No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997/12/10 - Agenda PacketCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 10, 1997 Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chamber 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Chairman Barker Vice Chairman McNiel Commissioner Bethel __ Commissioner Macias __ Commissioner Tolstoy __ II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 22, 1997, Adjourned Meeting November 12, 1997 November 12, 1997, Adjourned Meeting IV. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-21 (DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15796) - CITATION HOMES - The design review of the detailed site plan and building elevations for a previously approved tentative subdivision map consisting of 94 single family lots on 18 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-011-17. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-22 (DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15797) - CITATION HOMES -The design review of the detailed site plan and building elevations for a previously approved tentative subdivision map consisting of 61 single family lots on 12.4 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Kenyon Way and east of Woodruff Place - APN: 227-011-26. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-11 - FINAL SCORE- A request to expand the existing bar and restaurant with entertainment by adding approximately 1,400 square feet of outdoor seating area, in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8411 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207-571-75. Related file: Entertainment Permit 93-03. (Continued from November 11, 1997) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 93-03 MODIFICATION - FINAL SCORE - A request to expand the days and hours of entertainment and add dancing for an existing bar and restaurant with outdoor seating area, in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8411 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207-571-75. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 97-11. (Continued from November 11, 1997) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-38 - DESPERADO'S - A request to establish a bar in conjunction with a restaurant that offers entertainment within Thomas Winery Plaza, in the Special Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 208-101-23. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 97-27. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 97-04 - DESPERADO'S - A request to offer entertainment consisting of dancing, disc jockeys, concerts, and live bands in conjunction with a bar and restaurant within the Thomas Winery Plaza, in the Special Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard APN: 208-101-23. Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND~GONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-27 - NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS;, INC. - A request to construct a cellular transmitter facility which is not staffed, including a 60 foot monopole and a 120 square foot equipment shelter within a 1,600-square foot leased area located on a 55.86 acre parcel north of Arrow Highway and west of Etiwanda Avenue in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan - APN: 229- 032-24. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 97-38. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-23 - BUQUET (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to establish a night club and sports bar, including entertainment, D.J. music, dancing, satellite television, amusement devices (pool tables, dart boards), and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages within an existing 7,930 square foot building in the Community Commercial designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1077-601-07. Related file: Entertainment Permit 97-02 (also Conditional Use Permit 94-08 and Entertainment Permit 94-01 previously approved). ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 97-02 - BUQUET (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to allow entertainment including, but not limited to, D.J. music, dancing, satellite television, and amusement devices (pool tables, dart boards) in conjunction with a bar and restaurant in the Community Commercial designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 1077-601-07. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 97-23 (also Conditional Use Permit 94-08 and Entertainment Permit 94-01 previously approved). Vl. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS CONSIDERATION OF RELOCATION FOR PUBLIC ART WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PROMENADE SHOPPING CENTER - A request to reconsider the required locations for two pieces of public art within the Terra Vista Promenade Shopping Center, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue APN: 227-151-38 through 50. Project File: Conditional Use Permit 95-11. PATIO FURNITURE IN TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER -RUBIO'S BAJA GRILL/LEWIS HOMES - A request to consider a corporate design, thatched (palapas) style, of outdoor patio umbrellas for a 2,200 square foot restaurant in a multi-tenant pad building, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Aspen Drive and west of Montgomery Wards - APN: 1077-421-76. Page 3 VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS L. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE UPDATE (Oral report) ELECTION OF OFFICERS - For discussion and possible action IX. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 1 l:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. I, Gall Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 4, 1997, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at ~0500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. Page 4 VICINITY MAP , ...... ........-........................ ..........-.-........................................ ........· · · .:.............:...........-........................ ............... ..-............................, .'.'. ............... :.:.:.:-:.'..'.'-'.'.'.'.' ........ : ............ 2...2...'.'-'.'. · e.' ............ : ......... :-:.: ....'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' .......2'2':'2-:-:-:-~ ....:.:, f"" """1'. .......... '..'..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.':'.':': ......: ................. :.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.':'X':'.,-, · ........ : ........ '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.-.-:':.: ................. '.'.'.'.'.'.-.'.'.-.-.'.'., !/ '"'"" ......................................................... .......: ................................... .................:.......................,....,... .............: .... ~..........:.~.:~:.:.:.:~:.:~~.:~:~~.~.~............~.~.~~...~.......~:.~.~~~~...~..:.:.:.~~:.:.:.:.:.~.~.:~:.:~:.....~................~.~.~.~.:~~.:.:.~.~.:.:.:.:.:.:.~. .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'-'.'.'-'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.':':':':-:.X-:-'-'.' .'.'.'. · I-- --' '--' '-.~..'-- ............ .'.'. ................. :.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. ............... .~ >~'.'.'.' · I! '"""'"'" .................: .......~.............,..........,....,..... ., ..... C ~ I.'.'.'.'.--. ................ .---',,i,~ ~,~'.'.'.-.-.................-...--.'.1 ...:.J I Wil~3n ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Lemon ': ':':i~!:~,1 o @ o e V~ I I A.T.& S.F. RR Xt~,11 CITY HALL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: December 10, 1997 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-21 (DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15796) - CITATION HOMES - The design review of the detailed site plan and building elevations for a previously approved tentative subdivision map consisting of 94 single family lots on 18 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-011-17. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is bounded by a neighborhood commercial shopping center to the north, a neighborhood park on a portion of the east side, and single family residential development in all other directions. A pedestrian trail exists along the east side of the subdivision. Victoria Park Lane, which exists along the southern border of the tract, has been developed and includes an expanded right-of-way for a linear park. The site is currently in the process of being rough graded and retaining walls constructed per the approved rough Grading Plan approved in conjunction with the subdivision. ANALYSIS: General: The applicant is proposing to develop the 94 lot subdivision with houses that range in size from 2,180 to 2,551 square feet on lots that range in size from 5,000 to 11,304 square feet and average approximately 6,210 square feet. Three house models are proposed to be offered, all of which are two-story and have two-car garages facing the streets (all three plans have an option of a third car tandem garage space or additional liveable area inside the house). Three exterior elevation styles are proposed for each model. A sound attenuation wall along Milliken Avenue will be provided per the recommendations of the acoustical analysis prepared in conjunction with this project. All perimeter walls will be designed consistent with the Victoria theme walls established in the area. A fully landscaped and lighted paseo connection to the trail to the east and the trail along Victoria Park Lane have been designed to connect this subdivision to the Victoria trail system. The model homes for this project as well as the related Tract 15797 are proposed on this subdivision at the southern terminus and along the west side of Summerstone Court. ITEM A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 97-21 - CITATION HOMES December 10, 1997 Page 2 Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on two separate occasions, most recently on November 18, 1997. The Committee (Bethel, Macias, Coleman) recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission once the Committee's comments were addressed to the satisfaction of staff. Staff met with the applicant on two separate occasions following the last Design Review Committee meeting and found the revised plans to be acceptable for action by the Planning Commission. Please refer to the attached Design Review Committee action comments from both meetings for issues that were discussed and recommended Committee revisions (Exhibit "F"). Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the project on two separate occasions, most recently on November 18, 1997, and determined that, with the recommended conditions of approval contained in the attached resolution of approval, the project is in compliance with all applicable City Standards and Design Policies. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 97-21, the Design Review for Tentative Tract 15796, through adoption of the attached resolution of approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Brld Bull~ City Planner BB:SH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Site Utilization Map Site Plan/Grading Plan Landscape Plan Building Elevations Floor Plans Design Review Committee Action Comments dated October 14 and November 18, 1997 Resolution of Approval with Conditions EXTENS',ON ._~T~ PLANNIN< ~'.'F, ~-¥ PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITY ;~ .,~ VILLAGE ~ .... ___ 4-8 DU/AC. ~ co ,,iMERCiAL M 8-14 I/AC. NCT- 1.30 7 SITE ARK ~ITE 1302.2 · EA ,RY: PHASE 3 ~ KENYON /~'A ~,~, CONSTRt.~TK)N "'-- ~ ~ PHASE 2 · ~ .... .~,,. __ - _ £_' IN THE CITY OF RANCJiO CUCAMONGA TENTATIV[ TRACT 15796 PLOT PLAN AND PHA$1NO PHASE I AV[HU[ C ON~.~TRUCTJON UILLIK[H AVI[ NU[ PHASE 6 PHASE 5 BUILD-OUT - ' ~' I i ! I' l~I~llls IJlrf! ~'llI'~IIl~111r~ LL ' i z,,,~ ~ WALL LEGEND '- ~ -I- I0tt ]1~5 AllEA KENYON PA~K tRACt tt~ -'0 -0 0 ] "0 '0 '0 ,' -0 ~ ~0 ~0 -'I i ~ ' .... ,' ' ' .... ~ -- ~ S' CONC. WALKWAY /- , ' ' / ' AVE~E ', - ~ ~' o~ c[~[~ / ~ PLANT MATERIALS L~GE~ WITH AN AUTOMAT~ ~R~AT~N SYSTEM. ~ ,~:: ....... , , ~ ~ ............. .® ALL LAt~)$C. APE AnEA$ THIS SHEET SIIALL OE I~ISTALLED WI~'H AN AUTOMATIC: t 4 m h IIIIIIIgIIIfiH hl~l[Ollillid --11 ~' RC- $500 TRACT ,~f~797 RANCHO CUCAMONGAt CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES toots, I~. IlIlllllllIIlllllllIhlllllllll ~ RC- 5500 TRACT Jt~797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CJTATJON HOMES ELF. VA'I ION 'IC RC - 5500 TRACT ~I75797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CADFORNfA CITATION HOMES IIIllJIIIIJIIIIBrlljlfllllilll ,~. RC- 5500 TRACT 315797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES LEFT $1D~ B ltlVAl'lQt~ REAR' ' ' RIr. J-ir MIE FJ.EVATION ~, IqJONlr RC- 5500 TRACT J!$797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HO/VlES ,'~7, w~mm t4ezmall~h Ard~ects, ~ ~,~,, ,,,,, - '' ~' TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 1~1" CITATION HOMES LLrr 9DI~ A ~LL.V^~IO~$ WEAR IIIIFllllJlllllfilllhllllllll{ ~ . RC- 5500 TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALICORNIA CITATION HOMES ,~, W~am Hem~alhalch Architects, REAR Q IIIIlIIlllhlllllllllllllllllll ~ ./ RC- 5500 TRACT ~15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOME[; J /l~,:leI-t~. & I~I hltllltllflllllllllJllllllltll RC- 5500 TRACT #15797 RANCHO CIJC^/vlONGA, CAUFORNIA CITATION HOMES Irllll Mtlilllllllllh iiiiIiitl ~/~/, PLAN 1 2 CAR GAP.,~E RC - 5500 TRACT #15796 R.ANCIltO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES A~chl~ecll, 0 o u 0 D- I, OW'~R lEVEL !104 .~.I:T. IIIJdllllllllllHIIIIJIIIIJI[11 RC- 5500 TRACT ~15796 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES 0 '1" Z 0 [_1 0 I!rlllllll hllllllllJllllllllll :~ PLAN 3 25~1SQ.F'T. 2 CAR RC- 5500 TRACT ~t5796 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES .~. W~lllam He~mmlha, Jch ~chllecls, k 7:50 p.m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS Steve Hayes October 14, 1997 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-21 (DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15796) - CITATION HOMES - The design review of the detailed site plan and building elevations for a previously approved tentative subdivision map consisting of 94 single family lots on 18 acres of land in the Low- Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-011-17. Design Parameters: The project site is bounded by a neighborhood commercial project to the north, a neighborhood park on a portion of the east side, and single family residential development in all other directions. A pedestrian trail exists along the east side of the project area. Victoria Park Lane, which exists along the southern border of the site, has been developed and includes an expanded width right-of-way for a linear park. No significant vegetation or natural features exist on the property. The site is currently in the process of being rough graded per the precise grading plan approved in conjunction with the subdivision. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues xvill be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Due to the ratio of lot size to the size of the footprints of the Series 5500 models of homes, staff would recommend that a greater number of the Series 5000 (the smaller) footprints be plotted on more of the smaller lots within the subdivision to provide a greater amount of usable (especially rear) yard area. Several of the lots backing Milliken Avenue do not meet the technical requirement of providing a minimum 45-foot building setback from the ultimate curb face along Milliken Avenue and others do not have the minimum 15-foot flat, usable rear yard area. All of the plans in the Series 5500 models have a very similar appearing rear elevation which, given the number of units that back on to public viewing areas, such as Milliken Avenue, could produce monotonous appearing rows of homes visible from public view. A house model with a varied roofline (perhaps gable ends on the front and rear elevations) could help resolve this concern. Additional upgrading of the side elevations on the Series 5500, Plans 2 and 3 should be discussed and provided to the satisfaction of the Design Review Committee. Secondam Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Commit-tee will discuss the folloxving secondary design issues: 1. More pilasters and varied wall setbacks should be provided along the Milliken Avenue frontage. Wherever possible, houses should be flipped in order to allow driveways to be grouped together to provide larger groupings of front yard areas on contiguous lots. Window mullions should be used on all full-size second story windows in addition to those already shown on the elevations. 4. Front porches should be enlarged on some models to make them usable. Where wood siding is proposed as an architectural treatment on the front elevations, it should also be use on the side and rear elevations, in areas such as under the ends of roof gable elements, to provide 360 degree architecture. DRC COMMENTS DR 97-21 - CITATION HOMES October 14, 1997 Page 2 o Additional architectural embellishments, such as additional window shutters, wood barges, clipped roof lines, etc, should be used to also help in providing a complete 360 degree architectural treatment on all elevations. Accent base treatments used on front elevations, such as rock, brick veneer, wood siding, etc., should be wrapped around on the garage side elevations to the point where it is anticipated the return wall will be constructed. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: Front yard setbacks should be varied to a greater extent, especially on long stretches of straight streets, to create more street scape variety. A minimum landscaped area of 5 feet should be provided between the back of sidewalk and walls in comer side yard situations. 'Wood siding should not be used on chimney stacks; a stucco or rock accent treatment should be provided. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee direct the applicant to make the appropriate design modifications and return to the Committee as a full item once the plans are revised to the satisfaction of staff. Design Review Committee Action' Members Present: Bill Bethel, Larry McNiel, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Steve Hayes The Design Review Committee did not recommend approval of the project as presented. The Committee recommended that the applicant to work with staff during the next three weeks in preparation for returning to the Committee as a full item on the next agenda. Items that should be addressed by the applicant are as follows: The Committee felt that there were several instances in the project where the proposed Series 5500 homes may be too large for the lots. The applicant should possibly plot some of the Plan 5000 series models on lots where setback constraints, such as the building setback along Milliken Avenue, or on lots with limited rear yard areas, in order to meet the required setbacks and/or provide the necessary yard areas. The Committee agreed with the applicant that the submitted Minor Exception could be justified for the lots backing onto the combination right turn lane/bus bay on Milliken Avenue and for some of the more constrained lots throughout the project. The required sound wall along Milliken Avenue should be designed consistent with the sound wall used along the Highland Avenue frontage for Tract 14121, immediately northsvest of the project. Pilaster spacing and details should be consistent with existing projects along Milliken Avenue. Vines should be used extensively along the outside of the wall to soften the appearance of the wall. DRC COMMENTS DR 97-21 - CITATION HOMES October 14, 1997 Page 3 In addition to the wood trim around all windows and attic vents, the side and rear elevations of all models should be upgraded by using accent elements such as, but not limited to, shutter details, potshelf details, clipped roof lines, window breakups and wood siding and barges under all gable ends (where applicable). Driveways should be grouped in twos to produce larger clusters of front yard areas wherever possible. Accent base treatments used on the front elevations should be wrapped around on the garage side elevations to the point where it is anticipated the return wall will be constructed. All above-referenced policy issues should be addressed by the applicant. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:40 p.m. Steve Hayes November 18, 1997 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-21 (DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15796) - CITATION HOMES - The design review of the detailed site plan and building elevations for a previously approved tentative subdivision map consisting of 94 single family lots on 18 acres of land in the Low- Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-011-17. Background: The Design Review Committee (Bethel, McNiel, Coleman) reviewed the project at their October 14, 1997 meeting, and recommended that the project return as a full item for further review of the Committee. Staff has attached the Design Review Committee Action Comments from that meeting for your convenience. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: At the time of comment preparation, revised plans reflecting the requested modifications had not yet been received. Staff will provide the Committee with an oral update at the meeting. Attachment: DRC Action Comments dated October 14, 1997 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Bill Bethel, Rich Macias, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Steve Hayes The Design Review Committee directed the applicant to continue to work with staff to address the following issues: To mitigate the similarities in form and bulk of the proposed homes, the following items should be incorporated into the exterior building elevations: a. Additional out lookers on gable ends, where applicable; b. Additional shutter details, where applicable, and window breakups in second story windows; c. Pop-outs or variations in the building plane; and Varying the roof systems to a greater extent so that a greater variety ofrooflines are exposed to public view (if this is accomplished successfully, then pop-outs in the building may not be required). The Committee recommended that the applicant not pursue a variance for those lots backing onto Milliken Avenue where the required building setbacks are not being met. However, the Committee could support the idea of allowing for Minor Exceptions in these areas given the grade differential between the pads and the street grade for Milliken Avenue and the need for a sound attenuation wall in this area, which will lessen the visibility of the homes from Milliken Avenue and counteract the concern of the reduced setback. However, if the re-plotting of the same units on the affected lots could not be restricted to the parameters of the Minor Exception, the different units would need to be plotted on these lots. DRC COMMENTS DR 97-21 - CITATION HOMES November 18, 1997 Page 2 The landscaping on both sides of the main entrance to the subdivision (on Spring Mist Drive) should incorporate numerous trees and a densely planted landscape palette, in accordance with City Standards. These comer side yard areas (from behind the back of sidewalk to the property line) should be added to the Landscape Maintenance District area for the project. 4. More variation in the design of the garage doors should be provided. o The recommendations of the Grading Committee regarding driveway grades should be addressed to the satisfaction of staff. Other previously referenced secondary and policy issues should be addressed to the satisfaction of the Committee. Once the above-referenced issues have been addressed to the satisfaction of staff', then the project can be scheduled for consideration of the Planning Commission. ., t7- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-21, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15796, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF THE DETAILED SITE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR AN APPROVED TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CONSISTING OF 94 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 18 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-011-17. A. Recitals. 1. Citation Homes has filed an application for Development Review 97-21, the Design Review of Tract No. 15796, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of December 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on December 10, 1997, including wdtten and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 97-21 - CITATION HOMES December 10, 1997 Page 2 Planning Division 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 11) 12) Additional architectural treatment, such as additional out lookers on gable ends, shutter details, window breakups, pop-outs or variations in roof designs shall be provided to provide additional architectural variation between the proposed houses, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Additional garage door variation shall be provided, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. A minimum of 15 feet of fiat, useable rear yard area shall be provided on each lot to the satisfaction of the City Planner. The landscape palette and the density of the landscape provided on the west side of the existing trail east of the subdivision and the paseo connection shall be similar to that already used on the east side of the trail, to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. All driveways shall be designed as not exceed a maximum slope of 10 percent, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Where wood siding is used as an accent treatment, it shall be wrapped around the side elevations to a greater extent, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Front yard setbacks should be varied to a greater extent on streets such as Fairwinds Court and Starlight Drive, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. A minimum landscaped area of 5 feet shall be provided between the back of sidewalk and walls in corner side yard situations to accommodate trees, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. A greater number of driveways shall be paired to create larger combined front yard areas, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. The pedestrian paseo connection between the subdivision and the trail along Victoria Park Lane shall be designed and landscaped to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. A Minor Exception application shall be filed with the Planning Division for the proposed 10 percent reduction in the required front yard and Milliken Avenue building setbacks proposed on Lots 15 through 22 and 33 through 38. This application shall be formally reviewed and a determination rendered, prior to the issuance of any building permits within the subdivision. Additional pilasters and/or varied wall setbacks shall be provided in the perimeter sound wall along Milliken Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 97-21 - CITATION HOMES December 10, 1997 Page 3 13) Front porches shall be of a sufficient size to render them useable, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 14) All applicable conditions of approval from the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 15796 (Resolution No. 97-11) shall apply to this project. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of December 1997 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CON DITIONS PROJECT#: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-21 (DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 15796) DESIGN REVIEW FOR 94 LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION CITATION HOMES NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND VICTORIA PARK LANE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Time Limits Completion Date 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not __/__/__ issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is __/ / involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan. Revised site plans and building elevations incorpo[ating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. SC-6~7 Project No. DR 97-21 Completion Date Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. ! ./ A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. / / If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. / / All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. / / All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. / / For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two %-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. / / 10. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 11. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 12. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. 13. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 2. On flag lots, use a 12-foot driveway within flag to maximize landscape area. D. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. All private slopes of 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. / / SC - 6/97 Project No. DR 97-21 Coml~letion Date All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. / / For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. / / Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Victoria Community Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. / / The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. / / Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Milliken Avenue. / / All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. / / Landscaping and irrigation systems shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Environmental A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. / / Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / SC - 6/97 =PLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) ,.;OMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Project No. DR 97-21 Completion Date 477-2710, FOR G. Site Development The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. / / Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. / / Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. / / H. Grading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. / / 2. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. / / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Fire flow requirement shall be 1,500 gallons per minute. / / A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan approval. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. / / Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporaw water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. SC - 6/97 Project No, DR 97-21 Jo Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: X All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. X Other: per Ordinance 22. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so as not to impede fire apparatus. Plan check fees in the amount of $120.00 shall be paid: X Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 9. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 U BC, U FC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Security Lighting 1. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. Comr~letion Date / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / SC - 6/97 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 10, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Steve Hayes, AICP, Associate Planner DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-22 (DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15797) - CITATION HOMES - The design review of the detailed site plan and building elevations for a previously approved tentative subdivision map consisting of 61 single family lots on 12.4 acres of land in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Kenyon Way and east of Woodruff Place - APN: 227-011-26. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is bounded by the future Foothill Freeway to the north, a neighborhood park to the south, a single family residential subdivision to the east, and a future church site and a neighborhood commercial shopping center to the west. A pedestrian trail exists along the east side of the project area. No significant vegetation or natural features exist on the property. The site is currently in the process of being rough graded and retaining walls constructed per the rough grading plan approved in conjunction with the subdivision. ANALYSIS: General: The applicant is proposing to develop the 61-1ot subdivision with houses that range in size from 1,759 to 2,148 square feet on lots that range in size from 5,000 to 11,800 square feet and average approximately 6,150 square feet. Three models are proposed to be offered, all of which are two-story and have two-car garages facing the streets (the largest plan has the option of a third car tandem garage space or additional liveable area inside the house). Three exterior elevation styles are proposed for each model. A sound attenuation wall along Highland Avenue will be provided per the recommendations of the acoustical analysis prepared in conjunction with this project. All perimeter walls will be designed consistent with the Victoria theme walls established in the area. A fully landscaped and lighted paseo connection to the trail to the east has been designed to connect this subdivision to the Victoria trail system Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on two separate occasions, most recently on November 18, 1997. The Committee (Bethel, Macias, Coleman) recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission once the Committee's comments were addressed to the satisfaction of staff. Staff met with the applicant on two separate occasions following the last Design Review Committee meeting ITEM B PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 97-22 - CITATION HOMES December 10, 1997 Page 2 and found the revised plans to be acceptable for action by the Planning Commission. Please refer to the attached Design Review Committee Action Comments from both meetings for issues that were discussed and recommended Committee revisions (Exhibit "F"). Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed the project on two separate occasions, most recently on November 18, 1997, and determined that, together with the recommended conditions of approval contained in the attached resolution of approval, the project is in compliance with all applicable City Standards and Design Policies. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 97-22, the Design Review for Tentative Tract 15797, through adoption of the attached resolution of approval with conditions. Respectfull~ Brad Buller City Planner BB:SH/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" - Exhibit "D" - Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Site Utilization Map Site Plan/Grading Plan Landscape Plan Building Elevations Floor Plans Design Review Committee Action Comments dated October 14 and November 18, 1997 Resolution of Approval with Conditions ~CT' 7 L 'R.ACT 13722 SITE ARK ~TE ;,: IN THE CiTY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA IENTATIV[ TRACT 15797 PLOT PLAN AND PHASING ,,-~ : ., ~,~._.-: ,;- ...... ..... '1 PHASE 5 -- KEN'~ON PHAS~ 2 WOO0 F'ENC~ COMMUNITY FACILITY [FUTUR[ CHURCli) LOT 12 TRACT NO. 15279 NOT A PART SLUMPSLOCK WALL RETURNS -TYPCAL / __ _~L~UI~.P~L___O~.._~J:I~?,,~E- W~AL_L WTT'H COCU~NS AT 55' ON CENT~[R / wood FENCE- TYPICAL l REFER TO 20 SCALE PLANS/,~'IEET L-2 & l-3 FOR PERI4ETER LANO$CAPE AREA .sE~ SH~E~_?3~ I I~ - O I I I I t I *"'J'Y IlL I I I l I I I ~ / Ill i J I I I I I I l I Ill I I Ii II Ij J WALKWAY P~ANT MA~RIAf.$ LEG[NO LIFT A LLLYAIJOH.~ RIC, I IT REAl( PLAN 1A fRONT JlllllllllJlllllllllJllllJllll[ RC- 5ooo TRACT ;//13797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES ~x,. ~.,. 7 William HezmalSalch Architects, Inc. LEFT UJ. LL~UC)H S REAR ~.~,...~,:'..,~... .¢,~ .... ~,;. ,., ~ '~'~'"" ~ '~?.i~"¢/,,'~' ---~"~*' .. ¢,,~.x~- . ~-~ rlGI IT FI~j~'4T PLAN 18 IIIIHIIIIIIIIIlllllhlllllllll , _l~V/'' RC-- 5000 TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATIGN HOMES ~-11~I-7 Willi,~m Hezmalhalch '~j-~/ Architects, Inc. · ~, · .~ ,~ ~ ~ LIFT REAR RICI IT FRONT PLAN 1C RC - 5000 TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES ,. ~.~ William Hezmalhalch Architects, Inc. IIIIliliilhllllllilJliltllltlJ .~,~ RIGI IT FRONT PLAN 2A RC - 5000 TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES ..7William Hezmalhalch Architects, Inc. RIGI IT FRONT PLAN 2B hllllllllJlllllllllJlllllllllJ RC- 5000 TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES ~,.~. 7 William Hezmalhalch Architects, Inc. LIFT RIGlIT o 4 I h IIIIIIIlllllllllllhlllllllll ill. l LVAIIQJ~ PLAN 2C RC - 5000 TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES RE^R ~,.~. 7William Hezmalhalch Archilecls, Inc. RIGHT FRONT PLAN 3A JllllllillJlllllllllJtllllllllJ RC - 5000 TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOME5 William Hezmalhalch A;chitecls, Inc. NIIIIIIH h IIIIIllllHIHIIlll o ~~. RIO If FRONT PLAN 3B RC - 5000 TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES ...7William Hezmalhalch Architects, Inc. RIGI IT FRONT PLAN 3C .... RC- 5000 h Itllllllllllllllllh Illllllll.-3~. ~.~.~ ~;~:-"~:'-"' TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ;"'~"'~"~ CITATION HOMES ' ' William Hezmalhalch Architects, Inc. h IlllllllJlllllllllJlllllllfll IlLAN 1 1700 SQ.I' T. I'ROG~. AM 1759 5QFT. ACTUAL , RC - 5OOO TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES William Hezmalh.llch Architects, Inc. O1'1'. LOFT hllllllllhlllllflihlllllllll 35' UI'PER LEVI L 947 SQ FT. PLAN 2 19(10 SQFT. PROGRAM 1961 SQ£T. ACTUAL 4 IlDRM./2.5 IIA. 2 CAR GARAC~ RC - 5000 ~ LOWER LEVEL 1014 SQ.FT. TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES ..7William Hezmalhalch Architects, Inc. -q 3S' UPPER LEVEL 1092 SQfT. Jill IIIIIIhllllllllhlllllllll ,~. PLAN 3 2 I00 SQI'T. PROC2RAM 2148 ACTUAL 4 IIDRM./2.5 II^. 3 CAR TANI~M GARAG~ i'LAN ~C RC- 5O00 TRACT #15797 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA CITATION HOMES ,., .7 William Hezmalhalch Architects, Inc. 8:30 p.m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS Steve Hayes October 14, 1997 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-22 (DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 15797) - CITATION HOMES - The design review of the detailed site plan and building elevations for a previously approved tentative subdivision map consisting of 61 single family lots on 12.4 acres of land in the Low- Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located at the northeast comer of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane - APN: 227-011-26. Design Parameters: The project site is bounded by the future Foothill Freeway to the north, a neighborhood park to the south, a single family residential subdivision to the east and a future church site and a neighborhood commercial shopping center to the west. A pedestrian trail exists along the east side of the project area. No significant vegetation or natural features exist on the property. The site is currently in the process of being rough graded per the precise grading plan approved in conjunction with the subdivision. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Additional upgrading of the side elevations on the Series 5000 should be discussed and provided to the satisfaction of the Design Review Committee. The 5000 series, Plans 1 and 2 have a very similar appearing front elevation. Staff recommends that additional variation could be provided through the use of unique detailing and additional material variety. Secondarv Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the follovdng secondary design issues: '' Additional architectural embellishments, such as additional window shutters, wood barges, clipped roof lines, wood siding under gable ends on applicable elevations, etc, should be used to help in providing a complete 360 degree architectural treatment on all elevations. Accent base treatments used on front elevations, such as rock, brick veneer, wood siding, etc., should be wrapped around on the garage side elevations to the point xvhere it is anticipated the return wall will be constructed. Window mullions should be used on all full-size second story windows in addition to those already shown on the elevations. Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: Front yard setbacks should be varied to a greater extent, especially on long stretches ofstraioht streets, such as Fallingstar Court and Cotton Cloud Drive, to create more street scape varietf. A minimum landscaped area of 5 feet should be provided between the back of sidewalk and walls in corner side yard situations. Wherever possible, driveways should be grouped in twos to allow for larger groupings of front yard areas on contiguous lots. DRC COMMENTS DR 97-22 - CITATION HOMES October 14, 1997 Page 2 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee direct the applicant to make the appropriate design modifications and return to the Committee as a full item once the plans are revised to the satisfaction of staff. Desilgn Revie~v Committee Action: Members Present: Bill B&thel, Larry McNeil, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Steve Hayes The Design Review Committee did not recommend approval of the project as presented. The Committee recommended that the applicant to work with staff during the next three weeks in preparation for returning to the Committee as a full item on the next agenda. Items that should be addressed by the applicant are as follows: o The front elevations of the Series 5000, Plans 1 and 2, should be redesigned to not have such a similar appearance. In addition to the wood trim around all windows and attic vents, the side and rear elevations of all models should be upgraded by using accent elements such as, but not limited to, shutter details, potshelf details, clipped roof lines, window breakups and wood siding and barges under all gable ends (where applicable). Drivexvays should be grouped in twos to produce larger clusters of front yard areas wherever possible. Accent base treatments used on the front elevations should be wrapped around on the garage side elevations to the point where it is anticipated the return wall will be constructed. All above-referenced policy issues should be addressed by the applicant. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 8:20 p.m. Steve Hayes November 18, 1997 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-22 (DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 157973 - CITATION HOMES - The design review of the detailed site plan and building elevations for a previously approved tentative subdivision map consisting of 61 single family lots on 12.4 acres of land in the Low- Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Kenyon Way and east of Woodruff Place - APN: 227-011-26. Background: The Design Review Committee (Bethel, McNiel, Coleman) reviewed the project at their October 14, 1997 meeting, and recommended that the project return as a full item for further review of the Committee. Staff has attached the Design Review Committee Action Comments from that meeting for your convenience. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion: At the time of comment preparation, revised plans reflecting the requested modifications had not yet been received. Staff will provide the Committee with an oral update at the meeting. Attachment: DRC Action Comments dated October 14, 1997 Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Bill Bethel, Rich Macias, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Steve Hayes The Design Review Committee directed the applicant to continue to work with staff to address the following issues: To mitigate the similarities in form and bulk of the proposed homes, the following items should be incorporated into the exterior building elevations: a. Additional outlookers on gable ends, where applicable; b. Additional shutter details, where applicable, and window breakups in second story windows; c. Pop-outs or variations in the building plane; and Varying the roof systems to a greater extent so that a greater variety of rooflines are exposed to public view (if this is accomplished sucessfully, then pop-outs in the building may not be required). 2. More variation in the design of the garage doors should be provided. The amount of flat, useable rear yard area should be increased to meet the minimum City Standard of 15 feet for all lots. The density and palette of the landscaping on the project side of the multi-purpose trail to the east should have elements of consistency with that already existing on the east side of the trail, in accordance with City Standards. DRC COMMENTS DR 97-22 - CITATION HOMES November 18, 1997 Page 2 The recommendations of the Grading Committee regarding driveway grades should be addressed to the satisfaction of staff. Other previously referenced secondary and policy issues should be addressed to the satisfaction of the Committee. Once the above-referenced issues have been addressed to the satisfaction of staff, then the project can be scheduled for consideration of the Planning Commission. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-22, THE DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15797, THE DESIGN REVIEW OF THE DETAILED SITE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS FOR AN APPROVED TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP CONSISTING OF 61 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ON 12.4 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF KENYON WAY AND EAST OF WOODRUFF PLACE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-011-26. A. Recitals. 1. Citation Homes has filed an application for Development Review 97-22, the Design Review of Tract No. 15797, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of December 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a meeting to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on December 10, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 97-22 - CITATION HOMES December 10, 1997 Page 2 Planning Division 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 11) 12) 13) Additional architectural treatment, such as additional outlookers on gable ends, shutter details, window breakups, pop-outs or variations in roof designs, shall be provided to provide additional architectural variation between the proposed houses, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Additional garage door variation shall be provided, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. A minimum of 15 feet of flat, useable rear yard area shall be provided on each lot to the satisfaction of the City Planner. The landscape palette and the density of the landscape provided on the west side of the existing trail east of the subdivision and the paseo connection shall be similar to that already used on the east side of the trail, to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. All driveways shall be designed so as to not exceed a maximum slope of 10 percent, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Where wood siding is used as an accent treatment, it shall be wrapped around the side elevations to a greater extent, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Front yard setbacks should be varied to a greater extent on streets such as Fallingstar Court and Cotton Cloud Drive, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. A minimum landscaped area of 5 feet shall be provided between the back of sidewalk and walls in corner side yard situations to accommodate trees, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. A greater number of driveways shall be paired to create larger combined front yard areas, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. The pedestrian paseo connection between the subdivision and the trail to the east shall be curvilinear in nature, to the satisfaction of the City Planner and City Engineer. Open fencing shall be used along the northern boundary of lot 21 of Tract 15797 for the area beyond the fudhest front projection of the house, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Additional pilasters and/or varied wall setbacks shall be provided in the perimeter sound wall along Milliken Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Front porches shall be of a sufficient size to render them useable, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. DR 97-22 - CITATION HOMES December 10, 1997 Page 3 14) All applicable conditions of approval from the Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract 15797 (Resolution No. 97-13) shall apply to this project. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of December 1997 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CON DITIONS PROJECT#: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-22 (DESIGN REVIEW FOR TRACT 15797) DESIGN REVIEW FOR 61 LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION CITATION HOMES NORTH OF KENYON WAY, EAST OF WOODRUFF PLACE, SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Time Limits Completion Date 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not __/__/__ issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is / / involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Victoria Community Plan. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. SC - 6/97 Project No. DR 97-22 Completion Date Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC conde'nsers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. / / / / All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. / / For single family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two Yz-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 10. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. / / 11. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. / / / / / / / / 12. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. 13. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. C. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 2. On flag lots, use a 12-foot driveway within flag to maximize landscape area. / / D. Landscaping / / A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. / / All private slopes of 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. / / SC - 6/97 Project No. DR 97-22 Completion Date All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. / / .4. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigations shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. / / Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Victoria Community Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. / / The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Highland Avenue. / / All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. / / Landscaping and irrigation systems shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. / / Environmental A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. / / Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / SC - 6/97 ~PLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) ..OMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Project No. DR 97-22 Completion Date 477-2710, FOR G. Site Development The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. / / Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. / / H. Grading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. / / · 2. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. / / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Fire flow requirement shall be 1,500 gallons per minute. / / A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire department personnel prior to water plan ~pproval. / / For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy. / / Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivery of any combustible building materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel. / / Existing fire hydrant locations shall be provided prior to water plan approval. Required hydrants, if any, will be determined by the Fire District. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a 4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers. / / Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Fire District that an approved temporary water supply for fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. / / SC - 6/97 o ¸7. ~ Projec{ No. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to final inspection. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: X All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. X Other: per Ordinance 22. All trees and shrubs planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so as not to impede fire apparatus. Plan check fees in the amount of $120.00 shall be paid: X Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 9. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Security Lighting 1. Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. 2. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. DR 97-22 Completion Date / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / SC - 6/97 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 10, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner CONDITIONAL USF PERMIT 97-11 - FINAL SCORE - A request to expand the existing bar and restaurant with entertainment by adding approximately 1,400 square feet of outdoor seating area, in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8411 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207-571-75. (Continued from November 12, 1997) ENTERTAINMF:NT PFRMIT 93-03 MODIFICATION - FINAL SCORE - A request to expand the days and hours of entertainment and add dancing for an existing bar and restaurant with outdoor seating area, in the Community Commercial Distdct of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8411 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207-571-75. (Continued from November 12, 1997) BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission continued the above two items to this hearing date so that the applicant could submit a study to show that the vestibule is not needed for sound attenuation. As of the writing of this report, staff had not received any study or new information from the applicant. However, the applicant did verbally inform staff that the noise testing done by his acoustical consultant confirmed the necessity of a vestibule. He stated he agrees to do the improvements. The majodty of the Planning Commission felt that entertainment should be in place for a period of time in order to determine if problems arise pdor to considering any expansion. The Commission directed staff to return with resolutions of denial for Conditional Use Permit 97-11 and Modification to Entertainment Permit 93-03. Attached is the Staff Report from the meeting on November 12, 1997, including the resolution of approval for modification to Entertainment Permit 93-03. RECOMMENDATION: As requested by the Commission, attached are resolutions of denial for Conditional Use Permit 97-11 and Modification to Entertainment Permit 93-03. City Planner BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Staff Report dated November 12, 1997 Resolution of Denial for CUP 97-11 Resolution of Denial for EP 93-03 Modification ITEMS C & D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 12, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-11 - FINAL SCORE - A request to expand the existing bar and restaurant with entertainment by adding approximately 1,400 square feet of outdoor seating area, in the Community Commercial Distdct of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8411 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 207-571-75. (Continued from October 8, 1997) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 93-03 MODIFICATION - FINAL SCORE - A request to expand the days and hours of entertainment and add dancing for an existing bar and restaurant with outdoor seating area, in the Community Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8411 Foothill Boulevard APN: 207-571-75. (Continued from October 8, 1997) BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission continued the above items to this hearing date at the request of the applicant to allow time for acoustical testing and preparation of landscape and irrigation plans. At the writing of this report, staff had not received any additional information from the applicant. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTIONS: Site Characteristics: The site is at the junction of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road. It contains the Final Score building, several structures such as carports and garages, and an office for an auto repair shop. The existing improvements are non-conforming because the ultimate public improvements are missing and the on-site improvements, setbacks, percentage of on-site landscaping, and parking are not up to current standards. Surrounding Land Use: West of the site is zoned commercial and planned for a mixed use development of retail and office uses in the front with a mini-storage facility in the back. North of the site is the Sycamore Inn and zoned for Commercial uses. South of the site is a railroad track which is no longer in use. Beyond the south side of the railroad tracks are townhouses and single family homes. Parking Calculations: Number of Numberof Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces Of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Final Score 2,239 1/100 22 Patio Seating 1,400 1/100 14 Auto Repair 3 bays 2/bay ~ 42 42 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-11 & MOD. TO EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE November 12, 1997 Page 2 ANALYSIS: Background: On February 14, 1996, the Planning Commission conditionally approved an Entertainment Permit for Final Score after conducting several public hearings between 1994 and 1996. In granting the approval, the Commission imposed conditions and mitigations that address the nuisance problems identified by the adjacent residents. One of the conditions of approval requires the applicant to complete the mitigations before offering entertainment. To date, the applicant has not completed all of them and, therefore, has not commenced the approved use. On March 17, 1997, the applicant submitted two applications requesting expansion of the bar use and intensification of the entertainment use. Exhibit "F" is a chronology of the applications and the site. Exhibit "G" is a copy of Resolution No. 96-05, which shows the conditions of approval and mitigations for the original permit. Section C below summarizes the applicant's effort in complying with conditions of approval and mitigation. B. Proposed Applications: Conditional Use Permit: Under the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, a restaurant with bar will require a Conditional Use Permit. Final Score, having been a bar and restaurant before the City's incorporation and adoption of the Development Code and Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, is "grandfathered." The outdoor patio area for the serving of food and non-alcoholic drinks is considered ancillary to the restaurant and is permitted. Because the applicant requests the serving of alcohol within the outdoor patio area, it is considered an expansion of the bar use, which requires a Conditional Use Permit. Modification to Entertainment Permit: The types of entertainment approved was limited to live bands and disc jockeys. The days and hours of entertainment approved were limited to between 8 p.m. and 12 midnight, Friday and Saturday and 3 p.m. and 10 p.m. on Sunday. The applicant requests expanding the approval by adding dancing, offering entertainment seven nights a week between 9 p.m. and 1 a.m., and serving alcohol in the outdoor patio area. This expansion requires a modification to the Entertainment Permit. Go Status of Compliance with Conditions of Approval and Mitigation: In response to a condition of approval of the original permit, the applicant submitted a Minor Development Review (MDR 97-01) application in March of 1997, indicating the completed improvements to date and the ones that need to be completed. The items that the applicant has completed are: posted "restricted parking" signs to the rows of parking spaces west and south of the building, moved four satellite dishes to be ground mounted, moved the unscreened trash bin to behind the existing office building, and resurfaced and restriped the parking lots. He also received approval for the addition of a vestibule, but he did not obtain a building permit. The outstanding items that need to be completed are: submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans for review and approval; install the landscaping; obtain building permits and construct the fencing and vestibule; install the fencing along the property boundary; and request inspection from Building and Safety's Fire Prevention Unit to verify the interior noise control measures have been installed satisfactorily. The applicant is working toward compliance. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-11 & MOD. TO EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE November 12, 1997 Page 3 Compatibility of the Proposed Uses and Neighborhood Concerns: As mentioned in the beginning of this report, the applicant requests approval to serve alcohol outside on the patio and to intensify the entertainment uses. The issue staff raises is whether the intensification of the bar and entertainment uses would be compatible to the surrounding uses, especially the residential area south of the site. To date, staff has received three letters from property owners of the adjacent condominium complex as shown in Exhibit "1," who oppose the proposed uses. Expansion of the outdoor patio area to include the serving of alcohol. At the 1996 headng, and in addressing the neighborhood concerns of loud noise and disturbances, the Commission imposed a 9 p.m. restriction for serving food and non-alcoholic drinks in the outdoor patio. Allowing the serving of alcohol in the outdoor patio until 1 a.m. may increase the opportunities for these types of nuisance problems. The increase in nuisance problems may not affect the adjacent commercial uses, but will negatively impact the adjacent residents. Staff does not recommend allowing the serving of alcohol in the outdoor patio in this case because of the site's proximity to residential areas and because the nuisance problems such as loud noise, disturbances, and loud music spilling out from the building cannot be mitigated. The applicant can continue to serve food and non-alcoholic ddnks until 9 p.m. as stated in Resolution No. 96-05. 2. Adding dancing and offering entertainment nightly between 9 p.m. and 1 a.m. The applicant stated that he has cleaned up his business. He stated he has installed the interior noise control measures and they worked in reducing the loud music and noise. He has offered one night entertainment on special events or holidays such as super bowl Sunday, New Year's Eve, etc., through Temporary Use Permits in 1995 and 1996. He has been very conscientious in making sure that the special one night entertainment would not impact the adjacent residents. He stated that the City has not received complaints from the residents. These are the reasons he requests intensifying the uses. A review of our records confirmed that he had received approval for temporary entertainment once in 1995 and five times in 1996. The applicant did not apply for temporary entertainment in 1997. A review of the City's Code Enforcement records also showed that no complaints have been received. In the review of the original permit, the Commission agreed with the results of the Noise Study, which showed that control measures done to the building interior can effectively reduce loud music and noise to an insignificant level. The Commission also found that limiting the intensity of the entertainment together with requiring security personnel inside and outside the building, and requiring buffedng would prevent the unwanted activities in the parking lot. The Commission determined that if the interior and exterior control measures were in place, then the nuisance problems should be minimized. Unfortunately, the applicant has not completed all the control measures so that he could begin his entertainment. Without the entertainment in operation, staff cannot assess how successful the interior and exterior control measures are under a continuous period of six months or more. Public Safety Concerns: A concern with any entertainment use is the potential for an increase in the need for fire and police resources. Records from Police Department showed the total number of service calls to be 11 in 1997, 18 in 1996, 14 each in both 1995 and 1994. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-11 & MOD. TO EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE November 12, 1997 Page 4 However, a representative of the Police Department cautioned that they would expect an increase in service calls with the adding of entertainment. Exhibit "J" shows the types of service calls for 1994 through 1997. According to the Fire Department, the maximum number of occupants allowed in the bar, restaurant, and dancing areas is 44 and the area designated for pool tables is 12. If the number of occupants exceeds the above maximum, then the applicant shall obtain a separate permit and approval from the Fire Department. Also, a representative of the Fire Department stated that the bamboo fences affixed to the wrought iron fence around the outdoor patio are a fire hazard and need to be removed. This item was added as a condition of approval. Parking: Under Ordinance No. 58, the applicant is required to dedicate, as an irrevocable offer, Foothill Boulevard street frontage for ultimate public improvement. The future improvement would eliminate the entire row of parking spaces along the street frontage. Staff has prepared Exhibit "H" that shows a concept of redesigning the parking area to achieve the required 42 spaces. Staff has placed a condition of approval that requires City Planner review for any changes to the parking lot. Conclusion: Based on the above analysis, staff believes if the interior and exterior control measures as listed in Exhibit "G" - Resolution 96-05 are in place, they should work in minimizing nuisance problems. However staff believes that allowing the serving of alcohol in the outdoor patio area and expanding the hours of serving food and alcoholic drinks to 1 a.m. would increase the opportunities for nuisance problems. Disturbances, loud noise, and loud music spilling out from opening doors of the building could not be mitigated and would have a negative impact on the adjacent residents. FACTS FOR FINDING: The Commission must make all of the following findings to approve the two applications. A. Conditional Use Permit: That the proposed use in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provision of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. B. Entertainment Permit: That the conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, or disorderly manner. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-11 & MOD. TO EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE November 12, 1997 Page 5 That the applicant, or any person associated with him as principal or partner or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such' permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offenses involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of any kind or of a felony or of any cdme involving moral turpitude or has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol, of the provisions of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years. 4. That the granting of the application would not create a public nuisance. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhoods. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily ~ newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site, for both the October 8, and November 12, 1997, hearings. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adding dancing, expanding the entertainment to Thursday, and expanding the hours of entertainment from 12 midnight to 1 a.m. from Thursday through Saturday but maintaining 10 p.m. for Sunday. Staff recommends a six-month review after the entertainment has commenced. Staff recommends denial of the serving of alcohol in the outdoor patio area because of its proximity to the adjacent residences. City Planner BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "1" Exhibit "J" Resolution Resolution - Location and Site Utilization Maps - Site Plan - Floor Plan Outdoor Patio Elevation of Vestibule Chronology of the applications and site Planning Commission Resolution No. 96-05 Concept of Parking Area Three Letters from Residents 1994 to 1997 Police Service Calls of Denial for CUP 97-11 of Approval for EP 93-03 Modification ---$AN-BERNARE)tNO ROAD ® I 8J~C ® Par. Tract No. 9518, M.B. 134/35-37 Rancho. Cucomonga Cily Tax Rote. Area 15OO9- 15OI2 PAR.NO. 4A P.I. ~o?-57 OF RANCt-IO CUCAMONGA PI.ANNING DIVISION EX]IIBIT: oI$C^LE: B~ar Gulch Pro 14. r to'occup~.~cy. 'Cont~.t th~ rtrG ~f,ty control -~1 th~ !at~er ~'t~ge~ of construction to determine the exact cJP ~ F// ~q~_~ Hop. ~'~/T " ~P " CrT~ O? ~C ~O~.:.":,.C-' U CAM 0 NGA PLANNING.. 'DMSION t~: fi:? q.~-oa NOD- T~: ~l~r ~ E~~: SCALE: C 310 Grayson Halle Architect Architecture & Planning L ~ I. ALl STUDS ~ t 2~L5 · / , ~.,I s~s STUD 4, CHRONOLOGY FOR FINAL SCORE '1993 - '1994 (EP 93-03 AND CUP 93-39) -'1- Date 8/24/93 9/20/93 9/21/93 3/17/94 3/20/94 4/4/94 5/11/94 6/7/94 6/13/94 7/18 to 7/25 7/27/94 8/29/94 9/12/94 9/19/94 Status The applicant, Gary Rousa, submitted the two applications. Staff sent a notice of incompleteness to him. Staff met with Gary and went over the incompleteness comments with him item by item. Staff suggested to him that he should hire a professional to prepare the development plans. Staff received a progress pdnt from the applicant. Applicant resubmitted plans for the two applications. Staff sent a notice of incompleteness to the applicant. Staff informed the applicant that he could proceed with the EP application if the detailed site plan and floor plan were provided. Applicant submitted a site plan and a floor plan. Staff scheduled the EP 93-03 for the July 27, 1994, Planning Commission meeting. Over 10 letters objecting to the EP were received. Also, petitions objecting to the EP from the residents who lived at the southerly condo complex were received. Planning Commission tabled the item and directed the applicant to submit an acoustical study to determine the noise level generated by the proposed entertainment and the necessary mitigation. Staff sent a letter to the applicant verifying that he preferred the option where the City selects and hires a registered Acoustical Engineer to prepare the study at his expense. Staff obtained two verbal estimates (Gordon Bricken & Associates and J.J. Van Houten & Associates) - $3,000 to $5,000. Verbally informed the applicant about the cost of the study. He stated that was way beyond his budget. EXHIBIT "F" CHRONOLOGY FOR FINAL SCORE 1995 (EP 93-03 AND CUP 93-39) -2' 5/4/95 5/16/95 5/30/95 5/31/95 6/5/95 6/12/95 7/10/95 7/18/95 8/8, 8/10 & 8/17 8/21/95 9/11/95 Applicant provided a consultant's name (George E. Leighton) who could do a noise study for a cost of $300 to $400. Staff sent a letter to three consultants inviting them to submit a proposal for a noise study: Gorden Bricken & Associates, J.J. Van Houten & Associates, and George E. Leighton (Applicant's suggested consultant) Staff received proposals from all three consultants. The cost ranged from a high of $7,700, to $3,200 to a low of $800. Staff notified the applicant that once a consultant is selected he must submit the money to the City before staff would give notice to the consultant to begin work. George E. Leighton submitted supplemental information to clarify his scope of work. Staff informed the applicant and George E. Leighton that the latter was selected as the consultant to do the noise study. Staff also informed the applicant that he must submit $800 before staff would authorize the consultant to begin work. Staff received $800 from the applicant. Staff notified the consultant to begin work with a 30-day deadline. Staff called and left a message for the consultant to find out the status of the noise study. Staff called and connected with the consultant. He stated he would be doing the report the next week. When staff questioned him on the delay, he stated that it was due to the relocation of his office which affected his productivity. Staff reminded him that he needed to let staff know when he could perform the work because staff had to make the proper arrangement for him to be on the site or at the site of the adjacent townhouse complex. He stated it would be most likely the next Thursday and he would call to confirm the date. Staff did not receive the confirmation date. Staff received a preliminary report from the consultant. EXHIBIT "F" CHRONOLOGY FOR FINAL SCORE 1995 - 1996 (EP 93-03 AND CUP 93-39) -3- 10/9~95 10/16/95 11/2/95 11/13/95 11/20/95 1/10/96 1/24/96 2/14/96 Staff notified the consultant that his report was incomplete and inadequate. Staff also found that the applicant had been doing improvements to the interior of the building according to the recommendations of the consultant, ahead of the procedures and without authorization from the City. Staff met with the consultant to discuss the noise study. Staff told him that the proper procedures were as follows: the consultant to submit a completed noise study identifying the existing building construction, the projected noise level with the entertainment on, and the noise-control measures to reduce the noise to an insignificant level; staff to review the completeness and adequacy of the study and determine which noise-control measures require building permits; and, only after the approval of the Entertainment Permit (EP) could the applicant process plan check for those noise-control measures that require building permits and begin construction. Staff met with the consultant and the applicant. At this meeting, staff emphasized to both that the applicant chose to do the improvements on his own. This could result in the following risks: the approval of the EP is not guaranteed and/or the work done is not according to City codes. The consultant agreed to revise the preliminary study to address the identified deficiencies and submit a final noise study. Final noise study received. Staff determined the study to be complete and adequate. Because of a need to re-advertise the EP for a public hearing and the next available Commission meeting being close to the holiday season, staff, with the consent of the applicant, scheduled the headng for the meeting on January 10, 1996. On December 20, 1995, staff received a continuance request from the applicant because of a time conflict. On January 10, the Commission continued the item to January 24 meeting at the applicant's request. The Commission held the public hearing, received public testimony from residents, and deliberated on the compatibility issue. Because of a lack of majority votes to approve or deny, the Commission continued to the February 14, 1996 meeting. The Commission approved, with conditions, Entertainment Permit 93-03. EXHIBIT "F" CHRONOLOGY FOR FINAL SCORE 1997 (EP 93-03 AND CUP 93-39) '4- 3/18/97 4/21/97 8/19/97 9/18/97 10/8/97 Applicant submitted three applications: MDR 97-01 to comply with a condition of approval under EP 93-03, Modification to EP 93-03 for expansion of his entertainment use, and CUP 97-11 for expansion of the outdoor patio and bar use. Letter to applicant informing him of the incomplete status of his applications. Revised plans submitted. The revised plans did not address several technical issues Staff met with applicant and gave him a list to assist him in completing the application. Staff scheduled his applications for the hearing on October 8, 1997. Applicant requested a continuance to November 12 meeting. He said he would like more time to complete interior noise testing and to hire a landscape architect to prepare the landscape and irrigation plans. EXHIBIT "F" RESOLUTION NO. 96-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 93-03, A REQUEST TO CONDUCT ENTERTAINMENT CONSISTING OF LIVE BANDS, DISC JOCKEYS, AND DANCING IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT AND BAR IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 8411 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-571-75. A. Recitals. 1. Garry Rousa of the Final Score has filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit No. 93-03, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of July, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date, and took no action pending the submittal of a Noise Study from the applicant. The Commission directed staff to advertise said application for a new public hearing once the Noise Study information was submitted and ready for their review. 3. On January 10 and continued to January 24, and February 14, 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on January 24, and February 14, 1996, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 8411 Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 545.21 feet and lot depth of 150 feet and is presently improved with several buildings and structures; and b. The property to the north contains a restaurant, the properties to the south contain an inactive railroad track and single family homes and townhouses, the property to the west is vacant; and c. The applicant proposes to offer entertainment consisting of live bands, disc jockeys, and dancing in conjunction with a restaurant and bar, from Thursday through Sunday, between the hours of 8 p.m. and 12 midnight; and ,~, ~.~ ~ / ..~' '1 PLANNING COMMISSIO,, RESOLUTION NO. 96-05 EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE February 14, 1996 Page 2 d. Adjacent residents on the south side of the site have submitted a petition objecting to the granting of the Entertainment Permit because of the nuisance problems of loud music, loud noise, and other related disturbances; and e. To address the nuisance problems, a Noise Study was done to assess the noise impact and determine the noise control measures. The applicant has sound proofed and/or agreed to sound proof the building in accordance with the noise-control measures listed in the Noise Study. The noise-control measures are added as conditions of approval contained in this resolution. f. Additional control measures are added as conditions of approval contained in this resolution to alleviate and minimize other nuisance problems such as noise and disturbances from the loitering activities within the parking lot and/or the railroad embankment. These control measures included providing fencing along the property line that abuts the railroad tracks, providing security personnel inside and outside the facility, limiting the days and hours of entertainment, etc. g. With all the control measures in place, the potential nuisance problems can be minimized to an acceptable level. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. b. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, or disorderly manner. c. That the applicant, or any person associated with him as principal or partner or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of any kind or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude or has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provisions of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years. d. That the granting of the application would not create a public nuisance. e. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood. f. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the application identified in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereafter, pursuant to Section 15061 b-3 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth ',l~elow. PDANNING COMMISSIC EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE February 14, 1996 Page 3 ~,ESOLUTION NO. 96-05 Plannina Division 1) Approval is granted for the following entertainment uses: a) live bands; 2) b) disc jockeys; and Any expansion of entertainment shall require modification to this permit. The days and hours of operation for the entertainment shall be limited to between 8 p.m. and 12 midnight, Friday and Saturday and 3 p.m. to 10 p.m., Sunday. Any expansion of days and hours shall require modification to this permit. 3) No adult entertainment, as defined in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.04.090, shall be permitted. 4) A minimum of one duly licensed, certified or trained, and regularly employed secudty guard from a reputable security firm shall be required to be on the premises from 8 p.m. until two hours after the conclusion of any entertainment. One of the guards shall be in "peace officer" attire and shall remain on duty in the parking area and outside adjacent areas of the facility to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons or anyone in the parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbances. 5) All noise control measures contained in the Final Noise Study and as listed below shall be completed: a) Add acoustic door seals to all exit doors. b) Add interior ceiling with R-11 insulation over the pool room. c) isolate speakers from the structure. d) Remove the two speakers from the roof ceiling and hang only one speaker down from the roof ceiling. e) Upgrade the interior windows. Detailed plans and/or specifications shall be submitted within 60 days for City Planner and Building Official review and approval, and the building inspected for compliance prior to commencement of entertainment use. 6) Decorative fencing together with dense landscaping of shrubs and trees along the property line that abuts the railroad tracks shall be provided. Detailed plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted within 60 days for City Planner review and approval. The fence and the landscape shall be completed and inspected to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to commencement of entertainment use. 7) The row of parking immediately tocated southwest of the building (parking spaces numbered 1 through 9 and 35 through 41) shall not be PLANNING COMMISSIC. EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE February 14, 1996 Page 4 (ESOLUTION NO. 96-05 used by the patrons of the Final Score between 8 p.m. and 6 a.m. RESTRICTED PARKING signs shall be posted prior to commencement of entertainment use. 8) Serving of food and non-alcoholic beverages in the outdoor patio area shall cease on and after 9 p.m. The serving of alcoholic drinks is not allowed at any time in the outdoor patio area. 9) All parking and outdoor seating areas shall have a minimum maintained one-foot candle power security lighting. All parking lot light fixtures shall not exceed 15 feet as measured from the finished surface to the top of the light fixture. The light fixtures shall have shields for reducing the glare and shall be oriented away from residential areas. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted within 60 days and the lighting installed prior to commencement of entedainment use. No new trash enclosure is required at this time; however, the City Planner may require a trash enclosure, per City Standards, to be provided and completed within 60 days of said notice if the City Planner finds that the trash container is left in public view. 11) Detailed plans to show the completed improvements to date and required new improvements or upgrades such as, but are not limited to, the outdoor patio area, the parking lot, the satellite dishes, the trash enclosure, etc., shall be submitted as a Minor Development Review application within 60 days for City Planner review and approval prior to commencement of entertainment use. 12) All doors and windows shall remain closed after 7 p.m. or during live entertainment except in the case of emergency. The maximum number of occupants shall not exceed building and fire codes. The maximum occupancy for each room shall be posted as determined by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and/or the City's Fire Prevention Unit Division. The building shall comply with all requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Plans shall be submitted for the Fire Distdct's review and approval within 60 days. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to the commencement of the entertainment use. 15) The building shall comply with all requirements of the Uniform Building Code. Plans shall be submitted for the Building Official's review and approval within 60 days. The building and the site shall be inspected for compliance prior to commencement of entertainment use. If the operation of the business creates public safety problems such as but not limited to: loitering and disturbances, noise, overcrowding, blocked fire exits, etc., thi's entertainment permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration of modification and/or revocation. Failure to comply with the conditions of approval and applicable City Ordinances shall cause the suspension and/or revocation of the Entertainment Permit by the Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSIO,, RESOLUTION NO. 96-05 EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE February 14, 1996 Page 5 o 17) Provide a vestibule at the main entrance of the building for sound attenuation. Detailed plans shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The vestibule shall be completed prior to commencement of entertainment use. 18) All conditions of approval shall be satisfied prior to commencement of the entertainment use. Engineerina Division 1) The issuance of a building permit for the trash enclosure and the parking lot lighting will require an irrevocable offer of dedication for the Foothill Boulevard frontage which will total 64 feet from the street centerline to the property line in accordance with the Municipal Code, Chapter 12.08. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 1996. P ISSlONOFTHECIT OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA \ B E. a'id~,. Bark~~--' ATTEST.,;-/' ~ ~-¢'¢'"'-~-.'~- , / B rad./~/~Secre'ta,..~./ I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of February 1996, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: LUHPP, FIEZIiHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~,R.T~gP., lv'~qT~T, ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EP^RTHENT ~EOUIREHENT~ md portable fire extlngutsher~ are required to be illstailed' to'occupancy. ''Contact the Fire ~afety control Division the latter 5tages of construction to determitre the exact Rancho Cucamont~ Planning Commission 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 RECEIVED SEP 9 1991 Cil¥ o! Raftoho Cucafitoftga Planning Division Dear Commission members; It seems to me that a similar request by the Final Score tavern was made in the past year. I cannot understand why it is possible this same organization is permited to continue to take up our and your time to persue this mater. There are many reasons why I feel that the request should be denied: I.The business backs up against a residential complex and ve~ likely will result in a in the value of these houses. 2. The noise developed by the entertainment aspect of this operation and the extended will detremental to the rearing of rite many children living in this housing complex. 3.Tm~¢ on Foothill Boulevard, and particularly at this point is ve~ congested and plex because of the intersection of San Bernardino and Foothill and the visability from the east. Also this is a bar and the chances of people departing the business may possibly be n bit less in control. 4. Is it not neccssmy for an enviormental im!~ct report done before any such permit might begiven for this change. Because of tire afore mentiond reasous I feel tim the Conditional Use Permit 97/I 1 Final Score and Emertainmem Permit 93/03 Modificatioo- Finnl Score be denied, we do not need any more entertainment and bars in Rancho Cucamonga, this is suposed to be a family city. Thank for you time, James L. Kimball 84?2 Cherryblossom St. Rancho Cucamonga, Cn/ September 22, 1997 RECEIVEo SEP 9 lgg? City of Rancho Cucarnonga Planning Division Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Conditional Use Permit 97-11 - Final Score Entertainment Permit 93-03 Modification - Final Score I am strongly opposed to the above referenced permits. I live in Rancho Villas which is directly to the south of the Final Score. I am also a member of the Board of Directors for the Association. The residents of Rancho Villas have the right to live in a residential neighborhood without having to listen to bar noise. The bar is so close to some of our homes that the noise would keep people from sitting on their patios or having their windows open. Also the type of people that frequent this bar are less than desirable, quite often there are bar patrons up on the railroad tracks causing trouble. The bar has definitely lowered the value of our homes. If these permits are passed, I would hope you would require the owner to build a sound wall around the patio to keep out the noise, and hire a security guard to patrol the outer area. I definitely do not approve of expanding the entertainment hours. The residents of Rancho Villas should not have to be kept awake when they need to go to work the next day. Please take my comments into consideration when making your decision. Sincerely Ms. Diane Atherton Homeowner MR. & MRS. R.F. DEEMS4, 8963 OAKMONT DR. ~' ~, SANTA ROSA, CA 95409 ~'~ ~'~.~) C6'y ~_Rancho ,., Septo 29, 1997 Planning Division Rancho Cucamonga, Ca P.O ~ox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca 91729 Re:APN 207 571 75 8411 Foothill Gentlemen: I strongly oject to the proposed expansion for entertainment and music: A. Too close to existing Rancho Villa town homes - noise. B. Drifting people who have been drinking at the bar have disturbed residents in Rancho Villas; and the added entertainment and activity would further hurt the living in the Villas. At one time I lived at 8484 Cherry Blossom' and the disturbance from the bar patrons was at times bothersome. Permitting expanded music and entertainment will not be an enhancement to the community from the location petitioning under ~PN 207 571 75 Rfd/rfd Owner of preperty at 8479 Greenleaf Ln Very truly y~urs, Ralph F. Deems Printed: 02/05/96 15:02 Final Score 8411 Foothill LOC DR 8411 FOOTHILL 119400496 119400499 119402347 119403900 119410184 119411000 119412344 119414035 119414037 119502993 119508470 DATE BL 01/11/94 01/11/94 02/17/94 02/21/94 03/29/94 04/23/94 05/13/94 08/27/94 08/31/94 09/17/94 10/19/94 11/13/94 11/29/94 11/29 ~94 01/01 '95 01/01 '95 01/31'95 02/07'95 02/08'95 03/05'95 04/03'95 04/11'95 07/22'95 07/22'95 08/03'95 09/24'95 10/07'95 12/21'95 01/18/96 (NV) 11/15/94 Records printed: 30 TIME DAY TYPE CALL 0946 1221 1824 0049 1805 0124 2018 2007 0029 1833 1547 .1553 0006 0135 2354 2354 0636 1920 1545 1752 1730 0946 2311 2311 2242 0129 1753 0000 1621 2252 STAT TYPE TUE 242R 940110057 RTF ASSAULT REPORT TUE COUNTR 940110093 RTF COUNTER REPORT THU INC 940480178 SUP INCIDENT/MISC. LAW ENF CALL MON 647F 940520005 ARR DRUNK IN PUBLIC TUE 4158 940880175 RTF SUBJECT DISTURBANCE SAT AREACK 941130017 CAN AREA CHECK REQUESTED FRI 1182 941330256 NAT NON INJURY ACCIDENT SAT 242R 942390261 RTF ASSAULT REPORT WED UNKPRO 942430007 NAT U~KNOWN TYPE PROBLEM SAT 1182 942600206 RTF NON INJURY ACCIDENT WED 488R 942920161 RTF PETTY THEFT REPORT SUN AOD 943170159 NAT ASSIST OTHER DEPARTS~NT TUE 12025R 943330001 ARR C~RRY CONCEALED W~--APON REPORT TUE 496 943330012 ARR STOLEN PROPERTY SUN 10851 950010272 UNF GROUND THEFT AUTO - INPROGRESS SUN 10851 950010272 UNF GRAND THEFT AUTO - INPROGKESS TUE 459A 950310036 FAL AUDIBLE ALARM TUE 5150 950380194 GOA PSYCHO INVESTIGATION - INPROG WED COUNTR 950390176 NAT COUNTER REPORT SUN 20002R 950640164 RTF HiT AND RUN NON INJURY REPORT MON 1182 950930187 CAN NON INJURY ACCIDENT TUE 459A 951010072 FAL AUDIBLE ALAFcM SAT UiXq<PRO 952030289 C~N UNq<NO~ TYPE PROBLEM SAT 23152R 952030291 RTF DRiViNG UNDER INFLUENCE REPORT THU 10851R 952150265 UNF G.:~ND THEFT AUTO REPORT SUN 415V 952670022 NAT VERBAL DISTURBANCE SAT 10851 952800144 UN? GF~ND THEFT AUTO - INPROGRESS THU 242R 953550001 NAT TRU ASSAULT REPORT THU UNiKPR0 960180187 CAN UN~NO'~ TYPE PROBLEM TUE VE_HCK 943190260 NAT VEHICLE CHECK q3-03 r ' LJ-- " 9/29/97 location 8411 FOOTHILL -841 ] FOOTHILL 841 l FOOTHILL 8411 FOOTHILL 841 ! FOOTHILL 8411 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 84 84 841 841 FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOlHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTH1LL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC FOOTHILL BL ,RCC 8411 FOOTHILL BL ,RCC (;rand Total: Comp date 1996/04/30 11:41:41.00 1997/02/27 22: l 1:26.00 1997/04/10 09:06:56.00 1996/01/18 16:21:27.00 1996/01/24 07:32:54.00 1996/02/02 02:03:50.00 1996/02/27 20:26:46.00 1996/04/30 11:14:55.00 1996/05/02 15:42:40.00 1996/07/02 14:13:02.00 ()1996/08/09 08:23:24.00 ~/1996/08/13 21:20:40.00 1996/08/30 00:07:34.00 1996/09/02 22:21:02.00 1996/09/04 21:15:16.00 1996/09/21 07:15:57.00 1996/09/27 00:23:27.00 1996/! 0/20 18:38:45.00 1996/10/24 19:41:27.00 1997/01/03 02:50:02.00 ! 997/02/08 07:42:50.00 ~{~)1997/03/2507:50:26.00 1997/04/30 17:41:13.00 1997/05/12 00:55:31.00 1997/06/15 15:10:20.00 1997/07/05 10:16:26.00 1997/08/26 15:44:42.00 ,~,997/08/28 15:39:41.00 3 28 nat desc dispo NON INJURY ACCIDEN~I' NRD BAR CHECK NAT SUBJECT CHECK NAT UNKNOWN TYPE PROBLEM CAN TRU GRAND THEFT AUTO REPORT RTF ASSAULT W/DEADLY WEAPON INP RTF HIT AND RUN NON INJURY REPORT RTF NON INJURY ACCIDENT REPORT RTF NON INJURY ACCIDENT NAT MISC THEFT NAT TRU INFORMATION REPORT NAT TRU INFORMATION REPORT CAN BAR CHECK NAT TRU VEHICLE BURGLARY REPORT RTF TRU GRAND THEFT AUTO REPORT RTF TRU INFORMATION REPORT UNF TRU VEHICLE BURGLARY REPORT NRD ASSAULT ARR TRU PETTY THEFT REPORT RTF TRU MALICIOUS MISCHIEF REPORT ARR AUDIBLE ALARM FAL AUDIBLE ALARM FAL ASSAULT NAT PSYCHO INVESTIGATION - INPROG NAT SUBJECT DISTURBANCE ~ '~ NAT NON INJURY ACCIDENT REPORT//i HAZARDOUS CONDITION/SITUATIO NAT SUSPICIOUS VEHICI.F. ~ ~ E ] NAT tqq~, t6 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 93-03, A REQUEST TO EXPAND THE DAYS AND HOURS OF ENTERTAINMENT AND ADD DANCING FOR AN EXISTING BAR AND RESTAURANT WITH OUTDOOR PATIO SEATING, IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 8411 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-571-75. A. Recitals. 1. On May 21, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2. Gary Rousa of the Final Score has filed an application modifying Entertainment Permit No. 93-03, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 3. On October 8, and continued to November 12, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public headngs on the application and concluded said headngs on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearings on October 8, and November 12, 1997, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 8411 Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 545.21 feet and lot depth of 150 feet and is improved with several buildings and structures. b. The property to the north contains a restaurant; the properties to the south contain an abandoned railroad track, single family homes, and townhouses; the property to the west is vacant but planned for a mixed use development consisting of retail, office and mini-storage. c. On February 14, 1996, the applicant received approval from the Planning Commission to have entertainment consisting of live bands and disc jockeys for Friday and Saturday between 8 p.m. and 12 midnight and Sunday between 3 p.m. and 10 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE November 12, 1997 Page 2 d. At the hearing on February 14, 1996, the Planning Commission imposed interior and exterior control measures to address nuisance problems. The control measures are listed in Resolution No. 96-05. The Commission also imposed a condition of approval that required completion of all control measures pdor to commencement of the entertainment use and denied the serving of alcohol within the proposed outdoor patio area. e. The applicant has not completed all the control measures. Therefore, he has not commenced with the approved entertainment. f. However, the applicant has improved the site with a 1,400 square foot fenced outdoor patio area east of the building without the benefit of permits. He complied by serving food and non-alcoholic beverages within this patio area. g. On March 18, 1997, the applicant submitted a request to add dancing and expand the entertainment to nightly between 9 p.m. and 1 a.m. He submitted a related Conditional Use Permit application to expand the bar use for serving alcohol within the outdoor patio area. h. The Entertainment Permit and the related Conditional Use Permit applications were found to have sufficient information on September 24, 1997, and forwarded for Planning Commission consideration at the hearing on October 8, 1997, which was continued to November 12, 1997. i. At the headng on November 12, 1997, the Planning Commission determined that with all the intedor and extedor control measures in place, the loud music and noise from the interior and the nuisance problems in the parking lot can be minimized to an acceptable level. However, the Commission did not approve the serving of alcohol within the outdoor patio area because the Commission determined that would increase the opportunities for exterior nuisance problems which would negatively impact the adjacent residents. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public headng, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare; and b. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, or disorderly manner; and c. That the applicant, or any person associated with him as principal or partner or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of any kind or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude or has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provisions of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; and d. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and e. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding commercial center and adjacent apartment complex; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE November 12, 1997 Page 3 f. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planning Division 1) Approval is granted for the following entertainment uses: a) live bands; b) disc jockeys; and c) dancing; Any change of intensity or type of entertainment shall require a modification to this permit. 2) The days and hours of operation for the entertainment shall be limited to between 8 p.m. and 1 a.m., Thursday through Saturday and 3 p.m. and 10 p.m., Sunday. Any expansion of days and/or hours shall require modification to this permit. 3) No adult entertainment, as defined in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.04.090, shall be permitted. 4) A minimum of one duly licensed, certified or trained, and regularly employed security guard from a reputable secudty firm shall be required to be on the premises from 8 p.m. until two hours after the conclusion of any entertainment. One of the guards shall be in "peace officer" attire and shall remain on duty in the parking area and outside adjacent areas of the facility to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons or anyone in the parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbances. 5) All noise control measures contained in the Final Noise Study and as listed below shall be completed: a) Add acoustic door seals to all exit doors. b) Add interior ceiling with R-11 insulation over the pool room. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE November 12, 1997 Page 4 6) 7) 8) 9) lO) 11) c) Isolate speakers from the structure. d) Remove the two speakers from the roof ceiling and hang only one speaker down from the roof ceiling. e) Upgrade the intedor windows. Detailed plans and/or specifications shall be submitted within 60 days for City Planner and Building Official review and approval, and the building inspected for compliance pdor to commencement of entertainment use. Decorative fencing together with dense landscaping of shrubs and trees along the property line that abuts the railroad tracks shall be provided. Detailed plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted within 60 days for City Planner review and approval. The fence and the landscape shall be completed and inspected to the satisfaction of the City Planner prior to commencement of entertainment use. The row of parking immediately located southwest of the building (parking spaces numbered I through 9 and 35 through 41) shall not be used by the patrons of the Final Score between 8 p.m. and 6 a.m. RESTRICTED PARKING signs shall be posted prior to commencement of entertainment use. Serving of food and non-alcoholic beverages in the outdoor patio area shall cease on and after 9 p.m. The serving of alcoholic drinks is not allowed at any time in the outdoor patio area. All parking and outdoor seating areas shall have a minimum maintained one-foot candle power security lighting. All parking lot light fixtures shall not exceed 15 feet as measured from the finished surface to the top of the light fixture. The light fixtures shall have shields for reducing the glare and shall be odented away from residential areas. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted within 60 days and the lighting installed prior to commencement of entertainment use. No new trash enclosure is required at this time; however, the City Planner may require a trash enclosure, per City Standards, to be provided and completed within 60 days of said notice if the City Planner finds that the trash container is left in public view. Detailed plans to show the completed improvements to date and required new improvements or upgrades such as, but are not limited to, the outdoor patio area, the parking lot, the satellite dishes, the trash enclosure, etc., shall be submitted as a Minor Development Review application within 60 days for City Planner review and approval prior to commencement of entertainment use. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE November 12, 1997 Page 5 12) All doors and windows shall remain closed after 7 p.m. or dudng live entertainment except in the case of emergency. 13) The maximum number of occupants shall not exceed building and fire codes. The maximum occupancy for each room shall be posted as determined by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and/or the City's Fire Prevention Unit Division. 14) The building shall comply with all requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Plans shall be submitted for the Fire Distdct's review and approval within 60 days. The building shall be inspected for compliance pdor to the commencement of the entertainment use. 15) The building shall comply with all requirements of the Uniform Building Code. Plans shall be submitted for the Building Official's review and approval within 60 days. The building and the site shall be inspected for compliance prior to commencement of entertainment use. 16) If the operation of the business creates public safety problems such as but not limited to: loitering and disturbances, noise, overcrowding, blocked fire exits, etc., this entertainment permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration of modification and/or revocation. Failure to comply with the conditions of approval and applicable City Ordinances shall cause the suspension and/or revocation of the Entertainment Permit by the Planning Commission.. 17) Provide a vestibule at the main entrance of the building for sound attenuation. Detailed plans shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The vestibule shall be completed prior to commencement of entertainment use. 18) All conditions of approval shall be satisfied pdor to commencement of the entertainment use. 19) Fencing for the outdoor patio area shall be behind the future property line. Remove the bamboo fencing material. 20) City Planner shall review and approve changes to the parking lot under a Minor Development Review application. 21) Six months after commencement of the entertainment, the Planning Commission will review the permit and assess the success of the control measures. Engineering Division 1) An irrevocable offer of dedication for a total of 64 feet shall be dedicated on Foothill Boulevard, as measured from the centerline, or as approved by Caltrans. 2) An irrevocable offer of dedication for future master planned storm drain improvements shall be dedicated to the satisfaction of the City PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE November 12, 1997 Page 6 Engineer. The easement shall be a minimum of 25 feet wide and generally located west of the developed portion of the site, over the existing drainage swale. 3) Proposed and future improvements to the site shall not be installed within the ultimate right-of-way. 4) The owner shall enter into an agreement acknowledging the elimination of on-site improvements within the ultimate Foothill Boulevard right-of- way at such time as the street is fully improved. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of November 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-11, A REQUEST TO EXPAND THE BAR USE TO INCLUDE THE SERVING OF ALCOHOL WITHIN AN OUTDOOR PATIO AREA FOR AN EXISTING BAR AND RESTAURANT IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 8411 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-571-75. A. Recitals. 1. Gary Rousa has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 97-11, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On October 8, November 12, and December 10, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public hearings on the application and concluded said hearings on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearings on October 8, November 12, and December 10, 1997, including wdtten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 8411 Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 545.21 feet and lot depth of 150 feet and is improved with several buildings and structures; and b. The property to the north contains a restaurant; the properties to the south contain abandoned railread tracks, single family homes, and townhouses; the property to the west is vacant but planned for a mixed use development consisting of retail, office, and mini-storage; and c. The applicant has improved the site with a 1,400 square foot fenced outdoor patio area east of the building; and d. The outdoor patio area is for the serving of food and non-alcoholic drinks in conjunction with a restaurant and is considered an ancillary use and is permitted; and e. The serving of alcohol in the outdoor patio area is considered as an expansion of the bar use which requires a Conditional Use Permit under Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and f. Related to the Conditional Use Permit application is Entertainment Permit 93-03. At the public hearings for Entertainment Permit 93-03 between 1994 and 1998, the Planning Commission received input from adjacent residents who had complained about nuisance problems PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-11 - FINAL SCORE December 10, 1997 Page 2 such as loud music, loud noise, and disturbances. After completion of a Noise Study and the imposing of interior and exterior control measures that addressed these identified nuisance problems, the Commission granted approval of the Entertainment Permit on February 14, 1996; and g. A concern with the serving of alcoholic drinks within the outdoor patio area is the increased opportunities for nuisance problems such as loud noise and loud music spilling out from doors of the building. These nuisance problems would negatively impact the adjacent residents. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is not in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of December 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A MODIFICATION TO ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 93-03, A REQUEST TO EXPAND THE DAYS AND HOURS OF ENTERTAINMENT AND ADD DANCING FOR AN EXISTING BAR AND RESTAURANT WITH OUTDOOR SEATING, IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 8411 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-571-75. A. Recitals. 1. Garry Rousa of the Final Score has filed an application modifying Entertainment Permit No. 93-03, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On October 8, and continued to November 12, and December 10, 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted duly noticed public headngs on the application and concluded said hearings on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 8, November 12, and December 10, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 8411 Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 545.21 feet and lot depth of 150 feet and is presently improved with several buildings and structures. b. The property to the north contains a restaurant, the properties to the south contain an abandoned railroad track, single family homes, and townhouses, and the property to the west is vacant but planned for a mixed use development consisting of retail, office, and mini-storage. c. On February 14, 1996, the applicant received approval from the Planning Commission to have entertainment consisting of live bands and disc jockeys for Friday and Saturday between 8 p.m. and 12 midnight and Sunday between 3 p.m. and 10 p.m. d. At a headng on February 14, 1996, the Planning Commission imposed interior and exterior control measures to address nuisance problems. The control measures are listed in Resolution No. 96-05. The Commission also imposed a condition of approval that required completion of all control measures pdor to commencement of the entertainment use and denied the serving of alcohol within the proposed outdoor patio area. e. The applicant has not completed all the control measures. Therefore, he has not commenced with the approved entertainment. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE December 10, 1997 Page 2 f. On March 18, 1997, the applicant submitted a request to add dancing and expand the entertainment to nightly between 9 p.m. and 1 a.m. He submitted a related Conditional Use Permit application to expand the bar use for serving alcohol within the outdoor patio area. g. Adjacent residents on the south side of the site have submitted letters objecting to expansion of the Entertainment Permit because of possible nuisance problems of loud music, loud noise, loitering, and other related disturbances. h. The Commission felt that it is essential for the applicant to complete the control measures required in February 1996 and commence entertainment for a pedod of time to ensure that the control measures are successful in mitigating the nuisance problem before considering an expansion of the entertainment. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. b. The granting of the application would create a public nuisance. c. The normal operation of the premises would interfere with the normal peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhood. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1996. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of December 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. MOD. TO EP 93-03 - FINAL SCORE December 10, 1997 Page 3 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 10, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-38 - DESPERADO'S - A request to establish a bar in conjunction with a restaurant that offers entertainment within Thomas Winery Plaza, in the Special Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 208-101-23. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 97-04 - DESPERADO'S A request to offer entertainment consisting of dancing, disc jockeys, concerts, and live bands in conjunction with a bar and restaurant within the Thomas Winery Plaza, in the Special Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard -APN: 208-101-23. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Site Characteristics and Surroundinq Land Use: The site is fully improved as a specialty mixed use retail center. It contains the historically landmarked Thomas Winery and Still buildings. South of the site, the property is zoned commercial and developed with a gas station, a liquor store, and an In-N-Out fast food restaurant. The property east of the site is zoned commercial and developed with a commercial center. The property to the west of the site is zoned commercial and planned for a Lucky's/Sav-On commercial center. The area north of the site is developed with commercial buildings and is part of the Thomas Winery Plaza. Parkinc~ Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Commercial center with 15% food users* Food users over 15% 9,424 Health Club 14,406 Billiard Parlor w/20 tables 8,732 67,656 4.5/1,000 305 10/1,000 94 6.7/1,000 96 2/table 40 535 529 * 15 percent is 15,033 square feet. The total square footage for food users including the proposed bar and restaurant is 24,457 square feet, which is 24.4 percent of the total center. ITEMS E & F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-38 & EP 97-04 - DESPERADO'S December 10, 1997 Page 2 ANALYSIS: Ao Proposed Uses: The applicant, Mr. Ron Bozarth, proposes to take the historically landmarked Thomas Winery (formerly Roadhouse Cafe) and establish a country western nightclub that offers limited food service, full bar service, dancing, and entertainment. The leased space is approximately 5,300 square feet. The hours of operation for the bar and entertainment are 4 p.m. to 2 a.m., Tuesday through Saturday; 3 p.m. to 2 a.m. Sunday; and closed on Monday except for special concerts, fund raisers, and private parties. The proposed entertainment is: the use of disc jockeys, offering dance lessons with dance instructors, dancing, and concerts from live country western bands 6 to 12 times a year. The facility may also be used for fund raisers and private parties such as weddings, birthdays, and service clubs. Exhibit "B" is a detailed description of the proposed operation of Desperado's. One management person and 11 kitchen and floor personnel will be available per shift. Two security personnel, one inside the facility and one outside in the parking area, will be available at all times when the facility is open until closing. One additional security person inside the facility will be available on Friday and Saturday. All security personnel will be wearing distinctive shirts identifying them as such. Bo Compatibility of Use: The site is surrounded by developed and planned commercial centers. The closest residential area is north of San Bernardino Road which is more than 600 feet away. The center is not fully leased. The two-story building at the northern portion of the site along the San Bernardino Street frontage is approved for office and retail uses but currently has only one tenant. The buildings along the eastern property boundary have several unleased units. The businesses within Thomas Winery Plaza are a mix of a health club, liquor store, cafe, billiard parlor, retails stores, and restaurants. Both Cue 'N View Billiards and Zendejas Restaurant have bars that serve alcoholic drinks. An Italian restaurant, Chianti, is under construction for interior improvements, which include a bar that serves alcoholic drinks. Both Zendejas Restaurant and Koffee Klatch have approved Entertainment Permits. Zendejas offers live bands Thursday through Saturday between 5:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m., while Koffee Klatch offer live music performances Monday through Friday between 7:30 p.m. and 1 a.m. and on Saturday and Sunday between 12:00 noon and I a.m. Outdoor entertainment is allowed for Koffee Klatch. Staff believes that the addition of a country western nightclub with food, bar, and dancing would not conflict with Koffee Klatch or Zendejas and would be compatible with the surrounding uses. Historic Artifacts: Thomas Winery is a locally designated historic landmark. Historic artifacts such as the conveyor belt and the stairs to the upper floor storage area have been restored in place. The applicant has agreed not to remove them but will maintain them in good condition. Previous restaurants, Knowlwood/Roadhouse Cafe were required to include information about the Thomas Winery and Still buildings in the menu. Staff has placed a condition of approval that requires the applicant to incorporate a short history of the winery building into the food and drinks menu. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-38 & EP 97-04 - DESPERADO'S December 10, 1997 Page 3 D. Public Safety Concerns: Police and Fire Safety: The Police Department has reviewed the proposed uses and determined that the applicant has addressed the issues of safety by providing adequate security personnel. The applicant has contacted the Building and Safety Division/Fire Prevention Unit's staff to review the requirements for occupancy of the building. A condition of approval has been included that requires the applicant to meet all applicable codes for any interior modifications and improvements and that the building be inspected before occupancy. Security Plan: The applicant proposes to have one security person in the parking lot and one inside the building for each night of entertainment. The City's Entertainment Ordinance requires a "duly licensed and uniformed guard at all times" during dancing where the dance floor area exceeds 150 square feet, as in this case. One additional security person will be added inside the building and outside the parking lot on Friday and Saturday. All security personnel will wear distinctive shirts with "security" prominently displayed on the front and back. Staff believes that the proposed security plan is adequate since the Police Department has accepted it. Based on past experiences with previous nightclubs (Harry C's or Backwaters), staff believes special events such as concerts by live bands may require additional security personnel for monitoring the parking lot and directing on-site traffic. Staff has placed a condition of approval requiring a special security and safety plan to be submitted for the City's review one month before the scheduled event or concert. The purpose is to assess the level of security personnel to ensure public safety. Parking: The parking spaces required for the site are 535, which was based on the type and square footage of the uses within the center. The site has 529 parking spaces which leaves a shortfall of 8 spaces. The property manager of the center has submitted a parking study to show that there could be a joint use of the parking spaces on site. The parking study was done in response to staff's concerns about adding another 4,700 square foot restaurant and bar (Chianti) in the center last June. The study included the square footage for all restaurant uses, vacant (Thomas Winery) or existing, within the center. The study stated that the uses within the center, such as restaurants, offices, retail stores, health club, and billiard parlor, have different peak demand for the number of parking spaces. Therefore, shared or joint use of the available parking spaces is appropriate. Based on the assumption of 100 percent occupancy within the center, the projected parking demand is 85 percent of the available 529 parking spaces. The peak demand is estimated to occur on Fridays in December with 451 (85 percent) spaces occupied. The parking study concluded there were ample parking spaces to accommodate all the restaurants in the center. Staff concurs with the findings and conclusions of the parking study that the number of parking spaces is sufficient to accommodate the mix of uses within the center including the proposed uses. Exhibit "E" is a copy of the parking study. Conclusion: Based on the above analysis, staff believes that the proposed uses would be compatible with the surrounding uses and comply with the objectives of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-38 & EP 97-04 - DESPERADO'S December 10, 1997 Page 4 FACTS FOR FINDING: The Commission must make all of the following findings to approve the two applications: A. Conditional Use Permit: That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the District in which the site is located. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. B Entertainment Permit: That the conduct of the establishment or the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, or disorderly manner. That the applicant, or any person associated with him as principal or partner or in a position, or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offenses involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of any kind or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude or has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sales of alcohol or the provision of entertainment been revoked within the preceding five years. 4. That the granting of the application would not create a public nuisance. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of any surrounding residential neighborhoods. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement or material fact in the required application. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site and all the tenants within the Thomas Winery Plaza. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-38 & EP 97-04 - DESPERADO'S December 10, 1997 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the nightclub, bar, and entertainment through the adoption of the attached Resolution. Staff recommends a six-month review after the entertainment has commenced. Respect~ Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "B" Applicant's Letter Exhibit"C" - Site Plan Exhibit"D" - Floor Plan Exhibit "E" Parking Study, June 1997 Resolution of Approval for CUP 97-38 Resolution of Approval for EP 97-04 ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DESPERADOS is to be a Country Western Bar/Restaurant with dancing. The music for the dancing will be supplied by a Disc Jockey who will work 6 nights a week. We will offer free dance lessons from a Dance Instructor 6 nights a week. We will charge an admission fee of $3.00 per person on Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. We will charge an admission fee of $5.00 per person on Friday and Saturday. The Admission charge will be waived for those who come in prior to 7:00 p.m. Our hours of operation: Sunday: 3:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. - We plan on having family day on Sundays so that parents can bring their children for a meal and entertainment geared toward the family. All underage children must be accompanied by an adult, all underage children will be removed by 9:00 p.m. A Disc Jockey will provide entertainment from 3:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. Dance lessons will be provided by a Dance Instructor from 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. and from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday: Closed except for the following: Concerts with live Country Western Bands 6 to 12 times a year, fund raisers for worthy causes when requested, and private parties. A Disc Jockey and Dance Instructor may be used for these events. Times will vary but we will not open before noon for private parties or before 5:00 p.m. for concerts. Tuesday: 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. A Disc Jockey ~vill provide entertainment from 6:00 p.m. to closing Dance lessons will be provided by a Dance Instructor from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Wednesday: 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. A Disc Jockey will provide entertainment from 6:00 p.m. to closing Dance lessons will be provided by a Dance Instructor from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Thursday: 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. A Disc Jockey will provide entertainment from 6:00 p.m. to closing Dance lessons will be provided by a Dance Instructor from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. q _~.1L Friday: 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. A Disc Jockey will provide entertainment from 6:00 p.m. to closing Dance lessons will be provided by a Dance Instructor from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Saturday: 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. A Disc Jockey will provide entertainment from 6:00 p.m. to closing Dance lessons will be provided by a Dance Instructor from 7:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. DESPERADOS v~411 be available for private parties, weddings, birthdays, service clubs etc. during the day but will not open before noon for these events. A Disc Jockey and Dance Instructor may be used during these events. Staff: There will be 6 waiters/waitresses per shift. There will be 1 Bartenders & 1 Barback per shift. There will be 3 Kitchen staff per shift. There will be 1 Management staff per shift. Security: There will be one security person in the parking area from dusk to closing every night we are open. If the need arises we will place an additional security person in the parking area on Friday and Saturday. There xvill be one security person inside each night from opening to closing and two security persons from 8:00 p.m. to closing on Friday and Saturday nights. All Security personnel will wear distinctive shirts with SECURITY prominently displayed on the front and back. Respectively Submitted, Ron~/ld E. Bozarth~ President-'C.%V. Dancers, Inc. Thomas Wine,'y Plaza RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ~LI_LLIJ 11 I.IJAJ_11111.11111 I_11 I.I I 1111111 F--'~ Highland Ave. GMS REALTY, LLC · 1.. 1--dl ..... I , ~ c ~v ~.THOMAS WINERY PLAZA ~ ~= ~ PARKING STUDY [RE.VlSE.DI _ Rancho Cucamonga, California ~ ~ rtancho ~ucamonga Pile'tiling Division '~'~{ ;t ~ ___. ~ ~.......~ ~ '~ O'""'"'"'"'" RKJK ROBERT KAHN , IOHN KAIN ~, ASSOCIATES INC. RECEIVED May 9, 1997 MAY 1 1997 Mr. Gary Smith GMS REALTY SERVICES 462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 206 Solana Beach, CA 92075 City ot Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Subject: Thomas Winery Plaza Parking Study (Revised) Dear Mr. Smith: ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. (RKJK) is pleased to provide this revised Parking Study for the Thomas Winery Plaza. This report has analyzed the parking demand for the proposed mix of uses to be included in the Thomas Winery Plaza located east of Vineyard Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard (SR-66) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The study has utilized the shared parking analysis procedures developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and discussed with City staff. The results of the Parking Study prepared by RKJK have indicated that the parking provided within Thomas Winery Plaza is projected to be well within the peak parking demand requirements for the proposed mix of uses within the commercial center. Weekday parking demand has been evaluated along with the monthly/hourly variations. If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to give us a call at (714) 474-0809. Sincerely, ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Senior Associate JK:CB:nam/6816 JN:920-97-001 Attachments Fax: -1-', THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PARKING STUDY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (REVISED) Prepared for: GMS REALTY SERVICES 462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 206 Solana Beach, CA 92075 Prepared by: ROBERT KAHN, JOHN KAIN & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1601 Dove Street, Suite 290 Newport Beach, CA 92660 John Kain, AICP Carl Ballard May 9, 1997 JN:920-97-001 JK:CB:nam/6816 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION INTRODUCTION PROJECT LAND USES AND CODE REQUIREMENTS ................ SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS ............................... CONCLUSIONS ......................................... PAGE 1 5 8 11 15 APPENDICES URBAN LAND INSTITUTE (ULI) SHARED PARKING STUDY ........... SHARED PARKING COMPUTER OUTPUT ....................... A B LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A B C D PAGE. 3 LOCATION MAP ................................. 4. SITE PLAN .................................... 6 PARKING ZONE MAP ............................. HOURLY PARKING DEMANDS ....................... 13 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 2 3 4 THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PARKING SURVEY (5/2/97) ........ THOMAS WINERY PLAZA LAND USE SUMMARY ............ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARKING CODE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES .......................... THOMAS WINERY PLAZA MONTHLY PEAK PARKING DEMAND . . PAGE 10 14 THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PARKING STUDY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION This parking study has been prepared to establish the appropriate amount of parking to be provided for the Thomas Winery Plaza in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Parking Code permits off-street parking requirements to be established based upon a detailed parking study for this type of mixed use commercial center. The specific purpose of the parking study includes the following: 1. Review the parking requirements for the mix of land uses within the proposed development. 2. Prepare a shared parking analysis for the Thomas Winery Plaza by utilizing procedures developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULI). The Thomas Winery Plaza is an existing mixed use commercial center. The site is located east of Vineyard Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard (SR-66), as shown on Exhibit A. The site plan for the Thomas Winery Plaza is shown on Exhibit B. The existing and proposed project land uses within the site include retail, restaurants, office, entertainment (billiards) and health club uses. The project land uses are compatible with one another and lend themselves to the use of shared parking. In addition, several uses are complementary (i.e., office, restaurants, etc.) and some people will attend several uses in only one trip. For example, people going to the restaurants may also shop at the retail during the same time period, therefore, reducing the typical amount of parking demand required for the two individual uses. In addition, peak parking demand for the office will occur at a time when the majority of the retail use has a lower parking demand. The multi-use nature of the Thomas Winery Plaza lends itself to the reduction in overall parking generation as a result of the mix of land uses within the commercial center. 2 EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP SAN BERNARDINO ROAD SITE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD g20-g7--001:01A THOklA5 WINEI~I' PLAZA, Rancho Cucamon(}a."i~'"~'Tifornlo EXHIBIT B SITE PLAN 920-97-001:02A THOMAS WINERY PI~.ZA. Rancho Cucamongo, Callfornio RKJK ~o~rl' ~ * ~ ~ k ~,SOC~IT~ i~c. M~Y-~i-I~? 11:1~5 RK~K 4740~0~ P.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS .._ The site is partially occupied and is generating perking demand for the occupied buildings. The Thomas Winery Plaza currently provides 529 parking spaces. The 529 parking spaces was confirmed by RKJK during a site visit with two physical counts. In order to evatuate existing conditions, a parking survey of the Thomas Winery Plaza was conducted on Friday, May 2, 1997. Based on discussions with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff, the parking demand was monitored from 11:30 AM to 1:30 PM and 5:30 PM to 7:30 PM. For the existing parking demand counts, the project site was separated into parking zones (see Exhibit C). Each parking zone was counted on a 15-minute basis during the periods of this parking survey. The results of the parking survey for Friday (weekday) conditions are shown in Table 1. EXHIBIT C PARKING ZONE MAP -1111111111 IllIll IIII11 '; II LEGEND, (~- ZONE LETTER ~- ZONE BOUNDARY 920-97-001 TdOMA.S WINERY PLAZA. Rcncno Cucomonge, Colifornia RKJK TABLE 1 THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PARKING SURVEY (5/2J97) TIME Parking Spaces Available 11:30 AM - 11:45 AM 11:45 AM - 12:00 PM 12:00 PM - 12:15 PM 12:15 PM - 12:30 PM 12:30 PM- 12:45 PM 12:45 PM - 1:00 PM 1:00 PM- 1:15 PM 1:15 PM - 1:30 PM 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 6:00 PM - 6:15 PM 6:15 PM - 6:30 PM 6:30 PM - 6:45 PM 6:45 PM - 7:00 PM 7:00 PM - 7:15 PM 7:15 PM- 7:30 PM A I B~LC 77 30 42 14 -d0 3 12 9 11 7 13 8 15 10 11 12 12 11 8 10 14 9 14 10 14 12 14 11 15 11 15 10 16 10 17 9 PARKING ZONE D I .E~I El ,,_4__5. 136 107 30 -38 12 3 36 46 5 1 40 57 8 4 44 64 9 6'- 42 77 10 10 32 70 6 8 28 65 8 7 27 54 7 17 36 89 26 16 40 90 26 16 34 103 21 16 38 101 21 14 38 107 18 14 37 114 17 14 43 115, 24 14 44.d23', .27 33 51 529 8 3 118 5 3 119 8 3 135 9 3 154 8 4 172 7 4 152 3 4 139 3 4 120 12 8 211 12 8 216 15 9 224 15 9 225 17 9 229 18 9 234 11 12 245 12 12 258 PROJECT LAND USES AND CODE REQUIREMENTS Peak parking demand for each existing and proposed land use in the Thomas Winery Plaza was estimated using the City of Rancho Cucamonga Parking Code for all land uses. The various land uses included in the site plan were evaluated and the amount of building square footage was determined as sh'own in Table 2. Based upon the City of Rancho Cucamonga Parking Code requirements for individual uses, total parking required for the site would be 535 parking spaces (6 spaces more than available) as shown in Table 3. However, as previously noted the City of Rancho Cucamonga Parking Code does permit an evaluation of mixed use projects to take into account the multiple trips that people make within these types of centers. The types and quantities of the various land uses in combination with the peak parking demand rates shown in Table 3 were utilized to determine the total parking demand for the center. 8 TABLE 2 THOMAS WINERY PLAZA LAND USE SUMMARY EXISTING/ PROPOSED BUILDING TENANT LAND USEt QUANTITY UNITS= A-1 Souplantation Restaurant 7,668 SF B-1 California Glitz Retail 1,400 SF B-2 Shopping Center Office Office 1,400 SF B-3 Vacant Retail 1,400 SF B-4 Vacant Retail 1,400 SF B-5 Vacant Retail 1,400 SF B-6 Vacant Retail 1,600 SF B-7 Postal Pl~za Retail 1,200 SF B-8 Little Caeser's Fast Food 1,4(X) SF B-10 Winds~' Cottage Retail 2,673 SF C-1 Vacant Retail 2,016 SF C-2 Fast Frame Retail 2,000 SF D-1 Saddlebeck Sports Fitness 12,506 SF D-2 Vacant Fitness 1,900 SF D-3 Vacant Retail 1,970 SF D-.4 Vacant Retail 2,067 SF D-5 Vacant Retail 2,224 SF D-8 Vacant Retail 2.224 SF D-7 Zendejas Restaurant 5,382 SF F-1 Vacant Retail 1,194 SF F-2 Vacant Retail 1,138 SF F.3 Vacant Retail 1,138 SF F-.4 Vacant RMail 1,138 SF F-5 Route 66 Museum Retail 1,138 SF F-6 Vacant Retail 1,138 SF F-7 Vacant Red, all 2,245 SF F-8 Real Estate Office Office 1,512 SF F-9 Vacant Re~il 860 SF F-10 Vacant Retail 860 SF F-11 Vacant Retail 860 SF F-12 Vacant Retail 838 SF F-13 Vacant Retail 1.058 SF G-1 Cues & Views Billiard3 8.732 SF H-1 Piece of Reef Retail 1,484 SF H-2 Vacant Retail 1,512 SF 1-1 Vacant Restaurant 1.274 SF I-2 Vacant Restaurant 1.224 SF I-3 Vacant Retail 726 SF I-4 Freq. Paging Retail 726 SF I-5 Hair Secrets Retail 64~ SF I-6 Vacant Restaurant 1,152 SF I-7 Vacant Restaurant 1,1 52 SF I-8 Vacant Retail 1,056 SF I-9 Haven Chiropractic Office 1,959 SF K-1 Vacant Restaurant 5,300 SF K-2 Vacant Restaurant 1,305 SF K-3 Wild GraDe Retail 2,194 SF L-1 Wild GraDe Retail 829 SF TOTAL I 100,218 ~ No add'~.ional food uses o~her than t~3se ILsted within table. = SF = Square Feet 3 20 tables TABLE 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARKING CODE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES LAND USE PARKING RATE QUANTITY UNITS~ Retail 4.5 Parking Spaces per 47,752 SF 1,000 Square Feet Restaurant'.. 4.5 Parking Spaces per 24,457 SF /: -- ' ' 1,000Square Feet, If over 15% of center is ,... - food service, 1 additional ' ' ;;" space per 100 square .... feet2 Health Club I Parking Space per 150 14,406 SF Square Feet Billiards 2 Parking Spaces per 8,732 SF Billiard Table (20 Tables) Office 4.5 Parking Spaces per 4,871 SF 1,000 Square Feet ITOTAL I 100,2181 SF NUMBER OF SPACES REQUIRED 215 .-.: 162 .~..~ ,.~ ? 96 4{3 22 5351 SF = Square Feet 15% of the total center is 15,033 square feet. The remainder is 9,424 square feet. SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS RKJK has used the procedures developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) from its 1983 publication titled "Shared Parking". A summary of the ULI study is included in Appendix "A". The ULI shared parking analysis evaluates the types of land uses, parking rates, monthly variations of parking demand by land use, and the hourly distribution of peak parking demand for each type of land use. The ULI procedures were utilized in this study to evaluate peak parking demand which would occur for the Thomas Winery Plaza with 100% occupancy. Each month of the year was evaluated and the peak parking demand for a weekday was determined utilizing data contained in the ULI Shared Parking report and the operational characteristics of the existing and proposed land uses within the center. A computer program was developed to analyze the shared parking within the Thomas Winery Plaza. The program was consistent with the procedures included in the ULI shared parking publication. The following inputs were included within the shared parking computer program for each land use: 1. Peak parking demand by land use. 2. Weekday adjustment factors. 3. Monthly adjustment factors to account for variations in parking demand over the year. 4. Hourly distribution of parking demand based upon the ULI data and operational characteristics of the proposed land uses. 11 Since the peak parking demand for each land use occurs at a different hour and also varies by month and day of the week, the peak parking demand is not solely determined by adding the individual peak parking required for each land use. Exhibit D indicates the hourly variation of parking demand for each land use within the Thomas Winery Plaza. As can be seen by this exhibit, peak parking demand for each land use does not occur at the same time. Based upon this study, it was found that the month of December resulted in the highest peak parking demand during the year for the Thomas Winery Plaza. Examples of the computer output for the various months is included in Appendix "B" and a summary of the peak parking demand for each month is included in Table 4. As can be seen by Table 4, the maximum parking demand on a weekday occurs in December and is equal to 451 parking spaces (78 spaces would be available). 12 EXHIBIT D HOURLY PARKING DEMANBS THOMAS WINERY PLAZA WEEKDAY HOURLY PARKING ACCUMULATION 300 - 250 - 150 - RETAIL RESTAURANT HEALTH CLUB ENTERTAINMENT OFFICE TOTAL TIME OF DAY 920-97-0Ol :04A THOMAS WtNER¥ PLAZ.~ Roncho Cucomonga, C~311fornla RKJK TABLE 4 THOMAS WINERY PLAZA MONTHLY PEAK PARKING DEMAND I MONTH I WEEKDAY I January 388 February 380 March 413 Apdi 413 May 421 June 438 July 438 August 414 September 406 October 406 November 406 December~ 451 Maximum Demand 451 IParking Spaces Provided I 5291 IPercent of Required I 85%1 Peak month for weekdays. ?~4Y-21-1997 11:0S R~J~ d?~0902 P.02 CONCLUSIONS There are 529 existing parking spaces currently provided at the Thomas Winery Plaza. The 529 existing parking spaces was confirmed by RKJK during a site visit with two physical counts. 2. Existing occupied uses at the site generate a peak Friday parking demand of 258 parked vehicles between 7:15 PM and 7:30 PM. The direct parking code requirements for the proposed ultimate mix of uses at the site amount to 535 spaces (6 spaces more than available). However, the mix of uses do not generate parking demands at the same time. This study has shown that the shared peak demand is 451 spaces (78 spaces would be available). ,. Assuming 100% occupancy of the commercial center, the shared peak parking demand is approximately 85% of the spaces provided, which appears to be more than acceptab[e. Due to the nature of land uses that are existing and planned within the Thomas Winery Plaza, the shared parking concept is appropriate. For example, peak parking demand for the office uses will occur during late morning and evening afternoon, whereas peak parking demand/or the restaurant uses will occur later in the evening when there is less demand for the office uses. o The Thomas Winery Plaza peak parking demand is estimated to occur during the month of December on Fridays, with the estimated peak demand of 451 space~ being occupied. 15 TOTRL P.02 Some visitors to Thomas Winery Plaza are expected to visit multiple uses on site (e.g., shopping before having dinner). No credit or reduction in anticipated parking demand has been taken for this effect. The estimated parking demand presented in this study is therefore inherently conservative, and actual parking demand could be lower. 16 APPENDIX A URBAN LAND INSTITUTE (ULI) SHARED PARKING STUDY rSLI~ study l~rovides an methodology. analysis and a predictive One of the most imt~ortant elements fie_veloDment ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~_~.~ !. ', mixed-use/multi-use SHARED PARKING DEMAND FOR SELECI'ED LAND USES Barton-Aschrnan Associates, Inc. In 1982-1983, ULI. unth special funding from rrvan'~ sources. engaged Barton-Aschrnan Aasocmtes. Inc. to dertake a study of the shared parking phenomenon. Thi~ ar- tzcle summarizes the objectives. findings. and recornmenda- twna of the study. A published report and a computer pro- grarn wtll be az,ailable later th~s fall. Richard j. Hocking. vzce president. Y;e,l S. Kentg. z~ice president. and John R. W'roble. assoczate. .','ere project coordinators for Barton- Aschman. .',,hich is headquartered m £:,amton. Illinois. --Editor shared parking is defined as parking space that can be used to ser~'e two or more individual land uses without conflict or encroachment. The shared parking phenomenon has long been ob- serx'ed in central business districts. suburban com- munities. and other areas where land uses are combined. h is the result of two conditions: · Variations in the peak accumulation of parked ve- hicles due to time differences in the activity pat- terns of adjacent or nearby land uses Iby hour. by day. by season). For example. a parking facilitv can be used by office employees dunng the day and sewe patrons of an adjacent theater at night. · Relationships among land use activities that result in people being attracted to two or more land uses on a single auto trip to a g'iven area or develop- ment. While the existence of shared parking is recog- nized by developers and public officials. typical zon- ing codes do not explicitlv provide for it. Instead. most zoning codes are expressed in terms of peak parking indices or ratios for major types of individu- al land uses. While the peak ratios reflect the differ- ences in parking demand generated bv separate land uses and under certain conditions. they do not re- flect the fact that total or combined peak parking de- mand can be significandv less than the sum of the individual peak demand values. Mixed-use developments. iuch as Water To,~er Place in Chicago. highlight the need to pt:,n for shared parking. Studv Objective Exen thoueh the shared parking phenomenon commonly o(curs in a number of specific cases. iittle literature ts available that formatIx' documents the c~rcumstances of shared parking or provides guide- !iv. es for quantifvin~ the extent of shared parking. There is no accepted method for predicting and quantifvin~ shared parking opportunities under a x, ide range of possible conditions. Thus. research ob- jectix'es ~,'ere to' · identify the primary independent variables affect- in~ parking demand in shared parking situations !i.e.. for developments inxotvmg tx,o or more land uses): · identif~ the relative effects and universality of those xariables: and · alex elop a standard methodotoe;v for analvzinz shared parking. 2 September Procedure l):u-king demand c:m I)e t)l)serve(I :it existing ,nixed-use dexdupmems. If such prqiecls have their ,~wn parking kzcilities. it is p,~ssibl~ to count th~ uc- cttmulation of parked vehic'le~ and determine the peak parking demand. The latter would represent an ;tRgre~;tte value h~r all of the land uses in the de- velopmere. The issue for research. however. was how this aggregate value compared t() the sum ()f the peak parking demand fin' the individual land uses. That is. in order to study shared parking. it was nec- essary to stud;'. independently. the parking space m;md characteristics of each component of a mixed- use deveh~pment :red to estimate the effects (m de- m;tntJ (Jue to the c()n~bin;tli(m of these uses. 'Elms. the first step x, as to stud;' the parking space demand generated hv significant individual land uses in situations where unit peak parking demand w~mld ~ at maximun~ levels. Typical treestanding subur- ban lanct uses produce maximum unit parking dr- mand prim;trilv because sufficient parking space is :~vail;tble and transit u.sc is insignificant. By first idenui'viuq parkin~ dmn:md at ~ttch "unt'~m~tr:tincc[- treeMandin~ ~in~ic land tines. ~thcr ct'['et'ts ,uch mm~it u~c and capme tn;trkct relati~)nship~ omld Analysis The results of the first step t)f the :,hah sis estab- lishe(t parking space demit,~d characteristics ;,t six ~in~le land uses. delined in terms of peak unit de- mand. hourly accumulation. and seasonal ~ariation. Peak unit demands I~ee Figure I) ~,ere de~eh~pcd ¢~n the basis of occupied land use units and negligible Figure 1 Representative Peak Parking Demand Factors Land Use Unit Re~denual P~r~m~ ~p,~ces Hotel Guest R~m Park~n~ ~p;tces Restauranu Lounge P:u'kzn~ space~ (:onference R,~ms Purkln~ .;})aces Weekday Saturday per l,I)()~l ,,q.['t. (.;LA 3.00 0.50 per [.()IH) ~q.[t. G14. 3.81) 4.00 per l.OOO ~q.ft. GLA 3.,qO 5.00 per 1.00o sq.ft. GLA 20.11() 20.00 per seat 0.25 0.30 per dx~etling unit~ l.l)O |.00 per room I .-~- '1 :~5"-' per 1.000 sq.ft. GL-X IO.00 10.00 per sent'~ 0.50 0.50 per 1.1)¢11} sq.ft. (;LA:~ 30.I)O 30.00 the t{l~,~'11 r.lt,c~, 111tl'..tie Ul}I~Cr b~,t/nd$ that are xer'x ~.treb.' ;tthiexetl. _';F__,_.~T.:J.~ LT: ~--t'i')., ,':,;eptcmbcr 83 3 Figure 2 Hourly Parking Accumulation Curves for Individual Land-uses Shared parking may occur in suburban developments if walking distances a~e not far and land uses are functionally related. transit use. thus representing the maximum parking accumulation occurring on a given day. Hourly ac- cumulation curves (developed from hourly counts at freestanding developments) for each individual land use (see Figure 2) indicate the variation in parking accumulation throughout a given day. Seasonal vari- ation in parking demand at each land use Isee Figure 31 was developed from management data supplied by developers and in-house historical data. The peak parking demands calculated from the parking de- mand factors in Figure 1 correspond to 100 percent of peak parking accumulation for each land u~e indi- cated on the hourly curves in Figure 2 and the monthly data in Figure 3. Bv combining the results for single land u~es with survev data for mixed-use developments. it was pos- sible to document the effects of shared parking on total parking space requirements. This was shown in terms of the reduced number of parking spaces needed to ser~'e peak activity periods. The survey data also disclosed the potential for multiple "levels of reduction" in parking space based on the different impacts of time and inter-land use Figure 3 Representative Monthly Variations as Percent of Peak Month Hotel Hotel Rooms Rooms Hotel Hotel Month CH~ce Retail Restaurant Cinema Residential Weekday Saturday Conference Convention january. 100% 65% 80,% 90% 100% 90,% 65% 100% 20% February 1 O0 65 75 70 100 90 70 1 O0 40 March 100 70 90 50 100 95 80 100 80 April 100 70 90 70 100 95 85 100 80 May I00 70 95 70 100 95 '~5 -lO0 t0~ june 1O0 75 100 100 100 100 90 100 100 July I00 75 100 100 100 I00 100 100 50 August 100 75 85 70 100 100 100 100 50 September 100 75 80 80 100 95 90 100 70 October 100 75 80 70 100 95 90 100 70 November 100 80 80 50 100 85 80 100 40 December 100 I00 90 50 100 85 65 I00 20 4 September Figure 4 Captive Market Effects--Percent of Employees Who Are Also Patrons In Same Or Nearby Development Single-U~e Site~ Mixed-Use Site~ All Sites CBD Range Non-CBD Range Site Site .99% O-~76% 19% - 0-78% 61 22-85 28 0-83 43 O-85 24 O-83 relationships. Depending on the particular land uses involved and other site-specific characteristics. park- ing space reductions resulted from one or more of the effects of(1) hourIv. daily. and seasonal offsets in parking accumulation patterns of individual land uses and ('2_) relationships among land use activities that resulted in people using more than one land use on a single auto trip. i.e.. captive market effects. The captive market effect on parking demand at a partic- ular m~xed-use development was dependent upon specific market conditions. The range of possible market conditions was reflected in the data obtained from survey questionnaires. Agg'regate results of em- ployee surveys indicated that the percentage of all employees who were also patrons at a particular de- ,,elopment ranged from 0 to 85 percent. However. on the average. there was a significant increase in employee patrons in central business district ~CBD) developments relative to non-CBD developments and in combined-use developments relative to single- use developments. These results are summarized in Figure 4. Using the single-use analysis results. Fieure 3. for example. illustrates the impact of time of(sets m parking demand when 400.000 square feet IGLA oc- cupied) of office space and 1.° million square feet (GLA occupied) of retail space are combined. On v,.eekdavs. retail parking demand is lower than Satur- day. but competes with office parking demand. The opportunity for shared parking results from having to provide the peak ~,'eekend retail parking demand for the development as a ,,,'hole and when the office parking demand is at its lowest. in order to demonstrate the potential magnitude of shared parking effects. the parking demand find- ings for individual land uses were used to estimate demand for mLxed-use developments. These results ,,,'ere compared to the actual peak parking accumula- tion counts to identify the difference. This test in- volred three steps as follows: · Compute gross peak parking demand. · Compute shared parking demand. · Compare results to actual parking demand. Figure 5 O~ceJRetail Parking Accumulations (400,000 sq. ft. office and 1,200,000 sq. ft. retail) /September 83 5 Figure 6 summarizes the results of the test. An im- portant qualification to the results is that the ob- sen'ed parking count (Column 4) does not necessarily represent a "design value" for the devel- opment. It is not known if each project was operat- ing at maximum levels of trip generation or if business volumes were significantly lower for the project due to the slow economy or other factors. Specifically. it is known that those projects exhibiting an unusually low actual accumulation were being af- fected bv site factors. Projects 10. 11. 13. 16. and 17 were experiencing lower occupancy at hotel compo- nents. This is significant since the values in Column 3 were computed assuming 100 percent occupancy. Further. some projects were surveyed assuming that all parking demand was being served bv on-site facil- ities. Projects 13 and 15. however. may reflect a dif- ferent situation. since there is a substantial amount of "other" parking space available. For Project 13. it is known that such parking is used significantly bv employees. Findings With the above qualifications in mind. Figure 6 in- dicates: · The parking demand estimated by adding the indi- vidual peaks produced results that were consis- tently high. · Estimating shared parking demand using time dif- ferentials will. if properly constructed. be more re- liable than estimating gross parking demand. · When conservative values are used for peak park- ing and hourly factors. estimated shared parking demand will be higher than actual parking ac- cumulation. In addition. there often tinres are other relationships. such as captive market effects. which lower aggregate parking demand. Figure 6 Results of Test Cases M&xed. Us~ Project TT[~ t. Office/Retail 2. Officea'Re ta~l 3. Office/Retail 4. Office/Retail 5.0 ffice:~etail 6. OfficeJEntertainment 7. Office/Entertainment 8. Office/Entertainment 9. Office/Hotel 10. Office/Hotel/ Entertainment 11. Office/Hotel/ Entertmnment 12. Office/Hotel/ Entertmnment 13. Office/Retail/Hotel/ Entertmnment 14. O ffice/RetaW Entertmnment 15. Officw'Retail/ Entertmnment 16. Officef Hotel/ Entertmnment 17. Office/Hotel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Percem of Percent Estimated Overestimntion S~vi~ gs Single-Use Shar~i~ Gross Gross Gross Pzrking Peak Peak Pe~k Peak Accumulation to to Shared (spaces) Actual Actual Peak 5.749 5.858 5.2~9 &$70 3% - 6% 9% 2.936 3.744 2.758 2.352 2~ 19 6 oo -3 25 772 900 617 633 ,~ o 2.592 9 - 12 21 2.$14 3.048 .._91 162 196 154 154 5 0 5 1.458 1,879 1,326 I. 163 25 14 812 1,016 714 464 75 54 21 1,724 2.112 1.501 614 [81 144 37 I. 145 1.399 1.006 882 30 14 16 1.627 1.933 1,323 725 124 82 42 1.236 1.452 990 525 135 $9 46 784 862 659 $09 - 3 - 19 -- ..~8~ 264 85 179 8,316 9,610 4.242 o o - 869 1.094 754 600 45 26 19 5.099 5.157 3,755 2,869 78 31 47 2.588 3.188 2.183 1.498 73 46 27 1,125 1.346 743 594 89 25 64 Estimated Typical Shn.rt4 Obsex'~ed Zoning P~g A~ ~e ~ P~ P~ R~u~ent Accumuhfion Accum~fion (spac~} (spaces) (spaces) ~For thLs caiculndon. the following code standarch were used: Office = 4.0 spices per 1,000 square feet of GL~.: retail = 4.0 or 5.0 spaces per 1.000 feet of GL~. (funorton of size}: restaurant = '2_0.0 spaces per 1.000 square feet of G L-k: residential = 1.0 spaces per dwelling unit: hegel = 1.0 spaces per room. w~ith conference rooms at 0.5 spaces per seat. ~Using resulu from Column 3. Recommended Shared Parking Method Based upou st,:'vev findings. a metboth)long?' was ([eveh~ped t. determine parking demand um[er nHxetJ-ttse deve[,pment c'nnditim~s. This ~gy is universal in its application and tlexible emmgh u~ incm'p~rate adjustment fatira's as necessary to suit specific policies. prognm~s. anti market concli~ions. h inx'~fives ti~ur basic steps that may be applied. with appropriate backgr.und infi~rmation. t. an existing ~r prop,sed project. Figure 7 illustrates the m'gani- zati.n and tl.w of w.rk. '['he four basic steps are: Step 1: l,iti, l Pt,it.or Rt.vit.w~inv.lves the sizing and t'uncti,nal relati~mship ,t' pr~4ect land uses up~m market research. site c~mslrltints. etc. Step 2: l&rtk Prt*ki.g b51rl.r .tdl...t.tr.t~inv, fives the >electi(,n -f aplm~pfiate peak l~m'king accumtdati, m tact,ifs tin' each land use. and the adjustment ()t' each ['act,r u) reflect site-s~cific facu~rs such a.i transit t,~c and captive markets. h,,urtx. dailx .' and ~ca~,,~al e.cim;,ti,,,, ,~l l)a,'kin~ t t~mtJlitti~m t'c,r ~;tth c~)[11pc)netll land use. Step 4: 511rlrrd ~tltk~ug E.ttm.tt,,.~inx~dxe~ the '['he tl~ethc,([ c;tn U~C t';tctt~r~ ;ttl(I rel:~ti,mshil)s .es. I'he latterc~mld include data u)m~cli[v parking [act-rs ()r ()ther chm-actcri>tic'5 and market .malxses. The meth,~d is (lc~igncd t~ be ~cqucnti:tl. hut it can be used in an itcratixc t';tshi~),l t,) test the impact ()t' altcrnatixc dex el,,pmcnt. plau~. [,,ll~. ,it p~,iicte=. Figure 7 Shared Parking Method Implementing Shared Parking A number of' factors must be c(msi¢lered in order to insure efficient design. operatiou. aud inanage- merit of shared parking Licilities. The research also examined these fact.rs in detail and ide,:tified guidelines tbr implementing shared parking as lows: · Each parking space should be usable by all parkers. i.e.. no restricti,ns. · The facility will have significant inbound and out- bound trM'fic tlow at one or more periods of the day. Theretbre. the design -f the access anti cir- cuiation system must ;.:cconlnlodate bi-directionltl movement without signitic:,nt cmdlict. AIs,. the circulation concept should be easy to use and un- derstand in order to ~ninimize cm~fusi,n and inet'- fitlent driving maneuvers. · The facility would tend t. operate 24 hot, rs. seven days per Week. Thus. safe clay and uight open:tion would be a significant char:~cteristic. · Because ,f the muhiple Iiu'~(l uses that xv()uld be sen'ed. inw)lving a x'arietx ,d' types ~)t' parkers le.g.. business. daiix versus i,~/'requcnt. sh, q~pers. visi- tors. recreati~mal. etc. I. the facilitx xxill be nmre sensitive to ef[ectixe signing. marklugs. and other communication s,. stems. · Thought needs to be given [() ent',)rcement parking for on-site visits. since the t'acilitv will bc more sensitive to encroachment li.e.. less tvpic:,llv vacant spaceJ. · A strategy' for the use of the facility needs to be cte- veloped in order to guide parkers to the mo~t timurn space. The strategy would c~msitler: a. Achieving max:mum separ:tti, m ,,f parkers who tend to c,m,pe~e ti,r space. i.e.. being present at the same time te.g.. sh.ppcrs and cinema patrons attending matineesx b. Achieving minimum x,'alking distance to th,,se land u~es having captixe market relationships. c. Achieving minimum separation ,,t' those parkers not competing for space. · The data collected in the survey was sufficientIx consistent to indicate that a quantitative basis t'~r estimating shared parkin,.., demand does exist. Since the shared parking ,neth.dology estimates potential parking requirements h,,' specific mixed- use or multiuse developments. it can be used as evidence for a zoning procedure and as a de~elc~p- ment design tool. Use iu zoning procedures is si,g- nificant because of the parking standards currentIx' used in most urban areas. In many cases. the shared parking analvsis ~ill indic:{te lo~ver parkxng requirements. · _TI74"~Tj.~_ ~TfiTF7} LSeptember 83 7 APPENDIX B SHARED PARKING COMPUTER OUTPUT PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = ' 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR = JANUARY DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING RATES USED = City of Rancho Cucamonga 5/5/97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: TIME OF THE DAY PEAK PARKING MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR ADJ. PEAK PARKING HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 MID TIME OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 MID IMAXIMUM PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE 215 162 96 40 22 65% 80% 100% 100% 100% 140 130 96 40 22 0% 0% 36% 1% 3% 8% 2% 46% 4% 20% 18% 5% 39% 8% 63% 42% 10% 37% 11% 93% 68% 20% 24% 26% 100% 87% 30% 26% 53% 100% 97% 50% 39% 75% 90% 100% 70% 33% 94% 90% 97% 60% 17% 57% 97% 95% 60",(, 15% 48% 93% 87% 50% 34% 61% 77% 79% 70% 68% 90% 47% 82% 90% 100% 100% 23% 89% 100% 100% 82% 20% 87% 100% 81",4, 62% 7% 61% 100% 35% 39% 3% 32% 90% 8% 20% 3% 13% 70% 0% 15% 0% 0% 50% 0% 11% 0% 535 PARKING DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES IREST' HEALTH ENTER' I RETAIL AURANT CLUB TA NMENT OFFICE TOTAL 0 0 35 0 1 36 11 3 44 2 4 64 25 7 37 3 14 86 59 13 36 4 20 132 95 26 23 10 22 176 122 39 25 21 22 229 136 65 37 30 20 288 140 91 32 38 20 321 136 78 16 23 21 274 133 78 14 19 20 264 122 65 33 24 17 261 111 91 65 36 10 313 115 117 96 40 5 373 125 130 96 33 4 388 ** 122 130 78 25 2 357 85 130 34 16 1 266 45 117 8 8 1 179 18 91 0 6 0 115 0 65 0 4 0 69 PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR = FEBRUARY DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING RATES USED = City of Rancho Cucamonga 5/5/97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE PEAK PARKING 215 162 96 40 22 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 65°(, 75% 100% 100% 100% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 140 1 22 96 40 22 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 0% 0% 36% 1% 3% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 46% 4% 20% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 39% 8% 63% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 37% 11% 93% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 24% 26°(, 100% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 26% 53% 100% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 39% 75% 90% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 33% 94% 90% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 17% 57% 97% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 15% 48% 93% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 34% 61% 77% 5:00 PM 79°(,(, 70% 68% 90% 47% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 100% 100% 23% 7:00 PM 89°(, 100% 100% 82% 20% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 81% 62% 7% 9:00 PM 61% 100% 35% 39% 3% 10:00 PM 32°(, 90% 8% 20% 3% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 0% 15% 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50°(, 0% 11% 0% PARKING DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL 6:00 AM 0 7:00 AM 11 8:00 AM 25 9:00 AM 59 10:00 AM 95 11:00 AM 122 12:00 NOON 136 1:00 PM 140 2:00 PM 136 3:00 PM 133 4:00 PM 122 5:00 PM 111 6:00 PM 115 7:00 PM 125 8:00 PM 122 9:00 PM 85 10:00 PM 45 11:00 PM 18 12:00 MID 0 IMAXIMUM IREST-I HEALTH AURANT CLUB 0 35 2 44 6 37 12 36 24 23 37 25 61 37 85 32 73 16 73 14 61 33 85 65 110 96 122 96 122 78 122 34 110 8 85 0 61 0 ENTER- TAINMENT I OFFICE 0 1 2 4 3 14 4 20 10 22 21 22 30 20 38 20 23 21 19 20 24 17 36 10 40 5 33 4 25 2 16 1 8 1 6 0 4 0 535 TOTAL 36 63 85 131 174 227 284 315 269 259 257 307 366 380 ** 349 258 172 109 65 38O PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR =MARCH DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING RATES USED: City of Rancho Cucamonga 5/5/97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: TIME OF THE DAY PEAK PARKING MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR ADJ. PEAK PARKING HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 MID TIME OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 MID IMAXIMUM RETAIL 215 70% 151 PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE 162 96 40 22 90% 100% 100% 100% 146 96 40 22 0% 0% 36% 1% 3% 8% 2% 46% 4% 20% 18% 5% 39% 8% 63% 42% 10% 37% 11% 93% 68% 20% 24% 26% 100% 87% 30% 26% 53% 100% 97% 50% 39% 75% 90% 100% 70% 33% 94% 90% 97% 60% 17% 57% 97% 95% 60% 15% 48% 93% 87% 50% 34% 61% 77% 79% 70% 68% 90% 47% 82% 90% 100% 100% 23% 89% 100% 100% 82% 20% 87% 100% 81% 62% 7% 61% 100% 35% 39% 3% 32% 90% 8% 20% 3% 13% 70% 0% 15% 0% 0% 50% 0% 11% 0% PARKING DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE 0 0 35 0 1 12 3 44 2 4 27 7 37 3 14 63 15 36 4 20 103 29 23 10 22 131 44 25 21 22 146 73 37 30 20 151 102 32 38 20 146 88 16 23 21 143 88 14 19 20 131 73 33 24 17 119 102 65 36 10 124 131 96 40 5 134 146 96 33 4 131 146 78 25 2 92 146 34 16 1 48 131 8 8 1 20 102 0 6 0 0 73 0 4 0 535 TOTAL 36 65 88 138 187 243 306 343 294 284 278 332 396 413 382 289 196 128 77 413 PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR = APRIL DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING RATES USED = City of Rancho Cucamonga 5/5/97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE PEAK PARKING 215 162 96 40 22 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 7004, 9004, 100°,6 10004, 10004, ADJ. PEAK PARKING 151 146 96 40 22 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 0% 0% 36% 1 °4, 3% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 46% 4% 20% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 39% 8% 63% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 37% 11% 93% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 24% 26% 100% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 26% 53% 100% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 39% 75% 90% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 33% 94% 90% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 17% 57% 97% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 15% 48% 93% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 34% 61% 77% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 68% 90% 47% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 100% 100% 23% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 82% 20% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 81% 62% 7% 9:00 PM 61% 100% 35% 39% 3% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 8% 20% 3% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 0% 15% 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 0% 11% 0% TIME OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 MID IMAXIMUM ,, PARKING DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES I REST' I HEALTH RETAIL AURANT CLUB 0 0 35 12 3 44 27 7 37 63 15 36 103 29 23 131 44 25 146 73 37 151 102 32 146 88 16 143 88 14 131 73 33 119 102 65 124 131 96 134 146 96 131 146 78 92 146 34 48 131 8 20 102 0 0 73 0 535 ENTER- I TAINMENT OFFICE TOTAL 0 1 36 2 4 65 3 14 88 4 20 138 10 22 187 21 22 243 30 20 306 38 20 343 23 21 294 19 20 284 24 17 278 36 10 332 40 5 396 33 4 413 ** 25 2 382 16 1 289 8 1 196 6 0 128 4 0 77 413 PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR = MAY DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING RATES USED = City of Rancho Cucamonga 5/5/97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL PEAK PARKING 215 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 70% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 151 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 0% 7:00 AM 8% 8:00 AM 18% 9:00 AM 42% 10:00 AM 68% 11:00 AM 87% 12:00 NOON 97% 1:00 PM 100% 2:00 PM 97% 3:00 PM 95% 4:00 PM 87% 5:00 PM 79% 6:00 PM 82% 7:00 PM 89% 8:00 PM 87% 9:00 PM 61% 10:00 PM 32% 11:00 PM 13% 12:00 MID 0% PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE 162 96 40 22 95*/0 100% 100% 100% 154 96 40 22 0% 36% 1% 3% 2% 46% 4% 20% 5% 39% 8% 63% 10% 37% 11% 93% 20% 24% 26% 100% 30% 26% 53% 100% 50% 39% 75% 90% 70% 33% 94% 90% 60% 17% 57% 97% 60% 15% 48% 93% 50% 34% 61% 77% 70% 68% 90% 47% 90% 100% 100% 23% 00% 100% 82% 20% 00% 81% 62% 7% 00% 35% 39% 3% 90% 8% 20% 3% 70% 0% 15% 0% 50% 0% 11% 0% PARKING DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES I REST- I HEALTH ENTER-I TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT 6:00 AM 0 0 35 0 7:00 AM 12 3 44 2 8:00 AM 27 8 37 3 9:00 AM 63 15 36 4 10:00 AM 103 31 23 10 11:00 AM 131 46 25 21 12:00 NOON 146 77 37 30 1:00 PM 151 108 32 38 2:00 PM 146 92 16 23 3:00 PM 143 92 14 19 4:00 PM 131 77 33 24 5:00 PM 119 108 65 36 6:00 PM 124 139 96 40 7:00 PM 134 154 96 33 8:00 PM 131 154 78 25 9:00 PM 92 154 34 16 10:00 PM 48 139 8 8 11:00 PM 20 108 0 6 12:00 MID 0 77 0 4 IMAXIMUM OFFICE 1 4 14 20 22 22 20 20 21 20 17 10 5 4 2 1 1 0 0 535 TOTAL 36 65 89 138 189 245 310 349 298 288 282 338 404 421 390 297 204 134 81 421 PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR =JUNE DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING RATES USED: City of Rancho Cucamonga 5~5~97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE PEAK PARKING 215 162 96 40 22 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 161 162 96 40 22 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 0% 0% 36% 1% 3% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 46% 4% 20% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 39% 8% 63% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 37% 11% 93% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 24% 26% 100% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 26% 53% 100% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 39% 75% 90% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 33% 94% 90% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 17% 57% 97% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 15% 48% 93% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 34% 61% 77% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 68% 90% 47% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 100% 100% 23% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 82% 20% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 81% 62% 7% 9:00 PM 61% 100% 35% 39% 3% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 8% 20% 3% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 0% 15% 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 0% 11% 0% TIME OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 MID IMAXIMUM · , .. PARKING DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES IREST' I HEALTH ENTER- I RETAIL AURANTI CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE 0 0 35 0 1 13 3 44 2 4 29 8 37 3 14 68 16 36 4 20 109 32 23 10 22 140 49 25 21 22 156 81 37 30 20 161 113 32 38 20 156 97 16 23 21 153 97 14 19 20 140 81 33 24 17 127 113 65 36 10 132 146 96 40 5 143 162 96 33 4 140 162 78 25 2 98 162 34 16 1 52 146 8 8 1 21 113 0 6 0 0 81 0 4 0 535 TOTAL 36 66 91 144 196 257 324 364 313 303 295 351 419 438 ** 407 311 215 140 85 438 PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR =JULY DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING PATES USED '- City of Rancho Cucamonga 5/5/97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL AUPANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE PEAK PARKING 215 162 96 40 22 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 100% 100% 100% 100% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 161 162 96 40 22 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 0% 0% 36% 1% 3% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 46% 4% 20% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 39% 8% 63% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 37% 11% 93% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 24% 26% 100% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 26% 53% 100% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 39% 75% 90% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 33% 94% 90% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 17% 57% 97% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 15% 48% 93% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 34% 61% 77% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 68% 90% 47% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 100% 100% 23% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 82% 20% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 81% 62% 7% 9:00 PM 61% 100% 35% 39% 3% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 8% 20% 3% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 0% 15% 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 0% 11% 0% TIME OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 MID IMAXIMUM PARKING DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES I REST' IHEALTH RETAIL AURANT CLUB ENTER- TAINMENTI OFFICE 0 0 35 0 1 13 3 44 2 4 29 8 37 3 14 68 16 36 4 20 109 32 23 10 22 140 49 25 21 22 156 81 37 30 20 161 113 32 38 20 156 97 16 23 21 153 97 14 19 20 140 81 33 24 17 127 113 65 36 10 132 146 96 40 5 143 162 96 33 4 140 162 78 25 2 98 162 34 16 1 52 146 8 8 1 21 113 0 6 0 0 81 0 4 0 535 TOTAL 36 66 91 144 196 257 324 364 313 303 295 351 419 438 407 311 215 140 85 438 PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR = AUGUST DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING RATES USED = City of Rancho Cucamonga 5~5~97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE PEAK PARKING 215 162 96 40 22 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% 85% 100% 100% 100% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 161 138 96 40 22 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 0% 0% 36% 1% 3% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 46% 4% 20% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 39% 8% 63% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 37% 11% 93% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 24% 26% 100% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 26% 53% 100% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 39% 75% 90% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 33% 94% 90% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 17% 57% 97% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 15% 48% 93% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 34% 61% 77% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 68% 90% 47% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 100% 100% 23% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 82% 20% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 81% 62% 7% 9:00 PM 61% 100% 35% 39% 3% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 8% 20% 3% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 0% 15% 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 0% 11% 0% TIME OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 MID IMAXIMUM PARKING DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES I REST- HEALTHI ENTER-I RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE 0 0 35 0 1 13 3 44 2 4 29 7 37 3 14 68 14 36 4 20 109 28 23 10 22 140 41 25 21 22 156 69 37 30 20 161 97 32 38 20 156 83 16 23 21 153 83 14 19 20 140 69 33 24 17 127 97 65 36 10 132 124 96 40 5 143 138 96 33 4 140 138 78 25 2 98 138 34 16 1 52 124 8 8 1 21 97 0 6 0 0 69 0 4 0 535 TOTAL 36 66 90 142 192 249 312 348 299 289 283 335 397 414 ** 383 287 193 124 73 414 PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR = SEPTEMBER DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING RATES USED = City of Rancho Cucamonga 5/5/97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE PEAK PARKING 215 162 96 40 22 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75o/0 80% 100% 100% 100% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 161 130 96 40 22 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 0% 0% 36°/0 10/0 3% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 46% 4% 20% 8:00 AM 18% 5°/0 39% 8°/0 63% 9:00 AM 42% 10°/0 37% 11% 93% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 24% 26% 100% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 26% 53% 100% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 39% 75% 90% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 33°/0 94% 90% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 17% 57% 97% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 15°/0 48% 93% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 34% 61% 77% 5:00 PM 79% 70°/0 68% 90% 47% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 100% 100% 23% 7:00 PM 89°/0 100% 100% 82% 20% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 81% 62% 7% 9:00 PM 61% 100% 35% 39% 3% 10:00 PM 32°/0 90°/0 8% 20% 3% 11:00 PM 13°/0 70°/0 0% 15% 0% 12:00 MID 0°/0 50°/0 0% 11% 0% PARKING DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES II REST- I HEALTH TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL AURANT CLUB 6:00 AM 0 0 35 7:00 AM 13 3 44 8:00 AM 29 7 37 9:00 AM 68 13 36 10:00 AM 109 26 23 11:00 AM 140 39 25 12:00 NOON 156 65 37 1:00 PM 161 91 32 2:00 PM 156 78 16 3:00 PM 153 78 14 4:00 PM 140 65 33 5:00 PM 127 91 65 6:00 PM 132 117 96 7:00 PM 143 130 96 8:00 PM 140 130 78 9:00 PM 98 130 34 10:00 PM 52 117 8 11:00 PM 21 91 0 12:00 MID 0 65 0 IMAXIMUM ENTER- TAINMENT OFFICE 0 1 2 4 3 14 4 20 10 22 21 22 30 20 38 20 23 21 19 20 24 17 36 10 40 5 33 4 25 2 16 1 8 1 6 0 4 0 535 TOTAL 36 66 90 141 190 247 308 342 294 284 279 329 390 406 ** 375 279 186 118 69 4O6 PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR = OCTOBER DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING RATES USED = City of Rancho Cucamonga 5/5/97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL PEAK PARKING 215 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 75% ADJ, PEAK PARKING 161 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 0% 0% 7:00 AM 8% 8:00 AM 18'`4 9:00 AM 42% 10% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 12:00 NOON 97% 50',4, 1:00 PM 100% 70'`4 2:00 PM 97*`4 60*`4 3:00 PM 95*`4 60% 4:00 PM 87',4, 50% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 8:00 PM 87% 100'`4 9:00 PM 61% 100',4 10:00 PM 32% 90% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 12:00 MID 0% 50% TIME OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 MID IMAXIMUM PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE 162 96 40 22 80% 100°`4 100*`4 100*`4 130 96 40 22 36'`4 1% 3% 46'`4 4% 20% 39% 8*`4 63*`4 37% 11% 93% 24% 26% 100% 26% 53% 100% 39% 75% 90% 33'`4 94% 90% 17% 57% 97% 15*`4 48% 93% 34'`4 61 '`4 77% 68°`4 90°`4 47°`4 00*`4 100°`4 23*`4 00°`4 82°`4 20°`4 810`4 62*`4 7*`4 35°`4 39% 3°`4 8% 20% 3% 0% 15% 0% 0% 11% 0% PARKING DEMAND:NUMBER OF SPACES REST-I HEALTHI ENTER-I RETAIL AURANTI CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE 0 0 35 0 1 13 3 44 2 4 29 7 37 3 14 68 13 36 4 20 109 26 23 10 22 140 39 25 21 22 156 65 37 30 20 161 91 32 38 20 156 78 16 23 21 153 78 14 19 20 140 65 33 24 17 127 91 65 36 10 132 117 96 40 5 143 130 96 33 4 140 130 78 25 2 98 130 34 16 1 52 117 8 8 1 21 91 0 6 0 0 65 0 4 0 535 TOTAL 36 66 90 141 190 247 308 342 294 284 279 329 390 406 ** 375 279 186 118 69 406 PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR = NOVEMBER DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING RATES USED -- City of Rancho Cucamonga 5/5/97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE PEAK PARKING 215 162 96 40 22 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 80% 80% 90% 100% 100% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 172 130 86 40 22 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 0% 0% 36% 1% 3% 7:00 AM 8% 2% 46% 4% 20% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 39% 8% 63% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 37% 11% 93% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 24% 26% 100% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 26% 53% 100% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 39% 75% 90% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 33% 94% 90% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 17% 57% 97% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 15% 48% 93% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 34% 61% 77% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 68% 90% 47% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 100% 100% 23% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 82% 20% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 81% 62% 7% 9:00 PM 61% 100% 35% 39% 3% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 8% 20% 3% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 0% 15% 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 0% 11% 0% TIME OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 MID IMAXIMUM " PARKING DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES REST- HEALTH RETAIL AURANT CLUB 0 0 31 14 3 40 31 7 34 72 13 32 117 26 21 7150 39 22 T167 65 34 I~72 91 28 ~167 78 15 -163 78 13 150 65 29 136 91 58 141 117 86 153 130 86 150 130 70 105 130 30 55 117 7 22 91 0 0 65 0 535 ENTER- I TOTAL TAINMENTI OFFICE 0 1 32 2 4 63 3 14 89 4 20 141 10 22 196 21 22 254 30 20 316 38 20 349 23 21 304 19 20 293 24 17 285 36 10 331 40 5 389 33 4 406 ** 25 2 377 16 1 282 8 I 188 6 0 119 4 0 69 406 PROJECT NAME = THOMAS WINERY PLAZA PROJECT NUMBER = 920-97-001 MONTH OF THE YEAR = DECEMBER DAY OF THE WEEK = WEEKDAY PARKING RATES USED = City of Rancho Cucamonga 5/5/97 ANALYST: CAB COMMENTS: PARKING DISTRIBUTION REST- HEALTH ENTER- TIME OF THE DAY RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE PEAK PARKING 215 162 96 40 22 MONTHLY ADJ FACTOR 100% 90% 80% 100% 100% ADJ. PEAK PARKING 215 146 77 40 22 HOUR OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 0% 0% 36% 1% 3% 7:00 AM 8~, 2% 46% 4% 20% 8:00 AM 18% 5% 39% 8% 63% 9:00 AM 42% 10% 37% 11% 93% 10:00 AM 68% 20% 24% 26% 100% 11:00 AM 87% 30% 26% 53% 100% 12:00 NOON 97% 50% 39% 75% 90% 1:00 PM 100% 70% 33% 94% 90% 2:00 PM 97% 60% 17% 57% 97% 3:00 PM 95% 60% 15% 48% 93% 4:00 PM 87% 50% 34% 61% 77% 5:00 PM 79% 70% 68% 90% 47% 6:00 PM 82% 90% 100% 100% 23% 7:00 PM 89% 100% 100% 82% 20% 8:00 PM 87% 100% 81% 62% 7% 9:00 PM 61% 100% 35% 39% 3% 10:00 PM 32% 90% 8% 20% 3% 11:00 PM 13% 70% 0% 15% 0% 12:00 MID 0% 50% 0% 11% 0% TIME OF THE DAY 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 MID IMAXIMUM ., PARKING DEMAND: NUMBER OF SPACES 535 IREST- HEALTH ENTER- I RETAIL AURANT CLUB TAINMENT OFFICE TOTAL 0 0 28 0 1 29 17 3 35 2 4 61 39 7 30 3 14 93 90 15 28 4 20 157 146 29 18 10 22 225 187 44 20 21 22 294 209 73 30 30 20 362 215 102 25 38 20 400 209 88 13 23 21 354 204 88 12 19 20 343 187 73 26 24 17 327 170 102 52 36 10 370 176 131 77 40 5 429 191 146 77 33 4 451 187 146 62 25 2 422 131 146 27 16 1 321 69 131 6 8 1 215 28 102 0 6 0 136 0 73 0 4 0 77 451 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-38, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A BAR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT THAT OFFERS ENTERTAINMENT WITHIN THE THOMAS WINERY PLAZA, IN THE SPECIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 2, OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-101-23. A. Recitals. 1. Ron Bozarth has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 97-38, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of December 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 10, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue which is improved with a commercial center. b. The property to the north is developed with a commercial center and is part of the Thomas Winery Plaza, the properties to the south are developed with a gas station, liquor store, and fast food restaurant, the property to the east is developed with a commercial center, and the property to the west is vacant but approved for a commercial center. c. The proposed use, a bar for the serving of alcoholic drinks in conjunction with a restaurant, is consistent with the Special Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. d. The commercial center has sufficient parking spaces to accommodate the proposed use based on a Parking Study prepared by a traffic engineer consultant. e. The proposed use would be compatible with the surrounding uses. referenced above, this Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 Commission hereby finds and concludes as. fj~llows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-38- DESPERADO'S December10,1997 Page 2 a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Division 1) Approval is for a 5,300 square foot bar and restaurant with entertainment (EP 97-04). Expansion or intensification of the bar facility shall require a modification to the Conditional Use Permit. 2) Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or the approved use has not commenced within 24 months of this date. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) If operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon adjacent businesses or operations, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible termination of the use. 5) The facility shall be operated in conformance with the performance standards as defined in the Development Code including, but not limited to noise levels. 6) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be designed in conformance with the City Sign's Ordinance and the Uniform Sign program for the Thomas Winery Plaza and shall require review and approval by the City Planner prior to installation. 7) The hours of operation for the bar shall be from 4 p.m. until 2 a.m., Tuesday through Saturday and 3 p.m. until 2 a.m. on Sunday. 8) A separate Conditional Use Permit is required if there are more than three coin-operated amusement devices on the premises. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-38 - DESPERADO'S December 10, 1997 Page 3 9) Any historic artifacts such as the conveyor belt and the stairs shall be maintained in place and kept in good condition. lO) The food and drinks menu shall include a short history of the Thomas Winery. The written history shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to publication. 11) Private parties with or without bar service and entertainment may be allowed during the day and must end before the regular bar and entertainment begins. Building and Fire Safety Division 1) Occupancy of the facility shall not commerce until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal's regulations have been complied with. Detailed plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District and the Building and Safety Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 2) Any modification to the approved plans after occupancy of the building may require additional review and/or permits from the Fire District and the Building and Safety Division. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of December 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 97-04, A REQUEST TO OFFER ENTERTAINMENT CONSISTING OF DANCING, DISC JOCKEYS, CONCERTS, AND LIVE BANDS IN CONJUNCTION WITH A BAR AND RESTAURANT WITHIN THE THOMAS WINERY PLAZA, IN THE SPECIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, SUBAREA 2 OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 8916 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-101-23. A. Recitals. 1. On May 21, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2. Ron Bozarth has filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit No. 97-04 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 3. On the 10th day of December 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 10, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue which is improved with a commercial center. b. The property to the north is developed with a commercial center and is part of the Thomas Winery Plaza, the property to the south is developed with a gas station, a liquor store and a fast food restaurant, the property to the east is developed with a commercial center, and the property to the west is vacant but approved with a commercial center. c. The proposed uses consist of full bar service, limited food service and entertainment. d. The proposed uses are consistent with the Special Commercial District of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 97-04 - DESPERADOS December 10, 1997 Page 2 e. The proposed entertainment would not conflict with other approved entertainment uses within the Thomas Winery Plaza. f. The commercial center has sufficient parking spaces to accommodate the proposed uses based on a Parking Study prepared by a traffic engineer consultant. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare; and b. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner; and c. That the applicant, or any person associated with him as principal or partner or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of any kind or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude or has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provisions of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years; and d. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and e. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding commercial center and adjacent apartment complex; and f. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planning Division 1) This approval is only for the following entertainment uses: dancing, dance lessons with dance instructors, disc jockeys, and live bands. Any change of intensity or type of entedainment shall require a modification to this permit. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 97-04 - DESPERADOS December 10, 1997 Page 3 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) 12) The days and hours of operation for the entertainment shall be limited to 4 p.m. until 2 a.m., Tuesday through Saturday and 3 p.m. to 2 a.m. on Sunday. Any expansion of days and/or hours shall require modification to this permit. No adult entertainment, as defined in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.04.090, shall be permitted. Entertainment shall be conducted inside the building. When entertainment is being conducted, doors and windows shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. Exterior noise levels shall not exceed 65 dB between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. and 60 dB between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Access to the lounge/entertainment area must be from the main entrance to the pdma~ use and not from a separate exterior entrance. Other exits shall be for "Fire Exit Only." If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to noise, !oitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. This permit shall be renewed annually by the applicant per Municipal Code Section 5.12.115. A minimum of one duly licensed, certified, or trained and regularly employed secudty guard from a reputable secudty firm shall be required to be inside the premises and one outside in the parking lot area (for a total of two security personnel), from 4 p.m. until the closing of entertainment. The security person in the parking lot shall remain on duty in the parking area and outside adjacent areas of the facility to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons or anyone in the parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbances. All security personnel shall wear distinctive shirts with "security" prominently displayed on the front and back. Concerts will require the submittal of a special security and safety plan for City Planner's review and approval one month prior to the scheduled event. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 97-04 - DESPERADOS December 10, 1997 Page 4 13) The entertainment shall be limited to patrons age 21 and over. 14) The Planning Commission shall conduct a compliance review six months from the date of commencement of the entertainment use. 15) The applicant shall submit a monthly entertainment schedule for City Planner review for compliance with approved entertainment. 16) Pdvate padies with or without entertainment may be allowed during the day and must end before the regular entertainment begins. Private parties are not open to the public and an admission fee cannot be charged. Fire District/Building & Safety Division 1) Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal's regulations have been complied with. Detailed plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District and the Building and Safety Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 2) Any modifications to the approved plans after occupancy of the building may require additional review and/or permits from the Fire District and the Building and Safety Division. 3) The maximum number of occupants shall not exceed Building and Fire Codes. The maximum occupancy for each room shall be posted as determined by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and/or the City's Fire Prevention Unit Division. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 97-04 - DESPERADOS December 10, 1997 Page 5 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the loth day of December 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 12, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Miki Bratt, AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-27 - NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. -A request to construct a cellular transmitter facility which is not staffed, including a 60 foot monopole and a 120 foot equipment shelter within a 1,600-square foot leased area located on a 55.86 acre parcel noah of Arrow Highway and west of Etiwanda Avenue in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan - APN: 229-032-24. Related File: Conditional Use Permit 97-38. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Noah - Vacant, Light Industrial; Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4) South - Developed with Manufacturing; Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 15) East Developed with Apartments; Medium Residential, Etiwanda Specific Plan West Developed with Manufacturing; Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 8) General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial Noah Industrial Park South Heavy Industrial East Medium Residential West General Industrial Site Characteristics: The 40-foot leased site is located within an approximately 56 acre site developed by Metropolitan Water District for power generation and water supply facilities. The site is screened on the noah and east be a combination of fences and landscaped berms. It is partially screened on the south by a landscaped berm along Arrow Highway. A chain link fence separates the Metropolitan Water District site from the adjoining manufacturing business. ITEM G ...... T'rlllr ................................... PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-27 - NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. December 10, 1997 Page 2 ANALYSIS: General: The subject application is for a 60 foot high monopole located on a lease site which is 415 feet north of Arrow Highway. The facility will be partially screened from public view from Arrow Highway by a combination of landscaped berm, block walls, solid metal gate, and additional landscaping. Computer generated photographs indicate that the proposed monopo!~.~ will be virtually invisible from Foothill Boulevard and from Etiwanda Avenue. The project ~s consistent with Ordinance No. 570 governing wireless communication facilities and with the requirements of the General Industrial District in which it is located. The proposed facility is one of three facilities within the City, which are existing or planned to complete the Nextel communications network. A facility exists in the General Industrial District at the rear of a business park, located generally north of 6th Street and east of Utica Avenue. In addition to the subject application, a third facility is planned. A condition of approval requires that any future application request will be in conformance with Ordinance No. 570. The property owner, Metropolitan Water District, has provided landscaped berm and parkway improvements along Arrow Highway as part of development of their 56 acres. However, because of faulty equipment, the landscaping along Arrow Highway is deteriorating or dead. The District, in a letter dated October 15, 1997, maintains that repairs have been made to the irrigation system and the landscaping will be restored or replaced (Exhibit "D"). Maintenance of the aforementioned landscaping will be required as a condition of approval of the subject application. Landscaping will also be provided by Nextel Communication's Inc. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee met on November 18, 1997. The Committee recommended approval of the project (Exhibit "E"). Technical Review Committee: As there were no new technical items for review, the Technical Review Committee scheduled for November 19, 1997, was canceled. However, all conditions and special conditions were discussed with the applicant and copies forwarded by mail. Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Assessment has been completed and determined that, with mitigation, there could be no significant impacts on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended (Exhibit "F"). Environmental Mitigation Measures: The following mitigation measures will reduce potential significant impacts to a level less than significant: The irrigated landscape berm which provides screening for Metropolitan Water District's facilities and also provides a portion of the required screening for the subject site shall be restored, prior to occupancy of the subject site and to the satisfaction of the City Planner, and shall be maintained in good condition by the underlying property owner, Metropolitan Water District. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-27 - NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. December 10, 1997 Page 3 Landscaping along the public right-of-way on the north side of Arrow Highway shall be restored, prior to occupancy of the subject site and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and shall be maintained in good condition by the underlying property owner, Metropolitan Water District. This facility and each and every subsequent application for a facility or facilities to provide service for the Nextel Communication's, Inc. cellular network shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 570, regulating cellular transmission facilities. FACTS FOR FINDING: Staff has determined that the subject project is: A. The project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The project is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. C. The project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the subject application with conditions. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:MB:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Location Map Site Plan Incorporating Landscape Plan Elevations Letter from Metropolitan Water District dated October 15, 1997 Design Review Committee Minutes dated November 18, 1997 Environmental Assessment Part I and II Resolution of Approval with Conditions 1750.02' .~.--~-(E) PROPERLY LINE /r(E) C.L. FENCE W/ BARBED WIRE E UItUH POLE w/ 1'O LEASE AREA ~~N) 7' W~DE ut~urY LASEMEN! ~I~.~i~JI~(N) 40'x40' NEXTEL ~~LEAS[ AREA, SEE 01/1 ~(N) ~' wJo~ ACCESS EASEMEN1 /-([) U11LI~ POLES ~ O.H. LINES /--- (e) RESERVOIR ARCEL 2 5.86- ACRES 1911.06' ARROW ROUTE 9 jl ANTENNA PLATFOR.~ ORIENTAIIONc..~) ARROW~__R. gUTE _9_ _ 1 J ~ITE PLAN :/ [@UIPU£NJ ARIMA PLAI',I VICINITY D.E. MILLER ARCHITECT CURRENT ISSUED DAIE ISSUED FOR APPROVALS SITE NUUBER CA5706E CITRUS $11[ ADDRESS SHEEl TITLE EOUIPIvtENT WEST EOUIPMEN! [!.EVATION SOUIH EOUIPMENT ELEVAIlON D.E. MILLER ARCHITECT CURRENT ISSUED DAlE ISSU[D FOR ~P~V~S SllE NUMBER CA5706E CITRUS SIll ADDRESS ;~:, .,,,,:..~;;, ,:;? ,,,. SHEEl lille EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS SHEEl NUUB[R IT1 ---t '-O WFST FOUIPM[NT [L~ATION SOUTH [OUIP~ENT ELEVATION D.E. MILLEl ARCHITECT CURRENT ISSUED DAlE ISSUED FOR APPROVALS SIIE NUUBER CA5700E CITRUS DT[ ADDRESS ~,;,",,', *%', t"j'; SH[[I TILL[ EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS SHEEl NUMBER MWD METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA C,\t¥ o~ 2a~ 0~ City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Attention: Ms.' "' ~ ' jvhK~ ~rad, AiCP Associate Planner Octoberl5, 1997 Nextel Site No. CA5706E - Citrus MWD Etiwanda Facility R./W Parcel No. 1607-7-31 Substructures Job No. 4662-97-001 Dear Ms. Bratt: Landscapine at Etiwanda Facilitv This is in response to your letter of August 14, 1997, to Nextel Communication, Inc. and your recent conversation with our Field Project Coordinator, Mr. Charles Poling of Riverside Branch regarding the dismal shape of Metropolitan's landscaping along Arrow Highway. (See paragraphs I-B-4 & II-A-I of your letter.) Our Landscaping Contractor reported to us on July 15, 1997, that one of our controllers was malfunctioning in the watering system along Arrow Highway. The required replacement parts needed to be procured, and on September 15, 1997, repairs were made which included the installation of a new circuit board in the control unit that operates the sprinklers. The landscaping, (which consists of the parkway and setback/slope) along Arrow Highway is starting to look green again. Metropolitan will replace the trees and plants that fail to recover. Metropolitan has provided the Fire Department access to our facility through the front gate located at 8248 Etiwanda Avenue. The Etiwanda Facility roads are being maintained and have been in good condition from the time access was first granted to the Fire Department. (See paragraphs III-1, la, 2, & 3 of your letter) Should you require any additional information, please contact Mr. Charles Poling at telephone (909) 780-1511, extension 2826. Very truly yours, Jill T. Gramith Operation & Maintenance Manager R/verside Branch David B. Snyder ~ Assistant Operation & Maintenance Manager CAP/cp cc: J.T. Gramith / D. B. Snyder D. T. Clewley / P. W. Fowler L. J. Barrett / S. M. Walters / R. S. Campbell J. R. Mirone B. B. Eaton C. A. Poling DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Miki Bratt November 18, 1997 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-27 - NEXTEL COMMUNICATION, INC. - A request to construct a cellular transmitter facility which is not staffed, including a 60 foot monopole and a 120 square foot equipment shelter within a 1,600-square foot leased area located on a 55.86 acre parcel north of Arrow Highway and east of Etiwanda Avenue in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan - APN: 229-032-24. Design Parameters: The facility will be located on a 40-foot by 40-foot leased site located 415 feet north of Arrow Highway and adjacent to the west property line of the Metropolitan Water District parcel. The Metropolitan Water District facility is screened by a landscaped berm which is in "dismal" condition. Driving west along Arrow, the facility will be substantially screened by the existing berm. Also, computer generated photographs indicate the pole will be virtually invisible from Foothill Boulevard and from Etiwanda Avenue. However, the lease site is visible from Arrow Highway through chain link fence along the west property line and along the gated access connecting the site to Arrow Highway. Staff Comments: The follo~ving comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: Adequate screening should be provided. An 8-foot high decorative block wall with decorative cap should be constructed along the south and west perimeter of the lease site to provide required screening. A decorative solid gate should be provided to continue the screen across the drive access. An irrigated landscape palette of shrubs and vines should be planted around the exterior of the block wall to soften the appearance of the wall with a minimum 4-foot planter width. (The north and east perimeters of the leased site are not visible from public view and may be secured by chain link fencing). The pole should be located as far as possible from Arrow Highway. Therefore, the pole should be located to the rear of the lease site and behind the facilities structure. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: A minimum of five fast growing columnar trees should be incorporated into the landscape plan (1 per 30 linear feet) in order to provide visual softening of the monopole. The pole should be painted to be compatible with surrounding structures. The applicant proposes galvanized metal however, either white or an aggregate finish would blend better with the surroundings, for example: the buildings to the west are painted white and light standards along Arrow Highway are concrete aggregate. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: Landscaping along the public right-of-way on the north side of Arrow Highway should be restored and maintained in good condition by the underlying propert), owner, Metropolitan Water District. DRC COMMENTS CUP 97-27 - NEXTEL COMMUNICATION, INC. November 1 g, 1997 Page 2 2. The irrigated landscape berm which provides screening for Metropolitan Water District's facilities and also provides a portion of the required screening for the subject site should be restored and maintained in good condition by the underlying property owner. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee approve the project subject to the modifications recommended above. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Bill Bethel, Rich Macias, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Miki Bratt The applicant agreed to the staff recommendations and the Design Review Committee recommended approval. City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division (909) 477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part ! -Initial Study) The'pUrpo~e:.Of this:form'is'to inform the City of the basic'components of the proposed proj~¢t:s~::~hat:th'~city::'may review th:e"project pursUant:'.io: City' policies, '~rdinances, and gu!de!ines;:th6caiif0rnia' En~,ironmental Quality Ac't~ 'and ~he' city's Rulesand Procedures to Im'plement'CEQA~':i!!lt is i'm~brtant that the information'requested in this applicat on be provided~in'full::::,:.;'.;:.i:i!::.i:::-i!-.:.:.::.:?:~:.: :-- .: :.-::-i - ' ::. .: ....'...' :" : ]' GENERAL INFORMATiON: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Appfication Number for the project to which this form pertains.' Name & Address of person prepan'ng this form (if different from above).' Telephone Number: PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by astedsk (') is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale (8-1t'2 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 3) Provide a set of color photographs which show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west,' views into and from the site from the pdmary access points which serve the site; and representative views of significan! features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. '5) Gross Site Area (aclsq. ft.).' xeo) · 5) Net Site Area (total site size mi. us area ofp.blic streets ,~ proposed dedications).' 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary: Include a description of all perTnits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project.' ,4/95 sate 2 9; 10 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, site all sources of infon'nation (i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): ~o) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Site all sources of information (books, pubfished reports and oral histoN): .----- Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses.' ~2) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use which will result from the prosed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) ff necessary: 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on p/ants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses. shops. department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): Vdll thCroposed pro/ect change the a~em scale or char~c~er of th¢ ' ' ' ~ ~/=~=~ ~ P , - s~oundmg g~neral area o~e prolect~ 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed? ~ ?) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water suppries) into which the site drains.' ~s) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact t,he Cucamonga County Water Oistdct at 987-2591. p.~,'-~,M [~k,~l' Ol~J O_,,t"t'-'t/ ~qk, J.~) ~)d'A'~j ME a Residential (gallday) Peak use (gab'Day) ~,~ Q ~ ,~ tkA~,rxJ~'~, b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use (gal/min/ac) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ~ Septic Tank h.I/~N Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed. attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage.~y~tem is proposed ir~dicate expected daily sewage generation.' (See A~achment A for usage estimates). For further clan'fication, please contact the Cucamonga County Water Distn'ct at 987-259 I. a. Residential (gallday) ~ ~ / b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) lk I/~,~ ! RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS.' 20) Number o/residential units.' Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, m~nimum lot size and maximum lot size.' Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units).· 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents·' Sate Price(s) 5 Rent (per month) 5 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: to 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within lhe project.' Districts as shown in A~achment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High ------- COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Contact the appropriate School Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses·' Total floor area.of commercial, i ,.strial, or institutional uses by type.' ~': - 4/9-3 Pa~e 5 cf :O 28) Number of employees: Total.' ~/~ Maximum Shift: Time d Maximum Shift: / //A 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication o! the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): I 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City.' '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quafity Management District, at (818) 572-5283): ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and descdbe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic rnatedals, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location'of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. '/ / hereby certify that the slatemerits furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project 1o the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further underrand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ' /" Tit,e: . ... PageSof'~O BACKGROUND 1. 2. 3. City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: CUP 97-27 Related Files: MWD - Eftwanda Generating Station Description of Project: A request to construct a cellular transmitter facility which is not staffed, including a 60-foot monopole and a 120 square foot equipment shelter within a 1,600 square foot leased area located on a 55.86 acre parcel north of Arrow Highway and west of Eftwanda Avenue in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan - APN: 229-031-24 Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Nextel Communications, Inc. 624 S. Grand Avenue, 9th Floor Los Angeles, California, 90017. Chris Glass (714) 862-2325 General Plan Designation: General Industrial Zoning: Industrial Area Specific Plan, Subarea 8 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: North: Light Industrial; Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan - Subarea 4; Vacant.. South: Heavy Industrial; Industrial Area Specific Plan - Subarea 15; Manufacturing. East: Medium Residential; Etiwanda Specific Plan; Developed; Residential. West: General Industrial; Industrial Area Specific Plan -- Subarea 8; Manufacturing. Developed, Developed, Initial Study for CUP 97-27 - Nextel City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 o 10. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Contact Person and Phone Number: Miki Bratt (909) 477-2750 Other agencies whose approval is required: Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( ) Land Use and Planning ( ) Population and Housing ( ) Geological Problems ( ) Water ( ) Air Quality ( ) Transportation/Circulation ( ) Biological Resources ( ) Energy and Mineral Resources ( ) Hazards ( ) Noise (X) Mandatory Findings of Significance ( ) Public Services ( ) Utilities and Service Systems (X) Aesthetics ( ) Cultural Resources ( ) Recreation DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (x) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project, or agreed to, by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Signed: M i~J~-B'ratt, AICP Associate Planner November 4, 1997 Initial Study for CUP 97-27 - Nextel City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Pursuant to Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, an explanation is required for all "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," and "Less Than Significant Impact" answers, including a discussion of ways to mitigate the significant effects identified. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Signif'~cant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigation SignifiC. antNo Impact Incor13otatedIml:,act Impact LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal.' a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: The project is consistent with the zoning for the district and surrounding development. Issues and Supporting Infon'nation Sources: POPULATION AND HOUSING. a) b) c) Potentially Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMrtigation Signify, antNo IreDact IncorDoratedImpact Impact Would the proposal.' Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? ( ) ( ) () (X) Comments' The proposed facility will not be staffed. Initial Study for CUP 97-27 - Nextel Issues and Supporting Information Sources: City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Potentially Signify. ant Impact Potentially Signif'mant Impact Less Unless Than M~getion Signifmant In¢o~x~lted Iml)act GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? ( ) ( ) b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) ( ) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ( ) ( ) d) Seiche hazards? ( ) ( ) e) Landslides or mudflows? ( ) ( ) f) Erosion, changes in topography, or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) ( ) g) Subsidence of the land? ( ) ( ) h) Expansive soils? ( ) ( ) i) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) ( ) Comments: The site is developed. Issues and Supporting Informabort Sources: WATER. Will the proposal result in: Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? a) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? b) Discharge into surface water or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen, or turbidity)? c) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? d) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? e) No Impact () (x) () (x) () (x) () (x) () (x) () () () () (x) (x) (x) (x) Potentially S~gnd'~ant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than S~gn~,c,a nlMd~gation Significant Impact IncorporatedImpact No Impact () () () (x) () () () (x) () () () (x) () () () (x) () () () (x) Initial Study for CUP 97-27 - Nextel City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: f) g) h) i) Potentially Signif-~ant Impact Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations, or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? ( ) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? ( ) Impacts to groundwater quality? ( ) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) Comments: No grading is proposed. Potentially Significant Impact Less Unless Than Mitigation Signif'~..ant IncorporatedIml:)act No Impact () () (x) () () (x) () () (x) () () (x) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: AIR QUALITY. a) b) c) d) PotenbaUy SignScant Impact Would the proposal: Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? ( ) Create objectionable odors? ( ) Comments: No emission will be produced. Potentially Significant Impact Unless M~tigation Inc~rDorated () () () () Less Then Signif'mant Impact () () () () No Impact (x) (x) (x) (x) Issues and Supporting Inforrrlatlon Sources: TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in.' a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? Potentially Significant Impact () Potentially S~gnificant Impact Unless Millgallon Incorporaled () Than Significant Impact () No Impact (x) Initial Study for CUP 97-27 - Nextel City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: b) c) d) e) f) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Signif',=ant Impact Lass Unless Than Mitigation Significant IncorporatedImpact Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ( ) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? ( ) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? ( ) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? ( ) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) ( ) g) Rail or air traffic impacts? ( ) ( ) No Impact () () (x) Comments: Increased access to communication services may reduce vehicle trips. ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) () () (x) (x) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to.' a) Endangered, threatened, or rare species or their habitats (including, but not limited to: plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees, eucalyptus windrow, etc.)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., eucalyptus grove, sage scrub habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian, and vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? Comments: The site is developed. Potentially SignScant Impact PotentiallyUnless SignificantM~tigation Impact Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact () ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) () ( ) () (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for CUP 97-27 - Nextel City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. proposal: a) b) c) Would the Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? ( ) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? ( ) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? ( ) Potentially Sign~ficent Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigation Signif*ma ntNo Impact IncorporatedImpact Impact ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: The site is developed. Increased access to cellular communications may reduce energy consumption through reduction of vehicle trips. o Issues and Supporting Information Sources: HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve.' a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? Potentially S~nificent Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than Sign~can[ Mrbgafion SignlficentNo Impact Incori~x)ratedImpact Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) () () () (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: c & d) The facility produces low level electromagnetic transmissions which are not known to be a health hazard. Initial Study for CUP 97-27 - Nextel City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 10. Issues and Suppo~ling Information Sources: NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? Potentially Signif'merit Impact Lass Potentially Unless Than Signirmant Mitigation Signifyant No Impact Incorporated Iml~act Impact () ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: An air conditioning unit for the facilities structure produces no more noise than a household air conditioner. 11. Issues and SuppoSing Information Sources: PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas.' Potentially S~gnif~ant Impact Lass Potentially Unless Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact In--rated Impact Impact a) Fire protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) c) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) e) Other governmental services? ( ) ( ) ( ) (X) Comments: The facility is not staffed, is located on a developed site, and therefore will not generate a need for new government services. 12. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or suppries or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) b) c) Power or natural gas? Communication systems? Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? Potentially S~gnificant Impact Less Polantially Unless Than Significant Mihgat~on Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Initial Study for CUP 97-27 - Nextel City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Potentially Significant Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyUnless Signific, antMitigation Impact Incorporaled d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) ( ) e) Storm water drainage? ( ) ( ) f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) ( ) g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) ( ) Lass Than SignificantNo Impact Impact ( ) (x) () (x) ( ) (x) ( ) (x) Comments: The 1,600 square foot leased space within the 53-acre developed site is not significant. 13. Issues and Suppoding Information Sources: AESTHETICS. Would the proposal.' a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? Potentially Significant Impact Less PotentiallyUnless Than SignificantMitigation Signif'~..antNo Impact IncorporatedImpact Impact ( ) () () (x) ( ) (x) ( ) () c) Create light or glare? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: b) A 60-foot high monopole with transmitters has the potential to negatively impact the visual environment. The lease site is located 415 feet north of Arrow Highway. It is partially screened by an existing irrigated and landscaped berm installed and maintained by the property owner, Metropolitan Water District. The 1,600 square-foot equipment shelter and the base of the 60-foot high monopole will also be screened by a combination of block wall, berm, and irrigated landscaping per the screening requirement of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Further, rapidly growing columnar trees will be provided which soften the vertical impact of the pole. The finish of the monopole will be compatible with surrounding industrial facilities. Required landscaping will be maintained in a satisfactory condition by the applicant and by the owner, respectively. These measures will mitigate aesthetic impacts to a less than significant level. 14. Issues and Supporting Information Sources: CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal.' a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? Potentially S~gnificanl Impact Less PotenballyUnless Than SignificantMitigation SignificantNo Impact IncorporatedImpact Impact ( ) () ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) () (x) Initial Study for CUP 97-27 - Nextel Issues end Supporting Information Sources: c) Affect historical or cultural resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? Comments: The site is developed. City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Potentially Signif re. ant Impact Potentlaity Signif'm_.ant Impact Less Unless Than Mitigation Significant Inc..or~r atedImpact No Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) 15. Issues and Supl:~ling Information Sources: RECREATION. Would the proposal.' a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? Comments: This facility is not staffed. Potentially Sign~cant IreDact Poi[ent~ally Significant Impact Less Unless Than Mitigation SignEdcant No IncorporatedImpact Impact ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) () () ( ) (x) 16. Issues and Supporting Infocmahon Sources: MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Potentially Signlfican~ Impact Potentially Signif'm. ant Impact Less Unless Than M~tigat~n Significant Incor]:~'ateclImpact No Impac~ () () () (x) Initial Study for CUP 97-27 - Nextel City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: b) c) Potentially Signif'~_.ant Impact Short term: Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) ( ) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) ( ) Potentially Significant Impac~ Less Unless Than Mitigation Signif,cant Incomorated Impact No Impact ( ) ( ) (x) (x) ( ) ( ) d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) Comments: c) With the construction of wireless communication facilities, there exists a potential for cumulative aesthetic degradation. The City's Wireless Communication Ordinance addresses the potential and discourages visible facilities in and adjacent to residential areas and sets a height limit of 35 feet outside the industrial zone. The proposed facility is part of a planned telecommunications grid. The applicant, Nextel, plans a total of three facilities within the City through 1998. They have identified the subject facility, an existing facility at 10700 Jersey Boulevard, and one additional facility. The applicant shall abide by Ordinance 570, therefore the potential for cumulative aesthetic degradation is reduced to a level of less than significant. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant .to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): Initial Study for CUP 97-27 - Nextel City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 (./) General Plan EIR (Certified April 6, 1981) (./) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (.,,,) Environmental Assessment for Metropolitan Water District Facility - Supplemental Final EIR No. 956, Enlargement of the East Branch of the Governor Edmund G. Brown California Aqueduct -- State Clearinghouse No. 83062409 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would Occur. Signature: Print Name and Title: City of Rancho Cucamonga NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: CUP 97-27 Public Review Period Closes: December 10, 1997 Project Name: Project Applicant: Nextel Communications, Inc. Project Location (also see attached map): Located on a 55.86 acre parcel north of Arrow Highway and west of Eftwanda Avenue - APN: 229-032-24. Project Description: A request to construct a cellular transmitter facility which is not staffed, including a 60 foot monopole and a 120 square foot equipment shelter within a 1,600-square foot leased area in the General Industrial District (Subarea 8) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Related file: Conditional Use Permit 97-38. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study shows that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. [] The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Negative Declaralion was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. Reasons to support this finding are included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Negative Declaration during the review period. December 10, 1997 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-27 FOR CELLULAR TRANSMITTER FACILITY LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN (SUBAREA 8), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 229-032-24. A. Recitals. 1. Nextel Communications, Inc. has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 97-27, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of December 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 10, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 60 foot high monopole and a 120 square foot equipment shelter on a 1,600 square foot lease area within a 55.86 developed site located at 8250 Eftwanda Avenue with a street frontage along Etiwanda Avenue of 1,149.77 feet and a street frontage along Arrow Highway of 1,911.06 feet and is presently improved with a power generating facility and reservoir owned and operated by Metropolitan Water District; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and zoned Light Industrial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 4), the property to the south consists of developed manufacturing and zoned Heavy Industrial, Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 15), the land to the east is developed with apadments and zoned Medium Residential, Eftwanda Specific Plan, and the property to the west is developed manufacturing and zoned General Industrial (Industrial Area Specific Plan, (Subarea 8); and c. The leased site is 415 feet north of Arrow Highway. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-27- NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. December 10, 1997 Page 2 a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) An 8-foot high decorative block wall with decorative cap shall be constructed along the south and west perimeter of the lease site to provide required screening. A decorative solid metal gate shall be provided along the south side to continue the screen across the drive access. 2) An irrigated landscape palette of shrubs and vines shall be planted along the south exterior side of the block wall to soften the appearance of the wall with a minimum 4-foot planter width. (The north and east perimeters of the leased site are screened by existing berms, are not visible from public view, and may be secured by chain link fencing). PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-27 - NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. December 10, 1997 Page 3 3) A minimum of five fast growing columnar trees shall be incorporated into the landscape plan (one tree per 30 linear feet) in order to provide visual softening of the monopole to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Said trees should primarily be located on the south side of the facility. 4) The monopole shall be painted with a white finish to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Engineering Division 1) Remove and replace dead, damaged, or improperly root growing parkway street trees. All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Division and planted per public improvement plans and the current City standards. 2) The irrigated landscape berm which provides screening for Metropolitan Water District's facilities and also provides a portion of the required screening for the subject site shall be restored, prior to occupancy of the subject site and be to the satisfaction of the City Planner, and shall be maintained in good condition by the underlying property owner, Metropolitan Water District. 3) Landscaping along the public right-of-way on the north side of Arrow Highway shall be restored, pdor to occupancy of the subject site and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and shall be maintained in good condition by the underlying property owner, Metropolitan Water District. 4) This facility, and each and every subsequent application for a facility or facilities to provide service for the Nextel Communication's, Inc. cellular network, shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 570, regulating cellular transmission facilities. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-27 - NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. December 10, 1997 Page 4 I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of December 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CON DITIONS PROJECT#: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-27 WIRELESS TRANSMISSION FACILITY NEXTEL COMMUNICATION, INC. NORTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Time Limits Com131etion Date 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not __/__/ issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include / / site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions / / of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and __/ /__ State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be __/ / submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. SC - 6/97 Project No. CUP 97-27 Completion Date All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. / / C. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. For non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. / / D. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. / / In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: E. Site Development The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. / / Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. / / F. Grading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. / / SC - 6/97 Project No. CUP 97-27 Completion Date ~PLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, ,-OR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire District's fire lane standards, as noted: X All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. / / Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear of obstructions at all times, during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. / / A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. / / Gated/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. / / 5. Plan check fees in the amount of $62.50 shall be paid: X Prior to final plan approval. / / Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. / / SC - 6197 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- STAFF RF PORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 10, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Brent Le Count, AICP, Associate Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-23 - BUQUET (TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to establish a night club and sports bar, including entertainment, D.J. music, dancing, satellite television, amusement devices (pool tables, dart boards), and on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages within an existing 7,930 square foot building in the Community Commercial designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1077-601-07. Related File: Entertainment Permit 97-02 (also Conditional Use Permit 94-08 and Entertainment Permit 94-01 previously approved) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 97-02 - BUQUET ('TWINS SPORTS BAR AND GRILL) - A request to allow entertainment including, but not limited to, D.J. music, dancing, satellite television, and amusement devices (pool tables, dart boards) in conjunction with a bar and restaurant in the Community Commercial designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1077-601-07. Related File: Conditional Use Permit 97-23 (also Conditional Use Permit 94-08 and Entertainment Permit 94-01 previously approved) BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing to use a vacant building as a night club and sports bar. The building was the site of the original "Club 66" night club that operated in the City for 13 years. After "Club 66" ceased operation, another night club, "The Peppermint Elephant" used the facility until about 1986. In 1994, the Planning Commission approved a Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit for a night club/sports bar but the business was not opened and the approvals have since expired. Many of these issues identified by staff in reviewing the previous request have been addressed by the applicant with the current project. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North Vacant; Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 3) South Restaurant; Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 3) East Single Family Residence; Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 3) West - Motel and convenience market; Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (Subarea 3) ITEMS H & I J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-23 & EP 97-02 - TWINS SPORTS BAR December 10, 1997 Page 2 So General Plan Designations: Project Site - Commercial North - Commercial South- Commercial East - Commercial West - Commercial Site Characteristics: The site is presently developed with a 7,930 square foot building and a paved parking area. Landscape planters exist adjacent to the building. Do Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Restaurant/Night Club 6,000 1/100 60 60 1,930 1/55 3._.~5 67' 7,930 95 127 ANALYSIS: Ao General: The applicant is proposing a dance floor with D.J. area within the central portion of the building with a "social bar" at the south end and a "sports bar" with pool tables and dart boards at the north end. The applicant is not currently proposing live musical or comedy performances but may wish to include such activities in the future. A complete description of the proposed activities is provided in attached Entertainment Permit application (Exhibit "F"). With the establishment of the use, the applicant is proposing to bring the site up to current Code requriements. Additional parking will be provided at the rear of the site. Landscaping will be provided around the perimeter of the site as well as within the new parking area and adjacent to the building on the north, south, and west sides. A landscape planter with 5-foot high wrought iron fence will be installed in the parking area between the proposed sports bar and the existing motel and convenience mart. A 5-foot high wrought iron fence would also be provided around the perimeter of the site. Decorative treatment will be provided for the driveway entrance off Foothill Boulevard. Lighting will be provided for the building and within the parking area. The parapet along the east elevation will be extended to screen rooftop equipment and to provide a finished appearance to the wall. At the Technical Review Committee meeting, the applicant requested additional entertainment activities. This request was made after the public notice was sent to be advertised in the newspaper so it is not included in the description. If the applicant wishes to pursue additional entertainment, then'the public hearing must be re-advertised for the next available meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-23 & EP 97-02 - TWINS SPORTS BAR December 10, 1997 Page 3 Neighborhood Compatibility: In reviewing the previously approved Conditional Use Permit and Entertainment Permit, staff identified potential conflicts between the existing motel and convenience market to the west and the proposed night club/sports bar. The motel essentially functions with month-to-month rentals and is therefore, similar in nature to an apartment building. As such, the motel is vulnerable to potential noise and outside activities associated with a sports bar operation. Also, the convenience market sells alcoholic beverages so there is potential for problems to occur in the parking area (uncontrolled outdoor consumption of alcohol) as patrons may go back and forth between the sports bar and the market. To mitigate these potential problems, installation of a landscape planter between the sports bar and the motel/convenience market was required. The current proposal includes a 6-foot wide landscape planter with a 5-foot high wrought iron fence between the sports bar area and the motel/convenience market area. The applicant also proposes to station a security guard at the convenience market and outside the proposed sports bar to minimize potential problems. A condition of approval limits the hours of operation and the maximum noise level generated by the establishment, including any live entertainment. Parking Issues: The majority of the parking area is located at the north (rear) end of the building and the main entry is located along the west side of the building. Because of the distance between the parking and the entry, the applicant is proposing valet parking. This will allow the applicant to provide convenience for customers while limiting the number of people in the parking area to aide security. The main entry is also proposed to be moved northerly from it's current location to provide room for vehicle stacking on-site off of Foothill Boulevard. Traffic: The applicant is substantially increasing the parking capacity of the site. There are existing inherent traffic conflicts because of the close proximity of the site to Hermosa Avenue and the adjacent convenience store. To address the increased traffic conflicts, the Engineering Division is conditioning the applicant to install the median island on Foothill Boulevard and consolidate the three existing driveways into one shared driveway. This will prohibit left turn movements to and from the site, thereby eliminating the primary traffic conflict. Security Plan: The applicant proposes to have security personnel both within the building and walking the outside/parking area. Interior security will include a security guard stationed at the dance floor consistent with Entertainment Ordinance requirements. There will also be a video system to monitor the main entrance and each of the cash registers. The security plan, which has been reviewed by the Police Department, is attached as Exhibit "H." Hours of Operation: The applicant is requesting to operate from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. seven days a week. It is recommended that the hours initially be limited to 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight Sunday through Thursday and 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday. This would decrease potential impacts upon the adjacent residential uses during the week while allowing the proposed business reasonable hours. These hours of operation are consistent with the previously approved Conditional Use Permit. The hours of operation could be modified at the six month Planning Commission monitoring review meeting per recommended Conditions of Approval 2 and 13 in the attached Resolution. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-23 & EP 97-02 - TVVINS SPORTS BAR December 10, 1997 Page 4 Go Crime Statistics: Because of the concern over land use compatibility, staff requested a list of police calls received for the last two years in the surrounding area. The Police Department has provided such a list with a map locating the type of crime calls (Exhibit "1"). Note that most of the crimes occurred in the residential areas to the north and south of the project site. Since the building has been empty for the past decade, no crime statistics were requested regarding the previous nightclubs at this address. Environmental Assessment: The application is exempt pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. FACTS FOR FINDING: A. Conditional Use Permit: That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Foothill Boulevard Specific plan. B. Entertainment Permit: That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper, or disorderly manner. 3 That granting the application would not create a public nuisance. That the applicant, or any other person associated with him as principal or partner in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction or any offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of an kind or of a felony or any crime involving the moral turpitude, nor has any approval, permit, license issued in conjunctions with the sale of alcohol or the provision of entertainment been revoked within the preceding five years. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding residential and commercial uses. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-23 & EP 97-02 - TVVlNS SPORTS BAR December 10, 1997 Page 5 That the applicant has not made any false, misleading', or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. In reviewing the finding for both the Conditional Use Permit and the Entertainment Permit, staff believes that the potential incompatibility between the proposed use and the adjoining uses can be addressed through the improvements and procedures proposed by the applicant and the conditions of approval contained in the resolutions for both the Conditional Use Permit and the Entertainment Permit applications. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 97-23 and Entertainment Permit 97-02 through adoption of the attached Resolutions. Brad Buller City Planner BB:BLC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Exhibit "F" Exhibit "G" Exhibit "H" Exhibit "1" Resolution Resolution - Location Map - Site Plan - Floor Plan - Elevations Landscape Plan Entertainment Permit Application Business Description letter Security Plan Crime Statistics of Approval - Conditional Use Permit 97-23 of Approval - Entertainment Permit 97-02 ~0 0 II '. ~ VICINITY MAP ' 5¢4~E 1"=3,3'  NIGHT CLUB ; N 0 T ~ ~. ,~s~ i P A R T FOO~ILL ~ BOULEVARD MICHAEL RESTAURANT EDDIE LAKKEES SITE PLAN FOR NIGHTCLUB REMODELING ;0134 FOOTHILL E~LVC RANCHO CJCAMONOA z~ FLOOR PLAN TWINS 66-TENANT IMPROVEMENT ELEVATION ELEVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS _/ HICH~L "J' LANDSCAPING AND EXTERIOR ~ PLAN STRAWBERRY FIELD LEGEND ENTERTAINblENT PERMIT APPLICATION Applicants for ~ntm, gainment p~itiiits shall complete the following questionaire: PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE A. The name and permanent address of. applica.nt:. ROBBIE L.MCKEES, EDDEE LAKKEES Name 9086 HILLSIDE ROAD ALTA LOMA, CA 9170 t Permanent Address B. The name, proposed and current, i.f any, and business address of the ar~¢licant: TWINS' SPORTS BAR ANrD GRILL Name (Curren[ and Proposed) Business Addres 10134 \V. FOOTHTI.L BL\'T). tL4z\'CHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 C. A detailed deschpt-ion of the proposed entertainment, indud/ng type of entertainment, and number of r>ersons engaged in the entertainment (may attach seperate sh_eets/2: necessary) ROBBIE EDDIT: A2658881 .--k2658880 We Robbie Lakkees and Eddie Lakkees, propose to run and operate a 21 year and over restaurant, Sports Bar and ~m-ill. It will include D. J. Music. dining. dancing. and sport watchin_go via satellite Tx,' Aton$ with food. we plan to serve alcohol Monday through Sunday. We plan to begin employ/ng 25 to 35 persons. v,-ith a goal to employ 50 persons. This includes a high number of security to keep a positive atmosphere and fully controlled environment. Our goal is to provide Rancho Cucamonga with a clean qualit.,,' location for social gatherinS and entertainment. At the same time. we want this establishment to reflect the ciw's heritage with location on Route 66. With our detailed business plan and historic theme. we hope to be profitable for both us and the city. We are open to all comments and./or suggestions. We appreciate your consideration. D. The date or day-of-week, hours and location oi entertainment (attach floorplan), and the adm/ssion fee, it: an)., to be charged: MONDAY - SLrTX,T)Ay 10:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. ADNflSSION FEE: NONE lat this time)** **Holidays and spezial events excluded E. The name(s) of the person(s) responsible for the management or supervision of applicant's business and of any entertainment: ROBBIE LAKKEES EDDIE LAKKEES F. A statement of the nature and character of applicant's business, if any, to be carried on in conjunction with such entertainment, including whether or not alcohol will be served as part of such business: Twin Bar's Grill is divided into two types of Entertainment l_)___S3_o_rts Bar__with__f. ood, and 2) dancinq. include servinq_ Food and Alcho!ic beveraqes. Both parts will G. Whether or not the applicant or any person responsible for the management or supervision of applicant's business have been, within the previous ten years, convicted of a crime, the nature of such offense, and the sentence received therefor including conditions of parole or probation, if any: ?,obbie and Eddie Lakkees do not have previous convictions nor ~3.1eqed offences. H. Whether or not applicant has ever had any permit or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or provision of entertainment revoked, including the date thereof and name of the revoking agency: 1) We have never had an ABC License revoked. 2) No permi. t or licenses in ccnsumptien, with the Sale of Alcohol or Provision of Entertainment has ever been suspended or revoked. Any false, misleading or fraudulent statement of mater~al fact in the required application shall be grounds for denial of the application for an entertainment permit. The Environmental Setting/Existing Site Conditions: Currently the physical setting of 10134 W. Foothill Blvd. is 4.7 acres, the site has two operating businesses, an apartment type motel and a convince market. There is a parking lot separating the established businesses and the ten year vacant building where the proposed bar and grill resides. This 7,930 square foot vacant building was formally known as Club 66. The remainder of the property consists of open fields and one tree. A portion of the open field will be developed and used for additional parking. Proposed Land Uses: The primary goal is to develop this building and land surrounding to keep up with the current trend of Rancho Cucamonga, and make it a clean and pleasant sight. We will plant multiple trees and planters that will be irrigated. We will also construct a new parking lot, which will be located to the rear of 10134 W. Foothill Blvd. Moreover, we anticipate, the location of this parking lot should minimize traffic congestion on Foothill Blvd. The proposed use of the location commonly known as 10134 W. Foothill Blvd., is a general business commercial venture that fits within the cities commercial zone ordinances. We propose to run and operate a 21 year and over restaurant, sports bar and grill. It will include D.J. music, dining, dancing and sport watching via satellite, live band and comedy are not, at this time included; but do not want to be excluded. Our sports bar and grill will include pool tables and dart boards. Along with food we plan to serve alcohol Monday through Sunday. We plan to begin employing 25 to 35 persons, with a goal to employ 50 persons. This includes a high number of security to keep a positive atmosphere and a fully controlled environment. Our goal is also to provide Rancho Cucamonga with a clean quality location for social gathering and entertainment. At the same time, we want this establishment to reflect the City's heritage with its historical location on Route 66. Compatibility: The property to the West contains a motel and a convenience market. While most motels operate on a night-to night arrangement, the motel actually functions more like an apartment complex with week-to-week rentals. As witnessed with previous entertainment uses, bars/restaurants in close proximity to residential uses have had a tendency to create noise problems for the residents. Previously on this property, all that separated the bar and grill and the motel was a paved parking area. In recognition, to provide buffering between the uses, we will build a wall between the two sites to alleviate the headlights from shining into the motel and to minimize noise. Since the convenience market has approval by the Planning Commission to sell alcoholic beverages (distilled spirits), we will want to regulate the flow of traffic between sites, to prevent consumers from drinking in the parking lot. To achieve this we will landscape a planter between the two sites. Also, the Police recommend a security guard be stationed in the parking area in the evening, we agree, and are will staff accordingly. Twin's Sport~ Bar & Grill Employee Tifie and Job Description 10134 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Below are Twin's job descriptions. Attached is the opening staff schedule. When and if business calls for a greattea' or lesser stafl~ there will be schedule changes made to insure MANAGER: Managers will oversee their entire shiit's operat/ons. They will supervise traffic flow, security stations, and employee productivity. Managers will be responsible for scheduling staff; hiring employees and termination of employees. They will assist in monitoring I.D. verification. SECURITY: Security will be responsible for insuring the safety and security of customers and employees as well as the facility. They will be held accoumable for the defusing of any aggravated situation in their designated area. They will be required to correctly facilitate the use of hand transmitter radios and aid other security stations as needed. Security will assist in monitoring I.D. verification. BEVERAGE AND FOOD SERVER: Beverage and food servers will provide all help necessary to serve customers. This includes verifying I.D., order taking, delivery of food and beverages, and clearing tables as needed. Greeting and seating customer is required. They will also be able to exercise the denial of service to any customer. BARTENDER: Bartender's respons~ility will be to over see all behind the bar activity as well as tending customers. This includes stocking bar, maintaining clean glasses and dishes. Order taking and cashiering will also be required, in addition to processing the beverage server's tickets. Checking I.D. of customers, once again to insure correct age requirements. They will also be able to refuse service to any customers. COOK: Cooks will prepare food orders. They will also stock and maimain kitchen as necessary, clean and sanitize kitchen equipment. They will be responsible to keep kitchen up to Health Codes and ordinances. JANITOR: Janitors primary function will be to keep the entire facility clean and sanitized. The janitor will clean and maimain sanitary bathrooms. They will maintain all bathroom paper products and soaps. The janitor will vacuum and clean all floors. In addition, they will dust and change any light bulbs as needed. They will dispose of all trash, and recycle bottles. They will also wash all linen. Twins Sports Bar & Grill Security Plan 10134 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Twins' security system is a proposed proactive security team made up of three levels of personael. First level, licensed weaponless seca.dry guards; second, door attendants and third, an operations manager that will be staffed at all times of operating hours. Our goal is to provide a clean and safe establishment for our staff and eliemele and the city of Rancho Cucamonga. As an illustration, we will staff security appropriately, depending on the traffic flow of our business. Entrance and Inside: At Twin's main entrance we will place one door attendant in the day and in the evening we will add one security attendant. Their jobs include ehoeking idemification and enforcing all codes. We will have at least one security attendant at all times in the daytime hours. We will staff one security attendant on the dance floor when dancing is present. We designed our floor plan to enable us to easily identify any problems and quickly resolve them. We will add and subtract attendants depending on our occupancy. Outside and Parking Lot: Twins' outside security will consist of two security guards in a well lit parking lot at all times during the evening hours of operation. As a result, our clientele will be moving and not loitering. We will place one security attendant in from and around the convenience store. Once again to help minimize loitering and the consumption of alcoholic beverages around the store or in the parking lot. The second security guard will also patrol parking in addition to the main building. Additional Efforts: In our willingness to provide Rancho Cucamonga with a safe place of social gathering, we discussed our security ideas with Rancho Cucamonga ShedIFs Department and The Crime Prevention Unit. In summary, we will install a security earnera at the main entrance to assist in clientele identification if a situation should call for such. To assist with any internal affairs we will also install cameras to monitor each cash register. To insure a rapid response security team, our security systems will be in constant communication with one another. Twins' entrance security, inside security, and parking lot security will use H/T (Hand Transmitter Radios). The lighting in the parking lot will have a minimum of one foot candlelight on the pavement surface. We will also light the east side of the building. Correspondingly, we will remove all shrubs and furnish a clear walk way on the east of the building. In addition, there were suggestions of a wrought iron fence on the Southeast corner of the building facing Foothill. We agree this will add to additional security efforts and therefore we will build it. 11/24/97 Footherm Calls Summary for last 2 years .25mi radius from the intersection of Foothill / Hermosa Part 1 Crime Count Homicide Rape Robb Weap Robb Strgarm ADW Burglary Res Burglary Com Burglary Veh Grand Theft Auto Theft Assault 1 1 0 1 23 15 9 11 5 20 16 TOTAL 102 Part 2 Crime Forgery Fraud Sex Felony Sex Misd Narcotics Alcohol Viol Drunk Disord Cond DUI Vandalism Arson Receiving Theft TOTAL Count 0 2 5 0 17 1 9 8 59 17 1 0 19 138 Weapons Concealed Felony Misd Shooting TOTAL Count 0 0 0 0 Day of Week Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Count 56 39 44 35 61 67 47 Page 1 TOTAL ~11/24/97 Day of Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 TOTAL Footherm 349 Calls Summary for last 2 years .25mi radius from the intersection of Foothill / Hermosa Count 13 9 22 11 11 13 14 7 11 13 11 11 12 7 5 10 11 18 9 6 12 8 11 12 t0 9 15 14 12 12 10 349 Month January February March April May June July August September October November December TOTAL Count 23 31 37 29 24 24 24 33 33 32 42 17 349 Page 2 Footherm 11/24/97 Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 TOTAL Calls Summary for last 2 years .25mi radius from the intersection of Foothill / Hermosa Count 0 0 0 0 141 208 0 0 349 3 Time Block 0000-0059 0100-0159 0200-0259 0300-0359 0400-0459 0500-0559 0600-0659 0700-0759 0800-0859 0900-0959 1000-1059 1100-1159 1200-1259 1300-1359 1400-1459 1500-1559 1600-1659 1700-1759 1800-1859 1900-1959 2000-2059 2100-2159 2200-2259 2300-2359 TOTAL Count 28 34 16 5 4 5 6 8 13 17 13 19 12 10 18 24 18 17 6 12 13 22 15 14 349 Page 3 ~ [rl m .x' DORSET Layers HIGHWAY% N STR E RAILROADS -- %IREElS Miles · Da[apoinL o 0.05 (,'~ Robb Strgorrn · !. ADW Burg Res Burg Comrn Burg Vein Grand Theft GTA Assault A Forgery C 'lIE% -- I FREEWAYS Fruud .Sex Felony Sex iisd Narcotics Alcohol Viol I;' Drunk ':',' Disor'd Cond i~' Vandalism ,~L Arson Receiving Theft ! WP-Concealcd WP-Felony WP-iisd WP-Shooting ~i~ Car Jacking Graffiti Misd ~ Graffiti Felony · Out of Range RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-23 FOR A NIGHT CLUB AND SPORTS BAR, INCLUDING ENTERTAINMENT, D.J. MUSIC, DANCING, SATELLITE TELEVISION, AMUSEMENT DEVICES (POOL TABLES, DART BOARDS), AND ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WITHIN AN EXISTING 7,930 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 3) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 10134 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND MAKING FINDINGS IS SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-601-07 A. Recitals. 1. Chades Joseph and Associates has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 97-23, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of December 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 10, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 214 feet on Foothill Boulevard and 220 feet on Hermosa Avenue and is presently improved with a motel, convenience market, and vacant restaurant/night club building; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated for commercial uses and is vacant, the property to the south consists of a restaurant, the property to the east is developed with a residence, and the property to the west is occupied by a motel and convenience market; and c. Night clubs serving alcoholic beverages and/or providing entertainment are allowed in the Community Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan subject to review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit application; and d. The subject property is within a designated Activity Center pursuant to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e. The development of the night club and sports bar is consistent with the Community Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Commercial designation of the General Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-23 - TWINS BAR & GRILL December 10, 1997 Page 2 f. The application proposes to upgrade the site to include providing additional parking and landscaping consistent with the requirements of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Development Code; and g. The application, with the attached conditions of approval, will comply with all applicable standards of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located in that the use provides a neighborhood/district level commercial service including commercial recreation activities. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity because the applicant will implement a security system and certain site improvements to control activities related to the use; and c. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code since the applicant is upgrading the existing parking area to meet current standards. 4. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Division 1) All conditions of approval contained in the resolution of approval for Entertainment Permit 97-02 shall apply. 2) The days and hours of operation shall be limited to between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight Sunday through Thursday and 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The hours of operation may be modified at the six month Planning Commission monitoring review per Condition 16 below. 3) Upon removal of the two driveways in front of the convenience store, landscaping shall be installed. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and City Engineer, prior to building permit issuance. 4) The existing roofing shall be painted a color complimentary to the building, prior to occupancy to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Within three years of occupancy, the roofing shall be replaced with entirely new material subject to City Planner review and approval. The new material shall have an integral color and not be painted. /-] ,I Al PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-23 - TWINS BAR & GRILL December 10, 1997 Page 3 5) Wrought iron fencing shall be decorative and include decorative masonry pilasters to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 6) Any exterior changes to the building, including but not limited to, awnings, windows, and signs, shall be subject to review and approval by the City Planner. 7) Roof screening shall be provided on all sides to screen views of the existing and any new rooftop equipment. The final design of the screen shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, prior to the issuance of building permits or the commencement of use, whichever comes first. 8) Landscaping and hard scape shall be installed across the Foothill Boulevard frontage within the 25-foot building setback area, as measured form the ultimate curb, consistent with the requirements of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Activity Center. The developer may defer the portion within the public right-of-way subject to contribution towards future construction which shall be provided prior to building permit issuance. 9) The final plans for accent paving at the project entry outside the public right-of-way shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, prior to building permit issuance or commencement of use, whichever comes first. 10) The building shall be repainted. The final color shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner, prior to building permit issuance or commencement of use, whichever occurs first. 11) Security personnel shall be provided within the parking area at all times during evening and night hours. 12) Approval is granted for a night club/sports bar with D.J. music, dancing, satellite television, and amusement devices (pool tables, dart boards) as identified in Entertainment Permit 97-02. No adult entertainment is permitted. 13) If the operation of the business creates law enforcement and/or fire safety problems, such as but not limited to, loitering and disturbances, noise, overcrowding, blocked fire exits, etc., the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration of modification and/or revocation. 14) All existing signs shall be removed or modified, subject to City Planner review and approval of a Sign Permit, to conform to the City's Sign Ordinance. 15) A copy of this resolution and the resolution for Entertainment Permit 97- 02 shall be attached to any lease for this space. 16) The Conditional Use Permit herein granted shall be monitored and brought back to the Planning Commission within six months from the date of occupancy to review compliance with all conditions of approval PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-23-TVVINS BAR & GRILL December10,1997 Page 4 and applicable City Ordinances. Failure to comply with the conditions of approval or applicable City Ordinances shall cause the suspension of the Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. Engineering Division: 1) Contribution towards the cost of construction for full frontage improvements on Hermosa Avenue shall be provided, prior to building permit issuance. 2) Contribution towards the cost of construction for full frontage improvements on Foothill Boulevard shall be provided, prior to building permit issuance. 3) Install the median, including landscaping and irrigation, of Foothill Boulevard. a) The minimum limits of the median shall be determined by Caltrans and the City Engineer. The existing pavement shall be widened as necessary to accommodate the median, four travel lanes, and sufficient shoulder within the existing right-of-way. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement as redevelopment/development occurs to the full amount, less the value of the street frontage. b) If all other conditions of approval have been met to occupy the structure and Caltrans has not determined if the median will be allowed, the applicant may post a cash deposit or other security acceptable to the City Engineer to cover the cost of the median installation. The deposit amount shall be approved by the City Engineer and shall be paid pdor to occupance of the structure. An agreement shall be processed with the deposit outlining the responsibility of the applicant to continue the processing with Caltrans for the installation of the median island. c) If Caltrans does not allow installation of the median at this time, contribution towards one-half the cost of construction of the Foothill Boulevard median, including landscaping and irrigation per linear foot of frontage, shall be provided, prior to building permit issuance. 4) An ingress/egress easement shall be provided for all adjacent properties. 5) Connection to the pdvate drainage system which flows into the back of the basin on Hermosa Avenue requires structural analysis. Substantiate both the structural integrity of the existing basin with the proposed connection and the structural integrity of the method of connection to the basin. 6) The vehicle stacking distance from Foothill Boulevard shall be a minimum of 75 feet from the ultimate face of curb. The final plans shall reflect this requirement and shall be reviewed by the City Engineer, prior to the issuance of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. CUP 97-23 - TWINS BAR & GRILL December 10, 1997 Page 5 7) The three driveways fronting Foothill Boulevard on this site shall be consolidated into one standard 35-foot commercial driveway. The ddveway location shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, prior to building permit issuance. 8) A contribution towards the cost of construction of one-fourth of the special pavers within the Foothill Boulevard/Hermosa Avenue intersection shall be paid to the City, prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee amount shall be based on the square footage of the intersection. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Buller, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of December 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CON DITIONS PROJECT#: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-23 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOP, NIGHT CLUB/SPORTS BAR CHARLES JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES 10134 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Time Limits 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. Completion Date / / B. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. / / Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. / / Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. / / Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. SC - 6/97 Go Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Project No. CUP 97-23 Completion Date / / ¸8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 11. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 12. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debds at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 13. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." 14. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 15. Hours of operation shall be restricted to 10 a.m. until 2 a.m. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / SC - 6/97 Project No. CUP 97-23 Completion Date Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). / / All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. / / Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. / / Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. / / / / / / / / 2. A minimum of 30% shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. / / Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. / / All walls and fences shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. / / Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. / / Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. / / Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. / / SC - 6/97 Project No. CUP 97-23 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: G. Site Development The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. / / Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. / / H. Grading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. / / / / Vehicular access rights shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets, except for approved openings: J. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. / / 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Corn Media Bike Street Name & Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees m n Trail Gutter Trail Island Foothill Blvd. X X Other Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per STD. 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. SC - 6/97 Ko Project No, CUP 97-23 Comoletion Date Improvement Plans and Construction: Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. / / Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. / / Notes: (1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch (at intersections) or 2-inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. / / Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. / / g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / / installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. / / A permit shall be obtained from Caltrans for any work within the following right-of-way: Foothill Boulevard. / / Public Maintenance Areas A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: Foothill Boulevard. / / SC * 6/97 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. L. Utilities 1. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTION/NEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 4??-27'30, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. General Fire Protection Conditions 1. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: X Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. X California Code Regulations Title 24. 2. Emergency access, a minimum of 26 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear of obstructions at all times, during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. 3. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 4. Plan check fees in the amount of $62.50 shall be paid: X Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 5. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15. Special Permits 1. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: a. Places of assembly (except churches, schools, and other non-profit organizations). Project No. CUP 97-23 Completion Date / / / / / / / / / / / / / / SC - 6/97 6 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 97-02, A REQUEST TO ALLOW ENTERTAINMENT INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, D.J. MUSIC, DANCING, SATELLITE TELEVISION, AND AMUSEMENT DEVICES (POOL TABLES, DART BOARDS) IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SPORTS BAR AND NIGHT CLUB IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 3) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 10134 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD- APN: 1077-601-07 A. Recitals. 1. On May 21, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 290 providing for the regulation of entertainment. 2. Charles Joseph and Associates has filed an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit No. 97-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 3. On the 10th day of December 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forlh in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on December 10, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard with a street frontage of 214 feet on Foothill Boulevard and 220 feet on Hermosa Avenue and is presently improved with a motel, convenience market. and vacant restaurant/night club building; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the property to the south consists of a restaurant, the property to the east is developed with a residence, and the property to the west is occupied by a motel and convenience market; and c. Night clubs serving alcoholic beverages and/or providing entertainment are allowed in the Community Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan subject to review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit application; and The subject property is within a designated Activity Center pursuant to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 97-02 o TWINS BAR & GRILL December 10, 1997 Page 2 The development of the night club/sports bar is consistent with the Community Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Commercial designation of the General Plan; and The application proposes to upgrade the site to include providing additional parking and landscaping consistent with the requirements of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Development Code; and The application, with the attached conditions of approval, will comply with all applicable standards of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would not be contrary to the public health, safety, morals or welfare; and b. That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improper or disorderly manner; and c. That the applicant, or any person associated with him as principal or partner or in a position or capacity involving partial or total control over the conduct of the business for which such permit is sought to be issued, has not been convicted in any court of competent jurisdiction of any offense involving the presentation, exhibition, or performance of any obscene show of any kind or of a felony or of any crime involving moral turpitude or has not had any approval, permit, or license issued in conjunction with the sale of alcohol or the provisions of entertainment revoked within the preceding five years.; and d. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance; and e. That the normal operation of the premises would not interfere with the peace and quiet of the surrounding commercial center and adjacent apartment complex; and f. That the applicant has not made any false, misleading, or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified in this Resolution is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application, subject to each and every condition set forth below: Planning Division 1) This approval is only for D.J. music, dancing, satellite television, and amusement devices (pool tables, dart boards) in conjunction with a PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 97-02 - TWINS BAR & GRILL December 10, 1997 Page 3 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) sports grill and night club. Any change of intensity or type of entertainment shall require a modification to this permit. 12) The days and hours of operation shall be limited to between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m. midnight Sunday through Thursday and 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday. The hours of operation may be modified at the six month Planning Commission monitoring review per Condition 13 below. No adult entertainment, as defined in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Section 17.04.090, shall be permitted. Entertainment shall be conducted inside the building. When entertainment is being conducted, doors and windows shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. Extedor noise levels shall not exceed 65 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and 60 dB during the hours from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. Access to the lounge/entertainment area must be from the main entrance to the pdmary use and not from a separate exterior entrance. Other exits shall be for "Fire Exit Only." If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses, or operations including, but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances, the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible suspension or revocation of the permit. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, o'r any other City Ordinances. This permit shall be renewed annually by the applicant per Municipal Code Section 5.12.115. A minimum of one duly licensed, certified or trained, and regularly employed security guard from a reputable secudty firm shall be required to be on the premises from 8 p.m. until the parking lot is cleared after the conclusion of any entertainment. The guard shall be in "peace officer" attire and shall remain on duty in the parking area and outside adjacent areas of the facility to avert problems such as loud noise, disorderly conduct from patrons or anyone in the parking lot, loitering activities, and any other nuisances or disturbances. The applicant shall submit a monthly entertainment schedule for City Planner review for compliance with approved entertainment. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. EP 97-02 - TVVlNS BAR & GRILL December 10, 1997 Page 4 13) The Entertainment Permit herein granted shall be monitored and brought back to the Planning Commission within six months from the date of occupancy to review compliance with all conditions of approval and applicable City Ordinances. Failure to comply with the conditions of approval or applicable City Ordinances shall cause the suspension of the Entertainment Permit by the Planning Commission. Fire District/Building & Safety Division 1) The maximum number of occupants shall not exceed building and fire codes. The maximum occupancy for each room shall be posted as determined by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and/or the City's Fire Prevention Unit Division. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER 1997. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E. David Barker, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Bullet, Secretary I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of December 1997, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 10, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Steve Hayes, AICP, Associate Planner CONSIDERATION OF RELOCATION FOR PUBLIC ART WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA PROM!:NADE SHOPPING CF:NTER - A request to reconsider the required locations for two pieces of public art within the Terra Vista Promenade Shopping Center, located at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue -APN: 227-151-38 through 50. Project File: Conditional Use Permit 95-11. ABSTRACT: The purpose of this item is for the Planning Commission to consider a request from Lewis Management Corporation, the owner/developer of the Terra Vista Promenade Shopping Center, to review and interpret an adopted Condition of Approval from Resolution No. 95-140 for the project. The Condition in question relates to the designated locations of the two required pieces of art within the shopping center (Condition No. 38, highlighted and attached as Exhibit "C"). The developer is requesting to have the location for one of the pieces of art moved from the Activity Center area near the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue to the median planter area near the main vehicular entrance/exit, off Foothill Boulevard, north of the ARCO and Carl's Jr. pad buildings. The approved and proposed locations of the revised art are shown on Exhibit "B." The developer feels that the art piece designed and built to meet this condition of approval is incompatible with the architecture approved for the Old Spaghetti Factory Restaurant (Conditional Use Permit 97-16). Staff is in full agreement with this position. The art piece is currently in storage and the developer feels that the proposed new location is much more appropriate. Understanding the need for art at the Activity Center location, the developer has talked to staff about providing a third piece of art, a lower profile piece of greater compatibility with the new building and Activity Center. This art piece would be an addition to the two larger pieces of art within the shopping center. ANALYSIS: Staff has brought this item before the Commission to receive direction and interpretation that 1) the proposed relocation of the revised Activity Center art piece and the addition of a third art piece at the Activity Center meets the intent of the original condition of approval relative to the requirement for art within the Terra Vista Promenade Shopping Center. The Commission can make the interpretation or give staff direction through minute action as to any further processing of this request. An amendment to the Conditional Use Permit will be required if the Planning Commission can not interpret that the intent of the original condition of approval is being fulfilled with the applicant's (new) proposal. ITEM J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TERRA VISTA PROMENADE December 10, 1997 Page 2 Dudng the processing of the Conditional Use Permit for the Old Spaghetti Factory Restaurant, the issue of the potential incompatibility between the commissioned and designed art piece and the architectural design and site planning of the restaurant was highlighted for discussion of the Design Review Committee. The conceptual plans clearly reflected the art piece on the colored elevations and the Committee determined that the commissioned art piece would "clash" architecturally as well as conflict with the pad location and pedestrian circulation in front of the building. The approved colored elevations for use will be posted at the meeting showing the art pieces. The Committee recommended that a bust or similar art piece more complimentary to the architecture of Old Spaghetti Factory Restaurant could be commissioned and designed for the pedestrian Activity Center space in front of the building. (Please refer to the highlighted comments in Exhibit "D" for specific comments regarding this issue). The shopping center developer and the development team from Old Spaghetti Factory Restaurant have acknowledged this comment and it is staffs understanding that the developers are willing to provide a lower profile and compatible art piece in this general location. Staff is of the opinion that the request to relocate one of the two required art pieces and producing a third, lower profile art piece near Old Spaghetti Factory Restaurant is in keeping with the intent of the odginal condition of approval. The new location is very prominent and would serve as a focal point for the main project entrance. Pedestrian accessibility to the art piece would be an issue to consider with this modification, but staff feels that a solution to this concern can be addressed between the developer and staff, possibly by extending existing walkways adjacent to Carl's Jr. and ARCO northward to the location of the art piece and introducing additional areas of special paving at key pedestrian crossings on internal driveways. Staff will continue to work with the developer on providing a piece of art in an acceptable format and location in the Activity Center plaza area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the developer's request and recommend by minute action that the developer's proposal is in keeping with the intent of the original Condition of Approval and no further action related to this request is necessary. Respecff_.ully submitted, City Planner BB:SH:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" - Letter from Applicant - Shopping Center Master Plan - Condition No. 38 from Resolution No. 95-140 - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated June 3, 1997 for Old Spaghetti Factory - Art Piece Elevation lewis Homes Retail 1156 N. Mountain Avenue/P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91785-0670 909/985-0971 FAX 909/949-6740 · di~',ion ef L~i= Hon~s/V~n"e~'m~nt Co~p. REOEIVED October 30, 1997 VIA HAND DF:LIVFRY Mr. Steve Hayes Associate Planner CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10.500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 OCT 3 0 1997 City of Rancho Cucamonga PJanning Division RE: ART PIECE ENTITLED "NATURE'S CYCLE" BY JILL CASTY DESIGN Dear Steve: As you know, our original intent was to install the subject art piece directly behind the fountain at the corner of Rochester & Foothill. Fortunately, for both the community and Lewis Development Co., we were able to finalize negotiations to construct an Old Spaghetti Factory restaurant at this same corner which, unfortunately, proved to be incompatible with the proposed "art piece." Realizing that we need to install the "art piece" at our earliest possible opportunity, we have determined that the most practical relocation area would be in the center island behind the new Carl's Jr. and Arco projects. We believe that this center island location will enhance the aesthetically pleasing drive approach and bring a sense of welcome to the Terra Vista Promenade. In preliminary talks with other members of Your Planning Department, there seemed to be concurrence that this would be an adequate alternative. Recognizing that a second "art piece" is required, we propose that it be located in line with this location, but in the sidewalk area directly in front of our Phase II retail buildings. We would design a large plaza type area that would include both the second "art piece" and architecturally-compatible hardscape. I have enclosed a site plan which depicts both of these proposed locations. I would appreciate your approval of this concept at your earliest possible convenience; if ycu need more information, please call me at (909)949-6602. Sincerely, and Project Management Z:\WP\GARY~LETTERS~ARTPIECE.R CL The Old .. ·/S paghet ti'. Factory at Promenade -. FEOLA CARLI & ARCHULETA ARCHI1[CIS NORTH TVPSIIE C; SEP1 lb tgg7 FOOTHILL FOOTHILL B L V_~6~ Resolution No. 95-140 Page 8 ~ Center at ~ 38) Two works of art shall be placed; one at the Activity ~ the comer of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue, and one at the terminus of the main driveway from Foothill Boulevard in front of the west side of Major 6~ "'*~a~ 39) The art piece at the Activity Center shall be installed within 180 days after the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for Home Depot. The art piece at the terminus of the main driveway from Foothill Boulevard in front of the west side of Major 6 shall be installed prior to occupancy of Building 6. 40) The property owner and/or trustee shall be responsible to maintain the two art works focal elements for the life of this commercial center. 41) The property owner and/or the tenant shall be responsible to ensure all shopping carts are collected and stored at the approved designated place at the end of the work day. 42) Public telephones shall be placed inside the building. Placement of outside public telephones may be allowed and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval pdor to installation. 43) Placement of newspaper racks and other street fumiture, etc. may be allowed subject to City Planner review and approval prior to installation. 44) A portion of the Activity Center shall be completed with Phase One development. The final design of the Activity Center and the phasing of improvements shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permit for Phase One. 45) The design of the Activity Center, including the art piece, the pedestrian furniture, and focal elements such as a water feature shall incorporate features that exhibit the heritage of the historic citrus industry in the City. This coordinated vocabulary of design features shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permit for Phase One. 1) l=ngineedng Division Foothill Boulevard shall be constructed as follows, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, subject to modification by and approval of Caltrans, with Phase One development: DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:2C m. Steve Hayes June 3, 1997 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-16 - OSF INTERNATIONAL. INC. - A request to construct a 12,664 square foot restaurant with a full bar facility on a 3.16 acre pad within the Terra Vista Promenade Shopping Center within the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-151-39. Design Parameters: The site is a vacant pad within the Terra Vista Promenade directly behind the fountain and activity center improvements at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. To the north and west are vacant pad areas within the shopping center. On the east side of Rochester Avenue is a vacant area that is zoned Office and to the south across Foothill Boulevard is the Masi project, with Denny's Restaurant directly across the street. The pad has been rough-graded and hydro seeded and slopes gently from north to south. No significant vegetation of structures exist on the property. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Is a metal roof material appropriate? The applicant is proposing a "signature" architectural concept, with a standing seam metal roof as a primary design element. Planning Commission policy has been to pursue an'integrated design for pad buildings in shopping centers and, in general, to discourage the use of corrugated metal roofs. Metal roofing was originally proposed as an element in the design guidelines for the Terra Vista Promenade Shopping Center but eliminated as a majority of the Planning Commissioners at that time discouraged its use. However, in this situation, staff feels that the use of the metal roof is complimentary to the overall building architecture, but by no means should represent a precedent-setting situation for future buildings throughout the City. Staff feels that the architectural style is in keepinq with the heritage type of architecture recommended for pad buildings in the center. Is the plaza size and shape adequate? The approved Conceptual Master Plan for the shopping center showed two smaller buildings flanking the on-site focal point feature (see Exhibit "A"). The dimensions of this feature per the previously approved plans are shown on the enlargement of this area (Exhibit "B"). With the proposed layout under the new application, this area will be significantly reduced. However, during the processing of the Master Plan for the shopping center, the Planning Commission noted that the developer was proposing an on-site focal element that was far beyond the Commission's expectations and that something more to the scale that has been proposed on other Activity Center corners was anticipated. Staff feels the plaza meets the intent of the Foothill Boulevard Design Supplement and the Terra Vista Community Plan. Should the outdoor dining area be relocated to adjoin the Activity Center plaza? The public entrance faces Foothill instead of the plaza. Staff recommends that the "activity center" be reinforced by shifting the outdoor dining. This would create a lively, people filled space, improve privacy of dining area by moving it away from main customer access to restaurant, improve traffic noise sound attenuation by proximity to the soothing water sounds of the fountain, and give a greater sense of spaciousness to the dining area. DRC COMMENTS CUP 97-16 - OSF INTERNATIONAL, INC. June 3, 1997 Page 2 Does the building architecture feature 360 degree treatment? The north elevation of the building has large areas of blank wall. Staff recommends that the north elevation be upgraded to the same level of treatment and detail as the other elevations. Should landscaping be provided along north and west elevations? These elevations have very little landscaping and are characterized by an abrupt transition from large parking lots to sidewalk, to building walls. Staff recommends additional landscaping. particularly trees. along these elevations to soften the building and provide a setting appropriate for a signature restaurant. For example, the sidewalk along the north side of the building could be eliminated and replaced with a landscape planter large enough to accommodate specimen size trees. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. .An alternative location for the art piece should be considered by the Committee, since staff feels the style of the art is not compatible with the proposed building architecture. Further, the art piece will be much closer to the building than in the original scheme. 2. Additional pedestrian lighting should be provided in the activity center frontage area. o Roof-mounted signs are not allowed by the Sign Ordinance. Alternative sign locations should be explored consistent. with the Uniform Sign Program and Sign Ordinance. Special paving should be used at the two access points to the parcel and within the handicapped parking spaces. In addition, a regular curb should be used to separate the parking spaces from the walkway adjacent to the building, as opposed to the wheel stops shown in this area. Landscaping should be provided at the end of the north/south parking row on the north side of the building as well as in the finger of special paving at the end of the parking row near the northwest corner of the building. The wall on the west side of the stairs leading down to the Foothill Boulevard Activity Center sidewalk should have the flagstone material applied that is used on the existing fountain. Vines should be provided to grow over the overhead trellis in the outdoor eating area to provide additional shade. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. Materials such as, but not limited to, trellis columns and members, fence and wall materials, special paving, light standards, trash enclosures, etc., should be applied consistently as already used in the shopping center and identical with those materials already used throughout the shopping center and the approved design guidelines. The proposed transformer should be screened from view through the use of low walls, landscaping, or a combination thereof. A combination of berming and a low flagstone wall should be used to screen the new parking areas from Foothill Boulevard. DRC COMMENTS CUP 97-16- OSFINTERNATIONAL, INC. June 3,1997 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project to the Planning Commission with conditions as outlined above. Attachments Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Brad Buller, Bill Bethel, Peter Tolstoy Staff Planner: Steve Hayes The Design Review Committee directed the applicant to work with staff on the following issues in preparation for the Planning Commission public hearing: The proposed metal roof element was not acceptable as presented. The Committee directed the applicant to look into the possibility of providing a copper roof on the building or, if that option is not cost effective, a revised roof scheme be designed. The Committee accepted the proposed signs on the east and west elevations of the building. However, on the so.uth elevation, the corporate logo sign should be used near the southeast corner of the building. The shopping center developer agreed to look into alternate locations for the designed art piece already considered for the fountain/gathering area. A different piece of art more complimentary to the architectural concept of the proposed building could be provided in the area where the original art piece was to the provided. The proposed outdoor waiting area was found to be acceptable in its proposed location. However, if an outdoor eating area is pursued in the future, the Committee recommended that it be adjacent to the outdoor focal point area on the east side of the building. The door to the electrical panel should be relocated to a wall face that does not directly face the parking lot on the north side of the building. The blank face of wall on the north elevation closest to the parking lot should be upgraded architecturally, possibly by introducing the small recesseed window elements. Also, along the north side of the building, two parking spaces in front of the blank wall area should be removed and planters provided in these areas that area large enough to accomodate speciman size trees. Additional landscaping should be introduced in areas along the west side of the building, such as plants trained to espaliers that can grow up the sides of the building. The shrub hedge already used along the edge of parking areas within the shopping center should be sufficent to screen new parking areas from view of the public streets. Secondary issues 2, 4, 6 and 7 and Policy issues 1 recommended Conditions of Approval for the project. and 2 will be incorporated into the 12/08/9T ~0N 19:05 FAZ 619 4520181 R[~IO'S RESTAbq~Ah~r$ ~002 December 8, 1997 Nancy Fong City ofRaacho Cucamoaga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Patio Furniture in Terra Vista Town Center Rubio's Baja Grill Dear Nancy: We received the staffrcpor~ advising ua of the Pann~ag Commission meeting on December 10~, 1998 to review request to use palapas on the~patlo of our re~o-ta~t inthe Terra Vista Towa Center. We would like to have a rcpre..~e~tive attend the meeting but due to scl~:!uling conflicts no one will be able to axtexd the meethag scheduled 'for December 10, 1998. Therefore we are requesting eontLauanee of our case to the Januazy 14~, 1998 meetiu~ in order for us to have a representative can be there to present our Please eotff~:m you receipt of this request by ca~ling me dkecfiy at (619) 452-1770. Siacerely, RUBIO'S RESTAURANTS, INC. Ted Fm~~- - Director of Real Estate Rubto's R~tauma~ Inc. 5151 Shoreh~-m Phcc - .ca;ke --'~') ' San 13iego, C-0iliarrlm 921'o ~c,~..' 619/452-177,'~ f~x 619/,152-01~1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: December 10, 1997 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner PATIO FURNITURE IN TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER- RUBIO'S BAJA GRILL/LEWIS HOMES - A request to consider a corporate design, thatched (palapas) style, of outdoor patio umbrellas for a 2,200 square foot restaurant in a multi-tenant pad building, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Aspen Drive and west of Montgomery Wards - APN: 1077-421-76. BACKGROUND: RubJo's Baja Grill restaurant is located in a multi-tenant pad building (Exhibit "A") within Terra Vista Town Center. One of Rubio's corporate identities is the use of thatched-style, palapas umbrellas for their outdoor patio area. Their proposal to use this style of umbrella requires review because the design is different from the uniform street furniture design approved by the Planning Commission for Terra Vista Town Center (Conditional Use Permit 88-12). ANALYSIS: Approved Uniform Street Furniture: A typical condition of approval for the development of a commercial center includes the submission of a uniform design of street furniture for Design Review Committee or City Planner review and approval. The developer, Lewis Homes, submitted designs of street furniture that included patio tables, chairs, umbrellas, light poles, waste containers, planter pots, pattern and color of hardscape, etc. The design was approved by the Design Review Committee in January of 1989. Exhibit "B" shows the approved patio furniture in the Food Court area. The approved umbrellas are of canvas material with solid colors that match the table colors, which is burgundy or aqua-blue. Boston Market, Java City Cafe, and other food users have complied and use the approved design. RubJo's Palapas Umbrella - Thatched Style: Representatives from Rubio's were informed of the patio furniture design criteria in March of 1997. Rubio's went through plan check process between July and September and was informed again that staff cannot approve their palapas umbrellas. On September 25, 1997, staff approved their tenant improvement plans, minus the proposed palapas umbrellas, so they could proceed with interior construction. The restaurant is now open for business. Representatives of Rubio's stated that palapas is part of their corporate identity and they have to use them in their outdoor patio area. Because commercial centers approved after 1984 have complied with the condition of approval to set up a uniform design of street furniture and tenants within those centers have complied with the criteria, allowing the use of palapas umbrellas, a corporate identity, will set a precedent for the entire City. Other businesses may then begin to use their own designs, which could include multi- colors and patterns, checker board umbrellas, or umbrellas with advertisements of products, etc. ITEM K PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DIRECTOR'S REPORT - RUBIO'S BAJA GRILL December 10, 1997 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission deny the use of corporate-identity palapas umbrellas, and reaffirm City Planner's and Design Review Committee's decision to deny the use of palapas through minute action. Re pes ctf~ Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:taa Attachments: Exhibit "A" Exhibit "B" Exhibit "C" Exhibit "D" Exhibit "E" Site Plan Approved Street Furniture Proposed Palapas Elevations Showing Patio and Palapas Applicant's Letters RCHITECTS ACIF'ICA TO ~RRA VISTA T(:~/N CENTER WIESTERN PROPERTIES SITE PLAN C) FOOTHILL BLVD BUILDING 4-TV"rc I I I I ~d~o' ~~/T I 1019 COL COL SUITE ~ 2235 OF COL ..... 74'-6" TVTC BUILDING #4 5/~/97 ~dT .:L.~ L L AS -------'--T I ~_x3~t~ ~LL SOUTH ELEVATION ~ PROPOSED PALAPAS PER PLAN /' __ PROPOSED k"L:'TAL ~ / PATIO FURNITURE ~ / PER PLAN ~ ~ I I I. FINISHED TO MATCH RAILING TO MATCH . EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING RAILINGS K? ~ r ubio August 27, 1997 RECEIVED OCT 3 0 1997' Ms. Nancy Fong City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City ot Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Re: Patio Proposal Terra Vista Towne Center Rubio's Baja Grill Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Nancy: Thank you for taking the time to speak with me regarding Rubio's signature patio design. I have enclosed for your review a package of information, which includes several photographs of both the interior and exterior of our restaurants. You will note that thatched umbrellas (Palapas) are a prominently displayed on our patios; are part of our logo; and are included in many of our advertising pieces. The Palapa is the signature architectural feature in all of our restaurants. In the interest of teamwork, we are proposing the following patio design which we feel will meet both the City's and Rubio's needs. 1. Rubio's will build a decorative railing surrounding the entire patio. The decorative railing will be "interrupted" with 48" high 18" x 18" CMU pillars with a stucco finish painted to match the building on 10' 6" centers. The intention is to mask the proposed furniture from the street similar to the design at the Macaroni Grill in the same center. ,,4~See enclosed drawing.) 2. Rubio s will install four (4) thatched Palapas. Each Palapa is 8' feet in overall height and cemented into the concrete patio slab. Each Palapa is fire proofed and will have a fire department certifcation. 3. Rubio's will install our standard patio furniture which we feel is more upscale than the current patio furniture in the food court area. Each table and chair is fabricated metal design powder coated to insure that K 5151 Sh*.'cham I'lacc · Suite 2(gl · Sail I)icgo, (2~lih,rlna 92122 /,/..w 019./.152-1771) /it~ >P) q52-01SI Ms Nancy Fong August 27, 1997 Page -2- they do not rust or are easily damaged. I have enclosed some photographs and information on our furniture for your review. Once you have had a chance to review the enclosed information, I am sure you will agree that the proposed design will have a very upscale look and feel. As a high quality quick service restaurant, it is imperative that we present ourselves in an upscale fashion in order to attract our core customers. If you feel the proposed design meets within your guidelines and can be approved, we are prepared to create final architectural documents for your final review and approval. I would be happy to meet with you at any time to discuss any questions or concerns you may have. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, RUBIO'S RESTAURANTS, INC. T eodor~kin II, M.C.R. Director of Real Estate CC: Richard Rubio, Vice President of Real Estate Development Carl Garlick, Construction Manager NOU-04-199~ 17:03 P.01 Lewis Homes Retail 1156 N. Mountain Avenue ! P,0. Box 670 Uphnd. CA 917'86-0670 90~JmLS.-0071 FAX 909FJ49-6740 · ~Sust 1. 1997 Mail/Fax 909-477-2849 Ms. Nancy Fong Senior Planner City of Pancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 Re: Rubio's Patio Furniture Terra V~sta Town Center RECEIVED NOV 0 5 1997 City oi Rancftc Cucamonga Planning Division Dear Ms. F0ng:. Wc have completed the review of the Patio furniture for this tenant and have approved the 30" Plaza Tables and accompanying PI:,-~ Euro Chairs and Palaim style umbr,'llas as submitted to your office by Rubio's Restaurants. Inc., August 27, 1997. We believe this furniture would enhance the appearance of this restaurant in partio~lar, and the overall center in general. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate tn call me at 909-949-6715. Sincerely, LEWIS HOMES MANAGEMENT COKP. Richard Reinhardt Commercial Project Manager G. Hoxworth J. Jasper File/Chron TOTAL P.01