No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986/10/15 - Agenda PacketaTy of RANCHD CMAbSCxVGA CITY CCXJI\aL AGEM]A Lions Petit Cnmauoity Center 9161 Base Line goad Rancho Cucamonga, California QLtoher IS_ 1986 - 7 :e0 gu All items submitted for the City Couacil Agenda rat be in writigz. She deadliao for sabmittLaS these items is 3100 p.m. oL the Wednesday prior to the maetiog. She City Clark's Office receives all mach items. A--- QU1- 7 -.PF>M 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. 2. Roll Cell, Mikal■ _ -, Buquet Riag Dahl _, and Wright B. ANNOM OMTSIPFBBNMAUM I. Thursday, October 16, 1986 - 713C p.n. - PABg DfFBLOPMLNr COMHISSI00 - Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. 2. Yeanesday, October 22, 1986 - 7:OD p.m. - PLABBINO COMHI06IOR - Lions Park Community Center. 9161 Bove Line Road. 3. 'Thursday, October 23, 1986 - 7130 p.m. - AL9ISORT C0.4HISSUM - Lions Park Concunity Canter, 9161 Base Liao Plod. 4. Presentation to Lieutenant Otegg for his samice to the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff Station. 5. Introddction of Andy Swanson - Rancho Cucamonga Drench Librarian. C 6. Preiantetion of Proclamation declaring October 27 - ROPesber 3, 1986 as Red Ribbon Yedk. y City Council Agenda -2- October 15, 1985 The following Comment Calendar iteme are epmoted to be routine and nom- coatrovardal. They will be acted upon by the Ceuacll at men time without discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register He's. 10/1/84 and 10/8/86 and Payroll ending 9/18/86 for the total amount of $1,348,236.77. 2. Appro -al of the 1986 -87 Increment of the Housing Assistance Plan which includes a summary of the three year Scala, the goal increments for 1986 -87 and a narrative section explaining the programs. 1. Approval to award the improverent of Arrow Route and 12 Riath Streoe, between Vineyard Avenue and Archibald Avenue to the appareot lcuest responsible bidder, Fontana Paving, Incorporated for tbm amount of 8287,422.04. Approval of Program 8uppleveat No. 11 for the Local 14 Agency State Agreement for Federal -Aid Projects No. 3 -5420 between the City and the State of California for the Improvewaut of Archibald Avenue at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing No. BBO -522.9 located approximately 1/2 mile North of Base Lima. The City's portion of $13,200 to to be funded by System Development ro "a. RESOLUTION CO. 86 -283 17 A RESOLUTION OF TUB CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C&LIPORd IA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SICMIMG OF PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT N0. 11 TO LOCAL AGENCY - BUTS AGREEMENT NO. 8 -5420 FOR CROSSING PROTECTION MODIVICATION AT ARCAIOALD AVENUE AND TSB SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CROSSING 50. BBO -522.9 5. Approval to mascots both the "Agreement for the 18 Acquisition of a Park Sits" and the "Density Bonus Agreement" between the City and Jean Deukmejian, Trustee for the Deukmejian Family Trust, relating to a Proposed neighborhood park site located on the south side of Peron Boulevard, East of Turner Avenue. �Ip City Council Agenda -3- October 15, 1986 6. Approval of Resolution Ordering Preparation of 19 Reapportionment Report for Fareel Map 9530 within the Sixth Strove industrial Part Assessment District (82 -1 R) . RESOLUTION DO. 86 -284 20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CAUNCIL OF TFr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFC`IA, ODEBL C TdE PREPARATION 04 A REAPPORT103MENT REPORT AND AMENDED ASSES3M711T MD DIAGRAM IN A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT MD ESTASLISSING REAPPORTIONMERT P393 FOR PARCEL HAP 9530 WITHIN THE BIRTH STREET INDUSTRIAL PARE ASSESSMENT DISTRICr (82 -1R) 7. Approval of Purchase Agreements with BSCI and COI 22 Computer System, Inc. for Geographic Information System's hardware acquisition sad installation totaling $85,460.40. Fiscal ywar 86 -87 budget sources are accounts 01 -4637 -7044. 01- 4373 -7044, 01- 4313 -7044, 01- 4333.7044, 33 -4130 -7044, and 70- 276 -445. 8. Approval to redeem bonds, publish and mail notice of 31 redenptioo to bondholders within the Alts Loma Channel Assessment District 84 -2 for prepaid assessment totaling $165,000.00. 9. Approval of $171,680.00 loan repayment to System 34 Development Fund from Alta Loma Channel Assessment District Capital Improvement Fund and replauishmeot of Alta Loma Channel Assessment District teserve Fund in the amount of $65,000.00. 10. Approval of Professional Services Agreement for Survey, 35 Rigbt -ot -Way Engineering, foils Report and P.S. 6 E. for Base Line Road Improvements, Archibald Avenue to the Southern Pacific Railroad crossing. The consulting engineer to be Linville -Civil EDgiueers /Land Surveyors. Inc. for a fee not to mused $18 „240 to be paid free the gem tax fund. 11. Approval of street improvement agreement between 48 Seboatisoo and Matthew Filpi and the City of Rancho Cucaemcea for tho Filpi'• Street frontage improvements to be included with the construction of the Arrow Routo-Ninth Street Improvement Project{ a pro -rata contribution of $8.687.15 3 will be paid by the Filpi'e. A City Council Allende -4- October 15, 1985 RESOLUTION N0. 86 -285 A RBSOLUTION OF THE CITY COONCIL 53 OF REECHO COCAMLMCA, CALIFORNIA N THE CITY AGREEMENT BQII78p1 THE CITY ' APPRANCHO CUCANd3CA ADD SEOASTIARO AND MATTHEW OP RANCHO ' FOR 738 iMerALLATION OF 9TRF FZ:PI ' IMPROPEMRETB B7 FRLNTACB 12. Approval of Tract Napa 12802 and 12802 -6 located !n Che r Tetra Pfats Planned Cemaunity, submitted by Levis Eomea Of CallPora,a. 54 RESOLUTION NO. 86 -285 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CO 55 OF RANC COUNCIL THE CITY PIAAL MAP OF TFAC78 60. 012802 R t) e02-6 AC 128D2 AED 12Pg2 -6 13. Approval of Parcel Map 9487 located on the vent side of so r Boulevard, tia 8iyhurch Street and Foothill nrd tub P nevick Corporation. RESOLUTION R0. 86 -287 A R850LO7ICU OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tax CITE 59 OF PARCEL MA CLIMB MO GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROFLIO PARCEL NAP NUMB 9487 CTPNTAII7g PARCEL MAP A0. 9487) 14. Approval of a Bubo rdiaation Agreement for 9260 Butta:�[te, surnazd eC b7 Agreement epban L. gutters. Nona P. 61 and Be Cleo Dau Ehezty. RE30LOTIOR N0. 86 -288 A RESOLUTION OF rag CITY CODNCIL OF 768 CIS! 64 OP RANCHO RECAMOICA, APPROPDNC A BOBORDIAASI® A:RREM29T STEPHEN L. BOTSBES, MGM A P. BOITSRB. PAND BERNARD CLEO AtOGHER7Y AND AUTROR22ing 7UR MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAMB 15, Approval ecurity for Tract 1provement Agreement and leprovenoot Vogt of Daer Creek located east of Devso Avaaue, 65 Avenue, submitted Chaonal and Icurh of DLgblaad 6P Claofad Davelopmaot Corporation. 1 city Council /.jeada -5 October 15, 1986 REMOTION H0. 86 -289 A RCLUTICH OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY D2 ES OF RANCHO COC"UVGA, itLIFORNIA, APFgOVINC MPROVEMEbT ACREEHERi, 1 :PROVEMENT SELVEIT2, AND PINTS M RA AP OF TRACT 110. 12952 16. Approval to purchase 18 budgeted vehicle, in the amouar 83 of 9264,373, 17. Approval of Bever Easement tbrougb the City Park si to to Cucamonga county pater District for wl111am Lynn Development Tract 1:U57. 18. Approval to award the Engineering Ccotraor for conor"etion dravings to improve Eary1 and Lion& Pars, 90 19. Approval of Contract Change order No. 1 from C ^. 8s -134 for additional landscape arcbitecturd aeraitaa b Rsr iol p4 H[ubtk dnocl ate,. 91 mdifiad Bl include design The contract is being tonvtrot ti to include E and the preparation of Alh Btreot n dot for Haven Avenue medimna from 97,000 is oo Avenue. The manont not to "coed to be drawn from Seautif ;cation Fund,. 20. Approval of Imp: ovnmsne 11577 lou ced oc for Esc,usion Agreement for react vast aide of Turns. Avenue, eoutb Of Ease Line, submitted b 93 y Tarraoco Leee. RESOLUYIOR NO. 290 99 A OE8CLUTICH OF THE CITY CO OP C8J UNCIL OF ?8E CITY 2M COCAMCRCA, CALIPOA97A. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ErT198Ies AORaEHOIr AND IMPROVEXIBS SECURITY FOR TUC? 11577 21. Approval of Parcel Mep 9955 lots tad between Azrov High my and Civic Cauttr Drive and between Red Oak sad 100 Ubite Oak, submitted by B.0 E. Development. RESOLUTION N0. 291 102 A RESOLUTIM Of TOE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAHCOO COCAMORGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVINU PARCEL HAP N0. 9955 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP H0, 9955) 22. Approval of Re,olutioo oppoa; -8 Proposition 6;1 on November 4, 1986 ballot. 103 'Lr, L I City Council Agenda -6- October 15. 1986 RESOLUTION P0. 86 -t92 104 RESOLUTION OF IHE CITE COUNCIL OF TUC CITY OF RANCHO COCANOBCA. CALIPORd Lt. OPPISINC PROP081TIO8 62 23. Approval taff of the eafsting City logo and authorizing said I too Procaod with legal requirements to copyright 105 R in order to prevent unauthorized use. 24. Approval of temporary use of personal vehfele by Dave be I. , Ndnttneaee Superintendent, on An interim 106 hula for City business and uthorizn pgmaot of 9250.00 par month auto allowance to help defer costs. 23. Approval to execute the agreement for repl aaemene of overhead with Underground Distribution facilities ca 107 Califon is City of GO OcbO Cucamonga an. the southern California Edison Company and the reallocation of additional Beautification Nelda in the amount of 997,389 to Dravida for this agreement and the completion of the utility undergroundings as art Victoria t with the Barmuss Avenue widening from Victoria to 19th Hereet, the Hamilton Street Exteaslon and the Hermosa Park construction. RESOLUTION NO. 86 -293 111 A RESOLUTIOI OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of iBE CITT OF RANCHO CUCANONGA. CALIFORNIA. TO UN COTE THE ACREEMANT FOR RBPLACEHl97 0➢ ONXECUT NITS UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES NOR HERHOSA AVENUE AND BANILTON STREET AND TO ALLOCATE BEAOTIFICAT70H FUNDS FOR TBB PUBLIC POND ACPIMDIIURES RLIOIAID BY SAID ACAEEFiQ1V RED TOE O TNPANTAIC CITY EXPINNDIT -Vi RP.LAIID DI THE HERHOBA AVENUE UTILITY UNDEBOROONDINO 26. Approval of release of bonds and Notice of Completion; Par "al Map 7827 - Locatnd on Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue. 112 re' *4@03 Faithful rerforeauce a• a (Street) M0,400 RESOLUTION 00. 294 114 A RESOLUTION ON IRS CITY COUNCIL OF THE t1ITY OF RMCHO CUCAMONGA. ACCEPIING TDB PUBLIC AOT ORIZIBGB TBBO FILING OF MAP 7827 ARD COMPLETION FOR "I PORT ~ POTICB OP Cie. Council Agenda -7- October 13, 1986 Parcel Map 5792 - Located on the Beet Bide of 115 Archibald, north of Bass Liao. Releasti Faithful Parformace Bond (Street) 5 49,400 RESOLUTION B0. 293 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of IBM CIR Of RANCHO CUCAM ®CA. LCCEPTIgC THE PCBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PM 57P2 AND LOTHORIT130 THE FIL130 Of A HOTICE Of COMPLSTIO.1 FOR THE BOPS 27. gat puelie bearing - Hovesbar S, 1986 - Appeal of Planning Comm(ssion decioion regardio3 Terra Vista cul- de-sac fearing. 28. Bat public bearing - Novesber S, 1986 - Environmental Assessment and General pill* Amendment 86 -03 -8 - Clurman - A request to coed tba Land Use Element of the Ceneral Plan from Medina Density Residential (4 -14 du /ac) to Neighborhood Camaarcial for 10.7 acres of load, located at .he cortbvest corner of gave* and 0ighlaad - APN 201- 262 -20. 30. 31. 36, 37. eO. 41, 43. 29. get public bearing - Devember S, 1986 - Environmental Assessment and Development District Amendment 66 -03 - Clurma - A re4uest to &mend the D"elopmant District Map from "M" (8 -14 du /ac) to 'NC" for 10.: acres of land, located at the aoctbvest corner of Haven sad Higblaed - APS 201- 262 -28, 31, 31, 1S, 37, 40, 41, 43. 30. Bet pool ie banning - November S, 1986 - Environmental Assessment and Central Plan Amendaeat 86 -03• - City of Rancho Nc mega - A request to amend the Land Use Element of the Central Plan from Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) to Office for .75 area of L land located on the soutl, ride. of Foothill P.ulevard 1125 feet vest of Hellmau Avenue (9113 Foothill Boulevard) - A11N 206- 241 -09. Jl i:. 117 r a' a { ry Cle' Council Agenda -8^ October 15. 1986 31. Csa Public 3 �Eo ACIT, oaatb D[otc c1986 rev, 1 omeatol "a :10Pmeat e+maag6 - 4 Amendment 86-04 - "OP" (OflleeDlt t -itt `4p from apps request to stand ebe loan led /Prolotelootl) for 75(14 -24 du /ae) to .feet O° the 804 one aide at Po0tbLll Dour Ott of th flan d ace of Iaad APp 208- 241 -09, vacua (9113 lootbiIl bowl evatdj25 32. Set Public at and Ganarr2 P1aa Ameodaae 9f6 b =anent'] usae b+nch0 Cucatq ev! anent ,loan of the Ca - A ieQ oat' mmeadd tbeb Land of Medium Denait eceral P1aa y g+►ideetlal (4_° O• -f tee /Prole+ 0to of land located et CDt 14 du /ee) for professional to AreblbN4 -App 1077 -332: beast cozaar of CbureDaud 33. ga Public near City vent and Develop' l - bawl r eveloPenatd District ba Cueaeo, Aneadnen 86-e06 e1 to Cbumhaiad af load loea led "et" +7u"eMe^ (8-14 du /ac) of reb Lbald - Alp 10 at the - Iouthvatt coraar 36. of Anrb lid General Pltce nand 1986 - bovtroanental the g+nrh0 Cucamonga Cetial f�v�sea del] fnitlo Pot Nedl * text to peeldc nt[el 33, .velling unite ere g unite acre 0peL14 to 8- 40cho 611e besting _ Boveeber S. 1986 gaoeDamant manadb : Q =a,A Plan Avande�amand- Sovirvame tof gleaent Caf+ SOQaaet to P geeldaatial (4 (4-14 8 do /ec /ac)Plto Lou from NNed the fuaL Density a, cuoral at tb riven° °, ,,orc pe of ca 202-101-21. .19tb eatreet avail, located el 80 lift SUBVITT dD City Council Agenda -9_ October 15, 1586 1. AM1JV1Nm Prn2G 9RiHMc9 1 • .QI�Qd� V `� � Dorf I VI2D AtN QA ^[( I0 aTEBET r-� niare7cr No. 2 ,1��'�' 116 8D9. 9869 L1 ^1992. llROR -2. 116 Ya`9, 11606 -4 11606 S 10827 1f827 1 10827 -0, ]0827 y�ll62R. IOO7R, r0 19nRR, RfS OLVT[O: N0. 85 -296 119 A RESOLOTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL 01 THE CITY OF RINCBO COCANONILI, CALIFORNIA, ORDERAIG THE WOilt IN CONNECTION NITS ANNQATION NO. 13 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT SO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE "YAL EIGINEM'S REPORT FOR TRACT ED& %49. 11793, 11932, 12726, 12727, 1280t, 13117, 11606 -2, 11605 -3. 11606 -4, 11606 -5. 10827, 10827 -1, 10827 -2. 10827 -3. 11626. 10076. MD 13066 2, nRDERnc iPR Vp! 2N crazy -yixe AeeaAnat Ro 17 137 20 aTFENT 170 L7iIS1 NAIV7fiArfE O7STRiCT WO. J� aD_ N Tip �y $p�,,yjd9. 11791 11919 �9an. 12727 19117 23x09. .loDn 7 CDR -9, 11606 -4. II60A -5 Inp`p 106]7 -1 IOB27 -P ��7 9. 11A26. I007a;�� S AnD 13V61t• R380LOTIOR N0. 86 -297 138 A REMOTION OF TDB CITY C001NCTL IF TS3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAN(LCA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERIIIC TDB W0FM IN CONNECTION WITH MNEIATION N0. 17 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 110. 1 ADD ACCEPTING THE FINAL 1NGINSna,S EBPORT FOR TRACT N0. 9649. 11793, 11932, 12801, 12726. 12727, 13117, 13205, 11606 -2, 11606 -3, 11606 -4. 11606 -3. 10827, 10827 -1. 10827 -2. 10827 -3, 11626, 10076, 11915 MD 13006 f1NPi R(ANMQITAt As =-- E1T AN•1 7EReA pIS71 fpYYONi7Y PLAN 159 requestIIt RR..01 — l PY79(e . Tai.= — A propose to umi, the land use nap of Tarra Vista fro■ proposed J(4 8 Hlgb School site to Lou Nadiva Residaotlel (4 -8 dveiling unite par acre) for 2C acres Of land located on the vast hide of SOchester, north of Chore Gtraot and various related amendments to the density provisions of the Community Plan. City Council Agaed■ -10- October 13, 1986 ORDINANCS B0. 301 (first reading) 193 AM ORDINANCE OF THE LITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA CO.YMUBITY PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -01, TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO CHANCE THE LAND DSE DESIGNATION FRdf JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL BITE TO LO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DU(AC) NOR 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED OM THE HEST SIDE ON ROCHESTER AVENUE, BORTH OP CHURCH STREET 4. YNVIENMMRITAi._ IegE96MEd! IRO 7KPaA YIRlA PAIR 159 PE42T.LOFEII7 AC PPDIjY! p(j� N _P Il9! SOVPt.I!��+� AGBBBEm2 - A &UPPleventel agreement regarding the ePProsimate 20 acre site located on the vast side of Rochester, earth of Church c' eat. ORDINANCE NO. 302 (first reading) 194 AN ORDINANCS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFONIA. APPROVING FIRST POPPLBMMIAL AOREEMIN" TO THE TERRA VISTA PARR DEVELO} ZMT RRPMNNT Zo. 1 BE7HEPP THE CITY of DA. -b0 CUCAMONGA AND LYDIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.. HSSTSIA PROPERTIES. LEVIS DOMES OF CALIFORNIA AND LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPLRY 5. P.BQGBAI➢11,NC pP raamrin nmeLDPMaT B[OQ . a ■! [ .per. 205 XWA - Programming of $63,000 in Additional 1986 -87 CORO funds and reprogramming of $44,000 in unmpendad 1982 -83 CORD Funds. RESOLUTICH 80. 86 -298 207 A RMOLVTI0N Of TRB CITY COUNCIL OF TUB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. RKPROGLUMING PONDS FROM Tg6 1902 -83 CoI"ITY DEVELOPMFAT BLOCK CHANT AND PROGRAMMING ADDITIONAL 1966 -87 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK CHANT YUMOS i _ 0 City Council Agenda -11 _ October 13, 1986 6. IIC OY COB PURDe PBT AHiDp P01 NORr• - 208 IV— D am DCBD pOR llnm •r �� 150 DoO= - Reprogramming of 1904 -83 CDBU funds of 9150,000 for Borth Town Park Site acquisition to Worth Tset Park develepaant. (Continued from October 1, 1906 Use ti ug) RESOLUTION NC. 4 -272 T08A A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCLNCJ". CALIFORNIA, FUNDS FROM THE 1901 -85 COMMOHITr DEPEI.OPMMT BLOM GRANT PROGRAM PROM HOIT- TORN PAR[ BITE ACq N TO E OISITIOE USBD FOR H0. -S TWH PARE DIVELOPMENt 7. 183SE0Rtlaj•1L AtCEnawS�•_AgD DRp dtlIDDtlnlr RA O2 _ rrtT n. �ttlatr Drnr.,r. 209 to uaod the Davelopmsnt District M n request du /ac) to MLM" (4-8 du /ac) for II .Sf aQra"V (wed located on the mouth side of Varna, east of Archibald Avenue - AN 209 -085 -02, 03, 14. ( Contioued free October 1, 1983 axstiag) ORDIRRARCB NO. 299 (first reading) 218 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RARCHO CDCAMOSUA, CALIPORSU. RE20NNG .SS8SSOE'R PARCIL N0. 202 -055 -02. 03, 14 LOU,Z;^ ROUTH RIDE OF YBRON. WT OF DD /ACBALD *Z— "L" (2-4 DU/AC) TO "LM" ,4 -8 0. 11LYBRPMm1i tiR6IIlL12 - Rr nee.. •i,,,.5 "2L21121r NO t - An aadudu 219 ent aatcodiag the term from tventy -2Lve years to forty years for a duvelopment agreement between the City of Raacbo Cucamonga and Philip D. Schlosser, Blain LchhOnser. Alert Solquia e M. , Jr., Roberta J. Schloss, Jeffrey . Schlosser, Jacquelin L. Richards, David d diM. R)cbardson and Cann H. Richardson, regarng the future devulopment and current operations of the industrial facility on 27.7 acres at the southwest corner of Arrow haute tad Cocbamter Avenue - Apy 229- 111 -05, 17 mad 18. City Council Agenda -12- October 15, 1986 ORDINANCE N0. 303 (first reading) AN ORDDUNCA OP THE CI 230 OF RARCDO TI COfhC GoCAMD1C,g� CALIFOSe I OF T8H CITT AIOCODNPRT N0. 1 TO THE DSVELOPGT ACPROVDOC D6 BCHLOS88gCITT OF RANChO COGgOpW, RpB�PIP B01/.july. JEI ALDERS 80LQDIN, JR., ROH78RT J. SCHLOSSER M P. SCHLOSSES JA(T;UtL� L. . RICR&SOS 1 DAVID M. NICHARDSp1 AND Clag M. pp����.�,,..��,.,, is CITT�� J� pre+ant, ' man ° vani` AM�r'QW ida Projects"" City HeautifLcatioe 232 2• &1Yftr Aver - „-KLQIdN 1.Ianq •pR Oaven Avenue hodiao Lsndsc ' - Approval of +De Concept. 233 .v III9,IMDN 1.OT AND nql� B��Rr e0R Nt R[R9 4 234 If the i1'�,Y:.LZSiR rdlrgnr h Rancho Cucamooge to Pt ODosed sphere of iu(laa— n_ 9 236 i °mess +rY that the _ he District is desired, it is d(rec Lion is requested be Cbe revicved bF L.1FC0, polio October 1, 1986 mo+ting)1 Sty Council. (Continued from S. RITR Vrin 7RR tK 3R OF FANC00 �� Vvw+..,rn• OR �Zil�Op A�� t�� 238 m + rP N+ }rOT NV + rWR +R P. -N PNNp np nnTmWOJ�I. +nmO}u.rr T Iur2JnYOTpbC -. M M IT V.wV WVOrN6JdPbJrJrrrN Jdr.- ynpRNVVNNd Vb IK nnnnnnrnnnnnnnOn rYW I.Y TY ^�'ODnNDTn NT n 1 O ^^CCOtl C_Smf» An-m Or rr I > }�" .IS �12 ^M' ^ryNrn -: >O 'narYr >DO n"'m T• < C P 2T CCNLOTTYr r n O_ y2r22T a Z r OtlOyrr�r'WOO ° nrrm> m} O ^M n-.Y mN O 1 Y c>51!f�ozai�M �.>'.�in q'iio° rr- rr- rz..>a.NSr wrs°nn� rr°n i i + Tiw°. adz ani i .°. nH n i ro } i i A rn T > m T rnYr<P= iN44Mn Y.. r.w ....... mY> NO n j NY °V S.r• GDa09' y � S >rmmYmZ }m..j Z 1.- nCTr ae rrrr. -<Nr�� nnr mini Yr o +nn n �" Im i�a.n }rmT N N .cwanm+i'�.:i4r..i.o 4i m r1..Y.�noi zT ii N� - '•} -->.�r 'm° siaa. - ntlrorzi��o naa m e x r r.: dT r Y> > ZiN _nJ i m >OT OY e�rnr N 'N 2Tn r/. rn �I T1r J (aj >xI i�Y In � tmal 1 a ><m J >m InraO T w 1 ai SO .=N > r Nm�oc N iw 1 4 e }V aDn r i 4 'Om 1 nnn n nn n.°.iN m n � � � °•� nn n� i J m�2r c•o iTx T T'� xy�a S T y TTY ST µrY 1 ADL D Tma Da y T aD DD .w 2 YNOrrrr� MN M .iw N Ni r NmmVm4 1 S r M1N2 O u °u p-000 o-o-000wanu000io or0000no .+ NNNNNNN N. +NUU i D i onoo +uNo'nnoroai ooacd'aaoaeoboennoboRpPN .`4 `dm yo .`uiuwrorob- .pv Wwn......v iuu..o .. N.- � c i } IL ouor.JNJNNNr�Nnu .w N.oNN:NUaNNN +r .ii ba r ii uoarR +n + +noauJ ouN +.{nWnouoYNa +u Iz r Nu:w �iY:r ulo iw iw �oouro. -eo �.s ao �:loo�u oi+n �:w �'.� Nroonrob +d�ooPOnoNPn "clY WOn000P� ono o P V NnPPNV�I +U JVWWQyy ra•TnYP +YJJVNVr`�NJOP a ^ »YnjYni�SiS S1- ^y*TrrhMV•I 4 .OPY6V<VNV Y�INN li Ir t a p . 9 AOyw, nr^ na nn awMR[I S AO �y /� nOn 12S D•., r °TI OT' oQr ,� MOZ ^Sa! n N nn..l S°L^It s w •w' D a Aa �' DA nSin P ^ S CNOin u `yT p li Ir t a p . 9 AOyw, nr^ na nn ° <OVPV +WNrnJOJP V�' + +'yVUy y,+YVYYYWI°iY�OOnn�•' ~J JWNw•O.pry YPVJYVVVNyNYN "'VVVV NrONh•IT UJ U,Ny�� tirr J. ,• N oYJno ±viu a.^.a+.N..4�i',+•o,°e o, N,J-r. +OIN+w uhr•'w +o n WYO La OOy`+•%O: no °-Ji °c `i «Ih, •riN `J '• h '' +a.lO.Ni�n+� -°. SIG O<OOYN hJ +W �O"! OO M•100 •f i.. a u n a • a 1 2 1 S n ^ C � n i e i • T � N n na nns sy ° u�w s sR n N nn..l s w •w' D a Aa �' DA nSin P ^ S CNOin nni ^^ [�Cny nnn 1 ^ DA T NZ m Onn 2T� w NN SV rti ."n aV2i m as npA � OO n�0000W •' ••rru w w N M w H Pw \AM„ YOOnOnOn` Ni u t2� ° <OVPV +WNrnJOJP V�' + +'yVUy y,+YVYYYWI°iY�OOnn�•' ~J JWNw•O.pry YPVJYVVVNyNYN "'VVVV NrONh•IT UJ U,Ny�� tirr J. ,• N oYJno ±viu a.^.a+.N..4�i',+•o,°e o, N,J-r. +OIN+w uhr•'w +o n WYO La OOy`+•%O: no °-Ji °c `i «Ih, •riN `J '• h '' +a.lO.Ni�n+� -°. SIG O<OOYN hJ +W �O"! OO M•100 •f i.. a u n a • a 1 2 1 S n ^ C � n i e i • T � N h ° :PJrnunu WMTPWU roN i o !' rua•°.•�mnnor.. n.n `ror. rn ri�rurn °u i•r- ii �K NTr Tnr �c «pNp NNNNNNNNNNN.nvD +m a m OI' 2nrr- rnD •9'+M24 D n TZnK�r° mr�52i•m 5 mCm° Ell "'V`- "'V`- ay^"'V`- ns mi .{ e —I•Ai OT "r w a'a Ty� n a92 _T J_'_A Dw nA r y Ow_ D §nonJJ2 JTOTSSN m 1 n 2 amU DD9 N OO)•nSTS + .m 0 t`l n>U y 9D Ym.w n 2 H :w•.� .1 - i•ITnY'f n•T` ITrn/wY(lI w ZN C O rOwe Sw 1 I T ` 1 n G ()m >n�+•NrYN000nO1Y p < O9 ^O•T .f ORKYaaaDpnm n0 9 j Y )In 2Y•n •Sir rZirrTT °m y m Kn A n� »f11 }r \n N� y 1 N n S O TSnmmTmm Ona zw O n 9 Ni00000mw mn � o • y NwNwwN ^ pm i (�f�O tN100 I O 2 CYSZSJ K i TnzNrTa n.nonnNAPUUnA er_nnN >o i s>atrrc a°°Ww- •J:n�nn wl�..m� °s¢m'r •rn cza ° °azsnm�. YJwwo. ,z. irAe° it rraw rTO la=:� a"i zar Nvb� -. rn SuerYm m <N(+< ^mOL) Cw I a n cmrn>r z•. •nN Jw.iaz ? aNZnzrnNN�m2 n.•m i � "vao n °am• � m> m c>T ^ yyNmrmr•J Ia i (+°m ry' Z mD 'm Nfinw O�il'TTy ' ��NAASr2 rT 9'•'mN••SiY 1•w.'�ymyA' "'y 19 TIt m � Zn e�PA2)<1 %N 1 A VZA A e S / Y r`1 • DN m 1 zn n � nn n nnnn <rt nn n � °z,ai J zm 2 STST> TS a a a ma v aaa> 9a ' + n i z .• r > T j N n 1 rwrwrrr rwwwr r r r wr i t corn °nomnocnn000n onrranenno +r uuu•wu WNWWWUWU•i u W 1 r eNi�romn•.K K•IwrKKwKnn niWnP �'P nr •a ' n wrcaa KaNJUUroan -.n NJUNr I• i i n YN + I ♦y' nmf• <NWON IT � n V aLN �PruO�•V aNN �� OPYrJ � T �.•pNOOrIro• OroNJnuNwNwwJUW �t P • PKNwNwV`JNOnynrNUynTPTn li y I )yOwPONU � KI)NOONn Wks .•nwOTPU 1' ~ w oOPr••NO()r WOnONY00�rONOJf 1 l 11 a hi �Y e °�a_a° °Q ^a(�nnnnnn(IWO.°.�.'•.� °rte .'.iee e.7{i.'. w i a e T (A 'S ^^N. .9.. >r I ^�'m1'IS i� >rV .. Y SO y aOTA i r Y �yMrA Y°a• n � i z = n n � n � � e N N Y ti C nY N..y >Yt�T� \O'CIYM >TAVTY_AC wTyw Gn r O 9Y >Ty Ci _ Vr'w9rYT n�yy Y�rlAOnyGn�m>YO AATe,'m O C` (, yy T4 T(1 .Y M Y }}Y n �?< 3�y ^OSO xYiSE YA gN �'�Y If'm nOI N= 2N TY n wv '^ ..Yn."T ` w.~E• LTYr.E.°'. m• iiy(� �zr nor ^xTY > o <.. a ZT zo Own O OrOOr mnflSYntTi YY f'1. OM 6S mrm *tn T T9yM O�4.yTi p ^ 1.1� 'r^ AYA A AEAAx .IAAm mxlEwT T �t01 00 PY i i T Au O Y N Y N xM i^�m T T yzo _P t s N Y N NNS N Y N r V 1 WNy4NNNNNNNNNNON000r ppr 1 1 1 T O.00VP �wlY4f0<LVINJVNrO�Y VOr AIY"VD.IA;(WaVN�GdN I,> n r r '' •• y �� :' rV�LN NI�•JY VI.MMNNMWYNV P•� J V � V ff1 9 SOYOYYA`NVVOOO�.pp ~NNP °i.<N°O (�YVOjPO� H N ry m e'sroeo.lo °oS$VSOOOOY NW r�• I •• ly r g w'u4°ooa u `• 7 a j 3 s � T ` P T i p _ a_a Nsoe.W..W.rn''•u« ;r..N^auyyaJaas «u`pSa«aNy aPJy.l �Irr��v a aNN nmrdla N.. «Py >.cd i JmuP «y >.. o mWnuoru «uay TYODUVWy«yNPNO � � v r.Oy Y 'AVE. 2Tw Dui.. T� OiSn923CTrOnr ly Om"a "a'.O<TinNS i� } 1 .^. }SNwn.^.Ir ^SST�TKrOiOOXiY I x ..Sin mT..i• .O YI IN"DDi23y>T n�bTa y +ODDA nNNn 21�r TT Dm u..w yOn OMY «Tr _ DOT ^y�O�ry 1 l w SiY SOCJ... ^SS }yr Sr n_O 2 1 Q DT � � O rnnniN >YTTi �ZYfil2 yn ST O-Ty -DD-I N OT N p <IniyDi�..rTSn�sa^xv Or A:. m �C.'y>wvr .^..r^ F>T« Ny `w vc ili. nc. ^g rL3 fty n rp �p xrnrTi nnz N6ril'I~�S.ir.2 y YN iYS�N Ciy� a °zg2ynPN iprZ NNn s r. , >YiY yYMC �y y.w 0 in e.n " N i n X..>T n Yr1n n 1 1 iTTi ay a nO n H nii cCi IWn v p � i_w � N Nor az m nn N yr i i 1 1 p^riaWOS n °1cO.'nT�l1 xiJ en ,Te n0i0 iirr- i.T. <uAiz Ni °a Oai+rY rnzi20�TiATLGAX2U5 }Tf<-Y ?awiO.i.? -, U '1 •.o «NfOTZMA •IT TTCNnN.A.r lNn zeiJ'zv99'aiz•s nNinr- uJid »yrs.tp'..J.i i n_ y SC x S9CCnO Y.'•rT r�Np ..CSNm 9.IT yySYC�rnin rry)TS N?n> �NrjM �fNfY }DN i{.yiZ2XOT 122_0 y.S. T.ynTTn YD 'T •.2 n0 NnNmN N T G n � « N }T Tti:NSN »TO T Try M jD Y > TT� NO_N wi'.yr y{c{Y xA p P jRN �`'Y y Y n 1 DIn « M >T ^ GSN p M nnnnnnnn n 2T i.Tny D 1 CpL 0_0000 O iN D^ nM� I. In j TSSZZ222 z rY s0 OCi O O 1 asalisiay i ^ y..7f m ^'^ ? i a^x i i Di T zsm S � T nriTT m �. I S NN.YiM MMM M M M N 2 NNNyNNNNNNNNNNNNNIOIN NUQNNNNNNNN-- --NON4- C NPP!!!!!lPPNMNOV li (1 NN «nd1^IP VJUN..OaOylrJl.�iN.ViOJOMSNJ',V IY S N20dr y�yW.J O rP «NMr Wr N l9 y «O ylay0 �ryr.. NOrdN r OPWON�IVJyO4 \I.O. N,.WOS�00000WN�NOOrVYOPTJNOa li arNy 1) dr0ly00u�J O.pp N 04NOrO rPSOOq10OOOOOOOOYPNOYOd•O•p 8ypr 00008 _ a_a 4r y6Oy� NV I•�D O hK�.•Ij�myn •m i w Q M M3�• 2 D n ••M � i • Cy N T_T rN n w °bX N �Zz.vz, ij+w n T(NM ip Dw�� ••T O nCln TO tih +Ain ��y�EN•'r iN 'w inOA � Jn Tqq y T • ; Dp ^n OR^ � m „x, •"+ a i s •^N : i y�Y • p` ,YN4y O� 12 i) �PM�NY •� /1 s • • i rti i i w •. Nirw N I. y °ewOdNW ;• YY OpS � � Y a 5 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: CUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 15 1986 Mayor and Members of the City Council Otto Krautil, Senior Planner Miki Bratt, Assistant Planner FISCAL YEAR 1906 -87 INCREMENT OF HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN I. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve lFe I988- 7i{ausing Assistance Plan and direct staff to submit the Housing Assistance Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development prior to October 31, 1986. II. BACKGCOUHD: Under the federal requirements for Block Grant rec— ipients. the City Council approved a three -year Housing Assistance Plan last year. Each year, the City is also required to file an annual report. Staff and the consultant, Cotton /Beland /Associates have prepared this year's report which represents one -third of the three -year commitment. The Housing Assistance Plan addresses all programs or projects which meet the housing assistance needs of low income residents. The 1985 -1988 Housing Assistance Plan was adopted by the City Council in September, 1985 and approved by HUD. In the second and third years Of the Housing Assistance Plan, Part IV of the Plan must be updated and submitted to HUD 1986 -87 is the second year in the 1985 -1988 Housing Assistance Plan and the attached Part IV of the Housing Assistance Plan represents the second increment of the 1985 -1988 plan Federal regulations require that the HAP be submitted to HUD prior :o October 31 of the program year. III. HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN CONTENT: The 1986 -87 increment of the HAP includes a summary o e ree- -Year goals, the goal increments for 86 -87, and a narrative section explaining the programs. The six adopted goals relate to: 1. Existing Section 8 program. 2 Rehabilitation loan program for owner occupied housing units. 3. Rehabilitation loan program for rental units. 4. Emergency repair grants for seniors. P 196_COUNCIt STAFF REPORT L I.Cto page bar 15U I,86ASSISTANCE PhARAN r, 5 llortgagc 'c'venue bonds for first t}a7e 6' (,aunty ac'"nlstered rev rental units hxaa buyers, revenue bond program for multt- famfiy finder the above J+lifst ng� }a'poutreach Ntilsfa� X110 "nits h111 receive assf sing units. the rePafr and rehabfittatlon of 1 utmltres Otto k Senior Attachment: Houstng Ass }stance Plan �t A, N ) / — / � A /,� MU to – m. ! / �- , <J §Jf\ , aa� ! ƒ�{ 2 ® 00 / {( //\ tl�a ,+ to / / / { \ \/ � ƒ / ■ } a °f }R J /ƒƒ Aw 7� � § CITY'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NARRATI%T FOR THREE -YEAR AND Ot)E -YEAR GOALS 1985 -1988 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN I. Displacement * t10 substandard units are eapected to be demolished or lower income householdo relocated as a result of direct Federal, State, or local actions. R• I:. Actions the City will Take to Implement Its One and Three Year Goales A. Mortgage Revenue Bonds (owner) The Redevelopment Agency sells mortgage revenun bonds to provide below market mortgage financing for owner occupants. Most users will be moderate income, none are expected to be low income. Issues funding an estimated 1,500 mortgages have bean sold in the past three years. The goal will be realized, therefore, subject only to market conditions and the developers' ability to develop and sell the itomea. B. Multi- Family Revenue Bonds (renter) By cooperation agreement with the County of San Bernardino, rental projects in Rancho Cucamonga with 20 percent of the unite restricted to low income households at rants leas than 30 percent of income, may be financed wits County Multi - family Mortgage Revenua Bonds. Soma 385 additional unite have been Proposed. strong However, pmarket oconditions rand tdeveloper performance will dictate whether the units committed are completed. C. CDBG Rehabilitation Loans Through a contract with the County of San Bernardino, the City offers low interest rehabilitation loans to lower income households citywide. Approximately 8.5 unite per year or 25 unite anticipated to be brought up to standard through thin program. However, in 1985 -86 only four loans were comple.ted although aeveral more are in process. All owners are lower income. q1 occupied sSolelcans are wereb may Pnt d by j 3061 f Om only turen to be anttcl axes ac. be bro cbmpa ro foam during 1985-8 6g but not loanedy re tnrughs In of amongq w"I loan Pro Per fouoance the Programs ando holdsrana °ra P...bh �i�tY of Rancho R. SecClon 8 exist n possible bane£ tasty t paatware ofne The City g (or successor iclpof th No in s entered cs or program) refiniat rtthei y of theooParttlon agreem ent with j, ect the ection San B using Sectlosn aEtw the Cit.ia ono Is Pr Ora The ngoa x° ther affo Market I a ye PIannes daygltotlbe r h° d naftsdy Potential 1 the Cit d i'• Article HIV Referendum °Pment3 under conatrucrt tnhtlie teferoters of the endum Authors tS' h using and uitsonu public nt too A ship aor rtn approved a Thlo Public houstnrently eleven tl- family flse Hof public the °f The City ha g in de City.unita oP nsca[tere rograms. for use wf4 AutfiocltylotO a Cooperation d site ntjLI PlnoS Should ce Plan Year Program 9COnogam°f San BerAgreement iith Cho 0 Affordable Rousing home aVallebie. 8 aroaling I. State Iaw g Incentives any Prding Public ioltlea to offer Intent ect with to low and maderaa least en s or denvit Planned Co Ives mmunities Income affordable ho Cucnmon94 ont la °P the �O r R M• 0 /6,b I Plan- n- commitments The de alue 'PPrOVedmOr proposed Co honafng 1n the Plen. The ° affordable units at Prices rent commits aff develo parcenY households, in e: or rants P a R• Redave change :Jr Cityrincantto lower come lopment ld le Tax Incremect funds from the C Incomelopmen t• projects will be used to Income housin 1tY e bocome avaflableevelopment as na assist low cessary and as funds -- — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT BATE: October 15, 1986 To. City Caurcil and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Nubbs, Citv Engineer BY: Michael O. Long H+ I � SUBJECT: Reroamendatfon to award the Improvement of Arrow Route and Ninth Street, between Vineyard Avenue and Archibald Avenue to the apparent lowest responsible bidder, Fontana Paving, Incorporateu for the amount of S287,422.64 RECD "MATIOM It is recommended that City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the Improvement Of Arrow Route and Ninth Street, between vineyard Avenue and Ar•chi. aid Avenue to thb lowest bidder, Fontana Paving, Incorporated r the amount of f28I,g22,64. Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and oeened en is the 25, 1986 for the subject project. Fontana Paving Incorporated $287.422. j� erent lowest responsible kidder with a f270,480.00. `Staffthasheeviei reviewed all ids heiengi engineer's 's estimatto be complete and in ercordance with the bid requirements. completed the required background investigation ari finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Staff has Re�sp?�ctfully submitt ed. V rr LBM: :diw Attachments �[rrNNN1 Lry i1 \�fyf N Hbn Q'ns b4N�lN f1n OM?=Y 4` �b 'I bT _N -aS ;.? ' O.• 7nNyy faj :�4lf� ��O•� ^�PV NAA�m�<pyyp•99f�f�I��.TD v"n O l J C n p N •� f^ .0 6 r n 6 6 b O ry Now rOO nv x 7 �� bloc V p 40 w TTInT s � v N NNnW.+ q +• G •• n anm N b• n H t W N N t O J p O p � OS C yfyN:CV V%y T N b D. N ONOp N'O r w 00000 O 00 q c :QgNVp VO a Gq N' CC O O nOONn� N W Sp Op N " O C y �N 63 ie� tog; p4 ZiW g V ra N C R O O OOp Op y N 04..,,, b N r pn C e Cp O O N C •Qpp�O+fO °�� �. ' :! O y S n p nf..gNnN C m O O OpgpO pO •O :.f N O q+ 02 C N O N NpO N$ p0 'p' N M V D) p m N q O N f� 8092 W n p N � tnr br q a 41 O�g N b $OpO 'pO O C O Q p,Yy .pi0 q O a �Tpj T Op Op C O ? NgaO W q O-Wi N ON j a y C a O Y R t N O. q r✓l�rT'�°' _ min _ _ .�...._.. i�1 „C �•W'-_Y1`f ��: -� CITY Op• p'�CHO CUC MMM ST,� F ftpoliT DATE: To: Ottcber 15, 19B6 fO C1oty Councfl and City Manager Yd F. BY: Hubbs, City En91near I Lucinda Eppdaeke r SUB,fECT; fFaCeralplement•Nos- Iltant Ctvi Cnglnter Of SouthernfoPa eidfooroJlth s No. 8 -5420 iocol Agency et3oe., the I S�r ., ,,mately 1 /2cm11eanorad/ovemessfn f Archibald gvnd the State Ate REC is be funded 6y vst�BepevL,nl�AnLTheBCl, - Portion a OIENDATIDN; It eru es, r•tfon teat hereby rec oP dir,+cocet A9eri; authorr �'nded that the ' copfessofos�cthe sigh geof- gFeement }orexecgtion of City Council a with cop,( r A9eo� Sta orac herewith Re olu , f'Prnfa DePtrt eo t the Trre pool f8 -5420 d, said At: Rancho to cement atfon along Of Cucrmonga and a Federai -Aid nt g Afd Pry No, 11 to Lh Archfberod r49 supplement �t State of Calfforia is vo, B_Sg20 . e Plaster Local modificatfoea�nue Provides for 0etween I and Souther raft City ofs the lstreot f fourde(gjlyew valflt Rail road Crossing City, at th ity,80D ano the The supplement 9 a of toalicxistf Boo 52p g e Portf tie amo ntoft' O �ouid tha neetdiearls ef13,200 with ale,Po�rtlp low IfOr the wIrterntne side, palkYeard par IL s noted e. thehe FederaihI Pr vision to fncrNJect at Avenue fa�phrveer0ents F contract to and aM Wll Pryvfde o to be Jim se the Resp�c f �elppmen et � dsndfng for-the SuPPlemen� Agreement ertrolc a drawn wit the r417 r 7 Y su6mt� \ l from B L o I - - ..tier.. .-.... FROORAm UtytEfllN7 NO, _; 70 LOCAL FEOB��� AIDTATO4 0187 0 No P,opr- PNO0crram., r0,5g20 P.7p C S8d',_RCUC 12-5- j9u_Ald °MCe nl h A•r•eY In x NO RRI''R9)8 o (3 'U•q•r TCnf 1 -4a I•a�Velect fp Info eelali �l�d IAe [peU AA �I AU9UDt 4. 290 1 r All th IIhoeC•PfOAB•nCyDEj� CY on Dntlq cull urlfY,o, With Hbn t Of I I•t Eh 0• �ntlrlll•A8 Ann 6 FROJ •no will comply oulnt• (J•• coot •11•ch•tlL 0 oil otor•m•�opMtl EDT tOCA71ON; o ATChjha l` on Y•n.nt, c fn.m to D•Y•I PPrpvtl eY he 31,19 M A venue TYFE of WORA. Inst011 'Four d flap S22 at to, SoOthorDl pe fi°rio °weino to 1, Pro:•er, ((t�RD•Itcr CtA No. 3 Automatic D RR �ratl LJ1R8L1VjV4q�rN01NEERON FNABE(8)OFR•O. Gate e�ENOTM: Arlom ,, O O CONBTRUCTI RRU/i (N1LCgj TOTAL EBTIMA TlD Of a ofNR EEfNO -DF'WAY FEDERAL ,8FU NOD CON eTRUC MA ($132,000 3 tom a RR or CD AC(Ount $118 1pOAl ^7N0 Drmek. Fu 03 CS $13,200 OTHER: Oi IF By lOCA AOO& CCV CUCamo _ MER 8YA7 (rRf• pf 4uf 0•'i TOO J!& OF A M o4mt4 10 Att "L A41`*O O/Ity411 ` fly Ar N D /•b/ct D /ryplpr of Tre°�•rt•11 oe 0 we •C•rU (illl•) Ofee/ et ,,,,.. IY bon InY D•r O•t•_ CnbP f , ..' •oni: RnD+ri•Cp� •. � 81•n••• II •.p _ ... At • e,;Cp...... a• r, AC • Dg, •Y1 ........ FIyfind Off .4 f ......., // ) •n CPT • gOaM 11.5 J pq GMC; 8C Cal . - �_ -- a , RRp_R�78 S3 d_O,ROUc "loom 1 A9anxOputin SP` COVENANTS 'page i. P onts n hereby this pro ON Y`MARtfS ? of ? 996 r° =d 1 real 1r gra Su Z. Th° Loams. n the °fore e ee N nd ental be ZO a1 A4 en , onOd Ma � ri,, a eemen Agre rat Ni9hw to f rnee t a et A9reem n Ask-Ur the 0 still Of I 1old Lct 8 Sn y °r It sr tl ha a anal ped °r °nt Por Fod ral -Ald J Is tih 11 c gpodaPa ven ea. odtPt� t U dgAa(howA),Anddur ye�e All PI or ,e Pr n o ac t epts q, the tlme or co 0 heir h° requtr n9s and °Pared by t the P, e On_nce adv by the Futi f Main 10 of Ir the at ion of HUTCp w °ruin ff °e Iio O.•1 jl etos c m1 a c -Qn�I Yd to No Ia�7 A94an � at 1 `On ng shall be a8 allocated RESOLUTXoli H0, CUCARON�g XOH OF ¢ UTHORXZX AGR�� SUPPLEMENT �X CITY U &EL FOR ME CITY QF MODIFICATIO AT ARC - 542011 FOR LOCAL AG yX0N1AtG CucaawnOa eF XT RESOLV Ul No, 800 522 9VENUE AM �UPHE4 p��10C OF ED Dy 1, the City Council Authorize for and of L10 City Local en iha execution lnstellJn Archlbe)d(4X n g iY of Rancho 9atIra 9 o four Ageyee ent N � nSgNo. XI t0 Ratiro C Aver auto 20 for the 2. To droxiryte)y 1 mite northe0f DBO 52 gern acifie re turneof the sign in Base Line, located opt sa fathDiespResolato0 at Fss cAeamat and for tiff convenants BE rea�r� RESOLVED utlon• T ran sportatlonthe State the attached along with 1. eA)T*nt of Local to °9reeme With ell con to c��ea c13,ZO5 and portion Ofncluding; tents and special such 2• TO h construetfon. increases l4 agreeftnt Freefitrt euerafj A In the a 'Nandtscrtai as required 3• To Aid P^o9raas a) Agency ��ee°oennt 8 5420 for oaiuectow117 the Pent Adatnistratlorrave /f4�Yed atf°FCheral funds far such an Financecr�ysesiintl�0acejtCation (PRd ProJOctl Hg�ay an 4 prepared GY iheiOfftettergaOry FundsAas sh to acce SI asresuired Pav of Local ASS1s ifecattenn the an 11 went as e eBLocal Agency 11 he Pa ct hefnrgs and advance fng roa S. The )cards lm k. at tryede ts. Of c�rt1Osat TCO. t of of the th allocated by t�intenance OP Public UC111tfes comtssfon. hail he crossin i I;. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT H:-.�V-72 DAM October 15, 1986 TOt City Council and City tlaoget FROM, Beverly A• Aotbel•t. City Clerk gC}JLCrt A}}(e} L (T tZZSi01aCI I TO Q}C0T! U TILe lr` ACOnTe ITIa• M gy, , T!! llttiv _� 1•ffiMf111R 1lmnT 7}e(T gQ ��'dR1Tll. Tlnar[! em PAw Q �l nnanaen T13"" R }noll�eet Ll}I!_�� -aT n! Agreement cod staff report for this item rill be bsndsd out as loon .e agreement is received prior to Council Naotieg. BWd ja IM J�. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 15, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Robert A. Rizzo, Assista:tt City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwond, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of Resolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportionment Rercr For Parcel Map 9530 Within The Sixth Street Industrial Park (82 -I10. Approval of Revolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportionment Report For Parcel Map 9530 Within The Sixth Street Industrial Park. EVALUATION: Pursuant to Part 10 cf the Improvement Bond Act of 1918 for Apportionment of Asseasmet.te because of the subdivision of land; the approval of Resolution Ordering Preparation of Reapportionment Report Is necessary This Resolution directs the Assessment Engineer to prepare a Reapportionment Report, amend assessment diagram and establish fee for apportionment which is a minimum of one thousand .collars per apportionment or fifty dollars per lot over twenty lots per apportionment. Respectfully Submitted, o art" A. zzo Assist aity Manager RAR=JBF:dm ATTACHMENT: Resolution ordering preparation of Reapportionment Report // RESOLUTION NO. ) (.P - ;I? 7 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF A REAPPORTIONMENT REPORT AND AMENDED ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND ESTABLISHING REAPPORTIONMENT FEES FOR PARCEL MAP 9530 WITHIN THE SIXTH STREET INDUSTRIAL PARE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CI"_'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously confirmed asuessments in a special assessment district, pursuant to the terms and provioions of tho "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", being Division 12 of the Streets and 111;hways Code of the State of California, and bonds were Issued to represent the costs for unpaid assecsments pursuant to the terms and provisions ofthe "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ", being Division 10 of laid Code, said special assessment district known and designated as Assessment District 82 -1R. (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District ") and, WHEREAS, subsequent Chereto, certain lots and /or parcels of land upon which there are unpaid assessments hive been apportioned or divided; and, WHEREAS, at this time thio legislative body is desirous to order the reapportionment of said unpaid assessments pursuant to the provisions of Part 10 of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915 ". NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS HOLLOWS; SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. That the Superintendent of Streets Is hereby ordered to file with the City Clerk a report entitled "Reapportionment Report" and an amended assessment and dia7ram of the original parcel or parcels of land affected by such division or transfer of ownership, segregating and apportioning the unpaid Installments of the original assessment in accordance with the benefits to the several parts of the ori0.tnal assessment in accordance with the benefits to the several parts of the orlginnl lot or parcel, plus costa and fees of making the apportionment, SECTION 3. That this legislative body hereby determines and establishes a fee in the amount of 860.00 for each separate part of parcel of land into which the original lot or parcel has been divided. fee to cover the costs of the reapportionment SECTION ♦. That the Superintendent of Streets Ohall, prior to asking a division and making the amended assessment, notify the owner of the original parcel or parcels assessed, ae the name of the owner or owners appear on the last equalized assessment roll for taxes, or as said owner or owners are known to the Suporintendent of Streets, of the order o! this legislative body fixing the toe's and fees Of the apportionment, and directing that the payment of such costs and lees by made to the Superintendent of Streets within fifteen (18) days of such notification. in the event that the reapportionment fee is not paid within fifteen (16) dave of such notification, the Superintendent of Streets shall proceed to prepare the amended assessment and shall show separately thereon, but as a part of the total, the reapportionment fee chargeable to each divided parcel APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of October, 1988, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Jeffrey King, Mayor ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelot, City Clerk I. BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Reoolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the Caty Council Of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the fifteenth daay of October, 1986. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA &CAA10, STAFF REPORT kyj >z 1977 DAT3t October 15, 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jack Lam. ACID, Community Development Director By; Jerry B. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator $OBJECT %pproval of purchase agreements with ESRI and CHI Computer System, Inc. for oeographic Information System'e hardware acquisition and installation totaling 085,460. 40. Fiscal Year 86/67 budget {313-{33- 4130`7044.4and 7044, 01-43 3- 7044, 70{4, 70- 276 -445. RE co ENDATION: Approval of purchase agreements with ESRI and CHI Computer System, Inc. for Oaogrephic Information System's hardware acquisition and installation totaling 685.460.40 BACKGROUND: In December 1985- the City Council authorized the acquisition of a computerized Ceographic Information System for the Community Development Department dtemue Assessment Sactin' Ageementnwith EnironmantalSys ut" ReseRrch acquisition of hardware, eotewara, an` d others related the services such as training, installation and programming were approved by City Council in May of 1986. EVAL_ OATI?N' Hardware and software acquisition and installation have been completed with modules, macro, database are proceeding lopmentc ntinuhedule.rogramming and to according training and policy The attached purchase agreements with Enviroetemal Ins ears Reoearch Institute (ESRI) and for the acquisition of the romaininq requiredoheQdbyroilhat was budgeted for fiscal yaar 1966/87 and app Council et June 18, 1966. Cost will be allocated amoh0 7044, 33-4130-7044 t1308704{Oand 70 278344644. 01- 0313 -70{ {, 01 -4333- 1 Respectfulllyyoubmittedr jad W;� ack Lam, AICP Orr- community Development Director JL:JDHtdm attachmentei Hardware Purchase Agreements with ESRI and CHI System. a3 ANEG�HpJAND EN9 oNNE17fAL S13IE {qe CITY OF RANtuo CUC &40NCA INSIIINZI' MIS AC�fEP Myr made and a -- INSTI rr ralerrad by and betveQge�GeOro ct e ns c I 'E (ESRI CO i° the Client, eta 8 OF da!/ of Agroeeeac t hsrefa yt.. raf, re NVIR C cr�a�G v1�,RES aade rha herein day •rrad to as cha 'u 54XONQ EARCH Gave Lee `Pig, A"ctcla 1( of our I amend the Additional submit su ° °1 ;cposal v°°ene a c ,Uc ha ep Gmic Provides hardware should the Clie the Contractor yHERAM ra! and nt desire aYacem u annll vLch the a8raenaac t6 both Article 6n01 or it,$reemanc aseJ W add tioae Cola is�earee Darclea 7 WMRSAS, chi Clie y executed nodllf d th"'gG fa APPeodiz cwtlonf nod 'uJ an ha• requested • proposal for CM H°rdvsra NO"a, 1'HEREPO . la eoasl coven�7lCtg 2 prox ee Aeraln derati��cnf she Parties R and of tea mucu listed aet ies lnera ar11j� -ol - PERIOD OF PC agree as lollov� l as loltover Nar were gya ce —If will be mande j 1 -- Isca to ADDendtz ,1Aa Incor�eaced herein, CO 1SASX �e8 of this Agraomaac NIRAC7ISD PERIOD POR CO!!, °I�EIION TARR E Install CalConp vfrh Ploccer 10/10 TASK 2 Esufpaancemalaing Ag G14 mea .day+ °f execution of 11117 '18recman[a days of execution of *If Peaelblc - vendor deDOodenc, 12/01 hardveto as lace STher n OF iASRS ,sand Task 1 will be emaaded ADPaa to "elude J -2160 9/86 —�— DATE J -2160• 9106 .� ARTICLE COMPENSATION The Outlined din agrees t to compensate Chu Contractor as follows hardware outlined 1n tole Aaandnanu for the a. Hardwa[G mount b. Sales tax 030,340.00 1,820.40 TOTAL --• $32.150.40 The schedule for remlcUug b ow cola um :en,atlon to Concracto, is preuncad EVENT APPROXIMAIE DATE OF COMPLETION ET AMOUNT x OF Upon complacion of Snicla -• Within 20 days* clon of this CONTRACT agceamant $ 8,040.10 2sx Delivery of C +1COmp Plotter Wlthln 45 days+ 8,040.10 Delivery of Hardware 25x Wichla 90 day,* 8,040.10 25x Iuscallacion of Hardware Within 100 daysa 8 060.10 ' 25% TOTAL $32,160.40 *Of dace of exenuclwn 100x of contract, AYTTCLE9 S end 6, WANRANIIES and MAINTENANCE are the nor3vara pare n. a warrant as v1 amaodad ee relates co the aquipsant listed herai,. CUp r0° date of installation of • The Nay T, 1986 Agreement between tha Parting shall force and attic[, except remain in as specifically amended by this full agcasmeot. IN WITNESS WgUEOy, the parties • hAVe caused this Amendment to executed the day and year first obove wrlccev. be ' ATTEST: '.SR' SYSTEMS. INC. •,,� �Wl'�IiTOa'" —^-- City of R,ncho Cutemovo. BT 'n.. DATE —�— DATE J -2160• 9106 .� QU 1ze__ P` l h` C "wl � eE IN37',1LIRq 1 104407 1. sr Op C °lc,m SCR1prI0N 1 dt1 00P.08 rli ortc °jbq t 41 M,qd° plget°r 1 n r° °qd poke for OS C&4ced'6L ktroQj3 13. rd 8 CLAC baq[g lor lL'tt°gdar� Cr°pejc Cgr 20dL ICS2 hDjgt°q°gctl 1° S17.60 �2 .%Uc Arq on° C°rdo t CBL61 (Par 81C rde) •nc° p°r C+rd 1002 09 10 )"t d¢J 1s S64.p0 °r natgcerggn. r*yAZ C°bl°° 2160 tea= $13.900 995 6i993 1.230 5.600 � o $30.360 t•t The Ch! Company October 9, 1986 The clt System Proposal For- Of of Rancho Cucamonga SYSTEM Cowncua MOEt The followlna equipment, wAcn c systems, propezl mmu is mcats express communications and Y integrated Snto local processing, ze gviremants your of mainframe oty Item ---------- '- - -_ - -U I-- - - - - --'--'_ ____________ ___ _______ Unft 9 Bane Horkata tlon. CO °= _-- ''- - -' ------------- - -_ Extension 7 Second Sat1a2 or 2 Dot, Natrlx Printores a 4,245 -- 95- - - - --' 6 38.205 1 Daisywheel Pricteras ous ram 1,850 665 2,108 1 GaserPrl nter; 5 OMS Gaser printer: 1,275 3,195 3,825 2 Two -Port Printer Switch: Three -Port 1,795 3.195 1.795 Printer Switch: 5___ 45 225 _- ^Miscellanecus Printez Cables: -- -- - -- --- 165 219 - -- --- - -- - -- ____ Sales Tubtotalo__- (6t); _ - -_8 50,309 3,000 Totals S 05030530309w' 360 , TEEMS: To ensure low purchase price and authorized IBM equipment, Chi has arranged for Moore Brea, California warranty service of all othor hardware Provide the IBM hardware Business System. of 0 warranty check and lnstallat Chi will provide Please Issue one Purchase oft services. to Moore Business fiaee order in the amount of $30 pC -XT2E6 units. 8yat ®a of Brea, Cellfornle ,480.30 the Please iaeua Moots requires 100% payment with Purchase l order• qui pants r tchase order In ooftte of $22,819. Please Company for the reorder r amount balance Purchase deposit with Chi re 7B to due upon Snstallatlon, purchase order quires • with the 07 The ch, October 9,m 986 The CitySystem Pf R n ho S1CrVDJW S a anCSa Cucamonga conditioq receive and hardware Cu cablin amonga. s oftva tetu Included an fp Per wo' asa0mbl Rentable o e will tallatlo bing condl tlo�Ponentsa talnd Chi n y the Ctt , ready fox I lating la Provide , address,,,. l serial °}stem +�e „ y of Rancho numb Chi will 0", this r.gep„ install atl n ca�k all poctm tcA h°ettlnm and subs Panalo1. c111 to to yaebling, Chi fth their and devjtem c Chi will time la! tempt_ Software tb scity bran tYo aervtce,l ,yat m maintain Modification the Proper !n Leff Off-SS}y SERVICEr to figure out ethenherewaree confl ureed not spend equip, involving terms wapAla ivory0 ade the at ao air and re Y to the rod natallat charge fo !°cement v Servfcw Place�e Son, r th9 f dais tormw o,� 875 /hzmads after th nt or repair lop asald"turera y8 days jo� 4ulp�ant �o cOmpB'sealf onclme r Pa12 op nufacturoraledt Ste the watranty 1>�� RdYDyagAa m zranlors forlald h ndllnsmort them The above Stations eq named hrdwer �iSC =UT �acb- a°eaembll ea la, bfS011operated Into lndi vlAual wor4- °° CO 8?ZGUVATZOfl3 FIoppy Drive hS o 18eM s pC- With EColr ,p a e 6 rahlcs o nh c one+8eria 6mhS processor, t AQPter eand NEC ulti sync SGe EA0aaord, ASS splay unit. T EG y The Chi company October 9, 1986 The City of N Of 1842' "ODOanl For; ancho Cucamonga SECOND SRRIAL/ PARAL,;,RL C WWUICATIORS OPT101#2 Seven Of the Base Workotetiona require addition ° Serial end /or Parallel communlcat!ona simultaneous connection f A second local printer con °•' the computer to port i accommodate C010 the Prime system and DOT "ATRIR pRINTRR CDn'IGD{tATIORr Includes ttO Toshiba P -34I column Printer, speed, 72 cps "Near Letter Quality" speed, 21 tiro 81-di sectional Tractor teed, ' 180 one draft Print head and LRTTRR QOALITS PRIRTRR CORt]:GYIRATION, Includes the Print-head spinrclnd Sfnf column Deis Printer with de CPS 5 -part forma, sPeo,f a gle -B!n cut heel sheet feeder for AB PRIMR SRARIRGr betwo ©r; workstations requl.re that o single prfrtor b two computers or coemunicalions channels. ter elgnaxe. ,-sera to manually switch between ° shared Includes a two- n two aourcaa cf8 cvltcb poaf tion "AB" switch, printer ABC PRIRTRR �flARI6Ct Several workstations require that a single switch Permits three c.... r.. or communication channa; Permits caste Ptintoc •m shared ThO ABC Printer slgoale. Inc' to syoeltlont"een" s•on•rc.s Of A three- ttrco ABC rw;tch QDADRAy LAPRR PRINTER: Includes s, 50 sheet 6ad,000 dchoot, tet;9hat a pe o m pled. r:n lna fonts rhoor• s, at 9 / in, print n -Peed /out rasa with automaticIudoa 8 standard collutlon. 'he chi October g °mPen . 1986 4M3 LASilit P.QIIlms Encludea the The City SOf tRancho Cucamonga 9 no rated QMS Las MICCta, 188 sheet inefeed /s20 t throughput outhpute p "Ain. print '�NEOUS feed. odes 8 ata ndArd sPeld Includes �LYBa ._ their cables assigned for connec Printers, tlon of each of the es matwitch ba th ne to fnenae and w e°seicr ntyrves on all(ghtto select acged hardware , ven dor to provide CI IT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 16, 1966 TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. PulWood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval to redeem bands, publish and mail Notice of Redemption for nrapald assessments within the Alta Loma Channel : Asssstant District (64 -2) for approximately $166.000 00. RECOMMENDATION: Approval to ecm bonds, publish and mail the Notice of Redemption to Bof ]oldero reflecting 6166,000.00 of prepaid asoessments. EVALUhTIOH: Property owners have prepaid assessments within the Alta Loma Channel Assaasaent District (04 -2) totaling approximately 6160,000.00. A reduction In interest erpenso is realizahle within this district by redeeming outstanding bonds early. Respectfully submitted, Rio y" zo Ass ieta city Manager RAR:JBP:dm Attachment: Notice of Redemption 13/ NOTICE OF REDWTiOR TO THS HOLDERS Opt CITY OF RAECDO COCAMOHCA ALTA LOMA CHANNEL AS8RSSMENT DISIRICT 84 -02 ROME I8 HEREBY GIVEN that the Ci Cr of Rancho Cucamonga (The "Agency ") his called for redemption on July 29 1!860 9145.00a principal amount of the Agency's "City of Rancho Cucamonga Arta Loan Channel Improvement Bonds, Assessment District No. 84 -021• (the "8onds ") at the redemption price of 1052 of the principal amount thereof, plot accrued interest to the data of redemption. The Bonds to be redeemed are as follo"as Bond Certifleate Numbers Amount of Redemntl2n 121 $5,000 115 5.000 79 5,000 72 5,000 95 10,000 94 10,000 97 5,000 113 5,000 % 10,000 117 5.000 108 15,000 85 5.000 99 5,000 86 5.000 100 5,000 74 5,000 82 5.000 98 5,000 83 5,000 78 5.000 73 5,000 104 5,000 70 5,000 69 5,000 On January 2, 19870 the Bonds or portion thereof, designated for redeuption will become due and payable at the above - stated redemption price and payment vtll be made upon presentation and surrender at Bank of America National Trust std Savings Association, Corporate Agency Service Center, Bond and Coupon Processing, 55 8avtborns Street, 8th Floor, Sae Francisco, CA (if delivered) or P. 0. Boa 37109, Ban Francisco, CA 94137 (if oiled) or at its Corporate Agency Division, 555 South Plover Street, Sth Floors Loa Angeles, CA (if delivered). E; Notice of Redemption Page 2 Interest payable January 2, 1987, will be paid in the usual manner me presentation. From and after January 2, 1987, interest shall cease to seems on the Lands called fox redemption. All holders submitting their Bonds mast also submit a form B -9 in order to avoid a 202 back -up withholding under the Interest and Dlvidout Tax Coeplisace Act of 1987. Failure to provide a completed R -9 will result in a 202 back -up withholding to bondholders. The form R -9 may be obtained from the Internal Revenue Service. CITY OF RANCBO COCAN ®GA, CALIFORNIA Dated: October 29, 1986 33 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 18, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Robert Rizzo, Assistant City Manager BY: Jerry B. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator SUBJECT: Approval of loan repayment to the System Development Fund in the amount of $171,680, and replenishment of the Reserve Fund in the amount of $86,000 from the Alta Loma Chancel Assessment D1ntr1ct Capital Improvement Fund RECOMMENDATIO. Approval of loan repayment to the System Development Fund In the amount of $171,600.00 and replenishment of the Reserve Fund in the amount a- $65,000 00 from the Alta Loma Cnannal Assessment District Capital Improvement Fund. BACKOROUND: In February 1988, Cltf Council approved a loan Of $171,680 from the System Development Fund to the Alta Loma Channel Assessment District Reserve Fund. Debt extinquishment data was scheduled for fiscal year 1999 EVALUATION The Alta Loma Channel Assessment District Capital Improvement Fund has sufficient funds to ruoay outstanding loan of $171,680, and replenish the See•irva Fund In the amount of $66,000 for delinquent assessments. Receipt of delinquent assessments will initiato early redemption of applicable bonds. Respectfully submitted, Rabt %ert A /R4 AesletanT & ty Manager RAR:JBF:dm 3�1 GATE, 7,0: FROM: 81': SUBIEC Llnvflle 87 Proposal Year P, amino C17T OF 74,11" S AlFRR�''ZRT GA ��ber IS. 1986 Lfty Council and Cftv Lloyd g Hubbs, CI nAger 81ene H. Frandsen Engineer 9 : nHE !!AD IMPRave..,.. Llvf1 Engineer Su - "ossf- -° Fud. $- Inc, ues Taz mound, cost egl; 110i comparison zzPropose PROFEbSfoUx SERVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entere, into this 15th day of Oct)ber, 1986, between the CitY of Rancho Cucamonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as - CITY•) and Linville -Civil Engineers /Land Surveyors, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT'). A. Recitals. (1) CITY has heretofore issued its Request for Proposal pertaining to the performance of professional services with re spect to the preparation of Survey, Right -of -Nay Engineering, Soils Report and Plans SpeMfications and Engineers Estimate for Oase We Road irprovements, Archibald Avenue to the Southern Pacific Railroad cro.:sing ('Project" hereafter). (11) CONSULTANT has now submitted its proposal for the performance :%f such services. (111) CITY desires to retain CONSULT /YT to perform professional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning CenmissIOn, Ctty Council and staff in the preparation of Project. (iv) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualfff -d to Perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NON. THEREFORE, it is agreed by and bobrean CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: " B. A retment. 1• De11 ^moo ^5: Tho following definitions shall apD1Y to the ;.x following terms, except where the context of this Agreement otherwise .% requires: rt +, _ �YJ Engineer (a) Project: described l ^g, Soils Re The PreParat! limited to Exhibit o "Scopelof SeSPecfflon ooandaEnurve;•s ght_of -Nay 1lmf A Cations Rf t rvfc gfneers Presentation, � PraParatiom oP es attached Estimate as and do oral 60th oral and in fps' surveys rep 'YSet° including, but not Public is �u CITY g, of mops, as re "ling, plans and d0ctaaents, the hearings and other Sired and attendance surveys, Project as outlined in opp °tofgs conducted at lr and all wfrk sessions, orts be Performed (b) Sere cop Services• by Ctry with respect to the by CONSULT PrOfossiona) 1n Ord service Phases cP the (c) C )etfon of pro CO le the PrOJectas are necessary to Project, lncludi rot: The °aps. surveys, ng any date of and plan documents, Completion of all attendance and all Procedures by CONSUL reports technical reports development acceptance at , aketirt Plans, Public gs, oral Pres attached hereto. canatructfon fs set for bearings entat "orts regard project 2• CONSULTANT re tb I., Exhibit "g" PrOJecta� e a es as toll ul ProJect in e h usU)•T �° accordance =ha i1 forthwith undertake CITY with Exhibit 'A" satf statues, reguiatfons and aPPlica6le and c°mplet sfactfon Of Ctry• ordinance a the s and Wdelfnes, all with Federm)• State and reports, (bl CONSULT to the reasonable Plans 'W shall "documents ") fnc)udln documents supplemental copies fv Ys Exhir�#b (hereinafter col Or all maps, surveys g °i lee ve 1 00 cop -es to C1TY within th tentai technical cu my referred to as Exhibit qo Of the dOSmentsesha Spec fHed is Projectts' as described 1n CITY may the numbers Scheduled IYaft„r be in such Exhibit review and forward to as are ra9ulrpd by CONSULTANT CaP10pnts. r regarding said documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such revisions to sa4d documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in such form and in the antitie qu s determined necessary by CITY. The time limits set forth pursuant to this Section 02.(b) may be extended upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expense, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of ' CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persons ere retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTNIT hereby warrarts that such persons shall be fully qualified to perf.irm servic ?s required hereunder. CONSULTANT rurther agrees that no subcontractor shall be rerainod by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows: (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximim sum of $18,240.00 for the performance of the service; requir_d hereunder. This s,,t shall cover the cost Of all staff time and all other direct and indirect costs or fees, Including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made ire accordance with thx schedule set forth in Exhibit V. (b) Payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid vithin a reasonable time after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit °C' either with rpspert to hourly rates r; Jump sum amounts for individual tasks In no event, however, will said invoice: exceed 95% of inuividual task totals described in Exhibits "CO. _3_ 13 k v' required . (c) `O pay CONSULT hereunder prior to CONSULTANT a�s agrees that. supPlementa] rec'fpt b n in evcp In no eyent sha Apt PrElenvatfon oPTY hnF Ina I ..s 1 a escrfbef of nat document r, tto maxlm"m payable e final documonts payment shall be made herein acceptable etI wfth all set gnfo th in wrltfnydl bAddltIonaln.ervlcetance therpoPlbyer than 60 dyyfo� and 1n _ CITY • s P CITY, der eddfordance with tChef •A. hereof, a not fncfudeents for additional tfonaI se fee sch shall be the Sco serti�fco C17Y wfthln a paces shay) be fnv')e set fo Paind an a r<'�mbu se�of Services ass 4 sona0le time afterfced on ° monthly . ent bast. in C``a reps said Invoice y basis ands Charge. for hereto. (a) Info�atfon and!ast.tCONSULTAI Oe /T!'ecefyed byClryp paid by 1 tc an or cemple�iae the prf ecavailable, ohlch ht tally reProducl6, as set f h in la'hfbft .A„ t, CO3pSUt7 le copies nac s of of from l °s applicable te�thePrO Ctlnfor�tfOn as is gener s Maps er t`,,r 9CINSULTtgllT�sgrosrnraental a8eenncfesaane• if necessary ally available from CITY herin9 of, •uch Insofbility to mdpedal) Private Parties. • obtaining Info on Survey$. draw! Ownershy of fn1 tlal contact w! never' f t shall CONT Pursuant maps• mod hcument.c respect to the suant to this Agreement els photogia A)1 documents da •hail be cons, reports Per studies �+ eyed th Pared by BOB ,4�/;..... ° Property Of CITY ::�k ; c and, "Pon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, other identified materials shall be •lellvered such documents and t0 CITY by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the he CITY, its staff ff intended or a alteration by the or revision of the plans or specifications or authorized agents without the specific Witten consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the COIi.:ULTANT against all damages, claires ant losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration „ts. or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY , Its staff or authorized age 5. Termination: The ��• This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon giving of a written -Notice of Terminatlar• to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In the event Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT nhall be compensated at CONSULTANT's opplicable hourly rates as rata basis set forth in Exhibit 'C', on a pro_ with respect to the percentage of the da•a oP termination. In no event however, cempieted as of the the maximum specified to owever, zha11 CONSULTANT receive core man paragr -,,n 3 (a), above. CONSUL'iAIIT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, photographs and reports, whether in draft or final maps, models, Ppna, prepared b CONSULTANT as of date oo termination CONSULTANT Y Agreement oxcept for cause amy not tenainate this >• Notices and Desi Hated notices, demands, involc4s and written c Ne re,entativos: Any end all ^�m+nlcations between the parties -5- !'' 3 hereto shall be addressed as set forth In this paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be Uwse persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreement: Ke,meth N. Linville, President, for Consultant; 81ane N. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer for City. Any such notices, d:mands, invoices and writtei communications, by mail, shall he deemed to have been received by the addn ssee forty -eight (48) hours after deposit thereof In its? United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as set forth above. 8. Insurance: C04SULTANT shall neitht-, commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder In a compary or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained CONSULTANT shall take out and raintain at all tin : during the term of this Agreement the following policies of fncurance: (a) Worker'sCompensaton Insurance: Before beginning work. CONSULTANT shall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that It has taken out full workers' compensaton insurance for all persons whom it may employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified 'herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CIT° a certification as folloems: 'I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of m:he Lamar Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions -6. 1// a "IWAWAMW Of that Code, and I will Comply wi per•°raance oP the wort: of this such Provisions Agreement^ before cook.cfng the to (b) Public Of this Agreement Qabf)f shall peep, or caus, at CONSULTANT, and Pro ert Dame e; benefit se to be kept sole cost and Thra°9hout the oP CITY Pt, 1n full for expense, r liability and CONSULTANT ce and effect CONSULTANT Y and automobile !n , comprehensive, broad forim * for injury, death, or surance the mutual ng 6od11Yin Property Jury or death at One Mfilfo CONSUL activities, to any one n Dollars (SI,000, and at least One M{)lf Person or for 000. Million Dollars ($) 000 any one accident 00) for maintain (c) Errors and 00.%) for per °r °ccurronce all times %Is ns: Pr0 tY damage at t1 sio °f insur during the CONSULTANT shall ante con life of this take out and Protection concerning errors A9roement Of at feast nd omissions I a Policy respect S.S. f2S,000 for ( mal or Policies LO loss Practice ^) sarvfces arising f errors and omfsafons Providing hereunder from actions Of ( malpractice• on behalf of CITY CONSULTANT Performing with required b (d) al nni engineering ra Dener Y express Insurance 'responsible Provision of Ra ufrements: insurance tb!` A All Insurance California and COVanles r Agreement shall be Policies ice "sad to ca the only 1n additional insureds require d0 business d under Parag�phs 8. agents. CITY. f in the State Of 111 Polfcf is elected officials, (a) and (b) shat) name as (11 the insurer Wfn language, to the employees CITY'S elected exte and officials es the right "t obtainabio, to the are prior , officers °P sub'. O""an a Y and noncontributf Yees, and agents. galnst CITY and eMlO try; and (3) thgy cannot n9 with anv Insurancethat (p) she policies be cancelled or auterlaiT that may be Carried by Y changed except after r thirty (30 ) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified Shall furnish CITY with copies of all mall. CONSULTANT them, or certifica su_h policies Droe tl P receipt of to evidencing the fnsurance, P Y u on r P own account in :urance not required CONSULTANT may q ed under this A r Y effect for its g• Indemnificatlan; Agreement. save harmless CITY -- CONSULTANT shall Its elected defend, indcmn {fy and employees and loss, "Pointed officials, officers, from all liability from Toss, dam.93 agents and Property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of a or injury to persons or attorneys fees, in any manner W and all legal cos willful arising out of is and acts or Omissions d0Y negligent or intentional or of the CONSULTANT Agreement, including. In the din but not limited to damages, Performance of this maximum extent permitted p ' all consequential Y law, wages, to the 10• AssT nment: No assignment of this Agreement or of a or obifgation of performance hereunder shall be Part. 6 W Part Y CONSULTANT without the prior ode' either 1n whole written cons or 1n 11. Independent ant of CITY, CONSULTANT and its employers, The and hereto under This agree that Agreement agents art independent errgrloyeas of CITY and shad not be construed for any Purpose contractors be 12 Goveernina Law• coristrjed fn accordance with This Agreement shall be the laws of 9rverned by and 13, gttorne ' The State of California to Instituted s the In the evert enforce any term or any legal any Proceeding is and costs in said legal praceedfn9 shall be entitled a Agreement, the prevailing costs from the opposln to recover atto reascnable, g Party In an amount dete mays fees rnlned by the court to be I V3 14. Entire Are, ment: a er ag••e� ants, either oral Thfs Agreement supersedes ,qy ene al) to the subSect nytter herein. or 1n �itfng, be g representati Each men the agreement, sta � by a which to this �9repm,enta acks with respect Valid and bfndfng� ^t. or promise not contained not Cmbodied herein or ledges that 1f ft !s fn Writing fgrK,d ti alatfon cf this aAgra f mthly Agreement s ell Other b else shat? 1v as Of the IN WITNESS YMREOF, the Parties, be effect a only CJNSUCTANT ��' ar yr ryrtL sat rI'rthtaboveereto hays executed this Agreement er, �. %% o e CITY fffea rgerip:fy��1 s e^ OF ATTEST, Y, or �eTtt� e g. T Dote: 9 jo tv6 Un te: ADPreved as to farm t 1r tornCY 1, : r.. EXHIBIT 'A' Services All preliminary surveys for the design phase including center line control and stationing, vertical control and topography within the right -of -way and beyond due to grade differential Utility research and all necessary coordination with the affected companies, including meetings ano field reviews. Maintain a design file for all correspondence and submit to City at completion of project. Prepare plotted cross sections for existing and proposed improvements. Prepare improvement plans per City Standards for all missing ultimate improvements within the project limits, including two alternates at the northeast corner of Amethyst, retaining walls, driveway reconstruction, walkways at the railroad crossing, street lights, improvement repair and all existing Improvements and utilities Striping plan also to be Included. Structural calculations and design for retaining walls. Soils report and recommended structural street section and bearing value for wall footings. Prepare special provisions to be incorporated into the specifications. Right -of -way research and prepare legals on easement deed forms and deed plats for required right -of -way acquisition. Coordinate with Amethyst traffic signal designer 'or coordination of improvement plans and consolidating special provisions into one bid package. Prepare Engineer's Estimate. Field review existing 1mprivements for possible replacement as part of the contract plans Design of street light layout Attend meetings with City staff for project coordination. Attend pre - construction meeting and assist City in design aspect during construction phase. I Ir EXHIBIT "B" Time of Completion It is anticipated that the design phase of this protect and additions and revisions during plan checking procaes can be compieted in 12 weeks from the "Notice to Proceed The above time does not include City review time, PrinciPal,• 4/f _ tU`,` Offlce Fn91neer„ r echnlcfao genera) Offfe, I6.00�r, Surr'y .• ••$54.0 crr� 3.14 in n Sirryey rrew . hr• ..$34.00/hr. St sofruc urai �4lne ......., '•S1a.00 /hr, is Fn9ineerfn erin9 c9nsultan.. •s100.00 hr. Str fOfnO 9 consultant„ t s138.00 P)ana Not to /hr. Exceed. cost + !SY cost # Isr •.sla,z9p.eo GATE: TO: FRUM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CLlC,IMONGA S"AFF REPORT October 1i, 1986 City Council and City Manager ,loyd 8. Hibbs, City Engineer Gideon V. r,gra Engineering Technician lipps!thr -fl and thu tt Agreement between SeDastlano on 1's fronta92 1 r i y of Rancho constructfo3ve Cwamon Protect; a the Arrooso RO�utetHinthbe lncludeaaw {th the Of 11111 be paldpb� rite contributton iR,6 Stet l rovement 1 the Ftlpl's, °P MreP or loss RECOt"MATION It Is Ff lPI rcntag eT� ovemgo ovemeent Agr ,,,,,t or ttry attached Resolutlort Ft Frcnta Street Street project for the In conjunction with a construction of the p.tr•ticipatlon cost of with th , Arrow Route and more or less. Ninth the : The attached sub�ecl, Street I the Jnfnt effort and interest of the Pr Hinth Sticet t° Its uitimt.te paveaent width or Owner t Agreement calls for both vehicular and operty Owner and the City al I the area, Constructloneat��an mobfift pose of I, widen curbs and gutters, drfvewa g the cubjectspropert s storm damage within Pavements Y and travel lanes as frontage shall include Said /ui well as parking lane Avenues, �1; Route } Prglec•' that a scheduled tees Protect between Vineyard and Will be financed fir "Fiscal Year 8 "187 City Capital Archibald Res Om �A ti10 'sPproved Gas Tax /Systems Fund."ent Y subml ed, � y L811: ;aye Attachments STREET IHPROVEME;ff AOREMMT This Agreemont is made and entered Into this by and between the Cit __ y of Rancho Cucamonga, ,day of , 1986 w (hereinafter referred to as "CITY") and Sebastian, FS1pl and eMatthewoC. Filpon father and sun, Et. A1, as joint tenants (hereinafter collectively referred to as "OWt1Efl ") for the installation of certain public .mprovemelts including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, drive approach ate street pavements along a Portlun of Ninth Street in the City of Rancho Cucaman,a. A. Recitals (I) CITY has prepared plans and spaolflcationa for, and presently conteuplatas the installation or, public improvementa along Ninth Street from Vineyard Avenue to Archibald Avanuo, (the "Arrow Route and 9th Street Project" hereinafter in this Agreement), (11) OWNER owns that certain real property, identified as San Bernardino County Assassor's Parcel No 209 - 031 -721 said parcel is more particularly described as Parcel No. 1 of Parcel Map 4511, as recorded in Map Book 1, Page 17 and a portion of Lot "A ", Tract 2425 as recorded in Book 34, page 62, records of San Bernardino Caunty, State of Callforaia, which parcel is located at Ninth Street approzimaoly 380, East of Holes Avenue, which Property is within the limits of the Arrow A Ninth Project. (111) OWNER desires to participate in the Arrow and Ninth Project so as to contribute its pro -rata portion to the total cost, of the Arrow -Ninth Project related to street frontage improvements along OLNi�Rvs property located at Ninth Street (the "FIlp1 Portion" hereinafter), (iv) CITY is willing to Include the Pilpl Portion within the Arrow 6 Ninth Project upon the terms and conditions hereinafter act forth NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and OWNER as follows; " CI *Y shall Include the FI1p1 Portion as a part of the construction of the Arrow -Ninth Project and at ill cause publl,, improvements including otreet Pavements, curbs and gutters, and driveway approach to be Installed In accordance with CITY's plans and specification, therefor. -1- " 4 1/9 Z• OwnER gutter and driv raotuea costs tst t CbaY,acoinSnce �lth the terms this ent, CITY Parking approach S Incurred constructing f B lane pa Y°_ nd one half truting the curbs and Portion en ts, all Such con the cost The costa cons to contract missing attached Satiaete for such construction are as 40uld occur along ° estimated _ °g the Pilp1 3. ON,ycg agrees to pay to Improvenenta at $8 S87 Per the ulthln the City the estimated based 30 date of ezecu ated °a the bad amounts tlon coat recol vod b °f this agreement for gush Services made to CS ty at the Y the Glt Such costs are daalgnat, Olrector, or a eSUehucamonga Cl tY Bell CAtteojCct. pay o..IS shall n 1, writing. r.ddresa 'Son: Adm3nl3tr nullify °g• Pa11ure °r Pez'son as alive Y this contract In its n ret pRYment prior the City mcY uorkingS and receipt Sall rely to onatr of uctSon shat Incurred ruocio acou tin final construed. Oblll ngi t t of the Project 1 °' a tf expendSt eurtng' construction atBthe R11 be made for an8; utaorthe Ci CY for the addition P11 P1 Portion. so'd expenditures Binally Posted b to °r lack of In the event of orl on Y a•.rr;nr full ex unforeseen the tOVene0"lER green the ovnar aBto eCI17 PRYlau� wi thin SgO d*111 be Made. o A, agents, to grant conatr °ntl costr its elact, offlo action easements actors ouch leis, as rl8hts of officers, eauso the cooPletlon anti are deemed necossar 9 sad /or temporary 5 This Agreement the P11P1 POrtlen. / b/ CITY's C1t estatent 1' Engineor to the laws n the State ofaCalifornlaavOrne,1 by and construed !n Soeor 6 the event Banco With Provision of this any legal proceeding is shall to Agreement, the lnstltut entl tied Prevail! ed to ofnrce any term or °n amount t0 recover III Party in Said 7 Snla tcrminod by I'a court toys tsee and cc IS from legal ther rOCe ying Agreement be reason thn In Parties successors hereto tassign','t0 La 1p respectl vod heirla, Insure to Lhn benefit Of the the context reQulres or adzIta. edminlstrntori, -2. 8. This Agreement supersedes any and all other a6reements, whether oral or In writing, between the parties -with respect to the subjcct mattar hereof Each party to this Agreement ackncwledgea that no rapresontetion by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement or promise not contained in this Agreemont shall be valid or binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in a writing signed by all of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHOHrA CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporatior BY; Jeffrey D. King, Mayor ATTEST: Eevorly A. Authelet, City Clerk 1 S/ As PROPERTT OWNER Sebastiano Filpi Matthew C Filpi •r c / � l APPROVED AS TO FORM: / CiGy Attorney 5 PROPERTT OWNER Sebastiano Filpi Matthew C Filpi •r c / � l APPROVED AS TO FORM: / CiGy Attorney 5 <�cc woi >� Cl7y OF RANCHp CUC �. of = `''"', 1 =rclrr • c A..'ONGA Z: ctZN DEi.Vi2?L�,Y., C: i 1 COST E.STZ,,, Sebail 209- 031 -71 Dace; stiano Fi1P1 Et ey. Al - 9-86 .40. Matthew C Filpf esrg, 1 P c C Curb and Gutter p X 24" Df1� =r1'I. 2 '^/1 c.0 DrT ve 340 Sp Y UNI7 g7ZT_ '."' re ate Base fncl ch /Co C` '^ mrterc ial (W'35') 378 t F. 19 JS $3.319 gp0� 4 C Pavertgnt rep of subgrade 13E I S F I3 50 5 kxcavatfon 15) ion �l2 0012 1828 00 00 - 6 (, I 828 Ibravel urfveway. 27' Ton F7 5012 Y 2.186 35 703 Y. 5 00/2 I S.F 0. 680 00 r� 50 __ RESC'UTION N0. �L g S C RESOLLTION LI THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Or , •„ CITY OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEHEHT BF:iNEEN Nj}l'0 CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMplm,4 AND SEOASiAGRE AND 813 EN FILPI FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET FRONTAGE INPROVD;6N s Ca 1lPOrnla, has ofo se City Council of the City o;+ Sebastiano and its consideration an agreement Rancho Cucamonga, referred to as Matthew the City father and executed by and W frontage faprevements ond the esouthslQe of Moth Street fo fthe I collet:tivof y of Rancho Cucamonga fo^ the InstallafAon of Of Heins Avenue. approximately 33U' east WHEREAS, r desires Hryrovemen s nconJunca with the that Gee City Arrow Rout,!-Ninth Street between Vlneyardta's ProJe t Foistthet Improvement nd WHEREAS, rchibald Avenues; and Incurred In one ha f the c agrees to pay to City the actual costs to be Portion and one half the the improvements that 1n ld occur on Aye � fr3nting said property; and Owner s 5 Parking lane pavements th is as part of the ab'uve the noted D o)gr eable to have such I mpravax?nts constructed NOM, &. California, BE 77 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califo that said Agreemen• between Cucamonga and Sebastiano and Hatthew F11the pf for the installation of street frontage ae, improvements be hereby approved and authorize the Hayort to f execute S3 U J", CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAhfONGA S7"AFF REPORT DATE: October 15, 19a6 TO: City Council and City H:nager FROM: Lloyd 3. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering T chnician SUBJECT: Approval of Tract Maps 12002 and 12802 -6 located in the Terra Vista Planned Cnermmity, submitted h; Lewis Homes RECOMMENDATION It is recamxnded that CitJ Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract Maps 12802 and 12802 -6 and au:horiring the City Clerk to cause some to record. Tentative Tract Map 12BU2 was approved by the Planning Commission on Frbruary 13, 1985, for Me division of 41.5 acres of land into 221 lots In the Terra Vista Planned Commmity Development District. Tracts 12802 and 1 ?902 -6, Improvement Agreements and Security were approved by City Council on February 5, 1986. The tracts as approved were not recorded. Tl+e developer Lewis Hams of California is rest° sitting Tracts 12602 and 12802 -6 for approval at this time. *1e,,t1ut1S1y sumitted, 0 f i RESOLUTION N0. M.,.-D24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL HAP OF TFACT N0. 12802 AND ;2802_6 lots, submitttedsb the Tentative Map o} Tract No. 12802, crosfsttng of 221 Vista Planned Comcunitis Hanes of Calit'ornta, Subdivider, located in the Terra said Subdivider ar;d y has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by Act of the State ofa^ulsved by said City as provided in the ;ubdivisien Map 0- dlnance No. 28 op said Cfornia, and in Compliance with the y; and rtqutrenents of for dedicat on4forsPublicbusaithe streets delineated thereon. Pproval slid Final A'nP offering Now. WEReFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. as follows; 1 That the offers for dedication and the Final Hap delineating same be approved and the City Clerk 1s authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. _uF.> :r MA .ow,�s aa! C 1 I KeGro m w aaq -♦ � Ib roaot 1 1 Heo lase 1 t -„ 1 IA lo t^ t a == 1 Swi � /Man/ ' �✓ II`�� as ACT b'sal99 VI 1 I ., UNDCR AIRCQL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINZM=G DIVISION S6 N� +viy�s�a�! : TRACT 12602 CITY OF RANCIiO CUCAMONGA 57 MUL. 7T17Fa TRACT 12802 -6 err: ✓ -,. 1 8 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 15, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SOBJECr: Approval of Parcel Map 9487 located on tho west side of Maven Avenue between Gjurch Streat and Foothill Boulevard submitted by Brunswick Corporation ' RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached .•esolution approving Parcel Map 9487 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Parcel Nap 9487 was approved by the Planning Cemnls5ion on December 11, 1985, for the division of 8.97 acres of lard into 4 parcels in the General Commercial Development District located on the west side of Hagen Avenue, between Church Street and Foothill Boulevard, improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit Issuance. *lelectlo y su Sa a r % j` a�l 7s r a,• >•, t :.rr .1yY e: I� I Q,. G I RESOLUTION NO, g(, _ a S 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI, OF THE rITY OF RMCiO (4 MJMBER (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO 9487) 9487 CorporatlWHIREA ' Tentative Parcel Hai) Number 9487 Avenue, between consisting of 4 parcels, located on the °fitted b 14 of Tract 114 8uashrecorde�a�� Book of west side ofnswtck sold County was a being a division ofaLet Cucamonga. and approved by the Planning CamoissionPofe 199 Recards of 4Y of Rancho land approved �'shown oln said Number entative Parcel ryfinal d of P the division of NNEREAS p' approval oP the flnalimaOfpy the City a ncil established as City have n'M T hunt. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT een e Rancho �l'La RESOLVER by the City Is ho,eb, 'i0n9a, California, that said Parcel Map Number ugggj be and the same County Recorder to and e filed for of the City of Y Engineer is authorized to present same to the record. I J, 57i i i V V 1 / CITY OF RCHO CUCAMONGA :;' , ' ��IIVa DIVL9ION i Voute.i•tJ ^tt! t Y:• ~a� 5 psi .,l t a a I q etou:Yfj. ! rMen h /� t t i !it rues r00tMlll •OYuyI MO Y D t —Atli t Tma. PARCEL MAP 487 (�O sey Ii a DATE: To: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: RECOKIEHOATIO11 -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT c ftP a, October 15, 1986 0 0 City Council and City Manager Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer 19.7 Linda Be_k, Engineering Technician Approval of a Subordination Agreement for 9260 Migronette, submitted by Daugherty L. Butters, Mona F. Butters and Qernerd Cleo Qaughorty It is recommended that City Council adopt the .ttar w resolution approving the Subordination Agreement, submitted by cte 8ntters Nona F. Butters and Bernerd Cleo Daugherty and aathori: City Clerk to sign same. - Yam ind aA Lien agreexnt was approved by City Council on March 4, 1982 ndsalong Mignonette for Street adjacent to 926DSM gnonette, improvements upon the Lein Agreements ben subordinate toilelnsj In favor ofnthe endar. that Respectfully XSUDWIK01tt, LBM: :diw Actachnients 4i Ei R t L. J t i k1 ,a r SusciniNATION AGREEMENT NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMCNT RESULTS In TOUR SECURITY THANRTHE LIEN OF SOME OTHER EORCONING LATER SUBJECT SECURITY INSTRUMENT,PRIORITY THIS AGREEMENT, /!t ay eel &t") 1T,.1R� by e e fp` owner o e u uelnal ter des cr a an ran no or n erreu to at 0rner' ae0 the City of Rancho Cucamonga hernlnafter referred to sa C1tYY', owner and her I, after referred certain as 'Lin Agreement reed Lln Agreement WITNESSETH THAT WM,F REA S. N�1 t Cmtoa t aM ua Awreeaant dated prrh'�7§d2 _ corertn9: la,"I R of por<al Hap 5159 as reootded Le foot 30, yea, at throe, Hope orn-lal reoorda of coo bamudlao to Se[uri Lpr9!seetm ou N vmatte at. at e.ld n bj 7jjZT�1 Which as scow R Records of Sato Coun y; an WHEREAS, owner hse erecutad A deed Of trust and note in the sue of not Ig_L'.Jrd 67+ 000 M to favor of Oat of hereinafter a n errs o ms m., er pty a e v n area an upon the terms ncarded iconcurrently f harar7th;iaod welch dead of trust Is to be WHERI,AS, it is a condition precedent to making said loan that be end eemsinf trust last above a lion oor charge upon t the , land AerelnbHOn described, prier and Superior to the tin or charge of the Lien Agreement; and WHEREAS. Lander Is willing to make said loan provided the deed of trust securing the seed is a lien or charge upon the above described property yrfor to Superior to the lid" or cl`arge of the Lien Agreemant and provided that City will specifically and unconditionally subordinate the lien or charge of the Lien Agreement to the Ilan or charge of the deed of• trust to favor of Lender; and WHEREAS, It .tual bnarlt of the parties hereto that tender modify Salo en to owner= and City is Wilting that teem deed of trust Securing the sano shall constitute a lien or charge lien or,charge which It LiCa Agreement 11Y prior to sop nlor tO ,t M, NOV. THEREFORE, In consideration of the mutual torefits securing to the parties hereto and other valuable consideration, the; receipt and swlfiatncy of which aonsfdn ation IS ha ebY acknowledged, and in order to induce Larder to modify the )loan +nova referred toe it 11 hereby declared, urderstood and agreed as follows. b (1) That said dada of trust fecnrlls r e rote In saver of Under and any renewals or utentlo 4% tberaef, shall uncondl:f onally be +nb remain a't all times a Ilea or charge an the property tocsin descr Ibed prior and Superior to the lien or char" of the Llen Agreement, 1 m ''F' •t�.�er i i, ii 1 J 1 ,c tt :C �5'•Lii y (I) That Lender 'Cold not make Its loan &bore described without this Subordination agreemart (�) T = =• •^ agratent %hit. be the whole and Doll a raement with regard to the Subordnation o1 the 1 an or charge of the Lien Agreeent to the lien or charge of the dead of trust I. f &vor of tender above r6farred to and shall su;erstde ono cane 1. betweenlstwi dead' of as would and iLien Agrrwiant priority prior apreaments me to such subordination Including but not limited to, those provisioos. SAY. for nt the d subordinationn which ch ar pa thereof to another dead or daa Is of trust or to ono pier wart paIa or mortgages The City Declares, aa•Rts AAA &cknawledgee that, (a) Na consent& to and approves ati provisions of the note and aaoJ o/ trust fn favor Of Lander above re erred to by that cartel,, modification aIreamtnt dated (10 b AAW .ie 1 , of ..) and Lander, (b) NO Intentionally and unconditionally waives, relinquish@, and eebardinates the Ilan or charge of the Lion Agreement In favor of the Ilan or charge DOOR said land of the dead of truer in favor of Lender above referred to and ,,ode's tends this waiverreliance elloqu �fLand In and consideration ion specific tans and advances are being and will be made and ee A Da•t and parcel thereof, specific ednetary and other Obligations are being and will be antere3 Into rhlch wool' not be made r- entered tn:o but for uId reliance upon this waiver, ra llnqulshment and Subordination; and (c) An andorsoment his been Placed upon the Lion Instrument been Suoerdinated pto eth� ti to his by charge If the data Of trust in Aver of Lender harm referred to. ALLOWS THEI1IPERSON SUBORDINATION 06LGATED ONEEYO YOUR CONTAINS PROVISION SECURITY 1TO 011TAIN A LOAN, A POETION OF WHICH MAY DE IS? . FOR P RTC OTHER TYAN INP /A'OVEMEpNi OF THE LAMP. '—Can• — "�lir6a -- ALL S(ONATUAIS f DE NOTARIIED u r 2 e .ti i r. i A ne '� 1 RESOLUTION N0. 3( -a g g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM STEPHEN L. DAUG BUTTERS, MONA F. BUTTERS AND BERNARD CLEO HERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME the Installation Of offs to street improvemeentsoalorgtmlgnneLien AWa(leapnreved 25, City 19 2, Inst umentt No.March 8-102546, 902 and recorded in San Bernardino County on May acrd WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project. the lender requires that the above - mentioned lien be subordinate to tha lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordinate Agreement effect for the City's approval and execution. to that NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of tho City of are Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Subordinate Agreement be and the some SubordinationaAgreementan n ,behalfaof the her by Ranchol ed to ongs, andst ie City Clerk attest thereto. !A: CITY OF RANCHO CUCUIONGA ST"F REPORT DATE: October 15, 1986 O1 MA TD: City _ouncil and City Manager FROM: Lloyd S. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract 12952 located east of Haven nw_a.a, oast of Deer Creek Channel and south of Highland Avenue, submitted by Glenfed Development Corporation REC01MEROATIOr4 It Is racemmendedl 952 the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract authorizing the Mayor and City accepting toiflgagreement ed agreement sand rto cause said map to record. and Tracc 12952 was approved by the Pl.nning Commission an April 9 DevelopmentonDistr District located e5st7 Of Haven Avenue,wp tiof Deerdential Res Channel and south of Highland Avenue. Creek the Developer, Glenfed Development Corporation, is submitting an agreement and a Savings pass Book as Security to guarantee the construction of tho off -site improvements In :he following amounts:* Faithful Performance Security ine 4 - =,n Off -Sites y $209,000 $950,000 Labor and Material Security Copies of the a re 5104,500 $475,000 9 ement are available in the City Clerks's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and element i ary school di and Cucamonga Counry Water Of strict. C. school l d ttorney. C. &R. s have also 0 ., , �.. rt, y6 7 . t -_` �7' �,v°'"� �� � ' �J _ten � � -= ___ `'- i�� -.. 3 •�i . � h i '. ib . Y ��� �i i i' �\ �P .�� �� �� �_ ',:U � ' W O �� � � � �„ :�4 � ; � as i � . 1 Ar tT' 'f:, ;U' -� ±�. ���i CIHIROyEMERA�I AGRECEN;NIGI FOC 1ntoKHgn cone Eh DT TRACT' 12952 CIHE 4P State of Caiifo l co with �RESEHTS; Th �Rit DRAM hereinafterCaliforniaa°o of therovlslonst f this ha9reement hereinafter referred to °a asJthePaItcorPoratlo ninancesjnfsfan flap Act ed And enter as the OaveloPer, and D1enPed peyelbetween Csorpora nc4e Bald mj ' AWEREAS sold MITHESSETH; 12952; and shown o Develo n tho co yftion,11y td develop . ve OPehAa- said Cit Y aPProved sb ertAin real Pert east cf Haveo,PwrestQof itos to aPPro�nal certefn re dfvis Pro ct er known as T a In folled"�� nIEREFORE, 1t snhereby aCha,,nelf South su Hlvf 9enee m t o d nts 1, 9ree b ghland, 1 located fmPravemerne by Y said City a toted to effects s descrlb her and by said Developer ve dot° hereofed on eDpager6s here"nstruct 2 as e du Thfs agr Within at Developer o� eS on =4 d�Cit ssp all be effective tMe)vn monthsexf'�e aIt hereoPtlemo DVepta Of time has beenrgranomm�etUrs °rysdateementishall °f the 3, tlon foepstabeforerequeSt sillirbeusut an extenslo Y said Cityfasaherein ftai therein costMest sProvin9ithodextefns/orojfofthe City 1 to complete fis if an fnate fsidns of and n Writin to the te, Y sub . and �ro�his time, contain less h stantiai change has Occurred�tY, and The tdinq thshal sh�attof this 4' 11 the Oevelo eVelsIOnsemo - the Per fails during then reCUfre ad tructlon Cit Developer and / Or hises�byya helfulfA ethrssright °"�Iawltheh nereofJustments 5, develop�,me Developer l cost and and there tfine tor0a siOn$ oP 166uc n9a County accordaotstrf to vthe rsgelat wa•cPeservice ntaaretlecoverc fry s[F,e -- Hater irns, schedules, °Andh lot of said DI Vantur u/ _' Encln °� CA 91436 evard fees of the B• the DeveloPer shall ue cot removal construct,- e°: rc°�oonont of any responsible for and tf.o owner of such i or , Irrigatiosatjtreplacement, water loots to the satisfaction t^ Confli relocation • or Drawings and StemlAtsd squired with approved to be ^ oP the City r,�gineor Page t h dtedno� ^ Pt lePeCtuct1o10ne of the Cit Sand Conform the lt0 the Standard Page B hereof, as t fn the °ff1; Other DeI O the Constr other Per shat] aken from thenland Bond Y Enofneerr, S I work Estloat , id I nt k b 6e resPOnsf�rOyQj"ent Plans reb Said lmpe o �ntn shall�be u`faco beyond the a for listed y /nCOrParated ° corrected inagd, tract boundarfesctIon of an tr' by number. to said elan upon thaEdiOrs °r as Y transitions or d9ree+ae•$t and stewdiftcations shallon°0 ltheoCftdiscoverea durinor safety and ed by the sur be covered 6 Engineerr0y1s1onconstrictln B• Construction etY covLrfn9 the orf the Re"ised k thereon of the Cl, P °rmlts shat, ed due eon shall Y Engineer be obtain the plannrd works f this P 01 ublic dust, i1o1 be ooserved, It all '0 start of by the shall utilities oandthOr. nufsancottentfon work; all Oevetoper shalt be subject to Y ulsar glvan to safet regulationsrOm tie the it, tmeto the area, and to y Procedures listed P..naltigs ProvidadFtheref to c ^,�lY with tnisatlon of othe9�debr{sDeve1 °Per -,y: ;l be re therefor, resulting from from public sPonslbl inls section work event of °^' Cft all Too P )eti cork the shall S streets inc,rred {romu tb fled do )pay an� /tMPl right nd to late vetY and at111 worksued to e Developer 11, Said Is co, a said easements D1. Oper shall at actor b a %1 cost and Czn the work or / said subidivlsioni tim°s P Y any lawful 'deans. Pense to thn traveiin°rov ollowln9 dedication aP the street r easemenPublic not the C give '0)etlo or dangerous conditions, ^ and scce streets be Perfo c on Protect the travelfng Public f r existentiIn $a,, Until tho °dpach of Public from such dcf sat the charg edfeach of saidlst easOvw nts as In on �t1v. and street said Deyelo herein Permit. "sued subject to thaPer, Oavelo accepted adorn orated page 7 Oublic during the the CftY Engineers contained /a Closealltorshall be under Devi Per Parkway ctroe5uctlon of the lmpro ements herein to P ottclosu e i after other required to ^ agreed to be ect the ccm ted the plantin Piantin9 shalifb °rdb ^t worj, Planted shall be made, 9 dlagrma approved 6 as City Cded bydOrdinand Planted Y the In 4CCOrda Y the Cit omnunity a ve /oPment Directors with - 68 The Deveioper shall be after health until tsh end of responsible for malntafnl ^g all the planting, whichever is later, maintenance trees planted In Scot by t he Th e Developer is Per or for he t Y Pursuant to responslblo for one J'ear agreement for the development the Subdivision pro meeting constructed there Dm�e ^t t all conditions establ / shed the ftauchrd 0° improvement thenfmprovementmtllntenarnf�a otdiances, and this before Council acceptance unless security Provided accepted for it imProvements Of the City, °the herelnwith maintenance b arise Provided au;Dorizedl by the City 11 14, This and De released security hereinaagreement ter escrl6eJ not terms ^ate until torthee {ty together with the required eleased p Council y a successcr t e {n r Y the maintenance guarantee LY therefor acre tede herein namedn anj ti r1tY ihas beennsuw SPCurf been p a new is. The I has been rifled. ,and this agreement resolution mitted agreement sha)imPonsf_ert security to and the improvement the � City Attorney, st of the following and nshall be innaDeveloper with this 1• 1 bond secure faithful performance agreement orm acceptable by the form an bonds Y one or mar °f this 2, 1; tmprOvementontent sveciffedeDduly author Corporate Se 3• A deposits w1eh°rney Instrument 1n the Fo Code ectlan 664991e. in B, approved the Cit '7m and content Spoof 7o secureflahorcuring deposit money or negotiable o, 1• A bond oe laborers and materia)of Public monies, DOnds f the the form and content one or bdul Corporate kind 2. more by 6e Citment Securf yec1fledmby .. erthorizedy sureties 1n 3• A deposit Y Attorney. nment a Section, 66499,2 with CftY of the form and content A cash. u in9 money °r negotiable specified 'he engineer oProsit with the City bonds of the kind the settin surveyor whose ertfguarantee Payment aPProved Ind for fu9n fal l boundary , lot car icate a by the deposit 9 centerline appears upon Developer to MY be an tie noses to street can Final map for accep tab)o y amount Line np shall be payment in full; orer`lffed by thee City , amount°uments as shown on the Tf n,• en9lneer he CanstructfOn znd Sondir sub of the Said cash milted surreyor as receipt b deposit Estimate contafnecash bond Y the Cft may be refunded as Payment in full rr y Of the centerline soon as Procedure herein. D. the required am the engineer o- surveyor. and writtenp tsmruranceter bonds a surveyor. °r' Page 6 of this agreementnd the Principal amounts thereof are set forth on 16. The Developer warrants that the agreement shall Le free from defect., in materials and warkmans ibe M all portions of the i'�Provements found to be defective improvements described in this fo)l� ing th. data on which the is found -C aired or replaced b ,, defective within one y and Deveio er Y velaper freee of aallacha teed by the City shall be P shall furnish a maintenance guarantee securl{ percent (10X) of the construction estimate to -s to the City. The to secure the faithful Parformanc, of Developer. 2M. Yin a sum equal to ten this paragraph. �. whichever is faithful parea The maintenance gaerantee s obligations as described specified wor. wILh respectDeveloper of ,;, st�Qat� shall also secure the Once the 1 P v °blf of 4he has been a Ce�vLed °bs thee been accepta±kand as "'terance assessment °district this agreement Y City, the other Improvement guarantee a,'thorized by the 514dfvt ton released provided tat release described itn A Act and any applicable el otherwise Il• That the Developer shall take out and malrtaln such Ordinance. and That damage insurance as shell subcontractor performin� wart C0Y Public 11ab111ty Property dame , covered Protect him and any contractor operations under this- ag arisephecauseb °} this the agreement fr or any contractor or subcontractor naturu am Claims for said such operations to b e work or from said peso s even though such dame a ^Yone directly or. fid1� Y himself or by Persons. any contractor or gas be not caused by the negligence Toyed by Cft as The Public liab111t subcontractor or anyone of the and additonal Insured and directl rotect the City, employed by said employees, Property damage Insurance shall list the subcontractors as well as the Developer, his Y. Its afflcers, agents The minimum amountsdoflsurhslnsuranCeoshallsbesas foijoNS. °der shall contractors and his A. Contractor's Se state. liability limits oPiaotilty insurance than $500 Pruvldln for each accident or occurrence .DO for each ally injury or death not less than $250,000 for and ro Property damage el1ab/11t $i'0�'0� limit of f500 ,e for Claims each which ay [arise from nce with an limits Developer in the pperformance ofhthe work Of 8• Automobile liabilit the operations of the performance of this Y insurance cove�lneln Provided not less than 500,pj 18 V• " • spec' the C1t before th b recludi ':fnsuragcecerttflcaietfon of thf Y such ace eAn - each or c s agreement et ations� orsuch certlffcates the Oe9e red �a7ferhave recefv�b �if the exOfrctfon fnccoeV shall lntiraoceopeovShall ffl Of Coup Trement sesame Standfn9 the or bytire9fsteredty�»0)fdaDpa af end, 9 the ter td eenc the tY, and asdafffxedVhisosj 9naturedheretoefollowing f fntent to described .,e v Type: FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE Principal Amount: Name and address of r Y: Glendale lendal $209,000 e Federal Savings Pass Book Type: MATERIAL AND LABOR PAYMENT Name and Principal Amount; address Of Surety; Glendale Federal Savings Pass Book $lOQ,Spp Type: Name and address of surety: Type: Name and address of surety: MR DEPOSIT MONNFXTATION Principal Amount: Glendale Federal Savings Pass Book NAINTENAMCE GUARANTEE S 9,800 Principal Amount: 10 BE POSTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY TAE CIry IN WITNESS HEREOF, le duly executed and ackn Parties hereto have caused these dates set forth o ledgedwith all formalities Presents t0 6e Pposlte he "r gnatures. required by law on the Date q S ` by $r. V na ure Developer PAn tea — Date �u Y gn re Developer Accepted; r n e '� City of Rancho Cucamonga, a m n'cipal corporation By: Attest: Mayor City Clerk Approved: �— City Atto•ney DEVELOPER'S SIGNATURE IkIST 8E NOTARIZED AND COMPLETED IN TRIPLICATE r r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' ENGINEERING DIVISION ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE For ImPrOvement: Tract No. 12952 - 4P Storm Draln Date: Se temper File Re erence: 986 ompute City Drawly• 9 Ho. MUTE: Does not Include current fee for °9 fxrnit or Pavement deposits 874 L'F' 60• RCP 2000 D) PRICE AMOUNT =T EA 4 EA 5" P.CP 1500,0} Desilttng Basin 96.00 91.00 49 248.no EA. Manhole. Junction 25,000.00 4� Si �O m57! 0 00 EA. struct•re Outlet structure, 2000.00 5000.00 8.000 00 ' 7000.00 5 000.00 ' 00 RESTORATION %DEL NEgTTjoNECASH 8 985 D EPOSIT q ._.e0� 0 FUNDA94E) SUB TOTAL CONTINGENCY HQVUMEHTATION SURETY (CASH) R FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE 113 78 6 00 A ��_ BOND LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND (lOC1� (501) r =4' 209 000.00 �iO4 5— p Bernardino County CodeaTitlos,�cChaptersul�5ipa1 y Code, B be made prior Title Z. Chapter 1.0.7, to issuance of an Engineering ' a ash restoration /delineation Construction adopting San Revised 3/84 Permit, de Posit shall r CITY OF RMCM COC4WI IMPROVEIifI(T AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 12952 into. K lnW conformance mance M With the provisions That this agreement State of California, Pr °visions of the Subvisi n Mae and entered Cucamonga, California and of the applicable Ordinances of the City of the hereinafter referred t ° a�nlcipal corporation, b Y of Rancho hereinafter referred to the City, and Y and between said City, as the Developer, Glenfed Development Corporation WITHESSETH: THAI, WHEREAS, said Developer desires to develop 1215 City as shown on the conditionally approved subdivision known 12952; and P certain real property 1n WHEREAS, said C:t as Trait Developer as Y has established certain requirements east of Haven, pwest gofsiterto approval of said subdivisions to be Creek Channel generally °y said south of Highland, y located folloNOW- THEREFORE, It is hereby agreed by said City and by said Developer as 1• The Developer hereby agrees to construct at Developers expense all Improvements described on Page 6 hereof within twelve affective date hereof, months from the 2, This agreement shall be effective on the date of the resolution of the Council of said City approving this agreement, This agreement shall be in unless tannextension of ti te9 the been granted anniversary date of ! pprovai provided, me has been sad a by said City as hereinafter 3• The Developer may request an extension of time to c hereof, Such request shall be submitted to the of 1n 30 days before the expiration date hereof nApiece the terms right ces nethesititinions of this aoreementlh 11 contain a statement e than 9 the extension of time, The City shall have the therein if art, ost astUaate, and Improvement securi^' including the construction •bstantial change has occurred during the totrequihereof. us 4• If the Developer fa/1s or adjustments Dthis agreement, the City shall have egthetrig COmPIy with the provisions of eveioperland /or his surety helfulllco means, and at an and thereuponfrecover cause said the 5• the Developer shall provide expense incurred, development in accordance with the rreegulationser service to each lot of said Cucamonga County Water District. schedules, and fees of the :r 16601 Ventura Boulevard Encino, CA 91436 7V 6, rema all V41 �e Oev and thectla" of c0tsnenshall be ' Owner ofSuch fMd�f�+provanYrjYrt °Stble for Dr a drOVOments water system nts togtheon gaterePlace nt, are tab approved St r sattsf system rel ehe DeveTreofnaso heft let the ofFfce o0 S r.,cted shalctlon the Cftylfng with Pr pe, lncfde�tsh411 ta)Sn fray ctf °n any °f the city an can Canf0 ■11 4ree�dtsie ��moyfpHobe fd .theot� b CO Std clef nd her; ?on aid nun ■ "-YE so ee �evel0 k4rn� Sal vo' P in n fn _sale 'O_ the ._or Unti ° °' °ctfve be l the he chforNca"IDletlon Perm, tr° to S f said of Pub I f� ,d°r {n9 d by ith 0 Y to- -' the otheees re9ulr 19 Shalllb roveMe to aPProved b h d the the surel 11 ba f thews dlseo erm cov eltdr�hdllc�ering the 0 b the eel ifSor o an Ottentfo Start tof ed by P �Par°Q to the 91ven tMOr }. all a at$ tie 5 Provided ltiluI and to Proper erefor. caTV y r.r to a1) loose . 9 said deyel ps and t - all Oh ..er/ be ie s Ory s a Partial t )) re 0 be made. be , ' The Developer shall be r health until the esPOnslble for maintaining all trees after planting, whichever isPlateranteed maintenance period In good Planted The Devele or for one year by the City Pursuanteto s responsible for agreement for the deveto the Su%dlvisfon Map all COndltln constructed thereunder u ttlnithend for P Act• City Ordlancese5andlithls the City, and no 1 the maintenance before such d n t Ile securmprovement is accepted all improvements Council of the ponce unless otherwise Provided n for Maintenance by City. Provided and auth shall be released 14, and authorized by the City security is agreement shall not terminate until agreement her9etheret with the ulrobeen released by it a maintenance greement to with the to the City by a successor to 4 Improvement guarantee Council same has b the herein na0L security has beennsubmf security therefor has been creleased.and thfsed. and by resolution submitted I6. The o agreement and the improvement to be thee City Attorneyins'tnOfstherfollowing ndnshall by the Developer with be In a form acceptable is secure faithful Performance of this agreement. I. sureties ar bonds by one or more dui Section 66499.1. form and content y authorized Z' An Improvement specified by Govern ent tae specified b Security Ins ru, and Cade 3 A de y the City Attorne ment in the form approvediforts the City of mono °d content B. to secure securing deposits of or negotiable bonds of 1 laborers and materialmen: Public the kind A bond or bonds monies. sureties f99the form and cnntemor duly authorized corporate 2. Section 664 An Improvement Security y Government Code 3' specified by 1theCCit Y Instrument in Y Attorne the form approved for securing Of money or bonds and content C. A cash deposlt with the to negotiable bonds the engineer or suave or of the kind for the sett in y whose cer[1f1e��epay'ment by the Develo monuments and for f all boundary, lot cornerpaars upon the Final Mao amount of the depo itnmahing centerline and street centerline surveyor as acceptable y be any amount tie notes to the City, The the cash bond shall be apsaayshhcwniunfull; Otertifted by the en contained herein. the Conitr ctfanaand rs submitted, Said cash de Jond Estimate receipt by may be refunded Of payment In Cit Of the centerline Loon as Procedure permits after fully from the engineer or surveyor." written n assurance %6 n. Page of th bonds gg of this agreaand the orincfpal amounts thereof are set far folll Por ent tia n aof tithe reerfro°i defects I the improv forth on rePairedg the data on'nVrOv�ents found "tmaterials and e1Aenlsr described fn Developer shall which th Developeerrrovaments be defective within ho P• M }•td�a Percent (1 free of to secure the 0P the constr�i"tenance 9uarant all chapges by the `Y sha 11 be aithfulragraPhfaltnei Lerfonnance oftimate 0reEs curitY into sum the City, Onceithed work w/td re tie Develope9uar�teePer•s obOjOfgattocheveerresu9reatton his been —v --e is have06een any Parkway mafigatfo� of °ohealsodsecunedth" agreement by the Cft accepted and ntenance ass, Developer to e authorized 6 md' be released the other i ° at ten ssment district Y the Subdiv {lion Map tree a ^fed that v "t recur decrfped tty 17 That the Develo and property d Per shall PDlica6le C1t Is otherwise any a rOPer Madam Pe f9"� ^9urivork as a e ut and Y Ordinance• OPerati ages which ma maintain such an ons under this Y arise0vered by r test him and a^Public )tabtlit said persactor Or subcoo ree,.ae "t• whecause 0f the agreemen. fr contractor my co Develo Persons even though tractor, Or her such OPerature of the0m claims for an one I and e,ployees P any ublic Insu edcarnd OdmOuPC contra t causedaeYlthernegil amp rk or °Yedf by mself Pe The addtton Itabili y and The mini alMell asdttryetly protectdWaa a fnsurO shall Bence of the actors, end 1 Insurance Per City ance0Plall by said aa0n amounts of Polio to 0 Ycofts offfcars)fst the A such insurance shat) bessuedhhsreunderactors and iris Contract agents ifabf' °r s llabiift as follows: she 11 so Y insur state.. ccaurr- Y limits mit a� accident ^O�hanr0E500,Op�f" 1nSury or " e w/thts "Ot less Otcurrenc each arise fr an a than e. and person death work hei In p o OP Ira t 1 0as oP the Develos �'O�DPror ech"Perty damn ge S. AutomebI a liab11/t • accident or Per f0rma ^c Y insurance per in fha Ola/ms which m limits of a °f this a coverfn Performance Of each of "ot less thang=500 � for idi^ all vehicles the a,9reiess th�0S250,urrence, and with Person I "fur Itabtltte tlon gate of not less aoOr eachparcfd�t°adge 1sb 31,000.000 for PrOVidedfforhe Developer 000 which moor occurrifty limits of ` herein. °r his' Contra Y arise from to with do Contractor in Perfomatn theeOPe k , r7 •. 18 Pee Nlth the before the speclfled Ct ty a Certificate on of t Precluding heurance, Each such or 9re by suc his a arr, +erh certteCe etlilatlansI ore Xh certiflcat e° ninsura ^anveloper9hehle shall h,ve icate before the reduction in shall coverin notlffcationPlration coverage ofbear any endorsement As evidence by registered tY (30) days after tdee Ces Comply 'Vrovementhsesaameerthe dSuAdf a provlsions mall fret the insurance itY' and has affixed his signnaature her eto•follandof described �� •a, r; Type: fgl�t , Nacre and addr PQFO�ANCE _ ess of surety. Prfncr _. TYPe; Nacre and address of surety: Type: Name and address of surety: TYPe: Name and address of surety: )t��l� dale Pedcral evi g • Pa's Book AND (� PATNE<iT Prfac Glenda, fpal AMO t ° Pederaf savin4s Peas Bc'k • DEPOSIT a . '�A^'ATIOq $950,000 $475,000 "., 'cndal unt; "N)1�E °derR_ ErIngs Pass P.00k $ 9,800 Principal ArcUnt IO 8E N, 1A dates setNu t and ackn� telartfe�s ACCt� E 8T TIfE `,I fort Date 9 PPosite theff�ed ith have TT by 9 b L fanatu es f °��alltfessrepuIred Presents a to be Y yhature S., u.P v on the Date q / Ilk rn Developer me by Accepted: na re ( 1' eve loPer City of Ran r n 8y: cho Cucamonga' a Munlc! Att Pa) corporation est.. mayor .Approve,;: '^� City Clerk wCity Attorney tyQ'OPER'S SI AND Cq TR PLlfq'R7 '7o For Improvement. 'gent: File R Seotei — 3 L,F S,F S,F S. F. S. F. S,F, TON EA EA, EA, EA. S. F. EA, EA, EA, L,F L F L.F, L,F, EA, EA, EA, EA, EA, E4, EA. EA, EA, CITY OF RANCHO COC EMCRO EMBINEERING DIVESIDe GA ACHMENT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 1 i1,,.._ NOTE, writ/noes not Inc iude currrnt fee or t or Pareent deposits P•C,C, Curb- • B C F, 4• P.C.L, PRICE 24• sidewalk' Drive roach gutter 6 „�9 Preparation gutter (Inc, 2.50 offs Crushed a of subyrade A. C. base {nrr curb ) 3,40 over I list S 1300 )to Inch thick ,) 0.15 ) (4 Ad Just sewer renhOle t” out toagrade street grade 27.00 valves Scree gh is 150.00 i de Removal of A.C, Pavement Streit signs 1000,00 DO Stop signs 0,35 Stre(t Trees 200.00 180 RCP 2000 D 240 RCP 1500 50.00 75.00 D 274 RCP 2000 D} RCP (1 200 29.00 35.00 D Catch basin N : q, Catch b asin 44.00 N . g, Catch basin M Catch basin , 14' 2000.00 3004.00 - N 2l' Local depressfan 3800.00 L ocal depression g. 4500.00 Junction structure Local depeession SOL.0o 700.00 M , 14, Local depression N 5000.00 • 2/' 1100.00 ENGINEERING INSPECTION 1550.00 •RESTORATION /D FEE _ DEPOSIT (REFUNDABLE) Qy ASH 3H 5_ 2j-r-�p MOHUHFNipilOH _ SUB TOTAL _L�_ COBTJNG SURETY (CASH) FAITHFUC"CY COSTS (20 ;) _9,800 GO L PERFO 79, qsl� 18 Pursuant to Cit LABOR A,ND MATERJ�ALCBOND (505Do:) n- Bernardino county Code eaTitjeSUCalonga Municipal •'+ � 00 be •ade Prior to issuance - Chapters cod an I'S• + wsh •Title I, MORE 1 08 Revised 3/84 Engineering Const restoration /delineation" adopting San rec"On Perarlt, posit de shall W O d �'v;M EF JDo 15f0 OMOM City ofuncll iS�r PERFG OF FI P. Rancho' c no CuCftnga AM(AtipTS) Gentlemen: Callfornla 91730 under ant to Ch 12952 argned he reyter 4, Ar Or tic evertffcatetoctobe taande�u t h�seall section 66497 9tneer and 7997 he,i b Lin." ts °f the a cash s 9ned ulrep ��SsPeelf�e5nfshr the stndlt de tnnengj d ri} Jt RESOLUTION No, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CUCA -0fGA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPrOVENENT SECURITY ANO y CITY OF RANCNO ' FIB- NAP OF TRACT p� AGREED!ENi, 12952 lots uN� e. the Tentative Itted Of Naven Avenue by Glenfed Develop ntfCo�poratta. 12952, 9 of 172 been Submitted ' Meat of Ozer Creek Subd consisting b.Y Said to tha Cfit of R Channel and soutF• ofivider' located east satdfCitla' and afn Provided ce n the Cucaaengaidn said Subdfvidetnandvrnue has t ancho Y; and with therequirements of of the State of WHEREAS Ordinance No. 28 of � yovt^- mcntfAgr�etment ls�utmlt e� safdiT�Q�ssaidaAi6dfv�de�I prere to ogeal with herexitA for has offeredethe approval •aid Final Had and sufficient I rovapproval and execution 6 delineated thereon, p offering for j nt Securit Y said dedication for public' and submits for use the streets Rancho Cuca�mp'nla EREFORE, Qai RESa:VED 6y the Cit California, s folloh-c; y Councfl I' That said of the City of behroved Imthe MVo� isgauthorizede and the sane is and the attest tharetoa C1t and to execute same on . And the City Clerk 1s authorized to 2• That said l,npb'ect toSacurity Is accepted as sufficient, thereof by the City Attorne royal as to form andgconte tt 3 That Y: and delineating for dedication and authorized to executo the and the the Final Map of said City, certificate thereon Clerk is on behalf .a afti_ O� ..1..I v ai CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA STAFF REPORT • October 1 , 19 Tot 2MGM to of the City Couae'_1 YRCNt ahative Services Director SUBJECT, rMl- ir. rJICOYJ/PADATI III Council autborixe purchase of 18 vehicles as outlined in the report, in the amount of 0264,375. The PT 86 -a7 Budget includes funds to purchase rev vehicles for the City's expanding maintenance cperations. an] to replace current vehicles whose useful life has been exceeded. To accomplish the new vehicle purchases and replacement of old vehicles. Stall contacted several auto companies. After reviewing the bids. Staff Is recoameading purchase of the following vehicles from Citrus Ford as outlined belovt YLHISIX *6 - Ford F250 Diesel r /r• v /Mod. A 2 - Ford P250 Diesel P/0 No Nod. **1 - Ford P250 Diesel P/0 v /4 /ghl or 2 - Ford F350 Diesel P/D v /Hod. B I - ford F350 Diesel P/0 v/Mod. C 1 - Ford 1350 Diesel P/C v /Mod. D 2 - Ford ganger P/0 1 - ford Tempo 4 -Door Sedan ***2 Chevrolet glazer * 2 are Replacement Vehicles "* Replacement Vehicle »* 1 Replacement Vehicle The purchase price for be vehleles is $249.410; gal" tax is 014.965, with the total purchase price being 0264.375. JHtcv ti 1 �= s U t A 9 CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT Date: October 15, 1986 1977 To: City Council and City Manager Prom: Bill Holley, Community Service Director ;mC 8y: Reran 14eGUire- Emery, Assi-stant Park Pla.nntlr� Subject: Sewer Easement Th ouch Gi�y Park S,g Backarourd: A request for a grant of easement has been received from the, William Lyon Company to install a sewer line for the Cucamonga County Water District within the area designated for the future City Park. This eaaoment is necessary to provide Sewer Service to those tracts within the William Lyon duvelopmnnt which are located directly north of the future par}: site (see nxhiblts). Although gr .sting of such an easement on park facil',tieu is normally discouraged, tl:e City in recaiving in tur•, a Quit Claim Deed f= an existing road easement which the, William Lyon Company has through the same Park Ditn. a Based on the above, it is recommended that City Council authorize staff to process a Grant of Easement fnr Sewer purpcses to Cucamonga County Water District through the future City Park Site as shown in exhibits A, B and C. Attachments: Exhibits A, B, and C 0 d I W -� tuner. Tml N tNalh lW W Wm• 4 W ♦ul tN N tY• W 1rw {. tY nroiell� wN..l) Iunln r rrN M W r.N N evwW �t.•ur. LI•x{l. N nnlw �• Ir.��wyrrlxw lY YwN {Nw w NYI. Wlnwx{G.� N l• LYO Y. VILNY. rpnl.w N tY r.r1 N tuwtw. N W h•.rN. 4YN 41N 01.1141 r An niwr.is4„Yr. .:tT1[( �1'itltt UE �uSteut rltf ,en.- -.erW• aw.a., 4 rlrT SIHA p lYl. aim= WTA AO SVIiAY R NR ae1., u +Irle TI. Rr •WI wY)..... 1. IN Y4M N v t. xtn..ra.. wW. r Wt W upb IY NY )IFIW. yM 1•.�. Iwr.1n. t4Y R p1 tM INpIF N NY rw.YU I/ w11JY WYn pt W rW.W b IY 1.•• 44\ aw11 W W�(p..In wa\ WwYY. wt r rrn WU Wrr. rYN W hY rIT1.IWn YWw W4 tW W W Ntlt n M w YY N W harlprt 4Y YIwW n ILLL 14w..t u.w Y tnwWT .t•.w Iu1Y W a.wtWYw YI WtJIJ W J YY III.IW n III.IYw Iw RMr rW Y IY Nr\ Np. 6p1N WII M 4R.aM N.r(up� w Itl.lt Y M W.pW w ,.[rW.i: lY y. I.Irrly Ir.rl Ilwlt4y .( a4 y pt Nlr.t W pW wWY twpy It tY G.nN. rrp rorM1 {N t4Y n Ia M W Y.t1Y N Y1it�Nn W rm4��t W h,r N!..rFwt(.I tW r\ w W wlw.wt YYl rt � yMW w rYrMllw YLLI Y Nrrr[Y Y W uY •wrY.IIY Wal•r. W Y't Y puNIW. YIYIp. ttMIM• � Ilpllm •M1 pW .pp4Yrtu Wl{ u JI t4Y rrY W Irp.tN .t tY <erY NnIJrw1Y tIt ..Y pn ~t t'w Gw rt1YY F W flwlL W W11 J Y) tW W IM IW Y tW Y pwwYlt. 1. rY. N Y N.•tr. J W Nx...tr/ TM 4. IIp W YI 4 tY npl W 4rn IrYlrl/ •44pt IY IIp14u. W W tWyt Y Y4 nW. YRnrrw Y IWt M Yyl wan W twNi . Mpn)Ytt .xW pY 11"IWI.) 1. W x _• •- - �. wrlr, u e..:l:: -. —,. w. 1ael.ur lnJ a :.ii miwv wisii.a r) p4(.wW Wt. v hrin N rwlrr w rJUVl�it .Y.0 ilnllrf 1'I��IrM1w.• wty j� ��ur...�a.... ctYUr ..t IY rl. pw4. r. itW N W W r p•r.Y W uY IINI W (J .f tY •r. .4O N p4 MY1rt�,r 4Wq IY rpr b.N YI .N•LlM w u. Mn4 pnYr. • W..V Y Y4 W .iw.IMNM r4Y..r Wrnt nWY wr. W Orrw. 4. Nr.nar W Y.4r• fv (• rIW 4 W4 n 4 pnr•Mla n tN tw, �f �1W W hWn Y/ ppP W Np4 W ..•wwt MW Irr, uwtr. T4 Irrrr WII M Ilrlr y.. n11wn 4 M .rfl. r W yn.•.tr W .ulr N n. hWw. Y wR'Y .../. tur.. W War Yb W hart Y Y wntY 1W �� fw .( LYlitIr CITY 0' AAVOC CLrMM''CA. A IMICIVAI BY: WIPOTATIU4 BY. mrt w W IUrmYej " YtW h•f Map Ni4 Y W Iw u4 Grt�wlt MTn r. 1•)WW_ \.a.. u r n N W n.r(N •W. wh! Ir(WI rrnlW N tM .3tW Wnr.4 W o\WI ' Wt��.rN1pN W w. WN br nuns . ws w r)ILIIt Liµl _ v • r4p MW Y nl b• N4 Lrp W hm ..� J. s� Pxhibit 'A• Amendment to Grant of PAe®ent 1. Right to ingress and agrees is exclusively granted to Grantee and their employees, all others shall require encroachment permit issued by the Grantor. 2. Granted shall notify the Grantor in writing prior to any non - emergency work eanmencing on said easement. 1. Granted shall motors to original condition and to the satisfaction of the Grantor, any improvement on said easement damaged accessing easement by Grantee and /or their Representatives. 4. Grantor reserves the right to make grade changed to accomodato the grade design for the City Park Bite. Grantors Grantee, 0 dl raru CCBOa'0 BU VXrBtDARB)CRO 740.00 1 IN TUB R Ctrr Op gIg Boman 0 � RNIA. LBO C0048ON8A• RN1Mpr O) SAN mommll" 4 )IrBfN IAYrg tS IDR ewrrARr S AOINO, � I D 0PN swx I 7PA0 ryy r J., ap BpAPNpoBr@IANc 7R7 4, a PARTICUL,IRLr D CP r8B nx�NT'I' R RODSRR INCLOazn OP Y CW A MAP ) STRIP NO. I: pSCRIB1D BRgthT A8 STAIP Ol SAII, � • BOOKS A 10:00 S 1. 7 AND H. N08R 10 5.00 raer on OrDB ASSIL,*r ON C$ AfU l8 la AMS I BRLINR CAIALINB Tits I P taoCrj CRIe� IOTA trrx0 INS AT TUB C'lurm NR BDAp• AS SHOla S74Ra8CflON Op D88R p 14 Op ON SAID ORRR; C SAID ]4H 7U POINT On • AID CRNTBRt NR ON SA/ORTRAC7 �IL1P TN889 C 8 4 X HB• 27 POINT Rglm oX Ten 30OTNRRI,l T�AAr M40. �tl,) 2.71 jr r07 g8 PRE. M ZllfZ 19 Op OOORg48r STRIP OO IdNO N8R8T Op Baal Ba188 NO Or SAID L0r I 0 SAID 20 R. PNCN P zff oO 1, 0.00 pgg48 7?.. It 3 �js TB871CRIRS LA 1 SAID IN SAID N )`9T8R RA874RLr • �$ TO POt 24 SOONDABr rOP7g a 474.OST P� �1 O) � ID AT IOBT ANOLBS) 28 Op SAID 78 788 glDy� t O IAYP) PROP 7AR � 0 rgg `�AAND Imfoer PO ASTRIP g0, 7ER 1 478 Arrrot S MIA a I�_ T8B0b DLO.VOm �P $480R CORNER 22 80 AS TO or ^rcL OR BO 00 POOP Aar Or SAIO 7 AD no H.00 )fD8 Ag Lpp I P _ j S4 DESCRIBED I B8 RBLr, A.yp OTOp P APORRypn.I� I 88 D8C•INNINO 44r )&n'BRtr o r RxSRS LlINo'. AN�pg TD)INR 10.00 I'8RT BASID IN STRIP N0. I 8 pOLLO�INO �?:� TRY '�1C , *. «• )BSTAtr AI.r C.• (Axo 4BtpN, TRI& OORDARr O Y48 Rg AT R .<F •'.. - ' /uh,u Win;..+ _n �•.. � ,.-__ OP SAID L07b {', sx:•:�<vI0R7.� 3i4� I", a 3 4 6 a 7 a 9 10 11 18 13 14 16 16 17 la 19 1 N 14. 43' 01" a 7oo.00 FEET To POINT D AND TUB EIO Or THE STRIP Or LAND QABSIN DESCRIBED. STRIP NO. 3 A 16.00 FODr ►IDS EABEWWr roil .AFOREMENTIONED PURPOSES LYING ,16 00 FlUT EASTEDLY OF TUB FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT POINT B AS DESCEIBA3 IN STRIP 310. POINT BRING ] HEREDII, 8AI0 10.00 FEET EASTERLY OF (AND MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 1 AND 1, AND N 24. 43. 01" 8 1.124.93 FEET (MRACURED ALONG Tag WESTERLY I HOUNDART OF SAID LOTS)' FROM TUB MOST MESTgHLY BOUNDARY or SAID LOT 1; THENCE M 66. 18' 68" ► 10.00 FEET TO A POINT on THE WESTERLY Lo..I'DARY Or SAID LOT ], &AID POINT BRING TER TRUE POINT or DEOIRNINO OF THE LINE BRING DESCRIBED; THENCE F F2. 43' 01' 8 101 I] LEST TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER IF SAID 7 AND Tun END OF THE EASEMENT' HEREIN DESCRIBED. TREaE g SIDELINE OF S AID SASEMElrr '0 BE PROLONGED 80 AS TO TL It AT TUB NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT E, 80 NOTE: THE BIDE' LI H OF SAID STRIPS 1, 1 AND 3 SHALL BE PROLONGED 81 OR FORESHORTENED 80 AS IO INTERSECT 22 7H!&�MErT WAS PREPARED a OR ONDL7L ^ MT DIflLC770N E4 4 , G 8& 28 27 DART W DOEICH, L.S. 4083 EB THE MORSE CUHSU,TING GROUP ED 4080 IRVINE BOULEVARD. SUITS 101 30 IRVINE. CALIFORNIA Fa7E0 -1989 31 3E G .p7• Nr¢ '�� or,�• peep, y ��c� ,%✓ N1r Q� C �N�� ;��p (� v • sTT�i� N T �rR, �r�O9 v� Zk J �.,ErcH ro F SEWER ACCOMPANY Ao EASEMENT ANO APPUR�NL OESC IPn0N %ESC^ Eutrerr ANCEg RV ��809 GROUP • 'Tva3i c•. �+"'_•.n- a «�YS:.'s :4!G�: a�a- ni, X14A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM014GA STAFF REPORT r` tins Date: October 15, 1986 To: City Council and City Manager From: Bill Holley, Community Service Director y/ By: Karen McGuira- Emery, Assistant Park PI:nzo ('" Subject: Improvement of Beryl and Lions Park Earlier this year, the City received notification that the State grant applications for the improvement of Beryl and Lions Parks had bean successful. These •grants provide for tennis courts, picnic tables, barbecues, and overhead shelters as well as other miscellaneous improvements for both park sites. Two design firms have submitted proposals for engineering services. Both firms have provided similar services to the city for previous projects and are very responsible. Thass firms are Purkiss Rose Associates, in the amount Lt $21.000.00, and recreation Systems Inc. for $18.100.00. That City Council authorise the Community Services Department to award the contract for Engineering Services to Recreation Systems Inc., in the amount of $18,100.00 plus a 10% contingency. �Q a DATE. T0: FROII: BT: SUBJECT: REC04ftAT10y "NINO C"" pp�C STAFF RR�,��� GA October Is, '1586 City C0jnc11 0 Uoyd 8 and cftq• yaoa9er Ft Rubbs, Cft t Laura p Y Engineer +sn Contractss, tandsc Landscape Oeslgme1 It Is rec �irch/tectura,aServices for Haven Avenuerflediao tional for addit o'roended that. landscaping Lands is ° be drawn of om Beau t Associates atf cFrpora0°sign Servicntract. Chan e ands, The additfonaven Avenueer So' I Mena dai iandsc na1 fe a uofi0�a00 P rep... .andolphe11) wok alo�ltecturai Of tfon medlans�socfat�ayen Aven�. es are Inc�leaisnal Pee opa1T Havenween Arrau°RUfred deli °rf91ne1 iced to addr Funds. a from f18,S�Op�'C0ledlans ! Ou pond 19th and constrict! C. $5 85. an RespectfulI t0 $11 *000e00,r�d ThetcontreetetoWilsohenneN °scont Av °bmftt d� wi11 be paid frc6 tBeautffl at ill l8y :dlq J Attachents ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCANpNOA LANDSCAPE ARCHIiECi SERVICES CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER ff oor r Landscape Design Concepts and Acct Haven Avenue N,edian lsiandNorkfn Os �. 21. 4647_8138 CO 85 1141n Ylubtk� 10_15.86 7 oat sates_ r -_ - (:Ttv �_ V—e You are hereb �- — " "Lett =rentn street - °` �"^—� Y requested to vers e, engineering services. t0nQ1Y with the following changes from the agreement for Increase Scope Street to r Work to include medians from In Contract Price Wilson Avenue �r0w Route and from In Concrac tip e lgth Street to 17,000,00 The ex TOTAL _ and bid scope will enable the entire 7.000 as length protect. of Haven Avenue to be developed The aaount of the Contract seven thousand will be (Decreased The Contract Tot ) (Increase(' by the sum of: [went _flue al Including this and - - -G" "ars (1 7 000 66 thousand five hundred-._P_eV1ous----- The Contract Change Orda•-s will be: Period provided for "- Dollars (125 50d�� Days completion will be (Increased)(pecreased This docu ent will bee hereto, su ) (Unchan ed ement to the Contract Arid all provisions will tequested o apply Accepted 1 Approved: e7 d ae i s �• n a y , o o �ty nco uc aonga w n u ra a nS erec am c _ ------Da s o an, [� e 14 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 15, :986 TO: City Council and City Manar,r FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Te0nician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Extension Agreement for Tract 11577 located on the west side of Turner Avenue, south of Base Line, submitted by Terrance Lane RECCMNENDATION It is recommended that the City Council ?dopt the attached resolution, accepting said extension agreement and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements for Tract 11577 were approved by the City Council on Novt=,her 7, 1984, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance 4ond: $73,500 Labor and ..aterial Bond: $36,750 The developer, Terrance Lane, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Extension Agreement are available in the City Clerk's Office. Res ctfully su tied, Att ments 1 1 to �Lr ae I q LO •, I _ � � «�--� 1�_. r ,_..c -ems d P.N nd� •yr .ui /� N, CITY or rrE RANCHG CUCAMONGA TIT1,E; TRACT 11577 WGIt'iEMWG DIVISION EXIi1BpI;__ }F, ImpExtAgmt ` CUT OF RANCHO COCANOrEA 'y LVMIO D%W EXTENSION A611EDW FOR TRACT 11577 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That this agreement is made and entered into, 4n conformance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, a municipal torpor Lion by an between the said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and . rra5ce A lane referred to as the Developer. r YITNESSETN: THAT, WHEREAS said Developer entered into an improvement agreement with the City as a requisite to Issuance of buildings permits, and WHEREAS, said Developer desires an extension of time to complete the terms of the said improvement agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by the City and by said Developer as follows: 1. The completion date of the terms of the said improvement agreement is hereby extended by a period of 12 months from the date of City Council approval of said agreement. 2. lie eele with this agreeme.b—"d- sh-lil b-! i A, - NIA i 4. All other terms and conditions of the said improvement agreement shall remain the same. As evidence of understanding the provlo ons contained herein, and of Intent to comply with same, the Developer has submitted the below described inpruverent security, and has affixed his signature hereto: m 3/17/66 i. 4 '�Ti, . ■ FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE FOND Description: Additional Principal Amount: N/A Surety: Address: < MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND , Description: Additional Principal Amount: N/A Surety: Address: CASH DEHISIT "JMEXfATION BOND N/A Additional Cash Deposit: IWINTENANCE BUARANTEE BOND N/A Principal Amount: To be posted prior to acceptance of the project by the City, r ,w 4fiiM4k CITY OF RANCHO CUC.%4ONOA DEVELOPER CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation By: "'7� L� Jeffrey King, Mayor Terrance Lane Attest: C Beverly A-. uc a et, y Clerk U' MOTE: FORK MUST BE CWtEiEO IN TRIPLICATE AND DEYELMM S SIOY1IM MUST BE NOTARIZED r 7"y Y MJtSL� �• ih{ pa _ 1 I=ExtAgmt CITY of RANCHO ClICNiONGA MOYE7FJIT EXTENSION AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 11577 KNDM ALL NO dY THESE PRESEIRS: That this agreement is made and entered into, in confunaance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the City of Rancho "Lc marga, California, a municipal carpor tion by an between the said City, hereinafter referred to as the City, and lerrahce A Qaiie referred to as the Developer. THAT, WHEREAS Sato Developer entered Into an improvement ayeement with the City as a requisite to issuance of buildings permits, and VHERF%S, said Developer desires an extension of time to complete the terms of the said Improvement agreement. NON, THEREFORE, it Is hereby igr •' by the City and by said Ceveloper as follows, I. The rpmpletion date df the term: of the said improvement agreement is hereby extended by a period if 12 months from the date of City Ccuncll approval of said agreement. 2 `n,eFease k A, A 3. ed smi & "d- ••!ne— add4•i4mai-- yr- 4ne4C -, amemn.6 1; 5 eaF are—set N/A Fait! al et. 4. All other terms and conditions of the said improvement agreement shall remain the sane. As avidencd of understands the provisions :ontdindd herein, and of intent to cOM-Y with same, the Deve per has submitted the below described Improvement secur ty, and has affixed his signature hereto: 3/17/26 Wr :, 'a s _ �s ■ FAITHFUL PEAFURMA M BOND Description: Additional Principal Amount: N/A Surety: Address: MATERIAL AND LABOR BOND Deccriotion: Additional Principal Amount: 7/A Surety- Address: CA;41 DEPOSIT MONUMMATTON DOW N/A Additionri Cash Deposit: MAIPTEKAKCE GUAR/IM BGAD N/A Principal Amount: To 9e posted prior to acceptance of the project by the City. HHftIfAMRMffMHrlJt/1[ HHMMYrIfHM 4Mf+rp CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DEVELOPER CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation i7By: Jeffrey King, Mayor Terrance—W. Lane Attest: Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk KUM: FOPW 1:!'<T BE CO PLETEO III TRIPLICATE AND DEVELtM IS SIGGNNATTME MUST BE MDTARUM 0 i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUhCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 11577 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an improvement Extension Agreement executed on October 2, 1985, by Terrance Lane as developer, for the F Improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described th['cin, and generally located on the west side of Turner, south of Base Line, and WHEREAS, the installat' .,r such improvements, described in said '1 Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in coniunction with the development of said Tract 11577; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Extension Agreement is secured and rccompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Extension Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Extension Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Extension Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 1 i. gi Yy� ■ l�= ds �i . I I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 15, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 9955 located between Arrow Highway and Civic Center Drive and between Red Oak and White Oak, submitted by B.C.E. Development RECOMIEMDATIOM It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached revolution approving Parcel Map 9955 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Parcel Hap 9955 was approved by the Planning Coma:ssion on September 10, 1986, for the division of 14.36 acres of land into 7 parcels in the Industrial Park Development District located between Arrow Highway and Civic Center Drive and between Red Oak and White Oak. Improvements are to be constructed at the time of building permit Issuance. Resp tfully piuttedZ LB Atta nts 4' �DD >,s r nr,y1 i �' S /6/ 3� 9 zo U A V � � U M rr L: 9' RESOLUTION N0, ?(e —.Z)9J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHD CUC.YIONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9955 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 9955) WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 9955, submitted by B.C.E. Development and consisting of 7 parcels, located between Arrow Highway and Civic Center Drive and between Red Oak and White Oak, being a division of Parcel Map 7494, as per nap recorded in Book 208 of Parcel Maps. Page 36, in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, Parcel Map Number 9955 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Nap; and WHEREAS, all of the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the City Council of said City have now been met. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaonga, California, that said Parcel Map Number 9955 be and the same is hereby approved and the City Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be filed ffoor� record. t ■ r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 13, 1966 TO: City Council and City Manager \V1 PROMS Mark R. Lorimer, Admf.tstra.ivo Anslyst I,WA-- SORJRrr; RESOLDyIfn ON PaM'OSIyf09 62 17i6&EKWOWL It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution opposing Proposition 62. The attached Resoluti, pertains to Proposition 62 authored by Howard Jarvis s:d appearing on th. Rovember, 1986 ballot. For Council consideration and approval, the Resolution opposes Proposition 62 and its attempt at significantly restricting the City's taxing authority. Should you have any Questions or comments regarding the attached Resolution. please contact mo. MRL /dja Attached /a 3 3 •td � t t a9� RCOOLOTIM NO. 86-«- A RESOLUTION OF TEN CITY COUNCIL OF SHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING PROPOSITION 62 WHEREAS, Proposition 62, authored by Howard Jarvis, is a proposed constitutional amendment appearing on the Eovasber, 1986 ballot; and WHERIAB. Proposition 62s proposes to significantly restrict local governments from r+ covering necessary costs for cervices by requiring a local election nod two- thirds vote to :reuse or add any general tax or fee; and SIBERIAN, Proposition is an unfair and damaging place of legislation, and if passed. v .d have detrimental Impacts on the City's efforts at providing quality municipal services, leaving our City far last efficient and effective; and WHEREAS, if passed, Proposition 62 would significantly hinder the City of Rancho Cucamonga from recovering the sear- iurreasisg costs necessary to provide snrvicas such as business licensing and processing of development plans; and WMBRPAS, since 1978, experience has shown that the two- thirds vote requirameot to unreasonably difficult to achieve and unfavorably hinders local governments from increasing necessary taxes and fees; and WHEREAS, Proposition 62 is opposed by way reputable and responsible organizations, including the League of California Cities, rat, THEREFORE. HE IT RESOLVES, that the r-acho Cucamonga City Council oppooes Proposition 62 in its attempt at restricting the taxing authority of local governments by requiring a local election and two- thirds vote to increase or add any gaaarol tar or tae. PASSED. APPROVED, and dDOPTED this a day of e. 19s. AYES: Noss, ABSENT: ATTEST: Jeffrey Ring, Mayor , Beverly A. Autbele., City Clark r� t ., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DAM October 15. 1986 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman City Manager SUBJECT: City Logo gEMMIEEDATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council authorise the staff •; cospleto necessary steps to copyright the City Logo which we have been using for the past several years. The puz..osa of the copyright is to prevent unauthorised use of the City logo without the City's permission. LM9:bas /015- CM OF R4NCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 15, 1956 T0, Mayor and Members of the City Council PROM, Jiu Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECTS ILVORART Ogg OP PELUffAL MXQ,b RECOMMENDATION, Conrail authorise Dave Blevine, Maintenance Superintendent, to use his personal vehicle on an interim lasis for City business, and authorize ps7ewut of $250 per month auto allovaece to help defer costs. The demand for use of City pick -up trucks far maintenance, rather than supervisory, activitieo has increased. Current field supervisory staff have reliegmished use of their City pick -op trucks to maiat- %ante staff and are currently using Building and Safety inspection vehicles available due to turnover. The nam buildirg inspectors mill be ecerting shortly nod etber temporary arrangements for maintenance supervisors are being made. Sam vehicles are being purchased and should be here in opprcmLostely 90 days. Dave Blevinn, Maintenance Superintendert, bas volunteered to utilise his personal vehicle during the interim period. This mould release his City pick-up for use by the mainteneaee crews. I an recos ading that Dave Blevins be authorised to utilize his personal vehicle and the City grout him the normal $2`0 per math auto allowance to help cover his costs. By using Mr. Bledas personal vehicle, the need to rent an additional interim vehicle at approximately $750 par month is reduced. funds are available in the current budget. Respectfully submitted, t f Jim Dart Administrative Services Director Jolts IM" S r ATTV ALA D A MOUA roT TO A "ANTO A STAFF REPORT y. r 0 DATE October 15, 1986 977 TO: City rouncil and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B Hubbs, City Engineer BY Blane W. Frandsen, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execution of the Agreement for Replacement of Overhead with Underground Distribution Facilities between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Southern California Edison Company and the reallocation of additional Beautification Funds in the amount of $97,389.00 to provide for this Agreement and the completion of the utility undergroundings as are associated with the Hermosa Avenue Videning from Victoria to .9th Street, the Hamilton Street Extension and the Hermosa Park Construction I RECOMMENOATIM It is hereby recommended to approve and otherwise execute e a ac a Agreement for the Replacement of Overhead with Underground Distribution Facilities' between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Southern California Edison Company for underground power cables and street lights along Hermosa Avenue from 19th to victoria Streets and also along Hamilton Street between Hermosa Avenue and the Deer Canyon School The cost for conductors as included in the Agreement, amounts to $74,119.00 for power cables and $6,470.00 for street lights for a total of $62,589 00 In addition to this, $14,800.00 is needed to provide for the full contract mount of 1114,800.00, as was received in tM, Hermosa Park Construction bid which provides for the underground Auct installation for thn same undergrounding project. This will bring the total Beautification Fund budget alloration for the underground utility workings to $197,389.00 II ANALYSIS: On October 2, 1986, the Southern California Edison Company ss� Lhe attached Agreement for the subject undergroundings. This work 1s to be done as part of the City's Capital Improvement Project to Widen and improve Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street and Victoria Avenue as well as extending Hamilton Street from Hermosa to Beer Canyon School and the northside widening of Hamilton Street in front of the Deer Canyon School ending at Cart111a Avenue. Included in this Agreement will be the costs to provide street ligl s for the project reaches of Hermosa and Hamilton in an amount of $e,470 00. The cost to place electrical conductors within the City- furnished conduits and the removing of the existing overhead poles and lines amount to $74,119.00 for an Agreement total of $82,589.00. The City, through the existing ;onst•uction contract to build the Hermosa Park and provide for the subject street widening and extensions, will pay 107 49 01i1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF =REP AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY October 15, 1996 Page SO. CAL. EDISOA a contract amount of $114,800.00 for the utility duct Mark and vault installations into which the Edison Coryany will later place its power cables. In the original budget allocation for the 1986 -87 fiscal year, $100,000.00 was budgeted from the Beautification Fund for such workings. The recuaaendation, as noted, will augment the original budget allocation by and provide he $82,589.00 corstruction obligation of This will bring total Beautification Fund allocation tar the Hermosa Avenue Undergroundings to $197,389.00. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BWF:ko Attachmants /Z) , MEMM -no nc.a ecy r r, cis co AGREEMENT FOR REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD KITH UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES (Substructure Installation by Appllcants) *"HIS AGREEMENT, =de this day of . 19_, between SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY. a corporation, hereinafter called 'Utility', and the patty or parties whoas mines are subact t4 hereunder as'Applicants% WITNESSETH. W)'LHEAS.APpllmn:s have requested Utility. pursuant to Section D.of Utility's Rude No. to. Replacement N Oved.ead with LMerprouod Oistribution Facilities, to replace Utility's existing overhead with underground disul'vtim facilities at the location or Iaearions In the County of San Bei=ird a, ,State of Cotlfomla, substantially described as follows: $/S Hermosa Bets = 19th and Victoria S/S Hamilton E/O Hemosa , Rancho Clraamnga and as shown on the map attached hereto and made a pan hereuf and WHEREAS. u. It is necessam for ail property owners sewed from UtilUS a overhead facilities to be removed to spree in writing to perform the widng changes na owners premises so that service may he tiim,shed from Utilits's undergrotmd JIstribution system in accordance wnt Utility's rules and that I muv msconnnue Utility's ovemead Service up= completion of Unhn's underground facilities, of b. Suuabte legislantn Is to effect requiring such property owners to mate such necessary wiring changes and uuthnnzlng Utility to discontinue Utilitv's gaminess semce: and WHEREAS. Undergrnud service connecitous to each applicant from Utility's underground distribution sysrn sill be InsR:IH %nd MIntatned as provided in Unhiv's rules applicable thereto: NOW. THEREFORE, In consideration of the premises, and of its mutual promises and covenants of the parties hereto. hereinafter contained, it is mutually agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows. viz. 1 Applicants will pav to Utility concurrently with the execution hereof the nonrefundable amount of s 74.119.00, which Is the excess. If any, of the estimated coars, exclusive of transformet, meters and services. of completing the underground system over building a new equivalent overhead system. The amount contributed thereto by each of said Applicants 1s designated after his time herein. after 2. Applicants will furnish and install the pads and raults fat transformers and associated equipment. conduits. 1ucta, boxes, and electrollcr bas s, and perform other work related to structures and substructures including breaking of pavement, tienchih backfIlling, and repaving required in con• neetim with installation of the undenitmund eystem, all N accordance wlm Utility's specifications and dining requirements at Applicant's expense. 3. utility, will complete its undergrounding of said overhead dletnbutlon facilities, pro• vised, however. Utility has been granted riytts of way therefor sallsfactuty to and without cost to Utility. /d9 e 4. Parties bereto do hereby declare it is their ma: al intention that drift to and ownership '• said undergound structtnes and suWtrncttxe, consisting or pads, vaults, coeEWU, ducts, ooaes, and troller baxs seats vest m Utility. Applicants do hereby agree, that Immediately upco completion of IL uederground system deucribed hereinalwve and acedpiance by'Udllty, t1U.:e each and every com. ponem part thereof shall Imnedlateiy Mss to Utility without further acticn . + the pan of Applicants. S. Applicants each agree Applicants will Perform necessary wlr.ng changes on Applicants' Pre';$" so that Service my be famished if= Utlllty'e underground dlstrtbutton system In acbordarr" with Utility's rules, and Utlltry my discontinue thUlty'a overhead service udoo completion or utA ly's underground facilities. 6. This contract Is nubje.:t to the Coles of Utility. 7. TLU contract shall t all times be sabjeet to such changes or avdillcatbts by the Public Utilities Commission of [be p:a.e of California u said Coem.leslon my, Uses t ;-e re eb te, direct to the exercise of its Jurisdiction. IN WITNESS WEERF.OP, the parties hereto have executed this 29Tment on the day and +ear first above w tlen. AddltiOml 3111ing for Street Lights SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY Differential - 613,470 R.C. S:haafer Dlsuialdanager Ontario tSisu:ct SIGNATURE OF APPLICANTS ADDRESS City of Rancho CUCSronoa 9329 Da3elim 91730 ,tbrk Order Umber: 6434- 7170 6 -7124 6634 -4396: 6-4215 1663 TOTAL AMOUNT C04TRIBUTED �a s74,11Q. 2_ r t�;; RESOLUTION NO. 9 (P ->U A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT FOR REPLACEMENT OF OVERHEAD WITH UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES FOR HERMOSA AVENUE AND HAMILTON STREET AND TO ALLOCATE BEAUTIFICATION FUNDS FOR THE PUBLIC FUND EXPENDITJRES SEpUIRED BY SAID AGREEMENT AND THE ACCOMPANYING CITY EXPENDITURES RELATED TO THE HERMOSA AVENUE UTILITY =ERGAOURDING WHEREAS the City of Rancho Cucamonga is in the process of constructing certain street improvements along Hermosa Avenue between 19th Street and Victoria Street and Hamilton Streat between Hermosa and Cartilla Avenues. Such improvements which will cause the relocation and undergrounding of the existing power lines, and; WHEREAS, the Southern California Edison Company possesses such power lines and facilities and submits to the City for approval and execution an 'Agreement for Replacement of Overhead with Underground Distribution Facilittes' which is attached hereto, and which Provides for the installation the City, and ctolinstall enepwastreet lights and nto removectne existing overhead power facilities, and; WHEREAS, the City wishes to provide for such expenditures as are obligated by such Agreement from the Beautification Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Clerk to sign such d said Department to Mayor current budget allocations or the Beautification Fund for the Hermosa Avenue Utility Undergroundings to provide for this Agreement and the completion of the City's conduit and substructure construction as required therefore to a total amount estimated at $197,389.00. 4 . _.:%. e t- Y a� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 3, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Cathy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion Parcel Map 7827 - Located on Lomita Court and Archibald Avenue DEVELOPER: Calmark Dev. Corp. 2121 Cloverfield Blvd. Santa Monica, CA 90406 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $180,400 The required street improvements have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City CoUncll accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Cl �k to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $180,400. Respectfully Submitted, LBH:CB:me Attachmants //a j RECORDING REQUESTED BY: •e CITY OF RA14CV() CUCARONGA P. 0. Box 607 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate In the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: Parcel Map 7827 2. Tne full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RAIN;HO CUCAMOHGA, 9320 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 15th day of October, 1986, there was completed on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Parcel Map 7827 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a wl•ole was: Calmark Development Corporation 5 The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Parcel Map 7827 Thi street address of said property is N/A �Le .s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Owner Lloyd ZTfy­rngfneer 4 ,C i RESOLUTION NO. D � - I. q 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 7827 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE NORM, WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 7827 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the _ work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 3, 1936 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Ctthy Becker, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion Parcel Map 5192 - Located on the Hest side of Archibald, north of Base U.na DEVELOPER: Calmark Development Corporation 2121 Cloverfield Boulevard Santa Monica, CA 90406 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $49,000 The required street improvements have been completed ir, an acceptable manner and it is recomcended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in tho amowt $49,000. Respectfully submitted, LBII: CB: me Attachments RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLFJOC CITY Or RANCHO CUGWONa P. 0. Box WY Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an Interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate Is parcel Map 5792 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 9329 -C Base Line Road, P. 0. Box 807, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. 3. On the 15th day of October, 1986, there was complet >d on the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set f `h in the contract documents for: Parcel Map 5792 4 The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: Calmark Development Corporation 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: Parcel Map 5792 The street address of said property is N/A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, Cwrer Date Lloyd 8. Hubbs. Gity tnginFer to „ RESOLUTION NO. S A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ' FOR PARCEL MAP 5792 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 5792 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE, be it resolved, that t'ie work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorised to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. k 1, ♦ •Y1, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �k STAFF REPORT 0 DATE: October 15, 1986 a TO: City Council and City Manager 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Nubbs, City Engineer BY: Judy A. Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Ordering the Work in Connetion with Annexation No. 13 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 for Tract Nos. 9649, 11793, 11932, 12726, 12727, 12801, 13117, 11606 -2, 11606 -3, 11606 -4, 11606 -5, 10827, 10827 -1, 10827 -2, 10827 -3, 11626, 10076, and 13066 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 13 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 and approving the final Engineer's Report. Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 13 for the above tracts. The developpers of the tracts being annexed have been notified of the public hearing by mail and by publication in the local newspaper. The resolution also approves the Engineer's Report for the subject tracts. Respectfully subol ed, LBN: A:dlw Attachments //v ,1 r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 13 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 9649, 11793, 11932, 12726, 12717, 12801, 13117, 11606 -2, 11606 -2, 11606 -3, 11606 -4, 11606 -5, 10827, 10827 -1, 10827 -2, 10827 -3, 11626, 10076 AND 13066 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 17th day of September, 1986, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 86 -269 to order the therein described work in connection with Annexation No. 13 to Street Lighting Mainterance District No. 2, which Resolution of Intention No. 86 -269 was duly and legally published in the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolutior, of intention on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, he:dad 'Notice of Improvement•, was duly and legally posted in the time, form, nanner, location, and number as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Posting said notices, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all parsons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -269, according to the names and addresses of such owners as the same appears on the last mailing or as known to the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga., which said copies were duly mailed in the time, farm, and manner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Mailing on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the ,jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and 0e benefits to be derived therefrom and said City Council having now acquired ,jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the public interest and convenience requires the annexation to the District and the ordering of the work, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set forth and described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -269, be done and made; and l/9 SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally approved; anT -- SECTION 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer'Weparfare hereby approved. s ti e /`-) — '. x• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 13 L iJ •rl. I A.• � •9 w w ✓fin e - n9 w qn �•� '� i r N• t, ° 9' t e'• ,,.) .a e I� ,1 a• t w +9• Mi 7 t •9 a .A e ! !e .v - e - s w�s • • w w w ,s ° j �•s M" OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF BAN BERNARDINO TR ,9649 STATE OF CALIFORNIA f; t N LLOYD Ii1BB7. CITY ENGINEER T 23EEg ATE p.,. 1p- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUOAMONOA 7 is COU144 OF SAN E WMWINO STATE or aALIFORPiIA �T C C 3 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE 01;3TRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 13 I' i - - �k �- �. lit -; fir, r- CI""Y OF RANCHO CUC"ONGA L • ._ �'� COUNTY OF BAN BEBNARDINO BTATE OF CALIFORNIA N ✓A-' Im LIOYp 4iU885. CITY ENGINE R P ^ 1 � T 27p99 PATE i ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGk title .1—L .•�� � COUNTY OR SAN BMWARDWO jI STATE OF CALIFORNIA �I 5 1; 1171 LLOYD M.1889 CITY ENGI p R �� + • 2388! DA, _ -1 `\ ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 13 .M e 3 IW i 7 i .•feb f/ 1C� F _ 7 A mc* ro �i•i• rainiw.sr Rio CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C'•y� COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO i STATE OF CALIFORNIA ,m :> > "I, LLOYD M1BB$ CITY ENGIN R R ,p3ep9 GATE pale ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 93 LCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �I�t7 eLfe � COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO A BTATE OF CALIFORNIA 1WY0 HUBBS�C IIY-u N $R RCF238E9 nATF C C. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 13 5,� CITY OF A LNCHO CUCAMONGA a COUNTY OF S.1N BIItNARDINO ,/�` STATE OF CALIFORPiIA w, T LLOYD M1BB5 CITY ENGIN_ER RCE2lBB9 �4TE l� page ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTINO MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2( ANNEXATION NO. 13 N VA.- sr et �i S02ims,� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA title; 1 TR 116 .' • �� COUNTY OF BAN BUN.,MDIIdO 11606 -a,ll s r !i� STATE OF CALIFORNIA r s 7u N — y'," Hq LLOYD HUBB5 CITY ENGINE R C ,23889 GATE - Pia r Y 14 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRIC F NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 13 t �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA title, sn 10827.10827• COMM OF SAN BERNARDINO 10927- 2,10e27- STATE OF CALIFORNIA im i , r n wmac riry ria� ,L ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 13 i r ----- r j 1 ZZ J 4 p - lYJ � Oiy N_I N.r ww.l .M� Vtr t I I� J.ii•� � '� r�l 1 1 3 14 Ip 11 V. IoW 4t.r 17, (::.1 O 1 I I9 S,r.S11R�y title• CITY OF RANCHO CUCA>tiONGA TR IbM COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA cl 1� N LLOYD 110BSS CITY ENGINEE RCE23BB9 DATE Daft 1.3 M. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 ANNEXATION NO. 13 u �` / C I .` u- :w %si Rey CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA tithe; Tq 13_ 066 �,- �. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO - - -` c STATE_ OF CAIMRNIA ' � - N I LLOYD H188S. CITY ENGIN ERRCE238B3 ° ' P2ft DAYF. /3a CITY V RAACHO CUCAM04GA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 Annexation No. 13 for Tracts 9649, 11793, 11932, 12726, 12727, 12801, 13117, 11606 -2, 11606 -3, 11606 -4, 11606 -5, 10027, 10827 -1, 10827 -2, 10827 -3, 11626, 10076, 13066 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Artlule 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912). SECTION 2. Gene-al Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit "A• into Street Lighting Maintenance District no. 2. The City Council has determined that. the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with tht assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In the case of condcminiums with airspace ownership only, and apart:.,ents, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and he assessnrnt diagram for the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting improvement on the individual development is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans 4nd specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all nr any part of �r any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All improvements wilt be constructed by developers. Based on available data, It is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estic.ated only, actual assessments will be based on actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (including Annexation No. 13 comprised of 3677 units and 959 SBOOL lights ) is shown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamps Lamps Lamp Size+ YTD Annexed Rate 9500L 0 0 $10.16 SBOOL 651 303 8.93 27, 5001. 0 0 15.31 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamms Rate Moos Total 0 X 10.16 X 12 S 0 959 X 8.93 X 12 102,766.44 0 X 15.31 X 12 0 ru7mrR 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Total Annual haintenance Cost $102,766_44 • 527.95 /year /unit —moo.. ofTn— n str c $27.95 dividod by 12 • 32.33 /mo. /unit Assessment shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. �Y 3�1 a i �t c t crCTION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled "Street lighting Maintenance District No. 28, Annexation No. 13. These diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for the District a,e found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment fe^ each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It 1s proposed that all future developments shall be annexed to the District. SECTION 7. Order of Everts 1. City Council adopts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopts Resolution of Prolimina y Approval of City Cnginaer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of intention to annex to District and sets public hearing date. 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimonl and determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. 5. Every ;ear in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, or modifies and approves the individual assessments. V ♦ � , 1!4 l °� EXHIBIT •A• Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation llo. 13 of Street Lighting Maintenance District 2: + Annexation No. 13 TRACT OIU 5800L 9649 39 19 11793 47 15 11932 10 ? 12726 29 6 12727 23 3 12801 98 11 13117 302 36 11606 -2 11606 -3 277 72 11606 -4 11606 -5 10827 10027 -1 321 97 10827 -2 10027 -3 11626 83 37 10076 19 8 13066 27 2 TOTAL 1,275 308 rt. von M, 4 I' r 1.. .— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA stir �y. STAFF REPORT �� I � DATE: October 15, 19% i rf TO City Council and City Manager 1977 FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer OY: Judy A. Acosta, Jr. Engineering Aide SUBJECT: Ordering the Work in Connection with Annexation No. 17 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract Nos. 9649, 11793, 11932, 12601, 12726.. 12737, 13117, 13203, 11606 -2, 11606 -3. 116C6-4, 11606 -5, 10827, 10827 -1, 10827 -2, 10827 -3, 11126, 10076, 11915 and 13066 REC0MV0D /TIOM It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering the work in connection with Annexation No. 17 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and approving the final Engineer's Report. Attached for City Council approval is a resolution ordering the work to connection with Annexation, No. 17 for the above tracts. The developers of the tracts being annexed have been notified of the puhlic hearing by mail and by publication in the local newspaper. The resolution also approves the Engineer's Report for the subject tracts. Respectfully subml ted, LBH: :dlw Attachments 1 + y 157 I 'eft . AI RESOLUTION NO. VL -60-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI11 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA OROERING THE HORK IN CONNECTION WITH hNNEXATION NO. 17 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AHD ACCEPTING THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NO. 9649, 11793, 11932, 12601, 1277.6, 12727, 13117 13103, 11606 -2, 11605 -3, 11E06 -4, 1.1606-5, 10627, 1.6287 -1, 1002/ -2, 10827 -3, 11626, 10076, 11915 AND 13066 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga did on the 17th day of September, 1986, adopt its Resolution of Intention No. 86 -267 to order the therain described work in connection with Annexation No. 17 to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1, which Resolution of Intention No. 86 -267 was duly and legal lyy published to the time, form and manner as required by law, shown by the Affidavit of Publication of said Resolution of Intention on fi1L in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notice of the passage of said Resolution of Intention, headed "Notice of Improvement", was duly and leyally posted in the time, fwm, manner, location, and number as required by law, is appears Vom the Affidavit of Posting said nott:is, on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, after the adoption thereof, notices of the adoption of the Resolution of Intention were duly mailed to all persons owning real property proposed to be assessed for the improvements described in said Resolution of Intention No. 86 -267, according to the names and addrebses of such owners as the same appears on the last muilin or a; known to the City Clark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which said copies were duly mailed in the time, form, and Tanner as required by law, as appears from the Affidavit of Meiling on file in the office of the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, said City Council having duly received considered evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdiction facts in this proceeding and concerning the necessity for the contemplated work and the benefits to on derived tlerefrom and said City Council having now acquired Jurisdiction to order the proposed work. SECTION 1: It is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the p10,Iic interest and convenience requires th,a annexation to the District and the crdering of ;,,u v rk, and said City Council hereby orders that the work, as set for•'• and described in said Resolution or Intention NL. 86 -267, be Joie and made; and 136 �{J SECTION 2: The Report filed by the Engineer is hereby finally _ *, approved; ate~ ` t• SECHON 3: The assessments and method of assessment in the Engineer's eport are hereby approved. t M—,, , ,a IC~�y • `I p A�i IW C4 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 17 CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA L ...,� COUNTX OF SAN IIERNARDINO A j� STATE OF CALIFORNIA T Im LLOYD HUBBS CITY ENGINEER 23889 OATS lv Y L. i .9 _ s8• i 7 9. Y r® w fi •A - � - ts. Y • 9 - \\ w9 '9- •� 9 A A Fy/ 9 na ti w-J r r /1 s CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMONGA L ...,� COUNTX OF SAN IIERNARDINO A j� STATE OF CALIFORNIA T Im LLOYD HUBBS CITY ENGINEER 23889 OATS lv Y L. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 C ANNEXATION NO. 17 CI j ii �m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF BAN BERPTA2iDIN0 STATE OF CALEPORNIA N so P°« LLOYO NUBBS MY ENGINEER RCE W8 GATE E ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 17 It i f�- �• O' y0 L O O � 19 Y :•.pj�M v�.x'�{ � t 5� �c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA tMe COUNTY OF SAN BERNARD1NO A S'T'ATE OF CALIFORNIA --- LLOYD NUB85, CITY ENGINEER R GE 23829 Geir Page I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w �s COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO , \ Si C STATE OF CALIF RNIA N �m S� LLOYD MMl95. CITY ENC;wFFa err `\ ,Y C C L ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 17 d_ Vlpy}V Y4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • _ COUNTY OF BAN BERNARDINO `\ STATE OF CALIFORNIA N 1171 (LLOYD MRHS. CITY 0 pate t =t ml ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING.. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 r ANNEXATION NO. 17 N, I D I 'M I r l SO I A I I t0 I u 1 np I yI +arcr w uw ue miw.rr ° JJ Yr 1 rwaln wr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COTJ1 TY OF HAN BERNARDINO A 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 5 N Im _ LlgYp M188S, CITY ENGINEER wec �asD� �— 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM F STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0.1 APINEXA11 N0.17 C L21 r_- Crn OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA COUNTY OF SM BMNARDINO STATE OF CAJdFORNIA Tl,VTA _OYO IUAAS_ Ciry cur:iue� n.ee,. --1 1 I Or ,? ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 17 II I WRAC 71 NO. 12040 M. 104/01 -03 uC YO I I t�9t Cal 0 r ~ V CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO , i; STATE OF CALIFORNIA i> LLOYO NUKES. CITY ENMNF f4nrc *aem Lor I nK .e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w COUNTY OF 8AN BERNARDINO , i; STATE OF CALIFORNIA i> LLOYO NUKES. CITY ENMNF f4nrc *aem fi ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRYCT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 17 U WV` 51 � 4 V� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �`� �• �. jg COUNTY OF BAN BERNARDINO A TR I f6O6 11606 -u, ,16G6- STATE OF CALIFORNIA rav- an LLOYD M18B4 CITY ENGIN ' R q 238n D past 1 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1l ANNEXATION NO. 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w title, LELLOMYO UN3Y OF SAN BEENAF:DINO / ` r To f 3r STATE OF CALIFORNIA m MIBB9 CITY ENGIN: �p/ f? 23Btl3 pTE N PS7,e �w II .t ASSSSSME14T DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMO*TGA / Titlj 0927' 10821"" COUNTY OF SM B IARDINO, in9zzL loess -; BTATE OF CAMPOrtNU, � LLOYD H198S. CITY ENGtNEEp R E2DBffi OAYE ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MA ANNMAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO,1 C Y,ATION NO. 17 1� VYi (qM � M•• j rlr � ,ham � �l.W 7 -_ t....( :z q N +1 MW 0 aw -- wd CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ;.. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO- ,, 4 SPATE OF CALIFORNIA :t 5 N -- a�, tm LLOYD MJ885 CITY ENGIN R RCE2 83 —FA—T— ` pats! C ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA title COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TA J STATE OF CALIFORNIA LLOYO MJBBS, CITY ENGINE RCE.230n GATE N PAL! r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 ANNEXATION NO. 17 S 'Y `.s e• . t i� bFis if Im CITY OF RANCHO cul', MONGA COUNTY OF SAN BEBNAumo STATE OF CALIFORP1Ita j���fj .OYD HU88S. CITY ENGINE •R err �iy. � i 'L P `, G RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCM1 4ONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 17 TO STREET LIGHTIHG MAINTENANCE D1STUCT NO. 1 WHEREA „ on September 17, 1986, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga directed the City Engineer to pake and file vith the City Clerk of sold City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; end IIdEREAS, the City Engineer has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said City Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that said report, nor any part thereof, requires or should be modified In any respect. , NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: a / SECTION 1: That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses Tsafa wor6 and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereoy, preliminarily approved and confined. = SECTION 2: That the diagram showing the Assessment District referred to and described —in said report, the boundaries of the subdivisions of land within said Assessment District are hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 3: That the proposed assesscrnt upon the subdivisions of land In sa sessmsnt District in propnrttdn to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained In said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed. SECTION 4: That said report shall stand as the City Engineer's = Report for —EFo purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district. �w CITY OF QANCHD CUCAMONGA Engineer's Report for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 Annexation No. V For tracts 9649, 11793, 11932, 12601, 12726, 12727 13117, 13203, 11606 -2, 10827 -3, 11626, 10076, 11915 -2, and 13066 SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description This City Council has elected to annex the tracts enumerated in Exhibit •A• into Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1. The City Council has determined that the street lights to be maintained will have an effect upon all lots within said tracts as well as on the lots directly abutting the street lights. Work to be provided for with the assessments established by the district are: The furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operating and servicing of street light improvements on arterial and certain collector streets. Improvement maintenance is considered of general benefit to all areas in the District and cost shall be divided on a per lot basis. In t'.e case of condominiums with airspace ownership only, and apartments, a dwelling unit shall be considered to benefit the same as a lot. SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for street lighting have been prepared by the developers. The plans and street lights are as stipulated in the conditions of approval for the development and as approved by the City Engineering Division. Reference is hereby made to the subject tract map or development plan and the assessment diagram ror the exact location of the street lighting areas. The plans and specifications for street lighting Improvement on the individual nevelopment is hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as If said plans and specifics were attached hereto. Detailed maintenance activities on the street lighting district include: the repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement, providing for the illumination of the subject area. ■ 0 SECTION 4. Estimated Costs No costs will be incurred for street lighting improvement construction. All imprcvements will be constructed by developers. r--ed on available data, it is estimated that maintenance costs for assessment purposes will be as indicated below. These costs are estimated only, actual assessments will be based aii actual cost data. The estimated total cost for Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (including Annexation No. 17 comprised of 11,031 units and 392 9500L street lights, 280 SBOOL lights, and 12, 27,500L lights) is Blown below: 1. S.C.E. Maintenance and Energy: Lamps Lamps Lamp Size* YTD Annexed Rate 9500L 392 30 $10.16 5800L 230 50 8.93 27,5001. 10 2 15.31 *High Pressure Sodium Vapor Lamps Rate Mo's Total 392 X 10.16 X 12 $47,192.64 ' 280 X 8.93 X 12 30,104.80 12 X 15.31 X 12 2 2_6644 2. Costs per dwelling Unit: Total Annual Maintenance Cost $80 109.24 �� 57.25 /year /unit o. o n s r. s r c I1�3I- $7.25 divided oy 12 • 5.60 /mo. /unit Assessor nt shall apply to each lot as explained in Section 6. ,, -fION S. Assessment Diagram Copies of the proposed Assessment Diagrams are attached to this report and labeled •Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 11, Annexation Nu. 17. Tnase diagrams are hereby incorporated within the text of this report. L A56 L SECTION 6. Assessment Improvement for the District are found to be of general benefit to all dwelling units within the District and that assessment shall be equal for each unit. Where there is more than one dwelling unit per lot or parcel of assessable land, the assessment fo each lot or parcel shall be proportional to the number of dwelling units per lot or parcel. It Is proposed that all future developmer,ts shall be annexed to tho a District. i SECTION 7. Order of Events 1. City Council adapts resolution instituting proceedings. 2. City Council adopt, Resolution of Preliminary Approval of City Engineer's Report. 3. City Council adopts Resolution of Intention to annex to District and sets public hearing date. r 4. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and y determines to form a District or abandon the proceedings. R ' 5. Every year in May, the City Engineer files a report with the City Council. i 6. Every year in June, the City Council conducts a public hearing and approves, ar modifies and approves the Individual assessments. + EXHIBIT "A" Properties and improvements to be included within Annexation No. 17 of Street Lighting Maintenance District 1: Annexation No. 17 Arterial TRACT 0 H 580CL 9649 39 5 6 11793 47 12 11932 lu 12801 90 4 12726 29 12727 25 13117 :A2 3 1 13203 1 2 11605 -2 11606 -3 277 11606 -4 11606 -5 10827 10827 -1 321 33 6 10827 -2 10827 -3 11626 83 10076 19 11915 -2 1 13066 27 I TCTAL 1,277 5o 30 2 ; i 4. CITY OF RANCFIO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT CATE: October 1S, 1986 TO: Mayor and "L ers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coieman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL AssESAiENT AND TERRA VISTA cowNITY PLAN request amend the land use map —of' errs VrsU from proposed Junior High School site to Low Medium Rgidential (4 -8 du /ac) for 20 acres of land located on the west side of Rochester, north of Church Street, and various related amendments to the density provisions of the Community Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MO TERRA VISTA PARK DEVELOPMENT AGREEME - supp mental agreement regar ng approx ma y 0 acre site located on the west side of Rochester, north of Church Street. I RECONMENOATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City ounc approve the Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 86 -01 and the First Suppplerjent Agreement to Terra Vista Park Development Agreement No. 1. II. BACKGROUND: The Ettwanda School District and Lewis Homes have o n y app led for an amendment to the Terra Vista Commnity Plan to allow the development of 120 homes on the 20 acre property on the west side of Rochester Avenue. Specifically, the Etiwanda School District is requesting that their property be rezoned from proposed Junior High School site to Low - Medium Residential use. The School District hss determined that when an intermediate school Is needed, it should be located farther to the north and east to better serve the student population. An efficiert method of disposal of the 20 acre property to obtain land more suitable to its student needs (e.g. elementary schools) is for Lewis Homes to obtain the entire 20 acre piece. The proposed Low - Medium land use designation would be compatible with the surrounding Low - Medium Residential designation on &I, adjoining properties. 's 1 6h r_ CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Terra Vista Caa=nity Plan Amendment 86 -01 Terra Vista Park Development Agreement No. 1 October 15, 1986 Page 2 a m Concurrent with the request for the amendment to the I ,'ormunity Plan is a request to u"..6)fy the Terra Vista Park Develolment Agreement 'lo. 1, Section 7, which provides guarantees for the total build -out of Terra Vista. The total number of dwelling lmfts reflected in S. ^ction 7 of the original` Park Agreement woul; be increased to 8.120 it add -range density and 9,330 at maximum .tensity (including density bonus) as a consequence of the rezoning of the school site. This is consi-tent with the 15% affordable housing goal and dtnsity bonus provisions of the Terra Vista Ccmrunity Plan. Copies of the P1ann:ng Commission Staff Report which fully des:ribe the proposed amendments are attached for your information. R City P lanner BD:DC:ns Attachments: September 24, 1986 Planning Commission Staff Report Planning Commission Resolutirns Recommending Approval Ordinance of Approval/Terra lista Community Plan Amendment 86 -01 Ordinance of Approval /Firs*; Supplement Agreement to Terra Vista Park Development Agreement No. 1 _ � ti i f Y. RESOLUTION No. 86 -146 ? - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMEUDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL AGREDW TO TERRA VISTA PARK DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT hh. 1 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMORGA AND LEWIS CONSiCUCTION CO.. INC., A CALIFORNIA CORVORATIOV. WESTERN PRO .IERTIES, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, AND LEWIS DEVELOP14EIT CO.. A GENERAL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, f011owia9 a duly held public mc hearing 1s recoending approval of the First Supplemental Agreement to the City Council; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the provisions of the proposed First Supplemental Agreement are consistent with the City's General Plan and the Community Plan of the Terra Vista Planned Community; NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve to recommend to the City Council approval of ti,: attached First Supplemental Agreement. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. FOMMISSION 01 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAONGA Rancho Cucamonga, douhereby certify thatethe foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September, 1986 by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: BARKER, TOLSTOY, NCNIEL, STOUT NOES: COK41SSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMIS^IONERS: CHITIEA 9 RESOLUTION N0. 86 -14f AN RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOtIMENDING APPROVAL OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 86 -01, TO MODIFY THE CO*iUNITY.PLAN TEXT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SITE TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 DU /AC) FOR 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, NORTH OF CHURCH STREET. WHEREAS, on the 8th day of January, 1986, the Planning Ccmmission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 658S4 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following 1`5 i gs- 1. That the subject property is suitable for ti;e uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan and the Victoria Planned Community. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro ec w not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on September 24, 1986. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommend- approval of Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment ?6 -01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 86 -01 to modify the Community Plan Text as indicated in the attached "Amendlaent No. 2 to the Terra V to Community Plan.- ■ Resolution No. Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 86 -01 Plite 2 a APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1986. { 1, Brad Butler, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of tho Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September, 1986, by the following vote -te -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, HCNIEL, STOUT, TOLSTOY NOES: COeISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA eX A CU k' IV t: to CITY of RANCHO CHCAMOINFA ADMINISTRATION OCT 03 1986 To The city councils AY 7181a1G�llIi21112t319�e 1 am writing this letter on behalf of all the concerned residents of Terra Vista. He as a nelghborhood are appealing the decision made by the Planning Commission on September 24, 1986. We feel they have unjustly decided to keep the Oa -de -sacs open for pedestrian access. This Is the neighborhood in which we live and it is our children we are concerned about, We feel the Planning Commission made its decision on the efforts they put into approving an open cw ®unity in Terra Vista. One where people are free to walk and jog along beautifully landscaped walkways and parks. But this is not of upmout Importance on this case. Safety for our children and security for our homes Ish At the time we purchased our homes, we were told the Cal -de -see would be closed with rod iron fencing like the ones along Baseline Road. We all felt secure with this as we all have small children. After we moves' in, we were informed thlo would be left open for pe- destrian access we feel this open end Cul -de -sac Is unsafe for our children. We have many children on Sundar:ce Drive who are all about the same age. They are delighted to have so many children to play with. They enjoy playing ball, riding bikes and skateboard on the Cul -de -sac area away from the traffic taming through the tract. But with the Cul -ad sac being open, we worry one of them will run out of the Cul -de -sac onto Spruce Avenue. Spruce Avenue 1s a very buoy street with four lanes of traffic We know as the community grows so will the traffic on this street. If we wanted to confine our children to the back yards, we would have bought homes in another location. Wo also feel leaving this Cul -de -sac open, makes us a prime target for burglaries Our house can be burglarized and the robbers will have free access to a.major street making a speedy escape. Having a closed Cul -de sac detours potential burglars /robbers because of the inability to get In and out of the neighborhood in a speedy manner. We are proud and pleased with the beauty of our home end community, and oontt feel that closing the ends of these streets would damage the looks or feeling of openness of Terra Vista Sincerely, Robert J. Brown CD P4! a` .:.41. - O ti ti r r m O r P� �I J D t Gvi1 mT in mT ma OT 00 H-` �V H ti ' -7 N � � I n v s s w I i 2' 'r3@ I I z 10 r N C71 N 0 N ME , I .9 m A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 24, 1980 mn TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission rROM• Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT /HO TERRA VISTA CO.WRINITY PLAN Alt - - IS%ET:GAAUA'SCHOOL DISTRICT----X request amend the Land se�ap of errs vista frog proposed junior high school site to Lox - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for 20 acres of land located on the west side of Rochester, north of Church Street, and various related amendments to the density provisions of the Community Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA PARK DE'_LOPMENT 7iDRFEMEHf— RHO -I -- FIRST- '�RPRCFF!EAT�REEHENT�,� Supplemental lemen agreemen regar ng a apprcx me a y-20 acre site located on the west side of Rochester, north of Church Street. i. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Cooaunity Plan Amendment and uevejOPment Agreement Amendment pertaining to s change in land use designation from a proposed Junior High School site to Low - Medium Residential and issuance of a Negative Declara• ion. B. Purpose: To facilitate the development of residential ui. ts. C. _Surrounding Land Use and 'On'n : or - acan asr-- d n ated —Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). South - Vacant, designated Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 , du /ac) East - Single family residential, designated Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) Nest - Vacant, designated Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). r: D. Site Characteristics: The site is vacant and gradually slopes to e south a approximately 2 to 3% grade. Existing vegetation consists of native grasses and scattered Eucalyptus trees. ' V• 5ry Y `Y A r, i -,r n • �a q ,i PLANNING CGIiNISSIOH FIWF RE..nORT Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment Ter -a Vista Park Develnpment Agreement Amendment September 24, :986 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS• A. General: Thk Etlwanda School District is requesting that their Y a0 ere property an Rochester Avenue be rezoned from school use to Low - Medium Residential use (4 -8 du /ac) The school district has determined that when an Intermediate school site Is neeaed, it should be located farther to the north and east. An efficient method of disposal of the 20 Acre property to obtain land more suitable to its student needs (e.g., e)ermtary :chooW, is for Lafis Homes to obtain the entire 20 acres. In order to sell the land, the 20 acres must lave economic value by providing f,.r a land use designation compatible with that of adjoining properties. 0 inwnit Plan Text Revisions: Lewis Homes of California, co- app cant an FM amendment, has prepared the attached supplemental document to the Terra Vista Community Plan. The pages of the Community ?Ian which deal directly with the subject matter of the 20 acre site are reproduced in their entirety with revised text and graphics. Other relatively minor changes within the Community Plan ire made by reference. C. Number of DwellinS Gaits: the proposed Low- Medium Residential Tend use s gna eon wou'a provide for the development o' 120 homes at the median density of 6 units per acre. This would raise the total mater of dwelling units permfssable within the Terra Vista Community (without density bonus) to 8,120 dwelling units. III. PAWL DEVELOPMENT AGREE M: In conjunction with the Aacndment to the Terra Vista ocean lan text, the applicants are proposing an amendment to the Terra Vista Park Development Agreement No. 1. The Terra Vista Park Development Agreement implements the General Plan and Community Plan with respect to provision of park and open space areas within Terra Vista, and provides a reasonable balance between parka and housing as the Terra Vista Planned Community and ensures that park land in the amount contemplated in the General Plan and Community Plan will be available in foe Planned Coomnity as it develops. In addition, tie agreement contains a clause which states that 'he City shall net undertake to reduce the Planned Community base density at mid -range density as originally adopted in the Community Plan below 8,000 dwelling units. Further, the Agreement acknowledges that the Communif;; Plan specifies that the total number of dwelling units within Terra Vista shall not exceed a. 9,200 units (including density bonus units). l PLANNINS COPWSSION STAFF RFPgRT Terra Vista Community Plan L.ardment Terra Vista Park Development Agreewnt Amendment Septesber 24, 1986 Page 3 The First Supplemental Agreement to Terra Agreement I.e. 1 would amend Section 7 Agreement to increase the Planned Couaunit range density to 8,120 units and specify ti dwe ling units within Terra Vista shall not density. The revis!d ficure of 3,338 refli 15% of the 5,120 units at mid -range density amended plan. This is corsistert math the goal and density bonus provisions of the Plan Vista Park Oevetoprent of the original Park y base density at mid - mat the total number of exceed 9,33e at meximum !cts a density bonus of in accordance with the 15: affordable housing Terra Vista'Comunity IV. EHVIRD : &{WAL ASSESSMENT: As a result of the Initial Study,' the Trn ec. w-TTM,7s —u i'T an alteration of the density and growth rate of the population on the 20 acre site, and generate additional vehicular traffic and demand for new street construction when the property develops. The additional traffic generated by the 120 dwelling units is not significant and can be accmmmcdated by the planned circulation. system within and around the Terra Vista Planned Comunity. V FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The subject property 1s suitable for the proposed land use 1A to a, of access, size and c"atibility with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding ereas. Fiji ther, the�proposeo change will not have a significant impact on the envi•onment or rurrounding properties and 1s to substantial oriormance with the General Plan YI CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a Public Hearing in �_ effort newspaper, the property p ^ated, and notices were sen tt �FLtP+ prropeFU owners within 300,feet of +bed project site. VII RECOMiENDATION: Staff reccaaerds that the Planning Commission co.;idu_U_a__l7u5T1c Hearing to review the proposed amendment dnd receive pubitc input. If the Commission can support the Facts far Findings, then adoptic,, of the attached Resolution, recommending Approval t. the City Council and issuance of a Negative Declaration would he a repriate Res ctfull,_subwitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:OC:ns .rr /y O PLAh71ING COINi[SSIQN STAFF REPORT Terra Vista Comwnity Plan Amendment Terra,Vista Park Development Agreement Amendment ` Septe&%)er 24, 1986 _ Page 4 Attachments: Letter from Etiwanda School District Exhibit "A "• - Site Plan ' Mended Crnity Plan Text E Graphics Terra Vista Park Development Agreement Ho. 1 First Supplemental Agreement Resolution of Approval/Terra Vista Community Plan Amendment 86 -01 Resolution of-Approval /First Supplemental Agreement to Terra Vista Park Development Agreement 1 /(V J. i R� I `r r A C P.O. Box 248, EBwanaa, California 91739 p14t 899 -2451 May 13, 1986 — RECEIVED -- Hr. Den Coleman, Senior Planner CRY OtRAN�N1%0 Dworo ONO, Community Development Departmeat City of Rancho Cucamonga 1ANt 191986 9320 -C Base Line Road phi Post Office Box 807 %8i9tIUl11.L7(1rQ.3i4!5i6 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Hr Coleman: SUBJECT: REQUEST, FOR CBANCE OF ZONE The Etivanda School District hereby requests that our 20 -acre property on Rochester Avenue, south of Base Lino Road, be rezoned from acbocl une to iow Medium Residential use (four t•o eight duelling unite per acre). This prcpetty has been indicated in verious City plena as the future site of an intereedfate school. Our Board bus determined that ve will not need another Sntermedinta school for coma yeu,ts, and that when one is needed, it should be located farther to the north and east We do, hrvavor, have an immediate need for =to elementary schools, and it Is the Board's policy to own the land before any school is built We have, thercforo, developed a plan to acquire elementary school ultes from four major developers by excbsnglrg this 20 act= for their land. Th-s exchange is the only feasible means available to us for acquiring the elementary school alter due to complexities of state lass related to school district - owned property To make the asx :hange work, the 20 acres moat have economic value, i.e., It must be developable, If we sell the land (Instead of "Changing it), under lha law. it would hove to be zoned similarly to the property around LL While we prefer to exchange the land rather than to sell it, the same reasoning applies We are, therefore, raquesting Law Medium Residzntial use, since the property around the 20 acres is zoned for that use. .1, Board of Trustan R d (Jerry) Brealru f Gary R Collins David W. long Cvlelon P. Ughtfoot Marshall B. Pruitt Sup.,w4endant / ,v Cecilia Sotodo C C Hr Dan Coleman, Senior Planner Hey 17, 1986 Page Two This zone change wil! make the school land compatible with the Terra Vista Planned Community which surrounds the property. While we understand that Lewis Homes and the City have an agreement regarding the overall residential density of the areas new designated for residential development In Terra Vista, our property has never been previously identified as developable land. We ate simply seeking a change of zone for our own property because it will not be developed as a school. However, it is im- portant that the rights of Levis Hanoi to develop Serra Vista as previously planned not be infringed upon by your action'vith regard to our 20 acres. Levis Homes is trying to help the Etivanda School District by participating in, and basically providing the finaneing.for, the land exchange. This is so evan though the immediate benefit Pill be not to Levis Homes, but to the othe- developers involved and the District. Therefore, we strongly advocate that the duelling units on this property be approved in addition to the present target of 9,200 units in Terra Vista. It is important that Lewis Rom" sot end up worse off by helping us, not only on groundi of fairn'esa, but also because the land exchange plan will not work otherwise. We would anticipate 120 limes to be developed eventually on this pto- party, at the median density of mix units per acre. This does not represent an increase in hamm for the District as a whole, mate a similar number of homes will not be built at the location outside of Terra Vista which we eventually select for the future intermediate school. Therefore, this zone change will have no negative effect on our ability to house students; lascoad, It will have a great positive affect on our scL -+1 development program. We hope that the enclosed application can be prgcoased quickly. We ask that any fees be waived. Please Call me if you have any questions or if you need anything further from us. CPL: rg Enclosureo '�/J},�verr�yy truly yours, Carleton P. Light er Superintendent it r �nr tcaa•F -nmw s V Dr. I r + ` i2u'1 ` rz mI& u osi A4 VALA[.Ti QC��.+61F�A.ftp1 f{�N ��L7I:ID �j CWcwc: S AN fir. /: 1 hl/ -TOO. I tB+�oS I i Lou. HF-0, >� ViVAWr Lli PIED. azi ar:v. sasr. , b oJerr VAcaaur - - -7oua fx+uut�+,KY LI,1� � O Icu aaa (y NUM 74M dK7ij CITY Or ITC,i. _ AA5Vc4Wr Ore/ 4. RAINCHO CL:C N'lO \GA TITLE, `1fSa PLANNING DIVISION L \IiIIUT�_,�SG1LG_a.2�lflcf�'� _'r�� ■". 0 i1 � k v ■! b m .01. u C 0 �d vw ;t il1 L i YAIPI 1 f m = W c °- < y U F LL F O fn n � c o n < U J A E a o $ o 2 `WH o s < N ON i t m o« u N o > ^uLaLC n L o.# arnL AL C d Ydq L L L �iorL -a m C.. EdE C N y C £i a9int E X >01� o o N L L d E N A OI # N L_ Y L C A N' C •' # O a E N A< a C q Cw o «Ea A r L U uayc««o, —ow ` ouEv=& V A O q� w L L a E N9o�•, 0o U! FUq «u�iCF« p «— L •r U C O r�i q L O y O C C �( C n 0 dY�00• �L d O Y _ �.A..d AL �j L N N 1 N U d E L a O C Z p• _= A> C � G U w �= « N 2 E ` O W .. _ A_N L c Oo. A",N d oa M -0 N Y 3 N Y 3 9 N N> N U V N 8 N q N A # O Y Y 3 a N= �'� N L >_N _YN A N # V E Y A tltl EU'=U= O 00— O _ Y y gy � a . aLO #_ d L YI O g r L N 0 . A d d ~« E • C N 6 y N tr d Y Y ��9 w.L• >G_ �C.d, tn9d CN VL q•0G _O LS VSE Y Y L� L F VF W« N y W L 9 O V > u •Ai N L �w0 0 u$uv o:« `C N y�C •`.VC Uu um q N L g N O O: R O Z d N� w O� A O V 0.9 C UV V C V E 4 Z N> N C A W « q �' Y >. A Y L 'p « '• L< 4 () , t Y o .mod. o f ;OO'' 61 C q#o N A V AC NAOyC NV E`�1 q>. >OI A•^= tlOCW 9� «r Y {y, .�i a# O. N O� L C Cl Y « u O C Y ZS o _ L UgCN«CgN ddb ~`0e OL dC U&' «,CAU LIM Y09«L 0-6 ~d�0WUUT7 «�aCN~ OE Ojw OL4N 0 d.0 �UUa N g N .. h _« l C F• Y M A_ F• G.- OJ V N V V! Y ti qq FG MIZ Y W v d r N e E I u M P a V d U E L u'C u N� C N N �yy Y O p p m E u « c o 1 I A Y v y p M3: u u C � N W r N 1 1 1 Y F N A Y 9E,e a b° an co,E 4U W6 • • • �5 A rn m ca cm a o a Svc C9 y Q C mV- � p .Wt '".c u e in e o li C q we r p y C N N N n N E 8 > `o a U M N v < Y N � O L W = %. q IW n . O • Q • W O. • N L WJ V.. C. C • b A F C ^� pt 61 =i. 1� I d ^ 1 1 !tJJ ` C —•O+n � 1 � h. WYi Y O tl0 m O m9 m CI m OW CN 4• O Y O m itT /oP P 00 QI qpl M= M pP 01 A � Y RI �COoI q� Ft� �, 1 N uo 3 �. • • • • s • • • s F.1 e • • i 5i 7 4`.• ��1 i' n ��. Vim•' W Q I L L OIL I I I pl Ol°iLa J„" ;L�C C a V C N- Z.r EEE Y_ a E N o 3 v ao. b qC q ulNj 3«L � J`y1�1� �L�in �•C«Cmcl~ COR ENJ SGj.' in 'm Oz N >�NL_ Ol��rn —9 ctrn ° c G —r C- N pIN OI y� N J d C J NL S•+C L >•-V NL�ES.p$`on Qu i}9 mC•�g3m Y V �� L d 0 9 ug c—In 9i m t: �.0 LLpN NAIL C1 Jm F'aC 9.T.t LL ;C1C s E� f s .e Z h t� W •T' 6 a` V {L NC°0 I L � 6Fqu- UMOUdg BE O p C g L 8 L L J p� E « r E c S o o r d N« N was utm E C U C 2.0 3C L o n `8 F ogOJ N J C L > L LL o d L LL NI'�91 C —�RLI mc«Y, °Ta 1 6 -aaNL U OIa WvU Ea GF m —L eV q` O 7 U I V m C — I.m+ }J 8 3 pLo u —C pN q 0p N 0 « L E U reya « E o C Y d C Y O V q q r� n; O O Y C N �• NLassc _ 9 J t J a E o c9iLw00C r C1 —�O O C rn aE N q p O C C 3 wI _N Y c g c vO 5 L O V L' O 8gLYLCr N UO C� E c q L 9 o ~ W 0.d a N q df'O.dq�.7 O 3 $uuI u0.o $Hak r� Cp.T9. L0. 0 —o�~ Ul g C o o 0 1X01 f ly /7� Z W C Ti IL, W p�W J p N L°� >a y u y E « C J $INiIEL u li 0 q O Y 9 j. C d FF qU C C « W Y q N > a" C „E m_ L — m Ira r C U. «C k m Uumo O Y c m V C 1 0 W !A T L C J � W ,O p Q z w _ y V c - ] O ¢ Q Q � N l�.•��� � m Z� U z w¢ v I ! O O' ON I I I I � I 4 +' I I I n w � z \ t < O � o w 1 IF "Z W ',� 1-77 e -� U •c Z « E MAY /4wY+oY C W u? ¢ 3 C I a 8 g MAY wAM MAY uaASH 8 2 Z W Q C W E E u ? � � 0 E E1 9 I L O19 >.q " v �V rnNY 0 C L r In >• N• >, O Y E d C U q C d q C uu'°,]Ch ] ]d q° c is • >$�3°�1° Nw 001$ O« u �- ° c GcNU f"C o u. Lw «cIN�NE.N Tro q «uaI_ du ��q ° -if CN qu 3OrnN 5.1 E 3« Q1 ] v N fJ' q NLrnG« 0 10 OpL ]$ bEEN co N 0�« 'o >,qu` qj i° rn> w. > 1a�o v m j dqu oguo mm Im cGC` - O ]roc.± °E U U 6 o u i1 A q5L� v —« aY > M 2 0 ° d E to m G w 3 �� E huN,:,o N1 0 io d v1 =_o `a A d ua3ma 4``4 E. ' «uE c,`o_ggdc94 ,�, 'D o 9 0 CL —•o .°. «d .2 Fu- q C l0d Zo .�9 ] EAd°j UNUb`•Nq O.° V 0OI« v « • J U> dNt' lN•q O�jh q N q O {{• 2i C gOO1N 1�pW y �V l L— «LL O•t_ >~.�° j L c C q V C, i N.�.r O0 1 ; E U X a C— o1q— C rn L - aa3.. q °0 worn U ` E «g q 1�1yy^ L L Q q 73C1V R 3 r T] C"L L •'C C 0 ItCcGG ^9.G ~ YN` ..1 aNi�CIL L Io..O7 Yj9 L L 10 cENga o «u�q.. hau ga • • h hu� • .y 1. 3 C L t, U cool Fin$ CO 8 �s O� /%% C m L� N L. o Gy Z 9 t �V. E D O S W M7+J N_ q� tt �O o gill Iy CO 8 �s O� /%% C m L� N L. o Gy Z 9 t �V. E D O S W M7+J N_ q� tt �O o 1 m� N>.O �- L� N Lt L Or L I � 'OC°aa:: °pr °U: uo« j[4aNL CCLmC rv�aun ° C l N N •'• L p m i. 3 N L A u <'C A a N° a l a 3±]m_^T°..uc &&J: --. Eoc>. — ;� .r voy c o a O` -Nr A ac CoLOt"NC Zo"Oft. YC « Ada U 0 "' N N Y U N m .O 10 cz'm o N1:L yuJNLdCAi ocad L.OVO]C ]C '0 C ° OCn C ] p ix Y.m.aA3aM °x «H R� a]d EEO_L a0� m 04 '� -ND OmOAC C yGL..mY >.C._C C V m t L -> m ^• o U m C p L O m L ] C- L m] a C R.2 - SP.ImmO Oo dOEUE u aL •"00 Oq nE naL c D�O.aL ]`UIr °NUN �'N'--6000'2 EO.�C. 80 ou 3 .m u o N? _.a O 7:.. NAC N dN°'a.lm 3O .+u ` - �>,�Lii prm v- mY �- q U N a L U- == 'am O A r L L« a V u U U« m O. O1 C a p Mmo'L w q.L- q= 10N9�A� ~C'' «CCg3o dN]uo L MOpa «LUVm4rym•%]> ULC: o- °yml " n4m v CL UO t °ur «q>•u- °u�Lm�]dm,.L; N>.u; 01 nc -oDmo> c« mo o ona uc`' .c' n"0 O(i`a>. E, oL 1]^ •- `cow A- d« V U` N 9 a 0-0 N ro g E o ° m- 13 a- O° V C 9 n L na c Om m uLO U Q'o LCL UL•°" Nm 30: CL RN v u`?y'u c„a a «] com m3« aE„ u n C a V _ 21 y ° O N q c L d 3 N t a ._ L _m «agog nvL t°i.°.Yaa°m UVci�O� E)ny�1«,� «" L.3 N°Y- A`•adN- •° «pau °J C3�Lga�O NO. ]C`« Y Yrnp1 _> L J G L« > p Y m C N O n N_ n U N d C yC «VL >.0 LO o�9q V'- icno�Edmd E6jm maaac -a..L A�m.Om O.�M3E a2 U NOm. o «f O'Mu]iu� { - «qq�6 p I m° L ML YdNL U «Ld a °NL� !•mm ,p «V TNL 0 U 4 q^ O T E E r p L sL mEXC. > xE c0 CL `Eo j Eam 9 C O1O � U-0 no c C N; y N o 0 3 n =°� °o EN •$ V O ,,. L I. G 0' 60 N !J ° N C iD�°Eee -%t3 C Y d N 3 u i T A u o- L N L V A Q C N a O L `m m =m `ovS> a L • 1° 1 V L A N N L O s uaj nil Terra Vista Part DerelcMent Agresettnt no. 1 (the'Agreemat') Is old* LAI 916 day of 'J ;,,, , 1981, by and between LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO.. INC.. a California corporation, MESTEM PROPERTIES. a general part6er- ship. LEWIS HONES OF CALIFORNIA. a general partnership, and LEWIS OEVELOMEM CO., a general partnership (hertfnafter collectively referred to It 'Lewis'). and the CITY OF PARCMU CUCAMONGA. a Municipal cotpo,ltfon (berefnafter referred to the - :fly -) RECITALS A. The City of Rancho Cucaeen98 I. an Inoolporated general law city existing under the laws of tL State of Callfomfa. B. Lewis contrail certain real property within the City Mich Is known as Terra Vista and Mich is referred to hvefn as the -PI anned CommlV' This Planned Comunity Includes an am cf land beginning at IN* fngrtectlan of Wren Aveml and Foothill Boulevard; thence traversing north along the centerline of Haters Aveme to the south right of war of the Pacific Electric Rallroad; thence east to the easterly boundary of the Bev Creek Flood Control Chanml; thence southwesterly along said boundary to the centerline of Bate Line Raid; thence east to the centerline of Rochester Avenue; thence south to the cen"arl"' of foothill Bouleeerdl thence oust to the be9i6nin9 point, being the lnter•ection of Raven AVemie Ind foothill Boulevard. C. On the 16th day of February, 1963, the City adopted OrdfAanoe No. 190, ADprcrin9 Pll"ed Cemunity Zone no. e1 -01 for the Development of the Pla"td Camunity. By that •ctlon Me City Council established That develupmnt within Terra Vista Should to 'regulated by the adopted Planned CamunIty Tut entitled Terra Vista and in part by the Rancho Crauongo Zoning Drdln;nce.• That toot Shall hereinafter be referred to as the 'Caaunity Plan'.. n yea / o / C O 0474 RECORDING REQUEST 7t T, Ah0 WHEN RECORDED. ACT= TO: •j' 1 H LUIS el ga AtIm: 6176: Legal Dena Alamo /T��� M un 1196 N. Mountain A•eriut Poet office boa 670 bland. G 917'16 -0670 TERRA VISTA PARR DEVEIOPNENT AGREE4ENT NO 1 nil Terra Vista Part DerelcMent Agresettnt no. 1 (the'Agreemat') Is old* LAI 916 day of 'J ;,,, , 1981, by and between LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO.. INC.. a California corporation, MESTEM PROPERTIES. a general part6er- ship. LEWIS HONES OF CALIFORNIA. a general partnership, and LEWIS OEVELOMEM CO., a general partnership (hertfnafter collectively referred to It 'Lewis'). and the CITY OF PARCMU CUCAMONGA. a Municipal cotpo,ltfon (berefnafter referred to the - :fly -) RECITALS A. The City of Rancho Cucaeen98 I. an Inoolporated general law city existing under the laws of tL State of Callfomfa. B. Lewis contrail certain real property within the City Mich Is known as Terra Vista and Mich is referred to hvefn as the -PI anned CommlV' This Planned Comunity Includes an am cf land beginning at IN* fngrtectlan of Wren Aveml and Foothill Boulevard; thence traversing north along the centerline of Haters Aveme to the south right of war of the Pacific Electric Rallroad; thence east to the easterly boundary of the Bev Creek Flood Control Chanml; thence southwesterly along said boundary to the centerline of Bate Line Raid; thence east to the centerline of Rochester Avenue; thence south to the cen"arl"' of foothill Bouleeerdl thence oust to the be9i6nin9 point, being the lnter•ection of Raven AVemie Ind foothill Boulevard. C. On the 16th day of February, 1963, the City adopted OrdfAanoe No. 190, ADprcrin9 Pll"ed Cemunity Zone no. e1 -01 for the Development of the Pla"td Camunity. By that •ctlon Me City Council established That develupmnt within Terra Vista Should to 'regulated by the adopted Planned CamunIty Tut entitled Terra Vista and in part by the Rancho Crauongo Zoning Drdln;nce.• That toot Shall hereinafter be referred to as the 'Caaunity Plan'.. n yea / o / C O 0474 Q (q Terre Vista 0eveloPSent Agreenint no. 1 Page t 0. Lewis stets to develop the Planned Cammlty In Me manner cento- plactd by the Community PTsn and by law, W d.cires that the City, acting through Its Council, Page certain deteninotfms and drclslons regarding the development of the Piaimed Community which are related W the exercise of City Dwell pursuant to the h•aurity plan and the Municipal Code. E. Article 2.5 of Chapter c, Chinon 1, Title 7 of the California Goverment Code consisting of sections 65861 - 65269.$ authorizes the City to enter into binding development agreements for the development Of veal Property with Persons having legal or equitable Interests in such property. Lewis and the City desire to enter Into a development 49retmnt with respect to develoPAtnt of Mbl lc and pri• tte park and ncreetltnal area In Terra'YISta'ind proceedings have been uadertatrn in eeemlianee with applicable ,vim, regulable,. and In% City and Lewis acknowledge that the Code states chat a development agreement $ball conalln, among other things, terry and conditions related to 'the permitted uses of the property, the density or Intensity of use, the "allies blight and site of proposed buildings, and Provisions for resenatien or dedication of land fo• public purposes.' The topics of permitted uses of the Terra Vista property. blight and site of buildings, as well as nlereatien or dedication of land for putllc Purposes (except for the public part and recreational areas affected r'y this Agrtemant). are net relevant to the Subject matter heroin contained and therefore an nit inCluead In this Agneetnt. vas between thmseives the parties Intend to be contractually bound and desire that the Provlafens of 491etrtnt be governed by that Article 2.5, and they therefore valve any objections regarding the sufficiency Of this Agreement with respect themes. The City acknodedCes that uy els<ttrq to enter Into contractual a9remAts such as this one. Me ebllgetlms of Mich Mall %arrive beyond Me teem or tares of the pnlent City Council embal.S. the% Such action will %In@ to bird the City and futon C%uull$ to the obligations undertaken In such agnamsnt, and $hall limit future txarclte of certain yoverraental and proprietary powers of the City. A p 3 W I.r, Tern Vista (11"I'Aant Agrees,,, no. 1 Page j The terns and conditfbns of this Agreement Hare been found by City Council to be fair, Just, and nnovbles and the Agreement is thereby intended to biM Lewis am the City for Its dnratiCA. G. in obligating the City pursuant to this Agreement, the City Council has elected to exercise certain govanemtel And proprietary powers, and In exercising these Parrs At the present list. rather than deferring such exercise to stem undacermined future date. the City Council era datermirm that the City Is acting Within the law and within the pcnRn granted p.nuant to the California Constitution led statutes yrowigattd thereunder, and has concludtd Nat the non sec Interests of the City and Its cittsens, as well as considerations related N public health, sefeth, maifare. and enjoyment will be test served by this course of action. W. the City tithe, N facilitate Iglementatill of Its Ga,enl Plan and Ne Cormmity Plan. The etments of thil ' Ireenent An demand to be major and Important steps In furtherance of cororehemin pla -ning objectfess contained within those dotMatt. The planning ohje<thes which are advanced through this Agreement Include the City's gods: (1) N Pros NO part .red open loan ..... foe terra Vista (2) N "rorlds a 19410n4111e balance between parts and housing As Ne Terre Vista •leaned Community dmelOPS, (T) N Insure I It partLnd In the amount contemplated In the General Plan and Ceaantty Plan will be available in W Planned Camm.,tlt as 't dnelopt without ret,rd N the outcM of future t ltlgat'on or legislation which might resoit In changtng the orlpfml intent of the part and open space concept wen it not for t,.e prorlslnss of Oil Agreemnt. I. Tin' Cit Council his fcrnd that this lgree mnt Is ^snsista.t with the Gwra. ►`an of tN City and the Conunity plan of Ne Terra Vista Plapred Cltamlalty. ,. r % 0.3 - t1a; Terra Vista Developed,, Age,Ment d. 1 lag. & J. On Inn" & . Igdd, the City Council of Rancho Cuuaong& adopted Ordlmn:e No. = approving this Ten& Vista Put Develnp,ent Egne- ant Ns. I and authorizing the undersigned hayor and City Clerk to taecute ssa and by that action bind tM City thereby. Said Ordinance took effect T. 1" RCN, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE K111JAL COVERAATS AND AGREEPIENTS HEREIN CONTAINED AND OTHER GCOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATIONS, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. This Agreement shall be effective and the obligations of the parties hereunder shall arise only as of the Effective Date of City Ordfmnn No. 1717 . (hereinafter referred m at the 'Effective Date') which Ordinance authortzst the City to enter slid this Agreexcent, and shall Laminate thirty (10) year, thenafur or at such other tim as my be zoned upon by the parties This Agreement is entered Into by Levis In order to desist the City In satisfying the planning objectives of the General Plan and the Cceamity Plan and In consideration of me City exercising certain goverranul and proprietary powers at the tied of execution of this Agreeant rather than at soee future date. 2. rho City canftres It hex *dotted and agrees It will adoinlster according to Its taro that certain Park Implesenutim Plan for T.nA Vista attached hereto as Exhibit 'A' and incorporated werein by this reference. hentrditer refentd to as as 'Park Plan- 3. Levis agrees u dedicate and /or reserve far part and recreational Purposes certain areas In the Planned Cmnity according to the provisions of this Section S of this Agreeednt. It is agreed that park exaction reguirecenu for the entire Planned Coamunity, pursuant to the General Plan, he Cocremlty Plan, City 14niclpal Code Section 10.7', of any suppleaantal laws. ngul&ticns, or policies are, and shall be. binding on both Imis and the City n specified 11 the Park Plan. 4 '(1 ton Vista Cerelopeent Agreement no. I Page 5 7.1 If the estlated Terra Vista population Computed bated on expected rest .entisl density as Calmed in Section 66477(b) of Me Govsrrsent Cede Is projected to be higher or lower than anticipated, reyci, rants far If* purt.or of the planned Cooeontty not yet developed shall a Increased or decreased, rot rare often than biannually, to the turner described In the Part Plan. 3.1 In the event that Certain density bonuses are granted at a result of agremxnts by owls or any other bul:der In Terra yltta to bull. affordable residential hwsirg, or for and other reason, any areas included In such residential develapmntt which oeallfY to vote that onject't private open spate repulrastnt pursuant to this Agreemnt :all not be deeded 0 be an Incentive provided pursuant to Govammlt Code Sectlon MIS at IM. by the City for affordable tausing. Nothing in this Agrermmt tall be construed as prohibiting the City from waiver of part exaction requlre%,nti for Affordable housing projects. c. Each party agrees tat so inns as the oiler party Is not in breach or default of the prwlalons of this Agreement it will forever abide by provisiens of the Part Plan regardless of changes In law. Lewis hereby waters any close shot the park dedication and igrovectnt repWrements established hontn ay be in sacra of what ay be legally required by the City. Each party further further agrees, so long as the other It not 'n breach or default of the provltlons of MIS Agrestent. rat to participate, except to defend itself, In any litigation related to the Pare Plan or this Agreement In a role adverse to the other. S. City shall review this Agretant at least coca during every twelva- mnth (12-mnth) period following the Effective bate hereof, in acordan.e with Goesrdeent Code Section 65665.1. 6. City specifically agrees that It as tm right or potter whaticever to require Cowls is begin development, or continue development ance / F-5- terra Vista Dtvelapeent Ag,m,, a,. t peg, 6 begun, of the Terre Vista planned Coceunity, and that the part and recreational dedication reguirteentt Of StCtlon ] of this Agrterent w9l Only of at in tl.e dealt and to the aaant that the planned Coaamlty is actually developed. 7. This Agreemnt shall be enforceable and perforeed acwding to its tams. And shall be governed by the part plan 11 the fore Incorporated herein, notwi Nstenaln9 any pubs Mtftt tunICAMS which lay alter or Sand City's rules, regulations, or polltteS gevemn9 putland cadlotion or favalopeant. Curing toe period of this Agreaeent the City shall 'rot U dertata to reduce the planned tactually bite density at aid -range density a originally adapted In the Carnality plan below M dwelling units. The parties ICaaow1e19* that Na Catiounity pile SpAcifits taut the total n,*er of dwelling ualu In Terra Vista shall not exceed "Ina thousand SAO hundred (9,200) units. hotwlthstanding the fortTOfng, havever, Lmis and the City my at any It" in the futua aetually agree In wr1019 to aeerdants to ties Coeuu"fly plan and/or this Agrttant regarding any of the pmt,j ns t",,,,ad , ar,l'.. 6, in the cent of alleged default or bmcb of any tam or Conditions of this Agr*eeent. the party alleaf,,g such dial[ or breach mall give the other party nat tam thin thirty (30) cup' rotia, in wrltlaq (W 'first aotlal- SW- Ifying the Tatum of the alleged default and ae maer In A101 such default my be satisfactorily cured, In the event such breech or default Is not cured during such Period. the run - defaulting part) my enforce Ws Agreement by arbitration as provided herein, or by bringing an action In law or em ity, and the parties agree that .Ubj,ct to the Itwitatlons rantalmd In Sectloa 6 hereof 'pacific ptrareanca shall be an appropriate needy to to sought. 9. In the event that aq sate ar federal aw or regulation *acted, adopteJ, or interpreted after the data of Nis Agrteeant, or juditat datemlation or other Action or any go,grrednal entity rat undar the Control of City. tall 01051. prevent or preclude Coeplarpe with any Rev. 05M 'Co (� . Terra vista OnelopeantAgreenant ra. I page p of the provisions boreal, such p "visiant shell nenrtheless only be excused, AN shall Daly be ndlfled or suspendtd, to the extent and for the time necessary to athtere any mandatory campllance with said law, regulation, deteroimatton mar other gerernzantal action, am the reaming provisions of this Ag"ela nt shall be in full force And effect. Upon repeal or tnvallditlon of said taw, regulation, dater. mination or other gosermentat Action or occurrence of other circcm• stances reen"Ail the affect thereof upon this Agreaent, the provitions hereto shall be restored to Nair full original effect. 10. the parties agree that this Agreement still not bind any lender Presiding cmistructlon or permanent flm"InS for any tepreremnts In the planned Carpenter, her any developer of non. residential subdlrl• slons no prarisfon hereof shall detest, render Invalit or limit any martgsge, deed of trust, or similar [.cushy, Inten$• .pprltablt to Such trprorement3 or development, and the partfe$ agree to negotiate In good faith to modify any of Ns provsslons of this Agreement bused OR reasonable requests by the other part,, lending Institutions, title companies, band counsel or similar Categories of Interested persons. 10.1 At the time Lewis is entitled to obtain building permits for any wart of construction fn Terra Vista, end upon wrfttan request, ! .1 the City '111 i"Ut In a fore suitable for recordation a Cortifi. esG of Co.plfanct with "'pact to the rot property to be to fapre•ed. The Grtf /luta o: Coeplfance $hall constitute, end shall o state, conclusive determination or satisfactory cradle— "tan of the requirements of this Agreement with respect to the property to which it relates. After lssuanct of such Certificate Of CoepllAnae, whf cis issuance may not be unreasonably withheld, any party then awning mar thuealter purchasing, leeslrq, or otherwise acq'Irinq any interests lu said property $hall het IACgr any obligation or liability under this Agreement. 11. Eitur party may elect to srbltrata Any dispute arising under this ry Agns- -rut. In tee Arent of such .,.[Hare, the procedure of tale Section that] constitute A binding and unAppolAble procedure Ear ;r Cb 0 OefeloMent A9revent Ito. I page d arbitrating and "solving any such dlsNte. Election of either party / to arbitrate shall be ude by filing A demand In writing with the other party. Tha demand shall be bide within twenty (20) days after Me occurrence of Na ,rent causing the dispute, or within tan (10) days after the first wrltGn nottce by either party that further negotiation Is unlikely to "suit in a coeprew'te "solution of the bitter. If Lewis and the City agree on the selection of An arbitrator, then shin bt only one Arbitrator, If All 49 "went is reached within ten (10) day% after demand Lr arbitration, there shall be three (3) arbitrators, one nun: N writlrg by Lewis and a second by City and a thin chosen by the two who an appointed. if the two so chosen sonnet 49"44 on A third within ten (10) days themfter, either party uy petition the Son bem4nlno County Superior Court N appoint an arbitrator, who In that event rust be a former California Saperlor Court Judge. If there is one arbitrator, his decision shill be bindings If them are three arbitrators, the decision of any two of Ns shall be binding. N One $hilt act as an arbitrator who is in Any way financially Interested In the work or business affair, of either party. Should either Lewis or the City "fuse or neglect to appoint aA arbitrator within twenty (20) days after the Initial demand for arbttratioa or to furbish the arbitrators with any necessary papers or fnforutton, the arbitrate", due or core, appointed in cosalfanca with this Sectiono are tsoownd by both parties to proceed is pert,. The decision of the arbitrators shall be final The •rbltraton, If they to den, on authorized to award to the party, whoa conttntlon 1s upheld Such aura as they dim proper for the ties, apenst, and trouble Incident to the appeal, and. If the appeal was. taken without r alcnable cause, dopes for delay. The arbitriton %hail fix their own coapnatION unless otherwise agreed on,i'aN %hail saes$ the cats and charges of the arbitration on signor or bath parties rr r, To "A .IatA pert] oxen AS. Wont bas. I page 9 It. less Agreernt upon bac"Ing effective In No canner herein providedo constitutes the 1010 and only 1911M."nt between the Pirtle$ AS to the subject natter hereof, and is Intended by asch to Constitute the final ` written emorandoe of all of their s9reteents and understandings In this transaction. No covenants, warranties. aoi /pr representations. express or irplled. and no profit$ or prior alraeaants whatsoever have been Sete, agreed to, or entered Into by the parties which are rot expressly set forth hareln% and if either party his atteeoted to ease such covenants. warranties. and /or representations, preselect. or prior agrecaents, the yr are each superseded hereby and valved. 13. The parties hereto are ectirg as Independent entities and this Agree- event shall not constitute a partnership. agency, or other business relationship between or extend thee. 14. All notices and depends which my or are to be required sr perwitted to be given by either party to Oe oti.ar hereunder shall be in Wit - Ing• All notins and deeardt ay be personally carved or shall be sent by United State% nail, pottage prepaid. addressed to tht address herein designated or to such other place as a party my fro$ Clear to tlw designate in a rends given in accordance with this paragraph. IS. Each provision contained herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, successors, executors. Adainlstrators, and assigns of all the parties hereto. 15. In the event of any action c- proceeding brought by any party 4911rit any other under this Alroecante the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable cost$ and upenstt Itcluding the fees of its attornyt In such action or proceeding in such incuat as the court easy adjudge reasonable as attorneys' fee, whether or sot the proceeding continues to judgeent. 11, Tire Is of the assent for each provision of this Agreetent of which t1V Is in eldmnt: Terra rhea Days (?",t Agrearnt co.. 1 rat m 18. The Recitals to this A9,eeeenl are i.Kn. h..tlN err.•- , na this reference wade a part hereof 19. This Agnev.tnt, or a eemrsnoAx tncrmt, in a r „m acccotable to the parties hereto, %hall be recnrdcd in the Official P.ecardl of the County of San Bernardino within •tn (10) dart after the Effective Cate hereof. 20. E+cePt as to Mutters tapressly provided for herein, and noNithltand- f'9 the Provisions of Goverment Code Section 65666, all rule?• regulations• and official policies governing pereitted uses of ISM and governing design. Immewnt. and construction ctandsrds and specifications applicable to the planned eoewurmlty, are subject to change by City in the warmer otherwise provided by law. IN WITNESS WxEREOF, the parties htnto have executed this Agreement to be effective an the date herein provided. • 'LMii' r LEWIS COIISTRUCTIGU CO., INC. LEWIS OEYELOMENT CO.. a California corporation a general RRanerlMR 1158 M. M?untaln Avenue 1156 M. Itoun In Avenue Pmt Mice BOA 670 Peft ,IO 6 C ✓6 • Upland, CA 91186.0670 Upla6d, 9178 - C67p�� I • By: m By l % c3 real ant f to gent By: S Q�ll.Gfi / lit° t ttanc ecreta WESTER% PROPERTIES, LEWIS KPIES Of CALIFORNIA, a Central partnership a 9antrsl partrership 1156 M. Mountain Avene 1156 M• Mountain Avenue Pert Office Bt. 670 Past Office Boa 670 Upland, CA r Upland. CAA 91786.0670 �91�7?86.0610 By: / AU.e'.f/ -4 t.'%r s1��/ By: _OAd. /}/�ir IU- • u>�Fi7tad g— e� ni —ied Alan& CAwporri Oy: 1z (-,. %r o- -cI Auirmorlaw •City Agent CITY OF RAtICHO CUCAMON0+1. a Municipal Corporation 9720 Bate Line Rod. Unit 'C' ATTEST: nehe Cutaeanga• Ca 9177 By: u '�I /t�y �art 032194 Bet. 052494 ^� `` / 7 RECORDING REWSTED By AND VUEA PECO2DED RETURN TO; City Clerk City Of RIPCho Cucas.onga P. 0. Boa 1107 Ranch CUCMn9a. CA 91770 FIRST SUPPLEM� [NTAt AGREEWNT TFPPA VISTA PARC DEYFCOPpFNT AGPffY.FNT RO 1 This First Supplemnal 49reeer,t (•Ag,remAt•) N entered Into as of day of I9 "S, by and between Lewis Constroction n7 <. r cprpon an, estrm portico, a general partnership, Lewis N Of California. • general aramMp. an r. . .__. a (hereinafter, •Na Or1 tnai par! A reeren. '.wr�a n9nrarns no. a Ot June 1984 and ado tad D the CI ) e /Itottra a ce tha 7th day Mich ordinance tookp effect July 76, 1984. t Levi andxtheCty 2,R slaettas hentafter referred t0 indfilMally ea a •Party and collectively as •the Parties.• RECITALS that Vista of aC reftdential developers, wand �Canseoinely t rues desire to establish both the allocation of restdanttal density with "SPICC thereto and the park develoco,at reavirtanta which shall apply into. B. The parties desire that this Agneant 4uppiew:eet the Original Part A9renent, but desire a ncenfin that. accept AS so SO leawnted. the Original Put Atneaent t and shall ream In lull Force and effect in accordance with its tens. to AS OF AGRFrour In consideration of the foragoln9 and the mtual covenants herein c"tained, Lewis and City agree as Follows: 1. Change of Deslaated Ur of School Prooertr The School (Ifstrict it t Present owner of the School Site, and has Mgt application to the Cfttl' for coshing of said Property to perelt naiCential use threat TAa City shall gro:af 990 apPllcatipn In accordance with tw, and shall ate a detemintion as to whether to pemit said use. At City& r"gest, Lewis hat ride application for approval of Terra Vista Caeranity Plan Aeendeent NO: t, caolstent therewith. 2. _D 9111na Unit Allocation the """cation Dy tha School District far resan[ai can of the School Site reauots aopronl 01 one hundnJ twenty (170; d•'a111M units. A$ a suit of so,- of thle appilutio . tai numou o1 Melting unlit n /lotted fn Section 7 of t Or1gIn1 part Agreeant (hall Dr 1a:n+te0 a eight Nauand At hndead twnty (8,170) at ol0•nnge denslry and nIV ,.,,and . me hundre d th1 CgIght (9.758) at w+clAal density, as a contequance Of t pc[ that t School Site not +nt7efDand to be v C. I :a 1 r Agreenent Page 2 developable for any purpose other than as a school site at the ttn the Parties entered into the Original Park Ag,vmnt. 1. Park foleaentatton Park exaction requirenentl for the n the Planned Conanity shall be Increa Rd, as a "Suit of the MIldentlal dexelopaint of the School Site, at the rata set forth.fn Section 1 of the Original Park Agreeaent. a. Conffn Ilan Except It spec7fl "1lY ift forth hereln, the Original Pirk Agreere I s MMDy confireard by the Parties as In full farce and effect, and this l9" nt $hall be subject to the unnandid p"rlllons thereof. IN WITNESS 1f.07IEOF the parties herato have executed this Agreeeent as Of the data first $eon vrltten. 'Levis- LEWIS COB:TRUCTIOX CO., INC. LEWIS DE5'ELOPREXT CO., a California corporation a general partnership 1156 M. nountiln Alamo 1156 X. Mountain Arm* Post Office Be. 670 Post Office 80. 670 Upland, CA 91785 Upland, CA MISS By: By; a n r ut an Au rte qen — By: is u i n «reuq WESTERN PRepErtlES, LEWIS MMES Of MIfORVA, a general partnership a general partnership 1136 X. Mountain Ate" li 6 X. Mountain bemn Post Office Sax 670 Past Office Bos 670 Upland, CA 9!785 Upland. CA 91783 By: By: 7G- Mrized Agent a rtt gent .Cf y. CICT OF RANCHO VXAMIROA, A Mmiclpal Corporation 9120 Base line Rod, Unit 'C' ATTESTi Rancho CUCA"s, CA 91710 By: row_ rr eL;E— [T-n— PJX:COL:du/917PAA 081186 t e 4ij •.y f r d e�P r si 1 klalk Me ORDINANCE 3c, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA COKIUHITY PLAN AMENDMENT 86-01, TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL SITE TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (4 -8 OU;AC) FCR 20 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE YF— SIDE OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, NORTH OF CHURCH STREET. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, dues ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby finds and determines the following- - A. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, foliming a public hearing held in the time and manner prescribed b: law, recomcends the Community Plan text amendment hereinafter described, and this City Council has held a public hearing in the time and manner prescribed by law and duly heard and considered said recommendation. P. That this Community Plan text amendment 1s consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. chat :his Community Plan text amendment is consistent with the original intent of the Terra Vista Community Plan. D. A Negative De•laratimn is hereby adop•ed for this amendment baseu upon the completion and °indings of the Initial Study. SECTION 2: The Community Plan text of the Terra Vista Ccmmunity Plan is hereby amen3ed as indicated in the attached 'Amendment No. 2 to the Terra Vista Commnity P:an.' /93 ' f — +reT 4 ordain ORDINANCE NO. 30ZI" All ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNC.L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO r.00ANONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING "FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO THE TERRA VISTA PARK DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 14 BETWEEN rift CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND LEWIS CONSTRUCTIO3 COMPANY. INC.. WESTERN PROPERTIES, LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA AND LEWIS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Cauucii of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does lows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and determines as follows: A. Government Code Sections 65864 throuen 66:39.5 authorize the City to enter info binding OeveTopttcnt Agreements wit persons having legal or equitable Interest in real property for the development of such property. B. Three copies of the proposed "Piro Supplemental Agreement to the Terra Vista Perk Development Agreenasnt No, between the City on the one hand and Lewis Construction Company, Inc., a California corporation, Western Properties, a General Partnership, Lewis Homes of California, a Gencral Partnership, end Lewis Development Company, a General Partnership, hereinafter collectively • lewis- on the otPer hand ale on file in the office of the City Clerk, ar,d the ssame are public records of the City. C. The proposed "First Supplemental Agreement to the Terra Vista Park Development Agreement No. 1" pertains to real property situated in the City known as the Terra Vista Planned Community. The planned community includes an area of land beginning at the intersection of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulevard; thence traversing north along the centerline of Haven Avenue to the south right of way of the Pacific Electric Railroad; thence east to the easterly boundary of the Dear Creak Flood Control Channel; thence southwesterly along said boundary to the centerline of Base Lina Road; thence east to the centerline of Rochester Avenue; thence south to the centerline of Foothill Boulevard; thence west to the beginning point, b -ing the intersection of Haven Avenue and Foothill oni-levard. N IM :t C ,s h„ t} it 1 D. The City Council has held a public hearing on the proposed "first Supplemental Agreement to the Terra Vista Park Devolopment Agreement Ito. 1" and notice of that public hearing has been given for the time and in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sectioa 65667. E. The provisions of the proposed "First Supplemental Agreement to the Terra Vista Park Devetopmont Agreement No. 1" are consistent w,th the City's General Plan and the Community Plan of the Terra Vista Planned Community. SECTION 2: The proposed "First Supplemental Agreement to the Terra Vista Par evetopment Agreement No. 1" between the City and Lewis, referred to to Section 1 above, is hereby approved. On the effective date of this Ordinance tl,e Mayor shall sign as many copies of said Development A3reement as are necessary for the parties; and City Clerk shall attest to the same and shall deliver one fully signed copy to Lewis. SECTION 3: The, Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause tame to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in Tho Datl Ae opt, a newspaper of general circulation publ'shed in the City of n ar o, a ornla, and circulated in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 1� I .a 0 YlY lilA1(IOIf '_ 3 3 CC J QQQi N Y w ~ d m a „ Y1r Y..I n 2V qO w yym O qq yy�I W Cd]r d«I _. d # N S d• � L o« —u # 7 6 N V W S Y O N > O q C «h r p a g o 'lo N C >o u m 9 o a L >•.� C .ii L p y'� d N LLq:: q N '0- C EN i0 01 rCC 0.4 ] m 5 ryd`� d«�q$Vg coo Al: IC Ldd>•d .des QE'NA $ h� huCC ii9 @9„L•f.•$oF CL �i L �' w c LNrdj�L�O!p U uN� � 66 GGG8t 6 6� 7> > « ^ V c3 4-00 o2 #0 $A_am guFE N«y� WY L u E$#tJ «0dS C % m r. C N x6 m u O N #> C � u d N N N "Eli E l i .' y `i O N$ ES Q # L « 8 Y NN d9k�)cR O dLdL09$ UV O�LN9 'a c N — $NpggaO1 Ee..�q �p9h]q> 'CS, Co uc— c d m o h c,n N d C�/� V'.3d w�'rjFdm� 9u 3a3� 3u��y��t#ms 0 TU 8' m U N a, 9L ]yq CC OI`+ ,�Y #m'C Cn]C•rJ U9 # N _ qc �o>E Ld�OCC >$dr.9Am cgqpEl7$3S E 44 g u of oNUd cE$.d.0 ac Nd9u i nw$o.$v0tl v ^•,L' "' 6 To p> Y.cL L cpL , °�S • • u3 U um•rn$ Uu�om o m« dL «oI h$3�' #mmm- al /9 y91H 'J(% � �1� l70 a1C+iS ~ `3 E cc EO y % I W N 11 __. -. 3 � SCI I � 3 I. it Qi a 3 �F N ICL ' III � , rt � a / • j L I. �:` a' • a 0 _ED Till �,�� ti E d Q51�1r Ij V O� �I i I 3 3 9 3I W I I 1 6/ II �I i 1 W ° t I �-- I S2 _m s I Q. 1 D d C � Et _N" L' >.D 1 0 1 d I N >. INN 1 fT d C N U 1 da 4.t SL -�$ LDRd•G -M IE NyYU LL.. .°-C�� JIIRO 0> .0 ~NN NDLOE>.ggN • -j>.q V- D —N 9 D L G L« l d D G C O� N$ U '> °Uf N N A• O Y a d R N U U L C 0021& LpN�uG dam+ ECL o� ] U ld• E ?L N 9 3« ri m o �+ _ EE d$" R U d E ;Lduu °U o� .icL °qY��F -,.q.m o «-aii� CIO Rah$°. «C$L''L UC —�'G _U$wd V��Ud.1C CUd NLLq U5 C,I 0 v N] On N•Lp- L. QINOO NR V —C�aN % 1% •E C L E V a q 41 00 N A 7 S ��ppp��L�Lp!!!''��111 A« G w U c a R O (J. L N« g O Y A ] U CD ` V C >•D C A g l V w t N R V O Q °> O .. a ~p L L d°« Ng R L C N O L NV N ° D ]� UA]+R � C G ], ~ aO E«c°E X 0=iu O g., gN gq � 4 mG qL .x YL OI L d d�l� C N R ° c a�Q O Lp 6 N „u _ " $ ;R ,O uELUEn � r $ N ; � A N ° I aN 1 N ] V p Lx _o "E —2.gR « r° U R A4a LaanR d NCD N OD `O�ou Ern �j «ppC 7 u S I Owq rOw:1?" U u o c C ] 0 d> C d N LU O d O N L L C d E U So outy V «-N o' RR 0m cx d L d d r N l C C r C C q` >.0 y d U d d 0 C ]R «C ul N O• - 1� 0 �Y 3$C V-- .O� y01 �aR 4N WN] •Om975 C C =LL m 1�•w E« .., m �1 -7F« •t� CLNF_E3RW ,1- q� D — «n 3N V« M] F ° r p'O8v d d'h 4O HIM =59.3, o «4R .Lq'U gmOO cN LOLO «'plb :6«°«� .c�6 L.d. E dCUy UC� j d >$ VI .0 q O1�« q D �t �E1 V— S l,. N L$ 4 L p C D N fV MM M wD $8 ' LR C gN «N'.'y g oU9Nraa qUU Uwe. QI Z OR OO mC10 LLsiloD CQ°N 0L WOE LZm NRdgC N— LL L 9 wSL W r o n C OI] V '3 Oq d u^a „"]. L $m R co cdo E$c NU3 D .2 y •�D dNro s���� = dfDu�3�uQU�g ] 5 L d— $.+CNN NE R$G_: OI GG � "G U r. N'Bp a R �q d R$mD q R d U O Er d R N FF O p O C �c q DAu 4 ]vaG ° � S; L O L d E � U I WW °rCc �08 v mc�N n < L. X. D d 04 1; U 0-0 WIC C Uy D 4] o �; D-> «�N = � Q� �NcE �D �V 2Ra 1, N N - N o 1 sOL�� ud r-Crn rte. o. c �1- c dm 2 Yin N _ C u � E p'„ �3 v e o E tic 1: w 0 V A C j si � [Il m qm,p cME Ed a0 N `s 0 m _ N ' �a ��`'N N K dcm mU. ° `m L °dL = I�� cCL° aL C;O dC01�"OI -09X o-> �Y vN�O �� 9i 2 B��N _c $�°p mac" ddd 5N as q> 'a90=0 `d'`a 5> U a m 7 > m 6 C� 0 C m N> C YYJ111 m_ $..— C � _9 c� «d NC 10M wco 5Z.�Ho c d `J. —`N d l ` — l 01 O. N J 0 3 L Q O Y, .d,„ O m Nil _N m V9� 0 W d OC Nd 'O is —= mN� a 3 9�d C U C: LaOmF ArLO RN° dtiq d,mU— gLpC C -0 C, Q m7 '€1NN C 96 d'p- >.Sf C >E,NN 7yg1C C =d� N9E 6 �IL� r W q d L C l @Eg�� QN «C .3 -0 Q�d Qg0VdiY W qO f ° o [Urn -udi ydj wl 41 7 S • • • • • 0 N Y m � rn:i V E 0 � 4 n r 1 � 9 O E V NPMW n , ` uyia nM.- m 1A 0 E N MNr.� 1- o 0. r a -vJ E ° i e p EO nnnm bory ti i 20Z`. V• rn� <U 3 07 bP�N 'S I 1� ' N 0c; LUQ Ir�Ivv -NMp O N b IIIIII111IIINNNNNNN...... 4 q A III��Yttt""`VVVIII b � j } u u a a mm m u 2 U 9 qu Uu�x 5 bO.Jj� N u m�OU co c 0 a ag u d 1' Lein+c uC�UV Via= 1 W O m c v�G�o� x Q QD -8ag Y in ,j ���o LN� < po u Br If n F.'Gx C� U V10 O NNNq �CJC1S x WuEEO« N -n_tgo lA L7 F+ mur bwva !3 0 N 6S,-V;{ D O Q n c ;roaruO1� ou.C. vx xxln <oucn3 °� ire y z �i2 U UUZOa' i o, ,n's V)LL O aNV es3~ ci 0° °� N O r ° =oD� d� A q1 _N �.� AU.N Gam• ��LNN LOCyJ` l.N C� V uro L V VF" OI�ED� u°iUq— 'U ;v°�Eam��°v'v`oE .Ca Inc gouo °..wc m g ;NL- 5o°C° —o 3 U C 3 O y «N 3Y'O l -rCj A c cv "v «�.. �q�mEoi� X30 (f N�ppC N }C� °•+Y 01>. LppLNr 0...� � d N °O Ec�En06�p.9 cU1cm0 N ° N o> L; d U« L H�aiE�rao,`�5 uk5v> a � a 5 E- r` t L L a N LC 37 fS ,. C v «o =u��c•- R CLYua "c9 ;c10 F°-5 5.2 E + j m N C N ,=12 , �q$ C N OyUG=«�N ova « $ c r 2 m 9 gig N L C U u =rn_ —� °��a,,cCoaail$� F6 'Mac bEa:Vu Alp/9 'CI` 04 ova le aoa- 0 z u W U }Zn 0: r a } z W O W 0 J H W a s O w = O w 5 z F Z W z W Y a C O A 0 a i F u OI mac OCi znQ L O. V N o ct Y N ax° a 3 ~•u ° gA x = E �C« MCI-- OI 2.H «ry CV 10-`oa NM nQ m nMMn�. nM o nmolm �,° Mm n ry N M� m iOiQOQ N�� O Om OOmm NO. � Mn MMnM N.. N .• O '1 MMgNN NM Q 04QNnN YIN M NMNNN� �� ry N OI O O N� f N n N N K a NMip TOi V a� o LLLLJ u LL. LL . V1NINVli 0 •• tlO00m0 N1OQ1 I __ « ry N OI O O N� f N n N N K a q N n N A Lt OI ` —U qLL Y1 O N u U r NNY V OI `^N? C 7OIW v CsSC q «ry,`, u N� U< O U A —yam A R C N Q < OA a.O,q N ca. LL r 'nBL A VVI N..� p a N O p O L D L U5 H°` — Q9--5 < a D w c N!2 .c $ ° 9 C yp m u�•. ,A.� c•o U O. rn g.o L 01-5 N C N u—pI«..r -7« C« n h; C U r N Y G L fV ^�3: 9a Yo V.9 ; Ly« C N—a p M A...CC Y„ �� �00 o p-G eaaLa « uLL N Y C Y N m N N g T w 7 ° OIU m o C a �d pip 3•$Am D CCU) C �C'30uC ..DyO �0..7 yEN� �°$u u n°. u L 'p N d O M �• M T S (. y� °LOpII N d Y O 0,- O QO' Uy, Cq1 9ryU L A a Y N Jlar Uq 00 N C 0 2 tELA 0 9L ao �...>. LW a I° a CI c:VI CLB CCN °v1N iE} C •d `C .2O J i OCC C O yz co D'N a '� � CE CA'S -A ye ° 0 2 C E a W Vl w lY M Lr J V 0 •• N1OQ1 I b n el q N n N A Lt OI ` —U qLL Y1 O N u U r NNY V OI `^N? C 7OIW v CsSC q «ry,`, u N� U< O U A —yam A R C N Q < OA a.O,q N ca. LL r 'nBL A VVI N..� p a N O p O L D L U5 H°` — Q9--5 < a D w c N!2 .c $ ° 9 C yp m u�•. ,A.� c•o U O. rn g.o L 01-5 N C N u—pI«..r -7« C« n h; C U r N Y G L fV ^�3: 9a Yo V.9 ; Ly« C N—a p M A...CC Y„ �� �00 o p-G eaaLa « uLL N Y C Y N m N N g T w 7 ° OIU m o C a �d pip 3•$Am D CCU) C �C'30uC ..DyO �0..7 yEN� �°$u u n°. u L 'p N d O M �• M T S (. y� °LOpII N d Y O 0,- O QO' Uy, Cq1 9ryU L A a Y N Jlar Uq 00 N C 0 2 tELA 0 9L ao �...>. LW a I° a CI c:VI CLB CCN °v1N iE} C •d `C .2O J i OCC C O yz co D'N a '� � CE CA'S -A ye ° 0 2 C E a W Vl w lY M Lr J t ICe ii C O 7 J3 _N r c O O r r 'N C U 00 ?C COOT — A d N T) >Y e L• o d m u D a ca E �0 0 0 L C r YiclY e c d a 0 1 O d 0 «g ; - - - O u x -.0 R 0 , u u o u cL «.�.�C u pioN C 3LDCd9�n,�!~ uv1 �1 9 Y Y D C a�i m r D g L U w O Y L N _'t) O C d5nL9 «LUD L'—>' u O si u C1 0 ? n > C C < «gc 0 a'a C O9 O_N Y L�dou 'c CO C C i M u N= g Y gt 0 7 C o rZ2M'CE:4"UI-SLEv L L. mta I pX I I O Y N c V lC u'C4u «OL CL xnx` C C N 1`y O Y g f.1 U P E q a Y L LE L L Y 0« N Y ry o N~ R 9 l 8+ u o o �' Y o E= w C .nj Y« Mc U 6� �«>.C—J3 NN'�aNrE cW w7 CN'OU jUd «a:%&a.C� nom, r.ya «out C L C L Up«NU�go 7«v cw 7t--= E`o m 0� 9 9 1 1 r.. —�mYC gEC7 Ilru C 2C.� m N cp Y— N �a ttY H« �q N E d `\. «c c V A 4� N Y9 d=EY JCD c9`O CX g n> C q` O N 5- EE d vEE'$EMC °g3dv 0 9'X-4- >'—_N cc CIO Y L L E NOt a N Y«E�m #cy Y qq 0 ccccLL n 2 d g N C Y O N L Y N NL oC�U ~cY�oJc nL >E9 p.. 7'^IN.oec NOOiNO UOIU.Y.� qC O «7Ar E(ihdoa9 C)� 5 0 S O v a )rM9 _Y - >n d >0u qL q a a L 0 «d..0 F a c c� U A D 1« ` > 00,>A« M q L M qCL�` 3L t Q E 'c r) G 0 N d L N t °m6 —D tMm= o 1- c —Crn� a�0cd 0 E o ou aL"utS A c A F 4� R N L rU eL C 4o Y vE Al Mt- 0 rn� C 0 L o a rn d N 0 F N 0 Z N C C 1 W K A �-1 X CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Dctobe• 15, 1986 tsn TO: Mayor and Member of the City Council FROM: Otto Kroucil, Senior Planner SUBJEC PROGRAMMING OF 563,000 IN ADDITIONAL 1936 -87 COW FUNDS AND AEPAOGRI I, D�ATI recommended dprog^aesing $63,000ctn aECa utlon author of aaditional 1986 -87 funds and reprogramaing of $44,000 of previously unexpended I 198243 funds for three projects, and direct staff to transmit to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. II. BACKGROUND: In July, 1986, after the process of programainy Co=n,ty dpmen Block Grant (CDBG) funds for 1986 -87 had been cmpleted, the City was inform d by the Department of Housing and Urban Development Fe (HUD) that its grant for 1986 -87 tvuld be $69,000 greater than originally indicated. On August 20, 1986, City Council approoed allocation of $6,900 of this money to the Senior Shared (lousing Prcgra.n operated by Inland Mediation Board. The rescaining $63,000 has yet to be programmed. In add:ticn, $44,000 from the 1982 -83 'WG program year are available for reprograaning to new projects. ital of 107,000 is available. Staff has identified three projects which neat federal eligibility guidelines and could be funded with these new and reprogrammed munles. 1. North Town Streets Phase Iv: This project (which is underway at s t may s resurfacing streets and installing curbs, gutters, and sidewalks on Acacia, Belmont, Cottage, and 8th Streets i,, the North Tcwe neighborhood. Engineering Division Indicates that, dire to unexpected soils problem%, cotspletion has been delayed and the cast is expected to exceed original estimates. The total cost is expected to be $ ,0,000. The City has previously programmed $173,000 to the project. Amount Requests $17,000 F' +� 2. Housinq Rehabilitation Loans /Grants: This year, the city council a oca ed— SW,000 —toffee used to make low '.. interest hone repair loans and enargency repair grants to seniors and other eligible low and moderate inceme F„ homeowner! in the City of ilincho Cucamonga, However, ' /J I r (i t ' CITT COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ADDITIONAL 86 -87 CDBG FUNDS October 15, lv<:s Page 2 last year this program spent $124,372, and it is expected to do as well again this year. Housing rehabilitation assistance t0 low and moderate income homeowners is the main focus of the federal CDOG program. In order to aioid interruption of service, staff recommends inc ^casing the allocation for this project from $80,000 co $.:0,000. Amount Requested V40,OD0 3. Street Improvements an the South Side of Feron program of provemen z for the North Tam neighborhood. Preliminary estiamates from the Engineering Department indicate that the cost will be approximately $50,000. The North Town neighborhood is a predominantly low and moderate income area so the proposed improvi2ents are eligible for CDBG funding. This is a new project. Amount Requested $50,000 ;'trJ& projects' recriested total. $107,000, is an amount equal to fe Bilo/ocL Grant funds. y subq(ttted, Otto Sent Attachment: Resolution of Approval 1 .)D( r a V ` fu elf k ilkA RESOLUTION NO. 84 K" A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPROGRAMMING FUNDS FROM THE 1982- 83 COMMUNITY DEYELOPWIT BLOCK GRANT AND PROGRAMMING ADDITIONAL 1956 -07 COMMUNITY Ot'VELOPHENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS WHEREAS, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development informed the City of Rancho Cucamonga that it would receive an additional $69,000 in 1986.87 Community Developmit Block Grant; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously programed 16,000 of the additional funds, leaving 163,000 to be allocated to eligible project*: and WHEREAS, tho City Council allocated 187,000 in 1982 -83 Community Oovelopmenr, Block Grant furds to Housing Rehabilitation Loans and Grants, but ' I.. this first program year spent only 119,600; and WHEREAS, 167,400 from the 1282 -83 program year are available for reprogramming to another project; and WHEREAS, the three projects proposed for funding meet the eligibility reil0rements set by federal regulations for the Community Development Block Grant; and d WHE.'IEAS, an environmental review has been completed for each project in compliance with federal regulations and no adverse pacts have been ' identified; and e WHEREAS, a duly - noticed public hearing has been held to receive public input on the proposals. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that: Thu City of Rancho Cucamonga doos hereby program $63,000 in additional 1986 -87 funds and reprogram 144,000 in 198. AJ Surds originally allocated to Housing Rehabilitation and for the followial projects: J. North Town Streets - Phase IV 117,000 2. North Town Streets - Feron Blvd, Improvements 150,000 3. Housing Rehabilitation Loans and Grants 140,000 TOTAL 1107,000 +' tl I .l 6�•1 • /l I 1IX ^' � \ Y 1 xx • t ' YY� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT a ^ATE: October 15. 1986 1 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rubin Yu, Associate Planner COBJECT: REPROGRAMMING OF MSG FUNDS SET ASIDE FOR NORTH TOWN PARR 5LIE ACQUISITION TO OL U30 FOR 9DffTff—TL79ff--'PW DEVELOMMT I. ABSTRACT: In the iga4 -85 Community Development Block Grant program, $150,000 was set aside for acquisition of a park site in the North Town neighborhood. Since the site will be acquired through other .means, these funds can be reprogrammed for another project. A publ'. hearing is required for all reprograming actions. Staff recomends reprogramming to the fund for development of the North Tam Park. II. BACKGROUND: In 1984 -85, $150,000 was allocated from Community ev II elopmW-E hark Grant funds for acquisition of a park site in North To.m. in :9115 -06, an additional $150,000 was allocated from CDBG funs* lir park development. Staff has reached an agreement with the picanrtj Omer to acquire a five -acre park site in exchange for driinage improvem_nts and other considerations. (Approval of t',.e agreements is a separate itm& -on the agenda.) As a result, the funds set aside for site acquisition can bs used for development of the park facility. II1. PUBLIC REVIEW: Federal regulations require - duly noticed public hear ng or aTT raprograt:ing decisions. Nrtice was published on August 8, 086. No written comments have been received. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the reprogramming of n 1984 -8S CDBG funds from park aurytsition to park development for the Worth Town Neighborhood Park oe approved. ReS200ful ly s fitted, Bra Buller City Planner BB:RY:dak ,r4 a w AV REBCY,OTION 110, 86 -272 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGVNONGA. CALIFORNIA rt REPROGRAMMING FUNDS FROM THE 1986 -83 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FROM NORTH T" PARR NITS ACQUISITION TO BE USED FOR NORTH TOWN PARK DEVtLOPL%4T WHEREAS. the City of Rancho Cucamonga operates a Community Development Block Grant Program in compliance with th- regulations established by the O.N. Department of Dousing and Urban Development; and WHEICAS, the City Council allocated $150.000 from the Fiscal Year 1996 -85 Community Development Block Grant for acquisition of a vita for a neighborhood park in the Borth Town neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the City !au acquired the site through other manor, and WDEREAS. the City Council has held a Poly mnticed public hearing to receive public iuprt on the use of these f�-,dm. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the $150,000 allocated for park site acquisition in the Borth Two neighborhood is reprogrammed to park vita development and staff is directed to transmit information an this program change to the O.D. Department of Housing and Urbr.a Development. P.18E91). APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of , 1936. C 1 , ri �O 9 A , 9 I it C CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.�SONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 15. 1986 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FRI* Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Lisa Nininger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENYIR"WAL ASSESSMENT AND DEYELOPMT DISTRICT .... -. - w„ w nM M I.WMRn11M - A request to amna the Development s r c p ram L' (2 -4 du /ac) to I.M. ' (4-8 du /ac) for 13.55 acres of land locc,ed on the south side of Feron, east of Archibald - APN 209 - 055 -02, 03, 14. I. BACKGROUND: Staff has initiated a Development District Amendmnt ('or a-- F located on the south side of Feron Avenue, east of Archibald. This request is one of the approvals required for the North Town park land donation process. General Plan Amendment 06-01A for this site was approved on April 2, 1986, changing the General Plen designation frog no" Density Residential (2 -4 du /ac) to' Low Medium Density Residential (4 -8 du /ac). State law requires that the Development District designations be consistent with the General Plan land use designations. Although a General Plan amendment has been granted, the site cannot receive further approvals until the process ties been completed and the Development District Map has been amended. The issues r61ch were discussed regarding the General Plan AmtndMA are described fully in the attached staff repo °t. However, through the General Plan Amendment hraring process, all land use issues nave been resolved and no significant issues exist reWr6ing the Duelopment District Amendment. An Initial StudY was prepared in accordance with the environmental analysis fr- 9A 86 -01A. No significant environmental impacts have been identiived. ,boy 4 ■ r r a._ ' CITT COUNCIL STAFF 1r 1RT Development District wwndnent 86-02 Page 2 II. PLANNING COMMISSION A4COM1ENDATION: The Planning Commission rec= s approva o ope n istrict Mendatnt 86-02 and issuanc¢ of a Negative Declaration. Should the City Council concur, approval of the attached Ordinance would be required. Respectfully submitted, Braer • City Planner Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Vicinity Nap April 2, 1986 Staff Report Ordinance �r H E YN...3'✓ f„ :tom =�,i MEDIUM :J5,CH0QL SITE . -itil. I lk 1 1 ....: . . . . . ..... r LAW ...... ..... .. • . . .. ......... . •••••. ........ ...... . . .. .......... . • . ....... .......... ....... .... ..... ........... --- aGENERA.L. lN0.U..$T..RlXIl: NORM CITY OF h. RANCHO CUCAMONGA TrrLE. 1111_'Inlk�j XAV PLANNING DfVtMq Mmrr. SCALE,-' DRAFT oLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - AUGUST 13. 1986 - FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES UKT Chairman Stout advised tnat the following items were related and would be heard concurrently by the Commission. L. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 86-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A rcques seen a eve oprxn s r c Low Medium (4 -8 du /ac) for 13.5 acres of land, to aced an the South cside of Feron, east of Archibald Avenue - AIM 209- 085 -02. 03, 14. U. NORTH TOWN PARK DENSITY BONUS AGREEMENT Lisa Nininger, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report for the Development District Amendment. 6111 Holley, Community Services Director presented the North Town Park Density Bonus Agreement report. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. There ware no public comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Barker stated this piece of property has been before the Commission many times with requests in increase the density. He recalled statements from the Community when asked if they realized 8 dwelling units to the acre could be ten with a density bonus, they had stated that they would have to see what the product looked like. He was concerned that there is no product associated with this request; therefore, no guarantee. Even though the City would get a 5 acre park site, he was concerned with the control the City would have over the product type. He felt it was the Commission's determination as to whether the procedures and safeguards which would be used on any other parcel or product which comes before the Commission would still be applied. He was concerned that the density bonus which allows 10 dwelling units to the acre still give the City the room to work and make sure that the product and the standards can be enforced. As far as the density bonus agreement, he stated the only thing the Commission could do 1s to make a recommendation to the City Council. He stated that even though It killed him, he was inclined to buy the 20 units over the maximum in exchange for 5 acres of park as long as he was assured somehow that the standards could be enforced to insure a good product. Chairman Stout stated that he had voted against the deislty increase every time it had come before the Commission. He advised that an Environmental Impact R Mat been prepared for the site, Mich 1s remarkable given the size of 1. The Environmental Impact Report indicated that no more thin 4 tov .units should be constructed. He indicated that this proposal averaged omlVt& 14 acres is actually reducing the density to approximately 6 1/2 units pr'scre. He stated this would decrease the amount of people and the service demand. Mich was one item the Euvironeental Impact Report indicated as critical due to the size of the streets. Further, that the drainage problem Mich has been a problem to the residents for a loeg time would be corracUd, and A park would be provided, Mich 1s a much needed item for the residents In the area. He pointed out that the density is very similar to Mat was approved on 19th and Archibald, Mich pr.,ved that an attractive project could be built at this density. He additionally stated that this project would still be subject to Design Review, and that the C rp Coaalttee would insist on the sane design standards in this loCatIC as any other s1 a in the City. Ht was not quite as reluctant to recommend approval as 6omissioner Barker in that he felt this -as a win -wil situation for the City; it that it was good for the area and good for the City. Commissioner Chitiea stated that the Comsaission was told that th; community is in agreement, but the Planning Commission was not informed of any of the meetinggs which took place and felt it was unfortunate that no one from the mm counity was present to represent their feelings on the issue. She was uncomfortable with zcceptirg a project for which there are no design parameters and not knowing how the sits plan would work or what the product type would look like; thsrei'ore, had reservations about proposal but would support it because she felt it would be beneficial to that part of the communl ty. Commissioner McNiel stated that the City would still have leverage when the project comes back before Design Review; therefore, was not concerned with not seeing the product at this time. He pointed out that typically people come to the Planning Commission meetings are angry with a project; apparently, they attended the previous meetings ;end were sctlsfiea with the proposal otherwise they would be here. Commissioner Rempel stated he had a great many reservations. The fact that there 1s no coewunity representation this evening, as no real indication that they were happy with the proposal, :psi that they Ira beginning to give up. :ie felt the park should be 1nteg -ated with the project; simply cutting off a portion of the part:l and eking it a park with the remainder fatly high density housing it that arei of City could have sae serious problems. He thougat a more creative use.of the property could have been accomplished. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by WNW, to recommend approval of Envirotmental Assessment and Development District Amendment 86.02 to V's Cit- Council. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS BARKER, MCNIEL, CHITIEA, STOUT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: REVEL - carried /3 T•+� ' ?. RESOLUTION N0. 86 -123 A RESOLUTION OF 'TIE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COM4ISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENOMENT NO. 86-02 REOULCTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION FROM LOW TO LOW- MEDIUM FOR 13.55 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FERON, EAST OF ARCHIBALD - APUI 209 -055- 02, 03, 14. ' IHEREAS, on the 15th day of July, 1986 an application was filed and accepted an the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 13th day of August, 1986, the Planning Commission held a July advtctlsed public hearing pursuant to Section 65554 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following n— fi- aings? , 1. That the subject property 1s suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use In the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed district change would not have slgnlficsnt impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. Tnat the proposed district change is in conformance with the General Plan. SEC -1Ca 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this pro ec w not create :,significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Ne9ative Declaration on August 13, 1986. NON. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1- That pursuant to Sectfon 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 13th day of August, 1986, Development District Amendment No. 86-02, 2. The P16nning Commission hereby recommends that the ' City Coimcr'1 approve and adopt Development District Amendmvm;it No. 86-02. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. r r APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13th DAY OF AUGUST, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ltenn s u , a roan' Ft ATTEST: Brad Buller, deputy Secre ar— y I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of thi City of Rancho Cucmwge, d, hereby certify that the-foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, ,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucemunga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of August,1^1986, by'tM following vote -to -wits ' + AYES: COMMISSi011EFS:t' BARKER, XCNIEL, CHITIEA,'STOUi NOES: COMMISSIONERS: R@UPEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE r, r 1 t , f A"A , ri!!S 134 S,_'•. n 'F -1 _� J I �(R`�'•:.y: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 13, 1986 TO: Chairnsn and Meebers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City planner BY: Lisa Nininger, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT 86-02 - eve oilmen s r c s p ram 'L' (2-4 du /ac) to 'LM' (4- 8 du /ac) for 13.55 acres of land located on the mouth side of Feron, east of Archibald - APN 209- 055 -02, 03, 14, BACKGROUND: Staff has initiated a Development 0istrict Amendment To-r--a--s-TfF located an the south side of Feron Avenue, east of Archibald. This request is one of the approvals required for the North Town park land donation process. General Plan Amendment G6-OIA for this site was approved on April 2, 1986, changing the General Plan designation from Low Density ReA dential (2 -4 du /ac) to Low Nediue Density Residential (4-8 du /ac). State lav requires that the Development District designations to consistent with the General Plan land use designations. Although a General Plan amendment has been granted, the site cannot receive further approvals until the process has been completed and the Development District Map has been amended. The issues which were discussed regarding the General Plan Arwrdment arr, described fully in the attached staff report. However, through the General Plan Madment hearing process, all land use ".%sues have been resolved and no significant issues exist I "-ding the Development District Amendment. An Initial Study was prepared in accordance with the environmental analysis for GPA 86 -01A. No significant environmental impacts have been identified. The. other item which wi:: be discussed in relation to this site is a density bonus agreement. This item will be presented as Director's Reports on this agenda. 0/� Pl.ANNING`COMISSION,S/'--F REPORT' Oevelepaent District A.andtent 86 -02 '• August 13, 1986 Page 2 i- • II. BECOMENOATION• Based on the approval of General Plan Amendment U6=0DC s�aR— recaeam,nNS approval of the subsequent Development District Aaendment 86-02 and issuance of a Fegative Declaration. Should the Planning Commission concur, approval of the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council would be required. , Respectfully suMitted, Drnd Buller ;ity Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A' - Vicinity Nap Resolution of Approval a/ % r ORDIDANCE 90. 299 M ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIPORSIA, RIZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 209 -055 -02, 03, 14 LOCAIED SOUTH SIDE OF PERQt, EAST OF ARCHIEALD FROM "L" (2-4 DU /AG) TO "LM" (4 -8 DO /AC) The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain of follows SECTION 11 The City Council hereby finds and determines the following: 6 A. That the Planning Conmissioo of the City of Rancbo 11 Cucamonga, following a public bearing hold in the time and manner prescribed by law, recommends the running of the property hnrainafter described, and this City Council ban held a public hearing in the time and moaner prescribed by law and Auly beard and considered t maid recommendation. N That this running to consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. This rescuing will have no significant eaviroumental impact as provided in the Negative Declaration filed herein. SECTIOR 2, The following Jascribed real property is hereby resound in the manner sEated, and the toning map Is hereby amended accordingly. An Amendment to the Development District Map from "Lv (24 du /ac) to "LM" (4 -E du /ac) for 13.5 acres of land, located no the south side of Peroa. east of Archibald Avenue - APB 209 -055 -02, 03, 14. SECrld 31 The Mayor shall s10m this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the came to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Wtv R "m"rt, s newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 19a. •" ,l 0 s = C DATE: TO, FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY OF RANCI10 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 15, 1986 Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Alan Warren, Assistant Planner In uc,cwr IMI nuncrncn, - aunw�un runuc - mLnumn, nu, a i rxn e yeaFs &0 to forty years for a Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Philip D. Schlosser, Elaine M. Schlosser, Albert Nolquln, Jr , Roberta J. Molquin, Jeffrey P Schlosser, Jacquelin L Schlosser, David 11. Richardson and Gene M. Richardson, regarding the future development and current operations of the industrial facility on 27.7 acres at the southwest corner of Array Route and Rochester Avenue - APN: 229 - 111 -05, 17 and 18. I RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission at its meeting of c o er , recemm"ded approval of AmenBmer. No. I to the Schlosser Forge Development Agreement. II DISCUSSION: When the City Council approved the Development gre7[— raaenf with the Schlosser Forge owners, Staff was directea to initiate an Amendment to extend the te.m of the Agreement from 25 to 40 years. Staff has drafted such an Amendment which eas reviewed at a Planning Commission Public Hearing on October 8, 1986. The Planning Com-aission rccommends approval of the extension. The vote was 4 -1. Analysis of the Time Extension is included with thn attached Planning Commission report. Res tf��������n��n,,u����l///ly������///��-� broi tied, �� 8 Her City Planner BB:AW:dak Attachments: Plannirg Commission Report of October 8, 1986 Correspondence Ordinance isn x$* :v z7. L CITY OF RANCH ` CUCAMONGA STAFF R1&;)'0RT DATE: October B. 1986 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner C 1977 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - SCHLOSSER FORGE - AMENDMENT NO. 1 An Amendment extending the term from twenty-five years to forty years for a Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Philip 0. Schlosser, Elaine M. Schlosser, Albert Holquin, Jr., Roberta J. Holquin, Jeffrey P. Schlosser, Jacquelin L. Schlosser, David M. Richardson and Gene M. Richardson, regarding the future development ani current operations of the industrial facility on 27 7 acres at the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue - APN 229 - 111 -05, 17 and 18. I BACKGROUND: On August 20, 1986, the City Council approved the 1st reea na ig for the Schlosser Forge development Agreement. At the Ccinrll hearing, one major item of discussion was the term of the Agreement. The City Council believed it would be appropriate to consider a 40 -year agreement lather than the :cconn:ended 25 -year term. Rather than delaying the Agreement, the Ccuncil decided to approve the Areement as drafted, but requested the Planning Commission to cons liar an Amendment extending the term of the Agreement to 40 years. The Nmendment has been revieweJ by the property owners and they are in favor of its implementation. II ANALYSIS: The nature of the Agreement does not change, except as Tway -6e affected by the term of • • Agreement. The City Council indieateJ that a term extension miyat be appropriate due to the long priod of time necessary to amortize tie specialized heavy equipment of the Forge facility. Staff can only speculate on the consequences of extel,d!ng the Agreement an additional 15 years. As time passes, the poiicies and development standards of the City can go through substantial changes, with the degree of change amplified over longer periods of time. The longer the period, the greater the potential for significant differences between present and furure developme ^t standards. ,A ITEM B III ? ■ .n ,r r r PLANNING COK41SSION STAFF REPORT SCHLCSSER FORGE - ANENDNENT NO. 1 October 8, 1986 Page 2 III. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission analy:eeffects, if any, the Amendment would have on their original evaluation of the Agreement. If the Planning Commission believes that the extensinn of term would not have any substantial effect on the purposes of the Agreement, it would be appropriate to recommend approval of the Amendment to the City Council. Res 'fully s tteo, Brad Bul er City Planner BB:AH:ko Attachments: Amendment No. 1 to the Schlosser Development Agreement Edward Hobson Letter of September 11, 1986 Ordinance r� �4e I , it t •,f' T a, C COVINOTON 6 CNOWC ev owr[ — P.E,..IVED- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P:ANNINO DIVISxkI SEP 12 1986 AN 71810, u 11:11<I1 I,:I:s 1'115P6 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Da pt. Planning Division P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Otto xroutil, Sentor Planner Re: Amendment No. 1 to Schlosser Forge Development Agreement Dear Otto: Schlosser Forge is in favor of Amendment No. 1 to extend the life of `he Agreement from its current term to 40 years. Please confirm that the recommendation of the Amendment has been placed on the Planning Commission Agenda for October 8, and ve will ensure that someone from our office will be there. EAR /js cc: Mr. Phil Schlosser Ms Chris Dempsey i:- Mr. John U. Gall If, x• a�-�a Respectfully, CEdOVI, NGO d CROWE rTo P : ArrOXINerN AT uA. vwn o cwYOloY u.O�A A own ual WEST SIXTH srw[er vu cro.[ AOV OLIe[ sow .e.0 ONTARIO. CAI. IORN:A 01104 N[fM [ pO W.,f11M COH..DO HI1YM }p[[M I K n0NI1[0. OY YInOM [YI..1 :an.fYA.x[ September 11, 1 ?86 nn[ Y ,..ouwn wax.+ nu mx Ivu Y mv.d .uc. • n[uu ofwo . a.•un tofu.. ,.vn Yf .nf nsu ev owr[ — P.E,..IVED- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P:ANNINO DIVISxkI SEP 12 1986 AN 71810, u 11:11<I1 I,:I:s 1'115P6 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Da pt. Planning Division P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Otto xroutil, Sentor Planner Re: Amendment No. 1 to Schlosser Forge Development Agreement Dear Otto: Schlosser Forge is in favor of Amendment No. 1 to extend the life of `he Agreement from its current term to 40 years. Please confirm that the recommendation of the Amendment has been placed on the Planning Commission Agenda for October 8, and ve will ensure that someone from our office will be there. EAR /js cc: Mr. Phil Schlosser Ms Chris Dempsey i:- Mr. John U. Gall If, x• a�-�a Respectfully, CEdOVI, NGO d CROWE rTo P : ■i AD CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA S r � ' }0 O M4 +km'' xIC{ 1• Q j .1/d,�Y� V ch de, J. RV." n Jm D. Mad, IS77 Rkhud K Ddd PunA{ J. WA& September 4, 1986 Tad Hopson Covington b Crowe 1131 Nest Sixth Street P.O. Box 1515 Ontario, California 91762 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SCHLOSSER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Dear Ted: Enclosed for your review and comment is a Draft Amendment to the Schlosser Development Agreement. As you will recall, City Staff was directed to initiate this Amendment by the City Council. The original 25 year Agreement received 2nd reading last night. Thn proposed Amendment would simply extend the life of the Agreement to 40 years. It is our intention to place the Amendment on the October 8, 1986, Planning Commission Agenda. I would appreciate receiving your comments 0r erns by September 15 1986. If you have any questions please el fr a to t t me or Jim Markman. /Sincere y. fr EL NT DEPARTMENT 7 Se or Plannbr X dak cc: Jim Markman enclosure IO BASE ROAD, SURE C. POST OFFICE SOX W? • RANCHO COCAY,ONOA, CALIFORNU 91770 . split 9791111. L y MEMORANDUM TO: Brad Buller, City Planner„ City of F<ancho Cucamonga FROM: James L. Markman, City Attorney It DATED: Auguut 26, 1986 RE: Amendment No. 1 to Schlosser Development Agreement Attached in reference to the above matter please find the following ducumentsa 1. A form of Amendment No. 1 to Development Agree- ment which simply extends the term of the agreement from twenty -five years to forty years; and 2. A form of ordinance 'or ultimate Council con- sideration. r As you will recall, we were directed to process ' this amendment at the last Council meeting at the same time that the Council continues to process the original davelop- went agreement. I suggest that you supply a copy of the proposed amendment to Ted Hopson for his review. The amand- ' ment is rather simple so I cannot see him wishing to modify + it Then, the amendment must be processed as a zone change identical to the processing of the original development agree - mont. i, Please indicate if you have any quentluns on this item at this point in time. I JLM:s)k Encl. ,n ;:06n5k�hE kx.4.' $.V. • POS. CF P)-. n. r . •a.4.��• •, .49:•! Eo I -2:; -- C tyiVOOR °NECo u rVuCrwDN_ ws Ona a sd5°w�Gw. N t Au AUG 201986 nuwaw one <rv¢ cxwrtw cleat 7) @181�)11)La;l;2)@!g�5P6 C Y' ep9ouoo. .,awtt l wxwx.. ..ORM V /..CZI.I.` I •wL4 GLIIOPMIt OtNa•1099 ..."N o ...so. s /n(too 990.0.01 Y o C.MO rot OU. wAwrnx a0 Lcw utflnonc+1 tll a 91 -ant L y MEMORANDUM TO: Brad Buller, City Planner„ City of F<ancho Cucamonga FROM: James L. Markman, City Attorney It DATED: Auguut 26, 1986 RE: Amendment No. 1 to Schlosser Development Agreement Attached in reference to the above matter please find the following ducumentsa 1. A form of Amendment No. 1 to Development Agree- ment which simply extends the term of the agreement from twenty -five years to forty years; and 2. A form of ordinance 'or ultimate Council con- sideration. r As you will recall, we were directed to process ' this amendment at the last Council meeting at the same time that the Council continues to process the original davelop- went agreement. I suggest that you supply a copy of the proposed amendment to Ted Hopson for his review. The amand- ' ment is rather simple so I cannot see him wishing to modify + it Then, the amendment must be processed as a zone change identical to the processing of the original development agree - mont. i, Please indicate if you have any quentluns on this item at this point in time. I JLM:s)k Encl. ,n ;:06n5k�hE kx.4.' $.V. • POS. CF P)-. n. r . •a.4.��• •, .49:•! S AMENDMENT 11O. 1 TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT That Development Agreement concerning that real property described in Exhibit "A" hereto and approved by Ordinance No. 296 of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga by and between Phillip D.Schlosser and Elaine M. Schlosser, husband and wife, as community property, Albert W. Holquin, Jr. and Roberta J. Holquin, husband and wife, as community property, Jeffrey P. Schlosser and Jacqueline L. Schlosser, husband and wife, as community property, and David At. Richardson and Joan M. Richardson, husband and wife, as community property ( "Property Owners ") and the City of Rancho Cucamonga ( "City ") hereby is mended as of this day of , 1986, as follows: 1. Paragraph 9 is amended to road in words and figures as follows: ' "9. Term of A resmant. The term of th.s Agreement shall commence on tne date hereof, regard- less of the date of actual execution hereof, and shall continue for forty (40) years and may be extended by City and Property Cwnors thereafter." 2. Other than as expressly amended hereby, the above - referenced Development Agreement and each and every term and pro- vision thereof shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 has been executed by the parties and shall be offective on the day and year first above written regardless of the date of actual execution hereof. CITY; CITY OF RANChO CUCA::ONGA BY: aye BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk , 3 city Attcrney "•' m 0 PROPERTY OWNERS: Phillip D. ScElonser Address: Elaine . Schlosser Address: Albert Holguin, Jr. Address: Roberta J. R0Tcu- Address: Jaffrey P. Schlosser Address: Jacqueline L. Sc: oseer , Address: , �i I av>. d M. Ricar son Address; Jean M. Richardson Address: STATE OF CALIFORNIA I ) as. COUNTY OF SAN DEP11ARDINO ) On , 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public n and or said County, personally appeared PHILLIP D. SCHLOSSER, ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, ALBERT HOLGUIN, JR., ROB::RTA J. HOLGUIN, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER, JACQUELINE L. SCHLOSSER, DAVID M. RICHARDSON, JEAN M. RICHARDSON, proved to me on the basis of satisfactory aaidence to be the persons whose name are sub- ' scribed to this instrument, and acknowledged to me that they executed it Y' otary Pu c [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) as. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) On , 1986, before me, the undersigned, a Nrtary Public-17-a-n-rfor said County, personally appeared , and , proved to me on the basis '? or ants actory evidence to be Mn persona who executed this instru- ment as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Rancho x�- ?, Cucamonga, a municipal corporation existing and organized under the p, i 1 i, i 1 Ef r, laws of the State of California, and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed it. (SEAL] Notary PUlic • 1 1 ' •�t.j.L ;a s ,rot EXHIBIT "A" (Legal Descr[ption) Parcel 1: Lots 25 and 26, Town of Rochester, as per Plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, Official Records of San Bernardino County, + EXCEPTING THEREFROM, the west 438.66 feet thereof. Parcel 2: The west 438.66 feet of Lots 25 and 26 of Rochester, as per Plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, Official Records of San Bernardino County, EXCEPTING THEREFROM, the west 50 feet of said Lot 25. Parcel 3: Lot 27, according to Map of Rochester, as per Plat recorded in Book 9 of Maps, Page 20, Official Records of San Bernardi.o County, California. 1;� r+ ■ e ORDINANCE NO. 3 0.3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE DEVELOPMENT ARREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCN3 CUCPMNGA AND rHILIP D. SCHLOSSER ELAINE M. SCHLOSSER, ALBERT HOLGUIN, JR., ROBERTA J. HOLGUIN, JEFFREY P. SCHLOSSER, JACQUELIN L. SCHLOSSER, DAVID M. RICHAPOSON AND GENE M. RICHARDSON. REGARDING THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND CURRENT OPERATIONS OF THE INDUSTRIAL FACILITY ON 27.7 ACRES AT THE SOUTMLEST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND ROCHESTER AVENUE - APN 229 - 111 -05, 17 AND 18 The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council finds and eatermines as follows: A. Government Code Section 65864 through 675869.5 authorizes the City to enter into binding Development Agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property. B. The City Council duly held public hearings on the Development Agreement and approved the Agreement on September 3. 1986 by the a. motion of Ordinanpe No. 296. C. Three copies of the proposed Amendment to the Development Agreement (as contained in Exhibit I attached) between the City and Philip D. Schlosser, Elaine 11. Schlosser, Albert Holguin, Jr., Roberta J. Holguin, Jeffrey P. Schlosser, Jacquelin L. Schlosser, David M. Richardson and Gene M. Ricnardson are on file in the office of the City Clerk, and the some are public records of the City. D. Paragraph 9 of the Development Agreement is amended to read in words and figures as follows: "9. Term of A reeaw:nt. The term of this Agreement shall commence on a ereof, regardless of the date of actual execution hereof, and shall continue for forty (40) rears and may be extended by City and Property A:iers thereafter." E. Other than as expressly amended hereby, the above- referenced Development Agreement and each and every tern and provision thereof shall regain in full force and effect. F. The Planning Commission and City Council duly held public hearings on the proposed Amendment to the Development Agreement. G. The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamongs recomended approval of this Amendment to the City Council by minute order on October B. 1986. D-3b a 1 , v i a t� s. i' 4h t CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE HO. SCHLOSSER AGREEMERT AMENO,YE',T NO. 1 October 15, 1986 Page 2 H. The provisions of the proposed Development Agreement are consistent with the Genes hl Plan, and the provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. I. The City Cou:'il ties determined that the development of property in accordance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan text 'within the City limits would be benei'icial to the public purposes of the City, in that the Broperty, developed in a menner authorized by the development approvals would e consi3tent with the City's General Plan. SECTION 2: The proposed Amendnent No. 1 to the Development Agreement between th>— e'CTq—and Philip D. Schlosser, Elaine M. Schlosser, Albert Holguin, Jr., Roberta, J. Holguin, Jeffrey P. Schlosser, Jacquelin L. Schlosser, Dcvid M. Richardson and Gene M. Richardson referred to in Section 1 above, is hereby approved. On the effectivit date of this Ordinance, the Mayor shalt sign as many copies of said Cevalopment Agreement as are necessary for the use of the parties. the City Clerk shall attest to the saw and shall deliver one fully signed copy to the property owners. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause T saax to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least race in TheOaily R.port, a newspaper of general circulation published in the 'ity, or un ar of T NTffornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. :;0/ i, i ,c V ``. 4 r =•. CITY OF RANCHO CTICAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 15, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Mutts, City Engin t- BY: Laura Psomas, Landscape Designer SUBJECT: Beautification Status RECOMWMTION: None required A G }O AJ' t � 2 O > 1977 I The purpose of this presentation is two -fold: 1. To apprise Council members of recent beautification development and; 2. To solicit comments from Council members regarding concerns, or suggestions The review will cover all phases of develupment - completed projects to those on the drawing board. Respectfully submitted, L . P:dlw III �110111111-�- 0 i I CITY OF RAN ;HO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT 'ATE: Octcber 15, 1986 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Laura Psomas, Landscape Designer SUBJECT: Haven Avenue Median Landsape Concept RECONNENOATION V.;7.✓ It is recommended that the City Council affirm the Planning Commission approved Haven Avenue Median Landscape Concept. I. DEESIGN CONCEPT: The pro •,red design concept incorporates a bleed of stone cobble trea mant, turf and colorful groundcover surrounding flowering Magnoli:, trees. At key intersections Date Palms will be pl,nted and uplighting provided for drama and accent. The concept proposes an 80/20 landscape to rockscape treatment with not less than 30% nor more than 50% of the landscape elraents should incorporate turf. The planter areas will alternat, from side to side bordered by hand - placed cobble. An additional accent will be provided by incorporating an exposed aggregate finish into the median curb face. II COMMUNITY REYIEU: The proposed design concept was developed over a X oaciDincv witn me untano center ana at cne same a unique "sense of entry' from our City to the San III PROJECT SCOPE 1619 SCHEDULING: The pproposed design concept is budgeted for implementation from Foarth Street to just north of Wilson Avenue. Street plans are currently coaplete from Arrow Route to 19th Street. With Council approval of the design concept consultants will be ordered to conplete working drawings for the remainder of the project to allow a spring - summer construction schedule. The project will be funded with a combination of Beautification Fees and developer contributions. Respectful s b9/tted, LBH: a33 r d. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA STAFF REPORT f DATE: October 15, 1986 LIN 10: Mayor and Members of the C1t uncil FROM: Brad Buller, City Plenne -� SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PRELIMIMARY SCOPE OF WORK FOR MARKET STUDY ON Rraw lT RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review the preliminary scope of the study 'and direct staff to finalize the scope incorporating ally Council comaents and proceed with the selection process for a consultant. BACKGROUND: During the City Council's discussion of minimman lot sizes an m n muta dwell'ng unit sizes for single family detached and zero lot line housing, the City Council accepted the BIA's offer to fund a study on the impact of the proposed changes being considered. Since the September 17th City Council meeting, staff has prepared the following preliminary scope of work for the market study as directed by the City Council. The purpose of the survey is to provide additional factual :ate for the Council to use in the decision making process. The pr:mary objective of the study wwuld be to analyze Oit impact the proposed or any increase in lot size and unit size •road have upon the housing market in Rancho Cucamonga. In addition to the primary objective as noted above, it is proposed that the study: 1. Id+ntify current market as to type of house for sale or rent, size of units and cost of single family and multiple family housing in the local market area. Profile by density category ownership versus rental unit size and number of bedrooms. 2. Compare Rancho Cucamonga with other communities in this market area (Gntaril Fontana, and Upland). 3. Compare today's first -time buyer market with housing targeted for first -time buyer ten years ago. Pro.'11e by density category, tnit size, and number f bedrooms and iut 31ze. 4. Analyze impact of proposed Increases In lot sizes and minimum unit sizes upon economic feasibility, sale /rental price, and rate of construction. d 71 L% ' r CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Minimum Lot and Unit Size Preliminary Scope October 15, 1986 Page 2 5. Analyze curulative impact of proposed incr)ases in minimum unit sizes and lots sizes upon Rancho Cucamonga and the local market a.•ed (Ontario, Fontana, Upland and Panrho Cucamonga). 6. Malyze house sale trends of small lot develodatents from 1976 to 1996. Staff met with a member of the BIA and a ma:•ketiog conszltant to review the scope of cork for the study. Both agreed that the scope provided sufficient information to proceed with a study as directed by the ,,- Council. 4- 80:jr 5 ,r •' CITY OF FANCIIO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATBt October 13, 1966 • TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Mark R. lorimer. Administrative Aualyst SUBJECT, VECTOR CONTROL RPRRSa OF favf0yL1 P It is recommended that the City Council direct staff to send a letter to the Local Agency Formation Commis %ion requesting thAt this item he considered at a future date when the City of Rancho Cucamonga can batter evaluate those services provided by West Valley Vector Control. As was earlier explained to the Ci Cr Council, the City has received notice from the Local Agency Formation Commiasion that the Vest Talley Vector Control Diarrict has requested Rancho Cucamonga be included in the District's sphere of influence. LAFCO has requested the City's response at whether it will Aupport, oppose or remain neutral on the sphere of influence question. A hearing uitb LAFCO has been tentatively sot for November 19, 1906. In further discussing this issue with staff members of the Vent Valley Vector Control District, the City Row has bettar understanding of the District's intent to include Rancho Cucamonga In its sphere of influence. Basically. the District wishes to establish its boundaries so that it may bugio Planoiug to provide future sarvieea. While Vest Valley wishes to have Rancho Cucamonga placed within its apbera of influence in order ro some day Anne: the City, District staff auutes the City that a request for sunaxetion is not within this next caloadar year The District also claim that a future annexation would r.quire a an l agreement between the District and the City. Rowever. LAPCO staff cl m that the City doom not bwe the authority to blcck any ■nnexatior, :,L rather may influence the final decision of the. This brings up lee question cf bow each iufluence does the City of Rancho Cueaenngx actually have. a3i; Vector Contrl $photo of Influence October 15, 1966 Page 2 As was explained earlier, general funds art now allocated for the City's contract with the District for fly control services. While there is no specified termination period in the City's contract with the District, it was understood at the time the agreement was made that an sightean -muth trial period would be necessary to "&,care the services being provided. Less tbno six moths has elapsed since the City awarded the contract to the West valley vector Control District. To date, the District is doing a good job to providing fly control services within the City. At this point, rather than directly oppose, rasein neutral or support the @photo of influence of rancho Cucaoonga into the District boundaries, it would be more appropriate to roquest that LA1CO tabla this issue to.a future date after enough time has elapsed for the City and tba Commission to'batter evaluate the effectiveness of tbosn services providad by the District. After ae appropriate period of time. a year is suggested, the City could make a future decision oe whether or not it was in the beat interest of tha City to continue contractual services utilizing general fdods or to support Wear valley victor Control in its efforts at securing the $photo of influence of Rancho Cucamonga 'and inevitably annex our City into its District. - Should you have a^; questions or comma,ats regarding this issue. please contact se. NRL/dja -337 c- i i, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 15, 1986 T0: City Council sod City Manager PROM: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clark 8OB]ECT: RLpt[Y Op }en ►OE[D R • eO::�i !Ot A BOAT OHE OP A PIt girt VITt TUX YMCA FOR S$t Cif gTt0 C7701 OP I. TY A RANCHO COCAM_OVCA The City Attorney will be forwarding the to you prior- to the Council meeting. Staff report will also be available at that time. BAA /djs r� a. S� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date, October 15, 1986 To, City Council and City Manager From, Bill Holley, Community Services Oirectar Subject, Authorization by City Council for the Mayor to arec m both the 'Agreement for the Acquisition of a Park Site' and the 'Dansity bonus Agreement' between the City and Jean Deukmejian, Trustee for the Deukmejian Family Trust, relating to a proposed neighborhood park site located on the south side of Feron Boulevard, east of Turner AVenue. City Council Agendo Itmt C -5, October 15, 1986 RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend execution of the attached agraemaats which provided for a five acre neighborhood perk site in the itnzth Town area. BACKGROUND, The 'deal paint' basics containad in the attached agromantn are, 1. The Deukmejian Trust Will provide five acted Of the 13.5 acre site to the City for park purposes, in exchange fort 2. The City assuming responsibility for the installatien of the Mapter Plan Stom Drain System improvements, along with roadway, curbs, gutters, sidevalka, street Sighting, drains and fire hycrants as Would abut Peron Boulevards 3. The City Would grant and /or secure an underground access eacment across the park for the remaining parcel to tie into drainage ane sewer lines in Turner, and 4. That a density honor of 20 units be granted by the City on tse remaining piece. This works well on this particular site and maolvus the rrevimely expressed coucernn over rroject generated impact on the surracnding community. For examrla, with the current zoning on the 13.5 acres of 4 -8, aoveloped to the highest level would generate 100 units an the site without density bonus. Under our plan there will be a cap limit of 88 unite on the property with a density bonus. That translates to a density of 10.5 units per acre on the remaining 8.5 acres or 6.5 when looked at across the entire site. Bottom line, either way ynu look at it, there will be 20 lees units brought into the community in connection with the parcel. All planning and design review standard requirements mcain in place. 1 L J City Council Agenda North Town Parr. Site October 15, 1986 Page 2 (' CONNENTSa he are pleased to bring thin item before you ... finally. The { execution of this agreement will complete a commitment for community C improvements made over ten years ago. That commitment contained three elements: The construction of the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Centers the installation of street improvements and sldevalks in the North Tom areas and ` lastly, purchase of a neighborhood park site to provide recreation facilities in the north Tom ana. , The project has a unique set of financing factors: • RDA funding will accomplish the infrastructure improvemcntas • The lrlrastracturs improvements will he exchanged for the land, and, • CDBG money will be used only for park development purposes on the site. The park project. has also sorvee as a catalyst to resolve other problems in the anat • Resolves the Farwa Boulevard drainage problems and, • Resolves the conmunl.ty concerns over a more naely developed residential parcel that would have "suited has not the park came into being. Lastly, it must be noted that this project tea a real tom effort by a lot of individuals each contributing vitally to its suttees... it simply could not have been done without them. Of particular note, however, area • Pete Pitassi and holly Kitchell from the Park Development Comianion who met with the community and staff through the procosss • Otto Krcut_1, Senior Planner, who believed in and supported the project, fought with HUD to keep it alive, and figured out the mechanics of a workable density bonus agreement, end, a Necho Gracia, of course, who for over ten, long yea" believed in me � project and single handedly made sure that a neighborhood park in the North TC.m ana was not forgotren. Then is lttle else to add ... you an all familiar with the project... we ask , your support. TharJc you. .r e' AGREEMENT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF A PARR SITE This Agreement is made and entered into as of the dates set forth below opposite the names of the parties hereto by and between JEAN DEUF=IAN, trustee for the Deukmejian Family Trust, UDT March 22, 1979 or assignee ( "OWNER" hereinafter) and the CITY 07 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation ( "CITY" hereinafter). HIIH&hHSIH: A. Recitals. (i) OWNER owns fee title in and to that real property described in Exhibit "A" to this agreement and hereinafter referred to as "the OWNER's parcel." (i!) CITY desires to acquire a site for the establishment of a neighborhood park in that portion of CITY within which the OWNER's parcel is located. (iii) OWNER is willing to dedicate to CITY that portion of the OWNER's parcel consisting of approximately five acres, described in Exhibit "B" hereto and hereinafter referred to as "the park site" so long as the potential value of the remainder of the OWNERS part for residential development is retained. Said remainder is described in Exhibit "C" hereto and hereinafter 1s referred tc as "the remainder parcel ". (iv) It is the purpose of this Agreement to provide for the dedication of the park site to CITY while retaining the potential value of the remainder parcel for residential development pursuant to the Density Bonus Agreement referred to hereinafter. i . •ir B. Agreement. 1. CITY, at its Bole cost and expense, shall forthwith procass through recordation, a parcel map in accordance with the provisions of the California Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Sections 66410 at seq.) and CITY'a subdivision ordinance dividing the OWNER's parcel into two parcels consisting of the park site and the remainder parcel. CITY shall complete said subdivision procesu within nine (9) months from the Hate of execution of this 'Agreement by CITY. nWNER agrees to promptly and fully cooperate In said subdivision process and to take any and all acts necessary to allow CITY to complete said subdivision process. 2. Upon completion of the subdivision process referred to in paragraph 1 herainabova, and within thirty (30) days of receipt of a notice of the completion of said process dslivared by CITY, OWNER shall dedicate to CITY by grant deed the park site free and clear of any known encumbrances with the exception of (a) the reserved easement for sewer line purposes referred to in paragraph 3 hereinbelow and those items numbered set forth on that preliminary title report numbered 1 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 sat forth on that preliminary title report numbered 874554 and dated August 5, 1986 of TScor Title Insurance Company of California ( "the Title Company" hereinafter) on *Ae subject of the OWNER's parcel. CITY shall pay any loci rotary transfer tax payable as a result of said transfer Co..7urrent with or forthwith following recordation of said grant deed, CITY shall obtain title insurance from the Title Company insuring that fee title to the park site is vested in CITY subject only to the encumbrances specified above in this paragraph 2. Once CITY obtains said policy, i!s sole recourse in the event of any subsequent dispute as to tile to or encumbrances on the park site shall " against the Title Company. 3. The Grant peed by which OWNER donates the park site to CITY shall reserve to the grantor an easement 2^ feet in width across the park site necessary to provide sewer' 2 service from the remainder parcel to that twalve inch line located in Turner Avenue, tt.± specific location of which is to be established when a site plan for the development of the remainder parcel is finally approved through applicable CITY planning processes. The specify location of said sower easement shall be established by OWNER, subject to approval by thn CITY, we as to adequately service remainder parcel in the most effective manner for said installation, while preserving to the maximum extant possible the use of the park site for recreational purposes. The parties understand that oaid easement may best most the needs of CITY and OWNER at a location in close proximity to the most souLharly lot line of the park site and the remainder parcel and that such location may requira the establishment of a sewer easement across the parcel of property immediately co the east of the park site and immediately to tb: west of Turner Avenue. If the " establishment of such easement is neceasary, CITY will establish that easement at OWNER's sole cost and expanse. Further, if the dnsign of any sewerage system servicing the developed park on the park site in adequately sized and located, OWNER may tap into said sewerage system to conduct sewage from the remainder parcel to Turner Avenue, provided that the location and sizing of the sewerage system servicing the park shall be designed to service the park only at CITY's sole discretion. 4. CITY shall commence construction of a park on the park site as s :on as practicable following CITY's aequirition of fee title thereto. The entirety of the park site shall be developed as a park open to the general public within thirty -six ( ?5) months of CITY's acquisition of fee title thereto. Neitmar the iiL rovement of the P par's site nor the construction of the public improverents referred Lo in paragraph S below shaal physically adversely affect the remainder parcel by way of flooding or any other such physical impact. 3 S. The CITY agrees to cause the following public ! mprovements to be constructed and completed at the CITY,s - 'o cost and expense at a time prior to and /or reasonable cL.,rdinated with the Development, and in no event later than January 1, 1990: (a) All of the CITY's now or hereafter enacted or required master plan hydrology, drainage or storm drain facilities along the street right -of -way width of the Development along Feron Boul4vardi and (b) All road improvements as may be required by the CITY as a condition to approval of the Development site plan, or the granting of any discretionary approval required or authorized by the City Council or Planning Commission of the CITY; or required for issuance of the CITY's build�:y permit, including, without limitation, those required along the street right -of -way width of the Development along Faxon Boulevard, including but not limited to, curbs, gutters, drains, sidewalks, fire hydrants, and street lighting facilities. If said road improvements are constructed prior to the construction of the Development, the CITY shall place driveway aprons from Feron Boulevard to tha Development complying with the CITY's then current standards at locations reasonably requested in writing by OWNER, provided that if those aprons are thereafter required to be relocated or removed as a condition of approval of the Development OWNER shall relocate the apron location or locations at OWNERIe 8014 Coat and expense. The CITY agrees not to exact any public improvement or dedication requirements as a condition of construction of the Development, but the CITY shall so exact its applicable fees. 6. Attachoi hereto as exhibit "D" is a document entitled "Density Bonus Agreement" specifying the number of residential units which may be constructed on the remainder parcel in accordance with the terms and provisions there :f. 4 It is the intention of the parties hereto to enter into said Density Bonus Agreement and this Agreement simultaneously ani this Agreement is ccnditioned upon the parties entering into said Density Bonus Agreement. 7. Any and all notices, requests or other communication required or permitted to be given under this agraament or by rsawon of this Agreement shall be in waiting and shall be deamed to have b -ten given when delivered in person, or live (5) busineso days after sailing by certified ' or registered mail, return receipt requested, first -class t postage prepaid, if sailed in the State of California, or seven (7) business days after so sailing elsewhere in the continental portion of the United States of America, or the data of actual receipt as indicated on the return receipt, whichever date first occurs) or tan (10) hours after the time dispatched by talegras or tablet in every case addressed to the parties hereto as follows: A. If to CITY, to: CITY OF RANCHO C'JCANONCA 9320 Baseline Road, Suite C P.O. Box 807 Rtncho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: William L. Holley, Community Services Director and HARR04AN i ARCZYNSRI Number One Civic Cantor Circle 0 P.O. Box 1059 Brea, California 92622 -1059 r r, Attention: James L. Markman ` a City Attorney 5 B. If to OWNER, to: Ms. PAM MORALES 940 North Silent Ranch Drive Glendora, California 91740 ana SANGER, GRAYSON, GIVNER Q BOOKS First Interstate Bank Building 16633 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 604 Encino, California 91436 -1862 Attentions Michael N. Silver or such other address or addresses ac the party addressed may, from tide to Lima, designate in writing in the matu or herein specified. Any notice dispatched by telegram or cable shall be reaffirmed by the sender within twenty -four (24) hours by mailing a confirming letter in the manner herainabove specified. S. In the avant that either party hereto brings any action at law or suit in equity in relation to this Agreement, or to declare such party4s rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party in such suit or action, on trial or appeal, in addition to all other sums to which it may be entitled, may call upon the non - prevailing party to pay a reasonable sum for its attorneys' fees and to pay all other coats and expenses that have been incurred by the prevailing party, either directly or indirectly, in connection with said y action or suit, as shall be fixed by the court. 9. Nothing in this Agreement, whether expressed ' or implied, is intended to confer any rights or remedies under or by reason of the terms and provisions hereof on any parson other than the parties to it and their respective successors 4$ and permitted assigns, nor is anything in thin Agreement intended to = =!lave or didchargs tho obligation or liability of any third person to any party tc this Agreement, nor shall any provision hereof give any third persons any right of subrogation or action over or against any party to this Agreement. 10. Unless otherwise required by a specific provision of this Agreement, time hereunder is to be computed by excluding the first day and including the last day, unless the last day is a Sunday or a legal holiday, and then it is to be excluded. 11. Each party to this Agreement agraes to cooperate by performing any further acts and by executing and delivering any and all additional doc=ents which may be reasonably necessary to carry out the terms and provisions of this Agreement, and each party to this Agreement agrees that 4t will not not in any manner whatsoever which would hinder, impede, interfere with or orchibit or make more onerous or difficult the performance ,z the other party hereto under this Agreement. 12. To the best knowledge and belief of the Parties to this Agreement, this Agreement contains no provision that is contrary to any federal, state or local law or to any regulatory requirement or other ruling or regulation of a federal, state or local agency or that would be in breach of the obligations of either or both of the parties hereto under the terns and provisions of any legally binding agreements however, if any provision of this Agreement, or any part thereof, shall at any time be held to be invalid, in whole or in part, under any applicable federal, state or local law by a court of competent jurisdiction, or by arbitrators or an administrative agency of the federal, state or 'ocal government with proper jurisdiction, then such provision or a portion thereof, as appropriate, shall remain in effect only to the extent permitted, and the remaining provisions hereof 7 shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated, unless the invalidated provision(a) shall uniquely, mdtarially and adversely affect the rights and obligations of a party to this Agreement. 13. No delay or omission to exerciso any right, power or remedy accruing to either party to this Agreement upon any breach or default of the other party to this Agreemant shall impair any right, power or remedy of the non - defaulting party nor shall it be construed to be a waiver of my such breach or default, or acquiescence therein or thereto, or of or in any similar broach or default thereafter occurringt nor shall any waiver of any single breach or default by either party to this Agreement be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach or default theretofore or thereafter occurring. All romedies, either under this Agreement or by law, equity or othe visa, shall be cumulative and not alternate. 14. This Agreement and the instruments particularly referenced herein contain the entire and exclusive agreement between the parties to it, and no promise, representation, warrant or covenant not included in this Agreement has been or is being relied upon by any party to this Agreement. All obligationa of CITY and OWNER under this Agreement are expressly stated, and no other obligations, conditions or covenants are to be implied hereunder. Each party to this Agreement has relied ur is relying upon its elm examination of the terms and provisions of this Agreement, the counsel of its own advisers, and the warranties, representations, duties and covenants contained in this Agreement. )loreover, the terms and provisions of this Agreement may not be changed orally, but only by an egraement in writing duly executed by the party against whom inforcezent of any waiver, change modification, extension or discharge in sought. t. 8 r, 15. This Agrcement and any amendment thereto may be executed in one or more counterparts, with the same legally binding affect as it all signatory parties were signatory party hereto will furnish the other party hereto with a duplicate original counterpart of this Agreement or uny amendment thereto, bearing said signatory's signatuio, 16. The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall not cause the partiaa hereto to be construed in any manner whatsoever as partners, joint venturers or agents o: each other in the performance of their respective duties and obligations under this Agreement, or subject either party to this Agreement to an/ obligation, lone, charge or expense of the other party unless the party to be held responsible has independently contracted with the claimant so as to make it directly responsible for the performance and /or payment, as appropriate, of the pertinent obligation, loss, charge or expense. 17. should any provision of this Agreement require interpretation, it is agreed that the person Dr poraons interpreting or construing the same shall not apply a presumption that the `.arms of this Agreement shall be more strictly construed against one party by reason of the rule of construction that a document is to be construed more strictly against the party thnrato who itself or through its agents or counsel prepared the lama or caused the same to be prepared, it being agreed that the agents and counsel of all of the parties hazeto have participated equally in the negotiation and preparation of this Agreement. The language in all parts of this Ag,:eenent shall be in all caaa construed simply, ' fairly, equitably and reasonably, according to its plain meaning and not strictly for or against any of the parties hereto. a 4 in. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and V.= ., their respective successors and assign%. ';w• 9 a , W" .t .w•,r, - _ Ott.- - ,. ,.,�, 19. No 'xemody or election hereunder shall bu deemed to be oxulunive but" shall, wherever possible; be cumulative with all other ieaedles at law or in equity. Tt4 Parties hereto shall be afforded the remedy of specific enforcement hereunder as the context requiros or permits. 20. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Agreement as of the dates set forth below opposite the name of each party. Dated: _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mayor Drted: By: City clerk Dated: /e,/— _ By: ' 0ea7(' Da0mejian, True a for the DOU)majian Family Trust, UDT March 22, 1979 10 I r i •;a r.; i Dated: Hy; R Jean Deuce an, Trustee for the Deukmejian Family Trust, UIYC March 22, 1979 G STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) as. i COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) on this day of , 1986, before me, r the undersigned, a Notary Pub=c ink Tor said State' x personally appeared JEFFREY ICING, known to be to be the Mayor Of the City of'Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, and y BEVERLY A. AUTHELEr, known to me to be the City clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, and said persons are known to me to ba the persons'who oxecuted the within instrument on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and acknowledged to me that the City of Rancho Cucamonga executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seat. Notary PuTiYiG ift and for said State STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) es. COUNTY OF ) On this -LL! daV of d4iOhC,f , 1966, before me, the undersigned, a Notary PuSI C-1n aM for said State, personally appeared JEAM DZU=IAH, Trustee for the Deu7m,ejian Foxily Trust, UD'f March 27., 1979, known to me to be the Trustee Cor the Deukxsjian Family Trust, UDT March 22, .? 1979, Wlftose Is ^* .A subscribad to the within instrument and acknowledged that she executed the same. ` NITN2SS ay hand and official goal. _oar P� d for said r. N=ary c and for said State OFFICIAL SEAL ANNE MACTAVW eatVH At1e a; • Gubllxu p' �; * er e.a npn m u n80 k' ' 9 ✓t • DENSITY BONDS AGREEMENT This Density Bonus Agreement is made and entered into by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga ( "City" hereinafter) and Joan Deukmejian, trustee for the Deukmejian family trust, UDT March 22, 1979, or assignee ( "Developer" heroinafter). A. Recitals. (i) California Government Code Section 65915 provides that when a developer agrees to eonctruct a houstng development including low or moderate income units, the City shall dither (1) grant a density bonus of at least twenty -five percent (251) over that allowed by the maximum density established in the Development Code and Land Use Element of the General Plank or (2) provide other incentives of equal financial value. (ii) The Developer is owner of certain real property within tine City of Ro:::ho Cucamonga and proposes to construct a residential project which includes low or moderate income units. Said project contemplated by Developer will require an increase • in the maximum allowed density as provided in the Development Code. (!il) It is the desire of the City to encourage developments designed to provide affordable dwelling units for residents of the City. In furtherance of that desire, the City is hereby willing to grant a density bonus to Developer as provided by the terms of this Agreement. R. Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Davelopsr do hereby agree as follows: Section 1• Definitions and Interpretations. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein or unless thu context thereof regpiras otherwise, the following terms shall have the respective meanings sat forth below for all purposes of this Density Bonus Agreement. (a) "Affordable units" shall mean those seventeen ` (17) units held available -or Qualified Tenants within the Development. , (b) "City" shall mean the city of Rancho Cucamonga. (e) "Development" shall mean the residential project which is to be located and canstucted on that certain ±; parcel of real property described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto r < <, and incorporated by this reference. 1 ( which the residential unite a in P the d Davelopment first are da on available for occupancy and continuing for 15 yearn families of slow "Qualified Tenants" income an defined inp ®California Haaltl% and Safety Code Section 50093, as said sections ire written. as of the tins of executing this Agreament. As of the date of executing this Agreement, said Section 50093 provides as set forth in 2r:ibit "8" ettached hereto and inccrporated herein by this reference as though fully sot forth h,.-�in. Section Z• Oe SL19ri= Aporcval Coned Alan. Approval of the density bonus agreement does not constitute approval of the required site plans, conditional use permits and /or an other discretionary approval authorised by the Planning Co�lssion or city Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This Agreamont may be oxecuted by the City and the Developer wither prior to or concurrently with th.ad apprOalst however, no a specific condition of site plar approval and building permit letuanca, the Agreement shall 'is executed and recorded pursuant to the terms and condition of thin Agreement. Section 2. Onaratinn 21 Develooment. (a) If any or all of the affordable unite should be offered an rental units, the Developer agree• as to such rental units as follows: (i) For a period of fifteen (15) years following the commencement of the Qualified Project Period, the affordable units in the Devalopae.:t shall be occupied or hold vacant and available for occupancy by Qualified Tenants. (ii) Tf at any time during the Qualified Project Period the Developer may be unable to rent or lease the affordable units to Qualified Tenants, the Developer agrees to hold unrenttd and vacant: said affordable units and to offer such affordable unit only for occupancy to Qualified Tenants as described in thin Agreement. ) 12 at any Peden a Qualified Tenant occupying an anina Qualified affordable rental unit should cases to be a Qualified Tenant, the Developer may treat such tenant independent of this Agreement. If much a Qualified Tenant should cones to qualify pursuant to the terms of this Agrsamant, the Developer shall hold any then vacant unit available for Qualified Tenants at an affordable rent. If, however, at the time such Qualified Tenant ceases to be qualified pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, there are no vacant units in the Development, the Developer shall hold vacant the next avai =albs unit for occupancy by Qualified Tenants at an affordable rent. (iv) That Developer shall covenant as part of each rental or lease agreement with each now Qualified Tenant, that Ouch Qualified Tenant shall not sublet said affordable unit without the express approval of Developer or his representative and that Daveloper ehnll not allow any individual Qualified Tenant to so sublet in violation of the terms of tLis Agreement. (v) To prepare and submit to the City within 90 days following the beginning of the Qualified Project period, and annually upon such date, a Certificate of Continuing Program Compliance executed by the Developer of its representatives, describing the name, rddress, and the Qualified Tenant status for each Qualified Tenant within the development so to insure compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. (b) If any or all of the affordable unite within the Development are offered as saleable units, the Developer agrees that suct. units shall be offered only to Qualified Tenants as provided herein. This ;zrovision shall only apply to the first sale of ouch an affordable unit and will not be binding on subsequent sales or transfers of such unit. (c) All affordable units within the Development shall be offered for rent, lease or sale to Qualified Tenants on a first -come first serve beats and will be rented, leased or sold to such Qualified Tenants without regard to race, color, religion, gender, marital status, or national origin. S99I1M A. 2p_as1L.e bonus, Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, together with all terms and conditions of any applicable discretionary approval, the City hereby grants to the Developer a twenty (20) unit- increase In the otherwise naximam allowable residential density under the Rancho Cucamonga Development Cod[ for a maximum total of eighty -eight (88) units. .99ction 1. 2AJ2 9t Transfer = Develooment. The Developer hereby agrees that in the event of any sale, transfer or other disposition of the Development, or any interest therein, the Developer and the Purchaser /Transferee shall serve upon the City notice in writing that the Developer has fully explained the provisions of thin Agreement to the Purchaser /Transferee and that the Purchaser /Transferee agrees to fulfill the Developer's duties and obligations under this Agreement. 1 Section 1. 1nY2"Dtary TIM cz Substaat"I D12tMa2tJM. Upon evidence satisfactory to the city that compliance with the provision" of this Agraessnt is no longer possible due to substantial destruction of the Development, the Developer shall not be subject to the terms of the provisions of this Agreement. In the event of any involuntary transfer or any seizure of Developer's interest in the Development, the terms and provisions of this A'freement mhall be binding upon much transferee. Section Z. Ten. This Agreement shall bacons aftective upon its execution by the parties hereto and its recordation as provided herein. Except as provided in the irmadiatsly proceeding section, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for the Qualified Project Period. Seccti q A. conversion at =tz. If, after project approval for toe devolopment and prior to the expiration of the Qualified Project Period, the developer should convert affordable rental units into saleable units, the developer shall, in addition to ail conversion requirements of stets and local law, offer much converted affordable units only to Qualified Tenants as provided herein. 2=i2A Q. Covenants j;Q a= Plith =l iADd. The Developer hereby subjects the Development and the land described in Exhibit a ?" hereto to the covenants, reservations end restrictions as met forth in this Agreement. The City and the Developer hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, reservations an4 restrictions an set forth herein shall be dammed covenants liming with the land and shall pace to and be binding upon the Developer's succaosors and assigns in title or interest to the Development. Each and every contract, dead or other instrument hereinafter axecuted, covering or conveying the Development or any portior thereof nhall conclualvely be held to have been executed, lolivered and accepted subject to tale covenants, reservations and restrictions exprossed in this Agreement, regardless of whether such covenants, reservations and restrictions sea net forth in such contract, dead or other instrument. Section IQ Burdgn Aad .?annfit• City and Developer hereby declare their understanding and intent that the burden of the covenants, reservations and restrictions sat Forth herein touch and concern the land in that the Developer's legal interest in the Development is rendered �r t, less valuable thereby. The City and Developer hereby further declare their understanding and intent that the benefit of ouch covenants touch and concern the land by enhancing and increasing the enjoyment and use of the Development by Qualified Tenants, the intended beneficiaries of such Covenants, reservations and restrictions, and by furthering the public purposes for which this Agreement is adopted. Further, the parties hereto agree that such covenants, ranervations and restrictions benefit all other real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ssssivm U. 'gznoo. The covenants, reservations and restrictions described herein shall apply uniformly to the entire Development in order to establish and carry out a common plan for use, development and improvemant of the land on which the Develo constructed. pment is to be 3ect:ion 12• Default flfi4 EnLoreoment. If the Developer defa•rlts in the performance of observance of any covenant, reservation or restriction as set forth in thin Agreement, and if ouch default remains uncured fox a period of 30 days after notice to the Developer or should the Developer not diligently and continuobsly prosecute such cure to the appropriate completion, the City may Coolers that the Developer is in default under the terms of this Agreement and may take any one or more of the following steps at its option: equity to require the Developer to perform its dobligations under the terms of this Agreement or to enjoin the Developer from any act3 which may be in voolation of this Agreement. Copies of all lbooks and /ur records of inspect, h Devloper pertainingato the Development. (e) To take whatever actions at, law or in equity in the nama of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as may appear necassaty or desirable to enforce the obligations, covenants and agreements of the Developer pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. event In the at law or in equity to require tithe brings action Developer to perform its obligations under the terms of this Agreement, the City shill recover from the Developer any and all costs and attorneys fees incurred therein. No delay in enforcing the provisions hereof as to any branch or violation chall impair, damage, or waive the right of ti the City to enforce the same or to obtain relief for the continuation or repetition of each broach or violation or any similar breach or violation thereof at any later time or times. S.92t12n 1a.. Indemnification 2t city. The Developer hereby agrees that ft shall indemnify or hold harmless the City and its officers cr employees from and v against: person arising from mayny causeall whatsoeveryin or on connection behalf with thany Developments (ii) Any and all claims arising fran any act or omission of the Developer or any of its agents, contractors, servants or employees in connection with the development: and (i liabilitiesincurred l costs, in conection with any suuchxp claim or proceeding brought thereon. In the event that any action or proceeding is brought against the City or any of its officers or employees with respect to which indemnity may be sought hereunder, Developer, upon written notice from the City shall assume the investigations and defensa thereof, including the employment of counsel and the payment of all expanse. The Developer and the City shall have the right to employ separate counsel in any such action cr proceeding and to participate in the investigation and defens, thereof and Developer shall pa-r the fees and expenses of any such separate counsel retained by the City. Sergi 11. Recording Aa fig. As a building permit on specific the Development, prior he p Developer shall cause ause this Agreement and any amendments or supplements thereto to be recofdad and filed in conjunction with the Development in the Office of the county Recorder, County of San Bernardino, and in any other such places as the City may reasonably request. Developer shall pay all fees and charges incurred in connection with such recording and filing. Additionally, the Developer shall provide the City with a conformed copy of the recorded Agreement prior to the issuance of building permits on the Development. Section L'). ZQY4:nJM "U. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Section U. AmanduntA. This Agreement may be amended only by a written 6 V instrument executed by the parties hereto. Section 1Z. Notice. Agreement ..sa1 notice require to be given by tha terms of this a 4r provided b registered mail at the addresses • spocified below or at any such other address as may bo specified in writing by the parties hereto: city: City of Rancho Cucamonga Post office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Attention: City Clerk Developers . Seotion It. Severabilit . If any provision, clause, section, subsection, paragraph or sentence of this Agreement shall be declared invalid or illegal by a court of competent jurisdiction, the validity and enforceability of the remaining portions of this Agreement shall not in any way be effected or impaired. Section 11. Rights And Oblieatiens. ' City agrees that Developer's rights and obligations in this Agreement are lolly assignable. vyr 7 ,wA x " 8 0 APPROVED A TO FORM: `F city Attorney s IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Developer have executed this Agreement a of the dates set opposite their signatures. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Dated: DEVELOPER BY Jeffrey King, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga Dated: fO �O N. By 011.4-a • „� Jean Daukmsj , trustee for the Deukmejian f:,mily trust, UDT March 22, 1979, or assignee STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) so. COUNTY OF SAN EERNRDINO On this day of- �__, 1986, before mi, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, persoAally appeared JEFFREY KING, known to me to be the mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, and said person is ' known to me to be th:4 person who executed thwithin instz-umanz on tjK, behalf of the City of T.encho Cucamonga and acknowledged to me I that the City of Rancho tv=amonga executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said State 8 �e STATE OF CALIFORNIA) '3 COUNTY OF On this day of .LLZ- , 1586, before me, the undersigned, a Notary public in and for said State, personally appeared JEAN DEUMIFZIAN, proved to me to be the Trustee for the Deukmejian family trust, DDT March 22, 1986, or assigned, and said person is known to me to be the parson who executed the within instrument on behalf of the Deukmejian family and acknowledged to me that the Deukmejian same. family executed the WITNESS my hand and official seal. OFF SEAL + n ANNE E NkARAVkSN LC.N G�4�� • NOTARy fOWC•0AVlONNN US b men a0etlfp tary public in and for said state r Jyy yL a " r T "Ar �'td+�r• J�. e f Ja� Section 50093. Persons and Families of Low or Moderate Income; Division Definition's "Persons and families of low or moderate income: means Persons and families whose income does not exceod 120 percent of area median income, adjusted for family size by the department in accordance with adjustment factors adopted and amended from time to time by the United Staten Department of housing and Urban Development pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937. Such income limits shall be published as regulations b) the department. However, the agency" and the department joiitly, or either acting with the concurrence of the Secretary of thai Business and Transportation Agency, may permit the agency to use higher income limitations in desigh.ted geographic areau of the state, upon a determination that 1e; percent of the median income in the Parti^ular geographic area is too low to qualLfy a substantial number of pars. is and families of low or moderate income who can afford rental i home purchase of housing finances pursuant to Part 3 (commencing with Section 50900) with-cut subsidy. "Persons and families of low or moderate inccme" inclulen very Low income households, as def ned in Selection 50105 and lower income households as defined in Section 50079.5, and includes parsons of low income, persons and families of moderato income, and middle- income families. As used in this division: (a) "Persons of low income" means persons or families who are. eligible for financial assistance specifically provided by a governmental agency for the benefit of occupants of housing financed pursuant to this division. (b) "Persons and families of moderate income" or "middle- income families" means uersons and families of low or moderate income whose income exceeds the income limit for lower incomo households. As used in this s•ctiol, "area median income" means the median family income o2 a geographic area of tho state, as annually satimated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development pursuant to Section 8 of the United states Housing Act of 1937. In the event such federal determinations of area median income are diacountinued, tha department shall establish and publish as regulations income limits for psrson8 and families of low or moderate income for all geographic areas of the state at 120 percant of area median income, adjusted for family size and revised annually. The department shall establish and publish a general definition of income, including inclusions, exclusions, and allowances, for qualifying persons under the income limits this seo*ion and Sections 50079.5 and 50105, to be used where no other federal -r state definitions of income apply. Such io definition nead not be estai.ishsd by regliation. the departmoNothing rca adapting 3aparatsZ tamilyensi othe factor, or programrltic definitions Df income v households, parsons, Lnd families for programs of the department, as the Cass may be. EXHZBZT "B" 11