The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007/04/25 - Agenda Packet • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 25, 2007 - 7:00 PM • Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Stewart ~ Vice Chairman Fletcher _ Macias -~ Vacant Munoz / II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Regular meeting minutes of April 11, 2007 ~~ IV. DIRECTOR"S REPORTS ~~ A UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH in the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street - APN 1074-271-01 Related files Environmental Assessment and Development Review DRC2004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, Variance DRC2005-00323, Pre-Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP96-03, Conditional Use Permit 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382, and Development Review DRC2004-01019 CONTINUED FROM APRIL 11, 2007 1 of 3 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 25, 2007 ~~ V. PUBLIC COMMENTS ~~ This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda ~~ VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS ~~ ~~ VII. ADJOURNMENT ~~ The Planning Commission has adoptedAdministrative Regulations that set an 11 00 p m adjournment time If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 1, Lois J Schrader, Planning Commrssion Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certrfy that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 19, 2007, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964 2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga ..G~'- INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the ,r~~ V'~1 • • 2of3 • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 25, 2007 • staff table State your name for the record and speak into the microphone After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker"s podium It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual If you wish to speak concerning an item noton the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing The deadline for submitting these items is 6 00 p m Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m ,except for legal City holidays APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission"s decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk"s Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $1,747 for maps and $1,842 for all other decisions of the Commission (Fees are established and governed by the City Council) Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http //www ci rancho-cucamonga ca us 3of3 Vicinity Map ~ Planning Commission April 25, 2007 ,- ~ Meeting Location City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive Q • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting Apni 11, 2007 Chairman Stewart called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7 12 p m to run concurrently with the Historic Preservation Commission meeting that was previously convened The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Richard Fletcher, Lou Munoz, Pam Stewart ABSENT Rich Macias, (Cnstine McPhail -retired) STAFF PRESENT Rebecca Coleman, Office Specialist II, Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary, Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer, James Troyer, Planning Director ***** ANNOUNCEMENTS None • ***** APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carved 2-0-1-1-1 (Stewart abstain, Macias absent, McPhail retired), to approve the minutes of March 28, 2007 Motion Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 2-0-1-1-1 (Stewart abstain, Macias absent, McPhail retired), to approve the workshop minutes of March 28, 2007 CONSENT CALENDAR No items ***** PUBLIC HEARINGS A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00444 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan Land Use Map and applicable text sections from High Density Residential to Mixed Use for consistency with the existing General Plan on 14 33 acres of land (commonly known as the Joseph Filippi Winery), located at 12467 Base Line Road - APN 0227-161-10, 0227-161-24 and 1089-581-04 Related files Landmark Alteration DRC2007-00150 and • Development Agreement DRC2005-00361 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTAND MASTER PLAN DRC2005-00361 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS - A proposal to develop a master plan and development agreement to guide the development of the 14 33 acres of land (commonly known • as the Joseph Filippi Winery) located at 12467 Base Line Road - APN 0227-161-10, 0227- 161-24and 1089-581-04 Related files Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2006-00444 and Landmark Alteration DRC2007-00150 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Chairman Stewart noted that the Historic Preservation meeting remained open to allow item B from that agenda to be heard with items A and B of the Planning Commission agenda James Troyer, Planning Director, noted that a letter from Etiwanda School District was received and copies were placed before the Commissioners for their review He noted that the distract expressed concern regarding mitigation and school fees He asked that Landmark Alteration DRC2007-00150, Victoria Community Plan Amendment dRC2006-00444 and the Development Agreement and Master Plan DRC2005-00361, all related to Filippi Winery, be continued to the May 9, 2007 meeting to allow staff to properly address the concerns of the school distract Pete Pitassi, Pitassi Architects, stated he represents the interests of the winery He commented that the school district is interpreting the project as a multi-family project which is not a proper position or interpretation He said he has spoken with the district representative and asked them to look at the lofts and review the project He said that under the circumstances he agrees to continue the items as staff has requested Chairman Stewart opened the public hearing for anyone to comment that could not be present at the May 9 meeting The public hearing remained open Motion Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, to continue the public hearing to the May 9, • 2007 meeting of the Historic Preservation and Planning Commissions Motion carved by the following vote AYES FLETCHER, MUNOZ, STEWART NOES NONE ABSENT MACIAS, (McPHAIL, retired) -carried ***** DIRECTOR'S REPORTS C TRAIL PRIORITIES ANNUAL REVIEW Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, gave the staff report noting the Trail Committee's request to increase the amount of trails completed this next fiscal years and to also fill in the gaps in the trails on Sapphire Street segments He also noted that attached to the report is a letter from the Alta Loma Riding Club, an advisory group to the Trails Committee, that details their concerns regarding the trail on the east side of Beryl and Banyan and its safety asks It also notes the Sapphire section above 5708 Sapphire as being an unsafe area for riders Other priorities are noted in the letter The secretary received and filed the report with the Alta Loma Riding Club recommendations Chairman Stewart confirmed that the gaps in the Sapphire trail as the first priority of the Riding Club Mr Henderson concurred Vice Chairman Fletcher asked how long it would take to complete our trail system at the current rate • Planning Commission Minutes -2- April 11, 2007 Mr Henderson responded approximately 40-45 years ***** • D UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMM - UNITY CHURCH CONTINUANCE REQUESTED The Commissioners agreed to postpone the report on the issues at the church until the April 25, 2007 meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS Patrick Shubin stated he was making public comment as a class assignment ***** COMMISSION BUSINESS E # ***** ADJOURNMENT v~ ,\ Motion Moved by #, seconded by #, carried #, to adjourn The Planning Commission adJourne at # p m TO A WORKSHOPS The workshop adjourned at # p m and those minutes appe r • separately i ,~ ~ Respectf ~ubmitted, James R Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved Motion Moved by *****, seconded by ****, to adopt the ****** Motion carried by the following vote AYES FLETCHER, MACIAS, MUNOZ, McPHAIL, STEWART NOES NONE ABSENT NONE -carried • Planning Commission Minutes -3- April 11, 2007 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES • Regular Meeting Apnl 11, 2007 Chairman Stewart called the Regular Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7 12 p m to run concurrently with the Historic Preservation Commission meeting that was previously convened The meeting was held in the Council Chambers at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT Richard Fletcher, Lou Munoz, Pam Stewart ABSENT Rich Macias, (Cristine McPhail -retired) STAFF PRESENT Rebecca Coleman, Office Specialist II, Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney, Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary, Joe Stofa, Associate Engineer, James Troyer, Planning Director ***** ANNOUNCEMENTS None «***w • APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carved 2-0-1-1-1 (Stewart abstain, Macias absent, McPhail retired), to approve the minutes of March 28, 2007 Motion Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 2-0-1-1-1 (Stewart abstain, Macias absent, McPhail retired), to approve the workshop minutes of March 28, 2007 CONSENT CALENDAR No items ***** PUBLIC HEARINGS A ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00444 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan Land Use Map and applicable text sections from High Density Residential to Mixed Use for consistency with the existing General Plan on 14 33 acres of land (commonly known as the Joseph Filippi Winery), located at 12467 Base Line Road - APN 0227-161-10, 0227-161-24 and 1089-581-04 Related files Landmark Alteration DRC2007-00150 and Development Agreement DRC2005-00361 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative • Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTAND MASTER PLAN DRC2005-00361 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS - A proposal to develop a master plan and • development agreement to guide the development of the 14 33 acres of land (commonly known as the Joseph Filippi Winery) located at 12467 Base Line Road - APN 0227-161-10, 0227- 161-24 and 1089-581-04 Related files Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2006-00444 and Landmark Alteration DRC2007-00150 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration Chairman Stewart noted that the Historic Preservation meeting remained open to allow item B from that agenda to be heard with items A and B of the Planning Commission agenda James Troyer, Planning Director, noted that a letter from Etiwanda School District was received and copies were placed before the Commissioners for their review He noted that the district expressed concern regarding mitigation and school fees He asked that Landmark Alteration DRC2007-00150, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2006-00444 and the Development Agreement and Master Plan DRC2005-00361, all related to Filippi Winery, be continued to the May 9, 2007 meeting to allow staff to properly address the concerns of the school district Pete Pitassi, Pitassi Architects, stated he represents the interests of the winery He commented that the school distract is interpreting the project as a multi-family project which is not a proper position or interpretation He said he has spoken with the district superintendent and asked them to look at the lofts and review the project He said that under the circumstances he agrees to continue the items as staff has requested Chairman Stewart opened the public hearing for anyone to comment that could not be present at the May 9 meeting The public hearing remained open Motion Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, to continue the public hearing to the May 9, 2007 meeting of the Historic Preservation and Planning Commissions Motion carved by the following vote AYES FLETCHER, MUNOZ, STEWART NOES NONE ABSENT MACIAS, (McPHAIL, retired) -carved ***** DIRECTOR'S REPORTS C TRAIL PRIORITIES ANNUAL REVIEW Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, gave the staff report noting the Trail Committee's request to increase the amount of trails completed this next fiscal year and to also fill m the gaps m the trail on Sapphire Street He also noted that attached to the report is a letter from the Alta Loma Riding Club, an advisory group to the Trails Committee, that details their concerns regarding the trail on the east side of Beryl and Banyan and its safety risks It also notes the Sapphire section above 5708 Sapphire as being an unsafe area for riders Other priorities are noted in the letter The secretary received and filed the report with the Alta Loma Riding Club recommendations Chairman Stewart confirmed that the gaps in the Sapphire trail as the first priority of the Riding Club Mr Henderson concurred • Planning Commission Minutes -2- April 11, 2007 Vice Chairman Fletcher asked how long it would take to complete our trail system at the current rate of development Mr Henderson responded approximately 40-45 years ***** D UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH -CONTINUANCE REQUESTED The Commissioners agreed to postpone the report on the issues at the church until the April 25, 2007 meeting PUBLIC COMMENTS Patrick Shubin stated he was making public comment as a class assignment ***** COMMISSION BUSINESS None ***** ADJOURNMENT Motion Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Munoz, carried 3-0-1-1 (Macias absent, McPhail retired), to adjourn The Planning Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission adjourned concurrently at 7 36 p m Respectfully submitted, James R Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved • J Planning Commission Minutes -3- April 11, 2007 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO C U C A M O N G A St~f f Report DATE April 25, 2007 TO Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM James R Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY Rina Leung, Senior Planner SUBJECT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH m the Very Low Residential District (1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street - APN 1074-271-01 Related files Environmental Assessment and Development Review DRC2004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, Variance DRC2005-00323, Pre- Application Review DRC2004-00718, Conditional Use Permit DRC2001-00222, Conditional Use Permit CUP96-03, Conditional Use Permit 88-38, Conditional Use Permit CUP 88-10, Conditional Use Permit CUP 82-29, Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382, and Development Review DRC2004-01019 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) B Surrounding Land Use and Zoning North -Single-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) South -Single-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) West - Smgie-Family Dwellings, Very Low Residential Distract (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) C General Plan Designations Project Site -Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential District (1 - 2 dwelling units per acre) D Site Characteristics The site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street and has a total area of 8 86 acres Locator and Aerial Maps are included as Exhibits A and B The Hillside Community Church property is currently developed with a 7,700 square foot multi-purpose building (Family Center), modular Sunday school classrooms, Activity Pavilion, fields, and parking areas The church is in the process of constructing a new 76,019 square foot worship center and a parking structure that was ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH April 25, 2007 • Page 2 approved by Development Review DRC2004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, and Variance DRC2005-00323 in July 2005 The area surrounding the church is developed with single-family residences E Background for the Update Request On March 28, 2007, a resident spoke during public comment and raised issues with the approved development at the church Planning Department staff placed a report item on the April 11, 2007 Planning Commission meeting agenda for a status report of the City's efforts to address the concerns of neighbors surrounding the church The item was continued from the April 11, 2007 Planning Commission meeting During the April 11, 2007 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Department staff requested a continuance of the item to provide adequate time for review of the issues and for the preparation of a report to respond to the issues included on two separate lists provided by the resident adjacent to Hillside Community Church on April 4, 2007 ANALYSIS A Development of Hillside Community Church The Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit 82-29, which approved the church use along with regular team sport activities and the parking of vehicles on the field on February 9, 1983 On September 28, 1988, Conditional Use permit 88-10 was approved along with a Master Plan for the architectural design of the sanctuary The Master Plan that was approved in 1988 contemplated the intensification of the church, which anticipated the site would include a sanctuary, administration building, education/nursery building, and family center During the review of Conditional Use Permit 88-10 and the Master Plan, it was found that the two Conditional Use Permits (Conditional Use Permit 82-29 and Conditional Use Permit 88-10) were compatible The City approved the conceptual development of the church site prior to the development of the majority of the nearby residential uses Although the church completed its first permanent Family Center building in 1994, the approved Master Plan for the property anticipated the current expansion of Hillside Community Church During the review of Development Review DRC2004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, and Variance 2005-00323 m July of 2005 for the construction of the 76,019 square foot worship center and 101 stall parking structure, a total of four neighborhood meetings were held on the following dates • January 5, 2005, • January 24, 2005, • February 1, 2005, and • April 14, 2005 The following list summarizes the issues raised at the various neighborhood meetings held m 2005 • Adequate off street parking, • Height of the sanctuary, • Noise from church activities, and • Existing drainage culvert near the southwestern corner of the property is inadequate to accommodate runoff A-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH • April 25, 2007 Page 3 To alleviate the concerns brought up at the various neighborhood meetings in 2005, the architect for Hillside Community Church made modifications to the design prior to bringing the project to the Planning Commission for approval The Planning Commission approved Development Review DRC004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance . DRC2005.l30322, and Variance 2005-00323 with Conditions of Approval on July 27, 2005 See Exhibits C and D for the approved site and landscaping plans Although the aforementioned project was approved on July 27, 2005, the church is currently in the construction phase B Recent Inquiry and Public Comment Regarding Hillside Community Church During the March 28, 2007 Planning Commission meeting, public comment was received by a resident who resides adJacent to Hillside Community Church The resident stated at the Planning Commission meeting that the recent activities at Hillside Community Church created adverse impacts During the meeting on March 28, 2007, the Planning Commission requested that this resident provide a list of the issues On April 4, 2007, the resident provided the Planning Department with two separate lists of concerns, which are attached as Exhibits E and F Also, attached is Resolution 05-60 as Exhibit G, which is referenced m the lists, provided by the resident The following is a summary of the issues provided by the resident on the two separate lists (Exhibits E & F) along with staff's response Exhibit E (Lisf 11 The neighbors around & near H~lls~de Community Church_ alleged • v-olat~ons and rssue for review/revrs~ng HCC's CUP • Issue #1. Citation to Section B 5 of Resolution 05-60 (Planning Department Condition Number 6) regarding the field According to the resident, the Condition states that field parking shall be utilized commencing with the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy of the sanctuary The church has been utilizing the field for at least two years for parking, therefore, they have utilized the fields prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy Staff Response to Issue #1 • Conditional Use Permit 82-29 approved parking of vehicles on the field, provided that the fields were compacted The fields were graded and constructed to 95% compaction of sub-grade materials during construction to specifically support automobile traffic Hillside Community Church obtained approval to utilize the fields for parking since 1983 and anticipates the future use of these fields, therefore, the church is anticipating continuing the use of the fields for parking after the sanctuary has been completed The City developed Condition Number 6 to require the church to continue utilizing the fields for parking after the completion of the sanctuary It is anticipated that the church will be at full occupancy after the completion of the sanctuary, therefore, requiring the church to utilize the fields after the completion of the sanctuary was intended to prevent the parking of vehicles along residential areas • Issue #2- Citation to Section B 5 of Resolution 05-60 (Planning Department Condition Number 4) regarding noise The church is allowed to produce noise, 15 hours a day, which adversely impacts the property owners The resident stated that Condition Number 4 was prepared utilizing Section 17 02 120E 1 (Exhibit H) of the Development Code, which referred to private schools This Section 17 02 120E 1 of A-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH April 25, 2007 Page 4 the Municipal Code with a reference to private schools was not applicable to the project Staff Response to Issue #2 According to Hillside Community Church, the field is utilized 14 weeks/year for baseball and 11 weeks/year for soccer, sln~pections of the site revealed that there has been no indicator that the church is in violation of Planning Department Condition Number 4 Planning Department staff is in the process of reviewing if it was appropriate to utilize Section 17 02 120E 1 of the Municipal Code in developing Planning Department Condition Number 4 • Issue #3• Citation to Section B 3 d of Resolution 05-60 regarding findings that the project would not be detrimental to public health or materially injurious to property in the vicinity Outdoor sporting events created public nuisances and noise issues Staff Response fo Issue #3• The field had been contemplated during the processing of the original Conditional Use Permit 82-29 in February 1983 and Conditional Use Permit 88-10 in September of 1988 The fields have been m operation for many years There have been no new operations/activities conducted on the fields See staff response to issue #2 regarding noise issues Also, a representative from the Code Enforcement Department will be present at the April 25, 2007 Planning Commission hearing to further address Issue #3, if necessary • • Issue # 4. Citation to Section B 5 of Resolution 05-60 (Planning Department • Condition Number 4) regarding noise Outdoor cheering or use of amplified noise, bullhorns, concerts, movies, recreational games, and outdoor camp outs are example of activities that are exempt from the requirement of obtaining Special Use Permits Staff Response to Issue #4. Although the field had been contemplated during the processing the original Conditional Use Permit 82-29 m February 1983 and the subsequent Conditional Use Permit 88-10 in September of 1988, the fields have been m operation for many years, the Planning entitlements and Planning Department Condition Number 4 accommodated the existing uses on the site There have not been any new unapproved activities on site, hence, no intensification of the use has occurred at the fields Issue #5 Citation to Section B 2 h of Resolution 05-60 regarding parking Concerned if long-term parking will be available at Chaffey Community College Staff Response fo Issue #5. Throughout the years, Hillside Community Church has made a concentrated effort to request all members and regular attendees to avoid parking on all adjacent residential streets Although Chaffey Community College and Hillside Community Church have entered into a 10-year agreement, the church has a long term relationship with the College, which started 27-years ago when the church first held services at the College If the College is not able to provide parking in the future, the Church is still able to meet the minimal parking requirements of the Municipal Code Although Hillside Community Church is able meet their parking requirements on site, the Church stated that they anticipate on continuing the lease • with the College The City permits parking along Haven Avenue on Saturdays and A-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH . April 25, 2007 Page 5 Sundays, which would provide an additional parking opportunity off site away from residential streets Issue #6 C4#ation to Section B 3 d of Resolution 05-60 regarding findings that the pro)e~t wouJ.d r}ot be detrimental to public health or materially in)urious to property in the vicinity The two level parking structure is not consistent with a residential neighborhood and has adverse impacts on nearby residential uses Staff Response to Issue #6 The expansion of the site along with the increase of church attendance was anticipated m the approved Master Plan Also, the parking structure was part of the Development Review DRC2004-01019 that was approved in July 2005 According to the development plans, the height of the two level parking structure is 15 feet, which is an appropriate height for structures that are ad)acent to residential areas Furthermore, the two level parking structure was designed to utilize the grades on site The parking structure is built into an existing slope, which blends in with the existing slopes In addition, the parking structure is within the allowable height limit for the zone, which is 30 feet The parking structure is located 60 feet east of the west property line that separates the church and single-family residences It will generate 0 foot candle illumination at the shared property line, which is well below the maximum permitted of five foot candles The parking structure has been designed to blend with the design of the existing buildings on site and will be articulated with • landscaping and river rock on the south and west elevations The existing landscaping along with the planting of new additional landscaping will serve to soften views of the parking structure • Issue #7 Citations to Section B 5 of Resolution 05-60 (Environmental Mitigation Air Quality Conditions Numbers 1-4) A dirt pile 30 feet tall was not covered with plastic or watered down Staff Response to Issue #7. The pro)ect is required to be treated with water or other soil-stablilizmg agents Inspections of the site revealed that the site had been treated with water or soil-stablilizing agents Although the City has not reviewed the list, Hillside Community Church prepared a list of activities performed by their construction contractor that shows they have treated the site with water or soil-stablilizing agents • Issue #8• Citation to Section B 5 of Resolution 05-60 (Planning Department Condition Number 1) regarding relocation of removed trees The removal of 16 trees that were designated for relocation have not yet been replaced Staff Response fo Issue #8 Hillside Community Church is currently in the construction phase and anticipates completing the relocation of the 16 trees with the completion of their construction pro)ect • Issue #9• Citations to Section B 5 of Resolution 05-60 (Environmental Mitigation Noise Number 2) regarding construction activity as it relates to noise A constant issue with an increased amount of construction noise starting at 7 00 a m , has been reported to the City A-5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH April 25, 2007 Page 6 Staff Response to Issue #9 Although staff has increased the frequency of inspections of the site, excessive noise levels were not noted from construction activities Nonetheless, Hillside Community Church has been reminded of the noise standards Also, a representative from the Code Enforcement Department Vvill be° present at the April 25, 2007 Planning Commission hearing to further address +t~si,l~ #9, if necessary Issue #10. Conflict of interest with Mr Brad Buller who was once the City Planner and is currently employed by Hillside Community Church Staff Response to Issue #10 Mr Buller resigned from the City in September of 2005, which is approximately a year and a half ago The City does not regulate Mr Butler's current employment Exh-bit F (L-st 2)• Quest-ons on HCC CUP from neighbors Issue #1• Conflict of interest with Mr Buller who was once the City Planner and who is now employed by Hillside Community Church Staff Response to Issue #1 See staff response to Issue #10 m List 1 (Exhibit E The neighbors around and near Hillside Community Church alleged violations and called for review/revising HCC's CUP) Issue #2: Planning Commission favored the church because the number of supporters out numbered the opposition Staff Response to Issue #2 Although the Planning Commission heard testimony from the public, they approved the entitlements for Hillside Community Church with specific findings m accordance with the Development Code Issue #3• Citation to Section B 2 c of Resolution No 05-60 regarding consistency among the approved CUPs CUP 88-10 that was identical to CUP 82-29 CUP did not address changes that have risen within the 17 year period since CUP 82-29 was approved Staff Response to Issue #3 During the processing of Conditional Use Permits 82-29 and 88-10, the Planning Commission found that the project considered the nearby residential uses and concluded that the project would not be detrimental to public health, safety, welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements m the vicinity Hillside Community Church went before the Planning Commission again on July 27, 2005 for approval of DRC2004-01019 for a new sanctuary and parking structure During this last review in 2005, the new sanctuary and parking structure design were determined to be compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhood For example, the sanctuary has been designed to minimize the visual impact on the residents by using a depressed pad elevation that required 13 feet of excavation and a gable roof element that is common m residential development In addition, the A-6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH • April 25, 2007 Page 7 height of the two level parking structure is 15 feet, which is an appropriate height for structures that are adjacent to residential areas Furthermore, the two level parking structure was designed to utilize the grades on site The parking structure is built into an existing slope, which blends in with the existing slopes Also, the parking structure is locatedti,&a,f~~~t ,~,ast of the west property line that separates the church and single- family residences It will generate 0 foot candle illumination at the shared property line, which is well below the maximum permitted of five foot candles The existing landscaping onsite along with the planting of new additional landscaping will serve to soften views of the parking structure from the nearby residential area The Planning Commission found that DRC2004-01019 would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and approved the project Issue #4 (part 1) Citation to Resolution No 05-60 Section B 2 d, which stated that the field was constructed and compacted to accommodate vehicles The resident requested to see documents that confirmed that the compaction was completed Staff Response to Issue #4. During the review of Conditional Use Permit 88-10, Mr Ed Lyon, P E of RMA Group stated that he reviewed the compaction report prepared by Geosoils, Inc for the field and determined that it was sufficient to accommodate the parking of vehicles (Exhibit I) • Issue #4 (part 2). An inquiry whether it is legal for businesses to park on grass List specific examples of the City permitting parking of vehicles on grass Staff Response fo Issue #4 (part 2) Although the Municipal Code Section 17 12 030 states that parking and loading facilities shall be surfaced and maintained with asphalt concrete or other permanent, impervious surfacing material sufficient to prevent mud, dust, loose material, and other nuisances, alternate surface material can be considered by the City Planner if shown that such material will not cause adverse effects and that it will remain in a usable condition Although it is unusual for new development to incorporate parking lots on grass today, the City approved the fields in 1983 for the use as a parking lot, thus, this use has already been established Furthermore, any new additional parking stalls are provided within a parking structure • Issue #5. Inquiry if a permit for the backstop was issued Staff Response to Issue #5 The Building & Safety Department is in the process of reviewing the permits to determine if a permit for the backstop was issued Backstops are considered a compatible and appropriate installation for a ball field • Issues #6 and #7 Citation to Sections B 2 k and B 3 d of Resolution 05-60 regarding parking and findings that the project would be detrimental to public health or materially injurious to properties in the vicinity The parking structure does not blend in with the existing topography and it has visual impacts Also, the parking structure is materially injurious to properties and will lower property values A-7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH April 25, 2007 Page 8 Staff Response fo Issues #6 & #7• See staff response to Issue #6 in List 1 (Exhibit E The neighbors around & near Hillside Community Church alleged violations `and called for review/revising HCC's CUP) regarding issues with the parking structure. ' Issue #8 Citation to Section B 5 of Resolution 05-60 (Planning Departrhent' Condition Number 4) regarding noise Outdoor activities create nuisances, which will lower property values Staff Response to Issue #8 See staff response to Issues #2, #3, and #4 in List 1 (Exhibit E The neighbors around & near Hillside Community Church alleged violations and called for review/revising HCC's CUP) regarding noise issues See staff response to Issue #7 in above List 1(Exhibit E The neighbors around & near Hillside Community Church alleged violations and issue for review/revising HCC's CUP) Issue #9. Citations to Section B 5 of Resolution 05-60 (Environmental Mitigation Air Quality Conditions Numbers 1-4 and Geology and Soils Number 1) regarding construction activity as it relates to air quality and geology The resident requested to review the reports regarding soil stabilizing agents • Staff Response to Issue #9. The project is required to be treated with water or other soil-stablilizirig agents In addition, Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street are required to be swept Also, grading is required to be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25mph Although documents have not been submitted to the City, Hillside Community Church has prepared a list of activities performed by their construction contractor that describe how they have treated the site with water or soil-stablilizing agents • Issue #10 Citations to Section B 5 of Resolution 05-60 (Environmental Mitigation Noise Numbers 2 and 4) regarding construction activities as they relate to noise and haul truck deliveries The developer is required to hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring The resident requested to review the reports of the weekly noise level monitoring to be conducted by the developer Sfaff Response fo Issue #10• The project is required to comply with the Conditions of Approval regarding noise mitigation Although the list has not been submitted to the City, Hillside Community Church stated that they have complied with the noise level monitoring requirements • Issue #11. Trees (may be Spruce) are blocking views Staff Response to Issue #11 Planning Staff would like to request clarification regarding the location of the specific trees With the exception of planting London Plane Trees along the south property line, the majority of the new plantings for the new sanctuary and parking structure will occur on the interior of the site and along the public right-of-way The new trees along the southern portion of the site will serve to buffer views of the parking lot and buildings New tree species include London Plane, Strawberry Tree, and Sweet Gum All other trees on site are existing A-8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON ISSUES REGARDING HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH • April 25, 2007 Page 9 CORRESPONDENCE Since this item is not a public hearing item, a notice was not published, posted, or mailed A representative of Hillside Community Church was provided with an informal notice with information regarding the meeting RECOMMENDATION The rPiennEng Commission is requested to review the staff report and accept any public testimony and provide direction to staff Respectfully submitted, Q ~ f ~ ~, ~7 ~ ~ r:Y' v~~ 'i'ce `~ James R Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT RL/Is Attachments Exhibit A -Locator map for Hillside Community Church Exhibit B -Aerial Map for Hillside Community Church Exhibit C -Site Plan included for Development Review DRC004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, and Variance 2005- 00323 • Exhibit D -Landscaping Plan included for Development Review DRC004-01019, Variance DRC2005-00321, Variance DRC2005-00322, and Variance 2005-00323 Exhibit E -List #1 (The neighbors around and near H~llsrde Community Church Alleged violations and Issues for review/rev~s~ng HCC's CUP) provided by a resident Ms Terri Smith Exhibit F -List #2 (Questions on HCC CUP from neighbors with photos) provided by a resident, Ms Terri Smith Exhibit G -Resolution No 05-60 Exhibit H -Section 17 02 120E 1 of the Municipal Code Exhibit I -March 25, 2005 letter from RMA Group regarding utilization of existing field for auto parking • A-9 ~z • + < /t tti , ,~+f i 1 ~ ~~ "}` t5,~`'Il f '._ 7 E f T ~ + 5 j rrr.~.4 ,x r r r fi r, _ L { ....t. i i Y t tt P~~ ~`~"^ t 1' W ~~ 1~ r ~yl V r 1' d ~~ { rrr.+-+.~+r+.~++51 1 i ~ _ ~1,yt rt ,f~` , ~ J~~ ' 1 1 It \~~.7(~.. t 1t ' ~ , r , t )~ tv•`•-f~• -. .u 1 w y I 'r• ~ ~a I ,,].~, ~ 5X r '"Jh~ `~ ~ 1 ~r .~-. ~[~-~--`" ~ff ~,i`µ t 1 I~ .'"' ,k * ~~~I r t'jp7~Y} A~1_~, ~ , ,~- -.v-_..,,ff~~,,,. ~r~ ,-,.wi I' , r t t~ ~ ~~, ~ i t ~,., ~' r - ~ ~^ t ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ - I I ~ P , t ~ r' rte.. r f ~ "' H F 1 t?_ , t tF { + s d . , , ~ i7 it ~ t t \ r ..,,q / wt... t } 1 y~ f""'^`.~ ~l 'ter ~ ~e 1 II ~ w,..~.1~~ V 5 1' ,-t ,," , , f f' .. Y'} F ~ •. ,~ ~r~ i., rt \` ' h ~ t "+ r. ,..* ~ , Yt ~5 K)h' , ' ~,^.-... ~~w ~~4,.,rt?;, t ,.f ~ ~d r~ ' 1 ~ ~ t " 5 r! + t r ti ~ t ~ ~J `,d \""+ ,., "'4,,. f~- ,->rtv, .rY~ trrrr-~,wfy.,r, .,.. rr.~r }}'~'' ~ ~, err, tt ~ , t ~F~pr~Ji .1,~,.yµW r`~ at '} 4,~r' 1! t ~`T'- ,t` }. ~'~: ~ ~ , ~ } } , i ` 5 ti r"5 p' S\ Y~ „y i F ~•,*'ri ` Y +r ~~~ t \'t f t '~t r.hw~ -, -~,w,' t ` t t 5 kk~ t j} r t, spit 5Jt y ~5,; yy ` 5 it\t` t F~"--.~_til _,tt } t t 5 5 t r t t tr 5 . h 5 r, yF. t ,,~ ~`*-ti.ti , p t r.,,, ," f -- •a t~, ~ t 5 t~ .. ~t v t, 's P t> I~ f ~T ' "',~+.T~,Tm 4 { ~y t'~'..t \ ' . ~1hy~ f r ~ t` + ,t ,Y ~ i ` , -v~-. ~--~.r~rr~~ J 5 `,-~-~,--rr,l---r.r,-r- `+ 1 G b~. Y t} ll~\~~~ E ~ 5} t i{ t ~f ti "~Y44e~4L t yl-~r44w, t`.'n-,-Y.'+•."F4" Yrt. t' j i J'` '~ 'q~ t ~ -~.-~,.~,;,1 1111 ~ r .,r„~..~,r4`-+'rr.','+4r'.-.+ rr~;4".'r.4"-'rr'r.' +- rte' i ` ~ ` 4 ~ f ~"^+"•-,_`I~ .l, ~t t ~ -r+.4~'.'.-~'. r+~' ~i+rrtw~w~h'r,~r, Gr.+~rr.t +r}rh~-.+-li 1 ~ , J ,t r' ~ 1 ~ y ~~ I t +~ ~ t V +~..+,i.44V~ 1 P,.~,~Y~ ,; ~ y I-^TT i+r Nr.h-'.~ -V- 4~r i t k V ~ ~ it F d~ Ff t 111, ~ ` f 1 t V t 5 1 ~ l 4 t t , 1 Y ~ , rCt, t }'rt 't' t rt.w.,,-,.~*} I µ,-r.~.~?rrwf-~t-~-w,~'~~ t t ~ ~ ~ ~i'~r^w+~'f r.,•,r+~ 1,~r..r.w~ ...Mr,w„ wr.v. • it ~t`tt 5 ~ \ ~ r 5 t ~ 1 i it5 ~ + ~ , 51 r `~ 5 t i +ti t ~~/\J ....1.u~.~.l.-.v11.u ui ~.~W.1. ~ ~5`'}`+ 1 ,..'~F. i4_ul. ..~~.1~ \,~~u , J5t ~~` ,t ~5 t ` '~I Y r~ bM ,- ~~~ ~~T~~ ~`dHT f d-~-'~'v~~ `~H , I N--NT~ l ~-~H-~ t ..~ J t r 'lt ~ + t t~ , \ 5, ~ ' +t ,t = , , 5, j}~ 5 r4 ~ 5 . ~vwr~t~ ` ~ l ` t ~ , , \ ` t ` 5 t .4 t ,~ 5 51 5 5~ -5 t I ~G ,t'y,"~~' ~` ` ` \t I \tt `~ «. -44 t t ~iLi'N~ t ,Y1 C , t t 5 t \ t `t f r^' 5 5 "}}~~ yj:t'N 5 t t V ' t,` Vt \, t tin 5 w p ,,..,. .1~ `t t5; t ~ M1ti 1 t t 5' t ~' S t•` ~ ` 1 5` , rn V .'...' J /„ 5 5 ` t rr, ,ti ti , ` 5 , \ , ,,t5~t 5, `t 5, t 54 \ 5)t5 \ 1 p ` l t ~ 5 t t t t t 5 5 . 5\ K 3 t '+ 5+ t} , t 5 t + '" 5 t ` ~ wr ~,-:^~ tip ~ rr, w j - G war' r~ + t +~rr,,,,~, ~, ,rr' t`t tt~ ,55 5 t'>` 072YY I`5 ,~ ' t "t `y,~ t t ` t t, 5t 1 \ \ 5 l ' 1 ` ,\ }.Y.4 `1 ` t `t ` t ,4h4~ t t kt'' ,t 1 ` t ,5 5 r4Y.4'i',; r'.',++r. t i t , ~'l 1 ~ '~ {{ tl lt`` 5 5 , at t, 1' t ', t , ,'~ ~] ,`17,1 t` 1 , ` it 5r \ 555 1 r u 5 iYl'Y t t` , 1 i4',ti4ir5 ' 1 , ' ,Y,',I ' '+s ~'L,~ ~ r5' A 'af ' ` ,..s t` 1 , ; f ~ ~~ [i}i~]~ t , ` KJ['v't ` , 5 rr+i rr, ~ r-~' ` 5 V FYI ~ t5 1 ., Y T ~ t t 5 5 \ i t' ~' 1~- t, w?.~ ` , tF wr,~r=r ~ r.~r.~,+.~s-'-. E-*`~T ` \ t ,1 ~rrra?r,=,~ , ~ ~ + , ~I ~ 5 r , t~ ' I t G, 5 ~ + t t' i , t s` r.r-,-,vrr~ '1 ~~~ ," ~ i,,y~,, t5 r;,,, }, `~ 5 5 w t~ ` ~,,..--.` ;t„'''''i'~"''* ~,~r,' .~ 4r. ,s~,'.'~ ~ :..._.,.,,,,,~ ~ rw., 5 ~-r,,, 1, r`1 i, 15' t t t t 55 5+ ~ V{L 5 , t 1 t 55 J+)r, , t 5 t t+ 5 5 5 1 \` t 1 ,\ 1 t YY ~~ Y( 1` 1 1+ ~~-l 5 [}~~] ~',`r','rr 5 ` 5 5 t 5, V~)tp ~ ` `~ t v r rYrht4•n \t t i ,yY f 11 + I 1 tiI ^T t ' `5 5 5 ~ ; ,JJS~~lT r,-r ,+.`?,+t'-r~~~-+~r~~r ,i++ ' ~ .+~ i-+rw,ir,i44+5~ ~~ t t, 5,l . ` t 17 5, 1.` 5 ~ y ` ` t \~ 5` ' t t J~ t 5 t 5 5 t. 9 t 5 `fl' S. 5, ti 4~.~±arrY^^' f ` F-z-~--~--,~rr4lrr+r~ t t 5 5 5 5 5 t 5 , jli ~1 ,, t i 5 t , t 5 , t t `r4,i r , 5 t , 1 _ ~ ~4,` r~'r4«-..V,i}r.4 ~~7~ , t ' S I,J,J ' 5 , t 5 t 5 ` t ` 5 t` t ' t 5 5 `, • art?, ,,,y.; ~,,_; r, .-,-r,-kr. i ` \t , 5t 5 t , ` \ t t l ,~illi ~ ±„ t l 5 ~, t t t ` , t } 5 f t i tit \ \ ,~+` t 5,5 5 t t ~_"~,.E~~'I`r ~ jt?tr~-.~.~~"~^ lkl5 t5 5 t i ~ rr ~ t t , 1 t' 1, 55 5 t t, ~ 5 "t 5 5' (..LL.~..~.S~j ,.,ate, ~,___~ ,t ~5'. t ,}~~i t} t t 1 S t,t' ~ , 5 t t 55 5 ,yt t 55 _ t "i;--'l'\~' t flit 55t ` t~'l51 Zt,St` rry EXHIBIT A A,o • ~z ~" ~_ Z W ~_ J J 2 LL J ~_ W A-11 txhir~i~ ~ ~ g~ ~ ~ ~c ~ v ~ c t ;' ~ ~5~~ ~'~ i. ,~ O U ey~ o .ga b~ ~~ ~ ~ WW~ ~4 ~ ~ b$ I z ~ c ~ ~ o d Y d ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ W ~ hg ss p ~ a~ b_ s g 0 O I ~ r~ r _ ~ ~ . __-__ -~~ I~ t d 5 I ~\ I I e I~ IW ~~ m 0 c~ la m 5 r I ~ r 1 ,I ,. e r ~ l ~ I e EXHIBIT C ~ ~ Y p i6 ~ __ ~ C-a e€ 3i'iA3/~6N3hUH W t ~ ~ gb +e ~~ it Y ex - ~ 3 -- - --~-- II i c a N r ~ O e W ~ i F a Z ~ y 9 w ~ g I~ l e ~ ~ ~ ~ o V Z 1 ~ `~ ` ~ '' ~ ` i ~~ . ,,~i .r ~a ~~ ~ ~ r~ r~r~ _~ ~y . yM~ ~ ~F~ ,:t"CC "i`~mX ~~°16e "ee r~y~b • • A12 ~ ~ i ~~ _ 4e ~ m U~=~~~ss ~~=~:~n I=o~~j~~ ~ U o g a ~ J ~ ~ ~a ~~ g ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~_ ~~® ~~ ~~~~ ~ O f ^ . ~~ , d ~~ mod/ I I I 1 1 p q \ A ~ ~! ~ ` ?~ (~ I I I I' ~ a~ ~ 1 ~ a 1 ~ fU1 I I~ I I IpJ~ IN ~ y iI~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~6~ " ~ ~~~6 ~~~ ~ ~^ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ EXH O O O ~ , yR p ~~~ 1 ~ ~ ~. ~~~ ~ ~~ ~4~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~; ~g ~o~~ ~~ ~~ B IT D ~$R ~~ ~~~ e~~ ~ ~~g ~~~~ ~ s =~~~ ~~g~a ~1~3~ ~ ~ .b~. _o _~s .~~~ ~ qq ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ° ~ J ~ s ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ G : 3 : ~A u ~~ ~ ~ F! C t q ~ gy k k k 3 ~ ~~ J~ Q ~' ~ ~ gy ~ 4 ~~ S ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ° ~~ ~ v gg 4 ~ 2 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ s ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ s s z z a s > Rpr 04 2007 11:13RM RHTIQEGRSSTOVES 9094450311 p.2 The neighbors around & near I-Iillside Community Church Alleged violations and Issues for review/revising HCC's CUP • Issue #1 The church has been using the ball field parking for at least 2 years. Page 5 # (~ states ball field parking shall be utilized commencing with the issuance of the COP of the Sanctuary Issue # 2 A 11 rights were taken away from the home owners for any ~ . i -' peaceful enjoyment of our private property during the 1~ hours a day that the church is allowed to make noise. The CUP appears to be written using parts of the city's development code i7.2U.120 #E. The church is not a Private School Page 4 # (4) Issae #3 The public naisance caused by the outdoor sporting events. The noise levels are well above community standards. Page 3#(D) materially injurious to properties Issue #4 Outdoor spectator cheering and or the use of amplified noise and use of bullhorns concerts, movies & recreational games Outdoor over night camp outs HCC is not a Private School Page 4 #(4} Anyone else has to receive a special use permit for this type of activity. Issue #5 Did anyone look into long term parkutg at Chafrey. I~ow can ~t be guaranteed that Chaffey will renew parking lease in 5 years Page 2 #(H} Issue #6 The 2 level parking structure that is not consistent with a resident neighborhood. Page 3#(D) materially in jurioas to properties Issue #7 Dirt pile that was at one time over 30 feet tall was not covered with plastic or watered down. Page 6 #(1-4) Issue #8 Tree removal we the neighbors saw the trees removed bat never saw the 16 trees transplanted Fage 4 #(1) Issue #9 The noise was unbearable at first phase of constractioa. Rocks were being damped into tracks metal trailers starting at 7:t10 ANI city was called no change of noise. Page 11#(2) Issue #10 Conflict of interest with Brad Boller being City Planner and a member of HCC and now Mr. Buller works at HCC.s EXHII~IT E A14 Questions on HCC CUP from neighbors #1 Conflict of interest Brad Buller City Planner and now works for HCC. • #2 Planning Commission did not listen the the neighbors voices over church members voices. Only about 50 of us 1400 or more of them. Not equal rights. #3 Page 1 #(C) CUP 88-10 which is identical to CUP 82=29. Shouldn't things be changed in 17 years to adjust to the neighborhood and problems that have risen within the 17 years of original CUP? Why was this not addressed? #4 Page 2 #(d) This ball field was constructed and compacted to accommodate vehicles. We want to see the proof. #4 Part 2 Is it legal for any other church or any other business in the city to park on non paved areas such as GRASS? We would like to see the statue that allows this. And see where this applies anywhere else in the city. ~~ want to see permit that shows backstop was written off (per neighborhood ossi it never was) g P #6 Page 3 #(k) Parking sturcture: thereby blending into the existing topography and minimizing the visual impact. See photos it does not blend in. #7 Page 3 #(d) The ugly parking structure is Materially injurious to properties. This will lower our property values #8 Page 4 #(4) Outdoor activities.This will lower our property values because of having to list the noise nuisance in disclosers when selling homes. ~ #9 Page 6 #1-2-3-4-) &Page 8 #(1) We want to see the reports on the soil stabilizing agents ~ BIT F X10 Pa a 11 # 2 & # 4 We want see re orts EXH I g () () P ~~~~~ ~ Jry~~ // \ i~ 1 f ~ ~ I / =_~"_ ___ ~_ - -_ /'s.~ll~~ ~-r/6rr- ~ ~m~ t ~~ nl ~ a - Y "i Mf ~, ,1, ~° t u • r K'h' ~ Y~wy '~}T ~ ~ ~~~ i roi ~ F `lam • • A16 ^~11'~~ ~ • __ ~ r • ~, ~1 1 +r • w `' -(`'•. :lit; `~:. ], ~~ ~ _ ~ ~ t .;~; ~,~, -. - -.w *- ...- ~° ~/ ~~~ 5 ~t I ~~~ r ,nom ~. { ~, r ~µ* r A17 • • A18 • RESOLUTION NO 05-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2004-01019, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 76,019 SQUARE FOOT WORSHIP CENTER AND A 101 STALL PARKING STRUCTURE ON 8 86 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1 to 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND VISTA GROVE STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN 1074-271-01 A Recitals 1 Hillside Community Church filed an application for approval of DRC2004-01019, as described in the title of this Resolution Hereinafter m this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application " 2 On the 27th day of July 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application 3 All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows 1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct 2 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on July 27, 2005, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows a The application applies to the development of a sanctuary building totaling 76,019 square feet and a 101 stall, bi-level parking structure on 8 86 acres of land located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street, and b The property to the north of the subject site is developed with single-family dwelling units, the property to the south is developed with future single-family dwelling units, the property to the east, across Haven Avenue, is developed with asingle-family dwelling units, and the propertyto the west is developed with single-family dwelling units, and c The church site was originally approved under Conditional Use Permit 82-29 on February 9, 1983 On September 28, 1988, Conditional Use Permit 88-10, which was identical to Conditional Use Permit 82-29, with the exception of the architectural design of the sanctuary, was approved along with a Master Plan and the issuance of a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts Conditional Use Permit 88-10 also included the master plan for the church In 1994, the . church completed its first permanent building, the Family Center, which is amulti-purpose building that is presently used for worship services, and exHieir G F„ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 2 d The applicant is proposing to construct a 76,019 square foot worship center, which includes administrative offices, classrooms, and a 13,125 square foot sanctuary The proposed sanctuary is in substantial compliance with the approved master plan (Conditional Use Permit 88-1~0) ~ The proposed 1,400-seat sanctuary is actually smaller than the 1,500-seat sanctuary that `- ~' was ori~irially approved The current proposal, as all previously approved proposals, includes the use of the lower (south) ball field for parking This ball field was constructed and compacted to accommodate vehicles The two portable buildings that function as Sunday school classrooms will be removed with the construction of the new sanctuary Also proposed is a bi-level parking structure that will provide 101 parking stalls The parking structure has been designed to maximize the use of the grades on the site, with the first level being underground and built into an existing slope The second level will take access from the north parking lot The parking structure has been designed to blend with the proposed sanctuary and the existing Family Center buildings, utilizing a river rock base on the south and west elevations Landscape slopes buttressed by a keystone retaining wall surround the three exposed sides (west, south, and east elevations) of the parking structure • e The applicant conducted four neighborhood meetings to inform the surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed protect and to obtain their feedback Residents from the surrounding area attended the meetings and provided design suggestions that improved the protect and minimized the impact of the sanctuary building As result of the neighborhood meetings, the applicant made changes to the sanctuary height, building pad elevation, and modified the protect to include a bi-level parking structure and the installation of the 6-foot high sound wall at the south property line, and . f The sanctuary will have a seating capacity of 1,400 persons In 1988, Conditional Use Permit 88-10 was approved, which included a master plan fora 1,500-person sanctuary in the same location as the 1,400-person sanctuary, and g The project, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and h The protect requires 375 parking stalls, per the requirements of the Development for churches The protect has been design with 392 paved stalls, 155 ball field stalls, and a satellite parking lot at Chaffey College with shuttle services to the church that provides an additional 400 stalls The total amount of parking stalls available on-site is 547 In addition, the church has a lease with Chaffey College to use their parking lots, via shuttle service, for an additional parking capacity of 400 spaces The overall amount of parking stalls available (on-site plus satellite lot at Chaffey College) is 947 stalls, and i A photometric study was completed to ensure that the upper level of the parking structure and the expansion of the existing parking lot would not cause glare on the single-family dwelling units located west and south of the church property The parking structure is located 60 feet east of the west property line that separates the church and the single-family residences The parking structure will generate azero-foot candle illumination at the shared properly line, which is well under the maximum permitted of 5-foot candles The expansion of the grade level parking lot at the south property line will result in a maximum of 20-foot candle illumination on the residential properties south of the parking lot, which is well under the maximum permitted of 5-foot candles, and • A 20 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH • July 27, 2005 Page 3 t The project has been designed with reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) that will function as retention basins in order to ensure that the on-site storm drain system is adequate and will not exceed the capacity of the existing culvert at the southwest corner of the property, and k The project hasbeen designed with a 101-stall, b~-level parking structure that has been designed to maximize the use of the grades on the site, with the first level being underground and built into an existing slope, thereby blending into to the existing topography and minimizing the visual impact, and I The sanctuary design has been designed to blend with the existing multi-purpose building, utilizing rock cobble Further, the sanctuary has been designed to minimize the visual impact on the residents to the north by being designed with a depressed pad elevation that requires 13 feet of excavation and a gable roof element that is common in residential neighborhoods 3 Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby speaficaily finds and concludes as follows a That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan and Development Code, and • b That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located, and c That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, and d That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements m the vicinity 4 Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessmentfor the application, the Planning Commission finds that there rs no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows a That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared m compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission, and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application b Although the Mitigated Negative Declaration identifies certain significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved, all significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level by imposition of mitigation measures on the project which are listed below as conditions of approval A21 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 • Page 4 c Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753 5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the protect, there is no evidence that the proposed protect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon vvhich wildlife depends Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth m Section 753 5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations 5 Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subtect to each and every condition set forth below and m the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Planning Department 1) Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00382 is hereby approved for the removal of 122 trees for the development of the worship center parking lot and parking structure Per the arborist report on fife with the Planning Department, 16 trees shall be transplanted elsewhere on-site Ninety-five new trees shall be planted, comprised of 3 species (London Plane, Strawberry, and Sweetgum) All new tree species shall be • 24-inch box size The Tree Removal Permit shall be valid for 90 days from the date of Building Permit issuance The precise Grading Plan submitted for plan check shall include an exhibit indicating the 122 trees to be removed and the 16 trees to be relocated 2) All improvements including, but not limited to, the sanctuary, the parking lot, the parking structure, and landscaping shall be completed in one phase Phasing of the improvements is not permitted 3) The protect shall be developed m accordance with plans approved by the Design Review Committee on May 31, 2005, on file with the Planning Department 4) All outdoor activities that involve spectator cheering and/or the use of amplified sound systems including, but not limited to, sports activities, concerts, movies, and recreational games, shall not commence priorto 7 a m and shall terminate by 10 p m Outdoor overnight campouts are - permitted, provided that no amplified sound during the hours of 10 p m to 7 a m and that the activity is within the acoustical requirements of the Development Code during the hours of 10 p m to 7 a m 5) At the parking structure, climbing vines shall be planted at the base of the concrete columns at the top of the landscape slopes Parthenocissus tricuspidata (Boston Ivy), or alternative species approved by the Planning Department during plan check, shall be used A 22 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH • July 27, 2005 Page 5 6) Ball field parking shall be utilized commencing with the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the sanctuary Bali~field parking shall be managed in accordance with the report on file with the Planning Department dated April 7, 2005, that calls for the use of cones, flags, and parking lot attendants ,i 7) For evening services using the ball field parking, the church shall provide suffiaent number of parking lot attendants with flashlights to safely direct traffic 8) A 6-foot high sound wall shall be constructed along the entire south property line in order to mitigate sound from the ball fields The sound wall shall be constructed m accordance with specifications outlined by acoustical consultants McKay Conant and Brook dated February 16, 2005 The plans submitted for plan check shall indicate the sound wall and ail necessary details and cross-sections 9) Single-tier bleachers shall be utilized at the south ball fields for noise attenuation purposes Single-tier bleachers shall be installed prior to the Certificate of Occupancy for the sanctuary • 10) All parking lot fixtures shall not exceed 15 feet m height and shall be compatible with the existing parking lot fixtures The final design shall be subject to City Planner review and approval during plan check 11) A photometric diagram shall be submitted during plan check demonstrating that illumination levels from the project site are consistent with approved plans on file with the Planrnng Department Building & Safety Department 1) The maximum discharge for the existing culvert at the southwest corner of the property shall be 13 7 cubic feet per second (CFS) A Final Drainage Study determining the precise size of the underground pipes for retention purposes shall be provided during plan check to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety plan check engineer Engmeennq Department 1) Install missing street improvements, if any, along Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street per City standards, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Street Improvements include, but are not limited to, sidewalk, street trees, community trail, drive approaches, access ramps, and curbside drain outlets 2) On Vivienda Street, upgrade curbside drain outlet as required The Drainage Study for the on-site retention facilities shall be reviewed by City Engineer as well as Building and Safety prior to Grading Permit issuance A 23 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 • Page 6 3) Include the Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Water ' Quality Management Plan (WOMP) on Grading Plans when submitted for plan check 4) Do not install concrete walkway across the Community Trail Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agents (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PMio) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 2) Haven Avenue and Vista Grove Street shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions assoaated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed . 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and protected equipment use Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the protect Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff 7) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108 A 24 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH • July 27, 2005 Page 7 9) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions on Grading Plans and initiate on-site when appropriate or as soon as feasible • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i e ,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) m accordance with Rule 403 requirements • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means 10) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible 11) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 12) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters 13) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will A 25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 8 Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point • Pursue educating the public about the area's archaeological heritage • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving • 2) A qualified paleontologist shall conduct a preconstruction field survey of the protect site The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings • that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i e , paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum Geology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) daily to reduce PM~o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with A 26 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH . July 27, 2005 Page 9 vehicle tracking of soil off-site Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to ail inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included m grading plan, and • implemented for the proposed protect that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time of ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site oroff-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from -the site - 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the WQMP prepared by Dan Guerra & Associates (May 2005) to reduce pollutants after construction is complete from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth Plans for these areas, A 27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019-HJLLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 10 including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits ,7 7) Roof Runoff Controls Pollutants picked up from roofing materials and atmospheric depositions during roof storm water runoff shall pass through a water quality device located at catch basins 8) Efficient Irrigation Irrigation systems shall include features such as flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines The landscaping areas will be grouped with plants that have similar water requirements Native or drought species shall also be used where appropriate to reduce excess irrigation runoff and promote surface filtration. 9) Storm Drain Signage All storm drain inlets and catch basins shall have stenciling or labeling "Keep Gutters Clean For Those Downstream " Legibility of stencils and signs must be maintained • 10) Trash Storage Areas The trash storage areas will be paved with an impervious surface to mitigate spills The trash container areas will also be walled to prevent off-site transport of trash The container floor • will be graded such that storm water runoff will flow out of the structure Ponding will not occur within the trash enclosure Trash containers shall have lids or an awning to prevent rainfall from entering containers In addition, storm water runoff from adjoining roofs and pavement must be diverted around the trash area and signs should be posted informing users that hazardous materials are not to be disposed of therein 11) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval, a WQMP, including a protect description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004 12) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board Evidence that this has been obtained (t e a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit A 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 11 Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any _ time on Sunday or a national holiday • 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120-D, as measured at the property line The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitonng as specified in Development Code Section 17 02 120 Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours, however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted 3) The wall at the south property line shall be constructed as early as possible 4) Haul truck delivenes shall not take place between the hours of 8 00 p m and 6 30 a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday Additionally, ~ heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily tnps (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings 6 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF JULY 2005 PLANNING COMMISSION OF BY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cias, Chairma ATTEST Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary I, Dan Coleman, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and A 29 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 05-60 DRC2004-01019- HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH July 27, 2005 Page 12 Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of July 2005, by the following vote-to-wit AYES COMMISSIONERS FLETCHER, MACIAS, McNIEL, McPHAIL NOES COMMISSIONERS NONE ABSENT COMMISSIONERS STEWART • • A 30 1 ~ CIZ 12~ Noise abatement 9/1 /06 3 1 6 PM l tie 17 DEVELCPMENT_COL?E Chapter_17 02 ADM1NlSTRATI4N 17 02 120 Noise abatement A Purpose In order to control unnecessary, excessive, and annoying noise and vibration in the city, it is declated to be the policy of the city to prohibit such noise generated from or by all sources as specified in this section B Decibel Measurement Criteria Any decibel measurement made pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be based on a reference sound pressure of twenty micro-pascals as measured wrth a sound level meter using the "A" weighted network (scale) at slow response C Designated Noise Zones The properties hereafter descnbed are hereby assigned the following noise zones Noise Zone I All single and multiple family residential properties Noise Zone II All commercial properties D Extenor Noise Standards unlawful for any person at any location within the city to create any noise or allow the creation of any noise on the property o ,leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled by such person, which causes the noise level when measured on the property line of any other property to exceed the basic noise level as adjusted below a Basic noise level for a cumulative penod of not more than fifteen minutes in any one hour, or b Basic noise level plus five dBA for a cumulative penod of not more than ten minutes in any one hour, or c Basic noise level plus fourteen dBA for a cumulative penod of not more than five minutes in any one hour, or d Basic noise level plus fifteen dBA at any time 2 If the measurement location is a boundary between two different noise zones, the lower noise level standard shall apply 3 If the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or stopped for a time period whereby the ambient noise level can be determined, the measured noise level obtained while the noise is in operation shall be compared directly to the allowable noise level standards as specified respective to the measurement's location, designated land use, and for the time of day the noise level is measured The reasonableness of temporanly discontinuing the noise generation by an intruding noise source shall be determined by the city planner for the purpose of establishing the existing ambient noise level at the measurement location E Special Provisions The following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of this section 1 City- or school-approved activities conducted on public parks, public playgrounds, and public or pnvate school grounds including, but not limited to, athletic and school entertainment events between the hours of seven a m and ten p m , 2~sional outdoor gathenngs, dances, shows, and sporting and entertainment events, provided said events are conducted p ant to the approval of a temporary use permit issued by the city, 3 Any mechanical device, apparatus or equipment usprt ~~iated to or connected with emergency machinery, vehicle, work or ttp //municipalcodes lexisnexis cc EXH ~ g IT H i~t31 17_02_ADMINISTRATION/17_02_120_Noise_abatement_ html Page 1 of 2 02 12~,.~ Noise abatement 9/1 /06 3 16 PM wamin~ alarm or bell, provided the sounding of arty bell or alarm on any budding or motor vehicle shall terminate its operation wnthin thirty minutes in any hour of its being activated, 4 Noise sources assoaated month, or vibration created by, construction, repair, remodeling or grading of any real property or dunng authorized seismic surveys, provided said activities do not take place between the hours of eight p m and six-thirty a m • on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, and provided noise levels created do not exceed the noise standard of sixty-five dBA plus the limits specified in Section 17 02 120(D)(1), 5 All devices, apparatus or equipment associated with agricultural operations provided a Operations do not take place between eight p m and seven a m on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, or - b Such operations and equipment are utilized for protection or salvage of agricultural crops dunng periods of potential or actual frost damage or other adverse weather conddions, or c Such operations and equipment are associated with agricultural pest control through pesticide application, provided the application is made in accordance with permits issued by, or regulations enforced by, the California Department of Agriculture, 6 Noise sources associated with the maintenance of real property, provided said activities take place between the hours of eight a m and eight p m on any day except Sunday or between the hours of nine a m and eight p m on Sunday, 7 Any activity to the extent regulation thereof has been preempted by state or federal lew F Schools, Churches, Utxanes, Health Care Instrtutrons-Speaal Provisrons It is unlawful for any person to create any noise which causes the noise level at any school, hospital or similar health care institution, church, or library while the same is in use, to exceed the noise standards specified in this section and prescribed for the assigned noise zone in which the school, hospital, church or library is located G Administration Any act creating or permitting the creation of a noise disturbance as defined by this code, not otherwise excluded by the preceding section of this code, shall constitute a violatron of this code and shall be abated as such H Prima Faae Volation Any noise exceeding the noise level standards for a designated noise zone as specified in this section • shall be deemed to be puma facie evidence of a violation of the provisions of this section (Ord 211 § 6 (part), 1983) « previQUS ~ ne » tp //muniapalcodes lexfsnexis coin/codes/rartchocu/_DATA/TITLEI 7/Cha~c3217_02_ADMINISTRATION/17_02_120_Noise_abatement_ html Page 2 of 2 RMa 10851 EDISON COURT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 (909) 989-1751 FAX (909) 989-4287 March 25, 2005 W L C Architects Virginia Dare Tower 10470 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention Larry Wolff Subject Proposed Uhhzation of Existing Baseball Field for Auto Parking Hillside Community Church 5354 Haven Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA Gentlemen At your request, we have reviewed the geotechmcal feasibility of utilizing an existing baseball • field on the lower pad of Hillside Community Church for automobile parking Geosoils, Inc prepared a compaction report during the original grading of the church facility m 1993 Their report indicates that soils within pad areas were compacted to at least 90% of their maximum dry density Accordingly, it is expected that the soil will be able to bear the weight of automobiles, although tires could leave ruts if the ground is saturated when used for parking or if landscaping loosened soils If necessary, it is expected that this could be mitigating by recompactmg surface soils We trust this letter will serve your needs at this time In you have any questions or require further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us Respectfully, President GE 2362 RMA oup .~y Ed Ly n, PE • RMA Job No 04-314-O1 A 33 Yahoos ~Aall - calpa12002@yahoo com Yahc.. ~~ ~, 7 ~' r ; 4_++I+l Make Y! vour home oaae A~,~,I~+pC.3t~ MAIL Welcome, calpa12002 ,~ [ i n u My Account) PJt«'I Addresses Calendar Notepad Check Mad Compose 03/01/2007 11 OS AM *e Kjr~+~ Web Se~reh Mad Home Mad Tutonais - Helo Mafl For Mobile - MaU UOOrades - ODtlons A~ Search Mad Search the Web' ` Earn a degree In less than 1 yr Piev~ous i V xt ! flack to Messaoes ~ p Y Delete Re i Forward Move Folders (Add Edit] Thls message Is not flagged [Flag Message - Maik as Unread Inbox (4) Da te 'r++ 1 Sep 2006 t4 51 36 0700 (PUT) Draft From Cal Pal ~calpa12002Cmyahoo comma r~' ~ Add to Address Book ,4 nod Mobile Alert Sent Su bject Fwd Fw Materials on Htllside Communrty Church BUIk IErnpty) To cookmm~antiquegasstoves com Trash lEmpty) Search Shortcuts My Photos My Attachments _- _ REXD GUTIERREZ <rand~884@msn.com> wrote: v6 ~ a See your credit score free > From: "REXD GUTIERREZ" <rand~884@msn.eom> a Earnadegiee ~ ' > To: <ca1pa12002@yahoo.com> Inlyr ~ > Subject: Fw: Materials on Hillside Community Church Mortgage Rate ~ 4 625'% > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:12:24 -0700 Degrees m as > fast as 1 year > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: James L. Markman > To: rand~884@msn.com > Cc: slam@ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 11:46 AM > Subject: Materials on Hillside Community Church > Rex, I have reviewed the materials you provided to > me last night which emanated from neighbors of the > church. Those materials are consistent with > complaints already made to the City planning staff. > Of course, I cannot comment on the accuracy of the > facts alleged. But, assuming the facts are stated > accurately, I believe the neighbors have legal > remedies which the city or the neighbors could > pursue. The two avenues available include enforcing > the city noise ordinance and/or seeking to enjoin > those parts of the Church activities which > constitute a public nuisance. I think the neighbors Printable V+ew http //us f317 mall yahoo com/ym/ShowLetter~Msgld=7496_0_63601_ ta=yes&Inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=5&vlew=aBehead=b&box=Sent Page 1 of 2 Yahoos Mail - calpa12002@yahoo com Check Mail Compose 03/01/2007 11 OS AM > were correct in questioning the interpretation staff > has given on the applicability of the noise > standards to church activities and I have so > informed the staff. Further, the neighbors are > correct in assuming that the city's ordinances do > not trump or render ineffective state code nuisance > provisions. Those provisions can be enforced by the > neighbors through private litigation against the > church. If a public nuisance (one affecting numerous > families) can be shown to exist, the city could > bring such a suit. A nuisance suit is a remedy in > addition to and independant of code enforcement > measures available to the city. I hope this e mail > is reponsive to your request. I am copying Jack so > that he and the full Council are aware of these > responses. > NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or > other confidential information. If you are not the > intended recipient of this communication, or an > employee or agent responsible for delivering this > communication to the intended recipient, please > advise the sender by reply email and immediately > delete the message and any attachments without > copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. Do You Yahoo!? Tired of seam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http : / /mail_. yahoo. com Delete Reply Forward Move Previ us I ~ i Back to MC55aQe5 Save Messaoe Text I full Headers T Search Mail Search the Web Copyright © 1994-2007 Yahoos inc All rights reserved Terms of Service CopyrighUlP Policy Gwdelines Ad Feedback NOTICE We collect personal Information on this site To learn more about how we use your information see our Privacy Policy http //us f317 mail yahoo com/ym/ShowLetter~Msgld=7496_0_63601_ ta=yes&Inc=25&order=down&sort=date&pos=5&wew=aBehead=b&box=Sent Page 2 of 2 Hillside Community Church Nome Paae Who We Are Community Event Calendar Contact Us CtR~~rr-h ~#~f~ Hillside History ~ztct'te6~36 nt- ELF ~ aEt&~ '~~r€~ 'Ja4~~c~~ 1979 -First Worship service 1980 - Dr Burns begins ministry 1994 -Family Center constructed 1995 -Sports fields constructed 03/09/2007 O1 24 PM teed -1C~e' ~°~#'S~.£Df'4~ Hillside traces its roots to a group of couples who were attending First Baptist Church of Pomona As they began to move their families to the Rancho Cucamonga area, they sensed a need for new churches in a rapidly growing community After further research and an initial meeting of interested participants, the group held its first worship service in June of 1979 Facilities were rented at Chaffey College, and Dr Don Thomas, a retired seminary professor, came to assist the fledging group in its early organizational phase This pioneering group set out to find its first pastor Dr David Burns accepted the call and began his ministry with Hillside in 1980 Hillside Community Church officially chartered with 51 members After a couple of years of steady growth, the opportunity to purchase land presented itself In conjunction with the American Baptist Churches of the Pacific Southwest, a 10 acre site at the top of Haven Avenue was secured as Hillside's future home A master plan was developed and approved by the city of Rancho Cucamonga, and the first phase of a building plan was initiated The first move entailed the placement of a modular building for both worship and educational needs As Hillside continued to grow, it became apparent that permanent and larger facilities were needed Additional modulars were purchased and then in 1994 the Family Center, Hillside's first permanent building, was constructed Within a year, Hillside made a bold move and raised the funds to construct the present sports fields, now used for its expanding sports program Through the years, God has provided additional staff members who have led the way in developing the many active ministries evident today at Hillside The theme of our entire building program, from start to finish, has been, UPWARD BOUND, and as the Tourney continues, the theme still rings true "But one thing I do Forgetting what is behind and straining toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Christ Jesus " [Philippians 3 13] http //www hillsideministry org/history html Page 1 of 1 CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on April 11, 2007, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission continued the following item(s) to its meeting to be held on May 9, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00444 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Victoria Community Plan Land Use Map and applicable text sections from High Density Residential to Mixed Use for consistency with the existing General Plan on 14 33 acres of land (commonly known as the Joseph Filippi Winery), located at 12467 Base Line Road -APN 0227-161-10, 0227-161-24 and 1089-581-04 Related files Landmark Alteration DRC2007-00150 and Development Agreement DRC2005-00361 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND MASTER PLAN DRC2005-00361 - PITASSI ARCHITECTS - A proposal to develop a master plan and development agreement to guide the development of the 14 33 acres of land (commonly known as the Joseph Filippi Winery) located at 12467 Base Line Road -APN 0227-161-10, 0227-161-24 and 1089-581-04 Related files Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2006-00444 and Landmark Alteration DRC2007-00150 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration The meeting will be held at 7 00 p m in the Council Chambers at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California Said continuance was passed by the following vote Ayes FLETCHER, MUNOZ, STEWART Noes NONE Absent MACIAS, Abstain NONE Date April 12, 2007 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Lois J Schrader, declare as follows I am the Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, that at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on April 11, 2007, said public hearing was opened and continued to the time and place specified m the NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE shown above, and that on April 12, 2007, at the hour of 4 00 p m , a copy of said notice was posted m a conspicuous place near the door m which said meeting was held I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed on April 12, 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Lois J Sch er Planning Commission Secretary CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on April 11, 2007, the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservation Commission continued the following item to its meeting to be held on May 9, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND LANDMARK ALTERATION DRC2007-00150 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A Landmark Alteration request to allow exterior modifications for architectural enhancements to the Historic Ellena-Regina Winery on 14 33 acres of land (commonly known as the Joseph Filippi winery) located at 12467 Base Line Road - APN 0227-161-10, 0227-161-24 and 1089-581-04 Related files Development Agreement DRC2005-00361 and Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2006-00444 Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration The meeting will be held at 7 00 p m in the Council Chambers at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California Said continuance was passed by the following vote Ayes FLETCHER, MUNOZ, STEWART Noes NONE Absent MACIAS Abstain NONE Date April 12, 2007 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Lois J Schrader, declare as follows I am the Historic Preservation Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, that at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on April 11, 2007, said public hearing was opened and continued to the time and place specified in the NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE shown above, and that on April 12, 2007, at the hour of 4 00 p m , a copy of said notice was posted in a conspicuous place near the door in which said meeting was held I declare under penalty of penury that the foregoing is true and correct Executed on April 12, 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Lois J Schra(~r Historic Preservation Commission Secretary