HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995/03/01 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m.
March 1, 1995
Civic Center
Council Chambers
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
City Councilmembers
William J. Alexander, Mayor
Rex Gutierrez, Mayor Pro Tern
Paul Biane, Councilmember
James V. Curatalo, Councilmember
Diane Williams, Councilmember
Jack Lain, City Manager
James L. Markman, City Attorney
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk
City Office: 989-1851
City Council Agenda
March 1, 1995
PAGE
All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The
deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the
meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane , Curatalo ,
Gutierr~z , and Williams __
B. ANNOUNCFMFNTSIPRFSFNTATIONS
Presentation of Proclamation recognizing March 7, 1995 as Arbor Day.
Presentation of Proclamation to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department
recognizing them for their continued outstanding service to the community.
Presentation of Proclamation to the Rancho Cucamonga High School
Marching Cougars Band and Color Guard in recognition of their
achievements.
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council.
State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously
included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the
matter for a subsequent meeUng. Commente are to be limited to five minutes
per individual.
D. CONSFNT CAIFNDAR
The following Consent Calendar Items are expected to be routine and non-
controversial, They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without
discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the
audience for discussion,
Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 2/8/95 and 2/15/95; and Payroll ending
1126/95 for the total amount of $1,554,858.59.
Approval to appropriate $142,700.00 from Fund 22 -"Transportation
Development' for a reimbursement to Hix Development Corporation for
construction of street improvements for Tract 13930 on Wilson Avenue in
accordance with Resolution No. 90-077.
12
City Council Agenda
March 1, 1995
PAGE
o
,
,
Approval of purchase of land for Lemon Avenue Street right-of-way in the
amount of $2,000.00 funded from Proposition 111, Capital Outlay/Land
Account Number 10-4637-7042.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-021
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
DETERMINING A PUBLIC NEED, OBJECTING TO THE
SALE AT PUBLIC AUCTION, AND REQUESTING THE
PURCHASE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED
ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF LEMON AVENUE EAST
OF AMETHYST AVENUE, APPROVED FOR TAX SALE -
SALE NBR: 94-9999
Approval to record a "Notice of Special Tax Lien" for Community Facilities
Distdct No. 84-1 (Day Creek Channel) per the Amended Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Distdct Act of 1982.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-022
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF
SPECIAL TAX LIEN
Approval to vacate a portion of Ramona Avenue between Feron Boulevard
and the A.T. & S.F. Railroad and vadous drainage and utility easements as
related to the project in connection with Development Review 94-04 - APN:
209-085-20.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-023
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY
ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF
RAMONA AVENUE BETWEEN FERON BOULEVARD
AND THE A.T. & S.F. RAILROAD AND VARIOUS
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS (APN: 209-085-
20)
Approval of the Map and ordedng the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos.
I and 6 for Parcel Map 14635, located at the southeast comer of Foothill
Boulevard and Aspen Street ( APN: 208-352-09), submitted by Rancon
Realty Fund III, A California Limited Partnership.
16
18
19
20
24
26
54
City Council Agenda
March 1, 1995
PAGE
o
,
RESOLUTION NO. 95-024
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING
PARCEL MAP 14635
RESOLUTION NO. 95-025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING
THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1
AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 14635
Approval to execute Improvement Agreements, Improvement Securities and
Monumentation Cash Deposit for Tract 12462, located on the south side of
Summit Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues, submitted by Lauren
Development, Incorporated and release of Previously Submitted
Improvement Agreements, Improvement Securities and Monumentation
Cash Deposit accepted by City Council on November 15, 1989 from First
Family Homes.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-026
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
FOR TRACT 12462 AND RELEASING THE
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT
PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON
NOVEMBER 15, 1989
Approval to execute a Cooperative Agreement (CO 95-007) between the
City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Ontado for the maintenance of
Storm Drain Improvements on Archibald Avenue from Fourth Street to Deer
Creek Channel.
Approval to execute a Joint Powers Agreement (CO 95-008) to create a
Housing Finance Agency to exercise common powers of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, and the City of Chino, to finance home mortgages through the
issuance of Mortgage Revenue Bonds.
56
57
60
63
64
65
City Council Agenda
March 1, 1995
PAGE
10.
11.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-027
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
JOINT POVVERS AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CITY OF
CHINO FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING HOME
MORTGAGES AND PROVIDING FOR THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF A HOME MORTGAGE
FINANCING PROGRAM
Approval and execution of Program Supplement No. 007 (CO 95-009) to
Local Agency - State Master Agreement No. STLPP-5420 for the State-
Local Transportation Partnership Program between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the State of Califomia for the construction of Rochester
Avenue Street Improvements - between Highland Avenue and Banyan
Street and the Banyan Street Improvements - between Mount Baldy Race
and Rochester Avenue.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-028
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 007 TO LOCAL AGENCY
o STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. STLPP-5420 FOR
THE STATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP
PROGRAM FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
ROCHESTER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS -
BETVVEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND BANYAN STREET
AND THE BANYAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS
BETVVEEN MOUNT BALDY PLACE AND ROCHESTER
AVENUE
Approval and execution of Program Supplement No. 008 (CO 95-010) to
Local Agency - State Master Agreement No. STLPP-5420 for the State-
Local Transportation partnership program between the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the State of Califomia for the construction of the
Nineteenth Street Improvements - between Cameljan Street and Amethyst
Street.
66
67
69
71
City Council Agenda
March 1, 1995
PAGE
RESOLUTION NO. 95-029
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF
PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 008 TO LOCAL AGENCY
- STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. STLPP-5420 FOR
THE STATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATI ON PARTNERS HIP
PROGRAM FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
NINETEENTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS - BETWEEN
CARNELIAN STREET AND AMETHYST STREET
72
E. CONSFNT ORDINANCFS
The following Ordinance have had public hearings at the Ume of first reading.
Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will
be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk
will read the tiUe. Any item can be removed for discussion.
CONSIDFRATION OF FNVIRONMFNTAL ASSFSSMFNT AND
INDUSTRIAL ARFA SPFCIFIC PI AN AMFNDMFNT 94-04 - CUCAMONGA
COUNTY WATFR DISTRICT - A request to add Extensive Impact Utility
Facilities as a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 17 of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan.
ORDINANCE NO. 539 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN 94-04, TO ALLOW
EXTENSIVE IMPACT UTILITY FACILITIES AS A
CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED USE IN SUBAREA 17,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
74
F. ADVFRTISFD PUBIIC HFARINGS
The following item have been advertised and/or posted as public headngs as
required by law. The Chair will open the meeUng to receive public tesUmony.
CONSIDFRATION OF AN APPFAL OF MODIFICATION TO
CONDITIONAL USF PFRMIT 93-49 WFSTFRN DI=VFLOPMFNT
COMPANY - Appeal to a condition of approval imposed by the Planning
Commission in limiting one wall sign for Home Express, a tenant within the
Town Center Square commercial center, located on the north side of Foothill
Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues - APN: 1077-42-58 and 63.
77
City Council Agenda
March 1, 1995
PAGE
RESOLUTION NO. 95-029
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING
THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE CONDITION OF
APPROVAL IMPOSED BY THE PLANNING
COMMISSION IN LIMITING ONE WALL SIGN FOR HOME
EXPRESS, A TENANT WITHIN THE TOWN CENTER
SQUARE COMMERCIAL CENTER, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN
SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREFORE -APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63
101
G. PUBIIC HFa, RINGS
The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The
Chair will open the meeting to receive public teetimony.
No Items Submitted.
H. CITY MANAGFR'S STAFF RFPORTS
The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the
Chair may open the meeting for public input.
CONSIDFRATION TO APPROVF AN MOU (CO 95-O11) BFTWFFN THF
SOUTHFRN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVFRNMFNTS (SCAG)
AND THF CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RFGARDING
PARTICIPATION IN THF CLFAN CITIFS PROGRAM
104
I. COUNCIl RUSINFSS
The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion.
They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting
for public input.
1. UPDATE RFPORT ON ROUTF 30 (Continued from February 15, 1995)
CONSIDFRATION TO IMPLFMFNT THF GOVFRNMFNTAL PORTION OF
THF PFG ACCFSS CHANNFL
DISCUSSION OF FXPRFSSING CONTINUING SUPPORT FOR THF CITY
MANAGFR (Oral Report)
108
123
City Council Agenda
March 1, 1995
PAGE
DISCUSSION OF RFSIDENTIAL SPRINKLER ORDINANCE NO. 426
(Oral Report)
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITFMS FOR NFXT MEETING
This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at
the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only
identified for the next meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM TH;: PURl IC
This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council.
State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously
include on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the
matter for a subsequent meeUng. Commente are to be limited to five minutes
per individual.
I. ADJOURNMFNT
I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee,
hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on
February 23, 1995, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Govemment
Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Ddve.
i.
oe·
!1%l e · · eeeesseeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeelee, eesee · ewewe ·
I ·
oe · ·
~..
I ·
I ·
. .~-~
· I
I I
~ ~ *~ o
_1
(ZZZ~ZZ(~ZZZZZ
·
I
·
·
·
I
I
·
I
l
I
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
· ·
· ·
· I
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
IZI
Ik. EI
II--I
Ia-I
Ik41
I(,.,)1
i,.,-~1
· ·
I~rl
I ·
I ·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
· I
I ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
II ·
I ·
· ·
lull
t411
IZI
· ·
I ·
lOCI
IC21
ir'.jI
· ·
Z
~ Z ~ Z Z Z ~Z
Z~ZZZ~ZZZ~ Z ZUZ~ ~ZWZZZ~ZWZ~Z~ ZZZZZ~ZZ ZZ4~
z~z~z ZZZ~wZ~ZUZ)~Z~ZZZ~Z~Z~ZZZ~ZZZZwZZ~ZZ~
·
·
·
·
I
·
I
I
I
·
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
·
I
·
· ·
e.=. ·
.r. ·
I
· ·
'~ I
,v ·
~ ·
'.e ·
I
I
I
·
·
·
·
I
I
I
Z I
I
gl ·
.,,sl ·
· I
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
I
·
·
·
·
·
I
·
·
·
·
·
· ·
· I
I~,.I
I ·
i~-el
· ·
· I
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
I
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
I ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
Is.uI
1,41
· ·
· ·
I~1
· ·
~J
,','
J J
· ·
I ·
· I
· ·
· l
· I
· ·
· I
· ·
I ·
· ·
I
· ·
~ ·
· ·
· · I
I~1
~1~1
~1~1
NI ·
· ·
~1 ·
QI I
· ·
·
· ·
I~1
· ·
· ·
· ·
I
~ · ·
\ · I
~ · I
~ I I
~ ~ · ·
Z · I
~1 · I
~0 · ·
~1 I I
~N I ·
~0 I ·
~ ~ IZl
I~1
I~1
· I
I I
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
I ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I~1
!~1
· ·
· ·
I~1
IQI
· ·
ZZ ZZZ ZZ ZZZZZ
~ZZ~ZZZ~ZZ~g~ ZZZZZ
I
I
0
0
I I
I
I ·
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
I I
· ·
I ·
o, I ·
·
I~1
~1~1
~1~1
~141
· I
~1 I
~1 I
· ·
ZI I
~1 ·
~1 I
I~1
IZI
I ·
Ill
I]1
I I
· I
· ·
I ·
· I
· ·
I ·
I I
I ·
· ·
· ·
I I
I ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
I I
· ·
I I
I ·
IZl
I~1
I~1
Ill
I~1
I~1
· ·
I~1
I~1
·
I
I
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
I I
·
· ·
· I
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
I I
· I
I I
I I
· I
· I
· ·
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
IZI
I~1
I~1
I~1
· ·
Z~ZZ Z~Z
uJ
Z
0 )ZZ
7
I ·
I ·
I I
· I
· I
I ·
I ·
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
· ·
· e ·
I~1
~1~1
%1 ·
~1.1
~1~1
~1~1
0121
I I
--I ·
~l ·
~1 I
~1 I
I ·
Zl ·
·
· ·
I~1
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· I
· ·
I I
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
I I
· I
·
I ·
eoe
I ·
e~e
· I
I I
I I
· I
· ·
·
I ·
· ·
I ·
I I
· ·
· I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
I I
I I
· ·
· I
· I
· I
I I
· I
· I
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
II
e~l
·
v
~)~,J
I--(]~
· I
· I
I I
I l
· ·
I ·
I ·
· I
· I
~1 I
· I
· ·
· ·
· I
I
·
I I
I~1
~1~1
\1 ·
I
· o · ·
~1 I
41 I
~1 ·
· ·
II I
)1 I
~1 I
I;I
I~1
I(I
I)1
· I
· I
I I
· l
I I
· ·
I ·
I ·
I ·
I ·
I ·
I I
I I
I ·
I I
· ·
I ·
I ·
· ·
·
· ·
IZI
I;I
I~1
I~1
I~1
IuI
I~1
IGI
· I
I~1
I~1
I ·
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
·
I I
I ·
· ·
I ·
· I
· I
I I
· I
I ·
· ·
I I
· I
· ·
I I
· I
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
I ·
I ·
I I
· ·
· I
·
· I
I ·
i.~1
· ·
· I
i~,1
I ·
Ip'-e ~ w lie
%.
~4
Z
~,,,)QCl
T ·
~,~
~,
m
.Jmlm
m
~,~
_i
Z ~ ~
· ~
Z
(:2 v'~
41,,-I
(xrM
T.. ·
~_)
4C:2C:3
~L~'iLU
),,
i'--'
k4
· I
I I
I I
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
· I
I ·
~l ·
I ·
I ·
I ·
I ·
,, · ·
~l I
~l ·
41 ·
· I
I~1
~IEI
\1 ·
~1~1
%1~1
o,I ·
~1 I
~1 I
(I I
:1 I
· I
zl I
~1 I
~1 I
I~1
I~1
· I
· ·
· I
I ·
I ·
· I
I ·
I I
· ·
I I
· l
I ·
· I
· ·
I I
· ·
· I
I ·
· ·
I ·
· I
I~1
I~1
I~1
I~1
I~1
I~1
I~1
I~1
· ·
INI
· ·
· I
· I
· I
· I
· ·
I I
I ·
· I
· ·
·
· ·
I ·
· ·
I ·
· ·
I ·
I ·
I ·
I
I I
·
· l
I ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· I
I ·
I ·
· ·
I ·
I ·
IMJI
I I
· ·
//
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~Neil, City Engineer
Barrye R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer
APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $142,700.00 FROM FUND 22 -
"TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT" FOR A REIMBURSEMENT
TO HIX DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13930 ON WILSON
AVENUE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 90-077
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended the City Council approve an appropriation of $142,700.00 from
Fund 22 - "Transportation Development" for a reimbursement to Hix Development
Corporation in conjunction with its development of Tract 13930.
BACKGROUND/,& NAI .YSIS
As a condition of approval, Tract 13930 was required to construct Wilson Avenue
offsite from the traces east boundary to Amethyst Street. That portion of the street is
a Master Planned Transportation facility; therefore, its cost is eligible for
reimbursement from the Transportation Development Fee fund (formally the Systems
Fee fund). A resolution to that effect was approved by the City Council on February
21, 1990 (copy attached Exhibit A).
The work has been completed by the developer (Hix Development Corporation) and
accepted by the City. Also, the developer has submitted itemized cost information,
which has been reviewed and approved by City staff.
The total cost of the facility was $178,547. The developer has received a credit against
building permits of $35,911 leaving $142,636 left to be reimbursed from the City
Transportation Development fund.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
HIX DEVELOPMENT REIMBURSEMENT
March 1, 1995
Page 2
Because this amount could not have been anticipated at the time of the current year's
budget adoption, it is not included in the budget. Therefore, it is necessary for the City
Council to appropriate the funds necessary to make this reimbursement. This action
will not affect the funding of any project in the current budget.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O~Neil
City Engineer
WJO:BRH:dlw
Attachment: Resolution No. 90-077
RESOLUTION NO. g0-077
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO.
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SUPPLEMENT FOR THE
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IMPROVEMENT AGREE)lENT OF TRACT NO.
13930
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13930, consisting of 23 lots,
submitted by Winbrook Development, Inc., Subdivider, located on Wilson Avenue
between Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Street, has been submitted to the City of
Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and has been approved by said City as
provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in
compliance with the requirements of Ordinance rio. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the
Improvement Agreement Supplement submitted herewith for approval and execution
by said City.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby resolve as follows:
That said Improvement Agreement Supplement be and
the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to
execute same on behalf of said City and the City
Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and
That said Improvement Agreement Supplement i s
accepted as being an addendure to the previously
approved and executed agreement, dated November I,
1989, subject to approval of said Supplement as to
form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and
That System Development fees be used for reimburse-
ments of the off-site improvements for Wilson Avenue
between the easterly tract boundary and Amethyst
Street be and the same is approved, subject to
approval as to procedure, form and content thereof
by the City Attorney·
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21st day of February, 1990·
Alexander, Brovm, Buquet, Stout, Wright
AYES:
NO E S: No ne
ABSENT: None
Resolution No. 90-377
Page 2
ATTEST
d i
e J C ty C1 k
I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed,
approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of
February, 1990.
Executed this -'2nd day of February, 1990 at Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
f
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~eil, City Engineer
Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF LAND FOR LEMON AVENUE STREET RIGHT-OF-
WAY IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,000, FUNDED FROM PROPOSITION 111, CAPITAL
OUTLAY/LAND ACCOUNT NUMBER 10-4637-7042.
RECOMMRNDATION:
It is recommended City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the purchase of property for Lemon
Avenue street right-of-way.
BAC KGROUNB/A NA I ,YSIS
The City received notice from the County's Treasurer - Tax Collector of impending tax sale at public auction
of property located within Raacho Cucamongt Upon review of all the properties staff discovered one which
is necessary for street right-of-way. This property is APN 1062-561-03 and is located along the south side
of Lemon Avenue east of Amethyst Avenue. It is seven feet wide and 742 feet long. Please see Exhibit "A".
This portion of Lemon Avenue is fully constructed. The subdivision to the south installed Lemon Avenue
in 1987. However, this 7-foot strip of land, which is part of Lemon Avenue parkway, was never dedicated
as street right-of-way. This strip of !and was always a separate parcel from the subdivision to the south. A
separate street dedication should have occurred at the time of the subdivision, but it never did.
Acquiring this property through the tax sale will rectify the use of this land as street right-of-way.
Respectfully submitted,
Wi!lCm'd J. O~Ieil
City Engineer
WJO:diw
Attachments
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
gNG~G DIVLqION
N
i,
/7
RESOLUTION NO. q5' ~gG,~]
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING A PUBLIC NEED, OBJECTING
TO THE SALE AT PUBLIC AUCTION, AND REQUESTING THE
PURCHASE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG THE
SOUTH SIDE OF LEMON AVENUE EAST OF AMETHYST
AVENUE, APPROVED FOR TAX SALE - SALE NBR: 94-9999
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has been advised of the impending
tax sale at public auction of certain land, located in San Bemardino County, Sale NBR: 94-9999; and
WHEREAS, this property lies within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
taxes of the City are owed and delinquent on this property; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has a need to acquire property for municipal
needs:
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby determines that a public need exists for said land.
SECTION 2: That the City Council does hereby object to the tax sale of said property at
public auction.
SF. CTION 3: That the City Council does hereby request that the City of Rancho Cucamonga
be allowed to purchase the following property as provided for in Chapter 8 of Part 6 of Division 1
of the California Revenue and Taxation Code.
APN: 1062-561-03
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Robert Dominguez, Administrative Services Director
Ingrid Y. Blair, GIS/Special Districts Supervisor
APPROVAL TO RECORD A PUBLIC NOTICE FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM) PER THE AMENDED
MELLO ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT ACT OF 1982.
'\
Recommendation
It is recommended that City Council approve the recording of a Public Notice for Community Facilities
District No. 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage System) per the amended Me!lo Roos Community Facilities
District Act of 1982.
Background/Analysis
When Community Facilities District 84-1 (Day Creek Drainage) was formed, the Mello Roos Community
Facilities Act of 1982 required that a q',totice of Special Tax Authorization' be recorded. Said Notice was
recorded on March 24, 1987. As a result of concerns raised by the title industry, the Act was mended,
to delete the requirement for recordation of a ?qotice of Special Tax Authorization' and to provide for the
recordation of a 'Notice of Special Tax Lien' effective January 1, 1989.
As a result of a court decision in the City of Oxnard regarding the issue of whether the ~Notice of Special
Tax Authorization' created a lien on properties within a community facilities district, it is recommended
that a 'Notice of Special Tax Lien' for Community Facilities District No. 84-1 be recorded.
Respectfully submitted,
Administrative Services Director
RCD:IYB:de
RESOLUTION NO. 95- C) <:~ ,~-,.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING RECORDATION OF
NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN PERTAINING TO AN EXISTING SPECIAL
TAX
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred
to as the "legislative body of the local Agency") has previously formed a community facilities
district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of
1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, title 5 of the Government Code of the State of
California (the "Act"), said community facilities district known and designated as
COMMLrNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1 (the "District"); and,
WHEREAS, at the time the District was formed, the City did record a Notice of
Special Tax Authorization as required by the provisions of the Act at that time; and,
WHEREAS, the Act was subsequently amended to permit the City to record a Notice
of Special Tax Lien in addition to the Notice of Special Tax Authorization; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to authorize the recordation of a Notice of
Special Tax Lien.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
resolve as follows:
SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. The City Council does hereby authorize the recordation of a Notice of
Special Lien for Community Facilitites District No. 84-1 pursuant to the provisions of the Act.
1995.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
day of
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P. O. BOX 807
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code and Section 53328.3
of the Government Code, the undersigned CITY CLERK of the legislative body of the CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, HEREBY GIVES NOTICE that a lien was imposed on March 24, 1987, to secure payment
of special tax which the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State
of California, is authorized to annually levy for the following purpose:
To pay for certain public capital facilities, including the payment of principal and interest
on bonds, said facilities generally described as the construction and installation of certain
public capital drainage facilities, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work, to
serve and provide drainage protection to properties within the boundaries of Community
Facilities District No. 84- !.
The special tax is authorized to be levied within Community Facilities District No. 84-1, which was
officially formed in 1987, and the lien of the special tax is a continuing lien which shall secure each annual
levy of the special tax and which shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is
prepaid, permanently satisfied and cancelled in accordance with law or until the special tax ceases to be
levied and a notice of cessation of special tax is recorded in accordance with Section 53330.5 of the
Government Code.
The rate and method of apportionment of the authorized special tax is as shown on the attached, referenced
and incorporated Exhibit "A", and the special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad
valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure,
sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorera taxes. Conditions under which
the obligation to pay the special tax may be prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien of the special
tax cancelled may be established by resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
Notice is further given that upon the recording of this notice in the Office of the County Recorder, the
obligation to pay the special tax levy shall become a lien upon all non-exempt real property within the
district in accordance with Section 3115.5 of the Streets and Highways Code.
The (a) names of the owner(s) of the real property included within this Community Facilities District as
they appear on the last secured assessment roll as of the date of recording of this Notice and (b) the
Assessor's tax parcel(s) numbers of all parcels or any portion thereof which are included within this
Community Facilities District are as set forth on the attached. referenced and incorporated Exhibit "B".
Reference is made to the boundary map of the Community Facilities District recorded at Book
Page , Document No. , of Maps of Assessment and Community
Facilities Districts in the Office of the County Recorder for the County of Sa~Bemardino, State of
California, which map is now the final boundary map of the Community Facilities District.
For further information concerning the current and estimated future tax liability of owners or purchasers
of real property subject to this special tax lien, interested persons should contact the following designated
person:
Ingrid Y. Blair, GIS/Special District Supervisor
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
P. O. BOX 807
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730
TELEPHONE: (909)989-1851, EXT. 2567
DATED:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 84-1
(DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Debra J. Adams, under penalty of perjury, CERTIFIES AS FOLLOWS:
The undersigned is now, and at all times mentioned herein was, the duly appointed, qualified and acting
CITY CLERK of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, and as such, accomplished
the notice requirements in connection with the referenced Community Facilities District, as noted:
RECORDING
A copy of the proposed BOUNDARY MAP was filed in the Office of the County Recorder, said filing
being accomplished on the first day of February, 1984.
A copy of the NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, said
recording being accomplished on the day of ,1995.
EXECUTED this day of , 1995, at Rancho Cucamonga,
California.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. 05/ell, City Engineer
Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer
VACATION OF A PORTION OF RAMONA AVENUE BETWEEN FERON
BOULEVARD AND THE A.T. & S.F. RAILROAD AND VARIOUS
DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AS RELATED TO THE
PROJECT IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-04 -
APN: 209-085-20
RF, COMMF, NDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the summary
vacation of a portion of Ramona Avenue and the various drainage and utility easements as
shown and described in Exhibits "A", "B" and "C" attached hereto.
BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS:
On May 25, 1994, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 9440, which approved
Development Review No. 94-04, for the development of low income affordable housing on
8.56 acres of land in the low-medium residential district, located on the south side of Feron
Boulevard, west of Old Town Park~
As a condition of approval, the project was required to vacate the unused portion of Ramona
Avenue from the A.T. & S.F. railroad to Feron Boulevard. Additionally, several public
drainage and utility easements, which currently occupy the site, need to be vacated as well (see
Exhibits "A","B" and "C" attached).
On August 10, 1994, the Planning Commission determined the vacations conform to the
General Plan and recommended the vacations occur.
Section 8331 of the Streets and Highways Code states local agencies may stnnmarily vacate
COy resolution) a street or highway that has been impassable for vehicular travel for a period
of five consecutive years or more and no public money was expended for maintenance. In
addition, Section 8333, of same code, states local agencies may summarily vacate Coy
resolution) a public service easement if the easement has not been used for the purpose for
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
RAMONA VACATION
March 1, 1995
Page 2
which it was dedicated or acquired for five consecutive years or said easement has been
superseded by relocation and there are no other public facilities located within the easement.
Easements will be reserved for any or all existing utilities lying with the above mentioned
vacations, as so directed by the affected utility companies.
Respectfully submitted,
William J. O~Neil
City Engineer
WJO:JAD:dlw
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY
ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF RAMONA
AVENUE BETWEEN FERON BOULEVARD AND THE A.T.&
S.F. RAILROAD AND VAR/OUS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENTS (APN: 209-085-20)
WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8331, of the Streets and Highway Code, the
City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate a portion of Ramona Avenue, herein
more particularly described; and
WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 8333, of the Slxeets and Highway Code, the
City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate the various drainage and utility
easements, herein more particularly described; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found from all the evidence submitted that the portion of
Ramona Avenue is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, it has not been
used for more than five (5) consecutive years, and no public money was expended for maintenance
of same; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found from all the evidence submitted that the various drainage
and utility easements have not been used for the purpose for which dedicated or acquired for five
consecutive years or said easement has been superseded by relocation and there are no other public
facilities located within the easements.
NOW TttEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI-IE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby makes its order vacating the portion of Ramona
Avenue, and the various drainage and utility easements, as shown on map V-130, labeled
Exhibit"A", on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga which are
further described in legal descriptions attached hereto, labeled Exhibit "B" and "C", and by this
reference made a part hereof.
SECTION 2: That the subject vacations shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions,
if any, for any or all existing utilities on record, as directed by the affected utility companies.
SECTION 3: That from and a_~.er the date the resolution is recorded, said portion of Ramona
Avenue no longer constitutes a public street or easement.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
RAMONA VACATION
March l, 1995
Page 2
SF. CTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be
recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bemardino, California.
SF. CTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution,
and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force.
VICINITY MAP
L
I I
APN
..ta,'l Ja~
A .V. 'C ~-
alllllll mimic
Lii.T,s
CITY OIr RAN~HO CUCAMONO~;
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD4NO
STATE O¥ CALIFORNIA
N
~;rX'f 0F
EANC~IO G~JCAMONGA
rr~M: v - 1~
TITLe: Dl~94-e4
VACATION
irXIHBIT: A-I
I I
IfWlIIUTI. ffYIIIIIfFII
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
rrf,,,11: v- 136
TITLe: DR94.44 DRAINAGE
i,rr!Lr!'Y VACA'I'I{]q'q
EXHIBIT: A-2
EXHIBIT "B 1w
Legal Description for
The Vacation of Ramona Avenue
That portion of Ramona Avenue adjoining Lot 1, of Block 7 in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of
California recorded in Book 13 of Maps, Pages 1 and 2 in the
office of the Recorder of said County, more particularly
described as follows:
The westerly 32.00 feet of Ramona Avenue bound on the north by
the easterly projection of the northerly line of said Lot 1, and
bound on the south by the easterly projection of the southerly
line of said Lot 1.
All as shown on Exhibit "C
reference made a part hereof.
1" attached hereto and by this
FERON
EXHIBIT
'1-
#IC
BOULEVARD
-------NO~THERLY LIN~~/~/32.~/
LOTS I-3
NORTHJAST CORNER
LOT I -
/
Ld
EASTERLY LINE LOT I
SOUTHEAgT CORNER LOT I -
'--SOUTHERLY LII
LOTS I-3
I
Z
32'
32'
33'
LLEY VACATED PER O.R. 91-156563
REC'O, MAY 8, 199l, REg. 91-112.
MAP TO ACCOMPANY
'q :[~:I l!'] ::(-'1"] ;,1 1 ~
EXHIBIT "B 2e
Legal Description for
The Vacation of Ramona Avenue
That portion of Ramona Avenue adjoining Lot 48 of Block 7 of the
Rap of the Town of West Cucamonga, in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
recorded in Book 13 of Raps, Pages 1 and 2 in the office of the
Recorder of said County, mere particularly described as follows:
The westerly 19.00 feet of Ramena Avenue bound on the north by
the easterly prolongation of the northerly line of said Lot 48,
and bound on the south by the easterly prolongation of the
southerly line of said Lot 48, excepting therefrom those portions
described as follows~
PARCEL A
BEGINNING at the southeast corner of said Lot 48= THENCE S 89
degrees 49 minutes 55 seconds E along the easterly prolongation
of the southerly line of said Lot 48 a distance of 3.97 feet to a
point on a non-tangent curve concave southeasterly having a
radius of 45.00 feet, said point being the TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, a radial through said point bears N 38 degrees 46
minutes 28 seconds W, the radius point of said curve being the
centerline intersect of Ramena Avenue and Nain Street= THENCE
northeasterly along said curve through a central angle of 14
degrees 56 minutes 59 seconds an arc length of 11.74 feet to a
point on a non-tangent line a radial through said point bears N
23 degrees 49 minutes 28 seconds W= THENCE N O0 degrees 14
minutes 47 seconds W along said line a distance of 4.33 feet to
a point on a non-tangent curve concave southeasterly having a
radius of 49.00 feet a radial through said point bears N 21
degrees 47 minutes 54 seconds R the radius point of said curve
being the centerline intersect of Ramaria Avenue and Nain Streetl
THENCE easterly along said curve through a central angle of 06
degrees 10 minutes 01 seconds an arc length of 5.27 feet to a
point on a non-tangent line, a radial through said point bears N
15 degrees 37 minutes 54 seconds W said line being a line
parallel with and 13.00 feet westerly of, measured at right
angles, to the centerline of Ramona Avenue~ THENCE S O0 degrees
14 minutes 47 seconds E along said centerline a distance of 12.15
feet to the easterly projection of the southerly line of said Lot
48~ THENCE N 89 degrees 49 minutes 55 seconds W along said line a
distance of 15.03 feet to the THEIR POINT OF BEGINNING.
Also excepting therefrom the following:
PARCEL B
BEGINNING at the northeast corner of said Lot 48~ THENCE easterly
along the easterly prolongation of the northerly line of said Lot
48 a distance of 19.00 feet to a point of intersection with a
line parallel with and 13.00 feet westerly, measured at right
angles, to the centerline of Ramona Avenue~ THENCE southerly
along said parallel line a distance of 19.00 feet~ THENCE
northwesterly a distance of 26.87 feet sore or less to the POINT
OF BEGINNING.
All as shown on Exhibit 'C
reference made a part hereof.
2~
attached hereto and by this
EXHIBIT
CORNER (2E). , ·
' I ~/ ~ ,~.,5'
15.03'
u~r, ti,lfw
_ ' STREET
MAIN ~- ..ss',~s'ss'w.
Z
0
3l' I ' 11'
b
LOT 4
P,M. 5955
BOOK 74/20
DATA SCHEDULE
1 S89'49'55"E 397'
2 R=45.00' A,,14'56'59"
L=11.74' T=5.90'
3 NOO'I4'47"W 4.33'
4 R=49.00' A=6'lO'Or'
L=5.27' T-2.64'
LOT 3
P.M. 5955
BOOK 74/20
MAP TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPT ION
rXHIBIT wB 3'
Legal Description for
The Vacation of Ramona Avenue
That portion of Ramona Avenue adjoining ~ot 1 of Block 10 in the
City of Rancho Cucamon~a, County of San Bernardino, State of
California, recorded in Book 13, Pages 1 and 2 in the office of
the Recorder of said County, more particularly described as
follows:
The westerly 32.00 feet of Ramohm Avenue bound on the north by
the easterly projection of the northerly line of said Lot 1 and
on the south by the easterly projection of the southerly line of
said Line 1, excepting the following therefrom:
BEGINNING at the northeast comer of said Lot 1; THENCE easterly
along the easterly projection of the northerly line of said Lot
a distance of 3.46 feet to TH~ TRU~ POINT OF B~GINNING=
continues on said easterly projection a distance of 28.54 feet to
the centerline of Ramone Avenue~ THENCg southerly along said
centerline S O0 degrees 14 minutes 47 seconds B a distance of
10. O0 feet to a point on a non-tangent curve concave
northeasterly having a radius of 45.00 feet said centerline being
a radial to said curve, the radius point being the centerline
intersect of Ramohm Avenue and Main Street~ THENCE northwesterly
along said curve through a central angle of 39 de~rees 21 minutes
25 seconds an arc length of 30.91 feet to the THUg POINT OF
BEGINNI!~.
All as shown on rxhibit wC
reference made a part hereof.
3w attached
10-28-96.
MAP TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
MAIN
N. 99' 749' 55" W.
NORTHERLY LINE LOT I
gXHIRIT
STREET
W
~.
t,L,I ,
..4/q:
NORTHEfT CORN! R LOT IS89,49.55. E 28.54'
w S00'14'47"E
10.00'
_ _ 33:
,j
\//))
I-
Q
I
gOUTHEAgT CORNER LOT I 3
SANTA FE
DATA SCHEDULE
I R,45.00'/%-39'21'25"
L-30.91' T=16.09'
2 S89'49'55"E 3.4G'
RAILROAD
R/W
EXHIBIT eB 4N
Legal Description for
The Vacation of Ramona Avenue
Those portions of Ramona Avenue adjoining Lot 24, Block 6 of the
Nap of the Town of West Cucamonqa, in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California recorded
in Book 13 of Naps, Pages 1 and 2 in the office of the Recorder
of said County, more particularly described as follows:
The easterly 32.00 feet of Ramona Avenue bound on the north by
the westerly projection of the northerly line of said Lot 24 and
bound on the south by the westerly projection of the southerly
line of said Lot 24, and that portion described as follows=
BEGINNING at the southwest corner of said Lot 24: THENCE
southerly along the southerly projection of the westerly.
line of said Lot 24 a distance of 10.00 feet to a point on a
line parallel with and 10.00 feet south measured at right
angles of the southerly line of said Lot 24~ THENCE westerly
along said line a distance of 19.00 feet to a point on a
line parallel with and 13.00 feet easterly, measured at
right angles to the centerline of Ramona Avenue: THENCE
northerly along said line a distance of 10.00 feet to the
westerly projection of the southerly line of said Lot 24:
THENCE easterly along said line a distance of 19.00 feet to
the POINT OF BEGINNING.
All as shown on Exhibit
reference made a part hereof.
4w attached
hereto and by this
EXH I B I T "C ,~ "
FERON
T
BOULE%4-ARD
r',~o'
b
MAP TO ACCOMPANY
i'm :.[~f-.1 ll.] :.[..-'~,.,] ;] I ~
32'
32'
32'
NORTHERLY LINE
LOTS 21-24
I
NORTHWEST CORNER LOT 24
W
;Z
W
WESTERLY LINE .OT 24
~,HWEST CORNER LOT 24 i SOUTHERLY LINE
LOTS 21-24
ALLEY VACATED PER
o~. 91-1565~3 REC'D.
E3gtlBIT wB 5w
Legal Description for
The Vacation of Ramone Avenue
That portion of Ramona Avenue adjoining Lot 4 of Tract No. 5955
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State
of California, recorded in Book 74 of Maps, Page 20 in the office
of the Recorder of said County, more particularly described as
follows:
BEGINNING at the northwest corner of said Lot 4 said corner being
33.00 easterly of the centerline of Ramona Avenue~ THENCE N 00
degrees 14 minutes 47 seconds W to a point along the northerly
prolongation of the westerly line of said Lot 4 a distance of
10.00 feet~ THENCE N 89 degrees 50 minutes 02 seconds W along a
line a distance of 20.00 feet to a point on a parallel line 13.00
feet east of, measured at right angles with the centerline of
Ramona Avenue~ THENCE S O0 degrees 14 minutes 47 seconds E along
said line a distance of 157.76 feet to a point on a non-tangent
curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 49.00 feet, a
radial through said point bears N 15 degrees 08 minutes 20
seconds E the radial point of said curve being the centerline
intercept of Ramone Avenue and Main Street~ THENCE easterly along
said curve through a central angle of 6 degrees 10 minutes 01
seconds an arc length of 5.27 feet to a point on a non-tangent
line, a radial through said point bears N 21 degrees 18 minutes
21 seconds E~ THENCE S 00 degrees 14 minutes 47 seconds E along
said line a distance of 4.33 feet to a point on a non-tangent
curve concave southwesterly having a radius of 45.00 feet, a
radial through said point bears N 23 degrees 19 minutes 54
seconds E the radial point of said curve being the centerline
intercept of Ramone Avenue and Main Street~ THENCE southeasterly
along said curve through a central angle of 23 degrees 35 minutes
18 seconds an arc length of 18.53 feet to a point on the
southerly prolongation of the westerly line of said Lot 4 a
radial to said point bears N 46 degrees 55 minutes 13 seconds E;
THENCE N O0 degrees 14 minutes 47 seconds W along the westerly
line a distance of 4.17 feet to the southwesterly comer of said
Lot 4~ THENCE N 00 degrees 14 minutes 47 seconds W along the
westerly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 160.10 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING.
All as shown on Exhibit sc 5s aZ~~~t~ and by this
reference made a part hereof.
_ . ,,,'
EXHIBIT "C 5"
I _ ~'
i> ~4J ~~.89'50'02"w. 2O.OO'
~ NORTHERLY ~INE LOT 4
,33' _ NORTH ES CORNER LOT 4
/ p.Oj.w T
32'
_~'~ WESTERLY LINE LOT 4
LOT 4
P.M. 5955
BOOK 74/20
DATA SCHEDULE
R=45.00 A,23'35'!8"
L-18.53'. r, 9.40'
2 SOO'I4'47"E 4.33'
3 R-49.00' A-6'lO'Or'
L-5.27' T- 2.64'
T R
SOU HWEST CORNE LOT 4
/SOUTHERLY LINE LOT 4
~ NORTHERLY LINE LOT 3
N. 89' 49' 9,5' W.
NOO'I4'47'W 4.17'
WEgTERLY LINE LOT 3
Z
33'
LOT 3
P.M, ~i955
BOOK 74/20
MAP TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT "B 6"
Legal Description for
The Vacation of Ramona Avenue
That portion of Ramona Avenue adjoining Lot 3 of Tract Map No.
5955 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino,
State of California, recorded in Book 74 of Naps, Page 20 in the
office of the Recorder of said County, more particularly
described as follows:
BEGINNING at the southwest corner of said Lot 3~ THENCE N 00
degrees 14 minutes 47 seconds W along the westerly line of said
Lot 3 a distance of 174.61 feet to a point of CUSP with a curve
concave northwesterly having a radius of 45.00 feet, a radial
through said point bears S 47 degrees 24 minutes 47 seconds E the
radial point of said curve being the centerline intersect of
Ramona Avenue and Main Street ~ THENCE southwesterly along said
curve through a central angle of 47 degrees 10 minutes 00 seconds
an arc length of 37.04 feet to a point on the centerline of
Ramohm Avenue~ THENCE S O0 degrees 14 minutes 47 seconds E along
said line a distance of 159.97 feet to a point on the westerly
projection of the southerly line of said Lot 3~ THENCE S 89
degrees 50 minutes O0 seconds E along said line a distance of
33.0 feet to TME POINT OF B~GINNING.
All as shown on Exhibit "C
reference made a part hereof.
attached hereto and by this
MAP TO ACCOMPANY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT
W
:::)'
Z
W
>
MAIN '
N. 89' 4~' 55' W.
STREET
Z
DATA SCHEDULE
I R,45,00' A, 47'10'00"
L,37.04' T-1964'
2 S89'50'00"E 33.00'
WEST LINE LOT 3
SANTA FE
32' ' ~1 LOT 3
~ RAILROA_D /~ R/W
80' 00" W. (7/__.~
EXHIBIT "B 7"
Legal Description
For
The Vacation Of A Drainage And Incidental Purpose Easement
That portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 10208 in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, County of San Bernardino,
recorded on Book 120 of Parcel Maps, Pages 59 and 60, in the
office of the Recorder of said County, more particularly
described as follows:
Parcel "A"
A 30.00 foot wide strip of land, the centerline described as
follows:
BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said Parcel 2~ THENCE N
89 degrees 49 minutes 56 seconds W along the Northerly line
of said Parcel 2 a distance of 71.43 feet to the TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING~ THENCE S 00 degrees 14 minutes 41 seconds E a
distance of 160,15 feet.
The sidelines of Parcel "A" shall be extended or shortened
to begin on the Northerly line of said Parcel 2 and
terminate on a line through the terminus of described
centerline and at right angles thereto.
All as shown on Exhibit "C
reference made a part hereof.
7" attached hereto and by this
>-Z
ZO
~E -- 3i'IN3AV
On,,,
CJ CJ ~¢SOfi~3H
I
EXHIBIT NB 8N
Legal Description
For
The Vacation Of A Drainage Easement
(Book 4713, Page 584 Official Records)
That portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 10208 in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, state of California,
recorded in Book 120 of Parcel Maps, Pages 59 and 60, records of
the County Recorder of said County, more particularly described
as follows:
A strip of land 30.00 feet wide lying 15.00 feet,
measured at right angles, on each side of the following
described line~
Beginning at the point of intersection of the Northerly
line of Lot 3 with the center line of Armitage Avenue, as
said point is shown on Map of Tract No. 5955, as recorded in
Book 74 of Maps, Page 20, records of said County.
THENCE Southerly along the Southerly prolongation of
the centerline of said Armitage Avenue to the Southerly line
of said Lot 3.
Said 30.00 foot strip shall terminate on the North at
the Northerly line of said Lot 3 and shall terminate on the
South at the Southerly line of said Lot 3.
All as shown on Exhibit wC
reference made a part hereof.
attached
hereto and by this
'3AV V$Olft~3H
>o.~ ~
· ~NN~tAV VNO;fVH
I
Legal Description
For
The Vacation of A Public Drainage Easement
(Book 4724 Page 450 Official Records)
That portion of Lot 1, Tract 5955 in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, County of San eernardino, State of California,
recorded in Book 74 of Maps, Page 20 in the office of the
Recorder of said County, more particularly described as follows:
BMGINMINC at a point on the South line of Feron Boulevard,
distant 128.00 feet Easterly from the Northwest corner of
Lot 1, Tract 5955; THENCE Southerly along a line parallel
with the West line of said Lot I a distance of 160.00 feet,
more or less, to the South line of said Lot 1; THENCE
Easterly along the South line of said Lot 1, a distance of
372.00 feet, more or less, to a point on the West line of
Armitage Avenue which point is also the Southeast corner of
said Lot 1; THENCE Northerly along the West line of Armitage
Avenue a distance of 10.00 feet; THENCE Westerly along a
line parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the
beginning of a tangent curve which has a radius of 100.00
feet and is concave to the Northeast; MCE along said
curve to the end of curve, the tangent of which is parallel
to and distant 158.00 feet Easterly from the West line of
Lot 1, Tract 5955; THENCE Northerly along a line parallel to
the West line of said Lot I to the south line of Feron
Boulevard; THENCE Westerly 30.00 feet along the South line
of Feron Boulevard to the POINT OF BE(IINNIN~.
All as shown on Exhibit
reference made a part hereof.
attached hereto and by this
3~N3AV VSO~H
EXHIBIT eB l0w
Legal Description
For
The Vacation Of A Public Drainage Easement
(Book 4724, Page 448 Official Records)
That portion of Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 10208 in the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California,
recorded in Book 120 of Parcel Maps, Pages 59 and 60 in the
office of the Recorder of said County more particularly described
as follows:
The Southerly 30.00 feet of Parcel 2.
All as shown on Exhibit "C
reference made a part hereof.
attached hereto and by this
,'
EXHIBIT wB 11m'
Legal Description
For
The vacation of Right-of-way and Easements
For
Existing Public Utility Easements
Those portions of Armitage Avenue and Main Street as shown on the
Map of the Town of West Cucamonga, recorded in Book 13 of Maps,
Pages 1 and 2 in the office of the San Bernardino County
Recorder, lying within Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 10208 recorded in
Book 120, Pages 59 and 60 of Parcel Maps, records of the office
of the San Bernardino County Recorder, reserved by Resolution of
the Board of Supervisors of said County, recorded January 23,
1959, in Book 4712, Pages 299 and 300 of Official Records.
All as shown on Exhibit "C
reference made a part hereof.
11" attached
hereto and by this
'3AV VSO~a3H
~ '13~tltvcl 3NI'I A'I~I3~SV3//
VNOtT~[
x
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~leil, City Engineer
Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL OF THE MAP AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 14635, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ASPEN STREET (APN 208-352-09),
SUBMITTED BY RANCON REALTY FUND III, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
RF, COMMENDATION :
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 14635 and
ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District
Nos. I and 6, and authorizing the City Clerk to attest and the City Engineer to present the Parcel Map to the
County Recorder to be filed for record.
BAC KGROLrND/A NA I ,YSIS
Parcel Map 14635, located at the southeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Aspen Street in the Industrial
Park District (subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission
on June 22, 1994, for a subdivision of 7.4 acres of land into 2 parcels.
An improvement certificate has been placed upon the Map stating that certain off-site improvements are
required upon the development of the p/~cels, in accordance with the conditions of approval. The proper
securities and agreements to guanmtee the construction of the off-site improvements will be required at that
time.
Copy of the Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is available in the City Clerk's
office.
Respectfully submitted,
Will~O~e~~ild''~
City Engineer
WJO:JAD:dlw
Attachments
VICINITY MAP '
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
COUNTY Olle SAN BIRNARDINO
STATE OIIr CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION NO. q .5 ' (9¢:,~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVFNG
PARCEL MAP 14635
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map 14635, submitted by Rancon Realty Fund III, consisting
of a subdivision of 7.4 acres of land into 2 parcels, located at the southeast comer of Foothill
Boulevard and Aspen Su'eet in the Industrial Park District (subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan (APN 208-352-09), was approved by the Planning Commission on June 22, 1994.
WHEREAS, Parcel Map 14635 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown
on said Tentative Parcel Map; and
WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map by
the City Council of said City have been met by Rancon Realty Fund III, a California Limited
Partnership as Developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Parcel Map 14635 is hereby
approved and authorize the City Clerk to attest and the City Engineer to present same to the County
Recorder to be filed for record.
v sot, 0 5'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP
14635
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously
formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No.3B, Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereina~er
referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the
property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, all of the ownen of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the
Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation
without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, Tt~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION ?: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as
shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program axeas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the
Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of
all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder.
EXHIBIT 'A'
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.38
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N()~S. 1 AND 6
H~5.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA PM 14635
STREET LIGHTS:*
Dist.
S1
S6
5800L
9500L
EXHIBIT 'B"
WORK PROGRAM
PROJECT: PARCEL MAP 14635
NUMBER OF LAMPS
16,000L 22,000L
27,500L
LANDSCAPING:*
Dist.
Con~nuni ty
Equest.
Trail
D .G .S .F.
L3B
Turf
S.F.
Non-Turf Trees
S .F. Ea.
Division of the Land
at this time. Improve-
ments shall be required
upon the development of
Parcel s 1 and 2.
ASSESSMENT UNITS:
DU or
Parcel Acres S1
1 i .43 2.86
2 5.95 11 .gO
Assessment Units
By District
S6 L3B
1.43 1.43
5.95 5.95
Form Date 2/18/93
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~eil, City Engineer
Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer
APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT
12462, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SUMMIT AVENUE
BETWEEN ETIWANDA AND EAST AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY
LAUREN DEVELOPMENT, INC. AND RELEASE OF PREVIOUSLY
SUBMITtED IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT
SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT ACCEPTED BY
CITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 15, 1989 FROM FIRST FAMILY
HOMES
RF~COMMF, NDATION:
It is recommended that the City Council.adopt the attached resolution (1) accepting the new
Improvement Agreements, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit, (2)
releasing the previous Improvement Agreements, Securities and authorizing the Finance
Department to refund the previous Monumentation Cash Deposit, and (3) authorizing the
Mayor and the City Clerk to sign and release said agreements.
BACKGROUNB/ANAI ,Y~I~
The original Improvement Agreements, Improvement Securities, Tract Map and the
Monumentation Cash Deposit were approved by the City Council in 1989. The Developer at
the time was First Family Homes.
The property has been purchased by Lauren Development, Inc., who has submitted new
agreements and securities to guarantee the completion of the off-site public improvements in
the following amounts:
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
TRACT 12462
March 1, 1995
Page 2
Faithful
Performance Bond
Labor and
Material Bond
Off-site Improvements
Community Trail
Detention Basin
Monumentation Cash Deposit
$67,000.00 $33,500.00
$14,000.00 $ 7,000.00
$11,600.00 $ 5,800.00
$ 3,750.00
The above-mentioned securities replace the securities submitted by the previous Developer.
By processing these agreements, Lauren Development, Inc., as the new Developer, has
responsibility for the project.
Copies of the agreements and securities are available in the City clerk's office.
Respectfully submitted,
W~~,,~ C_C
City Engineer
WJO:WV:dlw
Attachments
T~ 124~2
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
~qelNgsmnqe DIVI~ON
TeA C T/~ 4 6~
RESOLUTION NO. q._5 ' (5) c9" ~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES
AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 12462
AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH
DEPOSIT PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON
NOVEMBER 15, 1989
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, did consider
the Improvement Agreements, related Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit
submitted by Lauren Development, Inc., as Developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way
adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side
of Summit Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues and release of the previously approved
Improvement Agreements, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit from First
Family Homes.
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreements are secured and accompanied by good and
sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreements.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that (1) said Improvement Agreements,
Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by Lauren Development Inc.,
are hereby approved, (2) the previously approved Improvement Agreements, Improvement Securities
and Monumentation Cash Deposit from First Family Homes are released and (3) the Mayor is hereby
authorized to sign said Improvement Agreements on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and
the City Clerk to attest thereto.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O'Neil, City Engineer
Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer
APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CITY OF ONTAILIO FOR THE
MAINTENANCE OF STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS ON ARCHIBALD AVENUE
FROM FOURTH STREET TO DEER CREEK CHANNEL
RRCOMMF. N'BATION:
Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and
the City of Ontario for the maintenance of storm drain improvements on Archibald Avenue from
Fourth Street to Deer Creek Channel.
BACKGROUND/ANAl .YSIS
The Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency is sponsoring a major storm drain improvements
in Archibald Avenue from Feron Boulevard southerly to Deer Creek Channel in the City of Ontario.
Construction is scheduled to begin in mid March of this year.
The City ofRancho Cucamonga desires to operate and maintain all of the main line and structures
in Archibald Avenue within the City of Ontario. A Cooperative Agreement was recently approved
by the City of Ontario for such approval.
Upon the acceptance of this Cooperative Agreement, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will be able
to construct and maintain the portion of the storm drain in Archibald Avenue within the City of
Ontario.
William J. O~Neil
City Engineer
WJO:MO:dlw
DATE:
TO:
GITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
FROM:
Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager
BY:
Janice Reynolds, Assistant Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT:
CONSIDERATION OF A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
FOR THE PURPOSE OF ISSUING SINGLE FAMILY
MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS
RECOMMENDATION
Consideration of the attached Resolution approving a Joint Powers
Agreement between the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Chino for the
purpose of issuing single family mortgage revenue bonds.
B ACKC- ROUND/ANAl .YS I S
During initial meetings to discuss the Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bond
program in Rancho Cucamonga, local lenders expressed a concern with the
number of available existing housing units in Rancho Cucamonga units
which meet the State sales price criteria established at $160,000. Because $20
Million is the minimum allocation to be considered by the California Debt
Limit Allocation Committee (CDLAC) for the purpose of issuing single family
mortgage revenue bonds, the City's underwriters, Stone & Youngberg, have
suggested forming a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) between Rancho
Cucamonga and neighboring dries.
The cities of Ontario, Chino, Fontana, and Rialto were suggested by local
lenders as possible participants in the program. Staff has contacted each of
these cities, and as of this date the city of Chino has expressed interest in
joining the JPA. The agreement has been scheduled for consideration by their
City Council on March 7. The cities of Ontario and Fontana are considering
the issue and may join the partnership prior to the application deadline of
March 15, 1995. For an initial period, each participating City w~l be allocated a
proportionate share of the bond allocation. Should lenders be unable to fund
all mortgages in a given city during the established allocation period, the
funds will revert to a pool allocation to be used on a first come, first serve
basis in any parridpating city.
Redevelopment Manager
)
RESOLUTION NO. _~'~ ~)~' 7 .-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
BY AND AMONG THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CITY
OF CHINO FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING HOME MORTGAGES AND
PROVIDING FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF A HOME MORTGAGE
FINANCING PROGRAM
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as
follows:
1. That this City make and enter into a '~oint Powers Agreement to
create Rancho Cucamonga-Chino Housing Finance Agency to Exercise
Common Powers of the Cities of Rancho Cucamonga and Chino to Finance
Home Mortgages pursuant to Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety
Code of the State of California"; such Joint Powers Agreement to be in form
this day presented to the City Coundl, and the Mayor is hereby authorized to
execute such Joint Powers Agreement on behalf of the City and the City Clerk
is authorized to attest the Mayor's signature thereto and to affix thereto the
seal of the City.
2. That in accordance with Section 3, of the Joint Powers
Agreement, the Mayor, or in his absence, the Mayor Pro-Tem, a member of
this City Council, is hereby designated as the initial member of the Board of
Directors of the Agency acting on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
such member to serve at the pleasure of this City Coundl.
3. That the City staff is authorized and directed to implement a
Home Mortgage Financing Program in accordance with the Joint Powers
Agreement.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of
· 1995.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~MONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Cotmcil
Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager
William J. O?qeil, City Engineer
Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO.
007 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO.
STLPP-5420 FOR THE STATE-LOCAL TRANSPORTATION
PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROCHESTER AVENUE STREET
IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN HIGHLAND AVENUE AND
BANYAN STREET AND THE BANYAN STREET
IMPROVEMENTS - BETWEEN MOUNT BALDY PLACE AND
ROCHESTER AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION
It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve and execute the attached
Resolution that authorizes the execution of Program Supplement No. 007 to Local
Agency - State Master Agreement, STLPP-5420 for the State-Local Transportation
Partnership Program and a certified copy of said Resolution along with the executed
original copies of said program supplemere be sent to the State of California for their
execution.
BACKGROUND/ANAl ,YSIS
Attached herewith are the duplicate original copies of the above subject program
Supplement No. 007 to Local Agency - State Master Agreemere STLPP-5420 for the
State-Local Transportation Partnership Program.
This program supplement provides the reimbursable funds for the completed
construction of the Rochester Avenue Street Improvements - between HiEbland
Avenue and Banyan Street and the Banyan Street Improvements - between Mount Baldy
CITY COL~rCIL STAFF REPORT
March 1, 1995
Page 2
Place and Rochester Avenue. The project work consists of street paving, storm drain,
street lights, sidewalk, curb, gutter, and landscape improvements. The supplement sets
the State reimbursable portion of the project at $81,740.00 and the City's portion at
$340,690.00. Reimbursable funding ~'om the Supplement Agreement shall be deposited
to the SB140 Account.
Respectfully submitted,
W~Z ~
City Engineer
WJO:HM:cb
Attachment
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCA~MONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO 007 TO LOCAL AGENCY -
STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. STLPP-5420 FOR THE STATE-LOCAL
TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROCHESTER AVENUE STREET
IMPROVEMENTS - BETWEEN HIGI'{LAND AVENUE AND BANYAN
STREET AND THE BANYAN STREET IMPROVEMENTS - BETWEEN
MOUNT BALDY PLACE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinaf. er referred to as
"Local Agency"), has for its consideration and execution the Program Supplement No. 007 to Local
Agency - State Master Agreement No. STLPP-5420 for the State-Local Transportation Partnership
Program authorizing reimbursement of State Share Funds for the construction of the Rochester
Avenue Street improvements - between HIghland Avenue and Banyan Street and the Banyan Street
improvements - between Mount Baldy Place and Rochester Avenue.
WHEREAS, the State of California, Depathsaent of Transportation, District Office 8
(hereinafter referred to as "state") processes and monitors State funded projects; and
WHEREAS, as a condition to reimbursement payment of State Share funds for said
projects, the Local Agency shall approve and execute said Program Supplement No. 007.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, does hereby resolve to:
I. Authorize the Execution of program Supplement No. 007 to Local Agency - State
Master Agreement No. STLPP-5420 for the State-Local Transportation Partnership
Program for the Reimbursement of State Share Funds for the constr~tion of the Rochester
Avenue Street Improvements - between Highland Avenue and Banyan Street and the
Banyan Street Improvements - between Mount Baldy Place and Rochester Avenue; and
2. To authorize the Mayor to sign said Supplement and direct the City Clerk to attach
a certified copy of this Resolution, as well as type in the resolution Number and Date in
the blanks in the third block of said Supplement and for the return of the original copies
of said Supplement to the State of California Department of Transportation along with the
certified copy of this Resolution.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
March 1, 1995
Page 2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Local Agency shall also comply with the "Special
Covenants or Remarks" attached to said supplement including:
1. It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract may have been written
before ascertaining the availability of legislative appropriation of funds, for the mutual
benefit of both parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would occur if the
agreement were executed after that determination was made.
The total amount of State-Local Transportation Partnership funds payable by the State shall
not exceed $81,740 to be encumbered and reimbursed as follows:
FY 94-95 $81,740
This agr~ment is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available by the
California State Legislature.
Said reimburseable funds as received will be deposited into the SB-140 Account.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 1st day of March 1995.
'7 D
f
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. O~qeil, City Engineer
Hertry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer
APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO. 008 TO LOCAL
AGENCY - STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. STLPP-5420 FOR THE STATE-
LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE NINETEENTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS BETVfEEN
CARNELIAN STREET AND AMETHYST STREET
RECOMMENDATION
It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve and execute the attached Resolution that authorizes
the execution of program Supplement No. 008 to Local Agency - State Master Agreement, STLPP-5420 for
the State - Local Transportation Partnership Program and a certified copy of said Resolution along with the
executed original copies of said program supplement be sent to the State of California for their execution.
BACKGROUNDIANA! ,YSIS
Attached herewith are the duplicate original copies of the above subject program Supplement No. 008 to
Local Agency - State Master Agreement STLPP-5420 for the State - Local Transportation Partnership
Program.
This program supplement provides the reimbursable fun& for the completed construction of the Nineteenth
Street Improvements - between Carnelian Street and Amethyst Street. The project work consists of storm
drain, street lights, sidewalk, and curb & gutter improvements. The supplement sets the State reimbursable
portion of the pmjec~ at $174,114.00 and the City's portion at $602,142.00. Reimbursable funding from the
Supplement Agreement shall be deposited to the SB 140 Account.
ResPec~m~-tted'~7,~~
William J. O~eil
City Engineer
WJO:HM:csb
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. q.~- ~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT NO 008 TO LOCAL AGENCY o
STATE MASTER AGREEMENT NO. STLPP-5420 FOR THE STATE-LOCAL
TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE NINETEENTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS -
BETWEEN CARNELIAN STREET AND AMETHYST STREET.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinaf~er referred to
as "Local Agency"), has for its consideration and execution the Program Supplement No. 008 to
Local Agency - State Master Agreement No. STLPP-5420 for the State-Local Transportation
Partnership Program authorizing reimbursement of State Share Funds for the consauction of the
Nineteenth Street Improvements - between Carnelian Street and Amethyst Street.
WHEREAS, the State of California, Department of Transportation, District Office 8
(hereinafter referred to as "state") processes and monitors State funded projects; and
WHEREAS, as a condition to reimbursement payment of State Share funds for said
projects, the Local Agency shall approve and execute said Program Supplement No. 008.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, does hereby resolve to:
Authorize the Execution of program Supplement No. 008 to Local Agency - State
Master Agreement No. STLPP-5420 for the State-Local Transportation Partnership
Program for the Reimbursement of State Share Funds for the corkstruction of the
Nineteenth Street improvements - between Carnelian Street and Amethyst Street; and
To authorize the Mayor to sign said Supplement and direct the City Clerk to attach a
certified copy of this Resolution, as well as type in the resolution Number and Date in
the blanks in the third block of said Supplement and for the return of the original copies :
of said Supplement to the State of California Department of Transportation along with
the certified copy of this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Local Agency shall also comply with the "Special
Covenants or Remarks" attached to said supplement including:
It is mutually understood between the parties that this contract may have been written
before ascertaining the availability of legislative appropriation of funds, for the
mutual benefit of both parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would
occur if the agreement were executed aRer that determination was made.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
March I, 1995
Page 2
The total amount of State-Local Transportation Partnership funds payable by the State
shall not exceed $174, 114 to be encumbered and reimbursed as follows:
FY 93-94 $174,114
This agreement is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available by the
California State Legislature.
Said reimburseable funds as received will be deposited into the SB-140 Account.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this I st day of March 1995.
ORDINANCE NO. 5J ~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN AMENDMENT 94-04, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN
SUBAREA 17, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. Cucamonga County Water District has filed an application for
Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment No. 94-04, as described in the
title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject
Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the
application."
2. On January 11, 1995, and the Planning Commission of the City
of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning
the above-referenced amendment and, following conclusion thereof, adopted
its Resolution No. 94-05, recommending that the City Council adopt this
amendment.
3. On February 15, 1995, the City Council conducted and concluded
a duly noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendment to the
Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this
Ordinance have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all
of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are
true and correct.
SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect
and promote the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, and
welfare; and more particularly:
1. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General
Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
2. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the Development
Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and
3. That the proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land
Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within
the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with
related development; and
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
EA & ISPA 94-04 - CUCAMONGA CO. WATER DIST.
February 15, 1995
Page 2
4. That the proposed amendment will have no significant -
environmental impact; and
5. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives
of the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
SECTION 3: Based upon the facts and information contained in the
proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports
included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City
Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative
Declaration based upon the findings as follows:
1. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and
the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative
Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the
independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has
reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative
Declaration with regard to the application. <
2. That, based upon the standards of the Industrial Area Specific
Plan, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur.
3. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of
the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows:
In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources
or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon
substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff
reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council
during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption
of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations.
SECTION 4: The Industrial Area Specific Plan text, Part IV,
Subarea 17 Special Considerations, con~nencing on page IV-103, is hereby
amended to add the following paragraph:
The portion of Subarea 17 located on the east side
of Center Avenue between Foothill Boulevard and
Church Street is unique because it is bounded on
the north by a flood control basin and on the east.
by a flood control channel. The unusual shape of
the area, as well as ins proximity to residential
areas, presents special site development
constraints. In addition to those uses which are
permitted or conditionally permitted within
Subarea 17, Extensive Impact Utility Facilities
may be permitted in this portion of Subarea 17,
subject to a Conditional Use Permit and the
special site planning and design considerations as
described above.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
EA & ISPA 94-04 - CUCAMONGA CO. WATER DIST.
February 15, 1995
Page 3
SECTION 5: The City Council declares that, should any provision,
section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or
declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent
jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remining
provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance
shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at
least once in the Inl~na Valley D~ily R,,lletin, a newspaper of general
circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated
in the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Brad Buller, City Planner
Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT:
AN APPFAI OF A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAl USF PFRMIT 93-49
- WFSTI=RN DFVFLOPMFNT COMPANY - Consideration of an appeal to
a condition of approval imposed by the Planning Commission in limiting one
wall sign for Building 1, Home Express, within the Town Center Square
commercial center, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between
Spruce and Elm Avenues - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63.
RFCOMMFNDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission,
limiting Building I to a single wall sign at the main entry, through adoption of the attached
Resolution of Denial.
BACKGROUNn:
The Planning Commission conceptually approved the eastem-haif of Town Center Square
commercial center and Best Buy building on July 27, 1994. Conditions of approval
required that the western-half of the Master Plan be submitted for further review and a
Uniform Sign Program be developed for the center. The Commission conditionally
approved the Uniform Sign Program on October 26, 1994. Following two workshops, the
Commission determined that the revised Master Plan had addressed many of the identified
issues such as access, circulation, pedestrian connections, landscaping and architecture,
and conditionally approved the Modification to the Conditional Use Permit on January 11,
1995. This approval included the revised Master Plan, the elevations of Building 1 (Home
Express), Building 2 (Ben Franklin Crafts), Building 8 ( Pet Metro), and their signs. A
condition of approval imposed by the Commission limited Building 1 to one wall sign at the
main entry. This decision of the Commission was timely appealed. The applicant desires
a second wall sign on their west elevation, facing Spruce Avenue. Copies of the appeal
'77
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CUP 9349 APPEAL - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO.
March 1, 1995
Page 2
letter from the applicant, the January 11, 1995 Commission minutes, and staff report are
attached to this report for the Councirs reference.
ANAl YSIS:
A. Approved Sign for Home I::xpress.
According to the approved Uniform Sign Program, a major tenant, such as Home
Express, is allowed to have one wall sign per building elevation, up to a maximum
of three, with a maximum sign height of 24 inches. The sign height may be
increased if the proposed sign is included in the building design, subject to
Commission review and approval. At the January 11, 1995 meeting, the
Commission approved the building design for Home Express, which included a wall
sign on the south elevation with a dimension of 3.5 feet by 32 feet. However, the
Commission did not approve the second wall sign on the west elevation that faces
Spruce Avenue.
B. Appellant's Appeal.
In the appeal letter, the applicant stated that the wall sign on the west elevation is
needed to provide identification to the east bound traffic on Church Street and Town
Center Drive and the south bound traffic on Spruce Avenue. The applicant also
stated that the second sign on the west elevation relates to their pdmary parking lot
and is consistent with the approved Uniform Sign Program and consistent with the
approval of the Ward's Auto Express sign for a street side elevation across the
street within the Terra Vista Town Center.
C. Commission's Concems.
In reviewing the sign request, the Commission found that the north and west sides
of the site are surrounded by existing and future residential uses, as shown in
Exhibit "D." The west elevation of Home Express (Building 1) is a street side
elevation which is most visible to the planned residential use toward the west. The
Commission believes that having a lighted sign on this side of the building will not
be compatible with the residential use because it will create a nuisance problem of
glare. The Commission felt that a building this size is already an identffication and
placing a wall sign on the west elevation will not add to it. The Commission also
stated that the Best Buy building, which is in a similar situation as in Home Express,
was not allowed to have a wall sign on the street side elevation (Elm Avenue)
because of the same concems. With regard to Ward's Auto Express sign, the
Commission stated that the east side of the building, where the sign is located,
faces a commercial center and therefore, does not create the same nuisance
problem. The Commission believed that the consistency of their action would
establish a level playing field.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
CUP 9349 APPEAL - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO.
March 1, 1995
Page 3
In conclusion, staff believes that the nuisance and conflict concerns, raised by the
Commission, are valid. Staff recommends that the Council uphold the Commission's
action. If the Council determines otherwise, staff recommends that the sign height at the
west elevation of Building 1 be limited to a maximum of 24 inches, which is consistent with
the sign criteria.
2r ~1~~~ City Planner
Attachments:
Exhibit "A" - Applicant's appeal letter
Exhibit "B" - January 11, 1995 Commission's minutes and staff report
Exhibit "C" - Commission's Resolution No. 94-69A
Exhibit "D" - Site Utilization Map
Exhibit "E" - Building I elevations (Home Express)
Resolution of Denial
RECEIVED
JAN 2 3 7994
CiTy of Ranc/~o Cucarnonga
Planning D/v/s/on
Band Delivered
January 23, 1995
City Clerk
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Subject:
Modification to Conditional Use Permit 93-49
Planning Commission Resolution No. 94-69A
Gentlemen:
Western/Development Co., the applicant for the modification of
Conditional Use Perknit No. 93-49, respectfully appeals the
following condition to Resolution No. 94-69A:
Planning Division 9) Signs
a) One wall sign for Home Express at the main building entry
with a maximum sign/letter height of 3.5 feet.
We proposed two signs for this approximate 47,000 sq. ft. anchor
tenant for Town Center Square. The secondary tenant identification
sign is on the west side of Home Express, facing traffic on Spruce
Avenue, and was not allowed after discussion by the Planning
Commission. Our appeal is to allow the second sign as conditioned
in the January 11, 1995 staff report(attached).
A few reasons for the requested secondary Home Express sign:
1. The parking field north and west of the Home Express is
premier parking for this tenant and the building sign would clearly
assist vehicular traffic in utilizing this parking area.
2. It assists the customer shopping in Terra Vista Town
Center and exiting onto Spruce Avenue in identifying the location
of the Home Express.
3. It assists the eastbound motorist on both Church Street
and Town Center Drive in identifying the location of Home Express.
4. It assists the southbound motorist on Spruce Avenue in
identifying the location of Home Express.
CJP Hfo D .
.mSI T "A"
Letter
1/23/95
5. It is consistent with the approved Uniform Sign Program
No. 123 for Town Center Square.
6. It is consistent with the existing signs facing Spruce for
Terra Vista Town Center ( Montgomery Ward's Auto Express).
We feel that the requested sign, as conditioned by staff, is
appropriate for the tenant, the shopping center, and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga and appreciate the opportunity to have this matter
reconsidered.
Should you have any questions or require additional information,
please call me at (909) 949-6602.
Sincerely,
Charles R. Beecher
Director of Commercial Project Management
CC:
Rick Mager
Nancy Fong- City of Rancho Cucamonga/
Carl Laughlin- Home Express
DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAT. USF. PF~RMIT 93-49 - W~.STRRN T.AND PROPERTI~-S - A
modification to the development of an integrated shopping center, Town Center
Square, consisting of 13 buildings totaling 225,316 square feet on 25 acres
of land in the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community
Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm
Avenues - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. Related file: Development Review 94-19.
NRW BUSINESS
DEVRT.OPM~NT ~VI~W 94-19 - WESTERN T.AND PROPERTIES - The design review of
detailed site plan and elevations for Building 8, Pet Metre, within the Town
Center Square shopping center in the Community Commercial District of the
Terra Vista Community Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard
between Spruce and Elm Avenues - APN: 1077-421-58. Related file:
Modification to Conditional Use Permit 93-49.
Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. She noted that the
applicant had requested that their name be changed to Western Development Co. on
the resolutions.
Commissioner McNiel asked if there was any enhanced paving for identification of
the pedestrian areas exiting from the front of the major tenants to the parking
area. He commented that on the Best Buy site, the Commission had not requeste~
such identification and he wanted to be sure it was not missed in front of the
other stores.
Brad Bull.r, City Planner, stated that Exhibit D reflected what had been agreed
to at the last workshop.
Commissioner Melcher stated that the north elevations seem to reflect a high
degree of color change. He asked is staff was satisfied that the color change
will be more subtle, similar to Tetra Vista Town Center.
Ms. Fong replied that the colors are consistent with to Terra Vista Town Center.
Commissioner Lumpp asked if the Pet Metre sign approved by the Design Review
Committee was reflected on the elevation.
Ms. Fong replied affirmatively.
Chairman Barker opened the public hearing.
Chuck Beechmr, Lewis H~mes, 1156 North Mountain, Upland, stated he had discussed
with staff the condition requiring additional architectural treatment for the
north side of the west elevation of Building 1, and it was his understanding that
staff was looking for additional molding or medallions, not additional trellises
or recessed arches. He said that would be acceptable.
Cce~nissioner Melcher asked if staff was looking for more treatment than what is
shown on the elevation.
Ms. Fong indicated the additional treatment was for the end of the building wall.
Con~issioner McNiel felt that was reasonable.
Planning Commission Minutes
10
January 11, 1995
Commissioner Melther felt additional treatment was unnecessary as it is a small
element on the back of the building. He thought adding one medallion would
create spacing problens and adding two would draw more attention to that portion
of the wall.
Commissioners Tolstoy and Lumpp agreed with Commissioner McNiel.
Mr. Beecher confirmed that the Pet Metro sign depicted on the elevations was what
had been agreed to at the last workshop. He said it is 23 feet, which is a lot
smaller than what had originally been proposed. He reported they are sponsoring
an ar~c cc~npetition and the ar~ pieces should be ready to put in place in November
1995. He requested that Planning Condition 5e be changed to reflect that the
works of ar~ will be placed at the completion of the plazas Is that occupancy of
the buildings would not be held up. He said they intend to have the ar~ in place
prior to the end of the year. Mr. Beechef observed that Planning Condition 6
calls for the lower central plaza to be completed prior to release of occupancy
for Buildings 7 and 4 and he requested that completion be delayed until they have
a design and begin working on construction of Buildings 10 and 11 because the
landscaping may be destroyed during construction.
Ms, Fong observed that design review of Buildings 10 and 11 has not been
submitted. She said the main entry off Foothill Boulevard will be landscaped on
both sides except the building pads. She said the building pads will be grass
for an unknown period of time.
Mr. Beechef said it should not be too long before they are ready to submit for
Buildings 10 and 11.
Commissioner Lumpp felt the uses of Buildings 10 and 11 may dictate specific
landscape materials or plaza design. However, he thought a backbone landscape
concept and design should be installed because it is the main entry to the
project. He suggested that the applicant work with staff.
Camnissioner Tolstoy stated there is a possibility that Buildings 10 and 11 may
not be built for several years. He agreed that some landscaping needs to be
installed with Buildings 7 and 4.
C~m~nissioner Lumpp said the landscape installed at this time should establish the
theme and the viewshed corridor but he did not think all of the landscaping
should be required at this time.
Commissioner Tolstoy felt the walkway and the major trees should be installed
now.
Commissioner McNlel asked if the parking lot will be phased.
Mr. Beechef replied they hope to start construction of Buildings 1, 2, and 8 in
April with completion of the buildings by August and completion of the full
parking lot in time for fall openings.
Commissioner Melther recalled that when the former tenant for the site now
occupied by Service Merchandise fell out, the applicant defined the storefront
area with a temporary fence that was painted in a design consistent with the
shopping center. He stated this approach is the spine and a major feature of
this project and he thought it would not be excessive to require something
similar on the south and east sides of what will be the building pad with the
plaza now being developed as cc~pletely as possible. He thought the applicant's
argument that landscaping would be destroyed during construction of Buildings 10
Planning Commission Minutes
11
January 11, 1995
and 11 was weak because the same applicant had just inserted two buildings on the
pad at the northeast corner of Haven and Foothill without destroying adjacent
landscaping and herdscape. He said the schedule could later be adjusted if
necessary.
Commissioner McNiel felt grass would be sufficient for the pads and a facade
would not be necessary.
Commissioner Tolstoy agreed.
Regarding Condition 8b, Mr. Beechar said they anticipate submitting Buildings 3
and 4 quickly, but he requested they be permitted to paint the blocks of Building
2 until Buildings 3 and 4 are underway, similar to what they did at Best Buy.
Commissioners McNiel and Melcher felt that was acceptable.
Debts West, Noble Signs, stated she represents X~me Express. She said they would
like "H~ Express, Bed, Bath, Housewares, and Furnishings' on their front sign
because that is the n~me they go by. She showed several examples of where such
signs have been used in other locations. She asked if they could add the
additional verbiage on the building at a place of the Coemission'l choosing.
Chairman Barker asked staff to comment.
Ms. Fong stated that according to the Sign Ordinance, the additional verbiage is
termed extraneous information.
C~mnissioner Lumpp stated that he appreciated Ms. West's comments, but he noted
that the Commission had made it clear to a representative from Home Express at
the last Design Review Committee meeting that extraneous info~nation is not
permitted.
Ms. West stated she had received that feedback from Ms. Fong but H~me Express was
hoping that they could incorporate their full name instead of Just using Home
Express. She noted that Pet Metro is being permitted to have more copy than Pet
Metro.
Chairman Barker stated that the C~m~ission w~uld later be discussing the problem
of users extending their names to be long enough to 'wrap around the building.'
He felt such n~ee and logos are no longer names and logos, but advertising and
that is a major concern of the Commission and the City. Me said the intention
of signage is identification, not advertising.
C(xmnissioner Melcher remarked that Michaels had also put forth a similar request
and had been turned down.
Commissioner McNlel noted that some grocery stores have come in with requests for
"bakery, beer and wine, etc." He said that Ross had indicated that "Ross Best
for Less" is their name and they were permitted to have that signage. He felt
that companies have star~ed to expand names to include advertising. information.
Comissioner Lumpp feZt there was a major difference between what Home Express
is requesting and what was permitted for Pet Metro, in that the Pet Metro sign
states "Pet Metro, The Ultimate Pet Metropolis" and will not lilt products.
C~mnissioner Melcher c~m~nted that the other tenants in the center have only one
sign facing Foothill Boulevard and he questioned why this building should be
permitted a sign on the west elevation facing Town Center Drive.
Planning Commission Minutes
12
January 11, 199~
Mr. Bullet observed that the Coa~nission had discussed the sign on the wee=
elevation the last time they addressed signs at this center, and the Commission
had agreed that this sign was acceptable at the reduced size now proposed.
The Commissioners stated they did not recall agreeing to the sign.
Commissioner McNiel asked what color the sign will be.
Ms. Fong replied that it will be red.
Commissioner Lumpp noted that the center will have signage in the two most
visible colors, red and yellow.
Commissioner McNiel agreed with Commissioner Melcher that there is no need for
the sign.
Chairman Barker said he only recalled discussing the additional verbiage.
Cc~nissioner McNiel recalled that when the secondary sign was discussed for Best
Buy, the Commission decided it was unnecessary because it would only face the
office/industrial and the apartments across the street. He felt this situation
was similar and he did not feel the sign serves a valid purpose.
It was the consensus of the Commission to delete the secondary sign for Hoes
Express.
Co~missioner Lumpp questioned the definition of 'significant' with regard to the
works of ar~ mentioned in Planning Condition 5e. He preferred that the language
be changed to provide that the w~rks of ar~ be similar in size to the art at the
corner of Haven and Foothill. He said he did not mean the same shape.
Chairman Barker felt the developer has a track record with providing appropriate
art.
Ca~nissioner Melcher felt that Commissioner Lumpp was attempting to guard against
an ar~ piece similar to the rams head located in the project south of City Hall.
He felt Ccm~nissioner Lumpp was asking that the piece be of appropriate scale to
the space.
Rick Mager, Western Development Co., 1156 North Mountain, Upland, provided · copy
of the ar~ competition announcement. He stated that a five-member Jury has been
selected to pick the works of art from an art contest they are sponsoring. He
remarked they have allocated budgets of $40,000 and $30,000 for the sculptures.
He said the five Jurors include Mayor Alexander, Randall Lewis, two artists, and
someone from the Wighall Museum. He said they lntend to selec~ two pieces of ar~
which are complementary to the spaces. He felt the Jury will have the best
interests of what will fit in the spaces at he·ft. He requested that the
selections not be confined by definitions.
Commissioner McNiel felt the art contest to be an excellent approach but he
doubted most of the Jurors will take into account the spaces where the pieces
will be displayed. He felt there should be some defining guidelines or ·
definition of the purpose so they w~ll consider the spaces.
Mr. Mager said the five-member Jury could be increased to six with the addition
of a Planning Commissioner if the Commission felt that was necessary.
Planning Commission Minutes
13
January 11, 1995
Chairman Barker felt the Planning Commission had expressed its concerns to the
applicant and the applicant's track record should be sufficient.
Camnissioner Melcher thought the materials provided to interested artists would
include drawings and other data describing the spaces in which the works of art
will be set.
Mr. Mager responded affirmatively and stated there will also be an orientation
meeting.
The Comission felt that would be sufficient.
Mr. Bullet suggested dropping the word "significant" from Planning Condition Be.
He camTanded the applicant for the art contest and noted that the applicant had
requested that the release of occupancy not be tied to the installation of the
art pieces.
Chairman Barker noted the applicant had also requested delaying the construction
of the lower central plaza.
Coc~issioner Melcher felt the plazas should go in and the art can be put in place
at a later time.
Chairman Barker thought the timing of the placement of the art should correspond
with the contest.
Commissioner McNiel asked if the pedestrian area in front of the stores could be
widened from 8 feet to 12 - 15 feet.
Mr. Mager said that would be satisfactozT.
Mr. Beechar said the crosswalks are located at the handicap area and they had
felt there should not be a checkerboard effect of a number of crossings across
to the parking area.
Cou~nissioner McNiel asked if they could be wider than 8 feet. He also asked the
material.
Mr. Beechar said it will be textured concrete.
Commissioner Melcher asked why Commissioner XcXiel wanted them wider.
Co~nissioner McNiel responded that because parking is not located in front of the
building, when people exit the stores they immediately cross to the parking area.
He said most store entrances are rather wide and he felt wider pedestrian
crossings would identify to drivers that people will be exiting the stores in
those areas and crossing to the parking lot. He did not feel an 8-foot wide
strip is significant enough to identify the crossings and get drivers to slow
down. He said his concern is for the safety of people exiting the stores.
~lssioner Tolstoy felt 12 feet would also be better scale for the buildings.
Camnissioner Melcher felt it is ~rtant to understand where the crosswalks are
located, as he said they are not at the store entrances, but rather at the
handicap parking spaces.
Mr. Beechar said the public crossing walk in similar situations is a 10-foot
width and in areas of enhanced paving they are required to place a stop sign.
Planning Commission Minutes
14
January 11, 1995
He felt 10 feet would be a reasonable width. He reiterated they do not match up
to the building entrances, but rather to the handicap parking spaces. He said
the stop signs are required by the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Cc~enissioners McNiel and Tolstoy felt the pedestrian crossings should tie in with
the building entrances.
Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by Melcher, to issue a Negative Declaration and
adopt the resolutions approving modification to Conditional Use Permit 93-49 and
Development Review 94-19 with modifications to change the applicant's name to
Western Development Co., provide that the works of art be placed upon completion
of the plazas, and delete the Home Express sign on the west elevation. Motion
carried by the following vote=
AYES: COMMISSIONERS=
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
- carried
Commissioner Melcher felt the Commission should not have required additional
architectural treatment for the north side of the west elevation of Building 1
because it will make the west elevation appear different from the south elevation
and they will both be viewed at the same time.
Con~nissioner Lumpp stated the condition allows staff to work with the applicant
to come up with a design that will work well and look good.
Planning Commission Minutes
15
January 11, 199S
E7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF RKPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
January 11, 1995
Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
Brad Buller, City Planner
Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USF. PF, RMIT 93-49 WFSTI~.RN lAND
PROPERTIES - A modification to the development of an integrated shopping center, Town
Center Square, consisting of 13 buildings totaling 225,316 square feet on 25 a~res of land in
the Community Commercial District of the Tetra Vista Community Plan, located on the north
side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Eli Avenues - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63.
13F. VF.I ,OP~ RF, VIF. W 94-19 - W~.STi~.RN I.ANT~ PROPF. RTIF. S - The design review
of detailed site plan and elevations for Building 8, Pet Men-o, within the Town Center Square
shopping center in the Community Commercial District of the Tetra Vista Community Plan,
located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues - APN:
1077-421-58.
ABSTRACT: The applicant requests approval of the revised Master Plan, the elevations of Building 1 (Home
Express), Building 2 (Ben Franklin Crafts), Building 8 (Pet Metro), and their signs.
BACKGROUND: On July 27, 1994, the Planning Commission conceptually approveel the eastern half of
Town Center Square shopping c~nter and the Best Buy building with a condition that the applicant submit
the Master Plan for further review prior to approval of a design review for Building 8. The areas of concern
identified by the Commi-~ion were access, circulation, and pedestrian connection on the western half of the
site and landscaping and architectural program for the enti~ site. Sulr~quently, the City received a
Conditional Use Permit application for the revised Master Plan and a Design Review application for the Pet
Metro bUilding. On November 9, 1994, the Commission conducted a workshop to review the development
plans andsdirected the applicant to address their identified concerns. On December 14, 1994, the Commission
conducted 'a' second workshop to review the revised development plans. At that worksh6p the revised plans
included elevations fro' Home Express and Ben Franklin Crafts. The Commission found that the revised
development plans addressed many of the identified issues and that the elevations of the three tenants, with
the recommended improvements, were acceptable. The Commission then direted staff to forward the
applications to the Commission for formal action. Copies of the November 9, and December 14, 1994 staff
reports are attached to this report for reference.
PLA.N.'NING COMMISSION S"' ~ FF REPORT
CUP 93-49 & DR 94-19 - WES....RN LAND PROPERTIES
January 11, 1995
Page 2
ANAI.YSIS:
A,
Master Plan. The revised Master Plan is similar in design to the one conceptually approved by the
Commission on July 27, t 994. However, it shows a reduction in the number of Buildings from 15
to 13 as a result of specific tenants for Buildings 1, 2, and 7 (Buildings 5, 6, and 7 axe combined), and
an increase in the total square footage from 222,605 to 225,316 square feet. Most of the proposed
changes occur at the western half of the site. The location of the two project entries off Spruce
Avenue and the main east-west drive aisle have not changed. The safety and the flow of on-site traffic
from the first project entry off Spruce Avenue to Buildings I and 2 have improved. The Master Plan
shows the key pedestrian connections linking the buildings at the west side of the site and the east side
of Terra Vista Town Center. The landscape and bardscape design for Buildings 1, 2, and 8 have also
changed as a result of specific tenants.
The Commission reviewed the changes and found them acceptable with the condition that a
pedestrian connection be provided from the north side of Building 12 to Home Express. The
Commission and the applicant agreed to staffs recommended improvements to the landscape and
hardscape plan as follows:
The use of acid wash surface material for the concrete accent inset. (Revised as shown in
Exhibit "E").
,
The addition of a row of pedestrian-scale trees along the main drive aisle at the signalized
entry off Spruce Avenue. (Revised as shown in Exhibit "E").
The addition of two pedestrian-scale trees to the west side of Ben Franklin Crafts.
(Conditioned).
,
The addition of a concrete accent inset in front of the second building entry for Pet Metro.
(Revised as shown in Exhibit "E").
The Commission also clarified to the applicant that the streetscape along Foothill Boulevard should
transition to the landscape concept of the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement.
BuildinR, Design for Pet Metro. Home i;'.lDress. and Ren Fr*nitlin Crafto The Commission found
the revised elevations for Pet Metro acceptable. The Commission also found the elevations for Home
Ex, press (Building 1 ) and Ben Franklin Crafts (Building 2) acceptable with the following changes:
1. Add embellishments to the north elevation of Buildings I and 2.
The revised north elevation of Building 1 (see Exhibit "F") shows the addition of a
second tier of painted plaster cornice along the top portion of this elevation. However,
the painted wainscot at the bottom portion of this elevation as reviewed by the
Commission at the December 14, 1994, workshop has been eliminated. Staff
recommends that the painted wainscot with the plaster molding be added back to this
elevation. (Conditioned)
PL.~'N,~ING COMMISSION S"' ~ FF REPORT
CUP 9349 & DR 94-19 - WES....RN LAND PROPERTIES
Januar~ 1 I, 1995
Page 3
b,
The revised north elevation of Building 2 (see Exhibit "G") shows the addition of
recessed arched plaster treatment and plaster molding with metal grill to the east side.
Staff finds the treatment acceptable.
Add molding around the diamond shape tile inset on the north and west elevation of Building
1 tower element. (Conditioned)
3. Add architectural treatment to the north side of Building I west elevation. (Conditioned)
4. Add architectural treatment to the north side of Building 2 east elevation.
The revised east elevation shows the same architectural elements as in the north elevation of
Building 1: a recessed arched plaster treatment and plaster molding with the metal grill (see
Exhibit "G"). Staff finds the treatment acceptable.
5. Add architectural treatment to the blank wall behind the colonnade of Building 2.
The revised elevation shows tile wainscot is being provided (see Exhibit "G"). Staff finds the
treatment acceptable.
A proper architectural treatment or transition to the south side of Building 2 east elevation be
provided. (Conditioned).
~ The Commission conditionally approved a Uniform Sign Pmgrarn for Town Center Square
on October 26, 1994. Pet Metro, Home Express, and Ben Franklin Crafts are Major Users which are
allowed to have one wall sign per building entry with a sign dimension of 2 feet high by 24 feet long.
However, a provision in this Sign Type I also allows an increase in the letter size if the sign is
included as part of design for the building elevations subject to Design Review Committee approval.
The signs for Pet Metro have been included in the building design for staff review. However, the
applicant submitted proposed signs for Home Express and Ben Franklin Crafts store at the December
14, 1994 workshop. Because staff did not have a chance to review the proposed signs against the
approved Uniform Sign Program and the City's Sign Ordinance, the Commission took no action at
that time. Based upon the revised development plans, staff offers the following comments:
Pet Metre Store. Two signs are proposed. The primary sign is located at the main building
entry and consists of the words "Pet Metro" with a metropolis graphic' design behind the
individual letters and secondary words of"the ultimate pet metropolis," with a sign dimensions
of 5.5 feet by 35 feet. The colors are red letters with blue trim for Pet Metro, white letters with
blue background for the additional words, and yellow and blue for the graphics. The
secondary sign consists of individual letters for the words "Pet Hospital," with a sign
dimensions of 2 feet by 20 feet. The color is white. Staff recommendation at the Dec, ember
14. 1994, workshop was to eliminate the graphics and the secondary wording for the primary
sign and reduce the letter height to 3.5 feet. The Commission reviewed the proposed signs and
//
PLANTING COMMISSION S' ' FF REPORT
CUP 93-49 & DR 94-19 - WES....RN LAND PROPERTIES
January I1, 1995
Page 4
found the Pet Metro sign with the graphics and the additional wordings acceptable if the sign
height was reduced from 5.5 to 3.5 feet. The Commission also found the secondary sign
acceptable as shown on the elevation as to the sign location, dimensions, and color. The
revised elevation shows a reduced letter height of 3.5 feet and a total sign height of 5 feet.
Home Express Store. Two signs are proposed for Home Express, one at the main building
entn/and a second one at the west elevation. The signs consist of individual letters for the
words" Home Express." The sign dimensions are 3.5 feet by 32 feet. The color is red. Staff
finds the main entry sign has the proper proportions when placed on the tower element and
is therefore acceptable. The placement of the second sign at the west elevation is acceptable;
however, the letter height should be reduced to 24 inches since the building is much closer to
Spruce Avenue. This item has been placed as a condition of approval.
Ben Franklin Crafts Store. One sign is proposed at the main building entry. It consists of
individual letters for the words "Ben Franklin Crafts." The letter size for the words "Ben
Franklin" is 2 feet and the letter sizes for the word "Crafts" are 4 feet for upper case "C" and
3.5 feet for the lower case letters. The color is red. Staff finds the proposed sign acceptable.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff mornmends that the Commission approve the Modification to Conditional
Use Permit 93-49 and Development Review 94-19 through the adoption of the attached resolution.
Brad Buller
City Planner
BB:NF:mlg
Attachments:
\~
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
Exhibit
"A" - Site Utilization Map
"B" - Revised Master Plan
"C" - Revised Conceptual Grading Plan
"D" - Revised Conceptual Landscape Plan
"E" Hardscape, Pedestrian Nodes and Plazas
"F" - Revised Elevations, Floor Plan, and Signs for Building 1
"G" - Revised Elevations, Floor Plan, and Signs for Building 2
"H" Revised Elevations, Floor Plan, and Signs for Building 8
'T' Details
"J" November. 9, and December 14, 1994, Planning Commission Staff Reports
Exlfibit "K" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 94-69
Resolution Approving Modification to Conditional Use Permit 93-49
Resolution Approving Development Review 94-19
RESOLUTION NO. 94-69A
A RESOLUTION OF TH/PLANNING COMMISSION OF ~ CITY OF RANCLIO
CU~, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONal
USE PE}Q4IT SO. 93-49 FOR A MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMINT OF
AN INTEGRATED SHOPPING CENTER, TOWN CENTER SQUARI, CONSISTING
OF 13 BUILDINGS TOTALING 225,316 SQUARI F~BT ON 25 ACRES OF
LAND IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OF THE TERRA VISTA
COMMUN I TY PLAN, LOCATED ON THI NORTH SIDE OF FO(FEHIv-r-
BOUI~'~ARD B~"reTEF~M SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THIRIOF - APNz 1077-421-58 AND
A. R.-citmle.
1. Western Develolxaent Co. has filed an application for the modification
of Conditional Use Permit No. 93-49, as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit
request is referred to as 'the application.'
2. On the 11th day of Januaz? 1994, the Planning C--eeission of the City of
Ranthe CutameriCa conducted s duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
m. R-molution.
NO~, THERIFORI, it iS hereby found, determined, end resolved by the Planning
Co.~ission of the City of Ranthe Cuessongs as followst
1. This Coslesion hereby specifically finds that all of the facets se~
foz~ch in the Recitals, Pert A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon sub~antial evidence presented ~o this Coomission during the
abort-referenced public hearin~ on January 11, 1994, including written sad oral
staff reports, t~xjethet with public testimony, this C:8~leelQn hersip/
specifically finds as fOilMs
a, The application applies to prQporty located at the north side of
f~hill BOMIe~J~I~dI~ 8proace snd llmAvenueewith a e~=%e~ frontage of 1,600
feet and lot de~h of 700 fee~ end is partially iRisroved with a S7,SOO square
fc~t bulldine end parkin~ area~ sad
b. The properties to the north, east, and south are vacant, and the
property to the west Is dmloped with · cmtcial centers and
c. The design of the project, together with the conditions of
apSeoval, mse~s the applicable standards in the I:)eulollssnt Coda, the doveloimsnt
standards, and the design ~uidelinee in the Tetra Vista Cctnity Planl and
ntd. The dm of the proJec~ will not have a significant impact
s/T "C"
pLANNING COMMISSION . ,SLUTION NO. 94-69A
CUP 93-49 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES
January 11, 1994
Page 2
e. The develol~ent of the project will strengthen the c~mmercial base-
for =he City and provide a diversity of cmrcial centers for the rem£dentm.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of fac~s set
forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this ~islion hereby finds and concludes as
follows=
a. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the
objectives of the Tetra Vista Community Plan, and the purposes of the district
in which the sits is located.
b. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable
thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or
materially injurious to properlies or improvements in the vicinity.
c. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Developsent Code and the Tetra Vista C~mmunity Plan.
4. The Planning ~lssion issued a Negative Declaration for the Master
Plan on July 27, 1994, and the Commission finds there are n~ substantial chinese
the design and the developsent of the Master Plan project.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions se~ forth In paragraphs 1, 2,
3, and 4 above, this Cosmission hereby approves the application subject to each
and every condition set fetch below and in the Standard Conditions, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Plmnning Division
1)
2)
3)
-. 4)
All pertinent conditions of approval contained
Planning Cca~ission Resolution No. 94-69, lncludin~
Standard Conditions, unless as modified below, shall
apply,
This approval is for the Master Plan and the building
design for buildings 1, 2, and 8.
Future developsent of each pad and satellite building
shall be subject to separate Developsent Review
application(s) for Planning Cuemission review and
approval.
Modification to the Master Plan shall be subJecL to
Planning ~ission review and approval.
S) Master Plans
a)
k pedestrian connection from the north aide of
Building 12 to Building I shall be pro~ided at the
time of development of hilding 12. The final design
of the pedestrian walkway and landscaping shall be
PLANNING COMMISSION ~ SLUTION NO. 94-69A
CUP 93-49 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES
January 11, 1994
Page 3
subJec= =o cl=y Planner review and approval prior
issuance of building permine for Building 12.
b)
A pedestrian crosswalk a~ ~he wee= side of Church
S~ree~ and Elm Avenue shall be provided.
c)
A pedes~rian crosswalk shall be provided
signalized ln~ersection of Town Center Drive and
Spruce Avenue.
d)
The final design of ~he upper and lower central
plazas shall be subJec~c =o Planning Cuemission
review and approval. Zero curb and decorative
bollards should be considered a~ =he end of ~he ~wo
plazas where =he main drive aisle bisects.
e)
Condi~ion No, 4 of Planning ~lssion Resolution
No. 94-69 shall be replaced as follower
Two works of a~c shall be placate one each at
~he =we central plazas. The arc work shall be
ins~allei wi=h ~he completion of ~he plazas.
f)
The proper~y owner shall be responsible to maintain
=he =we ar~ works within the plazas and the focal
elemen~ located at Building 1 for the life of ~his
shopping center.
g)
The proper~y owner and/or the ~enant shall be
responsible to ensure all shopping car~s are
collected and stored at the approved deeigna=ei
place at the end of the work day,
h)
Public telephones shall be placed inside the
building. Outside public telephones my be allowed
within the central plazas only, when needed.
Placement shall be subJec~ to City Planner review
and approval prior to installation.
i)
Placement of newspaper racks aid other stree:
furniture, etc. my be allowed subject to City
Planner review end approval prior to installation.
6) Phased Improvements plan,
a)
The foilswing improvements shall be complotei prior
to release of occupancy for hlldimJ 8 (Pet Metro)s
Foothill Boulevard landscaping and pro~oc~ entry
landscaping, Spruce Avenue landecapin~, the balance
of Church Street landscaping, and the bus shelter on
Foothill Boulevard.
PLANNING COMMISSION ;SLUTION NO. 94-69A
CUP 93-49 - W~STERN LAND PROPERTIES
Januat7 11, 1994
Page 4
7)
b)
c)
The following improvements shall be completed prior
to release of occupancy for Buildings 7 (Barnes &
Noble) or 4, whichever building c~ees firstz
hardscale and ~andscale between Buildings 3 through
7 and the upper and lower central plazas.
The following improvements shall be completed prior
to release of occupancy for Buildings 1 (Home
Express) or 2 (Ben Franklin Crafts), whichever comes
firstz bus shelter on Church Street and striped
crosswalk per City standards at the south side of
the si~nalized Antersec~ion of Town Center Drive and
Spruce Avenue.
Building 1.
a)
b)
Painted wainscot with plaster molding shall be
provided along the bottom p~L~ClOn of the noah
elevation.
The diamond shape tile insets on the north and west
elevations of the tower element shall have molding
around thee.
c)
The north side of the west elevation shall have
additional architectural treatment eub~e~C to city
Planner review and approval.
8) Building 2.
9)
a)
Two pedestrian scale trees shall be provided to the
west side of Ben Franklin Crafts.
b)
Proper architectural treatment or transition shell
be provided to the s~uth side of the east elevation.
The ap~lAcant may request a relief of this
condition, if Building 3 has received design review
approval, plan check hal been submitted and in
substantial conformante, and building permit
lssuanoe is pending, at the time of permit issuance
for Building 2, eub~ec~ to City Planner review and
approval.
Signs. The following signs are approved for the specific
tenants of BuildiroNs 1, 2, and $. Future tenants of them
three buildin~s will be subject to the criteria of
approved Uniform Sign Progrms No. 123.
a)
One wall sign for Home Express at the main building
entry with a maximum sign/letter height of 3.S feet.
b)
One vail sign for Ben Franklin Crafts as shown on
Exhibit "G" of the staff report,
PLANNING COMMISSION. DEUTION NO. 94-69A
CUP 93-49 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES
Januar~ 11, 1994
Page 5
c)
Two wall signs for Pet Metre= one at the main
building entry with a maximum sign height of 5 feet
and a maximum letter height of 3.5 feet and one at
the secondary entry with a maximum sign/letter
height of 2 feet.
Engineering Division
1)
All pertinent conditions contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 94-69, including Standard Conditions,
shall apply unless modified below.
2)
Condition No. 4C of Planning Commission Resolution No.
94-69 shall be modified as foilswax
The Foothill Boulevard drive approach shall
conform to Standard No. 101-C, except the width
may be increased to 60 feet with a 2Q-foot median
island, and shall have a concrete right turn
deceleration lane to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer (230-foot minimum), preferably IM~inning
west of the existing catch basin.
3)
Either process a Lot Line Adjustment to make the parcel
line between Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 14331 conform
to the revised drive aisle confl~uration or provide
ingress/egress and drainage easements across Parcel i in
favor of Parcel 2 which reflect the revised drive aisle
confi~uration.
4)
Crosswalks in the public right-of-way shell not be
installed without traffic c~ntroZsJ i.e. four way stop or
traffic signal. Traffic controls shell only be installed
when warranted, to the satisfaction of the City Briginset.
A warrant study for the traffic controls at Church Street
and SIR Avenue shell be provided at the request of the
City InSinset.
5)
Condition MS, 2 of Planning C~mmisslon Resolution No.
94-69 shall be m~tified me follower
e)
Install the traffic signal st Ilm Avenue end
Foothill Boulevard, T~e signal shall be operational
prior to tbe release of ocoupancies. The developer
shell receive credit toward, and reLemrsemsnt for,
costs in excess of the TrenepeL~etion DevelopBent
Fee in conformsrice with Ordinance No, 445,
b)
UlxFrade ~beesis~ln~ signal at Town Center Drive and
Spruce Avenue upon installation of the drive
approach on the seat side op~M)lite TM Center
Drive,
PEANNING COMMISSION SLUTION NO. 94-69A
CUP 93-49 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES
January 11, 1994
Page 6
c)
Prior =o =he issuance of building permits, a signal
wetran= e=udy shell be eubmi==ed to and approved by
the City Engineer to determine the level of
development which will trigger the installs=ion of
interim end ultimate traffic controls at the
following intersections: Church/Mllliken,
Church/Elm, and Church/Spruce. Implement the study
findings as directed by the City Engineer.
6)
Foothill Boulevard driveway skall be operational prior
the release of occupancies.
7)
The entire F~thlll Boulevard frontage landscaping shall
be approved by the City Engineer and City Planner end
shall be installed prior to the release of occupancies,
6. The Secretax7 to this Ccesiseion shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
APPROV2D AND ADOFrED THIS llTH DAY OF JANUARY 199S.
I, Brad Boiler, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Ranch~
Cucmonga, do hereby certify that the forogoin~ Reeolutia~ was duly and regularly
introduced, peseed, end edo!~ed ~y r~e Planning mission of the City of Panch~
Cucmnonqa, at · regular King of the Planning CoaatllLon held on the llth day
of- January DeS, by the following
CJP ~ -~t ~o~.
~hBF/"'D"
;/~!/cG._L
,/I.:..-. ' a -:
~ //',
RESOLUTION NO. ~_~- (E~)__~ O
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE
APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVAL FOR A MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 93-49, WHICH IMPOSED A CONDITION OF
APPROVAL LIMITING BUILDING 1 TO ONE WALL SIGN,
WITHIN TOWN CENTER SQUARE, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN SPRUCE
AND ELM AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63.
A. Recitals.
(i) Western Development Company has filed an appeal of the Planning
Commission's approval of a modification to CUP 93-49, as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the appeal request is referred to as the
"application."
(ii) On the 11 th day of January 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public headng on the Conditional Use
Permit and, following the conclusion of said public headng, adopted Resolution
No. 94-69A approving said permit with conditions.
(iii) The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was
timely appealed to this Council.
(iv) On the 1st day of March 1995, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal and concluded said
hearing on that date.
(v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the
Recitals, Part "A." of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Coundl hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed
and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and
further, the Planning Commission has issued a Negative Declaration for the Master Plan
on July 27, 1994.
3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced March 1, 1995 public hearing. including written staff reports, the minutes
of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning
Commission Resolution No. 94-69A, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
/o/
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 9349 APPEAL - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO.
March 1, 1995
Page 2
(a) The application applies to property located on the north side of*
Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues, on property zoned Community
Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, and is partly improved with a
57,500 square foot building and parking area.
(b) The' properties to the north and west are planned for residential
development, and the properties to the east and south are vacant.
(c) The design of the project, together with the conditions of approval,
meets the applicable standards in the Development Code, the development standards, and
the design guidelines in the Terra Vista Community Plan.
(d) The condition of approval eliminating a wall sign on the west
elevation of Building 1 will mitigate the nuisance problem of glare.
4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council dudng the
above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the
objectives of the Terra Vista Community Plan, and the purposes of the distdct in which the
site is located.
(b) The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto,
including the condition that eliminated a wall sign from the west elevation of Building 1, will
not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan.
appeal.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies the
6. This Council hereby provides notice to Chades R. Beecher of
Western/Development Company that the time within which judicial review of the decision
represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to:
(a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of
this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Cha~es R. Beecher at the
address identified in City records.
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 9349 APPEAL - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO.
March 1, 1995
Page 2
(a) The application applies to property located on the north side of
Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues, on property zoned Community
Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, and is partly improved with a
57,500 square foot building and parking area.
(b) The properties to the north and west are planned for residential
development, and the properties to the east and south are vacant.
(c) The design of the project, together with the conditions of approval,
meets the applicable standards in the Development Code, the development standards, and
the design guidelines in the Terra Vista Community Plan.
(d) The condition of approval eliminating a wall sign on the west
elevation of Building I will mitigate the nuisance problem of glare.
4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the
above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows:
(a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the
objectives of the Terra Vista Community Plan, and the purposes of the distdct in which the
site is located.
(b) The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto,
including the condition that eliminated a wall sin from the west elevation of Building 1, will
not be detrimental to the public health, s~?;ty, or welfare or materially injurious to
properties or improvements in the vicinity.
(c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of
the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan.
The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies the
appeal.
6. This Council hereby provides notice to Charles R. Beecher of
Western/Development Company that the time within which judicial review of the decision
represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to:
(a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of
this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Charles R. Beecher at the
address identffied in City records.
/ oB
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 1995
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II
CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) AND THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING PARTICIPATION
IN THE CLEAN CITIES PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION
The City Council approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to participate in the Clean
Cities Program and authorize Mayor to sign the MOU.
Background
The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is a regional planning
agency with a Council of Governments voluntarily established in 1965 by its member
cities and counties, pursuant to the State of California joint exercise of powers. The
SCAG region includes six counties, 188 cities (of which we are a member), 38,000
square miles and a population of over fifteen million people.
SCAG, in addition to its local planning responsibilities, is desig. nated by the Federal
Government as the Region's Metropolitan Planning Organizatmn and mandated to
maintain a continuous, comprehensive, and coordinated transportation planning process
resulting in a Regional Transportation Plan and a Regional Transportation Improvement
Program.
Analysis
On May 5, 1994, SCAG's Regional Council voted to seek designation as a member of the
U.S. Department of Energy's Clean Cities Program. The Clean Cities program is a
voluntary Federal program designed to accelerate and expand the use of alternative fuel
vehicles in urban communities and to provide refueling and maintenance facilities for
their operations.
SCAG's MOU
March 1, 1995
Page Two
The intent of SCAG's designation is to help streamline the process by which a local
government receives a "Clean City" designation, providing local governments the
following specific services:
Coordinated distribution of information on alternative fuel
vehicle purchase opportunities;
Access to available State and Federal funds and grants:
Greater purchasing capacity and efficiency for public and
private sector fleet purchases; and
Coordinated guidance and assistance to public and private
sectors who wish to purchase alternative fuel vehicles and deploy
other advanced transportation technologies.
This MOU has been reviewed by the City Attorney and is recommended for approval.
By approving the attached MOU, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will demonstrate its
support for the Clean Cities effort and a copy of the MOU will be provided to the
Department of Energy.
~anagement Analyst H
Attachment: MOU
/
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN
THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG)
AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGARDING PARTICIPATION IN THE
CLEAN CITIES PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is the designated
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the counties of Riverside, San Bemardino, Imperial, Ventura,
Orange, and Los Angeles and 184 cities within these counties; and
WHEREAS, the cities and counties within the jurisdiction of SCAG are also located in the South Coast
Air Basin, Southeast Desert Air Basin, and the South Central Air Basin (Ventura County); and
WHEREAS, the South Coast Air Basin is the only area in the nation in the "extreme" category for non-
attainment based on ozone concentration; and
WHEREAS, both South Central Air Basin and Southeast Desert Air Basin are in the "severe" category
for non-attainment for ozone non-attainment; and
WHEREAS, the respective State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittals for these air basins contain
transportation control measures (TCMs) designed to improve the region's air quality and thus bdng the region
into compliance with state and federal air quality standards; and
WHEREAS, the TCMs contained in the SIP submittals for the three air basins promote, inter alia, the
development of zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) and alternate-fuel vehicles (AFVs); and
WHEREAS, the Califomia Air Resources Board (CARB) has promulgated regulations pertaining to
ZEVs and AFVs; and
WHEREAS, the Energy Chapter of the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP)recommends
implementing the development of altemative fuels, AFVs, and ZEVs; and
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) is committed to energy use in the
transportation sector that is safer, more environmentally sound, efficient, and sustainable, and which is less
dependent on foreign energy sources; and
WHEREAS, the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, the Energy Policy Act of 1992, and Exec4ztive Order
12844 (conceming Federal use of AFVs) all establish guidelines for effecting a favorable energy and
environmental situation in the transportation sector; and
WHEREAS, the 1994 SCAG Regional Mbility Plan contains an Advanced Transportation Technology
Strategy that includes AFVs and ZEVs and support for the Southern Califomia Economic partnership, a
public/private organization, to develop early deployment plans for these Technologies; and
WHEREAS, the DOE Clean Cries program serves as an umbrella to structure and achieve the goals
and programs of the Energy Policy Act and to coordinate objectives of government and other federal directives
such as Clean Air Act; and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 5, 1991, the SCAG Regional Council approved a request
to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy to designate SCAG as a member of the Clean Cities
Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will participate in the SCAG
Clean Cities Program in the interest of:.
Reducing the national dependence on imported petroleum for transportation uses, as
specified in the Energy Policy Act of 1992;
2. Complying with the Alternative Fuel Fleet provisions of the Federal Policy Act of 1992;
o
Assisting the region to comply with the Altemative Fuel Fleet provision of Title II of the Clean
Air Act Amendments of 1990, the California Clean Air Act, and local Air Quality Districts
regulations as SCAG region is considered to a non-attainment area;
4. Educating the public on alternative fuels and available vehicles which encourage their use;
Assisting to stimulate the economic vitality of the region and California by encouraging the
utilization of emerging advanceel transportation technologies; and
Encouraging the development of a market ddven and sustained public alternative fuel
infrastructure.
The undersigned agencies and entities enter into this voluntary Memorandum of Understanding in
order.
To join in a coordinated effort to promote and accommodate the acquisition and use of
alternative fuel vehicles, change local and state laws to facilitate alternative fuel vehicles and
infrastructure, and establish necessary refueling sites and servicing facilities;
To provide assistance in the collection and analysis of environmental, economic, and
performance data on alternative fuel vehicle use and experience, and distribution of
information regarding alternative fuels and vehicles;
To work with SCAG and public/private organizations such as the Southern California
Economic Partnership (STEP) to encourage engine manufacturers and alternative fuel
producers to develop vehicles and infrastructure that meet local and regional needs; and
To develop applications for funding or services from the state and federal governments or
other appropriate sources to sustain the objectives of the program.
This Memorandum of Understanding may be amended by mutual agreement between DOE and
signatories or may be terminated by mutual agreement. Signatories may terminate individual participation
upon a 30-day written notice. This MOU is not intended to and does not create any contractual dghts and
obligations with respect to the signatories or any other parties.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, this MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND WORK PROGRAM
PLAN has been executed on the day and year first above written and shall remain in effect for a period of five
years, after which the MOU becomes eligible for renewal.
MARK PISANO
Executive Director, SCAG
WILLIAM J. ALEXANDER, Mayor
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Date Date
/o7
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 1995
Mayor and Members of the City Council
Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager
William J. Alexander, Mayor
ROUTE 30 UPDATE
Mr. Hudgens, CalTrans, gave a brief overview of CalTrans role in the fleeway design and
construction. Mr. Cohoe, CalTrans, then gave a detailed presentation on the development
of the fi'eeway profiles. Mr. Cohoe covered the original proposed above grade profile and
then followed with detailed explanations of the depressed profile and a "new" profile
introduced at this meeting referred to as the "at-grade depressed" profile.
The presentation included the relative advantages and disadvantages of the various profiles
and also the cost implications involved for the various types of construction. Mr. Cohoe had
a handout describing the various profiles and significant features relative to each and is
attached for your information.
Mr. Cohoe then proceeded to describe the geometries of each of the five on/off ramps in the
City of Rancho Cucamonga. These are at Carnelian Avenue, Archibald Avenue, Haven
Avenue, Milliken Avenue and future Day Creek Boulevard. City staff then gave a short
presentation which acted as a backdrop for the Task Force's discussion on interchanges. The
handout relative to this information is also attached. After staffs presentation, Task Force
member Doris Beckher gave a short presentation with a handout relative to her work in
investigating interchanges in her area. Ms. Beckner stressed the committee needs to spend
time investigating interchanges and the implications thereof.
After these presentations there was discussion among the committee members regarding not
only the profile but also the interchanges. All are in agreement that there was a great deal
of information to absorb in one meeting. The Chairman requested the committee members
take time to digest this material and over the next few days prepare questions regarding this
information. Questions are to be turned in to the City Engineer who will provide answers
as applicable and provide this information with the agenda. This should encourage more
discussion regarding these issues at the next meeting.
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ROUTE 30 UPDATE
March 1, 1995
Page 2
The Task Force was in agreement that these issues are extremely important and the time
should be taken to fully develop the issues regarding both the profile and the interchanges.
The Chairman requested staff to prepare traffic information regarding impacts on local streets
if the interchanges are eliminated.
The CalTrans representatives agreed to keep the profile and presentation material at City Hall
for the next month. Committee Task Force members were encouraged if at all possible to
review this information prior to the next meeting scheduled for March 14, 1995. The Task
Force agreed the next agenda will begin with the discussion of profile and interchanges
again and other items will be taken in successive order as time permits.
The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, March 14, in the Tri-Communities Room. The
group further agreed the meeting time will begin at 6:00 p.m. as this appears to allow a lot
more time for discussion on these very important issues.
Respectfully submitted,
WI J
il iam . Alexander
Mayor
WJA:dlw
Attachments
~ 11o i
INTERCHANGE CONSIDERATIONS
General Plan and Circulation Element
· Arterial and collector street pattern is dependent on freeway access.
One mile urban design
Designated interchange allow use of freeway by entire City
· Interchanges allow maximum use of freeway.
· Access should be equal for all areas and business community.
· Shifting or removing interchanges creates impacts on other areas.
Impact on local circulation and neighborhoods
· Lack of interchanges causes more travel on arterial and collector streets
between remaining interchanges.
· Lack of sufficient interchange will cause neighborhood streets to have
through traffic as motorists search for short cuts.
Impacts on Service Levels at remaining interchanges
· If interchanges are eliminated remaining interchanges will have "failure"
level congestion on both the ramps and major City streets.
· Adjacent City street intersections will also reach failure levels of
service.
{ II
//~
ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE MEETING
(January 10, 199S)
February 7, 1995
SUBJECT: ON/OFF RAMPS
Thank you Mayor Alexander, Raacho Cucamonga department heads, Caltrans, SANBAG
representatives, and all others for your willingness to listen to the homeowners concerns
and problems that will affect them as you make Route 30 Freeway plans and decisions to
be presented to the council.
In reading SANBAGs 'Responce to Comments from Route 30 Public Meeting; May 10,
1994', four main issues of concern dramatically stood out:
1. Elevation or Profile
2. On/OffRamps
3. Sequencing
4. Increased Crime
Several months ago the council saw ~t to approve a resolution for a completely depressed
profile. Vd like to thank council for their responce and proactive approach to the residems
concerns. Because the council has already approved the resolution for a completely
depressed freeway, in the interest of time, it may be best for this Ad Hoc committee to
focus only on the depressed profile.
There remains three other major issues of concern expressed by residents attending the
May 10, meeting.
· On/Off ramp
· Sequencing
· Crime?
Over the past several months, I have gathered the following information by personally
walking the area outlined in red on the attached maps, speaking to the residems, and
reading SANBAG's ~tesponce to Comments' publication. I would ask that you please
consider the details of my research carefully. It is my humble opinion that this information
vehicular acce, s to schools, homes, and businesses to be bracketed between the proposed
Archibald and Haven On/Off rarnps.
I understand that the On/Off Ramp subject is just one aspect of overall freeway planrang
and the possible problems to those living and doing business in the area east of Archibald
and west of Haven are issues representative of only one neighborhood. However, at my
age, I am not capable of conducting the same research in all the areas in our city that will
be impacted. Perhaps the 'micro view' can help serve to enhance the 'Big Picture'.
Please refer at the artached fact sheet. Notice how many homes, townhouses, and
apartments are in this small area; it contains lots of people. Maybe we should consider
some things besides genmg on and off the freeway. Most households have 2 cars these
days, that's 9SS dwellings using conservatively 1,910 can with only one way in and out
of their respective neighborhoods. Carefully examine the drawings showing details of how
on/off ramps will connect to surface streets.
Qpestions:
Will there be a frontage road between the freeway and the area outlined on the map?
Will these neighborhoods have emrances to the fromage road7
W'dl the frontage road provide for 2-way or only 1-way traffic?
Will the Haven Ave. on/off ramps connect directly to Haven or use 19th as an access
road?
Are there plans to install any traffic lights in the I mile area of 19th between Archibald and
Haven? (Currently posted 45mph/actual average 50+mph)
What provisions are planned for tra~c control on 19th street?
Notice the number of schools in or adjacent to this area:, families with children live in
neighborhoods with schools close by. There are currently 4 sehoob with 2,e~O0 students
enrolled. There are lots o/k/&, approximate ages 5 - 15, walking to and from schools and
parks every weekday morning, lunchtime, and afternoon. Pedestrians presently crossing
19th street face a 45mph (posted) four lane highway, using 2 unsignaled crosswalks and 2
pan time crossing guards in the I mile area between archibald and Haven. I have spoken
to these crossing guards:
One that used to work at ( at 19th & Hermosa) had been hit by can twice, and had many
near misses; the other ( at 19th & Cartilia) said he has also had many near misses and
considered quitting due to concern for his safety.
Q,esfions:
Wifl crossing signals be instnl[ed ac corners where children re~ulaxly cross [gth stre~ for
schoo[~ (Ramona, Hermosa, Carfilla)
Will there be crossing guards on duty?
Will heavy. trucks be using 19th street during construction?
Will any Freeway arteries be posted as school zones during peak traffic houts?
According to the SCAG Baseline Population Forecast ( refer to SANBAG'S 'Responce to
Comments' Page 15 ), Rancho Cucamonga's population will grow ! 17.5% by the year
2010 This committees recommendations could effect whether or not out city continues to
be considered a clesirahle place to live and work for that future population.
It is my hope that the Ad Hoc committee will sharply focus on each on/off ramp as a
critical part of the overall fi'eeway package. Our recommendations to the council
regarding the 'fine details' need to be treated with the same priority as the issues
them gives.
I am cominuing to gather information for this committee as I am able and will be happy to
offer some assistance to anyone wishing to study other impaled areas.
Thank You,
Dods M. Beckner
One Semor Citizen at Large
FACT SHEET
SUBJECT: Haven and Archibald On/OffRamps
Distance Between: 1 Mile
Dwellings:
Main Area
Wedge area
Barassa Aparmaents
Loma Vista Woods
= 623
-- 166
= 66
= 100
Total Dwellings
= 955
Appro~dmate Total Cars
1,910
Schools:
Vineyard Middle School
Deer Canyon Elementary
Brethren in Christ School
Highland Christian School
Total Students Enrolled
= 931
= 1019
= 300
/}7
La kofarzess
tO getaways
may help city
CRIME: Blink Lkw~y fnxn rn~w,,ys
,,rid e,nphHsl, on ~JmnmniW
in~ ~ m~g ~e f~m c~lted
r~ Hun~nW's ~l~vo ~ety.
HUN~NGTON
rely ~
~u~ mv~ve mlst th~lb ~ Y'
Ch:ef R~ ~wm~ ~ mmum~ I~.
A new
was Ame~'s
p< reo~l ih~nl that
:gO,~ ~idcntl of 0&ely eL'vine
ILVIONGSANCfflD
vioke~t cr,~wt to piece-Nile mmm.
2, G~e
& HMM ? 67
4. Viqmk ~. VA ? 67
~. i~. ~ g 11
~,~M~ 14~
S4. ~e. ~ 21.J]
19. m
~rame rite alenil cruel with lO0,Y(~ or more ml- I
,,y comaultra. The ~ CJ~ C~me R~ji. ca~. ~~mer.~ 1
~lam ~tr~t and a ",Km/" fltily ~ a c
IXt~ ~t~e a Mc~d's ~l~t. ComP~tim hie ~ t~ m am ~l the ~y ~m of
of dJ~ ;H b~tlity du~l a F~h or Jdy ~ ~ ~.
m~e pareraM t~ Ygi ~ la~k a ~vd-ri~ "lt'l ~ f~ m i I; ~ am m
in~lptmn d~ belt~ i by ~ty ~ royeLM," / N~ ~, m write a d~
crim~mmn~mp~,.,~nm~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e i~
~luN the [mwl~ II ~ ~ iwl ,
Huntington named safest city
C;RIMI: The prrmoonenmelt canes In a new nadeed crimHtatlustlm bode
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
FROM
ROUTE 30 PUBLIC, MEEflNG
MAY 10, 1994
June8. 1994
!
I
/~/
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
BY:
SUBJECT:
March 1, 1995
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
Mayor and Members of the City CouncilS,
~.,.~
MAYOR PRO TEM REX GUTIERREZ'AN D COUNCILMEMBER PAUL
BIANE, AS MEMBERS OF THE CABLE SUBCOMMITTEE
SUSAN MICKEY, MANAGEMENT ANALYST I
CONSIDERATION TO IMPLEMENT THE GOVERNMENTAL
PORTION OF THE PEG ACCESS CHANNEL
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider implementing Phase One of the governmental
portion of the PEG Access channel.
BACKG RO UND/ANALYSI S
The City's cable ~'anchise agreement allows for the implementation of a PEG Access channel(s)
(Section 6.3) and Marks CableVision has provided Channel 3 for that use by the City. At the request
of the Cable Subcommittee (Gutierrez and Blanc), staff has researched the development of the
governmental portion of PEG Access. Because there are no funds available to maintain and operate
large-scale governmental access programming, it is recommended that the Council consider a
"phase-in" plan. It is recommended that Phase One be implemented for a minimum of six months
prior to considering expansion of the program. This will allow time to evaluate the impact of the
program on staff time. Staff recommends starting on a limited scale and then, in the future, if
funding allows and the Council chooses, expanding to include a larger format. Currently, the City's
PEG access fund amounts to approximately $160,000. Since the funds are restricted to 0nly capital
expenditures, and cannot be used for maintenance and operation, a conservative approach is
recommended. A phased-in plan for developing the City's program would accommodate the
uncertainties in the budget while still utilizing the PEG channel to benefit the community. With the
implementation of any of the phases, policies will have to be developed for the use of the
governmental channel. The following is a description of the various phases the Council might want
to consider:
j
PHASE ONE: Broadcast of a bulletin board or community calendar for items of import or interest
to the residents. This would require the purchase of a character generator that would cost
approximately $1,500 - $5,000, depending on the system purchased. In order for the equipment to
be kept and used directly from City Hall, a return link from City Hall to the cable company's head
end will have to be installed. Marks CableVision is required to install this remm link per the
franchise agreement. Representatives fi'om Marks have said that they anticipate 45 days to complete
the line. It is expected that staff time would be minimal with such a program and could be handled
with current staffing.
PHASE TWO: Broadcast of special interest tapes to the community. IE. Public safety. League of
California Cities tapes. etc. This phase will require a greater amount of staff time and more
equipment needs, so it is recommended that we delay implementation of this Phase until we evaluate
the impact Phase One is having on operational costs. Equipment expenditures for this phase could
be as simple as purchasing a single tape deck. A commercial grade tape deck would run
approximately $1,500 - $3,000. Mother option would be for the City to invest in a computerized
playback system that could be programmed to run and renm tapes. The City of Chino has such a
system with five tape decks that allows them to run five tapes per interval. This system would cost
approximately $20,000 - $25,000. With the introduction of more sophisticated equipment comes
the likelihood of generating more expense for repair and upkeep of the equipment and for staff to
manage and troubleshoot the equipment.
PHASE THREE: Broadcast - either live or taped delay - of the City's meetings. Depending on the
format used, this would require more expense, not only in terms of equipment, but in personnel, etc.
There are various levels' of this phase that can be implemented. For example, a "bare bones"
program can be introduced where the current in-house closed circuit camera is replaced with a fixed
commercial grade camera (cost is approximately $2,000) and the Council meeting is either taped
or broadcast live. Another example of a "bare bones" program is to have a cable company film the
meeting with a single camera. Comcast provides this service to the cities of Ontario and Upland as
part of the franchise agreement. However, Comcast does not pay any PEG Access support to either
city. Although these methods are less sophisticated, the Council may want to consider them as more
cost-effective methods of televising Council meetings. Even with such modest programs, staff
anticipates an impact on staff time and resources.
Another option is to have students from Chaffey College do the filming under supervision of their
instructors. In exchange, the City could provide Chaffey with some telecommunications equipment.
This is an allowable expense by the franchise agreement of our PEG access monies. There would
be considerable staff time involved in coordinating such a program. Representatives from Chaffey
College have expressed an interest in "sharing" the PEG Access Channel at a future date. This will
be another option for the Conncil to consider in the future.
PHASE FOUR: Live broadcasts of City meetings. as well as original programming. originating
from City Hall and managed by City staff. This would require modifying the Council Chambers
(lighting, etc.) to accommodate filming. There is also the need for equipment to film, edit, mix and
broadcast such programs. Technical staff would need to be hired to manage the program. Currently,
the City of Chino has such a program. Chino's budget is $155,000 per year and requires two full-
time staff members. This cost does not reflect equipment costs. The City of Brea offers a similar
program on a more limited basis. Brea's audio-visual budget is $100,000 and includes one full-time
and two pan-time staff. This figure does not include secretarial support staff. Obviously, this option
will have to be delayed until funding for maintenance and operation of such a system becomes
available.
Due to the uncertainties regarding telecommunication legislation, the City must keep in mind the
possibility that the federal government may eliminate PEG Access support monies and/or franchise
fees. Any PEG Access program, as well as the general fund budget, will be drastically
affected by such action.