No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/10/01 - Agenda Packetyt{ Lions Park Community Center 9161 Ease Line Rcad Rancho Cucameu.ga, California October 1. 1986 7,30 D.y All items submitted for the City Cocecil Agenda seat be in m lt',ag. The deadliso for submitting these item is SzOO p.m. on the Wednesday prl•or to the meticg. The City Clark's Office receives all snob item. A.rat.t M Dana 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Plat. 2. Roll Callz Miksls _, Buquat __, Ring Dabl _, acd Wright ■. 10D0C0Ln ream yl0de 1. Tbureday, October 2, 1986 - 7z00 p.m. - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION - ! zna Park Community Canter, 9161 base Line Road. 2. Wednesday, October S. 1986 - 700 p.m. - PLANNING COMMISSION - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Ease Line Road. 3. Thursday, October 16, 1986 - 700 p.m. - PARK DEVELOPMPNT COMMISSION - Lions Park Cce nity Center. 9161 Base Line road. City Council Agonda -2- October 1, 1986 0. r� m Mu The following Couaat Calendar [tame are espeeted to be routine aN sae- costroruraial. rhey .ill ba acted apes by the Council at can time vitbewt discuesiou. 1. Approval of karracts, Register go'a. 9/17/86 and Pa 9/24/86 and Prell ending 9/4/86 Of 8778,512.39. for the total amount 2. Approval to receive and file entrant Investment Schedule as of September 25. 1986. 8 3. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 9829 located at the n 20 corner of Spruce and gym Avenues, Homes of California. submitted b�rtLNwvel� N RESOLUTION N0. 86 -273 27 A RESOLUTION Of TIE CIrr COUMCIL OF THE C17r OF RMCUO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9829, TENTATIVE MAP No. 98290, IMPROVENhNT AGREEMENT. AND IMFRCVENENT SECURITY 4. Approval of Improvereat .Ascension Agreement for Parcel MsP orth 8617 located on the east aide of Milliken Avenue, 28 n of Highlao! Avenues, submitted by Marlborougb Development Corporation. RESOLUTION N0. 86 -274 32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or ITY rNpROp OF RANCHO cle"OUGA. CALI THE CVOIIIIA, TIMPROVEMENT EZTERSION AGREEMENT IMPROVEMENT SECURIIT FOR PARCIL MAP 8617 AND 3. Approval of Nap, Iaproveraut Agreement and I Security for Parcel Map 9896 mgrovamant (8T86 -09) located between 33 Milliken and PicteDurgh Avenues and Fourth and Sirtb Street&, submitted by Elrby Duveloprsut, Limited go. 1. RESOLUTION S0. 85 -273 40 A RESOLUTION Of IRS CITY COUNCIL OF rag CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING FARCE. MAP NUMB RR 98 %. (TENTATIVS PARCEL MAP S0. 98 %), IMPROVEMCRr AGREEMENT. AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY City Ceuonil Agenda -3- October 1. 1906 6. C0 u Security for NPdreel P Nip ae906 AEreement nod Is rw Approw4l of 8ecurl of Hill aide Road 4 located et the nort0eaot 41 the Cburcb of J ad and f veo Avenue, aubmf Ctad y esus Cbrlet o Day Oaiou. RESULUTIDN N0, 86 -276 A IESMDTIf* Cr THB CIIy COUNC 52 n"X PARCEL CHAP pC O:CA. CALIPOHNIA.O APPRODAC IMPROPOfG {i' "Flo"NINTS ACRD a=CQ' N{P SECURITY . AND rq 7. Approval to Release Bonds Completion, and file notice of 53 Tract 12590_2 tbru 6 - Ines tad t Road Ise, of Raven Avaeu north Aldo of Baae Line • - Laeie Hops Accepts Naiotananea Cuaran tae Bond (Street) 897,000 8aleaset Faithful Performance Bond (Street) 89,0.00, AE SOLUTION NO. 66 -277 t A RESOLpTIOM OF TIN 55 OF RANCRO COCANORCA 0I1'Y COURCIL OF TIE CITY v Tog PUBLIC T • CALIFOUXA. ACCRDTAC TBRO 6 AND AO NPROFOlATB FOR TRACT 12390 -A OF CONPLETIOE�,tISg6 NaTE�t YILINC or ` A NOTICE 0. 1DProval to Beleaae Nafntenance Guarantee Bond, 3anyan9.P1 56 Plead Bu ild a on Jenaat and Ba to. Ppblre Noeth of E Releaset Naintecance Guarantee Bond (Street) 8 9a Approval 9,29, +� to Releue Naiateonoee Guarantee Boedt Tract 11013 - located no Ametb s goats. 57 7 C and Banyan _ Levle �• Release, `• Nafotensoca Guaranteo Bond K (Street) 8 7.340 . City C0uae11 AHa.da MMMM -4- 10. ADDroaal October 1, 1988 C ..io Hel eaae 800da and N4 09 file No tfee of DPna■lta. Located on Utica •.d 4th Street - C Role see, Pat thtul Pertot■aoce Bond (street) S 66.000 ArSoLDTIq it 86 -T7B A HLgOB4OTIq.or TRH CITY coo HCZL OF HANCNp COCAk1yCA, TB6 Pf18LIC INDHOV*, CALIPOHHLA OF THN C17T AOTsOHItI1C TOi P /OH • ACCHPTDIC C071 Ct DH 84-49 AND tLBTIq Von THY HOC A IIOTICH OP I1. i `t Hfslose 4p If eoa ue°:od Aodrav t0 racelrt a 00 fitly Oda oo vif[IC Cate Ai plan AN d■eat bo�!'eua vie sDaof 1 =• ADProvdl e0 ■aaE Ho. 06-01. ed-OIA and ll Acqufoitioa 0f Q Cents both eha Ikuateelt" betveeo park Bit.. aad 49ree■eat far es for the Deuk ■*if City dad jea. aDanatty boa,. the Idsofd Peru, O �taa Pa• Peroa rhood Dark 401 dad hoot, re ,ti., .1laa, loco tod on 13. eocrot, °t fod t Red• but a0f Turaet Aveau.Ehe south u ■cote. Idual• to efga • ■all alalo court HtSOLOriq NO' 81 -154C A H4gOoo Op I Cr T OOHC OP RANCHO CO T C C� OHTHLANORC�i1548�iHD AK$0 CIHD Q or 16. Bet DOCON@ITgH OH1D T08ICH TROLL NOgC98NG17 dD !I°,H - yHO Htob er 15tI pVIBtA , 1986 °area r N�PAH; DA9L OP tVIE Joe& on °p th the H g N ® r JET o etra a Hchdo a O PDl ea a 0 site aaer, north of urch L 58 City CounciI Aland, `3- 13• set Public Dc toper 1. 1985 UZ A88L98N1L a a rau P28r/,er 13, 1985 86 -0t amend the 0101DNI 1445N factor land a�11{ BCOOpL p BrRI rY PLAN AMQI Ur to Loo Hadi eta fro.. at to ands va loo std of Ro ben e r 20 act,. ofid �q1p, 8 Provtaicos of the oe "Am aPlaa to north of Church located Ity dsaa( q 1, E gZp�C[ $150.000f `erk of 19d4's- s CO 88 21 or arch 1986 meeting) Draat, (Cocttcusd 2ro�atttoofto°r[h BeDterbar 17, $6SOLUrr YI R0, A 8'�0LOr1 "272 R�Ra rat Clrr OpONCIL OF rOR CII7 CO)" ITt I15C IOND3 NOtCA 81 PR QM NOR D= OdOPNglr PRA rR C1LZPOq� UBRp PpR ORS _ow BIrR A0QUI8�r PROCRAN F U DJWRLOPNpico ro as to du /aamend the D located 0 c) to aLN" evaloprect p Mao September the nAPR mouth i ° °f Pf000e s fierea " (2-4 82 !I, 1985 aoe[ ngj 03: east of Arch load •4, (Coat!co Iha,d OaDIMANCZ AR RDUANCR N0, 299 (flbr raad[cg) cold frog ABSRy -' OR -O R 4COA N CKCA C1 001.'NCZL OI 91 Clrr 03e . AN 1NmALD80P0l CSOa O. 0 02 0,33 ' • 22002 (2 _q DO /Ac) r0 Ater "L (4 OR 4. -�� ASepde October J. � 1966 dp iCdOrr� OP rd41 t0. 85-279 A�$ G is C bPC?�q t CdG p0 008Cry D8paopivj /r g�e�APCerrD ��lir� or tar, r1T iyr� 9 r MO Qro "OoKr 24" t PA -W0 rr Oa, R Brr01/ Of tD. 86-280 WW04 IA 0 ot, rdd Cr 2.r COOX 1 C r144 -t C'ZoQ rI° UaC Crrr gc g p 12 1?dM 1"t!@ d td 0Rr �C Od a dAao "<Y41 rr ptAtceo rr� 07 MD. 86.29! Pt Cp rdd 81te CC*& Ct eNCA. CA6 y COOtC Ado ACod Lrc04FC pry 0AN� rL 0p ry. �a 17?Acr c AAZN AM"EXAp °kOd/C1e •r Tg 19.1 lS�Sd d11lAy �Cd DI� tL. 16 r'dt 12 PO 1 IW .8 1212802_1 $8A8-8 7R'or HO r0 861j57, 12940 2, 1219 12590 40 . ttPOPr'01 12941,3!21302- 200 ' 126�d3P 0 942 4bD P,�ry�C� .935 l+uD�r bu1jaont 8 ^eaz .q QZZ A pProjl4 71 1or� !n rA f, M' 208 -87j 3S 50 1, 1°, n,o e e .to urO of the - weeretp"ve+1 e 1+7 dwel opejat !nP of le of D+r} d Of en .1 >lo C °ter °rive ee 108 102 107 96 101 92 95 cit; ' a8oada park fp4 l a b f !el• °• of APPre.. 1, �aadee 01 t M at of eb OgYard fro" rrbtbt 2l eI tb D 19 dat bite oRb1R,rCR Rti 4oAree�elll relotire to All ORp R0, 3pp and on gttb] oe a t o�a Oy RO lRARCA� 0 (eecoad ••aa• l0. 080 I rR r•edla 70 01 ORS C C R) AND I�� ®CC Ml}yl 1 '20-020 Pq� CDd��rRRPRIQ►R •od °pld1ratlo Pree Poll, ° of °rra tloa COralae onk °t'aa Of to Rlp SI OI �IIL 04000rlCil 0, fLICI R rocu OI 10R (V0 C rAR R 4 CRI 0, R6V•iyrc POp . Rt Zp RcoZ ARD9 741, t, Jiro by - � u b •t•4¢$ . R /•tUri, 140 OP rR -u-z sftI7 145 It Raa,`4� Poll ey dlr�"q tb4t be t0 the r,"eared be by 147 136 October l' 19AS 123 o., City Council Agooda October 1. 1 2. BII4IN CR pgt1p03E� ACaRrtL wr ens •Oiai OPR CFA A pApr 2149 VIFg Tat TM CA FOR IPR 0IP740 T1ti -= $ggCEO Cp�rn.r,A• Y ,MINIM Uglyssam P 2. 1tiT0o�nr? t Adjourn to a vorkahop o0 Tuesday. October 7. 1986 at 6300 Pon, to the Beighborbood Cancer. 9791 Arrw Oighvs7. Ranebo Cueswaga, cc discuss Fublic Safety and Civic Facility. e 1 1 f� W ♦ Y ,•l I I I, OI`I`d POaO�,P �YO��a3Vr '•/'I O.0 *.O 4pp�W0 NNL4,'1 •P >I• •.O , J , � I I M�VN PVi Pd OMPPMpP•O•IO iC H PJO�Py i.p YOiTl p✓ HI ; . N E°T 1 �r Yea ar rr bo On, fpm ��n} T �An y aT YS P 1 Te y� 27 o"S €imnT RCS' °}€ iC�Si$N m 2sa NR�mi « � =P�T w FIE UN N Ip T e nK y' ag n Il is I I � ! I x a NTH P, +I[TTI aPl p.ro 2T r CT VAT, y`PC4 f, r1p ��men Tl�i'� 'T � 1 ipOSPMOTY,nn I j+ OO! >�m�P. ♦T €r >y, YY>bf,> sw a) n �m '.,yy»,,a�t 3pcoia.Ni�« ozi Erg r'=< n'�Fmnn a'° w» N �nn t•rr akl i L:I -.Ef Sill r�M TN�n A �aN M T I 'n` !, CC �N n u: ^I I x �z P �a sz Isnl I iog � E i � I i i r F n r hprr r4 rr Ir r s I aN It a nn oo ao 08 ..8 SeBSn 8L 0Q • n8 tiMO no $ acpr'undP mm mFoK.,r Or J • p mr /1'JYbrNpyJY �Ir mT NO6VPP N I E AOmO °fl ,°+onO VYrT•! +O�OOP,yi�oPa i1 °oJ °o8,1'oo rinp eol I I 1• I 1 I 1 I I � I I I I I r I I w R, 1 I I 1 I 1 I � I I � I I 'a• i r�� 4E�_al.S ?�fTa, _, :e,. �;>„ .�l L!t, r�r,,,j I:i•I ?e � .:it —i I ,c .'.'d iii ;�. f 1 " 1 rr I � Y I I � I a anl.ar O1iYii1 h-g i ln.r^i V ariir%r -. i. va a � w�HrtsS nL. i�'c p Awp L C MI• M I I O y4C�= Emsy= XMZ 1 Y�TSLNF T= }T�i�} o l {tlrr �.°.ua eli.!'r.mi. �i+.h•i.n '.ail yai� 1!� '4 iu awf}�'wri�.roD Mtmw or*yN 1 i TSAr���oal S��w�r Z,j.Ail N} 1 N I p NI ArCO }� .L4 �9gL •1 sl i � x �� � BF• } bl ` N r I I I ly I arr r�in r Ta4AA ^b�+ Ih z w �a .Tic4 a° j pr^ ��.aiZ wr Nr H l 1p qL v o v Te wlTi.�c« � Ntv }T�F.. T$�i �~ •r � .rw•.fe �f� �3= 3 >nr" li 1wy'RCm «e.T.. *r I ,Nf�1 NC " 1•IT L TF. 1'rT �'1NY .g vl I' Ir L AA Tr D pM IAA D I 1 r"w w r I TVII ww I TS � t11 II i r+ 15 D ♦ PV'.4 NMOa�.rO YuM UI. V +Vj�"! �uCf/rN OQDr NN Vf �iNr aDtIV M�. .. hr. Iw/N (�O� 1 O � ;t u �Fi "N rO�pN� oapyn S°} pPa,a N D}rr��p AP °Op' NO .N.N"r 1pPry`�ON1oo1 pau0 UN g ODOMNryy I� owiiopr pn.+i e RPN g0 oppUO(((((pmm���00MOVKr° 00f� O1NVNV ii r.0 oo OY wn aou I � r I ' I I I I I I I I I I - I .IILi rJ JISJy Ill ?� �1 ��1 �•I �I.t.l_1•.c TrT. -. ._i!SL.� -:J J I �f Sa 7ry 1 y �•tO J.M PTrW 1 > M^ Mt c mYfVV ear . a! PmP NJ�PyrfPtl tl I • T y,L, )> y NNN Yip UJ. I I �N AYInAS A[f•rI MT.•.•C m «fir �r Y PNyPy •q O "' '. n mef! �IPP� a `rf� ITIl ° °MT bPT(i� .(Y,N NY.v`I.'T-• Ier�12TF.,yN �2[•. T1pQ���LryLb>S� ' JA ^ ` i Z A b � 'T ml Or R4. n I. yi•Y I �1' ^ ; „O M� �N^�•�'•• •�1 ��I CyT1 pj� �' I111�1�O�T��, [TSp Cidi� 1 �1 «2 �� ,C•IwA >+•• YN T° .f. Tr I•n 1 T Mugs b r�• i ° �• m >�a mQ >11'NLNM y .vfi sa �y Tin aY�Ty AM b 9a`i :^ a.s, b^ e>n 1 ° '•• °A �A PN Tbr•��T Tw�i•TZ�TYI y�A �� • �M ;1 .°o i-Si l" v m� ;M M�}rs l,^•e `� M Napa Nf °>Sr Y�LVpK iY n p b T�•^ i•Yr1 mhT >S C.Si Yb 1'NI "` >Ty^ •� �I.',wN•°. Ip °I; j rM Pp N A { yy qtr+ n i r `- - vl� YI = SI ,ti fI "'N rl 11 1` r Yu Py .°.Pri`° - -- NI'rN I N 1 •C �� r, � W °NOYP -•�I •- [`+" z.°i�11 ~if cF+ I i A , Nr tj �,g pNU£yp �uJ`�� n0 e« • n N^ .'n1./4.' ti 1 i Vl vP MiU�•VM lit t' VUP .y •u I'u.rPU I J V I W11 __ °b * � iIr" tiP A,°, v: +•WF•n y .ji1 I U °NNra / �WhO� 4v NAR Vary I r r i �JNry�,OW CC V•�' PtM�RA IINi �- rYl 1� ANN AYI:pTyVVw• W�Atl NOnutl. W�1p Nnr i L ii O A' �• Mb Urm..r rIP il°oiP.ljnN�O,•YJOmnou ij• 1 1 1 `erg__ ' , `= t,'- ��;_rl ; -�_•�3 I i I „I t e I � , I f I f I I ; I I I I ! I I I I I I I Ob ; ,f I I I Qj ? I � w I I :r• IT •I / '� l �c ^0q^NNhnW p�:v +,a `nw I 1�`l•-�w ^/1lC SSQII � W<YV tlVS 1 r �p=�A P.,N � <i 6nYw p�:O \\ •I�wYy �.+,'. e.Wp ` nMrlit .. o:, i✓titieaiw a° .n , ^(Y�_ SA p O bO ynnl "VU.°T IT�NPp TpTT rb �O K2 OFAON Qr CET yO Ty{blii=D .,°,YIOpaG'b• 3y /c°�_Qj� � I� Li�A ^i`!Nw Ortw !0001 )Tp T� fCiTT/� AyyOpp n TV. 1 n^ OA SM LII� Ow,� =y 00 w'ON jf1TN iT nC n't ^=yn..lT y V y ! rrnn .D I Vn'ib Jil by Y w'O=t O\ nFi�y2Y P # i I T \1 I F r PT T N! #f4.Y f\i I T I Tp I ' N r"n N FYyYMN SC � N Dq PCh` 1 ^^i'�^ ,'zT,joi "'.TAi �•�,o Tz C n�� +e'a f ILT T AT^ byL(�O�p� � �°Ow,s AO TT rlt, y� / ^' b P s•' F r n � N +M .,Aj� A♦ \Y e. Aw J.F Mill] •n yTTr.Ni O p 1 On b T iY brc Cif M A.IZI VT Tpb2 P1.. 'n ^.rl.hb 1 r YO�lT11 \ r yO��C}t�yT S�T ^= �TIA �y NT �M .f1P <i N 1 IqT� AL/ NTI \r \AYj.'^N I/TTA i Tn i O TT I Ap i9ti ��rllVT_j� n ,_ N N\ T N AD�b h♦ T 1 ^Inn o '^ri TFA' � (�In��ll'NO >e• Y` u° D !r°l I i AA N/ .D � y ?pb �n I I y 7PV2 b M• I N M T b T 100 � 1 M 1! yr �fypp?W VIy +P� °Op I � f I T I / //j•! \Nrlrpip VOVdgY bVO�p'.O O /MN P p b 1 n I N�OWO�wVN tlM<OO O O ~��Yy�VO�O I P I r 9w dvP: ily \,4VSOa��` li II NVMtiO£ OuMiNYIi�Iw O+� � I ! � /O�wO %IpD 1 nO�p0�0p4 NOVnryy wYY i I ` I I O ov Iiok °� ONa upp y o / I .\r{ hO •IC NIf M.4. °p AUDIU UM�.e <yy yl 1 iA r OOa pC600 ±iIJYY wyi C i� n 06 ^ °Sw�°g I•° IS I I f• Irf L I .r4 II t.'S1L4�tjli! 11' • ±n •P'J'«'INS I 1 I 001 W4 Yw Y' \own bbI 1 \ 1) b2grYDYVHJUy'P <YJY�'PY4V�b NPNr uu I eYY a "� a nYwNNN P N PMMNti. if 1'I�xY ^NPN DN����v�in ^O w 4YWy I� { ^�GCppryn jnO lwx° y?l ar SY) xYSTF t ITi° \I,I, /,I1 rI rY � Yf�w�^YO �L. �IIaiT�) «�sl� °Y +Y ^n >I ayT �Tn�N M+ ^1; 1`yI ITIp T KT b• aT S=D nN NT PDIN \ID Na p w �NTI n Y[1 ^ bTNm ^�1 ^ ^i'N+n`I�,]�E�`o� i n "T"�011 :n'lm b-Yim T SIS, ab 1be M� E.- I., E A =' _MY r w AN pn I O \S TT `. P^ O YT(pN T n0 �Tn ^; I y A Tni ifan(� = S • j '.TiN Hn j 1 PI 1 C a i N o aQ : ^.NI N F �• ' TNk r = r° 1 ' S�7Niyi\Y���ZTI,Inu ' I T 1 M 1^ 1 1 OT <��My ST��g pV*lIu by i II, <n�n Inn �D wp•y 1\I P��SY wrr TWby�AT��i�,°iO pp�tl' �N([I�NYi1O b IiSy S�Mp YNhMYr �M Y�T YKNA TMf �T ^i Tpb <I1 Yw v�Mw Trf fN� �O ^aPA� *TI 2a �T P�Ip`II� ar :I perA ( 1 nT 1 T j`CM �il YTTI Y T Tr °� ! YID rw .j( r Sy T p xa I S I tf TI� Tm� YQy < _�, N Nw 7 Tt )� x S • rI ^T N F Flri =n �wNI� L aY�Y,� IT / ' � .�, � �u Ir x �' 'tj ^I• iij.��a �K PI w.- = a I I(N1 O D •,_)' .OTa xx op O I I •P4n�jM« r • I 1.1 N Y ,IZNi IriT 1 nc11- i��'11 N }, ii i 1 wN'I,M1 b i 1 !.H n pNN p 1 i 4�N NMIpGS8 Ip Y{{{aaa 1 I /f�' I• I I�W HON H4 HH�VOH +OHSHNNg I00 I H 1 O u�001 1� I'• �yN.uJW y4N �CY.p = '` 4°I,°uMOaj 111 • N uP{,r� N � I a °Y rOOP MOPSP^jYYy N'n {"VN�O�NIYi y1 WN pN(- /q�(�.,I� N,+Iy.I 1L a I PYPSN YH" °OMB SODA S,V Py,G.P y4.p 1�`I N %a I,nl 1 1400 YNN�Ot M'n1 I Dr1, IP P[I I+PO I� N ODOOtlOV 00 ry \' I YVpIV �I I I I I I 1 I I � 1 I I I A,. i 1 I a2.YI}r}yw1{a10\ O.a.4y WyyIyyYW //11Iyy I 1 I ' I i KOiYrr I Vw! ar4.<JIVMV�+WMNytl Otl� 141 I 1 1 or }FF "•Y� wtnnf °OON'wO PHY DY, OYIW OS NP <, '> r• STP >Dnw wtr -wmaTw ZNOYryN xn C^r��A IIIm1 P ,• •..Ny'"Dr^ I r-o� z °�'ip"} '".N.i63.=rP= aT� i � ^y , yL ^00^ O Dml TCMI� MSnI ; 1 ism' �s •iil yNl oo1e�a °• v °i ym til°�'ri �ii'D � I ^ • I , , I '^ p" jy :y'S S�! <IID VCt''r jf0 x{H ' � 00 >� Y.G ISO a • I I I �D �;. ��si;esl � �, r I I I � -w �$ o�N mnrn��•'pl Or-� i Wk u; II 1 1 I D °•- O �r PlMtx'J'Cy �L y O u' I 1 D w> _n mOn+N Ylr` -m QiNi 1 �e e3 a4i°> Iyi Jyr x�Dm °r=.n xw TaO2N �a nwi i i I ��QDy Nn 7� ��rrLZ $c ��+ri m w � <DMNi mreW M 1� p„Vr r$1 I bH M 1 1 I � � I hn "' ^� T I J'•a�AI o� '^" l I I I\ SY y -� °P 22rr O Mh 2 hn S 1 ' = ZrrN �-rT c ym A'D A•1m mn 1 I 1 I i M (I.�r SD w� 1 6•, r I 1 I I °S O M In y 1 1 PPrQ° �PP�YO HH FRSyy N r u I1 , ; y 1II}�O -'^V• NyptlP pN�yy�S SSj{rin.HSP HHHHH I�:I c NN Ny rp{Ir P j 1 I °S� °tl NOL °0 IrYy VW �tl i. CO, WO'00 -VNI �a O aJ�O NPy ]}('u!6W .• I I I P Pub�O DO{r r� � 11 O 00 O.' ;• 1 Kn. _ 11 Yi F u F. i� i. tt 1. �r_.I /.YV�._ ttW uy �+Stfi9• --- 1i1 7a, T0, yR0li, 80aJEC7s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG ImIf0i U1iI A OctoDet J. 1905 ��Y Ji'i Hart d d,,,,rs of t6a City Council ddalotstrative 8arvicea Otr Receive acd FLls - CL He6°dule 8tetus R°➢ort 7O olavebo coca.age 9 °� anti heunrar ➢residlo 8avtogs d Loan seats Havtngs Bank 0enteo4ial 8avtogs 4 Loao Hm ➢ire Rational Dank yare,ura Savings tera Financial 8 .ce nlogs °! °°°Orly all l• signal Havin$e r. - DAr&_a H6--UZL- d1SQl= 02 -06 -85 03 -22 -85 09_. ' 02-23-&S 02- 2.5_65 10 -03 -05 02 -23-05 02 -25-95 10 -06 -tX 02 -26 -85 10 -06_85 04-16 -66 10 -14.86 01 -10_.% 10 -16 -85 1°7 100.000 0.05,500 100.000 0.10700 100.000 0.08750 100,000 0.08300 100,000 0.08875 100.000 0.06330 100.000 O.OyS00 100.000 0.08730 =i. r C 'etua Report P0L088s8 P1et9Qt °1 8eulo lN�BlrP P °11 8pr1: $1 6 LOaA soot Be 8n1o8a 02-,19,85 4 � ­41i_- F 0r Loos 8 paule 81 °leda & 8eck 04 -22_86 10.1j -8% _ pA�p�.4_lxEr no 100.000 yeti °rove Pi re leLa 4 Loa: O4- 21? -8S f0 20 -� 1p0 i000 0 08500 44 C Vice Chloou r° 84°loeealacke 0j -25 -F6 1p -20 -85 1p0•000 0.072500 qqqm 8 port pall DJ' Zack 04.21_ 10 -20 -85 100,000 0.0j3�50 ev Zack or Zt180j gar! :$° 04 -22_86 10 -20_88 l099•00p 0.08525 Foothill 03-30-85 10 -2p -85 0.000 0. pat tb111 ledePaadac 03-06. JO-20-66 1p0.000 0.06530 07500 pcu dtle 8s°lo8a Zaokt Bea} 09 -24 -85 1021. 100 .000 0.0g20 par . 8jr1oto 4 L 10 -24 -83 1023.8 100.000 0.08300 250 0eatuyelywlt8t 8ack eao 0,2-27 -85 10 74-86 919 � �4J 0.05050 Sac -06_85 8T 0.0 10 8are8rnrleet8av :.1988 4 Z. 03,0 686 11 -31- 100000 .085p00 8f 0 Cly� Of ZeuPOrt La 07-0,- !1'07. 100.000 8400 86 100. 0, 100 Po as J,Ir La °lots 03 -14- 6 1l -10 -85 000 0.08000 0 p/r'tF Ftrat Fedor l LO °e 7_85 11-14 -85 100.000 0.082.50 !0 OnWero eQeral 8Ai°8a Z 03'1! -86 11 lJ_ 0.000 0.08000 . yet ° .Wing. °ok 0373_ 11_I9_8s 500.000 0. Vericon 849.1 4 03_11.85 1j_Z6.85 100.000 0. 67500 �$° Loa 0 it ltao Solo8a c 032g_ 11 -26 -86 100,000 0. 8250 1 6 Aaerltec 8arle 11-04`886 12'01 -86 100s0p0 0.0800 $SO0 84elo4e 4 Loae La 06-OA .85 12-04.85 1p0.000 0. O `4S OJ 06-06-86 12 -05 -8f 100.000 0• oo - .} 42.03.89 100,000 0. 7600 0 80 0 tlS'sw 100,00 -- 0 0.080 ,♦ �Faall�l 3 °end Sts tat Faport RAToUrr Vatted Ntzreht Da —.PdJL� 440ar Urfggsr °k Pdlp r."g__ r First let erst 03 -19'86 � W -,-am rate dark 12-05 -86 1ltssip, Plejo g 06 -13-AS et -I Dank 100,000 0.075oo gScoadtdo 12••10_86 Uavta 05-19 -45 300.000 0.06200 8n 6 Loa, !2'12 -45 Dank of 4nerlcs 06-16-86 12y 100.000 0.07500 4 -45 California Federal 07 -01 -86 100,000 �� l2 -15 -45 0.08000 a 8aeiags 3 Los, 03.IS aS 12 -13- 970.682 0.06330 Fresco Dank of Capmerce 03-18 -86 12-IS-86 400,000 0.07630 1$taut Manufacturers 06 -19-85 12- e6 100.000 0.0 Foot 16 -86 4525 6111 Ipda 06-20 -85 100.000 Peadabt Doak 1217 -� 0.07625 National Ds rk 112-18-85 !00.000 0.06600 United Dank ,f L 09 -18 -86 a 3n11s 09-16 es 765.049 rreasurF 12 -18- DUlel c esublty Dank 06 -23 -45 12- 100.000 0.06230 22- yard Mattonal 07 -01_45 100.000 - "r dark 12.29 -g6 0.06500 }•, 4rrouhesd Faclf 07 -02'45 500.000 0.06830 to 8aelags 03 -11'86 12_ -86 Dank of .kterlcs 100,000 ' Bank 12 -31 -86 0.07100 Of 4eertca 03 -19-86 2 e7 100.000 0.08250 Dank of eoatheto 07 -13_86 01-0 300,000 Callforala 07.1186 01_12 -87 0.06875 !Sc urlq Federal 8nlaga 01 -13 -87 100.000 0.06173 !t ea.'Lngs gnat 02 -28.45 01 -26 -87 100.000 0.07000 Royal oak Sae lags 6 Lo 03-03 -86 01 -27- 100.000 0.0850 Upland Me ,,I D an 03 -L3 -4S E7 100.000 0 i ank 01 -27 -87 0.08500 _ g9ultec 01-27.45 100.000 01-27 -e7 0.04773 ' 01 -27 -45 100.000 7 0l -27 -87 0.08500 ^ rr' 100.000 - 9 A Iuvestaeat Status Report Page 4 PORCSASB MATURITY INTEREST FAIR MARKST -A YB DATA Awl= RATE VALUE Capital Dank 01 -29-86 01 -29-87 100,000 0.09250 Country Savings Pack 01 -31 -86 02 -02 -87 100,000 0.09500 100,r00 So. Calif. Savings A LOAD 01 -31 -06 02 -02 -87 100,000 0.09150 100,000 gel -Air Saving* 6 Loan 02 -04-86 02 -04 -87 100,000 0.09250 WeetPott Savings Dank 02 -05 -86 02 -05 -87 100,000 0.08750 Pauly Savings 6 Loan 02 -06 -86 02 -06 -87 100,000 0.08750 California Federal 07 -16 -86 02 -0 9-87 100,000 0.06400 Rancho Dank 02 -13 -86 02 -13 -87 100,000 0.09000 Golden Pacific Savings 02 -14 -86 02 -17 -87 100,000 0.08730 Cold River Savings A Loan 02 -14 -86 02 -18-87 100,000 0.08750 Secure Savings A Loan 02 -19 -86 02 -19-87 100,000 0.09000 Gibraltar Savings A Loan 02 -14-55 02 -20 -87 100,000 0.10250 100,000 Del Am Savings A Loan OP -26 -86 02 -23 -87 100,000 0.07250 Coast Savings A Loan 08 -21 -86 02 -23 -87 100,000 0.07000 South gay Savings A Loan 02 -25 -86 02 -25-87 100,0L0 0.08750 Mt. Whitney Savings A loan 02 -25 -86 02 -25 -87 100,000 0.08750 Guaranty Savings A Loan 02 -25 -86 02 -25 -87 100,000 0.08700 Century City Savings A Loan 02 -26 -86 02 -26 -87 100,000 0.08750 Mercantile Dank 02 -28 -86 03 -02 -87 100,000 0.08500 100,000 First Savings A Loan 03 -03 -86 03 -03 -87 100,000 0.09000 Southwest Dank 03 -03 -86 03 -03 -87 500,000 0.01850 University Savings 03 -03 -86 03 -04 -87 100,000 0.08750 Guardian Savings A Loan 09 -05 -86 03 -04 -87 100,000 0.06400 Brentwood Savings 6 Loan 03 -04-86 03 -04 -87 100,000 0.08750 Iovestment Bt Peg* 1 a tua Pa•ort Q^ Pflg_ CUSS Unto Pacific Beviegs 03- 0�4 -g6� XAIDP12P 78_jjjx— 8A�`r� o Pederal entoas 03 -04-81 100,000 0.0&s2s La Jolla Vl11 a8 03-04-86 a Dank 03 -04 -87 100.000 140battan Bed 03-04 -86 0.08300 Beeinga 03 -04-87 100,000 Guardian P 03 -05_y 0.08300 ederal Bavinga 03 -03_87 100,000 r1estera Pvill Beek 03 -05-iM 03 -03-87 0'08750 Weatco 8av 0j -06 -86 100,000 0.083C0 toga Dank 03 -06 -87 Itl0,000 Alvarado Dank 03 -11 -86 03 -11 -87 0.08773 valley 3atlonal Daoi 03»12 - 03_12 -86 '1o.000 0.08710 100,000 Ba °k of Awe 03 -12 -g6 0 87 100,000 0.08210 rfce 3 -12 -87 100,000 sun Bavlo a 03 -1J -&6 0.08100 8 A Loan .00 03 -18-$ 03 -13 -87 1000 0.07126 Ban DI equito 84tlona3 Back 03 -18-e7 100.000 03-19 -&6 0,087 Calif ... L' B Murf4 Dank 03-18 -87 100,000 4 Wilshire Center Dank 03-21-86 0.08210 03 -23 -87 8untin 03 -24 -86 100,000 0.08210 100.000 etoa Ba Clonal Bank 03'24 -87 Atlaotte 03_21 -86 100.000 0.08121 100,000 Pfnaaet al 3avinga 03_ 03 -23 -87 23 -H6 100,000 0.08250 Merchant's B, octal 03 -21 -87 100.000 0.08376 Cooaolld 03 - �1-QS aced 8erfnga 03 -33 -87 03 -26 -as 100.000 J.08210 JcoIr A *erfcan Botnas 07 -26-07 100,000 07_26 -FQ 0.0823 CCity lhrlft 0 6 Loan 03-26 -87 - Saratoga n i B 03-26 -as loo.wo 0.08150 A nga 6 Loan 03 -26_87 - Unit nk 03 -26 -86 100,000 0.08230 ad Aaericac Da OJ -26 -87 Colden Pacttic Dank 03_ 26•.&6 03 -26 - &7 100,000 0.08230 Butte: 04 -03 -86 100,000 O.0B0 fl eld 8 6 L 06'03 -P7 100 ,003 100.000 '7c 04 -22 -85 04 -22 -87 ,003 0.08000 99,000 08.000 c 0 Pita 6 meat 8q tae Report �TBABe De,uv(lle Savings Bank lbttual 0 6 L 04 -22 -88 Mt20g17r —'0°It-� ar,Qw 28 7 Aeaoc. 0442 -87 Mercury Sas as 04"14.86 100,000 6 Loan 04 -23 -B) 07.873 04 -:4-86 loo,000 Mobs Savings Loan 6 Loao 04'24 -86 04. 100,000 07 24 -97 250 2 °vestor', 04- Td -1}S 100,000 07.375 rbr(tr 6 Loaa 06-26 -87 C"' to' Bank of C,1(P. 04 -24 -89 100,000 Gold 04 -24 -g) 07.900 Golden Coto 8avin 06_28 -55 100.000 8s 6 Loan 04 -2Y�ZK 04 -28 -87 08.100 Wllsb(re 8av1n 100.000 Neal] to 6 Lo,a 04 -29-87 07.250 100.000 a Bank np Cel i/. OS-09 -� 07.300 seek °f Ban yt Wont 09 -11 -87 era Pedera7 s 6 L 0 .5 -12 -� 100,000 OS -12'8) 0.0775 05 -14-86 100.000 aneisco OS -14 -8) 0.O7,i0p Paramount S,,,,,,: 03 -19.88 100.000 Antelope ;,.11.7 8 Los, 03-14 -87 0.07875 03-16-as 100,000 6tocktoa g 0-3-16-86 05-18_87 0.073.50 95, vac evluse 6 Loao 0S -18 -8) 000 0.08000 Soo 8a +inge 6 OJ -16 -q1 700.000 Loan 03-18 -87 0.07750 southwest 9,r[n °340-85 100,000 trot $e 6 Loll 05 -20.87 0'07500 p 8av(a8s 6 Loan 05 -20-aS os 100,000 4o -87 °'0))30 Columbia savings 6 Loao 05 -21 -86 05-21 -8 100.000 0. 07 Bepubl it P 05 -22.80 7 100.000 8°0 Federal 8 05 -22 -87 0.07300 stings Coaamn(tY 7brift 05 -22 -86 100,000 ° 6 ,v(n rabo Los, 05-23 -88 05-22 -87 100,000 0.074.50 1"n t, 6 Loan 03 -23 -87 0.07,%00 8 and Bari 05-23-85 100,000 °g° 6 Loan 03 -23 -81 0.07600 ttook,lda Sav[ OS -T3 -qt 98.000 '.Wes Cgs 6 Loao 03-26 -87 100 0'07800 . t Coa t Soviet, 6 Loaa 05 -28-87 .000 0.07750 0 Z8 05-28 -O7 100.000 0.07930 100.000 0.07500 Pdlg v,-_ r yaPa°'e7 not Stec" BeYort tea`' D0$Cg4g9 $ui table 8av1It 6 L °aa terra Ibtlft 6 490 Sagtert Lora 06 -02 06-02-as pA1T srviags 06 -01_& 100 city 8avt 6 Lora 06.10. 06 -02-87 000 0.08000 Stan savingsa66yoaa 06-03. 06 -01.97 100,0p0 °•00050 I1ag seek 06-06- 06.03 -8) 0.07750 66 100. ImDetts 0.04.87 000 06 -04-& 0.07500 Peetura CttDrnat 1 gam 06.0q -g7 100.000 pg -05_� 0.07750 sterliq 100.000 some R savings 6 Loan 06.06-86 06 6 -05-e7 100.0p0 0.07500 Ibrltt d Losa 06-06 -g6 ~ 20-87 100' 0.07600 Colden Becuttry 06-09_ 06 -08 -81 000 0.07750 100 Fidelity Barbara 9 6 y 0696 95 f'b'09.87 100. 000 0.07500 eli4 8av1e p6 -17. 06 -16.87 0 0.07j gaak Sr 86 100,000 30 of sea Ramon 06 -17.� 06 -17 -87 O.C71p0 national dank 06 -18 -g1 100.000 of 06.1 y_ 0.08030 4aartoer Savtags 6 Loan 06 -2p-86 �6.1�97 1000,000 0.07830 America Cq C6-)O.gg 22_87 0.07300 Eretutl ra gaolg9ie6Bar., 06-2 -8;, 100,000 06.23-45 100,000 °'07700 1aDerial gavta8r °'0 30 06.13_ 06 -13.87 78 dS 700,000 Mcrtooa Igrarrest 06 -17`87 0'07625 First DeDOrit Saving gN&tato 0j -01 86 06-30 10j).000 0.07g75 8r gsak 0) -02-97 000 nn'tborae 84r1o8s 6 ygaa % -03 -� 0.01500 Inv °atmeat Bar 07-03-87 10p,00p 0.8. tats 4 Lo 07 -07_96 07-07-8. 100.000 °•000 ?" earl 15rlt 6rLea8r dank 07 -07745 07 -0187 !p0 100.000 0.08000 O° f sa 07 .000 i 0).0j -96 -07 -e7 100 °•07875 .j;Z+ 0j -07 -8j .000 0.07 • e�-;. 100. 500 00 ° S "i'� 0.08300 .� , Pat* g,�eot Seatus Report PURCUSE 1X *- Waebingroa Bavtnga 6 �.",vy __Rtzlt- Scat an �.a� Pd K11x87 evide lbrift 6 La 06- 16 -a $� ea 07-16 -111 Coeysrcial Center Sept 06 -16.86 100,000 07 -13 -81 0.08250 Aaado 07 -1&86 100.000 r faller savings 6 07 -20 -87 0.071,50 First Cp Loap 07 -10-� 100.000 nnarole, Sao, 07 -21- 0.06400 First o ^terra Be.. 07-21 -65 07 -21- 87 100.000 0.072500 87 Perpetual 7 -21 -65 07-,21-8;, 100,p0Q 0.072 Sierra Federal 1 SaV �: 3 Loao 50 . 07-21 -86 100.000 0.07600 Pioneer Saliaga 07 -21 -87 Salloga 6 07_18_85 100.000 0.0)300 Vt.S08 9alloga 6 L naau 07_18 -86 07-21-87 87 100.000 0.07500 11°00 S /VSO 07 -21 -65 99.000 88 0! Aeerica 07-21 -87 0.07300 Say Pt ev fed 07'27 -66 100.000 ere! Great Wae[ S 4 y 07 -22_ 07 -21 -87 0.07625 0.07623 Western S 6 y ai 07 -22 -87 0.07300 Cabrillo savings Beak 07 -iS-as 07-24- 87 100.000 0.07300 8�p. 4 Loea 07-29-86 07-2.9-87 ;p 100040.000 000 0.65000 Guyaaaea O7 -29-8 000 0.07230 UPirs- Callforata S 6 L 07-30-85 100.000 07'30_87 0.07550 Pacifle Segene 07 -30 -g 100.000 Bank 0) -30_87 0.07230 Global Savings Bark 0731 -86 100.000 0.08000 lol and 08'04 -8U7 -31-8) 8`1!088 8 Loon 0@"04-85 100.000 0.07250 7 P1 a84 savings 6 Loap 08-104-66 08-06'87 100.000 0.07600 Glendale Pederal 08-11 -as 100.000 08-11 -87 0.07625 DOV40Y satin 08-25-as 08-25.87 0.07600 88 6 I.", 08-27.8) first security 08 -26 -66 100,000 8avings 1181 08 -26 -87 0.06430 Liberty 8a1lcs s 6 Loaa 09-03,8S 100.000 09-08.87 0.06625 r 02 -13.6i 98.000 0.07375 � 09 -14 -87 10 'eta 0,000 0.09230 AS Investment Btatu• Repoz[ Page 9 ruRCRAS8 NAIORIyf ^' DAre ,—DAM— Mean _.INTEREST FAIRR HARXEr Peoninsula 8av/ngs 06 -20 -88 1r9.000 03 -20 -85 7rrrsoce Sevi21gs 07 -07 -88 07 -13 -88 100.000 100.000 e3 -2o -B6 Bnuschold Bank 07 -18 -88 1W.001 09-1 ¢86 00211 Bank 0¢19-86 Back of America 09 -22 -86 Bank of America 0¢23 -86 valley Federal 8 S L 09 -23 -86 Eastern Savings 6 Loan 01 -28-86 Cal America Savings 01-31-86 Camino Beal Savings 0"8-86 AOarloso west Be.,, 03 -0S -S6 International Savings Bank 03 -05 -86 Bidden Valley National Bank 03 -05 -86 Pan American Saving, Bank 03 -05 -86 Lincoln Savings S Loso 03 -06 -96 Los Angeles Pedaral savings 03 -11 -86 Bamlito, savings Bank 03 -26 -86 Universal 8mvic2s Back 03 -27 -86 Doan Witter Reynolds 04 -18-83 Commerce Back of San Luis Obispo San JOB* National Bank Valle Oa Ora Back id- valley National Bank 09 -16 -87 100,000 0.09000 09 -16 -87 100,000 0.08500 OS -21-87 100,000 0.07000 09 -21-87 100.00J 0.06100 09 -22-87 100,000 0.05973 09 -23-87 100,000 0.05925 09-23 -87 500,000 0.06700 01 -28 -08 100,000 0.09750 02 -01 -88 100,000 0.09600 02 -04 -88 100,000 0,06000 03 -05 -88 100,000 0.08750 03 -07 -88 100,000 0.08750 03 -07 -68 100,000 0.08750 03 -07 -88 100.000 0.08730 03 -07 -68 100,000 0.08800 03 -10 -88 100.000 0.09000 03-28 -88 100,000 0.08500 03 -28-88 100,000 0.08500 OS -15 -88 97,181 'Treasury Bonde2 06 -19-86 06 -20 -88 1r9.000 0.08000 07 -08-86 07 -16 -86 07 -07 -88 07 -13 -88 100.000 100.000 0.08000 0.07500 07 -18-86 07 -18 -88 1W.001 0.07500 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 1C0.000 100,000 100.000 100.000 1^6.000 100.000 100,000 103.000 113.531 100,000 IN, Inveetaeut Status Report Page 10 MAIM= PURCHASE MAIURITY DITAEES7 _Dk7E - HAL AMOUNT ,v. PAIR MARKET yALUa Delta Having, d Loa. 08 -08 -86 08 -08 -88 1001000 0.07500 Sunrise Bank Gatavay Savings A Loan Great Pacific Savings Desert Community Banc National Bank of Catalina North Coast Saving, Cocticonta, Savings Independence savings Heritage oaks Back Nestside Saving, 6 Lca. Hoeeatate Savings A Loan Suisun valley Bank Coast Back Regency Back Pacific Husine,s Bank Sacramento First Nations, Novato National B.nk 03 -14-66 03 -25 -86 02 -03 -86 02 -13 -86 02 -27 -86 03 -03 -86 03 -05 -86 03 -05 -86 03 -11 -86 03 -11 -86 03 -11 -86 03 -12 -86 03 -13 -66 03 -14 -86 03 -14 -86 03 -14 -85 03 -19-86 09 -14 -88 09 -25 -88 02 -03 -89 02 -13 -89 02 -27 -89 03 -03 -89 03 -07 -89 03 -07 -89 03 -10 -89 03 -10 -89 03 -10 -89 73 -13 -89 03 -13 -89 03 -13 -89 03 -13 -89 03 -13 -89 03 -15-89 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 0.08750 0.08375 0.09750 0.09875 0.09500 0.09250 0.09250 0.09150 0.09000 0.09000 0.09000 0.09000 0.09050 0.08750 0.08750 0.09250 0.09500 r 00,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 300,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100.000 100,000 Bank of Dal Her Bay Area Bank First American Bank City r., .msres Back 880 of :2mmarce Constitution Savings 03 -17 -86 03 -17 -85 03 -18-86 03 -21 -86 03 -25 -86 03 -23 -86 03-16-89 03 -16 -89 03 -17 -89 03 -20 -89 03 -25 -89 03 -28 -89 100,000 U.08750 100.000 0.09000 100.000 0.08750 100,000 0.08730 100,n00 0.09000 99,000 0.09250 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 100,000 100.000 /7 r t r� ;r ��I 0 Y$e 11 eqt Status ieport 1 POBCLISR MIURITI --"Z AM,,. INT88LST Pac[tic Coast 8 Soviets �BdS!` PA- RLHRFBT Palley Coanerclsl Dsgk 03-30 -89 I00,000 Stoekdale Savi ngs 03_12 -% 0-0700(p 09.08 -89 100,000 8 Loan Missioq Vell 4 Stay 03'19 -89 100,000 09'189 0.09250 100,000 Coveraaeot 03-26-86 100,000 0.09250 N at'1 Mortgage C°veraaeat 03-22-e6 09 -27 -89 100,000 0.09000 100.000 Nat'l Mortgage £DA CID 07 -22 -86 3- 15 -2QOI 94,634 0.08500 100.000 Loan Pool CAS 5- /5'2001 9 I3 %.323 Local A2encT Invest Fund 07 -25 -a5 .687 7 -25 2011 tp,937 O.OH500 722.119 � Local A Agency Invest Puad 12 -04-85 As Needed 2,2 vatisble 1.101.562 9 °°k of America 12 -20 -85 As Need •000 0408420 07 -11 -86 eA 2,7� t Passbook 0 0.08420 Sub Total, EAA.y 0.05873 33,163,917 i fi -� Page 11,2 een_t Status Report LVtaY PD-as Crest Western Savings F. (;rest ni�sera Sariogs Parsers 8avfu8e s Loaooa, Weetero Pi asocial Wea[era 10Plre Century Ssvi.gs 6 Loa. As of 09 -24 -85 PURCRARZ NAIT1R21'r — DAZL. AUQZU 09-05-86 Suh Total, 06 -02 -66 02 -25 -85 02 -25-86 02 -02_86 02 -25 -86 02 -26 -86 Sub rural, Grand natal, c ZMTEJEST PAI— D MARREr 10 -05 -86 4,427,538 0.05500 4,427,338 10 -03 -86 4 .100 ,000 0.06830 -03-86 100,000 0.08730 30 -06 -85 100,000 0.08875 10-20-ft 100,000 0.08530 02 -26 -87 99.000 0.08525 0.08750 4.399,000 44,197.455 el Troasury 8111, 4 Price halo. are quara, •2 meta eat roil are his an , =n Moth tof Yield t ost their value. � traded no I• s3 Sec Se, e),(eh lateraat earned on this !nv ,e 11 be 0468.04f oriaa e mortgages. are hacked b '111 he 834,000.00. pools of goverumeot Assured 8cta 4, All luyaseeots are Certificates guaranteed lcates of Deposit unless otherwise noted above. SON S i r DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT �,� `"'C" °,%�, o October 1, 1986 $ _z City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Linda Beek, Cngineerina Technician Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 9829 located at the northwest corner of Spruce and Elm Avenues, submitted by Lewis Homes of California Parcel Map 9829 was approved by the Planning COMMIssien on July 23, 1986, for the division of 4.36 acres into 1 parcel in the Terra Vista Planned Commnity located on the northwest corner of Spruce and Elm Avenues. The Oe to •, Lewis Hones socurity of California, 1s submitting an agreement and follow {nj * amounts- to guarantea the construction of the off -site Improvements in the Faithful Performance Bond: ;88,000 Labor and Material Bond: $44.000 'Copies of the agreement and security are available in th3 City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and eiementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. RECOIMMATION It Is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution Mapproving 9Pthe P 9829, accepting said agreement and security and p to record MaIcr and City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said Attachments ao CITY OF rmt: RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGDMMG DIMION dv 1 Tm. F3►,vu: N CITE OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGRFEMEMT FOR PARCEL MAP 4829 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in conformance with the provisions of the Municipal Code and Regulations of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the City, by and between said City and Lewis Ilomes of California hereinafter ref°r •ed to as the Developer. THAT, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop certain real property in said City located northwest corner of Spruce and Elm Avenues; and WHEREAS, said City has established certain requirements to be met by said Developer as prerequisite to granting of final approval; and WHEREAS, the execution of this agreement and posting of improvement security as hereinafter cited, and approved by the City Attorney, are deemed to be equivalent to prior completion of said requirements for the purpose of securing said approval. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the City and the Developer as fr, ads: 1. The Developer hereby agrees to construct at developer's expense all improvements described on page 4 hereof within 12 months from the date hereof. 2. This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement. This agreement shall be in default on the day following the first anniversary date of said approval unless an extension of time has been granted by said City as hereinafter provided. 3. The Developer may request additional time in which to complete the provisions of this agreement, in writing not less than 30 days prior to the default date, and including s statement of circumstances of necessity for additional time. In consideration of such request, the City reserves the right to review the provisions he ^eof, including construction •andards, cost estimate, and sufficiency of the improvement security, and to require adjustments thereto when warranted uy substantial changes therein. 4. If the Developer fails or neglects to comply with the prrvisiors of this agreement, the City shall have the right at any time to cause said provisions to be completed by any lawful means, and thereupcn to recover from said Developer and /or his Surety the full cost and expense incurred in so doing. 'D.) Office of .theonstruction Permits wit): tot -May, and theEngineer Pesr to start all st of ofa^Y work Developer from the of the he regulations contaf ed herein, start rork D t conduct such work within the Y tha City, and assn. such to full c Public constructed •ssment of the Penalties PY result 1no stance Spec Public �rIght -of. Improvement Provided, PPing Cons Ificatlonsln confo Construction and Standard lelthy aPProveedment work necessary shall Include arty )rawln s any mpruvementeQplaes shall b� 9 and 1 during onstructionage or D licnsafetns and /or othe incidental is thereto c'n lneer, shall special amendments Standard 9 Revised oosa orr d Ponrors plannedons of ised work dve ! ected u omml5sions discovered .Is Planned works. a9reemertt and seeuredmbdificat ons shalltuon of the City Y the surety covering orig the completfo Work done *'thin existing 91na1 event of unJustiCit dnlal have nOBrhirLcts Ry and Incurred fr the rf uplet 6e diligently om the Develo y 'n completio complete a gently pursued to Per and /or his c and to recover all all work In the The Develo,er ontractor Y lawfulost and expense or removal Of an by °n means. the required work comPOlnent hoa %1 be responsible the water to the satofa Irop atiun for replacement . ralocatlons, system. water the City Engineer in confllct with and other 9. The Developer shall b and the owner of debris from the Public right- ° res i0 f Nay le for removal of all loose rock by the CoRiminity Devalopnent shall Director�t and maintain Parkway trees as directed PPruvaleofoa ryes city f the terms af"Y to be ,efurnished Y the erurltY shall not b this 9 ement Developer e less than the amount Principal amount of be sub . per to amount down: of said J.ct to the Improvement A, i� FAITHFUL PERFORNANCF Type: Principal Amount: 88,000 (lame and address of surety: MATERIAL AND LABOR Type: Principal Amount: 44,000 Name and address of surety: CASH L£POSIT MONt1MENTATION Type: Principal Amount: 1,250 Name and address of surety: TO BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE CIiY IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be lily executed and acknowledge with all formalities required by law Opt the dates set forth opposite t sO 5urF LEW1 H M LIFORNIA, a general patcnership Date U;Z9/24 by i AL(4 Developer gent Author>'ige t re gent ante Date by Developer gna ore Printed Accepted: City of Rancho Cucamonga, California A Municipal Corporation By: _ ) Myvor Attest: Tity CT`e—rF-- Approved: � y Carney '— } DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURES MUST PE NOTARIZED >" AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE a if _254 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING OlVzSlBj ENCROACHNENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE For Improvement: Date: Aueust 1 Parcel Ma No. 9829 5 ruce File RT`� Ave• Park Site -�� City Drawls e a NOTE: Does srot include current fee for smiting permit or pavement deposits 458 L•F, P.C.C. curb - °RICE AMOUNT S. F, Bike path B C.F. 24• gutter 6.00 S,C, 4° P.C. (Elm Ave.) 2 74a �1� S.F. C• sidefealk (Spruce & Elm Ave,) 12 .So --- S F. Drive' aPproach_ 70N Crushed der 00t (per inch thick) 0.03 �— Stre (under s tons) Street lights 60,00 L F. 24rkway culvert 1000.00 —� EA. • Catch basin W . 150,00 EA. Local depression 14� 35.00 EA' Parkwa 3500,00 -�+5u� L.F. Remove redwood header 2000 00- T4 ; F Redwood header 10I -T� '•P• Community Trail 1.00 1.75 1 20 0 Rbd'_. ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE 08!i 'RESTORATION 4 /DELINEATION CASH 4 005 SUB Tpigl DEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE) -L CONTINGENCY COSTS 79 16�c MONUMENTATION SURETY (CASH) 1.250 FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND (100x) 'gg�p'0 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (50X) *Pursuant to C1tY of Rancho Cucaaonga Municipal Code be made Prior Code Titles, Chapters 1 -5, a cash Issuance of . Title I, Chapter 1.08, adopting San an Engineering Constructlon Permit. delineation de Revised 3/89 posit shall MIN GUARANTEE NOyPASION ERFORMANCE (SETTING OF I IPA MONUMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. pox 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentlemen: PurSUdnt to Chapter Article l the her by agrees that monuments shuwn on the finamap of Parcel Map 9829 are to be set and furnished by the subdivider's engineer or surveyor on or before as Surveyor's Cert cote an agrees to urn sii the snotesl thereon htoEcompletesall or engineering requirements specified in Section 66497, of the Government Code. The undersigned hands you herewith the sum of $1 No.� ,Z50 (Receipt ^7 , a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuments wilZZ � l —V y as set and the notes furnished as above 1 provided on or before the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor wt 1 be paid by the undersigned. further yy complete theaboverrequirementsrwithin atheetime specified, inthesCltydofaRancho completed and theocostdthoreoff complete beta charge cause them to deposit, and the City of Rancho Cucanonga is authorized to make the necessary transf, from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It is further agreed that if the undersigned does nut present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed to Section 66497 of the Government Code, the City shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. If the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to a after receiving written statement from the City Of re RanchotCucamongayspecifying the amount of the difference between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirements, Cordially,`(.;{ / I N 1FORNIa Authorized Agent lc wONFC nF raI • P 0 Box 670, 1356 North 91785 Mountain Avenc Subdivider e Upland, California Address Date Auoust 28, 1486 The depositer of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) shall be LEHIS R0.4E5 OF CALIFORNIA, P, 0. Box b7G, upland. I Name CA 91785 ess ' NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED IN TRIPLICATE ME Y•y � RESOLUTION NO. (, - a 73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOhGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9829. (TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP N0. 9829), IMPROV9IENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY NHERLAS, Tentative Parcel Clip No. 9829, submitted by Lewis homes of California, and consisting of 1 parea], located at tha northwest corner of Spruce and Elm Avenues, being a subdivision of a portion of Lot 1, as shown on Tract No. 2202, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 34 of Maps, Pages 67 and 67_ 1/2, in the office of the County Recorder of said County, and that portion of Section 1, Township 1 South, Range 7 Nest, San Bernardino Meridian as shown on Cucamonga Fruit Land Company's Subdivision, as per map recorded in Book 4 of Maps, Page 9, in the efface of the County Recorder of said County was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamcnga on July 23, 1906; and WHEREAS. Parcel Nap No. 9e29 is the final up of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map; and WHERE, rerequisite to approval ofthe final imp by the ,City Counci,r f said City shave now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement guarantied by acceptable Improvement Security by Lewis Homes of California as developer. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and Parcel uthorizedotogpresent a same is CountyeRecorderito bedfiledOfor record. D9 k CI:Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r )CAtm; STAFF REPORT o DATE: October 1, ISM 1977 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: located or, they ast�side of Milliken Ave Avenue. north of Highland Avenue, submitted by Marlborough Development Corporation Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements for Parcel Map 8617 were approved by the Ci.y Council on May 2, 1965, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $288,000 Labor and Material Bond: $144,000 The Developer, Marlborough Devolopment Corporation, is requesting approval of a 12 sinh Improvement iyCl Copies of the Improvement Extension Agreement available in the Cterk'sofice RECONAWTIOM It is recommended that the Cit Council adopt th- attached resolution, accepting said extension agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Res ctfully su itted, ZA ta0ments q ' 00 1 ry 1 'b CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGirmmING Drvi&oN m- MR. cr-�' PARCFL NAP 8617 • ,�unil: t 1mPExtAgmt IMPROVTY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHr• EMEMT EXTENSION AOREfjENT FOR Parcel Map #8617 10c All man OY THESE PRESENTS: fn conformance with the provisions Rancho Cucamon a That this agreement is made and City, hereinafter re"7rnito a munfcf the Subdivision Ma entered referred to as Pal corporation P Act of the Cttytof Oevelo as the City, and Marlborby 8nd betwe he the per. ugh Dev en t said orpora aon elopment THAT, 14HEREAS WITNESSM: City as a requisite tovlssuer entered into once of buildings Improvement a 611EREAS, said Develo er g Pvrmfts agreement with the the said f P desires an and mprave4wnt agreement. extension of NO;i, THEREFORE time to complete the follows: it 1s )ereb terms of Y agreed by the City and by said Developer as The oae let ton date of the ote1s of the mprovement Le.e hereby extended by a period aPPreval of said agreemenr_ months said i 1 y�j "M /A 2. 3. 4. -- same. ---..•ins of the said As evidence of understartdin Improvement agreement comply with g the r shat; securit same, the Develu P ovisfons contained herein Y. and has affixed His er has submitted signature the below CvseribedO' intent to hereto: lmprov ement 3v 17/86 w t, z• t Description; FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND Surety: Additional onal Principal Amount: NONE Descrt "ATERIAL AND LABOR BOND Surety t1on: Address: Additional Principal Araun t: NONE CASH ,EPOSIT }CJNUMENTATION BON, Additional Cash Deposit: MAINM!"CE GUAAARiEE BOND 70 be posted prior to acceptance of the Principal amount: NONE '�`"'+ *�* *►r...r,myy�y�� prnfeet by the Ctty, •err CITY OF CUCN4pHGA CALIFORNIq,I a amnlcfpal corporation BY e reY n9. ayor Attest: every u e e ' LY er t� DEVELOPER f �+ MAPLBOROUGH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATZO aia �e em cc 'rea ent a `bo ores n , 0 B s /tom` • ' '+crstary xv NOTE: FORM ORM MUST Be COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE eihAR DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE MJST BE NOTPRIZED RESOLUTION N0. z A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEYW AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL HAP 86517 , a,Fas. rhasi o tf Rancho emCaliforni h foit cnsid ratign an Improvement Extension Agreement executed on may 2, 1985, by Marlborough Cevelopment Corporation as developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property Milliken described of Highland and Aveou(,;andy loafed on the last side of WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, 1n said described Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to ed conjunction with the development of said Parcel Map 8617; an inns in d WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and me accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which i in said improvement Extension Agreent, s identified NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvemeynnt Extension Agreement and herebymauthorized5 to rsignbsaidy Impr ovement ement are ExtensionpAgrementdonh behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the Csty Clerk to attest thereto. .s •3• y 6 W.:, N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 1, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 9896 (D.R. 86 -09) located between Milliken and Pittsburgh Avenues and Fourth and Sixth Streets, submitted by Bixby Development Ltd. No. 1 Parcel Map 9696 (D.R. 86 -09) was approved by the Planning Commission on June 11, 1986, for the division of 35 acres into 13 parcels in the Industrial Specific Plan Development District located between Milliken and Pittsburgh Avenues and Fourth and Sixth Streets. The Developer, Bixby Development Ltd. No. 1, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts:* Faithful Performance Bond: S295,ODD Labor and Material Bond: $147.5CO Monumentation Cash Deposit: $ 1,850 *Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. C r. &R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Parcel Map 9896, accepting said agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agrement and to cause said map to record. Rea LBH: /®r Attachments . n. ..... j.,1 1 I.O r. I O rhl c � P CITY OF 1, RANCHO CUC.AMONG.k ENGINMMNG DIVISION 3v I ram. N PARCEL MAP 98� Fa7CiiIDIT: ' CM OF RANCHO CUCAMOMGA IMPROVE w A�EEMEHT FOR PARCEL MAP 9 --96 (DR 86 -09) entered 1nio; AU MEH Ev THESE PRESENTS: Regulation. fn Conformance with the That this are corporation, the City of Rancho Pr °vislons of 9 ement is made and Bixby heretnafter referred toucaon9a' State of the Municipal Code and hereinafter re�'erred Limited., as the City California, H0' l+ a Californlyd between i municipal i to as the Developer, Limited Partnership Property TiHnAi' W CItY'losaid be�'eln,.,. desires to P Fourth and Sixth Str Bets; and 'ifllfken and Pfttsbue certain real 9h Avenues and said Deve "p �`. S said City has established Prerequisite to granting certain re WHEREAS 9 of final a roval:ean to be met by security + the execution of PProra l; and to be ty as heretnafter cited this agreement securing safdlaPDrovajrlor completfonyof said by Attrrney, Improvement ements fo, deemed Hrf+ THEREFORE t'e purpose of Developer. follows: it 1c hereby agreed by and between it" City and the I• The Developer hereby agrees to hereof, rovements described on page 4 construct at developers expense i hereof within 12 months from the date Of the Counc•l This agreement shalt be effectly this in default on the day City appr a on the date of the unless an y follcwtn9 the if agreement. This agreement resolution shall be Pravlded, the of time has been ^nfversary date of granted by said Cft said approval 3' TFe Developer may Y as hereinafter thhe Provisions this agreem2nt,`gInst tang not time fn which to to additional if. ' and Including a stateemmeintno not less comp let right to review the In consideration of of circumstances of days Prior to estimate, sufficient hereof such request, the C1t necessity for adjustments thereto Y of including constructlen Y reserves the when wa.antedhby substantial security, and to cost aP this a � If the Developer fails or changes therein, require doing5evelopeFband /or ehlstYysaYllawfultm`at519htt at any time toeCause15safd said D .Vle.ed b Surety the full costa and thereupon expense increcove In so 1 911 Studebaker baker Reed C 8aach, CA 90815 S. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Enginee• prior to start of any work within the public right -of -way, and the Bevel. r shall conduct such work in full compliance with the regulations contained therein Non - compliance may result in stopping of the work by the City, and assessment of the penalties providad. 6. public right-of-way improvement work required shall be constru ^ted In conformance with approved improvement plans, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings and any special amendments thereto. Construction shall include any transitions and /or otner incidental work deemed necessary for drainage or public safety. Errors or omissions discovered during construction shall be corrected upon the direction' of the City Engineer. Revised work due to said plan modifications shall be covered by the provisions of this agreement and secured by the surety covering the original planned works. 7. Work done within existing streets shall be diligently pursued to completion; the City shalt have the right to complete any and all work in the event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Oeveloper and /or his contractor by any lawful means. 8. The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocations, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with the required work to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of the water system. 9. The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rock and other debris from the public right -of -way. 10. The Developer shall pldnt and maintain parkway trees as directed by the Community Development Director. 11. The improvement security to be furnished by the Developer to guara.itee completion of the terms of this agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The principal amount of said improvement security shall not be less than the amount shown: j s� Tiae; Name and address of surety: R Type: d Name and address of surety: TYPe: CAS71 Name and address of surety: FAITRPUL PERFORNAVCE DEl'ELOPfnclPal Amount: 333 191yy� INSURANCE MATERIAL MD LABOR, Anahelo, AW $295.opp �7 92801 DE 3-- OPf�tPal Amoun 333 NMha t NSURANCEt .SZT NQY Anaheim, CaA g 801 $147.500 INMIITATItJY Prfncfpal Amount: ro bi duly TO BE pp IXBY DEV et Ili e f rth oEandNacknoy� heRFart /eSACCFPTgNCE RY illE CITY Oate ELOPNF PpoStte ty dse ..... hem.._ NT LTp. N0 6y pate t 19 Accepted: C1ty of Ra A Municipal Corpu�attoga' By; Ca H fornfa Attest; ty erg . Mayor Approved: ty ttorney DEVELOPER. Ayp NPMEU CO PLETFD RES .N 'MIPLICATET�IIED $ l.B5o these prese ed by la,, onsthe 'Wknt a "ai Partner Secretary OMNI CITY OF RANCHO CUCOJVMGA I ENCROACMMIMEER1ryG DIYISIOM For Inryrovement: Fif EMI PERMIT F Date: Q_13.66 th Street From EE SCHEDULE File Re erence• Milliken to Pftts6ur • —` ClIty h for P. 9896 Y Drawi g Nu, Ma uscoe ams NOTE: n ran �t Does not include current OUA.vrrry ___ i^'lting Permit or pavement deposits or 1 327 rrtm L. F. P. C, C, Curb _ PRICE S.F. In P,C.C. B C,F, 24• gutter AMOUNT —"� S. F, Drive idewalk 9,00 _. S.F. B. P C.CP �rossparcel 7 1, _ 11 943 S.F. Pre gutter and Q only 2,50 , T S.F. Partition of sub�rade(inc' curb 3.40 �— EAN A.Csh(SOOg o 900eton$) Inch thick) 0.10 45 00 EA. Stre t lsigns SCPC. curb &agutter nly 1n00.00�' L F Sa „EeL re lace Std #507 200.00 EA. replace A.C. SO0.00 ��- ��DOd� S.F . L a et eand irrigation � 5,00 300.00�t� 2.75 ENGIME5RIMG INSPECTION FEE S J *RESiORAT10N /DELINEAiIOM CASH ���r . DEPOSIY (REFUNDABLE) ' r UU0 SUB TOTAL MD•NUMENTATION SURETY (CASH) �� CONTINGENCY COSTS $256 304 S 1 B�— LABORFpPERFORMAry�ESBOND (100%) ��33gg� 'Pursuant to Cit MATERIAL BOND (50% M. Bernardino County �R80itl Cucamonga NunSipal Cude , S '' __ be made prior to issu Titles, Chapters 1_ Title I once of an Engineerin ' n cash restoration Chapter 1.08, ado Revised 3/84 9 C0 ^struction Permit, /delineation adopting San posit shall r� 38 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE NO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FIIAL MWIMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final map of Parcel Map 9896 are to be set and furnished by the subdivider's engineer or surveyor on or before November 1987, as specified to the Engineer's or Surveyor's Certificate and agrees to furnish the notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified in Section 66497, of the Government Code. The undersigned hands you herewith the sum of $1,850 (Receipt No.c974/ as a cash deposit, said deposit to guarantee that the monuments will —Fe set and the notes furnished as above provided on or before the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor will be paid by the undersigned. It is further understood and agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the time specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to complete said requirements or cause them to be completed and the cost thereof is to be a charge against said cash depo ^.it, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It is further agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and if tke engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed in Section 66497 of the Government Code, the City shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, tha cash deposit herein made. If the cost of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pay the difference within thirty (30) days after receiving written statement from the City of Rancho Cucamonga specifying the amount of the difference between the ca.h deposit and the actual cost of said requirements. Cordial;y, SIXBt OEVELOPHENT LTD N0.1 BY: BIXBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. General Partner Subdivider 911 Studebaker Road Address Long Beach, California 90815 Date August 29. 1986 The depositer of record (for return of any portion of the cash deposit) 5.',511 be BIXBY DEVELOPMENT LTD. N0. 1 BY: BIXBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, General Partner Nave Address NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGHED IN TRIFLICATE 39 RESOLUTION HO. 8(o — a %$ A RESOLD ION OF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO C;,_Ar"O APPROYINa PARCEL MD rIMPROYEY.ENiC SEC+URITYO. 98961. IlU'ROYEKHT AGREEMEM, QevelopaN!atELtd •No Tentative a consisting off 13 Parcels96located betxeen Milliken and Pittsburgh Avenues, and Fourth and Sizth ��baitted by Bixby of San 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 6085 as recorded to Streets, 70 being 7q_ of San Bernardino Caun being a division of Of Rancho Cucamonga on June 13ap19E6� A 9 77, records Y th_ Planning Commission of Use City approved WHEREAS, shhmn 9896 Is map of the division of land Map; and approval WHEREAS, EA the ,f1na1 aOf the requfrements established as by entry into an Improvement e y the CfV Council of said City have nowubeen met Security by Bfxty Deelopnt Ltd. Noni assadeveloperY acceptable Improvement mP ement Rancho C c0amo THEREFORE . Caf rnta,T RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Improvment 9 ' that said Improvftent Agreement and said approved and Sec my submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby on behalf of the City is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement that said Parcel Map o.f9896cbe and the same�is hereby MY Clerk to attest; and Engineer 1s authorized to present same ame to the Count Recorder to and the City Y Recorder to be filed for CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 1, 1986 ti 'DO: On TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd D. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Imiprovecent Agreement and Improvement Security for Parcel Map 9064 located at the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue, submitted by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -day Saints Parcel Map 9064 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 11, 1985, for the division a' acres into 3 parcels in the very Low Residential Development District located at the northwest corner of Hillside Road and Haven Avenue. The Developer, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -day Saints, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts:* Faithful Performance Bond: $29,000 Labor and Materia; 8nnd: $14,500 Monumentation Cash Deposit: f 1,350 *Copies of the agreement and ser.r,ty are available in the City Clerk's office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Mater District. RECO19 MOATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing Parcel p O horizingtheMayorandCit accepting i agreement y Clerktosignsaidagrementaand toccause said map to record. Respectfull�t" ILSH. BA a Attachments q/ ■) ■, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIUMMING. DIMON m I artc �I ( ITEM. TITLE; PARCEL HAP 9064 EXi mm. V N •Ili 11, I!I I i W HILLSIDE RCAD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGIUMMING. DIMON m I artc �I ( ITEM. TITLE; PARCEL HAP 9064 EXi mm. V N CITY OF RANCHo CUCAMONGA IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR PARCEL MAP 0064 KiinN ALL MEN 8Y THESE PRESENTS. That this agreement Into. in conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision on ad State of California, and a °ement 1s made and entered Cucamonga. California of the applicable Ordinances of the City Of the hereinafter referred td as the municipal corporation, b and hereinafter referred to as the Developer Y and between y of Rancho Of R „� Said City, .,ne. 4 ,.T V..,y.A�•M �b,M N, uITHESSETH: said City WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop Ma 9n Y as show;' the conditionally approved subdivision known as parcel said P 64; and P certain real property 1n Develo erEyq�prerequlslteas est bovaleofcertain requirements the ro.tb,fe$t corner of a to Hillside Road and q ion general to l met b Haven generally locatedaon NOd, THEREFORE, Avenue , follows: 1t is hereby agreed by said C1' •y and by said Developer as I• The Developer hereby agrees to construct - fmprovements described a Page 6 here -of effective date hereof, at Developer's ly nt expense all within twelve months from the the council agreement shall be effective an the date of the resolution of default on the day following thetfirst rannrversaThis agreement shall be In provided, extension of time has been granted by date of said approval Y Bald City as hereinafter hereof. 3. The Developer may request an extension of time to complete 30 days Such request shall be submitted en the of circumstances rnecessitatingithedextensionfof Y in 'itfnot less than and shall right to review the contain a statement thereirJs, cost estlaaievrsl °ns of this t1o�' The City shall have the thereto if any substantialachangerhas occurred during "thedtermthereofstructton Y, and to require ad3ustments 4. If the Developer fall s ar neglects to comply this agreement, the City shall have the right at an provisions to be met by mp y with the Provisions of Developer and/or b his surety lawful mecns y tf"1° to cause Y the full cost and expense 1 cuj.edecover from a�liie S• The full shall provide metered water service to etch lot of development in accordance with the regulations Cucamonga County Water District. schtJules, and fees sale Of the C/0 RON ISHII 3813 SCHAEFER AVENUE SUITE H CHINO, CA 9111,1 V3 6 The Developer shall be responsible for replacement, relocation, or removal of any component of any irrigation water system in conflict with construction of required improvements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the owner of such water system. 7. Improvements required to oe constructed shall conform to the Standaro Drawings and Standard Specifications of the City, and to the Improvement Plan are tabulated on nthe file Construction Office and Bond Eztlmate,nhereby incorporated non page 6 hereof, as taken from the improvement plans listed thereon by number. The Developer shall also be responsible for construction of any transitions or other incidental work beyond the tract bound•,ries as needed for safety and proper surface drainage. Errors or wmaiss.ons discovered during constructln shall be corrected "pun the direction of the City Engineer. Revised work due agreement andnsecuredlby thessurety c venngethe original planed works. this 8. Construction permits shall be obtained by the Developer from the office of the City Engineer prior to start of work; all regulations listed thereon shall be observed, with attention given to safety procedures, control of dust, noise, or other nuisance to the area, and to prcper notification of public utilities and City Departments. Failure to comply with this section shall be subject to the penalties provided therefor. g The Developer shall be responsible for removal of all loose rocks and other debris from public rights -of -way within or adjointgg said development resulting from work relative to said development. completion; ion;the City hall have the n rightetoscomplete any and alll worksindthe event of unjustified delay in completion, and to recover all cost and expense incurred from the Developer and /or his contractor by any lawful means. streets and aeasementspein shall satd subidivtslons following edicatietibn and adequate w n said work a improvement by said City Council, give guod and adequate warning to the traveling public of each and every dangerous condition existent 1n said street cr easement, and will protect the traveling public from such defective or dangerous conditions. Until the completion of all improvements, herein fncorpor;.ted on Page 7 , to be performed, each of said streets not accepted as Improvements shall be under the charge of sold Developer. Said Developer may close all or a portion of any street subject to the conditions contained in a temporary street closure permit, Issued by the City Engineer, whenever it is necessary to protect the public during the construction of the Improvements herein agreed to be made. 12. Parkway treeq required to be planted shall be planted by the Developer after other Improvement work, grading and cleanup has been completed. Planting shall be done as provided by Ordinance in accordance with the planting diagram approved by the city Corn:unity Development Director. 2 y� The Developer shall be res health until the end of the whichever ntenanceall trees in after planting. whichever for maintaining is later, Period Planted good 13 The Developer ;s res °r for one by the City pursuan pons W Year agreement for ter the Subdivisionrryetlog all conditions constructed tb" development thereunder and for theP Act, City oor Lai"' {establishes the City, and no until the improvement maintenance before such accepsanceounless security provided hercepted for nc Council eme "t 1s Improvements of the y othe maintenance Cit , ^+ise provfded andnauthoShall be released securic This agreement ized by the City agreementheteinaftnr descr bell not tennenate until the maintenance to th. Cittogether with the re has been released D Council same by a successor to Vuired improvement a the City, or until security therefore been accept d berein named security has nail a new has been re leased, and this 'and by as o {submitted agreement the City 15, The Improvement the improvement agreement shall'nP,°Sieaent security to 6e the City Attorney: of the following and shall by the Develo with be to a e Der this A. To secure faithful form acceptable b q bond performance of a Y sureties or bonds by one this agreement Section 66gggtje font and more dul ;Uthorized corporate 3, sP rnfedvby�trye Cet rity Instrument jn Y Governmen• b pec if � Code A deposit with the tY Attorney, the g To approved for y of money or negotiable and content 1 secure laborerssaniring deposits o{ gotiable bonds A bond or materialmen; Public monies. of the kind sureties he fore and or moraDectffedut, corporate Z Settlan 66499, p, content �ortzed Pec1 fedieme "t it Ins nt in by Gaver runent 3. by the tame Code C. A case dePOS1 fors urtnyofttm0 "eY °r negotiable the form content approved it and h deposit With the Cfty to to.,ds the With or of the kind for the setting surveyor whose certi{ "tee payment b monument s and or furnfshinndar t -ate appears upon etle Final Mao amount of the de Y, 1of. corner, and street the rroh as acceptable Da g centerline tie notes to the Centerline Y be any amount certified 6 City, Th© contained her shall be Yrent in fu 11; or, If no value is sub,. or herein. sh °�'n on the Construction and Bondubmitted, recel t b deposit may be refunded Estimate Of payment InefCi City the centerline soon rotesrocedure from the enginear or surveyor, and �r 1tten � assurance ��� 3 5L5 "* -he required bonds end the principal amounts thereof a ^e set forth on page 5 of this agreement. 16. The agreement shall Dbeefreerfromrdefec defects that n matertalsvandnaarkmansht described in this all portions of the lWrovements found to be defective withfn one 1)y and following the 43ta on which the improvements are acrepted by the City shall be repaired or replaced by Developer free of alt charges to the City- mar Ueveloper shall furnish a maintenance guar,,itee security in a sum equal to ten Percent (10>;) of the constructl3n estimate or $200.00, whichever is greater. to ten to secure the faithful performance of Developers obligations as described in this paragraph. The maintenance guarantee security shall also secure lye faithful performance by the Developer of ary obligation of the Developer to do specified wt,rk with respect to an Once the improvements have peen accepted and aa maintenance sguara annteedsecurity has been accepted by the City, the other 1provemant security described In authoriied by the Sdbdivlsfon Map Act tlaat such release is otherwise and 17. That the Deve oper shall take out ndpmaintain such publicnliabillty subcontractor damage Insurance as shall protect him and any contractor or property damages which may oariseobecause of this nature neof from claims for the operations under this agreement, whether such operations be bye him Work or from saldcpersons�revensthoughrsuchrc +amages beenotrPaused by of the by Developer or even enc loved he Persons. The Public liability anduproopertyt damage anyone nances shall list5the City as additonal insured and directly protect the City, its officers, agents and employees, as well as the Developer, his contractors and his subcontractors, and all insurance policies Issued hereunder shall The minimum amounts of such insurance shall be as follows: so state. A llabilityr, limitsbioftnotnlesscthanoU00000ofolr each person or death $1,000,000 for each accident or occurrence, and Property damage liability limits of not less thar $250,000 for each accident or workherem thehoperatlons of theiDeveloper rOin the performan fch the D. Autoenbilen liability insurance covering all vehicles used to the limitsmOfcnot of lessithan9$500,000 for 1e3ch Personyan S1,OOpiabilfor each acclden. or occurrence, and property damage liability limits of not less than $250,000 for each accident or occurrence, with an aggregate of not less than S500,000 which may arise from the opera- tions of the Develop ,, in Performing r or his Contractor the work for herein. ffie ;8ih thet before the sPeciffed insurao e.a execution oI this a Precluding the c E s lcate or certificates emznt, the Deve)o by such certlficateejlatlon such certfficate have before t °r reduction of insurance err carrier, received notlf the exPlratton 1n coverage of bear an cendor °g tithe IcatfOn by re of thirty (30J days Po1fcY evidences As evidence 9�stered mats 1r after the comply With °f understanding the from the ImPravement save, the has PrOVisIonsu insurance security, and Subdivfoer contain affixed hs bmitted°dtheerefn, and of Intent to signature hereto poltovIng described 5 y7 1 .� 3+ Type: FAITHFUL PERTORMWE Name and address of Principal Amount: surety; Type: MATERIAL UD LABOR PAYMENT Name and address of surety: Principal Anount: CASH DEPOSIT TYPe: MOM MENTATION flame and address of surety; Principal Amount: Type: Name and address of surety: NAIMTERANCE GU&w(TEE Principal Amount: $29,DOp $14,590 $ 1,350 H/A ZU TO DE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE DY THE CITY uuly executed NESS HEREOF, the Parties dates set fort and acknowledged w. S hereto have caused then h oPPOS1te th��- eh ,aol formtlities squired presents to 6e Date — b�� . > tY law on the Y ���. gnature Developer iiw u %o'•. l'-.N/ r �'�n e A uEAAQ�IUI . QA P—..r by SrgnaturDaveioper Accepted: r ntea city of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation tt By; Attest: .. Mayer Clay Ulerk Approved: City Attorney DEYELO�P�'S SIGNATURE MUST DE NOTARIZED CQ'IPI E7ED TRIPLICATE [III CiTY 0# RAffC1,O CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING ENCROACHMENT PERMIT LFEEISCHEDULE For Improvement: Parcel Ma 9064 Date: June i0 file ^e erence: City Ao: man E Bets uerra Rev. o. NOTE: Does not include current fee for writing permit or pavemnt deposits QUANTITY Li7IT ITEM PRICE AMOUNT 1154 S.F. Drive approach 2.50 4_ EA. —� L.F. Removal Street lights 1000.00 T— EAF Outletstructure Stdr0506 3.30 — L.F. COmmnity Trail Improvements 1500.00 25.00 ENGINEERING INSPECTION FEE 1 430 SUS TOTAL 255 8771 *RESTORATION /DELIHEATIOtI Cl,SH— CONTINGENCY COSTS DEPOSIT (REFUNRETY ( FAITHFUL PERFORK4110E SONG (100X) ' 7V6_w_ _ NONUMEMATION SURETY (CASH) 1.350 LA80R AND MATERIAL BOND (50X) •Parsuant to City of Rancho Cucamonga ftnicipal Code, Title I, Chapter 1.08, adopting San Bernardino County Code Titles, Chapters 1 -5, a cash restoration /delineation deposit shall ce be made prior to issuan of an Engineering Construction Permit. Revised 3/84 V9 SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE UO PERFORMANCE (SETTING OF FINAL MONUMENTS) City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Gentlemen: Pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 9, Section 66497 of the Government Code, the undersigned hereby agrees that all monuments shown on the final map of Parcel Map 9064 are M be set and furnished by the subdivider's engineer or surveyor on or before August 1987, as specified In the Engineer's or Surveyor's Certificate and agrees to furnish the notes thereon to complete all engineering requirements specified in Section 66497, of the Government Code. herewith guarantee that6the0moneuments v I set and the notes furnished as above provided on or before the date specified and that the engineer or surveyor will be paid by the undersigned It is further understood and agreed that in the event the undersigned fails to complete the above requirements within the time specified, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to complete said requirements or cause them to be completed and the cost thereof 1s to be a charge against said cash deposit, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to make the necessary transfer from said cash deposit to the credit for the proper city fund. It is further agreed that if the undersigned does not present evidence to the City Council that he has paid the engineer or surveyor for the setting of the final monuments, and If the engineer or surveyor gives the notices prescribed In Section 66497 of the Government Code, the City shall pay to said engineer or surveyor, the cash deposit herein made. If the cast of completing said requirements exceeds the amount of the cash deposit, the undersigned agrees to pa) the difference within thirty (30) days after receiving written statement from the City of Rancho Cucamonga specifying the amount of the difference between the cash deposit and the actual cost of said requirements. Subdivider Ferri A A,4W& _ A U*I.Ai2CU Air j Address SCI LAST" l��n- RTH / r olp).0 � H 47 (N t<E �r ry e `1� �. Date _ un" . ee depositer of record (for return of any Portion of the cash deposit) shalt Name ----Ti1d r ess NOTE: TO BE SUBMITTED FULLY FILLED OUT AND SIGNED IN TRIPLICATE so S, SPECIFIED ACTIVITY CERTIFICATE No. 4 S -$L INCLUDES ADDITIONAL INSURED CERTIFICATE HOLDER: And Additional insured: The City of Ranchu Cucamonga, State of California, its officers, agents and employees. This is to certi y to the certificate holder listed above that the following policy of insurance has been issued to the named insured shown, is jn force at this time, applies with respect to the named insured-5 specified activity at the location of the activity and for the period of the activity (all as described below), and that the limit of liability under such policy, with respect to such activity, shall be as stated below. This is to further certify that, with respect to such specified activity at such location and for such period of activity and such limit of liability, the person or organization listed above as certificate holder shall be an additional insured under such policy. However, the coverage afforded under such policy for such additional insured shall rot apply with respect to any occurrence arising out of the sole negligence of such additional insured. NAMED INSURED: THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER -DAY SAINTS ADDRESS: 50 EAST NORTH TEMPLE, FLOOR 22 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84150 TYPE OF INSURANCE: COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY NUMBER: 3YM 462 351 POLICY PERIOD: MAY 5, 1986 to MAY 5, 1987 SPECIFIED ACTIVITY: Contractor's Liability insurance LOCATION: City of Rancho Cucamorga, State of California PERIOD OF ACTIVITY: July 21, 1986 to May 5, 1987 LIMIT of LIABILITY: Bodily dui, or death liability LLaits of f'00,000 per persos� $1 ,000,000 par occurence Property damage limits of S250,000 r accident S 00 000 aarre CERTIFICATE ISSUER: AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY LONG GROVE, IL 60049 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE:_ CPaig K, Poulton" This certificate may not be Authorized Agent amended or cancelled without 13 days prior written notice mailed to the certificate holder at the address shown herein. DATE ISSJED: July 21, 19F6 t- RESOIUi1pN N0, CAJCAI AUi1 GL�pRHIACITM COUNCIL OF 71lE CITE' '� IMpR0YE1fEPl�lTCEL yAp' APPROVING PARCEL OF RANCHO SECURM ' 9064 , �' 1 ASER 9064, 1 I!'1PROYEl� • AGREE7fENi, Jesus Chr(st of • Tentative northwest laoter_da Parcelao Na conststing of b par' The Church of Portion corner Y Saints 9064. Submlitgid Gook 19 of ,a south Hillside 12 o Road and Planning aps, .PPaj e 5 records" 10 Of Sc olwaiteenue g a Elvfsianaof ha 9 CaowlSS! 9e 75, records of 6ein the City of Ranch, Ornardfno Sounty sion as recorded a Cucamonga on Se 'as approved by the aPDroved as shown' on said Te�'0- 9064e s th tfnal real Il, 19851 and approval Of the all of The rcquir Dl andmaP of the dfviston of land by ant to final map by the Ctt ements estabifshed as Security bfnto an loprovement Y Council Y The Churth of JesusAgr�nt guaranteed ofd City have Prerequisite to Christ 't Latter_ by acceptable een met Rancho Namon a I7 b • THEREFORE RESOLVFD day Saints as developerimprovement Cit g , Caitforn aPDroved and qty submitted by saidsefd 1 rovety Council of the Ctfy of mProvement Securi rnia, that Y The City on behalf of the Yor is If d val that said Parcelet Y authorized to Per be and A regiment said Engtneer is au P N0.f9064cho Cucamonga, and ign said Impa Same are hereby record, thorized to be and the s the Cify Clerk ement Agreement present soma to tha County Reycoapproved to attest; and and filed City C17Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 1, )186 TO: City Council and City Y Manager Lloyd B. Po:bt.:, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion TR 12590 -1 thru 6 - located north side of Base line Road East of Haven Avenue DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P 0. Box 670 Accept: Upland, CA 91786 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) Release: $ '17,000 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $9)0,000 Tile required street improvements hava been c mannar and it 1s recocmended that City Council m0e accept accept the Malntonanee omRleted 1n an acceptable the LitY Engineer t Uuaratee Bond in the amount said fmproveoents Clerk co release the Notice Bond it the f 597,000, authorize completion Ana authorize the City Respectfull submi ed, amount of $970,000. LGH: Iw Attachments RECORDING REQUESTED CY: CITY OF RAHCK CUCAHONGA P 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED HAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANC110 CUCNIONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucananna, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned 1s an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described -eal property, the naturs of which interest or estate is: Tract. 12590 -1 thru 6 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: RANCHO CUCAMONG.A. 9320 -C Base Line Road, CITY OF P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. -' On the 1st day of October, 1986, there • completed on the hereinafter dcscribed real property the work of impro, •,t set forth in the contract docrmients fer: Tract 12590 -1 thru 6 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Lewis Homes 5 The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: North side of Baseline East of Haven Avenue The street address of said property is N/A CITY O.° RANCHO CUCAMOKA. a municipal corporation, Owner ate— S� - OYYTT -Fu s ,, � Y —TnEOr . ,r RESOLUTION NO. 8(p _a77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THi. CITY OF RANCHO = CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IM?ROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12590 -1 THRU 6 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION rOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public, improvements for Tract 12590 -1 s thru 6 have been crpleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NON, THEREFORE, be it revolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized-to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. L 1� •1 r •X 55 m C1T1' OF RANCHO CUCAMO, iGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 1, 1986 TO: City Council and City Y Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond Tract 9539 _ Located on Jennet and Sapphire North of Banyan 168 00 DEVELOPER: Plaza Builders Devonshire Street Release Granada Hills, CA 91344 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $9,290.00 The required �afn free maintenance period has improvements r the�nded that City Council defects in materials ended ano the ec amount of $9,Y90, release the workmanship, street 00. Maintenance Guarantee and in +le,p subm ted, si d r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Octobpr 1, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd S. Mubbs, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Guarantee Bond Tract 11013 - Located on Amethyst and Banyan DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P. 0. Box 670 Upland, CA 91786 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) The required one f7,340.00 inprovcnents remain free from defects inrmaterials and workmanship ,siteis recommended that City Council release the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $7,340.00. Respectfully ;u fitted, L :CB.dlw y 57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 19, 1986 70: City Council and City Manager FROM; Lloyd B. Mubbs, City Engineer BY: SUBJECT: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion DR 84 -49 _ Located on Utica and 4th Street DEVELOPER: General Dynamics Rand Curt 4th Street Cucamonga. Release: CA 91730 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) The required street Improvements t66,Op0,00 manner and it is recommended that been c authorize the Cft onrne ^ded that City omPleted in an acceptable the City Clerk t releas- theoFalthful PerfofofaCCept said Improvements S66.No.00. ompletion andau orze rmance Bond in the amount of 4e5 tfully Su tad, t�me Attachments 'y. .; i• �+w " r,�. RECORDING REgUESTED 8Y. CITY OF RANCHO Ranch osCucn9a U0fo 1 n1a 91730 WHEN RECORpED g4' C 1 T0; C1TY Cl P. OF RA11CH0 Ran hoDC_= 3o CUCgNpi f�n1c 51i3p NOTIC —�' NOTICE IS HERERY GIVEN E OF CoMPIEyION her einaft The undersl TMAT, IS: er des undersigned 9ned is an RANCHO 2• The full real prop" DR g Qg atu�e of which intc eat for estate California gI730, 9320 and atir of th C Line a and 3. Road, P, p, undersigned owner 1s• hereinafter described rea AroferO to6��r, 1986 Rancho CITY OF contract documents for: Cucamonga, Y the work cf there was CoVIeted on improvement set forth in thn a whole was: OR 84_49 the was The "�� o► the orf 91"l contractor for the work of improvement as ►olo Cuca eg�eal property refneral Dynamics laws: County of San Dernardjoo °rein is situated and dfs"deser bey as The street Utica 6 4th Street address of said property 1s N ',A l' Lamm.— a e u1TV OF RANCHO nicipal cor CUCfo a Poratt n ° • Owner °y 4 � a Ty r RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUt!OH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIVY OF RANCHO COCAftGA, CALIFOZIIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR OR 84 -49 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING 0. A NOTICE OF .. COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public Improvements for OR 84 -49 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion Is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE, be It resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is -authorized to sign ane file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, 1. F pit \ .y J 0 b. 1 >Y S -R � s nrrt.v no neucun PTMA%TnTlrA ,.r..._ REPORT STAFF of .. DATE: October 1. 1986 TO: City Coum it and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs. City Engineer BY: Paul Rougeau. Traffic Engineer SUBJECT. Approval of an agreement with Ludwig Engineering. to perform a traffic study in connection with General Plan Amendment No. 86 -02A and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 86 -01 As directed by the City Council at its August 6. 1986 meeting. requests for proposals for the above referenced traffic study were issued. Six proposals were received from responsible traffic engineering consultants; of the six. Planning and Engineering staff interviewed four. The firm of Ludwig Engineering in San Bernardino was determindd to be the best qualified with regard to the understanding of the needed study and the proposed methodology for the study. After " brief negotiation and "scope of work* clarification discussion. the consultant's proposal was submitted at the 'not to exceed' rate of $10.300. RECOMMEADAI I'" it is recommended that th- :ity Council approve the attached agreement and authorize Ludwig Engineering at 109 East Third Street in San Bernardino to begin the study with the results to be delivered within 45 days. Resp ctfully subm ted. LBH. :me` Attachments (P • AI v ■ t PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREENiEN7 This Agreement is made and this tat Of ac�a� Cor__• Igoe entered into Poration (her between the (herein elnaft referre„ City of Rancho C day cr ucamon attr referred to as ga . a Municipal A, Recital, 'CONSULTANT,) CITY') and �+'Zc END. !s_ wccNUUc (i) CITY Pertaining t has heretofore o the Perfo fssoed Its Preparation of rmance of Request Professional Services ices Proposal �T>;:nWOA APra T�rrzc with ith STUDY espect c pthe ('Project+ hereafter), (11) Performance ormance of such has now services, submitted Its (Ili) Proposal for the services CItY deslr necessary to es to retain commission render advice and . City Council as$Istanc CONSULTANT to Ty. erform professional staff services and is CONS IR„* represent, he PrePar •• ^n of Pr Project. Planning wilting to that defined. Perform such it is qualified to Professional Perform such services as hereinafter B,oIAZ eemenOW, IIfEREFORE• it 1s agreed by and between CITY and CO ' NSULTAIT as 9 1. ta Oeffnftlons: The following followin re s. m4s' except the a drof tfons shall Quire whore can text of this apply to the 315186 Agreanent otherwise �':, ,. (a) Pro ect; The preparation of � � —perses T Fpi INPACT STUDY described In Exhibit. •A" Scope of Services hereto Includin to, the preparation of ma 9, but net limited presentation oral and In wr both wr surveys, reports, and documents, the iting, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports +nd documents to CITY as required and attendance Public hearings and other at any and 411 work sessions, project as outlined in the meetings conducted by CITY with respect to the i Scope of Services. (b) Services: Such professional services as be performed by CON , -e n +cessary to SULTANT In order to complete the protect. (c) Coma lotion o• Pro ea; phases of the protect The data of completion of all The any and all procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral Presentations and attendarce by CONSULTANT at Public hearin acceptance fr gs regarding the tonstiuctfon is set forth Project attached hereto, in Exhtbtt "B• Project Schedule Z• CONSULTANT a rees as f, : ?� (a) CONSULTANT $hail forthwith undertake and complete the •` Project in accordance with Exhibit "A" and applicable with Feieral State and CITY statu;as,regulations, ordinances and guidelines, satisfaction of , all to the r easonable CITY, (b) CONSULTANT shall supply reports, Plans copies of all maps, surveys, r and documents (hereinafter "documents ") including all su collectively referred to Exhibit { pplemental technical documents s "A" to CITY within the time specified i uments, as descrlbed,in n Pr i oject Schedule, Exhibit ,' f 1111 ,, ir:, Copirs of the documents shall be In Exhibit •A•, such numbers as are required by CITY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY, The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 0 ?.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY, (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANTis expense, secure and hire sole cost and such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement, event any such other persons are retained b y CONSULTA In the NT. CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such Persons shall be fully qualified to Perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY, 3• CITY a_ or_?esas follows. _ _ e (a) TO Pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of 910,70910,30 =__ for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT, payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made the schedule set forth in Exhibit •g•, 1n accordance with (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be Paid within a reasonable t#me after said invoices are received by CITY. All urges shall be detailed in Exhibit •C• either with respect to hourly rates or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no ` r - -33- �T T. - event, however, will said invoices exceed 95% of individual task totals described in Exhibits "A "and "9" (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event, shall CITY be required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum in excess of M of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in farm and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY, (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, iu writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, shall be paid an a reimbursement basis in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "Co. Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly basis and shall be paid by CITY within a reasonable time after said invoices are received b•r CITY. 4. CITY aarees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, which CONSULTANT considers necessary in order tc complete the project. (c) Such information at is generally available from CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and /cr private parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT'S responsibility to mate all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such Information. .4. 5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and other identified materials shalt be delivered to CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain :vch copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, clai.; and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , its staff or 1 authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon s the giving of a written "Notice of Termination• to LONSULTANT at least fifteen r (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event this Agreement is so terminated. CONSULTANT shall be compensated at j CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as set forth in Exhibit "B ", on a pro- rate basis e'rh respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the ! date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximwn specified in paragraph 3 (a), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to 4 CITY any &, %d all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, marls, models, m' photography and reports, whether in draft or float form 1 {� , prepared by -5- ��j.•� fVf r CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not terminate tnis Agreement except for cause. 7. Notices and Designated Reoretentatives: Any and all notices, demands, Invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Mr. Clyde sweet r tudwiq engineering San Bernardino , Calif. tir. Paul A Rougeau -r Clay of Rancho Cucamonga Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thereof in the United States mall, postage prepaid and properly : addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until It has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on t subcontract until all insurance required r r of the subcontractor has been obtained. CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: �• (a) Worker's Comoensation Insurance: Before beginning ; ' wurk, CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof `• w that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for ail persons ,i j whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work 'al lyspecified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. -5- In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code ;! Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his ' employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: u ? "I am aware of the provislons of Section 3700 of the Labor Code `4 which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' r compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions ,5 of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the Performance of the work of this Agreement ". (b) Public '_tabilitb and Property Oamaae: Throughout the '• term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, CONSULTANT 1` shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and affect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public 'f liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal � injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT'S activities, r providing protection of at least One Million Dollars (51,000,000.00) for ,N bodily injury or death to any one person or for any one accident or occurrence " and at least One Million Dollars (S1,C00,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ( "malpractice ") providing protection of at leist Not Auplicable for errors and omissions ( "malpractice ") with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY, +• (d) General Insurance Requirements: Ail insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only In _7. Gg r• v. 'ii responsible insurance companies licensed to do businzss in the State of California and policies required under paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional insureds CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer, insured and all subcontractors waive the right of subrogation against CITY and CITY's elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies are primary and noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days- notice by the insurer to s CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such policies promptly upon receipt of them, • or certificate evidencing the Insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not requirci under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification: CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal costs and attorneys, fees, in any iaanner wising out of any negligent or intentional or a willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in thu performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignment: No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. I e11. Independent Contractor: The parties hereto agree that CONSULTANT and its employers, officers and agents are independent contractors under this Agreement and shall not be construed for any purpose to be employees of CITY. 12. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of th3 State of California. 13. Attornev's Fees: In the event any legal proceeding is Instituted to enforce any term or provision v' the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shalt be entitled to recover attorneys, fees and costs from the opposing party In an mount determined by the Court to be reasonable. 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing,'between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowled;es that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing signed by ail parties. IN WIVESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above: CONSULTANT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON —Tf ray King, Mayor ATTEST: ever y utne e , .y er .g_ 70 Date: 9.z -,ra Date: Approved as to form: 7 i .• pit EXHIBIT ,4, GpOP$POR WORK FTIWA1VDA AREA T RA D•S Ip IMPACT INTRODUOTION The traffic impact study he■ been requested oddItIin, on Baseline Avenue and Rtlwm,da sddltlo,al ■ for s, area Avenue rem of concern 1■ the intersection Avenue. B The and VI torte Avenue including the stretch o RtiwaT e development R!S tam ° to Beet Avenue, ■• P qt of t Victoria 1 and Z, related to the The Victoria area to lightly developed o Vletoria Community in the northwa It ■ea Fl guru I. utaide of the Avenue 1a The existing davelo uadvsnt of the area. Rtiwanda host intense south of peont along Stlwagdn School District facilities loo aria Avenue with the treat rural !Along Vletoria Avenue, there are east side of the Avenue YDe netting, with a •hell tract very nice homes in Just east of Rtlwanda Avenue. o north of Victoria Rtlwanda Avenue is algnadp tot epetoloctlthe a special Overlay District which L des! beautiful tree lined area. Rxlstin integrity of this traffic carrying c■paait Rtlwanda plan■ show Co,eequently, the Ave,Ue that the constraint _ Study of analyst • Vivienne limited. ■treet are exceeded °q if ythe !raffle ong to require sons • for this SASIO INFORMATION The basis iy willLb n to be used in develop!,, the the °et study will ba the traffic information the! !raffia 1) R`Swaoda Specific contained in Z) Victoria Community plan and SIR, 3) Traffic data Pla, and SIR, end data suDDlied by the Olty, A review oS the available data from the above plane one that node Studied conducted, give as ■• fle Indication required date p Lonyforethie at'uaolleoted a• testis ox ens part of the techniques our alternative ■ilea Provide The requirement In order to • far using for, dayslops*0t altorn■tivss, horn adequately examine ads Y examl,a these STUDY rgCgNIoars The study Currently generally deecrjhea Ube thd d nbay soLudwig agOBiaeerie AnelYele A. Date Colectlon ae dacuaonteg• The Mod lodfa city The extentrof raffle dgarin"orineoring et the and avie he lo Peak ahosriappros fie counteiBCai°sa Prey with the rho Afterwlth the CltY datell Erie ling rrth(d � will be refined k addlt10 consultation 11 be field Aal Yale terial iw ends traffic Aveau count. twill City Traffic dire ClionaModel !aP"t septloa�ictorlu treat s •toff• drlveweye.l voiaaex at as the trio Provide .ad Poes gees analysis IA order he stud rat b... Local Trofbly we' °t Site r to ad Y into, for tic one to the dg 4O ins Site the 2•a °ep Provide for and the efts Road. 0 latersectlass 0041 let., access Victoria eV�a t1I "EtdAV.... and fete lode9uateti °s orlft Park The vas 'ad Trip Can.ratloa !. Aveeu. °aslysla oa davelopaentriP -ends thO "Ictorol 1Co! "Pct rforaee, will ba °f °ech of ue «d t Coke orient. The Ouch four Bo,Posse data ib °lbutld J thei iaee da Specifi Pr °Pared its 1. will ^Se ueeagtOff- 'TheiePUt4w113ead uaeiford 1, plan lr+l. Cho to Istrib Zoe see rat-fIc nod frog for tithe study aalaaiig iativ°he t affic insthnie NOdel hfLriiy the C' Traffic Node 3 sad site 2.Id -out Pstgt area for rise 3 Constraints In tla. traffic Stestrelate raffle each r_Itorl will be elf The autivs used turn rsatrletiosai sristh de or tIge ad is e aecees sl�alq be ad rs edlvewe Y . D Alternative Site Traffic The Local Traffic Analysis Model will be run for each development alternative and the model results will include: 1. P.M. Peak hour and daily volumes on the study area arterial street system. The section of Victoria Street east of Btiwanda Avenue to Rest Avenue to specifically Included to the street system for anllysis. 2. The traffic distribution to and from Site 1 and Site 2 and the arterial street system, including Victoria Street east of Btiwanda Avenue to Rout Avenue. 3. Directional traffic volumes at the study intersections ofi a) Btiwanda Avenue and Bose Line Road, b) Victoria Street and Rtiwande Avenue and c) Victoria Park Lane and Base Line Road. d) Victoria Avenue and Sant Avenue. B. Traffic Analysis The build -out traffic from the LTAM output will be aoslyzed for a comparison of the eff,.cts of each site development alternative using the output of the wedel a■ specified in D., Alternative Traffic Models. Each alternative will be compared to the basic recommendations in the SIR's and to City Standards for the point in time of site build -out. The analysis results for each alternative will provide the geometry and traffic control at each of the study intersections and a level of service (LOS, V/0 Ht.TIO) assessment of the need for ■ignalization upon opening of the commercial centers, Site 1 and site 2. l An initial assessment of the Bite 1 and Site 2 entrances will also be included to determine if stop control would provide an adequate level of traffic service or if the `- entrances will have an$ level of traffic service effects on Tt' the streets adjacent to the sites. 4 `73 i; `x .y STUDY RRPORTINO AND STUDY PiRIOD It is anticipated that ongoing, weekly coordination with the City Traffic staff will provide adequatu information for the City staff so that a draft report will no: be needed and, consequently, a draft report review period is not Included in the study time period. A report will be prepared to present the analysis and f edicts at the end of the 46 calendar day time limit from the time of approval to proceed, currently scheduled for October 1, 1886. Ludwig Yneinearint will provide ten (10) copies of the report to the City. Any rev:sicas requested to be mode to the final report must be made outside the 46 calendar day period. Three presentations are included in the study, one brief presentation to City staff, one presentation to the City Couucll and one presentation to another public meeting. It to anticipated that the two public presentations would occur beyond the time limit for the study itself. A - -'ITV . 7� J w Mr LrXRXBXW B WX"Z saunDuzB STUDY RRPORTIRC AND STUDY SCRRDULR With It to anticiPsted that on�oigr, weekly the City Traffic Ra`ineeriar ■ eek adequate igforptloa y coordlastloa report 1111 net for the Clty staff •o will privf dr re:lew period to be needed dad, coasequentl the, o draft not Included !q the study biro Period. eport fludlnrselotr�ewill be Prepared to present the anal • Ootoberr 1 of approvalfto proceed1ender day tiro liaitof%ad the final report Sru• A °y ravirioa• requested currently scheduled for Period, t be reds outside the 45 calegdnr° day SCRRDULR PUA9R HDeR P•Yaont Pent Date Collection $1,000 X ; Traffic 10; Nadel Oevalopreat 55,000 X Y ; Traffic Analysis sox 9z,suo X X x X Reportlo 25X R to City 9trff ; X X X X X Plael Re Inc. Dort 51,800 = X x 15Z if .a 41, , ; 1. �l ewe , 0 W, 1 C, EXHIUIT C t J � ri1 .4Yn�� 1 ZUDWIG ENGINEERING OP►ICR RATE 4CHUZUZR En9lgeer149 Aide I 1 95.00/kr, UNIX rield Gee soerslsu I t S6,00/hr, Engineering Aide Il t 78.00/Ar field Crew SuNmhor it 1 68.00 /hr Engineering Albs tit t 30.00 1Ar, 2814 Survey Crew MI.00 1kr Deslguer /Dreftaa I 1 33.00 /kr g-Na Sarver Crew will END silLOGAr. Dlsigeer /Dreltsas It t 37.00 1kr 3.1to Survey Wet iW.W/kr. Wslgner /Or6ltsun Ill 1 43.00/hr 3-W Survey Crew will END 110.00 /kr Designer /OOftsaf IV 1 87.60/Or Electronic Neesering Device 1 60.00 /dly Senior Designer I SLOO/Ar Nllagg 8 MUM. Project Engineer I I S5.00/hr N4tedejs end Outside Contract Kirk Cost Pigs got project Engineer 1: { 60.00/hr ProJrt En91nte1 III t 61.00 /Ar. Project Mannar t 64.00/hr 8rlaclal Engineer 8 73.00 /kr rise led us,11J1 run hill 11.14. ,2 l /e,2t ..tat burl Ise .4 tell fall. altrr ,2m1 In, tat staled Mae shall be turned . ,211,211.• 1. 10u41n 14 rans that see 11,2104 naruna Is ast. ♦ uJna. 1 ..... .. Jars, .1 1.11 I.r shall rr.. asks .d a/allq ..11 be 411ln1d lu .14 1•t.uU nb is airy nrt " t J � ri1 .4Yn�� 1 P' Mrs, ro, r80N, SSSJSCr, °a'ud.1, o 'STAFF R CUC oIV October 1, 1986 Clry Seta 1Coeao'1 "Id City A. „___ WAR= d. datbejet �MSGL City Cjork t le racatvay abort for ble tee Drtor to Coa ell Aoattag 33 be b..oded out as •oca u ;ty Y%'ili L %F •'Li Y` f� Lsi, ai sC �j .4a Y` f� Lsi, i n, s nV D A Wr'TJn lT iC A MAN!! A ..r.. STAFF REPORT DATE: October 1, 1906 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jim Hart, Aftinistrative Services Director SOgJHCT3 AUTCMtfATTrA TO STGH c yr at C COOQT DOCOM�T9 Occasionally, the City most pursue collection of debts through use of Small Clain Court. To process documents for Small Claims Court actions, individuals who sign the documents most be formally authorized ca do so. Attached is a Resolution authorizing the T.usines• License personnel, A6sistant Finance Director and myself to sign Small Claims Court documents. FFCOMMENDATTOH, Council adopt the attached Resolution authorizing desigoated personnel to sign Small Claim Court documents. Respectfully submitted, Jim Bart Aeaioistrative Services Director JH,cv i its, ' RESOLUTION 110. p l FIST C A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OV THE CITY OF + RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 81 -154 -E AND NAMING THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO STILL HE 4LLCWED TO SIGN SMALL CLAIMS COURT DOCUMENTS. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. ' does resolve as follows i In order to comply with the requirements of the municipal small claims court of the County of Sao Bernardino, it is necessary to name certain individuals as those persons authorised to sign court documents as required on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. THEREFORE, the following named individuals are authorised to sign all necessary court documents: Jim Hart Administrative Services Director Liz Stoddard Assistant Finance Director Betty M. King Business License Technician Deals* Butt Business License Technician Brigit Ts!e Risk Management Technician q, y r r 77 v CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT��� 0 0 DATE: October 1, 1986 tw TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner SUBJECT: REPROGRAR41MG OF CDBG FUNDS SET ASIDE FOR NORTH TOWN PARK MTE ACOUL51FION 10 Bt USED MR 93(Tff--TMF-7= L 1. ABSTRACT: In the 1985 -85 Comunity Development Block Grant program, $150,000 was set aside for acquisition of a park site in the North Town neighborhood. Since the site will be acquired through other means, these funds can be reprogrammed for another project. A public hearing is required for all reprograming actions. Staff recommends reprogramming to the fund for development of the North Town Park. II. BACKGROUND: In 1984 -85, $150,000 was allocated from Ccm nity 10-a-vol'o-pme-nT Block Grant funds for acquisition of a park site in North Town. In 1985 -86, an additional $150,000 was allocated from CDBG funds for park development. Staff has reached an agreement with the property owner to acquire a five -acre park site in exchange for drainage improvements and other considerations. (Approval of these agreements is a separate item on the agenda.) As a result, the funds set aside for site acquisition can be used for development of the park facility. III. PUBLIC REVIEW: Federal regulations require a duly noticed public hear ng or a reprogramming decisions. Notice was published on August 8, 1986. No written comments have been received. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the reprogramming of TI5TX00_Tn I984 -85 CDBG funds from park acquisition to park development for the North Town Neighborhood Park be approved. Res fully s fitted, fB Buller City Planner BB:RY:dak OLJ A� I I RESOLUTION 50. 86 -272 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMCA, CALIFORNIA REPRO:RAMMDNG PONDS FROM THE 1984 -85 COMMUNITY DEVMOPMMT BLOCK CUNT IROCIAM FROM NORTH TORN PARR SITS ACQUISITION TO BE USdD FOR NORTH TOWN PARK DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga operates a Community Development Block Crant Program in compliance with the regulations established by the O.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; sad WHEREAS, the City Council allocated $150,000 from the Fiscal Year 1984 -85 Community Development Block Crane for acquisition of a site for a ocigbhorbood park in the North Town notabborbood; and WHEREAS. the City has acquired the site through other means, and WOMAN, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing to receive public input on the use of these fonds. HW$ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the $150,000 allocated for perk site acquisition in the North Town neighborhood is reprogrammed to park site development and staff is directed to trade aft information on this program change to the U.S. Department of Housing am Urban Development. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1980. ,TIN IV i C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October-1, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Lisa Nfninger, Assistant Planner h ww: N w • ,w SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ame ere o - reques o to 'LY' (4-8 du /ac) for 13.SScacres of land loafed on /the south side of Fero., east of Archibald - ADM 209- 055 -02, 03, 14. I• rer BACKGa ROUND: Staff has initiated a Development District Amendment Archibald. e located on the south side of Ferov Avenue, east of This request is one of the approvals required for the North Town park land donation process. General Plan Amen(k%ent 86-OIA for this site was a proved on April Residential ntialha(2 -4 du a) °tC Low iMedfua designation Re 1e,!ntlaten(4t8 du /ac) State law requires that the Development District designations be consistent with the General plan land use designations. Although a General Plan amendment has been granted, the site C. snot receive further approvals until the process has been issues which weere Development discussd District ro ardi Map has Gten amended. Amendment art described fully in the Attached e sttaffrareport. la druse Issues have been aresolved and noMS'.g lfica hearing issuessexist regarding the Development District Amendment. analysis far GPA 86-01 Prepared No significant environmental teimpacttshave been identified. Lim RA -� CITY CWNCIL STAFF FY )RT Development DistriccP�,wendoent 86.02 Page 2 II. PLANRING COIMISSION RECOW- NDATION: The Planning Canissfon roC00�en apprava o Issuance of a Negative ge�la�fon fstrlct Aeendeent 86,02 and concur, approval of the attached Ordinance Should be the City Council Respectfully submitt�edd. quired. Drai r Cfty Planner Attachments: Exhibit ^A' _ Vicinity Nap April 2, 1986 Staff Report Ordinance 0 e� Y :a q. I � off' �'l'l•� _, � y 7. MEDIUM CHO �:�..;}: j};�•,] y^ a ,r.ZENE R� OF �J PL TrrLE ExN!lit7ti "q •,?ix 4 8fL SCq�_� Chairman Stout advised snot hoard concurrently by the Cremi tsshe ton following items were related and would be , L. Lai Medium (q- g- r d"�ac) foel133.5 acres of of Feron, east of Archibald Avenue - APN e U, NORTH TOWN PARK OENSITT BONUS AGREEMENT 6U6AMUMM - A ow -—ac) to ted on the south side 03, 14. Lisa W1nl Di Assistant Planner, presented the staff report for the Presented Development District Mendsent. Bill No1, eY. Community Services Director Presented the North Town Park Density Bonus Agreement report Chairman Stout opened the public hearing, There were no public co ments, therefore the PuD 1c hearing was closed. Commissioner Coawissionma Barker stated times with requests lncreaoperty has been before the statements from the Co;vunity when asked 1f they realized 8 dwelling units acre could be ten with a density bonus, they had stated that they would thave to see +met the product looked like. He was concerned that there is. no hedCityawouldaget aI5 acrcsparli site, he was concerned with the Even though determine have tovwhether the pnrocedu Pa. rcs and safeguards it was the Commission's on any other parcel or product which comes before tCaaission9would still unitsptoethe acre still ivedtheaCit th enroan to work which nd eskeemsur�e tdhatltne product and the standards can be enforttd. As far as the density bonus agreement, he stated the only th1n9 the Comnifssfon could do is to make a recosendatfan to the Cfty Ceuncll. Ih stated that even though it killed him, he was inclined s byw the 20 units over the maximum in exchange for 5 acres of park as Song as he was assured somehow that the standards could be enforced to Insure a good product, Chairman Stout stated that he had voted against the density Increase every time it had,coma before the Commission , He advised that an Environmental Impact Repptt_Aad Dee" prepared for the site, which 1s remarkable given the size of tW,14Mel. The Environmental Impact Report Indicated that no more than 4 td's7umita should be constructed. He imitated that this proposal averugits *W� 14 acres is actually reducing the density to approximately 6 Der'acro. He stated this would decrease the amount of people and the service demand, which was one item the Environmental Impact Report Indicated ro critical due to the size of the streets. Further, that the drainage problem which has been a problem to the residents fora long time would be corrected, and a park would be provided, which is a much needed item for the residents in the area, s1 °Ilan to what was a He pointed out that the density is very Proved on 19th and Archibald, Which proved that an attractive project could De built at this density, He additionally stated that this project would still be subject to Design Review, and that the 'alb n , ta' , Committee would insist W the same design standards in this location as any other site in the City. -He was not Quite as reluctant to recommend approval as Commissioner Darker in that he felt this was a win -win situation for the City; it that it. was good for the area and good for the City. Commissioner Chitiea stated that the Commis -ion was told that the community is in agreement, but the Planning Commission was not Informed of any of the meetings which took place and felt it was unfortunate that no one from the comnonity was present to represent their feelings on the issue. She was uncomfortable with accepting a project for which there are no design parameters and not knowing lift the site plan would work or what the product 4' type would look like; therefore, had reservations about proposal but would support it because she felt it would be beneficial to that part of the community. Cotissioner McNiel stated that the City would still have levarage when the project comes back before Design Review• therefore, was not concerned with not seeing the product at this time. He po{nted out that typically people case to t th e Planning Commission meetingg are angry with a project; apparently, they attended the previous meetings and were satisfied with the proposal otherwise they would be here. Commissioner Rempel stated he had a great many reservations. The fact that there is no community representation this evening, was no rea: indication that they were happy with the proposal, just that they are beginning to give up. He felt the park should be integrated with the pproject; simply cutting off a ' portion of the parcel and making it a park with the remainder fatly high density housing it that area of City could have some serious problems. He thought a more creative use of the property could have been accomplished. Notion: Moved by Barker, seconded by McNiel, to recommend approval of Environmental Assessment and Development District Awnde nt 88-02 to the City Council. Notion carried by that following vote: AYES: ComisSIONEts BARKER, MCNIEL, CHITIFJI, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: HOES ABSENT: COMIISSIONERS: RENPEL - carriad 0 I • {{ T P:. . pf MN a F RESOLUTION N0. 86 -123 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING C0.''„lSSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT HO. 86-02 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM LOW TO LOW- MEDIUM FOB 13.55 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON, EAST OF ARCHIBALD - APR 209 -055- 02, 03, 14. WHEREAS. on the 15th day of July, 1985 an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of August, 1986, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65 California Goverment Code. 854 of the SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Co missfon has made v fo11aw1n9 n —i7 aings; 1. That the subjat property is suitable for the uses permitted css,, SI e�, a the nd Cmpatibilitytwith existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2• That the proposed district change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding Properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro oc wr not create A significant adverse impact on tha environment and recoanends issuance of A Negative Declaration on August 13, 1986. HON. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; 4r 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the Commission oGovernment the City of RanchoaGuethe Planning r<totre ^ds approval on the 13th day of August, 1986, Development District Auendm nt No. 86-02. 2. The Planning Cormtss ;on hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Development that Amendment No. 66 -02. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. PA APPROVED AND 4ZOPi'ED THIS 13th DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. PLA'aiNING CONIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOiiGA , B Y: f U�(Al 4' r- uenni�'�ci —r 3[10111 :9 C1iijj!jiiir ecre ATTEST -4ra u —1 • mu Bu er. epu yL~ --ry a Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the planning Co�ofssion of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was deity of regularly fntrnduced, passa:E the Ci City of Rancho Cucaeonga, ate and adopted by the Planning Y and on the 13th daffy of August, 1986. iy the /feting of the planr9 {� °� isston of the Y the following vote -to-wit7 o~ission held AYES; CDMIISSIONCRS: BARKER, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES: COMIISSIONERS: REHPEL ABSENT' C6M4ISSIONERS: HONE Y � == = ties. ��'.'L:_- _�sc[a.:. -__� ?� y� i r�• #•' ��f"- :.a:hVfi: ;: Yf.ki= .'{t.�fY: I�Y� }�4 j '�L 'e i C CITY OF RANCHO CUCA U;NGA STA" REPORT ct—r-Aa'Q DATE: August 13, 1986 $L4]'S a assn 70; Chaf i6 and Heabe FROM; rs of the Planning ConvatssL977 cn L977 Brad Buller, City Planner BT: Lisa Wfnfn er SUBJECT: 9 Assistant Plrnner E11Y1ROIN£117AL -- `CsYpt'EMT AFIENpyEhT 86-02 . eve omen is r c s a (2 4 da /ac 8 du /ao) for 13.65 acres ofla dLlocated on the s0 L side e Of Feron, east of Archibald APN 209 - 055 -02, 03. 14. BACKGROUND; Staff has initiated a Dev.lo South Archibald. This trequ sttls one of side a fpm et District ,A, North iown park land Avenue dsent donat(on process. P9rovals required for the 2. General Plan Amendment 86-OIA for this e 198G, changing the General Plan desl Residential (2 -4 du site was approved on esi n, State /acl to Lmi Medium 8natlon from Low Density esigaatfon$ be consistent requires Density Residential (¢8 designations, the Development District e Site cannot lrecelveafurtLe�1 pip ^he General plan land fie° completed and approvals has been granted se Amendoentes which we reeCfscedDistrict Natplhas p Process has However through�};f� fbed fully 1n theardtng the been amended . land use as General Plan ,yen attached Staffrarcpart; re!!h'dIng the peve10 bin resolved and no3n 9 ifl ng irocess, all Naent Dfstriet AknytnLi niff .all An Initial Study was Prepared in accord been for ed. 8G.01A. No significant been identified. ^dance with the enviro environmental i amend mpacts have The other item which will be discussed in A density bonus agreement. Director's Reports on relation site is this agenda his ltd will botpresented as 14 may, -1Z PLANNING COWISSION Srr77 REPORT •+ Development District Lndaent 86 -02 August 13, 1986 Page 2 II. RECOMMENDATION: Based ar. the approval of General plan Amendment r s a recaomendy approval of tie suosequent Development District Awndaent 86..02 and issuance of it Negative Declaration, Should the Planning Commission concur•, approv,11 of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council would be required. ' Respectfully subritted, v Brad Bu.'ler City Placnee Attachments: Exhibit 'A" - vicinity Nap Resolution of Approval u ,a h If.. e ORDINANCE 90. 299 AN OIDIDA9CC Of IRS CIST Cu=r OF TOE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMCICA. CdLI►ORNIA. 1g2O61EC ASSMOZ -8 PARCEL gOMgBR 209.055 -02, 03, 14 LCCAIND SOOTN SIDE OF ►EROR. FAST OF ARCHIBALD FROM "L" (2-4 DO /AC) TO "l.M" (4 -8 DO /AC) The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, dcas ordain as follws, NECTItAt 1, The City Council hereby finds and determines the L fellwing, A. That the Planning Comuiasion of the City of Rancho Cuctwoga, follwiag a public hearing bold in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the ru.,siny of the property bereindter described, a°d tb'.s City Council ha bald a public booting in t" Lae and stunner prescribed by law and duly award nrl co,•siderad said recommendation. B. That this running is convisteat vith the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rescuing will teas no significant environmental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTION 21 The following described real property is hereby rescued in the monaar stated, and the coning map is hereby amended accordingly. An Amendment to the Devslopweat District Map from R." (24 du /ac) to "LM" (4 -8 du /ac) for 13.5 acres of land, locrtcd on the south side of Verona east of Archibald Avenue - APR 209 -055 -02, 03, 14. SECTION 3, The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk @ball cause the same to be published vitbin fifteen (15) days After its passage at least once in 17S Dmily Retort, a newspaper of general circul -•ion published in the City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucawrgas California. PASSED. APPROVED. and ADOPTED this day of . 19e. i r k 1= CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: October 1, 1986 0 t�qi�, n Q S C T0: City Council and City Marager Z p FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer 1977 BY: Judy A. Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK !N CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATI0N N0. 28 FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -33 AND 85 -01 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 1 Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 28 to Landscape Itaintenancr. District No. 1 for Development Review 85 -33 and 85 -01. The Barmaklan Company and TAC Development Corporation, developers of OR 85 -33 and 85 -01 respectively. have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached •esolutinn also approves the Engineer's Report which was tentatively approved by Resolution No. 86 -262 on September 3, 1906. RECOMIENATION It is recommended work in a connectioCouncil ith approve Annexation P8etorLandscape Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. *1e5 fully su tted, LBH: :dlw Attachments s s_ CITY OF RAKCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for ANNEXATION NO. 28 to the Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 OR 85 -33 and OR 85 -01 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highway; Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex all new tracts into Landscape Maintenance District Ito. 1. The City Council has determined that the areas to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within DR 85 -33 and DR 85 -01 as well as on the lots directly abutting the landscaped areas. All landscaped areas to be maintained in the annexed tracts are shown on the Map as roadway right -of -way or easements to be granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscapin0 have been prepared by the developer and have been approved as part of the improvement plans for the developments. The plans and specifications for the landscaping are in conformance with the Planning Commission. Reference 1s hereby made to the subject developments and the assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscaped areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION <• Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for parkway improvement construction. All Improvements will be constructed by developers. Based on historical data, contract analysis and developed work standards, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will equal thirty (S.30) per square foot ver year. These casts are estimated only, actual assessment will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cast for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (including Annexation No. 28 comprised of 0 square feet of landscaped area) is shown below: 9.3 Total Annual Maintenance Cost S.30 X 14,376 square feet Per Unit Annual Assessment f94,312.80 $9-7 f,9,J. .312�.80 $9480 t 94 0 36 21.28 Per_ Monthly A�m_t $21.20 —1z 1.77 Assessment shall apply to each lot as enumerated in Section 6 and the attached Assessment Diagram. Where the development covered by this annexation Involves frontage along arterial or collector streets, which are designated for inclusion in the maintenance district but will be maintained by an active homeowners association, these assessments shall be reduced. SECTION 5. _Assessment t Diagram A copy of the proposed assessment diagram is attached to this report and labeled "Exhibit A', by this reference the diagram is hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for Annexation No. 20 is found to be of general benefit to all lots within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each parcel. Public In by0theto determine the previous fi,cal year which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the landscape and lighting Act of 1972. SECTION 7 D_der of Eve._�ts 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Report. Y Engineer s 3 City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to Annex to District and sets Public tearing date. a City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to Annex to the District or aband3n the proceedings. 5. Every year in May, the City °ngineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every Year In June, the City Council conducts a public approves, or modifies and approves the individual hearing and assessments. g i 9� RESOLUTION NO. TG -,;�*7 % A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION 110. 23 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 85 -33 AND 85 -01 NO. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 3rd day of September, 1986, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 86 -263 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 28 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 86 -263 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the Passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement °, was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -263, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailin or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copes were duly mailed in the time, farm, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intentlon No. 86 -263 be done and made; and SECTION 2: Be it further resolved that the report filed by the Engineer si— e wry finally approved; and SECTION 3: Be it further resolved that the assessments and method of assessment n tWe Engineer's Report are hereby approved. SECTION 4: Be it finally resolved that said assessments shall not begin unt a ter 0 percent of said tracts have been occupied. 9s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 1, 1986 TO: City Council aad City Manager Q c FROM: Lloyd D. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Judy A. Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION N0. 2 FOR TRACT NOS. 12832 AND 13022 TO STREET LIGHTING Mgjj1TEHANCE DISTRICT N0. 3 Attached fdr City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Anne.cation tic. 2 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3. The developers of the above proJects have been notified of the public hearing by mail. The attached resolution also approves the Engineers Report which was tentatively approved by Resolution No. 86_260 on September 3, 1986. REC0;11ENDATIWI It is recOmended that City Council approve the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Maintenance District 3. Annexation No. 2 to Street Lighting Respectfully submt d, i� LS dlw Attachments CITY•OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Repurt for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (v,ctoria Planned Community) Annexation No. 2 For Tracts 12832 and 13022 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is In compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit •A• into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on i per lot basis. In the case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as ap proved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development 1s hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. 9i _ SECTION 4, Estimated No costs will be incurred for street lighting All improvements will be constructed by developers 1s estimated that m intenance 0 lmpravement construction, Indicate d below, These coats are estimated only. Based on avallaLle data, based an actual cost data, assessment Purposes will fhe estimated actual assessments will as (including annexation Ho� cost for Lighting Maintenance and 504 5800E lights) is shown p is d of 1277 units and 6 g5 District OOL street NO I, S,C,E, Maintenance and Energy; tATP S1ze�� YTO s Lamps, 9500L Annexed 5800E 6 Rate 355 0 f10,16 "Nigh Pressure Sodium Vapor 148 893 Lag3s Rite Ft's Total 6 X 10,16 12 X 504 X 0.93 X 12 -- f 731.52 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: _97m7k, Total Annual Maintenance Cost No. o n s n sir ct S54._y740 76 . f42,86 f42,86 /Year /unit divided by 12 • f3.57 /mo. /unit Assessment shall apply to each 10c as explained in Section 6, SECTION 5 Assessment Dfa ram Copies of the propased Assessment Dfa r No. 3 Port and labeled -Street Lighting Maintenance District , These diagrams are hereby '�a�s are attached to this re Y incorporated within the tent of this r Nor . 2. SECTION 6. Assessment this report. dwelling units `or the District are found unit, g units within the District and that t0 be of ass essableeiandthere is more assessment general all be equalif to all to the n dwell {�sessmenthfor one dwelling or unit per lot equal parcel of umber of each lot each 9 units per lot or parcel Parcel shad be proportional District's Proposed that all future development shall be annexed to the n a is SECTION 1. Order of events 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex to District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and + determines to form a District•or abandon the ,iroceedings. S. Every year in Nay, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the ina'viduat assessments. 94? AN , EXHIBIT "A" P' Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 2 of Street Lighting Maintenance District 3: Annexation No. 2 Local TRACT DIU 5800L 12832 135 32 13022 280 117 415 149 oil Y D � X t' RESOLUTION NO. 8(0 -,)?O A RESOLUTION OF THE CITf COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION HI1H ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TP.ACT NOS. 12832 AND 13022 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamong lid on the 3rd day of September, 1986, adept Its Resolution of Intention No. 86 -261 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 2 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3, whinh Resolution of Intention Yo. 86 -261 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication o.° said Resolution of Intention on file In the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the p••vage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legsily posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Pc,ting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -261, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as aopears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the Jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to be derived there °ram and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTIOII 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho uc&wnTa that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said ResolL :on of Intention No. 85 -261 be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; and-- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment In the Engineer's oil— po�a•e hereby approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until tfter 60 percent of said tra�10-e been occupied. i� ■ CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA L� STAFF REPORT �' 0 DATE: October 1, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager 191 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Ludy A. Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNErT:ON WITH ANNEXATION NO. 16 FOR TRACT NOS. 12CO2, 12802 -1, niRU -6, 12673, 12319 -1 THRU -8, 12319, 12590, 12670, 12670 -1 THRU -4, 12832, 12833, 13022, 12642, 12935, 12937, 12940, 12941, 12942 AND PARCEL MAP 8617 Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 16 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The developers of the above projects have been notified of the public hearing by moil. The attached resolution also approves the Engineer's Report which was tentatively approved by Resolution No. 86 -258 on September 3, 1986. RECOMMENDATION It is reco7mnded that City Council approve the attached resolultiot. Ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 16 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the Engineer's Report. Resp ctfully subm ed, L/- 7VO4" LBIi: JAA: d lw Attachments r _r S k: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. 16 For Tracts 12802, 12802 -1 thru 6, 12673, 12319 -1 thru -8, 12319, 12590, 12670, 12070 -1 thru -4, 12832, 12833, 13022, 12642, 12935, 12937, 12940, 12941, 12942, and Ptrcel Map 8617 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to °A• into Street Lighting Maintenance determined that the street lights to all lots within sald tracts as well street lights. annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit District No. 1. The City Council has be maintained will have an effect upon as on the lots directly abutting the Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance 1s considered of general benefit to all „reas in the District and cost shai; oe divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condominiuns with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lignting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of tha subject area. /03 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs All 0e costs wfi) be aNrovem nts will be Incurred f construcr Street light +n It Is indicatedt below that maintenance developers. below, , Improvement construction. based on actual These costs are costs for assessaent on available data cost data, estimated onl Purposes The Y, actual assess will be as (includln estimated total menu will be I ights, 230 5800La11ohtso• d Ic for Ltgofingr Mun'tenance District No. 9 and IO,j�S�,L lights) 1s shown I. S.C•E• Maintenance and and 362 9500E street Energy: below: Lam S -ETP_Ize* Lamps 9500L YTO Annexed 5800L 262 mate 27 500L 230 100 3 7 $10.16 *High Pressure Sodium or 7 B.31 um Va 15.31 ' Vs Rate 362 X 10.16 —IS Total x 12 230 X 8.93 ° S0.135.04 X 12 10 X ;5.31 24,646.80 X Iz 837 20 as 2• Costs per dwelling Unit: ' Total Annual Mainten e' ° n is once Cost n str oct $70 619.04 �' S724A'ear Y 12 • ai 5.60 /o. /unit $7.24 divided b Assessment /unit shall apply to each lot as explained In Sect +en 6. SECTION 5. Assessment ofa ram Copies labele of the Proposed Assessment Di These diagrams are hereby Incorporated DistrgictsMO. "C.... porated lattAnned to this report and 6. mss wlthln the text of Cation No. 16. his report. dwaljln'ravement for the District unit, g units within the District are found unit. assessable Where there and that t0 be of general as the land, the asseor more one d assessment shall be benefit to all after of dwel11S each lolling unit per lot coral for 9 units per lot or shall be each Parcel. Parcel parcel al , proportional /6 SL Is proposed that all f•lture derelopments :hall be annexed to thN It Distri tt SECTION 7, Order Of nts 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2, City Council adopts Resolution of Prelimini y Approval oP City En�!neer's Report, 3. City Council adopts Resolution of public hearing date. Intention to annex to District and secs 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines to form a District or abardon the proceedings. S. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year to dune, the City ;,•ouncil conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the Individual assessments. f.. +e O �I EX11181T •A• Properties and inprovements to be included within Annexation No. 16 of Street Lighting Maintenance District 1. Annexati� on No 16 TRACT DAD 5800E 950GL Arterial 12802 12802 -1 12802 -2 12802 -3 221 12802 -4 1 ?802 -5 12802 -6 12673 397 12J19 12379 12319 -1 12319 -2 12319 -3 12319 -4 270 12319 -5 12319 -6 12319_7 12319 -8 12590 215 12670 12670 1 12670 -2 154 12670 -3 12670 -4 12832 135 12833 117 13022 280 12935 12937 12940 12941 227 12942 PM 8617 10 13 6 11 6 6 13 9 /D 6 2 2 3 i �c1 •4� RESOLUTION NO. b (p - a 2 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 16 TO STREET LIGHTING HAIH[TEHANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 12802, 12802 -1, THRU 6, 12673, 12319 -1 THRU -8, 12319, 12590, 12670, 12670 -1, THRU -4, 12832, 12833, 13022, 12642, 12935, 12937, 12940, 12941, 12942 AND PARCEL NAP 8617 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 3rd day of September, 1986, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 86 -259 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 16 to Street Lighting haintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 86 -259 was duly and legally published in the time, fora and manner as required by law, shorn by the Affidavit of Publication of sa'd Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after Ve adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and legally posted in the time, form, manner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution 'if Intention No. 66 -259, according to the names and addresses of such Orners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the rity of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Nailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefi'.s to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that tie public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that th,• work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -259, be done and made; and SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; na- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's elf post are hereby ,approved. SECTION 4: The assessments shall not begin until after 60 percent of said t7rac -Fav-e been occupied. Xo .% r Y I. ABSTRACT: The Developer is requesting the deletion of the Planning ono�ions condition requiring the payment of an in -lieu f!.,e as contributions to the future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Haven Avenue within the limits of the project. Staff is recormending that the City Council deny the appeal therefore upholding the Planning Commission's requirement. II BACKGROUND- The project was conditionally approved by the Planning loam ss on on August 27, 1986. The Developer's letter requesting ti.e deletion of the in -lieu fee requirement is attached as Exhibit `A'. The project consists of an office building and related parking lot as shown on Exhibit •C° (detailed Site Plan). The Haven Avenue improvements fronting the project are existing except for a new driveway approach which was requested by the Developer. Existing overhead utilities are located or. both sides of Haven Avenue fronting the site. Cable TV, 66KV and 12KV electr!cal lines are located on the project side, telephone lines (only) are located on the opposite side of Haven. Exhibit 00" cwitains photos of the utilities. III. ANALYSIS: It is the intent of the Planning Commission that all projects contribute to the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities fronting the site either by causing the lines to be und!rgrounded immediately or paying a fee to offset the cost of future undergrounding. In this case the Commission opted for a fee, FM 1 �. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r arm STAFF REPORT r c o B GATE: October 1, 1986 i TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council SUBJECT: Appeal of Development Review 86 -14 - Haven Avenue Investors DATE: October 1, 1986 Page 2 because the length of the frontage (245 feet) was to short to be undergrounded economically. The requirement to pay in :ieu fees as contributions to the future undergroundtng of existing overhead utilities is consistant with current Planning Commission Policy, which is contained in their Resolution attached as Exhibit 'E". Subsections '.b., 3, 4, and 6 apply to this project. The amount of the fee for this project in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 86 -143 (Exhibit •F ") would be $80 per linear foot times 245 feet of frontage equals $19,600. Haven Avenue is one of the most important streets within the City, therefore it is considered especially important that existing overhead utilities along its frontage be undergrounded. The property immeeiately to opposite of Haven afuture opportunity for additional fee payments or actual undergrounding to occur in the immediate area. Staff has been irking with the Chamber Economic Development Committee on the issue of undergroundtng overhead utilities. The requirement that to -lieu fees be paid by developmeits is consistant with their preliminary discussions. The Developer has stated that he feels the requirement to pay the in -lieu fee for undergroundin0 for his project is unfair because it was his understanding that all requirements for improvements along Haven Avenue had previously been completed. A similar argument could be made for many of the projects that the Planning Commission has rec_ntly approved subjcct to these requirements. The undergroundtng policy has only been in place since October 1985 (the detailed resolution was adopted May 28, 1986). /09 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council SUBJECT: Appeal of Development Review 86 -14 - Haven Avenue Investors DATE: October 1, 1986 Page 3 Iv: RECOMMENDATION- Staff rec=nends that the City Council uphold the Conditions of Approval for Development Review 86 -14 and deny the appeal request. +Respetfully zuWnt ted , Attachments: Exhibit: Descriptor: "A' Letter of '8' Location Map Request from the Applicant 'C' Detailed Site Plan 'D' Photo of Utilities "E' Undergrounding Policy Resolution "F" In -lieu Fee Amount Resolution Minutes 4' a� tructl j 736en Investors I Rancho eC�caM0- nue September 3, 1986 CIt city Y Clark Cucamonga P'0' lark 807 C. Rancho m Dao Lino Road C�can9a, Ca11f. I Pmen t coy PRCCC 91730 °G4Nho'ro vC�\ 441 Selp o 187914 //r�rl'i3Qb pi/ rSs Re: Have 91730 n Professional Cs-,ter DR 86 -14 Dear Attn: erly= Y Authelet City Clerk lie Of Englneerin " -u'2request DR 86 -14 as ag Cond tio /2 an aPPeal to 27th. 1986. PProved by the of Conditions of Achy Council, al for f Met all COndjtI or 0urd6e rou Condition 49reem nut require swthat a �intherPcor"�itions. Meat on Haven Avenue Ong andscoMplet Planned on pus. 0n Av Huse bltPaid e feel Park had Is unfair l� enil ecausef Master Planneda��10na1Ppee-aeons deve sincerely, economic hardp enlour Pro - v�ce " J Carman President JC /bc 7365 Hellman Avenue .e , �f t t ; CITY OF RANCIj ° = u A"I"i'S R'T��'OfrWl AV SEP 04 1986 Rancho Cucamonga. California 91730 (719!987.7788 /t �R / H,017 A- y, U'TILl2AyfON ""1`t-�nU CUCAMONGA �rrGr�ING m„rm.,,. Cn T OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EAiGII EMMG DWWON // 3 ME EXISTING F RISTING ITEM:_ DR 8� -iy N Tana DETAILED rE p--I�_ w G SIT:_ WES751 DE OF HAVEN LOOK I N G NORTH E AS I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I:4 t i r:N" Ik t -5.. EASTSIDE OF HAVEN LOOKING NORTH TV RESOLUT -ON N0, 86 -77 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMAISSIOH OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCPMOIIGA ESTAMISHING A POLICY FOR THE UNDERGROUNDIN9 OF EXISTING OvERHEA7 UTILITIES. wishes to remove 6uns ghtlyaexistf g Commission ad utility linesoin order otoupromote a more aesthetic and desfraF'e working and living environment within the City; and WHEREAS. it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property owners and developers of the CJV goal. !evelopments. unless sp0eci'fically waived sbyvthe Planning Commission, shall all responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines lncluaing the removal of the related supporting poles adjacent development as follows; to the limits of a 1. Lines on the project side at the street *: a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the developer's expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as a short longth of undergrounding (less than 300 feet an7 not undergroundad adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvement ^, etc., the Developer -hall pay an in -lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one- half the cost of undergrounding 'rom future ievelopments as they occur on the opposit: side of the street. 2. Lines on the o poslte side of the street Prom the roject: The eve open s ra pay a ee LTie y ar one- a e amount M Section 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street• The Developor shall comply w ect on a ove an o e i�yle for relmhursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one -half the total cost of undergroundfng the lines on both sides of the street 4. Pole lines containing 66KV or larger electrical lines: All Ines s a e un ergroundra or in lieu tees pa n accordance with Sections 1. 2 or 3, above, except for 66 XV or larger electrical lines. DR 8b -i�1 ��s ExH 31T "E" S• Limits of Responsibitit�es; a• toe lieu lees; The -ee shall be based upon the length pro property being developed from property line er Pro]road sore channel the cright- or- wdy(aceetcstreets l for (alley, es. railroad channel corner b• Undergounding: Undergrounding shall extend to; first existing Pole off -site boundaries, (2) d new from the (11 the or across the street (alley. at a PrOJect Of-way , etch for corner y. railroad, or chant boundary y Dole within 5 Properties, channel rlght- corner), feet of a project boundary an existing Y foot at d 6• Fee Amount: The amount for Tn -lieu fees shall equal the er ec ion S.a) times the unit, nit amount as established D • ty Council based upon information supplied length a companies and as updated porfadtcalT pplied by the utility ' Ali references y as deemed necessary. channel rights - oaf-- watreets shall also mean dl +. Y, etc. !s, railroad or APPROVED AND ADOPTED i PL HIS 11TH PAY OF MAY, 1986. Ah7 1 ISSIO. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40NGA N / " t BY: av, r er, ce Zia rswn� ATTEST: ra u er, eputy ecre ary 1, Brad Buller, Deputy Rancho Gateman a e Secretary ciy that the planning City of " regularly introduced passed 8 Commission of City Of Rancho cucamon a . and adopted 9 R_solutfon was duly and on the y of May. regular Pted D9 the p, Commission of the Y the following tanning Comlmissien held 9 votehe PI t: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: MCNIEL. CHITtEA, BARKER, RFFIPEL COM4iSSIOf1ER5: NONE ABSENT: COMHISSIONERs: sravr Ilk T lENOLO{1W ■o. b.IaT A 1ENCLMW Or TTC CTTT CWSCM CT Tea Cln cN ■A1CSD CDCAIIWCA. CALMAXIA. ENTULla■ENC ygn EN LIP Cr DrDCClCCtOEND Mg..... OTTLITT LENU Vm RASat■C COMISSIW ""MAL ■Olc1 ■P tr .■ENW. the [14.4161 Cvudwas red City too. it of the CIA of Searle Coca'"' "'b" w -treat the .,.1 at ...1[bt, ni.cin ....head 1. .fluty lieu 1. .,do, to pnn.• • tor. ...ebtle had de.lr.bb "min ." 4 Cart.[ "Ito -to-t -tWi. 16. City, ." -mw, tb city Cavern e""a/ut that at I. ucnuA to ve"q Ah gthedr to N.I Wt, .h or .... tad to or ...pilau •"er[cov "ly le ASr eoer eaat at erctl.. roam W a vmw, the City Cwatll e" 11.edq C..duiev farther 'ea ... in that 1. rarblA car". it 1. /grecelcat to rNVio dre.lerea.t to Wegrsv.d .tilltln rare that 1• arch Caro. rea. A 11.., of ea4rtto.ed(.[ should r aWatltab tee aebal roge,reetfae. r lueh. Cvet..I.. C.11fer.i.T thott be.. Tthe cb. City ,oddjI of at eraly Ceviw..L- rare,... "Twat of toe !u 1111 at -Note. "iy. the tea .bait be eL. P#fgr,eo, c - .Maul.. at the fell. tat. 1. At at,rLc&I 144o - Sloo ..r Itlor teat. T. Wert ... Lt... - aW par it foot. T Cabl• T.T. - 310 por, data. Tae,. the ter .0.11 Narl the yards at. total target On llvot toot of each It'llty oar -ALt the vtUlty polar. [LISP. AYVIMM. add ADOITP t 1 Tot doe of Nty. ISU. Amt S-Ca-t, 91.1. Debt. rtl It P� can, ter. ASSENT, Whole P or ATM?. ,,,D� , aerarly A A.We1N. City Gist TI IUMT A. AS=11t. CITY CLEU of the City at &."%a Cartoons, Crlll.r.la, do barrel, ... tdty that the fornel.t .Delon.. .o dell, pea. ". tDrrer". •" adopt" by the CIt- Coo.it at car City It 4atho catoN[a. C.tlbrut.. at a rq.l.r .,Daln of aid city Ce11tll hale ae the ILt dap at 1.61, 1Ta6. - , DR $ b- H X17 EXHIBIT ° F" I bul.cie. No. N -I42 2.C. 2 48guua tht. 22.4 day at 142, 1984 at ,oche C.C.u.p. C41/2orol.. 9.e..22 •.[belt. CLy C2..h r H9 I If C S - GRAFT EXCERPT i - - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 27, 1986 FOR DISCUSSION i FDRpiiSES NEW BUSINESS r H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86 -14 - HAVEN AVENUE The eve apaKn o one square o0 o ce u rg on r0D5 acFes of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 7), located Center Drive - APH 2H�153 -1T nand 13. (Continued from August 13, Civic 3986 meeting.) Debra Meier, Assistant Pltnner, presented the staff report. • Chairman Stout asked if this project has adequate on -site parking. Ms. Meier advised that the project has on -site parking and the applicant 1s trying to initiate sharing four to seven spaces with parcel 4. Chairman Stout asked if the Commission could act on this project without the parking situation being resolved. Ms. Meier advised that staff was provided with a copy of a paring agreement sig, d by both parties. Commissioner McHiel suggested that the agreement be reviewed as a condition of ., approval Chairman Stout invited public comment Sunny Mascarenas, project architect, offered to address any building design concerns. There were no comments relative to the design. Joe Carmen, 7365 Hellman, Rancho Cucamonga, advised tha• a signed and recorded reciprocal parking agreement was in existence for this parcel. Chairman Stout asked if a lot line adjustment to get four more spaces would be more advantageous than a parking agreement Mr Carmen replied that the parcels were changing ownership so he did not see tow a lot line adjustment could be o,,tained. Mr. Carmen additionally objected condition driveway atthe north rpoperty line. a Heg stated nthatkthe estreetgishextrapWide at that location and did not see the need for the pocket since it would reduce to amount of requirement foriunderg ounding out overhead utilitiesaoil HavenlAvenue�tHe ,• advised property, and felt placinggthatulkindeofpfeexo�n al one0acrefsitee created an extreme hardship. Planning Commission Minutes August 21, 1986 r �� 9 There were no further public comments. Commissioner Barker asked the Engineering Department to address the right turn Pocket issue. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, advised that this was a condition placed on the project by the Traffic Engineer, who was unable to attend this meeting. Mr. Hanson stated he could not address issue except that the it was needed to get the people out of a possible north -south lane. He further stated that he was not alt-are of a natural widening of Haven at the location of this site. Chalrmiarr Stout stated that a right turn pocket begins approximately in this area for CIVIC Center Drive. He stated that this driveway has the same problem as the one in Barton Plaza I in that the driveway is in the center of the transition where it widens out into the pocket and makes it difficult to negotiate a turn. He asked for discussion regarding the utility Issue. Commissioner McHfel stated that a determination was made a long time ago to attempt to underground utilities in the City. He was of the opinion that the Commission has to maintain a posture that utilities must be undergrounded or an in -lieu fee re aired, otherwise the undergrounding will never be wouldpeventuallyRhavedto behInstalledoat the concern was e, that the pakets Chairman Stout stated that there Is a certain point where the major streets obviously need turn pockets, but if turn pockets are required for every small drive, there mould be 50 of them. He felt the amount of traffic turning in the driveway would probably not be that great. Brad Buller, City Planner, advised that without to Traffic Engineer being at the meeting to discuss the issue, the Commission might want to continue the item to the next meeting, or modify the language to read this condition may be whether the Commission feiltt that alaof the amount of landscaping and the impact that it makes is significant. Chairman Stout asked if there should be a driveway there or not. Commissioner Chitlea stated that this issue was discussed Design Review and the driveway was determined to be necessary for the adjacent parcel to the north. She felt It might create more traffic problems for the center if the driveway was deleted. Commissfone� Barker wanted some kind of reasonatle radius to allow people to enter the driveway without having to be creative in their driving he allow a he was locking for some sort of radius that would be a compromise to at leas safe ingress and egress from Haven. Planning Commission Minutes _g_ August 27, 1986 /ao Corafssfone stated tOner Chi e is drIV&woy Was ht h Ivant to this Cneces a y °�h oP the Pro Or, in major See entry edscapfn9 e) nece ms tf.0 a did not fep�j u]dn•thbece�n hr eliminated She the Cit ty forNaNfe) oration lot the he the decetaration' ianie enterin Brad Buller s expense. N s p feockets att of Probl Mould be had been , Ity Pianner sore was tho)tuer date in that he co Xotton, aced on some prevfousl that this Pocket, UP and doiM Have the soluif right harm' PProvin Barker to ly aPProv pronditi to re n at Weds on i the d turn 9 0eveio issue Projects on Haven. turn City Planners' and a with the Bevfew 8�e9a:ive p Pockets radius to N ^ES•:Po11owtn9 vCONl1 S ONorney reciprocal M tfon9y _Semendthat�wht �ons c del Pt the athe ABSENT. COVIISSI0NERSS BARKER CNIrtEA hitfea and con d !hy Sr MCleEt OOr coftfs ressaroner McN a llSSIONERS; NONE tale that • vote - carried n the s e future and t cfhave to bewfnstalied et the pockets wo CityIs exP 1 se. Planning Commission Minutes -10- Ae9nst 27, 1986 +v APFIDAVIT Of PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO es I, Linda Parisian do hereby ceitlf am I egal Ad<ertisln8 Clark of THE DAR,Y REPORT, i that I newspaper of general a(mdatlon, &:bushed in the Qty of Ontario County and State aforesaid and that the attached advertisement of Notice of Public Hearing for Rancho r Cucamonga DC 372 Was pubiishedIn raid newspaper One t1f time to wit; Sevtam6er 19, 1906 3 room y under penalty oP perjury flat the foregoing V true and eW l Dated at OntarH NIifonda this 19Atnature) day of Sept. 06 Ir r=. f - � i ea -I CITY Op RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 1 9L , 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM; Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Debra Hefer, Assistant Planner SUBJECT; APPEAL�L OF PLAIVIING CIISSION DECISION ENVIRMIENTAL — — RECOFKNDATION; Deny the appeal ePPr°va a onditfonal Use Pit 86-12. uphold the Planning C°mmisslon BACKGROUND: The applicant has aPPealcd the Planning Fc son or Conditional Use Permit sP= clfically appealing a condition Commission's Conditional Use Pe 85-12. The op i91t. that being ConditionpNo�al2.1m�P; sad on thi; parking or storage of lease vehicles and /or trailers associated with use shall be pr'°hi6ltedO. The overnight The Planning Commfssicn, at its meeting of Jul review9 and the i pCondlftui� 1 Use Permit July' 1986' Public determined the input held a that the proposed ConditlonallUse Permi � stmt with the City's General Plan and the current Industrial Planning Cor4nission During the Public hearin Specific Plan, lease cvehicien or The Conditfonals Use Permit that °vern! ht the Coamissfon consider thfs condition ,,,associated trailers be prohfbtted. The Parking of leased of other businessesavoid another f; the Pup ose o leaving of vehicles as well within Pect of parkin at a time. There as trail d- i oeenter. SpeciftcallY, the the usage ofra max, 'ere On ospace. Althourb there is I Condiltiondvevehlejes easily enfcrceatjeution to thesprob emta.Rt't ne time regarding Whereas not �a solution not seen overnfg t for soveral da s !t would 6e evident if vehicles that is Y at a tine, were left /� a CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ' Appeal: CUP 06_12 Western Services Company October 1, 1986 _ StaffhReport which outlines and consideration Aso attached afsiagcopoy ofsthe Planning Commission Resolution of Approval with Conditions and minutes In of the meeting of July 23, 1986. a. RCSQP ly SYbeftted, b C/ K /Brad Buller i MY Planner S l B8:OM:ns Attachments: Appeal Letter from Applicant Planning COMfS$Ion Staff Report, July 23, 1986 Planning CemafSSion Resolution of Approval with Conditions 11anning Commission Minutes, July 23, 1986 S r "r (714) 945 -9712 (800) 325 -5682 We3ku AW8 2eaeixg • CorP, Office • 9375 Archibald Ave. Ste. 106. Rancho Cucamonga. cA n1730 08/01/86 City of Rancho Cucamonga Office of the City Cler; P 0 Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Dear Ms. Beverly Authelet ANCHO CUCAAI CRY OF R OKOA ADMINISTRATION l:l!G 04 1986 7t8t t�f1+?iSAM A As a results of the July 23 Public hearing before the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, resolution 36 -103, conditional use permit 86 -12, we, co Westncerern -'g v1ci"„ Company, take eacoPtion to section 3 Paragraph 2 ning overnight parking. While the Planning Commission saw fit to approve our conditional use Pennit, < -action 3, Paragraph 2, '_.ovarnfgbt parking or storage of !ease vehicles. .shall be prohibited-, severely limits our ability to conduct business in a normal manner Further Is creates an addition burden by forcing us to find another suitable, soured area for overnight parking. We would like to exercise our right to appeal this condition by having you place this matter on the city council calendar for their consideration. i have enclosed Lye necessary fees in connection with this appeal. Upon confirmation of a hearing date , Please provide notification so that I may adecuately address this I,,ue before the city, council. Very truly yours, Spencer L. Brown /6 Vice President, Finance The C ARMAkIAN- ny r.I Augeat 0, 1986 Rancho Cucamonga C1 t� council 9320 Baaellna Road s P.O. Box 807 r Rancho Coca i moaga, CA 9170 A y; C =Isar Cou.ncllz The owner• of the office park at 9775 Archlcentat have po objection plop 1° the Parking to 4a Archibald knowe u B lop ■I tar basinasa hour'. Auto Laaaleg Parking Ve feel It 8 ears alter t• adyaatdo so ea to hATS the vahte"s burglaries working hours due to the fact that [zom Parked !a the to Thank you for _aktag Place Sp this offloa park help to prevent t If your coopste tlon to this ■stter. aarilaatae oo aenl aacatfons Plassa feat •sea to contact us at your Sincerely. s, 1 .r r T 3 y,. DJT6ARCN10.�1� AVENUE :;• .GeV @!O m SUITE 101 P o ^t BroAera 9 e �N'NU r'AIUNUA Properly management .• , CALIFORNIA y, TO@ •Traver)eenr ArchnecR,re - ,� En m 9 � '> �S DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT CITY OF RANCHO CUCCONGA STAFF REPORT July 23, 1986 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City planner Debra Meter, Assistant Planner ENVVIIR,OONNMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 66-12 au a ems n9 o ce and a es , vmen o an offices, 1n an existing building, general a lease space square feet on 1.66 dcras of land to the General Industrial District (Subarea 4) locatad ai 9375 Archibald Avenue - APN 210- 071 -47. I PROJECT AND SITE DCSCRIPTION: A. ACLien Re uested: ssuance o A egative Declaration. Conditional Use Permit Ind 8. Surroundin Land Use and Zan1n or r South - *. ndustrial Park; ISP Subarea 4 East - Industrial; ISP Subarea 4 Nest - Vineyard; ISP Subarea 16 C. General Plan Oesf nations: r ec e - enera n ustrtal Nor,n _ General Industrial South - General Industrial East - General Industrial Nest - Industrial Park D• Site Characteristics: The site 1s an existing Industrial us ness approximatelyrp3,000 square feeLUOfibuild;settince, containing 1s fu setting improved and landscaped and 96 standard size parking The site spaces are available on site. E. A iicable Re ulattons: The proposed use 1s classified as n s ra va . ce rrhlch is a conditionally permitted use in Subarea 4, *` /�� ITEM L PUNNING CO3%4 B ZeSSIDI l lip STAFF ,1986r` Services Page 2 pany r II. IWAL;SI�; A. pG�nerpal- wl Th uta Pl cr0tuiis currently operatln9 frog the business at this IocatlonQConsistsnoftlonal administrative Use Permit. The Western ervfces Including. locating and obtat0fng flnanrn of repairs of mobile homes, and the andai elu at'. Contracting for guard and patrol service. They have about - :0 Security sa the office at any one time and operate from 8:00 p, m, The vehicles far lease arc Storage Yard located at 8for Vineyard Avenue. g.00 a m. until stored at Vineyard Nest The applicant was aware of the roqufreioent for Conditional Use issue involving code enforcement January n other or. I businesses and their customers were It became an stored on_ The problem was the presultgo0 an on -site parking more than sthe' This meant that Western Servicesvvarcutitizing They are allotted percentage of Parking spaces allowed to them. on -site spaces, Thosepspncesaareifor5use S b ft') the use of 15 and any accessory vehicles brought to the shay e, clients purposes• the parkin y em l° eas, and they have a g Dr °blew was brought to their attention alleviated the PParently worked out a solution that has this Conditional UsepermAitreis� ended condition of a the allotted 15 on -site parkin that at no time shalIPmoreathan of this business. 9 spaces be utilized b III FACTS FOR Y the users enera FINDINGS: The proposed use 1s In accordance with pur oses of the Industriajlvos 0f the Development Cooe, and the Is located as evidenced b Specific Plan Subarea in which �ha adalnistrative and office uses Conditional Use Permit the site together with the rec°msended Conditions Subarea ' Provision fo; detrimental to the , The prolp0)sed use I us nJurfous to proper tieslorhimprov�ents or welfare ' materiaile IndustrfaliSsecifIC beach of the aPPticablee area. p The proposed .an. provisions of the IV CORRESPONDENCE: this flea has been advertised as a to a e a e art newspaper, toe Property Posted and proper y owners within 300 feet of Public hearing notices sent the project, " PUNNING COMISSIO1f^TAFP REPORT CUP 86 -12 - Nester ervtces Company Page 3 1986 9. RssueMa�eya�ve Declaration oration an recommends that the Planning Camission 12 through adoption of the Pprove Codditional Use Permit 86- Approval, attached Resolution and Conditions of Respectfully submitted, Bra' Puller City Plonner BB:ON:ns Attachments: Applicant's Letter Exhibit 'A• - Location 11ap Exhibit "B• - Site Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions r b` a I40A.1 _ 200 4c I VL • 5 or. 2 Qti Pur, 3 i 1' O Z9941- 491at e.gaC �3 I, ~lt A w v wr •' a Pcc 3 }'f Aff • R/, Pcr. l ZY . 4.23AC ynyi �+m 5.31 Ac. j M.� **p v,• 1 S POC 2 i E9 7.36 n � Pa. 3 's6 ffis tf.� R .°, 4Q a P.29 9 _ I 3.33 AC' `S1 ' tE . ;K .< •r ® Ca+ ' Avg C Ze a• 6 5 E , 2] BK 1 A�si ful a 3622 ACM /L I ^��f 9sc• �y--�� a i I +nm i r n 9s— 16 yAn 119 9 AC I y J9 R r9AC �} W P _ ' 35 001.36.20 R. F.5 29 3 or 1 f`A2�20K� 1 0, SAN BERNARDINO qny jr CITY OF �`'oxn r RANrcF irk CU Wa,,T 47"p, 'PLkMU9G DIViSEOIV FJCfilBiil Iy�n ,r .r EA t' �,(;�.'.� 1111111•.;; •w.. 111 �� �i�J ~,.1,.,111 .. -• •• �• 1 ri •� 1711 1'r'I1111 ���• yl l •w.. ,',111 • � ' i"- ---.., '11 .�77 17 4.1 X1111111 t` 4 1TY OF PLA1v <TCrr�l,J S)CN \' 77jYt ` . >XNIm•r r�orr H RESOLUTION N0, 86 -109 APPROVING RESOLUTION CONDITIONAL USE ERmi CICAIONGA o pLAHpING CO.kgISSIDH SERVICES COMPANY LOCATED SE PERM! N0. 86-12 FOR NCSTERN INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC 0I S7RICi AT 9375 ARCHt ^•'0 AVENUE IN THE r. filed b Nester;, on the 25th day Of eVf, 1986, a c application was and Wester;- Services C of the complete a above- descrlued project., EAS, on the y of July, 1986 C�1sslan E" a 23rd da public hearing to consider the the Rancho Cccamonga planning t1 descrfbe, project. A Y, THEREFORE, tf►3 Rancho follows: NO r Cucaaon <ur Planning Cucmission resolved as SECTION _ 1: That the following findings can be met: I• That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan' the objectives of tl.• O°velopment Code, and the located Poses of the of !n which the site is 2 That tR�se d use, together with the conditions Public health will not be dotrimenidl to the Injurious to �proD� properties orwelfare, or materially vicinity, improvements in they 3• Tha aDDt the Proposed use ies licable provisions of oles compl with each of the Development Code, environmentt'�° That this project Mil not create adverse Impacts on the �7iTfat t Negrtive Declaration Is issued on July 23, 1986. sub„ect S4TION 3: That Conditional Use permit t1C ° ow'ng conditions: No. 86_12 1s approved I parking of employees, clients or accessory vehicles brought on site for any reason, shall not use more than a total of 15 .v Parking spaces at any one time, ��'`„__�— `�f' -,• k..',- 1.2= rte.`'_ e 11 Page 2tf on No. Page 2 C 2. The overnight park'ng or storage of lease vehicles and /or trailers associated with use shat t° prohibited. 3. This approval 1s of Office- Administrative uses only. Additional use expansion to include a security uard patrol company will require separate consideration by the Cooadssion. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22RO DAY OF JULY, 1906. PLANN G COMMISSION OF 'HE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r+ in ATTEST: �ru a I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of tha City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution Has duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by vhe Planning commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular m:eting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of Ju)y, 1986, by the following vote- to.vtt: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEII, CUIEL, REMPEL, STOUT NOES: COFPiISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER e �rt 3,3 :, t L. Of land. in • ain9' with a lease Archibald - aou , Genera _Industr eas n o "ss1ER! feet gon cel—r" ar� 4) located at acres Debra Mater, Assistant Planner 9375 additfcnal condition be ' revlowed the staff re Parking of lease vehicles P1ace,i on the Dort. Staff suggested Or asao,;;a Lld trailers.on prohibitfn ve al, Chairman Stout opened the 3 the overnight there were no publi; Comments, the hearing. The applicant was not Chai refore the public hearing was clos esent and Chairman Stout was Use permit was als might Oet the lmpresston that Approval of p guard control co:apanY He suggested that an additional the Resolution stating that this a an a proval of the security uses only and that additional pproval was condition be added to co,r5lAeratiOn by the use for the condition staff's expansion would adainlstrative liked had er DA11ean issfon, He stated he did n tyhave aaprobleia the applicant have the a to prohibit He stn had been notified of resent ri discuss this issue. however, would Ms. Meter thu hearing, issue. He asked if with them Prior to otthIs no a licant had bee Commissioner Chtt/ea n notified and that she had spoken recently, asked If there were any parking conplalnts recafved an Meier advised that staff had contacted o applicant there that since the ro p Cher tenants within tnls project there had been no further parkin Derty Owner had s Notion: Moved 6 9 Problems, Poken with the and adopt the Y Chitfoa, seconded by Nellie), o issue a Use Permit 86- Resolution approving Environmental Negative Declaration Use permit 12, ,it, en added condition stated that approval and expansion 86 12 1s for the office - administrative Dpr °val of Conditional prohibiting the use to Include the security y and °thatl oanl canted b 9 °vernfght parkin Y partrol Omp Only Y the fallowing vote: 9 of lease vehicles an and a condition AYES; for trailers, Motion COMISSIONERS CHITIEA, MCNIEL, REMpEL, SiOUi NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: NONE COMMISSIONERS: BARKER -cL rr led . Planning Comnfsston Minutes � I W2 July 23, 1906 .r'V , SrATZop �UNTYUFAl,1t1YlA �MfDAVITO!►t/ILICAT1` .iAN 1, l tnua BERN'�DYO � ss 1'nrlaian l Jim 'he Legal &,:UntNtr Of and Stiteey°dnrnlatlokn� THE D Yjpt)�Y that l Of Notice Of 'a rrsald and t /'ob11C )1#4 attached attacheQdra t Cuca_ a` 2 tom` DC 3T Was PUbILlhedlnfiWdnaa.V#Mron (1) tta� towlt: 540t ember 19, 19813 1 ��' ender cotrMt t>enallY of Per/Lry 't +at the forego 4 trite and Dated at ontatlo, Gll(oin/as� 19tuhae) ��� Seat. daYof L:l ORDINANCE 90. 300 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOMCA. CALIFORNIA, SECTION 10.20.010 AND SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMCMCA, CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS A. StaciUll (i) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 provides that this City Council ray, by ordicanca, sat prima facie speed limits upon any portion of any street not a star,, highway. (ii) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted ea engineering and traffic survey es of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which streets are specified in Part E of Vila Ordinanco. (iii) She determinations concerning prima facia speed limits not forth in Part B. below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey identified in Section A (it), above. B. OrdiREnaa NON, THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OP SHE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONCA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS, Section 10.20.010 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamouga City Code to reed, in words and figures, as follwat 10.20.010 Ieeraeainr state opted tiy(t In_eertain tongs. It is determined by City Council resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state law upon the follwiug streets is leas than is necessary for safe operation of vehicles thereon by reason of the designation and signpostLus of the streets an through highways and (or) by reason of widely spaced intersections, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be set forth in this section on those streets or parts of street, designated in this section when sigos are erected giving notice thereof, /15A Declared Prim Facie KLrA of Brrw,Ltyt portion Affected $oeed_LIMIr (MPH) 1. Amethyst SLrect -- Baseline to and 35 2. Buryl Street-- Baarline to 800' north of Lames Avenue 40 3. Ninth Street --Crove to Baker 35 4. Rell.tan Avenue —Alta Loma Drive to 500' a.rtL of Mamanita Drive 35 5. frrov 2oute —Ctcva to Baker 45 6. Sapphire Street--Loma to Banyan 40 1. Vineyard Avenue -- Carnelian to Church 40 8, Lomas Avonua— FootbLll Blvd. to 19th Street 35 /15A (Ord. 169 61(part), 19821 (rd. 39B 81, 19801 Ord. 49 85.0. 1978). (i) The twenty -five (25) miles per hour speed does not facilitate the orderly movemsat of vehicular traffic. (ii) The Kilos per hour to stated are the prima facie speeds which are coat appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable sui safe on said streets or portions thereof. (iii) The miles per hour stated are beraby declared to be the prim facie speed limits on said strvots. (1v) The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorised and directed to install appropriate Bigot upoc said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared heroic. SECTI:EI 21 Section 10.20.020 hereby is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City Code to read, in words and figures, as follows In.2n.026 D cr�a_ It is determined by City Courril resolution and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that the speed permitted by state lm if gretter tbt -a is reasonable or safe under the eonditiens found to grist upon such streets, and it is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be as sat forth in this section an those streets •r parts of streets designated in this section wbea signs are erected givLog notice bereoft 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. S. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Archibald Avenue-- Yourtb St,set to Banyan Street Arrow Route--Baker to Haven Haven Aveuue-- Higbland to Nilson Hellman ivenue— foothill to Alta Lou Drice Hellman Avanue --6th to Yootbill Hellman Avanue- -500' north of Nannanita to Valley Vito Beryl Stroet- -800' north of Leona to gaoyan Beryl Street -- Banyan to and Base Line Road —taut city limit to Caroelian Base Line Road -- Carnelian to Haven Carnelian Street-- Yootbill to cad Eighth Street- -Crove to Haven Etivands Aver,.--Foothill to Highland Highland Av, nun-- laethyst to Archibald Grove Avet .0 - -Blgh •h to Foothill rt /37 Declared Prima facie BRggdJdKit (MPs) 45 45 50 35 45 40 40 45 45 4(. 45 45 45 35 40 16. Turner Avenua--Sdgbth to foothill 45 17. Suppbite Street --19th to Lawn 40 18. Sapphire Street - -Banyan to and 45 19. Vineyard Avanna-- Cbureb to Boat Line 40 20. vbittram Avenuo--Btivands to east city limits 40 21. Victoria Park Lane 35 22. Banyan Street —from vest city limits to 400' 40 cast of Archibald 23. dlllside Road —from Reach Gate to AmstByst St. 35 24. Church street --from Archibald Avenue to 40 seven Avenue 25. San Bernardino Rod —from VLoeyaod Avenue to 35 Archibald Avenue 26. Victoria Avenue- -from Rtivauda Avenue to 40 Route 15 27. Highland Avenue —from Archibald Avenue to 35 eerwaa Avenue 28. Rigblaod Avenue —from Rarmass Avenue to 45 800' vast of Seven 29. Viaefard Avenur -from Stb St. to foothill Blvd. 45 (0rd. 169 section 1 (part) , 19821 Ord. 39 Section 5.1, 1978) . Rnncbo Cuccwosa 5182 124 (i) Both sixty -five (0) nles per hour and fifty -Live (55) miles per hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe) (ii) The miles par hour as otated are the prima facie speeds which am meet appropriate to facilitate the orderly wvsaent of traffic and are speed limits which are reasonable and safe on said street+ or portion$ thereof{ (iii) The miles par hour stated are be,eby declared to be the prima facie speed limits on said struts{ and (jv) The Traffic Saginser is hereby cuthorisad sad directed to install appropriate signs upon sold streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit declared beruin. The City Clark shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the inme to be published as required by law. /38 M I �r 0 n 9ECYIOm 4, The Kayor &hall sign this Ordinance and the City Clark shell cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passule at least once in the Oai y Raenrt, a uevapaper of general circulation published 1i the City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1956. AY99e NOES: ABS96:- ATTEST, Jaffrey King, Meyer Beverly A. Authalct, City Clark I. BBVSCLY A. A97HELSY, CIYI CLERG of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a .` regular meeting of the Council of the City of Anebo Cucamonga bold on the 17th day of September, 1906, and was fiarlly passed at a regular metric& of the City ? Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hold on the a day of 4, 19&4. Executed this a day of a. 19+a at Rancho Cucamonga, California. It Sevsrly A. Autb&ltt, City Clerk ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Cctober 1, 1985 a T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lioyo B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Etiwanda Avenue Stone Curb Standards and Policies The staff and Historic Preservation Commission are recommending the adoption of standards and policie; as outlined to the attached Resolution. In addition It 1s reem vended that Council affirm certain segments for restoration with budgeted funds. BACKGROUND: Council will recall that for sometime the Citizen's Advisory Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission have expressed concern that the City is not actively pursuing preservation of the Etiwanda Stone Curbing. Both Commissions are particularly concerned with damage which might occuw :m• relation to construction activities along Etiwanda Avenue. In an attempt to addnts these concerns the Engineering Division has been working with the Historic Preservation Commission to develop the policy embodied in the attached resolution and draft agreement. Also as a part of this effort a Standard Drawing has been developed for the replacement and reconstruction of the rock curbing. A prototype of the standard curb was constructed at the Chaffey Garcia House. The final standard follows the prototype with the exception of Increasing the gutter to 24 inches and establishing a more pronounced and uniform top lip. P;;aOSED POLICY: The attached resolution expresses the Council's intent to restore the rock curb along Etiwanda Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to 24th Street and establishes certain policies related to s,%urity for repair and replacement of curbing damaged as a result of construction activities. Key elements of the policy are: 1. Establishment of a restoration security deposit a> a condition of construction permit issuance. ,.: /510 P �a ■ ICS TO: City Council and City Manager SUBJECT: Etiwanda Avenue Stonn Curb Standards and Policies DATE: October 1, 1986 PAGE 2 2. Designation of an in -lieu fee to be paid for the restoration of curbing damaged by construction activities. 3. Establishment of a Etiwanda Curb restoration fund. Implementation of these policies is accomplished through the attached Cobblestone Curo Restoration Agreement. RESTORiTI01i PROJECTS: Council will recd' that as a part of this years Capital Budget $25,000 in Beautification Funds were designated for restoration of portions of the stone curbing. No specific locations were designated. In reviewing prioritief with the Historic Preservation Commission a priority for reconstruction is the portion extending north from the Chaffey Garcia House to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Funds remaining after this would be expended either at the Intermediate School or iii the segmant on the east side of Etiwanda extending from Victoria Street to the L.D.S. Church. Staff would recommend that future projects be targeted Lo gap areas where future development is improbable due to existing uses. RECOMEIIDATIOM: Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution establishing policies for the preservation of Etiwanda Avenue stone curbing and affirm restoration project priorites as follows: 1. Hest side Chaffey Garcia House to Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing. 2. East side from Victoria to L.D.S. Church. 3. East side fronting the Etiwanda Intermediate School Res tfully u fled , LBH:d w Attachments e ' 411 _A t } CITY OF RN CHQ CUCAMONGA COBBLESTONE CURB RESTORATION AGREEMENT This Agreement made this _ day of 19 6 and between Y `Permittee an the c o ancho ucamongae hereinafter reearre referred as to as `City' provides as follows. WITHESSETH WHEREAS, Permittee has requested issuance of Encroachment Permit No for construction of certain improwimants described therein in the public ;'{g62 -of -way located alonn Ettwanda Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City has established the conditions that certain existing Cobble /Stone Curbing disturbed or any other way altered by construction be permanently restored per City standards or temporarily restored per City standards and funds for permanent restoration be deposited in a Cobble /Stone Curu Replacement Acce.nt with the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: I. Permlttee shall deposit with the City cash in the sum of Said rash deposit shall be security for Permittee's per ormincu as era nafter provided. 2. Permittee agrees to construct all improvements described in Encroachment Permit No, within the time specified in said Permit. 3. For good cause the City Engineer may extend Permittee's time for dayson TheaCityaEngineerrmay requireo,,, Increasenin thee cash ddeposlt( as ) a condition of such extension. 4. The City Engineer shall determine if said restoration is to be temporary or permanent depending on the extensiveness of the Cobble /Stone disturbed. 5. The Permittee shall pay the City $25.00 per each linear foot or part thereof for Cobble /Stone Curbing that is disturbed and to be temporarily restored as determined by the City Engineer. 6 The Permittee shall perforn all restorations as prescribed by the City Engineer within the time periods above stated. .. 1 ;at,.. _. NQL ,� 7. If the Permtttee falls and neglects to comply with the provisions th's Agreement, or falls and neglects to construct all of In Encroachment Permit No. er fails Improvements described of the and neglects to perform all restorations presort ebb" y6' —"'F,t e Clty Engineer, or falls pay to the City sums and neglects to as stated in Paragraph 5, all within the time stated in Paragraph 2 of this period Agreement, or any extension thereof granted by the City Engineer, then Permittee shall be deemed Agreement. to be in breach of ill to Pero;8. Upon any breach of this Agreement by Peimlttee. City shall have beet not thtodbeyinstalled. i cause the the described and topcauseoall restorationsC�ent Of prescribed by �Fe City Engineer Co be performed. In the acts, the City event the City so shall have the right to recover from 2th Peve tithes Of the cash If said sums 43 right to Citytshallihave the recover from Permittee the difference between the the City's costs in so acting. Cash deposit and 9. In t of leg action to Agreement. orhtoerecover anyasum'hereundernduecthehCity rovisions of this from City shall be entitled Co reasonable attorneys fees. the IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first Above written. PERMITTEE: i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P j.. MY ng neer a a n r„ Y' i h ,.. A13 i city of rancho Cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING '.��!(r.•.i� "'r .may Y CURB PERSPECTIVE EDGE OF CURB TO 8" PRESI .HOOTH APPEARANCE. 14824" r 0.10' A" 18" f ` • �% �''� • EXIST. PAVEMENT `4. CAa .' .; SURPACr "AN BARS (3) ARE. 14 '� CONTINUOUS - " %aTtb 32'. • , MUD' REQUIRED & F1aTEND 12" 32" L_ � AS DOWEL COBBLE CURB 3 GUTTER CLIZ & GUTTER 13071 It RETE SHALL.BE 600 -E -3230 PEA GRAVEL, E SIZE SHALL VARY WITH OCCASIONA• IrL'LUSION OF r o ER SINGLE SIGNS, ELMENTS, LPPROACHES RIVE APPROACHES ALONG NDA AVENUE CNALL EE C}:AI. RETURN STYLE AR TO THE CHAFBET - GARCTA . r; �r COBBLE f ` • �% �''� • EXIST. PAVEMENT `4. CAa .' .; SURPACr "AN BARS (3) ARE. 14 '� CONTINUOUS - " %aTtb 32'. • , MUD' REQUIRED & F1aTEND 12" 32" L_ � AS DOWEL COBBLE CURB 3 GUTTER CLIZ & GUTTER 13071 Res . 2(� - ;)9a- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU:AMONGA; CALIFORUTA ESTABLISHING POLICIES FOR THE PRESERVATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF ETIWANOA AVENUE STONE CURBING NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD California recognizes the stone curbing ofalOng Ftiwanda Rancho Avenue Cucamonga, Foothill Boulevard as a unique historic resource; and WHEREAS, the city wishes to actively promote the preservation and restoration of the Etiwanda Avenue stone curbing NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California: I. All new development shall be required to restore by reconstruction Etiwanda Avenue Stone curbing in conformance with adopted City standard acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. 2. As a condition of issuance of Construction Permits within the right -of -way of Etiwanda Avenue from Foothill Boulevard north, the City Engineer shall require a thorough photographic documentation of the condition of curbing within the influence of the be useddtoconstruction anycdamage to stoneicurbing which is caused by construction operations. Permittees who cause damage to the stone curbing shall be required to make temporary repairs as directed by the City Engineer, and make payment t4 the City a damage fee equal to the ^urrent cost to reconstruct curbing to City Standard for each linear foot or Portion of linear foot damaged by construction activ,tiesI Funds collected in this manner shall be deposited in an Etiwanda Avenue curb restoration fund to implement a program for general restoration purposes. To s:cure the payment of damage fees, the City Enginee^ shall require each pormittee to post a deposit equal to a minimum of one -half of the length of curbing which may be impacted by the proposed construction operations. The City Engineer may, at his discretion, increase this deposit if in his Opinion the minimum deposit is insufficient to adequately protect against damage. Judgment a:• to the extent of damage shall be the sole discretion of the Dams Damage sr based on the Photographic 9 fees shall se withdrawn fray the end re+•�alO funds refunded ovidence. even deposited funds are In to vere dam ]es t the City engineer sh P.,.c -e, In the excess funds. all bill the pe,,ittae for the 3, the Council as a part oY its annual foorrrth ant Program shall consider available which econstruction Caoltal dwh1ch wouie not Othenytiseical segments of fund n9 Pment activities. be reconstructed baby I- 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT UATRt October 1, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager �(��� FROM: Mark R. Lorimar, Adcinistrative Analyst )'^"'— SOBJI'CT; ARD RIATTLR t17 V�,yS CAYLt^ 4KC70R CCRIROL Dj$jyjsj e e• 1977 It is recommended that the City Council oppose the requested annexation of Rancho Cucamonga by the West Valley Vector L'o6trol District and direct staff to send a letter to the Local Agency Formation Commission announcing our opposition to this sphere of influence question. Bsgrennd As was earlier explained to the City Council. the City ban received notice from the toccl Agency Formation Commission that the West Valley Vector Control aei. ^• has requested annexation of Rancho Cucamonga into its service site 'be Local Agency Formation Commission boa requested the City's re. Donee of whether it will supports oppose or remain central on this sphere of ini unn.e question. A bearing with LAFCO has tontatively been scheduled for e\rt,.ber 15, 1986. It is important to note a rew points pertaining to this issue. The first. granting anneXaLlon of Rancho Cucamonga into the Vector Control District's sarvica area would allow the District to assess fees for fly control services provided to our residents. presently, general funds are allocated for the City's contract with the Vest Valley Vector Control District for these services. Secondly, the City's contrece with the Vector Control District bas an unspecified termination period. The agreement nay be terminated by either party with or viwut eluse s'wply by giving sixty days written notice. This means that the Vector Control District could pull out of the eoutrsct with the City any time after Piney days notice and immediately assume similar or Identical oparatioce under an tssessment district. It is also important to note that the City has only been contracting with the District since Jane, 1986. Thin is simply not enough time to appropriately evaluate the effeetiveneao of those services provided by the District. You will recall that one of the advantages of contracting for these services vas to allow tiros to evaluate Vast Palley and make a future decision on whether or tot it was in tbd best .utoreet of the City to fore an assenseent district. At the tine the City Council approved the contract with the District, the Council expressed its concern and opposition to forming an assessment district. /y7 ���1. dye✓ .N -. r• � /1 ^. :y�, }s`v^_r.•i+`.�t��� .. .� e�w.. H.'S'j.�; y :._mow, ,.dry Annexation of West Pally Pastor Control District October 1, 1986 Page 2 The Local Agency PorrutLoa Comrissio`n bas requested a posit ?oo from the City prior to Lta Oetobez 15 bearing., Please contact me as soon as.possible with nay comments or a t 15 5 joy uy have: MRLOdja . a. M , M( il t /Y'O ,e