No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008/05/28 - Agenda Packet - Planning Commission,~ RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MAY 28, 2008 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER .>% :- . Roll Call Chairman Stewart Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz_ Howdyshell _ Wimberly • • .;a~ ... II: , ANNOUNCEMENTSE,``, :.::..........::.:~~> .. ~~ ~ ~ III:` '. ~ PRESENTATIONS'~'~ "~~~~ ~ `_~~ PRESENTATION REGARDING LINEAR BUFFER PARKS BY CAL POLY POMONA SCHOOL OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE STUDENTS IV. ' 'APPROVAL OF 1VLiN~UTES ~~ " ~ ~ '~` ` "~~ . May 14, 2008 Regular Meeting Minutes I~ V. ' CONSENT CALENDAR. ; ' " The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission atone time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. 1 of 5 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA May 28, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA - : VL' PUBLICH~E9RINGS ~.~';'-.;:°-, ._ ~`~~:'~~...) The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in affer speaking. A. SECOND • TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND PINEHURST INC. -A request for a time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map to subdivide 150.79 acres into 359 lots in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Very-Low (0.1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts, with an average density of 2.3 dwelling units per acre for the entire project, in the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and East Avenue. APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 20. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2002-00156, Annexation DRC2002-00865, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00461. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by City Council in June 16, 2004 by Resolution 04-204 and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report. B. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00064 - MERITAGE HOMES, LLC. -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 55 single family lots on 14.50 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, east of the Southern California Edison Corridor APN: 0225-071-47. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 and Development Review DRC2005-00986. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. • 2 of 5 ~J • • PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA May 28, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA C. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17433 -DAT TA - A request to subdivide 2.39 gross acres of land into 9 lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 9814 Church Street, which is on the north side of Church Street, 140 feet west of Pasito Avenue -APN: 1077-311-74. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, which covers in-fill development within certain criteria. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Related files: Development/Design Review DRC2005-00490 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00491. D. DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2005-00490 -DAT TA-A proposal to develop nine single-family homes on 2.39 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 9814 Church Street, which is on the north side of Church Street, 140 feet west of Pasito Avenue -APN: 1077-311-74. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, which covers in-fill development within certain criteria. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17433 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00491. ~~ VII: DIRECTOR'S~~~REPORTS`~~; :'~'.~.:~ .~ , ,~~,.~:~` .::-~;~~~ E. ENGINEERING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008/09 ~~ VIII. PUBLIC COMMENTS': ~~. -. .. :III This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. I IX:. 'COMMISSION BUSINESS/COMMENTS ~ III 3 of 5 _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA May 28, 2008 RANCHO cUCAMONGA X. ADJOURNIVIENT ' ~ ~ : ,~~ ~. ' ~~:.~ :>_` ~ ~. _~ ~ - The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 22, 2008, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. L/-! If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. • • 4 of 5 • • _ PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA May 28, 2008 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The Planning Commission Secretary receives all such items. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,039 for maps and $2,141 for all other decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas and minutes can be found at http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us 5 of 5 Vicinity Map Planning Commission May 28, 2008 Q ~ Meeting Location: " City Hall 10500 Civic Center Drive • RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: May 28, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Barbara Tuncay, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: SECOND TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND PINEHURST INC. - A request for a time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map to subdivide 150.79 acres into 359 lots in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Very-Low (0.1-2 dwelling units per acre) Residential Districts, with an average density of 2.3 dwelling units per acre for the entire project, in the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and East Avenue. APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, • 15, 16, and 20. Related Files: Development Agreement DRC2002-00156, Annexation DRC2002-00865, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2003-00461. Staff found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by City Council in June 16, 2004, by Resolution 04-204 and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 on June 16, 2004, fora 3-year period. The applicant applied for and received a time extension on June 13, 2007, from the Planning Commission fora 1-year time extension for the project. This is the second request fora 12-month time extension. There have been no changes to the City's development standards since these maps were approved. ANALYSIS: A. Subdivision Mao: On January 6, 1999, the City Council amended the City's Subdivision Ordinance to establish a 3-year initial approval period for tract and parcel maps (increased from 2 years previously). The amendment also allows the Planning Commission to grant time extensions in 12-month increments for up to 5 years (a maximum of 8 years from the original time approval), which is the maximum allowed under the State Subdivision Map Act Section 66452.69 (e). The maximum life of this project would be up to 8 years from the date of approval (final expiration on June 16, 2012). B. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") • and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City certified an Environmental Impact Report on June 16, 2004, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION FOR SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND PINEHURST INC. May 28, 2008 Page 2 • Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequentorsupplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated the time extension request and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified EIR. The proposed time extension request does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental I mpact Report for the tract map. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The project was developed with a development agreement for the 359-lot subdivision. The site plan, building elevations, and development conditions for the proposed project are included in the development agreement and are generally consistent with the Development Code and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection • with the City's consideration of the time extension. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission grant a 1-year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. Respectfully submitted, . ~~ cy~ / ~~ James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:BT\ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Letter from the Applicant dated March 11, 2008 Exhibit B -Vicinity Map Exhibit C -Tentative Map Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension for Tentative Tract Map • SUBTT16072 A-2 J ~RICHLAND C O M M U N I T I E S • March 11, 2008 Ms. Candyce Burnett Senior Planner City of Ranch Cucamonga 1500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 Re: Tentative Tract Mao No. 16072 Request for Tentative Tract Map Extension of Time Deaz Candyce: We hereby request a time extension for Tentative Tract Map No. 16072 to allow us time to complete the processing of all of our environmental permits. Should you have questions please contact us. Sincerely, John Schafer Senior Vice President • 4100 Newport Place • Suite 800 • Newport Beach, California 92660 • 949/261-7010 • Fax 949/261-7016 A-3 u • ~.~...,.:_ ~F 51~ ~~ ~ rii~,~r,d?;/i` ~ iY~r ~4 Ji/f'/li ~~'/ ~l ~ ~` ~ ~' ~ =::cJ Il ' , ~ Yr .-~ 1 \\ ~ ` ~~ ~,I _ ~{~ _ a~ ) G . `_ ` _. ai,a ~~ ~ 1 ..-_-r :+~ ~ ~ ~`f'// ~~ n• y ~%! " , r a ~ ~Z~ ~\ `. r .J ~..,~ ~')I ) ~ ~ ~ ?•'~/ISIS--_. \~ arid ~ ^ 1.:='~.~ 1 :~ I ~ b~ '/-~" ~`-" s ~° ~ ~' ~ ~~~ f~ / ` Sri ,\~ ~ it _~:~_ ~ ~ ~'~'~ f .\'•\ t ! '~- :;-~~' _ _ ~ -,,.,.~ A~~.~f. ,..~~! ~~ ~ `.. ~:,.,...~ ,., ~-1 -: ,~ >Irr 5 ~. , ' (? :~ ,- l 1 r,~: .-. l-;.~:•~ ~r~-«~ i. 4~ ~ s 'rf ~ ,~\ {,flit<<~~;',;, ~: ~r• n _ _ ' ~.1 5,. Ir',' ;y.~ fr'vw=' i- I~t'•!1~, - l~ ;, \,Y J~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~InI/' ~ ~ ` l~~ f ~:;_%,% r ~{ ~ - + IJI~ /`' rn _Jr _,,'l }` ~l mr crr. Jr ~;ypr~`°'- y-S;~ `50'._./i`;_J ,.,~`,/' ,I // (, ;_~lf '~•- \I ;'%fl~j ~ r ~ ' ' f /- - ~^~ _ _ __ j _ J - s~o- Y _ .~_ - ...^ O . ~ _ _~ .i 1 ~f ~i - `~ ~/ / ~~ 111 1 ~. ~ ~ ^~~ _ ,-~IIYY '~ '-' - _' -- _~'_ e ~ - - = Jr ~ _ - ~ti_ r - l-' _ P~~~ ~yq ~ ~ _ - - __ ~ _ ~~ I ~ ! ~ ~ ) _ -~' ~ _ _, _ -- ,_~,_. „~ { - 1~na®taols Richland Communities, Iac 4100~Nnpa't ~PlOea. SuBe 800 Nnpart Bexh G 82680-11W Ph: (949) 261-7010 ~ !0101 2fi1-7016 XHIBIT B 0 ~~ 0 0 0 TENTATIVE TRACT. No. 16072 USGS QUADRANGLE VICINITY MAP cmr ~ «,cn OF 6t4N ee~+nr>a+o: Brae of cu,~n A-4 B~AUiCCs uem 7•s Dung CucnuoNOA rFJUc ~t ~t I ~'1~ . t I ~ 911s=~ ii IIW15iie EXHIBIT C ~,, ,;~fff~ ~t„f# ~tatattr ,;77fa#'en~ IfBfaflp i i I Ilry 1~ ~ tt~~~~III.t1 III l~tlllQ~ l~IIII~~ .,I~~I ~~NI ~~IIl11lII I:.....1 n ~~ ( ~, ~ 1 I , 0 1 m~tny,,y ~ia°°w'66' ~ ~>~lil ~s~~l ~' I~ImWI ~ ~fef~ ~eeu ~ ~,~~~ffl~fll l~t~~f~ oZ llllplelllll~fPYl~l~~ ~ z---! ~~IIII!I9IE9IIII~II}~~! ~~~ ~W~ ~, ~~ ~~ ji ~~ II 11 _ '~fl~:~+~i~~;;\:~~C~j+~,l icy i~ _ ~~ .. /® • CJ • • RESOLUTION NO. 08-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR THE SECOND TIME EXTENSION OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16072, A SUBDIVISION OF 150.79 ACRES INTO 359 LOTS IN THE LOW (2-4 UNITS DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND VERY LOW (.1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, WITH AN AVERAGE DENSITY OF 2.3 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT, IN THE UPPER ETIWANDA NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ATTHE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WILSON AVENUE AND EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-083-01, 12, 13, 15, 16, AND 20. A. Recitals. 1. Richland Communities, Inc. filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 16, 2004, the City Council adopted its Resolution No. 04-204, thereby, approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 subject to specific conditions and time limits. • 3. On June 13, 2007, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 07-26, thereby, approving the application fora 1-year time extension subject to specific conditions and time limits. 4. On May 28, 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application for a second time extension and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 28, 2008 ,including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and • b. The extension of the Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 approval will not cause significant inconsistencies with the current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and A-6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-25 SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND COMMUNITIES, INC. May 28, 2008 Page 2 • c. The extension of the Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 approval is not likely to cause public health and safety problems; and The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on June 16, 2004, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. • b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the time extension request, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previouslycertified EIR. The proposed time extension request does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the tract map. Staff furtherfinds thatthe project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The proposed time extension request does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report for the tract map. c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the time extension. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tentative Map Applicant Expiration SUBTT16072 Richland Communities, Inc. June 16, 2009 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution Nos. 04-204 • and 07-26 and the Standard Conditions, attached thereto and incorporated herein bythis reference, to read as follows: A-7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-25 SUBTT16072 - RICHLAND COMMUNITIES, INC. May 28, 2008 • Page 3 Planning Department i) The applicant shall agree to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees, maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate, at its own expense, in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: • Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of May, 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • A-8 T H E C I T Y O F ' R A N C FI O C U C A M O N G A Staff Report DATE: May 28, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission - FROM: James R. Troyer, Planning Director BY: Adam Collier, Planning Technician SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00064 - MERITAGE HOMES, LLC. -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 55 single family lots on 14.5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, east of the Southern California Edison Corridor APN: 0225-071-47. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 and Development Review DRC2005-00986. Staff has found the project to • be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001)•and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact, Report. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 2.1 dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant Land -North Etiwanda Preserve South - Single-Family Residential East - Etiwanda Avenue West - Southern California Edison Corridor - C. General Plan Designations: Project Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North - North Etiwanda Preserve South - Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Etiwanda Avenue West - Utility Corridor\Flood Control D. Site Characteristics: The project is situated at the base of the alluvial fan which is located at the base of the San Gabriel Mountain foothills. This site was originally a portion of the Rancho Etiwanda Planned Development (previously the University Planned Development). Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM15699, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16226, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 were subsequently approved. Rough grading was completed in September 2005. ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00064 - MERITAGE May 28, 2008 Page 2 • ANALYSIS: Background: On February 22, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Development Review DRC2005-00986 for the development of 145 homes on a 52.54-acre site within the 632-unit Master Planned Community of the Rancho Etiwanda Estates. Because of a shifting demand in the housing market, the applicant, Meritage Homes, is requesting modifications of their previously approved building elevations, site plan, and plan sizes for 55 of their 145 home sites. The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP), incorporating the architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. Requirements include side-on garages, recessed garages, exterior siding, and specific architectural styles. A Development Agreement was approved in 2001 which required the Low Residential standards for all lots within this tract. The property was rough graded in June of 2004. The area was mass graded and infrastructure was installed. The master developer has installed the main access of the gated community, as well as the slope landscaping and decorative perimeter walls. These walls will be consistent throughout the entire master planned community. The site is bordered by vacant land to the north and west; by Day Creek Boulevard to the south; and a portion of Tract 16227, being built by K. Hovnanian, to the east. Design Parameters: The project site is located within the "Upper Etiwanda" neighborhood which has its own unique architectural design guidelines per the ENSP. The ENSP requires that a mix of the following primary architectural styles be used for at least two-thirds of the units: Bungalow, Ranch, Monterey, or San Juan. Up to one-third of the units may use these styles: Country, Victorian, or Santa Barbara • Revival. The proposed modifications are consistent with the required architecture and include downsized floor plans and larger yard areas to meet the demand of the current housing market. The new plans are a combination of one- and two-story homes and range in size from 2,194 square feet to 2,704 square feet of livable area. A total of 13 (23 percent) of the proposed house product will be single-story with four architectural styles. The two-story plans have been designed with two floor plans and four architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles are San Juan, Santa Barbara Revival, Monterey, and Ranch. The San Juan elevation incorporates wrought iron details, recessed windows, decorative shutters, and arched patio/entryways. The Santa Barbara Revival incorporates built-up eaves, louvered shutters, and recessed windows. The Monterey style incorporates oversized rafter tails, brick veneer elements, hardboard detailing, and recessed the features. The Ranch style incorporates board and batt siding, louvered shutters, wood kickers, and louvered hardboard details. All four sides of all the homes have articulation and incorporate decorative garage doors. Each of the four plans feature covered porch entries which range in size dependent upon the style. The developer is proposing to construct the 55 homes in nine phases. A. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Stewart, Nicholson) reviewed the elevations on May 6, 2008. The Committee recommended approval. B. Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in October 1999, and an Initial Study Addendum was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Staff has B-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00064 - MERITAGE May 28, 2008 • Page 3 found the project to be within the scope of the prior Environmental Impact Report and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, and Initial Study Addehdum. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2008-00064 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and Standard Conditions. Respectfully submitted, Jam s R. Troyer Planning Director JRT:AC\ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Site Utilization Map Exhibit B -Elevations Exhibit C -Floor Plans Exhibit D -Design Review Committee Action Comments dated May 6, 2008 • Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2008-00064 • B-3 • • .,~, I t _ a l i lira`-``fi ~_ '-_ Ila .~ ~xH-e-r ~ .~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ a ~ ? x,~ ~ ~~~uu~~~uu~~~uu~~~uu~~~uu~gggggggggg¢Q~Qg `~`~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~p~ff~,~i - ~0~bbb~NN 339338 ~m~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ,/ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ Fly ~~ ~ .NNaNrnrrpa9tlYllpCp dta~dt7~~ ~~~}- . ~'j I-.. - ~ i Jf: ` ~"- ~. /~ ~ III %`'~ I ~" .I, , _ . ;.v, li...~i v .~ ~r n~~':i - ~r -~~ i v )~ I lr „~`.rF~y i F--~~ /~. ~ ;,,, 'it)2,. yr_ / I ___-11'rQ 0i ~.i'~ '\Y F 6 r~l I1- ~~'I.. i ~ IL-: ~. - _ '• r ' -~~. ~~~~ ~~1~-~ Zak rgcv W W ~ ~-; i.!!. € Q^aQQ~~~ sissy: ao°OZ-~~CGv i g~~amW7•° i ~~~~ ~~~ W oQ~ _ ~~ zNo ~~~ U B ~1 runoff 9 ~W rZq~ ~¢ U a~ . i ~ 'J ~.- - ~ 1 ' _`d ~~a ., `~.~ ~'II tt ~~-•~ ~;;` C, ~~ ~ , ~ „j r,:_~ ~J -~:~'", ~w\ III ;U ; ~~- I ill;-$'r.•.',:--_ I7~ , w r ,.}1,_+a' s I l l i ~1'I~ r {~ `gF\\~~ I. T, 'J ~ \ ~_ ~\ J~~~ -~ / \ m , ,\r ~~ Po L-fir ~- !r ~~ ~. ,I!-~ 1 I `~/".-'l F-~ _~ i {--';;.-~1 r` _ =~_-_ -: B-4 XN10-r ~ II ~~i'~ 1~ ij~ll~ glli ."' 1!lf~ 1 ~ i' 9 ~'S~'J B-5 Q .~ 0 0 0 g N K • • ~~ii ;iji I ; p: _ i ~9 '!~i£' ~~':s B-6 P b O S 8 N U !Ij~i I'll le' lei I I I~i.~ ~6~i €la~ is eia L E',Si t. ~F 3G `a.C,g,~F ~~ie B-7 U O r LJ s;;i;: .~ j9 E ej ~ ;pl.,~ 's.ql{~~ ~ix • • B-8 <_ .~ - g~ 0 0 U 0 m J W N II I~~ sill j of pp y a'~:L 'LI PI ~~ i~ie ^I~lal~~ B-9 8b O O O N U O • • • = i~ g ~F,s ~,pp z ~{ ~'i'~~t~11f ~~~'. B -10 ~~ ~~ RI oei (~ O F >Q W 0 a g 0 S U O i ,iiii I' .~ IE.II ~;~ ~IEii e 9i u 21a'j v' B•11 -jl 0 0 0 0 U 0 m W N ~;i; • clji'ii it ~ iE'vi8~ i, e2 .Bill, Y. ~F~~ a xi[I~'_ • • B-12 / RI l ~I ~ ~ C _' e m J W 2 N 0 N U 0 I. bbl 19 C ~S aa 'i'',gE Jf~$. i, B -13 i 0 8 m 0 0 N U • • i sl ; i€~,i„', s. i ' o "~ ~o!~'Ei '~I~ ~e~s;ai i9'; ~E,: ~:, y~~ S Crc:E: B -14 e 0 0 0 g U ~I',~~,',I!~ a ICI^;i id, j :I,E~ iii ! ,a y;: ~.-~iIF'.~a~~ B-15 0 0 0 0 U O • • z~~~IiEI i~'- I9', ~. s . :, „ - eit'e!~ B -16 0 0 0 0 a N U 0 'lid- i I i , ~~ ~I ~~ i ~'i :I I•.: ~'G:e~I B -17 0 g g N U • ~~ ~l ~~ ~ o ~ ~ m~ ~~' m~ • - - - .__ --w -_-_-----: ~o, ~ ~ - _~ ; _ ~_ -a. lac e at "-- ~- - - - - - . ~ e • txN~~~r ~ B ~18 0 0 0 0 0 N U QN I ~ ~ k ~ ~°- [ c~ -- --^ 3 S __~ ~- _ u ., , _ _ o ..... ---b- -' B ~19 ~_ o~ 0 0 mm o~ N W U o N • :-- _ -~;-, p ,.- , . , p ~~ _ Y ---g~'~ I w Z~~ ...... ~ i ~..: ~-i h .. I I 1 1 ~~ ~ ,i .~ ~ ~~ wl sae 1 II III z0 ~ - O - I ~ ~ U _ - _ - ~ __ -+ _ _ ` 6 ~ 6 ' ~ T ~ ? F ~ _ ul •- _. 1 ~__ _ __ fir , . _ _.~ i,. _._t1J_ __._. 0___ ii Y ~_.--__ ~ ._ _ _ - -e -. 6: • • B ~20 ~_ o~ 0 mm o~ o Y.1 K oh • CONSENT CALENDAR DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Adam Collier May 6, 2008 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00064 - MERITAGE HOMES, LLC. -The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for 55 single-family lots on 14.5 acres of land in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located on the north side of Day Creek Boulevard, east of the Southern California Edison Corridor - APN: 0225-071-47. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16227 and Development Review DRC2005-00986. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse #88082915 and #98121091 certified by the City Council on August 1, 2001) and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report. Background: On February 22, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Development Review DRC2005-00986 for the development of 145 homes on a 52.54-acre site within the 632-unit Master Planned Community of Rancho Etiwanda Estates. Because of a shifting demand in the housing market, the applicant, Meritage Homes, is requesting modifications of their previously approved building elevations, site plan, and plan sizes for 55 of their 145 home sites. The applicant is required to develop within substantial compliance with the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP), incorporating the • architecture and design details of the Etiwanda area. Requirements include side-on garages, recessed garages, exterior siding, and specific architectural styles. A Development Agreement was approved in 2001 which required the Low Residential standards for all lots within this tract. The property was rough graded in June of 2004. The area was mass graded and infrastructure was installed. The master developer has installed the main access of the gated community, as well as the slope landscaping and decorative perimeter walls. These walls will be consistent throughout the entire master planned community. The site is bordered by vacant land to the north and west; by Day Creek Boulevard to the south; and by a portion of Tract 16227, being built by K. Hovnanian, to the east. Design Parameters: The project site is located within the "Upper Etiwanda" neighborhood which has its own unique architectural design guidelines per the ENSP. The ENSP requires that a mix of the following primary architectural styles be used for at least two-thirds of the units: Bungalow, Ranch, Monterey, or San Juan. Up to one-third of the units may use these styles: Country, Victorian, or Santa Barbara Revival. The proposed modifications are consistent with the required architectural styles and include downsized floor plans and larger yard areas to meet the demand of the current housing market. The new plans are a combination of one- and two-story homes and range in size from 2,194 square feet to 2,704 square feet of livable area. A total of 13 (23 percent) of the proposed house product will be single-story. The two-story plans have been designed with two floor plans and four architectural styles. The proposed architectural styles are San Juan, Santa Barbara Revival, Monterey, and Ranch. The San Juan elevation incorporates wrought iron details, recessed windows, decorative shutters, and arched patio/entryway. The Santa Barbara Revival incorporates built-up eaves, louvered shutters, and recessed • windows. The Monterey style incorporates oversized rafter tails, brick veneer elements, hardboard detailing, and recessed file features. The Ranch style incorporates board and batt siding, louvered shutters, wood kickers, and louvered hardboard details. ~XNiB~r D B ~21 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00064 - MERITAGE HOMES, LLC May 6, 2008 Page 2 All four sides of all homes have articulation and incorporate decorative garage doors and optional chimneys to match the architectural style of the home. Each of the four plans feature covered porch entries which range in size dependent upon the style. The developer is proposing to construct the 55 homes in nine phases. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The applicant has worked diligently with staff. Together with the Development Agreement and discussions with staff, there are no major issues. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: The applicant has worked diligently with staff. Together with the Development Agreement and discussions with staff, there are no secondary issues. • Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: • 1. Boulders from the project site shall be utilized and integrated as part of the front yard Landscape Plan, per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval. 2. Driveways shall be colored and scored in a diagonal pattern for additional entryway detail. 3. Submit a detail of the the work accents proposed on the San Juan style Plan Three prior to submitting construction drawings. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project subject to the above revisions. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Fletcher, Stewart, Nicholson Staff Planner: Adam Collier The Committee reviewed the project and recommend approval with no additional conditions. • B ~22 • RESOLUTION NO. OS-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00064, A PROPOSAL OF 55 DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON 14.5 ACRES IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, EAST OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CORRIDOR; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-071-47. A. Recitals. 1. Meritage Homes filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2008-00064, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of May 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 28, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located north of Day Creek Boulevard and west of Etiwanda Avenue, with a street frontage of approximately 1,600 feet on Day Creek Boulevard and a lot depth of 1,050 feet along Etiwanda Avenue, and is presently improved with rough grading and under construction for curb, gutter and utilities; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant land; the property to the south consists ofsingle-family residential; the property to the east is under construction; and the property to the west is a 240-foot wide Southern California Edison (SCE) utility corridor; and c. The project consists of a Development Review of 55 lots master planned by BCA Development; and , • d. The sewer, storm drain, detention basin, curb, and gutter are installed; and e. The project conforms to the basic Development Standards of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan with required architectural elevations, slope requirements, and overall project density. B -23 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 08-26 DRC2008=00064 - MERITAGE HOMES May 28, 2008 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. • 4. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991, a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in October 1999, and an Initial Study Addendum was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in August 2001, and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Environmental Impact Report, Supplemental Environmental • Impact Report, and Initial Study Addendum. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) All driveways shall have a maximum grade of 10 percent. If necessary, driveways shall be lengthened and the garage setbacks increased in order to achieve a 10 percent grade. 2) Wall heights are limited to a maximum of 6 feet. Separate retaining walls are limited to 4 feet in height. 3) Boulders from the project site shall be utilized and integrated as part of the front yard Landscape Plan, per the Master Plan Resolution of Approval. 4) Driveways shall be colored and scored in a diagonal pattern for additional entryway detail. Engineering Department 1) Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract SUBTT16227 shall apply. • 2) Pay the Traffic Circulation Improvement Fee of $2,635 per residence, prior to building permit issuance. B-24 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 08-26 DRC2008-00064 - MERITAGE HOMES • May 28, 2008 Page 3 3) If any drive approaches will be relocated, such as that of Lot 96, process a revision to Drawing 2020 through the Engineering Department. Lot 96 drive approach is shown displaced 7 feet from its location on the City's improvement plans. Environmental Mitigation Measures 1) The project shall implement all pertinent mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report that was prepared and certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in June 1991, the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report that was certified by the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors in October 1999, and the Initial Study Addendum that was certified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in August 2001. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA u BY: Pam Stewart, Chairman ATTEST: James R. Troyer, Planning Director I, James R. Troyer, Planning Director of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of May 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS NOES: COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS • B-25 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00064 SUBJECT: DESIGN REIVEW OF 55 LOTS APPLICANT: MERITAGE HOMES. INC. LOCATION: NORTH OF DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, offcers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, offcers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 08-26, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits Development/Design Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. C Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, and the Master Plan. • SC-1-05 Comolehon Date -/-- -/- -/- - -/- B ~26 Project No. DRC2008-00064 Completion Date 2. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and _/_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety • Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 3. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be -/-I- submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all _/_/_ other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 7. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, _/_/_ including proper illumination. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved 9 prior to the issuance of building permits. ment of all lan and schedule for the develo n tructi n access l h ll b it Th d / / . p p eve oper s a su m a co s o e _ _ lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 10. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _/_/_ condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property ' owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 11. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than _/_/_ wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 12. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/_/_ gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 13. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. _/_/_ 14. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to _/_/_ maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 15. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The _/_/_ 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a • cash deposit on any property. B-27 Pro)ect No DRC2008-00064 Comoletion Dale Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. Multiple car garage driveways shall be tapered down to a standard two-car width at street. E. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. • 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and Etiwanda North Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. F. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 538 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. G. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the • overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. - -~- -~-~- -~-- -~-- -~-~- -~=~- -~-- -~-~- -~- - -~- B •28 Project No DRC2008-00064 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) H. General Requirements 1. Submit flue complete sets of plans including the following: _/_/_ a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2008-00064) clearly identifed on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/ the City prior to permit issuance. ~ 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. _/_/_ 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. I. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2008-00064). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2 Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant _/_/_ shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. • B ~29 Project No DRC2008-00064 J. New Structures • 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. K. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertorm such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. ~PPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Street Improvements Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Security Hardware 1 A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. • 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. Completion Date /_/. I_ . /-( /-, /_/ /_/ / / /_/ -~-~- -~-~- --~- B30 Protect No DRC2008-00064 Completion Date N. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted _/_/ from frame or track in any manner. O. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime _/_/_ visibility. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • s B ~31 ----,. ., __~~ May 15, 2008 Meritage Homes Tract 16227-1 55 Home Sites DRC2008-00064 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply. Fire Hydrants shall be installed in accordance to RCFPD Standard 9-8 and CVWD regulations. FSC-2 Fire Flow • 1. The required fire flow for this project will be calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with the 2007 CA Fire Code Appendix B, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinance FD46. Fire service plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. 2. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the public water supply. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems are required 1. Automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in all homes garages including attic spaces in accordance to the approved Alternative method application # 07442, PMT2008-00908. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access 1. Fire District access roadways include public roads; streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access -Fire Lanes Standard 9-7. • 2. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design requirements apply: B-32 a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre- emption device. The devices shall be digital. Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and specifications. • b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate. d. A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20-minutes and shall automatically reset. 3. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 4. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC-7 Hazardous Fire Area 1. This project is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-High Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous • Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. Hazard Reduction Plans: The applicant shall prepare the architectural plans for the construction of the buildings in accordance with the County of San Bernardino's Development Code as amended by RCFPD Ordinance FD49. The CA Building Code Chapter 7A requirements apply to the construction of the buildings based on the slope of the terrain and/or mitigation of the fuel modification plans. The development code provides standards regulating and requiring: a. Fire resistive roof assemblies b. Fuel Modification and hazard reduction plans c. Fire District access roadways d. Fire resistive construction and protection of openings. e. Fire sprinkler systems f. Fire flow criteria 3. Comply with the following guidelines of the ,approved Final Fuel Modification plan and applicable approved alternative methods. • 2 833 Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Fuel Modification Plans: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. • PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER 1. The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 3. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 4. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 or #9-2 by Fire Construction Services. • 5. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. B34 The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and • the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. Fuel Modification: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of Fire Hazardous Area requirements. • • B35 07442 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District • And Fire Construction Services APPLICATION FOR ALTERNATE METHOD Uate (~trt~l 3-f, av-J8 MasterCase# 2oo9-cooW Project Address 134y 0/trland dr~vc Petson Requesting Changt Ka+h-t F*cci+.n PMT# .. ~~ Ph R4 9 ~ ~So"4 4 ~o VWe request the following change in bttilding/development requirements or inspection pra:edures. (Anach plans, drawing, spec sheers, narrative, etc-, as necessary to support proporal): 4/1/2008 4/1!2008 PMT2008-00908 REQUESTED CHANGE: wewrrua~lE oscwatoa crsERUMa3t _ see c+}c~~,y~~.~~ ALTERNATE METHOD FOR 55 LOTS TO MITGATE 2007 CBC CHP 7A ,REQUIREMENTS aaaR cr REASON FOR CHANGE: , ~~~~ TRACT 16227 -1 ~,i(d4~n>•.-~ Supporcing D[x:uments Signature Date 3 ~ 31 ~ o $ Attached" Office Use Below This Line Applicable Codes/Procedures APPROVED By Tide NA~L Date l~~ f~,e?~ ^ DISAPPROVE Atr~---- aide Date III" ~~//~~~ NOTE: This decision is specific o tis requested change only and is based vilely on the facts included herein. r CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: ~.La~~"' c~ ?moo ~l ffB~ci~`~' .d-vbrwfi<tYJ - - 7. _ .. ~ iii.~~- ice.. tai. i R D ~1~:«aN~` ~ ~ !/~ 7~r~e ~..~s'~ ~arr,a~.~ /h`~o A4~Trf Entered in RMS ^ Permit [slued ^ Permit # Fee Paid ^ Daze Amount Onginul io FCS Copies ~o: RCFU ~ aRp~icam ,F3n.2 (REV. MI61 g ~~~~l~~l~'!1-~ ~ B-36 Mazch 31, 2008 Mr. John Thomas City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: DRC2008-00064 - 55 Home Design Submittal -Tract 16227-1 Deaz John: Mer`itage Homes ~ As discussed in our meeting on March 27, 2008, Meritage Homes is proposing that in lieu of having to provide 360 degree fire-resistive building materials on all of the proposed 55 lots to meet the new fire regulations the City will be adopting, our homes would be designed with the following: 1. Automatic residential fire sprinkler system (including attic & gazage azeas) 2. Windows that comply with Chapter 7A of the 2007 C.B.C. 3. L.ow-profile attic vents that integrate 1/8 "wire mesh screen • 4. Eave construction that incorporates solid blocking that separates the eave from the roof construction Woodley Architectural Group has provided the attached letter and cut sheets, which outline in more detail what we are proposing. After your review of our proposal, please verify in writing that the City of Rancho Cucamonga would accept these mitigation measures so that we may incorporate these details on the construction drawings. Thank you. Sincerely, Kathy M. Freeman Project Manager cc: Moises Eskenazi Robert Ball ~M"'~-a~,J'.~p~(Q~rPT~/,f-~ ,~{10{~-'0 X048 ~~~ RRNCHO CUCA ONGA ~ "~~ FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 'these pl:ms have been reviewed far compliYKe !~-~Tp .'~cuhle codes mid ~IanJ,n J. as adopted ~'. ..•: ea~n _.~ hire D,.a •:~ `P ^PP!u~rJ ^ Disapproved, resubNejt with eortnctigrip .. ~~ review does not relieve the tlZ'VgJQper, archrteCL.~. ~. . u•r. c ummc Inr, nr imial Icr of the Td(fb,~isi6itily 10 rtle[t ; .. .-nln.~d: f~dcul Smtc. Cbphty. City, Fire t.. „ . .. Ur L~ .,ace; of Regutati:!nr, ~ „ _ _ ~ LI unncetiom .n Irx . __.._ Uale .. __.._ B-37 5161 California, Suite 2~ Irvine, G 92617 p. 949.250.6600 J 949.250.6656 _ - F . . I u - - ' J - .. • TE ,= Mprch Q5 20C T© -- =The ~Ity :af Ra -- _ _ - Sr~ilding' and _ _ - t b~OO ~IVic_C _ _~- ~ _ - Ran~,ho Cucc . : ~ FROM ~vlik~ WoQdle _ '~ - - Tie Woodle l!`L - _ _ RE - Metitage~Ha~r - ~Rancha~#twcii ~~ - .' The~purpcse ofthls )et;terss"t .- - ~: - .~,;' :_ pr~duc~t for~5 homes~r~-fibe ~,. _ rTle(75t~reS Wlli 3afiISfi~Lt!'ie-~i~~j coristrucflerLte.cE~ilgr~es~tte: Godes (1Nf)IBC) and Cri~~# " Ourintention Is tQ design asl ~~~ CBC focusing prmarlly ~or~~`th I - ~ , dAsfiructlon of property-from' _ ;; the _exteriorsurface ~rd-sf~ii • A automatlE res; B wlndov,+s_thbt~ _ - C eave cortstr~,c the ea~e,tfrorn ~ r? = low-prd~fle ~f~i requlr~d~y nom: . ;_: - - .. We are: proposing to rncfude ci#tlc-aecl garage) for ff~e pr ~~.~ de~eicp~„ent. A sannkler su w. r~a~erial. -= - - ' `~ ~ 1L:. The:exterior window:packac '~ msutating glass unifs with a n , fn y r= i,; - - _ . pane};as specifed by the rv th i reg " i t e f Ch c ; e= u rer _ r n s o an e __ Urbdn=lnterface Building Sfci ~.: - . .. .. Qurcontertlon with respect. to plate In=dn ca e s t p . y s , our ~ accordance :with the curre'ri from wind blov~n fire ember l t e v -' Last y, ' he ave, ents thgfi ai • _eave vent, or eq,hivalertwafi'~~ -. „ _,:, .. ... . . 4 .1~A v4;.:~ lov ~cl- StC s ~,,.. ~m _ ~ of the~;C-$;C e - - -~ . of the standard'/." mesh) installed under the slotted vent openings. Soffit and • eave vents are not to be used with the new product as not to create areas for burning embers to enter the attic space. The attic vents shall be instaled in a "high and low" pattern and orientated away from any delineated "fire corridors" from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We believe that with the addition of the construction techniques listed above the new homes shall be protected agajpst possible fire conditions. Michael L. Woodley, AIA The Woodley Architectural Group • u See attachment "Exhibit A" B-39 • • OONCI~IE TILe W! (U LATER 30' WDERLATMENi (A51M D•116) • NOTE: NO EAV-_' VENTS ALLOWED REFER TD 5r"~CS. FOR STILE AND WSTAJIATION ~Gt11REMENTS ROOF SFEATHIPG ~: TO 51RIC1URAL P~•EFGNEERED 1RJ55 ADJLST ROOF TRSS HEEL FGT. TO PLANE PLTWD.W/1X STARTtR BfcD. 1X SOLID BLKG, REFER TO STRICT. 1X6 EXPOSED DECORATIVE RARER -- . TAILS e 74' OL: BACK PRIME PRIOR TO WSTALL(LAP AND SPIKE TD TR155E5 OR a RAFTERS PER STRICT.DWG'S) t~1AL BIwSTOP , `-WSULATION PER 1-14 I i(!' -~ ' 1X6 RS F I < ~ , . WD. R EZE BRD. ri WT. g' TYPE 'X' GIP. BDARD ' IX STARTER BOARD AT EXP D. SGFFITS 3 BOAR) EAVE ` REFER 10 R7JF PLANS 16 GA G•90 GALV. , ~1C/ METAL DRIP EDGE (11 CATERS 60 MW. GRADE 'D' BUILDING i N * FLASHIN's MINIMd1 - 'k PAPER OYeR EXTERIOR SHEATHIhY, MW. 9 TFK EXTERIOR 511YC0 NOTE: UNDER_AYMENT SHALL EXTEND A SYSTEM, Rc~ER TO MAMFACTURER'S i MIN. Cf n' UP VERY. WD/ BLK'G OR SPECIFICATIONS '• WALL. NOTE: MIN. ~' THK GNIIIGN RESISTANT EXT CEMEM . NOTE: REFER TO 51RJCIURAL DRaUINGS FOR BRD. 0/ 60 MUL GRADE 'D' B! DG. PAPER 54~AR REOUIREMENiS CN EX1. TYPE 'X' GIP. BTU. MAT OCCUR W CERTAW AREAS UNLE55 AllTOMATIC FIRE NOTE; PROVIDE NA(LMG, BATie?IS AND W9Fb SPRINKLERS ARE USED WITHIN TFL FIOPE ~R CLIPS PER fFR WSTALLATION SECTION 9D3313 (f•FPA I3D) RcCOM"ENDATIONS ~R ~AY~ WI 2X RAVER TAILS lS1U000J WAGIMODI1R01 'S' CONCRETE 11LE ALL M47ERI4'_S SHALL 9E MSTALLED WAG-5•iILE•FR11 PER MlWIFAC7URER55PECIFIGAi1~ I•IR' : I'-m' ^ APr ROY2D ^ APPROVED A5 NOTED ^ REVISE AND ~SUBMIi ^ REJECTEDl~2ESU&11T ^ N01 REVIEIIED ^ FOR YOI1R IFFOR`1ATILN snmras 4fE tEVa~®fcRCaraa+4~ mTU ~..aol ortaT am raaui taP WYE 01ii1 iFE fa.TRtLT BW18115 Gl' i. NT4iYN5 W N7f 4UIIGf~ WCIC~6 i0 74f [QllRlif 9lt aPPW+ fllt91f5 A`DX.R fA3~CIKM 0~3 MOf RELlYE IlE fiNfRL-FOR fR71 41CF IIfI171E GQdR4Ci B0.]lENfS. 71E CENiRKIGR IS ~E FOR ra+'aa+M; xe ra~urec au auNmffs,orearxs, 70.fWlYE5.0.EAFNCES,fABfGAPCN Fld'A~5'ES 7EGfd0E5 pm!FLFA'25 6 GC167pL11C1T fQPA7LN1tt LF ttai@E4l54`D fEM11'1Y, fA'F~NA7KN GF 71EIR ILX illN OfiER iPAGES N09BCR.TRG'TORS, F4bLR1NYP LF ¢qY, BI A 6NE dNJ SdiIS~aCI0R1'tVkER W fLR RLLL GLTP IR1F W7N lff CR7RACf 0.b1fld15. 041E: 4°Pf~ED BT: oar: caww us=.BauRr7eel oR4av Br: wxs DET4h 145tORT LW BT p4R woooLET ARCHITECTURAL / , GROUP, WC. p ~Il)SOW, ~lYeTG LG 1A ! JN~iflimaW'~IOIA tl 10Y1M3R+q b¢ 3Ml IJmn SVN,j,pA JI S~OAN.U 9l N+ 9NSpK1~- Nfssvsof p.q ' O ~wv~a+v~we.mra.r.c ns..~v ~rsr,r v>ssaw~n.r.s B-40 CONCRETE TILE W/ (U LA1 <R 30' IAIDERl.A7PEM (ASTM D-776) REAR TO SPECS. FOR STILE AND OJS i d:LLATION f~LMlli¢T1ENT5 RCCf $NEATHML• fK: TO STRUCNRA! FRE•ENGPJ=FRED iid155 ADJUST RCOF TRU55 HEEL FGi. TO PLANE PLTU,D. W! 1X STARTER BRD. lk 50LID 8LK'G, REFER TO STRJCi. 7X6 EXP05ED DECORATIVE RAFTER TAILS c 74' OL: BACK PRIME PRIOR TO WSTALLTLAP MID SPIKE TO Tp155E5 OR RAr-TERS PER STRJCT. DIW'S) PETAL BIRDSTOP W/ UEEP NO!c5 ~~ nl:.n .v w'.n i ~sYw (1) LAT'ER5 60 MIN. GRADE'D' ESIIILDIFYs PAPER OVER EXTERIOR 5NEA1HItN', MTN gi' T1aY. EXTERIOR 51000A 5T51EM, REFER TO MANUFALNRER'S SPELPICAiICNS NOTE: MIN ~' iNK IGNITION RESISTANT EXT. LEf&M 3RD. 0/ 60 MM. GRADE 'D' ESLDG PAPER _ ON 'cXT. TTPc 'X' G7P. BRD. MAT OCQ1R IN CERTAM AREAS lWLE55 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINQERS ARE US=D WTNW TFE NOPfE PER SECTION °.0331T (NFPA 13D/ %' TTPE 'X' GYP. BOARD a STARTER BOARD AT EXP'D. SOFFITS 26 GA G-90 GALV. , PETAL DRIP EDGE n ~~"/ ~LASNPKi MMI'Al1 1 NO1E: UNDERLA7MEM SHALL EXTEIm A MIN CF T!' UP YERi. WD/ BLK'G OR WALL. NOTE: REFER TO STRI7LTURAL DRAWIN's5 FOR - SHEAR REQUIREMENTS NOTE: PROVIDE NAT! QJG, BATTENS AND Wibp CLIPS PER T'FR PJSTAL! ATION Ti~LOMt'Ei NDATI0N5 1=R SAYE W/ 2X RACER tQILS lS1U0001 'S' CONCRETE TILE ALL MATE WAG-S-TILE•FRI PER nwu WWiIM 3E INSTALLED 'ECPICATIONS. -R' I'-O' ^ APR20vcD ^ APPRD~D AS NOTED ^ REVISE AND REJJBMIT ^ REJECTEDA~5U92'IIT ^ NOT REVIEWED ^ FOR POUR IIFOTd1ATI0N 9@Y1iiN5 Aff /Lal'EIED FCR CCNORtAIYE IIIVI DESYJI IfIB7 AD G@FR/J. fLl'fLIWF O7N TIE fLNfRAO G'A71'EYIS DIQT. NOfA7CN5OU IiOi dRVGiS& 6WC£5 i0 TIE IX)llPl+'f 9Jt N~/I:. LQTB7I5 MDKR CGW~L14'16 DOES N01 fELEK IfE:RIIRA^IGR FF1]f fLTR WY'F lIRI ilE CWIRd'T DO07'IXIS. ltiE CCSTRdLiDR l5 lfSVb'ClE KR COFCRIIG YID fQd6Lf5Y. aLL OYMIIES, Ol66KAt1, fO.IIUJ'YF5.4EAQ4CES. FA7R:dIiWF~F~F' S. iFDNIOES pm£~E5 OF CQ157RGTICIL CfTPAiOLiT CFMAlEFEOIb fA9IE11L'OS, LGCWNdiGN LF IIERICRC VAIN OIIfR IRODES a`D 98la:TRKTR6, Ff~'t¢YE CA Itld: M a Sao 4`D SdiL4aLfORT MINER uU ILRItOA GG>•FlIYYf lAhl iLE C11MRAf.I D:x11FhT5. DdiE 4"PRhfD Bi: DdF LWdmi KkERLRI'7001 DRYN Br: <fEfil DEidtl. RSTORi LCG ET DqE WOOOLEY / • •' ARCHITECTURAL GROUP, INC • • Hn Saei uyer,ean>~ ~n :q+.:m~ mmin foA d6VVa leq • MINHn Ynat Lleh Sne wti U 92105 H9551HI~ M95521NY~ ~ ~ (yro5~'m~9.~I4eN.rt 1~r.5p:Hr>:s asp>.e Mel HH.~I ~~n~Yb: a GsYlwarwtl M1Y. K B -41 NOTE: NO EA1r vEMS ALLCUED ~: ~ ; T H E C I T Y O F R A N C h O C ll C A M O N G A Staff. Report DATE: May 28, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R. Troyer, Planning Director BY: Corkran W. Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director SUBJECTS: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17433 -DAT TA - A request to subdivide 2.39 gross acres of land into 9 lots in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 9814 Church Street, which is on the north side of Church Street, 140 feet west of Pasito Avenue -APN: 1077-311-74. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, which covers in-fill development within certain criteria. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Related files: DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2005-00490 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00491. • DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW - DRC2005-00490 -DAT TA - A proposal to develop nine single-family homes on 2.39 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) located at 9814 Church Street, which is on the north side of Church Street, 140 feet west of Pasito Avenue -APN: 1077-311-74. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, which covers in-fill development within certain criteria. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17433 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00491. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 3.76 dwelling units per acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North -Single-family tracULow Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) South- Single-family residence and multiple-family units/Medium Residential (8-14,dwelling units per acre) East -Single-family tracULow Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Three single-family residences and vacant land/Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) North -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) • South -Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) East -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) West -Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) ITEM C&D PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT17433 AND DRC2005-00490 - DAT TA May 28, 2008 Page 2 • D. Site Characteristics: The subject site is located on the north side of Church Street and approximately 140 feet west of Pasito Avenue. The 103,930 square foot rectangular shaped vacant lot drains from northwest to southeast with an approximate grade change of 20 feet from the northwest to the southeast property lines. The site is surrounded by residential dwelling units with abutting tracts of single-story residences to the immediate north and east of the site. The three neighboring residences to the west are in a more rural setting with lot areas of approximately an acre or more. Across the street to the south are two-story multiple-family units and aone-story, single-family residence. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed development consists of a 9-lot infill subdivision, with a house product for each lot. Lot sizes for the proposed subdivision range from approximately 7,300 square feet to 14,000 square feet, which exceeds the current minimum net area requirement of 7,200 square feet. The house product consists of four floor plans: Model 1, a two-story floor plan at 3,336 square feet (excluding the garage area at 759 square feet); Model 2, a two-story floor plan at 3,263 square feet (excluding the garage area at 574 square feet); Model 3, a single-story floor plan at 2,649 square feet (excluding the garage area at 468 square feet); and Model 4, a two-story floor plan at 3,094 square feet (excluding the garage area at 708 square feet). All of the plans convey a contemporary Craftsman style and have substantial variations in the roof designs by combining gable, hip, and shed roof elements to further enhance the elevations. Also, the finished exteriors will provide color variations of stucco, vertical wood siding, ledge stone veneer, and decorative • garage doors, as shown on the submitted Streetscape View plan sheet. This project, as submitted, meets the applicable height limits, setbacks, lot coverage and area requirements, as set forth in the Development Code. A single-sided stub street that terminates into a partial knuckle is proposed to service the 9-lot subdivision. The Engineering Department has reviewed this proposal and is requesting, as a condition of approval, that the developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire additional right-of-way area from the adjacent property owners to the west of the site for the purpose of providing a standard knuckle and street width. However, if the developer is unsuccessful in acquiring the additional right-of-way area, the proposed 48-foot dedication, as shown on the submitted Site Plan, is acceptable. As part of the application submittal, the applicant is required to provide a conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit D) to illustrate how the proposed development could accommodate potential development of the more rural properties to the immediate west of the site. In staff's opinion, the plan provides for acceptable lot configurations, street widths, and access. B. Neighborhood Meetings: The applicant invited surrounding residents to neighborhood meetings on October 26, 2005, and March 20, 2006. A total of 17 individuals attended the two meetings; and while no specific objections to the project were noted, specific concerns were discussed as noted in the attached Neighborhood Meeting Summary Reports (Exhibit I). C. Design Review Committee: The Committee (Stewart, Munoz, and Diaz) reviewed the proposed • project on March 18, 2008, and approved the proposal as presented by the applicant, which incorporated staff's request to cover each chimney with compatible ledge stone veneer as a further exterior enhancement. C&D- 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT17433 AND DRC2005-00490 - DAT TA May 28, 2008 • Page 3 D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on March 18, 2008. The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached draft Resolutions of Approval. E. Grading Review Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the project on March 18, 2008. The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the project complying with all applicable grading and drainage requirements as set forth by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. . F. Tree Removal Permit: The applicant is proposing to clear the site of vegetation to accommodate the new development, which includes removing the majority of the on-site trees (i.e.,,approximately 23 trees would be removed under the requested permit, excluding the removal of approximately 20 citrus trees that are exempt from the preservation ordinance). A Consulting Arborist's Report (Exhibit J) has been provided by the applicant that describes such trees as having many problems because of the site not being properly maintained. However, approximately 11 of the healthier trees will be retained along the northerly and easterly property lines of the site. Also, if this project is approved, it will provide approximately 60 new 24-inch box trees of various specimen types throughout the proposed development, as shown on the submitted Conceptual Landscape Plan. G. Landscaping: The applicant's proposal does not provide for any ground cover within the rear yard areas. Therefore, staff is recommending that the tree removal permit be conditionally approved by the Planning Commission with the provision that all of the rear yard areas are planted with sod, as • a minimum ground cover material for dust control purposes because of the high wind area, and that the additional landscaping requirement be incorporated into the final Landscape Plan. H. Geotechnical Evaluation: Because the site is near the southern margin of a City Adopted Special Studies Zone associates with the Red Hill Fault, a geotechnical evaluation of the site was done by RSG Engineering Geology in 2006. In summary, the study determined that the southwestern portion of the zone near the site is not considered active, and no restrictive use zones or fault setback requirements are considered necessary for the proposed development. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, which covers in-fill developments which meet the following criteria: 1) the project is consistent with the General Plan as well as with applicable zoning regulations; 2) the subject site is no more than 5 acres; 3) the project has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; 4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effect on the environment (traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality); and 5) the site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Having determined that the project meets all of the above criteria, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. • C& D- 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT17433 AND DRC2005-00490 - DAT TA May 28, 2008 Page 4 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17433 and DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2005-00490 through the adoption of the attached draft Resolutions of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, f ~ ~ ~~~ James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:CN\ma Attachments: Exhibit A -Site Pian Exhibit B -Conceptual Grading Plan & Drainage Plan Exhibit C - Arial Photo Exhibit D -Master Plan Concept Exhibit E -Neighborhood Building Study Exhibit F -Floor Plans, Elevations, and Roof Plans Exhibit G -Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit H -Design Review Committee Action Comments dated March 18, 2008 Exhibit I -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Reports of October 26, 2005, and March 20, 2006 Exhibit J - Arborist Consultation Report dated March 16, 2005 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16262 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2001=00584 C~ • • C&D- 4 • 9hs§§~ ~`g~i49$9?~ W g q W C R W W N EE l6EB;x[Ee6# aa;venaec$ 7~9~.~:~:~-s~~~g~9 • ;~£M £'g~6 ~S~~i ~~ ~ _~ ~~ n~~ ~~ € 6 ~ g' ' ~ ~ € g p~ ~ ~ ~ i :: - Y E 6 =Q4F 3 ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ &~~~~~~ ~~ ~~$~ I~ 4elReae ~ SITE PLAW °D 8 ~ PFOJECT DATA Exy~ ; u'~~s 9 6 $ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ € g Q R ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~F ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ~ § ~ ~~ ~ k tr a y 0 x e t t -STREET ' '~ ~~~ 9C"~ gE a~ ~~~ zy~ 6~~s1 ~ ~ ~ ~ • 4 ~ im ~ ~ ~® W. ~ ~ f1A ggggg S~ F4 ~~~N P ~~f 5 ~~ ~ ; z 3 + + xn-. i' s ~~~~~ ' &~ g 6C y i' ~gg g~ ~ ~ ~ O= V ~~A ~ 888 b DA W O m ~~e~4~ ~ Q D-1 Y4 m rPPy ~~: o -- ---~. _ _1~7.- o - ~ ~~a E, T~ $ ~~ -_v ~,' F y .M ~k r SY ~~ ~ B ffie ~ ~E __ I I t ~-~ i L €g ~~ w.o ~ 3 >~ I°"~I''igp unQ i i I om ggia o mse €~5~;~~~@@AC $ e Omt ~ ~~~Fq yp a~n i. x i w ~ - _-~ ~i[f~~Ii~~~~° axe aa.a leWa@@a{~ o ~$8 eefC~u ' 39gR ~ i ee f 9 ~~ ~e°~ _J~• ~3 / / p 'CHURCH SiREEi F• _ _/° r.a.. _ ~ - - _ - - - -__ _ _ _ __ -______--~ ~•p~ Y~y r LiNCiF FAA9LY {EPDB~ICEB yyP +ei+uwcx e.. IGb~ +.urro ucnvwn cn nno 9e= Qd.' ..1....1....1.gp...1....1.. N ,y p Y_ i~ ~¢~~~g~~~Fd~~l~~~~~~f ~~~~~g~~~~~~~~g~~ ~ s !• ~, ~§ ~ ~~ €~~~~~~iT~f~~~~~~~l~~~l~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ V ~a .g~ ~5 ~ ~ i s i! ! $~; gde~ ~~6~FS; x3 F ~a~g~g ~~~ Q p g ,gy x g p¢¢¢ gr P~ P Y 1 M ~§ u ~7,..".,~,T,.,7,,,,~, ai' l~~Y~~~S~~=ti~~ ~~~!€gsy~}yta ! g"' : !~~ ~ P e 3 P ! ~`ea$ ~ R5 g ~ Ea a` ~ a~,&Y ~IjE~lt¢gge! n ,....1.'l~1....1. ~i}!} !~ ~~ ~~i ~~d1li}~~al~Xi~ CC ! 6 I5J ~ q }} R ~ a d ! ti> a @!- E z !~~ ! ~~ as e~ ~~ ~~ , ; ~~ g~g~ {a ~5 Mi ---~ ~ e7 F !~E r~g~a~~> IFSR[IppIIG e N"i~~€ rP~~~~~~~~~ie«C~ E~~~~s~e~i~~~E~lE !~ ~ ~ 0 0 A ~ >; m 9 ~s e R n ~~ I~ ~~ n n ',n u y 7 ~° O 2 ~ Y a ~ $ TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT 17433, ~ e a DRC 2005-00490 ~ '_ ~ "s 9814 CHURCH STREET, ~~~~' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 Z n nS~>~i~ ~y gA z fil ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,Se~ ~I ~ op yo o Q ~ D g~i~a ~~ ~e~~~g g c, i9ll ~~~~=~ o ~ ~~a ~ '~ nvi"~a ~ y ~ ~ ~ >m~~'e ~~g ~ i _ Z ~ g~ Qc~g ~ g p Z G7 ~ 2e~-'V~ ~~m $ y ~ 7 D ~ Sp ~pv t:~ g~~Pv ~ za ~4nNN 1 ~ .Z7 AK a;i p ~,1>'0~ g > Z e~°~~ ~~~~ti ~ y D ~ a Z ~ ("n i~;Ap ~ip~oo 0 0 ion: ^;>oo ' ~ ~Og w Z ~Z ~ ° i ~ NONM _ 9 x 6 n ~ ~ ~' v EGL ASSOCIATES, INC. ,;~. 11819 GOLOR9lC ROAD, UNIT A ~ ~ f ~ ARCAOIA, CA 91006 ~`P" Tel: (626) 263-3566 Fax (626) 263-3599 • u `r~ u • • 00 ®OOGi009@0060®B 0 0~~~~y~y~pipjp~pp~40C~01 ~Pa~ ,d F "cam' ~g~~gF6~93! 3~6~~~€ S~~ arro~x9oDSr Nest -~--, ''' _ Navsz'.i*t §3 " aea .~°I _ ~q~ $ ----_- ----------- - ---- _ .~ ~ fir; -~~~~~ ~r- -- _ ,.. siR 'A' . i a /_ _ ~ I 1 ___ 'il pp1__ ,.,e-' -_ --e-- __--_-_-""'""--i ~ i li ~--' G ~ ~~' " ' ~ ~iiiaR ~'~ ~ i I __ " ~'S -(~ '' I I ___ ---- M---- r - -- y, I -''I~~ I I II __ '"- {(''"~~_ ~--- -__" ~E ~ JI ~ I s. a ~ L7c~ElE`_-L~- J I I ~ I I -'-'-' ':vim' _" ,`__--'~ ~ J Iry ~ ~ " ' ` L - _~-~- ~ i ~ Ile1,~ a b~ 5i•@~la6~„ I I II __--- ~ ,~I~ sx--~9 ~ -----I I it - ,~,, G, a ga i'`- I I I ---..~ - I L ~-" I I I I '' ~ w G's' I I ( _ o v~ __- _ ,«'____ a. 'i°b_E'Ci~B~ .4 ~I! 3' CC~a7 --y'~ I I I I ____- ~ II ~ ~i ;E 7 ~ s .a ~~ I I II a ~ Ig Z~ ! I0 ~ s b?s ~ ~ I I I I z . I 7- -~~ ... 1 i-a'- a 11 'i 8 S ~ Iv791 a -«w sj" I -~----~;-~~'-------~= oar o r _~----. - _-"""- I I -_--9c-, qr-"'_ -I _--~ ~I,wwl~ ~ L - J ~ ~ i "~ ~ TENTATIVE TRACT SUBTT 17433, e ~ ~ v DRC 2005-00490 „ b >i ~ 9814 CHURCH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 k~'P~~~h~~~ `g~2~16R i e[ _.. _ 7 _ ~~illl~ a \~ § 1 / ~i~6~~~e~~ ; 1 EGL ASSOCIATES, INC. g 11879 GOLDRING ROAD, UNIT A PISA ARGAOIA, CA 91006 Te1~~62fi) 263-3588 Fax: (626) 263-3599 n z rn C D r D D Z ~I~ m z S7o -D_i ~ Z D Zm 0 . 'v .A J D w Z ~ '~'" a g ~xu~a~rc ~ & o_ 8 Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17433 -,~ ~q6 ~~ W~ ~-s~ xus w'vwwv«n wow c ~avwo rm~ S30N3063N A'1{Ntld 3?]IJI6 s 00 io •_~ off. Ntlld tl318tlW SP : H ~ i i z m rc o ~ V- i V N _ ~ W ro [C W d N f~/1 y0 W W O> ~ ~ 5 ao LL t ~ ~ r-, I I ~ I I L_J .. i w c~ 0 z 0 ,__-r--T-I-r-1--1------~ i l -,,\ ----- ~ lYJ 3AV tlNOWtlM ___ \ ~_- -~- W _-_ ~ ~ ~ ~ FY's ~ i 3 ~ .r ~ ~6 ~ .~ ~ ~° -~ =w -~ I ------- ' I ' ~ ~, ..r_-_-_-_-_~, ~o N (n A W ~ ~ 6 -~-------3Atl O11SVd - ~_ ~ ~ 3Ab O11Sb u d 30N OIS3 (l' O1S X3 ~ r.:~,: ~~ ~~ 1 ~a ~ ~ ~~ ~,k ~d' ~e~,.,.~~' ~' ~r mix x, `: ~ i ~~ I I I _ _ _ ~,, ' :'',, I I I I :: - I- ~--I-- -- ~. -I q~l I o~ I~': Ise I f ~ '~ 1_--L L_. _I--_ - _. I .-_____ --_ W ._r-T` - - - - _ ''~1~' I'~ Ea i _y_~ _ 1' - : 7 ~ -_ i I -~----- • ~XKr~lr ~ U----------anvo~veli+~av--- C&D- 9 I .. W I ~ i i 'N 1~ _I° __, i i i i i /// : t1 ~ .r.: . x Y +~ ~~. ~ ~~n ~. }}~Y ~~~ ~~S YO N f i '~ ~ f.. ` i ... r ~ yyi ~ $~ mama. ~ F ~ ~ # 4 MM .. su m ~-, ~ i gggg C~ i ~ ~ r a A ~+ ~ Fix s 'GS. h'~ ' ~ 'F , . ... ue a c , " 9 ~ _ >~ ~ & o ~ ~,. O wxttl -^: a'~ < Ad fiS 'si { y f 'I~ ry T 4~ t ~" 5' { {~~y' ^Y ~f'MF ~~ 4 ~~i4 ui ~ ~ ~~~i~~w ~~ ~199C ~ ~~ ~ FFyy L ~i i~ ~'~~efY ~~ ~~~! i lu Y. ~ a ~x ~ Q Yf ' k. o~ f ~ ~ ~~ r ~eiZ3~YiR$t '~ ~'~ j4 ~~ p ~`~ r~~ ti~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~b ~ a .ati' '~ . A ~ }} 4 . Y.~5 . ,{f 1 ~~ e. ~_._ ~. ~F ~~ ~~ l n~ ~ ~ ~y if ~ .~' u ~r~ 1 iLi ~ ~ t i ., Y ~ ~ '~ +~ fµ ~' d ~~ ~ }~ ~ xi t§YfkYt ~ si RN£9 T A. 'A ~ F ~p h ~'.. 4;IR~~S ~m ~ -. s~ ~~fMl~l ~ J NEIBHBOHINO BUdDP1O STUDY C&D- 10 9NOLE FAMILY RESIDENCES .Mei. uu.c+7. IG~b LW/.Yp~S.\ GA ~Ilb DRC 200S-004W TRA 9UST7T1488 qqi 00 b~ 86n gF 3~ i • • • I • $ 6 ecruLens wu osooo-sooa Ufa °s ,0 f=ep n ~ O pp i gS1 ou.n .-' vm ~is`~~i.~.ia. SNOLLVA3~3 9 : o ~~ : g ' 'NV'Id d00tl 'SNV~d tl00V 0 d d S30N306~1 A uWVtl 3lOws ~ owmine ~ miaow sE tl 3 i e i .aA ~r „ ' ppp ~ r tl 1 ¢ ~Q 5 1~ 9A0.' ~e s 4 _ ~ ~ ~ b A b ~ ~° a =__ , P B ~r F a rc 0 0 4 O O K ^b Of ~~ J a 0 0 0 0 W N ^4 W F. oY 2 g a LL 0 rc e Of E~ n C&D- 11 °a~.~3rt ~~d~~~~ ds~~~$~~ ~~~~3~*~~ ~z~~~as~~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 5 g 6 ~ Q ` e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ gg ~ y i i ~ $ ~ g ! 5 fi ~ ~ 3 0 yy ~ $ ~ ~ y y 8 ii a y y 8 e e 8 pp i ~ ~ $ $ 4 GG S S a q W 3 9 ~ 9 ~ 1 ~ " ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ E S S 8 ~ ~ s ~ ~ F 8 & ~ ~ t t l ~ @ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ 3 6 ~ ~ f 4 ~ .. n ~ .. ~ .. ~ g n R 5 ecn,,, ,a^~wu oa ., f 4G G~ OBV00-BOOS ONO r o N a'y or n vo'vmwvan wa~.o~ Or ~y c sa~wo rwn $NDLLYA373 9 e '~ ., < Ia S30FF3o531 A~'Ni 3ZlN~ E NYId d00tl 'SNtlld tlOOli s1 $ - ' ¢° DNDllfiO Z 1300W 5! E i ~ i i dS~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ,p y y 59~ ~~3~ gg ~ ~~ ~ g g g~ggA$~~i ~ ~ ~ °gp S=ggag ~~ $~s:®9~ ~958"at3~ 2 S $ -~~ -~ ~ 2 5 ~ 2 2 O p G ~ F_ n 0 Z ~ OJ z N ~ ~ OD O ® OJ i _ 2 G o~ ~ J w F m 2 K .p ¢ Ne ~p S Ne p5 y y y i i b ~y C ppp - ~ ~ i ~i~ ~ a ii ~ 00 tl p § Q V I I F ~ G `s Ae pg® A ~ e y ~O ,A W ® E ^ _ ~ _ N ^' V 04 yy ® O ~ > O i F Q J 29 w ~ ' ~i ~ h O O ~O - c 0 n 0 n 1 A O S ~ ~ Q¢ ~ o ar i i~ ~ ~ i m ~ I c,~ ~ c c ^_ ~ i i i i A ~ q ~ Y n II d II II I 1C ~ _ I ~ = ~~ 0 ~ I~ J I- - ~ y b o O c~ -~ 6 ~ ^ ^ N1 S Ire ~, -° ~ J J o E II J n II II ~ _o ~ ^ ~~~ ~ ~ -~ ~2 b ~^ 4 p •~ P~ GA 6 ® s A 4 e ~b § ~ Eq• g s , 4 ~ i g ~ ~ ~ ~ [ 3 S y~~ d e 6 [ B `~i & E T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 a $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ 9 pp 4 ~ g g d E E d ~ i & ~ ~ ~ § ~ y & ~ ~ y § ~ °¢ ~ @ ~ 5 H C Eh 7 p ~ ~ ~ ~d ~ ~e sA € F g 8 ~e F ~ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ 9 p R ~ ~ p ~ y p ~ g p 9 ~ 3 ~ - e • • • I ~~~~ b CCV4LIHf18 YlLL ~~~Z wi. vi ~.a~w.a» wvnw NTIl1~J HA 630PH053tl A~7Vd 3tY84 f ~- ~~~ ~- i ~ ~~ ~ i __ g i : B ~ gg I T ' ~ ~ml ii l ~ I ~° g 1 O O LL p2 2 Nb og3f Ei z 5 W u z U U 2 W 0 O O N~ Of ~~ N • 2 n LL 0 ofgg 3tl e E .° S r ._ SNOLLVA3T3 9 a P '^ ~ O^ 'NVId d00tl 'ENVId tl001d 'p ° - ' ~ C ONOlII1B E 1300W 5! 5~ ~ i 5 ~ - 3~ {gi4 g ~ g~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B ~ ~ W ~ ~ yy~ Y a g yy '~ 5 2 a~ ~~ 45~ t ~ ~ @@ d s ~ ~ s ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ y ~ !~ ' ~ ~ y~ 3 ~ ~ e~ 9 e ~ gg 3 ~ @ ~ g9 ~ 5 ~ ~~ 99 4 ~ ~ aa 9 € 8 yy 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e~ 0 ~ 6 n~ B s 6 4 C&D- 13 avuuene rw. y~, ~ cerooo-soox oda ~ aa~ ocuc vo'vww.an crvaw s ; ~' p a~.. u rnvwo nc~ ®~HQ431 A~Vltld 3FMS e a vi 6NOLLYA3~3 4 3 S ~ ; `° d 'NYId d00tl 'BNY~d HOOld ° 'JlUOlfi9 / 1300W SP C ~ ~ i f ~sd Yy§ 8Q ~~~~~63~q a ~p~pe ~i $3@$a~ l~~ilt~~~~ ass ~ S a o ~ ~ $ ~ § G G LL 2 ~ ~ x ~ ~ •O i p4 _ ~ o~ a w f tt ~ ¢ ~y ap oyS ~ oS ...r ® +F ~~ ~ 3~ u of _ i I i i i ^ ~n _~ u ° T E . ¢ ° a 2 ~ ^ n ~ _ o ^° ~ b 8 q~ ~ G . ~ 5 g 9Qi O Y 9C ~ X~ - y YYY 6 O O yy C F ~ ~B ~4 ~b ~~ ~ i ® y ~y ~~ _ 4 Lk G I ® ~I oqy 'i i ~y4 _ - - IR i 3B ~~ i i h i i ~i O ~ C~ e e l ^ i i i i i i ^I7 O D -o D¢ ~0 O n b ~ ~ =fir-O ~"' ff'~-° 5, _ . ~ p~ ," I I' b - ~ ,~ ~ I rrJ~ K~I p ~~ J WS I I ~I I 0 ~"~ Q I ~I ~I b I~ v VVVI ~I ~ ~ ~+ u u ~ a ~ - -~ ~~ C & D- 14 - I " I ' ^ ® ayyY 9r ^ ~ ` ~ ® b 9b ~ ~ ~ ® ~ R~ z r ~~ ~ ~: e o ~ ~ ~ ~ i y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ 3 . + ~ j 6 9 9 i e ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F i i ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ ~ € ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ § ~ ~ ~ a '' B B ~ ~ ~ S Y ; ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ S p ~ ~ t ( g 6 g p p F g < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ gg y 4 @ ~ ~ ~ $ g pp k 3 B d • I F~~» ,LISIHX~ • 1 ~~ RR ~~ C~ • gg cef 33 @ 2 $~~ 9~ °€2~ ` € k ~k ~~~ ~,@k ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ 8p~ ~~~ ~~~ g~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ p~ ~ . 2~~4 ~dki. CEb ~~[40k Y~~ F ~ ~ r (. w '.[8911 , • ® ~ ` ~• • nip 3: ;n.tsWx ~ _ ® -^ ,. a ~ ~~~ ~ ~ Z 9~ ~~ £t a ~ yip 5~ ~~ g y ~ $. ~ ~~ R~ ~ ~ §~6 a fB~J ~y~e ~p$~e ~ ~ d ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ k .~ ~A 8p~ z o w z mm W Z~,i f Q a °m' ~ U I V a ~o O e3zmo N Z Q k j N (~3LLa ~ w o o (qNs~ ENO = W Ym0 Q pN0 rc W vi v~~ ~ Zno•a -Yi ~ ~~w 0 m n °n m k ~ m wc~ ~o ~~Na ~ $o U ~ <?o~o ~ Q N U U d Z U ~ Za K E r 0 rn K a Z E J5 Q W ... _: ~ dQ V a GW7 N u O . ~g_ € J • V V t K_ ~j~~ i. o E[ kq! € Z ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ Y~ 1RC y ~ n t $ ¢ Lk' ~ i ~ ~ ~~g~ E~ ~~I ~~ _ PO p~Y Y 2 ~ a p x. n ~ ~g d r ~ ~L7~ ~ ~ ~ @~~ ~~ d¢ a 1; 15 a 8 ~ ~~~1'! ~ ~ !F.R ~"~ ~ '~ o U ~F • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:40 p.m. Corky Nicholson March 18, 2008 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2005-00490 - DAT TAN TA - A proposal to develop nine single-family homes on 2.39 acres in the Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at 9814 Church Street - APN: 1077-311-74. Related Files; Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17433 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2005-00491 Site Characteristics: The subject site is located on the north side of Church Street and approximately 140 feet west of Pasito Avenue. The 103,930 square foot rectangular shaped vacant lot drains from northwest to southeast with an approximate grade change of 20 feet from the northwest to the southeast property line. The site is surrounded by residential dwelling units with neighboring single-story homes to the immediate north and east. The applicant will clear the site af-a~--vegetatiea to accommodate the proposed development, which includes removing the majority of the existing trees. A Consulting Arborist's Report has been provided by the applicant that describes such trees as having many problems because of the site not being properly maintained. Several of the healthier trees will be retained along the northerly and easterly property lines of the site. If this project is approved, it will provide approximately 60 new trees of various specimen types throughout the proposed development, as shown on the submitted colored Site Plan. .Currently, no structures exist on the site. Project Design Overview: The proposed development consists of a 9-lot infill subdivision, with a house product for each lot. Lot sizes for the proposed subdivision range from approximately 7,300 square feet to 14,000 square feet, which exceeds the current minimum net area requirement of 7,200 square feet. The house product consists of four floor plans: Model 1, a two-story floor plan at 3,336 square feet (excluding the garage area at 759 square feet); Model 2, a two-story floor plan at 3,263 square feet (excluding the garage area at 574 square feet); Model 3, a single-story floor plan at 2,649 square feet (excluding the garage area at 468 square feet); and Model 4, a two-story floor plan at 3,094 square feet (excluding the garage area at 708 square feet). All of the plans convey a contemporary Craftsman style and have substantial variations in the roof designs by combining gable, hip, and shed roof elements to further enhance the elevations. Also, the finished exteriors will provide color variations of stucco, vertical wood siding, ledge stone veneer, and decorative garage doors, as shown on the submitted Streetscape View plan sheet. This project, as submitted, meets the applicable height limits, setbacks, lot coverage, and area requirements, as set forth in the Development Code. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for discussion purposes. Major Issues: None Secondary Issue: In staff's opinion, each proposed chimney should be covered with a compatible ledge stone veneer, as a further enhancement. olic Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: ~XFtiBrr~ C&D- 16 f.-J 1. That the project shall provide decorative masonry block walls between the homes (i.e. along the side and rear property lines) for permanence and design consistency purposes. 2. Access gates to the rear yard areas shall be constructed of a material more durable than wood. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that, with the Secondary Issue addressed, the Committee recommend approval of the proposed development to the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Corky Nicholson Members Present: Stewart, Munoz, Diaz The Committee approved the proposal as presented by the applicant. The applicant presented revised building elevations to show compliance with staff's request to cover each chimney with compatible ledge stone veneer as a further enhancement. • • C&D- 17 • Neighborhood Meeting Summary Report Neighborhood Meeting for project at 9814 Church Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. was held on October 26, 2005 at the Rancho Cucamonga Community Centers, Lions Center West - Guasti Room. Meeting started promptly at 6:00 pm and ended at 7:00 pm. Fifteen days prior to the neighborhood meeting, notification to the local public were solicited in two ways: (1) Atlas Buying Group sent bulk mail "Invitation Letters" to the surrounding neighborhood, at a minimum of 300-foot radius. (2) "Invitation Letters" were posted on a large 4' X 8' "NOTICE OF FILING" sign in front of project site. "Invitation Letters" is attached for reference. Quite a few neighbors showed up for the meeting. The list of name aze as follow: Dawn Tran 4150 E. Contours St, Ontario, CA 932-1045 Carolyn Baty 7714 Abbot Ct., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 481-6705 Frank T. 2935 E Chino Ave, Chino Hills, CA 465-9139 Pam 7650 Pasito St. ,Rancho Cucamonga, CA 980-6276 Toby 1795 N. 1st Ave, Upland, CA. Phil & Julie Williams 7640 Pasito St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 987-0939 • T. Brown 7686 Pasito St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 980-9940 Ian Revell 9774 Church St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 941-4493 Paul & Barbara Vifau 9762 Church St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 987-7680 Michael & Elisa Fletcher 7726 Atherton Ct, ,Rancho Cucamonga, CA 941-0775 There were a couple of key concerns that were brought up: ®One neighbor on the west side of project site was concern of privacy. He was concern that second story houses will be able to view into his home. = To address this concern, we recommended that some trees will be planted in the backyazd to create a more private atmosphere. _ = In all fairness, there aze an average of 37 to 42 feet from the new house to the fence line AND an additional average of 45 to 65 feet more from the fence line to the neighbor's house. That would be a total distance of approximately 82 to 105 feet from the new home to the neighbor's houses. = I've also recently learn that the City of Rancho Cucamonga does not have any "View Rights". ~~~~a~ ~ C&D- 18 other concern was half of the proposed driveway falls on the properties of two • neighbors. Half of the driveway is 18 feet in width. = The remedy is to move the entire drive up. In other word, the drive will be move up18 feet east direction, towazds the Project Site. The entire driveway will be on the Proposed Project properties Site only. This will create fewer yazdages in front of each new houses. ~eighbor on the West side of Project Site was concern about his animal. = Currently there aze several Eucalyptus trees separating the neighbor's property and the Project Site. However, CIG will install a fence between the concerned neighbor's property and the Project Site. Pazking was another concern among the neighbors. , = Each new house will have a 3 caz garage pazking. In addition, each new house's - driveway can pazk an additional 2-3 vehicle. Pazking along the new develop street will also be an option. The developer can not prohibit public parking along the new street. If possible, the City can impose a "Residential Pazking Only" sign. One neighbor was concerned that Church Street is too narrow. She wanted to know if • there was future plan of widening the Church Street from two lanes to four lanes. = Street expansion is part of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's on-going development plan. The concerned citizen was informed to speak to the City's Planning Dept for more details of future street development. This Proposed Project Site does not have any plan to widen Church Street. • C&D- 19 • Second (2°d) Neighborhood Meetin Summary Report The Second (2"d) Neighborhood Meeting for project at 9814 Church Street, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. was held on March 20, 2006 at the Rancho Cucamonga Community Centers, Lions Center West - Opici Room. Meeting started promptly at 6:05 pm and ended at 6:50 pm. Once again, fifteen (15) days prior to the neighborhood meeting, notification to the local public were solicited in two ways: (1) Atlas Buying Group sent bulk mail "Invitation Letters" to the surrounding neighborhood, at a minimum of 300-foot radius. (2) "Invitation Letters" were posted on a large 4' X 8' "NOTICE OF FILING" sign in front of project site. "Invitation Letters" is attached for reference. Several neighbors showed interest in this new development and attended the meeting. Their names and contact information aze as follow: Name: Address: Telephone: Gele Kovalli 10424 Montclair Road, # B, Upland, CA 91286 951-830-1549 Ian Reve1L 9774 Church St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 941-4493 Rick Brulte Fontana, CA 714-2808 Paul Jieau 9762 Church St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 987-7680 Bazbaza Jieau 9762 Church St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 987-7680 Louis LeBlanc • Susan Bade Hull Project Planner- City of R.C. 77 W. Las Tunas Drive #202, Arcadia, CA 909-477-2750 During the second (2"d) meeting, there were only a few questions raised. The questions were as follow: During construction, will there be a fence or block wall alone the west side of the project? = Chain link fence will be installed prior to construction alone the west side of the project. Block wall will be installed alone the east and north side of the project. Will the street be a two way street, one side entering and one side exiting? = The new street will be a two way street, right side for entering and left side for exiting. Will the trees be removed before construction? = Yes, the trees will be removed before construction. An Arborist Report has been conducted, tree permit has been submitted, and a tree removal company will remove the trees according. ® When will the construction begin? = After all maps, documents, requirements are submitted and approved by the City, and the . Committee Review Team consent with the project, then the construction will commence. This could be another year from date of this meeting. C&D-20 • Rol and Associates Consulting Arborist and Tree Service 1405 Barnhart Lane -Norco, CA. 92860 Phone (951) 279-6096 Mobile (951) 315-4013 Consultation Report May 16, 2005 Submitted To: COreation Investments Group 2V55 ralhway Vr. EI Monte, CA 91732 Attention: Dat Ta Job Address: 9814 Church St. ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91732 • I inspected the lot, located at 9814 Church St., and found many problems with the existing trees on the property which are described as follows: • • 10 Italian Cypress trees (approximately 15' tall) in a row starting on the SouthNVest corner, which appear healthy, with only a little sign of stem borer's. • 15 Eucalyptus trees (in excess of 36" DBH and ranging from 30' - 75' tall) which are all either dead or showing signs of serious decline from Longhorn Boring Beetle, Lurp Syllid, and Tortoise Beetle damage. • 1 Oiive tree (L - 14" DBH co-tlominant stems) located in the back, left, NorthNVest corner of the property which is healthy but has poor structure. This is not a specimen tree due to structural defects. • 2 African Sumac trees (8" DBH; 20' tall) located in the middle yet toward the North/East portion of the property which appear healthy. • 2 Juniper trees (15' tall) located in the center of the property. These two trees are in poor condition. • 1 Oak Quercus Agrifolia tree (14" DBH; approximately 30' tall) located on the East side of the property. This tree has very poor structure and unfortunately it has been vandalized by what appears to be children building a fort underneath the tree. This is not a specimen tree due to structural defects. ~x~~~rrs c & o- 2, • Many (approximately 20) Citrus trees, mostly Lemon, (under 15' tall) • located in the middle of the property are showing signs of drought damage. 1 Walnut tree (3 co-dominant stems of 15", 12" and 8"; main trunk at grade stems 24") located on the right (East) side and toward the front of the property. This tree is healthy but it has poor structure thus making it not a specimen tree. 1 Mulberry tree (10" DBH; 3 co-dominant stems) located on the right (East) side toward the front of the property. The structure of this tree is very poor. 2 Shamill Ash trees (6" DBH) located in the South/East corner, toward the front of the property, which are healthy. E 1 Vl~ashington Fi!!ifera {30" DBH; approximately 15' tall) located in the front (South) center of the property, which is health. Many 10' - 15' shrubs throughout the property in various states of decline from the lack of water. As an arbbrist my job is to save and help protect trees. Unfortunately this property has never been properly maintained. Any help I can be of in the future to help preserve, move or maintain any of the trees on this list please feel free to call. • Sincerely, ~~--~ Dale D. P.oley Contractor's License #830694 Certified Arborist #0567 C&D-22 • RESOLUTION NO. 08-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17433, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 2.39 GROSS ACRES OF LAND INTO 9 LOTS IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHURCH STREET, 140 FEET WEST OF PASITO AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-311-74. A. Recitals. 1. Dat Ta filed an application for the subdivision of Tentative Tract SUBTT17433, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of May 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the • City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 28, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located is on the north side of Church Street, 140 feet west of Pasito Avenue, with a street frontage of 164.95 feet and lot depth of approximately 630 feet and is presently vacant; and b. The subject property is bordered by existing single-family residential developments on the north, east, and west that are within a Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), and to the south, across Church Street, there is an existing single-family residence and multiple-family units within a Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and c. The project is designed in conformance with the Low Residential standards; and d. The design of the project, including site grading and drainage, will provide efficient use of land to accommodate single-family homes. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission • hereby finds and concludes as follows: C&D-23 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-27 SUBTT17433 - DAT TA May 28, 2008 Page 2 • a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any. applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, which covers in-fill developments which meet the following criteria: 1) the project is consistent with the General Plan as well as with applicable zoning regulations; 2) the subject site is no more than 5 acres; 3) the project has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; 4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effect on the environment (traffic, noise, air quality , or water quality); and 5) the site is adequately • served by all required utilities and public services. Having determined that the project meets all of the above criteria, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The related Tree Removal Permit shall be subject to the condition that all of the rear yard areas are planted with sod, as a minimum ground cover material for dust control purposes due to the high wind area, and that the additional landscaping requirement be incorporated into the final landscape plan. 2) The developer shall have a licensed real estate appraiser evaluate the value of the neighboring land, and verify that the applicant had made a "good-faith" offer to acquire enough additional right-a-way from the adjacent property owners to complete a standard knuckle. Engineering Department 1) Church Street frontage improvements shall be installed in accordance with City • "Secondary Arterial" standards including, but not limited to, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, signing, striping, street trees, street lights, etc. C&D-24 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-27 SUBTT17433 - DAT TA May 28, 2008 • Page 3 a) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk or protect/replace existing improvements. b) Provide two 9500 Lumen HPSV street lights. c) Provide R26(s) "NO PARKING ANY TIME" signs along Church Street frontage. d) Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. e) Provide a Class II Bike Lane. f) Transition the pavement, west of the new Street "A" to join existing pavement, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2) Provide adequate sight line visibility on the north side of Church Street, west of the proposed new Street "A", by removing obstructions within existing rights-of-way. Also make a good faith effort to obtain permission from the adjacent property owner to remove line-of-sight obstructions located on private property. ' 3) . Proposed new Street "A" shall be improved in accordance with City "Local • Residential Street" standards including, but not limited to, curbs and gutters, property line adjacent sidewalk, street trees, drive approaches, and signing and striping, as required. a) Provide curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the east side, including the knuckle. b) Provide four 5800 Lumen HPSV street lights. c) Install as much of a standard knuckle as obtained right-of-way permits. d) Centerline crown shall be 18 feet west of the east curb line. 4) Driveway on corner Lot 1 shall be located as far from the Church Street intersection ECR as possible to minimize conflicts and improve visibility between vehicles turning right and vehicles backing out of said driveway. 5) Corner side yard wall on Lot 1, along Church Street, should be at the top of slope and at least 3 feet behind the sidewalk (5 feet if trees are proposed between the wall and sidewalk). 6) The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire 12 to 30 feet of right-of-way, and enough additional right-of-way to complete a standard knuckle (plus temporary construction easements), from adjacent property owners so that local street and knuckle can be constructed in full. If unsuccessful, the proposed 48-foot dedication is acceptable. Install a minimum 30-foot pavement • width including slopes as needed to match existing grade along the west tract boundary. C&D-25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-27 SUBTT17433 - DAT TA May 28, 2008 Page 4 a) If all the necessary right-of-way is obtained from adjacent properties, install City standard knuckle per Standard No. 110. If all right-of-way is not obtained, install as much'of the knuckle as possible on-site. b) Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 7) An in-lieu fee as 'contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical), on the project side of Church Street shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage. a) If existing power poles need to be relocated to install street improvements, consider placing these facilities underground instead. b) Existing pole off-site to the west may need to be relocated for line-of-sight purposes. 8) Install private landscaping and irrigation system in the parkway of the corner lot along Church Street prior to public improvements being accepted by the City. • 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY 2008. • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Pam Stewart, Chairperson ATTEST: James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of May 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • C&D-26 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT _, STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17433 SUBJECT: 9-LOT SUBDIVISION APPLICANT: DAT TA LOCATION: NORTHSIDE OF CHURCH STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: ~. General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. OS-27, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The protect planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Duector hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. • Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- SC-1-05 1 C & D- 27 Project No. SUBTT17433 Completion Date 2. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if _/_/_ building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. • C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include _/_/_ site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions _/_/_ of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and ~_/_ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for _/_/_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be _/_/_ located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 6. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the _/_/_ • adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 7. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine _/_/_ animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 8. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the _/_/_ Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 9. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property _/_/_ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling _/_/_ unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. • C&D-28 Project No. SUBTT17433 Comoletion Date 11. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice • requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 12. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work.with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. D. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 3. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 4. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. • 5. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 6. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the project landscape architect shall certify on the submitted plans that the xeriscape requirements have been met. E. Environmental The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; • c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; -/-/ -/-/ -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- ~-/- -/-/- 3 C&D-29 Project No SUBTT77433 Completion Date e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (SUBTT17433) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and W orkers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. G. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTT17433). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development projector major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permts issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. H. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. Grading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. . 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to pertorm such work. -/-/- -/-/- ~-/- ~-/- -/_/. -/-/ -/-/ ~-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- • J u C&D-30 Project No. SUBTT17433 Completion Date 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. • 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on Church Street. 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. ~. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. • -~-~- -~-~. -~_~. -~-~ -~-~- ~~- -~-~- -~-~- ~-~- 5 C&D-31 Project No. SUBT717433 Completion Date 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Slde- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Church Street X X X X X Street "A" X X X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall.be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. _~-/ -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- • -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- • C&D-32 Protect No. SUBTT17433 Completion Date 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Oty. CHurch Street Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3 ft. 20 ft. o.c. 15-gal. "Saint Mary Street "A" Select from City approved list at Plan Check Construction Notes for Street Trees:*Quantity per approved Public Improvement Plans. 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Priorto the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. ~~ Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. T • Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. -~-~- -~-~ -~-~. -~-~- -~-~- -~-~ 7 C&D-33 Protect No SUBTT17433 Completion Date 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. _/_/_ Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. • N. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all _/_/_ new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or priorto building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall _/_/_ be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED • • C&D-34 .o;,..',~:~ ~, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District s ~ ~~~ '; • _°-Yk-_° Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS July 17, 2006 ICM Management 9814 Church SUBTT17433 & DRC2005-00490 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal have approved a requests for alternate method (PMT2007-02730), as submitted. Parking will only be permitted on one side of the street; all the homes and garages will be equipped with AFS in accordance to NFPA 13D. The alternative method will allow the subdivision and construction of the homes before the road improvements aze made on the adjacent pazcels FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply ]. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: • a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: I . At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20- pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Firewater plans aze required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. ~C-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water pply from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application C&D-35 °Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Mazshal have approved a requests for alternate method (PMT2007-02730), as submitted. Parking will only be permitted on one side of the street; all the homes and garages will be equipped with AFS in accordance to NFPA 13D. The alternative method will allow the subdivision and construction of the homes before the road improvements are made on the adjacent parcels • FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any, combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standazd #9-.7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for 'obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. • PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement mazker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Mazkers". On private property, the mazkers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. • C2& D- 36 • RESOLUTION NO. 08-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2005-00490, A PROPOSALTO DEVELOP NINE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON 2.39 ACRES IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHURCH STREET, 140 FEET W EST OF PASITO AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN:1077-311-74. A. Recitals 1. Dat Ta filed an application for DevelopmenUDesign Review DRC2005-00490, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject DevelopmenUDesign Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of May 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17433. 3. On the 28th day of May 2008, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. • 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 28, 2008, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specificallyfinds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Church Street, 140 feet west of Pasito Avenue, with a street frontage of 164.95 feet and lot depth of approximately 630 feet, and is presently vacant; and b. The subject property is bordered by existing single-family residential developments on the north, east, and west that are within a Low Residential District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), and to the south, across Church Street, there is an existing single-family residence and multiple-family units within a Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre); and c. The project is designed in conformance with the Low Residential standards; and d. The design of the project, including site grading and drainage, will provide efficient use of • land to accommodate single-family homes. C&D-37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-28 DRC2005-00490 - DAT TA May 28, 2008 Page 2 • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. .That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under state CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, which covers in-fill developments which meet the following criteria: 1) the project is consistent with the General Plan as well as with applicable zoning regulations; 2) the subject site is no more than 5 acres; 3) the project has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; 4) approval of the project would not result in any • significant effect on the environment (traffic, noise, air quality , or water quality); and 5) the site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Having determined that the project meets all of the above criteria, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is subject to all applicable conditions of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17433 and City Council approval of Final Tract Map 17433. 2) Avoid identical color schemes plotted on adjacent lots. 3) Provide decorative perimeter fencing (i.e., masonry) at tract edges and along streets. "Decorative" means stucco finish, split face block, or similar textured surface with native stone pilasters and a cap. ,Smooth precision block is not acceptable. 4) Retaining walls exposed to public view shall be decorative masonry. Engineering Department ~ • 1) All applicable conditions of the approving resolution(s) of Tentative Tract 17433 shall apply. C&D-38 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 08-28 DRC2005-00490 - DAT TA May 28, 2008 • Page 3 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MAY 2008. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Pam Stewart, Chairperson James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of May 2008, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: • NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: • C&D-39 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2005-00490 SUBJECT: 9SINGLE-FAMILY HOM APPLICANT: DAT TA LOCATION: NORTHSIDE OF CHURCH STREET, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: General Requirements 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees maybe required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 08-28, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the City Engineer within 3 years from the date of the approval. u SC-1-OS Completion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- C & D- 40 Project No. DRC2005-00490 Completion Date C. 2. Conditional Use Permit, Variance, or DevelopmenUDesign Review approval shall expire if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval. No extensions are allowed. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Cocle and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected far compliance prior to occupancy. 4. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 5. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 6. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 7. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 8. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 9. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first: The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. -/-/- • -/~- -/-/- -/-~- -/-/- -/~- -/-/~ ~_/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- • 2 C&D-41 Project No. DRC2005-00490 11. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice • requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 12. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. D. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Front yard and cornet side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 3. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the requred landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Department. 4. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. • 5. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 6. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the project landscape architect shall certify on the submitted plans that the xeriscape requirements have been met. E. Environmental The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; • c. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; Completion Date -/-/ -/-/ -/- - -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/ -/-/- C& D-42 Protect No. DRC2005-00490 Comoletion Date G. H e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; • f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2005-00490) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. _/_/_ Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to _/_/_ the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/_/_ contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be _/_/_ marked with the project file number (DRC2005-00490). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or _/_/_ major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program • deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tracUparcel map _/_/_ recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/_/_ through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances _/_/_ considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. _/_/_ 3. ' Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. _/_/_ Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading _/_/_ Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to _/_/_ perform such work. • 4 C&D-43 Protect No. DRC2005-00490 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. • 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on Church Street. 3. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. . Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, communitytrails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 88-557, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. • Comoletion Date -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- -/-/- _/_/ 5 C&D-44 Project No. DRC2005-00490 Completion Date 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements Including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter AC. Pvmt Sitle- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Church Street X X X X X Street"A" X X X X X X 4. Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public andlor private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being pertormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. -~-~- • -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- • -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- • 6 C & D- 45 Project No. DRC2005-00490 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street • improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet_(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size dty. Church Street Magnolia grandiflora NCN 3 ft. 20 ft. o.c. 15-gal. ' "Saint Mary Street "A" Select from City approved list at Plan Check Construction Notes for Street Trees:'Quantity per approved Public Improvement Plans. t) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. M. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. • Completion Date -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- -~-~- _/~. C&D-46 Project No DRC2n05-00490 Completion Date 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. N. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Anon-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable it at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED -~-~- • -~-~- -~-~- • • s C&D-47 ' ', . ~., July 17, 2006 ICM Management 9814 Church Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS SUBTT17433 & DRC2005-00490 ' THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal have approved a requests for alternate method (PMT2007-02730), as submitted. Pazking will only be permitted on one side of the street; all the homes and garages will be equipped with AFS in accordance to NFPA 13D. The alternative method will allow the subdivision and construction of the homes before the road improvements aze made on the adjacent parcels FSC-I Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No • portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet. b. Fire hydrants aze to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1. At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. 2. At intersections. 3. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible. 4. As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. 5. A minimum of forty-feet (40') from any building. FSC-2 Fire Flow The required fire flow for this project is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20- pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until firewater plans are approved. On al] site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. ~ y Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water ,:' , from a public or private water main system before construction. FSC-1~ Alternate Method Application C&D-48 "'Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Mazshal have approved a requests for alternate method (PMT2007-02730), as submitted. Pazking will only be permitted on one side of the street; all the homes and garages will be equipped with AFS in accordance to NFPA 13D. The alternative method will allow the subdivision and construction of the homes before the road improvements aze made on the adjacent parcels FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the pazcel map into the Community Facilities District • #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard #9-8 All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standazd #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A cun•ent fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. • PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION -Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: Al] fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standazd Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the mazkers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the pubic roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. CAD-49 Staff Report DATE: May 28, 2008 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Mahdi Alurzi, Deputy City Manager/Community Development BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENGINEERING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008/09 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Attached for your review is the Engineering Division's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for fiscal year 2008/09. The projects have been categorized by type of project (Beautification, • Drainage, Facilities, etc.), which are in alphabetical order within a category. A map showing the project locations is also attached. A summary of project costs by category is shown on the cover page. There are a total of 102 projects for a little over $122,000,000. This item has been reviewed and approved by the City Council Public Works Subcommittee. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find the Capital Improvement Program in conformance with the General Plan. fitted, i Alurzi y City Manager/Community Development Attachments: FY 2008/09 Capital Improvement Program Project Location Map • ITEM E ~J • u Z O 0 O O O O 0~ C7 O O O O O O O O O O M cWc O N O ~- O 1 O O O O to /~ V G ~ N ~ (O m O M W N GND V Z ~ L.L N N E M M N N_ ~' w O O ~ f9 f9 VT fR fA to f9 EA fA fA EA U ~~ ~~ Z~ ~ O } r (O ~ O O N ~'~ ~ N N N O U wo wN ~ p a~ ~~ z_ ~ w ~ qw ~ Z J W W r ~ J ~ L, Z d Q ~ ~ ~ y O) LL ~ r Z W -~ LL H ~ w : r 'y Z ~ o +_' o : N ~ p U J V ~ Q U ~ w aiyc ~ : ~~ N .p_ ~ y y Q H O ~ C '~'b y Y ~ ~ N 'O .~ H U m~ii~~d _ ~ in~l~ QaOU~LLiu: C72_~ C .~ l0 t U_ L 3 N N N N N N L J C O a v N 0 rn °: U U N c ~_ 3 c ~ U O N N '~ O a m c s 'c o- c ~ 'rn c d - a v d w N N ~ (0 ~ F- cyNi O llJ p U ~- N ~ d E L J U F- c E-2 000 0 000 0 0 0 0 ° 0 v o00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O_ O O_ O O_ O_ O_ O O O O N N O O O O ~+ GDO a0 O 1n 10O - O lf7 _ O ~O~ D7 _ 10 _ OQ Q _ O 7 N< N N ~ - n O O O ~ O O n n n O GD O t0 ~ M W ~- Q M O O N ~ N M • q 0 O O O O O O O O ' ~N ~ ~ N O ~ O O ~" 00 O ~ N a Q ~ ~ F O ~ ( p (O ( O M M C o O O V ~ N ' O m ~iA O ~ ~n ~n ~n ~n co u , u~ ~n m c0 m n 0 0o m ~ o0 ' 0 0 0 00 0 5 ' 00 0 ~ u~ u~ u ~ u~ ~n .n ~n ~ ~n u~ m in u~ ~n Q o ~ ~ ~~ o ~ ~ ~ o o u i 7 u i u i ~ ~~ ~ (O M M M M M M ~p ~ M ~ MM M M W O O ~ M d C '>G D M O N m ~~ r N O ~ O O ~ O Q ~ ~ ~ N~ N ~ - ~ r 1n rl0 . - OO O C ~ c r r r N ~ N r N N O N ~ ~ ~ c LL Z W ~ ~ ~ >- d a~ o LL d E -~ c m ~ v m m~ w m Q ~ V c o c c .~ c c Z ~ U o :~ m m m o o a i N ~~ p p 3 ~ ~~ ~ K o ti c p d m g m w ~ m~ v= o N U . ~ ` - m ~ v ~ w N ur d d d ' ~ 10 d d c 3 Q c Q m 'a Q C i ~ a r a i LL m F U L O J. Q_' O C m U~ LL' 01 a o c ~ p W ~ U o m ~ m ` E o ~ c ~ d W J o O 1] ~ N N LL C N p L O ~ m o °- ~ E °. u, . c a ~ a o c ` o m ~ ~ o O N U = C G V J _ m ~ = U ~ 2 d ~ ~ c ~ N H ~o o ~ c c c ~ N m o U Q spa c ~ i ~ E ,-. N ~ E N V U ~ p ~ N Nom"' C TC d O N.T d Q ~ ` om Y p = EU 5, E ~ ~ m m e U . _ E ~ ~ m c Z Z. O~ ~ O~ m m p L ~ .-. O) Vl « D O ~ U « UJ N ~ U C (0 C _ N C Q O Z O N N ~ J C - N ~` l0 LL' O C O l0 ~ ~ LL O C p Q U V c' ~ o m a c o ~~ o ~ ~ (0 U ~- •N N C U 3 N ~ N ~ l0 V N LL O. G O .O O O C ` O O C >' L c O~ C N p > v p C O 7 N ~ O ~ 7 C > O = 0 U d O U d C c m ( j ~ U V ',~~n i U C 0 7 E ~ > ~ N O O. i t0 N Z ~ . N d p - . . W « r+ ~ Q ~ ~ C O N f~ C ~ N ~ ~ N LL •0 3 y Z,v V y c ~ E Z p c } U ~ m a W ; 2 ~ d m Q U ~ W~ ~ ~ L U U • l ~ ~ ~ r N M Q ~ O r N U z a m U E-3 O N O ~ O 0 O O O O 0 O O O O O O O „~,~ O r O R t 0 O O 0 1 O O O O O O M C O 0~1 O O ~ O O N O ~ 0 0 0 O Oi 7 N N M N t 0 r O .- t0 N M N r0 O E ~ c ni .- co ,n • Q N ~ O O ~ O 7 N ~A r ~ O ui O Q~ 0] ~ O a~0 ' r ~ r~+ (D V O V' (O l0 (O N ~ N u7 ~O N 1~ l0 O ~ O O M p ~~ n 0 o n N C ~ ~ M (~O u09 ti ~ ~ 0 d r ~ ~ ( 0 O (O V O LL7 O In O ~ O 47 O In O LL7 O In ~ ll~ ~ O ~~ LL'1 llO ~ lp0 ~ llO V Q CO ~ (O tD ~ (D (O (O ~ (O (O ~O tD ~ N LL M r r ~ M C ~ O O O ~ O ~ O O o ~ O M On O r D ~ ( j c O G C N 0 ~ T aD t 0 O a~0 r n tD R O C ~ C f D N (O 4 '1 N ~ N M ~ f~ O r r N ~- N r r O N ~ ~ N Z U 2 aZi ~ o o o LLLLJJ ~ . y . ~ } ~ ~ d ~ o ~ ~ c Q U U o o . N o ~ °~ E c U U °- a V °- N ~ m LL U N LL LL m W ~ ~ d ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ N 0° ' ~ a ~ U ~ ~ iL p ~ _ 3 ` ° ~ ' ° ~U m m 0 a _ O a ~ •z t _ N ` W y > N C c O) O > _ ~ °- a ~ E ~ ~ a ~~ ~ o ~ C G ~ ~ J - f0 C J ~ o a ~ ' o ~ Y y ~ ~ c ~ w ~ N c ~ a - ~ ~ o m ~ w Q U U Ol ~ ~ (n U ~ y ~ ~ m '. -o ~ m ~ rn o o in N ~ ~ T = C .-- N ~ ~ Y U ~ Q C9 p~ L ? D7 ~ C O y O S 11 ~~ - L.N. O 'v T L (n ~ ~ O ~ . N. Z ~ C] ~ ~ O j N Q ~ d d f0 f0 O O N . N C ~ N Q N C c " N L ~ . . f O 1 ~ j ~ ~ l6 ~ J O L 0 - . , U = N L d O ~ U V~ N N lCQ N ~` 7 l U Q U ' V o O Q N m z~ ~ o ~C ~ 2 ~ ~ 2 ~ °" L11 ~ m ~ ~ o y -o c ~ m e ~: N ~ d Y N= d p l N~ (0 W O ~ ~ N U _ N 1 V . ..N. N 'C C 'C l0 r N ~~ .~ ~ y O d 0_ C ,~ m C N ~ d N d a d ,~ d !n O O N U ~ E: c9 (n U N N ,. U U N N U N f0 N N N ~. L Z 3 O N C ~ ~ N ~ U ~ C D y D y N N.L.. U -y ~ m N N a m W O U y > N N O U G V Q C O d _> U > U d U L d y U d ~ N B O d ~ ~ Q Q N y • L W W LL .. = ~ ~ ~ m U m~ 1~ M C ~O (O I~ oD O) O N M V z '~ p rn 0 N N N a E-4 ^ 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O .p .. OOO O O 0 0 0 0 OOOOO O O 0 0 00 t0 u'1 0 0 0 OOJO f~ O 1~ NON M ~+ C 000 (O V O O r ~ M ON 00 r t0 NO ~~I~ rOlr pj~(p p r M N rN r M 'O 'O ~ C ~ M N E N CV r r ~ Q • O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O •• LOO t 0 O S O O N 0 0 7 0 0 O 7 a' ~. ~ N L O N f 0 N r N Q) r N r N O O O (O r O (O O r r (V r N ~ v F-' ~ ' ' M In 47 l0 t0 N V V N llY r ~~~ "" M M y C l0 10 ~ M (O tD (O (O 44 11 (p (p ~p ~p 7 .~ O r\ r r r r r r r r r O r p 0 0 ' 0 o O O O o ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m ~ U In 1! ) 47 ~ 47 47 LL 1 In 4n l{') In {~ {(J l0 Il') C U (O (O (O c0 (O (O fD (O (O (O (O (O f0 (O t0 ~ e0 Q ~ ~ M ~ M ~ u~ ~n ~n in in ~ u~ ~n ~n ~n ~n O r 0 0 0 ~ O ~ p O , ~ O O O O 0 ` O p W { j ~ M OO M OD O t 7 M M M M M M M M M ' ~ X00 N i0 O u70 O N 00 V 00 O 7 ~ ~ N N T ~ O N r~ r 3 O ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ r r N g ~ r N r r r r r r O N Q W J Q ¢ E E O v Z Z Z ~ ~ Q m~ ~ H y c a c a m c a c~ U N r N ~ y 0 0 O O (, ~ O O O p ( n ~ ~ ~ ~ O lO j C ' _ ~p j M .~ N _ ~((pp H _ 0 U (0 U U> U N LL ~N N DU R'~- ~~ ~ ~=~ w . ~ J ~ N N 7 D ' ~ (O N f0 H N N W d N N N LL U2 U Q' Uaoaao maa ma min O) a a ~ ~• O E > ja v d r~ ~ ~ w m o m~ ~ a °' a ~ a ~ lC C .-. ~ f0 ~ C ~ U W W d ~ d ~ 'NO N N (~ N Q W= Y U N U~ L m f6 C ~ ~ ~ E O f6 U 61 C > ~ d N ;O ~ Of Q m E 2 m o o a v 2 ~~ (0 E C N a w ~ r~ - w C ~° ~~ ~c gs Q c ~'O 5 m U ~ ~ ''->U v n U m . V" r U~ U 2 W DLO N f0 C 01 A N rO y O C . (0 w ~ U N O -~ ~ O y ~ O y 0 Q ~ Y O U U C C 7 d O O~ a v c E 'o a ' ~ W'~O y' - o io ~ 3 `° y > O? `° O ~ m ~ `° o ~n > ~ ~L d ~ m ~ U rn ' (~ rn ~ c B V Q N ~ V U N .N ~ d C y U ~`^ ~L °' m0 m o v E ~~ W ~ m > O o o~ U ~ y N a - N ' _ o o m 2 ' d ` ° a ~ C ~ c ~ Q o o - w K~ ~~ K~ U c - U y= 7 C 'O V> V> V N ~ ~p O~ C m L n L a N F- N f0 v ~ ~ l f L E d f0 a d m ~-' l9 w o ~= - U ~= - U '= > _o, •V LL O ` Z N Z fn o U '~ U '~ U N N y N ~_ O a U° v rn ii aF- aH as >° ~ • ° v ~n co r~ ro ' rn o U z `- LLI E-5 0 o 0 0 0 0 'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v c? 0 0 0 0 o in o ao 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~+ ~ 1~ 0 M O I~ O N 0 ~ N ~ Q) ~ N T O N 47 n O ~ W O 1t7 O O 0 O O N r • Q O O ~ O ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N NO N N O N r O N O N O N O N O N ~ 0 ~ 0 W 0 ~ r O) ^ O N 0I f~ t0 O n r r O a 0 m ~ b ~ W ~ 00 C N N N f0 (00 (00 ~ (0D t0 O O ~ O ~ O i N ~ 0 ~ `~ r r r r D r ( p r f 0 0 0 (0 t 0 ( 0 ~ p V O ll7 ~ O ~ O l0 O ~ O l0 O 4'7 O 1f] O t O O r O r O r O r O r O r O ~ ~ 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O l!7 l0 O 47 O 47 47 ll7 10 1n 0 Q l0 ~ 1 0 j 4 l0 l 0 10 '1 LL 1 01 10 l 0 l0 l 0 l0 ~ l0 l 0 10 l 0 ID N ~ ~ 4 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ M O ~ 0 O 0 M O M O OD r M O M O M O M O M O O t0 M N M M M ~ M ~ ~ N N N ~ N N ~ N N N N aa 0 ~ Cp ~ 0 ~ p p ~ ~ r ~ Or r r N r r r r r O W 0 a0 07 0 O N Q ~. d 0) ~ N C O C O C O C O C O a ~ Z ~ ~ o d n d d n N a O) N N Q . m n a n Z E E E E E ~ o N y o o ~ 0 0 0 0 o N d ~ ~ a, ~ m > m ~ d ~ a~ > a~ > ~ ~ d > d > ~ > d > d > a1 ~ a~i d a~i ~i LL O ~ U O D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ .o ~ ~o cog ~ ~ O O 0 0 C ~ ~. d ~ ~ Q Y Y Y Y ` d 0 D ~ 0 0 0 0 C7 L d d d ' a a a { U U Q a a U a a a a a • a z w w 0 a .~ Q E a ~ c > ~ d p O IL N Q c ~ ~ m o m - . C .1 d ~ ~ a 1 E l0 .N. _ O to > l0 a j ~ ' ~ 7 ~ C N ~ m C N Z ~ Q ~ C E > .N _ p C C ~ N ~ d ~ N E J U ° LL a J O ~ ,.~~ y ~ ~ ~ o o J m C d ~~ ~ m o m ii oa a ~' O d ~ 01 ~ E L ~ d ~ ~ .Y ~ -p Y E C ~ L V N ~~ U U O C vC O m o ~ C _ OS ~ N f6 d d C W G J Q N Ip N (~ O ~ N L d C rn Y E m ~ ~ L d ~ 0) '00 - Y Y ~ ' (36 L C a 0 ~ W Z K ~j (0 L O 0) L O ~ ~ N N J d L O Y N 07 1 i > i U U d U U a a LL . N W ~ Y ~ Y I J ~> 0) a Y Y ~ T Y Y ~ ` ` 1 Y ~ Y Z U U Y 01 f0 ~ ' U~ Y (0 d D. C ~ a a 07 a f0 f0 l0 Q .. > > m m a a ~ ~ E ~ a~ ~ a~ d d a a a~i y ~ ~ °' d ~ ~ a ~~ d m m ~ m m ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ 3 o . . 2 x 2 x Q i a a i i a a i a i d o d ~ ~ Q `y `m d m a~i a~i • (y a a m m m m U U D w C9 x x.~ x x m ~ ~ ~ r r N M V 47 (0 1~ 0 O) O r N ~ C u7 t0 T U z u: r c - r r m a a a E-6 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 y ~ 0 0 , 0 0 o co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ++ C O O O N O N O 10 O O N t0 O O O O O O 000 O O O 0 O 0 N 7 ~ M O M O M O tl'1 10 M N M O l0 ~ ~ O r ~ M 0 C <`O'1 r M M Q • O O O O O O O O O O O O O a0 a0 O ~ O N «~ O ~ O (00 m ~ ~ ~ 0 N N ~ m ~ r O ~ ~ ~ t 0 0 ~ r+ '001 ~ O N u07 N ~ N O (O O 0 0 n ~ O ~- C (O N l0 N O ~ M C M (p (p ( j M ~ O r r r ~ p O O O O O a O N O O O O O O O V 10 (O l0 f0 t0 (O 10 (O t0 tD t0 (O N O N Q u7 10 u7 ~ O ~ O ~ O f0 (O (O t0 M M M ~ ~ M r O 10 M M M U O M O M O M r O O M O ~ O p> OD N O LL7 O ~ 9 10 N O M M M p M M ~ ~ r r N ~ p ~ 0 N Obi OD a 0 a 0 ~ ( D r r ( 0 O. r r r ~ N r r ~ N r r O C' N o co ~ ~ J a c h ~ U ~ ~ y ~ ° ~ m ° ° m ~ . LL ~ ~ > ~ > 0 ~ ~ c a > a 1 0 d o ,~ t0 l0 0 (~ O N N ~ 7 d d N Y Y C N U1 O ~ ~ D f0 f6 l0 ~ ~ ~ d ( 0 N O LL a a a U a r ~ a ~ ` ~ F d C7 O ~ ~ a z 0 w `_ ~ ~ m ~ m = °- W ~ ~ • m E 0 4 i C L ~ ~ a p ,~ o c ~ >o aci ~ aci ~ E c ~ ~ a ~ o ~ ~ f- v '6 ~ m s m m d 0. m ~ ~ a o ~ 0 C N V O y ~ N i c C m W Q ~ ~ . > m d ~ o a ~ N ~ c Q n ~ ~ d a; m c~ E ~ o a N ~ ~ Z ~ O U m m Cl ' p N 0 m ~ _ N > c o~ m ~_ U o a 1 N L N c N O d l0 J U W ~ ~ ~- d 'O C > C ~ E L ~ .- m ~+- °3 c ~ 4? ~ ~ Q U ~ u" ~ ~ ~ m mo 5~ >^ E ~~ 3 ~ °' ~ '° t m ~ ~ .~? Q ~ ¢ r m c ~ ° m U a c i v W of a1 C ~ m u~ ~~ c s O ~ _ ~ E o O LL 2' H 'O _ Q O Y C ~ - O f0 ~ ~ . f0 .~ _ N _ Z ~ ~ ~ N U1 y O C~ O N T ._ U N ~~ . ~ C V Y Y ~ i U N l0 ~ m 'O ~ O 'O Z (6 f0 E (0 f0 V N - j ~ ~ C ~ d' ~ 2' U ~' a 4- U a a 9 Q ~ o „s d m to ~ 'o c o c 0 ~ O LL ~ N d ~ O O) N C N~ N 'O N ~ a d ~ ~ v> l9 > c0 > (p x? N ¢~ dr° m mW m¢ m • ~ O O1 O N N N r ~ N M V l0 (O U Z ~ _ E-7 V 0 u~ 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0° ool °0 0 0 0 0 0 1n o 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 °o c "' ~ O 1 O M O M ~ ~ ~ ~ O 7 ~ N OJ M ~ 0 10 l0 aO R l0 E ao Ni r • a ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° 4 0 0 0 0 O N ~ 'V' ~ C' O O C t0 (O N C N f0 ~ O (D ~ (D N r r 0 ~ I n ., NO ^ ~ M r M 0 1 T 01 m ro ao ° m O1m °rn C-j c co co m ~ ca ~ ~ m m m 1n m co o ,°n ,o io o ~ ~ 0 0 0 u'1 0 u7 0 10 0 0 C ~ ~ ` ° ° ° m co co 0 0 l0 0 10 0 V' M ~ M M M tl7 t[) 47 1 0 M 1 0 M ~ M 1 0 M ~ 01 M M M M ~ O O O 0 0 M CO,1 O O O O p Q N ~ 7 d' O O C V' tD V 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 1fi (O N N I~ O) i~ t` 00 ~ c0 (D p r r r r N N r r r r O N ~ Q W } J m m V p c o c o ¢¢ ~- f- 0 0 m _ ~ m ~ r c LL O d O O N N O O ~ ~ ~ `1 d 9 ~ N N N N ' N N y O J ~ 1 ~ m O C ~ af0i m m p p ~ ~ d o N ~ N f0 LL U F- ~ H H ~ R' H F- ~ i a r a i d C ~ O O ° m • ~ - g 3 c a ~ W m 2 N v a1 W a ° rn ~ m m c ~ ~ w E ~ a o U ~ ~ c a~ o ~ c ~ c E =• ~ o ~ i a a o1 ~ ~ 3 d i a 's ~- ~ N 'o ~ ~ ~ m m w m ~ r c no ~3 0 E 3 ~~ Eo ~~ ~ ~ ~ O . L c (0 ~ N NN ~~ O ~ O ` C '00 O pY ~ ~ C N _' ~ a ~~ ~ Y W " ~ ~ ~~ ~ V r 3 a ~ c m , >° v1 ~ > a c~ o m na ~ o E c a i E ¢¢ a1 •y ~ m Q E N ~ N ~ m m ~ v ~ o ~ 3~ o E c > c ~ d ~ ¢ (7 m% ~~ L ° U i 3 m o ~ Z = s° m w o cm E3 ° i m ~ O o x ~ v iw - a ~ i o U ~ d C ~~ U w _ C - rL M o L m ? ~ J : O d ~ ~ m m O > L E Q J a . m 3 00 3 ~ m o ~ c ~ a1 ~ 3 5 a; m ¢ J U ~ L U ' O L O ¢ U1 ° ~ V n Q' = V O f0 _ N O V C h O~ r j O j > E L S C p O~ f4 C C (0 O 2 > (~ ¢ i O , O l9 V1 l9 ~ ~ V N O ~ N ¢ ~ O N N 2 mU a1U ~ o ~ o ~ U vp U a1 mo > > U j U C C ~ C m C an d m N m C ¢ a C N C ~ T ~+ 'o ~ 3 a ~' - ' - ~ i 3 a i o o 0 0 o a J d _ ~ ~_ 1. m m o ~ ~ ~ ~ t° V Z r r Q) `o 0 m m a E-8 O) O W O O N Q W J U N LL I t9 0 a F- Z W W Q.' a Q H a U Z O a U U 0 2 U Z LL 0 U 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o in 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~n ++ O O M M N O ~[l O O O O tq ~ C O O N N c0 O C (p ~ O O N O N I~ n ~ er M (O M M ,1] N 00 a~- a M O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ QI I~ N O N N N O 0) (~O f~ ~ O F 0 , ~ O) ~ OD N N M N W OD a 0 0 0 O C O O O O O O O O O ~ j u d r ~ r ~- r r r -- O ` ~ O c- `. V ~ N ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ m o m v i u '~ ~ u 'i u5 u '~ M M M M M M M M M ~ M M M M M M ( 0 ( O O ( 0 ( O ~ ~ ~ f D N n .- ^ ~ .- r r r A ~ ~ .- .-- ~ .-. ^ r ~ N • m m m C C c c c ,? o N d N N d 0 : 0 . 0 : - N ~ O ~ O N N N N C O (p G) ~p d d Q N d f6 N O. O ` O_ O O. O N C f0 C l`- a ~ ~ a ~ ~ a a` a` ~ ~ ~ N ~ w0 C O C 4 C U •y ~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ - - ~ :-° d m m ~w m c a ~ m m o, o- E a _o co ~ m ~ c ~ '~ o d ~ ~ E c ~ c m ~° ~ c c ° c t w o ~0 ~ a~ >m aEi m - m m aNi U ~ U a > > L ~ o t > -o d ~ ~~ o ~ ' ' ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o W U U7 ~ o '- ~ N > J C m E c ~ c 0 a > E ¢ ~ m °. U ~ ~ ~v ~ > m c d m d Y >, m a o Lip U c in p d Y O c p v o o x d m ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ t c } ~ ~ o m L o ~ ~ o c o m - E v p o r _ fn ~ Q U 1. ~ C LL ~ LL N 3 m s ~, d E ~ ~ ~ to 0 LL? Y ~ in 2 o r c E E; N y N N d N ~ ~ d C C N ~ ~, Y ~. lO c U O > C O O .J I~ ~ C + O C C J O C C O O ~ c O N U a U Y U O U J U J U , U W m ~ Of ¢ N~ ~ d N.-. .~ Y~ ~v Y~ >v ~ W ~ N > c ¢~ o dm > ¢ ~v c ym m e am m e am m e m n ¢ c m ~~ > d> > d c c m c c > c m ~ . ~ ~ ¢ ~ o ¢ m • -o m rn ~ a i w Y m ~ . rn ' rn ~ rn m ~ c . c d d ~ N~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ O C H ~ U ~ U d U~ p O C ~ U N O N p d 2 J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ ?i U • C GD O) O N r N N N M N ~ [Y N l0 N t0 N I~ N Z E-9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 000 0 0 000 J 0 0 000 JJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ++ C 1{7 O~ to " O lfj N I~ O O to Ol lf1 O O O O O lLj O O ~ ~ ` N O O ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ I O O O h N O O ~ N • a 0~ ' ' 00 O O 00 O O~ 00 O O O ~ N rn V V 7 V C V 7 a V V ~f ~ f~ r O ~ N N ~ m ~ N N N m N N ~ N O O N N (O M ~- N C N N ~ M ~r O N N N O O M ~ O O D) ~ M M ~ l0 O 1 c t0 O O ~ to O O ~ an C fD (O (O (D N (O O O O O 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O V lCl LL7 117 ~ l!) In 47 47 l() Ln to In In 117 47 Il) ~ Q O l ) O O O O O O O O O N O O O (D O l In 1!J In LL7 l(7 1n 1l7 !l') In LL7 47 l!) In In LL7 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ~ O ~~ N m N N N~ N N ~ ~ ~ N~ N N C ~ ~ r r r .-- r .- r ~ ~ r e- O N a w J c a Q ~ ° om o 0 om o 0 or° V 0 . . . . .- 0 0 0 N 0 _ ~ c C a ~ _~p ~ c C a r ~ C C ~ C -cc-pp l0 ~ ~ r L r.4 .o 'C LL v ~ o: w 0 0 o:r v o 0 0~ o 0 0 ' c ~ F n 1// O n a , n a n a rn n n n 1 O (0 N a N N N O N N N O N N fq c 3 rn m c c c c a c c c n c c c ~ 7 ~ m o m m m o m m ~ o m m m LL W ~ t= a ~ ~ ~ a r i= F- a ~ r F- C7 O • a z ° W N 'C W ° L 0 U c N a C a ~ . , _ ~ m - N N a '00 O U pl H n ~ ~ ~ ~ c .N rn C a c H c o d rn Q m C 1` C c O c O~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ o (7 ~ m ~ ~ (~ , ~ ~ m .N .G m O ~ ¢ p m a ~ v ~ 1 N N C U ' V C t Q ~ 4? a s ~ o o` a c o m n t ~ n U' c Ev o ° m L o° ~ v_, c o y ~ ~ m m n o a F ~ ~ a v a ~ ~ ~ : o v c a: ~ ~ o ~ m ° $ °: ~ rn m : ~ ' m f . Q w - > rn a ~ c N n ~ ~ n~ c In O C~ N .U O) U 'U 3 C 'U N d C O 1` m ~ U N N C N ~ ~ O ~ (6 O 0 Z Z Q O) f0 a O) (0 t0 m ~ G W ~ ~ C y J l0 C ~ L OD l0 (0 .~. C -O >~ C~ ~~ (0 f ~ C l `C C C N~ (6 7 d C a ~ ~ C i ¢ H C f0 m O1 Z ~` N ~ y Q w K '(n m w 'O ~ i~ J c > N d .O V a '~0 a i a ~ c E m c ro Q Q °: ++ N ~ o > N c c y a~ ~ a E a v a o ~ ~ o c c o m m m ' ~ ~ ~ V = ~ c c ~ LL o ~ 3 0 m o ~ m E: >, D o i i v E E ~ ~ N ~ N M V 1{) O n CO ~ O U z ~ rn w 0 Ol l0 a E -10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 of o v o o ~n o ui ~ N LL7 ~ 7 N N N N N N N ~ Q O N • O O O O O O O O O O O O v v v c v v v v v v v v c N N N N N N ~ N N N N N N M N O N V ~ N O ~ N ~ ~ ~, I~ ~ ~ N N R N t~ eD ~ . C t0 r (O r t0 r (O (O cD O cD (O t0 (O ~ p O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ C7 l0 l0 ~ l0 10 M t0 ~ ~ In l!') 1n f' V (D (O tD [D (O (O (D (O (O t0 f0 f0 Q ~ L{') In In In LL7 LLJ In ~ Ll') In 47 M M M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O O O O ~ M M M M M M M M M M M M G 7 V sp V V V V V ~ V V V ` N N ~- N N ~ N •- N N N ~" N N N T., N ~ C ~ r r r r r r r r ~ r ~ O N ~ q W } J c c c c c c c~ c c c c c U o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ~ r r r r r ~ _ `~ `~ ~ r ~ _ `~ LL o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n o. n n o. a n n n n n n 9 Ul N N N N N N N N N Vl 41 ~ C C C C C G C C C C C C ~ N f`0 N N N 0 N (`0 N f0 f`0 I`0 LL H N H F F H H H F~ F- F I- O 01 a W rL m a W v > ~ O C a Y c U a J c ~ Q o o c F, c ° ~ c o ~'' a - ~ c o a U N !_ a m 3 o ~ ~ c •E o Y ~ a o ~ ~ C7 ~ >. m ~c c O a ~ Q ~a °: m rn N N ~ Z O ' - ~ c m u_, r E o m i a N C m o~ > _U > ~ L O1 O E ~ ~ ~ m J N a c 9 Q . ~~ a i o = ~ ~ ~ m F w m C.1 'ti ~ o d E LL m 2 F- m ¢ , m e a U E: ~ ~ Q ~0 _m ~ ~ ~ a > ~0 d m ~~ y a m~ a H U ~ U ~ m Q J ~ m O (0 N N C - L L = ti = LLL V ? > N L ~ ~ f=0 f0 t L p c~0 N O U) Q O (O Q Q CD U U U lL 2 U' f6 Q ' ^ Y C O N LL O ~ L C rn C rn C m C rn C rn. C m G m m C m ~ v O a ~ ~ in in in in i'n in in in in a '> ¢ ~ • V Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m r m rn o N N N E ~11 iiiiiiitlluilun ltllllllllllllllll ilTlllllllllllllll l It ~t~l l1. n 1 `' *`` TI I -----~ `. O utt lnu ,,,~,,. ~ ii ~ Tf'I 7GNd II ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~1 f illlllll N ~~ inimu N ^ ^ I • ~ x _ ~--~~nr l.- . ,~ ,~ t ~ 3nr Nrf{3YN~ 1 ..`.. .. M W Z Z W N O ~ ~ V ~~~~~~ yZ a ~ 0 ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ 0 W l7 ~\ ~ yv 1Sra ~ rr: ~~ rn °D ~ . . r to O ~' r ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ 'QnIH )133tl~ AYII t 'fMl~ » AYG O 3nr iGiS3C10tl iA ~ ~ N16S S~RNN N 2 r 0'IV dgj N ~~`{ 7 _ N ~~ ~c II N L~ ,~WNo ~7~p U~a~ haw ~~ I ii y ru ~i ~ .~ M n ~~_ ~ -~ 3nr q "~ ..._ . ~ ~ ~ - - ~ r• mil 2 ~~ ~ o~°z ~~~ U ~ U