HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997/05/06 - Agenda Packet DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES
TUESDAY MAY 6, 1997 6:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
RAINS ROOM
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Committee Members: Bill Bethel Rich Macias Dan Coleman
Alternates: Peter Tolstoy Dave Barker Larry McNiel
CONSENT CALENDAR
The following items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. Typically they are items such
as plan revisions prepared in response to discussions at a previous meeting.
6:00 p.m.
(Tom) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-35 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request
to develop a 6,500 square foot commercial building within an existing commercial center in
the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of 19th Street and
Carnelian Street- APN: 201-221-45.
6:10 p.m.
(Nancy) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95-32 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - The design
review of a restaurant pad and an 8,950 square foot retail building (Pad S) within
Terra Vista Town Center, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of
Aspen Avenue - APN: 1077-421-82 and 83.
PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS
This is the time and place for the Committee to discuss and provide direction to an applicant
regarding their development application. The following items do not legally require any public
testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input.
6:15 p.m.
(Steve) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-08 - STANDARD PACIFIC - Review of a revised
conceptual grading scheme for a previously approved design review for Tract 13564,
a County approved residential subdivision of 182 residential lots on 117 acres of land,
located between Wardman Bullock Road and the San Sevaine Wash, north of the
Southern California Edison utility corridor - APN: 226-082-30 and 58-63.
6:55 p.m.
(Tom) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15783 - G & D
CONSTRUCTION-A residential subdivision of 27 single family homes on 3.35 acres
of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on
the west side of Camelian Street at Vivero Street - APN: 207-022-54 and 64.
7:35 p.m.
(Brent) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-02 -
WALLNER TOOLING- Review of detailed site plan, landscape plan, and elevations
for the construction of a 20,000 square foot addition to an existing 16,000 square foot
building on 2.33 acres of land, located within Subarea 14 (General Industrial) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, at 9076 Hyssop Drive - APN: 229-283-007.
8:15 p.m.
(Brent) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15798 -
FRIEDMAN - A request to subdivide 19.26 acres of land into 45 lots for the purpose
of single family home construction in the Low Residential District(2-4 dwelling units
per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located west of the I-15 Freeway and south of
Highland Avenue - APN: 227-071-32.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the
Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five
minutes per individual.
ADJOURNMENT
I, Tricia Ashby, Secretary of the Planning Division for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 1, 1997, at least 72
hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive,
Rancho Cucamonga.
J fuca.G l�(1�ct
CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS
May 6, 1997
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-35 - LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to develop a
6,500 square foot commercial building within an existing commercial center in the Neighborhood
Commercial District, located at the northeast corner of 19th Street and Carnelian Street- APN: 201-221-45.
Members Present: Bill Bethel, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Tom Grahn
The Committee (Bethel, Coleman) supported the design alternative that utilizes a hipped tile roof on the
tower element, located on the southwest corner of the proposed building .
CONSENT CALENDAR COMMENTS
May 6, 1997
1
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 95-32 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - The design review of a
restaurant pad and an 8,950 square foot retail building (Pad S) within Terra Vista Town Center,
located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, west of Aspen Avenue- APN: 1077-421-82 and 83.
BACKGROUND: On September 23, 1992, the Planning Commission approved Development
Review 92-08 for a restaurant and a retail building at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard
and Aspen Avenue. The approval has lapsed. On November 14, 1995, the applicant submitted a
new development proposal for the same site. The application was deemed incomplete and the file
has been inactive since January 1996. On April 29, 1997, the applicant requested the previous
approved plans from DR 92-08 be used for the current Development Review application.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION COMMENTS:
Members Present: Bill Bethel, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Nancy Fong
The Committee reviewed the previously approved plans and recommended approval.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
i
6:15 p.m. Steve Hayes May 6, 1997
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-08 - STANDARD PACIFIC - Review of a revised conceptual
grading scheme for a previously approved design review for Tract 13564, a County-approved
residential subdivision of 182 residential lots on 117 acres of land, located between Wardman
Bullock Road and the San Sevaine Wash, north of the Southern California Edison utility corridor -
APN: 226-082-30 and 58-63.
Background: This item was originally reviewed on a courtesy basis by the Design Review
Committee (Macias, McNeil, Fong) on December 17, 1996. Please refer to the attached Design
Review Committee Action Comments from this meeting for a discussion of issues and
recommendations forwarded by the Committee to the applicant.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion:
The Conceptual Grading Plans have been revised in accordance with Alternative C presented to the
Committee on December 17, 1996. Generally, slopes over 15 feet in vertical height are proposed
with a variation and undulation to the slopes ranging from 2:1 to 3:1. Slopes under 15 feet in vertical
height are generally proposed with a 2:1 slope gradient. Retaining walls at the bottom of slope areas
are generally not necessary, given the large size and ample building area on these lots. In staff s
opinion, the revised conceptual grading is acceptable subject to the following:
1. Slope planting, including drought tolerant and fire resistant trees,shrubs, ground cover,and
an underground irrigation system, be provided in accordance with the City's Slope Planting
Requirements and Wildland Interface Requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District.
2. A minimum of 15 feet of flat, usable rear yard area shall be provided on each lot with
future development of the subdivision.
3. Any retaining walls shall be composed of a decorative block material or receive a
decorative exterior finish.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend
approval of the project with the above-referenced conditions.
Attachment: DRC Action Comments Dated December 17, 1996
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Bill Bethel, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Steve Hayes
The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project with conditions as
recommended above.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
6:10 p.m. Dan Coleman December 17, 1996
TRACT 13564 - STANDARD PACIFIC - Review of conceptual grading scheme for an approved
subdivision of 182 lot single family lots on 117 acres of land located between Wardman Bullock Road and
San Sevaine Wash, north of the Southern California Edison corridor.
Desien Parameters:
The project is part of the Etiwanda Highlands community approved by the County and annexed into the
City (see Exhibit"X'). The site slopes from north to south with up to an 8 percent grade. Development
of the site is governed by the Etiwanda highlands Development Plan which includes an approved Grading
Plan (see Exhibit `B") with conventional grading using terraced pads.
Staff Comments:
The developer is proposing the use of a conventional grading scheme. The developer is aware of the City's
sensitivity to grading in hillside areas and desires the Committees direction, prior to making a formal
submittal. Plans will be presented at the meeting which illustrate through plan and sections the proposed
grading scheme in relation to the originally proposed scheme and the natural grade.
This is a discussion item only and no formal action is necessary.
Attachments
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Dan Coleman
The applicant indicated their desire to eliminate cross-lot drainage (as used in Tract 13565) because of
long term maintenance and liability problems for homeowners. The applicant presented three alternative
grading schemes illustrated in plan and sections:
Alternative A 2:1 slopes Largest usable pad depth
Alternative B 2:1 on top 1/3 of slope Preferred by applicant
3:1 on lower 2/3 of slope 125 ft. min. usable pad depth
Alternative C 2:1 and 3:1 undulating slopes 117 ft. min. usable pad depth
19 lots have <14,000 s.f. min.
Regardless of which alternative is used, the applicant intends to use wrought iron fencing at rear property
line and on interior side property lines on slopes to maintain views. Also, special landscaping will be used
on slopes (i.e., drought tolerant, low maintenance).
The Committee supported the concept of eliminating cross-lot drainage and indicated a preference for
Alternatives B and C.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:10 p.m. Tom Gratin May 6, 1997
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15783 - G & D
CONSTRUCTION - A residential subdivision of 27 single family homes on 3.35 acres of land in
the Medium Residential District(8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the west side of Camelian
Street at Vivero Street - APN: 207-022-54 and 64.
Background: This project was reviewed at the November 19, 1996, Design Review Committee
meeting (see attached minutes). At that meeting the Committee recommended the following design
modifications:
1. The Site Plan and architecture should be revised to reflect a project of superior quality and
design consistent with the Optional Development Standards.
2. The Site Plan appears too tight and should be reduced in density to open up space around
units and provide for more useable common open space.
3. Provide an additional floor plan with different massing, proportion, and scale. This will
reduce the monotony of the streetscape when viewing the project from Carnelian Street.
4. Revise the design of the common open space areas to provide areas suitable for recreation.
Design Parameters: The project site is roughly triangular in shape fronting onto the west side of
Camelian Street. To the north of the project site are single family homes and a Cucamonga County
Water District water tank, to the east are single family homes, and to the west and south is the
Cucamonga Creek Channel. There are a number of trees located throughout the project site and a
row of Eucalyptus trees adjacent to Carnelian Street, the vast majority of which are proposed for
removal with development of the project. There are no known cultural resources.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion:
Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. Development Standards - The project proposes the development of single family homes
in the Medium Residential District and because of the product type (i.e., single family
homes) is required to utilize the Optional Development Standards. Optional Development
Standards are "intended to provide high standards for the development of projects of
superior quality and compatibility. " The Committee must determine if the project Site
Plan and architecture reflect a design of superior quality and compatibility.
2. Project Density- The Site Plan was revised to reduce the number of proposed units from
29 to 27. Based upon the net project acreage of 3.35 acres of land, there are 8.05 units
proposed per acre. This reduction in density opened up the project and increased the area
of private open space around each unit.
3. Architecture - The original project design included one floor plan with two elevations that
provided five elevation alternatives through variation in the placement of garage doors,
front entry doors, second story windows, and roof massing. The project architecture was
revised to provide one additional elevation with two alternatives that provide different roof
massing and window placement.
DRC COMMENTS
TT 15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION
May 6, 1997
Page 2
4. Recreational Amenities - The previous Design Review submittal complied with the
required number of recreational amenities for projects with 30 units or less by providing
a swimming pool, barbeque facility, and large open lawn area at one area of the project
site. The Committee should determine if the recreational amenities provided meet the
intent of the code requirements.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Provide berming within the landscaped area adjacent to Carnelian Street. The berming
should be undulating, approximately 3 feet in height, and non-uniform in appearance.
Berming must be designed to take into consideration the requirements of the drainage
improvements to the trees adjacent to Carnelian Street. Since no fencing is proposed, a
careful combination of landscaping and berming should be used adjacent to Camelian
Street to: a) define private on-site space to discourage unwanted entries; b) soften the
appearance of nine front-on garages, and c) discourage children from running into the
street.
2. Revise the internal driveway to delete the extra paving beyond the 50-foot radius in the
extreme northwest comer of the project site. The affected driveways, sidewalks, etc.,
should be extended accordingly.
3. Adequate on-site lighting shall be provided to ensure a safe environment while at the same
time not causing areas of intense light or glare. No lighting is currently shown; however,
the previous submittal only identified wall mounted fixtures adjacent to garage doors.
Project lighting needs to identify lighted driveways and recreation areas. Fixtures and
poles should be designed and placed in a manner consistent and compatible with the
overall site and building character.
Policv Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. The project has proposed a trail connection to the future regional trail located along the
Cucamonga Creek Channel. This access is located between Lots 9 and 10. A lockable
gate should be provided. The final design of the trail connection is subject to the
recommendation by the Trails Committee.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee forward the project to the Planning
Commission for their consideration.
DRC AGENDA
TT 15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION
November 19, 1996
Page 2
3. Recreational Amenities- The project complies with the required amenities for projects of 30 units
or less.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee
will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Provide decorative paving at the project entry behind the public right-of-way.
2. Provide berming within the landscaped area adjacent to Camelian Street. The berming should be
undulating, approximately 3 feet in height, and non-uniform in appearance. Berming must be
designed taking into consideration the requirements of the drainage improvements to Camelian
trees. Since no fence is proposed, a careful combination of landscaping and berming should be
used to a) define the private on-site space to discourage unwanted entries, b) soften the appearance
of nine garages from Camelian Street, and c) discourage children from running out onto Camelian
Street.
3. The project should be designed with a trail connection to the future regional trail located along the
Cucamonga Creek Channel. A lockable gate should be provided. It is not clear whether a trail
connection is proposed between Units 9 and 10.
4. Revise the internal driveway to delete the extra paving beyond the 50-foot radius in the extreme
northeast and northwest comers of the project site. The affected driveways, sidewalks, etc.,should
be extended accordingly.
5. Delete the connections from Lot 1 and 8 to the pool/spa area. The location and size of these areas
could become a security and maintenance problem.
6. Adequate on-site lighting shall be provided to ensure a safe environment while at the same time
not causing areas of intense light or glare. The only lights identified are wall-mounted fixtures
adjacent to unit garage doors. Lighting needs to be expanded to identify lighting driveways and
recreation areas. Fixtures and poles shall be designed and placed in a manner consistent and
compatible with the overall site and building character.
7. Provide decorative metal fence, with gated access, to secure the open space and tot lot area north
of Unit 27.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the project be redesigned and returned for review by the Design Review
Committee.
Design Review Committee Comments:
Members Present: Rich Macias, Larry McNiel, Nancy Fong
Staff Planner: Tom Gratin
DRC AGENDA
TT 15783 - G & D CONSTRUCTION
November 19, 1996
Paee 3
The Committee recommended that the-applicant work with staff to revise the project to address the
following design issues and return to the Design Review Committee for review.
1. The project Site Plan and architecture should be revised to reflect a project of superior quality and
design consistent with the Optional Development Standards.
2. The Site Plan appears too tight and should be reduced in density to open up space around units and
provide for more useable common open space.
3. Provide an additional floor plan with different massing, proportion, and scale. This will reduce
the monotony of the streetscape when viewing the project from Camelian Street.
4. Revise the design of the common open space areas to provide areas suitable for recreation.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
6:00 p.m. Tom Grahn November 19, 1996
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15783 - G & D
CONSTRUCTION - A residential subdivision of 29 single family homes on 3.35 acres of land in the
Medium Residential District(8-14 dwelling units per acres), located on the west side of Camelian Street
at Vivero Street - APN: 207-022-54 and 64.
Design Parameters:
To the north of the project site are single family homes and a CCWD water tank, to the east are single
family homes, and to the west and south is the Cucamonga Creek Channel. The project site is roughly
triangular in shape fronting onto the west side of Camelian Street. There are a number of trees located
throughout the project site and a row of Eucalyptus trees adjacent to Camelian Street, the vast majority
of which are proposed for removal with development of the project. There are no known cultural
resources located on the project site.
Design Constraints:
The small site area and triangular shape present unique design challenges. Also, additional dedication
is need to realign Camelian Street to address traffic safety concerns. As a result there are multiple
variances needed.
Related Projects:
In October 1989, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract No. 14263 which proposed the
development of thirty-two condominium units on the project site. In January 1993, the Planning
Commission approved a design review modification to the project site to revise the site plan and building
elevations for thirty-two town homes. Both previous approvals utilized duplexes for the project design.
Staff Comments:
The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding
this project:
1. Development Standards - The project is required to utilize the Optional Development Standards
to develop single family detached homes in the Medium District; however, the Development Code
identifies a minimum project area of 5 acres for use of these standards. Therefore, the applicant
has submitted a Variance to address this inadequacy.
The Development Code states that "[the optional development]standards are intended to provide
high standards for the development of projects of superior quality and compatibility. " The
Committee should consider whether the project features a superior architectural design, site
planning, and its relationship of private and common open space areas, and in its relationship to
adjacent uses.
2. Architectural Style - The project proposes the development of twenty-nine units utilizing one
floor plan with five elevations. These elevations utilize a variety of materials, window treatments,
garage door treatments, etc. The Committee should consider whether the massing and proportion
are too repetitive and do not provide enough variety when viewed from the adjacent street
frontage. To breakup the repetitive nature of the project architectural style an additional floor plan
could be provided that utilizes distinctly different massin„ proportion, and scale.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:35 p.m. Brent Le Count May 6, 1997
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 97-02 - WALLNER
TOOLING - Review of detailed site plan, landscape plan, and elevations for the construction of a
20,000 square foot addition to an existing 16,000 square foot building on 2.33 acres of land, located
within Subarea 14 (General Industrial) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, at 9076 Hyssop Drive -
APN: 229-283-007.
Design Parameters: The 2.3- acre site is located at the northwest corner of 6th Street and Hyssop
Drive and is occupied by an existing 16,000 square foot manufacturing facility. The site is adjacent
to the 1-15 Freeway to the west and all other surrounding properties are vacant. The addition is for
expansion of the existing manufacturing use which involves the processing and fabrication of sheet
metal into partially finished products. The addition will also house the excess materials currently
stored outdoors on site. The existing building is a simple metal building with exposed block
foundation built in the early 1980s. The Industrial Area Specific Plan prohibits use of all metal
sheathing for newly constructed buildings; however, because this is a proposal for an attached
addition to an existing metal building, staff has determined that it would be appropriate to allow the
addition to be metal. However, the design of the metal addition must maximize architectural quality
rather than simply provide a more cost-effective construction alternative.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion:
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project.
1. The office/entry portion of the building should be much stronger as it is located near the
corner of Hyssop Drive and 6th Street and is one of the few form-giving elements of the
building. Revise elevations to articulate* building entrance and provide a formal entry
statement through variations in architectural planes, pavement surface treatment, and
landscape plazas.
2. The building walls are long (200 feet), flat, monotonous, uninterrupted planes. Revise
building elevations to add visual interest through variations of architectural planes,
fenestration", color/material variation, and use of decorative architectural elements (such
as metal corbels supporting mansards similar to the BHP Steel building).
3. The existing exposed foundation is smooth-faced concrete block which, while most
inexpensive, provides little aesthetic value. Provide decorative block for exposed
foundation treatment (such as split-faced block, slump stone, brick, or equivalent). Also,
use veneer matching appearance of decorative block on existing exposed foundation to tie
the addition and existing building together visually.
4. Revise Site Plan to eliminate excessive and unnecessary pavement areas, particularly the
northerly two-way drive aisle (see attached sketch).
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues.:
1. Provide landscaping along west edge of site to screen views of loading doors on the west
elevation from the I-15 Freeway (one tree per 30 linear feet as required by the Industrial
Area Specific Plan).
DRC COMMENTS
DR 97-02 - WALLNER
May 6, 1997
Page 2
3. Provide intensified landscape treatment at southeast comer of the site to take advantage of
the large landscape area and to emphasize the entry statement.
4. Provide masonry pilasters for wrought iron fencing along both street frontages. Masonry
should match that used on exposed foundation.
5. Landscape 6th Street per City Master Plan with Magnolia grandi flora "Majestic Beauty"
trees within the parkway. Sidewalk should be adjacent to property line as shown on the
Site and Grading Plans (not adjacent curb as shown on Landscape Plan).
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. Landscape the frontage along the I-15 Freeway or pay in-lieu of construction fees per
Planning Commission Resolution 87-185.
2. Screen parking from street with a combination of undulating berms, landscaping, and/or
low walls.
3. Screen propane tank near west property line from the street with landscaping and/or low
walls.
4. Specify on the plans that any rooftop equipment will be screened from view of surrounding
public rights-of-way, including the I-15 Freeway.
5. Revise Landscape Plan to show property line adjacent sidewalk consistent with the Site
and Grading Plans. Note that this revision will affect landscaping shown on both street
frontages.
6. Provide tables, benches/chairs, and trash receptacles for outdoor eating area.
*Articulation is a variation in the building planes (vertically or horizontally).
**Fenestration is the placement/organization of windows, doors, and any other building openings.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Design Review Committee recommend approval
of the project with the above changes.
Attachment: Site Plan
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Bill Bethel, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Brent Le Count
The Committee requested that the project be redesigned to address staff's comments and brought
back at the May 20, 1997, meeting. The Committee added the following additional comments:
DRC COMMENTS
DR 97-02 - WALLNER
May 6, 1997
Page 3
1. Provide masonry wall along north property line to reduce impact of northerly winds on site.
2. Stucco exterior of exposed foundation on existing and proposed addition to provide visual
interest and tie the addition and existing building together visually.
3. The Committee also supported the concept of expanding the addition to the north by 4 to 5,000
square feet as a way to eliminate excess paving.
• .� � jOa
N+
i Z
a=
11
I ff : : 3s 5
' �
. i fie §� —z 3If sgs 4 1 1 I d
S$ r l 1
g� 5� 755
`s' b473ea .`.? i$Id. fi taae
-1 ax 1I
Na I NA , LIitO i
2 =
I' I
I I I I
i I it I I
I
1 I o
I
i
I I I I
I J
A 'I I � I •A a ` it
I
1
I I I I77I I
O I
I i I I N I
4 I
LU i
I Lll
Lt, I 1 wuu�m�a.m`n t i I•� 1
Lu -
lL
'JT a9G'ri
IT I � F �. �rmrg nwznw Lwlss) I€4 y¢ I
� � P I�� I F j111 IIII eae
I I ,
i P4 i
t — \ 1
ate.
13381S H19
I a
I
I I
i I
I I
j1 I 1
I
! 1
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
8:15 p.m. Brent Le Count May 6, 1997
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 15798 - FRIEDMAN -A request
to subdivide 19.26 acres of land into 45 lots for the purpose of single family home construction in
the Low Residential District(2-4 dwelling units per acre)of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located west
of the I-15 Freeway and south of Highland Avenue -APN: 227-071-32.
Design Parameters: The 19.26-acre site is currently vacant and slopes gently from north to south
at approximately 2 to 3 percent. The site is surrounded by a drainage channel and single family
homes in Tract 13063 to the west; a County Flood Control basin to the south; single family homes,
a nursery, vacant land, and the I-15 Freeway to the east; and Highland Avenue and vacant land to
the north. Highland Avenue is proposed to be realigned along the project frontage to accommodate
the Route 30 Freeway on the north side of Highland. A 13.5-foot high sound wall or combination
sound wall and berm is necessary along the northern project perimeter to reduce on-site freeway
noise to acceptable levels.
The project is subject to the Low Residential standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which require
a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet and an average minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet.
The site contains several large Eucalyptus trees which appear to be remnant windrows. The
Etiwanda Specific Plan allows windrows to be removed subject to replacement. An Arborist Study
for the trees indicates that none of the trees are worthy of preservation.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion:
i
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. Staff feels there are no major design issues associated with this project.
Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Make comer lots (Lots 14, 15, 30, and 31) wider to provide opportunities for greater
setbacks from Mulberry Street.
2. The sound wall along Highland Avenue shall be designed to match the appearance of the
existing walls to the west along Highland Avenue which are associated with Tract 13063.
3. Provide more gradual, variable slopes for lot side of noise berm within Lots 39 through 45
to allow greater utility of rear yards.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. Existing on-site Eucalyptus windrows shall be replaced with 5-gallon minimum Spotted
Gum Eucalyptus trees planted 8 feet on center in accordance with Etiwanda Specific Plan
Sections 5.41.400 and 500.
2. Revise Lot 6 to respect the 100-foot minimum lot depth.
DRC COMMENTS
TT 15798 - FRIEDMAN
May 6, 1997
Page 2
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Design Review Committee recommend approval
of the project with the above changes.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members Present: Bill Bethel, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Brent Le Count
The Committee recommended approval of the project subject to the following conditions:
I. Where reasonable, make comer lots (Lots 14, 15, 30, and 31) wider to provide opportunities
for greater setbacks from Mulberry Street.
2. The sound wall along Highland Avenue shall be designed to match the appearance of the
existing walls to the west along Highland Avenue which are associated with Tract 13063.
3. Existing on-site Eucalyptus windrows shall be replaced with 5-gallon minimum Spotted Gum
Eucalyptus trees planted 8 feet on center in accordance with Etiwanda Specific Plan Sections
5.41.400 and 500.
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
May 6, 1997
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Ae���
Brad Buller
Secretary