No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997/08/27 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY AUGUST 27, 1997 Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Barker Vice Chairman McNiel Commissioner Bethel __ Commissioner Macias__ Commissioner Tolstoy Ii. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 13, 1997 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. Aft such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-13 - WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS - A request to develop a master plan for ~'retail shopping center consisting of design review for 116,394 square feet of leasable space on 11.75 acres of land under the Community Commercial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 7), located between Spruce and Elm Avenues on the south side of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-352-63 through 69. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related File: Tentative Parcel Map 15044. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15044 - WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS - A subdivision of 11.75 acres of land into 11 parcels in the Community Commercial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 7), located between Spruce and Elm Avenues on the south side of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-352-63 through 69. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related File: Conditional Use Permit 97-13. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15027 - ANDERSON - A subdivision of 2.45 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Vicara Drive approximately 287 feet east of the intersection of Sapphire Avenue - APN: 1061~141-05. Staff has prepared an environmental Notice of Exemption for consideration. V. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. Vl. COMMISSION BUSINESS VII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shal/ be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I, Gaff Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 21, 1997, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. Page 2 VICINITY MAP I I I. A,T.A S.F. RR CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 27, 1997 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Miki Bratt, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL PERMIT 97-13 - WOHL/ RANCHO PARTNERS - A request to develop a master plan for a retail shopping center consisting of design review for 116,394 square feet of leasable space on 11.75 acres of land under the Community Commercial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 7), located between Spruce and Elm Avenues on the south side of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-352-63 through 69. Related File: Tentative Parcel Map 15044. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North South East West Developed Retail Center - Community Commercial, Terra Vista Community Plan Hotel and Vacant - Industrial Park (Subarea 7), Industrial Area Specific Plan Vacant - Industrial Park (Subarea 7), Industrial Area Specific Plan Developed Restaurant - Industrial Park (Subarea 7) Industrial Area Specific Plan General Plan Designations: Project Site - Community Commercial North Community Commercial South Industrial Park East Industrial Park West Industrial Park Site Characteristics: This site is 11.75 acres of sandy soil generally sloping to the south and covered with old growth, abandoned vineyard. A mound of fill material occupies the southeast portion of the site and is sparsely covered with weedy vegetation. A drainage easement runs north and south in an alignment east of the middle of the site and is incorporated into the Site Plan. Mimi's restaurant and parking area functions as the first phase of developrrrent of the site and are also incorporated into the Site Plan. Two access points and drive aisles exist (one from Spruce Avenue and the other from Eucalyptus Street) and are also incorporated into the subject Site Plan. Reciprocal access agreements are in- place. Infrastructure for the site, including curb and gutter but not sidewalks was completed as part of the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Master Planned development. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-13 - WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS August 27, 1997 Page 2 Parking Calculations (see Exhibit "B"): Type Square of Use Footaqe Number of Number of Parking Spaces Spaces Ratio Required Provided Retail Shopping Center (includes Mimi's) 118,800 5:1000 594 659 BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: On May 1, 1996, the City Council approved the change of General Plan land use designation from Industrial Park to Community Commercial. On June 5, 1996, the City Council approved the addition of Community Commercial retail uses subject to a Master Plan for the 14.45 acre site subject to a Conditional Use Permit. On August 28, 1996, the Planning Commission approved development of a restaurant (Mimi's) as an independent use but also with the understanding that it would be integrated into development of a planned shopping center as Phase 1. The Commission also gave direction that development of the center be compatible with the existing hotel. General: The original application was for 116,394 square feet of new leasable space. Revised plans have reduced new leasable area to 112,300 square feet. For the purpose of master planning, including parking requirements, Mimi's Restaurant is included and brings the leasable area to a maximum total of 118,800 square feet. The 112,300 square feet will be constructed in up to six additional phases. Mimi's restaurant is considered Phase 1 of the Shopping Center and has been completed. The next phase will include all frontage improvements for Foothill Boulevard as will as the primary drive access from Foothill Boulevard and is expected to be Phase 2 identified on the Phasing Plan. Site improvements will continue ~lements introduced with Phase 1, such as light fixtures, decorative paving, clearly defined pedestrian pathways, and the undulating berm along the Foothill Boulevard frontage. Shared driveway access and reciprocal parking agreements with the hotel are in-place. The major building adjacent to the hotel will be compatible in design with the hotel. Special conditions have been attached to address issues unique to this application. The long and shallow site impacts the distribution of parking, and therefore requires attention to the relationship of parking to intensive uses such as restaurants. Further, because of the site constraints, no drive-thru fast food restaurant is permitted. The design features a central food court and anticipates outdoor food seating areas; therefore, outdoor food seating requires further definition as development occurs. The design includes a paseo through the central tower, and physical and visual access to adjoining businesses is required to enhance the safety of the pase_o.,, Also, Planning Commission Policy for Shopping Centers located along Foothill Boulevard requires the incorporation of public art, for example: unique fountain design, sculpture, mounted tiles which depict a stow, base relief elements, etc. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee met on August 5, 1997, and recommended approval subject to conditions including revisions to the Site Plan and Elevations. The Design Review Committee also considered the subject application on June 3, 1997. Further, on June 11, 1997, a Planning Commission workshop was held to review the site plan and elevations. All recommendations by the Design Review Committee and by the Planning Commission have been incorporated into the project design. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-13 - WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS August 27, 1997 Page 3 Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee met on June 4, 1997 and recommended approval subject to conditions including completion of street frontage improvements, posting all frontages "No parking," and restriping Elm and White Oak Avenues to include two-way left turn lanes. Signs: A Uniform Sign Program is required. Consistent with the City's sign code, the maximum number of signs permitted for any one tenant shall be three, including monument identification, and business identification signs shall not be permitted on the rear elevations of buildings. Any signs shown on the plans are "typical" and for information only. All signs require a separate application. Environmental Assessment: An Initial Study has been completed. Staff has determined that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment. FACTS FOR FINDING: Staff finds the subject application to be consistent with the General Plan and the requirements of Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Further, the proposed use is compatible with surrounding land uses. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Negative Declaration. City Planner BB:MB:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "_D.2 Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit 'T' Vicinity Map Site Plan Phasing Plan Grading Plan Landscape Plan Elevations Design Review Committee Minutes dated June 3, 1997 Planning Commission Workshop Minutes dated June 11, 1997 Design Review Committee Minutes dated August 5, 1997 Exhibit "J" Environmental Assessment Parts I and II Resolution of Approval with Conditions DPPING 'ENTERs, i VACAN:'T' SHOPPING CENTER FOOTHILL BOULFVAF~D (HWY P, OUTE 66) \ rn -t "g WHITe' OAK N m --I --u I / m FOOTHILL RE-FAlL 7,004 51~ BOULEVARD " ~,~1 5~itYiCEJ~EIZ,,jL ~,QI~VlGE I~!~ FAlL -- I ~ ....EUCAL~'PT'u$ " ................................. RE.T.6IL 5,870 $~ -( mH-D hi m --t -D I'! ..... ~L~ RI"AR~CLrYATtOH-:-' I,L~JOR ) m --I --u .... t'.1 -'1,1 I~1 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:00 p.m. Miki Bratt June 3, 1997 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-13 - WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS - A request to develop a master plan for a retail shopping center consisting of the design review for 116,394 square'feet of leasable space on 11.75 acres of land under the Community Commercial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 7), located between Spruce and Elm on the south side of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-352-63 through 69. Related File: Tentative Parcel Map 15044. Backqround: Direction on site plan design has been given by the Commission as part. of a series of application reviews. The most recent was Design Review 96-17 for Mimi's Restaurant. The restaurant is open on the noahwest corner of the site and a hotel occupies the southwest corner of the block. The autcmobile circulation plan and the pedestrian circulation plan reflect the Commission's direction. Strong easVv,'es( and north/south walkways provide clearly marked pedestrian pathways through the career. The ske is relatively long and narrow. The back of the retail buildings arelccatedopposkethefron~of future office buildings on the south side of Eucalyptus Street. To address the back-frontlocadon, a central paseo provides an attraFtive en~W from Eucalyptus Street. Screening, landscaping, and design elements have been added to mitigate the back door orientation of the center ~o Eucalyptus Street. Staff Comments: The following commen~s are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this Park~nq: S~aff analysis indicates ~na.. ,,,v site is u,ae,-oarke:'. Shopping center parking calcu!a~ions are based ,on reciorocal par.king opportunities. mov,'vver the par.-.~% calculation muse be based on ~n~ floor area for '~'~ ¢n~:~ s:te and not jus~ the floor area for this application. The :,oorareafor"~ ' site. '"~;'- ' ,n_ en':re including .,,~ ,,. ~, is i 22.5-94 square '~=~ ~or ',vhich" ~ ,~. ,n~ code would allow uot.olo,404squarefeetfor ~-' ,'~ ' . " r~,au,¢n, use. Deducting Mimi's floor area (5,500 square feet) would I~/_ 11,904 square '~=~ for additional = ' , ' r~s,.auram. The design with a food court and outdoor seadne as the focus and Foothill pads v.,hich invite -= ' ~, = ; = ' ~ , ~s,,auran~ d~¢~loom~n,. strongly indicate that i ~,904 square feet for = ' '~ ' ' r~s~au, ~m use is unrealistic. Further, outdoor seadng areas have no~ been identified and must be included as restaurant seating. Either"= ~n~ floor area for" = ~,n~ center must be ~ "~ project must be conditioned to limit food sen.,ice to r=~uced and additional parking provided or ,n~ 11,904 square:==~ I nela,,vrisnotrealisticgiventhedesignisfocusedona foodcou,% "~--; ~n~ mass of" = .,~n_n~ adjacent to" = ,,,¢~,ne. There areb;/omassingissues. One is"~ ~,n~major'= ¢ ' ~,n~hotel ~ = ~ ' ~n~ buildings. A trellis ~l~m~n, is intended and tne other is lne relationship of tne tower ~l~m~n~s to" ~ to break the mass and soften the facade of the 22,2B1 squ~re foo~ ma~or ~enant building elevation which faces the hotel. Awalk-throuchtower~l~m~n~intneno~hv,,estcornerprovidesadditional design relie~ ~o ,n~ overall mass. The central tower element appears ven/large and heavy in relation to" ~ ,n~ b,','o flanking 5.091 square foot seP,z[ce =' ' ne . r~,a~lbuildings. T' applicant will presen~ three dimensional mcdels o[ both elements in order ~o demonstrate the visual impact of massing and its appropriateness to the overall massing of" =. '= ' ~n_ ProJ_CL DRC COMMENTS CUP 97-13 - WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS June 3, 1997 ~age 2 DesiGn elements. The combination of design elements is unusual. On the one hand there are heavy, almost medieval, 'rustic stone elements, particularly a bulky central tower, and on the other hand there are lean, angular, geometric color bands and medallions which have a post-modern look. Further, the design, in a playful manner, juxtaposes geometric elements, including rectangle, sphere, and trapezoid. Also, entry treatments for major tenants suggest several decades of add-on development. For example, a Gtue-lam arch is reminiscent of White Front stores and a drop metal awning suggests an old K-Mart design. Innovative design is encouraged, provided the scheme as a whole presents an integrated appearance. Staff has asked for more detail and supporting illustrations. The applicant states that these elements have been used in successful existing retail developments and will provide examples. Secondan,, Issues: Once all of the major issues have b==n ad,.r_ss~d, and" ~ ~ ,imv p~rmlLtlng. the Committee ,,,.,ill discuss the following secondan,,, design issues. : 1. Food Court Area and Food ServiceSoaces: The two service retail buildings havelhepotentialto be the magnet v,,hich anchors this cen~er. They are loca~ed adjacent to a square for which patio seadng is to be provided. This could develop in~o a food court similar to the Terra Vista and Virginia Dare food couP, s, or may develop in~o small shops. several of which specialize in items such as coffee. doughnuts. bagels. yogurt,. ice cream. and sandwiches. Design and managemen(can facilitate or hinder the success of open eating areas. The retail spaces must be carefully oriented to the outdoor sea~ing area. pa,-t. icu!ariy the area under the tower. To maintain a desirabte sea~ing space within the ~o'.,,'er paseo, abutting businesses mus~ have visual and actual direct access to ~he area. ~Z,~hout "eyes on ~he s(reeF' ~he covered paseo could become a hangouL attrac~ misbehavior, and generatiy be perceived as an unsafe area by the general population. Therefore windows and doors must be added inside the tower etemenL -' . ,_ham '~,,,l~n a po,~nda[ defined outdoor space ad]acen~ l ne food court, design should orov[de each '= ' "' '~" . ' r~,ad service to their leased space. The applican~ should provide a conceptual ftoor plan for tne ~' ' buildings including ,he area usable for outdoor ~" " s~a,~ng idenfi~ed by dashed lines and include the maximum area allowed for food service for purposes of parking calculations. The applicant should a!so provide a use :plan for the courtyard which assigns responsibilities and opportuni[ies in order to maintain a clean, safe, and desirable eating area. Outdoor space assignments should relate to ~ ' "= ,n_ capacity of the Ioca~ion and available space. Tables and chairs should b: hm~_d in number to" ~ , assigned space and be provided by ~n~ ~nan,.s. Policy Issues: The following items are a ma,,_r oi Pla,nning Commission :)olicy and should be incorporated into the '= ' proj_c, d_~,ign withou~ discussion. P:,,~ rock is proposed as a major design ~l_m_n, and shall be native rock and not manufactured rock. 2 To be consistent with the overati des[on character of": ' . ,n~ buildings, a glue-lain beam entry elemen~ shall replace the metal awning elemen~ proposed for "Major 3." DRC COMMENTS CUP 97-13 - WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS June 3, 1997 Page 3 The maximum number of signs permitted for any one tenant shall be" = ,nre~, including monument identification. '- Business identification signs shall not be placed on the rear elevations of buildings even though they directly face a s~r~et. Upon installation, the leaf canopy of the courtyard palms must be high enough to provide clearance above the pedestrians path (a 12-foot clean,,,,ay is suggested). Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the '= ' , proj~cL, give the apolicant fur. her direction, and bring the project back to Design Review Committee for furlher review. Desi~an Review Committee Action: Members Present: Bill Bethel, PelerTols(oy, Brad Bullet S~affPlanner: MikiBra~ A..,:ZeF considerable discussion of the applicant's design proposal, the Committee recommended that the ,ul, Commission review and comment on the project design at a workshop on June 11, 1997, before it is referred back for any revisions. ,v "'== Ln~ a:)~lican~ consider revising" ~ Th=Comm~L~_ sug~es~edtha~" = ,. ,n~ parking plan to avoid conflicts ~ ...... future and 3rovide flexibility for h[ch intensity uses such as restauran~ uses. .... z~_n use:s , ~ m== .... ' Ln_ am~lican~ d~r , ~.~.,~an circulado,n, to and ~hr.ough ~he cen~er, ,.','as discussed and "~ .. ' V' ::nsider conce,:~s similar ~o [hose used v,'ithi.n TeFra ~s~a. !n general the Committee liked the rock elements incorporated into the Center, as well as the design of the central food/se,'-vice buildings, but had concerns about the number of different design elements used, pa~icularly lhe combination of "pueblo" and entn/ awning elements used for the major spaces. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting June 11, 1997 Chairman Barker called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 11:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the De Anza Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. 'ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: STAFF PRESENT: PRESENT: David Barker, William Bethel, LarryMcNiel, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: Rich Macins Miki Bratt, Associate Planner; Brad Bullet, City Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer NEW BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-13 - WOHIJ' RANCHO PARTNERS - A request to develop a master plan for a retait shopping center consisting of design review for 116, 394 square fee! o¢ leasable space on 11.75 acres of land under the Community Commercial designalion ot' the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 7), located between Spruce and Elm on the south side of Foothill Bourevard - APN: 208-352-63 through 69. Related Fife:Ten~ativeParceIMap 15044. Peter Desforges, applicant, and Tom Bond, project architect, presented the design elemenls of the project. Following general discussion, the Commissioners present supposed the overall architectural design concept and directed the applican~ to modify elements of both the si~e and architec[ural design and work with staff prior to rescheduling the projec~ for Design Review Committee as follows: 1) Review and revise parking to achieve a better distribution o¢ parking spaces to leased space destinations and provide sufficient parking for existing and future restaurant users. 2) Review and revise pedestrian flow to achieve a more pedes[rian friendIy environment and increase safety. 3) Provide stronger entry statements for the maior stores. 4) Revise the color acc.e'rtts to avoid trendy and dated appearance. 5) Revise the medallion statement to avoid trendy and dated appearance. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. DESIGN' ~., LF_., ,,~, CO.'vf.',,f.E,.'x'TS 7:_30 a.m. .,'X,,Ii!.d Brax August 5, 1997 ENVIR. ON,.'MENTAL ASSESSNENT .&N"D CONT)ITION.-x~ USE PE'~,'flT 97-13 - \\"OHZ/R_&N'CHO PARTNERS - A request to develop a :master plan for a re,-'=jl shopping center consisting. o£design review For 1I/5, 394 square Feet of' leasable space on 11.75 acres of' tand ,rander the Cormm~niw Corminertial designation of,he Industrial .Area Specific Plan (Subarea 7) located between Spruce and'Elm Avenues on 'the south side of'Foothill Bou!ev~-d - APN: 208-352-6.3 tN,*ough 69. Related File: Tentative Parcel Map 1 _5044. Background: Direction on Ske Plan desitn ,has been given by' the Co,re. to. isaiah as bari of' a series of',aaplication rev~ev,'.s. The most recent were rne Design Review Com.mJ,.qee meeting o~ June .3, 1997 and tn~ Planning Com_m~ssion works'non on June l l, 1997, (see a~ached Design Review Com~menis and dra~ Workshop minutes). "~ = · tn~ a.~plicant met v.-;tin staff on Jul,,' 1 I997 to eresent resaonses to each of-h-- desi?v.n ~ssues raised bv the Platonine. Commission and staff indicated :h=r the re(isions ,.,.'ere on the -'o', - . _ . ..... ~=n~ track and scheduled the item ~: Design Review Commit. es. Staff' Comments: ."4aior issues: The following broad design issues ,.;'ere raised by the Plamqing Commission and will be focus of Co,.'.'mmMee discussion reo=,'d;no this project: Parking. The applican: has -=',,' -='~ the Dian and ~=-:';=o area. Consistent with the reauirement for a shoaaing center, a total of 594 spaces =~e required ~d 659 states =rovided (65 sna~es above ~ne restatement). This was accomn!~shed in sm~ b':'a reauct:on of 4~094 square rest of leased space and by e','Tznding" ~ _ ' , ,n~ Derking area east ofN. fimi's (Phase 2). The result is ~ better salenee :. =-'"-~ in relationshis to sisres. However, ihe aas!ican: must s~i!! ~aen[~b' me amount o~outdoor resr=':,=~t es=tins ~ .... to be provided for iv= ~od court =~d allocate parking snaces accoraingO. Pedes.'.fian fiov.'. Pedestrian access from Eucalvatus Street has been added adjacent to driveway access openings and .nro',,'ide aath,.vavs from 2Lca!:.'p.:us Street to stores bv way of sidewalks adjacent to drive aisles. Also, sidewalk has been adfieJ to the east side of,.(.'fajo~ 4. Pedestrian access from the comer of Eucalyptus Street and Elm Avenue ,.,,'as discussed, as ,.,.'el! as access adjacent to the existing driveway west o,.: Major I however, because of fne steep grade changes and ADA accessibility requirements, sidewalk access was not feasible For either location. ,3. -'"'"="-=- Eat.-',' ' ' ~"~ · " ~,~,..z.:,~.~>. c~nooles n., ~ been revised to .~ro'.'i.Ee ..... ~-' but individualIv d~san~uishable trellis elements. The resulting entries are .',-:-'=-, ' ' the ' co~..=:=~ ....:.viin Foothill Bou!e','ara look for major stores. Color accents. The-es!or pale,is has b-'=', .m,---.~ .Medallions and other de~i~n accents. The roetin!lions ~='= seen .... ~,~ ' reconfigured to reflect the ;' ='~. :, '- walls' Nee'nee 'nave reala.,:e~ :os:s to Dro,.'~de an atwact:ve design accent. OUktreSS ~[~.~n:~ of the . . Secon,4~r'v Issues' On~e ~11 of,he major issues "="= seen =~c:-~,=,=m ~nd time .... will elscuss the fol!o'o.'mg seconeap,' design essuss: r =nd~c=,~in= Landscase fingers ' = '-'' - ":~---' n..,, ~ c. een .mo., ...~,.: along Foothill Boul--','=:d =~d = !andscaDs island :s proposed ,:or tne Elm Avenue oarking area. DRC COMMENTS ZUP 97-13 - WOHL/'R_,--~"q'CHO PARTNERS .august 5, 1997 Page 2 Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy' and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. Tree wells must be added to the Elm Avenue par'king area. 2. Policy issues enumerated in the Design Reviev,' Comments of June 3, 1997 shall also be incorporated into the project design. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Comminee recommend approval of the project to the Planning Commission with conditions. A~acbwnents Design Review Committee .Action' .Members Present: Bill Bethel, Rich ,.'vfacias, Dan Coleman L.~.~t Brart Starr Pintuner: ' '"' :'he Design Review Committee reco,?maended approval with the following changes: Pedestrian access from Eucalvotus Street to be limited to central enid'. \VaI.-,> adjacent to Foothill Boulevard driveway shall o,, 5 3. Entry for ,.Major 3 to be redesigned without rod supports and with curved and colored recess similar to N'fajor Building 1. Free standing entO' ,.,,'all for Major 2 to be redesigned x,.Sthout angled sides and ,.`.Sth cornice at the top. .Adjust art deco medallion sizes to be more propo~ional to building plane location. Rock towers to be illuminated by up lighting aT night. Comairtee expressed concern that Staff' to research yello,.,.' color used in Terra Vista Promenade. proposed color would be too similar to Promenade. C(,"/ of Ranc,~o Cucamcn Pfanni~ (gO9) .477.2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I- Initial Study) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basiclcomponents of theproposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to. City policies, ordinances, and guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. G~/ERA/. B/FORMA INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittaL' City staff ;,,'ill not be available to perform woff~ required to provide missing information. ,.~.2ph~a,,on Number for the pro, iect to which this form pertains.' Name g Address of developer or project sponsor.' Contact Person Name & Address of person prepan'ng this form (if different from above).' Telephone Number: L~;[TSTD 1 .b'./?,D - 4/9~ Page 1 o¢ 10 Information indicated by asterisk (') is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 1 1) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west.' views into and from the site from the primany access points which serve the site,' and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): '~-~ ~ ~; Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessan/): .~. C'~ ~ "~ ~'"Z_- ' g "z2 ~ 6 ~'~ '5) Gross Site Area (ac./sq. fl.).' -- / '5) ,%'et Si:'e Area (total site size minus area o/public streets & proposed dedications).' 7) Desc,ffbe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change w,hich would affect the project site (attach additional s,ffeet if necessany: Include a description of all permits which ,,viii be necessany from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project.' I;.~ITST©i.'.,VPD - 4/~6 Page 2 of 10 Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soft stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, site all sources of information (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeotogical surveys, traffic studies): Desc,'?be the known cultural and/or histon'col aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books. published repoP, s and oral history): Describe any noise sources and their levels that no','/affect the si~e (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses.' h';i¥STD1 .V,/FD - 4/-35 Page 3 of 10 Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use which wN result from the prosed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development. the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Describe the surmund,"ng properies, including information on plants and animals and any cultural. histon'cai. or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential. commercial. etc.), intensity of land use (one.family, apa~ment houses. shops. deoa~ment stores, etc.) and scale of devetopment (height, L'ontage, s~,ba~,. rear yard, etc.).' WN the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? INITSTD *, .V./PO - 4/9::3 Page ~ of 10 Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of sound proofing are proposed? '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees.' 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains.' ,',':dica!e ..~:.o~.~.d amount of water o'sage. (S.~ ,.~,achm.,'~ ,~ for usage estimates). ,=or fu~her clan',fication. please contact t,he Cuca,,monga Count>' Water District at ~$7-25~ I. a. Residential (gallday) Peak use (gallDay) b. Commercial/ind. (ga//day/ac) / '~"~ o d-~,'~-/~h,. /.gr., Pea.~ use (gal/min/ac) / I'~ezcat,~ propos,~d m~tnod of s,=wag,~ d~sposal ~p,~c ~ an*( Sew,~r If setzc tank r ," ~ ~ - ' ~ ~ ' . ~- " - ' ~ ~ . p ' s a e propos~d, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitar7 sewage system is proposed ~ndicat,~ exp,~ct,~d daily sewag,~ g,~neration' (S,~,~ A~achment A for usase ~ " ~s,~ma,.s). For futt,~er clarification, please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 9~7-2591. a. Residential (gallday) '-/:C~" '~ , ~ / .. / b. Commercial/Ind. (~a;/day/ac) / ~-~ ('~1~---- / fb/,,'~ / I'r"-'~ , / , RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS.' 20) Number of residential ' ' U~ S. Detached (indicate range of p....~el sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size.' I,',~iTSTD1 .W'PD - "/96 Page 5 of 10 Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units).' 2~) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents.' Sale Price(s) $ Rent (per month) $ to $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type.' 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type.' 2~) Indicate the expected number of school children who v/if/be residing within the project.' Oistn'cts as shown in A~achment B: a. Elementary.' b. Junior High.' c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS Contact the appropn'ate School 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 25) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type.' IN[TSTO1.WP© - 4195 Page ,3 of 10 2?) 28) Number of employees.' Total.' ~ Maximum Shift.' Time of Maximum Shift.' 2~) Provide breakdown of anticipaled job classifications, including wage and salar/ ranges, as well as an indication of the rate o,; hire for each classification (a~ach additional sheet if necessan/).' / 30) £stimation of the number of v,'o~'ers to be hired that currently reside in the City.' '3 I) ,:or commercial and indus,'n'al uses only. indicate the source. type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data s,hou/d be ,.,e.'¥r?ed through the South Coast Air Quality Management Distn'ct. at ($15) 572-5253).' ALL PROJECTS 32) ~' ~ t,he water. sewer, fi~, and flood control agencies ser,,ing t,ffe project been contacted to ,~ ,~ ' ~ d~t~rm~n~ t,heir ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. INITSTD i .'.,V~ D - Pa~e 7 of 10 ~) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, so/vents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please fist the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use. if known. 34) ~/~II the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples fisted above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the apph'cation plans. zreby ce~ify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for =deq'..'a;e evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements. and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my know/edge and belief. I fu~her understand that additional in' , a~y be required to be submitted be~re an adequate evaluation can be made by the C~'ty of Rancho Cucamon~a. oa..'e.'C - n, ,' nature.' r ' [,'qlTSTDi .','.,;PO - "/--0-3 Page 8 of 10 ATTACHMENT A Water Usaqe Average use per day Residential Single Family Apt/Condo Commercial/Industrial General and Regional Commercial Neighborhood Commercial General Industrial Industrial Park Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2.0 600 gel/day 400 gel/day 3000 gaI/day/ac 1500 gal/day/ac 1500 gal/day/ac 3000 gal/day/ac Sewer Flows Residential SingIe Family Apt/Condos Sou;'ce: Commercial/Industrial General Commercial Neighborhood Commercial General Industrial Heavy Industrial Cucamonga Counb/Water District Master Plan, 9185 270 gel/day 200 ~cal/day 2000 gal/da'//ac 100-1500 gal/day/ac 2000 gal/day/ac 3000 gal/day/ac I,',;ITSTDi.¥/P©. 4/96 Page g o~ 10 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school distric~ for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F RanchoCucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 9457 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue RanchoCucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 RanchoCucamon§a, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 Wes.', 5th S~ree~ Ontario, CA 91752 (909) 988-8511 IN:TSTOt '.t../PD - ,~t96 Page 10 of 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-13 AND PARCEL MAP 15044 2. Related Files' GPA 96-01A - Wohl/Rancho Partners; DR 96-17 - Mimi's o 10. Description of Project: A request to develop a master plan for a retail shopping center consisting of design review for 116,394 square feet of leasable space on 11.75 acres of land and a subdivision of 11.75 acres into 11 parcels in the Community Commercial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 7), located between Spruce and Elm Avenues on the south side of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-352-63 through 69. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS; Peter Desforges; 2402 Michelson, Suite 170, Irvine, CA 92612. General Plan Designation: Community Commercial Zoning' Community Commercial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 7) Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: ZONING LAND USE .North: Community Commercial TVPC Retail Center South: Industrial Park ISP (Subarea 7) Vacant East: Industrial Park ISP (Subarea 7) Vacant West: Industrial Park ISP (Subarea 7) Restaurant Lead Agency Name and Address: City of RanchoCucamonga; Planning Division; 10500 Civic Center Drive; RanchoCucamonga, CA91730 Contact Perse~ and Phone Number: Miki Bratt, AICP, Associate Planner, (909) 477-2750 Other agencies whose approval is required: Caltrans Initial Study for CUP 97-13- Wohl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Population and Housing ( ) Geological Problems ( ) Water ( ) Air Quality ( ) Transpodation/Circulation ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Hazards ( ) Noise ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance ( ) Public Services ( ) Utilities and Service Systems ( ) Aesthetics ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based upon the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Signed: I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. ;~;' pAllaCnPner June 3, 1997 Initial Study for CUP 97-13- Wohl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal.' Potentially SignScant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigation SignificantNo IreDact IncorporatedImpact Impact a) Conflict with General Plan designation or ( ) zoning? Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? b) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? c) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? d) ( ) () (X) () ( ) ( ) (X) () () () (X) () () () (x) Comments: Project is consistent with the General Plan and the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the design is compatible with existing and planned land uses in the vicinity. S~gn~cant Impact Less Potenba;Iy Unless Than S gnificanlMJl~gahon Significant No POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal.' a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ) () () (x) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undevel~Y¢'ed area or extension of major infrastructure)? ) () () (x) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ) () () (x) Comments: Site is planned for Community Commercial use a d is vacant. Initial Study for CUP 97-13- Wohl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? b) Seismic ground shaking? c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? d) Seiche hazards? e) Landslides or mudflows? Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? h) Expansive soils? i) Unique geologic or physical features? Comments: h) Potentially Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigation Signif'm. ant [tooact tncor,;:)oraledIreDact No Imoact () () () () () () () () () () () ( () () ( () () ( () () () () () () () () () (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) Grading will be inspected by the Building and Safety Division for consistency with the Uniform Building Code Consistent with the Uniform Building Code, a soils report is required by the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of Grading permits. WAT E R. a) b) c) d) e) S,gnificant Irnpac~ Less PolentiallyUnless Than SignificantM~t~gation S~gn ~..a ntNO Will the proposal result in: Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ( ) ( ) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) ( ) Djscharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? ( ) ( ) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? ( ) ( ) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) ( ) ) (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) Initial Study for CUP 97-13- Wohl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? h) Impacts to groundwater quality? Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? Potentially Significant ImPact Potentially SignnScant Impact Less Unless Than Mitigation Significant IncorooratedImpa~ No Imoact ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: g) The drainage easement that crosses the site from north to south has been identified and incorporated into the plan of development. Issues and Suppor::r'g Irfforrnabon Sources AIR QUALITY. a) b) c) d) S~gn,ficant Impac~ Less Would the proposal: Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existin9 or projected air quality violation? ( ) ( ) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) ( Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) ( Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( () (x) () (x) ( ) (x) () (x) Comments' a) An air quality study was completed in conjunction with the Environmental Assessment for General Plan Amendment 96-01A and concluded there could be no impacts...-, Initial Study for CUP 97-13- Wohl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 o Issues and Supporting Information Sources: TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Rail or air traffic impacts? d) e) 0 g) Potentially Significent Imoact Potentially Significant Impact Less Unless Than Mitigation Sklnificant IncorooratedImoact Imoact ( ) ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ) () () (x) ) ( ) (x) ( ) ) () () (x) () () () () ) () (x) (x) Comments: a) Analysis for General Plan Amendment 96-01A indicated there would be no significant increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion as a result of retail development on this site. d) Parking is not allowed off-site on any public streets abutting the project. The Development Code requires adequate on-site parking as a condition of approval. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. result in impacts to.' a) b) c) Would the proposal Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats'(T'ncluding, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, Eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? Locally designated natural communities (e.g., Eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? Potentially Signrficent Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than S~gn~oant M~t+galion SignrficantNo freDact IncorporatedIm:::,act tmpac~ ( ) ( ) () (x) () ( ) () (x) () ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for CUP 97-13 - Wohl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Issues and Supporting Infon"nafion Sources: d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? Potentially Significant Potentially Sk:jnificanl impact Less Unless Than Mitigation Significant IncoroocatedImoact No Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) () (x) Comments: As stated in the Environmental Assessment for GPA 96-01A, the site has been rough graded for development at the time infrastructure improvements were made for the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park. Further, part of the site is covered with old vineyards. Therefore, there could be no wildlife or habitat impacts. o ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.' a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( ) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ( ) S,gnr~cant Impam Less PotenballyUnless Than S,gnr~ican[M,ligation SignificantNo Impact IncarpcraledImpact Impact () (x) () (x) () (x) Comments: a) The project will be consistent with adopted energy conservation ordinances and the requirements of the Uniform Building Code. Issues and Supporting Inform_.j~n Sources: HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Po[enbally S~gnificanI Impeel Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificanlM,t,gafion SignificantNO Imoacl Ir'cor~oratedIrnoac! Impeel ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) () ( ) (x) Initial Study for CUP 97-13 - Wohl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? Potentially Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigation SignificantNo Im12act IncorooratedImoacl Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments' No hazardous materials are expected to be sold or stored in the proposed retail center. 10. NOISE. Will the proposal result in.' a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Comments: None. S~gnr~cant Impact Less Potenhally Unless Than S~gn~can[ M,tigat~on Sigmrr~an! No () () () (x) () () () (x) 11. Issues and Supporting Ir~forrnatton Sources: PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas.' a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e) Other governmental services? Potentially S,c;nificanl Impact Less PotenballyUnless Than SignificantM~igatlon Sig n,'f~..~ ntNo Imoac! Incor'3orat edIm oa 6"tfmoa~ () ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) () (x) ( ) () () (x) () () () (x) Initial Study for CUP 97-13 - Wohl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Comments: As stated in the Environmental Assessment for GPA 96-01A, the area is urbanized and public services are existing. 12. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations to the following utilities.' a) b) c) d) e) 0 g) Power or natural gas? Communication systems? Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? Solid waste disposal? Local or regional water supplies? Comments: Potentially Significant Impact Less PolentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigation SignificantNo Imoact Incorporatedlinoart Impact ) () ) () ) () ) () ( () () ( () () ( () () () The area is urbanized and infrastructure is in place for development. (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) (x) 13. Significant Impact Less Than Signif'cant impact No Imc, act AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? () ( () (x) b) c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? Create li~t or glare? () ( () ( (x) (x) () () Comments: b) Development will be designed and/or conditioned to be compatible with surrounding existing uses, including the adjoining hotel and planned development on the south side of Eucalyptus Street. c) Exterior lighting for the site will be consistent with requirements of the Development Initial Study for CUP 97-13- Wohl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 14. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Impact Lass PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigalion SignificantNo Imoact IncorooratedImpact Impact CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.' a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) c) Affect historical or cultural resources? ( ) ( ) () (x) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) () () (x) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? () () () (x) Comments: As stated in the Environmental Assessment for GPA 96-01A, the site is part of the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Master Plan of Development. The site has been rough graded and street improvements, including public utilities, have been installed. No know cultural resources exist on the site. 15. Si~n~cant impact Less Significant M~t,gatlonSi~n~cantNO RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? () () () (x) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) ( ) () (x) Comments: Commercial recreation is a permitted use on the site; therefore, recreational opportunities could be increased as a result of commercial development. Initial Study for CUP 97-13- Wohl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 16. Issues ar~ Supporting Info,'marion Sources: Potentially Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigation SignificantNo Imoact IncorporatedIrrt:~act Impact c) d) MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ( b) Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) ( Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) ( Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ( ( ) () (x) () () (x) ( ) ( ) (x) () () (x) EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D)_,~he effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (x) General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981) Initial Study for CUP 97-13- Wohl City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 (x) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (x) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (x) Environmental Assessment for General Plan Amendment 96-01A, determined May 1, 1996. City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 2~092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: CUP 97-13/PM 15044 Public Review Period Closes: August 27, 1997 Project Name: Project Applicant: WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS Project Location (also see attached map): Located between Spruce and Elm Avenues on the south side of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-352-63 through 69. Project Description: A request to develop a master plan for a retail shopping center consisting of design review for 112,300 square feet of leasable space and a subdivision of 11.75 acres into 11 parcels on 11.75 acres of land under the Community Commercial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 7). FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. Auqust 27, 1997 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-13 FOR A MASTER PLAN FOR A RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WITHIN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION OF SUBAREA 7 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-352-63 THROUGH 69. A. Recitals. 1. Wohl/Rancho Padners has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 97-13, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of August 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headrig on August 27, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located between Spruce and Elm Avenues on the south side of Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of approximately 1,451 feet and lot depth of approximately 390 feet and is presently improved with a Mimi's Restaurant on 2.41 acres with 11.75 acres vacant; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with a shopping center in the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, the property to the south is designated Industrial Park and a portion is developed with a hotel and a portion is vacant, the property to the east is vacant and designated Industrial Park, and a portion of the property to the west is developed witb,.a restaurant and is designated Industrial Park; and c. The application proposes construction of a retail shopping center of 112,300 square feet of leasable space and related parking facilities. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-13 - WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS August 27, 1997 Page 2 a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, furlher, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record asawhole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Division 1) Total leasable floor area shall not exceed 118,800 square feet including Mimi's restaurant (6,500 square feet). 2) Up to..,17,820 square feet of leasable space may be developed for restaurant use, including outdoor seating areas and the 6,500 square feet of the existing Mimi's restaurant. 3) All outdoor restaurant seating shall be identified and the square footage shall count toward the restaurant use allowance. 4) All outdoor restaurant seating space shall be assigned to individual tenants. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-13 - WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS August 27, 1997 Page 3 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) lO) 11) 12) 13) 14) 15) ' 16) 17) Each tenant improvement plan for food use shall include, but not be limited to the following: a) A site plan including a food user matrix indicating that 17,820 square feet is the total allowable for food use, the square footage allocated to each food user, and the square footage remaining for food use. b. A dimensioned floor plan indicating any outdoor eating area. A note on the floor plan where an outdoor eating area is indicated, stating the maximum number of moveable, outdoor tables and chairs allowed in the assigned space. In order to provide an attractive paseo and covered eating area through the central tower, the design shall include windows and door entries to adjoining businesses inside the central tower and be to the satisfaction of the City Planner. No drive-thru fast food business shall be permitted. Per the Development Code, 594 parMng spaces are required (5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of leasable area), 659 spaces are provided. High intensity uses such as beauty shop, barber shop, and nail shop as well as restaurants, shall be distributed so as to avoid parking conflicts. Pedestrian circulation shall include a walk adjacent to the east side of Major 4 and a walk adjacent to the west side of Major 1 and a minimum width of 5 feet for the sidewalks adjacent to the Foothill Boulevard entry driveway. Decorative paving shall mark major pedestrian pathways, including a path connecting the entrance of each major store to the parking lot across the east-west access drive and be to the satisfaction of the City Planner. River rock veneer shall be native rock and not manufactured rock. Revised plans for the final elevation design recommended by the Planning Commission shall be to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Upon installation, the leaf canopy of the courtyard palms shall provide a mi~r~um of 12-foot clearance above the finish level of the courtyard. The pattern of undulating berms along the Foothill Boulevard frontage established with Mimi's frontage improvements shall be continued. Landscape area shall be increased in the southeast parking area to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Tree wells and landscape fingers shall be incorporated into all parking areas per the Development Code to the satisfaction of the City Planner. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-13 - WOHL/RANCHO PARTNERS August 27, 1997 Page 4 18) Lighting Plan shall provide illumination for the tower elements to the satisfaction of the City Planner 19) The maximum number of signs permitted for any one tenant shall be three, including monument identification. 20)Business identification signs shall not be placed on the rear elevations of buildings. 21) Per Planning Commission Policy, public art shall be incorporated into the center to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Engineerinq Division 1) Tentative Parcel Map 15044 shall be processed concurrently with this application and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. 2) The existing street plans (City Drawing No. 404) shall be revised to reflect the proposed improvements. 3) All frontages shall be posted "No Parking." 4) Elm and White Oak Avenues shall be re-striped to include two-way left turn lanes. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretaw.~..of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Com~nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of August 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CON DITIONS PROJECT#: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Conditional Use Permit 97-13 Foothill Courtyards Wohl/Rancho Partners South side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce and Elm Avenues ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Time Limits 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. Completion Date / / B. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for _City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. SC - 5/97 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. Shopping Centers 1. A uniform hardscape and stree[ furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Division review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the City Planner: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll-up doors. e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. only. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. Project No. CUP 97-13 Completion Date / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / SC - '3/97 Project No. CUP 97-13 Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: Completion Date / / Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. / / Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to the hotel. I / Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Division approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / 10. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. / / 11. The design of store fronts shall compliment the architectural program and shall have subtle variations subject to Design Review Committee approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / 12. All future projects within the shopping center shall be designed to be compatible and consistent with the architectural program established. 13. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 14. If shopping cads are used by tenant, cart corrals shall be provided for temporaw storage. No permanent outdoor storage of shopping carts shall be permitted unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. The shopping carts shall be collected and stored at the approved designated place at the end of each work day. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect major buildings with parking areas. / / / / / All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. SC - 3 Project No. CUP 97-13 Completion Date Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. / / Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent. The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are provided, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3-bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0.5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher whole number. / / Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. A minimum of 30% of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Foothill Boulevard. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. / / Tree maintenance crit.e,,r, ia shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. / / Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. / / SC - 6~97 4 Project No. CUP 97-13 Completion Date Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. / / A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Commission review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. / / Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H, Site Development The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. I. Grading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. SC - 5 AsP Project No. CUP 97-13 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Dedication and Vehicular Access go Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. If curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. K. Street Improvements Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Foothill Blvd. C X X X Elm Avenue X X X X Eucalyptus Street X X X X Comm Median Bike Other Trail Island Trail / / / / SC - 6/97 Improvement Plans and Construction: Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, ol~ny other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. Project No. CUP 97.13 Comoletion Date e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City __/__/__ Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with __/__/__ adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. __/__/__ Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. / / Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. / / A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way: Foothill Boulevard. Public Maintenance Areas / / A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. M, Drainage and Flood Control Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable 'IV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. / / / / SC - 6197 Project No. CUP 97-13 General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. Com131etion Date / / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: P. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. 2. Fire flow requirement shall be 3,000 gallons per minute. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporaW water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection. 7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. Sprinkler system monitoring shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion of sprinkler system. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. X California Code Regulations Title 24. I / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / SC - 6,'97 8 Project No. CUP 97-13 10. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: X All roadways. X Other: Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. 11. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. 12. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear of obstructions at all times, during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. 13. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so as not to impede fire apparatus. 14. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 15. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for the proper form Fetter. 16. Plan check fees in the amount of :SO have been paid. An additional $645.00 shall be paid: X Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 17. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 U BC, U FC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. Completion Date / / / / / / / / / / / / / / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common. and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. R. Security Hardware- 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. SC - 9 Project No. CUP 97-13 Coml~letion Date 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, or alarmed. S. Security Fencing / / / / To When utilizing security gates, a Knox box sub-master system security device shall be used since fire and law enforcement can access these devices. Windows / / All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be lifted from frame or track in any manner. 2. Store front windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. U. Building Numbering Vo Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. / / At the entrances of complex, an illuminated map or directory of project shall be erected with vandal-resistant cover. The directory shall not contain names of tenants, but only address numbers, street names, and their locations in the complex. North shall be at the top and so indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Division. All developments shall submit a 8 1/2" x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi-tenant developments to the Police Department. Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. SC - 5/97 10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: August 27, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission, Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Maria E. Perez, Assistant Engineer ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15044 - WHOL/RANCHO PARTNERS - A subdivision of 11.75 acres of land into I1 parcels in the Community Commercial designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 7), located between Spruce and Elm Avenues on the south side of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-352-63 through 69. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Related File: Conditional Use Permit 97-13. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on Exhibit Surrounding General Plan Designations and Zoning: Community Commercial (Subarea 7 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan). Surrounding Land Use: North - Community Commercial South - Industrial East - Industrial West - Industrial Site Characteristics: The property is situated on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue. The property is mostly vacant with Mimi's Cafe having been recently constructed on proposed parcel 1. Analysis:- The parcel map will reconfigure the existing eight parcels to support a community commercial use. Parcel 1 is currently developed with a 6500 square foot restaurant building. The applicant is proposing to phase improvements for the remaining parcels. Phasing of public improvements will occur with respect to the parcels being developed. ITEM B Fo Environmental Review: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study. Part II of the Initial Study has been completed in conjunction with related file CUP 97-13. No adverse impacts upon the environment are anticipated as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of Negative Declaration is appropriate. Correspondence: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Posting at the site has also been completed. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the Tentative Parcel Map 15044. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Dan James ~ Senior Civil Engineer Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Map Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval ._J I I I Z It HIGH[ AND RA.'::; Fl. INi FOOTHIt I ARROW PROJiUCT SITE 4TH STREET I I AV~NU£ Z 8LVO' ELM AVENUE AVENUE ROUTE I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~INEERING DIVISION ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map TPM 15044 "A" - .~ ~ .~; :~-..~,:~.:.- ~...~_..... ~ _ .~ - . ~ ..... ,~ ~ _-~~__~~ , ~, ,~ ~l .( · ' ~. ~'-' .,' '1 ..... · ..... ' ~ h~ ' I ~ .....~ / 1 · I ~-,.~ ' ~ ...... :~t~PARCEL'I.:W~5~ PARCEL9 q "..¢', , , rq4 - I'ARCEL6 ..... : ./ PARCELll ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ .. . ....... · ~ ::. ,,,) ~ ~' .. ..... .. .,,~.~,..~.~ ,.. ~ .... .... PARCEL 2 '~ :-. ~ ...... PARCEL 3 --. - PARCEL 8 ~'-' .D, · ~ 4 ~:. '~'. .... :2'.. - '~' ' ' .... :.1[ ' ~.';','.,:.: ....~.. ,~. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON(~A ENGINEERING DIVISION ITEM: Tentative Map TITLE: TPM 15044 EXHIBIT: "B" RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15044, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN SPRUCE AVENUE AND ELM AVENUE, APN: 208-352-63 THROUGH 69 WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 15044, submitted by Wohl/Rancho Padners, applicants, for the purpose of subdividing into 11 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN: 208-352-63 through 69, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue; and WHEREAS, on August 27, 1997 the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: That the map is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral repods included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the indel:z~dent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15044 - WHOL/RANCHO PARTNERS August 27, 1997 Page 2 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. This Commission finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and furlher, this Commission hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 15044 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: Engineering Division Additional street lights on Foothill Boulevard, Elm Avenue, and Eucalyptus Avenue shall be provided in accordance with current City Standards. Restripe Elm Avenue to 300 feet south of Eucalyptus Avenue, Eucalyptus Avenue from White Oak Avenue to Elm Avenue, and White Oak Avenue from 300 feet west of Spruce Avenue to 300 feet east of Eucalyptus Avenue to include two-way left turn lanes. The non-vehicular access restriction on Foothill Boulevard shall be vacated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The Parcel Map shall be processed concurrent with Conditional Use Permit 97-13. 5. All street frontages shall be posted "No Parking." A dedicated right-turn pocket shall be constructed for the main entry driveway on Foothill Boulevard. Upon development of Parcels 6, 7, 9, or 10, Foothill Boulevard shall be com~ted from the easterly property line of Parcel 10 to Spruce Avenue. o Upon development of Parcel 5 or 11, Elm Avenue shall be completed from Foothill Boulevard to south of the Elm Avenue driveway and Foothill Boulevard shall be completed from Elm Avenue to the easterly property line of Parcel 10. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15044- WHOL/RANCHO PARTNERS August 27, 1997 Page 3 10. Upon development of Parcel 3, 4, or 8, full public improvements for the entire parcel map shall be completed. Upon development of Parcel 2, Eucalyptus Avenue fronting Parcel 2 shall be completed. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF AUGUST 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman AT-TEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of August 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. I ~"D4 4-- Those items checked are Conditions or Approval. A. Dedications and Vehicular Access Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community. trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way for the perimeter streets (measured From street centeriine): total feet on total feet on total feet on total feet on An irrevocable offer of dedication for roadway purposes shal be made for the private streets. 4. Comer properly line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 5. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets. except for approved openings: Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by C C & R's or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the final parcel map. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by C C & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the final parcel map. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the final parcel map per the City Engineer's requirements. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside tire public right-of-way sirall be dedicated to the City. 10. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final parcel map. II. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a niinimum of 7 fcct ~,,casur~.d fro., the f~c of curbs. If,.u,b adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn Inn,. n p~rallel ~trc:~tr~¢ca~cmcntshallbcprovidcd. ~ q~ ~/~V~CDo~ o~ ~ 12. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary. to construct the required public improvements and, if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days prior to submiaal of the final parcel map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide fdi' payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited, to: B. Street Improvements All public improvements, (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc. ) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. A minimum, of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40- foot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets. 3. Construct the following missing perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb AC Side- Drive Street & Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Gutter Street Comm. aledian Bike Other Trees Trail Island Trail Notes: (a) hlcdian Isl:md includes landscaping m~d in'igation oil meter. (b) I'avcmcnt reconstruction at~d overlays will bc determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk will be cur~'ilincar per STD. ~ 114. (d) If so m~ked. an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 2 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees, street lights and intersection safets.' lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submined to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the CiD' Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final parcel map approval. b. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shill be paid a'f{'cl a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, sweet name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary, streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Noles: (I) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets. a ma.,:imum ot'200 feet apart. unless othenvise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Condull shaII be 3-inch (at intersections), or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pullrope or ~ specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per CiD' Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewatk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to subminal for first plan check. 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the CiD' Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained From the CiD' Engineer's office in addition to any other permits required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15 - gallon size or larger shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the CiD"s street tree program. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger street, I'ines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. $. A Permit sha_,ll be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of building permits. C. Public Maintenance Areas I. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final parcel map approval. The following landscaped park',vays, medians, paseos? easements, trails, or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final pro'eel map approval. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the folio?ring street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification - Master Plan: Do Drainage and Flood Control 1. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone __ designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans. and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA. prior to final parcel map approval. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the CiD' Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 4. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of s'urface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 5. A permit From the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work xvithin it's right-of- way. 6. Trees are prohibited within 5 fcct oftItc outside diameter ofa~D' public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 7. Public stov.l drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of blockage in a sump catch basiwon a public street. 4 Eo I m provemen t Co m pielion 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the CiD' will be required for: 2. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed.tq:~- e. o rOW ~Oro~ Fo Utilities I. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of'compliance from CCWD is required prior to final parcel map approval. 3. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map ',','ill be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 4. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. General Reouirements and r~pprovals 1. The tentative map approval is valid for the 24 month period following the approval date. Time extensions may be granted by the Planning Commission, if requested prior to the expiration date. 2. Final grading plans for each parcel shall be as required by the Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading permits. 3. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (C C & R's) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to approval of the final parcel map. 4. An easement for a joint use drive~;,'ay sitall be provided prior to final parcel map approval for: 5. Prior to approval of the final parcel map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District , among the newly created parcels. 6. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs For all new street lights for the first 6 months of'operation, prior to finat parcel map approval. 7. Prior to f'malization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City, Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. 8. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees sirall be paid prior to final parcel map approval. '. -.... 9. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Prior to recordation of the final parcel map, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment ofa Mello-Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessars' school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Community Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the.alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory. of such existing district prior to tire recordation of the final parcel map. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final parcel map for said project, this cgndition sirall be deemed null and void. This condition shall be waived if the City. receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. 12. Mello Roos Communi .ty Facilities District requirements for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District shall apply to this project. 13. Pursuant to provisions of California Resources Code Section 21089(b), this application shall not be operative, vested or final, nor will building permits be issued or a map recorded, until (1) the Notice of Determination ('NOD) regarding the associated environmental action in filed and posted with Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino; and (2) any and att required handling charges, are paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino. The applicant shall provide the Engineering Department with a stamped and copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provision of the California Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for filing a Certificate of Fee Exemption, this condition shall be deemed null and void. Rev. 10/14/96 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: August 27, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer Jerry A. Dyer, Associate Engineer ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15027 - ANDERSON - A subdivision of 2.45 acres of land into 4 parcds in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Vicara Drive approximately 287 feet easterly of the intersection of Sapphire Avenue - APN: 1061-141-05. Staff has prepared an environmental Notice of Exemption for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of the proposed Tentative Parcel Map as shown on Ex.hibit "B" B. Surroundin~ General Plan Designations and Zoning: Single Family Residential, VeU, Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) C. Surrounding Land Use: North Single Family Residential, Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre South Single Family Residential, Very' Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre East Single Family Residential, Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre West - Single Family Residential, Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre Site Characteristics: The site adjoins Vicara Drive, a public street. The site is vacant and slopes approximately 2 - 3% to the south. No drainage courses are on-site. The surrounding area is improved with single family residences. ITEM C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15027 - ANDERSON August 27, 1997 Page 2 E. Analvsis: The parcel map will establish four lots to be developed with single family homes. Additional, a local equestrian trail will be dedicated and improved across the northerly portion of the lots upon development. Full frontage improvements will be completed for Vicara Drive across the site. Street Trees shall be deferred until development of the adjacent parcels (lots). F. Environmental Reviexv: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Environmental Study. Part II of the Initial Environmental Study is not required. Staff has concluded that the site is exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Categorical Exemptions, Section 15315, Class 15. Therefore, Staff has prepared an environmental Notice of Exemption for consideration. G. Correspondence: Notices of the Public Hearing have been sent to the surrounding property owners and placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Posting of the site has also been completed. H. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the Tentative Parcel Map 15027. If after such consideration, the Commission can recommend approval, then adoption of the attached Resolution and approval of the environmental Notice of Exemption would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Senior Civil Engineer DJ:JAD: Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Vicinity Map Exhibit 'B' - Tentative Map Environmental Notice of Exemption Resolution and Recommended Conditions of Approval VICINITY MAP ! : i ; ; ! ,,~' ........ ~..'&.~:.,~.L~ ......... · ' ! '! ~.7~'--/~'-'~'.'~:'-~-'~. '~]'t~'~.'~r~rw?.°°i SEE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC ~1.~7;~q ~:1 I / ,.J I .......~ ~ L ~'"'T ........: ....~-~' ~ ~ ~ ~ I ..~1 ......L ~ ~ ..........:'~-:~:: ~" I ~ .' ....... ' ~ ..~ .....~'~ .... : ~/ ......,I , .-' ] I : -~- · , .... ~ ......~ ~ ~I t~: .......... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BEI~NARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ITEM: TITLE: EXHIBIT: Vicinit)' Map TPM 15027 TENTATIVE PARCEL. MAP NO. 15027 I~T ~ CITY OF BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL ~O.2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5.342. AS RECORDED IN BOOK ,33 OF PARCEL MAPS. PJ,.,,0ES 6t AND 62. RECORpS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. CALIFOR,,IIA t~ ......-i ~ ......i~; .......-'"-7 .... i{ PMiC[L 2 '~ PA.qC[L 3~ ' P~IC[L 4 OWNERS / APPLICANTS (909) 91~9-4425 SURVEYOR PARCEL INFORMATION Woler ~sUicl (7) ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER ITEM: Tentative Map TITLE: TPM 15027 EXHIBIT: "B" APPENDIX E NOTICE OF EXEMPTION Secretary for Resources 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 Sacramento, California 95814 FROM: City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 X Clerk of the Board Attention: San Bernardino County Auditor/Controller-Recorder 222 W'. Hospitality Lane San Bernardino, CA 92415-0018 Engineering Division Tentative Parcel ~9[at~ No. 15027 Project Title North side of Vicara Drive approxirnatel. v 28795. easterly of the intersection qf Sapphire Avent~e Project Location - Specific Rancho Cztcarnonga Project Location - City San Bernardino Project Location - County A sttbdivision of 2.45 acres of land into 4 parcels to be developed ~vith single farni[.v homes. Description of Nature, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project City 2f Rancha C~carnonga Name of Public Agency Approving Project Citr' qf Rancho Cttcamonga Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project Exempt Status: (Check One) X Ministerial (Sec. 15073) Declared Emergency (Sec. 15071 (a)) Emergency Project (Sec. 15071 (b) and (c)) Categorical Exemption. State type and section number. California Environmental Oz~ali(v .4or, Section 15315, Class 1_5 Reasons why project is exempt: ~Ierr¥ A. Dyer [909) 477-2740 23/7 Contact Person Area Code Telephone Extension If filed by appl_icantr-'""" 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a notice off exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? Yes__ No~ Date Received for Filing Signature Title RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15027, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VICARA DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 287 FEET EASTERLY OF THE INTERSECTION OF SAPPHIRE AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1061-141-05. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 15027, submitted by Don J. and Betty J. Anderson, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing into 4 parcels, the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, identified as APN: 1061-141-05, located on the north side of Vicara Drive approximately 287 feet easterly of the intersection of Sapphire Avenue; and WHEREAS, on August 27, 1997, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described map. NOW THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made. 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems or have adverse effects on abutting properties. SECTION 2: Based upon the facts and information of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Planning Commission can approve the environmental Notice of Exemption based upon the findings as follow: That the site is exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Categorical Exemptions, Section 15315, Class 15, which states the following: Consists of the division of property in urbanized areas ..Z.,oned for residential, commercial, or industrial use into four or fewer parcels when the division is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 15027- ANDERSON August 27, 1997 Page 2 SECTION 3: Tentative Parcel Map Number 15027 is hereby approved subject to the attached Standard Conditions and the following Special Conditions: Engineering Division: Full frontage improvements shall be completed across the site. Street trees shall be deferred until development of the adjacent proposed parcel(s). Refer to the Standard Conditions for requirements. A 30 foot Offer of Dedication exists for the nodherly podion of Vicara Drive across the site; however, this map will be required to dedicate the easement. The "Easement Dedication" will be to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for "Streets, Highways and Related Purposes." Refer to the Standard Conditions for requirements. Planning Division: 1. Each lot is subject to Design Review, pursuant to the Hillside Development procedures, when development is proposed. Building and Safety Division: Provide additional fire hydrants as per the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance No. 22 and fire hydrant standards. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY AUGUST 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoin. g.~Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of August 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Those A. TENTATIVE PARCEL M_AP NO. items checked are Conditionsof Approval. Dedications and Vehicular Access CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDAJU) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 15'0 7 1. R/ghts-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the CiL'y for all interior public streets, communiLy trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance and public drabage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans ancL,'or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way for the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 30 tota feet onVIF-AI A tota[ feet on total feet on total feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of'dedication for roadway purposes shall be made for the private streets. 4. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per Cid' Standards. 5. Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the CiD' for the following streets, except for approved openings: Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by C C & R's or by deeds and shall be recorded prior to or concurrent with the final parcel map. Reciprocal parking agreements for a[l parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by C C & R's or deeds and shatl be recorded prior to or concurrent with the final parcel map. All existing easements lying within future right-of-way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the finat parcel map per the City Engineer's requirements. 9. Easements for public sidewalks ancL,'or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 10. Privb_te drainage easements for crossdot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final parcel map. fl. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn Ianes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the faceof curbs. [fcurb adjacent sidewalk is used along ther[ghtturnIane, aparaIlel street free easement shalI be provided. 12. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessaO' to construct the required public improvements and, if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall at least 120 days prior to submittal of the f'mal parcel map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such time as the CiD' acquires the propert?.' interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City, to acquire the off-site property. interests requ~ed in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited, to: Street fmprovements All punic improvements, (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc. ) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gu~er, AC pavement, drive approaches, side'.v2!ks, street lights, and street trees. A rain!mum, of 26-foot wide pavement within a 40- foot wide dedicaled right-of-way shall be cons~',~cted For al! half-section streets. 3. Consr."'::: the following missinc perireciter street improvements including, but not limited Street ,";am e Curb AC Side- Dri',e Street Street Comm. ,Median Bike Z: Pvmt ~alk Appr. Lights Trees Trail lslmqd Trail Gutter V 1 CAg:/~, "brt, v." ,," Other Noles: (a) \' "' · .:,:2n Island includes. landscaping a,qd irrigation on me;er. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays :,,'ill bc determined d:::ing plan check. (c) Ifsomarked. sidewalkwi!lbeeur','ilinearperSTD."114. (d) Ifsom~ked. anin-[ieu of construction fee s,h..~ be provided ;'or ~his kern. 2 _~ 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans including street =ees, street lights and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City, Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the CiD' Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to fLnal parcel map approval. b. Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City, Engineer's office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Puil boxes shall be placed on both sides of t,~e sweet at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections znd No. 3 along streets. a maximum o(200 :':e', apart, unless otherwise spe:if~ed by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be S-inch (at intersections). or 2-inch (along str:et~) galvanized steel with pullrope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be instalI.~d on all comers of intersections per Ci.ty Standards or as directed by the City. Engineer. f. Existing CiD' roads requiring construction shalI remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during const'ruction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shalt be refunded upon completion of'the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewaik drains sha!l be installed to Ciq,' Standards, except for single finrail?' residenlial lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submiual For first plan check. 5. Stree~ improvement plans per CiD' Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by' the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the CiD' Engineer's office in addition to any other permits required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15 - gallon size or larger shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger street, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plowed as required. 8. A Permit sh"~ be obtained from CALTP,..A. NS ~'or any work within the following right-of-way: 9. All public improvements on the foliosring stre.-ts shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance o~ building pe,,-mits. .3 Go Public b'laintenance Areas I. A separate set of landscape and h'Tigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final parcel map approval. The following landscaped park'ways, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shaII be filed with the City Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public Iandscap[ng and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautiflcation Master Plan: Drainao_e and Flood Control I. The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. 2. [t shall be the developer's responsibility' to have the current FIRhi Zone__ designation removed from the project area. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic[hydraulic caIculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA, prior to final parceI map approval. A Letter of*lap Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 3. A final drainage study shall be submined to and approved by the Ci.ty Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the CiD' Engineer. 4. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 5. A pe,wnit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within it's right-of- way. 6. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter ofany public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trun',-:. 7. PuNic storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event ofblockage in a sump catch basin on a public street. 4 Improvement Completion 1. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the f'mal parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an a~eement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: ALL. 'P~JBL~ c l~'plZ. o~/~:,,~l.~T'.X ~Xc~rP-r' TI-I.~ 2. if the requLred public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the f'mal parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development for: Utilities 1. Provide separate utili .ty services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. \Valet and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga Count.-,, Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of'compliance from CCW'D is required prior to final parcel map approval. 3. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that ma.v be received from them. 4. The developer shall be responsible for the reIocation of existing utilities as necessar?'. General Requiremen~sand Approvals 1. The tentative map approval is valid for the 24 month period following the approval date. Time extensions may be granted by the Planning Commission, if requested prior to the expiration date. 2. Final grading plans for each parcel shall be as required by the Building and Safety. Division prior to issuance of grading perTnits. 3. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (C C & R's) approved by the City. Attorney is required prior to approval of the final parcel map. 4. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final parcel map approval for: 5. Prior:to approval of the final parcel map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District , among the newly created parcels. 6. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first 6 months of'operation, prior to final parcel map approval. 5 7. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient hnprovement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the Ci~ Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. 8. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Plan Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to f'mal pa'rcel map approval. 9. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way. I0. A si~ed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement CommuniLy Facilities Dis~ict shall be filed with the City. Engineer prior to final parcel map approval. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. I I. Prior to recordation of the final parcel map, the applicant shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment ofa Melto-Roos Community Facilities Dis=let for the construction and maintenance of necessao' school facilities. However, if any school district has previously established such a Communio' Facilities District, the applicant shall, in 'd~e.alternative, consent to the annexation of the project site into the territory. o( such existkng district prior to the recordation of the final parcel map. Further, if the affected school district has not formed a Mello-Roos CommuniD' Facilities Dis=let within ~velve months from the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final parcel map for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. This condition shall be waived if the CiD' receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately 2ccommodate an)' and all school impacts as a result of this project. 12. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District shall apply to this project. t3. Pursuant to provisions of California Resources Code Section 21059(b), this application shalI not be operative, vested or final, nor will building pe,,'-mits be issued or a map recorded, until (I) the Notice of Determination (NOD) regarding the associated environmental action in filed and posted with Clerk of the Board of Super-visors of the Coun .t.t.ty of San Bernardino; and (2) any and all required handling charges, are paid to the County. Clerk of the CourtD' of San Bernardino, The a~plicant shall provide the En=In~rmo Depar-m~ent with a stamped ap, d copy of the NOD together with a receipt showing that all fees have been paid. In the event this application is determined exempt from such filing fees pursuant to the provision of the California Code, or the guidelines promulgated thereunder, except for payment of any required handling charge for fiiing a Certificate of' Fee Exemption, this condition shalt be deemed null and void. Rev. 10/I4/96 6