No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/11/17 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. November 17, 1999 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City Councilmembers William J. Alexander, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro Tern Paul Biane, Councilmember James V. Curatalo, Councilmember Bob Dutton, Councilmember Jack Lam, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 477-2700 City Council Agenda November 17, 1999 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander Biane Curatalo , Duttor~ , and ~Villiams__ B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of a Proclamation recognizing November 18, 1999, as "National GIS Day." C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of October 31, 1999. , Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/27/99 and 11/3/99 and Payroll ending 10/24/99 for the total amount of $2,915,476.02. Approval to amend the City's Compensation and Classification Plan by deleting and replacing certain outdated classifications. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of Foothill Boulevard Median Improvements Phase II, Deer Creek Channel Bridge Widening and Storm Drain Project, located from approximately 600 feet west of Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue and Hermosa Avenue north to Church Street, to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-9824 (RE: Also funded by RDA Account No. 15~51000). 15 16 City Council Agenda November 17, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. 99-243 18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II, DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIRDGE WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS o Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the construction of Beryl Street Rehabilitation from Base Line Road to Cielito Street, to be funded from Account No. 32-4637-9518. 22 RESOLUTION NO. 99-244 24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BERYL STREET REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO CIELITO STREET IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to appropriate $45,833.00 and approve Contract Change Order No. 1 for Contract 99-036 for Construction Surveying on the Day Creek Boulevard and the Relocation of Highland Avenue, to be funded from the fund balance of Fund 22 to be placed in Account No. 22-4637-9710. 28 Approval of Map and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for Parcel Map 15282, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of Aspen Avenue, submitted by S & D Rancho Cucamonga, California, LTD. 29 RESOLUTION NO. 99-245 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15282 City Council Agenda November 17, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. 99-246 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15282 Approval of the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Terra Vista Park Improvements related to Tentative Tract 15072, generally located at the southwest corner of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. 35 RESOLUTION NO. 99-247 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PARK SECURITY FOR ALL INTERIOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PARKWAY IMPROVE- MENTS AND SIGNALIZATION, RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15072 Approval to enter into an Access and License Indemnity Agreement (CO 99-102) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cox Communications PCS, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership, for the purpose of allowing Cox Communications and their consultants access to Heritage Park to conduct feasibility tests to determine the feasibility of installing wireless communication facilities. 39 10. Approval to award and authorize the execution of the Contract (CO 99-103) for janitorial services for citywide facilities to Coastal Building Services of Fountain Valley, in the amount of $171,720, to be funded from Fund 01-4648-6036. 40 11. Approval and execution of a Cooperative Agreement (CO 99-104) between the State of California (State), the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (Authority), the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the County of San Bernardino (County) for construction of Segment 5 of State Route 30 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 42 RESOLUTION NO. 99-248 44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (STATE), THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY City Council Agenda November 17, 1999 12. (AUTHORITY), THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA (CITY) AND THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (COUNTY) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SEGMENT 5 OF STATE ROUTE 30 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Approval to accept the Fourth Street Rehabilitation Project, from 370 feet west of Santa Anita Street to 1600 feet east, Contract No. 99- 021 as complete, release the Bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $229,692.05, appropriate $5,772.64 from the fund balance of Fund 10 to be placed in Account No. 10-4637-9707 and approve Contract Change Order No. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 99-249 46 47 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOURTH STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT, FROM 370 FEET WEST OF SANTA ANITA STREET TO 1600 FEET EAST, CONTRACT NO. 99-021 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 13. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance and Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for MDR 97-11, located at 12550 Arrow Route, submitted by Aire Liquide. RESOLUTION NO. 99-250 48 49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 97-11, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 14. 15. Approval to accept a Surety Rider, reducing the Faithful Performance Bond for Tract 15875-1, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. Approval to accept the FY 1998/99 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation-Overlay, various locations, Contract No. 99-041 as complete, release the Bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $246,547.08. 50 51 City Council Agenda November 17, 1999 RESOLUTION NO. 99-251 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE 1998/99 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION- OVERLAY, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 99-041 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 16. Approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for Tract Map 13565-6 and -7, submitted by Standard Pacific Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, located at Twenty-Fourth Street and San Sevaine Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 99-252 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13565-6 AND - 7 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 52 53 54 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non- controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any items can be removed for discussion. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01 - OVERLAND COMPANY - A request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard from Low-Medium Residential (4- 8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 through 04, 1100-071- 01 and 02, and 1100-151-01 and 02. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. City Council Agenda November 17, 1999 ORDINANCE NO. 611 (second reading) 56 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND 1100-151-01 AND 02 , ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to remove approximately 18.5 acres of land from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: GPA 99-05A, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03 - GRIFFIN INDUSTRIES - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for approximately 18.5 acres of land from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-31. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. City Council Agenda November 17, 1999 w ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for two parcels totaling 0.7 acre in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-28 and 34. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, GPA 99-05C, ISPA 99-04, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to remove from the Industrial Area Specific Plan Map, a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and DDA 99-05. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to change the Development District zoning designation for a single parcel approximately 1.6 acres in size from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue - APN: 210-062-10. Related files: GPA 99-05A, ISPA 99-02, DDA 99-03, GPA 99-05B, ISPA 99-03, DDA 99-04, GPA 99-05C, and ISPA 99-04. Staff has prepared a Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ORDINANCE NO. 612 (second reading) 62 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, A REQUEST TO REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 City Council Agenda November 17, 1999 ORDINANCE NO. 613 (second reading) 67 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 ORDINANCE NO. 614 (second reading) 72 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03, A REQUEST TO REMOVE TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 0.7 ACRE FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 ORDINANCE NO. 615 (second reading) 77 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRE IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW- MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 City Council Agenda November 17, 1999 ORDINANCE NO. 616 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 210-062-10 ORDINANCE NO. 617 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 82 87 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. No items submitted. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12.04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LEASH- OPTIONAL AREAS IN PUBLIC PARKS AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE THERETO; AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A LEASH OPTIONAL AREA FOR DOGS WITHIN A CITY-OWNED PARK 92 City Council Agenda November 17, 1999 ORDINANCE NO. 618 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA_AMENDING CHAPTER 12.04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LEASH-OPTIONAL AREAS IN PUBLIC PARKS AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE THERETO RESOLUTION NO. 99-253 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A LEASH OPTIONAL AREA FOR DOGS WITHIN A CITY- OWNED PARK 10 94 98 H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No items submitted. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE A. PARK AND FACILITIES UPDATE 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Central Park Windrows Park Church Street Park Ellena Park Golden Oak Park Lions West Community Center Heritage Community Park Red Hill Community Park Etiwanda Creek Community Park Lot G Facility 101 City Council Agenda November 17, 1999 COMMUNITY SERVICES UPDATE 2. 3. 4. 5. 6~ 7. 8. 9. 10, 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Seniors Youth Activities Teens Youth Sports RC Family Sports Center Adult Spods Trips and Tours Human Services Facilities Community Wide Special Events Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Academy Contract Classes The Grapevine Park and Recreation Commission Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Volunteers 11 102 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the city Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT MEETING TO ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPERTY NEGOTIATIONS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT ROCHESTSER, BETWEEN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARROW ROUTE; JACK LAM, CITY MANAGER, AND KEVEN MCARDLE, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR, NEGOTIATING PARTIES, REGARDING TERMS OF PAYMENT. I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 10, 1999, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council on November 17, 1999 To Whom It May Concern: Several neighbors and I are taking the initiative to open a dialogue with you as the SAN BAG representative. We have taken some time to discuss this matter and believe that there is room for an alternative solution to the issue of closing Highland Avenue two years before the completion of the freeway. We did not became aware of this matter until we received the Segment 4 Construction Advisory dated 11/10/1999 which indicates that from 11/15/1999 forward, Highland Avenue and other streets will be permanently closed. Why was there never any mention of this in any of the updates sent prior to the 11/10/1999 Advisory? Instead of a little over a mile and a half walk to get to school, mainly on side streets that are not very busy, my daughter and other children living in our neighborhood will now have to walk four miles on very busy main city thoroughfares to get to Rancho Cucamonga High School and back. Not only is this inconvenient, but we believe this action by SAN BAG has placed the children in harms way. Did SAN BAG not give any consideration to the health, safety and welfare of these children? What does SAN BAG plan to do to help mitigate this problem? What about the children that go to Victoria Groves Elementary? Now they will have to travel three or four times the distance over busy city streets to go to the same school? Was any thought given to this before the decision to close Highland was finalized? Did SAN BAG give notice to the city of Rancho Cucamonga that this closure was going to occur approximately two years before the completion of the freeway? Did SAN BAG ever recommend to the Rancho Cucamonga mayor or city council to begin considering extending, across Deer Creek, a street such as Victoria Park Lane to help mitigate this problem? Has SAN BAG notified the Chaffey Unified High School District or the Alta Loma School District that this closure is going to happen? Has SAN BAG done anything to facilitate this matter with the people most impacted by this closure? An example of the short notice provided by SAN BAG is the Segment 4 Construction Advisory which is dated 11/10/1999 but not received by us until Saturday 11/13/1999, two days before the closure and on a weekend making it impossible to contact anyone in SAN BAG prior to the closure. There was no mention of the closure in the SANBAG published Route 30 update for October, and only an invitation to come to a meeting on 11/2/1999 with no agenda indicating the topics to be discussed. Even if an agenda had been provided, there was insufficient time for us to respond to SANBAG's intent to close Highland. Based on this lack of consideration for the public, what recourse does that leave for the average citizen? About a year ago, when I first found out that the plan called for the closure of Highland, I specifically asked SANBAG representatives when this would occur. I was told by several different representatives (I think a man named Moon?) and another person, both of whom told me that this closure would not happen until the freeway was completed. They also told me that there would be accommodations for pedestrians between where 19th currently cuts in to Highland and Milliken. If something changed over the past year, why was this community not notified sooner? We are submitting this informal document as a first step in an attempt to achieve recourse. I am looking forward to receiving an early response from you or your superiors. Thank you, Jerry Jacobson 10935 Santa Barbara Place Alta Loma, CA 91701 Home Phone: (909) 980-8600 Work Phone: (909) 394-6506 Dion & Kara Graven 10934 Santa Barbara Place Alta Loma, CA 91701 Ryan Peterson 10975 Santa Barbara Place Alta Loma, CA 91701 Tony & Morgan Pellettera 10974 Santa Barbara Place Alta Loma, CA 91701 Robert & Charlotte Lelle 10965 Santa Barbara Place Alta Loma, CA 91701 Submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council on November 17, 1999 Mr. Gillespie, My name is Jerry Jacobson and I live in Rancho Cucamonga. I drafted the e-mail below for myself and four of my neighbors and sent it to SANBAG. I am sending a copy to you, because we believe that as the engineer in charge of the freeway project, some of our questions can or should be responded to by you. To say that the unannounced and sudden closure of this portion of Highland Avenue and some of the surrounding streets has taken us all by surprise, would be an understatement. In addition to the inconvenience, the impact to families that send their children to schools east of Deer Creek is onerous. I only spent a short time yesterday speaking with my neighbors about this matter, and one for one, they indicated that they would support any effort to achieve some recourse. A quote by Joe O'Neal in an article in the Daily Bulletin on Friday 11/12/1999 indicates that some people living south of Highland and between Deer Creek and Milliken requested that Highland remain permanently closed. Several questions come up when reading this statement. 1. Where is this "Deer Creek" as in "between Deer Creek and Milliken? 2. If my guess is correct, Mr. O'Neil is referring to the Deer Creek run off channel just east of the Windsong tract where I live. 3. Who are these "people" referred to in the article? No one in my neighborhood that I spoke with made a request to permanently close Highland. If a survey were to be done, I bet it would show that very few, if any, "people" requested this. 4. If the "people" in the Windsong tract request that Highland not be permanently closed, will you or Mr. O'Neil comply with our request? 5. What are the criteria for making this type of request? A preponderance of "people", or perhaps it is based on demographics, or is the criteria more monetary in nature? 6. When did Rancho Cucamonga lose its governing body? Am I to understand that the mayor and city council do not have to rule on these types of changes? 7. Does Mr. O'Neil really have this much authority? 8. I understand that the city is planning on making Banyon or Wilson into a four lane road out to the new Day Creek Blvd. Have the people in that area requested this or will this also be a surprise? I know that you may not like the way I phrased question 5 but I am appalled that a man of Mr. O'Neil's stature would make such a ridiculous statement. If nothing else, the statement shows the contempt he holds for the constituents of this fine city. I am only attempting to gather information to determine what recourse my neighbors and I have regarding being heard about this issue. My intention is to handle this very serious and important matter as amicably as possible. I hope we will all be able to agree on that and come to a solution that is a win-win for both the city and the constituents victimized by this decision. I would very much appreciate a timely response to my issues and concerns both above and in the attached e-mail. Thank you, Jerry Jacobson Deer Creek Levee Standard A. B. C. Project Flood Drainage Map 1960's Corps hydrology map 1972 NOAA Map for 100 Year Storm II, Expert Declarations A. Wi!liams B. Collins C. Bruington D. Sheenan Eo Henvey F. Goodridge G. Campbell III. Debris Production/Residual Risk A. Debris Inflow Curve B. S.B. County Flood Control Calculations C. Burn risk studies Location Deer Demens Hillside Location Deer Demens Hillside TABLE III-1 Debris production Factors 3 Hour Drainage Drainage Area Slope Density Hypsometric Rainfall (in) (sq mi) (ft/mi) (mi/sq mi) Index 3.71 1200 2.8 .43 3.27 2.35 1150 3.4 .35 3.30 0.70 1170 3.6 .31 3.30 Debris production (cu yds/sq mi) Correction Factors (in %) Slope Drainage Density Hypsometric Index 3 Hour Rainfall 185000 96 91 94 86 200000 95 84 77 88 230000 95 78 58 89 Estimated Volume (ac-ft) 310 40 ~rZ'r-3 STANDARD PROJECT FLOOD .S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS FAI,l~NA ~J. tV CL&REMONT ~a. le VICINITY MAP I · I ;O II MILM LEGEND BOUNDARY OF DRAINAlE AREA BOUNDARY OF DRAINAGE SUBAREA t ~ ~ O I ~ -SCALE DRrUM IS MEAN 8'EA LEVEL SANTA ANA RIVER iASlN,CALIFORNIA REVIEW REPORT FOR FLOOD CONTROL CUCAMONGA CREEK CONSID[R!~ CHANNEL CONSIDERED LEVEE CONSIDERED DEBRIS BASIN POINT OF CO~CENTRATION LINE OF EQUAL/3-YEAR NEAN SEASONAL pRECIPrrA-- TION IN INCHEStlB?O pRECIPITATION STATION AND NUMBER (.RECORDING } pRECIPffATION STATION AND NUMBER (NONRECORDING} P RE CIPITATIO N STATION AND NUMBER (NONRECORDING~ DISCONTI N UED ) STREAM GAGING STARON AND NUMBER (RECORDING} SE:E pLATE IT MILES HyDROLOGIC MAP FILE U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT LOS ANGELES CORPS OF ENGINEERS TO ACCOMPANY REPORT DATED; NO. ApPENDiX I PLATE · I (::) . LEGEND ..... ' ' "~ AREA ' '|l "' BOUNDARY OF DRAINAGE · T._ i::~~ : SUBAREA ...... ;' em:::a~REI:X:XaaENDED CHANNEL '" ........ "':' 44--I- RECOM~NDED t.S'V~E ..... ' "~-r~ t~ CONSIDERED DEems 114__ :.' BASIN  )4°05'' --JT--UNE OF EQUAL I00- '*' YEAR MEAN SEASONAL : ' PRECI PITA'TiON IN INCFES "'Q? PRECIPITATION STATION ~ t~) PREX:IPITATION STATION "'"' , AND NUMBERCN~ "' ING) !. _,~.., 9/PRECIPITATION STATION AND -~NUMBER(NONRECO~OING, DISCONTI NU ED) · STREAM GAGING STATION (RECORDING) 0 SCALE b---.,,,i I · ')(' SEE PLATE I Z 3 I I I MILES DATUM IS M'~AN SEA LEVEL SANTA ANA lINER IASIN, CAL|FORNIA (:UCAMONGA CREEK, SAN BImRNARDFNO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES HYDROLOGIC MAP U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT ~ ~,.., LOS ANGELES, CORPS OF ENGINEERS '~ TO ACCOMPANY REPORT DATED:MARCH 197'3 FILE NO. 224/'26 PLATE I 3 3 25 '25\,_ Figure 43 ~)~AN INCH NOAA ATLAS 2, Volun~ XI Prepared by U.S, Depa~ment of Commerce National Oceanic and At~nospheric Administration National Weather Servi,i:e, Office of Hydrology Prepared for U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Servi~e Engineering Division ]20 60/ I '35 L EXPERT DECLARATIONS Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3:31PM;]etFax #985;Page 2 DECLARATION OF DAVID T. WILLIAMS Mr, J42(f431.P02 161112407 08120/97 NIg4;stl 1. I am the president of WEST Consultants, Inc., a San Diego based water resources engineering firm. I received a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Davis, and an M.S. in Environmental Civil Engineering at the same university. I also received a Ph.D. in Hydraulics and Sedimentation from Colorado State UniverSity. I am a fellow o~ the American Society of Civil Engineers, an~adjunct professor at San Diego State University in the Civil Engineering Department, a certified Professional Hydrologisn, a Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC), and a California registered pro~essional Civil Engineer. I have over 25 years of experience in wa=er resources, with a specialty in ~lood hazard evaluation. I currently supervise over 20 engineers who conduct flood related studies for the ArmyiCorps o~ EngineerS, California Department of Transportation, and Federal Emergency Management Agency. I am familiar with the Corps of Engineers' procedures as I was employed by the,Corp for approximately 15 years. I am also f~_liar with FEMA regulations and, in fact, I teach FEMA remapping procedures as part of a course on hydraulics engineering for the American Society of Civil Engineers. Attached as Exhibit A is a copy of my curric~lumvitae. Because I am teaching such a FEMA course in Portland, Oregon, I am not available to testify at the Rancho Cucamonga City council hearing scheduled for AUgust 20, 1997. I have personal knowledge of the statements made.heroin and, if Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03199 3:31PM;]etF"ax #985;Page 3/19 2. This declaration is made in support of Cucamongans United for Reasonable Expansion (.CUEE") challenge to the Lauren Development Project. I have ha~ the opportua=i~y to personally evaluate the Deer Creek Debris Basin and the p=operty between the Debris Basin and the levee. I also have walked the levee. I have reviewed documents and understand that the proposed residential development by Lauren Development involve~ removal of an approximately 48' high and over 2,080 foot long, levee and multiple swale system built in the 1950s. This levee and swale system has effectively served to hold back water and debris flow from downslope structures, including water and.debris flow d~ring =he 1969 floods. The effectivenoes of the levee can be seen on aerial and topographic maps already submitted in the record. 3. In my professional opinion, I have concluded that removal of the levee and swale ~ystem (and the'construction uf a residential development) will place both the new residents and the existing residents downslope of the levee in substantially greater risk of flooding and debri~ flow than currently exists notwithstanding the existence of the Deer Creek Debris Basin upslope. I base this conclusion on the following ~actors. HC3q;44~l.PO~ 16,.'1112~07 08/20/97 RHN:etl (a) The Debris Basin wa~ designed to withstand a 5.0 magnitude earthquake. Attached are excerp~ from the Army Corps' design memoranda for the Debris Basin. mSubsequent studies conducted by the Southern California Earthquake Center ("SCEC") Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3:32PM;]etFax #985;Page 4/19 realistically produce a 7.0 or greater magnitude earthquake. I have reviewed the declaration of Dr. Thomas Benyey, Ph.D, Director of the SCEC and this declaration has been submitted in the record for your cunmideraCion. (b) The volume capacity of the. Debris Basin was based upon the Tatumme=hod developed in 1963 by the Los Angeles A~y Corps of Engineers. The Corps published updated criterion for Debris Basin design in 1992 which could significantly change the design volume. Based upon my own personal~observations and these new standards, the Debris Basin appears ~o be undersized. This is another post-1990 changed circumstance!that must be considered. HCH24z,]1.P02 163112407 {c) In 1994, WEST Consultants performed a study of the Barrow Debris Basin in the City of Glendora, County of Los Angeles. I was direcnly involved in that proj6cU. The Barrow basin overtopped during the 1969 flood, which at this location was a ten year precipitation even~ approximatel~ one year after a b~rn. Although the available volume of the Debris' Basin was adequate, computations showed that the "runup"~of ~he debris due to momen=uxn was approximately ten feet, causing the debris to go over the spillway b~ four feet which, in turn, ~plugged the downs=ream concrete channel resulting in overtqpping of the Debris Basin and substantial damage to downstream property. The Deer creek Debris Sasin has similar watershed basin slope characteristic of the Harrow Debris Basin. Th~ spillway crest is 3 Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3:32PM;]etFax #985;Page 5/19 cleanup, according to =he plans) is at approximately 2845. About 25% of the volume from small events is allowed-to fill before clean out is required. This would allow the manerial to fill up to about elevation 2850. If an event sim/lar co the Harrow Debris Basin event occurred, the debris would go over!the spillway by three feet. The downstream channel w~s designed based upon "clear" water and debris in the water would significantly decrease the capacity and spill over or cause it to plug up cornpie=elV also causing it to spill over. 16111~0F 08/20/97 MHM;S~I (d) In the 1950s, the local ~lOod control agency constructed a series of swales and levees designed to slow the debris flows and ccnve~ them to a controlled outlet point. The flood of 1969 caused a debris torrent which was largely controlled by the levees and swales. The levee and swale system protected the area.and the homes dowllslope o~ the levee. The developer intends to remove this levee and use~the spoil to fill in the swales. Although ~he levee and swales were built before the construction of the Debris Basin, the Arm~=Corps considered them aB an integral par~ of the project and recommended that material that would accumulate in ~he Debri~ Basin actually be used to fortify =he levee. Removal of ~he swales and levee8 would weaken the protective nature of the Corp~ Debris Basin project. I also understand that the developer ]claims tha~ the levee is no longer effective because o~ a approximately 200 breach aU the top of Paddock Road. This is a small fraction of the overall levee and can easily be repaired and has minimal Sent by: LOEB &LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3:32PM;]etFax #985;Page 6/19 and the swale system to provide secondary protection to the aowaslope residents. (e) Tom Sheahan, a registered geologist, certified hydrogeologiet. and principal of Dames & Moore, has identified two potential landslide areas exceeding 100 acres that are adjacent to the Deer Creek Debris Basin spillway. If these elides become active, they would bypass the Debris Basin and go ~nhindered to downslope areas that currently are protected by the levee and swale system. This would be Darticuiarly dangerous for the proposed new homes to be built on the 8ameilocation as the levee and swales once the levee is destroyed and is equally dangerous to existing homes. 4. The seriousness of this matter should not be t~nored by the City. The damage to l~fe and p~operty in the event of~a debris flow is serious. Given the ~hanged circumstanoes described above {earthquake magnitudes and new debris basin design criteria), the City must require further study and mitigation measurerB prior to placin~ its citizens at ri~k. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is signed at Portland, Oregon on August 20, 1997. David T.. Willlame Nc-N24651.P02 16311260? 08t20197 HNN:gT1 5 Pane ~/O Job 963 Atlg.20 Wed 05:5~ and the craze myeLem to Provide mec , .. downelope reek . ondary Pror-ect~on to ) T~ ~heahan, a r~etercd ~o~og~lt, bY~e°l~lsL, ~d Principal. o~ Da~s & Moors. has idenC~i ~ ~tentjal laNsl~de areas exceedi ed adjacent ~o ~he~ n9 100 acres ~t mrs .' ,...--:,- ,..'; Z'j' """ "';"". "r""' '~red to d~al' ~aee the ~br~e Baozn and go & s ~Tjy ~rrently are Protected the pr~eef:ws~s~' ~is ~uld ~ Particularly dangenus t ~ the sa~ location ae tho eves ~ ewelee once the le~ ~s destroyed and i.s ~ all 15 IS 5. the seriousness of ~.h/s Ni;Lez. should not be Xgnorsd by the City. ~e da~e to life and P~oporCy ~n ~he event of a 17 d~rts tl~ i.s serl~s. O~ven t~ c~nged c~c~Cance8 ~8 descried s~e [ea~ke m~t~es and new debris ~stn 20 ~s~ criter~e}, ~he C~cy ~st re~ire tu~her sr. udy And mi c fgdtlon 2~ measurere Prior ~o 91acin~ tEs ci~lzsns at risk. I declare ~er ~nslty o~ ~rit:~ ~hat the ~oregolng 32 is C~ a~ cor~cC aN ~t ~s ~clara~inn ts sig~ed ~ 23 Portland, Oregon en Au~ec 20, lSST. 24 27 David T. WilZlmms 28 ImM~3S.NM. el~M/W ilm: jell 0~/i5/'i?~8 21;13 213-688-3927 LOEB & LU~ wuK~ r~.~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF DAVID T. WILLIAMS, PH.D., P.E. 1. I am the president of WEST Consultants, inc.. a San Diego based water resources engineering firm. I received a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of California, Davis. and an M.S. in Environmental Civil Engineering at the same university. I also received a Ph.D. in Hydraulics and Sedirnentatlon from Colorado State University. I am a fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers, an adjunct professor at San Diego State University in the Civil Engineering Department, a certffied Professional Hydrologist, a Certified professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (C.p:,ESC), and a California registered professional Civil Engineer. I have over 25~'~ears of experience in water resources, with a specialty in flood hazard evaluation. I currently supervise over 20 engineers who conduct flood related studies for the Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Transportation, and Federal Emergency Management Agency. I am familiar with the Corps of Engineers' procedures as I was employed by the Corps for approximStelY 15 years. I am also familiar with FEMA regulations as i teach FEMA remapping procedures as part of a course on hydraulics engineering for the American Society of Civil Engineers. I authored the Reservoir Sedimentation Chapter in the U,S. Corps of Engineers Manual on Sedimentation investigation and the HEC-6 user's manual for the Army Corps Hydrologlc Engineedncj Center. I previously submitted e declaration to the City of Rancho Cucamonga on August 20. 1997, concluding that new information not available to the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles (ACOE) at the time the Deer Creek Debris Basin ("Debris Basin") was constructed necessitates e serious safety review before the secondarY containment levee is 28 5 S9/'15/1998 21:13 213-688-3927 LOEB 1 removed. This new information included the existence of landslide areas above the 2 Debris Basin channel that were net identified or addressed by the ACOE at the time 3 of the Dabfie Basin Construction. Further, the magnitude of the Cucamonga Fault. 4 which runs virtually beneath the Debris Basin and directly under the channel, is 5 significantly higher than the ACOE's projections when The Debris Basin wile designed. 6 I base these conclusions upon my review of the original Design Memorandum 7 8 developed by the ACOE in connection with the Debris Basin, which is too voluminous 9 to attach and which is available to your staff. The statements made in my original 10 declaration are incorporated by reference. 11 2. This declaration is made in support of Cucamongans United for 12 Reasonable Expansion (CURE) challenge to the Lauren Development Project. I have 13 personally visited the Debris Basin, the adjacent levee, and the property down slope '14 15 of the Debris Basin. Based upon my significant experience with hydraulics and 16 sediment transport, which spans over 25 years, I have concluded that removal of the 17 existing secondary levee and construction of homes in its location places future and 18 existing home owners in danger. Therefore. I urge the City Council to hire qualified 19 Debris Basin experts to thoroughly evaluate the vulnerability of the Debris Basin prior 20 to approving the Project. 21 3. The volume capacity of the Debris Basin for the design event was 22 23 I:msed upon the .Taturn Method, which was developed in 1963 by the U.S. Army 24 Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles. Subsecluent to the construction of the Debris 25 Basin, the ACOE updated the Method and released the publication entitled "Los 26 Angeles District Method for Prediction of Debris Yield," in February 1992 (revised in 27 28 6 ~9/15/1998 21:13 213-688-3927 LOEB & Lu~ ~,-,',~' .... 19' 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I August 1992) a copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A". Since the 1963 publicaljon, 2 23 years of additional flood information (and resulting debris production) was 3 c.,ollected and used to update the coefficients of the debris production equations in the 4 1992 publications. Significant floods have occurred since 1963 which provide 5 important information; in padicular, the floods of November 1965. January 1969, and 6 February 1978. In statistical analysis. when large events occur, the information 7 8 gathered is used to update a frequency study, i.e., the relationship of how frequent a 9 certain phenomenon such as debris discharge occurs, as the information can change 10 drastically. For example. suppose a 50 year flood event produces 10.000 cubic yards 11 of debds using frequency analysis based upon measurements evaliable prior to 1963, 12 Subsequently, three signfficant flood events occurred with the resulting debris 13 production measured and used to update the frequency relationshiP. Using the 14 15 updated frequency relationship, the 10.000 cubic yards of debris would now be 16 related to a more frequent event, for example, a 20 year flood event. in turn. the 17 debds production of a 50 year flood event would be higher than the original 10,000 18 cubic yards. Based on the new information and statistical analysis, the debris basin no longer provides the original design level of protection; in actuality, there is a greater dsk than originally anticipated, When the volume capacity is exceeded during a flood event. the debris torrent goes up and over the basin spillway and can overtop and tax the embankments that are on each side of the spillway. Since the channel downstream of the spillway is designed for "clear" water, this debris torrent can easily overwhelm the channel. overflow into the adjacent area, and subsequently damage the property and endanger the lives of the people down slope of the debris basin. 28 3 7 ------"""" LFJI:.[~ & uuc. p ,,-,-w ....... ~/15/i9e8 21: 1s 213-688-3927 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. The above phenomenor~ occurred at many locations in the San Gabriel Mountain Range in 1969. The Deer Creek Oebds Basin similarly is located in the San Gabriel MOuntains. To protect down slope and future homeowners in Rancho Cur.,amonge, a qualified engineer with IPebds Basin experience must re- compute the design capacity based upon the updated information and check it against the aGtual capacity of the Debris Basin just before maintenance excavation is performed. This analysis has not been conducted by the ACOE, the San Bernardino County Rood Control District, FEMA. the City Engineer. nor Lauren Oevelopment's consultants. Without such an analysis, the City is placing its families in the same position as those who were caught in Debris Flow down slope of other San Gabriel Mountain Basins that failed. 5. Another phenomenon for which the Debris Basin was not designed is what is termed as "run up" over the spillway, Because of the steepnose of Cucamonga Peak, the area just upstream of the Debris Basin, a debris torrent 'entering the Debds Basin will have extremely high velocities. Even If the Debris Basin has adequate volume capacity, which is seriousiy in question, the debris torrent, by virtue of its high velocity. can have enough momentum to "run up" the approach slope of the spillway and overtop it. As a result of the property damage and loss of life in 1965, 1969 and 1978, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works requked an analysis of "run up" for one of their Debris Basins before permitting development of the area down slope of the basin. 'Attached as Exhibit "B" is a copy of the American Society of Engineers (ASCE) paper entitled "Overtopping Prevention of the Harrow Debris Basin in Los Angeles County," presented at the ASCE Water Resources Engineering 98 conference, which documents the analysis. 8 LOf..t5 ~! uuc= v,~,-,.,- .... 21; 13 213-~,88-3927 In this paper, the Harrow Debris Basin was deemed to have adequate volume 2 capacity (50 year design flood) when a 10 year flood event caused the basin to 3 overtop by a combination of debris volume loss and "run up" phenomenon. This 4 overtopping caused the downstream channel to "plug up" and spill onto the adjacent 5 land, causing damage to the property down slope of the debris basin. The Harrow 6 Debris Basin is uncomfortably similar to the Deer Creek Debris Basin since it is along 7 8 the same side of the San Gabriel Mountain Range. The similarities are supported by 9 the fact that the 1992 ACOE debds method showed high correlation between debris 10 yield and watershed parameters when analyzing the area that encompasses both 11 Deer Creek and Harrow Oebds Basins. Such an analysis has not been performed by t 2 the ACOE, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District, FEMA, the City 13 Engineer nor Lauren Development's consultants. Evaluating the "run up" capacity of 14 15 the Deer Creek Debris Basin is a critical step that must be undertaken by the City 16 prior to placing its residents at risk by approving the Lauren Development project. 17 6. In light of the previously mentioned concerns, a complete safety 18 and impa~ Study should be performed on the Deer Creek Debris Basin, its 19 downstream channel, and potential effects of the down slope areas. This study is 20 recommended due to the seriousness of the potential damage to life and property. I 21 should also emphasize that the perimeter levee proposed to be removed was rated 22 23 by FEMA to a 100 year flood event in 1983. Attached is correspondence from FEMA 24 to the Mayor of Rancho Cucamonga dated September 4, 1997, confirming this fact. I 25 previously testified that the small breech in the levee can be easily repaired and does 26 not detract from FEMA's rating. An earthen levee can be easily maintained. 27 28 5 9 S = I 6Pf4 FROhi WEST CONSULTANTS P~GE 81 17:47 213-~88-3127 t,OE~ 7. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and 2 con'e~ and thet the declaration ts signed st San Diego, C, alifomm on September 13, 3 1998. !hcaule of the short notice provided in connection with the September 4 19~8 meeting, I cannol attend the meeting ~ I am performing studies for the 5 University dr Wisconsin; however, I would be wilting to speak with any of the CRy 6 'Council Members, thek counsel. or Lauren Development, its counsel and consultants 7 6 to disr, um~ lh~ serious issues further- The con~quences of the City failing to g conduct the above studies are serious and these rt, r, ormnendations shouM not be lO ignored- I pemonld|y would not consider living in me homes being r, onstructed or the 11 existing homes given my Msessment of the dangers. 12 . 14 t~,:David T. Wllllan"m, Ph.D, I~.E ' 15. 16 17 lg 2O 21 23 26 28 6 10 Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3:58PM;]etFax #993;Page 1/4 Nc/4;~ze175.p12 15191);~40~ 06/11/97 MHll:tsl DECLARATION OF BRUCE COLLINS' I, Bruce Collins, declare and state as follows: 1. I am a Senior Engineer at Dames .& Moore, one of the largest geotechnical firms in the world. I have a Bachelor of Sciences Degree in Civil Engineering and graduate studies in hydrotogy from the University of California and waste water treatment from Oklahoma State University. In my over 35 years as an engineer I have had extensive experience on flood control and drainage issues. I was project hydrologist and facilities design engineer for developing a comprehensive master plan for flood control and storm drainage for metropolitan Reno. Also, I was project manager of the Major Urban Studies Plan for Metropolitan Spokane Water Resources and Flood Control, Seattle District, Army Corps of Engineers. The statements made herei~ are in support cf the opposition of Cucamongans United for Reasonable Expansion ("CURE") to the Lauren Development Project. The statements made are of my own personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, I would and could testify to the truth thereof. 2. On June 10, 1997, I performed a site inspection and evaluation of the Deer Creek alluvial fan [erimeter drainage containment levee. Lauren Development is proposing to remove a substantial section of the drainage swale and embankment which now provides a protective barrier for flood waters and drainage originating across the broad alluvial fan of Deer Creek after it leaves the point where Deer Canyon comes out of= the mountains. These changes would alter the level of flood control protection offered to II~'v~n Vi~w/RC-V Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3:59PM;]etrax #993;Page 2/4 KN2~175,P12 151~02~08 0~t11/97 NHN:~sl The Perimeter Swale and Levee.Are Still valuable Flood Protection St. ructures. 3. I~ has been presumed by Lauren Developmen~ That the construction of the Deer Creek Debris Basin'and doncreTe channel has rendered the perimeter containment swale and embankment obsolete, thus rendering its removallas no consequence to local drainage. This presumption fails to recognize the benefit of this perimeter containment drainage structure which is supplementary to the Deer Creek Basin that serves to concentrate the surface water flow of Deer Creek and direct:it into a Concrete channel. p~sp~e._the Deer Creek Basin~, home owner~ and ~de~s O~ .~b~..Q~he~ side of the swale and levee would be siqnificantlv less safe if the levee is to be b~eached and if the drainage swale is filled in. · The Perimeter Swale and Levee PrOV~de!$~condary Flood and Drainage Containment. 4. In assessing the value and benefits Zo the residents of RC-V/Maven View Estates provided by the perimeter swale and levee, it should be recognized that the Deer Creek Debris Basin only collects and directs surface water into the concrete drainage channel and that there is a substantial quantity of subsurface flow through the alluvial fan and surface drainage originating below the basin now being intercepted by the perimeter swale and levee. An inspection of the Deer Canyon debris dam site and adjacent area indicates ~hat the debris dam has no signiEicant storage capacity -- a maximum depth of the retention basin being a depth of 15-18 feet at the low flow intake strutcure. The spillway disctlar~es to a. lined concrete 2 Sent by: LOEB &LOEB 213 688 3460j 11/03/99 3:59PMjJetl~ax #993jPage 3/4 rectangular channel which conveys flow down across the alluvial fan which spreads across the Deer Creek-Day Creek break in slope as these waterways come out of the steeper mountainous terrain above. Addinionally, approximately 200 acres of land below the debris basin are tributary no the perimeter ditch and levee. ~ spoke to Mr. Ray Lenaburg of FEMA's San FrancisCo office. The PEMA Zoning is now dependent on the levee's existence. Mr. Lenaburg states that the developer would ha~e ~o prove tkat the perimeter swale/levee is no longer essential1 to providing the 100-year flood level of protection. This proof. would have to include the complex hydrologic evaluation of surface water runoff non intercepted by the debris basin and the potential for artesian resurfacing of flow through the alluvial fan. · Seismic Vulnerability Should Be ~ecocmi~ed. 5. In addition, the existing levee and perimeter swale provide an even more significant benefit ~as a "last diEch" containment barrier in the event of potential failure of the Deer Creek Debris Basin and surface flow interception structure due to damage from an earthquake. In this regard, it ishould be clearly recognized that virtually all structures in SoUthern California are subject to earthquake damage vulnerability,i but that in particular there has been recent redelination o.f a significant fault line in very close proximity ~o the debris basin, This higher level of seismic risk may not have been .considered and is a factor that must be evaluated now, in light of more detailed data from recent seismic studies in this area. McH;~6175 ,P12 151902408 06tl 1197 MHM: Is1 Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3:59PMjJtlfa2[_#993jPage 4/4 For the above significant drainage and seismic reasons, retention of the perimeter swale/levee is of very significant benefit to the adjacent downhill residents. The Deer Canyon Basin does not function as a flood retention reservoir as there is very little storage capacity in the basin. Its primary function is to collect surface water at the mouth of Deer Canyon and collect it into a concrete channel which conveys this flow down to the larger tributaries in the valley and ultimately into the Santa Ana River. 6. In conclusion, iE is the opinion~ of Dames & Moore =hat the very significant benefit of the existing perimeter swale and levee should be recognized and be given serious consideration relative Co ~he permitting of development of land which migh~ seriously diminish the safety value of this "last ditch" of protection to downstream residents. The proposed substitution for the perimeter swale and levee by the construction of a ditch as per Amended Tentative Map Section "A-A" is not an adequate substitution or mitigation measure. It is our opinion that this facility should be protected from breach, filling or inadequate replacement. I declare under penalty of perjury ~haC the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration ~as executed Santa Ana, California on June 11, 1997. Bruce COllins MCM2~lrS.P12 151;}024138 06/11/97 NHN:tal · 9347 . Job 383 Juq-11 Wed t5:03 1997 I For the above mLgnl~Actnc drainmge and seismic 2 r-csnuion o[ She mezlme~er fvlle/levee As o[ very .toniflc-n: ~ 3 benefit to t~djacenfdowr~,ll rm-iAen~m. · The Deer Canybn Sas~n does not ~unc~ion ms · :food 5 re~en~Aon reme~ir am ~here is very IA~le m~orage capacity An ~ ~he ~sin. X~e prima~ ~c~ion is C~ collect surface wcer au 4 7 ~he ~u~ o~ Deer Can~on ~ collec~ iu in~o a concreue channel · ~hich conyere ~hie ~low d~n us Uhe la~er u:Ab~aries ~n 9 vall~ and ul~imauely in~o ~he Sandals ~Aver. 10 ~. In c~c]uaion. i~ ie ~he ~pinion o~ Da~s & Moore 11 ~hat the ver~Jsignifi~nt benefit off ~hs existing perzmet:e:' seals 12 and levee should be re,~;Eised and be given serious consideration 13 relative to ~he permi~ o~ development o~ land which mighU *'~"-4 .mmrioueXy diminish 'L'tlqlI, h~-z -I'm-M,,- ,.m{ ~I,AF"2WS~ d~.,..,..l'~'* ,.,{~ · IS pro~eetien to dounstream rsmiden~s. The proposed 1t 16 ~cr ~he perime~ mwale and levee by ~he conseruction 1~ ditch as per Ascended Tentative Map ge~ion "A-A" Am no~ an 18 adeq~..a~e suJms~l~u~ion or mitigation meaEure. Xu is our 0p~n~on 19 ~hat this ~acili~y should be pro~,e~ ~:om breach, ZillAn~ or 20 inadequate replacement. 21 ~ declare under penslUr o~ ~pmrjury ~·% %he 22 is ~rum and correct and :ha~ ~him declare%ion was executed 36 Arm, California on June 11, 1~7, Bruce Cola ins 2~ 38 I(C,illV TqJ .Pla 0i/11197 flefl : tt l 4 ARTHUR BRUINGTON 14 Sunlight Irvine, California 92612 (949) 854-9553 April 2, 1999 Mr. David Freeman Department of Water & Power 111 North Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90017 Dear Mr. Freeman: I am writing on behalf of the homeowners who oppose the removal of a 40-foot high, 2000-foot long levee along Deer Creek in Rancho Cucamonga. For approximately 30 years, I worked at the Los Angeles County Flood Control District where I ultimately was the ChiefEngineer where I served in that capacity from 1970 to I979. For about 16 years of that time, I held policy-making jobs in the flood control and sediment control arenas of the organization. I have a civil engineering background with Bachelor and Master's Degrees from Caltech. At one time, I believed that the existence of a debris basin was enough to protect people. Unfortunately, I witnessed firsthand what happens to debris basins in Los Angeles County when there is a significant fire-flood sequence, and the severe damage to life and property which results. Based upon my experience, I know that debris basins can be overwhelmed, and therefore believe additional downslope protection is needed. The existing 40' high levee at Deer Creek provides that additional protection. Since the Deer Creek Debris Basin was designed by the Army Corps of Engineers in the late 1960s, more severe sediment flow events have occurred than the basin was designed to handle. I am personally familiar with the severe sediment overflows which occurred twice in 1969, and again in 1978 in the northerly reaches of the San Femando Valley in Los Angeles County. The terrain, vegetative cover, and meteorological factors there are similar to those affecting the mountains containing Deer Canyon. Up to then, Mr. David Freeman Department of Water & Power April 2, 1999, Page two the design of debris basins in Los Angeles County was based upon standards similar to those used for Deer Canyon. In the Fall of 1977, several watersheds in the mountains surrounding San Fernundo Valley had completely burned. In February, 1978, after moderate rainfall had occurred for more than twenty-four hours, terminating with short period (5- to 30-minute) intensities having a 25- to 50-year recurrence interval, very severe sediment flows exited from the burned watersheds. In one case, the amount of sediment was estimated to have exceeded the capacity of the debris basin by 50%. In two cases, development had been allowed to occur downstream of the basin in a manner which relied entirely upon the adequacy of the facility. The damage to homes and infrastructure from overflowing sediment was extensive. Many homes were damaged beyond repair. Based upon this experience, I concluded that the design of development downstream of a debris basin must include a protected facility to handle sediment overflow that will occur in severe events beyond the design capacity of the facility. As a matter of public policy, I believe that such secondary containment for development downstream of debris basins is absolutely necessary. The alluvial cone feature so evident at the foot of every canyon emanating from the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains, including Deer Canyon, is startling proof that massive fire-flood sequences have happened in the past, and there is no reason to expect that they will not continue to occur in the future. The existing levee serves the purpose of collecting sediment/debris overflow now on the westerly side of the Deer Canyon Channel in the reach below the debris basin. If all or a portion of the levee and swales are removed for any reason, it must be replaced with an adequate facility serving the same purpose. The 3' x 6' trapezoidal channel that the developer proposes to partially build on property controlled by the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power is not intended to capture debris and is not such a structure. Since the Department would be allowing the developer to remove portions of the levee and fill in the swales on its property, the Department could expose itself, and the City of LOs Angeles, to significant liability when a debris overflow occurs. Because debris flows do not happen on a regular basis, many people are not familiar with just how devastating they can be. i 45243_ 1. dec Page 3 Mr. David Freeman I)epa,,lment ~jf Water & Pc>war Apri I 3, I Qgt~ PQBe three l would be happy to meel v.~th >'ou and discuss these matters further or you should t~:cl l~cc to call mc at q4Q/854-Q553 or e-mail to abruin~on~colnpuscrvc¢om. Ak3:lmt Very truly )'our.s, ~/ .4.,..~/-' ,~.~ .' Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3: 34PM;]etFax .#985; Page 13/19 DECLARATION OF N: THOMAS SHE~HAN, R.G.. R. GP., C.E.G.. C.HG. I, N. Thomas Sheahan, declare and state as follows: 1. I am a vice-president and Principal Hydrol0gist at Dames & Moore. I have a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology and Geography from the University of Missouri, a Certificate in Advanced Groundwater Hydrology:: from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and a Juris Doctor degree !from the University of La Veme. I am a Registered Geologist, Registered Geophysic!st, Certified Engineering Geologist and Certified Hydrogeologist in California, and I aml admitted to practice law in the State of California. Attached hereto is a true and correc!~ copy of my Curriculum Vitae. This declaration, like the previous testimony I provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, is made in support of Cucamongans United for Reasonable Expansion ("CURE") challenge to the Lauren Devel'.opment residential project. I have personally inspected the area in the vicinity of the Deer Creek Basin, Deer Creek Channel, and the existing levee and swale system, and have reviewed technical doctwnents regarding the geological, geotechnical, and hydrogeological asp~.cts of this area. I am not a party to this action. The statements made herein are of my own personal knowledge, and if called as a witness, I would and could testify to the truth thereof. I will be available to testify and respond to questions at the August 20, 1997 Hearing. 2. I previously testified and will testify again tO the following opinions. The removal of the levee and swale system creates significanl~ additional risk to down slope property and residents. The levee and swale system withstood the 1969 floods, the 08120197 HI~H:c81 Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3:34PM;]etFex_#985jPage 14/19 largest flooding event in 30 years. Exhibit "A" is a copy of a Map reflecting the impact of the 1969 flood on the area, and the protection afforded by the levee and swale system. Aerial photographs also graphically demonstrate that the levee .was virtually unbreached despite significant water and debris flow. 3. Removal of the levee and swales is particularly unwarranted in light of new information that calls into serious question the integrity of the Deer Creek Debris Basin. As I testified previously, two potential landslide areas exceeding 100 acres exist in the hills just to the east, and outside the catchment area, of the Debris Basin. If these landslides should be m-activated for a~y reason (quakes, heavy rains, or bums resulting in hydraphobic soil conditions), the Debris Basin Spillway Channel will not hold this much debris and the debris will fill the channel causing the remainder to continue to flow southerly toward the existing levee. Dr. David Willjams, Ph.D, an expert in Debris Basin design, shares this opinion and has provided a declaration toi the City Council. Any overtopping of the Debris Basin places in serious jeopardy thei new Lauren homes and, if the levee and swales are removed, places the existing homes downslope of the existing Ievee in serious jeopardy, also. 4. Other important changed circumstances concerning the integrity of the Deer Creek Debris Basin include the new (1996) information from the Southem California Earthquake Center ("Center") on the probable earthquake magnitude of the Sierra Madre- Cucamonga Thrust Fault which passes through, or very close t0, the ba~e of the Debris Basin, and crosses the spillway channel. The Army Corps. originally designed the Debris Basin in 1980 to withstand a 5.0 quake. According to the Declaration of Dr. Thomas Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460j 11/03/99 3:34PMj].tlf_j&_#985jPage 15/19 Henyey, Ph.D, Director of the SCEC., James Dolan of the Center trenched the Cucamonga fault in 1996 and concluded that the probable magnitude was as high as 7.5. An earthquake of this magnitude would result in significantly more damage than the Army Corps originally estimated in 1980. 5. Additionally, Dr. David Williams has testified that the Debris Basin design is now obsolete, and that new design criteria was developed in the 1990s to improve the integrity of debris basins. He concludes "Based upon my own personal observations and these [Army Corps] new standards, the Debris Basin appears to be undersized. This is another post-1990 changed circumstance that must be considered." Willjams Declaration at Paragraph 2(b) at page 3. 6. I have reviewed a geoteclmical analysis performed by RMA Group CRMA"), consultants fbr Lauren Development, that purports: to compare the relative safety of the levee and swale system to Lauren Development~s replacement berrn and channel. RMA's conclusions are misleading and incorrect for s..Cveral important reasons. In each of the instances discussed below, P,.MA elected to use: dift~rent factors for the replacement berm and concrete channel than the factors which they applied to the levee. Had they compared "apples to apples" instead of their skewed analysis comparing "apples to oranges" the results would be significantly different: the calculated safety factors for the levee would be higher and the safety factors for the proposed replacement berm would (a) be lower. RMA utilized a higher water table for the levee than for the berm without any explanation for this discrepancy. Such an approach artificially 08/20/~7 lt~14:cgl Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460j 11/03/99 3:35PM~]e/,r'ax #985jPage 16/19 ~I~2~3~, P02 increased the load on the levee. the two structures. (b) Calculations must be equalized to truly evaluate RMA reduced the total load of soil ~on the replacement berm and levee by removing the quantity of dirt in the concrete channel. In the levee, they conveniently have added an earthen bluff that increases the soil load. Again, no justification or explanation exists for adding the bluff- (c) In attempting to find the most critical failure surface for the replacement channel, RMA should have provided a gr. eater range for the downhill and uphill extent of the failure surface, as they did fbr the levee analysis. By using a larger range, RMA would likely have found a more critical failure surface, thereby reducing the safety factor calculated for the replacement berm. Instead, RMA used a small range for the berm. On the levee, however, it used a broader range. Again, unless the assumptions are equal, the entire comparison is flawed. (d) RMA used a steeper water-table gradient for the levee that ad~is water to the levee creating an additional load. 7. The replacement berm and channel is 20 feet high; the existing levee is 40 feet high which is 100 percent higher. Further, RMA has not evaluated the integrity of the levee relative to the overall velocity reducing swale system which also will be destroyed. The levee and swales are an integrated whole and must be considered as such. 8- There are several significant defects in RMA's replacement berm designs. Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460j 11/03/99 3:35PMj]e/FaL#g85jPage 17/19 666666666 06/2D/97' ~H,:cOl The safety factor of 1.40 is not enough. Static minimum design is usually 1.5. Based upon the findings of the SCEC, RMA has not used the appropriate earthquake standards. RMA used a 0. 1 5 coefficient, however, a 0.30 or 0.40 should have been used, because acceleration due to a 7.5 magnitude earthquake on the Cucamonga Fault (the extent of jolt when the quake occurs) is probably 0.5 to 0.7. Thus, the true ground acceleration may be four times higher than what RMA used. If that had been taken into account, that is, a higher earthquake load coefficient, the safety factor for the replacement berm would be significantly lower. 9. My conclusion, based upon the above, is that the Developer has not introduced any credible, non-biased, scientific evidence to establish that the berm and channel are sufficient mitigation to removal of the levee. Moreover, RMA has not, and cannot, state that the berm and replacement channel can handle the volume of Debris Flow and flooding that would occur if the Debris Basin failed. once again, the 40+ year old levee has a demonstrated record of withstanding the most serious flood of the past several decades. 10. I have reviewed materials from RMA and from the Hewill and McGuire firm that indicated that the levee is no longer effective because of a minor breach at the top of Paddock Street. Ihis is very deceiving. The entire levee is several thousand feet long; the area of breach is only about 200 feet. Moreover, any breach can be easily corrected (and should have been corrected) by the ~property owner. These arguments arc red herrings without any technical basis. 5 Similarly, the argument that the Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3: 35PM;]etFax .#985; Pag e 18 / 19 ! D8120197 IqHN=c91 levee was breached in 1969 is easily rebutted by simply looking at the topographic maps and aerial photographs attached for your information. Had the levee not been in place, it is obvious that all of the structures beneath the levee would have been seriously damaged in the 1969 flood. 11. It is my professional opinion that the [evec and swale systems continue to keep the people and property downslope of the levee safe from flooding and debris flows. Removal of the levee and swale system increases the risk of damage to property and to the families in the area. The trapezoidal channel proposed as a substitute does not provide protection. 12. The area at issue is zoned for open space and recharge. The Army : Corps of Engineers actually designated the subject property as a recharge area as part of its overall Debris Basin project. For whatever reason, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District has not implemented the Army Corps' recharge mitigation measures. The Debris Basin was designed with a tbur-foot pipe at the ~tower inlet to allow for releases of water into the area. This is one of several water-release valves which I understand the Flood Control District intends to shut off due to the Lauren Development and other proposed developments. The elimination of potentiatly thousands of acre feet of recharge water on an annual basis potentially reduces the quantity of groundwater available to the Cucamonga Water Agency and the San Antonio~ Heights Water Agencies in the event that their allocation in the basin is reduced. As is generally known, California is facing a federal requirement to reduce its allocation of waters from the Colorado River. Groundwater (particularly groundwater recharged from mountain 6 Sent by: LOEB &LOEB 213 688 3460~ 11/03/99 3:35PMj]elfax_#985;Page 19/19 streams) is of higher quality and is less expensive than water imported from other areas. As matters stand now, it is my understanding that the City is permitting the reduction of recharge areas without coordinating with local water agencies of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The failure to implement the Army Corps' recharge mitigation measures is a post-1990 changed circumstance that must be considered. 13. For all of the above reasons, including the changed circumstances described above, a full environmental impact report and careful study. of the subject project is necessary to protect the health and safety of the public and to protect valuable water resources in the area. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tree and correct and that this declaration is executed on August 20, 1997, at Ontario, California N. Thomas Shedhart, RLG. R.GP., C.E.G., C.HG. ~C~24438. P02 7 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 ]6 17 18 19 22 2sI 26 As rnattm stand now, it is my understanding that the City is permitting the reductior. of recharge areas without coordinating with local water agencies of the Regional Water Quality Ccmtroi Bom.d. The failure to implement the Army Corps' recharge mitigation menurn is a post-l g g0 changed circumstance that must be considered. 13. For all of the above reasons, including the changed circumstances I described above, a full environmental impact- repon and careful study of the subj~.,ct project is nece~_-ry so protect the health and safety or the public and to protect valuable I doclsrc under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct that this declaration is executed on August 20, 1997, at Ontario, California N, Thm,,u n.O. r,.or., 7 Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3:32PMj]~#g85;Page 7/19 DECLARATION OF THOMAS L. HENYEY I, Thomas L, Henycy, declare and state as follows: 1. I am a Professor of Geological Sciences at the University of Southern California (~'USC"), and Director of the Southern California Earthquake Center CSCEC"), a National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center with approximately $5M per year budget. I received an AB degree in Geophysics from the University of California, Berkeley in 1962, and a Ph.D. in geophysi~s from the Calitbmia Institute of Technology in 1968. I have been on the factilty of USC since 1968 where I teach and do research in addition to my dudes as Director of SCEC. At SCEC I coordinate the scientific work of more than 50 scientists, and direct an education and community outreach program on earthquake hazards. Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct abbreviated copy of my curricultma Vitae. This declaration is made in support of Cucamongans United for Reasonable Expansion ("CURE") request that an environmental impact report be ec~nductec~ before approval the Lauren Development residential project. I am not a party to this action. The statements made herein are of my own personal knowledge; and if Called as a wimess, I could and would testify to the truthfulness of the statements. As I7 will be ouFof-the country on a planned vacation on August 20, 1997, I will not be able to make a personal appearance before the City Council. HCH24402.X]2 163115407 08/16/97 HHM: tal Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3:33PM;]elFax #985jPage 8/19 2. One of the most pressing and critical issues facing seismic baT~rd planners in the southern California metropolitan region concerns the size and frequency of earthquakes along the Sierra Madre-Cucarnonga thrust fault. This 60-mile long, northward-dipping fault system is responsible for the uplift of the San Gabriel Mountains. Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of a map prepared by Dr. James Dolan CDolan") of USC showing active faults in southern California. Of specific interest shown on attached Exhibit B is the Sierra Madre-Cucamonga fault system, and a recent trench site on the Cucamonga fault where data about the frequency and magnitude of earthquakes on the Cucamonga fault was collected by Dolan in June of 1996. The Sierra Madre-Cucarnonga fault system is relatively continuous and many scientists believe it has the potential to rupture from end to end or along much of its length. The region on the earth's surface thati lies over this fault is depicted as the green area in the upper panel of attached Exhibit~ C. Other colors depict other thrust faults (some less certain than others), but it can be seen that much of the Los Angeles greater metropolitan area sits over a network of these active faults. The SCEC, which was founded in 1991 and is based at USC, has funded studies to gain a better und~n'standing of the earthquake potential of the Sierr~i Madre-Cucamonga fault system to determine how frequently earthquakes occur along the fault and how large they will be. 3. One important way to study the fault's earthquake potential is to identify places where the fault intersects the eanh's surface -- referred to as the fault NCN264OZ.X32 1&3112607 08t16197 HHH:tsl Sent by: LOEB &LOEB 213 688 3460; 11/03/99 3:33PMj]elraL#985;Page 9/19 trace and identified on maps as the fault line -- and to dig trenches across it. The fault and the layers of rock that have been offset by the fault during pre-historic earthquakes can be seen on the walls of the trench. This line of investigatior~ is called paleoseismology. Attached as Exhibit D is a mapping of one wall Of the Cucamonga Fault trenched by Dolan in 1996 which shows fault lines and offsetslayers. The amount of offset can be measured and in many cases the age of the. layers can be determined by using radiocarbon dating to indicate when the offset;. i.e., when the earthquake occurred. Often more than one offset is observed whiel~ reflects a number of past events. Many studies of earthquakes in California and around the world tell us that the amount of offset is proportional to earthquake size. For example, an offset of one meter corresponds to about a magnitude 6, while an offset of about tbxee meters corresponds to a magnitude 7. While the offset of a magmitude 7 is. only a few times that of a 6, the energy released by a 7 is thirty times more than that of a 6 and si._~x times more than a 6.5. :~ 4. Prior to 1991, there were no paleoseismology studies !of the Sierra Madre-Cucamonga fault. Since then, there have been two such studies of the Sierra Madre section of the system between Altadena and A2.usa, and one on the Cucanmnga section just east of Day Canyon Wash 'shown on attached Exhibit E,' All three studies suggest that earthquakes on this fault system are likely to be in the magnitude 6 to 7.5 range. The trenching done in June 1996 on one strand of the Cucamonga section indicates 1 to 2 meters of slip per event, or earthquakes with magnitudes between 6 14CN24402 - X32 163112607 08/16/97 HHM:ts Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460j 11/03/99 3:33PMj]eff~x #985jPage 10/19 and 7. These magnitudes are significantly greater than past earthquakes (magnitudes 4 to 5) reported to have occurred along this section of fault. 5. The Cucamonga fault strands are shown as barbed and dotted lines on attached Exhibit F, and as solid and dotted lines on attached Exhibi$ G (the dotted lines are where the location of the fault is less certain due to poor exposure). Attached Exhibit G shows that the mapped fault trace may pass through, or v. ery close to, the ~base of the debris basin and the spillway. Earthquakes in the magnitude 4 to 5 range would not be expected to break the earth's surface and cause damage to the dam, whereas earthquakes greater than magnitude 6 to 6.5 will almost always break the surface and likely will displace portions of the dam. Also, the ground shaking for the larger events would be considerably greater than for the smaller events. 6. The Cucamonga fault in this area consists of at least three sub-parallel strands. The three strands can be seen as lines with barbs in the red region on the fight-hand side of attached Exhibit F. If offsets take place concurrehtly on more than one strand during an earthquake, then the total offset could be considerably larger than estimated from the June 1996 trench alone, and thus the magnitude could be greater than 7.0. For example, offsets on parallel strands were observed d~ing the 1971 San Fernando earthquake at the far westem end of the Sierra Madre segment. (Note: The various parallel strands of range-front faults such as the Sierra Madre-Cucamonga are not always recognized, or disappear, at the surface in high energy etlvironments such NCN24402.X$2 16~112401 a8/16/97 NHH:tsl Sent by: LOEB & LOEB 213 688 3460j 11/03/99 3:33PM;]etFsx #g85;Page 11/19 as on active alluvial fans, in major drainages, or where man has altered the terrain. This is not only a problem lbr paleoseismology studies as noted above, but also is a concern when developing rage-front property in that City Planners must be careful to identify active strands using careful surface observations, trenching, and/or remote sensing [subsurface imaging] techniques so as not to construct across them. We also know from the 1994 Northridge earthquake, and in retrospect from ihe 1971 San Fernundo earthquake, that ground shaking can be very extreme on the upthrown side of a thrust fault) which could be the situation on the Cucamonga Fault. 7. Finally, determining how long it has been since the last quake is an important factor in evaluating probabilities. It has been estimated that if the entire Sierra Madre~Cucamonga fault normally broke in repeated earthquakes, it should do so approximately every 1000 years (the recurrence interval) and be a magnitude 7.4. If the Cucamonga section broke independently it should do so about every 400 years and be a magnitude 6.9. And if only sections of the Cucamonga fault broke, major earthquakes might range between magnitude 6 and 6.9. So if the d~ite of the last earthquake were known, the date of the next event could be estimated from the recurrence interval under the assumption that successive events always have the same characteristic size -- a very uncertain assumption in many scientists':i minds because earthquakes are not always characteristic nor do they occur with regularity. Since the historic record, which begins in about I800 in southern California, sihows no major HC82t~02 .x]2 1611 let,07 08/16/97 14HH: 5 Sent by: LOEB &LOEB 213 688 3460j 11/03/99 3:34PMj]elFax_#985jPage 12/19 earthquake on the Cucamonga fault, we may well be into a mature part of the earthquake cycle in this region. g, I understand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga tentatively approved the Lauren Development Project in 1990. It is important that the City consider the new earthquake information in determining the safety of the Deer Creek Debris Basin and the safety of homes located in such proximity to a known fault, particularly in light of the new magnitudes estimates discussed above. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing ls true ~d correct and that this declaration was executed on August t5, 1997 at Los Angeles, Califomia. Thomas L. Henyey, Ph.D HCH24402.X)Z 163112607 08/16/97 MHM= 2 3 earthquake on the Cucarnonga fault, we may well be into a mature part of the earthquake cycle in this region- 4 5 8. I understand that the City of Rancho Cucamonga tentatively approved the 6 Lauren Development Project in 1990. It is important that the City consider the new 7 earthq~ information in determining the safety of the Deer Creek E~oris Basin and 8 9 the safety of homes located in such proximity to a known fault, particularly in light of l 0 the new maSnitudes e~tin~tes ~ above. 11 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct 12 and that this declaration was executed on August 15, 1997 at Los Angeles, California- 14 15 ' Y 16 17 18 19 2O 21 23 24 26 27 ~8/16/97 iqllli:tsl 6 THOMAS L. HENYEY. personal lnfornmtion Current positions: March 7, 1941; New York, NY Professor of Geological Sciences University of Southern Califorma Center Director, Southern California Earthquake Center Education A.B. Geophysics, University of California, Berkeley, 1962 Ph.D. Geophysics, California Institute of Technology, 1968 Biographical Sketch Dr. Henyey joined USC in 1968 as an Assistant Professor, and was promoted to Full Professor in 1981. His major research interests include the mechanics of fault zones and the structure of the continental crust. His Ph.D. work at Caltech and early research at the University of Southern California dealt with the thermomechanics of the San Andteas fault and the thermal regime of southwestern North America. Heat-flow observations were used to estimate the magnitude of shear stress on the San Andrcas fault. Later thermal studies were a plied to teetome pwblems of the and evolution in southwe. stem U.S., and more recently in New Zealand. He was coordinator for the CALCRUST consortlure which acquired and processed seismic reflection data from a number of areas in southern California and Anzona. Most recently he has become principal investigator for major geophysical transects across the Transverse Ranges in southern California and the Southern A!I~ in New Zealand. In 1991, after chairinS the Department of Geological Sciences at USC for 2 years, Henyey assumed the role of Executive Director of the Southern California Earthquake Center -- a new NSF Science and Technology Center with primary funding from the NSF and the USGS, and supplemental funding from FEMA, Caltmns and the County and City of Los Angeles. In this position, he assisted K. Aki, the Science Di~,~tor in coordinating a program focused on earthquake hazard analysis and knowledge transfer in southe~ California involving more than 50 scientists at several institutions. With the resignation of Aki as of Jan. 31, 1996, Henyey was asked by the Board of Directors to assume the position of Center Director which he now occupies. Henyey has been on numerous national panels dealing with earthquake issues, and a consultant to the geothermal industry, state and local government, and the port of Los Angeles on earthquake hazards. Some Publications Li, Y.G., T.L Henyey,. and P.C. Leafy, Seismic Reflection Constraints on Crustal Structure Beneath the San Bernardino Mountains, Transverse RanSes, Southern California, .four. Geophys. Res., vol. 9"/, 8817-8830, 1992. Li, Y.G., T.L Henyey, and L.T. Silver, Aspects of the Crusml STxucture of the Western Mojave Desert, California, from Seismic Reflection and Potential FIeld Data, Journal Cleophys. Res., vol. 9/, 8805-8816, I992. Schiffries, C.M. and T. L. Henyey, A possible earthquake deficit in southern California, Oeotimes, .rune, 1994. Henyey, Tom, One shock leads to another, News and Views, Nature, VOl. :375, No.62:58, p. 191, 1995. Li, Y.G., T.L. TenS, and T.L. Henyey Shear Wave Splittin Observations and Implications for the Stress Regime in the Los AnSeles ~asin, Southern California, Bull. Seis. Soc. Amer., vol. 174, seismic reflections beneath a tilted exl~ure of'deep contine~Xtal crust, Tehachapi ~ountains, California, .four. Geophys. Res., vol. 100, 2069-2088, 199:5. Jackson. D., K. AId, A. ComeIf, J. Dieerich, T. Henyey, M, Mahdyiar, D. Schwartz, slid S. Walt1, Seismic hazards in southern California: Probable earthquakes, 19o 4-2024, Bull, Seis. Soc. Amer., voL 85, no. 2, 1995. ///~ AFFIDAVIT OF JAMES GOODRIDGE State of California County of Mendoclno I, JAMES GOODRIDGE, declare and state as follows: 1. I worked for the California Department of Water Resouces for 30 years. From 1978 to 1983, I served as the State CIImatologls./, An important part of my work was in developing procedures for analyzing rain records Ior hydraulic design used by the Division of Dams and for the design of stormwater culverts by Caltrans. 2. My approach to design storms is one based on actual records of rainfall and dream flow rather than third party works such as those published by the National Oceanic and Almospheric Adminldration maps of County Flood Control maps, By relying on actual records, I use the most up-to-date data sets for flood studies. The use of recent data is irrgmrtant because of the upward trend in flood produci~g rainfalls In the last several decades as described in Impact of Climatic Variation On Flood Coni~o/Planning in California attached as Exhibit A. i have compiled rainfall depth duration frequency data on several thousand California weaffier records, 3. The stream-flow records I used for the evaluation of the Deer Creek Watershed are from the United States Geological Survey as published on CDROM by Earthlnfo inc. The rain records primarily were from Climatologica/Data, a monthly publication of the National Climatic Data Center. The rainfall records for this study also include records from the San Bernamino County Flood Control District and the Los Angeles County Public Works Department. These agencies have produced carefully quality-controlled records that are broadly relied upon with confidence for engineering design studies. Attached as Exhibit B is a sample of the rain records rdied upon by this study, The methods I use to analyze rain records are described in Historic Rainstorms in California, published by the Department of Water Resources. To determine a design storm, I combine the results of many records in a region to avoid the situation where a small sample unduly Influences the outcome_ This is a method utilized by the State of California Department of Water Resources and it is the procedure that has been long recommended in Spillway safety studies. Such design storm averaging is the approach used on Exhibit C Analysis of 3 Hour 5'torm in Deer Canyon. This was developed further on Exhibit D a Suggested Design Storm for 1 Day Storm on Deer Creek. 6. The average annual stream flow on Day and Cucamonga Creeks was 12.3 and 10.8 inches per year. This suggests that Deer Canyon runoff was about 12 inches per year based on the similar orlentaiton of Day Creek and Deer Wash and in Interpolating between Day and Cucamonga Creeks. There are no stream-flow measurements on Deer ~k. This may be due to a lack of bedrock outcropping allowing measuring of underflow of ground water along with surface water. The consumptive use of native vegetation is between 20 to 30 inches per year. Adopting a responsible stance by asstaming such consumptive use to be 30 inches per year, the average annual rainfall on the Deer canyon watershed would be approximately 42 inches per year. The year 3-hour storm from Exhibit B is 15 % of the mean annual precipitation or 6.34 inches. The 100-year 3 hour storm is 16.8 % of the mean annual precipitation or 7.06 inches. The 100-year 24-hour design storm would be 50 % of the average annual rainfall or 21.02 inches, ! reviewed records covering the period 1929 to 1972 on Day Creek, the stream draining Cucamonga Peak immediately to the east of Deer Canyon. Attached as Exhibit E are copies of those records from the United States Geological Survey, The average annual flow at Day Creek is 12.36 inches per year over the watershed. It varied from 112 inches in 1969 to a low of .76 inches in 1961. A most significant measurement was 33 inches of runoff in one day on January 26, 1969. The peak flow on January 25, 1969 in Day Greek was 9460 cubic feet per second. This translates to 2083 cubic feet per second per square mile. The 33 inches in one day is the highest rainfall I have ever observed in my 50 years of reviewing rainfall records. Stream-flow measurements are made in cubic feet (or cubic meters) per second. I have divided the flow volumes by the drainage area so that visualize the rainfall and runoff patters. 4070 cubic feet is 8070 or 96,8~;0 acre inches. 96,900 acre inches divided by 4.58 square miles or 2931 acres is 33.04 inches of runoff in one day- I know of no daily California rainfall ~at is higher. Day Creek and Cucamonga Creeks also had very large floods on March 2, 1938. 10. I have reviewed excerpts from the Army Corps of Engineers Design Memorandum for Cucamonga Creek which indicate that the Army Corps calculated that the 200-year storm for Deer Canyon was 3.27 inches over three 'hours, This calculation is substantially less than the 100-year storm based upon the actual rain guage records which would not have been available to the Corps in the 19608 and 10108. Under any circumstances, 3.27 inches Is substantially less than my estimate of the 7.06 inches for the 100-year 3-hour storm :or Deer Canyon. I declare Under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this Affidavit was executed by me on the 1'* day of November 1999 in Mendocino, California. SIGNED AND SWORN BEFORE ME: By: ~Oj~J'Y'f'~d-~~ DATE: SEAL: 0~,, C0mm #1158450 m JDG Analysis of 3 Hour Storm in Deer Canyon Long Elev MAP Avg 81dev 8 8 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 34. ]~ 34.~3 34. 1~ 34.~ ~.~ ~.~ 34.~6 ~.~ ~.3~ 34,3~ ]4.2~ ~,329 34.~3 13~ ~7~ I~ ~ ~ ~5 (75 ~ 47~ ~ ~ ~ 4~0 18.~ 27.~ 18.~ 1733 16.~ 14.~ 29.~ 1234 10.~ 25.~ 33.~ i 1.7 0.~ I.~ 1.~ 0.87 131 1.14 1.74 0.~ 0.79 1.~ 1-61 0.~ 0.~ 0..~ 0.59 1.16 039 0.41 0.79 031 0.30 0.~ 0.55 036 0.~ B ~ 29 18 I~ ~ 17 27 32 45 ~ 17 57 Inches RP2 l.,:)O 1.57 1.48 1.05 1.19 1.03 1.59 0.79 0.69 l.l I i.41 0.82 1.38 RP5 1.47 2.31 2.19 1.55 1.76 1.52 2.34 1.17 F.04 1.67 2.13 1.23 2.08 RP 10 1.78 2.80 2.68 1.88 2.13 1 .g4 2.83 i.42 1.29 2.08 2.65 1.53 2.59 RP 2~ 2.16 3.40 3.22 2.29 2.59 2.~ 3.44 1.72 1.60 2.57 3.28 i.90 3.21 RP 50 244 3.83 3.&3 2.58 2.92 2.53 3.88 1.94 1 .R3 2.94 3.74 2.17 3.66 RP 100 2.70 4.25 4.02 Z86 3.24 2.80 4.30 2. 16 2.05 319 4.20 2.4,t 4.11 lIP 200 2,96 4 66 4_41 3.14 3.55 3.07 4.72 2.36 2,27 3.65 4.65 2.69 4.55 RP 500 3.29 5.18 4.90 3.56 4.03 3.48 5.24 2.62 2.56 4.10 5.22 3.0el 5. t I RP 1000 3.55 5,59 5.29 3.76 4.26 3.68 5.66 2.83 2.78 4.45 5.68 3.29 5.56 RP 10000 4.37 6.87 6.50 4.62 5.24 4.53 6.95 3.48 3.49 5.59 7.12 4.13 6.97 %MAP Units are percent of mcmt annual precipitation (.MAP) RP 2 0.06 0.06 0.0~ 0.06 0.07 0_07 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.04 RP5 0.08 0,08 0.12 0.09 0.11 121.10 0.08 0.09 O. 10 0.07 0.06 0.11 0.136 RP I0 0.10 0.10 13.15 0.11 0.13 0.12 O. 10 0.12 0.13 0.08 0.t)8 0.13 0.07 RP25 0.12 0.12 G18 0.13 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.14 0.16 0. I0 0.10 0.16 0.09 RPS(i 0.13 0.14 0.2{3 0.15 0.18 0.17 0.13 0.16 0.18 13.12 O. ll 0.19 0.11 RP 100 0.15 0,15 0.22 D.17 0.20 0.19 (~:165' 0.17 0~20. 0,13 , , 0.12 0.21 ,0.12 RP200 0.16 0.17 i].24 0.18 ' 0i2 0.~0 , ' 0.19 0.23' 0.15 b/14' 0.23 RPS00 0.18 0.19 0.27 0.21 0.25 O.Z'~ 0.18 0.2l 0.25 0. I6 0_15 0.26 0.15 RP 1000 0.20 0.20 0.29 0.22 0.26 0.25 0_ 19 0.23 0.28 0. 18 0, 17 0.28 0. 16 RP 10(XX} 0.24 0.9,,5 0-36 0.27 0.32 0.30 0.24 0.28 0.35 0.22 0.21 0.35 (I.20 Assumptiond !) Average lunoff of Deer Cyn =12 inch?,s, 2) consumptive use or native vegitation = 30 inches, Average annum rainfall ~- 42 inches RP refers to Lhe return period in years. The return pencKt in tl~ average period in yeans between events of a giver} magnitude. 20.72 i.~5 Average 0.089 0.109 0.133 0.151 0.168 0.223 0.276 Long MAP Suggested Design Storm for 1 Day Storm on Deer Creek 17.74 35.68 7.34 37,32 19.63 20,65 t0.16 In~cs RP 2 3.39 1.97 4.79 1.61 5.02 3.04 3.51 RP 5 5.53 3.22 7.82 2.63 8. 19 4,96 5.53 RP 10 7.00 4.08 9,92 3.33 10.38 6,29 6,85 RP 25 8,87 5. 16 12,56 4.2~ 13.15 7,97 8,48 RPS0 10.25 5.96 14.5! 4.8~ 15.18 9.21 9.65 RP 100 I 1.60 6.75 16.42 5.5} 17.19 10.42 10.79 RP 200 12.93 7.52 18.31 6.15 19.16 11.62 I 1.91 RP J00 14.64 8.52 20,72 6.96 2t ,69 13, 15 13,29 RP I000 I5.98 9,30 22.62 7.60 23.67 14.35 14.42 RP 10000 20.25 11.78 28.67 9.63 30.01 18.19 17.89 %MAP RP2 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.22 0.13 0.15 9,17 RP 5 031 0.32 0.22 0.36 0.22 0.25 0.27 RP !0 0.30 0.4~ 0.28 0.45 0.28 0.32 0.33 RP25 0.50 0.51 0.35 0.57 0.35 0.41 0.41 RP 50 038 0.59 0.41 0.66 0.41 0.47 0.47 RP 100 0.65 0,66 0.46 0.75 0,46 0.,~ 0.52 RP 200 0.73 3.74 0.51 0.84 0,51 0.59 0.58 RP 500 0.83 0.84 0.58 0.95 0.58 0.67 0.64 RP 10C~O 0.90 0.92 0.63 1.03 0.63 0.73 0,70 RP 10000 I. 14 I. 16 0.80 1.31 0.80 0.93 0.87 Pagol JDG 18.1a 15,27 17.57 20.43 14.52 15.53 3.64 253 3,04 3.05 5.54 3,89 4.30 4,92 6.79 4.79 5.13 6,14 8.32 5.89 6,14 7.65 9.43 6.68 ~.8~/ 8.T3 10.50 7.48 7.58 9.78 11.55 8.20 8.28 10,81 12,86 9.14 9.14 12.10 13.92 9.90 9.84 t3.14 17.19 12.25 12.01 16.35 35.13 0.20 0.17 0. I7 O. t5 0,31 0.26 0.24 0.24 0.37 0.31 0,29 0.30 0.46 0.39 0.35 0.37 0.52 0.44 0.39 0.43 0.58 0.49 0.43 0.48 0.64 0.54 0.47 0.53 0.71 0.60 0.52 0.59 0.77 0.65 0.56 0.64 0.95 0.80 0.68 0.80 2.31 2.53 5.72 3.40 4.08 8.91 4. 12 5.09 I ~.00 5.00 6.34 13.58 5.63 7.24 15.43 6.25 8. l I 17.2,3 6.85 8,97 18.9t} 7.60 10.03 21.19 8.21 10.89 22.97 10.09 13.56 28,46 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.23 0.26 0.25 0.28 0.3.3 0.31 0.34 0.4[ 0.39 0.39 0.47 0.44 0.43 0.52 0.49 0.47 0,58 0.54 0.52 0.65 0.60 0.57 0.70 0.65 (I.69 0,87 0.81 1 I/2:99 Long -117.50'2 -117.659 [,at .34.26 34~237 Elev ,'I,140 4275 MAP 29.4,5 3:~-58 Inches RP 2 5.82 5.55 RP5 8.52 8.72 RP 10 10.29 10.79 RP 25 i 2.46 13.35 RP50 1103 15.19 RP 100 15.55 16.9~ RP200 17.O3 18.72 RP 500 18.89 20.90 RP 100{3 20.39 22.67 RP 100130 25.03 28,12 %MAP RP 2 0.20 0. 17 lip 5 0.29 0.27 RP 10 035 0.33 RP 25 0.42 0.41 RP 50 0.48 0.47 RP IO0 0.53 0.52 RP 200 0.58 0.57 RP 500 0.64 0.64 RP 1000 0.69 0.70 RP lO000 0.85 0.86 JDG Suggested Design Storm for 1 · 117.614 -117.698 -117.651-117.65t -117.669 34.274 ,"i4.1 34.06~ 34.062 34.086 7735 1170 986 986 1153 34.26 16.89 12.94 16.81 17.69 5.08 2.57 2.11 2.8_3 2.81 9,32 3.59 3.31 4,23 3.91 12.09 4.26 4.10 5.16 4.64 15.51 ~t.08 5.06 6.29 5.53 17.96 3.6'~ 3.76 7. [ 1 6.18 20.35 6.24 6.44 7.90 6.80 22.69 6,80 7.10 8.68 7.41 25.60 7.50 7.93 9.64 8.18 27.96 8.07 8.59 10.43 8.79 35.25 9.82 10.66 12.85 10.70 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.16 0.27 0,21 0.26 0.25 0.22 0.35 0.25 0.32 0.3 ! 0.26 0,45 0,30 0-39 0.37 0.31 0.52 0.34 0.45 0.42 0,35 0.59 0.37 0.50 0.47 0.38 0.66 0.40 0.55 0.52 0.42 0.75 0-44 0.61 0.57 0.46 0,82 0.48 0.66 0,62 0.50 1.03 058 0,82 0.76 0.61 Page2 Day Storm on Deer Creel 17.685 -I 17.675 -117.267 -I 17.65 -I 17.681 34.052 34.044 34.163 ,34.133 34.136 960 2394 1125 1610 1609 17.38 26.83 16.31 20.45 19.81 21.02 42.00 2.98 4.10 2.17 3.10 3.13 3.40 4.51 6.07 3.49 4.61 4.64 5.30 5.51 7.38 4.36 5.59 5.62 6.57 6.75 9.01 5.43 6.80 6.84 8. [3 7.64 10.19 6.20 7.67 7.71 9.27 8.50 11.34 6.95 8.51 8.56 10.37 9.35 12.48 7.68 9.34 9.39 1 !.46 10.40 13.90 8.59 10.37 10.42 12.82 11.26 15.04 9.33 11.2 ! 11.26 13.91 13.90 18.61 11.61 13.79 13.85 I7.33 0.17 0. I5 0.13 0.15 0.16 0.17 0.26 0.23 0.2 i 0.23 0.2,3 0.26 0.32 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.32 0.39 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.35 0.39 0.44 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.39 0.45 0.49 0.42 0.43 0.42 0.43 0.50 0.54 0.46 047 0.46 0.47 0.55 0.60 0.52 0.53 0_51 0.53 0,62 0.65 0.56 0.57 0.55 0.57 0.67 0.80 0.69 0.71 0.67 0.70 0.84 Io.78 13.33 16.50 18.79 21.112 ~.22 28.18 35.09 I 1:'2/99 FROM LATHAM & WATKINS OC (WED) 11. 3' 99 19:26/ST. 19:18/N0. 4861487146 YOI R Day Cr nr Etawanda Runoff Depth Duration Frequency for Day Cr nr Ettawanda DWR # Y01 11 0670 130 Sau Bemanlino Co~mty Analysis By jDG Drainage Area = 4.58 sq mi / 2931 AC Data from ~ Info IN/6W--~ Maxiragm ds days gor Lndica~[ Numbcr0f Coacecutive Days 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 15 20 Elcvattoa 28'70 F~ Latitude 34.18.5' Long/rude - 117.539° 30 60 W-YR 1928 1929 23 36 45 50 53 55 58 (~O 65 70 99 15t 574 1930 18 32 44 54 63 68 74 81 90 106 I42 227 720 1931 50 73 86 96 104 114 121 125 132 139 159 222 6.41 1932 78 124 164 193 216 237 271 299 355 415 517 666 1231 1933 11 20 24 28 32 35 38 41 60 77 111 201 634 t9'34 52 75 97 t0~ 1t8 125 132 137 154 t71 202 297 678 1935 54 92 110 119 131 144 162 175 200 222 259 403 1421 1936 42 80 105 118 135 152 177 200 272 306 364 427 1090 1937 58 106 141 176- 217 25t 316 376 505 608 778 1449 3211 1938 1'055 1504 1625 1733 lgaff 192_0' 2035 2t37 2625 2882 3230 3983 61t4 1939 103 127 142 152 160 168 176 179 216 263 331 450 1576 I~/l 58 71 84 ~6 109 12t 139 152 176 201 273 511 1206 194t t00 194 246. 282 3t3 341 391 455 697 875 1294 2206 4166 1942 13 24 34 43 5'2 5~ 7~ 88 118 146- 205 356 916 1943 400 504 572 615 646 672 720 775 882 .948 1127 2151 344! 1944 60 86 I06 124 1,413 1.56 186 223 318 427 623 1152 2558 1945 1-69 211 251 277 294 ~ 334 t$1 395 4345 509 920 2152 1946 108 176 ~ 280 204 305 324 340 373 402 452 602 1353 1947 74 94 124 148 169 190 226 257 321 367 446 751 1494 1948 17 23 29 34 37 43 5I 57 72 87 95 122 267 1949 12 18 24 29 34 37 40 43 41t 52 69 13t 271 1950' ~7 36 -~ 52 57 62 70 77 92 l(k~ 126 188 310 1951 6 8 10 10 10 11 11 12 13 15 18 28 97 1.952 59 87 121 14Z I.~ 172 208 253 357 413 549 820 1767 1953 7 13 19 24 ~0 35 46 49 53 7I 92 166 271 195~ 41t 69 77 83 8tl 93 B3 t43 165 182, 244 340' 638 1955 8 11 I3 15 18 21 26 29 35 39 a5 70 247 1956 65 97 ll.O Ikg 123 127 134 139 142 l&5 151 167 291 -1957 40 50 57 4t 65 68 74 79 95 t09 435 225 365 1958' 175 257 301 35~ 405 ' 439 502 554 678 793 951 1333 2403 1959 101 126 139 148 155 161 176 191 215 220 2a4 276 395 1960- 7 10 IZ 13 13 14 16 17 19 22.- 30 40 115 t961 5 ~ t0 ,12 t4 t6 19 19 21 23 26 35 94 196'2 4~1 73 flY7 }~ t54 1'69. 194 2.2~ 272 30~ 352 ,fi2 682 1963 21 34 40 44 47 51 56 60 63 68 75 89 198 1964 9 16 920 24 26 26 Z7 28 30 32 34 46 139 19~5 6 II 14 I7 19 20 23 27 33 42 53 64 125 1966 531 822 933 1020- 107~ 1108 1150 t179 19_29 1262 1309 2332 2743 1967 306 363 399 503 539 563 602 635 700 744 807 927 2641 1968 21 30 38 45 51 56 66 74 105 132 178 273 649 1969 4070 6270 6720 6810 6883 7029 7277 .7392 7555 781] 8051 11030 13785 1970. 19- 28 33 39 47 55 67 78 104 13t 182 302 1158 1971 a5 56 66 77 84 90 100 110 130 147 199 338 I121 1972 27 47 62 75 87 98 118 135 173 203 ,9.51 1973 359 966 Av~,a~e IR6 277 31'0' 331 3,~ 363 3~9 410 ,~3 505 577 84-7 1521 Stdcv 626 ~ l~ 1~ 1~8 1081 1119 1138 II~ 1226 1278 t752 22~ R~ ~ 6~0 6~0 ~10 ~ 7~9 ~ 73~ 7555 7813 ~51 11030 13~ R~n 5 8 I0 10 10 II 11 12 13 t5 18 ~ ~ JEX~ EX H. FROM LATHAM & WATKiNS OC (WED)If. 3'99 ig:27/'ST. 19:18/"NO. 4861487146 Y0T RCuComongl C, rru'U~ Runoff Depth Duration Fmqucn~ for Cucamonga Cr nr Upland AaslysisBylDG DinnaSsAu, s= IO, 14N~mi/6~&IAC Lalimde 34.174' Dall~amFlaJhlnt'o INZ3W-17 Loe~imde -117_531° bum cf'a day$ For ladicaza Number Of Co~cecmive Days 2 3 4 5 6 g 10 1;5 20 30 ell W-YR 1929 ~S~O 32 ~ T$' ~ loll 1,TI 143 162 210 ~ 327 ~ 1361 1.931 46 90 1t8 1,36 1~1 I~I I79 19~1 2~ 242 2~4 36S lO~. 1932 2:t2 340 ~19 48t ~ ~ 628 691 829 ~ 1247 1717 322.5 1~133 31t 50 _~9 67 T'/ 85 97 110 150 lg5 24'7 46l 14~3 192,4 2:36 360 ~ 42~ 4.L9 ~ 487 J34 540 ~ ~ 76~ 1~5 122 149 l(g3 18~ 213 2:34. 271 302 3158 420 517 84d 1917 138 226 293 347 3~7 145 ~33 ~ 954 1132 1368 2664 .i~T2 Z938 2120 2~'49 31C~ 3328 34T7 ~la9 3821 4011 ~ 5010 5513 6376 91-~1 1939 Ig8 2C~ ~ 302 313 323 3..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~3335346 359 381 3..*~ 2303 1940 i15 141 b'7 IT2 I~,~ 195 215 24-1 2~9 ~ 4.35 829 2261 I941 215 356 4..46 -~1 619 6B4 ~j~ 888 1249 1.~43 ~ 3877 7387 1941 23 36 ,16 $7 66 75' 91 10'7 l'4a I8E1 266 4..q 194,3 -~ 690 115 873 923 977 11119 LLS'3 Li33 1863 22.,53 37~ 61~'7 1944 lIB ~ 292 327 ~8 3RR 441 506 669 845 11_S4 11143 ,1601 19a6 218 ~5 3511 392 4;10 444 41f7 518 5t19 644 743 13.t3 4116 1946 248 463 521 3"76 60'/ 62~ all 6~ 727 76~ 8as 1032 2~17 1947 lf~ 2~1 3.'t0 399 t37 ~ $~6 569 662 748 885 1672_ 3513 19411 15 28 38 47 ~5 g 7,4 86 lift 129 IT2 29'2 1123 1.o49 12 20 :16 31 ..~ 40 48 ,f5 79 103 1~2:, 2~4 93R 19,~) 40 61 73 82 90 97 106 113 129 147 185, 361 1951 7 11 15 18 20 ~3 Z7 32 42 ~ 70 i34 570 195'2 100 1,~ 236 281 319 357 ~R) 514 616 679 784 1270 3_s~l 19,~3 I.'~ 2.,t 31 39 45 51 62 7a 97 I28 184 350 1 I76 19511· 220 310 ~ 360 3T3 38,~' 57'1 604 649 676 850 10~3 1.,9a5 19 ~ 26 29 a3 37 44 .56 80 105 132. 281 1146 19~ 125 1113 1911 ~ 216 223 2.35 2~ 2~ 279 317 a05 10,~ 19'~7 ~I) ~'2 6I ~ 75 80 91 99 116 142 18:2 356 19111 227 37'3 484 ,580 691 772 9q0 11119 1383 1~'31 21303 3011 6243 19~9 10fJ ld2 167 189 ~ 231 269 304 ,Tr2 a,7.6 ~ 661 174I 19~ 11 ~ 27 31 34 37 4d t3 68 ~6 I22 224 806 1.961 5 9 12 1.~ 18 21 Z7 34 4~ 53 'r~ 136 1962 611 1~ 178 239 275 ~ 362 409 525 ~ 'r36 962 1901 196a 16 30 38 a3 ,18 5~ 59 65 76 94 120 207 789 1964 17 30 41 a9 ,9 63 7a 84 105 12~ 1~/ 232 75~2 Icj65 29 a9 63 72 79 87 100 118 IR1 232 343e 470 977 19SS 396 ~ ~ 1065 1133 1186 1;~0 1440 1639 1756 1935 3074 4941 Lq67 421 744 921t. 1256 L~6 1396 148,$ Le~ 16~3 IT74 igt3 22ag 6321 lc~8 37 64 91 104 114 123, la0 i,,~ 204 246 312 492 1969 4050 {I)90 6~17 (:~/I 6687 6906 7364 7570 79113 8270 8741 I.'t312 7R2Q 1970 65 112 137 L,~ 186 ~1 2,A8 ~ 36'7 4,28 .~4 J91 2234 1971 100 129 14a 154 1~3 170 184 196 227 235 346 _~17 14,~ 19'72 35 {~3 ~; 106 114 140 165 I87 235 _-r'r7 334 ~ 1099 19"/5 7,~0 975 1027 11777 1117 1118 1194 1232 1328 1432 1684 2489 lit/4 90 133 1,~1 1'I! 195 2I 1 140 265 362 469 605 ~07 15r75 23 34 50 64 77 90 l 12 135 lli~ 224 30(1 lStT~ 549 1760 Average ~ 38.1 436 478 ~ ~ .5117 ~,11 Tit0 R12 949 1423 2:~33 $Mc-v 6~ 9e9 lt.l~ 1065 11389 1124 1196 1236 1322 1398 1..~05 2184 3015 Rec ~lx 4050 6090 6417 6.~1 ~ 69(36 7364 7S70 'm33 g:rT0 fl",'41 13312 17829 P-~Min 5 9 12 15 1~ 21 27 32 42 52 70 134 539 Z 4I ,4~ ~8,41 34_L~I 31 .lilO 30118 30-,$9 29,81 28,48 15.73 23.72 21.67 2235 1638 Ca]~C'V 2-,~7 2524 ~ 2/2g 2.3d9 2.105 '2.0~6 1.958 1.811 1,721 1586 I _-~_~ geg CV 352 3s9 ~ .401 .3s-5 -,Is(} ~ ~ 392 .3~ 379 374 310 C..slc Shsw 4..9 5. I 5.0 4.1] 0,.7 &7 ,1.7 ,I.6 43 4.1 3.9 4.0 3.1 l~gSk. cw l.l 13 13 1.~ t.2 1.0 .9 .8 .6 .7 .7 .6 .4 F/C 1-14 1.0'7 1.04 1.02 1.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 RP 2 278 3T/ 416 449 47l ~ -q64 ~ 702 776 907 1378 RP5 374 ~ ~ 631 4560 Gr2 762 RIll 9--~. 1061 1233 1848 3675 RP 10 a36 624 6H 749 7'~ 813 892 957 I100 1231 1428 2150 41..10 RP2~ 412 746 133 8~6 934 960 10d~ 1117 1270 14~1 16..~ 24,.$4 4642 RP 50 566 83~ !B4 I001 1013 1063 1155 1229 1387 1.~9 1814 26~ RP 100 618 921 1032 11(I1 11a8 i164 1260 1335 149g 1700 1964 ~ ltP 200 669 1006 1122t I~13 1252 1261 1361 1438 160~ 1826 21Ctl 31389 5614 RPS00 736 1113 1249 13'/7 138I 1.379 150~ I~'al 174,2 lgg3 2299 3354 6(116 RPI000 794 11911 ~ 142~ 1488 14~1 I~85 1665 1832 21GI 2423 3~27 6266 RP 113000 941 14166 164a) 1'/41 1808 I775 1890 1971 2136 2A~O 25M5 4108 7112 lhge 1 1 I/2/99 FROM LATHAM & WATKINS OC (WED) ii. 3' 99 19:27/ST. I9:i8/N0. 4861487146 P 34 Rnnoff Depth I)tnXion Frequ~qmL-3/for Cuoamnnga Cr x~ Upland D~V~#YOl 1107~ S,~B~,~o~ Ek"v~23~Fe~ Ai~,,~,tI~JD6. DrshsSeAsa= 10.1, mt.,~./64~4, AC ~ ;t4. I7,1, -L~liade -1 )?.,~1 ' I 2 3 ~ S 6 g L0 15 230 30 t50 W-YR 1t)0 0.12 0,rt) 0.2g 0,,I4 0..40 ~ ~ ~ (X~ 0..94 1.20 l.g.S 5,01 14~1 0,1"7 0;lt 0,4~ 0,,,~0 O_t'~ 0._~ 0,r~6 0,72 0,82 0,8~ L01 1.-15 lg';~ 0.85 I.ZS i._~ 1.~ Lg:t 2.07 2,1'1 2,54 3,(b 3,61 4,,9) t32 11.$'7 ZcJ~ 0-14 0.18 0=2:1 025 028 031 O..'.'~ 11.40 0.i$ 0.,fi0 0.~: 1,70 5,.24 1.9',t4 0,87 1`33 1.49 1.5tl L65 ].71 1.'~ 1..8~ I..m~ 2.11 L'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'~02.8;25.20 1935 0.45 0-55 0.60 0-~9 0.TB 0-~5 1.0O l.ll 1,35 1.54 1.90 3.3I 1936 0.21 036 0,47 0,.57 0,66 0,75 0,92 1,02 1,4.4 1.67 2.00 2.S3 6.66 I~'7 0_qi 0R1 1.0g 1.2~ 1,46 1,64. 1,96 7"56 3.51 4.17 3,114 9.81 ~0,14 1939 0,73 0.96 1.06 I,II 1,15 1.19 1.2~ 12~ 127 13:2 1.40 2.Ct~ 8.d8 1940 0.4?. 0-52 0..~1 0.~ 0.6g 0,72 0,79 0~ 1,10 1.28 1.dO ].05 8.32 1~4,! 0.7~ 131 1.6~ 1.~ 22{I 2.52 Zge[ 3~ 4.dO f65 8..~ 1427 27,1~ 1942 0.Cg 0.13 0.17 0-21 0-24 0.27 02t3 0_.~) 0.,~ 0.6~ 0.98 1,6'7 6,78 1943 2.(Y2 2.54 2.96 3.22 3A0 3.~0 4,01 439 5.64 6,86 8,29 13.9) 22.b'7 194a 0.67 O.92 1.07 1.20 132 1,43 1,62 1,86 2.46 3,11 4.25 6.78 t6.94 194,5 0.80 1.1'2 1.32 1.44 1.55 1.63 1.79 1_91 2.17 L17 2.74 4.9g I-5-15 lg,V, 0.91 1,70 1,92 :2.12 223 2211 2.42 251 2.6~ 2.81 3.05 3.80 10.74 1947 0.60 0.96 1.21 1.4'7 1.61 1,74 1,94 2.09 2.44 2,75 3,26 6.15 19ag 0.06 0.10 0-14 0-17 0_20 0.2~ O_2g 0.31 039 0.47 0.63 l.(lg 4.1~ 1949 0.04 0.07 0,10 0,12 0,13 0.15 0,18 0.20 0-29 038 0-56 1.01 3.45 1950 0.15 0.22 0-27 0.,30 0.23 0.36 039 0.42 0.47 0..54 0.6g 134 4.02 1951 0. G8 0.04 O.05 0.07 0.~ 0.(B 0.1~ 0.12 ~.F~ 0'.19' 026 0.49 2,10 T9~2 037 O_i~ 0,$'7 1,05 1,17 IJ,1 1,62 1,~ 2-27 z59 ~ 4.C~ 13.18 19_~t 0.06 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.16 0.19 0,23 0.27 0.3~ 0.47 0.68 1.29 433 19~, 0.81 2.14 1.25 t3) 1.3'7 1.12 2,10 2..22 2.39 2.49 3,13 3.80 8.33 19~5 0.07 0.08 0. I0 0AI 0.12 0.14 0.16 0~0 030 039 0,56 1,04 4.22 19~6 0-~6 0-6d 0.7~ 0.77 0. 79 0,g2 0.86 0.9O O.97 i ~ ]. 17 1 .~ 3.90 19~ 0.15 0.19 022 0~ 0~7 0~9 0,)4 0,36 0,43 0.52 0.~7 131 3.41 195g 0~ 137 i.78 2.14 2,..j4 2.84 3,~ 4.01 io~ 6.00 737 ll.oE. 1959 037 0,52 0.61 0,70 0,77 0.85 059 !-12 137 1.57 1.~/ 2,43 6.41 1960 0.04 0.~ 0.10 0,I1 0.13 0.14 0.16 0.1$ 0.2~, 032 0,4~ 0.83 2,97 ~961 0,02 0.03 0,04 0.0~ 0,07 0,~ 0.10 0.12 0.17 0~-0 0:st 0.50 l..~ 1962 02.5 0,45 0,66 0,88 1,01 1.3 I_I't 1,51 1.-o3 2.25 2,71 ),3~4 7.00 l~ 0.~ 0.11 0.14 0.16 o.l~ 0.19 0.2~ 0..24 0.2~ 035 0.4,t 0.76 2.91 1964. 0.06 0.11 0-15 0.18 0-21 0.23 o.lq~ oJm (~9 0,46 0-~ 0-~ 2.~ 1~ 0.11 0.111 0..~ 0.~ 0.29 032 037 0,43 0,67 0.85 1.13 1.7'3 3.60 1966 l..t6 2.61 3._'.~ 3.92 4.17 4._-T'/ 4.~g 5.30 603 6.46 7.12 ll.3l 18,19 IS~"7 1.,5~ 2.'/4 3.40 4,62 4.92 5.14 5.47 5.72 6-20 6..53. 6.c~ g.~ 2327 19~8 0.14 024 033 038 0.42 0.45 0.51 0,.57 0.7S 0.90 1.15 1.81 7.11 Ig'/U 024 0,41 O,..q) o,..~ o,4~ 0,77 0,91 i.06 155 1.56 1.9r'/ 2.91 0.22 1971 0.37 0.47 O.33 O.;$'7 0.~0 0.63 0.68 0.72 0~3 0.94 127 1,~0 5.48 1972 0.13 0.23 0-32 0-39 0.46 0.-q2 0.61 0.69 026 1.02 I23 1.62 ,t,05 Hr/3 2,72 3,~9 3,7g ~,_96 4,11 423 4,40 ~ 4d~ 5,27 6,20 9-16 1f65 1974 033 0,49 03g 0.66 0.72 0.7g 0,88 0.~; 1,33 1.73 2.23 33a ,O.,m 1975 o.cl~J 0.1,3 0.18 o24 0.28 0-3~ 0.41 0.-q0 0.~6 0.82 1.10 2.02 6.48 1976 Av~m~: 0,96 1,41 1,61 1,76 I ,$'7 1,97 2,16 2,32 2-69 2.99 3.49 ,5,24 !o.80 Std~v 2,43 3_4'7 .'!.73 3..92 4.ol 4.14 4.~0 4.55 4.$6 5.15 5_'t4 ~.04 11.10 RteMax 14.91 ~ 25.452 24,19.24'62 25.42 27.11 27.$'7 29.09 30. d4 32.18 49.01 6.f63 R~Mil 0.02 0.113 0.0~ 0.06 0.07 0.(16 0,10 0.12 0,1.5 0.19 0,26 0.4t) 1,~ Z 5.75 5~9 5~2 5,72 5,~ 5,6'7 5,67 5.62 5.43 5,,'.'B 5,18 5.44 4.~4 Cak C'V 2-5~7 ~ ;?,j~ ~ 7.149 2.t05 2.0~6 I,B 1.81 t 1.721 I,J66 1,5B5 I,CR8 hlCV ~ 2324 2`3_q~ 2.22g 2.~,1~ 9105 2.~ t.959 l.sll 1.7~1 L,~6 1--~5 1.028 Cak, Slrtw 4,9 ~;,l 5,0 4,8 4,7 4,7 4,7 4,6 4,3 4,1 3-9 4`0 3.| Reg ~ 4,9 5,1 ~,0 4,8 4,7 ~7 47 d.6 43 4.1 3.9' 4.0 3.1 tIC 1.00 1.~0 1.0O I .~0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RP2 0.05 0,0~ 0,17 3,2g 0,.29 0..34, 0.41 0.52 0.7I 0.8'7 120 1,92 6,35 RP5 1,13 13"/ 1,82 2.11 22g 2.40 2,62 .T. g7 3-51 4.06 4.$,5 7.06 13.2.4 ~ l0 2.94 4-I8 4,(~, 5.04 531 5-.S2 5.94 6~2 7.7,6 8.~ 9.~a 13.2S 2B.72 RP2~ 6.15 g_a4 9.64 10.19 10..~ 10.~3 11.69 1223 13.dd |4,$0 ~5.93 23,23 RP:~0 $,S7 I3,1lS 14,09 14.'71) I5.10 15.~B 16.70 1733 18.71} 19,88 21..58 3136 45.9'7 RP 100 12.02 17.'~ lg.91 19_~ 19.99 20.f~. 22.07 22.81 24..29 25faO 27...M 40.35 ~6.18 RP 100t/ 23.11 34.62 36.4~ 37.17 3'7.71 ~ 413d 42..b'7 4431 4600 ,18.63 71.$9 91 RP 10000 35.O4 52.77 55.4~ ~$.(r/ 56,~ig 5956 62,37 a3,69 ~ 6759 70,86 10,t,~ 12102 W 0_ · {ar~hof~ ~;~e,[/"~,~* D~LY PREC]PITATrON f~ STATION: 1~ CR~K ~ STYION ~a~lun: 1209 LY~ C~K RD,, L~ CRHK, CA. 92358 ~t. 34,23~ ~ng. [17.475 [/4 Sec. 0800 CLEMA~LOGXCAL DATA OCT [ 2 3 .09 5 NOV DMX~ JA~ .01 5 7 8 10 L2 15 .16 18 20 Zl 22 23 24 27 29 30 .13 TOTAL .46 .75 1.s7 .02 ,02 1.16 1242 3.86 5.10 .10 l 21.61 3.02 T ,03 .28 .96 1.67 44,47 REMARR~ TOTAL ILndNFALY, FOR OCT 14 & 25 = , 14 16F T, 2N R. 4W Date Established: MONTH FEB M~ APR ~ T .42 1,50 3,54 .95 ~ .02 · .85 .10 l .D3 : 15 .0 L .35 ~40 · 02 .36 · 94 .30 1.14 5.70 6.1:5 ·27 21.62 2. d2 ~. 47 TOTAL ([~CBEB) 74.02 S.B .B. Dar~e 06-03-1996 FiLe NO. 2031 BEA~O~: 1968-69 Elevation; 2730 U.S.G.S. DATLFM Ty~ of Gnuc3~9: 8' STD. )lAY JUN JUL .30 .75 .02 .03 m .D1 15 · 15 . O0 . Do AUG SEP DAY 6 8 10 11 12 ~3 14 15 17 L8 19 20 23 22 23 24 25 Z6 27 29 30 31 Analysis of 3 Hour Storm in Deer Canyon Long Elev MAP Avg Stdev Rex: ~. 125 34.03 34 - . 6 - .1~ 34.~2 34.~ 33.~ ~ B 34.~ 34.3~ t7.525 -117.~ -117.~2 -i 17.591-117.627 -i 17.722 -117.659 -117.B0 13~ ~0 I~ ~ 2~ 655 4275 8m 4~ 18.~ 27,~ 18.02 17.33 16.27 14.~ 29.~ 1234 10.~ 0.~ 1.72 1.~ 0.~ 1.3 i 1.14 1,74 0.~ O.~ 0.~ I, 16 0.39 0.4! O.~ 031 B ~ 29 18 17 :0 I~ 27 32 8 8 8 8 Cq 34.380 34.200 34.329 .'t4.2.33 17,691-117.0&3 -117.42_3 -! 17.266 6860 5965 3860 4530 25.06 33.77 11.7 34.72 1.26 1.61 0.93 1.58 0.58 0.55 0.36 0.50 45 58 17 57 tncbes RP 2 1.00 I .'57 ! .48 1.05 i. 19 1.03 t. 59 0.79 0.69 1. ! 1 r.41 0.82 138 RP5 1.47 2.31 2.19 1.55 i.76 1.52 2.34 1.i7 1.0q 1.67 2.13 1.23 2.08 RP 10 1.78 2.80 2.65 1.88 2.13 1.84 2.83 1.42 1,29 2.08 2.65 1.53 2,59 RP 25 2.16 3.40 3.22 2-29 :~.59 2.24 3.44 1.72 1.60 2.57 3.28 1.90 3.21 RP 50 2.44 3.83 3,63 2.58 2,92 2.53 3.88 1.94 I.IB 2.94 3.74 2.17 3.66 RP 100 2.70 4.25 4,02 2.86 3,24 2.80 4.30 2.16 2.05 3,2c) 4.20 2.43 4.11 RP 200 2.96 4.66 4,41 3. 14 3.55 3.07 4.7'2 2.36 2.27 3.65 4.65 2.69 4.55 RP 500 3.29 5, 18 4.90 3.56 4,03 3.48 5.24 2.62 2.56 4.10 5.22 t03 5. 11 RP I(XX} 3.55 5.59 5,29 3.76 4,26 3.68 5.66 2.83 2.78 4.45 5.68 3.29 5.56 RP 10000 437 6.87 6.5D 4.62 5.24 4.53 6.9.~ 3.48 3.49 5.59 7.12 4.13 6.97 %MAP RP2 0.06 RP5 0.Otg RP I0 0. I0 RP 25 0. 12 RP50 0. t3 ~ RP100 0.15, RP200"' 0.16 RPS0O 0.18 RP 1000 0.20 RP1DO00 0.24 Assumptiond 1) Average runoff of Deer Cyn --12 inch~, 2) consumptive us~i of native vggitatioh = 30 incbeks, Average arinma rairlfati = 42 inches RP refers to the return period in years. The return period in the average pedod in year~ betwoen events of a giver) magniitlde. ' ' Average Uni~ are ~rcent of mean annual precipitation (MAP) %MAF 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.060 0.08 0.12 0.09 fill 0.10 0.08 0.09 0. t0 0.07 0.06 fill 0.06 0.089 0.10 0.15 0.1I 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.12' 0.13 0.08 0,08 O!3 0.0q 0.1{ 0.12 0.18 0.13 0.16 0.|5 0. i2 0.14 0.16 0.10 0. I0 0.16 0.09 0,133 0,14 0.20 0. I5 0.18 0.17 0.13 0.16, 0.18 0.'12 0.11 0.19 0.1! 0. I5i 0.15. 0.2,2 0.17 : 0.20 .0. t9 0.15. , .0.17 0.,20 0,1..3 0,12 0.21; 0.12 0.168 0.17 0.24 0.18 0.22' 6.20' 0.16 '0.19 0.23 0:15 0.14 ' 0.23 0./3 0.19 0.2~7 o.21 0-25 0.23 0.18 0.21 0.25 0,16 0.15 0.26 0.15 0.20 0.29 0.22 0.26 0.25 0.19 0.23 0.28 0.18 0,17 0.28 0.16 0.2 0.25 0.36 0,27 0.32 0.30 0.24 0.28 0.35 0.22 0.21 0.35 0.20 0,276 I!/b99 W IDA U05 U05 U05 Y01 U04 TI2 ×19 Y01 U02 Fg0 Fg0 California Stations Reporting 10 Inches of Runoff in One Day Based on Average Daily Flow 11 0960 013 Haines Cr nr'Tujunga 11 0960013 HainesCrnrTu/unga 1] 096000 HainesCrnrTujunga -118,271 34.264 2430 1.2 58.02 1436 I1 521500 [ndianCmeknrHappyCamp -t23.382 41.835 1189 lX) 10i3.43 78.9_9 11 __~32500 SmithRiver -124.054 41.789 90 609 112.57 83.26 11 067000 DayCrnrhwtnda -117.5B9 M. 185 2870 4.58 34.28 1235 11 0t7'3470 CucamongaC'~nrUpl~nd -[17.531 34.174 2360 I0.1 .t4.28 t0.80 11 104003 Tol:ran~r, iCtnrTop. at~ga -118,569 34.067 266 17,9 22.60 4.46 11 138500 Siaquoei~ru'::~i.st~oc' -120.167 3,4.8ilq 624 44.9 3V;i'.49 1332 10256500 SnowCrnrWhilewater -!16.680 33.8~1 200 I0.8 24.58 tO74 1107:58130 SantiagoC'ratModjeSh -117.644 33.42~j I210 13 26. t2 7,9~ I1 l17600, Coyote Ct nr Oak VieW -119.370 34.4L7 577 13.2 25.28 11.55 lI 4631 70 Big 8atpher Cr al The Gcyseps Sonoma ~122801 38,798 1420 13.1 71.98 1t 4631 70 BigSuiphetC'ratTheGeysers Sonorna -122.801 38.798 1420 13.1 71.98 46.03 ·: F~ ,~hgel~' :' '-'11:8.271" ~.~ ' 2430' i.2' 5~02' 'f4.36 Los Angeles -118.27I 34.264 2430 1.2 58.02 14.36 La~ Angeles Siskiyou Det None San Beman~lno San Berrtardldo Los Angeles: ~vcnide · Max Day Peak Pe, ak ,, 21:69" 7m 9_~ i21:"iGg2 10.~ 3~ 142 118 I ~ I 23 11.15 3~ 74 62 [~ 2 22 I5.61 30,~0 39,~ 325 1~ 12 22 I{L~ 1~,~) 228,~ 374 1%5 12 22 ~.~ 4,070 9.4~ 2,~3 1%9 I 1491 4.0~ 14.1~ 1,3% 1%9 1 25 1 G22 4,~ 1 ~) ~2 i %9 I 25 12.~ 14,~ 21.~ 4~ 1%9 I ~5 12.~ 3,4~ 9,~B 917 1%9 1 10,~ 3,5~ ~5~ 5~ 1%9 2 24 IZI6 Z9~ 8,~ ~ 1~ 3 4 I 1.13 3.9~ 5,7(B 435 1 ~ 2 17 10.~ 3,7~ 7,5~ 576 1~5 3 9 Column headings: . : : Maximm Sq Mi = Wat~bshod siz~ in ulu,are rriites. MAP = mean audual. Vr~cipflatioh MAR = mean anfiual MDR = Maximum Daily Runoff cfs = Max Day Peak How in Cubic Feet Per Second, Baesd on Average Daily Sows as tryerred by USGS cfs = !nstantaneotm Peak CSM = Cubic feel per second,per square miW. JDG 13/19/99 Fi0M LAT~M & WATKINS 0C (IVED)ll. 2'~; .~:20/'ST. i9:i8,/N0. 485148'7146 P 7 Impact of Climate Variation On Flood Control Planning in California By Jim Goodridge Box 750 Mendocino CA 95460 Prepared for the 1999 Califomia Weather Symposium Sierra College, Rocklin CA, June 26, 1999 Abstract lfthe rainfall climate were a stationary time series. oct 50-year period would be as good as any other for defining flood threats. This is not the 'reaE~-. The more recent 50 years is considerably wetter than the previous 50 years with impor, an{ lessons for flood control planning. Rainfall dam of the last 100 years were examined on several scales ifsWnn dinlion for long term trends, These included the maximum one-day, r. en and thirty consecutive days and the annual total rain. On each time scale there is a notable =crease in rain in the last half of the records. Flood control planners need to have current and reliable hydrologic records to forecast ~rending flooding potential. Engineering design feeds off the rhn sets that are compiled for current weather and flood forecasting; but with an added ~ of needing well-documented and long historic records. Knowledge of both the historic scene as well as data trends are critical to understanding flood threala. The realities of climatic variation need be rooted in ~Tvation. The increased climate variation in California j~ related to sea stirface temp,n-~_ac and ocean currents. Forces associated with ocean currents and upwelling are examined. T~'~ir impacls on both rainfall and temperaran lends are studied. These forces include Solar ~ variations and thcrmohalinc cycle invigomtion and length of day variations. The impact of observed c!irna;e variation on older flood ccnlrol projects is that based on current hydrologic records they are undersized for their intended level of protection. Why is the weather changing? We have lived with ;he concept of climate as a stationary time series since Dr. Rcichelderfer's time. It's time for a fresh look. The some of weather and climate is solar energy. The reality of clim~.'c variation has to be rooted in observation. Solar radiation has been measured at ground level for many years. The energy output of the Sun is about 1366 Watts per square meter at the top of the atmosphere. Clouds and water vapor reduce this energy at ground level by 50 to 90 percent. Ground surface measurements of ~lar energy trends are therefore rot helpful in assessing FROM LATHAM & WATK!NS OC (WED)ll. 3'99 ig:20/ST,'Ig:18,,'NO, 4861487146 P 8 variation in solar output. The Smithsonian Institute supported nearly a hal f-century of unsuccessful solar constant investigation at places like the top of Mount Whitney and Table Mountain early this century. The ground bast solar energy measurements have an accuracy at best of only a few percent. The Solar Constant has been measured successfully from above the atmosphere aboard orbiting satellites since 1978. These measurements have varied from 1365.6 to 1366.7 watts per square meter. The solar constant measurements were found to vary as the Wolf Sunspot Numbers. The correlation coefficient between the Solar Constant and sunspot numbers (r^2) is .9 indicating that 95 % of the variation in the solar constant is described by sunspot numbers. A solar constant index was developed for this study for the period 1700 to 2006. NOAA estimated solar constant values from several satellites were used for 1977 to 1998. Correlation was made with the measured sunspot numbers for 1770 to 1976 and from the NASA projected of stmspot numbers for the 1999 to 2006 periods. The solar constant has been the highest since 1770 in the recent 50 years (See Figure I ). The additional heating on Earth from a higher solar constant can only cause a greater evaporation from equatorial oceans, more atmospheric water and therefore more clouds. More evaporation means a higher salt concentration on the surface of the equatorial oceans. A greater water density due to increased salt of the surface waters of the equatorial oceans means an invigorated thermohaline cycle of Eanh's oceans (See Figure 2). An invigorated thermohaline cycle results in more upwelling of cold ocean bottom water of the Asian Coast at about latitude 40°N. This upwelling if real would be evident in the sea surface temperatui-e pattern of the North Pacific Ocean. Figure 3 is a map ofthe Pacific Ocean North of Latitude 20°. The main feature of a 5 l-year thermal history of the North Pacific Ocean is a declining temperature trend. This covers the 51 years from 1947 to 1997. 'lhis temperature trend in the North Pacific varies from about -5°F per century off the Japan Coast to +3 ° per century off the Central California Coast. An invigorated thermohaline circulation could result in higher sea levels on the California Coast that would reduce upwelling of cold water. The upwelling index of the NOAA Marine Fishery group supports this concept as shown on Figure 4. The upwelling index is actually computed on daily. This generates fir too much data to visualize long term trends so the plots of Figure 4 are a nine-year nmning average of the annual averages. The trend at 39°N and 125°W Shows a sharp peak in mid 1970's. The sea water temperature at Bodega Bay is shown on Figure 5 with an upward trend of about 3°F per 100 years and a notable upward trend starting in 1971. The San Diego records on Figure 7 illustrate a relationship between sea level and air temperature. Nine-year averages of trend-adjusted sea level and trend adjusted air temperature records look remarkably similar in their long-term trends. FROM LATHAM & WATKiNS OC (WED)ll. 3'99 19:21/ST. 19:18/N0. 4861487146 P 9 Tropical storms represent the connective dissipation of heat of sea water over about 80~F. WarneT sea surface teml~ratures mean an increase in the frequency af tropical storms. Tropical storm frequency of the Eastern North Pacific ~ has increased from about I0 per year to, about 18 per year over the last 50 years. The number of tropical storms per year is shown on Hgure 6. Air temperatures at coastal sites ate highly conclate4t with the sea surface temperature as shown on Figure 8. The land based air temperatures at C_s_!,_'fornia stations were correlated with the sea surface temperature at a five-degree grid point centered at 35'N and 125°W and shown on Figure 9. The areas of high correlation with sea surface tempexamres are adjacent to the coas~inc. Interior valleys show little or no correlation of air and seawater temperature. The high sea surface temperatures could have influenced urban heat islands studies, as most large California cities arc adjacent to the Pacific Ocean. The degree in which the sea surface temperature influences the urban heat island studies dFigure 10 remains to be studied. The annual total rain history of California has been modeled using 39 rain long- term records that were complete for the period 1876 to 1998. These were averaged arc plotted on Figure 11. There is an upward trend in this dam set The recent increase in wet years iS evident since there were 6 years over 40 inches in the last half of the record and only one in the tirst half. A nine-year running average d the coefficient of variation (CV) was used on Figuse 12 to model the trend in wet yest frequency. The increase in CV after I975 (from Figure 12) corresponds with an increase in sea surfarc temperature for the Northeast Pacific Ocean (shown on Figures 3 and 9). The CV increase corresponds as welt with the decxease in the upwcilin8 index shown on Figure a, and the increase in sea surface temperaim shown on Figure 5 for Bodcga Bay. The increase in CV furthc~ corresponds with the increase in tropical storm frequency shown on Figure 6. The increased variation in California rainfall seems definitely related to sea surface temperature and ocean currents and hence with the increase in the Solar Constant An increase in severe flooding is also associated with the increase in CV as shown in FiKur~ 13 where the number of 1000-year rainfalls in California has increased along with the CV. Douglas Hoyt and Kenneth Schatten in their book The Role of the Sun in Climate Challge used a 45-year running average of WoW Sunspot Numbers to their studies. This suggested a similar investigation using C. alifornla rain records. There was a 1930 study for a raidall index for Los Angeles based on proxy records at the Old Spanish Missions extending back to 1769, by H.B.Lynch. When a 45 year CV based on rainfall combined Lynch record and the Los Angeles rain records was prepared. It was compared to the aS year .tnmning average of the solar constant series. A plot of the Solar Constant and Los Angeles rainfall index shows interesting peaks in the presem era and about 1850, as shown in Figure 14. FROM LATHAM & WATKINS OC (WED)!i. 3'99 19:21/ST. 19:!8/N0. 4861487146 Changes in the rotational velocity of Earth are an expression if the angular momentum of the combined ear, i and atmosphere system_ Tl~e tolal mass of the atmosphere is about fig equivalent of a ball of lead 60 miles in diam~,r. The length of the day vawiations (LOD) ate monitored daily to millionths of seconds by the Naval Observatory who have kindly supplied data for this study. Variation in the east-west wind component is n~sponsible for over 90 percent of variation in the LOD. The correspondence between the variation in LOD and ocean upwelling off the California Coast (as seen on Figure 15) suggests a-wind driven system rather ~ a simple thermoh~!ine driven sysusm. This is because of the dominan~ of atmospheric influences in LOD variation. A decrease in oceanic upweHiag in the mid 1970's off the California Coasx follows the mid 1970's decrease in the LOD variation in. The therrnohaline driven system provides the cold water in the Western North Pacific Ocean. TIme dominant long lasting trend in cold water suggesl:i higlgt bamn~tric prr~ure in the west. The warm temperatures of the F~_mtem North Pacific Ocean suggests long lasting low baromewic pressures in that region. The pressure differences could drive the winds reflecting in the variation in the LOD statistic. A decrease in oceanic upwelling is therefore indicates an increase in sea surface temperature (as seen on Figure 16). An increase in sea .surface texnp~ratur¢ off our coast means an increase air temperature trends in California (as seen on Figure 8). The inta~t~ in tropical storm frequency in the North-east Pacific (as seen on Figure 7), the increased variation in total rainfall and tl~ number of extreme rainfalls (as seen on Figure 13) are all associated with th~ higher SST in the North-east Pacific Ocean. The conclusions from this study are that California rainfall and 2mperamrc variability are in response to an increase in the "solar constant" and the observed atmospht~ric heating is from sea stirface temperature and increase and mtan thermal pollution and trot a "global greenhouse effect". The upwelling of cold water on the Asian coast is quite clearly driving our West Coast temperature s upward and increasing our sever storm frequency. 5/18/99 4 Ft0M LATHAM & WATKiNS 0C Trends Storm Duration a Maximum 1 Hour -0.96 Maximum 6 Hours 0.43 Daily - 1.05 10 Days -3.44 30 Days -7.33 Annual -4.33 Annual 10.2 (WED) ll. 9' 99 Extreme Rainfall Linear Trend 19:22/'ST. 19:lS/'NO. 4861487146 in California Period of Number of b Record Stations 0.00075 1940 - 1998 97 0.00048 1940-1998 98 0.00175 1898-1997 83 0.005 1898-1997 83 0.0081 1898-1997 83 0.0146 1898-1997 83 0.0084 1876-1998 39 A stationary time series would have a slope "b" of "0" Stationary with respect to what? In this case Hood Control Project Development. ' FROM LATHAM & WATKINS OC (WED)ll. 2'99 ig:22<"ST. 19:lS,<'NO. 4861487146 ~:~lar ~ 1700 to 2006 -F' FROM LATHAM & WATK!NS OC (WED)ll. 9'99 19:22,'ST. 19:iS,,"NO. 4861487146 ./ and ~lly deep currein' Figure 7.12 The ocean global [hermohalinc circulation, Colder wa(cr in the norlh Afianiic sink~ Ic> lhc dccp ~cnn, I~ rc~u~acc and bc fcwi~rnlcd in Ihc h~di.e1 a.d norlh Pacific Oceans. Surface currcnt~ c=rry 111c wnrmcr ~tI'GiIII hack a~nin fllrou~ll Ihc I';~cific :rod ~,.th Allimlic 'lhi~ c, cuil I;t~c~ :lllll(2~t l~ yc~, (Souse: Orccckcr, 1997.) Figure 2 Used without Permission Frem: Meteorology Scvcnth EditiOn By Richard A, Anthes Publishca by Prentice Hall 1997 FROM LATHAM & WATKiNS OC (WED)I1. 3'99 19:22,,/ST. lg:18,.'N0. 4861487146 P 14 51 Year Trcnd in North Padtic Sea W~r Temperature 1947 to 1997 T~' · -.O3ta..OI * - OJ to .OI · · · · , 4~ · · · .01 e · · I~ · * · · · , , · · · , · I · · · · · ® · · · · · , , , , Warmer S ! Nocth Pacific Occa~ Te, m~mre Treads l~o e, FROM LATHAM WATKINS OC (WED) 11..~' 99 19:22,,"'ST. 19:18,,'N0. 4861487146 Up .Welling Index From North American West Coast 200 9 FrAy 39/12S I YrAv 4Z/125 I Yr Av 4&/12: I YrAv 46/1:1.S Sea Su~ace Temperature at B~xlela Bay 1.9_~'7 t~, 1880 is'k) ~i4~re S FROM LATHAM & WATKINS OC [WED)li. 2'99 !9:22.,"ST. 19:IS/'NO. 4861487145 P 16 Trod Adjusted ~ L~vcls ~ Air Tcrn~ratu.,~ Coml:n&f~l FROM LATHAM & WATKINS OC (WED)ll. 3'99 ig:2>/ST. 19:IS,,"N0.4861487146 P i7 California Air Temperature Vs. Sea Surface Temperature at 35°N 1250W 42 ~ ,I ' 0 O' Data for 1948 to 1997  0 0 0 0 U,m~s r~2 ~ ° * · 0 ~.~ 41 - ,~ 0 \ ' · o ~ : a -3-,4 0° 40 - · ' i · .~-.~ O~ 39 ' - o · ::'o °o 38 - · ~ o O ' O O o o O 37- . o · O O ~ · O O 36- ~ · · o · = o e 35°N I~°W ~e~ °o 33- 32 , , , , , , , , , -125 -124 -123 -122 -121 -120 -119 '118 -117 -I16 -115 -114 FROM LATHAM & WATKiNS OC (WED) i!. 2'99 19:28,.,'ST. Lg:'LS,,"NO. 4861487146 P 18 Sea Surface Temperature at 30°N & 125°W 66- 63 .. .9 o 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 T 990 Year 2000 Hgurc9 FROM LATHAM ~ WATKiNS OC (WED)If. 3'99 19:23/ST. 19:iS/NO. 4861487146 GLOBAL WARMING An Urban Phenomenom in California Temperature Trends at 107 Statons for I909 to 1994. Stratified by 1990 Popu/ation of the County wher~ station is located. t I ! t9/95 JDG Al~ueat Olobal Warming wiU not be mxdemood ~ by deoompoaiag th~ data into individual alalion records and evaluating the long term twnds at each wcord sepattly. The appm'ent 'Olobal Warming' is in tealit,/utbem waste beat affeaiag only titban areas. Te ~ the wctlds uaniaerana= in ci~ i~ lfi~ lal6ag it at the site of a feelerlag ~gul~ 10 FROM LATHAM & WATKINS OC (WED)ll. 3'9~ ig:23/ST.I~:lS,,"NO. 4861487146 P 20 California Avta'age Rain 1876to 199g ,--e---,, Vm'imioa/a ~lifotaia Raiafall 11~'76 ~o 1998 I I .. FROM LATHAM & WATKINS 0C (WEDill. 5'99 19:2S..'ST. 19:LS,."N0. 4861487146 California Rainfall Variation and Severe Storm Frequency Compared B~__~d on ~he averag~ of 83 nsin n~osxis wi~ dam for 18P8 Io 1997. ................ ............ ................. ..............i ............... ................. ................i!.i .......... ..... .. ' --- s 1917 1927 19f/ 1967 1977 4 o FROM LATHAM & WATKiNS OC (WED)l!. 3'99 19:24,/ST.!9:IS/'NO. 4861487146 P 22 Vadation in Rainfall at Los Angeles Compared with the Solar Constant I770 to t9c~ O.6 ! ~ 45YauAv=m~SolarComU~ I ' ~ 1365.7 1800 lt.~o 1900 aglO 2006 Rsitt~ 4:bluff-am LmAnedm g3eic Oss2mr I~'~J so 19~sud fx,4sm R i~ ~ RA|NFALL .,~qD 5TRF. AK4RUI~..(I;'F IN ~ ~ S~ The Mttt~li~m Wsstr ~ d' S.o,,d----. C~tI~,,. Aesemt 1~3. S~ar ~csSsts ~ fmm~ ~/.;F~-nedG.tsMs, ge2,v/STI:~CI..A.I~U~TA/~R..JRRADIA~~I.rI~ r'LT ~c(ctc IS~TS*sdat~assm:t~-.,,;.;~,~t=t~dfs,~m SemSp~lndes_ Figure 14 FROM LATHAM & WATKINS OC [WED~ii. 2'99 19:24/ST. 19:IS/'N0. 4861487146 Idpwelling Index and Length of Day Compared 7O 1 g'SO 19~0 '-3 1970 1980 Figure 15 |- -I t20 Ughveiling Index and Sea Sudace T~..taters Compared y,s~r Figure 16 51 2000 STAT i OR s Lat, 34,23] Loag. 117.475 T~ O~ 0~e~a=iOn~ 9800 R~ ORbed F~l C~IC~ OX~X Other Elevationm Type of Gau~em Fkle No. 2730 ~AY OCT ROY D~C J~ l~B HAR JL~R ~AY J~N JUL AUG .20 °08 1:59 T .42 1 2 4 .as 5 6 7 8 9 10 1.67 .01 .02 .02 .15 . .26 · , ~:62 .35 3.86 · 15 5.10 .02 .36 5.89 .94 .30 .10 1.14 1.07 5.70 21,6t 6.15 3.02 .03 .28 31 12 13 14 17 18 20 : 10 .27 .30 .08 II 22 24 25 .75 .01. 2.02 1.47 YEAR TOTAL, (IBCRE8) 7&.02 ,02 · 03 T .01 · 06 .t5 26 27 ]~ 28 29 3O :13. · OTAL ,46 .96 1.67 44.47 TOTAL RAII, rF.MaL YOR OCT 1.4 & 15 = . 15 D~te 06-03-1996 2037 1968-69 U,S.G,B, DATUM S~P 1 2 1 S 10 11 12 13 14 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 2"; 27 38 30 ..... 31 ,00 FROM LATHAM & WATKINS 0C (WED)f1. 3' 99 19:24,/ST. 19:18/N0. 4861487146 196:2 1S~i3 15r>4 1~55 .L.q67 I~0 1,971 19'~G 1977 lcf/~ Lv79 L,q61 19')0 199'7 Rajnl~ Depth Durafiml Frequ~cy far Rnnnlng 5pdngs aa;aylzl~ I)W'I~DL,A Lzm~i~,.~.. -IIT, 0EP 1OM' 0.13 0'.21 0.21 0.24 0_'.'~ 0-14 ill1 0.10 Q. I4 0-16 0.10 O3A O,Z~, O. 19 0.1S 01.5 0. 1 ~ 0.29 ilLt 0,~0 039 0,70 0,~ 0~ 0.~ 0,~ 0,61 ~41 O~ O~ 0.74 ~ 0.~ 0.41 0.~ ~ 0.~ 0~ ~2 ~ 0~ O~ 032 ~ o~ O~ 0.16 O~ ~ O~ O,e ~ 0~ ~ 0~ I.~ L.~ 0~ 0.~ ~ t.10 0.~ ~ 0.~ · ~ ~ 120 ~ ~ 1.~ Ol ~ Ol OJO ~ 0.~ ~ ~ 0,~ ~ O~ O~ 030 o~ 0.~ 0.~ G~ 1.~ 0,.?~ 030 0,2,1 0,21 0.19 0.19 0.'~,4 &t~ ~ 3~ 1.~ I.~ .~ .~1 319 1.6 15 I, 14 i,~ 1.~ l,~ I.Ol G~ ~ 033 ~ 0,~ ~ O~ o51 0~ 0,~ 0.~ 1,~ ~ 0.~ t,01 1~ t,~ O~ O~ l.t~ 0,~ L~ [.01 Li5 t~ 1.~ 1.~ ~5 ~37 Z'4umlzrOf ~vcD~ 21t 3H 61,1 19.2I-I ID C-Yr L42 1.8~ 3.~ 4,7] 334 48.61 z.~s Li'7 2. 15 ~ ~ 63.64 (171 0-~ 136 l,g/ .7..25 19.14 1,~ 11 3_?7 477 8.86 I..tl 1.8'/ 326 4,7~. 6.60 1.21 Ilal 2.'?B 4,11 7,f7 1.13 1,?0 ~ 2`~ 4,11 ilg, t 0,96 l...~ ':'08 3.88 Zig7 I. 10 1.37 1.9`7 1 21 4 'B (1,77 0,8~ 1~6 2,T7 4, 17 31.7'/ 0..';'2 1.0[ 1.iS 2-5~ Z74 ~ 1.8a, I-TG 332 629 t934 I-Z3 1.65 ~ 4,10 121 0.67 0,75 1.22 I 54 1,9S I_,13 1.~9 3.10 4-81 812 0.It 1,11 1';~' 2,44 2.56 1.15 x.GL 2,90 4.8:! &80 036 t,4~. 2,46 ,t00 4.221 1..20 1.TR 3 15 4.Q~ 5.15 0,91 1.0t Z, 06 Zg7 2.96 17.29 0.82 18~2 1.41 1.89 2.09 2.6.23 0.66 0-88 1.2.5 ~41 3.45 L14 1.4;5 2..91 4,'?'2 5.87 1,16 1343 [,62 '*~ 3.84 1'7.~,4 L74 2.13 t_16 5.'T? 7.49 65.02 1-f~J Z ~C, 4,_'20 73,0 L'Z2,0 3.10 ~4.10 0.70 Oan 1.00 lJlo 2,(xO 19.0o 2JO ~ ~ 9,11 14.S4 !..~0 1.1) 100 ~-ID 5,80 I_X} 1.~ ,t.10 f90 ZTD 35.10 1.00 1.~0 2.ffi 2.(~) 2. r:~ 16-00 1-30 1.13 130 3.10 ~.~ I1.50 LO0 130 I~0 t00 3.40 2.~.30 I3e 321] 3.~0 ~,,'~ 7.gO 6930 (IX) 1.00 LIO 1.70 I~0 1,41) ~,.~ 4,CG 520 6.l~ ..~.~0 L,~. LTO 2~40 5.70 5,t) L20 .L60 ~ 3 60 4,,2~ 1570 1.20 1 .~ 2.~ 4.g3 6.~0 1.60 2,00 2,80 3.~0 4.30 31.20 O...q) ~ L,-I,O &~O 1.6{1 19.e~ 1.00 1,SD ZI2, 4`.10 5"~ 12.0 1,(~ 1,F~O 4,10 'T.~ 22,~0 LIO L,,qO ~ 3.00 3_~ 0.70 l.O0 1.80 2.,I0 2.80 0..,~0 0,~0 120 i,l') 2.10 1.10 2.a) J.00 370 6j0 49.20 I,,'~ l. J0 2,20 3.40 4/o~ 1.2o l,r~) 2..51:) 1(.,0 4~o 1.20 1.61 2_51 3~1 5.19 ~ 0'ffd 0.85 1,4S ~ 16,54 L~O 3,4O 5.90 9*80 lddO O..qO 0.71} L[X) 1.~4 1.90 1.91 ~ 985 ).4j 3.89 3 15 .341 _1.40 390 .4~'~ ,482 .,~3 ,4~4 .476 .~. 1.3 1.3. 1.2 1,1 1.0 t.l 1.3:) 1.0o 1.oo I,UO 1.oo 1.05 1.41 2.21 1-/6 4,.=~ 31J8 L~7 2.6~ ~ lO 6,07 &:IS Z44 3,18 5.07 ?,.~C, 1033 2."~ 174 5."~ g36 11.76 847 3 12 4,20 (,,g8 9.~ 13.1'~ ~.15 ,t~ 717 m.61 ~4.5o rlls. 14 188 5.1l 8,05 [ i,~t~ 16._-13 ~2.01 4L~2 5.8t 8.74 I i~ ~7 '~ 9113 i2~ 7.12 lil~ 16.21 9~111 I19. L9 Page 1 11/Z/99 LATHAM & WATKINS OC (WED)!I. S' 99 19:24/'ST. 19:18/"N0. 485[487146 Y01 D Lytle Creek RS Rainfall Depth Duration Freqnency for Lytle Creek RS DWR # Y01 5218 00 Analysis by DWR DLA Dam From: Climatological Data San BertmMino County 8am 2N/6W-26 Latitude 34.23 1 ° Longitude - 117.474° Elevation 2760 Feet Maximum PainfaR For In~ica~ Number Of Coneeeutive Days 2 3 4 5 6 8 l0 15 20 30 60 W-YR 1981 232 4.44 5.13 5.1.3. 5-68- 5.68. 6.05 6.75 6.75 6-75 8.35 14.98 20.34 1982 6.80 tO.O/ I0.56 11.44 I2.21 12.51 13-86 13.86 14.13 19.14 20.65 23.95 42.55 1983 8.4! 10.73 12.20 15-95 18.27 19.38 19.55 19.56 19-58 20-01 23.22 40.81 76.17 1984 3.60 5,50 5.50 5-51 .5-5t 5.51 5.51 5.52 6-24 6,24 920 14.30 20-92 1985 4.65 7.10 8.92 .9--92 }2.37 12.3.7 12.3-7 12.69 17.31 17.74 18.34 23.24 32.30 1986 4.59 5.84 5-84 6-34 8.55 9.05 10.15 10.15 10-36 13-89 16.21 26.37 45.61 19~7 2..54 4.04. 4,04 4-.8.0 4-80 42d) 4.80 4.80 4.80 430 4.92 7.19 16.07 1988 3..80 5.50 5-50 5-50 5.50 5.50 5.88 6.54 6.92 6-92 7.29 12._36 35,09 1989 2.90 3.61 3-89 3-9'3 3.97 3.97 3.97 6.1-4 6-25 6.35 7.85 12.39 19,17 1990 5-18 5.27 5,27 5.79 7.23 7-24 7.79 7.84 7.84 7.84 8.23 14.49 20.30 1991 825 1~,.15 14.30 14_35 1435 14.88 14.93 14.93 16-01 2033 28.80 29-13 33,01 1992 6.00 11.02 13.22 1339 13.49 .15.24 15.76 17.61 18.01 18.01 22,78 33.81 4&19 1993 9,90 10-10 13.00 t4.42 1832 24.52 24.90 25.70 37.72 37,72 44.8l 66.26 86.54 1994 6.98 6.98 6.98 6-98 8.78 8.78 8.78 8.78 10.68 12.31 13-17 17.84 23.85 1995 8.55 11-80 14.80 18.00 18.80 19.43 25.05 26-95 27.78 28.18 34.89 43.94 71.75 1996 7.00 12.10 13-35 1335 13.35 13-35 13-98 15.03 15.06 1734 20.77 23.71 32.61 1997 4:-g5 6.62 7.42 7.42 7.42 7,42 7-82 7.82 12.27 14.39 14.79 25-89 37.21 1998 6.44 10.54 1999 55.08 Avea'age 5.61 7,59 8.49 9.22 10.12 10.70 11.38 . 12.05 13.14 14.00 1¢29 22.8-1 35.13 Stdev 3.02 3.86 4.34 4.98 5,77 6.43. 7. t2 7.12 7.90 8~21 9,40 13.99 17.97 Rec Max 21-61 24.63 25.80 28.67 33.77 37.63 42.27 42.30 44. 19 44.47 49.44 66,54 89.02 Re~ Min 1-86 2,52 2.52 2.52 2.52 3.53 3.53 3-57 3.57 3.92 4.44 6-04 11.21 Z 6.13 4.66 4.00 4.15 4.63 5.07 5-.,~) 5.17 4.86 4.54 4.37 3.82 3.71 Yvs Rec 52 52 5~ 51.. 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 50 68 CV .539 .50g .511 .5a0 .570 ,601 .626 .591 -601 386 .582 .613 .512 Reg CV .466 .482 -510 ,508 ,505 .407 .494 .485 .486 .479 .465 502 .413 P-.eg Skew 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1..1 1-0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,4 1.0 HC 1,14 1.07 1.04 t-02 1-01 1.00 I -00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RP2 5.72 7.26 7.88 8.41 9.09 9.44 10.10 10-89 11.85 12.66 1474 19.67 32.18 RP 5 8.91 11.09 IZ07 13.13 I4.50 15-41 16.68 17.45 19.13 20_23 23.49 3.267 48.75 RP 10 11.00 13.65 14.87 16.21 18.03 1931 20.92 21.60 23.72 25.01 29.01 41.51 59.21 RP 25 13-.58 16.82 18.34 20.01 22.39 24;1-2 26.09 26;60 29-27 30.78 35.68 52.58 71.84 RPS0 15.43 19.13 20.86 22.74 25.52 29.58 29.78 30.16 33.21 34.87 40,42 60.66 80.81 RP 100 17221 21-38 23.32 25.40 28.57 30.94 33.36 33-58 37.01 38.82 44.98 68.56 89.46 RP.200 18.99 2.t.58 25.73 28.110 31.55 ,3424 3683 36,90.40.69 42.65 49,40 76.35 97.83 lIP 500 21.19- 26.36 28.76 3-1.22~ 35.26 38.3.3- 41.41) 40.95 45.18 47.32 54-80 86.24 108.06 RP 11300 22-97 28.58 31.19 33.86 38.28 41.66 44-65 44.32 48.91 51.21 59.29 94.07 116-56 RP 10000 28.46 35.53 38.79 41.97 47.58 51.92 55.4I 54.48 60.17 62..~1 72.82 118.90 142.19 IDG Page 2 11/2/99 FROM LATHAM & WATKINS OC (WED)tl. 3'99 19:25/ST. 19:18/'N0. 4861487i46 F' 27 Y01 D Lyfie Creek Rainfall Depth Duration Frequency for Lytle Creek RS DWR # Y01 _5218 00 Analysis by DWR DLA Data From: Climatological Data S~. Remardmo Couaty 8am 2N/6W-26 I-atitud¢ 34.231° Longitude - 117,474' Elevation T/60 F~ Maximum Rainfall For Ind~camd Number Of Concecutive Days 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 15 20 30 60 W-YR 1931 3.60 5.09 5_27 6~2 7.67 7.85 7.85 7-85 7.85 7-85 7.85 9.99 26.80 1932 4.00 5.20 5,60 5.60 5.60-5-60 6.60 9-70 I1.15 I3.t5 13.75 20.67 36-31 1933 1934 t2,34 1935 11.21 I936 17.77 1937 ,~4.19 1938 52.68 1939 34. 16 1940 38-50 1941 28.30 1942 75.78 1943 3L 17 1944 46.82 1945 49_06 1946 40.50 1947 3ZOO 19~g 38. I 1 25.71 1949 4.57 5.12 5-41 6.59 7.14 7.17 7.17 8.17 12.01 12.01 I3.20 23.7_5 26.70 1950 4215 5A5 5.92 5.92 5-93 5.93 5-93 5.93 6.82 -fi ~ 1035 1235 26_77 1951 2_~ 252 2.52 2.52 2.52 3.57 3.57 3.57 3-57 421 4.44 6-51 14.42 1952 7,85 11.06 11.11 tt.11 t4.55 17.76 t7.81 17,8t 18.82 23.87 23.87 30.68 56.75 1953 5.44 5.44 5-44 5.44 5.44 5-44 5.44 6.09 9-04 9.04 9.73 17.94 22.85 1954 8.02 9-15 9-t5 9.15 9-15 10_55 15-18 15.18 16.46 16_46 21.80 24,20 35.82 1955 3-60 3.60 3.60 3.60 3~50 3X~fi 3.60 3.60 3.60 3-92 5.87 9-20 23.15 1956 7.70 10.01 11.93 ! t -93 I t-93 12.41 t t .93 11.93 I 1.93 11-93 13.43 27.15 23.22 1957 5.40 5.40 5-49 6.79 6.79 7.69 7.69 9.94 9.94 10.56 12.66 16,65 23-56 1958 8.11 9-33 10.43 10.78 -t0.81 10.81 13.55 13.58 15.10 16-85 21.15 36.03 56.03 1959 4.35 4~88 6.17 6,70 6,70. 6.70 10.00 11.82 12.56 12~57 12.57 16.97 19.24 1960 3 50 5.03 5.36 536 6-33 6.66 6.66 6.66 6.66 7.04 8.42 1.0.94 18,54 1961 1-86 2.77 3.11 3.53 3-53 3.53 3.53 4.84 4.84 4.84 6.07 7.60 13.09 1962 4.31 4.97 4.97 6-55 7.68 7.78 8_88 10.01 12.99 13.88 1,5_I 1 20.66 34,70 I963 5.60 5-76 5,76 5.76 5-79 5.79 5.79 5.79 6.88 6.91 6.91 10.00 17.58 1964 2.66 5.14 5-14 5.16 5.16 5.16 5.t-6 5.16 5-16 5.16 5.22 6-04 20.11 1965 2.85 5-25 6.13 6.67 9-83 9.83 7.85 11.96 12.26 12.26 12.93 13.24 22.70 1966 7.80 9-10 11.80 12.30 12,33 12-33 I6.12 20. 12 22.80 22.80 24. 15 34.04 39.14 1.967 4.55 7.69 9.29 10.82 15.37 15.37 15.37 15.58 15.64 15.69 24.15 34,04 45.83 1968 3.28 2.55 6-02 6.25 6.25 6-25 6.25 6.62 8.13 8.20 9.73 10_97 21.93 1969 21.61 24.63 25.811 28.67 33.77 37.63 42.27 42.30 44.19 44.47 49.44 66.54 74.02 1970 3.12 5-22 7,03 7.03 732 9.03 9.03 9.04 9.2I 9,21 11.1t4 14. 16 18.62 1971 4.70 6.54 6.59 6-90 7.22 7.22 7-58 7.58 7.76 7.92 15.45 15.50 24.65 1972 4.72 8.53 9.50 tt.45 12.42 14.00 13.26 15-26 15,60 15,80 15.96 16.8. t9.69 1973 8.05 10.51 11.19 11.19 11.87 12.76 13.44 ia.12 1435 16.30 18.77 28.74 44.87 1974 5.47 10.54 15.29 1550 15.50 15.50 I5.84 16.05 16.05 1631 16-69 17.68 34.63 1975 5.02 5.79 7.76 8-02 8.61 9.09 9.09 10.26 10.38 11.04 11-53 16.72 29.88 1976 4.84 6.73 7-55 9,96 11.85 13.72 13.72 13.72 13.72 13-72 18.77 19-02 29.54 1977 3.97 6.13 6.88 6-88 8.02 8.07 8.57 10.34 10-39 10.39 10.63 11.22 25.14 1978 9_20 15.82 16.40 20_18 24.11 24.16 25.33 25.33 26.57 26.57 28.49 53-57 ID,02 1979 5-6) 8.74 9.11 9.11 9.11 9At 9,11 1026 11.99 13.82 17.80 23.47 47.71 1980 6.30 9.70 14.10 17.90 17.90 17.90 17.90 17.90 17.90 24.44 26-00 43.59 50-71 IDG Page I 11/2/99 __~p.ite,,~6 L$:40 FAX 909 980 2643 DAME5 &MOORE DECLAmA,TIOI~I OF ~NBPr~V J, C,&M PBRLL, R~G-, C.II.G. o I, Anclrcw S- Campbell declare and rote as follows: | -.-n a Project [tyctrogeologist at Dan&ca Gcologicat Sciences from California polytechnic Univasity aT pomona. I am a Kcgistcrcd Oeotogtst and Certified Hydrogeologist by the Suttc of California. A current copy of my Curriculum Vitae is touched to this declaration (See Attachment 1). This declaration is madc in support of Cucamongans United for Keasonable t~xpansion ("CURI~") challenge to the Lauren Devdopmcnt residential project- I have personally observed the levee and swales below the Deer Creek Debris Basin. I have al~o revieweel City of Remcho Cucamonga Grading Plans for Tract 14771 prepared by Morse Consulting Oroup, date stamped Feb. 25, 1992. I have reviewed US Army Corps of l~ngineering Feature Design Memorandum No. 6 listing de&tin featm~ of the Deer Creek debris basin. This memorandum lists debris production at this location to be 310 me-fee from I major storm. I have calculated the volume of clcbris that could be held by the storm dmirt improvements ptarmed to run along tiae northern boundary of Tract 14771 as approximatcIy 78,660 cubic feet or 1.8 acre-feet. I made this calculation using meastffemcnt$ made from the above mentioned Crrading Plma.'~. The planned trapezoid-shaped storm dram is shown as approximately 2,020 feet tong, 3.3 feet deep, 6.0 feet wide at the bottom and 17.6 feet wide at the top. I have calculated the mmximum volume of debrb, which could be cocttalned by the lcvcc and swales on Tract 14771, as approximately 12.$4 million cubic feet or 288 acre-feet. Tables showing the deWmined results of my calculations arc srr~hed to this declaration (See Attschntent 2). The method I used to calculate 1his volume and my assumptions arc described in the following calculating the maximum potential fill voltaire which could occur on Tract 14771 as it curr~tly ~tim, I assumed debris would originate up~radient from and parallct the levee- 112 FAX 909 980 2643 D,,UIES & MOOe, E ~]002 swale system during a failure of li~e Deer Creek debris basin and severe flood conditions, Dcbri~ would fill the lows north of the leveg and rise to the elevation at the boundary of Tract 14771- As this clevsdon is kighu than the levee, it cannot be s~tstaj/!exi 8cross the eutil~ pr~rty, by wotlld slope towsrds ~he levee at the g~adica~ of the Deer Crock alluvin[ fan. I measured the slope of zhe alluvial fan to be approximately 7 degrees from the United States Geological Survey Ctwamonga Peak 7-I/2 minut~ quadxanglc. The upper sudacc.of a dobris flow would thus be defined as that elevation projecting at a 7-degree slope up from the top of the diversion levee until thc elevation reaches the elevalion at the northern boundary of. the tract. In my opinion, this is a conservative estimate of maYimtma top of the debris fill as debris coulct conceivably pile higher than this c|evation and spil! %o the north. I cons~uct~d north-south-lrendin8 ground surface elevation profiles from the northern tract boundary southward to the northeast side of the diversion levee. Profiles were cotretracted along the proposed subdivision streets, along the lo~ boundaries bcv,vcen each ~treet, and at the w~l and east botmdnry of Tract 14771. 'I constructed a total of ten profiles at a nearly tmiform spacing averaging 220 feet. t uSed the contours of existing topogtuphy on the Grading Map of Tract ~,4771 to obtain the elevations used in each profile. The ten elevation profiles ate attached to this declaration (See Attachment 2). l then constructed the line reptcscn~l~ the top of maximum potential debris f~I1 w~thin ewelee. For each pwfile, I then e, alculated the cross sectional area between the debris fill ~ine and th~ ground surf, co line using a summation of tralzzoi~ area apptoxh:ttettioM. To obtain the cross sectiorud area between the 8round surface and the fill surface, I calculated the area of ixadividual rapezoidal sl~apu formed by extending vertical lines upwards from the grouad surfac~ at ca-,h contour elevation to ~e fill line. I used the horizontal distance between conlout lines as the height of ~e Inpezoki and the d~bri8 ~hickness at each successive contour elev~ox3 as ~he ~wo =apezoid bas~s. The volume of a trapezoid is the &~,eraSe base length multiplied by the height. I then calculated the ca. oss-~ectionai area of each profile by sttmmlng the ex~as formed by the individual trapezoids. Next, [ calculated rise voltline of debris between eoch profi]~ using a'similar trapezoidal approximation. To obtain the volume of potential debris fit between eavh profile, calculated the volume of a trap8zotdal prism deftned between successive profiles. To calculate the prim volume, I multiplied the distance between each profile by the average cross sectional area of each. east and west binding profile. I ~hen calculated the 1oral 113 volume of potezttia] debris ~tl on the Ttzct by ~mming the pti~ ~ol~es ~maincd be~ ~ profile- I have compared the three voluntes calculated for I) the p!--ned storm drain (] .8 acre-feet), 2) the maximum potential debris volume conlainable on the Tract within the ]evee-swalB system (288 s~re-feet), and 3) the deSris production fi'om one major storm in Deer Cr~ck (310 acre-feet). The volume of ~h® planned storm drain is insignificm~ compared to the volume debris that could be gensated from a large storm event and the maximum volume that could be contained by The current levee-swale system. The maximum debris volume that could be contained bl~ the curr6nt levee-swals ryst~m is nearly as large (93%) as the volume of debris that could be [ene, rated by one large storm cvcn~. I d~:lare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is ~ue and cor~ct and tha! this declaration is cx¢cuu:d on September 15, 199I~, at Rancho ~onga, Califon~ia.. a~ ~. __~cRAn 1, K. O-, · - O. 114 DEBRIS PRODUCTION · RECORDED OR ESTIMATED DEBR~ kNFLOW A CONSIDERED DEBRIS BASIN o ORAINAt.~ AREA IN 5QUAI~ MILES ,, ·· 't " ·; tO MARCH 1931 3 cu~u Caeex DEBRIS INFLOWS LO~ ANGELES CORPS OF EN~INERS FILE NO, lNovember 18, 1998 correspondence from San Bernadino County Flood Control District to the City of Rancho Cucamonga- there was no cover letter] S.B,C_F.C.D. PLANNING s22 E, THIRD ST SAN 8ER>;ARDINO, C.A DEER CREEK DEBRIS DTM TO DTM VOLIJME Csa and Fill V~lumc-, Cm Vdumc Cmnula6tc DT~I 'TO D.-~TU-~I VOI.U.~iE t!t'~R-4(:!J(" I 'Oi.t :tIE POINTS 7.1.1 .MS t.¥CIRI) RI,E. I}EER{'YN. TXT DEBRIS PRODUCTION ANALYSIS TA TUM METHOD Pli(:)JECT: DEER SYSTEM NUMOER; & LNITLAL DATA (from ttydroeogy ELEVI (too of NOC) ELEV2 Coottom of NDC) ELEV3 (HYplOmefrlc index etev.) L (length of USG;S blue lines) I (length O! longest NDC) H (Ef.,EV A (I::X}AINAGE Ar~EA) = B. AOJUSTMENT FACTC)I~: PreDated by: A.ql Dare: . 09/906194 8858 FT <--INPUT 2644 FT <---INPUT 5040 FT <---INPUT 54200 FT <---INPUT 10.27 MI. 23200 FT <~4NPUT 4.39 M|. 6214 FT 2396 FT 103.749,920 59. FT. <---INPUT 2382 ACffiES 3.72 SQ. MI. a. S/oDe (H/I) ,e h. I:h'atxle Oenr~ly (L/A) = c. HVi3~ometrfc Index (h/H), d. 3441/'&3thrall, C. CORRECTION FACTORS: 14 15 FT/MI 2.76 MI/S4~ MI 0.39 FT/FT 4.40 IN <---INPUT (r-fo~t FiG. E-8) O. SIoDe (H/I) = b. ,,,,;G.,"'i~.~. L,_'I ..,m.; ,,-I,".,- · c. I-Wpsometnc ~ndex (h/H) ,= cl. 3-HR I?oinfoll = 0: OE8r;IS PfK:)DUCTrON 0.99 <---INPUt C, / ' -. ",, '5. ,:: 0.88 <----INPUT 1.00 < .... {NPUT (From Plate 6) .;T:J.. e | ":' .. ',, (FrOm PlOfe 7) (FrOm Plate 7) UNAD JUSTEO O.P. (cu. yds) (From Rate 8) INPUT---> ADJUSTED D.P.RATE J YFN? BURN 250.00O I0 VEA{~ BURN 49D00 o. I SQuare Mile (Cu. yas.) ID. Area Ad~ullrnent (cu. yas.) (From Rote 5) INPUT---> OiBIIf$ PRODUCED (cu. yclsj 1.308.000 I. 150,000 5, 134,000 Iq8.000 70.000 759,000 (acre ft.) 3,182 470 ",'&.~W ~MCED ~ Xt~e 4. ~v,r, el 03 ~ rll-~,.~.,c,v~ >lit,,J v adair I~lOr J TC LC. 3~.000 34 ,CXX) 152,000 94 EXCEL FILE: I5063A.XLS disastrous proportions. This possibility has been considered in the design of the channels." The following table displays debris production using the newest 1992 method. TABLE 1 YEAR BURN 4 YEAR BURN i0 YEAR BURN DEBRIS PRODUCTION 1,489 A.F. 764 A.F. 383 A.F. Most recent debris capacity calculation of Deer Creek Debris Basin was in October, 1994 and was 257 acre feet. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL S TA TEMENT The following information is from DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT CUCAMONGA CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES. Under Paragraph 3 Recommended Plan item f it is indicated, "Turnouts along the channel for diversion of water to spreading grounds developed by local interest." Item g discusses esthetic treatment of the project which includes landscaping and planting to screen the project structures. Right-of-Way will be landscaped with trees, scrubs, and ground cover for shade, screening and esthetic enhancement. Rest areas to be landscaped with tree clusters and betins for visual variety and to provide shade for picnickers. The debris basin outer embankment to be hydroseeded to provide grass cover. Trees to be planed along the base of the embankment. Item h covers Recreation Facilities. This section focuses primarily on Cucamonga Creek. The Creek will become the main artery connecting local and regional trails (hiking, biking and equestrian) from the San Gabriel Mountains to Prado Dam. Item h does not specifically mention Deer Creek. However, Plate 7 is a map labeled as GENERAL PLAN FOR RECREATION shows a proposed hiking-bicycle trail along Deer Creek Channel that extends from its con~uence with Cucamonga Creek upstream to about Banyon Street. Paragraph 12, SEISMIC CHARACTERISTICS. The February 9, 1971 San Fernando earthquake registered 6.6 on the Richter scale and was located 43 miles west of San Antonio Dam. The dam experienced a 0.084 g acceleration force during the earthquake. The same dam, on September 19-, 1970, Geological Society of America Reviews in Engineering Geology, Volume VII 1987 The effects of fire on the generation of debris flows in southern California Wade G. Wells II Pacl)Tc Southwest Forest and Range Expen'meni Station Forest Service. U.S. Department olAF'culture 4955 Canyon Crest Drive Riverside, Caliform'a 92507 ABSTRACT Debris flows following fire are a common, but poorly understood, problem in southern California. Research to date suggests that they result from greatly. accelerated rates of surface erosion by both wet and dry processes during the days and weeks following a fire. Significant mounts of hillslope debris are delivered to stream channels during the fire by a process called dry ravel. An important feature of postfire erosion is the rapid development of extensive rill networks on hillslopes. These rill networks are linked to a layer of water-repellent soil that forms a few millimeters below the Found surface during the fire. These rill networks result from numerous, tiny debris flows that occur on the hillslopes during the early storms. The rill networks form rapidly, often in a matter of minutes, and provide an efficient means for transporting surface runoff to stream channels. This helps explain why postfire debris flows often occur during very small storms and after short periods of rainfall. INTRODUCTION Every year southern California faces the unusual problem of debris flows from freshly burned watersheds. This problem arises from a unique comb/nation of factors involving the region's vege- tation, physical setting, and climate. First, the native vegetation, California chaparral and its associated ecosystems, is subject to periodic fires. As a given site can potentially burn every 10 to 40 years (Hanes, 1977), fires can be expected to occur somewhere in southern California almost every year. 'Second, the area is one of high tectonic activity where steep, chaparral-covered mountain slopes are drained by steep, short, bedrock-controlled channels. Finally, because of Califomia's Mediterranean climate, the peak fire season occurs immediately before the winter rainy season. Thus, it is not unusual for the early rains to fall on barren, freshly burned slopes. Postfire debris flows occur most commonly on smaller wa- tersheds. They are unusual in that they can occur in response to rather small storms and do not require a particularly long period of antecedent rainfall. They occur during the earliest postfire storms and tend to diminish in frequency as the rainly season progresses. This suggests that the debris flows are a typical re- sponse of the anique conditions of the postfire environment to the early storms. BACKGROUND A review of available literature reveals that the relationsh/p between fires and floods was recogn/zed at least by 1930 and possibly as much as I0 years earlier. Eaton (1935) was the first to recognize that these floods were actually debris flows. He dis- cussed the flooding from burned watersheds that occurred on January 1, 1934, in the towns of Montrose and La Crescenta near Los Angeles, California, and characterized these floods as a series of debris flows. From Eaton's descrilx/ons and from the published discus- sions accompanying his paper, it is evident that this phenomenon was recognized and andersuxxl by workers from the Los Angeles area, but not by those unfarnDiar with the area and its flooding problem. Three discussions that supported and elaborated on his findings were by engineers from the area (Baker, 1935; Blaney, 1935; Pickett, 1935). Most other discussions either disputed his 105 106 W. G. Wells H findings or focused on other aspects of his paper. Two foresters, Kotok and Kraebel (1935), who were closely associated with the then-recently established San Dimas Experimental Forest in Los Angeles County, were also familiar with the area and understood its flooding problems. They agreed with Eaton's views but did not call the flooding a series of debris flows. Rather, they described it as "the sequence of fire and flood." This was soon shortened to "fire-flood sequence," and because of the active research at San Dimas for the next 30 years, it became the most common term in local usage. It seems that Eaton may have been ahead of his time, or that debris flows, as a distinct phenomenon, were not widely recog- nized in the 1930s, because Eaton is rarely cited in subsequent articles on postfire flooding. In their later paper on the La Cres- centa floods, Troxell and Peterson (1937) cited Eaton's work but treated the floods as alluvial flows of water-borne debris and not as actual debris flows. Their descriptions of the flows accurately reflect what we know today about the actual behavior of debris flows, but they did not identify them as debris flows. Their exten- sive discussion of the mechanics of flow and sediment transport clearly shows that they thought they were dealing with alluvial flows and with sediment that moved as suspended and bed load in these flows. However, they also described "walls of water" 8 to 10 ft high and flows whose surface was "greatly raised in the center of the cross section." This last description (Troxell and Peterson, 1937) generally agrees with more recent descriptions of debris flows. After 1937, most of the work on postfire flooding in south- ern California was done by USDA Forest Service researchers at the San Dimas Experimental Forest. This research was guided by the philosophical concepts of soil conservation and focused on accelerated erosion after fire and on increased peak flows. A report by the Division of Forest Influences Research staff (1951 ) described dramatic increases in erosion on study plots following a fire in November 1938. The San Dimas Experimental Forest Staff (1954) also published an eyewitness account of what was certainly a debris flow that occurred during January 1954 in an area that burned in November 1953. The debris flow occurred during darkness and was again described as a debris-laden flood and not as a debris flow. Scott (1971) described the debris flows of January 1969 in Glendora, Calffomia, and, while noting that most of the moun- tain slopes above Glendora had burned in the summer of 1968, he did not make a strong connection between the fires and the debris flows. Rather, he cited the extremely large storms of that period as the principal cause of the flows. Later work by Wells (1982) suggested that large flows are more strongly linked to fires than to even the largest storms. The problem of postfire debris flows is not confined to southern California. Brown (1972) re- ported high peak flows and sedimentation rates from freshly burned watersheds in Australia. From his account, it seems clear that these were also debris flows. By the early 1940s, the connection between recent fires and flooding was clearly recognized. Rowe and others (1949, 1954) did an extensive study of the effects of fires on peak flo~s ar annual sediment production. This was a regional study that ered virtually all of coastal southern California t'rom San Lu Obispo to the Mexican border. As a result of this study th~ compiled a series of tables showing expected future peak and sediment production from burned watersheds in their stuC area. Unfortunately, this study was never published, although methodology used in compiling the tables is described in Sectic 22 of the Handbook of Hydrology (Chow, 1964). Even thoug the study dents extensively with fires and flooding, there is ever indication that the authors did not consider the flows to be debt flows or anything other than ordinary floods. RECENT DEBRIS FLOW STUDIES Work by Davis (1977) again suggests that many postfir. flows are debris flows. He analyzed the records of 12 large reset volts in the Los Angeles area and estimated the bulking ratios c sediment in their flows. He concluded that bulking ratios tende~ to remain nearly constant over a wide range of flow rates (tw~ orders of magnitude) in a given drainage. High flows tended tt carry the same proportion of sediment as low flows, and eact drainage had a characteristic bulking ratio. Davis noted that post- fire flows were an important exception to this trend. In the wa- tersheds he studied, Davis found that bulking ratios ranged frorr about 0.005 to 0.025 (0.5 to 2.5 percent sediment by volume) los normal flows. For postfire flows, he found bulking ratios of 0.4 tc 0.6 (40 to 60 percent by volume)! A connection between fires and debris flows was again demonstrated in 1978 when a debris flow was observed and photographed in a recently burned watershed near Los Angeles. California (Wells, 1981). Carter Canyon, a small (31 ha) drain- age in the San Gabriel Mountains above Sierra Madre, Califor- nia, was burned by the Mountain Trail Fire on October 23, 1978. On November I 1, 1978, a debris flow containing 500 to 700 m3 of sediment was observed in Carter Canyon during a small (38 man) storm. The flow occurred during a brief burst of heavy rainfall near the end of the storm and came down a channel in which there had been no previous flow. As it emerged from the canyon and entered a debris basin, the snout of the flow was about 2 m high and could have been described as a "wall of water." Figure I shows the actual debris flow a few seconds after it entered the debris basin. During the winter of 1978-79, Carlet Canyon was monitored, and at least two subsequent flows were identified from bank and channel deposits, although they were not actually observed. During that year, Carter Canyon produced 3,100 m3 of debris, most of it as debris flows. During the fall and winter of 1984-85, an experiment to investigate the effects of burning on small watersheds was done at the San Dimas Experimental Forest about 32 km northeast of Los Angeles, California. Four watersheds ranging in size from 15 to 30 ha were prescribe-burned on October 29 and 30. Studies of debris movement both on hillslopes and in channels were among several conducted in conjunction with the fires. Observations and FIGURE 4. Site on the right bank of the upper Waipawa River (map ref N]40:641020) with rimu estabitshed on the buried Matawhero surface and red beech growing on the Wakarara surface which became buried in 1975 with Waipawa a]]uviuL From ]975 to ]978 the channel degraded. %, ,~ 3o5 Erosion and Sediment Transport in Pacific Rim Steepl. ands. I.A.H.S. Publ. No. 132 (Christchurch, 1981) ~ome effects of brushfires on erosion processes in coastal ~uthern California wade G. Wells, II, U.S. Forest Service, 110 N. Wabash Ave, Glendora, California, U.S.A. ia)strac_.____!t. The effect of periodic brush fires in determining the ledimentation regime in the ~astal ~untafns of southem~ Calffo~ia is ~tlined. Da~ is pressted to illustrate the sed~ent discharge from ~rimental plots. The physical and ch~cal co~sition of soils ~t to b~ning is ex~ined, and linked to a h~thesis of rill lotration. Le[ sffets des feus de brousailles sur les processus d'~rosion au Bud ~e la Californie cot er I e -- E&sum~, On d~crit l'~ffet des feus de brousailles p~riodiques en ~4terminant le r~gime sedimentsire dans les montagnes coti~res au sud ~ la'Californie. On pr~sente des r~sultat5 pour illustrer le d~bit dee sediments des bassins exp~rimentaux. Le composition physique et '~himique des sols soumis au broulage est examine, et est enchaIn~ a une ,} V hypoth~se pour le formation des ruisselets. 306 INTRODUCTION The coastal mountains of southern California present an interesting sedimentation problem in that periodic brushfires appear to play a major role in the erosion processes operating on their slopes. Four factors combine to create this problem: extremely steep slopes, easily-weathered parent material, highly flammable vegetation, and the area's Mediterranean climate. This paper is primarily concerned with work that is currently in progress. Therefore, much of the evidence presented is qualitative rather than quantitative. The data which are presented are of a preliminary nature and are still inconclusive. As a result, the hypotheses presented have not been fully tested and are subject to considerable revisi0~. DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA The mountains of California's southern and south-central coast generally trend from northwest to southeast following the very active San Andreas Fault. Immediately north of the Los Angeles Basin is an area called the Transverse Ranges where the trend shifts to east-west. The information presented here is mainly from work done in one of these Transverse Ranges, the San Gabriel Mountains. These mountains lie north of the Los Angeles metropolitan area and are the main source of its sedimentation problems (Fig. 2). The San Gabriel Mountains rise to heights of about 3000 metres from a base of about 200 metres. Slopes are extremely steep, averaging 60 to 70 percent and frequently exceeding 307 100 percent. Figure 3 shows an example of these slopes in Carter Canyon near the town of Pasadena in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. The slopes in this picture actually range from 80 to 90 percent. The mountains are mostly Mesozoic granite and a complex of Precambrian igneous and metamorphic rocks. As a rule, these rocks are poorly consolidated and weather very rapidly. As a result, sedimentation rates are usually not weathering- limited, and there is always abundant sediment available for transport. Soils are shallow, very coarse textured, and rarely show any profile development. Because of this and because of the extremely steep slopes, one of the most common erosion processes is one called dry ravel. Dry ravel is simply the unconsolidated flow of dry soil particles under the influence of gravity. Many of the slopes in the area exceed the unconsolidated angle of repose for the soil on them, so that only small disturbances (even wind) are required to initiate this process. On many of the hillslopes, this process is responsible for over half of all sediment movement (Anderson et al., 1959, Krammes, 1960, Krammes, 1965). The stability of slopes in this area is largely maintained by the vegetation growing on them. Over half of the area is covered by a highly flammable complex of evergreen-sclerophyll shrubs called chaparral (Wells and Palmer- 1979). Chaparral is a vegetation type this is not only adapted to periodic fire, but is possibly even dependent on fire for its maintenance (Hanes, 1974). Muller et al. (1965) estimate that a given stand of chaparral will burn every 10 to 40 years, 308 and in southern California, many areas have burned as many 1 as five times since 1910'- The climate of the area, like all Mediterranean climates.~ is characterised by hot, dry summers and cool, wet winters. The driest months are July and August, and the period from August to November is one of hot, dry desiccating winds call~ extreme fire danger in a matter of hours. The rainy season begins in December and lasts until mid-April with January and February being the wettest months. Plants begin their spring growth about mid-February and continue through June. Thus, southern California is presented with a yearly cycle of a fire season, then a rainy season and, finally, a growing seass BACKGROUND The accelerating effect of fires on erosion rates has been recognised for more than 50 years. Records kept by the U.S. Forest Service show that studies of this problem had been proposed as early as 1927. The first quantitative study aPPe-i to be one published by Rowe et al. in 1954. Working with rainfall records and reservoir data, they concluded that sedimentation rates for large (>5 km2) catchments could be as much as 35 times normal during the first year after a fire. !' Wells, W.G. and W.M. Brown (In Preparation). Effects of fire on sedimentation processes. In Sediment Management for Southern California Mountains, Coas'~al Plains and Shoreline. EQL Rep. No. 16, Environmental Quality Laboratory, Calif- Ins: of Tech., Pasadena, Calif., appendix D (section D4). 309 They also ·concluded that these accelerated erosion rates decreased rapidly over time and returned to normal in 8 to 10 years. For smaller catchments and individual hill slopes, these rates appear to be even higher. Several unpublished reports from the files of the U.S. Forest Service show increases of over two orders of magnitude after a fire. Data from one of these reports is reproduced in Table 1 as an example. This table compares runoff and sediment delivery from two groups of 0.008 hectare plots on the San Dimas Experimental Forest near Glendora, California (Fig. 4). The Fern Canyon group consisted of three plots on a 50 percent slope facing northwest. The Tanbark group consisted of nine plots on a 35 percent slope facing east. Both groups of plots were established in 1934, and the data are for the period from October 1 1935 to September 30 1946. The Fern Canyon plots were burned on November 18 1938. The overall fire effect is evident from the data. Both sediment delivery and runoff increased after the fire, but the increase in sediment delivery is much greater. It is interesting to note that the Fern Canyon plots recovered (returned to normal) by the end of the third year. This is much sooner than the time reported by Rowe et al, (1954) and is more in agreement with the findings of Brown (1972) for burned catchments in New South Wales, Australia. He reported that recovery took from 4 to 5 years. It appears that recovery time is related to basin size. Since sediment delivery is 0CT-2'7-1999 14:35 CEENTEER FOR 1'SOTOPt' GEEOCHE REPORTS Reexamining Fire Suppression Impacts on Brushland Fire Regimes Jan E. Kee|ey,~* C. J. Fotheringham,zl· Marco Heralso.I; California shrubland wildfires are increasingly destructive. and it is widely held that the problem has been intensified by fire suppression. Reading to larger. more ~ntense wildfires. However, analysis of the California Statewide Fire History Database shows that. since 1910, fire frequency and area burned have not declined, and fire size has not increased. Fire rotation intervals have de- dined, and fire season has not changed. implying that fire intensity has not increased. Fire frequency and population density were correlated, and it is suggested that fire suppression plays a critical rate in offsetting potential impacts of increased ignitions. Large fires were not dependent on old age classes of fuels, and it is thus unlikely that age class manipulation of fuels can prevent large fires. Expansion of the urban-wi|dland interface is a key factor in wildland fire destruction. California shrublands frequently fuel massive high-inmnsity wildfires that are of increasing concern to resource managers and the public. Despite increased expenditures on fire sup- pression, each new decade experiences in- creased loss of property and tires from brush- lm~d wildfires (]). By the middle of this century, it was suggested that the problem stemmed in large part from the bttrgeoning population and poor zoning rcguh~ons alton- d:mt with urban sprawl into the foothills (2). Accepting expanded urbanization a.s the source of the wildfire problem has profound economic and political implications. An al- ternalive view to emerge in the early 1970s was that the primary problem was tied to the overly successful state and federal fire sup- pression programs. As a consequence of eliminating fires from the wildlured ecosys- tem, it has been widely held that wc have exaccrbatcd the situation by allowing unnat- ural fuel accumulation (3). Thus, when the inevitable fire docs come, it is larger and marc dcstrucUve. A computer model relating fire size to chapotto] fuel loading predicted that the prevai[ing management strategy of fire suppression in California brushlands 'U.S, Geological Survey Biological Resources Division. Western Ecol. og/ca[ Research Center, Sequoia-Kings Canyon Field Station, 47050 Generals Highway, Three Rivers, CA 93271-965L USA. ~Center far Environ- mentat Analysis-Centers for Research Exce{tence in ~ience and Technology. Department of BioLogy and MicrobioLogy. California 5tat~ University. Los AngeLes, CA 90032, USA. ~U.5. National Park Service, 5anf:a Moni¢a Nounrains National Recreation Area, Thou- sand Oaks. CA 91360, USA. · To whom correspondence should be addressed. E- maiL: jon_keetey@usgs.gov tPresent address; Ofganismic Biology, Ecology, and Evolution. University of Calilornia. Los AngeLes, CA gOOgS, USA, ::{[Pr~scnt address: Department of Geography, Univer- sity of California, ~anta Barbara. CA 93106, USA. lcads to fewer, but [argcr and more intense fires (4). A 9-year Landsat imagery record that showed that fires between 5000 and 10,000 ha were slightly more abundant in southern California than in ~jaccnt Baja California. (5) has been widely cited as support For a link between fire suppression and fire size. On the basis of this study, it has been hypothesized thut large wildfires in California shrublands arc a modern artifact. duc to fire suppression, and that they can be prevented by creation of a mosaic landscape of patches of different ages (6). The model is predicated on asser- tions that, because of fire suppression, ([) the number of tires has declined over time, (it) fires are substantially larger today than in the past, (iii) contemporary fires burn with great- er intensity than in the past, (iv) large fires result From extensive stands of very old age closes, and (v) there has been a decline in area burned, as suggested by some (3), but not all (5), studies. None of these assertions have bccn documented. To investigate historical changes in fire regimes, we used thc recently available Cal- itbrnia Statewide Fire HiStOry Database, which includes all records atom the Califor- nia Dcparnnent of For~sery and U.S. ForeSt Service and other county records (7). limited our analysis to counties dominated by shrublands with ~t stand-replacing fire gin~e: from north to south, Monterey, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Vantufa, Los Angeles, San Bcmardino, Riverside, Orange, and San Diego. Records datc from the late 19th century tbr some counties and from a.t least I910 for othcrs (8). Collectively, since 1910, there has been a highly significant increase (r2 = 0.61, P < 0.01, n = 9) in the number of fires per decade. This increase is due largely to south- em California counties, which also had siS- 510 486 7070 P.01/04 ni~cant increases in area burned (Fig. 1) (9). In no cmmty was there a significant decline in number of fires or area bumcd. All counties exhibited significant interdecadal differences in area burned [P < 0.01, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. For most counties, the 1920s and 1970s were high and the 1930s and 1960s low. Collectively, area burned was significantly correlated (r2 = 0.71, P < 0.0l, n = 9) with number of fires, which was also correlated (r2 = 0.51, P < 0.05, n = 9) with population density (t0). All counties reported very large fires flora the beginning of record keeping; indeed, one of the largest fires in Los Angeles Cottory was a 24,076-ha fire in 1878 (Fig. 2). Durin:l the 20th century, there has bccn no increase in mean fire size lbr ~ny county, but four exhibited significant declines (Fig. 2). One contributor to this decline could be a purport- ea inclination by agencies early in the century to not record very small fires (8). However, ff fires less than 100 ha in size are removed from the data set, there is stiI1 a slight down- ward trend in fire size this century (all coun- ties combined, r2 = 0.02, P < 0.001, n = 2766). Another factor that could explain a trend toward smaller mean fire size is tht: increase in human-caused (I ;) ignitions (Fig. 1), coupled with the t~.ct that many are ignited under moderate weather conditions and along toadways, factors contributing to their sup- pression at a small size (12). rfwe focus just on large fires, greater than 1000 ha, the trend toward smaller fires disappears, but still no. county had a significant increase in fire size (ranges: ra = 0.00 to 0.02, P > 0.10 to 0.99, n =. 82 to 159). The assertion that large wildfires are an artifact of modern fire sup- pression iS not snpported. ContraSting fires after 1950, when fire suppression impacts would be greatest (I3), with those in and before 1950, we see no significant change in patteru of burning (Fig. 3A); a small pcmentage of fires account for the bulk of area burned, now and in the past [10% of the fires accounted for 75% (in and before 1950) to 79% (after 1950) of the area burned], The primary change has been in the prolifcration of fires between 10 and 100 ha (Fig. 3B), reflecting both increased ignitions under moderate conditions--.that favor sup- pressiota--and increased reporting of small fires. In these brushland ccosystems, the fre- quency of small to medium size fires cannot be ~ksed to quantify the risk or largc ~rcs (t4). Contrasting fire regimes between the first and second halves of this century, we tbund that fire frequency increased m all but one county (Table 1). The majority of camales exl~ibited no significant change in mean or median fire size; however, three southern Califoruia counties had highly significant de- clines in mean fire size. Fire rotation inter- vals, the time requircd to burn the equivalent www.scfencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 284 11 JUNE 1999 182 0CT-29-1999 14:35 CENTER FOR ISOTOPE GEOCHE REPORTS 510 486 7070 P.02/04 - - 5C0 _ ~ · 50.000 - · 25.QOO - ' r~,..)- ~4" - 500 _ r ~'~' · _ ' ' - 100 r~r~}' 0.6 ~' r rt) - 0,78- · ...... · ,,~' , ....... qO 20 ~0 40 ~ 60 7O ~ gO ~0 20 30 ~ 5O 60 70 ~ gO Dacade ~de lOO. OCO Menf~'iq/San Lde= 0t34=1:~ ' _' . · ~rd~nO " r2 ' 0-C'O ', I ' · .. _ r2 - COO · : IO. C0C- ae * ' ~. '~ .t'.. · · ' ' r. ' "*Z. *A. ' I. · ' · ': ' ?¢2:' ' %~ · __..,.. -.=... ~00 - - - ~0~ - - ! ' .. ..· I , , , , , , , , , -," , , , , ', , . , , , 10Q'OOQI~tr~ Beriaar$/~entaf~ Rlvef~'~de/Onm'~' ,' - o.co , :,. ' ¢' :7" '~ ' ~o5 ':.'; '-.., 10- · ~"' . -- I ..... ' ' -,, .... , , . ~..... , , , , , , ,...~ , , ~OO.~O~~ . I '* San ~ "' · · r2k0.OOlm, i,, r~-0.02. I .. :=.;',-., room- a ~~ , o -j'e., ' '· - ...... .~ , r ........... lgOO 1930 1~O 1080 1900 1030 year yaer Fig. 1 (left). Area burned (bars) and fire frequency (circLes) by decade (1910-1990) for brush-dominated counties in centrai-eoastai and southern CaLIfornia, r is included only wen significant: *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; "', P < 0.001. FIg. 2 (right). Magnitude of Indlvidua{ fire size for records for brush-dominated counties. TaMe 1. Brush-covered area as of 1985 and Icire statistics for 1910-1950 and 1951-1997 with estimated fire rotation interval (area of brush (2Z)laverage area burned) for California counties. Trends with medians are the same for each county. Number of fires Brush County (10a ha) Before 1951 After 1950 Before 1951 M oncemy 358 102 129 1220 San Luls Obispo 250 93 119 1760 Santa Barbara 250 125 61 1622 Ventura 189 143 172 1568 Los Angeles 320 357 1392 827 San Bemardino 209 311 544 609 Riverside 290 57 613 871 Orange 42 25 48 1721 San Diego 365 456 770 939 Mean fire size (ha) Fire rotation interval (years) AFter lgSO P Before 1951 After 1950 1998 >032 115 64 2068 >0.68 60 48 2341 >o.45 47 81 1508 >O.93 121 34 360 <0,001 44 30 480 >0.33 46 37 565 <0,01 225 38 1317 >0.68 36 29 544 <0.001 35 41 office total brush arca in the county (Tablc I), declined in all but t~vo counties (/5). These f=c rotation intervals do not support the assertion that large rims derive from ancient stands of brush. To investigate the tree fire return interval, we us~ digitizcd fire maps for the Sm~m Monica Mountains in Los Angeles and Ventura counties (16). Fires in this brush- dominated range have included numerous large catas~ophic and costly fires, such as the 1961 Be[ Aim Fire or the recent 1993 Green Mc'adow Fi~e. Age clasSc~ of fuels consumed by all rims exceeding 5000 ha in the past 30 years demon- shum fixat tar~e fircs are not dependent on old classes (Fig. 4). Collccfively, there was a sig- nificant (P < 0,05 with one-way ANOVA, n = 8) diff~rencc across age claSSes, with timIs l 1 to 20 years old rapresenting 38%, which was more ~¢tn double the consumption of older age clas~ fuels. Became of the proximity of this range to urban centers, the age classes consumed may not be representative of more remote sites; howevcr, these data demons=arc th~ large cat- astrophie wildfires are not dependent on ancient st~ncLs of brush and con=adict the ~ss~rtion that yom~g s-ran& l~s than 20 years oF age prevent fire spread (5, 6). Inferences that ~reg today arc of greater intensity arc based on the assertions that fire rotation intervals have increased and fixere has been a seasonal shift toward autumn burning (6). However, rotation intervals have generally declined (Table !) and September has remained the peak month of burning throughout this century (Fig. 5). Humans directly affect fire rcgirnes in two ways: They ignite fires and they suppress fires. In brush-covered landscapes of south- em and central-coastal California, there is no evidence that fire suppression has altered the natural stand-replacing f'nre regime in the manner suggested by others (& 5). This is 830 11 JUNE 1999 VOL 284 SCIENCE www.sciencernag.org 0CT-27-1999 i4:36 510 486 ?070 P.03/04 100000 -e , B 10000 - O 1878-1950 1000 t Z> 1951-1997 o ~oSo zobo aobo 4o50 Ra~ 0~Qest to arnal~st) FIg. 3. (A) CumuLative area burned and (B) fire size dlstdbution, for at[ counties before and including 19S0 and ~fter 1950. in striking contrast to coniferous forcats throughout much of the western United Statcs, where the stand-thinning fire regime has proven amenable to near total fire ex- clusion, resulting in demonstrably hazard- omq fuel accumulation and increased poten- tial f'or catastrophic wildfires (17). The pri- mary hazard in brnshland ecosystems is the marked increase in fire frequency during the latter half of this century that often results in type conversion to nonnativc exotic grasslands (18), and fire suppression plays a crucial role in offsetting this impact. Large catastrophic wildfires in brush-cov- ered regions of California are often drivc;n by high winds, and raider these conditions even modern fire suppression techniques are inef- fective (19). Today, pcople ignite most Of these fires; however, in their absence, light- ning storms that typically occur just weeks betbre the autumn fo~hn winds (ll) would have providcd a natural sourcc of ignition. Although fuel structure is an important deter- mining thetot in fire behavior: the role of strncrure diminishes markedly under foOhn winds that can blow at speeds exceeding 100 bT~hour and arc responsible for the majori~' of arcs burned in California bntshlands (19). Under these conditions, fires readily blzm through all age classes of fiiels (Fig. 4), and thus, rotational burning programs that tempt to modify vast stretches of chaparral landscape through age class modification arc not likely to bc effective in stopping these catastropMc fir¢s. CENTER FOR I SDTOPE GEOCHE RI~PORTS 8D, .. .. ~ 30- ~0 · 70 tl~Se ~) ' "(11A24 ~) ~ nO- 20- 5 16 ~6 3~ ~ ~5 26 3~0 Fig. 4. Age classes burned by all ~res over 5000 ha from ~967 to 19~ in ~e 5anti Henlea Mountains. Indicted on the abscissa ace mid- poin~ or age cta~e$ q to 10, 11 to 20. e 31 to ~, and over 40 ~ears. Tills may come ~ welcome news to m- sottree managers because the combinatk~n of legal restrictions and filmncial constzaims makes large-scale prescribed burning of brush- land landscapes unobtainabl¢. Our results sup- port the conclusion That the most effective strat- egy (20) for reducing catasU'ophic losses from wildfires is to minim/ze the management cffort spent on the bulk of the cltaparnti landscape and focus on stntegic locations. The worst fires prcdlctably tbllow landscape features, and these patterns can be used W select buffer zones at the urbm~-wi Idland interface for more intensive ~uel management. However, the urban-wild]and in- terface is so extensive now that cvcn su'ategi- eaily ~octtsed intensive mm-lagcmenr could have enormous ecological impacts. Preference for a rural life-Style and the skyrocketing cost of suburban housing in Iarg¢ metropolitan ar- eas continue to expand the urban-wildIand interface, and of particular concern is the prediction that rural population wi}l soon exceed urban grov~th (21). References and Notes 1. T. M. gonnidcsen and R. G. Lee. J. Environ. ManeS. 8. 277 [1979), Since 1990, two brush[and fires have each exceeded Sl biUion In losses (http'.//frap,cdf. ca.{ov/projects/fire_m{mttfm_main. html}. 35 ] e -'. ~ .... 1g51-~agr 3o i 25 ~ 20 ~ i 15 - 2~j~~ < ~0- ~ i k 0 ,"'r , ~ ' r , , .I F:MAM,j JASO.%~ Fig. 5. Area burned by month for ~910-1'950 and 1951-1997, for at[ counties except River- side and San Bernardino, which were excluded because of incomplete data. Z, J. A. Zivnuska and ~ Arnold lobT. Agftc. 4. a (1950}J warned "it is known that ona of ~e significant iteM; In ~nt ~put~ioa ~anges Ms ben t~ ]nc~e in number of ~s/~nces In the I~sh-~el t~es adjacent to prtma~ wacer~cd~" 3. M, Dodge, Science 177, 139 (1972}; T, M. Bonnick- =cn, Environ. Nana9, 4, 35 (19~): H. H, Siswell, ~fescibcd Bgrning I~ ~li[ornia ~ldland ~on Management (Unlv. or Ca(ifornia P~ss, Berke- ley, 1989); 5, J, Pyne. World ~ (Hott, New York. ~995). 4. R. C. ao~erme/and C, W. Phit~ J. ~o~. 71, 6~ (1973); C, W. PhJ[po~ U,L Fom~ ~ Cen. Te~, Rep. ~-3 (197~, pp. 5. R. ~ H[nnjch, Science 21 ~. ~287 (1983), This study did ~ot deanstrata a~y ~tl~icai differences. and the mapped comped~n (Fig. ~ of that study) was bi~ed by p~sen~tion of ~o massiv~ rims (193~ and 1970) ~at were ou~lde the comparison (1972-3980) ped~ and were based on records availab(e on(y for ~hern Ca(Ifomia. More Impo~ant[y, the conc[uslen that fire suppra- sion po[Iq Is the only ~iffereace be~een southern California and aaja Californ~a h~ never been rig- orously demonstra~d and ignore landscape. mate. and land-use differences. 6, ~ A. Mlnnl~ and R, J, DenaN, In C~Zomia Wa~r- ~heds at ~e Uf6an InvOice, ~. J. ~Vri~ ~d S. C~ard, Eds. (Wa~t Re--ureas Cen~r Repe~ Unive~jty of Ca[i~mla, O~is, 1~1), pp. 67-8~: g. A, Mlnntch, in Bru~ms In Cali/om~ W/Idlers: Ecology and ~e~u~e Mana~ment, ~. ~ ~eeley and T. ko~. Eds. (Int~na~na[ ~ciatlon d WtWlife Fire, Fak- find, WA. 1995). pp. 133-158. 7. California Depa~ent of Fon~. Fire and ~smen~ Program (F~P), $~nto, CA. S~l[ fifes are not retarded: for ~mpte, ~e U.S. Fo~est SaUce r~rds only fires over 16 ha. H~cver, the th~hoid timit varies w[~ the 8. Fires ~c~ded here burned pred~l.~fly in chapa~- eel. whi~ sometimes for~ a ~gic wi~ c~astai sa~e ~crub, gBssland. oak ~[a~, and coniferous for~. Early ~n the cent, ~ere may be a deficit of small rims ~use of incompLe~ repo~n~, but arcs burned Is not Likdy ~o be sifted ~au~e fi~s are a m/no/p~6on and la~e fires are less Ilkcry ~ have been missed. 9. AdJS~nt ~unties were c~bined rot p~en~tlon purposes: ~afi~iGI tes~ dl~u~ in the ~e~ were peered on ~untics ~th se~m~ a~ ~a~ for ~he 1990 d~e ~ ~ardl~d by di- viding · e averse for ~e fi~ 8 yen by 0.8. 10. For popu~t~n densi~ starlaUd. nt ~.cen~s. ~v/populat~n/c~n¢o unt~G 1 31. ~r thee counties, n~tura[ Gghtnina~Rited fi~s ~p- kaliy ma~ up less ~an 5% of ~11 fi~s ~. L KeeWy, U.L Fom~t Se~. Ge~. Te~. Rap. P~-$8 (198Z}. ~2. M. A. ~ri~. ~coL 4ppl. 7, 1252 (199~}; P. J, Gee, th~i~ Uni~rsl~ of Cali~n~, ~dey 15. Te~niques intr~uc~ rn me 1950~ I~m~d fire suppressjan potential iS. ~. P~e et at., I~oductton to www.sciencemag. org SCIENCE VOL 284 11 JUNE 1999 18.3 14. 15. 0CT-27-1999 14:37 Wildland F[re (Wiley, New York. ed. 2, 1996)]. Addi- tionally, because of [ow ral:as of decomposlr;ion [n these ccosyst~ms, if fire suppress/on w~rc to result rn Fuel ,xcumulatian, the magn[t~Jc of thi~ impact would be cumulative with time and be greatest in the latter hatf of the century. Conqpa~e B. D. Hatamud, C. Herein, D. L Turcotte. Science Z81, 1840 (1998J. F. W, Davis and D, A, Burrows [in Path Dynamic;, $. A. Levin et al., Eds. (Springcr-Vertag, New York, 399:;l), pp, 247-2591 predicted that an~ropogeni- cai. ly driven landscape fraErr~ntatlon would Increase the fire return interval; their model is s~nsitive to ignjf~n frequency and mast appli~nble ~o central- cooroll counties. which have not experienced marked increases in fire frequency. CENTER FOR I SOTOPE GEOCHE REPORTS 16. Fires over 40 ha from 1925 to 1996: Santa Monlca Mountains Nattonal Reere~lSOn Area. U.S. National Park Service. 17. S,~tra Nevada Ecosystem Pto]ect FInal ~epott re Con- 9ros~ (Centers for Water and Wildfire Resources, Uni- versity or Ca[ifornia, Davii, 1996), voL II, pp, 1033- 1202. 18. J. E. Keeley, In North American Terrestrial Vegetation, M. G. Barbout and W. D SHt.~ngs. Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1999), pp. 201-251. 19. C. M Countryman. UJ. Forest Setv. Cen. rech. Rap. pS'W. 7 (1974). Z0. S. G. ConaN and D. ~. Weise [Tal~ Tlmb. tim EcoL Conf, Proc. 20, 342 {1998)] found no evidence that fire suppression affected rite size In the San Bernar- d[no National Forest and recommended scrateglcaBy 510 486 7070 P.04/04 placed fuel management zones in the wildLand are3s (that Is, fuel breaks) coupled with Intensive fire risk management zones to protect the wildlend-urban interlace. 21. T. D. 6tadshaw. U._~. Forest' Setv. Gen. Tee& Re, D. PSW-101 (19T7), pp. IS-25: J. B. Davis, Flte Iffana~. Notes r,O, 22 (1989). ZZ. R.. Z. Cat~aham, Callfornla'~ Shrublends (Wlklt[fe source Center Report ~c, University of California, Davis, 1985). 23. We thank C. C;tay. M. Morlt_z. end ~. Woods assistance and J. Agee, M. Botcherr. F. Davis, J. Croon- lee, C. c-kinncr, and N. Stephenson for comments. Z March 1999: accepted 4 May 1999 Positive Feedbacks in the Fire Dynamic of Closed Canopy Tropical Forests Mark A. Cochrane~'2'q* Ane Alancar,a Mark D. St-J'lUIZe,2'4 Caries M. Souza Jr.,2 Daniel C. Napstad,~'3 Paul Lefebvre,~ Eric A. Davidson~ The incidence and importance of fire in the Amazon have increased substantially during the past decade, but the effects of this disturbance force are still poorly understood. The forest fire dynamics in two regions of the eastern Amazon were studied. Accidental fires have affected nearly SO percent of the remaining forests and have caused more deforestation than has intentional clearing in recent years. Forest fires create positive feedbacks in future fire susceptibi|ity, fuel |oading, and fire intensity. Unless current rand use and fire use practices are chan~ed, fire has the potential to transform large areas of tropical forest into scrub or savanna, Fire is recognized as a historic but infrequent element of the Amazonion disturbmice regime (I, 2). Cun'endy, however, fires in AmazonSart lbrests ate frequent because of the ~ccidental spread from nearby paslums and the metcased susceptibility of partially logged or damaged forests (3-6). Here. positive feedbacks as~- elated with accidental forest rims arc report- ed; these constitute a threat to thc integrity of a large pan of the Amazonion forest. Field scudis were concentrated in d~e Tail~ndia region 0:iS. l). Ten 0.f-ha plots (eight fie-affected and two control), spread over 100 kmz, were established in 1996 to study fire impacts on forest structure, biDmass, and species composition (3). These plots were rc- consused aemr d~e dry season of 1997, during which eight of d~e plom burned to varying *Woods Hole Research Center, Post Office Box 296. Woods Hole, HA 02543, USA. qnstltuto de Homen e Mete Ambientc do Amaz6nia (IHAZON). Caixa Postal 1015. Eel6m. ParS, CEP 66017-000 Brazil stnstituto dc Pcsquisa Ambicntat da Amaz6nia, Campus do Cuam~. UFPa Avenlda Augusto Correa S/N, Caixa PoStal 860Z, Bell:m, Parb, CEP 66.075.-900, Brazil 4Department of BTolog:y. pennsylvania State Universi- ty, UnFverslty Payk, PA ~6802. USA, *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E- matt; coehrane~hre.org degrees. Fire rectLrrence, tree mortally', and biDmass combustion levels ~viffiin forest~ of different bum histories were quand~ecL in ad- dition, combustible f~el mass was assessed with the planax inmrse~ method (7) as adapted by Uhl and Kauffman (8, 9). We also examined characteristics of fires while they were occurring in four forest types (previously unbumcd, once-burned, twice- burned, and more than two previous bums) in December 1997. Direct observations of fires were made at widely scattered locations with- in a 150-km2 area south of Tail~ndia. For each observed fire, flame heights and depths (the width of the flaming front) were mea- sured or estimated (I0). The time the fireline took to move across a known distance wa~ used to calculate the rate of spread and was combined with flame depth data to calculate the average range of flame residence times at a point. Fl:une height was used as a censer~ vadve estimate of total flame length for the calculation of fireline intensity (11) because wind and slope were minimal (12), The first fire to enter a forest usually move~ slowly along the ground (Table t) and is similar to a prescribed bum (<50 kW m'l) in intensity (13). These fires consume little besides the dry leaf liner, but because of the chaxaeteristically thin tree bark [7.3 ~ 3.7 mm for >20 cm diameter at breast height (dbh) (8)] protecting the cambium tissue:s, they still kill roughly 95% of the contacted stems > 1 cm dbh. Large, thicker barked trees survive. After the fire, a rain of combustible fuels of all Sizes falls from the standing dead trees CTable I) (14). Fire damage and windthrow in these thinned forests continue to cause mortality for ~t least 2 years after the fire (4, 15). Fuel levels rise substantially and the open canopy (50 to 70% cover) allows greater solar heating and air movement to dry out the forest fuels. Previously burned forests thus become susceptible to fire during corrl- men dry season weather conditions (3). Previously burned forests were much more likely to bum than were unbumcd for- ests in 1997 (Table 1). Burned forests axe often adjacent to fire-maintained pasture and agricultural plots and are therefore frequently exposed to sources of ignition. Second fires are faster moving and much more intense. We estimate heat release (12) of <7500 kW m~ in first bums but of 75,000 kW m'a or more in subsequent burns. Because of the increased flame depth, the residence time increases spite [aster rates of spread, resulting in great- er tree mortality. Large trees have linle sua'- rival advm~tage during these more intense fires. Fire-induced tree mortality can be mod- eled as a function of bark thickness and fire residence time (16). For the observed fire characteristics and bark thickness distribution (8), no more than 45% of ~rees over 20 cm dbh are stLsceptible to fire-induced mortality in the initial fires. However, in recurrent fires, up to 98% of the trees become susceptible fire-induced mortality. The impacts of recurrent fires are much worse than those of initial rims. Higher mortal- Sty result~ in a very open canopy (10 to 40% cover), large inputs of combustible fuels, and [s~ter drying. During the 1997 fires, subarmorial amounts of carbon were released to the atmc- sphcrc, with combustion reducing oneire bit'- mass by apptoximamly 15, 90, and 140 Mg Im't in feet, second, and recurrent bums, speetively. Invading grasses and weedy vines add highly combustible live fuels to the already 832 11 JUNE 1999 VOL 284 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org TOTAL P.04 The following residents request an independent safety study, by experts in the field, to determine if it is safe to make changes to the existing levee, based on NEW facts. NAME ADDRESS /; ~ /13&9 f~ A u H f ~c , ~ 'c /c -~unv iSc C'~ - Su n c x ,6 -e,, &T ,,%nr-lsc d3~ The following residents request an independent safety study, by experts in the field, to determine if it is safe to make changes to the existing levee, based on NEW facts. NAME ADDRESS Y,4 ,., .,,--.-6. c r ,4 C t%s ,-, .~ ,--L, ..4 r ~-< qlTO / ~170[ A ( q/To/ City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary October 31, 1999 Investments Certificates of Deposit - Bank Local Agency Investment Funds Certificates of Deposit/Nag. - Bank Commercial Paper - Discount Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Treasury Securities - Coupon Mortgage Backed Securities Total Investments and Averages Cash Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Accrued Interest at Pumhase Total Cash and Purchase Interest Total Cash and Investments Total Earnings ........ Current Year Average Daily Balanc EffectIve Rat Value 5,310,532.20 12,717,963.84 1,515,000.00 2,000,000.00 72,000,000.00 66,270.18 99,609,766.22 Market Book % of Value Value Portfolio 5.310,532.20 5,310,532.20 5.34 12,717,963.84 12.717,963.84 12.78 1,515.000.00 t,515.000.00 1.52 1,979,280.00 1,970,400.00 1.98 70,630,937,50 71,970,781.25 72.32 5,965,625.00 5,973,750.00 6.00 68,635.07 62.296.35 0.06 98,187,973.61 99,520,723.64 100.00% Days to YTM 360 YTM 365 Term Maturity Equiv. Equiv. 368 157 5.102 5 173 1 1 5.139 5.210 365 275 5.730 5810 90 63 6.009 6.092 1.721 1,313 5.72t 5.801 724 475 5,452 5 527 7,636 3, 120 9.635 9.769 1,320 994 5.606 5.684 498,607.92 498.607.92 498,607.92 1 1 1.973 2.000 100,108,374.14 O~ct~ober 3! M0n.~_h__En+cll_ng_ 489, 168.86 100,643,377.87 5.72% / Date 5,163.93 5,163.93 503,771,85 503,771.85 98,691,745.46 100,024,495.49 _F_t_s__c_aJ~ear T_o Da__te_ ..... 1,955,003.04 101,054,304.08 5.74% 1,320 994 5.606 5.684 I certify that this report accurately reflects all City pooled investments and is in comformity with the investment policy adopted October 20. 1999. A copy of the investment policy is available in the Administrative Services Depadment. The Investment Program herein shown provides sufficient cash flow liquidity to meet the next six months estimated expenditures. The month-end market values were obtained from (IDC)-tnteractive Data Corporation pricing service. ~Run Date; 11/08/1999 - 12:03 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V50! Report Ver 500 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments October 31, 1999 Page2 CUSIP Investment # Certificates of Deposit - Bank 6385x1KW9 01040 6385X1NC0 01048 6509-28649 #35 0104 1 Issuer NATIONSBANK NA NATIONSBANK NA SANWA Subtotal and Average Local Agency Investment Funds Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value 03/11/1999 2,000,000.00 06/01/1999 1,500,000.00 03/16/1999 1,810,532.20 5,310,532,20 5,310,532.20 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Subtotal end Average 12,847,115.08 Certificates of Deposit/Nag. - Bank 06050EAR6 01055 NATIONSBANK NA Subtotal and Average Commercial Paper - Discount 35075RA30 1056 FOUNTAIN SQUARE Subtotal and Average 1,515,000,00 10/05/1999 1,716,154.84 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3133 t RAA3 00988 31331R DX0 00996 31331RMS1 01002 3133IRMA0 01004 31331RUG8 01022 31331RQ65 01036 31331R2Y0 01042 31331R306 01045 31331R4R3 01046 31331R7E9 01052 3133M2US4 01003 3 t 33M6N E4 01035 3133M75 D4 01038 3133M86L3 01043 3133M8878 01044 3133M94J8 01050 3133M9501 01051 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 03/27/1997 07/17/1997 0t/07/1998 01/06/1998 05/27/1998 12/15/1998 03/16/1999 04/07/1999 04/26/1999 06/21/1999 01/06/1998 12/06/1998 01/2t/1999 03/23/t 999 04106/1999 06/17/1999 06/21/1999 Market Value 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,810,532.20 5,310,532.20 Stated YTM 360 Days to Maturity Book Value Rate Moody's Equiv. Maturity Date 2,000,000.00 5.100 5.100 133 03/13/2000 1,500,000.00 5.350 5.350 217 06/05/2000 1,810,532.20 4.900 4.900 135 03/15/2000 5,310,532.20 5.102 157 12,717,963,84 12,717,963.84 t2,717,963.84 12,717,963.84 12,717,963.84 12,717,963.84 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,000,00o.00 2,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.210 5,139 1 5,139 I 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 5.730 5.730 1,515,000.00 1,515,000.00 5.730 275 08/02/2000 275 1,979,280,00 1,970,400.00 5.920 6.009 1,979,280.00 1,970,400.00 6.009 63 01/03/2000 63 1,997,500.00 2,000,000.00 6,620 6.529 1,995,000.00 1,999,375.00 6240 6.162 988,437.50 1,000,000.00 6.330 6.243 1,987,500,00 2,000,000.00 6.220 6,135 1,973,12500 1,999,375.00 6,290 6,211 1,930,625,00 2,000,000.00 5,660 5.582 2,915,625.00 3,000,000.00 5.930 5.649 1,953,125.00 1,997,500.00 5.850 5.805 3,873,750.00 3,997,500.00 5,850 5,784 1,987,500.00 2,000,000,00 6.375 6.288 988,437.50 1,000,000.00 6,230 6.145 1,925,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.530 5.454 960,625.00 1,000,000.00 5.510 5,435 2,943,750.00 3,000,000.00 5.755 5,676 1,930,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.700 5.622 2,970,937.50 2,984,531.25 6.230 0,000 1,986,875.00 1,999,375.00 6.150 6.077 877 03/27/2002 989 07/17/2002 1,163 01/07/2003 1,162 01/06/2003 1,303 05/27/2003 1,505 12/15/2003 1,597 03/16/2004 1,253 04/0712003 1,639 04/27/2004 963 06/21/2002 t,162 0t/06/2003 1,498 12/06/2003 1,542 01/21/2004 1,057 09/23/2002 1,618 04/06/2(X)4 1,690 06/17/2004 963 06/21/2002 Run Date: 11/08/1999 * 12:03 Podfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2} SymRept V501 fteporl Ver 500 CUSIP Investment # Federal Agency Issues - Coupon 3133M96K3 01053 3133M9C G5 01054 3134A1LB4 00994 3134A1 H45 01000 3134A2PN2 01030 3134A2XJ2 01033 3134A2N20 01037 3134A3NS1 01047 31364CRP5 00981 31364CJ58 00992 31364FC33 01016 31364FG96 01018 31364GBE8 01032 31364GJM2 01034 31364GTJ8 01039 Treasury Securities - Coupon 9128274M1 01026 9128275H1 01049 Mortgage Backed Securities 313401wW7 00071 31360BJ21 00203 36215WX74 00002 36215XZS4 00069 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments October 31, 1999 Average Purchase lasuer Balance Date Par Value FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN Subtotal end Average 71.970.781.25 5,973,750.00 TREASURY NOTE TREASURY NOTE Subtotal and Average FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN Subtotal and Average 63,243.03 99,396,576.40 Total Investments and Average Market Value Book Value 06/28/1999 2,000,000.00 1,980,625.00 1,996,875.00 07/13/1999 1.000.000.00 995.937.50 1.000,000.00 06/25/1997 3,000,000.00 2,999,062.50 3,000,000.00 10/22/1997 2.000,000.00 1,985,000.00 2,000,000.00 08/20/1998 2,000,000.00 1,958,125.00 2.000,000.00 11/24/1998 2.000.000.00 1,940,625.00 2,000,000.00 01/14/1999 2,000,000.00 1,948,750.00 2,000,000.00 05/0411999 5,000,000.00 4,853, 125.00 5,000,000.00 11/29/1996 2,000,000.00 1,996,250.00 2,000,000.00 05/05/1997 2,000,000.00 2,003,750.00 2.000,000.00 05/04/1998 3.000,000.00 2,958,750.00 3.000,000.00 05/t 9/1998 2.000,000.00 1,965.000.00 2.000.000.00 10/06/1998 2,000,000.00 1,935,000.00 2,000,000.00 12/01/1998 2.000,000.00 1,924.375.00 2,000,000.00 02/11/1999 4.000,000.00 3,878,750.00 3,996.250.00 72,000,000.00 70,630,937.50 71,970,781,25 08/03/1998 06/09/1999 2,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 6,000,000.00 7,204.37 50.309,99 7,733.13 1,022.69 66,270.18 99,608,766.22 1,998,125.00 3,967,500.00 5,965,625.00 7.332.90 52.337.48 7,913.31 1,051.38 68,635.07 98,187,973.61 02/23/t 987 09/15/1987 06/23/t986 05/23/1986 Page3 Stated YTM 360 Days to Maturity Rate Moody's Equiv, Maturity Date 6,480 6.428 1.701 06/28/2004 6.040 5.957 620 07/13/2001 6.630 6.537 815 01/24/2002 6.320 6.233 1,086 10/22/2002 6.050 5.967 1.388 08/20/2003 5.790 5.7t 1 1,484 i 1/24/2003 5.600 5.523 1.170 01/14/2003 5.900 5819 1.646 05/04/2004 6.230 6.145 759 11/29/2001 7.070 6.973 919 05/0812002 6.280 6.194 1,281 05/05/2003 6.125 6.041 1,295 05/t9/2003 5,670 5.592 1,435 10/06/2003 5.520 5.444 1,491 12/01/2003 5.860 5.801 1,563 02/11/2004 5.721 1,313 1,996,250.00 5.375 5.400 273 07/31/2000 3,977,500.00 5.250 5.478 577 05/31/2001 5,973,750.00 5.452 475 7,152.56 8.000 8.219 792 01/0t/2002 46,473.85 8.500 10.0t8 3.957 09/01/2010 7.626.80 8.500 8.778 561 05/15/2001 1,043.14 9.000 8.547 500 03/15/2001 62,296.35 9.635 3,120 99,520,723.64 5.606 994 (un Date: 11/08/1999 - 12:03 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2) 5ymRep! V501 CUSIP Investment # Issuer Checking/Savings Accounts 00180 BANK OF AMERICA Cash Subtoil end Average Accrued Interest at Purchase Total Cash and Purchase Interest Total Cash and Investments City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash October 31, 1999 Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value 1,246,801.47 100,643,377.87 100,108,374.14 Market Value 498,607.92 98,691,745.46 Book Value 498,607.92 498,607.92 5,163.93 503.771.85 100,024,495.49 Stated Rate 2.000 Page 4 YTM 360 Days to Moody's Equlv. Maturity 1.973 1 5.606 994 Run Date: 11/08/1999-12:03 Portfolio CITY CP PM (PRF_PM2} SymRef~t V5.01 City of Rancho Cucamonga Portfolio Management Investment Activity By Type October 1, 1999 through October 31, 1999 Page5 Beginning Stated Transaction CUSIP Investment # bauer Balance Rate Date Certificates of Deposit - Bank Subtotal 5,310,532.20 Local Agency Investment Funds (Monthly Summary) 00005 LOCAL AGENCY INVST FUND Subtotal Checking/Savings Accounts (Monthly Summary) 00180 BANK OF AMERICA Subtotal Certificates of Deposit/Nag. - Bank 14,025,370.16 2,055,607.92 Subtotal 1,515,000.00 5.210 2.000 Purchases or Deposits 192,593.68 192,593.68 2,289,000.00 2,289,000.00 Commercial Paper - Discount 35075RA30 1056 FOUNTAIN SQUARE 5.920 10/05/1999 1,970,400.00 Subtotal 0.00 1,970,400.00 Federal Agency Issues - Coupon Sales/Maturities Ending or Withdrawals Balance 5,310,532.20 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 3,846,000,00 3,846,000.00 12,717,963.84 498,607.92 1,515,000.00 0.00 1,970,400.00 Subtotal 71,970,781.25 Treasury Securities - Coupon Subtotal 5.973,750.00 Mortgage Backed Securities 313401ww7 00071 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTG. CORP. 8.000 10/15/1999 0.00 741.43 31360BJ21 00203 FEDERAL NATL MTG ASSN 8.500 10/25/1999 0.00 445.67 36215WX74 00002 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 8.500 10/15/1999 0.00 512.34 362t5XZS4 00069 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTG ASSN 9.000 10/18/1999 0.00 64.60 Subtotal 64,060.39 0,00 1,764,04 Total 100,915,101.92 4,451,993.68 5,347,764,04 71,970,781.25 5,973,750.00 62,296.35 100,019,331.56 Date: 11/08/1999-12:03 Portfolio CiTY CP PM (PRF PM3) ~;ymHept V5 01 Rhi~d VOw' 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONQA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: ]0-27-99 (99/00) RUN DATE: 10/27/99 PAGE: I VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT. 6052 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISIN~ FEE 992 VARNEY, CHUCK MILEAGE 4635 A & K PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO DEVELOPIN~ & SUPPLIES 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 7 ABLETRONICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 21659 ABSOULT FIRE PROTECTION, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 3448 ALL WELDINg MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 6226 ALLIED STORAGE CONTAINERS RECREATION REFUND 3778 ALPERT, MELANIE INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 21660 ALT COMPUTERS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 17 ALTA FIRE EGUIPMENT CO. SERVICE/SUPPLIES 5658 AMERICAN FIRST AID & SAFETY SUPPLIES 37 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PUBLIC ADMIN. ANNUAL DUES 21662 AMIR DEVELOPMENT DEPOSIT REFUND 1291 ARCUS DATA SECURITY DATA STORAGE 667 ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION VISA MONTHLY BILLINGS 26 ASSOCIATED ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 402 AUTO RESTORATORS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 1135 AUTO SPECIALISTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 4102 B & K ELECTRIC WHOLESALE 6067 BERRYMAN & HENIgAR 4441 BEST BUY CO., INC. 6355 BI-TECH SOFTWARE, INC. 21656 BIDDLECOMBE, ROBERT 41 BISHOP COMPANY 1247 BLAKE PAPER CO., INC. 4369 21661 5341 2440 5948 4949 6310 21658 2083 4735 5881 68 21655 6052 6052 5902 73 74 21657 21657 2470 BRODART BOOKS BROKEN ARROW ENTERPRISES BUCKNAM & ASSOCIATES BURRUSO, LISA C L E R C A, INLAND EMPIRE CHAPTER CLOUT CADET UNIFORM SERVICE CALIBRE PRESS, INC. CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FIN CALOLYMP IC SAFETY CARTE ORAPH SYSTEMS CENTRAL CITIES SIQN SERVICE CHAPPELL, BRENDA CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHRISTIAN BROS. HEATINg & A/C, INC. CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, INC. CITY RENTALS CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSE FOR EAP WORKSHOP RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES LIBRARY SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND CONSULTANT SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES REGISTRATION UNIFORM SERVICES REGISTRATION DUES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND ADVERTISINg FEE ADVERTISINg FEE A/C REPAIRS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES EGUIPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLIES TRAFFIC COMMISSIONERS WORKSHOP TRAFFIC COMMISSIONERS WORKSHOP VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ** CHECK~ OVERLAP 142434* 811.20- 142435 - 145172 145173* 100.00 145174 - 145176 ~ 145177 12.63 ~ 145178 896.83 145179 8.71 145180 9.25 145181 30.00 145182 3,968.23 145183 1,152.00 145184 46.31 145185 98.66 # 145186 131,40 145187 125.00 145188 2,500.00 145189 349.50 # 145190 3,358.57 # 145191 830.00 145192 147.36 145193 419.06 145194 - 145194 ~ 145195 5,186.47 145196 7,480.00 145197 53.86 # 145198 417,408.62 145199 140.25 145200 241.69 ~ 145201 197.12 145202 - 145203 # 145204 687.92 145205 57.05 # 145206 293.00 145207 43.20 145208 100.00 145209 64.00 # 145210 134.42 145211 3,890.45 145212 100.00 # 145213 575.28 145214 1,485.00 # 145215 8,054.40 145216 31.50 # 145217 1,186.20 145218 986.25 # 145219 305.00 145220 77 91 # 145221 539.15 145222 75.00 145223 75.00 145224 23.21 | L 1 l & & l i i I i 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONgA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 10-27-99 (99/00) RUN DATE: 10/27/99 PAGE: 2 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. AMT. OVERLAP 145225 145230 >]C 85 CUCAMONQA CO WATER DIST MONTHLY WATER BILLINGS # 145231 47,465.35 284 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 145232 153.19 41080 DALPAY, REBECCA RECREATION REFUND 145233 65.00 2478 DAPPER TIRE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 145234 180.99 5121 DE VOOgHT, SCOTT d. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145235 360.00 1290 DEER CREEK CAR WASH VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 145236 98.00 5171 DELLHIME, SIg REIMBURSE 145237 94.75 41081 DESTEFANO, PAULA RECREATION REFUND 145238 106.50 41082 DOUBLE D PIPELINE, INC. DEPOSIT REFUND 145239 500.00 4937 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTINg RECREATION SUPPLIES 145240 301.48 5916 ED BUILDINg MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145241 4,180.00 2422 ELECTRONICS WAREHOUSE ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES 145242 14.64 5767 ELITE PERSONNEL SERVICES, INC. PERSONNEL SERVICES ~ 145243 3,761.24 5613 EMPIRE REPROORAPHICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 145244 44.80 41083 ENTERPRISE CAR SALES DEPOSIT REFUND 145245 2,500.00 41084 EPPS, ANNETTE RECREATION REFUND 145246 44.00 41085 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF CALIFORNIA REIMBURSEMENT 145247 2,826.74 41086 FLEMINg ENVIRONMENTAL REFUND 145248 1.00 2840 FORD OF UPLAND, INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 145249 2,191.12 41087 FORD, CYNTHIA RECREATION REFUND ~ 145250 42.50 1082 FRANKLIN COVEY CO. OFFICE SUPPLIES ~ 145251 245.58 6232 gADABOUT TOURS, INC RECREATION 145252 553.50 352 OENE'S ALL COLOR PAINT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 145253 5a. 99 3388 gOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS, INC. PROFESSIONAL. SERVICES 145254 955.00 1870 OOMEZ, RICK REIMBURSEMENT 145255 119.92 650 QRAINQER, W.W. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 145256 473.05 3827 gREEN ROCK POWER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 145257 386.61 .... -"'--" 145258 - 145259 137 gTE CALIFORNIA MONI'HLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS ~ 145260 1,716.23 6277 QUZMAN, LESLIE CONTRACT SERVICE 145261 140.00 6383 H V CARTER CO. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND # 145262 600.97 462 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ~ 145263 345.06 4845 HILLSIDE COMMUNITY CHURCH MONTHLY RENT 145264 1,000.00 6252 HINCKLEY & SCHMITT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 145265 11400 32021 HOFFMAN SHEET METAL BUSINESS LICENSE 145266 26.83 158 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO., INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 145267 1,113.95 3633 HOMELESS OUTREACH PROMS & EDUCATION MONTHLY SERVICES 145268 448.00 1234 HOSEMAN MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 145269 67.37 6369 HUGHES, LASHONDAE RECREATION REFUND 145270 243.00 32023 HUNSBERQER, ANN REIMBURSEMENT # 145271 322.85 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, INC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 145272 163.28 5882 I C M A REITREMENT TRUST - 401 O1 # 145273 5,785.82 103 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEFERRED COMP 145274 871.00 4188 I D BURR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 145275 50.00 4254 IBM CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 145276 2,922.74 5682 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL gROUP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145277 39.10 4718 INLAND TOP SOIL MIXES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 145278 193.95 3452 INTRAVAIA ROCK & SAND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ~ 145279 360.00 612 JAESCHKE INC., C.R. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE # 145280 240.51 ~ CHECK~ 643 COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES ~ 157.32 · =:2<:.::: 145226 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST' OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: I0-27-99 (99/00> RUN DATEz 10/27/99 PAGEz 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARP NO WARP. AMT. 149 KING, L.D. 1024 KOCH MATERIALS COMPANY 6090 KONO, SOPHAK 1075 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 195 LANCE, SOLL ~ LUNGHARD 6395 LANDOLL, INC. 321 LANDSCAPE WEST, INC. 4755 LAPSON, KIRk 849 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 5884 LILBURN CORPORATION 4382 LITHOCRAFT PRINTERS 2048 LITTLE TIRES COMMERCIAL PLAY SYS 1455 LONG'S DRUGS 5662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTL. CO. 32015 LUNDGREN, ROE 4491 M M A S C 3987 M M A S C C/O GRADUATE CENTER FOR 32016 MACALINAO, WENDY 549 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT. INC. 32018 MERCER PRODUCTS 5587 METROLINK 4374 MOBILE STORAGE GROUP, INC. 32013 MOHR, SHANNON 842 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG. REPAIR 2248 NAPA AUTO PARTS 744 NATIONAL DEFERRED 32019 NEWPORT MEAT CO. INC. 5473 NIGHTLINE SECURITY PATROL 433 NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT 523 OFFICE DEPOT 5403 OFFICE MAX 3429 ON CALL COMPUTER SUPPLY 1948 ORACLE CORP. 5461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 5461 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 235 OWEN ELECTRIC 1441 PACIFIC BELL 1823 PAGENET 2592 PAGENTRY PRODUCTION 32014 PANTAGES, OEORGE 487 PATTON SALES CORP. 32017 PEDROZA, MARTHA 757 PEP BOYS 32020 PERDEW~ CHERYL 6205 PETERMAN LUMBER 2987 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 5597 PHOTOMAX SUPPLY CO. 32009 PICK, ANNE 255 POMA DISTRIBUTING CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAIN[ENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES AUDIT SERVICES RECREATION REFUND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REIMBURSEMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINTENANCE SLJPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES FILM PROCESSING RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION MEMBERSHIP MEMBERSHIP DUES RECREATION LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BUSINESS LICENSE RECREATION EQUIPMENT RENTAL RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE DEFERRED COMP BUSINESS LICENSE SECURITY SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · ::Z '::_' '=:Z <Z <Z MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PAGING SERVICE RECREATION EVENTS RECREATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MISC. EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS kIT MONTHLY SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP ~ 145281 6,000.00 145282 102.45 145283 480.00 145284 49.57 145285 18,401.91 145286 525.21 ~ 145287 4,228.06 145288 52.26 # 145289 322.14 ~ 145290 4,756.00 ~ 145291 3,361.80 ~ 145292 538.85 ~ 145293 31.76 145294 114.49 145295 46.00 145296 25.00 # 145297 80.00 145298 8.50 145299 4,145.75 145300 46.00 145301 3,586.00 145302 140.13 145303 40.00 145304 25.58 # 145305 398.07 145306 2,237.00 145307 12.00 ~ 145308 1,480.00 # 145309 169.44 145310 - 145310 # 145311 2,545.67 # 145312 61.38 145313 95.90 # 145314 29,135.67 # 145315 165.29 145316 - 145316 # 145317 1,171.38 # 145318 893.72 # 145319 162.73 # 145320 1,085.96 145321 7,958.11 145322 39.00 145323 8.73 145324 30.00 # 145325 47.85 145326 192.51 145327 86.20 145328 54844 145329 25331 145330 200,00 # 145331 17,579.44 l I i L 1 L t 1 1 .l l 1 1 1 CIT'Y OF RANCH(] CUCAMONOA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 10-27--99 (99/00) RUN DATE: 10/27/99 PAGE: 4 VENDOR 1049 2533 65 50 5899 251 1890 345 2705 1038 264 6334 5174 5914 276 626 4704 3188 2585 303 581 581 5029 301 214 132 5051 1105 2666 1327 317 319 135 1909 6377 1432 902 3632 4733 6225 5410 11839 836 11840 6244 11841 4448 11842 2958 NAME POMONA VALLEY KAWASAKI PRENTICE HALL PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PUBLIC RISK MANAQEMENT ASSOC. QUALITY ONE ENGRAVERS R & R AUTOMOTIVE R & R LIQHTIN9 R D 0 EQUIPMENT CO R H F, INC. R J M DESIQN GROUP, INC. RALPHS QROCERY COMPANY RAMAZON CONSTRUCTION RANCHO CUCAMONQA FAMILY YMCA REXEL CALCON ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT ROBLES, RAUL P., SR. RUSH, CHRIS RUSSELL, MEAL SAMPLES, RYAN SAN BERN COUNTY SAN BERN COUNTY SAN BERN COUNTY SAN BERN COUNTY FIRE DEPT. SAN BERN COUNTY SHERIFFS SAN BERN COUNTY SOLID WASTE MQMr SAN DIEQO ROTARY BROOM CO, INC SCHAFFER, CARL SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS INC. SIEGEL DISPLAY PRODUCTS SMART & FINAL SO CALIF EDISON CO. SO CALIF QAS COMPANY SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FED, INC SO CALIF SCHOOL BAND & ORCHESTRA SOClALTECH, INC. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON STATE OF CA, DEPARTMENT OF TRAMS STEELWORKERS OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION SUNRISE FORD SYMCAS-TSQ, INC. T & D INSTALLATIONS T.V. DOCTOR, THE TARQET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS TELEPHONE DEPOT, INC., THE TOOLS-R-US TOTALLY TOBACCO TREADWAY ~RAPHICS TRENCH PLATE RENTAL CO UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION ITEM DESCRIPTION VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINT, SUPPLIES&SERVICE MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES MAINT SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINT SERVICE&SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND PROGRAM ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PRINTS TIRE REPAIR INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION SUPPLIES MILEAQE REIMBURSEMENT ENQINEERINQ OFFICE SUPPLIES CAL-ID PROQRAM CAL-ID PROGRAM UNDERQROUND TANKS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE MAINr SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT OFFICE SUPPLIES SIGNS DAY CAMP SUPPLIES .::l<< MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS MONTHLY 9AS BILLS REQISTRATION RECREATION EVENTS RECREATION REFUND .::l.::l.!:7 MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION AUTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS MAINT SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND POLICE DEPT SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND UMP SERVICES WARR NO ** CHECK~ OVERLAP 145332 145333 # 145334 145335 145336 145337 145338 145339 ~ 145340 145341 145342 # 145343 145344 ~ 145345 145346 ~ 145347 145348 145349 145350 145351 145352 145353 145354 # 145355 145356 145357 145358 ~ 145359 145360 # 145361 145362 - 145362 # 145363 ~ 145364 145365 145366 145367 145368 - ].45371 # 145372 145373 145374 145375 145376 1453'77 145378 145379 145380 145381 145382 145383 145384 # 145385 WARR. AMT. > > Z::- 268.23 38.41 7.42 340.00 25.86 103.12 223.37 480.65 90.00 2,874.71 104.15 13,968.00 500.00 813.37 451.47 172.50 43.90 125.00 26.04 200.00 88,800.00 87.65 1,271.30 836,284.42 4,049.10 321.10 350.00 751.73 129.87 231.10 85,791.71 57.55 120.00 1,500.00 4,148.75 39,616. 4,472. 708. 35. 1,200. 27. 17. 30. 122. 273. 28. 18. 176. 3,178. 64 82 33 14 O0 50 02 16 O0 80 50 O0 40 O0 I I I 1 1 1 1 i t 1 t l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 10-27-99 (99/00) RUN DATE: 10/27/99 PA(~E: 5 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT. ~ CHECK~ OVERLAP 3437 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES ~ 145386 4,026.19 1226 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE 145387 133.58 5285 VIKINQ TIRE VEHICLE SUPPLIES 145388 193.65 1103 VISTA PAINT MAINT SUPPLIES # 145389 110.22 11843 WALKER, TERRILYN RECREATION REFUNDS 145390 50.00 213 WAXIE, KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES # 145391 188.26 4577 WELLS FAROO OUARD SERVICES SECURITY OUARD SERVICES ~ 145392 2,211.54 5176 WEST END KIDS CLUB OF THE YMCA WEST END KIDS PROORAM 145393 2,280.00 509 XEROX CORPORATION COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE ~ 145394 1,120.17 4405 YWCA OF THE WEST END RECOONITION CELEBRATION 145395 510.24 348 ZEP MANUFACTURINO COMPANY VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES ~ 145396 6892 6283 ZOLEZIO, MICKEY ROCHESTER/LARK DR RIGHT--OF--WAY 145397 390.00 TOTAL_ 1,767,113. O1 L 1 1 1 & l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 11-03-99 (99/00) RUN DATE: 11/03/99 PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ANT. 5587 NETROLZNK 11867 SHARP SEATING 3978 MUNIFINANCZAL, INC. I AA EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO-, INC. 2732 ABC LOCKSMITHS 6347 ACCURATE SMOG, AUTO, TRUCK & 5832 ACEKA PROTECTION SERVICES Z1669 ACOSTA, JUDY 6309 ADAMSON, RONALD 5231 AEF STSTEMS CONSULTING, INC. 5763 ALLEN COLLISION CENTER, JAMES 973 ALPHAGRAPHICS 6356 AMAZON.COH 2137 AMERICAN RED CROSS 21665 ANDRES, ART 5807 ARCMXTERRA DESIGN GROUP 21663 ARNOLD, RICHARD 6255 ASSZ SECURITY 2637 ASSOCIATED GROUP, THE 2902 AUOIO GRAPHICS SYSTEMS 21666 BALUTDT, HOPE 21668 BASIL, SMEILA 21667 B/LK, MAUREEN 6323 BELLSOUTH MIRELESS DATA L.P. 6461 BEST BUY CO., INC. 6355 BI-TECH SOFTMARE, INC. 1267 BLAKE PAPER CO** INC. 4833 BOOKS ON TAPE, INCo 6390 BPI COMMUNICATIONS 6369 6RODART BOOKS 21666 BROMER, OARKEN 2209 BRUCE, INGRID 5361 BUCKNAN & ASSOCIATES 5766 BUSINESS SPECIALTIES 713 CHICK°S SPORTING GOODS INC 3006 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 4119 COMPETITIVE EDGE CYCLERY 6301 COMPUSA, INC. 663 COMPUTERLAND 2Z58 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST., INC. 6907 CONTRACTORS EQUZPMENT CO. 5713 CPRS 85 CUCAMONGA CO MATER DZST Z39 0 & K CONCRETE CO 286 DAISY WHEEL RIBBON CO, ZNC 347 OAT-TIMERS, INC. 6105 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE · ~ CHECKI OVERLAP RECREATION 1653010 (<( 165302 - 165397 )>) ROSE PARADE SEATS 1653980 ARBITRAGE REBATE SERVICES 165399~ ((( 165600 - 145601 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT INSPECTION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES UNIFORN APPLICATION REFUND FIRST AID CLASS RECREATION REFUNO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEPOSIT REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO NONTHLT MAINTENANCE SERVICE OFFICE EQUXPMENT DEPOSIT REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND COMMUNICATION CHARGE OFFICE SUPPLIES REIMBURSE FOR EAP MORKSHOP RECREATION SUPPLIES LIBRART SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND LIBRARY SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND SCAG MEETING CONSULTANT SERVICES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT RENTAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPAIR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES COMPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REGISTRATION MONTHLT WATER BILLINGS STREET MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES ~FFICE SUPPLIES FINGERPRINTS 165602 165603 145404 145605 145406 165607 165608 165609 165610 165611 145612 165613 165616 165615 165616 145617 145618 145619 145420 165621 14542l 165623 1456Z6 165625 165426 1656Z7 165628 165629 165630 145631 165632 165633 145636 165635 165636 145637 165638 165439 1654~0 165661 165666 145445 145466 145667 165668 145649 3,586.00- 1,660o00 35.00 33.36 3,129.06 136.35 50.00 ZZ.Ol 3,136.00 1t050.00 4Z0.61 122.19 3,876.94 360.00 39.50 ZIO.O0 75.00 1,060.00 1,615,00 537.68 200.00 65,00 Z5,0O 3,234.81 717.29 16.00 117.00 683.69 40.00 830.63 39.50 6Z.O0 502.00 379.80 19.60 683.53 19.63 8,752.08 10,530,35 3,777.35 839.36 Z08.03 IZO.O0 30,961.46 2,328.69 41.63 136.62 32.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 11-03-99 C99100) RUN DATE: I1/03/99 PAGE: 2 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRZPTZON ~ARR NO WARR, AMT, ~ CHECKt OVERLAP 107 DETCO OFFICE SUPPLIES 165450 80.Z7 41095 DZEHL, EVANS ~ COMPANY, LLP OFFICE SUPPLIES 145451 75.00 839 DIETERICH INTERNATIONAL TRUCK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 165452 35e99 5744 DZRECTV SUBSCRIPTION 145453 27°99 61088 DOUGLASS, DONNA RECREATION REFUND 145654 45.00 6405 E H M Z SUPPLIES I 145655 549.20 41089 EARLY, MARIE RECREATION REFUND 145456 25.00 41090 ECONOMICS PRESS INC., THE SUBSCRIPTION 145457 53.56 61091 EHLENBURG, JACKZE RECREATION REFUND 145458 44.50 5767 ELITE PERSONNEL SERVICES, INC. PERSONNEL SERVICES t 145459 2,90To11 61092 EMMINGER, TESS RECREATION REFUND 145460 18.00 5937 EMPIRE FLOOR COVERING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145461 35°00 5613 EMPIRE REPROGRAPHICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14546Z 101.82 2369 ESGIL CORP. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145463 35,704,58 6914 EXCLUSIVE ENAGES OFFICE SUPPLIES 145466 26o94 41093 FAST COMPANY SUBSCRIPTION 145465 19.75 155 FZLARSKY ~ MATT MONTHLT SERVICES 145466 1,487,50 6371 FISHER SCIENTIFIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 145467 169o33 6070 GALE GROUP, THE LIBRARY BOOKS I 145468 116,38 2168 GALL'S XNC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 145669 369.57 3356 GARCIA, VIVIAN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 145470 Z3oS& 2834 GEIGER BROTHERS WEST OFFICE SUPPLIES 145471 294.17 41096 GOLDEN WEST PLUMBING INC. REFUND 145672 30°00 1245 GONSALVE$ & SON, JOE Ao LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 145473 Z,30O,O0 3827 GREEN ROCK PONER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 145476 112,64 6356 GREENHAVEN LIBRARY SUPPLIES 145475 51.07 ((( 145676 - 145477 >)) 137 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS I 145478 8e791.52 6277 GUZMAN, LESLIE CONTRACT SERVICE 165479 140.OO 1244 HAVEN BUILDING MATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 145480 60°33 Z855 HAVEN MINE t LIQUOR CO. SUB-COMMITTEE MEETINGS 145481 307°09 462 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO, EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE · 145482 Z,143o80 32028 HECKe MAREEN RECREATION 145483 192.00 3125 HX STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 145486 726.23 4726 HI-MAY SAFETY, ZNC, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 145485 165o00 158 HOLLZDAY ROCK CO., ZNC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 145686 352°28 ((( 145487 - 145488 ))) 4033 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 145489 3,215.61 3634 HOUSE OF RUTH 93/94 CDBG CONTRACT 145490 633.00 4292 HRS USA RECREATION SUPPLIES 145691 101.74 6369 HUGHES, LASHONDAE RECREATION REFUND 165492 315,00 495 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS, ZNC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # 165493 1,164.32 4]88 Z O BURR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 145696 205°59 3276 ICZ DULUX PAINT CENTERS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 145495 63,73 1218 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GROUP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 145496 196.00 6359 INLAND CARPET CLEANING RECREATION REFUND 145497 487.50 5682 INLAND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL GROUP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145498 856.00 908 INLAND HEDZATZON BOARD LANDLORD/TENANT DISPUTE RESOL. 145699 5.00 4718 INLAND TOP SOIL MIXES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 145500 219.81 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTIONS # 145501 309.92 ZZZ XNLANO VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN ADVERTISING e 145502 4,153.40 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERXOD: 11-03-99 699/00) RUN DATE: 11/'03/99 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO NARR, ANT. ~ CHECKI OVERLAP 5193 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 165503 88.4,5 3452 INTRAVAZA ROCK & SAND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14,5506 2280°00 4437 JOSSET-OASS PUBLISHERS MAINTENANCE SUPPIES 165505 67.53 524,2 JUST 4, FUN RECREATION 145506 ZZA,.O0 179 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN MEDICAL INSURANCE 165507 28e860o74 5894, KELLY, KRZSTT RECREATION 165508 34,0°00 6193 KLAMATH BAT RECREATION REFUND 145509 lw181,56 6360 KNOM ZT ALL, XNC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 165510 1e767o50 6090 KONGf SOPHAK BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 14,5511 32026 LANKFOROe CRZSTINE RECREATION 145512 65,00 849 LAWSON PRODUCTS, Z NCo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 14,5513 152,05 6327 LEWIS OPERATING CORPORATION RECREATION REFUND 145514 8,50 5884, LILBURN CORPORATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145515 1,312,00 22048 LITTLE TZKES COMMERCIAL PLAY SYS MAINTENANC~ SUPPLIES 145516 2w907.71 1455 LONG'S DRUGS FILM PROCESSING 145517 12,91 5662 LOS ANGELES COCA COLA BTLo CO. RECREATION SUPPLIES ~ 165518 236.96 2200 LOS ANGELES TIMES SUBSCRIPTION 14,5519 16,56 106Z M C Z WORLDCON TELEPHONE SERVICES t 165520 1e716o93 6603 MACE AIR CONDITIONING RECREATION REFUND 165521 Z,351.70 7164, MANELAB ROSARIO REFUND PERS DEDUCTION # 145522 115.52 6727 MARSHALL PLUMBING REHA8. PROGRAM I 1655223 2e266.09 5852 MIDWEST TAPE LIBRARY SUPPLIES t 145524 2204o91 320Z7 MOERLER, CATHERINE RECREATION 165525 60°00 2Z40 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE HAXNTENANCE # 145526 393.92 433 NZXON-EGL1 EQUZPHENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 145527 1TToZZ ((( 165528 - 165529 5223 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES t 165530 3,678,92 3629 ON CALL COMPUTER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 165531 98.92 Z35 OdEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 165532 Z.68 320Z9 PALOS VERDES LIBRARY DISTRICT LIBRARY SUPPLIES 165533 50.00 32030 PANASONZC SERVICE COMPANY SUPPLIES 165534, 4,.83 818 PARAGON BUILDING PRODUCTS ZNC. CONCRETE SUPPLIES 14,5535 106.03 320Z5 PATELe HEMANT RECREATION 165536 56.00 4,67 PATTON SALES CORP. NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 145537 156.66 5720 PERVO PAXNT CO. MAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES I 145538 2,656.01 6554, PXTASSXe PETER J. ARCHXTECTURAL PROJECT 145539 303.60 791 PHIlDELTA CARE MEDICAL INSURANCE 145560 1e167.24 395Z POMONA ZNL VALLEY CNCL OF CHURCHES WEST END HUNGER PROGRAM 165541 573.75 5177 PORT SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 165562 19255.39 5820 POSXTIVE PROMOTIONS LIBRARY SUPPLIES 145543 322,80 693 POMERSTRZDE BATTERY CO.9 INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 165566 113.80 44,01 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION, INC. EQUIPMENT RENTAL 145545 39°80 3220226 PRATe KATHY RECREATION 145566 ZOO,Off 3907 PRESORT PARTNERS PRESORT MAIL SERVICES 165547 115o2'3 3286 PRINCIPAL MUTUAL MEDICAL/DISABILITY INSURANCE 145548 76e256o226 583 PROTECTION SERVICE INDUSTRIES PROTECTION SERVICES-LIONS CNTR 145569 151.16 6607 R B R C RECREATION REFUND 145550 100o00 266 RALPMS GROCERY COMPANY RECREATION SUPPLIES I 145551 155o69 170 RANCHO CUCA ENP ACTIVITY FUND EMPLOYEE-CITY CONTRIBUTION 165552 6eO00,O0 24,96 RANCHO GRANDE KIWANIS MEMBERSHIP DUES 145553 lO0,O0 Z07 RANCHO MZNZ STORAGE MINI STORAGE t 165556 750o00 ! ! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 11-03-99 C99100) RUN DATE: 11/03/99 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO WARR. ART. ~ CHECKI OVERLAP 3811 RE-PRINT CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 165555 148.49 ((( 145556 - 145556 )>) 5618 RICHAROSe MATSONe ~ GERSHON LEGAL SERVICES I 145557 17e455061 276 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT PRINTS # 145558 587063 72Z8 ROSASt LIRIO REFUND PERS DEDUCT%ON %45559 40.79 11864 ROTARY CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMBERSHIP DUES 165560 125o00 16 ROTARY CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLXES I 165561 236.58 6142 ROYAL PIPE ~ SUPPLY MAINTENANCE REPAIRS 145562 104.95 11845 SALCEODe LOUANA RECREATION REFUND 145563 1Z050 4795 SALEM PRESSe INCo BOOK SUPPLIES 165564 337.56 Z585 SAMPLESe RYAN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT %45565 I030Z9 5538 SAN ANTONIO MATERIALS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 165566 107036 300 SAN BERN COUNTY REIM8 PARKING CITATIONS 165567 975000 300 SAN BERN COUNTY REZM8 PARKING CITATIONS 145568 67.50 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM COw INC HAZNT SUPPLIES 8 165569 599.09 1105 SEAL FURNITURE & SYSTEMS ZNC. OFFICE SUPPLIES I 145570 754.36 3896 SENECHALe CAL INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT I 165571 157.50 18Z9 SHARED TECHo FAIRCHILD TELECOMe ZNC TELEPHONE SERVICES 165571 1e483.33 13Z7 SMART & FINAL DAY CAMP SUPPLIES I 145573 83.82 317 SO CALIF EDISON CO. MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS 145576 493011 3%9 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY MONTHLY GAS BILLS I 145575 477.37. 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS t 145576 30e803006 2867 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL HGNToe INCo SERVICE AND SUPPLIES 16557Y 342050 6411 SMEET'S CLEAN SHEEP RECREATION REFUND t 165578 399100000 2366 TARGET YOUTH PROGRAM ~ DAY CAMP SUPPL # 165579 87°74 836 TARGET SPECZALTY PRODUCTS MAINT SUPPLIES 165580 1e160o01 llSl TECHNIC OFFICE SUPPLIES 165581 265,00 6351 TOBIN, RENEE RECREATION REIMBURSEMENT 165582 93o17 4351 TOBZNe RENEE RECREATION REIMBURSEMENT 145583 17.98 6378 TRIPLE A GRAPHICS RECREATION REFUND t 165586 199034°40 Z958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION UMP SERVICES I 145585 319560Z5 3437 UNZFXRST UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM 5ERVXCES t 165586 455051 47Z6 UNZSOURCE CORPORATION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES # %45587 58766079 1ZZ6 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE UPS SERVICE 145588 36.91 489 UPLANDe CITY OF MONTHLY MATER BILLING 145589 399020 478 MARREN E C0.99 CARL LIABILITY CLAIMS I 145590 598020 Z13 WAXZEe KLEEN-LINE CORP MAINT SUPPLIES I 145591 18368o50 11846 WHITE, BARBARA RECREATION REFUND 145592 65.00 5853 WIRELESS NETHORK SUPPLIES 145593 Z35089 675 WYNN'S FRDSTEMP/MAXAZR VEHICLE NAINT SUPPLIES %45596 945056 6283 ZOLEZIOe MZCKEY ROCHESTER/LARK DR RIGHT-OF-MAY 165595 676.00 TOTAL 3638792.18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: November 17, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, City Manager Lawrence I. Temple, Administrative Services Director Aooroval to Amend the City's Comoensation and Classification Plan by Deletinl~ and Replacing Certain Outdated Classifications. Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council approve the following amendments to the City's Compensation and Classification Plan: (a) Delete the classification of Disaster Preparedness Manager (salary range No. 505 to 555) and replace with the new classification of Emergency Preparedness Coordinator (salary range No. 474 to 524). (b) Delete the classification of Disaster Preparedness Specialist (salary range No. 415 to 465) and replace with the new classification of Emergency Preparedness Specialist at the same salary range. Backl~round The City's Compensation and Classification plan is embodied in a resolution approved by the City Council. Therefore, any changes to this plan require the approval of the City Council. The amendments described above are being recommended in conjunction with the administrative restructuring in the Fire District that includes the Emergency Preparedness Section. Respectfully submitted Lawrence I. Temple Administrative Services Director Agenda I THE RANCHO CITY OF CUCa~ON~ Stuff Retort DATE: November 17, t 999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUBJECt: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Joe Stofa Jr., Project Engineer ~ APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOOTHILL BLVD. MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II, DEER CREEK CHANNEL BRIDGE WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT LOCATED FROM APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET WEST OF HERMOSA AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE AND HERMOSA AVENUE NORTH TO CHURCH STREET TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 32-4637-9824 (RE: ALSO FUNDED BY RDA ACCOUNT NO. 15-51000) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of "Foothill Boulevard Median Improvements Phase II, Deer Creek Channel Bridge Widening and Storm Drain Project" located from approximately 600 feet west of Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue and Hermosa Avenue north to Church Street and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Foothill Boulevard Median Improvements Phase II, Deer Creek Channel Bridge Widening and Storm Drain Project is a joint venture with ASL Consulting Engineers; Derbish,Guerra and Associates; Caltrans and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The multi- phase project was combined into a single unit for coordination and cost saving in construction purposes. Considerable time and effort was taken in coordinating with Caltrans, San Bemardino County Flood Control District, Corp of Engineers, and the two Consulting Design Teams. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MEDIANS PHASE II NOVEMBER 17, 1999 PAGE 2 The construction project will include installing a landscape median island along Foothill Blvd., widening the Deer Creek Bridge Structure to the ultimate width on Foothill Blvd, installing a Master Plan Drainage System from the Deer Creek Channel to the Church Street\ Basin, installing a new Traffic Signal at Center Street and Foothill Blvd. and modifying the existing traffic signal at Hermosa Avenue and Foothill Blvd. to the ultimate location. This project lies within the boundaries of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Area for assistance to local businesses, thus the Redevelopment Agency will be contributing half of the costs for development. Phase I of the Foothill Blvd. Median Landscape is currently under construction with completion early 2000. The proposed Phase II will be a continuation of the project with the additional amenities. The merchants, property owners and residents in the area have been notified of the improvements and have welcomed the public improvements. When completed, the project will extend from Vineyard Avenue to Haven Avenue, including flood protection at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Foothill Blvd. The Engineer's estimate for construction of Phase II is $3.75 million. Legal advertising is scheduled for November 30 and December 14, 1999 with the Bid Opening at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, December 28, 1999. Respectfully submitted, William J O~eil City Engineer WJO:JS:dlw Attachments: Site Map Resolution /7 RESOLtrrION NO. q q q 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS PHASE II, DEER CREEK CHANNEL BRIDGE WIDENING AND STORM DRAIN PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTIN6 THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Kancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucarnonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City ofRancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Foothill Boulevard Median Improvements Phase II, Deer Creek Channel Bridge Widening and Storm Drain Project". BE IT FLIRTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, San Bemardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said the City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on December 28, 1999, sealed bids or proposals for the "Foothill Boulevard Median Improvements Phase II, Deer Creek Channel Bridge Widening and Storm Drain Project" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided forthe purpose, addressed to the City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of Foothill Boulevard Median Improvements Phase II, Deer Creek Channel Bridge Widening and Storm Drain Project". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of Califomia Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City ofRancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. /? Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City ofRancho Cucamonga, not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the pro- visions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprer/tices by the Contractor or any subcontractor finder him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to ipply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship prog.ram in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenti cable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, Califomia, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be govemed by the laws of the State of Califomia having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10% of the amount of said bid ~ a guarantee that the bidder will enter into th~ proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in eventof failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City ofRancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City ofRancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies fumished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City ofRancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City ofKancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "LICENSE" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Califomia Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and roles and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "Califomia Business and Professions Code", Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Kancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (,performance retention). The City ofRancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 17th day of November 1999. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 17th day of November 1999. William J. Alexander, Mayor ATTEST: Debbie J. Adams, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: November 30 1999 and December 14, 1999 Z/ THE P~AZ{CHO CITY 0 F CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: November 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: SUB JEff: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer · ' ' I1. ¢ , gT~E~D~RTI BIDS" FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BERYL STREET STREET REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO CIELITO STREET TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 32-4637-9518 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for the construction of Beryl Street Rehabilitation from Base Line Road to Cielito Street and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS: Beryl Street Rehabilitation scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but not limited to, excavation, saw cutting, removal of existing A.C. pavement, cold planning, crack sealing, rubberized overlay, asphalt paving, installation of curb and gutter and access ramps, re-striping and pavement markings. The project is to be fimded from Measure 'T' ftmds, Account No. 32-4637-9518. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt per Article 19, Section 15301(c) of the CEQA guidelines. The Engineer's estimate for Beryl Street Rehabilitation is $179,400. Legal advertising is scheduled for December 7, 1999 and December 14, 1999, with bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 6, 2000. City Engineer WJO: LEH: leh Attachments RANCHO CUCAMONGA (/) 6J r~, \ - -r. -- V) Z _,1 LJ-- Z rY FOOTHILL BLV y ,.. ... ....{_~,olT > > uj > ~ 1 500 C[ ~..__ - ' -- Z' Lzr ~ C3 ta III111111t1111111111 H IIIIIII~IttlIIIIITIIttHIIt II IIt111 IHII[IIIIIH~ tltHIIII!IIIt <[ N U LJ >- tY 'T' bJ (J 4TH ST ~ " II II ONTARIO 'Project x'l ~Site / NJILSEN AVE .... 24TH ST ........ ~ ,,BANYAN ST ,--- ,- .... ' ........~_ ~ SUMM ..... - ..... <z: IGHLAN BASE LINE ~]] :HURC~ ST DUTE G~ <[ BNSF RR ItHIIIIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIi IIHIIIIIIII_j I I- IF 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BERYL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION N.T.S. j RESOLUTION NO. q 9 ' 2/4/4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BERYL STREET REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO CIELITO STREET IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "BERYL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO CIELITO STREET". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figtires, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 6, 2000, sealed bids or proposals for the "BERYL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of BERYL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, -1- and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein before stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any\ subcontractor under hi.m, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is diiected to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship committee nearest the site of the public work's project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by. the joint apprenticeship committee has exceeded an average of 15 percent m the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one tO five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis state,vide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of Apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen em loyed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under Eim shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter I, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. -2- The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work herein before mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execut the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined ine~ the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit.with his Froposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City o Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least 10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the 'same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashiers' check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be 100% of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractor licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; Including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or AC-12" License (Earthwork or Paving Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code," Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE DOLLARS) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by -3- payment stipulated above, together with an additional non reimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as tsl~e% forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expen.se, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali/brnia. Dated this 17th day of November, 1999. Publish Dates: December 7, 1999 and December 14, 1999 27 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 17, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, A1CP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engiueer Lucinda Hackerr, Associate Engineer ~sp Michael D. Long, Supervising Public ector APPROPRIATE $45,833.00 AND APPROVE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR CONTRACT NO. 99-036 FOR CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING ON THE DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND THE RELOCATION OF HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BE FUNDED FROM TItE FUND BALANCE OF FUND 22 AND PLACED IN ACCOUNT NO. 22-4637-9710 RECOMMENDATION: It is ,'ecommeuded that the City Council approve Contract Change Order No. 1 for Contract No. 99-036 for constructiou surveyiug on the Day Creek Boulevard and the relocation of Highland Aveuue and appropriate $45,833.00 to cover costs of Contract Cha,~ge Order No. 1 aud the remainder of the coustrt, ction survey staking for the project to be fuuded from the fund balance of Fuud 22 to be placed in Account No. 22-4637-9710. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: During the course of coustruction, damage occurred to co,~structiou staking throughout the project due the City's coutractor, outside ageucies and private developers. The appropriate parties will be iuvoiced for the extra costs. These agencies have agreed to pay these costs. City Eugiueer W.IO:I~EH/MDL Altachment THE CITY OF I~AX~C~O CUCAMO~A SingRaft DATE: TO: FROM: BY: November 17, t 999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Phillip Verbera, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF MAP AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15282, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD EAST OF ASPEN AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY S & D RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA, LTD. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 15282, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the City Engineer to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Parcel Map 15282, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of Aspen Avenue in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on April 14, 1999 for the division of 5 acres into 4 parcels. The Developer, S & D Rancho Cucamonga Califomia, Ltd. has met all requirements established as prerequisites to the approval of the final Parcel Map 15282. C.C. & R.'s have been approved by the City Attomey. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, Wim(~j~0,~'Neil/~C'~ City ENGINEER WJO:PV:dlw Attachment PROJECT SITE LAUR FOOTHILL BOULEVARD RED OAK St CIVIC CENTER DRIVE N ARROW ROUTE VICINITY MAP NO SCALE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING D~ON ~ STAFF REPORT Ti'I'L.~ x/IGI~i'TY Iv%AP E.XHmHr]~. "4Pt ( P.r,A. 152Bzl RESOLUTION NO. q ~- O1 q S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 15282 WHEREAS, Tentative,Parcel Map No. 15282 submitted by S & D Rancho Cucamonga California, Ltd., and consisting of four parcels located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard east of Aspen Avenue being a division of five acres into four parcels was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on April 14, 1999, and is in compliance with the State Subdivision Map Act and Local Ordinance No. 28 adopted pursuant to that Act; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map No. 15282 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met by S & D Rancho Cucamonga California, Ltd., as developer; and WHEREAS, said Developer submits for approval said Parcel Map offering for dedication, for street, highway and related purposes, the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES, that the offers for dedication and the final map delineating the same for said Parcel Map No. 15282 is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. ESOLUTION q q- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 15282 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No.3B, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineers "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. EXHIBIT AS,SESSrvlENT LANDSCAPE STR, EET LIr'HTI~'r' I Ill 1"4 I EX MEDIAN DIAGRAM MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO MAINTEN ^""""' S nl T NO'S ,-,,,,,,r_. DI TR C PARCEL 3 (TPM 15282) PARCEL 2 (TPM 15282) 3B i AND 6 PARCEL 1 (TPM 15282) I ~--C, SCALE: 1'-100' LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14gFil, PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 182 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGES 90 AND 91, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STALE OF CALIFORNIA. LEGEND PARCEL ,} (TPM 15282) -- VICINITY MAP EX CURB TYP J I I "'i ' NEW PARKWAY TRFF ~20' oc (so EA) EXISllNC STREET LIGHT C.d, P.A) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDiNO STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREET LIGHTS: Dist. 5800L S1 S6 '2 9500L ~4 EXHIBIT "B" WORK PROGRAM PROJECT: PARCEL MAP 15282 NUMBER OF LAMPS 16,000L 22,000L 27,500L LANDSCAPING: Community Equestrian Trail Dist. D.G.S.F. L3B Turf Non-Turf S.F. S .F. ASSESSMENT UNITS: Existing items installed with original project. Assessment Units By District P~cel Acres S1 S6 L3B 1 0.7 1.4 0.7 0.7 2 0.7 1.4 0.7 0.7 3 1.3 2.6 1.3 1.3 4 2.3 4.6 2.3 2.3 Trees Ea. 30 Annexation Date: November 17, 1999 Form Date 11/16/94 RANCHO CU ENGINEERING Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJFk'~: . CAMONGA DEPARTI&ENT November 17, ~ 999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TERRA VISTA PARK IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT 15072, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ROCHESTER AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD, SUBMITTED BY KAUFMAN AND BROAD OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security related to Tentative tract Map No. 15072 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map No. 15072, generally located at the southwest comer of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, was approved by the Planning Commission on the 24tn day of Jtme, 1998, for a residential subdivision of 545 single family lots on 90 acres of land in the Low Medium Residential Designation within the Terra Vista Community Plan. The five acre public park site improvements is one of the conditions of the map approval The Developer, Kaufman and Broad of Southern Califomia, Inc., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Labor and Materialmen Bond: $782,000 391,000 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TRACT 15072 NOVEMBER 17, 1999 PAGE 2 Copies of the agreement and security signed by the Developer are available in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully Submitted, Will~Nei~?(l'~ City ENGINEERING DIVISION WJO:dlw Attachments V It;IFII I · Ma&r" BASE[ UNE[ ROAD ...,/. CITY OF I:tANCHO CUCAMONGA  !~'/"~:~,. COUNTY. OF SAN BEP, NAIRDINO :( STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE Cl:rY OF 9, A~'C~rO DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 17, 1999 Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL TO AMEND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM D-8 RESOLUTION NO. 99-247 The Resolution title to City Council agenda item D-8, Resolution No. 99-245, is worded incorrectly. The title should be-amended to read as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TERRA VISTA PARK IMPROVEMENTS, RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15072 WJO:HM:dlw RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TERRA VISTA PARK IMPROVEMENTS, RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 15072 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15072, submitted by Kaufinan and Broad of Southern California, Inc., consisting of 545 lots, generally located at the southwest comer of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, was appmved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on June 24, 1998; and WHEREAS, Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc., desire to commence construction of the park at Terra Vista Parkway and provide an Improvement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security, by Kaufman and Broad of Southern Califomia, Inc., as developer; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Tentative Tract Map No. 15072. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest. SOLUTION NO. q q' 2 q 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PARK SECURITY FOR ALL INTERIOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS AND SIGNALIZATION, RELATED TO TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 150'/2 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 15072, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southem Califomia, Inc., consisting of 545 lots, generally located at the southwest comer of Rochester Avenue and Base Line Road, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on June 24, 1998; and WHEREAS, Kaufman and Broad of Southem California, Inc., desire to commence construction OF THE PARK AT Terra Vista Parlway and provide an Improvement guaranteed by acceptable Improvement Security, by Kaufman and Broad of Southem Califomia, Inc. as developer; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Tentative Tract Map No. 15072. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City Clerk to attest. THE CITY OF I~NC~O CUC~ON~ St tffReport DATE: TO:. FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 17, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Rick Gomez, AICP, Community Development Director Dave Bierins, Public Works Maintenance Manager APPROVAL TO ENTER INTO AN ACCESS AND LICENSE INDEMNITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND COX COMMUNICATIONS PCS, LP, A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ALLOWING COX COMMUNICATIONS AND THEIR CONSULTANTS ACCESS TO HERITAGE PARK TO CONDUCT TESTS TO DETERMINE THE FEASIBILITY OF INSTALLING WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the Access and License Indemnity Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cox PCS, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership, for the purpose of allowing Cox Communications and their consultants access to Heritage Park to conduct tests to determine the feasibility of installing wireless communication facilities and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: Cox Communications is in the process of negotiatingwith City Staff a third ground lease agreement for the installation of wireless communication facilities located on City, RDA or Fire District property. Previous agreements for facilities at the Epicenter overflow parking lot on Rochester Avenue east of the Epicenter and at Fire District Operations offices on Amethyst noah of 19th Street were approved by the RDA and Fire Boards. Thos prior agreements have resulted in a successful business relationship with Cox Communications. The current agreement, it is hoped, will result in satisfactory test results allowing for installation of a new facility at Heritage Park. RG:DB:dlw THE C ITY OF R~Tc~o C~C~uO~{~A SmffRg DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 17, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Dale Catron, Facilities Supervisor APPROVAL TO AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR CITY-WIDE FACILITIES, TO COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, IN THE AMOUNT OF $171,720 TO BE FUNDED FROM FUND 01-4648-6036. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award and authorize the execution of the contract for janitorial services for city-wide facilities, to Coastal Building Services of Fountain Valley, in the amount of $171,720 to be funded from fund 01-4648-6036. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids wcrc solicited, received and opened on October 28, 1999, for the subject project. Staff has reviewed all bids and found Coastal Building Services to be the lowest responsive bidder. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Ncil City Engineer WJO:DB:jau Attachment JANITORIAL BID SUMMARY / RFP 99-00-007 / NOVEMBER 1999 COASTAL ED' S ROGAN EMPIRE BELL GRACE BUILDINGS BUILDNG BUILDINGS BUILDING BUILDING BUILDING SERVICES MAINT. SERVICES MAINT. MAINT. MAINT 171,720.00 192,784.80 225,561.72 331,538.28 191,744.41 213,420.00 144,438.00 146,872.80 210,263.90 187,358.88 141,508.49 161,700.00 UNITED MAINT SYSTEMS 157,716.00 138,396.00 TOP ROW; FULL SERVICE PROPOSAL SECOND ROW; MODIFIED SERVICE PROPOSAL . APPARENT LOW FULL SERVICE PROPOSAL - COASTAL BUILDING SERVICES · APPARENT LOW MODIFIED SERVICE PROPOSAL - BELL BUILDING MAINTENANCE * UNITED REJECTED RANCHO CUCAMONGA EI~GIIXEEI~II~ DEI'~RTMEI~T Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 17 ,' 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL AND EXECUTION BETVVEEN THE STATE OF OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT CALIFORNIA (STATE), THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (AUTHORITY), THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (CITY) AND THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (COUNTY) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SEGMENT 5 OF STATE ROUTE 30 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve cooperative agreement between the State of California (STATE), the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (AUTHORITY), the City of Rancho Cucamonga (CITY), and the County of San Bernardino (COUNTY) for construction of Segment 5 of State Route 30 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) being the County Transportation Authority (AUTHORITY) is required to improve transportation services as set fodh in the Measure I expenditure plan. Included in this plan is the construction of State Route 30 in the County of San Bernardino. In construction of State Route 30, the AUTHORITY contractors will be doing work in STATE, CITY, and COUNTY right-of-way. The four-way cooperative agreement between SAN BAG (AUTHORITY), STATE, CITY, and COUNTY sets forth the responsibilities at each party. After completion of Segment 5, our City agrees to: Accept control and maintain at our expense, the portions of PROJECT lying outside STATE's right-of-way and within CITY right-of-way. Also, we will maintain, at our CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RT. 30 SEGMENT 5 - COOPERATIVE AGMT. NOVEMBER, 17, 1999 PAGE 2 expense, local roads within STATE's right-of-way delegated to CITY for maintenance, and remaining portions of any local road overcrossing structures, including th~,,.deck surface and above, as well as all traffic service facilities that may be required for the benefit or control of CITY street traffic. Reimburse STATE for'our proportionate share of maintenance costs for traffic control signals, including emergency preemption equipment and internally illuminated street name signs and safety lighting within STATE right-of-way and CITY limits. Such share to be an amount equal to 50% of total maintenance costs, including electrical energy costs. Furnish emergency preemption equipment and internally illuminated street name signs for traffic signals to be installed within STATE right-of-way and CITY limits, and any future replacement, emergency preemption equipment and internally illuminated street name signs, for traffic signals, as required. The Cooperative Agreement requires SANBAG's contractors to name the CITY as additional insured, and it indemnifies the CITY for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to be done by AUTHORITY for any work delegated to AUTHORITY. The agreement also states that STATE, AUTHORITY, CITY, and COUNTY shall cooperate on issues concerning the State Route 30 Project not covered by said agreement. Respectfully Submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:MO:sd Attachments RESOLUTION N' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BEI'VVEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (STATE), THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (AUTHORITY), THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (CITY) AND THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO (COUNTY) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SEGMENT 5 OF STATE ROUTE 30 IN THE CITY OF RANGHO GUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, STATE, CITY, COUNTY and AUTHORITY, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 130, are authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement for improvements to State highways with a portion within City of Rancho Cucamonga in San Bernardino County, and a portion within the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved Measure I on November 7, 1989, which provides funding for transportation projects and programs throughout the County of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, AUTHORITY is required under its ordinance to improve transportation services and facilities as set forth in the Measure I expenditure plan. The expenditure plan includes a project to construct State Highway improvements consisting of a six-lane freeway, two HOV lanes, and an undercrossing structure at Rochester Avenue, an interchange at Day Creek Boulevard, traffic signals, and appurtenant improvements on State Highway Route 30 in the County of San Bernardino, referred to herein as "PROJECT"; and WHEREAS, AUTHORITY desires to prepare the contract documents and advertise, award and administer the construction contract for PROJECT in order to bring about the earliest possible completion of PROJECT; and WHEREAS, CITY is agreeable to AUTHORITY's proposal to prepare the contract documents and advertise, award and administer the construction contract for PROJECT; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto intend to define herein the terms and conditions under which PROJECT is to be constructed, financed and maintained; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has for its consideration and execution said cooperative agreement addressing liability issues during construction and covering issues such as accepting control and maintenance of portions of the PROJECT constructed outside of STATE's right-of-way, local roads RESOLUTION NO. ROUTE 30 SEGMENT 5 - COOPERATIVE AGMT. November 17, 1999 Page 2 within STATE's right-of-way delegated to CITY for maintenance, operation and maintenance of traffic signals for the benefit or control of CITY street traffic, emergency preemption equipment and illuminated street name signs; and WHEREAS, to assist STATE and AUTHORITY in construction of Segment 5 of State Route 30, it is in the best interest of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to enter into said cooperative agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Approve the execution of the agreement between the STATE, AUTHORITY, COUNTY and the City of Rancho Cucamonga concerning construction of Segment 5, State Route 30 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Authorize the Mayor to sign said Agreement and direct the City Clerk to attest the same. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: November 17, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supervising ACCEPT THE FOURTH STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT, FROM 370 FEET WEST OF SANTA ANITA STREET TO 1600' EAST, CONTRACT NO. 99-021 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $229,692.05, APPROPRIATE $5,772.64 FROM THE FUND BALANCE OF FUND 10 TO BE PLACED IN ACCOUNT NO. 10-4637-9707, AND APPROVE CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. I RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that tile City Council appropriate $5,772.64 from tile fund balance of Fund 10 to be placed in Account No. 10-4637-9707, approve Contract Change Order No. I and accept the Fourth Street Rehabilitation Project, from 370 feet west of Santa Anita Street to 1600' east, Coiltract No. 99-021 as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, retain the Faithful Performance Bond, to be used as the Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $203,563.10 six nmnths after the recordation of said Notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $ $22,969.20, 35 days after acceptance. Also, approve the final coiltract amount of $229,692.05. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: TIle subject project has been completed in accordance with tile approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $229,692.05, which includes one contract change order in the amount of $12,473.28 for additional earthwork. The original amount approved by Council was $223,919.41. Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO: LEH/MDL: Is RESOLUTION NO. 9 9 ' 2 t-{ q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOURTH STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT, FROM 370 FEET WEST OF SANTA ANITA STREET TO 1600' EAST, CONTRACT NO. 99- 021 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Fourth Street Rehabilitation Project, from 370 feet west of Santa Anita Street to 1600' east, Contract No. 99-021, has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager FROM: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer BY: Linda R. Beek: Jr. Engineerfl SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE AND MAINTENANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 97-11, LOCATED AT 12550 ARROW ROUTE, SUBMITTED BY AIRE LIQUIDE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for MDR 97-11, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance and Maintenance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of MDR 97-11, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The street improvements have been completed and It is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance and Maintenance Bond. Developer: Aire Liquide 12550 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Cash) $54,150.00 Accept: Labor & Material Bond (Cash) $27,100.00 Respectfully submitted,~ William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:ls Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 9 5~ ' Z 15 O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR MDR 97-11, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREA.S, the construction of public improvements for MDR 97-I 1, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: November 17, 1999 Mayor and. Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. EngineercZ/~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT A SURETY RIDER, REDUCING THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND FOR TRACT 15875-1, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD, SUBMITTED BY KAUFMAN AND BROAD OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. RECOMMENDATION: Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. has submitted a Surety Rider for Tract 15875-1, reducing the Faithful Performance Bond. It is recommended that the City Council accept said Surety Rider. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract 15875-1, located on the northeast comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc. was required to submit Faithful Performance and Labor and Material Bonds. An error was made in computing the amount of the Engineer's Estimate that the bonds were based on. They are requesting that the bonds be reduced to the corrected amount. Original Faithful Performance Bond: $5,736,000.00 Accept Rider Reducing Faithful Performance Bond: $3,404,300.00 Respectfully submitted, William J. O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:Is Attachments THE RANCHO CITY 0 F CIICA~ON~A St3f:fReport I I DATE: November 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ! Inspector77~~ ACCEPT THE FY 1998/99 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION- OVERLAY, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 99-041 AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHOR|ZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $246,547.08 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the FY 1998/99 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation- Overlay, Various Locations, Contract No. 99-041 as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of $246,547.08, retain the Faithtiff Performance Bond, to be used as the Maintenance Bond, authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $266,086.15, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $ $24,654.71,35 days after acceptance. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $246,547.08, whicl~ includes no contract change orders. The original amount approved by Council was $292,694.77. Respectfully submitted, W~a~mJ.O"Neil City Engineer WJO:LEH/MDL 5/ RESOLUTION NO. (~ q' ~ 5 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE 1998/99 LOCAL STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION-OVERLAY, VARIOUS LOCATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 99-041 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF ~C NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Street Pavement Rehabilitation-Overlay, Various Locations, Contract No. completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and the 1998/99 Local 99-041, has been complete. WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bemardino. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 17, 1999 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: BY: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek,' Jr. Engineer -~ SUBJECT: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND, FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT MAP 13565-6 AND -7, SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION, LOCATED AT TWENTY-FOURTH STREET AND SAN SEVAINE AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: The required improvements for Tract Map 13565-6 and -7, have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: As a condition of approval of completion of Tract Map 13565-6 and -7, located at Twenty- Fourth Street and San Sevaine Avenue, the applicant was required to complete street improvements. The improvements have been completed and it is recommended that City Council release the existing Faithful Performance Bond. Developer: Standard Pacific 1565 West MacArthur Boulevard Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Release: FaithfulPerformance Bonds: 11133341310 11133341344 11133172756 11133172764 $108,050.00 $311,140.00 $427,000.00 $149,000.00 City Engineer WJO:LRB:ls RESOLUTION NO. q9- Z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 13565-6 AND -7 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tracts 13565-6 and -7 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and complete. WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. HILLSIDE HILLSIDE WILSON BANYAN ,., · . efh 61h 1 4th ONTARIO TRACT 13565 -6 & 7 SUMMIT VICTORIA FONTANA THE CITY OF RANClIO CUCAMONGA EXHIBIT N ORDINANCE NO. 611 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-01, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND SOUTH OF THE INTERSTATE 15 FREEWAY AND WEST OF EAST AVENUE FROM MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND FOR APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, 550 FEET NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, FROM LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 1100-031-08, 1100-061-02 THROUGH 04, 1100-071-01 AND 02, AND 1100-151-01 AND 02 RECITALS. 1. Overland Company has filed an application for Etiwanda Specific Amendment 99-01 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Etiwanda Specific Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 22, and continued to September 29, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 3. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. ORDINANCE. Council of the NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: Ordinance 611 Page 2 a. The application applies to two areas, each with approximately 20 acres of land. Area 1 is basically a linear configuration which flanks the south side of the Interstate 15 freeway with frontage on East Avenue and is presently vacant. Area 2 is basically a rectangular configuration, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard and is presently vacant. Said properties are currently designated as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), respectively; and b. The properties to the north of the subject sites are designated freeway and Low-Medium Residential, and contain a freeway and vacant land, respectively. The properties to the west are designated freeway and Low-Medium Residential, and contain a freeway and vacant land, respectively. The properties to the east are within the City of Fontana and are vacant. The properties to the south are designated Low-Medium Residential and Commercial, respectively, and contain vacant land and a residence, a retail store, and vacant land, respectively. c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area. A Low-Medium Residential designation is proposed in Area 1, consistent with the other Low-Medium districts abutting the Interstate 15 Freeway in the Etiwanda Area. The proposed Low-Medium designation was shown in the Master Plan for approved Tentative Tract 15711 to depict circulation and a potential subdivision design. A Medium Residential designation is proposed in Area 2 adjoining a commercial corridor to provide support for businesses, public transit, and to create viable activity centers. Area 2 is shown on the Etiwanda Specific Plan Concept Plan of "Relative Land Use Intensities" as an appropriate site for higher land use intensities because of the proximity to major traffic and commercial corridors. The proposed Medium designation Ordinance 611 Page 3 in Area 2 is consistent with the existing property lines and contains ample frontage along Etiwanda Avenue, with secondary access available to the north in approved Tentative Tract Map 15711. The property configurations in Area 2 provide opportunity for a coordinated, appropriately designed Medium density project compatible with the nearby Foothill Boulevard commercial corridor; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The General Plan currently designates Area 1 as Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Area 2 as Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre). The proposed project exchanges land use designations of two undeveloped 20-acre sites. This equal exchange of land use designations is intended to be "density neutral" with no changes in the number of dwelling units designated for the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and c. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Ordinance 611 Page 4 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 99-01, a request to change the Etiwanda Specific Plan Land Use Map for approximately 20 acres of land south of the Interstate 15 Freeway and west of East Avenue from Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and for approximately 20 acres of land on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue, 550 feet north of Foothill Boulevard, from Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) as shown in the Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor A'!'I'EST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Ordinance 611 Page 5 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 3'u day of November, 1999, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day of November, 1999. Executed this 18th day of November, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Ordinance 611 Page 6 ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN : =_-j,:-. sct.x~ OS omn ,Sfmce LM .' ~, , i ~' figure OFRCIAL 5-1 , ~ND USE MAP PROPOSED LAND USE E~'k;t>,'+ "A" REVISE~t / ORDINANCE NO. 612 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02, A REQUEST TO REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 A. RECITALS. 1. Griffin Industries has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low- Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: Ordinance 612 Page 2 a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 18.5 acres, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped. Said property is currently zoned as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to General Plan Amendment 99-05A and Development District Amendment 99- 03, which re-designate the subject site to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and related development; and e. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial Area Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: Ordinance 612 Page 3 a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 removing 18.5 acres of land located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue from Subarea 16 in the Industrial Area Specific Plan, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor Ordinance 612 Page 4 ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby cedify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 3'd day of November, 1999, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day of November, 1999. Executed this 18th day of November, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk FIG. IV-18 SU AF A Revised: 11120195 Ordinance 612 Page 5 CIRCUt. ATJON TRAILS/ROUTES ~ t20' R,O.W. O O O O I~edestrian ~- · qae Cre4ks & t ~oo' e.o.w. · · · · BioyeJe lr of less R.O.W. ~ Regiofill ~ pirkI IkitI-Uso RAIL SERVICE [ I Bfldfe ~ Sixolal Streetscape/ i I I I I Ezistlng I ~ LlndscmPbtV ! I I; # I i ! Proposed .,,~ Access PoMts (~ Millet Plan 0 400' 800' Note: isubarea 5 Parcel lines end lot cefif~watk~ns are shown ms approximation my. tThe sites slHiwn may net ~e cvffeotty eweted etef is ~ ~cat~ sits s~ific. The b~t~ el a die Is an l~Ieat~ of I ~o~ctld lut~l md ~l my N M~lled Mf tN ms IM Cily ~k EXHIBIT "A" ISPA ORDINANCE NO. 613 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-03, A PROPOSAL TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR APPROXIMATELY 18.5 ACRES OF LAND FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-31 A. RECITALS. 1. Griffin Industries has filed an application for Development District Amendment 99-03 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereina~er in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low- Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05A and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and also to remove said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05A and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and also removed said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 6. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. O~inance 613 Page 2 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 18.5 acres, with a rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 18) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 18) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre)and is currently vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99- 05A and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-02; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: Ordinance 613 Page 3 a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendmentwould not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05A. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Development District Amendment No. 99- 03 to change the zoning designation for the subject property to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Please See the Next Page for the Formal Adoption and Official Signatures Ordinance 613 Page 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTEDthis17thdayofNovember, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABST~NED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 3rd day of November, 1999, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day of November, 1999. Executed this 18th day of November, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Ordinance 613 Page 5 ';. '....' · ZL6'~:H~: "' :!: ""':;:" `':= ; ~ "' --~ ~ '~';"". ".' ~',;:;.., .'- '.=. ......= . .,. .:. ;,..'-'- · , ),, .. . ' "' "~ "" "' ':"";""..-'.;-:--'.':-;.;-'~i~ ~ ':'L""';(:: '~ -it----1 ~ll ' " .". ~'-'~ .."4 TH_ S__T':. ._. . ...... , L_ '__' '* .t,.' .,~.~ :' "'"II.'mr',:e.,- , ~__~:me 4 l e I I ! t I I II ! ! mmmmm~ ·. . . .-;:._. ,;~....: ..:.i~i:::.-.=~.;-:..:;:....~-;.;.. ;:,-: .-.-~.~ .<. :.; '.,:;.:.= ...,.. · RESIDENTIAL SPECIFIC PLANS ! vL I VERY LOW/2 DU/AC Eem~i~i:"INDUSTRI~,L SPECIFIC PLAN EE. SpI I L ! LOW 2-4DU/AC :mm~.~ll ETIWANDA,SPECIFIC Pt~N F S.P FOOTHILL SPECIFIC PLAN · I LM I LOW-MEDIUM 4-a DU/AC · - · · . ' , m---mmm I M I MEDIUM a-~4 DU/AC t MH J MEDIUM'HIGH 14-:~4 DU/AC ! ~ I HIGH :4-~0 DU/AC ,,. EXHIBIT "A" DDA 7/ ORDINANCE NO. 614 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-03, A REQUESTTO REMOVE TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 0.7 ACRE FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 Am RECITALS. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low- Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: Ordinance 614 Page 2 a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 0.7 acre of land, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and are presently improved with residential structures. Said properties are currently zoned as Industrial Park (Subarea 16)in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject parcels is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16)in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4- 8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is currently vacant; and c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Development District Amendment 99- 04, which re-designate the subject parcels to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and related development; and e. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial Area Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: Ordinance 614 Page 3 a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 removing two parcels totaling 0.7 acre of land located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue from Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor Ordinance 614 Page 4 ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 3rd day of November, 1999, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day of November, 1999. Executed this 18th day of November, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk FIG. IV-18 Ordinance 614 Page 5 -SUE AF SA S Revised: 11/20195 6th 4th _1 _1 CIRCtJLAllO, TRALS/IIOVTES 120' ;I.O.W. O O O O I:~estdma abe' · ,ram C~,is · Channels 100' ILO.W. · · · · 8iWele Ir at less II.O.W. ~1"I ~ ~ Multi-Use Pet t ! I Existing I I BIMII ~..liaeee:~ SINmMI St;,eetsliellmI Mallet PIle nAiL lEtVICE Illll 0 400' 8~' Note: Parcel bee end lot eoelkFafatioe$ 1The dles shewe may he1 I~e ¢keteelty ewhed net 6s ~ MIt~ die ~tf~. T~ MtM ~ a die I$ an ~ll~ el 8 ~t~ lame ~ tMI wy ~ EXHIBIT "A" ISPA ORDINANCE NO. 615 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 0.7 ACRE IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-28 AND 34 Ae RECITALS. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development District Amendment 99-04 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low- Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and also to remove said properties from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-03 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and also removed said properties from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 6. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. 77 Ordinance 615 Page 2 B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels of land totaling approximately 0.7 acre, with rectangular shapes, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue which are improved with residential structures, Said properties are currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject sites is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is currently vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05B and Industrial Area Specific Plan 99-03; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject properties are suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and Ordinance 615 Page 3 c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05B. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Development District Amendment 99-04 to change the zoning designation for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Please See the Next Page for the Formal Adoption and Official Signatures 77 Ordinance 615 Page 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 3rd day of November, 1999, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day of November, 1999. Executed this 18th day of November, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Ordinance 615 Page 5 RESIDENTIAL I VL I VERY LOW.=2 DU/AC I L i LOW 2-4 DU/AC · I LM ! '. LOW-MEDIUM 4-8 DU/AC I M I MEDIUM 8-14DU/AC I MN I MEDIUMS-HIGH 14-24 DU/AC I H I- HIGH 24-30 DU/AC SPECIRC PLANS ,. Immmmel' IE.SJa · i,,,~,i ETnNANDA SPECIFIC PLAN F S.P FOOTHILL SPECIFIC PLAN-' Immmmm EXHIBIT "A" DDA ORDINANCE NO. 616 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 99-04, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 1.6 ACRES OF LAND FROM SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 210-062-10 Am RECITALS. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low- Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 4. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: Ordinance 616 Page 2 a. The application applies to 1.6 acres of land, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is presently improved with residential structures. Said property is currently zoned as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is currently vacant; and c. The application is part of a series of applications relating to General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Development District Amendment 99-05, which re- designate the subject parcels to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre); and d. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and related development; and e. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and f. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and b. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and will not result in any internal inconsistences with the General Plan, Development Code, and Industrial Area Specific Plan and would not have significantly greater impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties than would be expected under the existing land use designation. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: Ordinance 616 Page 3 a. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflects the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 removing from Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, 1.6 acres of land located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue, as shown on the attached Exhibit "A". 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 17th day of November, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: William J. Alexander, Mayor Ordinance 616 Page 4 ATTEST: Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 3rd day of November, 1999, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day of November, 1999. Executed this 18th day of November, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk FIG. IV-18 Ordinance 616 Page 5 SU AR A Revised: 11120195 Z 6th :L.~ ,,::.: ......L.. 4th ClRCt~ATKN 1~0' R.O.W. 100' I!.O.W. Ir M less II.O.W. RAIL SEIIVIC:~ I I J I J Existing tilldill 0 40~' lOO' 160~' Note: Proreel ~i!, . ~ su area 5 , ~, . 1The sites shown fray net be currently erareed not is the leoorion e4ts s~eilk. TN ~t~ ol a ~te Is an ~lt~ el I ~o~ted letwe ~ tMI my ~ ~ml~ w t~ ms t~ ~ty ~k EXHIBIT "A" ISPA ORDINANCE NO. 617 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-05, A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DESIGNATION FOR A SINGLE PARCEL 1.6 ACRES IN SIZE FROM INDUSTRIAL PARK (SUBAREA 16) IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN TO LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4-8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED BETWEEN FOURTH AND SIXTH STREETS ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 210-062-10 RECITALS. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has filed an application for Development District Amendment 99-05 as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential development and was certified by the City Council on November 20, 1996. The Environmental Impact Report analyzed the impacts associated with the conversion of the entire block from Industrial Park to Low- Medium Residential. 3. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommended approval of the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue; and also remove said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 4. On October 13, 1999, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. 5. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved the associated General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04 to change the Land Use Map from Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) for the property located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue; and also removed said property from the Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 16). 6. On November 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. Ordinance 617 Page 2 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. ORDINANCE. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on November 3, 1999, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a single parcel of land totaling approximately 1.6 acres, with rectangular shape, located between Fourth and Sixth Streets on the west side of Archibald Avenue and is improved with residential structures. Said property is currently designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan; and b. The property north of the subject site is designated Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Low- Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and is to be developed with the Cucamonga Cornerpointe residential project. The property to the east is designated General Industrial (Subareas 4 and 5) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is improved with industrial uses. The property to the south is designated as Industrial Park (Subarea 16) in the Industrial Area Specific Plan and is currently vacant; and c. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-05C and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 99-04; and d. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Development Code; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this City Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land uses in the surrounding area; and Ordinance 617 Page 3 b. The proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and c. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan by the adoption of General Plan Amendment 99-05C. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. The Negative Declaration does not identify any significant environmental effects that will result if the project is approved. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon the substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3, and 4 above, this City Council hereby approves Development District Amendment 99-05 to change the zoning designation for the subject properties to Low-Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre), as shown on the attached Exhibit "A." 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. Please See the Next Page for the Formal Adoption and Official Signatures Ordinance 617 Page 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTEDthis17thdayofNovember, 1999. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ATTEST: William J. Alexander, Mayor Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 3rd day of November, 1999, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 17th day of November, 1999. Executed this 18th day of November, 1999, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Debra J. Adams, CMC, City Clerk Ordinance 617 Page 5 T q~.. ~ .,' :': -:._-..,, .'=,' . .'. ': ",""' """"' '7" "=': ":'=__:i TM .. =""' '¢=.... · . :.', -. . '.: .- ':.." i!' ':' ':" -'--==="."~' '.-= 'C;C~: ~1~'. ,"" :"'~ ""':""'" 2'..-... · ' "' "' .'-' ';' "" """ .... I,' ..· .~ %.".":" .. ~j, ..... .,. ,. - :... _. ,,....-:-:., ..:..'.:,;... .<.: .,- ;':;-:- .... RESIDENTIAL SPECIFIC PLANS iI~l.mmml' - I VL ! VERY LOW z2 DU/AC ~s~r'Smm~i:'!NDUSTRI),L SPECI'FIC PLAN IF_SpI m L ~ LOW 2-4 DU/AC ees~ma;;.~i ETIWANDA SPECIFIC P!,~N -{ LM { . LOW-MEDIUM 4-e DU/AC · F. SJ,. · FOOTHILL SPECIFIC PLAN. . ~ M I MEDIUM e- 14 ott/Ac I MH J MEDIUM-HIGH 14-24 DU/AC I . ! HIGH 24-30 DU/AC EXHIBIT "A" DDA ~/ RANCHO C COMMUNITY UCAMONGA SERVICES DATE: TO: SUBJECT: November 17, 1999 Mayor and Members of the City Council Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAFTER 1204 OF TrT1.E 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LEAS~ AREAS IN PUBLIC PARKS AND A[:X:)P'RNG REGULATIONS APPUCABLE THERETO; AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A LEASI-K)FT]ONAL AREA FOR DOGS WITHIN A CITY-OWNED PARK RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached ordinance and resolution providing for the development and operation of an off-leash dog area within the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City Council has previously approved use of the northwest corner of Etiwanda Creek Park as an off-leash dog area. As part of that approval, the City Council required the Members of R.C.-S.P.O.T. (Rancho Cucamonga - Socializing Pets and Owners Together) to raise the required funds and install the necessary improvements. The group is actively fundraising for the initial phase of the improvements which will include the fencing necessary to open the park. R.C.-S.P.O.T. is hopeful that the park will be open by the end of the year. The existing municipal code section governing the use of City parks prohibits dogs from being off-leash within the parks. In order to allow off-leash dog area(s) within City parks it is necessary to amend the municipal code to allow for areas to be designated as off- leash dog spaces. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFF-LEASH DOG AREA ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION November 17, 1999 Page 2 The attached ordinance is presented for first reading and will make the necessary changes to the municipal code to allow off-leash areas. Included within the ordinance are those off-leash facility regulations which have been discussed and agreed to with representatives of R. C.-S. P. O .T, Also attached is a resolution which specifically designates the northwest corner of Etiwanda Creek Park as an approved off-leash dog area. In the future, if the City Council decides to allow additional off-leash areas these can be added by designation in a resolution. City staff is currently completing the preparation of an agreement with R.C.-S.P.O.T. identifying the responsibility of the City and R.C.-S.P.O.T. with regards to facility development and operation. It is expected that the proposed agreement will be presented to the City Council on December 1, 1999, for consideration along with the second re ding of the attached ordinance. //p///,Ily su '~ ctor KM/mam Attachments Council&Boards/Staffreports/Offleashorclres. 111799 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA AMENDING CHAPTER 12.04 OF TITLE 12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGAMUNICIPAL CODE, PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LEASH-OPTIONAL AREAS IN PUBLIC PARKS AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS APPLICABLE THERETO. A. Recitals. (i) The City Council has heretofore determined that the establishment of designated leash-optional areas for dogs within public parks will more fully serve the recreational needs of City residents owning dogs. (ii) The City Council has further determined that the establishment of leash-optional areas will provide a substantial benefit in the form of exercise and social interaction for dogs and their owners. (iii) The City Council has heretofore studied the most appropriate means by which to establish leash-optional areas within the City. In conjunction with one or more groups of local residents, the City Council has developed suitable parameters governing the establishment, operation and maintenance of leash- optional areas and one or more of said groups have indicated willingness to provide necessary funding therefor. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ordains and finds as follows: Section 1. In all respects as set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance. Section 2. Section 12.04.020 of Chapter 12.04 of Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "12.04.020 ExemPtions. "A. The provisions of subsection A.1 of Section 12.04.010 of this chapter, requiring all dogs to be on- leash while in public parks within the City, and any similar requirement contained in the City's animal control regulations, shall not apply to the following: 991101 11231-00001 sjk 1950593 agency. "1. Any dog used by a law enforcement "2. Any dog while participating in a formal dog obedience training program, or any dog participating in a dog show or other program expressly permitted or sponsored by the City. "3. Any dog within a posted leash-optional area of any City-owned park, as established by resolution of the City Council provided, however, that nothing herein shall relieve the owner or person having charge, custody, care and/or control of such dog from the responsibility to maintain proper control over the dog. Furthermore, nothing herein shall be construed as relieving such person from any liability for any damages arising out of his or her use of a leash- optional area. In order to be subject to the exemption set forth in this subsection 3, all persons must comply with all requirements of law and the following rules and regulations when utilizing any leash-optional area: (a) No dog is permitted in a leash-optional area except when in the care, custody and control of a person at least thirteen (13) years old. Any person under thirteen (13) years of age must be accompaniedby and be under the direct supervision of an adult. No person may have more than two dogs in a leash-optional area at any one time. All dogs must be under the voice control of their caretakers at all times. Dogs are permitted in a leash-optional area between dawn and dusk only. (b) All dogs must be at least four months of age, vaccinated for rabies, and currently licensed by the City's animal control authority. No dog that is sick, in heat, injured, under four (4) months of age, or which displays aggressive behavior toward other dogs or humans is permitted in any leash-optional area. Food or treats for dogs may not be brought into any leash-optional area. (c) Any person having care, custody or control of a dog in a leash-optional area shall quiet or remove the dog if it barks and shall promptly remove and properly dispose of any waste deposited by such dog. (d) No animals other than dogs are permitted in any leash-optional area. Dog obedience classes may not be conducted in a leash-optional area without a 991101 11231-00001 sjk 1950593 - 2 - permit having first been obtained from the Community Services Department. (e) The use of a leash-optional area shall constitute an agreement by any such dog owner or person having the care, custody or control of the dog, to strictly follow the rules in this Section 12.04.020A.3 and to assume all risks and to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, including its elected officials, officers and employees, with respect to any liabilities, claims, injuries or other damage to persons or property arising out of or connected with such person's use of the leash-optional area. "B. The provisions of subsections C, F and G of Section 12.04.010 shall not apply to City employees who are engaged in the performance of their duties." Section 3. Section 12.04.050 of Chapter 12.04 of Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "12.04.050. Violation--Penalty. "A. Any person engaging in any activity declared unlawful by subsections B, J and/or N of Section 12.04.010 is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished as set forth in Section 1.12.020 of Chapter 1.12 of Title 1 of this Code. "B. Any person violating any other provision of this Chapter 12.04 including, but not limited to, violation of any rules applicable to use of leash-optional areas, shall be guilty of an infraction, punishable as set forth in Section 1.12.030 of Chapter 1.12 of Title 1 of this Code." Section 4. Civil Remedies Available. The violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall constitute a nuisance and may be abatedby the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances. Section 5. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalidby any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. 991101 11231-00001 sjk 1950593 Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this , 1999. day of MAYOR I, Debbie Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of 1999, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the Cit~ Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 1999, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: CITY CLERK 991101 11231-00001 sjk 1950593 - 4 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A LEASH- OPTIONAL AREA FOR DOGS WITHIN A CITY-OWNED PARK. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves as follows: Section 1. In accordance with the authority set forth in Section 12.04.020 of Chapter 12.04 of Title 12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council hereby establishes a leash-optional area for dogs and their owners which shall be located within Etiwanda Creek Park. The specific location of the leash-optional area is more fully set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. The provisions of this Resolution shall become effective as of the effective date of Ordinance No. provided that one or more signs giving notice of the leash- optional area and that use thereof is subject to established regulations, have been posted so as to be conspicuously visible by users of such area, and further provided the established area has been caused to be enclosed by the City. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 1999. ADOPTED and APPROVED this day of MAYOR 991101 11231-00001 sjk 1950594 I, DEBRA J. ADAMS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the day of , 1999, and was finally adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 1999, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga 991101 11231-00001 sjk 1950594 - 2 - ,/ / CITY COUNCIL PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE November 17, 1999 program in traditional costume and provided Spooktactular entertainment. This scary event was co-sponsored by the V.I.P. Club. A special Veteran's Day Tribute was offered at the Senior Center on Wednesday, November 10th at 10:30 a.m. This event honored those brave men and women who served in our Country's armed forces. There was special WWII entertainment and the Armed Forces Medley performed by an outstanding ensemble group. Refreshments were also available. The 'Crafty Seniors' Craft Show was held at the Senior Center on Thursday, November 4m from 9:00 to 11:30 a.m.. This annual event provided a special opportunity to purchase beautiful and creative crafts made by our seniors. Their creations make wonders holiday gifts at affordable prices. · A free 10-week Theatre program for seniors was introduced at the Senior Center in October. The purpose of this program is to produce a one-act play at the end of the 1 O-week program. The Senior Advisory Committee did not meet in October because the majority of the members attended a funeral of a Senior Center member. Their next meeting will be held on Monday, November 22"a at 9:00 a.m.. Youth Activities: Playschool continues to expand and add classes. Over five hundred (500+) children are enrolled in the program this year. The Fabulous Fours and Fives classes alone has two hundred and twenty (220) children enrolled (compared to one hundred and eighty (180) children last year). New classes are being added in the evening, that when full, would bring capacity close to six hundred (600) children between the ages of 1 and 5 attending our City sponsored Playschool classes. The annual Pumpkin Carving Workshop was held on Saturday, October 29th. Approximately fifty (50) children and their parents artended and had fun carving up pumpkins to take home for the Halloween weekend. Our Breakfast with Santa special event is scheduled for Saturday, December 4~h at the Senior Center. Attendance at this fun-filled event is expected to reach three hundred (300) children and parents. The morning features breakfast, provided by the Rancho Grande Kiwanis, entertainment, crafts, and a visit with Santa. The Teen Center at the Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center held a Halloween Monster Bash on Friday, October 29a'. Over one hundred and fifty (150+) youngsters joined the ghosts and goblins for a spooktacular night of dancing. -3- CITY COUNCIL PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE November 17, 1999 Friday continues to be the most well attended day at the Teen Center each week. The Center is open on Fridays from 2:30 until 9:00 p.m.. Staff is working with the local schools to give out free day passes in the hopes of increasing attendance at the Center. The Teen Center hosts an exciting special event on the 4th Friday of each month. Upcoming events include an Athletic/Academic Decathlon in November and a Pool Tournament in December. The Teen Recreation Activity Club (TRAC) is in full swing for Fall. TRAC worked hard at the Founders Day Parade and Celebration that took place on Saturday, November 13'h. They operated a snack bar, as well as, a cotton candy booth where they distributed free cotton candy to those redeeming their coupons that they received along the parade route. TRAC members also carried the Founder's Day Parade banner that led off the Parade. · TRAC is also having continued success with their Night on the Town Babysitting Program, which operates twice per month at Lions Center East. The 3rd Annual College Fair, that was held on October 21s', was a resounding success. Approximately sixty (60) colleges and universities from around the Country were represented. Lewis Retail generously donated a large storefront for the event. The event was planned in collaboration with our three local high schools. The College Fair Committee met regularly to plan the event and has decided to add another event to their calendar, a spring Career Fair. Youth Sports: Pee Wee Soccer continues through mid-November. There are approximately four hundred (400) three to five year old boys and girls participating. Pee Wee Deck Hockey began in mid-November. Approximately two hundred (200) three to five year old boys and girls are expected to participate in this fun activity at the R.C. family Sports Center. · Youth Roller Hockey continues through January. Over two hundred forty (240+) boys and girls are participating on twenty-six (26) teams. · Youth Basketball registration continues through mid-November. Over one thousand (1,000+) children are expected to participate in this popular program. The Sports Advisory Committee met on Wednesday, November 10* to review the staff recommendation for the Spring/Summer field allocation for the time frame of February 1 -July 31, 2000. -4- CITY COUNCIL PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE November 17, 1999 R.C. Family Sports Center: · Youth Indoor Soccer has one hundred sixty (160) boys and girls, ages 6-17, participating on sixteen (16) teams. · Youth Indoor Volleyball has forty (40) girls, ages 10-13, participating on three (3) teams. · The Full Court Adult Basketball program has one hundred twenty (120) men participating on twelve (12) teams this season. · Sixty (60) men are participating on twelve (12) teams on the Three-on-Three Basketball Leagues played on Sunday mornings. · Adult Racquetball Leagues have twelve (12) players participating in two (2) singles leagues. · Over eighty (80+) men and women are playing on ten (10) teams in the Adult Volleyball Leagues. · Jazzercise continues to be popular with eighteen (18) classes being offered each week. · Organized Play Youth Basketball classes had (60) sixty boys and girls, ages 6-12, participated this past session. · The Family Sports Center continues to be busy. During the month of October 1999, facility usage for open/drop-in play was as follows: Adult Basketball- 285; Youth Basketball- 390; Adult Racquetball- 348; Youth Racquetball- 45; Adult Volleyball- 78; and Youth Volle. yball- 101. Adult Sports: · Adult Softball has over two thousand sixty hundred seventy-two (2,672) men and women participating on one hundred sixty-seven (167) teams. · Twenty-me (29) men and women are participating in three (3) Adult Tennis Leagues this season. · Adult Flag Football and Soccer begin play in mid-November. Over forty (40) teams are expected to participate. Trips and Tours: · Universal Amphitheater - "Rockettes" , Tuesday, December 21. The Universal Amphitheater will showcase the famed Rockettes performing special holiday dances. These long-limbed -5- CITY COUNCIL PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE November 17, 1999 beauties from Radio City Music Hall show off the intricate routines and eye-catching kicks that has made them a legend in the world of dance. (Seats available) Metrolink to the Rose Parade, Saturday, January 1. The world famous Rose Parade will be even bigger and better in the new millennium. Ride the Metrolink uain to Arcadia and then board buses that will take us to our grandstand seats on Colorado Blvd. Cost is $7S per person and includes the tram ride, grandstand tickets, and a box lunch. (Sorry, trip is sold out.) Human Services: St. Bernardine Medical Center held two new free health seminars at the Senior Center in October. The first session was an Orthopedic Seminar. It covered the causes, symptoms and treatment of injuries and wear and tear disorders, the different causes of arthritis, knee, hip and morning stiffness, as well as the latest in non-surgical treatments, new arthritis medications and advanced physical therapy. The second session was a Heart Seminar. This seminar covered the latest diagnostic methods, new medicines, non-surgical treatment, dizziness/shortness of breath and much more. No Senior Crime In '99. This is an ongoing series of monthly crime prevention workshops presented by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department that focuses on senior's issues and concerns. The final workshop this year was on Home and Auto Security and was held at the Senior Center on November 15'~, at 10:00 a.m.. Mobile Solutions is a specialized van equipped to bring the Braille Institnte's programs and services to people who are not able to travel to one of their regional centers. The next appearance at the Senior Center will be on Thursday, December 16th, from 9:00 a.m. until 1:30 Commodity Distribution - On the first Monday of every month, USDA surplus food that is provided by the County Food Bank is distributed by volunteers and staff to low income residents of Rancho Cucamonga on a first-come, first-serve basis at the Senior Center. The next distribution date will be held on December 6, 1999. · Dr. Anita Kundi will provide a free Women's Wellness Lecture at the Senior Center on Tuesday, November 23~a, at 1:00 p.m.. The topic of her presentation will be Lupus. Facilities: A new 60-inch restaurant-style gas range for the kitchen at the Senior Center, for the daily nutrition program, was installed this month. Other items received at the Center during the reporting period included a large bingo display board, new carpet in the Royalty Room and a new telephone system for the Center. CITY COUNCIL PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE November 17, 1999 Six (6) events are scheduled for the Heritage Park Equestrian Center during the reporting.period. They include a Horse Show by 4-H on October 30~ from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and a play day sponsored by the Alta Loma Riding Club on October 31" from 9:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. During the month of December 1999, Rising Stars of Equestrian Therapy will host their Christmas Show on December 5~ from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and on December 10th, 4-H will be having their Christmas Party from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Community Wide Special Events: The Founders Day Parade and Celebration was held on Saturday November 13th. The theme for the parade was "The Magical World of Kids." The parade began at 9:30 a.m. at Base Line and Archibald, and marched West toward Red Hill Park. The Celebration, was held from 10 am - 4 p.m. at Red Hill Park and featured an exciting array of new features, including an expanded Kids Zone, with rides and attractions for all ages. Also new to the event this year is a City display area featuring vehicles and displays from many City departments. The Chamber of Commerce Expo also returned to be a part of the. Celebration this year. At the time is report was prepared the event had not yet taken place, therefore, attendance information will be provided as part of next month's report. A Deck the Halls Holiday Craft Fair is scheduled at Lions East and West Community Centers on Friday, December 10th, from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. and Saturday, December 11m from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. On Friday there will be a no-cost "Taste of the Town" and on Saturday, a snack bar will be provided by our very own TRAC members. This event will feature unique quality crafts, live musical entertainment and strolling carolers from Alta Loma, Rancho Cucamonga and Etiwanda High Schools and Chaffey College. City staff will provide supervision for children participating in a free Fun Zone that will offer youngsters the opportunity to create a hands-on craft or listen to stories. Trolley rides with Santa will also be available from 10:00- 3:00 p.m.. Cost for trolley rides is $1.00 for adults; children ride free of charge when accompanied by an adult. Rancho Cucamonga Performing Arts Academy: Over the next few months, the Academy will offer a Talent Connection Commercial Workshop for children ages 5-13; a Tiny Tunes Workshop (song & dance) for tiny tots ages 3 1/2 to 5; a Dance Production and Performance Workshop for youngsters ages 6-13; and a Vocal Expression and Performance Workshop for all children and adults of all ages. Each workshop session is five (5) weeks long and meets once a week at the Academy in the Tetra Vista Town Center. Encore Entertainment will offer two (2) Creative Theater Workshops after school on Mondays and Wednesdays, for children ages 6-9 and Tuesdays and Thursdays, for youngsters ages 10-13 years old. The Encore Entertainment Creative Theater Workshop session is four (4) weeks long. -7- CITY COUNCIL PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE November 17, 1999 "Prestigious Players" is an actor's workshop for seniors 55 years and older. Classes are held on Wednesdays, from 1:00 until 3:00 p.m., at the Senior Center. This workshop is possible through a grant and is free to all participants. Performances will be held at the Academy. "A Holiday Extravaganza" - Tree Lighting Ceremony will be held on December 2, 1999, from 6-9 p.m.. The ceremony will take place in the Tetra Vista Town Center food court area, near Edward's Cinema. Families will be able to enjoy special performances by local school and church choirs, the Etiwanda High School Marching Eagles Regimen, the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber Singers and special numbers by the cast of "Ebeneezer". Free trolley rides, visits with Santa, puppet show, and refreshments will be held at the Academy immediately following the tree lighting ceremony. Photos with Santa will be available for purchase. Tickets for "Ebeneezer" will be on sale the day of the event. "Ebeneezer", a full length, original, musical adaptation of Charles Dickens' "A Christmas Carol" is being co-sponsored by the City, Lewis Retail Centers and Starlight Productions, Inc. This production will include period costuming, special effects, and unique sets. Snack bar items will be available for purchase at each performance. Scheduled performances for the production include: December 3, 4, 10, 11, 17 and 18 at 7:00 p.m. and December 5, 12 and 19 at 2:00 p.m.. All performances will take place at the Performing Arts Academy. Contract Classes: The Fall session of contract classes began in September and will end in December. Over two hundred (200) different classes, from aerobics to yoga were offered for community members to enjoy. The Grapevine: · The winter issue of The Grapevine began production in October and will be distributed to 48,000 postal patrons in early December. This issues focuses on City services in the 21 st century. Park and Recreation Commission: The following items were discussed/acted upon at the Commission's October 28, 1999 meeting: · Review and discussion of Environmental Assessment and Conditional Use Permit 98-30 North Town Housing Development Corporation. · Review and discussion of Sports Advisory Committee recommendations for consideration under the Recreation and Needs Assessment component of the General Plan. · Discussion of potential sites for future sports facilities. · Discussion regarding Red Curb Removal Study. · Discussion regarding the 1999 National Recreation and Parks Congress. · Update Central Park Task Force. -8- CITY COUNCIL PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES UPDATE November 17, 1999 Update General Plan Task Force. Update Community Foundation. Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Senior Advisory Committee. Update and establishment of future agenda items for the Sports Advisory Committee. Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation: The following items were discussed/acted upon at the Foundation's November 9, 1999 meeting: · Discussion regarding the Community Foundation's Ebenezeer Event. · Discussion regarding the Community Foundation's New Orleans Casino Night. · Discussion regarding the 1999 Founder's Day Parade and Celebration to be held on Saturday, November 13, 1999. · Discussion regarding potential Associate Members. Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter: · No rental activities took place at the Epicenter during the reporting period. Staff received a copy of the Quakes game schedule for the 2000 season. With this information staff has been able to commence work with applicants interested in renting the facility for the next year. At the November ya City Council meeting co-sponsorship of the Police/Fire Year 2000 SoftbaH and Football Games (June25-July 2, 2000) and the San Bemardino County Search and Rescue Team Fun Run and Safety Fair (April 29, 2000) were approved. Volunteers: · Since the beginning of the year, volunteers have provided 19,690 hours of service with our Department. Respectfully submitted, '~ ez ent Director CK A '~eervices Director/fill \ \ S R V_ CFl'~ \ D~artments\ COM~tS E R VX Ca~ndl~~Boards \ O~yC~un,iA S taat~RtpansXfinalt 1.99update. dc~'