No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013/06/19 - Agenda Packet 44-11:4" f city of ANCHOC, UCAMUNUA 10500 Civic Center Drive ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays b 7:00 P.M. JUNE 19, 2013 ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications Conduct of Closed Session City Manager Announcements REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS MAYOR L. Dennis Michael MAYOR PRO TEM Sam Spagnolo COUNCIL MEMBERS William Alexander Marc Steinorth Diane Williams CITY MANAGER John R. Gillison •- CITY ATTORNEY James L. Markman ` . i �z CITY CLERK Janice C. Reynolds • ;•v. • - ws .� j ,M1 ,, ..INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC L =::J =A'A • . Ili.`C UL.AMONG,`. TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board,Authority Board and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board,Authority Board or City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. If as part of your presentation,you would like to display audio or visual material, please see the City Clerk before the meeting commences. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During"Public Communications,"your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any remaining "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" Item or on an "Administrative Hearing Item(s)," your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS - Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter,the City's Public Library(-ies)and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST- Fire Board,Authority Board and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The City has added the option for customers without cable access to view the meetings "on- demand"from their computers. The added feature of"Streaming Video On Demand"is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhal!/council/videos.asp for those with Hi-bandwidth(DSL/Cable Modem)or Low-bandwidth (Dial-up) Internet service. The Fire Board, Authority Board and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire District Board and the Public Financing Authority Board. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cityofrc.us InIf you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. 77 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, •••a• PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 1 I ••*••e • *w CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 19, 2013 A. 5:00 P.M. — CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER — TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM Al. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Steinorth and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) IC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) J ID. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION — TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM 1 D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR CHRIS PAXTON PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION. THE MID-MANAGER. SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL GROUP, THE GENERAL LABOR GROUP. THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTER ASSOCIATION LOCAL 227, THE FIRE SUPPORT GROUP AND THE FIRE MANAGEMENT GROUP— CITY, FIRE D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B) — NUMBER OF CASES (2) - CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13349 BASELINE AVENUE. 13451 BASELINE AVENUE, AND 13479 BASELINE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 1100-771-02, -03, AND -09: NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, PACIFIC/COSTANZO/ LEWIS- FONTANA, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT- CITY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, •• :'-' PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 2 *'•• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 19, 2013 D4. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR TWO PROPERTIES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF GROVE AVENUE, NORTH OF 81" STREET AND MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 8837 GROVE AVENUE, AND THE SECOND PROPERTY IS SOUTH OF ARROW HIGHWAY, EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, AND MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 8590 MALVEN AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA DANIELS, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER AND RYAN COBB REPRESENTING NATIONAL CORE REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS I F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Steinorth and Williams H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Hi. Animal Center Information. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 3 `:" CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 19, 2013 I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board, Public Financing Authority Board and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT I J1. Approval of Minutes: June 5, 2013 (Regular and Special Meetings) - - - June 6, 2013 (Special Meeting) - - - June 13, 2013 (Special Meeting) - - - J2. Approval of Check Register dated 5/29/13 through 6/11/13 for the total of $359,013.80. 1 J3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 2013. 6 J4. Approval to authorize an increase to Contract No. FD12-002 in the amount of $30,000 to 10 WLC Architects, Inc. and approve Amendment No. 02 for the expansion of original architectural design services for the Fire District Capital Maintenance Projects performed at the Amethyst Fire Station, in accordance with the proposal dated March 8, 2013, funded from Account No. 3289501-5300. ca7A, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 4 • '�� CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 19, 2013 J5. Approval of a Resolution adopting Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Salary Schedules for Fire District 11 Job Classifications. RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-031 12 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 IK. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY I K1. Approval of Minutes: June 5, 2013 (Regular Meeting) L. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL L1. Approval of Minutes: June 5, 2013 (Regular and Special Meetings) - - - June 6, 2013 (Special Meeting) - - - June 13, 2013 (Special Meeting) - - - L2. Approval of Check Register dated 5/29/13 through 6/11/13 and payroll ending 6/11/13 for 13 the total of$5,866,432.34. L3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of May 31, 2013. 46 L4. Consideration of Mills Act Application DRC2013-00384 (CO 13-148) for Route 66 IECA to 54 implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax for the Cucamonga Service Station, a designated Historic Landmark, in the Specialty Commercial District within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District located at 9670 Foothill Boulevard —APN: 0208- 153-05. 70 RESOLUTION NO. 13-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MILLS ACT AGREEMENT NO. DRC2013-00384 (ARTICLE 12, SECTION 50280 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE) FOR THE HISTORIC LANDMARK PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 9670 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, APN: 0208-153-05. L5. Approval to award the purchase of VMWare software support renewals (CO 13-127) to 83 Insight Public Sector in the amount of $61,455, utilizing US Communities IT Products and Services contract 4400001195. L6. Approval to purchase Cisco Smartnet Maintenance (CO 13-128) through Nexus IS, Inc., 84 utilizing competitively bid County of Riverside contract number RIVCO-20120-002-5/13 in an amount not to exceed $101,200. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, •114:40'- PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 5 • ':li CITY COUNCIL AGENDA • .• JUNE 19, 2013 L7. Approval to Purchase Replacement Play Equipment from Landscape Structures, Inc., for 85 the Golden Oak Park and the Mountain View Park Playgrounds, utilizing a competitively bid Cooperative Agreement awarded by Houston-Galveston Area Council (HGAC Contract No. PR 11-12), and authorize the expenditure of $42,588.39, plus $7,412.00, contingency to be funded from Account No. 1120401-5650/180120-0 (Park Development - Golden Oak Park) and $149,552.04, plus $448.00, contingency to be funded from Account No. 1134303- 5650/1833134-0 (LMD 4R - Mountain View Park). L8. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract (CO 13- 86 129) in the amount of $64,635.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, RSB Group Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $6,463.50, for the 24th Street at Deer Creek Channel — Bridge Repair Project to be funded from Drainage Funds, Account No. 11123035650/1812112-0. L9. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract (CO 13- 90 130) in the amount of $218,479.80, to the lowest responsive bidder, DD Systems Inc. dba Ace CD Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $21,847.98, for the Deer Creek Channel Bike Trail improvements from Base Line Road to Highland Avenue to be funded from Safe Routes to School and Beautification Funds, Account Nos. 12343035650/1709234-0 and 1110316-5650/1709110-0. L10. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract (CO 13- 93 131) in the amount of $144,970.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, J.D.C. Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $14,497.00, for the Etiwanda Avenue sidewalks, curb and gutter, ramps, and flashing beacons, adjacent to Grapeland Elementary School and Etiwanda Intermediate School, to be funded from Safe Routes to School Grant, Gas Tax and Citywide Infrastructure Funds, Account Nos. 1234303-5650/1837234-0, 1174303-5650/1685174-0 and 1198303-5650/1837198-0. L11. Approval of Professional Services Agreements with Ninyo & Moore (CO 13-132), Salem 98 Engineering Group, Inc. (CO 13-133), Leighton Consulting, Inc. (CO 13-134) and Converse Consultants (CO 13-135) to provide annual soils and materials testing services for FY 2013/2014, with an option to renew annually up to an additional two years, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City as approved in the budget. L12. Approval of Professional Services Agreements with CSD Land Surveying, Inc. (CO 13- 100 136), Dawson Surveying, Inc. (CO 13-137), L.E.H. & Associates (CO 13-138), Westland Group, Inc. (CO 13-139) and Madole & Associates (CO 13-140) to provide annual survey services for FY 2013/2014, with an option to renew annually up to an additional two years, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City as approved in the budget. L13. Approval of Professional Services Agreements with Aufbau Corporation (CO 13-141), Dan 102 Guerra & Associates (CO 13-142) and Onward Engineering (CO 13-143) to provide annual public works inspection/construction support and engineering support services for FY 2013/2014, with an option to renew annually up to an additional two years, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City as approved in the budget and including a provision for development plan check. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, =•• • PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 6 ;'•• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 19, 2013 L14. Approval to renew Professional Services Agreement (CO#12-075) with International Line 104 Builders, Inc. for Operation and Maintenance of the Arbors substation and the Municipal Utilities Electrical Distribution System within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Services Area for FY 2013/14 to be funded from 17053035309 and 17053035603 Municipal Utility Fund. L15. Approval to renew Professional Services Agreement (CO#12-077) with Butsko Utility 105 Design, Inc. for Technical Electrical Engineering Support within the Rancho Cucamonga Utility Services Area for FY 2013/14 to be funded from 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. L16. Approval to renew Professional Services Agreement (CO#12-078) with Applied Metering 106 Technologies, Inc. for Installation, Configuration and Meter Reading Services within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Services Area for FY 2013/14 to be funded from 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. L17. Accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for improvements for DRC2010-00348, located on the south east corner of 107 Haven and Valencia Avenues, submitted by Ralph's Grocery Company. RESOLUTION NO. 13-084 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2010-00348 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L18. Approval for an expenditure of $102,600.00 to Econolite Control Products, Inc., (CO 13- 110 144) for the purchasing of software and licenses for the Traffic Management Center Upgrade Project Citywide, to be funded from Transportation Fund, Account No. 11243035650/1831124-0. L19. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash 112 Deposit and ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract 18744, located on the north side of SR- 210 Freeway west bound off ramp at Day Creek Boulevard and west side of Stable Falls Avenue, submitted by Lennar Homes of California, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 13-085 114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 18744 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, • . ��Z ., PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 7 ��si' CITY COUNCIL AGENDA• JUNE 19, 2013 RESOLUTION NO. 13-086 115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) FOR TRACT 18744 RESOLUTION NO. 13-087 120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR TRACT 18744 RESOLUTION NO. 13-088 125 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) FOR TRACT 18744 L20. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash 130 Deposit and ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract 18856, located on the south side of Church Street between Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive, submitted by Homecoming V at Terra Vista, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 13-089 132 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 18856 133 RESOLUTION NO. 13-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4-R (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) FOR TRACT 18856 RESOLUTION NO. 13-091 138 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR TRACT 18856 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, r ,;•• • PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 8 • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 19, 2013 RESOLUTION NO. 13-092 143 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) FOR TRACT 18856 L21. Ratify Resolution No. 13-093 for the emergency acquisition of materials and contract labor 148 forces necessary to effect the required roofing repairs to the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot in the amount of $102,654 and to appropriate $102,654 from Community Development Block Grant Funds Account Number 12043145650-1389. RESOLUTION NO. 13-093 150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICES WITHOUT COMPETITIVE BIDDING. L22. Accept the bids received for the Central Park Carpeting Project and award and authorize 152 the execution of a contract (CO 13-145) for the base bid plus bid additives 2 through 5, in the amount of $91,101.17, to the lowest responsive bidder, G & S Carpet Mills, and authorize the expenditure of a contingency in the amount of $3,890.00, from Account No. 1025001-5602. L23. Accept the bids received for the Central Park Pavilion Project and award and authorize the 154 execution of a contract (CO 13-146) for the base bid and bid additives 1 through 4, in the amount of $251,998.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, AToM Engineering, and authorize the expenditure of a 7% contingency in the amount of $17,640.00; $220,365.00 to be funded from Account No. 120401-5650/1834120-0, and $49,273.00 from Account No. 120401-5650/1803120-0 (Park Development). L24. Approval of a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission regarding 176 proposed fee modifications for program activities and facilities operated by the Community Services Department. L25. Approval of a Resolution adopting Fiscal Year 2013/2014 salary schedules for City job 179 classifications. RESOLUTION NO. 13-094 180 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014, INCLUDING CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS L26. Approval of License Agreement renewal (CO 13-147) with San Bernardino County for roof 181 space at the County Courthouse for Public Safety Video Network communications equipment. 4111,/ \ FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, � ��. i PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 9 + • CITY COUNCIL AGENDA r . JUNE 19, 2013 L27. Approval of Police Department's application of funding from the 2013/14 Edward Byne 204 Memorial Justice Application Grant using the County of San Bernardino Law and Justice Group as the grant administrator for the Public Safety Video Camera Project. ( M. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have been introduced for first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. The Fire Board, or Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by a Board Member, or Council Member. M1. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00101 AND ADDENDUM TO 206 GENERAL PLAN FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplement to Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to clarify definitions and administrative procedures, correct prior errors and omissions, and regulate cottage food operations and ancillary equipment in industrial zones. An addendum to the General Plan FPEIR has been prepared for this project. ORDINANCE NO. 860 (SECOND READING) 207 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00101, A SUPPLEMENTAL UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. N1. Adoption of Development Services Fees and Disposition of Inspection and Permit Fees. 251 RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-032 254 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FEES AND CHARGES FOR VARIOUS FIRE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INCLUDING PLAN CHECK, INSPECTION AND PERMIT FEES; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR ANNUAL WAIVER OF SPECIFIC FEES: AND WAIVER OF SPECIFIC FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-14 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND 10 *;J CITY COUNCIL AGENDA JUNE 19, 2013 0. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT I) The following item has no legal publication or posting requirements. 01. Development Code/Specific Change analysis and recommendations for the Foothill 263 Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Study DRC201 2-0061 0— Compass Blueprint Project. rP. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. P1. CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE'S 269 RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY & ARTS FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS. P2. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the - - - meetings that were attended.) P3. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council - - - Member.) Q. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING JJ R. ADJOURNMENT I I, Debra L. McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 13, 2013, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. June 5, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY CLOSED SESSION SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Fire Protection District held a special and regular closed session on Wednesday, June 5, 2013 in the Tapia Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council/Successor Agency Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Marc Steinorth, Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; City Attorney James Markman, Linda Daniels. Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) The following closed session items were considered: D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR CHRIS PAXTON PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, THE MID-MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL GROUP, THE GENERAL LABOR GROUP, THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTER ASSOCIATION LOCAL 227, THE FIRE SUPPORT GROUP AND THE FIRE MANAGEMENT GROUP— CITY, FIRE D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B) — CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7211 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-51; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, GAMERO FAMILY TRUST, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D4. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7231 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-53; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNER, CARLOS A. LANDINO, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting —June 5, 2013 - Page 1 of 15 D5. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13089 FALLING OAK DRIVE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-54; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, GERALD LOPEZ AND DANNELLE R. CARPIO, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D6. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13349 BASELINE AVENUE, 13451 BASELINE AVENUE, AND 13479 BASELINE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 1100-771-02, -03, AND -09; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, PACIFIC/COSTANZO/ LEWIS- FONTANA, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D7. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7221 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-52; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNER, DINAH PIERSON, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D8. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7195 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-49; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN. ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, ROZANNA RIVERA. JUAN RIVERA, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D9. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7175 GREEN GLEN COURT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-012-01; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNER, JAMES M. TAMAYO SR., AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D10. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13539 BASELINE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 1100-771- 01; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, TESORO SIERRA PROPERTIES. LLC, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority. City Council Minutes Regular Meeting —June 5. 2013 - Page 2 of 15 D11. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7201 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-50; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, SATINJERIT S. BHATTI AND SIMRIT BHATTI, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D12. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13079 FALLING OAK DRIVE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-55: NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, VICTOR CAMPOS AND ROSENDA PEREZ, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D13. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7391 EAST AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 1100-771-08; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: AND PROPERTY OWNERS, RICHARD P. CHADO, DARLENE L. CHADO AND ANTHONY C. CHADO, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D14. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, IDENTIFIED AS 7150 ETIWANDA AVENUE: NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA D. DANIELS, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND GWEN FROST, PRESIDENT OF THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY— CITY D15. ONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, IDENTIFIED AS 7086 ETIWANDA AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA D. DANIELS, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND GWEN FROST, PRESIDENT OF THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY— CITY IC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)] No persons were present wishing to speak. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS I No announcements were made. F. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:45 p.m. with no action taken. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting — June 5, 2013 - Page 3 of 15 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Financing Authority and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. President/Chairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Board Members/Board Members/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Marc Steinorth, Diane Williams, Vice President/Vice Chairman/Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo and President/Chairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael were present. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services; Jeff Bloom, Assistant City Manager/Economic & Community Development; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Mark Steuer, City Engineer; Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director; Nettie Neilson, Community Services Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Services Director; Veronica Fincher, Animal Care and Services Director; Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager; Fire Chief Mike Bell; Police Chief Mike Newcombe; Debra McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager and Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk. (Item 01 (Landscape Maintenance District No. 2) was considered at this time but the comments and actions are shown in the order that it was listed on the agenda.) IH. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS I H1. Healthy RC Dining Presentation. Recognizing Monaco's Pizza. Mayor Michael presented a certificate of appreciation to Monaco's Pizza and thanked them for participating in the Healthy RC Dining program. H2. Announcement of the 2013/14 Season at the Lewis Family Playhouse. Susan Sluka-Kelly, Community Services Supervisor announced the 2013/14 season of events at the Lewis Family Playhouse. H3. Hands-Only CPR presentation. Sandy Carnes, RN EMS Administrator announced upcoming Hands-Only CPR opportunities available to the public. H4. Animal Center Information. Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager, presented information on the Animal Care and Adoption Center. II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I 11. Jeri Lee noted that she attended the first Memorial Day celebration at Freedom Courtyard and was very proud of the activities held that day and the facility itself. Mrs. Lee noted the comments being made regarding the Animal Care and Services Center and noted that it is time for both sides to find a resolution to this matter. Lastly, she noted the dog tag material is very thin and noted that a return envelope should be provided along with the renewal notice. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—June 5, 2013 - Page 4 of 15 12. Jim Heitman, representing the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, spoke about upcoming activities in the community. 13. Ondra Gilbertson displayed the Animal Care and Adoption Center's euthanasia policy on the screen and noted that the Center does not a fostering, adoption or marketing policy. She disagreed with euthanasia being a final act of kindness for healthy animals. Ms. Gilbertson requested that the City Manager establish a program, directive, policies and procedures for the Center so that whenever someone new is hired they know of the community's goals. 14. Dana Keithly noted that the group is dedicated to shelter reform, looking at policies and procedures and encouraging a no-kill philosophy. She indicated that euthanasia should not be an option when an animal is healthy. Ms. Keithly showed a picture that was recently loaded onto the group's face book page and pointed out that the group is not responsible for what other people think and say on the group's site. 15. Susan Keithly noted that the group has been working with the City Manager since 2010 and left a copy of the notes of a volunteer meeting held on November 18, 2000 at her home. She displayed a photograph of a dog's paws that were full of feces and open sores, noting that the group just wanted the opportunity to improve the lives of these animals. 16. Allison Kreider noted that dogs provided by the Animal Care and Adoption Center to the free groomer have been embedded with fleas and very dirty. One dog at the Center was deemed to be a female but is really a male. Ms. Kreider was at the kiosk at Victoria Gardens on three occasions when it was supposed to be open and no one was there. 17. Jennifer Corso noted that a dog has been promoted by the Center in 2013 but died in 2012. She indicated that background checks and fingerprinting of volunteers at the Center are not reasonable when the City does not require it for large events. The City's Internet site should be changed as it has inaccurate information on when fingerprints are required. Ms. Corso volunteered for the Center in February but has yet to walk one dog. 18. David Dykstra noted that meeting policies and procedures have been set up to ensure the smooth and civil operation of this meeting. He noted that the same thing is needed for the Animal Care and Adoption Center. He noted that the City purchased a No-Kill standard and isn't using it. 19. Raymond Herrera noted that illegal aliens recently protested at Congressman Miller's office. He spoke in opposition to amnesty for illegal aliens. 110. Robin Hvidston referenced an article in the Daily Bulletin about the protest at Congressman Miller's office. She provided photographs of the work being done by We the People. In addition, Ms. Hvidston expressed concerns with various provisions of the amnesty bill under consideration by the House and Senate. 111. Dee Barrow loved America and our freedoms. She spoke in opposition to illegal aliens receiving the same rights that are granted to Americans. 112. John Lyons reported that the Animal Care and Adoption Center recently held a licensing clinic. Now that school has let out, he encouraged everyone to focus on public safety, especially at the trail. 113. Phyllis Nemeth addressed the proposed amenity bill, noting that if it passes it will cost 6.3 trillion dollars. 114. Nicole Myerchin wondered why Mr. Winograd wasn't involved in the hiring process for the Director at the Animal Care and Services Center. She expressed a concern that Mr. Winograd's policies and procedures have not been adopted. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—June 5, 2013 - Page 5 of 15 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. J. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J1. Approval of Minutes: May 15, 2013 (Regular Meeting) J2. Approval of Check Register dated May 8, 2013 through May 28, 2013 for the total of PP 9 Y � 9 Y $234,942.62. J3. Adoption of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 11-2 and ordering the annexation of such property located on the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Victoria Street, to Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (Water Mill Homes, Owner—APN: 1089-081-16,17,20&21). RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO.11-2 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 J4. Adoption of a Resolution declaring results of a Special Election in Community Facilities District No. 85-1, Annexation No. 13-1 and ordering the annexation of such property located east of East Avenue and south of the 1-210 Freeway to Community Facilities District No. 85-1 (Robert& Heather Radford, Owners—APN: 0027-732-01). RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-022 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILTIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1, ANNEXATION NO.13-1 AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF SUCH PROPERTY TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 J5. Approval of plans, specifications and estimates and to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Capital Maintenance Repair Project at the San Bernardino Road Fire Station (172). RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CAPTIAL MAINTENANCE REPAIR PROJECT AT THE SAN BERNARDINO ROAD FIRE STATION (172) IN THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—June 5, 2013 - Page 6 of 15 J6. Approval to award the purchase of Business Class Computers, Monitors, and Software to Golden Star Technology in the amount of $69,030 for the District's Computer Replacement Project to be funded in accordance with the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 amended budget. J7. Approval to award a contract for the computer installation and disposal services to Sigmanet, Inc. in the amount of $19,458 for the computer installation, disposal services, plus 10% contingency of $1,946 to complete the District's portion of the citywide computer replacement project to be funded in accordance with the Fiscal Year 2012-2013 amended budget. J8. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract for the base bid ($93,060.00) and the additive bid ($15,000.00) for a total amount of $108,060.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, Laird Construction Company Inc, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $10,806.00, for the Remediation and Demolition Services for the Properties at 9547 And 9561 San Bernardino Road, to be funded from Fire Protection Capital Funds, Account No. 3288501-5240 (Operation of Acquired Property); and approve an appropriation in the amount of $18,870.00 from Fire District Capital Reserves to Account No. 3288501-5240 to fund the above noted contract MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Williams, to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. K. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY K1. Approval of Minutes: May 15, 2013 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander, to approve the minutes of the meeting. Motion carried 5-0. L. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL L1. Approval of Minutes: May 15, 2013 (Regular Meeting) L2. Approval of Check Register dated May 8, 2013 through May 28, 2013 and payroll ending May 28, 2013 for the total amount of$5,822,364.26. L3. Consideration of a Light Variance requested for Minors, Majors, Juniors and Senior Divisions Tournament hosted by District 71 Little League during June 17—July 27, 2013, at Heritage, Day Creek, Epicenter and Red Hill Community Parks. L4. Approval and appropriation of funds received from the County of San Bernardino, Department of Aging and Adult Services, for assisted transportation (senior transportation) — Older Americans Act Title III B Grant in the amount of $6,920 for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 (Revenue Fund Account: 1258000-4740 Expenditure Fund Account: 1258401-5300). L5. Authorization to renew contract (CO#12-093) with Contact Security, Inc. of Brea, California with no fee increase and consistent with the original competitive bid process for FY 2013-2014 for security guard services to be conducted at various City facilities effective July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014, contingent upon the adopted Budget for FY 2013-14, in an annual amount of $269,000 to be funded from 1 001 31 2-5304 (Facilities Maintenance), 1001320-5304 (Metrolink Station Maintenance), 1290606-5300 (Archibald Library) and 1700201-5304 (Sports Complex). L6. Approval of an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District regarding the payment of the pass-thru agreement fund balance and a reimbursement for the East Avenue storm drain. ` DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—June 5, 2013 - Page 7 of 15 L7. Adoption of an Employer — Employee Relations Resolution and updated personnel rules and regulations. RESOLUTION NO. 13-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING ORDERLY PROCEDURES FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS BETWEEN THE CITY AND ITS EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 13-065 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING UPDATED PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS L8. Approval of Improvement Agreement extension for Tract 18096, located at the southwest corner of East Avenue and Via Veneto Drive, submitted by Rancho Victoria Meadows, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 13-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 18096 L9. Authorize the execution of Program Supplement Agreements No. 013-N to Administering Agency-State Agreement No. 08-5420R for Federal-Aid Projects between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California, Department of Transportation. RESOLUTION NO. 13-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SIGNING OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 013-N TO ADMINISTERING AGENCY-STATE AGREEMENT NO. 08-5420R FOR FEDERAL-AID FUNDED PROJECTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION L10. Accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for Improvements for DRC2012-00740, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Forester Place, submitted by Van Daele Corporation, a California Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 13-068 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2012-00740 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L11. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, adopting the amended Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for the expenditure of Measure "I" funds covering Fiscal Years 2012/2017 * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting —June 5, 2013 - Page 8 of 15 RESOLUTION NO. 13-069 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE AMENDED MEASURE "I" FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COVERING FISCAL YEARS 2012/2017 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF MEASURE "I" FUNDS L12. Accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond and file a Notice of Completion for storm drain improvements for Tract 16776, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Forester Place, submitted Van Daele Corporation, a California Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 13-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 16776 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L13. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $205,000.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, Hardy & Harper Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $20,500.00, for the 8th Street Pavement Rehabilitation from 1300' east of Hellman Avenue to 200' west of Hermosa Avenue project to be funded from Measure I Funds, Account No. 1177303- 5650/1798177-0. L14. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract, including the additive bid, in the amount of $464,300.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, Flatiron Electric Group Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $46,430.00, for the 19'h Street Traffic Signal Controller Replacement and Traffic Signal Modifications at Various Locations project to be funded from Transportation Funds, Account Nos. 1124303-5650/1152124-0, 1124303-5650/1792124-0, 1124303- 5650/1800124-0 and 1124303-5650/1828124-0. L15. Accept the Arrow Route from Baker Avenue to Archibald Avenue; Milliken Avenue from Arrow Route to Base Line Road and from Fairmont Way to 80' north of Kenyon Way Pavement Rehabilitation, Contract No. 12-123 as complete, release the bonds, accept a Maintenance Bond, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and approve the final contract amount of$1,242,597.55. RESOLUTION NO. 13-071 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ARROW ROUTE FROM BAKER AVENUE TO ARCHIBALD AVENUE; MILLIKEN AVENUE FROM ARROW ROUTE TO BASE LINE ROAD AND FROM FAIRMONT WAY TO 80' NORTH OF KENYON WAY PAVEMENT REHABILITATION, CONTRACT NO. 12-123 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK L16. Approval of Improvement Agreement extension for Parcel Map 16981, located 100 feet south of Wilson Avenue, between Hellman Avenue and Cousins Place, submitted by Steven Spies, Peter and Linda Bryan. RESOLUTION NO. 13-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 16981 * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—June 5, 2013 - Page 9 of 15 L17. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 8 for Tract 18466, located at the southeast corner of Etiwanda and Miller Avenues, submitted by Lennar Homes of California, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 13-073 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 18466 RESOLUTION NO. 13-074 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) FOR TRACT 18466 RESOLUTION NO. 13-075 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR TRACT 18466 RESOLUTION NO. 13-076 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) FOR TRACT 18466 L18. Approval of revised advance expenditure Agreement No. C13030 and revised construction cooperative Agreement No. R13028 with the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SANBAG) for Construction Phase Project Management of the Interstate 15 at Base Line Road Interchange Improvement Project. L19. Accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $154,637.90, to the lowest responsive bidder, DD Systems Inc dba Ace CD Inc, and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $15,463.79, for the FY 2012/2013 Bus Stops/Pads at Various Locations Project to be funded from Proposition 42 Funds and Pedestrian Grant Article 3 Funds, Account Nos. 1190303- 5650/1823190-0 and 1214303-5650/1823214-0 and respectively. L20. Approval to award the purchase of Business Class Computers, Spare Monitors, and Software to Golden Star Technology in the amount of $525,580 and authorize staff to reallocate previously approved Fiscal Year 2012-2013 amended budget funds as necessary among object codes to fund the Computer Replacement Project. L21. Approval to award a contract for computer installation and disposal services to Sigmanet, Inc. in the amount of $148,050 plus 10% contingency of $14,805, and authorize staff to reallocate previously approved Fiscal Year 2012-2013 amended budget funds as necessary among object codes to fund the Computer Replacement Project. L22. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Best Best and Kreiger Attorneys at Law, for legal services as Bond Counsel for the refinancing of Community Facilities District 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 1 (CFD 2003-01A) and Community Facilities District 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 2 (CFD 2003-01 B). * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—June 5, 2013 - Page 10 of 15 L23. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with David Taussing and p 9 Associates for Assessment Engineering for the refinancing of Community Facilities District 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 1 (CFD 2003-01A) and Community Facilities District 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 2 (CFD 2003-01 B). L24. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates as Financial Advisor to the City refinancing of Community Facilities District 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 1 (CFD 2003-01A) and Community Facilities District 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 2 (CFD 2003-01 B). L25. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Jones Hall, a Professional Law Corporation for Legal Services as Underwriter Counsel for the refinancing of Community Facilities District 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 1 (CFD 2003-01A) and Community Facilities District 2003-01 Improvement Area No. 2 (CFD 2003-01 B). L26. Approval to receive and file Animal Center Statistics and Animal Outcome Report for April 2013. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams, to adopt the recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. 0. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. 01. Consideration of alternate forms of Resolutions to declare the results of the assessment ballot tabulation for Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District (LMD 2). • If there is not a majority protest to the levy of assessments, adopt the form of Resolution approving the Engineer's Report, confirming the diagram and assessment, and ordering the levy and collection on annual assessments; and adopt and approve a Resolution establishing the formation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Citizens' Oversight Committee and mandating that the Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape District (LMD 2) be subject to its oversight. • If there is a Majority Protest, adopt the form of Resolution abandoning the proceedings and retain Landscape Maintenance District No. 2. RESOLUTION NO. 13-077 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION, APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, INCREASING ASSESSMENTS FOR VICTORIA NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LMD 2), ORDERING MAINTENANCE WORK THEREIN, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF AN ANNUAL ASSESSMENT THEREIN * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting —June 5, 2013 - Page 11 of 15 RESOLUTION NO. 13-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION FOR VICTORIA NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LMD 2), DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A MAJORITY PROTEST AND ABANDONING THE PROCEEDINGS TO INCREASE SUCH ASSESSMENTS THEREIN RESOLUTION NO. 13-079 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE FORMATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITIZENS' OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AND MANDATING THAT THE VICTORIA NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (LMD 2) BE SUBJECT TO ITS OVERSIGHT Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services presented the staff report. Mayor Michael opened the public hearing. Cnythia Howard spoke in opposition to the increase in assessment. She was concerned with the proposed automatic cost of living increase and wondered why the assessment wasn't tied to a San Bernardino County index. Also, Ms. Howard noted that the District always has a surplus and did not want to forgo the right to vote on assessments in the future. Victor Muniz noted that the vote in 2011 was ignored. He has lost his confidence in the City during this process. Ponchit Medina was opposed to the proposed increase in assessment. He noted that his home has depreciated in value and stated that this is the wrong time to be requesting an increase. Everyone people are tightening their belts. Jerie Lee noted that the City has done nothing but promote the increased assessment. The landscaping at Day Creek has not improved. Ms. Lee did not want the proposed assessment increase to pass but if it does, she urged the Council to make sure that the money is spent appropriately on drought tolerant landscaping. Sunday Obazuaye agreed with Ms. Howard, noting that the CPI did not need to reflect the cost of living in Orange County. If the vote had been divided into two parts, with the proposed increase and the automatic CPI taken separately, he might have considered it. John Lyons noted that the Victoria community is a beautifully planned community. When it was formed, residents wanted it to be a masterpiece and to reflect Rancho Cucamonga's premier City status. Mr. Lyons noted that the proposed assessment is $40 per year and indicated that this should not be a hardship. Bill Hanlon noted that very few people voted in support of no-smoking and now this is the law in the City. Similarly, the vote for an increased assessment failed and now it is okay to revote. Mr. Hanlon expressed a concern regarding the money that was spent to reconsider this matter and hoped that the proposed assessment failed. Karen Polescow noted that she walks the trails every day and the landscaping has been there for many years. She spoke in favor of the proposed assessment increase as she appreciates the value and uses it as a tax deduction. Ms. Polescow urged the community to take care of their properties. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting —June 5, 2013 - Page 12 of 15 Stacy Abraham noted that it is beautiful for people to have money to keep their homes and to eat. She opposed the proposed increase in the assessment. In response to the City Council, the Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services addressed the proposed CPI increase, noting that the City is in the Inland Southern California region. Also, she noted that current assessment has been in place since 1993. Mr. Gillison indicated that water rates have gone up very significantly; noting a 5% increase for the last four years. Ms. Sassoon also noted that approval of the CPI does not authorize the City to spend the entire amount. Each year, the City must demonstrate the total cost to maintain this District. She noted that CPIs are included in many Districts and stated that the City has a proven track record of not imposing the maximum allowable assessment. Lastly, she noted that if the proposed assessment is approved, a Citizens Oversight Committee is proposed to be created to review the audited report. Ms. Sassoon also noted that property tax is received by every District twice per year. As expenses are incurred monthly, a reserve is in place in order to ensure that every District has enough funds to carry it through until the next installment of property tax has been received. Mayor Michael reminded the audience that all assessment ballots and replacement assessment ballots must be received by the City Clerk prior to the end of the public hearing. Ballots received after the public hearing is closed will not be tabulated. He encouraged property owners to turn in their ballots at this time. Mayor Michael closed the public hearing and requested that the City Clerk tabulate the ballots. Once the ballots are tabulated, the City Clerk was requested to report back to the City Council. Recess: Mayor Michael recessed the meeting at 9:40 p.m. Reconvene: Mayor Michael reconvened the meeting at 10:04 p.m. with all Council Members present. City Clerk Janice Reynolds stated the following: 6,424 assessment ballots were mailed to the property within the proposed boundaries of the Landscape Maintenance District and 2,268 of those assessment ballots were received prior to the close of the public hearing. 1,144 assessment ballots representing $723,419.00 of assessments were submitted in support of the levy of the proposed assessments within the Assessment District. This is 57% of the ballots received. The City Clerk announced that 1,124 assessment ballots representing $528,432.00 of assessments were submitted in opposition to the levy of the proposed assessments within the Assessment District. This is 42%of the ballots received. Jim Markman, City Attorney, noted that there is no majority protest for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and recommended that Resolution Nos. 13-077 and 13-079 be adopted. MOTION: Moved by Spagnolo, seconded by Alexander, to adopt Resolution No. 13-077 approving the Engineer's report, increasing assessments and ordering the maintenance work therein. Motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Steinorth, seconded by Williams, to adopt Resolution No. 13-079 establishing the formation of a District Citizens Oversight Committee and mandating that the District be subject to its oversight. Motion carried 5-0 * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting —June 5, 2013 - Page 13 of 15 02. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00101 AND ADDENDUM TO GENERAL PLAN FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplement to Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to clarify definitions and administrative procedures, correct prior errors and omissions, and regulate cottage food operations and ancillary equipment in industrial zones. An addendum to the General Plan FPEIR has been prepared for this project. ORDINANCE NO. 860 (FIRST READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00101, A SUPPLEMENTAL UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Mayor Michael opened the public hearing. Council Member Steinorth appreciated the regulations for the Cottage Food industry. Council Member Alexander noted that whenever regulations are added, freedoms are lost and encouraged a balanced approach. Council Member Williams indicated that many items are now less restrictive and supported the periodic review of the document. In response to Mayor Michael, Ms. Nakamura confirmed that the sign regulations are planned to be presented to the Council in the Fall. Mayor Michael opened the public hearing. John Lyons expressed a concern with people renting homes in the community. He supported the regulations on the Cottage Food industry. Mayor Michael closed the public hearing. The Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager read the title of Ordinance No. 860. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Spagnolo, to take up Ordinance No. 860 for first reading and set second reading for June 19, 2013. Motion carried 5-0. IN. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. N1. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo provided a report on today's OmniTrans meeting. He reported that he has been selected as the Vice Chair of the Board of Directors for a two year term. Council Member Williams presented a report on a San Bernardino Association of Governments meeting that she had attended in Palm Desert. She presented the City Council with a commendation that she had accepted recognizing the City's PEV Readiness. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting —June 5, 2013 - Page 14 of 15 Mayor Michael noted that he had attended a Regional Transportation Authority meeting for the San Bernardino Association of Governments. At the meeting, the budget was adopted. Mayor Michael commended the Engineering Department for their work in saving the City one million dollars in conjunction with the I-15/Base Line Interchange Project. Also, he reported that there was a major revision to the Agency's bylaws as a nominating committee had been formed. Lastly, Mayor Michael indicated that he had been selected as the Vice President. N2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) Mayor Michael reported on an event that he had attended last weekend at Central Park. The Spirit of '45 Day will be held on August 11, 2013 and currently stories are being gathered from the veterans of World War II. II 0. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING No items were identified. P. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 10:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: * * * * * * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—June 5, 2013 - Page 15 of 15 June 5, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY CLOSED SESSION SPECIAL AND REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES lA. CALL TO ORDER The Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Fire Protection District held a special and regular closed session on Wednesday, June 5, 2013 in the Tapia Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Present were Council/Successor Agency Members: Bill Alexander, Diane Williams, Marc Steinorth, Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; City Attorney James Markman, Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) I The following closed session items were considered: D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR CHRIS PAXTON PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, THE MID-MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL GROUP, THE GENERAL LABOR GROUP, THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTER ASSOCIATION LOCAL 227, THE FIRE SUPPORT GROUP AND THE FIRE MANAGEMENT GROUP— CITY, FIRE D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION PURSUANT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(B)— CITY D3. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7211 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-51; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, GAMERO FAMILY TRUST, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D4. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7231 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-53; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNER, CARLOS A. LANDINO, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—June 5, 2013 - Page 1 of 15 D5. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13089 FALLING OAK DRIVE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-54; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, GERALD LOPEZ AND DANNELLE R. CARPIO, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D6. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13349 BASELINE AVENUE, 13451 BASELINE AVENUE, AND 13479 BASELINE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 1100-771-02, -03, AND -09; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, PACIFIC/COSTANZO/ LEWIS- FONTANA, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D7. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7221 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-52; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNER, DINAH PIERSON, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D8. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7195 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-49; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, ROZANNA RIVERA, JUAN RIVERA, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D9. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7175 GREEN GLEN COURT IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-012-01; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNER, JAMES M. TAMAYO SR., AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D10. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13539 BASELINE AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 1100-771- 01; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, TESORO SIERRA PROPERTIES, LLC, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—June 5, 2013 - Page 2 of 15 D11. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7201 ACORN PLACE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-50; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, SATINJERIT S. BHATTI AND SIMRIT BHATTI, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D12. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13079 FALLING OAK DRIVE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 0227-693-55; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND PROPERTY OWNERS, VICTOR CAMPOS AND ROSENDA PEREZ, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D13. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS FOR THE CITY PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7391 EAST AVENUE IN THE CITY OF FONTANA AND IDENTIFIED AS APN 1100-771-08; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: KIRSTEN R. BOWMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, AND JASON WELDAY, TRAFFIC ENGINEER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: AND PROPERTY OWNERS. RICHARD P. CHADO, DARLENE L. CHADO AND ANTHONY C. CHADO, AND THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVES REGARDING REAL PROPERTY INTERESTS TO BE ACQUIRED AS PART OF THE INTERSTATE 15 AND BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE PROJECT D14. CONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, IDENTIFIED AS 7150 ETIWANDA AVENUE, NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA D. DANIELS, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND GWEN FROST, PRESIDENT OF THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY— CITY D15. ONFERENCE WITH PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, NORTH OF BASE LINE ROAD, IDENTIFIED AS 7086 ETIWANDA AVENUE; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: LINDA D. DANIELS, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND GWEN FROST, PRESIDENT OF THE ETIWANDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY— CITY IC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No persons were present wishing to speak. E. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No announcements were made. F. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:45 p.m. with no action taken. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting —June 5, 2013 - Page 3 of 15 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS The meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Financing Authority and City Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. President/Chairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Board Members/Board Members/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Marc Steinorth, Diane Williams, Vice PresidentNice Chairman/Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and President/Chairman/Mayor L. Dennis Michael were present. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services; Jeff Bloom, Assistant City Manager/Economic & Community Development; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Mark Steuer, City Engineer; Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director; Nettie Neilson, Community Services Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Services Director; Veronica Fincher, Animal Care and Services Director; Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager; Fire Chief Mike Bell; Police Chief Mike Newcombe; Debra McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager and Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk. (Item 01 (Landscape Maintenance District No. 2) was considered at this time but the comments and actions are shown in the order that it was listed on the agenda.) H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Healthy RC Dining Presentation. Recognizing Monaco's Pizza. Mayor Michael presented a certificate of appreciation to Monaco's Pizza and thanked them for participating in the Healthy RC Dining program. H2. Announcement of the 2013/14 Season at the Lewis Family Playhouse. Susan Sluka-Kelly, Community Services Supervisor announced the 2013/14 season of events at the Lewis Family Playhouse. H3. Hands-Only CPR presentation. Sandy Carnes, RN EMS Administrator announced upcoming Hands-Only CPR opportunities available to the public. H4. Animal Center Information. Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager, presented information on the Animal Care and Adoption Center. I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Jeri Lee noted that she attended the first Memorial Day celebration at Freedom Courtyard and was very proud of the activities held that day and the facility itself. Mrs. Lee noted the comments being made regarding the Animal Care and Services Center and noted that it is time for both sides to find a resolution to this matter. Lastly, she noted the dog tag material is very thin and noted that a return envelope should be provided along with the renewal notice. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District, Financing Authority, City Council Minutes Regular Meeting—June 5, 2013 - Page 4 of 15 June 6, 2013 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING I A. CALL TO ORDER I A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and Fire Protection District was held on Thursday, June 6, 2013, in the Tri-Communities Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor/President L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Council Members/Board Members: Bill Alexander, Marc Steinorth, Diane Williams, Mayor Pro TemNice President Sam Spagnolo and Mayor/President L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Tamara Layne, Finance Director; Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager; Mark Steuer, Director of Engineering Services; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Director; Nettie Nielson, Community Services Director; Trang Huynh, Building and Safety Services Director; Chief Mike Bell, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Veronica Fincher, Animal Services Director, and Debra L. McNay, Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS I No communication was made from the public. C. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION I Cl. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED BUDGETS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 John Gillison, City Manager provided an updated PowerPoint presentation to address some questions that he had received from the City Council since the last budget meeting. He addressed in detail the Police Department's purchase of vehicles, noting the transition from the Crown Victoria to the Chevy Caprice. Also discussed was the reduction of part time employees in order to adjust to the provisions of the Affordable Care Act as well as the reserves. Council Member Alexander appreciated the research that was done to answer his questions and indicated that he was satisfied with the proposed budget. In response to Council Member Steinorth and Mayor Michael, discussion was held regarding reclassifications. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo noted that there are things missing from these slides that were in last year's presentation. Mr. Gillison concurred, and indicated that there are no longer furloughs or attrition management. Mayor Michael thanked the City Manager and staff for their hard work. It was noted that the formal budget documents would be presented for adoption on June 13, 2013 at a special meeting. Proposed Budgets for Fiscal Year 2013/14 Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 6, 2013 - Page 1 of 2 I E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: Proposed Budgets for Fiscal Year 2013/14 Fire Protection District, City Council Minutes June 6, 2013 - Page 2 of 2 June 13, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and City Council convened in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. President/Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at p.m. Present were Board Members/Council Members: Bill Alexander, Marc Steinorth, Diane Williams; Vice President/Mayor Pro Tern Sam Spagnolo and President/Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Linda Daniels, Assistant City Manager; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Community and Economic Development; Bill Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director; Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director; Robert Karatsu, Library Director; Veronica Fletcher, Animal Care and Services Director; Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director; Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager; Fire Chief Mike Bell; Jim Frost, City Treasurer and Debra McNay, Records Manager/Assistant City Clerk. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS B1. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Council Member for discussion. I-C. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT C1. Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated fund balance policy and 2) a Resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-024 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT C2. Approval of corrections to amended Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Appropriations. C3. Approval of repayment of funds advanced by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. C4. Adjustment in Board Member meeting stipend. RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-025 * DRAFT * Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes Special Meeting - June 13, 2013 - Page 1 of 4 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESTORING BOARD MEMBER STIPENDS MOTION: Moved by _, seconded by , to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. D. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL D1_ Approval of the following to be in compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated fund balance policy and 2) a Resolution committing to the level of fiscal reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 13-080 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA COMMITTING TO THE LEVEL OF FISCAL RESERVES FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D2. Approval of corrections to amended Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Appropriations. D3. Approval of Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2013/2014. D4. Approval of General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy. D5. Approval of repayment of funds advanced by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. MOTION: Moved by , seconded by , to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports. Motion carried 5-0. E. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. E1. Consideration to adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District General Fund preliminary budget in the amount of $24,742,110 and appropriations limit in the amount of $31,808,076 for Fiscal Year 2013/2014 and set final approval of final budget for July 17, 2013. RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION City Manager John Gillison presented the staff report. MOTION: Moved by , seconded by_, to adopt Resolution No. FD 13-026. Motion carried 5- 0. * DRAFT * Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes Special Meeting - June 13, 2013 - Page 2 of 4 E2. Consideration of approval of Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $6,870,790 and approving the appropriations limit in the amount of $12,116,607 for Fiscal Year 2013/14 in Communities Facilities District (CFD) No. 85-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-027 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-028 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 85-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION City Manager John Gillison presented the staff report. MOTION: Moved by _, seconded by _, to adopt Resolution Nos. FD 13-027 and 13-028. Motion carried 5-0. E3. Consideration of approval of Resolutions adopting a budget in the amount of $2,023,430 and approving the Appropriations Limit in the amount of $2,915,959 for Fiscal Year 2013/14 in Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION City Manager John Gillison presented the staff report. MOTION: Moved by , seconded by , to adopt Resolution Nos. FD 13-029 and 13-030. Motion carried 5-0. F. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL --- - * DRAFT * Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes Special Meeting - June 13, 2013 - Page 3 of 4 The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. F1. Consideration of adoption of Fiscal Year 2013/2014 budget and Article XIIIB appropriations limit. RESOLUTION NO. 13-081 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY'S FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 13-082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 City Manager John Gillison presented the staff report. MOTION: Moved by , seconded by , to adopt Resolution Nos. 13-081 and 13-082. Motion carried 5-0. G. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra L. McNay, MMC Assistant City Clerk/Records Manager Approved: * DRAFT * Fire Protection District and City Council Minutes Special Meeting -June 13, 2013 - Page 4 of 4 rc; ,...... E iv .4...." < U ri::; c 1, A cri 0 �,*,�,, ifx; -r3 ,,,, m vi E o . rssik, . .til (....) < 4.3 43 . til‘u U 0 c 1,7.:e 7 r ■ u el%) a% ., a ,... cp n3 m I crl ,r4:4.1 ki„........00 v...ri cie (.3 . .,... . „ . ,.,:: . . ,,. / 4,..... ,,, , 3 . ... ,..,. .„.,:,„„,,,,,,,,,, , ,„.,:„.:::....::;i„,„„,,„.:::::„....„,...„::::..„.: ,-. 0, .. .., „,„,,...,,,,,,.::........::... ...,....:„ .„:„.., ":10::...:, :.: .'.*. - ct,, r 0 z !....**1. ... c;.,,,Nk:Tc....,...",.. ,,,,,...) 0 2 ...:.: p P. P. MB . . . . . ; . . . , . . . , . , . . . ' . • , • .. „ . . . . . , .. . , . . . . . . _. . . . . . . , . , r . -. . . . . .„ . . , . ...* . .• •., ,. ,,,. . ... . „ -• ''''-',.:::;'-., . . .._. .. . .:. . . • '- '4'34:4-, .,-.--:-.'''H--.- . . ,.., .., -.. •,' „ ' ,-.. .. . , ' ,. .. .•,,• .'.- . ... . . . . , - • (41.1) 1111..... . 111Loot- C (10 > (• 7.',"1"• . Uninli . ._ . 4E, . •I 4. „ . >1% I A .. . • Min= 1 A. C ••:••:. 1 v • --,-, • , • _ - --, 0 . ....... .. ::,., .. .... .. . ... . ., E It. wiemoostio*:. 0 , •:.: ,-., „ ., .......: ......... ., ,, . .. .-:- . ,.;..44t.':-.-_:,. ... ..,....,.„,...,,,. .,„:-.-,-. •,•:.......-...,..=-.:---,. - ... .. . ......... :......:„:....::. 1 . ._ • •. , .-•-..! - . . . =. , •- ..... .:,,. , -.„..,.,..:,.,.:...•,,,,,,..,.:,„:4t1.,..-e4:.,...,-.--„....!...,,.„,.........,7,...„,.1..:-......,6,, ..:..„---..„.• ...;.,,...,.,..„.. .•.,25,,.: , IT .. ":....' '• - . ..:-i . - ..',.. !=•--.';',.••,-,":*%,".?..t: -',..,. .. - .,....'• ..„..... .';,',..„,*,!. ',, ,'•!.•',-,,'.. - ; .,.H. i. L.'. • - .• r •: rk... de ' ........ . . „, ' . 4,, ... %:.2..••: • • '''..•• ,^",.....,--.) . .• :'.. ir:''''''' • I .0,:., .•':''...... '.'::..:. ir, ..-. '.' _, . ., •H.,.. • •..:,•...• ,, . •;.;::. ...j.-....',''., ., 1: „.. . ••••••••••-••••-•• ---•• • T;,-:?' ''.',' :•••• •••t:-,:t'':', .''.''. ••••,•••:•-• • „ . . _„. . , , _ , •••••••,..•„. .•,..i:!,!'-:!,.:•'.: ,:. •• . If: ''- .. . . -,-.4 ,:.'"!,i-''. =•.:---':'*:---,:. "-,,' -_,,sr.• '. '..,,..k.; :::_.::::::i-...'::6-::64'.. '.„ _ . .+.',,,'•,• ..._70,74':',,',.'-•-•':".,„1,'-:$<;••, . r . . . .. -'•, . .- ,-.4.4..,..•,- - . -.......7.,..-- .,•_I''',,,,,.:.,„„ ,:;•,:.41-,,i>...-,,-„;.•:yp's......-, ,,,„ ;.. ..4,4 .-:.-4.:,..,•i,,., ..-=.*- .-.-:.-•. -:',,."'',,.. ? ,,„, - - :.; , ,„.,:.".:. ••• ,... ..•% ,' .:•;r:„,..,1:-,:•.•-•i.,,,• ,,.,.71,;,, :•,,,„.... .4-'-;..! ::,•.....'t s't,..•••• : ...••• ,...77'!..„ ,t,•;;;;If'1,•,ig •%'•'', 1 . ".:•-- - ',..', 4::....! ..??.., 4'15•:'.."!:" '.!7 .. ' ; - . '''''''.7.':.•''. .P.-:; • ..- • • . .,'....'•:-..g.'.1., ,. ...:!••'1,...,:.::.M., i _... . „ 7.,:ialfiliaiiiiiiiiii.).::1.: :.;i:;:iii;_l'i,,,..1.%WI- . ....:'__", Z_".6••'....-L'A,z •. -Iv:. .- • ',''..'gtq,.. : •_VAlt:•.11,:,_..'.%.:1.112,:....•;...,..6 :• 11. • .k • -.. '.. 1 ‘,..,, .. „ .... ..• ..: Cr) al) 73 c = 75 0 cz v) 73 C(13 cB V) v(10) (1) I V) 0 (11) W C46) +NJ U Simon (300) E Sir= v4mari) 0 00100111 > ar) - E ....c Gi) ,.... v) .J............. .-,:.::..: ›,,, F---- E cn a) D V) 0>Ne -:-r.:!.: imiC >41 iL,...... E 0 .... ro o L.,... ro ,.... i6lizi,,' . .:::,: ›.., +-a D ../0 E ..., win - ,, ,, Ul '.. ' 00.1 V4) 0 iiiiiiiiiiiii .1 al) E c ( , • ..,:.„:,.. ,; : (10) ....•: ..:..... : ,..... ,__, •••::•:.:• .. . i Um_ CM U .,. < . .. . „ ...... .. . . .. .• . . . „ . „ 0 a . . .. • • 4 , r Vil 0 4 ` •- t _. ; a= � ea.. e fix} { ; a u r _J • ;11...._%ski 0 _ = Qu, f %kilt* ''' -°1 {"t c 1� ,) 0 Z U a :" #1, ... ,.,,, .„ , ,,... ...,..j...__ .,,... 0 . ,„ ,,„ .. , di...4.... _ i . ., ..._ .,,. (.....„::;„iit i 10 r „00. 0 to tIkt It u 0 a ,,,,. � :4., zt 0 Sr...i... i ire '.* rt , I it Nowa, w' ■ • .. ' 0 .a .tit; ' jf:',..:,,,:,::,,,,,,,,',',:iz14,,;‘,T,.14,t h TJ O E k m v ......,„.,, ,,g,, , , _.. ,, _ - f,:.:.•✓ • ,v, ,,, ..,...:.•• .. .: , = . • • 4 1 Y: w< •R •••• * "• — fit— .,4 aF (M� 0 . .441:7' it c r S..®. ' .Z.41.1.44;;; : .1'F M e , :',' ' Ai • ::: . . ,. , ,,,,,• • :: 4 1 ...... ma . .:. . 4 ,, lit ,, .. ,i Tom • ,j n:-_. , ,,. .,. .. 00°1" . • Of/i .*;•,,,,-' lio , ' ' t::11 • ' r ....• ' I ` .t.. ..„, , ,, ..:,...,.. ■ .p r :.. .,,..., , ...:It .. ,,, i IT i,„.,ft t t.. < " .s" " r(>t , oc:. 0111,:. Vo � 1, lip a 2^ •r ' .. .µ ,:: >64‘ 4.0 4 0111111118 IIIIIIIZ . �....I V' V) N4 IMMO 4....) i C10) 73 r4.4 (13 (11) ft +NJ le■I Linn at .....e. (13 ra Z ID kJ V) :.' .." •• 0Sel) CO Cr) ""Ct I NC ao) • i.4.......0 i A ti cu ...,. ........: .. si.... co) c „ lc, . . 0 ...., ..ip,„:, ...,..:._ ... . .._ cre5 -a E 14‹, rs.4 . ® ,...... ..._. 9 • IE.,: , c .� 0 r) .73 0.. c ryl D .,. Owit D (IN T-i (N3 in. 0 ,.... .„. ,, ("N >4. k......) . ..„....... . ...... .:.,. h _,.., c . .. :. U µ,. .r I ' ■MIAIMMM Cr) Wi CZ 1 0 MUM CLIO +IMP 41.6) SIMMEIN Cli 111111111111011111111111 0 II CD .............. (13 --rwrrrr * Ci.-:1 Vi) >1 1,-C —to to (1110) Ca 13**) 4....3 E A Tr = C Lam " C II wrflami) 11111+mos kilimmomo C kiiii 41 X C 24,-':::„L.q'.-.wf, sm sw L) rt ' I ' »' ; "h s m, a » j;.5-0:'-' r'; O »• V s; n car CZC :: :.,-:.::'.;::: '. . ::;','•:*:,,.4'--1',..''''''' *'' 1., c' ca cz (1) 1 , 1 1 7 I M , O , * ....7 ei to., , • •,.. % .. ,, Vik Lti % i.,. C ,4. ... F. Iter a c 0 -. 411 1 -R14"11t- 43 U h. m ... Nil 'It if) a.pki- *.: 3 — (4., it 1P;41.k. g „- - . -... .._ .4,. 0 IJ 0 41 'Ig 0 4,0 '13 DP 4.4 4. ..,..... - ....,; 0 _ i ,,,,_ ci 44 .. 6. :4. 40 -E -- 40 44 )4 .k., › 1,,,, ci c , a 0 21 4 z a ....,-.€ 4'... -°- n ,,,,,. t'Id 700 c 0.)°4 60 i V. i,,,,,,,,, +,,,, •,. s,,,:,4',, ; 1 a, 4 -1 '00 kir'i a), i L ti 0 m E = 03, a . ,, %.,. to -a} c ct. e -.— ...1g 1-.1 6. \44% M 6 0 #11. 0 05 U ill 1 : r 1 0 th.. c 2.........-. ..- ..-, fa. 'ICC nci kr ix ..., 4) 00 r 44 , ,, ,,,i c ..,. .- .. .... . - --,,,, ; ,... — alm•5 (:)`,, 44 4:1 4a iillt., ,„,t. i.liiki, , , yt, i4 6.. ilk smk AOa i, „___.j11-”' ' ,0 ...« 8 . .0111 ' ..`; - 44 xl.if tt ce ii .6 , t .4 '' : , 4* '"' i= t" •..,...,.. . , „.. . . . . • • Aii llik. : .•••• . ,•- ' .: - •• ...... •• 00...1'\-- •... •... .:•..A...:::::..„.. • . .. .„....",•. .v:.•;..r..i ?-0:; Gi •i. .....• ...L- • .. ..11: . 41*. , 4 .' • ' 110 ... ...... •••••••, . • .47! :. ........... .............. ... ........,..,. .,,.....,.:,:,,.,:,, .., _,..w.„...m0p*o*tssot..toIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :':' ".•'.1.:.•.:":•4 7. :• .4r14.,...:!.••••••1:i:::::;I.• .fr.2-••.:•:•'..n,,iiit:: -. ... ',WI:::':;:::::jeii•D:. ..,t.„...... •,o ..• . A- ifte..<0.411:: ..mw,,WAit. = I '• . . ., ....., .... .1. . • - ., .kAl'ir?,,,;:r......;!..•.:,.:1f 1 . .... . . ••- ••, . .... .... iaIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIj":' .:;:;.......:;:... .•:••er'249113111M'' ''''""'''''',:VVIIIII :.:...... . . 1 .,.....A.,•,,;.,.. . ... ........, . . .. ..... ,..,, ..:... . : .,......,:„ . ...... ,,,,, .,:: . 1 :::::::::::.......... . . . 1lIIIIIuIw• • . ::.. . . ...• . .,..::,,, .„:_ • . _ . , . ...... _. i • . .. . - .. '33'•3' 3 Of.*"' ''"1'°'' - , „ X « 3 4,,.._ ;333 -'''• , «.33 ' 3 ,334' 3331'1" .1,1;':::":‘'. '..3 '4••'- #• 3.3,1 „ ......« •,... ''•'3'3.3;$,33 . ' • " • •.:.• 33 33 ,....,,,,... 3' «„ 3,,-3 „. • . 3,;• " • 4.;;;....t: iii,,,, .....:: 4 . •Ik , '1111:1: - , 4' •, . ' '' 3-4• ■• . , <'.•'''.4‘ : 1 ••' ''.:•..:: ` .63'.4'z' •••,.....e•if.4L .•..,•„::: • :1. A r ...,,.......:..,,, ..t,'• r ...... ., • • .:,. ....:......• 4440', * . N- : ., CIIIIN ...... •.. .. • ... .. .,..;.:;:;;;:u1:::::N:..b.•,,:ki'i.. •• ••■•• Ilk ' g.:.14411:;..4*. ' ' „...- '4 .. • • • '• ' • '..:.. ..,•`.:. +:', Ill .- .:::.' . ' . ' ' . . • .• : It • PI ° 4''','.-', • illi• • : .C.-7., . •!ir, - . . , .. ..., 10. ..... .^,. 4....4i .„ ... ...,. ,.. _. 4i?•iir R.-• ,- -- s ':\..:;;::::: . .. • "....Y.' .::•r•-•--4* -AK . '''' t.• ''-::•,:i*.' ' .-:' . is . : ._ —„, w ,,_. "Klitt..., ...it 1 • ':-- --:, ' :.- *111.11rti.i....!,..„,::.,.:•-• r- ,,.i : ''': .r-•'.-...,..1.,- "'"z!.•'.il6::,'''''''---- .-:.,', :4+ * *Ni ill**.•' 'I." : ca ' ,•,..n.fr.„ f__`!": ., • ..11...: , , ... -1 - iwAtE...• 41,.:.. '.. ..,....ft,,„ . ' ................ -.,......a,.. ••;'...'::.!:......i.:. :I ,. : *tai*;.; —•:;; ...: ; .§ * AISIMIN, -,..- ....;.:1.:•;::,1:1,.......... ill *•, ' 7„.11, ., _ , '114444 .. .. ., :,%.• • ,'' - , ....- .....,.., . ... . , .,.......... , ... ..• • 1 .: • • :.;. .N• .,:.•'41.) ,....,, i„ l Iii i r!, .. .:„ ...:::::„:„.:. , ,,,!.,,,,,, ,, „.,1,,..,,,,,,,,,4.,,,„,ot,,,,:.,.:::vii.:,:„,10....:,.....,:......,..,::.,,,.:.. .. ,...„....,. -..-,--- .... .,:1, ,.- _, . .,, ,,,,;,:-,,,..-,!,,, , :.:it,,,,i,,,,,,,,r,::4t.21,,,..„4:01..11.40,,4-..,.. . , ,, , . ,,,‘ ,,,,,..,.,, _ ...in, , ,,, ,, ,, 1,,,,--,i;c:,,,,,...,,,f,,,,L,..A...„(:,:,;:s4i.0:.,,,,,,,,:,,,,r,:iiiii::4:::.;: q• 4F x� s �s �. � - ye. � Ztiq. a2:.�-•• _.r. M s } 3i '''''''44'...w'''''''''' l'%'ill''''.*:'''' .*1"*. ''.• pA, 's ,4%;;Ilt:::,;(.:,:.;::...b...,:s..t,,,,,:........... (114'-' .1...,...::"..."..,.....,..........,:.•::' (:::. . st y • 0 ta ,- ter,. ii ■ • . . mow w..: - r . .*'.:gig — AMP illkPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIiglIl ._.. a - .„ , 3 aim , 4 $ / 1 * k 4134 . yy ..,' MI6* ir 1 4 i 4. , 1 , , A., . ,4...7. . t., b.:iv- , „ . • Al. , , . , 4. .., _ n k_.: 1 0 ;,..:.. YEA 1: it -, . 1' . . i t ;:T tical 4. ' 1111111111111111111111111111111114 111111111111111111111111 _ ' E 11111111. • C amine 4"W° CS �@ ii illmin, S 4€ LCPG i bS!t Y n u..1 ilim M d,u. A _ 3 , . ...: '° t , iii cD 'r. • Ids ?" ., . i ..�.,..P,.....«. .. , IiiiiMi 1; i. Ili ii a a~F z +� '.: x r 1111111111111111 : • a < „ .» . 4 :'ems?•` - , .. :404 ...:,.., L O..: 1.,:4.,::........ i Li I .. ...".,,,'„k‘ '."n. "year': s. -......:-,;=...n.,;:. • GI (Al') .immm' IC (441 U - ,... E • - 1, 1 7:'''.:::: rt4,5 ad) cli)1') ..c . - ,k1; ..„ ,... „„.„. ....c 4.-.0 .,. , ..,.„., ., ..7i.,.,„. Lt.) . .. ' . , , 1:1- ,•i , .„, '.,-,..~,;.,;.., . .. 1 — 1 .., „...;,..... ,....Z......kliiik..:. tt'''':•.: Co) ..,„........... ,, ..........,........,„. .. ,... ''',:t, .,,,,„,A.1..-".•:•;1'itir‘ . - ...vi,'';,,,,,,t...:::.i .,....',::; •.:v; 'i' • 4 .. ,.,_ ,,,.....,...,..- . ,..,.. ......„...„ I :„.4%,.. . 446w'.,,,, .- ......- , ..,.:, , . . ..., ,....,...„..._ ..............,, . , .. ...,„„i 0 ,...1.„.......„... . F "n gf.li1.1 C ... ,.., I A V i U a:5 ..... , „........— , , C:r)• 01° ' . , .. w ,, . — ' - ., ''''.. ,. ...0 \' ' ---n,'"-• , —.,., 1 '' ..._„,*,,.. I,:,;•'=' It.”,"'"'"' 11F . .......,,.. . ,,. :,.,.,4A',,,':',1.....*,0 .4.:.. ...,„=.1 Q.) Nj .„.,....... .,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,....,„:„.•.:,:,,,...,.....,- , ' A 1 , i , . , .......,„__,, _., ,„*.......:,...;. , ... ,..........,.,„. :,..,„. .1.: „...„....:.:.,7,.,, , ...... ,..4.....1wts../.....is ; Ei, N., ,„_...,.. .„,„,,...• , . .. > .0 i .. ,,.....„, ti, 14-, ...I, , ' t ' . 0 .., •-(:), .N,',N4 .'..•.'.. 1. '4 ' ' C . (I1Z3 , ... ...„..,..4.4-%''''' le (1:5 1* aw•g:::: ,„.... 4... .1% , %Ammo. ' ' los+womo , . ,;.-,.!'i 13 4."d .... ..„:„:0,...„... -.•::: , ' AF::::-.- ' -'',. ;1'........f.7."..?-''' ••••' ..;11 , - ,,.- (4 - - C. eill%iiiiMel •;., ! (11A L .: ',...:........ '.!. . ...:::.,',. ... .,....,,..- . ,.. ,.: ....:,:.... ,!, . E., vil ...../ V Q,) ,,.... ,4........ E (e)1 W o'''''i .....c +-J ....c ._J ,,, iti ,,,,,,...., 1.../•‘') L,.., a,l) 1.... , ,..., ,, ....c „ .„ . , ,, .„., .„,,,, z , . „., , ....,....... ,, 4.-1 D ' 0 :.� 0 (PCS A Cilen ,00 4, , . '''''''<.* * '-''' CL's • Q '''''' > ‘,„, , ,, ,41:4 ' ,,' 7 _i_i , - ,, ..... 3 n:3 ,...c --,:,-• vF,,,,,,,,,,Alt ,.., ..kI :Fgs.,,,,a.fontg#11111:11fih4;i1.,.. ..,.,ti,,,,,‘ ',••,,-,.:,:::: ;•',' ,',4,14,, -""'•'•kr'lit74.'ittl1;t'''',..:.:i;,. !.. i•I''''•:•*--It'-,,f;, 1=1,;:,gil.. . .,,,•i.:::: iiiiiil!.''''''''',4.t7l'.ii..,;',.::4).--,:....:<---1-.‘,.:.,.;:::,,,: t,.,N,,,,,,,,,,,,',ii,-,„0 ,,,,q.,m,-,,,,.:1*.vki.,.g.....,,,,,,,,,,,,..,,,,,,, ..:,1-,e1::,g,:::::::.....,,,..,. ....„„,.. , :1,„,..1,,,, k •-'.., .,.;:' ,,, ';',, ',',;(--..-7..it..4,4,....k,, w5140.. -1.144twq.j..:.:.......,,--,., :......?: ' ' ' '7,4,4014VIt-00',A,111k4,--4X:j.* .f;': -..':.::: ' •,:,,,,410'-::,,,,1 -1,,),,,,;.tiii t), ' ilikketkikk',1440.:ZW,'; --''.. - '.--- ''''.1::;'•,NV ' ;;.. .r',' .-'-'",-... ,..r 4 „„?...4:. !f',!:.Ui'... :...;::;.'.I., ...............::„ if ! 1P ‘41411, '...... ..... . .A , , . ....., 4fie, ...............,„ .. . . , Aii& ........„.....„...„.. „..,. ., ir . , . . ...<, .. 11, .. ro ......4, , . .,, IT :,./. t , . ..:.„..., ... , ,,,........ . ,,,„ . ,, , :.... ,.. . - -- .,., .. ..:... ....,,,. ...„.,.,, ..., ‹.51 . . ..... ..,,... . .„ . .,.. :.,,, : . .. . . .. . „ i:. ,........ - .,..t. *1; .:‘,,,:„*„.......:..,51i..3. _„,....:...,....!11:.4,.....:.„1.:.;.......::::.....;:..........„..:.t.:.,,,,,x1,. 1.-,- ....:6;:::::•..),;;',','.,-;:',:.:.:.4.•• . . .. 'IN• '71,, . .*, . ;., --,,,,,', • A,.,•,' • ,,h,• .-4,,,3..:',*•,,,r:"•.'•r••.•,••...•.:••.:..::::. - ......::::;::::::::- . .- IIASN.:,:,;:.,.?,...v: .......,.... . ... . •....1.. ...p.,, ,,,4,,,,.•,1,.;:.,.•,,,.:•,NT',..,°• f , . „, ,., ,. ,,. , . .„,„„:...:....„,.,. . !',,, '-':*,'''.'''' ,k,42mNw', ,.: *lft' '-' ' '"",i, , . A,. , . .. , , , I i ' , w i t'i • k • ^fig"1'' ` �; VbilAi lir '41 , ,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,, ,,,,,, ,.,,,,,,,.„,.,,,,,,,,,,, ',,,,,,,. a x 14 �E I fir& 1 Cik: l I . '- r 1 � 0 1 t ._ ,.., . k *101,0111 ,,„ h (, ) 9 g ,g kd £ I ,atitot, (13 74.... ‘,...., v) c3) . , , . , , , ,, ,„ .. ‘, ,,, ,., , , , , ,, ,,,,,,.,_,,,,,,,, ., ,, ,.„, „,,,,,,,, ,, .. . .., ... . . . , „ „ .. . .„ , , ,. .. . , , . 0) „ . , , .. ,,,,,,\,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,„7,„,,,,,,,,,„, ,,,,,,,,,„,..,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,...,,,,,;,,,,„„:„,,,,,,,„:„.,, r (t. )1-.5 ,,,..,,,,,t,-,''''''',•'''I.' ''''''',''''.„..,'',;:,.''r,''''.4,-W,7(-",t''',,:f•''' ',';''-.,.',$:',1'..:,'''':,i,-4.:,--,-,2". ...... , Loom 't 4a) 1, n .,,... . ILE ,.,. i . , 0 . ,itit ...., ,;„.2.1..,90,...0.,,,,,,, ,A J „ .rrwrr ✓ - ' stioser- 73 IC +1") e 1111111111111111 Low • ink Lim . 1 tts1. r; 7:3 .• ' ..:1;— 4 r • Q0) .. . :... . . , ..,....„. ,...... - ti4:7) .. . .t. . OW) . .._,...,*1,,,, ' . . Y 1 .: t. k. r�.. iY 'I .y FAG•• 4 • •':'''V,,"F sg Pb IMO . meeme. Jr.A V X. , •"W...!:: 0 lirellois ao) . .. ... ........„....:4 ... .._ ... _ _ ...1111111A. 11111111. . ..' - ...W.. ...... h• E • ■1■1 V) CD ri M >,.. . • ci) Sri+ ' `- ;r . lio ` !...,,,e w R is i • • 1 p P.- N k • ■ :,,:.. `/'rte■ :,-,::''•'�. • k' , e.i^ J. , E ..,.....,,,,:„.,_ .0 . •. . #r k ,. Y '• tii •:x_ -k>` r .r : J. • ..• . tai.: A- likilN ., _ &.. S- 7 lig, .k'. X73'�l. : is illc., . . i,e � .'�� .:.ii(aYsY to i f • N.. .yi+ T .P:c • 0 • • >II aol) • .ter C 41 ao,) „ • .. .. fiz . .. . ..• . • . ...,.....• . ..„ •..., MS , ,. ,..., ..4 • , . ao.) • . .,,,• „:_ . . .. :. „:„...„...:.::••:„..;....„... .„,„„....-...., ...„ , ....0 .0.: . • ,:: .* . f.. , ...... . ... " . , . ,„. . .,. ...,...„...„:„ ....„. u .„. .....„... .,../,-,,, - ''''''''' t.. ,.., , . . . . . 4.1 ., ..• ... . ,.. . 4 ..,, „.. .,..,,, .... .. . , . • 11,0) . F . .. „. • .. , •.‘ -00 E ....,• . . . .... • • . _.: ..., .. ........, .:..... ..., 0 * ili , 0 fi xN ,,, Ait.,,,, tip . l',','' .::‘ >41 1:! rr.. 0 0 , a-li:".5 rii (3) ...,..,‘ , 4 ., 4....) .. ,, ,,,,,,..,, . „,,.: . . .... .....,..... ,..........., . ,,,,.,‘;-,,i,l,P. .i.,,, ,,. ,,,I,F',' Y Loom. a) -,' - -,, ‘ , ',..,,,,,,,;.,..,:.,..,.,:. ,...„:,,,,„,„,,,,,,,. ,,, ...,..:..,:..........„,,,,...... ..,,. ,. ..‘,..,,,,,,,,,.. -,.....:,...,..„.:.1.,::,:v.:,;:.-..-..---..,,,,,,-,--.,.-,-, .---,: :, a a o w � n 0 ai,..) , , .....,„ :,-,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,,,,,,;;,.:,,,i,‘ . . ..,1.....„: . . ... ..... ,,, . , . . . , -:,;::.:,-.,,,,,,-,-„, .,.: ,,,,, ,,,,,,, !.,, „.., z ....c • -,•.. ...., ... . , , , ... . , v ,,4t,,,,,.,, , ,,, : , .. ''' "'''''' # 'w ' '''' '''''' ,,:,,, w , 1 . . ,... . , r r p 0 T ‘,4,1,,,,,,,,,,,,,,iel lt" d� awe �f 0 f f a) E 0 V) �` r s f.,, 4;,.J.„ 1 l ,,,,. .,, .,,,„ . ''#4. ;:ss°;.*:4*‘-',- I' 4:2 �i/ ,.. cn 0 �� `V/ D 0 D 0 ,,.":',,,4 a , ir g 'T, ,a�.„ .,, it ,,,:,',‘,,,,,'.‘ i ‘,,' , j 1 V , .' { n � d F Ry£; i , •°e e x 99 r 1. e r li .. . -< .. - » r. v ter.. .... - , k ik 4 viii%:‘ *pi .� 1 2 1'' . ' 9 -el,. r r A , , ., _ , . ._ ' - - - ' ,.. . . . .. . ..._ , , t .. ., .... , , . ... Y tni i ark ANIr ...4iit v .. . 3 IN ir - i M.. . '1C .. it: ,I. 4 k:''''' •4 I a 11P1- :11fr jib' .' *171:'� tr ko 'r r,.•, ' l . -44'4!t 4,40. a s. • 486,.. i TT .r lib k t „lib i dhir .,„. 4 ,....,.."...... * . 4- -. i 1:;,:!‘ 5i 1 , olio ''11011111P.4 op r hp„,,,,ter 1111 *It. *,,* ‘.4,140 ,.. catr5,,,,,,.,,,,,i,,,,, ,,, ,, .. . ,,,,�' M ‘ , ...„ , ,,,,,, ,, r. ‘,.111w oosorlimor *, .:_. ,.,.,., .. ,. . _ � .. 1, np f` **`� ,,k l';,:-; _ qp Vim ita k ' I ,.... ‘ ., ,,,. ,,,, , ,,, ..i:::';1, Lilt ,, '''#4, - ' '' .1'... 7**-„:''''',-° ,,,,,1":"'"'"H„-,,,, ifeliii0 o • W � may uui iii s, ' s' ' ,,, ,,,,, ,, .., .. ,, IR o F z 4. it4 ,z,',., y . T 0 taz E kN t ":4%''' .146 '''.4111' BLS a. ack• 04-14' cri1155.1 %JP vi a uri ' GJ iPENE D � E • GIP CL, ammlimCD CO KO >11.11 Jir..) 141141 Ci.) Z r0 (1:N4 4004 a) 4..1 0 F w . :- r%4•0 0#1 CO4PD tr. 0 0 7" 0 .: 1 rEZ:...v..,romil C4.0 \Ivor >111111 .4 NV, 1.......; 17")°, 4.9 ,,,,,;;;.' "'T.::.:H7r.l. rj riiiii '4.3 3 rt "� ,,,,z:.::::y 4. '''''''' kihaliit, .- a� 1. n i"Q c": i_ —i..< r 4-3 v; N L f6 r),' O C v) +.3 (1) (1) • --- a. 0. C E4-3 ""L:um C 2 2 0 (i) 4_, su ft) E •+1.j " a_ < AL) (01) t � ako) cu O (1) V) (13 ft3 1441 130) (3) '65 O � � N o (13 c E ) akoOUQ) v, +.3 u • •-•1 I 0 C tzu o cu ta.) " C IE" C " r" LN.: a), L.L (3) (L) 0 lira' €` „.„4:: , ..,,,. , . -,44.41..zr -:,,,,,, , .,. , ..., , ,, , f� F s i tea` LIM s- ',. �'m1,1' ''.. LI) 0 a) . !it; , '4:4 ' 0 VI) D >4%1 II 0 111111111111111111 10::::: E E , 4„,,„. , ....,,... ,.. ,,,. ,. , .... 0 r1:3 ,IIII O � 5 0 £ x �y> a,F ,,.... 0.,) Ct.. a ' _ . b�.. a . _ 11:::e t Y: 4 , x �f ri.o'r. (1) , 4 C 0 1.".. u. E v) • ..,, ,....,, (i) „,,,,„ • momoomi u i � . ... , ... ' _ , , a I, . ,..., , . - , :, , ... ,,..„, .,,,,,,,.,„„,, . , , ' ,,, .,. , „,, ..,„ ,,, ,, ,:,.: . , ‘ , § ppd,, a) Q ,. ‘, ,. ,, v) ,,,,,,, ,,, 4 ,,,,„,,,,,), ,.... • kid ';;,,q ,,,, , „ 4,...4 C0' • ..... Y t CV Iji * # M ' '''''''''‘' I lit(PI IF y � a c 0 V) >PS*1.1 as °r _. • , :w_ a - Qi Clow Clow .!,1 , ‘:::: ', ' ?' 1 73 v) ri ) .,...0 ,:. . ::: , .. i ,,...... , , ., •, . . FF* 4;14. 073 aiii) cl, a • i iniCi , , '6',-" , LI) , 0 2 .ice C11411big) ' ''' i , . I A....A • 2 .v.,,, , „ .. . .,,,.fr,....,, (1) „- IV,. '' , 0110) ■ a) Ct..° 0.*:1•1 rilliNall . } 'sue vl � T la) .;„.,-. . 0-, vi ..7.. I. ....., ,,,,,,,,.;,,,,,,.,,,,,,.3,,,,.,..... k Yi 4. .s g � k„ ate., a.,,i) it. , '.11,\ ,.4.,i,t 1.q.>.:.:,;..:...A.:..:,.::.:::...:; fi „ :., b'^ ' 4,-'' ' i . A Q.,) ., . .:.. ., *,„. , .„,, :z. V COit.': '''' '''''''''''.***,,,,.,„ a amorromi r c .. �.t, r. ... 1 1. �� 9 „I. ....., ,. . .,.. , „... ,..,. , ,,.. ,. ,,,,,.: ..,:_,,,,,..„.„ ,, :::,.,:::::, ,,.:, , .,., ..:::,... . � �. a.... } Pitt , . .....„.„......„ ..: .... ,. :.,.,. „ : and -t,. 4 + ' «?c \ `1 d iS �,, $ 't - .. it x r t. 0. • i.';;e ... ,....„r4,1,:.••••.,,,„........ • r' u 3 s: •[.*':';r.: ' ,•. • r . V & r H 4: X40` . l w ' • ;: $'„ "10 rwa."." : ,01. ate.. • • vi) c vii) (10) um) 61:3 D > cs* v um,1 op LLJ rum . as) 1,... w LLI C ..... I I Ct. 0 > 0 (110) � m � CD Q 0 O c 73 Q ,.....% „. t.. ..i. § 410 , • W C * - €,=. ? 47:, ......- , . -,. E .- › .13....1'..*-44r- w..„...3„.., , :: 43 ,...:-.) , - ,,- 06 "c4, C .... .... .9.. cc° ,., : :::i , ..1 1 ..... ww.. I C I , , .0.'lltlk il 0 a ill filt i...) 0.7,,, 0 1114 E . e ? 4 .,17a F I i 12 ) ea LI- °. 44 t.t1 ...„„ ..e oe* 9.4. v":1 °E 46 *00. 00 t ,',Att - 2 6's' * -Sm. 4 t (zi t t rtil mr-L" iZ 42' r its ,.., › fyq *.! H FU litt Ira. rei >, lio 1.4- CI' to,k L a ra•I '§', 1 t:4 4 ..0 wi 0, as '1414 c 1.08. = IBC' i e.0) Ili Wks 1/40 0'2 '"' 144 , . ...., L1/41 1 i 1 Mit. ,„„1 R1114. 01111141 41,1 4-4 kr, I (13 , m ...I ,...„ , t. ..4 ,)4 r4 C.60",;40 1, ' ' 47r1R: *LW" = ,pt, 4'14° .. • v., 4t Z' 11°)* a — . r4 r ... mill. . . 't 1 t > ' --,--Aftt J. .,-.1 rt 14 E 2., +3.4 <11 .;;; r-1 e,•-! ;414'.. 3,... .Z4 0 4:::3- a) 4..0 ,..... r- CL.,1 (....) 7.-: A.... cz, ,a;:, V .{... a 'ad Lt"./ —, t_. . .u..., ... 01 0 1-4 a —. —' EY Cis) _„....2) .iczz7P° Z. * irs4.1 E ,..... , , ,,.... ,,,...,, ‘,... CO .... , 4 I 4...i§,,,.1 0 < w w 8 . ,. ' , •,,, .4..6 2.... $.1 ...c, ... , _ = 0 ':"... r•41^+L r= 4 .-- . , - ', -o-,' >it 10 ' .:--- '' cp a.) . i i 1.... .— = Lc) „,.._ „ _ : CIZ 'X .,„ ....,„, •+""J (..) `,-1 Cift,S = C—) .a.., It .*: et, .....,, (i) t , yr a ....... ir 115 , — 42 ,„- \,...,...._,,- . . I . . , . , t.'4,.. 0 0 '- : ,,, LA 1... ;4:, '721 u Ct. 4,i 0 40.40 P -i, "-Ct 03 0 .liBMW 40* ali..... '''''''' -' :'' N ■ V "..' .''''' ''''' ,41 t4i ' 4,4 • kJ .., re TJ . . .. ' ' r , < „,.,,v 3 ..... u ,.. ,, to '. ' L.L.41 eg ..... — „ , ., ,.. ,,„ , ,,„ , .... ,, . , 1 ' '/''''' '' ■ s, , ,, ....„, , , , , .c . .0 , k ........ 0 cL. 5 I:1. '''a ..- di .- c "0 -'0 ..1 t. ,,c, ft: . ,... .- ...:7? ..r .4.. ...... WINN* ;4114.*- s..4 .°? U It C4.1 C LO et ' ....... 4,1 1:7,1 > ... ..... c 1.,.. i”, .7 .,..e. -- • ..'' ,.., >. 1,11 (10) ..0 T. ...,, ...v. wto• 4) sam. ., i,... 0 'e. Z ' e•-. ..,...i.... .... 0 i. 4.4 ,... ' ,,,,,,,,,./4.v.,.......,....... airs• =110 HI" tiliPla Illg1:1 1114111111, ii i > 11"nl.° • . . .., Clime iriLif mAt4011. ■K, ...„,„. 'tr-e . vol4 ..,ic . , c# „ 1 „ . f ,,......4 , ,,v..,,,,,,..,,,,,,, 4-0 , ..,,, 1.3,,,,,i ,, His s:0,.... Q......., •!1■;;;11 401:C , A 41* ; $1401 ICC O ti) E Q O iti 0 6•00+006 ec ..,64,„, ....uyil c: 2:-:- F riii• (0 To t 0 Lao ‘1,1 A -44-1 1 :1°,k 3 40) w E 0 = 0 0 0 Q„,) :0,1, mil trill = 4„...100.* iit:i !Nit. 41) ...1, : 4 1 4, g, v2 • Iii$ = %viola 60.100 ill" risii 02 4. S ....„, til4:11 to) ipLii 6 ! r'd 000 Wow 0 riiii'll +1111 Loll 41111111 ill °mill " xxl k.Ci 17461' Iiiii ill 0 0 C ' '2 o x: c50: i *6! ■rr �rr t Ce R_ .401e • � -r%h c � a. � ���i��i .„,:,i„.. � em� rr ,may --: T'.1' '''- !:.'I:1'E' :ci 114.'''''''''*'''''j:"' limi _lc. >44i tan a) 4-4' c13 Cri > '7r 73 (1) r--1 1..., Li- c .: 0 la) il. D 0 , *A--- .....0 (1) "-- TA 1... 14-mi 0 . , C 0 v) (u ...... "in- c a) _lc ro (04:u L... L.) 4.3 73 1-1-• 0 U wailm L.... D -0 " � CL N C LL � +- D CI p c >1 +-L. (1) O O a. 4-3 N " 0 (13 E D , cs3 0 0 (T3 oft) .c E a a) 0 u s+7; vim) (pc rig .4-ca efts" 0 (6, (11. 61:5":,; ..:402.0 0 ri) > issia -10 r(12 riNC: CD 4-sd C (1) "Cn- rt3 (13 E a (3) C � o 4%.00.‘ - f3's °3 ‘,*., /1,, ,,j, i �� s .1 • I ' \ ...,„„,... r. 4.. ,,,,,,..,.....,:.,,, , t„,,,,,.. .... .,......._./ , 4 e�Y 41 'I;;';:::::, Y:Y g i. S am���. � �- h', � ,"�:,`���- .111110 ,,,,,,. „,, 4100,N iota..1(ii= /',-V:r:r.,;Z :zn?;,r;,” ‘,11„., 0 z , C: - .,,,.'v,,,,,,,- '...,:... .,,.i.:$0,,,,,, - -....:1, cm; , ':" -° 2: ,„„teo ,0 ' , I. . ‘ it,j,,,-) <it< --'1/44 (IN; ,,,..;" i , 1 14 ,, ,,.. .! , .. , .„,. , 0 . . .....,,,., k „ ilP ,4 1 Ir.:, 1,0 N 4 9 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P1 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. . Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00337079 2013/06/05 ( WINZER CORPORATION 40.32 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 65.55 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 133.07 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 314.77 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP 00337091 2013/06/061 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 281.27 AP 00337091 2013/06/061 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 138.53 AP 00337095 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.58 AP 00337095 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 27.18 AP 00337095 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.58 AP 00337095 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 31.07 AP 00337095 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 49.73 AP 00337095 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 27.18 AP 00337097 2013/06/061 AIRGAS USA LLC 208.18 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 92.00 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 288.49 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,533.63 AP 00337116 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 64.05 AP 00337116 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 57.88 AP 00337116 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 83.30 AP 00337116 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 68.56 AP 00337116 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 93.12 AP 00337116 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 79.87 AP 00337116 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 29.04 AP 00337116 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM.SERVICE 28.67 AP 00337116 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 27.48 AP 00337116 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 59.35 AP 00337116 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 53.58 AP 00337116 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 39.58 AP 00337116 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 66.08 AP 00337116 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 29.05 AP 00337116 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 57.88 AP 00337116 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 48.87 AP 00336656 2013/05/291 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 518.40 AP 00336660 2013/05/29( ALL CITIES TOOLS 65.72 AP 00336675 2013/05/29( BURTON'S FIRE INC 221.31 AP 00336675 2013/05/291 BURTON'S FIRE INC 108.99 AP 00336682 2013/05/291 CALPERS 6,267.50 AP 00336682 2013/05/291 CALPERS 219.71 AP 00336683 2013/05/291 CARNES, SANDY 103.63 AP 00336685 2013/05/29 1 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 244.04 AP 00336685 2013/05/291 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 120.20 AP 00336685 2013/05/29( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 16.98 AP 00336693 2013/05/29( CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 50.00 AP 00336697 2013/05/291 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 183.06 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P2 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336697 2013/05/29 I CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 22.77 AP 00336719 2013/05/29 I ESTRELLA,JESSICA 20.00 AP 00336734 2013/05/29( GRAINGER 69.54 AP 00336739 2013/05/29( GT ENGINEERING 796.46 AP 00336751 2013/05/29( HOSE MAN INC 78.15 AP 00336751 2013/05/29( HOSE MAN INC 38.42 AP 00336751 2013/05/29( HOSE MAN INC 158.68 AP 00336752 2013/05/29( HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 9.48 AP 00336752 2013/05/29( HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 14.08 AP 00336759 2013/05/29( INTERNATIONAL EZ UP INC 1,566.00 AP 00336765 2013/05/29( JONES AND MAYER,LAW OFFICES OF 145.00 AP 00336771 2013/05/29( KME FIRE APPARATUS 429.66 AP 00336771 2013/05/29( KME FIRE APPARATUS 81.44 AP 00336771 2013/05/291 KME FIRE APPARATUS 40.10 AP 00336771 2013/05/29( KME FIRE APPARATUS 23.81 AP 00336771 2013/05/291 KME FIRE APPARATUS 60.48 AP 00336771 2013/05/291 KME FIRE APPARATUS 872.34 AP 00336774 2013/05/291 LARKIN, DAVID W 120.45 AP 00336774 2013/05/291 LARKIN, DAVID W 101.70 AP 00336775 2013/05/29 I LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 12.85 AP 00336775 2013/05/29( LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 99.72 Ap 00336775 2013/05/29( LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 49.11 AP 00336777 2013/05/29( LICHTMAN,OFER 20.00 AP 00336786 2013/05/29( MARLINK SA INC 27.00 AP 00336786 2013/05/29( MARLINK SA INC 135.00 AP 00336793 2013/05/29( MOLINA,GINA 27.14 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 400.69 AP 00336813 2013/05/29( PATTON SALES CORP 1,407.83 AP 00336817 2013/05/29( PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 315.00 AP 00336821 2013/05/29( PROFORMA 919.81 AP 00336822 2013/05/291 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 4,322.95 AP 00336822 2013/05/291 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 17,651.31 AP 00336822 2013/05/29 I PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 5,615.90 AP 00336822 2013/05/29 I PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 520.47 AP 00336822 2013/05/29 1 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 2,661.85 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 2,730.62 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 16,970.54 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 438.56 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 3,215.32 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 52.05 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 17,416.89 AP 00336822 2013/05/291 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 4,255.20 AP 00336822 2013/05/291 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 277.82 AP 00336822 2013/05/291 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 8,455.39 AP 00336822 2013/05/29 1 PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 243.68 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P3 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 81.40 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 4,004.03 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 7,778.14 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 17,143.27 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 17,501.61 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 17,574.77 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 34,918.91 AP 00336822 2013/05/29( PUBLIC AGENCY SELF INSURANCE SYSTEM 17,078.92 AP 00336824 2013/05/29( RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIA 102.20 AP 00336827 2013/05/29( ROBERTS,CHERYL L 125.00 AP 00336827 2013/05/29( ROBERTS,CHERYL L 125.00 AP 00336833 2013/05/29( SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 344.80 AP 00336835 2013/05/29( SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 105.00 AP 00336835 2013/05/29( SAN ANTONIO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 105.00 AP 00336836 2013/05/29( SAN BERNARDINO CO EMS OFFICERS ASSOCIA i 60.00 AP 00336837 2013/05/29( SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 1,435.17 AP 00336842 2013/05/29( SEGAAR,AARON 282.50 AP 00336848 2013/05/29( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 48.74 AP 00336848 2013/05/29( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 160.66 AP 00336848 2013/05/29( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 197.02 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,253.27 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 774.34 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,459.05 AP 00336860 2013/05/29( STAPLETON,JOSHUA 21.41 AP 00336864 2013/05/29( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 37.00 AP 00336864 2013/05/29( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 42.00 AP 00336864 2013/05/29( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 40.00 AP 00336864 2013/05/29( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 37.00 AP 00336864 2013/05/29( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 37.00 AP 00336864 2013/05/29( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 37.00 AP 00336864 2013/05/29( TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER 48.75 AP 00336882 2013/05/291 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00336883 2013/05/29 l VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 543.00 AP 00336884 2013/05/29( WALKER, ROBERT 20.00 AP 00336886 2013/05/291 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY -138.23 AP 00336923 2013/06/051 ALL CITIES TOOLS 85.50 AP 00336923 2013/06/05 ( ALL CITIES TOOLS 202.40 AP 00336923 2013/06/05 I ALL CITIES TOOLS 173.59 AP 00336923 2013/06/05 I ALL CITIES TOOLS 99.68 AP 00336937 2013/06/05 I CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 157.40 AP 00336937 2013/06/05 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 77.52 AP 00336943 2013/06/05 ( CONFIRE JPA 23,951.43 AP 00336943 2013/06/05 ( CONFIRE JPA 19,161.14 AP 00336943 2013/06/05 ( CONFIRE JPA 4,790.28 AP 00336948 2013/06/05 ( DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 1,714.45 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REGPORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P4 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336948 2013/06/05 ( DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 844.42 AP 00336948 2013/06/05 l DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 666.29 AP 00336948 2013/06/05 I DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 328.17 AP 00336948 2013/06/05 I DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 326.78 AP 00336948 2013/06/05 I DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 160.95 AP 00336951 2013/06/05 I EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 56.16 AP 00336956 2013/06/051 FLEET SERVICES INC. 12.18 AP 00336957 2013/06/05 FLEETPRIDE 799.09 AP 00336957 2013/06/05 ( FLEETPRIDE 393.58 AP 00336958 2013/06/05 ( FONTANA RADIATOR SERVICE 1,649.81 AP 00336958 2013/06/05 I FONTANA RADIATOR SERVICE 812.59 AP 00336960 2013/06/05 ( FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 105.62 AP 00336976 2013/06/05 ( HOYT LUMBER CO.,SM 4.08 AP 00336976 2013/06/05 ( HOYT LUMBER CO.,SM 15.42 AP 00336976 2013/06/05 ( HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 26.23 AP 00336984 2013/06/05 ( IZONE 771.00 AP 00336986 2013/06/05 ( KME FIRE APPARATUS 48.80 AP 00336986 2013/06/05 ( KME FIRE APPARATUS 45.20 AP 00336986 2013/06/05 ( KME FIRE APPARATUS 99.10 AP 00336988 2013/06/05 ( LIFE ASSIST INC 949.77 AP 00336988 2013/06/05 ( LIFE ASSIST INC 105.14 AP 00336988 2013/06/05 ( LIFE ASSIST INC 677.99 AP 00336995 2013/06/05 l MG ENTERPRISES INC -1,734.65 AP 00336995 2013/06/05( MG ENTERPRISES INC 34,693.00 AP 00336998 2013/06/05( MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 335.83 AP 00336998 2013/06/051 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 6.47 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 l OFFICE DEPOT 12.86 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 982.37 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 I OFFICE DEPOT 31.52 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 I OFFICE DEPOT 4.08 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 I OFFICE DEPOT 166.94 AP 00337007 2013/06/05 ( PARKES, DR KEVIN 10,000.00 AP 00337010 2013/06/05 ( PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 2,616.00 AP 00337013 2013/06/05 l QUALA TEL ENTERPRISES 627.80 AP 00337013 2013/06/05( QUALA TEL ENTERPRISES 309.21 AP 00337018 2013/06/05 l RAYNE WATER CONDITIONING INC 26.25 AP 00337019 2013/06/051 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 789.00 AP 00337026 2013/06/05 l SAN BERNARDINO CTY 5,029.15 AP 00337026 2013/06/05( SAN BERNARDINO CTY 4,023.32 AP 00337026 2013/06/05 1 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 1,005.83 AP 00337032 2013/06/05 1 SMART AND FINAL 68.82 AP 00337032 2013/06/05 I SMART AND FINAL 91.76 AP 00337032 2013/06/051 SMART AND FINAL 51.57 AP 00337032 2013/06/051 SMART AND FINAL 51.57 AP 00337032 2013/06/05 l SMART AND FINAL 267.19 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P5 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00337032 2013/06/05 ( SMART AND FINAL 50.39 AP 00337032 2013/06/05 ( SMART AND FINAL 93.72 AP 00337032 2013/06/051 SMART AND FINAL 50.39 AP 00337032 2013/06/05 ( SMART AND FINAL 26.96 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 95.90 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 64.26 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 31.64 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 69.07 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 28.71 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 68.16 AP 00337034 2013/06/05 ( SOUTH COAST AQMD 116.61 AP 00337034 2013/06/05 ( SOUTH COAST AQMD 116.61 AP 00337034 2013/06/05 ( SOUTH COAST AQMD 116.61 AP 00337037 2013/06/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 624.05 AP 00337046 2013/06/05 ( SUN BADGE CO 115.65 AP 00337048 2013/06/05 ( THE INFORCER LLC 4,160.00 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.25 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 480.19 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 480.19 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.11 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.11 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.11 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 132.35 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 132.35 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 480.19 AP 00337064 2013/06/051 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.25 AP 00337065 2013/06/05 VERIZON WIRELESS- LA 1,878.53 AP 00337069 2013/06/051 WALTON, KEVIN 25.00 AP 00337070 2013/06/05 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 641.34 AP 00337070 2013/06/05 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 641.34 AP 00337070 2013/06/05 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 213.77 AP 00337071 2013/06/05 ( WEST COAST LIGHTS& SIRENS 137.81 AP 00337071 2013/06/05( WEST COAST LIGHTS& SIRENS 279.82 Total for Entity: 359,013.80 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 P6 CO f > v m 0 CO n 0 N w a r c• C r N CL. O p N Q 0 d' Q O T W O O 0 0- O 6 .L.. IL 6.2.r' E N C co f > 0 a O to= n m m ¢ m° O 0 a a t � E a f O N t7 r d W 0 W 0 4 O O N 0 0 0 0 u) CC >W 0 0 0 0 CI 0 CI TL 0 U_ T n 0 0 0 U nE c 0 0.= O P '— 0 0 0 O — 0 E F r r w q« Lo a a > 0 . m > w 02 _ 5 $ c 0 0 0 0. x E H ,^n o r+ Cl 0.a m ^ 0 N N 0 0 Q CO E M O 0 N 0 Za N Q ^ In O O C O▪n�n O 0 0 0 N O ci C 0 N N 0 O N E 0 r =X O. d N 0 O j O OO n 1°n �w 0 VI a O O p N- O 0 Y co 0 r.: 0 W m> 0 N 0 a co 0 r co O 0 ✓ r--- co- (V N 6 -r, y L N O P O 0 0 0 U) C Q — N N N a V E Z. O ^ 0 . 0 d t0 a> 05 O m - .- O N in o, E.Q O N ✓ C 7 N 0 ao of o d 0) CO U) F N. to c c O O M "' CO t rya 0 04 0 0 0 N N a 0 U Cl. I/m O �•yyO CC� 0▪ OI 0 N O 0 N r Y N- eu t oi L_ C L C 2> o O .- N b CO 0 0 TU u 6 {k. r CO m in 0 cc ILL in E O In O N r N Q 0 I\ /� O N O 6 c 0 V iL r r 0 0 _�// U a 4L C O R co a e� C c 3 0 L z 0▪ 0 W E O 0 a 0 W N . ONI O O O CO A f0 co cn co N d q N. 0 0 0 r m C Cr N N L U 0 > n 0 0 0 0 m o c ' 6 _ E 0- N 00 0 u0i r m 0 LO V 9 m c Nr W 2C VC N 0 N N y t N ` d O to O N C 0 C O a O r r 2 co nc .- u 0 > N 0 >1 O 0 0 0 >o 0 f c0 0 0 U O y CO N `ycv CO T 0 1 W T1) E-, o U m 0 0 "4 It c c = a- o a 0 O 0 C 0O.... `y N //((/// W g 0 3 N U a t CO 0 • 0 YZ P 0 A U E 0 9 C K 0 . C - 0 o� 0 ~ O �2 jjyjyy w '^ c m v m O v_� — c VO��✓1 ..�D�W C p �' y VS. C O) �. 2 LE a) O 0 C au LL d• ?' m Vim° C Ud E m .0 0 0 c at'yy"' E m v Q a E �D CO CO drn .>_ 0 fn r m • Q 0 Z c w 0 > '� E 0 ." i 5 I` 3 '3 m ar aci r E S w 0 0 a 0 11 2 � U a f H 0 < W .< > _ c P7 L'S 01 em 0700mmm 0) way 0.1 'C A o O o 0 0 0 o O o o C < co W 90 N N N N N N N N N R r A q m Y o O r o O O o LL Fi m 0. 2 0) C N m 0) C) N O E f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W �1 r O t 0 W O O ✓ n m O V N V V V 0 O ' O Q O O m 0) m r r 0 N y co r r 0 ct ff N N O ' � NO O 0 N O 0 0 0 0 C) 0) Al N N 9 7 9 9 9 9 9 7 O O O O O O O O — O O 0 A co CO A CO CO A CO CO - < Baa < 8 < 2 S O 0 f N O N 0 0 0 O O O O O V rd O 0 C.- 03000000 0 A A N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 a O O N N co N N 0 0 Mel 0 /..- 0000 m 0 0 3 0 0 CO m o v o O o o N m C) 0 m n o o aoi o 0 0 0 0 6 m > 0 0 N. n 0 0 N N N O C O O O O 0 O O O 0 O O O O n t- o co r 0 0 0 O 0 O O O N a A co O O 0 0 N N m 0 0 m m CO O m 0 D o m 0 m Y O Y O O O N O N N N 03 O N r - O N N r N C) N N O N N O d N n A N N 0 0 0000C/ 000 0 O 0 N 3 m m 0 0 O N O 0 0 0 0p 0 N O O O To r n 0 0 O r 0 N 0 N 0 V r n 0 • r A O O O O 0 '- CD 0 Ti r n 0 0 r N 0 N Ni Co 0 r ry N N O f O V N N j m m m 00 0 0 r 0 0 r N O P m O m m m O in 0 0 0 N N 1f ✓ O r N N r r N N O N N N O n• W om — C C y d E G « E�1� N C W M 0 N m 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 °o, °O 0 m Q CD ' r q r n O O O O O O O O O O O O O n C O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w l6 — O r n o 0 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n C C , N `A r n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n a a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 N N 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 N 0 0 N OC H r 0 0 N N O N N r N 0 N N O N N O L '� M Q a N n a C m A • o ° 2 0 LL • A A 0. N CO N C) C) CO CO N Q 0 c W 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O 11L ❑ N N N N N N N N N a N m o m m O N CO N 4 N a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 m ' m m 07 0 N N a 0 A Cd -, Z m m m a n °m rt Qm LL O m a' N N O p F- O N Y Y N H 0 a- 0 N r W F. ! Q Q Z Z Z W Z Z z N 0 C N h U 2 o. C 0 z z z z << I z ¢ o o 0 0 0 0 0 1- < F 0 C) J J J J 2 2 w < < W W W W < W U A o 0 0 0 0 < 0 C A 0 ` z m m < < O O O O zz rn w m m W E W E LL LL S 2 2 S Z Z E H E m Ttl A ° w a U J W W W W W W U J ° LL ° ° C Z C C J C c U A W A A 0 J 3 o LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL wwwwwwww O 0 O a ' a it N 4) f) U) 0 3 C 3 rE LL O 0 O al t O _N U 0 r 0 N 0 0 O CO r 0 O O O Y) O 0 O O O O CO CO N C 0 3 0 0 0 • m v > a 0 0 6 C A — 9 r 0. C 0 rn C A 01 CO C 0 ` O < co r oZ N N ry N N A 0 co CO 0 0 Y J LL F C n a ¢ 0. m a m $ E W `m W w 0 07 00 0 7 0 :u m 3 0 > 0 07 0 M M M M n 10 n M 3 o 0 0 0 J 0 V 0 LL N N CO 0 N m N CO f n C 3 C P £ .2 \ | a t \ 5 ) § 0 5 o |! ! > \ CO 0 0. v. 0 j co X00 ° oo § & eQ _ ■ MI to ) � CI e7 � � 01ac aoor } ttE § a a =0 L O. 0 co o co en 0 0 ill ea c | en 0 ± = a ( ) ' D > C k | k CO a co U 0 \o cal 0 el CO D ce w CL PS o co ca LL co 2 > O ni o zm 0 u Ce a s O. 0 N q q fl N N C 0 0 O Co CO A N CO To M N h 10 n Co - Co N N a a A O V N OI v. N N N r O N O V N N % N 0 O N N 0 0 0 0 N CO q O O 00 10 O O O O Co a ; O O m m O O O O 0 G@ O O 0 W 0) Ea 6 o vi h Co a'L= 00 00 O1 °f 0 CI' N N N 0 N I�I O 0 0 0 O O O O O dN. O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 ON 0 0 ON CO M L 6 0 0 N N 0 0 N 6 o 0 li0 N co co i Of 0 0 co Q_ N d O N N OI OI 0 0 N •� M co) in N N p H y M o da T R o 0 Tg 0 c T orn CD c6 CO 7 m o O q O O L. 0 .55 g0 N Ott Co O N M C 0 CO ara0 - o iii //Q� N O O O U �y e yr N 0 ,- O O O O E 0 z 0 LL E Z a w Z F Z - O Q Co 0 LL U Z LU U a0 ? U Z1 LL CO 0 LU 0 ; z o w = s s 2 E a ? m a a -t L a E N 4N , ' Z C 3 m W I', .0 0 Z W ! C J t D 0 LL o C E 0 at C a 0 b 3 C C 3 LL 3 > 0 N O N O 0 v U N F O Q O CI .- 0 o A d N 0) • 3 0 C C Y ry N 0 co 0 q a 9 co a t O O 0 U A m C O1 0 0 < N N N d N 6 a a s °o a °o E _ CO o .v m y 0 y 0 y E vOi 9 co C o m m V J N 0. (% U M LL M 2 3 C P10 Argiarkit STAFF REPORT tal RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT LeP RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Don Cloughesy, Deputy Fire Chief Pamela Pane, Management Analyst II Subject: APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE AN INCREASE TO CONTRACT NO. FD12-002 IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,000 TO WLC ARCHITECTS, INC. AND APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 02 FOR THE EXPANSION OF ORIGINAL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE FIRE DISTRICT CAPITAL MAINTENANCE PROJECTS PERFORMED AT THE AMETHYST FIRE STATION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROPOSAL DATED MARCH 8, 2013, FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 3289501-5300 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the Fire Board approve an increase to Contract No. FD 12-002 in an amount of $30,000 to WLC Architects, Inc. and approve Amendment No. 2 for the expansion of the original architectural design services for the Fire District Capital Maintenance projects performed at the Amethyst Fire Station (171), in accordance with the proposal dated March 8, 2013, funded from Account No. 3289501-5300. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS During the process of reviewing what capital maintenance work needed to be completed at the Amethyst Fire Station, it was determined that a much more comprehensive remodel of the station would make it most functional. Modernizing the offices and living quarters will better define spaces for daily operating activities. Separating work spaces from sleeping areas will increase crewmembers productivity, as well as wellness. Replacing and reworking HVAC equipment will increase energy efficiency. The vehicle exhaust system will also be replaced to enhance employee safety and wellness. The work to be performed will increase the life of the station to gain an additional 20 years functionality from a 40 year old building. Staff recommends that the Board approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. FD 12-002. Respectfully submitted, Mike Bell Fire Chief P11 • STAFF REPORT RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PRO I ECTION DISTRICT ) • RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director `.? Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FIRE DISTRICT JOB CLASSIFICATIONS RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Fire Board adopt the attached resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2012/13 salary schedules for Fire District job classifications. BACKGROUND • The Fire Board has previously adopted salary schedules for those classifications employed by the Fire District. Periodically these schedules are updated to reflect changes in salaries, additions and deletions of classifications and changes in job titles. This schedule includes the added full time position of Fire Captain Specialist. It also includes a number of additional part-time classifications added to provide more flexibility in staffing and to comply with CaIPERS requirements that in order to staff a position as part-time it must be listed on a properly adopted salary schedule. Attachments 1. Salary Schedule for Fire Union Job Classifications 2. Salary Schedule for Fire Management Group Classifications 3. Salary Schedule for Fire Support Services Association Job Classifications P12 JUNE 19, 2013 IJ. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT I J5. Approval of a Resolution adopting Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Salary Schedules for Fire District Job Classifications. RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014 THE RESOLUTION FOR THIS ITEM WILL BE DISTRIBUTED ON MONDAY, JUNE 17, 2013 June 19,2013 City Council Meeting I Revised Version: Tues.,June 18, 2013 I ITEM J5. Approval of a Resolution adopting Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Salary Schedules for Fire District Job Classifications. P12 I RESOLUTION NO.FD 13-031 RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the District that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, the Board f:A Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District has previously adopted salary resolutions that established salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached salary schedules for the Fire Union, Fire Management Employees Group and Fire Support Services Association. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , 2013. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, Secretary I, Janice Reynolds, Secretary of the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, at a Meeting of said Board on the day of 2013. Executed this day of , 2013 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, Secretary FIRE UNION ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO MONTHLY PAY RANGES July 2013 Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Fire Captain A 6,707 B 7,042 _ C 7,394 .. D 7,764 E.- 8,152 Fire Captain Specialist A 6,707 •B 7,042 C 7,394 D 7,764 E' 8,152 Fire Engineer A 5,717 B 6,003 'C 6,303 D 6,618 E 6,949 Firefighter A 4,996 B 5,246 - C 5,508 D 5,784 E 6,073 Fire Inspector A 5,717 B 6,003 C 6,303 D 6,618 E. 6,949 Field Training Officer • A 6,707 B 7,042 C 7,394 D 7,764 E 8,152 Stipend Step Amount Step Amount Step,Amount Step Amount Step Amount Hazardous Material Stipend (5%of Fire A 347 B 347 C 347 D 347 F E 347 Engineer Step E) Paramedic Stipend (12.13% of Fire Engineer A 843 B 843 C . 843 D 843 E 843 Step E) Canine Stipend (5%of Fire Engineer Step E) A 347 B 347 C : 347 D 347 " E 347 Field Training Officer Stipend (9.3% of Fire A 758 B 758 C 758 D 758 E 758 Captain Step E) Fire Union July 2013 FIRE MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO MONTHLY PAY RANGES July 2013 Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Fire Chief A 11,950 B 12,548 C 13,175 D 13,834 E 14,526 F 15,252 Fire Deputy Chief A 10,295 B 10,810 C 11,350 D 11,918 E 12,514 F 13,140 Fire Battalion Chief A 8,973 B 9,421 C 9,893 D 10,387 E 10,906 N/A (56 Hour Workweek) Fire Battalion Chief A 8,973 B 9,421 C 9,893 D 10,387 E 10,906 N/A (40 Hour Workweek) Stipend Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Battalion Chief Training Officer A 573.73 B 573.73 C 573.73 D 573.73 E 573.73 Stipend (5.26% of 40 hour BC Step E) Fire Management July 2013 FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES SALARY SCHEDULE AS OF JULY 1, 2013 A B C D E COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 Hourly 1,950.59 2,048.12 2,150.52 2,258.05 2,370.96 Bi-Weekly 4,226.27 4,437.60 4,659.47 4,892.44 5,137.07 Monthly EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 34.90 36.69 38.56 40.53 42.39 Hourly COORDINATOR 2,792.07 2,934.86 3,084.95 3,242.72 3,391.59 Bi-Weekly 6,049.00 6,359.00 6,684.00 7,026.00 7,348.00 Monthly EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 37.51 39.38 41.35 43.42 45.59 Hourly ADMINISTRATOR 3,000.67 3,150.71 3,308.24 3,473.65 3,647.34 Bi-Weekly 6,501.46 6,826.53 7,167.86 7,526.25 7,902.56 Monthly FIRE EQUIPMENT APPRENTICE 18.58 19.51 20.48 21.51 22.58 Hourly MECHANIC 1,486.16 1,560.47 1,638.49 1,720.42 1,806.44 Bi-Weekly 3,220.02 3,381.02 3,550.07 3,727.58 3,913.96 Monthly FIRE EQUIPMENT LEAD MECHANIC 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 31.12 Hourly 2,048.12 2,150.52 2,258.05 2,370.95 2,489.50 Bi-Weekly 4437.59 4659.47 4892.44 5137.06 5393.92 Monthly FIRE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 23.22 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 Hourly 1,857.70 1,950.59 2,048.12 2,150.53 2,258.05 Bi-Weekly 4,025.02 4,226.27 4,437.59 4,659.47 4,892.45 Monthly FIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 23.14 24.29 25.51 26.78 28.12 Hourly TECHNICIAN 1,850.93 1,943.47 2,040.64 2,142.68 2,249.81 Bi-Weekly 4,010.34 4,210.85 4,421.40 4,642.47 4,874.59 Monthly FIRE MARSHAL 43.93 46.12 48.43 50.85 53.39 Hourly 3,514.19 3,689.90 3,874.39 4,068.12 4,271.52 Bi-Weekly 7,614.08 7,994.78 8,394.52 8,814.25 9,254.96 Monthly FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST 24.49 25.72 27.00 28.35 29.77 Hourly INSPECTION I 1,959.35 2,057.32 2,160.19 2,268.20 2,381.61 Bi-Weekly 4,245.26 4,457.52 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.15 Monthly FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST 27.00 28.35 29.77 31.26 32.82 Hourly INSPECTION II 2,160.18 2,268.19 2,381.60 2,500.69 2,625.72 Bi-Weekly 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.14 5,418.16 5,689.06 Monthly FIRE SHOP SUPERVISOR 30.72 32.26 33.87 35.56 37.34 Hourly 2,457.74 2,580.63 2,709.66 2,845.14 2,987.40 Bi-Weekly 5,325.11 5,591.36 5,870.93 6,164.48 6,472.70 Monthly MAINTENANCE OFFICER 34.92 36.67 38.50 40.42 42.45 Hourly 2,793.57 2,933.25 3,079.92 3,233.91 3,395.61 Bi-Weekly 6,052.74 6,355.38 6,673.15 7,006.81 7,357.16 Monthly MANAGEMENT AIDE 24.01 25.24 26.53 27.88 29.16 Hourly 1,920.76 2,018.98 2,122.24 2,230.77 2,333.18 Bi-Weekly 4,164.00 4,377.00 4,601.00 4,836.00 5,058.00 Monthly MANAGEMENT ANALYST I 27.88 29.31 30.81 32.39 33.87 Hourly 2,230.77 2,344.85 2,464.76 2,590.81 2,709.76 Bi-Weekly 4,833.00 5,080.00 5,340.00 5,613.00 5,871.00 Monthly MANAGEMENT ANALYST II 32.06 33.70 35.43 37.24 38.95 Hourly 2,565.09 2,696.28 2,834.17 2,979.11 3,115.88 Bi-Weekly 5,557.00 5,842.00 6,140.00 6,454.00 6,751.00 Monthly MANAGEMENT ANALYST III 34.90 36.69 38.56 40.53 42.39 Hourly 2,792.07 2,934.86 3,084.95 3,242.72 3,391.59 Bi-Weekly 6,049.00 6,359.00 6,684.00 7,026.00 7,348.00 Monthly OFFICE SERVICES CLERK 16.85 17.71 18.62 19.57 20.47 Hourly 1,347.98 1,416.91 1,489.37 1,565.54 1,637.41 Bi-Weekly 2,922.00 3,072.00 3,229.00 3,394.00 3,550.00 Monthly OFFICE SPECIALIST I 15.25 16.03 16.85 17.71 18.52 Hourly 1,220.00 1,282.39 1,347.98 1,416.91 1,481.96 Bi-Weekly 2,645.00 2,780.00 2,922.00 3,072.00 3,213.00 Monthly OFFICE SPECIALIST II 16.85 17.71 18.62 19.57 20.47 Hourly 1,347.98 1,416.91 1,489.37 1,565.54 1,637.41 Bi-Weekly 2,922.00 3,072.00 3,229.00 3,394.00 3,550.00 Monthly PLANS EXAMINER-FIRE 32.08 33.68 35.37 37.13 38.99 Hourly 2,566.22 2,694.54 2,829.26 2,970.73 3,119.26 Bi-Weekly 5,560.15 5,838.16 6,130.07 6,436.57 6,758.39 Monthly PUBLIC EDUCATION 27.00 28.35 29.77 31.26 32.82 Hourly SPECIALIST 2,160.18 2,268.19 2,381.60 2,500.69 2,625.72 Bi-Weekly 4,680.40 4,914.42 5,160.14 5,418.16 5,689.06 Monthly SECRETARY 19.09 20.04 21.04 22.09 23.20 Hourly 1,526.81 1,603.15 1,683.31 1,767.47 1,855.85 Bi-Weekly 3,308.09 3,473.50 3,647.17 3,829.53 4,021.00 Monthly SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE 24.49 25.73 27.01 28.36 29.77 Hourly SECRETARY 1,959.30 2,057.26 2,160.12 2,268.13 2,381.54 Bi-Weekly 4,245.15 4,457.40 4,680.27 4,914.29 5,160.00 Monthly A B C D E FIRE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 23.22 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.22 Hourly 1,857.60 1,950.48 2,048.00 2,150.40 2,257.92 Bi-Weekly 4,024.80 4,226.04 4,437.34 4,659.21 4,892.17 Monthly FIRE CLERK 10.24 10.75 11.29 11.85 12.45 Hourly 819.20 860.16 903.17 948.33 995.74 Bi-Weekly 1,774.93 1,863.68 1,956.86 2,054.71 2,157.44 Monthly FIRE PREVENTION ASSISTANT 10.24 10.75 11.29 11.85 12.45 Hourly TEMPORARY/PART-TIME 819.20 860.16 903.17 948.33 995.74 Bi-Weekly 1,774.93 1,863.68 1,956.86 2,054.71 2,157.44 Monthly FIRE PREVENTION TECHNICIAN 15.25 16.01 16.81 17.65 18.54 Hourly 1,220.01 1,281.01 1,345.06 1,412.31 1,482.93 Bi-Weekly 2,643.35 2,775.51 2,914.29 3,060.00 3,213.00 Monthly QUALITY IMPROVEMENT 27.79 29.18 30.64 32.17 33.78 Hourly SPECIALIST 2,223.20 2,334.36 2,451.08 2,573.63 2,702.31 Bi-Weekly 4,816.93 5,057.78 5,310.67 5,576.20 5,855.01 Monthly EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 41.14 43.20 45.36 47.62 50.01 Hourly QUALITY IMPROVEMENT NURSE 3,291.20 3,455.76 3,628.55 3,809.98 4,000.47 Bi-Weekly 7,130.93 7,487.48 7,861.85 8,254.95 8,667.69 Monthly • FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES PART - TIME SALARY SCHEDULE AS OF JULY 1 , 2013 A B C D E COMMUNICATIONS TECHNICIAN 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 29.64 Hourly FIRE EQUIPMENT MECHANIC 23.22 24.38 25.60 26.88 28.23 Hourly FIRE INFORMATION SYSTEMS 23.14 24.29 25.51 26.78 28.12 Hourly TECHNICIAN FIRE PREVENTION SPECIALIST 24.49 25.72 27.00 28.35 29.77 Hourly INSPECTION I MANAGEMENT AIDE 24.01 25.24 26.53 27.88 29.16 Hourly MANAGEMENTNALYSTI I_ 27.75 2916. So-.66 32.22 3387 Hourly OFFICE SERVICES CLERK 16.85 17.71 18.62 19.57 . 20.47 Hourly OFFICE SPECIALIST I 15.25 16.01 16.81 17.65 18.54 Hourly OFFICE SPECIALIST II 16.85 17.69 18.58 19.51 20.48 Hourly PLANS EXAMINER- FIRE 32.08 33.68 35.37 37.13 38.99 Hourly CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P13 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00337077 2013/06/051 WESTLAND GROUP INC 650.50 AP 00337080 2013/06/051 ZEE MEDICAL INC 163.80 AP 00337080 2013/06/051 ZEE MEDICAL INC 141.95 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 71.30 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 244.05 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 414.26 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 218.58 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 405.02 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 156.97 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,705.63 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 55.20 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 178.73 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 309.54 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 897.51 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 119.28 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,985.60 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 383.47 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 445.84 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 251.94 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 178.37 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 244.56 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 129.47 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 324.15 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 145.04 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 219.17 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 159.74 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 281.06 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 244.52 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,689.40 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 206.83 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.97 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 755.47 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 61.55 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 721.62 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,171.58 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 540.54 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,463.96 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,647.27 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 73.60 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 63.34 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 727.22 AP 00337085 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 389.06 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P14 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 142.01 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 170.75 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,085.04 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 337.13 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 182.52 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 465.44 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 215.92 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,085.38 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,203.72 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,130.73 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 313.59 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,677.77 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 138.60 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 887.07 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 64.97 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 217.00 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 184.49 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,820.12 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 2,352.02 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 415.64 AP 00337085 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 679.15 AP 00337087 2013/06/061 FORD OF UPLAND INC 61.73 AP 00337087 2013/06/061 FORD OF UPLAND INC 968.56 AP 00337092 2013/06/061 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 253.80 AP 00337092 2013/06/061 MWI VETERINARY SUPPLY 1,024.88 AP 00337094 2013/06/061 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 181.55 AP 00337094 2013/06/061 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 401.25 AP 00337094 2013/06/061 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 1,073.02 AP 00337094 2013/06/061 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,714.56 AP 00337094 2013/06/061 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,724.58 AP 00337094 2013/06/061 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 5,644.00 AP 00337094 2013/06/061 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 4,569.60 AP 00337094 2013/06/061 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 702.89 AP 00337094 2013/06/061 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 2,184.55 AP 00337094 2013/06/061 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 20,088.07 AP 00337094 2013/06/061 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 14,406.68 AP 00337105 2013/06/061 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 581.45 AP 00337112 2013/06/061 SPINITAR 6,211.40 AP 00337114 2013/06/061 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 513.02 AP 003371 14 2013/06/06( TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 5,500.00 AP 00337114 2013/06/06( TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 550.00 AP 00337114 2013/06/06( TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 1,891.60 AP 00337114 2013/06/06( TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 538.84 AP 00336655 2013/05/291 ABM JANITORIAL SW 173.25 AP 00336655 2013/05/291 ABM JANITORIAL SW 259.88 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 06/12C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P15 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00336655 2013/05/29( ABM JANITORIAL SW 346.50 AP 00336655 2013/05/29( ABM JANITORIAL SW 403.15 AP 00336655 2013/05/29( ABM JANITORIAL SW 779.63 AP 00336655 2013/05/291 ABM JANITORIAL SW 129.93 AP 00336655 2013/05/291 ABM JANITORIAL SW 311.24 AP 00336655 2013/05/291 ABM JANITORIAL SW 5,274.37 AP 00336655 2013/05/291 ABM JANITORIAL SW 866.25 AP 00336655 2013/05/291 ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,645.88 AP 00336655 2013/05/291 ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,212.75 AP 00336655 2013/05/291 ABM JANITORIAL SW 1,645.88 AP 00336655 2013/05/29( ABM JANITORIAL SW 129.93 AP 00336657 2013/05/29( ADMINISTRATIVE PROFESSIONAL TODAY 89.00 AP 00336665 2013/05/29( ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES 3.35 AP 00336667 2013/05/29( ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 32.29 AP 00336671 2013/05/29( AVANTS,MARGE 120.00 AP 00336671 2013/05/29( AVANTS,MARGE 165.00 AP 00336676 2013/05/29( BUSINESS MANAGEMENT DAILY 26.50 AP 00336678 2013/05/29( CAIN,RUTH 25.99 AP 00336678 2013/05/29( CAIN,RUTH 10.22 AP 00336682 2013/05/29( CALPERS 340.80 AP 00336682 2013/05/29( CALPERS 136,321.47 AP 00336684 2013/05/291 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 96.85 AP 00336687 2013/05/291 CASCADE TURF LLC 1,112.62 AP 00336689 2013/05/291 CDW-G 410.63 AP 00336692 2013/05/291 CHILTON,GABRIELLE 216.00 AP 00336696 2013/05/291 CLARK,KAREN 837.00 AP 00336696 2013/05/291 CLARK,KAREN 288.00 AP 00336698 2013/05/291 CMRTA 25.00 AP 00336698 2013/05/29( CMRTA 25.00 AP 00336701 2013/05/29( COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 1,665.00 AP 00336703 2013/05/29( COSMOFIT STUDIOS 105.00 AP 00336708 2013/05/29( DAVITA 5,000.00 AP 00336711 2013/05/29( DGO AUTO DETAILING 165.00 AP 00336713 2013/05/29( DOWD,MICHELLE 86.40 AP 00336718 2013/05/29( ELLISON-SCHNEIDER& HARRIS L.L.P. 2,992.50 AP 00336720 2013/05/29( FASTENAL COMPANY -37.02 AP 00336720 2013/05/291 FASTENAL COMPANY 69.94 AP 00336720 2013/05/291 FASTENAL COMPANY 162.49 AP 00336726 2013/05/29( FRAZEE PAINT CENTER 13.48 AP 00336729 2013/05/291 GLOBAL PRESENTER 2,215.09 AP 00336729 2013/05/29( GLOBAL PRESENTER 760.59 AP 00336730 2013/05/29 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,000.00 AP 00336730 2013/05/29( GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 180.00 AP 00336730 2013/05/29( GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 2,865.00 AP 00336736 2013/05/29( GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 394.20 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDAREG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P16 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00336736 2013/05/29( GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 346.68 AP 00336736 2013/05/29( GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 334.80 AP 00336736 2013/05/29( GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 1,182.60 AP 00336736 2013/05/291 GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 702.00 AP 00336740 2013/05/29( HAMILTON,MONIQUE 225.00 AP 00336740 2013/05/29( HAMILTON,MONIQUE 225,00 AP 00336740 2013/05/29( HAMILTON,MONIQUE 90.00 AP 00336742 2013/05/291 HANSHAW,DIANE 83.06 AP 00336743 2013/05/29 l HANSON,SUZANNE 71.00 AP 00336749 2013/05/291 HLP INC. 28,740.00 AP 00336749 2013/05/291 HLP INC. 28,800.00 AP 00336753 2013/05/291 I A AP 25.00 AP 00336753 2013/05/291 IA AP 25.00 AP 00336753 2013/05/291 IA AP 25.00 AP 00336760 2013/05/291 J I KELLER AND ASSOC INC 383.83 AP 00336762 2013/05/291 JAN, WEI-SHU 109.20 AP 00336762 2013/05/291 JAN,WEI-SHU 63.00 AP 00336767 2013/05/29( KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 168,649.12 AP 00336767 2013/05/29( KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 5,221.16 AP 00336767 2013/05/29( KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 1,434.51 AP 00336769 2013/05/29( KHALIL,GEORGE 140.74 AP 00336770 2013/05/29( KIM,SANDY 188.00 AP 00336772 2013/05/29( KX2 HOLDINGS 280.00 AP 00336772 2013/05/29( KX2 HOLDINGS 910.00 AP 00336772 2013/05/29( KX2 HOLDINGS 4,218.75 AP 00336779 2013/05/29( LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 432.00 AP 00336780 2013/05/291 LUCKY FEET SHOES INC 172.79 AP 00336787 2013/05/29( MARSHALL,SYLVIA 912.00 AP 00336789 2013/05/291 MAXWELL,ANTHONY 57.60 AP 00336790 2013/05/291 MIDWEST TAPE 48.98 AP 00336790 2013/05/291 MIDWEST TAPE 195.85 AP 00336790 2013/05/291 MIDWEST TAPE 16.99 AP 00336790 2013/05/291 MIDWEST TAPE 48.98 AP 00336790 2013/05/291 MIDWEST TAPE 149.69 AP 00336799 2013/05/291 NBS 1,664.40 AP 00336799 2013/05/29( NBS 7,030.80 AP 00336799 2013/05/29( NBS 1,565.60 AP 00336799 2013/05/29( NBS 910.00 AP 00336805 2013/05/29 l OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 764.50 AP 00336805 2013/05/291 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 308.50 AP 00336810 2013/05/29( OTT, SHARON 324.00 AP 00336810 2013/05/29( OTT, SHARON 270.00 AP 00336815 2013/05/29 l PEP BOYS 4.85 AP 00336823 2013/05/29( RAINEY,LATREACE 255.00 AP 00336829 2013/05/29 1 ROCKN, FAKHRY 425.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P17 Agenda Check Resister 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336831 2013/05/29( RUTAN&TUCKER 1,516.01 AP 00336831 2013/05/29( RUTAN& TUCKER 2,849.49 AP 00336834 2013/05/291 SALAZAR,SONIA 500.00 AP 00336840 2013/05/291 SC FUELS 14,861.08 AP 00336840 2013/05/291 SC FUELS 13,717.92 AP 00336846 2013/05/291 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 AP 00336847 2013/05/291 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 325.05 AP 00336847 2013/05/291 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 800.45 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 6.40 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 79.53 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.40 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.95 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 83.07 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.50 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.65 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.03 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.90 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 21.13 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 51.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66,59 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.90 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.00 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.97 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.86 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.73 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 265.41 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.17 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.42 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 113.35 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.21 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24,92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.06 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 76.44 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.12 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 40.01 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.88 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.88 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,732.30 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P18 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.55 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 154.62 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 111.94 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 156.06 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.76 Ap 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.36 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.28 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.00 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 116.44 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.01 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 147.30 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.52 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 Ap 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.73 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.85 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.86 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 318.27 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 310.22 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.73 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 301.77 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.73 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 98.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.86 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 49.48 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 06/120 Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P19 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.73 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.80 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.78 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 Ap 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.88 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.78 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.73 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.61 Ap 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 213.25 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 Ap 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25,05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 Ap 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.65 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.34 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.27 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 39.77 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 17.64 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 119.16 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.86 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.39 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.37 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P20 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.43 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.16 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 130.01 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 58.01 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.76 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.82 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 46.49 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 57.33 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 67.79 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.60 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 110.40 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.82 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 89.74 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.45 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 263.06 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.17 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 50.1 I AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.24 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.65 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.65 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.33 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.73 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.24 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.65 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.60 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 37.46 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.86 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.86 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 233.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P21 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 206.45 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.15 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 86.12 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.37 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 78.89 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.65 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 95.89 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.24 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.51 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.06 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.00 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.46 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.37 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.40 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.28 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.28 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 71.86 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 59.08 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.36 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 248.87 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.46 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.73 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 47.11 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 97.39 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.02 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 28.33 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.60 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P22 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.79 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.79 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.83 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 87.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 99.07 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 52.98 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 75.91 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.25 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.06 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 363.93 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.45 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.60 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.01 AP 00336857 2013/05/291 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.46 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 29.01 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.73 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.18 AP 00336857 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.78 AP 00336863 2013/05/291 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 3,120.00 AP 00336863 2013/05/29( SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 320.00 AP 00336865 2013/05/29 1 TERRY, DONNA 288.75 AP 00336876 2013/05/291 UNITED WAY 150.00 AP 00336876 2013/05/29( UNITED WAY 1.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P23 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336878 2013/05/291 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP 00336878 2013/05/291 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336880 2013/05/291 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 613.95 AP 00336887 2013/05/291 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 80.00 AP 00336887 2013/05/291 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 45.00 AP 00336887 2013/05/291 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 45.00 AP 00336887 2013/05/291 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 45.00 AP 00336887 2013/05/291 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 55.00 Ap 00336887 2013/05/29( WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 45.00 AP 00336887 2013/05/29( WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE 45.00 AP 00336889 2013/05/29( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 362.50 AP 00336889 2013/05/29( WORD MILL PUBLISHING 362.50 AP 00336890 2013/05/29( XL STORAGE 895.00 AP 00336925 2013/06/05 ( ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.68 AP 00336933 2013/06/05 ( BRAMBILA,RUBEN 1,794.78 AP 00336933 2013/06/05( BRAMBILA,RUBEN 4,038.55 AP 00336935 2013/06/051 BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 524.88 AP 00336935 2013/06/05 I BUTLER SCHEIN ANIMAL HEALTH SUPPLY 144.72 AP 00336946 2013/06/05 1 D& D SERVICES INC. 400.00 AP 00336954 2013/06/05 I FELICIANO,ANTHONY 156.00 AP 00336966 2013/06/05 I GRANICUS INC 650.00 AP 00336967 2013/06/05 ( GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 100.00 AP 00336967 2013/06/05 ( GRAPHICS FACTORY INC. 99.80 AP 00336970 2013/06/05 ( HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 1,055.72 AP 00336977 2013/06/05 ( HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALL: 1,050.00 AP 00336985 2013/06/05 ( KEAVNEY,TERRANCE 200.00 AP 00336993 2013/06/05 ( MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 5.57 AP 00336993 2013/06/05( MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 233.97 AP 00336993 2013/06/05 l MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 1,300.99 AP 00336996 2013/06/051 MIDWAY INDUSTRIES 598.90 AP 00337000 2013/06/05 I NATIONAL DATA& SURVEYING SERVICES 3,600.00 AP 00337002 2013/06/051 NOVARTIS ANIMAL HEALTH US INC 379.56 AP 00337009 2013/06/051 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 1,070.41 AP 00337012 2013/06/05 ( PSA PRINT GROUP 691.73 AP 00337014 2013/06/05 ( RAMIREZ,JOSE J 45.93 AP 00337019 2013/06/05 ( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 5,508.43 AP 00337019 2013/06/05( RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 27,637.05 AP 00337020 2013/06/051 RJ NOBLE COMPANY -17,012.50 AP 00337020 2013/06/051 RJ NOBLE COMPANY 94,476.65 AP 00337020 2013/06/051 RJ NOBLE COMPANY 72,663.55 AP 00337020 2013/06/05 I RJ NOBLE COMPANY 2,336.80 AP 00337020 2013/06/05 I RJ NOBLE COMPANY 97,019.11 AP 00337020 2013/06/051 RJ NOBLE COMPANY 340,249.94 AP 00337020 2013/06/05 ( RJ NOBLE COMPANY -4,850.96 AP 00337020 2013/06/05 ( RJ NOBLE COMPANY -8,473.85 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P24 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00337022 2013/06/05 I RODRIGUEZ INC,R Y 253.10 AP 00337027 2013/06/05 I SAN BERNARDINO CTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORK 2,538.00 AP 00337029 2013/06/05 I SAN BERNARDINO,CITY OF 1,122.22 AP 00337030 2013/06/05 ( SAUCE CREATIVE SERVICES,THE 275.00 AP 00337040 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 161.00 AP 00337047 2013/06/05 ( TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00337047 2013/06/05 I TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00337047 2013/06/05 l TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00337047 2013/06/05 ( TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00337049 2013/06/05 ( THEATRICAL LIGHTING& SCENIC SERVICES LL 324.00 AP 00337051 2013/06/05 ( TOOMOTH,DR MICHELE PERSON 290.00 AP 00337053 2013/06/05( TUNGGALDJAJA, INGE 148.03 AP 00337053 2013/06/05( TUNGGALDJAJA, INGE 95.40 AP 00337054 2013/06/051 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 27,026.56 AP 00337058 2013/06/05 I UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 970.67 AP 00337058 2013/06/051 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC 979.88 AP 00337061 2013/06/051 VANDERHAWK CONSULTING LLC 20,175.00 AP 00337068 2013/06/051 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 51.11 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 I WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 36.41 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 I WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 214.93 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 I WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 319.89 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 I WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 408.48 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 45.68 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 I WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 247.07 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 1,281.21 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 1 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 146.77 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 512.57 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 l WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 101.25 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 l WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 63.65 AP 00337068 2013/06/05( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 161.73 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 ( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 484.20 AP 00337068 2013/06/051 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 334.02 AP 00337068 2013/06/05 I WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 247.07 AP 00337075 2013/06/05 I WESTCOAST MEDIA 900.50 AP 00336918 2013/06/05 I ABM JANITORIAL SW 45,452.55 AP 00336926 2013/06/051 ANDERSON,BYRON 100.00 AP 00336927 2013/06/051 ANTECH DIAGNOSTICS 527.31 AP 00336928 2013/06/05 ( ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 200.00 AP 00336929 2013/06/05 l ASCE-RIVERSIDE/SAN BERNARDINO BRANCH 75.00 AP 00336930 2013/06/05 l AUNTIE ROXIES LIFE OF THE PARTY 570.98 AP 00336930 2013/06/05 ( AUNTIE ROXIES LIFE OF THE PARTY 550.00 AP 00336931 2013/06/051 BANK OF SACRAMENTO 8,473.85 AP 00336931 2013/06/051 BANK OF SACRAMENTO 4,850.96 AP 00336931 2013/06/051 BANK OF SACRAMENTO 17,012.50 AP 00336941 2013/06/05 ( CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 2,005.56 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 06/12/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P25 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00336942 2013/06/05 ( COLLISION AND INJURY DYNAMICS INC. 525.00 AP 00336944 2013/06/05 ( CONTACT SECURITY INC 363.72 AP 00336944 2013/06/05 ( CONTACT SECURITY INC 1,247.04 AP 00336944 2013/06/05( CONTACT SECURITY INC 2,909.76 AP 00336944 2013/06/05( CONTACT SECURITY INC 2,961.72 AP 00336944 2013/06/05 l CONTACT SECURITY INC 5,358.37 AP 00336944 2013/06/05( CONTACT SECURITY INC 2,494.08 AP 00336944 2013/06/05 l CONTACT SECURITY INC 1,438.64 AP 00336959 2013/06/051 FOREST CITY COMMERCIAL MGMT INC. 217,927.00 AP 00336961 2013/06/05 1 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 1,664.04 AP 00336961 2013/06/05 I G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 3,370.00 AP 00336962 2013/06/05 I GALLS INC 605.85 AP 00336973 2013/06/05 I HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 194.06 AP 00336973 2013/06/05 I HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 629.73 AP 00336973 2013/06/05 I HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 88.97 AP 00336973 2013/06/05 I HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 781.03 AP 00336974 2013/06/05 ( HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 11.75 AP 00336979 2013/06/05 ( INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIOT 2,312.50 AP 00336982 2013/06/05( IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 2,254.22 AP 00336983 2013/06/051 ISLAS, PAULA 60.00 AP 00336989 2013/06/051 LINDA RYAN REPORTING 1,208.25 AP 00336990 2013/06/05 I LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 275.00 AP 00336990 2013/06/05 1 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 275.00 AP 00336991 2013/06/05 I MAIN STREET SIGNS 717.81 AP 00336991 2013/06/05 ( MAIN STREET SIGNS 99.36 AP 00337015 2013/06/05 ( RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMER 3,166.74 AP 00337016 2013/06/05 ( RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMC 4,257.43 AP 00337016 2013/06/05 ( RANCHO CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMC 6,920.00 AP 00337017 2013/06/05 ( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00337017 2013/06/05 ( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00337017 2013/06/05 l RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00337017 2013/06/051 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 25.00 AP 00337017 2013/06/05 1 RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 25.00 AP 00337017 2013/06/05 ( RANCHO REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL IN 50.00 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.75 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 54.19 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00337037 2013/06/051 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 209.69 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 117.23 AP 00337037 2013/06/051 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.56 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33.18 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 123.36 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.40 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.86 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P26 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amoum AP 00337037 2013/06/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 69.60 AP 00337037 2013/06/051 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 48.98 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 190.13 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 44.31 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 32.67 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 56.28 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 101.49 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.78 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 105.52 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 128.29 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 100.02 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,443.76 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,557.83 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.35 AP 00337037 2013/06/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,189.77 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.79 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 62.26 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 94.98 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.25 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 134.78 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.56 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.79 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00337037 2013/06/051 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24.92 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.85 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 15.19 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 19.84 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 25.05 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 115.66 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 l SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.35 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.56 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 106.08 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 26.86 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 55.10 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 60.23 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 436.28 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 14 Current Date: 06/12/: Report CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P27 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 178.36 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 38.99 AP 00337037 2013/06/051 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.83 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 63.83 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 418.48 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 140.58 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 102.14 AP 00337037 2013/06/051 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 27.56 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 74.17 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 109.67 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.74 AP 00337037 2013/06/05( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 107.72 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 72.01 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70.31 AP 00337037 2013/06/051 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 81.15 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 120.71 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 53.48 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.89 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77.67 AP 00337037 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 14.75 AP 00337039 2013/06/05 ( SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 1,397.00 AP 00337039 2013/06/05( SOUTHLAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 1,178.00 AP 00337042 2013/06/05 ( STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,610.73 AP 00337042 2013/06/05 1 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,199.84 AP 00337042 2013/06/05 I STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 12,895.89 AP 00337064 2013/06/051 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.62 AP 00337064 2013/06/051 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/051 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 21.77 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 404.25 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 144.88 AP 00337064 2013/06/051 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.11 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 243.21 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.16 AP 00337064 2013/06/051 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.16 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 88.42 AP 00337064 2013/06/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 111.16 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 132.35 AP 00337064 2013/06/051 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 118.63 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 480.19 AP 00337064 2013/06/051 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 50.64 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 43.30 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 15 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P28 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 262.56 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.99 AP 00337064 2013/06/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 480.19 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/051 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 1 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 422.07 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 42.50 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 151.23 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.62 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.62 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 804.55 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 1,773.68 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 91.32 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 20.16 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( V ERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.11 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 592.10 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 444.54 AP 00337064 2013/06/05( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 93.39 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 220.42 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 I VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.62 AP 00337064 2013/06/051 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.62 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 l VERIZON CALIFORNIA 40.62 AP 00337064 2013/06/05 ( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 90.99 AP 00337067 2013/06/05 ( VISTA PAINT 154.02 AP 00337067 2013/06/05 ( VISTA PAINT 652.20 AP 00337070 2013/06/05 ( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 290.00 AP 00337070 2013/06/05 l WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 523.45 AP 00337070 2013/06/05( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 9.68 AP 00337070 2013/06/05 l WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 106.94 AP 00337070 2013/06/051 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 371.40 AP 00337070 2013/06/051 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 537.43 AP 00337073 2013/06/05 I WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 609.17 AP 00337089 2013/06/06 I HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 10.60 AP 00337095 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 104.58 AP 00337095 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 44.26 AP 00337095 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 936.54 AP 00337095 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 100.26 AP 00337095 2013/06/06 l UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 55.06 AP 00337095 2013/06/06 I UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 860.53 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 16 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDAREG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P29 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00337095 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 1,085.25 AP 00337095 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 100.26 AP 00337095 2013/06/06( UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 44.26 AP 00337096 2013/06/06( AGILINE LLC 820.00 AP 00337096 2013/06/06( AGILINE LLC 640.00 AP 00337096 2013/06/06( AGILINE LLC 160.00 AP 00337096 2013/06/061 AGILINE LLC 220.00 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,066.42 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 4,781.09 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 1,306.15 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 141.48 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 5,698.96 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 124.52 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 594.99 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 118.16 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 311.08 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 250.91 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 216.78 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 344.06 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 607.23 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 607.23 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 940.26 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 224.32 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 346.14 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 392.69 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 645.36 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 102.04 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 234.15 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 194.96 AP 00337103 2013/06/06( CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 283.92 AP 00337103 2013/06/061 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 3,230.97 AP 00337110 2013/06/06( ORKIN PEST CONTROL 2,805.66 AP 00336651 2013/05/291 A&V SOFTBALL 2,350.00 AP 00336652 2013/05/291 A'JONTUE,ROSE ANN 504.00 AP 00336653 2013/05/291 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,011.77 AP 00336653 2013/05/29 1 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,415.40 AP 00336653 2013/05/29( ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 365.70 AP 00336653 2013/05/29( ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 170.66 AP 00336653 2013/05/29( ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 182.85 AP 00336653 2013/05/29( ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,645.65 AP 00336653 2013/05/29( ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,097.10 AP 00336653 2013/05/291 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 877.68 AP 00336653 2013/05/291 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,647.01 AP 00336653 2013/05/29 1 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 560.74 AP 00336669 2013/05/291 ASSI SECURITY 105.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 17 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P30 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00336669 2013/05/291 ASST SECURITY 105.00 AP 00336669 2013/05/291 ASST SECURITY 105.00 AP 00336669 2013/05/291 ASST SECURITY 105.00 AP 00336669 2013/05/291 ASST SECURITY 105.00 AP 00336680 2013/05/29 I CAL-STATE RENT A FENCE INC 3,841.50 AP 00336699 2013/05/291 COCHERELL, DOREEN 115.20 AP 00336704 2013/05/29( CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 686.88 AP 00336705 2013/05/291 CSTI 750.00 AP 00336706 2013/05/291 DANCE TERRIFIC 1,844.40 AP 00336706 2013/05/29( DANCE TERRIFIC 169.50 Ap 00336707 2013/05/29( DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. 450.00 AP 00336707 2013/05/29( DAVID TAUSSIG AND ASSOCIATES INC. 500.00 AP 00336722 2013/05/29( FELICIANO,ANTHONY 936.00 AP 00336735 2013/05/29( GRANICUS INC 650.00 AP 00336747 2013/05/29( HDS WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 74.87 AP 00336750 2013/05/29( HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 852.88 AP 00336750 2013/05/29( HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 41.86 AP 00336755 2013/05/29( INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIOT 1,386.00 AP 00336755 2013/05/29( INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIOI 1,170.00 AP 00336755 2013/05/29( INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATIOT 7,382.00 AP 00336756 2013/05/291 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 133.64 AP 00336773 2013/05/29 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 268.14 AP 00336773 2013/05/291 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 688.46 AP 00336792 2013/05/291 MOE,JOHN 787.50 AP 00336794 2013/05/291 MORRIS, RICHARD 167.40 AP 00336795 2013/05/291 MORRISSETTE, DEANNA 240.00 AP 00336797 2013/05/291 MYERCHIN,NICOLE 693.00 AP 00336800 2013/05/291 NICHOLS,GARY 236.00 AP 00336801 2013/05/291 NINYO& MOORE 10,390.50 AP 00336802 2013/05/291 0 A ROBERTS COMPANY 1,000.00 AP 00336803 2013/05/29 I O'ROURKE, KAREN 52.00 AP 00336816 2013/05/291 PERFORMANCE MARTIAL ARTS CENTER 126.00 AP 00336818 2013/05/29( PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 11.40 AP 00336818 2013/05/29( PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 116.07 AP 00336819 2013/05/29( PRECISION GYMNASTICS 3,445.60 AP 00336819 2013/05/29( PRECISION GYMNASTICS 32.20 Ap 00336825 2013/05/29( RAULS AUTO TRIM INC 462.00 AP 00336826 2013/05/291 RENDON, LUCERO 94.50 AP 00336843 2013/05/291 SENECHAL,CALVIN 90.00 AP 00336843 2013/05/291 SENECHAL,CALVIN 18.00 AP 00336843 2013/05/29 I SENECHAL,CALVIN 27.00 AP 00336843 2013/05/291 SENECHAL,CALVIN 68.40 AP 00336843 2013/05/291 SENECHAL,CALVIN 61.20 AP 00336843 2013/05/291 SENECHAL,CALVIN 115.20 AP 00336843 2013/05/291 SENECHAL,CALVIN 68.40 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 18 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P31 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00336843 2013/05/29( SENECHAL,CALVIN 84.00 AP 00336843 2013/05/29( SENECHAL,CALVIN 3.60 AP 00336843 2013/05/29( SENECHAL,CALVIN 3.60 AP 00336843 2013/05/29( SENECHAL,CALVIN 79.20 AP 00336843 2013/05/29 l SENECHAL,CALVIN 72.00 AP 00336844 2013/05/29( SHEAKLEY 17.50 AP 00336844 2013/05/291 SHEAKLEY 94.60 AP 00336849 2013/05/29 I SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,518.27 AP 00336870 2013/05/291 TORO TOWING 325.00 AP 00336872 2013/05/29 TRANS WEST TRUCK CENTER 657.53 AP 00336874 2013/05/29 1 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 3,642.00 AP 00336882 2013/05/29( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.61 AP 00336882 2013/05/29( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.61 AP 00336882 2013/05/29( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.61 AP 00336882 2013/05/29( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.61 AP 00336882 2013/05/29( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.61 AP 00336882 2013/05/29( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.61 AP 00336882 2013/05/291 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.11 AP 00336882 2013/05/291 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.61 AP 00336882 2013/05/291 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 19.61 AP 00336882 2013/05/291 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 212.48 AP 00336882 2013/05/291 VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.49 AP 00336882 2013/05/29( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.11 AP 00336882 2013/05/29( V ERIZON CALIFORNIA 85.57 AP 00336882 2013/05/29( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.84 AP 00336882 2013/05/29( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 45.84 AP 00336882 2013/05/29( VERIZON CALIFORNIA 44.00 AP 00336885 2013/05/29( WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 69.07 AP 00337086 2013/06/06( EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 463.97 AP 00337086 2013/06/06( EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 8.90 AP 00337088 2013/06/06( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.00 AP 00337088 2013/06/06 I HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 858.79 AP 00337088 2013/06/061 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 773.74 AP 00337088 2013/06/06( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.00 AP 00337091 2013/06/06( INTERSTATE BATTERIES 29.39 AP 00337093 2013/06/06( PENNY PLUMBING 269.13 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 14.57 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 81.01 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 14.03 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 1 BRODART BOOKS 12.73 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 19.11 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 16.85 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 19 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P32 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 15.71 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 90.40 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 10.16 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 39.58 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 10.10 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 16.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 14.60 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 14.59 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 24.30 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 158.84 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 16.40 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 74.71 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 471.18 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 14.04 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 29.18 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 66.01 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 57.03 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 15.16 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 9.55 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 13.56 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 124.37 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 28.05 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 30.28 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 57.16 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 11.12 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 143.36 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 1 BRODART BOOKS 28.07 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 l BRODART BOOKS 16.85 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 l BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 22.40 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 31.36 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 17.76 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 20 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P33 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 13.28 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 11.12 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 17.92 Ap 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 76.16 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 53.76 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 259.68 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 l BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 15.60 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 26.72 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 31.04 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 15.60 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 8.96 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 22.40 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 21 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P34 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AR 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 31.36 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 76.16 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 76.16 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 44.80 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 192.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 13.44 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 6.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 15.60 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 43.18 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 28.76 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 15.15 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 19.40 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 11.12 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 4.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 1 BRODART BOOKS 11.22 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 165.02 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 208.26 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 31.66 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 56.37 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 19.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 30.81 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 10.89 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 8.74 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 93.27 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 573.61 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 30.30 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 10.10 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 27.22 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 12.90 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 37.20 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 14.03 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 25.27 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 24.30 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 12.90 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 1 BRODART BOOKS 16.40 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 37.20 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 25.27 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 1,240.43 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 30.88 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 22 Current Date: 06/12/: Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P35 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 14.60 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 16.25 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 15.69 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 53.42 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 168.23 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 95.09 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 704.66 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 28.63 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 19.64 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 21.34 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 24.26 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 154.89 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 21.37 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 l BRODART BOOKS 21.98 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 31.66 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 196.89 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 56.37 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 51.50 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 61.15 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 15.71 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 75.79 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 27.49 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 30.30 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 13.48 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 l BRODART BOOKS 15.55 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 25.26 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 24.17 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 57.03 AP 00337102 2013/06/06 I BRODART BOOKS 15.26 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 13.56 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 15.15 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 14.04 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 30.82 AP 00337102 2013/06/06( BRODART BOOKS 31.93 AP 00337102 2013/06/061 BRODART BOOKS 13.60 AP 00337104 2013/06/061 DYNASTY SCREEN PRINTING 729.00 Ap 00337111 2013/06/061 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 1,897.98 AP 00336654 2013/05/291 ABLETRONICS 64.26 AP 00336666 2013/05/29 l AROCHO, ALMA 288.00 AP 00336666 2013/05/29( AROCHO, ALMA 120.00 AP 00336666 2013/05/29( AROCHO,ALMA 276.00 AP 00336666 2013/05/29( AROCHO,ALMA 168.00 AP 00336668 2013/05/29( ASAP POWERSPORTS 263.45 AP 00336670 2013/05/291 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 71.62 AP 00336677 2013/05/291 C.A.P.E. 80.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 23 Current Date: 06/12/C Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P36 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336679 2013/05/291 CAL QUEST INVESTIGATIONS 1,016.22 AP 00336679 2013/05/291 CAL QUEST INVESTIGATIONS 603.40 AP 00336681 2013/05/291 CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 150.00 AP 00336690 2013/05/29( CENTER ICE ARENA 231.00 AP 00336695 2013/05/29( CISNEROS, HERNANDO 300.00 AP 00336700 2013/05/29( COLUM, ROSALIND 47.47 AP 00336702 2013/05/29( CONTINENTAL AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPA 79.40 AP 00336709 2013/05/29( DEALERS AUTO TRIM 135.00 AP 00336710 2013/05/29( DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 115.00 AP 00336712 2013/05/29( DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 60.00 AP 00336712 2013/05/29( DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 168.00 AP 00336712 2013/05/29( DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 12.00 AP 00336712 2013/05/291 DOLLARHIDE,GINGER 72.00 AP 00336721 2013/05/291 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 6.28 AP 00336723 2013/05/291 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO LLC 107.21 Ap 00336723 2013/05/29 I FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO LLC 177.45 AP 00336728 2013/05/291 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 99.00 AP 00336728 2013/05/291 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 153.60 AP 00336731 2013/05/291 GOOD YEAR WHOLESALE 244.43 AP 00336737 2013/05/29( GREENPLAY LLC 7,545.00 AP 00336738 2013/05/29( GRICHER, LINDA 112.00 AP 00336741 2013/05/29( HAMPTON YOGA 204.00 AP 00336741 2013/05/29( HAMPTON YOGA 294.00 AP 00336741 2013/05/291 HAMPTON YOGA 216.00 AP 00336741 2013/05/291 HAMPTON YOGA 180.00 AP 00336744 2013/05/291 HARTE-HANKS SHOPPERS INC. 1,331.14 AP 00336748 2013/05/291 HEILIG, KELLY 499.80 AP 00336751 2013/05/29 1 HOSE MAN INC 45.60 AP 00336751 2013/05/29 1 HOSE MAN INC -34.12 AP 00336754 2013/05/291 INDERWIESCHE, MATT 1,39100 AP 00336761 2013/05/29( JACOBSEN WEST 205.00 AP 00336768 2013/05/29( KEITH,JORRY 300.00 AP 00336776 2013/05/29( LEMANSKI,CAROLYN 500.00 AP 00336778 2013/05/291 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 275.00 AP 00336778 2013/05/291 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 4,650.00 AP 00336778 2013/05/29 1 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 1,900.00 AP 00336778 2013/05/291 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 700.00 AP 00336778 2013/05/291 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 150.00 AP 00336778 2013/05/29( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 450.00 AP 00336778 2013/05/29( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 162.50 AP 00336778 2013/05/29( LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 162.50 AP 00336781 2013/05/29( MACBIRD, BETTY 20.00 AP 00336788 2013/05/291 MARTINEZ,MARLENE 15.00 AP 00336788 2013/05/29 I MARTINEZ,MARLENE 5.00 AP 00336791 2013/05/291 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 450.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 24 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P37 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336796 2013/05/29( MRB DEER CREEK CAR WASH 240.50 AP 00336796 2013/05/29( MRB DEER CREEK CAR WASH 451,00 AP 00336796 2013/05/29( MRB DEER CREEK CAR WASH 141.00 AP 00336796 2013/05/29 l MRB DEER CREEK CAR WASH 193.50 AP 00336798 2013/05/29 I NAPA AUTO PARTS 8.62 AP 00336798 2013/05/291 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.86 AP 00336798 2013/05/29 l NAPA AUTO PARTS 4.32 AP 00336804 2013/05/29( OAKVIEW CONSTRUCTORS INC -2,303.34 AP 00336804 2013/05/29( OAKVIEW CONSTRUCTORS INC 46,066.79 AP 00336814 2013/05/29( PAZ, LORENA 6.00 AP 00336820 2013/05/291 PREMIER PARTY&TENT RENTALS 1,062.67 AP 00336828 2013/05/29( ROBLES, RAUL P 75.00 AP 00336828 2013/05/29( ROBLES, RAUL P 30.00 AP 00336828 2013/05/29( ROBLES, RAUL P 110.00 AP 00336830 2013/05/291 ROSS CREATIONS 550.00 AP 00336841 2013/05/291 SCOTT, MICHAEL 344.74 AP 00336845 2013/05/291 SHEAKLEY 46.25 AP 00336845 2013/05/29( SHEAKLEY 189.20 AP 00336845 2013/05/29( SHEAKLEY 12.00 AP 00336848 2013/05/29( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 227.95 AP 00336848 2013/05/291 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 40.17 AP 00336848 2013/05/291 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,782.59 AP 00336848 2013/05/29( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 14.30 AP 00336848 2013/05/29( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 66.96 AP 00336848 2013/05/29( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 0.17 AP 00336848 2013/05/29( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 8.26 AP 00336858 2013/05/29( SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 376.05 AP 00336871 2013/05/29( TRACEY,VAL 120.00 AP 00336871 2013/05/29( TRACEY,VAL 228.00 AP 00336871 2013/05/291 TRACEY,VAL 252.00 AP 00336871 2013/05/291 TRACEY, VAL 432.00 AP 00336873 2013/05/29( UNGASHICK,JULIE 42.41 AP 00336875 2013/05/29( UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORPORATION 260.19 AP 00336877 2013/05/29( UNIVERSAL MARTIAL ARTS CENTERS 1,669.78 AP 00336881 2013/05/29( VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 412.89 AP 00336881 2013/05/291 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1,699.15 AP 00336881 2013/05/291 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 3,220.37 AP 00336886 2013/05/29( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,719.06 AP 00336886 2013/05/29( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 129.90 AP 00336886 2013/05/29( WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 43.51 AP 00336891 2013/05/29 1 ZERE, EDEN 275.00 AP 00336919 2013/06/05 1 ACCELA INC 2,638.46 AP 00336919 2013/06/05 ( ACCELA INC 1,960.00 AP 00336922 2013/06/05( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 588.23 AP 00336922 2013/06/05 ( AGAPE EMPLOYMENT 110.83 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 25 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P38 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336924 2013/06/05 ( ALL WELDING 420.00 AP 00336932 2013/06/05 ( BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE -17.67 AP 00336932 2013/06/05 ( BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE 572.00 AP 00336934 2013/06/05 I BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN 600.00 AP 00336940 2013/06/05 I CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 278.33.. AP 00336945 2013/06/05 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 41,693.28 AP 00336945 2013/06/05 I CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 45.49 AP 00336947 2013/06/05 ( D AND K CONCRETE COMPANY 496.80 AP 00336950 2013/06/05 ( DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 115.00 AP 00336955 2013/06/05 ( FINNELL,JAIMEE 100.00 AP 00336965 2013/06/05 ( GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 54.00 AP 00336965 2013/06/05 ( GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,250.00 AP 00336968 2013/06/05 1 GRAVES& KING LLP 875.00 AP 00336975 2013/06/05 I HOUSE OF RUTH 407.51 AP 00336978 2013/06/051 IA A P 25.00 AP 00336978 2013/06/051 IA A P 25.00 AP 00336978 2013/06/05 ( IA A P 25.00 AP 00336978 2013/06/05 ( IA A P 25.00 AP 00336987 2013/06/05 ( LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 252.00 AP 00336987 2013/06/05( LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 367.50 AP 00336987 2013/06/05 ( LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 6,656.34 AP 00336987 2013/06/05 I LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 13,918.22 AP 00336987 2013/06/051 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 849.00 AP 00336994 2013/06/05 ( MARTINEZ UNION SERVICE 45.00 AP 00337001 2013/06/05 ( NEW COLOR SCREEN PRINTING&EMBROIDER) 455.00 AP 00337008 2013/06/05 ( PATTON SALES CORP 218.40 AP 00337011 2013/06/05 ( PINCOTT,JOHN 100.00 AP 00337021 2013/06/05 1 RJM DESIGN GROUP INC 898.60 AP 00337028 2013/06/05 ( SAN BERNARDINO CTY REAL ESTATE SVCS DEl 8,640.00 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 I SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,229.20 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 705.97 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 469.32 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 338.91 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 1 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 136.42 AP 00337033 2013/06/05 ( SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 111.42 AP 00337038 2013/06/05 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,911.45 AP 00337041 2013/06/05 I SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 80.00 AP 00337052 2013/06/05 1 TRACKDOWN MANAGEMENT SERVICES 100.00 AP 00337059 2013/06/05 ( UTILIQUEST 1,163.40 AP 00337059 2013/06/05 ( UTILIQUEST 538.07 AP 00337059 2013/06/051 UTILIQUEST 708.43 AP 00337060 2013/06/05 1 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 5,438.64 AP 00337060 2013/06/05 ( VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 15,984.00 AP 00337060 2013/06/05 ( VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 11,394.00 AP 00337060 2013/06/05 1 VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 2,878.30 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 26 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CKAGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P39 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00337060 2013/06/05( VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE 3,270.91 AP 00337066 2013/06/051 VILLENAS, FABIAN 150.29 AP 00337072 2013/06/051 WEST COAST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 1,539.83 AP 00337074 2013/06/051 WEST SANITATION SERVICES INC 361.95 AP 00337078 2013/06/051 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 67.04 AP 00337081 2013/06/061 AIRGAS USA LLC 148.88 AP 00337081 2013/06/061 AIRGAS USA LLC 53.35 AP 00337082 2013/06/061 AUTO BODY 2000 1,993.24 AP 00337083 2013/06/061 CALSENSE 98.81 AP 00337083 2013/06/061 CALSENSE 768.18 AP 00337083 2013/06/061 CALSENSE 16.56 AP 00337083 2013/06/061 CALSENSE 5,250.00 AP 00337083 2013/06/061 CALSENSE 3,000.00 AP 00337083 2013/06/061 CALSENSE 417.33 AP 00337090 2013/06/061 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 352.50 AP 00337090 2013/06/061 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 352.50 AP 00337106 2013/06/06( HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.58 AP 00337106 2013/06/061 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 830.45 AP 00337106 2013/06/061 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.00 AP 00337106 2013/06/061 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 61.62 AP 00337106 2013/06/061 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 968.90 AP 00337106 2013/06/061 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 125.00 AP 00337107 2013/06/061 HYDRO SCAPE PRODUCTS INC 223.82 AP 00337108 2013/06/061 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 243.50 AP 00337109 2013/06/061 LIMS AUTO INC 303.93 AP 00337109 2013/06/061 LIMS AUTO INC 44.53 AP 00337109 2013/06/061 LIMS AUTO INC 149.21 AP 00337109 2013/06/061 LIMS AUTO INC 18.98 AP 00337109 2013/06/061 LIMS AUTO INC 18.98 AP 00337109 2013/06/06( LIMS AUTO INC 18.98 AP 00337113 2013/06/06( SUNRISE FORD 170.00 AP 00337115 2013/06/061 TOMARK SPORTS INC 2,787.50 AP 00337116 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 44.26 AP 00337116 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 613.78 AP 00337116 2013/06/061 UNIFIRST UNIFORM SERVICE 100.26 AP 00336658 2013/05/291 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 AP 00336658 2013/05/291 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 AP 00336658 2013/05/291 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 128.00 AP 00336658 2013/05/291 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 AP 00336658 2013/05/291 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 128.00 AP 00336658 2013/05/29( ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 128.00 AP 00336658 2013/05/291 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 AP 00336658 2013/05/291 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 96.50 AP 00336659 2013/05/291 AIRGAS SAFETY 92.31 AP 00336659 2013/05/291 AIRGAS SAFETY 61.79 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 27 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P40 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336659 2013/05/29( AIRGAS SAFETY 220.42 AP 00336661 2013/05/29( ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 20,104.11 AP 00336662 2013/05/29( ALPHAGRAPHICS 45.36 AP 00336662 2013/05/29( ALPHAGRAPHICS 22.68 AP 00336662 2013/05/29( ALPHAGRAPHICS 23.33 AP 00336663 2013/05/29( ALTA LOMA HIGH SCHOOL BAND BOOSTERS 450.00 AP 00336664 2013/05/29( APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 12,782.03 AP 00336664 2013/05/291 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 20,540.39 AP 00336672 2013/05/291 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 945.50 AP 00336673 2013/05/29( BOOMER EVENTS INC. 404.00 AP 00336674 2013/05/291 BRENT BINNALL ENTERPRISES 799.20 AP 00336685 2013/05/291 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 22.31 AP 00336685 2013/05/291 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 59.18 AP 00336685 2013/05/291 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 275.99 AP 00336685 2013/05/291 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 392.62 AP 00336685 2013/05/29( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 8.14 AP 00336685 2013/05/29( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 36.72 AP 00336685 2013/05/29( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 95.62 AP 00336685 2013/05/29( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS -38.17 AP 00336685 2013/05/29( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 109.12 AP 00336686 2013/05/291 CARTY, DIANE 936.00 AP 00336688 2013/05/291 CASTILLO, FRANCISCO 364.50 AP 00336691 2013/05/291 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 21.60 AP 00336694 2013/05/291 CIRIACKS, VALERIE ANN 30.00 AP 00336694 2013/05/291 CIRIACKS, VALERIE ANN 150.00 AP 00336714 2013/05/291 DOWNEY,JENNIFER 10.72 AP 00336715 2013/05/29 DUNN,ANN MARIE 90.00 AP 00336715 2013/05/29 I DUNN,ANN MARIE 601.40 AP 00336715 2013/05/29( DUNN, ANN MARIE 273.00 AP 00336715 2013/05/29( DUNN,ANN MARIE 60.00 AP 00336715 2013/05/29( DUNN,ANN MARIE 108.00 AP 00336715 2013/05/29( DUNN,ANN MARIE 171.00 AP 00336715 2013/05/29( DUNN,ANN MARIE 54.00 AP 00336716 2013/05/291 EARLEY, IDA 30.00 AP 00336716 2013/05/291 EARLEY, IDA 54.00 AP 00336717 2013/05/291 EASTERLING, RAY 24.00 AP 00336717 2013/05/29 EASTERLING, RAY 96.00 AP 00336717 2013/05/291 EASTERLING, RAY 144.00 AP 00336717 2013/05/29( EASTERLING, RAY 28.80 AP 00336724 2013/05/29( FITNESS FUN BOOTCAMP 189.60 AP 00336725 2013/05/29( FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 1,750.00 AP 00336727 2013/05/29( FREQUENT FLYER XTREME GYMNASTICS 540.40 AP 00336732 2013/05/29( GRAFFITI TRACKER INC 2,250.00 AP 00336733 2013/05/291 GRAINGER 540.66 AP 00336733 2013/05/291 GRAINGER 416.02 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 28 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P41 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336733 2013/05/291 GRAINGER 54.43 AP 00336733 2013/05/29( GRAINGER 1,315.70 AP 00336733 2013/05/29( GRAINGER 4,085.84 AP 00336733 2013/05/29( GRAINGER 5.75 AP 00336733 2013/05/29( GRAINGER 56.69 AP 00336733 2013/05/29( GRAINGER 30.43 AP 00336733 2013/05/29( GRAINGER 278.21 AP 00336733 2013/05/291 GRAINGER 48.76 AP 00336733 2013/05/291 GRAINGER 54.66 AP 00336745 2013/05/29( HAY, SHARON 75.60 AP 00336745 2013/05/29( HAY, SHARON 48.00 AP 00336746 2013/05/291 HDS WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 323.49 AP 00336746 2013/05/29( HDS WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 442.98 AP 00336757 2013/05/29( INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 242.93 AP 00336758 2013/05/29( INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 2,040.00 AP 00336763 2013/05/29( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 511.54 AP 00336763 2013/05/29( JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 19.02 AP 00336764 2013/05/29( JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 3,166.80 AP 00336765 2013/05/29( JONES AND MAYER, LAW OFFICES OF 1,377.50 AP 00336766 2013/05/291 JUMP START RECREATIONS 1,627.20 AP 00336782 2013/05/29( MAIN STREET SIGNS 2,911.52 AP 00336782 2013/05/29( MAIN STREET SIGNS 690.12 AP 00336782 2013/05/29( MAIN STREET SIGNS 20,068.45 AP 00336783 2013/05/29( MANSFIELD GAS EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 334.77 AP 00336783 2013/05/29( MANSFIELD GAS EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 4,363.39 AP 00336783 2013/05/29( MANSFIELD GAS EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS 902.43 AP 00336784 2013/05/29( MARCO EQUIPMENT CO 349.92 AP 00336785 2013/05/29( MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 208.69 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 275.84 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 50.52 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 146.17 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 7.54 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 50.31 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 68.01 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 26.80 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 138.84 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 3.66 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 18.17 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 38.96 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 46.74 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 15.17 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 62.68 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 85.20 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 9.55 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT -47.31 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 29 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P42 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amount AP 00336806 2013/05/29 I OFFICE DEPOT 33.96 AP 00336806 2013/05/29 I OFFICE DEPOT 233.96 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 64.78 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 129.59 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 15.15 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 3.55 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 208.16 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 184.25 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 1,318.58 AP 00336806 2013/05/29( OFFICE DEPOT 77.06 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 50.64 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 73.98 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 57.47 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 65.31 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT -7.95 AP 00336806 2013/05/291 OFFICE DEPOT 75.59 AP 00336807 2013/05/291 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 756.00 AP 00336808 2013/05/29( ORONA,PATRICIA 1,200.00 AP 00336808 2013/05/29( ORONA,PATRICIA 75.00 AP 00336809 2013/05/29( OTT,LAURA 252.00 AP 00336809 2013/05/29( OTT,LAURA 480.00 AP 00336811 2013/05/29( PACIFIC YOUTH CHEER 598.50 AP 00336812 2013/05/291 PAL CAMPAIGN 10.00 AP 00336832 2013/05/29( SAENZ, RICHARD 90.00 AP 00336838 2013/05/291 SAN BERNARDINO CTY DEPT OF PUBLIC WORK 1,977.00 AP 00336839 2013/05/291 SBPEA 843.90 AP 00336859 2013/05/291 SOZA, MANUELA 500.00 AP 00336861 2013/05/29( STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 545.51 AP 00336862 2013/05/29( STUDIO ELITE 387.45 AP 00336866 2013/05/29( THEATRICAL LIGHTING& SCENIC SERVICES LL 171.33 AP 00336866 2013/05/29( THEATRICAL LIGHTING& SCENIC SERVICES LL 171.33 AP 00336867 2013/05/29( THOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS 3,104.71 AP 00336868 2013/05/29( THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 1,577.05 AP 00336868 2013/05/29( THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 1,474.80 AP 00336869 2013/05/291 TOLMAN,BRANDY 21.00 AP 00336879 2013/05/29( UPS 81.14 AP 00336888 2013/05/29 I WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 200.00 AP 00336888 2013/05/29( WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 200.00 AP 00336888 2013/05/29( WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 200.00 AP 00336892 2013/05/29( ZIRGES,ARLENE 210.00 AP 00336893 2013/05/29( SANTA ANA WATERSHED ASSOCIATION 19,000.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 ( ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 ( ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 I ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 I ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 30 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDAREG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P43 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336920 2013/06/05 ( ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 ( ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05( ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 l ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05( ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 I ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/051 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 I ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 I ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 25.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 I ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 I ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336920 2013/06/05 1 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00336921 2013/06/05 ( AERVOE INDUSTRIES INC. 720.00 AP 00336936 2013/06/05 ( CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 480.34 AP 00336937 2013/06/05 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 289.21 AP 00336937 2013/06/05 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 59.86 AP 00336937 2013/06/05 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 15.94 AP 00336937 2013/06/05 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 31.88 AP 00336937 2013/06/05 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS -213.22 AP 00336937 2013/06/05 ( CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 132.19 AP 00336937 2013/06/05 l CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 53.61 AP 00336937 2013/06/051 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 16.15 AP 00336937 2013/06/051 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 215.98 AP 00336938 2013/06/05 I CASE POWER AND EQUIPMENT 646.50 AP 00336939 2013/06/051 CDW-G 1,382.51 AP 00336949 2013/06/05 1 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 115.00 AP 00336952 2013/06/051 EXERCISE EQUIPMENT SERVICE CO. 2,208.73 AP 00336952 2013/06/05 1 EXERCISE EQUIPMENT SERVICE CO. 190.00 AP 00336952 2013/06/05 l EXERCISE EQUIPMENT SERVICE CO. 450.75 AP 00336953 2013/06/05 ( FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.09 AP 00336953 2013/06/05 l FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.27 AP 00336963 2013/06/05 l GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 400.00 AP 00336964 2013/06/05 1 GILMAN,JIM 400.00 AP 00336969 2013/06/05( GUTIEREZ,JOSE 100.00 AP 00336971 2013/06/051 HAIGHT BROWN&BONESTEEL LLP 375.83 AP 00336972 2013/06/05( HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 197.00 AP 00336980 2013/06/05 I INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 30,881.32 AP 00336980 2013/06/05 I INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR INC 898.85 AP 00336981 2013/06/05 1 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 47,451.61 AP 00336992 2013/06/051 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 304.52 AP 00336992 2013/06/05 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 141.57 AP 00336992 2013/06/05 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,431.46 AP 00336992 2013/06/05 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,493.10 AP 00336992 2013/06/05( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 5,511.22 User: VLOPEZ-VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 31 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P44 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00336992 2013/06/05 ( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 10,068.56 AP 00336992 2013/06/05( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 9,268.38 Ap 00336992 2013/06/05( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 1,890.97 AP 00336992 2013/06/05( MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 2,500.00 AP 00336992 2013/06/051 MARIPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT INC 21,635.55 AP 00336997 2013/06/05 I MILANES, YIKCIA 500.00 AP 00336997 2013/06/05 I MILANES,YIKCIA 525.00 AP 00336997 2013/06/05 I MILANES, YIKCIA 100.00 AP 00336999 2013/06/05 I NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RENTALS INC 423.69 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 26.95 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 318.20 AP 00337003 2013/06/05( OFFICE DEPOT 22.99 AP 00337003 2013/06/05( OFFICE DEPOT 478.25 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 2,118.74 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 22.67 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 1 OFFICE DEPOT 756.63 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 I OFFICE DEPOT 933.10 AP 00337003 2013/06/051 OFFICE DEPOT 556.19 AP 00337003 2013/06/051 OFFICE DEPOT 273.07 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 315.55 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 64.78 AP 00337003 2013/06/05( OFFICE DEPOT 51.03 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 17.01 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 I OFFICE DEPOT 9.58 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 I OFFICE DEPOT 20.28 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 I OFFICE DEPOT 35.35 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 170.15 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 53.98 AP 00337003 2013/06/05( OFFICE DEPOT 69.10 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 96.12 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 1 OFFICE DEPOT 124.55 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 1 OFFICE DEPOT 5.38 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 I OFFICE DEPOT 137.94 AP 00337003 2013/06/051 OFFICE DEPOT 9.46 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 150.16 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 80.97 AP 00337003 2013/06/05( OFFICE DEPOT 131.94 AP 00337003 2013/06/05 ( OFFICE DEPOT 43.18 AP 00337004 2013/06/05 1 ONTARIO VETERINARY HOSPITAL 50.00 AP 00337005 2013/06/05 I ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 588.92 AP 00337006 2013/06/051 OPARC 396.00 AP 00337023 2013/06/05 ( RODRIGUEZ,CARLOS OR ROSA MARIA 2,400.00 AP 00337024 2013/06/05 ( S.CALIF. MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDERATION 420.00 AP 00337025 2013/06/051 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 8,648.45 AP 00337031 2013/06/051 SIGMANET 7,200.00 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 32 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC- CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P45 Agenda Check Register 5/29/2013 through 6/11/2013 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Amouni AP 00337031 2013/06/05 ( SIGMANET 6,840.00 AP 00337031 2013/06/05( SIGMANET 3,040.00 AP 00337031 2013/06/051 SIGMANET 7,200.00 AP 00337031 2013/06/051 SIGMANET 5,700.00 AP 00337031 2013/06/051 SIGMANET 6,697.50 AP 00337031 2013/06/051 SIGMANET 2,200.00 AP 00337031 2013/06/051 SIGMANET 200.00 AP 00337043 2013/06/05 l STERICYCLE INC 1,430.06 AP 00337044 2013/06/051 STOVER SEED COMPANY 1,409.41 AP 00337045 2013/06/05 ( SULLIVAN, DENNIS 100.00 AP 00337050 2013/06/05 ( THOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS 103.59 AP 00337055 2013/06/05 ( U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,822.50 AP 00337056 2013/06/051 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 3,900.00 AP 00337057 2013/06/05 ( UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 12,226.00 AP 00337057 2013/06/05 l UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 7,780.00 AP 00337057 2013/06/05 ( UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 15,625.00 AP 00337062 2013/06/05 ( VEND U COMPANY 362.16 AP 00337076 2013/06/05 ( WESTERN RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION: 1,500.00 EP 00003399 2013/05/291 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMOI 7,075.00 EP 00003399 2013/05/291 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMOI 1,480.00 EP 00003401 2013/05/29( RCPFA 9,534.06 EP 00003403 2013/06/05 l RIVERSIDE,CITY OF 6,052.00 EP 00003404 2013/06/05 l SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 15,045.00 EP 00003404 2013/06/05 ( SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,360,600.00 EP 00003400 2013/05/291 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 474.00 Total for Entity: 4,831,232.30 User: VLOPEZ- VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 33 Current Date: 06/12/: Report:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_RC-CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 15:4 P46 03 00� 2 > e w n w 00 °O m > a c -J N 7 0 CO N CO y F Q N r? 0 0 O o .- o 0 o o c U ^ N.. Ill E 10 $ 0 O § > a U d y 0 E ¢ Oa a 0 u a m ry 2 n m M H 0 a 0 a a E -o c f > m W +- c o o .- o CO 0 CO N N m.0 Q O y L T n U c0 O U o• E av L A n .f CO m E y 0 W A y N y O2 > O c c.0 O .-E. N > XL O E - N 0) Q CO 0 0 a i v >.a t y n r r H r r U N Q'N U_ 0 ri y a e o L O.° m o N 0 lg_ N N 0 p O O E E O K in o y > m k C Y o N O 0 CO C 0 CO N )O N c o . N O . N. n O i y O Vi Q y co LL 0 U m> N I N- N N P CO 0 CO M 0 O ,Y Q W N. N O O a N T1.37 CA co 0 0 �' N 0 0 y A N- co O 0 C N Q 0) N. a a E en O Q m ' T l6 O y U ED cut.G oa.a _ a c r c C0' O 0 a V O C 7 N O r o r E o co 0 CO N .. O M C y C > V C1 m m to r co = m C O •O CO `� N N Q O r r N N- N 0 U 'O C W — r L rec •� C �> N n M p m CO N CO 0 .L_ a 0 N 0 " 3 U OQ N CO 0 v0i m O n N N LL T 7 L D a p Q m n N E y O Z. CI N co °a E U .e u Be a E a 0 c L !" 3 47 a Z 0 L y y y C y y O O O e 0 O) in . j N N 01 O) O O Q) N U 0 0-N M O O D Q C M O co E L O > N O 00 O m a a u N o m E a — N 10 W 0 - > 0 c W N O N O) A N- O L Q m C O 0 y a a .r of h CO G r L 0 a a L r r rM _ aE° E y >,.....A C U > 0 0 y c 0 N M in 0> 0 U L U > • O 0 f m , .\ N N a C 1� m C C c r )y T0- 00 )O ^= rU y y - 9 C Vim❑ mt M y 2 N C o c.c. U_ O C E n d N U E c O❑ c O O :173 N Ls.> > O _ 2 o _ 'c `g V = = d d C y O o a ° E N N o " y > m a - 0 EE m ° m --- h o m ma 10 m v c Ern Ar c •e� i S 0 c a u C $ d am c m V > 0 v 0 6 C To 0 � ��_ .�' O i m T' m „, 0 m a Li°w ea- : iti � '� `w u-i r m o N .m. U W o- 3 y L v c o C_S N ID O.> 0 8i _ > m m0 u a 0 0 = > t 0a m o 0 O LL 2 � U a S< to H r U Q W _ < > H rn � K P47 • >y m (7 m m CO CO CO n Cl. CJ m Q 0 m m n n n CO CO CO Q m CO 0 O n CO 0 a h 0 'YC N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O Q 0 z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N r CA to co m_ N 0 ! co C) e O O Q co O n 0 co 0 ` 0 0 0 N O O 0 Q 0 O 0 n 0 N a ` ON N .- .- r N N N N N N O 0 N 0) C) N N COO N N 0) 0 0 2 > e 0 '— 0) r (� Q Q O co n Q P O CO 00 ,- 1- 1/1 ,- m CO 0 O 00 > 00 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 x 00 0 00 00 0 O. r 22' 00 NQ Q O m O Q0 C) n0 m 0 N Q 50 N000000r m N C ' ' n r O NO '- n N Q '- 0 m O 0 C O N- L O 0 01 r Q N V CO Q O 00 0 d CC 0 0 at 0 r N ^ 0 Q 0 0 •-^ ' f f N N CO_ O ^ 0 ` CO f m_ m d R f 5 0 0 CJ 0) Cl m 0 0 0 r ION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O n 0 0 0 0 0 N N O Q O m CO 0 00 0 N N N N O 0 0 0 C.- 010 0 10 O Q n 0 0 0 0 CO r N N 0 n 0 0 r 0 CO 0 0. 99 Y) 0 0 7 7 0 00. 0 N N 0 0 0797 O O O C '— '— Ci Ci r r C N '— '— '— N ' O r '- 6 r r r 0 e e r O r r r co co co co N co co co co CO CO CO CO CO co co CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 8 E O O coo 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) 0 0 0 0 0 c o o O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 o2 Q m ON O O m 0 0 0 Nino O O O O m O O O tor-- co 0 0 N LIDO N W N 9N-. 0 0 0 0 0 0 9N. 9 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 N (NO 907 O 9 R' O O r r O O r r O N .- r r N r 0 r r 0 r r r 0 .- .- r O r r i- v/ 0 N 1y O O r r O 0 i0O m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0C-41-- 0 0 0 0 O r O 9 N N O O Q n 00 n m r 0 0 0 0 N. 00 O N V 000001- O C) C) Cf 6 O 0 n 0 O n m 6 m 0 m O O O O m O O O f N O O O O O O n O • 0 m O O 0 r O O 0 O ` N 01 .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ac 0 N N n n 0 0 0 O 0 n CO 01 r 0000N- 0000000000 n m M 0 Q Q O m 0 0 O O O N Vi of N O O O O 0 O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 C) n O 0 m m 0 W 0 0001000 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O) 01 m N N 01 0 0 0 O O Q 0 m 0 Q 0, 0 0 0 0 000 O 0 0 0 O O O O 01 0 Y N YI p V O p l7 Q Q .- N .- N N Q Q N 10 r N C] CO Q O Q CO- O N N C) Q Q O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .5000 S N N 10 O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 01.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1) To 6 N 0 0 O m tri N N 6 O N O 01 O N Q N N O n N N O O 6 0 e O O O r > 0 0 0 m O 0 0 0 0 M O N O 00 N O C) n 0 0 O CO O ONO 0 0 ` CI n N N 0 CO N O CO r CO 0 x 0 CO n r Q O Q N CO CO N 0 Q 0) CO C) 0 N O Ti' N N O h a Q! Ol ni n Q r O e O N O N 0 0 Q O co- n co- n O) 0 th Q n ;L 0 CO 0) 0 O0 O O W n Q Q '- 00 CO O C) r N 0 01 O N 0 0 0 N N r O CO n n q N N CO 0 0 0 0 Q 01 m O O r O O m CO Q m Q O O 0 O O m CO Q CO N ifi Q N Q O N N N 0 0 Q Q N N ■- N N Q Q N Q '- N m C Q O Q C) O N N C CO C C C N O F m E N as �1) y 0 m 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (, W ' M 5 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 C r q C) C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 > m m N N 0 0 0000000000000000000000000000 000 000 00000 0 0 00 000000 000 000 O C ) N N m pO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 O CO y N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ✓ L _ M— m Q Q O It N N O Q C O O N N r N N Q P 0 O ' N Q co- Q O Q 0 O C N C C C y R et 0 O ) r y y co' O r N Ct Cl 0 COO O N N N N N /Omen r N N N N C) C) O O O q W O O O co co O O O O O O O O co O O O O 0 O O O O O co O O O O /� u❑ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N /+LL O VI CO '- 015 '- 0151500 n O 0 001) 0) 000 n O 0 0 0 0 010 �\/ O CO C N N r N N O N N N N O 0 ,- N C) N 0 C) 0 N N C) NN (! a a o 0000000000 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 . 0 00 0 '- '- 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O) 0) 0 0 N N 0_ O. d R d 0_ 0 0_ q C) N K K K K K K K K Q m CO CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `$N n Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 U' 0' 0 0 0 0 U' ❑ (p < Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y /- I- H /- 1- 1- I- /- Z p F « < < < < < Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Wine K K K K K ❑ E. m m 0 0 0 m m Q < < g Q Q Q < < Q < a < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL < H I— r r r H r m m m m m m m ma m m m M M s 2 2 2 2 2 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ z z z z z z Z z z Z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z Z 0 W w W W W W W ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ < ¢ ¢ < ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ a ¢ Q z rem K K K K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 F0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J J J J . . . . . . J J J J J J J J J > U 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 w W w W W W W W W W w w W w W W w W W w W O 0 w 0 K K KKK K K 22222222222222222222 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0 E z m E < < < < < < < 0000000000 O O O O O O N• 0 0 W 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL ¢ a W a W W W w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w W W W W W W O C Z C ❑ ❑ O O O o o ❑ o o ❑ o ❑ o o ❑ o ❑ o ❑ o ❑ ❑ o ❑ o ❑ ❑ o ' W co W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W U .5 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 0 0 a a S S O it a N co O 0• C C j a. LL O 0 to 0 H 0 O U O N Q N O n 0 N 0 0 0 O C) r N 0 O 0) O Q M Q n N O NCI CO 0 CO NN N N N N O O 0 O N N h N 0300 0 0 r C) C) C E 0 Q N 0 Q Q 0 0 0 O O Q Q Q Q t O O 0 O Q Q Q 0 0 0 O O a 0 N 0 0 (0 0 ui 7 0. C 1y >1 T R 0 1') C 5 C R 0 co n m 0 0 o Q J Y O N Q a .4 Q ❑ d K O 7 m m Z O m m > U r 1- "- 000= f-, Q 0 E _ ` Q ¢¢ > U LL J 2 Q 2 J LL LL > N _) Z Q CO K M 0 CO 0 0. t~+) > O V N. 1 r y < 00 U U > > N C) N 0 00 'm m N n ¢ m q o E N 0 r ug W W W W X X N N n n n n n co mmm W U' U' 0 7 0 co E m 0 n n (Nn 0n 1i 1i n n 0 C0) C0) m 0 N Cm) m m m M (n N 0' ' (Qn 0 0 U J to Cm) LL (n m O (n m N m 1n N N N N N co M Cr N m N C> (n r') m (n m to (n an K P48 N V'' 000 S O S 000 Q CO Ln y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Q N CO «Q N N N N N N N N N N N A CO 2 N N 0 Q N O CO CO N r N UO r4 2 0000000? 0 0 0 O EI u. 0� NNO pAA yQN m Am A 0 K d = N N O N Wan ,. O , m CO r CO A O d O d r r r ' Or N r N- 0r r N 0 a d et 22 0000400 O 0 N- CO .- O CO CO LO CO Yr O O p 0 0 0 LO 0 O O O r N <CO CO m CO CO N N .- .- 6 - .- ,- •- r N O O O d CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO a CO Q< as CO ad ¢ � 2 8 E 0 0 0 N'0 0 0 0 O O 0 9 d 0 0 0 A O 0 O A 0 0 d q O O Q - 0 0 O r o 0 O 9Q' N N r - O r r 0 N N a) d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 CO 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N in A O6 N 0 p • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m A Q O OI y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m 0 CO m A Y V O O O O O O ci O N OI 0 A Q Q 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CO N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 m N 0 O m A N N N O N Q C] Q Al A 0 Cl m d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 q N N 0 O N Q N Ct O ' 0 O 0 m • 0 0 0 A O N- CO 1l N N- Q r CO (0 C) 0 0 0 N- M V O 0 m N N N N N m CO- N N CO r 0 O 0 m N O O - N A 0 A N 0 ■ O V 0 q 0 0 0 O O m m m m N O Q m A to M 2 N N N 0 0 0 N N Q ' N A 0 CO C O C E O N al N ; M 'd. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 00 00 °O 00 C R� r q O O O O O O O O O O O O O CO 3 v, C > O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (Q 000000000 O O O O N V C 1 N `0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ri o 0 o ai O y a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n m A ✓ M N N N V] 0 Q 0 CO- N ' N r„- m N C O m �a w o p2 C d d r r r N N N 0 0 CO O O O O q N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 /� u 0 N N N N N N N N N N N CI LO 0 0 CO\L N N CO Q N O Cl Cl N CO N V d 0 0 ? o 0 0 0 0 0 0 WU m 3 S r - r j N o V V Co ai E co n N W m m ai 0 0 ai A Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z r a Z m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W U Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q CO < I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Q 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 U W - - - Ir - - Ir I- A m U W Cl m O• Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z d ZZ Q u m a K K K K K K K K K < w N a < W W W W W W W W W V Z LL p 0 0 V 0 q J A IL IL L W W LLl W W LL LL LL U, .' CC V O O F n a u O m co d a dF 3 N U N CO Cl m N 0 Q m r CO A d 1 A A O m m O r N 0 N 0 N r 0 V f 7 to O N 0 o V C co C C O o co C 0 0 Q m M ti NN N 0 m Q N Ce Ce D J J Q Y > a m n u m m V1 D N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 C m 0 r, D 0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 0') 7 Cl O O IS m m m N N N N CO m rL e " c rc P49 I- 0 m U a. 0 E 0 y■>« �^ o a 02 d a 2 o to N 0 O O N o. a 0 0 2 °• o r q N ale ° N o 1 b a n cq N 0) m N m o -IC 0 O p co o co o N O CO ^ n N to er) T _J 1. N n a A• co N co N e a m m 6 Lei Y N N C) N It— r N is 2 m al C r O C t N E E. U M ? n n co 0 d ) r r co c r U is y 0 > <cn C � N O CO r - a N o to ui co G f1 cn C o o , ra A./ a O W • j`. t o co o 3i a d u O c 3 3 2 ° •U o. am' 0)0 o 0 E c o N j N Q CO a, Q co Z 0 X 0 LL J Q 0 0 • x C Icri Y c c 0 ¢Z ry E w a o 0 Z d j O m c Z `y O > > c Q o = co it C 0 O O 3 E o r 0 Q m o N 5 0 °o 0 c ai m N 0 to u CO m o. c `°o cri D co > 0 ca 0 c 0 H < 6. 0, r- p- 0 a ° f > o LL' o 0 cc 0 a co 0- O CI-N O ' O N .as co •ce V C w m °O m N To ry h m a< m co m o < 0 N m a. m 1. vi d c V ;71 m N N O O O O 00 N O 0 0 0 N N N C 0 O O O O O O N O O N0000 N M 1+1 VJ O ; O o O O O O a ° ° r O ^ Y oi N 0) t.r.! O O O I. m .m C N N W E2 o ° o 6 o R m di 10 o o o O en 0 p a•- o 0 m m o e of n m 0 m N N l7 m .- ,- . • O N 4 O 0 0 0 0 O o o O O O O 0 0 O d. 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O N w °° 0 0 o N ° ° v N ° °o °m ° ° °m M c g 0 0 n 1. m m m CO e r = w °0 of o m m °m m m a ai n CC Co N a o 0 o w m v 0 ,o- 01 of m m C W1 n 1. O 4 {7 l7 O ' N O L M E m 0 E d R 3 V C T as O CO m 7 L 2 at O CO CO w w or n N N rc.L d0 N N N N N N N N C O j .. 0 t M C UI N '- N N N M N co a `�Ly O (, N m N N N N N N 1y`0 Q V f 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O O 0 N to o 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 r .2 R N m O N m O ° N m N 6 6 O co 2 a a a a 0 0• cc 0 cc 0 cc 0 0 0 0 U U U U o F dOOd H H H Z H 2 0 CC i2 0 0 0 2 2 z D LL < m2 E E2 00 0 ce f 0 z Z z Z 2 < < LL 0 > 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z K Z' U U r > W W W W W CO LL CO z W 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ ~ E 0 E x x x x x z Y 3 o z o �o 0 E 0 2 $W z J J . . . . . d (n ¢¢ z y 1- `d o Q co W N - N t Z 0 0 U Z 0000000 O N L o W W W W W W W W C 2 O �� # C C a o 3 m c C 3 3 0 E IS 0 0 0 0 U 0 >• co O N coi ' n m 0 01i h o n m m C o w o O o N y d N tu C aa. W N N iii O. 0 c co >, 0 0 0 C m N ✓ N N a) O m m a CO N V ° a 2 W X j J O Q °o E '> N e 7 rl n 11+ m a To '� 0 x q m N Ol V V 0 0 CO V 0) 03 CO 0 00000 c a m o (°n E m .130 m N NNN m m > m c o D O > 0 m > U J 0 U M LL co el a a co N N CO w 2 c rt P51 w m x Q O p 0 O M N p co p O 0 O O Q) N O t' N 0 O N Q Q C >' m N. 0 0 n O O n 0 0) ' Q O OI O 6 ' O N ' O ' C) N 2 co N m 0 0 co, O co a Q Q cc O N N O O N Q t N N rl O N y = N N N N O N- (O 0 "( > E 0 co w W w - s w w s W w 69 M M M N al e e e o see se e o e e -2 o o e a e c 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 .- 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q To g .I ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ < 0 f Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z it N E N tf N 0 V) N y n n Ol a O E N IA N i0 N N N O O O o O O N R d O m at m O O O 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O) OI OI m 0 O C c C N N N m N m 040 V Q Q Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m N n 0) d 0 0 0 n n (C'f 0 N N N N -r?.., N O 9O O O O O Q N 0 cccc N lii O O O O .0 .o 0 LL rn 01 m m d' O 0 Z. 0 O O O O 5 j 0000 a V 0 0 0 0 9 c E a a a v m a s a a s a a a a a a a a a a W y •H C c C 0 0 CO 0 4) C C C C C c C C C C c C Q 0 LL LL LL Fq" H )' ■)' LL LL LL. LL LL LL LL LL Li- LL LL LL LL li LL li 2 U n p Y Y Y U O D U Y Y Y Y Y p Y Y s Y Y Y a Y Y Z 0 (0 0 V 0 0 0 N 0 N o N co N (0 CO 0 O] N it a 5 2 2 E E E E E 5 2 5 2 2 n F 5 2 5 2 5 5 5 LL w 5 - v 0 > ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 0 a) v w or m 0 0 0 m O a W O m m=C C O O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O.11 E ., n 5 5 5 LL LLLL LL E E 5 2 5 5 2 5 2 5 5 5 2 5 M 5 3 y E a N O N O n O 0 0 O N 0 0 O Q N 0 N 0�p O 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 C O O O o N N N N N m 0 co 0 m 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O n n 17 ! M !7 C] N N M (") l7 C) eN- N 0 N tn(1 N N N 0 CD V n n n O C C t 0 0 O) O1 0 0000 0 0 CO N OI O] 0 0 0) C) 0 N 0 N N N N LL 0 V (O t0 t0 IO (O m (O m m (O 0 (O 0 0 CO (O CO 0 0 0 0 0 m s a g a c p `o g i• 0 tv. a m U U E a E ac -o ac la t LL Z• a a C O C ac a C ac IL LL OO U LL {'o] u LL ac a ] p0 a)cc E o LL LL LL Z LL LL LL LL LL 2 0 t] ¢ N t] Q 0 LL c N U Q 0 E o c v ti t o m v m ti _ ¢ o r ¢ n r v ti ¢ r C v E 2 E v c o c — a m n 0 2 u o a To(0 < 2 o v v B v 4 '0 '0 0 '0 _ E '0 0 0 v ° ' 0 p a n > > 0 0 w C v v c 0 'p^ c 0 v v v v v o. a - n - a 0 o n E K K =• t� K K K K co CO c a (� d to K LL V d N p C O O 0 O 0 0 o c a rn o, m m rn m 9' 0y ¢ LL - — - ure. - _i- 0 y c N _ 0 N _ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 N i 0 F a m N V 0 V C co O ry C m a E a o0 LL O , E 3 m n Y N 3 p a y y 0) n p - L W m O W m E o r c Z c 0 c v 3 o co 'o m 0 m ll W LL N 0 > 0) N (') O 0 cc m 0 C) O O 3 0 I� in U' N at O N w m o 0 E -p Lc ¢ � m 0 0 0 0 w .y ¢ a K m Z Z Z Z H v ¢ m ¢ O O O 0 O LL Q a d U 0 U U 0 P52 N CO X — O O O (p W N O r 0 O O p CO CO O r r ') N N O 10 N r N N O .-- 0 0 CO O O O L T 0 0 r0 r 00 ' 0 ONNNO O CO CO rroa O OnL 00 0 0 O 0 N r r r N (0 N r N 0 cow r r N 0 CO 0 Q O( 01 m m 0 0 Cr N N co 5 p Q Q Q 0 N N 0) of (0 0 m CO CO Q d' ONO 0 N N 0 0 0 (0 a. tro O JI 10 10 •-• r 0 0 i P53 h m x 0 co 0) 0 VI W )- n 0 to N N 0 OI 0 0 0 O N m m C T CD y O 0 n m CO P 0 0 0 O N O n 0 0 0 Q O N 0 0 0 cNi O 0 CO n CO N N O a V) OI O N O r 0 0 0 n0 00 O O a rL v N 0 0 0 4:0 N .- o) n CO N n N N O a O N m CO N V m R ! 00)i 00)1 T CL S t0 01 n m N N O) CO m i 0 " N m E ' E 0 0) '0 «I W 69 w w S S E to DI o e o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o o e O o O o O o C a o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E 0 6 0 0 0 0)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Q Z . CO i y Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q a < Q Q 0 f . Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z LL N E u 0 to m m 0 n n N n n n n n n n N n n n N- o .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 .0 AI Q `V N Q N N N N N N N N `V N ` N j�V N N N O Q 1+I m en m CO in in 40 N N N I0 N N I0 N N N N VI tT n n n n n n C C C C C C C C C C C C C C Q U N LL W C Q u 0 c E a D a a a a D D a a a a c C a C C C a a a W 0 H coca = C C C C C C C C C C C 0) y o J J J J J 0 J J 7 7 7 7 7 7 a 0 Q ,. LL LL it LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL. LL LL LL LL LL LL C Z 0 0 0 0 0 To 1 s x 0 0 0 0 s x x s Y x s s Y E Q ry ry m m m m `m m `m `m `m m `m it it it it CO` `n O 0 ? .-LL o f 2 2 f 2 2 2 2 E 2 E 2 2 E 2 2 E 2 2 2 C LL co OIr a) N 0 W N W N 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 N 0 W 0 0 j o a r) cc C C C cc cc C C C C C C C C E o n E E 2 2 2 2 2 2 E 2 E 2 2 E 2 2 E 2 2 0 u y f a O C I'. Ih 0) u) N m N o N co o m O o n � 0 '5 en U a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- C N N N N N O V C C 0 N m 0 N m N 'O a) 0 n m m CO Cr) m m M C'1 CO. m m m CO 01 Q i W 0 m 0 m 0 m m m O m m m m r1 an en m m m en . E 0 N N N N N CO 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0) 000) 00 0 a C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O c e D C Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N E C 0 O .0 M N q E t « E D U O LL A DO C J C � U W. y Z C C J Q C C W C 7 LL a N mi LL J O D J LL U �E O LL j V Q LL ry LL 9 IJ C U V N C O O Q V O U if E N 0 LL Q N O N a N U u 0 u0 <8 ~ _ N R a N 5 u T o d ) E Q a) v o 5 c 'u 0 'u a; u a) ° 0 m N p o w C N U8" O) 6 6 5 0 E. N 0 OI NU 2 .E O a) X X a` = a` K Q Q co 5 a` N K Q Q U S o` �i m o c o 0 0 a m m rn % Q co I N i E _ 2 L C 0 L 0)0 d 3 z 3 w C c J O 4 Q 8 Nm LL y S I- E o o N O d H C to v o z E n 2 [2 2 2 m 0 h O N N m `0 a0 > co it z E C E 0 z O O Q 0 N 0 0 N N U t 0 0 U ~ Z Z Q Si"0 1- ' LL LL 0 Z o U F • P54 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUGAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Daniel Correa, Assistant Planner Subject: Consideration of Mills Act Application DRC2013-00384 for Route 66 IECA to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax for the Cucamonga Service Station, a designated Historic Landmark, in the Specialty Commercial District within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District located at 9670 Foothill Boulevard —APN: 0208-153-05. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission and staff recommend approval of Mills Act Agreement DRC2013-00384 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and authorize the Mayor to sign the Mills Act Agreement. BACKGROUND: The Cucamonga Service Station was designated by the City Council as a historical landmark on April 15, 2009. The service station remains in its original location, near the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue. The building faces Foothill Boulevard and is located to the west of Archibald Avenue. The current owner is now requesting to implement the use of the Mills Act for the Cucamonga Service Station property. ANALYSIS: The Historic Preservation Commission considered the draft Mills Act agreement on June 12, 2013, and a copy of that Staff Report is attached for reference as Exhibit A. The use of the Mills Act agreement will provide tax property savings every year. These tax savings will be used to renovate the existing landmark building and site; such as, replacing windows, painting, landscaping, repairing, and restoring any deterioration as needed. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the property site to properties to the north, south, east, and west. Respectfully ubmitted, Candyce Bu ett Planning Manager CB:DC/ge Attachments: Exhibit A — Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report, dated June 12, 2013 Exhibit B — Draft Resolution of Approval for Mills Act Application P55 j. STAFF REPORT s soh it PLANNING DEPARTMENT Lt-10-1 RANCHO Date: June 12, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Daniel Correa, Assistant Planner Subject: MILLS ACT APPLICATION DRC2013-00384 - ROUTE 66 IECA - A request •to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax for the Cucamonga Service Station, a designated Historic Landmark, in the Specialty Commercial District within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District, located at 9670 Foothill Boulevard — • APN 0208-153-05. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. BACKGROUND: The Cucamonga Service Station was designated by the City Council as a historical landmark on April 15, 2009. The service station remains in its original location, near the northwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Archibald Avenue. The building faces Foothill Boulevard and is located to the west of Archibald Avenue. The current owner is now requesting to implement the use of the Mills Act for the Cucamonga Service Station property. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is a rectangular-shaped parcel located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard and west of Archibald Avenue. It is approximately a 0.21-acre parcel. The land use designation of the site and its adjacent parcels to the west, east, and south are all zoned Specialty Commercial (SC). ANALYSIS: A. Historical Significance: The Cucamonga Service Station during its legendary years was known as the Richfield Gas Station. The service station was constructed in 1915 directly adjacent to the Historic Highway, U.S. Route 66 (Foothill Boulevard). For 56 years it continually provided drive-in services to local residents and travelers alike. Its doors were permanently closed in 1971. The station's first owner was William B. Harvey, followed by two other owners, Ancil Morris and Arvid Lewis. Arvid Lewis, along with two other early 1900s local civic leaders, Pete Klusman and Rudy Pimentel, formed the first Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department. Mr. Lewis served as Fire Chief from 1954 until his retirement in 1972; the service station closed one year prior to his retirement. B. Mills Act Agreement: In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act Agreement. The Agreement Schedule List of Improvements has been drafted and reviewed and is attached for reference (Exhibit E). The concept of the Mills Act program is to provide an incentive for the property owner to protect and preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical significance through proper maintenance and improvements. This intent is encouraged through the reduction of property taxes, thus enabling the property owner to reinvest the money saved from the reduced property tax on the improvements. The properties that enter into the aareement are to be inspected by City staff on an annual basis to determine whether notable EXHIBIT A P56 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MILLS ACT AGREEMENT DRC2013-00384 - ROUTE 66 IECA June 12, 2013 Page 2 progress has been made in rehabilitating the property. The property taxes for the Cucamonga Service Station will be calculated based on the estimated Mills Act Value. The exact amounts are dependent upon the County Assessor's property valuation, which is based on income potential and capitalization rate at the time of the assessment. C. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend approval of Mills Act Agreement DRC2013-00384 and to forward the application to the City Council for final action. Respectfully submitted, Candyce Burnett Planning Manager CB:DC/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Historic Resources Inventory, dated January 27, 2009 Exhibit C - Photographs (2013) Exhibit D - Resolution No. 09-072, dated April 15, 2009 Exhibit E - Agreement Schedule P57 lijAt V I'. illtri iiri , - 1 . 4,4„,„,,,,,. 11 • 4 i 1 . i . .. r_ M'' '- n .ti -- ` .Y• i nir, I. ....1,..._ # i •-- . • i+J s { F d Y j R i F on 1117. 1 'Icy. , ® ' ^• ti '+ i �• -in ' L.a1i u .. :..:... . . _ w At' 'it 9 I' '. l` i� "fit." -1•*' Er -4111 , a , . • 0010.4.: i- a sl fi 14.- ! '`.1 J 11 - -. ' . I, 1 pc" ,r4,,,N. I to' 1..' am OM . — L' i L �, ��•, '`�" _ Fes, r _ '� • CUCAMONGA SERVICE STATION 9670 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD A N EXHIBIT A /1.. ; „,, • P58 J.11,iL L j:L...II. - ,r..m,,... vz,v.:r:,7:-.Ktir .4,4■,',,/iz%m,/ . , /. i i 3/ ‘,/, , .....' 14.14'4.47'1'1:/. /4 . . 1 , C .! 4:?.?"4:e.:4"." /:// / 1 .- - • -MIMI. . • - - - - •C/zV-'///iii . r..i. .../ i 0 ------T - . , . . '/ / //:". '/ , , / All, . fg ....._, ,_ / ,..._•_i , . : . 'HL 1 . i ' , r L ij lir I1 .. Li hI _ [.. CUCAMONGA SERVICE STATION 9670 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD A N • State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial Page 1 of 4 Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) Cucamonga Service Station P1. Other Identifier: Ancil Morris Service Station, Old Richfield Gas Station *P2. Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5'Quad: Guasti Date: 1981 T 1S ; R 7W; S'/4 of SE 1/4 of Sec 1; San Bernardino B.M. c. Address: 9670 Foothill Boulevard City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 d. UTM: Zone: mE/ mN(G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: 1220' APN: 0208-153-05 LUCAS AND WARD SUB LOT 1 AND S 20 FT LOT 10 EX S 20 FT HGWY LOT 1 *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This station was built in 1915 as a refueling stop for travelers on the State Route(renamed US Route 66). It consists of two buildings: Building one is a rectangular building with mission styling. It has a flat roof with arched parapets and coping. There is a wide covered porch that covered the gas pumps with massive square supports. The corners have sheet metal tile treatment. Red tile accents the roof coping. The windows have wide molding and single panel glass. The door is twin panel with upper panel glass. The siding is stucco. Building two is a rectangular building with mission styling. It is of wood construction. It has a flat roof with arched parapets and coping. Red tile accents the roof coping. Multiple large door openings with barn doors of of diagonal wood paneling. The front of the structure is stucco. The sides appear to be sheet metal treatment. Alterations include the removal of the gas pumps and window trim. The site is surrounded by both commercial and residential uses and faces Foothill Boulevard(US Route 66). The structure is on its original site. At the time of this survey(2008), the condition of the building is fair. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP6 1-3 Story Commercial Building *P4. Resources Present: ©Building ❑Structure ❑Object ❑Site ODistrict ❑Element of District ❑Other(Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: Facing North from Foothill Boulevard 10/12/2008 1 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: IXlHistoric •I� ❑Prehistoric ❑Both 'a I i 1 11' Constructed in 1915 *P7. Owner and Address: TLC Properties, Inc. . 24541 Redlands Boulevard • , L ' ,, . Loma Linda, CA 92354 *P8. Recorded by: i , '.. 1 , ! Beth Hartley, Planning Aide ' •• I - ' - i 14 City of Rancho Cucamonga -.- - Planning Department .max 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 *P9. Date Recorded: 12/2008 *P10. Survey Type: (Describe) Reconaissance Survey *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter"none.") San Bernardino County Tax Assessor Records. *Attachments: ONONE OLocation Map IEiSketch Map ❑Continuation Sheet IEiBuilding, Structure, and Object Record ❑Archaeological Record ❑District Record ❑Linear Feature Record ❑Milling Station Record ❑Rock Art Record ❑Artifact Record ElPhotograph Record ❑ Other(List): EXHIBIT B pc 6// 2 /2 P60 State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # BUILDING,STRUCTURE AND OBJECT RECORD Trinomial - Page 2 of 4 Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) Cucamonga Service Station B1. Historic Name(s): Ancil Morris Service Station, Old Richfield Gas Station B2. Common Name: Cucamonga Service Station B3. Original Use: Service Station and Garage B4. Present Use: vacant *B5. Architectural Style: Mission Style Spanish Colonial *B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) The gas station was built in 1915 as a refueling and and automobile service stop on what was then called the"State Route." In 1925 this highway was designated US Route 66. In the 1925 that station became a Richfield Oil Distributor and the garage was added. Alterations include the removal of the gas pumps and window trim. *B7. Moved? No CI Yes OUnknown Date: Original Location: *B8. Related Features: Garage B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Henry Klusman. He and his brother were known around the community, especially for their various construction projects including the historic Virginia Dare winery. *B10.Significance: Roadside architecture on Historic US Route 66 Theme: Service Station Area: Foothill Boulevard (Historic US Route 66) in Rancho Cucamonga Period of Significance: 1915-1960 Property Type: Service Station Applicable Criteria: Local Landmark (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) At the turn of the century in the early 1900's, new inventions necessitated different types of development throughout the nation. The automobile became the main source of transportation and the old U.S. Highway (Route 66) was built in 1926 in response to this emerging industry. During the Great Depression, travelers from around the nation seeking a new life used US Route 66 to turn the California dream into a reality for a new beginning. The Cucamonga Service Station is the only station remnant of roadside architecture prevalent in the 1920's, 30's and 40's that still exists in Rancho Cucamonga today. It was built by one of the Klusman brothers, Henry, a recognized local citizen during the early days of Cucamonga. B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes). i54+c.... •" *B12. References: - Historical Documents(Rancho Cucamonga Planning Dept) -►;--;_- -'{;,r -_ ,, - - SB County Assessors web-page httpl/nppublic.co.san-bemardino.ca.us s 1 - "Guide To Historic Route 66 in California" by the California Historic Route 66 Association fi B13. Remarks: Specialty Commercial(SC)Zone in the Foothill Blvd. District C Sz a, .1 1 0 Threats: Private Development and Vandalism i e - " • *B14. Evaluator: Beth Hartley i Y , *Date of Evaluation: 12/2008 .r�■.,�H_________. ,s _ z j L o cam, 3� if d '1 ■ I LEys E---I.-- 716 State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# Pell DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ___—SKETCH MAP Trinomial Page 3 of 4 Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) Cucamonga Service Station *Drawn By: Beth Hartley *Date: 1127109 ESTACIA COURT RESIDENTIAL 0 r D 0 D m z c m COMMERCIAL CUCAMONGA SERVICE STATION 9670 FOOTHILL BLVD. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD(HISTORIC US ROUTE 66) (This space reserved for official comments.) I I Scale 1" = 100' DPR 523K(1/95) *Required information State of California—The Resources Agency Primary# P DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PHOTOGRAPH RECORD Trinomial Page 4 of 4 Resource Name or#: (Assigned by recorder) Cucamonga Service Station i R itt {+'11i-rn�r .. f ' Pi p.r. I 44 .. "se- .1"�ON ir��► �b ^_ E_ _ is r►t►to,•' A - . i r!` ,GAR' eta 11r k, . i J-y�yJ 1yj s+nin se, 7Li�7t . .„..„., „,..13 W-4,VO.',04.g.7.4 ': . A ' .• ' '-j-"•'.1''.. .4.•-'1.7.-,',.'..':".' i ; ' \ iS- j Photo courtesy of Nadine Eshelman _ Photo courtesy of Historical Preservation Association THE 1920'S (I fir` •'Id CUCA rAGA - I J 1 i; . ,E=v.C' ..TAT lh • ARAGE r. eej t a µV1 .e: ' le t - ,- .-----.:. I . - Photo courtesy of Historical Preservation Association Photo courtesy of Historical Preservation Association The 1960's The 1970's(no longer In service) - . Alk j,..\ 7-- I 4 r .-4. . , ; i 1r):, i ..•-, . t . :‘, • fl: : . I j ``;. I ` _� — _ .. •.;:„.; _ t - i Today DPR 523K(1/95) *Required information sec.., P63 �. Dlf..."',., teill' '4 li ��4 *1 �i. ; x, '222012 ' � .I or" _ Im 5 \ ule tlS.. � � .� q_g82 107 44^A P * fit — AO IIPA1 .. 1r .. . ...r- 1 - .400/401.,--4463..... am,■-480... ..... - ... ......- ' 09. IrilrOlk.`-Wattir4t-NIPPA1041,464114:41414.1VOWa.5., - . i Sc ✓�"14-,5-rj G Lce.9�Z7 - . .4r .k,',;,' - 1 - * .,,,;44,.. .. ....,... ..„--!J .... lr k , 4, ,,, t �_; i ! e. . 1., ..2 __„ . , ,.r. EXHIBIT C ? - x {. - f-- _ - rc. 6 /iY/a —52,a771(---- -5:/'� G,6!/�4i;7- J P 6 4 . r' RED MAY 22 2012 ri _ 1 . , , ritio illA, ' ..... : - 7 ril si- _or _ _. . r. ._ 1! H.■ Fmkt 1, . I. .t:I' ) .,;. ' ( . . , --.,........... ' • - ... ... . / i 7,'-7/ --/,'—r 7,- . --............, _...., '. . 041PirligiripPr4illir 11111r4Pr oppellr e OA* ....6.... . . . , „...,, igi.::„....;......:::1, . i. i . JIPPIPI. '',.. .,..- rfP ;,4] > 4111 -J...,. l'''''.1". r,11r,.. , . ..* . 0101 I Is • )10 4 \ ■7.1T f,T1-46-tp, III°411 - P65 FEED MAY 22 2012 ',-.,•N ..,:-_:‘.: -• , . , " /.... I,it1/4 / 'iii ;. .., . ir . . . , '\' .'1 ( - '1F1'. dire'= .-;ervdriArr. IF: 7 ..-i,f, . -. ... ,,,. . .. , „ , e f' �rrn 1 1 + 1 + , 1' i 1 ■ \ \ \ \' * \ N:, `(ri 1 + " `"� • `.`.fj _ r I�Y B Wild*WO r' .�^\t,"°� 101111 d a °��dl w�� �'�`'• i ' , \ \ \ .s, r t,..,,. , ,. .14". • a.\\ N.,,,.\,, \ \ \ \ 1 ' \ ' .' \ \ 4 VI 4 4 . \\I \ \ , . ., _, .+ + • 1 \ iUO,e-T�� '/ "/Zvo, ,„ ,i4/ P66 RESOLUTION NO. 09-072 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HISTORIC LANDMARK DRC2009.00069, DESIGNATING THE CUCAMONGA SERVICE STATION A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 9670 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0208.153-05. A. Recitals. 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga filed an application for Landmark Designation DRC2009-00059, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as"the application." 2. On February 25 and continued to March 11,2009,the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and recommended approval. 3. On April 15, 2009, the City Council held their meeting and approved Landmark Designation DRC2009-00069. 4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately 0.2-acre of land, a rectangular-shaped configuration, located at 9670 Foothill Boulevard. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council, including minutes of the public hearing by the Historic Preservation Commission on February 25,2009,and March 11,2009, written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony,and pursuant to Section 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Council hereby makes the following findings and facts: a. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of a historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. Fact/s: It is the only surviving gas station reminiscent of roadside architecture in Rancho Cucamonga today. The style and type of this building was popular during auto mobilization. It is a great example of Mission-style architecture. EXHIBIT 03-/.3 ' r P67 Resolution No. 09-072 Page 2 of 4 Finding 2: The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building that was once common but is now rare. Fact/s: It is the only building left of its type in Rancho Cucamonga that was once common, but now rare. There was a gas station on the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue (Pearson Filling Station and Garage) in a similar-style, which was demolished in the1990s. Finding 3: The proposed Landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. Fact/s: The approximated construction date is 1915, which would make it at least 93 years old. Finding 4: The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned or important or a local personality. Facts: And! Morris and Arvid Lewis were both locally involved with the community. According to a Daily' Bulletin article dated February 15, 1994, Mr. Lewis was the first full-time fire chief of the Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Finding 5: The proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use,which was once common but is now rare. Facts: Route 66 runs through eight states: Illinois, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California. Servicing • automobiles for travelers utilizing the road was once a very popular practice throughout these states. Finding 6: The architect or builder was important. Facts: Henry Klusman built the structure. He and his brother were well known in the Cucamonga area and were responsible for building many important structures including reservoirs, houses, and the Virginia Dare Winery. b. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: Finding 1: The overall effect of the design of the proposed Landmark is beautiful or its details and materials are beautiful or unusual. Fact/s: As it stands today, this is the only Mission-style gas station that survives in Rancho Cucamonga from its period of significance,which makes the structure unusual and unique. c. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: Finding 1: The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. • P68 Resolution No. 09-072 Page 3 of 4 Facts: The gas station creates a more visual interest to the surrounding area. Under the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, this area is designated Specialty Commercial because of the ties to the area to early Cucamonga. Although much of it is no longer present, the presence of the gas station is a firm reminder of early auto mobilization and Cucamonga's Route 66 history. Finding 2: The proposed Landmark, in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. Fact/s: This gas station undoubtedly brings back familiar memories of the Route 66 phenomenon. 4. The Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. The Council finds that this Landmark Designation is exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines,Section 15308, as a Class 8 exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves Landmark Designation DRC2009-00069. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • • • Please soothe e following pogo for formal adoption.certification and signatures P69 Resolution No. 09-072 Page 4 of 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15t day of April 2009. AYES: Gutierrez, Kurth, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None 0.111 ANL Donald J. Kurth, M.0., Mayor ATTEST: • • i,c04,utce ice C. Reynolds, C' Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 15t day of April 2009. Executed this 16'" day of April 2009, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. � �u of ,1— nice C. Reynolds, Cit Clerk P70 RESOLUTION NO. 13-095 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING MILLS ACT AGREEMENT NO. 13- 148 (ARTICLE 12, SECTION 50280 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE) FOR THE HISTORIC LANDMARK PROPERTY, LOCATED AT 9670 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD -APN: 0208-153-05. WHEREAS, both the owner and City desire to protect and preserve such property so as to retain its characteristics of historical significance. A. Recitals. 1. The owner(s), Route 66 IECA, of the subject property have requested implementation of a Mills Act (Article 12, Section 50280 of the California Government Code). 2. Designation of the subject property as a Historic Landmark is a requirement prior to proceeding with the initiation of the Mills Act. 3. The Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga designated the subject property as a Historic Landmark on April 15, 2009. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part"A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The parties in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth in the attached Mills Act Contract marked Exhibits A, B1, B2 and C are agreed upon. 3. The City Council approves the Mills Act Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 4. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has accepted to enter into an agreement(contract)with the property owner, thus initiating the Mills Act. P71 #RECORDING REQUESTED BY and when RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk, City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 19th day of June, 2013, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City") and Route 66 IECA (Inland Empire California) (hereinafter referred to as the 'Owner") . W I T N E S S E T H A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code section 50280, et seq. authorize cities to enter into contracts with the Owners of qualified Historical Property to provide for the use, maintenance and restoration of such Historical Property so as to retain its characteristics as property of historical significance; (ii) owner possesses fee title in and to that certain real property, together with associated structures and improvements thereon, commonly known as the Cucamonga service station and generally located at the street address 9670 -1- P72 • Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (hereinafter such property shall be referred to as the "Historic Property") . A legal description of the Historic Property is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and is incorporated herein by this reference; (iii) on April 15, 2009, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted its Resolution No.09-072 thereby declaring and designating the Historic Property as a historic landmark pursuant to the terms and provisions of chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal code; and, (iv) City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this agreement both to protect and preserve the characteristics of historical significance of the Historic Property and to qualify the Historic Property for an assessment of valuation pursuant to the Provisions of Chapter 3, of Part 2, of Division 1 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. B. Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, City and owner, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, do hereby agree as follows: 1. Effective Date and Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall be effective and commence on June 19, 2013, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten years thereafter. Each year upon the anniversary of the effective date, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in paragraph 2, below. 2. Renewal . Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "renewal date") , a year shall automatically be added to the initial term of this Agreement unless notice of nonrenewal is mailed as provided herein. If either owner or city desires in any year not to renew the Agreement, owner or city shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party in advance of the annual renewal ' date of the Agreement. unless such notice is served by owner to city at least 90 days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by city to owner at least 60 days prior to the annual renewal date, one year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. owner may make a written protest -2- P73 of the notice. city may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to owner of nonrenewal . If either city or owner serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply. 3. Standards for Historical Property. During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements, and restrictions: a. Owner shall preserve and maintain the characteristics of historical significance of the Historic Property. Attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "B," and incorporated herein by this reference, is a list of those minimum standards and conditions for maintenance, use, and preservation of the Historic Property, which shall apply to such property throughout the term of this Agreement. b. Owner shall , where necessary, restore and rehabilitate the property according to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation and in accordance with the attached schedule of potential home improvements, drafted by the applicant and approved by the City Council , attached hereto as Exhibit "C. " c. owner shall allow reasonable periodic examinations, by prior appointment, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the county Assessor, State Department of Parks and Recreation, State Board of Equalization, and the city, as may be necessary to determine owner's compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 4. Provision of Information of Corporation. owner hereby agrees to furnish City with any and all information requested by the City which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. 5. cancellation. City, following a duly noticed public hearing as set forth in California Government Code Sections 50280, et seq. , may cancel this -3- P74 Agreement if it determines that Owner breached any of the conditions of this Agreement or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified historic property. City may also cancel this Agreement if it determines that the owner has failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in subparagraph 3(b) of this Agreement. In the event of cancellation, owner may be subject to payment of those cancellation fees set forth in California Government Code sections 50280, et seq. 6. Enforcement of Agreement. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of this Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions of this Agreement by Owner, City shall give written notice to owner by registered or certified mail addressed to the address stated in this Agreement, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City within 30 days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default if said breach or default cannot be cured within 30 days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within 30 days and must thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by owner) , then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal , for injunctive relief against any violation by owner or apply for such other relief as may be appropriate. City does not waive any claim of default by Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City's regulations governing historic properties are available to the City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default herein under. 7. Binding Effect of Agreement. The owner hereby subjects the Historic Property described in Exhibit "A" hereto to the covenants, reservations, -4- P75 and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. City and owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations, and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon the Owner's successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Each and every contract, deed or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property, or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the covenants, reservations, and restrictions expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, reservations, and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed or other instrument. City and owner hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants, reservations, and restrictions set forth herein touch and concern the land in that Owner's legal interest in the Historic Property is rendered less valuable thereby. City and Owner hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of such covenants, reservations, and restrictions touch and concern the land by enhancing and maintaining the historic characteristics and significance of the Historic Property for the benefit of the public and Owner. 8. Notice. Any notice required to be given by the terms of this Agreement shall be provided at the address of the respective parties as specified below or at any other address as may be later specified by the parties hereto. To City: City of Rancho cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Attention: Planning Director To owner: Route 66 IECA c/o Anthony Gonzalez 10808 Foothill Boulevard, suite 160 Rancho cucamonga, CA 91730 -5- P76 9. General Provisions. a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions, or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise. b. owner agrees to and shall hold city and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of owner or those of his contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on his behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. c. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, reservations, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever. d. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney's fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court. -6- P77 e. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby. f. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the state of California. 10. Recordation. No later than 20 days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the city shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the county Recorder of the county of san Bernardino. The owner shall be responsible for any fees required by the county for recording this Agreement. 11. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, • only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, city and owner have executed this Agreement on the day and year first written above. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: By: L. Dennis Michael , Mayor Dated: By: Route 66 IECA owner -7- P78 2013 All Capacity Acknowledgment STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) CIVIL CODE, SECTION 1181, 1184) On ********, before me, Adrian Garcia, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, personally appeared L. Dennis Michael, Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature of Officer Adrian Garcia Assistant City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga P79 LEGAL DESCRIPTION for Route 66 IECA 9670 Foothill Boulevard Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 LUCAS AND WARD SUB LOT 1 AND S 20 FT LOT 10EX S 20 FT HGWY LOT 1 Exhibit "A" -10- P80 THE SECRETARY OF INTERIOR'S REHABILITATION STANDARDS 1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property that requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site, and its environment, or to the use of a property for its originally intended purpose. 2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure, or site, and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historical material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible. 3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations which have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged. 4. changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site, and its environment. 5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship, which characterize a building, structure, or site, shall be treated with sensitivity. 6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, wherever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historical , physical , or pictorial evidence, rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from other buildings or structures. 7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the most gentle means possible. sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken. 8.Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and preserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to, any acquisition, protection, stabilization, preservation, rehabilitation, restoration, or reconstruction project. 9. Contemporary design for alteration and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historic, architectural , or cultural material and such design is compatible with the size, scale, color, material , and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment. 10. wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that, if such additions or alterations were to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired. Exhibit "B-1" -11- P81 PROPERTY MAINTENANCE Property Maintenance. All buildings, structures, yards and other improvements shall be maintained in a manner which does not detract from the appearance of the immediate neighborhood. The following conditions are prohibited: 1. Dilapidated, deteriorating, or unrepaired structures, such as: fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; 2. scrap lumber, junk, trash or debris; 3. Abandoned, discarded or unused objects or equipment, such as automobiles, automobile parts, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, cans, containers, or similar items; 4. stagnant water or excavations, including pools or spas; 5. Any device, decoration, design, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition or its inappropriate location. EXHIBIT "B-2" -12- P82 POTENTIAL STRUCTURE/SITE IMPROVEMENTS for Route 66 IECA 9670 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 The following is a list of renovation projects the applicant plans to complete. Future projects proposed by the applicant or by the legal inheritors of this contract will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission's staff. ITEM TASK A. SOFT COSTS 1. Architecture & Engineering 2. Entitlement Process (Certificate of Appropriateness) 3. Utility Agencies Coordination and Approvals 4. Planning Review and Approval 5. Building Plan Check and Approval 6. All City and Agency Fees and Permits B. SITE WORK 1. Demolition of Existing concrete and paving patch and repair 2. Remove & replace existing retaining wall at north property line 3. Remove existing tree at north property line 4. Trench for underground utilities 5. Install new water, sewer, gas and electrical service 6. Install new irrigation system 7. Install new concrete or AC paving 8. Install new landscaping C. SERVICE STATION BUILDING 1. Fumigate or mitigate all termite or insect infestation 2. Remove & replace all damaged and deteriorated wall framing (plates Studs, headers) 3. Remove & replace damaged roof structure and reframe with new rafters and ceiling joists 4. Remove & replace all window frames & glass 5. Remove and replace all door frames and doors 6. Remove all existing service conduit and fixtures 7. Install new electrical service, power and lighting 8. Install new water service 9. Install interior drywall and paint 10. Install new vinyl tile flooring 11. Install new TPO roof and roof drains and flashing 12. Install new FAU unit 13. Patch & repair existing stucco 14. Re-stucco or fog coat D. NEW RESTROOM BUILDING 1. Install new sewer, water and electrical service 2. Build new restroom building per drawing E. NEW SERVICE GARAGE BUILDING 1. Install new sewer, water and electrical service 2. Build new service garage building per plan F. MISCELLANEOUS ACCESSORIES & EQUIPMENT 1. Installation of new station equipment, pumps, hoses, signs and memorabilia EXHIBIT C -13- P83 STAFF REPORT • t% ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP 147. RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager • From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Manuel Pilonieta, Information Systems Manager f" Sam Davis, Information Services Analyst II 4•0 Keri Hinojos, Senior Buyer, CPPB Subject: AWARD THE PURCHASE OF VMWARE SOFTWARE SUPPORT RENEWALS TO INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR IN THE AMOUNT OF $61,455, UTILIZING US COMMUNITIES IT PRODUCTS AND SERVICES CONTRACT 4400001195. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council award the purchase of VMware support renewals to Insight Public Sector in the amount of $61,455, utilizing US Communities IT Products and Services contract 4400001195, funded by account number 1001209-5300. BACKGROUND The Information Services Division has standardized on industry leading VMware software to provide consolidation of central computer servers, thereby decreasing support costs and improving management. In support of maintaining the City's computer services, support agreements are purchased to provide staff access to VMware's technical support and obtain software updates. In coordination with the Purchasing Division, the Information Services Division submitted specifications for the renewal of VMware's virtualization software. The Purchasing Division determined that utilizing a competitively bid US Communities Contract (Contract) to be in the City's best interest. The Contract has been awarded to Insight Public Sector; which will provide software support through June 30, 2014 with the option of three (3) additional one (1) year renewals. All contract documentation is on file in the Purchasing Division. U.btk-1) Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services P84 STAFF REPORT t�y ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP L -p RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Manuel Pilonieta, Information Services Manage Michael Scott, Information Services Analyst Ken Hinojos, Senior Buyer, CPP:;r Subject: APPROVAL TO PURCHASE CISCO SMARTNET MAINTENANCE THROUGH NEXUS IS, INC., UTILIZING COMPETITIVELY BID COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CONTRACT NUMBER RIVCO-20120-002-5/13 IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $101,200. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the purchase of Cisco Smartnet Maintenance through Nexus IS, Inc. utilizing competitively bid County of Riverside Contract number RIVCO-20120-002- 5/13, funded by account number 1001209-5300, in an amount not to exceed $101,200. BACKGROUND/ANAYLSIS In support of maintaining the City's network services, the Information Services Division enters into annual hardware and software maintenance agreements. These support agreements provide staff access to Cisco Smartnet technical support, allow for the repair or replacement of failed components, and provide updates to system software. The Information Services Division provided specifications to the Purchasing Division for review and to determine the best method of procurement. The Purchasing Division determined that utilizing a competitively bid Riverside County Contract, CO NO. RIVCO-20420-002-5/13 awarded to Nexus IS, Inc., to be in the City's best interest. The contract amount will not exceed $101,200, and funds for this contract are included in the FY 13/14 Budget. All contract documentation is on file in the Purchasing Division. Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services P85 Q9/4 STAFF REPORT COMNIUN=SERVICES DEPARTMENT L J Date: June 19, 2013 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Subject: APPROVAL TO PURCHASE REPLACEMENT PLAY EQUIPMENT FROM LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES, INC. FOR THE GOLDEN OAK AND MOUNTAIN VIEW PLAYGROUNDS, UTILIZING A COMPETITIVELY BID COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AWARDED BY HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL (HGAC CONTRACT NO. PR 11-12), AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF $42,588.39, PLUS $7,412.00, CONTINGENCY TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 1120401-5650/180120-0 (PARK DEVELOPMENT - GOLDEN OAK PARK) AND $149,552.04 PLUS $448.00 CONTINGENCY TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 1134303-5650/1833134-0 (LMD 4R - MOUNTAIN VIEW PARK) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the purchase of replacement play equipment from Landscape Structures, Inc., for the Golden Oak and Mountain View Park Playgrounds, utilizing a competitively bid cooperative agreement awarded by Houston-Galveston Area Council (HGAC Contract No. PR 11-12) and authorize the expenditure of $ 42,588.39, plus $ 7,412.00, contingency to be funded from Account 1120401-5650/180120-0 (Park Development - Golden Oak Park) and $149,552.04 plus $ 448.00 contingency to be funded from Account 1134303-5650/1833134-0 (LMD 4R - Mountain View Park). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Due to a combination of continual, heavy use from regular park users, and age of the play structures, which were installed in 2000, it is necessary to replace portions of the existing play equipment at Golden Oak and Mountain View Parks. The existing structures at both sites have been evaluated by Landscape Structures representatives, and it has been determined that the majority of the structures are in good condition and that only portions of the structures will need to be replaced to provide compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) as well as the Consumer Product Safety Guidelines, resulting in a considerable cost savings, as compared with replacement of entire structures. In addition, additional rubber surfacing is being added to both play areas to provide improved access to the play equipment in compliance with the ADA. It is anticipated that these improvements will be completed by September 2013. Respectfully submitted, No�t c.) NIGH Nettie Nielsen Community Services Director P86 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT bPJ RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer�j Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer J', Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $64,635.00, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, RSB GROUP INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,463.50, FOR THE 24TH STREET AT DEER CREEK CHANNEL — BRIDGE REPAIR PROJECT TO BE FUNDED FROM DRAINAGE FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 11123035650/1812112-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $64,635.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, RSB Group Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $6,463.50, for the 24th Street at Deer Creek Channel — Bridge Repair Project to be funded from Drainage Funds, Account No. 11123035650/1812112-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on May 29, 2013, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $55,874.55. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of upgrading existing bridge guard rails to current standards and maintenance of concrete deck with crack seal. It is estimated that approximately one job will be either generated or sustained in connection with this project. The contract documents call for twenty- five (25) working days to complete this construction. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/CB/SH:Is Attachments Put- VICINITY MAP 24TH STREET AT DEER CREEK CHANNEL BRIDGE REPAIR PROJECT e k At.. N■ a ai,1/4„ 1 as w. ir' > ! o Z% 4 srs�r FAN MH '! Erg1=1l1., ___ YISW AV . _ WT ig BAMYW$T /� InNIIII11.4174190111.a,«row �— Ian.._, � �� , ST.--�,rm. S G R R r , .N.N. 1 ir . AK UPLAND It I 1 • • :LI1/a„ ►� _1rEIIIIIII,-irILIIM ,:.-aJaw. ESIMIgil ILIA 111.111110‘111.1"g=a t WAUL tM rn i; }.�=. , ons PROJECT 1-10 FREEWAY LOCATION i Lj 2 S z H ARROW R• TE w i. II Qri�f�1 � I !, Q 25th FERON r�` 24th Q `�?�CHU :OLT fl Ld ir Ld 2 L • BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAV 29,2013 APPARENT LOW BIDDER 2 3 P88 AToM Engineering Deer Creek Channel at 24th St.-Bridge Repair Project ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE RBB Group Inc Construction Inc Vido Semerzleh Inc UNIT UNIT BID UNIT 1 BID BID NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST 1 AMOUNT UNIT COST I AMOUNT 1 I LS Traffic control and detour signing $1,840.80 S 1,840.80 $20.400.001 $20,400.00 $7,729001 57,729.00 $2500.001 $2,500.00 2 783 SF Remove P.C.C.sidewalk $2.00 $1,566.00 $2.00 $1,566.00 $4.001 $3,132.00 $4.001 $3,132.00 3 5 LF Remove P.C.C.curb&gutter $3.00 $15.00 $20.00 $10000 $135.00 $675.00 $20.00 $100.00 A.C,pavement and aggregate $8,918.00 $2,001 $8,918.00 $2.00 $8,918.00 $4.00 $17,836.00 4 4459 SF base/subgrade $2.00 5 5 LF Construct curb $2000 SI00.00 $24001 $120.00 $325.00 $1625.00 $100.00 $500.00 6 182 LF Construct P.C.C.curb and gutter $25.00 $4,550.00 $30001 $5,460.00 $30.001 $5,460.00 $65.001 $11,830.00 7 458 SF Construct P.C.C.drive approach $8.00 $3,664.00 $6001 $2,746.00 36.001 $2,748.00 $14.001 $6,412.00 8 783 SF Construct 4"P.C.C.sidewalk $4.00 $3,132.00 $4.001 $3,132.00 $6.001 $4,698.00 $7.001 $5,481.00 Construct 8"P.C.C.sidewalk at back of $780.00 $9501 $1,014.00 $7.501 $1,170.00 $19001 $1,560.00 9 156 SF P.C.C.drive approach $5.00 10 58 SF Construct P.C.C.local depression $5.00 5290.00 $10.001 $580.00 $8,001 5464.00 $75.001 8870.00 11 100 TON Construct A.C.pavement $180.00 518,000.00 $110001 $11,000.00 $155.001 $15,500.00 3135.001 $13,500.00 12 120 TON Construct crushed aggregate base $48.00 $5,760.00 $30.001 $3,600.00 $75001 $9,000.00 $35001 $4,200.00 13 2 CF Remove and repair unsound concrete $400.00 $800.00 $100.001 $200.00 $900.001 $1,800.00 $2,500.001 $5,000.00 14 1049 SF Clean bridge deck $1.00 $1,049.00 $1.001 $1,049.00 $3.001 $3,147.00 $2.001 $2,098.00 15 1049 SF' Me[hacrylate resin treatment $2.75 $2,884.75 $2.001 $2,098.00 $4.001 $4,196.00 $4001 $4,196.00 16 15 GAL Furnish methacryLlte resin $80.00 $1,200.00 $50.001 $750.00 $300.001 $4,500.00 $130001 $1,950.00 $525.00 $300.001 $900.00 $500.001 $1,500.00 $300.001 $900.00 17 3 EA Adjust utility box&cover to finish grade $175.00 18 2 EA Construction notification signs $400.00 $800.00 $500.001 $1,000.00 $1,350.001 $2,700.00 $500.001 $1 00000 TOTAL I $56,870.63 I $64,635.00 $78,962.00 $83,065.00 I BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 29,2013 4 5 P89 Peterson.Chase General West Coast Structures Engineering Construction Deer Creek Channel at 24th St.-Bridge Repair Project Inc Inc. UNIT UNIT I BID NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST 1 AMOUNT 1 1 LS Traffic control and detour signing 11 375.53 $ 11,375.53 $10.000001 $10,000.00 2 783 SF Remove P.C.C.sidewalk 2.74 52,145.42 $5.001 $3,915.00 3 5 LF Remove P.C.C.curb&gutter 46.00 $230.00 $20.001 $100.00 A.C.pavement and aggregate 3.54 515,784.86 $4.201 $18,727.80 4 4459 SF base/subgrade 5 5 LF Construct curb 160.81 $804.05 $100.001 $500.00 6 182 LF Construct P.C.C.curb and gutter 32.25 $5,869.50 $50.001 $9,100.00 7 458 SF Construct P.C.C.drive approach 26.66 $12,210.28 $40.001 $18.320.00 8 783 SF Construct 4"P.C.C.sidewalk 6.95 55,441.85 $14001 $10,962.00 Construct 8"P.C.C.sidewalk at back of 7.34 31.145.04 $15.001 $2340.00 9 156 SF P.C.C.drive approach 10 58 SF Construct P.C.C.local depression 52.98 33,072.84 $45.001 $2,61000 11 100 TON Construct A.C.pavement 206.50 520,650.00 $180.001 $18,000.00 12 120 TON Construct crushed aggregate base 86.89 $10,426.80 small $8,400.00 13 2 CF Remove and repair unsound concrete 771.79 $1,543.58 $200.001 $400.00 14 1049 SF Clean bridge deck 2.89 $3,031.61 $2.001 $2,098.00 15 1049 SF Methacrylate resin treatment 2.36 $2,475.64 $3.001 $3,147.00 16_ 15 GAL Furnish methacrylate resin 65.00 5975.00 $60.001 $900.00 17 3 EA Adjust utility box&cover to finish grade 150.00 5450.00 $100.001 $300.00 18 2 EA Construction notification signs 823.50 $1,647.00 $300001 $800.00 TOTAL 1 $99,279.00 $110,419.80 2 P90 STAFF REPORT LaENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT i RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Curt Billings, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $218,479.80, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, DD SYSTEMS INC. DBA ACE CD INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,847.98, FOR THE DEER CREEK CHANNEL BIKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS FROM BASE LINE ROAD TO HIGHLAND AVENUE TO BE FUNDED FROM SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL AND BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS, ACCOUNT NOS. 12343035650/1709234-0 AND 1110316-5650/1709110-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $218,479.80, to the lowest responsive bidder, DD Systems Inc. dba Ace CD Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $21,847.98, for the Deer Creek Channel Bike Trail improvements from Base Line Road to Highland Avenue to be funded from Safe Routes to School and Beautification Funds, Account Nos. 12343035650/1709234-0 and 1110316-5650/1709110-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 4, 2013, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $205,445.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of clearing and grubbing, AC pavement, slurry seal, pipe gate, guard post, chain link fence, mow curb, signs and striping. It is estimated that approximately three jobs will be either generated or sustained in connection with this project. The contract documents call for twenty (20) working days to complete this construction. Respectfully submitted, Mark. A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/CB/SH:Is Attachments P91\ PROJECT LOCATION / _ili_ HILLSI[[ RD LCV WILSON i© I WILSON AVE I / a > a 1 J W BANYAN ST _ a el ��1 I [o BANYAN ST / —] LEMON ST D �i C .11 L3,1 IBANYAN STII - I U a. 210 I-21{ — —, 1 w l ` HIGHLAND I [.` H z i , z 19TH ST J� 1 LL w NCTCRIA 1TREET /w A. K } u J w w I t� 0' VICTORIA ARY' LN n a m a BASE LINE �� u i �� CHURCH 5 J � D te] \ / F00 HILL BLVD 3 BAN BERN ' a L C J r�l O J L .J� (-; r - -lE � �`'- -Is 41 a w � �� 66ziJ w� a > ARROW ROUTE a aI. oi � w� nc 1 a11 � N � � - w IX al.[ . P[ w C =1 [ -� F w _ _ w EC = I 7 ■ _ a 1 6TH ST ct • 1 II J 4TH ST _ _ a CITY OF R ANCHO CUCAMONGA IP wori 1 PROPOSED DEER CREEK TRAIL g4 4.1 BETWEEN BASE LINE RD. AND HIGHLAND AVE. `�.0 LOCATION MAP N.T.S. BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JUNE 4,2013 APPARENT LOW BIDDER 2 3 P92 Deer Creek Channel Bike Trail improvements from Base Line Road to Highland Avenue ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Ace CD Inc Yakar Laird Construction Co,Inc UNIT I UNIT BID UNIT BID BID NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST AMOUNT Mobilization,clearing&grubbing, including removal of boulders,rocks, chain link fence and gate,wrought iron fence,steel rails,posts,shrubs,step $ 26,000.00 S 26,000 00 $15,902.00 $15,902.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $186,228.00 $186,228.00 thru,misc.concrete. Restore irrigation system,including relocating sprinkler 1 1 LS head A.C.pavement,including sawcutting $ 97 00 $97,000.00 $97.35 $97,350.00 $135.001$135,000.00 $75.001 $75,000.00 2 1000 TON,and removal of existing Construct slurry seal,Type II,including crack sealant,weed kill and A.C. $ 4.00 $28,800.00 $. 8.319 $59,896.80 $3.25 $23,400.00 $5.00 $36,000.00 3 7200 SY grinding Construct pipe gate,per SBCFCD SP 209,chain link fence per City Std.607, $ 40,000.00 $40,000.00 $12,001.00 $12,001.00 $16,500.00 $16,500.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 and guard post with galvanized cable 4 1 IS per bollard detail 5 63 LF 8"Mow curb $ 15.00 $945.00 $16.501 $1,039.50 $45.001 $2,835.00 $75.001 $4,725.00 6 1 LS Install signs and striping $ 8,000.00 $8,000.00 $16,230.501 $16,230.50 $22,755.00 $22,755.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 7 1 LS Traffic Control $ 1000.00 $1,000.00 $4,950.001 $4,950.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 8 1 LS Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan $ 1,100.00 $1,100.00 $3,850.001 $3,850.00 $4,250.00 $4,250.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Install Advance Construction $ 350.00 $1,400.00 $715.00 $2,860.00 $900.00 $3,600.00 $1,000.00 $4,000.00 9 4 EA Notification signs 10 8 EA Install 2'x 2'signs on Type 1 Barricade $ 150.00 $1,20000 $550.00 $4,400.00 $250.00 $2,000.00 $500.00 $4,000.00 TOTAL 1 $205,445.00 $218,479.80 $246,840.00 $359,953.00 1 P93 STAFF REPORT ENCINEI'.xING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 6,1 Date: June 19, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer Al Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $144,970.00, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, J.D.C. INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,497.00, FOR THE ETIWANDA AVENUE SIDEWALKS, CURB AND GUTTER, RAMPS, AND FLASHING BEACONS, ADJACENT TO GRAPELAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND ETIWANDA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL, TO BE FUNDED FROM SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL GRANT, GAS TAX AND CITYWIDE INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDS, ACCOUNT NOS. 234303-5650/1837234-0, 1174303-5650/1685174-0 AND 1198303-5650/1837198-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $144,970.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, J.D.C. Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $14,497.00, for the Etiwanda Avenue sidewalks, curb and gutter, ramps, and flashing beacons, adjacent to Grapeland Elementary School and Etiwanda Intermediate School, to be funded from Safe Routes to School Grant, Gas Tax and Citywide Infrastructure Funds, Account Nos. 234303-5650/1837234-0, 1174303-5650/1685174-0 and 1198303-5650/1837198-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 4, 2013, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $179,650.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of clearing and grubbing, tree removal, construction of 10" cobblestone curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, driveways, A.C. paving and installation of flashing beacon systems. It is estimated that approximately two jobs will be either generated or sustained in connection with this project. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction. Respect ubmitted, M . Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/RMD/SH:Is Attachments P94 aq wti 0. 0 a� ox qV G . z � re q apy y`` al n',pptllpl 0.y p PC I11IMIIIIIIII1pp„'II I^'1 a q� v) iit HuI W IIII `+ ;� � I 0.0. �d < A s A C7 a I Z Q'i 31Y OHVMLL3 p �\ : 0 W e ____ rl �_ .-. 'Ml xT3tlJ AYO Y - it 1 III �H' 'Ha Ara. I = Cn �• 'MYIO 1(3TU AVO �. .� •'. NLi16 531tlYHJ 1.1 r 1 p h.0 - 1} -- - ��i�-' ": , I 3,r Hi mIN �y 1-1 I No- r fit- , p RI • Y 143AYH KS' A.S 11111E1 y.Y VSONtl3H UI`BI'.r , . „ 'y,Y OTI JVVNOIfvgtl 1W 1 awe •MY ___ +®100.1.1 3r�V _�. 31V NYI13 " V8 tAdSVP r pwicaN — 1 IlAgriks � 914&411.0 J BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JUNE 4,2013 APPARENT LOW BIDDER 2 3 P95 Etiwanda Ave sidewalk,curb and gutter,and flashing beacon PTM General improvements at Etiwanda Intermediate School and Engineering Service Crapeland Elementary School .ENGINEERS ESTIMATE J.D.C.Inc. Inc. New Legacy Corp.BID . UNIT UNIT 1 BID UNIT 1 BID_NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT UNIT COST I AMOUNT Clearing&grubbing(include all misc. removals such as pavemet,cobble curb, sidewalk,signs,post,mail boxes, $15,000.00 $ 15 000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00 excavation,saw cutting,grading and 1 I LS disposal) 2 1 LS Relocate sign(see Sheet 2) 1, $500.00 5500.00, $200.001 $200.00 $750.001 $750.00, $900.001 $900.00 Remove and salvage existing beacon $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,000.001 $3,000.00 3 1 LS light and post(see Sheet 4) Remove existing tree(varies 12"to 36" $4,000.00 $20,000.00 $700.001 $3,500.00 $960.001 $4,800.00 $900.001 $4,500.00 4 5 EA diameter)-see plan 5 120 TONS Crushed aggregate base $50.00 $6,000.00 $55.001 $6,600.00 $90.001 $10,800.00 $35.001 $4,200.00 6 100 TONS Asphalt concrete $130.00 513,000.00 $139.00) $13,900.00 $160.001 $16,000.00 $93.001 $9,300.00 PCC Drive approach and PCC driveway 7 1200 SF per plan $15.00 518,000.00 $6.001 $7,200.00 $8.001 $9,600.00 $7.001 $8,400.00 PCC sidewalk per plan and Std.Uwg. $8.00 $45,600.00 $4.001 $22,800.00 $5.001 $28,500.00 $4.00 $22,800.00 0 5700 SF No, 103 _ 9 610 LF 10"cobble curb and 24"gutter per plan $50.00 $30,500.00 $47.001 $28,670.00 $40.001 $24,400.00 $55.001 $33,550.00 Remove and replace existing mail box to a new white Gibraltar Pedestal Mail Box $550.00 51,650.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $450.00 $1,350.00 $475.00 $1,425.00 and Post combo Model PED0000W 10 3 EA complete in place Remove and relocate existing mail box $400.00 $400.00 $200.001 $200.00 $230.001 $230.00 $1,000.001 $1,000.00 11 1 EA complete in place Remove and relocate affected irrigation lines,valves,heads and replant 5-roses $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $3,400.00 $3,400.00 $5,100.00 $5,100.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 as shown on plan(sheet 2)restore 1 12 1 LS affected landscaping in like and kind Install 3/4"PVC irrigation pipe and cap : $20.00 $2,000.00 $6.001 $600.00 $12.00 $1,200.00 $13.001 $1,300.00 13 100 LF per plan Furnish and install Carmanah R920 Series rectangular rapid flashing beacon system or approved equal per manufacturer's specifications and $10,000.00 $20,000.00 $9,200.00 $18,400.00 $12,200.00 $24,400.00 $11,200.00 $22,400.00 general conditions,including two(2) 13' posts per City Std.401-13, four(4)36" 14 2 EA SI-1 and four(4)W16-7P signs _ 15 I LS Traffic Control $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.001 $6,000.00 $4,419.001 $4,419.00 $6,800.001 $6,800.00 TOTAL 1 $t79,650.00 1 $144,970.00 1 $149,049.00 1 $163,575.00 1 DID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JUNE 4,2013 4 5 6 7 P96 Etiwanda Ave sidewalk,curb and gutter,and flashing beacon improvements at Etiwanda Intermediate School and Unique Performance AToM Engineering Crajeland Elementary School Coast.,Inc. GMc Engineering Inc. Construction Inc. Gentry Brothers Inc.BID BID UNIT UNIT BID NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST I AMOUNT COST I AMOUNT COST I AMOUNT UNIT COST I AMOUNT Clearing&grubbing(include all misc. removals such as pavemet,cobble curb, sidewalk,signs,post,mail boxes, S 13,800.00 $ 13,800.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 $20,700.00 $20,700.00 $59,500.00 $59,500.00 excavation,saw cutting,grading and 1 1 LS disposal) 1 1 LS Relocate sign(see Sheet 2) S 345.00 I 5345.00 $650.001 $650.00 $2,700.001 $2,700.00 $200.001 $200.00 Remove and salvage existing beacon S 2,875.00 I $2,875.00 $1,400.001 $1,400.00 $2,500.001 $2,500.00 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 3 1 LS light and post(see Sheet 4) Remove existing tree(varies 12"to 36" $ 1,150.00 55,750.00 $650.001 $3,250.00 $1,000.001 $5,000.00 $1,200.00 $6,000.00 4 5 EA diameter)-see plan 5 120 TONS Crushed aggregate base $ 52.00 I 56,240.00 $55.001 $6,600.00 $61.001 $7,320.00 $40.00 $4,800.00 8 100 TONS Asphalt concrete $ 200,00 I $20,000.00 $160.001 $16,000.00 $150.001 $15,000.00 $120.00. $12,000.00 i PCC Drive approach and PCC driveway I 1200 Si per plan S 11.00 $13,200.00 $5.501 $6,600.00 $8.501 $10,200.00 $8.00 $9,600.00 PCC sidewalk per plan and Std.Dwg. 5 7.00 $39,900.00 $2.751 $15,675.00 $5.401 $30,780.00 $4.00 $22,800.00 8 5700 SE No. 103 9 610 I.F 10"cobble curb and 24"gutter per plan S 50.00 I $30,500.00 $45.001 $27,450.00 $60.001 $36,600.00 $35.001 $21,350.00 Remove and replace existing mail box to a new white Gibraltar Pedestal Mail Box $ 575.00 $1,725.00 $650.00 $1,950.00 $500.00 $1,500.00 $600.00 $1,800.00 and Post combo Model PED0000W 10 3 EA complete in place Remove and relocate existing mail box $ 460.00 1 $460.00 $185.001 $185.00 $325.001 $325.00 $200,001 $200.00 11 1 EA complete in place Remove and relocate affected irrigation lines,valves,heads and replant 5-roses S 4,000.00 54,000.00 $13,750.00 $13,750.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 as shown on plan(sheet 2)restore 12 1 LS affected landscaping in like and kind Install 3/4"PVC irrigation pipe and cap 5 18.00 1 $1,800.00 $3.501 $350.00 $7.001 $700.00 $20.001 $2,000.00 13 100 LF_per plan Furnish and install Carmanah R920 Series rectangular rapid flashing beacon system or approved equal per manufacturer's specifications and S 11,500.00 $23,000.00 $9,155.00 $18,310.00 $7,500.00 $15,000.00 $11,000.00 $22,000.00 general conditions,including two(2) 13' posts per City Std.401-B,four(4)36" 14 2 EA S1-1 and four(4)W16-7P signs 15_ 1 LS Traffic Control S 3,450.00 I $3,450.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $8,037.00 $8,037.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 TOTAL 1 $167,046.00 $170,170.00 $170,362.00 $176,060.00 2 P97 BID SUMMARY FOR RID OPENING JANE 4,2013 8 Etiwanda Ave sidewalk,curb and gutter,and flashing beacon improvements at Etiwanda Intermediate School and Grapeland Elementary School Vido Samarzich Inc. UNIT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT Clearing&grubbing(include all misc. removals such as pavemet,cobble curb, sidewalk,signs,post,mail boxes, $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 excavation,saw cutting,grading and 1 1 LS disposal) 2 1 LS Relocate sign(see Sheet 2) $ 500.00 I $500.00 Remove and salvage existing beacon 3 1 LS light and post(see Sheet 4) $ 4,000.00 54,000.00 Remove existing tree(varies 12"to 36" $ 1 000 00 $5,000.00 4 5 EA diameter)-see plan 5 120 TONS Crushed aggregate base $ 25.00 I $3,000.00 6 100 TONS Asphalt concrete $ 125.001 $12,500.00 PCC Drive approach and PCC driveway $ 9.00 $10,800.00 7 1200 SF per plan PCC sidewalk per plan and Std.Dwg. $ 6.00 $34,200 00 8 5700 SF No. 103 9 610 LF 10"cobble curb and 24"gutter per plan $ 55.00 I $33,550.00 Remove and replace existing mail box to a new white Gibraltar Pedestal Mail Box $ 300 00 $900.00 and Post combo Model PED0000W 10 3 EA complete in place Remove and relocate existing mail box $ 200.00 $200,00 11 1 EA complete in place • Remove and relocate affected irrigation lines,valves,heads and replant 5-roses $ 6,000.00 $6,000.00 as shown on plan(sheet 2)restore 12 1 LS affected landscaping in like and kind Install 3/4"PVC irrigation pipe and cap $ 2000 $2,000.00 13 100 LF per plan Furnish and install Carmanah R920 Series rectangular rapid flashing beacon system or approved equal per manufacturer's specifications and $ 24,200.00 $48,400.00 general conditions,including two(2) 13' posts per City Std.401-B,four(4)36" 14 2 EA S I-1 and four(4)W 16-7P signs 15 1 LS Traffic Control $ 2,000.00 $2,00000 TOTAL $178,050.00 3 P98 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineerin Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF PROFESSION L SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH NINYO & MOORE, SALEM ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. AND CONVERSE CONSULTANTS TO PROVIDE ANNUAL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES FOR FY 2013/2014, WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW ANNUALLY UP TO AN ADDITIONAL TWO YEARS, FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AS APPROVED IN THE BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreements with Ninyo & Moore, Salem Engineering, Inc., Leighton Consulting, Inc. and Converse Consultants to provide annual soils and materials testing services for FY 2013/2014, with an option to renew annually up to an additional two years after review of fees and mutual agreement of both parties, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City as approved in the budget, to be funded from various individual project accounts, and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreements and the City Clerk to attest thereto. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Requests for proposals were sent to consulting firms known to the City, posted on the City web page and forwarded to various green sheet publications to provide soils and materials testing services on an annual basis for various improvement projects within the City. Overwhelming response to the request was received with fifteen (15) firms submitting proposals. After review and rating of the proposals, those submitted from the firms of Ninyo & Moore, Salem Engineering Group, Inc, Leighton Consulting, Inc. and Converse Consultants were accepted as meeting the best needs of the City based on their qualifications, experience, location and schedule of fees. It shall be noted, all the firms, with the exception of Converse Consultants, have provided service to the City for the past three years or longer with favorable results. The proposal submitted from Converse Consultants ranked right up with the other three. Individual capital improvement projects requiring soils and materials testing services will be awarded on a rotating basis between the consulting firms and upon consultant availability. However, because the consulting firms have other clients other than the City and may not be available from time to time, having multiple firms under contract allows the City flexibility in awarding services. Services will be on a time and materials basis in accordance with the schedule of fees and type of project. Because each individual project testing requirement and cost will vary dependent on the P99 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PAGE 2 RE:APPROVE PROFESIONAI.SERVICES AGREEMENTS TO PROVIDE ANNUAL.SOILS AND IMLVrERIAl. TESTING SERVICES FOR FY 2013/2014 JUNE 19,2013 work required, a proposal will be requested from the consultant along with an estimated cost. At that time a requisition will be processed for the services using the account number(s) for the individual project. The total cost for soils and material testing services for each individual project will not exceed the budgeted amount, unless authorized by the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD:Is P100 STAFF REPORT �� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT L�J %" RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Enginee9P Subject: APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH CSD LAND SURVEYING, INC., DAWSON SURVEYING, INC., L.E.H. & ASSOCIATES, WESTLAND GROUP, INC. AND MADOLE & ASSOCIATES TO PROVIDE ANNUAL SURVEY SERVICES FOR FY 2013/2014, WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW ANNUALLY UP TO AN ADDITIONAL TWO YEARS, FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AS APPROVED IN THE BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreements with CSD Land Surveying Inc., Dawson Surveying, Inc., L.E.H. & Associates, West Land Group, Inc. and Madole & Associates to provide annual survey services for FY 2013/2014, with an option to renew annually up to an additional two years after review of fees and mutual agreement of both parties, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City as approved in the budget, to be funded from various individual project accounts, and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreements and the City Clerk to attest thereto. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Requests for proposals were sent to consulting firms known to the City, posted on the City web page and forwarded to various green sheet publications to provide design and construction survey services on an annual basis for various improvement projects within the City. Overwhelming response to the request was received with seventeen (17) firms submitting proposals. After review and rating of the proposals, those submitted from the firms of CSD Land Surveying, Dawson Surveying, Inc., L.E.H. & Associates, and West Land Group, Inc., and Madole & Associates were accepted as meeting the needs of the City based on their qualifications, experience, location and schedule of fees. It shall be noted, all the firms, with the exception of Madole & Associates, have provided service to the City for the past three years or longer with favorable results. The proposal submitted from Madole & Associates ranked right up with the other four. Individual capital improvement projects requiring survey services will be awarded on a rotating basis between the consulting firms and upon consultant availability. However, because the consulting firms have other clients other than the City and may not be available from time to time, having multiple firms under contract allows the City flexibility in awarding services. For Design Survey, services shall be based on a fixed fee total with a cost breakdown for each survey requested. Construction Survey services will be on a time and materials basis in accordance with the schedule of fees and type of project. Because each individual project survey P101 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PAGE?2 RE:APPROVE PROFESSIONAL,SERVICES AGREEMENTS TO PROVIDE ANNUAL.SURVEY SERVICES FOR FY 2013/2014 JUNE 19,2013 requirement and cost will vary dependent on the work required, a proposal will be requested from the consulting firm with either a fixed fee total or estimated cost. At that time a requisition will be processed for the services using the account number(s) for the individual project. The total cost for survey service for each individual project will not exceed the budgeted amount, unless authorized by the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD:Is • P102 7> STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF PROFESSION SERVICES AGREEMENTS WITH AUFBAU CORPORATION, DAN GUERRA & ASSOCIATES AND ONWARD ENGINEERING TO PROVIDE ANNUAL PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTION/CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR FY 2013/2014, WITH AN OPTION TO RENEW ANNUALLY UP TO AN ADDITIONAL TWO YEARS, FOR PROPOSED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AS APPROVED IN THE BUDGET AND INCLUDING A PROVISION FOR DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECK RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreements with Aufbau Corporation, Dan Guerra & Associates, and Onward Engineering to provide annual public works inspection/construction support and engineering support services for FY 2013/2014, with an option to renew annually up to an additional two years after review of fees and mutual agreement of both parties, for proposed capital improvement projects throughout the City as approved in the budget, to be funded from various individual project accounts, including a provision for development plan check, and authorize the Mayor to sign said agreements and the City Clerk to attest thereto. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Requests for proposals were sent to consulting firms known to the City, posted on the City web page and forwarded to various green sheet publications to provide public works inspection/construction support and engineering support services on an annual basis for various improvement projects within the City. Overwhelming response to the request was received with fourteen (14) firms submitting proposals. After review and rating of the proposals, those submitted from the firms of Aufbau Corporation, Dan Guerra & Associates, and Onward Engineering were accepted as meeting the needs of the City based on their qualifications, experience, location and schedule of fees. In fact, Aufbau and Dan Guerra have provided this type of service to the City for many years and are currently providing this service to the City, with favorable results. The proposal submitted from Onward Engineering ranked right up with the other two and, after comparing their schedule of fees or rates, found them to be highly competitive. Due to the workload for inspection services, it is necessary to utilize contract consulting services for Capital Improvement projects. In addition, engineering support services such as plan checking, submittal review, structural calculations, etc. is needed from time to time depending on the complexity of the project. For either service, an estimate will be made and a requisition will be processed for the services using the account number(s) for the individual project. The total cost for P103 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT PACK,2 RE:APPROVE PROFESSIONAL.SERVICES AGRILEMEN'I TO PROVIDE ANNUM.PUBLIC WORKS INSPEC'T'ION/CONSTRUCI'ION SUPPORT AND ENGINBERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR FY 2013/2014 JUNE 19,2013 inspection or construction support service for each individual project will not exceed the budgeted amount, unless authorized by the City Council. In addition, the Professional Services Agreement has a provision for consultant plan check services for Development Projects if the need arises. For any of the services required in the Professional Services Agreement, because the consulting firms have other clients other than the City and may not be available from time to time, having multiple firms under contract allows the City flexibility in awarding services. Respectfully submitted, IVIII.ark A. ever Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/JAD:Is • P104 STAFF REPORT as ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Management Analyst I Subject: APPROVAL TO RENEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (CO#12-075) WITH INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS, INC. FOR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE ARBORS SUBSTATION AND THE MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICE AREA FOR FY 2013/14 TO BE FUNDED FROM 17053035309 AND 17053035603 MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUNDS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the renewal of Professional Services Agreement (CO#12-075) with International Line Builders, Inc. (ILB) in the amount of $165,000.00 for operation and maintenance of the Arbors Substation and the municipal utilities electrical distribution system within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) service area to be funded from Account 170153035309 and 17053035603 Municipal Utility Funds. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS • On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Area. The Arbors Substation was constructed by ILB and became operational supplying permanent load on February 13, 2004. The backbone infrastructure was also installed by ILB and the City began serving Victoria Gardens as well as other developments within the Municipal Utility Service Area with permanent electric service. Staff identified that specialized operation and maintenance services would be required to continue providing dependable service to the RCMU service area. ILB is a full service electrical distribution and transmission power line construction company with 30 years of experience in energy-related facility installation, repair and maintenance services nationwide. A benefit of continuing a contract with ILB is their staff is local and already extremely familiar with the electric infrastructure in Rancho Cucamonga. Given the complexity of the infrastructure, the City would be ensuring it has the most knowledgeable staff working and will guarantee a timely and effective response to any disruption of operations and public safety. Staff research found the rates are reasonable. Respectfully submitted, Mark er Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS: TV P105 STAFF REPORT I� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT six RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Management Analyst I Subject: APPROVAL TO RENEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (CO#12-077) WITH BUTSKO UTILITY DESIGN, INC. FOR TECHNICAL ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SUPPORT WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA UTILITY SERVICE AREA FOR FY 2013/14 TO BE FUNDED FROM 17053035309 MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the renewal of Professional Services Agreement (CO#12-077) with Butsko Utility Design, Inc. in the amount of $131,000.00 for technical electrical engineering support within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service are for FY 2013/14 to be funded 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Area. The Arbors Substation was constructed and became operational supplying permanent load on February 13, 2004. The backbone infrastructure was installed and the City began serving Victoria Gardens as well as other developments within the Municipal Utility Service Area with permanent electric service. Butsko Utility Design, Inc. has been providing electrical engineering and design support since 2001 during the beginning planning stages of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. As the designer of the distribution system, Butsko Utility Design, Inc. is uniquely qualified to provide inspection, design and project management services for these vitally important and time-sensitive projects. They have a broad range of experience from each of California's major energy utilities to small publicly owned electric utilities. Staff confirmed the rates are reasonable and comparable. Respectfully submitted, ark . uer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TV P106 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT L . J RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Trina Valdez, Management Analyst I Subject: APPROVAL TO RENEW PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (CO#12-078) WITH APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR INSTALLATION, CONFIGURATION AND METER READING SERVICES WITHIN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SERVICE AREA FOR FY 2013/14 TO BE FUNDED FROM 17053035309 MUNICIPAL UTILITY FUND RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve and authorize the renewal of Professional Services Agreement (CO#12-078) with Applied Metering Technologies, Inc. in the amount of $132,000.00 for installation, configuration and meter reading services within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility service area for FY 2013/14 to be funded from 17053035309 Municipal Utility Fund. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS • On August 31, 2001, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council authorized the creation and operation of a municipally owned utility for the purpose of providing various utility services to the Victoria Arbors Master Plan Area. The Arbors Substation was constructed and became operational supplying permanent load on February 13, 2004. The backbone infrastructure was installed and the City began serving Victoria Gardens as well as other developments within the Municipal Utility Service Area with permanent electric service. With the ongoing need to provide retail customers with accurate metered electric service, staff found that Applied Metering Technologies, Inc. is the only provider in the area qualified in all aspects of electric meter services. They are certified and used by each of the three Investor Owned Utilities and other publicly owned electric utilities. Staff confirmed the rates are reasonable and comparable. Respectfully submitted, M2' Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:TV �� P107 l`�/ � \ STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 19, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: ACCEPT IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND,AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2010-00348 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF HAVEN AND VALENCIA AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY RALPH'S GROCERY COMPANY RECOMMENDATION The required improvements for DRC2010-00348 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that the City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As a condition of approval of completion of DRC2010-00348, located on the south east corner of Haven and Valencia Avenues, the applicant was required to install related public improvements (traffic signal). All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the standards of the City. Developer: xxxaddresss Release: Faithful Performance Bond # 09062003 $118,500.00 (Bond No.) Respectfully submitted, r Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:CC/alrw Attachment(s) . 3 . a E0 ...'i ,, P108 P . I N E ''. 6— re, , . .. . . . . c4- • a.;7,,,f1 1----. • 2 •;',..• ...• 01 .c.', .4: , ,1- 6 z 1,. 1* ,. tr ii . r- . .1 ci .:i • in • o—o . . .Y.' . ..7, Au.i -:' . _ _ . . •../) . . • .. . I. g . , • •Itc3 41 • . .1: ... . .._ ',7 L.•C1.1,,,,, Cs 2 , 1 _ CO Nr C) V grIel lo I C.) •....r■p: ari C3 C\I . = t 0 r 7 Ct v cc . S 11 4 co rk ■ _ -- . v re E 3 ro • v •i..0.11), . 7 . ..7. V X ii cr) f.. o csi 4,. m to I cu = P1O9 RESOLUTION NO. 13-084 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2010-00348 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DRC2010-00348 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P110 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 4 RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Craig Cruz, Assistant Engineert%- Subject: APPROVAL FOR AN EXPENDITURE OF $102,600.00 TO ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS, INC., FOR THE PURCHASING OF SOFTWARE AND LICENSES FOR THE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CENTER UPGRADE PROJECT CITYWIDE, TO BE FUNDED FROM TRANSPORTATION FUND, ACCOUNT NO. 11243035650/1831124-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve an expenditure in the amount of $102,600.00 to Econolite Control Products, Inc., for the purchasing of software and licenses for the Traffic Management Center Upgrade Project Citywide, to be funded from Transportation fund, Account No. 11243035650/1831124-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As part of the Traffic Management Center Upgrade Project Citywide, purchasing of Centracs software and licenses is necessary to upgrade the City's existing Aries Traffic Management Center software; $99,405.00 of the purchase will be funded from Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Transportation Fund, and the remaining $3,195.00 will be funded from Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Transportation Fund, Account No. 11243035650/1831124-0. The City currently maintains 188 traffic signals, and the majority of these intersections are currently managed by Aries software. Upgrading to Centracs software will provide the latest technology to communicate to our intersections. The direct connection networking as opposed to the master- client communication will allow for a faster, more reliable, and more upgradeable system. Benefits include, but are not limited to, better monitoring and coordination for improved maintenance, traffic flow and safety. This expenditure is a sole source purchase because Centracs is the only equipment that will upgrade and function concurrently with the existing traffic signal communication system. Comparable prices were quoted for the similar size and scope of work in the Cities of Ontario, Anaheim, and Orange. The next phase of this project will be for the installation of the purchased Centracs software, integration at 12 locations, 1 year software maintenance agreement, training and acceptance. Both projects will integrate 12 intersections along 19`h Street and Haven Avenue with the Centracs software and will provide licensing for the remaining intersections throughout the City. As traffic signal communication infrastructure is constructed or renovated, more intersections will be integrated with Centracs until all intersections are managed by Centracs. P111 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Re: Approval for an Expenditure of $102,600.00 to Econolite Control Products, Inc., June 19, 2013 Page 2 While both phases are required to implement the first stage of the software upgrade, staff will finalize the agreement for the next phase and present it to the City Council in Fiscal Year 2013/2014 for consideration. The contracts for both phases will be coordinated to ensure that a complete and operational system is purchased for the first stage of implementation. Respectfully submitted, Mark A. Steuer Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS/CC:Is P112 cr.4STAFF REPORT tie I ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT LJ Date: June 19, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services Department By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 18744, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SR- 210 FREEWAY WEST BOUND OFF RAMP AT DAY CREEK BOULEVARD AND WEST SIDE OF STABLE FALLS AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Final Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract 18744 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreements and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18744, located on the north side of SR-210 Freeway west bound off ramp at Day Creek Boulevard and the west side of Stable Falls Avenue, in the Low Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 24, 2010. This project is for a residential subdivision of 30 single family lots on 8.85 acres of land. The Developer, Lennar Homes of California, Inc., is submitting an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $ 278,900.00 Labor and Material Bond $ 278,900.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 4,210.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's . Office. Respectfully submitted, Ma Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P113 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Vicinity Map WILSON AVENUE J W Z W Q a ci Z 3 J > S> SUMMIT AVENUE BANYAN U U VINTAGE Z Q o DRIVE ktrt PROJECT 1, 4e SITE o ' AVENUE NIROUTE 210 FREEWAY N A W -O-- E r s Item: reet cT /8714 Title: WCiN/T Y MAP P114 RESOLUTION NO. 13-085 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 18744 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 18744, submitted by Lennar Homes of California, Inc. and consisting of a subdivision of 8.85 acres of land into 30 single family lots, located on the north side of SR-210 Freeway west bound off ramp and the west side of Stable Falls Avenue, was approved by the Planning Commission on February 24, 2010; and WHEREAS, Tract Map 18744 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the installation of public street improvements by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Lennar Homes of California, Inc., as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and that said Tract Map 18744 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. 13-085— Page 1 P115 • RESOLUTION NO. 13-086 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) FOR TRACT 18744 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. 13-086 — Page 1 P116 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and.approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. RESOLUTION NO. 13-086 — Page 2 P117 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL NO. 1: (APNS 225-161-32, 33 AND 34) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. EXCEPTING THERE FROM ANY PORTION OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NO. 14082-1 IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED APRIL 20, 2001, INSTRUMENT NO. 20010147797, OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL NO. 2: (APN 225-161-19) THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST '/ OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. EXCEPTING THERE FROM ANY PORTION OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NO. 14082-1 IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED APRIL 20, 2001, INSTRUMENT NO. 20010147797, OFFICIAL RECORDS. RESOLUTION NO. 13-086 — Page 3 P118 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "Maintenance District") represents landscape sites throughout the Etiwanda North Area. The various sites maintained by the district consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, community trails and Etiwanda Creek Park. Proposed Additions to the Improvements for Project Tract 18744: 72 EACH - STREET TREES RESOLUTION NO. 13-086 — Page 4 P119 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year2012/2013 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) for Tract 18744: EDU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EDU* Single Family Parcel 1.00 $307.05 Multi-Family Parcel 1.00 307.05 Commercial/ Industrial Acre 2.00 307.05 Vacant Acre 0.25 307.05 *EDU means Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 30 Parcels x 1 EDU Factor x $307.05 Rate Per EDU = $ 9,211.50 Annual Assessment RESOLUTION NO. 13-086— Page 5 P120 RESOLUTION NO. 13-087 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR TRACT 18744 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. 13-087 — Page 1 P121 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all • assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. RESOLUTION NO. 13-087 — Page 2 P122 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION The legal description of the Property is: PARCEL NO. 1: (APNS 225-161-32, 33 AND 34) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. EXCEPTING THERE FROM ANY PORTION OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NO. 14082-1 IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED APRIL 20, 2001, INSTRUMENT NO. 20010147797, OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL NO. 2: (APN 225-161-19) THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. EXCEPTING THERE FROM ANY PORTION OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NO. 14082-1 IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED APRIL 20, 2001, INSTRUMENT NO. 20010147797, OFFICIAL RECORDS. RESOLUTION NO. 13-087 — Page 3 • P123 • Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Tract 18744: 0 EACH STREET LIGHTS RESOLUTION NO. 13-087 — Page 4 P124 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for Tract 18744: EDU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor• EDU* Single Family Parcel 1.00 $17.77_ Multi-Family Parcel 1.00 17.77 Commercial Acre 2.00 17.77 Vacant Acre 2.00 17.77 "EDU means Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 30 Parcels x 1 EDU Factor x $17.77 Rate Per EDU = $ 533.10 Annual Assessment • RESOLUTION NO. 13-087 — Page 5 P125 RESOLUTION NO. 13-088 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) FOR TRACT 18744 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. 13-088 — Page 1 P126 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. RESOLUTION NO. 13-088 — Page 2 P127 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: PARCEL NO. 1: (APNS 225-161-32, 33 AND 34) THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 AND THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. EXCEPTING THERE FROM ANY PORTION OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NO. 14082-1 IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED APRIL 20, 2001, INSTRUMENT NO. 20010147797, OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL NO. 2: (APN 225-161-19) THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. EXCEPTING THERE FROM ANY PORTION OF SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL NO. 14082-1 IN THE FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED APRIL 20, 2001, INSTRUMENT NO. 20010147797, OFFICIAL RECORDS. RESOLUTION NO. 13-088 — Page 3 P128 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local • streets in what is termed the North Etiwanda area of the City. Generally, this area encompasses the area of the City east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue within the incorporated area of the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the North Etiwanda area. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Tract 18744: STREET LIGHTS: 9 EACH EXISTING STREET LIGHTS: 2 EACH (STABLE FALLS AVENUE) RESOLUTION NO. 13-088— Page 4 P129 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) for Tract 18744: EDU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EDU* Single Family Unit 1.00 $33.32 Multi-Family Unit 1.00 33.32 Commercial/ Industrial Acre 2.00 33.32 Vacant Acre 2.00 33.32 *EDU means Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 30 Parcels x 1 EDU Factor x $33.32 Rate Per EDU = $ 999.60 Annual Assessment RESOLUTION NO. 13-088— Page 5 P130 STAFF REPORT : tett ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 19, 2013 ~J RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services Department By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer Subject: APPROVAL OF MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4-R AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR TRACT 18856, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CHURCH STREET BETWEEN MAYTEN AVENUE AND MALAGA DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving the Final Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, Monumentation Cash Deposit and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract 18856 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreements and authorizing the City Clerk to cause said map to record. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18856, located on the south side of Church Street between Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive, in the Medium High Development District (14-24 Dwellings Units per acre) of the Terra Vista Community Plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on November 28, 2012. This project is for the development of a 306-unit rental condominium on 19.25 acres of land. The Developer, Homecoming V at Terra Vista, LLC, is submitting an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond $ 280,800.00 Labor and Material Bond $ 280,800.00 Monumentation Cash Deposit $ 2,673.00 Copies of the agreement and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the Developer are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, aueh Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer P131 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Division Vicinity Map nI 0 BASE LINE ROAD BASE LINE ROAD o o 1 49 FAAY O /4P a0 J Z % c Zit% est •011111;1'1611111 iii a c sec8 011 �II1il i i DRtyE 0 Ii �11�1 X11' 1 tl I h�in�l �Ii 1�1)�11141 i1�1I I I i!!111 I IMP.!: F4 S 11I a!, i I�I!!III,I�I 111111,!l!,11, 1 r'l ti FOOTHILL l ,� BOULEVARD] FOOTHILL [ II II II N W - .-- E I s Item: 7 PACT lasso Title: V/C/N/TY MAP P132 RESOLUTION NO. 13-089 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINAL MAP, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND MONUMENTATION CASH DEPOSIT FOR TRACT 18856 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 18856, submitted by Homecoming V at Terra Vista, LLC, and consisting of a subdivision of 19.25 acres of land into a 306-unit rental condominium, located on the south side of Church Street between Mayten Avenue and Malaga Drive,was approved by the Planning Commission on November 28, 2012; and WHEREAS, Tract Map 18856 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on the Tentative Tract Map; and WHEREAS, all the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the installation of public street improvements by the City Council of said City have now been met by posting the Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Homecoming V at Terra Vista, LLC, as developer; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and that said Tract Map 18856 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. RESOLUTION NO. 13-089— Page 1 P133 RESOLUTION NO. 13-090 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4-R (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) FOR TRACT 18856 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. 13-090 — Page 1 P134 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the • proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. RESOLUTION NO. 13-090 — Page 2 P135 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY The legal description of the Property is: Parcel 12 of Parcel Map No. 14022, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, as shown by Map on file in book 180 pages 19 to 22, inclusive of Parcel Maps, Records of San Bernardino County, California, and as amended by Certificate of Correction recorded February 4, 1997 as Instrument No. 97-040160, of Official Records. Excepting there from all oil, gas, minerals, hydrocarbon and kindred substances lying below a depth of 500 feet, but without the right of surface entry as conveyed to Western Supply Corp., by grant deed recorded September 17, 1979 in book 9772 page 1262, of Official Records. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0227-151-49 and 98 0227-151-50 RESOLUTION NO. 13-090 — Page 3 P136 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community): Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "Maintenance District") represents paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the Terra Vista Planned Community. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, dedicated public easements and parks which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including those within the parks and paseos, includes but is not limited to, skating, restroom, picnic and playground facility maintenance, fence repair and replacement, and irrigation and lighting systems control, adjustment, repair and replacement and sport field maintenance. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and in a safe, healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. The parks consist of Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Tract 18856: STREET TREES: 78 Each RESOLUTION NO. 13-090 — Page 4 • P137 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community): The rate per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) is $380.00 for the fiscal year 2012/2013. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) for Tract 18856: EDU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EDU* Single Family Parcel 1.00 $380.00 Condominium Unit 0.80 380.00 Multi-Family Unit 0.70 380.00 Commercial/ Industrial Acre 3.25 380.00 Vacant Acre 0.25 380.00 School Acre 0.25 380.00 *EDU means Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 306 Units x 0.80 EDU Factor x $380.00 Rate Per EDU = $ 93,024.00 Annual Assessment *Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2011/12, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Los Angeles-Riverside-Orange County area. RESOLUTION NO. 13-090— Page 5 P138 RESOLUTION NO. 13-091 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR TRACT 18856 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. 13-091 — Page 1 P139 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. RESOLUTION NO. 13-091 — Page 2 P140 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY The legal description of the Property is: Parcel 12 of Parcel Map No. 14022, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, as shown by Map on file in book 180 pages 19 to 22, inclusive of Parcel Maps, Records of San Bernardino County, California, and as amended by Certificate of Correction recorded February 4, 1997 as Instrument No. 97-040160, of Official Records. Excepting there from all oil, gas, minerals, hydrocarbon and kindred substances lying below a depth of 500 feet, but without the right of surface entry as conveyed to Western Supply Corp., by grant deed recorded September 17, 1979 in book 9772 page 1262, of Official Records. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0227-151-49 and 98 0227-151-50 • RESOLUTION NO. 13-091 — Page 3 P141 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Tract 18856: STREET LIGHTS on CHURCH STREET (Existing): 5 Each RESOLUTION NO. 13-091 — Page 4 P142 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for Tract 18856: EDU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EDU* Single Family Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi-Family Parcel 1.00 17.77 Commercial Acre 2.00 17.77 Vacant Acre 2.00 17.77 *EDU means Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 306 Units x 1 EDU Factor x $17.77 Rate Per EDU = $ 5,437.62 Annual Assessment RESOLUTION NO. 13-091 — Page 5 P143 RESOLUTION NO. 13-092 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) FOR TRACT 18856 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. 13-092 — Page 1 P144 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. RESOLUTION NO. 13-092 — Page 2 P145 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: HOMECOMING VAT TERRA VISTA, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY The legal description of the Property is: Parcel 12 of Parcel Map No. 14022, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, as shown by Map on file in book 180 pages 19 to 22, inclusive of Parcel Maps, Records of San Bernardino County, California, and as amended by Certificate of Correction recorded February 4, 1997 as Instrument No. 97-040160, of Official Records. Excepting there from all oil, gas, minerals, hydrocarbon and kindred substances lying below a depth of 500 feet, but without the right of surface entry as conveyed to Western Supply Corp., by grant deed recorded September 17, 1979 in book 9772 page 1262, of Official Records. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 0227-151-49 and 98 0227-151-50 RESOLUTION NO. 13-092 — Page 3 P146 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community): Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City east of Haven Avenue, south of Base Line Road, north of Foothill Boulevard and west of Rochester Avenue. The sites maintained by the District consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Tract 18856: STREET LIGHTS (Existing) on MALAGA DRIVE: 4 Each STREET LIGHTS (Existing) on MAYTEN AVENUE: 3 Each • RESOLUTION NO. 13-092 — Page 4 P147 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2012/2013 Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) for Tract 18856: EDU Rate per Land Use Basis Factor* EDU* Single Family Parcel 1.00 $28.96 Multi-Family Unit 0.50 28.96 Commercial Acre 2.00 28.96 Vacant Acre 2.00 28.96 *EDU means Equivalent Dwelling Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 306 Units x 0.50 EDU Factor x $28.96 Rate Per EDU = $4,430.88 Annual Assessment RESOLUTION NO. 13-092 — Page 5 P148 STAFF REPORT h• PLANNING DEPARTMENT LAS. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Date: June 19, 2013 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Thomas Grahn, Associate Planner Subject: RATIFY RESOLUTION NO. 13-093 FOR THE EMERGENCY ACQUISITION OF MATERIALS AND CONTRACT LABOR FORCES NECESSARY TO EFFECT THE REQUIRED ROOFING REPAIRS TO THE ETIWANDA PACIFIC ELECTRIC DEPOT IN THE AMOUNT OF $102,654 AND TO APPROPRIATE $102,654 FROM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS ACCOUNT NUMBER 12043145650-1389. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council ratify Resolution No. 13-093 for the emergency acquisition of materials and contract labor forces necessary to effect the required roofing repairs to the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot in the amount of $102,654 and to appropriate $102,654 from Community Development Block Grant Funds account number 12043145650-1389. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: In July 2011, the City of Rancho Cucamonga took possession of the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Depot located at 7087 Etiwanda Avenue, with the intention of performing a full restoration of this important historic resource. Between July 2011 and June 2012, staff began preparing plans for the restoration of this historic structure; however, due to funding limitations this work was not implemented. During an October 12, 2012 site inspection of the Depot, visible ceiling damage was observed where portions of the plaster had fallen to the floor. A January 10, 2013 site inspection evidenced further ceiling damage where additional plaster had fallen from the ceiling and a public safety/hazardous condition was found as a direct result of a leaking and deteriorating roof. The existing flat roof on the depot is over 30 years old and is rapidly deteriorating. Portions of the plaster ceiling on the interior of the Depot have been heavily damaged by ongoing roof leaks and are in danger of collapsing. A smaller red clay tile roof on the south side of the building, visible from the Pacific Electric Trail, has been stripped of its tiles and is also rapidly deteriorating. Additionally, there is structural damage in the concrete parapet wall adjacent to the roof and in the wooden roof framing. The Depot is in need of immediate repairs to prevent further damage and there is imminent danger that the interior ceiling could deteriorate further and possibly collapse if the repairs are not made. After the last rain event, staff reevaluated the depot ceiling and determined that it was necessary to complete the repair as a substantial amount of water leaked through the roof. P149 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ETIWANDA PACIFIC ELECTRIC DEPOT EMERGENCY REPAIR June 19, 2013 Page 2 The identified repairs include: • Remove the existing flat roof down to its structural framing. Remove the roofing material of the shed roof. Remove debris in the attic, primarily old wiring. • Install new historic reproduction clay barrel tile on the shed roof facing the Pacific Electric Trail. Install a new seamless white flat roof on the Depot building. Repair/replicate the historic metal downspouts and gutter. Repair and resheath the wooden elements of the two roofs and repair structural timber damage in framing. Insulate both new roofs. • Concrete the parapet, repair decorative pylons and chimney. Infill one interior concrete wall to repair a large hole cut in the structure. Patch exterior of parapet wall where new red clay tile roofing will be installed. • Historic preservation consultant, continuous on-site observations of contractors. Compliance of the work to be completed to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation. Due to the emergency situation requiring immediate action, there was insufficient time to follow the bidding procedures normally required for public contracts. In order to minimize the hazardous condition and prevent further deterioration of this historic resource the City must provide for the emergency acquisition of materials and contract labor forces necessary to effect the required roofing repairs to the Etiwanda Pacific Electric Trail Depot. Respectfully submitted, Candyce ett Planning Manager CB:TG/Is P15O RESOLUTION NO. 13-093 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE EMERGENCY PROCUREMENT OF MATERIALS AND LABOR WITHOUT COMPETITIVE BIDDING A. Recitals. (i) Chapter 3.08 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, and California Public Contract Code § 20162, generally require contracts for the procurement of goods and/or services in excess of the City's established purchasing limits, and contracts for public works in excess of the statutory amount, respectively, to be competitively bid. (ii) Said Chapter, and Public Contract Code § 20168, permit such bidding to be dispensed with when the City Council determines by passing a resolution by four-fifths vote that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health or property. (iii) During an October 12, 2012 site inspection of the Depot visible ceiling damage was observed where portions of the plaster had fallen to the floor. A January 10, 2013 site inspection evidenced further ceiling damage where additional plaster had fallen from the ceiling and a public safety/hazardous condition was found as a direct result of a leaking and deteriorating roof. Because emergency action was necessary to avoid injury, it was not possible to conduct competitive public bidding for the procurement of the necessary materials and labor. (iv) It is the intent of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in adopting this Resolution to ratify and approve the emergency expenditure of funds and emergency repairs, without competitive bidding, as described in Recital (iii). (v) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and resolves as follows: 1. All of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The City Council hereby expressly finds that as a direct result of the deteriorated roofing condition discovered on October 12, 2012 and January 10, 2013, emergency circumstances were created that necessitated the procurement of materials, and repair and reconstruction activities, without competitive bidding. 3. Based upon the foregoing findings, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby ratifies and approves the emergency expenditure of funds and procurement of materials, and repair and reconstruction activities, without competitive bidding, as described in Recital (iii). P151 4. In accordance with the provisions of Public Contract Code § 22050, the City Manager is hereby directed to report the status of this matter relating to repairs, any continued risks to the public health, and whether it will be necessary to make further expenditures without competitive bidding, to the City Council at its next regular meeting, and thereafter until all such risks no longer exist. The City Council shall comply with the approval procedures set forth in that Section in the event it determines that further emergency expenditures are required. 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 19th day of June, 2013, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk �P152 STAFF REPORT 2_2 j COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 19, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE CENTRAL PARK CARPETING PROJECT AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT FOR THE BASE BID PLUS BID ADDITIVES 2 THROUGH 5, IN THE AMOUNT OF $91,101.17, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, G&S CARPET MILLS, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 3890.00, FROM ACCOUNT NO. 1025001-5602. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award the Base Bid plus Bid Additives 2 through 5, for the Central Park Carpeting Project, and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $91,101.17, to the lowest responsive bidder, G&S Carpet Mills and authorize the expenditure of a contingency, in the amount of $3890.00, from Account No.1025001-5602. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 4, 2013, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate was $93,573.00, excluding the office areas. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of this contract will provide for the removal of existing carpeting and purchase and installation of new carpet tiles through the Central Park Community Center, excluding the office areas. The contract documents call for forty-five (45) working days to purchase and install the carpet material. Although most work is planned to occur during normal Community Center operating'hours, a portion of the work may have to occur during closure hours between 9pm and 7am. Respectfully submitted, Nettie Nielsen Community Services Director Attachments • P153 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING JUNE 4,2013 APPARENT LOW BIDDER Central Park Carpeting Project ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE G865 Carpet Mills Inc. Item Qty DESCRIPTION UNIT Qty SID No SY BASE BID Circulation Areas AMOUNT COST SY AMOUNT 1 932 Total Field Color C-1 $36.90/SY $34,390.80 $43.57 943 $41,086.51 2 Accent Color C-2 $43.69 I 177 $7,733.13 3 Accent Color C-3 $43.69 298 $13,019.62 4 Accent Color C-4 $43.69 28 $1,223.32 5 Accent Color C-5 $43.69 48 $2,097.12 600 TOTAL ACCENT COLOR $53.70/SY $32,220.00 551 $24,073.19 TOTAL BASE BID FIELD COLOR $34,390.80 $41,086.51 TOTAL BASE BID ACCENT COLOR $32,220.00 $24,073.19 GRAND TOTAL BASE BID $66,610.80 $65,159.70 - BID ALTERNATE 1 Office Area A1.1 343 Total Field Color C-1 $36.90/SY $12,657.00 $36.78 330 $12,137.40 A1.2 Accent Color C-2 A1.3 Accent Color C-3 $36.78 60 $2,206.80 AI.4 Accent Color C-4 A1.5 Accent Color C-5 52 TOTAL ACCENT COLOR $53.70/SY $2,793.00 60 $2,206.80 TOTAL BID ALTERNATE 1 FIELD COLOR $12,288.00 I $12,137.40 TOTAL BID ALTERNATE 1 ACCENT COLOR $2,793.00 $2,206.80 RID AL I BBB I 2 Meeting Rooms 139/140 1- A2.1 142 Total Field Color C-1 I $3690/57 I 55,240.001 $47.34 I 140 $6,627.60 A2.2 Accent Color C-2 _ A2.3 Accent Color C-3 $47.34 r 22 $1,041.48 A2.4 Accent Color C-4 $47,34 5.33 $252.32 A2.5 Accent Color C-5 $47.34 5.33 $252.32 28 TOTAL ACCENT COLOR $53.70/SY $1,504.00 I 32.66 I $1,546.12 TOTAL BID ALTERNATE 2 FIELD COLOR $5,240.00 $6,627.60 TOTAL BID ALTERNATE 2 ACCENT COLOR $1,504.00 $1,546.12 BID ALTERNATE 3 Meeting Room 114 A3.1 83 Total Field Color C-1 $36.90 $3,063.00 $46.17 I 80 $3,693.60 A3.2 Z TtColor C-2 I _ A3.3 Accent Color C-3 $46.17 16 $738.72 A3.4 Accent Color C-4 $46.17 I 5.33 I $246.09 A3.5 Accent Color C-5 $46.17 5.33 I $246.09 17 TOTAL ACCENT COLOR $53.70 • $913.00 I 26.66 -$1,230.89 TOTAL BID ALTERNATE 3 FIELD COLOR $3,063.00 $3,693.60 TOTAL BID ALTERNATE 3 ACCENT COLOR $913.00 $1,230.89 BID ALTERNATE 4 Internet Room A TV Room A4.1 101 Total Field Color C-1 I $36.90/SY 1 $3,727.001 $40.85 100 $4,085.00 A4.2 Accent Color C-2 A4.3 Accent Color C-3 $40.85 15 $612.75 A4.4 Accent Color C-4 A4.5 Accent Color C-5 14 TOTAL ACCENT COLOR $53.70/SY $752.00 15 TOTAL BID ALTERNATE 4 FIELD COLOR $3,727.00 $4,085.00 TOTAL BID ALTERNATE 4 ACCENT COLOR $752.00 $612.75 BID ALTERNATE 5 Pool Room A5.1 139 Total Field Color C-1 $3690/57 $5,129.00 $45.17 I 130 I $5,872.10 A5.2 Accent Color C-2 I A5.3 Accent Color C-3 $45.17 45 $2,032.65 A5.4 Accent Color C-4 $45.17 5.33 I $240.76 A5.5 Accent Color C-5 47 TOTAL ACCENT COLOR $53.70/SY $2,524.00 50.33 I $2,273.41 TOTAL BID ALTERNATE 5 FIELD COLOR $5,129.00 $5,872.10 TOTAL BID ALTERNATE 5 ACCENT COLOR $2,524.00 $2,273.41 1 7.-1\ai% P154 STAFF REPORT CONINIUNI Y SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: June 19, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: Karen McGuire-Emery, Senior Park Planner Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED FOR THE CENTRAL PARK PAVILION PROJECT AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT FOR THE BASE BID AND BID ADDITIVES 1 THROUGH 4, IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 251,998.00, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, AToM ENGINEERING, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 7% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,640.00,; $220,365.00 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 120401-5650/1834120-0, AND $49,273.00 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 120401-5650/1803120-0 (PARK DEVELOPMENT). RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received for the Central Park Pavilion Project and award and authorize the execution of a contract for the Base Bid and Bid Additives 1 through 4, in the amount of $251,998.00, to the lowest responsive bidder, AToM Engineering, and authorize the expenditure of a 7% contingency in the amount of $17,640.00; $220,365.00, from Account No. 120401-5650/1834120-0, and $49,273.00 from Account No. 120401-5650/1803120-0 (Park Development). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on June 4, 2013, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the Base Bid was $ 266,541.25. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of this contract will provide for the purchase and installation of a large picnic shelter, as well as landscape and irrigation modifications, as part of the Base Bid. In addition, due to the competitive price provided by the low bidder on the base bid, Bid Additives are also able to be awarded, and will provide infrastructure for a future drinking fountain, as well as electrical service for the pavilion. The contract documents call for seventy (70) working days to purchase and install the structure. A portion of the funds for the development of this project were provided through a grant from the County of San Bernardino to allow the City to provide this picnic facility for the community. Respectfully submitted, Nettie Nielsen Community Services Director Attachments • P155 it N N o 0 v3f °O 0 N a °O o 00 o 00 0 00 0 0 oo o 0 0 co o .n. 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 W O m co o C �n in N 0 O 0 N of N V •Y 3^ N h C W ... R O 4) O ° nr ...I 49 .+ .n .fir n n O y 63 d3 Ni 69 69 (9 N H N 69 N N fR 0 U — V C‘l< O N 0 0 ° O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 ✓ W o 0 0 ° of 00 00 00 0) o m U, N ry .• 0 U, w 0 .F. o � vi a CO .'". 0 o o n n B. 4i▪ 69 49 4) 0 44 69 N co - e is 0 0 F' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 z . 0 o 0 1d� ° o d S u Q^~ °o o h ° ° o °o °o O 0 0 0 0 °° 0 0 0 0 t Na° O n V_ O a o o b 0; O N 0 0 tt n" l: 0 °� 00 y 69 Ui OK 4:.1 63 OK H - N U] N Hi N (9 H 41 N 6i M ° 0 0 O O o 0 ° 0 O O O O O 0 F Fy ° o 0 6 0. • 0 0 ° o 0 0 0 °yQ O O p O 0 0 ° 0 O o 0. o U ° ° o a n 0. ,°`, 0 0- 0 N .. CO• 4? 43 69 y 41 4) 41 vs A 4) 49 W F o o 0 o O °0 0 0 0 ° 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 W S CI orQ O Oi o O O O 0 y0 j O O o O O o m 151{G ° M _ N O N y 0 `O 10 N N 3 4 0 or) .�. e p w. .�. 69 a 69 a 6 y O 0 O Hi 43 ii ta Fy 4i M Ny M N l=ll N O O ° O 0 0 00 0 --_ 0 --- 0 --_ 0 0 K 0 0 N y O co; 30 O p O O O 0 O 6 6 0. .4 0 iC 0 o a 0 o ° o n - 0 '°0_ vii. Lri 0;Q.¢ 4°, 69 64 4) 64 VI 43 4i 4, 49 49 4, N . hl E. n N o0 0 0 o c F A °o °o °0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Z. p d o oe o o gp P m N 3 O F < _ _ 4. d w w w w w w 0 - 'A w w w w 4') N w w G w 41 N o o ° 30 ° $kR0 _ P 00 k0 U w '^ w 4' w u w o w w w w y w Li n v u N a ° U • a o al O m $'> « d o c o 0 p op O o o r O A «° °' 00 m -� 00, W c uEa.50 3 yR 00oa 300 N v uo c .5 mh 1.1 ^' GC v 3 u m o .co ; o .� 8 ` O 0uj'p ..g o '$ e Oa� in" y .� o5y �<G Oz 'o ,o p ,o Yq° a44 a. a a a z z m e ° . A 4' .,- ,.m ,o_ G a� L d -F, . 0 . 1 .- . M • d .J n ti U y V m $ '� t:Yl °' •P, F m p tr1 a° m u m 7 m 3 p m m S 0 a?sec w m �np N. 00 c 3k .cMo O q 1" – ° a37 S .E 5 5 F 0 '5?p c cO. "a `Q a o ' 2E O0° - F ❑ c E w 5.v°_, a.p o, ro'o c m025 cocoa W5a h °- 0E 0. .5 03 F F 3a F t F yo G ., ° z W p E 5 Doc.) ,... ----. 0- 5 C o N v7 < 0 a 5 6'o °d &.y o .S 5 m poo,C o c ¢ G o v. of m 0 p a �o E 0 l " 0 ". c.y < s aoo O °mmOm� G F mG .Namroa_i O ❑ DEarou 0' O 7 4❑ 5 0 0 E 0.. o o E _ F: 'p „ F a P o p o0 .1 p m a g F m 5, a p m 0 F F m. 0) ° o f c m 0...d.,, v p z m z `� c d N o:c ¢ " « ¢ y'� M O 5 N 5 G o '¢� n fi g y c c o '� h d �..`. c a n 0. E500 2, ti c 'Sco m `� _ ° V 'C v O E ' mo w a yod° 0 ❑ Ea o5 .5 'b N 5 0 9 3 `� 0 `5 cmV ui c > ° a > E ca 83 a � .5 > o _ 0 P. E � c > > , } SvFax `1 .o 0 3 m t e j 5 ° ° y a Eli " y F [.. o? o .� 5 " V > « m $ w RRi .0 v m F [z -" �` r m 5 F a ^ oa o Oc P. m t r 3 8. C.c.S ,o i m 5 � o a c� O ❑ m .o ❑ ❑ .S V c c E a o 0 O ti°' c E a o °' 0 0 o 0, c.c W o d ro m . c'0 5 0 ,e E . O O c « `3y o p 5. ❑ 'Z o > E Fr' x w 0 4 d'w h= m a` a o. 3 E w up -o 3 � ❑Q c a ¢ ¢ r 6'. .� < � �' S .S � � � a m � c« � m O 0 'n o o N t'I O V) 0 N CO 0' Z ¢ Q Q ¢ P156 • o ° O mt.. O o O o 0 0 0 o O o O o g o u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 g o U J ° o 0 0 o O O o Q O 0 O 0 O 0 O i' trO o O O O 0 o o ° O o N N CI 0 o o 0 °O 8 0 k W y N 0 V Cl o N C N O 6 N N N G U 9 V M C (4 P ('l W CJ 0 Cl N M M < N f N e 99• u N N . ——— —_— e N ° 0 0 ° z 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • o 0 0 o 6 0 0 0 ° 6 O o ° d 0 ° ° ° ° °o o o ° °0 0 0 ot 0 '• RN' 69 <A 69 69 69 » Cl Gay M» °K Cl Cl N L F o 0 0 ° 0 0 0 ° O o 0 0 8 ° 0 � aria o ° u O O N N p 8o o 9 O O ° O O O u y ° O N j '0 0 gg U A M 9 o . n N n 4. 2 iN 0, N 69 6 69 N `c C ___ -- __— __ — U• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z o 0 0 0 0 w o O o p 0 o�0 O o o O O O o ( N n U ° ,y o 0 n 0 m < a o h 2 ut 9 H W N C �' M » w yj R W 01 o O u F 0 0 0 o o O o O o 0 0 b ,E1 b4 0 ° ° O H o 1.6 O O O a ° 0 o O O n O^ Cl Cl G 01 0 v o O ro c -, aN� O ° 0 Cl N 2 1 — o- b - c C• h 0 n r O o- to to L d3 M M M ! 4 9 4' ( H y y ^ ti 69 49 v. -- __ N 0 0 0 0 CO O 00 0 0 0 0 0 O 00 o O 0 0 o O,N 0 •N N •'o O N• 0 0 6 O nno 0 R 0 ,°c Po ° m O , m r? 0 v `0 Cl 0U 0 9 0 ro - �+ c 2 n o 'K e9 n N w 69 69 4 61 y w 69 .n a o O 0 R v d e c•2 • N P Q N n P d 3i H h h w - w H r w w ✓ O G N v. U w w ~ 0 0 0 0 0 s �y a - 9 w '0 s - h ° ^ w w ^ U '0 44 N N µ O ', u C N c 0 .n V 'o o f0 O c =..0 .. o Y o O o f o I c O o 3 o ro O c o° . n y ,., o c N `.O'S E 3 30 ym0�� ,y _ t c 3 0 v -.1141) °1 • o u v ` _ x c < o u F o o jE o y F o m c r 0 F O a a E 0.¢F L Lz c c ° E = a G y o+ y g ,Dtj O .- v z O El.v v o a R Z r m.� � i z r m L °a u C c t o < W E K .2 o f 0 o u o a : - o `° 0 0 m O ° 5 g 0 0 + °y U c - f.] :-' F ,- R n W m E m e K- m u d O c' g" F - '! : 7 m o = F A 3 t t K o O - c F - m F v - a d o. U ,°.ro 9. n o a,.5 >. 0 � p` rn� o � F F. ; < - H ara c2.'oa , E. Um cetm 'o. td vo 0E � 'z O. E ° 3 0'. F F 3 $" F' n v - E' m E . o m E mac:'a U c '` °- �' < s ' < c.V o = 5 9^ 5''5 < 5 m _ to- c < c o m m z Oy oc c - e z o z O m 5 z g m a ° z .� °< 5 c LEER .`.' g .? x E. K aot > c s E F x 5EY ^ F - c nc,eF z o = m o_ c ° c c m c ° m c-n = m 9 ° 5495 ,5 m o o E 3 F O m i p°r E E E m ,°. j E x _ '7 E F F o g4 .3. ..6 . - EE.., F .. jd c c F t c c o C a O o`° V 0 Z' L Z G t t ' °t /�_3 G < ^''u k o ° m c c o < m au m C E o <..a a G' ,t.R C . t 0 ' P )C c 0 u p' — co e . °u-`. r., E c a eG o m E o a-° E u o° y.e 05 O d �.� a `oE 3.um.b 83 v ,938 . a rm 'w 0`", F [. � ,17012 ° ° 95 [- [: 9 'c 5E9_ � FL O'°u ,`o^� o Ur ° 38.F ^ cv a. ta me . U'S o 0._ O. _ ° c � > c w 3 • 'E Ua ° ° E rLo' a° °°u � cac CC u2 C C `5 cE ..-o 0oU cEn ° C- 0U u., c[ y1 0 u u R y R O ` O C C C C ° y u V L y p p > y O C C C > E H t a a t7 %nF O 0lda a.3 rao s � 3c < < in. ¢ < :. u. .. .5 O Q > u... E . _ < < = c. c.. e 0 Y - - - .. .. .. to 0' Z ^ N CI V to b n CO 0 ¢ ¢ < <CO • P157 STAFF REPORT = ,,yam COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT L- -40 Date: June 19, 2013 RANCHO C,UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: Karen Silhanek, Management Analyst I c� Subject: APPROVAL OF A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGARDING PROPOSED FEE MODIFICATIONS FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND FACILITIES OPERATED BY THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a recommendation from the Park and Recreation Commission pertaining to proposed annual fee modifications for program activities and facilities operated by the Community Services Department. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On an annual basis, the Community Services Department analyzes Department fees and charges and recommends modifications to the Fees and Charges Schedule to reflect identified needs from the previous year. As a part of this process, the Department presents the proposed modified fee schedule to the Park and Recreation Commission for their review and modification as deemed appropriate. The Commission then forwards its recommendations to the City Council for their consideration. This year's fee revisions continue to work towards streamlining and organizing the presentation of information into an applicant/staff user-friendly format. With this goal in mind: • Clarifying language has been added to the Facility User Group Classification Chart. • Staff is removing the pages titled City Indoor Facility Usage Policy. These pages refer to policy not fees and are included in our policy manual. • New categories have been added to City Staff Fees. For rentals at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center we have added the option to schedule City staff acting as Event Manager for the day of the rental event. For rentals on the Lewis Family Playhouse stage we have added the option to schedule City staff acting as Stage Manager and the option to schedule Theatre Technician III staff. And we have added the option to schedule Facility Maintenance staff from the Public Works Department if needed. P158 REVIEW OF PROPOSED FEE MODIFICATIONS FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND FACILITIES OPERATED BY THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT JUNE 19, 2013 PAGE 2 • A 5% discount is being recommended for rentals at Central Park's Event Halls for bookings of 12 hours or more per occurrence. • Minor increases (approximately 5%) have been added to the rental rates for Groups 2, 3 and 4 for rentals at Lions Center East, Lions Center West, RC Family Resource Center and RC Family Sports Center's Courts and Rooms on pages 9 & 10. • Minor additions have been added to the list of Indoor Facility Equipment Use Fees at the Cultural Center to better reflect the equipment that the public is currently requesting be available for rent. • We are currently not providing the Fun on the Run program therefore; we will not be renting the vehicle or providing programming to the public. • Picnic Shelter Fees are being recommended to be increased this year to keep the City's rates comparable to surrounding cities. Suggested fee increase is $1.00 for each Group's rate. • The fees for the City's Special Event Areas continue to be refined based upon historical use. Fees are being recommended to be increased for the Pacific Electric Trail Staging Area. Clarification language is added to both Red Hill and Heritage Community Parks. Fees for the New Pavilion will be added by September. • Clarification language has been added and the fees for the Park Sports Field Rentals are being recommended to increase approximately 5% for the Softball and Soccer fields as well as the fee for rental of City-owned storage areas. • Clarification language has been added to the Neighborhood and Community Park Lighted Sports Venue Fees. • The City is not renting out City owned snack bars at this time and this fee has been eliminated. • Outdoor Park Facility Permit for Businesses has been deleted until the Community Services Department has a written policy in place. • Minor increases are being recommended to be added to the table for Epicenter Community Sports Fields Rental. Increase is approximately 5% for rental of the Sports Fields. It is noted that the Stadium is now known as LoanMart Field at the Epicenter. • Modifications were made to the Non-Resident Fees to include programs not currently being charged and to set a lower rate for shorter session senior classes. • Staff is recommending an increase in the Senior Transportation Program's annual user fee from $25.00 to $27.00. This fee has not been increased since put into practice. P159 REVIEW OF PROPOSED FEE MODIFICATIONS FOR PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND FACILITIES OPERATED BY THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT JUNE 19, 2013 PAGE 3 • Staff is recommending an increase in the Registration Fee (Equipment Replacement Fund) from $1 .00 to $2.00 per registration transaction. This fee was implemented last year to help fund the need to replace or repair furniture and equipment that is subject to heavy use by our participants. We have completed one registration session (one quarter) with this fee in place and have collected $6,400. One general note to the attached Fee Schedule is that proposed deletions to the Department's fees are noted in the attached document in black type strikeout and proposed changes/additions are noted in red type. Should the City Council approve the recommendation by the Park and Recreation Commission, it is anticipated that most new fees will take effect in July 2013, any fees that must be advertised in the Grapevine will take effect after the Winter 2014 Grapevine is printed and mailed in November 2013. Respectfully submitted, '(\(0+10 Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director Attachments t:1COMMSERV\Council&BoardslCityCouncil lStaffReports12013\Fees6.19.13.doc P160 ttiOler r 49.0 1!'t IF . IF t pi it f / its. � AL 7,4■ . facj t4k 1 ; "48 itaki0e4.97:4, e r 10 , . . 0 0 0 i 04-0‘: v; - - ,, ,. 64L4 '-r -, 41611'N .0 011 i 6-,. ,^.. o^`iiiim,-- RANCHO tom CUCAMONGA 3 "d'.11�i•is.' 7 i COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2013/2014 1 q ea FEES AND CHARGES SCHEDULE 7:4:--a,-: ,'''' PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION - t.,,,I tet#41-' RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL ON MAY 8, 2013 PROPOSED CHANGES FOR 2013/2014 •jr 4. , .illt - DRAFT TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL: 111 " i h. , �► , +• JUNE 19, 2013 01\ : A .1 ,:,i 06 ft 11111 Xi .11h. • p - 4.0“-.. a istu , r- .-iiie , , ._ .. - ) - % \'; '\%\,\ « 1 - ," t pey' P161 , .j- • Community Services Department - Draft RANCHO 2013/14 Fees and Charges Schedule CUCAMOWGA TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 - FEES FOR USE OF CITY FACILITIES FACILITY USER GROUP CLASSIFICATION CHART AND DESCRIPTION 1 INDOOR FACILITY ROOM RENTAL FEES 7 Central Park— Goldy S. Lewis Community Center 7 Central Park—James L. Brulte Senior Center 7 Civic Center Courtyard 8 Equestrian Center 8 Lions Center East 8 Lions Center West 8 RC Family Resource Center 9 RC Family Sports Center— Courts 9 RC Family Sports Center— Rooms 9 Victoria Gardens Cultural Center 10 OUTDOOR PARK FACILITY RENTAL FEES AND FEE POLICIES 12 Park Picnic Shelters 12 Red Hill Community Park Amphitheater 12 Special Event Areas 12 PARK SPORTS FIELD RENTAL FEES AND FEE POLICIES 14 General Park Sports Field Fee Policies 14 Sports Fields Rental Fees and Deposits 14 Sports Field Lighting Fees 14 Snack Bar Rental Fees and Deposits 14 Storage Rooms Fees and Deposits 14 EPICENTER RENTAL FEES AND DEPOSITS 15 Epicenter Community Sport Fields Rental Fees and Deposits 15 Epicenter Stadium Complex Facilities Rental Fees 15 Epicenter Parking Area Rental Fees 15 Epicenter Special Event Area Fees 15 Epicenter Filming Rental Fees 16 Epicenter Stadium Service Fees and Deposits 16 SECTION 2 - FEES FOR PROGRAMS AND SERVICES CITY INDOOR FACILITY USAGE PO' ICY 2 GENERAL PROGRAM FEES AND FEE POLICIES 4 P162 FACILITY USER GROUP CLASSIFICATION CHART AND DESCRIPTION GROUP Qualifying Type of Function Specifications Organization Outside Governmental Events/Functions Pfegfafils7 The following applies to Governmental agencies Agencies- RC Resident meetings or events that directly having an approved,written partnership with the City. Benefit Use— function serve the Rancho Cucamonga Group 1 (no fees)facility users are only permitted a' 1 provides a direct benefit community. the RC Family Resource Center. specified-facilities to RC Residents e#-the-organization . Group 2 rates apply for If an outside Government Agency facility use at all other locations. At facilities where requests - :_: • - •- _ -•••• ••e, — --e - facility use for a purpose that does pay-Group-2-rates- not provide a direct benefit to RC Exception for San Bernardino County users groups—will-be residents ,they limited to Group 1 (no fee) use rentals during normal will be classified as Group 3 user. operating hours of Lions Easy Lions`^' and at the RC Family Resource&pe#s Center, includes one Saturday use per month,Monday---Friday,with reservations allowed no more than 3 months in advance. other facility use providing a direct benefit to RC residents during extended operating hours or at other City facilities requested--times will be charged Group 2 rates. Non-profit civic,athletic, Events/Functions Pregrams; Compliance with City Non-Profit Eligibility Policy is social organizations, that directly required to receive Group 2 status. churches and schools serve the Rancho Cucamonga based in Rancho community 2 Cucamonga. organization. Group 2 facility rental rates are highly discounted to allow for consistent and affordable use of facilities by non-profit groups serving City residents.To insure consistency among user groups, the City cannot consider rental fee waivers by Group 2 users. Approved RC non-profit youth serving organizations are permitted one free Board meeting or membership meeting ease per month. These groups may also use one room for participant registration without charge up to two times a year prior to their season/event for up to four hours per use. These free uses are only available at Lions Community Centers or Family Sports Center as space permits. Outside Governmental Events/Functions programs that Events/I- uncii:_,i is pfegfams not directly providing a Agencies(Non-RC do NOT provide a direct benefit to direct service to the Rancho Cucamonga community; Benefit Use) RC residents. meet-Group-1 - • : •- __ _• _ •_ _ __ _ _• will be criteria: charged Group 3 rates. Resident non-profit Private events/programs that do Events/Functions programs not directly providing a organizations not meet Group 2 criteria. direct service to the Rancho Cucamonga community; -- -- - -- - -• will be charged Group 3 rates. City Residents Any approved function 3 Employee Organizations .Any approved function Political Candidates Any approved function Political Organizations Non-resident non-profit, Any approved function civic, social organizations and schools City commercial, Any approved function business and profit making organizations Non-residents Any approved function 4 Non-resident employee Any approved function organizations, commercial, business and profit making organizations and churches _ City of Rancho Events, meetings and programs No rental fees are required for City of Rancho CITY Cucamonga which are directly hosted and Cucamonga Departments for official business. _coordinated by a City Department _ Equipment requested at additional expense to CSD 1 • P163 for official business. will be recovered from the requesting Department.Ne separate City Departments Facility Use Guidelines Policy. City of Rancho Events, meetings and programs No rental fees are required for Community Services Cucamonga which are directly hosted and Department use.Any costs for additional staff or CS D Community Services coordinated by the Community equipment must be recovered from the program Department Services Department. budget. 2 P164 THIS PAGE TO BE REMOVED FROM FEE SCHEDULE CITY INDOOR FACILITY USAGE POLICY Definitions-: City - - Gommunity Activities: Cucamonga Asti�ities t#at are�lanned : -" --- - - ' - - _•. - - - - - -- - •. - . 1 East/LAfr. + Victoria-Gardens Carr I .T Family-Resource-Center Central-Pack Family-Sports-Center Ge lehration-Hall Lewis-Family Cnm'h. Playhouse . _ . • _ Playhouse-is-used for-higher-end-paying-rental exclusively--for City's premier Playhouse season Use Community-Center a rate rental r e to rehearsals-and _. . . _ • - presentations, meetings- i • - Playhouse and I ihra n. signal-Gant-meetings gs and ctivities, with professieaal programming, entertainers-and-paying rental clients. Ail-City-meetingsi 1-)-SP trainings-and by the City Council and 2) as-defined-above-are involving-staff-from-multiple Playhouse use is All-Crity-meetingsitrainings permitted-at-these agencies, in which the City of limited to season and and -as cc, as financial Allowable " and-paying-rental - •- - .. - of Eentral Rarl��Y - e-- -•. -- --• -• ' elientsenly 9ther eitYlises as-available—Group-2-rates specified-elected -- uses at the discretion of City's proportional share). the CSD Director. use one-use-per-calendar These partnership year per elected a Y- g Extended Hours use. a separate programming soheduling-agreernent, 3 P165 THIS PAGE TO BE REMOVED FROM FEE SCHEDULE - - • - • • - e 1 : C.._4Ms4 t.anili4ies4 Family-S-pocts-Conter Celebration-Hall Lewis-Family Playhouse Available-during be_s-- open -free Restrictions e�e.,a.,.ti„ra,., ked advance, uses-pea sGheduledekend fitted: No-special conditions, Neopecial-cenditions, Department-staff-bring-them Q Ally pay-for-extraordinary-staff-of In-the-event-the-requesting must-be-paid—All-facility Conditions e€Use #asility-usersmust approval--process- process:process, through-theopproval and-Glean-up-since-Re fps, 4 P166 GENERAL FEES FOR FACILTY USE Application Fee: A non-refundable application fee of $25.00 will be applied to every facility rental request, except those users that are exempt from rental fees as specified in the facility reservation policy. This fee is collected as part of the facility rental deposit and will be retained upon return of the rental deposit. Alcohol Use Fees: Alcohol Use is permitted only at appro -= - -- - - - - Central Park, Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center and the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center). Requests to serve alcohol at any program or event require a special permit An additional $500.00 Rental Deposit and a $50.°° Administration Fee will be required for alcohol use rentals. City Staff Fees: One staff person is included in the rental fees as listed during regular operating hours and additional staff may be required depending on the type of event, as determined by the Community Services Department. Additional fee for staff is required for all rentals that occur during extended hours. • $15.00 per hour for Community Services Building staff for all facilities • $20.00 per hour for Technical/Front of House/Box Office staff(at the Lewis Family Playhouse) • $40.00 per hour for T heatre Technician Ill staff • $20.00 per hour City Staff acting as Event Manager for the day of event hours only (at Victoria Gardens Cultural Center) • $25.00 per hour City Staff acting as Stage Manager for services (at Lewis Family Playhouse) • .. -.99 . .. - - - - - -- ! -- - ' -• • $80.00 per hour for Front of House Services (staff and/or volunteers) at the Lewis Family Playhouse • Facility Maintenance Staff—As determined by Public Works Services Department Rental Deposits: A Rental Deposit is charged for all rentals, except those users that are exempt from rental fees as specified in the facility reservation policy at City facilities and will be returned as long as there is no damage to the facility, no overage of time and the renter has been compliant with the rental policies of the Department. An Additional Rental Deposit may be required according to event/rental requirements and the City's risk assessment. Community Center Facility Rentals: Hourly fees are based upon weekday Operating Hours Use. An increased rate for weekend Extended Hours Use will be applied to Friday night use after 5:00 p.m. and for all use on Saturday, Sunday and open designated holidays. Rental of Central Park requires a four (4) hour minimum charge for Friday after 5pm, Saturday, and Sunday. Rental of the RC Family Resource Center is subject to facility policies and Group 1 rentals are limited to use by Partners and others as approved by the Community Services Department Director. Lions Community Centers East and West is the designated rental facility for Group 1 users. 5 • P167 Facility Decorating Discount: Rooms may be reserved for up to two (2) hours prior to and after the event at the rate of 50% of the normal room rental rate for the purposes of set-up and removal of decorations on all rentals over 4 hours in duration. Overtime Fee: For rentals that go over in time from their rental contract and/or are requesting an early entry on the day of a fee will be assessed equal to staff cost plus rental fee to be calculated at a rate of time-and-a-half. Cancellation Fees: In the event the renter requests a cancellation of their rental event after 7 calendar days from the time of application, a cancellation fee is withheld from any fees paid and/or the rental deposit as follows: • $25 for small room rentals • $50 for medium or large room rentals • $75 for full event hall rentals • $100 for the Lewis Family Playhouse 7 Day Grace Period: Requests for cancellation received within 7 calendar days of the initial application will not be assessed a cancellation fee. Refunds of facility rental fees (excluding the Application and Cancellation Fee) will be processed as follows for all facilities excluding the Lewis Family Playhouse: • 30 or more calendar days prior to scheduled rental event —full refund of rental fees, equipment fees and rental deposit (less the$25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) • 15-29 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event —full refund of rental fees, equipment fees (less the $25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) and full forfeiture of rental deposit* • 2 to 14 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event —50% refund of all rental and equipment fees (less the $25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) and full forfeiture of rental deposit* • Less than 2 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event— Forfeiture of all fees- rental and equipment fees and rental deposit*and application fee. *If deposit exceeds estimated amount of rental fees, then 100% of rental and equipment fees will be forfeited and the balance will be refunded. Cancellation Policy —Celebration Hall and Lewis Family Playhouse: Refunds of facility rental fees (excluding the Application and Cancellation Fee) will be processed as follows: • 60 or more calendar days prior to scheduled rental event —full refund of rental fees, equipment fees and rental deposit (less the $25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) • 30 to 59 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event —full refund of rental fees, equipment fees (less the $25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) and full forfeiture of rental deposit* • 14 to 29 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event —50% refund of all rental and equipment fees (less the$25 Application Fee and Cancellation Fee if applicable) and full forfeiture of rental deposit* • Less than 14 calendar days prior to scheduled rental event—Forfeiture of all fees - rental and equipment fees and rental deposit*and application fee. *If deposit exceeds estimated amount of rental fees, then 100% of rental and equipment fees will be forfeited and the balance will be refunded. 6 P168 INDOOR FACILITY ROOM RENTAL FEES CENTRAL PARK - GOLDY S. LEWIS COMMUNITY CENTER Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Room Name Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Room Rental Size Deposit Rancho Rancho Cucamonga Cucamonga Event Hall use No use $75.00 $180.00 $195.00 Hall& Hall& No $105.00 $225.00 $255.00 Hall $500.00 Kitchen _ Kitchen Alta Loma No use $25.00 $60.00 $65.00 Alta Loma No use $35.00 $75.00 $85.00 Large $250.00 Cucamonga No use $25.00 $60.00 $65.00 Cucamonga No use $35.00 $75.00 $85.00 Large $250.00 Etiwanda No use $25.00 $60.00 $65.00 Etiwanda No use $35.00 $75.00 $85.00 Large $250.00 Creative No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Creative Corner Corner No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Medium $250.00 Dance Trail No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Dance Trail No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Chipmunk No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Chipmunk No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Fox No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Fox No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Raccoon No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Raccoon No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Grizzly Gulch No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Grizzly Gulch No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Large $250.00 I Bear Flat /Bear Flat Grizzly Gulch No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Grizzly Gulch No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Bear Flat No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Bear Flat No use $20.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 $55.00 Big Horn No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Big Horn No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Teen Lodge No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Teen Lodge No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Large $250.00 Large Kitchen No use $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 Kitchen No use $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 Kitchen No Fee CENTRAL PARK - JAMES L. BRULTE SENIOR CENTER Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group Group Group 3 Group Room Name Group 1 Group Group Group Room Rental 1 2 4 2 3 4 Size Deposit David Dreier David Dreier Event Hall No use $50.00 $120.00 $130.00 Event Hall Event N East&West East&West No use $70.00 $150.00 $170.00 Hall $500.00 with Kitchen with Kitchen West Hall No use $25.00 $60.00 $65.00 West Hall No use $35.00 $75.00 $85.00 Large $250.00 East Hall No use $25.00 $60.00 $65.00 East Hall No use $35.00 $75.00 $85.00 Large $250.00 Cardio Peak No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Cardio Peak No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Crafters Den No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Crafters Den No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Timber No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Timber Mountain Mountain No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Small $100.00 Clay Creek No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Clay Creek No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Medium $250.00 Game Point No use $20.00 $55.00 $60.00 Game Point No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Medium $250.00 Mesa Mesa Event Courtyard No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Courtyard No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Space $500.00 Lookout No use $15.00 $40.00 $50.00 Lookout Lounge Lounge No use $30.00 $70.00 $80.00 Small $100.00 Large Large Kitchen No use $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 Kitchen No use $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 Kitchen No Fee '5%discount on room rental rates for all Central Park Event Hall bookings of 12 hours or more per occurrence. 7 P169 CIVIC CENTER COURTYARD Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group 1 Group 2 Group Group Room Name Group Group 2 Group Group Room Rental 3 4 1 3 4 Size Deposit 1 As Courtyard approved No use No use No use Courtyard approved No use No use No use Event N/A Rains with Rains with Courtyard app' As No use No use No use Courtyard approved No use No use No use Event N/A Rental Rental I EQUESTRIAN CENTER* Operating Hours Extended Hours Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Room Name 1 2 3 4 Room Name 1 2 3 4 Deposit Small Room No use $10.00 $10.00 $25.00 Small Room No use $15.00 $15.00 $35.00 To be determined Arena No use $10 $10 _ $25 Arena No use $15 $15 $35 To be determined Daily Snack Bar*** No use $5.00 $5.00 $10.00 Daily Snack Bar No use $5.00 $5.00 ' $5.00 To be determined Annual Shared No use $75.00 No fee No fee Annual Shared No use $75.00 No fee No fee To be determined Storage Fee Storage Fee Light Fee** Actual Actual Actual Actual Light Fee Actual Actual Actual Actual N/A Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Includes use of P.A. System.Equestrian Center Lights are reimbursed at 100%of actual energy consumption. Arenas have a coin metered box for electrical cost recovery for drop in use. LIONS CENTER EAST Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Rental 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 _ Size Deposit Regina No fee $2000 0 $53.00 00 $63.00 Regina No fee $32 000 0 $78 0000 Large $250.00 Thomas No fee $11.00 $32.00 $42.00 Thomas No fee $2000 0 $47.00 $58.00 Small $100.00 Aggazzotti No fee $1000 0 $32 0 $42.00 Aggazzotti No fee $21.00 $40000 $58.00 Small $100.00 Galleano No fee $11.00 $32 0000 $42.00 Galleano No fee $20000 $4000 0 $58.00 Small $100.00 LIONS CENTER WEST Operating Hours Extended Hours Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Group Room Rental Room Name 1 2 3 4 Room Name 1 2 3 4 Size Deposit Brookside X X X No fee 00 00 40 Brookside No fee $3490 $70.00 $8400 Large $250.00 with Kitchen $26.00 $58.00 $68.00 with Kitchen $37.00 $73.00 $84.00 Filippi No fee $21.00 0�0 $$ 3 00 $63.00 Filippi No fee $3 W $68.00 $78.00 Large $250.00 Guasti No fee $1$ $3 OQ Guasti No fee $2$2 Q � $ Small $100.00 Opici No fee $1�10 00e0 $32 00 $42.00 Opici No fee $21.00 $58.00 Small $100.00 Small $1840 $1640 $2040 Small $1400 $1-640 $2040 No fee Ne-fee Kitchen No fee $11.00 $16.00 $21.00 Kitchen No fee $11.00 $16.00 $21.00 $100.00 8 P170 RC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Rental 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Size Deposit Mission No use $21.00 $53.00 $63.00 Mission No use $32.00 $6g pp $7$9.00 Large $250.00 Zinfandel No use $2$200 $5300 $63.00 Zinfandel No use $27.00 $69.00 $84.00$8 Large $250.00 Zinfandel North No use � � � Zinfandel North No use $20,00 � $56 88 Small $100.00 $11.00 $32.00 $42.00 $21.00 $47.00 $58.00 Zinfandel South No use $1$200 $32 00 $42 00 Zinfandel South No use $2$28 00 $400 $5�g pp Small $100.00 Grenache No use $1$.00 $32.00 $42.00 Grenache No use $2 0 $47.00 $58.00 Small $100.00 Muscat No use $1200 $32:00 $42'00 Muscat No use $2$200 $400 $58.00$ Small $100.00 der, Ne„ge Ne-fee Ne-fee No-fee barge-Kitehen Ne-use No-fee No-fee Ne-fee No-fee No-fee RC FAMILY SPORTS CENTER -COURTS Basketball Court FeeslCourt I Group 1 GROUP 2 GROUP 3 GROUP 4 Hourly Fee No use $30.00 $45,08 $60.80 $32.00 $47 00 $63.00 Deposit No use $200.00 $200.00 $200.00 RC FAMILY SPORTS CENTER - ROOMS Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Rental 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Size Deposit* Eagle No fee $1$ .00 $32.00 $42.00 Eagle No fee $2$200 $$4467,80 4 00 $5$608 Small $100.00 Hawk No fee $4-e-88 $38.88 $48-88 Hawk No fee $204° $46.08 $667G° Small $100.00 $11.00 $32.00 _ $42.00 $21.00 $47.00 $58.00 Champion No fee $ 08 $40.08 X88 Champion No fee $38 88 � Small $100.00 $21.00 $42.00 $53.00 $32.00 $53.00 $63.00 Viking No fee $2$218-0808 $5$83 00 $63.00 Viking No fee $3 00 $53.00 $63.00$6 0 Large $250.00 'Deposits exclude Group 1 Facility Equipment Use Fees (Community Facilities): NOTE:Not all items may be available at all facilities Item: Fee: Portable Stage (set or strike) $100.00 Portable Public Address System $50.00 Microphone $25.00 each Projector $25.00 Projector with built in screen $50.00 Portable Screen $25.00 Piano $50.00 Piano Tuning $150.00 Large Power(over 30 amps) $1.00 per amp/day Cocktail Tables $12.00 each Outdoor Portable Heaters $50.00 each Linen Rentals Established per use; based on selection Service Fees: Item: Fee: Deputy Sheriff As charged by Sheriffs Department Facility Maintenance Staff As determined by Public Works Services Department 9 P171 VICTORIA GARDENS CULTURAL CENTER Operating Hours Extended Hours Room Name Group Group Group Group Room Name Group 1 Group Group Group Room Rental 1 2 3 4 2 3 4 Size Deposit Celebration Celebration Event Hall No use $65.00 $140.00 $160.00 Hall No use $85.00 $170.00 $185.00 Hall $500.00 A&B&C A&B&C Celebration No use $40.00 $80.00 $95.00 Celebration No use $55.00 $95.00 $105.00 Large $500.00 Hall A Only Hall A Only Celebration No use $40.00 $80.00 $95.00 Celebration No use $55.00 $95.00 $105.00 Large $500.00 Hall B Only Hall B Only Celebration No use $40.00 $80.00 $95.00 Celebration No use $55.00 $95.00 $105.00 Large $500.00 Hall C Only Hall C Only 2/3 of 2/3 of Celebration No use $55.00 $110.00 $130.00 Celebration No use $70.00 $130.00 $150.00 Large $500.00 Hall Hall Studio Studio Theatre No use $40.00 $80.00 $95.00 Theatre No use $55.00 $95.00 $105.00 Large $500.00 (Rehearsal (Rehearsal Hall) _ Hall) Lewis Family Lewis Family Playhouse Playhouse (Theatre& (Theatre& $1,000- Backstage) No use $80.00 $105.00 $105.00 Backstage) No use $105.00 $135.00 $135.00 Theatre $1,500 PREP DAYS PREP DAYS 4 Hour 4 Hour Minimum _ Minimum Lewis Family Lewis Family Playhouse Playhouse (Theatre& (Theatre& $1,000- Backstage) No use $160.00 $210.00 $210.00 Backstage) No use $210.00 $265.00 $265.00 Theatre $1,500 PERFORMAN PERFORMAN DAYS DAYS 4 Hr Minimum 4 Hr Minimum Playhouse No use $55.00 $75.00 $105.00 Playhouse No use $75.00 $95.00 $130.00 Event $500 Lobby Lobby Space Courtyard No use $55.00 $75.00 $105.00 Courtyard No use $75.00 $95.00 $130.00 Event $500 Playhouse: For extended periods of Playhouse rental, negotiated fees may be approved by the Community Services Director. Box Office Fees: Item: Fee: Handling Fee $1.75/ticket Rental Handling Fee $2.00/ticket Reprint Fee $2.00/ticket Exchange Fee $2.00/ticket Internet Fees $2.00 per order plus extra charges applied by tickets.com our web host applies. This fee is based on the prices of the ticket. Not to exceed $5.50 per ticket. Box Office Services $250 plus staff costs (City to sell tickets for organizations/renters) Ticket Printing Only $75 set up charge plus cost of ticket stock 10 P172 Indoor Facility Equipment Use Fees (Victoria Gardens Cultural Center): Item: Fee: Orchestra Pit Conversion $1.200 Portable Stage (large) $1-50$300 (up to 16' x 24') per day Portable Stage (small) $400$150 (up to 12' x 16') per day Single 4 x 8 Deck $25 per day Portable Public Address System $100 Wireless Headset Microphone $25$50 each per day; maximum $140 $200 per week Specialized AV or Rigging Equipment Established per use, based on type of equipment Standard Facility AudioNisual Included in rental Projector $50 S,7'l per day; maximum $400 x300 per week Linen Established per use, based on selection Baby Grand Piano $150 (available for use on stage only) Upright Piano $100 Large Power(over 30 amps) $1 per amp/day Cocktail Table $12 each Piano Tuning Upon Request $200 Concessions Deposit $100 Portable Screen $25 Screen Dress Kit $50 Customized Monogram Gobo $150 (with installation of single lighting fixture $250) Puck Lights $50 each (includes labor) Marquee Fees: Intermittent inclusion of one slide in the weekly schedule for a VGCC rental event (up to 3-weeks prior to event/ Playhouse performance date) $250/week* Exclusive use of Marquee during Courtyard Rental event (during event hours only, up to 6 hrs maximum) $250/hour Turn off Marquee during private Courtyard rental event (during event hours only, up to 2 hours maximum) $75/hour Fee for each additional slide added to scheduled rotation $35/slide * A one-time set up fee of $75 is included in the weekly use fee. Service Fees (Victoria Gardens Cultural Center): Item: Fee: Deputy Sheriff As charged by Sheriffs Department Merchandise Sales by Vendors 10 — 30% as negotiated per event VGCC In-house catering Based on order Marketing Email Blast Fee to be determined based on quantity Marketing Freestanding Poster $50.00 per week Marketing Direct Mailer $250.00 per list, plus postage Specialty Equipment Fee (Victoria Gardens Cultural Center): Equipment rented by City for customer use Cost of rental plus 20% II P173 OUTDOOR PARK FACILITY RENTAL FEES AND FEE POLICIES Application Fee: A non-refundable$10.00 application fee will be applied to every Park Reservation Request. This fee is collected as part of the Park Reservation fee and will be applied to the rental upon its occurrence. In the event of a cancellation at any time, the application fee is withheld. Filming in Neighborhood and Community Parks: Filming for Commercial/Business purposes in neighborhood and community parks is approved based upon availability of park space and requires a film permit. It may require a Temporary Use Permit and any applicable fees or staff costs for City services. Film Permit application process and fees are subject to the Planning Department's criteria and fees currently assessed at$159 for the Film Permit plus a$110 inspection fee. Mobile Lift* Fees Lift Rental $300.00 Equipment is available for rent only for events conducted on City property and would require 2 part-time Staff Members to deliver, operate and return the equipment. • - » Three hours minimal rental $250.00 Each additional hour $50.00/hour Picnic Shelters Some City parks may be reserved for use. Hourly rental fees for picnic shelters located in these parks are as follows: Picnic Shelters Shelter Size Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Small No fee $800 $43,00 $4-8,00 $9.00 $14.00 $19.00 Large No fee $12.00 $1-&90 $2440 $13.00 $19.00 $25.00 Red Hill Community Park Amphitheater The following are hourly rental fees for the Red Hill Park Amphitheater. - Amenity Group 1 Group 2-3 Group 4 $28:00 $50,00 Stage(Flat Fee) No use $27 00 $52 00 Hourly Sound Monitoring No use $15.0° $15.°° Moon Bounce/Inflatable House and/or Specialized Entertainment Equipment Fee A$25,00 $27.00 per bouncer/per piece of specialized entertainment equipment per day fee will be charged at the time the Park Reservation is submitted. 12 P174 Special Event Areas Included in this classification are the following sites. Hourly rental fees are noted in the table below. A damage deposit and police/private security fee may be assessed depending on the activity and/or number of participants. Requires a 2 hour minimum rental. • Red Hill Community Park-event area defined by amphitheatre, adjacent grass covered bowl area and picnic shelters. Event area does not include lake, restrooms, playground or open park space immediately surrounding the lake. Requires rental of shelters D & E. • Heritage Community Park - event area defined as picnic shelters and grass bowl area adjacent to the east and south of the shelters. Perimeter defined by property edges to the east and south; sports field border to the west; park entry to the north. Event area does not include: playground, sports fields, Equestrian Center or equestrian trail. Requires rental of shelters A& B. • Central Park — Event area defined as large elliptical grass area northeast of the Senior/Community Center and immediately adjacent grass areas. Event area includes use of the Central Park Pavilion, if available. Event area does not include: playground. • Central Park Bridge — Event area defined as the bridge southeast of the Senior/Community Center and immediately adjacent grass areas. • Pacific Electric Trail (PET) Staging Area — Event area defined as adjacent to the PET at Central Park immediately north of the Senior/Community Center. Site Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Red Hill Community Park* $7-6:90 $190.00 $150.00 No use $78.00 $105.00 $157.00 Heritage Community Park No use $66 6 WOO $190 86 $53.00 $78.00 $105.00 Central Park** No use $ 699 $400,00 $440,00 $78.00 $105.00 $157.00 Central Park Bridge No use No Fee )0 $53.00 $78.00 PET Staging Area No use $25 90 � $26.00 $53.00 $105.00 *Includes use of Amphitheatre. **Includes use of the Central Park Pavilion(When completed) 13 P175 PARK SPORTS FIELD RENTAL FEES AND FEE POLICIES Community and Neighborhood Park Leagues and Tournaments Should there be a need for City staff to oversee and coordinate activities the fee is $15.0°per hour per staff member required. Applicant is also required to pay all event related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. Community Softball Field & Soccer Fields (Per Field) Organized Leagues, anct Tournaments and any other private resident use. Time Frame Group 1 &2 Group 3&4 Deposit 2 Hours and Less No fee $75-00 $200.00 $79.00 4 Hours and Less No fee $125-00 $200.00 $131.00 All Day No fee $200 700 $200.00 $210.00 Neighborhood and Community Park Lighted Sports Venue Fees: All Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Commission approved youth sports organizations which--are and any other resident travel or recreation youth sports organization which meet an overall residency rate of a minimum of 80% will have their light fee waived in full. Other non-resident sports organizations will pay their light fee in full (100%) for the electrical costs only. Snack-Bar as follows: Greup4 Group-2 Group-3-&-4 Seasonal No-use $480:°° N/A Other Non-profit groups bringing in snack bars (i.e. trailers, canopies, easy-ups) will be charged a flat$300.°° seasonal permit fee, unless group is participating in a City-Sponsored event. A daily permit fee will be charged at a rate of$25.00 per day. Storage For City-Owned storage located in City Parks, fees will be assessed as follows: Group 1 Group 2 Group 3&4 Seasonal No use $7e..00 N/A $78 00 .. . . at a park site without a permit issued by the Community Services Department. '' $--3 Group--4 Daily-Fee N/A $208,90 0 . N/A - 14 P176 EPICENTER RENTAL FEES AND FEE POLICIES Epicenter Community Sport Fields Rental Fees and Deposits Tournament and League Fees for Adult Softball-**, Adult Soccer& Baseball Fields and Special Events at the Epicenter EPICENTER SPORT FIELDS RENTAL FEES AND DEPOSITS Weekday&Weekend Rate Per Field City Holiday Rate Per Field Group 1 &2 Group 3&4 Group 1 &2 Group 3&4 Field Rental-2 Hours& $5Q-00 $4150 700 $75.00 $225:00 Less* $53.00 $158.00 $78.00 $236 00 Field Rental-4 Hours& $1-08,00 $250.00 $140.00 $378.00 Less* $105 00 $262.00 $157.00 $393.00 $280:90 $360.00 $300-00 $525.09 Field Rental-All Day* $210.00 $367.00 $315 00 $551 00 Deposit- $250.00 $400.00 $250.00 $400.00 Infield Lining Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Light Fee Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost Actual Cost includes initial field dragging and watering. The deposit will be applied to the total rental fee. ***Adult softball fields=all 3 softball fields must be rented when renting softball fields When additional City staffing, equipment and material are required for tournaments and/or special event programs scheduled at the Epicenter Sports fields, the applicant is required to pay all event-related expenses. This will include the cost for Police Security when deemed necessary. EPICENTER STADIUM COMPLEX FACILITY RENTAL FEES Stadium Events Ticketed Events* Non-Ticketed Events $2,500.00/day Stadium Rental $3,000.00/day Plus 10%of gross ticket sales Sky Box Rental/Box $50.00/hour $50.00/hour Cafe Area $50.00/hour $50.00/hour Pavilion(3`d base) $75.00/hour $75.00/hour Plaza(151 base) $85.00/hour $85.00/hour EPICENTER PARKING AREA RENTAL FEES Parking Lot Events Ticketed Events Non-Ticketed Events Stadium On-Site $600.00/day $750.00/day Parking Lots A, B, or C Plus 10%of gross ticket sales Stadium On-Site $400.00/day $500.00/day Parking Lots D,E, or F Plus 10%of gross ticket sales Special Event Park Lot $600.00/day $750.00/day Parking Lot G-2(only) Plus 10%of gross ticket sales Special Event Park Lot $1,500.00/day $2,000.00lday Including Parking Lots G-2 and G-3 Plus 10%of gross ticket sales EPICENTER SPECIAL EVENT AREA* RENTAL FEES AND DEPOSITS Site Groups 1-4 Epicenter Grass Event Area* $100.00/hour * Special event area defined as grass area between parking lots A and B. Damage Deposit: $250.00 -- depending on the activity and/or number of participants. 15 P177 EPICENTER FILMING RENTAL FEES General Still Photography Minimum of$250.00 to$500.00 per day,depending on photography (Not for Commercial/For profit purposes) requirements,plus actual costs for City services. Commercial/For Profit Filming Minimum of$3,000-$6,000 per day,depending on filming requirements,plus actual costs for City services. CommerciaUFor Profit Filming in a Parking Lot Minimum of$1,00043,000 per day,depending on filming requirements,plus actual costs for City services. CommerciaUFor Profit Still Photography Minimum of$500-$2,000 per day,depending on filming requirements, plus actual costs for City services. Film Permit Film Permit application process and fees are subject to the Planning Department's criteria and current fees. Location Credit Required City of Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter Stadium Lighting Fee Actual Costs Technical Scout Meeting(s) $250.00 per meeting Planning meeting(s)with technical crew,prior to final contract City Staffing for Epicenter Rentals: City staff will be charged at the rate of$15.00/hour for each staff member. A minimum of one staff member will be assigned to each rental. EPICENTER STADIUM SERVICE FEES AND DEPOSITS Parking Lot Fees Baseball Events Option to charge:$2.00 per car;$15.00 per bus Concerts and Special Events Option to charge:$3.00-$5.00 per car;$5.00-$10.00 per VIP car; and$15.00 per bus.Fifty percent(50%)returns to the City. Parking Lot Events Option to charge:$2.00-$5.00 per car.Fifty percent(50%)returns to the City. Concessions 20%of gross sales from for-profit organizations Food and Beverage 10%of gross sales from non-profit organizations Merchandise and Novelties 20%of gross sales from for-profit organizations (Books,Tapes,CD's, DVD's,Programs,T-shirts,etc.) 10%of gross sales from non-profit organizations Miscellaneous Fees&Charges Additional Move-in/Move-out Days 50%of daily event rental rate Canopy/Tent Maintenance Reserve Fee Minimum of$300.00 to$1,000.00 per event depending on event/rental requirements City Business License Required Minimum of$500.00 to$2,500.00 per day,depending upon Deposit event/rental requirements. At the discretion of the Community Services Director,an additional Deposit may be required depending upon event/rental requirements and the City's liability exposure Applicant is required to pay all event related expenses including personnel,equipment and materials and other related costs. In some Event Expenses instances events at the Epicenter may incur additional fees that are assessed separately from the Police Department,the Building and Safety Division and the Fire District for security services,inspections and/or permits. * Based upon the event proposed, the fees shown may be subject to negotiation. * Based on Provisions of the Municipal Ordinance. ** Exception to Parking Rates applies to vehicles entitled to occupy the preferred parking area (Lot A) delineated in the lease with Rancho Baseball, LLC 16 P178 GENERAL PROGRAM FEES AND FEE POLICIES Non-Resident Charge: Each non-resident shall pay a separate fee for each City sponsored class or program, (each team member, each season in sports) payable at the time of registration as follows: • $12.00 - Classes, workshops, programs. sports activities • $4.00 - Senior programs priced at$10 or more with a duration of no more than five (5) weeks • $12.00 - Senior programs priced $10 or more with a duration of six (6) weeks or more A $12.00 fee shall be paid by each non resident;-eas ---Glassy---- - • ••-• - -- - - - -- - .- - - City sponsored classes and activities.-Said-fee is-payable at the-time of runic}ration - - •- - • - - isle one-day activities-, . - 11 •- - • • - Senior Transportation Program: A$25.00 • annual user fee is applied to all residents using the Senior Transportation Program. Senior Wellness Pass Program: A$15.00 annual user fee is applied to all senior citizen residents using the Senior Wellness Pass Program. Replacement badges: $2.00 for first replacement and $5.00 for each additional. SD Programs: Community Services Department programs Clac-ses and workshops shall be are structured on a cost-covering basis, and fees shall-be-set bet based upon the market rate of similar programs e e •- - •- - - - , , e• _ - . - - - _ : in nearby jurisdictions. Refunds and transfers for classes, workshops and programs will be issued in full if requested prior to the start of the program. After the start of the program, participants may request a refund before the second program meeting date, minus a $10 refund fee. After the second program meeting date, no refunds will be issued. • Exception to the Rule: Aquatics, Youth Sports/Pee Wee Sports have the following refund/credit policy: needs to be applied. Aquatics- Refunds/credits can be given if requested by the Wednesday prior to the start of each session. After the start of the session no refunds/credits will be issued. Youth Sports/Pee Wee Sports-Refunds/credits will be issued one month prior to league games. Less than one month prior to league games refunds/credits will be issued minus a $10 administration refund fee. After the first league game or Pee Wee practice, no refunds/credits will be issued. Community Services Department Partnerships: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Services Department may enter into written agreements with organizations to provide services to residents of Rancho Cucamonga. In such cases. the terms and fees associated with such agreements will be negotiated by staff and approved by the Community Services Director. Registration Fee (Equipment Replacement Fund): A $-1490 $2 :!I Registration Fee will be charged per class or activity registration that will be applied to a fund to repair or replace equipment in Community Services facilities. This fee does not apply to drop-in programs, free programs or building rentals. 17 P179 STAFF REPORT h ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES GROUP LJ RA NCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services By: Chris Paxton, Human Resources Director v\ Subject: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FISCAL YEAR 2013/14 SALARY SCHEDULES FOR CITY JOB CLASSIFICATIONS RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2013/14 salary schedules for City job classifications. BACKGROUND The City Council has previously adopted salary schedules for those classifications employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Periodically these schedules are updated to reflect changes in salaries, additions and deletions of classifications and changes in job titles. While there are no changes in salaries for the fiscal year, there have been some additions and deletions of positions which are reflected in the 2013/14 budget. • Attachments 1. Resolution 2. Salary Schedule for Executive Management employee job classifications 3. Salary Schedule for Mid-Manager, Supervisory/Professional and General employee job classifications 4. Salary Schedule for Maintenance Bargaining Unit (SBPEA) employee job classifications P180 JUNE 19, 2013 L. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL L25. Approval of a Resolution adopting Fiscal Year 2013/2014 salary schedules for City job classifications. RESOLUTION NO. 13-094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/2014, INCLUDING CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS THE RESOLUTION FOR THIS ITEM WILL BE DISTRIBUTED ON MONDAY, JUNE 17, 2013 June 19,2013 City Council Meeting I Revised Version:Tues.,June 18, 2013 I ITEM L25. Approval of a Resolution adopting Fiscal Year 2013/2014 salary schedules for City job classifications. See P180 I RESOLUTION NO. 13-094 RESOLUTION NO. 13-094 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE SALARY SCHEDULES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013/14, INCLUDING CITY COUNCIL BENEFITS. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that it is necessary for the efficient operation and management of the City that policies be established prescribing salary ranges, benefits and holidays and other policies for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has previously adopted salary resolutions establishing salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment for employees of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recognizes that it is necessary from time to time to amend the salary resolution to accommodate changes in position titles, classifications salary ranges, benefits and other terms of employment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California to approve the attached salary schedules and to permit the City Council to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System, the PARS Supplemental Retirement Plan and to participate in the Executive Management Executive Wellness Plan, and a monthly mileage allowance in the amount of two hundred dollars. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , 2013. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice Reynolds, City Clerk • I, Janice Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Meeting of said Council on the day of , 2013. Executed this day of , 2013 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice Reynolds, City Clerk EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES July 2013 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step- Amount Step Amount Animal Services Director 1562 7,310 1602 8,924 1632 10,364 Assistant City Clerk/Records Mgr. 1514 - 5,754 1554 7,024 '1584 8,158 Assistant City Manager 1637 10,626 1677 12,972 1707 15,066 Building and Safety Services Director 1577 7,878 1617 9,617 1647 11,169 City Manager 1734 17,238 1774 21,044 1804 : 24,440 Community Services Director 1595 8,618 1635 10,521 1665 12,219 Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services 1615 9,522 1655 11,624 1685 . 13,500 Deputy City Manager/Econ. & Comm. Dev. 1615 9,522 1655 11,624 1685, 13,500 Eng Svs Director/City Engineer 1596 8,661 1636 10,573 1666 12,280 Finance Director 1597 8,704 1637 10,626 1667 12,341 Human Resources Director 1589 8,364 1629 10,210 1659 . 11,858 Library Director 1579 7,957 1619 9,714 1649 11,281 Planning Director 1.589 8,364 1629 . 10,210 _ 1659 11,858 Public Works Services Director 1577 7,878 1617 9,617 1647 ' 11,169 Fire Chief A 11,950.28 F 15,251.92 Executive Management July 2013 Resolution No. MID MANAGER, SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES July 2013 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Account Clerk 4375 2,850 4415 3,480 4425 3,658 Account Technician 4423 3,621 4463 4,421 4473 4,647 Accountant# 3465 4,462 3505 5,448 3515 5,726 Accounting Manager* 2525 6,019 2565 7,348 2575 7,724 Administrative Secretary' 4424 3,640 4464 4,443 4474 4,670 Administrative Technician 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 Animal Care Attendant 4349 2,504 4389 3,057 4399 3,213 Animal Caretaker 4378 2,893 4418 3,532 4428 3,713 Animal Care Supervisor# 3416 3,495 3456 4,267 3466 4,485 Animal Center Manager* 2506 5,475 2546 6,684 2556 7,026 Animal Handler 4388 3,041 4428 3,713 4438 3,903 Animal License Canvasser 4349 2,504 4389 3,057 4399 3,213 Animal Services Dispatcher 4369 2,766 4409 3,377 4419 . 3,550 Animal Services Officer 4441 3,962 4481 4,836 4491 . 5,084 Assistant City Clerk# 3480 4,809 3520 5,871 3530 6,171 Assistant City Engineer* 2590 8,324 2630 10,162 2640 10,682 Assistant Engineer# 3488 5,005 3528 6,110 3538 6,422 Assistant Library Director* 2572 7,610 2612 9,290 2622 9,765 Assistant Planner# 3468 4,530 3508 5,530 3518 5,813 Assistant to the City Manager* 2548 6,751 2588 8,242 2598 8,663 Associate Engineer# 3518 5,813 3558 7,096 3568' 7,459 Associate Planner# 3487 4,980 3527 6,079 3537 6,390 Box Office Coordinator 4450 4,143 4490 5,058 4500 5,317 Budget Analyst# 3498 5,261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Building Inspection Supervisor#2 3504 5,421 3544 6,617 3554 6,956 Building Inspector2 4464 4,443 4504 5,424 4514 5,702 Business License Clerk 4378 2,893 4418 3,532 4428 3,713 Business License Inspector 4418 3,532 4458 4,312 4468 4,533 Business License Program Coordinator# 3432 3,785 3472 4,621 3482 4,857 Business License Technician 4408 3,360 4448 4,102 4458 4,312 Buyer I 4411 3,411 4451 4,164 4461 4,377 Buyer II # 3433 3,804 3473 4,644 3483 4,882 Code Enforcement Officer 4441 3,962 4481 4,836 4491 5,084 Code Enforcement Supervisor#2 3481 4,833 3521 5,900 3531 6,202 Community Programs Coordinator 4450 4,143 4490 5,058 4500 5,317 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Group Employees Revised July 2013 Community Programs Specialist 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 Community Services Coordinator 4450 4,143 4490 5,058 4500 5,317 Community Services Marketing Coord 4450 4,143 4490 5,058 4500 5,317 Community Services Superintendent* 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Community Services Supervisor# 3480 4,809 3520 5,871 3530 6,171 Community Services Technician 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 Community Svc Marketing Manager* 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Cultural Arts Manager* 2506 5,475 2546 6,684 2556 7,026 Deputy City Clerk# 3430 3,748 3470 4,575 3480 4,809 Engineering Aide 4421 3,585 4461 4,377 4471 4,601 Engineering Technician 4441 3,962 4481 4,836 4491 5,084 Environmental Programs Coordinator# 3503 5,394 3543 6,584 3553 6,921 Environmental Programs Inspector2 4464 4,443 4504 5,424 4514 5,702 Environmental Programs Manager* 2539 6,455 2579 7,880 2589 8,283 Executive Assistant* 2460 4,353 2500 5,314 2510 5,585 Facilities Superintendent* 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Fleet Supervisor#2 3480 4,809 3520 5,871 3530 6,171 GIS Analyst 4456 4,269 4496 5,212 4506 5,479 GIS Technician 4436 3,864 4476 4,717 4486 4,958 GIS/Special District Manager* 2538 6,423 2578 7,841 2588 8,242 Human Resources Manager* 2583 8,039 2623 9,814 2633 10,315 Human Resources Technician 4399 3,213 4439 3,922 4449 4,123 Information Services Analyst I# 3505 5,448 3545 6,650 3555 6,991 Information Services Analyst II# 3520 5,871 3560 7,167 3570 7,534 Information Services Manager* 2584 8,079 2624 9,863 2634 10,367 Information Services Projects Coord.# 3508 5,530 3548 6,751 3558 7,096 Information Services Specialist I 4456 4,269 4496 5,212 4506 5,479 Information Services Specialist II 4471 4,601 4511 5,617 . 4521 5,904 Librarian I# 3435 3,842 3475 4,691 - 3485 4,930 Librarian II# 3457 4,288 3497 5,235 •3507 5,502 Library Assistant I# 3373 2,820 3413 ' 3,443 3423 3,619 Library Assistant II# 3414 3,460 3454 4,224 3464 4,440 Library Clerk 4356 2,593 4396 3,165 ' 4406 3,327 Library Page 4244 1,483 4284 ' 1,810 4294 1,903 Library Page II 4293 1,894 4333 2,312 4343 2,430 Library Services Manager* 2506 5,475 2546 6,684 2556 7,026 Library Technician 3393 3,116 3433 3,804 3443 3,999 Maintenance Supervisor#2 3488 5,005 3528 6,110 3538 6,422 Management Aide 4440 3,942 4480 4,812 4490 5,058 Management Analyst I# 3470 4,575 3510 5,585 3520 5,871 Management Analyst II# 3498 5,261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Management Analyst III# 3515 5,726 3555 6,991 3565 7,348 Office Services Clerk 4369 2,766 4409 3,377 4419 3,550 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Group Employees Revised July 2013 Office Specialist I 4349 2,504 4389 3,057 4399 3,213 Office Specialist II 4369 2,766 4409 3,377 4419 3,550 Park/Landscape Maintenance Supt*2 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Plan Check & Inspection Manager* 2533 6,264 2573 7,648 2583 8,039 Planning Commission Secretary# 3444 4,019 3484 4,906 3494 5,157 Planning Manager* 2583 8,039 2623 9,814 2633 10,315 Planning Specialist 4443 4,001 4483 4,885 4493 5,135 Planning Technician 4423 3,621 4463 4,421 4473 4,647 Plans Examiner# 3482 4,857 3522 5,930 3532 6,233 Principal Librarian* 2495 5,183 2535 6,327 2545 6,651 Principal Management Analyst* 2543 6,585 2583 8,039 2593 8,450 Principal Engineer* 2567 7,422 2607 9,061 2617 9,524 Principal Planner* 2537 6,391 2577 7,802 2587 8,201 Public Services Technician I 4413 3,445 4453 4,206 4463 4,421 Public Services Technician II 4423 3,621 4463 4,421 .4473 4,647 Public Services Technician III 4443 4,001 4483 4,885 4493 5,135 Public Works Inspector 12 4444 4,021 4484 4,909 4494 5,160 Public Works Inspector 112 4464 4,443 4504 5,424 4514 5,702 Public Works Maintenance Manager* 2566 7,385 2606 9,016 2616 9,477 Public Works Safety Coordinator#2 3468 4,530 3508 5,530 3518 5,813 Purchasing Clerk 4374 2,836 4414 3,462 4424 3,640 Purchasing Manager* 2530 6,171 2570 7,534 2580 7,919 Records Clerk 4358 2,619 4398 3,197 4408 3,360 Records Coordinator 4386 3,011 4426 3,676 4436 3,864 Risk Management Coordinator# 3470 4,575 3510 5,585 3520 5,871 Secretary' 4394 3,134 4434 3,826 4444 4,021 Senior Account Clerk 4395 3,149 4435 3,845 4445 4,041 Senior Account Technician 4446 4,062 4486 4,958 4496 5,212 Senior Accountant# 3498 5,261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Senior Administrative Secretary' 4444 4,021 4484 4,909 4494 5,160 Senior Animal Services Officer# 3461 4,374 3501 5,340 3511 5,613 Senior Building Inspector#2 3484 4,906 3524 5,989 3534 6,295 Senior Buyer# 3463 4,418 3503 5,394 3513 5,669 Senior Civil Engineer* 2547 6,717 2587 8,201 2597 8,620 Senior Code Enforcement Officer# 3461 4,374 3501 5,340. 3511 5,613 Senior Electrician # 3485 4,930 3525 6,019 3535 6,327 Senior GIS Analyst# 3484 4,906 3524 5,989 3534 6,295 Senior Information Services Analyst# 3535 6,327 3575 7,724 3585 8,119 Senior Information Services Specialist 4493 5,135 4533 6,268 4543 6,589 Senior Librarian# 3468 4,530 3508 5,530 3518 5,813 Senior Park Planner# 3500 5,313 3540 6,487 3550 6,818 Senior Planner* 2517 5,784 ' 2557 7,061 2567 7,422 Senior Plans Examiner# 3497 5,235 3537 6,390 3547 6,717 Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Group Employees Revised July 2013 Senior Special Districts Technician 4443 4,001 -4483 4,885 4493 5,135 Special Districts Analyst# 3498 5,261 3538 6,422 3548 6,751 Special Districts Technician 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487, 4,983 Street/Storm Drain Maintenance Supt*2 2536 6,359 2576 7,763 2586 8,160 Supervising Public Works Inspector#2 349.4 5,157 3534. 6,295 3544 . 6,617 Theater Production Coordinator 4460 4,355 4500 5,317 4510 5,589 Theater Production Supervisor# 3480 4,809 3520 5,871 3530 6,171 Theatre Technician III 4423 3,621 4463 4,421 4473 4,647 Traffic Engineer* 2569 7,496 2609 9,152 2619 9,620 Utilities Division Manager* 2$84 8,079 . 2624 9,863 2634 10,367 Utility Operations Manager* -2524 5,989 2564 7,312 2574 7,686 Veterinarian* 2579 7,880 2619 9,620 2629 10,112 Veterinary Assistant 4407 3,344 4447 4,082 4457 4,291 Veterinary Technician 4437 3,883 4477 4,741 4487 4,983 1 When acting as Clerk to Commissions$50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off can be substituted in lieu of$50 at the option of the employee. 2. Refer to MOU for provision of boot allowance. #Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class *Denotes Management Class Mid Manager, Supervisory/Professional, and General Group Employees Revised July 2013 Minimum Control Point Maximum Part Time Positions Step Amount Step Amount Sten Amount Account Clerk 6368 15.87 6408 19.37 6418 20.36 Account Technician 6423 20.88 6463 25.49 6473 26.79 Accountant 6465 25.75 6505 31.43 6515 33.04 Administrative Intern 6320 12.48 6360 15.24 6370 16.03 Animal Care Attendant 6349 14.43 6389 17.62 6399 18.52 Animal Caretaker 6378 16.69 6418 20.38 6428 21.42 Animal Handler 6388 17.54 6428 21.41 6438 22.50 Animal License Canvasser 6266 9.54 6306 11.65 6316 12.26 Animal Services Dispatcher 6369 15.95 6409 19.47 6419 20.46 Animal Services Officer 6441 22.84 6481 27.88 6491 29.31 Assistant Engineer 6488 , 28.88 6528 35.25 6538 37.05 Assistant Planner 6468 26.13 6508 31.90 6518 33.54 Assistant Pool Manager 6305 11.60 6345 14.16 6355 14.87 Associate Engineer 6518 33.53 6558 40.94 6568 43.03 Associate Planner 6487 28.73 6527 35.07 6537 36.86 Box Office Assistant 6290 . 10.76 6330 13.13 6340 13.81 Box Office Specialist 6311 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Business License Clerk 6378 16.69 6418 20.38 6428 21.42 Code Enforcement Officer 6441 22.84 6481 27.88 6491 29.31 Community Programs Coordinator 6450 23.89 6490 29.16 6500 30.66 Community Programs Specialist 6437 22.39 6477 27.33 6487 28.73 Community Services Coordinator 6450 23.89 6490 29.16 6500 30.66 Community Services Specialist 6350 14.51 6390 17.71 6400 18.62 Community Services Technician 6437 22.39 6477 27.33 6487 28.73 Department Director 6562 42.17 6604 51.50 6707 86.92 Department Manager 6525 34.73 6566 42.60 6634 59.81 Deputy City Clerk 6430 21.62 6470 26.40 6480 27.75 Division Supervisor 6416 20.16 6457 24.74 6554 40.13 Electrician 6457 24.74 6497 30.20 6507 31.75 Energy Efficiency Coordinator 6372 16.19 6412 19.77 6422 20.78 Engineering Aide 6421 20.67 6461 25.24 6471 26.53 Engineering Technician 6441 22.84 6481 27.88 6491 29.31 Environmental Resources Intern 6280 10.23 6320 12.48 6330 13.13 Equipment Operator 6425 21.09 6465 25.75 6475 27.06 GIS Programmer/Analyst 6456 24.61 6496 30.05 6506 31.58 GIS Intern 6320 12.48 6360 15.24 6370 16.03 GIS Technician 6436 22.28 6476 27.20 6486 28.59 Healthy Cities Coordinator 6372 16.19 6412 19.77 6422 20.78 Human Resources Technician 6399 18.52 6439 22.61 6449 23.77 Instructor/Guard I 6240 8.38 6280 10.23 6290 10.76 Instructor/Guard II 6280 10.23 6320 12.48 6330 13.13 Lead Mechanic 6440 22.73 6480 27.75 6490 29.16 Library Aide 6237 8.25 6277 10.09 6287 10.59 Librarian I 6433 21.95 6473 26.79 6483 28.16 Library Assistant I 6362 15.41 6402 18.81 6412 19.77 Library Assistant II 6404 18.99 6444 23.20 6454 24.37 Library Clerk 6346 14.22 6386 17.37 6396 18.25 Library Page 6237 8.25 6277 10.09 6287 10.59 Library Page II 6280 10.23 6320 12.48 6330 13.13 City Part Time Revised July 2013 Library Technician 6393 17.98 6433 21.95 6443 23.07 Maintenance Technician 6280 10.23 6320 12.48 6330 13.13 Management Aide 6440 22.73 6480 27.75 6490 29.16 Management Analyst I 6470 26.40 6510 32.22 6520 33.87 Management Analyst II 6498 30.35 6538 37.05 6548 38.95 Mechanic 6430 21.62 6470 26.40 6480 27.75 Office Services Clerk 6369 15.95 6409 19.41 6419 20.47 Office Specialist I 6332 13.25 6372 16.19 6382 17.02 Office Specialist II 6352 14.65 6392 17.89 6402 18.80 Outreach Technician 6311 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Planning Aide 6320 12.48 6360 15.24 6370 16.03 Playschool Instructor 6311 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Pool Manager 6329 13.07 6369 15.95 6379 16.76 Principal Engineer 6567 42.82 6607 52.77 6617 54.95 Program Specialist 6311 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Public Services Technician I 6413 19.86 6453 24.25 6463 25.49 Public Services Technician II 6423 20.88 6463 25.49 6473 26.79 Public Services Technician III 6443 23.07 6483 28.16 6493 29.60 Public Works Inspector I 6444 23.19 6484 28.31 6494 29.75 Public Works Inspector II 6464 25.62 6504 31.27 6514 32.87 Purchasing Clerk 6368 15.87 6408 19.37 6418 20.37 Receptionist 6342 13.94 6382 17.02 6392 17.89 Records Clerk 6344 14.08 6384 17.19 6394 18.08 Records Coordinator 6372 16.19 6412 19.77 6422 20.78 Recreation Attendant 6237 8.25 6277 10.09 6287 10.59 Recreation Assistant 6266 9.54 6306 11.65 6316 12.26 Recreation Leader 6290 10.76 6330 13.13 6340 13.81 Secretary 6394 18.07 6434 22.06 6444 23.18 Senior Civil Engineer 6543 37.99 6583 46.37 6593 48.75 Signal and Lighting Technician 6452 24.12 6492 29.46 6502 30.96 Sports Official 6311 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Swim Aide 6266 9.54 6306 11.65 6316 12.26 Theatre Technician I 6311 11.95 6351 14.58 6361 15.33 Theatre Technician II 6372 16.19 6412 19.77 6422 20.78 Veterinary Assistant 6400 18.62 6440 22.73 6450 23.89 Veterinary Technician 6434 22.40 6474 27.35 6484 28.74 City Part Time Revised July 2013 Resolution No. PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES Represented By SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (SBPEA) ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES July 2013 Minimum Control Point Maximum Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount Electrician 5457 4,287 5497 5,234 5507 5,502 Equipment Operator 5425 3,655 5465 4,462 5475 4,690 Inventory Specialist Equipment/Mat 5389 3,054 5429 3,729 5439 3,919 Lead Maintenance Worker 5429 3,729 5469 4,552 5479 4,785 Lead Mechanic 5440 3,939 5480. 4,808 5490 5,054 Maintenance Coordinator 5452 4,182 5492 5,105 5502 5,366 Maintenance Worker 5391 3,085 5431 3,766 5441 3,958 Mechanic 5430 3,747 5470 4,574 5480 4,808 Senior Maintenance Worker 5401 3,243 5441 3,958 5451 4,161 Signal & Lighting Coordinator 5479 4,785 5519 5,841 5529 6,140 Signal & Lighting Technician 5452 4,182 5492 5,105 5502 5,366 Public Works Maint. Employees July 2013 P181 STAFF REPORT I RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT L J RANCHO DATE: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council John Gillison, City Manager FROM: Mike Newcombe, Police Chief BY: Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Steve Wolff, Detective SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF LICENSE AGREEMENT RENEWAL WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FOR ROOF SPACE AT COURTHOUSE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY VIDEO NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the proposed five-year license agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the continued use of 300 square feet of roof and rack space on the County Courthouse located at 8303 Haven Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND Beginning in 2007, the City of Rancho Cucamonga entered into an agreement with the County of San Bernardino to use approximately 300 square feet of roof space located at the 8303 Haven Avenue Courthouse. The roof space along with the associated network equipment rack contains key components of the Public Safety Video Network operated by the Police Department. The courthouse is one of the tallest buildings in this portion of the city and provides an excellent access point for the video network radios which are linked to the city's fiber network infrastructure. The initial agreement ran for three years with a single option to extend that agreement for an additional three years. The current agreement has been in place for the past six years at no cost to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and will sunset on July 31, 2013. The proposed new agreement replaces the existing agreement providing a five year term with the option to extend that term for an additional five years. Throughout the term of this agreement there is no cost incurred by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Public Safety Video Network is in the final stages of completing its phase one deployment. The courthouse location will continue to provide exceptional support for the integrity of our network as it continues to expand over the next several years. This will enable us to provide broader coverage to multiple locations throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. For these reasons, it is recommended that the City Council approve the license agreement with San Bernardino County to continue providing 300 square feet of roof and rack space on the County Courthouse. P182 APPROeAI.of LICENSE AGREEMENT RENEWAl.WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FOR PAGE.2 ROOF SPACE AT COURTHOUSE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY VIDEO NF°IIC'ORK COMMUNICATIONS EQU I PM,.NI' JUNE 19,2013 Respectfully, �1 ) Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst City Manager's Office Attachment: County of San Bernardino License Agreement FOR COUNTY USE ONLY a New FAS Vendor Code Dept. Contract Number P 183 n SC Change ANT n``'"`-''l f Cancel _ • <"}-� ePro Vendor Number ePro Contract Number County Department Dept. Orgn. Contractor's License No. RNT RNT — County Department Contract Representative Telephone Total Contract Amount County of San Bernardino Real Estate Services Department FAS David H. Slaughter, Director (909) 387-5252 $0.00 Contract Type D Revenue iii Encumbered in Unencumbered E- Other: In-Kind-Services CONTRACT TRANSMITTAL If not encumbered or revenue contract type, provide reason: Commodity Code Contract Start Date Contract End Date Original Amount Amendment Amount 8/1/2013 7/31/2018 $0.00 Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No. Amount AAA RNT RNT 8525 33003214 Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No. Amount Fund Dept. Organization Appr. Obj/Rev Source GRC/PROJ/JOB No. Amount I i Project Name Estimated Payment Total by Fiscal Year Rancho Cucamonga-County- FY Amount I/D FY Amount I/D Owned-8303 Haven Ave.-City — — Of Rancho Cucamonga CONTRACTOR City of Rancho Cucamonga Federal ID No. or Social Security No. Contractor's Representative Address 10500 Civic Center Dr., P.O. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Phone (909) 477-2700 Ext. 2000 Nature of Contract: (Briefly describe the general terms of the contract) This license agreement is for a period of five (5) years with one five-year option �\tl�xt,(grid the term. The leased space is approximately 300 square feet of roof top antenna and rack space Iocateci a 3sfr ven Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. Them is no cost for this use. co" (Attach this transmittal to all contracts not prepared,�onn't`he, Standard Contract"form.) Approved as to Legal Form(sign in blue ink) Reevvi�e\wedd'aass ttiiCoritract Compliance Presented to BOS for Signature ■ SEE SIGNATURE PAGE r't; Y y County Counsel Department Head Date _ - Date Date Auditor-Controller/Treasurer/Tax Collector Use Only 0 Contract Database 0 FAS Input Date Keyed By • on.annA nn/nnlnnt n P184 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO LICENSE AGREEMENT LICENSEE: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 COUNTY: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Real Estate Services Department 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, Third Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 PREMISES: Approximately 300 square feet of roof area space located at 8303 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 TERM OF LICENSE: Five (5) years COMMENCEMENT DATE OF LICENSE: August 1, 2013 RENT: None COUNTY CONTRACT NUMBER: REV. 3/1/2011 TYPED: COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO LICENSE AGREEMENT P185 Basic License Terms — Reference Pages LANDLORD: County of San Bernardino COUNTY'S ADDRESS FOR NOTICES: County of San Bernardino Real Estate Services Department 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, Third Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 TENANT: City of Rancho Cucamonga-City Police Services TENANT'S MAILING ADDRESS: 10500 Civic Drive P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91759 TENANT'S TELEPHONE NO. (909) 477-2700 Ext. 2000 PERMISES: Approximately 300 square feet of roof top antenna space w one rack of radio equipment wall-mounted within Fan House#3 RENTABLE AREA: Approximately 300 square feet of roof top space USE: Video surveillance system ANTENNA SPACE: Wall mounted on the exterior of Fan House#3 located on the roof area SCHEDULED COMMENCEMENT DATE: August 1, 2013 TERM OF LEASE: Five(5) years with one five-year option TERMINATION DATE: July 31, 2018 (unless sooner terminated pursuant to the License agreement ANNUAL RENT: None TERMINATION: LICENSEE w/90-days notice upon loss of permits or licenses to operate OPTION TO EXTEND: One(1) five-year option UTILITIES: Provided by Licensor EXHIBITS "A" Premises location, Equipment description & Scope of Work "B" Former County Officials P186 TABLE OF CONTENTS PARAGRAPH CAPTION PAGE 1 PARTIES 2 PREMISES LEASED 3 TERM 4 OPTION TO EXTEND 5 RENT 6 HOLDING OVER 7 RETURN OF PREMISES 8 TAXES 9 USE 10 INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT 11 FAA, FCC AND FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS 12 SIGNS 13 MAINTENANCE/ACCESS TO PREMISES 14 RESERVED 15 ALTERATIONS 16 UTILITIES 17 HOLD HARMLESS 18 INSURANCE SPECIFICATIONS 19 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 20 NOTICES 21 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 22 SUBLEASES 23 INTERFERENCE 24 INCORPORATION OF PRIOR AGREEMENT 25 WAIVERS 26 AMENDMENTS 27 SUCCESSORS 28 SEVERABILITY 29 TIME OF ESSENCE 30 QUIET ENJOYMENT 31 PROVISIONS ARE COVENANTS & CONDITIONS 32 CONSENT 33 EXHIBITS 34 LAW 35 JURY TRIAL WAIVER 36 ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS 37 VENUE 38 FORMER COUNTY OFFICIALS 39 CAPTIONS, TABLE OF CONTENTS &COVER PAGE 40 SURVIVAL 41 TERMINATION 42 USE OF AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 FUNDS AND REQUIREMENTS 43 SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURE OF FEDERAL AWARDS 44 FORCE MAEJURE 45 INTERPRETATIONS Exhibit A—Legal Description Exhibit B —Facility Location of Premises, Site Information, and Equipment & Operating Frequencies Exhibit C—Former County Officials 2 P187 LICENSE AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES: This license is made between City of Rancho Cucamonga ("LICENSEE"), and the County of San Bernardino ("COUNTY"), who agree as follows: 2. PREMISES LEASED: COUNTY leases to LICENSEE and LICENSEE leases from COUNTY approximately 300 square feet of roof top antenna space located at 8303 Haven Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91729 as more particularly described in the attached legal description, Exhibit "A". The location of LICENSEE's equipment, together with the right for access are described and depicted in the attached Exhibit "B", and collectively referred to as the Premises ("Premises"). 3. TERM: This license shall commence on August 1, 2013, and/or upon acceptance of the Premises by LICENSEE, and continue thereafter through July 31, 2018 ("initial term"). In the event the initial term commences prior to the date specified as the result of LICENSEE's written acceptance of possession of the Premises, rent for any partial month shall be prorated based on the actual number of day in the month. 4. OPTION TO EXTEND TERM: COUNTY gives LICENSEE the option to extend the term of the license on the same provisions and conditions, except for the annual fee for one (1) five-year period ("extended term") following expiration of the initial term, provided that at the time of exercise of the applicable option, LICENSEE is not in default with respect to any of the terms, covenants or conditions to be observed or performed by LICENSEE hereunder, by LICENSEEE giving written notice of exercise of the option to COUNTY at least one (1) year, but not more than eighteen (18) months, prior to the expiration of the preceding term. 5. RENT: In lieu of rent the County shall receive increased public safety from the operation of the video surveillance system. 6. HOLDING OVER: In the event the LICENSEE shall hold over and continue to occupy the Premises with the consent of the COUNTY, expressed or implied, the tenancy shall be deemed to be a tenancy from month-to-month upon the same terms and conditions. 7. RETURN OF PREMISES: The LICENSEE agrees that it will, upon any termination of this license, return the Premises in as good condition and repair as the Premises now are or shall hereafter be put; reasonable wear and tear excepted. 8. TAXES: LICENSEE shall pay before delinquency any and all property taxes, assessments, fees, or charges, including possessory interest taxes, which may be levied or assessed upon any personal property, improvements or fixtures installed or belonging to LICENSEE and located within the Premises. LICENSEE shall also pay all license or permit fees necessary or required by law for the conduct of its operation. LICENSEE recognizes and understands that this license may create a possessory interest subject to property taxation and that the LICENSEE may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. P188 9. USE: This license is limited to the purpose of LICENSEE's operating and maintaining a video surveillance system. No other purpose will be permitted. In the event of any condemnation proceedings, COUNTY and LICENSEE shall each be entitled to pursue their own separate awards with respect to a condemnation award. 10. INSTALLATION OF EOUIPMENT: a. As detailed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. b. Prior to commencement of any activity under this license, the LICENSEE shall provide to COUNTY copies of any or all permits required from other agencies. c. Installation: LICENSEE will observe standard safety practices when climbing towers and when installing Improvements. LICENSEE agrees to install, maintain and operate its Improvements in accordance with the highest standard prevailing in the communications industry. d. Access: Access to rack space is on an escorted basis using COUNTY personnel at the appropriate standard time and material billing rates on a portal-to-portal basis. LICENSEE must request site access three (3) working days prior to desired access date. After hours and emergency access requests will be billed at the standard overtime rate then in effect. e. Interference: Improvements shall be located so as not to interfere, physically or electronically, with any of the COUNTY's operations. In the event the COUNTY determines or is notified that the operation of the LICENSEE's Improvements caused or is causing interference to transmission and/or reception of any other communications systems in use in the vicinity of the Site, ISD shall notify LICENSEE to correct the problem and COUNTY reserves the right to immediately remove LICENSEE's equipment from service. If such interference is not eliminated within a twenty-four (24) hour period, COUNTY will immediately terminate this License and take whatever immediate steps are necessary to eliminate said interference, including powering off LICENSEE's equipment without further notifications. 11. FAA, FCC AND FIRE CODE REOUIREMENTS: As a condition precedent to making any use of the Premises of this license, LICENSEE, at its sole expense, will ensure the proposed equipment meet the applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Federal Communication Commission (FCC), and any state, federal, county, or local fire code requirements. COUNTY, at its sole expense, will ensure that the tower on which LICENSEE locates its equipment meets the applicable requirements of the FAA, FCC, and any fire code requirements. Should the continued occupancy of the Premises be in any way prejudiced or prevented due to changes in the FAA, FCC, or any fire code requirements, the LICENSEE herein shall correct, update and comply with said changes at LICENSEE's cost, or shall have the right to terminate this license upon sixty (60) day's written notice to COUNTY. 2 P189 12. SIGNS: LICENSEE may display from the Premises only such sign or signs as are not prohibited by law and which are approved by COUNTY. 13. MAINTENANCE/ACCESS TO PREMISES: LICENSEE shall maintain and operate the Improvements at the sole expense of the LICENSE. Access to the Premises shall be made with appropriate notice, may require escort by COUNTY Communication's personnel. Maintenance/access to be determined on an individual site basis. 14. RESERVED: 15. ALTERATIONS: LICENSEE shall not make any improvements or alterations to the Premises without COUNTY's consent. Any such alterations made shall remain on and be surrendered with the Premises on expiration or termination of the license. 16. UTILITIES: COUNTY shall furnish to the Premises and pay for all service charges for electrical utilities. 17. HOLD HARMLESS: LICENSEE agrees to indemnify, defend (with counsel approved by COUNTY) and hold harmless the COUNTY, its authorized officers, agents, volunteers and employees, from any and all claims, actions, losses, damages, and/or liability arising out of this license from any cause whatsoever, including the acts, errors or omissions of any person, and for any costs of expenses incurred by the COUNTY on account of any claim therefore except where such indemnification is prohibited by law. 18. INSURANCE SPECIFICATIONS: a. COUNTY and LICENSEE are a self-insured public entities for purposes of professional liability, general liability and workers' compensation. b. The LICENSEE agrees to provide insurance set forth in accordance with the requirements herein, which requirements may be satisfied by membership in an approved program of self-insurance. If the LICENSEE uses existing coverage to comply with these requirements and that coverage does not meet the specified requirements, the LICENSEE agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. The type(s) of insurance required is determined by the scope of the lease hereunder. Without in anyway affecting the indemnity herein provided and in addition thereto, the LICENSEE shall secure and maintain throughout the contract term the following types of insurance with limits as shown: 1. Workers' Compensation/Employers Liability — A program of Workers' Compensation insurance or a state-approved, self-insurance program in an amount and form to meet all applicable requirements of the Labor Code of the State of California, including Employer's Liability with $250,000 limits covering all persons including volunteers providing services on behalf of the LICENSEE and all risks to such persons under this lease agreement. 3 P19O If LICENSEE has no employees, it may certify or warrant to the COUNTY that is does not currently have any employees or individuals who are defined as "employees" under the Labor Code and the requirement for Workers' Compensation coverage will be waived by the COUNTY's Director of Risk Management. If, LICENSEE is a non-profit corporation, organized under California or Federal law, volunteers for LICENSEE are required to be covered by Workers' Compensation insurance. 2. Commercial/General Liability Insurance — The LICENSEE shall carry General Liability Insurance covering all operations performed by or on behalf of the LICENSEE providing coverage for bodily injury and property damage with a combined single limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000), per occurrence. The policy coverage shall include: (a) Premises operations and mobile equipment. (b) Products and completed operations. (c) Broad form property damage (including completed operations). (d) Explosion, collapse and underground hazards. (e) Personal injury (f) Contractual liability. (g) $2,000,000 general aggregate limit. 3. Commercial Property Insurance providing all risk coverage for the leased premises, building, fixtures, equipment and all property constituting a part of the premises. Coverage shall be sufficient to insure One Hundred percent (100%) of the replacement cost. 4. Automobile Liability Insurance — Primary insurance coverage shall be written on ISO Business Auto coverage form for all owned, hired and non-owned automobiles or symbol 1 (any auto). The policy shall have a combined single limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) for bodily injury and property damage, per occurrence. If the LICENSEE is transporting one or more non-employee passengers in the use of this lease, the automobile liability policy shall have a combined single limit of two million dollars ($2,000,000) for bodily injury and property damage per occurrence. If the LICENSEE owns no autos, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 5. Umbrella Liability Insurance - An umbrella (over primary) or excess policy may be used to comply with limits or other primary coverage requirements. When used, the umbrella policy shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury and shall include a "dropdown" provision providing primary coverage for any liability not covered by the primary policy. The coverage shall also apply to automobile liability. 4 P191 c. If LICENSEE performs any construction of the Premises, LICENSEE shall also procure and maintain coverages as follows: 1. For construction contracts for projects over One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) and less than Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000) require limits of not less than Three Million Dollars in General Liability and Auto Liability coverage. 2. For construction contracts for projects over Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000) and less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) require limits of not less than Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) in General Liability and Auto Liability coverage. 3. For construction contracts for projects over Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) and less than Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000) require limits of not less than Ten Million Dollars (10,000,000) in General Liability and Auto Liability coverage. 4. Subcontractor Insurance Requirements. The LICENSEE agrees to require all parties or subcontractors, including architects or others it hires or contracts with related to the performance of this contract to provide insurance covering the contracted operation with the basic requirements for all contracts in B1 and the insurance sections for all contracts in B2, (including waiver of subrogation rights) and naming the COUNTY as an additional insured. The LICENSEE agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility ensuring that such coverage is provided as required here. 5. Course of Construction/Installation (Builder's Risk) property insurance providing all risk, including theft coverage for all property and materials to be used on the project. The insurance policy shall not have any coinsurance penalty. 19. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: a. Additional Insured — All policies, except for the Workers' Compensation, shall contain endorsements naming the COUNTY and their officers, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds with respect to liabilities arising out of the use under this lease hereunder. The additional insured endorsements shall not limit the scope of coverage for the COUNTY to vicarious liability but shall allow coverage for the COUNTY to the full extent provided by the policy. Such additional insured coverage shall be at least as broad as Additional Insured (Form B) endorsement form ISO, CG 2010.11 85. b. Waiver of Subrogation Rights — The LICENSEE shall require the carriers of required coverages to waive all rights of subrogation against the COUNTY, their officers, employees, agents, volunteers, contractors and subcontractors. All general or auto liability insurance coverage provided shall not prohibit the LICENSEE and LICENSEE's employees or agents from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss or claim. The LICENSEE hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the COUNTY. c. Policies Primary and Non-Contributory — All policies required herein are to be primary and non-contributory with any insurance or self-insurance programs carried or administered by the COUNTY. 5 P192 d. Severability of Interests — The LICENSEE agrees to ensure that coverage provided to meet these requirements is applicable separately to each insured and there will be no cross liability exclusions that preclude coverage for suits between the LICENSEE and the COUNTY or between the COUNTY and any other insured or additional insured under the policy. e. Proof of Coverage — The LICENSEE shall furnish Certificates of Insurance to the San Bernardino Real Estate Services Department (RESD) administering the lease evidencing the insurance coverage, including endorsements, as required, prior to the commencement of performance of services hereunder, which certificates shall provide that such insurance shall not be terminated or expire without thirty (30) days written notice to RESD, and LICENSEE shall maintain such insurance from the time LICENSEE commences use under the lease hereunder until the end of the period of the lease. f. Acceptability of Insurance Carrier — Unless otherwise approved by the County Department of Risk Management, insurance shall be written by insurers authorized to do business in the State of California and with a minimum "Best" Insurance Guide rating of "A- VII". g. Insurance Review — Insurance requirements are subject to periodic review by the COUNTY. The County's Director of Risk Management or designee is authorized, but not required, to reduce, waive or suspend any insurance requirements whenever the County's Department of Risk Management determines that any of the required insurance is not available, is unreasonably priced, or is not needed to protect the interests of the COUNTY. In addition, the County's Director of Risk Management or designee is authorized, but not required, to change the above insurance requirements to require additional types of insurance coverage or higher coverage limits, provided that any such change is reasonable in light of past claims against the COUNTY, inflation, or any other item reasonably related to the COUNTY's risk. Any change requiring additional types of insurance coverage or higher coverage limits must be made by amendment to this lease. LICENSEE agrees to execute any such amendment within thirty (30) days of receipt. Any failure, actual or alleged, on the part of RESD or COUNTY to monitor or enforce compliance with any of the insurance and indemnification requirements will not be deemed as a waiver of any rights on the part of RESD or the COUNTY. h. Failure to Procure Insurance. All insurance required must be maintained in force at all times by LICENSEE. Failure to maintain said insurance, due to expiration, cancellation, etc., shall be cause for the COUNTY to give notice to immediately suspend all LICENSEE's business activities on the Premises. Failure to reinstate said insurance within the (10) days of notice to do so shall be cause for termination and for forfeiture of this agreement, and/or COUNTY, at its discretion, may procure or renew such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, and all monies so paid by COUNTY shall be repaid by LICENSEE to COUNTY upon demand but only for the pro rata period of non-compliance. 6 P193 i. COUNTY shall have no liability for any premiums charged for such coverage(s). The inclusion of COUNTY as additional named insured is not intended to and shall not make a partner or joint venturer with LICENSEE in LICENSEE's operations. J. The LICENSEE agrees to require all parties or subcontractors, or others it hires or contracts with related to the use of this lease to provide insurance covering such use with the basic requirements and naming the COUNTY as additional insured. LICENSEE agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided as required herein. 20. NOTICES: Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other party shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address. Notice shall be deemed communicated two (2) COUNTY working days from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this paragraph. COUNTY's address: Real Estate Services Department 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, Third Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415 Also send a notice to the San Bernardino County Information Services Department, Communications Division as follows: Information Services Department 777 East Rialto Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92415-0740 LICENSEE's address: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 ATTN: City Manager's Office 21. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: a. "Hazardous Materials" shall mean any substance deemed to be hazardous, toxic or dangerous in any Hazardous Waste Law, and shall include petroleum. "ACMs" shall mean asbestos containing materials. "Hazardous Water Laws" shall mean all applicable federal, state, or local laws or regulations governing Hazardous Materials and/or ACMs. b. Neither LICENSEE or COUNTY has, nor will, generate, store or dispose of any Hazardous Materials or ACMs on or about the Premises in violation of any Hazardous Waste Laws. To the best of COUNTY's knowledge, COUNTY does not know of the existence of any Hazardous Materials or ACMs on the Premises in violation of any Hazardous Waste Laws 7 P194 and COUNTY has not received any written notice of any violation of Hazardous Waste Laws, or any written directive to perform any work in accordance therewith. COUNTY shall be responsible for remediation of any release of any Hazardous Materials in accordance with all applicable laws, which release does not result from LICENSEE's activities. LICENSEE shall be responsible to the extent any release results from LICENSEE's activities. Notwithstanding the foregoing, COUNTY shall be responsible for abating any ACMs that will be disturbed by LICENSEE's permitted use. 22. SUBLEASES: LICENSEE may not assign or sublease this license nor any interest herein. 23. INTERFERENCE: a. Except as permitted by this license, LICENSEE shall not use the Premises in any way which interferes with the use of the Premises by COUNTY, or by tenants and licensees of COUNTY with rights prior in time to the date of this license. COUNTY shall not use, or permit other tenants, licensees, employees, invitees, or agents subsequent in time to the date of this license to use the Premises in any way which interferes with LICENSEE's permitted uses. b. In the event the Premises are used by LICENSEE for any purpose which constitutes interference or a nuisance, this license may be terminated by the COUNTY unless LICENSEE shall abate such interference/nuisance within thirty (30) days after COUNTY has served LICENSEE written notice requiring such abatement. 24. INCORPORATION OF PRIOR AGREEMENT: This license contains all of the agreements of the parties hereto with respect to any matter covered or mentioned in this license, and no prior agreement or understanding pertaining to any such matter shall be effective for any purpose. 25. WAIVERS: No waiver by either party of any provisions of this license shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision hereof or of any subsequent breach by either party of the same or any other provisions. 26. AMENDMENTS: No provision of this license may be amended or added to except by an agreement in writing signed by the parties hereto or their respective successor in interest, expressing by its terms an intention to modify this license. 27. SUCCESSORS: This license shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. 28. SEVERABILITY: If any word, phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, section, article, part or portion of this license is or shall be invalid for any reason, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder hereof and shall in no way affect or impair the validity of this license or any other portion thereof. 8 P195 29. TIME OF ESSENCE: Time is of the essence of each provision of this license which specifies a time within which performance is to occur. In the absence of any specific time for performance, performance may be made within a reasonable time. 30. OUIET ENJOYMENT: Subject to the provisions of this license and conditioned upon performance of all the provisions to be performed by LICENSEE hereunder, COUNTY shall secure to LICENSEE during the license term the quiet and peaceful possession of the Premises and all right and privilege appertaining thereto. 31. PROVISIONS ARE COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS: All provisions, whether covenants or conditions, on the part of either party shall be deemed to be both covenants and conditions. 32. CONSENT: Whenever consent or approval of either party is required that party shall not unreasonably withhold or delay such consent or approval. 33. EXHIBITS: All exhibits referred to are attached to this license and incorporated by reference. 34. LAW: This license shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 35. JURY TRIAL WAIVER: COUNTY and LICENSEE hereby waive their respective right to trial by jury of any cause of action, claim, counterclaim or cross-complaint in any action, proceeding and/or hearing brought by either COUNTY against LICENSEE or LICENSEE against COUNTY on any matter whatsoever arising out of, or in any way connected with, this license, the relationship of COUNTY and LICENSEE, LICENSEE's use or occupancy of the Premises, or any claim of injury or damage, or the enforcement of any remedy under any law, statute, or regulation, emergency or otherwise, now or hereafter in effect. 36. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS: If any legal action is instituted to enforce or declare any party's rights hereunder, each party, including the prevailing party, must bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. This paragraph shall not apply to those costs and attorneys' fees directly arising from any third party legal action against a party hereto and payable under Paragraph 16, "HOLD HARMLESS". 37. VENUE: The parties acknowledge and agree that this license was entered into and intended to be performed in San Bernardino County, California. The parties agree that the venue for any action or claim brought by any party to this license will be San Bernardino County. Each party hereby waives any law or rule of court which would allow them to request or demand a change of venue. If any action or claim concerning this license is brought by any third party, the parties hereto agree to use their best efforts to obtain a change of venue to the Central District of San Bernardino County. • 38. FORMER COUNTY OFFICIALS: LICENSEE agrees to provide or has already provided information on former COUNTY administrative officials (as defined below) who are employed by or represent LICENSEE. The information provided includes a list of 9 P196 former COUNTY administrative officials who terminated COUNTY employment within the last five years and who are now officers, principals, partners, associates or members of the business. The information should also include the employment and/or representative capacity and the dates these individuals began employment with or representation of your business. For purposes of this provision, "COUNTY administrative official" is defined as a member of the Board of Supervisors or such officer's staff, COUNTY Administrative Officer or member of such officer's staff, COUNTY department or group head, assistant department or group head, or any employee in the Exempt Group, Management Unit or Safety Management Unit. (See Exhibit "B", List of Former County Officials.) 39. CAPTIONS, TABLE OF CONTENTS AND COVER PAGE: The paragraph captions, table of contents and the cover page of this license shall have no effect on its interpretations. 40. SURVIVAL: The obligations of the parties which, by their nature, continue beyond the term of this license, will survive the termination of this license. 41. TERMINATION: The license may be terminated by either party hereto without liability of any kind whatsoever at any time without explanation, cause or reason upon ninety (90) days' prior written notice to the other party. 42. USE OF AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009 FUNDS AND REQUIREMENTS: This Contract may be funded in whole or in part with funds provided by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("ARRA"), signed into law on February 17, 2009. Section 1605 of ARRA prohibits the use of recovery funds for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance or repair of a public building or public work(both as defined in 2 CFR 176.140) unless all of the iron, steel and manufactured goods (as defined in 2 CFR 176.140) used in the project are produced in the United States. A waiver is available under three limited circumstances: (i) Iron, steel or relevant manufactured goods are not produced in the United States in sufficient and reasonable quantities and of a satisfactory quality; (ii) Inclusion of iron, steel or manufactured goods produced in the United States will increase the cost of the overall project by more than 25 percent; or (iii) Applying the domestic preference would be inconsistent with the public interest. This is referred to as the "Buy American" requirement. Request for a waiver must be made to the County for an appropriate determination. Section 1606 of ARRA requires that laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors on projects funded directly by or assisted in whole or in part by and through the Federal Government pursuant to ARRA shall be paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing on projects of a character similar in the locality as determined by the Secretary of Labor in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 31). This is referred to as the "wage rate" requirement. The above described provisions constitute notice under ARRA of the Buy American and wage rate requirements. Contractor must contact the County contact if it has any questions regarding the applicability or implementation of the ARRA Buy American and wage rate requirements. Contractor will also be required to provide detailed information regarding compliance with the t0 P197 Buy American requirements, expenditure of funds and wages paid to employees so that the County may fulfill any reporting requirements it has under ARRA. The information may be required as frequently as monthly or quarterly. Contractor agrees to fully cooperate in providing information or documents as requested by the County pursuant to this provision. Failure to do so will be deemed a default and may result in the withholding of payments and termination of this Contract. Contractor may also be required to register in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database at http://www.ccr.gov and may be required to have its subcontractors also register in the same database. Contractor must contact the County with any questions regarding registration requirements. 43. SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURE OF FEDERAL AWARDS: In addition to the requirements described in "Use of ARRA Funds and Requirements," proper accounting and reporting of ARRA expenditures in single audits is required. Contractor agrees to separately identify the expenditures for each grant award funded under ARRA on the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) and the Data Collection Form (SF-SAC) required by the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Nonprofit Organizations." This identification on the SEFA and SF-SAC shall include the Federal award number, the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number, and amount such that separate accountability and disclosure is provided for ARRA funds by Federal award number consistent with the recipient reports required by ARRA Section 1512 (c). In addition, Contractor agrees to separately identify to each subcontractor and document at the time of sub-contract and at the time of disbursement of funds, the Federal award number, any special CFDA number assigned for ARRA purposes, and amount of ARRA funds. Contractor may be required to provide detailed information regarding expenditures so that the County may fulfill any reporting requirements under ARRA described in this section. The information may be required as frequently as monthly or quarterly. Contractor agrees to fully cooperate in providing information or documents as requested by the County pursuant to this provision. Failure to do so will be deemed a default and may result in the withholding of payments and termination of this Contract. A. Whistleblower Protection. Contractor agrees that both it and its subcontractors shall comply with Section 1553 of the ARRA, which prohibits all non-Federal contractors, including the State, and all contractors of the State, from discharging, demoting or otherwise discriminating against an employee for disclosures by the employee that the employee reasonably believes are evidence of: (1) gross mismanagement of a contract relating to ARRA funds; (2) a gross waste of ARRA funds; (3) a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety related to the implementation or use of ARRA funds; (4) an abuse of authority related to the implementation or use of recovery funds; or (5) a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to an agency contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract) awarded or issued relating to ARRA funds. Contractor agrees that it and its subcontractors shall post notice of the rights and remedies available to employees under Section 1553 of Division A, Title XV of the ARRA. 44. FORCE MAEJURE: COUNTY shall not be held liable for any delay or failure in performance of any part of this agreement from any cause beyond its control and without its 11 P198 fault or negligence, such as acts of God, acts of civil or military authority, government regulations, strikes, labor disputes, embargoes, epidemics, war, terrorist acts, riots, insurrections, fire, explosions, earthquakes, nuclear accidents, floods, power blackouts, brownouts or surges, volcanic action, other major environmental disturbances, unusually severe weather conditions, inability to secure product or services of other persons or transportation facilities, or acts or omissions of transportation common carriers. ***THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK*** 12 P199 45. INTERPRETATIONS: As this agreement was jointly prepared by both parties, the language in all parts of this agreement shall be construed, in all cases, according to its fair meaning, and not for or against either party hereto. END OF LICENSE TERMS. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO LICENSEE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Janice Rutherford, Chair L. Dennis Michael Board of Supervisors Dated: Title: Mayor Dated: SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DELIVERED ATTEST : TO THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD Janice Reynolds LAURA H. WELCH, Clerk of the Board Title: City Clerk of Supervisors Dated: By: Deputy Date: Approved as to Legal Form: Approved as to Legal Form: Jean-Rene Basle, County Counsel By: _ City Attorney By: Robert Messinger, Deputy County Counsel Dated: 13 P200 EXHIBIT "A" PREMSIES DESCRIPTION/LOCATION PAGES 1-3 Scope of Work Location: County of San Bernardino Courthouse 8303 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Photographs: $ - •-• Foothill BM. *ell yam` i kk � ' 111 } 1 • 1 ''-111 ••1 1'lit 1 iv4 ,1( !'1'�'j•'+*,11 • I 1 1"1 1 I�u •N'�• i _ - . II i n .i• i - ... . , . ............%,.. . ........ -T. . . 44, .. :.1 1 s1 au.' ■ ,l ipi .. .II 11 4 i I „ , & NMI .,IS .11 . ;a , ; r - -- ••••-■•••••-tr- .... --..• --. lit, 41114** 4%, a` • • . . . s• . 21,-,:p.•7' " ' T.,.4" 4, To a .. ' ----- + �u g , ! ' #3 #2 #t I 1 . -1._' Iktr r 4 ' - 1 1 1 r ! , , 1 1 w / • i i14 1t / • ll� � N. 1 1011 Ell i� 1;14' / -. - ., tip •• fI(4 ' . ./ :4/ Jr I ;vim.DIf, y i ` I s 1r A A •. .Iii 'a , —. On the roof of the courthouse are four separate HVAC air handler houses. Fan house#3 would be the location where we would install our equipment. 14 P201 Photographs: Current equipment installed on Fan House#3. == 10 r mactio Communication microwave transceivers located on the east wall of Fan House#3. Equipment Mounting Options • Uni-strut to Parapet wall(Recommended Uses existing struts on east wall) Uni-strut along a parapet wall Anchors/bolts Weatherproofing Heavy-duty clamping 2" RIGID conduit Connect to ground • Non-Penetrating Kit(frame alone is over 600Ibs) 4" Square Sleepers—if sled is not padded Roof Frame— 10.5'or 12' base. 120"vertical posts Extra pipe clamps for 2-3/8" pipe Cinderblock for gravity Connect to ground • Tower on roof Not recommended 15 P202 Roof-Top Equipment To Be Installed • Backhaul Antennae and accessories(3 each) 120degree Sector Panel for 5.8 Ghz Backhaul (this is the host) LMR400 patch cords from antenna to lightning arrestor LMR400 patch cord from lightning arrestor to radio Polyphaser Lightning Arrestors—one per antenna Bulkead to Flange kits for arrestors Times Microwave weatherproofing kits Wall penetration to use existing conduit opening on east wall • Optionally we can add antennae to the 2.4Ghz access radios The 2.4Ghz antennae will require similar parts as above Equipment To Be Installed Inside Fan House#3 • Plywood Backboard on existing open wall space. • 20 Amp AC Power Circuit. • Ground Connectivity to Home-Run Ground. • Fiber Optic cable installation from Rancho Cucamonga City Hall MDF to Fan House#3. o Cable installation will follow available conduit from Fan House#3 to Courthouse sub-basement where it will connect to existing conduit to City Hall. • NEMA cabinet to house electronic communication equipment • Fiber to Ethernet converter or, • Optional Cisco Catalyst 2955T-12 switch to add cameras. General Description of Work To Be Completed Using the existing strut hardware already mounted on the east wall of fan house#3, a section of rigid 2"conduit will be attached to the strut. This piece of conduit will support the radio antennas that are slightly smaller than a standard phonebook. This conduit will be raised to a height that will be able to clearly receive the signal being transmitted from our remote location near Quake's Stadium. The antennas will extend slightly above the roof line of fan house#3. Coaxial cables from the antennas will penetrate the east wall of fan house#3 using the existing conduit opening connecting the existing microwave dishes already in place. A plywood backboard will be installed on available wall space located inside fan house#3. All necessary electrical power will be located on this backboard to support the necessary electronics. A secure housing will be mounted on the backboard as well to contain the electronics. The electronics will consist of radio receivers, network switches and converters. Fiber optic cable will be installed from this secure housing to the sub-basement of the courthouse. The cable will follow available conduit space already in place. This conduit run is located near the existing elevator shaft. From the sub-basement location, the fiber optic cable will connect with an existing conduit connection where existing fiber optic cable is already in place. 16 P203 EXHIBIT "B" LIST OF FORMER COUNTY OFFICIALS INSTRUCTIONS: List the full name of the former COUNTY Administrative Official, the title/description of the Official's last position with the COUNTY, the date the Official terminated COUNTY employment, the Official's current employment and/or representative capacity with the LANDLORD, the date the Official entered LANDLORD's employment and/or representation. OFFICIAL'S NAME: REOUIRED INFORMATION 17 P204 STAFF REPORT cte4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT j RANCHO Date: June 11, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council, John Gillison, AICP, City Manager From: Mike Newcombe, Chief of Police By: Mark Plamondon, Lieutenant Subject: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Application RECOMMENDATION: The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department recommends the council accept grant revenue in the amount of $24,741.00 from the United States Department of Justice 2013/14 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant. It is also recommended the council agree the County of San Bernardino, Law and Justice Group, serve as the fiscal agent/grant administrator and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall agree to pay them a fee of five percent (5%), $1237.00, for administrative costs. The net award amount shall be $23,504.00. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS: The United States Department of Justice Programs, Byrne Justice Assistance (BJA) recently announced the availability of grant funds to state and local units of government through the Byrne JAG Grant. This program allows state and local governments to support a broad range of activities to prevent and control crime and to improve the criminal justice system. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has been earmarked to receive $24,741.00. The County of San Bernardino, law and Justice Group shall serve as the fiscal agent/grant administrator. In accepting the grant, the City of Rancho Cucamonga agrees to pay the San Bernardino County Law and Justice Group a fee of five percent (5%) of the award amount ($1237.00) for administrative costs. The net award amount shall be $23,504.00. Funds shall be utilized by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department to purchase additional cameras for the Public Safety Video Camera Project. It is a requirement of the grant for the City Manager, City Clerk and City Attorney sign two copies of the Interlock Agreement and both copies be returned to the County of San Bernardino Law and Justice Group. This requirement has already been fulfilled. This application shall also be made public and an opportunity be provided for citizens to comment on the application. P205 EDWARD BYRNE.MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT APPLICA'T'ION PAGE 2 JUNE 11,2013 FISCAL IMPACT: None. This action only allows the Police Department to meet the requirements set forth by the United States Department of Justice Programs to complete the application for funding. CONCLUSION: It is recommended the Rancho Cucamonga City Council accepts grant funds made available through the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice assistance Grant. Respectfully . e 7 Ike Newcombe Chief of Police P206 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT LiJ Date: June 19, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Subject: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00101 AND ADDENDUM TO GENERAL PLAN FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR) (SCH #2000061027) - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A supplement to Development Code Update (DRC2010-00571) amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to clarify definitions and administrative procedures, correct prior errors and omissions, and regulate cottage food operations and ancillary equipment within industrial zones. An Addendum to the General Plan FPEIR has been prepared for this project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the second reading of Ordinance Number 860 as acted upon by the City Council at a public hearing at the June 5, 2013 meeting, thereby approving a supplemental update to the Development Code. BACKGROUND: On June 5, 2013, staff provided an oral presentation at a public hearing to the City Council detailing the changes prescribed in Ordinance Number 860. The changes prescribed in Ordinance Number 860 are mostly procedural in nature. They would: (1) reinstate development standards that were unintentionally omitted; (2) correct errors in translation of the allowed land use tables; (3) incorporate required changes consistent with State Law (AB 1616); and (4) clarify existing regulations. The Ordinance has been drafted to be consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, adopted in May 2010. In addition, Ordinance Number 860 adopts an addendum to the General Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2000061027). This Development Code Amendment does not propose any substantial changes in the City's development regulations that were not analyzed in the General Plan EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects, or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. As a consequence, an addendum is the appropriate level of environmental review. Respectfull submitted, Candyce rnett Planning Manager • CB:JN/Is • P207 ORDINANCE NO. 860 (SECOND READING) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00101, A SUPPLEMENTAL UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. On May 8, 2013, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 13-22, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. 2. On June 5, 2013, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: This City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: Based upon substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced public hearing on June 5, 2013, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The City desires to adopt a supplemental update to the Development Code in order to (i) clarify definitions and administrative procedures; (ii) correct prior errors and omissions; and (iii) regulate cottage food operations and ancillary equipment in industrial zones; and b. The City has prepared a set of amendments (the "Amendments"), which is included as Attachment 1. SECTION 3: The City has prepared an Addendum (the "Addendum") to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2000061027) (the "Final EIR"), attached hereto as Attachment 2 to this Ordinance, which confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the Development Code Update were adequately addressed in the Final EIR, and that a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not required for the Development Code Update. The City Council finds that the Addendum complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, its implementing regulations at 14 California Code of Regulations § 15000 et seq., and the City's local CEQA guidelines (collectively "CEQA"). SECTION 4: The City Council hereby adopts the Amendments to the Development Code attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein by reference as Attachment 1. SECTION 5: The Council hereby directs the City Clerk to make all necessary, non-substantive conforming revisions to the Municipal Code necessary to codify this Ordinance, P208 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.860 DRC2013-00101 — DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT June 5, 2013 Page 2 including, but not limited to, clerical corrections to section numbers, table and figure references, and cross references. SECTION 6: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is, for any reason, deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, or preempted by legislative enactment, such decision or • legislation shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City • Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or words thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, or words might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional or preempted by subsequent legislation. SECTION 7: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a Summary of this Ordinance to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P209 Staff is recommending the following amendments to the Development Code. These n of amendments are shown in track changes as excerpts from relevant sections o the e Development Code with new language shown with underlined text and existing language to be removed shown with strike out text. Article II Land Use and Development Procedures Chapter 17.14 General Application Processing Procedures Section 17.14.060 Approving Authority TABLE 17.14.060-1 APPROVING AUTHORITY FOR LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS Designated Approving Authority "R" = "Recommending Body" Type of Permit or Decision "F"= "Final Decision-Making Body" Planning Historic Planning City Director Preservation Commission Council Commission Official Code Interpretation F Plan Check/Zoning Clearance F Home Occupation Permit F Sign Permit F Temporary Use Permit F Tree Removal Permit F Uniform Sign Program F Similar Use Determination F Reasonable Accommodation F Site Development Review F Minor Exception F Conditional Use Permit F Minor Design Review F Hillside Development Review F Large Family Day Care Permit F Mills Act R R F Landmark Designation R R F Certificate of Appropriateness R F Certificate of Economic Hardship R F Entertainment Permit R F Design Review R F Variance R F ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P210 Designated Approving Authority Type of Permit or Decision "R" ="Recommending Body" • "F"="Final Decision-Making Body" Adult Entertainment Permit R F Tentative Subdivision Map(see Title 16) R F Planned Community R R F Specific Plan R R F Prezoning R R F Development Code/Zoning Map R R F Amendment Development Agreement R R F General Plan Amendment R R F Section 17.14.070 Appeals A. Appeal Authority. Any interested person may appeal any action of the Planning Director, Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission made pursuant to this Article to the designated appeal authority listed in Table 17.14.070-1 (Appeal Authority) within ten (10) days from the date of the action. Actions by the City Council are final and no further administrative appeals are available. Chapter 17.16 Planning Director Decisions Section 17.16.025 Director Determination Process (with Notice) B. Purpose. Certain administrative permits and entitlements decided by the Planning Director require a notice to neighboring property owners. C. Applicability. Notice for Director Determination shall be provided for the following applications: 1. Tree Removal Permit (only if six [6] or more) 2. Minor Exceptions 3. Conditional Use Permits 4. Large Family Day Care D. Notice of Application. Notice of the filing of an application for those applications identified in Subsection B above shall be mailed to persons owning property within six hundred sixty feet (660') of the project site; in the case of tree removal permits or minor exceptions, notice is only required to adjacent properties. For large family day care permits. notice is required one hundred feet (100') of the project site. The notice shall specify that the application will be decided by the City following an open public Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P211 comment period where comment is received on or before a date specified in the notice which shall be ten (10) days after the date of mailing. This notice shall also include an explanation of appeal rights. E. Decision. The Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny applications • listed in this Section. Decisions shall be based on standards and criteria set forth within this Code and shall be accompanied by brief, written findings and a determination. Planning Director decisions listed in Subsection 17.16.025.B (Applicability) above may be appealed to the Planning Commission. Section 17.16.080 Tree Removal Permit D. Permit Requirements. 1. No person, firm, or corporation shall remove, relocate, or destroy any heritage tree within the City limits, including an applicant for a Building Permit, without first obtaining a Tree Removal Permit from the Planning Director. 2. No Tree Removal Permit shall be issued for the removal of any heritage tree on any lot associated with a proposal for development, unless all discretionary approvals have been obtained from the City, or unless an emergency waiver is granted pursuant to Subsection 17.16.080.H (Emergency Waiver). 3. No tree designated as a historic landmark shall be altered, removed, relocated, or destroyed by any person, firm, or corporation without first obtaining both a Certificate of Compliance Appropriateness and a Tree Removal Permit. Alternation, removal, relocation, or destruction of trees designated as historic landmarks may require a Certificate of Compliance even if exempt from the requirement for a tree removal permit under this Section. Section 17.16.110 Minor Exceptions A. Purpose. Exceptions may be needed to certain provisions to allow creative design solutions and to accommodate unique site conditions. B. Applicability. A Minor Exception may be granted to modify certain requirements of this Code, as listed in Table 17.16.110-1 (Standards Subject to Exception). Exceptions do not apply to land use and are not intended to waive a specific prohibition or procedural requirement. Additionally, a Minor Exception may be granted for exemptions from development standards for the repurposing or reuse of industrial warehouse and other large footprint buildings for alternative uses not envisioned when the structure was originally built, provided the use satisfies any allowed use and permit requirements provided in Section 17.30.030 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements). • Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P212 TABLE 17.16.110-1 STANDARDS SUBJECT TO EXCEPTION Standard Maximum Reduction or Increase Fence height 2-foot increase Parking or loading spaces— Number required 25% Setbacks (reduction) 10% Maximum lot coverage (increase) 10% Maximum height (increase) 10% C. Review Process. An application for a Minor Exception shall be filed with the Planning Department in a manner prescribed by the Planning Director with the required fee as established by City Council resolution. D. Public Notice. The Planning Director shall, not less than ten (10) days before rendering a decision, provide for public comment through notice to adjacent property owners of the pending application. E. Findings. The Planning Director shall approve or approve with conditions, an application for an exception after finding all of the following. If the Planning Director does not make all of these findings, he/she shall deny the Minor Exception. 1. The proposed development is of sufficient size and is designed so as to provide a desirable environment within its own boundariesThe Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. 2. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. 3. - - - - - - -- -•--- - - space, protection of natural resources, improved pedestr4an connectivity, public plazas). The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. 4. The Ggranting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health. safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. adversely affect the interests of the public or the interests of residents and property owners in the vicinity of the premises in question. 5.The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P213 6.The exception is the minimum required in that it allows the specified improvement F. Conditions. In approving a Minor Exception, the Director may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings required, as well as any performance criteria and development standards contained within this Code. Section 17.16.130 Minor Design Review F. Review Process. 1. An application for a Minor Design Review shall be filed with the Planning Department in a manner prescribed by the Planning Director with the required fee as established by City Council resolution. 2. The Planning Director shall be the approving authority for Minor Design Reviews. The procedure for review and action shall be as provided in this Section. 3.Scheduling for Review. Upon acceptance of a complete application, a project shall be scheduled on the first available agenda for committee reviews. The applicant and any persons requesting notice will be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the meetings. 43. All development proposals submitted pursuant to this Section may be reviewed by the Technical, Design, and Grading Reviewfollowinq committees: (1) Design Review Committee — architecture and site planning; (2) Grading Committee — grading and drainage; and (3) Technical Review • Committee —compliance with technical code requirements. If reviewed by any or all of the aforementioned committees, each committee shall make a recommendation on each project for consideration. 4. Upon acceptance of a complete application, projects subject to Section 17.16.130 F 3 shall be scheduled on the first available agenda for committee reviews: The applicant and any persons requesting notice will be notified at least ten (10) days prior to the meetings. 5. The Design Review Committee shall review the project design submittals and make recommendations to the Planning Director based on: Design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the City's General Plan, design guidelines of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme areas, specific plans, community plan, boulevards, or planned developments. ii. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing, or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P214 hi. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this Section and the General Plan of the City. iv. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and the visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. 6. Grading Committee. The Grading Committee will consider items such as, but not limited to, cut and fill areas, drainage and flood control facilities, erosion control, retaining walls, and the effect of proposed grading on adjacent properties. This committee will determine if the grading plan meets City grading guidelines and policies. The decision of the Grading Committee will be forwarded to the Planning Director and will be based on criteria contained in the City's Hillside Development Regulations, Chapter 17.52 (Hillside Development Standards). 7. Technical Review Committee. Review by this committee will consider items such as, but not limited to, circulation, street improvements, right-of-way dedication, utility easements, grading, drainage facilities, storm drain improvements, California Building Code requirements, security, fire flow, emergency access, location of fire hydrants, water and sewer line connections and sizing, water pressure, permit fees, streetscape and landscape standards, setbacks, parking, and requirements for environmental • processing. The committee will require changes in any development for compliance with adopted codes and standards. The committee may also make recommendations to the Planning Director. Article Ill Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards Chapter 17.30 Allowed Land Use by Base Zoning District • Section 17.30.030 Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements • Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P215 TABLE 17.30.030-1 ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Land J 2 _ _ d v o C. a _ _ Use/Zoning > -� J O Z C7 c� cn v — I C7 = O i U District Residential Uses Adult Day Care P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home Caretaker C C C C C C C P P P N N N N C C C C P C P P Housing Dwelling, Multi N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Family Dwelling, Second Unit (1) P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Dwelling, Single P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Family Dwelling, Two N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Family Emergency N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C N N N N N N Shelter Family Day Care C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N Home, Large Family Day Care P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home, Small Guest House P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Group C C C C C C C C C C C N C N N N N N N C N N Residential Home (2) P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Occupation Live Work N N N N N N P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Manufactured P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home (3) Mobile Home C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Park Residential Care N N N C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Residential Care P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home Single-Room Occupancy N N N P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P216 Land I I l I Use/Zoning j -i I O z C9 v 1 � a 5 = O lie I s District Transitional P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Housing Agriculture and Animal-Related Uses Agricultural Uses N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Animal Keepin/4) P P P PP PP N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Domestic Pets Animal Keeping(4) C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N Exotic Animals Animal Keeping, P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Insects (4) Animal Keeping, Livestock P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Animals (4) Animal Keeping, P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Poultry (4) Equestrian Facility, C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N C C Commercial Equestrian P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility, Hobby Recreation, Resource Preservation,Open Space, Education,and Public Assembly Uses . Assembly Use C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Cemetery/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N Mausoleum Community C C C C C C C C C C C C C N PP N N N C N N Center/Civic Use Community C C C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Garden Convention N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N N Center Golf Course/ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N C C Clubhouse Indoor Amusement/ N N N N N N C N C C P P P N N N N N N N N N Entertainment Facility Indoor Fitness and Sports N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N C Facility- Large - Indoor Fitness and Sports N N N N N N P P P P P C C P C C N N N N N N Facility - Small - Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P217 Land v• Use/Zoning v V U Ccn O = U r o O x District Library and C C C C C C P P P P N P N P C N N N C6 C C6 C6 Museum Outdoor Commercial N N N N N N C C C C N N C C C C N N N N N N Recreation Park and Public P P P P PP P N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Plaza Public Safety C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N C N N Facility Resource- Related P PP P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Recreation School, Academic C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N C N N (Private) School, Academic P P P P PP P P P P P P P P P P N N N P N N (Public) School, College/ University C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N C N N (Private) School, College/ University C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C N N N C N N (Public) Schools, Specialized N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Education and Training/Studio Theaters and N N N N N N C N N C N N P N N N N N N N N N Auditoriums Tutoring Center— N N N N N N C C C C C C C C N N N N N N N N Large Tutoring Center— N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N Small Utility, Transportation, Public Facility,and Communication Uses Broadcasting and Recording N N N N N N N P N P N N N P P P N N N N N N Studios Park and Ride N N N N N N N C C C N N N N P P N N N N N N Facility Parking Facility N N N N N N P P N P C N C P C C C C N N C C Transit Facility N N N N N N J N N N N N N N N C C C C 1 N N NN Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P218 Land J J _ _ v v U n, O a = Use/Zoning > 2 O z t9 c� vn 0 O = 0 = u- District Utility Facility and Infrastructure— N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C C C N C C Fixed Based Structures (5) Utility Facility and Infrastructure— P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Pipelines (5) Wind Energy System — P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Small(1D) Retail, Service, and Office_Uses Adult Day Care N N N N N N C C C C N N N C C C N N N N N N Facility Adult Oriented N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A A A A N N N N Business (6) Alcoholic N N N N N N C N C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Beverage Sales Ambulance N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N C P P N N N N Service Animal Sales and N N N N N N P N P P P P N N N N N N N N N N Grooming Art, Antique, N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Collectable Shop Artisan Shop N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Bail Bonds N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Banks and Financial N N N N N N C C C P P P P P P P N N N N N N Services Bar/Nightclub N N N N N N C C N C C C C C N C N N N N N N Bed and C C C N N N N N N N C C N N N N N N N N N N Breakfast Inn Building Materials Store N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N and Yard Business N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Support Services Call Center N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N 'N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Check Cashing N N N N N N P N P P N N N N P N N N N N N N Business (7) Child Day Care N N N N N N C C C C C N C C C C N N N N N N Facility/Center Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P219 Land J x C7 U o Use/Zonin 9 J J a O z o to O U O = O x v . District Consignment N N N N N N C N C C N C N N N N N N N N N N Store Convenience N N N N N N P N P P N C N N C C N N N N N N Store Crematory N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N Services f') Drive-In and Drive Through N N N N N N C C C C C N C C C C N N N N N N Sales and Service (a) Equipment Sales N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C P P N N N N and Rental Feed and Tack N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N N N N N N N Store Furniture, Furnishing, and N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Appliance Store Garden Center/Plant N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N P N P P N P P Nursery Grocery Store/ N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N N N N N N N N Supermarket Gun Sales N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N C N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Home Improvement N N N N N N P N P P P N P N C P N N N N N N Supply Store Hotel and Motel N N N N N N P C N P N N C C P N N N N N N N Internet Cafe N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N Kennel, N N N N N N N N N C C N C N C C N N N N N N Commercial Liquor Store N N N N N N C N C C C C C N C C N N N N N N Maintenance and Repair, Small N N N N N N P N P P P N P P N P P C N N N N Equipment Massage N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Establishment Medical Marijuana N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Dispensary Medical Services, N C C C C C C P N P P N N P P P N N N N N N Extended Care Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P220 i Land ti ) � C O ? cr Use/Zoning >J n 9 1 O uv- n U O District Medical Services, N N N N N N P P PP P P P P P N N N N N N General — Medical Services, N N C C C C C C N C N N N N P P N N N N N N Hospitals Mobile Hot Food N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Truck Mortuary/Funeral N N N N N N N C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N Home Office, Business N N N N N N P P PP P P P P P P N N N N N N and Professional Office, Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Pawnshop (7) N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Personal N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N N Services Restaurant, No N N N N N N P P PP PP P P P P N N N N N N Liquor Service Restaurant, Beer N N N N N N P P PP PP PP P P N N N N N N and Wine Restaurant, Full N N N N N N C C C C C C C C C C N N N N N N Liquor Service Retail, Accessory N N N N N N P P P P P N P P C C N N N N N N Retail, General N N N N N N P N P P PP P N C C N N N N N N Retail, N N N N N N P N N P P N P N P N N N N N N N Warehouse Club Secondhand N N N N N N P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N N Dealer Shooting Range N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N Smoke Shop (7) N N N N N N N N N C C N C N N N N N N N N N Specialty Food N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N Store Tattoo Shop(7) N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N N N N N N N N Thrift Store(7) N N N N N N C N C C C N C N N N N N N N N N Veterinary C N N N N N C N P P C C C N N P P P N N N N Facility Automobile and Vehicle Uses Auto Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Dismantling Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N C N C N N P N C C N N N N N N Sales and Rental Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P221 Land J x o. v v v U v O = cn U v Use/Zoning 51 ! E i m g O z C7 v cn U a O = O x District Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N N N N N N N Autobroker Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P N N N N N N Sales, Wholesale Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Storage Auto Parts Sales N N N N N N N N P P N N P N N N N N N N N N Car Washing and N N N N N N N C C C C N C N N N N N N N N N Detailing Recreational N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Vehicle Storage Service Stations N N N N N N C C C P C N C C C C N N 1 N N N N Vehicle Services, N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N P P P N N N N Major Vehicle Services, N N N N N N N C C P N N C N P P N N N N N N Minor - Industrial, Manufacturing, and Processing Uses Fuel Storage and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N NN Distribution Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Custom Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N N N Heavy Manufacturing, Heavy-Minimum N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Impact Manufacturin Light g' N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Manufact9 ring, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P P N N N N Medium Printing and N N N N N N N N N P N N N N P P N N N N N N Publishing Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N P P P N N N N Collection Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Processing Recycling Facility, Scrap N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N and Dismantling Facility Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P222 Land !J 2 x U . U U U U 0 0. l — _ N ce U U Use/Zoning > J ,J . C7_ g O Z V U) U — O = O = v_ M District Research and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N Development Storage, Personal Storage N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C C N N N N Facility Storage N N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C C C N N N N Warehouse Storage Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C P P N N N N Distribution — Heavy Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P 1 P P P N N N N Distribution — Light Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Distribution — Medium (9) Table Notes: (1) See additional regulations for second dwelling units in Chapter 17.100. (2) See additional regulations for home occupations in Chapter 17.92. (3) See additional regulations for mobile homes in Chapter 17.96. (4) See Additional regulations for animal keeping in Chapter 17.88. (5) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (6) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.86. Adult-oriented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.102. (8) See additional regulations for drive-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.90. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property. (10) See additional regulations for wind energy systems in Chapter 17.76. (11) Family Day Care Home-Large requires approval of a Large Family Day Care Permit. not a Conditional Use Permit. Section 17.30.040 Other Allowed Use Provisions In addition to the allowed use provisions listed in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District), additional allowed use provisions are described in the following articles and chapters of this Title. D-A. Specific Use Requirements. Article V (Specific Use Requirements) identifies several use types that have special land use and/or development requirements. Some of these use types have special requirements or regulations established by state or federal law and others have special requirements based on local issues, priorities, and preferences. Use regulations in Article V are intended to supplement the allowed use regulations in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District). Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P223 B. Outdoor Sales and Operations. Unless permitted by definition in Chapter 17.32 (Allowed Use Descriptions) or permitted as a temporary use with an approved permit in Chapter 17.104 (Temporary Uses), all business shall be conducted within an enclosed building. &C. Temporary Uses. In addition to the permanent land use listings in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District), Chapter 17.104 (Temporary Uses) establishes regulations for uses that are temporary in nature. Chapter 17.32 Allowed Use Descriptions Section 17.32.020 Allowed Use Descriptions A. Residential Uses. 12. Home Occupation. The conduct of a business within a dwelling unit or residential site, employing occupants of the dwelling, with the business activity being subordinate to the residential use of the property. Examples include, but are not limited to, accountants and financial advisors, architects, artists, attorneys, offices for construction businesses (no equipment or material storage), and real estate sales. This category includes cottage food uses, consistent with State Law. 16. Residential Care Facility. Consistent with the definitions of state law, a residential care facility provides 24-hour nonmedical care for more than six or more persons 18 years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life-threatening illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual. This classification includes, but is not limited to, rest homes, residential care facilities for the elderly, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other facilities licensed by the State of California. Convalescent homes, nursing homes, and similar facilities providing medical care are included under the definition of Medical Services, Extended Care. 17. Residential Care Home. Consistent with the definitions of state law (Health and Safety Code §1502), a residential care home is a home that provides.24 hour nonmedical care for six or fewer persons 18 years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life-threatening illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living, or for the protection of the individual. This classification includes rest homes, residential care facilities for the elderly, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other. facilities licensed by the State of California.. Convalescent homes, nursing homes, and similar facilities providing medical care are included under the definition of Medical Services, Extended Care. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P224 B. Agriculture and Animal-Related Uses. 1. Agricultural Uses. This use category includes farms, orchards, vineyards, livestock grazing, and hydroponics, including on-site sales of products grown on site. 2. Animal Keeping. Care and maintenance of animals on private property. The listing below provides a distinction between various types of animals related to allowed use provisions in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District). This classification is distinct from Animal Sales and Grooming, and Equestrian Facility (commercial or hobby). Also see Kennel, Commercial, which provides for the boarding of animals (e.g., doggie day-care). a. Domestic pets. Small animals (no larger than the largest breed of dogs) customarily kept as pets within a dwelling unit. This classification includes dogs, cats, fish, and birds (excluding large tropical birds and poultry). b. Exotic animals. Wild animals not customarily confined or cultivated by man for domestic or commercial purposes, but kept as a pet or for display, including wolf-dog hybrids, potbelly pigs, non-poisonous snakes, reptiles, and large tropical birds (including peacocks). c. Insects. Small arthropod animals confined or cultivated by man for domestic purposes including but not limited to flies, crickets, mosquitoes, beetles, butterflies, and bees. d. Livestock animals. Domesticated animals that may be kept or raised in pens, barns, houses, and pastures for private use. Livestock includes, but is not limited to, cattle, sheep, swine, goats, and equine. e. Poultry. Domesticated birds (fowl) customarily kept for eggs or meat for personal consumption. This classification includes chickens, roosters, ducks, geese, turkeys, guinea fowl, and Cornish game hens. Chapter 17.36 Development Standards by Base Zoning District Section 17.36.010 Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts TABLE 17.36.010-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard! VL L LM MH Zoning District M H Lot Area (minimum) 20,000 sf 7.200 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac(1) 3 ac (1) 3 ac (1) Lot Area (minimum net avg) 22,500 sf 8,000 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac(1) 3 ac(1) 3 ac (1) Lot Width (minimum) 90 ft(2) 65 ft(2) 50 ft(2) n/a n/a n/a Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P225 Development Standard/ VL L LM M MH H Zoning District Lot Width (corner lot) 100 ft 70 ft 50 ft n/a n/a n/a Lot Depth (minimum) 200 ft 100 ft 90 ft n/a n/a n/a Minimum Frontage 50 ft 40 ft 30 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Minimum Frontage (flag lot) 30 ft 20 ft 20 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft Allowed Density (dwelling units per acre) Minimum Density(3) n/a n/a 4 du/ac 8 du/ac 14 du/ac 24 du/ac Maximum Density 2 du/ac 4 du/ac 8 du/ac(4) 14 du/ac (4) 24 du/ac 30 du/ac Minimum Setback Front Yard (5) 42 ft(6) 37 ft(6) ] 32 ft(6) 37 ft(6) n/a n/a Corner Side Yard (5) 27 ft 27 ft 22 ft 27 ft n/a n/a Interior Side Yard (5) 10/15 ft 5/10 ft 5/10 ft 10 ft(7) n/a n/a Rear Yard (5) 60 ft 20 ft 15 ft 10 ft(7) n/a n/a At Interior Site Boundary (Dwelling/Accessory NR (B) 15/5 (7) 15/5 (7) 15/5 (7) Building) Building Height(maximum in feet) (9) _ - Primary Buildings 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft(10) 40 ft (10) 55 ft(10) Lot Coverage (maximum lot coverage with buildings as a percentage of the parcel or project).: Lot Coverage I 25% 40% I 50% 50% 50% 50% Open Space Requirement(minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Private Open Space 300/150 sf 225/150 sf 150/100 sf 150/100 sf (Ground Floor/Upper Story) Open Space (Private and 654 60% 40% 35% 35% 35% Common) Minimum Patio/Porch Depth 6 ft(11) 6 f(11) 6 ft(t1) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) 6 ft(11) Minimum Dwelling Unit Size (12) Single-Family 1,000 sf (attached and detached) Multi-Family (13) y 550 sf Efficiency/Studio Multi-Family (13) €fficiency/StudieOne 650 sf Bedroom Multi-Family (13) 800 sf 9neTwo Bedroom Three or More Bedrooms 950 sf Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P226 Development Standard! VL ! L LM M MH H Zoning District Distance Between Building/Structure Fronts t8) (14)(minimum) - Between buildings with no patio 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft or recessed patio Between patio fence/wall less 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft than 5 feet in height Between patio fence/wall more 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft than 5 feet in height Between balconies above patio fence/wall more than 5 feet in — — 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft height Between a patio fence/wall and 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft a building wall With common patio fence/wall — — 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft 30 ft Other Miscellaneous Building Setback Requirements (8) (minimum) . Building to one-story detached garage/carport or other 6 ft/15 ft 15 ft 15 15 accessory structure • Building to wall or curb at 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft 20 ft project entry Table Notes: (1) On existing lots of record,parcels less than 3 acres or less than the required minimum frontage may only be developed at the lowest end of the permitted density range. (2) Average width, which shall vary accordingly: VL-+/- 10 feet L&LM-+/-5 feet (3) Excluding land necessary for secondary streets and arterials and in hillside areas shall be dependent on the slope/capacity factor contained in Chapter 17.52(Hillside Development Standards). (4) Developing multi-family in the LM district and single-family in the M district at the maximum density requires compliance with Standards for Higher Residential Densities as outlined in Subsection 17.36.0120.D. (5) Setbacks are measured between the structure and curb face in front yards and corner side yards. Setbacks are measured between the structure and property line in rear yards and interior side yards. (6) Front yard setbacks in new residential developments may be reduced by up to 5 feet to allow for variation in structural setbacks along the street. (7) Add 10 feet if adjacent to VL, L, or LM district. (8) Applies to buildings two stories and taller in height.Add 10 more feet for each story over two stories. (9) In hillside areas, heights shall be limited to 30 feet. (10) Limit one story within 100 feet of VL or L district for multiple-family dwellings. (11) Free and clear of obstructions. (12) Senior citizen projects are exempted from this requirement. (13) To assure that smaller units are not concentrated in any one area or project, the following percentage limitations of the total number of units shall apply: 10%for efficiency/studio and 35%for one bedroom or up to 35%combined. Subject to a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission may authorize a greater ratio of efficiency or one-bedroom units when a development exhibits innovative design qualities and a balanced mix of unit sizes and types. (14) "Front"is defined as the face of the building or unit with the major glass area and/or major recreation area and may include access to that private recreation area. This access may or may not relate to the primary entrance to the building that faces the street or drive;therefore, some buildings may have more than one front. E. Recreation Area/Facility. Where required, in the M, MH, and H residential districts, the developer shall provide recreational amenities in conjunction with common open space as follows: 1. Development consisting of thirty (30) units or less shall provide three (3) of the following recreational amenities: Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P227 a. Large open lawn area; one of the dimensions shall be a minimum of fifty feet (50'). b. Enclosed tot lot with multiple play equipment. c. Spa or pool. d. Barbecue facility equipped with grill, picnic benches, etc. 2. Development consisting of thirty-one (31) units to one hundred (100) units shall provide another set of recreational amenities as described in Subsection 17.122.040.M.1 above, or equivalent, as approved by the Planning Commission. 3. Development consisting of one hundred and one (101) units to two hundred (200) units shall provide five (5) of the following recreational amenities, or equivalent, as approved by the Planning Commission: a. Large open lawn; one of the dimensions shall be a minimum of one hundred feet (100'). b. Multiple enclosed tot lots with multiple play equipment. The tot lots shall be conveniently located throughout the site. The number of tot lots and their location shall be subject to Planning Commission review and approval. c. Pool and spa. d. Community multipurpose room equipped with kitchen, defined areas for games, exercises, etc. e. Barbecue facilities equipped with multiple grills, picnic benches, etc. The barbecue facilities shall be conveniently located throughout the site. The number of barbecue facilities and their locations shall be subject to Planning Commission review and approval. • f. Court facilities (e.g., tennis, volleyball, basketball). q. Jogging/walking trails with exercise stations. 4. For each one hundred (100) units above the first two hundred (200) units, another set of recreational amenities as described in Subsection 17.122.040M.3 above shall be provided. 5. Other recreational amenities not listed above may be considered subject to Planning Commission review and approval. 6. Related recreational activities may be grouped together and located at any one area of the common open space. 7. Dispersal of recreational facilities throughout the site shall be required for development with multiple recreational facilities. • Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P228 All recreation areas or facilities required by this Section shall be maintained by private homeowners associations, property owners, or private assessment districts &F. Other Miscellaneous Residential Development Standards. 6. Roofing Materials. All new and existing development within Residential Zoning Districts shall have roofing material made of tile, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles. Other roofing materials such as metal, slate, or the imitation thereof, but not including composition shingles, may be approved by the approval authority if it is determined that the roof material enhances the building design. Any replacement of existing roofing materials shall be consistent with the existing material or upgraded to a higher quality roofing material. For example, a composition shingle roof can be replaced with composition shingles or can be upgraded to higher quality roofing material such as tile or slate. 7. Slope Planting. Slope banks 5 feet or greater in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate groundcover for erosion control. Slope banks 5 feet or greater in vertical height and of 2:1 or. greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 square feet of slope area, one 1-gallon or larger size shrub for each 100 square feet of slope area, and appropriate groundcover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include•one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 square feet of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. Maintenance by a Homeowners' Association may be required by the Planning Commission on a case-by-case basis. Section 17.36.040 Development Standards for Industrial Districts D. Other Miscellaneous Industrial Development Standards. • 1. Special Streetscape. Future development and redevelopment within industrial areas shall be consistent with the special streetscape standards listed in Table 17.36.040-2 (Streetscape Setback Requirements) and as depicted in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). 2. Special Building Height Standards. Building height limits shall not exceed the height limits prescribed in the LA/Ontario International Airport Compatibility Plan. For areas within the High Terrain Zone, the building height limit shall be seventy feet (70'). Buildings or structures greater than seventy feet (70') in height within the High Terrain Zone are subject to the ONT-IAC Project Notification Process and require a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) exception (Obstruction Evaluation - Form 7460). In cases where the LA/Ontario International Airport Compatibility Plan permits heights greater Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P229 than seventy feet (70'), building height limits shall be limited to maximum of height of seventy-five feet (75'), unless a Conditional Use Permit is granted permitting heights greater than seventy-five feet (75'). 3. Special Height Exceptions for Ancillary Equipment. Within the Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) and Heavy Industrial (HI) Districts, height exceptions may be granted for ancillary equipment with special design and landscape considerations as follows: a. Maximum 90 feet with approval of a Minor Exception with the additional findings that the ancillary equipment is designed in a manner that integrates well within the subject site and existing and/or proposed landscaping will buffer the views of ancillary equipment from designated view corridors. b. Maximum 120 feet with approval of a Conditional Use Permit with the additional findings with the additional findings that the ancillary equipment is designed in a manner that integrates well within the subject site and existing and/or proposed landscaping will buffer the views of ancillary equipment from designated view corridors. TABLE 17.36.040-2 STREETSCAPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Average Depth of Street Type jz,3,a� (5) yp e Landscape t�.z� Building Setback Parking Setback Major Arterial & Special 45 ft 45 ft 25 ft Boulevard Secondary 35 ft 35 ft 20 ft Local/Collector 25 ft 25 ft 15 ft Table Notes: (1) The average depth shall be uninterrupted from the face of curb, except for sidewalks, pedestrian hardscape, plazas and courtyards, and monument signs. (2) Parcels less than 225 feet in depth from the ultimate curb face on special boulevards are not required to provide an average depth of landscaping or building setback greater than 25 feet or 20% the depth of the property, whichever is greater. (3) As determined from ultimate face of curb. (4) Average depth of landscaping must still be provided. (5) Street frontage walls and fences over 3 feet in height are subject to building setbacks. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P230 Article IV Site Development Provisions Chapter 17.42 Accessory Structures Section 17.42.030 Permit Requirements and Exemptions C. Exempt Structures. The following accessory structures are exempt from planning entitlements provided they comply with listed requirements. Exempt accessory structures may require Building Permits in keeping with the California Building Code adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and placed in accordance with Table 17.42.040-1 (Development Standards for Accessory Structures). 1. All accessory structures that are less than one hundred twenty (120') square feet in size with no portion of the structure equal to or greater than six feet (6') in height. 2. Water features. A detached structure typically used for decorative or landscape design purposes such as a fountain, water wall, bird bath and similar features that are less than one hundred twenty (120') square feet in size with no portion of the feature equal to or greater than six feet (6') in height. 3. Play Equipment. Structures and surfaces used for recreational purposes including play structures, tree houses, jungle gyms, and non-illuminated sports courts such as tennis and basketball courts. 4. Deck/Patio. A detached porch or platform that is generally constructed with wood, concrete or stone that is above the grade or located over a basement or story below. 5. Pool/Spa. Any structure intended for swimming or recreational bathing. Swimming pool includes in-ground and above-ground structures and includes, but is not limited to, hot tubs, spas, portable spas, and non-portable wading pools. 6. Pool Accessories. Any structure required to properly operate the pool or for entertainment or relaxation value, including but not limited to poel-mss heaters, filtercdiving boards, slides, and grottos. 7. Outdoor Entertaining Features. Structures used for entertainment and outdoor cooking such as built-in barbecues and fire pits. 8. Temporary, Portable Shade Structures. Shelters used for the storage of vehicles, recreational vehicles, trailers, boats, self propelled equipment and bulky items designed to be portable and/or collapsible constructed of canvas, vinyl, aluminum, wood, or similar materials. P231 o v o v a a O L O u Y E co v o U tn_ C0 (O C0 = (13 N N al o a w Cu In C C `C c .— .u„ 0 a L u .c a a+ 03 sti L. (6 c0 CD co a, R) RS co ca o o ar }-a P P T2 P iti o a Q, co f9 Q) >, >. T A a) v C '� v, W CL t 2 2 2 N .,, a, E O O 7 3 7 a v C\ - A m = 0 or a- o- a- a s °' v v E a) m C) a) a) C o a U k o ._ o 0 0 ° a '� o c c D CD 0 c i 0 E L a Q, •CD ce c) (`0 c) C) N N O C, a v .; U 'a I- () C C co co C C C (h .c N .c a p, U) " L .L.. ` a O .c L o a U } O U v O O - E E E E E E E 3 ac v n a, U)) E2 E E E E E E 3 c, v ° c u ` a W C 3 v v 'C 'C 'C c c c v c ;� N U C.) am o - o - o - Q zE zE zE zE zE zE E { vC) 0 v +- .c ° c, a N E 0 0 3 Ni `^ c u O Ou - 2 v zl a = u v M a c, U >. C, U o 3 } -0 -0 -v -o -0 a -0 a a L c CL, -1-� ... a) a) m a) a) a) a v a a o o L tri C y 0 :Q .-. ., w a ,C a .c at L 0 C Z w E E E E E E j E a cam' E ya co a) a) a) ) m a) Cr) 0 E c, ° Q �n ` d a s a v a a a E a o �, .., 3 - � o � ; O CO p _c 0 0 0 0 0 0 o b 3 .o a, q a $ CD Z ,� . Cl) Z Z Z up Z z z E z v N Q. v o ° 19, .....s.' c W V a ar h U O v a .CO ai a -Lou rn ° z 3 s ° nL, O ( _ - -A t b o a n, y U Cr) U1 C a •S o c ti 0 ,E ; ; o o E p 0 u u) IC ir) U) o a ° -0 O o L O H ..-cl—ci 0,U G 2 In u) CO to to 10 U) Un u) } c o o N O +., CU -p E A Z CL, 0 0 c, u w a _C '� ID n a o o a v . u o �o V i a) a) E a) a) a) a) a) a) U) -a co an •a " o v E .. • = Q �a c c a m o a �(o/ J O E E E E E E E -d a, 1 L i a LL CO ` N 0) C a) U) 4) a) N Q) O Q, 3 V v) p +L.. a a E a a a a a a .c cO k '0 a > 0, , Ln H O O O O O O O O O a u v +r o:to z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z v o E °�' 3 U >. c c -a a 0 v) O fl E z) E 1 o v o •> a 7 7 C O E Q a u .�.. Ou .L., a Q) �' >, o o � d N a 0 o E v v+ m H C cn a) -z o c'■ t a N .�. O L 3 U O CL, O •�n u 0 .>. i O c O `., 3 > • 4N) cn Ea o W E '= v u `n ¢`, oL, v .� O V r O O f4 m a) .,, L".`� h w u ,. C, r L u p, m0 QL I CC Ii ,°� 0 C a o (D o � oZ oQ � ti0L° QF=eL N 12 O O O O >- U CO E m v (I) O U) 0 5 n.. d a 0 0 H Cl) - -- -, P232 \ U CU O -42 CU to t CD N \ � \ IL W f -c / 0 { ® { E O j.'" . 0 0 co CI ! . \ j Cu E t. _ — E § \ \ / } = Q { ( ` � 2 vu /{ %o 3 \ \ \ \@ ] ).@ { / , \ \ j • _ CK \ & B : / / / ) / E ± E ) @m Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P233 Chapter 17.56 Landscaping Standards Section 17.56.050 General Landscape Development Standards D. Synthetic Turf. Synthetic turf may be used as a substitute for natural turf for the purposes of water conservation. The following standards shall apply to the use and maintenance of synthetic turf: 1. Synthetic turf shall consist of lifelike individual blades of grass that emulate real grass in look and color and have a minimum pile height of 1-1/2 inches. 2. A proper drainage system shall be installed underneath to prevent excess runoff or pooling of water. 3. Synthetic turf shall be installed and maintained to effectively simulate the appearance of a well-maintained lawn. 4. The use of indoor or outdoor plastic or nylon carpeting as a replacement for synthetic turf or natural turf shall be prohibited. 5. Synthetic turf shall be installed in combination with natural plant materials (e.g. trees, shrubs and groundcover) to enhance the overall landscaping design. DTE. Water Efficiency. If applicable, projects are required to comply with provisions within Chapter 17.82 (Water Efficient Landscaping) of this Article. Chapter 17.58 Outdoor Lighting Standards Section 17.58.050 General Lighting Requirements D. Sports Fields/Outdoor Activity Areas. Where playing fields or other specialty activity areas are to be illuminated, lighting fixtures shall be mounted, aimed, and shielded so that the light falls within the primary playing area and no significant off- site light trespass is produced. Additionally, the lights shall be turned off within one hour after the end of the event. E. Wireless Telecommunication Facilities. Wireless telecommunication facilities and related equipment shall be unlit except as provided in Chapter 17.106 (Wireless Communicator Facilities). F. Maximum Height of Freestanding Outdoor Light Fixtures. The maximum height of outdoor light fixtures on residential properties shall be twelve feet (12'). The maximum height of freestanding outdoor light fixtures abutting residential development shall be fifteen feet (15'). Otherwise, the maximum height for freestanding outdoor light structures shall be twenty feet (20'). Height shall be measured from the finish grade, inclusive of the pedestal, to the top of the fixture. See Figure 17.58.050-2 (Shielding and Maximum Height of Freestanding Outdoor Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P234 Light Fixtures). Height limit for light fixtures in industrial areas is 25 feet. The height of all outdoor light fixtures is measured from ground level to top of illumination fixture and does not include decorative elements attached to the top of the fixture. Chapter 17.64 Parking and Loading Standards Section 17.64.040 General Parking and Loading Requirements • B. Parking Space and Drive Aisle Dimensions. 1. When outdoors (e.g., parking lot), each parking space shall have a minimum size of nine feet (9') by seventeen feet (17') with a required one foot (1') overhang (e.g., over a curb stop) and shall be free of obstructions such as columns or walls. 2. When Indoors or under a shelter (e.g. parking structure or carport/shade structure), each parking space shall be ten feet (10') by twenty feet (20') where columns or walls are located within the parking area. 3. Each loading berth shall be a minimum size of twelve feet (12') by thirty feet (30') whether indoors or outdoors. 4. When garage parking is required, parking spaces shall be designed in a side by side configuration with a minimum dimension of 10 feet wide by 20 feet deep for each required parking space free and clear of obstructions. If tandem parking is provided, only one space will count toward the minimum parking requirements. • Section 17.64.080 Parking and Driveway Design and Development A. Surface Parking Area. All surface parking areas shall have the following improvements: 1. Each required parking space and aisle, shall be graded, drained, and surfaced so as to prevent dust, mud, or standing water and shall be identified by pavement markings, wheel stops, entrance and exit signing, and directional signs, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. All new parking spaces shall be painted with double stripe pavement markings. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P235 Chapter 17.68 Property Maintenance Section 17.68.030 Vehicle Parking Limitation in Residential Areas I. No trailer, semi-trailer, boat, or portable recreational equipment (e.g. jet skis or snowmobiles) shall be parked or stored within the front yard, corner side yard, or • side yard abutting a street unless (1) it is not a commercial vehicle and is parked for a temporary period of time not to exceed forty-eightseventy-two (4872) hours; (2) it is involved in loading or unloading activity; and (3) it is parked in compliance with any other applicable City ordinance. Section 17.68.060 Recreation Vehicle Parking and Storage The parking and storage of recreational vehicles on residential properties, in all residential districts, shall be subject to the provisions of this Section. A. Recreational Vehicles Defined. For the purposes of this Section, "recreational vehicles" shall mean a vehicle towed or self-propelled on its own chassis or attached to the chassis of another vehicle with provisions for sleeping, cooking and/or sanitation designed or used for temporary dwelling, recreational, or sporting purposes. Examples include, but shall not be limited to, motor home, converted trucks or busses, travel trailer, fifth wheel, toy hauler, mounted camper, camping trailer, - - - - - -- ", - - - . ---- - - --- - terrain vehicle (side by side), personal watercraft or similar equipment provided that such vehicles are not commercial vehicles or used for commercial purposes. B. Parking Limitation. Recreational vehicle parking shall only be permitted within an enclosed garage, carport, or a similar structure, or if outdoors, in an authorized off- street paved parking area. All other parking or storage shall be prohibited. C. Access. Recreational vehicles shall not be parked in a way to render inaccessible a required garage. D. Authorized Parking Areas. Authorized outdoor parking areas shall be limited to the locations and conditions described below. 1. Recreational vehicles may be parked or stored in side or rear yard areas, provided that such areas are screened from view from the street, public right- of-way, and adjacent properties by a permanent legally constructed and maintained fence, wall, or equivalent screening material at least five feet (5') in height. 2. Recreational vehicle parking areas within side and rear yards shall be limited to five percent (5%) of the total lot area or five hundred (500) square feet, whichever is greater, unless constructed pursuant to an approved Minor Development Review. 3. Recreational vehicles may also be parked within public view in authorized parking areas within the front yard, or corner side yard abutting a street, for temporary periods of time not to exceed forty eightseventy-two (4872) hours, except as noted in Subsection 17.68.060.D.4 below. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P236 4. Time limits established in Subsection 17.68.060.D.3 may be waived for one recreational vehicle or one boat mounted on a trailer on a specific property when all of the following conditions can be demonstrated: Current owner or resident has resided on said property since prior to December 31,1991. ii. Current owner or resident has owned a recreational vehicle since prior to December 31, 1991, while residing on the property. Vi. Property in question cannot reasonably accommodate recreational vehicle storage in the side or rear yard. iv. Recreational vehicle may only be parked or stored on a paved surface located between the driveway and the nearest side property line. v. Property in question is not located within the Planned Communities of Caryn, Terra Vista, or Victoria. E. Portable Recreational Equipment. Authorized parking areas for portable recreational equipment shall be limited to the locations and conditions described below: 1. Portable recreational equipment may be parked or stored within an enclosed garage or within the side or rear yard areas provided that such areas are screened from view from the street, public right of way, and adjacent properties by a permanent legally constructed and maintained fence, wall or equivalent screening material at least five feet (5') in height. 2. Portable recreational equipment may also be parked within the front yard, or corner side yard abutting a street, for temporary periods of time not to exceed seventy-two (72) hours. €F. Parking Area Maintenance. All parking areas within public view from the street, public right-of-way, or adjacent properties shall be surfaced with a permanent paving material. Such areas shall be maintained in good usable condition, free of potholes and•broken sections to prevent the accumulation of mud, dust, and weeds, and shall be kept free of debris, dirt, and other loose materials. RV parking areas shall be keep free of contaminant discharge (oil stains and grease) and any discharge should be cleaned from paved areas immediately to prevent discharge entering the storm drain system. G. Occupancy Prohibited. Recreational Vehicles shall not be used for the purpose of temporary or permanent living, including but not limited to sleeping, cooking, bathing, occupying as a dwelling, or any stay within the Vehicle not directly related to its driving except in a designated public campground or other licensed private camping facility, or in conjunction with an active construction site with a Temporary Use Permit. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P237 Chapter 17.74 Sign Regulations for Private Property Section 17.74.090 Allowed Temporary On-Site Sign Standards This Section describes standards for temporary on-site signs. All temporary signs require a I temporary use-sign permit prior to their establishment. Temporary signs may include, but are not limited to, commercial signs for grand openings or for special product, sale, or event advertising. All temporary signs must comply with the standards listed. in Table 17.74.090-1 (Allowed Temporary On-Site Sign Standards) and are subject to the following: Article V Specific Use Requirements Chapter 17.86 Adult Business Uses Section 17.86.030 Permit Requirements It shall be unlawful to establish or operate, or cause or permit to be operated, any adult entertainment establishment without first obtaining an adult entertainment zoning permit from the Planning Director Commission consistent with requirements of Chapter 17.14 (General Application Processing Procedures) and Chapter 17.201-6 (Pcrmits and Entitlements Decided by Planning Commission Decisions). Chapter 17.92 Home Occupations Section 17.92.030 Development Standards All home occupations shall comply with the following development standards: A. Incidental Use by Nature. The use of the dwelling as a home occupation shall be clearly incidental and . subordinate to its use for residential purposes by its inhabitants. Not more than fifteen percent (15%) of the total square footage for the dwelling or one room of the dwelling, whichever is less, shall be used for the home occupation. B. Employees. No persons, other than members of the family who reside on the premises, shall be engaged in the home occupation activity. Off-site employees or partners are not permitted, except for cottage food uses, consistent with State law. C. Exterior Appearance. There shall be no change in the outward appearance of the building or premises, or other visible evidence of the activity. D. Sales. There shall be no sales of products on the premises, except produce (fruit or vegetables) grown on the subject property, or cottage food products. On site sales of produce and cottage food products produced on site shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Off-site sales, including electronic and mail order commerce, is permitted, consistent with the other standards of this Chapter. E. Visitors and Customers. The use shall not allow customers or clientele to visit dwellings unless this activity involves the sale of fruits and produce or cottage food products or is approved by the Planning Director as part of a Home Occupation Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P238 Permit and is determined to fit within the residential character of the area (e.g., piano lessons). F. Operation Standards. No equipment or processes shall be used on the subject property that creates noise, smoke, glare, fumes, odor, vibration, electrical, radio, or television interference disruptive to surrounding properties. G. Accessory Structures. No home occupation shall be conducted in an accessory building. Normal use of the garage may be permitted if.such use does not obstruct required parking. The use shall not involve storage of materials or supplies in an accessory building or outside any structures. H. Deliveries. Deliveries shall not exceed those normally and reasonably occurring for a residence. Deliveries of materials for the home occupation shall not involve the use of commercial vehicles, except for Fed Ex, UPS, or USPS-type home pickups and deliveries. Off-site deliveries, such as to a post office box, are preferred. Signs. No signs shall be displayed in conjunction with the home occupation and there shall be no advertising using the home address. J. Commercial Vehicles. No person shall park or store more than one commercial vehicle or any commercial vehicle over 10,000 pounds licensed gross vehicle weight per dwelling unit. Chapter 17.104 Temporary Uses Section 17.104.040 Standards for Specific Temporary Uses L. Trailer—CoachesRecreational Vehicles or Mobile Homes on Active Construction Sites. These are permitted as a temporary living quarters for security personnel or temporary residence of the subject property owner, subject to the following restrictions: 1. The Planning Director may approve a temporary trailer living quarter for the duration of the construction project or for a specified period, but in no event for more than two (2) years. If exceptional circumstances exist, a one (1) year extension may be granted, provided that the building permit for the first permanent dwelling or structure on the same site has also been extended. • 2. Installation of trailer-ceachesa temporary living quarter may occur only after a valid building permit has been issued. 3. Trailer coachesTemporary living quarters permitted pursuant to this Section shall not exceed a maximum gross square footage of six hundred fifty (650) square feet in size (tongue not included). 4. The trailer coach must have a valid California vehicle license and shall provide evidence of State Division of Housing approval as prescribed in the being defined as a motor home, travel trailer, truck camper, or camping Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P239 trailer, with or without motor power, shall not be permitted pursuant to this Section. 5. The temporary trailer coach installation must meet all requirements and regulations of the Riverside San Bernardino County Department of • Environmental Health Services and the City Building and Safety Department. 6. Any permit issued pursuant to this Section in conjunction with a construction project shall become invalid upon cancellation or completion of the Building Permit for which this use has been approved, or the expiration of the time for which the approval has been granted. At that time, trailers shall be removed from the site. Chapter 17.106 Wireless Communication Facilities Section 17.106.030 Development Criteria A. Screening and Site Selection Guidelines. The following screening and site selection guidelines apply to all wireless communication facilities: 1. Stealth facilities and concealed antennas are preferred. 2. Wireless communication facilities shall be located where the existing topography, vegetation, buildings, or other structures provide the greatest amount of screening. Where insufficient screening exists, applicants shall provide screening satisfactory to the Planning Director, or as otherwise required herein. 3. Ground-mounted wireless communication facilities shall be located only in close proximity to existing aboveground utilities, such as electrical towers or utility poles (which are not scheduled for removal or undergrounding for at least eighteen (18) months after the date of application), light poles, trees of comparable heights, and in areas where they will not detract from the appearance of the city. 4. Wireless communication facilities shall be located in the following order of preference: a. Collocated with existing wireless communication facilities. b. On existing structures such as buildings, communication towers, or utility facilities. c. On an existing signal, power, light, or similar kinds of poles. d. In industrial districts. e. In commercial districts. f. In residential districts, subject to additional restrictions set forth herein. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P24O 5. Major Wireless Communication Facilities are not permitted to locate within three hundred feet (300') of any residential structure, within any residential district, or within three hundred feet (300') of any existing, legally established Major Wireless Communication Facility except as follows: a. When located on any existing nonresidential building or structure or on any existing utility pole provided such location complies with all of the following: i. The collocation is in full compliance with the California Public Utilities Commission Joint Pole Association General Order 95, Rule 94, and any other applicable state or federal regulations; and ii. Existing Major Wireless Communication Facility to be utilized for collocation shall previously be granted with a Conditional Use Permit or a Minor Development Review approval, including modification of an existing Conditional Use Permit or Minor Development Review; and iii. All accessory equipment and enclosures shall be located underground or screened from public view as approved in writing by the Planning Director; and iv. Unless shown in the submitted application documentation to not be technically and/or commercially feasible, all antennas and/or antenna panels shall be flush mounted and limited in number to that amount necessary to achieve the required coverage described in said documentation. b. The proposed facility will replace or modify an existing facility for purposes of collocation. c. The proposed facility will be designed and constructed in a manner to allow for future collocation of an additional wireless communication carrier provided the applicant submits written documentation that shows: i. A more preferable location, as determined by reference to Section 17.106.440030.A 4 cannot be reasonably accommodated by the applicant due to technical requirements of the proposed facility including, but not limited to, coverage requirements imposed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or otherwise by law, or due to other factors beyond the applicant's reasonable control. d. For the purposes of this Chapter, all distances shall be measured in a straight line without regard to intervening structures, from the nearest point of the proposed Major Wireless Communication Facility to the nearest property line of any residential land use, or to the nearest point of another Major Wireless Communication Facility. Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P241 Article VII Design Standards and Guidelines Chapter 17.122 Design Provisions by Development Type Section 17:122.040 Foothill Boulevard This section establishes parameters within which the community character for the entire Foothill Boulevard Corridor can be created. To do so, a number of issues and design concepts have been previously explored. However, at the core of all discussion and investigation has been the attempt to define community character in an accurate, comprehensive, and pragmatic manner. The Community Design Guidelines are primarily focused on the creation of aesthetic character. The purpose is to create a visual environment that evokes a distinctive and unifying image, which is unique to Rancho Cucamonga. To accomplish this task, the Foothill Boulevard Corridor must first distinguish itself from other major thoroughfares in nearby communities and, second, it must serve as a visually unifying concourse that links the entire community of Rancho Cucamonga. Lastly, it is important to have a design statement for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor with each contributing community design element skillfully orchestrated to promote a contiguous, cohesive, community design image. M.Recreation Ar alFacility. Where required, in the M, MH, and H residential districts, the spaceas-feNow 1.Development consisting of thirty (30) units or Ie:r„ shall provide three (3) of the following recreational amenities: • feet (50'). b.Enclosed tot lot with multiple play equipment. d.Barbecue facility equipped with grill, picnic benches, etc. 2.Development consisting of thirty one (31) units to one hundred (100) units shall provide another set of recreational amenities as described in Subsection 17.122.010.M.1 above, or equivalent, as approved by the Planning Commission, a.Largc open lawn; one of the dimensions shall be a minimum of one hundred feet (100'). b.Multiple enclosed tot lots with multiple play equipment. The tot lots shall be conveniently located throughout the site. The number of tot lots and Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P242 their location shall be subject to Planning Commission review and apprevek c.Pool and spa. d.Community multipurpose room equipped with kitchen, defined areas for games, exercises, etc. e.Barbecuc facilities equipped with multiple grills, picnic benches, ctc. The •arbecue facilities shall be conveniently located throughout the site. The number of barbecue facilities and their locations shall be subject to Planning Commiosion review and approval. f.Court facilities (e.g., tennis, volleyball, basketball). g.Jogging/walking trails with exercise stations. '1.For each one hundred (100) units above the first two hundred (200) units, another set of recreational amenities as described in Subsection 17.122.0'0M.3 above shall be provided. 5.Other recreational amenities not listed above may be considered subject to Planning Commission review and approval. &.Related recreational activities may be grouped together and located at any one arpa of the common open space. 7.Dispersal of recreational facilities throughout the site shall be required for Article VIII Glossary Chapter 17.126 Universal Definitions Section 17.126.020 Universal Definitions Lot Coverage. The area of a lot covered by buildings including eaves greater than twenty four (24) inches, projecting balconies, and similar features but excluding ground-level paving, landscaping, open recreational facilities, and lattice patio covers. See Figure 17.126.020-8 (Lot Coverage). Second Dwelling Unit. An attached or detached dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons, with permanent requirements for sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation sited on the same parcel as the primary dwelling unit. This • Proposed Revisions to Rancho Cucamonga Development Code P243 definition includes granny flats, efficiency units and manufactured homes, pursuant to Government Code section 65852 (i)(4). Water Feature. A detached structure typically used for decorative or landscape design purposes such as a fountain, water wall, bird bath and similar features. Vehicle, Recreation. A vehicle towed or self-propelled on its own chassis or attached to the chassis of another vehicle with provisions for sleeping, cooking and/or sanitation and designed or used for temporary dwelling, recreational, or sporting purposes. Examples tinclude, but shall hot be limited to, motor home, travel trailer, fifth wheel, toy hauler, mounted camper, camping trailer, converted trucks and busses, boat, trailer, golf cart, all terrain vehicle, sand buggy, dune buggy, utility terrain vehicle (side by side), personal watercraft or similar equipment. provided that such vehicles are not commercial vehicles or used for commercial purposes. Portable Recreational Equipment. A vehicular unit designed and used for recreational or sporting purposes, but not for temporary dwelling. Examples include, but shall not be limited to boat, trailer, golf cart, all terrain vehicle. sand buggy, dune buggy, utility terrain vehicle (side by side), personal watercraft or similar equipment. Chapter 17.136 Sign Definitions Section 17.136.020 Sign Definitions Linear Frontage. The horizontal distance measured along the building frontage facing the street. In cases where a business has no building frontage facing a street, the building frontage with the primary business entrance shall be considered the primary building frontage (e.g., an entrance facing a courtyard). For multi-tenant buildings, ground floor tenants may have their primary frontage determined independently for the rest of the building based on the aforementioned rules. Addendum to the P244 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report ADDENDUM This Addendum to the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2000061027) (the "EIR") has been prepared in connection with the City's supplemental amendment to the Development Code (the "Project"). The Addendum confirms that the environmental impacts stemming from the Project were adequately addressed in the EIR and that a subsequent EIR or negative declaration is not required for the Project. Proposed Supplemental Development Code Amendments The Project consists of supplemental amendments to the City's recently adopted comprehensive Development Code, which was in turn adopted to implement the policies of the recently completed 2010 General Plan Update. Since adoption of the Development Code update in July 2012, City staff has identified several errors and omissions in the Development Code that were never intended to be part of the Code. The purpose of the Project is to correct these errors and omissions and clarify text where necessary. It is therefore considered to be largely procedural in nature. Table A-1 summarizes the changes proposed in the project and the reason for including into the Development Code. Table A-1: Summary of Proposed Changes to the Development Code 17.14 Clarify the approval authority for Large II Family Day Care Applications and reinstate Omitted in error. 17.16 100 foot noticing requirement Revision needed to text to clarify II 17.14 Clarify the appeal process for Historic that decisions made by the Historic Preservation Commission decisions. Preservation Commission could be appealed to the City Council. Revision needed based on feedback that some of the current II 17.16 Clarify the required findings for a Minor required findings do not Exception. adequately correlate to the types of allowed minor exceptions. Clarify that Minor Design Review Clarification of the language order II 17.16 applications can be referred to for easier understanding and less committees (Grading, Technical and Design Review) if necessary. interpretation. Error in the translation of the Land III 17.30 Allow Medical Services, General allowed as Use table as the definition of a permitted use in the CC District. medical uses was amended in the Development Code in July 2012. Page 1 of 7 ATTACHMENT 2 Addendum to the P245 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report 1:2 ��� Pb �� t��3� � � ,TL+4 Fau�i� i Error in the translation of the Land Allow Indoor Fitness and Sports Facilities— Use table as the definition of III 17.30 Small as a permitted use in the RRC indoor fitness and sports facilities District. was amended in the Development Code in July 2012. Error in the translation of the Land Allow Indoor Fitness and Sports Facilities, Use table as the definition of III 17.30 Large as a conditionally permitted use in indoor fitness and sports facilities the RRC District. was amended in the Development Code in July 2012. Add a footnote to Family Day Care Home, III 17.30 Large to clarify the use requires a Large Technical clarification. Family Day Care Permit, not a Conditional Use Permit III 17.30 Require business to be conducted within Omitted in error. an enclosed building. III 17.32 Amend definition of Home Occupation to Required by State law (AB 1616). include cottage food uses. Amend the definition of Residential Care Technical clarification to avoid Ill 17.32 Facility to include the care for more than conflict with the definition of six people. Residential Care Homes. Amend the definition of Animal Keeping to Clarification to prevent poultry III 17.32 clarify poultry keeping. keeping in residential zones for commercial egg production. Revise the minimum square footage Technical error. The original III 17.36 requirements for multi-family dwelling residential development standards units. table was recreated incorrectly. Technical error. These standards III 17.36 Delete the private open space are required for multi-family requirement for VL and L zones. developments, which are not allowed in these zones. III 17.36 Reinstate requirements for slope planting Omitted in error. in rear yards. Omitted in error. Local and Re-label "local" streets on Table collector streets have the same III 17.36 17.36.040-2 to "local/collector" for streetscape setback requirements, streetscape setback requirements. but collector streets are not listed on the table. Page 2 of 7 Addendum to the P246 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Modification to allow accessory Incorporate height exceptions for ancillary equipment necessary for III 17.36 equipment in MI/HI and HI districts with development to be permitted with discretionary permits. discretionary review and conditions of approval. Reincorporate standards for pool equipment and outdoor entertainment IV 17.42 features to be located within the side and Omitted in error. rear yard setbacks. Reinstate development standards for IV 17.56 Omitted in error. synthetic turf. Reinstate lighting standards for outdoor IV 17.58 Omitted in error. recreation courts on residential properties Reinstate minimum garage size IV 17.64 requirements, double striping of parking Omitted in error and a clarification stalls and clarify the use of tandem of past practice. parking. Clarification needed for Clarify regulations for the parking, storage consistency with other parking IV 17.68 and use of recreational vehicles within regulations and to better assist residential areas. code enforcement. Rename Adult Entertainment Zoning Technical change to be consistent Permit and clarify the approval authority is V 17.86 the Planning Commission, not the Planning with text in Chapters 17.14 and Director. 17.20.020. Amend home occupation use Amended as required by State law V 17.92 requirements to allow cottage food uses (AB 1616). within residential properties. Addition required for clarity in VIII 17.126 Add definitions for Second Dwelling Unit administration of the and Portable Recreation Equipment. Development Code. Modification to prevent eaves VIII 17.126 Modify the definition of Lot Coverage to from being counted toward lot include only eaves greater than 24 inches. coverage. VIII 17.126 Modify the definition of Recreational Modification required to be Vehicle. consistent with Chapter 17.68. Add a definition and graphic for Linear Addition required for clarity in VIII 17.136 calculating linear frontage for sign Frontage. area. The Project will not affect the current methods of conducting environmental review for new development applications. Page 3 of 7 Addendum to the P247 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report The 2010 General Plan Update and Environmental Impact Report On May 19, 2010, the City Council adopted the 2010 General Plan Update and certified the EIR. The updated plan serves as the foundation for many of the City's regulatory documents, including the Development Code, specific plans, community plans, master plans, and design guidelines. With the 2010 General Plan Update, the City's focus shifted to infill development (development of remaining vacant properties within developed business districts and residential neighborhoods). The EIR evaluated potential for the 2010 General Plan Update to result in environmental impacts, as summarized in the following table: No Mitigation Mitigation Measures Significant and Unavoidable Agricultural Resources . Cultural Resources Aesthetics Biological Resources Hazards and Hazardous Agricultural Resources Geology and Soils Materials Air Quality Population, Housing and Hydrology and Water Quality Climate Change Employment Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Public Services Noise Parks and Recreation Transportation and Traffic Utilities and Service Systems The City made findings regarding the environmental impacts of adopting the General Plan as well as overriding considerations for significant and unavoidable impacts, both individually and cumulatively, for the following issues: Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change, and Mineral Resources.. The findings made by the City necessary to certify the EIR and adopt the General Plan also included a mitigation monitoring and reporting program. For impacts to Land Use and Planning, the City determined that changes or alterations have been incorporated into the General Plan that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR resulting in a less than significant impact. More specifically the City's findings stated there would be no conflict between the General Plan and the land development code because updates to the land development code, as well as adherence to standard conditions related to consistency of future development with the proposed 2010 General Plan Update and the City's Development Code, will reduce the potential impacts related to plan consistency to a less than significant level. CEQA Review Requirements The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") generally requires agencies to analyze the possible environmental impacts of a project prior to approval. Depending on the nature and extent of the potential impacts, the agency may be required to adopt a negative declaration or environmental impact report (EIR). Page 4 of 7 Addendum to the P248 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Under Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, when an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous FIR; c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative;or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. If the none of these conditions calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration are met, but minor technical changes or additions are necessary to a previously adopted environmental document are needed, Section 16164 of the CEQA Guidelines allow the lead agency to prepare an addendum to the prior environmental document. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant should be included in the addendum, the lead agency's findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. The addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EIR or adopted negative declaration, and must be considered by the decision-making body prior to making a decision on the project. Page 5 of 7 Addendum to the P249 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report Analysis This addendum to the EIR has been prepared for the Project because none of the conditions specified in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines requiring the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration are met. • First, the Project does not propose substantial changes in the City's development regulations that were not analyzed in the EIR or that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The Project simply implements the goals and policies adopted in the City's General Plan and analyzed in the General Plan EIR. The General Plan specifically mentions revises and updating the Development Code, as shown in the following table. The Development Code shall be updated to reflect the density and LU-2.1, LU-2.2, LU-3.3, LU- intensity ranges (especially along Foothill Boulevard) as specified in 3.8, LU-4.2, LU-4.3, LU-4.5, the General Plan including updating the development standards to LU-5.1, LU-9.5, ED-2.1, ED- be consistent with the General Plan provisions. (Table LU-2 of 2.4 ED-4.4 Chapter 2) The Development Code shall be updated to develop guidelines or LU-2.4, LU-9.1, LU-9.2, LU- standards that will guide infill development and make it compatible 9.4, ED-1.4, ED-4.1 with the surrounding neighborhood communities The proposed project does not change either the policies or the figures shown in both the EIR and the General Plan. The project does not change any densities, intensities, land uses, or designations beyond those analyzed in the EIR. As a result, there is no change in the project and no new significant environmental effects,or increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. Second, there have been no substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that will require major revisions of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The EIR, which addressed the impacts of adopting the City's General Plan and revisions to the land development code, was adopted on May 10, 2010. The existing conditions reported in the EIR are very similar to those currently in existence. Since adoption of the General Plan in 2010, the City has not processed any amendments to the plan. As a result, there are no substantial changes to the environment which would require a modification of the EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Third, there is no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR was certified that shows (a) the Project will have any significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) the significant effects examined Page 6 of 7 Addendum to the •250 Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report in the EIR will be substantially more severe than previously shown; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found to be infeasible would now be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project; or (d) considerably different mitigation measures or alternatives than those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment are now available. As the Project is consistent with the General Plan there are no new effects that were not discussed in the EIR. Similarly, the Project will not result in changes to the impacts identified in the EIR that could be considered substantially more severe. The Project does not alter any of the review processes in place for new projects, nor does it exempt new uses in the zoning ordinance from review. The Project addresses areas of responsibility for development review and affirms the appropriate body to make recommendations clarifies appeal procedures and establishes project review timelines. None of these changes will result in physical changes to the environment inconsistent with the General Plan as analyzed in the EIR. No additional mitigation measures are necessary. Summary In summary, the General Plan EIR sufficiently analyzed the potential impacts associated with the proposed Development Code Update. The City has a thorough development review process that is fully documented in the General Plan EIR, and that will remain in place following the proposed project. Page 7 of 7 P251 STAFF REPORT js4 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT it Date: June 19, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: President and Members of the Board of Directors John R. Gillison, City Manager/ Chief Executive Officer From: Mike Bell, Fire Chief By: Rob Ball, Fire Marshal Subject: Disposition of Inspection and Permit Fees for FY 13-14 and Adoption of Development Services Fees RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board of Directors approve Resolution FD 13-032 which sets development services fees for the Fire District, establishes a procedure for reviewing the fiscal need for certain fees, and authorizes the suspension of certain fees that would otherwise be collected. BACKGROUND Pursuant to direction given to staff at the April 17, 2013 Special Meeting, Resolution FD 13-032 has been prepared for the Board's consideration. As directed, staff has discussed with legal counsel and Chief Executive Officer Gillison a recommended means of suspending the collection of certain fees. New revenue to the District that resulted from the dissolution of the RDA and the elimination of the set aside for affordable housing is sufficient to support the operating costs of the Prevention Bureau. This additional revenue, which is unique to the Fire District, significantly reduces the need to rely on the cost recovery fees that were approved in 2006. At the time, cost recovery fees were the only viable option for funding a Prevention Bureau — a function and service the Board determined was vital in a community with a wide range of businesses that support the local economy. The resolution also sets development services fees such as plan check, inspection, and permit fees related to the installation or modification of fire protection systems and certain high risk business operations such as high piled rack storage and hazardous materials use or storage. ANALYSIS As discussed during the April 17, 2013 Board Meeting, Resolution FD 13-032, in part, provides for an opportunity annually to review the Fire District's current fees and charges and make an assessment as to the fiscal need to collect specific fees and/or charges that have been previously approved by the Board. The resolution notes that during the April 17, 2013 special meeting of the Board there was a determination made that there is not a fiscal need in the 2013-14 fiscal year to collect certain inspection and permit fees that were previously approved by the Board and which have been previously assessed and collected by Fire District staff. This resolution constitutes the Board action necessary to waive the collection of specific inspection and permit fees. The fees which will not be collected in fiscal year 2013-14 are listed P252 in Exhibit B of the resolution. In summary, these are 1) recurring inspection fees for facilities such as apartment buildings, hospitals, and medical care businesses. These are buildings and businesses that are regularly inspected, either by State mandate or by way of being identified as high hazard facilities, which do not require a Fire Code Operating Permit; and 2) fees associated with Fire Code Operational Permits for certain hazardous and high risk business operations that the Fire Code requires to be permitted by the local fire department. The permitting process anticipates that the business and its associated operations will be inspected on a regular basis to ensure compliance with all of the safety requirements for the particular operation or occupancy as conditioned by the permit. Fees that will continue to be collected include: - Special Use Inspection Fees such as fees for special events, fireworks shows, carnivals, particularly hazardous situations such as open burning and roof work that require oversight by Prevention Specialists, and re-inspection and standby fees. These fees are generally associated with the need to pay overtime to the Prevention Specialists who inspect these one- time activities and events, typically during non-business hours. - Special Services Fees such as fees for Community Facilities District (CFD) annexations and fees for false or unwanted alarms. The annexation fees cover the cost of processing annexations into the CFD and the false alarm fees are a deterrent mechanism. - Fees for District Supplied Signs and Equipment such as the cost recovery fees for District supplied padlocks that secure and provide firefighter access to gates throughout the Fire District and the District created signs that let firefighters know where access is obstructed. These signs are most often found on the roll up doors of repurposed warehouses where walls or fixtures have been approved in accordance with the Building Code in a manner that makes the roll up door no longer a good forced entry point for fire suppression personnel. Other safety signs provided by the District include Ladder Point and Photovoltaic (PV) placards that provide important roof information visible from the ground to assist with aerial and ground ladder operations. Both of these signs are District innovations that are beginning to see wider use in other fire departments. The resolution also sets development services fees for use by Fire District staff. These fees cover the cost of services that include plan checks, permits, and inspections associated with the design, installation, and/or modification of fire protection systems. As the City continues to work through the detrimental effects of the dissolution of the RDA, Prevention Specialists are able to assist the Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department's Fire Construction Services Unit on a limited basis with plan checking. Several Prevention Specialists have plan checking training and experience. Making use of these resources helps the City reduce its need to contract for plan checking services and can, during times of heavy work load, assist Fire Construction Services in meeting the plan check turn around goals established by the City Council for the benefit of individuals and businesses engaged in the development process. These fees will be collected when plan checking services are provided by District personnel, similar to when City fees are collected for plan checking services provided by Fire Construction Services. SUMMARY As directed by the Board at the April 17, 2013 Special Meeting, District staff has worked with legal counsel and the CEO's office to bring before the Board Resolution FD 13-032 which finds by Board action that there does not exist in fiscal year 2013-14 a fiscal need to collect certain fees and charges previously approved by the Board and formally suspends the collection of P253 those fees and charges for fiscal year 2013-14. A resolution of this nature will be brought before the Board on an annual basis hereinafter. This resolution also sets development services fees, an action that will allow the Fire District to assist Fire Construction Services with plan checks and associated services as the need arises. This will allow the two divisions to work cooperatively and more effectively in continuing to provide high quality service to the community. As such, it is recommended that the Board approves Resolution FD13-032. Respectf submitte. Mike Bell Fire Chief 1 P254 RESOLUTION NO. FD 13-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FEES AND CHARGES FOR VARIOUS FIRE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, INCLUDING PLAN CHECK, INSPECTION, AND PERMIT FEES; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR ANNUAL WAIVER OF SPECIFIC FEES; AND WAIVER OF SPECIFIC FEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2013-14. A. RECITALS. (i) The California Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, as hereinafter set forth, the local agency shall hold a noticed public hearing to consider the matter. (ii) On June 19, 2013, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the proposed fees and service charges, as required by law. (Hi) On April 17, 2013, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District conducted a public meeting of the Board of Directors to consider the fiscal need to collect certain District fees in fiscal year 2013-14. (iv)All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District hereby finds and resolves as follows: 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of this Resolution, are true and correct. 2. The Board of Directors specifically finds as follows: A. The Fire District has conducted a study of all costs incurred by the District in providing those services identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein (collectively, the "Services"). Costs to the District in providing the Services include, but are not limited to, salary and benefits paid to District employees, cost of any outside contractors, cost of maintaining the necessary equipment and facilities, asset usage costs, and risk management costs. B. The Fire District has calculated the minimum number of staff-hours that will necessarily be expended based upon the specific type of Services required. 3. Based upon the study of costs and staff-hours referenced in Section 2, above, the Board of Directors hereby approves and adopts the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit A. P255 4. The Board of Directors hereby finds that the fees and charges set forth in Exhibit A hereto, do not exceed the actual costs to the Fire District in providing the Services to which said fees and charges apply. 5. All previously adopted and existing fees and charges for performance of District Services identified in Exhibit A hereto, are hereby deemed to be superseded and replaced by the fees and charges herein. 6. Annual Review of District Fees and Charges. Not less than 30 days before the beginning of the next fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter, the District shall conduct a review of current District fees and charges. If the Board of Directors finds, by resolution or recorded minute motion, that given the existing financial condition of the District, there is no current fiscal need to collect a specific District fee or charge, then the Board of Directors shall have discretion to waive any such fee or charge for the upcoming fiscal year. Notwithstanding any such waiver, each fee and charge that is waived during any fiscal year, shall remain in effect and be collectible the following fiscal year unless, following the foregoing procedure, the Board of Directors again waives collection of such fee or charge. 7. The Board of Directors further finds as follows: A. The fees identified in Exhibit B were previously approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with all legal requirements for the adoption of fees for service. B. For fiscal year 2013-14, there does not exist a fiscal need to collect the fees identified in Exhibit B. 8. Based on the findings in Section 7, above, the Board of Directors hereby waives the collection of the fees identified in Exhibit B for fiscal year 2013-14. 9. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Please see the following page for formal adoption, certification and signatures. P256 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of June 2013. L. Dennis Michael, President ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary I, Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District at a Regular Meeting of said District held on this_day of , 2013. Janice C. Reynolds, Secretary P257 Fire District Resolution FD 13-032 Exhibit A • Development Services Fees Development Services Fees include one rough and one final inspection Standard Hourly Rate $132.60 Fire Sprinkler Systems - New System Unit 1-20 Heads per floor or system $150.69 21-100 Heads per floor or system $337.54 101-200 Heads per floor or system $458.08 201-350 Heads per floor or system $518.34 351+ Heads per floor or system $638.89 Fire Sprinkler Systems -Tenant Improvements Unit 1-4 Heads per floor or system $156.75 5-20 Heads per floor or system $216.94 21-100 Heads per floor or system $282.33 101-200 Heads per floor or system $458.08 201-350 Heads per floor or system $518.32 351+ Heads per floor or system $638.89 Other Fire Sprinkler Plan Review Items Unit Hydraulic Calculation per remote area $156.75 Antifreeze System per system $96.45 Dry Pipe Valve per valve $96.45 Deluge/ Preaction per valve $96.45 Fire Cycle per system $36.16 Pressure Reducing Station per valve $96.45 Fire Pump Unit per pump $277.26 Water Storage Tank Unit Gravity per tank $156.75 Pressure per tank $36.16 Standpipe System Unit per outlet $156.75 Fire Alarm/Monitoring System Unit 1-15 Devices per system $156.75 16-50 Devices per system $216.32 51-100 Devices per system $337.54 101-500 Devices per system $518.32 501-1,000 Devices per system $795.60 Each additional 25 devices per system $96.45 P258 Fire District Resolution FD 13-032 Exhibit A, continued Other Fire Alarm Review Items Unit Dampers each $96.45 Hi / Low Alarms each $96.45 Remote Annunciator each $96.45 Pre-Engineered Suppression Systems Unit Clean Agent each $277.26 Dry Chemical each $216.97 Wet Chemical/ Exhaust Hood each $397.80 Water Mist/Spray each $518.32 Foam each $518.32 Engineered Suppression Systems Billed by the hour at the Standard Hourly Rate Medical Gas Systems Unit Level 1 Hospital per system $397.80 Level 2 Dental with oxygen per system $397.80 Level 3 Dental without oxygen per system $156.75 Other Systems Unit Fuel Dispensing per site $518.32 Smoke Control per system $337.54 Nurse Call per system $156.75 Refrigeration per system $227.26 Other Plan Checks Unit Vehicle Access Gates per gate $156.75 Stationary Propane Tank per tank $277.26 High Piled Combustible Storage per area $518.32 Above Ground Tank or Pipe each $518.32 Underground Tank or Pipe each $518.32 P259 Fire District Resolution FD 13-032 Exhibit B Inspection and Permit Fees Suspended for FY 2013-14 Recurring Inspection Fees Apartment Building /Complex Annual Inspection Buildings with 3 or 4 units 165 Buildings with 5 to 7 units 220 Buildings with 8 units 330 Each additional dwelling unit (per unit) 11 Condominium Complex Annual Inspection 330 High Rise Building annual inspection (per hour) 110 Hotel/Motel Annual Inspection First 10 rooms 330 Each additional dwelling unit(per unit) 11 Licensed Care Facility Pre-inspection -25 or fewer residents 50 Pre-inspection - more than 25 residents 100 Annual Inspection Home Car Facility (more than six) 220 Commercial facility-first 10 rooms 330 Commercial facility-each additional room 11 Large Family Day Care annual inspection 110 Adult/Child Care Facility(Group 1-4 occupancies) 330 Private School/Large Child Care Facility (Group E occupancy) Small School - Less than 50 children 220 Large School - 50 or more children 330 Medical Facility Hospital/ Nursing Home (Group 1-2.1) 660 Clinic 220 Ambulatory Care Facility (group 1-2.1) 330 Alternate Method Annual Inspection (per hour) 110 Fire Code Operational Permit Fees Access Control Commercial 165 Residential (requires monthly testing) 550 Aerosol Products 550 Ambulatory Health Care Facility 220 Amusement Building 275 Aviation Facility Servicing or Repair 550 Fuel Servicing Vehicles 220 Battery Charging Operation 220 Cellulose Nitrate Film 330 Combustible Dust Producing Operations 5,000 square feet or less 275 5,001 to 15,000 square feet 550 More than 15,000 square feet 715 P260 Fire District Resolution FD 13-032 Exhibit B, continued Combustible Fibers 275 Commercial Cooking Operation 220 Compressed Gases Corrosive greater than 200 cubic feet 330 Flammable greater than 200 cubic feet 330 Highly toxic- any amount 330 Inert/Simple Asphyxiant greater than 6,000 cu ft 330 Irritant greater than 200 cubic feet 330 Medical Use Gases - Less than Table 105.6.8 Portable cylinders 165 Piped system 220 Other Health Hazard greater than 650 cubic feet 330 Oxidizing/oxygen greater than 504 cubic feet 330 Pyrophoric-any amount 330 Radioactive-any amount 330 Sensitizer greater than 200 cubic feet 330 Toxic-any amount 330 Unstable reactive-any amount 330 Covered Mall Building 658 Cryogenic Fluids 330 Cutting and Welding 275 Delayed Egress 165 Dipping Operations 330 Dry Cleaning Plant Small - 1 or 2 machines 220 Medium - 3 or 4 machines 330 Large- 5 or more machines 715 Explosives Process, manufacture, store, or sell 345 Use 240 Fire Alarm Services $10/acct Fire Hydrants and Valves 165 Flammable and Combustible Liquids Class I liquids in excess of 5 gal. in a building; 10 gal. 165 outside of a building Class II or Class IIIA in excess of 25 gal. in a building; 165 60 gal. outside of a building 250 gallons or less over max allowable quantity 550 251-500 gallons over max allowable quantity 578 501-1,000 gallons over max allowable quantity 605 1,001-5,000 gallons over max allowable quantity 633 5,001-10,000 gallons over max allowable quantity 660 More than 10,000 gallons over max allowable quantity 688 Remove Class I or Class II from a UST 936 Operate tank vehicles, etc 330 Place a tank out of service 936 Change contents 550 Manufacture, Process, Blend, Refine 1,128 Dispensing at Commercial, Industrial, Gov't site 330 P261 Fire District Resolution FD 13-032 Exhibit B continued Dispense-Tank vehicle to fuel tank 330 Use or Operate a pipeline within a facility 743 Floor Finishing in excess of 350 sq ft with Class I or II liquids Commercial/ Industrial 240 Residential 136 Fruit and Crop Ripening 550 Hazardous Materials in excess of amounts listed in Table 105.6.2 Gallons-250 or fewer 550 Gallons-251-500 578 Gallons- 501-1,000 605 Gallons- 1,001-5,000 633 Gallons- 5,001-10,000 660 Gallons- More than 10,000 688 Pounds- 1,000 or fewer 550 Pounds- 1,001-5,000 578 Pounds- 5,001-10,000 605 Pounds- 10,001-25,000 633 Pounds-25,001-50,000 660 Pounds- More than 50,000 688 Cubic feet- 500 or fewer 550 Cubic feet- 501-2,000 578 Cubic feet-2,001-5,000 605 Cubic feet- 5,001-10,000 633 Cubic feet- 10,001-25,000 660 Cubic feet- More than 25,000 688 HPM Facilities 440 High Piled Combustible Storage in excess of 500 square feet 500-75,000 square feet 550 75,001-500,000 square feet 605 More than 500,000 square feet 660 Hot Work Hot Work Fixed Site 275 Hot Work Operations 220 Hot Work Program 165 Industrial Facility/Shop Includes all required permits; if actual fees are lower, actual fees will apply 2,500 square feet or less 240 2,501-5,000 square feet 330 5,001-15,000 square feet 550 15,001-50,000 square feet 743 More than 50,000 square feet-Actual permit fees Industrial Ovens 330 Large Family Day Care 110 Liquid- or Gas-Fueled vehicles or equipment in Assembly area or oa 165 P262 Fire District Resolution FD 13-032 Exhibit B, continued LP-gas Store, Use, Handle, Dispense, Sell 220 Industrial Trucks and Equipment Only (4 cylinder maxim. 165 Cylinder Exchange only 110 Live Audience 240 Lumber Yard and/or Wood Working Plant 440 . Magnesium 330 Miscellaneous Combustible Storage 220 Motor Fuel Dispensing Facility-Commercial 330 Motor Fuel Dispensing Facility- Residential 110 Open Flames Open Flames and torches for paint removal 110 Open Flames and torches in a hazardous fire area 110 Open Flames and candles in Assembly and Education or 110 Organic Coatings 330 Pallet Storage 275 Place of Assembly A-1 Theaters, Concert Halls, Auditoriums 440 A-2 Banquet Halls, Night Clubs, Restaurants, Taverns, B 330 A-3 Places of Worship, Recreation, Amusement 330 A-4 Indoor sports arenas and similar-fixed seats 440 A-5 Outdoor assembly area and/or use 660 Powder Coating 330 Private Fire Hydrant 165 Production Facility 385 Pyrotechnical Special Effects Material (see Fireworks) Pyroxylin Plastics 440 Recycling and Scrap Metal Facility 550 Refrigeration Equipment 275 Reinforced Plastics/ Resin Application 330 Repair Garage Includes all required permits; if actual fees are lower, actual fees will apply 2,500 square feet or less 240 2,501-5,000 square feet 330 5,001-15,000 square feet 550 15,001-50,000 square feet 743 More than 50,000 square feet-Actual permit fees Rooftop Heliport 220 Spraying Operations 330 Stationary Storage Battery System 330 Storage of Scrap Tires and Byproducts 220 Tire Rebuilding Plant 1,128 Waste Handling Facility 550 Wood Products 440 Wrecking Yard/Junk Yard 550 P263 a STAFF REPORT w� PUNNING DEPARTMENT Lt DATE: June 19, 2013 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner John D. Criste, AICP, Planning Consultant SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE/SPECIFIC CHANGE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BUS RAPID TRANSIT STUDY DRC2012-00610 — Compass Blueprint Project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review the comments made by the Planning Commission on the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Corridor Study for Foothill Boulevard and provide their own comment and input relevant to the subject BRT corridor. The report is to be received and filed for future reference. Project Summary Over the past year, City staff, Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and the Terra Nova Planning & Research consulting team have been working on the Compass Blueprint Project. Compass Blueprint is a SCAG Planning program in response to the land use and transportation challenges facing Southern California now and in the coming years. Important support and cooperation has also been provided by Omnitrans and San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG). BRT has emerged over the past two decades as an efficient way to move a large number of transit riders along a route in a quick and efficient manner. This rapid bus service makes BRT a viable alternative to the private car for many trips and provides enhanced accessibility in terms of speed, frequency, and reliability. The subject study was undertaken to identify constraints and opportunities for BRT service along the corridor. It was also prepared to study how and where transit-oriented development (TOD) could occur that would support BRT use along Foothill Boulevard. BRT Corridor Planning SANBAG, SCAG, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and Omnitrans have included the Foothill Boulevard BRT corridor in long range planning efforts. The envisioned corridor is very similar for both the City and Omnitrans plans. The Omnitrans System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan envisions the Foothill Boulevard BRT corridor extending directly from Grove Avenue to East Avenue. The City vision differs slightly in that the eastern end of the route would bypass the Foothill Boulevard/I-15 Freeway interchange area, turning north and passing through and along the Victoria Gardens area to stations at the intersection with Church Street, proceeding east on Church Street and then south on East Avenue to Foothill Boulevard. The Omnitrans plan includes stations at Grove Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue that are not included in the City's plan. Conversely, the City plan includes two stations within the Victoria Gardens area that are not included on the Omnitrans plan. The City/Terra Nova team is recommending a minor modification to the City's eastern route, relocating stations from about one mile east of Day Creek Boulevard to the intersection of Victoria Gardens Lane and Church Street. The P264 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR STUDY DRC2012-00610 June 19, 2013 Page 2 recommended route change would also redirect the route to Etiwanda Avenue rather than to East Avenue. Stations at the Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard intersection are also recommended to further enhance access to this important commercial area. Most of the station locations proposed in the City General Plan are at the intersection of major roadways at approximately one mile spacing. The City General. Plan Community Mobility Chapter delineates Foothill Boulevard as a truck route and also proposes the development of Class II Bike Lanes along this roadway. This is in keeping with the Complete Streets Program that was adopted by the City Council on December 5, 2012. Summary of the Foothill Boulevard BRT Corridor Study The BRT corridor study is divided into six sections that include an introductory overview, a discussion of Foothill Boulevard as it is today, a summary assessment of relevant City planning documents, a description of the public outreach efforts made for this project, a discussion of BRT planning and design, and transit-oriented land planning and design. Each is summarized below. Introductory Overview: This section describes the project, its objectives, concerns and key issues, and the relationship of Foothill Boulevard to the larger BRT corridor project of which it is a part. Foothill Boulevard Summary: This summary examines the existing and planned conditions for Foothill Boulevard and lands adjoining the corridor. Focus is on right-of-way and its improvements, and the various land uses within the area of influence for BRT stations and service. Also evaluated are the socio-economic conditions in the area of influence and whether and to what extent these conditions enhance or reduce BRT use. Finally, the various "opportunity sites" identified along the corridor that could accommodate BRT-supporting development are also evaluated. Out of the 13 evaluated, 11 seem suitable for some form of mixed-use development that supports rapid transit. City Regulatory Document Review: An important part of this planning effort has been to assess regulatory documents affecting and guiding development along the Foothill Boulevard corridor. The extent to which these regulations enhance or stifle TOD development is also evaluated. First consideration has been for relevant elements of the General Plan, applicable portions of the Development Code, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and the Visual Improvement Plan. The study identified policy drivers, as well as development standards and guidelines that may affect corridor BRT development and includes recommendations for TOD-friendly and specific revisions. Public Outreach and Workshops: A public outreach program and materials were developed in coordination between the City, Terra Nova team, Omnitrans and SANBAG. Prior to initiating the workshops, research was conducted to identify the key attitudes and behaviors that are related to use of transit. Numerous research reports and previously conducted surveys were reviewed before preparing those for the Foothill Boulevard BRT corridor study. Public opinion and related research, including holding workshops and surveys were conducted that provided insight into the overt and implied motivations of business owners and managers, customers, renters and homebuyers, and other interest groups. Workshops and stakeholder interviews associated with this project allowed a more detailed exploration of the type of development that may complement and support the operations of a BRT route and service. In addition to the two public workshops, a joint Planning Commission/City Council study session workshop was also held. Outreach included articles in the Daily Bulletin, a posting on an electronic signage board, posting the project and making surveys P265 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR STUDY DRC2012-00610 June 19, 2013 Page 3 available on the City's web site, and hundreds of direct mailings to businesses and property owners along the corridor. Bus Rapid Transit Planning and Design: The study examines methods of BRT system design that enhance station access and provide adequate station areas with amenities that are conducive to an efficient and enjoyable BRT experience. Consideration is also given to providing local access to the stations for all modes of transportation with a particular emphasis on alternative modes such as pedestrian and bicycle. Questions of system design, BRT station locations and design, and connectivity with surrounding lands and multi-modal connectivity are discussed. The discussion also addresses general BRT system design principles and how they affect the desirability, accessibility, comfort and functional travel convenience of BRT for those traveling to work, school, personal errands, shopping or for other purposes. Design issues that are specific to the City's portion of Foothill Boulevard are also addressed and BRT design recommendations are made. Transit-Oriented Land Planning and Design: This section discusses and illustrates the various design and development parameters essential to securing quality, synergistic transit-oriented development. The purpose of TOD land planning and design is to achieve an integrated mix of land uses, including residential development at density. It also strongly relies on the effects of a convenient BRT transit station and the unique development, parking, and other standards needed for successful TOD development. Principles explored include connectivity, land use density and intensity, and land use diversity. The concepts of the "public realm" and creating an environment that facilitates and enriches social experiences are fleshed out. Finally, three opportunity sites are further analyzed and development concepts drafted to illustrate how appropriate land use planning and development standards and guidelines can help assure efficient, effective mixed-use development that supports rapid transit. The Bigger Picture - The Foothill Boulevard/5th Street BRT Corridor: The City's Foothill Boulevard BRT corridor study is just part of a larger planning effort sponsored by SCAG, SANBAG, and Omnitrans. This corridor, which includes the subject seven-mile segment in the City, will be 35± miles long and will extend from the City of Highland on the east to the Montclair Transit Center and a Metro Gold Line connection at the county line on the west. This larger analysis also looks at existing conditions outside the City's segment, identifies BRT options and opportunities, addresses land planning associated with BRT station planning, and will provide recommendations. Recently, staff was approached by SANBAG's consultants for this project. Their recommendation is to keep the BRT route along Foothill Boulevard to run straight through without a loop that runs along Victoria Gardens Lane. Their proposal would suggest a station location on Day Creek Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard. The logic is that a BRT should be fast, and any riders going to and/or from Victoria Gardens could transfer to a local bus or shuttle that would serve the regional shopping area. Working closely with SANBAG, staff will support alternatives that may be presented as the study progresses or as new information is available. Technical Memorandum: Following the review of the final study by the Planning Commission and City Council, a brief technical memorandum outlining recommended "next steps" will be prepared for City and SCAG staff. The technical memorandum will make recommendations for City Development Code P266 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR STUDY DRC2012-00610 June 19, 2013 Page 4 revisions that address TOD-appropriate land uses, residential types and densities, and development standards and guidelines. Planning Commission Review Staff presented the staff report and BRT study at the June 12, 2013, Planning Commission meeting. Draft minutes from that meeting are attached as Exhibit B and their comments will also be noted in staffs PowerPoint presentation before the City Council. Respectfully submitted, Candyce urnett Planning Manager CB:MN/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Final BRT Corridor Study for Foothill Boulevard Exhibit B -Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes June 12, 2013 Distributed Under Separate Cover June 19,2013 City Council Meetings--ITEM 01.-- DRC2012-00610—Compass Blueprint Project Development Code/Specific Change analysis and recommendations for the Foothill Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Study Please see: p.263-Staff Report I Letter I p.267-Study I p.268 W-6.12.2013 DRAFT Minutes r � L J TERRA NOVA P A\KING & RESEARCH INC.® June 13,2013 Planning&Historic Preservation Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 90017 • RE: Compass Blueprint Demonstration Project No. 12-001-B02 - Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard BRT Corridor Study Dear Chairwoman Howdyshell and Commissioners: On behalf of our team members,I would like to thank you for taking the time to review and comment on the Foothill Boulevard BRT Corridor Study prepared for SCAG and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It has benefited significantly from the involvement of the City Planning and Public Works Department staff,as well as numerous city officials and members of the general public. I would also like to apologize for the blunt and inappropriate language that should have and was intended to be edited out of Appendix A of this study, portions of which were cited by one of the commissioners in his comments at the June 12th study review. The draft appendix was from August of last year and did not receive the requisite editing before being included in the study the Commissioners reviewed this spring. It was neither our intent to offend nor to show any disrespect for the City or its substantial accomplishments. Please be assured that the final edit will reflect the true respect and appreciation we feel for the City,its leaders and staff. Respectfully, hn D. Criste, AICP rincipal JDC/kc Enclosure cc File 42635 MELANIE PLACE, SUITE 101 D PALM DESERT, CA 92211 0(760) 341-48000 FAX (760) 341-4455 P267 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR STUDY COMPASS BLUEPRINT DEMONSTRATION (THIS EXHIBIT DISTRIBUTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER) EXHIBIT A APPENDIX A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CUCAMONGA SPECIFIC PLAN BRT CORRIDOR STUDY SCAG COMPASS BLUEPRINT DEMONSTRATION PROJECT CONTRACT NO. 12-001-B02 Land Use and Planning Documents Analysis & Recommendations Evaluating the General Plan Land Use and Community Mobility Elements, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Development Code, Visual Improvement Plan and Omnitrans BRT Plans A Terra Nova Planning& Research, Inc.® 42635 Melanie Place, Suite 101 Palm Desert, CA 92211 Phone: 760-341-4800 In Association with: Interactive Design Corporation Urban Crossroads VisionScape Imagery August 3, 2012; Revised June 13, 2013 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis SCAG/RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMPASS BLUE PRINT DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR STUDY CONTRACT NO. 12-001-B02 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 3 Omnitrans BRT Program and Foothill Boulevard 4 Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Policies 8 General Plan Land Use Element 8 Summary of General Plan Land Use Perspective 14 General Plan Community Mobility Element 15 Summary General Plan Community Mobility Perspective 22 Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and City Development Code 23 Visual Improvement Plan 40 An Expanded Aesthetic 41 2 • Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis SCAG/RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMPASS BLUE PRINT DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BRT CORRIDOR STUDY CONTRACT NO. 12-001-B02 INTRODUCTION This preliminary report documents our review and evaluation of four regulatory documents controlling development along the Foothill Boulevard corridor, including the General Plan, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Development Code and Visual Improvement Plan. It also includes a review of relevant portions of the Omnitrans System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan for the San Bernardino Valley and the sbX E Street BRT Plan. Our efforts identify and document regulatory provisions that affect direct land use and transportation planning along the corridor that may affect the implementation of the Omnitrans BRT route, stations and other facilities. We also identify opportunities for enhanced pedestrian and bicycle facilities along the corridor. Finally, we have reviewed the Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan and assess the design guidelines and improvement concepts that may affect or may need to be updated to bring into conformance with the design analysis associated with future BRT facilities, and enhanced bike lanes and pedestrian improvements. This report and review meeting satisfies Tasks 2.1 through 2.6 of this project. Project Area Description The project area consists of the entire length of Foothill Boulevard through the City, from Grove Avenue on the west to East Avenue on the east. The focus of the additional design concepts wi-li-should be at the two entry gateway areas and the eight activity centers. The westerly gateway is the area from Grove Avenue to the railroad overpass, where significant improvements have recently been made. The eight activity centers are located in the areas of the major cross streets that intersect with Foothill Boulevard. They are Vineyard Avenue, Archibald Avenue, Hermosa Avenue, Haven Avenue, Milliken Avenue, Rochester Avenue, Day Creek Boulevard, and Etiwanda Avenue. The easterly gateway is the intersection at East Avenue. For purposes of this analysis we have extended our research to one mile 3 r Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis north and south of the Foothill corridor for land use assessment, and to one-half mile north and south of the corridor to assess demographics that may use and determine the success of the future BRT corridor, also taking into consideration land uses that may directly or indirectly support the planned BRT system. OMNITRANS BRT PROGRAM AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD This discussion represents our initial effort documenting our review of the various resources relevant to the ongoing effort to establish a successful bus rapid transit (BRT) corridor along Foothill Boulevard through the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project area is located in the northwest portion of the San Bernardino Valley. A BRT connection to much of the urbanized valley and points beyond (particularly Los Angeles County)will ultimately be provided as the overall BRT Transit Corridor Plan is developed. As part of our initial work effort, pertinent documents describing the planned or proposed transportation infrastructure in and around the City of Rancho Cucamonga along Foothill Boulevard have been reviewed. Documents that have been reviewed include: • System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan for the San Bernardino Valley(Omnitrans, 2010) • City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Community Mobility Chapter (City of Rancho Cucamonga, 2010) • Bus Stop Design Guidelines (Omnitrans, 2006) • Station Design Powerpoint Presentation(Omnitrans,2012) Both the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Omnitrans have included the Foothill Boulevard BRT corridor in their long range planning efforts. The corridor as envisioned is very similar for the two agencies, however there are slight differences. The Omnitrans System-Wide Transit Corridor Plan envisions a corridor along Foothill Boulevard with no deviations. The City of Rancho Cucamonga vision includes a deviation at the eastern end of the City that would bypass the Foothill Boulevard / I-15 Freeway interchange area and would instead pass through the Victoria Gardens area of the City. The Omnitrans plan also includes a station at Grove Street and a Station at Etiwanda Avenue that are not included in the City of Rancho Cucamonga plan. Conversely, the City of Rancho Cucamonga plan includes 2 stations within the Victoria Gardens area that are not included on the Omnitrans plan. As discussed, below, we are recommending that the city consider a minor modification to the eastern portion of the route to align it with Etiwanda Avenue (rather than East Avenue) and also reconsider the appropriateness of a station at the Etiwanda Avenue/Foothill Boulevard intersection. Most of the station locations proposed in the City General Plan are at the intersection of major roadways at approximately 4-one mile spacing. The City General Plan Mobility Element also delineates Foothill Boulevard as a truck route and a-l-so---proposed# the development of Class II bike lanes along this roadway. Although all of the arterial roadway cross-sections include provisions for bike lanes, it is likely that some potential cyclists interested in accessing the BRT system using their bicycles will be discouraged by the relatively high traffic volumes along these roadways unless bicycles can he better accommodated. All of the north-south streets at the proposed station locations are also truck routes, which would offer a further impediment to bicycle access. 4 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis The General Plan also includes many policies intended to facilitate the use of alternative modes of transportation. Examples include providing dedicated parking for electric vehicles, extending multi-use trails such as the Pacific Electric Trail, and multiple policies related to accommodating transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. I The Omnitrans documents that were reviewed as a part of this initial resource review assessment included general recommendations and guidelines regarding transportation amenities and strategies to enhance the success of the BRT system. Two broad categories of strategies/ amenities are evident; ways to enhance access to the BRT system, and ways to enhance the competitive nature of the BRT system when compared to the automobile--oriented system. In each case, users and other occupants of the transportation system will be asked "To what extent are we willing to accommodate the BRT system to ensure its ultimate success?" Methods of enhancing access include providing adequate station areas with amenities that are conducive to an efficient and enjoyable BRT experience, as well as providing local access to the stations for all modes of transportation, with a particular emphasis on alternative modes such as pedestrian, bicycle, and even less traditional modes such as neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs). The issue of enhancing the competitive nature of the BRT system involves choices that are potentially even more difficult. An exclusive BRT facility typically requires dedicating a travel lane in each direction to the BRT system, implying a reduction in capacity for competing modes of transportation, particularly the automobile. Less intrusive strategies include partially exclusive facilities, where BRT is favored only where it does not impact other modes of transport, or non-exclusive BRT, which relies primarily on station spacing and system management strategies to achieve BRT goals. Omnitrans System Design Concepts The transit authority has considered the various design parameters that are integral to an effective BRT system, including available on-street travelways and separate and mixed-flow lanes, lane separators, signal prioritizing and others. Equally important is the siting and design of BRT station, which include median (double-loaded) and parkways sited facilities. The functionality of each station and how it fits into the surrounding urban context must address the following design objectives: • Location which is integrated and has linkages with adjacent land uses • Distinctive image that emphasizes motion and technology and responds to the architectural environment as a whole • Sense of place provided at stations • Protection from the sun, wind and rain • Accessibility for persons with disabilities and services incorporated into the design of the station • Sense of security for patrons • System and neighborhood information available at stations • Design modularity to respond to individual site conditions, such as narrow sidewalks, and for flexibility in expansion 5 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis • Ease of maintenance and parts replacement • Rapid boarding and alighting through raised platforms, low floor vehicles, fare prepayment or smart cards • Sustainability considerations BRT Station,Design Station architecture is subject to some degree of local input and control; and serious consideration should be given to customizing RC-specific designs that contribute to the unique character and aesthetic being developed along the Foothill corridor within the City. A major component of the sbX station is expected to be the uniform application of the sbX logo. Other design considerations for the stations include canopies, seating/bench, windscreens,bike racks, water fountains and fare collection equipment. For purposes of the next phase of design development, we anticipate possibly expanding upon this suite of considerations and also providing design concepts that show how the stations should be integrated with existing and future development. In addition, we envision development of a variety of supporting land uses and activities and technologies, including broadband wi-41, convenience commercial services, including coffee shops and cafes with tables and gathering places where riders can socialize and pick up something to drink, eat or read. BRT Issues and Opportunities For purposes of this analysis, we have taken a broader view of the Foothill Boulevard corridor, including the areas within 1 mile north and south of Foothill Boulevard. Our consideration includes the local street network, along with the previously presented arterial roadway system. The local street system is an important aspect of the overall transportation network within the project area. The following issues and opportunities should be considered in the next phases of this project: • The available plans require reconciliation of competing modes of travel to present a unified vision that will allow for ongoing planning and a concerted effort to provide the necessary station facilities. • The planned station locations are generally located at major roadway intersections, and further refinement to build upon opportunities to better utilize land that is currently vacant and / or underdeveloped should be possible. • There is an identified need for better correspondence between land use patterns, especially residential and employment but also commercial, and the effectiveness and efficiency of BRT travel; is there or can we create an adequate market for BRT use. • Another opportunity is the possible relocation of stations away from major intersections to locations where additional available roadway capacity may afford an opportunity for partially exclusive BRT strategies such as queue jumper lanes. • The local roadway system may provide an opportunity to establish enhanced networks of facilities that emphasize alternative modes of transport, including bicycles and NEVs. These issues and opportunities lead to questions that can be put to decision-makers and other involved local citizens to gauge the degree of support for various strategies. Possible questions include: 6 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis • Would you support increased development density in the vicinity of BRT stations Toe-at-ions-to enhance ridership and system success, recognizing that this could (but not necessarily) also lead to an increase in traffic? • Would you support dedicating travel lanes to exclusive BRT use if this could be done without changing or violating the City's current LOS standard? • Would you support dedicating travel lanes to exclusive BRT use if this would require changing or violating the City's current LOS standard? • Would you support shared use of travel lanes such as right turn lanes to allow BRT vehicles to "queue jump" past automobiles? • Would you be willing to support identifying designated bicycle and / or NEV routes on selected local streets? • Would you support dedicating space in public or private property within or near station locations to provide amenities such as bicycle lockers, showers, or other facilities to support the BRT system? All of these questions must be asked within the context of information about what these questions mean for the operation of a BRT system along Foothill Boulevard. As a prelude to soliciting input on these and other relevant questions, we envision an information packet that describes BRT systems and how they operate. These and other questions to be developed in consultation with City staff will be used to gather input from a wide range of stakeholders during the next phase of this project. Integrated Design Analysis Working with Omnitrans and City Planning and Public Works staff, we will pursue an integrated approach to BRT travelway and station design and development. This will include an assessment of the best possible travelway layout and design, optimum and most efficient station siting : . :• ' .: " - • . desivireptioni), and adjoining land use planning that complements, and supports the demand for and use of the BRT system. 7 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN POLICIES We began our analysis with and proceed from the most general to the most specific. Therefore, our first consideration has been relevant elements of the General Plan, and specifically and primarily the Land Use Element (Chapter 2: Managing Land Use, Community Design and Historic Resources) and Community Mobility Element (Chapter 3). We have also identified other General Plan drivers that may affect corridor BRT development policy and plans. General Plan Land Use Element GP Land Use Element: Vision Statement As noted, the Land use Element is embedded in Chapter 2: Managing Land Use, Community Design and Historic Resources. The enhancement of the Foothill corridor for BRT and other alternative modes of I transportation are discussed through—out the chapter and include the following from the Vision statement: "We encourage the retention, rehabilitation, and development of a diverse housing stock that caters to residents in all stages of their lives." "We maximize the industrial economic development power of our rail and highway connections. The Foothill Boulevard, State Route 210, and I-15 corridors are the core of our commercial development and provide both jobs for our families and revenues for our community services. Our economic base maintains a mix of cultural, residential, industrial, and local and regional commercial uses with stable development." "Foothill Boulevard (Route 66) is the historic thread that ties our community together. We must continually revitalize the corridor while telling the story of the past and balancing preservation. This will be done through the adaptive reuse of buildings, strong architectural design, and public art. "We are dedicated to a sustainable balance in land use patterns (residential, business, educational, agricultural, recreational, open space, and historic uses) and supporting transportation." Comments on Vision Statement Relevant portions of the vision statements in the Land Use Element clearly support an integrated view of land use, including diversity of housing, as well as the commercial and other services, and employment centers. This perspective can be well supported in the various components of the BRT corridor planning effort, tying together the land uses that are in proximity to one another, and that also support the use of a well-designed BRT system. The vision statements also support the view of the corridor as an important part of the history of the community. In this regard, however, and as indicated elsewhere in the General Plan and the Visual Improvement Plan (VIP), the emphasis on the "Route 66" theme can be limiting from both a placemaking and marketing perspective. Alternatively, a broader conceptualization of the corridor fFeffi 8 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga • Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis as a "Mmaking Hhistory" and enhanced community design aesthetic can diversify the corridor without unnecessarily limiting its iconic place in the community. Before citing and responding to relevant land use policies, we should first point out that the General Plan discusses the importance of optimizing infill development and in integrating land use with transportation planning. This includes recognizing the desirability of walkable neighborhoods, which can also include the "districts" planned and partially developed along the Foothill corridor, and walkability along the length of the corridor itself. I The General Plan identifies the appropriateness of "Well-planned infill [that] can create cultural, social, recreational, and entertainment opportunities, gathering places, and bring vitality to historic roadway I corridors (e.g., Foothill Boulevard) and [adjoining] neighborhoods." Otir—The BRT planning efforts are directly geared to help accomplish this goal. Integral to this concept is a land use and transportation plan that: "provides greater transportation options, such as walking and transit, particularly through infill and Mixed Use development. For example, residents living in a new Mixed Use development should not only be able to walk a few blocks to grab a bite to eat or get a cup of coffee, but also to access a transit line." The General Plan also identifies Foothill Boulevard as a focus area of land use and associated planning. The diversity of lot sizes and existing and approved development has also been noted. Issues associated with the buildout of the corridor include the desirability of mixed-use development, focusing commercial development and BRT transit facilities at major intersections, and improving the "visual feel" along the corridor. However, the vision for this area is not as well described as it might be. Specifically, reference is made to the _"concentration of community- and regional-serving uses east of haven Avenue, while neighborhood-serving uses are [to be] focused on the western portion." _Regional commercial is typified in the area by Victoria Gardens, and while this project is envisioned and partially built out as a mixed- use development, it is distinctly different from the type of"walking corridor" we envision a1 -at BRT- supportine nodal development along Foothill Boulevard itself. The "vision" for Foothill Boulevard also looks to the: _"-Design [of] new development in such a way as to accommodate both transit and automobile access." _While this statement may, on the face of it, sound inclusionary, it in fact can nde.;ni-ne-deter the effort to bring an effective BRT route to this corridor. IRemaining roadway capacity should be viewed as an opportunity to diversify the modes of travel, including transit thattransit that can use the corridor. This cannot be accomplished by also fully facilitating the automobile, which is an inefficient user of roadway capacity (see Complete Streets principles). General Plan Land Use Policies 9 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis The following Land Use Element policies have been identified as most relevant to the BRT corridor I plan, are cited and are briefly discussed below. The policies and one goal are in Italics, with Olif comments in plain text and noted as "comment". Policy LU-2.1: Plan for vibrant, pedestrian friendly Mixed Use and high density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes. Discussion: Based on a comprehensive land use analysis, the General Plan identifies areas that are appropriate for Mixed Use development. Generally, these areas are located along Foothill Boulevard, although other limited areas designated for Mixed Use development are located within the southern industrial section of the City. The General Plan allows considerable latitude in terms of the mix of uses and development density/intensity to encourage excellence of design, integrated uses, and sustainability in Mixed Use development. Comment: This policy provides authority to the concept of medium and high-density development at appropriate nodes along the corridor and will be relied upon to rationalize the land use development concepts we arcbeins;developedi-ng. Policy LU-2.2: Require new infill development to be designed for pedestrians and automobiles equally, and to provide connections to transit and bicycle facilities. Discussion: While the development pattern of Rancho Cucamonga demands significant automobile usage to get from one use to another, the General Plan seeks to achieve a more balanced mix of transportation choices as the City evolves. Consequently, the General Plan expands the potential for Mixed Use development in key areas. Development of higher-density housing mixed with a variety of commercial and civic uses, and public spaces, with convenient access for pedestrians, bicycle riders, and transit users will have positive impacts on air quality, mobility, and other general quality of life measures. Comment: This policy is internally inconsistent, giving equal weight to transit and pedestrian/bicycle users, while doing the same for the automobile. As noted above, automobiles are the least efficient users of roadway capacity, reduce capacity that can otherwise that can be made available to transit and bicycles_.: an*l-Fullv accommodating the automobile al-se-can also adversely affect pedestrian facilities and use along the parkways and at crossings. Consideration should be made given to revising this and related policies that ignore these contradictions, which will may otherwise frustrate the implementation of an effective BRT system. Policy LU-3.1: Encourage the creation and maintenance of regional employment, cultural and retail destinations, as well as a full range of amenities and services to support residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Discussion: The Rancho Cucamonga community currently enjoys a wealth of various employment, cultural, entertainment, and retail destinations. The General Plan recognizes that the City will need to continue to attract and maintain a balanced mix of uses, a range of amenities, and high-quality development to adequately meet the needs of 10 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis the growing population base. Comment: Pursuant to this policy, the development of new and differentiated land uses along Foothill can greatly diversify the corridor with a mix of housing and commercial and possibly additional office development that places jobs near housing, and also creates scaled down retail destinations that support dining, entertainment and other complementary commercial uses. This type of nodal development in the vicinity of BRT stations would facilitate implementation of this policy. Policy LU-3.2: Encourage a mix of retail, service, industrial and manufacturing, and professional uses that create diverse, well paying employment opportunities. Discussion: A diverse employment base that includes different business sectors allows for a diverse workforce and income levels. This diversity allows for competitive salaries and rewarding employment opportunities for all levels of society. Further, a diverse employment base maximizes job opportunities for Rancho Cucamonga residents. The General Plan establishes a comprehensive set of land use designations that allows flexibility and responsiveness to market conditions and supports a diversity of businesses. Comment: This policy is essentially the same as LU-3.1, but reveals the city's predisposition to professional jobs, which are typically higher paying, result in household (or at least local employees) with greater discretionary income, and hav ge a more beneficial impact on the local economy. The corridor already supports a wide range of jobs, and has recently added multi-family housing along the west portion of the corridor. and anAn appropriate mix of additional multi-family housing in the vicinity of BRT station nodes can provide higher-end condominiums and quality apartments, as well as more affordable dwelling units, which in turn an -can further diversify the neighborhoods along and near the corridor. Policy LU-3.8: Implement land use patterns and policies that incorporate smart growth practices, including placement of higher densities near transit centers and along transit corridors, allowing Mixed Use development, and encouraging and accommodating pedestrian movement. Discussion: Smart growth emphasizes accessibility, meaning that the activities people use frequently are located close together. Its practices integrate transportation and land use decisions by encouraging more compact, Mixed Use development within existing urban areas and along transit lines, such as Omnitrans bus routes and possible future Bus Rapid Transit lines. Higher density development along transit corridors could lead to fewer automobile trips as residents opt for transit use, particularly along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Comment: This policy is directly responsive to SB 375 and other state mandates that tie land use to transportation and the reduction of VMTs and associated GHG and other emissions. The emphasis on pedestrian movement, especially in the absence of trying to add more cars, is also welcome and consistent with needed design concepts to support BRT and other non-car modes of travel. The Foothill BRT corridor concept should bank on this policy. 11 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis GOAL LU-4: Establish a pedestrian friendly Foothill Boulevard corridor that facilitates transit use and provides a range of commercial destinations to serve both local and . regional needs. Comment: This goal can play directly into the BRT concept for the corridor. What might be added to this would be to also establish a land use pattern and bicycle and pedestrian-friendly.— context awl-that also provides a range of residential developments and commercial destinations.- The point is that the strategy needs to be an integrated one that supports development of a balanced mix of residential and commercial development. Policy LU-4.1: Provide new Mixed Use development opportunities along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor to allow residential, commercial, and civic uses, and to accommodate both transit and automobiles. Discussion: A key focus of the Foothill Boulevard planning concept is the design of an attractive, pedestrian-oriented corridor that promotes the use of walking, biking, and transit, and that supports the potential for higher-density mixed commercial and residential uses throughout the corridor. Comment: Comments on the above referenced goal also apply to this policy. It is uncertain what additional "civic" uses are intended. Branch libraries, senior centers and similar civic uses could certainly help to support a diverse corridor. Here too, it is fortunate that an attempt is not made to shoehorn the automobile into the policy. Appropriately scaled commercial that does not require the use of an automobile will be an essential part of nodal, our BRT-supporting commercial concepts along the corridor and specifically at or near transit stations. Policy LU-4.2: Concentrate community-and regional-serving uses on Foothill Boulevard (east of Haven Avenue), providing a range of commercial, office, residential, restaurant, and entertainment-related uses. Discussion: Eastern Foothill Boulevard (east of Haven Avenue) will focus more on community and regionally focused retail and commercial service land uses. There will be some opportunities to integrate residential, commercial, office, and medical uses. These uses are meant to work together to create an environment that is pedestrian friendly, but also accommodates transit, bicycle, and automobile use. Comment: This portion of the planning area already has substantial community-serving commercial development east of Haven Avenue, including a Home Depot sited on lands designated General Commercial, although this can also be construed as a regional commercial use. While there may beThere are nonetheless opportunities for mixed-use development in conjunction with BRT stations in this area has limited opportunities butand should not be discounted for this purpose. BRT nodes at Milliken Avenue. at Victoria Gardens and at Etiwanda Avenue are good examples that should be further explored. Policy LU-4.5: Continue to reinforce the identity of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue by supporting development projects that are comparable to the quality of the Civic Center and County Courthouse complex, Terra Vista Town 12 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis Center, and the adaptive re-use of the historic Virginia Dare Winery. Discussion: The intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue is an important area of the City due to the civic uses of the City Hall and Courthouse complex, the re-use of the Virginia Dare Winery, the Town Square Mixed Use project, and the Terra Vista Town Center Shopping Center. Comment: All four corners of the Foothill/Haven intersection are already fully developed. The principle opportunity identified in the General Plan is the potential adaptive re-use of the Virginia Dare building, which is currently an office center. Given the high levels of employment in the immediate vicinity, the substantial institutional uses (City Hall, courts, churches, etc.) and the substantial residential development at the southwest corner, there is a valuable opportunity to further diversify this node on the corridor. Such diversification might include a fine arts museum in the Virginia Dare building. Policy LU-4.6:Accommodate land uses that support the activity centers envisioned in the Historic Cucamonga sector, as identified in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Discussion: Creating identifiable centers is important in placemaking. Building on the City's historic routes is a viable way to create meaningful places with appropriate land uses. See the Historic Resources section of this Chapter for more information regarding historic districts. Comment: While the historic resources discussion touches on an arts/cultural center, it references this in the context of Victoria Gardens. This development is already a "place", while the downtown portion of the corridor is more limited and currently most distinguished by the civic center area. We believe that Sserious consideration should be given to the adaptive re-use of the Virginia Dare Winery building as a fine arts museum. This would preserve this historic building and further the design concepts that are emerging along the corridor, would strengthen the desirability and placemaking along the corridor, and optimize synergistic opportunities already at the node of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. We will speak more to this in future documents and design concepts. Policy LU-5.1: Create a central business hub at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue, extending south to 4th Street, with higher-intensity office, commercial, and public/quasi-public uses. Discussion: To accommodate more office and professional uses in Rancho Cucamonga, Haven Avenue, between Foothill Boulevard and the City's southern boundary, is planned as the City's office district. The proximity to transportation, including the freeways, Metrolink, and the proposed Bus Rapid Transit system will benefit workers as well as reducing the need for the automobile for commuting. Comment: The business hub concept seems to be well underway at the subject corner and along South Haven. The status of the parcel at the southwest corner of Civic Center Drive and Haven Avenue would be good to know. The General Plan designation on this parcel appears to be Office with a Haven Avenue Office Overlay. Regardless, tiwe havedata have been collected ing data one mile north and south of Foothill Boulevard, and this corridor could be an important market for Foothill commercial, residential and BRT development. Policy LU-5.4: Promote a pedestrian friendly corridor where employees can walk to restaurants, commercial services, and other amenities in the area. Discussion: Haven Avenue is planned to accommodate a more pedestrian friendly 13 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis environment with retail and dining opportunities within walking distance so that employees and visitors can walk to amenities. Comment: While this policy appears to refer specifically to Haven Avenue, it could easily apply to the Foothill Boulevard corridor and perpendicular streets that feed to it. Enhanced bicycle access would also extend the market to F lithe corridor. It is our intent toThe City should further evaluate and, to the extent practicable, enhance bicycle use along Foothill Boulevard as part of an overall multi-modal approach that will broaden activity along the corridor. Policy LU-9.4: Ensure that infill development is sensitive and compatible with the design and scale of all adjacent historic properties. Discussion: Every act of construction is an opportunity to repair, enhance, or embellish a district. The best way is to create infill development that is sensitive to and inspired by the existing conditions. This includes materials, scale, and massing. Comment: We certainly endorse this policy. However, there appear to be limited "historic properties" along the corridor with the exception of the Virginia Dare building and a few others. We—also—hope toThe City should also look to broaden the concept of Foothill beyond the "Route 66" concept and iconography to include the modern and vibrant downtown nodes being conceptualized for BRT stations. Policy LU-9.5: Establish Mixed Use areas as higher intensity "urban centers" where there is sensitive integration of land uses, convenient modes of transportation, and a focused "sense of place" that emanates from the architectural and landscape design. Discussion: Rancho Cucamonga has a well-established pattern of suburban and rural development. The City has the opportunity to enhance this pattern with the development of more urbanized centers of activity within suitable locations. This General Plan provides detailed land use and design guidance for each of the Mixed Use areas, which are envisioned as concentrations of activity at carefully selected locations within the City. Comment: COur conceptualization is crystallizing along the lines of a "string of pearls" that are connected by a multi-modal transportation corridor that facilitate BRT use, as well as pedestrians and bicyclists. The dominance of the automobile has not yet conquered the corridor and adequate car (and truck) access can be assured but the General Plan appears to recognize the opportunities to optimize BRT and other alternative modes of travel. The establishment of new and the expansion of existing mixed-use development on the corridor will be directly responsive to SB 375 mandates and can substantially reduce vehicle miles traveled. The pearls and string can and should provide a diverse set of "urban centersvillages" or neighborhoods connected by thoughtfully rendered parkways supporting pedestrian and bicycle use. Summary General Plan Land Use Perspective Every community faces the dilemma of respecting the past and accommodating the present and future. In the case of Foothill Boulevard (Historic Route 66) the character of the corridor has always been one of movement, not destination. In the early years, the businesses were located to serve travelers, not adjoining residents, and even most new development follows the "community commercial model" as opposed to the more intimate neighborhood model. The road has always been a"corridor"but now is an 14 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis opportunity through the BRT and associated planning process to make itdiversify with a series of BRT- anchored "urban village" nodes'. a "Main Street". The opportunities that exist today to shape the future are based on a new model of movement— not the traveler, but the neighboring resident and employee, and the commuter; it is not only the private vehicle the "corridor" must now accommodate, but the mix of transit, pedestrians, cars, bikes. While it may be thought that pedestrians are only really relevant at the intersections, the increasing value and importance of walking encourages a more extensive consideration of the pedestrian corridor as well. The success of this enhanced and diversified "Main Street"corridor. today and for decades to come, will be based on itsthe ability to serve as not only a conduit, but also as an extended and connected series of dynamic neighborhoods with a context for commerce, and as an iconic "brand" for the city. But this new or broadened branding must reflect the vastly different forces that are shaping the demographics and commerce. Commerce and residents must coexist for the broadband mobility to work. And the methods of movement must incorporate not only the car but especially the BRT system, as well as bicycle and pedestrian mobility. Of course, the evolution of Foothill Boulevard is still related to movement and linkages, but today's movement is vastly different (bicycles, golf carts and NEVs, smart cars, cars, buses and especially the proposed BRT system), and the linkages must also evolve. This new broadband mobility must also be matched by broadband wi-fi with the BRT stops being hotspots that offer a full range access to the internet and the bus time of arrival, capacity etc. We will elaborate this concept in our next phase of planning. General Plan Community Mobility Element Vision Statement The General Plan Community Mobility Element Vision Statement sets forth three guiding principles addressing modes of transportation, economic development and a sustainable balance in land use patterns. The stated principles include: "We emphasize development of a balanced, integrated, multi-modal circulation system which includes sidewalks, bikeways, streets, equestrian and hiking trails, and mass transit. The system is efficient and safe, and connects neighborhoods to jobs, shopping, services, and active and passive open space." "We maximize the industrial economic development power of our rail and highway connections. The Foothill Boulevard, State Route 210, and Interstate 15 corridors are the core of our commercial development, providing both jobs for our families and revenues for our community services. Our economic base maintains a mix of cultural, residential, industrial, and local and regional commercial uses with stable development." 15 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis "We are dedicated to a sustainable balance in land use patterns (residential, business, educational, agricultural, recreational, open space, and historic uses) and supporting transportation." Vision Statement Relevance The GP Community Mobility Element Vision Statement identifies all modes of transportation as important to social cohesion, and economic development and prosperity. The last also references a "sustainable balance in land uses" that also supports transportation. The subject Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT study emphasizes the integration of future BRT along the full length of the corridor and its linkage with the Victoria Gardens development. The commercial importance of the corridor is also emphasized. Also, the extent to which land use patterns support the transport system is cited. These guiding principles are general in nature but seem to endorse the vision of a BRT route and associated facilities along the length of Foothill Boulevard. The integration of BRT into this discussion and/or greater emphasis on mass transit appears warranted. This is especially true in light of the emphasis on connecting to industrial and industrial land uses in the corridor area. Greater emphasis could also be made to explicitly supporting mixed-use development that places residential development in proximity commercial and other services along the corridor. Therefore, the third guiding principle could be re-written along the following lines and may be worth considering: "We are dedicated to a sustainable balance of land uses located in proximity to alternative modes of travel, with particular emphasis on bus and bus rapid transit, which better connect residents to employment centers and commercial services." Metro Gold Line Consideration has also been given to the General Plan discussion of the Metro Gold Line and its possible extension closer to the City. While this interconnection to Rancho Cucamonga is a worthwhile effort for purposes of further integrating interregional systems, its relevance to the subject Foothill corridor BRT system i&-appears limited. One of the goals of municipal planning is to achieve an optimum balance between jobs and housing. In this regard, the City is jobs rich in areas ranging from general and specialty retail, professional and institutional land uses, to a major commitment in industrial development. As the General Plan notes, the Metro Gold Line is best suited for travelers who wish to leave the City for destination to the west, including downtown Los Angeles. A future MGL station at Foothill and the Pacific Electric right of way would be well suited for that purpose. To this extent, a future connection to I the MGL via a Foothill BRT system would complement one another but at-e-is not integral to the success of either system. 16 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis The Bike Plan Class II Bike Lanes continue to be planned on Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. However, these are also routes identified for Bus Rapid Transit, as well as being major traffic arteries and truck routes. As planning proceeds for the Bus Rapid Transit corridors, it may not be possible or desirable to retain the bike lanes on these two streets. The Bicycle Plan provides various alternative and adjacent bike routes to Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue in the event that future conditions would preclude retaining the bike lanes on those streets — including Class II Bike Lanes on Arrow Highway and Church Street, a Class I Bike Path along the Deer Creek Channel, and a Class II/Class III Bike Lane/Street on Hermosa Avenue. While "The Bike Plan" states that the vision of a Class II bike lane along Foothill Boulevard may be incompatible with the planned BRT system, every effort should be made to find ways to preserve both through thoughtful and innovative and flexible design. Bicycle access along this roadway will be important to the success of the "destination neighborhoods" concept that is being explored and that we feel is a highly desirable outcome of this planning effort and the success of the future BRT system. Walkability Improvements and Pedestrian Amenities The General Plan Mobility Chapter says very little about sidewalks and related pedestrian mobility, and there is even less discussion regarding the integration of pedestrian facilities in commercial areas or along major corridors such as Foothill Boulevard. Reference is made to "street-adjacent sidewalks" and to the need for wider sidewalks. Other amenities are briefly mentioned but�-are such general terms that the discussion provide l4le-limited guidance. Policies call for minimum four-foot sidewalks but these are generally consider the absolute minimum and are not standard for most communities. Out—The broader conceptualization of multi-modal access along Foothill Boulevard will should advocate wider sidewalks with separation from the curb wherever possible. Sidewalk and other pedestrian-related issues are further discussed below. General Plan Roadway Designation Foothill Boulevard is designated a "Major Divided Arterial" in the GP Community Mobility Element, and two configurations for this roadway are delineated in the GP, both of which call for three travel lanes in each direction. However, while portions of the corridor do provide a total of six travel lanes, major portions provide only two lanes in each direction. At some locations, especially along the western portion of the corridor, the roadway narrows down to one travel lane, although additional lanes will probably be captured as development and redevelopment occurs. The eastern portion of the route is also planned on roads that are down to two lanes and in some cases one travel lane in each direction. These include Victoria Gardens Lane and Church Street. Where Church Street changes to Miller Avenue, and just west of Dolcetto Place, only one travel lane in each direction is provided. This is also true for southbound East Avenue. The number of travel lanes available has a significant impact on the "rapid" portion of the BRT system, which relies upon dedicated or "claimed primary" BRT lanes. The fewer lanes available, the less efficient is the BRT route and the more affected it is by other traffic on the roadway. This is probably less of an issue in the vicinity of Victoria Gardens and points east. 17 • Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis General Plan Transit Component The City General Plan recognizes BRT as an important component of the City's mass transit system, enhancing bus transit with ,more frequent service, fewer stops, and higher average speeds when compared to traditional bus service. Higher-capacity buses are also typical with hydraulic systems that lower bus floor to match with sidewalks and/or station platforms for quick boarding that also meets the needs of ADA users. As noted above, BRT buses frequently travel in dedicated BRT lanes and may have priority access and signal preference over other vehicles. The General Plan Transit Plan identifies the subject Foothill Boulevard corridor as a Bus Rapid Transit route and provides for BRT stations about every mile and at major intersections. The plan also calls,for a Transit Center at the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard and Victoria Gardens Lane, in proximity to the southwest corner of Victoria Gardens and a short distance north of Foothill Boulevard. The planned Transit Center would necessarily be located at the northeastwe&t corner of this intersection and within an existing Victoria Gardens parking lot. Possible Adjustments to the Foothill Transit Route As noted above, the Foothill BRT corridor route shown on the GP Transit Plan calls for the eastern last leg of the route to proceed east along Church Street/Miller Avenue, and then to proceed south on Eastern Avenue and thence east on Foothill Boulevard. This route bypasses an area of substantial commercial services and employment centers (mostly retail)between Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. We recommend that the City consider changing this portion of the route to bring the BRT south along Etiwanda, where it can directly serve a large area of existing and planned commercial development-at*l the associated employment centers around the corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. and existing and future residential. General Plan Mobility Policies The following Community Mobility Chapter(Circulation Element) policies have been identified as most relevant to the BRT corridor plan, are cited and are briefly discussed below. The policies and one goal and related "discussions" are in Italics, with our comments in plain text and noted as "comment". Policy CM-1.1: Provide a safe and efficient street system in the City to support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of the Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Discussion: The Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter focuses on coordinating land use and transportation decisions. The Chapter also addresses pedestrian accommodations in land use planning. Comment: This policy tries to cover it all and as a result doesn't really address any of the mobility issues in a meaningful wavas well as it might. As noted elsewhere, pedestrian issues are only discussed in very general terms in the General Plan ((w-ell,-it is a "general plan" after all), and walkability to and from a BRT station is essential to attracting users. Not only must such access be safe and efficient, it needs to be attractive and enlivening. Parkway and streetscape design plays an essential part in making the walking experience, whether to the ultimate destination or the BRT system, a desirable experience. Policy CM-1.2: Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. 18 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis Discussion: This policy recognizes that not all streets need to serve all transportation modes, but that certain streets may also need to fully allow for the efficient and convenient use by travel modes other than the automobile. Comment: This is an important policy for the proposed BRT corridor. The discussion says more and something different than the policy itself and could be more pointedly worded. For Foothill Boulevard, the BRT system can be the essential element to the type of people movement that directly supports the I desired mix of land uses at BRT-anchored nodes of development. The BRT system can support this concept much better than the accommodation of the automobile and this should be a high level consideration in the planning of the BRT system along this corridor. Policy CM-1.5: Implement street design standards. Modified standards may be applied where appropriate on arterial corridors relating to transit, bicycle facilities, sidewalks, and on-street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Discussion: This policy applies to both public and private roadways. Private roadways may be constructed with slightly reduced standards pursuant to the Development Code. The standards for various roadway types have been established to accommodate the forecast traffic volumes and functions of the existing and future roadways. Comment: This policy is essential to the corridor-specific design considerations that must be given to I Foothill Boulevard. Again, this is a very general policy, and along the subject roadway a hierarchy of priorities needs to be established with sound rationalization. Yes, we can accommodate through-traffic with emphasis on the automobile, but the corridor itself will suffer. This is not necessary in light of the relative focus of community and regional commercial on the east side and in proximity to regional I transportation links, and neighborhood-serving commercial on the west and in proximity to adjoining residential neighborhoods (their market). Specific to the goal of designing for an effective, efficient and I used BRT system, lithe City should prioritize design considerations in consultation with City staff and other stakeholders. Policy CM-2.1:Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide. Discussion: The Community Mobility Chapter supports alternative transportation options, including bicycling and walking that are sustainable modes and contribute to a Healthy RC. Comment: As discussed throughout this analysis, the implementation of this policy is integral to the success of a BRT system on this corridor. Foothill Boulevard should be viewed as a series of destinations and not just a way of getting somewhere else. Optimum access to the existing community and regional centers is well provided by I-10 and I-15, as well as via the 210 Freeway. Facilitating biking and walking along and adjacent to the Foothill Boulevard corridor will directly support the success of the BRT system without adversely affecting commercial activities along this roadway. Policy CM-2.7: Require new developments of more than 100 employees (per building or 19 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga • Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis per tenant/company) to develop Transportation Demand Management programs to minimize automobile trips and to encourage use of transit, ridesharing, bicycling, and walking. Discussion: Transportation Demand Management programs are aimed at reducing auto driver trips through the use of other modes, and thereby achieving a more balanced transportation system and reducing vehicular emissions. Comment: This is a very ambitious policy and establishes a low threshold requiring businesses to implement TDM programs. However, it very much supports the concept of the subject BRT system and non-motorized access to BRT stations. The effective implementation of the BRT system will not only reduce auto traffic, it will also enhance internal (intra-corridor) land use synergies and facilitate the concept of a string of distinct neighborhoods (pearls) at BRT-anchored nodes along the corridor. Policy CM-3.1: Consult with regional transit operators to maintain and improve the coverage and frequency of transit service in the City. Discussion: Continue to work with Omnitrans, Metrolink, and other transit providers to increase access to the public transit network. The outcome should be a system that provides a true alternative to single-occupant vehicles. Comment: We have already had very productive discussions with Omnitrans staff regarding their plans for the sbX BRT system and specifically how it will be implemented along Foothill Boulevard in RCthe City. The discussion portion of this policy again de-emphasizes the auto in support of transit, which will serve this planning effort. Policy CM-3.2: Support Omnitrans' expansion of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) into Rancho Cucamonga, along Foothill Boulevard, with stops at all major north-south streets, and with direct routing via Victoria Gardens. Discussion: Foothill Boulevard is an ideal corridor to expand BRT services. Many of the City's higher residential densities and major commercial retail centers are located on or near Foothill Boulevard. This corridor connects many regional destinations located throughout San Bernardino County. This General Plan envisions additional Mixed Use development along Foothill Boulevard and supports creating a more pedestrian friendly environment for this corridor. Comment: As with Policy 3.1, this policy directly supports BRT system development along Foothill Boulevard and the transit plan also reflects this concept. Note that we arethe recommendationding the to relocate+on of the last north-south leg of the route east of I-15 to he placed along Etiwanda Avenue instead of East Avenue. Also as previously noted, the BRT system may be an effective means of accessing Victoria Gardens for the closer in market; however, the three major regional freeways should be expected to serve the bulk of the community and regional traffic to this destination center. Here again, the discussion confuses Foothill Boulevard as a regional link or travel corridor, when the new emphasis should he oninclude intra-corridor land use synergies. Yes, the route will take travelers through the portion of the corridor located in RC the City but the creation of distinct shopping, employment and living neighborhoods at BRT station nodes will also make the corridor an attractive and desirable destination, one different from but as effective as Victoria Gardens. This will further 20 • • Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis I strengthen and diversify the City economy and extend its position as a commercial powerhouse in the region. Policy CM-3.4: Consult with Omnitrans to establish and maintain transit hubs at Victoria Gardens, Chaffey College, the Metrolink Station, and other locations as appropriate to facilitate use of transit and transfers between transit services. Discussion: Victoria Gardens, Chaffey College, and the Metrolink Station are some of the major activity centers in Rancho Cucamonga that can support transit services. Comment: Although beyond the scope of this analysis, secondary transit routes and stops will be important to the success of the primary BRT route along Foothill Boulevard. Clearly, efficient transit access to these major destinations can be facilitated by thoughtful secondary route locations. The concept of relocating the Metrolink station should also be given serious consideration, the current location being less than optimal for overall system integration. Policy CM-3.6:In addition to requiring private development to provide transit amenities, consult with regional transit operators to provide attractive and convenient bus stops, including shade/weather protection, seats, transit information, and bus shelters as appropriate. Discussion: Providing transit amenities will provide a more pleasurable experience for transit riders and encourage new users. Comment: This is an essential policy mandate and one that is getting thoughtful consideration by the project team. Again, the idea of BRT stations along Foothill Boulevard is making the stations and the lands around them nodal destinations, not just transfer spots. To the extent practicable, these stations should be designed as integral parts of the surrounding lands and land uses, which will be a guiding principle of design efforts. Policy CM-3.7: Continue to develop and maintain a citywide bicycle network of off-street bike paths, on-street bike lanes, and bike streets to provide connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, civic center/facilities, recreational facilities, and major commercial centers. Discussion: The Bikeways Plan, Figure CM-6, will be the basis for implementing a system of Class I, Class II, and Class III bike paths. The Trails Implementation Plan will be updated to maintain consistency with the General Plan. Comment: What might be added to this policy are the connection between Class I, II and III bike paths and non-motorized access to the BRT stations. Biking is on the rise and the climate in RC the C itv is conducive to its expanded use beyond recreation. Other GP policies supporting bike use and bicycle access should be viewed as an integral part of the overall BRT strategy. Policy CM-3.12: Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new development promotes safety,pedestrian friendly design, and access to transit facilities. Discussion: Rancho Cucamonga will continue to ensure that project site planning 21 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis incorporates the needs of the pedestrian by providing designated walkways from parking lots to buildings, between buildings, and to adjacent uses where appropriate. Comment: This type of policy should be a given to most urban design situations. The design concepts were workeding on and briefly discuss herein rely heavily on safe and efficient pedestrian access between BRT stations and adjacent land use While the auto and support facilities are not the "enemy", they can be significant barriers to the perceived safety of pedestrians and bikers, and can affect BRT use. The same is true of architectural design both at the stations and in more broad applications. Policy CM-3.14: Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional transit, including facilitating connections to transit. Discussion: Bike racks and lockers at transit stations and bike racks on busses allow bicyclists to connect to bus and rail services, increasing mobility. Pedestrian walkways and shortcuts that connect to transit stops can increase transit use. Comment: This policy is also a given and reinforces the idea that transit users need to feel safe and a considered part of the multi-modal mix, not just an after thought or add-on that is not well integrated with the roadway, or surrounding parking or land uses. The level of station support for bicycles needs further consideration given the potential demand for these facilities and the space they require. Policy CM-4.1: Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal operation measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Discussion: The City will provide traffic management and traffic signal operation measures and promote safe and efficient traffic signal timing at all existing signalized intersections. Maximizing traffic flow efficiencies at major intersections decreases congestion on roadways. Comment: This policy will be critical to the effective implementation of the BRT system along the corridor. Priority signalization and signal control will allow the BRT buses to maintain headway, which must put the "rapid" in BRT. Not all modes may benefit from this essential management and control protocol. The after thought in the policy seems to emphasize a bias toward the auto, which will need to be either reversed or neutralizedmay need to be clarified for its applicability to along Foothill Boulevard to make this BRT route efficient and desirable for use. Policy CM-4.2: Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the safe operation of all modes of transportation, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Discussion: If users do not feel safe, they will not take advantage of alternative transit systems. With Rancho Cucamonga's wide streets and high speed traffic flows on certain streets, it is especially important to be aware of the potential harm that could come to transit riders, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Comment: Yes, safety is an essential aspect of system design regardless of the mode of transportation. The discussion recognizes that wide streets and traffic speeds can frustrate pedestrians and compromise safety. They Wide streets can also require extended green time at crosswalks that can reduce green time 22 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis along the mainline (east-west). The thoughtful adaptation of Foothill Boulevard to BRT can have multiple benefits in terms of reducing auto traffic volumes, while affecting traffic calming and a pedestrian and bike-friendly feel along the corridor. Summary General Plan Community Mobility Perspective The General Plan Community Mobility Chapter does a good job of coordinating City planning with regional transportation planning being conducted by Omnitrans and SANBAG, which sets the stage well for development and implementation of the BRT system along Foothill Boulevard. This street is identified as a core area of commercial development but is also recognized as an area where higher density residential development is and should be supported. Finally, Foothill Boulevard directly supports and is in proximity to major corporate and institutional (civic, courts, medical, etc.) offices, as well as substantial areas of industrial development, all of which constitute major employment centers. While some portions of the General Plan identify the opportunities for enhancement of existing land uses and development of new "districts" along the corridor, a unifying concept for this roadway is still lackingin the making. There is also a pervasive subtle bias toward the automobile, which can be at the expense, of and efficienat and effectiveness of the future BRT system. The subject BRT and land planning effort is an opportunity to take the General Plan, Specific Plan and Omnitrans BRT plans to the next level and provide guidance for an integrated planning effort that creates a corridor that is awith a diverse series of destinations rather than simple a means of moving people through the community. The chapter's discussion of"The Bike Plan" states that the vision of a Class II bike lane along Foothill Boulevard may not be possible or may be precluded by the planned BRT system. Gur-This on-going planning effort will-should make every effortwork to contradict this conclusion through thoughtful and innovative and flexible design. We believe that bicycle access along this roadway will be important to the success of the "destination neighborhoods" concept that is being explored and that we feel is a highly desirable outcome of this planning effort and the success of the future BRT system. That the General Plan Community Mobility Chapter places too great an emphasis on Foothill Boulevard as a major through street and even assigns a "truck route" status to this roadway seems to conflict with the existing land use pattern along the roadway, and the other aspirations for development along it and in the vicinity. The Revised General Plan also does not appear topolicies can take emphasize taking adequate greater advantage of the numerous alternative routes available to carry through traffic and traffic that-destined for the Ceity's community and regional shopping destinations. More emphasis in this regard could be given to I-10, I-15, SR 210 freeway, as well as Base Line Road, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and City Development Code Introduction The discussion and preliminary evaluation of these two planning documents has been combined based on our understanding that the Specific Plan has been largely reorganized and repurposed in the City's new Development Code as set forth in Section 17.38 of the Code. Nonetheless, there has been value in reviewing the Specific Plan to trace the evolution of the City's thinking regarding the four planning 23 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis subareas that comprise it. Therefore, the following discussion first reviews the Specific Plan in general terms then moves on to the Development Code and its applicability, and opportunities and constraints as they relate to the proposed BRT route along Foothill Boulevard. Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan was development about 25 years ago in 1987. Since that time, much has changed along the corridor and at least two significant land development cycles have occurred along the corridor and throughout the City and the region. Emphasis is placed on its importance as a commercial corridor, and the later anticipated and realized Victoria Gardens center as a part of this commercial push was already anticipated. Four planning subareas were identified in the Specific Plan, including Bear Gulch, Vineyard, Old Cucamonga and Etiwanda. These planning subareas, which are identified as "districts" in the Development Code, which implements the 1987 Specific Plan, were envisioned as "activity centers" I located primarily at major intersections. Theyre are meant to have individual identities with a stronger urban character than was to be found at the time elsewhere in the City. Specific Plan Architectural Design: The focus of the Specific Plan was on four major planning components, including community design and architecture, circulation, land uses and implementation. Architectural design was assumed to borrow from existing "architectural determinants" and was strongly recommended as the drivers for design. This rather narrow perspective had the potential to place unnecessary and undesirable limitations on urban and architectural design within these planning I subareas. Circulation Planning: The Specific Plan called for a six-lane roadway along the entire length of Foothill Boulevard, with an emphasis on transportation systems management, divided roadway design and access restrictions and consolidation, and adequate side street access. However, the Specific Plan also identified Foothill Boulevard as an integral part of the regional roadway system, which places an possibly unnecessary burden on this roadway and limits it potential for adjoining mixed-use neighborhood development. The Specific Plan did recognize this conflict, however, and the subject planning effort may serve to help resolve at least some of these conflicts. Specific Plan Land Use Planning: With a defined planning area of approximately 560 acres, I development was dominated by strip commercial mixed with small scale office development, and constituted about 22% of the planning area. The area was also comprised primarily of a variety of small lots of diverse ownership, which made lot consolidation essential for Plan implementation. The planning area lacked character and was fragmented in appearance without a unifying set of characteristics. It also lacked community activity centers that might facilitate a more unified development of this important and valuable corridor. Right up front, the Specific Plan declares itself as an effort to establish the corridor as a viable regional commercial area. At the time of its drafting, this was the conventional thinking of how commercial development should be planned. It was also indicative of the high degree of regional competition for retail dollars and associated revenues that has driven the fiscalization of land use planning in many communities. I Fortunately, other important alternatives, including the concentration of regional commercial near I-15, 24 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis has taken some of the pressure off other portions of the Foothill Boulevard corridor. The planning subarea concept has evolved, although in a somewhat conventional way, but important opportunities remain to realize truly innovative and effective mixed-use nodal development in conjunction with BRT stations planned along the corridor; that this approach can achieve the original concept of a series of diversified neighborhoods. Implementation One of the major implementation measures of the Specific Plan was to be lot consolidation to assemble development sites of adequate size to achieve the goals of the Pplan. The City Redevelopment Agency was seen as the driving force for implementation, including facilitating a variety of financing for roadway and infrastructure development, and as a means of providing incentives to attract the desired type and scale of development. Most recently, the purpose, applicability, development regulations and development standards for the four Specific Plan subareas have been integrated into the City's new Development Code and are identified as Section 17.38.060 Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District. City Development Code We have reviewed the City Development Code on two levels, the first being an overview of permitted uses and intensities, as well as development standards and guidelines. The second part of the this review has been to consider the Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning Districts and to identify any particular constraints and opportunities relevant to developing land use and planning concepts at identified "opportunity sites" that will best support the development and use of the BRT system. Specific sections are cited and observations made on how they may affect the proposed BRT project. Section 17.130.020 Site Plan Design A. Existing Site Conditions. Existing site conditions such as mature vegetation, slopes, drainage courses, rock outcroppings, and views should all be considered as possibilities for inclusion in the project. Use of valuable existing site elements will assist in formulating a focused design theme, such as: 1. Standards i. Preserve existing, mature trees where the drip-line is outside of the proposed building footprint unless it can be demonstrated that other development standards cannot be met(e.g. parking). ii. Provide a buffer where a non-residential development adjoins residential property by not exceeding the height of the residential structure, providing additional setback at a ratio equivalent to the additional height and/or providing a landscape buffer. 2. Guidelines i. Relate the location of site uses with adjoining properties to avoid possible conflicts and take advantage of mutual potentials. Comment: This is almost a meaningless statement. The term "compatible" is too vague and its meaning should be further elaborated; elsewhere there is a statement about linking parking areas on adjacent properties, and linking pedestrian access. What areThe term "mutual potentials" should also be 25 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis better defined? This shouldand made more emphatic so developers know they are part of the whole, and must make contributions to the whole. The difficulty is that past piecemeal strip development has been implemented without before current adjacency requirements were adopted, which precludes or makes difficult implementing design remedies. Recommendation: In the development standards and guidelines we will recommend, specifics will be given that provide concrete guidance regarding the relationship of the building type and anticipated uses with those existing or planned on adjoining lands. ii. Consider street setbacks on adjacent properties. While variety is generally desired, the street must function as a whole and the setbacks must relate. Comment: Once again, this "prescription" is really not one and ismay be too vague to effectively implement. If the goal is the street, then establish a "build-to" line so that each part contributes to a clear whole. This approach requires a definitive statement that better defines the street/building relationship, which may vary with differing types of development. In some instances, the building facade and its articulation may be integral to the development of the "public realm" portion of the development, as in the case of sidewalk dining and cafes. Recommendation: In the development of recommended standards and guidelines, we will describe potential adjoining uses and will concretely state the role of the building in defining and contributing to the public realm. This approach will more clearly define the relationships and better assure that future development proposals at BRT station nodes optimize the relationship of the building and its use to the adjoining public realm, whether it is on the street or within the context of a mixed-use project. iii. Preserve existing, mature trees as a focal point. B. Building Orientation. Placement of the buildings shall be done in a manner compatible with surrounding existing and planned uses and buildings. Comment: Once again, this is a statement that communicates no reallimited meaning of the term "compatible". •' . : - - .-. If it is left to the developer to define then no "code" is needed because none really exists to impose on thee development. Recommendation: Again, we will describe and illustrate concepts of building orientation that are concrete and can provide meaningful guidance to the future development plan. The following standards and guidelines apply: 1. Standards i. Arrange buildings to create plazas; Comment: It is essential that we define what a "plaza" is. Most developers refer to leftover space as plaza or simply plunk down a corner cutback or open area without consideration to how it will function and what its relationship will be to the buildings and the streets that delineate it. This is how we end up with graphically pleasing plans that lack functionality when built. Frequently, these "plazas" are out of scale, have no or little relationship to their edges and adjoining uses, and end up not inviting but distancing the retail or other activity from the street. 26 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis Recommendation: Historic or Congress fib New Urbanism (CNU) typologies should be cited in development standards and guidelines so that the purpose (people gathering), the size (anticipated usage related to location within streetscape and development — generally smaller is better), and the I orientation and access. Plazas needs to be spatially defined and also fluid, and should have boundaries that "hold" or "embrace" the space, providing a sense of enclosure without being cut off or claustrophobic. These characteristics also importantly serve to communicate the change in "space" when one crosses an imaginary threshold that defines the plaza as opposed to the rest of the open space adjacent to it. A serious explanation of an acceptable plaza should be included so the end result is an actual place. ii. Create direct and logical pedestrian connections between public sidewalk and the primary entries of each occupied building on the site. Comment: This is . ell intendedwell intended but too general and therefore essentially meaningless in the context of development at the street or along a corridor. There are larger design issues that should address building siting within the context of sidewalks along public streets or those connecting parking lots with the buildings they serve. Recommendation: The logic of pedestrian connections will be more thoroughly defined and may also be illustrated. So too will be the relationship of the building to the public street and hence the associated pedestrian access. Building an interesting and even enticing connection between the street and the building must not always be direct, but can be somewhat circuitous if the way finding is clear. This can provide a change in space and atmosphere between the public realm and the environment created by the development. We will attempt to illustrate this and will better define the range of relationships that should be addressed in mixed-use development along the corridor and in differing situations. iii. Provide additional setback, as needed, to protect solar access of adjacent properties. Comment: This is not really a standard and lycould be an obstacle to effective site planning and architectural design unless the"solar access" is better defined. Recommendation: Solar access is important on several levels, including providing sunshine onto a plaza or courtyard where outdoor use is being encouraged. It can also be associated with the assurance that opportunities for day-lighting of interior space is not limited or precluded. Finally, and where most typically thought to apply, solar access is that which allows the installation of solar thermal or electric panels to capture and use as a renewable resource. We will define theThe various aspects of solar access that must be considered both for adjoining properties should be defined but especially within new, integrated development. Clarity of descriptions and supporting illustrations will help to assure that both internally and on adjoining lands solar access is effectively respected and protected. 2. Guidelines i. For multiple buildings, vary placement to avoid parking areas that dominate streetscape. Comment: This is too vague to provide effective guidance. There are numerous examples of this "principle" being applied in a manner that chops up and well proportioned development site into a master site plan with buildings that do note relate well to one another, and one which results in convoluted and even hazardous parking lots and circulation. 27 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis Recommendation: If the circumstance calls for the placement of buildings that to create a street frontage with parking in the rear, state it. If the desire is to provide more room along the public street space and maintain more expansive views by interspersing building pads, state that. A more important consideration, and one we will elaborate upon in our design concepts, is the integration of parking with buildings, points of access and the street. Also important will be determining the real parking demand and not simply applying the Code, ULI or other standards that may result in a level of parking that is only needed once or twice a year. Finally, we will elaborate on how new and existing development can optimize a plan and program of reciprocal parking within the context of thoughtful site planning that places parking at convenient locations and also is attractive to visitor who access the site on foot, by bike or from a transit station. ii. Avoid "strip-commercial" appearance where buildings are plotted in a straight row with parking along entire street frontage. iii. The setback from streets and adjacent properties should be directly proportionate to the scale of the proposed building. Comment: Once again, if street frontage is desired and dictated by the use then define the "build-to" line and state the minimum and maximum building heights. Minimum heights should be set I because without enough heft te--or presence along the street frontage, the amorphous street corridor dominates the spatial and ordering experience. Recommendation: Along Foothill Boulevard, the height at major intersections might be a minimum 40-foot (3 stories) and a maximum of 70-foot high (six stories). If this is the case, then the corner configuration must be defined (chamfered a la Barcelona, re-entrant corner) and all four corners should be the same to create the spatial identity of the intersection. This is a very effective place-making strategy where it can be executed. iv. Setback larger buildings to balance the scale and protect solar access. Comment: This is a sterotypical widely applied planning recommendation that has resulted in development that provides little relationship between buildings and the street. Such a general rule leads to monotonous site plans that are found all over Southern California and which have homogenized the treatment of the public street. To the extent some areas of SoCal have high summer temperatures and shade is at a premium, larger buildings along the street can be an asset and not a detriment. Recommendation: If the boulevard experience/identity is sought then there should be opportunities for more building siting along the street. This would be especially useful along the west end of the corridor where on the north side of the street low density residential is prevalent and relatively close by. In such an instance, whether existing or planned for the future, buildings along the street can enhance the commercial boulevard feel while better buffering nearby residentiairesidences. v. Place buildings to provide the most aesthetic public views. Comment: This is also a gratuitous and meaninglesatoo general a statement to he effective; aesthetic views of what?more definition is needed. The built environment is not the aesthetic enemy of the community. 28 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis Recommendation: On the contrary, more attention needs to be paid to the quality of building design, and quality design does not necessarily translate into significant (or any) additional building costs. But quality design does require the employ of better sensitive and innovative architects, land planners and landscape architects. This is not to say that view corridors to mountain views or other natural and scenic amenities are not desirable. In the present case, the corridor is also already recognized as an "urban space" and as such warrants true urban design principles, not conventional suburban sliced treatments that seems to evade or escape the built environment. C. Access/Circulation. The access and circulation of a development should be designed to provide a safe and efficient system, both on and off the site. The following standards and guidelines apply: 1. Standards i. Minimize the vehicular crossings of primary pedestrian pathways between the public sidewalk and the primary entry to buildings. Comment: This standard is unclear and appears to try to address the potential for on-site drive lanes to cross the pedestrians' primary route of access to the building. If this is the intent then further elaboration is warranted to better clarify. Recommendation: There is little question that access consolidation along Foothill Boulevard will be essential to preserving roadway capacity along the road for all users and especially the BRT system. And yes, it will also be important to the creation of a pedestrian experience that feels safe, enjoyable and well served by thoughtful streetscape treatments, including sufficiently wide sidewalks, landscape and other buffers between curb and sidewalk. Depending on the location of BRT stations, it may be necessary to provide protected pedestrian access to median-sited stations that serve BRT traffic in both directions. In this case, the BRT stop must be consciously designed as a pedestrian-friendly "gateway", and visual/amenities clues need to be a part of the stations design, whether they are on the street or on private property. ii. Create safe, continuous, pedestrian routes between the public sidewalk and primary building entrances Comment: This standard is meant to be obligatory but is difficult to implement in many instances. One problem is the conventional thinking of many retailers that parking needs to be in the front of the building for both perceived accessibility and as an advertisement of the business. Recommendation: With the creation of the BRT-related ex-pan-de -nodal urban eweifefinient villages along the corridor there will be more opportunity to provide direct access to the building for pedestrians regardless of the point of origin (car, BRT bus, on foot or by bike). Consolidated access drives will help and side and rear parking will also allow for less travel lane/sidewalk conflicts. A greater emphasis on buildings fronting the street will also avoid this issue. iii. Where feasible, share access with adjoining properties. New developments shall connect to existing access points when available. iv. Align access with existing driveways, intersections, or median openings. v. Provide two means of ingress and egress, not including emergency only access. vi. Avoid dead-end parking aisles. vii. Access points must conform to the City's access control policies and standards. 29 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis viii. Maintain adequate sight lines for motorists at intersections and driveways. ix. Incorporate emergency vehicle access / fire lanes into the access/circulation plan rather than considering emergency access separately. D. Pedestrian System. Project should provide a safe, comprehensive and connected pedestrian system. The following standards apply: 1. Standards i. Include a connected pedestrian circulation system and accompanying plaza and patios as an integral part of a unified site design. Comment: Once again, this type of directive is too vague and does not provide meaningful guidance much less serve as a development "standard". Such a directive will not be applicable in many instances and if forced can result in a gratuitous and wasteful use of lot area that is infrequently or never used. Recommendation: Plazas and patios need to be described and defined. Concrete examples and some form of true standard needs to be developed if this is to be a design standard for general application. We will provide definitions of this type of design element and will provide criteria for when and where their application to the design may be warranted. ii. Provide for the safe and orderly transition of vehicular and pedestrian traffic by means of clearly identifiable and attractive walkways. Comment: This is largely a repetition of an earlier "standard" but seems to be emphasizing clarity and attractiveness of pedestrian paths and vehicle lanes. If so, OK. Recommendation: Please see our recommendation under item ii. of"Building Orientation. It should also be incorporated into the concept of breaking up large parking areas into defined "parking courts." Perhaps two double-loaded bays by 14 cars (140' x140' — 50 cars), for instance. Then perhaps the in-between area can incorporate a pedestrian passage that also serves as the detention area (think walkway over cobble or striped pavement). Also, as noted before, consideration should be given to reducing the parking requirement; establish maximum parking count, not a minimum. iii. Clearly delineate on-site pedestrian walkways with special pavement, landscaping, and lighting. iv. Connect the on-site pedestrian system and open space with the areawide pedestrian and open space network. Section 17.132.030 Commercial, Office, and Industrial Development The majority of design standards and guidelines for commercial, office, and industrial development are provided in Chapter 17.130 (General Design Provisions). This Section contains only those provisions that are unique to commercial, office, and/or industrial development. A. Special Site Design Provisions 2. Guidelines 30 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis i. For commercial projects, give special attention to creating pedestrian scale and an inviting place for pedestrians to shop. Comment: This statement is too vagueshould be further elaborated and made more direct. "Pedestrian scale" is generally thought of as the height of buildings, but the real issue is the vast and amorphous space that surrounds the buildings; a good example is the .oversized "plaza" at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Scale, enclosure and threshold, as well as other design considerations are essential to the effective creation of this type of space. Recommendation: The real issue is to create a defined/experiential outdoor realm (room, plaza, piazza, piazzetti, corridor, mews, lane). The buildings then serve the purpose of defining the edge of those outdoor realms, and their height should not be so important because the experience of the pedestrian is densified at the pedestrian realm (8' wide x 12 — 16' high). The buildings can be 3 to 6 stories high if the facades are articulated correctly, and the pedestrian realm is interesting—there is some action there, some reason to be there in the first place. ii. Site amenities, such as walls, hardscape, street furniture, trash enclosures, lighting, and monument signs, should be designed as part of the total architectural package for the project. iii. Integrate signs into the architectural program. B. Parking Areas.The following standards and guidelines apply: 1. Standards i. Screen parking areas from public view with mounding, landscaping, low walls, grade differentials, and building orientation. ii. For parking areas, include one tree for every three parking stalls for shade. Comment: These standards can heir is problematic and of questionable efficacy in any event. This prescribed tree density is very high, and trees in the middle of parking areas are brutalized stunted by a lack of surrounding soil and the typical excessive over-trimming by landscape maintenance crews. Even if properly maintained, at this density there is substantial expense in the form of maintenance and water demand. Recommendation: If trees are to be an integral part of the parking lot design, their spacing should be a function of the species to be used and not subject to a standard fits all sizes approach. A moreAnother valuable and timely alternative is to provide shading (which is the point) through the provision of shade structures that integrate solar photovoltaics. In this way, the shade structure will do its job with minimal maintenance and no water demand, and will generate a revenue stream for the project owners. By applying tree-shaded parking in proximity to the building, where solar access will be less in any event, the trees can serve to soften and complement the building. 2. Guidelines i. Distribute parking evenly throughout a site instead of concentrating all in one large parking lot. Comment: This is such a somewhat too general a statement that-and its application is-can he hard for developers to apply or planners to judge. The amount of parking aside, the placement of parking is defined by the needs of the business employees and the convenience of the shopper. Just a cursory 31 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis review of commercial and industrial area parking shows that adherence to such a general guideline can yield a wide range of undesirable results. Recommendation: As we have noted before, it is better to define the limits of parking both in terms of maximum number of spaces and in general locations. For instance, how many spaces should go I in a "car court", how many in front of the building, how many in back or on on the side, and how many overall. ii. Consider the types of users desired and plan the project accordingly rather than trying to maximize building floor area. iii. Parking areas should not be the dominant element in the overall design of a project and should be designed to minimize visual disruption. Comment: "Don't do this" is not really a guideline, and such a vague prescription/prohibition is simply not realistic. Most site planning parking design strategies almost always dominate the site because conventional office and commercial developers insist that there be substantial parking on the street-side (typically the entry-side) of the building. The Victoria Gardens with its faux Main Street is an alternative, but for something like this to work, the development off Foothill Boulevard has to be based upon a two-sided entry street drive where the storefronts face the entry drive, not Foothill :Boulevard, and not the parking areas. Recommendation: As noted elsewhere, we will provide draft parking planning standards and guidelines that are responsive to the mixed-use development opportunities we will be conceptualizing during the next phase of this project. These will provide concrete design standards and guiding principles that will be explicit. iv. Parking areas should be screened from streets through a combination of mounding, landscaping, low-profile walls, and grade separations. v. The design of parking areas should also minimize auto noise, light and glare, and ambient air temperature. This can be accomplished through the use of sound walls, general location, use of well- designed lights, and landscaping throughout the parking lot. D. Pedestrian Orientation 1. Guidelines i. Colonnades or loggias and other covered walkways or structures that provide shade to pedestrian spaces shall be utilized whenever possible. Comment: This is stated as a standard rather than as a guideline. In the low desert areas such a recommendation may be OK but is this really important to development in RCthe City? Will the determination of"whenever and-possible"? Would this be applicable to all pedestrian walks serving in- line stores greater than 40 feet and facing all compass points`'.- Recommendation: Rather than attempting to dictate architectural design, the guidelines would better serve if they defined the problem, if there really is one, and better describe a variety of design concepts that can be adapted to a variety of architectural styles. If there is room for such structures there is also room for trees that can serve the same purpose. We will specifically address this issue in concrete but appropriately open option terms in our conceptual designs standards and guidelines. 32 • Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis ii. At street level, the use of building materials and building details that relate to human activity. shall be required where appropriate. Comment: It is not clear what this means. There is some implied concern, either aesthetic or functional, but what the intent is and what "human activity" is being referred to is unclear. Recommendation: We will develop Ggeneral design standards and guidelines that address the issue of building materials and their application should be further elaborated and graphically supported. There may be issues of building protection, quality of facade articulation, building and hardscape materials, etc. that should also be considered. iii. Convenient pedestrian circulation shall be provided throughout all projects to connect public streets,parking areas, and public transit facilities with buildings and pedestrian open spaces. iv. Open spaces shall be integrated with pedestrian walks and defined by landscaping and other elements to create a sense of place. v. Where possible, open spaces shall be accessible to the public. vi. Street Furniture. Benches, light standards, kiosks, drinking fountains, trash receptacles, and other street furniture in on-site open spaces shall be designed in a coordinated fashion to enhance the appearance and function of the site and open space. Pedestrian areas shall be highly visible and well lit. Section 17.132.040 Foothill Boulevard This section establishes parameters within which the community character for the entire Foothill Boulevard Corridor can be created. To do so, a number of issues and design concepts have been previously explored. However, at the core of all discussion and investigation has been the attempt to define community character in an accurate, comprehensive, and pragmatic manner. The Community Design Guidelines are primarily focused on the creation of aesthetic character. The purpose is to create a visual environment that evokes a distinctive and unifying image, which is unique to Rancho Cucamonga. To accomplish this task, the Foothill Boulevard Corridor must first distinguish itself from other major thoroughfares in nearby communities and, second, it must serve as a visually unifying concourse that links the entire community of Rancho Cucamonga. Lastly, it is important to have a design statement for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor with each contributing community design element skillfully orchestrated to promote a contiguous, cohesive, community design image. Comment: The first principles should be the definition of the corridor itself, followed by the net be aesthetic, but rather definition of the corridor itself The use of the term "corridor" is instructive because it means an enclosed linear passageway. For a traffic corridor in strip center sub-urban design, the vertical curb is the defining element, later supplemented by street trees, streetlights, and "pad" buildings. But nowhere is the vertical edge of the corridor established because it staggers back-and-forth from big box (set back >300 feet), parking areas with low shrubs and trees (a soft edge which is not of interest, but pleasant), pad buildings (set back 30 feet), monument signs and older big pole signs, and I interspersing of low utilitarian buildings from years ago when the ROW was 80' feet. Recommendation: To create identity, the corridor should read like a defined, linear space. The fill-in efforts with street trees and banners along the parking lots is OK, but at the development entries and especially the intersections, the first priority should be to create a strong vertical definition of the edge of the public realm. The buildings should be placed at a "build-to" line, should have a height of 33 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis parapet a minimum of about 36 feet, and should be long enough to read as more than one small retail outlet. A. Applicability. The provisions of this section shall apply to all Foothill Boulevard Districts, unless otherwise specified herein. Any addition, remodeling, relocation, or construction requiring a building permit within any Foothill Boulevard District is subject to Site Development, Minor Design Review or Major Design Review. B. Image Enhancement Features. Community image is related to the way people experience the City- - driving through it, observing its natural qualities and the character of it's buildings, walking through commercial areas, and visiting specific destinations. The best communities have the following memorable image enhancement features: 1. A clear sense of arrival through a distinct change in landscape, hardscape, built areas, or special entrance monumentation features. Comment: Again, as with much of the standards and guidelines, these seem to anticipate more of the large-scale neighborhood and community scale retail outlet and less of an intimate, mixed-use development that is more desirable if one is trying to create an intimate urban environment. The use of hardscape is often a replacement for integrated design if it is not a part of and derived from the design of the buildings and the site plan. Signage is also a poor tool for creating areas of distinction and can lead to an unsightly visual clutter. Recommendation: Clearly, different buildings or developments should differentiate from one another but hardscape is generally an ineffective (but common) approach to providing identification. This is due to the plan-view conceptualization of development, the mistakes of which do not become evident until the project is built. Once visitors are on the corridor, the visual diversity provided by great buildings and effective landscape treatment will help create a destination; people will realize that they are where they want to be and will be interested in taking in more of the full Foothill Boulevard experience. 2. A civic, commercial, or cultural public urban open space, which defines the activities, history, commerce, or natural/manmade features which the community as a whole values. Typical public urban open spaces consist of plazas, courtyards, urban paseos, market streets, historic landmarks, and public parks. Comment: This concept should be developed further, citing examples along Historic Route 66 that already exist and how they do or don't function in the way desired. Recommendation: It is our intent to provide a description and illustrations of urban design elements that should be integral to the BRT stations and the planned mixed-use projects that provide the character-defining aspects of these developments and of the Foothill corridor. Identifiable districts, as set forth elsewhere in the Ddevelopment Code and originating in the Specific Plan, will be elaborated in our design phase. The overall design concepts, including the ideas for site planning and architecture, are where the"aesthetic" may help define the district. 3. A clear organization of streets, and landmarks which gives people a sense of direction and orientation. The extent of confusion in traffic circulation, and the amount of congestion increasingly figures in people's perceptions of cities. 34 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis Comment: Wayfinding appears to be the issue and along the corridor this should be made clearer by distinctive urban design elements, especially at BRT stations and associated urban villages. Recommendation: Perhaps a "landmark" is created that is a meaningful urban-scale element, and the nearby buildings cue off the landmark in some way. Iconic buildings, towers and other elements can help in this regard. We will consider the need for and appropriateness of BRT station flags or banners that alert users to the approach on the stations, while closer in we hope to elaborate on Omnitrans designs for the E Street leg of the sxB station and provide design concepts suguestions that allow the RC-City's BRT stations to be distinguished from others along the route. The development of new and the enhancement of existing opportunity sites should incorporate buildings of height and scale, as well as distinctive architecture that they too serve as landmarks that contribute to the creation of the tied string of"pearls concept we hope to develop. 4. A sense of uniqueness. This quality can be derived from a single feature, a district-wide theme reflecting ethnic or historical themes, or an event, which is staged in a special place each year. 5. A sense of place in a shared past which gives people a sense of belonging. C. Community Design Vocabulary. In an effort to provide a unique community image for the Foothill Boulevard Corridor, a variety of existing or proposed image enhancement elements will be provided or enhanced and designed to increase corridor identity. Vocabulary of these image giving elements include the following: 1. Activity Centers. Activity Centers are points of intersection at major streets or landmarks along the Foothill Boulevard Corridor. As such, they are points of concentrated activity, which give identity to individual subareas. Major Activity Centers located contiguous to the Foothill Boulevard Corridor include the areas surrounding the following intersections: i. Foothill Boulevard at San Bernardino Road ii. Foothill Boulevard at Vineyard Avenue iii. Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue iv. Foothill Boulevard at Hermosa Avenue v. Foothill Boulevard at Haven Avenue vi. Foothill Boulevard at Milliken Avenue vii. Foothill Boulevard at Rochester Avenue viii. Foothill Boulevard at Day Creek Boulevard ix. Foothill Boulevard at Etiwanda Avenue x. The Activity Center at Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road is a more rural, informal, village design concept. The specific design of the intersections for the Activity Centers between Vineyard and Etiwanda Avenues is within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. Comment: This section is emblematic exemplifies of the weakness need for of-the Development Code in settingto better set f o r t h crud define i b and illustrateing the terms that will create the desired "boulevard" effect. It is not enough to simply state that the desired effect is "activity centers". These need to be conceptualized, characterized and described. 35 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis Recommendation: The first step is to define and densify the intersections so that there is some activity that in fact can be "centered" upon. What the Code implies here is the intersection and the related mixed-use development around it. But what is not stated is that in addition to the buildings and businesses, a "CENTER" of activity needs to be created that is recognizable, memorable, alive, and connected. This section of the Code should take a stab at identifying the distinctive stylistic elements, color, material, or other element that makes one such center different from another. As a pictorial example, imagine that the colors of identifiable and regularly applied elements from east to west go from yellow, green, blue, and violet. Each element within the complex of that area has the color as an underlying theme—you say to your friend"I'll meet you at Foothill and Vineyard, you know it's the one with blue buildings or banners (the blue district)". While this is an example that may be too bold for RC the City, it illustrates how such a concept would add to the festive character and color code locations, such as BRT stations and development nodes, along the corridor. 2. Suburban Parkway Transitions. It is recognized that the Foothill Boulevard Corridor will not become a totally pedestrian-oriented environment. Therefore, the five pedestrian-oriented activity centers listed above, will be linked together by "suburban parkway" transition areas. These parkway transition sections will consist of informal landscape treatments dominated by drifts of London Planes, California Sycamore, and Purple Plum trees. Other parkway characteristics include rolling turf berms and meandering/undulating sidewalks, which are designed, to complement informal landscape treatments. The parkway transitions will include enhancement areas that have special treatments with accent pavement in the travel lanes, median island, and sidewalks; street furniture, and accent trees. The specific design of the parkway transitions and enhancement areas is within the Foothill Boulevard/Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan. FIGURE 17.132.040-2 PARKWAY TRANSITIONS Private Development Setback Une '- _ - Iii,L _ L_ a « .-;; . ' ( I! y .w .,,.�/! -� ,7 x ✓.. :;11;, ,,,L-.7%; Fri - L'�_. .._... _........... Also }, e. v�r'n� . , �N Property tine F , t`'K .1 -r-z f.■IJ t Primary Parkway Tree ."::1 Mounded Turf (European Sycamore) j Accent Tree Foothill Boulevard 6'Meandering Sidewalk (Flowering Pfd Suburban Parkway Zone 75'Parkway Transition Zone 45'Urban Activity Zone . .• .■ Comment: This statement gives the wrong impression or, one that—implies that there will be discontinuity of sidewalks or other pedestrian paths. The net available area for sidewalk and landscaping appears to be the same. The schematic indicates that the sidewalk and parkway landscaping encroaches into private property, thereby requiring an easement on private land to secure adequate area for the pubic 36 • Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis realm. Presumably, this issue is not universal but occurs in certain areas of the corridor. Also please see our comments on the Visual Improvement Plan. Code Pages 17.132-49 2. Building Orientation. Placement of the buildings shall be done in a manner compatible with surrounding existing and planned uses and buildings. The setback from streets and adjacent properties is directly proportionate to the scale of the proposed building and those around it. Larger buildings will require more setback area for a balance of scale and for the protection of solar access to the proposed building and adjacent sites. Lastly, placement of the building should provide the most aesthetic public views. i. Orient/screen all auto-related facilities (i.e., working bays, storage, etc.) from public view. ii. Buildings shall orient their public entrances toward Foothill Boulevard as much as possible. Comment: This approach or directive in many cases may not be realistic and may be misleading to regulators and the development community. These directives can establish a front-back dilemma that in many cases will not be satisfactory to the tenant or the shopper. This is where entry drive orientation or public plaza orientation should be explored on a case-by-case basis both in terms of the proposed site plan and use. 3. Access/Circulation. The access and circulation of a development should be designed to provide a safe and efficient system, both on and off the site. Points of access shall be designed in conformance with the City's access regulations. The circulation system shall be designed to reduce conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian traffic, minimize impacts on adjacent properties, combine circulation and access areas where possible, and provide adequate maneuvering areas. Points of access shall not conflict with other planned or existing access points. Pedestrian walkways shall connect every building with public sidewalks. 4. Parking Areas. Parking areas should not be the dominant element in the overall design of a project and should be designed to minimize visual disruption. Parking areas should be screened from streets through combinations of mounding, landscaping, low profile walls, and grade separations. The design of parking areas should also minimize auto noise, lights and glare, and ambient air temperature. This can be accomplished through the use of sound walls, general location, use of well-designed lights, and landscaping throughout the parking lot. Utilize the concept of "tuck under" parking where it is not visible from Foothill Boulevard or from any other side street. i. Whenever possible, locate site entries on side streets in order to minimize pedestrian/vehicular conflicts. When this is not possible, design the Foothill Boulevard site entry with appropriately patterned concrete or pavers to differentiate it from sidewalks. ii. Parking access points, whether located on Foothill Boulevard or side streets, should be located as far as possible from street intersections. 37 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis iii. Design parking areas so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving cars. Minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross parking aisles. iv. Driveways and parking areas should be separated from adjacent sidewalks or landscaped areas by a curb not less than 4 inches high. v. All parking spaces shall be clearly outlined on the surface of the parking facility. In activity center locations, locate parking areas to the rear of the buildings. vii. Link individual project parking areas with on-site driveways, which are clearly identified and easily recognized as connectors. viii. New development projects shall delineate on all submittal plans where the vehicular connection to adjacent sites are located. The applicant must also demonstrate provisions for access easement for such vehicular movements to adjacent properties consistent with an approved master plan. ix. As a condition of approval, the applicant may be required to combine parking facilities and access to serve more than one individual project. x. Within suburban parkways, parking areas should be designed in a manner, which links the building to the street sidewalk system as an extension of the pedestrian environment. This can be accomplished by using design features such as walkways with enhanced paving, trellis structures, and/or landscape treatments. 9. Transit Improvements. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided if determined necessary by the Director of Engineering Services and Planning Director in consultation with the local transit provider. Comment: This is the only reference to transit or bus shelters in the entire Code. While the General Plan clearly anticipates the need for such facilities, the Development Code does not and--but should provide both standards and design guidelines for these facilities. Recommendation: Specific to the sbX BRT plans developed and being further elaborated by Omnitrans and SANBAG, we will provide concrete siting criteria, and discuss design standards and development concepts for the future BRT facilities along the corridor. These will be developed in consultation with Omnitrans and the City Public Works Department and should set the standard for future BRT station development. K Building Design 2. Scale. The mass and scale of the building needs to be proportionate to the site, open spaces, street locations, and surrounding developments. No matter what the scale of a building, setbacks and overall height should provide an element of openness and human scale. Multi-story buildings should be set back toward the center of the site or be designed in a stepped style. 38 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis Comment & Recommendation: This is a very important issue as it relates to the creation of an urban space along at least portions of the Foothill corridor. The balancing of scale and openness is always a difficult passage and one that cannot be adequate addressed through a single, monolithic standard or guideline. There is a fundamental disconnect between what we consider "human scale" and what is "urban scale." The human scale is measured by how a single individual relates to a single building. In the prevailing low-building ethos of SoCal suburbia, we are wrongly concerned that a'tall building is evil and not human scale. This is primarily a function of tall buildings being stand-alone anomalies, as opposed to a tall-building composition (think downtown Orange) where the taller I buildings (3 stories is tall?) define a public realm that is definitely pedestrian-scale, and the pedestrian realm (12'w x 12-16'high) is interesting. Generally, regulations want to limit height because height doesn't or is preconceived to not fit into an overall "district" or public realm, so we are concerned that the building will overwhelm the person. However, in order to create the "pedestrian experience" and the "urban setting", the buildings must be designed at a "roadway scale" or a "plaza scale." When buildings are designed along a major street or within a commercial center if the emphasis is on the parity of man-to-building (as suggested in "human scale") is the criterion, the buildings will be too diminutive to define the space of the roadway or plaza. The sensibilities of"human scale" need to be adapted to the urban corridor to emerge along the Foothill corridor. To address this need for a broader perspective, there needs to be three scales used to define the appropriate massing for buildings to create the desired "pedestrian experience." These three scales are, from large to small: Roadway Scale: the person in a vehicle, or on foot for that matter, needs to recognize that a significant vertical mass is creating both the destination and the boundaries to the roadway. In this circumstance, the typical, conventional commercial development is composed of a few pads along the roadway with parking behind, and extending to the core of the development comprised of 26 — 36 foot high commercial boxes at the rear of the development. The height and mass of the pad buildings provide no sense of"scale" to the roadway; there is no sense of a "public realm". Rather the spatial experience as viewed from the street and sidewalk is an amorphous and porous bubble that weaves in and out of the center, punctuated by an "entry statement" then a "pad" then a stretch of parking, then another "pad". There is no single or collective element that can hold its own with the typically broad roadway, which continues to dominate the space in a characterless, amorphous manner. The vertical-to-horizontal ratio of the typical arterial (120' ROW) is 1:8. This is sometimes improved by street trees, but overall the "corridor" is really a broad river of space on a mildly undulating plain. Roadway scale requires buildings that are three to four stories tall (40 to 50 feet) within 25' of the ROW. They can be "softened" with arcades, step-backs, and ins-and-outs (articulation) of the façade. But there must be a substantial architectural statement, a gravitas to the buildings being asked to create a sense of "corridor". What is important about these fronting buildings is that the rhythm and pattern of wall-to-window communicate an implied "place" within the building for the pedestrian that extends the outside into the structure in an organic way. The buildings need to tell a"story"of human activity whether the story is of an office worker, a teacher, a patient, a shopper, a resident—the important aspect is a sense that a person can project him/herself into the building and occupy it. This is one "downshift" in scale that is necessary. 39 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis Entry/Arrival/Destination Scale: the entry is not a sign! It does not matter if it is one a pole or a "monument". A sign is not an entry statement. A sense of arrival is created by a sequence of forms squeezing down the vehicular speed and increasing the complexity at the ground plane for motorists and others moving along the public realm. This. type of scale is defined by buildings on both sides of the road, probably in most cases without direct front door access (though this does not necessarily need to be the case). The street trees follow the road, there are sidewalks on both sides, and the buildings have display windows. This is an entry that could serve pedestrians, but unless the BRT is highly used and at the intersection, it is less likely to be used by pedestrians. Connection Scale: this is what is commonly called the "pedestrian scale" but it cannot exist without the other scales that distinguishes it from roadway scale/activity, arrival scale/activity, and strolling scale/activity. This is the string that connects the pearls and needs to have an organic, scalar relationship to the other two levels of scale. 8. The Pedestrian Experience. Architecture and outdoor space along Foothill Boulevard shall be integrally designed and oriented toward the pedestrian experience. The experience should be visually diverse, stimulating, and include activities that create a sense of variety and excitement. i. Site buildings to create new pedestrian spaces that complement and expand the existing pedestrian rights-of-way along Foothill Boulevard. This is accomplished by creating plazas and allowing wider sidewalks on Foothill Boulevard. ii. Site and design buildings to minimize pedestrian/vehicle conflicts and avoid locating driveways and service areas which interfere with the flow of Foothill Boulevard pedestrian movements. iii. Site and design structures to facilitate public access across sites where important pedestrian connections occur. Mid-block passageways from rear parking lots can be created through a fully developed internal paseo system. 121r 94• I 13 I xT 14' 4T I 1Y S tt' 11' t� t3' it' 11' S i i i t t ! ear Major Divided Arterial(Yid-Block) 125' t12 T1 � 4 � �r I ' 11• 11' t3` 1O 11' 11' 11• _ 11' 14' Ms I i i ' ♦ 0 Major Divided Arterial (Dual Left-Turn Lanes and Right-Turn Lane) 40 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis Visual Improvement Plan Introduction & Critique Rancho Cucamonga is a rapidly diversifying community and an emerging center for corporate headquarters, while hosting world-class regional commercial, major industrial and institutional development. So, RC is a business town, but it is also a "home town", a "college town", a "baseball town" and much more. With the push to unify the Foothill Boulevard corridor via BRT and an evolution as-at-1°f nodal urban centervillages, it can now become further evolve to become the sophisticated and dynamic "The Downtown"place to be in the region! The Foothill Boulevard Visual Improvement Plan was developed in the late 1990s and was adopted by the City Council in early 2002, following adoption of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan in 1997. The Visual Improvement Plan (VIP) takes a somewhat culturally and aesthetically monolithic view of the public realm created by the Foothill Boulevard right of way, based on the Historic Route 66 theme, stating that "it was known for its unique car culture of the mid-century, its creative highway signage, motels, trading posts, tourist traps, and service stations." With all due respect to history and America's car culture, these identifying elements alone will not "activate" the creation of-a modern, 21st century urban.c#a�r�village nodes along Foothill that can support and optimize a BRT transit system. The VIP states: "The purpose of the Foothill Boulevard/Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan is to develop a design specification plan that will set forth design concepts for the streetscape improvements within the public rights-of-way and entry areas along the entire length of Route 66 in Rancho Cucamonga." To the extent the VIP establishes the basis for subsequent design refinements and implementation, this Plan serves it's purpose. Fortunately, the VIP recognizes that the designs are "concepts", thereby not meant to be a straight jacket but a guiding document for subsequent design and implementation. There is noThe future is not brittht future for urban design that is stuck on nostalgia. This is an essential point in that the VIP appears to only really recognize the mid-20th century car culture and aesthetic, which continues to have a cultural recognition but at a level that is substantially less than the Plan would imply. To limit the aesthetic development of the Foothill corridor to Rt. 66 themes, icons and artwork risks stunting the type of creativity and innovation that is transforming cities in Southern California and across the country. Our appeal, therefore, is for a more open and inclusive approach to improving the visual character of the 41 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis corridor, one that invites diversity and sensitivity to a modern urban lifestyle that goes beyond the 1950s car culture. An Expanded Aesthetic The Visual Improvement Plan for Foothill Boulevard does not set forth aesthetic principles that have guided its development. Rather, it has latched onto vague notionsrestates impressions of what Historic Route 66 has meant for older generations, which are the primary market for this theme. It is more an "engineered" concept that sets forth hard design specifics such as pavement widths and tree well dimensions, paving materials and plant type prescriptions that are slavishly narrowly applied to the gateways and activity centers. The effect is more one of an interiors designer applying a limited element and color palette, but in this case to a variety of development opportunities along a seven-mile stretch of roadway corridor. To the extent it espouses any aesthetic at all, it promotes highly conventional "design concepts" that have been done and over done throughout Southern California. More sliced white bread is not what is needed to create a vibrant and dynamic down town along the Foothill corridor. Rather, the best aspects of the past can be married with the new and emerging concepts of urban life and urban transportation, which area especially applicable to the subject Foothill BRT transit and urban planning effort. The dominance of the car has had a disastrous effect ondoes not enhance the creation of a pedestrian or bicycle-friendly downtown, and while our love affair with automobiles will be with us for a long time to come, urban development necessarily must harken back to clean and efficient:transit and offer other alternative modes of travel. Babies and Bath Water Our team will further assess the design opportunities at the two gateway locations and associated planning subareas, as well as at the other subareas and opportunities sites located along Foothill Boulevard. We will extract and extend the best elements set forth in the VIP and will expand the aesthetic perspective based upon a vision of BRT and multi-mode transportation, and on the City's stated intent to provide a true urban, mixed-use downtown environment. The following represents a brief ''critique and recommend approach to the specific elements discussed in.the VIP. Entry Gateways The City is already distinctly different from it neighbors to the west and east, and overt statements of a shift in character should reflect the rich heritage and broadened aesthetic of the new RC, with less-more emphasis on the old and progressively more datedthat goes beyond the Route 66 theme. The Western Gateway (Bear Gulch Area) provides an important opportunity to take anti holistic approach to identifying the City's entries. • . -- . • • . '- • • • • - • - gateway area as well. The wWestern gateway area at Grove Avenue is ready for major redevelopment, with current old and inappropriate land uses for at such an important and high profile location. The substantial vacant and underutilized lands provide important opportunities of scale to do more than paste on a few conventionaltor improvements to enhance the appearance of this Ceity gateway. East Avenue has limited constraints and better "bones" on which to design an entry statement that 42 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis complements existing and future development, and that takes advantage of the long-term open spaces areas, including the drainages and utility corridors, that should be integral parts of the overall gateway design concept. Activity Centers The VIP references the eight activity centers identified in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, and again indicates that each (and apparently every one) is to serve as a focal point emphasizing the Historic Route 66 character, although that "character" is never reallycould be further described in the VIP. This idea should simply be dropped or substantially diminished as a part of the aesthetic treatment of these important development nodes. While beyond the scope of this assessment, it should be noted that the landscape concepts for intersections and the associated plans have the potential to create line of sight problems for traffic accessing Foothill Boulevard from side streets. Landscape planning should take into account required minimum sight distances and assure that adequate visibility is preserved. As a case study, the Foothill @ Vineyard intersection, with four different corner treatments,undermines the sense that the crossing is what is important as opposed to the individual developments. VIP treatments should emphasize the parts making a coherent, identifiable whole. All four corners share the same basic underlying elements and order but have not (perhaps yet) executed the VIP concept. Future I probabley redevelopment at northeast corner should reflect building and corner treatment on the northwest corner using similar trees and walls. It should be noted that the prescribed treatments are very much typical of suburban, low-level retail "center" development that is pervasive across Southern California. This approach does not create the type of urban environment that attracts pedestrians or creates sidewalk activity. While many cars are seen at the intersection, there are few pedestrians and fewer bicyclists. Suburban Parkways The VIP is very much entrenched in the suburban parkway concept that dominates the region, and again emphasizes the Route 66 theme to the determentdetriment of all other opportunities. It is uncertain whether the very limited landscape palette is to be applied along the entire length of the Foothill corridor_ If so, it will further homogenize its appearance, result in monolithic character and may frustrate wayfinding for drivers and BRT users. As a general role, thoughtful diversification of the streetscape creates distinct and identifiable districts and planning areas that allow residents and businesses to identify with a unique locale along the corridor. The use of on-street Rt. 66 pavement signage is expensive, will soon become discolored and does little to distinguish the area unless ione is flying over the streetfor the pedestrian or the clriver. Serious consideration should be given to limiting this type of pavement treatment to that already constructed. Foothill BRT and the VIP It should be kept in mind that Route 66 was built as part of the system of trans-continental linkages. Whereas the railroad and telegraph linked east and west coasts on a common/public system, Route 66 introduced privacy to the linkage.- Private motor cars (and motels) and private conversations (phone 43 Terra Nova/SCAG/Rancho Cucamonga Foothill Boulevard Corridor BRT Study Planning Document Analysis booths) made the linkage more fine-grained. Personal, individual mobility was king and was considered I an outward sign of freedom, affluence and individuality. I Today, the perspective for new generations of Americans is rapidly changing. The next generation of linkages is not hardwired in rail lines, roads or even airports, but rather in wireless mobile devices, broadband, social media and free-choice. Cars are less useful and even burdensome in an urban I environment where land is valued for living space, commercial enterprise, and parks and other open space. Therefore, the Foothill BRT system has to offer privacy along with common/public space. In a word, the BRT has to be personal and intimate at the same time. The physical elements of the BRT system have matched up with contemporary needs and expectations, to be "modem", obvious, and convey the sense that one is physically and conveniently"connected."This "connectivity" (linkage) includes: • -transponders for the bus driver to game the signal times, • Wi-Fi and GPS access for a rider to know exactly the place and time of the bus (how much time do I have?), • linkage to useful services nearby (secure bike storage, nearby NEV parking, coffee and donuts), and; • -a rewarding public realm surrounding the BRT (the experience from house to BRT has to be better than car commute.) Comments on VIP: Of course, the VIP is limited to the elements in the ROW, but I think theits recommendations are relatively meaninglesswill not be realized unless there is a commensurate effort to define the role of the private elements: buildings. Unless the role of buildings to define the "corridor" and the "intersections" or "nodes" is clearly articulated and regulated, ally-the pretty enhanced street-scape stuff will be lost in the amorphous and "soft" edges created by the small-scale pad buildings, the street trees, and the icons. All these are-tour-wimpymav lack the strength to achieve the sense of identity sought by the GP and VIP. Furthermore, the VIP is trying to dress up the pails of the corridor that do notdoes not go far enou1J h or provide the diversity needed to have an impact on the economic success of the Foothill Boulevard corridor. At future BRT nodes, Foothill Boulevard has the opportunity to actually achieve the goals of identity, vibrancy, diversity and relevance.y but the real tools are the FA-Rfloor/area ratios, the "build-to" lines, and the urban scale definition for intersections and secondary entry roads. 44 P268 DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JUNE 12, 2013 DISTRIBUTED UNDER SEPARATE COVER Exhibit B THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DP 7 L THE MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 12, 2013 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL To ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:00PM Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly X Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Donald Granger, Senior Planner, Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer;Mayuko Nakajima,Assistant Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary Mike Smith, Associate Planner; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner; Daniel Correa, Assistant Planner II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. DRAFT DRLIFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION altitiv V•1117 AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES L �40J RANCHO JUNE 12, 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 2 Luana Hernandez, President of HPARC said she is pleased to see the Mills Act application for the gas station. She said they are still working on the Chinatown house.She thanked the Commission and staff for their help. III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of minutes dated May 22, 2013 Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly- Adopted 4-0-1 (Howdyshell abstain) IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. B. MILLS ACT APPLICATION DRC2013-00384 - ROUTE 66 IECA - A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax for the Cucamonga Service Station, a designated Historic Landmark, in the Specialty Commercial District within the Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District located at 9670 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0208-153-05. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Daniel Correa, Assistant Planner gave the staff report. In response to Commissioner Wimberly, Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager noted that usually given dates and times of proposed improvements are listed as part of the agreement,however,because the owners are waiting for other sources of funding, those dates are not yet available. They will work with staff on the timeline and staff will also make sure they make scheduled improvements. She said as they receive funding, staff can bring back an update report(s), to note progress as it is made. Vice Chairman Fletcher noted that this project is exactly what the Mills Act is designed for. He said this is a situation where the group truly wants to restore the property and it is a good application. Commissioner Munoz said he is happy that this has come full circle and he is happy it is where we are now. He thanked Ms. Hernandez for her kind words. Chairman Howdyshell noted we have several structures using the Mills Act and it is very beneficial. Moved by Wimberly seconded by Oaxaca Adopted 5-0 to forward the Mills Act Contract to the City Council for final action. DffñpT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DRAFT ti �' AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES L RANCHO JUNE 12 2013 7 CUCAMONGA Page 3 V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION C. DEVELOPMENT CODE/SPECIFIC CHANGE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BUS RAPID TRANSIT STUDY DRC2012-00610 — COMPASS BLUEPRINT PROJECT. Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner, gave the report and introduced the PowerPoint presentation. Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager gave some background regarding the original study that was done in cooperation with SANBAG and SCAG using a grant to include Rancho Cucamonga along with several other cities to look at rapid transit which then opened an opportunity to apply for a second grant which allowed us to hire Terra Nova and to evaluate our plans and to develop a comprehensive report with respect to the BRT. The John Criste of Terra Nova, presented the section of the PowerPoint presentation followed by Mr. Young to address design issues associated with the project. Commissioner Munoz said as a City we need to think out of the box and move in this direction as it may be only 5-10 years out. He said we will tweak this plan as there are valuable ideas. He said we can be visionary and have a plan available when the crunch comes. Commissioner Wimberly concurred and noted we have been looking at live/work units for example in anticipation of this type of plan. He said what was presented is viable and as a city will have to do this. He said we will review what we have in place as far as structure and revise it. He said he believes it may bring future citizens to our city. Commissioner Oaxaca said it was an interesting report and noted the section about the City's regulatory documents that are in place that already reveal that some of the recommendations get to the core of where we would like to be in the future. It leads us to think about how we can tailor and create those places that work for pedestrians, cyclists and develop mixed uses and TOD's that work for this corridor and all must fall in line for it to work. He said he recommends that we think about how we can create those changes and change people's behavior-a difficult thing to do,but we have to start somewhere, he said he believes this is a good time to start. Vice Chairman Fletcher said he disagreed with much of what he heard and read. He said he is concerned we are going in a backwards direction in that the report is designed with the sole purpose to promote development to support public transit rather than to design public transit around our different lifestyles. He said this whole report is based upon creating dense communities to support transportation, which makes sense in LA or San Francisco but not here-he felt it was backward thinking. We built what the community wanted, the City has received national and local awards for that development, and this is not an ill-conceived community-people come here because they like it. He felt insulted by some sections of the report and felt the consultant missed the mark. He said he did not think this is what Rancho needs. He said he believed the comments in the report about the Visual Improvement Plan (VIP) were condescending and insulting; the consultants missed what "urban center" referenced. He said we used to be a rural agrarian community and that `urban' meant residential, not dense development. He said they totally ignored what the design of the VIP was DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 40, JUNE 12, 2013 CRANCHO UCAMONGA Page 4 designed for and they made light of our nostalgia;the themes of Route 66 were put down. He said the comments were arrogant, condescending and seemed insulting and failed to recognize the design, goals and`lifestyle'that Rancho residents desire. He specifically referred to pages 40-43 of the report. He took exception with remarks in the report made by the consultant such as, the VIP `promotes highly conventional `design concepts' that have been done and over done throughout Southern California. More sliced white bread is not what is needed...." And that the design elements of the VIP "are too wimpy to achieve the sense of identity sought by the General Plan and VIP...that do not have an impact on the economic success of the Foothill Boulevard." He said a single family home is the American dream and his kids want a house to raise their kids in, not a high rise apartment. He did not agree with the comments about the western gateway. He said he thinks our residents would be up in arms about high density development. He said he does not support the report and suggested the City Council not do anything with it. Chairman Howdyshell said many of her comments are included with what her fellow commissioners already expressed. She said with respect to the City gateways, she served on the Trails Advisory Committee(TAC)and they worked hard on the west side of the City. She said she does not want to change that. She said she does not want to see a lot of modification to the City. She commented that partnership is important; builders come here because they understand our philosophy and our lifestyle. She said she agrees with Vice Chairman Fletcher with respect to density and she is opposed to high density. She said we do need connectivity and transit and a way to get from point A to B but she is concerned about a lack of parking and we need to think about how we do it. She said we do need BRT but we have to be mindful of who is going to be the end user. She said this plan would be a major paradigm shift and will take a long time. She said this community was not designed with this mindset. Ms. Burnett, noted that the report is already scheduled for the City Council. The Secretary received and filed the report. VI. SCHEDULED MATTERS/PLANNING COMMISSION D. PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(EIR) DRC2012- 00049 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-00443, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2012-00444, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2012-00445, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2013-00305 and TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19454 - WALMART STORES, INC - An opportunity for the Planning Commission to receive public comment pertaining to the environmental issues to be addressed in an EIR for a proposed 189,411 square foot Walmart Super Store on 20.2 acres of land along with a master plan for a freestanding retail pad of 4,000 square feet on .56 acres of land (Outparcel 1) and additional 58,120 square feet of commercial/office lease space on a 7.83 acre parcel (Outparcel 2), located at the northeast corner Foothill Boulevard and Mayten Avenue in the Community Commercial Development District of the Terra Vista Community Plan —APNs: 0227-151-42, 43 and 45-48. • DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION L,Av AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES �M RANCHO JUNE 12 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 5 Donald Granger, Senior Planner, gave the staff report. He offered the groundwork for what a Scoping meeting is for;to identify the range of environmental items to be addressed in the EIR document. He said Ross Geller of Applied Planning is present and Walmart is represented by Donovan Collier and Sarah Compton. Donovan Collier of Walmart Stores said they are working with staff and are here to answer questions. Chairman Howdyshell invited the public to comment. Loretta Arenas said she is opposed because of detrimental effects on the surrounding community and local businesses Jacob Erwin said he lives in Terra Vista. He said he is concerned because of air quality due to more truck traffic. He said the air is already polluted. Eric Jirmenez had a concern about small businesses competing with large businesses. Sherry Stuart said she is opposed and questioned having a supercenter between two other nearby Walmarts. She said she is concerned about "Mom and Pop"businesses trying to compete. Liliana Ray said she is a resident of the Homecoming development. She said she has a concern about trucks and customers impacting her immediate neighborhood. She said the store is too large and they will have 24-hour-traffic. She said other stores are struggling and will close leaving empty retail areas. Michael Stewart said it will make traffic difficult and increase emissions. He noted the birds of prey can be found on the light standards in the area. Paul Melowtan questioned if the proposal is consistent with current land use policy. He said the site is adjacent to medium/low residential and he is opposed. Luana Hernandez said she is concerned about such a huge building. She asked why they are not expanding the existing Walmart store. Commissioner Munoz asked for clarification regarding what will happen to the existing store and asked if staff could address the land use question. He said there is some confusion and asked if there will be 3 stores (meaning the existing site would remain a Walmart in addition to the new store and the one located near Grove Avenue.) Mr. Granger said the project will require 5 entitlements:a General Plan Amendment, A Development Code Amendment for housekeeping, a Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit and a Tentative Parcel Map. DRAFT +,, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION b '� AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES �M RANCHO JUNE 12 2013 CUCAMONGA Page 6 Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said the issue of land use is already identified in the Initial study and will be addressed in the EIR. He also noted that the possible expansion of the existing Walmart Store will be explored as an alternative. What would happen to the existing site will also be evaluated in the EIR. Mr. Donovan said the existing store will be vacated. He said it will be surplus property and they are currently looking for developers for a re-use. He said the existing Walmart has parking and circulation issues and so they are trying to move to a more shopper friendly area in town. Vice Chairman Fletcher said his items include the builidng design, lot, landscape, and aesthetic visuals should be up to our standards as well as ongoing maintenance upkeep, and cleanliness. He said he would like them to sweep daily. He said the EIR should cover the cumulative effects and impacts on nearby residents. Chairman Howdyshell noted the proximity to the residential neighborhood;the 24-hour operation;the concern about traffic and noise;and sensitivity to the surrounding community. Mr. Flower said all the items of concern have been noted and that the public can stay informed as the review process progresses. VII. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION None VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned their regular meeting at 8:50PM. The Planning Commission adjourned to a workshop to continue their discussion of DRC2013-00124, an informational presentation and workshop regarding the design of residential development. The workshop was held in the Rains Room and those minutes will be prepared separately. rte- 2 r • Ir, k. Yk X ry }H 4 " art !tt S' *k'"Yi �� �- �0� ;r4,..""';A.i ..'-1 a z 'S t' f^ „ i? : , ›M Z CI Oi Q z t CI M ' *** , Z....4 1 < (i) Ce 0 0 i . m 2 �,W _ Z Q J t/1 0 0 U . n Z 2 N i n o� W Irl V 0 Q v7 ZZ _ OW Q 0 CO CC z a, Z 0 W N ino V J <� z z..... , . _1 0 CZ V Q a I IM a W � -,_-.4._ ‘• ig - 1,‘,, 11-- 2 cc Q o n ii.i 0 ifr, ,....._ .. • i , .....717,_. ii, i co 0 azi cia :„.. N w Immis sg V p i� �. a �0 . ,... ,„ iitet:.,-- „ ... . ,,, X „., !,; 'At. ..11- ' sO x a S 4n � t ` 0 um y a _-y�.i'�, ' �s J ":- _. I a �` E- 4 �, t ,--:,A, q � i•# .i„ 4 r'.x£f 1+ ',F- i O W ' P a a �; a �;t Y I "�01=004 ,-...r ''',3,..v E. vi O { �'Y � gyp, �1 °' i y•0.y .. "` M f ,/�\ , 1 t '4'.'&:.,,,,,z.41.-,,; z�; � ‘,11,!%401,.., 5 _ +- a - 1 t r c:-17, y 'i,'„'''';'-c;.. { f Fr rs x r Qo a ( 1 pp tr a a. a. ' — ' cin 1..: „ ii i , ! P" ti ' ..1. ''`�u-a�F � ti� mow. ��� ',3;:i44.7:.1.1, -I jtlt� i 1 -1.- s ( a v Y7tEEE P F .1- X CO _ ,• ;lc?'fi.7,r,gatE .. J -,1 ,. '''''. 4, 1‘1"" i il, 9 - 7k. • '4 3 � � l` ' 1 `.Thi -- .Q. ...',,'''''.'1,-.' 4,---q4-0: tt7.4 c8 141kr7 o 1.. 0 1.161 ' ' t'it ,,, ,--.::'' - "„t a, ' t\-‘t, t , 't I ' r 0 la" --.•7=3',;f f �{ - _ - - (43 , . ; • +Y , 1 o z • • V `� " > 0 U1` N9 a� co •r, � -co •% of s N t 4.+ p * `° t.°-,01 u .,o l'-'414-q-10-1 ,--t,!,::,---,)- ‘. 4; c ' r.gy ,.3 . p UI .L ilai �, °' a, . o -. —m ,',..i.1,:,..:Ei..: 1,,,:,,. 1 s o 0 L U v E • t�A C LL :".0 1 r co Q .� � �- O a) — — ��.+ — CU C co i t p E co 0 > cU co }+ a) L . ; V - 2 co O t •� ,_�� ro CD 41'— L � 1`,, , : = „ co 'w C •+ N 0 of 1 co bn r ,.-_, - '. . .g.--,--.,,,J,,, a a YI 4r CD co co .,„.......1. :., -‘ . c a li! ii; , ..: ,. . 0 173. p = i Vf . ` O a •- ,g, E .. kri-)....-.-"I.:•- -i. $ L L t/Y ..4") W O W °n.�ix �r w' • . • • 4 0 •• ' i C iqr 1. m L 'Cij 0 t 7i. J Q� J J p ;,co • J Q V co J a-+. a � � a = te a•0 L7 .0 L 0 C GYM, : r C?�.' g:O �` ..._ ; v 0 O. k O c•in cn W L 2 a z r a + + o cW i low t r a :vi 0 ai 13 fm r s- •� L 41-+s.S j_ 0 - .t $ _ N s_ _ o O •O E O V i O t cu >.4 . .. . , , . „ - ,. ', z E ;V O \_/11) -0 w= ` l s. E to.0 GJ p ec fa w 0 s. O _ •^ -.,`.ii + L. V C �, cu 4-1 M �.+ *'� a +.� C �; �: �,,, E 0 O 4J 0 0 f� 0 C } • r ea v CO C in RI CU .11 p 1:3 CD > Q > G) X � ' O co �n O 'a co O en -13 y4 2 C 2 C . V V .• vei, .4,4„,a,,,,,,,e-vo.„-,', .YJ V > V r f✓ k �T F L t4 r V s- � d1�, b „` O J V Q O O/ J Q -0 Q O ,� L .�O 0 7 O a 7 0 c E Dt . .. .,.. ■ P• , .., %, 40 411-0• Fr•0 I . , . , iip•4, 1 Z„... 1 i . It ..X.'' „: 14r4- .0 ' _ . .1 • L-1---,, i • Air,-.,„,i...) ,ti ._ .. , ,, , . 1 '----,----i • 1 , ...--...r2L- 1---;.'. A', - ''''-",-,--,t- --. -. c„.) , c-7,-D c(.7--,), • i i 10111. __I I. ._.../u • : , *•ti E , • -I - i - ..:.:.,,,„., . i t,,,, O 5 '•L.,-- '• 1 0 cy 4 '1 ,.. ,,t., ,...E-j- ,, z z ... .1 } ,,4 • -' r .,,g,f'.- . ,_ ,_ ,! ' co) 0 ..1 • L • . . ,- •,.....0.,..- cr--„:„:„._,, 1 -.: i „. _ _.,. .. . , ..). • . ..., i., ,,,i t„."" 1 , .,. '' ,-,IM.:-E-',','-falimi' '',..,,:,'• . ,:tt- ' „ ,• ,..,) N(tr''2 \--',_.. .1 , r ---.. r'' / i. .i.11.1.11'';',,t.'''''''''"f'.,'7,','•' ri:0 tii !-:,..i..,' , . :41-. - i la ..-.-%•',.**1••.r.,•.,, • NZip,-- --. 7"00iW1.-1 t .. . `-• "i / 81) .„..,.•::::,:,4.;=-r..7,.._,,,,,....,. .' 40.4*"....v.-741' ■,,f#L ',/,.;",;,1,"7,,"„t!,•,4.:•!g,,/;°.4"., °'.'4".1'f','';'--,,,, '• t?f:''''';*';. '4'.: *-...,"47r;'A,r,‘ 747 _, ..,1 . - , ..,, . • . '°.°:i:::°;'",;••.' 0 . ..,g, -.L.•".. 4 10:011:"?tle i:,,.,.- '.1 ,,„ ,',;.■:':. , ' . r- '• 1 I.' , '• . . . , 0 ' •A `.,, ', =111:.,...:,:"...-"4.4.1"MI MI • • -t , LL - $.--- , . •I, ' ' -- ' .../ • . - . -.1 i 0 m , ,r, ., ',--. • - '-- •.,.4,..' :40 " , -4.Q t ' .'.01:0 ...4 .•,' A:.----- I, . . \ i —77-4 , - . , ..-o co ,, 4,f2-:.,..,• . -,-.#,,,,), . ...:,,,.,,. -71) , 4,1• ___ ......„,_ ‘.... . , _, ,--0----. • .e.2yoiti. ...:-.'7 '° ' .4S ' 1 i J.,/ 1 . / . . 1 14 ? CI s . .tr.: i . ... . , 6 . Ce -*WI ke_i_.. , . \ '',.\ •N.-) * — ,...i.2 c.... tr4 . IZI i U.1 c.)L .11 i. - . Le.li....,, , .11 ' ld- ' , , - • :.-y-irtt-,,i, t. ,, , 0 ' ; ' .' • i ,... ,....,*:.': IA .: `. • '• .„,-.. !' --.. t4 , • , ,......, .. 0 Ci ' 1: ' •i a II 0 - . . , 4mi 1 14 C ' CD CD • 0 E . '.a..) 4-1 •,MM C LA 1 41 0. _ . b . , , , cu >,. 13 C 0 . (II,.• 1 CU a) CU c E . -, ft3 x a) ri • ' - , ' t,,.., to ,..3 --- '-. CD t.) • I La) V bO a) o 1 ,,, • ,i,.. c •_. > 73 .gfiw C:1 0 ...1.Q• 1 ' ' 1 , ,•2', 1,‘. CO ...0 Ct. C 4-, CU CD +a S■ +.0 . 2 >,,, 0. ,... 4- cri 1.-- c , c lc -0 b.13 0. 44.• 0 CI) u . .-----c,,.-, : ------z-'4 s- C RI E 3 0 0 0 a) 3 C 1: 0 cu v) I -o to 4.. 0 •_. 0 I- 0 a) 0 C ... ' , ' 4t- ' . i.i •..., 4 it Ce firma MI c 2 cc )..• c RI CID ...„ cr) 0 . • el3 0 c .?•_. c..)E . 121 ai ••• ' • J CU •— in 4-0 N 0. CU 4-0 C 0. M •— 0 CO N CD 0 , t. E _ . >pi,. .W •NM 11) . 4 . - - =.. 4 I:3 •— CU ■•III •■ =MO W . I . .1■• > CU CO .0 > : u,--= II I" C13 fa ' — —I 0 0 < < LI. 0. CI . 114, • • • • • • • • - / . ' fir, + '1 ff t�� pO r ', r.t �} ., l.`J � �, Ste'.• ` Y j p 'R. F"!'lkri 0,. 1 ' III-- t t.: 57 li ,4. _ tr a 4 .. y u �, rj .W 't:. t.` r � N N O•z �O,� �. ,tF k� j���1 a t 4f 9 ,Fl .; , - � fig 3rl R .al. 1Ar�-.'-. w, k Cr. �� �,l� ry ;;/ f} • I r ti Y { 4 ] SRtiY.�Yn' AN •,, t� 1 / —( aN7'F'' r v - 1! 3 • ; i�J .A• l j$w. V/ / $ r r 4 } i iy• /�/�� I ! i 4 't – �Y 3 '- f r 2 • 4-.9 3 C , w - E U CO CU E I CD a E O 1 •— — O. U i C O .�.+ O CU G1 E OT C + • E O ._ In NMI t I. � 0 C co'O m C> O CU H CL) O 4... ++ 0 C (lb CJ 0 V fa s- bJ3 CU �' 0 4A GJ �E1 fi 1 •__,..,■4 eti O VI fCI CI i _c3 -. \ CU 4.4 • h hA N N b4 vs O 1,,z,-_, v ..., CU CU t eeeer• L N 0, gt g ,, _. GJ CU L.. -c:3 -cs CC U • 1-.., :„ 06 f0 C C CU 4-0 O N C VI V VI co fCi b.0 +a ti \A�/ O W QO �'+'?" '"`' �. rt to t� •e. Le) •_ H co •• ° y: triRx 1 0 ca C C z �: C/�D C Q .i = •C �qq�' 1 P r. • oa 4■1 VI . VI CL t.)._ C . .,( 0. ,, ii -If i P i . L. , fit-=) -��- �;' Y+w., s 1.1.7.4..)°,'r. (i - 0 { `=.. V �c i 4'.. i (A= }� _ t d { �} 't a CFA 1 ( 2•2 t i 1 Diu 3 *-- ti voi• Rw J 1,-..4...',,,...-,‹-„,:-.., T 4. :m t, tx#„ t hy. ,. '�. •— 1 ""'"qI�_ 0 x„ ;c+r['' ., , s i■ .r.„..„,,,_:.,„,•::,,,,,,,: y en ;,-::: ui 6i., \ . ..___,........., -._____,,,, ....-...--- •. , oo .cce, ';:i '. ... . Q i O V U.J. Z Y 0 N in co CC .0 O • t/1 01 •C �1 > I ti 0 = o �G 'O s.. � fa fa to CL VI C V). 0 v W N C Y u'f • R0 LA in- t�if i C 0 � Q -I N L .- 4 '� Z3• • 44... C G1 t C CD C C f N fa 0 • Cr > H fa C o , � 440 a., m ' u :� Q �. 0) a CO 0 ko f3 8 VI VI L L > Q , i . .0 LL 0 0 0) ci U C 1=I O ""Z (-46.) CO), , 1-.7-1,-1, '''.3 OJ •— ca.— ° ; fa CL 4•J i a i.- •ca- N N C —s.. f a .— L- .. _ O 0 Q ( H Q 0 A � C C J r 0 \ o\° C �R c 00 E O. •N i t C RI <* LA N a W d '''s-5_..4%,...." . ) ::.i.7.X.i - `. . • • • • • • • • 1 ( a *'4' Xo * ♦ s 4:1*.:7-1*4* 3 m. .... i G N OW F a vm 0 W cu N Q . ( co CL u.a � sil a., z .: 2 •■ KW WWi1 M9 CO .e.i - 1 a.,, •._..._ pal InR.k.. ,,. trl. 1 . ...... 1 ,,...c:, I i. r ` —I.,: _ ,,._____ 1 i, ,, , H.I iii::f m 1 TT 11 'tNlli/Is 1 swan �■o .r 4 /V V1• I .,"I ti! 'tr • 4 t , ...;-F-1. 1 1T7 i___ '."."17 r "f, p; )lrN kW j { gr t t,-. -r \T �� _ I 1 ,1' ! " N -- ■ - 0-----01- - P•••• ...„ ji 1 ,4 T" ,4.MOM /....ft...1 mow'' L 1~ a■ rf 0 i!. .n_ s1 � i.Lilt,. rrn 4. z - '''— f -�'-_.■� c t si IEl - _ 1 ,i Q . ‘,.--, 'hi 4- r lir _I r -1- 16, ' '' II itit...:_,. i j a 'Er a1 :_- L, , ,. is € ' bill y, , -.~ r,rv+ ,v _4 c..) J9 : PY .Y/ ra • ✓ Y i Q :< k,, 1' S6S € i a t t I. A i ...., \4111‘..-141 t L J 2 d ”c_2 -1 z 8 W .0 tCri2 $ i S O r' 7r2 n ME ,� •�.�•� Cuj`u, a ir? T x t 4 -f, Cal ' ri 4t i t J: N r, 1 Nri C N 0 16A 5 Q* Z ^c ¢ V 1' 1 W n \ 1. r gl , _ ., a E . 1 ii , L 1 . •2 - .1 .� OTC OC , i \ p.i N . / R Z ,t.:1- J -"rC V S C J ` ; L J V F c. GZ % t _ 7.. 2 F K- v^ J J .Y4 t 2 7 I L J Q J C b.0 E 'Zs 1111 ••_CU O co w 0 O m ,_ Q vV u. n N tiii C O C C bb.O C O O '� '�r_x ` X GJ >' .� — J 0' i ._ ca �-+ C C in 2 v) a � •— p � O co aj O C co , O t +.a C L ' -0 U. — ♦,,, a. L O t CD aro a CU N IA 4 CO •4 u --I to Cam c � +, a � oc N � V � CD C E _ 4- 4 m •— li( V u 4-' cu c'C + C 3 .� C p L i C C 'a ,bu0 O .tOC-1 , 13 O c0 to 0 E 0 'n L in 4- V V m O V p cu cn ` it. i oei r • • • • - r / , ittil 2 z , CO ' III C::I 33111=1.1 W im...1, • 1 0i_ 1 NY,' .,, 8 4 z 373 ce yit :: i1 '...4.---,..4,,, • " ..,,‘-A. ' ■■-".•: ,-'7: :::,.:""'", 4111,. _ ,_ ,.. ... 4 :1 I , A . , ,--..,-- - 0 C - , 1 P-t:1 ri----) Z ,...;4 I ,,......) .._,-). '', in 23 __.:" "4 \ , 1 . _ _ 1 0 k,,,, . , \ ' cl■! ' Nimi ' I I • . 1 F I ' r= 1 C =1 Cd i lb 1 • CI L. 1 F ! 0 CO t 0 = • 1 >1 D0 >> rrfuL—'-9 D 33==21 4=2) rj Cz) i 4 ; 0 C3 3 1 1 g Kg ,,. 1 c u) L...., . , , • 1Fs- C) ,,, ''' n .'• C C C.) (o) > 0 a .:==. • i „,,,_ .4,1.,... _ ...v....11.......,i.., ..., 0 (-_-_-_D n ...,........4„,:-... c„,. . .,,, , ...:, ., .,....,,,.... ...,‘ .....: ,. .,_._ ... :. . . 5.:. it. .... .‘ , , .,.. 7-7-1 o Q v • W .._,W , . . F-- cL. i,,. . ........._. ....... ., : a v. �/ ii, ,,.._ ,,.,...._, .... _ . . . A ....> QC 4.0 Z ■ 4.4* o \ ','*4. ,re Z-7,7 . , -..., - 1i_ . S.. ,.,,o;„44.,,,:•,0.,•..',w,m,,, , 4.. LLI ° 111'er"""■■■ mo' ii,... - -r"-- \- '- -'''''. ■11 Z *Al." 2, ' • '," _ .4081.g._:.:;,...\, .,. .;-.. 1,, . , , , s CC w■ o . �� F za- ' s F.— a) momme �_ �,N ,ZS a '� k 1' ..r �' ' O \\\:C 4 r kC11".1. te' 4,° ,', ' *— :' I‘.. ''"• .' t . . , littto. ..4041,,..1,\i:61,,,;, ,, :, , a. rj U '111" ' a . i,'' ' O • ` f ry ..-.1,r. xA�..r. -. :• .-'. 2.tee*, i 1r :* ,:' . 00Q i al LL V M.1( U ' a) i a) ZU .J O O.., Q V C r . < • .• � th ,,,..,,,t,„ a 41; ' ile t 4i x a k 0 ,.-, e-----4.- - , - -- W. 1 ' ' - ' . '.. -- 0.-\1;0:-). "" .1 '. r } • l �� 4 g r �, E l _ _. }( . �• 1 _:� , rigs d F t� � i(Jrr1 l) � E . - ..,' C.--- :377'7' .. .--1 (.6--- f Cir) . ..: ,. . f. '''' 1(7''''4',- ,I 777--2 4.24el.17:e' I Z ,( i . o a' z^L4' z:. 3,Z k is ;Nva 1'2 i/Ak i: . • . =mi. .. . .'.. V1 .' Cln . f' . A '''' .... ,... 2 %o=4.1.••'), ' ''''''' • ,•-• .: '?„..;.' . - 0 -, •:.• , 4 .. . ni ;',■:Y.';`,P'7%;:f`:24,,.„''''441'..,., .,i '''';.,,,`1&4'.,?i' -- ,..,,..--,'.:. 4:--•-:,,,17, -,;.. .,,, ,. ,1,-,,, •t..,,,j, 1 , . .......____,...., , . , . „. - --, — r—r• , -•,1,:•,----f. -- • , '. - - . -..i — - •• - - ,pttlerst......--,-,..- , "J t.1", "4.t.' ,. 'IT7-71 "I ' ; ; i '-'1 - , -, ' - '-/ .4.4-.,. 1,, ' --S, , ' ""'' ''!-''1 .4 'IN k,, ,„,:s . , 1 --*--. - •- • -- •'. - . , 1 W ' •4' • , `' ./ , -71.4.4•Y''.: ;, i '.. -,J 7.•••_It. t....•...-:,....,„4.e,.,.!..!,---,-,4.- i - %• ", ' .. '`.."I 4 Gi,....... 4 4., ,,,,,,,f1,,k .„., I ti ,,_ ----- -,,.. , . 1 0 ,---,i \ - , , , —4-, . . . 1 lb- , .,) . , ; ',",,//t-;:i2.4-,*4T-. ../i '."."--4'44741, - ‘"17° .:t.o:'4-.1•' ,"•`'.% \ . 4 •• . .4 C - .- - ' ' ' ' ,.- \ .. \ \--..t1-' i. " ‘. • ` . 4 ., Cir) 1 ' " I . •••'•,, ..*,e'•17.-5-;/1/4,---14-.4./- ''' - ;., . ,; ; - ,- 5 , . ‘,. ■ (1.) ;. i „,.-4 /..1.- i ., ,,,,,,o,c - , ',, x.----; ,/ . • -i W „ , , , • .":„....,,,i.....--:. ,17144::::;71.2.,illlc,,..ilf,71,4:\\,,,,c: .....\ ,:i,',1 \ I. : ,,: ,li , N., ,...,.• i N4 kt , -- ' i— -- •------",-?. --,- •', - i , 4 v.,, \ . - * • i . ... , ' -' ' ' 1 , ..,,e,r, { i■ • t,. . i .., ,.. ,74.. .1,'.4 i,.t".rt,„,`,,ikitr 1' ,',,,,''',... i ' . ' ‘ 1 t ' i','',i' 4 , .A::'''..Pt...41.44,, ,,•',, - . I 1 - 1,'-'141* ''.- I te -- - ,4-11.7iNgi 1.,:. •-- • . - ■ - H H-.!' • ..,, } 4 I ... ,,, .... .. • I ' 1 . .., tSti. . 1 /r`f ', 7e1 'I 1 fft .-_....1..___, 1 --4-72 ` etl r4 I '`. rs. „, ,,, , .,.,, ..J, , i - ! C...--7--l--) ,4''... ,i.. (-TM-) r'''7..---I rl .,.. ' ' , .------Th, ‘1, - i:t, ,i , ., , . I-9 : i rri '_,...,--vr-r---"- . I I' l! pl'.- ' - 1 1 IV ' . ,: ' ',.• 1*** ', z ' 4. I-..,-. - .....A = •. ',,"-* :r ", , f - 1 IH\k, n(;) ' i•-, " i- . ' , . •; ..4 , . - ., i . • 17.-7 .7,- 1 ! „ . .i., - , , , 3 / t i 4,, _ ' I . . , Z I- I t, ‘. '1,'` 1 1 . , . , - ', t. 4. ,.1■6. "---irt f1,..., .,, , .._ .- . . .,,. . .. . .. . .,, , . -,r7'-3A—H „.,, ,, ..,,,....4 liN If C) -==- - ___.)r.k• . ,..--,-,, 1,. ' it I,'4 . t w, '\ ,, , 4,. ', -Iv \' Vall-1 A t 1 , fia . —......_ .=0!•°,0. ••- ...LL.,,,e.` 1 ....4 . . , 4' . „..... , fr. : :=.1„.„, i. , ...,,,,,,• -444,43 \i' ' .1,, , 1 r.,.. 1 :4' •I. - 1 .,„.-,,,,,,,..„....,..„..•,, , ,. , -i . Als,_'‘1;----..-,1 ' '. - ' ' ' 4'' r4.-,',--ri;,..1•011.m!,qt :. '4,-,,?,--i 2- ..;v:s.,'-i'-- ' ' - -1.” I':11,14; it" A :74-4;4 i ,f i „Jr.„17.1f ie- -•1 ■ 11_1..11 ." ' i .. ,,, ,,,,. -4.*''''''':,k.' "'I. tt ' S•31'.3°' .4I i'' . ., . nf-4054,:t :It: Ez -1,-,ii - ' g'.•,„ ...,....„,,,,...-:,z. 1,,. msa, , • .4,.. T rs- z Ei R rim M . ,T, 4t/&.. ,i,' z z . -t 0 u,- 1M11111121E . , 1 c:P:1 • **‘%,/ , i x 0 0 0 7 • -N. -Ir,,, * ... • r.• W "°1 ,. • - 00 CD 3 .r..., . ..• . ... , ., , .,. , .,....• ..,. CI) • 0 ,.. . . .. __) '-`:S. ,..):1„_, ; '..i, Y,- - -•. :• ;'. ..,::^ ', ',:t. i.01 -- • L.L, 1 I 1 i'i; cml zIlil-:b b.•J z.n.';.,,o',,-a...:-,--,.. ,k-'''. \,i t k1 v.t4.:,_•.;.k,,,:'.,-. 0 C0D.=D U>= c f ' ■ \ ?-... .,.--:•;•-t '—c-4'4 2-_.:,,•5 ------' .-.,) r=1) : WdD •'. ''"..,, . , „., , , tih, _ -, i', -' • \',.., , , . . ! •.. t.*,,,,,,, _ .,- '',,,,, '•■.: \ 3 .. , ,.• . ! Q..,.'. .„ .. -‘,.,.0.,,... ,.. • . •,,,..„...,,,, • \ -• . ..,, . , . . ..., , . . , . . , .. .. '. .-...1 .-.• .... ._ <7' • -- . ,. . ., o .:• ,,, I . . , -— 1 -- •-- • , , .. • ,,, , ,. (cif , .5,....,..1c>__,.). ..... , ., .1 .. 1.,..d. ..:• .- • I . , ..,,,,, . , • . . . i -) ,--,„ .1 :....,_ • '--- -7-;--). .1 •,, . I L. ,,----•:_..'"-s, ' ' .,,,41 - t• . •t- " (-'1 ,)'‘‘ -t • " '-' , ,,,.,4„ s .,, j • - ' ',) ' , ,•- ! tir 't 4*-\' • 1- , I . - • i . .'' r, • 1 . . ,....c.% .i. / .c' 1 • n . U , 1 -g N . •• -t A , .---.:.,.....,„, -4I'Agg.-• -,4,--,,---,- .„..• • t 7 - ._, ...__,J(--7 P ..,. •-. , - ,. ' • - 1 : ,,,..,„ .,.,:w...47'4'''-7''• ' . - ;.;., / 4,•.;',-, ..7'.-d,,,d5'. .f4. - .1 4:3,1 . ■ , ..00. 11 ,- ;kis::k• . d,', 3:': lijim .. , Iti fl... \V"3 . - i• xi r■ 1' z 37. 3'4 ,. ,,,3 '11113 . ■I' : z z I- 111.11111111ff : M . . : . •ns- 0* "1: '-• • r-6 4046,4r* , 0 z 1'414040 „i• • 1:::ii,' oz o 1 •-* --' ,> - - - •• lJI ::,,..,,,„., „ ..8 . 44' • ,- It , ,,, 1 ':;1:',4';''''';;;Iis.:`,.,:"..;,,,,;(:::,-:›C)::„.t,„,-:2'4::::,;,■:'''.:4'iii''''''''C'::::,:::'''-';•:— , ..`' / , . , . • . . ,. 4,1 ' 17 1 ! '. r,7 e..;- ■ ,.• ,.-1-;„...,...,,,.,,,,,. -,,,,,.--,:',;!,.,,,,,, .. ,i,.-,:....5'af'...,-,1,4 '...; :": 2,1 , ,,. -"A ''/1 , -.: C1).., 1•'- '-. (7.1 sOk, : ------- - :•_-- —.. . ....,,,, , i ts. ......,. ,'-, 1 i k r.„ tll _ 1 ,.. , d t i 1„, 1) . - , 0,:. -1,T1 (D 1 Z' . Pie - . s..,IT I - ' ' Ne ., i i Cb ' s, „.1.... ... i ' 1 3 .., 1 4 , ,.„ ,., I 1 .• I i,-- 1, li - .f."•• . 1 1 T.-• , • • . . 1 • . A• $ • 4- ,1 I ',—.. -,—:c‘f`„,i r-1/41•---'.4,..)—.1_f'n„,4-„.,-,--1-,1'-,,,/1,,v 1 i ,,',,,,,. F i. \ Ii ,-' 1 1, -- I \ 1 I- , ' 0 , . Ai. i 1 i 1 2,' 1 ‘ •,44. •4\ . • t •t ,. 0 c'' 0}1' 0 ,? 11 - ',.• . , '.i., . ,,, ----' - • ^ ,,,....'•• ••,,)', 'I. , ,. „2,74,tr.c .':.a.i.+4;',".,,t . . • Tin r. ,...,,4, :1,4 F., 4 , il .----''''.--r ; 44i.4 ,e,,,...(' , li 4'. J.:,•,..1,,,,,,-=-4',1::',.t,,-',',..-' ' . , ::: 1 — ' ,;,,,..} , i.-,,-.,-...,,,, .-',,',-•. ,,,, ,,. o> ., ,13, ‘ 0. ,. , . ' Irro..14:,, z n z; It,.--,,,”, ..., .. z. r- m ,'---7 '' .. -. •- v r.... f„; i E , • wlei I H J' 3 Q., >neti 411060,40 I/ 1 .9 x .14..itivo - I ) .., • ,r ...,-gill .., ..-; •..; . 7•1::.,,AH. • ••... _ •:- ,..... ' •ir .. a) • • . . ... . . n: f—gp •,,:d CD ,..„---..-. :=1::::•4; ' '.---•.:_ r,..,,, -''' ;,• . •-:-..;4,-;•.,,,,:-:,,,,,..iti,...„.;.1.;.,,t-;,,,v ..;,•,-;.-;:-.;,;,•;-;;,;-•,!-;-.„0„;.iv -4*z ., ,.,_,,,,,,,,,,-,- ,,,,- :.,:--'. •;,,, ----•. .,• .- e, ..:.,,,,,....,-:::-.--• . _. • -,-., •••••• --,.-'•. .- ..4t,,- • 0 - •..:, ... • •,.• .9- 4,--- L----4._ • • •, / -..,. \ , - a (-01 '...--, '------,-, _J; ■ ' " ' . ).111'' .. I). CD ••,. , -• (b.-- --?Ji ,.-- . < i: -.D - 1 ' - ,- I .4 , ,) it 0 . . Tr ' ID 'N.. ,1-". . • A .44. .....?,::,iik, - :E:n).. ,,,_6_,,■ : _,......," . . 4N) , , ....- CD . . . . • i . , • . ;: Zz • , -._ , q9\ • . . . 1 bzi: 4: 701 , ' • '. 1' Aff r ,• .. , )57\\ ... rag z`\ . \,. I .,' 1 . f\ A 4. \ • • 1 \ • -- 1 ' ") , ...1 •1 • •.. ,) ...., i i r-■ r, \ '\ IC,- \,..2 • „ 4 ,. \ .( • 0, \• .,/ ,,,,„1/4\. t A. ' (rdri-,,, , , . -; '• \:\c\,,, tti:j: -.? \ .'.,\,‘ . . • .._ --v 1.1 . " ' \ % ` i' "t. 1\1 • .:.-_-__ , • c -,,,- .(1 --- ---- - ... • ' -1-i' - . .1k. [ .i. . , k'l . . • '\ .. ',-, rfr) . , 1.. . • -c-,t, k. „. .. Z' ' ‘ - . `...-/ ( ,., ass, l' I a tr' \ ‘ ,t,0 ' L .,,pj . ..,. , ' \ 4, A '''' 'S‘t '''.. .. :il' V ‘ 4 , ,• I ' .i '• ''''',':i-Li'l-,-*.::,` -',1 , L• "A',,..;44'Y 't.' '-,•;;.•':'''"';,.• ' '‘ - ° 9§14 e . .- . . . ., .......11-7,..,-,:i•;:l'.,,,,,i,,,,-,;" Z. i,--?•„•,-...,..,-,44.,,,,,,,,,N*...• , ‘ • "I.7-'.1::7',7r1111if.: ,,..,.,:,,::44,`'L-',";'••4.,'.:4' i''la V!•-• .. .. • I. jA, ,, '7 '•.r. A.... 1-I J 3 r— m , .,_ Imommar ; M ■ ' n -r---n.- - CIF no'," 0. •1.-' ' 0).)> * ........,I . , . : - like 0 0 o ,...... . , 0 ,,,,.,.. .,......t) r-) 0 r....4° W ,„, 5,- ;,;.!?it', ;;3-s e',1 .,,,,,r,.•:„0: CD ..; = 0 k-, -.: 1 1;1"-.'s.,,,4 ,. :,,,,. ...-xx.t.,0.-...4,,u-r4:4-Iii1111• - = - X' cD 0 -1, ail , , (.1 ' ) a. ..? ---\ ,1 \. , ,,1 ,--1. '1) 1 „ pi ...... c Iv L' s, < a) 4 /..... . • -)4 I ....,--. - 4 3 Cn 1 _ \ _): . = \ ,.?.., .-..,-....., ...3) . Ca "".....„.„..c...,, IU i's 4 , ---- ' , , •- e:,.; ,,. ■ , N 4- 4, 0 ;' 6.,-- CD , . i 444 4 3 \k 5;■-.'4,,,...."' . WV' .1. II I' 11 ; 0 , ! Cb, ,,,-- z......7. ,......--. \ , . „_•1 • , . . , • Uelt \ • (1) . N .. 1 „..,1,. I .-----/' - x:. • - i ,t,.' •i-t• \ / 1 „ •-...‘r 1 .„,,..„ 1 ',i`, 4..; it : i - -•- . ., ,..s . ,. !?,,,.,- • . ._•.;',), . bri - , `A.,g (11) : • -p •.1 I 1' ,•,4 ( -, ,. I ■ 0:•,0 I 1 4 ‘, k^ -,-,t.,- I I -•''‘.,,' — ■ ,-3 , ' ,, '''' , _,.....1„.. .H1 /— jil: ,2s,,tlyti.--,-„IV:1 7-—' ‘....',' ii,_).I-1}' . _J.; • / 4 1-7 ,,,,.,,,-. ,•.1- -• , $ .1 1,11 .. (i) L-1 . 4--- . — ____ ,_ _ .. 4. ___,-, -1, Dr-------3 2.72 (--1 , ..,A= F,. ,. •.• ' 41,e ?:.,1 , . .,,,,. .22.,,-.f......_ ii=4' PrZ44 \..r ., . 1_ .3.,,,,,,,,,p ".t,,,. .,-.44:,,-1 ft 1ft.k.,-` . • . ,••=:' - ) 1 I 34 .'7'. ,•J , ,. - V \/1L -fi i A ' '01 ....,,) ' i;:!, ..-4' ''6,—A,i i 7_7 ,,r. r"..: . ' I , _i.,-,fv1,,M1 j''''- .. „ ..,.,, ,--• ,t,,,,,r-,:‘,-.,,„--,- , 1 ' ti) i,' 4,..--,..,- , '-A) f=e,,,,,5 Y.,,.....;:, lei,„<r,,' ,10..0 .,.1 SNIMMNIMINSWO X'd-`4 sfyg),k1--- ,-1 , I 01' l'i. 1 , , .- ( a 0 C"*. k' ;;;;..-.1 -_"7°,,,,,,4*,..., ' ' 41,' • =`,.':'.:141,M g 14 tit— • ,-,..f..,' , k...9.i V, ilit•_.g.,- : N t .., .....,,,, 1 . . . s ..,-',"'"';;;;"Ver:ri.'''.”•'- 4s: ,i,•igi,-;,--- -). ,•_ „4,...,...... 1 , - rivi.::::.'• Z.,,,, 4: ';',...,,,,•','.... .' ;`,'.';'•:. c,,s ,,IIID " , . •.., ,; : <it, s.o z r, *---------- f . . M. ,P. r--z. . ..., m ...... , . ., „.....,, %,...,, , 0 .....fr licr-, ] ' 4144:11/111110; 1111 sZeN 3 5 �. u =▪ -• r- n z o " 4 n A ll.)! '40 ',/.1' T tr//1.�� ...a T i a . 0 1e0 A pfd 9 O F C.P) i so pooawaj — :nti asowtak My worn aN 3 r t» an�nuvgep� ange Se „w rn�, aay v.,( a bzi ptetkst ,ri, A� ,. 1, anL+saN1a� A I , any wnvH 3 C k_trsi\ r■-+ , CD y ~` N Q ;r,� , ', �_ jj ! Th7?tj7cj a ►� r . ..__ ---- •- r r n• •� -4- I O O O 7.:--- • • 1 alimmt- kl , :, 1) O'CD 0 O-O O O O O O-- %�i Q di TI z — ‘- 0 o 0 0 q► el 31. o� V_ �fl z No �✓ s Haven Ave. r n m �x) .F.-- m• ,o0 SO •."�• c ) 0 a . a• -TO • . - - : . .. woo 40 IIP 4oppk.% i...........4, IT , 0 11* 2." , I - '• p — • k 5=,' ei w i ', ) „_.. „1 ,---). %. ., ...., > C ;a■ - Z ;? -a. spfuceav,. 1 , 1 ! — r C ..., . T r!, a■y a-s■ .' 1 . • i . . . ) -"' • • v :•J•:- > n ••..•.s ,.\ ,. ' 71 -Pli 'ImTell Z '3 0 ioNIN l' '4 - . — . .., !it: • , 14 ' iitt cej .!;:. '' '''''''.:'''-'; il . 0 ,... -4, ' lit P . lb i -9 9 Hql •••7374:,::.... , It• r 7.3 ..... (:) ,:. 0 1 tt 010 ,2 8 i 6%,1 44k"tr,rt View 0,S . ft). C . i'■%4 M CD v--1- k< Milliken ve , CD . _.e.,,, . >--- \ - — , •...,..,:,,,,„,...:, t / ,. — 1 1.i I 14 A \ '--- • 7= — I - ' 1 ' +- _ • ___ --- --- , (*) t — si_ = = • .....l CA) \ 1 t kl I'l --- __ — ""% • = : 1... 4 •- ---- —— — . . ---,........ cf) = L OJ I •\ I. -_-71 I/j..,., rdp..... . 1 • •,.,,,:sir4.:. ,0„it Z < , :.d ENNI 73 ‘1"11 P-7 1 ---- -01';'"" TI --_-7. --------:-:- --- Z . . ,•• • r ,__.____ ,\ 0 M I . z .. v ' 0 tn --411---AP_.... 7!'• L lj <W. PI 0 2 n \.. .„.....„I'l_1, w-. , 1‘...... .....„.....„..- - 1i , r 1- III c.) nivt, (DU ::spz • • . •01). >.7, I 2 40 • 4,15 •••*** ,•, z0 oz L........ • ., ,> ' Y .. i pit$, ti A3 c f• ¢C7 . .. .� - . ' n a` ' p r+fit r s 1 •. 7)- � ,- :A . r;Ott-JAI� -1 , �� __ UJ .ez.3 K._ f �j i 1 f f 1 O O . , . ,..-IT'- - ' .4*- • • 1 Av\8 E s;k i .-� �� c �) n �" s '�1' ` i she 5$1. . ,.. 7 xO 4 t• i r„ 5 r j:j .!, n om. : ;f rt", 1.4 „..... . , ... . . . ....,,,,.•. .,••;:„.••„. .•„• 1. I. ,i •_ . ':+: !}. 1�„ ni. ,. b.0 \ • I ark v#� n r� 1 1^ ' i N \ . -PItt— , t� CU Y` Q) > U ~ I a'1. cn O a 'I� r_ r t \ � \J 1 t)A V O `+— DC -o .."y` O — � V) ;I::1_(:) "y>I 0 O C = ` ZS , � N p ;4 1' CO . . 4--1 (-I-. E o .-§ . O a) tto ir4---.),.- — .5'- ' ‘ ,..,—.) 0 V) CO U I . t 0 cu It -41 ' .. .-,.t..,,,, '. –0 = > 0 v) f rt p a) CO CO O ca p tlA ; } 413 v)C> a) 0_ s_ a) s ;.I . V a) ��,� ' ` '� Q Z V co V O Z I� • .,, • • • • • • • • • • • • 1' ,, — I / %)I.Criiro. z 0 ,. /•044**....s'6 _....1 614 ---, (1) C >% 13 5...MIEN11.1115 4 MO C C I INF/ tf)M 1-:* wimmll •MIMI <Z k,C.2„)'*, (1) 4-1 •- (11) 0 LEI) (1) MO . .,3+1.4‘c...'7,..t`4 4,,,t.,`11 0, ■11' a) E 1... •......,„ a) 4401;r•, 4,1t a) •..... " •••••• .0 > ' ,..p > —0 _C V) CD a.) ii = •a j., a) E •_. 0 +4.) 0 , . .._ a) sl.. _ ,.. ,....,_ , •....... " cu C c U •- a.) o , cc ! = •- > 0 ...0 - 0 C n. U C CC S. 4.) 0 .4...1 c2L. ........ -0 > .. . ... , • .•••••II C CU I. cu 1) U 4-) •..... v) co • ocu _c 73 Cl.) 0 C 4 C , (1) 4-1 > L.. co 4-)....i a.) L.... .... L. a) ,...., ,--1, \-g 4- 7:3 a) a a) CU ,,,,,_ , -..c. ,• C (1.) I:3 ...c5 •...... —C •NM= Sil■ 1.: 'lb I f- itel 1 4 i ' tb '-----'-',' all) CO CD■ (111) as E cc co° 2 • s. s.... v) . co 0 • ,....... ,.. ,.. .1 , 0 ti, + J ' i'l '''...'"' 0 -1--) = •MIMES •GM= U rinC Ca MC 4.1.1j C SIEM t) :0/eel k CU ...... 0 CU Sim= SI■ (:) cp ... . ,, , ,.. .. . _:,....,_ ..: .... .. ,..,,, 1-1- E 4_,,,, 11... -c..3 E 1— ,,,_ (13 a) st,„ -1-1 0 C 0 0 CC 1,,, , (1) U 0 t.i. •.. U --,,: .., -'. P269 • STAFF REPORT � I COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT I RANCHO Date: June 19, 2013 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Nettie Nielsen, Community Services Director By: Melissa Morales, Senior Administrative Secretary M'w- Subject: CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL COMMUNITY SERVICES SUB- COMMITTEE'S RECOMMENDATION REGARDING APPOINTMENTS TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY & ARTS FOUNDATION'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDATION To approve the recommendation of the City Council Community Services Sub-Committee to re-appoint Jim Harrington to serve an additional four-year term on the Rancho Cucamonga Community & Arts Foundation's Board of Directors and to appoint Rod LeMond to serve a four-year term on the Board. BACKGROUND Jim Harrington, who currently serves as Chair of the Community & Arts Foundation has expressed his interest in being re-appointed to the Board of Directors. During his tenure on the Board, Jim has played an active role in a variety of areas including leadership, Board recruitment, sponsorships and arts giving. In addition, through Boardmember Rosemarie Brown's efforts Rod LeMond was recruited to join the Board. Mr. LeMond, Assistant General Manager/CFO of Western Municipal Water District of Riverside, has been a long- time resident of the City with valuable fundraising experience. Staff is in support of both appointments and met with the City Council Community Services Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Michael and Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo, on June 5th to discuss the applicants. The Subcommittee concurred with staff and will present their full recommendation for the appointments at the June 19th City Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, h N6uSe ---1 Nettie Nielsen Community Services Director I:ICOMMSERVICouncil&Boardsl CityCouncillStaf fReports120111CommFoundAppt6.15.11.doe