Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982/05/05 - Agenda Packety ^i ACr S d� .2• R7RCH7 CUCAMONGA $` REDEVELUF +i_MT AGENCY AGENDA Lion's Park Commucity Center ,;• 9161 Base Line Poad I' Ra;.cho Cucamonga, California ;i May 5, 19E2 - 7.-OU o m. tx s•r 4 �. at 7.09 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER. a a. Roll Call: Frost x Schlosser x Buquet x , Dahl-j_, and MikeTx . app=end 5-0 for b. Approval of Minutes: April 7 and April 21, 1982. „1 APZ at aastalned on Apttl 7 minutea 2. S1AFF REPORTS. - 'a 4k• A. PROJECT REVIEW PRGCESS. ;a ennrov..d 5 -0 RESOLUTIO8 N: RA82 -3 r A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALI- FORNIA, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF PROJECTS AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS i WITHIN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA. rt rt+- ..tlnn w•+jnr.rnnA „e• 3. ADJOURNMENT. 7,25 p.m. ,Sa f 1 f Ti- l�. "iatl�'tTM is�s�k41 @7'Y$`:,� °.� ;�.. .. ... ,. ,.•:.r!Yrx?„ ~'r a 1 ACTIONS MY OF r RANCM CLrAYOCr% > ^_iT1' COUNCIL. •± o _ a AG:ENM Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Pase Line Road -7 Ranchr, Cucamonga, California I� R, equuiar Meeting - 7:30 P.m. All !tams submitted for the City Coure:ll Agenda cast be in vtlting. The daadiine + r for submitting these lt4'm0 Ss 5:00 p.m. on the Mednesday prior to the meting. The City Clerk's Office recu.ran ail arch !tears. at 7,35 P.O. 1. CALL TO OROERc r - A Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Cali: Frost x Schlosser_, Buquet _w. Dahl x . and Mikels z . S approved 5 -0 for C. Approvcl of Minutes: March 17, April 7, April April 3. Dahl and 20 dr,d Apr, r 21 1 ?132 Buguot alutalned for March 17, corrected April 7, and April 70 ainutes 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. Bridge not present to a Presentation of Proclamations clations recognizing Phillip ,l receive proclammtion D. Schlosser and Arthur H. Bridge b. May 8 -15, 1982 - SPRING CLEAN SUEEP WEEK: ' (1) Presentation of Proclamation (2) Poste Contest !Yards (3) Description of Activities: May 8 - Special ' Trash Deposit [my. c. Monday. May 10, 7:00 p.m. - FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING - Lion's park Community 1:c Center, 9161 Base Line Road. d. Tuesdd!'. May 11, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL CMISS10N ' HEFTING - Lion's Park Coa,rinity Center, 9161 Base Line Road. - N ' e. Thursday, May 27, 7:90 P.A. - ADYISOP,Y'COMMISSI6N• „�. MEETING, - Lion's Park Comunity Center, 9 61 Base4. Line Road. �,� `'�4 -73 f: Tuesday,. June 8, 7:00 p.m. ETIWARDA SPECIFI6kA MEETING.- Etixanda Intermediate School,,.6925' rFtiwa .Avenue. I r City Council Agenda -2- May 5, 1982 approved 5-0 - 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. t• She following Cement Calendar :terra are expected to pp be routine and non- ecntzovoralal. They will be acted i' upon by the Counell at ono time without diacussion. u t i i c a. Approval of Warrants, register no. 82 -5 -5 in the amount of $487,525.09. b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Gloria M. end Jack A. Andurson, Regina Farmer Jack's Restaurant, 12892 Foothill Blvd., for on -sale general eating place. c. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Haueh Pin and Hyun Hoe Wang- China Alley, 8270 Foot1i11 Bivd., for on -sale beer and vine, eating place. d. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Dina L. and Fabian F. Scarpine, Jr , Scarpine's Lunch Stop, 9631 Business Center Drive, Sate G. for off -sale beer and wine. e. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement for Minor Director Revler 82 -08 - Bougher and Brogles, located at 8270 Foothill Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCARONGA, CAkl- FORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 82 -08. f. Change of Street Name from Center Avenue to ivy Lane •n Tract No. 9458. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALI- FORNIA, CHANGING THE NAME OF CENTER AVENUE WITHIN TRACT 9458 TO IVY LANE g. Easement Agreement with City of Ontario.. Re approval of easement agreement with the City - to provide right -of -way on Milliken Avetua.r ' for street constriction in conjunction with qo, - trial Assessment District. Provis'on of,agr �.q only }effective with District formation." !Y 'i I I'v r. 1 x E J 3: 5 City Council Agenda -3- Nay S. 1982 h. License agreements with Santa Fe Railroad. Recommend approval of license with railroad assuming responsi- bility and liability for maintenance and construction of six storm drain crossings to be required by Indus- trial Assessment District. License is only effective when work is performed. 1. Set Public Hearing Date of June 2, 1982 for: Appeal of Planning Commission Approval for Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 11893 - C/L Builders: a custom lot subdivision of 17.2 acres of land into 36 lots in the R -1- 20,000 and R- 1- 12,000 zones located on the south side of Banyan, west of Sapphire - APN 1043 - 411 -01. J. Approval of a Resolution appointing officers and agents to accept deeds on behalf of the city. _ RESOLUTION NO. 82 -83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNIA, APPOINTING OFFICERS AND AGENTS TO ACCEPT DEEDS ON BEHALF OF Ti!E CITY. A 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS , Notion to uphold eha P•c. A. ZONE CHANGE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -08 (TT 11928) 'a 'he SHAF FG ES. D V it proposed planned eve op- density at 59 units .r, al on Ccn tow%use units on 5.85 acres of land loco- 11.85 acres; plus the other ted on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archi- conditions. increasing the bald Avenue - APN 201 - 252 -32. visitor parking within the ` developcnt, an4 condition the ORDINANCE NO 165 (second reading) o7a Creneativs detaign to the Design ROViev AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Con. for design review approval. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. RE- Ordinance No. 165 changed, gave ZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL H04BER 201- 252 -3 2 first reading, snt 2nd reading FROM R- 1- 10,000 TO R- 2 /P.D. FOR 5.85 ACRES for may 19. carried 5 -0 GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGH- LAND. EAST OF ARCHIBALD. I ' Nayar set 2nd reading B. EFIVIROMME14TAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 81 -02 My • T YER: t nge o zone rom R- I (singTe- family residential) to R- 3 /P.0. (mu161p.e family rest- , ` .. dential /planned development) and the cevelopment of 44 ° ' patio homes and 322 townhouse units or, 35 acres of < ' ' land in the R -1 zone located on the south side of Arrow,•',: between Turner and Center Avenues - APN 209091 -05, 06, °r ° _- and 07. J-1 1Y P' C 4 i' P y :•s 1, • t1 City Council Agenda 2nd roadtng act for May 29. �- tinurl to Jana J. approved 5 -0 approved 5 -0 approved 5-0 approved 5 -0 -4- May 5, 1982 ORDINANCE NO. 175 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONrN, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PAJ.CEL NUMBER 209- 091-05, 06, 07 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW, BETWEEN TURNER AND CENTER AVEK�IES FROM R -1 TO R'•3 /P.D. C. VACATION OF UTINECESSARY STRE /:YS AND ALLEYS WITHIN THE ICTORI PROJFC Recomiend tat unc co— n�T tinu0 he— publiiclia, ring until Jure 2, 1982 when the tract maps are submitted for final approval. 5 CITY MAVAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. A. RESOLt410N CLARIFYING CCJHCIL POLICY ON GENERAL PLAN 1I RD-ISE LEt1ENT FORT T POR ON OF Y BORDERED B Z`iTY -L ^F I F R E D OR F— 1 1 YLN 0 WE ND YAN .! T OU . Staf rtwrc y Jac am RESOLUTION A0. 82 -81 A RESOLUTION W THE CTTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, STATING COUVCIL POLICY REINFORCING AND CLARIFYING TdE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE POLICIES FOR THAT PORTION OF THE CITY BORDERED BY THE CITY LIMIT ON THE WEST AND NORTH, HAVEN TO THE EAST, AND BVIYAN TO THE SOUTH. D. APPROVAL OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH SAN aERNARDINO COUNTY ON THEIR MORTGAGE BOND PROG to report y tc am. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -82 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN HOUSING FINANCE REVENUE BOND PROGRAM IN COOPERATION WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK T9 EXECUTE FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF,RANCHO'CUCAMONGA - + -•. -- A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY , OF-SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO - CUCAMONGA. City Council Agenda approved 5 -0 C. ADDENDUMS TO DESIGN CONTRACTS FOR INDUSTRIAL ASSESS- KENT DI_ R CT N0. 82-1. Staff report oy Lloyd Hobbs. Recommendation: Approval of a•ldendums to design cor- tract with Wtildan Associates. Lockwood Enqineer, a,.l Williamson 6 Schmid for Assess:^.nt District No. 8241 and to authorize the Mayor and City Clark to execute said contract changes. It is further recommended that Council authorize a loan to Assessment 0 strict No. 82 -01 in the amount of $93.000 to he drawn from Storm Drain and Systems Development funds. 6. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS. A. COUNCIL C"ITTEE APPOINTMENTS. see reverse slda for eppolntm^.nts. A. Jim Frost and Chuck Buqust delegated to meet vleeth staff T. ctTr`RTf6kfi€4 {f°R @F66f4'u" agvos teedfann rocuelvs Seysfoneaday. 0 ow g me® ng regarding potentf l llt1gatjo against the city. Ad oumed at 10:15 P.m. 8. ADJOUXIMENT. To adjourn to Breeat1m Session to recunrane at 7:00 P.M. on may 10 at the Llon•s Park Coamunity center for Plannlnf Co. 35104: Interview. Approved 5-0 6C. Dahl stated that each one has received a macro izom Jack Lan regarding architectural and /w^ design review. He requested flat this Item he placed on Lie Tune 26 agenda for discussion. I V Advisory Com<issione It was decided for cvunell to interview planning Comxtssionars first. To prescreen applicants on &belay, May 10, with final intorvicvs un Tuesdaye /fay I1, starting at 7,00 p.m. in the Lion-s park Commndty Center. Appointeonts will be determined after t:,w interviews and the roancil meting at which tboy will be aware Into office. Buquot and Dahl requested that the ordiranae bo reviewed which establishes the Advisory bunissian to sea ways in which the group could be strenthoned at the Juno 16 meeting. t. Council appointments: 3+ Finance Committee, Sc6lnrser /Bugcet a Park Acquisition Committees Frost /Dahl SLAG: lltkele /Schlosser i� SANBAG, Mlkele/Fzost 11• Omaltrans, Frost /Mlkels i Nest valley Transit ATMY.y+ ProJt /Dahl n: City Plead Control Coscsittess Frost /Dahl Zone S Plood Control Com,lttee: Nnyor /Mayor pro tom Soil Erosion and Dustr Control Board, Schlasser/Frosc .y Jf' Foothill Freeway: Frost /Buquet F� Ontario airport O.ound Amos Study Con.: Mikels /Senlosser City Selection C � etaes Mayor /Mayor pro-tem , Citrus Belt Lange of Calllornla Cities: Pros.1nequot Cawo Mayors and Presidents Comitteo: Mayorlmyor Fro Ten Frlvate-Publlc Coalitions Mayor /Mayor pro tam. Sques;rian Trails Comlte", Dahl /Proat ti Etivauda Specific plans Prost /Dahl Advisory Com<issione It was decided for cvunell to interview planning Comxtssionars first. To prescreen applicants on &belay, May 10, with final intorvicvs un Tuesdaye /fay I1, starting at 7,00 p.m. in the Lion-s park Commndty Center. Appointeonts will be determined after t:,w interviews and the roancil meting at which tboy will be aware Into office. Buquot and Dahl requested that the ordiranae bo reviewed which establishes the Advisory bunissian to sea ways in which the group could be strenthoned at the Juno 16 meeting. i 1 AC7'loas .' RANCHO CUCAMONGA - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA Lion's Park Community Center ,'.'•% 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Hay S. 1982 - 7:00 p.m. at 7,09 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER. a. Roll Call: Frost = . Schlosser r . Buquet : Dahl .x , and MikeT± . approved 5 -0 for b Approval of Minutes: April 7 and April 21. 1982. '7rpri?7S' and RuVat abstained on April 7 minutes 2. STAFF REPORTS. A. PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS. a ooroveA s -0 RESOLUTION NO. RA82 -3 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNIA, FRTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF PROJECTS AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS WITHIN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA. n•.wrtno wA1m.r�M nt 3. ADJOURNMENT. 7,15 P.M. `✓�iM;�:- 3.1"kf;i �.; ..� ;t '95,3?,ti - ��..t� `�•,: �. - �, •_'•rj��'S y,, iV;V+:Ti.[• i'.' f�{ i`• �`' wtf: ''J3R.s`!.�e�i�"�"2'!a:Y:�'.,.. • :f / - _i"h "al:N.".h"„ �'t+'..'. u ACTroffs . c�`cA•NO^ 3p CTi'Y OF 1 / � R'A�NU-10 CL AN10WA 'v A AGENDA VV Z 1777 Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamorga, California Regular Meeting - 7:30 p.m. All Items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be In writing. Tbo deadline for submitting these Items Is f -00 p.m. an the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office recat.es all such items. at 7,35 p.m. 1. CALL TO OFDER. A. Pledge of Alleg.ance to Flag. B. Roll Call: Frost r , Schlosser r , Buquet r , Dahl z , and Mikels r . approved -0 for C. Approval of Minutes: March 17, April 7, April April .1. D&W a,.d 20 and April 21, 1982. Buguet abstalnol for March 17, Mrrcctad Apr11 7, and April 20 minutes 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS. Bridge not present to a. Presentation of Proc::mations recognizing Phillip rorotve proetematton D. Schlosser and Arthur H. Bridge. b. May 8 -15, 1982 - SPRING CLEAN SWEEP MEEK: (1) Presentation of Proclamation (2) Poster Contest Awards (3) Description of Activities: May 8 - Speclil Trash Deposit Day. C Monday. May 10, 7:00 p.m. - FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING - Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road d. Tuesday. May 11. 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL COMMISSION MEETING - Lion's Park Community Center, 9161, Base - Line Road. e. Thursday. May 27, 7 :00 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING - Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base., "' Line Road. AM f. Tuesday, June 8 7:00 p.m. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAM * "' ''•t _ °° MEETING Etlwanda Intermediate School, 6925 Etiwanda't" �qCK tyyyi L r ` ;ak . o {'s, Avenue. : '• ti `try ` v I`b�i'' F a-.-' v�iT��: l�in•: iY:`an.'�4�i?1'•'�e�`4�.�'.•.. ` ;i:*.k 3'N is I 1` J h A v, City Council Agenda -2- may S. 1982 approved S -o 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. She follwing Cen nt Calendar !tear are expected to be routine and non- controvaratal. They will be acres upon by the Council at ore time vlthout diacuaslon. a. A7proval of Warrants, register no. 82 -5 -5 in the amount of $487,525.09. b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Gloria M. and Jack A. Anderson, Regina Farmer JacL's Restaurant, 12892 Foothill Blvd., for on -sale general eating place c. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Haueh Pin and Hyun Hoe Wang, China Alley, 627n Foothill Blvd., for on -sale beer and wine, eating place. d Alcoholic Beverage Application for Dina L. and Fabian F. Scarplre, Jr., Scarpine's Lunch Stop, 9631 Besiness Center Drive, Suite G. for off -sale beer and wine. e. ,lcreptarce of Bonds and Agreement for Minor Director is -tew 82 -08 - Bougher and Brogles, located at 8270 Fuathiil Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Cl-.* OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALI- FORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPRIDi" SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR Pr.VIEW NO. 82 -08. f. Change of Street Name from Center Avenue to Ivy Lane in Tract No. 9458. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNIA, CHANGING THE NAME OF CENTER AVENUE WITHIN TRACT 9458 TO IVY LANE g. Easement, Agreement with City of Ontario.: RecomendlY, approval of easement agreement with the,City of;Ontario to provide right -of -way on Milliken A6enue-re0frido,,_ for street construction to conjunction with;lndus= trial Assessment District. Provision of'agreeant„ only effective with District toation: . + ' . '. no N�.}$$gggqr }rs' V.A } It A City Council Agenda -3- May 5, 1982 h. License Agreeme-ts with Santa Fe Railroad Recommend approval of license with railroad assuming responsi- bility and liability for matntenance and construction of six storm drain crossings to be required by indus- trial Assessment District. License is only effective when work is performed 1 Set Public Heering Date of June 2, 1982 for: Appeal of Planning Commission Approval for Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 11893 - C/L Builders: a custom lot subdivision of 17.2 acres of land into 36 lots in the R -1- 20,000 and R- 1- 12,000 zones located on the soutn side of Banyan, west of Sapphire - APN 1043 - 411 -01. J. Approval of a Resolution appointing officers and agents to accept deeds on behalf of the city. RESOLUTION NO 62 -83 A RE's UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C1,( OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALI- FORNIA., APPOINTING OFFICERS AND AGENTS TO ACCEPT DEEDS ON 9EHALF OF THE CITY. 4. PIBLIC HEARINGS Myer sot and re -e j Trr�tag— i?rlt� - B. 1' ZONE CHANGE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -08 (TT 119281 SHAFFERj'ISTLA`,1 VENTURE: A proposed planned dev_— men, of 67 town�ouse units on 5.85 acres of land loca- ted on the north side of Hfgnland Avenue, Last of Archi- bald Avenue - APN -01- 252 -32. ORDINANCE NO. 165 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAVCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RE- ZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 252 -32 FROM R- 1- 10,000 TO R -2 /P D. FOR 5.85 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGH- LAND, EAST OF ARCHIBALD. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 31 -02 TT 1__ j_ __M_AYER: A ,hangs of zone ram R -1 (sink family re residential) to. R- 3 /P.D. (multiple_famtly rest- _ dential /planned development) and the devetopaient•of 44, patio homes and 322 townhouse units on 35 dcres•op' land in the R -1 lone located on the south side of Arrow, between Turner and Center Avenues - APR 209 - 091- 05,A061rq and 07. Nrtlon to uphold th P.C. A - denulty at 59 units total on 5.85 acres, plus the other YY ConditfOnrs lnereasing the ;?•- visitor parking vithin the • development, and condition the C; Vovoiomaxnr- plan-'& r-rantativo ' design to the rVSlgn Review Can. for design review approval Ordinance No. 165 changed, gave firs- reading, set 2nd reading ;n, K for may 19 e..rrled 5 -0 Myer sot and re -e j Trr�tag— i?rlt� - B. 1' ZONE CHANGE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81 -08 (TT 119281 SHAFFERj'ISTLA`,1 VENTURE: A proposed planned dev_— men, of 67 town�ouse units on 5.85 acres of land loca- ted on the north side of Hfgnland Avenue, Last of Archi- bald Avenue - APN -01- 252 -32. ORDINANCE NO. 165 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAVCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RE- ZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 201 - 252 -32 FROM R- 1- 10,000 TO R -2 /P D. FOR 5.85 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGH- LAND, EAST OF ARCHIBALD. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 31 -02 TT 1__ j_ __M_AYER: A ,hangs of zone ram R -1 (sink family re residential) to. R- 3 /P.D. (multiple_famtly rest- _ dential /planned development) and the devetopaient•of 44, patio homes and 322 townhouse units on 35 dcres•op' land in the R -1 lone located on the south side of Arrow, between Turner and Center Avenues - APR 209 - 091- 05,A061rq and 07. i. i r. a City Council Agenda , 2nd reading ant for May 29. cantlnued to June 2. -A- 1 May S. 1982 ORDINANCE 40. 175 (first reading) AN ORDIHA.YCE CF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANL1�1 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 209- 091-05, 06, 07 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW, BETWEEN TURNER AND CENTER AVENUES FROM R -1 TO R-3/P.1 C VACATION OF UNNECESSART STREETS AN' ALLEYS WITHIN THE tt OR AA- 6ROJEC . Reco�maend—tWa—t 1'wnct c— e-1 ntirue t r pu0 c ear n9 until June 2, 1 1? when the tract maps are submitted for final appro tt. 5 CITY MARASER'S STAFF REPORTS. approw•t 5-0 A. RESOLUTION CLARIFYING COUNCIL POLIUI ON CSNERAL PLAN- LAND USE ELEMENT FOR THAT PORTION R' c y BORPEREDWY CITY LIMIT ON €)L RYfi' i F QBY_X4RU —ELAN _ T6T�10 TI —S—ta. report y ac lam. sppriinid °'-0 RESOLOTIW NO. 82 -81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, STATING COUNCIL POLICY RETHFORCING AND CLARIFYING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE POLICIES FOR THAT PORTION OF THE CITY BORDERED BY THE CITY LIMIT ON THE WEST AND NORTH, HAVEN TO THE EAST, AND BANTAM TO THE SOUTH. approved 5-e B APPROVAL OF A CDOPERATI VE AGREEMENT WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ON THEIR MOkTGAGE BONO PROGRAM. Staff report by acCa—im. approved 5 -0 RESOLUTION NO. « -4c A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COI 4.IL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, C. IFO94IA,. ADOPTING AN HOUSING FINANCE REVENUE BOND PROGRAM IN COOPERATION WITH 1HE COINrTY_ , OF SAN BERNARDINO AND AUThOR1ZING THE '• r MAYOR A11D CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE FOR, AND ' ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiiRGA y= A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT OETAEEN THE COUNTY OF Sjdl BERNARDING AND THE CITY OF RANCHO ' CUCAMONGA, S'fb', •' )��J i5� Y. �I " T��/ �� yyy ]� +��y=��1. V � 'yr„ 11 "ZZI111 YyV`�{' rya-. p�lj.. fill 15�Q`a�_ '•1V,? ::kp `�µ� r City Council Agenda -5- May 5, 1982 c` approved 5-0 _- C. ADDENDUMS TO DESIGN CONTRACTS FOR INDUSTRIAL ASSESS - ENT DISTRICT N O. 82-1. Staff report by oy u s. i' Recommendation: Approval of aAdendums to design con - t ^act with Milldan Associates, Lockwood Engineer, and Williamson 8 Schmid for Assessment District No. 82 -01 and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said contract charges. �+ It is further recommended that Council authorize a "., loan to Assessment District No. 82 -01 in the amount Y of $93,000 to be drawn fray Storm Drain and Systems Development funds. w, 6. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS, 1 A. COUNCIL COMMITTEE APPOINTME4'S. - sea reverse side for appointments. !- B. JJim Frtossmtfand Chuck Buq ^.et delegated to meat With staff 7. CITY ATT8R�t1'gaR�NJN fS.x )ieeqquestteedfann xecu v sganvasdey. p follw7 g�dLrg pctentiat lltigatl ^n against the S city Q Adjourned at 10,15 p.m. 8. ADJOURNMENT. k, rr lei To adjourn to Brecvtive Soxsion to reconvene at 7,00 p.m. on may 10 at the Ion's Park coax pity Canter for Planning Comcis3lon incerviewa. Approead 5-0. 6C. Bah1 Stated that each one has received a memo from Jack lam regarding architacturu1 and /or design review. Be rcquos4'd that this item he placed on the Jurm 16 agenda for dis.russicn. r, �n r council appointments, i" Finance Committee, Schlosser "Bugnat Pert Acgulsltiun Comm ttear Prvat /Debi SCACr Mfksls/Seb."Ser SANBA^., Nike's /Proet Cff,itrans, Fr Mt/Nlkols N Nest Valley I unit Agency, Frew /Dahl f City Flood Control Committee FrosC/Dah1 Eons 1 Flood Control Committee, Ndyorraayor pro tem F; Soil Erosion and Dustr Control WArdt Schlossar/Prost i _ Foothill Freeway, Frost /BuGvet O.Itario Airpr rt Crwmd Attest Study CM. t Nlkels /SChloaler t City Selection ca—let", Mayor /mayor (uv -tea Cltaus Belt Lergna of California Cltiest Frost /Duguet CBNND MAyors end Presidents Coral ttaet Mayor/Mayor Pro Tem Private - Public Coal, tic,, Mayor /Nayor pro tea. '. Sques Crlan rralls Committee, Dahl /Frost Stivanda Specific Plan, Frost /Dahl ' Advisory Comamisslonr It was decided for council to interview Planning Cormissioners first 7o prescreon applicants on Monday, May 10, with final Interviows on Tuesday, Nay 11, starting at 7,00 p.m. in the Lion's Park Community Cantor. Appointments will be determined after the Interviews and the council mucting at which they will be sworn Into office. Buquot and Dahl :,quested that the ordinance be reviewed which astablishme the Advisory Camdsslcn to aee ways In which the group could be strenthined at the June 16 meeting. F s, \1 3 ' PJINCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA Lion's Park Comunity Center 9161 Dase Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, Califoroin May G. 1982 - 7:00 o_m. 1. CALL TO ORDER. a. Roll Call: Frost S<hlosse T, 8uquet_, Dahl.._, and Nttels_. b. Approval of Minutes: April 7 and April 21, 1982. 2. ST;TF F.EPORTS. _ A. PROJECT RFVIEU PROCESS. RESOLUTION NO. RA82 -3 A RI JLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF WE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALI- FORNIA. ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE REYIE6 OF PROJECTS AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS NITHIN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA. 3. ADJOURNMENT. .r. 0 L CITY 05 RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 5, 1982 T0: Redevelopment Agency FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS BACKGROUND: When the Agency adopted the Redevelopment Plan, the members nd sated their interest in reviewing development proposals in the pro- ject area for their approval. Whilc the Agency desired the above It did not necessarily want to pass on all proposals since this wouiJ pose additional time in the development review process, especially for those YetjthesAgency had wasnuncertainieven about those since the Agency felt's Indirectly perhaps, these could affect other projects which did relate to specific redevelopment proposals. The Agency thus asked staff to look at some type of policy resolution for its discussion. Staff has looked at all classes of projects possible in the project area. First it should be noted that aside from possible agreements that the Agency might approve with a developer or project owner, there is no difference in the review of projects or difference in the application of development standards for projects in tile project area. Thus, all private projects that might relate to sore financing arrangement areesubjectpto either write disposition agree entsscievelopmplacement. ntc grneements.) owner participation agreements, etc These automatically require Agency review and approval by taw. Also, all public projects require the same. These projects are in a specific class and are easy to define. All other projects have no correlation with the Agency and since Agency members did not discuss exactly what Indirect impacts these projects might be reviewed for, the only avenue left is for tome type of direct review of all other projects. The least stringent "direct* review process is for these projects to be placed on consent calendar of the Agency. If there is further review necessary, the project may be pilled. However, this would require all projects within the project area cannot be approved until cleared through consent calendar of the Agency, thus adding up to two weeks of additional review time Until further revised, this is how all other projects usssioe treated on see the needeforetheseiprojectstto receive afthr "direct" review, the Agency members could request staff to Prepare a weekly aporoval list of projects so that during the appeal periods if City Council Agenda Project Review Process may S. 1982 Page 2 Agency med)ers wish to review any project, an appeal could be establisied, Zhu$ carrying over the project to the next Agency meeting. This would have the affect of reviewing only those projects the Ageary feels necessary and s, not subject all projects to the additional delay. ' Another bytneP Planning Commission. pAlleAgency significance and receivettheliAgenndavAnd Action �jend. Possibly the Action Agenda would be sufficient. u, RECOWENDATION: Staff recommends the Agency discuss the various mttnods n le_i kage and take the the p oject area) having no direct �•rir•ieicpment Y Res"AlCP a JACK ?? Director of Community Development "r JL:jr d' i yAttachment Resolution 1. . J,• dy 2' �i-,, ,� Ar _ c� '°'d'^•Y'c.�a'+t;= [ <i.�°•.Rti•' ySY.t ;try',i !' _ � . "y ;' 0 lJ RESOLUTION NO. R^A 82 -3 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF PROJECTS AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS G. WITHIN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA r WHERFAS, pursuant to Section 331 of the Rancho Redevelo ent Plan within the Redevelopmenteprojectparea. excepttin conformance otherwise with the Redevelopment Plan. WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Redevelopment Agency to assure compatibility with the requirements of the Plan by reviewing, when necessary, development plarei (whether private or public) in the Redevelopment Project area. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga provides as follows: SECTION 1: That the following projects shall be subject to review and aptrov_aT by the Redevelopment Agency as action agenda items: 1. Projects that require owner participation agreements. 2. Projects s which requ agreements. rope disposition agreements a 3. Projects which require revenue bond financing. 4. All other projects requirency participation --SECTION 2: The following projects are to be considered for a approval by Re evelopment Agency on the Consent Calendar unless otherwise requester': 1. All subdivision`. of more than four lots. 2. All residential 3rojects of more than four lots. 3 All industrial and commercial projects SECTION 3. The secretary of the agency shall certify the adoption o ,s solution. PASSED, APPROVED, aad ADOPTED this 5th day of May, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: 4• .i f_ t • • M •• MI Lion's Park Community Center 9161 Boss Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Regular Meeting - 7:30 p.m. All Stems submitted for the City Coancil Agenda mist be In writing. She deadline for submitting these items is stop p.m. on the Wednesday prior tm the meeting. The city clerk's office receives all much Items. 1. CALL TO ORDER. A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 8. Roll Call: Frost Schlosser , Buquet_, Dahl—=. and Mikeli C. Approael of Minutes: March 17, April 7, April 20 and April 21, 1982. 2. ANNOUNC .NTS. a. Presentation or Proclamatfons recognizing Philttp D. Schlosser and Arthur H. 8rldge. b. May 8 -15, 1982 - SPRING CLEAN SWEEP MEEK: (1) Presentation of Proclamation (2) Poster Contest Awards (3) Description of Activities: May 8 - Special Trash Deposit Day. c. Monday. May 10, 7:00 p.m. - FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING - Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Poad d. Tuesday, May 11, 7:00 p.m. - HISTORICAL COMMISSION MEETING - Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Rase Line Road. e. Thursday. Nay 27, 7:00 p.m. - ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING - Lion's Park Community Center. 9161 Rase: Line Road. ._ f. Tuesday, June 8, 7:00 p.m. - ETIWANDA Si MEETING - Etiwanda Intemedlate School,' — " s Avenue. ,a City Council Agenda • .7 t' 1 r 3 5 3� 7 i 9 15 17 18 -2- Nay 5, 1982 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. The following "i*ant ca-an, .r - _e= a arpectad to be rontlna " :or_:. +• cans a1. Joey w111 be aetod upon b9 tla. LOiur11 at ors tJm. .lthove dt+cwaton. a. Approval of Warrants, register no. 62 -5 -5 in the amount of $487,525.09. b. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Gloria M. and Jack A. Anderson, Regina Farmer Jack's Restaurant, 12892 Foothill Blvd., for on -sale general eating place. c. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Haueh Pin and Hyun Hoc Mang, China Alley, 8270 Fc'ithill Blvd , for on -sale beer and wine, eating place. d. Alcoholic Beverago Application for Dina L. and Fabian F. Scarpine, Jr., Scarpina's Lunch Stop, 9631 Business Center Drive, Suite G. for off -sale beer and wine. e. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement for Minor Director Review 82 -08 - Rougher and Br3gles, located at 8270 Foothill Boulevard. EESOLUTION NO. 82 -79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PMCHO CUCANONGA. CALI- FORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR PEVIEH NO. 82 -08. I Change of Street Nava from Center Avenue to Ivy Lane In Tract No. 9458. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ITY OF RANCHO CUCA.40NUA, CALI- FORM A. CHANGING THE NAME OF CENTER AVEHUe 41THIN TRACT 9458 TO IVY LANE g. Easement Agreement with City of Ontario. Recommend ` approval of easement agreement with the City-of Ontario to provide right -of -way on Hiiliken Avenue required. for street construction in coniunction with Indus trial Assessment District. Provision of agreemant only effective with District formation. '? Ou ,p City Council Agenda L 3- May 5, 1582 Z3 License Agreements with Santa Fe Railroad. Recommend 31 34 �A 34 i S 35 6. F' 6 6� t Fe "' k .r' L approval of license oath railroad assuming resoonsi- bility and liability for maintenance and const'uction of six storm drain crossings to be rialuired by Indus- trial Assessment District+ License Is only effective when work is performed. 1. Set Public Hearing Cate of June 2, 1982 for: Appeal -- of Planning Commission Approval for Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 118P3 - C/L Builders: a custom lot subdivision of 17.2 acres if land into 36 lots In the R -1- 20,000 and R- 1- 12,000 :ones located on the south side of Banyan, west of Sapphire -.APR 1043- 411 -01. j. Approval of a Resolution appointing officers and agents to accept deeds on behalf of the city. RESOLUTIOy 40. 82-85 A RESOLUTION PF T'IE CITY COUI4CIL OF _ THE CITY OF RANCH) CUCAW.JNGA, CALI- FORMA. APPOL TING OFFICERS ANO AGENTS TO ACCEPT DEEDS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. _ It ,rl 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. A. ZONE CHANGE FOR PLANNED lEVELOPMENT 140. 81 -08 (TT 11928 V5NAFFER[MESTIAND VENTURE: A proposed planned develop - ment o d7 townhouse units on 5 85 acres of land loca- ted on the north side of H1ghlAnd Avenue, east of Archi- bald Avenue - APR 201- 252 -32. ORDINANCE NO. 165 (second reading) AN OROIIUUICE CF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. kE• - ZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 20.452 -32 FROM R -1- 10,000 TO R -2 /P.D FOR 5.85 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE C: HIGH- ' LA.NO, EAST OF ARCHIBALD. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELCPt1091` 81 -02 1' ITT 9 - MAY ER A change of zone frc R- I (single family residential) Lo R-3/P.D. (multiple fdmily resi- dential /planned development) and the developunt of 44 ',r patio homes and 322 townhouse units on 35 acres of - land in the R -1 zone located on tha south side of Arrow, L between Turner and Center Avenues - A.gN 209 - 091 -05, 06 and 07. ;� , �' ', '�� .. �r1 i •: P `� i . �.Y..- .1 iY: L^i.: _ "' r ..rrJ . :h'r, - : L':r11I er-,� 1 } City Council Agenda -A- May 5, 1,982 , 37 ORDINANCE NO. 175 (first reading) 1M ORDINANCE -OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA„ REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 209- 091-05, 06, 07 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE- , OF ARROW, BETWEEN TURNER AND_CENTER AVENUES FROM R -I TO R- 3 /P.D. 79 C. VACATION OF UNNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN -THE FIC*OORIA PRO C. Re€iT coomend trot unc cent nue — 1Fe_pn c ear n9,until June 2, 1982 when the tract f maps ara submitted for final approval. S. :TTY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. 81 A. RESOLUTION CLARIFYING COUNCIL POLICY ON GENERAL PLAN LAS N F L ,h`1 —PUR F C RDE LIMIT M „ , A ?j- 1�S1813AN TO IME 5 I. Latarr report by jacK LAID .46'r- I 82 RESOLUTION 90. 82 -81 A RESOLUTION OF ThE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, STATING COUNCIL POLICY REINFORCING AND CLARIFYING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE POLICIES FOR THAT PORTION OF THE C1T�� BORDERED BY THE CITY UNIT Ot THE.6AS'( lW AND NORTH, HAVEN TO 1Hf WyETr i0 BANYAN TO THE SOUTH. Y 83 R APPROVAL OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH SAN BERNARDINO ro-UN-Ty-TUTREIR MORTGAGE -0 D PR06RAM. Staff report by Jack am. 86 RESOLUTION NO. 82 -82 , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE "•y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, - ADOPTING AN HOUSING FINANCE REVENUE BOND ;n PROGRAM IN COOPERATION WITH,711E COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND AUTHORIZING THE - MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE FOR AND ON BEH'.LF OF -THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAXONGA A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE'CO1 U1TY`�`f" ? t OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO, . CUCAMONGA ti 1 Lr� .'i T s lyY ai' "4i �5ii+3,RtCYw'2.Ti= .�:±Y} City Council Agenda lr• s 90 s 0 S' : 112 �s I t' E.f. -5- Nay S. 1982 C. ADC"D! TO DESIGN CONTRACTS FOR INDUSTRIAL ASSESS FiEnT 1 R C to report DY L10YG WHS. Recomeendation: Approval of addendum3 to design con- tract with Willdan Associates, Lockwood Engineer. and Williamson b Schmid for Assessment District No. 82 -01 and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to ozecute said contract changes. It Is further recommended that Council authorize a loan to Assessment District No. 82 -01 in the amount of $93,000 to be drawn from Storm Drain and Systems Development funds. 6. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS. A. COUNCIL COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS. 7. Cart ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. 8. ADJOURRMENT. „ a ` T ,i' yaG�ln ♦i:4�„ Copy"wd.M�e.�.�ee�.. Q a Il.e 1aN1. Al n. TV. lle. -7.. K.*.rIw oat. 00, "PLICATION FOR ALCOHOUC SEVERAGI UCINSI(F) pa.tromf of AkaboFK Sereroge Cony 121SOshut San Bernardino SaaanxNO. CeGf. 93f1A 1Tre rmderppnd Mre67 app8er la FKemr df/brbed as formt.0 1. TTFE(S) OF UCENSEM FRE NO. On We General Eating Place Appged ands Sec 240" Q Effusive Data Iaswmce t — RECEF NO. f>Ob80 GEOGRAPHICAL GODe Den 121aad 2. NM/E(S) OF APPLICANT(S) Temp' Perait 021918 IReclln Data 4/27/82 A&MER S. Gloria R. & Jack A. 2. TYPE($) OF TRANSACTION(S) FEE LK- TSTE Per.Taf. s 1250. 4 r• ilozm,i %aintar Jackla RoatmxmntCT 22 ADMINISTRATION C NGA S Loudon of EPYner —Nv be, and SveN 12892 Foothill Blvd. APR 2a'gB2 AY �� ryry *?:A"=O p4`cR11O11ga 91739 San BGTDBrd o ! TOTAL S -1250.001 & If Fremset peened. 7. An Premkee Ind" Shaw Type of Unnse 47_ 118924 aty Undh? Yes 1. fgDT2 g Sioerra dVRnt fr RNe Cauea cIN » . frol n«) CA 91730 _ PEX4 9. time TAY ma been canvktd of a fekmy7 10. Hon you ever vwlabd any of the pm k1om of " AkohaDc /. 2mroge Control Ad nr NgV m of the Departmm pen / () Q tatNnq w the Atli /J ^ 11. Ea0Nn a'TEV mr.r w item 9 Or 10 ce an anatunent which shatl be deemed part of this opprcosm M AppUm., agree (a) that o" ewnager empin d N en-wle 0cend peemttee YiR bon a0 the roaegTKOAm of o kemAq and (b) that 1. 11 ml Nato's w coats or pemdt to W Nofotd Any of dw prmatans al the Aieshefk est"roge Control Ad. r 10. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Canty OF San Bornardino _ Date .. e.err r....e. N ..en ..a. •rr N.... ryrre Vw..r fMr..n.er re r.. tt) 1. Y M w•ae.t r ... N e• ...ate .e.. N n r11 r4r N Iw .re Nn• at M r .wr .M e. Y rNMr i a N .. a W ..•tt.e.. V �Nr 14 APPUCANT f la M Y ....rr wry « ..nw wrM /..w �.. V .N.t7 M wrr N • .� r Y 1NY r .r.r.r arYM Yw ter• er N.Nr Aa e.rr rrr.eM, h M � ...r.lr .wr.i« Y ore .+s r tY•.ar . Y W r .read • rNwr. Y . M wr a.ar N wrww. r N Mr..a r Y... ♦ Mr N d...r� (A re.. M .wr. wIMrM r. V .W+.. W N.r M ..Ie..rr r M Orr W r r...tlM MAN r hSIGN HERE 'APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 4n5�a2 GTATE OF CALIFORNIA county of gp Bernardino _ Dan o.....•.o. N sre.f...d ...r - • - - w�.+r wee... t.N.....eM w w.. lA M Y M M1.r... r r.r.Yr .as N e..wdr. er..... rr.1 N e. t.re.Ye .rlr ...arn.A iN w+rZO s M. W .rd..•stew . N tZa, to M Y WA, .dn rA. N .rrr- V I.rrrM N M wre.e 4rNa MwYN MN. N V .rJr rr9 N Y• rNt�...e/r I.r.a.. �e w b w. /weer. N W •..a..rtr w .er..r r... NN w n...b.• M. rr..W Y M r ... r4 ww'a ..•a.n.+ Y W .M Y errwr r N .N• r ..r.sAd . YN.... N r t. w .nNr N Yra.r•1 . Y M4.0 . tri...v wrww Nr 1V +r wr .....M ...er.rN..b M a..[n.. sI NY. sY aeN.•r. r M Prr...r• .aY r r•YIM1e Mih N Y 0...r.rl r r -fit t /ler.:ld Y! tk.m.N.� �:n +«wFi _.... 17. $oi.eAtre A of emeeld II. Lkeme •�jncii:� flan �cJ�en�'�nra -� Ioc�«l Cv V% rVf .. Ja Cerra++- of F-OVA i; tiwa.J 2 1 s t ° "" I �Vasan� t $erviu I >: t t N ��•• gyp/ ' / V Lry2N (b'tia. !?M ie t �?7�Crt�BI Zaad: G -Z l� 41 copy"ead.10-.16--awn,na J wPbe _#1ICAT(ON FOR AECOHOUC BEVERAGE UCENSE(S) 1 Tee DepamwM of Akobolk Barstow Control RECEIPT NO. i 1213 O sbeu San Bernardino f rM be star W" A6" 7bb Lh -w Meedgwtero Coke O.ly . TYPE(S) OF UCENSE(s) FILE NO. Sacramento, Cott. 93314 i crrreet ee..r reeeff.rr B1T3110 PALCB CODE 3615 } The u d.rc:pned funby appTwe fa 10593 Doe _#1ICAT(ON FOR AECOHOUC BEVERAGE UCENSE(S) 1 Tee DepamwM of Akobolk Barstow Control RECEIPT NO. i 1213 O sbeu San Bernardino f 012 a= 81(LLR i Et9TT GEOGRAPHICAL Sacramento, Cott. 93314 i crrreet ee..r reeeff.rr B1T3110 PALCB CODE 3615 } The u d.rc:pned funby appTwe fa Doe kenwe % abed a fo0orr . • - ✓ issued 1•.7. NAME(S, JP APPUCAM(S) Temp hrNt . l Apoed under Sec 240" (] ^' ,• " =Me Usash Pin h RM ERecdro Don 1/1/82 EReWro Dote, 3. TYPE(S) OP TRANSACTIONS) FEE UG ME 291iF y.:: • S 300.00 41 ADEERLL ` 184.00 4' Warne a mane" Ch13u A11c CT 8.02 Apply receipt 935911 - SBt-560s88 --SeN •W EOLad0I1 of RNinH.- NYTb1. and 3heM r 0270 Yooth111 Blvd. and 2.•p Code County ''e�itanaho S CUcvwnaa 91730 MW TJD�. TOM 2k e� V. Mme you e , been cenrlcred of o f@Wm)7 A r 1. Erplein o r1•ES' ansrw m trams 9w .0 an en attodu 7. An Pt"m inside iD Nave you eta Notated ary • Baronage Control Act a re talvkp to due Ad! p whkh shelf be desmd port d tfis apt pa d' 12. AppOCont ognn (a) tho, ory menogw employed N o"oh limned premlwe Inns hen 01 the qualifications of o game, and (b) that be w{lf not .Moro or cave a pymtl ft be eiptotd any of the prondans al the Alcoholic Beverage Control Acs. 13. STATE OF CAUFOWA Crony of San Darnardin0 - -_ Defe _ I,/21/82_� •�� ll.err rrrrr J erYn. y rwr rrr.r rferu..e never en... MM J wrr 111 w 4 r rrr4, r r M r he w d rsrew : saw d r wrY.� ..rr..Y .Y.e Y r rw.rYe w.nrr i+r .irb.e w re. w r.erer Y w t.e.e, m i.r r w ...e r 1fn• 'antra .r.e..a.r .+ r... r r.nr..+.r r e.. w w r w r r.brY fswa ..s. r .ra m r+ •. err sass wY r rresYrr -. r rwaY.r M rr Mew Winn tiro. Y r rerrY.r.r w r.rrb.r' b.Yr. w M rJae .. r M1rrrlf: '+ rW eu. rrerbfirr b �f -la rr h w.nn wrr.«w. r wr.r rrM✓r Y M rr Y revs Y .new M . Inns « 4 We r rents rnwl I.rr .r err .Irrfr tRt inns Irrofre h in r ..rN r wyrr relfnWr Y CN rlp r arerr.ru « M Erb r rMKr r rrr....rb .r w rr w nMnr - •rirnr r M ee..e r ee...•...w a .....r.w, m r. r .w« .wnrflr ... r .ri..r ti ir. r .war « r u.... w ... ^++re taasr b 1 r errrrrrnn. X14. APPLICANT I t . tl �� * �,•,e{2 SIGN MERE APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR UII OF CAUFORMA County of _ _ _ _ _ Dam r er•• . J .r .r. r«Y assn ..rr..* .• w..n Erb.. "beat .rrrre .rlr .rears.. M erefrrsre w w Y r.rJw wrelu.lr Y IY bYrlrr U! r r Esser .sir rrrbrsw w rnW b b r re«b4 1s 4 Irr.Yre erbr ri b Yr.Mr rYr w r .war rLw rer er.b4 r r rrr« w+.r J sb ..raf.ir . g rr.A .W« b rre.rrre e7 r m " W er b ...t..wb.er r rr...fe ...I« Y r ..4r b .swan h erfrrrr r1 . V w b hmee re•rrrr .rfM Me r.rr .� Nb" Area /Miy r L. Y .W r Yrlr .waver. b W W r flfenrrr Y b eve Y rwYA . Orr N « M n Mfr J b'wer r b 4r..� w erl+e rw wY« M .rr.rr.rrr In IYrr M uerrl. r.rerpr .. M rY/nw M rtr r .. {,(� YrT r r Itfr.w MY rn Fr•Mry 4Hai b h Orewf•ri. ��'Cr- '- bataat':27�."'ry.,s qrn -vs-- �._.� ��....._ � _•�:...., ... _., _ELY. La r.wy r �YgeWLO"- ;c! Sid � /aj p za ace-4 �es yeti. pfg& �aw tiarur{ I 1 ZoniNj _ i,. Z, .�'kfk E �. Al Y - w A.. Ts cI.r N..Nwn.x am. aW c0 yD.wlx !APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC REMADE LIC7NSE(S) ' 19japabmmi of Alcoholic (bveroge Coahol 1715 O Sant SoaameMa. CaLF. 95814 er.. .r..un r.v.w •.r.n.... The umf dgned bweby appSa far (knot dff -bed of fo8a.0 1. TYPE(S) CF LICEMOS) FILE NO. OPP SALE IIEYR i sarm Applied seder Sec 240" 13 E&N)n Dme 1 RECEIPT NO. 60696 GEODRAPtucAL CODE 3615 Don issued X NAMES) OF APPLICANT(S) Temp Permf 1 Effecti.o Date SCARPISE Diane L 6 PAbia P Jr Z TYPES) OF TILANSACTION(S) FEE LIC' TYPE U S SO-00 21L ANHIIAT, 26-40 L Name of 8vsimns Se aces to ^ S Lxation of Businns -Nvmbe and Stroa 4631 Dusinaca Crater Dr Suite 0. bCby and Lp Cede C�nh Ren,ha Fcic'ialAC T)_ Sl A - TOTAL S 76.40 6 If Premise Ucaned. 7. Am RemLM Wide (rain 5)- Number and SkM/ 9. Ha.e you eve been com)ded of a felony? IM Have Too ova woleteA am, of fM pro idaiu of the Alcoholic Beverage Cenhoi Act or rogviadara of the Department pen Aj fawn to the AaT (d.. v ' 11. fAp1oN a'YES' ans.er h itean 9 or 10 un an anathmem rho b shall oe detmed po J this application. 12 APPl.cant agrees (o) thof any eamger empbyed N on-sab licensed pead•es will hove a8 the gvaGfkaUaru of a Bconsev. and (b) stmt he .dl naf .blaze or ew.e a pored(ro ba .Lelotod any o! the pr"Wom; of I o Alaat 4 bewoge Control Act. 13. STATE Of CALIFORNIA CwAoy of San DOM=4ica _ Date — .A/216102 r + {td.. ✓t J .M+r..•.Y rr �Yr •leM.'r• rMr Nw. rnf{r ..Ir. of W Y Y •..ern r .r J M •ur•'�•• r r .•eel.. .ee J W ..dYr .rM+er. �� L .e• trwr •./Y•.ir. v.tr .•.•r1r1 r r1. e+....ewnr r r YrWr ra er V V rre .r {w.• vF eJY •.ru•ur w erw e. er~• .r•x .� r� W W JI J er ..r..a e..r rer r M of err Ir•r -' - .r h wM1w r •..a.••Y e.• .•r 4•.r r 1•I •n Irr•r L ew •.M•wt• r want Wr w V r• wLr ►. ee..Ja M .�J W M.rY.ar Y .rin to .r h .rrr •nJ.e.r r In.rJ .r..t. � .W r w.id. M ..rw.+ J . ler r r hL•1 r .ro•r .•YrJ Yr �. We .+JI leW eT ..•.•e•/ M ..I r Y .r.ir •r.iw r Y W .sr we a.w..r r w e••• r a.Jea • rJrr.r r r ti w war. J feM ti o r w tyre rr a.fr J ..n.rrr. {A e.r W ...Ir w.4Jr rr M .W+w Jar V q.ar .. Y 0_..k r .•.• e•Yay r M O.rwrw•. 11 APPLICANT A'N HERE Y rr - X \_ - >--+ -- --- --• ! APPLICATION A TMNSFEROR FTATE OF CAUhWItA Couny of _ _.._ __ _ ____ Date. IIWI ICI w.i..r..J .w Mwe Js•r. M.M• .•fw . rre4• N Mr lfl W Y de ewr, r r ..•.eY..ar J M r•N.•• •..••� r•.•e k r. frw•.e sw.d.. wrss...• Yr ..rw r w. eh .rrr e..e••ur r w Y.sJfr Mow be t•.•.. riw Marl•. le r..•er If Y W r.n.e e•.v4J Ar•i•e rk. rJ r . •r er r Y .r.aw.. rL'r s..wr Yarw1 r W war n..s+ J aY worer MM M W .r.lw Y wr.••i M M Y•nrr lD Y M ewrr •.ra.r•• r Irr.•e ..wrr Y v r4 4 re.er r• rrwrl J . Yr r w, Nye r •e'.w.. ••r..•e W wr .w Jry ..r• I...•a1 er en r ..Y. r. _ w' "_ 4 eYe X Y awrrr r M eJ• r pWW . .wMrrM r I.r •••I w1... J .M�r M r e.YMe r {.en. 1 rJW J Yrxrea {a or o....•sw MMrW w.r w . orrr.. h b•r r. 'yJYw r M ar.....i. M ..aoo•e riM1.. M M e...r.r M ife tin xt „T:: S:gn.hWo(q of Lkemeo(') - ll Memo Numli.r(s);, t SCa�int1s (uKal. Sfo� (�yti1 jn, i� 6f Arww.�,�bald. I� j - -1 iI -rdew Jul �' VOCS•f �+ f � S4 r a- 4V " subehe.i 3 ■ p.. Ll it 1, ♦ ♦ r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT .r DATE: May Si-i982. T0: t•.;, ouncil and City Manager ivn rROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT. Acceptance of Bonds and Agrva3ent for Minor Director Review 82 -08 Bcugher and Broyles The developers of M.O.r.. 8'[ -08, a chinese restaurant located at 8270 Foothill Boulevard have srbmitted the attached agreement end bonds for City Council acceptance. The bonds are for off -sits improvements including curb and gutter, side%alk, drive approach, street light parkway landscaping, and A.C. pavement. It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting the bolds and dgreement and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same. Respectfully suhmlt , v' LCH:BK:bc Attachments LihTtV..`,.,..r9`:$_?G1W,75.�.a �cn ix .s �s r sf RESOLUTION No. 71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AEEM NII �� AGREEMENT AMDMPROV IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR REVIEW NO. 82 -08 HHEREfS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on Nay S. 1982 by vw ary and Margaret Bougher and Gerald Brogles as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located at 8270 Foothill Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Impr^vement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in DirectoreRevviewtNo. real property as referred and WHEREAS. said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient ? mprovement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the save are hereby approved and the Mayor authorized to to atust thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Sth day of Nay. 1982. AYES: HOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Lauren n H Wassenwn, City Clerk 's Jon D. Mikeli, Mayor 7j • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA UIPRIVEMENT AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance vith the provisions of the Municipal Code and Pegulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporat•.on, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and betwe n said City and 6/wl Q' &--' A sic . C�n:t.PC.0r�14c;�j 4;:d ..rn�y.ar..:�� en , hereinafter�r erred to as - e�"b_e— velop —er. WITHESSETH, THAT, WHEREAS, pursuant to said Code, Developer has requested approval by the City of Minor Development Review No. a2 -08, in accordance with the provisions mf the report of the Community Development Director thereon, and any amendments thereto; located at 8270 Foothill Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the City has established certain requirements to be met by said developer prior to granting the final approval of tl.a development; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemeA to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THER_FORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as follows; ..........;t 1. The 4eveloper hereby agrees to construct at developer`s • N� expense all improvkments described on -page 3 hereof within 6 months fromgeif, the, date, hereof., (J 2. The term of this agreement shall be 6 months, commencing on the date of execution hereof by the City. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the last day of the term stipulated, unless said term has been extended as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to • complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than four weeks prior to the default date, and including a statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions hereof, including construction standards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when - warranted by substantial changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the Provisions of tJ s agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause ,aid provisions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupon to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and ex,.ense incurred in so doing. 5. Encroachment perm!ts shall be obtained by the Developer from th•, office of the City Engineer prior to start of any work within the public right -of -way, and the leveloper shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations contained therein. Non - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties provided 6. Public right -uf -way improvement work required shall be constructed in confo- .aanco with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and standard Drawings and any special amendments tholeto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or other r: inc.dontal work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. " 0 7. Work done within existing streets 811411 be diligently pursued to completions the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shill be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. '- 9. The Developer shall be reoponsible for removal of all loose rock end other debris from the public right -of -way resulting from work done on the adjacent property or within said right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall plant and maintain park- -way trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guarantee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. Tt.e principal amount of said - ' improvement security uhall be not less than the amount shown below: II4PROVEMENT SECURITY SUBMITTED: . Faithful Performance Bond $16.000.00 Material and Labor Bond S 8,000.00 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities !' required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures: .� DEVELOPER r' iF BY: DATE: • 9Y: / J/ DATE:- WITNESS: DATE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ' a municipal corporation 1 F BY: , MAYOR 1 ' ATTEST: , CITY CLERL DATE:_ ` 1%_a FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND LOS- 070286 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, State O Of California, and Gary D. Bougher, Gerald T. Broyles S Margaret A. Boughs (hereinafter designate as prrncipa a:e enters nto an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and - .plate certain designated Public improvements, which said agreement, dated r 198 -, and identified as project Im :ovements at 8270 Foothill Blvd . arso an , rs ere y re erre to an made a part WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance Of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and Balboa Insurance Co. . un unto e C ty o Rant o Cucamongaa (hereinafterecalledanCit rmly in the penal soma of Sixteen thousani and 00/100 -- - -- - - -�� -- DO era �aw u money o e Unite states, a payment o w c awe we sad truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and admini- strators, jointly and severally, firmly by therms presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors Or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well n truly keep fs O•.'asions• inthesa dareemntananylration thereof made as therein and provided, or e manner therein specified, and pIna all prespects accordingmto their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation .shall become null and void] otherwise, it shall be and remain in full force and affect. As a face amountaspecifiedd therefor, there shall be�,includedaCosts and the reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. Of time. alteration or and Ofatheoagreemmenteoretpion the work to be performed thereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notlea of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or to the specifications IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and surety above named, on Aar_1 13 , 1982. LOS- 070286 LABOR AND NATERIALMEN BOND .WHEREAS, the City Coun it of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State Of California, and z,L (' ,r l,D i aar M�t6,tul,/, /.irtae(s (hereinafter designated e� prin- cipa�' ave entere'(FU an agreement whereby principal agrees to install and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, datedF 198 , I and identified as project Improvements at 8270 oathftl Bivd.- hereof; and, is y referred a to an m c a part WHEREAS, under the terms of said agreement, principal is required before entering upon the performance of the work, to file a good and sufficient payment bond with the City of Rancho Cucamonga to secure the claims to which reference is mode in Title 15 (commencing with Section 3082) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code of the State of California% NOW, THEREFORE, said principal and the undersigned as a corporate surety, are held firmly bound unto the City of Rancho Cucamonga and all contractors, subcon_ractors, laborers, materialmen and other persons employed in the performance of the aforesaid agreement and referred to in the aforesaid Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of Fight thnimand And ______________________ _________— ----- .________ -._.._ - ------------------ - - - - -- ara Z8 0 0 , or mater als urM or a r thereon of any kind, or o-'for a=unts due under the Unemployment Insurance Act with respect to such work or labor, that said surety will pay tLe same in an amount not exceeding the amount . hereinabove set forth, and also in case suit is brought upon this % ad will pay in addition to the face amount thereof, costs and reasona. -e expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the court, and to be taxed as costs and to be included in the Judgment therein rendered. It is hereby expressly stipulated and agreed that this bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to file claims under Title 15 (commencing with Section 3002) of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, so As to give a right of a•tion to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond. Should the condition of this bond be fully performed, then tnis obligation shall become null and void, otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension Of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said agreement or the specifications accompanying the some shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the principal and surety above named, on Anril 13 1982. t; IV M a .. cITY or mxcuo ct:cAvosct CONSTRUCTION IL" BOND ESII)tATS EYCROACIZMNT PEEWT FEE SCHEDULE (.lttach to "Inspector's Copy ") DATE: 3/a/82 PERMIT NO. caaUM BT J. Store, Jr. File Reference N/S Foothill Blvd. City D awing No.e Westerly o an ernardino Rb. NOTC; Does not include current fee for writing permit or pavement replace- ment deposits. CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMTE • CONSTRUCTI ^N COST 313,70335 • c CCNTINCR;CY CO5T5 S 2.29b.65 . TOTAL CONSTRUCTION CODTS 116.000.00 FAITHFUL PIRPORNANCE BOND (100X) LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (5OX) s e J i� 4_ ,9-: ; fell , DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May S.-T982 City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Cha�ae of Street Nave From Center Avenue to Ivy Lane in Tra t 9 5 it has been brought to Staff's attention that Tract 9458 and Tract 9480 were both recorded with *Center Avenue' as a north /south street extending south of Base Line to Palo Alto Street. These two streets are parallel and within 200 feet of each other. This error was discovered during construction and the easterly street was renamed to Ivy Lane and Posted as such. Tract Map 9458, however, was never amended to reflect the change. This has resulted in certain confusion with Ue County Assessor's records that requires correction. Attached for Council action is a Resolution ordering Tract Map 9458 to be amended to reflect the fact that *Center Avenue• has changed to •Ivy Lane-. Because street names and home addresses currently reflect this change residents in the area will not ba affected. RECOMMENOATIOH: It is recorsnanded that City Council adopt the attached Resolution changing the name of Center Avenue of Tract 9458 to Ivy Lane. Respectfully submitted, * Attachments gg4, y3W- ,fi+ 1 a F r; i. n. }5, kpt l{ R n s 0 9 CITY OF RANCHO cc,lo,,,,rA title �� ENGINEERING DIVISION ' �.,�n r, SIP VICINITY NIAP N.- t° ■ $" RESOLUTION NO. t► A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF + RANCHO CUCA 47NOA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE NAME OF CENTEP AVENUE WITHIN TRACT NO. 9458 r IVY + LANE " WHEREAS, it has been found that a certain street name has been used, which conflicts With street names chat tre not in the same alignment; and WHEREAS, eaergercy services personnel need to be able to determine street locations without hesitation. f NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby designate 'Center Avenue' within Tract No. 9458, south of Base Line Road, to be henceforth known as *Ivy " Lane• BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be directed to _ fomrd a copy of this r_sclution to the Board of Supervisors, Courty of 4• San Bernardino as set fo -t;n in Section c4092 of the Government Code, of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of May, 1982 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon D. Hikels. or ATTEST: Lauren N. 4ssserman, City Clerk i A M "1! r e+ a r Y i t x 6 i f t D 4 — C"rY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: may S'-M2 TO: City Council and City Nanager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubs, City Engireer SUBJECT: r.ertCnL Aoreermnt with City of Ontario Attached for Council ey9tCuticn is an Easement an cement with the h Ly of Ontario. This agreement covers the dedication of right of way along 100 feat of frontage on Hillikgn Aveaae This dedication is required to complete improvements for Assessment District 82 -1. The IubJecL property 1s a well site owned by the City of Ontario but located within the boundaries of Rancho Cucamonga. The a5reement crovides that the Assessment District construct street improvements ala rawro the well sit+ to its original condition after construction. The agreement becomes void in the event assessments aeo not confirmed. RECOMDENDATION: It is recommended that the Council approve the Easement Agreement with the City of Ontario covering dedication of rights of way at Well Site 4o. 23 and authorize the ft-or and City Clert to e.:ecuce the documents. Respectfully submitted, LBH:bc Attachments Y 1 • 1f V 6 EASFMENT AGREEMENT rriS AGP.EEMENT is made and entered Into this o day of Q -� t9? by and betwe <n the CITY OF ONTARIO, a Municipal Corporation and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHOHGA. a Municipal Corporation RECITALS WHEREAS, the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA has foreed an assessment district for the improvement of some streets and storm drain factliles; and a WHEREAS, the acquisition of certain easements is necessary for public ioprowacnts for the assessment district; and WHEREAS, said public improvements are planned and located to a manner which is compatible Kith th, reatest public good and the least private injury; and WHEREAS, the CITY OF ONTARIO and the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA are desirous at this time to agree as to the tems of acquisition of the easement to be a� `�. conveyed. E` HOW, THEVI.ORE, IT iS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED BY THE PARTIES HERETO, AS I� ■e` NEEN 11 ly RECITALS I. The CITY CF ONTARIO shall grant to the CITY OF RANCHO CUCANON-.,A an easement for Road and Public Utility Pur9 as over the East 30.00 feet of the North 100.00 feet of ,luck l in Tract Number 2244, in the City of Rancho Cucamenge of San Bernardino. State of California, as par map recorded in Book 35. Pages 50 to 56 inclusive of Maps, in the office of the County Recnrder of said County (known 33 well site 20). 2. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONOA shall in exchange for said easement do the following on CITY OF ONTARIO property: r t (a) Install concrete curb and gutter (h) Pa.eout to concrete gutter with AC pavement l (c) Provide cne concrete drive 16.00 feet in width the centerline to line up with the center of the existing well shaft w;7 Ya (d) Regrade and repave a pertlon or the existing parking area Westerly of tale new rigut -of -way line. •:i Y1 Iry .r..., R Easement Agreement (Continued) (e) Reset the existing fence posts back to the new right -of -way line. All of the 2bove work is shown on the sketch attached hereto and made a part hereof and identified as 'Exhibit A'. 3. no CiTY OF ONTARIO hereby grants to the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, its authorized agent or contractor, a temporary right-to -enter for the purpose of doing the wori: set forth as Item 2d and 2e above 4. This Agrearer.t and the terms and conditions contained herein are all subject to a successful confirmation of the assessment, award of the construction contract and the sale of the bonds. 5 The CITY OF RAVICHO CUCAMONGA shall not record the easement deed accompanying this agreement until after the confirmation of the assessment. 6. In the event the assessment is mot confirmed the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA shall return the easement deed to the CITY OF OIITARIO. 7. The partial hereto have set forth the whole of their agreement and wdrrant that there are no oral or written cmrunications other than the tarms contained herein. IN WITNESS, the parties have executed this agreement as of this day first above written. Approvedras to F rm;r By. �% /MAR 51982 d RECOROOa REWMED by City of Rancho Cucamonpt WHEN RECORDED MALTO City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 I SPACE Alan TNO LMa FOR RECORDERS Dan EASEMENT . FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, recdpt of which b hereby acknowledged. CITY OF ONTARIO a Municipal_COlpnratinn • 0 GRANT(S) to the Qty of Rancho Cuc=onp, a Municipal Corporation, as EASEMENT for Road and Public Utility Purposes In, ore - and upon that certain real property in the City of kancbo CLamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of CaUfornia. Described as Follows: f The Easterly 30.00 feet r' the North 100.00 feet of Lot I in Block 13 of Tract Number 2244 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 35, pages 50 to 56 inclusive at Naps in the office of the County Recorder of said County. APP�0-0 fS TO FO2A : A1AR 1 1112 ttrr x.-t.r .) r.10 cut=cueo CITY OF ONTARIO rnA r Dated , / 'J G. /9Y 2 B tart :� Mayo `tom' OL City Clark 1 -_-v J m w N.T.S. BLOCK PUMP House s C.L. PENCE SITE NO. SO WA maw E/W PKOvOS[O ,RELOCATE PENCE POI TE TO NEW R/W `f [MULLDMEM AVM MUS CITY OF ONTARIO WELL SITE NO. 20 A.P� 210 - 082 -14 , I — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ¢¢ STAFF REPORT + :��.• DATE: May 5, 1982 T0: City Council and City Manager tsn FROM: Lloyd B. Mubbs, City Engineer 4 :V SUBJECT Llcensr. Agreement with Santa Fe Railroad Attached for Council approval and execution are two license agreements with the Santa Fe Railroad covering construction of six storm drain crossings in con - Junction with Assessment District 82 -1. The licenses are standard railroad agreements which make the City responsible for proper construction and main - tenance within railroad rights of way for the duration of the structures. The license and contract specification will transmit the construction liability a to the Main- tenance facilit es will i the specified remainn aCity responsibilitty'reaents. The agreement also involves payment of $500 in license fees and additional _ inspection costs. These costs will be borne by the Assessment District. These license documents should be executed and fee's paid prior to advertisement of the District to allow inclusion in the specifications. E RECOMMENDA'10N-. it is recommended that Council approve execution of Pipeline Licenses Number ON- 70123 -25 and authorize the Mayor to sign documents. It is also recommended that Council authorize payment of $500 license fees free Storm Drain Fees on loan to Assessment District 82 -1. ± Respectfully submitted, - or h. ;A t LBN:bc Attachments } A�. M a3 t r I t a c w' s• r�• I ® The Atebi seatTelaka and Santa [eRaHWAYCOMPaNY' A SW, to avwsrt rbgrp ow er r•r,aatas W ar twa•. •.r.e� tYaw rr 217/267 -5219 March 19, 1982 pilot SH- 70125 -25 Williamson g Schmid Conculting Civil Engineers 4 Land Surveyors 17782 Sky Park Blvd. Irvine, CA 92714 Attn: Mr. Nike Tajik RE: Rancho Cucamonga Assesrment District 97 -1 Job No. 80257 Gentleman: Please refer to your letter of September 15, 1981, and subsequent correspondence. gnelosed are duplicate copies of two separate License Agreements, covering proposed installation of ■torn drain crossings at or near our Stations of Rochester and Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino. Specifications appear satisfactory. Installation my be open -cut under 'Track No. 2, providing 7000 -D pipe is used at location identified as OPP. C.S. 740 04.S (future track) on C.E.C.L. Drawing No. 20- 41205. Please have all copies of the Agretments executed by an official authorized by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to do so, and furnish evidence of authority for the signatory to sign on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All copies of the Agreements should be returned to the undersigned, together with a check in the amount of $500 0250 for each License), as required by the Agreements. Signed copies of the Agreements will be returned for your records. Also, enclosed are three (7) sets of long -form Cave KSMI12a Agreement and Surety Bond form, vich instructions for completing the Agreements and securing proper insurance to comply uith Sections 18 and 19 of the License Agreements. It- Ilk �1 r Williamson i Schmid March 19, 1982 Pile: BR- 70123 -25 Page 2 Please have the contractor return the Agraesants to this office, in duplicate, along with the original Railroad Protective Policy and certificate, evidencing contractor's liability insurance. If there are any questions, you say contact A. E. Correa, of my office, of the above telephone number. Vary truly yours, R. D. Pish, Central Manager By P. 'tine - Manager of C15Acts cc: City of Rancho Cucamonga P. o. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager 0 14 5401A Fe Or;ginal BN- 70127 -25 PIPELINE LICENSE THIS LICENSE, Made this 18th day of February 1982, between SHE ATCHISON, SOPEYA AND SAND R IAnMAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation (hereinafter called "Licensor "), party of the first part, and CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONCA, a municipality in the State of California (hereinafter, whether one or more, called "Licensee "), party of the second part. YISNESSETH, That the parties hereto for the considerations hereinafter expressed covenant and agree as follows: 1. Subject to the fares and conditions hereinafter sat forth, Licensor licensee Licensee to construct and maintain three (I) pipelines, 48 and 60 inches in diameter (hereinafter, whether one or more pipelines, called the "PIPELINE "). across or along the right of way of Licensor at or near the Station of Rochester. County of San Bernardino State of California, the exact location of the PIPELINE being-more particularly shown upon the print berate, attached, No. 20- 41205, dated January 28, 1982, marked "Exhibit A" and made a part hereof, , 2. Licensee shall use the PIPELINE solely for carrying store run -off water and shall • not use it to carry any other commodity or for any other purpose whatsoever. D. Licensee shall pay Licensor as compensation for 'is License the sum of Two Hundred Fifty and No /100 Dollars (1250.00). 4. Licensee shall, at its own cost and subject to the supervision and control of Licensor's AS.'•tanr General Manager- Engineering, locate, construct and maintain the PIPELINE in suc`: a +anner and of such material that it will not at any time be s F source of danger to or interference with the present or future tracks, roadbed and property of Licensor, or the safe operation of its railroad. In cases where the Licensee is permitted under Section 2 hereof to use the PIPELINE for oil, ass, patrols= products, or other flammable or hi hl volatile substances under pressure. the PIPELINE shall be constructed, installed and thnraaEter maintained in conformity with the plans and specifications sbown on print hereto attached -a such taus, marked "Exhibit B" and made a part hereof. If at any time Licenses shall, in the judgment of Licensor, fail to perform properly its obligations under this Section, Licensor may, at its option, itself perform such work as it deems necessary for tl•e safe operation of its railroad, and in such event Licensee agrees to pay, within fifteen (15) days after bill shall have been rendered therefor, the cost so tw.urred by Licensor, but failure on the part of Licensor to perform the obligations of Licensee shall not release Licensee from liability hereunder for loss or damage occasioued thereby. 5. Licensee shall reimburse Licensor for any expense incurred by Licensor for falsework w to support Licensor's tracks and for flagman to protect its traffic during installation of the PIPELINE and for any and all other expense incurred by Licensor a, O on account of the PIPELINE, _Rev. 10 /81 (1658M91) ri 6. Licensee shall at all time indemnify and save harmless Licensor against and pay in full all loss, damage or expense that Licensor may sustains incur or become IiaDla for, resulting in any manor from the construction, maintenance, use, state of repair, or presence of the PIPELINE, including any such loss, damage or aspens* arising out of (a) lrss of or damage to property, (b) injury to or death of persons, (c) mecbsnics or other liens of any ebarac ter, or (d) taxes or aasessmat• of any kind. 7. If at any rime Licensee shall fall or refuse to comply with or terry out any of the covenants herein contained Licensor may at its election forthwith revoke this License. 8. THIS LICENSE is given by Licensor and accepted by Licensee upon the express condition ma thet the say be teminated at any time by either party upon ten (10) days noti same my in writing to be served upon the other party, stating therein the date that such termination shall take place, and that upon the lamination of this License in this or any other manner herein provided, Licensee, upon demand of Licensor, stall abandon the use of the PIPELINE and remove the same and rasters the rich- of way and tracks of Licensor to the same condition in which they wen prior to the placing of the PIPELINE thereunder. In case Licensee shall fail to nature Licensor'■ premises as aforesaid within ten (10) days after the effective date of termination. Licensor may proceed with such work at the expense of Licensee. No termination hereof shall release Licensee from any liability or obligation hereunder, wnether of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any acts, omissions or events happening prior to the date the PIPELINE is removed and the right of way and • track of Licensor restored as above provided. 9. In the case of the eviction of Licensee by anyone owning or obtaining title to the premises on which the PIPELINE is located, or the sale or abandonment by Licensor of said premises, Licensor shall not be liable to Licensee for any damage of any nature whatsoever or to refund any payment made by Licensee to Licensor hereunder, except the proportionate part of any recurring rental charge which may have been paid hereunder in Advance. 10. All notices to be given hereunder shall be given in writing, by depositing same in the United States mail duly - egistered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the Licensee or Licensor as the cue may be at the address show on the signature page hereof, or addressed to such other address as be parties hereto may from time to time designate. 11. In the event that two or more parties execute this Instrument as Licensee, all the eovanarts and agreements of Licensee in this License shall be the joint and several covenants and agreements of such parties. 12. All the covenants and provisions of this Instrument shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors, legal representatives and assigns of the parties to the asma extent and effect as the same are binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, but no assigameot hereof by Licensee, its successors, legal representatives or assigns, or any subsequent assignee, shall be binding upon Licensor without the written consent of Licensor in each instance. •° z Rev. 10 /81 (1658/H91) _2_ 4 0 13. Notwithstanding any othar provisions of this Licease, Licensee shall comply with all statute*, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders and decisions (hereinafter referred to as "Standards ")e issued by any federate state or local goverrmental body or agency established thereby (hereinafter referred to as "Authority "). relating to Licensee's use of Licensoe's property hereunder. In its use of the premises. Licensee shall at all times be in full compliance with all Standards, present or future, net by any Authority, including, but not limited to, Standards concerning air quality, water quality, noise, harardoub "baronets and batardous waste. In the event Licensee fails to be in full compliance with Standards sst by any Authority, Licensor may, after giving reasonable notice of the failure to Licensee, and Licensee, within thirty 00) days of such notice, fails either to correct such noncompliance or to give written notice to the Licensor of its intent to contest the allegation of noncompliance before the Authority establishing the Stallard or in Any other proper form. take whatever action is necessary to protect the Promises and Licensor'• railroad and other adjacent property. Licensee shall reimburse the Licensor for all costs (including but not limited to, consulting, engineering, clean -up and disposal coats, and legal costs) incurred by the Licensor in complying with such Standards, and also such costs incurred by the Licensor in abatint, a violation of such Standards, protecting against ■ threatened violation of such Standards, defending any claim of violation of such Standards in any proceeding before any Authority or court, and paying any fines or penalties imposed for such violations. Licensee shall assume liability for end shall save and hold harmless the Licensor from any claim of a violation of such Standards regardless of the nature thereof or the Authority or person sasereing such claim, which results from • Licensee's use of Licensor'• premises, whether such claim arises in whole or in part from the negligence or alleged negligence of the Licensor or otherwise. Licensee, at its cost, shall assume the defense of all such claims regardless of whether they are asserted against Licensee or Licensor. Upon written notice from Licensor, Licensee agrees to assume the defense of any lawsuit, administrative action or other proceeding brought against Licensor by any pubaic body, individual, partnership, corporation, or other legal entity, relating to any ratter covered by this License for which Licensee has an obligation to 'assume liability for and /or to save and hold harmless the Licensor. Licensee shall pay all the costa incident to such defense, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees, investigators' fees. litigation expenses, settlement payments, and amounts paid in satisfaction of judgments. Any and all lawsuits or administrative actions brought or threatened on any theory of relief available at law, in equity or under the rules of any administrative agency shall be covered by this Section, including, but not limited to, :he theories of intentional misconduct, negligence, breach of statute or ordinance, or upon any theory created by statute or ordinance, state or federal. 14. In cases where Licensee is permitted under Section I hereof to use the PI:2LINE for nonflammable substances, the PIPELDM shall be constructed, installed and thereafter maintained in conformity with plans and specifications set forth in the American Railway Engineering Aasoci.,tion, Specification for Pipeline Crossings Under Railway Track for Nan- rlaccuble Substances, Revised 1964, or Specifice:fon for the Placement of Concrete Culvert Pipe, Revised 1966, whichever may apply. 15. Any work performed on Licensoe's right of way by License.. or Licensee's contractor shall be done in a aatesfactory workmanlike manner and in accordance with plans and Rev. 10181 (1658/X91) -3- spec if it8lions approved_by Licensor, including plans covering say falsavork, bracing or cribbing that may be necessary to use over, under or adjacent to Licenser's track, and no work Shall be pa=Ltted until said plans and specifications have been approved by Licensor. 16. Licensee or Licensee's contractor shall not be permitted to commence work on aid Licensor'• fight of way without hsvieg first received written notification from Licensoe's Division Superintendent of parmiesion to proceed. 17. Any contractor or subcontrector performing work on or in connection with the PIPELINE shall for tle purpose of this Agreement, and particularly for the purpr of Section 6 of this Agreement, be conclusively deemed to be the servant and r of Licensee acting on Lehalf and within the scope of such contractor's or subcontractor's employment for Licensee. I8. Licensee agrees to furnish and keep in force a, arrange to have furnished and ket in fares insurance of all kinds and amounts yecified bales during the initial to.. Of construction of the PIPELINE and during any subsequent tam or tame during which maintenance is perfomed on the PIPELINE. (a) Licensee shall, with respect to the operations which it perfcras upon, bangath or adjacent to Licenser's right of way and /at track, furnish or arrange to have furnished (i) regular Contractors' Pubtie Liability Insurance with limits of net less than Five Hundred Thousand De.11ars ($500,000) for all liability arising out of bodily injuries to or death of one person and, subject to that limit for each person, One Million Dollars ($1,000.000) for all liability • arising out of bodily injuries to or death Of two or mare persona in one acc.dent or occurrence; and (ii) regular Contractors' Property Damage Liability Insurance with limits of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for each Occurrence for all liability Origin& out of damage to or loss or destruction of property. Licensee and all its coctractors and subcontractors shell be named insureds either in a single policy of insurance complying vit% the requirements of this Subsection (a) or in separate policies maintained during such periods as such contractors and /or subcontractors shall perform any work hereunder. The policy or policies )insuring Licensee shall insure Licensee's contractual liability in favor of Licensor contained in Section 6 of this License (b, Licensee shall, with respect to the operations it or any of its contractor, or subcontractor, perform upon, beneath or adjacent cc Licenaor's fight of way and /or track, furnish or arrange to have furnished in Licensor'. mavor (i) policy or policies of insurance satisfactory to Licensor which ,hall protect Licensor against liability for injuries to or death of person or persons, INCLUDING LICENSOB'S EMPLOYES, Occasioned by or resulting, in whom or in part, from the operations of Licensee or any of its subcontractor,, on or contiguous ra Licensoe's property (except liability due solely to Licensor'• negligence), s.ith limit, of not lea than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) for ell de, ,I• arising out of bodily injuries to or death of one person and, subject to .uch limitation, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) for all damages arising out of bodily injuries to or death of two or more persons in any one accident or occurrence; and (ti) policy or policies of insurance Satisfactory to Rev. 10/81 (1658 /M91) -6_ 9 Licensor which will protect Licensor against liability foe damage to or loss or destruction of property, including property in Licensor's care, custody or control, occasioned by or resulting, in wholes or in part, from the operstiocs of Licenses, its contrarturs or subcontterto a (axca7t liability due solely to Licensor's negligence) with limits of not less than One Million Dollars k' (11,000,000) for each occurrence. 19. Licenser agrees to furnish or arrange to have fcroisbad to Licensor certifiestus "fleeting the insurance coverage or certified copy of insurance policy, if t req °jested by Licensor, as required by subsection (a) of Section 18 hereof, and to furnish, or arrange to have furnished, the original policy required by subsectior (b) of Section 16. Certificates reflecting the coverage required by subsection (a) shall unqualifiedly require thirty (30) days' written notice to Licensor of cancellation or modification of the insurance referred to in such certificates. ` 20. L. •ee shall not be permitted to exercise the license and pereiuicn granted i` heraunee •ntil notified by Licensor that insurance furnished pursuant to Section 18 'y hereof is satisfactory. :. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this License, in duplicate, the day and f year first above written. APPROVED AS 7O FORM • � �- THE ATCHISON, 'OPERA AND SACRA FE W.11HAY COMPANY /. 'j � ee One Santa Plata f 3200 6. Sheiof la Ctreat Asns -. jIt C.sn:rsl AltWnrj Los Angeles. CA 90040 BY '4261ItR .Rev. 10181 (1658/H91) Its CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONCA P. 0. Boy 80• Rancho Cucsxongs, CA 91730 X 8y Its License• N f. ° -� RESOLUTION N0. 82 -23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPOINTING OFFICERS AND AGENTS TO ACCEPT DEEDS ON BMLF OF THE CITY. (superceding Res. No. 78 -36) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, Government Code Section 27281 provides that: 1. Deeds or grants conveying any Interest in or easement upon real estate to a political corporation or governmental agency for public purposes shall not be accepted for reeordatlon without the consent of the grantee evidenced by its certificate or resolution of acceptance attached to or printed on the - deed or grant. 2. A political corporation or governmental agency, by a general resolution, may authorize an officer or agent to accept and consent to :uch deeds or grants; S AND, WHEREAS, for the benefits to be derived through expenditious to authorize officers, andnIn hisaabsence* an agent to accept ianndnconsestrtole certain deeds or grants obtained. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City o• Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to Goverment Code Section '7281, that the fellowtng officers and agents: The City Clerk and the Deputy City Clerk The City Engineer and the Associate Civil Engl,:eer are authorized to accept ano consent to deeds and grants to the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 0 1. Gratis deeds and grants including Offers of Dedication. 2. Deeds and grants previously approved for purchase by official action of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Sth day of May, 1982. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: •n D. Mikels. Mayor ATTEST: 31 7 Me4 27280 COU.yTtE$— OPflCSR9 Title 2 j u .nailed C1-Luu laar, n e7. W rr. ICea Cray •. neo (19001 m C. 21211. YNer Ymt salemt rY tie IYa th*=w 13 C. awl. M.w a 27280.5 Nemn of paritm Idit1l[ eel to be ladezN .S.q wef i ' 7be names of Partin icvdred to be indexed appearing in any In. : i Atmmen4 Paper, or notice Presented for recordation shall be legibly u. On 2104 typed, or printed therein before acceptance by the county re, cola 1 t 'Order. The nano of all persons CUCUling or witnessing a dote. t4 off meat ahall be iegibly signed Or shall be typed or printed to the side 'n• i of or below the signature. the abwm or rlcgiect to legibly sign, type, W ag or print the names sh trot affect the notice otherwise Imported by rceardlrig, (Added Statsl%7, a 56. P. 957,11) ateml The tnrary RefYOSe Y Ymt.eM'.. i1IMMa fax ass aemata l 11L tMastl+«. 27281. Deeds for public purposes; cerUOeate or resolution at t acaptana; loan a .artifimte Deeds or grants comaying any Interest In or easement upon real t{I estate to a Political corporation or gmet, =W agency for Public t. t. t Purposes shall not be accepted for tcr=&Uan without the oenunt of r+n, the 9=teo evidenced by Its cerUllcote or resolution of acceptance at. d t. r taehed to or Printed on the deed or r grant if a eortill: o. acceptance M'dr r Is UsK It shag be to substan dally the following form: i dA TMs Is to certify that the Interest in real property conveyed by the _ y � deed or grant dated ..... from . to .. a Political corpo. ration and/or gosernvlentsl Agency Is hereby accepted by older of the• ••••... .. on ... ., (orbythaundmtgnedofficeroragent tM sad» fdW) boot Eka i on rho ..... .... pursuant to authority conferred by °•• didlau resolution of the . adopted on .. .... ) and the grantm "• t'ixolr I IleraLlln 1 (4M consents to recarda nitlert»tt Its duly -. cot, : authorked officer. Dated . Apolitical corporoom or gmeramental aMCM by a genera(reso. 27 iuUOn4 may autbarize an officer or agent to accept uld cw=t to such deeds or grants (Added Stats1947, a 429. n 1159. 12, as ■mended 1. Ststs1957, a $69, p. 20.42„ 1 l; Stats.1959, a 433. p 2374 11.) � edvw r Hiltarleel Rot. Ace erfeelar emceed tW Yobs t•td nllai ee,rantba . twerOmaUl .env V •f n" • MIY'.f "I IatfTl Ge "M MN u.a nY M u tG ty, au the to Vm eeol Ye.ls N e P' t.r rwv,d.am rr.lht la. muvt et ter. t 26 l i' v �- it 0` 3 ggti�� ent by Dir. 2 DOCVUEATR TO Ds RECORDED $ 27282 real n Rb b Ib tm.btice d a • uwbtls uWrldlo eepd.fsst d u mben uttereS& d b Ihe dted .r :rreG etmvrmustbhnea�rddaedd. A gall! mr,ers m urt WHO b • rmtrd led 0 iq w s.bd e .mere l rest a inner b rpm AINr rt (nHL J W: not the emednd repent d the trot a tar h ceek.. Mice tst mnu m . writ "Llcred 4 the wr1W. saw meem d emwdl.a or umbumul lo In W .1beer u lout smith" Is the dad P redeat�. tc*A a u tr" bntbv • t" d, d even" bit the m..bUS aelurelei utCMy eDce for W .Nm W hen .now br terer4. W ett1 m loot- U. dedlo the verve tree• But ®br 1L A= b the ddo heat". b b.ra aL. ]7af resident teerob up eta .unit. by weep" u bd.r a dpommt mntN dee. b rme"aUm vinwed Wt eMi o.rb The = ersrout he the rent M. dred m act . to ether m ft a& tmm iW.M Ye ft hetim, -.d n the mdteY. In twerdalm. AMi eeth dud rased entree Ienrred 9t 0 he on d •- mat OAt W hem m ree:rad d.,Mr W dbartd- U.AtL- earl Vnied n.n beet ed stele be them the On, C ihe ILC7 WfYemt :•m lutrtd W reen atim perk. d He m.Mb n .e1. Kmtbord au.dd IS m, beer d the neemt tnaheaan .ad s ®bmeats- nend fnq rat tkt hb&A U.&, Daewmst 11a* W dd.t" the tertetr mWWl. m net..tl reeetd. atom" rem/ p` Cl rend" b 6br = . 1 1.43.3, Ltbr.rr Iblme , add Re& l m Not" of outdoes t. le Pearl d r'eTat rd rttp d bad ru .na- arear. Loren@, BUM 1. dC Oty of kmis. (l=) n I. Wt b mnmb sera" eel et tent reJr .hYb dU rmdrd Uddmd., tale Ent met let dtr b .e vt Menee.e § 27282. Doeumemts reeortiabio ttithoul seknm. ted6mteot; eon - uch dtruetiro notico dell (a) The foDmvinQ documents may be twordcd vlthmt oduawl- tdVnrnt, wrUneate of mekoowkd},mtm:t, or Rtrther Proof: (1) A ludgnent offecting Ua UUo to or Ibtatesslon of reel PtoP'a` ty. outheettatted by the corUfkato of the clerk of the court In reach wed the ludemcnt bras rendered. eve 27 W 7/44 =.L ORDINANCE NO. /4V Ail ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COOtICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, REZONI ' SESSOR' NIRiBER <, 201- 252 -32 FROM R -1- 10,000 R P.O. F 6. ORES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE MORi DE OF HIG D, EAST OF ARCHIBALD i The City Council of the City of Ranc Cucamonga, California, does ordain as fcllows: ^• SECTiOII 1: The City Cwncil hereby finds and determines the ` following• A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, considered rezoning of the property hereinafter described B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plai of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. _ C This rezoning will have no significant environoentai impact As provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The following described rest property is hereby rezoned in the manner stated, and the zoning map is hereby amended a:cordingly.� Assessor's Parcel Number 201 -252 -32 Prom R -1 -1 Single- FAmiIy on 10.0026 UAre .foot lots) to P.D lo the north side of Highland, east of Archibald, on 6 SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shat caT— use the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dail Report, a newspaper of ger•ral circ•ilation published in th�f In moo, California, and circulated in the Cit, of Rancho Cucamonga, California PASSED, APPROVED, nd P.00PTED this AYES HOES ABSENT 'r `J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE may S. 1982 TD: Members of the City Cotmcil FROti: Jack Lem, AtCP, Director of Community Developeeri' Pv Da,, Coleman, associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 81-02 TENTATIVE TRACT 11915 - MAYER - A change of zone from (Single family s ent a to R -3 /1'D (Multiple Family Residential /Planned Development) in conjunction with the develiw. -it of 44 patio homes and 322 townhouse writs an a 35 acre parcel located on the south side of Arrd, between Turner and Center Aven es - APR 909- 091 -05, 06, 31. SiR4^WRY: The proposal before the Council Is for a total Planned ve opment oe 44 patio homes and 322 townhouse units on s acres of land in order to approve the proposal, City Council will need to approve the Zone Change from R -1 to R -3 /PD and to issue a Nega- tive Declaration. The Planning Comsission, at its meeting of torch 10, 1982, held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the above described project and approved the related Tract Map with Conditions s. attached end recommended approval of the Negative Declara.ion and change of zone. Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Staff Report. which fully describes the project. The project as proposed is con - sistent with all related City Ordinances and pl_ns. The proposed density of 10 8 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the Reneral Plan and Use designation of Medimn Density Residential (4 -14 dwelling units Per acre). No adverse environmental Impacts are antiCiDated as a result of this project. Ths oevelnper has been working on the design of this project with the Citizen Particloation Committee who represents the North ;own reridents The design is intended to provide greater housing oppor- tunities for Vils area. The developers have designed a section of the Project as detached single family patio homes to blend with the exiting har_.s within the North Town area. 0 v Planned Oev4T6pment'01- 02 /Hnyer City Council Agenda May S. 1982 Page 2 _ n CORRESPONDENCE: There was no public opposition voiced at the Planning Commission pub Ic hearing. This item was advertised as a Wblic hearing and notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the pro- ject. REMMNOAT104: The Planning Comuission recormends that the City Council approve Planned Development 91-0? for the above describes project through adoption of the attached Ordinance. R gKin y subcttted. tr D irector of Coammity Development JC:DC jr _ Attachments: Planning Comnission Staff Report and Resolution of Approval City Council Ordinance tKtt rrt �I 6 r it ORDINANCE N0. 175 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL nc THE CITY OF WICHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONIffa ASSbZOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 209. 091 -05. 06, 07, LOCATED ON THE SOUP4 SIDE OF ARROW. BETWEEN TURNER AND CENTER AVENUES FROM R -1 TO R•3 /P.D. The City Council o' tIM City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, doas ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Ccuncll hereby finds and determines the following A. That the Planning Commission of the City of R-r 10 Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the rezoning of the pprcperty hereinafter described, and this City Council has hold a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law as duly heard and considered said retonm:endation. B. That this rezoning is consistent with the General Plan of the C ty of Rancho Cucamonga C This rezonirg will have no significant enviromental impact as prmided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 2: The followi,l described real property .s hereby rezoned in a manner stated. and the zoning map is hereby amended accordingly Assessors Parcel humbers 209 - 091 -05, 06, 01, approximately 35 acres in size and generally located on the south side of Arrow, between Turner and Center Avenues, is hereby changed from R -I (Single Family Residence) to R -3 /P D (Multiple Family Residence /Planned Development) SECTION 3 The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the Cit, Clerk snail cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Dail Report, a newspaper of general circu'atton puo'ished in tho ty o ntar o, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califo,ia PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 10y, 1982 AYES. NOES: ABSENT, 3? I ■ 0 • CITY OF PWNCHO CUCAAkONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 10, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner 8Y: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 81 -02 - TT 11916) - MAYER - A zone change from R -1 (Single am y Res— ent a to R -3 /PO (Multiple Family Residential/ Planned Development) in conjunction with the development of 44 patio homes and 322 townhouse units on a 35 acre parcel located on the south side of Array, between Turner and Center Avenues - APR 209- 091 -05, 06, 07. - GARY: The Applicant is requesting review and approval of a Planned opment and associated Tentative Tract Map (Exhibit 'C "). The pre - will consist of 44 patio homes and 322 townhouse units on 8 '35 acre el located between Arrow and 26th Street and between Turner and er Avenues. The proposed project meets the General Plan and Zoning nance requirements and has passed the City's Growth Management and gn Review process. Therefore, the Planned Development (including change of zone), Tentative Tract Map, and issuance of a Negative aratlor, can be considered by the Planning Commission. BACKGROUND. This proposal consists of 366 units on 35 acres of land oce� C between Arrow and 26th, and between Turner and Center Avenues (Exhibit A) project siiaey vineyard. zoned R-1 (Single ily Residentl)and is designated or Medium Residential (4 -1t der -ll;ng units per acre) on the City's General Plan. The pr000�e� project density is 10.8 dwelling units per acre overall and is therefore consistent with the General Plan. Thb statistical summary on Sxhibit '0', Detailed Site Plan, provides a break down of the acres, density, and number of units within each planning area. The project site is bounded on the north by undeveloped land and a trucking opv- anon, an the east by the existing La Mancha Golf Course, on the soutn by existing single family residences and a church, and on the west by existing single family residences, undeveloped land and small market as shown on the attached Sitr Uti11c.'ion Map, Exhibit "8' ITEM 0 C C' PO 81 -02M 11915 Planning Commission Agenda . March 10, 1982 Page 2 This project has been reviewed and rated by the Design and Growth Management Review Committees in accordance with the Growth Hanage- went Ordinance. The project received a point rating in excess of the required threshold and is therefore eligible for Planning Com- mission review. In addition, the Conceptual Grading Plan has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and given conceptual aoproval. ANALYSIS: As noted above, the project would consist of 44 patio and 322 townhouse units as indicated on the Detailed Site Plan, Exhibit "O ". The units are arranged in clusters around common open space areas, parking pods, and recreational facilities as sham in Exhibit 'L ". The project site has been divided Into three planning areas; Area "A" consists of zero lot line patio homes of 1.230 to 1,403 square feet, Area '8" consists of two -story town- house units of 1,046 to 1,534 square feet, and Area "C" consists of 15., stacked townhouse units of 740 to 1,133 square feet. The elevations and floor plans are indicated on the attached Exhibits "I ". 'J ", and "K ". The parking provided meets the standard; of the Zoning Ordinance and adequate guest parking has been provided throughout the project • site. The patio homes have been designed with a variety of ecterior treat- ments and materials. All patio home units have been provided with an asphalt shingle roof. The two -story townhouse and stacked town- house units have been designed with a similar atchitectzral treatment and are designed with asphalt shingle roofs am stucco exteriors with wood fascia. The two -story townhouse units hava low profile stucco garden walls with a brick cap and the stacked townhouse units have low profile walls provided with horizontal wood siding. Each unit has been provided with ground floor patios or balconies in accordance with the Planned Development standards. In addition to private open spaces, recreational facilities have been provided through- out the project site. The patio home portion of the project has a common tot lot, with recreational opportunities available to each resident w'thin their enclosed rear yard. The townhouse portions of the project have been provided with recreational facilities in- cluding restraoms, spas, swimming pools, sunningy decks, and tot lots as shown on the Detailed ,Ite Plan (Exhibit 'D"). In addition, a continuous pedestrian circulation system meanders through common green- belt spaces. Two access points on either side of the Deer Creek Flood Channel will be available for residents desiring to use the future Regional Trail along Beer Creek Channel. 0 " llki `'• • 0 � c PO 81 -02M 11915 Planning Commission Agenda March 10, 1982 Page J Access to the project will be from access points along Arrow. Turner, 26th Street, and Center. Only one access point will be provided on Arrow Highway to reduce V.e need for left turn pockets and breaks in the future median island. In addition, emergency access points have been located on Center and Turner. Texturized paving crosswalks have been provided at appropriate locations to connect the interior pedes- trian circulation system. The Conceptual Landscape Plan, Exhibit "E ", of landscaping throughout the project. The recommended that special attention be given seeping around the perimeter particularly a located on Turner Street. The Committee al . be provided between garage doors on all tow be planted along perimeter walls and fences along the Deer Creek Flood Channel has been purposes The patio home portion of the on with a six -foot high decorative masonry wal' project will remain open to 26th, Center, Ai provides for an abundance Design Review Committee to providing dense land - ainst the two carports o recommended that trr -is house units and that vines A six -foot high fence provided for screening ject will be provided . The remainder of the row, and Turner. The Design Review Committee reviewed the building elevations and architectural design and recommended approval of the project. Staff and the Design Review Committee worked extensively revising the ele- vations as shown on Exhibits "I" and "K". Colored rendering% and elevations of these buildings will be available for review and com- ment at the Planning Commission meeting. Based upon the Grading Committee's recommendation, the Applicant has prepared a drainage and hydrology study that analyzes t a pro- posed method of drainage. Based upon this study, the project has been designed as per the Grading Committee's recommendation to drain into catch basins and storm drain pipes that connect with ,x4sting drainage outlets into the Deer Creek Channel at 26th Street. A minimum amount of surface water runo•, will be carried from portions of the private streets and project entrances into Turner Street A Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan and Hydrology Studies are shown on attached Exhibits "G" and "H ",resoectively. The Conceptual Grading Plan has been approved by the Grading Committee. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Atrached is Part 1 of the Initial Study as completed by the App cant. Staff has completed Part II of the initial Study and found that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect because the mitigation measures described in the Initial Study Part Ii have been added to the project. Therefore, ' Stiff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaratiun. .K PO 81 -02/1T 11915 Planning Commission Agenda March 10, 1982 Page 4 CORRESPOROENCE: A Notice of Public hearing was placed in The Dail Re_ o�rt newspaper. n addition, approximately 100 public hearing not cet s were mailed to surrounding property owners. Two residents from the surrounding neighborhood have contacted the Planning Division to express their concern with regard to a condominium project being located in a single family resi- dential area. C,TIZ PICIPAON ADVISORY CGIVITTEE: This project has been reviewed y the EN CP L ART on scTIvera occasions. 1he iatest design was presented to the Committee on February 18, 1982, at •filch time the Committee members ex- pressed three major concerns: I. The price range of the units. 2. Compatibility with adjacent single family residences. - 3. Public recreation soace. The Committee felt that this project exhibited high quality, however, expressed a desire to see units that North Town residents could afft Additionally, CPAC has repeatedly expressed its desire to see a pubs park site improved within the North Town area. The original project design two years ago included a 3 acre park site which was eliminated by the adoption of the General Plan that designated a park on the La Mancha Golf Course property. According to Bill Holley, Community Ser- vices Director, the park site indicated on the General Plan has been relocated to the center of North Town on the so:th side of Feron Boule- vard across from the Junior Nigh School. The CPAC recommends to the Planning Commission and City Council that park fees collected from this project be used to improve this park site. RK L EN T110N: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the pro pose anned Development and Tentative Map and conduct a public hearing to consider all public comments. If, after such review, the Commission cuncurs with the attached findings and proposed Conditions of Approval, a motion to adopt the attached Resolution of Approval of the Tentative Map and Resolution of Approval for the Zone Change would be appropriate. submitted, Attachments: (Listed on follcwing pane)) v Ci Planner y Attachments: (Listed on follcwing pane)) PD 81 -02M 11915 a• r• M, �3 List of Attachments: "A" - Location Nap "B" - Site Utilization Nap - Tentative Tract Nap "D" - Detailed Site Plan "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan "F" - Phasing Plan "G" - Conceptual Grading Plan "N" - Hydrolcgy Study "I" - Patio lime Elevations 6 Floor Plans "J -1 E J -2" - Townhouse Floor Plans "K -1 6 K -2" - Townhouse Elevations "L" - Cluster Concept "N" - Turner Streetscape "N" - Arrow Streetscape Study Part I - ons of Approval ns of Approval ' ,fir n n i � . . - J' - - ' Y lGv f ti �y:�Sf�- ,r{!•V A •I SVal 7� _ `� •'S(; F ;� ',•� w.... .,. TZ- ai � �•.l t (' U1 r,?C.�]{T!:fl��(il .D�ic��. � t� "f�� III + 4 '^i .•„ ^' "�f •siYr 1 ?;'... a n:, ll� j R- 7�lJ�f G t f 1 .' ] { {�(�"iL' :�+�yj�- r Rinll �•'r. �'! 1 � 'G :ll +' �!, �rf ��t� .� ' 1• �! �t . ! . r,. ;vlvn"Klnx ^ r 1G;{rS ; l T E .hYJ�: !f`, �Ktik f i? Y if 'Art rir. T h ; • J F 4 - ';: 11Ih�t.l'f 9�9 i'.••' lj�fi�? + � i�'�- G¢� ^ +�' ��f. j' ��• y7 I -� G iM 1 'r,fri• �� h •14Au. �` �� "r•. "}'�r�yC ••,7 o�uv{r �fx £ ��'� tot i`'��t�JlGiII,SeaS�FE�G�p� ;r� ` ' •'I"t �ti= " � • I s1,l1. it r ° '� I LEGEND , M M1�0�6T'IL W IIYIV /.V4YlA9t � PI /ice. ®.T•ao4 Pa v.w wra wew /� M, ,wpwWlti t.MWT(i CITY Or IrE \U_ QA 91 ^67. RAINCHO CUCANIO \'GA TI,•LE, Cerro UTI Ll drug i �$ PL UNNl \G DlV0004 EXIt1��}\ (/. , r - •:,`�. .'°' ` . yy��((�� '�. ��1yy�.jy..p�'�I" 'pal'.; •- n Y .^~).. .�•'�,' - t "i al "I N' T' ♦ y1` R• •t rl n 4f m! •r M1 r 4�u _ ii � r r r� • � f _ V V MRTH .crry or 07. ' RA \CHO CUCAMO GA Tnu. �i+ TA'I'it/l� TRAG -r f�q� f �PUNNING Dlvmc4 y = EkHtOf(I_C�SGtF� •ti:;.�•L ., r`r.l= Z!•!�6i'?.r_ f'•e1.,:f..�„>, u:`.i ?:w%tE'6r ��'�"i3"d1��`+a�iis 'iv; n s:. t i 0 I .y a STATISTICAL SUMMARY A rr m p C rr pv iri crr << or p . . -,, RA\CHO CLCANIO`;GA PLANNING DAMOV ExHIwT�LSCALE�_ t sad '�;{';�r; G y r 4 . 9 W � MOTU Il~-* .L'A9.YIIrz1 '. • �I1" r"ax r u�• m,Kay.om :» '•;'^+ `�,' ' ��:� SRO - .,,.,r '� I NORM CITY Of ITEM% RANCHO CUCAMONGA •, .,agwGgatru*i, Aoms li 3> PLj%"NNI \G DIVISION EXHIBIT, SCALD 7. { 0 L I a.u. saia a.•.• 1 AM•A JIDAiA pipe T/�Cet N A pwcpMGN �_ .L pon• er'vc. AMP c pw.os � _ . $ nmvawsrs s CI"!'Y Or —�- RA\CHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DiVIS:ON V V �r rm.Nll OD Tm.e� F'�AbINQ► -Ptsiy " :'.: ,. A x CITY OF RANCHO C(:G1ll/lO.'GA PUVNINZ DIVC)MN G� Nufmi w F: nn.e�.Ce�Jld�AcL �e��ufb. °` L•Y imm.-4Cq- SCA! -., r i f E, 0 ICJ b CITY OF k 7 RA\CI O CUCAiv,I4 \GA rx� ' PL N.NNIXG DIVLsn.N . -4ru^l'Tcrr. GUTLUM "`°"" Mms 7rfI1._[L!.�i:Oiti' tsATTiiS tiG Cc �3 E Ink] Rtna t87 i �D yd A wap •t u., wrr Im w.. u -- ff NOUH CITY Or rrEa3 RANCI10 CUCANIONGA 'n7't.E��Ar7lDHOMI @'f�C;70f►I�:p! PLAU8NING DIVMN � 4 n i 3 tsATTiiS tiG Cc �3 E Ink] Rtna t87 i �D yd A wap •t u., wrr Im w.. u -- ff NOUH CITY Or rrEa3 RANCI10 CUCANIONGA 'n7't.E��Ar7lDHOMI @'f�C;70f►I�:p! PLAU8NING DIVMN `J G6L'il n , ra C � / I w w SMMORco L,A Y Of �\CHO CL'CA�IO \GA E�HIWT s SQ%LEr ''A�t.'."'r.�3aCSnrr..n.r,, m _ r 1 Ci 10 " CITY Or RANCHO CCCAIN'I0,NGA Pl AkN II \G DI\ eaq 1 EL h 5 j� • ga y� ry atv .awe ep =I.... .I ` I i.o r.. - � n'atTr► 0 I 13 FM,121" 3 "%,TUllqRoLWZ r�� CITY 01-7 RAINCR) CUGkN'ION'CA PUkNNl,NG EVISON Nom ImVD Af--e z C r 1 1 - r r `J ITf:`Ul4.NLU Vo tl'��'�i�.� i ?''a91 �3 way �1 CITY Or IZAfi;CHO CUCAUMONGA Tnu' t��va- rionraz PI. 4NING DATSION EXHinm_ `� s_SCALE,_ r• 0 0 I's Ww!r�T,117,luiem CLWM d= mum CITY or lm' j, Po Agl-07. 'RAINCHO CUCAINIONGA TMD ASA 'r—a A,Ndpr - ' I ~ - Pi VO"!ING 1XV00IN EXHIMT, Lo SONLE, u I ORI IOU, 1011, AZ C CITY OF rrr-Ml PD. RAINCHO CUCAlvlOXGtj Tnu--" PUNNING DIVIMN 1 r M I b > r .. y r 1 5 I q , a' C � \1 .t � t .n H JPF AA CITY Oi rrE;n -- RANCHO CUCAMO \GA r4ivN1 \C DIVLS(QV, ` LXHIMTr C• M+ y r 1 5 I q , a' C � \1 .t � t .n H JPF AA CITY Oi rrE;n -- RANCHO CUCAMO \GA r4ivN1 \C DIVLS(QV, ` LXHIMTr CITY OF RANCRO rUCAXONGA INITIM STUDY Cr Ll PART I - PROJECT I2TeORHATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Pees $80.00 For all projects requiring enviroacantal Yeview, this form must be completed and submitted to the DavG10P0411t Review Committee through the department where the project application is made Upon re_Oipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II Of the Initial Study. The Davelopaent PAriew Committee will =sit and tare action no later than tan (10) days before the public meeting at which +.ime the project is to be heard. The Comvittco will m+dte one Of three determinations: 1) The project will hr.-re no environmental impact and a Nagative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an Onvironman•:al impacf and an Environmental impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional infomat:.on report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning • the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: DEER CREEK VILLAGE APPLICANT'S NAD)E, ADDRESS, TELEPHONEME ROBERT NAY£R CORPORATION 8121 F. Florence Avenue Downey Ca 90240 (21 3) 927 -3341 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: _Gtnnn Matsui, proi:ct Di. Tustin, Ca. 92680 (714) 731 -6011 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSE;7SOR PARCEL 'S.) r..,nnrnlly loo itrd on Arrow Route HSahwav be:ween Turner LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Y -) 66r C CITY OF RANCRO rUCAXONGA INITIM STUDY Cr Ll PART I - PROJECT I2TeORHATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Pees $80.00 For all projects requiring enviroacantal Yeview, this form must be completed and submitted to the DavG10P0411t Review Committee through the department where the project application is made Upon re_Oipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II Of the Initial Study. The Davelopaent PAriew Committee will =sit and tare action no later than tan (10) days before the public meeting at which +.ime the project is to be heard. The Comvittco will m+dte one Of three determinations: 1) The project will hr.-re no environmental impact and a Nagative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an Onvironman•:al impacf and an Environmental impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional infomat:.on report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning • the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: DEER CREEK VILLAGE APPLICANT'S NAD)E, ADDRESS, TELEPHONEME ROBERT NAY£R CORPORATION 8121 F. Florence Avenue Downey Ca 90240 (21 3) 927 -3341 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: _Gtnnn Matsui, proi:ct Di. Tustin, Ca. 92680 (714) 731 -6011 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSE;7SOR PARCEL 'S.) r..,nnrnlly loo itrd on Arrow Route HSahwav be:ween Turner LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Y -) 66r 1 ElOJECP DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: See Attaahment A ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTn?G AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: No exit ina s n+• +re;• see attached rroaect description for additional information. DESCRIBE TH ENVIRON)li_NCAL SETTING OF THE PROJEM' SITE INCWDING I'SFORMATION Of? "WOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TRM.i), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, GIS'CGRICAL OR SCENIC ASPE:CrS, USE Or SURROUNDING PROPERT'ES, MM THE DESCFIPTION OF ANY - • EXISTI:lG STRUCTURES AND 'Ilte'(R USE (AT ^_ACH NECESSARY SHEETS) i See Atta'•hment B c Is the project, part of r largar project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a wholo have significant environmental. impact? No. t ca WILY, THIS PROTECT: YES ND • ;• • x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? ' _x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noian or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, grater, sewage, etc.)? x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan deaignations7 _x S: Remove any existing trees? How many? X_ 6. Create the need for •jse or disposal of _ potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flaammbles or e.plosivo97 Explanation of any YE= crawora above: See Attachment C IMPOR^ANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, comploto the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that tia statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits presant the data and _ inforMaricn required for this initial evaluation to the ' bost.of ay ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and corrset to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to bo aubmitt d before �. an adequate evaulation car. be mIdib the Da e oaent Review Comvittee. V » Date_ // /j'9L_ Signature ,"r , Title qlt _w i RESIDENTIAL C04STRUCTIO4 . i� Tho f0110winq information should be provided to the City of Rancho Curaeonga Planning Division in order to aid ill assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed r'asidential development. 6:; Name of Devoloper and Tentative Tract No.: ROBERT MAYER CORPORATION Specific Location of Projects bounded by Arrox Ronte. Center` Avenue. ?" 26th Street .aud Turner Avenue. PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of sinsle family units: 44 _ _ 44 i 2. Number of multiple family units: A7 99 92 44 322 i i •'"�Date proposed to begin construction: 1983 4 _ 4. Earliest dace of Occapancy: 1984 u A ModnI A °j and ' of Tentative «S. BedroDns Price Ran -a Product A t� - d m 590.000 Unknown at this time. t Product B Avg. Based on market demand. 2 -3 BdrR. $72,000 Product C Avg. R 1 -2 Bdmn. $64,000 �i @.� J..'ff.iN"' ;:rtK. 'r.`4 '"r V.i,i e• 1 _ Q Y G'` . i6.s::��ti �%t»� VA ( \. e Attachment: A P• {: PROJECT DESC.'RIPTION } This application addresses a 35± acre site in the rauthwest section of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on both sides of thn prcpused Deer Creek Flood Control Channel. { The site has been planned in three sections or planning areas: Planning Area A consists of 6.3 acres in the southwest corner of the site. Forty -four zero - lot -line patio homes of 1130 square Peet to 1403 square feet have been planned for this area. Planning Area 8 includes the 16.7 acres )n the east aide of the Deer Creek Channel and is proposed as 172 townhouses of 1046 square fe•` to 1535 square foot with common recreational facilities. _ The northwest 10.9 acres of the site, Planning Area C, are planned to include 150 units of flat /townhouse combination of 740 square feet to 1133 square feet -nd one common recreational facilities site and two tat lots. The project will be built in four phases with a variety of units in each phase. 1 °t A P,J.'�,'S� L'!„�✓..� t; .:ir�v - .r ,l :M. "�.' „1..�A• -.. ..J �- A•1, %1J' -!� cl Attachment to Initial Study Part II - tentative Tract 11915 2. Hydrology (b)(f)(g) The removal of vineyards and subsequent construction will decrease the amount of open and unpaved areas and, therefore, decrease rain and flood water absorp- tion rates and increase surface water runoff. The Conceptual Grading Plan and hydrology map have taken these factors into account. The proposed development intends to divert the majority of the surface runoff into the Deer Creek Chan- nel aid only a very small amount will be emptied into Turner Avenue. 4. Flora (d) Construction wilt result in the removal of the existing vineyard. However, the vineyard industry has diminished in recent years and this would not have a significant adverse impact on the industry as a whole. 5. Population (a) The development of this project will ha•a the potential to increase the pop- ulation of the immediate area by 36.1 households. This increase in population will crease additional demand for services. However, as an infill project, these services are available. 6. Socio- Economic Factors (a) The p,•cpu!ed development has the potential to affect property values on the subject land as well as on land to the immediate vicinity. The effects are not aiti ipated to be detrimrntal. 7. '.and Use and Planning Considerations (a) The Project site contains an existing vineyard, therefore, the construction of tats project will be a substantial alteration of the existing land use. The proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan land use desig- nation of Medium High Residential. 8. Transportation (a)(b)(d)(f)(g) This project will generate increased •vehicular traffic volumes which could potentially result in increased number of traffic hazards involving motor vehicles, pedestrians, or bicyclists. The development of the project will in lude the upgrading of those streets surrounding the property and the construction of the internal pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation network that will be able to adequately accommodate projected traffic flows 10. Health, Safety, and Nuisance Factors (e) N Increase in noise levels resulting from this project will be due Primarily, � to increased vehicular traffic volumes and normal human activities in a residential area Increased noise levels during construction will be temporary. Setbacks, berming, and dense landscaping will be used to gr; reduce impacts and decrease noise levels. Attachment to IniLial Page 2 Study Part 11 - Tentative Tract 11915 11. Aesthetics (b) The MGM vineyards neeins in thtct structures uld beaeetically unplesi gtothersdt theadjaen singleamily devalcawnis. However, the Growth Management Review process rovides the n t review architectural el�pp nnpad ether nlements ordurtoassuretheaessthAticquaityofthe edro - duot. t, 1 T. yS , ,, • q ME Y• Attachment D ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Topography The majority of thr. project site is generally flat with a slight crossfall fcom the northeast to the southwest corner of the site. The overall change in elevation is approximately 25 feet. The site is bisected into east rnd west halves by Deer Creek which is intended to be a fully ,roved channel in 1982. Vegetation The project site is currently in agricultural use. Vineyards cover both haloes of the site. Surrounding Land Uses The Ia Mancha Municipal Golf Course is locateil south of Arrow Route along center Street to the east of the project site. Directly south of 26th Street is an existing single family residential area with many older structures. There is a fairly • now single family residential development south of Arrow Route along Turner Avenue, west of the project site. A market is located along Arrow Route just west of Turner Avenue. To the northwest of the site, there is a development of apartments with a segment of undeveloped land along Turnor, north of Arrow. Directly north of Arrow P.oute, east of Turner and west of the Deer Creek channel is an undeveloped lot. To the east of Deer Creek, on the north side of Arrow Route is a trucking firm, Pacific States Transport. Extending eastward from Pacific States Transport are more vineyards and undevoloped land. A community church is located at the southeast corner of 26th Street and Center Avenue. A large business park is being developed to the northwest of the project site, between Foothill Boulevard-and Arrow Route It is bounded on the west by Haven Avenue and extends eastward to the Santa Fe Railroad tracks. The first phase of his development, including•A R -Mart and other commercial uses, is currently under construction on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Routo. To the northwest of the pre'nct site, between Haven Avenue and Rochester Avenue, generally south of Baseline Road and ,. north of Footh -11 Boulevard is a 1320 -acre propoaed planned community known as Teria Vista. t Attachment C WILL THIS PRCJECT- 2. Change from exiating agricultural uses to proposed residential uses tasy resalt i� an increase in noise levels. 3. The completion rC Ue proposed 366 hcmes will necessitate additional public, services to the project site. In Preliminary convarvations with the appropriate departments and agencies, the auiticipated change in demand does not appear to be ea:cesaivu. 4. A zone change and total developsont application is b9ing submitted concatrreetly with this Initial Study. The zvne change request its from R -1 to R -3 which would make the zoning consistent: with the approved General Plan designation for the a-te of Medium Density Residontial. a 67 V' ri!. '��"3:i1T�{'in• %�`.i•,'•tc•.�. "_�( °�'r`'..r�;5�+ _ ��'• 0 i C C RESOLUTION NO. 82 -27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11915 NHERE.4S, Tentative Tract Yap No. 11915, hereinafter ".Nap" submitted by The Robert Mayer Corporation, applicant, for the purpose of „ subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a subdivision for a total planned development of 44 patio homes and 322 townhouse units on 35 acres in the R -1 zone (R- 3 /P.D, pending), located between Arrow and 26th Street, and between Turner and Center Avenues, APN 209- 091-05. 06, 07) into 58 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 10, 1982; aad WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Conmission has read and considered the - Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of tho City of Rancho ,• Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission Rakes the following findings In regard to e5 titive Tract tb. 11915 and the Map thereo`: (a) The tentative tract 4s consistent with all applicable Interim and proposed general and specific plans, (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of de- velopment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avo'.dable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative trac' is not lio,ly to cause serious public health probinns; (f) Tye design of antative tract will n.t conflict with any easeme•• acquired by the public at large, now p_ of record, for cess through or use of the property :Ah within the propo ed subdivision. a v Resolution No. C2 -21 Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse Impacts on the eaUrbnment and a Negative Declaration Is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract :tap No. 11915, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twenty - four (24) months Tim the approval o° this project unless an extension has been granted by tim Planning Commission. 2. All units with a driveway apron for Lite grirage less than twenty (20) feet shall be provided with aLtomatic garage door openers. 3. The patio home front yard landscaping, and an Speropriate Irrigation system, shall be installed by the &veloper in accordance with submitted plans. Said front yarl land- _ scaping shall include an average of two fifteen gallon trees, in addition to street trees. a. The patio homes shall be provided with return fencing between each unit. S. Detailed elevations of the carports shall be provided in the final construction package. 6. Dense landscaping and berming, including vines and shrub:;, shall be planted Against perimeter walls and fences, amd extend out from the sides of the two carports adjacent to Turner 1 Trees shall lea plant ^d between garage doors in the town- house oortions of the project 8. Details and typical elevations of wall and fences shall be included in tree final construcLion package. Perimeter walls and fences shall be decorative and include such features as columns, texture treatment and trim cap. 9 Planter boxes shall be provided on upstairs windows 10 The stairway landing shall be constructed with a post to support the roof canopy 11 A tot lot should be located adjacent to the swimming pool in Planing Area e w w V= Ll r i+ !1 i i. ;9 Resolution No. 82 -27 Page 3 r C 12. The main interior circulation drive in Planning Area 04ould be provided with a continuous sidewalk on tot.. sides of the drive. 13. Additional texturmd paving crosswalks should be provided to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 14. Access to 04 Dt -r Creek Channel, as shown on the approved site plans, shall va provided in accordance with City Counc.' Resolution No. 81 -93. Details shall be included i,i the final construction package to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 15. Directory signs shall be provided at primary access points to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 16. No construction will be permitted within AnV Corps of Engineers temporary easement for Deer Creek until it is released by them. 17. Construction of off -site improvements beyond a phase boundary may be required at the discretion of the City Engineer and shall be bonded for prior to recorda- tion of that phase. 18. All median islands at the entrance of the private access roads shall have a setback of a minimum of 5 feet from the right -of -way line. 19. The following street improvements beyond the centur tines of t!,e following perimeter streets to the satisfaction of the City Engineer may be required: a.) Turner Avenue - Existing P.C.C. pavement may be removed and be replaced with asphalt concrete pave- ment of minimum 6 inches thick. b ) Arrow 114ghway and Center Street - Reconstruction or asphalt overlay of the existing pavement may be required depending on the design to provida standard cross slope on the reconstructed street APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH, 1982. PLAWIiIG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 7 i ti• r,. Resolution 11o. 82-27 ■ O G. I, JACK LAN, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. do hereby certify that the foregoing Reso:ution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March, 1982, by the following vote - :o -wt t: AYES COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, 701stoy, Dahl, Remyel HOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ` ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: King s e of c� i ,O L r Y a S Le 0 sa- x a s r Sr mac: _` - E S -_fit /rt xy 71 E IL xSY 8 It LA ?� 7 A S= _ = E a is L r . °z s i:a' ?e Err 8 3 'H pY rz E 9i c- yy sd s ies is " a3 SA „�' =.S •9_Ei G4 9S At+"L3L t s L. s 3P i� 3 �_ of �• c e�E. 3? ;_ - .s5 _a. l= �E L9 6 E5 : E � ,i- i3 ' Pi -L rsi at J�3 Le j_ -9 9 _ -Ed -- g. :�A :ca. a =rt g 3:a IP �: 3 ss s-• x'a G ss -a: 3: H Sic g5 IN {l X ^eaa e2y 3A`se 8a 3g iQ= a_a3i €Zs s !i .3 ?F' fs° 5c s °r .t !t: Arfg sac ,Y =p9 2e a£s" .s -? a 83e r S Is t s L. s 3P i� 3 �_ of �• c e�E. 3? ;_ - .s5 _a. l= �E L9 6 E5 : E � ,i- i3 ' Pi -L rsi at J�3 Le j_ -9 9 _ -Ed -- g. :�A :ca. a =rt g 3:a IP �: 3 ss s-• x'a G ss -a: 3: H Sic g5 IN {l X ^eaa e2y 3A`se 8a 3g iQ= a_a3i €Zs s !i .3 ?F' fs° 5c s °r .t !t: Arfg sac ,Y =p9 2e a£s" .s -? a 83e r ro L a F �r�g ds_` yr "s€ g 33:8 3xg e_ 3 -=s =�a - R• $Fs � � ?- ? E z • � ss� �9� r "�_ s 3t a9 a „ Y az &s zs3 da3 ax o *I RL :s x oaf :st€ zsa MQx3o$xr -a ky3ay sVa s Vj;%Js_F f $ ay is $a 9 aFc - x B =E s=�5P�` 3s . $ -i -s- 3aF ra 8 ana z M. ix3 -yx fss ss • _-p Tip - of sx aaR xs 5? y? 'F:? ..:�sFz... "r$: `+ Grip• - ; �':� v . >..al � •;ht"T,eF-5:: J°l .'i: � Y +•s.. � •.b.: - t •" Z -max )�:.t_•viYqi� ml f d. a s 3 =fie P Hl a= i 3. €dc x 3= 3ie grES ra 3gzis s s r ;a ac ri.x _i € 3oa a ias ma3 -! ?ae`a s, x a sz SSZ. �•d € g� L`i � fa? a -3 fYaSe a =^ a °a� " -7 < y� T -' a s ^a s3 if ss ria. a �.�s tei ss;IE: �g V oB x r k P rs� 5 6 ` Ems' 7ti . tS '. a ¢__ '„ iS Ste: Vi=a ex =ad _ aaa a FL d oy �e x_3 i�° ^dB 27 • %Z3 �. _mot as Sz- 3 ass s,a - I_ ; — - ?- ' csx CA S-. f- as -s° s �� 'I a` EBI xg ?' : c Bea s ?¢L s 3a: 5 ° e- rp •• -_ ,' -� d�rc ss 3 b =? e" 3i "s =is S -sae a'wi .Irr�'as - a ? s 4 3 ='a 5t s: €a a8a3a :3 tss sa x_ -p =¢3 s- _`a9 ac� •x a r13 s a a $s &S I - fs3 8 <. a ie? == 9ga� "c 3ess 'r3 SaS i:s '3 j="3 ps Zj -v - °E7a5s?3ds3:s;°= s a3= egg E3afi3a= 3 i r Er Ea z_ I st &_ T,k 33E f .e :3 f:z- r' : _ g_ aM If C = '3a =:ses: �_!r .a95 L r a -- (3zi�zi ' 77 a gB 3 .E rC- a '> 3f s- €fzs a�ra .•' IT cs : as`'' '3 5. ?� s= r' 's al,•fex 3zc 3ze3 H��3 � :. as5� °Srs= •xrp s e3 =2 °e !! =rb -' rr_o.3a3.3 3'-Z x -0 3z3e E -a °" a ? d3 "r' - -= V 'aa 33 sri- i- --- ��'.` ass � 3�g. s':a$ ?a�s` a�'sE r sE �2� �- �rLi58 :=s €F:e si N eSE sr *f =a 3•g� sac. t3f2 a E'r ar 3a S 3_ rr r� _ ^ ra ra ra #act � S$ a�i � rd 5r 3a t K I I� �I •I XI +I '•k' t13. �v'�+: V;�G: rl? a:�.,:1 �"'+Y,ykil. f?.�:r,�fG � .. 7x;. \,'�•Ath'iJ 7; a Y i i H • J S Vg g! : F E� i s`Y a, a 'EF :s 3• r R °�� !c 3 c a _. r€ ?� =P :? �s :Yak s :z ?s rs _s' 5 g Ez g ? 3F a ° -; "3 n3 se E3 e s 21 s 3a g?? sr =E acs $z i� SE 1: HZE 3 y3:g FF = -z 2= `V 5, - so I. s: $a _ � _. � __ • »-g as is r sa s� rs �° gs I °3� Y9 'B J e I- �r7y r ��• 8 ='j E' _ a Sgj: Yae 3x U t 9 -. i s 33en = FF. g sa8 _3 =_ -75 •. s Ira •" is t :t to Y C[' =. 93 as t--- .1 3a g:esF Ia- i ¢ Y t'aay- a�= 33� rg 3'f a 3r i.r .a ia: Eg 28 zzz 23 -..2 3e5 <� 8 �! x1. q I- �r7y r ��• 8 ='j E' _ a Sgj: Yae 3x U t 9 -. i s 33en = FF. g sa8 _3 =_ -75 •. s Ira S ly 3a g:esF Ia- i t'aay- a�= �a rg e'�33s _ ! , if § 2 | | �| | y t| — a, ©` K§ . 2l27i! - }\ \ \ }. . j |] /� �� a !! m2 _ liltu H6 zzal ' X1 A 1 RESOLUTION NO. 82 -28 A PESOLUTIOA OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMIISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED ' DEVELOPMENT NO. 8142 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN ` THE ZONING FROM R -I TO R- 3 /P.D. FOR 35 ACRES ,r LOCATED BETWEEN 1URNER AND CENTER AVENUES , (APN 209 - 09145, 06, 07) e r r WHEREAS, on the -uth day of June, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of March, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the ' California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following_f1-ndin7s: 1. That the subject property Is suitable for the usris, permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, - size, and compatibility with existing land use in • the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment • nor the surrounding properties; ar.d 3. That the proposed zone change :s in conformance. _ with the General Plan. - SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found --•� that this fro ert w111 not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration on March 10, 1982. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: ' �'; 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the 9 Califa,-nia Government Code, that the Planning ----° Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby y� recommends approval on the 10th day of March, — 1902, Planned Development No. 81 -07. ttrl .3� 2. The Planning Commission hereby recozmends that the V. City Council approve and adopt planned Development No. 81 -02. dt, 3. That a Certified Copy of tbls Resolution and related -.. material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission. •��} shall be forwarded to the City Council, _ •• `• > s Resolution No. 82 -28 = Page 2 J i A. All com9ticas of approval applicable to Tentative t. Tract Nc 1.915 shall apply to this Planned Development. APPROVED AND f THIS 10TH OAY OF MARCH, 1982. r' PLAN13ING COMjiISSION OF THEXLTY,OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C 1, JACK LAM, Secr -tab of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ?' t, C.uaronga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and - regularly introduc:d. passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: x O AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Dahl, Tolstoy, Rempel NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: CO11HISSIONERS: King _ m ..Y�- I 'w 7 ^ YY � y 5'l.. h i` s!, , O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Hay S. 1982 r TD: City Council and city Manager FROM: Lloyd B. ilay,. City Engineer BY. Barbara Krall, Engineering i1rchnician SUBJECT, Vacation of Unne,e sary S.reuts so. Alleys Within the Victoria Protect The vacaticn of etreets and alleys ar rP:an on the attached drawing is required prior to the recurdatlon of thL tract maps within William Lyon's Victoria Project. The William Lyon Company has requested that the public hearing for the subject vacation be set so that final approval of the tracts would not be celayed. _ Since the tract maps are not yet ready for final approval, it, is necessary to continue the public hearing to coincide with final map approvdl. Notice for public hearing have been poster at the site and notice has been sent to Tha William Lyon Company. RECMENDATICN: It is recoamanded that City Council o>Itirue the public h.2aring until June 2. 1982, when the tract maps arc submittee for t nal approval. Resectrully submi ted, LBH :E�t t Attachments .r �f „ls J � I Fr I- - v : i 1. � ' I I.1 I '�L, i• i TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 11934 �'�e�V��BI .r_ � �••'I��•�• ".yY, yY.. ve p M { t BE VACATED TRACT BOUNMRY ••,....! ' .1 ... 600' RAONS `, — e'�i .f' •N:'i . *.,;,' '.� f CITY OF F.ANCRO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT M a B z DATE: May S. 1982 TO: Members of the City Council and City Manager FROM: JacL• Lam, AICP. Dircctor c' Conmmity Development SUBJECT: RESOLUTION REGAROING LAND USE rOLICY IN NORTH ALTA LOMA As per Council request. * 6-solution has been drafted stating Council pollry regarding lard uce and development in north Alta Loma Since the Resolution is self - explanatory, no further ex- planation is necessary. REspectfully submitted. 'rector JL:,1k Attach �4 =�� s• kII��' �Sr `..�sd�;•,.�,CS�Ai`sJl•__.... I_`y(/(, • i' lj: RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATING,COUNCIL POLICY REINFORCING AND CLARIFYIN(KTHE Pl}CYi LITfY!SE'SSTR7iGEEE)NTI"DEllRIANN0L `TR PLAN LAND USE POLICIESf I. PORIt 'THSAI 1 4 VENI E 10 ni .04N •rt ORDEREa.:BY, TH WHEREAS,,the City CoLncil,of the City.of Rancho Cucamonga his v 't adopted a Land Use Element of the' General' Plan;iand,, t (`k*- WHEREAS. the Land Usc,,Elenvint contains a land use pion ip , . ec land use categories; and WHEREAS, that area of the City generally bounded by the north city limits, west city limits, Haven Avenue and Banyan Street, contains designations of 'Very Lou" density (less than 2 units per acre); and WHEREAS. the City Council desires to protect and maintain the land use character that exists in that area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: ,.2 1. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby states Its intention to maintain all those properties in the above-described area having the General Plan designation of 'Very Low" density for residential developments having a minimum lot size of 20.000 square feet; and 2. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga will adopt no zoning district(s) other than that W.ch will result In c minimum lot size of-20,000 square feet for properties having General Plan designations of 'Very Low' density in the above- described area. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of may, lgs*-. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: . I L =ICITY OF RANCHO CUdAU.ONGi 0 DATE: Nay S, 1982. TO: "ers of the'City council and,City Manager FROM: .Jack _ AICP,'DIrec6r-6f Community Developaient BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: COUNTY OF SAN B . ERNAROINO PROPOSAL FOR TAX EXEMPT ffiRTGM E REVENUE BOND—FOPW ABSTRACT: This report discusses the proposed San Bernardino County Ya—x-fx—empt Mortgage Revenue Bond program and recommends that the City. Council adopt a Resolution of Intent to cooperate in 'Jie program. BACKGROUND: San Bernardino County Is preparing a Housing Mortgage Revenue Be d program to provide below market rate interest for financing of n, er-e fed dwelling units. This program Is similar to the pre- vious efforts the County has uncrertaken to provide for below market rate interest to home buyers. On two other occasions the City has agreed to cooperate with the County in entering into this bond program effort. The current bond program proposal is' for a $51.2 million Assue-forthe r---ty and all cooperating ct F`nul-& Lhe City wish to provide the' op n use I rle FoMnd=m. money In Rancho Cucamonga, then far u i co � the tu 't! a n I n s d construction of an agree- ment Co ty 0 r ment Lbe weendt�heuon a Ma the City of Rancho•Cucamonga Is necessary. Enclosad with this report is a letter from the County of San Bernardino prov,ding background information or. the program. The following is•& summary of those characteristics: o Program will be eligible for first time home buyers.;; a Eligible participants may eant to 120k of-'the Statewide median income ($37,70.0 o Use for the purchase of d new home up to $80,370, * or,' existing none up to $74,070. ! . o Interest,rate starts at 11.6%,and graduates ,to-13.5Y. o Projects eligible for use of mortgage coney should I be rejidy to sell between July-1982 and July 1983. City Council Agenda Nay S. 1982 Mortgage Revenue Bonds Page 2 The City benefits frog this program because it provides the necessary money available in the bond mortgage market by utilizing the County's expertise and effort to prepare the necessary documents to issue the mortgage revenue bonds. The County has indicated that they will have a representative available " qtr at the meeting to answer any further questions the Cwncil may here. Y . RECOM14ENDAitoN: It is recommended that the City Cwncil adopt the i? attached solution for cooperation with the County of San Bernardino on the Housing Finance Revenue Bond program and authorize the mayor to execute the cooperative agreement between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Roncbj Cucamonga. Respectfully submitted, Director of CommuaftY-Development JL:TJB:,ir Attachments: Letter from San Bernarlino County Resolution Draft Copy of Cooperation Agreement 1 �r • ,�'.nhtFKiRi 3�1•,'xwp�.�..i,si�''E :� ��^ n ..:'�� tv'SL`;Y... sc s^ OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT `a mIAI[Street SN(e,Mldiro.CA92415 (71,13812946 April 14, 1982 hr. Tim Beadle, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 9340 Baseline - Unit A Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Beadle: COUNTY Of SAN BERNARDINO ENVIHONMENTAL PUBLIC WORKS AGLVCY RECEIVED APR 19 1982 CRY OF RANCHO CUCUONC1 ENSUIEERL4S Dri!S!O!l The Court-/ of San Bernardino Is In the process of structuring a tax - exempt mortgage revenue bond program to provide bald- market Interest rate financing for owner - occupied dwalling units. Participants In the program must be first- time homebuyers and they must cam 1203 or less of the statewide median Income which is approximately $34,700. Additionally the purchase price of each rest - dence must not exceed 903 of the average area purchase price which Is $8u 370 In non- targeted areas and $98.230 In targeted areas. Current target areas Include the following census tracts: 14, 48, 49, 56, 57, 60, 65, 69, 89.02. 91.01 and 96.03. These funds can be used for both newly constructed and existing housing although the majority of the funds will be utilized for newly constructed housing. • In order to provide this financing In your Jurisdiction, your city must formally participate with the County In Its program. The formal vehicle for this part;- - cipation Is the adoption or the attached resolution and cooperation agreement by your city council. The attached agreement differs from prior agreements In the following ways: 1) There is no longer a sectlar whldl piohibits the city from participating In a compet!ng bond Issue. 2) The County Is requesting that the City apply car Its state entitlement allocation If requested by the County and/or to assign Its entitlement allocation to the County. However, If your city needs your entitlement allocation to wxmplete your own bend Issue, please utilize the cooperation agreement with the "SB 99 version" notation on the upper left -hand comer. The County wishes to issue the bonds by the end of June Therefore, !t Is Important that the Office of Community Development receive the executed cooperation agreement and the adopted resolution as soon as passible but not later than flay 21, 1982. If your city does not wish to participate, we would appreciate a brief letter stating your decision . Please notify Pam Newcomb at 383 -3764 or Clyde Henderson at 383 -3761 if you have any questions or cannot meat the above deadline Thank you. ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY OFFIC F CO UHIa DEVELOPMENT DON NEIICOME, Dir•nt r '�4�`JA�4 t! \J41.� va,suH• I GlVe4NAmw 8w of Su .$ wntauuKl DAVID L t.UUNNA 71"O'SaW BxudDMrt1 RODtRrO YOWhSEAO .Fm ND+ir.c,+ ACycf? HAW.00A ' Fm. 13. k% .f ;7 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, ADOPTING A HOUSING FINANCE REVENUE BOND PROGRAM IN COOPZR4TION WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNANDINO AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHEREAS. there is a shortage in the County of San Bernardino (tile 'County ") and in the City of RANCHO CUCAMONGA (the `City') of decent, safe and sanitary housing, particulrrly of housing affordable by persons in the lower and of the purchasing spectrum, and a consequent r..ed to encourage th^ construction of homes affordable by such persons and other- wise to increase the housing supply in the County and in the City for such persons; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County has adopted an ordinance declaring its intent to engage in a housing finance 'revenue bond program (the 'Program') pursuant to Part 5 of Division 31 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California (the 'Act ") and to issue bonds pursuant to the Act to provide funds for the Program; and a WHEREAS, this Council finds and determines that it is in the best interest of the City to adopt the Program and to consent to the operation of the Program by the County within the geographic boundaries of the City pursuant to the Act. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED. by the Council of the City of RANCHO CUCAMONGA as follows: y 1. The City hereby adopts the Program for the purpose of increasing the housing supply in the County and to the City and consents to the operation of the Program by the County with respect to all property located within the geographical boundaries of the City. 2. The cooperative agreement, dated 1982, between the County and the Ly a greement "), 3 a copy of which is attac,cd hereto as Exhibit A. is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are here- by authorized and directed to execute and d -liver said Agreement, for t-d in the name and on behalf of the City. The Mayor, with the advice and consent of the City Attorney, is authorized to approve any additions t: to or changes in the form of said Agreement which they deem necesszry or advisable, their approval of such additions or changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution by the Kayo• of said Agreeveat as so rcv : added to or changed. The Mayor, with the advice and consent of the City Attorney, is further authorized to enter into such additional agreements with the County, 4 i 9 i elution No. a2 execute such other documents or take such other actions as they-may deetre necessary or appropriate to carry out the purpose and intent of the Agreement or to cooperate in the implementation of the Program. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of Nay. 1982 AYES: NOES ABSENT, won p. a s, or ATTEST: au Re . asserwn, L ry er 0 r+.. ?�,=' AI .,c�ji3tyf•'.Aid��".+.lt�-�•..� rGl-i..e/ .. .. .... -.... �i.�.�i�.4h1�•F,••a COOPERATIVE ACHEEIENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY CF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA THIS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement "). made and entered Into as of , 1982 by and between that County of San Bernardino, a political subdivision of the State of California ad the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a political subdivision of the State of California (the "City "). W I T H E S S E T M: 7 WHEREAS, the County has determined to engage In a housing finance revenue bend program pursuant to Chapters 1-5 of Part 5 of Division 31 of the •• Health and Safety Code of the State of California (the "Act ") to make or purchase, directly or indirectly, loans to finance the construction or s acquisition of btmes In the County, all as provided far in the Act (the > "Program "); and WHEREAS, the County, pursuant to the Act, has adopted the Program by Ordinance Ha. 2495 and has determined to cooperate with the City pursuant to the Act in the exercise of its eowors under the Act for purposes of the Program; NOT, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter provided, the parties hereto agree as follows: Seeticn 1. Than terms used in this Agreement shall, for all purposes of this Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein, have the meanings assigned to sucn term in the Act. Section 2. The County agrees to undertake the Program and to Issue its Residential Hortgb,e Pevenua Bonds Issue of 1982 (the "Bonds "), therefor pursuant to the Act s% soon as practicable. Section 3. The Glry hereby agrees to cooperate with the County in the exercise ,jointly or otherwise of their powers for the purpose of financing hemo mortgages pursuant to the Act from the proceeds of the Bonds by agreeing that the Count/ shall exercise such powers to nuke or purchase home mortgages under the Program, all as more specifleslly sat forth in the Act, with respect to — property located within the geographic bounds: ies cf the City. Section 4 The City agrees to undertake such further proceedings or actions as may be necassary in order U carry out the terms and the intent of this Agreement. Section 5. The City agrees to undertake such further proceedings or actions as may be necessary in order to awry out the terms and the intent of this Agreement. Nothing In this Agreement shall prerent the County from entering into one or more egreements with other political subdivisions within the County, if deemed necessary and advi.9able to do so ey the County. f t�m;a City Attorney LSEALI County ens [SEAL] i �a es 1^ S, Section G. fits Agreement may be amended by one or more supplemental agreements executed by the County and the City at any tine, except that no such amendment or supplement small be made mhich shall adversely affect the rights of the holders of any bonds issued by the County pursuant to the Act in ' connection with Uie program. IN WITNESS WRERECF, the parties hereto have cawed this Agreement to be executed and attested by their proper officers thereunto duly authirized, and their official Seals to be hereto affixed, all as of the day first above written. CITY OF COIRTIY OF SAN BERNARDINO By: fry: Mayor Chairman, o Supervisors AITEST: ATTEST: By: By: City Clerk Clerk, board of pery so—i rs — APPROVED AS TO FORK: APPROVED AS TO FORM: f t�m;a City Attorney LSEALI County ens [SEAL] i �a a J fR' �i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May S. 1982 c TO: City Council and City Manager . FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Si*BJ' -T: Addendums to Desi n Contracts for Industrial Assessment str ct 8[- Attached for Council approval are contract addendums and change orders with Willdan Associates, Lockwaod Engineering, and Williamson 8 Schmid for design work in conjunction with the Industrial Asseasm:ent District. Changes were made necessary for a variety of reasons but primarily related to additional work for the "S" curve realignment of Sixth Street and the extension of local storm drains north of the railroad which were not shown in the master plan of drains Assessment District 82 -1 Design Contract Change Data - Firm Reaso•i for Change Original Increase Revised Amount Total Contract WILLDAN Added right of way $110,000 $35,000 $145,000 ASSOCIATES acquisition, negotiation with Chevron Development Co. added plan check due to increased scope of work, added boundary and parcel mans required. LOC1300 Added �esign of "S" curve 83,000 25,000 108,000 ENGINEERING on Sixth St., modification to storm drain 19F. Prepara- tion of Record of Survey to verify property locations in the "S" curve area. Miscel- laneous changes to plans to reflect changing property owner coordination WILLIAMSON Extension of storm drain 5D 175,000 33,000 200,000 b SCHNID and 19D. kcquirnl additional surveys and :csign calcuations and plan sheets Correspondence and contract change orders are attached which explain the.changes; in greater detail. Staff analyzed all claims and concur in their validity. . continued... ; �. .' �' :•��Rµ�; •'� `� -. � - ... .: slims+ .kY•{]� "r1�4 •�';• l ..SlM ire w • . -J.. r'I �.r�- `�S I t 1 7i ��' "�"`a+v t, «.ae, ' �' I. Y•[. �e' �i.'�"c'�`�i3�= 'w�+�'S_.`r,..y� .�r. n. � � • , _ -_ .. tc..t..,,".- a',. f: =' Staff Report ` Addend'ms to Design Contract'A.O. 82 -1 May 5, 1982' Page 2 " ' �.•�,�,•,' Funds to cover the contract changes will be provided, as with the original contracts, through loans from Storm Drain and Syatew Development Funds. These funds as you recall tre supplemented by a S100.0DO advance on assessments from the R.C. Lana Co. These funds will be returned with interest at bond sale. RECO.'VENDATION: It is reco7mnded that Council approve the attached contract changes and addendums and authorize the Mayor slid City Clerk to execute. It is further recommended that Council authorize a loan to Assessment District 82.1 in the amount of $93,000 to be drawn. from Storm Drain and Systems Develeptnect funds. ResnectIo•ly submitt d, LBM:bc Attachnents . -M 0 ? � to eoereneT •la" Design Engineering PortlonVA of 1 " "' }J( ""• e Assessment Distrint 82 -1 alrl8lglmi8l�ilogat��a f "Feb Peb 22,1982 P, To�o4X!t�QB�DAIRE&RI'10 ANILPJIR9 A nQHrA1X Tfr r Engineer - Yam an sent' mlonted to cr ply .rtA the felloetat cu,t ro tmo t6 agrezment for engineering services. Deunptbn of Chutes DECREASE ICREAS9 _ b Coetnct Price to Cwtcut Price ° 8ectirn III. (L)- Compensation i S Additions, Revislona and Deletions of off -site improvement plans as requested Total Estimated increase $ 25,000.00 TOTALS S p5 nnn_00 NET CHANGE IN C0;t7RA_ RfCl: S ___pg�000 pg,_ • JUSTIFICATION: Per Letters of November 20,1981 and February 4,19829 Indicating the additional vork tequested to be furnished. l CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Theaaoant at the Cntmct.,jibe Coe,""(tausasadl By Thaler, CC TWENTY -FIVE TEOUSAN7 DOLLJOS ENGINEERING SERVICES COHTiRAGM14H8P(,G1A%P9 t CAVSIUNITY DMLOPMFNT OM. fr� FEB 2A 198L eoereneT •la" Design Engineering PortlonVA of 1 " "' }J( ""• e Assessment Distrint 82 -1 alrl8lglmi8l�ilogat��a f "Feb Peb 22,1982 P, To�o4X!t�QB�DAIRE&RI'10 ANILPJIR9 A nQHrA1X Tfr r Engineer - Yam an sent' mlonted to cr ply .rtA the felloetat cu,t ro tmo t6 agrezment for engineering services. Deunptbn of Chutes DECREASE ICREAS9 _ b Coetnct Price to Cwtcut Price ° 8ectirn III. (L)- Compensation i S Additions, Revislona and Deletions of off -site improvement plans as requested Total Estimated increase $ 25,000.00 TOTALS S p5 nnn_00 NET CHANGE IN C0;t7RA_ RfCl: S ___pg�000 pg,_ • JUSTIFICATION: Per Letters of November 20,1981 and February 4,19829 Indicating the additional vork tequested to be furnished. l e r Theaaoant at the Cntmct.,jibe Coe,""(tausasadl By Thaler, CC TWENTY -FIVE TEOUSAN7 DOLLJOS Dmllan(S 25,OOOs('0 ) The Cmuact Total tacladlat Ibis mad pre°ioes Out* Orden fill Be.02LE- v1't+nvva vnneavy,- 5' .t DOLLARS _Dollars is 108,000.00 ). ry The Coaled Period Pmnd,d roe Coepinroe Will Be(Ianeasedl(Oeemited) (Vat mntem E68'Appliea T1u dacvwnt all beeeae a uppleamat b the contract ud all prcdalms ail apply karats. _— Retaastd (City of Rancho Cucamonga) (Date) ' (Director of Publ!e Works) Aagte! � Pe.t, ee iflan , 'r (Engineer) (Data) a .i� Appra.ed et' (City of Ranch Cucamonga) ata �;.. • This information will be used as record of any changes to the original engineering agreement. •Si E •1� Yq G... led c' S > NtA GuIG LOCKWOOD ENGINEERING R SURVCYING COMPANY. INC:. ., 2a0 WG{> F001"I l Rout NAwa. SYITG r RIALTO. CAt110Gw14 n,176 1 Iw wsht MIOG 4U1. 1* LIB Anseeasent District 8: -1 ( 79-1) Pe`Iruary 4,1982 Dea10m Eaginrering Services C ®unity Development Department Engineering Division Fbst Office Bost 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 At" LLOYD B. HUBBS, City Eartneer Dear Mr Hibbs, Our Assazwmt District, 82 -1, bas a:rtainly been as active and ebareging eballsnge in the lesign stage, with the army rdditlonsi revisions, deletions, etc, that ve have vorY.ed with on the pert of the ash Properties and owners. Attached is a copy of min• letter to you, dated Novmbla• 20,1981, which addressed our contract, and the need for amending paragraph IIL,(4), compensation for the Roeneering design. The wAlreenentw vas entered into on Mtg 7,1981, and ve have been vorking on the prOJeet since that time.During that period there have been increases in vage females, ns mted and provided for in 741hibit "Aw of the Agreement, and vhic5 bas been acknowledged by the City. In the above sited Setter of Normber*20,1981, many Stems vere addressed that amounted to an Increase in the men of the work by this firm. Since tb, there hove been runty additional items, such as the following: 1, Faveouts, Additions and deletions as desi.•9 by the property owners within thr� District. 2. Deletions of streets, requiring of revisions in the Plana and Quantities, 3. Adjustments and rcvlelans of Cross- sections to provide for paveost requirenents. 4. Additional meetings and consultations regarding the revisions, addition: etc. 5. Pro - rations of costs for the Necor Development, per City request. 6. Additional field and office vork to satisfy tae City of Ontario at the veil site. T. Deletla'ns of temporary story drain -yatms and the additional design of Final Installations, based on paveout revisions. 8, Provide for Irrigation systems to medium strips, 9• Revise specification format frame Special Conditions to Technical Specifications. Based on what ve kkmv at this time, the Design Engineering nbould not exceed a total of ONE hUhaRm EIGB: TMUSAND DOLLARS ( $ 108,000,00:, in increase c: 7HEN17- FIVE THOUSAIO) DOLLARS ( $ 25,000.00 ) over the MGM -THIM THOUSAND DOLLARS, ( $ 83,000.00 ) as in the Original agreement. This is based on all of the additions, revisions, etc that have been passed on to us as of this time. If the City and property Owners vithin the District are going to have additional agp•mects for paveouts, revisions, deletions and revisions, in the iLture, requiring additional Engin_ =•ing Design, this vould necessitate a reassessment of the total compensation for the Engineering Design at tLat time. Yours t C V. ` .AR LETO� �CK576D �? n Intl: Letter, date. November 20,1981 - cy - Xk r i1M \.il \ \l\ ril \lil Y11 \IM iii.( \\ I.e. \\\ )\ �.. tp ne•NI$ iili eiil Vol ' `• L.00KWOOD ENGINEERING Bt SURVEYING COMPANY. INC. 300 Wen reel.... sev\eviea. none r aliUa CAUroi.0 $3379 1 b 4nf r)4\l UnO H iAssessment District 79 i November 20,1981 Engineering Services Community Development Department, Engineering Dlvisioa Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Att: LWI'D B. RUBBS, City Engineer Dear Lloyd: Yesterday we talked on the telpbone regarding the work we are doing, designing a portion of the Assessment District 7941 Improvements, in accordance with our Agreement for )Engineering Services, dated May 7, 1981• As you are aware. Ve have ibeen vorking diligently on this, and cooperating vith•your office and the firm of Villdan Associates, -in the coordination of the total project. • Ve have billed Our work monthly, as we have progressed, and this month we will be exceeding the nosey indicated in the original agreement, $ 83,000.00 which ! vas based on what the expected improvemanta would be at that time. The agree - nent also indicates that separate authorization by the City is needed for work in excess of this amount, which was the reason for the call. You indicated that I should advise you of some of :he additional design work that bu been involved Osince our initial meeting, for Justification of the increase. 1. Addition of "S "curves frog 6:b Street North to Old Rochester 2. Addition of curve roadway com acting Old Rachester to Nev Rochester/ 3. Realignment of 6th Street froe a streigbt street, to a reverse curve alignment. 4. Change location of atom dra.•n line 19P fret between lots 44-45 to 40-41. r 5• Addition of storm drain laterals at 'Sixth and Seventh Street i Rochester. _ 6. Revicions of Trademark Storm Drain free Active line to luactive line. 7. Deletions of Cleveland and Milliken Avenues North of 6th. S. Revision of Sixth Street design at Haven to Station 18+36 to ancomodete a later submitted design by L.D. King. I 9. Change Stony Drain Design criteria from San Bernardino County to Moffett - $icols criteriav after our design vna completed. JO.Changc City standards frdm original approved plans of Hillikin and Sixth Streets 11.Prepare a record of survey u requested by Hilldan Associates for their land 4 1 acquision requirements. 12 Prepay several estimates of quantities as project has Seea revised. — These have taken additional time for botb officr design and field survey work, and we have proceeded without question to avoid any bold u .iII the final design. It now appears that the additional work noted above, will run &Taut $ 16,600, a 201 increase from the original estimate, for work and changes required by the City and wiildan, u the scope and criteria have bee, revises durla' the course of our work. It would be appreciated if this will be autborited to avoid any delays y, in the processing of our statements.' Yours truly ,1 CARLETON V. LOGMOOII �•/C ,•�/�\ ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO ' AGREEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN ENGINEERING SERVICES By this Addendum to "Agreement for Storm Draln Engineering Services" entered Into on the 7th day of May, 1931 between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation located In the State of California, County of San Bernardino, herenafter referred to as "CITY" and WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID CIVIL ENGINEERS, with offices looted at 17732 Sky Park Boulevard, Irvine, California 92713, hereinafter referred to as "STORM DRAIN ENGINEER," additional services have been requested by the "CITY" and the "STORM DRAIN ENGINEER" has proposed to complete such services as outlined be low, for a combined total not to exceed thirty -three thousand dollars ($33,000.70). The proposed services to be completed by STORM DRAIN ENGINEER, as referenced by his letter /proposal dated December 21, 19111, is as follows: Drain SD Extensions (Utica and Vincent) 1. Drainage calculations and plans. 2. Topograptdcsurveys. 4 i Drain 19D Extensions (Rochester and AT&SF Railway Crossing) 1. Drainage calculations and plans. 2. Topographic surveys. This Addendum Increases the maximum amount of the agreement from $173,000 to 0203,000. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said parties have executed this agreement on this y —day of , 1932. Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a municipal corporation �... B1't ATTESTt q5 •I i 41 fit rat i .3 I V'e c'(ter- I►\/110 • CONIULTINO CIVIL ENOI NEERb AND LAND SURVEYORS t December 21, 1981 CITY OF Fu:fiCt?C CUCPAIG,4GA COAIMU8lTr DEVE OPMFNT DEPT. Mr. Lloyd Hobbs G1„ 22 1961 Director of Public Works 7 8 9 b II 121 2 I PN City of Rancho Cucamonga V I I I 11 1314 5 S 9300 Baseline, Suite A p Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Lloyds SUBJECTS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 79 -11 OUR JOB NO. 30278 As you requested, we are revising the engineering services being provided to the City on Assessment District 79 -1 to Include extensions of storm dralns SD and 19D northerly of the AT &SF Railway Company tracks In Utica, Vincent _ and Rochester to Jersey Avenue, plus another drain under the tracks to serve the AF&SF property easterly of Milliken. We propue tJ complete these services as Indicated belowt ` • Drain SD Extensions (Utica & Vincent) 1. Drainage calculations and plans $20,000.00 2. Tcpographle surveys 4.000.00 Total Estimated Cost $24,000.00 Drain 190 Extension (Rochester & AT&SF Railway Crossing) 1. Drainage calculations and plans $ 7,000.00 2. Topographic surveys 2.000.00 Total Estimated Cost $ 9,OOD.00 COMBINED TOTALS $33,OOD.00 These drains were not part of the original Master Plan of Drainage approved by the City and, consequent' , were not part of our original proposal and contract with the City. Please take whatever official action is necessary to Y 17782 SKY PARK,BOULEVARD • IPe'N`EE7., C,.ALIJORNIA 92714 • (714) htr. Lloyd Hubbs Our Job No. 80278 • December 21, 1981 Page 2 Increase the maximum amount of our contract from $173,000 to $208,000. So far, we have completed our services for less than the contract amounts and hope to complete all of our services In this manner. With the exception of the extension of Drain 19D In Rochester, our work has been completed and submitted to Jim Sims of Wllidan. We expect to complete and submit the plats .tor this drain prior to the end of the year. Please contact Dave Simpson or me if you have any questions. Sincerely, P Richard R. Schmid jib ecr Jim Sims, WMdar. Associates - Financial n U iire«ti= �i.== �':TS..ri-_ - .ryg -P.. �•�•r— .NS-:s- •.T•.,.�..I.v m .g r ,s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENCANEERING SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER - ' earre.er ro+ Project Manag.-nent, R-O -W Acquisition and r or o. ONE Engineering, Assessmeni E,mineeribg and Coordination, Dale and Improvement Plan Checking 1 2 - 9/82_. a T9 W(Ildan Associates Y Ya ate bepby remieeated to eoaply -ids the (0119- the agreement for engineering services. i )MIFlGT1OR: For changes In the scope of work as described In attached Wllldan fetter dated January 21, 1982 Tkr aewaat 9ltL Can: race- tU'x(tUtkYNq(Iweaudl Bp TDe Sem Ot: Forty-one thousand - - - - -- _ - ---'-- ------- "---- Dollars (f 01,000 00 ) The Cmaact Tabt tAeie9 -_ this and p.eams ch"tt Ordps 010 $1.. One hundred. forty-five thousand -- ------------------- '----- -- -------- - ----D Ibn(f 105)000600 I. The Cultact Perim Provided lie Calplelwa Will Be (tomased) (Dectnsadl (Oachaetedk H/A Days This dacoetat nil become a wppiemeet t0 the cmtpa aad all pr9Nalms n8 apply k*NW Repeated (City of Rancho CUCartanga) (Date) JJ (Director of Public Works) t dOItfMI ��•IV� accryM �T_ Y �i rL (Engineer) (Onto) :i.; �ppte.ed ap (City of Rancho Cucamonga) eta This Information will to used as record of any changes to the original engineering agreement dated May 7, 1991. I .i Ee f S Section F - Compensation 111 (IS 2) assessment Ertgineerltg 525,000 — 4,500 111(3)Right -of -Way Engineering 19,000 -- 23,500 ,. III (6) Project Management 15,000 — 6,500 111 (7) Plan Checking . 4S,00 -- 6,500 i )MIFlGT1OR: For changes In the scope of work as described In attached Wllldan fetter dated January 21, 1982 Tkr aewaat 9ltL Can: race- tU'x(tUtkYNq(Iweaudl Bp TDe Sem Ot: Forty-one thousand - - - - -- _ - ---'-- ------- "---- Dollars (f 01,000 00 ) The Cmaact Tabt tAeie9 -_ this and p.eams ch"tt Ordps 010 $1.. One hundred. forty-five thousand -- ------------------- '----- -- -------- - ----D Ibn(f 105)000600 I. The Cultact Perim Provided lie Calplelwa Will Be (tomased) (Dectnsadl (Oachaetedk H/A Days This dacoetat nil become a wppiemeet t0 the cmtpa aad all pr9Nalms n8 apply k*NW Repeated (City of Rancho CUCartanga) (Date) JJ (Director of Public Works) t dOItfMI ��•IV� accryM �T_ Y �i rL (Engineer) (Onto) :i.; �ppte.ed ap (City of Rancho Cucamonga) eta This Information will to used as record of any changes to the original engineering agreement dated May 7, 1991. I .i Ee J WILLDAN ASSOCIATES ❑ ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS 8t PLANNERS $ps, �� - (�',� r +�xv^a ca+bi :4ca ,orc�.•a ;a+ ?o-r�,� �v Ss off: : o +:..� `�a, \ (y[�" Acma - ,y�Ybe •YA:roftct aryy i' xi7 • '1 January 21, 1982 EXHIBIT A Mr. Lloyd Hubbs City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 97730 Re: Request for Additional Fees - Revised Utsessment District 82 -1; Formerly 79 -1) Dear Lloyc: Please find herein the revised figures for extra services regarding the above mentioned project. Please discard the letter to you dated January 12. The following figures for Project Management, Plan Checking, Assessment Engi- neering and Right -of -Way Engineering are hereby presented for your consid- eration. 1 Project Management (J N 61109) - $6,500.00 1. Anticipate approximately two (2) weeks of additional coordination with Chevron and Chevron's engineers on the design and speci- flcations of the 4th Street Channel Improvements. 2. Anticipate approximately one (7) week of additional coordination with Chevron to facllltate agreements necessary with the City. Included on this estimate Is coordination work with the City of ,+ Ontario In regards to the Milliken }Veil site agreement. 11. Plan Checking (J N 611101 - $6,500 00 ` 1. Anticipate approximately eight (8) more sheets from Chevron for Plan chocking and coordination with the Assessment District's plans :. Anticipate approximately three (3) days of revising and Incorpor- ating estimates and specifications from Chevron Into Asseasment District package. ' HOSPITALITY LANE • SuITE•110 !SAN BERNARDINO. CAUFORNIA 92408 • 14 (7 )824.2123 P:.,�R^ "•T •:..lag, � � - � ,�t'i� asaaaaal� __ham .�^ . M, Mr. Lloyd Hubbs City of Rancho Cucamonga January 21, 1962 Page Two Ill. Assessment Engineering (J.N. 61111) - $4,500.00 The above figure Includes the following Items: 1. The addition of parcel and tract maps wntch : ere not considered incloded In the original bou.idary map. 2 Involvement with Chevron regarding their Impacts on the assess - mcnt proceedings. 3 Major corrections to the spread formula due to paveout and addi- tional rights -of -way acquisitions. IV Right-or-Way Engineering (J.N. 61112) - 4k23,500.00 _ The above figure Includes the following Items: 1. Originally, the proposed fee was on approximately twenty f20) parcels. To this date approximately thirty (30) to thlrty -five (35) parcels are in negotiation. To complete acquisition nsgotlations with ten (10) to fifteen (15) more property owners, excluding Chevron, a proposed Rddltional fee of $12,000 Is requested. 2 As provided for In Section 111-1, Special Services, of our Contract Agreement, extra services were provided In assisting the Inde- pendent appraise: for this project. At -mat fee totaled $3,000. 3 Additional services are now being pe formed in regards to the Milliken Avenuk Well site (City o' Ontario) and the two (2) Chev- ron agreements Additional fees are proposed at $5,000 a. Originally, costs for attending meetings for the project and with the consulting engj. -- were not'ncluded to the proposed fee. It is anticipated that nn addttlomi $3,500 will be needed for the completion of the project. ;r The latter figures mould bring our °not -to- exceed° fee for this project to: 1. Pivject Management $15,000 + $6, SOLI = $21,500 , 1 9 X ■ 4` V F r wa �a p o I Z s RF .� O 3 ° ° o r• r 1 ca V C7 Z Z O LUN Q w U az O w �� to U3' c 69 .r O W LUM (LN r u 4 05 Mr Lloyd Hubbs City or Rancho Cucamonga January 21, 1982 ,.� Page Three 2. Plan Chrckin4 $45,000 + $6,500 = $51.500 3. Assessment Engineering $25,000 + $4,500 = $29,500 t 4 Right-of -Way Engineering $19,000 + $23,500 a $42.500 lr there are any questions regarding this request, please real free to a 11 me at - (714) 024 -2143 Respectfully submitted, WILLDAN ASSOCIATES `y Vincent M. Frasca Vice President; Regional Manager i' VMF /JWS /nc aa�"; iyY.p?r � ^twJM�tY't �A4 °;4• :'.!.��ka�a ,�.. (; y - .-. � •.c. (h iS4�p mr�i%'a�'+^T' — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM April 22, 1982 TO: C,ty Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman/e&_�- City Manager SUBJECT: Council Committee Appointments The following �,,: represents, as best we can determine, the most up -to -date record of Council committee appointments and other assignments which intolve representation of the City locally and regionally. FINANCE COMMITTEE. (review of warrants). This has been a one -year assignment WWI aTiiTi n s eee sated among all councilmembers. Two councilmembers have been assigned to this committee. However, the actual review of warrants has been 5 informally rotated by the two committee members. Councilmembers Frost and - Palombo were appointed to this committee approximately two years ago, PARK AC UISITIOH CO►riITTEE. This committee was established sevaral months ago by the City counci to review perspective park sites and to recoaoend those sites which are consistent with the goals of the city's General Plan. Council - member- Frost and Bridge have served as Council rep - esentatives along with the F, n city manager and director of community services. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS. Haar Hikels has represented the ulty as a delegate to sCAG. Mayor MikeTs was also ed by representative to cities in San Bernardino County to serve on the Erocutive Committee of SCAGO � n SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS. Na rr Hikels has represented the City on 5 th s regiona transportat on coon item. CouncMmemSer Frost has served as the f alternate. OMit TRANS ROARD OF DIRtCTORS. Mayor Mikels has re°r�eented the City on this agency. ounc member Frost has served as the 1't"errt 9 WEST VALLEY TRANSIT AGENCY. Former Councilmember Faldmbo served as the city's �L e egaate end Mayor Mies as tha alternative on th s su - regional transit group which consists of West Valley cities and the cities of Claremont and Pomona. 4 City Council Re: Committee Appointments April 22, 198? Page Two CITY FLOOD CONTROL C011MITTEE. Former Council emb rg Bridge and Palombo served on this coma ttee. gv%e4- 111M ZONE I FLOOD CONTROL COMMITTEE. Th M, ar and r Pro Tem r serve on this unty room ttee. Pr or to s elec a the , uncilmember Buquet served as an appointed member of the committee. That appointment waE made by County Supervisor McElwain, SOIL EROSION AND OUaT CONTROL BOARD. Mayor Mikelsshas�prved as the of I _ yf representative on this Boa a rectors. d �'t"t "0i y Lt FOOTWII_ FREEWAY STUDY COMMITTEE. Traditionally the Havor and Mayor Pro. JJ � represent the City on this commit". Ot e= _m�bers oft qty tountu }, are encourated to participate as well. I, OMIARIO AIRPORT GROUIID ACCESS STUDY COMMITTEE. Mayor ikel, has represented the •C ty on this committee. CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE. By State law, the/NaYoflor or Pro -Tam or represent the City on this committee. \. i CITRUS GELT LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES. All councilmembers are encouraged to atten meet ngs at a trus Belt Division of the League. Councilmember Frost { ' is presently the group's Vice San Bernardino The Citrus gp�: gwi;ton cIlASists a titles from Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. �1'{.•fgr 'A�7 :s;f S U¢-C.� CBMWD MAYORS AND 'RRrESIDN C0 . Although th Rancho Cucamonga Was—no friciT repeentet do TTEE committee, Re Mayor h s been invited to attend meetings If he wishes. This committee sery � eerin_ g pxmt ae to halp determine long -range policy for the district °-t'1 /�w•a PRIVATE - PUBLIC COALITION Th Ma or has represented the city on this newly formed organization . LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES STANDING COSNITTEES. Councilacmber Frost has bean appo Tnted to the League' evenue and Tawatian ComIttee. Former Councilmember Palombo was a member of the Public Safety Comuittee. Appointments to League committees are made by the President of the League or by the Citrus Be!t Division President. If members of the Council are interested in serving on any of the standing committees, we will forward that information to the League sta f. tPA re r s t OW May 20, 1982 CITT OF RANCHO COCA'eONCA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Adjourned Meettna 1. CALL TO ORDER. t r. An adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line goad on Monday. May 10, 1982. The motion was tiled to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor Jan D. Mikels. Present %xre: Councilman Richard M. Dahl, Charles J. Buquat II. Phillip D. Schlosser, Jarea C. Front, and Major Jon D. Kiiels. Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Vasserman-. Coasnity Development Director, Jack lam. 2. BUSINESS. Kayor Mtkels announced that the purpose of cho meeting in to interview candidates for the vacancy which now eziste on the Planning Commission as a -esult of Mr. Dahl's election to the city council. The Mayor indicated that all candidates would be reviewed at this seating, and that a list of flralists would be dater - mined and would be scheduled for interview for Tuesday, May 11, 1982, Mr. Buquec, speaking on behalf of a subcommittee appointed by the Mayor to dater mine the ealection process, announced that each candidate we asked to respond in v -tting to two questions prior to the interview. Each candidate wa limited to 1 ^0 words for the response. In addition, each candidate will have four minutes In vuich to present any materials relevant to his or bar qualifications for the pla..ning commission Eosition. After the city council hag heard each of the candi- dares, each courcllmerber will submit a list of tLree games, set in ranking order: Then names will be reviewed by and circulated among rho members of the city council. Etch ccnncilasbrr will then be asked to submit a list of two names from the re- valuing list of candidotee. If the remrinfng list of candidates In five or less. those Would represent the finallsty to be invited back for a second Interview. If morn than five agree remained after the second ballot, the city council would be sated to submit two namen each in priority ranking. Thereafter, the top five remaining on the list will be asked back for a second and more intense interview. The candidates to be intervieved are (in the order scheduled by the random alphabet draw by the Secretary of State for the municipal election): Peter J Pitanal Robert i Presser Martin P Prieco Larry Thomas McNial Jeffaruon E. Bill, Sr John Allen Hugging Va"da Diann K. Don Drachand Johr D. Dunlap. III Robert Dutton Lewis W Truut Robert Wayne Turner Alen J Tuccinrone Livia Lea Valiance Bruce A. Chides B David Barker James D. Watkins Tail I. Westlotorn Otie R. Stalls Leonard George Soper Carl Pete Stark Dennis L. Stout Raymond B. Stuehraanu Mrs. Peter Rerdikes Orlstopher Carrol Bradlee, P Viiliaer Diane Dyan David P. placket i EW � sFr ,1M.,,±,yy s';Y' "';^"z- •,.a.- _•;•?: -� - .;__',�s••n.JiS`:r:r;cC •City Council Minutes May 10, 1982 Page 2 The city council then Intervlsvad each of the candidates for the position of Planning Commission. Following the interviews, Mayor Mikelm askod each city touncilmembor to submit three names from the total list of cmididstes in no j.•• particular ranked order. Mayor Mikals announced the names of the first group of socl- finalists for the position. They worst Martin Prieaco Bruce Chitiea Leonard Soper Otia Stolle David Flocker Damao Stnut IV Neil Weatlotore Larry McNiel Sheryl Moody Robert Watkins David Barker The Mayor then aekad each member of the city council to write dorm two name - from the above list. Again. In no particular ranked priority. The Mayor tl:an ` announced the names of those who had made the ee�nd )1st. They were: Dennis Stout David Barka. t Larry HcHlel Robert Watklnb Bruce Chides Davin Flocker Neil Westictorn The Mayor then asked each member of the ctty council to 113: his fleet "d satmid choide for the list of finalists to be interviewed on Tuesday evening. Following a tally of the list, the Mayor announced that the four to be Interviewed ware: David Berkey Dennis Stout David Plocker Larry McNiel Following announcement of the finaliata, and a discussion of the Interview pm- cess, ..c •layor announced that each candidate would be sutitled to 3-' =I -nues for an interview by the city council. The city council aubnitted five questions in z advance to each of the final candidates. However, the council may oak questions which were not given to the candidates In welting. i- 3. ADJOUPiolmr. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquat to adjourn to on odjocrned city council meeting on Tueeds), May 110 1932 at 7:00 p.m. In the Lion's Peek Cot®mity Center. Motion carried unaalmously 5 -0. The meeting adjouraad at 10:55 p.m. RespacLfully submitted, Lauren H. Wasserman City Clerk , -�7 May 5, 198 2 L CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONCA , l REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MINUTES 1. CALL TO ORDER. 4 °. A mating of the Redevelopment Agency of tta City of Rancho Cucamonga t.v held In the Lien's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line RoAd on Wednesday, May 5. 1902. The meting vas called to order at 7:09 p.m. by Chairmn Jon O. Hikela Present Weret Agency lhebers Richard H. Dahl, Charles J. Buquet 11, Phillip D. Schlosser, Janes C. Frost, and Chairman Jon D. Mikels. Also present caret Executive Director, Lauren H. Wasseroan; and Camunity ' Development Director, Jack Lon. Approval of Minutest Notion: Moved by Schtosner, seconded by Trost to approve the minutes of April 7 and Aped 21, 1982. Mocien carried ceanlmusly 5-0 with Buquet and Dahl abstaining on the April 7 minutce. 2. STAFF REPORTS. A. PROJCC7 REWINi PROCy9(. Staff report M• Jae► Lam. The Agency Yombers discus ad vaya to review project* vlthta the redevelopment area Mr Frost felt that the tg ncy shoo; -1 see everything at first. Later when i. they determined what vat rourine, they could stop looking at everythlub, A Notion: moved by Prost, seconded by BuQuer to adopt Resolution No. R482 -3. Chairman Mikels opened the meting for public comment. Thera being none, the public portion of the seating was clwsd. Motion carried unanis lusly 5 -0. 3. ADJOUR.`Df@7T. Motion: loved by f:hloeser, secou_ed by Frost to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. :he meting aljourned at 7t20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beverly Au helet Assistant incretary F ray 5. 1582 CITY CP RA.MCI:O CUCAN010- CIV COUNCIL HINVT S Regular Meet,ng + CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga van held in t4a Lion's Perk Community Center. 9161 Buse Line twad an Ue: asday. May 5. 19' -2. The maetleg was called to order by Mayor Jon D. Hikels at 7:35 p.m. h' Present ware: Co,ncilman 21che,' H. Dahl, Charles J Buquet II, Phillip D. S' Schlosser, Jemts C. Yeast, and Mayor Jon D. Hikels. Also present worst City Manager, Lauren H. Was3erma11; City Attorney, Robert Doughertt, Comtmity Development Director, Jack Lam; City Eagineur, Lloyd Hubbst Finance Director, Harty Empty; and Community Services Director, Biel Holley. Approval of Hitutes: Motion: Moved bl Frost, seconded by Schlosser to approve, the minutes of March 17, April 7, April 20, add April 21, 1982. Motion carried unanimoasly 5-0 with Dahl and Buquet abstaining on the March 17, April 7, and April 20, 1982 minutes. 2. ANNOWCEMEM. a. Since formor Councilman Bridge was not present to receive his recognition, Council held his for a future time when hi could be present. Mayor Hikels presented Councilman Schlosser a commendation for serving as the Mayor for the previous two years. t t b. Mayor Hikels presented a Proclamation to Bob Salazar, Chamber of Cammeree i representative, declaring Hay 8 -15, 1952 " Spring Clean Sweep Week in Rancho Mayor Hikels, with the assistance from Mrs. Dahl, Mrs. Buquet, and Mrs. yeast, presented awards to the winners of the poster contest for the Spring Clean Sweep Week. Winners were: Senior Division: First Prize: Debbie Aguayo Second Prize: Chad Burnett Third Prize: Erika Spain end Jonani Tate (tie) Junior Di�isiont First Prize: Janon Idman Sacond Pries: Ready Schadle Third Prize: Starr Shaw and Steptanie Swofford (tie) c. Councilman Frost announced there would be a barbeque on Hay C as part of the Etiwanda Centennial celebration. d. Mayor Mikels presented a report from the Oonitrcma ano- Saabs& _cc&d m etinge. 3. CONSENT CALENDAR. a Approval of Warrants, Register No. 82 -5 -5 in the an.:mt of 9487,525.09. b Alcoholic Beverage Application for Gloria N. and Jnck A. Anderson, Regina Farz+e: Jack's Restaurant, 12892 Foothill Blvd., for on -sale &amoral eating place. c. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Roush P'n and Hyun Hoe Wang, China All-:y, 8270 Foothill Blvd., for on-sale bear and vine eating place. d. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Dina L. and Fabian F. Scarpiao, Jr., Steeples's Lunch Stop, 9631 Business Center Drive, Suite C, for off -sale tear and wine. a. Acceptance of Bonds and Agreement for Minor Director Review 82 -08 - fougher' and Bmgles, located at 82/0 Foothill Boulevard. City Ccuneil Minutes May 5, 1982 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 82 -79 A RESOLUTION OF TINE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVE- MENT AGREEMENT AND IHPROVII03(i' SECURITY FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 82 -08. f Change of Street Name from Center Avenue to Ivy Lane in Tract No. 945E. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING THE NAME OF CENTER AVENUE WITHIN TRACT 9458 TO IVY LANE. g. Easement Agreement with City of O.Iterlo. Recommend approval of casement agree- ment with the City of Ontario to provide right- of-way on Milliken Avenue re- quired for street construction In conjunction with Industrial Assessment Dis- tract. Provision of agreement only effective with District formatf h License Agreammeta with Santa Fe Railroad. Recommend approval of liaemo with railroad assuming responsibility and liability for maintanan,e coo - mtruction of six storm drain crossings to be required by Industrial aaatss- ment District. License is only effective when work is performed. I. Set Public Hearing Date of June 2, 1982 for: Appeal of Planning rbaaiselon Approval for Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract 11893 - m; /L Builders: a custom lot subdivision of 17.2 acres of land into 36 lots in the R- 1- 20,000 and R -1- 12,000 zones located on the mouth side of Banyan, west of Sapphire - APN 1043-411 -01. J. Approval of a Resolution appointing, officers and agents to accept deeds on behzlf of the city RESOLUTION NO. 82 -83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO COCA. NGA, APPOINTING OFIICERS AND AGENTS TO ACCEPT DEEDS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion carried ananlmausly 5-0. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 4A. ZONE CHANCE FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO 81 -08 (TT 11928)- EHAFFP.R /WESTLAND VEMO E. A proposed plauned development of 67 tcvnhouae ,alto oa 5.85 acres of land located on the north aide of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Aver is - APN 201 - 251 -32 Mr Waseorman stated that the from had been continued In order for the residents and developer coxQd meet. That meeting had taken place. Mayor Mikels opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressira council were: Ken Kerner. developer. He stated that the homeowners had ngreed to he asked Philip Marcacci to join him so they could address this to- gather Mr. Ketner stated that smut the homeowners ws red to see was for this acreage to be divided in half (from Archibald Avenue, the southerly boundary of Highland, the northerly boundary of Lemon, and proceed easterly towards the Alta Loma Channel) -- somewhere at the half -way point the homeowners want to see a maximum of 8 unite from Archibald to the halfway point, and a maximum of 10 units from the half -vay point to the wash. The homeowners felt this would be a good City Council Minutes May 5, 1982 Page 3 ' buffer from the single fondly to townhouse style �f living. The homeowners also requested that the systems development fees collected F' be used specifically for the improvement of the intersection. Mr. Nareacei stated that the hoenovnote had no disagreement with the proposal which Hr. Ratner mar• by increasing the density from the single family dwellings toward the wash. He stated that Hr. Re net s will be requiring an additional piece of laud, the railroad spur, which • will also bring the density down. Although they had no objections to his plans they did want the systems fees to go specifically for the improvement of the intersection. Council asked Mr. Lm how to make the procedural change as recotuaeaded by the homeowners. Hr lam stated that there was an ordinance before council tonight for second reading to change the zone to R- 2 /P.D. The proposal is for 59 units on 5.85 acres; or a density in excass of 10 unite per acre. There must be a new first reading of a new ordinance to change this to R- 3 /P.D. This would require the ordinance before them to be changed back to the R -3 /P D. and give it a na. first reading. Than council must make a motion to reconsider the first twtion made a number of months ago to tie a condition to the tentative map and development plen that it shall not exceed 9 units per acre. 'There most also be a second reading of On ordinance. Regarding the railroad property, there must be the process for rezoning w•.th advertising hearing schedule and this most be heard by the plann:.ng commission. If property is included in this that had never been Included in the legal advertising befora, than one most go through the planning commission for public hearing to rezone that with a recommendation to the city council. Discussion followed between Hr. Kerner and Council an t: .%a �jrst way to proceed without involving a lengthy public hearing pzo, ess. DSacusalon also included the using of the systems development fees. _ Hr. lam stated it was becoming very complex. The beat solution would be to concentrate only an the one project and not on anythinb else. Therefore, what is required is: (1) take new first reading of tha ordinanca •rich the appn - prints changes to R -3, (2) come back in two weeks for second reading. (3) make motion to reconsider the former motion limiting the project to 9 units per acre to the new density an/ . set that for public hearing in evo weeks. The second reading of the ordir.nco will be at the same time in two weeks. Hr. Kerner stated that regarding the extra land, If it were all right with the homeowners, tie would simply ecgaire it and U.adscape it. Mr. Lam stated he could come back at a later time an that sliver of land. Sheryl Matdy as ted if it were not the Planning Commission wh• had'cecommanded some month, ago c+ use the systems development fee for the ' ntersection. Mr. Dahl concu red that it was since he was an the planning com:asian at that time. Mrs. Moody pointed out that it was not a recommendation of the homeowners, but simply a reatatenent of what the planning commission had recommended. Hr. I= stated that during the discussion m both projects near the 19th and lachibald intersection, there was a concern about the jog in the intersection. Lveryono's concern was that they vented to make certain that the jog was fixed. Mhat staff indfccted, and would continua to indicate, that before any development occurs there, staff will assure that somethi -g is done at the intersection to have it trrrccted. What happens is gettio„ the cooperation of each dovelopor to do something with that intersection, fix it, and that fix will become a cre.lit an their systems dcvolopmmn fee. Hr rezone stated that he would go on record that he had no problem In doing whatever he could with he systems deve3opment fee to make It work. They would "slat the city in watever way they could to fix the intersection. Mr. 11-squat expressed concern about the use of the systems development face since he felt there would be other dovelrpers %-he would want to use ouch fees go to-- . •t City Council Minutes Hay 5, 1982 Page 5 r� Hr. Buquat asked Captain Wickum if he had been involved with this project and if he had any concerns regarding the proximity and location of the project. Captain Wickum stated he had not seen the project before He stated that large projects like this could become instant alums. He felt it would not be fair for him to comment further. ,} Mr. Buquat asked if he felt there would be any problems with the project being just north of 26th Stoat. Captain Wickum stated that North Tow has about 1500 residents; about 1420 of the people are fine people. Only about 40 to 60 people who have in the past caused some problems. He staced they had a fairly goad handle on that, and therefore did not anticipate any problems. x: w Mr. Vairin stated that a member of the Sheriff 'a Department. r'nes eft on the growth management review committee, and additional securitT measures had been discussed at some length for the project. Things such as dead bolt locks, window locks, etc. had been incorporated into the conditions of approval. There being no further public response, Mayor Mikels closed the public hearing. There being no further council dinemseion, Mayor Mikels not May 19 for second reading of the ordinance. 4C. VACATION OF UNNECESSARY STREETS AND ALLEYS WITHIN THE VICTORIA PROTECT. Staff bad recommended that the item be continued to June 2, 1982 when the tract maps are submitted for final approval. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquat to continue to June 2 Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 5. CITY MANAGER'S STAID REPORTS. Mr. Ism road Resolution No. 82 -81 in full. RESCLUTION NO, 82 -81 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANONGA, CALIFORNLI, STATING. COUNCIL POLICY REINFORCING AND CLARIFYING THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN LAND USE POLICIES FOR THAT PORTION OF THE CITY BORDERED BY THE CITY LIMIT ON THE EAST AND NORTH, HAVEN TO THE WEST, AND BANYAN TO THE SOUTH. Mayor Mikels opened the meting for public input. There being none, the meeting was closed for 'anther public Snout. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquat to adopt Resolution No. 82 -81. Councilman Frost stated there were unique situations coming up where the 20,000 square feet would be overly restrictive. However, that doesn't figure as an opposition to the resolution at this time. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. 5B. APPROVAL OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ON THEIR MORTGAGE BOND PROGRAM. Staff report by Tin Sending Mayor Mikels opened the mcating for public input. . it : City Council Minutes May S. 1982 Page 4 impro a the intareections adjacent to their properties. Ile felt perhaps we nigh be establishing a precodant. There being no further public ra®ont, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Buquei to uphola the appeal in part by modifying the development plan -and tentative tract map to change the density to a total of 59 units on the 5.85 acres, plus the ndditional conditions to increase the visitor parking within the development, doors an the garages, and other condi- tions an agreed to previously, cod to condition the developmont plan and tenta- tive sup respectively. and to refer the design to the Design Review Committee for design review and approval. Motion carried ,manimoaa1y 5 -0. City Clerk Wesserman rand the title of Ordinance No. 165 as corrected for the new first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 165 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBMt 201- 252 -32 FROM R -1- 10.000 TO S -3/ PD FOR 5.85 ACM nr.:vaerry LOCATED ND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHLAND, EAST OF ARCHIBALD. Motion: Moved by Buquat r�conded by Frost to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 165. Motion carries aanimouely 5 -0. Mayor Nikels set the second reading of Ordinance No. 165 for May 199 1982. A change o[ rote from R -1 (singls fanny residential) to R- 3 /P.D.1(es""p a family resldential /pinnned development) and the development of 44 patio home and 322 townhouse unite on 35 acres of anu in the R -1 -one located on the south aide of Arrow, between Tutner and Center Avenuen - APN 209 -091 -059 06, and 07. - City Clerk Wasserman ruad the title of Ordinance No. 175. ORDINANCH NO. 175 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ^.ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONIIG ASSESSOR'S PARCBL HUMBER 209 -091 -05, 06, 07 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW, BETWEEN TURNER AND CENTER AVENUES FROM R -1 TO R- 3 /P.D. Notion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Frost to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 175. Motion carried tnanimoualy 5-0 Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Mayor Mikel• opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council vas: *Norman Raid, project manager, for Mayer Corporation. He encouraged council to approve the zone change, and stated he was present to answer any queations ti� � City Council Minutes May 5, 1982 Page 6 There being no comments, Mayor Hikels closed the meting. Motion: Moved by Schlosser, samaded by Dahl to approve Reaolution No, 82 -82 • and vaiving the entire reading Notion carried unanimously S -0. City Clark Waesernan read the title of resolution No. 82 -82. RESOLUTION NO. 82 -82 C �i A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN HOUSING FINANCE REVLNUE BOND PROGRAM IN COOPERATION ViTB THE COUNTY OF SAN BrawmarnNO AND AUTHORIZING TH. ' MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ESECUTE FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A COOPERATIVE AGREE- . NEXT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. SC. ADDENDUMS TO DESIGN CQNTRACT9 FOR INDUSTRIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. 82 -1. Lloyd Hubbs presented the staff report. Mayor Hikels opened the mating for public input. There being none, the meting was closed Notion: Moved by Buquety seconded by Schlosser to approve the addanduxa to the design contract With Willdan Aaaocla:ns, Rockwood Engineer, and Williamson and Schrld for Assessment District No. 82 -019 and to authorize a loan to the Assess - mn• District. No. 82 -01 in the amount of $93,000 to be drzon from Storm Drain an, stems Development funds. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Mikela called a recess at 9:05 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 9:23 p.m. with all cambers of the Council and staff present. 6. CITY COUNCIL ITEMS. 6A. COUNCIL COMMITTER APPOINIHENTS. 7 The Council made the following appointments, Etivanda Specific Plan Representatives - :rest, delegate/Dahl, alternate. Finance Committee - Schlosser and Buquet. r %rh Aequlsltion Committee - pros[ and Dahl. Southern California Association of Governments - Mikels, delegate /Schlosser, alternate. San Bernardino Associated Governments - Mlkels, delegate /Frost, alternate. Owrltrann Board of Directors - Frost, delegate /Hikels, alternate. Nest Valley Transit Agency - Frost, delegate /Dahl, alternate. City Flood Control Committee - Frost and Dahl. Zone I Flood Control Committee - Hgor and Mayor Pro Tem. Steil Erosion and Dust Control Board - Schlosser, delegate /Frost, alternate. Foothill Freeway Study Committee - Frost, delegate /Buquaty alternate It Ontario Airport Ground ACLC99 Study Committee - Mikels, delegate /Schlosser, alternate. 2 tC eD City Council Minutes Hay 5, 1982 , page 7 City Selection Committee - Mayor and Mayor Pro Tom. Citrus Bait League of California Cities - Float, :elogate /Buquet, alternate. CWWD Mayors and Presidents Committee - Mayor and Mayor Pro Tom. Private- Public Coalition - Mayor and Mayor Pro Tom. Trails Committeo - Dahl, delegate /Front, alternate. Advisory Commission: there were two vacancies: One for Faye Stamper and sue for Chuck Buquet. Mr. Boquat felt council should look at the attendance problems and make sure any new appointees vere wiling to serve. M- Dahl recommended that the ordinance be bit ght back to council for review w determine ways to improve and strengthen the Cn, and to disc•:ss this at the second meeting is Jrme. lntercieva of Planning Commissioners: Council set the prescreening on Monday, May 10, and the final interviews to be held on Tuesday, May 11 Both d- -s at 7 :00 p.m. Council will decide on the 11th wizen to acnounce appointments. Councilman Frost suggested that two members of the council be selected to come y up with some proc, tires and a format for the interviews. Mayor Mikels selected Mr. Frost and Mr. Buquet to work on this. Mr. Dahl requested that the tatter regarding Architecture and /or Design Revisit Committee be set for council consideration at tha Juno 16 meeting. 7. CITY A'FrOAM 1s REPORTS. Mr. Dougherty stated there was need to call en Executive Session followiuq the meeting to discuss sumo potential litigation against he city. K e. ADJOURNMEW. t Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Buquet to adjourn to an executive session to reconvene nt 7 :00 p.m. on May In. 1962 at tte Lion's Park Comm:nity Center for Planning Comission intarvie:na. Motion carried unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 10:1! P.M. I . -, Respectfully submitted, (P Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk 'i .t 4