No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/09/21 - Agenda Packeti' IF V1 ,t CITY _ - COUNCIL A G E N D A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays — 7:30 p.m. September 21, 1988 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, tr.rw Pamela J. Wright. Pp r.. Deborah N. Brown, c....,f..,,ne„ Charles J Buquet, Je15cy King. e.. a.mu, .W• Lauren N Wasserman. can v...r„ James Markman. on trm.p Beverly A Authelet. n.. a„i Qty office. 989.1851 Lone Put 980.3145 "y'j. .Y i II ra Y PAGE City Council Agenda Septavbez 21, 1988 1 All itma rubmitted for the City Council Agenda rut be In Writing. The deadline for submitting theme items is 5s00 rep p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City •�` "�#' Clerk's Office receivas all such its". ,? A. CALL TO ORDER a 2' 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag. it 2. Roll Calls Brown ., Buquat _, Stout Yin& _, and Wright _. �� B. I1010UC(�QrS/IRESLEfATI0E9 1. Presentation of a proclamation to Ralph Levis for his i outstanding service on the Rancho Cucamonga Community �•• Foundation Board of Directors. • C. Caffmw rsm.vnma ti The following Consent Calendar items are crpected to be routine and mn- eoutroveniel. They del be acted open by the Council at ons time Without discuss, w. Any item may be removed by a Councilsember or member of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Minutest September 7, 1988 (grown and SWut absent) 2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/7/88 and 9/14/88, 1 and Payroll ending 9/1/88 for the total amount of $1,672,816.82. 3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Cenral I 9 Public Premisess Ride A While, Carole 6 William McIntosh, 9469 Foothill Boulevard. 4. Approval to execute a Professional Services Agreement I1 Amendment (CO 88 -084) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and ASL Consulting Snbineers for the Church - Decmosa Store Drain to clarify the fee schedule and correct the Exhibit callouts. Vr City Council Agenda a ydi September 21, 1988 PAGE 2 f 'i. S. Approval of Contract Change Order No. 5 (00 33 -062) for 12 the preparation of final construction plans and " specifications for Day Creek Improvement P%vject by Willdan Associates in the amount of $44,500, to bring the contract total to $670,283 to be paid from Day Creek Improvement fund (A /C 86-4637 - 6028). 6. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 87- 13 163) for a Professional Services Agreement with HSI Consultants to provide additional services in preparing striping =4 signing place, specifications, estimates for 19th Street from Archibald to Hermosa and from Cartilla to Haven Avenue and redesign driveway at APH 202 - 191 -28 for the amount of $7,160 to be funded from Systems Dsvolopment Fund Account No. 22 -4637 -8744. 7. Approval to award the "Ninth Street Rehabilitation 14 Improvement Project between Vineyard Avenue and Baker Avenue" to Gentry Brothers Incorporated for the amount of $120,330 ($109,388.65 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Gas Tex, Account No, 09 -4637 -8815. 8. Approval to award the Btiwauda I and 1I Street 16 Rehabilitation Improvement Project in the vicinity of Pecan Avenue and Catalpa Street to Laird Construction Company, Incorporated, for the amount of $165,992.86 to be funded from Can I", Account No. 09 -4637 -8702 and 09- 4637 -8703. 9. Approval to execute contract (00 88 -152) for the 18 Replacement of White Alder Trees (Tract 11934) Improvement Project west of Victoria Park Lane awarded to Steven Schultz Company, Incorporated for the amount of $37,458 to be funded from Laudscape Naintecance District 2, Account No. 41 -4130 -8769 with a loan from Beautification Funds. 10. Approval of a Joint Park School Agreement (CO 88 -153) 19 between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Alta Lome School District for Victoria Groves Park. 11. Approval to execute Agreement (CO 88 -154) for 22 Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Irene Horvath and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements along the southeast cornet property at Amethyst Street and 19th Street for the Amethyst at 19th Street Reconstruction Project. L_ �rvfn4 w � City Couw.il Agenda Septesbar 21" 1988 PAGE RESOLUTION N0. 88 -555 23, A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THS AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVENSM AND DEDICATION FROM IRBHE"HORVATH FOR AMETHYST AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION AT NINETEENTH STREET 12. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and 24 II for the proposed street improvements ac the intersection of 19th Street and Haven Avenue and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor. DLSOLVrION NO. 88 -556 25 A R8.40LU1':COi OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CHVIROMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CJ'tg=ICAL EYEMID2ION FOR THE PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF 19TH STREET AND HAVEN AVENUE 13. Approval to formalixe the current policy regarding 37 release of Building Occupancy and its Relationship to Completion of Related Public Improvements by adoption of Resolution. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -557 39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CITY ENGINEER'S POLICY REQUIRING COMPLZ:ION OF CONDITIONS Op APPROVAL AS A PREREQUISITN TO ENERGY CONNECTIONS 14. Approval of a Subordination Agreement (CO 88 -155) for 40 8797 Strang Lane, submitted by Milliaa and Penny McAlpine. City Council I PACE September 211988 4 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -558 I 42 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA� CAI.IPOBNIA, dPRRWffiC d 80806DINATION ACREENgyr PROM WILLIAM AND PENNY MCALPINB AND SIGN SIEINC THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERX TO SIGN SAME 15. Approval of Nap# execution of Improvement AgreemnG 43 and Improvement Security, std Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Struat Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract, 13)48, 13657 and 13858, located at the southvost corner of Baock nyan and So Street ns. and Milliken Avenue, submitted by N.J. Br IRESOLUTION N0. 88 -559 45 CITY OF RANCHO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE I IPPROVING EBPPEOVE MIN �ACREBMENTS, I TRACY NOS. 13748, 13857 AND 1�g g OP RESOLUTION NO. 88 -560 46 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IRS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TIM ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A I- ANDSCAPE /LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858 16. Approval t.ecuricu to Improvement Agreement and Land seeps Mfaintenanee�Dfs District No. n3 the Annexation to Maintenance District Nos. 1 end 6 and street Lighting 04 the wet aide of Lucas for DR ouch located Street, submitted b F a J Ranch Read, a Sixth mes 8. and Jerald B. - Laird. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -561 A RESOLUTION OF THE C CalNCIL OF THE CALIFOFO TH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHITY ONGA, APPROvINO ImpROvamEmr AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 87 -28 49 50 5;. f' Cit; Council Agenda r: September 21, 1988 PAGE``• 5-• 51 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -562 e• A RESOLUTION 07 1rM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERIEC THE ANNI AT1ON OF CERTAIN TERRITORY To A LANDSCAPE /LIGHTING i{AIATENANCE DISTRILT FOR DR 87 -28 17. Approval to execute and 51 Improvement nd Order:nenthe to trance S Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and 7traet Li6hting n Maintenance Dir�riet Nos. 1 and 6 for DR 87 -55, located on the east side of Rochester Avenue, north of the ATASY, submitted by Eighth and Rochester, A Limited Partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -563 55 A RESOLUTION OF Tdd CITY COUNCIL OF INS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIFG IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVEL02HENT REVIEW 00. S7 -55 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -564 56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LI GUYING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR DR 87 -55 18. Approval of Nap, execution of Improvement Agreement and 59 Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintamace District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract 13270, located on the northvesr corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Western Properties. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -565 60 A RESOLUTION OF THA CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IM7R0VENEHT SECURITY FOR TRACT NO. 13270 n_ VIM,p �a city Council Agenda y, r� September 21; 1988 PAGE " 6 >; RESOLUTION N0. 88 -366 61 " A RLSOLUTION'OP TDE CITY CGUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,! CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TUB ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13270 , 19. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreemamt and 64 Imp-oveoient,Secsrity, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract 13273, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain Vim Drive, submitted by Western Properties. RESOLUTION No. 88 -367- 65 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPW7VEMSNT AGREEMENT AND INPROVEHENT SECORLTY FOR TRACT 13273 RESOLUTION 90. 88 -368 66 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13273 20. Approval of Map, execution of Irprovemeut Agreesont and 69 Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 acd Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 85 -19, located on the southwest corner of Foothill boulevard and Ramona Avenue, submitted by Zen Ruby Construction. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -369 70 II A RESOLUTION OF THE CRY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 85 -19 •c City Council Agenda y �• September 21, 1988 PAGe 7 RESOLUTIOH N0. 88 -570 71 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERIEG THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TEVRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR CUP 85 -19 21. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 74 Parcel Map 9504 located on the northeast corer of Haven Avenue and Base Line goad, submitted by Base Line and Haven Center. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -571 75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EETBNSIOH AND WROVEMENT SECURITY F0: PARCEL NAP 9504 22. Approval to extents Improvement Agreement Extension for 76 Parcel Map 10771, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue teat of Chaffey College, submitted by Grigsby Development. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -572 77 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING rO'ROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY rOR PARCEL NAP 10771 23. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 78 Tract 12650 -3, located on toe east side of Haven Avenue, oerth of Hillside Road, submitted by Deer Creek Company. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -573 79 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12650- 3 PAGE! ' City Council Agenda September 210 1988 8 i '' 24. Approval to execute Improvemnut Agreement Extension for 80 r Tracts 12671 -1, 12671 -2, 12671 -3 and 12671 -4, l ,)cated on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain view Drive, submitted by Levis Homes. =SOLUTION NO. 88 -574 81 A RESOLUTION OP TER CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY CP RANCHO CUCAMOUCA, CALIFORNIA, ' APPROVING IMPR0VSWNT,tGRIE29:8T EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SRCURITT 701 TRACTS 12671 -1, 12671 -2, 12671 -3 AND 12671 -4 25. Lpproval of Hap, execution of Agreement (CO 88 -156) for 82 Poatponamut of Recordation of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, sod Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract 13248, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues, submitted by H 6 S Capital Enterprises. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -575 83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 186 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AND AGOSBHENI FOR POSTPONEMENT OF RECORDATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND TIM NAP OP TRACT NO. .3248 RESOLUTIOU NO. 88 -576 84 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 01 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERIUG THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13248 City Council Agenda September 21, 1988 PACE lALt, h i♦ 26. Approval to accept improvements, r -lessa of bonds and file a notice of completion fort Parcel Nap 8842, Parcel. 2. located on iarra Vista 87 Parkway, east of Spruce AV cua Faithful Perfornwinee sand (Street) $ 52,000 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -577 88 A RESOLUTION OF 280 CITY COUNCIL OF SHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPT3310 SHE '! UBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL NAP 8642, PARCEL. 2 AND AUTHORIZING THE OILING Op A NOTICE OF CCMPLETION FOR TEE WORK DR 86 -26 Yhase II (PH-102371, located 0" the north aide 89 of Jersey 8.alev.rd between Dtica Avawe and Vitcen_t Averue Faithful Performance Boad (Street) 9195,000 RBSOLUIIOU HO. 88- 578 90 A RESOLUTION OF TFF. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALtFORSIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVZMeNYS FOR DR 86 -26 PHASE II (PH- 10237) AND AU!BORIZINO THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF CONPLTTIOH FOR i TER NORI. Tract No. 12772 -2. located on this oust side of Ramona 91 Avenue betw6Ae Bate Line Road and �Turch Street Rcleaset Yaithful Performance Bond (Street) 0 60,000 Acce to Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 6,000 lALt, h i♦ ' PAG* a City Council Agenda '^ Fez m y9t September 21; 1988 ' 10 `F ; - RESOLUTION NO. 88 -579 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'LHB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NO. 12772 -2 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF- COMPLETION 1OR,THB WORX Tract No. 12772, located on the east a ?de of Rename 93 Avonne between Base Line Road and Church Street Releases Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $300,000 Accents Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 30,000 RESOLUTION BO. 88 -580 9d A RESOLUTIOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT NOS. 12772 GND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Tract No. 12835, located on the east side of Vineyard 95 Avenue north of Arrow Highway Releases Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 83,000 Accepts Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 8,300 ABSOLUTION NO. 88 -581 96 A RESOLUTION OF TIM CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12835 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK ,r City Council Agenda �y9 t' September 21, 1988 PAGE ll •'•;;` 27. Approval to accept improvements, release• Maintenance 97 Guarantee Bond foi Tract 11350, located on the nirthwest corner of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avanue. Releasaf Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 31,000 Maintenance Cuarantee Bond (Straat) 9 3,000 2C. Approval to accept the Archibald Realignment Project, 98 between 19th Street and Highland Avenue, Contract No. 87 -142 as complete, release hands and anthorise the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $345,883.46. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -582 99 A RESOLUrIOS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC INPROVEMENTS FOR ARCRTBALD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CONTBACr 40. 87 -142 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOE THE VORE 29. Approval to accept the improvements of Archibald Avenue 100 at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing 08- SBd- O -RCuc- RRS- RO78(2) as complate, release bonds and authorise the City Engiaeer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $116,739.44. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -583 101 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE IMPROVE'TNr OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CROSSING AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING Of A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE MORE M R Jl �� _ •tip PAGE .` City Council Agenda September 21, 1988 ff30. 12 A ?proval to change from the American Trust /Rubell Haim 102 i• Nadicel Insurance Plan to the Principal Financial Group Medical Insurance Plan. 31. Approval to destroy records and documents from the •F w, Administration Department and Planning Division which are no longer needed. vH, ' RESOLUTION NO. 88 -584 103 r A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCUNCII. OF THE }z. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCL, CALIFORNIA, �5 AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIF2D AS PROVIDED TINDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 7 D. COKSENT ORDINAXCRS The following Ordinances have had pvblie bearings at the tine of first reading. Second readings era expected to be routine and uoreo¢troversisl. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clark will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. 1. CONSIDERATION TO AUTHCRIZE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACY CO 188) HErMN TEE CITYCOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA ARD TRB BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIOH OF THE CALIFOeNIA PUBLIC F,r_'+LOYEn6 RETIREMENT BYSTHM PHPH TO PROVIDE TBH :n: RD LEVEL OF SURVIVORS BENEFIT COVHRAGE. ORDINANCE 90. 374 (second reading) 106 AN ORDINANCE Of THE CITY CGU„'CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONIBACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE C.ALIFOCNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM 2. CONSIDERATION TO MODIFY CHAPTER 10.56 OF THE CITY CODE TO ALLOW TUB HBTABLIBHNHNT OF TRUCE BOOTHS AND RHSYRICYIONS ON CERYAIN CITY STREETS. AS DESCRIBED IN J THE PROP05ED ORDINANCE. i ! Q VU„ °.a a r' PAGE City Council Agenda Snpterber 21, 1988 13 ORDINANCE 90. 373 (second reading) I 109 AN ORDINANCE'OF TEN CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ,RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING CHAPTER 10.56 Of TITLE a0 OF THE P.ANCW- CUC'AMOHr1 MUNICIPAL CODE, TO PROVIDE, 1102 THE DESIGNATION OF TRUCK ROUTES,, RESTRICTED TRUCK ROUTES, COMflRCYAL''AND CERTAIN OTHER VEDICLES PROHIBITED FROH USING. CERTAIN CITY STREETS, AND DESIGNATION OP TERMINAL ACCESS ROUTES FOR EIIRA -LARGE TRUCES R. AMRTMD PUBLIC BEARINGS The following items have bass advertised andfor posted as public haatiege an required by law. The chair will open the meeting to receiv., public testimtay. 1. ENVIRONMENfAL'ASSESSHRE AND SIGN ORDINANCE ANEND}PNT 114 6868 -01 - CITY oP RAlICEO CUCAMOHCA - Various amendments to the Sign Or AEM regarding neon signs and window I signs. (Continued from August 17, 1988 seating) Request that item be continued to October 19, 1988. ORDINANCE NO. 358 (first reading) 119 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE A&MDMENr 88 -02, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF T.M RANCHO CUCMHGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR NEON AND WINDOW SIGNS AND ADDING PROVISION FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS FOR CITY SPONSORED SPECIAL EVENTS 2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPIMUT CODS ANEBDM@Nr 125 58 -05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Chapter 17.18, Hillside Residential, Scction 17.18.040 E.2(c) regarding development within toe Algriec- Priolo Special Studies Zoom. City Council Agenda September 21, 1988 ORDINANCE 10. 375 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF TO CITY COUTCTL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ANENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.18 07 THE RANCHO CUCAHOMGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE ALQUIST- PRIOLO SPECIAL STUDIES ZONE F. PC To HEARINCS The following items have no legal publication or Posting requirements. The Chair will open the "eating to reeaive Public testimony. 1. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -585 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 07 THE CITY 07 RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTBUCTION OF PUBLIC IMWSOVEMEHIS ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10323 19TH STREET AND THE PROPERTY LOCATED SETWERN 10301 AND 10323 19TH STREET, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HIGBWAYS SECTION 5870 TURD 5880 MOBS CoNHOHLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF IN@ROVSNEWT ACT OF 1911 C. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any pcblie testi"ony, although the Chair "ay open the meting for public input. , Y PAGE 14 131 132 134 r- • I .. •, t City Council-Agenda .. September 21, 1988 15 1. RECONSIDERATION OF;PROPO3ED DRIVE APPROACH AT 8362 138 HILLSIDE ROAD BIIBMTTLD BY NHS. CHERYL RANT Z. Continued from September 7, 1988 meting 2. REPORT FROMi CUCAMONCA-COUNIY WATER DISTRICT ON WALTER PRESSURE PROBLEMS SOUTH OF HILLSIDE IN THE VICINITY OF 8APP8IRE. Coutinued from August 17, 1988 meeting TO BE CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 5, 1988 AT THE REQRBST OF CUCAMOffG& COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 3. REPORT ON NAIHrENANCE COST POR WINDROW TREES /POTENTIAL 139 THEE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE REVISIONS - Staff will present a report on the cost of maintaining vindrov trees. (Continued from August 17, 1988 meeting) 4. A PROPOSAL TO DESICNA7E TSB BITE OF THE HAVEN AVENUE 142 BEAUTIFICATION'PROJECT. LOCATED IN YHE HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN ISLANDS BETWEEN FOOTHILL AND 10.SON AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -586 154 A RESOLUTION OF TUB CITY COUNCIL OP THE 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE SITE OF THE HAVEN AVENUE BPAUTIFICATIOU PROJECT, LCCATED IN THE MEDIAN ISLANDS BETWEEN FOOTHILL AND WILSON AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST 5. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE RELPH HOUSE. 9468 LOMITA A 156 LANDMARK. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -581 164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE RELPH HOUSE, LOCATED AT 9468 LOMITA AVENUE AS A LANDMARK 6. MST021C LANDNARX DESIGNATION OP 7165 ETIWMDA AVENUE- APR 227- 131 -23. ( COntinued from August 3, 1988 meeting) 166 I City Council Agenda PAGE III September 21-, 1988 16 - ABSOLUTION N0. 88-406 188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THB CITY OF RMCHO CVCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING rdSSIGNATION or THE MEER ROUSE LOCATED 11 7165 ETIVANDA AVENUE AS A LANDNARt 7. CONSIDERATION OF A REVISED TRAFFIC SIGNAL ILLUMINATED 190 575567 NAME SIGN FACE DESIGN, H. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following its" bate been requested by the City Vauncil for diacussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair my opan the mating for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO CREATE A TASK FORCE TO ASSESS LOYC T--RN 192A SPOsr& FACILITIES NEEDS. Coutinued rron September 7, 1988 mating 2. DBBICNATIOII Op VOTING DELEGATE FOt LEAGUE AHNUAL 193 CONFERENCE. First discussed on August 17, 1988 3. CONSIDERATIOA TO CHANCE DESIGN OF CENTRAL PARK (1CIA7), 4. 1EPORr ON THE REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE 195 HO U18S . 5. REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES AT LAB0R CAHP ON ARRON HIGHWAY EAST OF VINEYARD (MIGHT). I. IDNNFIFICATIO19 OF IYP.I, FOR KM 1MYING This is the time for City Council to identify the itess they wish to discues at the nett Heetiug. These items will not be discussed at this seating, only identified for the next Heating. �.yqr�• City Council Agenda '�', September 21; 1988 17 J. CDlVMCASf068 7t0a1 THE PUBLIC - ! r This Is the tim and place for the general public to address '} the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from t addressing any issm cut previously included on the Agenda. ' She City Council my receive testimony and set the Batter for a subsequent meting. Comments are to be limited to five u1natas per individual. L AWGUF10EM 1, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clark of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda vas posted on September 16, 1988, ■eventy- tvo (72) hours prior to the meeting per A.B. 2674 at 9320 -C Base Line Road. ' 7 September 7, 1988 CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. GALL TO 02DER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga mat on Wednesday, September 7, 19889 in the Lions Park Community Centers 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting we called to order at 7930 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Pamela Wright. Present were Councilmembers9 Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey Ring, and Mayor Pro Tem Wright. Also present were: City Managers Lauren W. Dtnsserman; City Clark, Beverly A. Authelet; Deputy City Attorneys Andrew Areayneki; Assistant City Manager, Jack Lam; City Planners Brad Bulleri City Engineer, Russell Maguire; Finance Manager, Elisabeth Stoddard; Senior Planners Larry Henderson; Associate Planner, Arlene Banks; Assistant Planner, Chris Wastmem; and Senior Civil Engineers Paul Pougeau. Absent were Couneilmemberst Deborah B. Brown (who was attending a conference in Boston, Massachusetts) and Mayor Stout (who was boors sick). a a s a a Is B. ARROUSMaMYB/PRE.S®PPATION9 Bl. Presentation of ten year service pin to Jerry Grant, Building Official; and Jim Schroeder, Building Inspector Supervisor, B2. Lauren Wasserman, City Manager, announced the meeting was to adjourned to a closed session regarding a historical preservation issue and a personnel issue: B3. Lauren Wasserman, City Managers announced that Items G1 and G2 should be continued to September 21, 1938, a s s a s a C. CONSENT CALENDAR C1 Approval of Minutest August 3, 1988 se City Couae 1'Ninutes 3t, September 7, 1988 Page 2 C2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 8/17/88, 8/24/88, and 8131/88, and Payroll ending 8/14/88 and 8/28188 for the total amount of $1,967,060.95.. C3. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of 8/31/88. C4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale General geeing Place, Popper's Mexican Cantina, NBA Services, Inc., 9740 19th Street. tC5. Approval to adopt the Canu Appropriation Limit Resolution as recomputed by the audit firm of Lance, Boll 6 Lunghard from the base year 1978 -79 to the present. (0401 -00 APPRO LIM) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -519 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RE- ESTABLISHING THE BASE YEAR APPROPRIATION LIMIT AND EVERY FISCAL YEAR THEREAFTER, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE CONSTITUTION C6. Approval of final 1987 -88 budgetary adjustments. (0205 -01 BUDGET) C7. Approval of budgetary adjustments for the Community Development Slack Grant Program, General and Special Revenue Funds for Fiscal Year 1988 -89. (0203 -04 CDBG) 08. Approval of tuition reimbursement of $900 per fiscal year. (0401 -00 FUND) C9. Approval of the acquisition of Engineering /Public Works/Maintenance Equipment and Vehicles for fiscal year 1988 -89. (0606 -01 EQUIP L /P) CIO. Approval to confirm John Mannerino for the appointment to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Board of Directors. (0701 -01 APOINT CF) C11. Approval to order the annexation of certain territory to special maintenance districts knove as Landscape Maintenance District No. Street Light Maintenance District No. 1, and Street Light Maintenance Distr -t No. 6 for Parcel Nap 11222, Tract No. 13722 and Tract No. 13825. (0401 -03 ST IT HD AND LNSCAPE MD) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -554 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ONCA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR PARCEL. MAP 11222 '��TL ' ]r: a,y) ,t .a A� T i t� T L City Council Minutes September 7, 1988 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -521 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEIATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT NO. 13722 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -522 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CL RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNUATIOM OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT R0. 13825 C12. Approval to reaffirm a City Council and Planning Commission decision mado on August 17, 1988, of an appeal for a proposed subdivision of 18.28 acres of land into 4 parcels located between 7th and 8th Streets east of Hellman Avnme- APH 209 - 171 -58 - Envirocmental Asaeasmnt and Tentative Parcel Map 10931 - Golden Nest Equity. (0701 -06 APPEAL) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -523 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10981, TO SUBDIVIDE 18.28 ACRES INTO 4 PARCELS IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, SUBAREA NO. 3, LOCATED BETWEEN 7TH AND 8TH STREET, EAST OF HELLMAN AVENUE - APH 209 - 171 -58 C13. Approval to release Agreement for Postponement of Covenants, Conditions and Restriction for Tract 134439 located at the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Victoria Park Lane. (1002 -09 CCSR) RESOLUTI04 NO. 88 -524 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING AN AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF CC&R'S FOR TRACT 13443 C14. Approval to award the "Construction of Traffic Signals and Safety Lighting at the Intersection of Highland Avenue and Archibald Avenue Improvement Project" to Hovey Electric, Inc., for the amount of $65,260.00 to be Funded from TDA /Article 8 - Account No. 12 -4637 -8824. (0601 -01 BID) C15 Approve: to award the City Corporation Yard Project Phase I, Base Bid "A" including Alternate 4 deduction to Lucky Construction, Company for the amount of $2,098,000, to be funded from Capital Reserve - Account No. 25 -4285 -7043. (0601- 01 BID) City Council Minutes , September 1, 1988 Page 4 C16. Approval to award the Tryon Street Sidewalks, wet of Archibald Improvement Project including Alternate "Ae, east side of Jadeite to B -1 Enterprise Corporation, for the amount of $279101.76, to be funded from Pedestrian Crants /Article 3 - Account No. 16 -4637 -8717. (0601 -01 BID) C17. Approval to ward the Via Carrillo Drive Improvement Project from Avenida Vejar to east of Sierra Nedra Avenue to Lairt Construction Company, Incorporated, for the amount of $175,114,71 to be fu.,ded from Grants C.D.B.C.- Account No. 28 -4333 -8704. (0601 -01 BID) CIE. Approval to ward the Hella= Avows Storm Drain Improvement Project from Monte Vista Street to the Southern Pacific Raitrotd and the Cucamonga Storm Drain to Steve Bubalo Construction Company for the amount of $1,188,225.25 to be funded from Drainage facilities Fund - Account Nc. 23- 4637 -8763. (0601 -01 BID) C19. Approval to execute Improvement Agracmrnt Extension for Tract 13342, located on the northeast corner of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street, submitted by First Nationwide 'Network Mortgage. (0502 -01 AGPJ01 EXTN) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -525 A ABSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13342 C20. Approval of Map, execution of improvement Agreement and Improvemeot Security and ordering the annexation to Landscape MAintenanee District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Non. 1 and 4 for Tract 13271, located at the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Levis Development Company. (1002 -09 MAP FINAL)(0602 -01 AGREE IMPR)(0401 -03 LNSCAPE NO AND ST IT MD) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -526 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEHSRr, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL HAP OF TRACT NO. 13271 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -527 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CMJ.IFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13271 C21. Approval of Hap, execution of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District Ito. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nov. 1 and 2 for Tract 12969, located at Arrow Routa and Edwin Street, submitted by Hagop and Vegia Kevork Yasedjisn. ■, City Council Hlrwtss;;L"e;',i September 7, "1988 v' .; Page RESOLUTION ND. 88 -528• A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY SNPICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 'APyB1'VTRG IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, i= VITAL NAP OF TRACT NO. 12969 RIISOLUTIOU 5). 88 -529 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY C0101CIL CF THE CITY 07 RANCHO CUW01CA, CALIFORNIA. (OMDHHLSG THY ANNEXATION OF CRRTAIM TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MLIM=%&HCS WOTRICT. FOR TRACT 12969 C22. Approval of Map, execution of Improvatuent Agreement and Improvement Security, and ordering the annexation to Lundsaape Maintenance Diatrict No. I and Street Lighting Maintenance Dlietrict 11cs. And 2 for Tract 13541, located north of Red Hill Country Club Drive, east od Vella Vista, on Sierra Vista Drive, submitted by Allmark Incorporated. (1002 -09 7418 FIMAL)(0602 -01 AGREE IHPR)(0401 -03 1NSCAP4 NO AND 8T IT MD) RESOLUTION HO. 88 -530 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPROVENE.YT AGREEMENT, IMPROWHSNr SECUBITYi AND FINAL NAP OF TRACT NO. 13541 RESOLUTION 90. 88 -531 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CHRUIN TERRITORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13541 C23. Approval to accept improvements, release bonds and fill a notice of completion fort (0602 -01 BOND REL)(0704 -18 NOT COHPLT) Parcel Nan 9646 - located on the northeast corner of Moonetonn Avenue and Hillside Road Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 13,000 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -532 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING TUB PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 9646 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE UDRR I City Council Minutes -•a September 7, 1988 ,t Page 6 x• y Tract 12914 — located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue - eeLtase: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $326,000 Accepts Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 32,600 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -533 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12914 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK C24. Approval to release each deposits in the total amount of $5,000 to Kaufman 6 Broad of Sautbern California, Inc. for Model Home Sales Trailers for Tracts 12937 -1 and 12935. (0602 -01 BOND REL) C25. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -121) for the Grove Avenue at Nth Street and Atchison, Topeka and Santa To Railroad Crossing Improvement Project awarded to Vance Corporation for the amount of $183,626.00 plus 10% contingency ($202,000.00) to be funded Ems System Development Fund, Account No, 22 -4637- 87511 F.A.U. Section 3, Account No. 17- 4637 -8776= and TDA Article 3 - Account No. 12 -4637 -8783. (0602 -01 CONTRACT) C26. Approval to execute Agreement for Inutallation of Public Improvement and Dedication (00 88 -122) between Arnold C. Febling, Jr. and Cleo J. Fehling, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Street frontage Improvements at 7539 Carnelian Street, located on the east aide of Camelian Street between Vivero Street and Base Line Road, for the Carnelian Beautification Project. (0602 -01 AGREE P /I) ABSOLUTION NO. 88 -534 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND DEDICATION FOR ARNOLD C. FENLING JR. AND CLEO J. FEELING, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME C27. Approval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 88 -142) and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for DS 86-46, located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Michael Pats and Cary H aaksma. (0602 -01 ACREZ 1100401-03 INSCAPE NO BY City Council Minutes IN, - September- 7, 1988 page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIM CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IM2ROVEHENr CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM MICHAEL PATZ AND GARY H. BRAAXSMA AND AVIBORIEING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME RESOLUTION NO. 88 -536 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMOIWA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TER ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERMORY TO A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR DR 86-46 C28. A- proval to execute a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (00 88 -143) from Donald L. Mahoney for a single family rroidence, located on the neat side of Crooked Creak Drive, south of Hillside Road. (0602 -01 ACRES I /L) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -537 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMORTd, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN &GREENEST FROM DONALD L. MAHONEY AND AVINORIZING THE MAYOR AND CrTY.CLSRK TO SIGN INS SAME C29. Approval to authorise the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the City-wide Concrete Repair Annual Maintenance Contract to be funded from Engineering /Maintenance Contract Services - Account No. 01- 4647 -6028. (0601 -01 BID) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -538 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C!TY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE " CITY -ME JANCRETE REPAIR CONTEACr", IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS C30. Approval to authorize the advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria) and Landscape Maintenance District Bo. 4 (Terra Viata)1 Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract to be funded from Landscape Maintenance District No, 2, Account No. 41 -0130 -6028 and Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 - Account No. 43 -4130 -6028. (0601 -01 BID) City Council-Minutes September Y, 1988 .. Page 8 RESOLUTION N0. 86 -539 yN A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THH CITY OF RANCHO AND SPECIFICATIONS ; 1.�• CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,, APPROVING PtAN3 "LANDSCAPE MAINtSMOCd DISTRICt N0. 2 AND LANDSCAPE ,T FOR THE ° MAINTENANCE DISTRICT HO. 41 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AUTHORIZING AND oI�RABCS CONTRJ Lr" IN SAID CITY AND TO RECEIVE BIDS ' DIRECTING THE CITY CLERI TO 'ETISZ to authorise the advertising o£ the "Notice lood Inviting Contro11 s1(various C31. Approval Haven Msdian islands and San Bernardino County Irrigation Maintenance Contract to be funded from -6028 (flood locations) Landscape and Account No. 01 -4647 District No'. 40 -0130 -6028, 46 -0130 -6028, E¢gi¢ "acing /Maintenance Contract Service District control) and Landscape Maintemnee (Seven Media¢a). (0601 -01 BID) and 43- 4130-602N • RESOLUTIOH N0. 88 -540 A RESOLUTION THE �I PLANS CITY 07 WORD CALIF RN APPROVING BAN BERNARDINO COUNTY "HAVEN 1¢DIAN ISLANDS AND MAINTENANCE FOR THNCA, FOR THE FLOOD CONTROL LANDSCAPE AUNIDHCR ZIH t.NDN DIDECCIHG TUB CONTRACT ", BIDS CITY CLERK .10 ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE to authorise the advertising of the "Notice lnvitiag Bid'" for the ° Maintenance Districc No. 1 C32. - pproval and General Fund Parkway (Various Landscape Haintamnee Distx itt No. Landscape (various l"&time City - vide). Landscape and District No. S (26th and Rarmosa)1 ineeriog /Wntemucs Landscape Maintenance Landscape rrigation Maintenance Contract, to be f¢nded iron Eng 4647 -6028 (General Fund Parkurys), Contract Service Account No. 01- District Mainten ance Uiserict o. 5 Maintenance 3 No.•42 -4130- ;,028flnd L de Cape District No. - Account No. 44- 4130 -6028. (0601 -01 BID) RESOLUTION P0. 88 -541 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCBO A RESOLUTION CAI.IF08NIA, APPROVING PLAl13 AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE "GENERAL FUND PAggNAY8,1� DISTRICT No. E3 AND DISTRICT N0. 11 NANcEAPfi DISTRICT LANDSCAPE AND LANDSCAPE HAINT6NANC6 DTSTBICT N0. Id SAID CITY AND IRRIGATION AUTHORIZING AND MAINTENANCE DIRECTING THEN CITY 1CIERg TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS 41: I E City Council Minutes September 7, 1988• Page 9 • oK C33. Set public hearing far October 5, 1938 - Approval to annex lotz 4 through 77 12 inclusive of Tract 8583, located on Monte Vista Court aitC of Eastwood Avenue .� and vest of 7allcun Avenue, to Landscape Maintenance District No. I. (0401 -03 t LNSCAPE MD) ` RESOLUTION U0. 88 -342 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Or TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OP TEE CITY ' ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNUXATION OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 12 INCLUSIVE OF TRACT 8583 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -543 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COURCLL Or THE CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO C34. Set public hearing for October 5, 1988 - Approval to annex Tracts 8369, 8805 and 0806 (Rochester Traets), located on the east side of Rochester Avenue between Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard, to Landscape Maintemneo District No. 1. (0401 -03 LNSCAPE MD) RESOLUTION NO. 88 -544 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY 31TGINEER'R REPORT FOR ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE nISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 88 -545 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOB.VIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER TUB AUNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT{ PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR SEARING OBJECTIONS IMRBTO C35 Set public hearing for October 5, 1988 - Modification to Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract 13367 - Quintessence Devolopment Ccmpany - Appeal of the Planning Commission decision requiring the payment of iu -lieu fees for future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along Hellman Avenue and Amethyst Avenue for a subdivision of 6.87 acres of land into 19 single family Dl. ENVIRORMNTAL ASSESSIX"T AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88 -06 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Title 17, Chapter 17.08, of the Rancho Cucaaumga Municipal Code establishing minimum required sizes for wlti- family dwellings. (0203 -03 DC ANO) ORDINANCE NO. 366 (second reading) ya i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING, TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.08, OF rYf TUB RANCHO COUMNGA MUNICIPAL CODS ESTABLISHING MINIMUM 1 REQUIRED SIZES FOR MULTI- PAMILY DWELLINGS D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT• AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -01t • SOBAA8A9 2 AND 3 -CITY OF eANC1E0 COCAMONCA - An amendment to the Industrial ttt IPacific Plan, expanding the boundaries of Subarea 3 (General Industrial) to include portions of the area on the south side of Arrow Routep between Hellman and Vineyaru, currently located in Subarea 2 (General Industrial). Modification of permitted and conditionally permitted uses may Plan be considered. (0203 -05 INDUS SP) ORDINANCE NO. 367 (second reading) AN ORDILIINCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMMSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -01 EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF SUBAREA 3 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) TO INCLUDE PORTIONS Of THE AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, BETWEEN EELLNAN AND VINEYARD, CURRENTLY LOCATED IN SUBAREA 2 (GEHEW.L INDJSTRIAL) D3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS hENT AND BTIYANDA BP8CL7IC PLAN AU�h'D'WNT 88 -01 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA - A requost co amend Figure 5 -18 of the Etivanda Specific Plan pertaining to Community Trails. (0203 -05 ETIN SP) � �i a� City council Minutes s September -7, 1988. -' '` .kit, Page 10 lots in the Lou Rreideutial Distric024s dwelling located • Is unita persters), west of the intersection of Anieth at Avenue aid Highland Avenue -,APH 20.1- 711 - 01,,02,'; % 03. : MOTION. Moved by King, seconded by 8uq %at to approve the consent calendar es ' submittaa. Notion carried 3 -0-2 (Brovu, i t*ut absent) A, e t• A e 0. CONSBNr ORDINANCES Dl. ENVIRORMNTAL ASSESSIX"T AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88 -06 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Title 17, Chapter 17.08, of the Rancho Cucaaumga Municipal Code establishing minimum required sizes for wlti- family dwellings. (0203 -03 DC ANO) ORDINANCE NO. 366 (second reading) ya i AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING, TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.08, OF rYf TUB RANCHO COUMNGA MUNICIPAL CODS ESTABLISHING MINIMUM 1 REQUIRED SIZES FOR MULTI- PAMILY DWELLINGS D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT• AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -01t • SOBAA8A9 2 AND 3 -CITY OF eANC1E0 COCAMONCA - An amendment to the Industrial ttt IPacific Plan, expanding the boundaries of Subarea 3 (General Industrial) to include portions of the area on the south side of Arrow Routep between Hellman and Vineyaru, currently located in Subarea 2 (General Industrial). Modification of permitted and conditionally permitted uses may Plan be considered. (0203 -05 INDUS SP) ORDINANCE NO. 367 (second reading) AN ORDILIINCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMMSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -01 EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF SUBAREA 3 (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) TO INCLUDE PORTIONS Of THE AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE, BETWEEN EELLNAN AND VINEYARD, CURRENTLY LOCATED IN SUBAREA 2 (GEHEW.L INDJSTRIAL) D3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS hENT AND BTIYANDA BP8CL7IC PLAN AU�h'D'WNT 88 -01 -CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA - A requost co amend Figure 5 -18 of the Etivanda Specific Plan pertaining to Community Trails. (0203 -05 ETIN SP) � �i a� City Council Minutes September 7, 19_3 i Page It ORDI MAN CB NO. 368 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETIHAHDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03, AMENDING FIGURE 5 -18 PERTAINING TO COHMUUITY TRAILS i D4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIV),NDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to eased the Etivacda Specific Plan to aatablish a consistent wall design and setback for East Avenue. (0203 -05 ET:W SP) ORDl MAN CC 90. 369 (second reading) AN ORDrbA -*Cr Ov THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVin ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAH AMENDMENT 88 -02, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A COUSISTERt WALL DESIGN AND SETBACK FOR LAST AVENUE D5. ..a reuccniaw env tea.. ur wnua, uuustwmw — A request to &mead the Ettrinda Specifte Plau ') to video Cherry Avenue from the intersection of 24th Street (Summit Avenue) to Interstate 15 from a Collector Street to a Secondary Arterial; and to designate as special design streets the above portion of Cherry Avenue, and the Loop Road; and (2) to &mead the trails sup to relocate a portion Of the equestrian trail to the north aide of 24th Street (Summit Avenue) and to dalate a portion along 24th Street between Cherry Avenue to the Eastern Boundary oC the City and to amend the bicycle trail on the south side of 24th Street from East Avenue to the eastern boundary of the City. (0203 -05 ETIW SP) ORDINANCE NO. 370 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND STIURNDA SPECIFIC PLAN AI¢NDN3NT 88 -01 TO WIDEN CHERRY AVENUE FROM 24TH STREET (SUMMIT AVENUE) TO INTERSTATE 15 FROM A COLLECTOR STREET TO A SECONDARY ARTERIAL AND TO DESIGNATE AS SPECIAL DESIGN STREETS THE ABOVE PORTION OF CHERRY AVENUE, AS WELL AS 24TH STREET BEYWESN THE LOOP EGAD AND CHERRY AVENUE, AND THE LOOP ROAD (EXHIBITS 1 AND 2)1 AND TO AMEND THE TRAILS MAP TO RELOCATE A PORTION OF THE EQUESTRIAN TRAIL TO THE NORTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET (SUMMIT AVENUE) AND TO DELETE A PORTION ALONG 24TH STREET BETWEEN CHERRY AVENUE AND THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE CITY AND TO EXTEND INS BICYCLE TRAIL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET FROM EAST AVENUE TO THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE CITY (EXHIBIT 3) r" s City Council'Minutes September 7, 1988 Page 12 D6. N ORDINANCE NO. 21-C (second reading) Al ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 5.04.150 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO BUSINESS LICENSES) LATE PAYMENT PRNA.YIES ' D7 wacutN The CITY - Adding Chapter 10.50 to Title 10 Of the Rancbo Cucamonga Municipal Code to provide for the establishment of permit parking districts as designated by City Council. (Continued from August 39 1988 maeting)(1163 -01 PR 6 TRAP) ORDINANCE NO. 39-C (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.50 TO TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROVIDE FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMIT PARKING DISTRICTS City Clerk Authelet read the titles Ordinance Numbers 366, 3679 368, 369, 3709 21-C and 39-C. Councilman Ling requested that number D7 MOTIONt Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to waive further reading of said ordinances, and to adopt said ordinances minus Ordinance 39-C. Motion carried 3 -0-2 (Browns Stout absent). r: aaaa Discussion of Item D7.: Councilman King stated he had voiced opposition at the_ last meeting regarding Item D7. He further emphasized that he did not feel it was necessary. The waiver of the fees was not appropriate. MOTION: loved by King, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 39-C. Motion carried 3 -0-2 (Brow, Stout absent). MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to adopt Ordinance No. 39-C. Motion carried by the following votet {'S V City Council Minutes t „g September 7, 1988 Page 13 •” �,, )x AYESt Buquet, Wright NOEBt King ABSRM: Brown, Stout item *♦ K. ADVHYTISKD PUBLIC HBARDMCd pr' Mayor Fro Test Wright opened the meeting for public bearing. There being no w; response, the public hearing was closed. f� ORDINANCE NO. 374 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO •� CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN ANEVOHEM TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALI7ORHIA �S PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM t City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 372. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by ring to vaive full reading of said Ordinance and set second reading for September 21, 1988. Notion carried 3 -0-2 (Brova, Stout absent). A, e er ee E2. COMMUNITY DEVELGPWI?r BLOCK GRAM (CDBC) GRANTEE PER70RHANCE REPORT, 1987- 88 FISCAL YEAR - Review of the use of Block Grant funds including the status of funded projects and achievement of local and federal goals. Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Senior Plainer. (0203 -04 CDBG) Mayor Pro Test Wright opened the meeting for public hearing. There being *no responso, the public hearing vas closed. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -546 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OP °MUCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE COMMUMTY DEVELOPMERT BLOCK GRAM PROGRAM GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT, 1987 -801 FISCAL YEAR .,r r .J G City Council Minutes September 1, 1988 Page 14 lATIONt Moved by King, seconded by Wright to approve Resolution No. 88 -546. `lotion carried 3 -0-2 (Brow, Stout absent). - G' E3. CONMINI!'Y_DSYBLOPNBNf BLOCK'CRAMT - REPROLRAIIXIDG OP gd0_non TN Inns"' RmRn (0203 -04 COBC) `- Mayor Pro Tom Wright opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. ,rYa: RESOLUTION NO. 88 -547 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CDOMCII. OF THE CIIY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RHPRDCRAiOMG AVAILABLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMBNr BLOCK GRANT FUNDS TO NAKE STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO .�_ PERON BOULEVARD BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AND (ERMOSA (TURNER) AVENUES 't, MOTIONS Moved by Eiog, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution No. 88 -547. Motion carried 3 -0-2 (Brow, Stout absent). „ •seems K E4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE MODIFICATION OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD- , INTERSTATE 15 INTERCHANGE - It is recommended that a Negative Declaration be approved on the basis of the environmental solacement prepared for the proposed interchange modification. Staff report presented by Paul Rougeau, Sr. Civil Engineer. (1160 -01 FREEWAY) Mayor Pro Tem Wright opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -548 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ISSUANCE OF A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE I -1S /FOOTHILL BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to approve Resolution 80 -548. Motion carried 3 -0-2 (Brown, Stout absent). * s e e s Y Y N City Council Minutes September 7, 1988 Page 15 E5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BB -15 - DESIGN GUUUXUIva - An appeal of a Planing Commission decision to deny Development Review 88 -350 the development of a 1,700 square foot restaurant on .38 acres of land Within the Office /Professional District, located at the northwest comer of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APH 208- 811 -56. (1002 -08 DEV REV)(0701 -06 APPEAL) VARIANCE 87 -06 - DSSICN COOPERATIVE - An appeal of a Planning Commission deci3ioa to deny Variance 87 -06, a request' for reduetion in the average landscape and building setback for a 1,700 square foot restaurant on .38 acres of land within the Office /Professional District, lccoted at the northwest comer of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue - APR 208- 811 -58. Staff report presented by Chris Reaming Associate Planar. (1002 -02 VARIANCE) (0701--CG APPEAL) Mayor Pro Tom Wright opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council vast Michael Loosing of Pootanas representing Design Cooperative, stated he wanted some clarification and direction for this land, since it was obviously undesired. There being no further public response, the public hearing was closed. Councilman Buquet agreed that the site we a difficult one to work with. He stated that he did net agree with the Planning Commission regardiog the overflow parking. He objected to the sat -baeks and did not want to grant the appeal. Councilwoman Wright concurred. i; MOIIONt Moved by Buquet, ascended by Wright to deny the appeal without prejudice. Motion carried 3 -0-2 (Brown, Stout absent). err,srr P. PUBLIC BEARINGS Councilman Buquet asked if this was the way CALTOANS did this and we had to follow their procedure. Mr. Maguire responded yes. Mayor Pro iem Weight opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing council worst City Council Minn September 7, 1988 Page 16 Pete Amodt, 7471 Kirkwood Avenue, asked when the City would be starting the project. Mr. Maguire stated this part of the program was to break ground before July 1989. Mr. Amodt also asked if the trees which needed to be cut could be claimed by the resident. Mr. Maguire responded that they would be able to negotiate this with CALTRANS at the neighborhood meetings. Vera Ornellis asked if the City was going to be responsible for thb whole project, so that if something happened, they would be able to eome directly to the City, or would they have to go to CALTRANS.4- Mr. Maguire responded that the pavement roadway, etc., would be the responsibility of CALTRANS. The sidevalks, curbs, gutters, etc., would be the_ responsibility of the City through a contract with CALTRANS. < There being no further public response, Mayor Pro Tem Wright closed the public hearing. Councilmen Buquet inquired if we could send an infocmatiooal newsletter to everyone on 19th Street to inform them of thin spacial process. V RESOLUTION NO. 88 -549 ?- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PROPERTIES FRONTING 19TH STREET BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AND CARTILLA AVENUE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH TIM CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS AND HIGHWAYS SECTION 5870 THRU ° 5880 MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 NOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to approve Resolution 88 -549. Notion carried 3 -0-2 (Brow, Stout absent). * a * t * * F2. report Mayor Pro Teo Wright opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. ORDINANCE N0. 373 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF TUe CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING CHAPTER 10.56 OF TITLE 10 b` City Council Minutes September 7, 1988 Page 17 OF THS RANCUO CUCAMONG MOHICIPAL CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR THE DESIGNATION OF TRUCE ROUTES, RESTRICTED TRUCK ROUTES, COHMRCIAL AND CERTAIN OTHER VEHICLES PROHIBITED FROM USING CERTAIN CITY STREETS, AND DESIGNATION OF T92KUQL ACCESS ROUTES FUR EX M -L1RCS TRUCES " HDTIONt Moved by Ling, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance No. 373 and set second reading for September 219 1988. Notion carried 3-0 -2 (Brown, Stout absent). f f f f f f C. CITY 11►RAC K118 STAFF REPORTS Cl. RECONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED DRIVE APPROACH AT 8362 HILLSIDE ROAD SUBMITTED BY MRS. CHERYL BANIRE2. Originally heard on July 6t 1988) Item was continued to September 21, 1988. f f f f f f C2. OONSIDERATION TO CREATE A TASK TORCH TO ASSESS LONG TERM SPORTS FACILITIES NEEDS. Item was continued to Septevber 21, 1988. G3. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE TOE THOMAS HOUSE. 7980 VINEYARD AVENUE. AS A LANDMARK - A small bungalow built and owed by the Thomas Family on a site proposed for an office building. (Continued from August 17, 1988 meeting.) Staff report was presented by Arlene Banks, Associate Planner. (1402 -06 HISTORY) Mr. Buller presented a letter for the record by Edward R. Combo., property over, 8010 Vineyard Avenue, dated September 7, 1988. Mayor Pro Tea Wright opened the meeting for the applicant to address Council. Edward Combo, property owner from Upland, emphasized that he vam't'agaiust the historical deeignation, but wanted to know what the City wanted from him. Councilman Buquet felt that this item should go back to the Historic Preservation Comission, since there was additional information available that had not been considered by the Commission. Mayor Pro Ten Wright closed the meting for public input. City Council Minutes September 7, 1988 Page 18 Mr. Buouat expressed that if the State felt there via something arebaeologically aigoificaut on that property, then they should come in and do the work. RESOLUTION N0. 88 -516 A RESOLUTIOH OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE, 7980 VINEYARD AVENUE AS A LANDMA X MOrION8 Moved by ling to deny Resolution No. 88 -516. Notion failed for lack of second. Councilman Buquet emphasised again that he felt the item should go back to the Historical Preservation Comilsion. MOrIONI loved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to refer back to the Historical Preservation Commission with a status report to be brought back to the City Council. Motion carried 3 -0-2 (Brow, Stout absent). e e a e e r G4. ANNEXATION 88 -04 - AHMANSON DEVELOPMENTS. INC. - A request to approve a statement of intention to &max a 54 acre portion of the San Bernardino County unincorporated area located at the southwest corner of Stivands Avenue and 25th Street - APN 225 -082 -01. Staff report pressured by Larry Headerson, Senior Planner. (0102 -02 ANNEXATION) Mayor Pro Tem Wright opened the meeting for public input. Addretaing Council vast Harold Leisman, 2361 Campus Drive, Irvine, representing Ahmanson Development, stated they were propoaing two and a half units per acre, while staff was recommending two and a quarter. He did not feel that Choy would have any problems in working with staff on this. There being no further public input, Mayor Pro Tam Wright closed the public hearing. RESOLUTION 110. 88 -550 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAPJMGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO PURSUE A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO UNDERTAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEZATION OF PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND 25TH STREET City Council Minutes September 7, 1988 Page 19 MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to approve the annexation and Resolution no. AE -550. Notion carried 3 -0-2 (Brow, Stout absent). rrrrrr C5. TAI REVENMAI EXCUANCB POR ANNEXATION PROCESDINCS1 (0701 -02 AnEIATIOH) (0401 -00 REV TAI A. ANNEXATION 88 -01 - PULSAR DEVELOPMENT - A request to approve the Tax Revenue Exchange for annexation proceedings (LAFC 2503) between the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga fu approximately $1.47 acres of land located north of Highland Avenue, south of Summit Avenue extension, east of Dear Creak utility corridor, and west of the County /City boundary - AIN 225 -161- 19, 32 -38, 49, 53, 55, and 61. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -551 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAI RSVEHUES TO BE EXCHANGED BETWEEN AND AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDHGA RESULTING FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL CHANCE DESCRIBED BY LAPC NO. 2503 B. ANNEXATION 88 -02 - TERRANCE hIMCHVR - A request to approve the Tax Revenue Exchange for annexation proceedings LAFC 2504) betveen the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approximately 96 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Btivanda Avenue and 24th Street - APN 226- 071-05. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -552 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE "WHY Of PROPERTY 'lick RSVEHUES TO BE EXCHANGED BITVMH AND AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYONCA RESULTING FROM THE JURISDICTIONAL CHANCE DESCRIBED BY LUC NO. 2.304 C. ANNEXATION 88 -03 - CARYN COMPANY: BTIWANDA HIGHLANDS - A request to approve the Tax Revenue Exchange for annexation procesdings LAIC 2505) betwon the County of ban Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for approximately 303 acres of land located at the northeast corner of 24th Street (Summit Avenue) and Wardmrn Bullock Road - APH 226 -082 -16, 24 -27. RESOLUTION NO. 88 -553 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TAI REVENUES TO BE EICHANGED BETWEEN AND AMONG THE COUNTY OF _ City Council Minutes September 7, 1988 Page 20 SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF RI.NCHO CUCAMONGA RESULTING IROF THE JURISDICTIORAL CHANGE DESCRIBED BY LAYC NO. 2505 i Staff report presented by Larry Henderson, Senior Planner. s Mayor Pro Ten Wright opened the abating for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing we closed. i HDTIONs Moved by Ring, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution Numbers 08- 551, 88 -552, and 88 -553. Motion carried 3 -0-2 (Brow, Stout absent). rtaaaa H. COUNCIL BUSINESS There was none. r taratr I. IDENTIFICATION or IYFJIS FOR RHYT X1=INC Councilman Buquat requested a status report be brought to Council on September JI 21 regarding the Red Hill Realignment Issue. a Councilman tang requested that consideration of design change for Central Park be on the September 21 agenda. raa►ar J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC There yore none. t a a a r a K. AWOURNMENt MOTIONS Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to adjourn. Motion carried 3 -0-2 (Brow, Stout absent). Meeting adjourned at 9s17 p.m. to a closed session regarding a historical preservation issue and a personnel issue. Respectfully submitted, Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk Approveds n h �r a SR 'i �r M" y li Y d { �1 W a L Q_ f i Q u< S u O a 6 v C a i 0 0 i P L N O P .9,t pOp ONOO w�PN°pO nOr00000 d•O p00PNOpO V000 N P •,N�ONrPa na+nM1OdN:^$OwNL1a00aNOOwOha O rf Onwan a frPlww nww= 1 1 N Pf M1r w N N 1 ry N ryaFaPOrNnfNal�oPpwN Of paraPOrNnYNaF °POrN OO�paO�00rwM rrrwwrNNN NNNNNNrynnnnnNnn/.n YYY ryaaJla Oaaaaa<aaaaaaaa aaCaaadWaaaadaaaaaad Nn'IN NNryNNNNNNM1NNNNryNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN M1NNNN 1M1 NYn L s $•a n ro t ara w W NQN Q r u u V y a OS°NV W „Jn ” Sd uxiiicJ 3 " �o3Y8 °uz Q NL1O{YWIONO< � 6 JQUQU 1• a Q �iW >WOL� O rFW<W�WW p .� N OpONNG s � o r � N 8 5 O O> ° ow W NL :�-a< n N8 834 O tZLO iWW`=t L WLC i #V:1[C2 O 3 WQNNOQ ^ a nYNYYNN o e ri -ePr rfno �i wo r 6V Q 0 5 N 2 SL os o {u z s:i>Ma °`Wi „NMsK IN�L QijW �rr.WJ :. boarW.�WOS: <W SQQQ<wCJ< p 061"M1 SN ti2�I.NyW n� {WJJFO WS220 {6{ iZ WyS O.IV JS.LS OOM�mLO {9r « �wUSVN ><QQrOW�LNQ iWY20< < QWrJWFr r .� <StilrLw V U.+.+JJNJryl 70 <WSJ <OS <t { { {6 {tN < {� «O�70V <OOONUU nPOYwa Nnaoaan «o {Y nnnnNanoo -- ^i'NPw-- VOawanY Nlnna°O iwr.Oww�-nf wrw P-^P ^ ^Pr ■ 1 OOaOOOnNO N nOOFOO A OaFaFO00rANFOd10.O C ONOPNPPNOPF •.PtlNOONONMp ^µ�YwY F`fNa00 • • O 41 CaaO «oYry «ry�NNryFny «PF'O P•.rOOar ryh$rNryOY•°iN i� orr «w Q .. w w •. ire w r a .. s� a a z i nrNahopowNnra aFOPO wrywYaahtlpowNnYtlaFOp Nn o � r^ rY.. rrNruaauaaraaaaaaaaaaaFNFr .nFFwFh$000 � FFhhhFh FIFF F1•F hFFhhhFFhF F1. FI�hhFFFFhFF (j 1; M1NNNN. a' INNNaryNNNHNNNNryryNryNNNNryNNryryryNM1NNryNNN O 1 wC LiiY : YW�K C W. iZ 1 WW TjFhN O '2 Shot « YQ_tl y 1 wwF Sw «,2 ,2°y Sa Y SW I( w YO Y Xt2 PO Q Q- < oWW=YWWW iJY.`h 1 <N O N to K2.• 6 Z Z.• {• 6 2 00 Jp00 Q' YLO hw i %hh z n NG aUN3 Y- UWNinU u 1 «YW6UtZt1 ON U ai Z Y $ OZUwp6fU i �s`hz LN OO Imo 3 QO > J i Y 4a ou 6yS U<GYWWyn {1YV Q 1W W anp. <tvH2<F S 2 >hiW { \]WOCOhW2 O < W OQ hA _J 6JMIjW N�1 1 OW L�uYQ prJOUWZZ O MJQI OW<:.Y$ ZIOSO�IVUO QI SN„ >NO °Fry�Y 1a F N « p > ,Ur.� W Sj KNh J30SW UWV0 4O4pO W«�w°iUU�KOJ of1 iW i.=..W JOLnSxi�irYJ 2u z «i.Q.iJ1 {OO�Q °L «<�MO «WWW aw�J azoYhJJ sWm« h < •aW eWON.,IN>o""'lu -- -iPUY.N.. <LLboi <O66IQ+ >« u =...a «N6JCPVWi2GrQi0 �; NNZY6Uw �t Oh SM i { Qu°i <OpQaVUJQG¢WripCa J4=,i.QiP YJVNMOSOi�OW <pSS OJLLOU 46 { <W6 >CY >YP�UWNUh w�AJ4aW��i <O <hVV «U n - u o s u � U • W pii p yy � p4 S Jye ox 02= W�=� =s vs n2 h i 3 4 z W3 .O. t E Vj N j 2VLVLQW T T J �i N OQ=� p p<ZFS h3 SL• 3-IYZL•Up Q W i Jo,Pa j, gQU4CU GJ ° d o -QW.Q 3G. 7 u «Q > m<<W h : w. o1{:= 690 0« 0h 6 6<=WW ¢ V4.WO Y s 4 s W W IJi yTC <JN Y 2 <JWWWO LL1.( <�gNSV JIfi O �F< /VhLJU h.nO IY pJhUWWSN06J1[YO hju� j{_p OQJJp{ 1 U3NVwUVY00S9<000OVOWW;O LIWi.L �LLOV wVVS2F 7�ij�M fi NNOOr Y.•I.hYO «•.O FtlFNnnry „�OnNryFhNwOwnNpOY00w 61 nO «naY00POOnaaNO�����.pp YNrONnNPNnrywFOry•. .. P 1 w nw•• a N�rw «w •. •Nih •Niwwww w•.r «.Fitip ,wwpryi� t s w < 6 < l t V_ 4 Q 3 � �S 6 N 9.9,.M... o:.: ..d. ......tiOfOPrgOdO Y.uee, aMq neriornri._aaoori oo•o..ris �o.�. on�.:nn a-t wf$d $a «P� oPN�owa «go °PO�In M1aS ^en�BN P +M1 ct wf w J• N M1nn O N N fNangp wN d•r d1`OPOMNNpfpNanOCPCO"'.N IIJ N dI�Ny O.M.yy ryNry I1f g NN40NPPPNPPPPPP00l SCilO�Sq�lq d�lggVqiYlOqPOY nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn OC NryNNNNIa•IN N NIaYN M1NNNryNNNN «ryNM1NryNrylaiM1ryNNNry «NNNN y Or.l W Osny Oww »n nOi =YM t wY M why .ni Q'jWNWM <.[QlYQ QQy 6tlw WL.QQLW YWII Q 6Z w.rQYl1 o.°.o »o°ryl "lo i°LOO ieo obi + `o ou"' 4.ii o DUOS =oa YWY�Y fL`6` YYYniY ♦J w L�YYR� 6�a`f Y U66lYi Wd �' Y1`+'CW29.Zi.w �= >OYNYOW OJ WSH wWlW nyi <� Owi O{ OSQ '1C° qW SL6YOf Onx .QJJ OtaK Y QN6 nN ♦ p2nQ Sw QS` 2 Y OOf <i. U.i O'WOOQp1�2.�q < <aW OWMLN F NNWUj WOWW ►.� N4\i.p J.y °6 C e�YNN i ` .{ Y {�.l....5 t! > + }cW�W W�q QOI 2.[ Pg. ttZ >Y W °Q ada n.�i �zow u4w - ,.+ WWW Ox L�2 UPWq�2 WYWO�°� W3YiOWNWSS wJ+ >owUO OnoW M w x »W /NYWWWMwO O an t q tJnHx Yp tNSiNiW yOt2W OYf Z°2 RN�sWU�Wii'L�QC4 �fn` o.°.. i °'UN�i »i <i »`V�Wl sn y W xaWgw X`.�WnuWwM i sX uNnWS. s. `` *��� » <QW�.z..o °p." ��aY �•<-a* a §��LZ�� i�zw °a J� L�r+..yy WEEiwwW J'pJ Q,N 2yVOJ pp N OV R O.iV�NNY6yO Nrj60wyYOMQP Q26<3 CzGn ::.O ( .9 x J 6 7 Y i tU N Yi Yn � WVM.Ni. U ' »u..�.io 4 J°.LnY JNO NJYW Ot Vw 4r.u`.W ryF tJ 4.y`.YOJ`�p2°N � WJ Vx4liJ p U< J n {yM JnNVJW 1 :2�tV WYJw U u4 1V.wwg2Q S.YL WYO Q.� i1» J22 f. <rJ <WSY <Y O 9WJ0= aou .NU uL aWi�`d» a sQ$nx�sizW '.W XI w +e$NQa � O J <UWJJOSVJJiOW 4H 4xuYWOW6NNw� :4 >J°M4 pnFG "NU.nnY N '" j��u+NLWnaOWY3<w 4aY< VyIj4 OX °N SiW = =6V°°WWiw� i•J y. t2 M_W°'LW. 0� 04y {w00 y �OU \l }y W..W{n 1�COUW W`I+Y 7461�W OInLNiL; i.Yi O�O.�(tC9N >a O W' 1 1 J6 JL. 0iYZ2ii00LI°°L6°°66pLY°°°Yi6Q4C � <� ^PdNRfNdddwf ►aNndfffowaaNgdf dPOgaO.n O °i FNNNB� »d =.Vd N�iOr»G�.n'.wN � yA+NP^i'Ornwwww�a�awawNn. ( .9 1 1 hnnoaPn YnfrFOODnhaf000npp�gomeoom •1 pooOFaanhanPnOOph ^n00000+ n f PfF ^nf of hFff nfO°NOPO 48O ^ ^fPyH ^ »OOaFPNaYnNPxDN000ap nhranaN! nn ana y°mPnNP.°Y i O QI Yf .°qAa { c D _ •1 a^rmPpaa4ag00oe�er of aaFmPp nNnf aah +`} o. eNen f +fffN�n °a a aaa °aNaaaa aaaaaaraaa ° mmmeemroammemem �� nNnnNNN.,N NryryryNryrya °r raaaaaaaaaaaaaa a NM1NNNNryNNNryryNNNNN 1 N CCW`m « 1 Y Q � OwL rW_W _W yQ�a f nQ { Opn «1Qy p Q ay= S i Y YIQS FW ^O 0 PF < «10� wYY Y`Y Wu�.FY y • °NYC � PYM JO �` FPN¢ � .• •° L, J O• •y.1YN MW {N � O. �• !6 `mF 1 oVN S - .O ryry�'< `VA <YN264 .W(/a QYN °•1 m z >�SWm�� �° ^ N N t� LONLp`W�w�WNWZ<O< UuN11 _WnlWlgyypyy N TFtiiQ afWVNx }WLQ� N_,r6i ° `x N�HG�2Y < 1<YWN >Yr<Q{<IUS •}ta >,°i, Q"'. }Y•�h@ rl SuKi:i� °os.¢ti��a bs>,Wn` >.Y.,.P•"oa s�°dW: Q..JWi5Q•'zxn.°, i 88Ey i u Y� N + a Y S' °Ny °G•• � 4 VR I N DyNV=2rrF° f D_ J r t Y Yl J O 1 NZ « 1 3' %Kw• W _ O U UQir V.• ui r.¢i ° 1 i Yu°mYUJyO.Oi ¢«NSh¢H. Q >SW¢C >}f 0.• r 1 ss p <W<SJj WaWWG°Wn6< 1 1W QQ Ni JpJ¢ WQpp 19 44fiJ N6`t2Y ip« � m'W � Noo°ItWt.,N S4 ii•i�}N+Ip zNNOp¢D LS _1 Wa=f u(o 1 Y+ SiJJ��O��iY1w�Nrr<1''JN y6K2FNy�QW a W 1 NNNy{Iw,W „°,N 2 FYyy PL� rOryYal�hhFPF1I`hNrPNmaNN•�Pmn Y••�YPI� 1 wPfPOrf Off°ryPa.l NaNnF°frfaPFnnhONFOh nw »nnngnW •mow P.°i.Fi � r �H ^waffNM nil hiLan IAAA� d? e }ix •. Gnu t i I , o ^nwe $8$C 4 i S °°'' =• YW '"' i."S �' Y�'SY�Yc sq .YWp'7^ ' Jgn3C ' '` °..`.� °: `.�^ `9,.`.99`• eYJ { � ao "Av cos oo ee _o�eoonoJN�eeuoo S'r" J �ii 'a JU OJ. or 4y�ewJUJJJ"' °JY JY it.2r`.,74Y :14 2 r Y 1 ii o ?_^ 1149 �� ° 4 sno 3 S 3 •pa:-�: J9 E <� 8cece9 Y.e as °VM�^V °fi^ o• z... P ` n . _nni0010w'�O`J ^O P�n'.•��•P ^��n� ^` �•n J /t ' k ,6 t 11 A {f I .t p4 J +y4 � c i 6 _ X" wv 53x.0'.: -- --------- -- ii�M1e... m- a.'+ a :.+- .S +.n= + °s +.eao`se <n.�e�:2oa J 1 I+ ! - r r �r :4 ^°L228.'.8805,.°,„ 332. `,.84 "o,S.^.8 ?:'oC:898ti822380 =3 .• nnn�Vc nnnn ..nnn��zr.r= =2!z 4 :- +ue�i2eo5w -o2^ ` o oo�6e o�jo -OJV Y SYV Y- �VUYf e�JY Y/ VJ -J�Y2= c i 6 _ X" wv 53x.0'.: -- --------- -- ii�M1e... m- a.'+ a :.+- .S +.n= + °s +.eao`se <n.�e�:2oa J 1 I+ ! W to / w �i�i�` �.ti��f.S K�i ^.1�Y��TC1..'.1 • = •! i_Pa .�fe �„4�Y��Jj. .1 •. - ••33Y � W .� A• 5n u �-1 `�tYe • 1: :e S�,S8�s58.^.58:5:8R:�58S5�F38H� :788x8::888 .o�n� +e �..H_M «..fir .�o_n «.w.«.�� «n «.•. 7 :279= ° :F i� «�Yi: 1" « "i°n.2 7 u.'o -. :5o5Y o 005 I.- 'Y 54.5 5 :4 a5 ............ UYY V3Ww 'V YUY VU6 �Yy _ 6 si. ..... . ..2. ... °b.:: g. SS •°.�.. � °_H�.��� «a «a°°.ay «fie., «,4 °G`G.r°.'lu3 °o� 7f i•o.°,�•`�`. �3 °.l.4 AT �. :5: °`Sar <C�. ^8�3.. 8r. .'.I s '°2:Y ,e.^. >•Y.�A.'"°'.�ao� ._.. st:x °OxoW Oca���Cw�3��a3.wM•�YL4.°iCV•i> " j Y `2i6L. 1 - °.'.x �`2�'S: :'�'".�y Yd7 _ :353`,°.•. •..'' •'�.s.."85°.�uo: s. �a:¢ a ._y.1s €a�= :z.....yaaaw.wwxxww.r s■ t� I v\ 0.y e^ a' Z M, a 4 4 a 4 i tl °�' ^f O.raM10a i1, OO. ^,.wnpp Y NfO n,Ow nnf nn$wOnOinan00/^O nn0_M1NO�M1iry a^Ogp°,n «n ^^n�O�aa$ +�$n ` irof$ «o ^`..L °LY ^M1. ^` ^moo °ff orM1M1.aa w ° �_ O; O~ tQm r OpiV 4.O: YYYs 3 « °ar1�'i ±e�35e�or .io8 ^� ��iY• °$�r Vyynrarfr .n ^ O Qi6 _ �y i_VU�w ^WOU.^ii iV W ^Vdn Oi i3 V.r. F�7tbo� °- tbioze S:I.,M1`s ^ >- Yiiso ^rai V n nr ro «Mrnn.nf oas «� nn n r Y:S:S;n_;S y +�:�3M1n i 1. .1 curi_r__. _ y,, ^ -SEP - AffU:AM ON 1OL AL=NCL1L' NYMM uv.9Nl 7r Lywr aT A%" 99rwiw GaAJ Tse�ta G91.f0114 W sNa.rum 1. UNRI p LKV4 lA IY! mm, - d salt Ganoral public haatfoa A,WcaboSw.]OU 0 e..wotic 4�y 191 417914 rws. w.rr. Tr W�49�44wf97a 99s 1. Lw,r 4rAwI.lfAww 4NNI9 p..9 1 Kilt" or AIIIcmm Tcw Ov,utd, N.Ytw0.w , us atOl, Yoal ae/atm4 Orob 4 YI LL/r L rmw OF TUMAtlglpl nx 11C- Iit9 hf.bl. 1430.00 1 44 l7 Pinto. NttT]i hrlleo CrJrgv SO.00 t Ur J p at" uaa • wla L Derr J 9wYYw -IAr. m.i sar N0 holtiM 91w1. O7Wau4. �m Cucciccot Imo so =rafm TY11Al �. M I.YrYe YVLLV Lw. TTfo J14w. N -]1WOl O.r llYatt iN L Apiy A4Awt M i9ar iY.a ]F -IMilw W Yr nw w..l tua hfo I. Ywf yp w MY\ Iwr1eM J • fJVyl 16 IM IYO nYr MopN wl YI M pvuWwf J M AkOmk l x \.'.% M�wrwprp M Aalf b w Ifa1MYYt M do 6rotiJ Aw 11. fq.M.'!fi -wYw M plw 1 Y IO w w Wafyl Mq 1d M Iwi M J IW a^ \��a IZ A9o4r Mn p) w wry wwa0w wgipM p MW 4,YW i.Mw b Aor. r 4Y .wi4yw. J o 4ww, W AI 4.Yt 4 a r.W w nwr w IwaY p M.:dY1td o+r M M FoifYnt J M AlaJr4 9nw.1. CwwYl Aa 11 STAN p GIDOO4A GworJ Pin lrfiurOlro D.w 1 /]1 /4O ^�_ �+. I wM. r..Y ,.� .M i+.. �. r.w.. r.v r ..0 Y .r.ra . � I Y wr...Y w r wr.• Mrf e,..Y YwM1 =.W Yrrr .ww.r1..,/rYY� +.wn.wY.....�Y Y. y. wr .IYr .I ti.M..V 14 SOON iferl 1• AHUGATION OT TUNOMO! s- i 11 sure p cAtnoe4A t...ry J_d!L.H1011[411!0 orJL3!!4v j M1/�rYr.�rY r..i, Y/,w YY.wV. Da NN WrW lrinr FA614w1 Fn DrFwlweal U.Ody Aft)" fYVM4 wpy �1{ Al.awi W. p COPIES AUIND _Jll11lm _�. 0 I.-ch ..s n�xw aw � yj�lKHl > B L%V Hide A While 9451 9455 9477 M94579465 67 9469 9473 HIDE A WHILE Located; Perry Center 9469 Foothill Blvd, Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Property is currently zoned; Commerical Zoning of adjacent property North: Commerical South: Residential low 2 -4 Du's AC East : Commerical West : Commerical APN0208- 261 -37 By Joe Torrez 07 SEPT 1988 i 1D 4'y:. -~. k`?; :a.4'�w'.:: :���.- ;f..u«'_'_ ..!�^•�`i __ � _ s =r,-r vtl.- �-.r�_.- r.�y�i�:. -a �4'_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t 7. STAFF REPORT Date: September 21, 1988 gftl' To: City Council and City Manager mm-JC From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Richard R. Cot&, Associate civil Engineer Subject: Approval of the Professional Services Agreement Amendment between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and ASL Consulting Engineers for the Church - Hermosa Storm Drain (CO #88 -084) RECOMMENDATION: It is hereby recommended that the City Council approve and execute the above subject Professional Services Agreement Amendment with ASL Consulting Engineers. BACKQWJW /ANALYSIS• The proposed amendment addresses corrections to errors in the subject Agreement as they relate to Exhibits called out, as well as clarification to the implementation of the JA,, reement Fees. Both the City Engineerfng Staff and Consultant are agreedkthat the Agreement Fees were executed on a `Not -to Exceed' basis. however, wording within the attachments originated by the Consultant and attached to said Agreement require clarification. All other stipulations and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged. Re /spect ity�sngmttted, R Attachment i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Shintu Bose, Sr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 5 (CO 85 -062) for the preparation of final construction plans and specifications for Day Creek Improvement project by Willdan Associates in the amount of 544,500.00 to bring the contract total to $670,283.00 to be paid from Day Creek Improvement fund (A/C 664637- 6028). The contract Change Order No. 5 in the amount of $44,500.00 is recommnded for approval and execution. This change order will increase the previously approved contract amount to $670,283. Background /Analysis After completion of Phase 1 and 2A of the Day Creek project, which will construct the system from Base Line Road to the debris dam at the canyon mouth, all existing construction funds for the Day Creek will be exhausted. The remaining portion of the channel system is nuw scheduled to be completed from the expected loan from the Federal Bureau of Reclamation. The timing and the amount of the loan money that may be received at anytime from the bureau are unknown. Due to these uncertainties, we are proposing to undertake a drainage study of the existing channel system at completion of Phase 1 and 2A to prioritize the phasing of the remaining portion of the overall project. The study will provide information regarding the functional capability of the interim channel system, identification of channel restrictions and will determine the phasing of the construction which will minimize the adverse effect on the downstream properties. This study work was not stipulated in the original scope of work of the contract for the consultant, requiring this change order. Respectful submitted, RHM. Attachment 1r.�' h c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA d ;�— STAFF REPORT Date: September 21, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakoshl, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval ,to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 07 -163) for a Professional Services Agreement with BSI Consultants to provide additional services in preparing strlping 'and signing plans, specifications, estimates for 19th` Street from Archibald to Hermosa and from Cartilla to Haven Avenue and redesig6 driveway at' APN 202- 191 -28 for the amount of $7,160.00 to' be funded from Systems Development Fund Account No. 22- 4637 -8744. RECOH EIORTIOM: It 1s recommended to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 87 -163) with 8SI Consultants to provide striping and signing plans for the 19th Street Project. BACK6ROIAD /ANALYSIS• The firm of BSI Consultants, Inc., was engaged in preparing plans, specifications and estimates for 19th Street from Hermosa to Cartilla. It 1s now found necessary to expand their contract to include striping and signing plans to match the new stripes from Hermosa to Archibald and from Cartilla to Haven. The Chanae Order is for the total amount of $7,160.00 to bring the contract total to $45,660.00 to be paid from Systems Development Funds. Res, a ly submitted, M i Attachment 13 Yr { W CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF -REPORT �.'` -1 ' f, p DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel, Lazo,'Jr., Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award the Ninth` Street Rehabilitation Improvement Project between. Vineyard Avenue and Baker Avenue to Gentry Brothers, Incorporated, for the amount of $109,388.65 to be funded;frow Gas Tax, Account No. 09- 1637 -8815. RECOI9ONTION: It is recommended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award the contract for Ninth Street Rehabilitation Improvement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Gentry Brothers, Incorporated for the amount of $109,388.65. Background /Analysis Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on September for the $109,388.65 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $120,200.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Resp tf submitted, R7M: Attachment cc: Purchasing 14 3 At �kq XY� k § � A f e § tR Ek12 is tj §$r j�! n �k �� . 1 r. CITY OF RANCHO CUC:.AMONGA -� STAFF REPORT Aclk �r DATE: September 21, 1988 Ito TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell It. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr.', Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award the Etiwands I and IT Street Rehabilitation Improvement Project in the vicinity of Pecan -Avenue and Catalpa Street, to Laird Construction Co., Inc., for the amount of $165,992.80, -to be funded from Gas Tax Account No. 09- 4637 -8702 and 09- 4637 -8703 It is recommended that the City Council accapt all bids as submitted and award the contract for Etiwanda I and II Street Rehabilitation Icprovement Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Laird Construction Co., Inc. for tho amount of $165,992.80. Background /Analysis Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on aaptember 8, 1988 for the subject project. Laird Construction Co., Inc. is the apparent lowest responsible bidder with a bid amount of $165,992.60 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $162,500.00. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds rll bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. Respet su�!,)tted, i RHM:JL:Jmb Attachment cc: Purchasing � � _ 3- ^ : z - « » >_ ! . , « � � _ ` � � � \ | � 2 ~2 \ � § - � . � . . ■ - % � � . ' I \a§ § . 9 , � - ƒ© 99 f - - & i� ° ! ` m ! S - , # k § E K � � � ; � � s kB�k §§■ m $ 2 .. _ § §� � � � � � _ ■§ kB§ � ! ® k ! K ) § § § � § . |.k ■ § m a k ƒ | � � .. - -- | | kk k§ §\ § § � E� § : e . -§ ; �! �� � � |B � - d) \ � . .. 77 - . i NOR . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, tM TO: City Council and City Manager �lJ( FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engfneor BT: Joel Lazo, Jr., Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Replacement of White Alder Treys (Tract 11934) ImpioveoenC Project West.of Victoria Park Lana awarded to Steven Schultz Co:, Inc. for the amount of S37,.38.09 to be fended from Landscape Maintenance District 2. &Count No. 414130 -8769 with a lean from Beautification Funds. RECOMMiDATION. It is recomended that City Council execute the contract documents for (Tract 11934) Improvement Project Services Director to expend $37,4 tbirtonance District 2, Account t Beautification Funds. Background /Analysis authorize tho Mayor and City Clerk to the Replacement of White Alder Trees and authorize the Admtntstrattve 58.00 to be funded from Landscape lo. 41- 4130 -8769 with a loan from On August 17, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Steven Schultz Co., Inc. Staff has received from Steven Schultz Co.. Inc., executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Respec �` t s bmitted, �� RHM:J :1��J� -� cc: Purchasing 5 of N Y, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT f��+a�� � y1I1Ic Date: September 21, 198E J? 19'7 To: Members of the City Council and City manager Prom: Joe Schultz, Community services Manager Subject: Agreement between City of Rancho Cucamonga and Alta Lova school District - use of Victoria Groves Park The City is essentially proposing a "no- charge" agreement for the use of the playground areas of the park. Ir. return, the City will have primary usage of the school for indoor recreation programming when the permanent school is completed. This might take several years. The attached stipulations have been approved by the governing board of the District. Article 8 has already taken effect. I recommend your approval of the stipulations and the joint park - school agreement as outlined. I have been working with Mr. Floyd stork, consultant for Alta Loma School District, regarding the attached "Stipulations ". This will allow the District exclusive use of Victoria Groves for their physical education program and recess facili.ies. The City in turn will have exclusive /primary usage of the Victoria Groves School, when completed, for after - school recreation programming for children, adult and senior citizen activities. This will alloy the Community Services Department to use a facility within an area that does not have indoor facility programming within close proximity to residential development. During the original discussion among the school District, City and the William Lyon Company a portion of the Lyon Companl Victoria development was to be reserved for a City park - school joint use area. The City park, Victoria Groves, was completed ahead of the school. a w g Joint Agreement between City of Rancho Cucamonga and Alta Loma School District September 21, 1988 Page Two ■ The Alta Loma School District will be in temporary facilities' for several years and only a small area within the quadrangle fo-mad by the classroom, is available for a play area. 'The District is heavily 'dependent on the City park for their physical education program and recaso facilities. At this time a complete mutual use agreement can .,-,t be implemented. Respectfully submitted, Jo Schultz cox ity So ices Manager JS:bs Attachment: Alta Lome School District Stipulations ` .�li t, STIPULATIONS 1. The City shall grant to the District exclusive use of the portion of the park from the eastern baaxLry of the Little League field to the common boundary of the _ park and school site for sehoot- related activities from 7:30 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. daily, weekends and school holidays excepted 2, The City shall cause to be Installed signege indicating the above usage, along the boundary of the exclusive use area. The sign material shall be fabricated - by the City at the Matrices expertm _, c 3. In the event that emergency maintenance and/or repairs are required to the aforementioned City facilities, that is, work necessary to ensure the protection of the facility and/or the safety of its users, the City reserves the right to close their respective facility from user access until the maintenance and/or repairs are completed. 4. The District shall protect the used facilities from damage, mistreatment, or misuse during the exclusive use period described in this agreement In tM event that facilities or equipment are damaged as a result of Its use, the cwt of repairs shall be bone by the District. S. The District agrees to hold harmless, Indemnify, and defend the City , Its elected officials, officers, agents, successors, and asslgw from and against all claims, liens, encumbrance, actions, loss, damages, causes of action, expense and/or liability, including court eats and attorney fees arising from or resulting from loss or damage to Prgterty or Injury to or death if persona resulting In any manner whatsoever directly or Indirectly by reason of the District's operation of the said Portion of the park fur their sole use. District shall provide Insurance coverage with respect to said Indemnity in amounts, form, and content approved by the Agency. Said coverage shall be maintained by the District at all times of use of said portion. District shall supply to the City certificates indicating the existence of said coverage prior to each school year. 6. The City agrees to maintain the exclusive use area In usable condition through regular watering, mowing, and other routine maintenance. 7 For the right to the exclusive use of the area described In this document, the District agrees to reimburse the City in the amount or one dollar ($1.00) per year, dl •3� s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: September 21, 19U To: City Council and City Ranager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approval of Agreement for installation of public improvement and dedication between Irene Horvath and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements along the southeast corner property at Amethyst Street and 19th Street for the Amethyst at 19th Street Reconstruction Project. Staff recommends the adoption of the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Public Improvement and Dedication between Irene Horvath and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street frontage improvements at 6705 Amethyst Street, in conjunction with tha Amethyst Street at 19th Street Reconstruction Project. 8ACR6RWID /ANALYSIS• Previous action before the City Council on June 1S, 1988, Resolution No. 88 -397, adopted and approved the Eminent Domain action to acquire public right -of -way at 6705 Amethyst Street, APX 202- 111 -06 for the construction of street improvements and story drain was initiated. Although implementation of the Improvement Act of 1911 has taken place, effort continued to locate the owner, Irene Horvath and negotiations to acquire such right -of -way was pursued to avoid further delays in constructing such improvements currently on hold due to missing right -of- way and permit -)recessing by Caltrans. Staff has at last contacted the o %aer and reached an agreement for exchange of right -of -way for City installed street improveemnts. Attached is the Ac reement for Council approval. The signing of the Agreement will make the right -of -way condemnation no longer required, and the previous order to construct and related court filings shall cease. Respj�t�Dlly submitted, �RHif:Jtihpam Attachment M 4; Q*92AT�Iwm T -W"-- TLC. !,RESOLUTION No. .555 A RESOLUTION OF4HE CITY COUNCIL bF,THE-6TV& .-RANCHO CUCAMW CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING THE AGREEMENT FOR,'INSTALUTION. OFi PUBLIC­ IMPROVLXMT� AHD' DEDICATION FRON,1RENE HORVATH-FOR AMETHYST- AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION ATXNETEENTH STREET' WHEREAS; t hj."Efty_& ncfl.-Of' the 6ty.oi.'Rj6ckO.Cti&a ngs.,has established requirements for-.*corfstruction of. fronta lop that shall be.most compatfbliwi . rovements n a* marner Private injury; and with the grtatei'st� puOfe�l 11 906d'and the least WHEREAS, the"w'id-e�1, Street ning of existing roadway section along 19th and Installation Of'cTrb,` gutter.,sidewalk, --street It t and'street pavement at 670S Amethyit Street,-,shall be made part of the Reconstruction at Nfnete*nth.Stre at Project; =thYst Street WHEREAS, Irene Horvath ha's agreed to dedicate right-of.way as a reimbursement to the city for said improvements. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. does resolve as follows: 1. Accept the Agreement for installation of Public Improvement and Dedication. 2. The implementation of Right-of-WaT, Condemnation per Resolution No. 88-397 and the imp Mntation Of Chapter 27 of Improvement Act of 1911 per Resolutf on No. 88-398, both doted June is, Igaa, shall cease and no longer be In effect. Council authorizes the Mayor and City clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office Of the County Recorder of San Gernardino, California. .=)3 Date: To: From: By: Subject: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1988 City Council and City Hanagor Russell H. Hagulre, City Engineer Henry Hurakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer Parts for proposed FStreet Improlvocentslattthhee.intersect /nr of 19th Str_ot and Haven Avenue and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor RECONENDATION: It is hereby recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study parts I and II for the proposed street ' mprovements at the intersection of 19th Street and Haven Avenue and issuance of a Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Envlrnimental quality Act. BACKG OtW /ANALYSIS• This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the proposed street improvements at the intersection of 19th Street and Haven Avenues. In conformance KIt4 the California Environmental Quality Act and State Guidelines, the attached doc=ent has been prepared to permit constru:tion of the above•mentionad improvements. Said improvements generally entail the sidewalk installments, wheelchair ramps, drainage improvements and street lights. It is the Engineering Staff's finding that tho proposed project will not create a significant adverso impact on the environment aid therefore - recommend that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exeopt. Respectf4TVy ss Daitted, Attachment J� RESOLUTION N0# 155(.0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONC•A, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONIENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EMMPTION FOR YHE PROPOSED STREET IHPROMENTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF 19TH STREET AND - HAVEN AVENUE 4 WHEREAS, the City founcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has reviewed all available input concerning the proposal 19th Street and Haven Avenue Street Improvements; and and WHEREAS, said improvemnts require an Environmental Assessment; - WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. NCH, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The City Council of the Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the nv rm E— i— wenfal Assessment Initial Study and issuance of a. Categorical Exemption for the proposed 19th Street and Haven Avenue Stret Improvements. r Section 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption pursuan Califnrnia Environmental Quality %ct. GEhERAL ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW APPLICATION INITIAL STUDY - PART I For all projects requiring environnental review, this form most be complel J -. dnd submitted to the Development Review Cmmntttee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Planning Division staff will prepare Part It of the Initial Study and make recommendations to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will make one of three determinations: (1) The project will have no sig9nificant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, t2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Immact Report will be prepared, or (3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. Date Filed: Project Title: Improveoant to the Intersection of 19th Street a Haven Avenue Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: city of Rancho Cucamonga Name, Address, Telephone of Person To Be Contacted Concerning this Project: Hr, Henry NLTakoshi, c/o City of Rancho Cucamonga, 9J20 Baseline Road, Rancho CuLamenga, Cal!fornaa 91730 714 -909 -1662. Location of Project: Intersection of 19th Street and Haven Avenue Assessor's Parcel No.: N/A List other permits necessary from local, regional, state and federal agencies and the agency issuing such permits: CALTRANS Eneroachme-it Permit J `0 PROJECT�ieN Proposed use or proposed project: fie project is to improve [he intarseetlon of 19th street and Haven Avenue. Acreage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings, if any: approximately one (1) acre, an to o the environmental setting of the pro ect site including lnfomoation on topography, so sta3ility. plants (trees), land animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, land use of surrounding properties, and the description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary sheets): Intersection of a major and a collector street in residential area. Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cunnllative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact_ —Y7 5 HILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change to ground contours? _ x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise of produce vibration or glare? X — _ 3. Create a substantial chan3e to demand for municipal services (police, fire. water, sewage, et c.)7 _ x 4. Create changes in the existing Zoning or G•neral Plan designations? _ X S. Remove any existing trees? Now many?_ _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as tcxic substances, flammables or explosives? _ X Explanation of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary): 1. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project will generate daily: 0 8 Estimate the number of auto and truck trips generated daily by this project:_ 0 9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) required for this project, In cubic yards: 500 c.y 10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning Division. Date:--'?- 149 Signature //'• /L..--wli.t-e"- Title AcASMehHvWPAgineer I i -- RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga ability Planning Division In order to aid the school district In assestin their accommodate the p proposed residential developmen Developers'are �Y required to secure letters from the school district for accommodating the Increased number of students prior to issuance of building permits. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.! N/A Specific Location of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction! 4. Earliest date of occupancy. Model# and ! of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Ranae d CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r PART II - INITIAL STUDY .._ ENVIR010ffitiAL CHECXLIS7 i APPLICANT: City of Rancho Cucamonga - FILING CATE: LOG NUMBER: Y uPROJECT: Street Improvements y PROJECT LOCATIONS lotereection of 19th Street and Haven Avenue ' I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanation of all "yea" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets) YES MAYBE NO 1 Soils and Geology. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in geologic relationships? __. X b Disruptions, displacementa, compaction or bur!al of the soil? X C Change In topography or ground surface contour intervals? X d The destruction, covaring or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? _. k e. Any potential increase in wind cr water erosion of soils, affecting either on or off site conditons? X I Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition? X g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or aimilar hazards? _ X h. An increace in the rate of extraction and /or use of any mineral resource? _ 7L 2. Hydrology. V111 the proposal have significant results in: ■ E a Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants ?_ _ _ X b. Reduction of jha numbars of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? s YES MAYBE NO . a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction of flowing stream, rivers, or ephemeral scream channels? x b Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? Y c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any body of water? X " e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality? f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics? _ x S. Charge in the quantity of groundwaters, either through direct additions or with- drawals, or through interference with an aquifer? Quality? Quantity? _ .E.. h The reducclon in the amount of water other- wise available for public water supplies? _ A- 1, Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or seiches? x 7 Air Quality. Will the proposal have significant results In: a Constant or periodic air evissions from mobile or indirect sauces?? x 1 Stationary sources? _— —_ x 1 b. Deterioration of ambient air quality and /or Interference with the attainment of applicable air quality standards? — x c. Alteration of kcal or regional climatic conditions, affecting air movement, moisture or temperature? _- 6 Biota Flora Vill the proposal have significant results In: a Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or number of any species of plants ?_ _ _ X b. Reduction of jha numbars of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? s C' t YES MAYBE Ito e. Introduction of new or disruptive species of plants into an areal _ L d. Reduction in the potential for agricultural production? __ X. Fours. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Change in the characteristics of species, including diversity, distribution, or numbers of any tpecies of animals? _ —_ i. S. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, race or endangered species of aniaals? c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? _ d. Dateaicration or removal of existing fish or wildlife habitat', — 2L S. Population. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri- bution, density, diversity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? b. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a aemand for additional housing? _ -, 6. Socio- Eco•mic Factors. Will the proposal have significant results int a Change in local or regional socio- economic characcetietice, including economic or commercial diversity, tax rate, and pcoperty values? _ X. b Will project costs be equitably distributed among project beneficiaries, i.e., buyers, tax payers or project users? 7 Land Use and Planning Considerations. Will the proposal have significant results in? a A substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? b A conflict with any designations, objectives, policies, or adopted plans of any governmental X entitles? .� --- — e. M Impact upon the qulaity or quantity of existing consumptive or non- ,.oisumptive recreational opportunities? -7t ;�.k. YES HAYBE No 8. Transportation. W111 the proposal have significant i results inS Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? X 'z b. Effects on existing streets, or demand for fli new street construction? _ X _ 3S i!> C. Effects on existing parking facilities. or 4 demand for new parking? X i;. d. Substantial impact upon existing transports - y;' Lion system? X a. Alterations to present patterns of circula- tion or moment of people and /or goods? X ee f. Alterations to or effects on present and .• potential water- borne, rail, mass transit or y air traffic? X g. Increases in traffic hazards to motor vehicles. bicyclists or pedestrians? X 9. Cultural Resources. 11111 the proposal have significant results in: a. A disturbance to the integrity of archaeological, palaoatological, and /or historical resources? X 10. Health, Safety. and Nuisance Factors. Will the F, proposal have eignificant results in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? X b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? _ X c A risk of explosion or release of haterdous substances in the event of an accident? _ d An increase in the number of individuals or species of vector or pathenogenic organisms or the exposure of people to such organiams? X e. Increase in existing noise levels? X f Exposure of people to potentially dangerous rolse levels? X g. The creation of objectionable odors? X h. An increase in light or glare? X v CYES MAYBE NO 11. Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant results in: a. The obstruction or degradation of any scenic vista or view? X b. The creation of an aesthetically offensive site? _X c. A conflict with the objective of designated it potential scenic corridors? -_ _X 12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal have a significant need for new systems, or alterations to the following: a. Electric power? _[ b. Natural or packaged gas? r_ ..Y c. Coccunications systems? �- d. Water supply? -L a. Wastewater facilities? _ ..2L f. Flood control structures? g _ g. Solid waste facilities? _- -L h. Fire protection? I. Polite protection? J Schools? -L k. Parka or other recreational facilities? 1 Maintenance of public facilities, including roads and flood control facilities? m. Other governmental services? -X- 13. Enemy and Scarce Resources Will the proposal have significant results in: a Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy? b Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy? X. c. An increase In the demand for development of new sources of energy? d. An increase or perpetuation of the consumption of non - renewable ferns of energy, when feasible renewable sources of am rgy are available? yV, _ ` YES lUYgi :10 4 e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or I scarce natural resource? IL 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance. tY� a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat u0ish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop z below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce Y , the number or restrict the range of a rare or `qj. endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the mwjor periods of p California history or prehistory? b. Does the have ect ro the p 7 potential to aehf�tve short -tern, to the disadvantage of long -tarn, `4 environmental goals? (A short -[arm Impact on the -' environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long- tam impacts will endure well into the future). x :r c. Does the project have impacts which are Individually limited, but cumulatively j considerable? (Cumulatively considerable means that the incremental effects of an °y individual project are considerable when viewed In connection with the effects of past projects, and probable future projects). _- A d. Does the project have environmental effects whirh will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? II. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMNTAL CYALVATION (i.e., of affirmative answers to ns p the above questiolus a dla:ussion of proposed mitigation measures). 12 a The project includes the installation of catch basins on the east aide of ft-ven Avenue at 19th Street and redirection of flows to the weer side, and the up- sizing of culvert, under 19th Street. Therefore alterations is existing flood control facilities will be required but the alterations will not present a substantial impact on any ocher existing flood control facilities. 3S , ;. �. -�»� +";-Slr+':'s" "�- °ty±i,,{'.�•C.'. ., °- ".fir = '•:•r:- Sww• =;: ., -�: DETERMINATION "•; "4 On the basis of this iiritial evaluaitan: .. 4 I find the proposed project COULD-Nor have a ignificant 6ffeet on the environment, and a NEGATIVE 1 DECLARATION wisll be prepared. O I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environmenit, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures have b described on .an attached sheet een added -to the project. DECLARATION WILL-BE A NEGATIVE PREPARED. ❑ I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on'thg environment, and an ENVIRONMENT IMPACT REPORT is required. XX Project CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT Article the e Proposed ��P( Cal iforn a nv rormental Qua- cyy6cT. Section 15301 of the Date 9- 8 —SS'- &ure __.._ /I(1-' PiATC aylt 7 NG�aYt/t_ to I �rD _ — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1928 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Monte Prescher, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Approval to Formalize the Current Policy regardingg release of Building Occupancy and its Relationship to Completion of Related Public Improvements It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution. BACKGROUND /AKMSIS Staff has been experiencing problems with enforcement of current policies regarding completion of public improvements as a condition of occupancy releases. As discussed in a previous report to City Council regarding final paving, raising of manholes, etc., the policy at that time was to allow occupancy if the public improvements were substantially complete (i.e., curb and gutter, sidewalk, base paving, street name signs, no obstructions, etc.) except for clean -up and final paving. This policy appeared to have worked reasonably well with developers who were established in this area. However, due to the housing market, there has been an increase in the number of new development companies formed and an increase in development companies becoming insolvent. Because of this, we have experienced an extensive increase in the number of problem developers who loose interest in a project after full occupancy and fail to complete clean -up items and to provide the required continuous maintenance on landscape areas. The problem is compounded when the development company dissolves or goes into receivership which is the ease with three current problem developments. It should be noted that public improvements are bonded, however, it Is often necessary to sue the bonding company to cause the improvements to be completed and this process may take years to achieve resolution. 37 ■ ■ BER 21, 1988 2 In an effort to avoid the, above situation,, current Engineering policy now, only allows for up to 95% occupancy prior to completion and acceptance Of all public improve ients: This policy is',based on Ordinance No. 31: which provides that'•all conditions of,developement approval be completed or guaranteed prior to occupancy. problems have arisen with the current policy in that when occupancies are not released, do to remaining public improvement, items, Uo',policy is challenged by the developer and enforcement is difficult, especially'when the property is in escrow and 'W-- fall out due to Occupancy being withheld by the City. "Developers have contended that Ordinance No. 31 has been complied with because the public improvements have been bonded. Therefore, staff believes it is necessary to have current policy formalised by City Council. Respectfu submitted, Attachment G. I RESOLUTION IJ ?1551 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF�THE CITY OF RANCf;O CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING, THE CITY ,' • EkGrUEER'S POLICY REQUIRING COMPLETION OF,CONDITIONS" _ OF APPROVAL AS A PREREQUISITE TO ENERGY CONNECTIONS. NON, THEREFORE, the City Council of the fifty of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby resolves as fallow: No person shall 'sake connections from a sour"i of energy, - fuel or power to any building service equipment which ft-regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by the conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: That in developments containing more than one building or unit, the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required conditions of approval of developnnt. In no case shall more than ninety -five percent (95%) of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by the conditions of approval a? development. , 3q 1jx� z 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA&IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of a Subordination Agreement for 8797 Strang Lane, submitted by William and Penny McAlpine It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Subordination Agreement submitted by William and Penny McAlpine and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same and cause the agreement to record. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was accepted by the City Council and recorded on August 17, 1981, as document No. 81 -18- 2271 in the official Records of San Bernardino County, State of California for construction of off -site street improvements adjacent to 8797 Strang Lane. in order to secure financing for his project, the lender requires that the subject Lien Agreement be subordinated to liens in favor of the lender. William and Penny McAlpine have submitted the attached Subrrdination Agreement for City Council approval. ResQ <� ubmitted, 'INF Attachment �0 /A! `` K: \ r ~ ! e : -e '§ } ! � � ` | g e ■ f & ' . / § � § / o Q \ § 2 ' "cF-,Pr�-. -'�v"r era °if�a •- _ ':r. �.;�> - :,a,_,:.,�a , RESOLUTION N0, 4559 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT FROM WILLIAM AND PENNY MC ALPINE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND - CITY CLERX TO SIGN SAME WHEREAS, a Ikal Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the fnstallation of off -site improvements, Including curb, gutter and pavement was approved by City Council on August 6, 1981 and recorded in San Berasrdino County on August 17, 1981, Instrument No. 81- 182271; and ;t: WHEREAS, for 'the developer to secure financing for the project, the lender requires that the above - mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in favor of the lender; and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordination Agreement to that effect for the City's approval and execution. NON, THEgeFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ! CUCAMONGA HFREBY RESOLVES, that said Subordination Agreemen• h- . �-' M hereby approved and the Mayor is imws by authorized to sign ymh9=Subordlnetyen Agameme on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk attest thereto. t a 4 PP�t i'Ir 't.�1F. v' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAiONGA STAFF REPORT Y DATE: September 21, 1938 t TO: City Council and City Manager ,I FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer y BY: Linda Seek, Engineering Technician t SUBJECT: Approval of Ma s, Improvement Agreements and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance and 2c District Tracts Street 13748, Lighting 18 andin13858,a located District atMos. the southwest ccrner of Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by M. J. Brock and Sons rfCOW*3C11TIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, accepting the subject agreements and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. the Mayor and Lighting Clerk to signisaidcagreementsaand to cause aidlmaps to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Street and4Milliken Avenue in theetLow Medium Development District, wweere 13e57 and approved by the Planning Commission on December 9, 1987, for the division of 65 acres into 232 lots. The Developer, M. J. Brock and Sons, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: STORM DRAIN TR 13748 TR 13748 TR 13857 TR 13858 Fafthfu' Performance Bond: $1,665,000 $106,000 $ 94,000 $ 98,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 832,000 S 53,000 $ 47,000 $ 49,000 Monumentation N/A S 7,550 $ 5,900 S 5,450 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Cleric's Office. 43 J M s Staff Report" Septeober 21, 1988" Tracts 13748, 1385714 13858 Page 2 4; r Letters of appproval have been received frost tho high school and elewntary school districts,and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.BR.'s havq;also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and WaiverAo Annexation' fors signed by the Developer is 'on file in the City Clark's office. Respect ulir suoitted, t Rhii: X . : jt8�7A7C —a6 Attachsents 4Y t, X _tom T ■ G a RESOLUTION' No755q , A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAIiCHO CUCARO*GA CALIFORNIA APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRBEM'E e IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. ANri FINAL IMPS OF TRACT NOS. 13744, 13857 AND 13858 WHEREAS, the Tentative Nap of Tract No 13748, consisting of 232 lots, submitted by M. J. Brock:and Sons, Subdivider, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue, has been'submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by'said Subdividor for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map'Act of'the,Stata of Calif seta, and in complfance.with the requirements of Ordinance.No.;28 of said City: and Wit REAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract calif Subdivider has offered the Improvement lgreement submitted herewith for aFproval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval satd Final Map offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is ap beproved and the Mayor is authorized to execute save on Dehalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improve"ant Security is accepted as good and sufficient, sublect to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers far dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approvcd and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. rnv�,- Ilzir 1, dU � RESOLUTION N0. Siva A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO �UCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 090EILING THE MIE%ATION OF F CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSWE/LIGHTING HAINTENANCE , DISTRICT FOR,TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858 WHEREAS, the City Council or the Cfty,o' nancho Cucamonga, California, has ereviously formed a special mintenanee'd,skrict pursuant to the terms of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19721 being Division 15, Part 2 of the Str -ts and Highways Code of the Stata of California, said special maintenance di —eict known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Maintenance District'); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and k, WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and ° WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their " written consent to the proposed annexation nithout notice and herein or filing of an Engineer's 'Report', g NOW, THEREFORE, ThT CITY 00041CIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the Exhibit as shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as described to Exhibit 'B' attached hereto W the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, fnCTUR-9-The levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. Mai s I ■ EXHIBIT 'A• ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 Banyan St, Lots 58.61, Lot A, rrac Lot A. Lot 32 Lot 33. Tract Ir4erbr Street'..___ _... Grout oovp I= 24,089 s 1. 89 85 13.292 eJ as 14,668 a 1. 134 M24 s1. 10,424 aJ. 85 11.13381. 101 Ave. Parkway 11, Tract 13857 Ave. Median MY O> RANCHO CUCAMONGA A 'Tract 13748, Tract i COUNlT OF BAN BE=NARDINO Tact 13858 BTATZ OF CAU "ORNU Nc, 6 $ V /,Luken Ave Parkway 19,90 s 1 k1213cen Ave Median: 24,224 s L Banyan St Parkway- Lot A. Lots 32 d 33 Trap 13748. 6,443 of Lot A. Tract 13857 Lois 941, Tract 13857 1,320 41. Lots 58 61 Traci 13858• 2.7G0 51. Grout oovp I= 24,089 s 1. 89 85 13.292 eJ as 14,668 a 1. 134 M24 s1. 10,424 aJ. 85 11.13381. 101 Ave. Parkway 11, Tract 13857 Ave. Median MY O> RANCHO CUCAMONGA A 'Tract 13748, Tract i COUNlT OF BAN BE=NARDINO Tact 13858 BTATZ OF CAU "ORNU Nc, 6 $ V M-A.: g EXHIBIT •B• PINIIECT NAME TRACTS 13748, 13857 AND 13858 No. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 232 N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 232 - SrREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of s to he Annexed District No. 1 "'" 15 _._ 1 --. ___ _•_ 2 90 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ` Turf Ground Cover Trees •• District No. Street Name Su. ft. Sa. ft. 1 Milliken Ave. Pktry. 19, 920 12,000 24,089 12,224 89 85 Milliken Ave. kedian 13,292 85 Banyan St. Pkry. --' Lot A. Lots 32 -33, Tract 13748 6443 , 14,668 134 Lot At Tract 13857 Lots MI, Tract 13857 -- 1,320 1,524 10,424 --- 85 101 Lots 58-61, Tract 13858 2,760 11 133 Interior Streets -3 BSI E Total V:.W t T 9 ,9 ■ t ., CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGAr STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 2, TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and 3randiStreet LightingoMaint tenanLandscape e Distict Nos. Maintenance No. 87 -28, located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, south of Sixth Street, submitted by James R. and Jerald B. Laird RECOMMENOATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the MAyor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND OR 87 -28, located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, south of Sixth Street, in the Industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on December 11, 1987, The Developers, James R. and Jerald B. Laird, are submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $12,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 6,000 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. 6 R.'s have Atto also Annexation forrm signed by ethe �Devel Developer 1s on The fileeninntheand City Clerks office. Resp tryri7'y submitted, R10i r Attachments ! /Gj =t Ilk- RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROV84UT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEKNT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -28 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an I7rovement Agreement executed on August 30,."1988, by James R. and Jerald 8. Laird as developers, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the west side of Lucas Ranch Road, south of Sixth Street, and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to Planning Commission, DR 27 -28; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement. ROW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. HEREBY RESOLVES that said Ipprovement Agreement and said Improvement Security +Spproved and the Mayor is hereby - authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. V �S r S RESOLUTION NO. %%- S & 9, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANRaPE/LIGHTIRG MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR OR 87 -28 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 ", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Hignways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District'); and MHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property lethfn the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report% NOW, THFREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit 'A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit 08' attached here+a Lc the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of trA Maintenance District, including The Tey of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. �f ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM s LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 3 1 AND 6 cm Or RANCHO CIJCAYONGA COUNTY OF SAN MNAWINO STATS OF CALIFORNIA n N • Ao+Ietr •e• PROJECT MANE OR 87_28 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 4,36 NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 8.7 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Ofstrtct No. No. of Lamps to be Annexed TF 6 1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT t Otstrlct No. Street Nape Turf sa• ft. 3 Ground Corer Trees So. ft. Ea. 12 r i nn.... n STAFF REPORT V� DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Panager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for 5- 87 -55, located on the east side of Rochester Avenue, north of the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, submitted by EighU, and Rochester, A Limited Partnership RECOMIEIMTION It is reccmended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND DR 87 -55, located on the east side of Rochester Avenue, north of the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, in the General Industrial Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on March 23, 1988. The Developer, Eighth and Rochester, A Limited Partnership, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $219,000 Labor and Material Bond: $109,500 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucaawnga County Water District. C.C. 6 R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file to the City Clerk's office. Res submitted, ' Attachments S� }.a..i: _.y ha '"�,t'�_s ry'S+,.v"`2!r';�Fr.:.K7�;� -. ..1_ » "- fi_.: •v •r•.f.n_t:+ °. a` ^.k": s' ?y�"i'r�..+•q.i RESOLUT;ON NO.- $oo-5(03 A RESOLUTION OF TIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,- CALIFORNIA; APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 87 -5S IM WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement .agreement executed an July 13, 1 1988, by Eighth and Rochester, A Limited Partnership as developer, ?- for the rovement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property r specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Rochester and north of the Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad, and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, 1s to be done in F, conjunction with the development of said real property as raferred to Planning Commission, Development Review No. 87 -55 and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which it) identified in said » -• Improvement Agreement. frY NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security T3pproved and the Mayor is4wtehy authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. '/ - 55 iryal, RESOLUTION N0. Q� -rJ(BI A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE'CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG , CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPEAIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR OR 87 -55 Callfornle,Ehpreviousy formed aosyectalimmaaintenanceodistrict9pursuant to the terms of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972', being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maint• n:e district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 'beet Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance D, Act No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Maintenance Dfstrict'); any WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this tfse the City Council 1s desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and incorporated hereto by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the Owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing Or filing of an Engineer's 'Report', NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAK09GA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bOiy hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as described In Exhibit 8 attached hereto to the Maintenance District. tncludfngSECe —I'N 3;of all assessments. shallibesapplicableito Maintenance District, annexed hereunder. y M Slo 1 r ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 � I J 7 SITE i O y u � T� I i I I 1 wr rs I j a y a SITE ,ma �° CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA !' sr COUNTY OF SAN =NARDINO • �C `C { B BTATII OF CA=RNE V. D i Im i O y u � ,ma �° CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA !' sr COUNTY OF SAN =NARDINO • �C `C { B BTATII OF CA=RNE V. D i Im y u � M I I 1 wr rs I j a I I ,ma �° CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA !' sr COUNTY OF SAN =NARDINO • �C `C { B BTATII OF CA=RNE V. D i Im ;�1'j. ". •t:l ate. Y4','��: -•'yy .'., i('tr'r ^'�rH:r` if`.It`4 �wt�r;w. Jxr.�: ... ".r+_S,`J "'.:r • '�i_, xiF�.J -�,i[i -M}S� Yh� !W i i� - 0.'i. "V•�P•!' ='�"y SO '�: �1'' T- •Y'�.u'x .}� Z 4�w`•i f'Y�W.y+,�?+•- :.;+'Lr di' .+ ,r .rc,�;.,v4. GT"��� 'S� . � 9 ♦ 1 x `1IL� ExHlorT'6' PR&;ECT NAME DR 87 -55 V, ". s' .: NO. OF-D.U. OR ACREAUE: 8.0 NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: _, 16 . 'x STREET LIGNTINS MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Lamps tt be Annexed District No. OEM- _i 1 3 --- °- --- 6 - -- --- °- --- --- LANDSCAPE VAINTERANCE DISTRICT strict No. Street Name ST_ Q. ft 6rSq. ft. re Ol 3 25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAbIONGA ut :r STAFF REPORTL DATE: September 21, 1988 T0: City Council ind City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract 13270, located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Western Properties It is recommended that tha City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 13270, accepting tte subject agreewnt and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUNO Tract 132 "), locatvd at the northwest corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, in the Medium -Nigh Oevelepment District, was approved by the Planning Commission on April B. 1987, for the division of 24.19 acres into 1 lot. Western Properties has requested soecial assistance in recordation of Tract 13270. Recordation of the map will not provide any special quarantees of issuance of grading or building permits outside of normal procedures. The Developer will be submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvevents in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Band: Not available at time of report preparation. Labor and Material Bond: Not available at time of report preparation. Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office Letters of approval have been receiv3d from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. 6 R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver tG Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respec.A submittod, Attachments �9 5yi r, V ♦ 'J RESOLUTION un A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY)CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPROVEIEMT AGREEMENT, �? IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MJIP Or TRACT NO. 13270 WHEREAS, the Tentative Nap of Tract No. 13270 consisting of 1 lot, submitted by Western Properties, Subdivider, located at the northwest corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucaak�nga by said Subdivider for epproval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider as offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said Gy . City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for d. approval said Final Nap offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. HOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: d 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same 0. on behalf of City and authorized to said thereto;ea dty Clerk is 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted rs good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content tt*reof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City ;lee; is authorized m execute the certificate thereon or. behalf of said City. /�T�__ QPO 4 r T $C F RESOLUTION N0, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LAIIDSCAPEAIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13270 le WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972', being [•'vision „S, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said iv special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Lighting Nalntonance District No. 1 and Street Lighting ` Maintenance District No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the ' Mainterance District "); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article ? of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and Lig9hting Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional C territor,Y to the Matntenanee District; and i WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice end hearing or filing of an Engineer's 'Report". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY (IF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That tin above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body heeeey orders the annexatirn of the proper as sham in Exhiuit 'A' and tho work program areas as described in Exhibit 'B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. !FCTION 3: That all future prcceedings of the Maintenance Dist -ict, including !heiery of all assesssents, shat'. be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder 6/ EMIBIT "A" — ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. i AND 4 frL L,q jig x•" - b mlSt(Arrrrrnl a /fir , 1 t BPINIL Ih �i`(, v •. � li .a 7 3,$S1 Cairn ufr . I�nI(ffgaurt3IDt�� ImI CITY 01 RANCHO CUCAMONGA sr COUNTY OF WN BnNARDINO AZ srATE OF CALMRNIA �j w DrAIRIT "So PROJECT NAME 13210 NO. OF D.U. OR ACV-AGE: 280 d.u. NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 140 STREET LIGHTING MAINTIERANCE DISTRICT No. of Laaos to be Annexed District No. fn—wto — 21;DW- 173TJd 1 -- 10 12 4 - -- 4 21 . -. ... ... --- Y i LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Name Sq. ft. Su, ft. Ea. 4 Church Street 10,420 -- 33 Milliken Avenue 6,224 1,186 13 :4 T. i ;r. ■ a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT a:t DATE: SepterDer 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Nap, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Tract 13273, located on the southeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive, submitted by Western Propertics RECONOWTION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Tract 13273, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Kaintendnce District Nos, 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/SACKGROUND Tract 13273, located on the southeast corner of 91111ken Avenue and Mountain view Drive, in the Medium Reside.,tial Develppm:nt District, was approved by the Planning Commission on May 27, 1987, for the division of 15.8 acres into 1 lot. Western Properties has requested special assistance in recordation of Tract 13270. Recordation of the map will not provide any special quarantees of issuance of grading or building permits outside of normal procedures. The Developer will be submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off - to improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: Not available at time of report preparation. Labor and Material Bond: Not available at tin of report preparation. Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of apprcval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County (later District. C.C. b R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. AResp e flee, RHM:L �", Attachments i RESOLUTION N0. cV D 6(01 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCIMNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13273 WHEREAS, the Tentative Nap of Tract No. 13273 consisting of 1 lot, submitted by Western Properties, Subdivider, located on tie southeast corner >` of Milliken Avenue and Mountain View Drive has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for appproval by said City as provided in C' the Subdivision Map Act of the State of CaMornfa,'and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS. to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Kip of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the 14, Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said x;4 City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. - HU. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGII, j HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: e x' 1. That said Improvemient Ayyres ent be and the same is i approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute save s an behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to farm and 9 content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 1,' i- �5 ■ �k 4■ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA„ ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO -A LANOSCAPEAIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FORJRACT 13273 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Caltfornia, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act, of 19720, being Division IS, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of, California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Ltghting'Malntenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Maintenance District'); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972' authorize the,armexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District ;'and WHEREAS, at this tine the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's 'Report'. NOW. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the property as shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as described in Exhibit 'B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including tie— Tevy —of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. M10 f w'• i' } 1 r ASSESSMIBT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 ptt;Avpk, '• 6 i W 0 y� CITY OF RANCHO CuCAMONOA COUNTY OF BM B>iRNARD 4 STATER OF CAL170RMA N F�,oA' Al — r CITY OF RANCHO CuCAMONOA COUNTY OF BM B>iRNARD 4 STATER OF CAL170RMA N EXHIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME TRACT 13273 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 256 d.u. NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 128 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of Laws to be Annexed Listrlet No. 1 _» —_ 4 1 - -- 4 3 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT District No. Street Nam 4 M1111ken Avenue Turf Sq. ft. 6.614 Ground Cover Sq. ft. 536 Trees Ea. 12 mss■ c CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of of Isprovement Agreement and Improvement Security and 3randinstr et Lighting MaintenanceeDist Maintenance Nose 1 District for CUP 85 -19, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and Ramona Avenue, submitted by Ken Ruby Construction Company RECOINENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions theroannexation8tolLand capeiMaintena ce District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6, and authorizing the Mayor and the Cityy Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGRDUND CUP 85 -19, located on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue, in the Commrunity Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 14, 1985. The Developer, Ken Ruby Construction Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site Improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: 5214,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $107,000.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. 6 R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorn ey. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. RespgetfuTfy'submitted, RFbfrLB:JM: J�- Attachment Q RESOLUTION NO. 0 56q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO " CUCAh0WGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT •` AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR C.U.P. 85-19 WHEREAS, the City Council of UN City of Rancho Cucamonga, ; California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement executed on July 14, 1988, by Ken Ruby Construction Company is developer, for the improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southwest corner of FootSill Boulevard and Ramona Avenue; and WHEREAIS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement-and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development "of said real property as referred "to Planning Cowtssion, CUP 85-19; and, WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and.accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified In said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHD CUCAWWBA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 11-_I� P y3 • i� 3• RESOLUTION ND. DD�rj IV A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHOWA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPEAIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR CUP 85 -19 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terns of the °Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19720, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Maintenance District'); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and L1 htiag Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's 'Report'. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS ; OLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation. of the proper as sham in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as described In Exhibit B attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including ih'Tey of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 7i V J� r= c 4" I ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ILANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 lOO,WLL t MOULEVARD i .. — T HAMPSHIRE •r—= OTREET L as CY'PT 0lp RANCHO CUCAI[ONOA _ ,_- • = COUNTY OF SAN SUNASDINO 1� 6 STATE 01 CAIAII►OINI/► - v lei Io. ra ro, Iw ro. roR ra roE Ior .. — T HAMPSHIRE •r—= OTREET L as CY'PT 0lp RANCHO CUCAI[ONOA _ ,_- • = COUNTY OF SAN SUNASDINO 1� 6 STATE 01 CAIAII►OINI/► - v lei 0 EXHIBIT 'd' PROJECT RAKE CUP 85 -19 ), N0. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 3.22 NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 6 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT District No. No. of Laws to be Annexed a 1 _.. .._ 4 .._ --- 6 1 --- --- .° --- 1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT District No. Street Name 3 Y Turf Ground Cover Trees Sq. ft. _ So. ft. Ea. 3S 5' r w■� CITY OF RANCHO C'iCAAIONGA� '= STAFF REPORT ;s DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City En_Ineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SU&IECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 9504, located on the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Base Line Road, submitted by Base Line and Haven Center RECONEIOATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension an4 security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements for Parcel Map 9504 were approve: er+ the City Council on August 8, 1988, in tta following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $200,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $100,000.00 The developer, Baseline and Haven Center, is requesting apprcval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Iaprovemint Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Res pal y sugpttua, RHM: SMd-: Attachments 7 `� °r WHEREAS, the CitV_Counetl of the City,of Rancho Cucamonga, California, his' for its comsl4%eration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on September,21; 1968, by-Base Line Road and 'Haven Center, as s developer, for the improvement -of public right -of -way agiaceat to the real Property specifically described therein, and generally located on the u northoast corner of Haven,Avenue and Baseline Road; and t�. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement mentdand subject, to the terms thereof is to be done in conjunction with of said Parcel Map 9554; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and ' 4� accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified ✓�_ in said Improvement Agreement Extension. '• NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be- and approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of • the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 7-5 y is 5°ei_ RESOLUTION NO. - a zr +" A RESOLUTION OF._TNE_CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF_PANCNO. R` Al CUCANDW .A ;- CALIFORNIA;-- APPBDYING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT R'" EJfTENSION RID']1lPROYEM- - SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 9504 ! °r WHEREAS, the CitV_Counetl of the City,of Rancho Cucamonga, California, his' for its comsl4%eration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on September,21; 1968, by-Base Line Road and 'Haven Center, as s developer, for the improvement -of public right -of -way agiaceat to the real Property specifically described therein, and generally located on the u northoast corner of Haven,Avenue and Baseline Road; and t�. WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement mentdand subject, to the terms thereof is to be done in conjunction with of said Parcel Map 9554; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and ' 4� accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified ✓�_ in said Improvement Agreement Extension. '• NOM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be- and approved and the Mayor 1s hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of • the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 7-5 w KIN -=- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Publfc Works Inspoctoc.-2-�— SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Nap 10771, located on the south side of Milson "Avenue, east of Chaffey College, submitted oy Grigsby Development 'ECOMIEIDATION It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public fe;rovaeents for Parcel Map 10771 were approved by the City Council on August 6, 1987, in the follmring amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $76,000 Labor and Material Bond: $38,000 1be developer, Grigsby Development, is requasting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreemnnt. Copies of the Iyrovement Agreement Extension are available to the City Clerk's Office. Res f TT,1� su itted, RHN :SMG� Attachments 7(P a RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY: OF RAKRO CUCAHONGA,- CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT A5REEIIEWT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 10771 WHEREAS, the City, council of the City of Rancho _Cucamonga,. California, has for -its consideration an Improvement•Agreement Extension executed on September 21,' -1988; by Grigsby Development as developer,ifor, the improvement of public-, right -of -way adj&cent,to tha real _ property specifically described therein, and genarally'located on the south side of Wilson,Avenue, east of Chaffey College; and , WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described to said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Parcol Map 071; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. - NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Californta, that saidr mp2vement Agre.'•ent Extension •nd said Improvement Security h• '"" "" °'� - ^•' ^•by- approved and the Mayor is hgaeby- authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension an behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 77 1� t F CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA ri;d , �ri+ STAFF REPORT t�i DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works inspecuk= ^ SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12650 -3, located an the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Hillside Road, submitted by Deer Creek company RECOM0W1TION It is recommvmmd that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting thR subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. AHt1YSISAACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public Improvements for Tract 126550 -3 were approved by the City Council on August 20, 1987, in the following amounts. Fa'thful Performance Bond: $248,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $124,000.00 The developer, Deer Creek Company, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the, Improvement Agreement Extension are available In the City Clark's Office. Re /spec it ubm tted, C r RHN:SMG: Attachmen•s 72 E Y a J RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONSA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEKENT EXTENSION AND INPROVENENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 12650 -3 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration'an Improvement.Agreement Extension executed on September 21,'1988, by Deer Creek Company as developer,'for the Improvement of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Hillside Road; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the tens thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract_12650 -3; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sigma said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk'to attest thereto. 75 r, 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspec SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tracts 12671 -1, 12611 -2, 12671 -3 and 12671 -4, located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mountain view Drive, submitted by Lewis Homes RECO VOCATION It IS recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the MAynr and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Aaproveaent Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tracts 12671 -1, 12671 -2, 12671 -3 and 12571 -4 mere approved by the City Council on August 20, 1987, in the following eoounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $1,034,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 517,000 The developer, Lewis Homes, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. RespC 91y ltted, � RHN: Attachments ♦ i i RESOLUTiON NO. A RESOLUTION aF THE,CITY,COOMCIL;OF•7HE.CIn OF RA1lClt0 EXTENSION AND INPROIVEIENT SECURITY AGREE NT 12671 -2, 12671 -3,AM0 12671 -4 NHEREAS. the CI execute of the C1 of exelfte has Por its consfderetion an I b Rancho Cucaegnga, improvement ofppt bier 21� 19 ,-b.Levis Home svemedeveio�n aExteesion described therein and of- of to the real property speclfiealiy Avenue and Mountain View Drive; andcated on the rorthwest corner of Xfillken ImDrovemeWWFHERREAS. the installation of such ieproveoents, described in said conjunction th� the etdevejoptof° said Tracts 12�if, 1s to done in 12611 -4; and ; 12671 -2, 12671 -3 and accompaniWWH per. said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and bod and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said 100rovement y go Agreement Extension. HEREBY NON. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF RESOLVES that said Improvoment Agreement THE CITY andNsaid Improvement Security be and the same aaappre hereby approved and the Myyor is hereby of Rancho Cucamonga. said nditheroCtaen�lAgret�ettExtension to behalf of the City M �I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT a DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approral of Map, Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of Covenant, Conditions and Restrictions. Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexatton to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Has. 1 and 2 for Tract 13248, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues, submitted by H b S Capital Enterprises RECO/EIDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving Tract 13248, accepting the subject agreements and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 13248, located on the south side of Highland Avenue, between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues, in the Medium Residential Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on August 27, 1986, for the division of 5 85 acres into 60 lots. The Developer, H A S Capital Enterprises, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $150,000 Labor and Material Bond: f 75,000 Copies of the agreements and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C.6 R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney, but the developer is requesting a Postponement of Recordation of the C.C. b R's until they have Depar*-v*nt of Real Estate approval. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation farm signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respec 11 , su a tted, RHH:LBQM4mb- — Attachments Q� RESOLUTION N0. -5rP A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IWROYEMEWT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AN AGREEMENT FOR POSTPONEMENT OF RECORDATION OF COYEHANTS, C=ITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS, AND FINAL ►YIP OF TRACT NO. 13248 WHEREAS, the Tentative Hap of Tract No. 13248 consisting of 60 lots, submitted by H b S Capital Enterprises, Subdivider, located an the south side R- of Highland Ar—nue, between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with goo: and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Ayyreem�ent be and the save is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. M M I h = RESOLUTION NO. 76 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDWA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF _ CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPEAIGHTING MAINTENANCE P; DISTRICT FOR TRACT 13248 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, has previously formed a special- maintenance district pursusnt'to the terns of the ;L&ndscaping'and Lighting Act -of 1972; being Diviv''ion 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Cole of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Kafntenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the `Maintenance District "): and . WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and Ligghting Act of 1972" authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District, and WHEREAS, at this p tine the City Council is desirous to take proceedings heroinxbytethis property described the Maintenance "District; and te and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notir and hearing or filing of an Engineer's "Report ". NON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RE SOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation o7 the property as shown in Exhibit 'A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance Distract, including the Tevy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. I N � ti r i' M, EXHIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 CITY 0>f RANCHO cu C"ONOA e l s COUNTY OF am HERNARDINO 8TAT3 OF CALIII+ORNZA y rW ,3 r m a s LOT A ! ��i.rav� 10 ......M ...� ! t! S eS7'r a _ 12 „ COSY I � 1MV\/ :Ctt Lr=„ 13 0 Q T L.�w• �� ��r� v � l.r'� l i LOT �A i lei l ,ru.arra � t� CITY 0>f RANCHO cu C"ONOA e l s COUNTY OF am HERNARDINO 8TAT3 OF CALIII+ORNZA y rW ,3 r m a EXHIBIT 08' PROJECT NAME TRACT 13248 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 60 NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 60 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of La stn be Annexed D1strlet No. 58Otii-- 45d0i —� 1 ... 2 --- - - --' 2 --- --- --' --- --- [s s LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover Trees D1strlct No. Street Name Sq. ft. So. ft. Ea. 1 25 1 c:. r , ■ 9 Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M Cilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion REC49EIDATION: The required street improvements for Parcel Nap 8842, Parcel 2 have been eoapleted in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said :aprovcments, authorize the City Engineer to'file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $52,000. Background /Analysts Parcel Map 8842, Parcel 2 - located on Terra Vista Parkway east of Spruce Avenue. Release: DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes of California P. 0. Box 807 Upland, CA 91786 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $62,000.00 RespectfyNy-suhmi tted, RM:SMO:jmb Attachment $7 I .tee ?r�s".•i.���l,". RESOLUTION N0. .• . t� CUCAMWGA..t CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING TTHHETPUBLIC INPROVOWS FOR PARCEL NMP 8842;:PARCEV2, ANO-AUTH04IZ14G THE FILING OF A NOTICE'OF CWLETION FOR THE YORK WHEREAS, the constructian of ublic t Parcel 2, have been completed to the,sittsfactifon Of tthe City Engineer;Pand42, WHEREAS, A Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. hereby resolves, that�the�workiIs herebylacceptedtInd theC1N EnglnceerUis authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. � IJ i �V F. r:2 I — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1980 g a TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works InspectorQ 2 Z— SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion ���+ RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for OR 96 -26 Phase !I (PH 10237) have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completior. and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance eo:d in the amount of 5195,000. Background /Analysis DR 86-26 Phase II (PH 10237) - on the north side of Jersey Boulevard between Utica Avenue and Vincent Avenue DEVELOPER: Martin Jaska, Incorporated 8509 Utica Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $195,000 Respecctf submitted, /P.HM. : s-97G" d Attachment RESOLUTION NO. $00 6r)g A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA,- CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS LL FOR OR _e6 -26 PHASE II (PM 10237) AND AUTHORIZING THE 2 FILING OF A NOTICE OF'COMPLETIOM FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for OR 86-26 Phase II (PM 10237) have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed„ certifying the work complete. NON. THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Raacho Cucawnga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Erglneer is authorized to sign and fill a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. / D •Fi Y� _.- ST.AFF REPORT DATE: Septamber 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works lnspec?O- , SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 12772 -2 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recomendod that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $6,000.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Ponbrmance Bond in the amount of $60,000.00. Background /Analysis Tract 12772 -2 - located on the east side of Ramona Avenue between Base Line Road and Church Street. DEVELOPER: M d S Residential Development 2950 Airway Avenue, Suite B -1 Costa Mesa, California 92626 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $6,000.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $60,000.00 Respec submitted, RRM:SMG:sjm Attachment 1�r r P e . -�'. G:��i` i��. "�SY �vr �T i._. -_t>?i ��� �.; :I"lj •.J - a. -. - it 'n0 L.a.�S_ .. 1E RESOLUTION NO. 57 wRS 8 A RESOLUTION OF THE -.CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS' FOR TRACT 12772 =2 -AND AUTHORIZ14 THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR ,THE WORK " t WHEREAS, the constrktion of public improvements for Tract 12772.2 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Novice of_Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW. THEREFORE, the City Council of the MY of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted anm the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. ' I1 514 ■ J O ."Y ■ MY OF 1At9CHO CUC"IONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: Cityy Cooncil'and City Manager FROM: fU;sell it. Maguire, City Enginevr BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public liorks lnspecto—T- SU9JECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion The required street improvements for Tract 12772 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City council accept ssid improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of S30,OGO.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk'to release the Faithful Performance Band in the amount of $300,OOO.CO. Background /Analysis Tract 12772 - located on the erst side of Ramina Avenue betreen Base Line Road and Church Street. DEYELOPEP.: M 6 S Ra•sdertial Development 2950 Al ti „ Avenue, Suite B -1 Costa He" California 92626 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Band (Street) f 30,000.00 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) s3U0,000.O0 hespect1 ,submitted, RMDi.•S :sjm Attacha•ent 93 .r _ I • L -` r RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTIOX'OK THE CITY COUNCIL OF -THE CITY OF RA NCHO F-I- CUCJ4"W;' CALIFORNIA,. i ACCEPTING -THE PUBLIC, IMPROVEMENTS FOR TAXI 12772-AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF'A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FoR-Twwom WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12772 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. and WHEREAS. a Notice of Cc6pletfon is required to be filed, certifying the work couplote. NOW, THEREFORE. the City Council of the City of.Rancho-Cucawngs hereby resolves, that the work,fs hereby4ccepted and the City Engineer Is authorized to s'gn and fflO a Notice of Completion with -the county Recorder of San Bernardino county. j 4?� RESOLUTION N0, C9 Ch ^{Q CUCAIONfAt CALIFORNIA.-ACCEPTING TTIIC PUBLIC IMPRORAMCYENENTS FOR TRACT 12835 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE wwc been caKaWAS, the Construction of Public improvements for Tract 12835 have gleted to the satisfactioa'of the City Engineer; and the work NIERIEete a Notice ot.toyletion is required to be filed, certifying hereby resolves, that wwoorkib Council of RC1� ECuc'awrgis authorized to sign and Me a Notice, of COapletion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1980 TO: City Council and City Manger FRO11: Russell N. Maguire, C1ty Engineer BY: Steve N. Gilliland, Publ.- Works Inspect r SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECONIO ATION: The required street ieprovcments for Tract 12835 have been completed In an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of 58,300, authorize the City Engineer to ffla a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of 583,000. Background /Analysis Tract 12835 - located on the east side of Vineyard Avenue north of Arrow Highway Acceot: Release: DEVELOPER: Paris Vineyard Joint venture 22632 Golden Springs Road 1270 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $8,300 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $83,000 Respectf y submitted, RHM:SMG:Jmb Attachment 9s A W, CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA STAFF REPORT x' . M DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Yorks Inspect SUBJEU: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 11350 lccated on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue RECMEICATIOY: It Is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clark to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background /Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Lowy Development 4801 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 230 Los Angeles, California 90010 -3813 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bonds $21,000.00 S 3,000.00 Resp ly, submitted. RHM:SMG:sjm q7 e YE RECON OWTION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Archibald Avenue Realignment Project, Contract No. 87 -142 as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion', and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of £294,442.41 and accept the 10% Maintenance Bond in the amount of £34,588.35 for one year, and authorize the release of the retentfom in the amount of $17,294.17 and the Labor and Materials Bond in Vie amount of £147,221.21, 35 days after the recordation of said nnttte if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $345,883.46. Background /Analysis The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is £345,883.46 which includes 3 minor change order(s) for additional traffic signal conduit hydroseeding and delays and 1 change erder(s) previously approved by council for additional paving. The original amount approved by Council was $324,000.00 (and the revised amount approved by Council is £360,000.00. Respe� 11 ,submitted, RHM:ML: jh cc: Purchasing Attachment PMM s A r• = CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA - STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Michael D. Long, Sr. Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Accept the Archibald Realignment Project, between 19th Street and Highland Avenue, Contract No. 87 -142 as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a `Notice of Completion', and approve the final contract amount of £34S,883.46. RECON OWTION: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Archibald Avenue Realignment Project, Contract No. 87 -142 as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion', and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of £294,442.41 and accept the 10% Maintenance Bond in the amount of £34,588.35 for one year, and authorize the release of the retentfom in the amount of $17,294.17 and the Labor and Materials Bond in Vie amount of £147,221.21, 35 days after the recordation of said nnttte if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $345,883.46. Background /Analysis The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is £345,883.46 which includes 3 minor change order(s) for additional traffic signal conduit hydroseeding and delays and 1 change erder(s) previously approved by council for additional paving. The original amount approved by Council was $324,000.00 (and the revised amount approved by Council is £360,000.00. Respe� 11 ,submitted, RHM:ML: jh cc: Purchasing Attachment PMM s A r• RESOLUTION N0. D O —5S2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR APCHIDALD AVENUE kEALIGNENT PROJECT, COHTRtCT NO. 87 -112 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public faprovements for Archibald Avenue -` Realignment Project have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filod, certifying the work eonplete. f*_ NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucsnnga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notfce of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. S VA a, . I DATE: TO: FROM: BT: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Michael D, long, Senior Public Works Inspector J s � Accept the Improvement of Archibald Avenue at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing, 08- SBd- O- RCuc- RRS -R078 (2) as complete, release bonds and authorize the City En near to file a 'Notice of Completion' and approve t)re final contract amount of $116,739.44. d?9.—? L. t 17 . It is recommended that the City Council accept the Improvement of Arcnibald Avenue at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing, 08- SBd -O- RCuc - RAs- RO78 -(2) as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a •Notice of Completion', and authorize the release of the Faithful Performance :and in the amount of $112,456.00, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $5,836.91 and the tabor and Materials Bond in the amount of $56,228.00, 35 days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. Also, approve the final contract amount of $116,739.44. Background /Analysis The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount is $116,739.44 which includes 1 minor change order for additional Asphalt Paving. The original amount approved by Council was $125,000.00. Respect u y submitted, RHM:)CL:sjm cc: Purchasing 100 F 1 y. l� RESOLUTION NO. �a3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE IWPROYEMEWT OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AT THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD•CROSING AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK i WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the improvement of Archihald Avenue at the Southern Pacific Railroad Crossing have been compleW to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and .WHEREAS,_& Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work'complete. // NOW, THEREFORE, ,the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 1 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGH STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 TD: City Council and City Manager FROM: Jim Hart, Administrative Services Director SUBJECT: CDMFIRMTTON F LASED SESSION ACTTDN AT 7NE Cm CDUNtiI, LI ICpf 1�—IiER 7 1988 RECARDIIC RG D RECOMMENDATION: I The City Council confirm the action taken in closed session on September 7, 1988, authorizing a change from the American Trust / Rubell Helm Medical Insurance Plan to the Principal Financial Group Medical Insurance Plan, effective September 1, 1988, BACKGROUND- There became a need to change medical insurance providers due to perceived Problems with the American Trust /Rebell Helm Plan. We had received a bid from the Principal Financial Group to provide the medical insurance and after reference checks, concluded the City would be better served by the Principal Financial Group Plan. Respectfully submitted, Jim Hart �0 Administrative Services Director JH :cm 1 �� t CIA ry- RESOLUTION N0. 88-* 'b A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAHUNGA. CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCU ELATE WHICH ARE NO LOM3ER REQUIRED AS PRO- VIDED UNDER CCVEMOM T CDD3 SECTION 340x0 S WHEREAS, it bas been determined that certain City records under the charge of the following City Departments are no longer required for public or private purposesf ,• ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT AND PLANNING DIVISION Q WHEREAS, it has been determined that destruction of the 1l above- mentioned materials is necessary to conserve storage space, an reduce L staff time, expanse, and confusion in handling, and informing the public; and WHEREAS. Section 34U90 of the Goverment Coda of the State of Califor- nia authorizes the head of a City department to destroy any City records and • documents which are over two years old under bls or her charge, without eking a copy thereof, after the same are no longer required, upon the approval of the City Council by revolution and the written consent of the City Attorney; and WIU:REAS, it in tbev fore desirable to destroy said retards as listed in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. in storage, without mak- ing a copy thereof, which are aver two years olds and WHEREAS, said retards have been approved for destruction by the City Attorney. NW. THEREFORE. 711E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMOMA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 11 That approval and authorization is hereby given to destroy those records deocribed an Exhibit "A" attached berato and made a part hereof. SECTION 21 That the City Clerk is authorized to allow examination by and domtion to the Department of Special Collections of the University Re- search Library, iniversity of California, or other historical society designer- ad by the City Council. any of the records described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a par. hereof, except those dunned to be confidential. SECTION 31 That the City Clark shall certify to the adoption of this resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect. 1, 03 i ESJIBIT "A" ADMINISTRATION DEPAETMEEI /CITY CURB DIVISIOM 0701 -01 Cemmisaion Applications and Miscellaneous Correspondence (Perks, Planning, and Advisory Commissions) - 1982 -1984 0701 -01 Mobile Noah Residents' Committee Miscellaneous Corrcopcademe and Reference Papers - 1984 -1985 0701 -11 Mayor and Council correspondence - January 1 theougb July 31, 1986 0206 -03 School Impaction Saporta (S3201 Punts) - JeSO through Ju17 1986 0703 -04 Litigation (Christensen v. Authelet came) March 1986 0704 -01 Mobile Some General Correspondence sal Reference Papers - 1984 through July 31, 1986 Seat and Confer Papers - 1984 1150 -01 Animal Control Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Paparo - 1984 -1985 1170 -04 Refuse Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1983 1170 -09 Solid Waste Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1984 through July 31, 1986 1180 -10 City Council Requests - 1985 through July 31, 1986 1180 -10 Public Inquiry and Complaints: General Correelandmace - 1977 through July 31, 1986 Ply Problem - 1585 Post Office Problems - 1977 -1985 1180 -11 Public Comment CarJs - 1985 1205 -01 Cable T.V. Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1985 through July 31, 1986 1205 -06 Telephone Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1985 through July 31, 1496 1206 -01 Ambulance Correspondence and Reference ?opera - 1985 through July 31, 1986 1301 -03 Alarm System Miocellaneous Reference Papers 1979 through July 31, 1986 1302 -09 Pirevorks Miacellaneoum Correspondonee and Reference Papers - 1982 -July 31, 1986 �? a' Rdsolution No. 08 -►esi Page 2 1403 -02 8priag Clean Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1985 through July 31, 1986 1403 -11 Vector Control Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1985 through July 31, 1986 1404 -06 Park Development Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference apers - 1979 through July 31, 1986 1405 -01 001 Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1978 Ln "Sh July 31, 1986 1405 -01 Sch-01 Financing Assistance 56201 (School Pees) Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1979 through 1981 1501 -08 Sister City Miscellaneous Reference Papers - 1981 1503 -01 LAPCO /pontana /City of Rancho Cucamonga Litigation papers Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1985 1505 -01.01 City Manager Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1985 through July 31, 1986 1505 -01.02 Administrative Analyst Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1981 through July 31, 1986 1505 -01.02 Assistant City Manager Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1979 through July 31, 1986 1601 -01 City Facilities Unsigned agreements for telephone equipment - 1985 1601 -02 Library Miscellaneous Correspondence and Reference Papers - 1985 - July 31, 1986 PLANNING DIVISION 0802 -01 Model Nome Sales Office Permits - 1901 -1983 1402 -03 Temporary Special Event Parmits - 1981 -1983 C \YP"gLERI(\\qES88 0 e ORDINANCE No. 374 - AN ORDrNANCB'OF THE CITY COUNCIL or 1718 CITY OF RANCRo CICAMONGA. 'CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING AN AMEN HEW To THE ODNTRACr BEINBE9 TNB CITr COUNCIL or Mm CITY OF RANCHO C7CAMONGA AND THE BOARD OR ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYBES1 RETIRffiffiNr SFSTEK The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does hereby ordain an follwst - SECrION 1. That an mendment to the Contract betweeu the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California, and the Board of Administration, California public Employaoe, Retirement Syatm is hereby authorised, a copy of said Amendment being attached br�ato, rArked "Exhibit A ". "and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein ant out in full. SBCfION 2. The Mayor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, is hereby authorized, empowered. and directed to execute said mandment for and on behalf of said Agency. SECTION 3. The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and thu City Clerk shall cause the am* to be published within fifteen (15) days after its pannage At least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Omtario. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. I C) (!t> A t EI(HI81T mAn c,.. C O P If • • • Ordinance No. 374 •i' Page 3 110\01 � AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BEIVEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION - ' .y: Or THE • PUBLIC EMP60TEE3' RETlasmm Sum AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY or RAACMO COCANDNCA The Beard of Administration, Public Eaployea' Retirement System, hereinafter referred to As board, and the'govtrning body of AbOve' public agency, hereinafter referred.to as Public Agency, having entered tnt, contract effective January 28, 1978, and witnessed January 26, 1970, and as amended effectivo September 22, 1980 and November 16, 1981, which provides for participation of Public Agency In said System, Board and Public Agency hereby agree as follows, A. Paragraphs 1 through 9 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed effective November 16, 1981, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs numbered 1 through 10 lncluelve: I All words and terms used herein which are defined In the Public Mployess' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein unless otherwise specifically provided. 'Normal retirement age* shall mean age 60 for local miscellaneoua members. 2 Public Agency shall participate In the Public Employees' Retirement System from and after January 28, .978 "king Its employees as hereleafier provided, members of mild System subject to all provisions of the Public Enployeas' Retirement Law except such am apply only on election of a contracting agency anJ are not provided for herein and to all amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by express Provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contnct- Ing agency. 3 Employees of Public Agency In the following Classes shall become members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as are excluded by law or this agreement: Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as local miscellaneous members). 7 In addition to the Classes of employees excluded from membership by said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become members of said Retirement System: EXCLUDE ALL SAFETY EMPLOYEES. 107 Ordinance No. 374 s e A, C O P t A e e Page 4 S. The tractlon of final compensation to be provided for each year of credited prior and current service as a local miscellaneous member shall be determined in accotdanca with Section 21251 13 of said Retirement Lai (21 at age 60 Pull). 6. The following additional provisions of the Public E ployees- Retirement Law, which apply only upon election of a contracting agency, shall apply to the Public Agency and Its employees, a. Section 90024.2 (One -year Final Compensation). b. Section 20930.3 (Military Service Credit), as defined In Chapter {� 830, Statute$ of 1976. r Off\: gertlons 21022/11022.1 (:ndustrial Disability Retirement) foe p Local stacellanaous masters. `0 •• � d Saeclon 11298 (Increased Non- Induat[lal Disability Allowance). e Sections 11380 - 21387 (1959 Survivor Banefits) Including Section 21382.4 (Third Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits). tip t Section 20614, Statutes of 1978, (Reduction of Noimal Member �. Contribution Rate). P[ou September 22, 1980, thrcugh November r� 15, 11181. the normal local miscellaneous member contribution rate �+ shall be 0%. 6Q 9 Section 40614, Statutes of 1980, (To Prospectively Revoke Section Qt.' 20614. Statutes of 1978). 7, Public Agency, In accordance with Government Code Section 20759, shall not be considered an •oployec• for purposes of the Public Employees' Retirement Law. Contributions of the Public Agency shall be fixed and determined as provldad In Government Code Section 20759, and such contributions hereafter made shall be held by the Board as provided In Government Code Section 20759. 8 P•,blic Agency shall Contribute to said Retirement System as follows, A with respect to local miscellaneous members, the agency shall contribute the following percentages of salaries earned as mnmbars of aatd Retirement System, (t) 6 738 percent until June 30, 2000 on account of the liability for current service benefits ISubject to annual change.) b Public Agency Shall Contribute $3 00 per employee on account of the liability for the 1959 Survivor Program provided under Section 21381 4 of said Retirement Law (Subject to annual change 1 In addition, all assets and llAbllltles of Public Agency and Its employees shall be pooled In a single account, based on term Insurance rates, for beneficiaries of all local miscellaneous members. x' r C O P Y B e a ordinance No„ 37, a Page S C. A rnsonnble amount, as fixed by the Board, Payabli In one In -r stalleent.ribhin 60 days of dab of contract to cover the costs Of adminiececlnq said System as It affects the employees of - Publlc Agency; not including the costs of special valuations or of the partodlc lnvutlgation and valuatlone, required by lam, d. A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable In one In- stallment as the oecastons arise; to cover the costs of special valuations on account of employeea of Public Agency, and costs of the Perlodlc Investigation and valuations required by law. 9. Contributions required of Public Agency and Its employees shall be subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to -the Public Employee$- letlteitent Law, and on account of the experience under the Retireaent System as determined by the periodic Investigation and valuation required by said Retirement Law. 10. Contributions required of Public Agency and Its employees shall be paid by public Agency to the Reticaasnt System within thirty days after the and of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed by Board regulation. if more or less than the correct amount of contributions is paid for any perlod, proper adlusteent at-All be made in connection with subsequent remittances Adjustments on account of actors In contrlbutlons required of any employee may be etch by direct payments between the employee and the Board. B. This Amendment shall be efts Don the BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC ENPLOYEPS- RETIR SYSTEM . yv� BY ASSISTANT BRECIfl'IVE OFFICER �Q5 Q� PERS- CON -702 (AMENDMENT) (Rev 6/98) 108 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAW1 BY Presiding Officer �� Rltnu Dato y�� Cie day of a ORDINANCE NO. 373 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIONGA. CALIFORNIA. MODIFYING CHAPTER 10.56 OF TITLE 30 OF THE RANCID CUCAH:NGA HINICIPAL CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR THE DESIGNATION OF UNRESTRICTED TRUCK ROUTES. RESTRICTED TRUCK ROUTES. AND 'DESIGNATION OF TERMINAL ACCESS ROUTES FOR E7CTRA -LARGE SWICKS ' POLLOWD: THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT7 OF RANCHO CICAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS SECTION 1: Chapter 10.56 of Title 30 of the Rancho Oucamonga Municipal Coda is hereby repealed. A new Chapter 10.56 in hereby added to scid Code to read, in words and figures, as follows: "Chapter 10_56 "TRUCK ROUTES AIM RESTRICTIONS "Sections: "10.59.010 Unrestricted truck routes. "10.56.020 Restricted truck routes. 010.55.030 Terminal access routes for extra large trucks. "10.56.040 Penalties. "10.56.050 Civil remedies available. "10.36.010 Unrestricted truck routes. "A. F:cept as herein: at provided, or as otherwise provided by law, commertial vehicles and vehicle combinations described in Sections 35400 and 35401 of the California Vehicle Code, or their successor provisions, and vebirles which exceed a mazisum gross weight of three (3) tone, my be oper,,ted cay on streets designated as "unrestricted trod routes". Unrestricted truck routes in the G:ty include: "1. All streets within th3 area defined by the City Industrial Area Specific Plan as the "Industrial District". limits. "2. Highland Avenue from Haven Avenue to the out City "3. Ease Line Road front the vest City limit■ to the east City limits. 10 r I Ordinance No. 373 Page 2 i _ "4. Foothill Boulevard from the vent City limits to the ~ :µl east City limits. L ^5• Arrow Route from Cucamonga Creek to the seat City r limits. � ^6. Street from the vest City limits to Vineyard d Eighth Avenue. ' "7. Fourth Street frm the vest City limits to the n¢at City limits. t. wg, prove Avenue from 8tb Street to Foothill Boulevard. 09. Vineyard Avenue from 8th Street to Foothill Boulevard. "10. Archibald Avenue from 4th btrest to pootbill Boulevard. ` ^11. Haven Avenue from 4th Street to State Route 30. ^12. Milliken Avenue from 4th Street to State Route 30. "13. Day Crook Boulevard from Rochester Avenue to State Route 30. 4 ^14. Erivanda Avenue from 4th Street to yoothill Boulevard. "15. East Avenue from Poothill Boulevard to State Route 15. ^B, The provisions of this section may be enforced when an- signing designating where the City Traffic Engineer has provided unrestricted truck routes. ^C, Ertra -large trucks, an defined in Section 10.56.030, may operate only on the routes designated in said section. ^D. fficeptione. "1. Nothing in this ^action shall prohibit the ingress and egress from a designated unrestricted truck route by vehicles and City street vbeu vehicle combinatlona described herein onto a of making pickups or deliveries of goods, necessary for the purpose on merchandise from or to any building or structure tlocated veree and a City street. or for the p•mposo of delivering materials or {I in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration. rmodcling a City street for which construction of any building or structure upon a building permit has prmiounly baen obtained. Ordinance No. 373 x Page 3 "2. The provisions of thin section ahall not apply to as 4 v passenger bus under the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission or any public entity, or which Sex owned by a bua company licensed by the City, or to any vehicle owned by a public utility while necessarily in use in the construction, installation or repair of any public utility, or to any vehicle owed by the City, or a City 'rr contractor, while necessarily in use in the construction, installation or repair of or on City property. "3. T'ae provisions of this section shall not apply to any ' City licensed refuse hauling vehicles while picking up refuse, waste or garbage pursuant to such license. "10.56.020 Restricted truck mutes. Y "A. Section 35401(d) of the California Vehicle Code allows any city, upon finding that certain streets cannot safely sustain the $ operation of trails' or aemi- trailers having the maximum kingpin to 6 rearmost axle diets iaraltted under Section 35400 of raid Code, to 7 restrict the one of - -_h streets by trailers or semi - trailers having a aQicum kingpin distance as determined. certain Ctty streets have boom datermited to be able to safely accommdata a naimum such ' distance of thirty -eight (38) f"et. Ercapt as otherwise provided by law, trailers and sesii- trailers havrag a kingpin to rearmoat axle distance in excess of tbirty -eight (38) feet are prubiblted from using the aforadeseribed streets. The streets described in this section shall bn known as "restricted truck routes ". Reatricted truck routes in the City includes "1. 19th Street from the vent City limit to Raven Avenue. 02. Vineyard Avanue from Voothill Boulevard to Carnelian Street. "3. Carnelian Street from Vineyard Avenue to State Route 30. "4. Archibald Avenue from Yootbill Boulevard to State More 30. "B. The provisions of this section may be enforced when and where the City Traffic Em8lno r has provided signing �4aeigoatiog restricted truck routes. "10.56.030 Terminal access routes for extra -large trucks. "A. Except as otherwise provided by law, truck- tractors and ami- tractors, and truck - tractors, smi- trailers and trailers, which exceed any of the sire limitations set forth in Sections 35400 and 35401 of the California Vehicle Code or their successor provisions. � f t .5::i)c• i Ordinance No. 377 ' Page 4 v Z. and which are mmpted from ouch liwitations pursuant to Section 15401.5(a) of said Code, may be•operated only on streets designated as "terminal access routes ". Cuch tractor-trailer combinations my be operated on terminal access routes only for the purpose of accessing facilities vhurs freight is consolidated to be shipped or where fall load conaig @Ants may be off — loaded or at which the vehicle combinations are regularly maintained, stored or manufactured. "City street# designated as terminal access routes aret "1. All streets within the Industrial District.' "2. Foothill Boulevard from the vest City limits to the oust City limits. 03. Fourth Street form the vest City limits to the east City limits. "4. Archibald Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Arrow Route. "B. The provisions of this suction may be enforced what* the City Traffic Engineer has provided signing designating terminal access routes." 10.56.040 Penalties. "It shall be unlawful for any parson, firm, partnership or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter. Any parson, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision of thin Chapter or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of an infraction and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable as followst "A. A fine not exceeding One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for a first violation= "B. A fine not exceeding Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for a' second violation occuring within one (1) year: "C. A fine not mceeding Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each additional violation occuring within one (1) year. "Each such person, firm, partuership, or corporation shall be demad guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership, or corporation, and shall be domed punishable therefore as provided in tbis Chapter. •a !f 6f�Y�fy] :�jef'�4tM'v' IS, V ` r ... �:j.a el'S:i^'Ni43Y ♦{,.{L.ip F1413 Crdinance No.'y373'• Cr ' Page Si °The provisions of this Chapter shall knot be construed as Permitting conduct not proscribed herein nod Abell not af".ct the' enforceability of any other applicable provision of 1". "10.56.050 Civil ramedias available. "A violation of � any of - the provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process, by means of restraining ordor, preliminary or - permanent injunction, or in any other meaner provided by, lm for the abatement of such nuisance." SECTION 2. The' City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction. or by reason of any yremptive lefislation, the renaming provisions, section: paragraphs, sentences, and words of thin Ordinance shall remain in full force and affect. Y; SECTION 3s The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the mama to be published within fifteen (15) days after its pea lags at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Cntaria. California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. California. I f CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 MEL. TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENYIRONWMTAI ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88 -01 - cbents r ^ ar ng neon signsaanduwlndcw signs. of W-31ed from August 17, 1988 meeting) I. REC"ENDATION: Staff recommends that this item be continued to a er io allow staff to continue working with the Chamber of Commerce on revised language. 11. ANALYSIS: The City Council conducted a special workshop meeting wTV - "{-Chamber of Commerce on August 31, 1988. The results of that workshop are presented below. In addition to the issue of neon and window signs, a number of other concerns were discussed. The Council indicated that programs should be developed to educate business owners mn how to effectively advertise. The Council seminareforhthe busines person with nod t idde expertnadviceoonohow to Chamber etoe continue ndeveloping a businesscdirectory nofuga9ds and uervicer provided within Rancho Cucamonga. Staff will give an pdate at the meeting on these programs. A. Neon Siyns: The Council askryd staff to modify the amendment to names aT a cart oflInteriorr(wlndow) neon slgnodisplays. The size should be 3 -4 square feet maximum in addition to the 2 square foot generic name neon signs, however, the combined total should not exceed 4 square feet. B. Window Signs: The Chamber objected to limiting window signs to Only commercial zones. The examole was given of A business located in an Officeaor aindutst iiai camplsx. Thedconsensusaof the Council was to modify the amendment to give greater flexibility to allow window signs for quasi - commercial uses in industrial /office areas. There was also a consensus to eliminate the permit process for window signs. The Chamber expressed concern with the proposed language which 'encouraged" // � W: 't:.i4`_ . / y ;'i'; �i +ten ^; CI cauri„1t,srn��REPORr RE: SIGN OiL1INANCE AHENOMENi September 21, 1988r - Page 2' 1} r, paper stgns,to,be mounted in hanging frames. Council indicated that this was targ_•,ed at the story chains m.�1th weeknv, adrertlsing campaigns and was intended to discourage the use..of masking tape to hang windN signs. Staff suggested that the language could be modified to encourage the use of a "fastening device . C. Real Estate S1 ns: The Chamber of Commerce resented a seven- .p n proposa , allow 'Open NNW real estate signs within the public right -of -way and mod, `y the existing regulations for., on -site Open House signs (see attached Exhibit "A "). Staff expressed concern with the legal implications of &,towing only certain types of signs within the public right -of -way and the Potential safety hazard created by improper placement,of these signs. nh cae uiuj raP anning Commission level because t sb of real estate signs was not discussed during their previous hearings. Res fully fitted, / Bra City Planne BB:OC :ko Attachments: Exhibit 'A" - Chamber of Ccmmerce Proposal Resolution of the Planning Commission Recommending Approval Ordinance .9 Y_ POSED CUANGES TO RANCHO CUCAMONGA SIGN ORDINANCE FOR REAL ESTATE "OPEN HOUSE" SIGNS 1) "OPEN HOUSE" Big" and flags may be used on Saturdays ad Sundays OnY, but NOT on holidays. 2) One off -site "OPEN HOUSE" sign may be placed in the ;e -, public rightb£ -way, at each of any two intersections in the e a third sign will be permitted if the louse to be held open in PP" t an a cul- de -avc. 3) Permission moat be obtained f--or the, homeowner upon vhone property the agent wishes to Place the "OM HOUSE" sign prior to ptucement of the sign. 4) Three flags and one additional "OPEN HOUSE" sign may be placed in front of the hone being held open. S) Flags are permitted only upon the property being beLt open. 6) "OPEN HOUSE" signs or flags are NOT permitted upon any canter median strip on any street or highwa; in the City. 7) -Signs or flags may NOT be placed is such a tacatian as to interfere with the passage of pedestrian, equestrian or vehicular traffic. • i RESOLUTION NO. 88 -97 _ r A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SIGN ORDINANCE AMENOMZNT 88 -01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCN'1 CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR NEON AND WINDOW SIGNS WHEREAS, on the 11th day of Nay, 1988, tht Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following t�i9s: 1. That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban cummunity within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations, and 2. That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City; and 2. That the Amendment will pror de for the construction. Improvement, or extension of transportation facilities, public utilities, and public services required with the District. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found teat this pro ect w not create a significant adverse effect on the environxent and recommends to City Council the issuance of a Negative Declaration o II, 1588. n May NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamnga hereby recommends approval of Sign Ordinance Amendment 88- 01. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Sign Ordinance Amendment 88 -01 to modify the Municipal Code per the attached Ordinance. _ �.�e��- �FFs•i. §�++CS, ^iF']M7�M1 _5�. �t �. _'_. _ _ ... - d..... . PLANNim OMMISSION.RESOLUTION- RE: SIGN; ORDINANCE N0. .3 5� AN oRDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGH ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88 -01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR NEON AND WINDOW SIGNS AND ADDING PROVISION FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS FOR CITY SPONSORED SPECIAL EVENTS follows: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as SECTION 1: Section 14.08.030 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows, n wor s and graphics: 14.08,030 Area of sign. "Area of sign' shall be computed by including a en re area within a single, continuous, rectilinear perimeter of not more than eight straight lines, or a circle or an ellipse, enclosing the extreme limits of the writing, representation, emblem, or other display, together with arty material or color forming an integral part of the background of the display or used to differentiate the sign from the backdrop of structure against which it is placed, but not including any supporting framework or bracing tha is clearly incidental to the display itself. In the case of a two - sided, multi- sided, or three dimensional sign, the area shall be computed as including the maximum single display surface which is visible from any ground position at one time. N. `Cana a<w ��9 i WBIVIDUAL LCT(Ea Baw i8Ca1p7) Can'­ Nrr:ir.r BIDNU)UAL LLTrrs Siam 01:2 I P4rIn4► alas WRU SAUX RJt •'U Deterjoini Lg Sigil Areas 4 eyl' -w...f 6 ¢' L- �.✓-: �4... �f• J� \.l�Sa^,¢.'�l:lL'�Ky"jCy�ij `t• Clrt COUNCIL OROINANCE.NO. ` ' RE: SiGN ORD. AMEND. 88- 01.x". Page 2; „ c „v_} iti SECTION 2: Section 14.08.380 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as _i follows: 14.08.030 Window si n. "window sign" means a sign painted, attached, or located within three feet of the )- glued, or a enr se a zed a window interior side of the window or otherwise easily visit o r xn the exterior of the building. SECTION 3: Section 14.20.070 of Chapter 14..- is amended to read as follows: 14.20.070 Neon signs-7 exterior. Neon tubingraay be permitted as a signs and wall signs subject to the sign mat erial n exterior monument ' following provisions: A. Permitted only in the more intense commercial zones: Community Commercial Regional Related Commercial - Regional Commercial B. prohibited. be fully overedswith fully enclused in plexiglass. C. Within shopping centers, neon signs may be allowed only as part of a Uniform Sign Program. D. Such signs shall be limited to business identification only, and may incluce graphic symbols. SECTION 4: Section 14.20.071 is added to Chapter 14.20 to read as follows: 14.20.071 Neon si ns - interior. Neon tubing may be permitted as a subject to the following provisions: sign mater a or n er or w n ow s gns A. Permitted in commercial zones only; B. No more than one neon window sign shall be permitted per business. d C shsign feet ineheight a;ovee finished grade. 0. Such signs shall be limited to generic messages, such as "OPEN" or "PIZZA ". N.: product advertising or business identiflcatio:, is allowed. CITY COUNCIL OROINA.NCE No.' RE: SIGN ORD. MEND..88 -01 Page 3 ` follows: SECTION 5: Section 14.20.080 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as 14.20.080 Permitted si ns - Residsntlal Zones. The fcilowing signs may be perm to n e res en a zones su ec o e provisions listed: (Chart remains unchanged) SECTION 6: Section 14.20.100 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as follows: u 14.20.100 Permitted si ns - Commercial and Office Zones. The following s gns m4Y a perm to n e ca�orc a an o ce zones subject to P the provisions listed: E' (see revised chart attached) SECTION 7: Section 14.20.110 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as 2 follows: — ;` 14.20.110 Permitted si ns - Industrial Zones. The following signs may be perm n e n ustr a zones su ec a provisions listed: (Chart remains unchanged) follows: SECTION 8: Section 14.24.090 is added to Chapter 14.24 to read as 14.24.090 Sign color. Sign colors should be compatible with the building arcs ec re. n shrpping centers, sign color should compliment the color scheme for the center. The use of garish or flourescent colors is considered Inappropriate. SECTION 9: This Council finds that this amendment will not adversely effect the env ronment and herejy issues a Negative Declaration. Y;. lit - la "B ; !, JIN jtEa 8 a �'�� _ j aiaj3 3 ELg$ 6y 7�1 filial 9 jbx p"�Q 11 im, Is 3� Y�3yi MIN a s e a a s a� �8 at y all3 3 °. ]r •�i L �OL Cos C$_ a d dill IS.-a] to �# dici A3�s 2 7m;!z fng •.� c - a f- V I it jA s� iE s B a B s iR g lSgggg' �y$a ��' P B $Y B aY,18?SE <� 8 Pal zr c 9, 3th 5 .3�. I Is k �• �� �| f� \! 211 j !ƒ � q | pI a ! 4 i | f! | a| f if i ! .! |�! !■ ! � | lilt Is CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT N• DATE: September 21, 1988 _ TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIROMMJTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMDUENT 88 -05 'F RAXCHU-- ji S e es en a , Lion 17 ,18.040 B.Z(c)p, regarding development within the'Alqutst- priolo Special Studies Zone. F; I. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning COMIssion recommends approval of iFi s 7 em: a,•' II. ANALYSIS• This amendment was initiated by staff to clarify the cy s po icy for subdivisions within fault zones. Staff, with the a support of the Planning Commission, is- recommending that the Development Code be amended to.oliminate'conflicting- provisions and allow subdivisions within the Alquist- Priolo Special' Studies Zones Subject to geotechnical investigations. This would be consistent With the provisions of the Alquist- Priolo Act and Guidelines. The 1 attached staff report and minutes fully describe the proposed amendment. 4Re u11 it ed, er n BB:DC:ko Attachments: August 10, 1988 Planning Commission Staff Report ReAugolutioust no. 8888.159ing Commission Minutes Ordinance /J 4r m Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAYAONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 10, 1988 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cann:issfon FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT - amen en o ap er regarding development within thetAlqui t1Priolo Special Studies Zone. I. ABSTRACT• This is an admintstrative.revision to clarify the City's po cy or subdivisions within fault zones. II. BACKGROUND: The Alqutst- Priolr Special Studies Zones Act was enac e y the State to prohibit the location of most structures for human occupancy across the traces of active faults and to mitigate thereby the hazard of fault - rupture. Under the Act 'special studies zones" are mapped along known active faults, such as the Cucamonga and Red Hill Faults. Cities and counties affected by the zones must regulate certain development "projects" within the zones. The City mast withhold development permits for sites within the zone until geologic investigations demonstrate that the sites are not threatened by surface displacement from future faulting. III. ANALYSIS• The City's Gene-al Plan provides public disclosure of e 5pecial Studies Zones a.d contains general policies regarding development within the zones. The areas within Alquist- Priolo :.recial Studies Zones are designated as Hillside Residential District. The Development Code provisions for the Hillside Residential District contain specific geotechnical performance standards. lhere is an apparent conflict between two such standards. Sectfen 17.18.040 8.2 (a) states that: a) Any development or subdivision within the Alquist- Priolo "Special Studies Zone" or City- adopted "Special Studies Zone" shall conduct a geologic study in conformance with the roquirements of the Zone. This study shall be prep. ad by a certified engineering geologist. 1j G Y'` PLPVMIMG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT RE: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88-05 Page Conversely, Section 17.18.040 B.2. (c) prohibits "subdivisions" from the Zone: c) No subdivision, emergency facilities, community facilities, or places of general public assembly shall be permitted within the Alquist-Priolo Zone. Whereas, subparagraph (a) clearly permits subdivisions subject to a geologic report within the Zone, subparagraph (e) prohibits subdivisions outright within the Zone. To resolve this apparent conflict, staff compared the Development Code standards to the General Plan policies. Subparagraph (c) is an abbreviated version of a General Plan policy which states: 'Any major subdivision, emergency facility, or other type of structure that attracts numbers of people, is open to the general public, or provides essential community sery ices should not be permitted within an Alquist - Priolu Special Studies Zone, as shown in Figure V -3 ". This General Plan policy is intended to keep fire and police stations, schools, and places of general public assembly out of fault areas where they could be subject to significant damage and loss of life. The use of the term "major subdivision' is not sufficiently defined. The term has a very specific meaning under the State Subdivision Map Act to define subdivisions which create five or more parcels of land. However, the use of the adjective 'major' may relate to the latter reference to "other t1pe of structure that attracts numbers of people% with 'numbers , alto not being quantified. The Development Code subparagraph (c) avoids this issue by using the all- inclusive term "subdivisions°. Section 17.18.040 B.2. (c) modifies the General Plan language and refers to 'places" of general public assembly'. Under the Uniform Building Code, assembly area is defined as an area where 50 or more persons may assemble for worship, entertainment, dining, etc. Staff recommends that the Development Code be amended to allow subdivisions within the Alquist - Priolo Special Studies Zones subject to geotechnical investigations as required by the Alqulst- Priolo Act. This can be accomplished by deleting the reference to " subdivisiuns' from subparagraph (c) as shown in the attached Ordinance. IV. RECOKIIENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council of Development Code Amendment 88 -05. lJY 7 - I V — , K, yrc�- �V 1� -; -REPORT" MING. ISSIOW,STAFF- RE:'. DEVELOPMENT- -'CODE MEWMEhr 88 -05 Auguit 10; 1988"= Page 3 S ullyu el, BCity P7 ner BB:DC:ko Attactaents: Ordinance Resolution W49 Tama: I. 1 1 -7 Motion: Moved by Blakesley, seconded by Chitiea to approve the Resolution of Approval for variance 88 -11 as modified with the.added condition of bringing the elevatfcns to the Design Review Committee as a Consent Calendar item for approval. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAUSLEV. CHITIEA, MCNIEL. EMEAICK HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY -- carried : *•rr H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88 -05 - CITY OF amen3men ay r s e F. en e oRUO -n I7 137.90 8.2 (c) regarding development within the Alquist- Priolo Special Studies Zone. Dan Coleman, Senior Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel opened the public hoarfeg. Hearing none, the public hearing was closed. Comissioner Chitiea stated the she felt approval was appropriate action. Notion: Moved by Emerick, seconded by Chitiea, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Environmental Assesswnt and Development Cr�!e Amendment 88-05. The notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ZMERICK, CHITIEA, BLAKESLEY, MCNIEL NOES: COMYISSIONECS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY -- carried I. MODIF. �•.�� �• -vo - �ceaa nurs.a - A request to modiry the ons o pprova re r ng a installation of a median island within Terra Vista Parkway between Church Street and Town Center Drive for an office park at the southwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Church Street and a business park at the southeast corner of Terra vista Parkway amd Churcl: Street - APN: 1077- 421 -G6, 1077- 091 -17, 1011- 4 ?1 -06, 09, and IR. Barrge Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Planing Commission Minc:as Q -8- August 10, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 8B -158 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.18, OF THE RANCHO ;. CUCAMONGA MINICIPAL CODE REGARDING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN ALQUIST- PRIOLO SPECIAL STUDIES ZONE Y K 3 WHEREAS, on the 10th day of August, 1988, the Planning Commission ;5 held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the Califoria Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that 1, this aoenc6in will not create a significant adverse effect on the environment and recommends to City Counmll the issuance of a Negative Declaration on August 10, 1988. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65650 to 65855 of the California Goverment Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of this amendment. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve this amendment to the Municipal Code per the attached Ordinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS :0TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1988. PLANNING CON ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: �l C UrryA. MjWwr. Chauum- 1, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resoiltl0n war, duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 100 day of August, 1988, by the following rote- to -wi.: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, HC NIEL, BLAKESLFY HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOME ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY /3� 0 vy; ORDINANCE NO. /� ' . `� d7q. v .. • v AN ORDIRANCE•OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF'THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 'ANENDING TITLE 17; CHAPTER,17.18 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA NUNICIPAI: COMREGAROING OEYELOPNENT WITHIN TyE+ALQUIST- PRIOLO SPECIAL•STUOIES ZONE WHEREAS, on the 21st day of S2ptenber,`1988, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordsin as follows: , SECTION 1: Section.17.18.04.1 5.2. (c) is amended to read as follows: (c) No eawrgency facility; or other type of structure that rttracts or numbers cmauw nityfservices shall be pereittedewithinbthe,Alqui essential Studies Zone. " SECTION 2: Ttis Council finds that, this amendment will not adversely effect the en�ament and hereby issues a Aegative Declaration. 8 Ya:. , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: September 21, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Public Hearing for the purpose of hearing and passing upon objections or protests, if any, which may be raised by any property owners or other interested persons regarding the Notices of Construction that were posted September 8, 1988 on the property located at 10323 19th Street and the property located between 10301 and 10323 19th Street, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911. RECOMMENDATION: It is racomended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution pordering the City Engineer, actinq as Superintendent of Streets, to roceed with ocated at 1 323 19th Street, Street eimprovementps have not beeeen Installed o Olday4 after September 21, 1988, in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 19!1 and order the formation of an assessment district for APR Nos. 202 - 201 -54 and 202- 201 -72. UMGROUND /ANALYSIS: Since 19th Street between Hermosa jurisdiction of Caltrans, the City negotiating a fair and equitable exc cost, as noted in the attached memo has stated that this could unfortunately, to satisfy Caltrans fully funding it, the City must fi conduct a Public Hearing for asses (Chapter 27). and Cartilla Avenues is under the cannot follow its normal steps of hange of street improvements for land randum dated July 29, 1988. Caltrans constitute coercion. Therefore, on this project, even though we are fir post the properties involved and sment proceedings for the 1911 Act On September 8, 1988, the attached "Notices to Construction' were posted in front of the property located at 10323 19th Street and the property located between 10301 and 10323 19th Street. These Notices were posted in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911 and order the installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drive approaches, street trees, street lights, base pavements, street pavements, grading, clearing and grubbing and all other incidentals /3,01- CCSR `f September 21, 1.989 Page 2 0 'a �1 t therewith. The property owners are instructed that -they are given ,60 days from thapdate of epactment of„tbe larder to' construct' to construct said improvements. ;. After Uw' b0' deys shall expire, the City Engineer, acting as the Superintendent of Streets will cause the improvements to be constructed and the'propepty owners will be assessed for all the costs introduced Wain the ;correspodding.property 4rogtages. The costs will be paid from the fmaation of an assessment district which will include the above mentioned APM Ntmbers.'- Upon hearing protests or objections, it any, at the public, hearing, Councti is requested to make a ruling and directive to staff regarding pvttests and cake directive to the VI Engineer, acting as tie Superintendent of Streets, to proceed with the said improvements, if such have not been constructed by November 21, 1989 and to further order the 'ornatior. of an assessment district which will include the listed parcels to pay for said impro� ments. Respe t 1i,vubmitted, R101:MM:pam / Attachments: resolution Memorandum dated July 29, 1988 /33 i / RESOLUTION HO. 0o%_ 16% A RESOLUTION OF-THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY,OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10.123 19TH STREET AND THE ;PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN 10301 AND 10323 19TH STREET, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES FOR STREETS ANT) HIGHWAYS SECTION 5870 THRU 5880 MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CHAPTER 27 OF IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 WHEREAS, on September 8, 1988, the City Engineer acting under the authority of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga had posted at the subject location a Formal Notice to Construct Public Improvements. WHEREAS, on this data September 21„ 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has met to hear all protests or objections from any interested parties tc the Order to Construct; and upon hearing all objections, resolves in the common interest of public health, safety and welfare for the City o° Rancho Cuawnga that public improvements be made on the properties fronting 19t:1 Street between Hermosa Avenue and Cartilla Avenue. ;i IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of Rancho S Cucamonga that the public interact requires an 'Order to Construct" street frontage rmprov+mznty consisting OF parking lane pavements, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ;ark#ay predfnqq. driva approaches and street lights and all incidentals the ^rto d conformance to the 'Standard Drawings' of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 1984 Edition with suppleeerts through 1987, with all plans and construction wort bwiry subject to review and permit by the Engineering Division of the Cowmnity Oavelo,aent Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. All work slid)] Commence within sixty (60) days of the execution of this resolution and If not commenced or provision made therefore to the satisfact'on of thl< City Council, the City Engineer, actingy as Superintendent of Streets, sball cause su:h construction to be made, and in pursuance to the statutes of the Catifornia Codes for Street and Highways shall proceed with actions to assess the costs theefore as tax lien upon that real property described as: Those lands situated in the State of California, County of San Bernardino and described as follows: APN He. 202 - 201 -54 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that portion of Parcel No. 1, as shorn on Parcel Map ie. 1519, as per plat recorded in Book 13, of Parcel Maps, Page 75, records of said County, lying North of a line 44 feet Southerly of and parallel to the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 35 in the City ,f l3� t Resolution No. September 21, 1988 Page 2 y Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California. cContaining 3640 square feet more or less. APR No. 202 - 201 -72 LEGAL DESCRIPTION �'r• All that portion of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section Y 35. Township 1 North, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian lying Northerly of a line 44.00 feet Southerly of and parallel to the North line of the Southeast ?y Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of,. said Section 35 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, of the following #} described land: Cj That portion of Parcel No. 2 of Parcel Map No. 1519 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as per map filed in Book 13, Page 76 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County bounded as follows: On the West by the West line of said Parcel 2; on the North by the North line of said Parcel 2; on the East by the East line of said Parcel 2 and its Southerly prolongation; on the South by the Northerly line of a 60.00- foot strip of land lying 30.00 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning at the intersection of the cencerline of Hamilton Street and the West line of Tract No. 9345 as shown on the map of Tract 9345 in said City, filed In Map Book 132, Pages 27 and 28 in said Records Office; Thence South 89045'33' West 4.59 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southerly having a radius of 1703.53 feet and a central angle of 5 66'08 "; Thence Westerly along said curve, an arc distance of 176.48 feet to the beginning of a reverse corve concave Northerly having a radius of 1775.23 feet and a central angle of V41'42% Thence along said reverse curve, an arc distance of 176.45 feet to the West line of said Parcel 2. Containing 2339 square feet more or less I� /3.5- ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM Date: July 29, 1988 To: Mayor, Members of the City Council Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engfnee 8y: Mike Olivier, Seniar Civil Engineer Subject: R/W Acquisitions in State HfgSweys When it is required to take WW to widen an existing street, the City usually follows these steps: I. Conduct neighborhood meeting. 2. City negotiates a fair and equitable exchange of the street faproveeents for the iand cost based on an evaluation of improvement versus land cost. 3. If negotiations fail, the City proceeds with the following: b. HHatitas aand Hearing for Condemnation c. Posting and Hearing for assessment proceedings in accordant& with Chapter 27 of the Improvement Act of 1911. 4. Negotiations continue Varailel with Item 3 until resolved by settlement or legal action. However, when acquiring RN for a State Route, Csltrans has steted that the above practices constitute coercion and that possibly any contact Cwith a property owner before a full Offer for tho property is ads could elt�ansfon oursprojects involving State Routes Mem ltyhough we�fulty fund them) we plan to do the following: 1. Appraisals 2. Posting and Hearing for assessment proceedings for 1911 Act (Chapter 27), We will use this hearing to er.Plafn to the ppeople the 1911 Act and what is guidelines. happening without violating any Ca trans 3. Conduct neighborhood meeting regarding the project details only. 13( L t W tiff - x•,22 a R/W AZOOISITI NS IN STATE HIGHWAYS JULY , 1968 PAGE 2 4• Nake direct offers to purchase the r+. :c ^/W ftr appppra'sed --,n aaburtt. Hopefully, after the Public y ind netghborhood J mv:tlf"g- the property owners tnttlat: a ,eagon of bo far s rollef of assessment. Caltrans would W4 construe. this Lo be coercion. , � 5. Negotiations continue fn accordence with Item 4' ntil solved by settlement or laga1 action. resolved Until the hearing far assusemnt proceedings for the 411 Act (Chapter the a State Route R/N or negotfatlon Procedures_bw,ause dlscussian_of these utters could 'be construed , by Caitrano to be coarcllo or solicitation for a donation of-AtW. RFW:NO:dlw cc: Jack Las, Assistant City Manager / 37 — CITP OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1988 _ TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Monte Pr3schor, Public Works Engineer SUBJECT: Reconsideration of proposed Drive Approach at 8362 Hillside Road, submitted by Cheryl Ramirez (returned from July 6, 1988) RECD N3MTIOK: Reconsideration of drive approach located at 8362 Hillside Road as shown on revised plan submitted with application for Construction Permit. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS At the regular City Council meeting of July 6, 1988, Mrs. Ramirez appealed to the City Council staffs decision not to issue a permit for a drive approach at the subject address as shown on the 1 in submitted with the application at that tire. The motien failed 3 to 2. The resulting action was to have Mrs. Ramirez present new plans and for the item to cam back to the City Council for reconsideration. Mrs. Ramirez and her architect after working with staff has prepared a revised Plan taff have Creviewed threconsideration final revised plan and finds itgtoemaddress soeetofnthe concerns that were brought up at the Council meeting of July 6, 1966. Although, staffs original positions robins unchanged. the revised plan does appear to meet all the necessary criteria as well as can be expected with ove exception: The revised plan does not address the removal o, the existing drive approach and driveway. However, the above can be accomplished through the permit issuance process. Therefore. if City Council approves the proposed drive approach location, staff recommends that the approval be contingent on the following conditions necessary to be consistent with the current Development Code: o Construction Permit for proposed drive approach will necessitate the removal of the existing drive approach and related work. o Building Permit for garage conversion will necessitate the removal of the existing P.C.C. driveway in addition to any other Building Permit requirements. O1 s muted, Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 17, 1988 T0: Members of the City Council and City Manager FRDM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: William J. Silva, Deputy City Engineer SUBJECT: REPORT OR MAIMTEMARCE COST FOR WINDROW TREES During discussion of the Tree Preservation Ordfnancr at the City Council meeting of August �3, 1988, staff was directed bi develop an upatad wilimsumprfzt thesestimated oasts of windrow maintaining existing windrows which are preserved with. development, and maintaining windrows which are planted to re-e.:tablish windrows which are removed. In developing an estimate for the annual cost per tree to service and maintain Eucalyptus windrows several considerations were addressed. All work necessary to preserve existing windrows, including trfwin , protection and irrigation, and appnaare- establishing new windrows will be maintenance. responsibility t eees would obey mpalntaincd on aryregularepbasis and scheduled for major servicing every three years to prune and shape for optimum growth and public safety. The estimated cost per tree for this program was based upon the historic costs experienced by the City in recent years. Based on the currant tree triming contract rates, cost of a uipment required, personnel requirements, and administration of a landscape maintenance district for windrow trees, the estimated average annual cost for windrow tree maintenance is $110 per tree. This estimate is based upon the establishment of a 'public windrow easement" along all windrow plantings to provide adequate right -of -way for accessibility of equipment and working area for control of limbs during the tree trimming maintenance process. These same criteria would apply to windrows which are preserved as well as windrows which are re- establfshed, to provide for •tie ultimate maintenance of full grown windrow plantings. M ;( w. CITY C ►IKDROw;iREES: _ AUGUST 17,-,.1988' PAGE 2 In a recent subdivision .approved for the- Allmark Company (north. of Highland - Boulevard,, east- of Etiwanda Avenue, approximately 5:0tfeee�of windrows were%. preserved within the, development. In ,addition, approximately4 ;S00_;feet,of;,wlndrows,were; required "to be re- established with new plantings. Trees in;wfndrows• are _typically planted atdnteroals of eight to tenlfa et:' ,•tThirafor*i- -then_ could ;be, as many as 125_ trees within a windrow;S,000JeotMn length.` In.- the.Alimark-traet" there will be apProximetely5a.•total'of-6,070 fat of'wlndrm:planting' which will contain approxfmate1y6:0'•treai; If these 4trees. were* to be" maintained within a 'public.-fit Brow easement' the maintanance cost-would be approximately $88 000 ,'per year,.."- This particular. subdivision, Tract 12670, contains -97 Jots;, . therefore if these lots were assessed .,for windrow tree maintenauce the assessment would be approximately $1,300'p`er year per lot. , Although during the 'early years of maintaining re- established windrows the maintenance work is somewhat different,than that of maintaining the larger ostablished windrows, the intensity of attention needed to insure survival of the new-plantings and establish vigorous growth, including replacement and staking of new plantings, maintenance of irrigation systems, and placement of organic mulch to retain moisture,requires siailiar expense -as the fully established windrow. Respe ubmitted, Attachment I t� .! 1 -� �tttl,t• y OL8Z[ ON M1Z�Y.B� �11'�fY, ��llLAAO Yet. w.. •• Yw.�u. C• '»lmnt d \'IC 3.\ISV.GN3Z' � NYId b315YN 33b1 1 i t E t l j, 'F i Y 1 i t E t l j, 'F i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1989 T0: Mayor and Hecbers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A BEAU [If ICA PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE SITE OF THE HAVEN AVENUES buUMM I. RECOR4ENDATIOH: mm The Historic Preservation Commission recccaends F re Council deslgnatp the site of the Haven Avenue Beauttfleat'on Project as a Point of Historic Interest. The Commission also recoramands that a row of the Incense Cedars removed from tho median bo planted along the parkway on the west side of Haven Avenue between Banyan Street and Amber Lane and a rock monument with an explanatory plaque be installed at one end of the row of trees. II. BACKGROUND: This item came to the attention of the Commission with a reques from Councitmember Wright to consider the site as a point of historic interest because the final phase of the new landscaping improvwnts on Haven Avenue are about to be undertaken and the last of the remaining Incense Cedars planted in the medians by the Women's Club and many other volunteers will soon be removed. The Beautification Project can be viewed as a symbol of the Community spirit that existed prior to incorporation. The time, effort, and public - spiritedness of the many individuals and groups that contributed to the Project can be commemorated with a point of interest designation and with a plaque and trees placed in an appropriate spot. IIi HISTORIC PRESERVATION C"ISSIOH ACTION: The Commission voted 5 -0, m ers a sen , o recanmen es gnation of the site of the Beautification Prr 2ct as a Point of Historic Interest. They also voted to recommem m adoption of a scheme suggested by engineering staff to place a row of about 16 of the Incense Cedars along the parkway on the west side of Haven Avenue between Banyan Street and Amber Lane which will screen the stormwater catch basin to the west and beautify the parkway, and to place a rock monument at one end of the raw in a place where pedestrians can see ft. �r e ->.rt f• HAVEN AVENUE '-4" — ;, ': -' , " September' 21; 1988' Page 2 4r •J ; Y� i• A The Co�issfonseli discusseC n gosslble future phdsa'of this' a proposal whtchlwoiild.contlnue the row,of Darkt"y trees to.the f•' (perhaps down;to =Base Line Road)'anE place a rock aonueent,fn h ;... more preminent' and readily, accessible spot fur0 r_south: However;' this future'Phaserwould1be` dependent on drainageaagroveaants that' provided a S eable; parkway, }y! r Res fully Witted, 7 City anner is BB:AB:mlg Attachments: Staff Report with Photographs, Tree and Plaque Concopts Minutes Site Map Resolution e ->.rt a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 4, 1988 TO: Chairman and Meabers of :he Historic Preservation Coarlisslon FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BV: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE SITE OF THE HAVEN AVENUE BEAU] IFMAT10-- I. SITE LOCATION AIM DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The site of the Haven Avenue Beautification Project i along the medtai strip from Foothill to Nilson. The first 100 trees that were planted, Incense Cedars, were fiaced along the sides of Haven Avenue above Chaffey College. When it was decided that Haven was to be a divided road, this same species of tree was planted in the median, ultimately all the way down to Foothill Boulevard. Currently there is a row of the large trees in the median island between Banyan and Haber lane. They will be removed, as have the other Incense Cedars along Haven, and replaced with the lush landscape materials that nnv characterize this street, one of the most important in Rancho Cucamonga. 8. Land Uses Zontn and General plan Des1 nations The site 1s us as a con er v e al_ separa s ii> ei—o sides of the street. Center dividers provide for greater safety, beauty, and shade. For the purpo -es of this report, it 1s not necessary to cite the land uses and designations along the entire :ength of the site except to state that they are quite varied. Along the way are commercial, office professional, and neighborhood commercial uses and designations; low, medium, and medium -high residential, a park and flood control areas. Adjacent to the proposed site for the transplanted Incense Cedars is a stormwater catch basin. "Le , HPC STAFF REPORT HAVEN AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION August 4, 1988 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. Back round - Current: This item was requested to be put on the agen a y unc member Pamela Wright who is interested in citizens Voluntarilyibundertookdthe�task eof beautifying Haven Avenue when they planted and cared for hundreds of Incense Cedar trees, first along the right -of -way and later in the median island. Kew that the City is improving Haven Avenue with new median islands, landscaping, and sidewalks, Councilmember Wright thinks it is an approppriate Lima• to commemorate earlier efforts and if possible to incorporate some of these trees into the landscaping along the parkway. The trees will not be left in the median because the City has adopted a new landscaping plan and the trees present a visibility problem. B. S1 nificance: Although the Haven Avenue Beautification Project was undery 4 Ten just under 20 years ago, it is a project of importance in the City's past and worthy of consideratinn as a Point of Historic Interest and well worth commemoration as a model of public spirit and cooperative effort. The tree planting was spearheaded by Santina Cherbak and her daughter, Virginia Cherbak Adkins. At Virginia's suggestion, the Cucamcnga -Alta Loma Woman's Club, of which she was president in 1969 and later conservation chair, voted to sponsor the project. Other people and organizations also got Involved, contributing both time and money. Cedar Incense were chosen because the Cherbaks had found them especially hardy on their mountain property. The first 100 trees were planted along the sides of the sireet; at first holes were dug by hand, but Elmer and Florence Ruth Williams used their backhoe and lightened the workload. Virginia and her husband Les Adkins used Alfred Cherbak's truck every two weeks during the hottest months to carry water to the seedlings. Unfortunately, many of these small trees rere stolen and then all were consumed by the fire of October, 1970. The project was begun again, this time from trees first established in a tree farm in Santini Cherbak's back yard and planted in shallow sumps that had been bulldozed out in order to allow for watering the trees by flooding the sumps. Five hundred outdated 9- gallon garbage can smudge pots were donated by Art and Catherine Bridge in which to plant the trees, and Victor, Jr. and Alfred Cherbak got soil from foothill siltbeds to fill the cans. The 100 destroyed trees were replaced by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Conservation Department and Santina and Victor Cherbak donated 300 more. Woman's Club %1.J UPC STAFF REPORT HAVEN AVME BEAUTIFICATION August 4, 1988 Page 3 volunteers punched holes in the cans, and planted the trees in them. Santina cared for the trees on the tree farm for three years and then helped to plant them in the median along Haven Avenue in 1973. She was then over 80 years old. The William's backhoe was put to use again, the Bridge's truck hauled the trees, the ChaffeY College Foresters took away the debris from the planting site including cut up asphalt, and then volunteers from the Boy Scouts, Alta Loma Chamber of Commerce, Girl Scouts, Explorers, Foresters, and Lion's Club all pitched in for the planting while the Woman's Club served refreshments. Trees were planted from Wilson to 19th with pyracantha between the trees. The trees received donated water from a tunnel above the end of Haven Avenue belonging to Walter Leband. Albert Cherbak and Les Adkins installed pplastic pipe with drip outlets, much of it donated ?'/ Walter Le and, down to the trees with the help of volunteers. After two more planting occasions and donations by citizens for water meters, the trees and watering system extended down to Foothill. Bill and Laura Jones were instrumental in cutting several hundred stakes to brace the trees against the wind. For a year, the Adkins watched over the watering until the County and later the newly incorporated City took over. C. City Plans: Although the median: have been redesigned and re are n d aped, there are plans to commemorate the Beautification Protect. Possi' a schemes include the follnwing: 1. An explanatory plaque mounted on a rock or mortared rock next to the sidewalk on one side of Haven Avenue. 2. A cluster of the trees on the west side of Haven Avenue with an explanatory plaque in the middle. 3. A row of about 16 of the trees along the parkway on the west side of Haven Avenue that will double as a screen for the stormwater catch basin to the west. At the north end, (or possibly both ends), there would be a rock monument and plaque. There has been discussion that the Trails Committen may request an equestrian trail along this portion of Haven. The trail would likely preclude a sidewalk. IV. ELNIROhNENTAL ASSESSMENT: Designation of a Point of Historic n eres s exemp un er CEQA (Article 19 Section 15308). 14(,�> HPC STAFF_REPORT: ; - �:_' ' HAY EN AVENHE:BEAIITIFICATION - August 4, 1988 Page 4 1 V. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: -The site of the Haven Avenue 'Beautification ro ec 4ee - e criteria to the Ordinance as follows: A. Historic and Cultural Significant.: 1. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is connected with important• lual organizations and people. 2. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is particularly representative of a period and way of life. D. Architectural Slmntflcance: 1. The overall effect of tl.e uesign was beautiful. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setttne: 1. The proposed Point of Historic Interest to its location was an established and familiar visual feature of the City. VI. REC"EMATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation somns on recommend to the City Council designation of the site — the Haven Avenue Beautification Project as a Point of Histori.: Interest. Staff also recommends that the Commission recommend that and monument atoboth ends or the enddmostilikely to get theegreater amount of foot traffic and that a pedestrian path be included in the plans. Respectfully submitted, Henderso 4 Senior Planner LJH:AB :te Attachments: Site Hap Sketches of Schemes 1, 2, and 3 Resolutions lA1 7 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONNTCFiON T.ANgNARx SD -- Viev Looking, Date of Photo-7,a3zllm:--, Addrdes Viev Looking., Date of Photo _Page 1 of L Pages. LJH2 5 'L I n ii ,i 4 h it rt : I I I 1 I ji , : ALM& LoMpP I I 13ASIN I I 1 , : ;'• 3 AMaCp, ts.r.,s G NOMTH 0M1YIN1 OT I I�q n. . 1 '1 .: u 9 r; CCIMC-eFT A. HOWMENT ALOMS /I G Owc"FWT lb, - Mot4uMsHT W/IKEF-5 /.s-o PcltM A 11 H 11 11 11 11 �i h T f v AL.T.P IO LOMA IQ BASIN Ip �! .L to to III ' /p I � 11 1 i� G tvcan+ r rro ewe. QWYAN ST r_ 1 IEJ 1tee- 0.,+d %rlG�u me k�s� li It AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, COOPER, IIASKVITZ, ARNER, SCMMIDT y� ' `• NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE r. - N r�. ABSENi: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, STAMM t L. - canted B. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE 6858 HEINGS A HISTORIC LANDMARK OR POINT OF ij _ Arlene Banks, Associate Plann7ifthere d the staff report. Chairman Schmidt opened the ing. Hearing none, the hearing was closed. L Commissioner Haskvitz quests was any way to save the h ouse. Larry Henderson, Senior P anner, stated that the hcme is in poor condition and is not architecturaZrk gnificant. Motion: Moved by , seconded by Billings, to not designate 6858 Hermosa as a Historic Lan r Point of P,rstoric Interest. The motion carried by the following vo AYES: CO/MMISSIONERS: COOPER, BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, SCHMIDT, ARNER NDES: A MISSIONERS: HONE ABSENT: / COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, STA%" -- carried I. C. THE Arlene Banks, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Billings opened the public hearing. Councilmember Pam Wright stated that this project is symbolic of the community spirit that existed prior to incorporation. She stated that she felt the City would be remiss if they did not commemorate this somehow when the beautification is being done on Haven Avenue. She stated that she did not want to see it tucked away, but placing it in a prominent place i.e., Base Line and Haven, and /or Foothill Boulevard, at the shopping center on Haven. She stated that she did not want it to be a token monument. She requested HPC Minutes -2- August 4, 1988 _TJ sS °• that the Commission look at some of the other Important corners along Haven Avenue so the monument may.have 'more -visibility. .; X Commissioner Billings stated that this had originally started around Chaffey 1, College. He suggested putting a row of tees op there. He stated that this type of tree serves a purpose of, beautification and a shield for the basin. G Arlene Banks stated that the Commission could recommend this with an added condition of placing then in a highly visible spot accessible to pedestrians. Larry Henderson, Senior Planner, stated there is currently a problem with y extending this line of trees all the way to Base Line, since the parkway currently is used up by a drainage channel. If some day, a box channel is t constructed, the tree line could be extended. ,FK Commissioner Cooper stated that the corner of Foothill and Haven should tie l;+ into the Olive trees and the Mission Camp. She stated that she has no problem with coming down to Base Line. Hearing no further comments, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Haskvitz, seconded by Billings, to recommend approval of the site of the Haven Avenue Beautification project on Haven Avenue between Foothill and Nilson as a Point of Historic Interest and recommend approval of i 4> Phase I as recommended by staff to the City Council. The motion carried by r.. the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HASKVITZ, BILLINGS, ARNER, COOPER, SCHMIDT y NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE j "'4 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, STAMM - tarried D. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE VAN FLEET HOUSE. 8818 ARCHIBALD AVENUE. A HI5TORIC LANDMARK OR POINT OF HISTORIC- IRTERE51 — Z89= 071=/6 0 Arlene Banks, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Comnissionerskxitz questioned if there was a possibility to use this building as a theme a center. Larry Henderson stated that the hItectural styles are completely different. Chairman Scnaidt opened the oubllc hear 3 HPC Minutes -3- / August d, 1988 RESOLUTION NO. 00 S V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE SITE OF THE HAVEN AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT LOCATED IN THE MEDIAN ISLANDS BETWEEN FOOTHILL AND WILSON AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Cowfssion has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Point of Historic Interest Designation and issued Resolution No. 88 -15 recommending to this City Council that said Point of Historic Interest Designation be approved. WHEREAS, the City Council has recefvpd and reviewed all input from the Historic Preservation Coumission regarding said Point of Historic Interest Designation. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho ; aconga City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as i.i ows: SECTION I: The application applies to property located at the Haven Avenue me a31 iTands north of Foothill Boulevard. SECTION II: The proposed Point of Historic Interest meets the following crrfa established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Culturdl Significance: 1. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is connected with important local organizations and people. 2. The proposed Point of Historic Interest is particularly representative of a period and way of life. B Architectural Significance: 1. The overall effect of the design was beautiful. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed Point of Historic Interest In its location was an established and familiar visual feature of the City. 1'�4 nA CITY COUNCIL 'HESOLUiION HAVEN AVENUE BEAUTIFICATION- PRWECT Page 2 SECTION III: Designation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt from CFp c e , Section 15308): SIMON Iv: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this CbTss onn and based on the findings.set forth above, NON, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED; that the Rancho Cucamonga city Council does hereby approve designation of the Haven Avenue Beautification Project as a Point of Historic Interest. - 3, Y /55 } } CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA z STAFF REPORT DATE: September 21, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City rnuncil FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner f' BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner , SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE RELPH HOUSE 9468 LOMITA A i. I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommen6 Fa t e y ouncil designata the Ralph House as a landmark. II. BACKGROUND: This item came to the attention of the Commission when Ue -owner of the property contacted staff about having it designated as a landmark in order to increase the likelihood that it will be preserved. The house was built by Art and Lulu Relph sometime between 1921 and 1923. They raised their two daughters there (who now own the house) and participated in the growth and community life of Alta Loma. Art Relph ran Relph 's Garc3e and Service Station, which was located first next to the Alta Lama Citrus Association Packing House on Amethyst Streeu, later on the south side of Lomita west of Amethyst Street, and finally, in the late 1930's, just west of the house on the north side of Lomita where it still stands. Art Ralph built one of the Community's fire r as and serviced many of the others. Lulu Relph established th A.T.A. in Alta Loma. The house is a small but charming example of a Classical Revival Bungalow, which is in very good condition. III. Historic Preservation Garmission Action• The Commission voted 5 -0, 2 absent, to recommend that the Council designate the house as a landmark because it meets several of the criteria in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. AC R f ul d, d 8 anne BB:AB:mig Atachments: Staff Report Minutes Resolution CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Aft DATE: August 8, 1989 TO: Chairman and Hemmers of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SWECT: A PROPOSAL TO OESIGHATE THE RELPH HOUSE 9468 LOMIT 7IP'N: c - - I. SITE LOCATION, DESCRIPTION AND STATUS: A. Location: The Relph House is located at 9568 Lomita Avenue an a arge of of 1.19 acres. it is on the north side of the street west of Amethyst Avenue and within the area known as Old Alta Loma. B. Site Land Use Zoning and General Plan Designation: The lot con ns a s n9 a am y ousa w a garage a a been used as a workshop laundry /storage area, and a wood frame building that contained an automobile repair shop. Zoning is GC, General Commercial; General Plan designation is C mia(. C. Surramdtn Land Uses Zon1n and General Plan Desi notion: r - ng a am y res en a use; ---In zon g s ow Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre); South - Single family sresidential Low a Zoning is L, Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre); General East - Commercial ause; Zoning is GC,eGeneral Commercial; Nest - Singlet familyeSresidential Commercial is L. Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre); General Plan designation is Low Density Residential D. Description: This graceful one story tungalow is covered with narrow wood - clapboard and cornerboards. The symmetrical front facade features a small gabled portico and a charming, wisteria - covered pergola which stretches across the entire length of the shallow porch. The front door is bordered by a pair of full - length multi -paned sidelights and flamed by triple casement windows with four panes in the upper portion. The side- facing gabled roof is covered with asbestos /.5 7 HPC STAFF REPORT ` The Ralph House August B, 1908 Page 2 shingles. There Is a chimney on the east side. The house can be classified as a Colonial Revival bungalow because of its boxed eaves, gable return, accentuated front door, symmetrical facade, and columns which support the pergola. The automobile shop is a simple rectangular buildirg with lame corrugated metal doors over the bay openings. Behind tha {' garage is a shaded work areas. The lot has numerous peach, plum, fig, persimmon, and other fruit trees. E. Status: The status of the Relph House w; ::e 'list of potential Tandma cs is SUS, Surveyed Lndetemfned Status. II. ANALYSIS: A. Background• This item came to our attention when Crystal eyd w ose parents built the house, celled to inquire about the possitility of designating the house and garage a local landmark. Mrs. Goudey and staff have met several times and discussed her parents' role in the community; she showed staff old family pictures and talked about the date that the house was built. Mrs. Gcudey also gave staff a tour of the property. She and her sister now own the property and have put it up for sale. They would like to see the house preserved. B. Significance•: 1. Architectural: The house is a Classical Revival Bungalow in excellent condition. It is near other hL•ltoric structures in Old Alta Loma and contributes to the atmosphere of one of the few areas in Rancho Cucamonga with a collection of older buildings. The house is a ramin er of an earlier era. 2. Historic and Cultural: The house 1r significant because an important local family built and lived to it, the Relph.s, and the automobile repair shop, which also housed the city's fire truck was an important business establishment. According to A History of Old Alta Loma William Relph cave in 1901 from Kansa —to Wa-1 xas a amosa with the pioneer Dettweller family. William was married to one of the Oettweiler daughters. (Another daughter married a Schowatter.) Their sons arrived from Kansas later. In 1916, William bouoht land north of the stores on the east side of l5g r HPC STAFF REPORT The Relph House August 8, 1988 Page 3 Amethyst and built a garage and 'service station. In addition, he built and sold Relph Orchard Heaters. His son, Arthur, an excellent rrchonfc, took over the garage business. .Arthur and his wife Lulu purchased land on the north side of Lomita not far frm.,the service station cnd built a small structure where they lived until their home was completed. Crystal believes that the house was begun in 1921 and comp grew up in thleted "s Ir. 1923. She and her sister Prudence e house, their parents Arthur and Lulu spent their entire lives there. Arthur Relph ran the garage and service station at the Amethyst Avenue %cation until he had an accident that debilitated him for some time. The business was then run by Tom Monkman. During that period, in 1929, the business was moved to the south side of Lomita because the Alta Lima Heights Citrus Association Packing House was putting up a new building and needed space where the garage was located. Art Relph returned to the garage / sorvice station in the early 19301s; later in the 1930's the shop was moved to its current location next to the house. Art Relph was a volunteer fireman and served as the fire departiaent mechanic. He and tits wife were a :tively involved in coamunity life and also pursued creative and artistic interests. Lulu Relph, according to ter daughter Crystal, organized the first P.T.P, at the Alta Lmr Grammar School. The Relphs taught folk and square dancing Ni" many years and held dances upstairs at the firehall across tho street, at the corner of Lomita and Amethyst. They were also involved in ceramics, making their own bowls and cups, and Mrs. Relph painted and did weaving on her own loom. Fir. Relph designed a dehydrator and dried the many fruits that grew on their land. The Relphs were related to the Schowalter and Dettwo :ler - families•- also of interest is that Arthur Relph's maternal grandmother, born Rebecca Jane Adams, was the great granddaughter of John Adams, second president of the United States, and great niece of John Quincy Adams, sixth president. C. Relent Ci Policies: The General Flan mentions that a plan or va rev za on o d Alta Loma snould be undertaken. The General Plan recognizes the importance of preserving the City's heritage, especially in an area such as this. x.59 a HK STAFF REPORT The Relph House Auggustt 8, 1988 Pa 4 D. Issues: A major issue is whether a residence such as this can sure ve in a commercial area. Use of the Historlc +l Building ` Code should prove helpful whether a future owner wishes to keep the house as a residence or convert it to another use such as an office. Adoption of a code provision that would allow landmark structures to be considered conforming with respect to setbacks as long as the public health, safety and welfare are not endangered would be helpful in preserving structures such as this house. The Etiwanda Specific Plan contains this provision. w E. Environmental Assessment: Landlaar4 lgnatlon is exempt from c e r 5ection 15308). III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The Ralph House meets the criteria established as a guide in e storfe Preservation Ordinance - A. Historical and Cultural Signiffcance: 1, The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical period, style, and way of life. c ^. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark is associated with an important local family. 4. The proposed landmark was connected with a historical business. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood. IY. CORRESPONDENCE: Notice of this proposed designation was published n e a deport newspaper and notices were sent to owners withi —n ADD'Siii• has met with the co -owner of the property several times and has toured the property. Ae-0 HPC STAFF- RFP6RT The Relph House ";- V August 8, 1988 Pago 5 Y. RECOMIENDATION:' ASteff recommends that the Historic'Preservation' cmm ss on recomwe�d to the Ctty Council designation of The Ralph House 9468 Lemita, as a landmark because it meets the criteria established in the Ordinance. Respectfuliy'sutealtted, _ L. J. Henderson Senior Planner LN:AB:rc Attachments: Photographs Resolutions Site Location Map LAGNAND CITY CF RX.NCHO CLCA.%,ICX,�{A HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION. `P J- m F M b M t 7 t Al rl NORTH rrv-mf use- 9 Zcmi{n- TIT E- EXHIBiT, SCALE: -- ■ i PUBLIC HEARINGS -+ A. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE RELPH HOUSE 9468 LONITA A HISTORIC LANDMARK y. 4- Arlene Banks, Associate Planner, presenter the staff report. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. i Crystal Goudcy, representing the Ralph House, stated she was in favor .af the landmark designation. �. Hearing no further cat nt, the hearing was closed, Motion: Moved by Billingv, seconded by Cooper, to recommend approval of Historic Landmark Designation of the Ralph House, 9468 Lomita to the City Council. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, COOPER, UMVITZ, ARNER, SCHNIOT LACES: COMMISSIONERSS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS- BANKS, STAKM 1 Co3 d RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE RELPH HOUSE LOCATED AT 9468 LOMITA AVENUE AS A LANDMARK WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation CoaAission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all caanents on the proposed Landmark Designation and issued Resolution No. 88 -16 recommending to this City Council 1 that said Landmark Designation be approved. WHEREAS, the City Council has received and revi_wed all input from the Historic Preservation Comefssion regarding said Landmark Designation. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 0 NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows: $ SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor Parcel H er - 1 -15. a� t SECTION II: The proposed landmark meets the following criteria establisheil'Tniapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code: R A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative t of a historical period, style, and way of life. V 2. The proposed landmark Is an example of a typo of bull ding which was once cocoon but is now rare. ?. The proposed landmark is associated with an important local family. 4. fie proposed landmark was connected with a historical business. 6 Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed lagdaart materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2 The pproposed landmark In its iocation represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood. 0 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTIDN =KO RE: RELM HWSE'LANWM September 21, 1988 Page 2 SECTION III: Designation of a landmark 1s exempt. from CEQA !Article 19, Section . SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this aunt and based on'the.findings set forth above, NON, THEREFORE, BE IT;RESOLVED „that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve designation of The Rclph House as a landmark. l �s • 0—W! ! e4- . JAL ,: M I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council not accept r. g oc er s offer to donate the Fisher House to the City and to architecturally and shistoricallylImportantb and sit 1s ai notable feature on Etiwanda Avenue. II. BACKGROUND• At the City Council meeting of August 3, 1988, Mr. o er ocker spoke against landmark designation of the Fisher House, which he owns. The Council voted to continue the item so that a meeting with W. Flocker, a Councilmember, and staff could be arranged to discuss possible options. Councilmember Jeff King was appointed to serve on this subcommittee. The meeting took place on the porch of the Fisher House on Tuesday, August 9, 1983, at 5 :30 p.m. In attendance were Mr. Flocker, Mr. Hudson, Jeff King, Brad Buller, and Arlene Banks. Mr. Flocker's brother James Flocker joined the meeting at about 6:20 p.m. The meeting ended about 6 :55 p.m. III. DISCUSSION: Mr. Flocker said that he opposes landmark designation ecause a Someday wants to sell the property for development and thinks that the value is in the land, not In the house, and that the land is more valuable without the house than with it. He said that the house would cost a great deal of money to rehabilitate, and ne thinks landmark status would reduce the lan:le value because a developer would face the prospect of res,oring it and developing around the house or moving it elsewhere on the property. It was explained that landmark status does not freeze a structure and does not mandate any requirements except to apply for a permit from the Historic Preservation Commission for material changes to the exterior and changes in use. Review by the Commission does not mean that changes, even demol'ittiion,, cannot take place. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE- September 21, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING WITH MR. ROBERT FLOCKER, OWNER OF THE FISHER HOUSE, A POTENTIAL LOCAL LANDMARK I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council not accept r. g oc er s offer to donate the Fisher House to the City and to architecturally and shistoricallylImportantb and sit 1s ai notable feature on Etiwanda Avenue. II. BACKGROUND• At the City Council meeting of August 3, 1988, Mr. o er ocker spoke against landmark designation of the Fisher House, which he owns. The Council voted to continue the item so that a meeting with W. Flocker, a Councilmember, and staff could be arranged to discuss possible options. Councilmember Jeff King was appointed to serve on this subcommittee. The meeting took place on the porch of the Fisher House on Tuesday, August 9, 1983, at 5 :30 p.m. In attendance were Mr. Flocker, Mr. Hudson, Jeff King, Brad Buller, and Arlene Banks. Mr. Flocker's brother James Flocker joined the meeting at about 6:20 p.m. The meeting ended about 6 :55 p.m. III. DISCUSSION: Mr. Flocker said that he opposes landmark designation ecause a Someday wants to sell the property for development and thinks that the value is in the land, not In the house, and that the land is more valuable without the house than with it. He said that the house would cost a great deal of money to rehabilitate, and ne thinks landmark status would reduce the lan:le value because a developer would face the prospect of res,oring it and developing around the house or moving it elsewhere on the property. It was explained that landmark status does not freeze a structure and does not mandate any requirements except to apply for a permit from the Historic Preservation Commission for material changes to the exterior and changes in use. Review by the Commission does not mean that changes, even demol'ittiion,, cannot take place. h J �Y E C CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT The Fisher House September 21, 1988 Page 2 Mr. Flocker feels his lard value was already affected once when the Commercial zoning under t'te ;ounty was changed to Res+dential with a Community Services ova ;•lay under the Etiwanda Specific Plan. He does not find the incentives in the Plan to be of interest and thinks that someday the property will be developed with "low impact " commercial uses. Mr. Flocker also objects to designation on principle because he does not like the City having any additional controls over his property. He feels he is being forcai to cake plans and commitments at a time when he does rot wart to do anything with the property. He thought that:the best solution would be for the City to move the house off the property and he presented an offer in writing that the City accept the house and move it within a year. Councilman King asked appraised with and with Property appraised. Cot to retain this house sn desire to work coopera' solution that would be thought it would be he assuming various scenar tabling the matter until house, at which time Councilman King also inc liability insurance and Mr. Flocker if he had had the property lot the house. Mr. Flocker had not had the ncilman King expressed the City's wish both the lot where it now stands and the City's ively with Mr. Flocker to come up with a satisfactory to everyone. Councilman King pful to put together different appraisals os. He also mentioned the possibility of Mr Flocker wishes to sell or to remove the the Council will reconsider designation. sired about the possibility or existence of rlacing a fence around the house. Councilman King expressed the idea that there are developers that would want something like this on his/her property and that it would create a unique development using this house as a centerpiece. He thought that thr. City would demand that projects on this portion of Etiwanda Avenue be of exceptionally outstanding quality, and the house would improve the prospects for such a development. He asked Mr. Flocker what would it Wke for him to cooperate with the City and support landmark designation. Mr. Flocker replied that he preferred to have the City consider first his offer of the house. The desirability of having the house remain where it is or close by was discussed. Potential lots for move -ons t.arth of Base Line Road on Etiwanda Avenue were mentioned, as well as the possibility of mcving the house to the Chaffey- Garcia property across the street. The group toured a few rooms in the house, which is boarded up. There are some signs of deterioration, but generally the house appears to be sound. ��o I CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT The'Fisher House September 21, 1908 Page 3 IV. ALTERNATIVES: In staff's opinion, there are many possible rec ons take. A. Designate the house as a landmark. The consequences of this are: 1. Landmark status would acknowledge the importance of the house and might help to preserve it. This option does not preclude the acceptance of Mr. Flocker's offer. 2. If Mr. Flocker wished to move or demolish the house he would have to apply for an alteration permit and justify the move or demolition to the Historic Preservation Commission. 3. The house would become eligible for current and future preservation incentives, B. Accept W. Flocker's offer. The consequences of this decision are: 1. The City would be spending many thousands of dollars to move the house and for possible property acquisition; 2. The historical value of the house would be lessened and it may no lcnger be potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places depending oh the location and geographic orientation of the new placement; 3. The City would incur the responsibility of finding a lot and protecting, maintaining, and restoring or rehabilitating the house (or finding someone else to do so); 4. The historical environment of Etiwanda Avenue may be• diminished; S. Perhaps most important, this may set a precedent that the City will move significant historic structures if owners object strenuously enough to landmark designation. (As you know, landmark designation is an exercise of the City's police powers which it affect creates on overlay zone where there is special design review as well as spc•Ial privileges. A city's right to designate landmarks was confirmed by the Suprema Court in Penn Central Transportation Co, v. City of New York.) C. Table the designation. The consequences of this decision are: .t�r ati. CITY COUNCIL'SiAFF;REPBRT., The Fisher House = '- -, _ September 21, _1988 Page A 1. Proposals to reprove, demolish, or alter, the house would reactivate the Council hearing because changes cannot be approved until a decision has been made by the Council. 2. The situation would remain as it is now. D. Deny the Designation. The consequences of this are: 1. Mr. Flocker would probably find this an acceptable alternative. 2. The house could be demolished or moved outside of the City or radically altered with no input from City agencies beyond issuance of an applicable permit. 3. The house,woutd still be eligible to use the incentives in the Etiwanda Specific Plan is 'bonus' residential unit or adaptive reuse with a CUP), but would not be eligible to use the Historical Building Code and other incentives that may be adopted by the Council. In summary, the City Council is requested to act on the recommendation of the Historic Preservation Commission for landmark designation and secondly consider Mr. Flocker 's proposal. Regarding landmark designation the Council may approve, deny, or table, action on the designation or continue the matter for further information. f a Re ult it , -�f d r City lanner BB:AB:vc Attachments: Staff Reports with Atta:hments Letter from Robert Flocker Resolution /(44 r, n DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 3, 1988 Mayor and Members of the City Council Brad Buller, City Planner Arlene Banks, Associate Planner A Proposal to Designate The Fisher House, 7165 Etiwanda v v venue^ anc 0 ucamonga, as a LandmarK. p'— ZT7:T3I -Td I. Recommendation: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends a , e ouncil designate the Fisher House a landmark because it has both historical and architectural value and meets the criteria established in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. In addition, the historical survey team's findings were that the house has State and National Register potential. II. Background• A. Current status: This item was continued from the meeting of June 15, 1988. The owner and his family object to designation of this property b -cause they do not wish to be encumbered with the designation if they desire to remove the house and offer the land for sale. The Historic Preservation Commission finds that the house not only meets the criteria in the ordinance, but is a particularly important structure. They expressed the opinion that if the house must be moved, that it be moved to a more suitable spot on the site or at least remain close to its current location. If the house is designated a landmark, the moving or demolition would be subject to review and approval by the Commission. The' owners'do not wish to undergo this review. — 8. Incentives: The City Council requested that staff look into the matter of incentives that the City can offer to owners to make landmark designation more attractive. The general topic of incentives is discussed in a separate staff report. Incentives available to help preserve the Fisher House include the provisions for 'notable structures' in the Etiwanda Specific Plan that enable nonconformities to be treated as conforming, the exclusion of these notable structures in residential densi+;y calculations which allow! the structure to 17 c0 }u" CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT _ THC FISHER HOUSE August 3, 1988 Page 2 be an extra unit; the converrion of houses to non - residential uses with a Conditional Use Permit; and entitlement, if it is a landmark, to use the Historical 3ui:dinp Code. If the house is qualified for listing on the National Register and were to be used as a rental or office Or other depreciable use, and were to undergo substantial, certified rehabilitation, it could quality for a tax credit equal to 20 percent of rehabilitation costs. C. Site Plans: The City Council also requested to look at a site plan that shows the house in relationship to, the site. Attached to this Staff Report are alternative layouts developed by staff. Two schemes assume a single._family residential development, the other two assume r mixed use development with the Fisher House being adaptivoly reused. One of each leaves the house as it sits and the other shows the house located elsewhere on the site. There appears to be several ways to develop this property that wculd include preservation of the Fisher House. III. Alternatives: The City Council's alternatives are: 1.) to accept the Historic Preservation Commission's recommendation and designate the Fisher House a landmark; 2.) to deny the designation even though it meets the criteria in the ordinance; 3.) to designate the Fisher House as a point of historic interest which recognizes the historical value of the house but does not require Historic Preservation Comission review of changes; 4.) to continuo the item. Iv. Additional Rationale for Designation: A. The Uoittd States Supreme Court has ruled that designation of landmarks 4enefits all citizens and improves the quality of life, and Oat designation is legitimate as long as an owner is able to make a reasonable return on his investment. Designation of the Fisher House would not prevent use of the property or reasonable return on investment; it would help protect the house from inappropriate alterations and make it eligible to use the Historical Building Code. 171 4. " ti CITY COUNCIL STAFF'EiepDAT -. THE FISHER HOUSE"'. , August 3, 1988 Page 3 B. Now that a proposed shopping center and condominium development at the'corner of Etiwanda and Base Line is iMng its way through the planning process, the value of this land may oe increasing and the likelihood of development in the near future would be greater. Keeping the heritage of the Etiwanda area of- Rancho Cucamonga alive depends on'- retention of as much of•the'original historical' fabric as possible and on using._the historic buildinqs as a touchstone for new development. Without, inclusion of authentic, original buildings in the developmr.t, of Etiwanda; the' turn-of-the- century them 'will be artificial and not" In keeping with, the goals and policies of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Uesignatfon , of the Fisher House will help to keep the character of this unique community. C. The Etiwanda Specific Plan calls for the protection and enhancemmnt of the visual and historical character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue and its surroundings. Designation of the Fisher House 1s consistent with this purpose. Y. Action Requested: Staff requests that the City Council accept the recome affo—nof the Historic Preservation Commission and designate the Fisher House as'a landmark. /Ole ly rer BB:AB:mlg Attachments: Staff Reports Resolution Alternative Site Plans I7,, u`y y, 6� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 15, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROH: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE FISHER HOUSE, 7165 ETINANDA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AS A LANDNAAK I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recomends a e until designate 7165 Etiwanda Avenue a landmark. II. BACKGROUND: This house, located across Etiwanda Avenue from the a e—F rcia House, is a Queen Anne Vfctcrfan -style structure built fm 1892. Frcm 1907 to 1930 the switchboard of The home Telephone Company, a mutual cooperative compart owned by Etiwanda citizens, was located in this house and operated by Mrs. Florence Fisher and her daughter, Nellie. The house is significant because of its architecture, Its age, and its historical role in the development of Etiwanda. The property is located in the Cbmmonity Services Overlay District and the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. The Plan provides substantial incentives to help foster preservation of "notable" structures; e.g., they may be converted to various commercial and professional uses with a Conditional Use Permit on this portion of Etiwanda Avenue. In addition, the Plan also permits notable structures to serve as a 'bonus" for residential developments on lots of 1 acre or more. These structures are not included in density calculations and do. not reduce the number of new dwellings permitted. Mr. Robert Flocker, owner of this house as well as several adjacent lots, is opposed to designation. Mr. Flocker is planning to sell the house and have it relocated possibly outside the City. Although landmark status would not necessarily prevent removal, the Historic Preservation Commission would review relocation glens. Mr. Flocker does not wish to be subject to such review. He does not want to demolish the house, but he does want to clear the land and sell it for development. He has expressed his apposition in writing a; well as orally (a Copi of applicable correspondence is attached for reference). ' Cm The June Page 9 1 c i III. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMIISSION-ACTION: The Historic Preservation ss on voted unanimously zo recommend landetark designation at its MAY 5, 1988 mlceting. The Commission felt that the house was important enough'to warrant designation. They thought it should be kept near other important historic structures in Etiwanda. If the Fisher House must be moved, they would prefer that it be relocated close to its current location. Resp lly ted r Bul r City niter BB:AB.vc r „ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS- ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS- STAMM. HASKVITZ BANKS, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT -- carried x*N*ra D. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF 7165 ETINANDA AVENUE RANCHO wEt aT—nda Avenue Da (IN" istoric Landmarii JRA: 227-S131-23. Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Robert Flocker, owner of 7165 Etiwanda Avenue, the Fisher House, expressed his opposition to the designation. Copies of his written objections were distributed to the Commission. Commissioner Banks stated that one of Mr. Flocker's main concerns is that the la,idmark status would prevent moving, which is not the case. She stated he would have to come before the Commission with an 41teratlon Permit. She stated that the house is of great significance, that across the street from the house are two landmarks an! there are two more to the north and that it is a great advantago to the City to have so many landmarks close together. She stated that if the owner decides t3 move it that it will stagy close by and maybe the property could ce converted to commercial use. Larry Henderson, Senior Planner, questioned if Mr. Flocker was planning a sell the property and the structure Mr. Flocker stated that not at th4s time. He stated he feels the house is in the middle of the four P,res and in the way of being able to develop the property. He states that he has been trying to sell the house for some time and has had two offers Larry Henderson questioned if the two offe -s had expressed any idea as to what purpose or location. Mr. Flocker stated that it was for residential use and they had desired keeping it in Etiwanda. Larry Henderson questioned If the structure was designated, would it bring a better selling price. Mr. Flocker stated that he did rot see how it would but would place more restrictions on the property. He stated that it should be up to the property owner to have their property or structure designated. HPC MINUTES -4- 17-5- MAY S. 1988 a Larry Henderson explained the procedure for designation and moving the structure. Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearing. Commissioner Banks stated that she felt the economic value as a commercial use would be great if it was-to remain at the site, ' Commissioner Arner moved to recommend to City Council the approval of the Historic Landmark Designation of 7163 Etlwanda Avenue. Commissioner Banks seconded the motion. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BALMS, COOPER, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: STAMM, HASKYITZ -- carried E II: b.6MWNUM - q propotcr to designate a or muse, ReTTman Avenue, a Historte anthark - f.PO: £02- 061 -12. Arlene Banks presented the staff re ort. Chairman Schmidt opened the ppu is hearing. Hecrtng none, Chairman Schmidt closed the public hearin . Commissioner Billings verified a stgnificance of the hoise. Commissioner Billings moved recommend to City Council the approval of Historic Landmark Designati of 6797 Hellman Avenue, excluding the out buildings Commissioner nor seconded the motion. The motion was carried by the following v te: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BILLINGS, ARNER, BALMS, COOPER, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONER . NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONE : STAMM, HASKYITZ -- carried 17 HPC MINUTES -5- MAY S. 1988 DATE: TO: FROH: BY: SUBJECT: I ar. CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT May 61 198e M Chairman and Ntmbers of tsie Historic Preservation Comoission Larry Henderson, Senior Planner Arlene Banks, Associate Planner PROJECT AI0 SITE DESCRIPTIO;;: A. Action Retested: That the Iistoric recmund to We City Councir ad: designating the Fisher House, 7165 Cucamonga, a Historic Landmark. B. Location: The house is on the east nor o false Line Road, south of the and across the street frm the Chaftey. C. C. Overla -- District. Etfwanda Avenue, Electric tracks House. esipation' The sit• MIT rasf3, - no tfflc Pler.. 1 t. (4 -E Jrelli-g ,, s JS t . As Lot'-K-4,= Iude4 i % orop,rty ',, the CommNAity _Mice - racanc; uesignatedZow- a um es. entq jb'T dwelling units per acre) on the Etfwanda Specifi- Plan Map and also on the General Plan Hap. It is within the Etiwandd Avenue Overlay District a,,d the Community Service Overlay District. South - Vacant (with a new chain -link fence); Designated Low. 4edium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) on the Etiwanda Specific Plan and on the General Plan. East - Vacant; Same designation as above. -he property to the east 1s not within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District or the Community Service Overlay District. J 1 R HPC STAFF REPORT RE: 7165 ET1NANDA AVE. May 5, 1988 Page 2 1 Nest - The site is directly across the street from the Chaffey -Garcia House which is on lend designated L", Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) in the Victoria Planned Comwnity Specific Plan. However, the Chaffey Garcia House 1s within the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay,Distrfct and the Crmmunity Service Overlay District. E. Overlay Districts Within the Etiwanda S eciffc Plan: The s er use s w n e wan a venue ts the Community Service Overlay District. er ey trict and 1. The Etiwanda Specific Plan contains provisions tailored to the Etiwanda area. These provisions replace City- wide regulations. They were adopted to take into account Etiwanda's special character, while allowing a reasonable level of development. Throughout the Plan, there are references to historical features such as period architecture, windbreaks and tree lined streets, and rock curbs. The Plan encourages historic preservation. 2. The purpose of the Etiwanda Avenue Overlay District 1s to protect and enhance the visual and historical character and the quality of Etiwanda Avenue and 4ts Immediate surroundings. Minimum setbacks are 25 feet with a 30 foot average setback. Structures facing Etiwanda Avenue must be at least 25 fart apart. Styles are encouraged to be traditional and field stone used as major design element. A single family appearance is to be maintained and landscaping is to be consistent with the streetscape theme contained to the Plan. 3. The Community Service Overlay District was formed to provide opportunities for limited or specialized, low. Impact commercial and quasi - commercial services. Its— purposes are to provide a focal point in the heart of the community that reinforces a sense of community identity and to encourage perpetuation of features that are tied to Etiwanda's heritage. With a Conditional Use Permit and provisions that assure no adverse impacts and enhancement of the visual and historical character of Etiwanda, professional offices, restaurants, beauty ' shops, farmers' markets and similar uses could be permitted, as well as schools, churches, community buildings and the like. 178 HPC STAFF REPORT RE: 7165 ETIWANDA AVE. MAY S. 1988 Page 3 r. 1esertI n: The Hfs:oric Resources Inventory form describes ih� Ouse as Fpindle -work Queen Anne. The description reads as follows: "An irregular shaped single s•nry structure of wood construction with cwmbination hipped and front and side gablos. Rrof has composite shingles. Eaves are enclosed. Gable ends have shingle treatment and detailed verge bcsrds. Siding is flush boards. An integral porch is located an the front with lattice work frieze suspended under porch ceiling, turned porch supports and spindle -work in the balustrade. Porches are of wood. There are similar porches located at the rear of the structure on both the north and south sides. Foundation material is wood. Doors and windows are unknown, due to being boarded. The structure is located on a large, vacant lot of 10 acres. A barn of similar structure was located at the rear of this structure, however, it has collapsed. There are two large trees located to the front of the house, between the dirt driveways. A row of trees lines the street in front of this structure." The large trees in front of the house appear to be togtheistreet. tands near the stone curbs. II ANALYSIS: A. Backgrrooun�d - G�ener!ll: This house was selected from the list if paten aEiTTanM� ss identlfied in the 1987 survey. Reasons for Oast nation: This house is significant because of its age and its c or an -era Queen Anne architecture. It is estimated to have been built in 1895. Etiwanda The First 100 Years gives an 1892 date. It is also s gn can ecause was the location of the switchboard for the Home Telephone Company which was organized in June of 1907 and owned by the people of Etiwanda. The switchboard was staffed by Mrs. Florence Fisher and her daughter Nellie. The switchboard was moved and mechanized in 1930. C. Issues: This house is unoccupied and boarded up. Designation cou perhaps help along the process of rehabilitation and reoccupuation. fie City's Development Code allows landmark residences to be used for non - residential purposes with a Conditional Use Permit, and the Ettwanda Specific Plan also f71 1 , HP C '.STAFF REPORT AE: _,7165 ,rTIWANDA AVE. May 6, 1988' Page 4 i r, Rrovides for alternative uses. Funds for rehabilitation, owever, ere scarce. If the building is eligible for the Hatlonal Register of Historic Places if r and it were to be converted to commercial use or rental residential use and needs substantial rehabilitation. e might qualify ers iso Incometaxcreditfocertf d rehabiltl There a possibility that future California Bond funds could become available for pro pperties which a local muntefpal,agancy ` owns or has an interest 1n (such as a facade easeaw:nt)., On the other hand, rehabilitation for owner- occupancy could take place is developpeeeent pressure in _the area increases. Respectful rehab111tatfon that is In harmony with the Victorian architecture of the house would help set the tone for this stretch of Etiwanda Avenue. The rehabilitation of the Chaffay- Garcfa House has provided a solid start in the direction of developing this area in accord with the vision embodied in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Fisher house 1s worthy of recognition as a landmark and should be encouraged to follow in the steps of the Chaffey -Garcia House and be reclaimed. 0. Environmental Assessment: Designation of a landmark is exempt ram requ remKn ticle 19. Section 15308). III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Criteria selected from the Ordinance that are app ca .a a sher House are as follows: A. Hfstorical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark 1s particularly representative of an historical period and style. 2. The proposed landmark 1s an example of a type of building which is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. 4. The proposed landmark is connected with a (historic) business. B. Historical Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1. The overall effect of the Jesign of the proposed landmark is beautiful. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 130 HPC STAFF REPORT r . RE: 7165 ETIN 'i AVE. May 5, 1988 Page 5 2. The: proposed landmark in its location represents an + established and familiar visual feature of the i 2 community. y TV. CORRESPOWENCE: This item has b,ien advertised.as a public hearth a�i11(e art newspaper and notices have been sent to the owner an proper • owners within 300 feet. A message was left on the owners answering tape informing him of the upcoming hearing. ,4 V. RECOMENDATION• Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation "Ea=P ss of recomend to the City Council that, they adopt a ,., Resolution designating the Fisher House a landmark because it meats +: the critaria established in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Such designation is also to conformity with policies of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and the Ettwands Specific Plan. Respectfully submitted, Larry Henderson yn Senior Planner LH:AB:ko d: Attachments �k r8/ 24M e _ II- I i �e� MCipwe �G �� J I to 7Struc�I +*+ *+ Notabls a. �I F''shor fFeusc 6956 (Address) lk Chaffey /Garcia Houee to be relocated ri::[ FOOthm blvd. S.P. NOTABLE STRUCTURES 5 -43 ,i n C }� F''shor fFeusc 6956 (Address) lk Chaffey /Garcia Houee to be relocated ri::[ FOOthm blvd. S.P. NOTABLE STRUCTURES 5 -43 ,i n a 7' L*Cltl*u slistCh "P (draw ► label #It* and Inormunding streets, roads, and prominent lmdmarkm)s Be Approximto property ■izat Lot Size (in feet) rreaten, lieptis , or approx. acres= B. Condition: (-beck one) A. Excelleat b. Good c. FAIr _I_-d.,D@terIcr4ted 4, a. No longer In existence 10- IN the feature: A. Altere7?—, b. UQ&It*r@djAnn,r,,Ljy — 11. Surratiodions (check more ths 000 It necessary) a- Open land X b. Residential X C. Scattered buildings d. 0044017 built-up l f Industrial ---T 9. Other 7 l tAty'QUAacto Cucamonga �j Yel APPlIcitiont for.-"." - RISTOMW;LOWDKM Dial(VATION or INTRUST, MIGRATION -4 istcrfc Lladvark IstorLa 1, ­777- Polm"t o' IDINrUTCATIOn 2. Ustorle KINN, if known, Fisher Houss, or Rorton.hs4r H�� OU30 S. Street or',19ral Addressi 7165 61haft a'A"sAffue h. City COMAt'st SIR BImsrdfm,,,0 yi Aamsessor-& Lon) D@mcri;'V4e1;`t M.M. 4. PrImeat Owner, It kawj _Iatli Adiri6a' r1,22-6, T �'z Si C1ty#_j=jb2SUUam2L Zips 91701 is oftermbip IN, public" I -, Private-=-- Xr A. P" 'east 9*01 Other past uens, 093CRIPTION 6. Briefly de"rLb, the irnext I • a an • Of the &tts,or estsuCtu" and dRmrlb* any vN12182 or a Midat ft News can 1111M.0 Its orIgIoLl for QUAM Anne Victorian house p.A 'a COW se nv FREE � This SOMIsnoork Plus M I POM-43 WIM turned costs ..d I ---- --- Is L L taardae D a 7' L*Cltl*u slistCh "P (draw ► label #It* and Inormunding streets, roads, and prominent lmdmarkm)s Be Approximto property ■izat Lot Size (in feet) rreaten, lieptis , or approx. acres= B. Condition: (-beck one) A. Excelleat b. Good c. FAIr _I_-d.,D@terIcr4ted 4, a. No longer In existence 10- IN the feature: A. Altere7?—, b. UQ&It*r@djAnn,r,,Ljy — 11. Surratiodions (check more ths 000 It necessary) a- Open land X b. Residential X C. Scattered buildings d. 0044017 built-up l f Industrial ---T 9. Other 71. Msio thew of the historic reaourc•t tbas r>rw.quawxt A. Arehitsaturs x b. Arta k Leisure C- ECCOMIC /ledustrial x d, Goveresent G. Enploration/Settlewat f Military a. Religion_— h. SOCIII /Rducation Z: Sourness Llat book., docOmdatst survey., per.opul 1ptarviaws, wad their dataot. State Ntstorfc�sourtes Cnren[ary fora Ett ands_ _ -inn Cf rr! IIXI W 23. Data tore prepared 1or11. 1996 By lnamgs Arlene Bans Addrom Cltyl Zips__ . Phone: _ Orxanitation, _,hY or Rancho C cacao ca )d. Threats to SStes ?� a. Note kooao_ b. Private dayslop, set_ x C. Zoelo 8. Puhli¢ Yorks aro)•¢t_� •. VandalismX f. Other- ^ y 11. Oates Of enolomed Photographic) 196) and 1960 .. i. NMI Tea following (It,, 1e -10) are for atrueturee only. 14. Primary uteri -a, building matarlala a. Stan*_ b. Brick_�,� o. StUC O- d. Adobam-- -. e. Wood I C. Other N, ` y. 10. is the shuott", A. On Its or1g1u1 shat x , :T b. Moved? G. Dakcowot !' 10. rear of initial Const"Otlou_ 1695 a i This Date tat A. yaotual D. Ltiaated r , 17. Architect (if ktowo)s i 10. Builder (if kao•o), p 10. R•latsd yaatnrus a, pare b. Carriage bows Y o. Outhouse d. Bhed(s) •. 70r l Garden(.) f. Wladalll g. Wat•rtowr /ta:khouw h. Other .rev. 1. None StGNIFICANCW 20. Briefly state historical and /or architectural LmPertano• (Include decent seats, and ;ormcav aaapOlaUd with the Site when anneals (tae State Porn) Nos Teleahoae — - Sv1 c.. located hen from 190) to 1910. Srttchloard vas run by Floreace Fllher end her daughter, Nellie. 71. Msio thew of the historic reaourc•t tbas r>rw.quawxt A. Arehitsaturs x b. Arta k Leisure C- ECCOMIC /ledustrial x d, Goveresent G. Enploration/Settlewat f Military a. Religion_— h. SOCIII /Rducation Z: Sourness Llat book., docOmdatst survey., per.opul 1ptarviaws, wad their dataot. State Ntstorfc�sourtes Cnren[ary fora Ett ands_ _ -inn Cf rr! IIXI W 23. Data tore prepared 1or11. 1996 By lnamgs Arlene Bans Addrom Cltyl Zips__ . Phone: _ Orxanitation, _,hY or Rancho C cacao ca $1.10 .1 Cm lorma_The PUwrpl A%vhCv Set. No. 17 in � 97 DEPARTMENT OP PARKS AND RECREATION HABS_HAER —Loc — HL No —NR StaNs- UTNI: A 11- a51 87o- 3776775 C HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY B O_ IDENTIFICATION F1 her Hnus 1 Common name: 2. Histoncrume: Fisher Hous — 3. Streetormialaddrav: 7165 Etiwanda Avenue Cites Rancho_ Cucainonoa. Calif. pp 91739 County San Bernardino a. Parcel number: 0227-13-1-23 - -- 5. Praunt Ownar. Robert C Flocker Address: 6226 Topaz 11. Ody RLnc`" ruramonna. Calif. Tip 91701 Ownershlp is: Public Pnvale X 6. Present Use: PatidPMCe Orfgialuse: Residonce DESCRIPTION Its. Arm.tmuralstvis: Spindlework Queen Anne 70. BrIony desenbe the pnMntanytiaNpPearann of the site or structure and describe any major alterations from its crigmal c- ndit.on: An irregular shaped single story structure of wood Construction with combination enclosed and Gable endsnaavedshingles has composite and detailed verge boards. are boards. Siding is flush Dcards An integral porch is located on the front with latice work frieze suspended under porch ceiling, turned porch supports and spindle - work in the balustrade Porches are of wood There are sirtilar porches located at the rear of the structure on both the north and south sides Foundation material is wood Boors and windows are unknown, due to being boarded The structure is located on a large vacant lot of 10 icre ttbarn collapsed structure was located at the rear o. this structure, however, There are two large trees located to the front of the house, between the dirt driveways A row of trees lines the street in front of this structure Curb in this area is original stone / .- OPR 523 (Rev. 11165) 8. Cont[rvct11895 Esum.ted Factual 9. Ardwua ��- Ur.known 10. 6wWe. Unkncwn 11. APPNe. property size tin it*?) Frontage Deptri — or approx. acreage 10 12. Date(l) of endosad PhntogrWrit) July 1987 17. Ccndltlon: Eaullmt �G°od •� Fsr__ Dnrriaracd X No loncer in "Istence ia. Attmdonr Recwval of surroundin rove- Coardin Of structure iS Surnrundngt:(Check mom than ante rr nacaarv) OPan land % r' Raidmtrl A Industrial %CQ,,n djn 0tln: ."+uttered hu(IdLpa� Oenaly bulltvp .� 1S Thratt to dtr: None known_p h to davelo Public W palm alm__ othn• pnerht. -X Zoning.__ ywhigio, 77. It tlts strurnun Dn l4 PrltlMl dta7_� fdowd7 Un4nown7 t8 Related fururn: WA SIGNIFICANCE 19- 86eRY ttatr hlnaricu and/or a.;nitacanrel tmporbnn (irdudr delta, swot. std Plmm anotatad with Me site) Location ed onnyy07. Theoswitchboardtwaso "womtaned" by Frs. Florente Fisher and her daughter Nellie. The switchboard was moved and mechanized in 1970 r'b71 21. Main Nerve of the hhmrlp resource; (It may then one 4 cracked, nomoar In order of rtnpartanca.l Atrhitechne ArtaALrbun Ecanomk/IrdusWel - LUPlmtkhn/Srttlanrnt Gavarnmem Military Religion , SOdII/Education Sou :ei :Lin tuoka. docummta. "no. Prtonai In4Natw and their dnes). "A Field Guide to American Homes% Virginia and Lee McAlester 22 Datrformprepmm September 29 1987 ey (rams Lvnn Yerr OrgmiLtion —'��' Address: Gry ZP Phanc- M6 •ucapanat •eatch map (draw and label else end arraunding ttrank Muds, and pmrhlnmt:ardmarktlt I I , M i' I 6226 Topaz Alta Loma, CA 91701 August 9, 1988 Rancho Cucamonga City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Council Members: Re: Proposed historic landmar- designation of 7165 Etiwanda Avsnue, Rancho Cucamonga. APN 12227- 131 -23 I appreciate your efforts to arrive at a satisfactory solution concerning the historic landmark designation of and house located at 7165 Etiwanda Avenua. Since the city wishes to preserve this house, I hereby make a formal written offer to donate the house, excluding all land which I own underneath and surrounding it to the City of Rancho Cucamonga under the following conditions: 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has i year from the date of acceptance of this offer to move the house from and property. 2 The house ie to be moved from my property entirely at the City of Rancho Cucarmonga's expense. 3. Upon acceptance of this offer, the City of Rancho Cucamonga assumes all liability for i.ny injuries incurred by persons invtiving the house while it remains on my property. 4. 1 am not responsible for any of the expenses involved in the restoration of the house. S. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will discuss the disputed historic landmark designation of oy house at the September 21, 1988 city council meeting. .he City of Rancho Cucamonga will honor my request not to designate the house as a historic landmark until the house is moved from my property. I will give the city council up to 2 weeks past the date of this meeting to decide whether to accept or reject nd offer. 6. The city council must notify me to writing of their decision concerning this offer by October 5, 1988. Sincerely, NL e . Robert C Flocker IV 7 RESOLUTION NO. 99-4D (10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE FISHER HOUSE LOCATED AT 7165 ETIWANDA AVENUE AS A LAf DMM WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Coomfssion has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Landmark Designation and issued Resolution No. 88 -07 recommending to this City Council that said Landmark Designation be approved. the HistoricRPEreservationyCommission aregarding said Lanidmark Designation. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NON, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucammuga City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as fo;twrs: SECTION I• The application appifes to property located at Assessor Parcel N er .t9 / -� SECTION The oniprestablishe-d--aP er 2200 of the Rancho CucamongaMucialCode: A. Historic and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of a historical period and style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark is of greater age than most of its kind. 4. The proposed landmark is connected with a (historic) business.. B. Hlstorfcal- Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1. The overall effect of the design of the proposed landmark is beautiful. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the ttY.uunity. FAIM41 �i << " CITY- COUNCIL- RESOLUTION NO.: " RE: 'THE FISHER HOUSE'LAMxW DESIGNATION August 3.11988';, page 2 LSEECTION III: Design'aticn of a landmark is exempt fril 6EQA (Article`19,tr, SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and'reviewed by this ounc and based on the findings set forth above, NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucaaonga City Council does hereby approve designation of the Fisher House as a landmark. s — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT Da:. September 21, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: James T. Harris, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Consideration of a revised Traffic Signal Illuminated Street Name Sign Face Design RECOMENDATION: Approve the new sign face design that adds the City's multi- colored logo to the present design of large white letters on a green background for use throughout the City. (Option B attachmnnt) KXGAD= /AN&ySIS: A request has been made to consider changing the design of the faces of illuminated street name signs used on traffic signal mast arms. The most common sign face specified in Rancho Cucamonga, alto used statewide, has only the street name in 8" upper case and 6" lower case white letters an ,,!reen and has numbrerr.0 The current design used in Rancho whi tam olettersliand bordereonoa green background bbuut withoutpthes rape logo. grape A variation to the present design was used to distinguish Civic Center Drive sedAvenue a nmulti- colored new logo on a beige background with black letters. The two proposed sign designs, as shown on the attached graphics, have elements used on signs to Rancho Cucamonga and elsewhere. The use of the street name type abbreviation above the appropriate block number is continued in both designs as this is a service to drivers. The inclusion of the City name as shown on the shorter of he two sign designs, is used by many cities. With city names, all lettering must be smaller so as to fit on the normal sign face height. With the City logo on the side of the sign face, some signs would need to be longer but, in most cases, letter sizes would remain the same as currently used. The logo would be the multi- colored grape logo used at the Civic Center and is similar to the logo used in the City s entry monuments. Use of the logo would carry this grape theme throughout the City. 'Es CCSR September 21'.•,1988 Page 2 Street name sions shbul be 'clearly visible to traffic a�pAa-chinq from all directionsh' as-is required by California VeMcle Code (CYC),,Section 21366. Larger lettering would tend 'to increase thfs' -Visibf If ty. Therefore. the signs-1-ning the logo rather, Me. the City n 41 am would • better conform.to the CVC. Some concern has been expressed as to-the stability of illumfnate'd street name signs in the high winds sometimes experienced in Rancho Cucamonga. The manufacturer who 'produces the majcrity of this type or sign was contacted regarding our recent sign, specificatfe , change. - 4 This specification change- our that signs-and 't6efr mounting hardware withstand 80 MPH wind loading (normal Is 70 WH) with gusts up 125 MPH. The manufacturer has exv.riemented with heavier duty bar are and additional bolt-on brackets -'and feels' -confident in meeting our* specification. As new Ogns are Installed they must, meet this specification. Res!je ubmf tted. - RHM• _THtgp Attachment Y N L _m N E Z Y d Y N d e E U) z 0 F- a 0 z c? N W 0 r PIQ 0 0 z _ 0 ���—(Dy LJ U U 6 I �J 0 T IL IL O (� � U 4 t �O �J f� 20 \I H Nz [4OI V n -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATEt September 6, 1988 TOt City Council and City Manager FROM Dennis L. Stout, Mayor SDBJECrt TaE INCREASED NEED FOR SPORTS FACILITIES As the City is increasing in sire sna population, the demand for aJditioml sports fields is becoming an irrepressible reality. As part of the update of the Public Facilities gleam: of the City's Coastal Plan being recommended by the Park and Recreation Comiaion for approval, the Commas @ion is also requesting that the Coesaunity Services Staff review the "floating designation locations" specified and research the general areas for potential park rites. In particular, the Park and Recreation Commission is interested in reviewing the Industrial Specific Area for a park site which could bouse a sports ccmplam, thus partially relieving the increased demand for sports facilities while not adversely impacting a residential comeuaity with noise and glare. I feel this concept deserves the support of the City Council and that am is the time to act due to the rising land costs and depletion of available property. Further, I feel that direction should be given to staff to look for land in the following categories: 1. Land potentially available on a long -tern lease (i.e., surplus land owned by one of the large industrial companies). 2 Surplus right- o£-vay (i.e., land owned by the Flood Control District, railroad, or other public agencies). 3. Any other vacant parcels currently available. Perhaps if we act now, ve can acquire land and continue to provide quality sports programs for the residents of Rancho Cucamonga. ICI 2 �- V 1, Spoicts Facil a a M September 6,11388 s4U Page, -.v In addition, it in prop'o'se-d that & special task force of -City staff:'"ers, representatives of each sporte• longue and school diitrict representatives be' formed to study long-range needs-for sports fields in our community. ' it is anticipated that the took force report be aubmitted'to the city council no later than January of 1989. With the permission of the City Council# I mould like to sarv* as the City Council representative on the task force, along with another council member and two representatives of the Perk and Recreation Commmisvion. DLStjl3 0701.11/89-620 11 }}4c -.�G; ji. -:f ?. ^.v,Cr?: - .ry.- yam•• -•s h1. , �Ywl4e 1` t m (; League, of Caiitomia Cities n t, ' VOOKSTRF.ET • e_ACRAMENTO.C: Wm4 . (9,,e1Ma-STee I.1; Sacramento, CA fro CZ July 15, 1988 TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATE FOR LEAGUE ANNUAL CONFERENCE Dear City Official: This year's League Annual Conference is scheduled for October 16 -19 in San Diego. One rovery important aspect of the Annual Conference 1s the General Business Session at which time the membership takes action on conference resolutions. It is important for California cities to take the initiative in developing yosltive programs for the future. Annual Conference resolutions will guide titles and the League in our efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government within this state All cities should be represented at the Business Session on Tuesday afternoon, d October 18, at 2:00 p.m. at the Town and Country Hotel in San Diego jounc s ou es �nate at t e us ness ess on, 16--in—e— vote n mat ers given to the city offi, delegate form.- If the Conference, it is expect `= delegate. However, if Conference but will be should be designated the Ing municipal or L esignated by the I or a member of the t one of these off] ty Council will ni ented by other ci I delegate or alter . f policy. A voting card will be Council on the enclosed °voting Council is in attendance at the will be designated as the voting ve a registered delegate at the 'facials, one of these officials Please forward the enclosed "voting delegate form- to the Sacramento office of the League at the earliest possible time, so that the proper records may be established for the Conference The voting delegate may pick up the city's voting card In the League Registration Area at the Town and Country Hotel in San Diego. If neither the vottng delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Session, the voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the exchange. An outline of the voting procedures that will be followed at this conference is printed on the reverse side of this memo it is suggested that the Mayor and all Council Members from a given city try to sit together at the Business Session so that, if amendments are considered, there may be an opportunity to exchange points of view and arrive at a consensus before the city's vote is cast Your cooperation in returning the attached 'voting delegate form' as soon as possible will be appreciated. Don Benninghoven Executive Director I93 i 1,- CITY: LEAGOE OF CALIFMIA CITIES 1988 ANNUAL CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE FORM 1. VOTING DELEGATE: 2 VOTING ALTERNATE:_ m ' ATTEST Please Return ;o: LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 1400 K STREET SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 Not Later Than Friday, September 30 1988 LO VTGOELFM.pol 15� : i Date: To: From: By: Subject: 1 — CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer Discussion of City Council Direction Regarding the Realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive RECD 40MTION: It is recomaended that the City Council discuss and confirm its direction regarding a reassessment of the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive as currently sh" in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: At its meeting of March 2, 1988, the City Council considered the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. At that time, tho Council gave direction that the alignment in the plan remain and that the City initiate a Specific Plan Amendment if and when a project proposal for the affected property is received. The amendment would require a comprehensive traffic study to assess the impacts of DDossible alternate alignments of Red Hill Country Club Drive, including tc existing one. A scope of work for such a study was developed upon recent receipt of a proposal for the site and is attached. It includes the goals for the study as sumrsari:ed at the September 16 meeting. Staff's understanding is that the study is to be conducted by a consultant selected by the City but acceptable to the developer and the City of Upland. The developer is to pay for the study, but the report will be made to the City. The developer has hired a consultant to do a traffic study of a lesser scope as part of his submittal to the City. He has been informed of the staff's understanding of how the study should actually be conducted, as stated above, and that the study currently being done does not fulfill that requirement. i 17 CCSR 4! September 21, 1988- page 2 Y' -'k Minutes of the City Council meting of September 16. 1987 an attached. ji, Also attached copies of correspondence regarding Red I 4ghborhood meeiings where the realignment was discussed, Hill la as well =ary of convents and the results of the meetings. as Respesct�TWISYb�n�tted, r RHM: Attachment i TRAFFIC STUDY REQUIREIE.NTS FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUP DRIVE GOALS TO BE ACHIEVED IH THE REALIGNMENT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE (RHCCD): 1. To maximize traffic safety. 2. To minimize the through traffic impact on the Red Hill Area, ' especially on Alta Cuesta/RHCCD. 3 Locate RHCCD where its impact on the property at the northeast corner of Foothill and Grove is the least for each of the alternatives studied. The SCOPE of the traffic study shall include these three goals and study, at the minimum, the following for the years 1990 (assumed ' construction of the property) and 2010 (assumed build Cucamonga): out of Rancho 1. A. The impact of keeping RHCCD at its present location at Foothill and then the impact of constructing a median across Foothill closing RHCCD to eastbound left turns. U -turns would be allowed at the Sycamore Inn median break. 1. B The impact of keeping RHCCD at its present location at Foothill, providing a median break there, and Installing a coordinated signal and appropriate left -turn channelization tetween Grave and RHCCD which would provide safe, efficient traffic flow between the two intersections. 1. C The impact of keeping RHCCD at its present location but closing it to the Red Hill Area.. Under this condition RHCCD would provide access to the Red Hill Country Club but be completely closed to the nelghhorhood. The cmount of through traffic using Alta Cuecta and RHCCO shall be calculated. 2 The Impact of moving RHCCD to intersect Grove to align with the driveway on the west side of Grove north of Foothill. 3 The impact of loving RHCCD to intersect Foothill east of the Texaco Gas Station at a signalized intersection. The study shall measure, but not be limited to, the following: Increase and decrease in daily, AN peak hour and PM peak hour volumes, anticipated incr_ases or decreases in traffic safety (traffic accidents and potential hazardous conditions), costs of construction and right -of- way, increased delay or improved flow. V/C ratios and LOS levels, signal timing schemes, traffic volume diversions and impacts on the Red Hill Area streets, and other measures which may be deemed necessary to meet the goals of this study. The study shall analyze and list the advantages and disadvantages of each possibility and determine the best option or range of options, as the study engineer determines. /97 wnaaw.. + +un >. lauqu. c/4 t���u -lu a1Nta'r r1/ ACTION: To be discussed at goals meeting on March 12. 1988. i;(46) H2. CONSIDERATION OF REAL!CML°NT OF RED HILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE. (8 o' '1110=-10 STREET PI) (Buquat) Councilmmbor Buquat stated that meetings bsve been held •ith residents in the area and numerous concerns veto addressed. He was no 10L, or sura it vas worth the problems that the realigemsnt is going to e.nerats. He requested this item be sent back to the Planning Commission to explore other options. City Council Minutes March 2. 1988 Page 19 Mayor Stout felt that no one vas comfortable with the aligtment. but it appeared to be the only solution. He suggested that San Antonio Community Hospital's opplication be accepted with the understanding that they are requesting an mendment to the specific plan. and that the specific plan mend:&ut go through the Planning Commission protaaa with an indspetdent traffic engineer hired to do a study to determine if there are other alternatives available. Thera were three things he would like to sass 1) maximiea traffic safety on Foothill Blvd. 2) minimize traffic on Red Hill. 3) realize the parcel tF.e hospital Owns is important. Cuuucilcenber Buquat would like the City to work more with Upland on this issue and open ama doors for future issues. Council-ember Wright had a problem with sanding the issue back to the Planning Commission. She felt it should be dealt with by the Council. James Markman. City Attorney. stated that by law this issue is required to go back to the Planning Comaission. It is an mendcant to the general plan. and therefore must go back to the Planning Cmmissio, Councilcmber Buquat stated the reascn he brought this issue back to Council was that he wanted an opportunity to review this situation. obtain nev information. have additional input from the residents in the area. and then have that information available before a commitment is made. ACTION: Refer item to Planning Commission for an Plan. amendment to the General 1 f 1 1 1 f I. IDEMrTFICATION OF rrENE FOR K= NESTING None suboittad. f f of f. 19a J. cmmahzcmoNS FROM TEB POBLIC Diane Williams. 7251 Amethyst. stated that the Friends of the Library are currently conducting a library needs assesment. She asked that the City conduct the needs assessment since they would have more clout with the County. Stout ivy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: July 14, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Chuck Mackey, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Update on Neighborhood Meetings Regarding Traffic Concerns JASPER STREET: of ,� ci •s On June 20, 1988, the first meeting regarding the management of traffic in the Jasper Street neighborhood was held and at tended by approximately 30 people. Ail property owners between 19th Street and Base Line Roan and between Carnelian Street and the west City limit were mailed meeting mailing in or itoe bring to the meeting. FifteenThwere notice d in. Land thirteen were received at the meeting. The major citizen concern is the speed of traffic on Jasper and Ruberds Streets. In conjunction with that is their concern about through traffic on Jasper Street, which contributes heavily to the speeding problem. There are also concerns about pedestrian safet�w, espe^_fally for children, along Jasper Street. In general, the feeling expressed by the citizens was frustration, and neighborhood. er� at i Staff assured them th at t at the speeding City is traffic concerned about neighborhood problems and that steps will-be taken to remedy problems. Additionally, several citizens listed the following traffic concerns: locations where visibility needs improvement, excessive truck traffic on Jasper, and the left -turn conflicts at Base Line Road and Topaz Street. Some noted that there is occasional enforcement of traffic regulations, but most believe that there is not nearly enough enforcement effort. The concerns over through traffic and the speed of traffic invoked many requests for 4 -way stop sign installations. Requests for more traffic enforcement and more traffic signals were also made. Suggestions to barricade Jasper or Topaz Street were also made. Traffic studies are under way on all of the expressed concerns. It is expected that the findings of these stuJies will be presented at a mfd- September meeting. Iq9 ■ Memo to: Mayor and Members of the City Council Dated: duly 14, 1988 Re: Neighborhood Meeting Updates Page: 2 RED HILL: The second Red Hill neighborhood meeting was held in May and at.ended by about 40 people. The findings of the traffic study were presented as follows: 1. Staff recommendation to allcviate the Alta Cuesta width problem identified in the liability safety audit for the California Municipal Insurance Authority by removal of ;irking on one side of Alta Cuesta instead of either ;omplete parking removal or establishing a one -way street, as re:ommend04 in the audit. 2. Discussion of a 35 MPH speed zone survey on Red All) Country Club drive between Foothill Boulevard and Alta Cuesta with the middle curve signed at an advisory speed of 30 MPH. Presently road is an unposted, 55 MPH zone. 3. Results of driver compliance to 4 -way stops and the 25 MPH speed limit on Alta Cuesta. 4. Results of study for more 4 -way stop locations. 4 -way stop control recommended at Valle Vista and Camino Sur. A 1 -way stop sign to be installed on Canino Sur at Calle Casino. S. Speed Bumps: City policy on the installation of speed humps 1s that the City does rot install speed bumps on public streets. The City Attorney has found speed bumps art not an approved traffic control device for installation on public streets, therefo.,e their installation would result in substantial liability exposure fnr the City. 6. Increase In the number of 25 KPH speed limit s+gns to mphasize the residential nature of the Red Hill stivcts. 1 Gated Comwnity: This is not feasible because all the pu ?.ic streets in Red Hill would have to be vacated and a homeowner's dssociation of all r e P `e j i i st' Memo to: Mayor and Members of the City Council Dated: July 14, 1988 Re: Neighborhood Meeting Updates Page: 3 property owners formed to assume all liability and maintenance costs for the street system. 8. Procedure to apply for assessment district formation to install street lights or sidewalks. 9. Report on study for 'no parking' zones other than Alta Cuesta. Buena Vista and part of Valle Vista are too narrow to allow parking if a centerline is installed. 10. Report on visibility of traffic control devices and any necessary required trimming of trees and bushes. 11. Through traffic impact and discussion of various techniques to reduce through traffic. All necessary action is complete except for items 1, 2 and 9. Since this meeting, the 35 MPH steed zone for lower Red Hill Country Club Drive has been approved by the City Council. A work order has been issued to install these speed limit signs and to improve the curve signing. The proposal to remove parking, especially on Alta Cuesta, produced more citizen input. Concerns were raised about parking next to retaining walls, the blind driveway locations and fairness about spreading the parking restriction from one side to another. Staff has addressed these concerns. Alta Cuesta and Valle Vista have been carefully investigated by walking the total length of each and the proposed changes marked. This item will be placed on the City Council Adenda for your concurrence. The residents along these streets will be notified by mail of the impending centerline change and parking restriction locations as well as the agenda date. Although not listed on the neighborhood meeting agenda, the subject of the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive came up. The consensus was that the existing intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive does not function well and, in peak hour times, functions very badly. There is little agreement as to where the new alignment shuuld be, however, there is complete agreement that through traffic should be eliminated and not encouraged by any new route which may be chosen. C--)t I 1 Memo to: M:kyor and Members of the City Council Dated: July 14, 1988 - Re: Neighborhood Meeting Updates page: 4 It was re- emphasized to the residents that the realignment of Red Mill Country Club Drive would be studied as part of the development review for '- the San Antonio r Foothill BoulevardoandtGrove Aven a D1fjand whenhsubmittedasto the City This project has just been submitted, thus the Red Mill Country Club Drive issue will shortly be addressed. RHM:CM:pam .4 C),)— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA April 22, 1988 . •rtJ� !m M, W Nip �.si, C.,,.mu, Qftaitl. II7N. (7141981-11 , Resident /Property Owner in the Red Hill Neighborhood of Rancho Cucamonga Subject: NOTICE OF•SECONO MEETING ON TRAFFIC CONCERNS Dear Resident /Owner: The City of Rancho Cucamonga will hold the second neighborhood meeting on Monday evening, May 2, 1988 at 7:00 p.m. at the Lion s Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. ^ This meeting is•the'follow -up" to the meetiny`of February 1; 1988rwhere traffic concerns were raised by neighborhood residents. These concerni have been studied and 'the Engineering Department will report on the results of the studies and resulting recommendations..; Enclosad is the agenda endthe thteems'to bet presented:, Publicfd ii ssidn will be accepted the If there are any questions regarding this meeting, please contact Chuck Mackey at (714) 989 -1862, Ext. 329. Cordially,, t COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING %NG IIVISIIOOONN P8U1 A NBaf/ City Traffic Engineer PAR:CM: pam ,� c3 CI.�.•rWn 0 J r vi tl• S' 7. Gated Community: This is not feasible because all the public streets in Red Hill would have to be vacated and a homeowners association of ail property owners formed to assume all liability and maintenance costs for the street system. 8 Procedure to apply for assessment district formation to install street lights or sidewalks. 9 Report an study for "no parking" zones other than Alta Cuesta. 10 Report on visibility of traffic control devices and any necessary required trimming of trees and bushes 11. Through traffic impact and discussion of various techniques to reduce through traffic No additional measures, except for street closures or diversions within the Red Hilt Neighborhood and those listed above, are proposed. To insure that all concerns raised at the February meeting are given adequate attention, public discussion will be opened only .after presentation of reports on all the above Items. �0 AGENDA FOR THE MAY 2, 1988 RED HILL NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING f REGARDING TRAFFIC CONCERNS 3 1. Staff recommendation to alleviate the Alta Cuesta width problem 1 identified in the liability safety audit for the California .� Mun:cpal Insurance Authority by removal of barking on one side of . Alta Cuesta instead of either complete par ng removal or s es a s n9 a one -way street, as recoomended in the audit. e w, 2. Discussion of a 35 MPH speed zone survey on Red Hill Country Club c Drive between Foothill Boulevard and Alta Cuesta with the middle curve signed at an advisory speed of 30 MPH. Presently road is an C " unposted, 55 MPH zone. 3. Results of driver compliance to 4 -way stops and the 25 MPH speed Y limit on Alta Cuesta. 3�. r 4. Results of study for more 4 -way stop locations. 5. Speed Bumps: City policy on the installation of speed bumps is that the City does not install speed bumps on public streets. The City Attorney has found speed bumps are not an approved traffic control device for installation on public street because they would result in substantial liability for the City. 6. Increase in the number of 25 MPH speed limit signs to emphasize the residential nature of the Red Hill streets. 7. Gated Community: This is not feasible because all the public streets in Red Hill would have to be vacated and a homeowners association of ail property owners formed to assume all liability and maintenance costs for the street system. 8 Procedure to apply for assessment district formation to install street lights or sidewalks. 9 Report an study for "no parking" zones other than Alta Cuesta. 10 Report on visibility of traffic control devices and any necessary required trimming of trees and bushes 11. Through traffic impact and discussion of various techniques to reduce through traffic No additional measures, except for street closures or diversions within the Red Hilt Neighborhood and those listed above, are proposed. To insure that all concerns raised at the February meeting are given adequate attention, public discussion will be opened only .after presentation of reports on all the above Items. �0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM c,—: - Date: April 18, 1988 To: Mayor, City Council Members and City Mana From. Russell H. Maguire, city Engineer Subject: Red Hill Country Club Drive Realignment to through property at the northeast corner of Foot and Grove Avenue Grove Avenue hill Boulevard At its March 2, 1988 meeting, the City Council considered a requirement for providing a public street (Red Hill Country Club Drive) through the subject property at the northeast corner of Grove Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The alignment for the street is set forth as a part of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The Council's Decision was to allow the owner of the subject property to submit a development proposal for staff review without the street realignment being included and, concgrrently with that development review, initiate as a City project to consider amending the Foothill Boulevard Club Drive with FFoothill connection of could be Red re - examined tin the light of an actual proposal for development of the subject property, as well as for a more detailed review of previous deliberations leading up to the choice of the realignment contained in the Specific Plan. This re- examination was also to include new studies of any alternative connectis which would be necessary on Foothill B ulevardoand in the RedtHill Neighborhooddinithe future. To date, the owner of the subject property has not filed a development for review, thus consideration of a Specific Plan Amendment has not been ini tiated. On May 2, 1988, a second Red Hill Neighborhood meeting will be held-for discussion of the Engineering Division's analyses and recommendations for the concerns about traffic problems expressed by citizens at the first meeting held on February 1, 1988. It will be staff's position that discussion of the Red Hill Country Club Drive realignment at that meeting should not be neld, since any input on that subject should be given at the Specific Plan amendment hearings, when held. RHM:PAR:pam cc Jack Lam Paul Rou�eau, lC� J o.s 1 .., ■ 1, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM '� Date: February 8, 1988 To: Russell H. Maguire, City Enginner From: Paul A. Rougeau, Traffic Engineer By: Chuck Mackey, Associate Civil Engineer !subject: Red Hill Neighborhood Meeting and Traffic Study The first neighborhood meeting to discuss traffic concerns was held February 1, 1988 and attended by approximately 110 people. A Traffic Study will be conducted to answer the concerns raised at the meeting. It is proposed that the results of the Traffic Study be presented to the citizens at a follow up neighborhood meeting scheduled for May-2, 1988. At the February 1, 1988 meeting, residents were informed that Red Hill Country Club Drive (RHCCD) will be realigned to Grove at the time the property at the northeast corner of Grove and Foothill is developed. This information encouraged a very lively discussion. Many residents stated that they did not favor the realignment. Also, staff 4sked for input on either a parking removal for Alta Cuesta -Red Hill Country Club Drive or a possible one -way street syste& and on pedestrian safety. The residents indicated a high concern for the amount and speed of °through traffic° using their neighborhood streets. In regards to this concr we •eceived requests to close Red Hill Country Club Drive to Foothill Boulevard, create other street.diversions and closures, install .peed bumps, over all speed limits to 25 MPH. have more traffic law enforcement, develop a gated community, install more stop signs and many other ideas. Some wanted more street lights and sidewalks while others do not. Some suggest cul- de- sating Red Hill Country Club Drive above Foothill and others disagree strongly. Additionally, at the meeting, we stated that a speed survey for lower Red Hill Country Club Drive and a progression signal timing study for Foothill in the vicinity of Grove are being omould be conducted. a � L^ These concerns will be analyzed and studied. Then results and.' alternative solutions -will be developed, for your review, and reported ;at the scheduled meeting. cc: Mayor and City Council Members Chairman and Members of the Public Safety Commission Lauren Wasserman City Manager Jack Lam, Community Development Director Attachment: Detailed Lists of Concerns ,�-o7 . . i REDHILL SUMMARY ITEMS REQUESTED FOR STUDY Written Reouests No. Item No. of Requests 1. Install Speed Bumps ' I1 2. Close off Red Hi:1 Country Club Drive/ 8 Keep Red Hill Country Club Drive open 1 3. Lower all speed limits to 25 MPH 3 4. More enforcement 12 S. Develop gated community 5 6. Disagree with Red Hill Country Club Drive alignment at Grove Avenue 11 7. Agree with RHCCD realignment to Grove Ave. 1 8. Install No Left Turn during peak hour at Foothill and Red Hill Country Club Drive 1 9. Alta Cuesta - make one -way. 1 10. School bus needs an outlet at Foothill which allows left turns out 1 11. More stop signs 7 12. No Parking Anytime at park on Valle Vista 1 13. Sidewalks - don't want 2 ✓ 14. Street Lights - don't want 2 v 15. One -Way Street - don't want 1 16. Close one end of Alta Cuesta end Red Hill Country Club Drive 3 17. Install sidewalks - all north /south streets 2 r 18. Speed zone lowered on Red Hill Country Club Drive to 25 MPH 1 19. Make Alta Cuesta a toll road 1 20. Make Grove /Foothill 5 legged 1 21 Install Red Hill "Residents Only" Signs 1 22. Install cross - gutters 1 23 Right turn only for NB b SB RHCCO /Foothill 1 eP .r 6 t t q .ti RLDHILL SUMMRRY ITEMS REQUESTED FOR STUDY Written Requests No. Item No. of Requests,-, 24. Install median allowing left turns at RNCCD /Foothill 1 26. For 50 traffic at RNCCO /Foothill, install ramp metering signal I 26. Don't improve access to Foothill 1 24 written responses were received at the meeting. 7 responses have been received since the meeting and are reflected above. ,�G7 I P REDHILL SUMMARY VERBAL REQUESTS FROM MEETING No. Item CIO J 1 1. Lack of sidewalks 2. Lack of space for a school bus stop on lower Red Hill Country Club Drive 3. Close Red Hill Country Club Drive 4. School pedestrian walk in narrow street at Valle vista north of Camino Sur S. Many requests for more speed enforcement 6. Many requests for speed bumps 7. Speed survey for lower Red Hill Country Club Drive 8. More street lights 9. More stop signs 10. Complaints regarding design of curves - lower Red Hill Country Club Drive 11. Study traffic Grove/Red Hill Country Club Drive and Foothill /Grove/Red Hill Country Club Drive 12. What are Rancho Cucamonga's street light standards? 13. Alta Cuesta north of Buena Vista is accident prone 14 biaintenace of streets - cre bus routes considered when assessing repaving priorities? 15. Bushes north of school need to be trimmed 16. How to develop a gated community? CIO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rm cmn as mr. P. a.mmp, cab., 911x4 p11 January 25, 1988 IN Resident/Property Owner in the fled Hill Neighborhood of Rancho Cucamonga SUBJECT: NOTICE OF MEETING Dear Resident: The City of Rancho Cucamonga will hold a,neighborhood oreting on Monday evening, February 1, 1988 at 7:00 P.M. at the Lion's.Com unity Center, 9161 Base Line Road. The meetthg is your opportunity to express concerns about traffic issues in the neighborhood. One issue that City staff wants to discuss is the proposed realignment of Red Hill' Country Club Drive at Foothill Boulevard. A presentation will be made of traffic information in genera , for your neighborhood and for the realignment specifically. Then, the meeting will be open for questions, suggestions and discussion. We will make every attempt to answer any concern expressed and to gather aqy further fnformatien required to address traffic issues. A future meeting will be scheduled to discuss our analysis of any concerns you bring to cur attention. If there are any questions regarding this meeting, please contact Chuck Mackey at 989 -1862. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPORTMENT ^ ENGINEERING DIVISION /NE1 �0 L� Paul City Traffic Engineer PAR:CM:pam cc: Councllmembers Bob Rizzo lack Lam Bnd Duller \ I Clyde Boyd �. Na D,b.► N. W. " Dmd, L Sw OAA"LaiwaH i 1 ll. Jt pTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA by eYle 9n Wf, R,rAn Derma C N." P1110. (71e) 9"4231 September 16, 1989 Ronald Sackett Can Antonio Community Hospital 999 San Bernardino Road Upland, CA 91786 Dear Mr. Sackett: It has come to my attention that you have hired a traffic consultant to prepare a traffic study for the San Antonio Community Hospital's proposed project at Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. It is my understanding this consultant, under your direction, will do a traffic study of lesser scope than the City has required. Please note that this is not acceptable and will probably be a detriment and a delay to your project. The basis of this determination is the City Council action taken at their meeting of Marcb 2, 1988 at which the consideration for realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive was discussed. Since the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan requires the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive across your proposed project, the Mayor and Council set the following requirements for accepting the hospital's project Foothill Boulevard h SpecificosPlanl concerning Ueat different alignment concurrently with their project submittal; 21 that this amendment follow the rtanning Commission process; and 31 that an independent traffic engineer be hired to conduct the necessary study to determine if there are ether alternative alignments for Red Hill Country Club Drive available. The City has previously provided you with a scope of work for this traffic study. Your architect for the proposed project, David Hensel, was recently reminded by Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer, of the City Council's direction fo• an independent, in -depth study. +en.. Dea}aA N. lh . h" Klnt eSV M.yw Devi, L Stint ChWOJ.B~11 Pu WLWAtri La AtWwi ILI Ronald Sackett.' San Antonio Copmunity qospital September 16, 1988 Please 'eConSjdjr our recent decision, and instead of working, independently, work with the City to find -an, indeDeqdent traffic engineer to conduct and prepare a neutral, Independent ana-authoritative traffic study. Cordially, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPPATMENT ENGIM R s. h . qu re qu re City Engineer RHN:CH:pam cc: David Hensel The Wedgewood Group, Inc. 816 N.E. Eighty Seventh Avenue Vancouver, Washington 98664 Mayor Stout and City Council Members Lauren Wasserman, City Manager i� gap-2,i -0 For the September 21, 1988 City Council meeting September 21, 1988 Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members: Not too long ago, we read an article in the Daily Report concerning the proposed Central Park on Baseline and Milliken. We were both surprised and dismayed to learn that the plans for the park were being reconsidered to possibly Include lighted sports fields for organized youth sports. We were surprised that we learned about this in a newspaper article and that even those of us who own residences bordering the park were not informed by official notice that the plans were being opened to discussion and possible major change —were dis- mayed when we realized that the beautiful plans for the City's only adult and family- oriented park were possibly going to be changed to conform to all of the other child - oriented parks in the City. The groups who are advocating addition of sports fields are vocal and well - organized, but surely they do not represent the majority of Rancho Cucamonga's citizens. There are many other appropriate, and probably better locations in the City for sports fields, including school yards and other proposed park sites So far there 1s only one location sot aside to meet the needs of the rest of Ranchn Cucamonga's population= and that is the Central Park as it has been planned after a great deal of time and energy invested by a Representative Citizen Committee and by City employees and elected officials. It seems a shame to Ignore the hard fought findings and decisions of these persons. As part of your constituency, we are asking you to please be the voice of those of us who are not part of an organized group, and to stand b the original, ac- cepted plans for central Park without lighted, youth sports fields. Please help the youth sports advocates to understand that the great need for youth sports fields is a temporary one appearing at this time as a result of the tremendous growth of the City which attracts new younger families Eventually these fami- lies will age and in several decades, the City will be older and those older citizens will have different needs. We need to plan for at least one park which will have a broader, more timeless appeal. People still flock to the Arboretum in Arcadia, Lacey Park in Pasadena and the Huntington Library in San Marino despite the fact that there are no sports fields in those parks. The proposed plan for the Central Park as it already stands would provide this kind of atmo- sphere for the new downtown of our City Again, please be the voice for the rest of Rancho Cucamonga's Citizens and up- hold the dedicated work of the Park's Citizen Advisory Group and that of all of the City employees and elected officials who have been involved in this proj- ect's plans. Thank you For your time Sin erely, ohn Atwater v Karen Atwater 7213 Parkside Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 {U-01"c 80ILM {]YUe c{eulxea Yew .eL.n +. o. +lcl url{a NICHOLS, STEAD. BOILEAU 6 LAMB ...or[ule..I .. ..... I... ATTO..[113 AT l.N m[ ruLr IxnnaraL {.x. er uwa.xu ALl .ur, awn I. I.,... .. t".1 .1. /In86 tl! September 15, 1988 The Honorable Mayor and Members of The City council city of ,Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 or ceu.L[L .eLLnr • xrco e. Of Y.Le R MIL.eI[ lu {rvurn cwnu [ eras lu m•vui .LULL �wv r{. . o Loa LL + 1A r. nru Re: San Antonio Community Hospitals Propoacd Project for the Northeast Corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Ladies and Gentlemen: It will come as no surprise that San Antonio Community Hospital deeply appreciated your most recent action with reference to its proposed project at the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in your City when, on March 2, 1988, you referred the matter back to the Planning commission to consider alternatives to the re- routing of Red Hill Country Club Drive through our property and permitted us to process the application for our project cuntemplating that such a re- routing would not occur. We are pleased to advise that our application is now in process supported by a site specific traffic study in keeping with the mundate of the Council in referring the matter back to the Planning commission. The purpose of this correspondence is to advise that we have been presented with a demand on the part of the Civil Engineering Department of the City which we bal'eve to be inconsistent with the action taken by the Council on March 2, 1988 and with any of the discussion which took place prior thereto. Specifically, we have been asked to fund the cost of an overall traffic analysis for the entire area which would involve a substantial expenditure on the part of the applicant. We would imagine that such a study must have boon performed by or on behalf of the City at the time that the Foothill Boulevard specific plan was adopted recommending the realignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive in the first instance. If uo, it would seem that such a study should provide the data in which your civil Engineering Department demonstrates an interest at NICMOLO. STEAD, BOILEAU- S'LAMB • nw[ruuowu mwn o: wrrowwco AT uW The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City council September 15, 1988 -Page Two- this time. If not, performed, however, it would seem to further place in question the integrity of the proposed realignment through our property. In any event, we would not consider it to be fair or ` equitable for the cost burden of the broader study to be placed .,.� upon the Hospital at this time. As it is our understanding that this matter will be generally discussed at your next regular meeting, we would most appreciate your consideration of our posture on this issue in your discussions. Very truly yours, 4 NICHOLS, STEAD, BOILEAU 6 LAMB A Pr fessional Corporation I � By Donald E. Bollinger ° DEB: rmj cc: Ruse Mcguire Paul A. Rougeau Charles Mackey Brad Buller Ronald Sackett, President - San Antonio community Hospital Donald Bergmann, Vice President - San Antonio Community Hospital Stephen Wheatley- Stephen Daniels Commercial Brokerage w "r of h HO C1fCA�OKC� Lewis Homes Management Corp. SIP p819Ba W 1566Mss Msu.WSA.JPA.9a670 /LV.ACAWm 91715 /714 9110 9n 4y90 1 001Z S September 8, 1988 VIA MESSENGER Mr. Russell H. Maguire city Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Base Line Rd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: TR. 13270, TR. 13273, PH 11341 in Terra Vista Dear Russ: Due to a largo financial loan commitment secured by Lewis Homes for two upcoming apartment projects in Terra Vista (TR. 13270 and TR. 13273), and due to an urgent need to show progress for the upcoming branch of the San Antonio Community Hospital (P.M. 11341), Lewis Homes would like the following to occur: 1. Issuance of the rough grading permit for TR. 13270 and P.H. 11341. This would allow progress to be shown for the hospital site whose fill requirements will be met by grading in the park /detention basin and TR. 13270 areas. Since the final grading plans for the park/detention basin have not yet been submitted to allow final approval of the drainage within Church Straet and TP.. 13270, each sot of rough grading plans so approved will have the following note: "Lewis Development Co. shall be responsible for any revisions to these plans due to any adjust- ments to the off -site drainage system required by the City of Rancho Cucamonga." We are hopeful to begin grading by the week of September 12. 2 Placement of the final maps for TR. 13270 and TR. 13273 on the city council agenda of September 21, 1988. This would allow one of the steps to be fulfilled for the loan commitment, namely a recorded map by the end of September. To do this, approval of the engineering estimates submitted for these tracts to allow posting of the necessary bonds and agreements is required as soon as possible. vo; kX I r September 8, 1988 Mr. Russell H. Kaguire"'y - IV Page 2 :7 KKN/jh cc: ;a(r. Lauren Wasserman, City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr. Jack Lem, City nf Rancho Cucamonga Mr. Brad Buller, City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr. Jerry Grant, City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr Lloyd Goolsby, City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr: Bill Humphrey, Madole & Associates Mr, Dan Thompson, Lawis Homes ,-;Wqj,. 7 j4�, ,,Z44;Tk- V 3. Ins uance of builai;4V.e6it�sby ociober i, 1988,,for TH. 13270 and TR. 13273.v -,,1Fbii',would allow the finai stop to be fulfilled for'thi�:ld&n,`obzmitm&nt., -z understand that as of thin data thase7permits� cannot-be ' f�su6d' and that issuance by the'date of Octabor�'IL%c�nnot,be.-4uirantitid'.- But it,'is hoped that, with. the loubmittal�-6f�,�thi�,,final�--grading plan for the )axk/detitntion�basin.i,thqi,."week;f-of-so teniber 12, the"ifiter- I - � P . related drainagisystazs�fcr.,thsas two;tracts can bef review6d s f uf icisntlyt'-fbr�,k*th-ese% pirmits to' be Issued by the aforementioned.dat�il. These requests are bein*g,asked at this time due to extraordi�iry time constraints which will not occur in�the future once the master plan storm drain issuei�are finally fully resolved within the next few weeks. If you have any questions at all about these requests or the issues invoived, please do not besitate to call mi. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, LEWIS HOMES HANAGEMEhT CORP. Ken Hishikawa Project Development KKN/jh cc: ;a(r. Lauren Wasserman, City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr. Jack Lem, City nf Rancho Cucamonga Mr. Brad Buller, City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr. Jerry Grant, City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr Lloyd Goolsby, City of Rancho Cucamonga Mr: Bill Humphrey, Madole & Associates Mr, Dan Thompson, Lawis Homes ,-;Wqj,. 7 j4�, ,,Z44;Tk- M �:4�n -t38 > � - `.:�4 =vn` '`33b r w � t .2L:r-�- a •Y�a- t - :.r.. DATE: September 21, 1988 f` TO: Rancho Cucamonga City Council =a FROM: Jim Flocker SUBJECT: Proposed historic landmark designation of 7165 Etlwanda' Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga. APM 1227 - 131 -23 ' Attached is the expert opinion letter that I said I would provide during our August 9, 1988 meeting. r 1x� K srRfflMUnE +� DEVELOPMENTS INC September 16, 1988 Mr. Robert C. Flocker 6226 Topaz Street Alta Loma. California 91701 RE: Historical designation of house located at 7165 Edwanda Avenue Dear W. Rocker, You have requested that I review your situation from the perspective of an individual and developer with extensive experience In historical rehabilitations within the Stale of Califon-la. My qualifications include membership affiliations with the National Trust for Historic Preservation, Committee for the Future of America's Past and the Los Angeles Conservancy. My personal experience in historical rehabilitations Include the Pasadena Playhouse hr Pasadena. Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel In Hollywood, and Pacific Coast Stock Exchange Building in Los Angeles, of which I am co- general partner. I have reviewed your documentation, including your letter of August 9 to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in which you offer to donate your house to the City. 1 Commend you for making this generous offer, and would expect the City to respond through unqualllled acceptance. As you undoubtably realize, rehabilitations are expensive ventures, more properly undertaken by either private limited partnerships or government grant, rather than by individuals. You should also be aware that no municipal agency can offer investment tax credits to you or promise that historical designation will increase the value of your property. Quite to the contrwy, you as owner must bear the burden of seeking National or State Register status, then pay the costs of rehabilitation 766N.11OWLIVAGLEENWAY IOSANGIIIS,CA90069 1117)670.7570 ' :)s 't:• IY 'i. x3 )` N+ �1-- ay:�k;.k Yc. e 3 -e -' ...v. _ •- ?4=..: '': �:i.1P? -k s,�.. 3r:;n��a'r� � :�,,-7, �._:';�."�;;.j`:=� +�3^c.',�.�'a -ir :r'.'�...i.`ia �-: 04 toyourselfwbil ur bcne�ts a having no guarantee of receiving sny�eral or'state - - K tl 4y From the develo r .. , . • pez's,perapective „ having'a ehu�,tlrLe'of the type you own on'an oth&vLSe,valuablepitxe`of land conld'eause'you to loos as enormouifi: amotvat” of, %moneyxupon tselltng since any' developer would regard the Cttye.hlstorical designation of the structure as a IlablliLV-to develonmeut -'riot Fin ni vets_ Also. I Sincerely doubt that .you could, eves tt v alined, obtain a listing on the Narional Regieter:x thfS process is Very complicated,' and only those aft-dic rues of unquestionable value nationally are Wreiy to be found to deserve tax credits. i In conclusion, please remember that my' ,commitment to historical n rehabilitations of a legitimate nature.ls a matter of reirord. Iu my- personal opinion, there is not enough money avaflable'in our Country today for saying many wdremely deser%ing structures thai qualify as national treasures. and I would enwurage anyon.e with resources to devote to this worthy activity to be'eertatn that their - funds are spent on preserving'a etructure of unquestionable r national Importance.. I hope the City of Rancho Cucamonga chooses to work with you In the spirit of cooperation and understanding, since you. deserve that treatment for your kind gesture toward your community. Sincerely, vam von Gremp Streamline Developments Sr 5 CM COUNCIL RRQM= 160 Date t 5pntpmhnr 14 . 1g8A Request By:__patfeta d. Wright Staff Coutacted /Iltle: Brad Buller, City Planner Request- 1- STATUS OF THE LABOR CAMP 2. STATUS OF Mn11STR[AL ARFA DFV OPNFNT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET REUff.E 0_AKER ANn ORDVF AVFNLIF .Action By: Staff Action Taken: See attached Date Request Recolued: Department Bead (Signature): cc: City Council Citj Hanger. Immediate Supervisor CITY COUNCIL REQUEST FORM: Paula J. Wright - September 14, 1988 Page 2 - ,1 Action Taken: 1. LABOR CAMP: Attached is A 9115/88 memo from Code Enforcement Superiisor� c ar corn regarding the activity of the labor camp site. In addition it should be noted that there has not been is formal project submitted for the Development Review process on the subject site. ' 2. INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN SUBAREA: Chris Nestman of the Planning Division as men a yro et p anner,on is item and his main contact with the neighborhood has been with a Laurie Torella of 8416 Bowen Street: His last meeting on this matter wa: on August 16, 1988. At that meeting, Laurie Torella submitted a letter outlining collective concerns of the neighborhood for development along 8th Street. (See attached Exhibit A.) Mr. Westman assured her that when development is proposed for this property, her letter would be referenced and all possible solutions would De discussed. Since that meeting staff has reviewed the land use issue and arrived at a list of uses that has been found acceptable by the City and Laurie Torella as representative of the neighborhood. (See Exhibit B.) The Planning Division has now passed this information on to the Engfneering Division. They are currently in the process of encumbering the deed of the property with the modified land uses. This will ensure that when the property 1s to be sold the Council will have the opportunity to review the terms of sale and the deed restrictions concurrently. The minutes of the City Council have also been attached (Exhibit C). In regards to the reference made to uses on 8th Street closer to Vineyard turning junky, the Code Enforcement staff have been directed to review the premises of those properties and to begin enforement immediately where violations are occurring. If I can be of any further assistance olease do not hesitate to call. �r. �r. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 1S, 1988 E� u TO: b:z-d Bu•ler, City Planner FR JM: Richard L. Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor,(, SUITECT: ACTIVITI AT LABOR CAMP SITE J It has been several months since the buildings and sebris were removed from the Labor Camp site. Since that time, various City depertments and outside agencies have been involved with problems mostly resulting from people gathering in this area. Though the housing facility has been removed, transient laborers still use the street frontage on Arrow a4 a pick -up site for daily work. The market/ apartment complex vest of the Labor Camp site is the central congregation point for these laborers. This too is a carryover from the previous camp operation. Even though this is a separate property, it is often confused by local residents as being the Labor Camp facility Until such time as this location gi•,es way to new developments, it will be difficult to eliminate this as a pick -up point for laborers. After the •:losure of the camp, Code Enforcement was involved in removing abandoned vehicles, and assisting Building and Safety in elimination of structures and debris. At this time, there are no structures remaining on the site; only slabs, foundation and paving remain This process was essential to prevent persons from taking up residence in vehicles or building remnants The cactus grove along the east prolarty line has recently been used as a campground for transients The Public Works crews have been called upon on two occasions to haul away discarded furniture and other items in order to dismantle the campground. This response has been effective in reducing the numbers of persons lingering on and near the Lahr Camp site. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) has monitored this site and occasionally will do a sweep for ilegal aliens This occurred most racently on September 14, 1988 An inspection of the area the folowing day found no persons lingering near the aria. This would seem to shov that tho bulk of the persons who frecp:ent this location in order to find work do not have legal residence status. Contact with the INS has determined that periodic activity such as this re ^ent sweep utilizes the eyfent of their manpower and resources. Though they have agents wno frequent our City, their actions are limited to high yield situations 2 Memo to Brad Buller',_ •- September 15, 1988 "•- - ' Page Two 4 :n Many of the traneiontc �. vnen^ forced to move from the Labor,, Camp took �' up residence within the adjacent residential districte.;Scmi4moveBiin ,K-'r with friends hnd, family, owhile ottiers•rentod out portio ns,oftihomes: '- The number of illegal• , garago 'rconv_erslons'. being reported tof Code kr" Enforcement increased = 'in,this area-of the City'.immediately.•after the camp closure. Many of theso`complalnts center,-' onj- large,` numbers- of persons living in what scould be--considered substandard conditlofis. "A Correcting these violaticns is- .difficult, at- 'bast,. as enforcer_ent =c displaces individuals and families' that literally have no place5t. go. Though Code Enforcement' continues working to resolve these issues, the demand for housing encourages new violations. The clo.,ing of the Labor Camp eliminated substandard living conditions and related problems which vere occurring on the site. To date, the Labor Camp site is used as a gathering place'for transient laborers, periodically as an illegal camping area, and is frequently loe a thoroughfare for persons walking to and from'Foothill Boulevard. To a certain extent the same types of problems such as illegal aliens, overcrowding, loitering, crime, etc. have moved Into the surrounding residential area. The market /apartment complex still cerves as a focal point for laborers looking for work, and is subject to frequent patrol by the Sheriif's office. A final resolution to this matter will require constant diligence in dealing with all the _f related issues. This band -aid approach is necessary until'new development displaces the historical use of the property. ;7 ELA:nas cc: Otto Krcutil, Deputy City Plannar 9• City of Rancho Cue amonga P.O. Boa 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Co. 91730 %r Attention, Planning Department Rot Property located on Eighth Street east of Grove, vest of Baker The residents adjacent to the property listed above have concerns regarding the use and architectural design of the buildings. We feel that the City of Rancho Cucamonga Is interested in keeping up the .t residential value of property. However, we are concerned with the out come of the buildings in quentlon. Listed below are some of the ideas and concerns the residents 1 would like the City of Rancho Cucamonga to consider. The landscaping should be compatible with surrounding residential property. There is a problem w -ih graffitti, therefore it should be taken into consideration when planning. It should be designed to create vieusl interest and variety to the streetscape and also conceal from view automobiles and service areas. Blank building walls should be minimized also to Prevent 6traffitti as well as preventing the area to becoming "industrial ". The business located east of Baker and Heat of Vineyard are landscaped very nicely, however the property listed above should be landscaped with the residents in mind. We do not want.it to look like when we and our guests are entering an industrial compound. The City has been improving all the inlets to the city. The improvements to Haves Baseline and Archibild are beautiful, its what all the residents like to see. However, we should be taken into consideration as wall. When we and our guests enter the city by way of Baker Avenue, we should be proud of the beautiful landscaping and architecture. In the last 10 years we have lived In this neighborhood, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has done nothing to improve the property in question. Lighting should be of great concern, due to the residential area right behind the proposed buildings. There is going to be an alley behind the new buildings which could propose problen3t for the residents and well as passing children. We feel that this is a major problem, and should have great con- sideration while planning. 1,F F ■_ + Wo want to see security lighting between the new buildings and .i the homes adjacent. Also, there should be landscaping behind the new buildings to minimize the industrial look. - We the residents hope the City of Rancho Cucamonga will'take into consideration the homeowners situation. We have a great investment _ with our property and we ask the city to woek with us on this project. + ■ i, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: August 19,1988 �I D 19' TO: Russ Maguire, City Engineer FROM: Chris Restman, Assistant Planneroif RE: CITY PROPERTY AT 8TH ARo BAKER i have completed a list of acceptable uses for the property at 8th and list ath oug compiled withineighborhoodarepresentatives. Those uses are: Permitted uses: motive /Light Truck Repair -Minor - ding Centraetor's Offices uing ana ugnt Equipment Supplies and Sales ness supply Retail Sales and Services ness Support Services ng and Drinking Establishments it Services nistrative Civic Services nistrative and Office essional/Design Services is Storage al Care motive Service Station entente Sales and Services icial, Insurance and Real Estate Services ..a e_.._____ .. neeical /Health Care services Personal Services Public Assembly Automotive/Truck Repair Major Please let me know what procedures must be followed at this time or if there are any questions that I can answer. CR:mlg r, (21) (22) City Council Hinutas' ` J,wsry 20, 1988 Pag3 12 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -040 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TBk CITY 0! RANCSO CUCAMOMCA, COUNTY OR SAN BEANARIINd, ,STATE Cr CALIPORW.A, 0gDRRI G TO RR VACATED, A POITION Or THE NON- VEHICULAR ACCESS RIGHTS ON FOOIHILL BOULEVARD, S37`MM SPRUCE AND SIX AVENUE$ MDTIONI Novod by Wright, seconded by Suquet to approve Revolution Number 88- 040. lotion carrird 4 -0-1. (Kin absent) A * * * e a =2— - A request cc amend the,0evelopmeot District Nap fromm Lw Density Residential (2-4 dwalllnt units pat• acre) and Medium High to* Low Residential to Cameral -Industrial, Subarea 1, for 4.31 acres of land, located north of dth, east of Crove Avenue and wear of Baker Avenue - APES 207 - 541-60 and 207 - 231 -12. (0203 -09 DD ALBS) Staff rcport by Chris Uutmen, Arsiatsnt Planner. Mayor Stout opened the nesting for public hearing. Thera being no response, the public haeing vas closed. Councilmamber Wright stated she had talked with the vesidants of this area and expressed they would like to limit the users and do some landaeapinG. She felt that a lit of the residents would probably show up for the second rsding if this ordinance. Deputy City Clark, Debbie Ada=, rate the titles 01 Ordiosnee Nos. 333 and 336. OP:IINASCE NO. 335 (first reading) AN , OP Pfd CAL17ORNIAIPORNZA CITY 000aCIL OF In CITT OF ILIMCSO CUCAMONGA, APP 8O7ISO UFVnOPMTNT DISIRICI CBANGS N0. 87 -10, REQUESTING A CHANCE IN THE DISTRICT DE310MI011 FROM MEDIUM -HICS AND LOW RESIDENTIAL fO INDOSTR= SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NORTH OR 8TH STREET BAST OF GWVE AVEUOS AND WEST 04 BAEQC AVENUE - AFH 207- 541 -60 AND 207 - 231 -12 exceed Subarea I Ito include 4.31 request cres of lend generally[ located east C1Crove Avenue, north of 8th Street and vest of Baker Avenue - APNr 2D) -541b0 and 207- 271-12 (0203 -05 ISP AMEN) r City Council Minutes February 79 )SS paze 11 't OP RMI APBg06 - APM 207- 541-60 F 207 - 251 -12 Mayor Stout opered the meeting l,m public comment. Addressing Couaeil vast Caroltn Lra.ue, 8731 C�hsffey Street, Zena6o Cuunonga, representing a =Jority of the resUents in the neipborhood. They did not feel the City @bowed enough interest is the residents in the southwest portion of the City. They were concerned with the brilding design add paaittsd uses, landscape which would compliment the residential area. visual quality of ' the streetseapae, and the problem of graffiti. -hay weatwd to have included in the permitted uses the following: Administrative Offices; Professional and Design Servieeai Financial. Insuraneea and Zeal Batats '• Services; Personal Serviced Business and Support Services; Recreational ri Facilities; and Pro_fecaional Offices. -? There being no further public input. Mayor Stout slaved the meeting. Councilman Buquat suggested that ve consider only the portions owned by the City have staff do the necessary work to put in elate the restrictions which were discussed early, and notify the private property owners that we did not consider their parcel as pert of the change. Ila stated further w can then invite them, if they wish to pursue thisp to cow to and talk with staff+ with the idea in mind that a Development Agraemeut be entered into on those rites. Councilman Cing stated he felt more eomlortable, at the present tiwt if we dropped this for ore. If someone "a inbrevted at a later tineg than ve could auto; Into a Development Agreement at that time. Couneilwaan vcigbt expressed that ve should deal with the issue now because the current zoning was not arceptable. The area did need to be changed, and it needs to be done uhile we nave the input tell the interest of the citisenr of tbtt area. Thera was eoaearu because the neighbors were not aware that the property to the nest bad been toned industrial. Since they are now aware dad want to give their input$ we need to act on it nov. Sba was in favor of listing the permitted uses in the CUR'■ with the input of the neighborhood residents. She further concurraJ the property should be split. Councilwomaa Bra" expressed she did not feel the property should be split. It would tot be a saleable piece of property and if end many restrictions were placed on it$ it might not sal]. emayor Stout felt something should be done now. M-. Buller, City Planner, runested the item return to the Planning Cmvaiatinn fcr an e•aluatiou of the resident's proposal since the Planning Consission did not consider splitting the properties. city Council Minutes February 3, 1988 Page 12 Mr. Harioaxn, City Attorney, read the amended title* of Ordinance Nos. 335 so a 336 for a now first raadirg. s: ORDINANCE 50. 335 (first reading) L AN ORDI"CK OF TIM CITY JOUNCIL OF •INK CITY OF RANCHO is CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DHVALOPNXT DISTRICT CH"GK NO. 87 -10, AEQORSTINO A CBANGK IN TER DISTRICT DKSIGRATION j• PROM MEDIUK -SIGH AND LOW RKSIDRNTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC _ PLAN LOCATED NORTH OF BTU STREET AND KST OF EASE AVENOg- A. =N 207 - 541-60 r ORDINANCE NO. 336 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF T0< CITY COUNCIL OF TU CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TNDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMINDWWr 87 -03, REQUESTING AN ADDITION TO SUSARIA ONE LOCATED NORTH OF SIR STARES AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN 207 - 541-60 MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buguet to waive full reading of the extended Ordinance Moo. 335 and 336, assd set second reading for February 17, 1988. Motion carried unanimously 5 -0. eeA••• Mayor Stout called a recess at 8:15 P.M. The mating reconvened at 8t25 P.M. with all mobers of the Council project. ey+a•• a a a • • • H. ALR321M PUBLIC HU L13M (30) El. JVVIEONMENIAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL Ds2 PRUrtT N7-M - A➢eelt. - MY L LUima cmuacR - An appeal with respect to the use of root tile and the CC716 of Vista Streat with a taopovary cu2-de -sac, for the development of a 4,900 sq • foot sanetvary building sad a 2,300 square foot office and classroom builds 5 acres of land in xba Vary Low Residential District (lass shoo 2 dwelling wits sera) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at 6723 Etivanda Avenue - APN 2 6January 1 -0]. (Continued from January 6, 1988.) Staff reports presented by Debn 19 Ae*a.iata Planar, regarding the roof tile and by Barbara Erall, Assistant Civr eginser, regarding Vista Street. (0701 -06 APPEAL) Mayor Stout opened the meatiog for public Lisa ' . Addressing Council wares William Ryan of William Ryan, Inc., doafgner he church, stated they were appealing the use of roof tile be they fa t wood shake would I City Council Minutes February 17, 1988 Page 13 OROINANCE NO. 335 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REQUESTING APPROVING A C ANGE IN ETHER DISTRICT NO. LOW RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED NORTH CF 8TH STREET AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN 207- 541 -60 u.�.�,� w�w+unw - A request to amend the - n us r a pet c ai expan u area to nc ude 2.31 acres of land generally located north of Street and west of Baker Avenue - APN 207 - 541 -60. (0203 -05 Sp AMEN) '. ORDINANCE NO. 336 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REQUESTING . AN ADDITION TO SUBAREA ONECLOCATED ORTH OF 8TH STREET AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN 207- 541 -60 a Councilwoman Wright stated she had pulled this item because there were certain 'j assurances made at the last hearing, and she wanted to make sure those things were going to be guaranteed. Mr. Lam stated that these are done by deed restrictions which will be done separately. The City Council will see all of these things before anything happens to that property. Councilwoman Wright expressed she was hoping that both things would be happening Y at the same time, so if there was any problem with the deed wit would not be stuck with the Industrial zoning. She asked if there was any poseibllity that this could be accomplished. Mr. Lam responded that we could if that's what Council wished. Mr. Buller elaborated it would take staff about a month to prepare this and before staff could do anything with that property, it would have to be approved by the City Council. Hr. Harkman stated the only way we can be assured of this would be to put the restrictions in the grant deed. Since the City already owns the property, we can 11mit the uses through the transfer process regardless what is in the Specific Plan. If we approve this now, it would be ersier to market the property then we could explain the zone restrictions. if we leave It zoned this way, a developer may pass on the property, Councilwoman Wright expressed she felt satisfied that her concerns are being taken care of. ,+ - --• wcu.. T�[10 MARKMgN 0 RRCZYNsK2 - - • P.02,03a COWID M ' • NUMBER ON[ C RVK O[NTLIR pbtl[ Jg196 N•P 601t 100 ANOR[.t V.MCnNBNI \ \�J1 \I ONK CAL1106MIA 92022-106, N O'C p.MAMOON i[t[tM ON[(IH.) Bp• Otpl MARINA JO OE LL[N BBII y� r a� MEMORANDVM TO: Mayor Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Pro Tom Pamela J. Wright, Council Mombera Charles J. Buquet, Deborah Brown and Jeffrey King and City Manager Lauren WaasOrman 4 PROM: Martha eoislor Patterson, Deputy City Attorney DATEDt September 9, 1918 RE: Val Foth a Sons, Inc, v. City of Rancho Cucamonga San Bernardino County Superior Court No. 40925 The purpose of this memorandum is to request y authorit to Cottle the above- referoncod lltigatlon for the Sum of $38,341.00. amount owedhto lawsuit sonsoAS a result Ofeworkaperfo that on the North Town Phase IV Street improvement performed dispute in this lawsuit has revolved around e O Project. The Owing to Val Path. Val Path claims that the city xowed awell t over $100,000.00. On SOptnmbor 7, 1988, we attended an arbitration hearing for the purposes of having an arbitrator resolve those issues. The arbitration AIRn+'�+v1NURr91y ♦f„. ),n „rp lasted for * attorney for Val Foth and this Office determinedithat,.withh. the exception of Val Pothl: claim that it was entitled to $500.00 per day of delay in completion of the contract, we were not very far apart regarding the amount duo and owing to Val Path 6 Sons. Val Path agreed to drop the claim for the $500.00 par day, and we began discussing specific items that Val Foth claimed were duo. At the end of the discussions, it was determined that its could agree that we owed Val Path the GUM of $35,341.00. but Claimedhthattwenowed interesttonathatdamount. We disputed the interest claimed on the entire amount; however, duo to the foot that :Inca commencoment of the lawsuit, it was clear that the city ow¢d at least $15,000.00, we believe that Val Path Memorandum to. Hombara Soptombar g, 1988 Pago TWO R Ie'MgN &1 qRr: >YNRK T r CC the City Council and City Manager ahou3d receive interna• on that on that sun for•�tvo` Years _amou�tilto0n0'00 cum, The at the legal rate of interest. approximate,. interest and Honte Preacher.tll °agree that�orofote Y $9,000.00 t. Would be•a tail, dottlesent Of ti 0 Mr' eonger; ayeolt - this disput -uurs of $98,941.00 conaeasionrh eaohing that figure, both aides made Yeas and rsduobdlaQ�eral- claims °significant) nutto ue that waive any right.td ettorneyal this figure reflects',a fair y - We believe rosolut;on of this matter. related zn °rder to alleviate the eity,o liability on a L49 I, the' oi' u may pA a "to the' attorney for Val h �� gr ed t at at Ranaw Martinez tromrtinuz Concrete -the th haO agreed that the tl notice, (undo that ware bola held BUM due and owing Y.artinoz That money has et all times boon pallocatedoto stop Hartinoz Concrete ha6aA the contracts gress agalnat the City: greed that to dismiss onto. 02,200.0 92,200.00. This settlsmcnt then 661 in return forath_e isum of Cucamonga of potential claimshon bshaltoo the cit of 510 ,000.00 and n Clain from behalf of Concrete In Rancho of 529,000.00. in exeoas n the sun equitable to b °Novo that this oottloment will be lair and You accept "In sutblomontancho Cucamonga and rocomnend that Sons in the sum of S98 and authorize sun cP S2.20o.n0. .941.00, and to HartlneznCenoroto In the seating to e a Ww Vi��• ^� ^111Ygp t Duos this matter should you have n at- *h. HOPtpmm S \198 \HCCFOTH\ a I.d p, is i, I ' a; 4- R 5.w PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED CHANGES TO CENTRAL PARK Is cur opinion as homeowners. who will be directly affected by tae e proposed changes to Centre, Park, that we strongly oppose y re- desiyning -hat would eliminate the lake and open apace and replace them with sports. Host of us. having lived in our homes less than one year. are alreadY aware of the noise which carries from the traff, c on Baseline Road. A highly developed spectator sports compl ?x will greatly inc ease the noise facto[ by the arrival and departure of the spectators and the shouting ighting proposcheering 1 glaring ntohour ; games. beck•rds enOgcur homes; most Of the � homes that would be affected have bedroom windows facing the park. we ree Ogni:e that there is fl necd ity. We support ppoor`otthsoccer City aCounciltbaIn ftelis jr our commun aggressively pursuing a cell though t cut Plan to provide for -hose activities; however, we demand that Central Park not be a .?. e1 ti t weans of findinr, a quick sOlu *ion which 1111 so j,E •se•^+a� (ffectl million,. of dollars of homee entlal real estate r;Y :ERS AGA:NST THE RE- DESIGNING OF CENTRAL PARK TO 1;ICLUDE A .: FELL 'GaPLERt 70417 Cdr ,PeEtt /oL ,e C 9170 / 949-VP/3 STREET A PHONE w gl et r'13`j STREET ADDRESS 6 eli'J[" Jo9o�_Q�S63 STREET ADDRt55 L PHr.NE 00 O GlarnAY i 1. �ig� G�1� STREET ADDRESS S PHONE tkoA� STREE -. ;,_DRESS 6 HOt:E i logo C�1wb 6180 S'REc A= 'DRESS > PHOt1E 1105 S RE A: DRESS pH NE : -cam A:.�RESS Ph.••E STREE A0-RE3S L PH PETITION AGAINST PROPOS.13 CHANGES TO CENTRAL PARK I• :s our opinion as homeowners, who will be directly affected by •(,e proposed changes to Central Park, that we strongly oppose any re- deslgning that would eliminate the lake and open space and re;lace hem with sports fields. Most of us, having lived In our noires .Ass than one year, are already aware of the noise which carries from the traffic on Baseline Road. A highly developed s ;ectator sports complex will greatly Increase the noise factor ;•.e arr.va, end departure of the spectators and the shouting ana = heertrg during the games. The night lighting that Is I rroyosed w... g.are Into our backyards and our homes; most of the -cmes t;,at would be affected have bedroom windows feting the reco;-. ce -hat there is a reed for both soccer and softball t s 1. -.r community. ce support the city council in a:, -e:s: e y purs6ing a well thought out plan to provide for ' _se ac• V ties; however, we demand that central Park et �e w • as a means of finding a quick solution whlc* -i _ `•- afar- oi..lons of dollars of resldentia. rem estate rali.les who live in those homes. -" '!:ST 'HE RE -C ns iGNi Ifc j]l.It r ^r-- . 7 1671 i �r NO of CENTRAL PARS ^" !DE A STR.:FT ADDRESS a PHONE �/,/_ •p'i�' S.REET .•:,DPESS 6 PHONt 7674/11)!iA11-1 i 5 -rE AJ -RESS - PH- :.E L. .,w 9� spy : -LPESS �Jt�2 � /iYl� GY4-Sa6cr -hla-v Et= 9 ?7 3139 5 -;Er- AJ:RESS ".d;hE ss r%z /, /" o r- S -REE7 A :LRE5S 4 Pr E ,)7f._a1 1}1(7r Ct 94u_7zss' S -RI.E- A::PESS , PH-ONE �yI 5� i PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED CHANGES TO CENTRAL PARK .s our opinion as homeowners, who will be directly affected by the proposed changes to Central Park, that we strongly oppose any re- resigning that would eliminate the lake and open space and rep.ace then with sports fields. Most of us, paving lived in our tomes less than one year, are already aware of the noise which carries from the traffic on Baseline Road. A highly developed spectator sports complex will greatly increase the noise factor by the arrival and departure of the spectators and the shouting art cheering .luring the games. The night lighting that Is proposed will glare into our backyards and our homes; must of the homes -hat would be affected have bedroom windows facing the paCK. Ve recognize that there Is a need for both soccer and softball r.e ds in our community. We support the City Council In algrassively pursuing a well thought out plan to provide for r.cse activitiesl however, we demand that Central Parr. no- be a.t<:�, as a means of finding a quick, solution which will so affect millions of dollars of residential real estate ' • ran,. fam ... as who live in those homes. _.« E -S A ;A.NS^ THE RE- DESIGN;NG OE CENTRAL PARK TO 1 :X' -UDC A ' l Li u �yyr« S RLL1 ADORES. � PHO.,L � 44'S3s� STREET' AELRESS 6 PHO :iL- /0%3/ FoRDyA.y CTL�C STREET ADDRi.S ?..n PH^�t.E S -REE- A--DRESS e ph:NE 5 -REe AJCRESS P80::E STREET 1401, i s `A t' ` r' - r].Ir y, y PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED CHANGES TO CENTUL PARK it is our opinion as homeowners, who will be directly affected by the proposed changes to Central Perk, that we strongly oppose any re- designing that would eliminate the lake and open space and replace them with sports ]Fields. Most of us, having lived in our homes leas than one vear. are already aware of the noise which carries from the traffic on Baseline Road. A highly developed spectator sports complex will greatly increase the noise factor by the arrival and departure of the spectators and the shouting and cheering during the games. The night lighting that is proposed will glare into our backyards and our honest most of the homes the- would be affected have bedroom windows facing the park. we recognize that there is a need for both soccer and softball fie.ds In our community. We support the City Ccuncll in aggressively pursuing a well thought out plan to provide for those activities: however. we demand that Central Park not be aitertd as a means of finding a quick so.ution which will 30 adverse.y affect millions of dollars of residential real estate an] 1�e -.any families who live in those homes. n ^::E d;E;C AGA1175T 'HE RE- DESIGNING OF CENTRAL PARK TO iSCLVOE ? 5-r R'c F 2 -0 - ^HPLEX: p�c � SiRn:: ADDRESS 6, PHONE -"E e \ cL�tt Et L Lo lege " rn.P1J// w ez STREET ADDRESS G PHONE STREE- ADDRESS 6 Pr!06? 124q.67e7 /CS00 -'�?dlloal al At Zx STR =E7 'DR -SS S PHOI ;-- ngLr(o RESS i PRONE ST;LE7 ADDRESS S PHON1 /v STREET ADDR S Nn?1 / STREET nc3DRFSS & PHONE /6) a /5- /;- )k)�/rl I �5' S' STREET A:DR:.sb & PHO..L °e6' "i v'. a�i 'b•.caQ +d `y t .•:U ti. � .r.- _ PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED CHANGES TO CENTRAL PARK P:Y; "• It is our opinior as homeowners, who will be directly affected by Y3 the proposed changes to Central Park, that we strongl- oppose any re- dezigninj that would eliminate the lake and open space and rep,ace them with sports fields. Most of us, having lived in our hones less than one year, are already aware of the noise which carries from the traffic on Baseline Road. A highly devoloped spectator sports complex will greatly increase the noise factor by the arrival and aerarture of the spectators and the show 1ng and cheering during the games. The right lighting the, is proposed will glare into our backyards and our homes: most of the 'comes that would be affected have bedroom windows facing the we recognica that there is a neen fnr both soccer and softball fields in our community. We appport :he City Council to a {grassively pursuing a well trought out plan to provide for Lose ac ivitlesl however, we demand that Central Park not be a tared as a means of finding a quick sclation which will so advetse.y effect millions of dollars of residential real estate ant he rare frm.11es who live in those homes. 47NECw::EPS AGAINST THE RE- DESIGNING SFC,•TS I'E..C• COHPLEXt :: A'IEV eb OF CENTRAL PARK TO 1NCLVDE A 7M-1 L5c-Mge, ,7 71 77: STREET ADDRESS S PHONE >61'9 Q-z sa STREET ADDRESS S ?HOt1E STREET ADDRESS b PHOt1E 7�7G �,.fCA• %are c•.cr� STREET ADDRESS L P40NE 7o Ks STRL� STREET ADD ESS b PaCt:'c wee / STREL- ADDRESS 6 PHCNE r -s PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED CHANGES TO CCNTRAL PARK :t is our opinion as homeowners. who will be directly affected by the proposed changes to Central Park, that ve strongly oppose any re- iesigning that would el(linate the lake and open space and replace then with sports fields. Host of us, having lived In our hones less than one year, are already aware of the noise which carries from the traffic on Baseline Road. A highly developed stecrator sports complex will greatly increase the noise factor oy 're arrival and departure of the spectators and rho shouting and cheering during the games. The night lighting that is proposea will glare Sato our backyards and our hoo_si most of the hcmes that would be affected have bedroom windows ficing the ptr.. We recognize that there Is a need for both sower and softball .le 1s r ��r community. We support the City Councl: in a.li:essive.y pursuing a well thought out plan to provide for those a.trvitiesi however, we demand that Central Parx not be a, e•ed as a means of finding a quick solution which will so dd:ers- v affect mill -ions of dollars of residential real estate std -he n.any families who live in those homes. rnS THE REDESIGNING OF CENTRAL PARK TO INCLUDE A c _T�ltrf SIRE ADDRE ;S L PHONE 7 -L,1t' e %STREET ff-Ssy7y, `� � ^SS38 STREET ADDRESS /% PH01:E STREE ^. ADr L PHONE 71�Pm o6, o 1 F S ^REST A..DR3 SS L HONE 1 � S.RZF_' Ate_ D: CSS `. Pn':Jz 1:. ob'1 rnvFp ✓- 9rfY-SBS�' 5 -I 'ET AJ :Re -:.5 a ?HONE STREET AO:RESS A PHm.- sso PETITION AGAINST PROPOSED CHANGES TO CENTRAL PARK. It to our opinion as homeowners, who will be direc'ly affected by The proposed changes to Central Park. that we afro igly oppose any re- designing that would eliminate the lake and open space and rej. -ace them with sports fields. Most of us. having lived in our hcties less trail one year, are already aware of the noise which carries from the traffic ur. Baseline Road. A highly developed spectator sports complex will greatly Incrrase the nolse facts: by the arrival and departure of the spectators and the shouting and cheering during the gases. The night lighting that is prcposel will glare Into our backyards and our homes; most of the homes that would be affected have bedroom windows facing the par.. We recognize that there is a neud for both soecet and softball fie.is _n air community. We support the City Counrll in aggressively pursuing a well thought out plan to provide for ^.ose activitiest however, we demand that Central Park not be a. ered ea a means of finding a quick solution which will so a verse.•: affect millions of dollars of residential real estate a -I • , many families who live to those homes. `:r :';iNERS AOAINST THE RE- DESIGNING OF CENTRAL PARK TO INCLUDE A SO,;;-S F :.'-.L: COMPLEX -- '-11-e� Alta - )IM 6 Gw St 1-44-6704- S7;ZEET ADDRLSS A PH;NE oc� - 9�0 96 STR ^cET ADDRES 6 Pi:)NE _j 1191 � lo. Sp. 9da- -4H4,y STREET ADDRESS o Fh ::IE 94v -.? (r vPH S-. RFE' ADDRESS 3oyr C� ca�o C 9e9 dba I S-RE ADDRESS a PeJhE S -REE- A:.JRE55 6 FhO.•F d" 9�9 =6 rv8 0 '&116s0e Y ,4 {Y. �a 9� l PETITION AGAINST PROPOoED CHANGES To CENTRAL PARK It is oar oPinion,as homeowners, who will be directly affeccttednby the prCp03ed changes to Central 1 -8rk, that we strongly oppose - e- ]es.gning that would eliminate the lake and open. space and rep a -a them with sports fields. awarelofnthe noise lwh ch homes less than one.-Year, _� developed t .e9 iCOm the traffic on Base'ine Rincrease the noise fACtOr spe:tator sports comP•ex w11E greatly _ 13 u,e arrival and departure of the spec night slighting shouting hat is and - l,e?ring during the games- the nomes9e thatl, wogl4 into our have bedroom `windows, facing she pert. we recognize om that community9 aAe need supporto, the soccer City and Counciltra 11, fie.d9 out plan to provide 'for aglressively pursuing a ' + =11 though' be ,,.se activities, however we demand that Central ark will so a.tered as a means of finding a Quick solution aret.te many familiesl who lived in those homes. residential real estate homes t h HE:N1:ERS AGAlN ?T THE RE-DESIGId ING OF CENTRAL PARK TO INCLUDE A S'i'r ^5 F ELD = :HPLEXt - A�iD o'RoNt i STREET ,ADDRESS G PHGNE ,?o -E053 STREET ADDRESS 4 rH NE li .211/ .6 STREET ADt RES5 6 PHOII: ' - �Y rV — STRLE^ AGGR SS 6 FrlO,lt. ! ! g �i e! t) / _ �..QZ�OSi S ^FEE' ADDRESS a PHOIIE /z/.3 ��or i ie ! <�3�o-s9li STREET ADRESS 1113 Z' STREET ADDRE -`S L PHONE Af-K tti rcK ��- suns -,o i 1 ItiG STFEET AGDRE55 ,: PHChe, in���l8�t aK Pt Sys P13 STREET ADCRESS G Pll ^E �.7.,. 707.3 u V�? R2; A ft 't N , " " K�J�at4ji"L cp< oinol r-f a-C N