~ ~ O p" ~ ~ 7 O X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ C ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ O ~ O • ~ U U t. N ~ ~ O cn ~ >+ ~ ~ ~ C Q to of O ~ ctf O ~ 'D cn ~ C C ° ~ o "O ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ U ° U c~ ~ ~~~ - - N ~ `o ~ - in E ~ ~ O C O O ~ _ "" ~ _ C ~ ~ C W -p v~ ~ cif ~ >' ~ ° ~ ~ lL to N cn O (~ ~ ~ U ~ ctf ~ ° g 2 c W ~ ~ O ~ _ ~ Q U W ~ Q ~ 2 O } ~F^ to cn U O c6 tT Za O i U O D & E-123 N N N N N ' a a a a a fn (n fn In N RS ca (~ ca (a d O_ Q Q d O O O O O N N ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ U U U U U m m m m m . . m m m U U `~ aci a~ a~ ~ m o ~ ~~ o o o ~ ° o ca o °' ~_~ ~ ai ° ~~ m~ C > ~ '.' ~ N to ~ "d _ O 'D U X 0 ~ i ~ O ~_ ~ (a ~ N ~ C ~ U ~ O ~ a 0 0 ~ C N c U Q C m ~ .~ ~ 0 c0 m £ ~~ C ..`r c°-~'~ 0 m U~ C O Q ov~a~~~~m ~ R c °- ~a ca caca~~ p~0 ~ °~-' ~ E ~ ~U > ~~ ° ° c c o c `ag m _ a w o m - _ p o ° a~ ~ ° o o~ c ~ ~ aria E ~~ ~ ~ o>~ ~ ~ i o ~ a~i v ~~~ EN a E E ~ ° ~~ >, O pc ° O -o m ~~~ ~ --. c ca 0 ~ ~~~~ ~ c ca c .n w ~n..,~cm - ~-~ caw ca o ~ c a~ C 7 O U~ O w 7 C a7J O N~ U~ O O ~ O~~ O~ 0 C Q E O E N O- .r O ~ O C ~ - O ~ N O> Q O N ~ ~ ~ C O ~-. ~ O ~ N ~ ~ O ~ O - cn O ~ Q L 0 0 ..- C ° > c o ~ ~ ~ o E (a C -a o ~ ~Y~ _ p.'_ o ~~ ~: a~ ~ v i Q ~ cn~ c ca ~ ~ ~ E~ c ~ ~~ c ~ ~ cn U c a> ~ -a mca c~ ma cn ca ~ ~ O O ~ "O ~ ~ O O ~ N ~ O C ~ O- ~ O C ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ o a~ ~ o ~ ~ o ~ >,~ o~ ~ ~ ~ o~ ro ~ ~w ~ c ~ ~O ccn mU _ U ca L ~. ~ i~ N U Q~ O ~ O L `= O ~ U ca U CO ~ ca "O O -p U U~ O Q O 'd C S C '- O ~_ O~ O C~ ~~ O N ~ ~ O Q -O U N ~~ ~ O _ ~ .D O N ~ O Q p O Q O ~ U Ca ~ 3 d ' ~~ -_ ~~ ~ p C C ~ ~ " C O "- _ O ~ O C =_ O U O ? 7 to Q N O N ~ a p- cn Ca O) ~ C Q N ~ O -O ~ ~ ca O Ca ~ ca ~ 7 0 ~ ca N "' ~ U ~ O) ~ ~ U i ~ N ~ ~ oZ$ > ~ i p~ ~ ~ O Ca ~ i "' ca ca E: N _ 0 C ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~~ Ca C~ .C C ~ ~ C ~ C C C O O > ~ (a C U "a > 0 7 i U- O C O O rn M O N O O E: ~ O .r >, Q^ O ca i ?~ .~_ +_ ~. ~ to V S O UCa L C ... ro> ~ O T`mU N O O ..O Ca ~ =E~cn m~ C C i cn C> ~. `EAU UzU ~ .O t~ ~ C O~ a N ~ U ca a F-- _~ LL O Q O J OU ~ .~ O~ E S Q d vOi U "O m~ Q~ ~ • O • c~ • D & E-124 C7 .r .}4 ~*~4 y • ~--a [~ m ~jl {p ~' N ~ - ~ ~t Q r `r -zs- ~=~ 1 "~~ s ~ ~ N'Y y~~ ^ ~t ~ • • s ~,S~i ~~4K.«~'a ~~i H Yi ~,w`, < U ~" ~~,,_ , a ~ ~~ „~r. Q Q Q r.. , ~.~~ c a = ; =3's ~, ~ c 0 c 0 c 0 • O ~ U ~~ U ~? U Q1~ C y C~ C N N ...~ ~ C O 7 C o ~ C o W p p p ~,•` A~ <~' y ~ p f n U F'' _-, m ~~ U U U _~~ • • c.r<a '~ • I i ri O • ~>€4 t p m ~ i -1EAi m CD d C ~ C (~ `" C fA ~ ~ N U U ~ ~''~ ~ N ~ (~ ~~ O C >, +-' >, "-' C N >, O "O O C N ~~ >, O O C6 O ~ 7 C .O m C C~ O O ~ O p O U p 'D U O~ O ~ C~ C C f6 O U ~ ~ O ~ ~ ""' ~ > ~ ~ V O - i ~ to ui O - -~ W -= U ~Cn~~p- ~.~E ~ ~ . O Q ~ ~ O N ~ -o- N o O p W~~ O~ U p s ~ C U a. O p p c~ ~~ N~~~ 7 ~ ~~ ~O z z s N~ ~ O O N N O S ~~ O N > C Z ~ U > C i ~ ' ,M' O -Y C~ ~ ~ O to ~ ~ C ~ 7 CA O ~ .._ U O U C --~ a> ~ o-> > a~ " ~ ~ o W - ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~~- , c co ~ Q o c a O ~ ~ N > ~ u> cn co ~ o ~ ~ a~ m c ro m , c~ 4. ~ - -p Cn L o ~ ~ ~ ~ c m ~ wa~ o p ~ o cn ~ c ~ ~ ~ o g ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ -o ~ c c co co >' o ;,a,. , ~ c ~ m ~ ~ c cn ~ ~ ~ cn o ~n c ~ c c~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ c c .~ ~ p ~ a ~ O O ~yO p ~ ~ ~ C O C N C N m C O- ,~`, _ >i O O (~ ~` ~ (jf C 0~ ° ~x " ~ Q ct5 ~ U L ~ O t .~• O L X 0 0 0 ~ U - O "- O oZ ~ O 7 > ~ Cn O " Z c~ ~ C ~ ~_ O O O N _ ... U OU c0- CIS ~- > O ~ O T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cC ~ o W c U o c ~ c c~ i~ ~ O ~ c a ~~ c o~ U~ ~ ~ o c ~ ~ c o ~,~.o"- o ~,~: o°JCn o g ~ L a~ -° ~~s °''-~ o a~ m C~ L~ 0 U o1 ` O l t~ ~~ ~ ~ O C~ ~ T Q N~ 7~ i - i C i- ~ ~n p C ~ C_ C ,,,.,, ~ - ~ in O -p U c~ C ~ U C V C e ~ O" lA C cn ~ ~ 7 ~ c~ O LT i O (~ 7 (d O CS5 to "O N N O N N O "O [p 'O ~ C O ~ C C C C " ` fn O- O Q O~ J = C 0 C > to O ~ O L O ~ ~ OpU~ O~CDU Z U.c C C U in~p CU~ c nN in ~ in ~ in F- ~ W O D & E-125 • C ii~ S LL t ~' M~, i <, a I ~, exi .~~ ~ ~~ ~' ~`~ c 0 U CA i '~ , = ~" rx ~ Y` T ~r~ L.. O C Q ]~ C t ,,~ ;k t , U m O y /~ / ~ • LL v~ ~ '~~ n ~ N ~ O O ~ ~ (U ~ ~'' ~ '~ C c s c s +~ . i t ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ Q ~ N c~ ~ ~ Q ~ N p ~ O ~ ~ - C O N~~~ C~ O~ O C t ~ C~ U C> N~~ N N ~ ~ " p _ ~ O ~ ~ m C6 ~ O O C J, O L - L2 C > Off.. C ~ .r ~ O p Q C ~ N~ N CLS ..., L N C) C7 >, - - - C O ~ Cif O CD ~ >+ ~ N ~ N ~ ,~ ._ O ~ O ~ ~ ~ Cn L C13 O O ~ ~ N~ L p O Cn r 0 ~ >Z ~ Q U ~ ~ U ~ ~ ZT > O ~ ~^ (ll p ~ ~ 7 ~ - 00+-'-D~ V cII~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ O -~ ~ O C~i~ cts O ~ ~ ~ O ~ L ~ ~ - Oi '~ to " CO ~ ~ ~ Q N Q ~ ~ 7 ~ C - 7~ C C _~ S c~ ro o °~ ~ ~ . a E ~ C ~ 7- _ w ~ ' O 7 O W C m _ O CO o ~ m 'O ~ U ~ O a"i `~ a~i O o d ' ~ U U Y a ~ ~ -o -o -a o a> m U t L L ~ C_ Y p y.. L ~ L L1 ro ~ ~ }~ N C'7 ~Y ~ CO f~ t r ~ N C ro a m - -o ~ o , r _~ a a °a o .; _ °' ¢_ ~' ~ E m y_ O ~ L ~ U \ /~ Q C Y (/) 4-~ O C O O N ~ m Q ` U m ~ t in c m L c ro m O O ~ ~ ~ .~ Q m U O c a~ V o 0 c _ ~ _ (U C U G1 ~ o ~ ~ 7 C C7 3 O c IL Z ~ U ~ C1 ~ O U ~ o N a m '~ w f- ~ o ~ O ~ o o c a ~ ~ ~ tL- O O O ~ Q m U ~ W Cll C _O) N r ~ O O N D a~i C C CT C ~ (U ~ p7 C C7 ~ CT ~ ~ CU i N ~ ~ O O tq i ~ U O (0 O ~ f w ~ ~ ~ ro ~ C Q C a 0 .Q E c°~ m m U °~ p c w ~ v U ~ p U ~ w 5 0 °~ O, ~ ~ U m a ~ d o p w 0 0 0 it U ~ U m ~ w N C O CU a N Y ^V W U O d Y U O f~ C O Y L U O i C c C C cts a • O • • D & E-126 • 1~~ ~ ~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #• ' VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 SUBJECT. VARIANCE APPLICANT JONES CONVEY GORUP LOCATION SOUTHSIDE OF WILSON AVENUE, WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE-APN 0201-182-28 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements • 1 The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Clty may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-09, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Variance approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations ~C-1-OS I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00443StdCond 2-28 doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- D & E-127 Protect No DRC2005-00443 Completion Date 2 Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as ail Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating ail Conditions of Approval shall be _/_/_ submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first 6 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS NOTE ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) D. General Requirements 1 Submit five complete sets of plans including the following _/_/_ a Site/Plot Plan, b Foundation Plan, c Floor Plan, d Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan, e Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning, and g Planning Department Project Number (DRC2005-00443) clearly identified on the outside of all plans h Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls i All sheets must be marked NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2 Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 3 Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00443StdCond 2 28 doc • D & E-128 Project No DRC2005-00443 4 Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for Information and submittal requirements ~. Site Development 1 Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction All plans shall be marked with the project file number (DRC2005-00443) The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Callfornla Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations In effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or mayor addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate Such fees may include, but are not limited to City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance 3 The Building and Safety Official shall provide the street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits 4 Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays F. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness 2 Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations • 3 Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions G. Grading 1 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with Callfornla Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan 2 A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of Callfornla to perform such work 3 A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check 4 The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer • 3 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00443StdCond 2-28 doc Completion Date _/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. D & E-129 Protect No DRC2005-00443 Completion Date H. Additional Requirements/Comments 1 Note on title sheet that plans must be submitted for plan check and be approved prior to _/_/_ . construction The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application Contact the Building and Safety Department if you have any questions about the procedure at (909) 477-2710 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1 Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, _/_/ community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map 2 Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from _/_/_ street centerline) 52 total feet on Wilson Avenue _/_/_ 3 Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards _/_/_ 4 All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall bequit-claimed or delineated on the _/_/_ final map 5 Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be _/_/_ dedicated to the City J. Street Improvements 1 All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped _/_/_ areas, etc) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees 2 Pursuant to City Council Resolution No 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source _/_/_ of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that In developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development • 4 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00443StdCond 2-28 doc D & E-130 Protect No DRC2005 00443 Construct the following perimeter street Improvements Including, but not limited to • Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C Pvmt Side- walk Drrve Appr Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Wilson Avenue X X X X X X (g) Tamarind Drive X X X X X X (e)(f) Cabrosa Place X X X X X X Notes (a) Median Island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114 (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item (e) Cul-de-sac (f) Curbside drain outlet (g) ADA access ramps 4 Improvement Plans and Construction a Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first b Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required c Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer d Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction • protect along mayor or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No 6 at intersections and No 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified Handicapped access ramps shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer Existing Clty roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction Street or lane closure permits are required A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program • I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00443stdCond 2-28 doc Completion Date -/_/ -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/_/ -/_/. -/-/- D & E-131 Project No DRC2005-00443 Completion Date Install street trees per Clty street tree design guidelines and standards as follows The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1) " Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables For additional information, contact the Project Engineer Min Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty Cabrosa Place Lagerstoemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid -White 3 ft 20 ft o c 24-inch Fill-in "Natchez" Tamarind Drive Sophora japonica Japanese Pagoda Tree 5 ft 30 ft o c 15-gal Wilson Avenue P A less than 8 ft Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Hybrid - 3 ft 20 ft o c 24-inch "Muskogee" Lavender P A. 8 ft or reater Cinnamomum camphora Camphor Tree 8 ft 30 fl o c 15-gal Construction Notes for Street Trees 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfiil soil amendments, as determined by the City Inspector 3) All street trees are subject to Inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public Improvement plans only 7 Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the Clty Engineer for conformance with adopted policy On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project Intersections, Including driveways Local residential street intersections and commercial or Industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required K. Public Maintenance Areas 1 A separate set of landscape and Irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District Wilson Avenue trail 2 Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces 3 A signed consent and waiver form to loin and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Clty Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first Formation costs shall be borne by the developer 4 All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City 6 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00443StdCond 2-28 doc -/-/. • -/_/_ • -/-/. -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- • D & E-132 Project No DRC2005-00443 L. Drainage and Flood Control • 1 A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the Issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first All drainage facilities shall be Installed as required by the Clty Engineer M. Improvement Completion If the required public Improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an Improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be regwred for All_pubiic Improvements N. Uti I sties 1 Provide separate utility services to each parcel Including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards Easements shall be provided as required 2 The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3 Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects • 4 Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them O. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the firs# six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • 7 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00443StdCond 2-28 doc Completion Date _~_~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~. -~_~. -~ ~_ -~-~- D & E-133 ~ ~,,....~+ A A r Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District oowo», `» ~h y A • ~ ~~h n Fire Construction Services Py STANDARD CONDITIONS June 8, 2005 Randy Davis Tract 17343 (4) Parcel Map Subdivision SUBTPM17343 and DRC2005-00443 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1 Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants a The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500 feet No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more • than 250 feet from an approved fire hydrant For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200 feet b Fire hydrants are to be located The preferred locations for fire hydrants are i At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways u At intersections iii On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible iv As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District v A minimum of 40 feet from any building FSC-2 Fire Flow 1 The required fire flow for this project is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch This requirement is made in accordance with Fire • Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances D & E-134 2 Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subJect to Fire District review and approval Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shalt not be used to provide required fire flow 3 Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved 4 On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site FSC-4 Requirement for an Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance 15, the 2001 California Fire Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in 1 All structures that do not meet Fire District access requirements (see Fire Access) 2 When required fire flow cannot be provided due to inadequate volume or pressure FSC-6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets, and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard 9-7 Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are a The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet b The maximum inside turn radius shall be 20 feet c The minimum outside turn radius shall be 46 feet d The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet e The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side g The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent h The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW) 2 • • D & E-135 ~ Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus • 2 Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1 The following design requirements apply a All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device The devices shall be digital Analog devices are not acceptable Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications b Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch c The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate d A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex e The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20 minutes and shall automatically reset 3 Fire Lane Identification Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1 Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards # 9-4, #10-2 and #10-4 The Building & Safety Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped • 3 D & E-136 2 Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project Please reference the RCFPD Water Pian Submittal Procedure Standard # 9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped 3 Construction Access The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7 All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet, 6 inches above the finished surface of the road 4 Fire Flow A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services 5 Easements and Reciprocal Agreements All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures" • PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1 Hydrant Markers All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers" On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location 2 Private Fire Hydrants For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code 3 Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services • 4 D & E-137 The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the • required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways 4 Address• Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness The numbers shall be visible from the street When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry • • 5 D & E-138 T H E C I T Y O F .. ~ RANCHO C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: February 28, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MODIFICATION OF NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC DRC2005-00256 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES (on behalf of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc) A request to modify an approved Conditional Use Permit by adding entertainment consisting of karaoke, a solo singer, small band, and disk hockey performances for an EI Torito restaurant of about 7,200 square feet in the Regional Related Commercial District located on the southwest corner of Foothill • Boulevard and I-15 Freeway -APN 0229-021-58 Related Files Entertainment Permit DRC2006-00816, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17077, Preliminary Review DRC2005-00020 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2006-00816 - ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES (on behalf of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc) A request to provide entertainment consisting of karaoke, a solo singer, small band, and disk hockey performances for an EI Torito restaurant of about 7,200 square feet (pending construction) in the Regional Related Commercial District located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and I-15 Freeway -APN 0229-021-58 Related files Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00256, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17077, and Preliminary Review DRC2005-00020 This project is categorically exempt from the requirement of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA guidelines Section 15301 Existing Facilities BACKGROUND The purpose of an Entertainment Permit is to determine whether a proposed entertainment use complies with the objectives of the Development Code and General Plan, and to ensure that the proposed use is compatible with neighboring uses If necessary, conditions may be required to provide adequate mitigation of any potentially adverse impacts Per Chapter 5 12 of the Municipal Code, "no person or business entity shall operate, conduct, or manage any place or premises open to the public where food or beverages are sold, offered for sale, or given away, and where any form of entertainment, as defined herein, is provided or furnished without first obtaining a permit " As the Items F & G PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00256 AND DRC2006-00816 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES February 28, 2007 Page 2 applicant was required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit for their bar (related file DRC2005-00256), any changes to the restaurant's activities also require an application to modify the Conditional Use Permit Both applications are subject to the review and approval by the Planning Commission PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North - Victoria Gardens Lifestyle Center -Mixed South - Interstate 15 -zoning not applicable East - Interstate 15 -zoning not applicable West - Foothill Crossings commercial complex (RRO/C) Victoria Community Plan B General Plan Designations Project Site -General Commercial North -Mixed Use South -Interstate 15 East -Interstate 15 West -General Commercial Use (MU), Victoria Community Plan - Regional Related Office/Commercial C Site Characteristics The proposed entertainment activities will occur in EI Tonto, a restaurant at the northwest corner of a 5-building commercial complex located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Interstate 15 and Foothill Boulevard The entire complex is under construction In addition to the subject restaurant, the center consists of a drive-thru restaurant, a bank, and two multi-tenant buildings The properties to the north are part of the Victoria Garden Lifestyle Center while the property to the west is the Foothill Crossing commercial center Following a diagonal alignment to the east and south is Interstate 15 On the other side of the freeway is the Foothill Marketplace commercial center ANALYSIS A Use Description and Hours of Operation The applicant proposes to add entertainment consisting of performances by karaoke singers, a solo singer, small bands, and recorded music played by a disk hockey (Exhibit D) These activities will serve as entertainment for the customers The hours of operation will be Monday through Thursday from 11 00 a m to 11 00 p m , and Friday through Sunday from 9 00 a m to 11 00 p m The applicant has indicated that there will be about 30 employees during the restaurant's busiest hours (5 00 p m - 9 00 p m) The applicant is not proposing any exterior modifications to the building or its surroundings The parking requirements for this land use remain unchanged B Compatibility with surroundings Staff anticipates that the addition of these activities will not affect the restaurant's ability to comply with the performance standards of this development district Interference with neighboring businesses is unlikely because all of the surrounding businesses are commercial The proposed entertainment is entirely indoors and the noise volume at which these types of activities are performed will not be noticeable from outside The nearest residences are about 1,000 feet way to the northwest • • F&G-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2005-00256 AND DRC2006-00816 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES February 28, 2007 • Page 3 C Environmental Assessment Staff has determined that the protect is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines The protect qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 which covers the permitting and minor alterations of existing private structures involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original environmental determination Because the protect only proposes the permitting of entertainment, a modification of an existing Conditional Use Permit, and minor interior alterations, staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing m the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the protect site No comments have been received m regards to this protect RECOMMENDATION Based on the above analysis, Staff recommends approval of the modification to Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00256 and Entertainment Permit DRC2006-00816 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions and Standard Conditions Respectfully submitted, ~• • Jam s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director Attachments Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Site Plan Exhibit C -Floor Plan Exhibit D -Correspondence describing business operations and security plan Resolution of Approval to modify Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-00256 Resolution of Approval for Entertainment Permit DRC2006-00816 • F&G-3 i ~- f ~, / .~ '~ ---- . 11 ~~ Jl (I// ~ ~ r' .~~! ~ ------ _ ~^~=--- ~_ 1 ~ W~ ! 1 m a a _- , ------------t-- ~~ ----- / ~~ p H m ~~ I ~~N f,~ fir . ~ 6 ~~ y~~~J 1' a ~ '/ ®~ F f/i ~ ® ~ ~ w ~~ ~~ ~4 ~~~%~ ~ , Y ~ / ;~ ___I F- % ~ ,~ z /~ W ~Ua /' O Oz>~ ,/ ~¢o~~ '~ ~., ~~~ ~~ ` / v. \ i / . / ` /4,~i ~s° !!!!!l~~~ffflll/// ffflll/// ~~d a~au u x ~~~~~ ~ ~ _~~ 8 ~ CGG,6 t, ~ 7 c '~~H~H ~Bexo. ~ ~g a~~ ~~ ~~ZZw Q ~ ^ Z ~ ¢ ¢ ~ ~ fl ~c~ O~ O~~ fn ~~N Zzs~ F-~ ~ ~b4e; ~~~ ~ &~~ ~~~~g~~o ~~~~~~e ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ a s~ ~~~~ ~ ~ . • EXHIBIT a F&G-5 ~ U Q U LLB O r~ z~ U ~I ~ ~I 4Z J Q. W Q~~ ~'~a z z w a. cW G W U '~ ~~ ~'~ e e~ ~3t. N ,i • i" U L/1 N b D ~ '-~ < O c7 Z ~ N_ _~ .s-,i 0 a~ n m ~ n x ~ I~ s-,sz ,n-ez ^ ^ _ ~ \~ ~ ~T ~ 2 i-,zi N O b i' is ~~ _Z ]•Z c~ 'm, ~ 4 ~ .c-,fc ,i-z~ b > ~eNeeAu.~ ~oc~s'G-~ nr~ cue ~A~Ic,Qu~e EXHIBIT C F&G-6 y f r ~ • D • LETTER OF OPERATION PROJECT NAME: EI Torito Restaurant PROJECT ADDRESS: 12369 Foothill Blvd, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 PROJECT DESCRIPTION EI Torito is requesting an Entertainment Permit to allow karaoke, a solo singer, small band, & Disk Jockey performances in conJunction with the operation of a 7,166 sq ft restaurant The hours of operation are from Monday through Thursday, from 11am to lipm, Friday & Saturday from 10am to lam, & Sunday from gam to ilpm. There shall be a total of 130 employees There will be 30 employees during the maximum shift during the busiest hours, from 5pm to 9pm EI Torito Restaurants have been open since 1954 and have multiple locations in the U S. & other international countries. EI Torito's goal is to provide a variety of creative and authentic Mexican Cuisine to the neighboring community in a family oriented restaurant Along with serving authentic cuisine, they would to provide other forms of entertainment along with dining for a completely fulfilling experience. EI Torito would like provide guests with Karaoke, allowing them to sing songs that they like. There will also be a solo singer & small band that will perform while guests • enJoy their food. EI Torito would also like to provide an occasional Disk Jockey The volume levels will be kept at reasonable level & the restaurant is in afree-standing building. These live entertainment acts will not be like a battle of the bands or American Idol type of venue, as it is more to entertain the guests that are dining. There are no admission fees, as this is a restaurant which provides entertainment to dining guests. The use itself is wholly proper in relation to the adJacent commercial uses The alcohol service is consistent and compatible with the community and only seeks to provide the same level of amenities as other EI Torito Restaurants, as some of the other restaurants do provide entertainment that is similar to what is being requested for this specific location. The requested use at the location proposed will not be materially detrimental to the use, enjoyment or valuation of property of other persons located in the vicinity. The addition of a restaurant operation is wholly consistent with the commercial intent of the Master Pian, and will not inhibit its implementation. It will not hinder the achievement of community redevelopment goals, nor will it affect the character of development in the immediate neighborhood EI Torito will comply with all applicable standards requested by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, Police Department, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning • Division & ail other applicable City Departments. EXHIBIT D F&G-7 SECURITY PLAN PROJECT NAME• EI Tonto Restaurant PROJECT ADDRESS. 12369 Foothill Blvd, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 PROJECT DESCRIPTION. EI Torito is requesting an Entertainment Permit to allow karaoke, a solo singer, small band, & Disk Jockey performances in conjunction with the operation of a 7,166 sq. ft. restaurant. The hours of operation are from Monday through Thursday, from iiam to iipm, Friday & Saturday from 10am to lam, & Sunday from gam to iipm. There shall be a total of 130 employees. There will be 30 employees during the maximum shift during the busiest hours, from 5pm to 9pm. All employees serving alcoholic drinks will partiapate in the Department of Alcohoi~c Beverage Control's LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) program. All employees at the restaurant will be trained to recognize patrons that are intoxicated and will cease the service of alcohol to these patrons. Employees will be trained to request identification from anyone appearing to be under 30 years of age. The premises will be fully alarmed during non-business hours. All doors and windows will be closed and alarmed. There will not be any security guards because this establishment is a family-style restaurant that caters to local neighborhood communities. Applicant will comply with all applicable standards requested by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division & all other applicable City Departments to prevent such problems as gambling, loitering, theft, vandalism and truancy. • F&G-8 • RESOLUTION NO 07-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION OF NON-CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00256, A REQUEST TO MODIFY AN APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BY ADDING ENTERTAINMENT CONSISTING OF KARAOKE, A SOLO SINGER, SMALL BAND, AND DISK JOCKEY PERFORMANCES FOR AN EL TORITO RESTAURANT OF ABOUT 7,200 SQUARE FEET IN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND I-15 FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, APN 0229-021-58 A Recitals 1 Art Rodriguez and Associates, on behalf of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc, owner of EI Tonto Restaurant, has filed an application to modify Conditional Use Permit No DRC2005-00256 as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in th-s Resolution, the subJect Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 28th day of February 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date • 3 Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 28, 2007 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to EI Tonto, a restaurant of about 7,200 square feet, that is part of a commercial complex comprised of five buildings southwest of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Interstate 15 This complex is currently under construction, and b The applicant has submitted an Entertainment Permit application to allow entertainment activities consisting of performances by karaoke singers, a solo singer, small bands, and recorded music played by a disk Jockey at various times during the restaurant's operating hours, and c The subJect property and all properties to the west are zoned Regional Related • Office/Commercial (RRO/C), Victoria Community Plan, while the properties to the north are zoned Mixed Use (MU), Victoria Community Plan To the east and south, following a diagonal alignment, is Interstate 15, and F&G-9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-10 DRC2005-00256 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES February 28, 2007 Page 2 • d The subject property is surrounded on the west and north by commercial buildings, and e The hours of operation will be Monday through Thursday from 11 00 a m to 11 00 p m ,and Friday through Sunday from 9 00 a m to 11 00 p m ,and f There are no physical changes to the restaurant proposed except for minor interior revisions Nor are there any changes proposed to the project site 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the distract in which the site is located, and b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements m the vicinity, and c The application, which contemplates modifications to the operations of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Conditional Use Permit Modification approval is for adding entertainment This entertainment shall be limited to performances by karaoke singers, a solo singer, small bands, and recorded music played by a disk hockey at EI Torito Restaurant located at 12369 Foothill Boulevard m the Regional Related Office/Commercial (RRO/C) District, Victoria Community Plan 2) A minimum of one duly licensed, certified or trained, and regularly employed security guard from a reputable security firm shall be required to be on the premises during the scheduled hours when entertainment is provided until the parking lot is cleared after the closing of business The • guard shall be in peace officer attire and shall remain on duty in the parking area and outside adjacent areas of the facility to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons or anyone in the F&G-10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-10 DRC2005-00256 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES February 28, 2007 • Page 3 parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbance The applicant shall provide documentation verifying this condition such as a security services contract 3) Ail entertainment activities shall be limited to the interior of the restaurant 4) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances 5) The business shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit may be reviewed by the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use 6) Any modification or intensification of the use beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission • 7) All signs, including special advertising or event signs, are subject to Uniform Sign Program #180 and the City's Sign Ordinance A Sign Permit application is required for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation 6 The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2007 BY ATTEST Pam Stewart, Chairman James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretaryto the Planning DepartmentfortheCity of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of February 2007 • F&G-11 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #. DRC2005-00256 SUBJECT. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT. ART RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES (FOR REAL MEX RESTAURANTS. INC LOCATION. 12369 FOOTHILLB BOULEVARD - APN 0229-021-58 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements 1 The appllcant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, Its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The appllcant shall reimburse the Clty, Its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action The Clty may, at Its sole discretion, participate at Its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve appllcant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-10, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for Information only to all parties Involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect B. Time Limits Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire If building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval No extensions are allowed C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which Include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Victoria Specific Plan -1-05 I \PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2005-00256Stand Conds2-28final doc Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/-/- F&G-12 2 Project No DRC2005-00256 Completion Date Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~ _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits 5 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance D. Shopping Centers 1 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 2 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debns remain for more than 24 hours -/-/_• -/-/- -/-/- / / / / • • 2 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12007 Res & Stf Rpt1DRC2005-00256Stand Conds2-28final doc F&G-13 RESOLUTION NO 07-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2006-00816, A REQUEST TO PROVIDE ENTERTAINMENT CONSISTING OF KARAOKE, A SOLO SINGER, SMALL BAND, AND DISK JOCKEY PERFORMANCES FOR AN EL TORITO RESTAURANT OF ABOUT 7,200 SQUARE FEET (PENDING CONSTRUCTION) IN THE REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND I-15 FREEWAY, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, APN 0229-021-58 A Recitals 1 Art Rodriguez and Associates, on behalf of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc, owner of EI Tonto Restaurant, filed an application to modify Conditional Use Permit No DRC2005-00256 This application is an associated request for a related Entertainment Permit as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 28th day of February 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date • 3 Ail legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 28, 2007 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to EI Torito, a restaurant of about 7,200 square feet that is part of a commercial complex comprised of five buildings southwest of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Interstate 15 This complex is currently under construction, and b The restaurant has a Conditional Use Permit to operate a bar (related file DRC2005-00256) An application to modify this Conditional Use Permit to allow entertainment has been submitted for review and approval, and c The subject property and all properties to the west are zoned Regional Related Office/Commercial (RRO/C), Victoria Community Plan, while the properties to the north are zoned • Mixed Use (MU), Victoria Community Plan To the east and south, following a diagonal alignment, is Interstate 15, and F&G-14 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-11 DRC2006-00256 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES February 28, 2007 Page 2 • d The subject property is surrounded on the west and north by commercial buildings, and e The applicant proposes to add entertainment activities consisting of performances by karaoke singers, a solo singer, small bands, and recorded music played by a disk hockey at various times dunng the restaurant's operating hours, and f The hours of operation will be Monday through Thursday from 11 00 a m to 11 00 p m ,and Friday through Sunday from 9 00 a m to 11 00 p m ,and g There are no physical changes to the restaurant proposed except for minor interior revisions Nor are there any changes proposed to the project site 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission dunng the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the pubic health, safety, or welfare or materially in~unous to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and • c The application, which contemplates modifications to the operations of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Entertainment Permit approval is for performances by karaoke singers, a solo singer, small bands, and recorded music played by a disk hockey at EI Torito Restaurant, located at 12369 Foothill Boulevard in the Regional Related Office/Commercial (RRO/C) District, Victoria Community Plan 2) A minimum of one duly licensed, certified or trained, and regularly employed security guard from a reputable security firm shall be required to be on the premises dunng the scheduled hours when entertainment is • provided until the parking lot is cleared after the closing of business The guard shall be in peace officer attire and shall remain on duty in the F&G-15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-11 DRC2006-00256 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES February 28, 2007 • Page 3 parking area and outside adjacent areas of the facility to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons or anyone in the parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbance The applicant shall provide documentation verifying this condition such as a security services contract 3) All entertainment activities shall be conducted entirely within the building 4) No adult entertainment as defined in Section 17 04 090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is permitted 5) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances 6) The business shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels If the entertainment activities cause adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Entertainment Permit may be reviewed by the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use • 7) Any modification or intensification of the activities beyond what are specifically approved by this Entertainment Permit shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission 8) The applicant shall submit an annual Entertainment Renewal Permit application and fee of $75 00 per Municipal Code Section 5 12 115 6 The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2007 BY Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R Troyer, AICP, Secretary to the Planning Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and . adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of February 2007 F&G-16 ~~ ~~~~ ~ -~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT # DRC2006-00816 SUBJECT• ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT APPLICANT. ART RODRIGUEZ & ASSOCIATES (FOR REAL MEX RESTAURANTS. INC LOCATION: 12369 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD - APN 0229-021-58 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS General Requirements 1 The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the Issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval The applicant shall reimburse the Clty, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense In the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2 Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 07-11, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size) The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect 3 The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below The protect planner will confirm which fees apply to this protect All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing a) Notice of Exemption - $50 B. Site Development 1 The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Victoria Specific Plan SC-1-05 1 I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2007 Res & Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00816cond2-281 doc Comoletion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/_/. F&G-17 2 Project No DRC2006-00816 Completion Date Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions ~ _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director 3 Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy 4 Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance C. Shopping Centers 1 Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours 2 The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours -/-/_ /_/_ -/-/- -/-/- • Z I \PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM12007 Res i~ Stf Rpt\DRC2006-00816cond2-281 doc F&G-18 • • • ^~ \ ~~~ ~~,~- T H E C I T Y O F ~. ~~ ~, ___ - - - -r„ - M . _ , w~. s _ _r_ z .u :~ ~ ~K , _ ~.. - RANCYIO CU CAMON GA Stuff Report DATE February 28, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Lou LeBlanc, Assistant Planner SUBJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2005-00327 - WILLIAMS CHIAO ARCHITECTS - A review of a master plan for phased development of an 8,287 square foot fellowship hall and a 5,285 square foot sanctuary, totaling 13,572 square feet on 1 52 acres of land in the Medium Residential Distract, located at 8619 Baker Avenue - 0207-132-53 Related files Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00327 BACKGROUND On January 22, 2007, the legal notice for the above protect inadvertently indicated that a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect was prepared for consideration However, the correct environmental determination for the protect is a categorical exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) To correct this error, staff is requesting that the Planning Commission continue the protect so that a proper legal notice can be prepared and released for protect review at a later date CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the protect site When a new meeting date has been determined the item will be re-advertised and notice of the meeting will be mailed to property owners within a 660 foot radius of the protect site RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue the item to allow staff additional time to properly re-notice the protect Respectfully submitted, Jam°~s R Troyer, AICP Planning Director Item H . r '~ ~ =`~~~ ~~ ~t.~--' - • ~T ~H_E ti ~_ C.~) T Y____.~,~ O F, _ _ ~_ RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~~ Stiff Report DATE February 28, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, Planning Director BY Michael Diaz, Senior Planner SUBJECT PROGRESS REPORT ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88-45 AND ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-03 -MARGARITA BEACH ANALYSIS In August of 2006, staff presented a second three-month progress report for Margarita Beach as • required by the modified conditions of approval adopted by the City Council on February 15, 2006 (Resolution No 06-052) At that time staff reported that the majority of the required changes in operation had been completed, that complaints had been received from local residents, and that no arrests or serious crimes occurred at Margarita Beach during the preceding timeframe In mid-January 2007, staff received information that Margarita Beach was closing its business m Rancho Cucamonga Staff visited the property and took note of an eviction notice posted on the door with a compliance date of January 31, 2007 Based on the eviction notice, a February 5, 2007 front page story in the Daily Bullet-n, and a notice at the applicant's website, staff has concluded that Margarita Beach has indeed closed its business at the subject location The stated reason for the closure of the business was a dispute with the landlord regarding the renewal of the lease Since Margarita Beach has closed, no further progress reports will be prepared for this particular business RECOMMENDATION Staff requests that the Planning Commission receive the report and file for future reference Respectfully submitted, l ~~-~- ~. ~, Jams R Troyer, AICP Planning Director • Attachments Exhibit A -Daily Bulletin Story -February 5, 2007 Exhibit B -Notice from http //www myspace comliepart~r Item I :argarita Beach owner looking 1 open larger, upscale venue Nendy Leung and had spawned a year long battle VJFiter between the owner and nearoy resi- dents has shut its doors permanently 4NCH0 CUCAMONGA -Mar a Beach a sports bar and grill that Owner Marl. Davtdtion tiatd a dt. oeen m rho commumrv for 11 years pure wuh the landlord over the deact- line of a least renewal is the main cause of the closure Davidson lard he is looking to open a larger operauon, something al.tn to concert venue House of Blues m the eastern pomon of the city That's what we don't hive a small concert venue that sits SUU to 70U nennle' f)wir•cm cn.a T'^^r ~ ~~ be a huge benem for «~_ ~,.y -- ~---- - Margarita Beach, located at 9950 changing trs ? a m closing rime to midnight Foothill Blvd , was a source of contro- versy when restdenu broueht their L1st r ebruary - after many hours of complmnts to the city two years ago testimony from lawyers mvesugators that the bar s customers were leavtng and residena - the Ctt} Council trash, beer bonles and a host of nasty voted 3-l m favor of Davidson allow behavior to their neighborhood trig him to kce.p his hours of uperan The planning Commission decided Se^ SPORTS B0.R 1 P~ MONDAY FEBRUARl S 311U7 SPOTS ~ Con4nued from Page A7 while putting Margartta Beach on notice According to Planning Direc- tor James Troyer the bar had been m compliance dui trig the two reviews conducted m the patit year by the city Ed Sanchez who was a vocal opponent of how Margarita Belch was opuranng, smd he was pleased that it closed but was wary over what would replace the bar The Ctty Council has tone through and said you can oper- ate a nightclub th~re," said Sanchez referring to February s vote "lt might not be opcraung as Margarita Beach as we know it, but we as a netghborhood still have to take nonce We don't know what we're going to get there " Sanchez said in the past year, there were several incidents with people loriertng m the netghborhood Davidson said business for the past year, whsle very good on the weekends, was very slow on other nights One challenee, he said, was promoting the busy Hess without using the fliers that residents had objected to Neighbors had used the fliers of scantily clad women as evi- duu ethat NI irglnta Aeach was opc.rannp hke an adult cabaret Davidson said he is having prehmmary conversations with the city and doing research on opening another business He said he wants to open a larger, more upscale venue in the Victoria Gardens area Councilman Rex Gutierrez, who supported Davidson to last year's vote, said he would sup- port him again "I do hope that tt will be compatible with everyone," Gutierrez said "I've never had problems with Mark Davidson, 1 hope he does open another business to town " Staff writer Wendy Leung can be reached by a-mail at wendy leung~dailybulletm tom, or by phone at (909) 483-8376. r11 u EXH I B iT A ~-2 • ~XHIBIT B Source http~//www myspace com/iepar-ly I-3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-08 SUBTPM17343 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 3 b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and (n) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Plannina Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a single parcel (APN 0201-182-28) of 130,240 square feet at the south side of Wilson Avenue, about 600 feet west of Haven Avenue, into four separate parcels 2) The development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Very Low Residential District and the Equestrian Overlay, including the separation of horsekeeping faalities such as corrals/barns and dwellings 3) Precise grading of the project site shall be consistent with the finished pad elevations as noted in Exhibit D of the staff report T few-, l~ E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-09 VARIANCE DRC2005-00443 -JONES COVEY GROUP February 28, 2007 Page 3 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, togetherwith all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto and incorporated herein by the reference, based upon the finding as follows a Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration b The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with CEQA, and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration c The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project e The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Those documents are available for public review m the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below r~~ ~l~' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-11 DRC2006-00816 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES February 28, 2007 Page 2 and d The subject property is surrounded on the west and north by commercial buildings, e The applicant proposes to add entertainment activities consisting of performances by karaoke singers, a solo singer, small bands, and recorded music played by a disk hockey at various times during the restaurant's operating hours, and f The hours of operation will be Monday through Thursday from 11 00 a m to 11 00 p m ,and Friday through Sunday from 9 00 a m to 11 00 p m ,and g There are no physical changes to the restaurant proposed except for minor interior revisions Nor are there any changes proposed to the project site 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is m accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district m which the site is located, and b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially m~urious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and c The application, which contemplates modifications to the operations of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Entertainment Permit approval is for performances by karaoke singers, a solo singer, small bands, and recorded music played by a disk hockey at EI Tonto Restaurant, located at 12369 Foothill Boulevard in the Regional Related Office/Commercial (RRO/C) District, Victoria Community Plan 2J The hours of operation for the restaurant shall be Monday through Thursday, 11 00 a.m - 11.00 p.m., Friday and Saturday 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 a m., and Sunday 9.00 a.m. -11.00 p.m. Any modification of these hours shall require the review ~'~- ~D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-11 DRC2006-00816 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES February 28, 2007 Page 3 and approval by the Planning Commission of a modified Conditional Use Permit and modified Entertainment Permit. 3) The proposed entertainment is approved as an accessory to the restaurant use. A full menu of food must be served during all hours that entertainment is provided The construction or dedication of any part of the existing floor area for entertainment, such as a stage, dance floor, or a separate room is not permitted. Any requests to do so shall require the review and approval by the Planning Commission of a modified Conditional Use Permit and modified Entertainment Permit. 4) A minimum of one duly licensed, certified or trained, and regularly employed security guard from a reputable security firm shall be required to be on the premises during the scheduled hours when entertainment is provided until the parking lot is cleared after the closing of business The guard shall be in peace officer attire and shall remain on duty m the parking area and outside adjacent areas of the facility to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons or anyone in the parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbance The applicant shall provide documentation verifying this condition such as a security services contract 5) All entertainment activities shall be conducted entirely within the building 6) No adult entertainment as defined m Section 17 04 090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is permitted 7) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances 8) The business shall be operated m conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels If the entertainment activities cause adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Entertainment Permit may be reviewed by the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use 9) Any modification or intensification of the activities beyond what are specifically approved by this Entertainment Permit shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission 10) The applicant shall submit an annual Entertainment Renewal Permit application and fee of $75 00 per Municipal Code Section 5 12 115 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-10 DRC2005-00256 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES February 28, 2007 Page 2 and d The subject property is surrounded on the west and north by commercial buildings, e The hours of operation will be Monday through Thursday from 11 00 a m to 11 00 p m ,and Friday through Sunday from 9 00 a m to 11 00 p m ,and f There are no physical changes to the restaurant proposed except for minor interior revisions Nor are there any changes proposed to the project site 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth m paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows a The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district m which the site is located, and b The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially m~urious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, and c The application, which contemplates modifications to the operations of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code 4 The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified m this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualityAct of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15303(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth m paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the Planning Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Conditional Use Permit Modification approval is for adding entertainment This entertainment shall be limited to performances by karaoke singers, a solo singer, small bands, and recorded music played by a disk hockey at EI Torito Restaurant located at 12369 Foothill Boulevard in the Regional Related Office/Commercial (RRO/C) District, Victoria Community Plan 2) The hours of operation for the restaurant shall be Monday through Thursday, 11:00 a.m. - 11.00 p.m , Friday and Saturday 10 00 a.m. to 1.00 a.m., and Sunday 9:00 a.m -11 00 p m Any modification of these hours shall require the review and approval by the Planning Commission of a modified Conditional Use Permit and modified Entertainment Permit. ~+-G PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 07-10 DRC2005-00256 -ART RODRIGUEZ AND ASSOCIATES February 28, 2007 Page 3 3) The proposed entertainment is approved as an accessory to the restaurant use. A full menu of food must be served during all hours that entertainment is provided The construction or dedication of any part of the existing floor area for entertainment, such as a stage, dance floor, or a separate room is not permitted. Any requests to do so shall require the review and approval by the Planning Commission of a modified Conditional Use Permit and modified Entertainment Permit 4) A minimum of one duly licensed, certified or trained, and regularly employed security guard from a reputable security firm shall be required to be on the premises during the scheduled hours when entertainment is provided until the parking lot is cleared after the closing of business The guard shall be in peace officer attire and shall remain on duty in the parking area and outside adjacent areas of the facility to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons or anyone in the parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbance The applicant shall provide documentation verifying this condition such as a security services contract 5) All entertainment activities shall be limited to the interior of the restaurant 6) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances 7) The business shall be operated m conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to, noise levels If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit may be reviewed by the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use 8) Any modification or intensification of the use beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission 9) All signs, including special advertising or event signs, are subject to Uniform Sign Program #180 and the City's Sign Ordinance A Sign Permit application is required for review and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation 6 The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2007 1~' lV ~ -pal. Planning Commission Meeting of 2' ~ C~ 2-C~C~~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-UP SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding Thank you NAME 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ADDRESS ~ ~ ~6~1 ~ ~ Cninr~ao iZ1/c~ ~-~ ~--- Its, °r~~~ ~,. CITY ,~ ~~tSCr~~ ewr~ ~ Q ~~ ~ ~-- ITEM ~k ~_ ~ ~- 27