No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/03/05 - Agenda PacketMY of RANCHO 1CV AMQVGA CITY COUTI. AGENDA Liona Park Conuunity Center 9161 Base Line goad laccho Cucamonga, Califoraia All items submitted for the City Council Agenda rat be in oritaog. The deadline for submitting these its" is SsOO p.n oa the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clark's Office rserivas all each items. A. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. B. Roll Calls Wright Buquet _, Mikels Dahl _, and King _. C. Approval of Minutes: None Submitted A. Thursday, March S. 1966 - 7:00 p.m. - HISTORIC PRESERVA7I08 COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. B. Wednesday, March 12. 1966 - 7:00 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION - Lions Park Co=aity Center. 9161 Base Lion Road. (This meeting has been cancelled.) C. Thursday, March 20, 1985 - 7:00 P.M - CITY COUNCIL - Lioos Park Commuaity Center, 9161 Base Line Roan. (There vill be no meeting on March 19, 1986.) D. Thursday, March 20, 1986 - 700 p.m. - PARR DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIOH - Lions Park Community Center. 9161 Bus Line Road. City Council Meeting -2- March S, 1986 B. Thursday, March 27, 1986 - 700 p.m - ADVISORY COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center. 9161 base Line Road. P. Presentation of a Procl&ouion commawratiog Arbor Day, 1986. G. Presentation of a Proclamation to the Spanish Trail& Girl Scout Council proclaiming March 10 - 16, 1966 as "Girl Scout Week ". 3__Q9K The following Conant Calendar items era "peered to be routine and non controwersinl. They will be acted apon by the Coaacil at one time without discussion. A. Approval of Warrant @, Register No's. 3 -5 -66 and Payroll 1 ending 2 -20 -84 for the total amount of $1.28$,321.20. B. Alcoholic Buverage Application No. AS 86 -02 for On -Sale 5 Beer d Wine Rating Place License, The Cub, Donald, Carolyn, Michael mad lathy Dayam, 8411 Foothill Ooulcvsrd. C. Alcoholic Beverage Application No. AS 86 -03 for 7 Off -Sale Boer A Wine gating Place License, 7-31 "on Food Store (2135 - 25714), Southland Corporation, 8081 Archibald Avenue. D. Approval to forward Claim (CL86 -13) against the City by 9 Jeannette Johnson for autocabile damage on Cavan Avenue, 1 block North of Foothill Boul ward to insurance carrier. B. Approval of contract agreement (CO86 -08) with John 30 Francis for legal services to ostablieh a non - profit foundation for the City's cultural neater and other community enhancement purposes. P. Approval of gnviroamental Assessment and General Plan 15 Amendment 86-OIA - Dawkins. City Council Meeting -3- Hatch 5, 1986 RESOLUTION 50. 86 -46 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 07 THE CITY OF RAMCGO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. APPROv ING GENERA. FLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-OIA - WAKINS RDjUST•NG AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF TEE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2-4 DU /AC) TO LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DU /AC) FOR 13.55 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED OR FERON BOULEVARD EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVZHUE - APE 209 -055 -02, 03. 6 14 G. Approval to award Turner Avenue Improvement Project 34 Contract to Vance Corporation, Invest, responsible bidder for bid amount of $173,676.75. R. Approval to award North Two Phase IV Improvement 36 Contract to Val Path 6 Sons, Invest, responsible bidder for bid amount of $153,832.41. 1. Approval to accept improvements at Base Line and 39 Hermosa (Tract No. 11350 Cooperative Agreement with Lowy Development), authorize final payment and direct City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and release performance surety ($420.000.00) sad retention ($8,574.81) and accept Maintenance Bond ($21,000.00). RESOLUTION NO. 86-48 49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TEE P7BLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR BASE LINE AND HERMOSA (TRACT 11350 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WIIH LOWY DEVELOPMENT) AID AUTHORIZING TOE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK J. Approval to accept Appraisal Rapor: to estimate the 50 fair matiat price of the property and the portion vbicb is proposed to be acquired for right -of -way in conjuaction vitb Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing videning oo Archibald Avenue north of Basu Line Road. In applying to the Federal Government for funding of the proposed arrest sad railroad crossing videning, the City is required to formally revive, approve, and accept said appraisal report. RESOLUTION NO. 86-49 52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE PROPOSED RIGRr -OF -WAY ALONG THE EAST 810E OF ARCBIJALD AVENUE WORTH OF THE SOOTHUR PACIFIC TRATSPORTATION COMPANY RAILROAD City Council Meeting -4- March 5, 1986 K. Approval of Maps, Imprwnnent Agreements, and 53 Improvement Securities for Tract Nos. 12642, 12935, 36, 37. 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 and 43 located in the Caryo Planned Community submitted by Kaufman and broad of Southera California and Marlborough Development Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -50 144 A RESOLUTION OF TOE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPR07IRC IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS. IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT MOS. 12642, 12935, 36. 37. 38. 39, 40. 41, 42 AND 43 L. ApHrwal of Tract Map. Improvement Agreement and 146 Improvement Security for Tract No. 13131 (D.R. 85 -17) located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue submitted by Robertroo Homes, a division of Cawil Corporation. RESOLUTION NO. 66 -51 155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13131 M. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 156 Security for Tract No. 12337 -1 (Vista Grove Avenue only) located on the east aide of Hermosa Avenue at the north City Limits submitted by First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Sam Gabriel Valley and releasing the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security submitted by Dick Scott. Inc. for Tract No. 12337 -1 (Vista Grove Avenue only). RESOLUTION NO. 86 -52 163 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCZ OF IHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 110. 12337 -1 AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMGIT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECUPITY APPROVED ON AUGUST 17, 1983 City Council Meeting -5- March 5, 1986 B. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 164 Security for Tract No. 11793 located on the east aide of Ametbyst Avenue, between Highland and Leman Avenues submitted by Peunfield Boman - Alta Loma, a joint venture. RESOLUTION 50. 85 -53 174 A RESOLUTIOM OF TUB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI:f OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ACREEKFMT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 11793 0. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement 175 Security for Tract Na. 11932 located on the north side of Pinch, between Boodol• and Raven submitted by C.T.R. Incorporated. RESOLUTION 80. 86 -54 190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND PINf7. MAP OF TRACT NO. 11932 P. Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion. 191 Levis Bnmes — F.N. 7349 — located on iWatoe at Y -11 Faithful Performance Bond (Landscape 6 Street Lights) 425,000.00 IeterMetro Industries Corp. — P.N. 8280 — located ao the southeast earner of Hellman and Arrow Maintenance Guarantee Bond 9 9,615.00 Q. Approval of Professional Services Agreement (CO86 -09) 192 with CIA Engineering Consultants for slurry sealing and heater remis paving of various residential streets PY 65 -86, Phase II. R. Approval of Terra Vista "Nastsida" Park Conceptual 212 Development Plan. S. Approval of Parcel Map 8787 located on the soutb aide 214 of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue submitted by Highland —Haven Associates. City Council Meeting -6- March 5, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 26 -55 216 A 3ESCLOIIOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPR071M PARCEL MAP 8787 (TENTAIIVE PARCEL MAP 8787) I. Approval of the award of engineering contract for 217 construct'on drevings to Purkiss -Rose in the amouut of $29,500.00, for the Bermos& Park Development Project. 0. Set public bearing for March 20, 1986 - Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Preliminary Statement of Community Objectives. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSFS9M2MT ABU yI T RIA PLANNED COMMUNITY 218 AMENDMENT 63-01 - THE WILLIAM 110 COMPANY - A request to attend the Planned Community tart for tb• victoria Planned Community to allov commercial RV storage and mini- varebouse In the Medium High (MR) Residential District. ORDINANCE 80. 287 (second reading) 274 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 85 -01. TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO A1LOW A RECREATIONAL C_..ICLE STORAGE LOI WITH MINI- WARSHOUSE IN TUB MEDIUM -HIGH (NH) OR HIGH (I) LAND USE CATEGORY AND TO ALLOW ITS OPERATION ON A COMMERCIAL FOR RENT BASIS OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC B. AMENDMENT TO AMNREATrOp Awn nrvWMm.w. .r...u..... - Amendments to existing agreements relative to Properties located between the extensiou of Bao7an •venue and Highland Avenue on the north and south, and between the extension of Rochester and Milliken Avenues on the east and vest - APR 225- 141 -08. 12 -19; 225 -151 -01 through 03, 07, 08, 10 -13. City Council Meeting -1- March 5, 1986 ORDINANCE NO. 288 (second readier) 278 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVISC. AN AMENDMENT TO THE ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF R7MCHO CJCAPiNGA AND THE CARYN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, FAOFMAN AND BROAD LAND COMPANY AND MARLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION RELATIVE TO PROPERTIES LOCATED BETWEEN THE EXTENSION OF BANYAN AVENUE AND HIGHLAND AVENUE ON THE NORM AND SOUTH. AND BETWEEN TUB EXTENSION OF ROCHESIER AND MILLIKEN AVENUES ON IHE EAST AND WST - APO 225 - 141 -08, 12 -19; 225 -151 -01 THROUGH 03. 07. 08, 10 -13 ORDIHANCE 30. 21B ( secocd readio3) 279 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 5.04 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BUSINESS LICENSES D. ENVLROMMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND DEVE.OTMENT CODE AMENDMENT 284 86-OI - CITE O^ RAnern n.CAy.mr.6 - An amendment to Title 17. Revisions /Modifications, Section 17.02.0706, Development Reviev. Section 17.06.01OG and 17.06.0206 regarding language changes and additicos. (Continued from 2119/86 meeting) ORDINANCE NO. 284 (second reading) 288 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85 -03, AMF801W: TITLE 17, REY IS IONS /MODIFICATIONS SUCTION 17.020.070B AND NEW APPLICATIONS FOLLOWING DER IAL OF SECTIONS 17.060.0300 AND 17.060.0206. OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE E. PARK AND RECREATION LAND DEDICATION ORDINANCE syENDyENj - Proposed amendments to Chapter 16.32 of the Reecho Cucamonga Municipal Code pertaining to the dedication of Park and Recreation Land as a condition of subdivision. (Continued from December 18, 1985 seating - Park Development Commission requests this be continued to April 2, 198u greeting in order for Commission to continue reviewing Ordinance.) City Council Nesting -8- March 51 1986 ORDINANCE 80. 105D (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF TRH CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SUBSECTION 8 OF SECTION :6.32.030 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATIVE TO PARE AN D RECREATIONAL LAND DZOICATION REQUIREMENTS p. ENVIgosmENTAl. ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL A_RFA SPECIFIC 290 PLAN AMENDMENT 85 -05 - CITT OF RANCHO CDCAMMCA - An Amendment to the Industrial Area Specific Plan to add Research and Development /Office use to the Haven Avenue Overlay District. (Continued from January 15, 1986 mating) ORDINANCE R0. 249A (first reading) 315 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 85 -05 IN ADDING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT /OFFICE USE TO THE RAVED AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT By AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 249 C. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 10. 27 116 FOR TRACT NO, 12650 -01 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0, 1. RESOLUTION 90. 86 -56 322 A RESOLUTION Of TBE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. ORDERIBC THC YORK IN CONVECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 27 30 LANDSCAPE MAINTROANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENCYNEWS REPORT FOR TRACT 110. 12650 -1 1, WA is City Council Meeting -9- MercD 3, 1986 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -57 351 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMORGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE WORE IN CONNECTION WITH ANEKATION NO. 14 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. I AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 11853, 12922, 12801 -2. 12650 -1. D.R. 84051 AND PARCEL MAP 9318 AND 9304 RESOLUTION NO. 66 -58 353 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING 183 WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNERAIION E0. 12 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT HU. 2 AND ACCEPIING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12922, 12801 -2. 12650 -1. D.R. 84 -51 AND PARCEL MAP 9318 I. ORDERING TPE WORK IN CDNIIRCTIOM WITH ANNEXATION NO 26 355 POR IRAGi NOS_ 12810. 10210, 12801 -2. 12914,_I2922,AD 11E99�TO LARDSCAPR MAiRTERANCE DIRTKI 7 N0.1 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -59 371 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RASC80 CUCAMOOCA. CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE 11061 IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 110. 26 TO LASDSCAPE MALPTEMANCE DISTRICT D0. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12830, 10210. 12810 -2. 12914. 12922 AND 11853 J. REPROGRAMMING OP Go Tr DEVELOPMENT E OM GRANT 373 FUNDS. RESOLUTION 80. 86-60 377 A RESOLUTION OF TSE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. RSPROCRAl01DNC FONDS FROM THE 1985/86 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM City Council Meeting -10- March S, 1986 A. UIROVAL OF ESTARLISEMENT OF SPEFD LIMITS ON HILLSIDE 378 ROAD, CFr)R,:H _STRHET. SAN BERNARDINO ROAD AND VICTOIIIA AVENUE. CRDINANCE NO. 289 (first reading) 3.9 AC ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANOHGA, CALIFORNIA. SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO COCAMOSGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS APPROVAL A. OF CUCAHONGL CALIFORNIA iT.n OF TOR CITY OF RANCHO .1 DETERMINATIONS MID DECLARING IF13MT TO TnqUE REFUNDING BONDS AND APPROVAL OE CONSULTANT COMnACTS FOR BOND COUNSEL Al M FINANCIAL CONSULTANT RESOLUTION NO. 86-61 392 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITT COUNCIL OF IHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. MAKING PRELIMINARY DETERMIMATIOMS AND DECLARING INIENTION TO ISSUE RMMNDING FORDS FOR A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. AND ORDERING A REPORT THEREON E. CONFLICT VIII' URGE 19 COUNCIL MEETING. 394 C. REDDEST TO MEET IN ErE nTIV. S SSIOH REGARDING PENDING 395 LITIGATION. A. CONSIDERATION OP APPOIRTIRC CITY COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE(S) TO ItEVIEV MATS^" PERTAIRIEG 7O ADVISORY COMMISSION. City Council Meeting —11— March S, 1986 A. Adjourn to regular testing of City Council scheduled for March 20. 1986 (instead of Marsh 19). y�neoa�srurnle.ua Wesuooie. •ui•: W+°I r�`.•.°..Y. i�°..o.Sr '!. i Ni YVOrlONOnpn D••N mmObY!••WpmdOJNO YWmMNmp �nnpnnpnn �in Q�nntnnnnnmsmommrosw)> >ra >r> CC 00 O•+ 2 STa>Y)r� =mm )- a +T.nnn {(fin /�•<• snr�.•awln>SCP.•. • S Sr NTm n�JT PP P -•mn >r Y»> Z'O > <•f N�i<.- rn/•ww . e•Nr� q DD D•+ °1 bss z c aPa >T+•n) N rmn rrrroocm>r 000�m�rnanr•oTr�oe. m nw• znnns�yT� >iiiiz.•�>•=ib iNCm ^�. Ti zvh 4yfjz m. � 22rmr> (f L. scTe ziN�cz+F•T riznNinz Nr }tir} un- A•o^ii 5 5S000'n?�°P�` >mD.s nN�nVATm ? ? ???DaI.ONNNmO�r2mCNii�N �itlo i^� iw : >iaia3w•a �.. �`s ovz.INnagno� I maa�p oa xeF++^�zo��iTa '"� r oN�Nyr °zm OON G• o yw °aNa +•ao `+ nN.z• ° y � rY`n r3 g < n rnN O O nT`+ M42 SO a I I I ) rn ^� sass a app Nln �00 g� e VN I M, nn s T a t+ r ;P. i mN 0 Ar oa ~y 9O a !^ /i +• Pei a + a X °ani„ p nnp P+r nnnni r P ss+D 'rT .zr.FTr•AT4 o • �s ..n. N as �ii aaa ar. i wl uz • Y•rr. T D �T Pj N T -� ~•rw a N to pmeooeeao oe eo°CCeoeoob000 gyp•. yy.. T�PpP�PP�e �P C�C���jjjj1111 PPPP PPPyPwP IN a�IP el�N�O.�el••P M{>�NraiOY�pj II �I rally �.°.: •.{s sl .Ipr e�.-Nyrow I(�1o. w •a !e eY PY ou�.l• oE�G�a•-1 .Lii�ai�ain�o °ol ww�o oo °iii uol i I i i I i 1 P 1 1 1 I o �-j I a 1 N i 1 1 I i t w 2 n n C :r i e Fit •__ ..._.•_ yLy1. f __•— _ —_ it —_ _ , JurO�rOrJMWrN r.p F. ardP «r «dmry4.11d P�ydPNN d VdN }f i., }pf }pUNNdfuWrrG yV,r YPY, °,.,P yNNryNd JdNNdNMryM «rwyYmVm�INryOP«VYVadY« 19 I I> iip}S�O OrI..y Y'J1 ^mpLV it .n rTiwTT0000 =L AnnnPm Ce2 i'I'�OKw- C,O ^N> fl rDr2Z_LMyyyy OTm PrN Nlt9.D.I ^•p�f_I.O1�rTTL ^ ^I -. ~ >N SCSOK> � OY1A�a2T�>Yer ' 3° >I`. GTT m^T. nmKn °PO. g�LYr ^T y «�„ ZSI]Tr •Ot TT i y Y mt O Z > NrSDDwr 1 r f�Y1 S r k mm'r DY r.l p.,TO O r T-> T .N Yml r-3N O R<`"; _u <Ar S HrT T-1 n b R1>n/1 >92 rC �O i�oPTYmro 4ma FiTn€ acY�<M �aN<i mn no ni a I FKY a y ° 8- v-Ti N n li vo : � .• cv a Y F .r. n �• n o r a ry' n i 0 r An�m$�TY�I°I�s .i.TF mil°..awc �� °Garli..N i"i ��i an1n a.. - «D II k �o -v ":$ vi�.l_ � sl^•«^ ��i a «I 'I.�..nw aNrc>i °yxonT it T•5'�'! 'aeo n >L II1 as}�^>v is 91ni1 gn •.a DA pp t-. F °t]Z.�rO y1 <STIII°�pT TyMO TT �N 1 ° yT ymy ODD >O�i DAyw yFrO �+ ny�(1� n Qpo( I,Tj, 9 <DNrO OOrm11 Y 1n IFII >zn n r Illlllr....�.'lll NrOTyZZr ZT�=i "P4 2 �j�Y'>Y:.rDn wi nC MrNL »TODC M"n•I� r.N..�.i NN nZi n : few :pD al "i -- nii^Zr t -n�f[i 1 li `TO -AszT M1 N�v.nPsB nNACn2RnOinY mi1Ln1)i flAn " �Dr bye Gr„..rr.l °r bi•O .(..I r2i, jj°rwa...a,.°.n n �i yyoo TPOp r o> N DL•N i { rwYw _r a.°i rJ Or 2 2 IyTnPS S <T A NJ i AZ{!� A� DD�AA D D 'ny °r I T In T6 iriww TINw Y � po eoe�m I enoem eDm00000 oo'o oDOODbDeomDaoo eD n �yPyY! yy!!l�y+l!lPIPPPPlp Wy« JrF1M yP1!!PlpP!• P Y.- eJ-1 Fa Pyy !! PP !�. !�� Iii > '1 Y + NN NY �.I }VmrO OY'. wl.�ilNr�am OOODO000 O }pu }ra dd�a•I�Oy PN,i4N�0�. lM Yl.�wf W�.IrepP � W. 1 I 1 A I I II > NO r N} J FP rF j� +N O }O-1rw !1{1 I��OIPUONOOY n d4N N r.}.I N� -• L! II p m fl k I I LP -'� � }Y O :� }O oerwo ),IM• PPI4ti OOrN�rO d «�l.+j,y rPO d 1' N � roe oabiz�asc:��,o1•:�o,e�sGSsP O °i��a4 I I I � i I � VYV��Ciu «Y P.ONN « «MNW /y. .pN�P.eJJJJU.pN SJ1O N.y .p � Y N7.IM �I.,. eYNH MNNApPNOVpO «O «NVPYierVNNJONVPJNV 19 1 .1 <Pwr yrOYON«... I y U •wNNM1'p DrymA TD >9'T FTy999°Oti32r{. ^TS 2mTmTT woe. min �m9aa -eiva m e>pz: 9err ,n.. mrO�r ^ «na °O y= .(mlr3>CTrNpN3rN 2 i�z%zz± o�Nelno>sm >o a oenn N9innm a >� ^A. w oOObflO ► °Mi °� -1 9T An ° «zs r.IiNUY..=•7�z `C'=O Ia. ,>AY a ia>ry a -. sim « >nrnz r�.n iNii Pmmmmm pzr i noe000 S ^ =23�Y2 `V1 C �ossso •OYUMiP'in 3niMMSVwQ .e mw=2r J�f=atiTSm �r.='L yy mr`a yy r- �NCm.9m nr^ 'm 1•�T< >iTOmrly <e >N mar` zvam Z.F e4 �« nti >Mm IA fi Tm lli Nln sR CSd >} Q N�N ay gI n> !i s wo i ml n�nnnnn n n''IZ nnnMj+ ti• ° c p, , ° i�r asLL al s � ay aiw M�MFAN� NI N � rNrmSe nl r m al rl �I oe000e oeoee eeo�000000 oponoolo P !!y!!�PlflyPyJ PlPIMPYPflIfPP Pl Pf f►POYC6MOMp4e1 ~�JJJiJyJJ ~rY.~.. I PNJWNr�p J e,yf wMVNr•O SP.If WJWNrOCPu I �fW6�Y JlYVaY Nw Y i N «I ou «uTaM f.. aNir!$[+ ru�aoMrWSOOwr aJlio u el j'l., .•IP a'p a.1��01MJ O J !o aJpWOpY +-IOJOo I I I I I I I I I 3 i i : .Igo I..N^ _ m i -1 >z m+ n v000 iF r, .-I PIP J 1 a iey! Ij 2 A 1 > I! • 9 Dy O II y y II °oao °OO �i I i i I I I i L I yO�r�VrPVYnONrwYM�yN .pN 9•.O Yti1PJ�YyOPYVVV I I I , nD'MITem. astrnzm F-2NYaµa mnrt +�rzamin4xmtz 4 � ' I N aTPMO<Ti.q +e ='In nT 3 �Cn�OTQ�Y3iiofyf �i �m 3 T j M m�n� rj mON • I I n �+I a�z aiiw a' as j neweeoL0000000•pp0000 lr jlylVPyPPP!!!!lyVyP wwOObAaYM4rYMy� P!h j I ; !N♦uNrOOw4PN V.Y N�Orl�, I II I I P wan4�ruQ.Y O'J Ci�V NP�+wO I pWO.IHP„yNrONI.e �,r • YY UP +YN•,O1NO.�I.w OY�OJY♦ Y NPNONpNIwOOtiw00 O.OlO I I I I I j I I I I I i I I I I j j I � I I , y ■ n I> Iv M 1^ , �m P 1 r L i T° a 1 r i °n a i z 0 _ e^ a f z I 2 i a Nn a m COPY>._.- - Nw. wFr rw r rr r /�.w APSUCAINK.OBI.ALCON000 /YVWM LKO"I) T« Ot3«r.ew N AkO,44t {nrFM Csowt1 IKI r..dwr .wr .r pl Salu.Frt. CN{ 13811 rwlJdrgw h 1J/ISn I. \ ADMIM kwrlFo.INwIA61.0 1 TMSI OF 4C1«1g3J P"1AO 1-3 ATION Mrs ,Ip�A��� pN {DA6w DUw 1. /.J +ea ulxrr u0 0G4 cm 1,1, Daft Irid FEB 11 } IUMfISI C/ AnV WrtiSl � rrp N..r Pl.Sa 0.w ..n__. ._. •1_ :.1 iA (.,. n.'ndel .• ath . . } r}1rJy1 (\\ iUI1SACI10N[SI /Q M1R l 1 /rnl N blk ti 11 'YJ L luraw N Mwn�lYir N {vr sill owt,11.1 J1va. J CiINDpWIIiJ '1 11'. .d. Gid~rrnl I { 611 hrrrn Wpe./, } Aw M1t«nI NYII SM rrrr N l,.wwl . -lYJ J } • Ory trot L A1«My Ad6nI W dAmw kw S)a4�Jr N SFwt r.�. r.a • MM rw nw wr.wnl«w M.l /Ir}l IV Ilvw }IV .w. r\WM qMN p..+aeN MJ4WC. t/mFl CMM An r .wN/arnl N Mr 0.JY..wn ..n 11 t. }y\ w llS MIw1. w FM l V 1e M w p.nMM w1.lF WA M eIMN FO1 M 11.\ FA.[MP 1} A/ylw.w Y111 IN M« ry roryp rwYirlld u reldr k/wrJ pw..w N FAw N «l «'ASl 1w+1 N a 4...w aN Ik1 .Art M � w..wlNl r t«N M M.wll M w MIMd ry N M psnYNl N M AkMYi[ w.M01 CMFN A.1 13 STAN OF cAluala.3 C., N _..!n .rrw• M ...,kw F r N �,4 Fwr �. w -..w... F ww ... W w w w.wn .� .. _./.n .w.y ti A,( 1/ AMK1Nr w __ ....... _. ( An11unDN BY nANm4oe 13 STATS OF CAVIOMA C., N .... idtL.ACiti/fwklle....... 0.M.......... ............... . u.F .wJw . w... F Y MFw F V w�. �/_Fn�n., ..Y •� wY. 4w. —j.�.� Y . r w � 4\. IA NwwNJ NIk1.wIJ w ylW4de NlklwJ(tl IS I4w11 IMk.de .1..� ,11 IC IJr M W m SFM C4r N tV Ced/ 4w\\ M No W.4/ blur rkb tywl tar Uterlllnll VU owl A,.O.N, O,e« "d .. Cl td lr }rnln OK- S i 't PA�nIWmr �r`� - 1 /QP��, 9y /I - AECUB /' ' �'� �N6 MOR C6NTAGr.5 ,i le CUB 15 LOCATED ON TNt SOUA/SJOE aF r0dTH114 Dlud., EtsroISAKBteyartoHORd., C lc1�ST OF,$wyrve,CH PeacaC RAic Road ovc.E Vass /. Prtn?saTY GJeaeH red 2eNeD i �avrns at A%j.cr4,. Ppmjv3: 6FNeQA/ PL"JaCN,NG GIXU&L NOQrH� '�4 /4M�ICfX/O1NY /AL EasrlNeawv- Risioturis� .Sdurf// /1P�uK. QFStOfRrfi�L �l Mkttrur.tory �lSlOFunaL 61LI i COPYr_- - [mrrt• -- - L/NUigM fDe A1r01101K YY1l.N YCMMU 1 n In %L� IV -O FEB EO': i Y. 0efrwrr a uwutl /r.rfw t«w.1 Leal laf I.,r�ut n/u s.V etm.ratao ""�"r""" .wty t�{�}].y,y�,��� � 3 I - w, i :T.4 - C00! Ilf r.4rtl.rd/NIfIf/r /r Vll • •- s• I2O7 LewwgMOM/rAolwr bw.i w rrwr dSotl7 3 kUWM IN MUGWM lltfuvv 1`7 Soar6LW U rtetu, NrW lltlr. Utew Drn 7 -JS -B6 Yalu o. Gul V. L 7r7m d 7Lu LAC71O1 m Fa lr1/ Irele o. Jott s L. F- 7sr• L 50.00 M C9 30 l Nrw M /r4rw 137YJ91d 7 -LLO.•n loud lcan 1 lraMr o1 Wr -[Mir M tnw 100y6o 1..e .bLboL <o. CN u�at Owt•co[Lf. CA 31770 curd m twu ! 5Q•W l Y Atiw lMr�4 s. M nrwrr tMM r�.r o1.... SO. 169051 alY.rl YL9 Mtn rtr tur tlten ew.lord rlr NwJr Wt 1ttat Wd MrwwfwM4rl II. /wW •'TO' �w w � f r 10 w � tnteLwM .MMM dW Y drtW fnt M Ili. tp4stlr. IL 41is +tlM MI Mr �I n+Kr ra.L w M r7Mted w «.W kwd nw.+w A 4w tt �t MtMwsw M f 4mw. t.d AI Y W i M M.4\ r rw r .wlrrd rI tl M frrMw rl M dYtMttr L..w.C• f.rM M IL {ul3 Or t:LLI0W4 Cn J �SNLPM1C[MJVkA __Ow__7- 16 -d6._ i. I r w rat �.� M r•�.w r .r..r� ..�. ter. r r. r u w .•_ .••.n.ww.Y.. IMLr�w.V��.Y n•.�r YS. rq.r•.w wM ^r II•tt�l•Ltl r9fpf {dtlYO 14 ♦IrIILaM MMttt •��T -1•� �,.}�(�/ IICII MIL! 1<ry. - ' Ltt3 a. Yae L. 4fadbct Wtnta3 LL // ••�� � APPIVICATI0N BY TlANSMOw s It sun IN rulloeda C--q tic W•.w ..��....., -ten. �v. �.I.�. W . r � ^.+. w�t.r. • ....d..w`+. ..raw .y.. � raw .w .r..� Y .�w� M ... .. rrrMr.rr�.� / As NM W. a Mow TL4/Jtp Ir Dro, M Vr 049 AMA" Lrvd•d rMq I -19-86 Mwlwr Mfwt p COIVI IdNI[D p Lr..tM rr. o1 .... ••••••• tttM.. • --�+Iw _ .__� Iw�Mr• rr. 7 PebPEIET- YCURAS"eYZ -"L-i C7d2RdLCoHM£gm/aL LLCmrvv oP AiTKsUr 1 kWj2TES : AldM / LW )?at4fu7' /,IL. S ST Lika &W&4/7 /OLY 6;,I94L6.NMEAflJL ,56UTH &W R£Slasw,rr.lL WE5T Guitsm. CewncLe�AD 8 9013 Erfvrr &Ll CyccL iro bv23 CMrsF uro X31 t t" , Fanaf.e.er 027 t4j F!<¢f3 i a.e +srwrer jy i{rUEeis 'SO+i i O r � `� 7 /Ecevcu w•rcc gx,i piacfa•cfd czld� „�.n •� CON E It k'enf A 1 9�sy f,+ NNERL,AL St, -- I 771 My 7724 r • .FWTH,'LL 131 vD �a •nwLLSiYI. tv�re gaN`L 711E 71E[6VeN POOD .57deb /S We-4 FED ameJ AIOdTN84S7 Cv¢tJ£¢ eF Aa&41laAe0 A&D r6c"ro lz& Stud iumllm 4kc. YMIU.FrVs DuTP43r CI�A1yEE PebPEIET- YCURAS"eYZ -"L-i C7d2RdLCoHM£gm/aL LLCmrvv oP AiTKsUr 1 kWj2TES : AldM / LW )?at4fu7' /,IL. S ST Lika &W&4/7 /OLY 6;,I94L6.NMEAflJL ,56UTH &W R£Slasw,rr.lL WE5T Guitsm. CewncLe�AD 8 9013 /1d.91a/-3 CLAIM FOR DAMAGR OR TNJDRT 1. Claire for death, injury to person, or to personal property must be filed no later than 100 days after the occurrence (Gov. Code, Sec. 911.2). 2. Claim3 for damages to real property moat be filed ro later than 1 year the occurrence (Gov. Code, See. 911.2). TO: :ITT OF RAYCIW COCAMWaA AO G1S?ti ddr�t_I<'ll Mir m7�R �i7l.7 ) / ✓�•3�y /, / ;y ess ci Zip Phone Age Hare of Claiman ant t A k:h:nn�rn r117r. Address to which imant-wiahea notl e3`aent. WM did damage or injury occur? I1�nr,!(.\ �l1 ,1 7 r1 —L�US WHM did damage or injury occur? ROY and under what circumstances did damage or injury occur?. 4 f .,. ) J. YRAT particular action by the City, or its employees, caused the alleged damage or injury? (Include names of employees, if known). r t 4- sum do you claim? Include the e It stimated amount of any pru3pe0tive 1033, insofar as IL may ba known at the time of the presentation of this claim, together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed. (Attach estimates or bills, if possible). s Total Amount Claimed: h)nCtle•f�2M r -r1, NANR9 and addresses of witnesses, doctors, and hospitals: Data � 91gna�LVre -of C1almAnt 1 S03(479) -RC(R) W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DAIS: March S, 1986 T0: City Council and City Manager oO FROM: Mark Lorimer, Administrative Analyst)& A I SUBJECT: APPROVAL. OF C 41SULTIR. S RVI- S FOR MOP PROFILFOUMt ATI09 The C .ncil will recall directing staff to initiate the process of establishing a ao: profit foundation which could be used to financially support the future cultural center sod other futnre -type facilities. In order to establish the nom- profit organisation, it is necessary to hive legal documents prepared acd euJmitted to State and Federal tar authorities in obtaining tss- exempt status. Foundation by -lava mad incorporation documents art 4100 necessary. It would be appropriate for the City to contract vicb as attorney for these services to insure accuracy and validity. Staff has maintained a close working relationship with Mr. John Francis, an attorney specialising fn establishing am non- profit organizations. As written in the attached contract services agreement. Mr. Francis would Prepare all re4uired documents necessary for the City to obtain tar - exempt status and create the non- profit organization. The total cost for Mr. Francis' services would not exceed $26000. Staff recommend@ that the City Council approve the attached agreement between the City and Mr. John Franck for legal services in the creation of A non - profit foundation. ML /dja Attached /v aer :9" ACRCEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this 22nd day of Ja nary, 1906, between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter known as ^CITY") and Mr. John Francis ( heraicafter known as "CONSULTANT"). A. R.r{tals. (i) CITY •s heretofore issued ice intent to contract for legal services tatb respect to establishing ■ noa- profit corporation (hereafter referred to an "cervices "). (ii) CONSULTANT `as heretofore issued an intent to contract with CLTY for the performance of such services. (iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform services necessary to establish a coo- profit corporation. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such services as hereinafter defined. NOW. TBEREFORR, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follwst B. Ag,_.. Lal. 1. n tlL aicl_et The following definition shall apply to the following taro, except vb.re the contest of this Agreement otherwise requireat (a) Service. The completion of those services described in Exhibit "A" beratot EXHIBIT "A" Preparation of the following: Articles of Incorporation Bylaws State and Federal lax ereupt status applications Filing of all necessary documents and forms with the Secretary of State, Franchise Tu Y Internal Revenue Service and Registry of Charita. ruses. Conduct of the corporation's arganicationtl meeting. 2. CONSULTANT aer..• a fallave, (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith perform the services in accordance with Exhibit "A" berate and all in accordance with Federal. Ttate, and CITY statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. Agreement Page 2 0. CM1 rar, as follwe=- (a) Io pay CONSULTANT a sum of $100.00 per hour for legal services and $20.00 per hour for paralegal services (a maximum of $2,000.00) for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum @ball cover the cost Of all staff time, legal reprasentatioi at no more than two City rcbeduled Council or staff meetings and coo otganisatioeal meeting, and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Paywot to CONSULTANT, by CITY shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth balm. (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be ands by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a quarterly basis, beginning April 1, 1986, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charger shall be in accordance with CONSULTANT'S proposal either vith respect to hourly rates o lump sum aeouots for individual task@. In no avant, however, will said invoices exceed 952 of individual task totals described in Exhibits "A ". (c) Additional services: Paymamts for additional services requas red, in writing, by CITY, shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth to paragraph 1(a), above. Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. CONSULTANT shall not be paid for any services performed in excess of forty (40) hours each work week unless such additional hours are requested by CITY for additional services. 4. CITY ,r... to orev(d" ra COhem j=t (a) Such information as is generally available from CITY •ilea applicable to the service requireeent@. (b) Assistance, if necassary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However. it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to make all initial contacts with respect to the gathering of such information. S. Ornrrahin of ho o •nte: All doe umeats, data, surveys, drawings, maps, photographs and reports prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon paymact for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials ,ball be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. 1.2- Agreement Page 3 6. Tereinationt This Agreement may be terminated by CITY upon tba giving of a written "Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fiiteea (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANI shall be compensated at CONSULTANT* applicable hourly rates as set forth La paragraph 3(a) above, on ■ pro -rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project cocpleted as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximm specified in paragraph 3(s) above. CONSULTANT shall proride to CITY say and all documents, data, surreys, drawings, maps, photograph•o and reports, whether in draft or find form, prepared by CONSULTANT as of the date of temication. CONSULTANT may cot terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Nntirps and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written cemcunicatioes between the parties berate shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The balm named individuals, furthermore. shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties und3r this Agreement: C ?ty Manager Larector of Commuai.p Development Any such notices, demands, invoices and written comounicoricae, by rail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thereof to the United States Quilt postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Indeenification: CONSULTANT shell defend, indemnify and save barmleas CITY, its elected and appoinerl officialsb officers. agents and employees, from all liability from lose, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of aoy and all legal costs and ac.orneys' fees, in say as east arising out of or incidental to the performace by 1.09SULTANT of this Agreement, including, but not li�ited to, all consequential damager. to the caxicum extent permittgd by law. 9. Aaeigyl ect go assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be madet either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 10. j-.d.roendpnt contractor: The parties berate agree that CONSULTANT is an iedepsadent contractor under this Agreement mad shall not be construed for any purpose to be an employee of CITY. 11. Governing t. v: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the lava of the State of California. 13. Attnrnq'a leers In the "eat any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce say term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorney's fees and casts from the oppasing party in •a amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 15 Agreement Page 4 13. Enttre A. a •e t Thif Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise cot contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. I8 WIIBEBB WBEBEOP, the parties hereto have executed thi• Agreement as of the day and year first set forth aboaet COg56h3A11T \I ? Jot W Pranc e If CITE Jon D. Mikels. Mayor ATTESTt Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 19, 1996 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Courcll FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lisa Nininger, Assistant Planner LCCAAtoi. C l H9 2 J > SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -01A N - request to amen the Land Use Map o the Genera Ian from Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 13.55 acres of land located on the south side of Feron Boulevard between Archibald and Turner Avenues - APN 209 - 055 -02, 03, 14 I. BACKGRf"IND: The applicant requested a General Plan Amendment from l. w i qty Residential (2 -4 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for a 13.55 acre site located in the North Town neighborhood of Rancho Cucamonga. A previous General Plan application for this site which requested an increase in density to Medium Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac) was denied by the City Council to Dece•aber 1985. The attached Planning Commission report Provides more detailed information relative to this item. II. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The major issues considered by the ann ng one ss on at t e 22, 1986 hearing were land use compatibility and consistency with the goals and policies of the General Plan. The Planning Commission determined that the change to Low Medium Density would not create significant land use incompatibility with existing single family development surrounding the site. Issues regarding coripatibllity of housing type in the 4-8 du /ac range with the predominantly single family detached homes in the neighborhood could be resolved through design and site Plan review at the project revel Additionally, the location of the Law Medium Density project within a Low Density area was determined to be consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan by "encouraging qreater housing diversity without changing the single family character of the surrounding residential neighborhood." Thus, the proposed change appears to be consistent with the General Plan if the single family character of the neighborhood is preserved by use of a compatible project type. /S 19" CITY COUNCIL STAFi REPORT GPA86 -OIA - HAWKINS Februar/ 19, 1986 Page 2 III. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Ne-n-er—al­717a—n-kiendment and issuance of a Negative Declaration. If the City Council concurs, adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval would he appropriate. Should the Council not concur, a Resolution of Denial is also attached. It should also be noted that the City Attorney advised staff and the applicant that prior to Council approval, additional documentation would be required indicating the applicant is authorized to act on behalf of property owner. As of this writing, this documentation has not been received. Unless satisfactory documentation is received prior to the hearing, this item should be continued. Re ectfully bmi , Brad Buller City Planner 88:LN:ko Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report, January 22, 1986 Minutes cf January 22, 1986 Planning Commission Meeting Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial /(' r. 1.= CITY OF RANCHO CUCUIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 22, 19L•6 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lisa Wininger, Assistant Planner oC .tt01, � "Vro C O ?p Z U > tan I SUBJECT- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 85 -0IA WK li - A request to amen the an Use Flap of the h'� n-31an from Low Density Residential (24 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential t4 -8 du /ac) for 13.55 acres of land located on the south si,le of Feron Boulevard, cast of Archibald - APN 209 - 055 -02, 03, 14. ABSTRACT: A General Plan Amendment is requested from Low Density resid— e�al to Low Medium Density Residential for a 13.55 acre site located to the North Town neighborhood of Rancho Cucamonga (see Exhibit •A•). The applicant previously requested General Plan Amendments to Medium -High Density Residential and to Medium Density Residential, which were denied by the Planning Corission and City Council after review of the Environmental Impact Report and discussion regarding land use compatibility issues. At this meeting, the Commission will receive public input and consider the General Plan Amendment to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac). II BACKGROUND: The project applicant, John Hawkins, has requested a Genera an Amendment from Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) to Loa Medium Density Residential (4-8 du /ac) In 1984, the applicant submitted a request for General Plan Amendment 84 -03A from Low to Medium High Density Residential. After preparation of an EIR as required by the Commission, it wa• determined that the approval of the aPPlicat.on would create significant environmental Impacts which could not be mitigated. In addition, significant land use compatibility problems were noted. The Amendment was denied by the Commission, appealed to the Council, and in June 1985, denied by the Council. In September, 1985, the applicant submitted an application for General Plan Amendment 85 -04D for a change to Medium Density Residential. The application, was denied by the City Council in December 1985 on the ground; that the land use change was Inconsistent with the policies of the General Plan relating to the land use compatibility and transition of density. The applicant has now resubmitted at a lower density range. !1% ITEM N PL�VNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ^- ^.er:l. Plan :acn�.w..t 96 :lA January 22, 1986 Page 2 III. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Re uest�ed: Environmental Assessment per the attached n tl 1 ial Study -inU-cons i derat lon of the General Plan Amendment. B. Location: South side of Feron Boulevard, between Archibald and urger. C. Parcel Size: 13.55 acres. D. Exlstino Zoning: Low Density Residential. E. Existing Land Ise: Vacant. F. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Rancho Cucamonga Middle School designated Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac;. South - AT 6 SF Railroad right of way and winery, designated Industrial Specific Plan. East - Single family homes, designated Low Density Residential (2 -4 du /ec). lest - Single family homes, designated Low Density Residential (2-4 du /aci G. General Plan Designations: North - Low Density Residential South - General Industrial (Industrial Specific Plan) East - Low Density Residential West - Lo4 Density Residential. N Site Characteristics: The site lies at the terminus of a drra nags cTanneTirfiF a small drainage course traversing the center of the site in a north -south direction. A large portion of the site lies within the lOD year flood plain and is subject to periodic flooding. Vegetation consists of a row of Eucalyptus trees alon- Feron, scattered tree•i, shrubs and grasses. Feron Blvd. ovidas direct access to the site, with Main Street dead - ending 11to thu site on the east and west property boundaries IV ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The final EIR for General Plan en ent 3A�srusses potential environmental impacts for four alternative land uses for the site; Low, Low Medium, P um and Mixed Use. The discussion of Low Mediun Density states t.dt this alternative represented no significant impacts. Based on the /4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT General Plan Amendment 86-OIA January 22, 1986 Page 3 conclusion of the attached Initial Study and the EIR, staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 86 -0IA. V. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS: The major issues to be cons er ar reg ng t s application are land use compatibility of the proposed density with existing development and consistency with the goals and policies of the General Plan In the Low Medium Density range of 4 -8 du /ac, development could theoretically occur with housing types in a single family, zero lot line, duplex, or low rise townhouse -type pattern Since tie surrounding area is developrd with oldar, single family detached homes with densities up to approximately 6 un+ts per acre, development in this range could be compatible with existing development. Development at the higher end of the 4 -8 unit range could create some incompatibility with surrounding development. However, this concern can be addressed through appropriate design and site planning at the project level to assure compatibility and proper transition. The General Plan states that Low Medium Density is "characterized by residential densities somewhat greater than the Low Density Residential group." It states that Low Medium Density would be appropriate within tow density areas to encourage greater housing diversity without changing the single family character of the surrounding residential neighborhood. Therefore, it appears that development of the site at a Low Medium Density is not inconsistent with the goals of the General Plan, provided that the single family nature of the area is preserved by use of a compatible project type. VI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Should the Commission, upon examination of e General Plan Arfendment, determine that the change from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential would promote the land use goal; of the Guieral Plan, and that tWrs-7nendment would not be materially Injurious to the adjacent properties, the oiTTowing findings are necessary on approval: A. The Amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan, and; B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. and; C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious to the adjacent properties. /9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT General Plan Amendment 86.OIA January 22, 1986 Page 4 VII. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a e ort and notices were sent to all property owners wit n eet o the boundary of the proposed property, in addition to other Interested area residents. A 4 foot by 8 foot supplemental notification sign has also been erected on -site. VIII. RECD MENDATION: Should the Commission determine that the required TRRY75FTTWings can be met, adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Should the Commission determine that the Facts for Findings cannot be met, a Resolution. of Denial - also attached. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:LM :ko Attachments: Exhibit •A• - Vicinity Map Initial Study Resolution of Approval Resolution of Denial 'Zp MEDIUM aj t . CHOQL SITE F -gwrrn JJ �•�•JMV:iM'i %•�•'N •VM:iI':i:l�(!{:��: {::j:�':': :: ��T .I t i• ---/L• GENERAL INQUSTR `! GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS FORTH CITY Or rm. %I, 6M go-o/ RANCHO CUCAMO \GA Tmc, Vloolw/ /77.t$2 PLArNNING DIVEON am fry "• SCALE, 'Al C Pago 2 YES w.tY3E no I a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction Of flowing streams , rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b Changes In absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? z c. Alterations to the course or flcw of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface later in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? g. Change In the quantity of grounds, tens, either through dire.. additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? —. h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public lacer Supplies? I- Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or ,tithes? 3. Air Duality, Will the proposal have significant results Sas A. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? -- b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? _- e. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? 4. Biota Flora Will the proposal have significant results ins a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered speeIts of plants? • jy - I { C CITY OF RA. \CHO CUCAMONGA PART II - INITIAL STUDY E:VIROM4r —%'TAL CHECKLIST DATE: Jc;/I &, I9B�o APPLIC.I•T: F1 /)h/i N,�ItJ,['{//s FILING DATE: //G2�2.��fjs LOO h'lMER: 6jPV Al, -o /A PROJECT: 6y)/l/d/ / /dyJ !�w(f!/Kf�/KILN� A /il y!O �TLI /yfi�ii PROJECT LOCATION: I. ENVIRON'S TAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yes' and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets) YES )RYSE NO 1, Soils and Ceoloav, Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? _- b. Disruptions, displaceeant. -. compaction or burial of the soil? c Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affect -ng either on or off Bits conditons? f. Changes in erosion siltation, or dep- ,sition? • Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h• An increase in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? 2. HydrolaaY. Will the proposal have significant results in: a3 ` page 4 yrS �'1ySE No , 8 Transoortatlon. Will the proposal have significant reswltS !n: a. Ceneratlon of substantial additional vehicular movement' b Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? c. Effects on existing parkin& .cilities, or demand for new parking? — d Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? — —✓ e Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? f. Alterations to or effects on present and potential water -borne, .411, =as transit or air traffic? S. Increases In traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? — � 9. Cultural Resoutzes. Will the proposal have significant results In: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, Paleontological* and /or historical resources? — -- ✓ 10. 8ea1[h. Safe[v, and Nuisance Tractors. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? a- c. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? -- e. Increase In existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dang.•rous noise levels? 1/ S. The creation of objectionable odors? — 1 h. An increase in light or glare? atl — — — C ?age 7 YES "_41'eE *0 c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of into Plants an arep? — d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural Production? Fauna, Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers Of any species of animals? b. Redaction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or :csult in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat? S. Posulation. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b Hill the proposal affect existing housing, or —. .Y create a demand for additional housing? J C Socio- Ecanamie Factors. Will the proposal have significant results in: A. Change lu local or regional soeio- eeononic characteristics, including etonoxi- or coperc IA1 diversity, tax rate, and property values? L' b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? _- 7. Land Use and Planning Considerations, Will the Proposal have slgntticant resin c: 1n? A. A substantial alcoration of the present or Planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, 1' Policies. or adopted plans of any governmental entities? — e. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of exiscln& consumptive or . +on- consumptive recreational opportunities? 5 -- C Pa;c S ME °LI e° SO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have signific results in: - ant a. The obstruction or degradation of vista or view? any scenic ✓ b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? c. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12 Utilities and Public Services. Vill the proposal have -- a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a Electric power? ..0 b. Natural or packaged Sea? ✓. — c. Co=unications systems? d. Water supply? — a. Wastewater facilities? ✓ f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? ✓ h. Fire protection? — 1. Police protection? -- ✓ J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? ✓ m. Other governmental services? ✓ 13. Enerev and Scarce Resources. W�I1 the proposal have —` nlgnificant results In a. Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? _ ✓ b. Substantial increase in eanand upon existing sources of energy? I. An increase in the demand for development of new sources of energy? ✓ d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable Inert es of energy are available? / '�.& _— r�t e. Substantial depletion of anv nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? 14, Nandatory Findings of Sicii•lta�ce ease 6 Y =S _. Y9E SO — z a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish o: wildlife species, Cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal Community, reaute the number or restrict the range of a rcre or endangered plant or animal or elininato important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? — —_ ,L b. Does the prof act have the potential to achieve short -tem. to the disadvantage of long -tem, environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the envtro=ent is one which occurs In a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- term impacts will endure well into the future) �- c. Does the project have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an Individual project are considerable when viewed In connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). —_ d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effaces on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II, DISCUSSION Of ET'ViAo \Lm r[AL EVALUATION (i a of affirmative answers to the abo.e questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures.. 7a 7b. At prcpcnfd prof "ci - /tpraeA& a- /god use Chan �/ /owing fwctt as p^any dam / /oy uhcfj- as u�a.S y /eUiovs /y yYinnikd ;iu. ��� 5ca{fs �!x{ no 9lgni �ied�.f ,ltd usf frnpads whiGlrr Pansat .fx mn'igatra! ewd orrur N tit AV- 'Vd1rfn, (¢r1ai+'Y :��• .27 ` l Page I22 DETER.YI:tATfos Jn the basis of this initial evaluation: Elfind find the proposed project COCLO NOT have a significant effect an the envlro=enc, and a SE;.ITICZ DECLLlATIOY will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environmant, there will not be A significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described an an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NECATLTE DECLIR4,TI0:7 WILL BE PREPARED I find the proposed project XAy have a significant effect an the envirnment, and an MIR0 \':'=.`7T VIPACT REPORT is required SSgaa cure Title ,7 Y DRAFT EXCERPT - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 22, 1486 N. ENVtRONMENTAI ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 46 -OIA - HAWKINS - A Residential (2 -4 4w /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac) 13.55 acres of land iocated on the south side of Feron Boulevard, cast Archibald - APN 209- 055 -02, 03, 14. Brad Buller, City Planner, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner 831'Ker asked if the project was a market rate project, could the developer come in with a request for a bonus thereby increasing the density. Mr. Buller replltd that a 251 density bonus could be possible which would increase the number of units from 8 Um 10. He additionally advised that this would be an issue addressed by both the Planning Commission and the City Council, if requested u. the applicant. Chairman Stout opened the public learing. Tracy Tlbbailc, 10522 Wilson, Raucho Cucamonga, addressed the Commission on behalf of the applicant. Mr. Tlbballs acknowledged that the 251 density bonus Issue for affordable housing if requested would be addressed by the Planning Commission and City Council at a later date He requested approval of the General Plan Amendment from Low Density to Low Medium Density. Nacho Gracia, 10364 Hmmboldt, Rancho Cucamonga, supported the amendment and stated that he was happy to finally see the density reduced to an appropriate level. Commissioner Barker asked If Mr. Gracia understood that the density could come to at 10 with a density bonus for affordable housing. Mr. Gracid replied that he would like to see what that would mean on a site plan, sinco he was not sure how that would affect the number of dwellings constructed. Tnere were no further comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Comuissioner McHiel stated that this was the density which was established as the one most suited for this parcel and was glad to see it finally reduced to that level. Commissioner Chitiea stated that 4 -8 is acceptable and could be compatible; however, was concerned with compattbtlity should the density increase to 10 under a density bonus. Commissioner Rempel was concerned with the development of condominiums or apartments in this area of the City. He stated that this type of product is inherently incompatible with the area due to surrounding uses such as the school an one side and the railroad en the other; therefore, could not support the amendment. He suggested that the project be developed under the terms of a Development Agreement. a9 Commissioner Barker agreed that 4 -8 units per acre is an appropriate density for this parcel; however. was concerned with development at 10 units per acre under a density bonus. Chairman Stout stated that he had not changed his opinion that 4 -8 units par acre is an appropriate density for the parcel. He indicated to the developer that when the Commission expresses strong concerns regarding compatibility at higher than 8 units per acre this issue will come up in the design phases, therefore strongly urged the applicant to consider this concern in their building program. Commissioner Chitiea asked If there was a way to tie a development agreement to the land use amendment. Mr. Markman replied that a development agreement replaces zoning not the General Plan designation; therefore, could not be applied to the land use amendment. Mr. Markman indicated that before this project goes before the City Council documentation would be necessary to indicate that the people signing the application are authorize,' to control the land use on the property. He advised that if this documentation is not receded, it would be necessary for the City Council to continue ecnsideration of this item until it 1s received. Motion Moved by MkNiel, seconded by Stout, carried to recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the Resolution approving Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 86 -0IA, Hawkins, to the City Council. Motion carried by the fallowing vote: AYES. COK41SSIONERS: MCNIEL, STOUT, BARKER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, REMPEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: HONE - carried 30 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86 -01A, AMENDING, THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (2 -4 DU /AC) TO LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DU /AC) FOR 13.5 ACRES OF LnND LOCATED SOUTH OF FERON BOULEVARD AND EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments an the proposed Csneral Plan Amendment No. 66 -01A. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby makes the follow ng n ngs: A. Tho Amendment does nct conflict witn the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. B. The Amendment promotes goals of the Land Use Element. C. The Amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties. SECTION 2_ The General Plan Land Use Map shall be amended as follows: Assessor's PArcel Number 209 - 055 -02, 03 and 14 shall be changed from Low Dens ty Residential (2 -4 du /ac) to Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac). SECTION 3: A Negative Declaration is hereby recommended for adoption by�ie City Council for this General Plan Amendment, based upon the completion and findings of the Initial Study. NOW, TPcREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commis•lon does hereby recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 86 -OIA to the City Council 3/ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Page 12 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. PLANNING COK41SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dennis L Rout, Chairman ATTEST: !�-- -13, du BUIM, ucputy Sevretary :, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of January, 1986, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MCNtEL, STOUR, BARKER CHITIEA, REMPEL NONE .3-L DATE: T0: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIUNUA STAFF REPORT March 5, 1986 ral im City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Monte Prescher, Public korks Engineer Approval to award Turner Avenue Improvement Project Contract to Vance Corporation, lowest, responsible bidder Per previous Council acticn, bids have been solicited and received for the subject project which consists of street improvements and widening (A. C. psving, curb & gutter, sidexalk, etc.) and minor on -site improvements to facilitate street widening on Turner Avenue from A.T.&S.F. Railroad north to Feron Blvd. The bid documents have been reviewed by staff and the apparent lowest, responsible bidder is Vance Corporation for the amount of $173,676.75 The engine er'•: estimate is $167.911.75 (see attached bid summary). The subject project is to be funded by HUD participation and Gas Tax funds. RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the Turner Avenue Improvement Project to Vance Corporation for the amount of 1175.676.75 Attachment 3e/ NN�N.... .... ......... .... um3S`� °:S�.N••x�"m.N..: SS"::.N.. R °r$w ii °'Fn L �1 QPV6i ��erOnAA�J�A�<���P7_��1 +�� • w'b",�J'M$b",'dop..r rm75��8G;+.,"6,b"•r.�;V lS u...�rn�r °-a 8888888 P. iS:^:^888a88M�5y8888iSM�8S:^ yy •QQ•}u}((PUtlPOW NN$r$ fnf��tlNNfNf�� !P!���N�((�j�j(( QrQNdrtl�yy P GK�S� SONa�SSSaZSNmsOSZS�PON •Ni• N m � 88888a88a88888388iS888888N8888 - 8•.Y•,'o S%N•r- r-L�'.�' S:e "d�v;•s o;+N••n ur °-o ° 8 's88a'sa8o:^:^58888ffio888N8G$MiS M:^ � S 6 rNNN Ptlrw.. N n�•�.......... T 5 �� � ' 8' ssass�a8s 's'sss'aaaass'sasassais's �rd Yi�815.N.CNrrtl$Sb'6o rBNUd �:.rnurr o i 888888685��88 $88lS�688�88MNBi3i^ � r Yr uoPwti ,°VO y�ryy��qq55��•yr•y yybVYQNQN99pp ��V•• yy yym QQrgrg qqV p SSEbdS u�•°•ME�075�EoS,tlN„o S,VN,.338�8'N O25 aas' sa8' s' s' saa 's'sa'aa'8's's'8's'a'ss�'sa's's .3 S P a A r S P a P 7 9 2 Y ffi Y, m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAYONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to award North Town Phase IV Improvement Contract to Val Foth & Sons, lowest, responsible bidder Per previous Council action, bids have been solicited and received for the subject project which consists of street improvements and widening (A. C. paving, curb & gutter, sidewalk, etc.) and minor storm drains on 8th Street, Belmont Avenue and Acacia Street. The bid documents have been reviewed by staff and •ne apparent lowest, responsible bidder is Vat Foth & Sons for the amount if $153,832.41. The engineer's estimate is $189,608.00 (see attached bid summary). The subject project is to be funded by HUD participation and Gas Tax fwids. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the North Town Phase IV Improvement Project to Val Foth & Sons for the amount of $153,832.41. Respectfullly submitted. Attachment 36 ■ k /�k \��;�$ {��� }�I�) ! \\. }�•� / } {. \ /� /�../ _ ..8.8 8 ,8��.� - - -• r,..r84sa,11.r7�9 ®,� 48 s s,.,¥6.��..R ! !I!!K§ ;/!§7 ■ §,44 §4■ �,.�,r ■�_.�� :'�),�r Rw�,��, =w� ■R�,,,,.- A ■§ 88814 88�.�, § #) ( § § § ..; \. /. .7).. S w..,19 21 s29 skS88888888 ,r § s ,4■k.■■ww���� ! � -. ■r §, -: r,8kr 9 8 -. 9 _8 8 8 8 ,8 8 :.8 89 8;8 J9 § � | k § ' ®�{ |`( ; §| | |. ;| ! |) §( | §| E |� | | , §} ,f \� | � § | § - | | § | ; §§ ;f � }@ § /§ | 38 |� | |� , -AMON= /E' §) §��)] • -!� I�. r 2| !; ■!■l ; ;=2fll §!�!!!§ �I ■ §§ §klk�)t2! #2� § /!■$'mF s ■�a.ww.,�ww, ■w■..k.l.- ,�f | § | ; §§ ;f � }@ § /§ | 38 |� | |� , -AMON= CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1986 tvn TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent SUBJECT: Acceptance of Tract 11350 Cooperative Agreement with Lowy Development The Base Line and Hermosa (Cooperative Agreement with Lowy Development) Improvement Project has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. It is recommended that the Council approve the acceptance of the project, authorize the final payment and direct the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder and release performance surety (5420,000.00) and retention ($8,574.81) in 35 days after filing the Notice of Completion. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council accept as complete the Baselina and Hermosa (Cooperative 1e wtemi Improvements the City Engineer to il the Notice of Completion and release performance bond and retention and authorize final Payment. Respe tfu v su LB .:D :bgl ,39 r eY- /3 Ail A CEMENT BASEL,.E RCAG N[MOS4 AVENUE Cg4TRL'TION AGREEMENT T41S A,R(En(NT, wed- and cntared Into t1I.'p'Ljd., of I�j% : 19y6 by and act�M i6a CITY Of RANCHO Ci'CAMOhGA. CALIfeRN1A, • grah"ipel co•OA..tion. her.in- after •ercre" to as CITYr' emJ LCVV Oa V[L9enLNT CON , horalneftar raf"I'd to el '011110aLr', yrwidas VITNLSS(lN nw[REAS 0(V(t Op(A I daraloplog ••act 11550 In ins CITY located on the north- 0 ... r of ..sal ma Road and Iprmv AVer'la and Lw(R(AS DEVELOPER a+ a ..ondlt-I or laid erect Is required to lwroYe portion+ of bullae Road west of braes. Avem,e and harmu Avenue west of this eenterlln. of IMma Ali. and LM[REAS. It la the .-An of the CITY to loin with the DEVELOPER In the concurrent mrgV dael.t of I... line Road east of Norm,. Alan,.. and armta Avenue all or the an•Lrl'ea at hernia Avarua, and WEREAS, the +aid IwrtrWnts are designed Or the Civil Engineers Associated of Cnbrlo, aid shown In the CITY .pp,ov.d drtwint no 410, Sheets 1 through A. Mre.naft., referred to as 4[Nl tali R' and .LAEAS. CITY'- and DEVELOPER', r,co ytiv. re+ponlibllit, for lost+ a regnds iM �grare+on.s shown In Erh.alt A mall the as Coll-- DEVFIOIIK'S R[SPCNSIb ILIly cost COST Im, o.rrwentS of U ,.IIAI bad as -nom M Sheet E. tAnlnit 4, IwrortwenO east of the oateritne or heron,. Avenue as shown on $Met S. [Ambit A. nrlpirg and m,lt W'dhm of signs on bseliee Read La Teak Way to hermsa Avenue as shown raw Sheet 4, Eah tot A. IrIPIN AM Installation of shyns on I(ormsa Avenue frm be.el lne Road to Lol.11a Drive a +wen on Shea 4. [.men A city $ a[SI'C"IehLITY OR C6rl tool min nlS of /av LA, Road as slip. on Sheet I (.h.a.i A. bpforcocnis oat of tM centerline of Ipfmu Avenue as shown on Sheet $ [.Malt A. It Ipir, and .hetal gt.on of tithe on bristling Road flow "pans. A'-' mug to STA EI.66 as shown on Sheet 4 finials A. Sir ping and lnstailatim of Sign$ on hero,. rrenve Iron bath me bad to IWIl.111 of I.sellne bad At Shorn on Shea 4 [.ma.a A ww I.[, A IT IS AVTwuY A.R[(0 AS rOLLM I Cr ru SHALL 1 Act o 11 Ic.d went in Ime rome"llation of ggel"a Road and Neno•A Atetue as shun In [.hl Olt A E rra..de an last, e,ulpmnt and Wfar..:% and +ripmrW +tan f.,.Ir.J to c apleiv eanu n4ion of said imroyewents In ..... Jln.. din app, it Mahe speCincatlons aM.,t.si prepared Jolntly by CITY AM DEVEL- OPER .M A, .aplorrd by IM C4ty (line.' (14- Ih l o +y }. SOO- 110•d. auarc all conu•ucum cmtracta andaab all p1o91o11 PS1.t1t. \ (onVleut, fund. wffluenb to concleta the street iwrov. .t .ors n defined in 4nlelt A and as ttlpulated lareln. S Pre,la. CITY at Conpletion of construction • delete audit of all cost aM division pI Funding 1wp9nslbility 6 Arr&q. .nttcliatinn of the undergrand utilities pertlnont to the develoe. asim, of Tract A, IIS1J within at raft rig -tf al -coq uIth;, the 01VELCM -1 loft-oft of lha w1k prior td 1 nal paving of Sas.l•ne Road and harevofd Ave. have Provide SITy upon as rDWncf of all the nofoveMnt wore by the City with a welntedmae bond of the &aunt .I tan Percent (101) of the tool .ee- sVactlon cost of talc co,oreden(+ for a officer of bier year It CITY SMII I Pat to DEVELOPER within smrtV 110) days alter approval of pregqu parefnts Invoiced to tea C 1, n on shunt proportiew.t. Wen the ....tide, of wore cotel.tel on the CI11'1 wort it.-' to the data 01 billing less a left (10 m .... t retention ] upon AccYPtAKe 01 CI-7 a portion -1 the Irorovewants by CITY, CITY shall Day to DEVCLOPEV.nadouet which together .III Ih. prwleus ofrnfntt a sated Ir gngraph 1 above. shall con.t r i. a tool aggr.gata of one hunlred Nrcaal (1001) or the actual conaVUC[Ien mss of CI Ty'. portion of ton ;.m axnn Sold paw+.nl shell be away by CITY within thirty 110) era,, alto CITY'S acuptanc. of the +lea iprnv<'vnls 1 Urro acceptance or all construction were aM receipt of can percent (Igq w.ntemnce bond venllenfd ...11o t.yy shell r.luse DEVELOPER grow at boon opllgaaon covering eoayletlon 0, eonTlrVC- t on III IT IS rWTUALLf A6R10 ' That the clTy's cwt of const'ucticn and the DEVCLOPECI cost o/ construe - tiw -.•,under ..II -at be ev.1 Attached "Palo a• Inhibit C If a cced- -I- wh ch felt (.1 lb . breakdown .1 the ..Monied Gu.Mitt of CMtt,,w,IM lutef -awls ckNctcd to he wad For ton street i.rpro.,e,ett of heywo,a Aveeue .-it taw I. no cued Said Cal bit R, Sheen I and 1 01 \ IS •he schadule of City s portion of the est.mted quantity and the en.mted dIt. rM Sh..ls 1 and t of L if lhe acheufl. of DEVELOPER', portion of ton ast.mled Guan- tlty and the est,wabd coot 1 in the rvont am Ic9s1 action Is c>nenc.d by either party to enforce this Aq�taxnt e1 m recover ane ace+ d.. harfuM.r the ..... 1IIn9 ..14 .hall be [nulled t. reasonable ate..nq+ fen W evert I.".. • •Ints M).mreent fh. •. a the erh.rlt er all n e 'Ad s.cteasor• In Interest u NrTtOf WEREO/. the 11ti., .al. e..C.t.d this Ayr..At It A..hm Wca.enDer Cal lYOrnit oM cM d•. and .... Irst Ree.. wrUt.n CITY Or AAAChO CCQV''C��M'',,OACA� OV (311( C.c AAVOA ATTESTS - s 0 PROVED AS TO FORM. L I Y A TD AE !,.q OR e410.•a w 0, +,y _ its o-w•F .«y // L �. •V bb.r. I1, 1 OlCwmy� (• SVew.w bys.Ie wpF b..y AbM 5!i .. .wbvy.•. w Pe wry .wb...e y..eo. P,eA Pe,FA Yp AAQRR.07 NfRY..w•....w�= yy � r. "mscr. nwanwo. ge.byb. r rs« avt cw. —.hue. �.»� y-1 SONY DEVELOPMENT CCU by w.. �VTeart� TSr AFECD NOT., eey Cen'.IAL Stnt t �. tA. • 6: y if! vb Wy:: mmW¢tto P 6.v lYl e.A.A GSIYE s o= .os �e i. �.l .q of H- 2A .33 s p �Y M 3 oo eeP o 00 oe eeole eee`oe ee a oee 7E >too od an� —e o 00 ooelo a oeoloe eoo�o^ $ 8.`r 88 H88 j l�s "s�o o0 00 ° o 'CA sss o � - �N3 I i s o= .os �e i. �.l .e, § /G \ / \�(g\ , •� _ - � {� ; -�- � 7q, ss: A A A i^ is o° ° oee oe eea eeo a eoe De ooe Do 0o y¢ I i o � ou nD D >�£ De C eDD e0 Oee 000 D DDD =D DDD DD 00�^�" i� 8$ 3 888 88 888 --88 8 H8 88 b s Y �s s� w} rIz !!! •, � ! ° )§ fa,■ a �§ §)f f■ !■� �`, -.�_ - §�/ '! - { - j )�5I ; \ \R rIz !!! •, � ! ° )§ fa,■ - §�/ '! - { rIz � ! \\, / Rd 7 §�/ j ; \ \R � ! \\, / Rd Bond No 103381 nroni um Nil MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND FOR STREET IMPROVEY,FNTS OF HERMOSA AVENUE AND BASELINE ROAD WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, and United citizens abrt or, cbro.. a calif. Wra. (hereinafter designated as 'Print pa have entered into an agreement whereby principal agrees to inxtatl and complete certain designated public improvements, which said agreement, dated H rich 12_ , 19ga , and identified as project Tract 113 °0 located irthwest torngraAfiellnehliermosa is hereby referred to and made a part ereo ; and WHEREAS, said principal is required under the terms of said agreement to furnish a bond for the faithful performance of said agreement, Section 16, guaranteeing all improvements free of all defects for a period of (1) one year after acceptance of TR. 113so by the City. NOW, THEREFORE, we the principal and tlevelorre Instr[anx 0,_._arp. as surety, are held and firmly bound ante a ty o ncncRlo ucamonga (hereinafter called 'City), in the penal sum of ^went o ouaand Dollars (f2l,000) lawful money of t United Sta 'fes, or a payment o�F%h sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of thin obligation is such that if the above bonded principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perfcrm the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alteration thereof made as therein specified, and in all respects according to their true Intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, It shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the race amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney's fees, incurred by City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreements ortto the work to be performed tl.ereunder or the specifications accompanying the same shall in anywise effect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement or to the work or t0 the specificatiuns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been duly executed by tho principal and surety above named on DnLober 2g, . 1985_ First Nationwide Network Mortgage Co DEVELOPER formerly known as unitoo citizens mortgage Corporation, a California anon Tv: fdPy D- R .r ant r By: Allan N. Lowry, President I 7 SURETY DEVELOPERS IILSURANCE COMPANY ame III W'1-hl Ar "hNn P 9PAnl Address RECORDING RE03ESTEO BY CITY Of ASK" CUCAMIGA P. 0. &OR 807 Rancho CuAamngl Catlfo"., 91730 WIN li,NDED NAI( TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RAI" CUCAMNGA P. 0. Roc 807 Narno Cucm,gc, Ca)Ifornla 91 30 NOTICE OF COIOLETION NOTICE IS NERET GIVEN t)gT 1, the uMdt1SIgMd IL M o+rer of an Interest pr estate In the hereinafter described reel property, the nitdf of which interest or estate is: EXACT 11350 (COOPERATIVE AGREERENT) 2. The WE nine and Address of the uaderslgned owner IS CITY OF BAMM COC%vvA' 9320•[ a ilnr Road. P. 0. Bo, 807, Rmcho CotAaonga, California 91730. 3. On the SIN day of Narch, 1986 there was Annotated on the hereinafter dawibed "a) property the work of 'TroefpMt Set forth in the contract dOAUeentl for: 7AACY 113SO (COOPERATIVE AZAEEFE)(I) d. The nq of the original contractor for the work of Igrnreaent as a AOTe was: LWY DEVEEOPKIIT 5. The real property referred to Fwein Is situated In the City of Rambo C"~98, County of San Bernardi", California, _nd It described as fol lon: BASE LINE AND NWOSA CITY OF RANWO CUU43MIA, a Runic al corporation. D gn '�� -- Lloyd u. ku6b&, 1 ng neer y8 RESOLUTION NO. 406.ft4o� 'y' S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO FORRTRACT,11350FANDIAUTH RI ING THE FiLINGIOFIA NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK AT BASE LINE AND HERMOSA (COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH LOWY DEVELOPMENT). WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 11350 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 1986 AYES NOES ABSENT: -11-7-F-ATEe'is, iiayor ATTEAT: Beverly s Guf6eTeE I- f- -tied 1, OEYERLY A AUTHELET CITY C1fRK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, La Ifniiiett a hereby certify t at the foreydind ROldlutton was duly passed apPTnve� qn adopted by the City Council of �he City of Rancho Cucamonga, aE a regular ((special, adjcurned) meeting of sal rity Council hell on the ► ddy lqr Executed this • day of •. 19 +• at Ranch, rucimanga, Calif,,, 1113 Beverly A A ut e e , ty er T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1986 UI —" W7 T0: City Council and City Manager FPOM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Ergineer BY: Richard R. Coto, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Acceptance of •Appraisal Report of the Proposed Right -of -Nay Along Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California Attached is a copy of an appraisal report for private prope ^ty (APN 202- 181-09) owned by Archie and Betty Wilson at 7074 Ramona Street. The purpose of the report is to estimate the fair market value of the property and the portion which is propoc.3 to be acquired for right of way in conjunction with the Southern Pacific railroad crossing widening on Archibald Avenue north of Base Line. In aoplying to the Federal Government for funding of the proposed street and railroad crossing widening, the City is required to formally review, approve, and accept said appraisal report. The land proposed to be taken %r the Archibald Avenue street widening is a twenty -five foot (251) wide strip of land along the west side of th= subj_ct Property. Also included is an additional six -foot (61) wide strip of land for a slope easement. continued. Total Areas: Part Take • 25' x 250, • 6,250 sq. ft. Slope Easement • 6' x 250' • 1,500 sq. ft. Estimated Land Values: Part Take • 6,250 sq. ft. @ $3.20 520,000 00 Slope Easement • 1,500 sq. ft. @ 51.60 2.400.00 522,400.00 $0 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Acceptance of Appraisal Report of Proposed Right -of -flay Along Archibald Avenue March 5, 1986 Page 2 Estimated Depreciated dalue of Existing Improvements: 17 Mature Orange Trees ® $125.00 • $2,125.00 230 L.F. of 120 Concrete Irrigation Line with 11 Concrete Cap Stands • 1,500.00 $3,525.00 Curative Costs $11500.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED JUST COMPENSATION $27.525.00 Although the City as yet has not received Federal authorization to proceed with said right -of -way negotiations, it is permitted to review, approve, and accept in format said appraisal report. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the appraisal report of the proposed right of way along the east side of Archibald Avenue north of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company Railroad. S/ RESOLUTION NO. 8C, - y 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE PROPOSED RIGHT -OF -NAY ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE NORTH Or THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY RAILROAD. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an appraisal report far private property (APN 202 - 181 -09) owned by Archie D. and Betty Jean Nilson, husband and wife, as joint tenants; and WHEREAS, the City proposes to acquire a portion of said property for right of way in conjunction with the Archibald Avenue and Southern Pacific Transportation Company Railroad Crossing widening north of Base Line; and WHEREAS, app0caticn for Federal funding of said widening project requires the City to have prepared, reviewed, and approved said appraisal report as one of several conditions tor Federal funding; Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by ti„ City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said appraisal reoort Is hereby approved and accepted PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this S'1 day of Marsh, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Bever y A. Au[ a et, ty er Sa Jon 0. MikeTs,-Maiyo—r — CITY OF RANCHO CUCADIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1966 T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Mubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beet, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Maps, Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Tracts 12642, 12935, 12936, 12931, 12938, 12939, 12940, 12941, 12942 and 12943 located in the Caryn Planned Community, submitted by Kaufman and Broad of Southern California and Marlbough Developm:nt Corporation. Tract 12642 was approved by the Planning Commission on January 9, 1985, for the division of 115 acres into 510 parcels in the Caryl Planned Camrunity Development district located at the north west corner of Highland and Milliken. The Deielopers, Kaufman and Broad and Marlborough Corporation are submitting agreements and securities to guarantee the construction of -he off -site improvements in the following amounts: Kaufnan and Broad of Southern California Incorporated Tract Faithful Performance Bon] Labor and Material Bond 12642 f177,0800 0 S 4,000 12935 539,900 12937 125,600 V.800 12940 83,500 41,100 12941 76,500 38,250 12942 94,000 47 000 Backbone improvements for Tract No. 12642: Landscape: Faithful Performance Bond- S 822,000 Labor and Material Bond: S 411,000 Int- rceptor Levee: Faithful Performance Bond: S 84,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 42,000 Maio,• Streets raithful Performance Bond: $2,076,000 Labor and Materfal Bond: $1,038,000 53 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Approval of Maps, Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for Tracts 12(42. 12935, thru 43 March 5, 1986 Page 2 Offsite Storm Drain: Faithful Performance Pond: S 930.000 Labor and Material Band: S 465.000 Marlborough Development Corporation Tract Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Material Bond 12936 $108,000 f54.D00 12938 139,600 69,800 12939 85,000 47,500 12943 109,000 54,500 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tracts 12642, and Tracts 12935 thru 43, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. Re - ppeecyully submitt LBN:LB:� Attachments Sy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IRPROYEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT NO 12642 KNOW ALL HER BY THESE PRESENTS That this a reent is made an: unttred Into, In conformance with the provisl mons of the SNdivislnn Map Act Of the State Of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the CItY of Rancho Cucamonga, CallfOrnta, a municipal cdrpOratlan, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and taufman and broad hereinafter referred to as the Developer WITNESSETH THAT. WHEREAS. said Developer destres to develop Certain real property to sold City as shorn on the conditionally approved subdivision known as Tract No 12642; and WNERf AS. said City has established certain requirements as be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located at Milliken and highla ^d Avenues "'. THEREFORE. it is hereby agreed by said City and by Said I•ualoper as follows: I In$ Developer hereby agrees to construct at Dave oplr's expense all improvements described On page 6 here. Of within twelve months from the effective date eereof 2 Thlf Agreement shall be effective On the date yf the resolution of the Council Of said City approvlrC this Aare as This agreement %hall be In default on the day follow. In the first anniversary late of said approval unless an eaten. 110" Of ties has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid. ad. S The Developer may request an taunt ion of time to complete the terms hereof Such request shall be submitted to the City to Writing not Ills than 70 days before the expiration date hereof, end shall contain a statement of Circumstances necessitating tae extension of time The City shall have the right is review the provisions 01 this agreement. Including the Cpnetructfon standards. cast astlma te. and Improvement security, &I and to require adjustments tnereln if any sabstsnti change has occurred during the term hereof 4 If the Developer falls Or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement. the City shall heva the 1qht At any time to cause said provisions to be not by any lawful means, and thereupon recover True the Developer and /or his surety the full Cost end expense Incurred S The Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot of said development In accordance with the raqqu lotions, srhedules, and fees of the CUCS-0190 County water District 6 The Developer shall be responsible for replacement. relocation, or removal Of any component of any Irrigation water Slate[ In conflict with Construction of required improvements to ant satltf4Cttmn of the City Englneer and the owner of such water system. T. Improvements required to be construCted shall conform to the Standard DreWings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by Ind on file In .1_ ST the of ff ce of the City Engineer. Said Improvements Ire tabulated on the Con Struction and Bond Estimate, hereby Incorporated on Oage 6 nererf, as eaten from rem Improvement plans listed thereon by number The Developer that1 alto be 1160pnsible for construe. tlan Of any transitions or other Incidental wort be old the tract bdundarlal as headed for tvety Ind proper surfact drainage Errors or Omsk SIOMS diSCOW01 during cofitructin Shall be Corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan madlficationt teal be Core red by the prow ts ihnf of this agreement and secured by the sere ty covering $1,e at i1 planned worts B Construction permits 11,811 be obtained r she Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start Of work; All regulations litter eh croon shall be observed, with attent toe given to safety procedures, control of oustr noise, or other raisante to the area, and to proper notification of public utiI loe tiles and City Departments pea err• to comply Wien this sect shall be subject to the penal AS provided therefor 9. The Developer Shaft be responsible for removal of all loose rock$ and other debris from public rights -of -wry within or adjointng said development resulting from work relative to Setd development 10. pork done within existing Streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City Shall have the right to CamDleto any and all work In the event of unjustified delay 1, completion, and to recover all cost and expense Incurred from the Developer and /or his Contract), by any lawful means 11. Said Developer ihall at at times following dedlca. tion of the streets and easements in sad subidivitien, ip to the completion and acceptance of tad work or Impror•m•nt by sold CIt7 Councf 1. 91r• good and adequate warning to the 'rat If, q pub lc Of each and every dangerous Condition axlstent in told street or easement, and .111 protect the traveling public free Such effective or dangerous c]ndltlons Until the completion of All hprovements, herein incorporated on Improvtstrts Shall be und�ere1the charged of said DenlAcce ;ted as Dew eloper mar Close All Or t portion Of any street subject to the condltI a contained in a temporary •tree• cloture permit, Issued by the C-ty Engineer, whenever It Is necessary to protnrt the public during thhe Constructfon of the Improvements herein agreed to be made It. earkwey trees required to be planted shall be Planted by the Developer after other Improvement wort, grading and cleanup has been romplrtsd planting Shall be done as provided by Ordinance in aC. Idenca with the planting diagram approved by the City Coenunite Do alaPalle Director. The Developer Shalt be responsible for maintaining all treat planted in good health until the end of the yutranteed maintenance period, or for are year After planting, whlclever is later. 11. The Delete -r lee Mpenslbie for •acting all condi. clans established by the Clry pursuant to the Subdivision Rap Art, City Ordlances, and to is agreement for the development. Ind for the maintenance of all Improvements constructed thereunder until the leprOreeent Is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no improvement security provided herelnwith 1%, be released before such acceptance unlgt• Otherwise provlitd and Iutherlted .y. 5(0 by the City Council of the City 14 This agreement shall not torsi mate until the maintenance guarantee Security hereinafter described has been r al eased by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required Improvement security has been submitted to tho City by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council sage has been accepted, and this agreement and the Improvement security therefor his been released is The Ippravemant security to he furnished by the Develops, with this sgreement shall consist of the following and shall be In a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement 1. A bond or bonds by one or acre duty authorized corDO -Ate Sureties In the fore and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1 2 An Improvement Security Instrument in the fore and content specified by the City Attorney. 7 A deposit with the City of money or negotla)fe bonds of the kind approved for securing deppSltS of public monies. g To secure latorers and matertefmen: 1 A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized cu•porate sureties in the fore and content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1 2 An Improvement Security Instrument In the fore and content specified by the City Attorney. I. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bands of the kind approved for IScaring C A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or Surveyor whose certificate appears upon the final Map for the S meting of all boundary, lot Corner, and Street centerline monuments and for furnishing centerlInd tie metes to the City. The mount of the deposit soy be any amount certiflad by the englneir or surveyor As acceptable payment In fult1 or, It no value 1s submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and fond Estimate contained herein. Sold cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proem. dure permits of ter rscsto! by the City of the contorting tea notes and wrltt an assurance of Payment in full from the esglneer o- surveyor. 0 The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are amt forth On page 6 of this agreement 16 The Developer warrants that the improvenants described In this agreement shall be free from defects In motor .is and workmanship Any and all pnrtlons of tie improve- ments found to Do defective within one (1) year following the data on rhick the Improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired ar replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Developer Shall furnish a maintenance guarantee Security In a sum equal to tan percent (101) of the construction estimate or $200 00, ghfChe'or Is greeter, to secure the faithful Performance of Developer's obligation% as described in this para- graph The maintenance guarantee secu -Ity shall also secure the f althful performance b)) the Developer if any obligation of the Developer to do apeClfled work with ,eSpeet to any parkway maintenance assessment district Once the lmprovements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantn security has been accepted .S. 57 by the City, the other Improvement vcurity described in this agrvesOnt may be released provided that such release Is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Nap act and any applicable City 0edlnonce 17 That the Developer shall take out and maintain such Public liability and property damage Insurance as shall protect his and any contractor or subcontractor performing wart covered by this agreement from claims for property danagef which may Sells because of the nature of the work or has operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself Or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or Indirectly employed by said persons, even though Such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The yyubllc llabilltr and property demage Insurance snail list the Ctty as addltonal Insured and directly protect the City. its officers, agents and employees, as wall as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued he-eunder shall so state The minimum amounts of such Insurance shall be as follows: A Contractor's liability Insurance provtdlnq bodily Injury or death liability limits of not Ins the 5300,000 far each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage ltabil- Ity limits of not less than $100.000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggro ab limit of $250.000 for claims which may arlsa from the opera. bons of the 04,01a per to the performance Of the wort herein provided. 8 automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used In the performance of this agreement Rroviding bodily Injury liability lie its of not ns than $200,000 for each person and $300,003 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $50,000 for each acclaent or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than 1100,000 which may arise from the opera- tions or the Developer or his Contractor In performing the work provided for herein. 18 That before the emecutlon of this agreement. the Developer Thal rite wisn ter City a certificate or certificates Of Insurance coverlet the specified Insurance. Each such certificate shall Dear em encorsement precluding the canceilst Ions, or reduction 11 coverage of any policy evidences by such certtylcata before the expiration of thirty (30) days after the C.ty lhefi have received notifl atl on by registered mall /ram the Insurance Carrier. As evidence of understanding the pro.ISlanS contained herein, and Of intent to romply with ama, t "e Subdivider has submitted the followlug described improvement security, one has affixed his signature hereto: •e- y. DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE RUST BE NOTARISED .5- s'9 FAITHFUL PERFORNIIRCE Type: Principal Amount SIO11.000.00 tame and address or surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMEMT Type: Principal Amount f Se, 000.00 RAN& and address OF furecy CASH DEPOSIT NORUNENTATION Type: Principal Amount: S 5,250.00 Rama and address of Surety: MAIRTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: NAma and address of surety: 70 BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE By THE CtTT -• - IN WITNESS HEREOF. the Parties fratentt to duly ,-Routed /orgIllttes hereto have caused Chase and 4can0- ul ra pulred by Say ph the algnatu•u Iedged With all dat of set /Drib opootlte that, Date Apr D —�� y -� '� �� + pp gna ure/ 7 - -• Developer r me BDUF, °y�q�,Aii ncU Data o y Pna ure .O ereloDar / � rnmq al.a.m T, w•a �� .. r n f •• Accepted; City of Rancho Cuuponea. California A munlHDal Corporation Py: . mayor Attest: f V Approved: DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE RUST BE NOTARISED .5- s'9 C1r .rep.. "CITY Or OMITS CUCAnO1CA s: }•• 1116II1110IMi OITISIMI ESIINAIE N COSt TRACTIrNIM _Tract 126e7 DAIS 7/9/65 LOCAtIM Nr- A6i6TT'T6'T2� -� 019111091 4V Nn •9a MT JcMSO`�--�--� IN611111f1 oreNn. r . OUMTIi1 trill Met SAN[ k1OJAr P.a:T ' •r P... C. Ca.O IS' C.r 24• roller P.C.C. cure :•r 7.25 ��. L.r L.r $1, 9u tM r.C.0 cure only 6.OU -L2U A.C. be,. 4.o ' A R90 S.t IP9 aC roach Pp 1 Is itZTC7S S.r C.T. ! Street •Oaa .iienul itr (1. cure) 2.50T�p 3.10 C.T !B. S.r +a•� lgerled e+eantreel Prep +r Oil" of a^egrad9 1.50 Lso S.r. 'roUrcd 499• one (per Inch thlC%1 � Ton A.C. arer 1300 lent) A.C. 90 to 13M lent) 0. ] 27.03 TO A.C. S0 to 903 lees! I]- 75.00 TON S.r A.C. u.dr S0 tens) A C. thlcal 45.0 0,0 S.r patch A.C. (trench) 0.55 ZsrDQ-JI7 S.r. [A. 1• thick A.C. Imlay Adjust fe.er mMele le redo grade 1.7$ 0'0 EA, [A. Adjust fewer clean out le Adjust .,ter NI•et le trade 150.00 50.0 �---�_ LA, Sheet Ilthts ��. L.r, L r. [aRlcades (lnleruc SSOO.I.) 1090.0 1.0 _8 1 e P redwood huAer S.r L.r Re+oeal or A,C. pne.Mt glass, of P.C.C. cure 1.15 0.35 L.I -..L. EA. 2e.ural oT A.C. eer. Street Sits 1.30 1.0 -�- U. Reflectors and pests 20.0 ._- L.F. Concrete blues .,It ]S.0 S.r Retalnlr, wall I5.0 Off Aggre9ata bate 20.0 C.T. Concrete Structures 7.0 J Is, NCI (200 0 425.0 L.r 21• RCP (150 0I 29.0 F. 36- 0 3 5.00 15.0 F. LA• 11' RCI I20 0 Calth basin V • 7' 49.0 76.0 EA• EA. catch besln N . 8' Catch best. V . 22' 200.0 290.0 EA. Local depress tan /' 450.0 LA, [A. LM41 depresiton 12• 50.00 100.0 LA. Junctlan Structure Outlet structure, Sid 906 S"•0 U� Outlet It ruc lure. Std 150? 15S0�W �--� -- L.r. ward pest, ward panel ("Ml 75.000 St.cul [n -� L.ra 1 +ed.aodlhe'd "wl�) 2 0 4DOC.0 S.r, L•r aldscapl.q9 8 ("fission 1011 cure 1p.C.C.) 1.15 2.75 �-.-_ EA. Strtet Trees 7.0 10.0 1.60.0 E7.thEERIND tNSPtCTjM IE[ t rs SUB TOTAL 97,529.75 •RESTCRATIO.WELINUTIO9 C1•N y�,� CONTIRGENCT COSTS DEPOSIT ION SLUA6tE)) rt1Tn11A PERrORWNCE IM (IOOC) _Td&,3ayj'C�N' flpnlp'tI1TAT10 11NETT (CASNI 3.150,0 LABOR AND PATEAIAL Mn (COS) 3REELl SSSS • UrtuMt to City RE Rancho SXAMOga nur.lc1041 Code. Title I, Chapter 1.0, tlopINS San lvoarelre C"t7 Code Titles. Chapters 1.5, a Cash restoratlCn/d4i!neat lAn depos t Shall 00 made prior to Issuans of an Engineering Coestructlm Panll. =9"muw. RAVISAd 3184 (06 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT f0R TdACT NO. 12642 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agyreement Is made and entered Into, 1, conformance with the provlf ions of the S ubdivlston NCO Act of the State of California, -nd of the applicable Ord minces of the City of Rancho Cu a conga. Ca11 /stem L, a municipal corperat ton. br end be been said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and KiufmH and Broad hereinafter referred to at the Developer WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City as shown 0n the conditionally approved subdivision known es Tract No 12612; •nd RNEREAS, said C1 ty has established certain requ l recent% to be met by Hid Developer as prereJulslte to approval of said subdivision generally located At Milliken and Highland Avcnuas . NOW, THEREFORE, It is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer at fmllowst 1 The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer '% expense all Improvements described on Page 6 hare- Of within twelve months from the effective date hereof. Z. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement This agreement shall ba in default on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an sitan- Sion of "me has been grsntad by said City as hereinafter provld- ad. 1 The Developar may request an extension of time to complete the taros hereof Such regvaff shall b• submitted to the City In writing not less than 00 days before the capitation data tar Iof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances eeCessftating the extension of time The City shall have the r l ght to review the provlslont of thit a reement, Including the Construction standards. cost estla ate, Ono laprOwamemt security, and to require adjustments tnereln If any sue tantlaI change has occurred during the term hereof 4 If the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provisions of this a reement, the City snail have He riyAL At any time to cause sold provisions to be mat by any lawful suns, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or h Y sun ty Ina lull cost and expanse incurred S The Developer shalt provide metered water service to each lot of said development In accordance with the reqqulatlons, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Water Distrf ct. 6Th* Developer shell be responsible for replacement, relocation. or removal of any component of any irrigation water system In conflict with construction of required Improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system 7. Improvements required to be Constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and StandarJ Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file In -I- (0/ the office of the Cfty Engineer Said Improvements are tabulated on the CO Itructlon and Bond Eitfmata, hereby Incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the Improvement plans listed thereon by number The Developer shall also be responsible for cdnstruc. tlon of any transitions or other Incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage Errors or ommisslonf discovered during constructln Shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer Revised work due to said plan modlflritio ns Shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and SeCired t the surety covering the original planned works 6 C,nstruetlan permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the offl:e of the City Englneer prior to start 0f work: all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, wi to atcentioo glven to Safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments Failure to cooply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor 9 The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks ant other debris from public rights -of -may within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to said development 10 York done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to Completion: the City shall have the right to complete any and all work In the event of unjustified delay In completion, and to recover all cost and e.peas• incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means 11 Said Developer shalt at all times to l loving dadica. tlOn of the streets and easements to said subidfvislon, up to the coo at10n and acceptance of said work Or Improvement by said Cl t) Council, give good and adegjate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition existent to said street a. easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions Until the COUPletlon of all Improveaentt, herein incorporated on Page 6 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as imp raveaents shalt be under the chargt of said Seveloper Said DavelaDV Say close all or a portion of any street subject to the condttlanf contained In a temporary street closure permit, issued by t't City Engineer. whenever It Is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the leprovemtnts herein agreed to be made 12. Parkway trees required to be planted shall be Planted by the Developer after other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed planting shalt be dono as provided by Ordinance In aeeordanoe .Ith the planting diagram approved by the City Community Developw•nt Dl rector The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees planted to good health until the end of tA• gquaranteed maintenance period, or for one year afte- planting, vAlcharer fs latwr. 13 The Developer Is responsible for meetingp all condi. tions stabllthed by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act. City Oral :as, and this agreement for tha developmeets and for the maintenance of all Improvements canstructed thereunder .rstil the Improvement is accepted for maintenance DY the City. and no Improvement Security provided herelnwfth shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized .2- (P .% by the City Council of the City. le This agreement shall not terminate until the maintanance guarantee security hereinafter described has been rmlaased by the City. or until a new agreement together with the required Improvement security has been submitted to the Citi by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City - Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security therefor has been released is The improvement security to be furnished by ter_ Developer with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be In a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement 1 A bond or bonds by one or sore duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499.1 2 An Improvement Security Instrument In the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3 A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds Or the kind approved for securing deposits of public mantes B To secure laborers and materialmen: I A bond or tends by nne or more duly authorized corporate sureties In the fare and content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1 2 An Improvement Security Instrument In the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 0 A deDosft with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appea.s upon the Pin al Nap for the sattfnq of all Doundarr, lot corner, and street ca rat ar the mnn uments and for fu-rlshing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified be the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment In full; or, it no value Is submitted, the cash bond shall be as show, 0n the Construction and Bond Estimate contained a herein. r Said cash deposit may refunded a loan as li dure perelts after receipt by the City o1 the ec f the rotas and written assurance of caymenttin full en payment In (call from the engineer or surveyor ( D The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are sat forth on page 6 of this agreement. I 16 The Developer warrants that the improvements x described In this agreement shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship Any and all portions of the improve- ments found to be defective within one (1) year following the data on which the Improvements are accepted by the City shall be repal,ed or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee (r security In a sum equal to ten percent (103) of the construction estimate a 3200.00, whichever Is ypru ter, to secure the faithful performence of Developer- s obllaatf on% as described in this para- yyraph The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the Oeveloper of any obligation of the Developer to do specif I,d work with respect to any partway maintenance assessment district Once the Improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by tha Clty, the other Improvement security described In this agreement may be released provided that such release Is otherwise Authorised by the Subdivision Mao Act and any applicable City Ordinance 17 That the Developer shall take out end maintain such Public liability and property d.maga Insurance n shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property uemages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from operations undo, this agreement, whether such iorations be by himself or by aoy contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly eaployed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone eaployed by said persons The public 1LbI lit? and property damage Insurance shill list the City as additon al Insured and directly protect the City, Its officers, agents and employees, as we11 as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors. and all Insurance Policies issued hereunder Shalt so state The minimum amounts of such Insurance shall be as follows: Contractor's liability Insurance prorldinq bodily Injury or death liability limits of not less the $300.000 for each parson and S1.000,000 for each accident or occurrences and proper[: damage ltabll- 1ty limits of not lass than 5100.000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggroqate limit of $250.000 for claims which may arise Irom the opera- tions of the Developer In the performance of the work herein provided Automobile liability Insurance covering all vehicles used In the performance of this agreement provtdlnq bodily Injury liability Ile l is of not ll mss than $200.000 for each person and $300,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage I lability limits of not less than $50,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an •g fegai• of not less than $100,000 which may arise from the opera- tions of the Developer or his Contractor In performing the work provided for herein. 18 That before the esecutian a/ CMS agreement. the Developer shall file with the City a certlfl Cate or certificates of Insurance cover Ing the specified Insurance Each such certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding the rarcellations, or reduction In coverage of any policy evidences by such certificate, before the espir:'ron of thirty (30) days after the City shall have received aotlflcatlon by registered A& it from the Insurance carrier As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of to tent to comply wi" same, the $ubdlvidcr has submitted the following described Improvement security, and has affixed his signs Cure hereto: _d_ mftwopme G C/ F^CITT Or RANCHO CUUMICA - �,_" '✓ ENGIRMING UITISIOI l: ESTIIIAIC OF COST IMTMVDR Tract 12642 BAIT 719/85 LOCATION � BI9111n-G ��caulwn roc - LOnSaa6T� E114111[lll organ, nc �Ilunln unlr rTln PRICE aqunT 2.41 L.r L.f P.C.C. curb _ IZ• C.1 t124 • gutter 7 25 - _ L.r, P.C.C. curb _ B• C .r i veer P.C.0 curb "l7 g , S 000 T�-- L.r A.C. ben _, 3.F 4• P.C.C. sidewalk 4.50 6A S.F S.F Drle• approach B• P.C.C, 1.75 � - 0.T cross gutter line curb) Street ):10 Ca arc, at lm lacorted a mlaCnl L50 �@,pp0 S.F Preparation of "1,,& 1.50 axe sOR Gushed •99• bate (Per Inch thick) �•ZW.00 O:G �76J!w ipil 1ON A.C. orer 1700 lent) 27.00 On A.C. 900 to 1700 tom) P.C. SOD to 900 tons) 75.00 7y 700 A.C. uni& $00 Ions) 15,00 60.00 S.7 S.F. A.C. (7• lh'ctl Patch A.C. (lrerch) 0.55 -7ru 00 S.F. G• 1• thick A.C. e,,rt,, 675 0.30 U. Adjust serer s,aMpte to 9r.0a Adjust 250,00 A. tar. clean Out le grace AOJ +sI ra.er Telref to 91.41 Street lights is GO L.F. Ilanludes (Inters". $500 In) 1000 00 1,00 L.P. 2 A a• redracd header 1.75 SJ LF Repent of A.C. paeecnt 0.15 L.I Reahral nl I.C.C. curb Reahnl Of A.C. beru ].b 3 � [A. Street slept 100 700.00, G. and pesla 3500 L.r S.N. Concrete Concrete .wall wall 25.00 .F iJ Aggregate ball Aggregate base MOO C.T L.F, Concrete st res 1B• 7.00 125.00 LF RCP 21• RCP 20M 0 2000 0 ISm 0 29.00 L.r, 76• RCP 2000 0 75.00 19.00 L F 4B• RCP 1200 0 76.00 G. G. plch bnln Y a' 2000.00 [A. Catch basin Y • 8' 290.w [A. Catch basin Y • 2Z• /900.0 [A. Local depression a• 500.00 - G. Local depression 12• 1000.00 -� Junctlon structure SM.00 G. G. Outlet structure. Sid [506 1500.00 E1. Oitlet structure. Std IS01 $00.00 L.F, Guard "$is Guard panel (shed) 10.00 t.r Sarcul 25.OD G. l.r ileadrall (an- wing) 1000.00 S.F, Rtdroed header tandfCapl G Irrigation 1.15 2.15 -7�-- G. StreatuTree&.t.G.) 7.50 IDO'00 4.600.00 ENGIIIIERING INSPECTIOI FCC d�9eS,pp SUB TOTAL 977 54 522 75 •RESTORATIOT/OELINGTION CASH �- CCATME6T COSTS DEPOSIT (REFUAOABLE) FAlDQUI PERER"CC 8010 (1005) IO.NONENTATION SURETY (CASH) 7,250,00 LABOR AN0 MATERIAL BOSO (505) 'Pursuant t0 City Of AMCtu CK4510"9a Muhtciprt Cede, Title 1, Chapter 1.08. adopting SAO Bernu41n0 ComtZ COde Titles, Chapter. 1 -5, a Cash restoration /d011Aeatlon deposit i8t11 be Bake Prior tO Issuance of m Engineering COnstructlm Mutt• /Mwmw- Raised G(el we .S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 10. 12935 KNOW ALL HER By (HESE fgESENTS: That this ayregiment Is sae• and entered Into, In confoitanee with the provlslOme of the Sub�lvtsio. Map Act Of the Stet* Of California. and Of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and �atween said City hereinafter referred to as the City. ono fAUFM/d1 AN a OR Of SOUTHERN CALIFOARU, INC. herelna er re errs o as e eve Opa WITNESSETM: THAT, YNekEAS, said Developer desires to develop Crrtaln real propertyy In said City as shown on the eondltlosally approved subdivision tnewn as tract No 12915; and WHEREAS said City has astabllssed cartel ....lame. is to be m•t by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said fubdivlsion generally located at N l liken Avenue and rlghland Street NOW, THEREFORE. It Is hereby A-reed by said City and by said Dave l Doer as follows: I The Develoter nareby atrees to construct at Developer's ea Pease All Improvements dascrloed on page 6 here. Of within helve aontht from the effective dot- he-oaf 2 This agreement Shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement This agreement shall he In default on the day fellow - Ing the first anOhersary date of said approval unless an Satan. s ion of time has been granted by 1Hd City as hereinafter provid. ed 3 The Developer may request an extension of time to ComPlete the Ceres hereof Such requrst shall be submitted to the City In writing not lass than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necafsiteting the *at*ns ken Of tied The City shall have the rlghI to review the provisions of this agreement, Including the construction standards, cost estimate, and loproveaant security, ono to require adjustments therein If any substantla change has occurred during the term fereof. e If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this Agreement. the City shall have the right At any time to CCY$* said previsions to be met by any lawful of an', '"' thereupon recover fro, the Ca,eloper and /or his surety the full cost and expense Incurred S. The Developer shall provide altered water service to each lot of Said development in accordance with the re yqulations. schedules. and fees Of the Cucamonga County Water Dlf tract 6 The Developer shell be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any Irrigation water frstea in conflict with construction of required improvements to lAt satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water systs,. -I- 66 7 Iwororeaents required to be constructed shall cOnfOvG to the Stcndard Drawings and Standard SpecfflcatloOS of the City and to the Oao,ovemen Plan approved by and on file In the office of the Cfty Engineer. Said Inpr ...... IS are tabulated on the Construction. aid Bond Estimate, hereby Incorporated on sage 6 hereof, is taken floe the ImprOVUent Dlanf listed thereon nu mbar The Developer leper shall also be responsible for construc- tion o1 any transitions or Giber Incidental work beyond the tract boundaries As needed for safety and proper surface dr nage Errors or Omissions discovered during constructln shalall be correCted upon the direction of the City Engineer Rerfsed mark due to said plan modifications shall De covered by the provisions of this agreseent and secured by the Surety covering the original Planned Works 8. Construction permits shall be obtained by the DevalOPCr from the Office of the City Snglneer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety Procedures, control Of dust, noise. or othor nuisance to the area, and to protor notlfic lama of public utilities and City Departments ants FU lure to Comply with this section shall be Subject to iM PenaiaieS Provided therafor, 9 The Developer shall be responsible for removal of All loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within Or adJafning said development resulting from work relative to said development 10 Rork done within existing Streets Shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right t0 COmplete any and all work In the event of uftJuftlflea delal In Coco le tta., and to recover All Cott and @.pens@ Incurred from the Oev*109*r and /or his contractor by any lawful means 11 Sold Developer shall at all Limas following dedlOa- t hn of the streets and easements In said sueldlt slop, up to the Completion and acceptance of sa•d work or Improvement ty sa1C Clef Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling public of tech and every dangersus condition as Stan in said street oe easement, And will protect the traveling public from such da•actira Or dangerous conditions Until the completion Of all bprcvCm@Mts, hsreln Incorporated on Improvements Shall be under@ the of harged of said s Developerpte Said Developer may clot@ all or a portlpn of an• street subject to the conditions contained In a temporary ftreei closure permit, Issued by the City en2lneer, whenever It Is necessary to protect the Public during the construct) to be mane an of the fsprorements herein agreed 12 Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer attar other Improvement sort, grading and cleanup has Deep completed Planting that, be done as provided by Ordinance In accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Mmunity Derelopcent DfreCtar The Developer Shall be responsible for maintain,mg all trues Planted In good health until the end of tie quaranteed maintenance period, or for one )far after p silting, whlthever If later .J The OevelOper Is responsible for meeting all condf- tlons established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, City Ordlances, and this 'agreement for the development, and Ion the mat- tenmce of ail aprovements constructed thereunder .2. 6% until the improvement Is accepted for maintenance by is e City. and no improvement security prod ded herainrtth shalt be released before such acceptance units otherelit Drovidtd and authorized by the City Council of the C ty. le This agreement shall not tervinate until the mainten a.' ce guarantee security hereinafter described has been raieased by the City, ce until a na. agreement together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the htrela named, and by resolution of the City Council sue has been accepted, and this agreement and the Improvement security therefor has been released 19 The Improvement security to be Turn Hhtd by the Developer with this agreement shall Consist of the following and shall be In a fora acceptable by the City Attorney A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. I A bond or bonds by one or .ore duty authorized corporate sureties in the Pore and content specified by Government Coda Spetlon 661.9.1. 2. An Improvement Security Inst-went In the fore and rontent specified by tee City Attorney. 1. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public aonles B. To secure laborers and eaterlalcen: 1. A bond or bands by one or rare duly authorized corporate sureties in the fore and content specified by Governscit Code Section 66199 1. 2 An Improvement Security Instrument in the fore and content specified by the City Attorney. y A deposit kith City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee Payment by the Derelaoor to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Map for the mattin of all boundety, lot corner, and street centerIfns monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or. If no value Is submitted, the Cash bond shall at as shown on the Conftra.tion and Bond Estimate conlatnsn herein. Said cash deposit way be refunded as soon as proce. dure permits Jut receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written Hsur&nce of payment In full from the engineer or surveyor. 0. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are eat forth on pagf 6 of this agreement. 16. The Developer warrants that the Improve. described In this agreement shall be free leas defects mattrla is and workmanship Any and all portions of the lap: Bents found to be detective within one 41) year follow Inaa data on which the improvesm is are accepted by tht City shal repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance quart security In a sue equal to ten percent (10S) of the construe estlastt or 5200 00 whichever Is greater, to secure the fall Dario roan at of 0t release's obligations ea described In this p graph. The matntenance guarantee security shalt also Secure falthful performance by the Developer of any obligation of .J. 4,9 Developer to do spe.1f led wort with respect to any partway maintenance assessment district Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other Improvement security described In this agreement may be released provided thct such release Is otherwise authorlted br the Subdivision Map A, t and any applicable City Ordinance 17 That the Developer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage Insurance as shall protect his and any contractor or subcontractor Performing wort covered by this aareement from cla.ac for property waeagef which may arise because of the nature of the wort or from apnrations under this a5reement, whether Such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or Indirectly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer nr ray contractor or swbcontrarror or anyone employed by Sald person$ The public liability and property damage inSurance shall list the City as additanal Insured and directly protect the City, its officers, tgeais and employees, a well as the Developer, his CcntraCtors and his subcontractor%, and all InsuranCe polities Issued hereunder Shall $0 State The minimum amounts of such Insurance shall be as follows: A Contractor's liability Insurance provtdtny bodily Injury or death liability limits of not less the 9]00,000 for each pariah and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property collie liabil- ity limits of not less than $100,ODO for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of 9 ?$0,000 for claims which may arise from the opera - tlonf Of the Developer In the performance of the wart herein provided 8 Automobile liability Insurance covering all vehicles used in the u,rforeance of tilts agreement providing bodily In$rry liability limits of not less than $200,000 for each person and $300,000 for each accident or ocrurrence, and property damage liamlrtty list is of rot less than $50,000 for each accident or occurrerce, with an aggregate of not lest the, $too, 000 .Rich pay +rife from the opera- tion$ of the Developer or his Contractor In performing the wort provided for herein 18. That before the execution of this agreement. the Developer shall file with the CI-.y a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the specified insurance Each such certificate shall bear an anddrtement precluding the cancellations, or reduction to .overage of any pallcy evidences by such Certlf Igste, before the expiration of thirty (30) days after the City shall have recntved notification by registered mail from the Insurance t wrier As erlsence of understtlding the provisions Contained herein, and or Intent to Comply with same, the Subdivider has submitted the following described Improvement sucurlty, and has affixed his signal,,@ hereto: G9 DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED -5- 70 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: 277,800 00 Name and address of surety MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: $36,900.00 Name and address of Surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATIOM Types Principal Amou•tt S 2,650.00 Mau end address of surety: uAINTEMANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: Pane and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IM WITNESS HCREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly eaacutr" and ectnowledged with all formalities required by law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures /J Date 14' , IP.EIrOy .f,'Z, :4 4 Developer gnaturp r sal F� 1' n e raUn•a i:. .' v\ ti61.M Ilrny.• ^•. y, ( G 1 Date p y a .Developer gn urn \/�Yyt�.a��: r n e Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga. California A Municipal Corporation By: Mayor Attest: y er Approved DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED -5- 70 Engfst CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING OIVISION ENCI%ACKNENT PERHIT FEE SCHEDULE for Iepro,ceent Street Date: t l: e File Re trerse: C1ty oipu OA.214 Ao- MITE: Does Not Include current in for Wilting Molt on 0.rtAtnt deposits QUANTITY UNIT ITIN PRICE ArD1NT L.F P.C.C. cure - 12• C.F 24• gutter 7.25 T� L.f P.C.C. cure - B• C.F 24• gutter 6.70 L.F P.C.C. curb only 5.50 L.F A.C. Der, 4.56 y1B5 S.F 4• P.C.C. sidewalk 1.75 4 }R5 S.F Dr1re approach 2.50 11 .96x -56- S.F B• P.C.C. Criss gutter (Inc curb) 3.40 C.Y Street eaotutim 1.50 C.Y IW,ttd ccZa,kxnt ..SL 1S ys.aoo S.F S.F Pr "Ali" a suDgr .de 0.15 3:200 -.W- TON Crushes x99. Due ICsr Inch thick) A.C. over 1300 tons) 0.03 27.00 7.71703' TON A.C. 900 to 1300 tors) 35.00 TON A.C. 500 to 900 tons) 13- 45.00 TON A.C. under 500 tons) 641.00 35.200 S.F A.C. thick) 0.55 3410 S.F. Patch A.C. (trench) .75 S.i I• thick A.C. overlay 0.30 . EA. Adjust serer SmA0, to grade 250.00 -- EA. Adjust sewer Clem out to graft 150.00 EA. Adjust rater valves to grade 75.00 _ EA. Street tights IODO.W T;wu ua- L.F Oarrlcades (Interrec $500 %ln) 1.00 L.F 2 A A• redAod header 1.75 S.F Reecral of A.C. pavement 0.35 L.F RMY&I of P.C.C. Curb 3.30 L.F Rmmal of A.C. Den 1.00 T' EA. Streit signs 200,00 EA. Reflectors and poste 35.00 L.F. Concrete block wall 25,00 ' S.F Retaining all 20,00 TON Aggregate base 7.00 C.Y Concrete structures 425.00 -- L.F III RCP (2000 00 29.00 L.F. 24' RC? 1500 35.00 L.F 36• RCP 2000 0 � 49.00 L.F 49• RCP 1200 0 76.00 EA. Catch batty I . a• 20D0,LO EA. Catch bash 1.. B' 2900.00 EA. Catch basin . 22' 4500.00 EA. Local depress lr 4 S00,pp EA. Local drpressim 12- 1000.00 EA. Junctl" structure 5000,00 EA. Outlet structure, Ste #506 1500.00 EA. Outlet struLtura, $to 0507 500.Ca EA. ward posts 40.00 L.F GUAM panel (coed) 25.00 LF Sawcut 2.00 EA. Headwall (AS- ring) 4000.00 L.F Rentood header 1.75 S.F Landscapingy i Irrigation 2.75 Li Roll curb ( P.C.C.) 7,50 73 EA Street'rees 500,00 '3703-W- ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE S 4.737.00 SUB TOTAL S 70.116.25 RESTORATIOR /DELINEAT)I)OR CASHfl:DW -0tT- CONTINGthCY COSTS 5 -Tbmm DEPOSIT IIpYUIENTATIONFSURETYE(CASN) f 2.650.00 FAITHFUL pERiDULNtE ODIO Iloolig W% . LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (509) S a0lnauanl to City of Rancho Cucle:0nga NIe1c IPa1 Code, Title 1, Chuter 1.00, adopting SM Bernudim County Code 71t)", TAAPters 1.5, 4 Cash restoration /dellneatim deposit skall be "It prior to Issumce of An En9lneering Construetlon Per,lt. im"Awor. Revised 3/04 %/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROYEMLNT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT N0. 12916 RMOd ALL HER BY THESE PRESENTS: That this apreement Is made and entered Into. In conformance with the prowlslant of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of Callforefe, and of the applicable Crdinsnces of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, "all /arnla, a municipal Corporation. by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Marlborough Development Corporation herinafter referred to as the Developer WITMESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Dovelc,er desires to develop certain real prol:rtl In said City as shown on the conditionally approved subd it i$la known as Tract No 12916; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to bi met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of Said subdirlsir- generally located at Milliken and Highland MOW, THEREFORE, It Is hereby agreed by said City and by said Dore lope. AS fo11ovs: 1 The Developer hereby agrees to corstruet at Oera looI S eePense all Improvements described on Page 6 here- of within babe months from the effective data hereof 2. This agreement shall be effective on the data of the resolutloa of the Council of said City approving this agraeven t. This agreement shall be in default on the day rallow. Init the first anniversary date of sold approval unless in eaten. Stan of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid. ad 1 The Developer may request an eaten Non of time to complete the terms hereof Such request shall be submitted to the City In writing not lass still 10 days before the eapiratlan date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the *atams ton of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions cf this agreement, Inclsding the Construction Standards, cost estimate, and laprovamaat Iacurity. and to require adjustments theroln If any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof a. If the Developer felts or neglects to comply with tie provision$ of this agreement, the Clay shall have the right As any time to cause said provisions to be not by any lawful meant, and thereupon recover frol the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and empe,se Incurred, 5. The DevSIOP T Shalt provide metered water service to each lot of said developm,-at In accordance with the rayyulatlons, schedules, and fall of the t..:_,nga Couity Water District 6. The DeveloPer shall be SPonsible for replacement. relocation, or removal of anf COOPOnant of any Irrigation water Nsy Stem in conflict with Construction of required Improvements to O Satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7 Improvements required to be constructed shall Conform to the standard Draeings and Standard Specifications of the City. rid to the Improvement Plan approved by and On file In •1- 170L a.�_ the office of the City Eeglnear. Said Improvements are tabulated on the Construction and Bond Eusmates hereby incorporated on pace d hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by nua0er The Developer shall 11:0 be responsible for Construe. tion of any transitions or o,ner Incidental work beyond the tract boun d aries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage Errors or amli Ssioni dISCOverad during conttruCtin shall be Corrected upon the d'reCtion o' the City Engineer Revised mark due to said Dl.n eadlfiCetlo ni shell be Covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured ',y the surety covering the original planned works B Construction Oermits shall be obtained by the Developer from tee office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all rogulatlOns llst,,d thereon shall be observed, with site nt Ion given to safety P'ocadures, control of dust. Potts. or other nuisance to the Area, and to proper notification of Puallec utillt lei and City Oepartf.enh failure to comply with this sect inn shall be Subject to the penittles provided therefor. 9 The Develope shalt be responsible for removal all loose ,OCRs and other debris from public rights.of.way within or adjoining said development resulting !rate work relative to said development IO Work done within existing streets Shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right t0 CO Plate any Snd all work in the event Of unjust'fied delay in comp l et Ion, and to recover alt cost and expense Incurred from the Developer and /or his cont-actor by any lawful means 11 Said Developer shall at all times fallowing dedica. tic" of the streets and aeaementa In sold subidirisian, up to the completion and acceptancO of a&Id work or Improvement by sold City Councll, give good and adequate warning to tM traveling Rua l< of u[h and every dangerous Condition ulScent In sold street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from Such defect ire or dangerous conditions Until the completion of all Improvements, heroin Incorporated on page b , to be perfoieed, mac of sold Streets not accepted as ImPrcvaments thall be under the charge of said Developer Sold Cave per may Close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a tORParAry street closure permit. Issued by the City Engineer whenever it Is necessary to protect the pub'Ic during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made 12 parks trees required to be Planted Shall be Planted by the Dove, er after other 1OPrOvemfnt work, grading and cleanup has ba completed planting shalt be done as provided by Ordinance in accordance with the Planting diagram approved by the Pty Caonunity Do,at'Onent Cerector The DAVaiOPtr shall be responsible for maintaining all tees Planted in goad health until the and of the yyuarantaed later aalntanarce period, or for one year after planting, whlcheear is 13. The Developer Is esponsible for meeting all Condi. tfonf oltabltshed by the City Pursuant to the Subdivision Nap Acts city Ordiances, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance Of all Imp'oremants conetructld thereunder until the IaPravement Is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no Improvement Securltr provided hr alnwith Shall be released beta re Such Acceptance un.est otherwise provided and authorized •g- 73 by the Vty Council of the City le, This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been re listed by the City, or until a new agreerent Loget or with the requ t red leprovement security has been submitted to the City by I vucc4ssor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council sate has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security therefor has bean released 15. The leprovement security to be furnished by z Oe-si oper with this agreement shall consist of the following and snsii be In a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1 A bond or bonds by one or more duty authorized corporate sureties In the form and content ipeclfled by Government Code Sectia, 66199 1 2 An Improvement Security Instrument in the fore and content specified by the City attorney. 3 A deposit with the _1ty of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies 6. To secure W orers and materialmon: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties In the foes cno content specified by Government Code Section 66199.1. 2, An Improvemant Security Irstruaant in the form and content specified by th3 City Attorney. 3 A depnsit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C A Cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears uprn the Final Map for the se ttInqq of all boundary, lot comer and street Canterllre monuments and for lurnishInI Ithe tie notes to the City The amour of the depaslt may be any aaoun• Wild by the engln: r or surveyor as AcCe• payment In full: or, if no value Is submit- a cash bond shall be as shown on the Constru and Amend Estimate contained heroin Said cash deposit may be refunded as seen r 'nce- durs permits after receipt by the City t the centerlina tie notes and written assurance of payment in full from the engineer or surveyor. D The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof arm sat forth was page 6 of this agreement. 16. The Developer warrant, that the Improvements descr l bed In this =ant shall be free from defects In materials and workmanfntp. Any and all portions of the Improve- ments found to be Iefective within one (1) year following the data on which the Improvement• are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaces by Developer free of all charges to the City. Tree OOvOI-per shall furnish a olotenanta guarantee security In a sum equal to ten percent (1011 of the construction estloste or $200. JD whichever Is ,eater, to secure the Faithful performance of Ceveloper-s obligati Ins as described In this para. IThe maintenance gusrantee security shall also secure the faithful performance DY the Oeve toper of any obligation of the Developer to do Spec l Tied work with respect to any parkway maintenance assessment district. Once the Improvements have been accapted and a maintenance guar:ntee security has been accepted _3. 71/ by the City. the other Improvement Security described In this ogre ,sent may be released provided that such release Is otherwise euthorlted by the Subdivision Map Act ani any applicable City Ordinance. 17 That the Developer shall take out and maintain such Public liabl,lty and properly damage Insurance AS shall protect him and .ny contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may ar Ise because of the nature of the work or from operations under this agrattent, whether such operations be by hiss elf or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or Indirectly employ7ed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the nngllgence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public liability and property damage Insurance Shall list the City as adOltanal Insured AnJ directly protect the City, Its OfflCtrS, agents and onployess. as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all Insurance policies Issued '#rounder shall fn state. The minimum amounts of such In ;rant* shall bf as follow: A. Contractor's Ilse l llty Insurance prow dlnp bodily In J wry or death liability limits of not lea the 3700,000 for each person and 31,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage Ilabil- Ity limits of not lass than 3100,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggro ate limit of 3250.000 for claims which may arise iron the opera. tions of the Developer In the performance of the work herein provided B. Automobile liability Insurance covering all vehicles used In the performance of this agreement providing bodily Injury liability limits of not less then 3200,000 for each person and $300,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage Meet llty limits of not less than $30,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not 1092 than 3100,000 which may arise from the op,ra. tions of the Developer or his Contractor in performing the work provided for herein 18. That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer Shall fill with the City a certificate or certificates Of Ins, once cover Ing the specified Insurance Each such certificate [hail bear an endorsement precluding the cancellations, or reduction In coverage of any policy evidences by such certificate before the eepiratlon of thirty (30) days after the City &hail have received notification by registered tall from the Insurance carrier, As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and Of Intent to comply with tame, the Subdivider has submitted the f ollowing described Improvement security, and has afflaed his signature hereto: '7s FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: 5106,000.00 RANG and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: S 542000.00 Name and address of Surety: CASH DEPOSIT M06UMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: S 3.600.00 name and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the peril#$ hereto have caused these pros ants to be duly executed and actnpei#dged with eel formalities required by lax en the dates set forth opposite their signatures MARLDORCO EVELOP v�. CORPORATION Date 10114/AS b .RA Devaloptr q f r4 e P.11 N. Drrnnn. Vlrn Prrelrane Date rnn uea by a etC y : �,t�� Developer qna ure Dolores N. O'Drlan Secretor n a Accepted: City 0f Ranrho Cupeeongr. Califs nla A Mtn binal fnrmorltlnn CONPO"I'll ACMNOMtOOYENT Stated CallEMIN u COUme e1 tm An-d-, OfyICD1L SEAL yr� rAr D W RAMS - It r aamu l' tC LKIIU CSmn F mwA eMn V IL IND rZ a• On N." 16t1Wy of October is 65 before y Far D. MacAeva iul t b lyrnei D weeand Dolores N O'Brien LYDe.ro':Mrtnonn teW -• O powO bloc en W mYaN Um4sbry enaancs bmWpnoNy mne nKNadW enhb enou,,nla Vice Pree dent and Becre ten -DMIWI eIW reryvtlbrdhrMn neMO. VM Kano�hdCao b W MI W telDnalM hassled M QUANTITY UNIT En9Est PRICE AMOUNT CITY OF RAMCHO CLICAMOBGA P.C.C. curb - I2• C.F N• gutter EIREWERIMG DIVISION ?` L./ EXROACI Kr PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE far IeProvemnt: Street Date: 9-4-05 mWU y: a File Re <nnce: IR 12936 City Ord rg 0.50 MOTE: DNS not Include current fee for 4• P.C.C. sidewalk writing Penh Or Pavement deposits QUANTITY UNIT ITEM PRICE AMOUNT L.F P.C.C. curb - I2• C.F N• gutter 7.25 ?` L./ P.C.C. curb • 8• C.F 24• gutter 6.00 A711fiAf"' L.F P.C.C. Curb Only 5.50 L.F A.C. ben 0.50 S.F 4• P.C.C. sidewalk 175 - 4THZSd- T�4Z[f S.F Drive approach EEO ID�96i�W- S.F B' P.C.C. cross gutter (Inc. curb) 7.00 C.T street excavation 1.50 Vrtp ration 0.15 TSB S.f ofmseub4rade 3y-4W��Oy 78!(0X' SA ruched Agg. bate (per inch thick) 0.07 S.SZU.W TOY .C. a," 1300 tons) 27.00 ON A.C. 900 to 1300 tons) 35.00 TON A.C. 50D to 900 tans) 11' 45.00 TOM A.C. under 500 tons) 60.00 S.F A.C. thick) O.SS 2565' S.F Patch A.C. (trench) 1.75 S.F 1• thick A.C. Overpay 0.30 EA. Adjust sewer manhale to grade 250.00 EA. Adjust snrtr clean out to grade 150.00 EA. Adjust water valves to grade 75.00 �- [A. Street lights IOOD.00 '9.6:06- L.F. Barricades (Intersec. $500 min) 1.00 _ L.F 2 a 1• redwood header 1 75 $.F Reaaval of A.C. payment 0.35 L.F Removal Of P.C.0 curb 1.30 L.F Remval 01 A.C. ben 1.00 EA. Street signs 200.00 --ED W- EA. Reflectors and posts 35.00 L.F Concrete block wll 25.00 S.F Retaining wall 20.00 ON Aggregate base 7,00 C.Y Concrete structures 425.00 L.F 18• RCP (2000 D 29.00 L.F N• RCP (2300 0 35.00 L.F 36• RCP 0 49.00 Li 48' PCP ((2000 1200 0 76.00 -� EA. Catch basin M • 4' 2000.00 EA. Catch basin g • S' 2900.00 _ EA. Catch basin R • 22 4500.00 CA. Local depression 4' SOD.00 EA. Local depression 12' 1000.00 EA. Nutio" structure 5000.00 EA. Outlet structure, Std #506 1500.00 EA. Outlet structure, Std 0501 500.00 EA. Gu and posts 40.00 l.F Guard panel (wood) 25.00 L.F Sawcut 2.00 -- EA. Headwall (48• wing) 4000.00 L.F Redwood Mader 1.75 S.F L"Scapinqq R Irrtga V 2.70 L.F. Roll curb (P.C.C.` 7 SO 555_ EA StmetTreek 100.00 } ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE S 4,445.00 SUB TOTAL S 98.070.50 RE STCRAT ION/OEL I NEAT 104 CASH$ I -an.m CONTINGENCY COSTS y DEPOSIT (REFUNOABIE) $ 3600 00 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (IOD%1Si "DOCUMENTATION SURETY (CASH) LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (508) S 'Pursuant to City of Rancho Cucamp094 XMICIPa1 Code, Title 1, Chapter 1.08, adopting Sons Bernardino Canty Code Titles, Chapt" 1 -5, 4 Cash restoration /delineation deposit shall be made prior to issuance of an Engineering Construction Penit. Revised 3/84 *77 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT NO. 12977 KNOW ALL HER BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agqreement is mado and entered Into, in conformance With the provisions of the Subdivision nap Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinincef of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and bepwefn Say City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and KAUFKIA MO [ROAD Oi SOUINERa GIIFORAIA, EMC. her aina er referred o as e eve opor WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said alley as oho., an the conditionally approved subdivision known as Tract No 12:37;and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Deve Upar as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located at Illiliken north east of Highland. ""' THEREFORE. it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Develo.er as follows: 1 Tne Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expanse all Improvoents described on Page 6 here• of within twelve months from the effective data hereof 2 This agreement Shalt be effective an the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this ag roe. ant. This agreement shall be In default on the day follow- ing "a first Anniversary date of said approval unless an e%ten. s ion of time has both granted by sold City as hereinafter provid. ed j The Developer may request an extension of time to Complete the taros hereof Such request shall be submitted to the City in writing not less than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shalt contain a statement of circumstances necefsiteting the extension of time. The City Shalt have the right to review the ProwillOnS of this agreement, Including the Conftructlon standards, cost estimate, and improvement sec.rit Y. and to require adjustments therein if say substantial Change has occurred during the term hereof e If the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provlflonf of this agreement, the City shall have the rlyht at any time to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and expense Incurred S. The Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot of sold development In accordance with the reyyulstlons, Schedules, and feet of the Cucamonga County Water Off tr ict 6 The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any Component of any Irrigation water system In conflict with construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system 7 Improvements required to be constructed shall I. 7Y conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City. and to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file In the office of the City Engineer Said improvements are tabulated on the Construction and band Estimate, hereby incorporated on bg f hereof, Te Developer as r shade also responsible Yore construc. y number. Lion of any transitions or other Incidental work beyond the tract s boundaries as headed for afety Ind proper surface drainoga. Error$ or omissions dlscrvered during constructin shall De corrtcted upon the direction of the City Engineer Revised wort due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the or iglsal planned warts 6 Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer free the office of the City Engineer prior to start or work; all regulations listed thereon shall of observed, with attention given to safety procedures, contr+k of dust, nolse or ether nuisance tr the area, and to proper notification o1 puallc 01 ties and City Pepartments, rallure to comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor g The Developer shall be responsible for renoval of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to said development. 10. Mork done within existing streets shall be dl t lgantly pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and 411 work In the event of unjustified delay In completion. and to recover all cost and upenas Incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means 11. Said Developer shall at 411 times following dedlca- tion of the streets and easements In said subldiaifi on, up to the camplatien and acceptance , said work or Improvement by sold Clt) Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous Condition existent In said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous cordlt/om Until the ccmpletion of all improvements, herein Incorporated an Page 6 . to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as Improvements shalt be undo the charge of said Developer Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a temporary strut closure permit, Issued by the City Engineer, whenever It Is necessary to protect the pubs It during the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be made 12 Parkway trees raquired to be planted shall be planted ty the Developer after other improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed PIS nt leg shell be done as provided by Ordinance In accordance with the slanting diagram approved by the City Community DerelOPmeMt Director, The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees plant id In good health until the end -f the quvanteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is later 13. The Developer Is responsible for meeting all coral. dons titatllshed by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Nap Act, City D,diances, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance o1 all improvements constructed thereunder until the Improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, -2- 99 and no laprovement security provided herelnwith shall b• released bef ere such acceptance un Les otherwise provided and authorised by the City Council of the City. 11 This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been rolmesed by the City. or until a new agreement together with the required improvement security his been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution Of the City Council fame has been acrepted, and this 49rement and the improvement security therefor has been released 15. The Improvement security to be furnished by the Develop with this agreement shall consist of the following and shell bd in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. TO secure faithful performance of this agreement 1 A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorised Corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66691, 1 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the farm and content specified by the City Attarney. D. A deposit with the City of money or negpt Lbl• bonds of the kind approved for securlrg deposits of Public monlas. B To secure laborers and matorialaen: 1 A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties In the roan and content specified by Government Code Section 66199 1 2 An Improvement Security Instrument In the form and content specified by the City Attorney. D. A deposit with City of money or negotiable ends of the kind soproved for Securing C A Cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer td the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears ,pan the final Nap for the Ttn of all boundary, lot corner, and street in• monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by Ina engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, if no value Is Submitted, the cash bond Shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein Said Cash deposit may De refunded n soon a; peace• du re permits after reDefpt by the City of the Cemterline tie notes and written assurance of payment In full from the engineer or surveyor D The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement 15. The Developer warrants that the tape OVeme is defcrib d In this agreement (hall be free Rom defects ., aAterla:t and workmanship Any and all portions of the improve. mentl found t0 be defective within one (1) year fa110win the data on which the Improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Developer shalt furnish a maintenance guarantee Security In A sue equal to ten Percent (10%) of the construction estimate or 3200.00, whichever Is gqreater, to secure the faithful performance of Developer's ob 111 Allan$ as described In this Para. graph The maintenance guarantee security Shall alto secure the fait haul performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do spec lfied wort with respect to any parkway -D. do maintenance assessment district Once the improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvement security described in this agreement may he released provided that such release is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision map act and any applicable City Ordinance 17. that the Developer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage Insurance as shall protect his and any contractor or subcontractor performing wort Coveral by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise be au to of the nature of the wort or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or Ind irectty employed by said persons, even thougl: Such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons. The public llablllt77 and property damage Insurance shall list the City it additanel insured and directly protect the City. Its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all Insurance policies issued hereunde- shall so state The minimum an"nts of such insurance shall be as follows: A. Contractor -t liability Insurance provldlnl bodily Injury or death liability limits of not all the $700,000 for each person and S1.DOO.000 for each accident or occurrence. and property damage 11ab11- Ity limits of not less than 5100,000 for e¢h acci- dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of 5250,000 for Claims which may arise from the opera. times of the Developer In the performance of the wort herein provided 8 Automobile liability Insurance covering all vrhlCle{ used In the performance of this agreement t oviding bodily Injury liability Ica l to of not less in an $200,000 for each person and $700,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage tilblii ty limits of not lets then SS0,000 for each ace idtnt or occurrence, with an a9 regate of not less than $100,000 which may arise iron the opera. tions of the Developer or his Con rector in performing the work provided for hirefn 18. That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City p certificate or certificates of Im ranLt corer inq the specified Insurance Each such certlfluate sMll Daar an endorsement precluding the cancellations, or reduction in coverage of an policy evidences by such certlfic,te, before the expiration mfr thirty (30) days after the City shall have received notification by reg'stered mail from the tnsuranct carrier. As evidence of understaodlnq the provisions Contained her and of Intent to cowply with same, the Subdivider has submlttea the following described Improvement security, and has affixed his 0o hereto: g/ G4 � b � -11 FAITHFUL PERFORMARCE Type: Principal Amount: S12S,600.00 Name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LA804 PRIME Type: Prin Cipal Amount: S 62,800.00 Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMEMTATION Type: Principal Amount: s 4,200.00 Nave and address of surety: RAINTERANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE By THE CITT IN NITRESS HEREOF, the parties hereto bare caused these formalities requireduly hy lava oe tee dates set nforth OR.O S ltee their signatures Date .L// •Y r9Vrfey ��../fr? ♦��r� ,7 ,OSretoDer rgnr uyf �YnM.Gi ! r' n' r�F.rJr .1c e a Date — D,r ------------- ST9—Sturc .Developer r n e Accepted City Of Rancho Cucamongs, California A municipal Corporation By: Mayor Attest: y er Approved: DEVELOPER-S SIGNATURE MJST BE NOTARIZED 9A .S. En9[st CITE DE 9A4[MO MCMLPCA ENGINEERING DIVISION E9CROKME9T PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE For Iscrovenent• Street Date: eyut y' . ee File -Clarence: CIeT Draving NOTE: Does rot include Current IN far vrltin9 perelt or paveiient deposits Ol'YTITT VMT ITEM PAICO AMOUNT L.F P.C.0 curb - 12• C.F 24- gutter 7.75 ,mom_ T. F7T- L.F P.C.[ curb - 6' C.F 24• gutter 6.00 l.F P.C.0 curb only 'DSO _ iS�1- - S S.F a- P.CC sldevalk 1.75 ULr SF or lee apprch a 0.00 S.F L• P.C.C. cross gutter lira. curb) -_ C.Y Strait WOW 1.50 QT Forted eibantx'et 1.50 iT7GT S.F Preparation of Subgrade 0.15 SOS y S.F Crushed ag9. bast low Inch thick) TOR A.C. bier 1700 tom) 77.00 ION A.C. to 1700 tons) 75.00 Tom '970 A.c. 500 to 900 tons) 15.00 TOY A.C. under 600 tons) 60.00 "Sydf S.F A.C. 11• Wes) S.F. Paten A.C. (trench) 1.75 S.F I• thick A.C. overlay 0.70 [A. Adjust 14,411 Manhole to grass 250.07 EA. Ad4ust SMr Clem 150.00 EA. Adjust voter Valves sto grad e 75 0 EA. Strait lights 1000.013 l.F Barricades (IntersK. S500 sin) 1.00 -- L.F 2 a a- fedveod header 1.7S S.F Removal of A.0 Pavement 0.15 l.F Removal of P.C.C. Mb 3.3D -- L.F Removal of A.C. bsM T EA. Street signs 20000 �.OD- [A. Reflectors and pints OS 00 -� L.F Concrttt bloc! Mall S.F Retaln'ng wall 20.00 -� -� TOY Aggregate Data 7.00 C.Y Concrete structures 125.00 L.F Ill. RCP (2000 0) 29.00 L.F 24- RCP (21500 D) 75.00 L.F 16• RCP 12000 D) 49.00 -� L.F 48• RCP (1200 D) 76.00 EA. Catch basin M • a' EA. Catch basin Y • B' 2000,00 -_ [A. Catch basin Y • 22' 4500.00 EA. total depression P 500.00 �- EA. Local deprtfslon 12' 1000.00 [A. ,Unction structure 5000.00 [A. outlet structure. Std aSO6 IS00.00 EA. Outlet structure. sea #507 500.00 -� EA. Guard Posts 40.00 L.F Guard goal (.mod) 25.00 -� L.F SaKut 2•001 -� EA. Ikadvall (48' vIng) 4000.00 � - l.F Red.00d header 1 75 S.F LandSCQInyy L Irrigation 2.75 L.F Roll curb (P.C.C.) 7 SO 68 EA. Street Trees Too 00 MIMERIMG INSPECTION FEE S 9449.00 SUB TOTAL $114,186.94 RESTORATION[DELINEATIOR CASH f 1.000.00 CONTIRGFNtT COSTS yy 416. S DEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE) M0T NmTAl SURETY FAITHFUL pERfCRNA10E 8010 (1001) . . CASH) f 4 700.00 LABO, Alm MATERIAL BOND (501) s- 6%6060- ."umt to City of Rancho Cucamonga Iknlcitsl Cade. Title 1, Chyty 1.08, adopting San Bernardlro County Code Titles, UuPtars 1.5, Cash rtstoratlon /dalintatlae deposit shall be wd prior to Issuance of an EA21IPering Cc ntructbn Permlt. �'M� Revised 3154 Y.3 v CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT NO 12978 KNOW ALL MEN By THESE PRESENTS: that this ayregiment 1s made and entered Into. In conformance with the 111,11 on, of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordlntnces of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and Marlbnrough Development Corporation hereinafter referred to as the Developer HITMESSETH: THAT. WHEREAS, said Developer dealres to develop Certain real property In said City as shown un the conditionally approved suldlvlslon known as Tract Me 12978; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer a3 pror a qulstte to approval of said subdly i NOn generally loc -.ad at Mllllken Av anua and Highland Street NOW, THEREFORE, It Is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1 The Developer hereby agrees to construct ae Developer's expense all improvements described In Page 6 here Of within tvatve months from the effective data hereof 2 This agreement shall be effective an the date of the reaulutic, of the Council of slid City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be to d•rault on the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of laid pProval unless an exten- SIC of time has baen granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. j The Developee may request an tatensimn of time t0 complete the terms hereof Suct request shell be submitted to the City 10 writing not less than 70 days before the expiration data hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necesa Mating the extension of time The ^Ity shall have the right to review the pros,sloni of this agreement. Including the const'uttlon standards, cost of tl mate, and improvement security, and to require adjustments therein If any substantlal change has occurred during the tae* hereof e If the Developer falls or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shell have the rlyqht At any tine to Cause said provltlons to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the fu,l cost and expense incurred S. The Developer shall provide metered mate, service to each lot of said development In accordance with the rugulations, schedules, and feet of toe CuunOnga County Water District 6 The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of Sly component of ant, irrigation rater system to conflict with canstructlOn of required Improvements to the satlsfactlon of the rlty Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7 Improvements required to be constructed shell 8Y -I- conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement plan approved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer, Sold Improvements are tabulated an the Cons true ttan and Bond Estimate, hereby incorporated an page 6 hereof, a: taken from the Improvement plans llsteA thereon by nutter The Developer shall also be responsible for conttruc. tion of any transitions or other Incidental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage Errors or ommissions discovered during tonstructln shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Englneer Revised work due to sold Plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planed works. B, Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of thi City Engineer prior to start of wort; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with anent ton given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification Of public utillt Its and City Departments. Failure to Ccaply Ytth this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose ;Oct$ and other debris from public rights- cf•way within or adjoining said development resulting fro+ work relative. to said development 10 Mork done within erleting streets shall be diligently pursued to camplet Ion; tAe C1tY shall have the right t0 complata any and all work to th0 event Of Onjuttified da•sy In completion, and to recover as, cost and expense Incurred from the Developer and /or his centrartor by any lawful scans 11 Said Developer shall at all times following dedlca- tion of the streets and easements In sold subldlvislon. up to the coop lotion and tccaptanet of sold work or Improvement by said City Council, girt good and adequate warning to the travel ingV public of etcA and every dangerous candle ion ealstant In me10 street or casement, and will protect the traveling public from such defee if we or dangerous candttfpns until the completion of all Improvements. herein Incorporated on Page 6 , to be performed, so CA of sold •trash not accepted as ImPr OUtmenta shall be undo the charge of said Developer Said Developer ROY close all or a portion of any Street subject to tht con dltrl0ns contained In a tlpporary Street cloture permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever It is necessary to protect the Public during the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be side 12 Parkway trots required to be planted shall be Planted by the Developer lifter other Improvement work, grading and cleanup has been coao:eted Planting shall be done as prow ided by Ordina +ce In ¢cordanca with the planting diagram approved by the City Comunity Development Dl rector The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees planted fn good health until the end of the gquaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, whichever is later. Id. The Developer It responsible for meeting all condi- tions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Nap fat. City Ordlanees, and this agrerment for the development, and for the maintenance of all Improvements constructed thereunder until the Improvement IS accepted for maintenance by the City. .2- 8.f and ns bore•NOW security provided here+nvlth shall be released be Pore such nrept ante unless Otherwlfe prOrldtO and autharlted by the City Ccuncli of Ina Cf tY. 14 This agreesest shall not term Hate until the nal 6 tenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been r elm a sad by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required ImprOveatnt security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council same fees been accepted, and this agreement and the Lproremerat a CurltY therefor has been related l6. Dow The improvement security to be furnished by the eloper with this agreement shalt consist of ens following and shall be +n a form acceptable by the Clty Attorney; A. To secure faithful performance of this 4greemant 1 A bond or bands by one or more duty authoritad Corporate suretlat in the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1 2 An tmprovement security Instrument in the farm and Content specified by Ste city Attorney. 3 A deposit with the City 0, money or ne91tlabte bonds of the kind aporored far t,curing deposits of public monies 6. To Secure laborers and eatery Len: 1 A bond or bonds by pie 01 mare duty authorized corporate sureties In the Pore and content 2 An Improvement Securitti Code letrument pin 66499 1 fora 3 nn content Adeposit wit ' h City of thmoneyY o ttnegotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C A cash deposit with the C+tf to guarantee Cayment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose Carttrlcata appears upon the Final Map for the saIt"y ci all boundary. lot corner, and street Con lno monuments and for furnishing centerline the til vaY be a any amountlCertified amount byn the engt eerpt or surveyor as ¢ceptable payment In full; ar, if no value Is submitted, the cash bond thatI be as shown On the Construction and Bond Esttate Contained herein Sold cash deposit may be refunded rs soon as peace. due* pare Its after reCetpt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written Issue& Ce Of Payment in eat If IN the engineer or surveyor D thereof Bare eset bond, orth on pageh6 ofrtatepagreemou`ts described In this Developer warrants that she Improvements s agreement Shall be free fees defects In materials an0 warkgnship Any and Alt portions of the Improve. vents found to bey defective within one (1) Year faI1001.q the data an which the "Proreefnts are accepted by the City snail be repo' fit Or replaced by Da.floner Irre of all Charges '0 the City The Developer shall furnish a me'nteesoce guarantee security in a sue equal to ter percent (10%) of the construction estimate of 5200.00 whiCherrr is greater, to secure the faithful graph Performance of Oueioper's oblig4t pOAS as described In this Cara - graph The ginten arse guarantee Secant; thall also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any Obligation of the Developer to do tpeC fled wort with respect to any parkway .3. 94 maintenance assessment district Once the :mpreytments have been accepted and a maintenance ouarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other improvement security described In this agreement ,ay be released provided that such Meese is otherwise authorized by the Subdivision Nap Act and any applicable City Ordinanar. 17. That the Developer Shalt take out and maintain such Public liability and property damage Insurance as shall protect him and spy contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claim$ for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by sold persons, even though such damages be net caused by the negligence Of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons The public 11ap111tY and property damage Insurance shall list the City as addle ,at Insured and directly protect the City. its officers, endr hi and subcontractors, well and a% atlhe tmm�ncar,poltci es trlssuad hereunder shall w state The min Got Amounts of such Insurance shall ere as follows A. Coatractor 1 liability Insurance provldin bodily Injury or death liability limits Of not lets the 5700,000 for mac% person and SI.000.030 far each accident Or occurrence, and property damage llabll. Ity limits of not less than S100,000 for each acts. dent or occur ranca with an aggregate limit of 5250,000 for cietms which may arise 710m the opera. tie's Of tht Da veloper In the performance Of the wore herein provided B. Automobile liability Insurance covering all vehicles used In the performance Of snit agreement Providing bodily Injury liability limits of net leis than $200,000 for each person and S300,000 for each accident or occurrence, and Prepare,, damage liability limits of not lass than $50.000 for each accident or occurrence with en aggregate of rot sus than $100,000 which may arise from the opera. tloni of the Developer ar his Contractor In Performing the work provided for %train IB That before the eaecutlon of this agsement, the DavelOPer Shall file with the City a certificate or Hrti /II tai of insurance Covering the specified Insurance Cat% such certificate shall bear an $ %bars ement pre<lu Each the cancellations, C reduction Ir. car swage of any policy evidences by such carat it eta, before the Ospfratian of thirty (It) days gilrlrOSe their% s %all nave received notification by r,gist awed Suva... carrier As evidemcO Of underatarding the provisions Contained herein, and of intent to comply with sue, the Subdivide, has submitted the following described Improvement secure y, and has afflaed his s-gnature hereto: g7 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: S139,60O.OU "see and address of surety: MATERIAL AN. LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: S 69,800.00 Name and add•ast of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Principal Aaeunt: S 4,000.00 haae and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: ,jr, and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BT THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Parties hereto have Caused these Pre a ents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all fora fillet required by law on the dates got forth Opl Delta their Cigna t .,as }yGN LOPMBNT CORPORATION Date •0/14/95 b --TT/1R %j _ ,Developer —b ge m use. ° Paul N. DEC.... Vice Prmaident Date 10/14/95 10 /l4 /BS 0� ^I/L+cGp ,Deralopar gna Pre DOl.re• M. O'Brian. 6acreb rV ir n e Accepted City cf Rancho Cucamonga, Callfornla A Municipal Career.,'.. CORPOMATC ACKNOWLCDOMB T swam Califomla is r<wnnm 3 ^s As ^relit Im aatan man aa� aa.w RI 14 19 e. O.wam's 16tlbgpl Otcobtr le NS WIOn,M 1Fay D. Kotbi ly , PiWlt ba0jmet eilJ'w'apaunrKwmae Dolores M. O'Brien ma.vwhys wwm C Pn"aabrw MWla paua el KVPKIaM1 artlaKa b Vice Pre Ben pa.a'(almha araMgUN w1aw11 Ma1MNnl as dent and Seers Cary ...,,, bafWmManPpnlbn Min CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 90. 12939 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this aqraeeent Is made and entered Into, in conformance with the provis/ane of the Su bdivlsion Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the Clty, and Marlborough Development Corporation hereinafter referred to as the Developer WITNESSETH: THAT. WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property) In said City as shown on the conditionally approved wbdl vision anown as Tract No 12939: and WHEREAS, sold City has established certain requirements to be not by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located at Mliliten and Haven Avenues NOW, THEREFORE, It Is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1 The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all improvements described on Page 6 here. of within twelve months from the effective date hereof 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the reseluticn of the Council of said City approving this agreement This agreement shall be in default on the day follow- 1 119 the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten- sion of tine has been granted by said City as hereinafter provid- ed. 3 The Oavolopar may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof Such request shall be submitted to the City In writing not less than 30 days before the expiration do.• hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time The City shall have the r l g ht to review the provisions of this agreement, Including the construction standards, cost estimate, anw Improvement security, and to require adjustments therein If any subst antlaI change has occurred during the tern hereof a. If the Developer foils or neglects to comply with the provisions of this ayreemaht, the City shall have tOe right at any time to cause a, d provisions to be met by any lawful mess, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and expanse Incurred S. The Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot of said development In accordance with the a atfons, schedules. and fees of the Cucamonga County Water Olstrg ct 6 The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation. or removal of any component of any Irrigation water system In conflict with construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7 Improvements requlrvd to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Driving% as Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by amd on file In .I- W51 the office of the City Engineer. Said Improvements are tabulated on the Construction and Bond Estimate, hereby Incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the fmOror amant Dials listed thereon by mum Der. The Developer small also be responsible for construC- lion of :my transitions or other Incldantal work beyond the tract boon lad es as needed for safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or ommfsslano discovered during canstructfn shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions Of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original Planned marks 6 Construction permits shall be obtained by the 0e141OPer from the Office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon Shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area. and to proper notification Of public unlit lee and City Departments lallu a to Comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties prorldod therefor. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -ray withlt or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to said development. 10. York done within existing Streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay In comp l *lion. and to recover all cost and expense Incurred from the Developer and /Or his contractor by any lawful means 11 Said Developer shall et all times /o`Ipwing dedica- Sion of the streets and easements In Bald subfdty Ilion. up to the completion and acceptance of sa10 work or Improvement by said Cllr Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling pub lc of each and every dangerous condition existent In said street or easement, and will protect the traveling public free such defective or dangerous conditions Until tea cempletion Of all Improrem*nts. herein Incorporated on Page 6 . to be perf Caned. each of said streets not accepted as Improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer. Said Dove) 0per may close all or a portion of any street subject to the Conditions contained In a temporary street closure permit. Issued by the City Engineer, whenever It Is necesslry to protect the Public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made. 12 Partway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other improvement mark, grading and cleanup has been completed Planting shall be done as prowl dad by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community 0. I went Director. The Developer shall be responsible for maintaining all trees planted In good health until the aid of the quarante*d maintenanco period. Or for one year after planting, whichever 1s later 17. The Developer Is responslble for meetlnq all condi- tions established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Nap Act, City ONtancas, and this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all this, constructed thereunder until the Improvement is accepted for maintenance by the City, and n0 Improvement securlty provided hereinmlth shall be released oefera such acceptance unless Otherwise provided and Authorized -2- MI by the City Council of the City. le This agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has bean raleesed by the City, or until a nee agreement t09other with the required loprovement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to V. herein named, and by resolution of i4e Ctty Council xaae has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security therefor has been released. 15 the improveaant security to be furnished by the Dote toper with this agre'went shall consist of the following and shall bs in a /urm acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement 1 A Fond or bonds by one or r.ra duly authorized corporate sureties In the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1 2 An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content Specified by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money or natotl able bands of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies B. To secure laborers and matertalmen: 1 A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties In the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1 2 An Improvement SCCU-ity Instrument In the form and content specified by the City Attorney. 3 A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears open the Final Yap for he settlnq of all boundary, lot corner, and street centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount Certified by the engineer or surveyor es acceptable payment In full; or, if no value Is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein Said cash deposit may be refunded as seen as proce. lure permits after recolot by the City of the canterline tie notes and written assurance of payment In full from the engineer or surveyor D. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are sat forth on page 6 of this agreement 15. The Developer warrants that the improvements described In this agreement shall be free from defects In materials and workmanship Any and all portions of the Improve. ments found to ba detective within one (1) year following the data on which the Improvements are accepted by the City shall be Dave repaired or r;plaeec by oiler free of all tharges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security In a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction estimate or 5200.00, whichever is gnaw, to secure the faithful performance of Developer- s obli gallons is described in this pare- Kaph The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance b7 the De nloDer of any obligation of the Developer to do spat tied were with respect to any partway malnttnance assessment district. Once the Inprov eve a Is have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee S* -urlty has been accepted .3_ 9/ by the City, the other Improvement security described in this Ag eemamt may be released provided that such rrleate is other..se a uthoric ed by the Subdivision Map Act and by ap011uD1t City OrJlnance 17. That the Developer shat tale out and maintain such public liability and property damage insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor perforainy work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which me) arise because of the nature of the wort or from operations under this agreement. whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or Ind] rattly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Daveloper or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons The yublic liabllit) and property damage Insurance shall list the City as additonal Insured and directly protect the City. Its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all Insurance policies issued hereunder shall so state the minimum amounts of such Insurance shall be as follows: Contractor's liability Insurance prorldlny bodily Injury or death 1lability limits of not lass the $300,000 for each person and $1,000,000 far each accident or occurrence, and property damage liabll- Ity limits of not lass than 3100,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of $250,000 for claims which may arlsa from the opera- tions of the Developer In the performance o/ the work herein provided. Automobile liability Insurance coverfog all vehicles used In the performance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability its its of not less than $200,000 for each person and $300,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $50.000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than $100,000 which say arise Eros the opera- tions of the Developer or his Contractor in performing tea wort provided for herein 10 That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of Insurance covering the specified Insurance Each such certificate shall pear an endorsement precluding the cancellations, or reduction In coverage of any policy evidences by such certificate. before the expiration of thirty (30) days after the City shall hive received notification by registered mail from the Insurance Carrier As evidence of understanding the provisions Contained herein. and of Intent to comply with same, the Subdivider has submitted the following described Improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: .A- 9.2 FAITHFUL PERFORMABLE Type: Principal Amount: $85,000.00 Name and address rf surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: 517,500.00 Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT RONUMENTATION Type Principal Amount: S 2,950.90 Hama and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type•. Principal Amount: Mame and aJdresr of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN NITNESS HEREOF, the Partin hereto have Caused then oral ornllttes required duly lase on the dates set nforth gopposite htMir signatures MA�LWROCpN MTCLOFNENi CORPORATION Data Oyu .f /f;/ Developer Pam A. Brrnas. Ptca President Data 14 /zl:- by _ 'f Developer gnat Cara Dolores M. O'Brien, Secretary r n e Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A HUMICIPAl Corporation By: Mayor Attest: r er Approved: DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE RUST BE WANIEEO •S- 93 6"CITT Or RA1010 CUCP640W11 - l. IIIGIOfrRIMI OI5ISIO..4 L: ESTIHAIC Or COST TMTIPKIM Tract 12919 WE 7.7.85 LOCATI03 en H.5 VVW 0LT11 WIN Nrlmmah Utt. Corn. ��- IiLIHE1R _ WTI and reraeun. Inc. AMITY MIT ITT" P41C[ _ NOWT FNGIREERII& INSPECTION FEE 17.9 O.oI SOS TOTAL 74 4. ' 60 •21MRATIOWELIREATIOS CASH - COOTINGERCT COSTS ' t6 y DEPOSIT (AEPUNORBLEI FAITHFUL PUFOINIACE 111"0 (FOP -) - F.twoT10- HORipENTATiON 544ETT (CASH) 2 10 LABOR AM MTUIAL 6080 (50%) - e7',m"r -&;rsumt to City of Rancho Cut A MunlCipal Code, Title 1, Chapter 1,00, aSSpting San etrmrdim County Code Titles, Chapters 1 -S, b Clsh restoration /dAllmttlm 4,Mtt shall be made Prim to Issuance at an Engineering Comtructlm Penit. Reviled 7/64 1?v L.r P.C.C. Curb - 12• C.f 21• gutter 7,2S IA95 L.r L.F P.C.C. cure ' go C.F 24• gutter Y.C.G. cure .1, 6.00 I .team L.r A.C. ben 5.50 / R)L alt IJs V.Tli'SP •,a S.F Orl r aDDreaN � 5.1 a• P.C.C. Cans gutter lift. Curb) 7. 0 C.T Street tata'atlm 1. SO l6 C.T S.r lemparted n r bNtnt 1.50 -_> S.F Preparation of subgnde Crushed 479, base (per Inch lhlck) 0.15 - i:T470050- - TON A.C. o'er 1700 tons) 0.07 YL7r.w MOD tat A.C. 900 to 1)00 tons) 75.00 Tat A.C. S00 to 900 ton Af.aa X9]0 Sal S.F A.C. under $00 tonal A.C. 7• thick) [0.00 S.P. Patch A.[. (trance) 0.55 2157fT-5p- 1.75 5.r 1• thick A.C. 0ver149 7.70 U. adjust sever .annole to gnat 750 750.00 --75U=- EA. adjust enter Clem out to graft 150.00 -�� U• "last rater'.)", to grade 75.00 U. Street lights 1000 00 L.1 11,11CAdes (interim. IS00 .In) 1.00 L.r 2 a A• redmeod header 1.75 -� S.f Removal of A.C. pavement 0.75 L.F RMVAI of P.O.C. Curb 3.30 L.F Removal of A.C. ben 1.00 [A, U. Street sign Refleclers ant posts 200.00 L.r Concrete block Ha11 75.00 MOD S.F attaining .411 20.00 IOn Aggregate base 7.00 C.T. Concrete structor.n 125.00 L.F. 16• RCP 2000 0 25.00 L.r. Li 2/• RCP 76• RCP 1500 0� 2000 a 75.00 L.F Ie• RCP 1200 D) 49.00 76.00 EA. Catch basin V • A- 9000 00 EA. EA. Catch basin N • e' 2900.00 �- U. Cato basin V m 22' Local depnsslon A' - -- 4SOO'00 EA. Local depresslm 12• Soo 00 1000'00 �- [A. 6mctlon structure 5000.00 u. Outlet str .lure. Sid 1506 1500.00 U. U. Outlet structure. Std 1507 500. ward posts Guard anal (Hood) A0.00 W L.r. 25.00 U. L.F. 11146,411 (/A• .I.q) 2.00 4000.00 Sr [.[ Red rvod header L4MU4pl�g t Irrigation Roll 2.15 _ 79 F.A. curb IP.C.C.) 750 100.00 FNGIREERII& INSPECTION FEE 17.9 O.oI SOS TOTAL 74 4. ' 60 •21MRATIOWELIREATIOS CASH - COOTINGERCT COSTS ' t6 y DEPOSIT (AEPUNORBLEI FAITHFUL PUFOINIACE 111"0 (FOP -) - F.twoT10- HORipENTATiON 544ETT (CASH) 2 10 LABOR AM MTUIAL 6080 (50%) - e7',m"r -&;rsumt to City of Rancho Cut A MunlCipal Code, Title 1, Chapter 1,00, aSSpting San etrmrdim County Code Titles, Chapters 1 -S, b Clsh restoration /dAllmttlm 4,Mtt shall be made Prim to Issuance at an Engineering Comtructlm Penit. Reviled 7/64 1?v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMP2OVEMEMT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT NO 12940 KNOW ALL MEN By THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement IS made and entered Into, In conformance with the provisf ons of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereinafter nfmi�nEi ioln Dina CIt)n,,:d TALFMAbet. ND on said qq INC. here i na er referred o as t e ere goer WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Dergloper desires to develop Certain real property in sold City as thawn an the conditionally approved subdivision enacts as Tract No 12940; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer -s prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located at Milliten Avenue and Highland Avenue NOW, THEREFORE. It is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1 The Developer hereby egress to construct at Developer's expanse all Improvements described on page 6 here- of within twelve months from the effective date hereof 2 This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this 191eesent. This agreement shall be In default an the day follow- ing the first .4. Iver•sry date of said approval unless an •xten. lion of time his been g•antad by said City at hereinafter provid. ed 0. The Developer may request an extension of time to Complete the terms hereof Such request shall be submitted to the City In writing not teas than 70 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of Circumstances necessitating the extension of time The City shall have the right to raview the provisions of this agqreement, Including the Construction standards, cost estimate, aid improvement security and to require adjustments therein 1f any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof 4 If the Developer falls or neglects to Co2P17 with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the rlq ht at any time to Cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and expense Incurred S. The Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot Of said development In accordance with the molatlons. schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Water Dlstr ict 6 The Developer shall Le responsible for 0`e111ACe2e11t. relocation. Or rnorol of any component of any frrlq atlon water system In conflict with construction of required inprov eaants to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7. Improvements required to be Constructed shall -I- 9S c sform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the Cityy and to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file In the offfca of the City Engineer. Said Improvements are tabulated on the Construction and Band Estimate, hereby Incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken from the Improvement plans listed thereon by number The Developer shall slso be responsible for construc- tion of any transitions or other Incidental work beyond the tract bounder lls as needed for safety and proper surface drainage Errors or ommisslans discovered during constructln shalt be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 8. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of wort; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention givan to safety procedures. control of quit, noise, or other nuisance to the area. and to proper notification of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the paaaltles provided therefor 9 The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all lease rocks and other debris from public rights-of-way within or adjoining said development resulting from wort relative to said development. 10. Mork done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all wort In the event of unjustified delay in comp to tlon, and to recover all cost and expense Incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means 11 Said Developer shall at all times following dedica. tion of the streets and easements In sold subldfvlslcn, up to the completion and acceptance of said work or Improvement by said Ci t,y Council. give good and adequate warning to the traveling public 0/ each and every dangerous condition etisttnt In said street or easement, and will protect the travel Ing public from such defective or dangerous conditions Until the completion of all Improvements. herein Incorporated on pe9e 6 to be Derformeq, each of said streets not accepted as improvnents shall be under the charge of said Developer aid Der eloper may close all car a portion of any street subject to 'he conditions contained to a temporary street closure permit, sffYd by the City Engineer, whenever It Is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be made. 12. parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other Improvement work, grading and cl:anup has been completed planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance In accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Cemauntty Development Director. The Developer shall be responsible for m,Intel ning all trees planted In good health until the end of the gquaranteed maintenance period, or for ane year after plantings Phl chevar if later 13. The Developer Is responsible for meatin all condi- tions established by the City pursuant to the Sub d tllslon Map Act, City Ordiances, and this agreement for the development, and for tht maintenance of all improvements constructed thereunder until the Improvement I. accepted for maintenance by the City, .2- 9� ant no Improvement security provided herainwith shall be released before such acceptance units% otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City. la This agreement shall not terminate until the malntenanco guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required Improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution ton o/ the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the Improvement security therefor has been released 1S. The inprouoment security to be furnished by the DeaalODer with this agreement shall consist of the fete +ing and shall De In a fOro acceptable by the City Attorne /I A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. 1 A bond or bonds by one or mo -a July authorized corporate sureties In the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1. t An leproveaent Security Instrument In the worm and content specified by the City Attorney. 3 A deposit with the City of money or ne9ot able bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies 6 To secure laborers and matarlalmen: 1 A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties In the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1. t An Improveaent Security Instrument In the form and content spec i fled by the City Attorney, 3 A deposit with City of money or negotiable bands of the kind approved for securing C A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Map for the s %{tinyy of all boundary, lot corner, and street ceaterlIna monuments and for furnishing centerllne tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified br the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment fn full; .i, If no value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate ccntalned herein. Said cash depotlt may be refunded as soon as proce- dure permits after receipt by the City of the Centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment in full from the engineer ar surveyor, D The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth an page 6 of this agreement 16. The Developer warrants that the Improvements descrbed in this agreement shall be free from defects In materials and workmanship. Any and all portions of the Improve- ments found to be dtfactive within one (1) year followlny the data on which the improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a sun equal to ten percent (IO$) of the construction astlmata or s100.00 which.+., Is re .ter, to secure the faithful performance of Oera�oDar•a obligaaon% as described to this para. graph The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the f althful performance b7 the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do specified wort with respect to any partway -3- IF? maintenance asfesfeent district Once the imP•OVementt have been Accepted and A malnten4nC8 guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other LprOvtment Security described in this agreement may be released provided that such release is otherwise alltharized by the Subdivision Map Act and any applicable City Ordinance P That the Developer 111111 take out and matntrin such puDllc liability and property damage Insurance at Shall protect to and Any contraCtor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, ar Anyone directly or Indirectly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Dave Peer or any Contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by sold persons The public liability and property damage Insurance shall list the City as additonal Insured and directly protect the City, Its officers, agent And employees, of well as the Developer, his contractors and his Subcontractors. old All inSeranca policies Issued thew man der shall so stare Tne alnimum amount$ of such Insurance than be as Tailors: Cantractor•s *lability Insurance providing bodily tajur7 ar death liability limits Of not less the 1700,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each Accident or occurrenca, and property damage llabil. lty limits of net less than 1100,000 for each acct. dent o• occurrence with an aggro7ete limit of 1250,080 for , AS which may arise Tram the opera. lions of the Developer In the performance of the Wort herein provided Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used 11 the performance of this agreement Providing bodily Injury liability limits of not lass than $200,000 for each person and 1700,000 for a act accident or occurrence, and property damage 11a 51111, limits of not less than 150,090 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than 1100,000 which may arise frog the opera. tiont of the Developer or his Contractor in performing the work provided for herein IS- That before the etecutlon of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a Certificate or certificates of Insurance :orering the Specified Insurance lath Such certificate shall bear an endorsement praclam ding the cancellations, or reduction in cove•Age oI any policy evidences by such certificate, Belpre I'm expiration of thirty (70) days after the City shall have received notification by reg•stered mail from the Insurance Carrier As evidence of understanding the provision, contained herein, and Of Intent t0 COmply with %Aml, the S.bdtvtdsr has submitted the fall OVtn9 described Improvement stcu•Ity. and has affixed his Signature hereto: .A. 0 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: SB0,500.00 Name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: $41,700.00 Mama and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUNENTATION Type: Principal Amount: 53,100.00 Name and address of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Typal Principal Amount: Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the partial hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acanowlHged with all 1`0rma11t,as required D, law on the dates set forth opposite their signatures Data , r.j�p by `°f �1, Developer gna y`r'a me Data By ,Developer qna ure • qy a4..Y 91 } 1 r . � Accepted: rs,aa A City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation By: May:r Attest: y er Approved: DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED 99 -5- EngEst CITY OF RAACIIO CUC PPONOA MINEERING DIVISION EMDROMIC RT PERMIT FEE SCMEOIAE For Iprovement: Street Oats• Donau r: File Re erenci e: IV lZ O City Oraying L, Dick NOTE: Ones rot Include current In Tor vriting permit Or pavement deposits - QOANTITf UNIT ITEM PRICE A14OUKT L.F P.C.0 cure - !2. O.F 24• gutter 7.25 TyHT6_- L.F P.C.C. curb - 8• C.F 24• gutter 6,00 E0.909.C/I L.f vX, curD Only 5.50 _ L.F A.C. berm 4,50 7i3T SJ 4• P.C.C. sld¢walt 1.75 3 SJ Drive approach 2.80 S.F 8• P.C.0 cross gutter (Ix. Curb) 3.40 _ C.Y Street ecuvatlon 1.50 L.T !ported embarkment I.so J S.F Preparation of subynde 0 IS 5.103.60 S.F Crusned agg. be-., (per Inch thick) 0.03 4,121.84 TOY A.C. Over 1300 tons) 27.00 1101 A.C. 900 to 1700 tonal 35.00 T03 A.C. 500 to 900 ton) 45.00 TON A.C. wl0er 500 tons) 60.00 =0? S.F. A.C. J• thick) 0.55 19.B V.60 SJ Patch A.C. (trench) 1,15 SJ I• thick A.C. overlay 0.30 EA. Adjust sear manhole to grade 250.00 EA. Adjust sever clam Out to grade 150.00 EA, Adjust eater valves to grade 75.00 8 EA. Street lights 1000.00 jl L.F. Barricades (intersec. $500 min) 1.00 , -- L.F 2 A A• red.000 header 1.75 S.F. Removal of A.C. Pavement 0.35 _ L.f Remevat of P.C.C. curb 3.30 LF Reanv41 of A.C. Der• 1.00 T EA. Street signs 200.00 �OSE�• EA. Reflectors and posts JS.00 _ L.F. Concrete Dint nil 25.00 _ _ 5.P Retaining vali 20.00 TON Aggregate beat 7.00 C.T. Concrete structures 425.00 L.F l8• RCP 1000 P 29.00 _ _ L.F 24• RCp 1500 0 35.00 L.F 36• RCP 2000 DJ 49.00 L.F 48• PCP 1200 D) 16.00 EA. Caen b81n Y • 1' 2000.00 -_ EA. Catch bnln g • 8• 2900.00 _ EA. Catch basin N • 2T 4500 10 -- EA. Local depression 4• 500,00 EA. Local depression 12` 1000.00 EA. JActl" structure 5000.00 _ EA. Outlet structure, Std f506 1500.00 -- EA. Outlet structure, std 0507 500,00 EA. G,-AN posts 40.00 L.F. Guard panel (van) 25.00 L.F Smut 2.00 EA. Mea(ch,Jil I:8• King) 4000.00 _ L.F Redvood header 1.75 -�- �- S.F Landscaping 4 Irrl9Atlon 2.75 L.F Roll curb PP.C.C.I 7.50 42 EA Street Trees 100.00 4,200.00 ENSIREERING I4SPICI101 FEE S 3,887 50 SUB TOTAL S 75,896.49 •RESTORIITION/MELINEATION CALMS T. CON7I88ENCY COSTS i"56335� DEPOSIT (REFLNMOABLE) FAIT OUL PERFO KANCE BC- (10011S NONWEM $ 7,300.00 ATION SURETY (CASMj LABOM: AND MATERIAL BONG (SDS) S 41.703.0�- ePunuant to City Of Rancho CuCardngA MWhlCIPAI Code, Title I, Chapter 1.08, adDpttng San BernArdlro County CO, TItleS, Chapters 1.5, a casA restaratlon/delineation deposit sMll be made prior to Issuance Or N Engineering Cnttruttlan Permit. h` Revised 3/84 /d 0 CITY OF RANCHO COCANDMGA INpRDYEMENT ASREENERT FOR TRACT NO. 12911 KNOW ALL MEN ST THESE PRESEVS: That this aqreement is made and entered into, In Conformance With the proaielons of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and a HO eaaAD aE SdRWFPw GI I{b9YIR_ INC. herai na er re erre try a$ e Ifeve opt WITkxSSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop cartain real property Im sold City as shown on the conditionally approved tuedlvl.1.a known .Trott No 12911; and WHEREAS said City has established certain requirements to be at by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located it Milliken Avenue and Highland Street NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as follows: 1 The Developer hereby agrees to Construct at Developer's expense all Improvements described on page 6 here• of within twelve months from the effective data hereof 2 This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Oou.til of said City approving this •gram me. I. This agreement shall be in default on the day follos. I. tae first anniversary date of said approval ucless an eaten- SIC of time has been grentH by told City at harelnafter provid. ed I The Developer may badumet on extension of time to complete the tarsi hereof Such request shall be submitted to the City In writing not Iett than 70 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of Circumstances necessttating the extension of tine. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, Including the Cpn$tructron standards, cost estimate, and improve. ant security, and to require adlustnents therein 1f any substantial change has occurred during the term hereof / If the Developer falls or neglects to Comply with the provisions of tats a reennt, the City shall have the rlyyht at any time to cause sa d provisions to be met by any lab ul means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his st•ety the full cost and Cape.$@ incurred 5 The Oa• eloper shall provide metered meter service to eacn lot of said development in accordance with tha t•qMotions, n schedules, and fs of the Cucamonga County Water 01st lc rt 6 The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any irrlg:n G. Water system In conflict with Construction of required Improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. Improvements required to be Constructed shall •I. /O/ centers to the Standard Orawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement plan approved by and on file In the afrlce of the City Engincar. Said improvements are tabulated on the Construction and Band Estimate. he.eby incorporated an gaga 6 hereof, as taken fro] the improvement plans listed thereon by number The Developer in t 11 also be responsible for construc- tion of any transitions or other incidental wort beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or ommisfions discovered during const-uctin shall be corrected upon the direction of t.,e City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the Surety covering the original planned works 6 Construction ;*rafts shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed lhureom shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, it other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities and City DeDartemets Failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor j The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to said development 10. York done within existing streets shall be diligently pirsued to comple Stan; the City shall here the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay In completion, and to recover all -ost and expense Incurred from the Dare toper aid /or his contractor by any lawful means 11 Said Developer shall at all times following dedlCa- slan of the streets and easements in said subldivision. up to the completion and acceptance of Said work or improvement by said City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling Public of each and every dangerous condition existent In said street or casement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions Until the completion of all lnprorements, herein Incorporated on page 6 , to be performed, soon of said streets not accepted as Improvements shall be under the charge of said Davaloose Sat: per •loper may close all or a Do rt tan of any street subject to the COndit1041 nontalned In a temporary street closure Permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the Public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made. 12 parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other improvement wart, grading and cleanup has been coast Its Planting shall be done of provided by Ordinance in cc.rda.ce with the planting diagram approved by the City COmmunity Develepeent Director The Developer Shall be responsible for maintaining all trees plarted in 909j health until the end of the 7uaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting. rh C a or Is later 17. The Developer is responsible for meeting all coati. Slams established by the City our ... at to the Subdivision Kip Act, City Ordiances, and this agreement for the development, and th for the maintenance of ill Improvements Constructed ereunder until the Improvement Is accepted for maintenance by the City, -2- "J6e2. and no Improvement security provided hereinrith shall be released before such acceptance unless Otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City la This agrtement shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been role aed by the City* or until a new agreement together with the required improvement security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein mated, and by resolution of the City COUMC41 same hat been accepted. and this agreement and the Improvement security therefor has been released IS. The improvement security to be furnished by the Dever Opel with this agreement shall Consl3t of the following and shall be In a fore acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement I A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate Sureties In the form and Content specified by Government Code Section 66199.1 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and Content specified by the City Attorney. y. A deposit with the :ity of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved foe Securing deposits of public monies B. To Secure laborers and uterialmen: t A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized Col crate sureties In the form and content speLlfled by Government Code Section 66499.1 2, An Improvement Security Instrument In the form and content Specified by the City Attorney. 2 A deposit with City of money or nogotlable A Cash deposit with the City to quirantee payment by the Developer to inn engineer or surveyor •hate certificate appears upon the Final Nap for the enttlmq Of all b2Vndary. lot corner, and street centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City The amount of the deposit MAY bd any ]mount Certified by the engineer or surveyor ere acceptable payment In full; or. If no Value Is submitted, the Cash bond shalt be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein. Said Cash deposit may ha refunded a3 soon as prod. lure permits :file receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment In full from the engineer or surveyor D The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement. 16. The Developer warrants that the improvements descr !bed In this agreement shall be free from defects in materials and woramamShlp. Any and all portions of the Improve. •ants found t0 ea defective within ens (t) year following the data on which the Improvements are accepted by the City ,hail be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The DelmiopOr Shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security in a Sue equal t0 ten percent (10%) Of the Construction est IdAte or $200 00, whichever IS gqreatsr, to secure the faithful Performance of Developer's obligation% IS described in this pars. IThe maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the faithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the nave toper to do Specified work with respect to any partway .S. /0 3 cae0todm and sa mmaintenance r guarantoo securityr has teen ° teen accepted by the City. the other improvement security described In this am therlt td by ° thereleased Subdivision dMapt Act sand any saPPItCable Otherwise City OrdlntnCe 17. That the 0avelOPer shall take out and ",It prtar otect such Dub11C liability and property damage insurance as %I' Ate and any contractor or sua can trector erlarNeq work covered by this agreement frog cls", for Pro o or ty dam@ 03 which MAY arise because of the nature Of the wort or from operat on% ^:der this 1, greament, whether Such OPOratlen3 Da by ALSeIf re my employed DY alaleu Per30n S, Avon mthe'.ea SUCH Idt:tgas ba not Indirectly bi obtontr6 AIi0rmean YO no ee PioY ade'J es a id r persons The contractor Public I UDItit and Prop or ty ♦d a actlyl Protect tnt 11 C it �tIts the offi/cirL addltonat Inc urad and his contra .11 nsur agents and aaDlor•a, at well as tM nsura ce And h0 nd eunt:r SAalI At, mfo ftc a, The inbumm Amounts of Policies iuch Insu Nnq !:all be as !0110"3: insurance providing bodily c rr °it injury o death lae lieylimts f not lass th f700,000 /0r e]ch parson and $1,000,000 for 40th aceldent or occurrence. and property damage llabil- 1tY 141tf of not less than 5100,000 / . each etc l• dent or aofurrente with an aggron limit Of M loni0 of fur claims Orv0la0erfmIn toy performancee of ethe wart %train Provided all 0 vehicles used Iln ttthe performance oaf this r agreement provldtng bodily 1001Y liability limits of not each thin accident $200,000 far Or Occur" eperson ad Drop and 000 for age I11bilitY Itrits of not less than 550,000 for each tCeldent or occurrence, with an a9 ragate of not lets than $100,000 which eaY +rite 7roe the Op•a- tlons of the Developer ar his Contractor In Derforeisg the work prurid ad for Wet .,. 18 that before the a4CUtlan of this agreement, the 0ap leper shall file .,in the Clty a certiflCaV Or cart Kicrtes of certificate shaltrfngair Specified ndorsement am precluding such the cancellations. or reduction In coverage o•' any policy arldeeays by much prt lflNH before the ftDlNtlon Of to ey ,q1 days after the City &mail hire received not fIC+HOn Oy regif teed mall from the Insurance carrier. And of intent Ceto /comply swtth[finthe tprovisions e i�ea . -der teas a Submitted the following described lopravaq nt security, and hat affised hit signa:ure hrrctot -1- ioV FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Mount: $76,500.00 Mast and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: 578,250.00 Name and address of surety: •5• O.0 CASH DEPOSIT MONUMEBTATIOR Type: Principal Amount: S 2,650.00 Rase and address of surety: RAIITENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amounts Rase and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTAMCE BT THE CITY In WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused t •10 presents to he duly executed and Actnovlodged with .11 formalities regolrtd by 1a. on the dates sat forth opposite their signatures. _ //Jf �e Data i.�.-7/JJ,)' by /L..�./.! �if'�s .Developer qna e COWL F Nf `,Alto Data by ,Developer qna ure Printed p4 µ1n D!Y:aoa ralr �ru ACCy Dted: y�{YmaaW J City of Rancho Cucamonga. F..i Caltfoa ewaw,.. tiw ~ A Municipal Corporation By: Mayor Attest: city Clerk Approved DEVELOPER'$ SIGNATURE RUST BE NOTARIZED •5• O.0 EngEst City OF RAWKI CUCAXINGA ENGINEERING DITISION ENCROAC)IMENT PERMIT FEE SCREIXLE For twovment: Street Data: opute y: File a erence: 19 11941 City Drarinq NOTE: Does not Include current In Tor Kitten Perwlt on Pmaent deposits CRIVITITT 017 ITEM PRICE AlOW L.F P.C.C. cure - 12• C.F 24• gutter 7.25 L.F P.C.C. curb - 6. C.F 24• gutter 6.00 .100.00 L.F P.C.C. cure only 5.50 L.F A.C. ben 4.50 S.F a• P, C.C. sideralk 1.7S �qd,L $.F Mire approach 2.50 _ S.F 6• P.C.C. cross gutter (Inc. cure) 7 aD _ C T Street escalation I. SO C.T Iegorted aobankwent 1.50 JT97� SJ Preparation of ubgrade 0.15 9J� SJ Crushed egg, ease Ipa• Inch thick) 0.05 ,i,19 -i .14 TOY A.C. over 1700 tons) 27.00 T0.4 A.C. 900 to 1330 tons) 75.80 TOM A.0 SCO to 900 tons) a5.ro TON A.C. under 500 tons) 60.00 SJ A.C. (T thick) 0.55 I9:IOE78�' S.F. Patch A.C. (trench) L7S S.F 1• thick A.C. overlay 0.70 EA. Adjust sever Manhole to grade 250.00 EA. Adjust serer clean Out to grade 150.00 EA. Adjust !star valves to grade 75.00 5 EA. Street lights 1000.00 'S611SD✓f L.F 6e"Icades (Interest. $SOO stn) 1.00 Us 2 a a• rednod header 1.75 S.F seasonal of A.C. pneatot 0.35 L.F Rmoval Of P.C.C. curb 3.30 L.F Rm vsl of A.C. ben 1.00 I EA. Street signs 200.00 U. Riflrtors and posts 35.00 -- L.F Concrete block all 25.00 S.F Retailing All 20.00 TOM Aggregate base 7.00 r T Concrete stnctures 425.00 L.F Ill- RCP (2000 D) 29.00 L.F 24• ACP Di) 35.00 L.F ((1500 36. REP 2000 D 49.00 L.F a6• RCP (1200 0) 76.00 �- EA. Catch basin N • a- 2000.001 G. Cato Basin N • 6' 2900.00 EA. Cato bast. N e 22' 4500.00 EA. Local d:,1resslon A- $00,00 EA. Local depression 12. IODO.00 EA. Junction structure SOOO.ro EA. Outlet structure, Std 05% 1500,00 EA. Outlet structure, Std 0507 500,00 EA. Guard posts 40.30 LF Ward panel (w d) 25.00 L.F Smut EA. Need all (48• ring) 4000.30 L.F Red.00d header 1.75 S.F Landscapistyy . Irrigation 2.75 L.F Roil cure IP.C.C.I 7.50 32 EA Street Trees 100.00 3,200.00 ENGINEERING INSPECTICH FEE 5 3,567 $0 SUB TOTAL 1 69.496.07 •RESTCRATI04 /DELICEATION CASIIS 1.000.00 COIITINGENCT COSTS DEPOSIT IREFUN0.ULE) FAITHFUL PEAFOVLAMCE BUD (IOD%JsT- 51b'�7- NOAIFIENTATIOA AATETT (CASH) S 2,650.00 LABOR ARD MATERIAL BOND (50%) S Try-0 TW aPorfumt to City cT Ranoo Cuue10n94 lknICIPAI Code. Tltle 1. Chapter 1.08, adopting San Bernardino County Coda Titles. Chapters 1-S, a Cash nstoratlon /dellnaatlon depmit tall be wade prior to istuance of an Engineering Construction p"It. Aavitod 3/64 /OC s CITY OF MANCMO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT NO. 12912 KNOW ALL MEN BY THiSE PRESENTS: That this agreement is side and entered Into. In conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucasonyye, California, a municipal torpor At Ion, by and between sold Cl Y, hereinafter referred to a the City, and Raafsen and broad hereinafter referred to as the OaHOpor. WITNESSETM: THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real propert lr' In said City as shown on he conditionally approved subdivision Rnovn as Tract No 12912, and WHEREAS, said City has established Certain requirements to be set by told Developer as prerequlslte to approval of said subdivision generally located at Milliken and Highland Avenues. NOW, THEREFORE, It Is hereby agreed by said City and by slid Developer a follows: 1 The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer's expense all Improvements described on Psgo 6 here- of within twelve months from the effective date hereof 2 this agroomm", shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement Thts agreement shall be In default on the day follow. ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an exten. tion of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provld. ad. j. The Developer may request an $,tendon of time to complete the terms hereof Such ra4u6st shall be submitted to the City In writing not less than 30 days before the expiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement of circumstances necessitating the extension of time The City shall hive the right to review the provisions of this agreement, including the construction standards, cost estimate, and improvement fecuritY, and to require adjustments therein if any substantial change ha occurred during the tare hereof a. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City shall have the rigqht at any time to cause tad provisions to be at by any ,am mans, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or his surety the full cost and espense Incurred S The Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot of said development In accordance with the re7ulatlons, schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Water Dl strict 6 The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any Irrigation water system in conflict with construction of required Improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 1 Improvements required to be constructed aa•1 conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specification& o.' the City, and to the Improvement Plan approved by and on file In .1. �m 16 i i the office of the City Engineer Said Improvements are tabulated on the Censt r yet l an and Bond Estimate, barley Incorporated on p +9e 6 hereof, as taken from the Improvement plans lifted thereon by numbar The Developer Shall 6310 be 1110dnslb L. far tonstruC- tlOn Of any transitions Or other Incidental Mork beyond the tract boundaries as needed for Safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or ammlSSIOn1 discovered during constructin shall be Corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer, Revised work die to Said plan modifications Shall be covered by the provisions o' this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 6 Construction permits shalt be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of wort; ell regulation• listed thmreun shall be observed, with Actin tiara Alvan to safety procedures, control of dust, nolf e. ar of Mr nuiSince to the area• and to proper notifies tl on of public utilities and City Departments Failure to comply with this Section Shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. 9 The Developer shall be raaVonslele for removal of all loose ;acts and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjoining sold development resulting from work relative to said development 10. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to temple t Ian; the City Shall have the right to complete any and 611 work in the @rant of unjustified delay in completiOn, and to recover all coat and expense incurred from the Developer and /Or his contractor by any lawful means. 11 Said Developer shall at all times following dedica- tion of the streets and easements In Said subldirlslon. up to tie completion and acceptance Of laid work or improvement by said Cit) COanCtl. 9114 good and adtq-1- warn ng to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition exls tent In sai4 street or @element, and will protect the traveling public Ira. such defective or dangerous conditions. Until the COOpl.tton of all Improvements. herein Incorporated on page 6 . to be yerforaed, each a said /treat/ net accepted se Iepro ves.. is Shell be under the Charge Of said Developer Said Developer way close all ar a par Stan of any Street subject to the Conditions contained In a temporary Street closure permit. Issued by the City Engineer• whenever It is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be wade 12. parkway trees required to be planted Shall be planted b• the Developer alter other leprovaent work, grading and cleanup has been completed pllntlng shall be done as proof ded by Ordinance In eceorda +Ce with tin olanting diagram approved by the City Community aev@Icement Olrettar The Developer Shit be responsible for .aintalning all trees planted In good 1lalth until the and of the yysea nnteed maintenance period. Or for one year after planting, vj uarant ed later Is Il The D @VOIOper IS responsible for meeting all condi- tions established by the City pursuant to the tubdtvislon flap Act. City Ordiances, and this agreement Poe the development, and for the maintenance of all improvements Comtructed thereunder until the ImprO1te.nt IS accepted for maintenance by the City, and no improvement securlt) provided hereinwith small ba released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided exd authorized %0 Y -2- by the City Council of the City. 14. This agreement shall not terminate until the ■al nten am ce guarantee security hereinafter described has been raiused by the City, or until a new agreement together with the red Aired Improvement security has been submitted to the City by a swc:ulor to the herein nab N. and by resolution of the City Council same has bum accepted. And this agreement and the Improvement security therefor has been released 13 The Improvement security to be furnished by the Oerdaper with this Agreau rat shall consist of the following ane shall Oa 11. a form acceptable by the City Attorneys To secure faithful performance of this agreement 1. A bond or bonds by one or sore duly authorlied corporate sureties In the fore and content specified OF covernmen. Code Section 66499.1. i An Improvement Security Instrument In the fore and content specified by the city Attorney. O A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bones of the tend approved for securing deposits o/ public mantas To secure laborers and materlalean: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in tha fore and content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1 2. An improvement Security Instrument In the form and content Specified by the City Astor may 0. 4 deposit with City of money or negiatable .ands of the kind approved ror securl ig A cash deposit with the City to guarantee ptlmant by the Developer to the engineer nr surveyor whose certificate appears upon the final Mir for the setting of ail boundary, lot corner, and strut center lne monuments and for furnishing centerllnn tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in fulls or. If no value 1$ submitted, the Cash bond shall be as sl)wn on the Construction and Bond Cstimate contained herein Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as proce- dure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie motet and written alsorance of payment In full free the engineer or surveyor the required bona$ and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement. 16 The Developer warranty that the Isprorements described to this agreement shall be free from defects in mater Nis and workeanihin Any and all portions of tie Impruvq- Sents found to be defective within one (1) year fol low inV the data on which the Improvements are accepted by the City shalt be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a malntenince guarantee Security In a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the eanstructlon estimate or 3200.00, vhicher er It yyrester, to secure the faithful performance of Developer s obligations as described In this pare. IThe maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the f sett hf ul pe-form4nce b the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do spiel /led Park .ith respect to any parkway maintenance assessment district Once the Improvements nave been accepted and a maintenance guarantee Security has been accepted 109 -S- �8�. by the City, the other Improvement security described In this agreement may be released provided that Such release Is otherwise autherlted by the Sobdlvlslon Map acs and any applicable City Ordinance 17. That the Developer shall take out and maintain such Public liability and property dtmage Insurance as shell protect his and any contractor or subcontractor performing hork covered by this agreement from ela ma for property damages which may arise b,cause of the nature of the wort or from Operations under this agreement, •bother such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor. or anyone directly Or Ind rettIy employed by sold persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons The public llabllit) and property d.n.9. insurance shall list the City as add Ronal Insured and directly protect the City. Its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer. hU contractors and als subcontractors, and ell Insurance policies Issued hereunder shall so state The minimum amounts of such Insurance shall be as follows: Contractors liability Insurance provldln bodes injury or death liability limits of not lest the $300,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and pr3lertr) damege llabll. ity limits of It leas enema $ 100.000 for each acci. dent 0r occurrence with in aggregate limit of 5250,000 for cielme which may arise from the opera. tlont of the 0evelope' In the performance of the work herein provided Automobile liability Insurance covering all vehicles used to the performance of this agreement providing bodily injury liability limits of not less than 1200.000 for seta person and $300,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not mss than $50,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not test than $100,000 which may arise /roe the opera - ttonS of the Developer or his Contractor In Performing the work provided for herein. is That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a Certlflcato or certificates of insurance COverin the specified Insurance Each such cartiflcata Shall Dear an endorsement precluding the Cancellations, or reduction In coverage of any policy evidences tY such certificate, before the expiration of thirty (30) days after the City shall have received notification by registered mail Iris the Insurance carrier As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and Of Intent to comply with same, the Subdivider his Submitted the fallowing described {Oprcvement Security, and has affixed his signature hereto: //,0 11 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: 594,000.00 • Have and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: 147,007.00 • Name and address of surety: ' CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION • Type Principal Amount: 1 3,300.00 Rue and address of surety MAINTENANCE GUARARTEE ' Type: Principal Amount: Nana and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY •� IN WITNESS HEREOF. the Partial heretO here caused thou I resents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all t ornalltlt$ rsquired 61 law an the date$ set forth opposite their t 3n4tures Oat@ A+ - rN 0p3'by Oerslooer 1 qna ure I /JrINAI_� f- �!N F, 14, yyt .. ~ eE_� Ct9 Date _ by .D•.elo er p rn e ro r} gnu ure f Pr Tn 5 i Accepted I ttty of Rancho Cucamonga. Coltfornla i A Municipal Corporation S By: Mayor Attest Y er f S Approved: DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIIED .S. CITY OF RMCIIO CUC/MOwA Vy S.J. "C.) ENOIREIRIIG 01VISIOR ESTIMATE OF COST iRAGTI IM/CR DATE 7/9/65 (Rte. 9 /14 /AS) TRACT 17742 UILMOPCA �RAy'7,'DRO,IIr�� COCA ION f tMill uu I u EMNEfR / llut GF"7DfR0WEE __�'IlNT1TT UNIT IT(r Pa ICE MOUNT 5 t.F P.C.C. cure - 8• C.F 246 Cater 7.25 2.08X.00 _7.66? L.F. P.C.C. curb . 6• C.F 24• gutter 6.00 O.ISt.ro .. L.P. P.C.C. curb only S.sO --- _- L.F .i A.C. herd a• P.C.C. sldMale 4.50 1.75 �1 �p.YJU -nL S.F Drive approach 2,50 S.F B• P.C.C. cross gutter (Inc. curb) 7.40 C.T Street alcavatlon 1.50 prepared of 1.50 z S.F S.F on subg Crush d,lon of sub pee C•usned A9g. bate raper Inca Nlck)(1') 0.15 0.07 TOM TON A.C. beer tons) 27,00 __ A.C. 900 to 1700 tans) 13 75,00 �- ION TON A.0. (500 to 900 tons) 15.00 TOR A.C. (under SW tons) 60 00 `9.911 5.F A.C. 7.55 5 46' - .F Patch A.C. (trench) 1.75 S.F 1• Ntck A.E. C. overlay 0.70 FA. AJJust sever sannole to grade 2s0.00 FA. Adjust serer clean out to grade 150.00 - -- -_?- EA. Adjust eater valves to grade 75.00 EA. Street llgnts 1000.00 T.T urT, LF Barricades Itntersec. 5500 stn) 1.00 .TOT' L.F 2 A A• redwood Mader I.7S S.F. Reruwal of A.C. paeesent 0.75 L.F Amoral of P.C.C. cure 7.70 L.r RMVI. o• A.0 bera 1.00 _a EA. Street signv 200,00 - b0010'i' _ FA. Reflectc $ Ind posts 75.00 L.F C ¢rote black "all 28.00 S.F. Reuling valt 10 Co TON Aggrtgate base 7,00 C.1 C-dcrete structures 42S.00 L.i 16 RCP (2000 O 29.00 _ _.. L.F 2a• RCP (150.1 0 75.00 L.F. 76• RCP (2000 O 49.00 -_ LF 48• RCP (1200 0 76.,d (A. Catch basin 4 . a• 2000.00 -.. EA. Catch ba-tn Y • 81 2907.00 - -- (A. Catch brstn V . 22' 4500.00 _2 FA. Local depression 4• 500.00 FA. Local dyresawn 1, IOW.W FA. Junction strut lure 5000 00 __ EA. Outlet structure, Std #506 IS00.00 EA. Outlet Structure, Std OS07 $00.00 �- EA. Gard posts t0.00 L.F GNAfd panel (vcodJ 25.00 L.F SAVCUt 2.00 EA. HUNAI1 (46• ving) 4000.00 L.F 110.0ed header 1 75 -� S.F LNdsclpin, L Irrtg]tibr 2.75 - -- �- L.r Roll curb ( C.C.) r.,,8p 57 EA etreet Trres 1pp;00 - -- 5.700.00 65 l.f Transition ;ere 5 Gutty (8' -6') 6.00 790.00 EMGIR(FATIG INSPECTION r(C 1.155 SOB TOTAL 'RESTORATI0.y /OFL NFATION CASH 85 oat 49 Oee051T (NET-,-,, law COMEINGERCT COSTS IONIA FNTAiIOR FAITHFUL PERFC4UKf BOND (10 0%) -g7iuW'Oif' Su'RETT (CASe) 7.lOJ LABOR AND MATERIAL ROAD (502) t Ir •Mrsuant to City of Rancho Cucaem9a MmlclPal Code, Title 1, Ctuptn I.OR, krwdfm Titles. Adopting San be toyissuanceo Enginneerirg Cmtt,,,,tim pmlt/ lliwAtiob dagosft shall Revised 3/R4 Fn CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 10. 12941 SHOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this ayrevment Is wide and entered Into, In conformance with the pravtslCPS of the Subdiv On Map Act of the Se at or Califormis, and or the applicable Ord l Nantes of tie Cl ty of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal l PC rn U, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, herelraltar referred to at the City, and Marlborough Development Corporation hereinafter referred to as the Developer WITNESSETH: T MAT, WHEREAS sold Developer de Rims to develop certain real pro party in said hty as shown on the conditionally approved Subdlvl•.1aA known as Tract No 12947; And WHEREAS, said City hat established cartel` requirements to be at by said Developer as prerequisite to opprOval of said subdivision genev all y le:ated at Milliken and Highland Avenues NOW, THERE EORE, It is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as /pilots: t In, Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developer'I. ton%* all improvoenis described on page 6 here- of within 41pe months from the affacI've date hereof 2 This agreement shall be effective An the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this ,green ens. This agreement shalt be in default In the illy follow - +Ag the first anniversary date of sai ad d approval unless an exten- sion of time hev been granted by fatd City as hereinafter provid. O. The Developer may request an extension of time to complete t u he ses hereof Such request shall be subultrod to the City n wrist not less than SO days before the capiration date hereof, and Shall contain t statement of circumstances necessitating the eft ens ton of time. The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement, Including the cdnstru ction standards, cost altima e. and Improvement security. and to require AdJultment, therein If any Substantill change has occurred during the tare hereof 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to CC -Ply with the prohh .ni of this agreement, the City Shall have the riqht at any It to cause said provisions to be met by any lawful means, tAO :hereupon recover Prom the OeralODar and /or hlf surely the full colt and expense Incurred, S. The Developer shall Provide metered water sorvice to each lot of said development In accordance web, the raqulations, fchedul 'S, and fees of the Cucamonra County Water District 6 The Oevetsper Shall be responsible for replacement. relocation, or removal Of any Component of any Irrigation water systyn In conflict with construction Of required Improvements to s the a If action of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7 Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Dre.fft2I and Standard Specificitions of the City. and to the Improvement Plan sppro+ed by and on rile In -I- ,f/.3 the office of the City Engineer, Said Improvements are tabulated an the Construction and Bone litigate. hereby Incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken fro leprovement glans lifted thereon y number The Developer shall also be reloonsltle for construC- tio" of any tranfitla., cr other Incidental wort beyond the tract boundaries a needed for safety and proper 2trface drainage Error& or o.wlffions discovered during constructive shall be corraited upo, the dlrectioa of the City Engineer. Revised wort due to said plan modifications shall be coverts by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering OR original planned works 6 Construction permits Shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to Start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with alt asat loo given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise. or other nuisance to the area. and to proper ratification 0f tubl.c utlltttn City Departments Failure to cculy with this section shaland l De subject to the penalties provided therefor. g. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose racks and a -her dOrls from public rights -of -way within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to sold development 10. York done within existing streets shall be dillgwntly pursued to cowpletian; the City snail have the right to complete any and all work In the event of unjustified delay In completion, and to recover all cost and expense Incurred from the Developer and/or his contractor by any lawful means 11 Said Developer shall at all times fallowing dedica- tion of the streets and easements In said cubldlvislan, up to the completion and •cc•ptArce of said work or improvement by said City Counc I, give goad and adequate warning to tns traveling DuD 1c of each and every dangerous condition eaistent In said strut or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions Until the completion N all Improvements, herein Incorporated on page 6 to be performed. each of said streets not accepted ea inDroveaante (hall be ands, the Charge of said Developer Ltd Developer may close all or a por Lion Of any street Subject to the conditions Contained In a teeoarary street closure permit. Issued by the City Engineer, whenever It is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be made 12 Parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other Improvement wart- grading and cleanup has been cobuloted Planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance In accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community Development Director The Developer small be responsible for matntalning all trees Planted In Rood health until the end of the 9uarinteed maintenance period, or or one year after planting, whichever Is later 17. Tht Developer is responsible for meeting all canal. slims established oy the City pursuant to the Subdivision Pap Act. City O,dlances, and this agraement for the development. and for the a Intenante of all improvement, Constructed thereunder until the Improvement it acrtptpd for maintenance by the City, and no Improvement tecurltl provided hareluwith Shall be released before such .captance unlasi otherwise provided and authorized .2. NY by the City Council of the Cis, le This agree., st shall not terminate units the maintenance guarantee sec- sty hereinafter described has been relu3ad by the City, or Jtil a new agreement together wl :h the required Improvement see- Ity has been submitted to the City by A successor to the hares named, and by resolution of the City Council seat has ben accepted, and this agreement ails the Improvement sfaurlty q refor has been released. 15. 1., IS, ovement security to be furnished by the Developer with this a re% ant shall consist of the followirg and shall be In a form as 1ptab a by the City Attorney: A. To $scut fal:hful performance of this agrmcstnt 1 A Dal o bonds by one or mare duly authcrlted corps Ott sureties In the fora and ccnttnt fpecif d by Gurernaent Code Stetson 66199.1 I An Improvement Security Instrument In the fare a•d content specified by the City Attorney 3. A deposit with the City of money ur negotiable bonds at the kind approved for securing deposits of public noales B. To secure laborers and materlalmen: 1 A bond ar bonds by one or man duly authorized corporate sureties to the fore an. rontent specified by Government Code Section 66e9Y 1 2 An loprovn.nt Security instrument In the fore and content specified by the City Attorney 3 A deposit with City of money .r negotiable bands of the kind appeared for securing C A cash aaposlt with the sty to gta,gntee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose Certificate appears Joan the final map for the settenyy of all boundary lot toner, and strut centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, It no va tub Is Submitted, the mesh bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained here'.n Said cash deposit may be refunded as soon as prose• dure permits after receipt by the City of the crdte•llne tie notes and written assurance of pays it - full from the engineer or surveyor 0. The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth an ra3. 6 of this agreement 16. The Developer warrants this the Improvements date bed In this agreement shall be free from do,c'tt In asattrlals and workmanship. Any and all portlons of the lmpro,4 sent, found to be defective within one (3) year following the data on which the improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of 01 charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance gsarentee security In a sum equal to ten percent (10t) of the construction estimate or $200 00, whichever Is greater, to secure the faithful Performance of Developer's obliges ens as described In this Date. MphMph The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the ul Performance 0Y the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do so Stifled work with respect to any partway maintenance assessment district Once the Improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted 3. f1s.- iris by the City, the other improvement security described in th:S agreeBnt may be released wrovlded that Such release Is uthervlle autborlted by the Subdivision slap Act and any applicable City Ordinance. 17 That the Developer Shalt take out and maintain Wuh public liability and property damage Insurance as Shall vOtert him a,1 any cc-tractor Or subcontractor performing work cavernd by th s agreement f,as claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from c"rations under thlf 'greuent, whethar such operatic,% be by himself or by any cantr.ctor or Subcontractor. or anyone directly car Inllrectly employed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Do vel over or any coitractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons The public Is* bI l l tY and property damege Insurance Sbc11 list the City 45 addlton al I au red and directly protect the City. Its officers. agents and employees, is wail as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insnrance solicits issued hereunder shall so state The minimum amounts of such Insurance shell be as follows: Contractor's liability Insurance V0vldiny bodily injury or death liability limits of not IS%$ the 3300,000 for each person and S1,000.000 for each accident or 0ccurren u, and property damage liabll- Ity limits of not leas than 5100,000 for each acci- dent or occurrence with an aCpprevate limit of $250,000 for ctalas which may or so /ram the opera. tions of the Developer In the performance of the rock herein pro, fed Automobile liability insurance co er ing all vehicles used • the performance of this agreement pro, ding bodi y injury liability limit not lets them $200,000 for each parson and $300,004 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $50,000 for each accident at occurrence. with in aggregate of not less than $100,100 which say afite /ram the opera- tions of the Developer or hit Contractor in performing the wart provided for herein is That before the executlan of this agreement, the Oevetooer shall file with the ^lty a Certificate Or certificates of insu•ance car eri tht specified tisurance Each such cart lflcate (halt Dear an fntlprtam ant precluding the cancellatlonso or reduction 14 coverage of any policy evidences by such certtfteste, btfora the expiration of thirty (30) days afte- the City Shall have received notification by registered malt fran the Insurance carrier, As evidence of undarstandlag the pr0vislons Contalned herein, and of Intent to Comply with save, the Subdivider het submitted the following described Improvement security. and has affixed his signature hereto: //rb FAITHFUL PERFOCNANCE Type: Principal Ampunt: SS ^•.000 00 Mme and address of SuratYl RATERIAL ANO LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: S 51,500.00 Name and Addrrl: of surety: CASH DEPOSIT HONUMENTATION Typal Principal Amount: $ 7,550.00 Name and address of surety: NAICIENAECE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: Marne and address of surety: TO RE POSTLO PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE RT THE CITY IN HII%ESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these Presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all form Alitfes required by law on the dates tot forth Opposite their signatures ��� `/ t /�,J✓�NEIIT_CORPOASTidI Date (l(1[SS— "'����tur�S, n care .gweloper Pau M. R s ylte President ,`,' �/./ r �nt�es Date U4Ivs� Ui�l.— .Developer qna can Doleres H. 0'e rlen, secretary Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Call /urn la A Hunlcir Corporation Ry: , mayor Attest y •r Approved: DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST RE NOTARIZED -S- 9= Inisr- // - d^CITi Or RATCIU C'JC/M 1.11A 1, '' •v EIILIMAM Ot TIS10A li ESIIMAIE OF COST TRACEIpM M Tract 12943 PATE 7 -7 -AS IOGTIOd •'ni ten /nion a OI f1101'IR wl eormron oee. oro. fALhIEIA i -r--r m reasan, oc OIUAITrf ORII MIT PRTC[ anenr =. L.r L.F P.C.C. curb . 12• c.r 71• guitar 1.2s L.f P.C.C. curb - C• C.f 24• grtler P.C,C 6.00 •T2;ISSGT -3537- L.f curb only A.C. berm 5.50 S.F S.F 01 F.C.C. slde.tlt Or lve 4.50 I.73 S.F F.C.C. Groh R• .C. (rett gutter (Inc, curb) 2 s0 3.40 C.T Street euagllon ),S0 _ Prepared mbof 1.50 S.F 5 f SJ vreparri ten er su race sy 0.15 7TJ1-07 T00 [ruched 697. bauhim, Inch thldll 0.03 --� 100 A.C. are, 1300 lens) A.C. 21.00 700 900 to 1300 torts) A.C. 00 Ie 900 loot) 13- 35.00 Ton A.C. oneer 500 tent) 49.00 60.00 3.1. A.C. lAlc /) Patch A.C. (trenchI O.SS ZS;T2T� S.F. [A. I• thick A.C. e.erlq 1.15 0,20 G• Adjust seer MoNele 10 grade AdJust 250.00 Se.e.• clean cut to grade Adlusl vat" Valves le 2SO. C0 uG. grade ll 15.00 F fares des lnlnuc. SSW min) low OD ;fir •L L.r. 2 r 4• red.eod Rtadrr 1.15 S.F. L.r Reaev,l e/ A.C. pav<emt Re+m,l n/ P.0.[. (orb 0.35 �� fllr• Rm ,al of A.C. berm 3.30 1.00 Street , �- G. Reflectors and Dallt 230.00 n00.00 wall 35.00 S.F. Retaining wall 25.00 on Aggregate bate 20'00 C.1 L,f Concrete ltruplmet 7'00 423.00 L.F. III RW 2000 0 24• REP 1100 01 29.00 35• RCP 2000 0 33.00 L.r 4b• RCP 1200 0 49.00 -� G. Catch basin R . /' 76.00 G• filch basin R.0' t1�'00 �. G. Catch basin R . 22• 2M'00 [A. Taal depresslon a- 4500.70 [A, G. Local depression li' 100'00 1000'00 [A. Junction structure all<t tlruclurr, Sld 1506 5000.00 G• [A. Collet structure, Std ISO/ 1500.00 500.00 L.r. Ward pot is Ward Panel (mood) 40.00 L.r sancut 25.00 G. t.r Meao.all (ad- YIn9) Red.eod header 4 2.00 000.00 S.F tandscspin L Irrigation L75 L.F. G. Roll curb P.C.C.) street rakes i./5 7.50 100.00 FAOIAEGTI INSPECTION fC[ 4.99r.00 019 TOTAL 9i •0.25TCSIITf(REFUNDAGTIOn CASH TSaO�OT --' CMtlllrrGCT COSTS DEPOSIT (R[f0A0A61F) FAIMIUL PERFORMAICE 6010 ((003) .h IR1M1'/ERTATIOn SIOIETT lCA5M1 T 55,7.00 LA60R AND IUTERIAL 60.10 (503) ".W.00 _ e toeatsm9i SPaI lRCMarlm d Pier 1.adpg Sm j o .0 SI, rsemrtm/de lmdott be aside Prim to ItSuance of an Engineering Construction permit. Revised 3/94 //S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TRACTS 12612, 12935, 12936. 12932, 12938, 12939, 12910, 12911, 12912, 12913 AND 12911 LANDSCAPE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: The' - .s agqreemant Is Made and entered Into, In confo -Nance with the proms Ions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a Municipal corporation, by and between said City. hereinafter referred to as the City, and GUfyM AM0 00.G0 OE P. .1.4101 CALIFORNIA. IbC. her* ni er rw erro [o as e Der. poaT WITNESSETH: THAT, WHEREAS, laid Developer desires to develop certain real property In said City as shown on the conditionally approved subdivision known as ; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be amt by sold Developer as prerequisite to approval of said subdivision generally located at Milliken sienue and Htghland Avenue ROW, THEREFORE, It Is hereby agreed by said C 'y and by said Developer as foi' -„s: I The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Oevelor -,'s aapinse pal Improvements described on Page 6 here. Of within twelve Months from the effective date hereof 2 This agreement %halt br effective on the data of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be In default on the day follow. ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an eaten. Sion of time has been granted by said City a$ hereinafter Provid. ed 3 The Developer may request an extension of time to complete the terms hereof. Such request shall be submitted to the City In writing not lets than 30 days before the expiration deta hereof, and shell contain a statemen• of clrcumstrnces necessitating the aattnfian of time. The City shall have the right to rev`ew the provisions of this agreement, Including the construction standards, cost *atlM.t.. and Improvement security and to require adjustments therein If any substantial change his occurred during the term hereof a If the Deve,00er fall, or neglects to comply with the provisions of this aqreement, the City Shall have the rlp0ht at any time to cause sa ld ororlslons to be met by any lowlul meant, and thereupon recover from the Developer and /or hit surety the full Cost and eipenee Incurred 5 The Developer shill provide metered water service to each lot of said development In accordance with the reyulatlons. schedules, and feet of the Cucamonga County Mater Oistr itt 6 the Developer shall be respontlble far replacement. relocation, or removal of any 10611 -ant of ant irrigation water system In conflict with construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of tuch venter system. -I- /IF 2, Improvement$ acquired t0 be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to ina Improverent Plan approved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer Said tap,ovements are tabulate• on the Construction Ind Bend Estimate, hereby Incorporated on page 6 hereof, as taken fro. the Improvement plans Isted thereon by number The Developer Shall also be responsible for Construe. Lion of any transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract boundaries at needed for safety I'd Proper surfa,e drainage Errors or omelsslpns discovered curing Comstructln shall be Correctea upon the direction of the City Engineer Revised work due to said plan modifications Shall be Covered by the provisions Of this agreement and secured by the surety Cc %ring the original planned vorks 6. Construction permits shall be obtalnel by the Developer from the office of the City Eng4dar prier to S -Irt of work, all regulations listed Sharman Shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or Other nuisance to the area, ant to proper notification mf public utilities and fits Departments Failure to comply with this section anal! be a, jeCt t0 the Ptmilties Provided therefor 9. The Developer shall be responsible for re +oral of ail loose rocks and other daorls from public rigntf -af -way within or adjoining laid development retulting from work relative to said development to gdrk done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to Comp Httan; the City `hell ,.ere the right to complete any and all work In the event Of unjustified delay In completion and to recover all cost and expense Incurred fro, the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means tt Lid Develope- shall It all [lees following dedic4- Si0n of the Streets and easements in Said subidivision, up to the cemplmtion one acceptance of aid work 01 Improvement by Said City Council give good and aCequate warning to the traveling public Of each and every dangerous candit•on exlsttnt In Said Street or easement, and .111 prctect the traveling pvhilc from such defective ar dangerous conditions Until tee cuePletloe of all Improvements, herein incorporated on Page 6 , to be performed. each of said streets not accepted as IMP Oee.ents shall be under the Charge of Said Developer Sold Developer may close 111 0, a portion of any street Subject t0 the 00061•I0nS contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to crotect the pub is durleq the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made 12 Parkway trees required to be planted shall be Planted by the Developer after other Impfovement volt, grading I'd cleanup has been con Plated Planting shall be done As provided by Ordinance In accordance with the planttng dlacram approved by t1e City COmmumlty Darelppnent DlreCtpr The Devalocser shall be IOSPOnsible to, malntalming cal trees planted In good iealth until the end of lhn guaranteed nalntOnamce Collate or for one year after planting, whichever IS later 1. The Oevelooer IS reswbmN ble for meeting all condl- items established by the City purluent to the Subdivislen Nap Act, City Ordlan.es, and this agreement for the development, ant for the maintenance of all improvtments constructed thereunder .2 /K0 until the improvement Is accepted for maintenance by the City, and no Improvement security provided heralnvlth Shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City 11 This agrtement shall not terminate unt it the maln.enance guarantee security herelnefter described has even released by the City, or until a maw agreement together with the reguirad improvement Security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council tmee has been accepted, and this agreement and the improvement se:urlty therefor has been released is The lmproreme mat security to be furnished by the Developer with thlt agreement shall consist of the following and shall Oe In a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To Secure faithful pnrfarmenre Of this agreement I A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties In the form and contest specified by Government Code Section 66199 1 2 An Improvement Security Instrument In the form and content specified by the City Attorney 7 A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies 6 To secure laborers and mat ,lolmon: I A band or :ends by one or more duly autharited corporate curettes in the form and content specified by Government Cade Section 66199.1 2 An Improvement Security Instrument In the fors and content specified by the City Attorney. 0 A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the lisp approved far securing C A cash deposit w1th the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon -.a Final Nap to- the Sotlln of off boundary lot corner, and street centerline Soma um arts and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full; or, If no value Is submitted, the cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and band Est "Ate contained he'll, Said cash deposit ^ay be refunded AS soon as Peace- Curt permits aft,, receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment in full frbr the engineer or surveyor D The repuired bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement 16 'he Developer warrants that the improvements described Im this agreement %hall be free from defects In material% and workmanship Any and all martian% of the Improve- ments Pound to be defective within one (1) year Sol lowing the data on which the Improvement% are accepted by the City (hall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security In a Sul eVual to ten percent (10%) of the construction estimate or 1200 00 whichever Is greater, t0 Secure the faithful pe-f armance of 0ere(acar s obligations AS described In this para- MphMph. The maintenance guarantee security Shall also secure the . performance by the Leveloper of any obligation of the %.12/ Developer to do specified work with respect to any parkway maintenance assessment district Once the lecrpvaeents have haen accepted and a maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other Improvement security described In in's agreement may be released provided that such release Is otherwise author'aed by the Subdivision Nap Act and any applicable City Ordinance 17 That the Developer shall take out and maintain SW public liability and Property damage Insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or cull :ontracter peeforaing work covered by this agreement 'roe claims for property damages which say arise because Of the nature of the work Or from operations finder this agreement, another such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subeo,- tractor, or anyone directly or Indirectly test Oyed by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor ar subcentra ctar or anyone employed by said persons The Paul is l,abtlity and property dosage Insurance shall Ilst the City as addltonal Insured and d,ractly protect the City, Its officers, agents and eeplcyees, as +oil as the Developer. his car,ractorf and his sub.ontrtctors, and all insurance policies Issued hereunder Shall so state The minimum anouits of such Insurance shell be is folio+% Contractor's liability rotor. -Ce providing bodily injury or death its billty limit, of not less the S300,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accldent or occurrence, and prop. t do.ace Itsbil Ity limits of hat lest than $100,000 for each acci. dent or occurrence with sn aggregate halt of S250.000 for c 1 lens which may trite from the Opera - items of the Devalue,, 1, the rerfornance of the work herelm provided Automobile liability insurance covering all vehicles used In the performance of this agreement i asst than $200,00a fir tacliability .nd $100,000 for each accident or occurrence and property damage liability limits of not less than S50,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not Its, than $100,000 which may arise from tb+ opera- tions of the Developer or hit Contractor in performing the work provided for hereto 18. That before the execution of this agreement, the Devaloter shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering in, &Pacified Insuranci Each such certlf cite shall bear an endorsement Precluding the cancel ations, or reduc eon In coverage of any Policy evidences by such certificate, before Ve expiration of thirty (00( days after the City sh 11 have iecolved notlflution by registered mall from the Insurance carrier As evldenra of understanding the provisions contained hartln, and of Intent to comply w'th same, thi Subdivider has suemitted the following described leyrovehent security, and has affixed his signature hereto: a- /.? A FAITHFJL PERFORMANCE Type: Pr nn PAl Amount: $822,000.00 Hall And address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal AmOUnt $411,000 00 Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT HONUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: M/A Mau and address of surety: M1IINTERANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount N/A Nlee And address of surety TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BT THE CITY IN HITNBSS HEREOF, the parties hereto lave Caused these presents to ba duly efecuted and KlnoRled9ed alth all /Orgllt 44 re0ulrwd by lie an the dates Set f0r'h apposite their S 9natures Date ;I Aar by .. /.....11 F,G, ,Developer qna urr _�K /.M 1Y r �lrti..tS CORPORATE AC NOWT CWAAVMT SIPa01 Ll11fe M1! tanrye' 1q1 A^_RLS1__ 4=gl��& a. 1 a wf nr S$D. a.T Or Umber RBL blmew _ Leslie Starr Roblllard mr wr Jq Haabh Dafawnr appeard RIChIld F. Rohlflro, of Mctor Of told bereloprvnt I bnanan vw.nm mw wo.K ro •wan mr eru a ar uuarK rom rrof I¢r ID b IN brrMU ab UKtlq IM �nrw rfMrnrA p an blwl r a nr ao'oannpn uwrrw nMr1 WKf/tlnYO9MmM W1LM t6yMIP r.KNrOn DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE 40TA812ED .S. ia3 • C, Iry OF gAMM CUCAMONGA EMIKEERIAG DIVISION E1 00wmprr PERMIT FEE SENED14E For leprorlxtet Date: Tracts 12612 ��— 10.7.85 129 5 [nn, 179:0 —� City Drarin ROR: Does net Inc,ude current fee for "'Elting perlilt or parreent deposits _QOAMfTr 'UNIT —� —��- A. NAROSGPE [Y PRICE A4DUYVT 54.000 164 S.F StEtNa It L.i Stem 3.5( 189.00O.W 8. LVIDSCAPE 15.0 2.460,00 169,610 S F S'F Sol' Prep d tine Grade 271,3N l7d S.f, iurl Nydrofete) DIOY'1d lover 9 I7. O.f •12 •r5 48,132.00 IJ.1 J8.00 Free! S.i AMU1' Color 0 46.165.00 A id EA. 48. 60, 1 0 136.00 EA. [A. 36. 6o, •Gal' 975.)o 1.436 15 on 700.30 8' DD'00 7.000.00 SnruSs 65 00 93.340.00 6.726 124 EA. 5vslton EA. I Gino, lc 00 88.560,00 7.112 l.i Snorel Ctt Nwder S DO 66M.00 tu+p Sw L.S. Irr19atrcn '0 1.721.00 Cupp S. L.S 60 pay 4 ... tena +a 235.000.00 16,004.00 ENGINI[RING INSPECTION FIE 37 487.04 •RESTORATION /DEL I NEAT TO'1 CASH �'' SJ9 r TAC DEPOSIT iREFU4CAgLE) _iuRS�T— CONTIISENCy COSTS S746 760 YOMIMNTATIOY SURETY (CASH) eq 'At- IL PERFORMANCE BOYD (100{) •°•, w'I Wa0 LABDR AVE MATERIAL BOND (50t)� be revursoant to City of Rancho Cucaoon9u Munlcf041 C de. Title 1, Cn1Dte'E 1.08, adoPtInq S. ide pr Camel issuance ce t ifs, CEq,neo 1.5 be rcstarat ion /delirrcat ion deposit snail prior to Issuance o1 an F^91Mer1 +ertsed 3184 wtion pmft, ,/.7 y n d try 1% h Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT MAJOR STREETS FOR TRACT NOS 12642, 12935.41 KNOW ALL HER By THESE PIESENTS That this term .Want 1s ' Made and entered into, +- cunfdrmance with the provisions of the Subdivision 'lap Act of the State of CCllforn H, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. a municipal Carpolatlon, 1 and between laid Clty, p". hereinafter referred to as the City, a d tA11 RtLt AMO gAOAD OF G G SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. INC. her Inaigr rmr errea [o as t a eve opar. C LITRES ETH: THAT, WHEACAS, sell Oerela Per e.slres to develop cartel. real property In said City as shown an the Condit lone!!. approved S ubd+v+sion tnown as Tract Has 12602,12935 -Cat and WHEREAS, said City has established Certain requirements to be met by sH d Dtwo OPO^ n Drerequlslt, to approval of said .uDelrl$to' .,.-:rally lolcat:d at Milliken and Highland Avenues NOW THEREFORE, it Is hereby agreed by said City and by told Developer as follows: I The 00.01" r hereby agrees to construct at Oarat00ar'a aspens. III ImprovA @,it described on Page 6 here. of wl -hl. !webs months from the eff:cTils data hereof 2 This agreement shall be affective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement This agreement $hall be In default an the day follow. 1n9 the I rat anniversary date of said approval unless an as San- at " of Slat has been Srented by said City of hereinafter provid- ed 3 The Developer may request an extension of time to Complete the t.rms hereof Such request shall be submitted to the City in Writing not less than 30 days before the aspiration date hereof, and shall contain a statement Of Circumstances necesslt sting the ettersion of time I" City shall have the right to review the provisions of this ag ueafnt, Including the CpnatructiOn standards, cost estimate, and Improvement seeurlty, ' and to require adjustments therein 11 any SYbitantlal Chang. has occurred during the term hereof. a. If the Developer falls or neglects to Comply with the Provisions Of this I do.e -t, the City shall have the rigyht at any time to Cause said provision, to be met by any IawfY1 means. and thereupon recover from the Developer and /Or his surety the Iuli t cost and expanse Incurred t 5 The Developer shall provide metered water service to each lot of Said dvelcpment in accordance With the reyyulatlOni, schedules, and lees of the Cucamonga Courty Water Ol trl ct relocation, or' removal Developer loo elater any Daneresponsible o/ lane irrigation system +n Conflict with construction of required improvements to the :ti SfkctiOn of lit City IIginear and the owner of such water %,at<. i7 Im Prorements required to be constructed shall -1• r conform to the Standard Cravings and Standard Spec lficatlons of the Cltr, and to the Improvement plan 1001o1ed by and on file In the office of the City Engineer Said Improvements are tabulated on the - onstruction and Bond Estimate, hereby Incorporated on page 6 erOOf, as taken from the Improvement plans III ad thereon by number The Oeve10021 shall also be responsible for canstruc- tlon Of any transitions Or ath,r Incidental Work belold the tract boundaries at needed for safety and proper surface drainage Errors ar OmUssions discovered Suring cnnstructin shall be Sarre. ted upon in, direction of the City Engineer Revised Walk due tc said Plaa e,liflcatlees shall be covered by the provisions of th s agreement and Secured by the surety covaring the original plann110 works B Construction permits shall be Obtained by the Developer tram the office of the City Engineer prior to start of Work; ail regulations listed thereon shall be Observed, with attend On given to safety Procedures, control of dust, no, se, a- Other nuisance to the area. and to Proper notification of Peblic utilitlea and City Departments Failure to Comply with this Section Shall be Subject to the penalties provided tier dor 9 The Developer shall be responsible far rtzo,al of all 10016 rocks and other debris from public rlgh11 -Of ray within Or adj0lninq sold development resulting from Work relative to $ate development 10 Mork done wl•hin aalsting streets Shall be dlliSently pursued to completeo•; the City shall have the right to ccmplete any and all work In the Great of unjeStiffed delay In C Cap i Sion, and to recover all cast and exoense incurred from the Dore oper and /Or bit contractor by any lawful means 11 Said Developer shall at all times following dedica- tion of the streets and easements in sold subldirlsion, up to the Camp etica and acceptance of said Work or Ivpror ement by said Cltr Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling Pub it of each and nary dangerous eon0 itloe eaiipnt In said stn at or easement, and Will protect the traveling publla trop such dtfettlq or dangerous conditions Until the tomplatian of all 1- •.-elements, herein Incorporated On Page 5 , to be Preformed, elth of said streets not accepted as Improvements shall be under he charge of said Developer Said Developer may Close all art: pirtlon of any street subject to the Conditions contained in a tespo,ary street Closure permlt, Issued by the City Cny Ilea,, whenever It Is necessary to Protect the Publ C during the construction of the leyroveeents herein agreed to b roads. 12 parkway trees ,egulred to be Planted shall be o anted by the Developer after other Improvement work, grading and Iesoup hat been completed Planting shall be done as Provided by Ordinance in accordance with in planting d,tgram approved by the City Community Development Director The Developer shall he responsible for maintaining alt trees planted In good heal th unt I the end of the guaranteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting. Whlchavar is later ly The Developer Is responsible far veating all COndl- tlonf established by the City pursuant to the Subdlrlsian Rap Act. City Ordiances tad this agreement for the development, and for the maintenance of all Improvements Constructed thereunder rntll the Improvement Is accepted for maintenance by the City, /Q and no Improvement securtt provided herelnwl!h shall be released before such acceptance on sea otherwise , *riled and authorized by the City Council of the City. 14 This ,grease -t shall not terminate until the maintenance guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required 1- pvoveoent security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council same has been accepted, and this agreement and the Improvement security theref`r has been released IS The Improvement security to be furnlshed by the geveloper with this agreement shall conolst of the following and a hat` to In a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A To asters faithful eerforsance of this agreement I A bond or Donis by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties in the form and centsnt specified by Government Coda Section 66499 1 2 An 1,;rovement Secure y Instrument In the fore and content specified by the City Attorney. 9 A deCOs It .tin the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies B. To secure Ishe r a rs and mate,laleen 1 A b`cd or bonds by one sr mare duly authorltsd corporate sureties n the form Lad contort specified by Government Code Section 6649) 1. 2 An Improvement Security Instrument In the form and content specified by toe City Attorney. D A deposit with City of Honey Or negotiable bonds of the kind approved f1r securing C A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor %hate certificate appears upon ate final flap or the sett InQ Of all boundary, lot coder, and street canceling monuments and for furnishing centerlino tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified Drr the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment In full: or, If no value Is submitted, the cash bond shall be n shown on the Construction and Bosd Estimate contained herein. Said cash deooslt may be refunded as sap+ as orace- .ure permits after recatpt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of payment to full from the engineer or surseyor. 0 the required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are se: forth on page 6 of this agreement 16 The Developer earrants that the impra eemente described to this agr -event ,hall be free from defects In materials and workmanship Any and all porno -3 of the Improve. ments found to be defective wteh,n one (1) year following the data on which the loproviments are accepted by the City shall be rep al red or replaced by Oavelo;er free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee taco; it 1n a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the construction so mat. 0, $200.00, vhlchever is greater, to secure the 4ithCut performance of Oeveloptr•s obligations at described In this para. MphMph. The maintenance guarantee security Shall 9120 secure the . performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Developer to do specified work with respect to any parkway .1. A9 maintenance .ISOISwent dltt•Ict Once the Impresements have been acct 0ted and a Malntenan a guarantee security Hs bee, accepted by the Clis. the other Improvement security dtscrlbe4 In this agreement say be released provided that such rele to Is otherwise auttorited by the :ubdi, Iflon Map Act and any tpplic3cia City Ord lnance II That the Oeieloper shall take out and malntaln such public Ilablllty and prap'rty damage Insurance as thall protect him and amy contractor or Sltcantractor performing wart core red by this agreement from c alms for property damages which may gel $e because of the later• of the nark or from ape, It Ions under this agreement, whether s,-h operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcavtracto , or anyone directly or Inuirectly employed by said persons, lien though such damages be net Caused by the negligence of the Deret *per Or any can rector or subcontractor or anyone entlayed by said persons The public liabilit and property dangle insurance shall flit t•et City as addltona� Insured and diretily protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as wtl' as the Developer. his c ntractors and his subcontractors, ant 411 Insurance poilNts Issued hereunder shall so state The minimum amounts of such Insurance shall be as follows: Cantractor't llallllty Insurance proeldlnv bodily Injury or death lability limits of not less the 3700,000 for each person and $1,000.000 for ea— accident cr accurr•nce, and pr *Party damage llabll- Ity limits of not less then 310O.ODb for each acci- dent ar occurrent, with a aggregate limit of $250,000 for claims which may &rise from the opera - tlons of the Develooer in the performance of the wore herein provided Automobile llabll'ty Insurance covert.g all vehicles used In the performance of this r,reement % %,kilns bodily Injery liability limits of not ate than 3200,000 for each person and $100.000 for each accident or occu•rence, and propert) damage liability limits of not less than $50,000 for each accident or occurrence, with in aggregate of not lass than $100,000 Well may arise from the opera - tlaps of the Developer or his Contractor in performing the work provided far herein 10 That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of tnf uranct covering the specified Insurance Ctell such cartlf l Cate shall bur an endorsement precluding the cancellations. or reduction In coverage of any volley evidences by such certificate, before the expiration of thirty (10) days after the City chill have received notification by -agistered mall from the Insurance carrier. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained '•erein, and Of Intent to Comply with tame, the Subdivider has su•,mltted the fallowing described Improvement Security, Cad has tffixed his signuure hereto: /m? % FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: $2.075.000.00 Mama and add, B! of Surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount: SI.058,000.00 Name and address or surety CASH DEPOSIT MONUMEATATION Type: Principal Amount: NA Name and address of surety: M?IRTEAAMCE GUARANTEE Type; Principal Amount: NA Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PATCH TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF. the parties hereto have caused there presents to be duly e.ecuted and acknowledged With formalities required By law or the dates set forth opposite t, signatures Date I1•11•6f by ,Developer gnasure V., an ed nets by •Developer gnature wed �" , "•: up 4tt Accepted: •u...� =� +�4 City of Rancho Cucamonga. California A Municipal Corporation By: Mayor Attest: City 'r Approved: DEYELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED -5. ia9 laer� CITT OF R"ClIO CUCANXICA Page 1 of 2 ENGINEERING OIVISIOI ENCRGACIDENT PEIL4IT Fee SCHEDULE For Igrorencnt: Xlliiken Ban an NII1rie. to. • Terrace Tler Butler Dark Data: SNIT 7fEl� oaqutea o;: a _ ar�aan nc. ilia Re ereaca: ra_.1 n:1. City Draalnp TOTE: Does not Include current in for rriting permit or pavement deposits _QUANTITY MIT I1E9 PRICE AMIT 1 935 .F D.C.C. cur! - 12• C.D 21• gaiter 7.25 11 O10.00 "y-!`03r -T.W' L F P.0.C. taro • B• 0.i 21. getter 6.Ct) L.F P.0 C cure only 5.50 525 t•F. A.C. corm 3.50 �ilRrs $.F 1• D.C.C. old "sit 1.75 S.1 Drive approacN 2.50 i S.F 8• D.C.C. [roes gutter (Inc. curb) 1.10 �3T4S:36 C.T Straat cacavatlon 1.50 - C.T Iegorial mb,tvent Lso 721"SL� 421A288 SP Preparation of suDyyrde 0 i -;t -196 0 -Sryi'22 _td�7Er S.F FOR Crush a99• case IDer Inch Wck) A.C. 0.07 -A YR1 T65O5 Im TTR aver 1300 tons) A.C. 900 to 1300 tons) 21.00 35.00 TTR A.C. 900 to 900 tone) 35.00 = FOR A.C. ender son tons) 60.00 S.F A.C. 1• thicl 0.55 S.s Patch A.C. (tren zr) 1.75 S.F I• Thick A.C. overlay 0670 EA Ada,st saw- manhole t. grade 250.00 EA Adjust swer clean cut to grade IS0.D0 -� F.A. Adjust rater valve'. to arade 73.00 �53� -86- EA. Street lights 1000.00 -gr8rvj L.F Barricades (Intersec. $-DO min) 500.00 - Tid�dO L.F 2 a /• repnod "odor L75 - 7i2llri� S.F BMW of A.C. pavement 0.35 L.F Rmmral of P.C.C.:urb 3. ]0 L.F Resod of A.C. berm 1.00 -�- FA. Street signs 200.00 i795um -T sA� Reflectors and posts 31.00 �O�J L.. Concrete clock rail 25.00„ _ 5.1 i.- reining all 20 00 _ TO1 Aggregate ou. 7.00 - C.y. Concrete stnctur is 12•.00 �i --06- L.F 18• RCP (2000 D7 2'I.u2 L.F 23• RCP 0 )5.00 T'653�5 y_ L.F 36• RCP 2000 Di 89.00 Z2`77Tdj LF (((1500 as- RCP 1200 D) '6.00 ZS�SO�J i_ EA. Catch burn N • 3• 2030.00 - 2'i.�J.'DD -i- -� EA. Catch basin N • 0' 2500.00 IN EA. Catch begin N . 28' Y00.C] �T EA. Local d1p•esslon J' 700.00 EA. Local doresslov • 12' I700.00 EA. Junction structure •0• 000.00 isar>saa EA. Outlet structure. Std #506 SSO0.00 �C EA. Outlet stricture, Std 1507 900.0006 EA. Guard posts 10.00 Li Guard peed (vnod) 25.00 t F Samut 2.00 EA. ""All (18• ring) 1[100.00 _ l.i Redrood header 1.71 9.F Landscapingq f. irrigatlon 2675 L.F Roll curb 1P.C.0 ) 7.50 -�- ENGINEERING INSPICTIM FEE SUB TOTAL 1.C55.S21 •RESTOPATI0.N 1DELINEATION CAS4 CONTINGENCY COSTS DVOSIT (REFILIDABLE) FAITHFUL PERFOUVIU'E BOND (NODS) HDIDUENTATION SWETT (CASH) LABOR AND INTERIA BGNO (SOS) aPMVut to City of Ra -as Cuciaomila flmicipal Bemudim County Code Titles, Chapter 1 -5, a be Glade prior to Issuance ofil LEngineering Con adoptleq San depesit shall CITY OF RANCHO OICAM= page 2 of 2 E%GtMEERIMG DIYISIM EKCRM00EMT FERMI FEE SCHEat.E For top" nt: Milliken gm an Millrl hr I.P. villa a Itnl:e Tie. Bull,, art Ditr. S/ 2/g 9qu[ta q: a erne. Im.r Flit a am. race ms. $S:7 CIty Orlring MOTE: Dyes not Include cun>rt fn for Writing permit or paresent deposits OISL'RI IT LIMIT ITEM PRICE AMORIT 90 L.F 10' ACP 15.00 4 050.00 T148 L.F 12• RCP 61.00 �Er L.F 60' 0.7 80.00 - r L.F 65' RC! 100.00 -_ 7 33'=WW0 00 -C - 3'2UA- L.F 72' RCP 110.00 L.F 6' Chain Lent Falco 5.00 - ID-Zw.m 5SS00 EA. Double 6' Chain lint Gm 150.00 -TMOM EA. Drain w7• 2,00' T EA. Seem Stand Orate Manhole •A• 2 2 370.00 0a WOO �00 T EA. storm Drain Manhole '8• 70`1 00 - �q-q;0�'- S.F 2 Ton Rip-A&0 (.0o 9300.0E -f9�BUU.w - IE'736- X057- S.f o (A Bard) 111 Tan Rip-Rao 118' D<ep) 3.00 L.F Cone. flap Channel 207 00 70' L.F Earth Prop Channel 10.00 1A.0�c0� F L.F 6. - .ri• Moles) 72. 00 (, 9r. 110.110 �S`OQSOG �- EA. ) A.C. 72• CM' UU ga.) A. Gipped 125.01 �- EA. Debris nut soD.a - i- EA. Cone Moaar BI- 1000.00 �ta�0`E0 4 066.30 - IeL.S. S.F A Access Road - 7• A C./90% Camp. Soil 0.55 B D00 00 L.S. L.S. Stript'? 5000.00 �i EA. Structure 1000.00 -9'0 1-03 OOOV �- EA. Cut -off Cut -oft Well 1000.00 - 1'OSS(A EA. Concrete Collor 1500.00 LA. ]unction Come, 1500.00 �'TiIIS.d'f( EA. Come, CUMnai Trans] C 250.00 X758-05 4oadeq flan Y -57, 1.71 -31 100.00 '160.00 - L F L.F 1. 1.00 - �- L.F Perk 6' Par /anted Pepe 10.00 �- EA. CIO Riser Struct. 2500.00 Z366:a5 �- EA. Concrete Collar $00.00 - i'.0WON - -73zlzr- --WW L.T ACMtltat Wall (6'• high) 25.00 172 500.00 L.F Acoustic /Retaining tail 55.00 ,J OWN l.F Retaining Block Wall (7'. High) 70.00 ENGINEERING IRPECTIOS FEE 87.655 SIX TOTAL 'RESTOLIIION /DELIMEAftOM Case �- COT irmosCT mTS Clan) DEPOSIT (NEFOIOCLE! rminrm PcRFOR.WACE 9050 (EOOS) MONVENTATI0/ SURETY (CASH` M/A WOR AMO MATERIAL BOND (504) ePursuat to City of Renal Cut Municipal Cuts. Title 1, Chat" 1.08. adopting San Beroardim County Code Titles, Chapter I -S, a Cash rs7torulaNdel lasatlan deposit shall to mode Prior to issuance of am Emglahering Ccattractlae Permit. Revised 1/81 /3/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT INTERCEPTOR LEVEE AND CHANNEL FOR TRACT NOS 12642, 12975 -44 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this ayreement Is made and entered Into, In COIlformanCe with the provisions of the Subdivision Cap Act of the State Of California, and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal Corporation, by and between said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and RAUM4 AND AP.OAD Of F.EAA R. gLITORRIA, INC. _her elna or referred o at e hire oDer WITHESSETH: THAT. WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property In said City as shown on the conditionally approved subdivision known at Tract No 12642, 1290S -44; and WHEREAS. said City has established certain requirements to bit met uy tali Developer as prerequisite to approval of Said subdivision generally located at Milliken and Highland Avenues NOW, THEREFORE, it Is hereby agreed by said City and by Sell Developer as fellows: I The Developer hereby agrees to construct at On Doper's expense all improvement I sac rlbad on page 6 hen - of within twelve months lrom the effective date hereof 2 This agreement shall be effective on the date of the ref01 Lion of the Council nv said City approving this agreement This agreement shall be In default on the day follow. Ing the first anniversary date of sold approval unions an extrn. lion of time his bean granted by said City as hereinafter provid. ed 7 The Developer may request an utvtlon of time to Complain the terms hereof Such request shall be submitted to the C' y In w -itlog not less than SO days before the aspiration data hereof, and shall contain a statement Of circumstances necessitating the extension of time The City shell have the nigh: .o review the provisions of this agreement, Including the :onstruc HOn standards. cost estimate, and Improvement security. and to require adjustments therein If any substantial change hes mccurre4 during the term hereof 4. IF the Developer falls or neglects to cggly with the pro t"Slots of this a roreent, the City shall have the right at Ili Came to cause said provisions to be mgt by any lawful means, and thereupon recover from the Developer anVar his surety the full cost and !.range Incurred S. The Developer shall provide smeared water wrv4cQ to each lot Of said development In accordanra with the regulations, schedules. and fees Of the Cucamonga County Water Diste Ict 6 The Developer Shall be respons ble for replacement, ralocat l0n. Or removal Of any component Of any Irrigation water system IA COAL let with construction Of required Improvements to 6 a Htisfactitn of the City Enginter and the owner of such water .yltio. taproreoents required to he constructed shalt -I. l 3.A conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement plan approved by and on file in the office of the City Engineer. Said Improvements are tabulated on the Construction any Bond Estimate, hereby Incorporated on page 6 hereof, is taken from the Improves tnc plans listed thereon by number The Developer snap also be responsible for construc- clon o1 any transitions or other Incidental murk beyond the tract boundarlea as needed for safety, and proper surface drainage Error% or oubsions discovered during constructin shall be Corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due to aid plan modlficatlons shill be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured Ur+d by the surety carerin9 the original planned worts 6. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer fro% the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, dith attention given to safety procedures, control of disc, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to proper notification of public utilities section shall d be i subjects to them penaltfmsr provided the this therefor. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights- of -wSY within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to sold Jevtlopmen[ 10. Work done within existing streets snail be diligmpantlY pursura to completion- the Citv shall here the right to colete ae, rnd all work in tie event of unjustified delay In COepie[10 n, a.d LV recover all COs[ and expense 'ncurred from the DCvelOpef and �Or hi coney actor by any lawful seanT 11 Said Developer shall at all times following dedlCa- Stan of the Streets and bas Manta in said subldivislons up to the completion and acceptance of said work or improvement by said City Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling public Of each and every dangerous condition existent in •old %treat or easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous condltlons Until the completion of all irprovements, herein incorporated on page 6 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted ea feprsiw we shall be under the charge of said Developer. Said Dsv*IOpef may close all o- a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a temporary street closure permit, issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the improvements herein agreed to be made 12 parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after otter improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance In accordance with the planting diagram approved by the City Community gevNOpeent Dirac as The Developer shall be responsible for maintaluing S11 trees planted 1n good health ur[Il the end of Ih. gu arantced maintaeance period, Or for sins year after planting, wh chtwer is later 11. The Developer IT responsible for gelid all condi- tions established by the City pursuant to the Sib lvision nap Act. City OrdianCes. and this agreement for the development. and for the maintenance of all Improvements constructed thereunder until the IsprOvemant Is accepted for maintenance by the City, 51! l33 and no Improvement security Provided herainwlth shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and autharized by the Clty Council of the City. 14 this agreement shall not terminate until the maintenance 9uarantee security hereinafter described has been role 4a by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required imprpv ..At security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named. Ina by resolution of the City Council same has Iles" accepted, and this agreement and the improvement security therefor has been released IS The Improve.@At security to be furnished by the Developer Wth this agreement shall consist of the /allowing and shall ba In a Iva acceptable by the City Attorny: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreement. I A bond or bonds by one or more duty authorized corporate sureties In the form and content specified by Government Code 3ectipn 66199.1 2 An Ieprpvenent Security Instrument In the form and coetont Specified Ly the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with the City of money or negotiable I nos of the kind approved for securing deposits a! public monies. 6 To secure laborers and materlalmen: I A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties In the form and content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1. 2 An IOprovement Security Instrument In the fore and content spec I' by the City Attorney. 3. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bands of the kind approved for securing C A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose cart 1710 ate appears upon the Fin a Map -or the sett In � of all boundary, lot corner. and street canter Ina monunenas an for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City The mount of the deposit may be any aeaunt certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payment in full: or. If no value is submitted, the cash bond shall be as Shawn on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein. Said Cash deposit may be refunded as soon as peace; due* permits after receipt by the City of the centerline tie notes and written assurance of Payment In full from the engineer or surveyor 0 The required bonds and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement 16. The Developer warrants that the Improvements descr l bed In this agreement shall be free from defects In materials and wQrkatnshlp Any and all portions of the Improve- ments feu ad to be defective within one (1) year following the data an which the Improvements are accepted by the City shall be repaired Or replaced by Developer free of all Charges to the City The Developer shall furnlsh a maintenance guarantee security In a sue equal to ten percent (103) of the construction estimate or 3200.00 whichever, Is greater, to secure the faithful performance of Developer's obligations as described In this Dan. IThe •dlntonance guarantee security shaft oleo secure the f althfpl parfpnanto by the Develo3er of any obligation of the Developer to do specified work wit- respect to any parkway -3- /311 maintenance assessment district Once the foDroeenent$ have been accepted and s maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other Improvement security described In this agreement may be released provided that such release Is otherwise authorized oy the Subdivision Map Act and any applicable City Ordinance 17. That the Developer shall take out and maintain such Public liability and property damage Insurance as shall protect him and ary contractor or subcontractor Performing work covered by this cgreement from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the work or from operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any Contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or Indirectly tmployed by said persons, even though such damages be not used by the negligence of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons The public tlablltty and property damage Insurance shalt list the City as addltonal insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, at well as the Developer, his contractors and his s,otontractors, and all Insurance policies issued hereunder shall so state. The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: A Contractor's llabI llty Insurance provsdinq bodily injury or death liability limits of not less the $300,000 for each (arson nrd $1,000,000 for each accident or occur ran Co. and property damage 11.bil- Ity ,sits of not des. then 5100,000 for each ICCl- dent or occurrence with an aggregato Itrit of $250,000 for class% which ep arise from the opera. tlons of the Developer In the performance of the wort herein provided B. Automobile liability Insurance covering all vehicles used In the performance of this agreement Providing bodily Injury liability limits of not lass than 5200,000 for each person and $700,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage ""'lily limits of not lets than $50,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not lass than $100,000 which is arise f -OM the opera• lions of the Developer or his Contractor In performing the wort provided for herein 2B. That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of Insurance eoveriny the specified insuri•cs Each such certificate $Nall bear an endorsement erecludlny9 the cancellations, or reduction in coverage of any policy as dances by Such certificate, before the expiration of thirty (70) days after the City shall have received notification by raglstered mall from the Insurance carrier As evidence of understanding the Provisions contained herein, and Of Intent to coeplY with same, the Subdivider has submitted the /pllcwing described Improvement security, and has affixed his signature hereto: /.3.r FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Orinctpal Amount: S84,000.00 Name and address of surety. MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: Principal Amount $42,000.00 Name and address of surety CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATIOM Type: Principal Amount: N/A Name and address o' surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: N/A Nam, and 8Y4ress of surety TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN NIThESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be duly executed and acknowledged with all formalities reaul•ed by law an the dates let forth opposite their 319n4turei I /7 Date .t4tPr by _2! ^ Developer —� gnatuyr r nta MAPOMAfm ACMNOW [)(IMeNT e swaa _California_ u Counraa lea AM<IO_ om Gwa ma SlZ one Xerrw.aer �ta9i..bbn�na. Leal'e Starr Roalllard W VMIYaNabaIN PYC aKlOnbl eONaYa Rlatnrd F. Rohif[no. Otractor •f to l OerelepuenS $ omK.Wha toww pmw, a •w d• mr eaua a am• atKton e�aaKa b q aM PtlKrl4 was etKNM IM wtrM M1MY111 L _ Konerwnavlcaoa,wd K. a wuere WKrM•trO.JpbM MmlM rapMraM e,Ka1a Y. .....�.sw.meeuu ..w.r,..,.r.ro rrm •.+•r urmr..n DEVELOPER'S S16RATURE MOST NE NOTARIZED 5- /a% CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMGA ENGINEERING nivista TIOWOMM pEMIT FEE SMME For I"mvment: Intvcr tar Levee anA Channel — Date: 10/8/8 owe a y: Ftlk Re at nce: rac as. City Drawing a. NOTE: Does not 1rtiWe current in for writing peTSflt or paveuent deposits OWTITy uni. ITT" _ pRICC AMOIAIT Constmeticn of the Interceptor Ls, 75 000.00 Levee and Channel fr,& the easterly teminus of Deer Creek O•ahna9e BouMary to the .1st levee of Day Creek spreading 9roumt. VQINEERING INSPECTION FEE 4 967.OD SUB TOTAL 7S COMO •RESTORATION /DELINEATION CASH Z — CWTINGERCV COSTS DEPOSIT (RCFUNDBLE FAITHFUL PERFORJINCE BOND (100%) NOMAIMENTATION sDETT ICASM) NIA LABOR NO MATERIAL BOND (50E) � rPomuent to City of Rancho Cetaeoega Nntclpal Cove. Title E. Chapter 1.08. Adoptln9 San Be amino C toyf O& Elkin. Ck pknaarI.S. a US), Mt tion /dellmatlm depmit shall Revtsed 1/84 %.3/ s' CITY OF RAAC00 CUCAMONGA IMIROVENEnT AGREEMENT TTRRAACCTT /1p5 Z AF,�OR 9FFSITF 5101 ,AEI0.11N0 11111.12946 RNOI ALL HER By THESE PRESENTS That this agrr, •.nt is made and entered into, In conformance with the provisions of the SY bdlvtston Nap Act of the State 01 California. and of the a Dplicable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamo eel lrordla a municipal cordoratlon, by nq a. and between Said CIS her hereinafter referred to As the City. and RAU'KkN ANJ 6AIA0 Oi Y f�11F0oMU. In[ nereirarter re erred to as in* e•e�oper YITNESSETH: TNAT, VHEREAS, Said Developer desire, to develop cart win real DIOp. r tY In said City a, sho.n on the conditionally aPPrared subdly if ion known as And YAEREAS, said City has establlehRd certain reauireuents to di me: by said Oe•eloier as prerequisite to approval of said iubd irtf ion genON 11 located at Ne as / said Developer a T FFORE. It Is ho,oby agreed by said City enJ by F. FORE. . t The Develop,, tereby agrees to construct at De t pper'a exDenif all Impr gvgcents de, tripod On Page 6 here - 01 •IM n two Ira no in, tram tot effective dolt hereof 2 This 491eenent shall Of erltct lYf an lht date Of the aoroagent h the COUn<11 of said City approving this agret6ent This a9remMt stall be In default on the Gay follow. inq the ilrft annl,arsary dote of said approval unless an Ratio. S l on of time bas been Ironton by said City N here lna /ter prodd- ed S. The developer may request an g.tensfon of time to 'hoplete the [eras ne re 0/ Such request shall be Submitted to the C'ty in .rittng not less than 70 days before the eeAfratfon Bate •ergo/• the fngll contain A Statement of circumstances n ueasita sing too ga:•ASIOn of time. The City shall have the right to fowler the Drarlt tans a/ this a9 Neegnt. Including the to n f t 0UCp4vi atan.di cost estimab. and improvement security, and ,' rr Sarin adjustment, he tMeretn If any substantial change has occurred during the term Ae Nat g tf tna Deltloper falls or ne9lec:S to complY with the Drovlslani a/ this a9 raiment. 2M City fAUi na -e the r19M ae , time to cause Bald provisions to be met OF any lawful me.A S• and thereupon recover from the Olv4IOP4r and/or his surety the /u11 cost and incurred 5. The Ov 1hall provide metered water s rrf to to ach lot of Said 46.010' =rot in Accardan ce with tog reyyu e latfen e to schedules, and fees of the Cucamonga County Vale, Olt t rf et. 6 The 0evelOW shall be responsible for reDlacwant, R: re loNHOn, Or removal of any component of any Irrigation water sy'I tom in conil set with tonstrurtion of required Improvements to satlsfactfnm of the C1ty Engbieer and the owner of such water system. -I_ /38 Tracts And •M, p.M T Improvements required to be constructed shall conform to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the lmprn.ment plan approved by and on file In the Oil q o1 the Clty Engineer Said Ieproreme nts are tabulated On the Canitr uctton and dond Ettloate, hereby Incorporated on pO90 6 hereof, AS to k On from the Improvement plant listed thereon by number The Developer the 11 also be responsible for construc- tlon o/ any transitions or other Incidental work into wad the tract boundarles as needed for safety and proper sea lace drainage Errors or omatsslons disc01ered during constructln shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer Revised +ark due to told pia. mod MCAt'pnf shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and Saco Ad Dy the surety covering the original planned works 8. Construction porn Its Thai be obtained by tit Developer 'eon the office of the City Engineer prior to start if Work; ail regulations listed thereon shall be observed, wi'.h attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nulsinre to the area, and to proper notification of public utl litlee a.id Illy Deparments fallun to comply with this section tAall be subject to tAS ptnaltla provided therefor 9 The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other dab-is from public rights -of -Way within or adjoining said development mulling from work relative to sold development. 10 York done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to co.pltte any and all Wort in the anent o/ unjust if t <d dram In completion, and to race er all cost and ..Dente Incurred froa the Developer and /or tali contractor by any Iawful means 11 Said Developer shall at all teats following dedica- Stan of the streets and eatesents In said subidl,lsion, up to the completion and acceptance of said work or Inprer eaent by said City Council, Alva good and adequate warning to the traveling pub I It Of arch and every dangerous condition aalstant In s ld stn tat or eestaent, and will protect the traveling public from such defect in tr dangerous conditions owl the COOpletlon of all Improvements, herein incorporated on Page 6 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as ImprovTments shall be under the charge of said Developer, Sold Developer may close all art: portion of any street subject to the conditions conlalato In a temporary street cloture permit. Jnutd by the City Engineer, whenever it Is necessary to protect the public dart tg the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be made 12 parkway trees required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other Improvement work, grading and cleanup has betn completed planting shall be done as provided by Ordlnence In acCOrdonce Nth the planting diagram appreued by the City Coney Ity Daselopeast ntret tar The Developer shall be responsible for %alntel nln9 all trees planted In good health until the and of ifs gyuaranteed maintenance period, o- for one year after planting. Whichever is later 13. The Developer Is eesionai6h for seating all candl- tlons ncaDlishtd by the City pursuant to the 31bdlrlslon •2- Miami.. /37 and no Improvement Security provided Iorelnwith shall be released before such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City 14 This agreement shall not terminate until the r: by gveranta: security hereinafter described has been raluse by the City, or until a now agreement together with the required Improvement security has been submitted to the City by A successor to the Herein named, and by resolution of the City Council fame has been accepted, and this agreement and the ImPrayement security therefor has been released is The improvement tacurity to be fur ni shed by the Oeve10Dar with this agreement shall consist of the following and shat, ba in a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. TO secure faithful Performance of this agreement 1 A band or bonds by one or core duly authorized Corporate sureties In the farm and content specified by Government Code Section 66499 1 Z An .eDravenent Security Instrument In the form and content specified by the City Attorney 7 A degas t with the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for secs,rfng 4epal, is of pub l it monies 6 To secure laborers and materialmen: 1. A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorized Corporate suraties- In the form and content specified by Govern t Code Section 66499.2. 2 An Improvement Seca qty Instrument In the form and content Specified by the City Attorney. A deposit wfte CIS of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for Securing C A Cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer Or s6rveyar whose certificate aonears upon the final Map for the I ttlnyy Of AS boundary, lot corner, and street Centerline monuments and for furnlshing centerline tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit say be any amount cartifiad by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable Payment in full; or, if no value Is Submitted. the Cash bond thall be is shown On the Construction and Bond tst'mte contalnea herein. Said cash deposit may he refunded as $00+ As Proce. dure permits after receipt by the City of the centerline rte notes and written assurance of payment In full fr co the engineer or surveyor./ 0 The required hondf and the principal amount, thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement. 16. The Developer warrants that the improvements described In this agreement $hall be free from defects in materials and workmanship Any and all Portions of the imorave. cents found to be defective within one (1) year following the data on watch the Improvements are accepted by the City (hall be rep at red Or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the Cf ty. The Delelo.ar shall furnish a maintenance guarantee f ecurit) In a sum equal to ten percent (101) of the construction est lmate or $200 00 whichever is gyranter, to secure the faithful Performance of USA �oper•s obligations as described In this para- 3r aph. The maintenance guarantee security Shall also ucure the .Ithfp, performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Deva toper to do Specified wort with respect to any Pa —tray .y. Ago estimate or 5200 00, whichever Is greater, to Struve the faithful Performance of Developer's obligations as described in this par&. graph The maintenance guarantee security %hall also secure the N lthful performance Ill he Developer of any obligation of the Oe Vol oiler to da specified work with raspect to any parkway Mntenance assessment dlstri.t Once the imprevt.ents have been opted and A maintenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other Improvement security described In this agrtemtnt may be released provided that such release it otherwise a athorited by the Subdivision hap Act and any applicable City Ordinance 17, That the Developer shall take out and maintain such public liability and property damage Insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing wort covered br lnls agreemtnt from claims for property damages which may arise because of the nature of the wort or from operations under this agreement whether such operations be by himself or t any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or indlr city ,.Played by sold persons, trtn though such damages be at Caused by the negligence of ins 0evaiopef or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons The public liability and property damage Insurance shall list the City as addltonal Insured and directly protect the City, its officer$, agents and employees, as welt && the Dart cost, his contractors and his subcontractors, and alt Insurance polities ftsued she I be as follows: he rounder shall %o rtatt The minl... amounts of such Insurance A. Contractor's liability insurance provldlnq bodily Injury or death liability limits of not lass the fS00,000 for each person art $1,000,000 for lath accident or cccurren -e, and property damage llabll. Ity limit& of not lass than 6100.0 00 for each accl- dent or occurrence with a, aggregate limit of S2SO.000 for claims which may arise from the opera. tions of the Developer in the performance of the work herein provided 8 Automobile liability Insurance covering a'1 vehicles used in the Performance of this agreement Providing bodily Injury liability limits o' not less the, $200,000 for each person and S300.000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $50,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate if not less than 5100, Ogee which may arise trod Ste tier,. ifens of the Developer or eel& Contractor It performing the wort provided for Lertl n. e 18. That before the taecutlOn of t Is agreement, the Otv,lep,'r shall file with the City • ctrtifiCAte or ce ifie,tes of Inter race coverany the specified Insurance Each such Carl f Ira te shall bear an ordorse.ent precluding the ^lacellatlons, or reduction to coverage of any policy evidences by s..h certificate, b• /an the au Milan of thirty (00) days aft,' the City shall have rlaaivej notification by registered mail from the Insurance carrier. As evidence of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of In to comply with rave, the Sub Iivlder has submitted the foI owing described improvement security, and has affixed his s l goature hereto: /y/ FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type! Principal Amount: $950,000.00 even and addle$% of $orety: American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa 600 5. Cocmon.eaith Ave.. Lot Angeles, Calif 90005 KATEAIAL AND LABOR PAINENT Type. Principal Amount: $165.000.00 Mane and address of surety: E�S. Commonwealth Ave.. Lai Angeles. Pa. 90005 CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: Name and address of surety: MAINTEMMCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: Nine and address of Surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have donate theft presents to he dub eancuted and actno0ed9ed .1th all formalities remuired by la. on the dates set forth opposite their signatures Date 2170186 by �F 1• A11-1 Developer p gna[un F'.awnno F `� -22 s'= —� r 1 nTed- -� yY,y ca Ifarnia u.r.ad Los Angeles }RR ��m.YY =Y. •.yyT On Frbra0ry 20th IggA mb °� Linda N V -^•say W wirvptlY4:mv P.yc vsmunvatpane RI&, ly ❑Fana^.eva me 13 Pm.tl Nw. w W Gr. el tmnf.mr.l w mm W mns,nl agent o.tl W wMnlmm,mwte ° t mwamaNdWmr nan.e.atlb^m•Webw WtW names ✓a.w m.owvf.w a.amttl a m11N[ST,ry h.Y mtl dEOY.nt MM ✓Y. d'Imurr AYY. u••• DETELOPED'S SIGNATURE HO %T BE NOTARIIED .S. En9Est CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EAG111EERInG DIVISION ENCRCA021111 PEPNIT FEE SCHEDULE For Imdroraeet: TR7CTS 12642 AND 12975.12944 - Offsite stow drain Oates 2/16/06 — tc+PUte l: n n File Run ereMV. :It7 Ora.,9 lo. ROTE: Does not Include current fee for rritinq pervit or puenent deposits OUXIT MIT ITEM PRICE A'IOUT 220 L.1 46' RCP 76.00 16,720.00 1000 L.F 72' CCP 150.00 150,000.00 600 L.F 64 RCP 200.00 120,000.00 1400 L.F 9f' RCP 250.00 750,000.00 7 EA. Manholes 5.000.00 35,000.00 EA. Transition Structures P,000.00 2,000.00 1 EA. Debris Basin 40,000.00 40,000.07 I EA. Wit Acquisition 50.000.00 50.000.00 Su Tctal 765,720.00 InCidantals 76.572.00 842,292.00 ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE SUB TOM 1 •RESIGRATI0.T /OELINEATION CA511 CONT:NOENCT COSTS DEPOSIT (RE119.1ABLE ) FAITHFUL PERFOR.VffE BOND (100%) MAIUISNTATION SURETY ICASN) LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (iG-) •Pmrsaaat to City of RAMCM Gttaonga MuiCipal Code. 71t1e 1. Claptx 1.08, adopting Set leaardlno County Code TIM M. Napten 1.5, a cash reAWAtlm /dolintatim deposit than be each prior to itsuanu of a+ Mlnrering Comtrectim ?"it. �ytr� i"I"d 2184 /y3 RESOLUTION NO. O (� - So A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CU FORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS, IMPROVEMENT SL'CURITIES ANP ,NAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 12642, 12935, 12936, 12937, ...d.8, 12939, 12940, 12941, 12942 AND 12943. WHEREAS, the Tentative Mip of Tract Nos. 12642, 12935, 12936, 12937, 12938. 12939, 12943, 12941, 12942 e-id 12943, consisting of 421 lots, submitted by Kaufman and aroad of Southern California Ind Marlborough Development Corp,iratior., Subdivider, located on tha northeast corner of Highland and Milliken Avenues has been submltt,l to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provivad in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said i.ity; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirenents established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agr:earnt submitted herewith for approve] and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and sutmits for approval sat! Final Nap offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated tnereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved Ind the Mayor 1s authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Nap delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 1986. AYES: NOES: ASSENT: Jon 0, a s, ayor ivy Tentative Tract No. 13131 was approved by the Planning Commission on October 9, 1985, for the division of 11.71 acres into 1 Int in the Medium Residential Development District located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Vineyaru Avenue. The Developer, Robertson Hanes, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $172,000.OD Labor and Material Bond: S 86,250.00 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.bR.s have also been approved by the City Attorney. RECOMIERDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract No. 131 31, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record Respectfully,subm4ed, , / CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ��uaf REPORT r. a / E: O O Z A DATE: March 5. 19e5 U ism > TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and improvement Security for Tract No. 13131 (D. R. 85 -17) located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue submitted by Robertson Homes, a division of Catwil Corporation Tentative Tract No. 13131 was approved by the Planning Commission on October 9, 1985, for the division of 11.71 acres into 1 Int in the Medium Residential Development District located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Vineyaru Avenue. The Developer, Robertson Hanes, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $172,000.OD Labor and Material Bond: S 86,250.00 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.bR.s have also been approved by the City Attorney. RECOMIERDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract No. 131 31, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record Respectfully,subm4ed, , / r.A • a CIT) OF RARCOO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR Tract 11121 XMA made and ente>nl nto.g lnT confarmanceT slthT the YrYHilCnsmOft the Su b4 a•isian Nao Act of the State of California. And of the 41011<l0 4 Ordinances of the Clt) of Rancho Cucamonga, Cal lTornio. a municipal corporation, by and bttAson Said City. hereinafter referred t0 at the City, and Robertson Noma. a Division of Catrll Care- hCrH liar ter rererrla to At the ere ra0er VITNESSETII: THAT. VhEREAS. Said Developer desires to develoe certain list Property Id Slid City 42 thorn an the Condltloni1Y Approved Suodlvl Sian know. as Tcsct 12121 and t0 be net byEU IJ laid to car, has QSt4bltSkld prexe0ulslte Certain to La00rcral lOf mss ld Subdivision generally located at 'HO n'.1 ease coaner 4I —A[90- et. and Tlnevard Ave ROV, TNERI ,'- ft 11 hereby agreed by Wd City and by Sold OntlaOtr es tot tort: The Developer `t u0ensa all '@prove n hereby en cis toad ono Page 6t N:r„ at o/ within to in months fras tae of f .described data hereof 2 Thll Agree,ent Shall be efftetivt an the date of the resolution of d.e Council of said City 40Prdt1n2 this 49 Ant This agreement that be In default an the day sailor• Inq tht first annlrerialy date of told approval unittt an eaten• Stan of list has been granted by H1d Clty at harem /ter Provid- 3 The a0 10mp left the terms ehereofr @Such rtguett n n Shall be Submitted to the City in writing net leaf than 20 dart before the aspiration Otte hereof, And shill contain a Statement of circumstances ntte f sitating the extension of time The City %hall nave the I 'On to rerlav ilia praylllans Of this agreement, lnfiuding the COnl tructlan ftlndlydi Cott estimate, and lmproVeeAn[ security, Ana t0 re0alre 4dlustatnt{ thereln if any %Ybitanes:1 Change ha[ occurred during the term htre0/ the 4 If the Derelaper falls 0r neglects to comply ith prorlsloAt of chit 19reteont• the City $hall hall the IT lit at 407 time to caYn said provisionI t0 bt met by any 1,. .1 en4ni, and thereupon recover Iros test On eloper aOdf Or his surety tM full Soft and RIP; to Incurred :,had. ,a to of The said OdtrealoD.ent hall 1h Provide <CerOancuttered lto the ere qulatlo nf� ln, and fen Of the Cucamonga Count] Water District. relgc&III . The Onelo Dar shall or removal be reSOOntlble for replacement. of any c" "be of any Irrigation riser s li NS In co—)"et with Conttructlon of required improvements to ene ntitractiOn Of the City Engineer and the owner Of Such sale, system -1• 1002 Cooley or Ste 102 Colton, Ca 92224 7. lmorartatnts regulred to be constructed %hill conform to the Standard Orarinq% and Standard Specifications of the Cie7, and to the Improvement plan approved by and on file In the office of the City Engineer Said Improvements are tabulated on the Construction and opond FttlmatA, hereby Incorporated on Page 6 hereof, as eaten /r m the Improvement plans listed thereon by numOrr The DeveiuPer shall also be responsible for Construc. tlon of any transitions or other Incidental wore beyond the tract boundar Nf AS nitd,d for safety and proper Surface drainage Errors or owls N Onf discovered during COnstruttln shall be car r et I upon the direction of the City Cnglnee• Revised wort due to told D'an modlflCAtlons Shall be corerAd by the Drools Ions of AAls agreement and secured by the surety cavtring the orlpinai planned Worts 8. Construction permit, Snail be obtained by the 0eveloPtr frac the office of the City Enq.n,tr prior to start of Wort; all rt,olatlon$ listed thereon %hall be Ob%ervtd, with aIt tntIon given t0 Safety prllldnre,. control 01 dust. noise, 0• other nultan Ce to the area, and to proper notification of public ,Act l t In and City OeDartmentf Hilu re to comply with this /ectlOn ,hall be Subject to the Penalties provided therefor, all loose 9- rocksn and Developer a debris ,from Dubresponsible c r ghb �of say within or aololnlnp cald dtvU comsat rosy ltlnq from rare r*tell,# to at ld development dill tnt110. Wort done within main lag tercels shli be to ca.Dtet $any and to ail .art silo *the 'a re vet of sun unjustified the delay Commlello n, 4n0 to RcOrV all cost and .spent, Inc.•rtd from the DevaioDtr and /er his Contractor by any lawful mean, 11 Said Developer shall at all times faliorinq dedlu- llon or the fen Sts and easements In Said subldiv l flan, a, to tM comPillion and acceplanCt of told wore Or ImprOrteeat by said city aOf cllashq land ,.od and adequatt rIr,JAq to the traveling cry Pang a r n u, candlt,cA atlstent ,n said air ett or tastmtnt, and rill protect the trartling public from such defective Or dangerous Conditions. Until the COmDietlOn of all Improvements, hertim InCDIpOra -,d on Page d , to be Performed . each of sold ,[nets not accepted as laPr OrtaentS $hall be under the Charge if said 0ecolope, Slid Otr,tape, may clots 411 or a port,,, Of any street subject to the Conditions Contained in a temporary at•ee1 CIOSn,t permit issued by the C -ty Engineer, Whznt.,, It it aecCUary to pro l to be ad* 'Oct the pub lit mduring the construction of the I.proreaanb Mrel Agreed 12 partway trees required to be planted /halt b4 Planted by the Developer after tithe, I.PrUrevent more, gradlny and cleanup has been completed Planting shall be done ai pro vl did by Ordinance In accordance with the Diantlnq diagram ruled by the City Community Oa.e „Pae,t Director The Developer %hail be respon,lble for maintaining all treat PI an t to In good health until the And of the qquaNntetd latet4mance poled, or for One Year after planting, whlcherer Is I2. The Dertloiler Is re, DOnaibie for wtlnq all c,ndl. 9 stuns utabll%Md py the Clty psuant to the Sub dl vision .2- // ar and no Impr0ve11ent Security provided herelnrlth +hill be released 0*fare such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City la This agreement shall not terminate until the talntenanc guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until A new agrtement together with the re0u fired Im Dr,ytment stcurlty has been Submitted to the City by a so CC *ffor to the heroic. named, and by resolution of the city Council tame hat bven accepted, and this agreement and the lop rOnment stcurlty therefor hat been released 15 The laorovement ucurlty to be furnished by the pen loner rl th Shit agree:." shalt consist of the following and shall be 111 a form acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful Ptlfaruanem Of this agreement I A bond or band+ by one or more duly authorized corporate sureties In the form and content sneHfltd by Government Code Section 66499 1. 2 An bDrar cent Security Instrument in the fore and content specified by the City Attorney. 0 A de Do Sit with the City of money Or n*gotlabte bonds of the kind approved for %etur lag IOPOSlas of public 410111.1. 6 To secur* laborers and materialogn: 1 A bond Or bands by one or core duly authorized Corporate suretlts In the form and content Specified by Government Cade Section 66,99 2 and can ant - Specified by the City Attorney.•-'_ 0 A deposit rlth City of coney or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the segintar or surveyor vhate certificate appears upon the Final Hap for the %***illyy of all bounder„ lot corner, and street Centerline m„uments and for furnishing c*nterllna tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the *nglntar or serrtyor as Acceptable payment in full: Or, If no •glut Is Sibmltted, the Cash bond shall he a. -horn an tht Construction and bond Estimate eantal.:d herein Said Cash deposit may be refgnded as soon as price. duce permits after receipt by till City of the centerline t1* not*% and written Assurance of payment In full free the engineer or surveyor, 0. The required bonds and the principal amount, thereof are tot forth on page 6 0f this agreement. 16 The Developer warrants that the improvements xdescribed In this agreement shall be fell from defects in erlals and workmanship Any And all part,,,% of the Improve. ments found to be defective within one (1) year followlnIt the data on which the level, r events are aectpted by the City shall be repaired or realized by Developer free of all charges to the Cite The of 810001 shall furnish A maintenance guarantee I'c drily In a sum equal to ten atrCent (10%) of tna construction astlmat• ar $200 00f whichever IS 1lemter. t0 Secure the faithful perfoanent* of DertlCpv'S abllgat ens as described In this Para. IRph The mainttfl AnCe guarantee Security shall else secure the althyul perform,nte by the Developer of any obligation of the Oen l epsr to do Specified work with rtsp,et to any parkway -y Mnftw- -/5-0 0ft_aat# av $200 00, vhi,ho.0, Is greater to rearm the faithful per f oraanee of O#veloptr s ebllgatlons as described 11 this par&. graph The maintenance guarantee sec rlty shalt also secure the f althful performance by the Oev #toper of any obligation of the Developer to da Specified wort with respect to say partway .lalenanCO asieesm,nt do %lriet. Once the Improvements have been accepted and a meant anance guarantee ncurlty his been accepted by the Clty. the other 1mprpyement security described In this agfeeeent may be relialea provided that such rel ate It otherwise authorltte by the Subdivision Map Act and any dp Dlle able City Ordinance $T that the Developer shall take out and maintain such hie and lability and property damage insurance As than protect a any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered Y this agreement from claims for property damages Which may Vise btcause Of the nature of the ware or from 0Da r at Ions unde• to is agreement, hether su:h operations be by himself Or by any ea rir ax for or subcontractor, or anyone directly or Inds rest ly Opio))td by said person%, Oren though loch damages be not caused by tf�a negligence of the Developer o- any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by said persons The public lid b Ili ly and Draper ty duage Insurance shall list the City as add none insurrd an d "City protect She City, its officers, agents and bole yowl, As welt as tram pere"aper, h i contractors one nil sue c0 nerd ct ors and tII Insurance policies Issued hereender than to it at• TAe minaum eepunti o1 eecA Insurance Shall be is folio.$ A. Contractor y liability Insurance PlavldinS bodily InJury or death lability ll.ltf of not less the S30a.000 for lath person and S1,000,00a for each accident or occurrence, and prooerty damage "Sabi,. Sly limits of not lets than Si00,00u far each Axel. dent or occurrence vIth an oS9regat# Unit of 1250,000 for claim, which nay grist from the o0ora- tlons of the Otvtloper Sn th• pofarme race of the Ware herein provided a Automobile liability Insurance covering all Vehicles wild In the performance o1 thlt agreement Providing bodily iAJury nobility limns of not Ins than $200,000 far each parson and S300.000 for eech accident or occurrence, and Property damage "ability licit% of not stn than $50 COO for each Acc l dtnt or occurrence. With an aggregate of not Its% the, 1700,000 which nap arts# from the Opera. tions of tn< Developer or his Contractor In performing the Ware Provided for here fn. I! That before the eeecut,0m Of this agreement, the I. O 'go' !hall file With the City t Certificate or certificates I. afumince covering the fDAClf led insurance Each such eertlflutf %hall Oear an tndwrfeaent Precluding the c ncelationf, or reduct on In coverage of Any Dellcy n/deeces by such certlflrato before the tepwtlon of thl -ty (30) dare after the Clty Shall bare received natifiutlen by rt 9lilered melt Ira. the Ineurane, carrier At nleenct of understanding the provisions contained herein, and of Inlet to comply with so on the Subd.vlder has fubmltted the following described Imeroveetnt securl ty, and hat affixed his fignturt hereto: /S/ FAITHFUL PERFORMAMCE Type Principal Amount: $173.300 00 Reliance Insurance Company Meet lad address of surety: P.O. cot 15901 lacrammnto. CA 95853 MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type' P Reliance I nrincimuranpce al Asounl: 3 86,350.00 Meet and addreni of surety: P.O Ro• 15901 Caepany L euetnto. CA 95853 CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION TyPe: Principal Amount: $ 1.730.00 M4e0 and add all of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount N/A Meet and address of surety: TO ME POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE MT THE CITY IN Weill MEREOF, the partles hereto hire caused that* pre, ante to be duly *touted and *tknomltdged mith 011 /greaatiri required by lam in dates ilgnstures P// c t)ortn oDDON to their Date 147 -86 by �Ll —.Oenleper 9nuun David M. fisher ne — Date by ,0es eloper ---i qnt care Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga Ca l I'."" `a -al to ronr atleo COgpOMTN A"NO WLNOOyehR sweet f nun Lfi— — Y 1w� l5 n nted tn.and.,.,gn.e M«rrwD.c PaNO^»r+awm.d ' 0(e..aoevp area.* ro.w ���• 'p��r'— �I•�V naMq 1M e�NM InaOwnanin - �r�-- at�dt�i a,ewna WCerpa. awn xn�ica�.N. �md9ae:e ne pw mmtaparauan a.wwwu ^e `y,ft,,,. CITY OF RAMP =4ORCA • - ENGINEERING DIVISION [NCROWWRT PERMIT fit SCREOLLE For Iwrevement: Trott IJllt vlrn .cd A'WM /Anov/Deer Cut, Data; Jawry moue y; ,beau, ream a vmadtcR File Re ermue -city Ora.ing No. "OTC; Does not Inc••de =,rent In fw wltlbg permit or Pavement depoSits L.F. R.C.C. Curb - II• C.F 24• gutter 7.2! r 911 L.F P.C.C. Carb . 6• C.F 24• gutter 6.0 L.F. '.C.C. Curb only 5.51 L.F A.. bens 4.S( •.u+ SJ 1• P.C.C. sidNalt 1.7! _JES_ SJ Drive up"AO 2.9 1 742 S.F 6• P.C.C. Crow gutter Oft.:urbl Ya( +.ern C.T. Street nCAVA11 n C.Y Forted embnt embarkment I.R Sl.l17_- S.f Preparation of subgrace 0.1! S.F. Crushed Agq, base low Inch thick) 0.01 - TOR A.C. over 3700 tons) 27.O III TOR A.C. 900 to 5700 tons) 35.0 •__ T00 A.C. 500 to 9d0 tons) 13- 4S.O TON A.C. under S03 tons) MCC S.F. A.C. thlct) 0.61 S.f. Pate A.C. (trench) 1.71 in All S.F. 1• et.lct A.C. overlay 0.70 G. AdSutt serer manhole to grade 250.00 G. Adjust St w Clean out to grade 150.00 G. AdJutt later &Ills to grade 75.00 _ q_ [A. Strut lights 1000,00 L.F BarriuGCs (Interact. SS00 stn) 1.00 L.I. 2 A a• redrdod header 1.75 S,r Amo,,, of A.C. pavemt en 0.15 L.F. RMVII of P.C.C. Curb 7.10 L.F Rmo it of A.C. I" 1.00 EA. Street signs 200,00 L.S. S1 nalicatlon L.S. L.S. S.F Strfolm Reb L.S. 'TNa TOR nmq wll Agg"pta base 20.00 7,00 C.T Controls structures 425.00 L.F Ill. ace 2000 01 29,00 00 L.F 24• RCP ISoo 0 15,00 L.f 16• RCP 2000 0 49.00 L.F as- RCP 1200 0) 76.00 G. Catch basin Y • a' 2000.00 1 G. Cato basin R • 14, 1600.00 EA. Catch basin R • 22' 4500.00 -_ EA. Local deprnsim 4• 500.00 G. LOCal depression 12' 1000.00 T EA. %=tl" structure 6000.00 G. Outlet structure. Std #SO$ 1500.00 G. Outlet structure. Std #507 500.00 G. Guard pest: L.F Guard panel (wad) ZS,00 L L.f Sa t 2,00 G. HeadrUl N6• .109) 1000.00 - L.F led.00d header 1.75 TG S.F Landtapt�p 6 Irrigation 2,75 L.F. RJII Curb IP.C.C.) ?.SO ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE _].s2r 00 SOE TOTAL +RESTCRATIMELINIATION CASH _redo oo CONTINGENCY COSTS alp.,Ir (REELry0A6LE MTNFCL PtUCILMANCE QJna (IOOS) MOmR'iNTAEION SWETT 'CASH) I -M 0o LAJ= AIM MATERIAL BOPO (505) .n.oe �LNN.pO Im.M nr. m '"Mt to city Of Rnr'An Cucasa.Ta Municipal Coe*. Title 1. Chapter 1.00, adopting San Bernardino county Code Titles. Oupters 1.5, a Cash restaraslm /dellrtatim deposit malt be made prior to IS%lum a of an Engineering Cmstructlm Permit. Rallied 7/64 /53 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P 0 Boa N07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91710 Gentlemen Pursuant t0 Chapter Ae Article 9, Stctlon 66497 of the Government COW the undersigned hereby agrees •hat all monuments shown on the final map of Trart [31]1 art to 04 set and furnished by the SubdiTls engineer or surverCr on or befOre arch 967 as specific, In the In 9lneer s or urveyor t tits cotT a d"a allots to fur"11% the notes thereon to Camalate alt .nglneerinq requl..... is specified In Section 66497, of the a....... nt Code Tht Undersigned hands you herlulth the sus of 1 1.150.00 as a Cash depaSlt, said dapollt to guarantee t at t A.eonuents will be all and the natal furnished as above Provided an or Defer• the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor will be Palo by the undersigned It Is further understood and Agreed that in the rent the undersigned flits to com Plttt the above requlr.ment% within the tier specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorlted to Complete Said requirements or cause them to be completed and the Cost thereof is to be a charge against Said cash deposit, and the City Of Rancho Cucamonga is autharlied to use the necessary transfer from Said Lath deposit to the credit for the proper city fund It IS further agreed that If the Undersigned does not present evidence t0 the City CO'ncll that he has paid the engineer or a urve For for the tatting of the final monuments, and If the 1ny Inter or surveyor gsTo/ the nOtlCes presCribed In Stttlon 65197 of the Goven,ment Coal, the City Shall PAY to sold antlnur or surveyor, the cash depaslt her ain made If the cost of COepletlnq laid requirements taemeds the lm..nt of the Cash deposit, the undersigned &great to ply the difference within thirty (70) dart after receiving written Star .... t free the City of Rancho Cucamonga specifying the amount of the dif or .8 CA between the Lath deposit and the actual cost of sale requirements cordially, �� -- _• Subdivider Robertson Moro• (navld W. fisher) Address _6651 Embareacero Utive t Ryn. CA 45309 Pate 1 -27_66 The depotiter of record (for return of any portion of the Cash deposit) shall be Dallas Christian 1007 C..I.z Or.. lte. 107. Colton CA gl]la mesa Ortl. NOTE: TO BE SUSMITTEO FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED /S7 RESOLUTION NO. =.M-M $(a - S/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL W OF TRACT NO. 13131 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13131, consisting of 1 lot, submitted by Robertson Homes, Subdivider, located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Vineyard Avenue has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated the -eon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: 1. That said improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certlf rate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 1986. AYES: NOES ABSENT: —1cn 0. Mikels, ayar CITY OF RANCHO CUCA51ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March S. 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hibbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 12237 -1 (Vista Grove Avenue only) located o., the east side of Hermosa at the north City limits, submitted by Fist Federal Savings and Loan Association of Sal Gabriel Valley and releasing the Improvement fgreement and Improvement Security submitted by Dick Scott, Inc. for Tract 12237 -1 (Vista Grove Avenue only). First Federal Savings and Loan Association of San Gabriel Valley, 1s submitting an Improvement Agreement and Security for Tract 12237 -1 (Vista Grove Avenue on,y) to replace the Improvement Agreement and Security submitted by 01ck Scott, Inc. and approved by Council on August 17, 1983, in the amount of: Faithful Performance Bond: $46,000 Labor and Material Bond: $23,000 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution r- leasing the agreement and security submitted by Dick Scott, Inc. and accepting the agreement and security submitted by First Federal Savings and Loan Association of San Gabriel Valley and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Res ctfully submi ted, / GV ' L H:' bgl Attachments /S-4 C. -Y OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT , DATE: March E. 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 12237 -1 (Vista Grove Avenue only) located on the east side of Hermosa at the north City limits, submitted by Fist Federal Savings and Loan 6ssociatlon of San GdbrleU Vall ^y and releasing the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security submitted by Dick Scott, Inc, for Tract 12237 -1 (Vista Grope Avenue only). First Federal Savings and Loan Association of -n Gabriel Valley, is submitting an Improvement Agreement and Security t Tract 12237 -1 (Vista Grove Avenue only) to replace the Improvement Agreemer nd Security submitted by Dick Scott. Inc. and approved by Council on August 1983, in the amount of: Faitlful Performance Bond: $46,000 Labor and Material Bond: $23.000 RECOMlO:MDATION It is recommended that the City Louncil adopt the attacmed resolution releasing the agreement and security submitted by nick Scott, Inc. and accepting the agreement and security submitted by First Federal Savings and Loan Association of San Gabriel Valley and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Respectfully submltvted, G� IH:0 L bgl Attachments /5-4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMt MT FOR TRACT RO. 12257.1 Igor Vista Grove Street Oni /) RNOW ALL MEN ET rHESE PRESERTS That this agreement is made and entered Into. to Conf OrmaDCe with the Pf DVISIOnf Of the Svbdlvlttun Map Act of the Slate of California, and of the aPPllCable Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said Clty, hereinafter referred to at the City, and Fl Sacco] Sa yingn and loan Anoc istion of San Gabriel Valle Mrtlna rot er ril'erre he eq oper WITNESSE14: THAT, WHEREAS, slid Developer desires to develop Certain real pr costly In sold City at Shown an the Conditionally approved subdivision known as Tract Am. 12257 -1 ; and WHEREAS, said City has asta111shed certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to approval of sold subdivision generally located at lM north ❑tv Melts nn Ina ant side of Pietro's Are-,,, NOW. THEREFORF. It is heraby agreed by said City 'd by said Developer as follows: 1 The Oevel000r herewy agrees to construct at Developer's expense all Improvements des•ribed on Page 6 here- of within twelve months from the effective date hereof. 2 This agreement shall be affrctive on the date of the resolution of the Council of set. City soproving this agreement. This agreement shall be In default Cn the day follow- ing the first anniversary date of said approval unless an eitem- ston of time has been granted by sold City as hereinafter provid- ed 5 The Developer may request an ascension of time to complete the tarot hereof Such request shall be submitted to the City In writing not less than 50 days )&fore the expiration date hereof, end shall contain a statement of clecuastancal necessitating the extension of time The City shall have the right to review the provisions of this agreement. Including the co'struCtiOh standards, cost estimate, and Improvement security, and to require ed5ultmentt thereto if any substantial thange hat octirred during the term horanf e If the Developer faits or neglects to comply with the provisions of this agreement, the City .Shall have the rlyht at any ties to cause said provisions to be not by any law III sea's, and thereupon recover fro% the Developer and /or his surety the jai; Cost and expense Incurred S The heysloplr shall provlde metered wstar ferrite to each lot of said development In accordance with the regulations, Ichedula S, and rna of the Cucamonga County Water District 6 The Developer shall be responsible for replacement. relocation, or removal of any comPOesnt of any Irrigation water System im Conflict with construction of required Improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the nuner of such water system. 1 Tint Federal favin9s and Lan Aisacbt on of San Gabriel Valley 215 M. gaming Weft Covina, CA 91795 Tracts and Cone /Ind. D.M. /S'7 7. Improvements required o be conitrocte. shall conform to the Standard 011-1"21 and Standard SoeNflratlons of the City, and to tee 10010vennt plan approved by and on file In the office of lh. city Engineer s -d Improvements are tabulated an the COn$trvetlon and land Estimate, bareby, Incorporated on pope 6 hereof, n taken from the IfYronment plant listed therton by numb or The Developer shall also be responsible for construe. tine 0/ and to of ltlenf Or Other Incidental wort beyond the tract Errors as " "den for % afetr and Dr Opt, surface drainage ['von or 0m1 isslcnf discovered during consoruclln shall be car rytteit upon tLe direction of the City Engineer Revised work dot to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of it agreement and secured by the surety covering the original Ill anne0 war as 1. Construction permits %list be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City [nglnrer prior to start of We all regulations Ilse eel thefean lba•1 OA oDHrveO. with attention plrnn .0 Safety DrO Hdu rAs. Control 0f dust. n01 H. or other "visa_* to the area, and to prCper notification Of poetic utllltl0 and City Deptetaenq failure to comply rltb this Section shall be Sublets to the Oenalllas prorldwd therefor 0, In' Developer (ball be r"ponilale for removal of all IOOSI feces and Other debris from public egrets- of.wey within or adjolning said development resulting from wart relative to fold development IO Valk done within ev1stlng streets $ball be dlllgeatly pursued to coepletton; the City Shall have the right t0 co 610 any and all work in the event Of unjustified delay In Ca on Allen• and to 'tea,*, all Cott and .pease Incurred from the NZOper and /or hl$ contractor by any lawful means 11 Said Developer shall at all times following dedica. tlon of the streets and taltment% In said ypldlvlsitn• up to the CCoalltion and acceptance of said work or Improvement by said Clef Council, glue good and sde0o4t• morning to the trarallny pool lc of mice and ev efy dangerous c1ndlt -on as sitnt to Hid street Or us"ent, and will protect the traveling public Team such Wfectiva or dangerous conditions Onlil the C"I'latlon of all 1- 0.01ement%, befall Incorporated an P ope 6 . to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as Improvements shall be under the charge of said Ceveloper Said Developer way close all Or a portion Of any street Subject to the Conditions Contal *ed in A teeporarg street Closure garelt.,j"ued by the City Englnot'- whom"*' it Is nCCesaarY to protect the Public during No eonstrectiom of the W'ovemfnls etreta agreed to be fade 12 part.,, trees required to be planted /hall be planted by the Developer after other Improvement •Oft jeweling and cleanup hot been completed planting %bell be cane as Provided by Ordinance In accordance with the pUntlng diagram approved by the City Community Development Director The Developer /halt be responsible for mintavning ail tree, planted In goad health until the end of the yyu+rant t*A mintenance penal. or for One year after planting. wbtcheaar ed later Is 17 the Developer I% respons" for =toting All cored1. tlan, established by the City pursuant % tae Subdivision .2. /S and no leproveeent security provided hereinvith %hall be released t stare such acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City la This a9roteent snail not ttrminats until the aSl ntenonce guarantee security hereinafter described has been s,leased bl the City, or until a new agreement togain.' with the required ImproltOtAt security has been submitted to the City by a euccesvor to the herein named and by resolution of the City Council sua his been accepted. and this agreement and the Improvement seoaelty therefor nos been released is The Impro NtnI secuf lty to be furnished by the Developer wltn this agreement snail consist of the following and shall be In a f0rn acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful perfolainC of this agretment 1 A band or bonds by one .r Gore duly authorized corporate sureties 'n the form and content specified by Gower-aent Code Section 66499 1 2 An Imprays,emt .*car Ity Instrument In toe form and content s ecified by the City Attorney. y A deposit .'in the City of Gamey or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public manieS S. To Secure laborers and materlalm*nt 1 A bond or bonds by one or +ore duly authorized corporate Sureties- in the fare and content sptcified by Governpert Cade Stolen 66499 2 2 An Improvement Security Instrument In the form and content sptcifitd by the City Attorney y. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bands of the kind approved for %,curing C A Cash deposit with the City to guaranis, payment by the D9vtlo0er to the engineer or surveyor whole ctrtiflcate appears upon the Final Hap for the settlnyy of all boundary, lot corner, and strmat cents rl lot monuments and for furolshing centerlint tie salts to the City The amount of the draostt may be any Grunt certified by the engineer or surveyor as acceptable payas,t in full: or, if s,0 value Is submitted, the cash bond shall be as Shown on she Construction ant Band Estimate contained herein Said cash deposit may be refunded as saes as proce. du•e permits after receipt by the City of the ctnterllne tit notes and written assurance of payment In full from the engineer or Surveyor ./- D The required bands and the principal amounts thereof are set forth on page ' of this agreement 16, the Developer warrants that the Improvements described In this agreement shall by free from dtf,Ctt in materials and worlmanship. Any and all Portia n of the Improve- ments found t be defective "Into Coe (11 year follpNnq the data on which the lmoravt.ents are accepted by tht City .halt be rapstred or replaced by Develapv free of all charges to the City The Developer shall furntlh a malnttmance gutrantta f ecurity In a sun equal to ton percent (10 %) of in, Constructioa utI.at• or $200 00, whichever It Pr titer. to secure the faithful performance of Developer's obllyat1ons as described In this par,. graph ins maintenance guarantee security Shall also secure the faithful performance by the Devtlooer of any obligation of the Developer to do spec 'fled wort with respect to any partway .y. / ,59 estimate or 3200.00, whichever is greater, to secure the faithful performance of Oertloptr's obligations as described Ia this para. Irish The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the aithful performance by the Developer of any obligation of the Der•I apt, to do specified work with respect to any parkway maintenance atsess.e.t district Once l4e Improvements have been accepted and a maintenance guarantee security 41s been accepted by the City, the other Impro.e.tnt security described to this agrermant may be released provided that such release Is otherwise author iced by the lubdlrislon nap Act and any arpllcable City Ordinance. 17. That the Developer shall take Out and maintain such Public liability and property damage Insurance is shall protect bin and any contractor or subcontractor performing work covered by this agreement from claims for property damages •etch nay arise because of the nature of the work or from Opera eau under this agreement, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or Indirectly employed by said persons even though such damages be not caused by the negllgtno of the Developer or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed by Said persons The public liabI llty and property damage Insurance shall lilt the City as additonal Insured and directly protect the City. Its officers, agents and uployus. as well I the Developer, his contractors and hit subcontractors, and all insurance policies Issued hereonote shall so state The minimum andunts of Such Insurance shall be as follows: A. CCntrattof's liability Insurance pro, ding bodily N,A r pr death liability limits of at lets •ha 3700,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and properly damage llab.l. Ity limits of not lets than $100,000 for each acct. dent or occurrence with in aggregate limit Of 5250.000 for claims watch may arise from the opera. tiara of the Developer In the performance of the work heret. provided a Automobile liability insurance covering all Vehicles used In the performance of this agreement providing bodily Injury Ilablllty limits of not 1. at than $200.000 for each Perko. and 3700,000 for each accident or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not lest than 350,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of at less then $100,000 which may &rise from the opere- tivnt of the Developer or big Contractor In performing the work provided for herein. l Id. That before the execution of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a certificate or certificates of insurance covering the spetlfled Insurance Each such Oertlfi tace shall ear as endorsement precluding the canctllatlons, or reductlan in coverage of any Ocllcy evidences by such certificate. before the expiration of thirty (70) day, after the City Shall have received fiOtiflaatldn by registered mall fran the l.surince carrier As e.ldence Of understanding the VOwlslonS Contained Wale. and of intent comply with sue, the 5vbdtvlder has submitted the following described Improvement security, And has Wised his I tgnature hereto: & L) FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Principal Amount: S16,ODO.00 name and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Type: PIInCloal Amount: S23,000.DO Name and address of surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type: Principal Amount: N/A Sant and address of surety: MAINIENANCE GUARA%TEr Type: ount: Nlme and address of surety: TO RE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE IT THE CITT IN WITNESS HFAEOF, the parties hereto hale causet these presents to be duly executed and ACanOw1e49ed with all formaitties required by law on the oases set Forth Opposite their signatures Date ,ci -f1i by i �f .Developer naturA _ nne Date fi - /) -a - Oy '%A•o ,Offelo0er go D e v fir n e Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Ca111ornia A Municipal Corporation 6y: Mayor Attest: _ City Clark Approved: DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST DE NOTARIZED -S. WAkTtTT MIT CogESt PRICE AMOUNT CITY OF WORD CUCAMORGA P.C.C. curb . 12• C.f 24• gutter EMGIREERINO DIVISION �S- L.F Fetll0AOtW PCOMIT FEE SC11FOM Far Imrmcaentt Tract no 0217 -I Da te• OnVU D19 n File Ae once: City WA+mq e21 a-�,n�s��yR- 4.50 Sam DOTE: Ones mt I clufe torrent fee fee a- P.C.C. slde+alk wiling Permit ar Wallets deposits WAkTtTT MIT ITEM PRICE AMOUNT L.F P.C.C. curb . 12• C.f 24• gutter 7.25 �S- L.F P.C.C. curb . 8' C.F. 24• getter 6.00 L.F P.C.C. curb Only 5.50 -6ii L.F A.C. be. a-�,n�s��yR- 4.50 Sam S.F a- P.C.C. slde+alk 1.75 S.F Drive approach 2,50 S.F 8• P.C.C. cross gutter list, cu") 7.40 -Otf y C.T Strait e.ta•atiOn 1.50 TSOS C.T Igerted eoDanaamt 1.50 1i -21Q� S.f "Paratim of S +0yreJo O 15 0.01 1 ran M S.F. TOE Crushed a9g. base EPK inch thick) A.C. (mK 3700 toot) 27 00 -_ TOS A.C. to I10o tons) 15.00 TOM A.C. 500 t0 900 ton) 45.00 TON (((19011 A.C. under 500 tmsl 60.00 17.4M M S.F. A.C. 1• thick) 0.55 S.F Patch A.C. (trench) I.7S S.F I• thick A.C, m"141 0.70 EA. Adjust it+er saMOle to grade 250.00 EA. Adjust serer clean out t2 grads 150.00 EA. Adjust rater wlrti to great 75.00 U. Strett lights IUW.00 1- &9if0- L.' B Ic.dcs Interne•.. 5500 ainl 1.00 _ _ L.f 2 a 4- redrood header 1.75 S,f Removal of A.0 paladins O.35 - -- L.F. Rooral of P.C.C. curb 1.70 -- L.F Remsal of A. -. ben I.OD EA. Street signs 200,00 EA. Reflectors and posts 75.00 L.F Concrete black +all 25.00 S.F Retalnln9 wll 20.00 TOt Aggregate bm 7.00 C.T. L.F Concrete structures 18• RCP (((2000 D)) 425.07 _ 29.07 -TrI M _ l.F 2t• RCP 1500 0) 75.00 L./ 16• atv 2000 0 49.00 L.F 48' RCP 1200 D) 76.00 EA. Catch basin Y • 4• 2000.00 Z EA. Citch basis u • B' 2900.00 2 m EA. C4im basin J • 22' 4500.00 m Local depression P 50(1.00 EA. Local deartsstan 12• 1000.00 EA. Junction structure 5000.00 EA Outlet structur . Std /506 1500.00 14. Outlet structure• Std 0507 500.00 EA. 6uerd wits 40.00 L.F Ward penal (road) 25.00 L.f Shut 2.00 EA. McAd.411 118• slog) 4000 .00 L.F Red ow Mader L75 S.F LMiupinip 6 11111111" 2.75 L.T Roll cure `P,C.C.) 7 50 1 t.S Landsca Ping and stmt trees 7.000.00 W MERIAG INSPECTION FEE 2.19S.00 SUB TOTAL 42 770.50 'UtTORATIOVOILMIEATION CASH 1 nri .Ey.� COXIIRGENCY COSTS ��� DEPOSIT (AEFtMUME) FAIII&M PERFORMACE MONO (100%) MUMNTATIOI UMETT CASH) NIA IA651 AM MATERIAL 00 (WI) 'Pursuant to City of Rancho CKAROMR& MnnICIP&1 Code. Title 1. ChaPtK 1.08, adoptiaq Sun Bernardino County Cads TNN.Ies. CMpttrs 1 -S. A case mteration/dllnaatlOn depose &hall be aide prior to Issuance of ad Eoginea•iag tandems lm "It. Revised 7/84 /re .i, RESOLUTION NO. 409- 95.04fr F6 -Sa- A RESOIUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12237 -1 (VISTA GROVE AVENUE ONLY) AND RELEASING THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY APPROVED ON AUGUST 17, 1983. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on Marcn 5, 1986, by First Federal Savings and Loan Association of San Gabriel Valley as developer, for the improvement of oublic right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Hermosa at the north City limits , and WHEREAS, the installation of such rvprovements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property Tract 12237 -1; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said I- provement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City C1erL to attest thereto, and to release the Improvement Security and Agreement submitted by Dick Scott, Inc. and approved by Council on August 17, 1983, as Resolution 83 -139. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST Beverly A. Authelet-7U—ty er on 0. els,— Ftayo� 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCADSONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March S, 1986 TO: City Council and City Harager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engireer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 11793 located on the east side of Amethyst, between Highland and Lemon, submitted by Pennfield Homes - Alta Loma, a joint venture. Tract 11793 was approved by the Planning Commission on April 22, 1981, for the division of 15.9 acres into 47 lots in the Low Development District located on the east side of Amethyst betweer. Highland and Lemon. The Developer, Pennfield Homes - Alta Loma, a Joint venture, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond. $248,000 Labor and Material Bond: $124,000 Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. RECOWMDATIOR It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 11793, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. Respectfully Submfttd., i Attachments �4° T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR TR 11791 RMOV ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this aq,@*sent 1s made and entered Into, In Conformance with the prowls10ns Of the Subdivision Mao Act Of the State Of Cal forni,, and Of the 4001,Cab11 Ordinances of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal corporation, by and between said City, herylnafter referred t0 as the City. and �CHHyI[IA IpM23 -ALTA [DMA. O @v,a,e u,.,,,.re here/nu q'Trtl'trrt o at e ,clop@•. WITNESSETHi THAT, WHEREAS, Said Developer desires to develop certain real Pf*PertY in said City as shows On the Conditionally approved subdivision leave as TA 1174, : and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer es prerequilite to approval of meld subdivision generally located between H1aNland a to Arc. On the I/S Of A1lthest NOW, TMEREFORC. It Is hereby agreed by S Id City and by said Oes@4o0er as fall Ows: 1 The Developer hereby aortas to construct at DIVGIOOer•5 eAY@ese all 1m Drowew4nts described on Page 6 here- Of within twelve months from the effective date hereof Z This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council Of said City approvi,g this agre *sent This agretmest shall be In default on the day follgr- 1ny the first anniversary date of said approval unless so eaten - ad s Of time has been Brasted by said City as htrelnafter provld- j. The Developer may .lowest an extension of time to Co.. ate toe perms hereof Such reoUeSt shall be Submitted to too City in writing not lass than 70 days before the expiration date hereof, led shall contain a statement of Circumstances es4essltating the latenSICM of time. The City Shall have the Pig vet t0 review the provisions of this agreement, Inv lading the constructl*s standards. cast estimate, and Improve•aht $1 cur It y. and t0 require adjustments tnereie if Shy SUb Stantl41 Oheage has occurred during the ten hereof 4 If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the previsions of this allotment. the City shall 114.1 the right At any time to cause as l4 provisions to be met by any Swat means, and thereupon recover from the Developer and/or his surety the full Cost And expense incurred S The D@velOmer shall provide metered star service to each lot of said eavelopment In accordance with the re Spell schtdulas, and teal Of the Cucamonga County Water District. 6 The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any campCnent of Any irrigation .Star System In cohfllct with a0nstrutttOn of required improvements t0 the satlsfscti*s of the City Englnmer and the Owner of Such rater system. •1- ,Y , Tntts and Cms /Ind. P.M. /kls' I Improvements reautrtd to be constructed shalt Comfort, to the Standard Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement plan approved by and On file In the office of the Clay Engineer Sold loprovemants are tabulated On the Construction and land Estimate, hereby Incorporated On Page 6 hereae, as taken from the Improvement plans listed thereon by number The Developer shall also he responsible for conStruc- soma of any transitions Or other Iecldental work beyond the tract boundaries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or ommisslans discovered during ConstruCttn shall be corrected upon the direction of the City Engineer Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions Of this agreement sad secured by the surety covering the original planned works 1. Constructlon permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; al regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with act an tin given to safety procedures, Control Of dust. noise. Or other muisdnce to the sees, and to proper notification of public oil l l ttes and City Departments failure to Comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor 9. The Devoloper shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or edjolning said development resulting from work relative to sold development la. York done within emitting streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shall have the right to complete any and all work In the event of unjustlfled delay In completion, and to recover all cos. and uDseu incurred from the Otveloper and /or his contractor by amy lawful meant 11 Said Developer shall at all tint fallowing dedica- tion of the streets and easements In sold aubldlvlsiaa, up to the completion and acceptance of said work or Improvement by said Cot, Council, give good and adequate warning to the traveling Pub It of each and every dangtrous condition ealstant in sal street or easement, and As II protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous Conditions. Uattl the completion of all Improvements. herain Incorporated on Page g , to be performed, eeCh of said streets net ACCOPtod as Improvements shall be under the charge of said Developer Sold Der a loose may Close all or a portion of any strcet subject to the Conditions contained In a temporary street closure permit. Issued by the City En y roar, whenever It 1f ntcessery to protect the public during tau construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be •ids 12 Parkway tress required to be planted shall be ptannd by the Developer afttr other Improvement Air l, grading and Cleanup has been completed Planting shall be done as provldad by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram apse red by tie City Community DareI ant Director Tht Developer shall be responsible for .alatalnlog all trees pleated In good health until the and of the yuarteed maintenance period, or for one year after planting, rAltherLnr Is later 13. The Developer Is responsible for meeting all condi- tImbs established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision .2. /4 Map Act, City Orolances, and this agreement for the development, an far the maintenance Of all Improvements constructed thereunder until the &mprOVement Is acCmetgd for maintenance by the Cl Y, and nO Improvement security provided berelnwilo shell be released before such 4CCtptanCe unless otherwise provided and authorized by the City Council of the City le This agreement 'hall hat terminate until the maintemenca guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City, or until a new agreement together with the required ImOroeement security h4' been submitted to the City by a successor to the herein named. Rnd by rololuti on of the City Council 3124 has been accepted, and this agree ent and the Improvement security therefor has beer released 19. The improw*ment security to be furn!shed by the D4velepTr with this &.'*event shall consist of the following and soul De in • for- acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agnemant. 1 A bond or bonds by one Or •bra duly authorlted Corporate sureties In the fare and Content 2 An IOP'Qvementa Security Code Instrument elm tithe fore and Content specified by the City Attorney. J A deposit with the City of money or negotiable bonds at the kind approved for securing deposits of public monies B. To secure laborers and m&terlalmen: I A bond or bonds by One or more daly authorized corporate sureties In the form and content specified by Government COO* Section 66499 1 2. An Improvement Security Instrument 10 the fare and content specified by the City Attorney. J. A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing C. A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the final Map for the seetiny of all boundary, lot career, and street centerline monuments and for furnishing centnlfine tie notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any &mount certified by the engineer or Surveyor as acceptable payment In full; Or. If me velum Is submitted. the cash bond shall be as shown 00 the Construction and Bond tstimatt contained herein Said cash deposit may be refurded as soon as proce- dure permits after receipt by toe City of the centerline tie Role$ and written assurance of Payment to full from the engineer or surveyor D. The required bands and the principal &mounts thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement 16. The Developer warrants that the imprdveeeas, described In this agreement shall be free from defects In materials and wIrkMAOShIp Any and 411 portions of the improve- ments found to be defective within one (1) year foe low ing the data on which the Improvements are accepted by the City *ball be repalred o- replaced by 081eioper free of all charges to the City. The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee securtty In a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the caestructlo• �(O 7 tltlagtt Or $200 00, whiChever Is greater, to secure the faithful Performance of Developer s obligations as described in this para- graph The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure the it thful DerfpreanCe by the Developer of any obligation of the DtveloDAr to d0 specified wart with respect to any partway maintenance assessment district Once the Improvements have bean a CCtPted and a •a ntenance guarantee security has been accepted by the City, the other Improvement security described In this Agrelmtnt may be released provided that such release Is otherwise authorlted by the Subdivision Rap Act and any applicable City Ordinance !7. That the Oaretooer shall tote out and maintain such Dubuc liahility and property 4sna9t insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or subcontractor performing wart covered by this agreement from claims for property damages which may arise because or the nature of the wort or from operations under this 49taemant, whether such operations be by himself or by any contractor or subcontractor, or anyone directly or Indirectly mmpt0 Ted by said persons, even though such damages be not caused by the negligence of the Daveloptr ar any contractor or subconb actor or anyone amp toyed b7 said Parsons The public liability and property damage Insurance shall list the City as addltomel insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer. his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies issued hereunder shall so state The mtnlmum Anounts of such insurance shalt be as follows: A. Contractor`s Itabi lity Insurance providing bodily Injury or death liability limits of not less the $100,000 for each person and $1,000,000 for each accident or occirrenct, and property daugt llabil. fly limits of not lass than 1100,000 for each accl. dent or occurrence with an aggregate limit of 1250,000 for claims which may Arise from the Opera• dons of the Oaveloper In the performance of the wort berets provided E. Aa too obit. 1fa0fifty Insurance covering 611 want Its used In the performance of this 19reenent Providing bodily injury liability limits of not less than $2006000 for each person and $100,000 for each accident Or occurrence, and Property damage Ilability limits of not less than $50,000 for aatn accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than 1100,000 which may arise from the Opera. bons of the Developer or his '9ntr6Ctor in performing the wort provided for here.n. ld. That before the eaatutlon of this agreement, the Developer shall file with the City a Certificate or certificates of Insurance covering the specified Insurance Each such certificate shall bear an endorsement precluding the cancellations, or reduction In coverage of •my policy evidences by such cartlftcate. before the eaplretion of thirty (]0) days after the City Shall have racalved notification by registered mail from the insurance carrier. As evi dente of understanding the pr•vislons contained herein, and of Intent to coolly with saws, the Subdivider has Submitted the falioving described improvement security, ins has affi.ed his signature hnreta: /� F FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: principal Amount: $211,000 Name And address of Surety: MATERIAL AND LAS02 PAYMENT Type: Pt1ACIPAI Aepuat: S124,C00 Name and address of Surety: CASH DEPOSIT MONUMENTATION Type, Principal Amount: S1,5E0 Name and add.... of surety: MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: PrleClpat Amount: Name and address of surety: TO NE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE NT THE CI•F hereto have prH ��ts IN the SS duly CO...cut-dar ands attnoel.dgedCaused vith shall forcalltlef required by lac an the date% set forth opposite their signatures DENNNPIEID N .S -V.TA L40M, Oat* —ib.L Iby by a Joint venture Dole l ape, gnu ure DZW \Np its Man Venturee IDCNNPIEID OMfgDIQ'Ny; 1NC , At 0 r i a Gl aro /t Cu atlon i Date. ,Developer gnu ure Terre L. Gol to e, President r n e Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cat Vornla A Municipal Carplratien 1yi — , Mayor Attest: i y er Approved; DEVELOPERS SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARISED .5. Lill W I6VMU MVaJIRJe WINEERIXG DIY1S18A ENCROWKEAT PERMIT FE, SCIIE ULE For Emproveseent:_ _TTU=110. UT93 Date: COMpa a y: File Ae ermce: City Oraw.n9 No. YU \ NOTE: Does not Include carrent fee for Lriting Peron or paement deposits _QUANTITY UNIT I IIEN P PRICE A AmuX7 L.F. P P.C.C. Curb - 12• C.F. 24• gutter 7 7.2$ %.7 L.F. P P.C.C. curb - 81 C.F. 24• Litter 6 6.00 s s7 Irru L.7. P P.C.C. Curb only 5 5.50 L.F. A A.C. ben o 4.50 - --4=1 S.F. 4 4• P.C.C. sidewalk 1 1.75 7 74=07 S.F. D Drive approach 2 2.50 S.F. 8 8• P.C.C. Cross Niter (Inc. orb) 3 3.40 ' '1 2•-78: C.Y. S Street eacavatlon 1 1.50 C.I. l loported esbanleert 1 1.50 ..F. P Preparation of sub reds O O.Ic " "123OG - S a99. D O.Oa - 103 A A.C. ( o y a] S.F. A.C. 1• thick) 0.55 -75.7w. S.F. Patch A.C. (trench ) 1.75 2 T7 S.F. 1• thick A.C. overlay 0,10 EA. AdJbst serer wlhols to grade 250.00 EA. AdJust Serer Clean out to grade 150.00 EA. AdJuet rater valves to grade 75.00 EA. Street lights 1000.00 ?A nv+ L.F. Barricades (intersee. SSOO nln) 1.00 L.I. 2 A A• redwood header 1.75 7. 2oa S.F. RM,41 or A.C. paveeent 0J5 2,99, L.F. Recnal of P.C.C. cure 1.10 L.F. tr of A.C. Den 1.00 S .,.o. EA. Street Signs 239.00 i.`TtF7: LA. Reflectors block and posts 15.011 L.F. Atlanta ll wall 25.00 S.F. Attaining call 20,00 70.'1 A39rcgata base 7.00 C.T. Concrete structures 425.00 L.F 18• PCP 2000 0) 29.00 L.F. 24• RW 1500 0 35.00 L.F. 36• RCP 2000 D 49.00 L.F. 48• RCP 1200 p 76,00 EA. Catch basin V • P 2000,00 EA. Catch basin M • 81 2900,00 TvIId: EA. Catch basin 0 • 22• 4500,00 -- EA. Local depression 4• 500,00 -r_ EA. Local depression 12' 1000.00 -iMA:1 (A. JrnctlC4 structure 5000.00 EA. Outlet structure, Std 6506 1503.00 EA. Outlet Structure. Std 0507 500.00 _ -_ EA. Guard posts 40.00 F. Ward panel (wood) 25.00 =iw L.F Sawcut 2.00 - TTTZ -.1 EA. Headwall (48• wing) 1000.01 l.F Rcdrued Mader 1.15 T S.F. It dsrayrpin L Irrigation 2.75 1E0 - GF• S,;<,Llae rfacedr lot-A0 -- '•35:t INGIIIEERING INSPECTI0.1 FEE Slams 508 TOTAL 225.e16.[ •RDEPOSIT1(11 /DR IeFA7l0A CASH _ 1.nm COATIIIGENCT COSTS 10% _, . M1�MIFNWEON SURETY EICASA) 1.(5/510(7 LAlA60R JVW MATERRIIALALC9MO (50%) iaZGV.T Oernirllm County Rancho 1etpal codes 711,14 1. hapter1.00.QadoptiiDSSan be wide prior to ISCuanr. nI m F .1. «ri-5 r4 Cash r0- .._ Goldin State Sanwa Bank Tre// 793 Real Estate Department 111 South Lake Avenue Pasadena. CA 91101 (213) 195.9133 February 14, 1986 City of Rancho Cucmmonga 9320 Base Line, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA., 91701 (FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE) Irrevocable Authority to Pay 1 294/58- 86/20792 Gentlemen: At the request and for the account of PENNFIELU 110,+1ZS- ALTA LOMA, we hereby establish in your favor our Irrevocable Authority to Pay 1 294/SB- 86/20792 in the amount of $248,000.00. This Irrevocable Authority to Pay is available against your sight drafts drawn on Golden State Sanwa Bank, Pasadena, Calif- ornia, and accompanied by your letter certifying that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is entitled under its agreement with Golden State Sanwa Bank, relating to :ENNFIELD HOMES -ALTA LOMA. Said certification shall be final and binding on the right of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to so draw. The amount available under this Irrevocable Authority to Pay / 294/50 - 86/20792 will be reduced from time to time to the extent of payment of your drafts or upon your written authority drawn hereunder and upon your request, upon receivine from you a letter certifying the amount by which this Irrevocable Authority to Pay 1 294/58 - 86/20792 is to be reduced, and the amount that will be avails a i�T— Tereunder after such reduction. This Irrevocable Authority to Pay Expires on July 1, 1987, in the United States of America. We hereby undertake that your drafts when drawn under the terms and conditions of this Irrevocable Authority to Pay will be duly honored by us upon presentation. Please ensure that all drafts bear a reference to our Irrevocable Authority to Pay i 294/58- 86/20792 Very truly yours, Golden State Sanwa Bank, a California Corporation y , EXHIBIT •A' /7/ a Golden State Sanwa Bank Tg 1179.3 Real Estate Department 171 SCUM lake Avenue Pasadena. CA 91101 (210) 795.9103 February 14, 1986 Ci'_y of Rancho Cucamonga 9a20 Base Line, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA., 91701 (LABOR AND MATERIALS) Irrevocable Authority to Pay t294/SB- 86/20791 Gentlemen: At the request and for the account of PENNFIELD HOMES - ALTA LOMA, we hereby establish in your favor our Irrevocable Authority to Pay t 294/SB- 86/20791 in the amount cf $124,000.00. This Irrevocable Authority to Pay is available against your sight drafts drawn on Golden State Sanwa Bank, Pasadena, Calif- ornia, and accompanied by your letter certifying that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is entitled under its agreement with Golden State Sanwa Bank, relating to PENNFIELD HONES -ALTA LOMA. Said certification shall be final and binding on the tight of the City of Rancho Cucamonga t, so draw. The amount available under this Irrevorable Authority to Pay 1 294/SB- 86/20791 will be reduced from time to time to the extent o pp� ayment of your drafts or upon your written authority drawn hereunder and upon your request, upon receiving from you a letter certifying the amount by which this Irrevocable Authority to Pay f294/SB- 86/20791 is to be reduced, and the amount that will be ava37STeTiereunder after such reduction. This Irrevocable Authority to Pay expires on December 1, 1987, in the t,rited States of America. We hereby undertake that your drafts when drawn under the terms and conditions of this Irrevocable Authority to Pay will be duly honored by us upon presentation. Please ensure that all drafts bear a reference to our Irrevocable Authority to Pay t 294/C13- 86/20781 Very truly yours, Golden State Sanwa Bank, a California Corporation ByL+.S: -��- EXHIBIT 'B' l7.�t I SUBDIVISION 6JARANTEE 40 PERrORmANCE (SCTIIRG Of FIN7 MONUMENTS) City CounNl City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box s07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 61710 Gentlenent Pursuant to Chapter /, Article 9, Se•tien e6497 of the Government Code. the undertlglltJ hereby agrees that all So ...... is she., an the final sap of n 11791 are to be set and furalth.d by Iva sub ivid ref eng .Meer Or Surveyor on or before je.jiq lag? , as spec Vled In the Engle i_.r urveyer I Wtificate an agrees to furnish the notes thereon to comole O ill engl •.erlAD reopireepnts specified In Section 66497, of the Government Code. The anderstgned hands you herewith ha suit of S 3,SSO.00 am a Cash depetl t. said deposit to guarantee t o a m.numen t :111 be 1!t i.d the notes furnished as Abewo provided on or before the date specified and that the engineer or Surveyor will be pa to by the undersigned It It further understood and agreed that In the event the undersigned falls to CC-lilt' the •bare rtgwlrements •fill, the time specified, the City of Rancho CUCamO,ga Is Authorized to Complete said re0ulrements Or Court them to be Completed and the cast thlreof is to bil a charge AgAl.lt said cash deposit, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is cutlmrtzed to sate the necessary transfer 1`101 said Cash depus:t to the credit for the prooer city fund. It 19 further agreed that if the o,derflgned does not A .... At evidence t0 the City Council that he has Paid the engtn.er Or Surveyor for the setting of the final monument%, and if the a" 1" or survel11 qI's ale nOtICM Prescribed In Section 66191 eI lie Cover n.en11 Coda, the Cll7 thall pay to told engineer Of Surveyor, the cash .!poll[ har I a A, if the cost of Completing Selo '94.1pements !needs the Amount OI the Cash deposit, the undersigned a9rets to PAY the difference madam thirty 10) days after receiving written Statement from the dif Cill Of Rancho Cucamonga Specifying the amyort of the dlfl.rence between lth. Camp deposit enq M occurs cost of said faqulr 2 LS IrEtDifTEID IWNC LTA A Joint Venture Cordial,;: ( by L!m Mana9 9 Vent , PLSLVPTIMD I)MLOPIAM. 1MC. a CAiitocni C rpo.p on � //. 'r � f.. / rA,, Sebdivlder BY, J,cS L. aoltam. Pr.,.u.At 170 w 17tt1 Street. Ste. leg. Couta ",a, CA 91627 Address The depoliter of record (for return of any portion of the Cash deposit) shall be damn, rat !cove (home) ear ROTE: TO It SGINITTED FULLY FILLED Our AND SIGNED l RESOLUTION NO 4ft=N=g&R- g(- — 'S.3 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.., CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 11793. WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 11793 consisting of 47 lots, submitted byPennfieldHomesy Alta Loma, a joint venture, Subdivider, der,locate on the east side of Amethyst, between Highland and Lemon Avenues, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution Dy said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon HOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows: ATTEST 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same Is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Sth day of March, 1986. AYES NOES: ABSENT or 0. Hike7—s7Wa—y5r CITY OF RANCHO CUCOION0A STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1986 .v TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engfr ering Technician SUBJECT: Approva. of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securit- for Tract 11932 located on the north side of Finch, between Bandoia and Haven submitted by C.T.K. Incorporated. Tract 11932 was approved by the Planning Commission on October 28, 1981, for the division of 2.72 acres into 10 lots in the Low Development District located on t" -orth side of Finch, between 8andola and Haven. The Oevel,...r, C.T. K. Incorporated, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $43.000 Labor and Material Bond: $21,500 Letters of approval have been received lrom the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. RECOMHEMDATI0;1 It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resoldtion approving Tract 11932, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. R�; ecifully trot ted, �LBH:L '• gl Attachments 7S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Pon To 11975 ..Oe and Re eledt*.to.e THESE It.......T• in the provisions of the SYbdivilie. Map Apt of the State of California, And 0/ ene &poll Dlf OrdlnlnGef of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Calif a lenl<tpat Corporation. by Cnd between Said City. AuNna/t� referred to a the City. And C T.[ Inc eve oDv nerelna er re erred to as the YITAESSETH INAT WHEREAS, said OevNODgr H11ref to develop certain real 110De rty an sold Cltt H then on the Conditionally approved subdivision ono•. H TA .19R ; and WHEREAS, %aid City has established certain requlremeeq t0 be vet 01 laid Developer as Dref ,001 t1[I t0 agOfn vas Or fiid Subalvi /101 glmerally I1CIted br'rHn eaMO a On tnl Mrtn Side of fineh NOW, THEREFORE It 14 hereby afraid by la 0 .Ity and by Said Oereloper of 10'lorl: 1. The O.vaoaer oere0e 9 ",, to construct At Ocvf lobs r't ea pe.to all i.1111Ieentl detV lbed on Page 6 hare• Of wl than t•Nre months repro ene a /eeNve ate nn..r f. Thlf aoree.ent Shalt be a / /ectlrt On tea date Of the resol utlan of the Council DI tad City aDOrpvinq trH ecreeal -t This sore....[ shat De In dNANt +n ene day /ollor• Inc toe /I rst . ..nave... l data aI tad t,pro,,l unit.. an oaten• Non D/ time has been granted Dy S 4 City .. nerelnatar Iloilo. ad 7. The Developer May request in extenslan of %too to COOPI'It@ ttl tells hereof such req.flt shall be submlttea t0 the Clt/ In •rlting not lass than DO dot bill" the llIlralmn Net* hereof, And shall Contain C Statement Of CtICOmltanea nagassltatinq the extension of tile. The city shot have the right to review the +,ONSlowS of this Cgream.nt, Including the Construction standard,• Cott atfeate. and bDrOReMt fV, And to requtrl aJVftment, thtreln if Shy substantial cneCagrlty occurred during the tare hereof a has the Iror'elontl If the hthissvI 9,oemg.t. falls he Cltl9s heel nave0enll right At amy teat to cause 1814 Provisions IS he sat by any lave Vl hens, and the reuPon rqC :,#. Irene the Developer end /or his surety the Iuli cost and I a nse Inclrred. each let of said Ddevelopre Shall + Provide ccordinee lr stn then regulation,. Schedule,, and lea of the Cucaaonga County Wall, District 6 Toe Developer shall be rty0onfible for replacement. relocatlor or removal 01 Any C0400nent Of any Irrigation roar pp.tem I1 con /llct 11th canftrut ton of requlre4 Improvements to shy sat /action 0I the Cltl EOei system near and tea dwmer of such water 3113 t• S erta 4nyon Rd. Suit Oftte EEo OIamM tae, u 91169 Tra Ott and COWIN. P.M. / 7' I I.orarestntf rtaulrld to be constructed shall confers to the Stdod"4 014wlnit and Stanurd Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement plan approved 09 end On file In the off: C• of the City Engineer Slid Improvements are tabulett0 On the COnetruCtlon and land Estimate, hereof Incorporated an pale 6 hereof, as taken Iron the lnproeeient VIA"% listed thereon by number The Developer shall Alto be responsible for COnttruC. t 10" Of any "east tionf Or Other Incidental murk beyond the tract boundaries As "Ceded tar Safety and proper surface drainage Errors Or ommksslome discovered during CoAttruCtin shall be Corrected upon the dlrtctlOn Of one City Enllhear Advised cork out to Said plan modification$ shaft be Covered by the provisions Of this Agreement and tec ... 4 by the surety Covering planned .arks the original atnlOptr6 from the officee of pthe Shift Engineer priori to tta,t the of pork; All vtgul4tlan$ listed th er..A shall be observed, with an Ant tan given to safety proceeuros, Control of dust n0110, or Other hug f ante t0 the area, and to proper notification Of public ulfittl0f And City Departments Failure to Comply with this section shell be Subject to toe PIAaltIGS pra•IJed therefor 9. The Dvloper Shall be responsible isr ..maul of all loose rock% and other debris free public r 9hts -Of -ray within or adjoining said development resulting from work relative to sold development 10 York done within *-filing %tracts Shall be diligently pursued to completion; the city shall have the right to Complete any And all wort fn end event of -"Justified delay In completion, and to ntovar alt colt and expense Incurred from the bev1J"Oar and /or hit Contractor by any lawful aunt 11 Said Developer shall at all flats following dedica- "On of the Strait$ and easements 1n said subedl•Islon. up t0 the COmpiulOn and IC<eptenCO of said work or laormv sent by as City Coof 1, girt good and adequate warnlna tm the traeelinyy public of ucn and every ungarOUt conOtttan e-Ibte vet to sa1A street or 0a %teen t, and .111 Protect the to ravel nq publlt Irom such detective or dangerous conditions Until the completion of alt Lprovuents, herein Incorporated on 1490 6 . to be performed, ucn of said Streets not aCCept@d of improvements shall be under the charge Of fAiQ Developer AIO COM4 OA say plot, all or a portion of any street subject to the COndili0i to ntalne0 In t temporary street Closure permit, Issued by the City Enq mee r, whenever It Is nemelsary to protect the Public during the construction of the Improvement$ Martin agreed to he made 12 Parkway treat required to be planted shalt be plant* ter the 0treloper liter Other Improvement cork, grading and Cleanup has bean Completed. Planting shad be done at Pr0•IQeO by Ordinance in aC Car don C. with the Plant lag diagram approved by ehe City Community Den lOpmut Olrectar The Developer Shall be responsible for maintaining all trees Plaited In 9000 health until the end 01 the guaranteed e4lhtua"Ce period. Or for One year after planting, whlthaver is I ster 17. The Developer Is responsible for meeting all foodi- t1Onf established by the City pursuant to the Subdivision .t. (77 and no I.pfmetmtht security provided herelnvlth shall be released !afore such acceptance unless Otherwise provided and authorised by the city rouncll of the City IA This agreteent shall not terminate until the maintenance quashes• security hereinafter described has been released by the City. or until a new agreement together with the required 1e0rov...At security has been submitted to the City by a successor to the harsin named, and by resolution of the City Council sass has been accepted, and this agreement and the Improvement security therefor has been released 15. The I.proveeeet security to be furnished by the DeeN opal with this agreement shall consist of the following and shall be 1n a fore acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful performance of this agreteent. 1. A bond or bonds by ant or sort duly authorized Corporate sureties In the fare and content specified by eovern.let Code Section 66499 1, 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the fare and Content specified by the City Attorney. 2. A deposit W1th the City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for securing deposits of public .o.las B. to secure laborers and .atarta Len: 1. A band or bonds by one or .are duly authorized corporate sureties in the for. and content sperlfled by COvtrnment code Section 66499 2 2. An Improvement Security Instrument in the form and content tpedtfled by the City Attorney. Y. A deposit With City of money or negotiable bends of the kind oppro.td for securing C. A cash deposit With the City to guarantee 0syment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the Final Nap for the sett tnq of all boundary, lot corner, and street cure 1.r Ins monuments and for furnish In centerline tee notes to the City. The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or sury eyar as acceptable payment in full; or. If no v Imes Is submitted, the cash Done In all be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained heroin Said Cash deposit may be refunded as soon as prece- durt permits After receipt by the City of the centerline tee notes and written assurance of pygeet in full flag the engineer or surveyor. 0 The required bands and the principal amounts thereof are set forth CA pegs 6 Of this agreement 16. The Developer warrants that the Improvements described In this agreteent shall be flat from Walt$ In materials and Workmanship Any and all portions of the improve- ments found to be defective within one (1) Year following the data on which the improvements are accepted by tha CItY shalt be repaired or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the city The Developer shall furnish a maintenance guarantee security In 4 sun 44111 to stn percent (105) Of the construction estllsta or S200 00 wniche ver Is greater, to secure the faithful performance of Deva1Ope"S obllgatiOnt as describe: In this para. gqraph. The maintenance guarantee security shall alto secure the /al Vrul performance by the Developer of anY obligation of the Developer to do specified w0 rk .Ith - '$pact to any parkway _5. r 2O !%limits or 3200.00, -life never Is gloater, to seem's the faithful prfornl- t of Oneloptr's obi lgAllen% as described In this Para. 9atOh Tom as' "ten &nee 9YAr1-tea I 'Cur Ity shell aISO secure the at Tom P4'fo'01.Ca by the Otmeloper Of any obligation Of the •mintenance asstssment-ldls:rtrt rA Oncth they loprov1-lntt �AVSrbf been SCCepttd and a mtlnttnancs gma'Sntee Security has been ave been y the Cltl •At Other Ia Prooe -tIt SOCYrlty described 1n this dgrelrtnt may be a 114sed Proelded that such eel eats fs rth rs1se ar t her lied b, the Subdivision map Act and Any aPPllcabft City Jrdinnee 12. That the Oe,21oper shall take Out and malntafn such Public liability and property d1-aga Ins.' &nee &s .hall his and any contractor or Subcontractor Protect fornlnq c by this a Performing Protect 9'<eatnt Iron clalst for property 421-19011 -Rich say atlas DeCtvR a/ the natu" of the mark or from operations under that age!Ment. vhother such op 'atlons be by hlatelf Or by any o MPIO /ad by Or %Aidu Persons ever 01 though such though be nos lCauaed by the n091igtnce of the 0tveloptr or any contractor or Subcontractor or anyone smalls's by said streams The public add Property and property deals& InlYranCO Shan 'lit the City a% adds tonal Insured and directly PrO tact the City. It% officers, .silts and eapldl'tes, as .011 of the Developer. Att contractors and IS: subcontractors, and all Insurance policies Issued hvt1nder hall to state The 01-10-0 amounts of such insurancm shall Ds 111 all lost: A. Contractor's liability Insuranct providing bodily t-gury or death liability lialts of not less the 3]00,000 for each person and 111, 000,000 for each accident or oceurrenct, old prop. rty damage liabil- ity Ian is of not last than 3100,000 for each &CC%. dent or occurrence .Ith an aggregate limit of 3230,000 for Clain rhfOh may arise from the opera- tions of tha Oere100e1 14 the performance of the tor' herein providtd D. AYtonoblla liability inlurence covering all vehicles used In the Derformanct of this agreement prooldtng bodily injury liability hulls of not lest than 32006000 for each person and $700,000 or each Accident or occurrence, and pro Pe. ty damage liability IWts of not leas than $30.000 for each accident or occurrence, .1th in aggre9.tt of apt less than $100,000 rhich may arise from the opera. tlont Of the 011e1oper or his Contractor In Derfaratnq the mart provided for hertln Is. shall That (llt lith then City P At certificate orq certificates of Insurance Covering the Specified Insurance Each Such certificate shall boar an endorsement preciuEach the cancellations, 01 reduct/pn t coverage of any policy evidence. by Such cerlificate, befors the expiration of thlrtl (]O) eay11 ally the Cltl shall hart received notification by registered mall from the Insurance carrier. As evidence of Ynderttsndlag the prorlifons coot alned Rent-, and of Intent to county mtth Same. the Sub di der h1- d erein, the f`311001119 ture described IaOeoremant Security, and has affixed his Signature hereto: -a. /7'7 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type: Faithful Performance Pf1n01pA1 AmOUht: S4y.000 Mama and address of surety: IMSURA'ICE COMPANY Of THE VEST. P.O. Bon ZOV. MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Tustin. CA. 92680 type: Labor and Material Principal Amount: S2I.SOO 8404 and address of surety: INSMICE COVAIT OF THE VEST. P.O. got 2079 CASH DEPOSIT MOMUMENTATION Tustin. Co. 92680 Types Principal Amount: S J00 Nut sad address of sar4ly: NAIATEMANCE GUARANTEE Type: FrancaPal Amount: N/A Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE Cttl IN WITNESS HEREOF. the 081tlet h1et0 hart _mused these presents to be duly otocuted and actno.ledgad mlth all formalltidf required by In- On the date% tit forth opposite their signatures 0.T.1. INC. Oltt%-J!:4...1 /214Ja Aye +a.r'•if .onttoper g hat ure r ntap CORO0R11T! ♦CKMOWLlOOMCMT Sul. an ft lFM%lA ca,..lra LOS ANGELES 11F ss b N-.. _12.Uxww Fanmi : t$- S& "I"in.. Barbara J. Patton m..M.r W Fn•a H error Pvo.0 aa.ra.n. •awr" Apt T. ADBaINt. +a. '6 w.senmv• ..rm• O om..a r. m.w www aswUr%mn •.muN. m "mN��en�nou.cvl•dm.wm. m•mw.nl n —wwwra m.e0mrmmn mr". nm.4n1, rO.Uw.bgp.d to nf• WI W lrFtlYl.n •.•d1M a W RN 92t m/..M Ntl ark1Y •.LL 1 MNmY .N9n•:W.: � DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED •S. /g6 L 1II W IW4111 LULVWOA ENGINEERING DIVISION ENCAOMMENE FEANIT FEE SCIIEDOLE NOTE: Wet Not include Current Fee for writing partsit W Per t deposits OUAnTiTT BRIT [SIN PRICE rMOUNT L.F P.C.C. curb - 12• C.F. 23• gutter 7.2$ 1 L.F. L.F. P.C.C. cure - 8• C.F. N• gutty 6,00 a n non P.C.0 curb only S.SO m L.F. S.F. A.C. berm 3• P.C.C. sidewalk 3.SO 1.75 _ - ' S.F. Drive aPprmth 2.50 -..tL� S.F. C.T. 8• P.C.C. cross gutter (Inc, curb) Street excavation ].a0 Me, 11, C.T. Iparted eabankmnt 3.91 1.50 �7��� iu 1-- S.F. Preparation of Subiredo r•a= S.F. Cmshtd 899. base {per inch thick) 0 O] 2,11Z so TOY TOY A.C. over 1300 tans) g7.0p 1 TOY A.C. 9W to 1300 tons) JS.00 TON A.C. S00 to 900 loot) 35.00 I,.T7 S.F. A.C. A.C. under SCO tons) 3• thick) 65,00 _- S.F. Patch A.C. (trm 0.55 L75 S.F EA. 1• thick A.C. aver ay AdJust 0.- EA. sewer o+nhole to grade Adlust 250.00 EA. sew" Olean Out to grade 150.00 FA. Ad)ust water alveS to grade 75,00 �Z. L.P. Street lights Barr lades (Intersec. $500 sin) I0pC.00 . 1.00 2.a`D.oO L.F. 2 x 3• redwood header 1.75 S.F L.F. AM161 of A.C. Daveeant RMY&I of P.C.C. Curb 0.35 n•, L.F. Remral of A.C. berm 3.30 1.00 EA. U. Street signs Reflectors and posts 200.- L.F. Concrete block wall 35.00 25.00 S.F. Retaining will 20.00 Cal. Aggregate base 2.00 - �- tunes 3i5•00 L.F. 18• REP 2050 0 'RCP St500 29.00 1.77 i. au L.F. 23` 0 35.00 L.F. L.F. 36• RCP 38• RCP ((2000 0 1200 0 39.0 EA. Catch basin W • 3, 76.00 2000'00 EA. Catch basin W • 8' 2900.00 EA. EA. Catch basin W w 22• 3500.00 EA, Local depression P Local depression 12, 500.00 EA. JU1141lan structure 1000.00 5000.00 •-_ EA. Outlet structure, Std 0506 1s00.00 EA. Outlet structure Std #507 -T L.S. a[NOYF EXISTING B 25.00 IlDGE $00.00 L.F. Guard panel (wmR ) 1 p' L.F. S"Cut 25.00 EA. Headwall (38• wing) Z.00 1 L.F Redwood head" 000.00 S.F Landscapingy L irrigation 1.75 L.F Roll curb 1P.C.CC.) 2.75 T FA. IMenldanllkk 7.50 -�• 23 EA. Street Ttte 1 O00 00 7j.00 .OD IIGII.EERING IRSPECTIOY FEE I D60 00 SUB 70Tq RFSiDearlOWDELIREATI08 CASH (OryTIRGENCI COSTS 5 36,54 3.T7 DEPOSIT (REFUnDAVIE -L'� m (1 Y3 Ot"11TATION SURETY (CASH) fAITNFVL P(AfOUWq( 80.70 - 1+I.AD /aQD� tAeOR AND NAILRIAL 60N0 (50%) t erardim Co my Code +Titles, Ch+ Chapters ID +I Code, Title I, Chapter 1.08, adopting San y + cash restoration7dellneat lON de r._ s Dade Drl" to Issuance of an Enaineerino rmrt -.,.. e.-,. Doslt snail SGIDIVISION GUARANTEE 40 PERFORMANCE (SETTING Of FINAL MONUMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucaaanga P O Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca Ifornla 91710 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Cope, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shorn an the final MAD of To 11912 are to be set and furnished by • {u00 V er { englnnfr Of surveyor On Or bt Pore ,$ as specified In the [nq lneei s or urv.. s art ca a an •greet t0 furnish the Notes thereon to ca m. let, all engineering requlreaemts specified In Sec ,son 6H 91, of the gore nmant [ode The sadersigned hands oou herewith the sum of S 1,760 00 a3 a caem deposit, ,a•d deposit to qY Van N• t K tna monusem s •111 ba set and the mat's furnlemed as above Provided on or tsfere the date specified and that he engineer or surveyor mill be Da td by the undersigned It It further understood and agreed that In the a ... t the undersigned fall, to complete the above requirements vIthln the tie spgclf+ed, the C ty of Rancho Cucamonga Is authorized to comb l4:e said requirements or cause them to be completes and the Cost thereof Is to be A charge a9alnst said Cash deposit, And the Cty Of Rancho Cucamonga Is authorized to mate ins notes ary transftr from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper City fend It is further agrees that It the undersigned does not present 4" den ca to tin Citr Council that he has Paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting Of the final monuments, and If the 48 1 car or surveyor 91... the not -C,, prescribed In Section 66097 of the government Code, the Cly shall py to said engineer or surveyor, one Cash deposit herein mad4 If the cost of Completing sold requirements e{cfeds the amount of the Cash d4OOst e, the undersigned agrees to Day the difference u lthin Chivy 1161 days after receiving rritten statement frog the Clty of Ranc'a Cu camp.;• sDC<1 y1n9 the emaunt Of the d+rf trance bttueen the ca {n dapaslt had the .ctuel cote 0/ red redo l regents Cordially. Sabdlvlsar 6 J Address 1771 Cn, 6r r. Carron Rd. r` It! OI.w+.a sir. CA ones The depositor Of record •(for return of any portion of the Cash deposit) shall be r i.[�ItC. ) Ill 0. Arr. amen 04. q1.2 OJAW F CA 01765 (11.me Or eH NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY Ili OUT AND SIGNED l8v CITY OF 2AXCItO CUCAMONOA INFIOTENENT AGREEMENT FOR in 11952 KNOW All MEN of THESE PRISMS: That this agreement is eo do and #.loved Into, In G41FO104n Ce ..in the pro111IGAe of tee Su bdlvlslo" Map Act of the State of Cellfornla. And of the oppllCable Ordsnances of the city Of Rancho Cueaepnga, he's,.fvela, A aunitlpal COremratl0n, NT and between Sold City, heralma it nfa••to to as the Clty, and C. i.[ Inc. erem p ar hHelna or re a -re0 l0 O t e YITMESSETH THAT, WHEREAS. sold Develop ar doll Is tr. dev0iap certain ro as "rope rty In told CIt( as shown On the cO mdltlonAlly approved to pule Islam anon at Tit 11972 ; and WHEREAS, told City nos established certain requirement] to be alt by said Developer as pro requ, Iwo AVpt4 ll et 'Aid subdivision generally located bebnn 6onee a m one nerte ide of rinch _ 101, TNEIEFOtE, It 11 Mersay .9.110 by Said City and by tale Deve lo... as Ip1 0.t: 1 Tee all 1. per berebl agrees to construct at Ouelopo r•f uptme All bSlav,Santa 0esprnbed on page 6 hen. Of Yltbin heir, so At NS frost the orfattlla date hereof 2 This agreement shall be effective On the date Of the resolution of toe Council Of Said City aCpi,w nq this agreemant This agreement shall De In default on the day follow. 1.9 the first anniversary date o1 said approval unless an eaten. slam of ties has bun glinted by said City as hereinafter provid- .a corplale the term, ehereo /r aSuc h�qrequest o l eaten%. f of time to the City In writing not last than JO lays be*Ore the aspiration /ail banal, and shall con taln A statement of OlrtumttanceS no utf'tatlnq the tatenslon o1 it.. The City shalt have the right to 101100 the provisions of this .9....ent, Inclueing the Cohtlr u Clio- Standards . Cost estimate. and 111roles ant eeCYrlty, an/ to requtrt Adlustments therein If any tubstantl al change hes act mewed during the term hereof. t. If the 00re1oper falls ar neglects to Comply with the provisions of this 49- efaent, the Cl., shell halt the fly ht at any time to cause Said provisions to be act by any lawful meant• and thtnup0+ riwver Ives one Oe velour an / /or his surety the tali rote and upa 0 Inca rr e/ S. The Developer shall provlde assured star sere/, t0 tot o+ said development In accordance vita the ea raga lAtiOns. ichceh dales and fete of the Cu mania COYnty Water District 6 The Developer small of le.pontible for repeat emaat, relocation, or removal of any component Of any Ir- Igation Water system In Conflict with construction of require/ •aproltae "tt to the satisfaction of the City Englnter System, an! Sae owner of such a 3331 r 1. 5. area Canyon ltd. suite 220 Ol asond da-. G 91765 Tracts and comet /Inl. F.M. /F3 I Ima roY• •net 111V n0 t0 be constructed chill culture to the Stand", Oraringt and Standard specification$ of the CI 1), and to the Ia'D-0111t plan dooroved by and oa file in the Ce of the city Engineer Snd bpf0reeenq are tabulated on the ConttfuCtion and Bond ESt4att, hereby Incorporated en D+qe 6 levant, AS liken fr0a to lapravte fns plant IlStfd thereon 0) number The 00-01*per that] Ufa be 1110onSible for construc• tlo" Of say t...ntIOA% or Olhe• ""'dental Rule beyond the t..st baundirltS as needed for safety and proper fuflAtt drainage, Error% 01 00011119"s dltco-0•t0 daring rons HuCln %hall be Corr Rte' uPOI tee direction of the City Engl.etr Bev tad are it.a to [Aid OIAa .Odifica4lans fhA11 be CO-*'@' by the provisions OI thlf age Retnt and see., ed by the Surety covering the original plans' wort) B Canstruulon permits shin be abtalned by the Dart ppfr from the office Of the City Engineer prior to it,,, Of .orkt all rtqulatlana listed shoran" shall be *bfenld, with attention given to safety or...aurek• Contra) 01 ems e, robe. or other null once to the area, ;no to proper notlflCatlOn cf pwblIc a l ll t let and City 0tpt rimer's Fall.,@ to Canply .1th this sectloA shall bt' Subject to the penaltles provided therefor all IO'S1 gfoct Sn'Ade'in*, 4abrts 7!101 p.bllt Sr bIghtS.0/ .ly ."thin or ad1.Ining fold development 10SUltin2 f Om .Olt rtlatfvt to $olo development di Ugtntl�O pursued% to compittlom n is* 'St ? st"I1tits %hilriq by to complete any and all work in the event of unl ustlflea delay In c:4 COaDlf lion, and to recover al colt and tapinSl Incurred from la lion. end /Or his contract, of by 'ny Iaw /.l .11ne 11 Sala 0e1009e1 shill at all times f*liawinq Beal u• Stan of the Streets and taSe.e.Lt In Said lubldlv1110., uD ep ca toe01et'on and 'eceptance of slid work o1 f.provemtnt or said City Council, ghe good Inc adequate rainl,g to the trave Public of each end Ivory dangerous condition falstt.t In laid Street nr aliement, and will *,otect the traveling public Isom duce olytc t, It or dangerous conditions Vasil the co.pit•lon of all lapruvt.ents, herein incorporated on Page 6 , to be peffaf.ed, each of said streets not accepted of fmp.Oveeents tall be under the charge of •1d 0 ... loot. Said Developer .q close all or a portion or any street Subject to the conditions conttgfned In a te.parary street closure permit, Issued byAthe durtngE then construct salvo% It Ives laprortaenit to hirole Protect �E to De ads ty partner [lets requl,.a to be planted %hall be Planted by ilia 001*1002, after other Improvement wart, gradtig I'd C11'nup has been Sosple eta planting %"all be done as pre •IdeO by Ordinance in .,Cc,0ann Ytth the planting diagram approved by the City Come.nit, 01Yelo D. ant Dlrectof The Dlv*IOPer shall be '1100'siblt for maintaining all trial all tel In good health until the end of the qua-weed laterenanct Oer�od, or for one year t /ter Pl.ntmg, Wchever Is Ij. The OlreloDer Is respOnft"le for meetllq All ccndl. t10ns est&Dili had by the City Pursuant to the Subdivision -q- rZftaftow. / ?fz and no ie0rmvement security Provided herelmrlth skill be released before even acceptance unless otherwise provided and authorited by tea City Council of the city le This agreement shall not terminate until the uietenanee guarantee security hereinafter described has been released by the City. or until a new a9ret•ent together with the required Improvement Security has been Submitted to the City by a Sutcostor to the herein named, and by resolution of the City Council site has been accepted• and this agreement and the Improvement Security therefor has teen released is The Impro ve•ent Security to be furnished by the Pere 109ar with this ogre went (hall consist of the following and 'hall be In a farm acceptable by the City Attorney: A. To secure faithful p*,fmrmanee of this agreement 1 A bend ar bonds by cat or more duly authm•Ited corporate sweet l as I the form and content specified by Governmeet Code Section 66199 1 2 An Ieore.ement Security Instrument In the form and content Specified by the City Attorney. S A dooms 11 "1 in the City of money or negotiable bands of the kind approved for securing deposits Of Public mumps B. To secure labor*,- and rwter,eLen: I A bond or bonds by one or more duly authorited corporate sureties in the form and content specified by Government Cole Section 66199 2 2 An Improvement Security Instrument In the form end content specified by the City Attorney. S A deposit with City of money or negotiable bonds of the kind approved for swearing C A cash deposit with the City to guarantee payment by the Developer to the engineer or surveyor whose certificate appears upon the fine, Map for the felt Iny of all boundary, lot corner, and street Centerline monuments and for furnishing centerline tie notes to the City The amount of the deposit may be any amount certified by the engineer or sure yor at acceptable payment In full; or, 1/ no value 1f Submitted, tnp Cash bond shall be as shown on the Construction and Bond Estimate contained herein Said Cash deposit maY be refunded at soon as proce- dure permit I after receipt by the City or the Canterllne tie notes and written Assurance of Payment In full from the engineer Or surveyor. D The required ban sand ina principal am...is thereof are set forth on page 6 of this agreement. 16. The Oneloper warrants that the Improvement' described In this agreement shall be free from defects 1n materials and workmanship. Any and all portions of the improve. ments found to ba defective within one (1) year fotlowln9 the data en which the f.0,07setts are accepted by the City Shall be rfoatred or replaced by Developer free of all charges to the City The Developer shall furnish A maintenance guarantee security in a sum equal to ten percert (I0S) of the construction It,. to or 1110.00, whichever it greater, to Secure the faithful perfermamcf of Developer's obligat ll one it described In this DATA. aatph. The •alatenanct guarantee security shall also secure the /Al the Yl Df rfareance by the Developer of any obligation Of the DesaioPer to do specified work with respect to any parkway _S. estbate or S700.00, whicne,er Is greater, to Secure the faithful D erformamte of Oevocoor s cbll9atlan% as deStrlbsd In this part. I reph The maintenance guarantee te:urttr S,.,Il •ISO secure the althful perforance Or the 0eveloper of any obligation of the Developer to do spulfled wart w,tk respect to any partway m Alnlanen<• AStCSS.amt district Once the Improvement% nova been accepted Ann A mainttnarCI glarintle Security by been accepted by the City, the other Improventnt security described In this agreement may bt rtlta$ed 0- 0.1060 that Such rtlelsr is Otherwise autharited Of a Subdivision Nap Act and any applicable City 0rni nano 17. That the Devalaol, shall take Cut and oti.taln such Dubuc liability And property damage Ift SPrAmtt al shall protect him and my mitre CtOr Cr S.DCOmtraetor Performing Mort Covered by this agreement fro* claim, for property damage% which may lr1Se because of the nature of the wort or /rpm Operations undo, this agreement, ehethar such optrat Ins be by himself or by any Contractor or subcontractor, Or Anyone directly or Indirectly employed by said persons, even though Such daugts be not caused by the negligence of the Oavtleper or any contractor or subcontractor or anyone employed bf %III persons The public liability and property damage Insurance shall list the City is adlltanal Insured and directly Protect the City. Its Officers, agents and tealoyets, as well as t,e Developer his contractors and his subcontractors, and all Insurance Policies Issued hereunder shall %a state The minitum Amount, of such Insurance shall be as follows: Contractor s liability Insurance providing bodily lolury or dla t Ilabll -ty limit, of mot lei$ the 5700,000 for each Person and $1,000,000 for each accide.. or occurrence, and property damage liab11- Ity Itm^ts of mat lets then 3 IoO,C00 tar tech meet. dent or occurrence with an 099.19ate limit of $750,000 for claims which mar erase 'rem the opera. Slant of the Detel00er In the performance of the .art termin provided Automobile liability fnluranCe covering all vehicles used in the Perform L"Ce of this agreement Providing bodily '"Jury 11111ttty limits of not last thin %700,000 row each Vernon and S30D,000 for each accident or occurrence, and Property damage liability halt$ of rat less than SS0,000 far each accident or occurrence, wit- an aggregate of not it" than 6100,000 which may a It from the Opera. dons of the OevelaDer or his Contractor In Performing the wort provided far herefa is That before the eaecutiae of ills agreement, the Developer &hail file with the City a certificate or certificates of Insurance covering the specified Insurance Each such certificate $hall bear on e,dorseremt P,00 -1149 the cancellations, or feduettom In coverage of any policy ,4dencss br such certificate, before the e.plretfon of thirty (30) days At Ior the City shalt have received notlfiCatlo, by registered Sell fra. the Insurance carrier As evidence of understanding the Pravtal"S contained herein, and of Intent to -amply wlth same, the Subdivider has submitted the following described Irprovement security, and hat affil d hit S Ignature hereto: M—i.ftow. /?4 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Type] Faithful Perfommnce Principal Amount $42.000 Name and address of surety: INSURAICE CCNPA.MY Of THE VEST. P 0. Bo. 2D2y. MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Tustin ra. 92680 Type: Labor and Material PrinCloal Amount: 521.500 Name and address of surety: INSUPAHCE COVANY Of THE VEST, P.O. Do. 2029 CASH DEPOSIT MONUME4IATI09 Tustin' Ca. 97650 Type principal Amount: $1.700 Name and address of surety MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE Type: Principal Amount: N/A Nine and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY IN WITNESS HEREOF. the parties hereto hire tauted that& Presents to be duly Firm Alines required by ...tutee and ac4n9wledged with all law an the dates tot forth signatures opposite their C.T.t..' Oatft /7. Afr /INC. �/i by..✓' K.. .Developer gma[un .too CORPORATN ACMNOWLBOOMNNT sm..t ru"Act'. a•m O.tals" M29"Ot _Etn^i• ^y taub.i9r.nm, u Coma +' L05 ANGELES Barbara J. Patton tM WP.bMe NalN prowl PNMWI Kee-" Glt T. 8099INS, yq. Pw.an"k .n.raw O M9rw row. miin. onN ml uu.Nrtprwamc. \ .w ��Or bMT YX 111 LnO...GYI.O N..�MnMNIVINnt.l �_Ormo.nW .ltM CpfM.mtlniMn.'. amM.M.CWwNO(.e to MlNllM [ppwmq.t.etul.o ll WfIN[SN int Mne ane olntW .W l M NOlmr f q.w 0EYELOPER'S sIGRATURE MUST BE NOTARIZED -S- �� 7 l ror 1 Date: File J ut. L. ...WU LWM" thGIYEERIAG OITISIGI EACRO.Yd21ERT PERIM FEE SCHEME ROTE: Does Vast Irclude current fee for writing permit or parmelt deposits YIMUTT L.1 IT ITEM PRICE AY00Af L.F. P.C.C. curb . 12• C.F. P• gutter 7.25 •• .j. UP P.C.0 curb . 0' C.F, 24• gutter 5.00 L.F. P.C.C. curb only 5.50 . e qq, m L.F. A.C. hers 4.50 - SJ 41 P.C.C. sld"ift, 1.75 S.F. Drive approach 2.50 iq S.F. C.T. B• P.C.C. cross Sutter (Inc. curb) 3.40 �ro,ed Street excavation 1.50 C.T. Imported embankment 1.S0 I). U S.F. Preparation of mbgrade 0.IS la•i_a S.F Crushed egg, bate (per Inch thick) 0.03 TOY A.C. Crer 1]00 tons) 27,06 Ado. TOY A.C. 900 to 1300 tons) 3500 - �- Tot A.C. $00 to goo tans) 45:00 Tol A.C. ender SOD ton%) 60.00 15,`1 S,F S.F. A.C. (3• thick) 0.55 m•s` - __ Patch A.C. (trench 1.75 S.F. I• thick A.C. overlay 0.30 U. Adjust sewer manhole to grade 250.00 EA. Adjust fewer clean Cut to grade 150.00 _ U. Adjust Ater valves to grade ISM �2 LA F. lights Barricades(inlersec. SS00 sin) 100j,00 6 6 � W L.F 2 a 41 reflood header 1.75 S.F. Ow,al of A.C. pavement 0.35 L.F RewAl of P.C.C. curb 3.30 +Ts L.F. Removal of A.C. bem 1.00 •�-� EA. Street signs 266.00 U. Reflectors and posts 35.00 -ice UP Concrete block w.11 25.00 S.F. Retaining wall 2.00 •-� T0Y Aggregate base 7.00 C.T. Concrete stv 2tures 125.00 L.F. 30• RCP 2000 0 29.00 L77i,e9 L.F. 24• RCP IS00 0 35.00 L.F UP. 36• RCP 2000 0 40• RCP 1200 0 76.00 EA. Catty basin W . 4' 2000.00 U. Catch basin W . 0' 2900 0o _ EA. Catch basin W . 22' 1500.00 EA Local depression 4' S00 00 U. Loc.l depression 12' 1600 00 EA. 3unetlon structure EA. Outlet structure, Std /505 1,,00 00 _T EA. Outlet air"turo, sea #507 500.03 L.I REMIT EIISTIAG BRIDGE Guard panel (wood) I000.00 T.6SS7n7" ii- L.r 25.03 EA. 11 a.All (48- wing) 46000 L.f RNwcod header 1.75 S.F Undsapin 6 Irrigation 2.75 T A Roll curer � - :) 7.50 a REStGEAIRG IASPEETI" FEE 2.060.00 SUB 70TH. 36.513.Tg RE516Rxr (RfrtLIr,FAT10A CA 511 :_mn m COnITII1GUCT COSTS f1;:7 ��41� �� DEPOSIT (REfle1RAeLEl rAIT11FUL PEIIfODWICE 0090 (1005) -,T'.tli O�txT OYOYEOIATIOA SM[TT EAWI) 1.7070.00 LAM ADO MATERIAL BM (SOf) t f^�` Pursuant to City of Rantho Cucononga uniclpsl Code, Title T. Chapter 1.00, Adopting Sm 1_'� srmde 1priorr to issuance of %NC[nglneceirm, Conitn iiMOeaMi ion /dU lnatla deposit shall SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE MO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUME41S) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P 0 Sao ROT Rancho Cucamonga, California 91750 Gentlemen: Pprs..nt to Chaster 7, Article 9, Section 66491 of the Government Code, the undersigned hereby Agrees that all monuments shown on the final map of R 11977 are ypto and furnithed by t e fY V fI s anglneer p turrr be s<mr baf off AS SPeelfled In the [ngineeT's or canllor s art, Cate 4n 4 agrees to furnish the Rates thereon to complete all engineering require... is specified In Section 56497, of the Government Code The undersigned bonds you herewith the tun of 1 .700 DO As a Cast deposit, said deposit to guarantee t at t • monumah s will be set and the notes furnitMd as above provided on 0r bee the the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor will be Paid by the undersigned It Is further understood and agreed that In the event the can der219ned fall, to Cobol eta the above requirements within the the specified, the City of Rancho Cucucn9a It Authorized to Complete said reavireoentt or Cause into to be Completed and the cost thereof It to be a Cba,ge against Sala Cash deposit, and the City o/ Rancho .......9a is authorized to mote I" necessary translar 11o6 said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It Is further agreed that if the un411119ned dome not pr esant er lathes to the City Council that no has paid the engineer 0, sort Far for the setting of the final monuments, and If the on Inner or su"t gives the noticat prescribed In Sect ian 66197 01 the Gogrmeeat Code, tM City shall pay to said engin..r or surveyor, the Cash deposit herein 0 a if the Cott of COMPItt.ng said requirements exceeds the amount of the Cash deposit, the underl.gnid agrees to pay the difference wlin in thirty (70) days after receiving wvltten statement from the City of Rancho Cuts 0 page specifying t.. Amount of the diqu Vent• between the Ca+h deposit and the actual Cost of said re 0u l remelts Cordially, p , Subdivider / Address 511. <- Pre. Oman 14. Sir z! 0 .vend Mr. CA 91765 Date The depositor or record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall be C T�yivC��]]ll 90. Brrn Gn+nn !d. Ct! Ia.+n s t76S 14ma d6rass NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED 1" RESOLUTION 110. e*"09"" $G — S / A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT 110. 11932. WHEREAS, the Tentative Hap of Tract No 11932, consisting of 10 lots, submitted by C.T.K. Incorporated, Subdivider, located on the north side of F,nch, between Bandola and Haven has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider and approved by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cit, of Rancho Cucamonga, California, as follows 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk Is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this Sth day of March, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Beverly A. Aathe et, City Clerk Jon O. Mike s, Mayor �v I My W'- n, vnnn n STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion P.M. 7349 - located on Hyssop at I -15 DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Release: 1977 Faithful Performance Bond (Landscape 8 St. Lights) $25.000.00 The required landscaping and street tights have been installed and it is recommended that Council accept said Improvements and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $25,000.00. P.M. 8280 - located on the southeast corner of Hellman and Arrow DEVELOPER: InterMetro Industries Corp. P.O. Box 747 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $9.615.00 The one year maintenance period for ,reel Map 8280 has been cempleted and the Improvements are acceptable. It is recommended that Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $9,615 00 Respectfully Subri led. VW LRH:bc / R/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAiMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March S. 1966 TO City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Turning Mamsaang, Engineering Aide c 1 r o 8 Z u � > nn I SUBJECT: Approval of Professional Services Agreement with C.I.A. Engineering Consultants `or Slurry Sealing and Heater -Remix Paving of Various Residential Streets, FY 85 -86, Phase II A proposal for the subject Professional Services Agreement was received from °.I.A. En3ineering Consultants for slurry sealing and heater - remixing various residential streets within the City. Some parts of the proposed streets to be slurry sealed have minor cracking in the pavement, and delay in applying a slurry seal may cause costly overlay or reconstruction. Some parts, due to age, already have major cracking to the pavement; heater -remix is highly recommended to achieve and enhance the longevity of the life of the pavement. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council award the Professional Services Agreement for slurry sealing and heater - remixing of various residential streets within the City to C.I.A. Engineering Consultants. It is also being recommended to authorize execution of the contract amount of $4,915.00 plus 10 percent for contingercies to be funded oy SB 300. Respe�tfull u filed, (Y ;fu �J�� LOH: nd Attachment �7 2 4 ••l LEGEND SLURRY SEAL D HEATER /REMIX CITY OF RANCHO CUCAUONGA LOCAL STREETS, SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM E5-86 193 N i 3I r _ TITLE C as .. i a. • jr It! Z O Qr >6 75 Pis \as „�u >aL+•,n v�..ra sI)�h Is nll rr- o 1%.en sVir • v a y � � � YV ♦al.�y * Ia Q �I as �� r• n e • f al .• . 1• I 7 p � � Y : �a C s Y�Y 111, djr1.L1 VL i L�/a tlCI r fI - Lpn•w -• !l M •.SY•..I..n 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAUONGA LOCAL STREETS, SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM E5-86 193 N i 3I r _ TITLE C LEGEND SLURRY SEAL HEATER /REMIX Cl T OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LOCAL STREETS A SLURRY SEAL PROGFAM T T 85-86 / l� TITLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into rhis day of , 19_, between the City of Ranclo Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "CITY') and Z.I.A. Engineering (hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT.). Consultants A. Recitals. (1) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal pert.ining to the performance of professional services with respect to the preparation of contract documents for slurry sealing and heater - — _remix paving of various residential streets - FY 85 -86 Phase II (`Project" hereafter). (11) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance of such services. (Iii) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY. CITY's Planning Commission, City Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NON, THEREFORE, it Is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. 1. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to the following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise requires: 7/31/85 -1- (a) Project: The preparation of contract documents for slurry sealing and heater -remix pavinr< of various residential streets - FY 85 -86, Phase II described in Exnibit 'A' Scope of Services hereto including, but not limited to, the preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional services as are necessary to be perforcxd by CONSULWAT in order to complete the project. (c) Completion of Protect: The date of completion of all phases of the project. Including any and all procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documeits, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the project acceptance for construction is set forth in Exhibit 48' Project Schedule attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and complete the project in accordan, with Exhibit 'A and applicable with Federal, State and CITY statUts, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, all to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. (b) COSSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collectively referred to as 'doc=ents') including all supplemental technical documents, as described in Exhibit W to CITY within the time specified in Project Scheduled, Exhibit -2- / Ff. "B ". Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit "A ". CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT commdnts regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in such farm and In the quantities drtermined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 82.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as nay, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT fu-ther agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sun of $4,915.00 for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sun shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in E..h'bit 'k. (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit "C" either with respect to hourly rates or lump sun amounts for individual tasks. In no -3- /4% event, however, will said invoices exceed 95: of ind'vidua' task totals described in Exhibits -A- (c) CONSULTANT agrees th,it, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sun in excess of 95: of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, togather with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in fora and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later rian 60 lays alter presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by C.Y. (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, to writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit 'A` hernof, shall be paid an a reimbursement basis In accordance with the fee sch,!dule set forth in Exhibit 'C% Charges for rdditional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth In Exhibit •A" hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of naps and other information, if available, which CONSULTAIIT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such lnfomaticn as is generally available from CITY files applicable to the prcject. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information frMm other governmental agencies and /or private parties. However, it Shall b? COUSUJANT's responsibility to make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such information. —4' le 5. Ownersinio of Oocu^ents: All dxuments, data, St.idies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photogra� ; and reports prepared by CONSULTANT purcuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CiV and, upon payment for services performed by CONSLLTANT, such documents and other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifica.'ans by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written °Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at lest fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified `n said Notice. In the event th's Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CO3SULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit 'C ", on a pro - rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of ter- ination In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (a), above CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all dncuments, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, Photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by -S- 19-7 CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate this Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Representatives: Any and all notices, demands, fnvoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The telow named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Blane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Encineer for and on behalf of the CITY and Hotch Bedrosian for and on behalf CONSULTANTS C.I.A. En Sneering Consultants, 9581 Business Center D�f ve. Suite "0" Rancho Cucamonga CA 9)730 Any such notices, demands, invoices and written connunicatio:c. L) mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. S. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither tomnence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the tern of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: (a) Worker's Comoensaton Insurance: Before beginning work, CON: ULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensaton , -ante for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors In carrying out the work specified Herein, in accordance with the laws of •de State of California. -6- �Od In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: •I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance to accordance with the provisions of that Code, and i will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement'. (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cast and expense. CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against ^laims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage ar sing from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of at least One M1' +ion Dollars (S1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars (51,000,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ("malpractice*) providing protection of at least N/A for errors and omissions ("malpractice") with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. (d) General Insurance Requirements: All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in - T- QO/ responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State Of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policie, are primary and non.ontributing with any Insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnist CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account irsurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless :ITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, fron ail liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys' fees, in aay ma-iner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissior.s of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment): No assignment of this Agreement or of any part cr obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or In part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. 11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, offs ^ers and arents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be -8- ao employees of CITY. 12. Gcverning Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Cilifornia. 13. Attorney's Fees. in the event any legal proceeding is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either ora. or in writing, between the parties with -aspect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representa::on by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not cnntained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by all parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CONSULTANT A"!' : f_..,__ Hotch Bedrosian CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA Jon U. Mikels, mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk- 9- �3 Date: -± / 2. Date: Approved as to form: City Attorney PROPOSED SCOPE OF sEgvTCrS TASK 1 - Prepare Technical Specifications (Spacial Provisions) A. Assemble required technical information - Colloct recent Specifications from nearby agencies, most recent recommendations from Asphalt Institute, and regarding ittraffictcontrol, specifics specification provisions, emulsion break characteristics for seal coating, etc. B. Assemble required information from City of Rancho Cucamonga - Drawings and plats, budgeted funds available, Project No. and specific description, etc. C. Field inspect streets to receive surface treatment. 1. Recommend method of treatment. 2. Measure as required, including measurement of shrinkage cracks for sealing. D. Write Special Provisions and Bid Sheet. I. Major Elements - a. Materials - Bituminous materials and emulsion properties. Aggregate properties. Storage and handling of materials. b. Methods - Proportioning and mixing. Spreading and placement Incl. acceptable rates and temperatures. Protection from damage. c. Measurement and Payment - aoy EXISIT °A" (ContintiaNcn2 2. Minor E:eme�ts - a. Protection of existing improvements. b. Sequence of work /hours of work. c. License and permit requirements. 3. Traffic control - a. Street closure and signing. b. Notification of residents and posting. c. Coordination with other agencies: lire Department Ambulance Service /Paramedics Hater Agency Rubbish Collection Service Sheriff /Police Dept. /Highway Patrol 4. Miscellaneous provisions - TASK 2 - Assemble an-( Edit Specification Package A. Assemble final document: Notice Inviting Bids Instructions to Bidders Proposal Forms (Including Bid Sheet) Contract and Bond Forms General Conditions Special Conditions Location and Vicinity Map Plat showing limits of work to be done B. Edit for consistency 1. Search nBoilarplaten for global replacement Phrases and replace with applicable information: Project Title Rid Time Bid Day Nondays Authorized Data Publish Date Liquid Amount 2 r� EXISIT ^A" (Continuation) 2. Check Denergl Conditions, information to Bidders, Notice Inviting Bids, etc., for general consistency and consistency with Technical Specifications special attention will be paid to provisions regarding measurement and payment, traffic control, hours of work, notification of residents, and coordination with other agencies. 3. Deliver completed package to City of Rancho Cucamonga for final review. TASK 3 - Prepare List of Prospective Bidders Assemble data from other agencies regarding bidders who have recently performed like work in an accept- able manner and prepare mailing list for Notices Inviting Bids. TASK 6 - Sampling and Testing In the event that heator -remix treatment is selected for use on one .,r more streets, each representative pavement section must be sampled and tested to determine the proper amount and type of replacement asphalt to be added to the remixed material to properly rejuvenate and extend the life of the pavement. Typically, this worx consists of extraction of the asphal- tic material from the sample, measurement of miantity to determine remaining asphalt percentage, penetru ion test- ing to determine the penetration grade or viscosity of the existing asphaltic material, and design of a supplemental asphaltic material to return the asphalt quantity 4nd quality to an as -new state. This work will not be required if heater - remixing is not specified. All work under this scope of services will be performed by Donald D. Todd, P.E. Mr. Todd's experience with pavement rehabilitation projects is extensive, and was gained through experience in the cities of Inglewood, Klamath Falls, Vista, and Burbank. All of these cities had regular pavement maintenance pro- grams utilizing multiple rehabilitation methods including slurry seal, chip seal, fog seal, heater remixing, cold and planing sp hi overlays. ecifiedflexiblemembr has membrane Snterlayers(SANI) used flexible membrane seals (SAN). �06 Er I31T 'A "( Continua -ion During his employment with Inglewood (1958 - 1967), Mr. Todd participated in the development process for force- account slurry nealing activities, and acted as project engineer for many miles of heator -remix /thin overlay pavement rehabilitation. During his tenure as City Engineer for the City of Klamath Falls, Oregon, extensive use of the slurry seal process was employed, utilizing a coarser aggregate than is normal u which would Cbeiclassified aspcandidatessfor overlay gin most cummunities in this state. In Vista, Mr. Todd successfully employed a rubber- asphalt stress absorbing, membrane developed by the Citv of Phoenix, Arizona to two miles of Arterial street. This application was the first in Caltrans District 11 and was approved as an experimental FAV project. Chip seal was also extensively employed In Vista During Mr. Todd's tenure as Citf Engineer and Director of Public Works. LEE-0=7 TASKS 1 - 3 $2,270.00 TASK 4 $2,645.00 $4,915.00 ao� EXIBIT "A" (Continua No ) DETAILED ESTIMATF TIME AND F- nnrcrm TASK 1 - Prepare Technical specifications A. Assemble Technical Information 2 hours @ $59.00 .. .....................$116.00 B. Assemble City Project data ... 2 hours @ $58.00 .. ........................$116.00 C. Field Inspection and Measure 8 hours @ $58.00 .. ........................$464.00 D. write Special Previsions 9 'lours @ $58.00 .................... ..... 2464.00 Total Task 1.....$1,160.00 TASK 2 - Assemble and Edit Specification Documents A. Assemble And Edit 6 hours @ $58.00 .. ........................$340.00 B. Consistency Check 4 hours @ $58.00 ........ ....... ....... .0232.00 Total Task 2......$580.00 TASY. 3 - Prepare List of Prospective Bidders 4 hours @ $58.00....... Total Task 3.......$232.00 Subtotal Estimated ffJdget (Tasks 1 -3) 34 hours @ $58.00 .. ....................$1,972.00 Clerical, telephone, mileage, etc. @15%...$299.00 Estimated Budget(Tarks 1- 3) .............$2,270.00 (excluding Sampling 4 Testing) 5 EAIBIT "A" (Continuation) TASK 4 - Sampling and Laboratory Testing (it required) 4 samples @ $75.00 ........................$300.00 Extraction, ponetration testing, measurement Of asphalt quantity. Recommendation for eoclamite application rate 4 @ $500.00 ....... ......................$2.000.00 Subtotal ......... ......................$2,300.00 Overhead @ 15% ...................... ...345.00 Total Task 4, if required ...............$2,645.00 6 ANDADMIN SOTRANION CTION CIVIL ENGINEERING EXI6IT "B" PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF TASK COMPLETION PAVEMENT REHABILITATION OF VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL STREETS, FY 1985 -86, PHASE II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ......... ............................... WEEK 1 2 3 4 5 ...... .............. .. ...... vv.v ...... v TASK MTWTF MTWTF MTWTF MTWTF MTWTF —I XXXXX XXX II XX XXX III XXXX IV XX` XX TASK DESCRIPTIONS I — PREPARE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS IZ — ASSEMBLE & EDIT III — PREPARE BIDDERS LIST IV — SAMPLING & LABORATORY TESTING 9581 Busineaa Canter Ome. Suite Q Rancho CuC=0ng3, CA 91730 (714)989.4755 2197 Calla Rlxoaq Thoueantl Oaks. CA 91362 (805) 529.7146 .D/ d 41/-ACONSTRUCTION ND ADMINISTRATION INSPECTiON CIVIL ENGINEERING EIIBIT "C" SCHEDULE of HOUR w names aMD CHAROs£_S ENGINEERING Principal Engineer ... ......................$58.00 /HR. Staff Engineer ........ .....................$44.00 /HR. Drafter ............... .....................$36.00 /HR. Senior Inspector ...... .....................$40.00 /HR. Inspector ............. .....................$30.00 /HR. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Principal Geologist /Soils Engineer ......... $60.00 /HR. Soils Engineer /Staff Geologist .............$38.50 /HR, Laboratory Technician . .....................$32.50 /HR, Field Technician ...... .....................$32.00 /HR, SURVEYING Principal Land Surveyor ....................$55.00 /HR. Associate Land surveyor ....................$44,00 /HR. Survey party of one ....................... $50.00 /HR. Survey party of two ....................... Survey party of three ............... ...... $135.00 /HR. HISCELLANEOUs Clerical Services ..... .....................524.00 /HR. Computer Time ......... .....................$30.00 /HR. Electronic Total Station ...................$20.00 /IM. Prints, reproduction, and mist. costs at cost + 15% Mileage at $0.24 /mile Rates negotiable; dependent on size and scope of proposed project. 35E18u+inaaa CantarDrlv%Suito G,Rarw..o Cuwmonga,CA91730 (714)969-4755 2197Calto413cat0,ThOeaarjoak,,CA91362 (805)529.7116 ^"r CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT Date, February 27, 1986 Tot City Council and City Fenagor Proms Pill Polley, Director, Community Services Department Subjects Approval of the Terra Vista 'Westeide• Park Concept Development Plan Terra Vista 'Westeide' Park is the second perk in the Terra Vista community to be developed. Located adjacent to a proposed Junior High 7chcol site, the conceptual design for the approximately b acre park taken into consideration the needs of the school children, as well as the general community. Previous discussions with the School District have indicated the need for a softball field which has been incorporated into the park plan. Additionally, the plan proposes a parking area, a childrens play apparatus area, a reetoom building and walkways connecting to adjacent residential areas. At the request of the Park Development Commission, a hard court for basketball has been incorporated into the park development pldn in the open area between the restoom faciltiy and the softball field. The attached exhibit indicdtes the proposed plan for the Terra Vista 'Westeide' Park project. The Park Development Commission and Planning Commission have reviowed the plan and recommended that the plan be submitted tt the City Council for review and approval. Vie Lewis Hoagie Company has indicated that with approval by City Council, they will proceed with the preparation of working drawings. They anticipate the pa-k construction will begin in July 1986. Recommendation, That the City Council review end npprrve the conceptual development plan for "Nestside' Park. a�� m: .4 i r' t .'Y as WEST�I E PARK OV3 j 1 J r r iy rII ia° 1 rn I '' itp rl II I a I c ,r e I° Ir , Rarxbtph Fibk Associates I.r...o..vw• :iw.— o�:rwT.w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1986 'v" TO: City Council and City Manager FRAY: Llo}d B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Baek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Aporoval of Parcel Map 8787 located on the south side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue, submitted by Eighland - Haven Associates. Parcel Map 8787 was approved by the Planning Commission on November 13, 1985 for the division of 48.319 acres into 4 parcels in the Low Divflopment District located on the south side of Highland, east of Haven Avenue Improvements are to be constructed prior to development of these parcris RECOMMENDATIOR It is recomaended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutlor approving Parcel Map 8787, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign map and to cause same to record LBH: Attac'veents SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga p 0 Be, e07 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91170 Gentlemen$ Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final aap of PM 6767 are to be tot and furnished b) a auo • er s engineer or surveyor on or before April 1967 as specified In the Engineer s or urveyor t certificate an agrees to furnish the no thereon to Complete all engineering re quirlments specified In Section 66497, of the Government Code The undersigned hands you herewith the sum of S 1 400.00 as 1 cash deposit, said deposit to gvara +tea t at s mdnunenTs will be set and the notes furnished as above provided an or before the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor will be paid by the undersigned It Is further understood and agreed that In the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the tine specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is awthcrieed to compT Bald requirements or cause them to be completed and the cost thereof Is to be a charge against said cash deposit. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It " further agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and If the e n $nar or surveyor gives the notices prescribed In Section 66197 0 f the Go•rnment Code, the City shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made if the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit. the undersigned agrees to pay the difference wlWm thirty (70) days after receiving written statement from the City of Rancho Cucamonga 1Derlfyi62 the amount of the difference between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirements Cordially, GI oleo De•elo eves Co ration , Subdivider ft c , Ica ns ent 1660 1 Y ntura Boulevard Address vet no. CA 91 Sr Date T7.la. 11/ (98(. The decaliter of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit %hall be e a +e ormss�' NOTE: TO BE SUBNITTEO FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED � ���5— RESOLUTION NO. E'ER 8(o'SS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO„NCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER 8787 (TENTATIVE PARCEL HAP NO. 8787) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8787, submitted by Glenred Development and consisting of 4 parcels, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, east of Haven Avenue at 19th Street, being a division of a portion of Section 36, Township 1 north, range 7 west, Sar. Bernardino Base and Meridian was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 8787 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 8787 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed for record. )ASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTEU this Sth day of March, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon 0, Mikels, Mayor 'TTEST: Bever y uthe et, ty er 1, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rarcho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ranch) Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the * day of *, 19 * *. Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga. California. every , u: a et, ty erk Z / CITY OF RANCHO CUCJUIONGA STAFF REPORT Date, February 26, 1906 for Parch 5 Council To, City Council and City Manager From, Pill Holley, Director Community Services Py, Karen wcC.uire, Assistant Park Planner Suhiert, Award of Pngineerinq Contract For The Hermosa Park Development Project - On Pehruary 14, IgA6, proposals were received from thirteen bidder. for the Hermosa Park Development Project. Each of the firms was highly qualified for the project. Purkise -Pose Associates, located in Fullerton, has been selected to provide the construction drawing packet for the project. Although their bid of 629,500 vas not the lowest received, it is believed that they dll beet Provide the services required. Sufficient funds are available in the Park neveloPment Fund for the award of their t.ld proposed for engineering services. The site plan, previously approved by the Park Development Commission, the Planninq Commission and the City Council, is 10.0 acres in size and includes an extensive pleygronnd and tot lot development, a softball field with soccer overlay, a nine station exercise trail, restroome, shade shelter and picnic facilities alono with full landscaping Improvements. Pecoceendatlon, That City Council award an engineerinq contract to Purkise -rose Associates in the Amount of 52q,50n, and authorize the funding from the park development fund for the full contract amount plus 10% for contingency Purposes. Q17 V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March S, 1916 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND NOTICE OF DETERM- NATT'JN FUR ANNEXATION 06-6COMMUNITY_ FACILITIES DISTRICT 84 -1 (DAY CREEK DRAINAGE SYSTEM). 1) BACKGROUND: The Negative Declaration and Notice of Oeterm7na21on were filed on February 20, 1985, for the Environmental Assessment and Development District Amendment 84- 05 /Tentat!ve Tract 12642 The location extends between the extension of Banyon Avenue and Nighlard on the north and south, and between Rochester and Milliken extension on the east and west. The boundary includes Ass6ssors Parcel Numbers 225 - 141 -08, 12 -19, 21 -28; 225- 151 -01 through 03, 07, 08, 10 -23. The territory is known as Canyon Planned Commur.itv and includes approxic.dtely 240 acres of land in conjunction w'th residential sub - division of 470 lots on 115 acres of land. 21 ANNEXATION 86 -1: Bond Counsel recommended that a separate Negative Declaration and Notice of Deter- mination for Annexation 86 -1, Community Facilities District 84 -1 (Day Creek Drainage System)be filed. 3) Therefore, Staff recommends approval of Public hearing on March 20, 1986 for the Negative Declaratio:. and Notice of Determination for Annexation 86 -1. Additionally, Staff request that the scheduled Public Hearing for Annexation 86 -1 on March 19, 1986 be rescheduled to March 20, 1986 Rasp ctfully sjbmitted Jack C CP, Pmaaf`irector JL:JF:kmm CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March S. 1996 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMLHUMr.HI #1 request amend the Planned Community Text f5F The Victoria Planned Community to allow a recreational vehicle storage lot with mini- warehouse In the Medium High (MH) or High (H) land use category and to allow its operation on a commercial, for rent basis, open to the general public. I. BACKGROUND: This proposal is a request to amend thst portion of Tfi—e—Uo—mmu—nity Plan Text for the Victoria Planned Community that prohibits recreational vehicle storage in the Medium High or High land use categories and further requires that any recreational vehicle storage lot allowed be private. At the Public Hearing for first reading of the Ordinance, the Council raised concern over the issue of whether there is a demand for such a facility at this location in a residential nei9556Frlcod. The Council directed that prior to consideration of this Ordinance for second reading, Staff submit further information detailing the need for such a facility, i.e. if it were built, would it be used, and by whom? II. ANALYSIS: The Victoria Planned Community permits single family eve opment on individual lots as small as 3,000 square feet. The Planning Commission felt that these smaller lots could not accommdate storage of recreational vehicles, trailers, campers, boats, etc. Therefore, the Community Plan was amended and included a provision requiring RV storage and allowing the ability to mass these storage spaces Into storage lots This Amendment Is being requested to allow development of an RV storage facility being proposed in fulfillment of the requirements of the Community Plan Text. In response to the Council's request for a more detaileJ analysis as to the need for such a facility, the William (yon Co., the project applicant, has submitted an analysts of their proposal for the storage facility prepared by John Yelland of Yelland Properties. In summary, Mr. Yelland concludes the proposed Q1 8- CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT March 5, 1986, VPCA 85 -01 Page 2 facility makes intelligent use of the intended parcel, 1s in a desirable location and offers a full range of services that based on current growth trends can be reasonably be expected tome report Indicates a demand for at least square feet of storage within a 2 mile radius, the study contains no data on the amount of existing square footage, approved or under, construction. In actuality, there are no storage facilities either approved or under construction within a 2 mile radius. However, there are plans currently under review by the City to develop about 41,000 square feet of self storage space at the southwest corner of Foothill and Rochester (CUP 85 -26). The complete report is included In the attachments for your review and consideration. I11. RECOtMENDATION: The Planning Commisison recomtends approval of s oamun y Plan Text Amendment. If the City Council concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the attached Ordinance would be in order. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:BC:das Attachments: City Council Staff Report VPC 85 -01, February 19, 1986 Planning Connisslon Staff Report for WC 85 -01, January 8, 1986 Planning Conmisilon Resolution 85 -01 Planning Commission Staff Report CUP 85 -26, January 8, 1986 Planning Commisison Resolution 86 -02 Analysis of Victoria Storage Center by John Yelland, Septerber 3, 1985 City Council Ordinance Q19 vnTT^ nf?n 1 vnwrn STAFF REPORT UN 197) DATE: February 19, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLAWIED COMMUNITY N - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A request to amen a Planned ommun ty extT —io tTie _Victoria Planned Community, to allow a recreational vehicle storage lot with mini- warehouse in the Medium -High (MH) or High (H) land use category, and to allow Its operation on a commercial, for rent basis, open to the general public. BACKGROUND: This proposal is a request to amend that Portion of tFe_�a_w_n1ty Plan Text for the Victoria Planned Community, that prohibits recreational vehicle storage in the Medium High or High land use categories, and further requires that any recreational vehicle storage lot allowed be private. The applicant is requesting approval to develop a commercial recreational vehicle storage lot with mini- warehouse. This request for a recreational storage faciltty is being proposed in fulfillment of the standard for the Victoria Planned Community requiring recreational vehicle storage be provided within each residential land use category of Low, Low- Medium, and Medium, for 25% of the lots or units contained within those lots within the Victoria Planned Community. In conjunction with this proposal to amend the Community Planned Text, the Planning Commission has tentatively approved a Conditional Use Permit (CUP 85 -26), to develop a recreational vehicle storage facility with mini- warehouse on 4+ acres of land, located on the north side of rase Line, east of the Southern California Edison Utility Corridor. Copies of the Planning Commission staff reports are attached for your information. II. CORRESPONDENCE: This Community Planned Amendment has been a verrt ism public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper. III. FACTS FOR FINDING: Before approving this Planned Community Text Amendment, the CoTncil must determine that the amendment will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposal must be consisten, with the intent of the General Plan, and with the Victoria Planned Community. U -) L) CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT February 19, 1986 Victoria Planned Community Amendment 85 -01 Page /2 IV. RECOMIENDATION The Planning Commission recomnends approval of t st s CTif onmun�ly Plan Text Amendment. If the City Council concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the attached Ordinance would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:SC:cv Attachments: Planning Commission Staff Report for VPC 85 -01, January 8, 1986 Planning Commission Resolution 86 -01 Planning Commission Staff Report for CUP 85 -26, January 8, 1986 Planning Commission Resolution 86 -02 City Council Ordinance ,D,;L / Ci"Y OF RANCHO CUCAiAlONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 8, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COX4UNITY WMENr ff M N 1 request CO amen c e anne ommun ty text or t e ictaria Planned Community to allow commercial recreational vehicle storage and mini - warehouse in the (Medium -High) Residential District. Related Fite: CUP 85 -26 I. ABSTRACT:_ This proposal is a request to amend that portion of the �aunit. Plan text for the Victoria Planned Community that prohibits recreational vehicle storage in the Medium High or High land use categories, and further requires that any recreational vehicle storage allowed be private. The applicant is requesting approval to develop a commercial recreational vehicle storage lot with mini- warehouse, to the Medium -High land use category on the north side of Base Line, east of Edison utility corridor. II. BACKGROUND: The Victoria Planned Community requires that retreat on al vehicle storage be provided within each residential land use category of Low, Low - Medium, and Medium, for 25% of the lots or units contained within those lots within the Victoria either on othheW site of each development, orowithini theoboundries provided the Victoria Planned Community, as a private recreational vehicle storage lot. The William Lyon Company is proposing this development (CUP 85 -26), to fill this requirement of the Victoria Planned community. 111. ANALYSIS: The Victoria Planned Community encompasses approximately T—,976 '—acres, and is planned for an ultimate butidout of over 8,010 homes. Since its adoption in 1981, 21239 dwelling units have so far either been developed, approved, or planned within Victoria (see Exhibit °A•). This equates to a requirement of 560 recreational vehicle spaces. 'Daa- ITEM C PLANNING COICiISSION i'F REPORT VICTORIA PLANNED C07T ,ITV AMENDMENT 85 -01 l January 8, 1986 Page 2 The Community Plan allows the flexibility of providing the RV spaces either on an individual lot basis, or as a recreational storage lot. The ability to have an RV storage lot within the boundries of Victoria is because of the fact that the Community Plan permits smaller sized lots for single family homes, and these lots would not be large enough to accommodate on -site storage of recreational vehicles. However, with the development of an RY storage facility, the Community Plan requlres that this facility: a. Be a private facility for the exclusive use of Victoria residents. b. Not be located within the Medium -High (MH) or High (H) land use designations (see Exhibit "B "). The William Lyon Company is proposing the development of a 263 space RV storage lot. Also included is the provision of nearly 33,000 square feet of mini- warehouse storage space, as well as a dwelling unit for a resident caretaker. This RV storage tot would - atisfy the need for the 225 RV spaces (see Exhibit "A "). However, for the William Lyon Company to develop the facility as proposed would require an amendmei,t to the Community Plan. The Community Plan %pecifies that any RV storage lot within Victoria be a private facility for the exclusive use of Victoria residents The Lyon Company's prroosal is for a commercial, business- for - profit venture open to the general public. The rationale for this approach is the belief that the facility would be better maintained and provide better service for both the residents of Victoria and of the entire City if operated as a commercial venture rather than by a homeowner's group, the likely operators of a private lot. In regard to the current restriction of a RV storage lot In either the 'MHO or "H" land -use districts, Staff does not believe this to be the most efficient approach. Instead of regulating the location of RV storage determined by zoning, Staff believes a more viable approach is to regulate based upon conformance to performance standards. That is to say, it makes more sense to determine an appropriate location for such a facility based upon such parameters as site location, access, compatibility to surrounding land uses, quality of design, etc., rather than as to the zoning of the site Another issue raised as a result of this proposal is the appropriateness of a mini- warehouse storage facility. The Community Plan makes no reference to mini - warehousing as a permitted use An argument can be made that mini - warehousing, i.e., enclosed storage space of personal items, is a related and Mm PLANNING COH4ISSION 'F REPORT VICTORIA PLANNED C January 8, 1986 OMR04TY AMENDMENT 85 -01 Page 3 complimentary use to RV storage It 1s Just as viable an assumption that people who live in the Victoria Community will require enclosed storage space for their personal belongings as well as requiring storage space for their recreational vehicles. IV. FACTS FOR FINDING: In order to consider approval of this request, the ann n9 omm ssion must 'ind that this amendment is consistent with Victoria Planned Community and the General Plan. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public hearing nhe Da a ors newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to a prcperty owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider a material and Input regarding this project. If the mm Coission concurs with the Facts for Findings, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of Negative Declaration would be in order. Respectfully submitted, de'e 64 AAI�� Brad Buller City Planner BB:BC:cv Attachments: Exhibit •A" _ Victoria Recreational Vehicle Analysis Exhibit •B" - Resolution 81 -37 Conditions Numbers 5 and 6 - General as V, C C VICTORIA RV ANALYSIS TRACT NO. LAND USE f OF UNITS f OF RV SPACES REQUIRED 11934 Low Medium 123 31 " 12044 Low Medium 101 25 ' Low 76 19 * 12045 Low Medium 271 68 * 12046 Low 174 44 12832 Low Medium 135 34 12833 Low Medium 117 29 * 13022 Low Medium 94 24 Medium 181 45 * 13027 Low 157 39 * 13052 Low Medium 226 56 13057 Low Medium 142 36 13058 Medium 202 50 * 13059 Low Medium 154 38 * 13060 Low 86 22 TOTAL 2239 560 *Tracts on which recreational vehicles storage spaces are provided on individual lots. Number of RV spaces required: 560 Number of RV spaces provided: 335 Notes: 225 RV spaces needed 1. Tracts 11934, 12832, 12833, 12022 (Medium L -U only), 13057 and 13058 have no designated RV storage spaces. 2. The total RV storage space of these tracts is 225 spaces. 3. The proposed RV storage lot has 263 spaces. 4. Built tracts: 11934, 12044, 12045 (partial), 12046 (partial). S. Tracts under construction: 12045, 12046, 12833 6. Approved tracts: 12832, 13022, 13027, 13052 7. Submitted tracts: 13057, 13058, 13059, 13060 ���ria. �l,�llec✓��1u��1i� �ai'iioit5o�'��vzY•� Resolution 110 81 -37 Page 2 3 The Planned Cor:runity text shall be revised to incorporate all conditions of approval where appropriate and to pro- vide revisions in organization of the text from page 171 to the end of the text to the satisfaction of the City Planner 4. Definitions shall be added or deleted to the appendix A to coincide with the additions and /or deletions that have occurred as a result of the revisions in the regulations section to the satisfaction of the City Planner S. Recreation vehicle storage shall be provided within each residential land use category of low, low- medium, medium, for 25% of the lots or units contained within those units within the Victoria Planned Comrunity RV storage shall be provided on the •ite of each development or within the boundaries of the Planned Community as a private recreation vehicle storage lot The percent shall be revised on an annual basis and may be modified by the Planning Commission 6 Recreation vehicle storage shall not be permitted in the medium -high or high land use category and shall be restricted by CURS, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney 7 Affordable housing shall be provided in accordance with the revised regulations text, page 225: 8. All tentative tracts shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee prior to consideration by the Planning Commission and shall comply with Ordinance 86 - Growth Managemnt 9 forty -five days after City Council consideration for approval of the Victoria Planned Community, a revised text incorporating all of the changes and organizational changes necessary shall be s1bnitted to the City Planner for review and comment prior to a final draft text being reprinted for redistribution to the City Council, the City Clerk, the Planning Commission and Staff vFi✓ 4T J6�4 $6-Z�� ok-� I I r RESOLUTION No 86 -01 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA mLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF VICTORIA PLANNED COKXUNITY AMENDMENT 85 -01, TO MODIFY THE COWNNITY PLAN TEXT TO ALLOW A RECREATIONAL VEHICLE ST04AGE LOT WITH PINI- WAREHOUSE AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE MEDIAN -HIGH (MH) LAND USE CATEGORY, AND TO ALLOW ITS OPERATION ON A COMMERCIAL, FOR RENT BASIS OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLILC. WHEREAS, or. the 8th day of January, 198E, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will provide for recreational vehicle storage lot in fulfillment of the requirements of the Victoria Planned Community. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following Tindings 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of aucess, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district charge I* in conformance with the General Ulan and the victoria Planned Community. SECTION Rancho pe asnsthis projectwiTT not create a significantadvers Impcton the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on January 9, 1986. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That purse nt to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission. of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Victoria Planned'Community Amendment 85 -01. PLANNING COMMISSIOI1' SOLUTION C VICTORIA PLANNED COTWNITY AMENDMENT 85-01- - January 8, 1986 Page 2 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approved and adopt Victoria Planned Community Amendment 85 -01 to modify the Community Plan Text as follows: (a) Condition 05 of 'General' of Resolution No. 81 -37 to read as follows: 'Recreational Vehicle storage shall be provided within each residential land use category of Low. Low - Medina, and Medium for 25% of t..e lots or units contained within those lots within the Victoria Planned Community. RV storage shall be provided within the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Community. The ppercent of recreational vehicle storage spaces shall be revised on an annual basis and may ba modified by the Planning Commission.' (b) Condition ®6 of 'General' of Resolution No. 81 -37 to read as foll; ins: 'Recreational Vehicle Storage' shall not be permitted in the Medina -High or High land use category uidess within a designated RV storage lot, and shall be restricted by CC d R's subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. Recr- atlonal vehicle storagge lots any be permitted within the boundaries of the Victoria Planned Community subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. Prior to approving a CUP for a RV storage lot, the Planning Comm ssiol shall make the following findings: (1) That the size and configuration of the proposed RV storage lot 1s adequate for the planned development. (2) That the location of the proposed facility is adjacent to a primary circulation route to permit reasonable access to the facility xithout resulting in negative impacts for- surrounding properties (3) That the proposed RV storage lot is compatible with exlating surrounding uses, or with those further uses permitted in the land use designations. M11 PLANNIRG COMNISSIOy SOLUTION t VICTORIA PLANNED C iUNITY AMUDn£NT 85 -01 January 8, 1986 Page 3 (4) That the proposed RV storage lot would not be detrimental to and result in significant negative apacts for surrounding properties, property owner, and /or residents. (5) That the total number of RY spaces provided, whether as spaces on an individual lot basis or within a RV storage lot, does not exceed more than 25% of the total number of dwelling units in the Low, Law - Medium, d Medium land use categories. :lint - warehousing may be permitted when in conjunction with an RV storage lot developed in conformance to the above referenced requirements. (1) A mint- warehouse shall be defined as a structure or group of structures providing enclosed and locked coapartrents for the dead storage of customer goods and wares where individual lockers or stalls are rented out to different tenants for storage. As w'th the primary RV storage tot, a mini- warehouse facility shall be designed to primarily cater to the needs of the residents of the Victoria Planned Community. (2) RV storage lots when developed with accessory mini- warehouse shall conform to the following development standards: (a) The minimum area of a lot for a mini - warehouse facility shall be 2 acres. (b) The maximum building height shall be 2 stories or 25 ft., except that any building 0 portion of a building within 25 ft. f the front or street side setback shall havoe a maximum height of 1 story or In ft. (c) Only one point of ingress and egress shall be allowed, unless another is required by the Fire 0epartment. All driveways shalt be radius type, and shall have an unobstructed I ength of 40 ft. from the curb to prevent vehicles and trailers from interfering with traffic flaw in the street. PLANNING COMISSIONrSOLJTION VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 85 -01 January 8, 1986 Page 4 (d) Two (2) covered parking spaces shall be Provided adjacent to the manager's residence /office. In addition, one (1) parking space for every 10,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, or a minimum of three (3) Parkin' spaces for facilities of less than 30,000 sq. ft, of grass floor area, shall be located adjacent to the office for the use of prospective clients. Required parking shall not be rented or used for vehicular storage. (e) Building materials and treatment shall complement those existing in the surrounding area. (f) Outdoor storage area shall be permanently screened so as not to be visible from the public right -of -way or from adjacent lots. (9) All utilities shall be underground. No water, gas or electric service shall be provided to the individual units. (h) On -site, 24 -hour management shall be provided. (i) The Planning Commission shall establIall hours of operation as a condition of approval for any conditional use permit granted for a RV storage /mini- warehouse facility. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. PLAN` COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY enms out, Caiman ArrEST• �a u er, eputy ecrecar— y - x-30 PLANNING conm551cr ESOLUTION VICTORIA PLANNED COMUNITY &MOMENT 85-01 — January 8, 1986 Page 5 I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of January, 1 --6, by the follewir-.' vote -to -wit: AYES: COMtlISSIONERS: BARKER, MCNIEL, CNITIEA, REAPEL, STOUT NOES: COI:4ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COWSSIONERS: NONE C)13/ C C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIIONGA STAFF REPORT c r 0 0 DATE: January 8, 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Bruce Cook, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 85 -26 Tffr W L ON 0 N - he deve opment of the camnerc a recreational vehicle storage with mini - warehuuse on 4.4 acres of land in the Victoria Planned Community (Medium -High) Residential, 14 -24 du /ac), located on the north side of Base Line Road, east of the Southern California Edison Utility Corridor APII: 227 -091 -42. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTI0N: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan, elevations, and ssuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Southern Pacific Railroad; single - family residential, Low - Medium wittin the Victoria Planned Community (4-8 du /ac) South - Vacant, Industrial planned; Heublein out - parcel within the Victoria Planned Community Fast - Vacant, abandoned 04neyards; Medium -High Residential within the Victoria Planned Community (14 -24 du /ac) West - Southern California Edison Utility Corridor C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac North - Railroad Right -of -Nay; Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) South - High Residential (24 -30 du /ac) East - Medium -High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) West . Utility Corridor .;� 3 ITEM D IV 7 PLANNING COMMISSION rF REPORT Conditional Use Permtd5 -26 l January 8, 1986 Page 2 D. Site Chareeteristic1. An 180 foot by 1,031 foot parcel, on the north s e o aSe Line Road, bounded by the west by the Southern California Edison Utility Corridor, and to the east by vacant land designated for Medium -High (14 -24 du /ac) residential development (not controlled by the William Lyon Co.). The site slopes to the south at approximately a 3% grade. Eucalyptus windrows are present along the northern and southern site perimeters and a number of existing trees are scattered throughout the project site. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The Proposed facility includes 263 recreational ve` cTe parking spaces, seven guest parking spaces, 32,893 square feet of mini - warehouse storage space, and 2,100 square feet of office and caretaker's residence. Additional facilities include a recreational vehicle wash and dump station near the project entrance. Architecture along the Base Line frontage is reminisent of a Victorian "railroad depot" design, combining stucco with wood -type siding. Roofing material is proposed as asphalt shingle. A number of trees are present on the project site, including Blue Gum Eucalyptus trees along both the northern and southern perimeters of the project site. The trees at the northern perimeter are adjacent to the railroad right -of -nay. For past projects, the Comnission has required that the Blue Gums adjacent to the railroad be removed and replaced by the Spotted Gum (E. maculatta), per the windrow replacement standards as specified in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Blue Gum trees along the southern perimeter are at the Base Line frontage, and should be replaced with street trees per Victoria Landscape Standards. in regard to the trees in the site interior, again sufficient information is not available at this time as to their numbers, species, size or orecise location. However, at the Design Review meeting, the Committee did offer the direction that in relation to landscaping of the project site, the primary consideration should be landscaping and design of the project perimeter to soften the visual impacts from off - site views into the site, and not internal landscaping of the facility. B. Oes1 n Review Committee: The Design Review Committee approved tKepro ect•su ect to t e following recommendations: 1. The circulation system should be modified to allow functional use of the pull- through spaces -where a vehicle can access a space without having to back -up. �J PLANNING COM4ISSION fr'P REPORT Conditional Use Permit d5 -26 January 8, 1986 Page 3 2. Potable water should be provided. 3. All roofing material should be tile. 4. In relation to landscaping of the project site, the primary consideration should be the landscaping and design of the project perimeter to soften the visual impacts from off -site views into the site and not internal landscaping of the facility. S. Provide treatments to perimeter walls to soften their visual impacts by such means as using alternating materials, creating shadow lines, vine planting, pocket Insets of landscaping, etc. 6. Nall heights should be increased from 6 to 8 feet for means of additional screening and security. These comments have been inclumed into the Conditions of Approval. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee rev eweo the pro ect an etermined that with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with the applicable standards and conditions. 0. UCilit Under roundin Overread utilities exist along the Base Line Roa frontage of the proposed project. The project has a relatively narrow frontage (178 feet S). To underground the total Droject 'rootage would require extending to the nearest utility poles. To do this would require undergrounding of 400 feet, a distance which is more than double the project frontage. The existing pole line is considerably south of its ultimate alignment; therefore, angle poles may be required at an additional expense. Based or the above, staff recommends that the developer not be required to underground the existing utilities at this time, but rather be required to pay an in- lieu fee as a contributor to a future undergrounding project for a longer reach along Base Line. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the I,A tial Study has been completed y t e app cant. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Checklist and found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. A copy of Part Il of the Environmental Checklist is attached for your review and consideration. A number of existing mature trees are present on the project site. As a means of implementing City policy of tree preservation, a master plan of trees and tree removal permit shall be required prior to the issuance of building permits. z;o 5 PLANNING COK41SSION Y "F REPORT Conditional Use Peron d5 -26 January 8, 1586 Page 4 C IV. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Victoria anned ommun ty as amended, within Victory Planned Community Amendment (VPC) 85 -01 and the General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site PI an, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval are in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Cwmunity, the Development Code and City Standards. V. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing In The Daily Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices were sent to a property owners within 300 feet of the project site. VI. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission cans d—e ali— material input regarding this project. If the Commission concurs with the Facts for Findings, and Conditions of Approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and Issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:LC:cv Attachments: Exhibit •A• - Exhibit •B" - Exhibit 'L• - Exhlbit •D" - Exhibit •E• - Exhibit •F• - Initial Study Resolution of Land Use Map Location Map Detailed Site Plan Preliminary Landscaping Plan Conceptual Grading Plan Building Elevat.ons Part II Approval with Conditions wll;;z tL �;• • _ rFN• VICTORIA LAKES /r ,.nom` LAND USE LEGEND uva.+ua 1 �pYYI.G4 � e 'I inn Q wll;;z tL �;• • _ rFN• VICTORIA LAKES /r ,.nom` LAND USE LEGEND uva.+ua �pYYI.G4 Q G ....a. w..w.. n.n. mYn v.0 C=1 O COMMUNITY PLAN Victoria A Planned Community In Rancho Cucamonga N n n R � c n R6 9 b b tl r b i N b v 0 T In I IV Sam d N n m -w m S rm N N N m y 2 0 0 a 2 2 m 0 yO K FI 8 a O S O 2 r m OI V O a S 7 N m 7 O A b m b 0 n m R O 6 A b b 6 b � v a n � s n n ggK_ O SAC � b b a 0 d 6 � O n � � n o � A o i o � R n R 6 b N R R � n N O N � o R OI O n 9 n n � n � N 0 R a n V � R W T v ti 0 3T Y H n a� B var.u� w (� nm zu s r GwP_�a� r� mi alit 0 6 °a z 0 U 0W U to 2 F � z Z LU VJ U to U) < c"Tlw M,Q l t i r , y�y�SII �ffi l G Y a 0 z a W a� /0/ v/� y z O ��a � vO a� oc � 0 U� ^'• tea- � �II,�� ° ID r�r � li.i (GUI s r GwP_�a� r� mi alit 0 6 °a z 0 U 0W U to 2 F � z Z LU VJ U to U) < c"Tlw M,Q l t i r , y�y�SII �ffi l G Y a 0 z a W a� /0/ v/� y z O ��a � vO a� oc � 0 U� 1 ®f 1 o t j1J i •• r $,1li i � d 0 3 d !o � • 1 X39 4t-re ?6&VA i� i / r � r C iiF swa�f � 7 G � i a It ZZZI vm,: i 7 , i NO 4 ONIOV!!D ltl(Lld3'JNOO We Pik I MOB; . I • ! n ICI � ' •u.�; -- It � • x..;14._ 't . e la, it 11!! {,till! �._ I!�� IlEl It'll 9 _ _ .dill, ,,� u!. �i I,:: —t ' • �-'��� ... .,: „ lip r a ° •'_ '�-- at � � � ga {I q it • OgYNY . wVMLW � •- p 56 -110 F-VAT90. c L 0 DLii% Gi.w�t10�: CITY. OF RANCHO CUCA.y0S0A PART II - INITIAL STUDY ENVIRO* -FAL CHECKLIST APPLICA::r:__TE j L_u_, LYn.t FILING DATE:l9&S LOO NUMER: /-tip 155 - 2L (Qat-�R,,at VF PROJECT: VrAug,co,=M. rr M QV Linos 1 J, PROJECT LOCATION:_p)L$ lb�ws 26o, sk, WK. �� p Fwae,.t Ll.tty .t. f I. ENWIRO:.M TAL IMPACTS C.V4mOmg. (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sh its). YES MAYBE NO I. Soils and Ceoloxv, Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? b. Disruptlora, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? C. Change in topography or ground surface contour intervals? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential Increase in wind or water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off sit* conditons? 4Z f, Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? -_ g Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? h. An increase in the rata of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? _ -- 2. Hydral*SY. Will the proposal have significant results in: A. Change In the characterlstics of species, including diversity; distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare of endangered species of plants? Page 2 c c YES Y.tYBE NO A- Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing streams,_ri1,rs, or ephemeral stream channels? be Changes in absorption races, drainage patterns, or the rate atd amount of surface water runoff? _- c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? -- d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body .Y- of water? —_ e. Discharge Into surface waters, or an an y alteration of surface water qualrt f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? -- x g. Change in the quantity of ground state. either through direct additions r with- o drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? h. The reduction in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? _ -- 1. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or sefch,&? _ -- 3. Air Ouality. will the proposal have significant results in: a. Constant or periodic air emissions tror mobile or indirect sources? Stationary sources? .� —_ b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? c. Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or tem;erature? A. More _XC Flora, Will the proposal have significant results fn—. A. Change In the characterlstics of species, including diversity; distribution, or number of any species of plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare of endangered species of plants? Page 2 C C YES YA1'SE \0 c. Introduction of nov or disruptive species of Plants into an area? d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural Production? Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results in: -- a Charge in the characteristics of species, Including varsity, distribution, or nuahers of any species of animals? b. Reduction of the nuxbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of anicals3 -- C. Introduction of new or disruptive spocics of anl=ls into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of exiatirb fish or wildlife habitat? S. POPulation. Will the proposal have significant results int a. WL11 the proposal altar the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or grouch rate of the Mean population of an area; b. Will the proposal affect existing housing. or create a demand for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Facrors. Will the proposal have significant raeults in: A, Change is local or regional soelo- economic characteristics, including economic or co= ercial diversity, tax race, and property values; b. Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries. I.e., buyers, tax Payers or project user,? 31 Land L'se and Planning Considerations. Will the -- proposal have aignif Icant rea�lu in? a A aubstanaal altaration of the present or Planned land use of an area? b. A conflict vith any designations, objectives, Policies, or adopted plans of any governmental entities? -- c, An impact upon the qulalty or quantity of existing consumptive of non- consompcive recreational opportunities? — -- Page 3 CC page 4 YES :aY9E NO 8. Transeortation Will the proposal have significant results Sn: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? C. Effects on existing p -rking facilities, or demand for new parking? -- x d. Substantial Impact upon existing transporta- tion systems? e. Alterations to present Patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? _ I. Alterations to or effects on present and potential warur- borne, rail, mss transit or air traffic? g. Increases In traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? - - x 9. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, Paleontological, and /or historical resources, _- 30 Health. Sa[ery, mad Nufsance Factors. Will the ro pposal have significant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? e. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous ' substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogeni[ organisms or the exposure of people to such organisms? e. Increase in existing noise levels? f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? �' aZ g. The creation of objectionable odors? —_ h. An Increase in light or glla�ral , �i� c c C. An increase In the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non- ronewable fors of energy, when feasible ionewable sources of energy are availablo? __ a( Xt Page S °qBE %0 11 Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant rosuacs in: a. The obstruction or d= gradation of any scenic vista or view? b The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? C. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? 12. Utilities and Public Sarvices. Will the proposal have a slgniticanr neetl for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? c. C'O=uniWtlon9 aystems? d. Water supply? e. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? _ -- 4:f x S. Solid waste facilities? h. Fire. protection' -- 44 1. Police protection? —� J. Schools? —. k. Parks or other recreational facilities? 1, llilntonance of public facilities, including JX roads and flood control fac111tias? G. Other governmental services? 17. Enerev and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have sSgnSf Scant results in a Use of substantial o- wcessive fuel or energy? , _- b. Substantial Increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? C. An increase In the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non- ronewable fors of energy, when feasible ionewable sources of energy are availablo? __ a( Xt Page S t CPage 6 YES MAYBE NO e. Substantial depletia, of any nonrenewable or Scarce natural resourco? 14 Mandatory Findings of Sigiificance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal coounity, reduce the numbet or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -tem. to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -tem impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period ..f time while long - rcm impacts will endure well luto the future). _- c. Does the project have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the increcental effects of an Individual project are considerable when viewed In connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or Indirectly? II. DISCUS'TON OF 11't2i'V'WTAL EVALUAT104 (i a of affirmative M answers to above ques dons plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures)• e Y8 C % Page 7 III DETF,",LfrNATIOY On the basic of this Initial evaluation: IY-1 find the enviranrent. andlac \tCAlit ZhDEChLARAIIONwillibenprepared. effect I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the eoviron=onr, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the ulcigation measures described on an attached shoat have been added to the project A :IECATit DECLARATION WILL 8E pREPA3LD. !� I find the proposed project FAY have a significant effect on the L_I envirnment. and an E:NIRO -%ENT 12H0'ACT REPORT Is requ• d Dace_��,2q /p{ azure Tic e �i / I RESOLUTION NO. 66 -02 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSIOt! APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 85 -26 FOR A RV STORAGE LOT WITH MINI - WAREHOUSE LOCATED Ott THE NORTH SIDE OF BASELINE, EAST OF THE SOUTHFRN CALIFORNIA EDISON UTILITY CORR100R IN THE MEDIUM -n:.H RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14 -24 DU /AQ WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COt:WHITY. NNEREAS, on the 28th day of August, 1985, a complete application was filed by •iilllam Lyon Co. for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of January, 1986, the Rat.ho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. fatlows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cecamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Victoria Planned Community, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions aPplicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use complies with each of the i applicable provisions of the Victoria Planned Community. SECTION 2: That this croject will not create adverse impacts on the enviromaen a' at a Negative Declaration 1; issued on January 8, 1986. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 85 -26 is approved subject to —ii—ie following conditions: f C Planning 1. The approval of this permit is lranted subject to the approval and adoption of Victoria Planneo Community Amendment (VPC) 85- 01 by the City Council. With adoption of VPC 85 -01, this prnject shall conform to all rf its requir2ments for a RV storage lot. 2. The mint- warehouse �,ortion of this facility shall operate only per the parameters of the de'tnition of a mint- warehouse as specified, in the victoria rr.nmuntty Plan. 3. The parking spaces within the storage lot shall only be used for the storage of recreational vehicles and for no other purposes. 4. Covered enclosed parking shall be provided for the caretaker's unit. S. A master plan of trees shall be provided and a Tree Removal Permit granted for any trees to be removed prior to the issuance of permits. The existing Blue Gum Eucalyptus shall be removed along the project's northern perimeter and shall be replaced by the Eucalyptus Maculata, minimum 15 gallon size, planted at 8 feet on center. 6. The final design of the Base Line parkway shall be consistent with the approved standard for Base Line Road. This design shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans submitted for the review and approval of the Planning Division prior to the issuance of permits. 7. The circulation system shall be modified to allow functional use of pull- through spaces where a vehicle can access a space without having to back up. 8. Potable water shall be provided. 9. All roofing material on the caretaker's quarters is to be tile to the satisfaction of the City P anner. 10. The on -site landscaping should be designed with emphasis to screen and soften visual impacts from off -site views. 11. Treatments shall be provided to perimeter walls to soften their visual impacts by such means as using alterneting materials, creating shadow lines, vine plantings on wall, etc. to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Page 3 C 12. Masonry walls are to be provided along all property perimeters. Nall heights shall be increased from 6 to 8 fee for means of additional screening an, %ecurity. The wall along Base Line shall be staggered to increase variety and visual interest. 13. Final plans shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits. Engineering I. The developer's engineer shall provide a vertical alignment design for Base Line Road from Day Creek Boulevard to victoria Park Lane to be approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. The construction of pertions of the street improvements may have to be deferred un:tl a longer reach of roadway can be constructed, therefore, and in lieu, cash payment to the City will be required for deferred improvements. 2. The method of draining the site shall be compatible with the desigr, of Base Line Road as approved by the City Engineer. If drainage is to be directed to the south as proposed, an easement from Base Line Read to the retention basin to the •outh will be required prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 3. 1 detailed Hoed report for the project shall be prepared by the developers Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. The report shall contain detailed information such as calculations, sections, etc., to justify the proposed designs. In particular an indeoth analysis of the method of protecting the site from flows through the railroad culvert directly to the north of the project (240 cfs shown on the preliminary report) shall be provided. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall pay an in -lieu fee for one half the cost of undergrounding the existing overhead utilities fronting the site on Base Line Road. The fee shall be held for contribution to the future undergrounding of tl.e utilities within the project area. Page 4 �r C APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 87H DAY OF JANUARY, 1986. PLANNO'COMISSION 0 THE CITY OF W4CHO CUCAMONGA B �'e'.7rs'"['qq—yout. it ////��� ma�n ATTEST:_ 1(iJ �(/, it r m er, eputy iecretary 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucanonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc=nga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of January, 1986, by the following vote -to -aft: AYES: CO?MMIDNERS: REMPEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, HCNICt, STOUT NOES: COM4ISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: CO.NHISSIONERS: NONE 1S3 2 # ; � ! / .TE / � § \� � | % % |5gwg � � /\ ; #/ 2 \22 ) ! 2 I 7: �! /�I�a! �\ .`■ \k t� R#• - #� i \ � f. !" § - § � \� ! Cz §! &d §f�j _ 1g !< ,n --A \ if = L� ■ ; - � �! \ )/ 2 /l7!!/ Z/ ` � \qt § ■�Id�� �v � G | | 1 1 / /C7 /�! 2 ZX!j 2 � 4 / ­j nt / \ ! AM � Alp y §| / }72! { poi; 1. -% §�! I j iq :� 6� ! � \� !j � ifil � � � e \\ \a / i \ |\ /\ \ Z 461 @ 4 \ !E q gi \ �\ / 2,:8 \ \\ § � j \ 2 R §\ % | \/§ \\ \ 3: @ E \! K # |\! !| j \ \ §\ -Mir t_4- ,1=h -_ . •,� <r :!,!! � ; __ //I c : r _ /\ !a§ � \��` a \\ \ §§ \ � e2 \ 2 \a : -a /{§ ©R\ \ a= -!| t §� ©2 r z ; __ //I c : r _ /\ !a§ � \��` a \\ \ §§ \ � DL u u G O 6 jab= aii;$ SYS --`YY - S .Y"I :• s:a si e3��.aa9�xc iay�= c$ $a � Y= �= ffiQ _a.g i3 Y= cmp $HakaL- ;g paFri ig g ^•�s .. 3$3 ag a8 E = rear F- sag Ayes I- _ _S y-YY3 [Y ES�j 4 fa 4 i .9 IL ice. •$zs 5 F� Y- = ,� :3t ?? aiF_ 3{ „Yra :3.. 4i ;3 -- -gam y ,S - ... - .� 3Yb7 3- 6_iE ° asp - 4 irY .[S •F =rte` F_3 -? ss6Y$ �i. i34E i HW siY' [3 d y z"� 8!Y cc. foBE a'i �Sa Yo :II e,c IL a g ' a " -- 4!3 ag•'Y SII1 "� a Y'' 3aY' y L88 3 a- 8. a h�YC at a EIV eex 3Yc s� a- 'y €a�: s wiz- F= t is Yepz - a eL�SI X,; 3 8$y 45 f i34E i siY' [3 d y z"� 8!Y cc. foBE Y= Ee= Yo :II e,c IL HN �g3 ag•'Y SII1 "� a Y'' 3aY' az 3 a- IS. h�YC at a EIV gaaY ?r. l3'7 isgsla €a�: s iE F= t dais _ � - a eL�SI 0 3 i34E siY' [3 d y z"� 8!Y cc. foBE Y= Ee= Yo :II e,c IL HN COQ= = az g.r IS. h�YC at jx hh ca 'ir? F= t - Y0 yi ny_e eL�SI 0 j�a 8$y 45 f = -II I a3 a G Y= Ee= Yo :II e,c IL HN = az g.r IS. h�YC at jx hh ca - Y0 yi S II 8$y YX_ ,� Iaa ;dare, : • y � — o�: use :sie��• �__ �_ � f � �a�s 3s� :3I=ee LIE X" HK Y _ 5 ( xi ^( ( ^( •( N N11 ri`%: u $ 3 =; �' t. zp ?€ g. z�Y; ?':ae •his ^E. r = =i Y_e =s =` � 'LL9e i Zip V. ie �_• __- a ]ye :2 8= YrCC Z ii _B: $ -La aY 3•rh. Zz +,; s• -.34i -- Eli, I 7a -:L` 8L• -CAE_ . _ dap �x3 3: '4tl - .. ?a ya ;_ � 5 !_7P z S § \ !� § J 22; § F�a . K - ` Q% 6`5 ! ! , : |§ : G . a 22! mJ 2 -2 #g� ! ® ! G ; §j rl ©tai |t J # S j | \ \ - / -- k j§ • : � |/! ! , !•■ @ \ \ / / \ S� \ \ 5 B & g #g \j /}i��� uu \ �§ \ § � � � .: /§ \ Z \ \� | \} |/ \ \; /! \=£22� g { \\ /\ \�\ \� /| �0 Yellend Properties 73262 FL OeO nom swu 220 Laguna Hot. CA 92652 put 472 249` Mr Jim Bailey William Lyon Company 19 Cnrporate Plaza Newport Beach Calif. 92660 RECEIVED SEP 9 - 1985 THE WILLIAM LYON CO. Sao 6enaromo Cowl eki3lon September 3rd, 1985 Re: Victoria Station Storage Center. Dear Mr Bailey, At the request of Stuart Calder 1 have reviewad the preliminary plans for the facility propose: or Baseline Road in tho City of Rancho Cucamonga and find that the project as purpose] Is an excellent Ofization of this narrow parcel of property Over thr past 15 years the need for storage has increased as the the size of living qLartors Is mcluced Convenient month to month storage In a central location to a population base has proven to be a very necessary item in these times of Increasing costs. Ir order to determine the need in the proposed location I have considered the follcwmg parameters. A. Summary of conclusions. B. Analysis of the plans, desirability of the facility. C Population anticipated growth D. History of the Storage Industry E Success of R.V storage. F Analysis of demand F,ased on the research completed, I believe that the project as planned w.11 architectu ally add to the area, be successful, and serve the residences being built wtnln a 2 mile radius. Sincerely, ! Hand. hn A. SUMMARY 0.'- CONCLUSIONS The plans proposed offer a facility that will cater to self storage end recrettlonal vehicle tenants. The project as designed will offer a complete range of services catering to a broad range of tenants. The appearance of the project Is In keeping with the Victorlan theme of the nearby housing development which offers an excellent Identjty. The location on a major street is very desirable. While the current population is Ijw, the population and growth projected within a two mile radius will absorb the storage I.' and RV space provided. if development stays within the boundaries projected you cuu'd expoct the storage facility to rent up within a year and the RV stalls to rent up within 3 years. B. ANALYSIS OF PLANS, DESIRABILITY OF THE FACILITY. The subject property has a width of 176 feet, a depth of 1,031 feet, this Is a difficult parcel to utilize for many purposes. The property has an Edson easement on the West side, a railroad right of way to the North, and a third party property owner on the East. Any use of this properly must provide for the receipt of dralnage that comes under the rallreod to the North. The narrow property and the grade difference between front and rear would cause problems for many developments. Sewerage Is not readily available at the site, therefore, utilization of the property would have to be by septic tanks. The low sewerago demand of this use makes this a very desirable aspect of the project. The appearance of the project designed with a Victorian theme ties in well and will compliment the surrounding housing developments. This theme will present an excellent public Imago. The project contains approx 33,000 gross square fool of buildings that translate into about 28,000 square feet of storage space, approx 250 rental units In addition the project has a managers quarters and rental office which provides the security for the tenants stored Items. The project will feature a Honeywell lazer beam surveylance system allowing entrance only during office hours. The 263 RV storage spaces are segregated Into different sizes that will cater to a broad range of recreational vehirtes. In addition, the wash rack and sewer dump service will add user appeal. The protect will be perimeter fenced by 8 foot high walls measured from the exterior The east and west sides of the RV parking feature stalls covered vrith 10 foot clear carport roofs. The walls and roofs provided will protect the stored items from the winds, dust, ultraviolet rays and hot summer sun. Electrically controlled access gates will prohibit persons from entering the facility without first obtaining approval from the management office. This project provides a quality storage facility that caters well to the RV tenant. The addition of soli storage compliments the RV storage and broadens the range of tenants allowing Increased tenant serovices and presentation of product. Z) (' 3 C. POPULATION & ANTICIPATED GROVVTH The projoct is located in the center of a two mile ring that includes the VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY and the TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY. The rem2lnder of the 2 mile ring Includes the ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN the INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PI AN and one area not In the City. The population expeciod to be in place by 1986 is as follows-- Victoria community 1,700 housing units Terra Vista community 1,500 housing units Total units 3,200 housing units Using a ratio of 3.2 persons per house this anticipates 10,240 people In place by year end 1986. The population Increase for 1987 is as follows:- Victoria community i,1b0 housing units Terra Vista community 1,000 housing units Total Units 2,100 housing units Using a ratio of 3.2 persons per house this anticipates a further population Increase of 6,720 people for a total of 16,960 by year end 1967. The same growth is expected for 1988 which will bring the population total to 23,680 people. By 1995 these projects would be built out with 16,500 housing units. As the two projects refferred to are only portion of this two mile ring it crn be presumed that additional housing will be built adding to the population base. As this population base is established, support commercial and Industrial will be built The relationship to the Devore freeway further broadens the desireabiGty of this locatian. D6 D. HISTORY OF THE STORAGE INDUSTRY Credit for the beginnings of the modern personal storage service: must go to England. It all began when British banking !nstitutions were asked to safeguard valuables for clients embarking on extended voyages. Overcrowded vaults forced bankers to seek help from the moving (drayage) companies who had brought In these veluad possessions. These drayage companies procured storage spate in primitive lofts which were a little better than stables. In the 1950's, the original moving and storage pioneers devised the first warehouse specifically constructed for household goods and treasured personal items. The early storage facilities were 2 story structures where all packing etc. was done on the lower floor and private storage rooms were located on the second floor. This principal of storage followed for the next 60 years but the moving and storage warehouse grew into 4, 6 and 10 story structures with a freight slevator. Scme of the floors were open areas where the belong- ings were stacked and other floors had shelves, racks, etc., but the storage rooms were the major mathod of storage. Curing the 1950's, the storage industry faced with rising costs developed the palletized warehouse.a 20 foot high concrete tilt -up building where the tenant's goods were crated and stacked 3 high in wooden boxes; the boxes be- ing moved around with a forklift. This worked well when the storage involved long distance moving but was inconvenient and costly to the customer if the customer wanted to get to his belongings. In the mid 1960's, Texas saw the first self storage facilities and that proved immediately success'ul. Since that tire we have seen the development of these facilities throughout the United States. Canada, Australia and in Europe. -1- REASONS FOR THE SUCCCSS OF THE SELF STORAGE FACILITY The American Dreamt Everybody would tike to own their own business, the free enterprise system at its best. The desire of all people to im- prove is what makes us so transient. We move to a better growth area to start our own business or to get a better sob. We move to get a bigger, smeller, or better located home. The need for storage goes on. According to the National averaga, the American moves every 3 to 4 years; in Southern California the average is 2 8 years. Nationally, 20% of the population moves each year or about 40 mill an people. What do the doctors do with their records they neee to keep for an ex- cessive lergth of time when his rent is $ 1.25 per square foot monthly T Where do people store seasonal inventory 7 How do businesses expand without moving 7 Where does the traveling salesman receive shipments and store goods 7 Where does the home occupational person store their stock 7 How about the contractor who needs to store his equipment 7 A recent survey compiled by the largest door spring manufacturer in this area reports that 47% of the respondents used their garages for uses other than the storage of vehicles. These are only a few of the reasons mentioned that attribute to the stately success of the Self Storage Business. This is the perfect place; convenient and economical You put your own goods in and take your own goods out. With today's high cost of oviving, increased leisure tire. higher labor costs and the number of versatile how handymen still growing, we all want to do -it- ourselves and save. As we enjoy our recreation, acquire sporting equipment, motorcycles, dune buggies, etc., today we have nowhere in the apartment houses, trailer parks, townhouses and co- idaminiums or small homes to store excess personal items. In essence, again, we need the Self Storage Facility. -1- �s NATIONAL INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTICS It has been proven that because the American population moves often, is possessed by its possessions,any area will absorb 2 square feet of self storage space per capita. This 1s making average assumptions as to density, percentage of multi - family dwellings, etc. The most successful areas for storage have been the Sun Belt Areas, where people have more opportunity to be outdoors and own more recreational items. The Sun Belt extends from South- ern California to Florida. Areas that are known to absorb more than 2 square feet per person of population have some of the following characteristics: 1. Growth in industrial, commercial and housing units. 2. More than 30% of multi - family dwellings. 3. Many mobile home and condominium urits. 4. Large numbers of small businesses in multi- tenant industrial area. S. Locations close to recreation, boating, etc. 6 A history of transiency (information obtained from the telephone company). 7. tames and apartments that have carports in lieu of garages (or none at all). In California, there is to excess of 500 facilities and 5,000 facilities nationwide. There are probably 50 facilities under construction or mxlsting in Canada. These self storage facilities tend to be 1 and 2 story structures, how- ever, some 4 story units have been built and existing warehouses have been con- verted to self storage operations. The average facility has SOO units averaging 100 square feet in size. This overage size is decreasing. As far as saturation is concerned, Phoenix, Arizona, has 110 facilities with 4,500,000 square feet of storage space, a population of 1,300,C00 or an average -1- 'DY % 1. of 3.5 square feet per person of population. One four (4) mile radius area in Phoenix has 8 square feet of storage per person. This area was used be- cause the most precise figures are available. This density of storage in Phoenix is probably caused by the fact that the carport has replaced he garage. There are absolutely no reports o.' occupancies below 95: and corn facilities are to planning and under con- struction. The customer of a storage facility is a do- it-yourselfer, where the user of a regular moving and storage company is a person who wants service. The growth of the self storage business is enhanced by the high cost of labor and thu increase in leisure time. . 2 - D (. O TYPICAL SELF STORAGE FACILITIES The typical full service facility will have from 350 to 1000 storage units. The avarage of all facilities is 500 units and rising. The Storage Unit sizes are broken down into 5 different user categories which represent a different marketing need. / I ............ under 100 square feet 4 x 4 thru 6 x 12 f 2 ............ 100 - 150 square feet 9 x '2 rhru 9 x 16 1 3 ............ 150 - 250 square feet 9 K 10 thru 12 x 20 / 4 ............ 250 ano over 12 x 25 thru 16 x 30 5 ............ Recreational vehicle 9 x 16 thru 10 x 35 storage All facilities have built -in securiti which starts with design. A central access point Past the office and caretaker's residence is the basis of control of all tenants. To avoid intrusion, perimeter buildings or fencing is d mast Nationat.y, the majority of facilities have regular business hours with the facility closed during the evening hours. A shorter business day is general for Sunday operation. The majority of facilities are single story structures, however, a large number have 2 storied one or two tuildings with the smaller units located on the second Mor. This has not proven to be a negativa rental feature as lo- cation is the number one factor for success. Several four story structures have been built and other existing buildings up to 10 stories to height have been converted successfully. (Host existing structures owned by roving com- panies are culti- story). -1- ,;)lo 7 Having and storage companies are converting their building to offer the self storage amenities where possible. To illustrate the mix of rental sizes we show the following average for all 10 Linkletter Properties: Category / 1 .................... 2,108 units Category 1 2 .................... 1,060 units 1 Category 1 3 .................... 418 units Category f 4 .................... 151 units Category f 5 ......... .......... 281 units It is possible through mix to have facilities std_ by side that do not compete, this is similar to Industrial uses, office uses, apartments, etc. Linkletter Properties always builds a higher percentage of larger units than other full service facilities; we have proven that this has promoted long - evity of tenancies and reduced deliquencies. Rentals are paid monthly in advance with a graduated deposit from 5 15 to S 45 depending on Ot!-e rental rate. We offer discounts for 6 month rentals and 271 of our tenants pay 6 months in advance! There are no other costs to our self storage tenant although other operators have charged cleaning deposits. The .rst self storage facilities were very unattractive in design but the requirements of good planning and design have improved the visual appear- s anc.: greatly by turning all buildings in from the street, adding the care- ' taker's residence and office as an architectural design feature, the end result is a facility that presents a good ieage to a community. It is import- ant to use creative thinking and improve the appearance and function without adding to cost in these inflationary times. - 2 - a %v E. SUCCESS OF AV STORAGE As housing, and the lots homes are built on become smaller, we hava less and less space for the recreational Items in our life. Housing communities and cities are becoming Increasingly concerned about the enviroment , they are enact'ng ordinances that prohibit parking of any vehicle on the street, in front yards or placos t,,.. screened from the public view. In the past, the majority of the RV storage has been provided In a crude, manner with not a lot of thought given to tenant services. As the facilities are more common we can expect the facilitates to improve In quality. Raman rates have always been very low, tharefore, with todays high coal of land olus the improvements required by the city the returns were such that the Investment opportunity was non existent. In order to provide a fadlity that caters to the tenant needs, allowing axess %vith security, the provision of a resident manager as proposed In the subject p.oject I;. a desirable feature. The add lion of self storage will no doubt broaden the to cant base assisting the success of the project. The population base does not currently exist to support this facility, however, as houses are built the demand will grow. Ultimately the 16,500 projected housing units will create the demand necessary. Rental rates will play a large part In the success of the project, it could be expected that the rental rates Ine 1.y, charged will need to be at the low end of the scale. D -7/ F. ANALYIS OF DEMAND In reviewing the history of storage we noted that any area can absorb of 2 square feet of storage per person of population. Information Is now surfacing which tends to establishing the maximum square feet of mini- storage that can be built Ina given area is 4 square feet of storage ,ar reson of population. This is proven by the fact that Phoenix now has approx. 4 squa, s feet of storage per person of population and the growth of mini storage over the last 3 years Is paralleling the population Increase. Areas within the Phoenix market where more than 4 square feet of space were bullt are In in overbuilt situation. San Bemadino, a neighboring city was In an overbuilt situation as of October 1984. They had 4.1 square feet of storage per person of population built with and an occupancy rate of 75 %. It our opinion due to the lack of density in the San Bemadino area it will be quite a while before they reach 95% occupancy. By comparison, dense areas of Los Angeles have 400,000 people in the 5 mile radius and they have absorbed In excess of 4 square feet of storage. Using the above Information we anticipate that the demographic area within 2 miles of this project will absorb 3 to 4 square feet of storage per person of l!/ population. Using the low of 3 square feel and a population of 10,240 pecple by year and 1986 we project a need for 30.720 sq. ft. of storage. This Is more than the storge space being provided by this project. Future growth will require more storage. As development of self storage tends to parallel the population growth we find that we cater more and more to short term tenants. This factor Increases the rent up period because of the higher terminator. rate. It could be expected that this project would fill up at a rate of 40 units per month or 4,000 sq. tt There is no definite history 'or the demand of RV storage as it relates to a specific population, however, the rental rate charged and the type of facility provided has a large Impact on the success of a project. We would anticipate that with proper promotion and continued growth, the RV stalls could fill up within 3 years. The population at year end 1988 is expected to be 23,680 or 7,400 housing units. If this projection of demand is correct It would show the proposed facility caters to the number of homes being built in the Victoria Planned Community over the next 10 years. d 7a JOHN YELLAND - QUALIFICATIONS His experience dates from 1969 when he constructed the first self storage facility In Phoenix, Arizona. He also developed and bull three other commercial projects In that city. In 1972 he joined Unkleher Properties. As Vice President and General Manager he developed multi- tenant Industrial and self storage facilities. He was responsible for all phases of development which covered, land acquisition through construction and property management. During his seven years with Unkletter Properties, the staff tripled in the property management and construction divisions. He was a general partner In all ventures. Nineteen projects, totaling 1.2 million square feet of rental space , were built. Three of them ware completed in partnership with Genstar of Canada and two with Bekins Moving and Storage. The success of these projects was unprecedented. In April of 1979, he formed Yelland Properties to continue those development activities. Land was purchased In three locations for future speculation and development. Included in these acquisitions was land for a 60 acre office Industrial park in Dallas. Texas, a 55,000 square foot multi- tenant industrial project and a 36,000 square foot shopping center In 1980 a 24,000 square foot Sears distribution building In Long Beach was purchased and converted Into a two story, sell storage facility. This successful project has 35,000 square feat of rental space. He Is currently the managing partner of three new projects. Trabuco Self Storage which contains 65,000 square feel of rental space, opened January 1085 in El Toro, California. Phase two will add an additional 34,000 square feet of space. The second project, Anaheim Self Storage, opened in August 1985. It contains 50,000 square feet of rental space. The third project, Tustin Self Storage, has 60,000 square feet of rental space and is under construction. Yelland Properties Is the managing partner for all projects that he participates In. He is a general contractor with the State of California and has been active In the Self Storage Association since 1975 having been the president and a director of region 2 He has lectured at numerous gatherings of the Self Storage Association. His In depth research of tho self storage business has provided him with opportunities to consult in distant places of the United States,and to Australia and New Zealand. 2-73 ORDINANCE H0. 287 M ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AM0IDHENT 85 -01, TO MODIFY THE COMMUNIIY PLAN TIZT TO ALLOY A RFCREATIORAL VSC_CLE STORAGE LOT 1ITH MINI - WAREHOUSE IN THE tEDIUM -HIGH (MB) OR HIGH (80 LAND USE CATWORY, AND TO ALLOY ITS OPERATION ON A COMMERCIAL, FOR RENT BASIS. OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. Ibe City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamnga, California. does ordain as follows: 1tECTION It The City Council hereby finds and determines the f of loving: A. That the Planning Commissioo of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, following a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed by 1". recommends the Comstaity Plan tazt amendment hereinafter descrlbcd, and this City Council ban held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by I" and duly heard and considered said recommendation. B. That this Comm uLty Plan text amendment is consistent vith the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. That this Community Plan text amendment is consistent vith the original intent of the Victoria Planned Community. D. This Community Plan text amendment rill have no significant environmental impact as promised in the Negative Declaration filed beraln. SECTION 2, The Community Plan text of the Victoria Planned Community is hereby amended to read as follow: A. Condition t5 of "General" of Resolution go, 81 -37 to read as follows: "Recreational Vehicle storage shLll be provided vithin each residential lead use category of Lw, Low Medium. and Medium for 251 of the lots or units contained vithia those lots vithin the Victoria Planned Community. IF ■tore&* shall be provided within the bomadaries of the Victoria Planned Community. The percent of recreational vehicle storage spaces shall be revised on an annual basis and may be modified by the Planning Commission." D% 7 B. Condition !6 of %e_neral. of Resolution No. 81 -37 to read an follwal "Recreational Vehicle Storage" shall not be permitted in the Mediva-High or High land use category "less within a designated lA •t"&&@ lot, sod @ball be restricted by CC & R'■ subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. Recreational vahicle storage lots may be permitted within the boundaries of the Victoria planed Comity sabject to the granting of a Conditional Use permit by the Flemming Commission. prior to approving a COP for a N storage lot, the planning Commission shall ale the follwing findings: 1. ?bet the size and configuration of the proposed gV storage lot is adegonte for the plammed development. 2. That the location of the proposed facility is adjacent to a primary circulation route to permit rasoaable access to the facility without resulting in negative impacts for r mounding properties. 3. That the proposed RV atorage lot in compatible with existing euaomading uses, or with those further uses permitted in the lad use designations. 4. That the proposed RV storage lot would not be detrimental to and result in significant negative impacts for surrounding properties, rroperty osuers, sad /or residents. S. That the total number of IV spaces provided, whether as spaces on mm individeal lot basis or within a gV storage lot, does act erce" more than 251 of the total number of dwelling writs is the Low. LorMadium, and Mediae lend sue categories. Nisi- ware►waing may be permitted wben in conjunction with am lh storage lot developed is coaforance to the above rsferasecd requireassts. 7S A mini- sare►wse shall be defined as a structure, or growp of strottares, providirj enclosed and locked compartments for the dead storage of customer goods ant wares where Ind vUsal lockers " stalls are rested not to differ,mt tomato for strra2e. As with the primary lA otorage lot, a mini- wus►wu facility shall be designed to pdmssily cater to the needs of the residents of the Victoria Pleased Community. 2. IT storage lots when developed with accessory mini- worabwae shall conform to the following development standards: a. The adnims area of a lot for a dni- warabwse facility shall be 2 acres. b. The sandmen building beight shall be 2 stories or 25 feet, except that any building or portion of a building within 25 feet of the front or street aids setback shall have a maximum height of one -stary or 10 feat. C. Only one point of ingress and egress shall be allowed, "lees another is required by the Firs Depsstmaat. Al. driveways shall be radius type, and shall have an unobstructed length of 40 feet from the curb to present vehicles and trailers from interfering with traffic flow in the street. d. we (2) covered parking spaces shall be provided adjacent to the manger's residence/office. In addition, ooe (1) parking apace for every 100000 square feat of gross floor "sea. " a minimum of three (3) parking spaces for facilities of less than 30,000 pure feet of gross floor area, shall bu located adjacent to the office for the use of prospective clients. Required puking shall be rested or used for vehicular storage. a. Building materials end treatment shall complement those existing in the surrounding area. f. tdtdoor storage area shall be permanently screened so as not to be visible iron the public right -cf-way or from adjacent late. D7� g. All utilities •hall be underground. no water, gun 'or electric service shall be Provided to the individual units. b. eu -sice, 24 -boor management shall be provided. 1. The Planning Ccacdsvion shall establish boors of operatior as a Coalition of Approval for any Coaditional Use Permit granted for a BY storage /aioi-varahouse facility. f>BCT10H 9: She Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clark shall cause the same to be published vithin fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in jhB, Daly Report. a neuspaPer of general Circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and cir-uldted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this � fay of e, 19►. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon U. Mikels, 1layor ATTEST: Beverly A. Autbelat, City Clerk I, BEVERLY A. AUTREIBT, CITr CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance vas introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 19tb day of February, 1986, and vas finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the a day of e, 19se. d77 ORDINANCE E0. 288 A'1 ORDINANCE CALIPORB IA.CI APPROVING ILANF TUB AMENDMENT yIO RANCHO COCAMCNGA, CITY OF ANBPXATIOR A3D DEVELOYy.YNT A6REMON DEVELOPMENT 88COMPANY- RANCHO CUCAMONGA AN LARDS C MP.1NY. AND MA&LNOR0OGH KAUFMAN Ago BROAD PROPERTIES LOCATED DEVgLOPHERT CONPORATIOR RELATIVE 'Cfl BETWEEN TEE EXTENSION OP RAND AB®WEM THE ICEXTENSION 880F ON THE NORTH AND SCOTS, ROCHESTER ABD MILLIKEN- 15L- -01GTHROUGH 0307 O8. 10-13. E 225- 141 -08, 12 -19; W NEBEAS, the City is a )arty to that cartel* Annamlti0n Agreement, dated Dacemb er 19. 1984. end ran Instrument 'r the official Records of Sea Bernardino dated ce March 19 1985 as Instrument Foe 85 -049652 (the "An°aaatio* Agreement'); and M 0e6EAS, the city 1s a party to that certain Development Agreement. dated March 20. 1985, and 19B5acceded l °etru.cocffNoS X185 -074369 (the • "Dovel opment Record. of County on March 29, Agreement "); and Y@:REA.S. the Plaaniag Commission recommaads that the Annexation Agreeaent Pod Devalopmeot Agreement be amended as hereinafter set forth- NOW I THEREFORE- the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, does ordain as follovst to ea1jgS 1; That amendment ahicbt is attacuedi to this Ordinance as Agreement.! a true and correct ropy reference, hereby is apptwed and the Exhibit "C" ame. incorporated herein by Mayor and City Clark hereby are authorised to execute said aaandmenc on babel of the City of Rancbo Cucamonga. The mayor shall sib* this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the came to s titer its Passage at least cote 1* Ih6 be published vithic fifteen (15) day Macho Cucamonga. D i R sort, a uevapsper of general circulat of ion pouf Meal in the City Ontario, California, sad circulated in the City California. The Mayor f*. al: sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the sae to arrays 'free Lou published in tbanCity '1312 f be published �icbin fifteen (15) y Rancho Cucamonga, tIr R.Rul, • newspaper circulated in the City of Ontario, Califotni a. California. ORDINANCE 80. 21 -8 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE GIFT OF RMCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CERTAIN SECTIONS OF CRAFTER 5.04 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAIDIBC TO BUSINESS LICENSES. The City Council of Cho City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordair as follont SECTION ION Is Section 5.04.020A of the Rancho Cucamoaga Munieipal Code Is hereby amended to read, in words and figures as follmet "A. 'Business' means and includes professions, trades, occupations and every other kind of calling carried on for profit or livelihood whether or not a profit or livelihood is earned thereby." SECTION 2t Section 5.04.0208 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures as follows: "8. 'Gross payre'l' shall include all salaries of moors, officers, partners, agents, and imployeas of the company based at that location in the city for the year immediately pretending any license application or reneval. 'Salary' shall mean wages, coa.inions, bonuses or other money payment of any kind vbieL is received from or given credit for by his employer. It shall not include travel expenses incurred in the business of the taployar and reicbursed by the employer." SECTION 'it Section 5.04.020 of tbo Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a acv Section 5.04.0208 to be read, in words and figures, as follmst "H. 'Starting data' as used in this chapter means that date when a newly established business first commences its operation." SECTION 41 Sae tion 5.0e.14U of the Rancho C..eamonga Municipal Code Is hereby amended to read, is words and figures, as follows "5,04.140 Lieesa t .e" — t,vneet A. Unless otherwise specifically provided, after payment of the initial license tax, all annual lieease taxes provided in this chapter shall be due and payable can year from the initial starting date and on such date each year thereafter. "B. :xcept as otherwise provided, liceace taxas other than annual shall be due and payable as follwat Ordinance 21 —B Page 2 "I. Monthly. Monthly license taxes, on the first day of each sad every swath; "2. Weekly. Vaekly license taxes, in advance on Monday of each we dc; and, "3. Daily. Daily license taxes, in advance each day." SECTION N: Section 5.04.150 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures an follows: "5.04.I51 Gie Tares — Penel tier for dalineu n i For failure to pay a license tax when due, the collector shall add a penalty of fifty percent (502) of such license tc thirty (30) days after the due date thereof." SECTION t.: Section 5.04.280 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures as follovet "c.nA e&n c____ ---- I____ _ ._ _ m:seen aneoue. rvery person who engages in a retail or wholesale or other busioess within the city, which business is cot otherwise classified in this chapter. shall pay a license tax for each year based on the folloriog: "A. Tvanty —three dollars for the first twenty —five thousaod dol.ars of gross receipts. "B. If applicable, an additional sixty cents per thousand dollars or portion thereof will be added to the above for the next aeveoty —five thousand dollars of gross receipts of the business. "C. If applicable, an additional thirty cents per thousand dollars or portion thereof will be added to the above for the next four hundred thousand dollars of gross receipts. "D. If applicable, an addition fifteen cents per thousand dolls —a or portion thereof will be added to the above for may &amour of gross receipta ever five hundred tbousaud dollars." SECTION y: Section 5.04.290A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: �$J Ordinance 21 -5 Page 3 "A. Every parson who engages in a professional or aeni- professional and similar businesser within tbo city, which business is not othervias classified in this chapter, shall pay a license tar for each year based on the following: "1. 'Twenty -three dollars for the first twenty -five thousand dollars of gross receipts. "2. If applicable, an add.cional one dollar and twenty cents per thousand dollars at portion thereof will be added to the above for the next seveaty-five thousand dollars of gcosa receipts of the business. "3. If applicable, an additional fifty cents per thousand dollars or portion thereof will be added to the above for the nest four hundred thousand dollars of gross receipts. "4. If applicable, an additional twenty cents per tboosand dollars or portion thereof will be added to the above for any amount of gross receipts wet five hundred thousand dollars. "5. In the case of real estate brokers maintalticg an office within .be city, all real estate commissions will be included when reporting the gross receipts of the business except such portion of gross receipt* reflecting sales made of real property out of the city where the outside sales are required to be reported and bvsines• license paid thereoa to another community. In the case of real estate brokers maintaining as office within the city, gross receipts shall not be reduced because of any compensation paid, directly or indirectly, to a real estate salesperson licensed under such broker. In the case of real estate brokers not maintaining an office within the city only real estate salesmen's commissions from sales of real property within the city shall be reported as gross receipts." SECTIO"-. Section 5.04.310A of the lirncba Cucamonga Municipal Code Is hereby amended to read, in words and figures an follows: "A. Every person who engages in the above classification of businesses, which business is Oct othervias classified in this ebapter shall pay a license tax for each year based on the follwingt "1. A baoe tar of twenty dollars wilt y in all ease@. "2. Is. addition, ninety cents per thousand dollars will be added to the base tar Far aL, first one hundred thousand dollars of gross receipts of the business during tLa year. "3. If applicable, an additional forty cents per thousand dollars will be added to the above for the next sir hundred fifty thousand dollars of gross receipts of the business. SM Ordinance No. 21 —B Page 4 "4. If applicable, an additional twenty —five cents per thousand dollars will be added to the above for any amount of groas receipts war seven hundred fifty thousand dollars of gross receipts." SECTION 9: Section 5.04.310C of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby &waded to tea,, in words and figures, as follws: "C. Rental@ shall include hotels, motels, apartments, apartment courts, roomingbouses, duplexes, triplexes. trailer courts, mobile home parks, and similar rental units having four or more units, spaces or rooms on contiguous proparry in the city. In the "eat of the sale of any property described in this subsea Lion, the holder of a license therefor may apply for a refund of the tax for any full quarter year remaining to the end of the tax year on condition that the buyer shall have paid the license tax for the quarter year in which the sale was completed and for the balance of the tax year including any penalties due." SECTION 10: Section 5.04.320A of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words ea6 figures, as follows: "A. Every person, not having a fixed ploco of business within the City, who delivers goodsb wares, or merchandise by the use of vehicles in the City shall pay a license tax for each year based on the following: "I. A base tax of thirty —six dollars shall apply in all cases. "2. In addition, sixty cents per thousand dollars will be add,,d to the base tax for any gross receipts in wxcess of ten thousand dollars resulting from sales in the City from all vehicles, routes, ate., for a tax year." SECTION 11: Section 5.04.340A of the Rancho Cucamoaga Municipal Code is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as follows: "A. Every person acting in the City as a "nufacturer, processors fabricator, administrative headquarters or warehouse only shall pay a license tax for each year based an the following: "1. A base tax of recut dollars will apply in all cases. "2. In addition, sixty cants per thousand dollars vil: be added to the base tax for the first one hundred thousand dollars of gross payroll of the business during the tax year. "3. If applicable, on additional twenty —five cents per thousand dollars will be added to the above for the next nine hundred thousand dollars of gross payroll of the business. "4. If applicable, an additional ten cents per thousand dollars will be added to the above for any amount of gross payroll war one million dollars provided that the maxfaus license fee based on payroll shall be one thousand dollars annually." Ordinance No. 21 -B Page 5 R =d,12s She City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or vord of this ordinance b„ rendered or declared Invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections paragraphs. seuleeces, and vords of this ordinance .ball remain in full force sad effect. She Mayor shall sign this Ordinauce and the City Clark shall cause the same to be published vilbia fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in ZhD Da11v Deport, a newspaper of geraral circulation published In the City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of Al SS t SOEst ABSEMIs Jon D. Mikels, Mayor ATrESis Beverly A. Authulet, City Clerk Bys Debra Adams, Deputy I. BEVERLY A. ADIBELET. CITY CLERK of tho City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance vas introduced at a regular meeting o• ' I Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on lbe 19th day of February, it , and vu finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hold on the '* day of *. 19* *. Executed this * day of *, 19** at Ranebo Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Autbalet, City Clark Bys Debra Adams. Deputy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: N.irch 5, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: The Planning Commission BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner itn 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT a - N u N - amen ment to t o rev s105 w f cat ons - Section 17.02.0708, 11.02.O10C; Conditional Use Permit Section 17.040.030H; and Development Review Section 17.06.0100, 17.06.020G of the Municipal Coee regarding language additions and changes. BACKGROUND: Attached for your review are Exhibit -A" and •B°, showing the proposed amendments to the Sections of the Code as presented to you by staff at the last 7ebruary 5, 1986, Council meeting. The Planning Comm.ssion would like to take this opportunity to reiterate the need for the proposed amendments to the following sections of the Code. A. Revisions Modifications Sec. 17.02.0108 and 17.02.0700: The My Co unc quest on t e ne to amen the Code to tighten up the process, such as there are not many reapplications for revisions and modifications Over the past few years there has been an aggressive attempt by the Planning Commission to make policies and intent clear as well as to avoid unnecessary and nonproductive procedures. Ile are, therefore, calling the following to your attention. The Planning Commission believes it has recognized a loophole within the current Development Review Process which creates the opportunity for a cyclical problem. Under the current wording, a developer who falls to exercise the appeal process, could repeatedly - eapply to eliminate, amend, or modify certain portions of the Conditions of Approval of a project. Even after the final action has been made by the City Council, the developer can still reapply for review. This cyclical process could be never ending and the Planning Commission and /or the City Council could be reviewing over and over again, certain Conditions of Approval, requirements of improvements such as design elements, materials, and public improvements. «W CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Development Code Amendment 85 -03 March 5, 1986 Page f2 The proposed amendment would add languages to clarify the Intent of the code. The applicant could srill exercise the reapplication and the appeal process; however, when the final decision making body has rejected the substance of the proposed revision or modifleatlou, it would prohibit an applicant from reapplying within a period of one year. By allow;ng special treatment to those who would take advantage of loopholes, we are •warding appeals and being punitive to those developers attempt to comply with and abide by the ,;ishe- of th Council and Commission. The proposed language changes would not, we believe, increase legislative powers, but simply make clear the intent of the Code. We further believe that this clarification of intent would be to the best interest of the City and respectfully request your approval. B. New A litations Foltowtn Denial Sections 17.04.030H In regard to the new app icato T011owing denial of a project, minor language changes are necessary to correct a typographical error as shown in Exhibit •A.. 11. RECOVENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City ounci approve Development Code Amendment 85 -03, through the adoption of the attached Ordinance and issuance of a Negative Declaration. sp tfuhhy�(su�bm�itted � � /ISin.�/�x Cc�Jw"`i Dennis L. Stout Chairman of the Planning Commission OS:NF:cv Attachments: City Council Staff Report - February 5, 1986 Exhibit •A• - Proposed Amendments Exhibit '0' - Graphic Illustration of Processing Cycle Ordinance approving the Development Code Amendment DOs CI N EXHIBIT A Section 17.0? Revisions /Modifications Section 17.02.0708 8. Major Revisions Coission. Revisions or modifications to site plans, gra ng p ans, mman scape pans, or architectural plans which are not considered minor as described in the p.evious section, shall be considered a major revision. Also, any request for a change in conditions of approval shall be considered a major revision. Major revisions shall be processed through the same approval procedure and authority which granted the original approval. The applicant requesting such revisions shall be required to supply any necessary plans, as deemed appropriate by the City Planner, rnd pay necessary fees to cover the review procedure. The decision of the approval authority shall be final unless appealed to accordance with Section 17.02.080. Foil awin the denial of a M or (�. Revisions Application no licatton or a same or su stantia y t he Yj setae revis eAs aTl be filed wi[hTn one year from a ate of denial. Section 17.02.070C C. Reconsideration of Revision /lbdificatlon. fb application for a revision or�mo modification sna a ac:ep or TMug within one year from the date of any approval if the final decision making body rejected the substance of the proposed revision or modification in the 1rocess of granting that approval. Section 17.04 Conditional Use Permit Section 17.04U.030H New Applications Following Denial H. New A itcat tons Foilowin Dental or Revocation. Following the dental or revacat ono a on t pna Use arm it application, no application for a Conditional Use Permit for the same or substantially the sari use of the same of substantially the same site shall be filed within one year from u the date of denial or revocation Section 17.06 Development Review Section 17.060.010E New Applications Following Denial G\ lieew lications Following_ Denial. Following the denial of a Development evR iew appl elation, no a� for the same or substantially the same use on the same or substentially the same site shall be filed within one yearTrom the date of dental. Section 17.060.020G New Applications Following Denial G. New A lications Fol�dsec ntal. Following the denial of a Minor eve opment ev ew n, no application for the same or substantially the sa the same or substantlally the same site shall be filed within rom the date of dental. D, E-6 AMVt:IA , <..v<., PE1100 PROJEtt.: :hy,> hfODlflfAlWV Nt� �.L�"" rt�.it. ND DWAUR tN SUN hur PG m" 0 APPEAL G G AtQl�Cf ANWAL at 1011UIEW 'PHIAL CITY Or rmo -vd 26-03 RANCHO CUCAMO \GA Triu, PLANNING DIVISON EXHmrr- , satt & D.87 c ^�c ORDINANCE 110. —ftz : d � AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 85 -03 AMENDING TITLE 17, REVISIONS /MODIFICATIONS SECTION 17.020.0708 AND 17.020.070C, AND NEW APPLICATIONS FOLLOWING DENIAL OF SECTIONS 17.040.030H, 17.060.010G AND 17.060.02DG OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, dces ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 17.02.0708 - Revisions /Modifications is hereby amended to read as follows B. Major Revisions - Commission. Revisions or modifications to site pans, grading pans, landscape plans, or architectural plans which are not considered minor as described in the previous section, shall be considered a major revision. Also, any request for a change to conditions of approval shall be considered a major revision. Major revisions shall be processed through the same approval procedure and authority which granted the o- iginal approval. The applicant requesting such revisions shall be required to supply any necessary plans, as deemed appropriate by the City Planner, and pay necessary fees to cover the review procedure. The decision of the approval authority shall be final unless appealed in accordance with Section 17.02.080. Following the denial of a IWor Revisions App lice oti n, no a I ca on or a same or su stool a e same rev son s is be Viled within one year trom t o date of denial. SECTION 2: Section 17.020.070C - Revisions /Modifications is hereby added to rem as fllows: C. Reconsideration of Revlslon Modification. No application for a rev s on or mod c t ion shall be accepted for filing within one year from the date of any approval If the final decision making body rejected the substance of the proposed revision or modification in the process of granting that approval. SECTION 3: Section 17 040.30 - Conditional Use Permit is hereby amended tc rem --as— follows: H. flew Applications Following Denial or Revocation. rollowing the denial or revocation of a Condit one al Use Permit application, no application for a Conditional Use Permit fcr the same or substantially the same use of the same on substantially the same site shall be filed within one bear from the date of denial or revocation. ffh- Ordinance No. P2- 5- 01 -0,— I Page 2 Z I SECTION 4: Section 17.060.01OG and Section 17.060.02OG are hereby amended as�ol o' .- Section 17.060.010 G. New A ttcattons Followin Denial Following the denial of a se- ve opment ev ew application, no application for the same or substantially the same use on the same or substartial'; the same site shall be filed — within one year from the date of denial. Section 17.060.020 G. New Applications Follow'! Denial. Fo lowing the denial o a Minor eve opmen eview aDP ication, no application for the same or substantially the same use on the same or substantially the same site shall be filed within one year from the date of denial. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of ntar o, a ifornia, and circulated to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES ABSENT: ATTEST: every A. Authelet. City Clerk Jon D. MiFeTs—.—Way®r I ' — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAWNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March S. 1986 uj TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner "Y: Nancy Fang, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC P'AN AMENDMENT 85 -05 - CITY OF RANCHO CU[ ONGA - An amendment L0 industrial Area specific Pan to add Research 6 Development /Office use to Haven Avenue Overlay District I. BACKGROUND: The City Council, at its regular meeting of January 1IF 19 ?6-.—held a public hearing and directed staff to notify all prope -ty owners wito'n the Haven Avenue Overlay District regarding the Proposed amendmen; and continued it to this meeting. Copies of the staff report and p- oposed Ordinance were sent out on January c9, 1986 to those property owners as listed in the attachment. Staff has not received any comments to date. At the January 15 Council meeting, Mr. Dan Richards of Stephen Daniels comvercial brokerage firm raised concern that allowing Research d Development /Office use within Haven Avenue Overlay District would adversely impact the land values along Haven Avenue. He stated that R b O /Office use could include facilities he believed would be contrary to the goals of the Overlay District. However, ttie City Planner, stated that there are specific and adequate design guidelines, policies and standards in the Haven Avenue Overlay District to prevent such adverse impact. The City Council continued the public hearing and first reading of the proposed Ordinance in order to provide opportunity for all property owners within the Overlay District to comment on the proposed amendment. II. RECOMMENDATION: City Council conduct the public hearing, receive pubTT n-1 put and consider the Planning Commission's recommended approval of the Industrial Specif.c Plan Amendment as presented If the City Council concurs with the Planning Commission's recommendation issuance of a Negativ -Y Declaration ant' adoption o` the attached Ordinance would be approp•iate. Repso3tfully su ted, Brad Buller City Planner aid CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ISP Amendment 85-05 - City of Rancho Cucamonga March 5, 1986 Pago 2 Attaclenents• Letter to Property Owners and List of Property Owners within Haven Avenue Overlay District City Council Report, January 15, 1986 Ordinance Approving the Industrial Specific Plan Amendment The following letter was sent to the attached list a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C � •.a..lee D JUh.b Chu" J. B."d D hOny Rlne On Rkhvd Jl. Dahl r mtla3 ud'm January 29, 1986 SUBJECT: Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 85 -05 Dear Property Owner: The City Council has directed staff to notify property owners within the Haven Avenue Overlay District of the proposed Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 85 -05. This amendment would add research and development /office use as a permitted use within the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The City Council has continued the public hearing and first reading of the proposed ordinance to the March 5, 1986, agenda, in order to prnvlde ample opportunity for property owners to comment upon the proposed amendment. If you should have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, at (714) 989 -1861. Sincerely, OC:cv Attachment ID 9.� 9320 RASEUNE ROAD. SUITE C . POSTOMCES03907 • RANCIIOLC 'CA3103CA.CALIFOL %IAII770. (71419a}1871 209 - 092 -04 Plaza de la Mancha, Ltd. c/o TMI Corp. P.O. Box 2500 Newport Beach, CA. 92660 209 - 242 -02 David & Lynn Jenner 9669 Tryon Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 209 - 242 -03 Albert Morales 10463 8th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 209 - 242 -04 Jesus Perez 10469 8th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 209 - 143 -02 Allyn Scheu P.O. Box 275 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 209 - 411 -01 Jerry Neely Ellwin Ashw111 91730 1805 E. Garry Street, #110 Santa Ana, CA 92705 209- 411 -02 Glaser Development Co. C/o Herbert Glaser 91730 924 Westwood Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90024 209- 411 -14 Nina Mandala 8524 Redhill Country Club 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 209 - 242 -05 Frank 6 Helen Whitehead 8397 Orchard Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 2C9- 242 -06 Pedro Martinez 832 N. J. St. San Bernardino, CA 92411 209 - 242 -07 Paul Chagolla Sally Lopez 10489 8th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 209 - 251 -05 James & Susan Ogilvie 4601 Annaway Drive Edina, MI 55436 209 - 251 -11 KVL 8978 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 209- 411 -15 The Second PC Group C/o Pacific Scene Inc. 1003 Cooley Drive Colton, CA 92324 210- 072 -06, 11 Carol & Victor Buccola 16979 Edgewater Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92649 210 - 081 -01, 02, 03 Church of Latter Day Saints 50 E. North Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84150 210 - 081 -13 Haven industrial Park Ltd. 500 S. Sepulveda Blvd. Suite 310 Los Angeles, CA 90049 210 - 081 -14 Haven Building Materials, inc. 9393 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 a93 208- 341 -15, 16 L09- 142 -16 Sero Amusement Co. Haven IA Limited Jafan Corporation 370 Rowland 1615 Cordova Street Covina, CA 91723 Los Angeles, CA 90007 208- 351 -48, 49, 50 209 - 142 -17 Rancho Cucamonga Business Park Equities Michael Patz 8409 Utica Avaenue Gary Braaksma Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 2101 Emery Avenue La Habra, CA 90631 208 - 351 -32 209 - 142 -17 County of San Bernardino Michael Patz 325 E. "C" Street Gary Braaksma Ontario, CA 91764 2101 Emery Avenue _ La Habra, CA 90631 208 - 622 -27 209 - 142 -18 K -Mart Corp. Raveewan Kanokvechayant Bin K Bhislt Mararabiromya Crvtna, CA 91722 855 N. 25th Street Upland, CA 91786 108- 622 -28 209 - 142 -27, 28, 29 Edward & Diana Flaherty Haven Business Center 3516 Rancho Del Monica 359 San Miguel Covina, CA 91724 Newport Beach, CA 92660 208- 62 ? -34 209- 142 -30, 31 Oaon Corporation Jersey Business Center 4350 Von Kaman, Suite 100 359 San Miguel Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach, CA 92660 208 - 622 -35 Stephen Daniels 9333 Base Line Road, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 208 - 622 -36 The Strand Companies 145 Del Mar Avenue Berkeley, CA 94708 208 - 622 -37 James P. Previti Donald Rosenthal 9333 Base Line Road, Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 208 - 622 -38 Civic Lenter Plaza Associates 9513 Business Center Drive, Suite H Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91130 a9V 209- 142 -32 Larry E Beck 6312 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 209 - 131 -01 Donald & Suzanne Halstead 1516 Shirlmar Avenue San Dimas, CA 91773 209- 131 -02 Cucamonga Pioneer Vineyard Assoc 8812 Haven Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 209 -143 -01 County of San Bernardino 325 E. "Co Street Ontario, CA 91764 209 - 251 -12 210- 081 -15 Martin Marietta Corp. James & Michele Smirl 1998 N. Arrowhead c/o Pacific Commercial Brokerage San Bernardino, CA 92406 9620 7th Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 209 - 401 -01, 13 210- 081 -16 A.H. Reiter Bevel. Co. Church of Jesus Christ of LOS c/o Henry Reiter 57 W S Temple, Suite 780 3188 Pullman Street Salt Lake City, Utah A4101 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 209- 262 -17, 18, 19, 20 210 - 381 -01 Rancho Associates William & Ann Dale c/o Mission Equity 9223 Archibald Avenue, Suite K 27405 Puerta Real, Suite 300 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 210 - 381 -22, 23 210- 391 -01, 02, 03, 07 & 08 Rancho Cucamonga Business Park P.O. Box C -19560 Irvine, CA 97713 2 95 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 15, 1986 rial 1977 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - Y 0 11 10N - An amendment to ndustr a area pee c an to add Research & Development /Office use to Haven Avenue Overlay District. I. BACKGROUND: Last August 21, 1985, the City Council amended the n ustr a Specific Plan to define and add Research & Development /Office and Research & Development /Light Manufacturing uses to the designated subareas. The purpose of tonight's action is to to add Research and Development / Jffice use to the Haven Avenue Overlay District. The Planning Commission at its regular meeting of November 27. 1985, held a public hearing and recommended approval of such amendment. Attached "or your review 1s Planning Commission staff report and minutes that fully describe the proposed amendment. 11, CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been acvertlsed as a public hearing n _ e a v eport newspaper. I11. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the ndustr - pec lfic Plan Amendment as presented. If the City Council concurs, issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the attached ordinance would be appropriate. R ctfully s to Brad Buller City Planner BB:NF:ko Attachments: Plannng Commission Minutes and Staff Report, November 27, 1985 Planning Commission Resolution of Approval Ordinance Approving the Inoustrial Specific Plan Amendment a9� C J. ENYIRONIfNTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDw —NT 85 -05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Industrial Arsa Specific Plan to add research and development /office use to Haven Avenue Overlay District Nancy Fong, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout asked if the reference to R&D/Light Manufacturing in tbn Resolution was in error. Ms. Fong replied that it was. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There were no co®ents, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Hempel, seconded by Chitica, to adopt the Resolution recommending issuance of a Negative Declaration and adoption of the Ordinance vpproving Envirowental Assessment and Industrial Area Specific Plan Amendment 85 -05, with an amendment to strike the reference to R&D/Light Manufacturing. Motion carried by the following voto: AYES: COWISSI04ERS: HEMPEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, MCNIEL, STOVE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMAIISSI04ERS: NONE - carried a • a a 0 097 C CITY OF RANCHO CUC IAn O, IGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 27, 1985 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Nancy Fong, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN NOM NT - - CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to the Industrial Area 5pecific Plan to add Research and Development /Office use to Haven Avenue Overlay District. 1. BACKGROUND: Last August 21, 1985, the City Council amended the Ind7-str -5 Speciftc Plan to define Research and Develo;ment /Office and Research and Development /Light Manufacturing uses (see Exhibit "A" & "B") Based on such an amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan, both Research and Development /Office and Research and Development /Light Manufacturing uses are permitted in Subarea 6. This amendment created an inconsistency with the Haven Avenue Overlay District where the two uses are not listed as permitted. To eliminate such inconsistency, staff is proposing an amendment to the Haven Avenue Overlay District to permit Research and Development /Office use Attached for you- review is ^a proposed ordinance amending the Haven Avenue Overlay District to add such uses. II. ENV 0.0M1 N7AL ASSESSMENT Staff recommends that the Planning omn ss on ma <e tie findings required pursuant to Division 13, Chapter 6, Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code that would not required subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report and recommend issuance of a Negative Declaration This finding is based upon the fact that an environmental impact report was fully analyzed during • + Industrial Specific Plan process. Further, a Negative Oeclara, on had been issued during the adoption of the Haven Avenue Overlay District III CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n he a " euort newspaper IV. RECOMMENDATION. Starf recommends that the Planr Commission eterna Ine [naE the proposed amendment is consl5teut with the Industrial Specific Plan and the Haven Avenue Overlay District through adoption of the attached resolution recommending approval of the proposed amendment and issuarce of a Negative Declaration to the City Council would be appropria.e. 7 1 ITEM J PLANNING CO`LMISSIO?l STr- REPORT ISP AMENDMENT 85 -05 l November 27, 1985 Page 2 Respectfully su ited, Brrraaaddd (Buller City Planner 88:NF:ko Attachments: Exhibit °A" - Table III - 1 Summary of Land Use bj Subarea Exhibit 080 - Definit'on of Research and Development Uses Exhibit 'C' - Haven Avenue Overlay District - Lend Use Types initial Study Part II Resolution Ordinance =_a Q-9 �F ORDINANCE 90. 272 AN orolb = or T9[ CITE Coumcm or THE cm fr PAECW CDCL'CWA. CALIMENIA, APPNGfIW INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC MAN LMLVMNf 95_02, AlRWoIW THE INDUSTRI4 AND SPECIFIC PLO RFSLRD130 PARKING STANDA:.US For HISEAPCH A CLYKChitef LEo DELINEATING traNICR WILDING ARIAS THAT CAB BE DEDUCTm TRCII PARKING BroollOccm. WK111G5, the plamtK Co sission wd • duly ad,wtso welt: M.rtK on July 24. 1995, to order W WMIdIr ...MSK the industrial Ara SPaotflo Pl»i add. WBERLLS, the Piwtn9 Ceaisaton did reeornad a--endtnE '.he Iadutrlal Area 3p"tfte Plan to pm,tdq for a 1 re3K rate for re »ern ab esnlopernt W.a a» deductible areas free WAtnK r•OUtr.dnLi add WHEREAS. the D3ty C '1 held a duty adr.rita•d wblic bearIhR id order to eemidv arddt.K the •,.SWtrial Arse Spedlftd Plan. SOW. TNOEFORE. It 11 REM. D, that the Clay Cou0ot2 Of the COy or Untho Cutaeanp Ones b.ney ..d :M lndustrtal Area S,ai.. Plae as follouat SECTION It That Pert III. Tagil. III -2 (Pa9• III -), tend Us. 'MI }ri l:tom. Z. »ended to define Rvern And Dv:epae ]: Am e 1. Aslach and p...leoa•n4 Ua in the reasarab. a.aSP• ana� A a•nt. ndl.r ror :ea•tK Y. • Predua:. P. »arh ! 9rwle nftev ACarla•A :TJially ' m ua., cue mt .eit.d tot W :d1K /u» apes 12eee13K ofrtm cars :nun n3.amh and d.r.loPd.n: he1:!•is, aw.h As labs. aeaWtoal enas»ra. aler .. t.aaK ctus, "• ass •mn•:s •:O:• >a+rt uaeso., rMom, • :ban redo•. mi "mW.r fe- lit Such a »a are t"Ical:y leaf taeena..m pure Offlns. but More Snt -M. sun industrial apse. Th. +acs 10 not prosuC, odors• m1a1. rlbnt »n. Or p•rtieul.:es MLCn wu1C adren sly off..: Wee to the ease a:ruC1WY Or M -he fa•N At" Wnar 2a hours on -a1:. aurrallanee 13 necessary , a :.retat.r.. r,Id.ne. Kay be psrdL:ted m1 ANn..d y l Coaf S' m ... Perot•. I. 3 .... rcd a wr.coz.o :... _ :=to .yptea y 1.c u •. doe a tb rolp :.Ch• yradaCaen anO 4231 -bly operations unteh I'll"' see. R A ] w arts. apace. •ProduC: a»•obly rsoas• and a'd.r Motlt tln ofoelated ultra hip teholop ranuraetrtK. Th. Oa.J do not p,,jut. wore. "is.. rUn :toe, o• parttculate Mten weld »rera•IY Went uses In th• Jam s:rue:+•. or on tM aa1 a1... Wh.r N bun en -att+ aure.:::aee+ Is deeeasary. a earetIlW. reat!lee =I bed Perstt.ad M•n .paroled by a 'oiOtttoml us. P•rcit t"" F, +.Dares, t• arndb -0 include •r. ... r•.h Ano a1] +laPC +n: +a•a,L t1. T.nJW16 Para w :111.1 Tnaua :r:al C-tlIW1•a » .0".... . t ]/TKt•• �•—T. - _S�J.I • • 1 _.,1......+u. ++s ,..+ - ] - I. +. 9. t. t7, • 5.1.. :•1 Cuaar.]a 14, 10 -14, r] 'S Soo :y -q Oral* ,. gb. 272 esge 2 SECTION 31 That SebtIm C.3 yarklnR SOaC.a n*11lred (Dag• 111 -2•) be sound" to a .0291tton •. n follow* •. Bea.arnh a De..lopw.t, 1 span* D.r 350 S9uar. hat SECTION 0, That S"tim C.3. We," Spaces, B.cuthed (Page I:C -29) M asIM to ad baebtlon f u fOIIDV31 f. f011evinS Wert" wilding sr•aa can be deduoted frn tn. onrall Parking r*9utr.astm alxtrtesLraxMntnl mss, *I1.stpr SMfts, staidr.11s, and multi -story lobbies. M IT 79gT9ES BESOLTYD, that the My Council final -Mt this asendwnt vlll not eau** significant adyera* impacts upon the enTIMA"It ant .8311.3 a [aptly. De"l"uged for this am.ada*nt SECTION 51 The Mrar 34411 sip this OrdiMnne am the City :l.rk shall maus. a a sae* in b, published within fifteen (tS) Says sr-..r Its M wage at 1.s*% once b Th. Wily Report. a nevsyap.r of general of c utton Published in the Clay of —O %ar o. California. and CIMIat.d to ne :i:/ of Kenn" Cue,entaa. wir. rota. ?Lsm. ArmyrD, and ADoprm this Its our of S*pt.mblr, 1985. AYES, Wright, Bu 112, 41k.13 O I. 3Gq MCES, Bas USM. Bone Ian :. Y k•.a, +yor aster, 11th 1%. Cly C--F I, grin" a. AOTHrm, Cry talc or to. .Sty p- .ant" CallfOmla, d0 hereby "Itttr that tn* f01190tnt OrC1Mr!h w.. tatMOACH at t rapier neti+,[ of the COaatl or the city or Mac" Cueaaenp he15 n the 21st day of august, t985. and vas finally "33" at . IV", bar ini of ^ City Counell or t0. City of ".no Cucamonga held en to stn lay Of S•D'• =� 1985. ta*111t,d this " dap of S•D :•ab•r, 1985 at •an :ho :veiny** California. - / A 3o/ � -s A ODO[31tl Z 3o. Ccy AN O6D:SL -E Cr I:IE city c003CT1. or -,a cry Cr Pismo COCLX04". CAUFOSSU, M'SDUG PAR. I.: Cr ytiE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIr:c Pltl TO ESTLIL!Sd 1 tll:ES 1yL'NS 0VTrLAT DISa_1^ Locam 03 10TH MCES :r DliES ATE=Z 6tr"rEN rOOTH:LL SOULE7180 AND 4TH 3UCT The City Cau +ea of the City e( 'Mena :ueaeen, , :altf :nta• tray orGa:n as hell :vn C..lepeaa 3t4ear•a ATh follwtntl aalev to brety added to Par: III• Wfolimtet 4 nTEt 37", 9t .... ..3", -- Predae Tpe ,armed• of ep. ••• .Iap1Lh dole Onetay bl" da 1a to mt.e wtl Aeo: atanear of vthe adC:e•- T. eerrtder. The Dar. le.ue C,.,lay District d :a moth he .sat M. .3t aXd,, K ls Ha 13 l+.w .:.atvi tm :: 3wbrua sov:h to ate 'Shpt. as a fir anavo In Ri'u0 T.1 /Diil :ap113y The 0..rtoy D11trt :t :a :> G ayel:ed to CI alnea:n ; tea':. < :f :. PlM fer $,=read 6 and T am iror:da• can ]D.lfie MCI" r. a:rietlre de...•pec• Allc1.., ]tan d.bot 4na and lad• ute n Glatlaea ter pore Suaartea 6 and T TOOL.. not v"u.-cally corer. by the Darn Anna. Overlay D12trdat -111 denim.. to M Pr.ro.. my ... I. Viet"" of the n. 3:eet(lo Pla 0...11=04: Ad..,.., to the Ka.M ar.v. Overlay Dl-: *C. shall cR :aa a... :T and :C.e ttet :v D :a:rie : :r_ tra ^. : rl I, :ne ovverlay l M Ou, :b Later T TlCCte]. A:aei Haven lnwe 13 l :u:. rev the in . me e ta .:er e( the city Me viii me the alsi seat lfaan, pA A 1a :a Ino:ro! LD. t t M ;let 13 the of eucaaenp. of me tlar.n tgnve e> - ;d :e :n relatiedeter >LMP mJ:r artviala dteli'r. as •3-.Sal Odu:ouGa• Dar. t.mw is the H hate ,Or the City .d ha :b pets! t tolnjtlr•l erW >f. :n Ceteldp.n: vlth > {t+1Cue CQpp14t:. of dirt aOc.f to rte alrp<!t And the Ia :vatat• IO frewp• SDG ple'1Cea the City a ter. oCDOrtuti :T to evcah:. !ta In .ttvredni lnteoabr, p3M awllty offl,, W prof.ai :teal CoelepMt al:ni the HanAV.... n tou. E.latten to <orr :tor. Go,.. a. PlN The o ... rat PIM aff.-2 cn:•y: ra elr_. +v : '<at Intel rout. ue = area •: • :: r. . —_ _ yea Cad ....... •`.I, f c- .via.ai the O..ral f n, In ad.::: :n, iIN star o :ri: a co stem, G.:(1. the-. to a.teaa, -y to n:af:rp e is or P.rc.P[ : :n of a ro, :e. no 3p.ct% P'. - "a- •M Karen taem _. r. r and t•e :e.ua :r :al ere eatetary ahou:d te au :�.a to Drola a 'eMpva like W for flr� atttrracct%,. .a Ploaaaat vdrkiea Co.%ageoi -1tp M t ralw•. 35PA 85-os 3oa Ccane. y :. U9 yaie 1 A. Caal Sta!r_.nt Geala e ata!emm. !Tl: <IfL - -. tLe <r�wl: YT'a alpha lm bd iallm. Seal for :L. H.... ...... c r. t. .rabed v nti: rrea aualena v1:n eG tnCw:rGl .ad Galatia iay yid vt:p :Le C:.. 3 elected yte aDDela:ed a.....ala. :p13 val r.YUI.a !Lf Current nnu n<.p:::4 of bd fa:w. +.vtrAtlrn2 to m tn. .eat Sn:Ir U< of :c. Cl:y for the Narm L rm:Cr. ° laces. lAA,,torte eater DLab.d dlwlap.mc stoat tn. gem Am.. enrri<pr "" tLQteV C°uaeaSa•f 14te py Av.IdlaS b CLtY .a, n1Sb To11ty ptmf Into the CitT bd by lea+ettas a dtatiaeciv. attactin. end 1 efflce We atavapp.re b a o.Z It" 36" LIZ atth piss W"tl.. identity. 0. Land Oa. Cyan The intro: .f tE1 falttvt. b:rw. a . pa1l.l.a 1a !! t luw wo a.d <er.l. piss .:nata:m: Ylt] ae Naia S-11 for !G Da..n lrbb ,at, Ir of .n :M1:.na1.e. ni[.l Qr jat W.y iota RG c:¢bi:A 11.1 -he prl-ry lava We funrlb .leas Me... a..nu. Ia ta:b," to a. of yi a_ins:raanapr<tu1::u1 a and e:w.. 6mr.ry ffte. m tG rc a1r.a::r uy <anathr ul an ;erai::b to Su ar.a 6. G.;.:: to :h. faava.n :f a food.. .3. D.. _a :, bd . fla:�S tut au<h a daatp : ae deans :b: vltb the atat.d pal far tlnla i.eaw add all Dt,trc. Dra.laiau .f tG O.er:q B.Z. 3111.. aAc,:;e,y <eearelal b0 Gaip.aa a0DDar a.r.fe. W.a ball not I, ..m 30f of tEe fl:or Ye. b by Matter fl.'u!r° aer.le;_I.t. Csa<ea:rae:ee of =w.a S. by ty___• genet fraalaj. la set --i or .lmC sG at 8.3 Th. fell.,", lb. We ty;ea w Dlrc::.d or As... .... perl.:ed a(tE :a tE. L. tlapv L..nu. ' Orlay Of a• -: a! rer�• a: tea ._.. _ ^ uaa Yt:. n te IL,......... au . ^•t ::. fS W..tit :E]LL ]i.1 SY.:.H s y1a: Sa Rat1 CpW.aa.. •.a rw:Ca.. a_ _urv:an ynfyaledl S.rY1<y L dLte:atrattn CtIte Serrt des Cultwal MIA... Supply bead Sayer 1 S.nleti lwl..aa 3-port S.r.l<.a Jpp--A4 httE6 ytd /CC,Lnxlll,4 C tanitam.Dt, , F CTrd:r=x. t]. Fag Paz• j Canat::eml Eau Crnnn:erp Sales S S.rrtgi rater4:ras: rood aaa genera. Sa:,i vast Ford Sal., BetGUV -t•L ?-"-"I So,, :tai NCrutt:n r,ea::lra Public Public lanesall Sofia s u:L a."it l.ty Serrtcea BLLSµves iaaesaly •ancillary tlas LtY :M to 2-% of :�• Roar area or S.f. 3.4 rest "" »Fria» are ape•.::u Rr •ulenes as a p•q me. Tula .rind Woolen- the pnlep.N of tyDlml fre -taming fast feed restaurant:• Also or vetch r -autre 41 »- through fuel::: :es, la tt. Or.rlq Dia :r :et hev.nr, feat fade CCYLd t- ed as an bCi er a••anoap m,, subject to ar± Cam;tiaNl DJ, Ier_•:, as a part or a larger Prvjnt. JnKaed. hive..., .... use nee I. leas:aa direct Ly Scam, :e Bann 4nn•a. C. `1 -tar Plannb Coal] -y; The In ".% O( tRa sect b9 IS to FraKC, (Or tat. rued hn:epes: at the urlt»[ PA -z"I• it-. to tae nr:au process. it.:uan Ito Na».r Play P•!cm :reeve Is eppnrtt'- -y to r »ruN:• toe -Mr-3 Of stna:e ar ,,It 1ple ir;ary rvn.ra and alapwz• p»ccnl d-n,a, —_yt flPIS-11" llr, math PIS-11" of dC.•eo an] vlll ante ha d•t11]Gnt of atCrle pJr.,I, Of Ito, tR oam-v valch you!s .ranat or PneluN fYetre c•r•bCbt of adlac.nt ;are,la to the has- oar "'b" 1% is hat :G 1ht•muca or the mater plane:.' pleas t0 ma: future 4*"";*bt patl-ras it sane. patter, It 13 b attespt 10 d:atnrer prtbl•aa terC,, they dor.lep, to dui vt:h taw.- vblls they Can he aol]ed, and :o tea, ad»maz• CC oppertualan veil• they • »a :. The atanGrna W Ntd.[.,n-a Mich o. -I" Le intended is 4PPLY to alt Pro1..t a a]d ono 44 hat be nnatra:nm ty Pn•[el ..•es •• .. C., r a::- Goanmr:es. C.t 4 C"Ceptas: Raster Pius amlt he supiHae for, Planning cco=33ica lvpr »l. :ep:Rar .ath by do :pre: plan ,._ .rt •_. -area aNl ad1'na Mat•: N':i] 1.0 of Mr ;U.' a tine the Issue, pzN eras CITY OF RANCHO CUCANO \GA PART II - INITIAL STUDY E1iYIROM -E NTAL CHECKLIST C DATE:— II APPLICANT: my AG AAIft�I��� , FILINNG DATE:_ II -Al 8s LOG h". ER:_,Z5Pr4 B5�}S PROJECT:�I�L �i•VYI/ !G /L�I I7�ji t% PROJECT LOCATION: I ENEIRONMNTAL FACTS (Explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets). 3-9 ,30s- YES MAYBE NO 1 Soils and Ceoloev Will the proposal have significant rese is in: a. geologic ground conditions or In changes in geologic relationships? b Disruptions, displacements, compaction or burial of the soil? e. Change In topography or ground surface / contour intervals? V d The destruction, .overing or modification of eny unique geologic or physical features? e. Any potential Increase in wind or water �- erosion of moils, affecting either on or off site Condit 0ns? _ f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? -- g Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ✓ h. An Increase In the rate of extraction and /or _ use of any mineral resource? Z. Hydrology. Will the proposal have significant results in: 3-9 ,30s- page 1 YES Y1YBr SD a Changes in currents, or the course of directior, Of flowing stream„ rivers, or ephemeral stream channels? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surfa runoff? cc water c. AlteraLlons to the course or flow of flood waters? / V d. Change In the amount of surface water in any body of water? e. Discharge into surface waters, or anv alteratiun of surface water quality? f Alteration of groundwater characteristics? ✓ R Change in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with aquifer? an Quality? Quantity? ✓ h. The reduction in the amount of eater ocher - vise available for public water supplies? I- Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? 3. Air Ou a13tZ. Will the proposal have significant results in: i e. Constant or peri.dic air emissions from mobile or indirect sources? 'c Stationary sources? V, =- ' b. Deteriaration of ambient air quality and /or interference with the atcai'uenc of applicable air quality standards? ✓ C, Alteration of local or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movcccnt, moisture r , or temperaturu? of Blota Flora. Will the proposal have significant results Soi i ' a. Change In the characteristics of species, t� `S Including diversity, distribucioe. or number of any species of plants? J b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of Plants? a Will the proposal alter the location, distrl- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the hu=an population of an area? / b. Will the proposal Affect existing housing, or -- V create a de=ond for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results 1¢: a. CC 'age 1 or coeercial diversity, tax rate, and property YES `t%YB!: \D c Introduction of new or disruptive species of / V b Plants into an area? d Reduction In the potential for agricultural �[ production? / Faun- Will the proposal have significant results ,[ In: a. A Change in the characteristics of species, Planned land use of an area? including diversity, distribution, or numbers b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, of any species of ani =als? b. Reduction of the nu =bens of any unique, rare entitles? or endangered species of animals? C. c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of existing consuoPtive or non- eonsuaptive recreational animals into an area, or result in a barrier opportunities? to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration or removal of existing fish or Wildlife habitat? S. POCul]tiya. Will the proposal have significant �I results in: a Will the proposal alter the location, distrl- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the hu=an population of an area? / b. Will the proposal Affect existing housing, or -- V create a de=ond for additional housing? 6. Socio- Economic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results 1¢: a. Change in local or regional socio- economic characteristics, including economic or coeercial diversity, tax rate, and property values? / V b W111 project casts be equitably distributed among project benoflclaries, 1 e , buyers, tax payers or project users? / 7. Land Use and Plannine Considerations. Will the ,[ proposal have 9lgntt Scan[ results in? a. A substantial alteration of the present or Planned land use of an area? b. A conflict with any designations, objectives, pollclec, or adopted plans of any governmental entitles? V C. An Impact upon the qulaity or quantity of — existing consuoPtive or non- eonsuaptive recreational opportunities? C C Page' C Y =S YAY3E NO B. it zesul ;s anssortation1n: nc . 11111 the proposal have significz a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular eovemtnt? —_ b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for new street construction? / c. Effects on existing parking facilities, — ]C or demand for new parking' % d Substantial impact upon existing transporta- tlon — -- V systems? ✓ e. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or movement of people and /or goods? I. Alterations to or effects on present and Potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or air traffic? V g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists / or pedestrians? v 9 the proposal have signifil�es -1-9 mill a. A disturbanca to the integrity of archaeological, paleontological, anal /or historical resources? 10 Health. Safety and Nuisance Factors. 4111 the �-...777LLL proposal tuvo significant rtsulcs in: A. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? / b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? e. A risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident? d. An increase in the number of individuals �F or species of vector or pathenogenlc organisms or the uxposuro of people to such / organisms? v e. Increase in existing noise levels? V f. Exposure of people to potentially dangerous noise levels? ✓ g. The creation of objectionable odors? h. An increase in light or glare? _— ✓ -�a 3a0 CPage 5 YES `tkyn NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant resuats in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic visea or view? b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive — / site? ` C. A conflict with the objective of designated or potential scenic corridors? ✓ 12. Utilities and Public services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? b. Natural or packaged gas? C. Communications systems? d Water supply? --�][ a. Wastewater facilities? f. Flood control structures? g. Solid waste facilities? ✓ h. Fire protection? _ I, Police protection? ✓ J. Schools? k. Parks or other recreational facilities? ✓ 1. Maintenance of public facilities, including �— roads and flood control facilities? m. Other govern mental services? 13. Enerry and Scarce Resources. Will the proposal have significant results in: A- Use of substantial or excessive furl or energy? ✓ b Substantial increase In demand upon existing _ / sources of energy? ✓ e. An increase in the demand for development of / new sources of energy? d. An Increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable forms of energy, when feasible renewable sources of energy are available? °)3 3D9 - - - II. DIf.CUSSION Or EX14A0�'yE•.TAL EVALUATION (!.o of afflr -�eive answers co [he above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures) -S - I 31) Page 6 YES ?AYSE NO e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or scarce natural resource? / 14 Mandatory Findings of Siciificance. — —_ -x/ a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, subs ce ancially reduce the habitat of fish er wildlif species, cause a fish or wildlife populaclon to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Important examples of the majer periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -term, .._ to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals? (A short -taro impact on the environment is one which occurs In a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long - tam it -pacts wil: endure well Into the future) _ e. Does the project have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an Individual project are considerable when viewed In connection with the effects of past ptojects, and probable future projects) d. Does the project have environmental effects which lC +ill cause substantial advLrae effects on h=an beings, either directly or indirectly? ✓ II. DIf.CUSSION Or EX14A0�'yE•.TAL EVALUATION (!.o of afflr -�eive answers co [he above questions plus a discussion of proposed mitigation measures) -S - I 31) CPage 7 III. DETE ?!rNATI04 On the basis of this Initial evaluation: IX I oe the environment. andlarb'ECATI, `DEChLRATIONwilliberprepared. U I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the envicl-nent, there will not be a significant effect In this case betautl qu oit1gation ceasures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project A YEGAlICE DECLIRATI011 WI1.1 RE pR*- PAREO. El I find the proposed project 4.;Y have a significant effect on the envir=ant, and An ENXIR0:9'1: IMPACT REPORT is required Title RESOLUTION NO. 85 -180 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 85 -05 AMENDING THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Industrial Specific Plan Amendment No. 85 -05. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Commission hereby makes the following nT — dTngso A. The Amendment is consistent with the policies of the General Plan, Industrial Specific Plan and Haven Avenue Overlay District. O. The Amendment is warranted to eliminate inconsistency between industrial Specific Plan Subarea 6 Land Uses and Haven Avenue Overlay District Land Uses. C. The Amendment would not have + significant impact on the environment SECTION 2: That the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found this amen enm t wTn riot create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on November 27, 1985. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESO:VED. 1. the Planningg Commission hereby recommends that the City Gc:ncit approve and adopt Industrial Specific Plan AnenBuaiet 85 -05 to add Research and Developnent /Office to the Haven Avenue ", -rlay District. 2. That a certified copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1985 PLAT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY • Uenn s L. Stout, 313 PLAVNING COMMISSION / MON C IASP AMENDMENT 85 -05 l November 27, 1985 Page 2 ' ATTEST• x� �t / —Fr—aduuller, veputy becretary I. Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduce], pas:.cd, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, it a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of November, 1985, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONER!: REHPEL, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, BARKER, STOUT NOES: COKMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMIrSIONERS; NONE 3,,154 ORDINANCE NO. 249A AN ORDINANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 85 -05 IN ADDING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT /OFFICE USE TO THE RAVE11 AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 249 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Part III, Development Standards and Guidelines is hereby amended to re�as follows: Y. HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT B.3. The following land use types are permitted or conditionally permitted within the Haven Avenue Overlay District. All other uses shall be prohibited. Permitted Uses Administrative and Office Financial, Insurance, L Real Estate Services Communication Services Medical /Health Care Services Professional Services Administrative Civic Services Cultural Business Supply Retail Sales d Services Business Support Services Eating and Drinking Establis- tments Research and Development /Office Conditional Uses Convenience Sales d Services Entertainment Food and Beverage Sales Fast Food Sales Hotel/Hotel Personal Services Recreation Facilities Public Assembly Public Safety d Utility Services Religious Assembly * Ancillary Uses Limited to 20% of the floor area per 8.2. 31" - DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIIIONGA STAFF REPORT March S. 1986 City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician N ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 27 FOR TRACT NO. 12650 -1 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 27 to Landscape Maintenance District No 1 for Tract No. 12650 -1 located on the northeast corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue. The Deer Creek Company, developer of Tract No. 12650 -1, has been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report which was tentatively approved by Resolution No 86 -18 on February 5, 1986. RECOHffNDATION It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 27 to Landscape Maintenance District No. I �a /nd approving the Engineer's Report. Respectfully submitted, 31 EXHIBIT "B" July 1, 1985 Hr. Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer CITY OF RANCHO CUCA`SO \CA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamnga, CA 91730 SUBJECT: Landscape Maintenance District For T t 12650 -1 Dear ML,Hubbs^UMA Based upon our mating of June 26, 1985, we are hereby submitting this letter requesting some modification to the standard annexation of Tract 12650.1 to the Landscape Maintenance Assessment District. As you are aware, the Dear Creek comunity has equestrian trails throughout the development which are maintained by the Homeowners Association. This new tract is an extended phase of the existing project and will also contain similar trails and a community trail along Haven Avenue As we had discussed, our Intention Is to install the trails in accordance to the quality and standards of the Deer Creek ceaaunity. This includes the wood fence rails, trees and ground cover in the trail area We realize that this is not in accordance with the City's standard equestrian trail policies; however, during the tentative tract map review stages this was discussed with the Trails Committee and a tentative agreement was reached in order to construct the Haven Avenue come munity trail consistent with the existing Deer Creek trail. As a result, this will obviously require much higher level of maintenance which the Homeowners Association of Deer Creek is willing and desiring to provide. Since this 1s a substantial commitment for maintenance along this area, we hereby are requesting that the lots within this tract be charged only at half rate This is similar to that of other projects such as the Brock Development which Is maintaining their Archibald Avenue frontage RECEIVED 3/ 7 JUL 21925 THE DEER CREEK COMMY POSTOMCE WN'488 ALTA LUMA.CWFURMCITY 7U1 EEQW.9&HCa �F3��9�D323 Mr. Lloyd Nubbs July 1. 1985 Page 2 This letter serves as a formal request or preparation of the engineer's report to annex the project into Landscape Hatntenanee Assessment Dlstrie but at the half rate and to have that reflected in the final engineer's report and ultlmstely into the final subdivision report. We stand ready to assist in any way ncaded In order to accomplish this, otherwise we will assume that this letter is appro- priate in order for this process to be completed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience. NDV /ac 3/,5- Sincerely, THE DEER CREEK COMPANY Michael D. 9airin Director o! Administration and Planning CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNEXATION NO. 27 to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 FOR TRACT NO. 12650 -1 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with 1. Division 15 of the Streets and (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description the requirements of Article 4, Chapter Highways Cider State of California This City Council has elected to annex all new tracts into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract 12650 -1 as well as on the lots directly abut*ing the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the Tract Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTIO4 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by the developer and have been approved as part of the improvement plans for Tract 12650 -1. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in conformance with the Planning Commission. Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract Map and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference ar, hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and spt..ifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty ($.30) per square foot per year. These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (including Annexation No 27) comprised of 642,852 square feet of landscaped area is shown below: Total Anrual Maintenance Cost S.30 X 642,852 soua -e feet 192,856 3/9 Per Lot Annual Assessment 19.2 81561 31.06 Per Lot Monthly Assessment 31.00 • 2.59 x 50% • 1.30 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached Assessment Diagram. Tract 12650 -1 will be assessed at 50% as lung as areas are maintained Dy others In the event maintenance becomes the responsibility of the City, Tract No. 12650 -1 shall be assessed at full rate (see attached Exhibit 8). SECTION S. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the test of this report SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for Annexation No. 27 is found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June 1986, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the 1985/86 fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7 Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City En3lneer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Anne o the District or abandon the proceedings. S. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year to June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 31>0 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION N0. 27 RESOLUTION NO. Iff -i S M &' - A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 27 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 12650 -1 WHEREAS. 5th day ofFebruary, 1986, adopt its tResoluti n of cIntentionnMo. 86-19 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 27 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 86 -19 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolu*ion of time, for headed "Notice of Improvement °, was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and nomber as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerx; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -19 according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said Copies were duly mailed In the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clark; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity fer the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby, resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set fcrth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -19, be done and made; and SECTI0N 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by th. Engineer s'i ell —rem finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment n t e ngineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin until a80 percent of said tracts have been occupied. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Ilubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 14 FOR TRACT NOS. 11853, 12922, 12801 -2, D.D. 84 -51 AND PARCEL MAP 9318 AND 9204 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ANNEXATION NO. 12 FCR TRACT NOS. 12922. 12801 -2, 12650 -1, D.R. 84 -51 AND PARCEL MAP 9318 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 Attached for City Council approval are resolutions ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 14 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Annexation No. 12 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2. The following are projects to be annexed: District No. 1 (arterial) Tract 11853 Tract 12922 Tract 12801 -2 Tract 12650 -1 D.R. 84 -51 Parcel Map 9318 Parcel Map 9204 District No. 2 (local streets) Tract 12922 Tract 12801 -2 Tract 12650.1 O.R 84 -51 Parcel Map 9318 The attached resolutions also approve the Engineer's Reports which were tentatively approved by Resolution No. 86 -26 and Resolution No. 86 -28 on February 5, 1986. continued... . .3a3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Ordering Annexation No. 14 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Annexation No. 12 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No, 2 March S. 1906 Page 2 RECOMMENDATio7 It is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 14 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Annexation No. 12 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and approving the Engineer's Reports. Respectfully sutxoit�t'!d, LBN:LB• as Attachmer s 3a October 28, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamo nga 9340 Baseline Road Rancho Cue amonga, California 91730 Subjcct, Request to jjin Landscape/Lighting District for Tract 12801 -2 Gentlment The Doer Creek Company hereby requesto that the 32 lots within Tract 12801 -2 be annexod into the Landscape/Lighting Maintenance District. It is our understanding that there in no fee or charge for such an- nexation and that we will be responsible for one year maintenance on perimeter landscaping. Please not!fy our office of any action with regard to thin request. Sincerely, Michael D. Vairin Director of Administration and Planning MDV%dl 4. THE DEER CUEK COMPANY POSCOMCE BOX488 ALTA LOMA.CALIFORAIIA 91701 (714) 989 3323 ,3e�s d JI' IL Roy Ea Daly Construction Corporation' ' � 11 'C'i .. , { , 'yl •, )..., t; l n pJ t 1 g�Y� • OctobeI 4, 1985 ' ' i ' ' • i ' ' I I .� 1 • �I{ _i`i FI iI�J p �0 .,hSi i t (. i5..,;,• y I I >,rtl I � �'�'�I t'IFK 2i�..ai (Id I.�''. �•il �.. ' iL,' � fC I I ,. � t'''r 9, B„i, <'�.�w i' I 1. .. .y�Kr..d �I t•:•i,! ,. � I n. l!lY� [.{cif Lloyd Hubbs,•City Engineer" 1 5 '•' °' J "1 i.�City of Rancho Cucamonga r; °•I''iar/G.i jl :f9 �I 'If' I i'14 �rrr' 1•-9'' , I, t(•r�11'Iy (' I-,.; Post Office Box 807 { "I f. "1 s I '11 1 T, ,I Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 i �f •' • I 1 I 1,k•' '5 � ti. Dear Hr. 1(ubbs, � >. ''i''' ''': : I' fhi ''ll'7'il�l���'I',�'lriit.4e�� "�• ).��j•i j.�),,;:Y� "�l'�9) !'!�'.4 y'l i %r1119�J•'(iwllr;�• }j �'F�i Daly Construction Corporation respectfully requests the annexation 'Of Tract 1e1853 into the Lighting and Landscepe Maintenance District. ' ;r P' if •ii .ri .I I'i'I •' I ( ., C.Y.41 � „1•C', r I rr J I' , %a(�� •'•< If you have any questions lease do not ` J�• •!'• "' �qt + ,. ;i at (714) 987�L-8024. ' p hesitate to give ma a call Op Sincerel Y , 1, Sincerely, L. •'il �'!! /t ' r.l'; l', } {�'•,, t 1,4 •Iifr�'..'t +f•t' I n�: \h j�'yn'f If' i , ' 11 1, tli•,7�1• (' r I i ' '�� �� •• r i, ., r y''j �.,7i•� :� �'j'�• (i•yto i.'li,`l��.tl �l tl /�. iJ�,� •���t 14 �tjl .j JO >xl/� YLY�in�• '• �; ' I r 1 ,air .�.' J I'(t�i t f4 e .,i„j.,•.6 r i (J ° 'r ' R' 'ti•17 / I; n I J,: 1 sl' I i• I }L O !!" '(� •• �,} �' 7M James G. Adams 1•. n.j•�.(l Ty. ill,.. i1:f 1 - , I:'. I.."''' Ir, l' p'II.jyi��eW11�I�t'r✓'g��I'Ijjj !�, �iv rl'iY ('r I S •i'y�tr �ple "'I'Ir i)i! A. `,' ��l�t .k,e I� n.�w' If�'1%+ i, 14rr4jr f ,j��liiJCA /mm 1'..I? 3/'i��1.� t ,i IItC I �, 1 J' , i ,; I(� f: [(ft)AIt • 1 ��S7p'I (i {I'. ` ItrJ.•)1 ,, •�l'i at a.�l.'a •.r'•'I�.NJ r�14'.11"dC� {p �Ilii'T?f SS?i y�ii.:.'�tbi'1ey';j11�+,�• 7t I'f {1 J1.1 - 1 • i�;�j� •J 1, fl: �'�, •it 1 IY'l l'� ry4 /i L i' Q }J�' ilia ) 4 !`r ! ;(IT t,i 'vl•' •.�• L `T iq, •y!.r IJ 1, I �•i���•:y l: �,7 •�'��,�{{1jj1 , ++. � I ,I' "ia, I. 1•' 'I '7 i �`'...q,� ( xY:tV• .� ,.'(• 0.l +� elYj'r�•11.., t `R'II��'q�1(1�ii ll�).y, Fri (.`,I�:'! "'• 4 -Plrl1 +:19. =it'll• } �' I1 {J11,(jli', �1 't •f4�jt' "4I i'''." Ili j(•ji j(r' w ry'�u /j.,I� ;1� r "Ili ,K ✓:! 1.1'x. ' rJ- 1'•f;:i`' �'.��': t,6`I'lIS• t l� i h 1, :ef;l Tel Ij'1QIVt 1 I in ., I;'„•. .�1t -•.r•. 1 �., -Pr i flr.yf.P� i 1, ' 9y H', r i. i ;, •i rf.i '7''ti j .• �r`t!f,`Ir(�ki ••5,1:51 .1Y"•dtT,lq ,1( e I . , . %I t Y 1 I .. ,Ir • 1 �,)• '+ 'i �•. 'V' .. .i';l'' 'Lr(. vii% ii) i.{;,.,, Ir�fa 'Yi;,l.•4�`..�pJall:rt;..,�;n rh!'•�'�4,1' '_ .nl '. ; , .� w1..1�,_,: t • rix, •4 J.1' :I,J i. la i)i:}'� 'Pow . ,�y },�. 'rL .' "' �`r- (, J_ "{J lI •I ..? 1 ^I I •S'k'i ''•''i.•'.]�)1 �I.1'I� •I'{r',C. {I V•lC j ^'•f rf ,. {.. ('>,j :.'Dr]JA },• l' 1e'��'(..�';�1.'�y (•'h!'r �..'J•'l:'ii •.:t�tA'�: r ll'1',.f.�4/J.•s '1r /I�', r C{l f ( f ,t" 1. :'i t,I.J �r r 1�•i:�•1 1 n,CJ lj ~,_,•!g;r .C,iSf .tl7:l:' {•l�fi'(�c� -Cpl, l , .. � :• � . '•� °� Poi' ',.'� C ,t„Y y µf I'};," t, - v ' �, J..„:,. .. .. California Office (714)9k:7-8024 9330 Baseline Rd. • Suite 206 a anho Cucamonga. CA 1730 ,,�G'i$ , ''•fir..: L, �..i +. ITT V L 0[VELOPNENiINC. �i 601T1O:N nM510N November 6, 1985 .,,z,;•- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTENTION: Ms. Linda Book Engineering Technician RE: TRACT 12922 LYNNEHAVEN COMMUNITY •r , Dear Ms. Beek: Pease include our �• " "• Project referenced above in the City of Rancho Cucamongaa lighting and landscape maintenance district. I understand i - that our inclusion in the district is now a requirement of our design .t,-,,--,review 80 -22, and storm drain system. �3. _ ,; ,y� •� fi�1 "t=4 Ficaso ,call me if o 4:1 '11 i. .....`p�': you have any`qucetiona. A- ;;O�Si..: erol 44 :1!:X05'.•,• . �,i, +f: f(!"L LANSEN DEVELOPMENT, INC. � �xMa �: Murdock o -, Pro ect oft Managor °. t;; .,��•�_ lII.M:lfh cc: Tom Benson Wayne Johnson File 7 -J e 3 �' ftgn fat DOVER DANE, BUTTE 4 I NEK'PORf BEACH, CAUFORNLt 925631 (nA) a17•ta52 w ?!:±L.•'. s .. / l Mr. Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 September 20, 1985 SUBJECT: Request To Annex Into Lighting Maintenance District For Tract 12650 -1 Dear Mr. Hubbs: Please accept this letter as our request to join the lighting main- tenance district for Tract 12650 -1. This tract is located on the south aide of Banyan between Beryl and Carnelian Streets. We are scheduled for final Council approval of the final record _11�?`•. map on October 2, 1985. if there is any additional information "I !'it.!•9 whichis needed in order to accomplish this, please do not hesitate - :J:'::T to contact our office. Sincerely, ��• -'" THE DEER CREEK COMPANY Michael D. vairin Director of Administration and Planning MDV /ac THF. DEER MI(COMMMY R)ST0RICEB0X488 ALTAL0MACALIFURN gal (714)9893323 A.H. REITER DEVELOPMENT 'o R"CNa COCAI207104 Septenbor 20, 1985 Ns Linda Beak Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 9330 Baseline, Suite 201 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SUBJ1 Request for Installation in Lighting District for DF 84 -51 Dear Ms Bak: This lette is to anrve as out request to he instil1lr't1 into Lite lightlnq na ntenance district (OF tha Haven Commerce Canter pro. )e,t, located _t the northeast corner of Ilu:on Avenue and SeventE, Street, with a prniPct number of Ni 94 -51 G1�rely 1'llt�,1 G �. Vica -P rest ant of Planning A nnaign A II REtTER DEVILOPii'cNT CO; PANY 339 hlaheE Add, ss P O go. 77Sa . Nmpan 8euh, [1111111" 9765E-725a . (711) 7514691 Pulltnid 11 RedhJl KENSLEY Fe Is e, oawxro s Ken 1, pj' s Kom I, C.'W October 14, 1985 Mr Lloyd Hubbs City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga c/o Mr. Doug Mays 2151 East "D" Street, Suite 120A Ontario, California 91764 Res Parcel Map 9204 Dear Mr. Hubba: Pursuant tc lour respectfully request that Map 9204 be permitted to maintenance districts. DJM /ac 51910 -CL41 5191G review of our Parcel Map 9204, we the Kensley /Moan project in Parcel join the landscape and lighting 30 Sincerely, KENSLEY /MOONN �ti-C !i David J. Moon Partner ?665 Wls a Ba a,d SWe 650 "B:.nn Hal Cav 902,2 Teeppm 12131858 1740 a Tftcc 12131 278 0797 • Ten 688 40, i NN MARIETTA INFOFMATION & & C' i T COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS November 25 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA Ref: Parcel Map 9318 To whom it may concern When Parcel Nap 9318 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 25, 1985, one of the conditions for approval was for the installation of street lights on 7th Street In connection with that improvement. Martin Marietta Corporation is t9indibe put o on the LiMap 9 i718istrict for the north side of 7th Street as Sincerely, Richard J James Assistant Director Corporate Communications cc Gary Sanderson 33� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 14 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is In compliance with 1. Division 15 of the Streets and (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721. SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to "A` into Street Lighting Maintenance determined that the street lights to all lots within said tracts as well street lights the requirements of Article 4, Chapter Highways Code, State of California annex the tracts enumerated in Exhi "it District No. 1. The City Council has be maintained will have an effect upon as on the lots directly abutting the are Nor: to be provided for with the ..ssessments established by the district The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual mat ntenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall bo considered to benefit the sane as a tot. Si CTION 3. Plans And Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the ,fevelopers The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement an the Individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the sane extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto Detailed maintenance activities on tre street lighting d' :rict include the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illuninatico of tie subject area 3 3 -'�- SECTION 4. Estimated Costs ho costs will be incurred for street light ng improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on ictual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting °aintenance District No. 1 (including Annexation No. 14) omprised of 1• ./ lots and 256 9500L street lights, 208 5800L lights and 1 27,5001. is sho.m below: I. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: &-n .+ ze* Quantity ate*' — 90 58001. 208 8.75 27 500 1 15.00 • gh ressure Sodium Vapor Lamps Rate Mo's Total 256 X 9.90 X 12 • S:1 412.80 208 X 8.75 X 12 • $21,040.00 1 X 14.00 X 12 • S 168.00 i ' 7. Costs per dwelling Unit: 552.420.80 i Total Annual Maintenance Cost 52421. •6.6 ,ear /unit No. of n is n strict 7617 6.88 divided by 12 • .57 /mo./unit Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION 5. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1•, Annexation No. 14 These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. 333 SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the District SECTION 1. Orfer of Events I. City Council adopts resolution Instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3 City Council adopts Resolution of Intcition to annex to District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every year In May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 33V EXH181T 'A' Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 14 of Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: 9SOOL SBOOL 27,500L TR 11853 2 TR 12922 5 TR 12801 -2 3 8 TR 12650 -1 36 D. R. 84 -51 2 PM 9318 3 PM 9204 3 ,3 B-5- 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 14 �f7'Y.tUSEO P/O F � _ -- W N HLA/RJ AVE /sni e sr , e a Qpy�lTj Q �� IxC7TH /CL 11 V12 M � W 1 0 54N Bcri W^RO /NO FRIVY I i 33� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cicle; COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Trd t �; fz STATE OF CALIFORNIA I & s if I, Im N ILOYC HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER R CE 23889 DA— PaB� j m} ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ANNEXATION NO. 14 �I�� trYOM r1(�V� CZ ecunr•wo• �1 _ _.tl_ = .I__.._ If Qri Y `JM 1 F 9 _ "'a.u.O 1194Ue T . .lfgar rnrcf f , e•r .,,.. UIL "CYUlI Y1. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA p .r COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO t�- e; t3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA c. , �tD LLOYD HU -3S CITY ENGINEER Rrc vase.. NO. title; page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 14 ,ur , +o cvo tu, etacunirorurroua rptn I I I —J TaL1�C' 1 m lxm•1 CI AEFEY COLLEGE sl i� �i uorT!1 u /yyr Naf TO SUIE M UnITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,� T 4` t> lv nn LLOYD WEBS, CITY ENGINEER arr e. e,,.. �r apse ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 14 / l jJFTI1'Dif +T- TV �rrrl a ,; ruLI Ii�E] - DI / 11 '�f�l • un •11D1 7'- '�- ,� r { I - ��I.t' ]ice J 1 N W.DYN J J J q.I 1 »- J �11 1 J•`L --1 IV'T -�--1� - � 339 j,�i " "'"s' ;^ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w title E�; ,' �; \' COUDITY OF SAN BERNARDMO �/ \ t; �' Iz STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,� T LL- ,> lv _ .. Hn rase LLOYD HUBBB CITY ENGINEER RCE238 DATE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LiGFITING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 14 subam v Loon CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,p COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO is STATE OF CALIFORNIA 'I� T LLOYD HUBBSCITY ENGINE 1 V EA Frr wee.. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 14 r ; 1 _1 j ti C, H --0- ► • > oj`- " CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rf= ` COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO A c: ST:�TE OF CALIFORNIA T T l�f Im ., nvn M61R5. CITY ENGINEER RCE23RR9 OGTE 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 12 SECTIGd 1. Authority for Report This report 1s in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit "A" into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on local residential streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were atta led hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the stre ^t lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4 Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting iml-rovement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers Based on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. 3 4/�) The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (including Annexation No. 12) comprised of 2402 lots and 651 street lights is shown below 1. S.0 E. Maintenance and En.rgy: Lamp Size* Quantity Rate-* • g reszure Sodium Vapor **SCE Schedule LS -1. All night service per map per month, effective January 1, 1983. Lamps Rate Mo's Total X 9.90 X 12 " 651 X 8.75 X 12 " S68,355.00 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: $68,355 00 Total Annual Maintenance Cost " 68,355 28.46 /year /unit o. o n is n s r c 2402 28.46 divided by 12 " 2.37 /mo. /unit Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street Lighting Maintenance District No 2 ", Annexation No. 12. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwellirg units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessabli land, the assessment for each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It is proposed that all future development siidll be annexed to the District. 3u3 SECTION 7. Order of Events I. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3 City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex a District and sets Public hearing date. 4 City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5 Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 3v(/ EXHIBIT °A' Properties and improvenents to be included within Annexation No. 12 of Street Lighting Maintenance D•strict 2: 58DOL TR 12922 5 TR 12801 -2 8 TR 12650 -1 36 D.R. 84 -51 2 PM 9318 3 3 5/5 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 12 m10 69' TRACE 8 m NO. 12801 -2 a J 50 IA 1UtES] AD x•5 i MANDARIN AVE Q N A BHAIY/7N I STREET I VICINITY FLAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ENGINEERING DIVISION �> VICINITY MAP eu ,t..,. Valle MJ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ' ANNEXATION NO. 12 u I ? 1 l �`T ����•I 1 I 1__ p _ r Y. Y al.uz- a -w ,T _ NIGNIAYO AYLFYL � YICINIIIYM 9(Y7 Ltf R10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w title 3c5ry YA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO , \ "' a> STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 Ian — N — LLOYD HUB 85. CITY ENGINE R RCE 23889 047E — " page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AN ;;2XATION NO. 12 sweu�ayroNUwAL rwrn MAC" mm mw -U CtWEET COLLEGE IlIy ul,77 flan? NOT TO SCALE 3gff TOt^CrTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Eitle; COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA sin LLOYD HUBBS, CITY ENGINE — — _R RCE23889 DOTE P�Ce ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 ANNFYATI(1N NA •10 uuw -- -- - Irk I'ili I . Ii I I� Ff 111119 +I-TT1 I III IT {I I IIIIIIIIII'Pt111111.1•li•I�jI II '* i I E — _tJ cu I.. w ' 111 � uri �I � .. Jj i-ir 1. '}_• II �' �_ 1 y �,I� :w,., I kr�rllli I�r;tiilill� WI 112f�1Jllll 1' •-. �''1311II �III�1}��tillJ11111 ~� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 'aTI al 5 i> 1 �1 1 77 LLOYD HUMS CITY ENGINEER RCE 2 3889 %TTE [ICIe, ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO �/ 1 Iz SPATE OF GALIFO ---- ,� T lv_ — LLOYD HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER n 2�jggy D4TE G2Be i RESOLUTION NO. S-93ze9-W S (, - S 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANUE)tATION NO. 14 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ALCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 11853, 12922, 12801 -2, 12650 -1, D. R. 84 -51 AND PARCEL MAPS 9318 AND 9304 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 5th day of February, 198s, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 86 -27 to orcer the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 14 to St eet Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolu:ion or Intention No. 86 -27 was duly and legally published to the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and Resolution ofEIntention, the eadedoP Noticehof Improvement', was dulls and legally Posted to the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by large, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in *he office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons odning real property proposed to be asses^ed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -27, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having nnw acquired ,Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -27 be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a— T- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's export are hereby approved. 3s/ SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said tract Fav-e been occupied. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of MarJ1, 1986. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: n D. a s, ayor Beverly A. Authelet,—Ut-y—TrerT 1, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, an^ adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the * day of •, 19". Executed this ' day of •, 19" at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ever y A. ut a et, ty er J �� RESOLUTION NO. T11145=} 8 G - S Sr A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEtW'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12922, 12801 -2, 12650 -1, D. R. 84 -51 AND PARCEL MAP 9318 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 5th day of February, 1986, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 86 -29 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 12 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 86 -29 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed •Notice of Improvemeni•, was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as req,fred by law, as appears from the Affidav't of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -29 according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is here , resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the pr.,,-ic interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -29 be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; a--F -- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's Report are hereby approved. 35-13 SECTION 4: The assessments shall not be'-in until after 60 percent of said tract— save been occapied. PASSED. APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 5th day of March, 1966. AYES: NOES: 9SENT: on 0. a aT —Mayor ATTEST* Beverly A Aut a et, City er I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (spa_ial, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the * Jay of *, 19*^. Execu this * day of *, 19 ** at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Beverly A. Aut a et, City Clerk 3si' DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 5, 1986 ral City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 26 FOR TRACT NOS. 12830, 10210, 12801 -2, 12914, 12922 AND 11853 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 26 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract(s) 12830, 10210, 12801 -2 12914, 12922 and 11853. The following developers have been notified of the public hearing by mail: Tract Developer Location 12830 Boyer Eng W/s Beryl S/o 19th St. 10210 Forecast Corp. N/o Almond E/o Sapphire 12801 -2 Deer Creek Co. S/s Banyan E/o Carnelian 12914 Pannon Design NEC Highland & Archibald 12922 Lansen Dev. Inc. N/s Highland E/o Haven 11853 Roy E. Daly Const. Corp. NEC 19th & Ramona The attached resolution also approves the Eng4neer's Report which was tentatively approved by Resolution No. 86 -24 on February 5, 1986. 3515 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Ordering Annexation No. 26 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 March 5, 1986 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION It Is recommended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 26 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineers Report. Respectfully submitted, LBH:LB:,laa Attachments 3E(�, • , 4 1 • l,t,k•rl cltli }I ..a f1i,n , n. .I +'l1: t . a: 1 •.�JLY. x, sf. {. 1.n � rnl + -P', ••r .., .. ...r -q i1 <ir.t}n Roy E. Daly Construction Corporation October 4, 1985 •41' i''�'�l� .. 1.)•�t -I i �1 • 'i %tinl�']11•'U- 11l' 4�,'drl.(,1 IN31 ''1 "' ')I ") F � lY� L7. 1311` ,I ,� .,.. �d. 1r,,kr'- )•' #�•f;,:•��,��'.�r;l• � � Ii''17��'•�i�l I • 1'G :,, '1`1 iY:ryl,ll•ol L' ' � �( tsrv�,, r.�a r� 'I Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer ` $1,4," 1 ! 'I +' Irl `r ,) W"1j •, 'Ir City of Rancho Cucamonga IatlI 111( �), r� Post Office Box 807 !Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 �_ ''. t; "Ij,') 1,• Dear Mr. Hubus, " II i' {' `•q , ) 1• '):.jLI �' t i� ' I'I 11 i '� fi .� � ' f 1 J ' A. 1•(aa^I .�t,V�� ! Daly Construction Corporation respectfully requests the annexation 9• J {a�;vj Of Tract 11853 into the Lighting and Landscape Maintenance Distric t. l,.ryft� ir' 4!hiia'•Irt•Y7. {. f'1•'v'11,iJ'i h-{•^r�'JIIIirY' tr • "Y'IQ t:.td JSM, 1, Ir C{'ivr "J'd'n'�!+lit}il✓� {i1P''�S If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call J` at (714) 967 -8024 ,• ro r.ak, *�' fa l l S.' ' •• ;';'. S i'I J' f) I r 11�• ry'�;''? i !1 I• ` r`f :t 1' 1 a F , 11' : Sinter 1 J" O.P. i,l °1i. " I +rt'': 'r i l..'o),L� 7u,L5:. •N•E�II.filpfy�SCP 'i�:��l,rJt,,l l I`'i IJ4 "- qr • 1• t I a,f n y, , .li; Y. , L• J Ii tr „ 1' ,f�! J 'FsfJ�'Ij �'iYggp{l)}L}rrt -`. . L,, , i,, .. ; io -li t''.ErE it tii'y'1 11�1w 1+ {rfA +• '� i ' -d 6i' +ip �: i.l _u l,�t4 ii✓.e • aL! , �, ,r.. ; -ift'�,Y� C.. r,. : ..1 •: in>,..?Jn .,t ;.e!I, fI'• Ir.. ,I��.`.ti . ' ' 4 i r'It ..•.a, e�'�lI l�.tr ' 4 7n:1.. . nrY rr t rs..4,.. .�(•1��r,. x el.', , �3e7 ,!Jame= G. Adams r 3. •�il1 1 .11 •a• I- xARl.';t.fsb �). , 41. 1 n.•hFL L ,. !_ t 1 :rl (4l " 'f ;:)jl} 1) 7 :( Y '�t ltx ,f^� 1': 1•n ^l , ,r.,... ",I'- . 7. ", ,1 - r1 % J1a14 • , +.a, p f��3jj 1ji 3 i P . e % 5�,,; U ' I v 'r ., _ r ..: r , _ .:• 'I •'9: i, %�,'.; c'd,`ti:�lti:k H{� '�: , 1 : n r ,' I, .I ' J ; .•a Ir )'1Y.,i ' a .. c ,'•'4^I% i a•�.±i Al 'r rrr .i4r r, , L,` ,f ''1 ^)Y 1 17.1 9. e1r• 'Y{' t'it 'f q Fp 1�16rr r y���7Y' ��'!.5�tr•t:f`l +�f�'.b5• "�h1r`• i� "s'I•I•tq"a,t,i,.J,,;1'1',� f` 1Ji'it � `,�'•1• Fyi:(�) ^!tl•P :.lyr• '•,' ',.! t ., 1 y..,,?•L9L� 1 $ `Yi'LL1tn J I,� ;;i �•t7�'i,`Lt(�,� •` I..• +1, �^y;i•. ^;�7��41(:R.i'?rL ;iw {i .)r. ;.5 ��'1 iir;f.•ff�• �,i•:�.t4'::llise�����'.•'N'.. c:{•)����9.•�,�'i{!lai� F L 1 ...{rrr CCCC•c II•; t t 7 ' ''1�:-f;" "tr�•�'l� p �i n 4ttr 1i+t�.k . ' ' „�, �.: "•� � (. r, ,. > 1'r ' � r:.. Ill •IN{4 �j�l,,yy 211 jf•• - California Office (714)987.8024 t •• :;,n�rj���}' ` 9330 Baseline Rd. • Suite 206 • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1 ; LDI - DEVELOPMENT.INC. 90en1EM DTVWCN November 6, 1985 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ATTENTION: Ms. Linda Beek Engineering Technician RE: TRACT 12922 LYNNEHAVEN COMMUNITY Dear Ms. Beek: Please include our project referenced above in the City of Rancho Cucamonga 's lighting and landscape maintenance district. I understand that our inclusion in the district is now a requirement of our design -:mss roview 84 -22, and storm drain system (&,-J'r• Please call me if you have any questions. '-��•' wide t.....,..�ly DEVELOPMENT, INC. •/ If Murdock t Manager MLM: lfh cc: Tom Benson Wayne Johnson File 3sR� 891 DOVER ORNE. SURE 41 NEWPORT BEACH. CAUFORNIA 926831 pin, 812••952 PANNON Design & Development, Inc. November 8, 1985 Engineering Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Tract #12914 Gentlemen: Subject: Joining the Landscape and Light Maintenance District As a condition of approval, It has been requested of Pannon Design & Devel. opme..q Inc. that we Join the Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Districts and we hereby do request that Tract #12914 be accepted Into these districts and acknowledge the assessments. As a P.U.D. (planned community development), with a home owners asso- ciaOon, thru its Articles of Incorporation, is obligated to maintain the exterior and common areas. Also, there Is an offer being prepared to deed the private streets to the City. In the event the City should decline the offer, the Interior streets and lights would be private proparty and again would be the responsibility of the homeowners association. For your verification, the Articles of Incorporation are enclosed. Respectfully submitted, PANNON DESIGN R DEVELOPMENT, INC. Potar M. Laden President PML /vab Encl. 3s7 cJ[yr venturo Eloulevaro • Woodland lillis, CDlifomio 91364 • (818) 703 -7106 October 28, 1985 City of Rancho CUCamonga 9340 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Subject; Request to join Landscape/Lighting District for Tract 12801 -2 Gontl©ens The Doer Creek Company hereby requests that the 32 lots within Tract 12801 -2 be annexed Into the Landscapa/Lighting Maintenance District. It is our understanding that 6horo is no fee or charge for such an- nexation and that we will be responsible for one year maintenance on perimeter landscaping Please nc;ify our office of any action with regard to this request 3(� c.) THE DEER CREEK COMPANY POSTOMCE BOX488 ALTA LOMAMFORM 91701 (714) 989 3323 Sincerely, kale v/flC W SV, � Micheal D Vaizin Director of Administration and Planning - MDV /dl '•�4'Jhd•' 3(� c.) THE DEER CREEK COMPANY POSTOMCE BOX488 ALTA LOMAMFORM 91701 (714) 989 3323 .I 3(� c.) THE DEER CREEK COMPANY POSTOMCE BOX488 ALTA LOMAMFORM 91701 (714) 989 3323 GO R Fie" C O R P 0 R A T T I —ON Cons truction /Development August 6, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department 9320 Baseline Rd., Suit, C Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Attention: Shintu Dose Re: Tract 110210 Dear Shintu Please accept this letter as our intent to join the Landscape a Lighting District for Tract 110210. If you should have any questions regarding this, please call me at (714) 987 -7788. Sincerely, Joe Carman, Vice President JC /do 3�, t 9333 Baseline Road . Suite 290 • Rancho Cuci.,nonFa, California 91730 714-987-7788 BOYER ENGINEERING CO. Juac 11, 1985 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention, Barbara Krell RE, Tract Ho 12839 Gentlemen, On behalf of out client, A -M Company, we hereby request permission to Join the City -Utde Street Lighting and Maintenance District for the above referenced Tract. Very truly yours, :L'C• Dava Gillette DG,aJ cc, A -M Company 3j��,)- 2950 AIRWAY AVENUE B3 • COSTA MESA, CA 92626 . (714) 966-0606 CITY DF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNEXATION NO. 26 to the Landscape Maintenance District No. SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with 1. Division 15 of the Streets and (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) SECTION 2 General Description the requirements of Article 4, Chapter Highways Code, State of California This City Council has elected to annex all new tracts into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within Tract Nos. 12010, 12830, 11915, 12801 -2, 12914, 12922, and 11853 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in i . annexed tracts are shown on the Tract Map as roadway right -of -way or easemet to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by the developer rid have been approved as part of the improvement plans for Tract Nos. 12010, 12830, 11915, 12801 -2, 12914, 12922, and 11853. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in conformance with the Planning Commission Reference is hereby made to the subject Tract Map and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby rade a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (5.30) per square foot per year These costs are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, (including Annexation No. 26) comprised of 626,626 square feet of landscaped area is shown below: 3(�3 Total Annual_ Maintenance Cost . . 626,626 square feet ° 187,987.80 Per Lot Annual Assessment 1y 9 30.57 Per Lot Monthly Assessment 30.57 2.55 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached Assessment Diagram. Where the development covered by th s annexation involves frontage along arterial or cillector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION S. Assessment Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A ", by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for Annexation No. 26 is found ' be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. The City Council will hold a public hearing in June 1986, to determine the actual assessments based upon the actual costs incurred by the City during the 1985/P6 fiscal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscape and Lighting Act oe 1972 SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or abandon the proceedings 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. 3<- 5e ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTE14ANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. 2 g ; /9tr' St PROJECT G u In H LA HrKa� y", ss4 ere Tract 12830 3r� 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUC ,%joNCA c, A c cir.; ENGINEERING DIVISION '. = nn VICINITY MAP N Page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. A ANNEXATION NO. 26 i v p0 ooaDpap 'A ° lO gg TRACT 10210 f 9(�- c% ,� ", ;� z �l y 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUlIVNIONGA A T T ENGINEERING DIVISION c > VICINITY NIAP nn 1Iv tit ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM IANGSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 1 ANNEXATION NO. 26 I BRAI YfJN I STREET 01 p N A ,% l VICINITY M1IAP 3r, 7 fix! a ')� CITY OF RANCI-10 CUCA,XIO \CA title !� \� dy, ^sY c � 12E `I ENGINEERING DIVISION z N 6 VICINITY MAP un page zozo r.9• TRACT NO. 12801-2 8 i 0 & 1 -0-M S'[UAD `P.t ^,S50 IA K;N 4� i3 — �' MANDARIN AYE 01 p N A ,% l VICINITY M1IAP 3r, 7 fix! a ')� CITY OF RANCI-10 CUCA,XIO \CA title !� \� dy, ^sY c � 12E `I ENGINEERING DIVISION z N 6 VICINITY MAP un page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. ANNEXATION NO. 26 3F °i CITY OF RANCHO CUCGV%iONGA A Ocis' ENGINEERING DIVISION nn VICINITY INIAP Page nl ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 ANNEXATION NO. 26 �J� o �41 auu.r•.ea• r.nru t D• [aa D„s_ -na . r !li I' Al •� _ •M�DMIf MD AY[LY[ • -_� � MD \D1A1 rtAr.T hr lAa•..•"• .�i CITY OF RANCHO ClIGUMO, \GA �\ A ENGINEERING DIVISION un VICINITY MAP ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. '1 ANNEXATION NO. 26 1 370 CITY OF RANCHO CUC\\10� \CA ENGINEERING DIVISION 1� T nn VICINITY MAP 1� tit Page RESOLUTION NO. €eata5zgQ g oo - 59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 26 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12830, 10210, 12801 -2, 12914, 12922 AND 11153 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 5th day of February, 1986, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 86 -25 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 26 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 86 -25 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention an file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption tlereof, notice of the passage of said Resolutiun of Intention, headed 'Notice of Improvement ", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears fron the Affidavit of Posting said notices, of file in the office of the City Clerk, and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -25, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and —inner as required by law, as appears fron the Affidavit of Mailing an file in ie office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -25 be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer s ere y finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment n fTEngineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION a; Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin unt a er 0 percent of said tracts have been occupied. 37 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 5, 1986 TO: Mayor and Member of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: REPROGRAMMING OF 1984/85 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT TUNDS D G IE NOR H ONN R MP OV M N AO ECTS Attached is a memo from the City's Engineering Division requesting reprogramming of $20,000 of Block Grant funds for the North Town Street Impr vement Projects: A. Turner Avenue Improvements These improvements include the widening and construction of asphaltic concrete street pavement, concrete curbs, gutters, driveways and sidewalks and the installation of street lights along the west side of Turner Avenue between Feron Boulevard south to the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad north of Eighth Street. This will also include the widening of the south side of Feron Boulevard approximately 140 feet west of Turner Avenue to match existing improvements and also the construction of Main Street from Turner Avenue west approximately 160 feet. B. North Town Phase IV These improvements include the construction of asphaltic concrete street pavement, concrete curbs, gutters, driveways and sidewalks and the installation of street lights along the following streets: 1 South side 8th Street between Archibald Avenue east to Belmont Avenue. 2 Belmont Avenue between 8th and Acacia Street 3. Aca-la Street between Archibald Avenue east to Cot:ige Avenue. The above mentio..ed rrojects are to be constructed using Community Development Block Gant Funding. The previously budgeted CDBG funds for C5 ?3 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CDBG Funds - North Town Street Improvement March 5, 1986 Page 2 the projects were $340,905. As a result of recent bidding, additional funding of $20,000 is needed. 4t the end of 1984/85 Block Grant program year, approximately $31,000 was not expended under the Program Administration account. These funds may be realloca•ed to this project if the Council so desires. RECD` MENOATIOa After considering any public input, it is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution authorizing the reprogramming of CD86 adwiniet.atinn funds to the North Town Streets Improvements Projects and direct staff to Inform HUD of the reprogramming. Resp %y submitted, Brad Culler City Planner BB:RY:ns Attachments: Memo from City Engineering Division Resolution Improvement Area Map C3 ?1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: February 21, 1986 TD Otto Kroutil, Senior Planner FROM: Richard Cota, Associate Civil Engineer O� � v 2 U � > 1977 SUBJECT: Comwnity Developnent Block Grant Funded Capital Design Project Status The following is a brief status report for current CDBG Projects. The apparent low bids received on this date for bo.` Turner Avenue and North Town Phase Iv were $173,676.75 and $153,832.41, respectively. The sum thereof plus ten percent (10%) for contingencies is $360,260.08. CDBG funding allocated and reprogramed for these projects is $303,000 + $37,905 - $340,905.00 Therefore, the difference of ($360,360 - $340,905) $19,355 is being as" ted as additional COBG funding needed for both projects. RCC jaa 3-2 � ti e RESOLUTION NO. f89 -GS- !R 9C0 —(p G A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPROGRAMMING FUNDS FROM THE 1984/85 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, following a public hearing, the City Council authorized the Community Development 81ock Grant funding for Fiscal Year 1984/85 in the amount of $467,000; and WHEREAS, $31,000 in administration funds were not expended; and WHEREAS, increased cost for the North Town Street Improvement Projects, Turner Avenue and North Town Phase IY are projected. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby reprogram administration funds in the amount of $20,000 to the above mentioned street improvement projects. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this * day of *, 19 *. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jon 0. Mikels, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, TriTtler c I, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular (special, adjourned) meeting of said City Council held on the * day of *, 19**. Executed this * day of *, 19** at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Lever y A. Authele -, City Clerk a7i Ranchtt Gaed to r Amethystaat 355MPH;o h odinance chur2Street fro, Archibaldtto Havei at from Bernardinol5 at 4froPHVineyard to Archibald at 35 MPH; Victoria om anda These streets have been the subject of a traffic engineering speed survey gradesuandy radartsurveilla surveillance s prevailingisp eds. f Hillside R ad its tae44 such as foot wide and Carnelian Street currently inaccordanceowith California PVehicle Code uSection 22352. Other Vehicle Code Sections make this 25 MPH zone unenforcible with radar increasing ntnumber of violatorefforts are becomingcawareaof tieThlawtregarding radar use. The proposed 35 MPH limit is not only more reasonable for this type of street, the street ThehotherpstreetLSectionshpresented here are currently unposted9 thus considered by the courts to be 55 MPH zones. The proposed speed limits will enable effective enforcement without creating an unreasonably high number of violators. RECOMMENDATION Sectioreco mended of t the nitcipalo Lade, adopt the attached ordinance amending it is Respectfully submitted, PAR.bgl Attachments 37�- CITY OF RANG, ?O CUCAbIONGA 0%,3CAa+ot. STAFF' REPORT ��' , '� � O O Vol Z DATE: March 5, 1986 19n TO: city Council and City Manager FROM: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Establi.hment Speed on Hillside Road, Church Street, San Bernardino Road and Victoria Ranchtt Gaed to r Amethystaat 355MPH;o h odinance chur2Street fro, Archibaldtto Havei at from Bernardinol5 at 4froPHVineyard to Archibald at 35 MPH; Victoria om anda These streets have been the subject of a traffic engineering speed survey gradesuandy radartsurveilla surveillance s prevailingisp eds. f Hillside R ad its tae44 such as foot wide and Carnelian Street currently inaccordanceowith California PVehicle Code uSection 22352. Other Vehicle Code Sections make this 25 MPH zone unenforcible with radar increasing ntnumber of violatorefforts are becomingcawareaof tieThlawtregarding radar use. The proposed 35 MPH limit is not only more reasonable for this type of street, the street ThehotherpstreetLSectionshpresented here are currently unposted9 thus considered by the courts to be 55 MPH zones. The proposed speed limits will enable effective enforcement without creating an unreasonably high number of violators. RECOMMENDATION Sectioreco mended of t the nitcipalo Lade, adopt the attached ordinance amending it is Respectfully submitted, PAR.bgl Attachments 37�- ORDINANCE N0. -Ipezes.W D b I AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SECTION 10,20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CM CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. Recitals. (1) California Vehicle Code Section 22358 provides that this City Council may, by ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a state highway. t -affic survey, y, ofcertainrstreetsEwith nrthesCity oft Ranaho CLCamonganwhich streets are specified in Part 8 of this Ordinance. (111) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set forth in Part B, below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (11), above. B. Ordinance NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBT ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 10.20.020 hereby 1s amended to the Rancno Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: 10.20.020 Decrease of state taw m'xlmum seed. It is determined by City Council —reso u on an aeon a as s o an angineertng and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law if greater than is reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist *eon such streets, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when signs are erected giving notice hereof: Name of Street or _Portion Affecte, 1. Archibald Avenue -- Fourth Street to Banyan Street 2. Arrow Route - -Baker to Haven 3. Haven Avenue.- Highland to Wilson 4. Hellman Avenue -- Foothill to Alta Loma Drive S. Heilman Avenue - -6th to Foothill 6. Hellman Avenue - -500' north of Mantanita to Valley View 7. Beryl Street - -BGO- north of Lemon to Banyan 8. Beryl Street -- Banyan to end 379 Declared Prima Facie Speed Limit (MPH) 45 45 50 35 45 40 40 45 9. Base Line Road - -West Litt limit to Carnelian 45 10. Base Line Road -- Carnelian to Haven 40 11. Carnellan Street -- Foothill to end 45 12. Eighth Street - -Grove to Havel 45 ate. Etiwanda Avenue -- Foothill to Highland 45 14. Highland Avenue -- Amethyst to Archibald 35 15. Grove Avenue--Eighth to Foothill 40 16. Turner Avenue -- Eighth to Foothill 45 17. Sapphire Street - -19th to Leman 40 18. Sapphire Street -- Banyan to end 45 19. Vineyard Avenue -- Church to Base Line 40 20. Whittram Avenue -- Etiwanda to east city limits 10 21. Victoria Park Lane 35 22. Baryan Street - -from west city limits to 400' 40 east of Archibald 23. Hillside Road - -Prom Ranch Gate to Amethyst St. 35 24. Church Street - -from Archibald Avenue to 40 Haven Avenue 25. San Bernardino Road - -from Vineyard Avenue to 35 Archibald Avenue 26. Victoria Avenue - -from Etiwanda Avenue to 40 Route 15 (Ord. 169 Section 1 (part), 1982: Ord. 39 Section 5.1, 1970). Rancho Cucamonga 5/82 124 (1) Both sixty -five (65) miles p.r hour arl fifty -five (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonablL or safe. (it) The miles pe^ hoLr as stated are thL or1ma facie speeds which are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly mo%ement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof; (iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said streets; and (Iv) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to Install appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared herein. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause tie same to be published as required by law. 3!F0 l: C' % RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE. March S. 1986 Mayor aad Members of City Councilr 20. I PgON, Debbie Adams. Deputy City Clark Iw SUBJECT: 7�c tO,Cy o WZ z U, > 19n The wnt• .te for Item 6 -A (Consultant Contracts for Bond Counsel. financial Consultant, sod item 6-Aat Engineer) vere not reeeived in time for the coverabai elr irtheon. T e.: Contracts vill be dal ivered to you under asperses DA /kep 3p/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATEi March 5, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Community Development Director BY: Olen Jones, Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO TM- Wl�'"�INATION5 N �L N BACKGROUND: In September 1982, the City issued Assessment District Improvement IImprovements In the 11 �.iust aluwee. $8,890,000 Tprogram finance as Initiated by prooperty public owner petition. Several months ago, Council authorized staff to investigate the possibility of refunding this issue. At that time, due to the condition of the bond market, a refunding would not have accomplished a significant enough swings to Justify the refunding. Recent evaluation of the available resources and the bond market Indicate a substantial swings for the property owners can no% be accomplished by refunding the outstanding original bonds. Estimates of the refunding indicate a nominal swings to the property owners of over $1 million. EVALUATION: The refunding stricture being Investigated by staff will neither increase 1 e outstanding principal debt nor extend the maturity dote of the bond Issue. It therefore qualifies as an advance refunding. Because of the Interest swings and changes In structure, the annual assessment of property owners within the district will be reduced. In finding rthat it Is Inn lthe public interest to refund the first nd directing the preparation of o report by the Assessment Engineer. This report will determine the outstanding principal and interest on the original bonds, estimate the principal amount of the refunding bonds and the maximum interest therein, and determine the old and new assessments. 3 8e3 City Staff Report RESOLUTION DECLARING INTENT TO ISSUE REFUNDING BONDS AND APPROVAL OF CONSULTANT CONTRACTS FOR BOND COUNSEL, FINANCIAL CONSULTANT AND ASSESSMENT ENGINEER March 5, 1996 Page " Willdon Associates will prepare the report for Council consideration on March i9, 1986. Also at that time Council will receive a Resolution of Issuance authorizing the Issue of the refunding bonds and a purchase contract with Stone & Youngberg, the Underwriters. In order to facilitate the Issue, It Is also necessary to obtain the services of Bond Counsel, Financial Consultant, and As ttssment Engineer. Bond Counsel will review oil of the legal documents, proceedings, and of ficiol statement to assure that the refunding Issue Is accomplished In compliance with the most recent regulations. Bond Counsel for the original issue, F. Mackenzie Brown, has agreed to act as Bond Counsel for the refunding. The Financial Consultant provides an Independent review of the bond structure and costs, reviews the bond structure and costs, review of the Official Statement, and recommendation as to the timing of the issue. Fieldman, Rolapp d. Associates have agreed to perform this srvice for the City. Willdan Associates, the Engineers who preoared the report for the original bond Issue, have agreed to prepare the engineering -epn, t necessary for the refunding. RECOMMENDATION: The Council lake the following action (1) adapt the attached �esulution making preliminary determinations and declaring Intention to Issue refunding ')ends for a special assessment district, and ordering a report thereon; (2) approve consultant contracts with F. Mackenzie Brown as Bond Counsel, Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates as Financial Consultant, and Willdon Associates as Assessment Engineer. Respectf"lubm' Jack Lam, AICP, Community eve opment Director JL:OJ:kop attachment: Resolution 382 r ieldman, Ro'lapp & Associates WWWAL FWANCut, CONSl..rr,NrS February 26, 1986 City of Rancho Cucamonga P O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: lack Lam Director of Community Development RE Financial Consultant Services Refunding Assessment District (6th Street Industrial Area) Dear lack: Pursuant to your request, Fieldman, Aolapp & Associates is pleated to submit this letter Agreement to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the 'Agency') for municipal financial consultant services to be performed in conjunctioi with the refinancing of the proposed improvements for Assessment District No. 82.1 (the 'Project'). We understand that the refunding would be accomplished pursuant to the provisions of Division 11.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, cc— tmereing with Section 9500, known as the 'Refunding Act of 1984.' We have the experience nod ability to perform the aforementioned method of financing. We offer to assist you in a financial advisory capacity by utilizing and making available to you the research, statistical, and consultant staff of our organization to such extent as may be necessary and helpful. Mr Lawrence G. Rolapp, assisted by 61r William L. Fieldman will be directly responsible for providing financial consultant s:rvices to you. Our service$ can be divided into two phases. The first phase would be concerned with the financial planning and all other necessary analyses, public meetings, workshops, conferences, and required hearings. The second phase would be concerned with furnishing financial consultant services to be performed in conjunction with the marketing of the Bonds. Zgy 2001 Busirsoea Center Drive, Suite 203 • Irvine, California 92715 • (714) 752.2781 PHASE II; I. Preliminary Ru We will confer with your Staff, Bond Counsel, and Consulting Engineers for the purpose of making a preliminary survey of the Project and to assist in the formulation of a eoordiiated plan to finance the Project. It. Attendance of Public hfeetlnr /sy k•h =ns. 'hd will be available to meet wit` the affected proprrty owners to explain the effects of any proposed financing. 111. Censultatlon /Advic We will attend any meetings concerning the Project when do =ed necessary and, in addition, be available for consultation and advice until such time as the Bonds issued to finance the Project have been sold. IV syetk Sessions and Re i •m We will be available to conduct and /or participate in work sessions and seminars which may be he'J to discuss the Project and methods of public financing. V Public Ilearina. (It Reo d d) We will attend all public hearings (if any) reQuired by the provisions of the Streets and Highways Code and shall participate in such hearings to the extent deemed necessary. MA5E II: We will perform the following additional services in conjunction with the marketing of Bonds pursuant to the Refunding Act of 1984 I. Munlcinal Bond bra ket Furnish the Agency with information concerning current municipal Bond market conditions and make recommendations as to the technical details of the financing, including maturity schedules, funds, covenants, and other deta Is which will, in our opinion, make the proposed financing most acceptable to prospective purchasers and, therefore, marketable at the lowest possible interest rate. 3 �sS LU"AL fnWx VM. CONSL LTMTS It. D!tgolinted sale At the direction of the Agency, assist the Agency in negotiating a sale Of the contemplated Bonds. I Assist the Agency in the svlcction of a qualified underwriter whose reputation, financial strength and experience will best serve the interests of the Agency and affected property owners 2. Assist the Agency in negotiating the sale of the contemplated Bonds to the underwriter selected pursuant to Number 1 above, and make appropriate recommendations to the Agency 3. Review the financial aspects of all documents relating to the marketing of the proposed Bonds including any Underwriter Disclosure Document Ill. Allendance nt Bond ansing, we will compare closing figures, including accrued interest, anet assist in the coordination of even's of the the closing. IV Table of Debt Rewire After the Bonds hLve been delivered, we will prepare and furnish the Agency a Table of Debt Serv'ce which will set forth actual semiannual and annual payments of principal and interest due on the Bonds FEES For all services to be rendered hereunder we will charge an all inclusive fee of SI0.000 payable at the closing of the transaction. In the event the Project is abandoned prior to the completion of financing, the Agency agrees to pay us a fee equal to the reasonable value of services rendered from the date of this Agreement to the date of abandonment, not to exceed 510,000. Reasonable value for our services shall be determine,) by using our current hourly rates in effect at th• time of such abandonment, plus reimbursement for usual and customary out -of- pocket expenses. Attached hereto is a schedule (Schedule •A•) of our hourly rates in effect as of the date of this Agreement tlllraC. AL FOWL AL CONRATANTS . ' FNSU£ The Agency will reimburse us for usual and customary out -of- pocket expenses, including, but not limited to, the cost of producing and distributing or updating the Disclosure Document, costs of financial advertising and Costs incurred in connection with travel outside of Southern California, if such travel is necessary I-, the furtherance of the Project and is authorized by the Agency. In addition, if it is possible to obtain a rating on the Bonds from Standard & Poor's Corporation and /or htoody's investor Service and /or other rating service and /or if municipal Bond insurance is available, the Agency agrees to pay for the costs of such rating and for the cost of insurance, if insurance is purchased. Payment for all services rendered and expenses incurred pursuant to this Agreement shall be paid within thirty (30) days following award of the Contemplated Bonds to a bona fide purchaser. In the event of abandonment of the Project, abandonment fees shall be due and payable immediately after abandonment. T RaiS This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until financing contemplated herein has been completed or the Project abandoned, whichever first occurs. It is expressly understood that this Agreement does not intend to and is not under any circumstances to be construed as requiring us to perform any services which constitute the practice of law; we are employed in an expert financial advisory capacity only. If the foregoing Agreement is satisfactory to you, please take aporopriate action to authorize its acceptance by signing and returning the duplicate copy hereof Respectfully submitted, FIELDMAN, ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES Lawren_e G. Roiapp, t Senior Vice President LGR:pae Attachment 3 �r? a LM1AACn'AL FDOU CW. CO SULT,u.TS ATTACIIhIENT Executed on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga this day of 1985. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Title ATTEST: MUN CiPAL i1 WCi L COMXTAM$ Fieldman, Rolapp & Associates L"'C -AL Fr1AACtAL CO "T.WTS SCHEDULE 'A' SCHEDULE OFD Prinrin +le of the Fffm 595.00 Pcr Hour TerWUQ Auh-t M S4500 Pcr Hour MALM 2001 Dueineee Center Drive. Suite 203 • Irvice. Cclifo: aim 02710 • (71e) 752.2781 SPECIxt COMSEI AGREt Kkf THIS AGREEMENT It Made Ord entered Into this day of , 1985. D)i� aM between the CITY OF RARONO C CAMO9r, ^FORM D; (hereinafter (henel.after referred to as 'City), referred to as •COunsri') WHEREAS, the City did previously undertake proceedings and COMM asseS~t$ In a special messeent district pursuant t0 the tens and Provisions Of ant abn1c'"' I eproveamt Act of 1915'. being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, Said SXCi41 asmsa"t district loom and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT R0. 82 -I; and, WHEREAS, im,mew,gt bands representing the unoald assestxnts within Said ASSaSteent District were Issued ans sold In tot Manner provided in the - Iwo,~t bred Act of 1915', being Divlsinn IO of Said Code; and. WHEREAS, at this tiMe Pty 11 desirous of re""ing legal counsel and inttlatlnq Proceedings to refund all Outstanding learovtatnt bonds pursuant to the 'Atfunding Act of 1994 for 1915 Act bonds', being 01,151" 11.5 of the Street$ and Highway& Cade of the State of California. NW. THEREFORE. IT IS MEREIY ALLIED by and between the Parties hereto as follows$ SECTION I us d serrices In he de 4efnd reasseent proeteingss and bond refunding in dslputedruing district under the applicable provisions of the previously reformed •Refunding Act of 1994 for 1915 IaprM" "t Act bands'. In a aped Al district known aM designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT N0. b2 -12 (REFUNDING) (hereinafter referred to IS the 'Refunding District') Said servins shall Include- A. NKoOo,,ndatlons as to prxedure, schedules and actions that should be Conducted and tat "; b. preparation of all resolutl "s, notices, contracts, bend fares, and other papers am docuseets rewired In tot proceedings; C. lmination of the pocedings. step by step. as taken; 0. 6aalnstlon and review of tot 'R Wt- of the Engineer. including the schedules attained thereto and the etastessaent diagrAs. t. Appear at all hearings under the OrOC"dingt. and attend any "Oting mere attendance is requested; F nut rtcomendations as to salt of bonds. If desired; G. ISSU MO of " approving legal Opinion attesting to the validity of the ormedings and the issuance of the bands. SECTION 2. that the Pty Shall DerfOrM as fo110wr A. Furnish to Counsel eocua "tation Of Via, pmceedingt and Cerllfled certified COPles as are available and aay be reasonably rewired by Counsel In the perfg lme Of the Services hereunder; 3 go B. Pa to Counsel a fee In the MAt of TWELVE THOUSAND OOLLAAS IS�y,000.00I C Payment of the above- referenced fee mall be as follevs: All due and Parable upon receipt o- laln<r from lM sale and delivery bonds to lht Successful under lter. SECTION S. In the Went the WMeedln S Are tHtlnatgd er abandoned prior to coapte. date enedta oe nanl hourly rater at SIOOOD fee for r hour,l hotr to eecled $1.000.00. SECTION e. That this Agreeme 4 may be teAlMted by either Party hereto by mailing Witten notice thereof to the ther party. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto bare caused this Agreement to be eeecuted on the day A'J year first henlnaboee Written. Alt(M Lily x City OF RANCO C10MRSA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 'CITY- CITY OF RANCHO COCM GA By-. - CITY OF RANC40 CtXMOMGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 'C"SEt' F NtCRENEI[ &AOWN, INC. Rl. . ; 1 1. a i RESOLUTION NO. S (, - (p I RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, MAKING PRELIMINARY DETERMINATIONS AND DECLARING INTENTION TO ISSUE REFUNDING BONDS FOR A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, AND ORDERiNG A REPORT THEREON WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, did previously undertake proceedings and confirm assessments in a special assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 19130, beinq Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 82 -1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "); and WHEREAS, improvement bonds representlnq the unpaid assessments within said Assessment District were Issued and sold in the manner provided in the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California: and, WHEREAS, at this time, the City is desiruus of initiating proceedings to refund all outstanding improvement bonds pursuant to the "Refunding Act of 1994 for 1915 Improve- ment Act Bonds ", being Division 11.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said refunding bonds and district to be designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO 82 -1R (REFUNDING) (hereinafter referred to as :he 'Refunding District') NOV. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBf RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Tnat the foregoing recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. The public interest and necessity require, and it is the intention of this body, pursuant to the provisions of Division 11.5 of the Streets and 41ghways Code of the State of California (the "Refunding Act of 1984 for 1915 improvement Act Bonds'), to refund all outstanding Improvement bonds for the Assessment District and to levy reassessments as security for such refunding bonds, and tc issue refundinq bonds as authorized by law. SECTION 3. That this proposed refunding is hereby referred to WILLOAN ASSOCIATES, who is hereby directed to make and file a *Report" in writing containing the following: A. A schedule setting forth the unpaid Principal and interest on the improvement bonds of the original Assessment District to be refunded and the total amounts thereof. B. A total estimated principal amount of the reassessment and of the refunding bon..s and the maximum interest rate thereon, together with an estimate of costs of the reassessment and of issuinq the refunding bonds, including all costs of issuing the refunding bonds; 3�a C. The Auditors Record showing the schedule of the principal install- ments and interest on all unpaid oriqinal assessments and the total amounts thereof. D. The estimated amount of e::h reassessment, identified by reassessment number corresponding to the reassessment number on the reassessment diagram, together with a proposed Auditors Record for the reassessment. E. A reassessment diagram showing the Refunding District and the bounda- ries and dimensions of the subdivisions of land within the Refunding District. SECTION 4. Immediately upon the final preparation of the 'Report' as above ordered said 'Report' shall be filed with the City lerk and s y es to led to this legtsiative body for further consideration as It relates to proceedings to issue refunding bonds for said Refunding District. SECTION S. All outstanding bonds and original assessments of the Assessment District shalt continue and remain in full force and eff:ct and be secured by the original assessments until superceded and replaced by reassessments and refunding bonds validly and legally Issued for the Refunding District pursuant to all the t­ms and provisions of the •Refunding Act of 1984 for 1915 Improvement Act Bonds'. APPROVED and ADOPTED this _ — Cay of . 1986. ATTEST: CITY OF RANCHC CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA MAYOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3,C/3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA TONGA r%1CAAfn., MEMORANDUM y. c Lfo 8 L p UL A 19� I DAIS, March S. 1186 TO: Mayor and Me:bers of City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman. City Manager SIMACT: CONFLICT WITH MARCO 19 COOHCTL MS As you are aware, the County Lae and Justice Center is scheduled to open on Thursday morning, March 20, The County, however, has scheduled a dinner to commemorate the opening on Wednesday, March 190 at the Red Lion Ina in Ontario. Since the Great is • major one, not only for the county, but also for our community, the Council may wish to reschedule its March 19 mating to a time which does not conflict with the County I" and Justice Center opening. In checking with County staff, we were informed that the date has been selected for considerable reriod � time. Any date which was discussed resulted in conflicts for somebody. The staff, however, has assured us that the County would like very much to have Rancho Cucamonga Councilmeebers and key staff in attendance at the dinner on March 19. If the City Council wishes to reschedule its March 19 regular meeting to a date which does cot conflict Jtb the Lau and Justice Center opening. we will have a calendar availaF a at the March S City Council meeting. LMM /ksp 3 ,Fy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C AIQ STAFF REPORT , w = ff 1 y p 2 U� � 1977 ,)ATE: March S. 1986 T0: Mayor and City Countil _ PROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, Ciq Maw SUBJECT: REQUEST TO MEET IN EXPC13TIVE e MAPnIMG PENDING MTIG AIIM It is requested that the City Council met prior to our nest regular meeting at 6:00 p.m. at Lions Park Community Center. The purpose of the meeting will he to meet in closed session to discuss pending litigation matters. LMW /dju 39s QU 'C-,aH _ VICTORIA ADVISORY COMM= Februa y 27, 1986 Mayor Jon Mikels CID Rancria Cucamonga City Hall P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucaaonga, Ca. 91750 Boar Mayor Mikels: �l A.C.T.I.V.E. P.O. BOX 472 ETIWANDA CALIFORNIA 91779 e p'tWCF� VED. h tnM,va OfC 7CIA, 414 MAR 041986 7i8i9'm� Irr1i2i3 S,s It is my understanding that there is question among some of the City Council a.ambers with regard to the Recreational Vehicle Facility ,proposed by the William Lyon Co. The two main ccncarns seem to be its necessity, and its aesthetic quality. As you are wall aware, part of our C.C. & R.•s require that we park our Recreational Vehicles in an R.V. Park, and not in our frontyard, driveway, or generally in sight. Due to the fact, that the Victoria residents do not have access to a conveniently located R.V. Park, many residents hero are choosing alternative measures as listed above. An you can guess, this makes for an unattractive community. The Victoria Advisory Committee (ACTIVE) has worked with the William Lyon Company on how we might remedy these problems, but they do not want to pursue any legal action, Just as we homeowners do not want to be put in the situation of suing our next door neighbors. When the William Lyon Company made the R.V. /Storage Park proposal to the Victoria residents, we saw thin as a viable and acceptable alternative. ACTIVE has been involved with this project since its very beginnings. Jim Bailey, Vice - President, and /or Steven Ford, Project Mgr. of the William Lyon Company, have presented this project at s.averal ACTIVE general meatings, and has Introduced this project through William Lyon's newsletter, the Victorian. To date NQ resident has expressed a dislike towards the project. In fact, the project itself, including architectural drawings, have been shown to over 160 Victoria homeowners. At all these presentations, Victoria homeowners expressed very positive opinions about having such a facility in our locale. VIr -MRIA ADVTSORY CON5EM EE A.C.T.I.V.E. P.O. BOX 472 W—ETIWANDA, CALIFORNIA 91799 In addition, ACTIVE has bean included in all Design and Review processes, and greatly appreciates the "extras° the Planning Cnmmissicn insisted upon to mnka this R. . /Storage Par' a operation. Since, realistically speaking, neither the William Lyon Company nor Fhs Victoria residents will file legal action against the violators of our C.C.& R.'s, I can only see the installation of such a facility as a viable, and postive compromise to our ever present problem. As you well know, Victoria is growing rapidly, and before we know it there will be thousands of homes. I fool that such an operation would be fully utilized in the future. In closing, I hope I have clarified a few points that were not mentioned at-tho February 19, 1986 City Council meeting. I will be present at the upcoming March S. 19869 City Council meeting. At that time I will present soae alternative lonq range solutions to the aforementioned problem. S ncerely, D borah N. Drown President, ACTIVE cc: Richard Dahl, Mayor Pro Tem Pamela Wright, Cmuncilmember Charles Buquet II, Councilmember Jeffrey King, Councilmember Lauren Wasserman, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Steven Ford, Project Mgr., We. Lyon Co. � 6rq CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Crw J.. 0 nikd, Chuk.J U."111 hftm'hft I9 Nkhvd\L1W' 1'.m,L.J%%rkhl March d, 1986 )ear Colleague, It is with bittersweet emotions that, by this letter, I submit my resignation as your appointed Mayor. I will act be a candidate for either Mayor or City Council next November as you already know. I will assume full candidate status for election to the Board of Supervisors for the 2nd District on March 7, 1986. In addition, I will be installed as tho President of the Southern California Association of Governments in April. I have sincerely appreciated the confidence that the past two City Councils have demonstrated by selecting me Mayor. My campaign activities and the presidencv of SLAG will demand additional time commitments which could interfere with some of the ceremonial functions a Mayor is obligated to fulfill. I look forward to working with you on issues of mutual importance through the balance of my term on the city council. My resignation is effective at the conclusion of the meeting on Wednesday March i, 1986. Sincerely, ion D. Mikels, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga 93100ASELDIEROAD.sDITRC . POSTOFFICEOOx607 • RA . \fNOCCCA \I0 \GA.CALIFOR. \7A81730 • (714)96 €1831 Appraisal Report O! Proposed Right -Of -Way along Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA (Assessor Parcel No 202 - 181 -09) File; 135 -58 For L D. KING, INC. ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA Date of Value January 1, 1986 By J. WILLIAM MJRPNY AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING APPRAISERS P O Box 987 Chino, CA 91710 -0987 J MILLIA11 ?11 -HP11v .• o ..+.c •.aa eo Na....•NO .a•a..a.aa •oa• o•• cc eo• ee• aaso . a•e ea c• CHINO CAUMIRN3A 01110 January 2, 1986 L D Bing Inc 2151 East ••D" Street, Ste 120 -A Ontario, CA 91764 Attn: Doug h%ys Re: Proposed Right -Of -Nay along Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California The property is Identified by San Bernardino County Assessor Parcel No. 202 - 181 -09 (and as per your File: 135 -58) Deal Me Mays: As requested, we have completed an appraisal of the property referenced above The purpose of cur report is to estimate the fair market value of the property proposed to be taken fcr the subject project, and also considering any severance damages and special benefits As of Janunry 1. 1986, our estimate of fair market value of oronerty to be taken, curative costs, severance damages, and special benefits Is as follows: land - Improvements - 522,400 00 S 3,625 00 C•Irative Costs - S 1,500 00 Severance Damages - $ 0 00 Special Benefits - S 0 00 The followyng Information sets forth the purpose and scope of ou• appraisal as well as the supportive data, assumptions and Utvutlrg conditiuns wlucl fo ^Ted the basis of our opinion Respectfully submitted, J WrUtAM MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING APPRAISERS \Lt hHOI S \f •,rhM 11 N; pl TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page PAGE 1 Letter Of Transmittal Tabs Of Contents Introduction Identification of the subject property Summary n° estimated values Puroose and Definitions Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Certification Description Area map Area data Neighborhood map Neighborhood data Subject plat map Subject data Photos Location Size Shape and Strect Access Utilities Topography Zoning Improvements Present Use Itfghcst and Beat Use Valuation Three approaches to value Land value as if vacant Improvement value Part Take Photo of part taken Parcel Map Land Improvements Severance Damages Special Benefits Total Just Compensation Addenda A Market data map B Market data C Title report D .:ity of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Requirements E Ietter to Owner F Partial list of persons contdctee G Appraisers Qualifications 12 -85 -289 4,5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13,14 15 18 17 17 17 17 17 17 17,18 18 18,19 20 21 -23 24 25 26 27 28 29 29 29 �2 �o J4 r lok C) loor e INTR"!DUCTION Identification Of The Subject Property NAME OF OWNER: Archie D. Wilson and Betty Jean Wilson, husband and wife, as Joint tenants, by Deed recorded September 23, 1960, in Rook 5242, Page 433, Official Records LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 7074 Ramona Street, At' Loma, California 91701 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSOR PARCEL: 202- 181 -09 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The land referred to in this report is situated in the state of California, County of San Bernardino, and Is described as follows: The south } of lot 10, block 8, according to map of tract of land of the Cucamonga Homestead Association, in the County of San Bernardino, State of CaWbrni3, as per plat recorded In Book 6 of Maps. Page 46, Records of said county Excepting therefrom that portion convoyed to the County of San Bernardino by final order of condemnation recorded September 22, 1967, in Book 6894, Page 656, Official Records, described as follows: 12 -85 -289 PARCEL 1: THE WEST 75 OG FEET OF THE SOUTH Ij OF LOT 10, BLOCK 8, CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY EXCEPT THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WiTHIN THE SOUTHERN PACIFI-' RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY AS SET FORTH IN EASEMENT TO THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY BY DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 19, 1913, IN BOOK 528 OF DEEDS, PAGE 189, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY NOTE: THE EAST LINE OF SAIL' WEST 75 00 FEET BEING MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 10 4 INTRODUCTION IdentUtaaUon Of Subject Property LEGAL DESCRIPTION (cont'd) PARCEL 2: THE WEST 100 00 FFET OF THAT PORTION OF LOT 10, BLOCK S. CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LANDS, IN TH1 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS,PAGE 46, RECORDS Of SAID COUNTY, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY, AS DESCRIBED IN EASE51ENT TO THE PACIFIC RAILWAY ELECTRIC COMPANY BY DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 19, 1913, IN BOOK 528 OF DEEDS, PAGE 189, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. NOTE: THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 100.00 FEET BEING MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 10. AREA OF OWNERSHIP: 6 9 acres ZONING: Residential Approximately one half ti) of the subject is zoned 'M' (Medium Density Residential; 8 - 14 DU /AC), with the balance zoned 'LM' (Low to Medium Density Residential; 4 - 8 DUTAC) 12 -85 -289 5 INTRODUCTION Summary Of Estimated Values Value of the entire property In before condition: 5803,500.00 Less value o� the proposed takln : IAnd - $22,400.00 Improvements - $ 3.625.00 Total value of proposed tako - $ 26.025.00 Value of remainder as part of the whole: $777,475 00 Value of remainder In the aftsr condition: $777.475.00 Severance Dame as: $ 0 00 Special Beneflte_ $ 0 00 Total Just Compensation Value cf the Part Taken $ 2G,025 00 Net Curative Costs $ 1.500.00 Tom $ 27,525 00 12 -85 -289 6 0 INTRODUCTION Purpose and Deflnitious PURPOSF. This appraisal report and analysis has been prepared u the request of Doug Illays, Civil Engineer, L. D King, Inc , for the purpose of submitting an opinion of the fair market value of the fee simple estate rights, easement rights, severance damages and /or special benefits to remainder parcels, if any, proposed to be taken for the street widening of Arel tbald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California DEFINITIONS Market Value - The term value or market valve as used herein is defined as the amount In cash or terms reasonably equivalent to cash for which to all probability the property would be sold by a knowledgeable owner, wiMng but not obligated to sell, to a knowledgeable buyer who desires but is not obliged to buy Highest and Best Use - The moat prcf1table likely use to which a property can be put The opinion of such use may be based on the highest and most profitable continued use to which the property Is adapted and needed or likely to be In demand In the reasonably near future Fee Simple Es tat - An absolute fee, the fee ownership Interest, fee withm.t ' limitations to any particular class of heirs or restrictions, but subject to the limitations of eminent domain, escheat, police powers and taxation Easement - A nonpossessing interest held by one person In land of another j person whereby the first person is accorded partial use of such land for a specific purpose. An easement restricts but does not abridge the rights of the fee owner to the use and enjoyment of the easement holder's rights Severarce Damages - It Is the diminution of the market value of the remainder are -, -Fnihe case of a taking, which arises (a) by reason of the taking (severance) , or (b) the construction of the Improvement in the manner proposed Special Bepef(ts - Those benefits which accrue directly and solely to the 9 advantage of the property remaining after a partial taking 12- B5 -2b9 INTRODUCTION Aaeumptions and Lim(ting Conditions All of the data in this report Is correct to the best of our knowledge subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: Data, opinions and estimates have been gathered from various sources and the Information obtained is assumed to he correct. Lump sum or percentage adjustments of market data are employed only for the purpose of aiding the appraisers to arrive at an Indication of the value of the subject property Information provided by the property owners, parties to sales and others is assumed to be reliable but its accuracy Is not guaranteed. As with all adjustments, the appraisers' experience must be given primary reliance over a mathematical procedure since many factors In the marketplace cannot be measure with mathematical preciseness In the event court testimony is required, there will be an additional charge over and above the rate prescribed for the appraisal valuation. The appraisers assume no liability for legal matters, Including those affecting title to the property and its validity Title to the property is assumed to be marketable and free of encumbrances, Including but not limited to, delinquencies, liens, mortgages, security agreements and financing statements This appraisal report may not be reproduced without the written permission of the appraisers No fractional part of this appraisal is to be used in conjunction with another appraisal. Such use renders It invalid. The appraisers reserve the right to make such adjustments to the valuation herein reported as may be required by consideration of additional data or more reliable data that may become available. Appraising is not an exact sclenre The opinion of Fair Market Value made In this report can be different from the opinion of other appraisers 12 -85 -289 8 INTRODUCTION Certification We hereby certify that: We have no present or contemplated future interest In the real estate that Is the subject of this appraisal report We have no personal Interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of this appraisal report of the parties Involved To the best of our knowledge and belief the statements of fact contained In this appraisal report upon which the analyses. opinions and conclusions expressed herein are based are true and correct This appraisal report sets forth aU of the limiting conditions affecting the analyses. opinions and conclusions contained in this report This appraisal report has been made In conformity with and is subject to the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct of the American Institute of Real Estate Aprrabers. and the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisals i J. MH.LIAM KURPHY AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING APPRAISERS ' M1 cha�urphy 1' O 12 -85 -289 9 =i 4llt� S 00 VN c� Toloolp 1 1 1 1 I • ►ti � I l d• i • 1 Sin• �� � � (f. 9 1 ! if ft V • � 9 � ' 1 •�� { 4 p { r a�l a a_. �VO �l 11•liillll � j3`�3 jt;� � �� Ali !" � v �'{ � ° , . li► { 1 aW j{(i( �� �5�� � J• ` 1,�i � +� � ~ W /lt it yY'' C „` t i 1 �.• c . ��•ej Ml a �; 11��I � i ' • , ! � {•li ij. .1 '1 '� . "aj{ a {{ i a, .. �� {!� 11 a. �.�i ♦\!'•��S . 1 � d . ° 'C g o f ddd !q • OG It 1e Uji tj <j ►' y; !� t ,�� 1�.b `t:,:�r•'i °f tj c�� ,fib •1 ( � O� At in I� e DESCRIPTION Area Data San Bernardino County San Bernardino County is the largest county in the continental United States and Includes seventeen (17) Incorporated cities It's population of over one - million (1,000,Ooo) is concentrated In Southern California. Within sixty (50) miles of the county seat are the urban centers of L. s Angeles, Long Beach, and Orange County. Housln¢ The availability of houring for workers Is a major reaourve of importance to businesses considering San Bernardino County for a plant or facility location A wide range of home styles, prices, and locations are available In San Rernardino County Home prices range from twenty -five percent ('s5%) to forty percent (408) less than cemparablo homes In the counties of Los Angeles and Orange Locations vary from suburban residential subdivisions in the urban valley to estate developments In year round resort settings Transportation Cajon Pass from the north brings Union Pacific's main line and Interstate Fifteen (15) It also brings the Santa Fe Railroad and Interstate Forty (40) from the mid -west San Gorgonio Pass next to Palm Springs brings the Southern Pacific Railroad and Interstate Ten (10) from Texts 12 -85 -289 11 For air travel, there is Ontario International Airport it 1s the third largest airport In California for volume of freight and pt,ssengerr. Ontario International Airport is the only major facility In Southern California with significant - apaclty for exponsinn Recreation Regional parks provide open space and recreation fo: familles in urban areas. The mountains provide summer and wins +r recreation, Includini, several snow and ski r9sorts The lower deserts ano Colcmdo River provide many opportunities to enjoy nature Camping facilities are available in both the mountains and desert areas. Within an hours drive one can reach the Pacific Ocean and it's beaches. NEIGHBORHOOD MAP IITIAND _ I h_.1 —.1 _ _ o..�.r._ I 'I �r IONTANA rancho GUA.sn ONTARIO INURN ATIONAI AIRPORT J Rancho �ewmonga —� Ne. YOWNIr A.uN.0 i••% MY.ENIbYI YII C.n�iu.�YM U.w ,1WWt�r .Iw.ebv' IMM NwIM.w•.1 ,41.M Msfi•. C,!(hCeDIEhorhooA 6hoPPlK I.Nwo-.r. Iru.la..w ta.NSS. •....•.Iw o�.+rv.w Wy.l anch0I.w tMlfwa• M.IN.... N VM.w4. Mrfw. t4vf.. U t.Nf .rw44 I�..IhW e N.. +Iaw rl+lw icamomga t W-= IYWIy tMrtMw IOwLN+M 1 M•I.Mr W I+r. +v N Y Itwwrw t.s..(... 12 4N OAtN[t MOUNTAIN' IITIAND _ I h_.1 —.1 _ _ o..�.r._ I 'I �r IONTANA rancho GUA.sn ONTARIO INURN ATIONAI AIRPORT J Rancho �ewmonga —� Ne. YOWNIr A.uN.0 i••% MY.ENIbYI YII C.n�iu.�YM U.w ,1WWt�r .Iw.ebv' IMM NwIM.w•.1 ,41.M Msfi•. C,!(hCeDIEhorhooA 6hoPPlK I.Nwo-.r. Iru.la..w ta.NSS. •....•.Iw o�.+rv.w Wy.l anch0I.w tMlfwa• M.IN.... N VM.w4. Mrfw. t4vf.. U t.Nf .rw44 I�..IhW e N.. +Iaw rl+lw icamomga t W-= IYWIy tMrtMw IOwLN+M 1 M•I.Mr W I+r. +v N Y Itwwrw t.s..(... 12 DESCRIPTION Neighborhood Data RANCHO CUCAb1ONGA Rancho Cucamonga nestles In the foothills of Lice Los Angeles -Sat Bernardino basin, roughly lmif -way between those two cities and approximately 120 Idles north of San Diego Rancho Cucamonga covers 36 6 square miles at altitudes of 1,050 to 2,400 feet, between tl•e communities of Ontario, Fontana and Upland to the south, east and west, respectively To the north rises majestic Cucamonga Peak and Mount Baldy, nearly 9,000 feet high They are surrounded by the Cucamonga wilderness area of the San Gabriel Mountains Rancho Cucamonga enjoys Mediterranean -typo sunbelt weather with warm st.mmers and mild winters. The year -round temperature averages from 460 to 95° fahrenhelt. The northern reocl•is of the city on tare occasions have light frost and some summer days are he. and dry The average yearly rainfall of 15 -21 Inches occurs predominantly dt ring winter months and coastal breezes cool the summer nights Rancho Cucamonga was incorporated as a General lAw City in November, 1977. It employs 100 full -time employees and an average of 30 part -time employees on an annual budget of $20,000,000.00 under a Counsel /Manager form of a government. Since 1960, Rancho Cucamonga has increased it's population from 11,000 to over 64,000 residents Home seekers are otfored averything from apartments, mobile homes, condominiums, single family residences in every price range to exclusive equestrian ranches in the foothills Rancho Cucamonga is the home of 30 public and private elementary and secondary schools Chaffey College is a comprehensive, tuition free community college offering students over 100 academic and vocational degrees and licenses In addition, there are 25 other prestigious universities and colleges, 43 - hurches of every denomination, and over 125 active chapters of various clubs and organizations all within a short dr ve Rancho Cucamonl(a's transportution needs are served by the foltowing: Highways tnterstato 10 (San Bernardino Freeway, east arcs west); Intersta a t5 (Devora Freeway, north and south); State Higlways 30 (proposed t'oo hill Freeway), 60 (Pomona Freeway), and 66 also serves the community Roll - The main track of the Santa Fe Railroad bisects the city, and has extensive reciprocal switching arrangements with Union Pacific and Southern Pacific Railroads which run adjacent to the city Truck - There are 15 -20 freight lines in Rancho Cucamonga and adjacent areas serving all trsnsmnUmmntal polrts Overnight delivery Is available to San Diego, San Francisco, Northern California, Arizona and Notada 12 -85 -289 13 [1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 �a Transportation (cont'd) DESCRIPTION Neighborhood Data Air - Ontario International Airport with its recently constructed runway for j wide body aircraft is at the southern boundary of Rancho Cucamonga. The 1,463 acre airport serv)cid 1,805,383 passengers in 1981, and three million passengers In 1984 It is expected that ONT will serve twelve million passengers by 1990. OST is In the process of constructing a new terminal building This termlrel will be built in two phases, the first phase to be IN completed by 1988 The service area of ONT, Southern California's major growth airport, covers eastern Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County and Riverside County This will be further increased by spillover from Orange County Airport and Los Angeles International Airport (LAX). both are currently at over 90 percent capacity Besides ONT, there are also three exclusively general aviation airports 10 to 20 minutes away from Rancho Cucamonga. Water - The deep -w, ter ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach are just an hour away. ' Buses - The Omnitrans system operates three regional mass transit lines, a paratransit system, and a dial- a-ride system in Rancho Cucamonga for commuters and locals, with connections to transcontinental carriv - nearby 12 -85 -289 14 4 � < ' �t � ru•r v. I` y •rlrtN r9_ I• F ' N 1 - O M `� v IJ riD u Y o let 10 - • a 15 If v '14L SUBJECT PLAT MAP t t it 9 L •Afi O Yi© O `% f r J O R -mow. ... i N I IC. ;1 0. a we". Q M to N R �z W M >i ' g:•• ;c� Ion • n. 10 OI Hnl W.Arnn TIIII Company OI N.rnvdlM nunllOUiWma 13 aD1 MIA I6n11 &LECIUlorwu0. aat rrw w,r oxnra a anuu uwlD3 3. 15 M to N R �z W M >i 4 1 SUB3ECT PHOTO 1 j y L i 1 F ' View of Single Family Residence and Citrus Farm looking West from Ramona Street Taken January 1986 by Michael S. Murphy f,• 12 -83 -289 16 �i ;n; DESCR.TPTION Subject Data LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 7074 Ramona Street, Alta Loma, California 91701 AREA OF OWNERSHIP. 6 9 acres SHAPE AND STREET ACCESS: The subject is rectangularly shaped, with approximately 250 feet of frontage on Archibald Avenue and Ramona Street, and a depth of 1,200 feet, more or less. These estimates are based on San Bernardino County Assessor 11(ap's, not an actual survey Ramona Street Is asphalt paved, with a dedicaed width of 60 feet. Archibald Avenue Is asphalt paved, with a dedicated width of 100 feet UTILITIES: Currently, the property is serviced by electric (Southern California Edison Company), gas (Southern California Gas Company), telephone (General Telephone of California), and water (Cucamonga County Water District) TOPOGRAPHY: The site Is mostly level, slightly below streut grade ZONING: Residential Approximately one half Q) of the subject is zoned 'A1' (Medium Density Residential; 8 - 14 DU /AC), with the balance zoned 'L111' (Low to bledlum Density Residential; 4 - 8 DU /AC) IDIPROVIMIENTS: The subject Is improved with a 1600 sq ft. single family residence, detached garage, concrete pipe /stand irrigation system and an estimated 600 citrus trees (606 navel oranges /436 valencia oranges; trees are approximately 30 years old). The build!ng schematic on the nert page describes the size, construction and condition of the subject improvements: 12 -85 -289 17 III I 1 1; j'. I51PROVEAIENTS (cont'd) DESCRIPTION Subject Data Building Schematic (not to scale) -20'- N Garage -10' Dilapidated wood 1600 sq ft. single family residence (2) Ben - garago with dirt rooms, (1) bath, dtning 6 living rcoa, wall to floor 200 sq ft wall carpet, some chestnut and ash paneling, Condition: Poor 320- woodburning fireplace Construction: Woos, sid- ing, raised wood floors, asphalt shingle roof Actual age: Estimated 60 years. Effective age: Estimated 30 years. Condition: Good Residence PRESENT USE: The present use for the subject property Is agricultural as a citrus farm The owner, Air Wilson, indicated that he has been raising oranges for the past twenty -five years, with sixty percent of his crop In navel oranges and the remaining forty percent in valencla's He xnintalns, harvests and markets the oranges himself HIGHEST AND BEST USE: While the s:te has a long history in agricul'ure, current trends in the market place indicate a change from agricultural uses to residential and commercial uses Contiguous ownerships located north and east of the sutject are either developed residential, or new residential under construction. To the south of the subject is a higher density residential development, with commercial development further south and to tl:e west The present zoning of the subject Is for both medium ivsidentlel (8 to 14 units per gross acre maximum) and low -to- medium residential (4 to 8 units per gross acres maximum% A planner from the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Alan Warren, explained that the density units per acre depends cn the standards of development used by the developer. The city trade Includes "Basic 12 -85 -289 18 INTRODUCTION Subject Data HIGHEST AND BEST USE (cont'd) Development Standards" and "Optional Development Standards ". To achieve 14 units per acre in 'M' zoned property, a developer would need to use the ' Optional Deve!opment Standards along with a very creative development plan zo get city approval (A copy cf the Residential Development Code for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is included in the addenda.) 1 Due to the active residential development in the general area, and the present zoning of the subject property, the Highest and Beat Use for the subject property 13 for residential development. e i fl ;l rI t� l� i 12 -85 -289 19 a� a� �o VALUATION THREE APPROACHES TO VALUE Thu Cost Approach An estimation of the replacement cost of the Improvements; deducting therefrom the estimated depreclation; and then sdding the value of the lend (as if vacant), as es,Immted by use of the blanket Data Approa ^.h The Income Approach Anticipated net Income estimated from the market is processed to indicate the capital amount of the investment which produces the net Inmma The Market Approach Prices paid in actual market transactions of similar recently sold properties are correlated and analyzed for an estimate of value of the subject Due to the highest and best use of the subject, for sidential development, the existing citrus trees attribute little or no value to the subject land It Is our opinion that the present value or Income generated by the citrus trees at,d irrigation lines are offset by the cost of their removal. With the exception of the single family residence, our appraisal analyses consists of a valuation of land as If vacant For this reason, while all the apprraches to value were Lvinsidered in valuing the larger parcel, the Market Data Apy.oach was relied upon to estimate the value of the land as if vacant The contributory value of the residence was based on the Cost Approach While .ne citrus trees do not contribute toward the highest and best use of the subject, new development should be able to work around or incorpnrate the existing structure 12 -85 -289 20 VALUATION Land Value As If Vacant According to Assessor Parcel hap 202- 181 -09, the subject land consists of 6 9 acres. The City of Rancho Cucamonga panning and zoning maps Indicate that the west one -half of the pro rt 3.45 acres frontin¢ on Archfbaid Avenue is onned or Me u --3I m iEesi3i•nlfel 9 ens ty units per acre vuudmuml the remaining U. ror trus reason, a to arrive at an overall the whole The sales data Included with the report occurred sufficiently near in time and involved properties which are in reasonable proximity to, sufficiently alike In character, situation, usability, adaptability and size to be comparable to the property subject of this appraisal The prices paid or to be paid In these sales do, in our judgment, reflect the market price level In the area and are helpful In estimating the value of the subject of this appraisal The following chart provides a synopsis of the sales used in our report: Sales Chart No Date ] Price Siza(AC.) P /P /S.P. Zoning 1 07/25/85 $1,500,000 10 69 $ 3 22 Hod-Re-(8-14 UA) 2 07/13/84 $ 728,500 20 15 S 83 V -L -Ros (< 2 UA) 3 07/12/84 $ 319,500 6 24 $ 1 16 11 Low-Re. (2 -4 UA) 4 01/31/84 $4,000,000 70 70 S 1 30 Low -Rea (2 -4 UA) Sales Discussion Sale No. 1 is located 1J miles south of subject on the southeas, corner of Turner Avenue and Arro-. Route In Rancho Cucamonga It was sold July 25, 1985 for $1,500,000, refle:ting $3 22 per sq.ft The 10 69 acres is somewhat level, sloping from north to routh At the time of sale, the property was vacant. It Is zoned Medium Resld•_ntlal (8 - 14 units /acre) and has been approved for 150 units Adjustments were made for density units per acre After adjustments, the estimated value of the subject based on Sale No. 1 is : 3 45 acres zoned "Af" - $460,000 00 ($3 19 sq ft.) 3 45 acres zoned "LM"- $285,000.00 ($1 90 sq ft.) Total Estimated Value: $765,000 00 12 -85 -289 71 I� ' VALUATION ' Lend Value An If Vecant Sales Discussion (cont'd) Salo No. 2 consists of 20.15 acres 2; miles northwest of the subject on the west side ­oT —Carnellen Avenue, north of Vicars Drive, Rancho Cucamonga The property 1s located In the foothill area and slopes sharp!y north to south The purchase price was 5728,500, reflecting o 83 per sq ft It is zoned Very Low Residential (less ' than 2 units per acre) The property was vacant at the time of sale Adjustments were made for time of sole, the superior view of the sale, and the superior location, topography and zoning of the subject. After adjustments, the estimated value of the 1, subject based on Sale No 1 Is 3 45 acres zoned "Fl" - $493,000.00 ($3 28 sq.ft ) ' 3 45 acres zoned "L1l "- $300,000.00 ($2 00 nq.ft.) Total Estimated Value: $793,000 00 -' Sale No. 3 is located on the south side of Banyan Avenue east of Archibald Avenue, one mile north of the subject property The sale comprises 6.24 acres and sold July 12, 1984 for $319,500, reflecting $1 18 per sq.ft Property slopes from north to scuth. It is zoned Law Residential (2 - 4 units /acre) At time of sale it was vacant except for citrus trees The site was approved for 19 units Adjustments were made for time of sole, and the superior location and zoning of the subject After adjustments, the estimated value of the subject based on Salo No. 1 is 3.45 acres zoned "AI" - $466,000.00 ($3 30 sq.ft ) } 5 45 acres zoned "L52 "- $270.000.00 %$1 80 sq.ft ) Total Estimated Value: $736,000.00 Sale No. 4 consisting of 70.70 acres, sold for $4,000,000 January 31, 1984, reflecting S) 30 per sq ft The topography Is varied, sloping from north to south. It was vacant at time of sale Sale No. 4 is located one mile east of subject on the northwest corner of Southern Pacific RR 5 Deer Creek Flood Control Channel ' Adjustments were made for time of sale, and the superior location and zoning of the subject After adjustments, the esttmated value of the subject based on Sale No 1 Is 3.45 acres zoned "Ill" - $473,000 00 (t3 15 sq- ft-) 3.45 acres zoned "Lill- $280.000.00 ($1.86 sq ft.) Total Estimated Value: 5753,000.00 ■ The following chart provides a summary of the estimated value of the subject land ri as If vacant based on market data sales (1) through (4) 12 -85 -289 22 Sales Discussion (cont'd) VALUATION land Value As If Vacant SALES SINHM CHART No Sub Ac M Pro Rata Sub Ac LM Pro Reta Eat. Tot. Val 1 3 45 ac. $3.19 of 3.45 or $1.90 of $765,000.00 2 3 45 ac. $3..3 of 3.45 ac. $2 00 of $793,000.00 3 3 45 ac $3 30 of 3.45 ac. $1.8n •f $736,000.00 4 3.45 ac. $3.15 of 3 45 ac. $1 86 of $753,000 00 Conclusion The adjusted sales show a range In pro-rata value for medium residential zoned land of $3 10 per sq. at to $3.28 per sq ft The range in value for low to medium zoned land Is $1.80 to $2 00 per square foot Sale number (1) was •naidered to be the most comparable to the subject. Also taken into consideration was a current Listing of "LM" zoned property on the NEC of 19th Street and Hermosa The 10 54 acres Is currently listed for $1 54 per sq ft ,. with inferior location to the subject. After considering the pertinent data available to the appraiser as well as general factors in the marketplace and our experience in real estate, the final estimate of value of the subject land as if vacant Is: 3 45 acres of "At" zoned land 0 $3 19 per a f.- $480,000.00 3 45 acres of "Lhl" zoned land 0 $I 85 per e f - $280.000.00 TOTAL - $760,000.00 12 -85 -285 23 VALUATION haprovaaec[ Valuation Schedule ITEM EST.COST NEW 6 GOOD DEFRFCIATED VALUE 1600 single family residence $52,000 00 606 $43,200 00 200 s f glrsge $ 1,500 00 106 L- 150.00 TOTAL ESTDtATED VALUE SUBJECT 110ROWIEN17 S: $43,500.0 (R) RECAPITULATIQ,'j TOTAL ESTIMATED VALUE OF SUBJECT WiD: $760,000.00 TOTAL ESTWATED VALUE SUBJECT WROVEMEN'f : $ 43.500.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE LARGER PARCEL: $803,500.00 EIGHT HUNDRED THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED .%ND NOI100 DOLLARS 12 -85 -289 24 �9 E 0)�- Ay o� Colo) PART TAKE PHOTO View of Part Take looking South from the Northwest corner of Subject Property Taken January 1986 by Michael S. Murphy 12 -83 -289 25 EXHIBIT "B" PARCEL MAP 0 b O 1 D O 4 LOUE LOT 10 -- . /rt ARCHIBALD AVE • Q • RN. PER DOC Q!%. pea 00C 1D 9L0¢D8 19. L RO0 OF w 526 620 AG 1 'ACE 189, OF OFICILL tECORD3 Y I 2 n 1 � q u I t O o ,6 SOUTU " OF LOT 10. 6 J 5L 85T5.4 • ?UDS PER BOOt6 � I OF MAPS, PAGE 46 � u� iW QJ W 6u 2LL - 7WWIDE STRIPOF LAND (PARCEL I) C04VEYED TO THE CODUTY OF 9AU BERLNROINO BY ORDER OF COUDEUU4TIOU RECORDED Sam 22. 1967, 1U BOOK 4594.PAGE 654. OF OPFICIAL RECORDS. WWIDB SLOPE EASCMEMT —106 WIDE STRIPOF LAUD (rARCEL 2) CONVEYEOTO TN8 COUMTY OF SAM BERUARDWO BY ORDER OF C040EMMATION RECORDED SEPT 22,1947. IU BOOK 6894. PAGE S&S. OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 26 ..OT TO 6ULC I Q O 1D 26 ..OT TO 6ULC I PART TAKE Lena Description The land proposed to be taken for the Archibald Avenue street widening is a twenty -five foot (25') wide strip of land along the west side of the subject property Also Included is an additional six foot (6') wide strip of land for a slope easement The part take and slope easement are legally described as follows: A portion of the south half of Lot 10, Block 8, according to Alap of Tract of Land of the Cucamonga Homestead Association Lends, in the County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recordtd In Boat. 6 of Maps, page 46, Records of said County, more particularly described as follows: The west 106 00 feet of the south hKlf of let 10, Block 8, in sidd County and State, as per plat recorded in Book 6 of blaps, page 40, Records of said County NOTE: The east lire of said west 106 00 feet being measured at right angles to and parallel with the west Bne of said Lot 10. Excepting therefrom that portion conveyed to the County of San Bernardino by Final Order of Condemnation recorded September 22, 1967, In Book 6894, page 656, Official Records. Total Areas: Part Take - 6,250 square feet Slope Easement - 1,500 square feet Land Values Value of the part take as estimated by the pro rata value of "At" zoned land as taken from Lhe larger parcel valuation Is estimated to be $3.20 per square foot. Value of the rights taken for the slope easement Is estimated at 500 or $1 60 per square foot, considering that the owner still will retain partla) use of the land after the construction of the proposed Improvements These land values are sununarized as follows: Part Take (6,250 0 $3 20 )= $20,000 00 Slope Easement (1,500 0 $1 60)= $ 2.400.00 TOTAL $22,400.00 12 -85 -289 27 Description ITEM (17) Slature Orange trees (0 $125 00 es) 230 lineal feet of 12" concrete irrigation line with Il concrete cap stands 0tolo .I+ PART TAKE Improvements EST. COST NEW GOOD $ 2,125.00 1001 $ 3,000.00 501 SUMIARY OF VALUE OF PART TARE Land Improvements TOTAL ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE PART TAKE Curative Costs DEPRFCIATED VALUE $ 2,125.00 $ 1.500.00 $ 3,625.00 $22,409.00 S 3.625.00 $26,025.00 Due to the present use of the property as a citrus farm, the irrigation line that IL included in the part taken will have to be replaced In order to prevent double payment, the amount set forth under improvements as the depreciated value of the irrigation Line and stands, is deducted from the replacement cost new Computations are as follows: DESCRIPTION COST NEW LESS DEP. VALUE NET CURATIVE DAMAGES Irrigation line and stands $3,000 00 $1,500 00 $1,500.00 12.85 -289 78 1 PART TARE Severance Damages The proposed taking will not create a sovered parcel of land or Irregularly shaped parcel The existing present use and highest and best use will not be affected ny the proposed improvements. It is our opinion therefore that there are no apparent severance damages as a result of the proposed taking Spocial Benofits The widening of Archibald Avenue has affected the general area as a whole and doesn't represent a special benefit to the subJact property Therefore, no special benefits are found. Value of the Part Taken Net Curative Costs Total 12 -85 -289 Total Just Compensation 29 $26,025.00 $ 1.500.00 $27,525.00 .qJ�� z� 9 � SALES DlAP � r 1 A LTA LOMA Sale ,9 ._+ •� ff - 2-- •T.-.' 1 � 1�-. 1 �.1` '- `�' � � ... y �' 111 j' IIT, 11 ' �Q.'� = �,�Y'•Z I— • Yff IEI •1�) i�.f" IT — - •• -.-I- = i _._ -r -. , i - �._.. . ^, -.: vie= y ::la.:: _ _� ee__. ..e::..:a a :::: :•. -•' -a. :::.•S,j- -IF _: "� 1�'�.�, -i p �. .� �1 .R. =, •. •.i ,'�, _� j � _ E�1 •_ E t 1 iii:; .SL�tit�i Sale 4 SUBJECT •" ' '' %i� C t� I i e.= ! I. s !/ rte �� f .. -r.—., i/,.. t .. •• ���. , Re r- �. �� 1•�� k l it ��...::��I "7 `t` , {f{i�('erE�• �ii'� �:i�_�vl �i_'" �� , TERRA" .'. j f!• 1 1 _- •L:-W� ��l e r�� 1 � 1- � � '�S<�.y/ .� i CUCAMONGA tL ,•.:.t Sala 1 J F 2� 9 �jl MARKET DATA NO. I c K riff 4. Y 4 i` I t Taken January 1986 by Mlchael S. Murphy Rx Narlh CucW4MP rowmm.M a 13/13 tin. 4wr.�•• 4b ain v IY ti.1 4•s T,cd Na 2248, AL B. 34/63 uov � ® �'1� J r •an I/i4ati � TI 1 ,r•.� -Yro• 1 • It 1 0 1 LOA 1 M ae 1 4i 1 Y 1 1 1 12 -85 -289 ''r i MARX82 DATA NO. 1 DATE OF SALE: 07 -25 -85 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.: 209. 091 -11 LOCATION: SEC TURNER & ARROW ROUTE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS (SEE GRANT DEW LAND AREA: ACRES: 10.69 SO.FT.: 465,656 ZONING: M (RES 8-14 U) PRESENT USE: VACANT UTILITIES: Matra Y Gas: Y Elaetrlelty: Y Telephone: Y Sewer: Y TOPOGRAPHY: S01fl0UT LEVEL, SLOPING N TO S IMPROVEMENTS: VACANT GRkVTOR: CROWELL CATMILL CORPORATION GRANTEE: PURCHASE PRICE: $1,500,000.00 PRICE PER ACRE: $140,3 PRICE PER SQ.. FT.: $3.22 TERMS: MIA VERIFICATION: GRANTOR REKARKS: PROPtRTY )3PROVED FOR 150 UNITS 11111 t..11 eM1 nl \NlM lllhl\ .wl .l d'.'1•^. ..•aWl 1>D✓61 lalau/. M.1.t1\I 4Ml tarA4tiv.. 4111m4 4tr.rN 1« A fit. a Y.1..'1u.r. ..... ..t r 41J.nu 4 1. IN 01111..1 tM (w.l. YI.I«I. N. 0.118 A 1 111 It..ra .J .ne1J tr. Lr tY Ilwlwnll.t.w.«N♦ .N «.tM. a ! tr u.. N sN...aa m.. 1. «.w n. • n r r.....JIP IIU .I tL Uw d 4111.n1.. MIO m r trllw.l.1 N. Iw/ ylpy 1�11/}/Itl. . 41Jmu 4wn11w /...1 vf►rYr.• w I m.nv NU iL wP if If, A .I..w w..sTl.wl•✓C1•�1l4 rP wwr,.tww F .....w.wr.rw...w.t. 11.�.•w.t.�r«.Pw w.w�IP � /ww.✓.w "W tW1M in.- \w 1.\ M.1.i \I. 1w IYI. P.. F I....O •. �.•• • w • � 1 r •r_•ns�.rne •..' � rasarss : • ��� pYMn. X111. r4m/ mrowno ... r Ilotpaali,m Iknnl Wed fb wM.l.l .•Y.� M iY 4. w... r r..Y. r. nr.., .rb Orl r• •r U .lnl . 4 1✓ N M. b ... .1 . .. ....n.�... ....r.I i fit. a Y.1..'1u.r. ..... ..t r 41J.nu 4 1. IN 01111..1 tM (w.l. YI.I«I. N. 0.118 A 1 111 It..ra .J .ne1J tr. Lr tY Ilwlwnll.t.w.«N♦ .N «.tM. a ! tr u.. N sN...aa m.. 1. «.w n. • n r r.....JIP IIU .I tL Uw d 4111.n1.. MIO m r trllw.l.1 N. Iw/ ylpy 1�11/}/Itl. . 41Jmu 4wn11w /...1 vf►rYr.• w I m.nv NU iL wP if If, A .I..w w..sTl.wl•✓C1•�1l4 rP wwr,.tww F .....w.wr.rw...w.t. 11.�.•w.t.�r«.Pw w.w�IP � /ww.✓.w "W tW1M in.- \w 1.\ M.1.i \I. 1w IYI. P.. F I....O •. �.•• • w • � 1 r MARKET DATA NO.2 Taken 7anuary 1986 by Michael S. Murphv Por CllmmooV WMStrad Association, US 6/46 m 17� 4 r. 12 -85 -289 Tc N l µ 1061 15007 .I.1 w �I %I ;. MARKET DATA NO. 2 DATE OF SALE[ 07 -13 -84 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.: 1061- 221 -01 LOCATION: W/S CARARLIAN N OF VICARA DR. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C LEGAL DESCRIPTION[ (SEE GR.1hr DEZD) LAND AREAL ACRES[ 20.15 SQ.FI.t 877.730 ZONINGt VL (RES 2 U) PRESENT USEt VACANT UTILITIES[ Watert y Cast y Elartrieityt y Telephone: y Sewer: y TOPOGRAPHYt SHARP N TO S SL40PEl IN FOOTHILLS IMPROVEMENTS: VACANT GRANCORt HILLSIDE VISTA INVSIMENr GR&NTEEt PLAZA BUILDERS INC PURCHASE PRICE[ PRICE PER ACREt PRICE PER SQ. FT.: TERNS: VERIFICATION: 0 i a n..r�.frr.rvwlrt o.�Iner.r•. �lys -- _ li Ir.rl�Y yrrygwf r'1 r IArr�Ylrrll .l)r.rruarrY��r�rrrl► 1 Iu...rwrcl Moor �S fONA)1W yt2cv�o \na+..rrww.r.wr�.rrr NISts1It IWA ISkpttf M. q. Ornal a.4�wrw �.rrwrr Yrr ultra elf. `\ r.r CaAFllr PLAZA SUILCM. lK.. • crilf"l• CWW'tl" r w.q.er ry�fNr city M SI11c11p cAtawftlo.. ta.r SM wfrlYlr rrtr..r lot 10. Slxt P Cwwggl I JWW Yltt Mtlw SLIM. M w city M amm [Kt.Ope taunt Of SM INIVIfaI. IMM of 411f"l•. •I w rp 1'IDiJrO le bOt 1 hM N IUDs 111 t, Effltl .f 0. [YKy wlO.tlt Of Mid CY y py M/ D Irf NI SS 1St\ iRfIS. C I P� .t.M M 1.1I. /eu y . w IYIr IMI.T 11 W.r • ^ Q/ rr4 �rY r•Ir�rr iLS.NC t � +rr�.rr.r.�rr�r1 Llarv�.It♦ O ASIAN I � �. rrrr.rrrrr�•rr .�. wnr �r.rrtalr r w ,1 S WOMAN N�lCl 9 M Yjrwlilii.7�a wr, q � rm i IM! As rlrc n..r�.frr.rvwlrt o.�Iner.r•. �lys -- _ li Ir.rl�Y yrrygwf r'1 r IArr�Ylrrll .l)r.rruarrY��r�rrrl► 1 Iu...rwrcl Moor �S fONA)1W yt2cv�o \na+..rrww.r.wr�.rrr NISts1It IWA ISkpttf M. q. Ornal a.4�wrw �.rrwrr Yrr ultra elf. `\ r.r CaAFllr PLAZA SUILCM. lK.. • crilf"l• CWW'tl" r w.q.er ry�fNr city M SI11c11p cAtawftlo.. ta.r SM wfrlYlr rrtr..r lot 10. Slxt P Cwwggl I JWW Yltt Mtlw SLIM. M w city M amm [Kt.Ope taunt Of SM INIVIfaI. IMM of 411f"l•. •I w rp 1'IDiJrO le bOt 1 hM N IUDs 111 t, Effltl .f 0. [YKy wlO.tlt Of Mid CY y py M/ D Irf NI SS 1St\ iRfIS. C I P� .t.M M 1.1I. /eu y . w IYIr IMI.T 11 W.r • ^ Q/ rr4 �rY r•Ir�rr iLS.NC t � +rr�.rr.r.�rr�r1 Llarv�.It♦ O ASIAN I � �. rrrr.rrrrr�•rr .�. wnr �r.rrtalr r 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 p 1 1 MARKET DATA NO.3 31 s M Taken January 1936 by Miducl S. Murphy ib L� rill htmw L Irt MY am ml �� iY m-= I ,t. MARKET DATA 140. 3 DATE OF SALEt 07 -12 -84 ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.: 201- 251-63.64 LOCATION: S/S BANYAN. E OT ARCHIRALD. RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA LEGAL DESCRIPTION% (SEE GRANT DEED) LAND AREAL ACRES% 6.24 SQ.PT.t 271.814 ZONING% L (RES 2 -4 U) PRESENT USEt VACANT UTILITIES Water: Y Gas: Y Electricity: Y Telephone; Y Severs Y TOPOGRAPHY: SLOPES N TO S D(PROVEM94TS: CITRUS TREES GRANTORt BOMKNNO. DONALD V. ET AL GRANTEES LIGHTNER. GEORGE A. PURBASE PRICEt $319.500.00 PRICE PER ACRES $51.201.92 PRICE PER SQ. FT., $1.18 TIT -uSt CASH VERIFICATION: GRAN REMARKSs SITE APPROVED TOR 19 UNITS ■e �Fi I' Is F r ►� 314At Imo. +�►! JIB � Y C O IMr�l1�� w ■ ., J YMr O�{e 1111cr W. � m r1\ L tom. W Yii ttl. YJ. Vtl}J.. 4III'lks t.t .r uont.e �sllm t a¢umc �• J W MwNle •� � IJIw. m altar •\• mlart mom. m ImP m tm\ m a\.nm Ir.. WDIRIa ) N. IM. m� +.o mAM.j• �iiJ�Mr� AwJ.YNV� alp Iwar w "di�� w ! rc rlaro t..�.r.ry �M ryI .�(,M1'tr. 1Y) V/1 J.n .\ Fll..ly .N . b• I.m f O\ Yll YrL N J \. R Tl�.ri• • 9 ri. Wr• .AtY ri.YL.. 1 1 r . r •r i1 T ' S X116 Dolt a. it u 11, w.wn Y 11141k M of a". M/(.) M, rwr d rlt ti.ra. U-MLIO aNa.bw 41..YaIY'11 I11.0 MI r*r . NW 111.00 Mr AIMMIlM. W, r rr.a r ry..gW M IM ..rtt Ll.. of ..Y ar 11. a. w.O-M w rMdl ^ft Mal r W Yrtrll) I11..a w rIM •0.N/r%1 . Y10 10.M M.l r Ill."aw 0k 1r1YY rti �w r adow .dM. M w . % W r .dt M St. W "m t.0." I..t rrr i.lM t w Il .t&% .yM M ab .1 IIY it ..1t W it. M.1 \. 1. •'Litt d .1 Mr 9%... W ron /Ye—. –1' uwr V YrM. tlr . Wlll 10 Nn Y L$0 . Wrll 140.1 Iw. r 1.. It M h.lpll 11w14u hall OYYg4 RYf ft. f. u a.1'1.. r«..M 1. Mr A.I an.. Ma. M. rY.rM d .au f ... MA l i 1 MARKET DATA No. • .+� Taken Unuary 1926 by Michael S. Murphy S Vt Sr x T Rl1Ey'Af StlE mK a... c....r. r y tr nno ar DATE OF SALE: ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.: LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LAND AREA: 20NMGt PRESENT use: UTILITIES: Water: Gas: Electricltyt Talephanet Severt TOPOGRAPHY: INPROMENTS t GRANTOR: GRANTEEt PURCHASE PRICE: PRICE PER ACRE: PRICE PER SQ. 1?.$ 'Imis s VERIelCATION: ;L t. . 3;i c-r, MARKET DATA NO. 4 01-31 -84 202 - 221 -22 NHC SOUTHERN PACIFIC RR S DEER CREEK FLOOD CNTRL (SEE GRANT DEED) ACRES: 70.70 SQ.FT.t 3,079,692 L (RES 2 -4 U) VACANT Y Y Y Y Y VARIEDt SLOPES N TO S VACANT WEST END INVESTHrr,,s BARCLAYS TAG $4, ::,000 00 S ,577 09 $1.30 ilm r t Am ws AA Ann 'A L J Tr WA•.Wwfr•— rltr'er' A,r•�rrr_r.. .... 1 1 rerrr• R Y.rr r Td rrgri r a �r.r.rr.w.rrr�r+rrrrrrrr 1 lyr••rrrrat yfa�r tR . YY.VAttA tp�ATgr,�ll Mir rrrrY W�r}L Oi tfID fl7tl11lttr LTD., • LfYlrt �r��tr.rarrr Yrr hlCtenL y1DAARRr AtAOJ1Tt TAC, • Talltenl• Drr•nl ►•[Trtitri► r•rrt �rrrlwrnrr City of MAere COC&M"•, C .lr $• Mfo•Tlloo L..4u man M.,., MACK ,n mMS1TT •A• ATM= wmm Alm m Tilt wr.wuia noon TM 80 AM -.u, Ir•.rAN \. RAftp C410AF4 � a y,t _/yyY_vlp /.� lUUrflp •r rrsaNl! (1-VliQ1•N _1• r Arrrrr N. Irl tr,.• s r r.rC . rr AYr r r I.r Tm� r r.•�rl rl�l ee. rw ±i rea _l tip Q. Lr rorrrf.Yrr rY W �lrrr rr�r Grr.rrror. r�•rrr r�ar•wyr ��M� r_rrlrr�r�lrr_ twr��r irlr•t �.� •�.• r.rl r rr� ar �rrrr�rr �� r=nano r r•ow now 9 0 AH1R�C e L D KING, INC 2151 EAST °D° STREET. SUITE 120A ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA 6-1764 ATTENTION. DOUG MAYS YOUR REFERENCE, 202 - 101 -09 OUR ORDER NO. 837159 DATE AS OF DECEMBER 6, 1984 AT 7130 A M r 837159 THE FORM OF POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS REPORT 1S, THIS REPORT IS NOT COMPLETE UNLESS IT INCLUDES A PRINTED COVER SETTING FORTH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, A LIST OF THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS FOR THE POLICY FORMES) ABOVE DESIGNATED - _ ---------- TOM ZOWA TITLE OFFICER THIS ESTATE OR 1NTEPEST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT 1S, A FEE TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF 1S VESTED 1N, ARCHIE D UILSON AND BETTY JEAN WILSON, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AS JOINT TENANTS. BY DEED RECORDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1960, IN BOOK 5242. PAGE 433, OFFICIAL RECORDS PAGE 1 M L, L C 837159 THE IAND REFERRLO TO IN THIS REPORT 15 SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND 1S DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, THE SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 10, BLOCK 8, ACCORDING TO MAP OF TRACT OF LAND OF THE :UCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN 3ERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTv. EXCEPTING I EREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNAROlt :O BY FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 22, 1967. IN BOOK 6894, PAGE 656, OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, PARCEL 1, THE WEST 75 OD FEET IF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 10, BLOCK 8, CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY EXCEPT THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF WAY AS SET FORTH IN EASEMENT TO THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILUAY COMPANY BY DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 19, 1913, IN BOOK 528 OF DEEDS, PAGE 189, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. NOTE, THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 7: 00 FEET BEING MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 30 PARCEL 2, THE WEST 100 00 FEET OF 1HAT PORTION OF LOT 10, BLOCK 8, CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LANDS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PEP PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RIGHT OF U4Y, AS DESCRIBED IN EASEMENT TO THE PACIFIL ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY BY DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 19. 1913, IN BOOK 528 OF DEEDS, PAGE 189, IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY NOTE, THE EAST LINE OF SAID VEST 100 00 FEET BEING MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 10 PAGE 2 AWL,,, r 837159 tAT THE DATE HEREOF EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS, ' 1, GENERAL AND SPECIAL TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1984 -85, FIRST INSTALLMENT, $297 43 SECOND INSTALLMENT, $297.41 CODE 15004, LINE 202 181 09 TAX BILL NO., 840187610 ' 2, THE LIEN OF SUPPLEMENTAL TAXES ASSESSED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER ' 498, STATUTES OF 1983 OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 3, 1 AN EASEMENT FOR THE HEREINAFTER SET FORTH SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED IN BOOK 528, PAGE 189, OF DEEDS SAID EASEMENT 1S FOR RAILROAD PURPOSES AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, ' A PORTION OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF LOT 10, BLOCK B OF THE TRACY OF LANDS OF THE CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION, AS PER MAP RECORuEO ON PAGE 46, IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS. IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS BEING ALL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF ABOVE MENTIONED LOT 10, ..YING SOUTHERLY OF A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 40 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED SURVEYED CENTER LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY, TO WIT, BEGINNING AT ENGINEERS STATION 2098 +84.79 OF THE SURVEYED CENTER LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY, SAID STATION BEING IN THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SAID LOT 10, DISTANT NORTHERLY 41 30 FEET, MORE OR LC", 'Z. r, -nM THE SOUTHEEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 101 THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING, NORTH 88 DEG. 52' 300 EAST, 1,323 39 FEET TO ENGINEERS STATION 2112 +08.18 OF THE SURVEYED CENTER LINE OF THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC ' RAILWAY, SAID STATION BEING IN THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SAID LOT 10, AND NORTHERLY, 58.49 FEET, MORE OR LESS, FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10. PAGE 3 837159 SA10 EASEMENT UAS CONVEYED TU THE PACIFIC ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY A CORPORATION BY SUCH DOCUMENT a NOTE, THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY IS NOW THE OWNER AND HOLDER OF SAID EASEMENT REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THE RECORD OF SAID DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER AA3 OTHER PARTICULARS 4s AN EASEMENT FOR THE HEREINAFTER SF' FORTH SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED IN BOOK 2247, PAGE 433, OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAID EASEMENT IS FOR PIPE LINES AND CANNOT BE LOCATED FROM THE RECORD aA,ID EASEMENT WAS CONVEYED TO HERMOSA WATER COMPANY BY SUCH ' DOCUMENT. REFERENCE 1S HEREBY MADE TO THE RECORD OF SAID DOCUMENT FOR 1 FURTHER AND OTHER PARTICULARS. 54 SUBJECT TO THE EFFECT OF A DECLARATION OF HOMESTEAD RECORDED FEBRUARY 5, 1975, IN BOOK 8610, PAGE 680, OFFICIAL RECORDS. OATED3 JANUARY 31, 1975 OECLARANTg ARCHIE DOUGLAS WILSON AND BETTY JEAN WILSON r T2 /MJS i� r! IPAGE 4 voo;;;�r NbOF 2� 9 d Sections 17.08.010 k 17.08.020 CHAPTER 17.08 RE3M%k"7lAL DIISTRICM section 17.08.010 Purand General Men Consistency A. The General Plan outlines pols and objectives, with regard to residential uses and development. This Chapter is Intended to Implement these General Plan goals and objectives through the following purposes 1. FacWtate developmant In accord with the General Plan with greater flexibility and encourage more creative community design than under conventional caning or subdivision regulations. 2. Promote economical and efficient use of the land while providuy a harmonious variety of housing choices, mixed use development, urban services, and preservation of naturist and scenic qualities of open spaces and areas or structures of historical signlncance. 3. Promote design and construction techniques :hat are responsive to the environmental resources of the site, .and encourage energy conservation through solar and other renewable energy resources. 4. To promote development compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and protect neighborhoods from harmful encroachment by intrusive or disruptive development. i S. it is intended that land use shall be managed with respect to location, t ring, and density /intensity of development in order to be consistent with re capabilities of the City and special districts to provide services, to crate communities where a diverse populetion may realize common goals, and to achieve sustainable use of environmental resources both within and outside of the City. Section 17.09.020 Beddentiol Development B'strlcts These dl •ricts have been created to implement the goals, objectives and two use designations of the General Plan. In addition, each district is designed to Implement the density limits of each district. A. Very Low Residential District (0,11 This district is Intended as an area for very low density single family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of up to two units per gross acre. B. Low Residential District (L} This district is Intended as an area for single family residential use, with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per gross acre. C. Low- bledlum Residential District (L!1); This district is Intended as an area for low - medium density single family ce multiple family use with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby single family detached nel&toorhoods. Residential densities are expected to range from 4 to 8 units per gross acre maximur -66- Section 11.08.030 D. Medium Residential Dletrlct (" This district is Intended as an area for medium density multiple family use, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities are expected to range from 8 -14 units per gross acre - �dmum. E. Medium -High JYtrlet (NO This district is Intended as an area for medlum -high density multiple family use, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower den -Aty residential development Residential densities are expected to range from 14 to 24 units per gross acre maximum. F. High Raddsntial District (0 This district is Intended as an area for high density multiple family use, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities are expected to range from 24 to 30 units per 4ross acre. Section 11.08.030 Use RrauhtI=d Uses listed in Table 17.08.030 shall be allowable In one or more of the residential districts as Indicated In the columns beneath each residential district heading. Where Indicated with the letter "P ", the use shall be a permitted use. Where Indicated with the letter "C ", the use shall be a conditional use subject to a Conditional Use Permit. This section shall not be construed to supersede more restrictive use regulations contained In the Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions of any property or dwelling units. However, In no case stall uses be permitted beyond those allowable In this section. in the event these is difficulty In categorizing a given use In one of the Districts, the procedure outlined In Section 17.02.040 stall be followed. TABLE 17.08.030 USE REGULA71ONS FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTPICPB USE VL L LM M MH H A. Residential Uses 1. Single Family Detached P P P Ps - 2. Single Fames Attached - - P P P P (Du -,Trl- and Fourplex) 3. Multiple Family - - Ps P P P Dwellings 4. Mobile Home Parks C C C C C C Note, Symbol s Indicates permitted in eoNnmction with optional development standards only. P - Permitted Use C - Conditional Use Permit required -67- C Sectlo., 17.08.030 P - Permitted Use C • Conditional Use Permit required -68- USE VL L LM Y iH H E. Other Uses ' 1. Animal Care FacWty C - - - - - 2. Cemetery C C C C C C 0. Church C C C C C C 4. Club, Lodge, Fraternity & Sorority - C C C C C S. College or University C C C C C C S. Convalescent Center - - C C C C 7. Public Facility C C C C C C 8. Day Care Facility Accessory - 6 or lm P P P P P P Non - Accessory - 7 or more C C C C C C 9. Fire k Police StaUon C C C C C C 10. Hospital - - C C C C 11. Outdoor Recreation Faciity (non- commercial) C C C C C C 12. Public Park and Play - g" , P P P P P P 10. .uential Cam racility Accessory - 6 or less P P P P P i Non - Accessory - • 7 or more - - C C C C 14. Schools, Private a Parochial C C C C C C 15. Stable, Commercial C - - - - - 16. Stable, Private P - - - - - 17. Utility or Service Facility C C C C C C C. Aceessor Uses cceliory Structure P P P P P P 2. Antenna P P P P P P 0. Caretaker's Residence C C C C C C 4. Guest House P P P - - - S. Home Occupation P P P P P P 6. Lodging Unit P P P - - - 7. Other Accessory Uses P P P P P P B. Private Garege P P P P P P 9. Private Swimming Pool P P P P P P P - Permitted Use C • Conditional Use Permit required -68- Section 17.09.010 D. Temporary Us is 1. Temporary Uses as prescribed in Section 17.C1.070 and subject to those provisions P P P P P P 2. Temporary trallers for use In conjunction with religious and agricultural uses for a specified interim period. C C C C C C P n Permitted Use C m Conditional Use Permit required S. Special Use R"ulatioru 1. Agricultural Usest Prior to development, the following agricultural uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted on lots of 2.5 acres or morel (a) Permitted Uses: (1) Farms for orchards, trees, field orips, truck gardening, flowering gardening, and other similar enterprises carried on In the general field of agriculture. (2) Raising, grazing, breeding, boarding or training of large or smell animals except concentrated lot feeding and commercial poultry and rabbit raising enterprises, subject to the following: (a) Cats and dogs: limited to the keeping of not to exceed four (4) cats and/or four (4) dells, over four (4) months of age. -69- C USE YL L LM X YH H 10. Second Dwelling Unit (including elder cottage) C C C - - - lt. Recreational Vehicle Storage Yard - C C C C C 12. Peed B Tack Store (If accessory to commercial stable) C - - - - - 11. Dormitory (:f accessory to college or school) C C C C C C 14. Uses in Historic Structures C C C C C C D. Temporary Us is 1. Temporary Uses as prescribed in Section 17.C1.070 and subject to those provisions P P P P P P 2. Temporary trallers for use In conjunction with religious and agricultural uses for a specified interim period. C C C C C C P n Permitted Use C m Conditional Use Permit required S. Special Use R"ulatioru 1. Agricultural Usest Prior to development, the following agricultural uses are either permitted or conditionally permitted on lots of 2.5 acres or morel (a) Permitted Uses: (1) Farms for orchards, trees, field orips, truck gardening, flowering gardening, and other similar enterprises carried on In the general field of agriculture. (2) Raising, grazing, breeding, boarding or training of large or smell animals except concentrated lot feeding and commercial poultry and rabbit raising enterprises, subject to the following: (a) Cats and dogs: limited to the keeping of not to exceed four (4) cats and/or four (4) dells, over four (4) months of age. -69- C Section 17.08.030 (b) Small livestock: with the number of goats, sheep, and slmllar•aulmals limited to twnlve (13) per acre of total gross area, with no more than one (1) male goat. (c) Cattle and horses: Including a elves and colts over six (8) months of age, with a max mum number of four (4) animals per acre of total gross &--is. (d) Combinations of the above animals, , roWded the total density on any given parcel shell not e4�eed that herein specified (e) In no event shall there be any draft to the pesmlsslble number of sheep which may be grazed per acre, where such grazing operation is conducted on fields Ix the purpose of cleaning up unto¢ vested crops, rcubble, volunteer or wild growth, surd further, whet a such grazing operation is not mnducted for more than (4) weeks In any six (8) month period. (3) Aviary: limited to fifty (50) birds px acre. (4) Aplarys provided that all Alves Or boxes housing bees shall be placed at least four hundred (400) feet from any street, toad or highway, any public school, park, property boundary or from any dwelling or place of human habit :lion other than that occupied by "M owner or caretaker of the apiary. Additionally, a water source shall be provided on -site. (5) Retail sale of products raised on property excluding retail nursery and sale of animals for commercial purposes. (b) Conditional Use Permit required: (1) Wholesale distributor and processor of nursery - plant stock. Retail nursery where incidental and contiguous to propagation of nursery stock and/or wholesale distributor. Outdoor storage and display are prohibited except for nursery - plant stock. (3) Dog kennels, dog training schools, small animal shaltars and dog breeding establishments with outside runs. (3) The raising of chinchilla, nutria, hamsters, guinea pigs, cavy, and similar small animals. (4) Frog farms. (5) Worm farms. -70- Section 17.08.030 2. Animals. Keeping of animals accessory to residential use shall be limited as 1 OM ws, (a) Number of Animals= The number of animals kept on any site shall not exceed the maximum number and combination of animals allowable as set forth In Table 17.08.030 -E. For example, the following combination of animals would be permitted in the VL Districh 2 ' hones, 1 pony, 1 cow, 4 goats, etc. (b) location of Animalsn Ali animals, excluding household pets, shall be kept a minimum distance of 70 feet from any adjacent dwelling, ' school, hospital or church located on any adjoining site. The location of corrals, fenced enclosures, bane, stables or other enclosures used to confine horses shall conform to this requirement. 1 (c) Deed Restrictions+ New subdivision Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions shall not prohibit the keeping of equln^ animals, where district requirements for the keeping of said dntm= have been met. Individual lot owners shall have the option of keeping equine animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowner's assocladans for amendments to CC&R's. A copy of the *' CCBR's for single family subdivisions shell be reviewed and approved by Ube City prior to final map recordation. Except as provided herelnabove, this section shell not be construed to supersede animal ' regulations contained In the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions of any site or dwelling unit. However, In to case stall private deed restrictions permit animals or numbers of animals beyond those allowable In this section. Exotic or Wild Animals Keeping of exotic or wild animals shall be permitted subject to Issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. (e) Offspring, Young animals born to a permitted animal kept on the site _ may be kept until such animals ere weaned (cats and dogs - 4 months; 4' large animals - 8 months; horses - 12 months). -71- I C Section 17.08.030 TABLE 17.a.030-E ANIMAL RROULA73ONS, RESIDENTIAL DWMCI3 NOTESr a. Young animals born to a permitted animal kept on tha site may be kept until such animals are weaned. (cab and dogs - 4 months; Large animals - 0 months•, horses - 12 months) b. As established by Conditional Use Permit review. C. A minimum of 20,000 square feet of lot is required to maintain these animals. d. Afore than 5 birds or rodents per each 5,000 square feet of site c -ea may be permitted subject to aproval of a Conditional Use Permit. e. A Pony which is defined as any hone measuring 14 hands and 2 Inche• or less in h,,ight at the withers, may be kept in addition to the keeping of two horses or In Ileu of two horses, three ponies may be kept on a 20,000 square foot lot. -72- Minimum Site Maximum Number a Type of Animal Area Par Animal(s) Of Animals Allowable Resid:ntial Required On Any Site District 1. Each horse, mule, 10,000 8 VL, Lo donkey or ponye 2. Each large animal 20,000 3 VL, Lc other than a hone, pony, mule, or donkey 3. Each small 5,000 8 Ali animal 4. Each 5 girds, or S,OOOd 25d All rodents S. Each cat None 3 All 8. Each dog None 3 All 7. Household pets None No maximum VL other than a cat or dog 8. Exotic or Wild b b All Animals NOTESr a. Young animals born to a permitted animal kept on tha site may be kept until such animals are weaned. (cab and dogs - 4 months; Large animals - 0 months•, horses - 12 months) b. As established by Conditional Use Permit review. C. A minimum of 20,000 square feet of lot is required to maintain these animals. d. Afore than 5 birds or rodents per each 5,000 square feet of site c -ea may be permitted subject to aproval of a Conditional Use Permit. e. A Pony which is defined as any hone measuring 14 hands and 2 Inche• or less in h,,ight at the withers, may be kept in addition to the keeping of two horses or In Ileu of two horses, three ponies may be kept on a 20,000 square foot lot. -72- Section 17.08.030 3. Home Occupations. The use of a resiCance (or business purposes shall be permitted subject to Issuance of a Home Occupation Permit (See Section 17.04.060). 4. Mobile Homes. One (1) mobile home is permitted on a lot In a residential UG—Oct, except VL, subject to the following requlrementst (a) The mobile home is placed on a permanent foundation system In compliance with all applicable building regulations. (b) The mobile home construction is certified un4er the National Mobile Home Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 and which was constructed after October, 1976. Documentation Indicating certification and construction date must be submitted to the Building and Safety Division In order to secure valid building permit(s). (c) The Design Review Committee shall determine H the placement of the mobile home Is compatible to the Immediate area In which It Is being placed In accordance with Section 17.06.010 and the folioring criteria: (1) The design of the mobile home unit ahall be similar In character and appearance to other dwellings In the area for such things as unit size, roof overhangs, roof materials and exterior materials. (2) All building setbacks, parking, coverage, height, wid:.. and sign requirements of the base District shall apply. S. Recreational Vehicle Stor a Yard. Only the parking and storage of recreation vehicles proxlm ty to residenual users shall be permitted on lots of 2 acres or more unless part of a master planned development, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (a) All storage activities shall be screened from public view by a combination of block or masonry wall, berming, dense landscaping, or building man. (b) Retail or wholesale activity, Commercial dismantling, repair or storage wrecking activities or the storage of junk or salvage materials or dismantled pa:ts are prohibited. G. Second Dwellln Units. Permitted subject to approval of a Conditional Use ern t an the 0 Mowing criteria: (a) The unit may be constructed as an accessory building or attached to the primary residence on a parcel in a single family residential district. (b) The unit Is not for sale, but for rental purposes only, or use by a member of the Immediate family. (c) The lot contains an existing single family detached residence, and does not contain a guest house. -73- 7. Section 17.08.070 (d) The unit does not exceed 010 square feet. (e) The unit shall have a separate entrance from the main residence. (f) The unit shall provide parking and access per Chapter 17.12, except temporary removable units shall provide one off - street parking space. (g) The unit construction shall conform to the site development criteria applicable to accessory buildings or additions to main residence In the base district in which the unit is located. (h) The use of temporary /removable structures for a second dwelling unit shall be limited to the sole occupancy of one or two adult persons who are 60 years of age or over and related to the occupants of primary residence by blood, marriage, or adoption. Further, acid structure shall be rastrlcted to the area at tie rear of the primary residence and adequately screened from public view from the street. (1) The unit may require design review, pursuant to Section 17.06.010 -E, as determined by .ne City Planner. 0) The applicant shell submit to the Building and Safety Division written certification from the affected water and sewer district that adequate water and sewer facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed unit. For units using septic facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Quality Control Board and the City, written certification of acceptability including all supportive Information shell be submitted. Uses Within Reco izcd Historical Structures. Exlstigq historical landmarks oc po ns w nave Dean recogfuzgrby the City as having historical significance are encouraged to be enhanced through physical improvements. Historical structures within a residential district may be used for uses other than residential based upon the following criterlat (a) A conditional use permit shall be approved by the Planning Commission. (b) Any use proposed shell not muse Intensification or disruption to any adjacent uses or neighborhood (c) The uses shall be limited to small scale uses such as, but not limited to, boarding house, bed and breakfast (nn, minor offices, boutique, antique shop, book store, or florist. (d) The site and structure shall be fully improved to include such things as, but not limited to, landscaping, parking, new exterior building materials (roofing, siding, painting), wells or fences, street Improvements, drainage facilities, etc. _7q_ I r �t I� Section 17.09.010 Swum 17.06.010 site Development Criteria The Site Development Criteria are Intended to provide minimum standards for residential development. These site development standards should be used In conjunction with the design guidelines which are set forth In Section 17.09.090 a' this chapter. This section shall not be construed to supersede more restrictive site development standards contained in the Condltions, Covenants and Restriction or any property or dwelling unit. However, in no case stall private deed restrl_Uoos permit a lesser standard in the can of a minimum standard of this section or permit a greater standard In the case of a maximum standard of this section. A. Doveio ment Standards. The development standards for residential development are arrange n o two categories, (1) taste development standards, and (2) optional development standards. These standards am used in conjunction with the Absolute Policies and Design Guidelines during the residential land development/design review process as discussed In Chapter 17.06. Each residential development must conform to either the basic standards or the optional standards. 1. Basic Development Standards: These standards are intended to provide bade standards which will ensure good quality end compatible projects. A residential development over four units per acre Is generally limited to the .1 proper transition and compatibility to adjacent residential developments; existing or proposed. -75- C mid-point of the density range for which it is designated. These standards, �s well as the density limitation, eta Intended to create a development which will be compatible and provide for proper transitions from more sensitive or less intense residential development. 2. Optional Development Standards: These standards are Intended to provide high standards for the development of projects of superior quality and romn_ '.iodlty. The optional standards allow development at the higher end of the designated density range. Howavar, the standards and development expectations have been Increased stove and beyond the basic standards In order to ensure proper transitions and buffers from lower Intense reside, Ual uses. The ul'tmate density allowed In any residential district a ;all be determined through the residential land development design review process and public hearings as described in Chapter 17.09. The Planning Commission shall have the authority to reasonably condition any residential development to ensure .1 proper transition and compatibility to adjacent residential developments; existing or proposed. -75- C lection 17.08.040 B. Basic Development Standards. The folloxlllg table. Table 17.08.010 -B sets forth MIrUmum development standards for residential development projects tiled up to the mid -point of the permitted density range. TABLE 17.08.080.8 BASIC DEVELOF1[EN r STANDARDS tan•a +a.Ir.a �. s Lr r re a I.1 Atw .,5 Y4l.e. Not At•n/• I1.NI Low RAN • Y/a " WS Nil oVmI WI, OtIn. fink A ` \I.M. N � / Nil • .w • n c qw, 0 D mri11 TY11/ { •.rn{ b \0 u YI. e.e.1 W KtIN IN Ira , N. N .. Nla 11/R MW.m O•pt0 {N r LN f1 I lu All 1 tl�a U".m tp up 30 a: �. N 1 N Wl Nrl to trtnt O." , {m1 11s IOM Ns i U% Nl YIA 114 iH tmeml• N 70 . At >/ M/t NJl 10 tent W1.1 VIN N/a N.l a•rmM Ur Le tIJ\JY•a InetTWf•o 1sI ! tl.s• seq. N/l •4,l ,AWJ •mT\I nytl 1 vTtl wrrts C Sta•1'md {/ 1/ tl u Wl N)a MtYw Mb T" .Is $no s 11'1 N/l tl/l a•.. TW N a 1 1s to N/a am In•ausws SS• d 100 so s• + L• t••nw•.IOtm W t1AN At Mtsw 34,s N/s 1 I V $ 1141rd liana u0/f1 Lt.M YY" ID.•Wls OmV 9 AR•I.RT efa1.1 Initt ro Itmt 0~ All AIR All IVl I I1 10 A IS N I1 N I{ I1.1paY�AUw u b 11 b \0 u 1W ra.Yele n% Ira , N. se. 111% fa♦ Mn4Opmsp.te NN /NI■ lONAVI 1114,110 UU134 111,100 tW1N IGl 1b 1 apps sw) umu CO.+m opf010•e.• NIl Nis Nla M UT 11s I%.... V U. 011 spm•• 11s IOM Ns us U% Nl IIn•.t• A rem.ml a•fe.11m 4.•/I•ealn VIN N/a N.l a•rmM Ur Le tIJ\JY•a ♦ L.mlmq 400 mf.U\n is o.emtlmT.u.•U AVI Ut rU1♦ ♦ N..0 I"m11..4�11111 <1 +\)4m A. %.Y amt TM0\.De•e1 vV,, . t to 1.0mm IIALIWN 6 AN 10 IM N.O.eml u Vt. L At LM m.7.fl • b v.a it I.•t Ile. D.te a Mft.\? Tf.•.. Wb.\ue rm.1. Des pp•n.n. L bowl.. sT m s;,w M al v4, s L D t,v. . Isl..w I.M.ef1111(W Mtxw.tlNt b••.. R A NnLN t•e0) m.m.0 Qe.W' n( 4. Imn 000 game (Mt elY.pv lm ypn..l eI. Cmdll.ui 4,'m Imelf 0! W mm ITd aLl0. -76- C Section 17.08.040 C. Optional Development Standards. The following table, Table 17.08.040 -C sets orth mInImum development standards for residential development projects filed up to the maximum density permitted by the density range. TABLE 1T.08.040 -C OPTIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ' ova. Not a.s+.o L La ■ rA r =- aim Afw f Seel SAC '•R/A wR A/R 1 SMA tow... mtl 1 tsq+ g aunt. fworaM.wa. wR KZ t0.t. t' tM a..r.r V.10,� • W' glow F Y up U slow A .a. L Ar. s 14 14 W ttmw.D..nus 0.3 tam tap. t..W attaw I I 1 a heU4na 4tl e.e.aVy fa veaWfl.bnU.M MmW. ft Tow 17a64.0 I.I&11+.TAm. Rtfamt-11 MMIst fa TL W L.lMUM Wan.UaL a U.tt tttar.lUNNI St. s, LWhU4 L AAelwsi r.ar.mt USL Le Lr 6rakL a las tom is Sent fn. mn W Yb..r epWm..UUw N.S. ba ap.n,a L rMen[n tVUnLtuS .I1a.1MM.In.l bon. f A airN Y.A / >utMa s..tles 4. Vas IN pan Sent Ni rmdn Ra Wero.U.f. eatl.ba.l w pttmit an aMV IT.N.016 -77- rw... iftlle T.Ytln rgWM lal.fw ry.Ww R/R suit etKWN ftmt rWr.v e.OU i *tYtlte nmw. M.M.f..al..N�m.. 1VR MR " ants. tank AV..t AYtS miss 1 3y14 "in L SIVIS � a..t.su.W mom �tj It wa11 Ss a11 . IMmnlq J i Iw J+N r At ans,w, Sets : M salfll goal f sao /fl. rASewasvers.l 9 RMtW ., i beet Y Ilan a 3 g Ill 4 MR WR oyr IN to qa R/R MR Soot u.R,aws s 21 is- me Its. ' QPss St. 2-rd'sh m..n CO Saw =6110yA mass sm. MISS twin taw IY.t roc+ storyp mDnu .l m ao.nl f W0111 - aw ,i sw SM , 2111 saw a heU4na 4tl e.e.aVy fa veaWfl.bnU.M MmW. ft Tow 17a64.0 I.I&11+.TAm. Rtfamt-11 MMIst fa TL W L.lMUM Wan.UaL a U.tt tttar.lUNNI St. s, LWhU4 L AAelwsi r.ar.mt USL Le Lr 6rakL a las tom is Sent fn. mn W Yb..r epWm..UUw N.S. ba ap.n,a L rMen[n tVUnLtuS .I1a.1MM.In.l bon. f A airN Y.A / >utMa s..tles 4. Vas IN pan Sent Ni rmdn Ra Wero.U.f. eatl.ba.l w pttmit an aMV IT.N.016 -77- ' Section 17.08.040 D. Streetscave it is the Intent of this ca Section to create atraetspe ' stsndar(5 for bkpt, building and parking setbacks that help to Identify the function of strebtz a,,d to Improve the scenic quality of the community. The following table, Table 1? 08.040 sets forth the minimum setbacks based upon the street clew ficatlon In the Circulation Plan of the General Plan. These setbacks ' shall be required of all developments which contain or abut on any one of the following street classifications. ' TABLE 17 .08.040 -D STHEETJCAPE SETBACKS STANDARD FEATURE BUILDING PARKING LANDSCAPEAWALL 1. DetachedSBR a) Major /Special Blvd. 45 fh 18 ft. 20 ft. avg, 18 ft min. b) Secondary /Collector 35 ft. 15 ft. 18 ft. avg, 15 ft min. 2. Attached STR end MFR a) Major /Special Blvd. 45 lLC 30 ft. 45 ft. avg, 30 ft min.c b) Secondary / CoUector 35 ft.c 25 ft. 35 ft. evil, 25 ft mine Notes: a. Setbacks contained In Table 17.08.040 -D shell be measured from face of the ultimate curb location. b. On existing lots of record, parcels less than 175 feet In depth, need not provide a setback or landscaping greater than 20% of the depth of the property (excluding right-of-way area). C. Add 10 feet within M, MH and H Resldentiet Districts. E. Front Yard f endsca�In%. Where required, in Table 17.08.040 -C front yard en�seaping sf,"lTlnoiudo, at a minimum, one 15 -gallon size tree, one 5-gallon size tree, seeded ground cover, and a permanent Irrigation system to be Installed by the developer prior to occupancy. This requirement shall be In addition to required at, Let trees. -78- Se-von 17.08.050 LandscepmR. Trees perform many essential functions for the communityi beauty, snading, wind protection, screening, noise buffering and air filtering. Plant material should be selected to achieve these purposes, while tolerant to factors such as wind, heat and low water. ALL trees used must be consistent with adopted tree palette pursuant to the llenercl Plan. The following table. Table 17.08.040 -P, sets forth minimum standards for the number and size of trees, both on- and off -site, as required in Tables 17.08.040 -B and CI however, does not apply to single family detached or duplex dwellings. 01 M 14H it 1. f trees/gross acre 40 so 60 70 2. % box trees 10 20 30 30 3. % 15 gallon trees 80 70 60 70 4. % 5 - gallcxi trees 10 10 10 0 Recreation Aroa/Pacility. Where required, in Table 17.08.040 -C developer shall provide recreational amentun in conjunction with common open space, such as, but not limited to, swimming pooh and spas. court facilities (e.g. tenrus, basketball, volleyball), etc. In addiUm, enclosed tot let far0tues with play equipment, and large open lawn areas are required. All recreation areas or facilities required by this section shall be maintained by private homeowner's associations or private assessment dstri:ts. E�nerggyy Conservation. Where required, in Table 17.08.040C this Section sets forth C requirements o�ergy conservation features. 1. New residential development shall be provided with an alter native energy s/stem to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling [nits and for heating any swimming pool or spa. Solar energy shall be the primary energy system unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and effit racy 2. AD appliances and fixtures shall be energy conserving (e.g.. reduced consumption shower heads, water conserving toilets, etc). in 17.08.050 Absolute Politics Absolute Policies are intended to address the most critical Issues associated with lential development. These Include assuring neighborhood compatibility, pliance with adopted plans, adequacy of public facilities and services, and ection of the environment and public health. Each project must satisfy all absolute Aes before approval can be granted. These policies are used in evaluation of a lential project as described in Section 17.06.030 of this Title. Plus & Policies 1. The Project is comistent with the adopted General Plan, Land Use ?W, Development Code, and all applicable Specific Plans. 2. The Project is consistent with the adopted Master Plan of Trails. .78- Section 17.08.053 3. The Project is consistent with the adopted Parks and Recreation Plan. 4. The Project Is consistent with the adopted Circulation Plan. D. Neighborhood Compatibility 1. The Project is compatible with and sensitive to the Immediate environment of the site and neighborhood relative to architectural deslgnl scale, b'bt and building helghtlldentity and neighborhood character; building orientation and setbacks gradingt and visual integrity. 2. The conflicts that a:e presumed to exist between the propmed development and surrouxd(ng land uses as described Lx Table 17.08.050 -F pertaining to "Land Use Conflicts ", have been effectively mitigated in the project design. 3. The Project Is designed so that the additional traffic generated does not have significant adverse Impact on surrounding development. C. Public Facilities & Services 1. The Project Includes rchool facilities or adequate school facilities exdst which are or will be eipable of accommodating students generated by thL+ project. Written certification from all affected School Districts Is required within ninety (90) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or Issuance of permits In the case of ell other residential projects. 2. The Projec• includes sewer and water facilities or adequate facilities edst which are or -,ill be available to serve this project. Written certification from the affected sewer and water district required within ninety (90) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision rc Issuance of permits In the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certification of acceptability, Including all supportive Information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. 3. The Project includes street Improvements and will generate traffic volumes resulting in a service level equal to or above level D (defined as a 85 -95 percent volume to capacity ratio by the DIES traffic study). 4. The Project provides adequate access for emergency vehicles. 5. The Project provides storm dreirs, master planned dralnege facilities or special drainage facilities necessary to adequately dispose of surface water runoff or alleviate grading constrainu. 6. The Project provides for a Homeowner's Association and/or Maintenance District to ensure both on -site and off-site maintenance. 7. The Project conforms to the access control policies of the General Plan regarding arterials. 8. The Project provides local feeder trials and community trolls as required by the Cenetal Plan. -80- ' Section 17.08.050 D. Public Health k Safety ' 1. The Project lies within; or partially within, an adopted "Special Studies Z,)news a geologic report has been submitted which locates the presence or absence of actual fault traces in accordance with the provisions of the Alquist- Priolo Act, and special engineering precautions have been taken to overcome those limitations or these areas have been set asido from development. 2. The Project lies within areas subject to geologic hazards (i.e., slopes greater than 40a6, slope instability, soli erosion, ground tenure), as Identified in Figures V -1 and V -3 of the General Plant an adequate geologic or soils ' engineering investigation has been submitted, and special engineering precautions have been taken to overcome those limitations or these areas have been set aside from development. r clustered to promote infiltration and to me.intain open apace. -81- J. The Project lies within areas of Tujunga -Delhi son association which may ' have soll bearing capabilities that could limit development, as Identified In Figure V -2 of the General Plan, an adequate sons engineering Investigation has been submitted which Indicates the soils can adequately support the ' weight of the structure. 4. The Project is not on public sewers and lies within areas of Frlant Escondido ' and RamonsfArnngton sell associayoro which may not be suitable for on -site wastewater disposal, as Ventlfled In Figure V -2 of the General Plan, an adequate site specific Investigatka has been submitted that demonstrates the sons are suitable and the disposal of waste water will not degrade the subsurface water quality. ' 5. The Project is located within a flood hazard area, as Identified In Figure V -S of the General Plan, and special construction features have been Incorporated into the design of structures. S. The Project is located within a fire hazard area, as Identified In Figure V-6 of the General Plant a program for Interim fuel management has been Included to reduce the risk of fire, and fire mitigation measures (e.g., fire resistent building materials, site design which enhances fire access, etc.) ' have been Incorporated Into the project design per the requirements of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 7. All projects shall be within a seven (7) minute response time from a fire protection facility. H the project Is not within that response time, then provisions must be made with the Foothill Fire Protection District for ■ adequate fire protection. T. Resource Protection 1. The Project contains landforms of citywide si8nlficance O.e.. foothills defined as having slopes greater than 10 %, and Red HIM and the project has been designed to minimize alteration of the landform through proper site planning, clustering, and following natural contours. 2. The Project Is located within a major groundwater recharge area, as Identified In Figure 1V -2 of the General Plan, and development has been clustered to promote infiltration and to me.intain open apace. -81- Section 17.08.050 3. The Project contains streamslde woodland associations, identified as a significant natural resource in Figure IV -2 of the General Plan, and site Investigations have been completed, and mitigation measures proposed (Including clustering) to mitigate Impacts upon riparian community. 4. The Project Is located on a site or contains a structure or other feature which is designated as a historic landmark, and provision has been made for preservation of said landmark In aecorde...e with the Historic Preservation Ordinance. 5. The Project site is designated by the General Plan as Hillside Residential, and environmental studies have been conducted to determine land holding capacity and site development constraints, and the proposed density Is no greater than two units per net buildable acre. 6. The Project site is designated by the General Plan as Open Space, and development has been enneentrated to preserve open space, and the proposed density Is no greater than an average density of one unit per 60 acres. T. The Project promotes energy efficiency through the use of energy efficient building design (e.g., south facing windows, energy conserving building materials and appliances, etc.) and site planning (e.g., east -west aligned units, landscaping for solar access, etc.). P. Land Use Conflicts The matrix In Table 17.08.090 -F indicates tho conflicts that are presumed to exist between land tun. The types of mitigation measures listed In the following sections are the design tools that should be employed either separately or In combination to mitigate existirg or potential land use conflicts. The Absolute Policies require that such conflicts be effectively mitigated in the project design. 1. Land Use Conflict Mitigation Measures (a) open ^ace Setbacks. By providing an open space butter between con c ng LIM uses conflicts can often be avoided. The width of the buffer required will depend on the severity of conflict and the extent of landscaping. To work effectively, the ownership, use, and maintenance of the open space buffer must be clearly defined. (b) Lendses in and To hle Changes. As part of an open space u er or as a treatment ot iana immediately adjrcent to buildings, landscaping can be used to reduce conflicts. (c) Dense plantings of evergreens can provide a visual buffer. (1) Sensitive landscaping can soften the sharp visual contrast between two abutting land uses by subduing the differences In architecture and bulk and by providing a gradual transition rather than a harsh edge between uses. (2) Dense growth of plants can be visually appealing but also can be used to discourage unwanted and unsafe pedestrian or bicycle access between land uses. -82- ' Section 17.09.050 I� (3) Landscaping can be used in combination with other mitigation measures, such as reducing the width of open space buffer required and soften the visual conflict mated by safety and security fences. (4) Becontouring of the land an alter views, subdue sounds, reduna glare, change the sense of proximity, and channel pedestrian travel. (d) Orientation. The strict spatial proximity between land uses and the apparent or fanotlonal proximity can be very different depending on the orientation of buildings and activities in the two land uses. (1) The buildings themselves can cause a buffer to be created by effectively turning their beets on each other — orienting views, access and principal activities away from tie other I" use. Care must be taken, however, that a hazardous and unaesthetic "no-marts' lend is not created in the process. (2) Alternately, the Intervening space can be eliminated altogether If the two buildings share a common back well. i (2) An entire site plan can be oriented so that the activities end functions are aligned hicrerchdcally — placing those Icast compatible furthest from the common boundary between land ' uses and those most compatible near that boundary p.e., single story adjacent to single story). (e) Barden snit Allevlatlon. It may be appropriate and necessary to use ' ys c arr ers to prevent the undesirable attributes of one land use from affecting the people and activities In the adjacent land use. (1) Fences, wells and berms an prevent the passage of people Into areas that would be unsafe or insecure. (2) Light and noise cen also be mitigated through physical harriers such as fences, wells, berms, screens and landscaping. W Architectural Competlbility. In addition to the architectuual 7_ era ore nv0 v in mitigation through orentatlon, the architectural design of buildlrgs can reduce conflict and promote compatibility. (1) Materials, co'.ors, scale, and prominence of buildings In edjecent land uses can be coordinated so there is a gradual transition from one lend use to another rather then a sharp and dspleasing contrast. Purely aesthetic details that are "tacked" onto a building to cover up 1m,.1 use conflicts, however, will cause more harm than good. (2) The architectural compatibility shou:d rise from a total consideration of the function of each lani use and the function of the space between them. _82_ Section 17.08.050 (g) Circulation. Streets and parklrg areas ern often sorvo to reduce cert types of land use conflicts. Separation cf conflicting uses with a street or parking area can provide a buffer. TABLE 17.OY.C90 -F - LAND USE CONFUCIS -84- Land Use Conflicts rNN11Y11YI1Y \IYI.. \rl rr Tpe5 Of COniIIC'S nr r\ r rsr rllr\r r YlY (� S Yj{ Ilght \ ;hW 5"°tltl Land Uses 29 W � t$t�� C p' S ? , oearnetics P prl�v prr.\.e Pecrewan d O� oc.cas: sotenv PeWental tow DerGty Motlercte Dens'v . I I B o I gn Density •. I i R L n%t JtICnOI v I' Crnce /Busness iE I S u Con nercaoi 1 InO�srrcl 4 ?OdrOOtl � —� 27,"g BO'S n IC C_ 7 ^tl - _ C e - *c, Scree, A,ler.o Stree' ` mil - -84- Section 17.06.060 8eetim 17.08.060 geLew Devele went Criteria Ths special development criteria met forth In this section are intended to provide mt:dmum standards for accessory structures, fences, etc. A. Accessory Structures and Additions 1. Accessory structures which require a building permit (Including enclosed and unenclosed patios, barns, cabanas, guest hones, second dwelling units, garages, carports and storage buildings), and additions to the main dwelling, may be located in a required Interior side yard or rear yard, except as required in Tables 17.08.040 -8 and C, subje:t to the following limitations. (a) Height. A height limit of 16 feet shell apply within the required yard area. Tao -tory additions may encroach a maximum of 5 feet Into the required rear yaM If the City Planne? determine that the encroachment is necessary for a continuation and extension of the architectural design, style, and function of the structure. (b) Cover e. A maximum 80 percent building coverage shall apply w -any required yard area. (c) Rear and setback. Accessory structures or addition, except 2-story structures, may be located 5 feet from the rear property line, exclud,ng cave overhang. Double frontage lots (through lots) adjacent to major and secondary arterials may not be placed 5 feet from the C rear property, but rather must meet t o� m minimu rear yard setback of the base district. Fr Ne14,tT LIMIT b *�2(M Ntt) -85- ' Section 17.08.060 ' (d) interior aide rand setback. The minimum aide yard sethack of the se d atr ct or teat or the existing building !h•" apply, which ever Is less, except accessory structures or adaitions may be located a minimum setback of S feet from the side property Hx ocly within the rear yard area, excluding eave overhang. Unenclosed patios attached to the main bull Ing shall be located at least S feet from the side property line only within the rear yard area, excluding eave overhang. (e) F�ronUV and corner side ar�d. No accessory structure or adeltlon shat: occupy any portion of a required front yard or corner side yard. B. Patio enclosures. Where required In Tables 17.08.040 -B and C. private open apace e m fit n a minimum dimension of 12 feet fcr groand naor units, and 6 feet i for upper story WAS. C. Protections Into Yards 1. Eaves, roof projections, awnings, and similar architectural features may project Into required yards a maximum distance of 3 tact, provided such appendages are supported only at, or behind, the building setback line. 2. Fireplace chimneys, bay windows, balconies, fire escapes, exterior stain and D. Protections Above Helght Limits. Flues, chimneys, elevators, u other mechanical equip ,ant, t ev on antennas, spires or belltore.s, or similar architectural, utility, or mechanical features, may not exceed the height limits In Tables 17.08.040 -B and C more than 13 feet, except as provided for In Section 17.08.060 -1, Antennas. E. E uestr�ien Tralllss. All new residential development within the Equestrian/Rural area dv'gnated by the General Plan, shall require local feeder trn8 easements for equestrian purposes, to provide access to the rear of all lots. All non - residential development within the Equestrian/Rural ores, shell require local feeder trall easements for equestrian purposes, where It is determined by the PLuming Commission that such trail connections are necessary to link residential areas with the trail system. The unobstructed access and use of said easements shell be enforced by property owner through private deed restrictions. Community Trails and Regional Trails shell also be provided where required by the adopted Master Pion of Trails. Trails shall be designed Per City adopted Equestrian Trail Guldellne:,'. -1313- landings and similar architectural features may project Into required yards a maximum distance of 2 feet, provided such features shall be at least 3 feet from a property Una. �( 3. Decks, platforms, uncovered porches and lending places which do not exceed a height of 48 Inches above grade, may project Into any front or corner side yard a maximum distance cf 6 feet, and project Into any rear or Interior side yard up to the property line. D. Protections Above Helght Limits. Flues, chimneys, elevators, u other mechanical equip ,ant, t ev on antennas, spires or belltore.s, or similar architectural, utility, or mechanical features, may not exceed the height limits In Tables 17.08.040 -B and C more than 13 feet, except as provided for In Section 17.08.060 -1, Antennas. E. E uestr�ien Tralllss. All new residential development within the Equestrian/Rural area dv'gnated by the General Plan, shall require local feeder trn8 easements for equestrian purposes, to provide access to the rear of all lots. All non - residential development within the Equestrian/Rural ores, shell require local feeder trall easements for equestrian purposes, where It is determined by the PLuming Commission that such trail connections are necessary to link residential areas with the trail system. The unobstructed access and use of said easements shell be enforced by property owner through private deed restrictions. Community Trails and Regional Trails shell also be provided where required by the adopted Master Pion of Trails. Trails shall be designed Per City adopted Equestrian Trail Guldellne:,'. -1313- Section 17.08.060 F. Sidewalks. All new residential development shall require sidewalks as follows: 1. Within the Rur&V questrian Area, as identified In Figure M -7 of the General Plan, sidewalks sluff be requlred per city standards on one aide of the following streets; Banyan, HJ!Wde, Wilson, Haven, Hermosa, Archibald, t Amethyst, Beryl, Carnelian, Sapphire, Turquoise, Etiwanda, East, Highland, 24th, Summit Avenues, and any other streets that may be added that are of the same classification as the aforementioned. Per streets Interior to the ' previously mentioned streets, s(denalb will be required on one side of the street on routes to achcol as determined by the City Planner and City Engineer with the approval by the Planning Commission. -' 2. All other residential areas shall require sidewalks on both sides of the street i per City Standards, except for areas where a Planned Community, Etiwanda Specific Plan or other specific plans have established specific standards. !.' 0. Solar Access. This section sets forth provisions for solar access. The provisions o sec on shell apply equally to all residential districts. 1. All new residential development projects, except condominium converstons, &lull provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opporumitles (e.g., lot size and configuration pr—Itting orientation of a structure In an east -west alignment for southern exposure or lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure to take advantage of shade or prevailing breezes). C zl (a) Consideration shall be given M local climate, M contour, to lot configuration and to other design and improvement requirements. -87- d. The location of a solar collector is required to comply with the local building and setback regulations, and to be set back not less than five feet from the " property line. 6. Developers of all new residential sub" .aiw., shall dedicate easements for the purposo of &souring that each lot or dwellln; unit shall have the right to reeelva sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar enerp$ system. The easements may be contained In a dedaratlon of restrictions for the subdivision wtdch shall be recorded concurrently with recordation of the '4 final map or Issuance of permits, whichever shall first occur. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtut a or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Section I� 17.08.060 -G-2. H. Variable Front Yard Provisions. Front setbacks required by the base district In Tables 17.080.040-B en snha1 be averaged on the interior lots within a single family detached or duplex subdivision. t , oil -88- Section 17.08.060 (b) Consideration shall be given to provide the long axis of the majority ' of Individual lots shall be within 22.5 degrees east or west of true south for adequate exposure for solar energy systems. \lot. \• B � W T4 asw MAt OR��TM p MIiRLT M�'r a► M MnM 2. No person shall allow a tree or shrub to be placed or grown sn as to cast a shadow greater than 10 percent of the collector absorption erea upon that solar collector surface on the property of another at any one time between the hoes of 10 a.m. and 2 p.m., provided that this section &hall not apply to specific trees and shrubo which at the time of Installation of a solar '. collector or during the remainder of that annual solar cycle east a shadow upon that solar collector. d. The location of a solar collector is required to comply with the local building and setback regulations, and to be set back not less than five feet from the " property line. 6. Developers of all new residential sub" .aiw., shall dedicate easements for the purposo of &souring that each lot or dwellln; unit shall have the right to reeelva sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar enerp$ system. The easements may be contained In a dedaratlon of restrictions for the subdivision wtdch shall be recorded concurrently with recordation of the '4 final map or Issuance of permits, whichever shall first occur. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtut a or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Section I� 17.08.060 -G-2. H. Variable Front Yard Provisions. Front setbacks required by the base district In Tables 17.080.040-B en snha1 be averaged on the interior lots within a single family detached or duplex subdivision. t , oil -88- Section 17.08.060 1 1. Antennas. The Installation of one (1) antenna which exceeds the maximum height ' owe district shall be permitted subject to the following limitations: ' 1. Operation. Any operation of citizens band or other radio transmitting equipment, excluding public service, public safety, or emergency radio services, shall be subject to the Performance Standards of this Chapter (See Section 17.08.080). 2. Height. The antenna shall not exceed SO feet In height, fully extended when in use and no higher than 36 feet when not In use (unextended) as measured from ground level. 3. Setback. The antenna shall not occupy any portion of a yard required In aRT7.o8.o40 -E and C except as follows: (a) A guy wire and anchor point maybe no closer than 3 feet from aside or rear Una. (b) A guy wire and anchore point may extend to the side or rear line adjacent to a dedicated alley. J. Fences Walls and Hed es. Tin following provisions regarding fences shall apply to re en en str ets. 1. Fences, walls, hedges or similar view obstructing structures or plant growth that reduce visibility and the safe Ingress and egr" of vehicles or pedestrians, shall not exceed a height of 3 feet In any required front yard. 2. Fences or wells, not exceeding 6 feet In height, may be located In a required corner side yard, rear or side yard. 3. A combination of solid and open fences (e.g. wrcught Iron, chain link) not exceeding 6 feet in height may be located In a required front yard, corner side yard or visibility clearance area, provided such fences are constructed with at least 90 percent of the top 3 feet of their vertical surface open, and non -view obscuring. _89_ 4. Satellite dish antennas (a) Dishes no greater that 1 meter In diameter may be roof mounted. lb) Dishes greater thin 1 meter In diameter shall be ground mounted and screened from public view on all sides with a combination of walls, landscaping or twildings. J. Fences Walls and Hed es. Tin following provisions regarding fences shall apply to re en en str ets. 1. Fences, walls, hedges or similar view obstructing structures or plant growth that reduce visibility and the safe Ingress and egr" of vehicles or pedestrians, shall not exceed a height of 3 feet In any required front yard. 2. Fences or wells, not exceeding 6 feet In height, may be located In a required corner side yard, rear or side yard. 3. A combination of solid and open fences (e.g. wrcught Iron, chain link) not exceeding 6 feet in height may be located In a required front yard, corner side yard or visibility clearance area, provided such fences are constructed with at least 90 percent of the top 3 feet of their vertical surface open, and non -view obscuring. _89_ iSection 17.08.060 4. A visibility clearance area shall be required on corner lots in which nothing shall be erected, placed, planted or allowed to grow exceeding 9 feet In i I height. Such area shall consist of a triangular area bounded by the street right-of -way lines of such corner lots and a Una joining points along said street lines 20 feet from the point of intersection. iI I S. Outdoor recreation court fences not exceeding 12 feet In height shall be I located S feet from any roar or side property lines, except when adjacent to outdoor recreation courts on adjacent properties. IH. Swimming Pools and Recreational Courts 1. Swimming pools, tennis courts, basketball courts, or similar paved outdoor I� recreational courts shall not be located In any required front yard, and shall be located no closer than S feet from any rear, side or corner aide property line. I 2. Outdoor lighting poles and fixtures are permitted not to exceed 12 feet In height. Any such lighting shall be designed to project light downward and shall not create glare on adjacent properties. IL. Mobile Home rarkm This section sets forth requirements for mobile home park lovedeve op�xcept as provided herein above, all other development standards contained in Tables 17.08.040 -B and C shall apply. 1. There shall be no minimum side area for a mobile lama park. 2. There shall be no minimum area, width, or depth requirement for individual �I I lots or spaces. 9. There shall be no minimum yard requirement for Individual lots or spaces. 4. There shell be no minimum size for Individual mobile home units. j I S. The minimum strn.t yard setback on public streets shall be In conformance with Table 17.08.040 -0 Streetscape Setba:ks. S. Existing mobile home ?irks and pre - existing mobile home parks shall not be deemed nonconforming by reason of failure to meet the minimum requirements prescribed In this section, provided that the regulations of this section shall apply to the enlargement or expansion of a mobile home park. -80- �I k I Beetlon 17.08.070 General Provisions Section 17.08.070 A. �Sl�ru N sll residential dbtrlots, signs shall be subject to the provisions of Title 1 —� the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. B. PtoR2rty Maintenance. All buildings, structures, yards and other Improvements sh&U be m nr n i a manner which does not detract from the appea once of the Immediate 11ghborhood. The following conditions are -ohiblted. 1. Delepidated, deteriorating, or unrepalred structures, such as: fences, roots, doors, wells, and windows. 2. Scrap Iumber, junk, trash or debris. 2. Abandoned, discarded cc unused objects or equipment, such as automoolles, automobile puts, furniture, stoves, refrigerators, cans, containers, or similar Items. 4. Stagnant water or excavations, Including pools or apes. S. Any device, decoration, design, structure or vegetation which Is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or Its Inappropriate location. C. icl Vehe Perkin . The parking of vehicles In all residential districts shell be Subject to a provisions In Chapter 17.12 and the Municipal Code. D. Vehlc Bend Equipment Repair and Storage. The following provisions shall apply to any vc c e, motor vehT e, camper mper, camper trailer, trailer, unmounted camper, trailer coact, motorcycle, boat or similar conveyance N all residential districts, and to all sites In any other district used for residential occupaneyt 1. Servicing, repairing, assembling, disassembling, wrecking, modifying, restoring, or otherwise working on any of the above conveyances shall be prohibited unless conducted within a garage or accessory building, or In an area screened from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally located fence, wall, cc equivalent screening. 2. Storing, placing or parking any of the above conveyances, or any part thereof, which is disabled, unlicensed, unregistered, Inoperative, or from which an essential or legally required operating part is removed, shall be prohibited unless conducted with a garage or accessory building, or N an area screened from view from the street and adjoining lots by a legally located fence, wall, or equivalent screening. 0. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 above, emergency or mina repairs and short -term or temporary parking of any of the above conveyances when owned by a person residing on the lot, may be conducted for an aggregate period of up to 24 hours In any continuous period of 48 hours exclusive of the screening requirements. 4. For the purpose of this section, references to types of conveyances shall have the same meaning as defined In the Vehicle Code of the State of California, where such definidoro are available. -91- 1 Section 17.06.060 1 Section 17.06.010 Performance Standards i A. intent. The Intent of lhb section b to pro: et properties In all residential ducts and the health and safety of persor from environmatal nuisances and hazards and to provide a pleasing environme:.: In keeping with the nature of the residential character. The performance standards set maximum tolerebW y limits on adverse environmental effects crested by any use or development of lane. S. Administration and Measurement. The standards of this section shall be erforced by the City Planner. Upon discovery of any apparent violation of V.ese standards, the City Planner shall Investigate using such Irotruments as nay, he necessary. If 1 a violation is found to exist, the violation shall be abated v a nuisance as prescribed In the Municipal Code. 1 C. Exec. The following sources of nuisances are exempt from Lie provisions of thhLiss 3 t1on. 1. Emergency equipment, vehicles acid devices. 1 2. Temporary construction, maintenance, or demolition activities between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., except Sundays and National holidays. 1 D. Noise, No operation or activity shall cause any source of sound at any location or aw the creation of noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise 1 controlled by such person, which causes the Ambient Base noise levels to exceed the following standards, and as contained In Section 17.02.120. TABLE 17.08.080 -D RESIDENTIAL NOISE STANDARDS 1 LOCATION MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE OF MEASUREMENT 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 1 1. Exterior SSdBA 60dBA 2. Interior 60dBA 46dBA 1 Notes: 1 (a) It shall oe unlawful for any person at any location within the city to create any noise or to allow the creation of any [robe which causes the noise level when measured within any other fully enclosed 1 (windows and doors shut) residential dwelling unit to exceed the Interior Noise Standard In the manner described hareln. (b) U the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be 1 discontinued or stopped for a thne period whereby the ambient noise level can boj determined, the same ;rocedures specified in Section 17.02.120 shall be deemed proper to enforce the provisions of this Section. (e) Each of the robe Umits above shall be reduced 6dBA for noise i consisting of impulse or simple tone noise. -92- Section 17.08.080 3. Special Noise Provisions (a) Peddlerx - Use of l.uud Noise etc. to Advertise Goods etc. No paddler or mob le vendor or any person the6 ahaluf si2sho lit, cry out, or use any device or Instrume,t to make sounds for the purpone of advertising In such a manner as to create a noise disturbance. (b) Animal Noises. No person owning or having the charge, care, custody, or control of dog, or other animal or fowl shall allow or permit the same to habitually howl, bark, yelp or make other noises, In such a manner as to create a noise disturbance. (c) Radiae Television Sets Musical Instruments and Slmilrr Devices. No persons opsrate or perm t the opera on or p ng oor any co which reproduces, produces or amplifies sounds such as a radio, musical Instrument,;homgraph, or sound amplifier, in such a manner as to create a noise disturbance as listed In Table 17.08.080 -Dt (1) Across any real property boundary or within Noise Zone 19 between the tours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. on the following day (except for activities for which a Temporary Use Permit is needed as prescribed In Section 2.7. (2) At 50 feet (15 meters) from any such device, H operated on or over any public right -of -way. E. Vibration. No vibration shall be permitted which can be felt with a- without the C a'onstruments at or beyond the lot line. F. Heat or Cold. No operation or activity shall emit heat or cold which would cause W temperature Increase or decrease on any adjacent property in excess of 10 degrees Fahrenheit, whether the change is In the air, on the ground, or In any structure. O. Clare. No operation, activity, sign, or lighting fixture shall create Numirmtitsu which exceeds 5 footcandles on any adjacent property, whether the Illumination is direct or Indirec• light from the source. Clare levels shall be measured with a photoelectric photometer following standard spectral luminous efficiency curve adopted by the International Commission on Illumination. H. Odors. No operation or activity shall be permitted of Odorous gases or other odorous matter In such gt.artlttes as to be dangerous, Injurious, nodan or otherwise Objectionable which is detectable with or without the aid of Instrunenis at or beyond the lot line. I. Electrical or Electronic Disturbances. No operation or activity stall cause any source of electrical or a ectron c disturbance that adversely affects persons ur the operation of any equipment on any other lot and is in conformance w4'" he regulations of the Federal Communication Commission. -93- Section 17.08.090 J. Air QualltX. No operation or activity shall cause the emission of any sm„ke, fly ash, ddit, fumes, apom, gases or other forms of air pollution which can cause damage to health, animals, vegetation, or other forms of property, or watch can cause excessive selling on any other lot. No emission shall be permitted which exee�ds the requirements of the South Coast Air Quality Management D.strict or the requirements of any Air Quality Plan adopted by the City of Rsncho Cucamonga. K. Fire and E los�ion Hazards. An operation or activity involving the storage of mmaD a or explosive loslve materials shall be provided with adequate safety devices against the hazard of vlre and explosion and adequate fire - fighting and fire suppression equipment and devices in accordance with the requirements of the Foothill Fire District Uniform Building Code, and Uniform Fire Code. Burning of waste materials in open fire s prohibited at any point. L. Fissionable or Radioactive Materials. No operation o: activities shall be perm ted which result at any time in the release or emission of any flssiondble or radioactive materials Into the atmosphere, the ground, or sewerage systems. M. LI utd or Solid Waste. No op,sation or action shall discharge at any point Into any public street, public sewer, private sewas• disposal system, stream, body of water or Into the ground, of any materials of such nature or temperature as can contaminate any water supply, Interfere with bacterial processes In sewage treatment, or otherwise cause the emission of dangerous or offensive elements, except In accord with standards approved by the California Department of PubLe Hesl:1 or such other governmental agency as shall have jurisdiction. Section 17.08.090 General Design Gutdellnes A. Intent. The intent of the guidelines Is to assist the developer in understanding and complying with the City's standards for building and site design. The guidelines ere based upon community design goats as expressed In the General Plan, and encourage the orderly and harmonious a;.pearence of structures and property along with associated facilities, such as signs, landscaping, parking areas, and streets. The guidelines establish a high standard for design quality but are flexible enough to allom individual expression and imaginative solutions. B. AepticabUltv. The provislom of this section shall apply to all development within all rewdential districts, unless otherwise specified herein. Any addition, remodeling, relocdtion or construction requiring a building permit within any residential district subject to Development/Design Review pursuant to Chapter 17.08 shall adhere to these guidelines where applicable. C. Site Plan Design 1. Existing Site Conditions. Natural features should be used to an advantage as design elements; such as, mature vegetation, tandforms, drainage courses, rock outcroppings and views. Conversely, undesirable site features can be minimized through proper site planning and buildbig orientation. _94_ Section 17.08.090 2. Building0rientation. Placement of the buildings shall be done In a manner compat b e w th surrounding existing and planned uses and buildings. The setback from streets and adjacent properties should relate to the scale of the proposed building. Larger buildings require more setback area for a ' balance of scale and compatibility with adjacent uses. Buildings should be oriented along a north-south axis, as much as possible, to encourage energy cons:rvation. -95- 0. Access /Circulation. The access and circulation should be designed to ' provide a safe and efficient system for vehicles and pedestrians. Points of saccess shall comply with city access regulations and shall not conflict with other planned or existing access points. Two points of access shall be provided for all but the smallest residential developments. The circulation system should be designed to reduce conflicts between vehicular and pedestrian traffic, minimize Impacts on adjacent properties, combine access } where possible, and provide adequate maneuvering areas. Curvilinear streets 't are encouraged whenever possible. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic shall be separated, to the extent possible, through the use of a continuous system of public and private sidewalks. i 6. ParkJnZ Areas. Parking areas should be designed to minimize usual " up ono t e overall project design. Parking areas should be screened from streets through combinations of mounding, landscaping, low profile wells and grade reparations. The design of parking areas should also r minimize auto noise, glare, and Increases In ambient air temperature. This can be accomplished through sound walls, screening with feneds or hedges, {• trees, and separation of parting spaces and driveways from residences. ` r S. Landsce In /O en S ace. Landscaping and open spaces sMald be designed as d an ntegral part o project design and enhance the building design, enhance public views and spaces and provide buffers and transitions where needed. Landscaping should provide for solar access and shade to facilitate energy conservation. Q. ienci�rar/Screenin . Fences and walls are discouraged unless needed for a specific or safety purpose. Where they are needed, color, material and variation of the vertical and horizontal planes are needed to bleno with the site and building design. The use of any fencing or wells e.culd be .� consistent with the overall design theme. 7. LE�I h�tlln Adequate on -site lighting should be provided to ersw, u safe environment while at the same time not cause cress of Intense light or glare. Fixtudes and poles shall be designed and placed In a manner ccnslst art and compatible with the overall site and buUdirg design character. 8. UtWtip oral Ancill Equipment . On -site utilities and enuipment shall be ocatl�inninconspicuous areas, away from public view. Where they are located in public view, they shall be sc: eened with a combination of material that best suits the overall design theme. 9. O��rad �nil. Development should relate to the natural surroundings and mdmize grading by following the natural contours as much BS pOSS'ble. Graded slopes should be rounded and contoured to blend with the existing terrain. Split -level pads, built-up foundations, stepped footings, ate., can be used In areas of moderate to steep gradient. -95- ' Section 17.09.090 ' 10. Piro Safetv. Development should be designed In accordance with Fire D str et requlremens for two points of safe and ready access. Areas designated as high fire hazerd areas should minimize fuel buildup around ' residences through greenbelts o. cultivated fuel breaks, D. Building Deslgn 1. Desl�Themmee. A recognizable design ttieme shall be established which is mmpe:ible with surrounding planned or existing developments and should be based upon prominent design features In the Immediate area (e.g., trees, t landforms, historic landmarks). Subtle vanat;ons are encouraged which provide visual interest but do not create abrupt r langes causing discord In the overall character of the Immediate neighborhood. It is not Intended that one style of architecture should be dominant but that Individual structures shall create and enhance a high quality and harmonious community appearance. -96- 3. Architecture. The architecture should consider compatibility with surroun ng character, including harmonious building style, form, size, color, materiel and roof line. Individual dwelling units st*u!d be distinguishable from one another and have separate entrances. Shadow patterns created by ' architectural elements such as overhangs, projection or recession of stories, balconies, reveals, and awnings contribute to a building's character while aiding In climate control. Further, changes In the roof level or planes ' provide architectural interest. j 3. Scale. The mass and scale of the building should be proportionate to the ' te, open spaces, street locations and surrounding developments. Setbacks and overall heights should provide an element of openness and human scale. 4. Materials and Colors. Coors, textures and materials shall be coordinated to achieve total compatibiL:y of design. They should blend well with the environment and not cause abrupt changes. e S. Signing. Every [wilding shall be designed with a precise concept for adequate signing. Provisions for sign placementl sign scale In relationship with building and readability shell be considered in developing the signing concept. While providing the most effective signing, It shall also be highly compatible with the building and site design relative to color, material and placement. 9. Scs E ui ment reen) . Any equipment, whether on the roof, side of building, cr groan , screened. The method of screening shall be architecturally compatible In terms of material, color, shape, and size. The screening design shall blend with the building design. Where individual equipment is provided, a continuous screen is desirable. -96- q 200, 9 N6\ I 1 U .1 .1 J NVILL1.0t HrurnY CONiV.`�Na A55.Aii C.i CHINO CALIFV"IA OI[IO January 2, 1986 Mr Archie D Nilson 7074 Ramona Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Proposed Right -Of -Way Acquisition of street frontage along Archibald Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California Dear Mr. Wilson: The City of Rancho Cucamonga is proposing to acquire Right -Of -Way in conectlon with the project referrenced above. Our function is to appraise the pmparty rights that may be required The purpose of this letter i9 to request you. permlasion to enter upon your property to make this appraisal You or ycur representative may, of course, accompany us We are avallaole between 8:30 a m and 5:00 p.m , Dlonday through Friday, and may be reached at (714)628 -5517 In the event this project is approved and property rights are required from you, a real estate agent will cantact y. u at a later date Respectfully submitted, J WILLIAM MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING APPRAISERS U heel S 51u.phy � 'tSM: pf �laAe[t C�6�,r, L L W 1 •tl 1reeYY•aI}Va1110'.�r 1 aA6 r.avona 5,6N• Y 1 .t 0«ter) _ u.0 SMr e•d mn damna..........._a OSm. w.9m,a.uWrlNrdYa . v}.._4 O IlastRKM attEYEAY 9.o. 65 Mav rd Vrd,tlwrd............_e O karnucnsJDEUVtaY s![. a •Les. mn, •ed rb.. dtd. -r+a a_ (CONSULT 10nnAMR FOR FUS) Mr. Archie n. Wilson 7074 Ramona Street Rancho Cucamongd, C 9173 •ArKI[ [tIIRIL.I, uanai[ea f4 anseln [eti w..•[ 1.6 5461. d rer�5,. I N1N•d an emd, YNebd t.N•. e (,.lA•r tiYJ.U.I a iaLwu c..(... r•5+s..n a ,reiLa 6oxw[[,uuuu uiiii u Qf ".iM 9 2� 7/ 1 e L PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED L D KING INC. Engineers /Planners Doug Mays Ontario, CA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Planning Department Alan Warren Rancho Cucamonga, CA MARSHALL & SWIFT VALUATION SERVICE Los Angeles, CA SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ASSESSORS OFFICE San Betmardlno, CA STAN—ON NURSERY INC Chino, CA WEST END INVESTMENTS Douglas Gorgon, Attorney Altn Loma, CA LIGHTNER DEVELOFMENI Birhars McLaughlin Upland, CA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Englr^_ering Department Lucinda Hackett Rancho Cucamonga, CA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Rancho Cucamonga, CA MERRILL LYNCH REALTY Virginia Ringier Ron Magruder Rancho Cucamonga, CA ARCHIE WILSON Subject Owner Rancho Cucamonga, CA CROWELL INDUSTRIES Builders /Developors David Cooper Upland, CA PLAZi BUILDERS INC Costa Mesa, CA D r. MOHAN CONSTRUCTION CO. Ralph Taylor (Irrigation pipe coats) Cntario. CA 9� ¢2 C) 3. WILLIAM MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING APPRAISERS 5663 Riverside Drive ' Chino, CA 91710 (714) 629 -5517 ' QUALIFICATIONS J. WILLIAM MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES is a firm engaged In the practice of real property appraising, as w =11 as appraisal of certain associated personal properties, e busmxss valuations, dairy herds and livestock. Emphasis Is placed upon the appraising of both rural and urban properties including commercial, Industrial and special purpose properties In the urban area. J. William Murphy, A.R.A., C.R.A., Is an experienced specialist In valuation and is an expert witness appearing before Superior Courts and other jurisdictional boards hearing valuatlen testimony. He has had experience since 1958 In appraising and counseling and Is a member of the American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, National Association of Revlew Appraisers, as well as the International Right of Way Assoclaticn. A summary of qualifications Is as follows: tPersonal Resident of Southern California since 19701 resident and In business In Chino ' area since 1958. Education Attended California State Polytechnic College, San Luis Obispo, California -with specialized studies to Animal Husbandry. ' Attended University of California (Los Angeles and Riverside campuses) for specialized courses In Real Estate with appraisal emphasis. Attended University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California - with specialized studies in Science and Economics. ' Have completed courses sponsored byt c 1. American Society of Farm Managers and Rurrf Appraisers ' a) Eminent Dornain - Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas ' bi Rival Appraisal - Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona fc) Advanced Appraisal School -San Francisco, California 2. American Institute of Real Es:ate Appraisers a) Real Estate Appraisal IA - University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California b) Cattle Ranches and Grazing 1 ands V - University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada r� QUALIFICATIONS Education - Cont'd. - c) Condemnation Appraisal IV - Southwestern University, Los Angeles, California d) Litigation Appraisal - University of Portland, Portland, Oregon 7. Business Valuation Institute a) Business and Intangible Valuation - Los Angeles, California 4. International Right of Way Association a) Course 101 - All segments (Law - Engineering - Appraising) - Grand 3unctlon, Colorado Me- Serships and Affiliations 6lembert American Society of Farm Managers aid Rural Appraisers) Accredited Rural Appraiser - 1977 International Right of Way Association National Assocatton Review Appraisers; C.R.A., Senior Member National Association of Realtors Califomia Association of Realtors Ontario - Upland -Chino Board of Realtors Awarded the Professional Designation of Certifteo Commercial Investment Member (C.C.I.M.) by the Realtors National Marketing Institute of the National Association of Realtors. Community Services Chairman of Planning Commission, City of Chino, California - 1968 to 1971 Governor's Appointee, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region - 1974 to 1978 Professional Experience Have engaged in farm, ranch, dairy, land and cattle appraisals brokerage through the states of California, Oregon, Arkansas da, Texas, New Mexico and Arizona since 1958. 2 QUALIFICATIONS ® Professional Experience - Cont'd. W From 1962 to present, President of J. WILLIAM MURPHY COMPANY dba BILL MURPHY COMPANY, Realtors, specializing In agricultural properties and operations. Founder and owner of J. WILLIAM MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES, CONSULTING APPRAISERS. Condemnation appraisals have Included valuations for utility easements, :load control easements and water line easements as well as fee takings for various puroses. Have appraised for: farmers, ranchers, dairymen, Investors, building contractors, cities, counties, water agencies, water conservation districts and the United States Government. Qualified a. expert on real estate values In the Superior Courts of California and Texas. 3 J. WILLIAM MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES CONSULTING APPRAISERS 5663 R!vcrside Drive Chino, CA 91710 (714) 62.4-5517 SQUALIFICATIONS Michael S. Murphy Is an appraiser associated with J. William Mncphy and Assoclatts, Consulting Appraisers, a firm engaged in the practice of real pruperty appraising as well as appraisal of certain associated personal properties and dairy herds. Emphasis ' Is placed upon the appraising of both rural and urban properties Including commercial, industrial and special purpose properties In the urban area. A summary of i qualifications B as follows: Personal Resident of Southern California since 1954; resid nt in Chino area since 1938. iEducation Completed twelve years of school In Chino, California, graduating with honors from Chino High School in January, 1972. Completed five years of training for the ministry In Brooklyn, New York from 1972 - Have completed courses sponsored by: 1. American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers Rural Valuation - Davis, California 2. American 50ciety of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers Rural Appraisal - Fresno, Califomio. 3. Marshall and Swift Commercial and Residential Valuation - Newport Beach, California. 4. Lumbleau Real Estate Schools - West Covina, California Memberships and Affiliations Candidate: American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers Member: National Notary Association - 1981 to present. California Turf Council - 1978 to 1980. QUALIFICATIONS Professional Experience ' Have engaged In fa,m, ranch, dairy, land, cattle, commercial and industrial appraisals through the states of California, New Mexico, Texas and Arkansas since 1980. Licensed real estate agent (State of California) with Bill Murphy Co., Chino, California -License No. 00818923. Fee appraiser associated with J. William Murphy and Associates, Consulting Appraisers, ' since 1980. Commissioned in .•-se, 1981 as a notary pubiic for the State of California. ' Community Service Co- Chairman for City of Hope, Chino Chapter - 1981 to Present ' Completed Appraisals for (among others) Attorneys: Maroney, Demchuk, Brandt and Krueger Upland, California ' Anderson, Taves and Reever Upland, California Rutan and Tucker Newport Beach, California Individuals: Jean Steppe - Chino, California Carl Muirbrook, Corona, California Geor&e to Veld* - Moeesto, California a M1 Income Properties: ! Rockview Dairies - Downey, California Precie Farms - New Mexico /Texas Arkavallcy Dairy - Arkansas i' Tahitian Village Apartments - Pomona, California Governmrnt Agencies: i C City of Gre -1 Terrace, Califorma Y City of Lake Elsinor, California