Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1988/10/19 - Agenda PacketY J r CI'T'Y COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays — 7:30 p.m. October 19, 1988 Lions Park Community Center 9161 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamon8a City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, srarY• Pamela J. Wright, m- o•PoT- Deborah N Brown, co.,ran.�+sr• Charles J. Buquet, aoul/munbr• Jeffrey King, co..rn.•.e.. Lauren M. Wasserman, crrt .sre +ou• James Markman, Gy Anw Y Beverly A. Authelet, cily er.•e City Mr.. 989.1851 Dons Put 980.3145 �y4 �.Y . S{ , City Council Agenda d' e'�4�3, October 19, 1988 PAGE ' 1 All items submitted for the City Cowaeil Agenda rut be in writing. The, deadline for submitting th4ise items is 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clark's O -face receives all such items. A. CAIJ. TO ORDP.R 1. Pledge of Allegiance to Ptac. 2. Roll Call: Brown ,_, Buqu4t _�, Stout __, Ring _, and Wright ^. A. AitOUC1.HRM/P114111fATIOiS 1. Presentation of ten year pins to Dennis L. Stout, Mayor, and Charles J. Buquet, Councilman. 2. Presentation of a Proclamation to Mark Lorimar for big hard work and service while employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C. CONSIST CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and mn- coutrwarsial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one Liam without dincusai Any item may be removed by a Coutwilmember or umber of the audioace for discussion. 1. Approval of Warrants, Register Mos. 10/5/88 and 1 10112/88, and Payroll ending 9/29/88 for the total amount of $114110252.37. 2. Approval to authorize the assignment of an adult 10 crossing guard to the corner Church Street and Center Street for Dona Merced Elementary School. 3. Approval to authorize tb3 assignment of an adult 12 crossing guard to the corner of Hermosa Avenue and Peron Boulevard for Cucamonga Elementary School. 4 Approval to annex a portion of the San Bernardino County 14 unincorporated area located north of Highland Avenue, south of tFe logical extensim to Summit Avenue, east of the Day Creek utility corridor, and vest of the County /City boundary - APM 225- 161 -19, 329 33, 349 35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55, and 61. PAGE City Council Agenda //A,/�n- Cetober 19, 1988 2 d RESOLUTION NO. 88-611 16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ANNESATION 88-01, ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS THE AREA GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENU3, SOUTH OF THE LOGICAL EXTENSION TO SMUT AVENUR, EAST OF THE DAY CREEK UTILITY CORRIDOR, ANr WEST OF THE COUNTY /CITY BOUNDARY, ANNEXED TO THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MARE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 5. Approval to purctsee a John Dear Model 510 25 Backboe /Loader from Whitney Machinery, Ins. of Riversido, :n the amount of $64,525.38 to be funded by I.C.S. Account 72 -4W -7045. 6. Approval to reclassify the Resource Service Department's 27 Senior Office Assistant to Administrative Analyst, to be funded from Account No. 33 -4130 -1100. 7. Approval to award the "Street Light Inventory° project 28 to BSI Consultants, Inc. in thu amouit of $14,780 0131436 plus LOT contingency) to be funded as follows: Lighting District it - 55,4130 -6028 $4,172.00 Lighting District /2 - 56,4130 -6026 $4,565.60 Lighting District }3 - 57 -4130 -6028 $3,910.40 Lighting District 14 - 58.4130 -6028 $1,788.80 Lighting District i5 - 59 -4130 -6028 $ 343.10 S. Approval of the encumbrances from FY 87/88 and 30 Appropriate the foods to the account as outlined in the 1 report. 9. Approval to authorize an appropriation from the 37 available fond balance of the Central and ICS Funds for the purchase of a 1987 Ford Tempo CL from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. 10 Approval to avard the vehicle purchase to Dieterich 38 International TrucV Sales, Inc. of Colton in the amount of $29,773.36 for the purchase of one 1400 Metro Van II to be funded from account camber 01- 4647 -7045 and I.C.S. d 1 s City Council Agenda October 19, :988 PAGE 11. Approval to award the vehicle purchase to Enterprise 41 : Chevrolet of Upland in the amount of $66,454.80 for the purchase of oue,Utility Mini -Van, one 7 rassenger Mini- Van, me Coepact 4 Wheal Drive Utility Vehicle, one Compact 2 Wheel Drive Vehicle, and one itid -Sire Extended Cap Pick -up to be funded from various accounts. 12. Approval to award the vehicle purchase to Colley Auto 44 Cara, Inc. of Glendora in the amount of $38,163.18 for the purchase of 2 3/4 ton Pick-ups with modifications to be funded from account numbers 01- 4647 -7045 and 13. Approval to execute Contract Change Order: No. 5 (CO 87- 47 20) for a Professional Services Agreement with Don Creek and Associates to continue design administration and review of plans vitb specifications for the following projects& 19th Street Nest City Limits for $18,000 (Account No. 22- 4637. 3743), Sernosa /Csrtilla for $16,000 (Account No. 22- 4637 - 8744), $17,000 for Zircon /Amotbyst (Account No. 22 -4637- 8746), $2,000 for Banyan Street Extension (Account No. 22- 4637 - 8739), and $8,000 for Arrow Bridge Widening (Account No. 22- 4637 - 8738). She total amount of this Change Order is $68,000 to bring the contract total to $113,000 to be paid from the Systems Development Funds. 14. Approval to execute Reimbursement and Service Agreesents 48 (CO 98 -170) for the Proposed Assessment District 89 -1 (Lewis Names) to be funded from Account No. 70- 276-483. 15. Approval to execute Professional Services Agreement (00 65 85 -171) with J.P. Davidson for the Master Plan Beautification Study for Seven Avenue and Base Line Road, to be funded by Beautification Funds in the amount of $42,000 as follwss $16,000 from Account No. 21- 4647 -8047 (Base Line Road), and $26,000 from Account No. 21 -4667 -8724 ( Seven Avenue. 16 Approval to execute contract (00 85 -172) for the City 66 Corporation Yard Phase I, Base Bid "A" including Alternate 4 deduction project, located at 9153 Ninth Street, awarded to Lucky Construction Company for the amount of $2,200,000 ($2,098,000 plus 5Z contingency) to be funded from Capital Reserve, Account No. 25 -4285- 7043 i, 01M city rAUncil A October 19, 1988 PAGE .„ 4 + de Yy A 17. Approval to execute contract (OD 88 -173) for the Ninth 67 { Street Rehabilitation Improvement Project between Vineyard Avenue and Baker Avewe awarded to Gentry e% Brothers, Inc._ for the amount of $120,330 ($109,388.65 plus 101 contingency) to be funded from Gas Tax Fund Account No. 09 -4637- 8815. ' 18. Approval of an Agreement (GO 88 -174) with the County of 68 {' San Bernardino for need abatement services. 19. Approval to execute contract (CO 88 -175) for the design 76 + of the Red Hill Park Lake and Amphitheater Drainage Improvements to Linville ZivLl Engineer /Land Surveyors, ' Ioc. for the amount of $16,200 ($14,800 plus , 103 contingency) to be funded from Capital Reserve fund Account No. 25 -4265 -7043. ' 20. Approval to execute an Agreement for Postponement of 77 Recordation of Declaration of Restrictions (CO 88 -176) for Tract 13271, located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Levis Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 86-612 78 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AGES MEET FOR POSTPONEMENT' OF RECORDATION OF DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT 13271 21. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement and 80 Improvement Security, and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Parcel Map No. 113410 located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Levis Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. 88-613 81 A RESOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11341, (TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP NUMBER 11341), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY 'S 1. FF- ji�r r(' i� F E, PAGE r City Council Agenda October 19, 1988 5 RESOLUTION NO. 88-614 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOLYIA, ORDERIHO THE ANNEXATION OF Cg RTAIH TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE HAINTENANCE DISTRICT N0. 4 AND STREHT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL MAP 11314 82 i 22. Approval of Hayst execution of improvement Agreements 88 (t} and Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting ;t1 Maintetaaee District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tracts 13748, tLt. 13857 and 13858, imated at the southeast corner of t* Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by M. J. Brock and Sons. RESOLUTION 110. 88-615 87 ti A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CUIDICII. OF TSB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFCRNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ACREEIIENTS. IIUROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL NAPS OF TRACT NOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858 RESOLUTION N0. 88-616 88 A RESOLUTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL 07 THE CITY CP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE /LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT MOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858 23. Approval of Nap, execution of Inproremant Agreement, 9i Improvement Securitys and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. I sad 2 for Tract 13728, located on the northeast cornnr of Sapphire Street and Hillside Road, submitted by Hillside /Sapphire Venture. RESOLUTION NO. 88-617 92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCI.MONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL NAP OP TRACT N0. 13728 ly a 1110-4-1-101 , P City Council Agenda October 19� 1988 I 6 6 4 s♦ RESOLUTION NO. 88-618 '93 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCILL, Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORhLk, ORDERING THE ANFEI:ATION 07 CERTAIN TERRITORT TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT ENO. 1 AdD SIREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MOO. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13728 24. Approval of Map, execution of Improvement Agreement and 99 Imprc7ement Security, and Ordering the Anucaation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Boo. 1 and 4 for Parcel Map 9897, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by Levis Development Company. RESOLUTION NO. e8-619 98 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTEN CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9897, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 110. 9897), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY RESOLUTION NO. 88-620 99 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OF 1'HB CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPI MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCRL MAP 9897 25. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 102 Tract 13353, located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue, submitted by ALH Limited Partners. RESOLUTION NO. 88-621 103 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13353 4 s♦ ', October 19, 1988 AI „ City Council Agenda PACE 7 26. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 104 Tract 13542 -1, located on the south side of Nilson Avenue at Caniatel Avenue, submitted by Grigsby Development. RE80LUTIOM NO. 88-622 105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGE KENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13542- 1 27. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 106 Tract 13542 -2 Stem Drain, located on the south side of Nilson Avenue at Canistal Avenue, submitted by Grigsby Development. RESOLUTION NO. 88-623 107 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COCNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT ACFEENENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY YOH TRACT 13542- 2 STORM DRAIN 28. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 108 Tract 10414, located on Ridgeviev Avenue north of Hillside Road, submitted by Greg Lundeen. RESOLUTION NO. 88-624 109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEIE.TT SECURITY FOR TRACT 10414 29. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for 110 Tract 13057, located on the south side of Uighlcud Avenue betveeo Fairmont Avenue and Deer Creek, submitted by Fieldstone Company. RESOLUTION NO. 88-625 111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGRSMOSHT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13057 S FI i♦ "s �•I PAGE °i�, -',F ' dry; City Council Agenda AX /010/V October 19, „988 8 .° r r t Yc ryY W 1 Y, a' i; 30. Approval to axe: uta Improvement Agreement Extension for 112 Tracts 13022 8eatq 13022 West, 13022 Major Streets, located on thu vent Bide of Milliken Avagra between lairmont Avenue and Victoria Perk Lane, submitted by Willi" Lyon Company. R890LVI70H N0. 88-626 113 A RESOLUTION of THE cm COUNCIL or THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPPDVBNBHS dC8861f8HT B7.T8HSIOtl AND IltPHOVBNBNI SECURITY ➢OH T8dCI9 13022 HAS3'a 13022 Y83Ti 13022 MAJOR SY8BBT9 31. Approval to execute Improvama¢t Agreement and 114 Improvame¢t Sonority for Parcel Nap 9350 located on the gvrtboaet corner of Haaa Lice Road and Milliken Aveauer submitted by The William Lyon Company. HB90LDTION N0. 88-627 115 A @HSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 3H8 CITY Of RANCHO COCAHONCA, CALIFORNIA, dPP80➢IHC THE INPHOYBJSNT dC88LNE8T AND I:4HOVHNBNI SECURITY FOR PARCEL NAP 9350 32. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement and 116 Improvemngc Security for Tract 102101 located on the north aide of Almond Avenue, east of Sapphire Street, submitted by Nordic Development Company, a General Partner of Skyline I, Limited and Release of Improvamnnt Agreement and Improvement Security accepted by City Council on September 4, 19859 submitted by ➢orcast Mortgage Company. 88SOLUTION tl0. 88-628 117 A 88SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL or THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCd, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INP80VSNHNT dCHH8N8NT, AHD I!4'gOVHMHNI SECURITY FOR TRACT 10210 AND RELEASING THE INPBDV6N8HT ACBH8N8NI AND SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACC8kT3D 33. Acrroval to release Faithful Performance Bond and accept 119 •educed bond to replace original for Tract 12642, 12935- ' 44 major otreets, located on the ¢eat aide of Milliken Avenue north of Highland Avenues submitted by Kaufman and Broad. t s City Council Agenda October 19, 1988 34. Approval of Ispzrvements, - eleaae of bonds and file a notice of completion fort Tract 12621, located on the south side of Arrow Highvnv: between madronn Avenue and Batter Avemie Releaeet Faithful Performance Bond (Strout) 9169,000 ACCeptt maintenance Guarantee Bond ( Straet) $ 16,900 Rgsolm,j0N N0. 88-629 A RESOLUTION Or INS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTL90 TBd PUBLIC IMPROVZMEHTB FOR TRACT 12621 AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OF A NOTICE OF tONPIXTION FOR TIM WORK Dg 81 -01, bested on the nortbeaat corner of Arrow BtRhwar sad Maple Plece FaitLful Performance Bond (Street) 9 22,000 RESOLUTION NO. 88430 A RESOLUTION OF TO CITY COUNCIL OF I" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING 1'88 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 87 -01 ANT) AUTHORIZING THE FIITHG OF A NOTIm OF COMPLETION FOR TER WORK 7740 Haet Avenue Faithful Performance Bond (Streit) $ 9,500 RESOLUTION NO. 88-631 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORN A, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 7740 EAST AVENIUS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COICLET104 FOR THE WORK PAGE 9 120 121 122 123 124 125 r`"' PAGE„ 'r� AA p City Council Agenda October 19, 1988 10 r!,: 35. Approval to accept inprovanents, release Heintenance Guarantee Bond fort Tract 12922, located on the north side of Highland - 126 Avenue. cut of Haven Avenue Haintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 10,000 Tract 11625, heated on Una northwest comer of 19th 127 Street and Deraau Aveaue Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 42,530 Tract 9619, located on the northwest corner of r raaliea :28 Street and Jasoer Street Maintenance Cuarantaa Don-1 (Street) $ 81,350 :6. Approval to establish the 5uperviaory /Profee atonal 129 classification of Administrative Aida at the salary range of $1,888 - 82,423 per mouth (Step 340 - 390). 37. Approval to upgrade Sheriff's Sergeant to 130 Lieutenant /Traffic. 38. Approval to upgrade station clerk position to clerk for 132 records supervisor. 39. Approval to expend funds for citizen patrol vehicle for Sheriff's Department in thu amount of $6,000. 133 40. Approve. of Proposed Intention to Construct the Jersey 134 Boulevard Storm Drain betveen Utica Street and Red Oak Avenue vithin Assessment District 52 -1 and the calling for bids for said storm drain construction. RESOLUTION NO. E8 -637 136 A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA, CALIFOR9IA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERTAIN CHANCES AND MODIFICATIONS IN THE YORK IH A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AND SETTMG PUBLIC HEARING City Council Agenda Do tot, 19, 1988 11 - RESOLUTION NO. 88-633 A RESOLUTION OF TEE fZTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RA11CHO CUCA..XONGA, CALIFORNIA, REFERENCING PREVAILING' MACE SCALE AND DIRECTING CALL FOR CONST911CTION SIDS 41. Set public hearing for Novas er 16, 1988 - AN AIKAL OF TER COSDITIONS OV'APPROVAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13138 - 138 140 RCDINe COMPANY - An appeal of five S eo¢ditio¢s of approval pertaininU to utility undorgreunding, street dedications and improvements, emergency =case and storm drain facilities required by the Planning Cossissiw for a residential subdivision of 18 jingle fully lots on 52.88 acres of land in the Ver; Low Residential District of Sapphire Street, south of Almond Street (APH 1061- 091-03). D. CtXSX Tf ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have bad public bearings at the tine of first reading. Decond readings are expected to be routine and non- controvelvial. They will be aetai upon, by thA Council at one time rlthout discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be reamed for discussion. 1. No items submitted. E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following item have boon advertised and /or posted u public hearings as required by law. The chair will open the meeting to receive public teatimoay. 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESAME11T AND BICH OROINANCE AMEND)MUr 141 88 -01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONCA - Various =rdments to tia Sign Ordinanco regarding neon signs and window signs. Continued frog September 21, 19886 Request that item Le continued to November 2p 1988. i+ PAGE N,~ vV• City Ccuocil Agenda L October 19, 1988 12 ORDINANCE N0. 358 (Pint reading) 142 ; AN CkDINANCB or THE CITY COUNCIL OF YHE y r`. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,, CALIFORNIA f APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88.01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO COCAN3NGA r µ MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR NEON AND WINDOW SIGNS AND ADDING PROVISION FOR TEMPOFARY SIGHS FOR CITY LPOHsom mc.tAL EVENTS s 2. CMRAL PLAN AHLYDMEWT 88 -039 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A 149 �� request to anend two sites of the Last Use Wp of the General Plan, located on the mouth side of Highland Road at Milliken Avenue on 9.3 acres to the west. of ;Mliken 1 , and 12.9 acre& to the east of Millilen. The r,yuest T proposes the switching of Medium Residential to u Neighborhood Comereial between the tro rites - APE 227- ' 011 -22 and 202 - 211 -48. WITHDRAW RY APPELLANT 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMSNr AND VICTORIA COMKUWLTY PLAN 149 AMENDNENr 88 -02 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - A request to w mend two sites of the Victoria Comunity Plan Land Use il Map, located on the south side of Highland Road at Milliken Avenue on 9.3 acres to the vast of Milliken and 12.9 sera* to the east of Milliken. The request proposes redecing the Medinm -High Residential designation (14 -24 dwelling units per sere) to a Nedium Residential designation (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and switching the designation of the two sites to m Neighborhood Coercial on the southeast corner and Madras Residential on rle scuthirost corner - APN 227- 011-22 and 202 - 211 -48. tr=RAW11 BY APPELLATE 4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CEjMRAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88- 150 UNITBi -V A request to amad the General Plan Laud use Nap from ory Lou Density Pasidential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) to General Comnreia7 for 57.5+ acres of land located south of 24th Struet between Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Preewny. The Cic.• Council will considur Other appropriate General Plan land use categories (Neighborhood Commercial, and Office) - APH 226 - 121 -089 11, 12 and 226 - 112 -03. •r City Council Agenda . 5�.•3 , October 19, 1988 ... PAGE ;^; =� 13 RESOLTION NO. 88-634 172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCM OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG., CALIFORNIA, REOOMHENDINO APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AiMNUXW 88 -03C, TO AMEND T3E GENERAL PLAN LAND USE NAP IWA VFRY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO CZHERAL COMMERCIAL FOR 57.5* ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF 24TH STREET BETWEEN CHERRY AVENUE AND THE I -15 FREEWAY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND MARE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH 226- 121-08, 11, AND 12 5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN 150 AMENDMENT NO. 88 -05 - UNITGZ - A requsss to amend the ( Etivande Specific Plan Map from "VL" (Very Low density residential, 1 -2 dwelling units per acre) to "CC" (General Comsercial) for 57.5E acres of land located south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway; and Erna "PC" (Freeway Comarcial) to "CC" (General Commercial) for 6.5 acres of land at the westerly conjunction of Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway. The City Council will consider other appropriate Etivands Specific Plan land use categories (Neighborhood Commercial, Convenience Commercial, Freevay- Related Commercial, Office /Professional) - APN 226- 121 -08, 11, 12, and 226- 112 -03. ORDINANCE N0. 376 (first zeading) 174 AN ORDINANCE OF THE C'fY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ETTVANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -05, AMENDING THE ETIWAHDA SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE MAP FROM "VL" (VERY LOW) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO "CC" (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) FOR 57.5• ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 24TH STREET BETWEEN CHERRY AVENUE AND INS I -15 FREEWAY{ AND FROM "PC" (FREEWAY COMLRCIAL) TO "GC" (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) i I FOR 6.5 ACRES Of LAND AT TIM WESTERLY COHJUNNTION OF CHEkpY AVENUE AND TIM I -15 FREEWAY, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOENIA- APN 226- 121 -08, 11, 12, ANJ 726 -112 -03 a es 4J: k`. City Council Agenda PAOF..k 'ri+ i; y�%. a October 19, 1988 14 �' 33r•. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES6mn AND GENERA. PLAN ANENDMBNT 88- -176 l,r6. 038 - QUINTESSENCE D VELOPMBNT - RELATED FILE1 < V1 TENLITIVE-TRACY 13359 - A zoquest to aamnd the Land Use Map of the General Plan from Park to Very Low for Residential (less than 2 dvelliog usits per acre) east aide of Sapphire Street, 3.85 acrd located on the - AIN 1061 - 691 South of Hillside Road i r� RESOLUTION N0. 88-635 191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CWHGLORHIA OF TEE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAr r � APPHOVIEO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03B TO CRANCG THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM PARE TO VERY LOX RESIDENTIAL (2 DN6Ll.ING UNITS PER ACRE) ON 3.85 ACRES ON TEN EAST BIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET, BOOTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAHONCA, CALIF02NIA AND HALING FINDINGS l4 SUPPORT THEREOF 7. CONNON-TY '9' ELOPMBNr BLOCK GRANT HOUSING ASSISTANCE housing 193 PLAN FOR 1989 -1991 - Identify Lng need for Raaeho Cucamonga as required assistance in Lou City of S. Department of Rousing and Urban by the U. Developmaat. i RESOLUTION MO. 88-636 212 A RgSOLUTIOM Of THE CITY GOUMCII. OP TIM II CITY OF RANCHO CDCAMONCA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR TH9, 1989 -1991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM S. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Be- 11- 213 MATLOCK AND Aga - An appeal of conditions of approval foc a 6,385 square foot two -story office land on the southwest coiner of building on .40 &urea of ^incyard Avemla and 8an Bernardino Road in a Co®unity Co.�&rcial District within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan - APN 207 -102 -09 k r • .w.�,sk: .. agdl... - ��.a��,'.iw:- >c >(•it'�i:•. =t! YYiw FY PAGE City Council Agenda 0 tabor 19, 1988 IS r O 4 v ' �, Y. YDaLIC HSARING;i The following item have nn legal pablication or posting 4 requirements. The Chair will open the meeting to receive i public testimony. ;L• ,y31 1. No items submitted. x.' G. CITY ll1 LOWS STAFF RHPORIS The following iter:a do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. e 1. CITY -WIDE SMOKING ORDINANCE - Recommendation from the Advisory Commission to eons der an Ordinance permitting smoking in certain facilities and areas in the City. Continued from August 17, 1988- Request that item be coatinuej to November 16, 1988. y 2. A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE HELLMAM AVENGE ROCALYPTUS [:l ' WINDROW AS A POIti'I OH DISTOBIC INTEREST -The eiat" It Preservation Commission had recommended point of +! interest designation for the eucalyptus trees on the vest side of Hellman Avenue between Base Line and Is Ronda. RESOLUTION NO. 88-637 287 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE HELLMAN AVENGE WINDROW LOCATED NORTH OF BASE LINE, SOUTH OF LA ROHM, AS A POINT OH HISTORIC INTEREST ], STATUS 2RT ON T8E TBOMAS ROUSE, 7980 VINEYARD AVENUE 288 The Historic Preaarvation Comic sion reconsidered its recommendations to designate the Thomas House as a landmark and voted not to recommend designation. 4. NORTHEAST PTIWANDA COMMUNITY PAP.R PROJECT YINANCB7G- 315 Consideration to designate the City proceed with the sale of Certificate of Participation to reimburse the general fund or other available moneys for the acquisition of land relating to the Northeast Community Park Project. g j PAGE City Council Agenda October 19, 1988 16 01,11-all .r M. RESOLUTION NO. 88-638 319 A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING THAT PAYMENTS MADE BY THE CITY IN CCNRECTION SRTH THE ACQUISITION OF LAND RELATING TO THE NORTHEAST ETIWANDA COMMUNITY PARR PROJECT ARE TO BE MADE IN ANTICIPATION OF REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A PLANNED LEASE FINANCING WITH CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CERTAIU ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO 5. COMPLAINT RECEIVED BY RESIDENTS RECARDING :NSTALLATION OT FENCE FOR BRIDLE TRAIL ON SAPPHIRE. 6. APPOINTMENTS FOR TASK FORCE TO REVIEW PAR[ AND 320 RECREATION FACILITIRS — Appointment of one councilmember and designation of Mayor to servo on task force to review park and recreation facilities. B. COUNCIL BV3M3S The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Cb.lr may open the meeting for public input. 1. CONSIDERATION TO SUPPORT rROposITION 85. (Buquet) 323 I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXTMRS`TIEG This is the time for City Conceit to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next toasting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State In prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsaqueat meetiag. Castanets ale to be limited to five minutes per individual. 01,11-all .r M. PAGE City Council Agenda October 19, 1988 17 Sig K. AWOURKHM I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of gaucho Cucamonga# hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda we posted on October 14, 1988, seventy -tw (72) hours prior to the s sting per A.B. 2674 at 9720 -C Base Line goad. Sig 1 s: �4. :r 1� e N FNF +opo npNnaar rarNdnonrnnn�+Na irN °E nFr Nwo nnrvr n N u a i I i r 6 ZI < 1 • Z it Nal NaFOPOrNnYN4FOPOwrvn INaFOPOrNnaNdFOPO 6_ .rviF�rvNNNNNnnnnnnnnnnf Y!!!frlIYNMNNNNOanNa < 1 P NNM1NNNrvNNNNNNM1NNNNNrvNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN t) I NM1ryrvNrvNNM1NNM1NNNNNM1NNrvNNNM1NNNNNNyM1�NM1M1NryNNN "JO' 1 Pn�i.��FL2ti Z x�S r L �LJ ZPSL �Y f 6PPVF�^°. L ^SF W F WM W`WU n6 W <:n60w ^< O ..✓ .n p. W.^+M< r wM NW i QoNYN.QUO� ° x °n °2W r QiiQ...Q..o NQi- WQr.°.iz 2 1 ) W SrG P� +^ N FJ F GrZNS2FOVU O .. 1 O� 1"O •FPr J NNWQ V oYW i o +o i o ooF2lior wo rai Q< i tia i uiF � o ruQOU ` u�uu`QMUUUUUUryo �r i.�.. QJ° t J °..s Q �riiJpJ Jy¢W U°QQOM iI O I OU U O A Yi N� �w0<WN <Ot OiFo ° I O 002 J.w ¢jF 'J6nWYOn 6 °Q °.N...°n isx °�rq .zl °�'�i'[W wiYw QI NP26JZ OW_p <ZO < J O� OF Qr V � � � \N W6 W w 2 WMi� �t 1�ZJWf <NNVLL.t P �r ZJwZ YI"O IN •'Q «Q N :Wr �WNeLL a �.e QJJerm °� �°. °ooxo Q uLf z ° NFU Vjos >Y WuYLLZOJe Li M '� NW�.W rNO iaWW YueNWOOOlY .n xNWy¢ r ., .N+ozir osa ¢ °a�ooiiJ��r�zJ°d z�Yn� »u.a G� N N zNJU O° $W+.N ~ae <�J. S +NrWNLL¢WWw oY L �( Yrt000 %nSw\ <pOVWnpw 7tW <ZrW J^ U y UVJL6Y... OP.+L NQF <NLL +V VC OV.[Z W <64'iO r�N R 3 2 : w i u z a y N� 191 uNII1 N rYUY K O r Q 62 N2 Zu°i� 29 J u� W " eiWUS °j�N ¢NO- t O N NW ZW NH <SN< W 7w N^ S VN 6 N Z<JrN O Wiu mWW .tN UY ^° Z 2°O Y O.tFF Z S Y_U �,xr L < JL< OOS��[[6 °O YVFLL ^W «tOWI" UWJQO ZOLNV N<uMV N I � ZiQQW W VrJrJ= SS °J�Y.ZiWYZWYSJ 3�.0 �< OFZ SOrW2¢ ° <r6J J I .� ti SN <L.ViV6 OCNJWr! �^FNNrULL <O Yy� 6M O J St Q< UUOE JQN.J .Wp7W Z'JO ° q s < <JSQaQ �i t «i « < « «« <mmooWmNNNm�sm ° 61 F N q Nq0 +0 N + ^FY ^FPnnPdnaPNOrFnTVII rOq O r OOnraPP aFrNwNF..N YaNOnral�Y YF w I r w w.di .°.. Oin�.ai .aiN.l aw F.NiP PN O iw.aiw wwwO.Yidiw I r J r Z ■'.. N u N h u •c 6 <_ Y z • O a M1 pV S V a a Vi N"" gpNOOONOOOepao °°e°n..grop°p�OM1�eoerv000 OM1OFOONh0000000°OOONM1..q O00F000p OOONOOV OONNM1nNnOON FNNO ppppNN ^yO�pOgNPOPNw� ^nwNON ry�IOr�ngNyr�wwgOpPOM1Nn I_ Pq._arNryO NI..P II NN M M1 wO P M1n w +NgINOhOPO +N qY O.pN pp Nryq.f N.phOpO +M1gYN pFOPOw «O ¢ <O C.p .p P.hFFFhFFhhS000000000PPPp ppp ppPTO fIN. NrhM1IM1. Fr�rrrr�FNNNNM1NM1NNNNM1M1NrvNNM1NNryN NM1NryNNryryryryryM1ryryNM1NNNNNNryWryNNNNNNNWMrvNNNNryry 60 M r Z _N_ y.F _U N 6S Y\ 2 uLi OW WW WN < ¢ W YYO �Y v�Oh uu �w r.hiWWM1 ..w I Fry h »F .7 WJr Y q a¢ ¢QY �[ ^¢iri 6 +aa0¢JOO VFQ ryn a osioQN ��iha°oaW °WWJW« Y°Y1saWZ F wi o j S o°N+ z2 SzNZ >�a°WWWZ °N WF°IW-- W- �. <hNN•� ^.- pJ. -..•.. unJJVhYd IN• N eh < n zr.W N i' . °Oi .wNOr000 °.+J a�JJUOQOi "'� o i JOheN uuuuYU ouiouuuuJJ >PJJ yJrvytyY' MJ u < +O Y. �tt O ^.. OON W'G ON °..aN Jn.OMV6 � V i'hyW >h <h 'JN� .qi .Niw .Y JQOT�.ILL'yYJ NN °Zw V.°iN W °N W O Vt06SN • ii>♦O OY `p OJOyJJtN Si�F..y �`n `liaaa.°...S.aNCNNN�os °W" Ni"iJ�.°Yr« a ;p o i N uQaW J ONN <WFtJQ 1 J <J �'\'YNZyhNN JI..UW U_ O Q N OY JJQtNULhrJ°S JN' i `JJhWaOt CI JW .`i «NVQV <VUV W Y�SwY _NV NNO N VYZ>. S> WVQI Oy000 r.Zj1yY60w tWWahZY Vi _NO Mir Oh�ehW2 32N�¢WO,1 .Li.26.V.�SY�40WY >22"ttQG6< LrLU2rOeh�O >OJJOW SO YUSOVS aJ O�i606Z °c oY iy.si.°.oL..oY.0 LLQO io oo�¢aa� °z <no��.a..ir YY.i ii o" 1aY> syN <�aQaasucYysMrai� ^�s +nNOLLeaaob �' <1. iYL t} c 1r y t<[ rY.[ r^ Y <N O Oh 6WVW O Y Wf>]QS �JLQGrp.N,l r.rN� OOQJY'W JtiQ `Zp,U VO2N¢� Y SWrV <h..Q NJJJ..i¢VOw < y W<¢pNW� °SWUi <Vy =Ur« WNO`Jr< Wy� W SN1\W O ft? ^�W wr VLZNW___ <tJtWOrV OtIYJ aN2 OwJ . Su22< YY< Y. Y_W O_w_t Yy� 2 tYi. Y¢'J S_O 6oO.L6wJ SVYUu11 h�NOw <LGWWWJJI YO ° p OOV� < }V I[W�er <NJO O °uLYZ.2 J�6 yJLL J ZWVUwtJ J<JJ1.Z°.JUa °< }ZY pLp��N2H Ja >VYh tWS°OWLL6 YVUUVVUNVVQYRNJOyUVyVVNVOi000WiWwM�LrLL Y'17 }1 ° <1 �nn..O hPNPnYONOFPNlp..q F.L MNNPNOnNnO°ry..np p.pp 61 NynNOPOn Cnnnglf.y Ol OnINOhOOnON ^hggNnNOq r it `Y • t g °neoion000a000nao °m+o. °onoPS °o oo�gro� ^• ?! .i nor ; gNNNONNOhO •• • dnnwFPd pl n µ n w N= Nn000mOdwndNNOnONNNwOOnn M1•Ohn M1 Owwn 1 1 NI nwIM1NnNNOwrNw N „ryNnwNtwNNnnwNNM1NnhO! w n Nn ry 6 <1 ti N Iq.OhOPOwNnlgdhmP Ol1enn nlNd�nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn tq� O 61 OOOOO�ngAAAwM1MhM1hrM1l"M1M1f M1hh1�I -w I�1�F•�MhhM1hl�I�h i � fl ryryNNnHNNNNNNNNNNnNNNnNNNNNNnNnnnnnNNNNNNN } � ; W� Ww N I• \V wU� WWI .1.•W16¢ Y 1 W W N •waw wN M1WSIUd6Wq `S 1 r u f 06U p ` N Plwd 6¢O¢V a V•¢.1� rvYW^ T ^• izs n ySn� 1 'y<•ZhNJM •Y«f • YLIp J O•hl•OJ <S6 .O .O ZJ OJO JfnVY• t_O 6ZlnOOlLO< ry•� YW V JMOMFYUWYV •Q�p M.h.••Vi•JVV6i JVU•.0 � �•nLaeJ�o¢ a �h < <a N io�o°i•�N�r°- W Ni O 6N�NOr iY N .6 yy11 �¢ Y�M1 m •Y L•y� W OOwWO `Y �nWO n±J OPNNJ6 ON WW ¢< !: P6V 00-> »Y ¢•^ YSao•. �'os�i ury <g »Mry¢ iN: i YamNaWal >. qi <J NO< 1 O •M1i•6 Z:P W: � }•Vw JI+•a0 C•Z�¢y 1 JwwO t0�� MI INOhNUNINOV. S •p0° OOWSL= J61Y6J��OJ1 V.6 SO•t WJ OY V Y Y6U•M °N al ° «`WJ a <JJJ o a.-W >aN roai UO�SYUWVOpf'2 � ^ym. ->L a.•g oM'aa `r.. <izma> Y � O <Y606•w6W 1 <W pt =r < =w?NOW�< � « <tJOi <Y Zj0 Vp Ji¢6 ��++ S¢S 1n• ZON�NO diJO¢aaW¢ LLuN > <2�� °$.. �ur��¢.1 �.a. °p M a.-°..��O�a <sM1W z &•2.•..a. wi sa�JW¢ppW W uJPmaaW�o��Qiao��+o >u ¢•W-on �.°.i�noaovmo¢Naa »» W � W V Z O y V Y Q 1 O • _ n 1 2 C O •[ � 1 F• t f[ < Y •= i � ¢ Q s Z J U JL 1 {YW W N W.-SW ^• ` VOONI"N U hU Y_ YYC�u�h «_u1 ¢' •• SWWN =N 6 1 YL � 52162! O Y�i •Y{L 1~JPJNw ¢ pWOtJlpt JWr loRW 7W SNO .O i•<+•W+F �LW<t>- J<a f i ^ <JJV YNGW ¢O �o- fCwpWiN_ O CwLW < LL O oa'�rW «VhYU °i �JU¢12 uVJ{h6W JOI"6 O_O_OZ <O •J'•vWmL6 duQ «mWLJSJ< « O ZJ CVSFtryUVO QQJN O• -WWS YL +U6VWQ0 « p< JOZ<6I`L •2 O`CU <W tSJ6K�NwJ��W Sww VYWWU� _ J YO uaoJ•W[SS I�Nf( ww •>Ln�>Si1��Yf¢[SyJI�•Oi•¢JOJJf VM1VVOVVVaZ Y WI N W� M1mdlNwmnwllwgMNP wN7dINnPhrymPln d'PhddNO nlVwhmN .NnPnwhww..h0lfwhNm •' d ° q^jmryryNl NM1PNdNndd »m d •. N N» y.Nidi w.a..N. w nd. .°..<..d. •' .d. .°..°..d• .o. i .. .N..°..d. u1- .d.'Cmd..•.d. .N. 3 1 a P •• roSOaO pr OOrrONOr0000PrySSryOryOnNgSODn�rypOi �O r �i r w�.° I. a^ na�0/ n1�f�wPwPggr '�•°J•.°. °n::��nngiSe lP..°..°�.°n •`nPdg nln•1 °e n'Jnl 1 rr Nr,< F arD nn s i r P, N o J e n o�Nn < 1 a s °�� • + +� +il°na nnrr °nnw°N Dp Oa aaa ra a.°o as Pa n °I.w ^reaFeP s ti w^ i�' �n�lnnnnnnnnnnnnwnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn�nnn�n °n n° VJ i� NnnnVw,n nnnryNnn niln nnh�nl`l •`ry ryil nl`'M1n nryl`lnnnnnnnnn gVg 1 Q r -3�° • Q N O ri WW� o Ji J Jt` ° s 1 1 W O •Li N R iwiO`n •`+ oD °1LU�rz V a°V nnNPnJ W W� F W W W Lisst3hi R ° WY °ww .• 6nH`YN ^Oe O ' F ryr\ IWfF P Y ONNN `2 ^ °• W nQ +W ►eiie�au W.°. °L %�u_si n °F�Q.W WW_.is..W F ° aSJPN ^ J e N O Nt0�1 Ofry Pn n °t¢D� NFO 0 00 0 ►t ut •^ •W .W ° � of o0"oo oo u �uuWU FWa �{uWU� Fu o g �uu uuueuu o sPQFCWSZ�aT�z�Fn a N'6� <W$ ► °i t'F NO��'oWU °eyzu° Xe of :W w W R az�rFrrW Don�:�O .�! -°•N.a -nn•¢ mo tYYSlIts�°P tt.zN ° Ntztp ° zuo.N- ��ONQMSWONWOnN1n� 90�S �NSN rS �W JOiy Oj°<<VI. N••Q tNO tNNN %eNR 2Wf6► jr <J Win <r< ufW ° yW OV °VN >QVUFrU L`Ya WOZyuy� OM1W2W � ^WOW02 <rOSLQO�r�`yuF�O pZp UWU� ^1 �CruWiV WStNt-WS YYII 1 [Vw•R p6 VII O ILUpW ¢.Lry 1V 002 ►66QYLQV°lVGO 1 ¢ _ < 6 6 W y w <l W p L a• < 6 6 2 W NU » u ►zD s y u i iWiY Nn'• .1. N.°, .1. of ° a u 9'i Wb8.°...1_ < Y�SNJ2�^ N• <4 rS�J r j* V26 2 •°1¢ ��JOW�?L WJ< s¢F° o F <Ni °.`.mW ^'•u J= oW < of <RW ^$Ni g bo�sQ _ ¢>LN uu11 UONWJr O T6<YL¢¢ OVUW {y�N¢� W¢NS^YWNO¢JOOwNQ¢ •°zWWJW gzWJ >z Iz. F8u °< F °iN�rF ° °1`n.<. >jWZSo � i izW <•°. �iwru <sri•oJON LWFI�►J<zW�F F «D3 � � °lursu �F <_Qaz •N• °J <°.uarFW ►viui° zDW ��. e �O`'�UOODSf OUi••<iO 000 w <¢L6 6 °O f46 1[v6UVY <ILN >N`SCOVVIM C� FV6Li¢ � O «y < 4 y; LOLVLF1010¢ r61t6 j66¢61C¢QOI 1 <TI FrNPN°dN NnM1NrPNwnedPYadOJPFreaaPNNJ rnOONd °1 OrNrM1FYrFNnr wr � 1 �eaFPry ^er ^'nN`y ^nr•°••°•wP <.Nin wwa.Nl �w lNanNid1 ^N r V _ f � V d i t i 1s 9 0 1 ■ r °D.°io ao.°noaon °o rawni.o� °o ocli Rio °o ° � i aon�r° vnshirr° ma °gfn8a;.�� °gg°NnT11A..°.�p;.8 a •1 ryNfN rP P OPf M1ON a _ 6 tl JI f O 1 1 Z •1 fPahOPOrNnf OahOpOwNnf OOFO Or�� O �1 OgOOOO PPPPPP^hPOO+00�40D� < jl NryNNNf NNNNNNNNNNNIhY NNff NNNryryry VNNry y N ° 1 Y L L OML�tLO MY N NW Y V 1 i °FtiFHp Oh <YF r12r 2 2 ^ �..rNf2Vrwwu MpZr OY°jOtrw V ¢ c °u a Os a.1.P- �acsaaQat .eir r,Q.1 gr�or °a u�.a. i i p � �zi.gi.uuxiszJ W:MFO =rwri of o 1 'Jq ° O r Y000er iOr �2< L O 1 �� J JWU WLWYYJVO Yt. •01 YNUNNUYnMJ 0% OfO=iQUV O JQi6UQY�WaJ W 1 uurD �c" <e.: �a z a �tiugW rYils °e �'YW i N�l[rzn > Z L\NN 6 °C AN� <�NhJV LJ rNYWWN� SN D 2 O< 1 VW }WJ�ip�Or J ryV°_r�W{ ^J� ttyy 61 yNl° <uwN N.QiNWW J °N Oy NMtlW NI N64 ZY _NMwf O JNWN6rVNVVj< OI N�O IMj� JJ ^J Yj fm0 �Q OWr gOWWJ }y SW6J � <t\J V O»N�YVr WS LV Z VhO7VSW ul ¢�WNrW<OOQ<Yi�q�W<gt\°s1 wO�p<OV�O rl .LU J�.}i.�Vw »Y��OOVOJLLmz.= 9x°00^ ° °W�„yy J ° <Wisi ^OO aONr6QVNPPnhrYOQt\h06�gVQJJ6 V u pp p 2 1 =� r =YVV VtI M 1 W Z 1 2 C V OOON,O� Y L W6Z tQ L LgOpOOV< V O V 3 O °LAC a Yf <f «RO ML V2 .l�L Z ^ ^ ^O N at1 ssN0 1 SQYW < Q6Q6Q�6 S Yt N6W Qq s 1 aN ooggqooWahu v a Qrr 06N�C� 06rjWWUrWWY2<Oi06YV< W.Zn< g00¢`N�Wiuii ^ ^ ^� ouuo u Q zzz 9'"iai'r"yz3yzuD `j y 3'"uh�N� u�q 0 1 �gWZOOSQ QQQWW <WN - WIZ2QQ�QLNr Sy }u 1 WW .. i gWWWWWWU W DDZ O<oiQiWW .N. mmio oN <NFZ�FSFJO n zaW z J _ FZ_<_O_t Qr Wh J ^NZNr6 S QW'J » >99W %N7WUy1 O `�N 3r0VrgS000pOU ^ <6t a6r t'J yy112W M VINJWrNNNNNNNOLO ^hOe�L6jS,t N �1 rrNrOarNrnhhhhOaOnq Nf Nf Pn N'f aP 1 hn^n_a r..0000..rrrrgN.paaa00pO i.^a0 w 1 N .awrw.ai�ynnAnnhyw��w +yff =hyP J 1 L 1 \ � 5 eo ogoapo «pooaPPOnoo°oaa0000eoo°hao°w°pry 1 OPO OPPnOOMh000nPOPO0U00POOpO000m0 °000.10a �a ^wftom— 8ryhMhVVOOnPnOYap +Ohnp n. Y�rh r hNOarw p f °an ^y'nr „ah0 Oy�PnI°VU i rr roi; Y z ei in��^ yprrynrrahrPernnrrahgPOr «nrwahesorrvnr n «nNnry«nnnnnnnnnnYrrr +Y +rrrrrara n s ¢� it + ri�rrr +Y+ + +Y rr+rrrY ++ +YrrYVrrrrrrrr+ V { hhhrhhhrhhhMhhhhhhhhMhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhrh U ZI NNNN «NnhN NryNNN «N «NNNNNNNNNNNNry «NNNNNNNNNry u ' N Q 66Qt°ip S ¢�O � Q06 ¢ W6n¢¢ i .S.• 2 FYW �rJO \Y¢N 6UYZ Y= Sr °rN c c coo z oily« WQWSJO go 00 f PF Y YUY�U <UUYOOIOONL�06h u¢i S"FfY�YY rOhQW iarw NipW {` ar6 a'tl � p iJM ¢ �QWr hM {\ 60 py W<pr P¢ NW O UU 6 \QY Oa O {�W Q 6 J ° yy f T.¢WLOJ 6 �¢SV 1 °�W Vp``r� <3.°i i[�lQNW�Wh6 yN� OS "V <f .°q_q wOp�00�ytl r.O Clr>jwiw° W1tY {� 61 r° � °wl PW errOwNhrYa .{r ��YV�dY < n N�^n,W WJas¢WeyW ¢r <srr opri> LuuWOSW ¢ n.En i.+u "1 9�^.inW {rte prWi ¢rN`�¢WCO � �oiEi.e uu <m< Nharjrmu <nFiu .°. J.<.iw.<- x>zv °.< -�Wa�J Or= O r rN uW�nLNZ r�WGJr >�u °.¢.SZ�N�FGGr.Uiti 2 >N<En6U0 6vu63 j TOp Or�mCJiU'V"a�O 000ffiJS�Wt °OHP�Ow %WVQ6 62 H- NYUVrNr >hnOCr h..u4W >Uhr ° > <• � S” Z�V 6 N UmN { i { WWI z r Ti�W .tl. uu> W YW Zy°.i a °WN :S rIii LN¢rGNIVm'E'W ¢ >¢{ y ^ {,1LCiN�'nK p°i 00 2 TWrQr QW4WJQ u1 V< O YYY O 1 J � 4rVr JW NJ2 <Y.W U.� pLL {O{ WSIL S�'U Y��Vtr<N� t N q :VC >OWJ.. °`:fi jW�y06J6NN w_WZNL YYr: MY13�3t<i N 1 �'Z < ^yIOYSUUUw"ly °6¢ °uOW� Q °0° °f I6Q ;000 <VV GJW..wtlWGWWNYy� Nm {` Ntlwr <JJ {ZihOi >uu O 1 < < {a { «Na <t <mgNeOpgOOmYYYNSUN IV YY°VSYU N }1 r <1 Ti+ r'+ hannNaPnn .n +na +�nNhOwOaPa +eraOwnNa QI NOPhNPrynnP +Pnhn NO°vIP PP «aahFnO q° r 1 °.hihi 'V a.... w.°iP r. w w.h1 °'_.aiw °�'wrwnlw nni raa° l � ■ 4 i- Y P s; ie n 6 t_ K i f O 6 yL 6 J V a t r m +na +OPaFaoneoowo°Nnaoone NnFnnooerono- p�npnpnrwpryoryreoPOOnnwoonoSr .�NFro naao�oao ..O NN•I p.fnePNwM1O1�pnON pf nnyy�� n dwnwnNnrOannp fP+FO of aP�N wr ..nrynOfP +FnO�NOrPnp� Nl.ninn+ .. ry F 't M fN nan No an..Nwn Nn Or n +ww O a r P ryr N nn nYViNpN V+aia.d °�Y'MFFFhF�nFFOppipppCCpPPPPPP FFFFhFFrFFFFrhFwFMFFFFFFFFFFFFhFwFFFFF NN\h1NNMhNNMNhNNNNNNryNNNNNNNryhNNNNNNNNNryhNNN Y pU lir.°i L! O r�w.Fnro NM >� nN oeoao�W oe�� oo z Y UJYNQ YYp JY � OYWV a of uW �NKry Yw �� 1. oFF..r"s 1 =6P W ` lNwWr OJY NJLI JL a � 5 +5S °d T 1 .0 Z� Hi �sWn ��isQ >F UZ, KwQO W12Y�zNN VGxP p jF. i Y O..WLSOO< OI to mCVNV KKWrN K.�.. QVWVl!Ny u; FQWr •OSxR� <.°i „r�Z6.wi�nV.°i0 N�NW�{{uNuII �y V nJ SV WUIiOJ�nF KV �QiMYJpG�n «LL P >6rr)C6 j�6�OrO�pNO�� >.Si6 ¢ V Q i r W H Z 2 N J . K �z a 00 yL• G n< 6K V.>.Vr 410 WWO V•OJ2U �VV oY2 SV Q .•tyVWK ) .ZiN OVLr O �< U � V...OiW r°.2 j1 ^�N6 w V ' i_OWN Nu � SJwO Q1 O WJNU V.. ¢.[S <nLN.SfN xFL 6� li� � Y\�o�as Sti Y+ GF »JrW.oa Yuo zdiW�'ioiW °w` ��°-. K�o uNr F LxLL <N K o mru o¢ s i �t�a¢ aN•. ° uaKi3 p2 •-zW3 .c S s11'o� °Sd`�'n�. WsoW tQ 2>iu ur.W �W o64 1 LSSVjOO�ZNwV J`Ui` YJ OQVW «JYSK_ONKVZKSOY I[VJ � 000 tWN tali „w WI'•f• <V22�2f.J �YO7WFW _L 6 S l�1(W <MWL 3. i i[ KK J 1 <K J=NWrrJ OVLY2��6 `RQ}`pS W.ViW> JS yO UONr¢� OF�O O WI U� 000 O WbWVYW.W �OV0V1U 00WliJ °S „S...Si .2..iilt�Z L.K/ �1 � Ki NFpnONF.Inwenf aVn6PnhnPnan wprnfN +nn a.pNFnN e OI OmpnnaF rryNPpryrywNnO Pf ry.pO OnONaPnnOOpmO OPn 1 ryn r'nnM ^rwMnry�Ji�yO= y/� /w /fy rrf OPw�wwnrni Fir nl `r! F ° P y � 7 N 1 i oaooeefgnP ^ryo °n.°.i •...... So °r rw °o °rn °o °oo °o NP n °o° FI OFOOYOP ry l w arn°i •N.pwO'^PONp nr P NFFOOYryOMpOyaOFOONOPFVd W a; fry <OrNf Oily NO wf natnPf.f NOa UYf CC NON 6 QI r <On II <IINn aNNY .. phw O rP s u i O b;pfYPOrNnf OaFYPOwN 11VNaFOPOrN Of NaFOPOrNryfba Pn ny°1 °.°lMOnR�Orwr „wwwwr..M1 NNNNry hNNNn^Innnnn �l<I nFFN�FFnFFFFfyFFwrFnrwwFM1wF� .N•y rrytinrAFr !1 NNNNryNNNNNryryryNryNNNNNNNNNryNNM1NNNNNNryNNNryryN V 1 1 � 2` � r¢F Q`f yi. ry0..¢ '• r y0w�w w ON Yf 6 1 QYO 6QUNW ° ' FwN J Jn2 i °rw ua ulo i uNU uWiWi.. :u °Y irlWt y�3 °$N i .N.1°onFU OU.�g�o Li z�yzuz y aoWa °o.2. ul a.+ti JZyoN�¢ NI <Sr<¢6•. SOy � oo�oN °YY N°iu <s WWZ �NV �ryOU°i� i�i ¢ <tL6P¢V¢N¢r M� w¢ ¢ Y ¢oWQ ini 2 �.-r r inwi nn$ d.. zoso N oi'r. `° ya< disc �u u o ury. °u uar 'IJn J�J Na3. Q�8 °m 3 ° ^° . .25. ..P .” ...� VO °00 N <WWJac IsmuI oyur JNJ .O.°.N r NiF2Z s V Z 6 • V y ` 20 •^ N i 30L > Yr V_ •Wi �' •Ni F V W y y N r ) �2 Fr pyXJ MN 4N N O ° z WS¢�<[S° <Oj.[•PiuJ 1 tt ^YU••{{U t •y�i NY9J aJJ VV Vtt <Q_y � Ot°YWV°JC..d20 yrJJYJ O Jy O�jp UV Z4¢V Q� »y2..66 °6VSNF¢S¢ L1Wy F2d F 20 WJJ „NN2W� L¢w<.jy <•Var >SyV1Nf¢ ONWF6YtpOH¢o Yu N V u2 >6plCON QY i�<V iJ2<Ohf >S¢YW�WyjIOU�aQ<WCWr O WI YJrOi J2yyZZtty -<jH t�tt�Z=�ZZON000¢°66JV6¢6y° 1 aaaWr J °¢¢ <1 OPFPYO rN of r.p ONONaNnFnFdryOPO ^OO N.f PFFhPON00 O 6 FVOOrrrrrnFFy�ryNNffNPFrrr dFNNgwNnOnd 1 n0fnw0�r.Fi r•Fi wwwF°..r'^.dwFO °Vww N.N•.O NFF�yFry.�h LK� i Y i < 4 < e S Y 6 yJ s u 3 Q L Q T < O � noleoNaFeaPregoe $ ea FnnNOareoeerearye000Ho 0 PNN OOOf IIO ^fp0 OO NnNnOONpOPONryNNNPNF O Pp.•ON rOPNPOONr nPrYn00 •OF hy�w OnOry! • aalOhrNOOP�NryNHYHi FOO^a OHNM1 ^.wN nNNnn4 M of rNrFn yPN w rNP N ••Or F.•n P r � r ar f ry r O N FO•P Y�NnYNaFOpOrrynlNa }OPOrNn lNaFOP U.YNnIN NN�Nf YYVYT INnNNNnnnNnJaaaaaaaaaFFFFFF ONnnnMnnnnNNNNNnNNnNI •NnNnNNNNnnnN FhFFFFFFFFhFhFFFFFhhwFFFhFFh F•.F FF NryNNNNryryNryNNNNNryNNNM1M1YNNM1NN ryNNNNryNNM1ry.Yry i j W� 2 YO.N�.LLLO W ^ L WOWWWWO •Fi b G j wwZ< •F.•9 H•riri rhi�n QZ N u¢iQ HO^ QYQQ¢Q ^o it .cN� xz oa zryxzz r-yN oN u. i�W ooW�o o ^`e coa.< u c uu�nn u uuu u.rYu < � Wait wiva a� �a g W NuwB asuhWi•°- I.Y^z• � a� „C5•'1N a <4W: yyL,11NF .r-oH yFiJ fFF2LN0! i1��O�VO WuNi3 �.0•iC-NQW .1'WN �•r o.4 ego°.• azJ��i.ei J°•.°•zus <xO V•.r ¢iUV••6 iL P•nilQyyU >�U OFNr•.•6 JQ O O�OWCQ <W 2N62JWJ<JtNVWY <O «xMgg o su'1'W U�2L".J.0 uazNxannno5 �: }YNNL26NOWN <Nf PNTLW <OPW.y�LW Qy0 <J<NhPa cJr�anayN L" -•x <bV VYNaFO yt7 Sy i V W J O N YL _t i O y li WO QF J Q ow u2 � 1 za i o aFnr NV „O SWJ 4W IfWL¢4 N2 610.•. OV ^N 00 ¢ O <OW Z Y�=f=6W ^W YW4yL_ V WWr•.• }�6 %ti . iWCLNOUO4tFyZ^ ox }PtlzQW. 'G <uJ <ePe `Wpp4 �xppx < •2•i��NW660XN6ZM V 4tib06u2•i O� < %rV 4 VVVU V i222 ¢ L V S •N.••N.• V . N N < y O O�WON • TUO C.6 t y V W O U W V O r r6 .¢61A T62J< 6 1••LI Yu2.O i 26 Vi >} OW J4 uO.4VNJUU2i0 r iJ Ln ��N2 .� e.NtltlN. `<.<21 :WMQ e,;LitlW�6�m¢ 'NO O + <J4 <VV j„ •V YVVOMn• N rJIL 1�NW iL 60WVJ Y JS aN•S.• ]'�rJVC4W O . O <S ii'¢ �1JW • <LL ONF hV •�4OTNMCN4�� C{ ��J fOSQJ �Lj ¢iVOF • 2= t O <hN V�� _ <ZO >ZOL ¢I]y �J OW � �tl``¢� O`LW¢JWO3ONNJ� FF� OX <NFUN N1Y XWN O•L �OU61 L66NW�N�62N��•Oi•NSNNW�YI'J ��JJO��XNY 1 NPO yOna�aOrrrhyOhFFhFOaYlf.O NNNnOrOM^ Or a�r� FNnOOhrydrrrrPNlnPFrN•"NO..pp SOY 1 rrP•Ni•I NP�Mn�Nn� ^ ^NnnnnydN ^n MNPANINlyN�N'/M I 1 �'� •J if _F oat',. Te: iFrom: By: Subject: ��'��.i:ti�: r_-• :.r@�rinr�,x� „- rio.16�; _= -'�:: :_,;,C,�rt.,..�,�E =, —' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT- . 0ctcber LQ, 1980 Clty Counnil and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Jarvis T. 3arris, Associaia Civil Engineer Authlrizdtion for the assignment of an Arl:lt Crossing Guard to Vie corner of Chu •h Street and Center Street fcr Dana Merced Elementary School. REC&DEIOATICY• It is recommended that an Adult Crossing Guard be assigned to the school crossing at the intersection of Church Street and Center Street, servipg Dona Merced Elementary School. O,1CK6ROlACl1AYALYSIS•, Traffic Engineering staff has cotTleted a review of the intersection of Church Street and Center Street at the request of•Mrs. Karen Spjut, 10167 Ashford Street. Mrs. Spjut's cl:ildreo attend Dona Merced Elementary School and have experienced difficulty in crossing Church Street at Center Street. The results of the review brought to our attention that 48 students cross Church Street in conflict with 344 veh:eles during the afternoon hour and 75 students cross against 385 cars in the morning. The Adult Crossing Guard guidelines in use in the City are met, thus plAcement of a Crossing Guard at this location is justified. Resp ^ i ugmitted, RHM:JTH:pam cc: Mr. Clyde Boyd, Chairman Public Safety Co®ission Attachment ?w � ADULT CROSSING GUARD NEED EVALUATION Location Cu „v,.y d C¢ti'rEo Distance from crosswalk to school_ 900' Distance .c nearest signal or st 'zP siEn_ Width of utreet at crosswalk_ AA' Date of Pedestrian counts Q.IS pp 1. School crossing at uncontrolled location. HN0. OF CHILDREN VEHICLE CROSSING(MINa20) VOLUME 75 3A5 344 CRITICAL VOLUME 160 2Lo Crossing guard Justified for 2 hours? �no_ 2. School crossing at traffic signal location. HOUR I NO. OF CHILDREN I TURNING MOVEMENTS CRITICAL CROSSING(MIN -40) THROUGH CROSSWALK VOLUME 300 300 `-- 300 Crossing guard Justified for 2 houh es,_, Y s7 ,no_ 3. S�mcu, crossing controlled by stop signs. HOUR NO. OF CHILDREN VEHICLE VOLUME CRITICAL CROSSING(MIN�40) ON 4 -LPNE STREET VOLUME S00 Crossing guard Justified for 2 hours? yes_,no_, CALC. BY DATE 3 Date: To: From: By: Subject: — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAfONGA STAFF REPORT October 19, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer James T. Harris, Associate Civil Engineer ;S M� Authorization for the assignment of an Adult Crossing Guard to the corner of Hermosa Avenue and Feron Boulevard for Cucamonga Elementary School. RE00101 OATIOM: It is recommended that an Adult Crossing Guard be assigned to the school crossing at the intersection of Hermosa Avenue and Feron Boulevard, serving Cucamonga Elementary School. lACC9R0UD /Al W.1'SIS, Traffic Engineering staff has completed a review of the Hermosa Avenue /Feron Boulevard intersection ..s requested by Dr. John F. Costello who is Superintendent of Cucamonga School District. The items reviewed included vehicle and pedestrian counts and observations of crossing patterns. The results of the review brought to our attention that 29 students cross at Feron Boulevard in conflict with 372 vehicles during the afternoon hour and 35 students cross against SID cars in the morning. Students must total more than 20 and vehicles more than 375 for the Adult Crossinq Guard guidelines in use in the City to be met. The vehicle volume for the afternoon was three short of the critical volume, howler, tta morning volumes are notably higher than required volumes. These facts and numbers were presented to the Public Safety Co mission at their meeting of October 4, 1988 and they unanimously approved staff's recommendation to assign an Adult Crossing Guard to the crosswalk. Resp ubmitted, �. — — t RHM:JTH:pam Attachment is ADULT CROSSING GUARD NEED EVALUATION '.Location I- iFRM�S4 � F'E_a'+ti Distance from crosswalk to school 2r)ne2 - �Distance to nearest signal or stop sign 35 — '£Width of street at crosswalk 29 372 Ze Date of pedestrian counts 9 i3 8B — 1. School crossing at uncontrolled location. i r 2. HOUR N0. OF CHILDREN CROSSING(MIN-c0) VEHICLE VOLUME CRITICAL VOLUME 7.Psa. 8:15em 35 510 375 2 3f� 29 372 375 300 Crossing guard Justified for 2 hours? yes_,no X_ �..�.,.,� .......e�.,., at traffic signal location. HOUR ti NO. OF CHILOaFN CROSSING(MIN -40) TURNING MOVEMENTS THROUGH CROSSWALK CRITICAL VOLUME 300 300 300 Crossing guard justified for 2 hours? yes_1no. 3. School crossing controlled by stop signs. HOUR NO. OF CHILDREN CROSSING(MIN =40) VEHICLE VOLUME ON 4 -LANE STREET CRITICAL VOLUME Soo 500 500 n Crossing guard justified for 2 hours? yes_ino_ CALL. BY � „ � 0• / DATE (Q�b / /-3 �; �k C S� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Dino Putrfno, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ANNEKATION 88-01 - PULSAR DEVELOPMENT - A request to annex a por on o e n ernar no county unincorporated area located north of Highland Avenue, south of the logical extension to Summit Avenue, east of the Day Creek utility corridor, and west of the County /City boundary - APX: 225- 761 -19, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 49, 53, 55 and 61. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council accept the oca ency Formation Cammission (LAFCO) Resolution No. 2166, appointing the City of Rancho Cucamonga as the conducting authority to the area described in the title of this report as Annexation 88- 01 through the adoption of the attached resolution. II. BACKGROUND: The entire site is located in the City of Rancho uc1 amonga's sphere of influence and is fully contiguous to the existing City boundaries on the south and east. Annexation of the site represents a logical extension of the current City limits as well as its services. The City, with assistance of its cooperating agencies, is authorized and capable of providing the full range of the necessary urban services for the site. Finally, the proposed annexation area is uninhabited, and the annexation is supported by 100 percent property owner consent. Annexation 88-01 Chronology February 10, 1988 Annexation 88-01 application submitted to the City April 27, 1988 Planning Commission recommending pre -zone to the City Council June 1, 1988 City Council adopts Resolution of Intent to Annex CITY COUNCIL °STAFF'REPORT ANNEXATION 88-01 --PULSAR October 19, 1988 - Page 2 Annexation 88-01 Chronology September 7, 1988 City Council adopts Resolution 88- 551 approving Tax Revenue Exchange bttween the County of San Bernardino and the City of Rancho Cucamonga September 12, 1988 The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino approved the exchange of property tax revenue. September 21, 1988 Local Agency Formation Commission adopts Resolution No, 2166 approving LAFCO 2503, appointing to the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducting at'thority, authorized to proceed. , The Coun'il's final action prior to LAFCO's Certificate of Completion is to order the annexation of the subject described territory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga through approval of the attached Resolution. RQe, lly s tted, BCer BB:OP:mlg :r e w� rr. r; ? e RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ANNEXATION 88 -01, ORDERING TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS THE AREA GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE LOGICAL EXTENSION TO SUMMIT AVENUE, EAST OF THE DEER CREEK UTILITY CORRIDOR, AND HEST OF THE COUNTY /CITY BOUNDARY, ANNEXED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. Recitals. (i) The Local Agency Formation Commission of San Bernardino County has reviewed the proposed annexation and on September 21, 1988, adopted Resolution No. 2166, approving the above - described annexation and authorizing the City to order the same. (ii) The territory described in the title of this Resolution is located within and consistent with the established Sphere of Influence of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and is contiguous to current City limits. (iii) The annexation of said territory represents a logical extension of the City's boundaries and urban services. fiv) The City Council has determined that the annexation of the property to the City would be beneficial to the public purposes of the City, in that the property will provide for development, within the District, in a manner consistent with the City's General Plan and with related development. (v) Regular County assessment roles are to be used for tax purposes. NO Subject property will be taxed for existing bonded indebtedness or existing contractual obligations with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (vii) The subject property will be regulated in accordance with the Low Residential Development Code standards, in addition to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Laws and Ordinances. (viii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B RESOLUTION. NOM, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1 This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part °A', of this Resolution are true and correct. _CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. ANNEXATION 88 -01' ` October 19, 1988 Page 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1988 m e 2. The conducting authority for this proceeding shall be the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. to 3. The boundaries are approved as set forth in Exhibit 'A' attached. AW 4. The following distinctive short form designation shall be used i; throughout this proceeding: LAFCO 2503. .+ S. is to proceed wi otut notice, hearing or herebypgranted Approval 6. Included in the City's resolution depicting final action shall be the detactaent of County Service Area 70 without split of assests or liabilities. ,tr 7. Upon effective date of the annexation the territory shall be withdrawn from County Service Area (CSAS 70. r; � 8. The date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion shall be 'y the effective date of this annexation. =' Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in this Resolution, this Council hereby resolved that pursuant to the Cortese/Knox Local Government Reorganization Act (Government Code Section 56000), the Territory described in u Exhibit 'A' annexed, and directs the City Clerk to transmit a certified copy ' of this resolution to the executive officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of San Bernardino County. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1988 m e r I , e -1- LEGAL DESCRIPTINON OF LAND TO BE ANNMCED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXHIBIT "All Beginning at the intersection of the Southerly line of the North 40 feet of the Southwest one quarter of Section 29, Township 1 North, Range 6 West, San Bernardino Base and Mardian, according to the official,plat thereof, with the Easterly line of said Southwest one quarter, thence Southerly along the Easterly line of said Southwest one quarter to the Southerly line of said'southweat one quarter; thence Westerly along said Southerly line to the Easterly line of the West half of the West half of the East half of said Southwest one quarter; thence Northerly along said last mentioned Easterly line to the Northerly line of the South half of the South half of said Southwest one quarter; thence Easterly along said Northerly line to the Westerly line of the East half of the East half of the said Southwest one quarter; thence Northerly along said Westerly line to the Southerly line of the Northeast one quarter of the Southwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter of the said Southwest one quarter of Section 29; thence Westerly along said Southerly line to the Easterly line of the West 330 feet of the East one half of the said Southwest one quarter of Section 29; thence Northerly along said last mentioned Easterly line to the first mentioned Southerly line; thence Easterly along said first mentioned Southerly line to the Point if Beginning jb r I Y� i i 1 v l a iu L east Lint or W"T e5o petrO• oP*�'+44 eFC.s� 0117TH Line Op He y4 orawl/44 aorlt a OF efYy4 yec. :Jw 1 /'r T. J N, WeST Unt 0 t'ilL oppt It or 4V4 1011TH Lute Or 941. or oft OF 4wY4 L1 -� wYt or HOlSTH L1Ht 0 511 y4 500. Z,!; `ORTH 4 Julau 91'E`a LS i SEC,.2J R, S W i "UT� Line or sNY4 om /9 U O �1 SUMMIT AVE. a 3 s 3 7vaLE� p.,lgp' m AVE. 0 1 L t LOCItSAGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO tee FlM sleet, bcmM tun . (See 0•a twnWlnq G aieleOlaO, pt•) mR4saa v C: •' PROPOSAL Rot LAM 2501 HzUUD1O WMI SMMWM ( 21, 1988 t j RCSOIATICM NO. 2166 A RRSOLO2I01 OF TsR WCAL A ANCf r0,MMCM CM=SSIOM OF not C001rPY OF SAY "B"HaRDIIID Mat2MO bedBRIMMUyi01 OM LaFCO 2501 and a av taec canon • e a Fu • (area generally locat t amen oL ca extern ens o S t Highland Avenues along the Clty4 northern boundary). On notlm of Ctalaiaoer Rragoess, duly «<aodeMd bb�y Connissimer Grant, am carried, the Local Agency ForRatiaO aim adopts the follwing rasolutims WHEULAS, " Application the of ben led vwith the fsncctive Officer ofry this Local Agency rcrmstim Commissim in accordux o with the Sei��0 j,sReorganization ficr eSi Code Section at. Beg, And Exacv Officer beesamned said determining and certifying his tbs .tr said cfilings aare wificient, and, wlIDtRA4, at the times and in the form and Sumer provided by law, said Sxegutiva Officer has given notice of hearing Public by this [emission upon said application, and, in- formation Prepardd Executive ort includheingrhisereecco ®andaliansnthereon. said filings and report and related fnfOrastlon having been presented to and considered by this Cnm issionl and, WHXICIe the public bearing by this Commission was held upon the date and At the time and piece specified in said notice of public hearing and in order or orders continuing such haaringl and, wIUKRRAS, At such bearing, this Commission heard and received all oral end written protests, the Commission considered all plans and propose6 changes of organisation and reorganization, cbjeCtiOns and evidence which were made, presented, or filed, it received evidence as to whether the territory is inhabited or uninhabited, Improved or unimproved, and all Persons prevent were given an opportunity to hear and be heard in respect to any matter relating to said application, in evidence presented at the hearing, Commls�on of the CCounty of San does ha detemiinnee,ion hereby resolve, order, and find as follows, D4fBR)Rl1ASICNS, SZMCH 1 The Executive copies Of this iresolution elu the bmmanneer provieeedcby to Section 56851 of the government Code. SRCTICM 2. The proposal is approved sUbiagt to the terms and conditions bereinafter speclfieds CORDISIOwS, condle e o two I-' The conducting authority for thin proceeding shall t City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1 t)i) r RRSOLVIION No. 1166 ZXh b "aa }fi t, ve The boundaries are apProd as set forth in signet on s 1T 2"AadThm do- throughout tOhlisssProocceledingt°CWCD 1501. notice, ear A°• 'a4 Approval is hereby granted to proceed without g or a ettion with 1006 landowner consent. Coot 1 �ro S Included in the City'♦ resolution depicting final act oa shaZS bi the detachment of County Service Area 70 without split of assets or liabilities. 1e2 �oj, 6 She date of issuance of the Certificate of CO'n'let on s 11 %e effective date of this annexation. SIMOt 3. She conducting authority, L norebv directed to initiate appropriate proceedings !a cORPllance with this resolutlon and State law (Govt. Code Section 57000 through 57051). SRCTION 6. The conducting authority shall not Make any changes in the boundaries hereby approved nor shall it impose any new conditions or modify any conditions hereby Samosa: unless and until it recelvos the approval of the Local Agency formation Commission for such changes, Section modifications, or conditions, pursuant to the Procedures prescribed in Section 568_7 of the OovernmsnC Code. afL=CM 5. Upon cocmlatlon of its pro..ed aings, the conducting authority if directed to adopt its own resolution Getting forth its action relating to the proposal considered and forward the required formation cCC®issicA"Rise (Govt.ofC de resolution ction 57075 Nrouugha57179). SSCrrCK S. Upon receAPt of the resolution of the conducting authority and filed. d said aetSoa, and !Sla the Certificate of Completion shall be prepared SZMOK 7. Approval by the local Agency formation Comoission indicates 4PPrcvsl of this proposal by the conducting authority would Accomplish maxlauapclants Of succeorganization s nimum disruption Of servvicettoathe [unctions of other local agencies in the area. SRCTICN B. PPMrNqS. The following findings ere noted In conformance with Commission policyl 1. The subject 51 5 acres is legally uninhabited. She County Assessor has determined the assessed value of land to be 2995,903. The site is within the sphere of influence of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. The proposal has not been advertised as permitted by law with 100% landowner consent. 3 The San Bernardino County General Plu designations and the City of Rancho Cueaeon0a General Plan designations are generally consistent, allowing apPrcxfmately 3.5 /DU per net acre. Both County zoning and City pre - zoning are consistent 6 The City Of Rancho Cucamonga has conducted the environmental assessment of thin proposal through Its pro- zoning process end has filed a llegative Declaration which indicates that approval of this annexation will have a non- signifScaat effa= on the environment. LAFCO certifies it has reviewed and conslderid the City's environmental assessment LAFCO Instructs its Clerk to file a NOtic8 of Determination within five days. 5. Local Agency currently serving the site are listed in the file. County Service Area 70 and its Improvement zone shall be detached upon 4nnla3tiOn of the territory. None of the other agenciaa will be affected by this proposal. 1 _°) / i XUTICN NO. 1166 fi. The Citl "B,Plan for -lsinicipol Sorviws Indicates that the City is able to prcvida,a -full. array of their municipal Bervlcas upon annsratlon= a� /or'dawlolaent. Water service will continua to be provided b• the, Cucamonga County water District. Fire protection services "0111 continue to be provldod by the LOothll) rise Protoctlom District.- y- r•- f 7. This innaration will- bemaflt,tha proposal al,'s yp making available mle)Pal evel "micas a 0111 benefit the City by allowing -the deunvslopaant nd to occur at City standards. a. This proposal iid'its anticipated effects do not conflict with adopted Comission-policies. 9. All notices requfrea or law haw been given. No Protest has been reealvod. 10. Maps and le7al dasoriptlona moat state standards.," 11. The City'and County have negotiated the transfer oL ad valorem texas as required by this Dropnsal. Copies of the resolutions the San BBernardino County Bond of SSuuppeirvisorss Rancho are on file in the LArCO office outlining the exchange of revenues. Tons ACTIdt A"WIm AND) ADOW= by the Local Agemey 1]rfatiom COssmesioe of tbe'Cewmt7 of man Bernardino by the following "tot AMISs CCOVA DCK=s Balker, wiling, Riordan, Nragness, eartolotti, Grant, Taylor MOY9t CONCE OVEMS Mons' ABSMMI CCORSSIOMBRir Now ABSnUt OONIMMo171st Mlkels (Volker voting in his atead) a a a s a a a a a a a s a a a a a S1'ATZ Or CALL A ) Condo W QR10 r Or S 2zmok183• I, JJ'J= M. 31000T, Lxecutive OfL1Cnr of the Local Agency rormation Comission of the Cuuntr Of Sam Ssrnardino, California, do hereby certify this record tc be a full, true, and correct copy of the action taken by said comalssioa by vote of the m mbsra present as the same appears in the official Minutes of Bald Ccmissioa at Its regular mooting Of September 11, 1933. DATtmt September 26, 19aa � �tivm Officer 3 �� VA-1 ' . • yi v ;r r S A 02503 Exhibit t ' LEGAL �; LEGAL DE,SCRIPTINON OF LANG TO BE ANNEXED TO,TRE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Beginning at the' intersection of the Southerly line`of �- the North 40 feet'.of.the Southwest one quarter of Section 29, Township 1 North, Range 6 West; San Bernardino Base and Verdian, according to the official Plat thereof, "with M '• the Easterly line of said Southwest one quarter, thence Southerly along the Easterly line of said Southwest one quarter to the Southerly line of said Southwest one quarter; thence Westerly along said Southerly line to the Easterly line of the West half of the West half of the East half Of said Southwest one quarter; thence Northerly along said last mentioned Easterly line to the Northerly line of the South half of the South half of said Southwest one quarter; thence Easterly along said Northerly line to the Westerly line of the East half of the East half of the said Southwest ono quarter; thence Northerly along paid Westerly line to the Southerly line of the Northeast one quarter of the Southwest one quarter of the Northeast one quarter of the said Southwest one quarter of Section 29; thence Westerly along said Southerly line to the Easterly line of the West 330 feet of the East one half of the said Southwest one quarter of Section 29; thence Northerly along said last mentioned Easterly line to the first mentioned Southerly line; thence Easterly along said first mentioned Southerly line to the Point of Beginning. .� .3 l' 3 s i. J VlbY _lfl'�11- y�� sullyeKt une {� r�yecst tall —, �Ityy�e�w � 1Nf{:5. Sins J/4 T. J No NK of 1 .1 E4ibit 11D 71 SLIKW T .E. ( ;S ' S�C.29 8 # Div, e d 3 fo�w r.kyr u *row ♦r `v) 'I -6•f0 T F RA CHO =GA m. NNEXATION PAP 0 lusift 1 {IM• CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA sY STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 WR T0: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell'N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Patrick Price, Equipment and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor SUBJECT: Approvsi to Purchase a John Deere Model S10C Backhoa/Loader trw Whitney Machinery, Inc. of Riverside, CA, in the amount of $64,525.38 to be funded by I.G.S. Account No. 72- 4225 -7045 REC0INVATION: It Johns Deere eMModeld 51100 tooeWh1Ueey Machineryrof0Riverside.a CA, as the lowest responsible bidder, for the amount of $64,525.38. Th' Purchase to be funded from I.G.S. Account No. 724225 -7045. Background /Analysis At 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday. October S. 1988, bids for the purchase of one (1) Rubber Tired Wheel Loader/Backhoe were opened in the City Purchasing Office. Bid; were submitted by Case Power 8 Equipment of Riverside, CA, Glenn B. Dor.,ing Inc. of Ontario, CA; Whitney Machinery of Riverside, CA; and Turners Inc. of Ontario, CA. Submittals by Glenn B. Doming Inc. and Turners Inc. had altered bid specifications as to available horsepower and criti*cal axle weight capacity. In that these bids are non- responsive with regard to their inability to provide the minimum requirements in accordance with the bid specifications, they should be rejected. The bid received free Whitney Machinery, Inc. is in compliance by meeting or exceeding the C11}yy specifications on these performance and safety I tems. After consulting with Finance, it is recommended that a two -year lease /purchase plan be implemented to acquire this equipment. Resp Why submitted R}M:PP• -Xi'tachment aw G , �' - { - °ia ; - -` .,�,✓ far �. _rr �r'� nZ L :-k October 5,'1988 ?, One (1) Rubber Tired Wheel Loader Backhoe >y' Glenn B. Dorning, Inc. $49,798.80 - .d744 E. Holt Blvd. ;Ontario, Ca. 91761 , 'Turners, Inc. $51,347.46 '5072 Mission Blvd. •. ,Ontario, Ca. 91762 Whitney Mfchinery, Inc. $64,525.38 P.O. Box 1069 Riverside, Ca 92502 Case Power 6 Equipment $68,000.00 929 West La Canena Drive Riverside, Cs 92501 ' rl.� u i4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT ANA DATE: October 19, 1988 A- M Mayor and Members of the City Coundl FROM Jerry S. FuMoo 1, Director of Resource Services Sl1d1ECT: Apemyal of rectaacllintlen of Resource Servine Departmnnre Senior nm o (Alul[V :9nt to AdminLtratWe AneWd ro M �mda.: from -A •nt Nr as •M Approval of reclassification of Resource Service Department's Senior Office Assistant to Admintatrattve Analyst to be funded from Account No. 33. 4130-1100. ANBL)=- The Rssourco Sorv!ce Departmenbra Senior Otfioe Asststanra lob desedption has grown Into an AdministratIve Analyst position. Her current responsibilities Includes: / Maintenance Contract Administration 2 Equipment, Malertats, and Suppfios Acquisition 3. Computer Maintenance and TMning Administration 4 Statistical Reports 5. Depdremants Budget AAWnfatration e. Projoct Tracking and Management Desktop Publishing Administration B. Data Entry Administration 9 Coordinating projects, tasks and assignments among respective divisions wihin the Resource Service Department. Over the next two months she will be assuming even more rosponsib!!lues. Sandy is a real asset 10 the City and to the Resource Service Department. Sufficient funding Is available In Account No. 33. 4130.1100 for this reclassification. Respectfully submitted, Worry ruh�vood'y /�WV+�C� Dlroctx of Resource Services JBF:sgr d DATE: October 10, Igoe T01 FROM: BI's SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jerry B pulwood, Director Of Resource Services James T Harris, Associate Civil Engineer RECOMIe[ViDATION, It is reccamonded that a contract for consultant services for the production of a city -vide Street Light Inventory be awarded to BSI Consultants, Inc , In the Amount of $11,780.00 ($13,136 00 plus 101 contingency) to be funded from Lighting District 81 - 55- 1130 -6028 $1,172 001 Lighting Dls slct 82 - 56 -1130 -6028 91,565 601 Lighting District 83 - 57 -1130 -6028 : ,310 101 Lighting District 81- 58 -1130 -6028 $1,788 80 and Lighting District 85 - 59- 1130 -6028 $313 20 BACAO MID /ANALYSIS The City Council, at !tea meeting on Jun. 15, 1988, ex.cuted a contract with 85I Consultants, Inc to provide a city -wide Traffic Control Device Inventory (1CDII, This Inventory, when completed, will provide the City with A list of the number, Condition and location of traffic control devices in the City. The Along to be included are signs, stripes, pavement legends and curb markings Along with the 1nvantory, a computer and software are to be provided such that these devices can be monitored, maintained and managed to keep costs and risks to a minimum and service :0 a maximum. Not Included with the TCDI wan an dazired A Inventory of street lights that is alto conduct A Street eLight yInventoryti BS Consultants, pro, Inc , su. witted a proposal to and condition of all street lightesend saLetyrllghtOBAI will pr videCthe location lights are those lights on wand or Concrete poles and safety lights yerasthose lights on traffic signal poles In addition to locatlCn and condltlo0, are type of pole, Size and type of each Illuminating source, non- ot,ndard head ter meet Arm directions, underground circuits and pcle numbers will be provided to defiae each street or safety light D-81 CITY CDUMCW- STAFF REPOM��e ;T BSI CONSULTANTS; INC October 19,,1988 Page Two L BSI will provide the InfcT=tJon,tc the City In- two farms. On City furnished I 06:II, scale property Ili* maps, BSI will -plot or otherwise Indicate each lightjccaticn° and will assign a unique Identif Ication number. This number, wLli'tL&.'tCgatber the cap plotting and the "second, feild,of inf aimtion. BSj? will 'notw.,the I spscif Ica_ of each light an field data sheets.-keyed to-each sup and uni(juo Identification Z number. These field' data sheets , 'will-be Input iito the PC' c6mputee'databasa, , developed as part of tha-,JCDI for later transfer to the•City-'s Prike mini computer system. BSI's fee estimate of $13,436.00 seems reasonable for the amount of work envisioned for a Street Light Inventory In Rancho Cucamonga. They adequately addressed all issues and requirements of the City showing excellent knowledge and grasp of the project as they did on their TCDI proposal., With the above In mind, hot'% Traffic LiginearLng and Resource Services staff recommend awarding the work to B_-1 Consultants, Inc., for the amount of $13.436 00 Plus 101 Contingencies for a total or $14,780.00 to be funded from the following: Lighting Dist 81 55-4130-6028 $ 4,172.00 Lighting Dist. 12 56-4130-6028 4,565 60 Lighting Dist 93 57-4130-6028 3,910 40 Lighting Dist. 14 58-4130-6020 1,788 so Lighting Dist 15 59-4130-6028 343.20 TI-4,780 Do Respectfully submitted, Jg , _XU� Vie-ry B pulwood Director of Resource Services JBP,JTH:Jpm CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t ''A ST_4.FF`REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance Manager SUBJECT: 1987/M ENCUNIRANCES RECD N MDATION: Council approve the encumbrances from FY 87 -88 and appropriate the funds to the account as outlined in the report. BACKGROUND: During Fiscal Year 1987 -88 (FY 87 -88), -projects were str ced and funds encumbered to pay for services. At cbe close of FY 87 -88, Invoices and some services were still outstanding, therefore, the encumbered funds need to be carried forward and appropriated to the account as detailed on the attached Encumbrance Detail Report. Respectfully submitted, t Elizabe h Stoddard Finance Manager ES:cm 1 k :i I 0 31 CARRYOVER PURCHASE ORDER - OLD P.0'S CARRYOVER BALAKE ' 6130/38 AS Of JUKE 30, 1%8 � ,Account Ru!ber OutstaWng P.O. Anonnt Y'w 01- 4110 -3900 272.48 01- 4124 -1901 783.81 01- 4124 -3900 677.46 � _ 01- 4124 -6028 174.00 01 -4125 -3900 1,343.28 01- 4125 -6028 355.47 01- 4125 -7044 3,000.00 i` r 01- 4126 -6028 01 2,074.97 -4151 -3900 798.29 01- 4151 -6028 5.025.00 :✓-' 01 -4152 -6028 806.76 ,.' 01- 4245 -3900 1,934.23 01- 4245 -6028 18,141.53 01- 4245 -7044 2,558.40 01 -4285 -6028 38,129.49 01- 4313 -3900 753.66 01 -4313 -6028 502.60 01- 4313 -7044 352.34 01- 4333 -3900 3,051.22 01- 4333 -6028 11,373.85 01- 4333 -7044 131.12 01- 4333 -7045 1,749.00 01- 4373 -3900 3,790.30 01- 4373 -3931 1,603.94 01- 4373 -6028 16,107.80 01- 4451 -3900 4,515.16 01- 4451 -3931 4,182.60 01- 4451 -6028 7,769.64 01- 4532 -3900 744.12 O1 -4532 -7044 4,795.03 01- 4637 -3900 1,835.75 01- 4637 -3931 4,444.65 01- 4637 -6028 3,350.39 01- 4638 -3900 3,686.20 01- 4638 -6028 121,298.54 01- 4640 -3900 180.00 01- 4641 -3900 635.58 01- 4641 -6028 50,856.00 01- 4641 -7044 147.00 01- 4647 -3900 17,630.68 01- 4647 -3931 30,900.76 01- 4647 -6027 500.00 01- 4647 -6028 65,418.32 01 -4647 -7043 181,614.19 01- 4647 -7044 34,783.4.4 01- 4647 -7045 35,987.00 31 3a PURCHASE ORDER CARRYOVFR BALANCE AS OF .BRIE 30, 1938 Outstandfna P.O. Apo 70,000,00 171,677.80 246.50 246.50 80,432.00 243.00 42,580.57 25,336.10 6,857.07 73.00 32,012.16 27,848.00 41,415.50 4,391.55 7,624.84 11,946.04 102,580.00 89,458.00 21,575.27 14,478.95 35,393.04 2,197.39 171,840.31 1,783.32 44,419.05 658,088.80 36.375.00 City Council Staff Report '.: October 19, 1988 Page 02 CARRYOVER OLD P.0'S ,,. 6/30,'58 Account Rater . +o - r Gas�T 2106 21075 'x - 3 ,x09 46 7 6028 09- 4637 -8701 + w 09- 4637 -8702 09- 4637 -8703 09- 4637 -8780 F l Gas Tax 2106 11- 4637 -6028 . +, 11- 4637 -8104 t- 11- 4637 -8113 11 -4637 -8617 SB 325 TDA Ford - 3 - 12- 4637 -8201 12- 4637 -8605 12- 4637 -8606 12- 4637 -8634 12- 4637 -8706 12- 4637 -8707 12- 4637 -8708 12- 4637 -8709 12- 4637 -8710 12- 4637 -8773 ReereA 3 Serrfces 3 -4 3- W SB 300 7574r37 -8050 Ped stsir G�rants /Article 3 1b 4637 -8717 FAU Sec. 203 i'7- 6537--8"T Fac.tivnnda Orafnabe /E 19-495 WR — 19- 4637 -8766 3a PURCHASE ORDER CARRYOVFR BALANCE AS OF .BRIE 30, 1938 Outstandfna P.O. Apo 70,000,00 171,677.80 246.50 246.50 80,432.00 243.00 42,580.57 25,336.10 6,857.07 73.00 32,012.16 27,848.00 41,415.50 4,391.55 7,624.84 11,946.04 102,580.00 89,458.00 21,575.27 14,478.95 35,393.04 2,197.39 171,840.31 1,783.32 44,419.05 658,088.80 36.375.00 city Council Staf October 19, 1988 Page t3 CARRYOVER OLD ►.0'S .- 6/30/88 Account Mber Beautification '11- 4641 -d046 21- 4647 -8047 21- 4647 -8135 21- 4647 -8138 21- 4647 -8624 21 -4647 -8718 21- 4647 -8719 21 -4647 -8720 21- 4647 -8723 21- 4647 -8724 S teas Development 2- i aa'1r -8m 22 -4637 -8607 224637 -8608 22- 4637 -8612 22- 4637 -8618 22- 4637 -8625 22- 4637 -8629 22 -4637 -8726 22- 4637 -8727 22- 4637 -8729 22- 4637 -8730 22 -4637 8731 22- 4637 -8732 22- 4637 -8733 22- 4637 -8734 22- 4637 -8735 22- 4637 -8736 23 PURCHASE ORDER CARFYOVER,BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30, 1986 Outstandlne P.O. Aawnt 224.00 11,209.25 16,489.75 224.00 224.00 •7783.12 10,266.12 224.00 224.00 1804.88 57.89 23,433.77 4,321.62 516,990.25 2,123.46 50,423.00 25,108.59 1,260.00 245.76 6,364.20 7 115 10 6 .00 .01 .30 .46 .00 :l o', 0 ,r ,r d� In P _, i City Council Staff Report s October 19, 1988 Page f4 °- CARKYWi3t OLD PATS PURCHASE ORDER CARRYOVER 8NANCE 6130188 AS OF ,BRIE 30„1988 ' Aceount Raaaber Outstanding P.O. Awmt S st�stM DeveloplEnt cent, -4b37 -8738— 22- 4637 -8739 810.00 6,770.75 22- 4637 -8740 1,386.59 22- 4637 -8741 1,000.00 22- 4637 -8742 107,146.80 22- 4637 -8743 18,997.88 22- 4637 -8744 13,750.00 22- 4637 -8745 127,927.33 22- 4637 -8746 12,666.50 22- 4637 -8747 151,8g04.5g02 22- 4637 -8748 22 -4637- 8760 166.g10:g2 7 76 00 22- 4637 -8752 13,829.54 22 -4637 -8763 47,630.00 22 -4637 -8755 5,830.00 22- 4637 -8756 10,038.00 22- 4637 -0759 13,666.75 22- 4637 -8760 3,996.27 22- 4637 -8801 1,550.00 Oraina a ieilities 23- 4637 -8155 24,494.00 655.79 23- 4637 -0626 1,750.47 23- 4637 -0761 6,974.50 23- 4637 -8762 207,994.30 23- 4637 -8763 56,940.96 23- 4537 -8765 180.00 23- 4637 -8766 305,062.94 23- 4637 -8802 308,933.68 Capital Reserve 25-4285-7043 25- 4285 -8804 3845,525.42 61,767.00 Grant s C08C 233 -8185 17,649.32 28- 4333 -8187 852.31 28- 4333 -8189 45,C11.12 28- 4333 -8704 2,860.00 i - :,�'= MY Council Staff Report M October 19, 1988 - r a' Page 05 CARRYOVER ORDER SOL - D CARRCHASE 6/30/66 AS OF JLWE 30, 1966 �� kcornt RaaBer atscandfna P,O. JVount �ve a AsOS t i" 33 -4130 -6028 16,776 11 33- 4130 -7044 3,778.90 °._ r: Lam lYfnt /1 General City {� -r. 130 -6029 40- 4130 -8767 5,694.11 54756,18 IN �1't��ria f 41- 4130 -6028 62;125,28 EBnd IYtnt 1 3 Rvssoo 32-4 30-602 — 8 165.50 land !lafnt /4 Terra vista 5,353.00 1 43- 4130 -6028 7,401.00 r Land �afnt. 15 lot lot k �f30P- ac2-- 447.77 16S 7'4225 3930 53,657.35 AD 88-1 rove nt -I 0a_ 40,461.11 Alta laaa -43 7 -6028 1,142.75 V AD 82 -1 6th Street Industrial - - 02 8,757.47 AD 84 Day CV0"liello Bb_ 63 - O2i T8 — 4,006,452.61 AD 84 -1 Debt Service - 3 -3 00 500.00 PD-85 Ilerfta e i roveaent - 3 - 02 264,916.25 PURCILtSE ORDER , CARR10vF1t RAUtRCE AS OF- JWff-r 30, 1966 I . Q�LSta_d{ pi nL 949,402.72 , 57,883.47 ME aT e �'f oatobee 19, 1968 L Page /6• CdRRTO►ER .R r.0's 6/30/6E P045 Red N111- 1 e 228 -M7•m,. AD B6 -2 1 re�e t �4a3i'a—Z. PURCILtSE ORDER , CARR10vF1t RAUtRCE AS OF- JWff-r 30, 1966 I . Q�LSta_d{ pi nL 949,402.72 , 57,883.47 ME aT e �'f CITY Or RANCHO C UCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Ki :uo DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and city manager FROM: Elizabeth Stoddard, Finance manager ,- SUBJECT; 1908 -89 BUDGETARY NIEKNW RECOMMOATION• Approve and authorize an appropriation from the available °.+nd balance of the General and IDS Funds for the purchase rf a 1987 Ford Tempo GL from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. BACKGRnOND: AS part of the 1988 -89 departmental budget submission, an item was omitted from the budgetary process. The City wiches to purchase the 1987 Ford Tempo GL from the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency. The selling price of the Ford is 412,000. Funding requested is 40% from the General Fund ($4,800) to be appropriated to acccttnt number 01- 4637 -7045 and 60% from the IGS Fund ($7,200) to be appropriated to account number 72 -4225- 7045. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Stoddard Finance Manager ES:cm . 27 x w�l■i� — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1938 TO: City Councl'. and City Manager FROM: Russell N, Magutre, City Engineer BY: Patrick Price, Equipment and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor SUBJECT: Recomaondation for award of vehicle purchase to Dieterich InterrALional Truck Sales, Inc. of Colton, CA. in the Ia1 to -he funded7from Account no.001464� one 4 "a land Metro RECO PEMDATI0N: 14MsMetroo 11 dVanufsrtom 0 eterrich International TTruck Sales. Inc. (of Colton, CA, as the lowast responsible bidder, for the amount of $29,773.36. This purchase to be funded from Account No. 014647 -7045 and I.G.S. Background /Analysis At 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday. September 27, 1988, bid proposals for the purchase of nine vehi:les were received and opened in the office of the . The os hisois�doe e of biddi g an any or all of the vehicles listed. lth bid package were: One One (1) each 7tPcssengeriNinl -Van Cne (1) each 8 Passenger Club Van One (I each Utility Natro Van One 1 each Compact Utility Vehicle, Four -Wheel Drive One (1) each Compact Utility Vehicle, Two -Wheal Drive Two (2) each 3/4 Ten Pickup Truck with Modifications One (1) each Mid -Size Extended Cab Pickup Truck The bid package instructions included notice that the City would select received ed by bids as nternationaluTruckdSales. each lqy Auto Cars, and Enterprise Chevrolet. - � r V d i IL �9 Award of Vehicle Purchase `s Ofeterich International Truck Sales October 19, 1988 Page 2 Dieterich Intereatfenal, presented a primary bid per specifications of $33,510.52 for a Metro - Yang -of, the current productioa.'year .•, As -ap _ alternative bid, they presented an option of a new unit 6in'_`stack, for y, $29,773.36, also fn- c*liance,wfth all specifications _ othar- than,cf the f current production year.:: Jhe'sum; total lbudgeted.Is fo a' purchase ofAhe vehicle and equipping: the ,interior .a %:required for" the,�facilities °a s maintenance group. - , The savings -,on the vehicle purchase "will offset the price increases of .the equipment to be added to this vehicle— Therefore, the lowest responsible, bidder would be Dieterich International Truck Sales whose proposal meets or exceeds all specifications as set forth by the City. Respectfu l�_pbmitted, Rki:FP :la Attachment �9 ;,One Utility ►Ifni -Van J:"` p�One 7 Passenger Hinl -Van 8 Passenger Club Van ;,One Utility Diesel #y Metro Van One Compact Utility r 10, 4- Ilheel Drive Vehicle. ;One Compact Utility 2 -111jeei Drive Vehicle �s Twn 3/4 Ton Diesel Pickups With Ibdiricationst One Ilid -Slur Extended Cab Pickup Truck Y VEHICLE 010 SUIOIARV Septrmber'29, 1988 Ole Are lrir ►n�rrnA I Iona 1. C01.1" Ant0 Cnrt h uc laics nc. $13,552.70 $15,041.93 $11,002.43 $29,773.36 7— Ln Ldr.prJsn UirvraL $12,766.67 $14,281.23 $17,825.63 $15,63,62.03 $11,673.41 $14,285.09 $13,092.67 $19,4101.59 racl, $12,390.82 $11,64U.RU ti i m j r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 198e Aiti LL TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Patrick Price, Equipeent and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor SUBJECT: Reco®ondation for Award of Vehicle Purchase to Enterprise Chevrolet of Upland, CA, in the amount of $66.454.80 for the purchase of one (1) Utility Hint -Van, one (1) 7 Passenger Mini -Van, one (1) Compact 4 -Wheel Drive Uti11l�yy Vehicle, one (1) Compact 2 -Wheel Drive Vehicle and one (1) Mid -Size Extended Cab Pickup to be funded from various accounts. RECOIKIOATIOM: It is recommended that the City Council award the purchase of: one (1) Utility Mini -Van, ove (1) 7 Passenger Mfn1 -Van, one (1) Compact Utility 4 -Wheel Drive Vehicle, one (1) Compact Utility 2 -Wheel Drive Vehicle and one (1) Mid -Size Extended Cab Pickup Truck from Enterprise Chevrolet of Upland, CA, as the lowest responsible bidder, for the amount of $66,454.80. Vehicle funding as follows: Vehicle Util 1`59UFT-Van 7 Passenger Mini -Van Compact 4 -Wheel Drive Utility Compact 2 -Wheel Drive Utility Mid -Size Extended Cab Pickup Background /Analysis Account Number 01- 4637 -7045 d IGS 01- 4637 -7045 6 IGS 01- 4641 -7045 01- 4333 -7045 At 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 27, 1988, bid proposals for the purchase of nine vehicles were received and opened in the office of the City Clerk. The proposals were presented to the vendors with the option of bidding any or all of the vehicles listed. Listed in the bid package were: One (1) each Utility Mini -Van One (1) each 7 Passenger Mini -Van One (1) each 8 Passenger Club Van One (1) each Utility Metro Van 1 '--N: _. :r:� �y�.�.t.s{,�= x.•a.a� .l 1" 'tiY`.rrfr! dr _ ttvt."i m fwd of Yehic`ieftrd'se- Enterprfse 'Chevrolet , .`r October 19 `lgb,.% -Page 2 $' One (1) each Compact utility- Yehfcie, Four -Wheal Drive one (1) each'Coalatet utfiity_Yehlcle, Two'Wheel Drive - Two (2) each"3 /< Ten Diasei-rfckup Truck wfth Nodlffcations One (1) eich,'.tffd- SizejExtended,Cab Pickup Truck - The bid paekagt +instructions included notice that '10 City uocld select from the 4ubmltted, bids es individual bids r er each unit. C11ds were receivid by Dieterich International Truck Sales; Colley Auto Cers, and Enterprise Chevrolet; _ -- onterpriso Chevrolet submitted bids fer's1x of the specified vehicles. 0! ttose, Enterprise Chevrolet is. the lowest responsible bidder of' five units, mee^: ng or.exceedfny, all speciflcatfens as set forth by the Cay. r _ Rospectfil TyAsubaitted, d d Attach2ent I L y�- •R� 3 , A my • - `- 1111CLE 010 SU1ltthnt � Srt,l.rmhnr 7.9, 19011 - Y'iYrLir.lr. - Metl•rhh Intrumtlnnnl Cnl try MLLn curt 'i.nlrr prlsn'; e.hry buck Sales nc. 1-One Utility tltnl -Yan 917,552.70•- 512,766,67 R• ' One 7 Passenger tilnl -Yan 515,041.93 $14,281.23 FOne 0 Passenger Club Yen $17,002.43 S17,925.C3 ;Our 11tlllty Diesel iletro Van 529,773.36 C" One Compact Uttlify 4- Ilherl Urlvr VOhlr•I0 Wimp U3 511,671.41 ` IUne Compact Utility 2 -11heel Drive Vehicle 514,205 U9 $U ,1)" h' lnn 114 Inn Ulosel Plcknps NI10 til4tfirItlo„sl iIQ 'fin l.,a Parb Une I114 -5170 rsleudeA Cal, Pickup I;ucY 1;7,390.02 SII,rmu.nU DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCA=NGA STAFF REPORT October 19, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer Patrick Price, Equipment and Vehicle Maintenance Supervisor Recomwndation for award of vehicle purchase tc Cars. Inc. of Glendora. CA, in the amount of $3 toebe�fuunded from Account Mos. 01 ?4647-7045 and RECONEIMTICY: It is recoaoended that the Citr ouncfl award the pure pickups po modifications Colley Cars lowest res^ bidder. or the amount of purchase of the two pickup trucks to be funded from 4647 -7045 and I.G.S. Background /Analysis At 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday. September 27, 1988 purcbase of nine vephicles worm opened in the i any or allsof the vehclestlisted.� Listed oin th One (1) each 7LPasengeriMint-Van One (1) each 8 Passenger Club Van One (1) each Utility Metro Van Otte (1) each Compact Utility vehicle, Four-Wheel Drive One (1) each Compact Utility Vehicle, Two -Wheel Drive Two 2) each 3/4 Ton Pickup Truck with Modifications One (1) each Mid -Size Extended Cab Pickup Truck The bid package instructions included notice that the City would select received by submitted Dieterichid International individual each Co])ey Auto Lars, and Enterprise Chevrolet. ,r ■ Award of Vehicle Purchase Colley Auto Cars, Inc.z October 19, 1988 Pape 2 Colley Auto Cars presented the only responsive bid for the two codified diesel 3/4 tan pickup - trucks and the 8 Passenger Club Van. Therefore, y, this vendor is the lowest responsible - bidder of these units whose proposal meets or exceeds all specifications as set forth by the City. It should be noted that the purchase of the 8 Passenger Club Van was approved in the 1988 -89 RDA Budget Account 10- 51700. Respectful ly,.aubmitted, cc: Jack Lan. ACM/CDD Linda Daniels, Redev. Coordinator r , Y, m 3 7J ``�c J ,13 � .` 1� _. �!Y "i .y'.4�_M.CL,�?S f _•• " _S -� .t.� .`Jy9 y_ #� z, VEHICLE DID SUlU1NtY ,: rrplrmbFr 29, 1990 a J�1tir.Ir UI41•rlrD =tn`r iontlonnI ILuck Sales Inc Lolley PortngGit's lmLr•prlsr LM•vtnt;i 4 +y Joe Utility flint -Van $13,552.70 $12,766_.67 e 7 Passenger Rinl -Van 9 $I5,041.93 $14,281.23 'Me 0 Passenger Club Van $17,0112.43 $17,825.1.. 'se Utility Diesel I!etro Van $29,773.36 '"e Compact I I t I I i ty 4- 11heel Ulhtr Vnllirle $IS,662 Ili $11,671.41 nc Cnmpact Utility .'2 -Uheel Drive Vehicle r'• arm 1/4 Inn Ulesel Pickups fwtth Ilndiflcatlonsl nc Rid -Sl7r Fxtel, led Cab ;Pickup hock $11,285.og $17,"(17.64 Sir, "111.49 rarb $12,190.112 $11,64U,00 r� _C\ .Ji CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9 STAFF REPORT Date: October 19, 1988 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: Henry Murakoshl, Asucfste Civil Engineer Subject: App royal to execute Contract Change Order No. 5 (C.O. 87- 201 for a Professional Services Agreement with Don Greek and Associates to continue design administration and review of plans and specifications for the following projects: 19th Street West City Limits for $18,000 (Account No. 22- 4637- 8743), Hermosa /Cartilla for $16,000 (Account No. 29- 4637 8744), $17.000 for Zircon /Amethyst (Account No. 22_ DO to bring the the Systems Deve RECCIRENDATION: It is recomended to execute Contract and Associates for continuing design projects: 19th Street Nest Zircon /Amethyst, 19th /Haven, Bartyan S Widening. BACXGROUND /ANALYSIS• The firm of Don Greek and Associates studios, project administration and for (our projects on 19th Street, Al to Street Bridge Extension, I -15 /Route 66 It is r.ow necessary to expand their wori:ings encountered: $43,000 for con $15,000 for scope changes to incur driteways oa the 19th Street projects; snd $2,000 for Banyan Street Extensio iota.' amount of $68,000 to bring the paid .'row tha Systems Development Fund. Res iy mltted, RHN :pam to Change Order No. 5 with Don Greek adminsftration for the following City Limfts, Hermosa /Cartilla, treet Extension and Arrow Bridge was engaged to perform predeslgn re view of plans and specifications Loma Assessment District, Banyan and Arrow Route Bridge Widening. contract to cover the additional tinuing the 19th Street projects; de striping, signing, ramps and $8,000 for Arrow Bridge W1dening n. The Change Order is for the contract total to $130,000 to be a ,4 , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Jerry B. Fulwood, Director of Resource Services SUBJECT: Approval- for Reimbursement and Service Agreements for the Proposed Assessment District 89 -1 ILewie Homes). RECONdMENDATION: ' Staff recommends that City Council approve the Reimbursement and Service Agreements in the amount 'of $5,000.00 for.the proposed Assessment District 89 -1 (Lewis Homes). BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has received a request from Lewis Homes to analyze Uie possibility of forming an assessment district. They are willing to advance funding for the initial evaluation and feasibility reviews. Lewis Homes in the future, shall be entitled to a reimbursement Hawever, if no district is formed, then no reimbursement shell occur The approval of the attached Reimbursement and Service Agreements will allow the advance funding and feasibility study to commence The following Service and Reimbursement Agreements are attached for your review: 1 NOS Lowry ( Assessment Engineer) 2 Lewis Homeb Reimbursement Agreement ;arly ectfulsubmit ed, B F ulwood Director of Resource Services JBF:]m Attachments fa it. 0 CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September'~76, 1988 John Goodman Lewis Homes Management Corp. P.O. BOX 670 Upland, CA 91786 REI TERRA VISTA Dear John Goodman: Ia Oam Iv q1, ea se 6� OprW 917A DIO f UJJ The purpose of this letter is to provide an agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Lewis Homes Management Corp. -Lewis Homes" for the provision by the City through NBS /Lowry of certain consultant services to be provided on a time and material basis pertaining to the study of the feasibility of financing certain public improvements required for the Terra Vista development through the establishment of either an assessment district or covmunity facilities district The City agrees that it shall enter into a separate agreement with NBS /Lowry to engage NBS /Lowry to conduct certain feasibility studies on n time and materials basis part:lning t� the financing of the public improvements for Terra Vista. Lewis Homes agrees to deposit with the City the amount of $5,000.00 as an advance to pay for such consultant services Lewis Homes additionally agrees to forward such additional monies as may be requested by the City to pay for consultant services provided by NHS /Lowry in excess of the initial deposit In the event that inadequate funds are on deposit with the City to continue the consulting services, all such services shall be terminated until a deposit is received adequate to pay for such services. In the event that either an assessment district or a community facilities district is formed and bonds %re issued to finance public improvements for Terra Vista, Levis Homes shall be entitled to a reimbursement from the bond proceeds of any monies expended under this Agreement In the event that no such district is formed or no such bonds are issued, Lewic Homes shall not bo entitled to reimbursement for any funds expended pursuant tr this Agreement) provided, however. the City shall return to Lewis Homes any funds deposited hereunder and not previously expended or required for the payment of consultant services provided under this Agreement. C — Mw D.bmb N. &m Jdap K&4 av V, Dmeh LSw Chem J. DAW11 y9 P.1sLWWd La M.Wee,mm - Y.'rs -a1� +' � `rS .Y• �..Y r -� map. a.",".. ��k34'.y <'4rY`_i.: �. - e- m�Ire?ee{•.!ef� -1« :. I @S' +S'�.v�'M1'?VT^a'9i. Y'v�iX paitymay_;terminate this Agreement- at-, anjr- tuns byt yYry gii'ngr3 %day prior written notice to the yotherparty. This le�cbOnititntas the- entire "Agr�emset betveapi the r .- " city 6f'X4cho.Cueamonga and Levis Homes pertaining'_'to ; tibsf provision ° -bf' "•consulting services for such!>'Zeasibilitp- • studies. ' This Agreement shall become affective When accepted by Levis Homes by executing and returning tho original of this letter to the undersigned. CITY or RAHcHo cuchm m THIS AGREEMENT IS ACCEPTED BY LEWIS HGMZS. LEWIS HOMES WAMAdOAvvr Gott Bye Dat Y 9- .20-81 887- 011.003 PROFESSIONAL SLRVICES AGREEMENT This Agreement is made and entered into this dry of , 1988, between the City of Rancho C. amonga, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as •CITY ") and NBS /Lowry, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as 'CONSULTANT-). A. Recitals. (1) CITY desires to retain CONSULTANT to perform profossional services necessary to render advice and assistance to CITY, CITY's Planning Commission, City Council and staff in the preliminary study of public financing for public improvements in connection with the proposed Terra Vista project (•Project• hereafer). (ii) CONSULTANT represents that it is qualified to perform such services and is willing to perform such professional services as hereinafter defined. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between CITY and CONSULTANT as follows: B. Agreement. I. Definitions: The following definitions shall apply to thu following terms, except where the context of this Agreement other'•ise requirese (a) Pry ect: The preliminary study of public financing of public improvements for the Terra Vista project, described In Exhibit W, Lcope of Services hereto, including, but not limited to, the -1 15/ r7 preparation of maps, surveys, reports, and 'documents, the presentation, both oral and in writing, of such plans, maps, surveys, reports and 'documents to CITY as required and attendance at any and all work sessions, public hearings and other meetings condseted by CITY with respect to the project as outlined in the Scope of Services. (b) Services, Such professional services as are necessary to be performed by CONSULTANT in order to complete the project, as described in Exhibit "A ". (c) Completion of Protect: The data of completion Of all phases of the project, including any and all procedures, development plans, maps, surveys, plan documents, technical reports, meetings, oral presentations and attendance by CONSULTANT at public hearings regarding the Project is set forth in Exhibit "8", Project Schedule, attached hereto. 2. CONSULTANT agrees as follows: (a) CONSULTANT shall forthwith undertake and corap73te the project in accordance with Exhibit "A' an' applicable with Federal, State and CITY statutes, regulations, ordinances and guidelines, ali to the reasonable satisfaction of CITY. - (b) CONSULTANT shall supply copies of all maps, surveys, reports, plans and documents (hereinafter collactivoly referred to as "documents ") including all supplemental tochnical documents, as described in Exhibit "A" to CITY within the tine specified in Project Schedule, Exhibit "B". Copies of the documents shall be in such numbers as are required by Exhibit "A ". CT_TY may thereafter review and forward to CONSULTANT comments regarding said -2- �a documents and CONSULTANT shall thereafter make such 1,17 ravinions to said documents as are deemed necessary. CITY shall receive revised documents in ' such form and in the quantities determined necessary by CITY. The tame limits set for k pure-ant to this Section s2. (b) may be extended s upon a written approval of CITY. (c) CONSULTANT shall, at CONSULTANT's sole cost and expenbe, secure and hire such other persons as may, in the opinion of CONSULTANT, be necessary to comply with the terms of this Agreement. In the event any such other persons are retained by CONSULTANT, CONSULTANT hereby warrants that such persons shall be fully qualified to perform services required hereunder. CONSULTANT further agrees that no subcontractor shall be retained by CONSULTANT except upon the prior written approval of CITY. 3. CITY agrees as follows% (a) To pay CONSULTANT a maximum sum of $5,000 for the performance of the services required hereunder. This sum shall cover the cost of all staff time and all other direct and indirect coats or fees, including the work of employees, consultants and subcontractors to CONSULTANT. Payment to CONSULTANT, by CITY, shall be made in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "CO. (b) payments to CONSULTANT shall be made by CITY in accordance with the invoices submitted by CONSULTANT, on a monthly basis, and such invoices shall be paid within 30 calendar days after said invoices are received by CITY. All charges shall be detailed in Exhibit 'C• either with respect to hourly ratee or lump sum amounts for individual tasks. In no event, however, will said invoices exceed 95♦ of -3- 3 'S individual tack totals described in Exhibit "C ', except as Provided in subparagraph (c) immediately following. (c) CONSULTANT agrees that, in no event,' .hall CITY ba required to pay to CONSULTANT any sum ir, excess of 95% of the maximum payable hereunder prior to receipt by CITY of all final documents, together with all supplemental technical documents, as described herein acceptable in form and content to CITY. Final payment shall be made not later than 60 days after presentation of final documents and acceptance thereof by CITY. H (d) Additional services: Payments for additional services requested, in writing, by CITY, and not included in the Scope of Services as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereof, w shall be paid on a reimbursement basis in accordance with the C' fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "D ". Charges for additional services shall be invoiced on a monthly Lr.&Ja and J shall be paid by CITY within 30 calendar days a.ter said invoices are received by CITY. 4. CITY agrees to provide to CONSULTANT: (a) Information and assistance as set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. (b) Photographically reproducible copies of maps and other information, if available, whirh CONSULTANT considers necessary in order to complete the project. (c) Such Information as is generally available from CITY files applicable to the project. (d) Assistance, if necessary, in obtaining information from other governmental agencies and /or private _4_ 5 ( •2i r }! parties. However, it shall be CONSULTANT's responsibility to .a make all initial contact with respect to the gathering of such } information. a S• 5. Ownership of Documents: All documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports prepared by CONSULTANT pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered the property of CITY and, upon payment for services performed by CONSULTANT, such documents and i, other identified materials shall be delivered to CITY by 4 CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT may, however, make and retain such ;I copies of said documents and materials as CONSULTANT may desire. Any use or reuse of the plans and specifications except at the site intended or any alteration or revision of the plans or specifications by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents without the specific written consent of the CONSULTANT shall be at the sole risk of the CITY. The CITY agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the CONSULTANT against all damages, claims and losses including defense costs arising out of any such alteration or revision, or use or reuse at another site by the CITY, its staff or authorized agents. 6. Termination: This agreement may be terminated by CITY upon the giving of a written •Notice of Termination" to CONSULTANT at least fifteen (15) days prior to the date of termination specified in said Notice. In tho event this Agreement is so terminated, CONSULTANT shall be compensated at CONSULTANT's applicable hourly rates as se-t forth in Exhibit "D", on a pro -rata basis with respect to the percentage of the project completed as of the date of termination. In no event, however, shall CONSULTANT receive more than the maximum specified in paragraph 3 (it), above. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY any and all documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs and reports, whether in draft or final form, prepared by -5- � F CONSULTANT as of date of termination. CONSULTANT may not it terminate this Agreement except for cause. t {a 7. Notices and Designated Representatives Any and all notices, demands, invoices and written communications between the parties hereto shall be addressed as set forth in this Paragraph 7. The below named individuals, furthermore, shall be those persons primarily responsible for the performance by the parties under this Agreemont: CONSULTANT Richard A. Busermann, Vice President NBS /Lowry, P 0. Box 8121 San Bernardino, CA 92412 (714) 988 -1401 CITY Jerry Pulwood, Director of Resource Services City of Rancho Cucamonga P O Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 17141 989 -1851 Any such notices, demands, invoices and written communications, by mail, shall be deemed to have been received by the addressee forty -eight 1481 hours after deposit thereof in the United States mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as not forth abovo. 8 Insurance, CONSULTANT shall neither commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder in a company or companies acceptable to CITY nor shall CONSULTANT allow any subcontractor to commence work on a subcontract until all insurance required of the subcontractor has been obtained CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurances (a) worker's Compensation Insurances Before beginning work, CONSULTANT rhall furnish to CITY a certificate of insurance as proof that it has taken out full workers' compensation insurance for all persons whom it may -6-/ v'.Z! �A �4� s J employ directly or through subcontractors in carrying out the work specified herein, in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 3700, every employer shall secure the payment of compensation to his employees. CONSULTANT prior to commencing work, shall sign and file with CITY a certification as follows: "I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employe-* to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with ouch provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement ". (b) Public Liability and Property Damage: Throughout the term of this Agreement, at CONSULTANT's sole coat and expense, CONSULTANT shall keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of CITY and CONSULTANT, comprehensive, broad form, general public liability and automobile insurance against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from CONSULTANT's activities, providing protection of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for bodily injury or death to anyone person or for any one accident or occurrence and at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for property damage. (c) Errors and Omissions: CONSULTANT shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this Agreement, a policy or policies of insurance concerning errors and omissions ("malpractice ") providing protection of at least $1,500,000 for errors and omissions ( "malpractice") with respect to loss arising from actions of CONSULTANT performing engineering services hereunder on behalf of CITY. _7_ 57 0 s (d) General Insurance Requirementst All insurance required by express, provision of this Agreement shall be carried only in responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of California and policies required Zunder paragraphs 8.(a) and (b) shall name as additional Lnaurede CITY, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents. All policies shall contain language, to the ' extent obtainable, to the effect that (1) the insurer, �7 insured and all subcontractors waive the right of subrogation a against CITY and CITY 'e elected officials, officers, employees, and agents; (2) the policies ar-t primary and ps noncontributing with any insurance that may be carried by CITY; and (3) they cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to CITY by certified mail. CONSULTANT shall furnish CITY with copies of all such liciee po promptly upon receipt of them, or certificate evidencing the insurance. CONSULTANT may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. 9. Indemnifications CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and save harmless CITY, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees, from all liability from loss, damage or injury to persons or property, including the payment by CONSULTANT of any and all legal coats and attorneys' fees, in any manner arising out of any negligent or intentional or willful acts or omissions of the CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement, including, but not limited to, all consequential damages, to the maximum extent permitted by law. 10. Assignments No assignment of this Agreement or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of CITY. -S- SK M �3' ,r p • �� °wiYw: �'FY C'v '� A "d..✓- .`�ii�4u:�e -�` ^,k° r -y : r+' i.4' "•. 11. Indif ple dnt Contractors The parties hereto agree that CQX`MiNT,: and, °it■ employers, officers and agents ;are - . independent coatracfoa under this Agreement and'ahall'lrlo aot be eonstrued-for any purpose to ba employees of CITY. L 12. Ciwernina Law: This Agreement shall be governed, by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 13. Attornav'e Pees: In t`:e event any legal proeeedtng is instituted to enforce any term or provision of the Agreement, the prevailing party in said legal proceeding shall be entitled to recover attorneys' fees and costs from the opposing party in an amount determined by the Court to be reasonable. :• 14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes any and all other ag•.•eements, either oral or in writing, between the parties with reapect to the subject matter herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representation by any party which is not embodied herein nor any other agreement, statement, or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid and binding. Any modification of this Agreement shall 'be effective only if it is in writing 4 signed by all parties. -9- , e IN WITNSBS WBEREOP, the parties hereto have executed this Agreesnt as of the day and year first set forth above: C/ONSSOLTANTt NBS /I.OWRY VICE PRESIDENT Date CITY OF RAN, °O CUCAMONGA Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Date ATTEST: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney -10- 00 EXHIBIT •A• SCOPE OF SERVICES #, 0 Meet with proponents and City staff as required. kr,t 0 Coordinate with financial consultant, tax rate rv� consultant, underwriter, bond counsel, Foothill Fire 17� Protection District and City staff as required. a ,r 0 Identify public improvements to be considered for e� funding by Mello -Roos Community Facility District and /or Assessment District financing. '; 0 Estimate areas of benefit for the various probable _ public improvements to be financed. 0 Estimate total amount to be financed. 0 Describe feasible methods of determining and levying special taxes and /or assessments. iry iln e � EXHIBIT 'Bo PROJECT SCHEDULE The work described in Exhibit •A• shall be completed within 90 calendar drys unless extended by mutual agreement. o! 12 6C;)L EXHIBIT •C` 'SCHEDULE OP ESTIMATED FEES Basic Services - services shall be billed monthly on a time end materials basis ilk accordance with Exhibit •D•, not to exceed $51000. Additional Services - Reimbursement at hourly rates per Exhibit 'D'. -13- ( i' � 71 i t i Z } • EXHIBIT "D" /�� 76.00 ENGINEERS & PLANNERS 76.00 SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BUIJNG RATES . . . . . . A Effective, July 1, 1988 62.70 ORIRt 31.00 tI 31.00 Senior Principal Consultant 47.00 princi consultant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11015!.•000 0 pal . . Senior Principal tn410aet . . . . . . . . 72.00 . Principal engineer . . . . . • . • . . . . . • 76.00 Assistant, engineer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7enior in r . 64.00 77.00 r . . .t eaglaeer . . . . . . . . Ccgltlesr . . 42 00 Assa . . . . . Assistant tistant [agianc ... 4A .S0 PLAMNIft0 76.00 Principal Planner, . • . . • • • . • • . • . . . • • 72.00 Assistant Principal Planner . . . . . . . . 61.00 Senior Planner . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71.00 Planaet Pluer� tn 47.00 Assoclate Resistant Planner . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44.70 OtSION Ado DsAPTm 93.00 Senior Designer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • !1.00 Designer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3.00 Senior Orator . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.00 Drafter II . . . . • . . . . . . • . . 11.00 Drafter O • . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . • . . 11.00 Delineator . . . . . . . . . . • • . . . . taglneetinq Aide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26.00 r2tft)e CONSTLOCTICN )WAOtitm 76.00 Principal engineer . . 76.00 senior Ilaaideat engineer . . . . . • . e • . . . . . . . Senlor ?an' act sepreeentative• 62.70 Resident Cngineet 31.00 Project Representative . . . . . . 31.00 Associate Proleot Saprotent+tive . . . . . . . 47.00 Senior Inspector . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.60't'DLtect Salary Inspector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.60 s Direct Salary SoPVtyI140 71.00 Principal Surveyor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62.00 Assistant Principal Surveyor . . . . . . . . . . . . . Supervising Suzvvyoc 37.30 Survey Crew with tflaipaent 2. io•: Diiwe 7alary Travel Time - (when in excess of eight hours wrk time per dry( . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 1.40 z Direct Salary 32AV1CLS AND ZXP&43ZSs Computer. Central Processing Unit (CPO) . . . . . . . . . . 1SC /Second COMect Time, pat Maur . . . . 10.00 Ielatin9 • • • • • 1.50/100 - •roes Statage (1000 characters)• . . . . . . . . . . . 450/Month Minlaum 25.00 Computer Analyst 71 00 Progtamur 3].00 42.00 Technician 11.00 .•searcher /PCOC6asgr . . . . . SoCrttery . . . . . . 33.00 executive and Administrative . . . . . . . . . . 0oca entry . . • . 31.00 21.00 Secretary/Clark Coat Li -house Reproduction . . . . . . . . 24C /M11e Milsage . . . . . . . • Cost subsistence . Other expenses - ln;ludlnq 6pecial Consultants 136 and Purchased Services through Suhcourtacts . . . . . . . Cost • 6101p vtee tnctude ave sad, mdoo Mf. Ipeal fvnrt/ etc. that btmnq lutes ere subject to inrmf0 nU y"' Ow to U.1,, IOMeenfl and help (nQeares• A lot@ pevmcnf PINAMCC CNAACf WN be Walled to env woad belence. • /ter tM ca-~91b q thirty tfat My' sees of the angmaynrmce at the ee�•ew} .n Mretl nb u4-N oY lw• &too 1 /� -(7L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: October 19, 1968 To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer By: John L. Martin, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Approve and execute Professional Services Agreement with J.F. Davidson for the Master Plan Beautification Study for Haven Avenue and Base Line Road, to be funded by Beautification Funds it the total amount of $42,000 as $16,000 Real) and $26,000 f ,000 ffrromcAccount oNo. 2144647- 8724s(Haven Avenue). RECOMMEMPATToM: Approve and execute Professional Services Agreement with S.F. Davidson for the Master Plan Beautification Study for Haven Avenue and Base Line Road, to be funded by Beautification Funds in the total amount of $42,000 as follows: $16,000 from Account No. 21- 4647 -8047 (Base Line Road? .nd 526,000 from Account No. 21 -4647 -8724 (Haven Avenue). BACKGROUW /AYALYSIS• The Engineering Staff has recently terminated the contract with an architectural fine for failure to perform, who were working an 2 of 6 of the Master Plan Beautification Studies presently in process of design, namely Haven Avenue Parkways and Base Line Road Parkways. The fine of J.F. Davidson, Inc. have been assisting staff for the last 6 months on review of the 6 ongoing studies and have prepared some 'fast track" designs for the City as were needed. After negotiations concerning time schedules for completion of the studies and finished product documents, it was determined that the firm of J.F. Davidson, Inc. could provide a "fast track' product in conformance with the City's guidelines. The completed study for Haven Parkways should be ready for final approval in 10 weeks and for Base Line Road Parkways in 14 weeks, from date of the Notice to Proceed. The attached agreements are the result of the stated negotiations and are submitted for approval and execution. Respec Y) s mitted, RHM:JLH:pam �5— 01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAASONGA STAFF, REPORT ,c DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council, and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer ' SUBJECT: Execute contract for the City Corporation Yard, Phase I, base Bid 'A' including alternate 4 deduction Improvement Project located at 9153 Ninth Street awarded to Lucky Construction Coxpany for the mount of S2,20L%000 ($2,098,C00 plus 55 contingency) to be funded from Capital Reserve, Account No. 25 -4205 -7043. RECOINEwATIoN: It is recommended that City Ceunctl authorize the Mayor and City Clerk "to execute Improvement Project LBdocuments e d 'A' Including ater Corporation deductioonn3eand authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $2,200,000, ($2.098,000 plus 5% contingency) to be funded from Capital Reserve, Account No. 24- 4285 -7043. Background /Analysis On Septezber 7, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Lucky Construction Company. Staff has received from Lucky Construction, revviieved executed found contract documents. o pletesanddin insurance ce withnthe contract proposal. WRespe 119) subm�itte�d,� cc: Purchasing tifk e i b 1 0 RECOM "TIOM: It is -.=commended that City Council authorize the mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Ninth Street Rehabilitation Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend 2120,330.00, ($109,388.65 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Gas Tax Account No. 09- 4637 -8815. Background /Analysis On September 21, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Gentry Brothers, Inc. Staff hcs received from Gentry Brothers, Inc., executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to he complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Respect�l . su9mtd, RHm:J 'j OF RANCHO CUCAI,IONGAt' -?+ 9ry Y ' STAFF REPORT ii• :V. u l� ! V r, DATE: October 19. ,988 TO: city Council and City manager r ;RON: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Joel Lazo, Jr. Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Ninth Street Rehabilitation Improveaent Project between Vineyard Avenue and Baker Avenue awarded to Gentry Brothers, Inc. for the aaount of No. 0354637L8815nq ) to be funded from Gas Tax(Fund,Account plus RECOM "TIOM: It is -.=commended that City Council authorize the mayor and City Clerk to execute the contract documents for the Ninth Street Rehabilitation Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend 2120,330.00, ($109,388.65 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Gas Tax Account No. 09- 4637 -8815. Background /Analysis On September 21, 1988, City Council awarded the subject project to Gentry Brothers, Inc. Staff hcs received from Gentry Brothers, Inc., executed contract documents, bonds and insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to he complete and in accordance with the contract proposal. Respect�l . su9mtd, RHm:J 'j CITY OF RANCHO CUCA31ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Richard L. Alcorn SUBJECT: RENEIiAL OF THE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO I. R -- reEi�aTIOoN.Cont act Servl�cesdwith the county ofCouncil San Bernardino to provide weed abatement programs and the removal of non- combustible junk and salvage material for a period of five (5) years. II. BACKGROU: The City of Rancho County Department �of Agriculture nttocprovide fire haza�d weed agreement wilt be ccooncludedias of Decpember 31, five 1988. yyears. This This cortract service is currently administrated by the Planning the Division, , Code by nCity office. staff, havelaconsistently� received immediate attention. This responsiveness has been assisted by a cooperative working relationship between City staff and the County Hazard Abatement Officers. Routine abatement of weeds, tumbleweeds and combustible debris on property within the City is achieved through two (2) yearly programs. Beginning in April and August of each fear, the Hazard Abatement Officer surveys all properties to determine if hazardous conditions exist. Subsequently, notices are sent to property owners requesting abatement. If removal of weeds and other combustibles does not occur, the County contracts with outside firms to provide clean -up and abatement. III. ANALYSIS: The new Agreement is essentially the same as for the prey ous five (5) year period. The total cost for the prograv shall not exceed $12,50 per year. The actual sum will be based a.� the total indirect program costs, less any surplus fees owner and, s necessary. assessedato� that property ts aelien pheld by the County. P O ■ L% Renewal ofiAgreement-witb County of San Bernardino; for -Weed- Abatement Services Ocfuber 19; 1988-1 = fit= ;6 - -�� l3y,• Page 2 • -.,W„ ° : >1 �, "�:'� This new agreement does differ from the previous one by the addition of abatement authority for non - combustible junk and y salvage. This change will allow the County td °include removal of wa non - combustible, materials which impede the 'effective abatement of �• fire hazards within the City. In addition, once the City adopts a !Y`. Nuisance Abatement Ordinance, conditions which have been processed i for abatement action by the City can'be referred to the County for F,• completion through this Agreement. The County will use their k regular abatement Procedure to obtain bids, assign a Contract, carry costs initially, and then assess the property to recover costs. t, This additional provision is not anticipated to increase program o-. costs. The County will utilize this provision only in conjunction with Fire Hazard Abatement which Is, normally performed, unless the City directs them to abate a Nton -Fire Hazard Nuisance. r Iv. CONCLUSION: The existing agreement and weed abatement program have ve pron a an effective means of mitigating fire hazards on ' vacant and developing property within the City at a nominal cost. ,t. The program has been used as + resource by the Code Enforcement staff in resolving violations. The addition of provisions f -jr non- combustible items will give the program even greater value. Until such time as the quantity of vacant and developing properties diminishes, the County Need Abatement Program is a cost effective end comprehensive way to deal with fire hazards and nuisances present in Rancho Cucamonga. Ale 11 1t s ner BB:RA:ns Attachments: Previous Agreement - Contract CO -83 -30 New Agreement . -,.. � � -- .rte" .,, _:.. +:ems } �'"• "- AGnta}1eRS 2 �- e ) THIS AGnCV1Z1AT, is node and entered into this .Trt4 a day of and is by and between r-uunty 5 Of San Bernardino, a Aolitical subdivision of the State of 6 California, hereinafter referred to as COUtiTY, and the City of 7 Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred a to 29 RANCHO CUCAMONGA. 9 NITItP.9H¢TH t 10 wN¢R¢Ae, COUNTY is currently csrryiiq Out a weed 11 abatement program under t-he authority of San Bernardino County 12 Code Section 37.031 at seq., and this program In being Conducted 11 in the County service Area No. 701 imvrcvemsnt Zone A, by the IA County Agricultural COtmLASIOner, and 15 t1HBReAB, RANCHO CUCA110NOA is situated nsar to said pis 16 County Service Area No. 70 and is presented with wood abatement .a�S 17 tasks similar to those at COUNTY, and is empowered to carry out tie is woad abatement programs, and •c��„� 19 IOICR¢AS, each of the parties to this agroemen- desires 20 I that a unified, Joint program be put in °°oration to beat .1'1 a 21 proosea utth wood abatement In the territories oi each of these Z2 parties, 21 HON, 7HCRCFOPt, it is agreed and covanantid by the 24 unlarsignad public entities e/ follwet 2S 1. The County Agricultural Commissioner shall conduct 26 an Jonas- weed abatement Pro grsm in the territorial linits of 27 the City of Rancho Cucamonga, pursuant to provisions o! tP�i 70 Gan Bernardino ouney , an rules, and ragulatione, and 29 condltlona agreed to by COUNTY and RANCHO CUCAMONGA toj its 10 territory. The conditions shal be as follows, 11 a. COUNTY wi11 not be responsible for cl_ea4ing At tvt 32 cased/ along roadsides or alleys within the city boundaries of 7: •g2 37 RANCHO GA coreann This service will be ne -0 Y R -NOO 71 CUCAMONGA osreonnel, 35 b. PAW110 CUCAMONGA-nwned property will be 16 treated as private property and billed separately•lrtae this -1. 70 - — 3 I 1 agreement. 2 a. The sbatsnart service lee will be based on ] t'fe fatal indirect grogram coat• los Any surplus fees over the 1 dirsc! croOtr df abatement, S 2. In cnnsideration for the oarformanco of paragraph 6 1 above, oertaining to territory at RANCHO CUCAHnNCA, RANCHO B Flva Hundred 7 CUCAH an shall pay to COUNTY a sum not to exceed Waive Thousand ted Dol l:. re I41+ 500 00) or v s. The actual sum wi•11 9 be determined by the Agricultural Commissioner pursuant to the 10 computation as Proved by paragraph 1 a., b., and C. above, who 11 will than p:uvide the City of Rancho CucaMGnga with said computati 22 along with the reggeA-t_fot.paymOnt_ thereof. '_ RANCHO CUCAMONCA 13 shall then Send "payment eo the Agr�turral Canai_eo!_oner. II The F!vment shall be In two portions. 15 The first portion ahall be dug and pall 'within the brat al;t months of eat cantroat pC' 16 Year, and Shall be In the Amount of one -halt of the maximum 17 am mentioned in lhSs paragraph. My balance due or adjustment .�.. la at the and of the contract year shall be paid at Se end of the S m: 19 wntract year. -- - - P— - Z�`1'. 20 3. T)lif agreement shall remain in Lull farce and 'a 21 Offset from year to year, unless terminated, for a Period of 2i f.ve (5) yearn. It may be terminated by either party hereto 23 upon written notice delivered prior to January 1, of any year. 21 HOCK• to COUNTY Shall be to the Clark of the Board at 25 Supervisors. Notica to RANCHO CUCANONGA shall be to the City 26 Clerk, City Of Rancho Cunamon;a. 27 1. COUNTY shall submit to RANCHO CUCAMONGA 28 than January 1, of each . not Ater a 29 this agreement, which May be,In the amount sot 012•SOO.00l per ? for 30 year.or higher. It no new sun L so Jl oravlow eery Coiling by COUNTY the Y v Ceiling sum shall be applicable for the On24inq ,AClvk 32 year, RANCHO CUCIUIONC* shall have sixty days in which to rejsct ,2 -29 -0233 such new sum and terminate this agreement. Otherwise, this 71 I.graement shall be in feel. force and Offset With the designated �5 ceiling sum applicable. However, as always, thO 36 . . . . actual sum for -2. 7/ 1 I r 1 r i 1 1 will W determined by the Agricultural Commissioner as 1 e each ys•r w 3 s stated In P P•r +9r•ph 2 •vows. � 3 3 A ATTZs.r1 I I COVK:'Y Or tAN BLRNARDINCI 4 A AIMIM- DIBNA40ON, Clerk Of Q O the nunrd o O L S S 6 By iYtN 4. 7 " ATTPSTI 10 CITY CLERK „ 11 r 13 P .� +• 1) 't.. 16 "PRown A6 To ''ORR iy f� 16 Date$ 17 AtAN R. t4 M5 + County Counesl Tits 16 zr4� if BY 's[ii 10 6Y 31 31 23 24 33 36 37 30 29 30 31 PA.IvR )2 rV -83 33 36 3S 36 . ,. C: • rilh,. Board of supervisors JUN 06 M3 CITY Or RARC110 CUCAI•7NGA ^ "Appme D'Am To n7a.. Petal City AttorneY. City of A90CM Cuc monge 7�)- a 1 i i Q t �s 81a �j A G R A R N F I N T 3 THIS AGREEMENT, 18 made and entered Into this day 4 Of 1488, and is by and between COUNTY Op 5 SAN BERNARDINO, a political subdivision of the State of Callfor- 6 nia, hereinafter referred to as -COUNTY., and the CITY OF RANCHO 7 CUCAMONGA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as S 'RANCHO CUCAMONGA ". 9 10 WITNESSETHr it 12 WHEREAS, COUNTY is currently carrying out a weed abate - 13 ment Program under the authority of San Bernardino County Code S 14 23.031 et seq., and this program Is being conducted in the County 15 Service Area No. 70, Improvement Zone A, by the County AgsICUl- 16 tural Commissioner, and 17 WHEREAS, RANCHO CUCAMONGA in situated near to said t8 County Service Area No. 70 and Is presented with weed abatement 19 tasks similar to those of COUNTY, and is empowered to carry out 20 weed abatement programs, and also might have within its incorpor- 21 ated territory some private property P Y upon which there may be 22 accumulated non - combustible junk and salvage material in illegal 23 open storage, and, 24 WHEREAS, each of the parties to this Agreement desires 25 that a unified, joint program be put In operation to best proceed 26 with weed abatement in the territories of each of these parties, 27 and In the RANCHO CUCAMONGA incorporated territory, the occasion - 28 al abatement by removal of illegal open storage of non- combust- 29 able junk and salvage, 30 NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed and covenanted by the 31 undersigned public entities as followse 32 1. The County Agricultural Commissioner shall conduct 33 an annual weed abatement program, and abatement of illegal non - 54 combustible junk and salvage in open Storage, as determined 35 necessary by both of these contracting parties, in the territor- 36 Sal limits of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, pursuant to provi- ,�,.,.,., -73 Y s a8 s I 1 sions of the San Bernardino County Code, and rules, and regula- 2 tions, and conditions agreed to by COUNTY and RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3 for its territory. The conditions shall be as follows: 4 a. COUNTY will not be responsible for cleaning 5 weeds along roadsides or alleys within the city 6 boundaries of RANCHO CUCAMONGA. This service will 7 be performed by RANCHO CUCAMONGA personnel. 8 b. RANCHO CUCAMONGA -owned property will be treated 9 as private property and billed separately from this 10 Agreement. 11 c. The abatement service fees will be based on the 12 total indirect program costs less any surplus fees 13 over the direct costs of abatement. 14 2. In consideration for the performance of paragraph 1 IS above, pertaining to territory of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RANCHO CUCA- 16 MONGA shall pay to COUNTY a sum not to exceed Twelve Thousand 17 Rive Hundred Dollars ($12,500) per year. The actual sum will be 18 determined by the Argicultural Commissioner pursuant to the com- 19 putation as provided by paragraphs 1 a., b., and c., above, who 20 I will then provide the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA with said computa- 21 tions along with the request for payment thereof. RANCHO CUCA- 22 MONGA shall then send such payment to the Agricultural Commis - 23 1 stoner. The payment shall be In two (2) portions. The first 24 portion shall be due and paid within the first six (6) months of 25 each contract year, and shall be in the amount of one -half (1/2) 26 of the maximum sum mentioned in this paragraph. Any balance due 27 or adjustment at the end of the contract year shall be paid at 28 the end of the contract year. 29 3. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect 30 from year to year, unless terminated, for a period of five (5) 31 years. It may be terminated by either party hereto upon written 32 notice delivered prior to January 1 of any year. Notice to 33 COUNTY shall be to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Notice 34 to RANCHO CUCAMONGA shall be to the City Clerk, CITY OF RANCHO 35 CUCAMONGA. 36 4. COUNTY shall submit to RANCHO CUCAMONGA# not later uummi...rull 7 2 I .: tt Y all 11J °u 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 tp than January 1 of each year, a proposed new sum as a ceiling for this Agreement, which may be in the amoung of Twelve Thousand Five Hundred Dollars (S12,S00) per year, or higher. IfIno nei, sum is so proposed by COUNTY, the previous year's coiling sun' shall be applicable for the ensuing year. RANCHO CUCAMONGA shall have sixty (60) days in which to reject such new sum and termi- nate this Agreement. Otherwise, this Agreement shall be in full force and effect with the designated ceiling sum applicable. However, as always, the actual sum for each year will be deter- mined by the Agricultural Commissioner as stated In paragraph 2, above. DATED: ATTEST: MARTHA M. SCUDDER, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Deputy DATED: ATTEST: CITY CLERK By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ALAN K. MARKS County Counsel By: PA L A. GRUBE, JR Deputy County Cou sel COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO By JOHN JOYNER, Cha rman Board of Supervisors By: _ 7� -3- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY City of Rancho Cucamonga y: 41 .: ' - -'E .��1� ye=y s_':,C; � 1 ti" r_ ;.`•�tt :'w 71`J CITY OF RANCHO. CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT October 19; 1968 City Council and City Xanager FFROX: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Dave 8levins, Xaintenance Superintendent Execute contract for Design of the Red Hill Park Lake and Amphitheater DSurveyors, ers/Land Inc. for the amount Linville (514,800 10% plus a contingency) to be funded from Capital Reserve fund Account No. 254285 -7043 RECCMIEt MTI0H: ty ed the I Is Agreement w�ithndLinville Civil Engineers/Land Surveyors foridesign oficRed Hill Park Lake and AWhitheater drainage improvements and authorize the Xyyor and City Clerk to execute said agreement. Project to be funded from Capital Reserve Fund, Account :lo. 254285 -7043. BAW3P7UND /ANALYSIS Previous Council action awarded the design of the above reference project to Linville Civil Engfneers/Land Surveyors of Rancho Cucamonga. The contract documents are submitted to Council at this time for approval and execution. Rasp t submitted, J RHH:D8:Ia Attachment .t •1 . a f ?;;gym'. r � �� -n,�•y ;+n. �'{ CITY OF RANCHO rUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell M. Maguire, City Engineer BT: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of an Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of Declaration of Restrictions for Tract 13271, located o� the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Company REC09OWT10M It is recommended that City Council adopt Vhe attached resolution approving the subject agreement for Tract 13271 and authorizing the City Clerk to cause same to record. Analysis/Background Tract 13271, located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Milliken Avenue, was approved by the City Council on September 7, 1988. The developer, Lewis Development Company, is submitting an Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of Declara on of Restrictions until occupancy. Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clark's office. Respec 71 O tted, ` i `{ RIIM:LB. Attachments M , 74? RESOLUTION NO. V. A RESOLIffION OF THE-,CITY,COI,'NCIL OF-THE CITY OF RANCHO Ali CUCAMONGA., CALIFORNIA, APPROVIRG AM AGREEME0 FOR POSTPONEMENT OF RECORDATION OF DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS FOR TRACT 13271 WHEREAS, to meet the requirements, as a prorejuisite to approval of building permits for Tract 13271, the Lewis subdivider of said tract, Development Company, has submitted an Agreement for Postponement of Recordation of Restrictions; and WHEREAS, said agreeKnt wets the requirement of the Plann;ng Comfssfon conditions and a declaration of restrictions will be recorded prior to obtaining occupancy. NOW. THEREFORE, THE CITY COICIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CLVMXGA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESCLVES as follows: 1. That said agreement be and the saw is approved and the Mayor Is authorized to execute saw on behalf of said City and the City Clark is authorized to attest thereto and and cause same to be recorded upon said execution. 74? ti i, V e a a BASF "HE ROAD rY � ®Q "reRRA Vu7'A "Axw" C �V CITE' OF rML. RANCHO CUCAIIONGA Mn rR ,sz„ ENGMEMMG DrMON EXEM31D 7F CITY OF RANCHO CMAMONGA STAFF REPORT" DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell N. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Liyhttng Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Parcel MoD 11341, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by Lewis Development Co. RECGIENMTIOY It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions orderinggtherannexMation13to , Landscappe Maintena cecDlst ctmNo. 4dand Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS/BACKGRUUNO Parcel Map 11341, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, in the Mospftal Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission or. March 9, 1988, for the division of 11.61 acres into 1 parcel. The Developer, Lewis Development Co., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site 4pprovements in the following amounts: Traffic Signal Master Planned Church Street Foothill and Storm Drain Milliken to Milliken Line 6 Orchard Faithful Performance $110,000.00 $180,000.00 $302,000.00 Labor and Material $ 55,000.00 $ 90.000.00 $151,000.00 Monumentation S 2,450.00 N/A N/A Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from the Cucamonga County Water District. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation fore signed by the Oeveloper is on file in the Cfty Clerk's office. Respec J.d13q submitted, /YY i RH4 Ltr Attachmiu 86 Y' :$mss` ' }�'�Y`��- f.� ° x=•K� i wi`"r.v -. til, -: �''' -•�y�i �:�� U '�C+ F p V RESOLUTION NO. ' A RESOLUTION OF,THE'CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO ye CUCANGNOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUIB:R 11341, (TENTATIVE PARCEL'•W' NO. 11341), - IlPROYEMEW: AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY' , WHEREAS, Tentative ,Parcel Map No: `11341, s6mitted by Lewis`' Development Co., and consisting „of L- parcel, located on the southeast corner 9 of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, being'# division of a portion-of, Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Nap 7267 per. map 'recorded'in Book 78, pages 43 and 44 of , Parcel Maps in the office of the COUntj- Recorder or San Bernard;ro County, State of California, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City -of,' Rancho Cucamonga on March 9, 1988; and , WHEREAS. Parcel vep No. 11341 is the final map of the division of lan,i approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Map;and WHEREAS, all of 'the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the final map by the'City Council of said City have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement Ouarantted by acceptable Improvement Security by Lewis a velopment Co. as developer. NOW, THEREFORE, BT IT RESOLYED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted ly said &velope° be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereoy authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of th3 City of ancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest; and that said Parcel Map No. 11341 be and the saw is hereby approved aM the C1,- Engineer is authorized to present same to the County Recorder to be Ailed for record. U '�C+ F ,-o RESOLUTION N0. 7 8 �I q A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAW)GA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING T4E ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 FOR PARCEL NAP 11341 WHEREAS, the City"Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously finned a special maintenance district pursuant to the art 2 of °the`Streetsdand HighwaysLCgde`iof the Statelof Califgrnta.ssaidl5, special maintenance districts known and designated as Landscape Mhintenance Maintenance Districct No.i4h(heereinaifterareferried to`as °the 'Matntenanceighttng District'); and WHEREAS, gtghe provisions of Article 2 of Ctapter 2 of the terrttorying and ane MalntengnAct of District; and orize the annexation of additional WHEREAS, at this time the City COU-1cil is desirous to take attached proceedings ncorporated herein xby`�this refer`rencedrtoethe Maintenance District, end `0 and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed ,,p be annexed to the Maintenance Of strict have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineer's 'Report'. NOW. THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are ail true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation described inrExhibitOB attached Exhibit hereto and to the Maintenance mDistrict. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including 198 lery of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. ASSESSMENT ir DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 •.I S.�is�W Y CITY Of RANCHO CUCA1[ONGA w COUNTY Ot 8AN BWARDWO =: STATII OF CAI.U�ORNIA IT - -- - S.�is�W Y CITY Of RANCHO CUCA1[ONGA w COUNTY Ot 8AN BWARDWO =: STATII OF CAI.U�ORNIA IT - -- v EXHIBIT 08' PROJECT NAME PARCEL MAP 11341 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 1 pcl: 11.61 acres NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 23 units STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of La s to be Annexed 10,UU0 22,000 District No. 1 - -- 10 10 ___ 4 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT District No. 4 Turf Street Name Sq. ft. Milliken Avenue Median Church Street Median Parkways Ground Cover Trees Se, ft. Ea. 7,115 5,395 69 e' •:7 ,- �rM i y — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Maps, Improvement Agreements and improvement Security and Ordering the Annezatirn to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13850, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue, submitted by M. J. Brock and Sons RECON OMTIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions app?*oving Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, accepting the subject agreements ana security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreements and to cause said cups to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Tracts 13748, 13857 and 13858, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue, in the Low Medium Development District, were approved by the Planning Commission on December 9, 1987, for the division of 65 acres into 232 lots. The Developer, M. J. Brock and Sons, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: STORM DRAIN TR 13748 TP 13748 TR 13857 TR 13858 Faithful Performance Bond: $1,665,000 $106,000 $ 94,000 $ 98,000 Labor and Material Bond: $ 832,000 S 53,000 S 47,000 $ 49,000 Monumentation N/A S 7,550 S 5,900 $ 5,450 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Staff Report October 19 1988 Tracts 13748, 13857 6 13858 Pa,e 2 Letters of approval 'ave been received Water District' C C.&R.'sehwnalao schoolppdistricts and .ucamon9a County Consent and Waiver to Annexation form signd by by the City Developer tis on silo in the City Clerk's office. roved ResyestfollY spbmttted,. FM:LB:dAA:lso Attachments RESOLUTION N0, p 9 - 015— A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREFIENTS IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 13711;, 13851 AND 13858 WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 13718, consistlny of 232 lots, submitted by M. J. Brock and Sons, Subdivider, located at the southwest corner of Banyan Street and Milliken Avenue, has been submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga by said Subdivider for appproval by said City as provided in the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the require ments of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and WHEREAS. to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has offered the Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City, together with good and sufficient Iaroveaent Security, and submits for approval said Final Nap offering for dedication for street and highway purposes the streets delineated thereon. NON. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOWA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute sane on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to fury and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. Thot the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. 57 RESOLUTION MO. (_ a A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO a CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO A LANDSCAPEAIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT FOR TRACT MOS. 13748, 13857 AND 13858 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has ereviously forced a special maintenance district pursuant to the teras of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19720, being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance Dlstrfct'); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the pro perty described on Exhibit 'A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory propposed to be annexed to the Maintenance Dtstrict have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of an Engineers "Report". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bogy hereby orders the annexation of the pDroper as shown in Exhibit "A" and the work program areas as described in Exhibit 'B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. incEuTl gibe evy oflalitassessments. shall bth plicablecto ttherterritory annexed hereunder. EMIBIT 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 Banyan SI Lots 5861 Lot A, Tra< Lot A. Lot 32 Lot 33, Tract interior Street 1......,. klAken Ave Parkway: Wken Ave Median Banyan Sl Parkway Lot A. lots 32 6 33 Trod 13748• Lot A. Traci 13857• Lcts9.11 TmcI I3857- Lots 58 61, Tract 13858: 'POA' Y^ CIW OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c COUNTY OF ux BERNARDIN0 STATE Of CALITORNIA V, N Ave. Parkway 1, Tract 13857 Ave. Median Tract I89 19920 s 1. 24,089 s t..� 24,224 s 1. as • 13.292 sl. as 8,443 s 1. 14.66811. 134 1 S.14 &L 1.320 s 1. 10.42411. 85 2.760x1. 11.133af 101 'POA' Y^ CIW OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c COUNTY OF ux BERNARDIN0 STATE Of CALITORNIA V, N Ave. Parkway 1, Tract 13857 Ave. Median Tract E)MIBIT 'B' PROJECT NAME TRACTS 13748, 13857 AND 13858 NO. OF O.U. OR ACREAGE: 232 NO. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 232 STREET LIGHTING K41KTEMKE DISTRICT No. of to be Annexed 4 District No. ti J_ 1 --- 15 --- - -- 1 2 90 - -- -•- - -- -- a - a• 4 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Name Sq. ft. So. ft. Ea. 1 Milliken Ave. PkW. 19,920 24,089 89 Milliken Ave. Median 12,000 12,224 85 Banyan St. Pkwy. --- 13,292 85 Lot A, Lots 32 -33, Tract 13748 6,443 14,668 134 Lot A Tract 13857 - -- 1,524 .. Lots 9 -11, Tract 13657 1,320 10,424 85 Lots 58-61, Tract 13858 2,760 11,133 101 Interior Streets - —_ 523 Total 47;m -7rW 1 A 7 5� x4.,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and and Street Lighting t Maintenance Dist ictn;osanleands2rfor Tract 13728, located on the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Hillside Road, submitted by Hillside /Sapphire Venture tECON 30ATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions theroannexation to 7L Landscape Mainttenan Maintenance subject District Hoot iand and Street Lightinordering Clerketonsign said agreement and to �cau a saldomaapito recorMdtyor and the City AHALYSIS/BACKGROUND Tract 13728, located on the northwest corner of Sapphire Street and Hillside Planning Co ®tssicn own NcvsetbPrt25, 1987,oforntheidivision of 20 acresdlntots4 lots. The Developer, Hillside /Sapphire Venture, 1s submitting n agreement and to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following anounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $713,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $356,000.00 itonmmtentation: S 4,100.00 Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary school districts and Cucamonga County Mater District. C.C. d R.'s have also been appproved by the City Attorney. The Consent and ,Waiver to Annexatla; form signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk a office. Resyei y submitted, �%, I _ RH(J LB:,IAA� --� �r r Attachments 9� I j�. s a ■ the RESOLUTION NO. 3 _ Yrr A RESOLUTION , OF•THE- CITY,COUMCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO, CUCAMONGA` CALIFORNIA; = APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREElENT, IIPROVENEWSECURITY.- AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT M0. -13728 .t,, • LiH the - Tentative Map of Tract No. 13728;' consisting of: 34tlots, lstde /Sapphfre venture, Subdivider„ located atlthe,narthwast re Street and Hillside,Road has been'submftted to the'City of by'soid Subdivider for apppproval by said City as providedain Map Act'of the•State'ofrCaiifornia, and in compliance with°the Ordinance No. 28xof said City; and G, to awetr•thC *uirerents established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Hipp of•atid Tract said Subdfvider has offered the, Improvement Agremntr submitted herawfth- for`approval and execution "by safd City, together with good and sufficient improvement Security, and submits for approval said Firral Hap offering for dedfcation•for street and highM purposes the streets delineated thereon. NOW, T1ERL -ORE, THE CITY COUNCIL 0'r THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: , 1. lhat said Improvement Agreement be and the same is approved and the Mwyor is authorized to execute sass on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to fort and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute the certificate thereon on behalf of said City. K, .y G� i 1 V RESOLUTION N0, b 8 — � 1 8 A R7.SOLUTIOW OF Th'E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHOIM,A, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITOFY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DI'7RICT NOS. 1 AND 2 FOR TRACT 13720 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously fetid a special maintenance district pursuant to the terns of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972', being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said special maintenance districts Known and destgnaled as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance District'); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the ' Landscoping and Lighting &t of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of properly within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District hsve filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice ani hearing cr filing of an Engineer's 'Report'. HOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the abo s recitals are all true and correct. SECTICH 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the proper es shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as described to Exhibit 'B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3. Thdt all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including ihRTvy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. q3 ASSESSMHNTIt DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2 CITY OF &WHO CUCAVONOA A COUNTY OF SAN B1rit2iA1tDWo N �, STATE 01 CAtVORNSA ` mae1T •e• PROJECT NAME TRACT 13728 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 34 lots N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 34 units STREET LIGHTING K41NTENANCE DISTRICT District No. No. of I.— to be Annexed 1 2 8 --_ --- --- i L4NDSCAPE MAINTEKWE DISTRICT Ofstrfct No. Street Nave Turf Ground Cover Trees So. ft. Sa. ft. Ea. I Sapphire Street 5,150 27 i DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT A= `F MMI October 19, 1988 City Council and City Manager Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer Linda Beek, Engineering Technician Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4 for Parcel Map 9897, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parkway, submitted by Lewis Development Co. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving Parcel Map 9897, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 4, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Parcel Map 9897, located on the southeast corner of Church Street and Terra Vista Parka~], in the Planned Community Office Park Development District, was approved by the Planning Commission on December 10, 1986, for the division of 14.93 acres into 1 parcel. The Developer, Lewis Development Co., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: . m�i ITI LOCATION PERFORW%K E LABOR A MATERIAL Elm Ave. Nest (Town Center S 90,000 $ 45,000 Dr. to Church St.) Tom Center Dr. (Haven Ave. 274,000 137,000 to Spruce Ave.) Terra Vista Pkwy Nest 103,000 51,500 (Tom Center Dr. to Church St.) MPSO Line 1 -3 144,000 72,000 Terra Vista Tc%m Center to Terra Vista Business Park Church St. (Terra Vista Pkwy. 407,600 7.03,800 Nest to Elm Ave.) 91, - e.Y'i �.H� ±�f` -�.w. fib^:• �.tn. - °:u CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT,t: PM 9897 Lewis Development Co. October 19, 1988 Page Two Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval, has been received froo the County Water Oistrict.__C:C. 8 R.'s have also been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation farm signed by the Developer is on file in the City Clerk's office. Respq¢kfgfi9� submitted, R161: Ldy Attachments r ?Y q7 tee- r . i F �i RESOLUTION NO. $ 8 - &' 9 A RESOLUTION OF iNE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROYING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 9897, (TENTATIVE FARCEL NAP NO. 9897), INPROVFIENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY NHFREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 9897, s Development Co., and consisting of 1 parcel, locat of Church Street and Terra vista Parkway, being a Lot 1, as shown on Tract Number 2202, in the City of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map Maps, pages 67 and 67 1/2, to the offica of the Co Bernardino County and that section 1. Township 1 S Bernardino Meridian, as shown on Cucamonga Fruit L, as per Map Recorded in book 4 of Maps, Page 9, in Recorder said County, was approved by the Planning Rancho Cucamonga on December 10, 1986; and by Lewis southeast corner of a portion of Cucamongs, County In Book 34 of rder of San ge 7 Nest San ny's subdivision, e of the County on of the City of MnEREAS, Parcel Nap No. 98-7 is the final map of the division of land approved as shown on said Tentative Parcel Nap; and WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to approval of the Final Map, said subdivider submits for approval said Final Map offering for dedication for public use the streets delineated thereon. NOW. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement be and the saw is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Secuetty is accepted as good and sufftcient, subject to approval as to torn and content thereof by the City Attorney; and 3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Map delineating samo be approved and the City Clerk is authorized to execute thf certificate thereon on behalf of said City. �'4-r RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF'THE'CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,''CALIFORNIA;.ORDERING THE AINiEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MD. 4 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AMID 4 FOR PARCEL MAP 9897' WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; California, has Qreviously foremd a special Ju fntenance district pursuant-to . the terms -of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 19728; being Oivision IS, Part 2 of,the Streets and Highways Code of the -State of California, said special mafntenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 4, Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (hereinafter referred to as the •Maintenance 0lstrtct }); and - WV,EREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the 'Landscaping and Lig9hting Act of 1972• authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and Incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, all of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or filing of ar. Engineer's 'Report'. NON, THEREFGAE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAtONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation of the properTy -as shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as described in Exhibit 08' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,- - 1nc u ng a levy of all assessments, shall bo applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. i - 99 BXFIIBIS 'A' ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 4 STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 4 «sue 1 k6 �m CM Ot ROCHO CUCkWOMOA COUNTY Ol► BB,N MNARDINO N E)DIIBIT 830 PROJECT NAME PARCEL VIP 9897 NO. OF D.U. OR ACREAGE: 1 pcl: 14.93 acres N0. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 30 units No. of Le s to be Annexed District No. 14 •18 1 -'- h. 1 4 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Turf Ground Cover Trees District No. Street Nave Sq. ft. S4. ft. Ea. 4 136 n t WL ma§ , r CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONG/t. STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto-�— VBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13353, located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue, submitted by ALM Limited Partners RECOM MATIOM It is reccmmended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13353 were approved by the City Council on October 8, 1987, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $296,000 Labor and Material Bond: $148,000 The developer, ALH Limited Partners, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on safd improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Resppeect submitted, RHM•SMG :sd Attachments l0--)- 'ice - ill 7 „- `- RESOLUTION No. — �p wiv ,M A RESOLUTION OF THE'CITY- COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCFMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVENENT-AGREEMENT EMNSION AND IMPROVD ENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13353 WHEREAS, the City Couril'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,.` execuUd on October 19, i988, by•ALH Limited Partners as' developer; for the improvement of public right -of =way adjacent to the real property, specifically' described therein, and generally located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue:,and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agremnt and subject -to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13353; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agrement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby'approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. /o3 i b `i y. DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City llinageo FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13542 -1, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue at Canistel Avenue, submitteO by Grigsby Development MMOMPEMBATIOW It is recommended that the City Council idopt the attached resolu'cion, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGRDUWD off the�off- siteeiprovnementtssroforr Tract 13542 -1wer* approved by�sthacCity Council on September 17, 1987, in the following amounts. Street Hfilside Storm Drain Faithful Performance Bond: $866,000.07 $437,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $433,000.00 $218,500.00 The developer, Grigsby Development, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respe tfuu submitted, RHM'SMG:,i Attachments ley CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT im MMOMPEMBATIOW It is recommended that the City Council idopt the attached resolu'cion, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGRDUWD off the�off- siteeiprovnementtssroforr Tract 13542 -1wer* approved by�sthacCity Council on September 17, 1987, in the following amounts. Street Hfilside Storm Drain Faithful Performance Bond: $866,000.07 $437,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $433,000.00 $218,500.00 The developer, Grigsby Development, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respe tfuu submitted, RHM'SMG:,i Attachments ley r,{ !} ._•: - '°�„' -„'cc �.y..c^*. + -t i.. _ <_ ;.,4s w:#vd�- c..,.i: •' �.c..�ki ' NESOLURION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY C04NCIVOF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA;' CALIFORNIA ;•APPROVING'IMPROVEMEIIT AGREEMENT OMNSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13542 -1 V_ NNEREAS, the City Council of,,the City oCRancho;Cucamonga. a California, has for,its consfdaratfon an Improvement Agree wt Extension; s' executed on October;19;11988; by Grigsby' Development 'as- developer;.for -the Improvement of public.rtght- of -wqy :adjacent to the real "property;speciftcally described therein, and generally located on the south side of Nilsmi Avenue at Canistel Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13542 -1; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extenston and said 119 rovement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. �-r =.S /OS }' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA " STAFF REPORTT _ DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell R. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspectc`42_T SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13542 -2 Storm Drain, located on the south side of Wilson Avenue at Cantstel Avenue, submitted by Grigsby Development RECOMMEWOATIOM It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. AWALTSIS/BACKGROUNO Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements for Tract 13542 -2 Storm Drain, were approved by the City Council on September 17, 1987, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $131,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: f 65,500.00 The developer, Grigsby Development, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Resi bmitted, RNM.N$1G� Attachments A RESOLUTION No. 93 0-3 A REML6011 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMIDVGA,- CALIFORNIA, APPROVING,INPRoVDW AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13542-2 STORM DRAIN WHEREAS. the City Council of the,City of,Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for ift 'onsfderatfon an Improvement Agreement Extension, executed on October I- 1988.- by Grfgsby-Developwnt.as�developer.',for thil improvement of public r1ght-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the south side of Wilson Avenue at Canfstel Avnue; and WHEREAS, the Installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done In cOnJuXtfon with the development of said Tract 13542-2 Storm Drain; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension Is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga. California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of mo the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk w attest thereto. W: M". -- C1TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT' DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manger FROM: Russell H. Xaguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspec SUNECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 10414, locxted on Ridgeview Avanue north of Hillside Road, submitted by Greg Lundeen RECOONDDAT`ON It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Moyer Ind City Clerk.to sign said agreement. AHALYSISIBAC.:GROUHO Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract M414 were approved by the City Council an September 17, 1968, in the folluwing amounts. Faithful performance Wnd: $322,500 Labor and Material Bond: 5161,250 The developer, Greg Lundeen, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said Improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement E:taasian ale available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfrgsubmltt:d, h RHM: .s.� }� Attachments ■ i fi�Tr n a' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHORGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEw.dT AGkEENENr EXTENSION AND 1WROYEIENT SECURITY FOR 'rAACT 10413 1 ." WHEREAS, the City Council of the MY of Rancho-Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension t executed on October 19, 1988, by Greg Lundeem as developer, for the improvement of public right- of -%MY. adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally - located on Ridgeview Avenue, north of F Hillside Road; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement aNd'subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in ;y conjunction with the development of said Tract 10414; and << WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension 1s secured and acccspanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified w in said Improvemnt Agreement Extension. Rancho Cuccaammonga. Callifornia, thatOsaid Improvement Agrreeeeme not fExtension and said improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Hoar is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of Ike City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. l Y 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ip DATE: October 19, 1988 STAFF REPORT TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13057, located on the south side of Highland Avenue betwe.n Fairmont Avenue and Deer Creek, submitted Dy Fieldstone Company RECQlE"TION It is accepting t�subjectaagreeme City extension) andosecurity attached s dcautho resolution, ithe Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security tc guarantee the construction of the oft -site improvments for Tract 13057 were approved by the City Council on October 8, 1987, in the following amounts. Faithful Performance Bond: $460,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $230,000.00 The Nveloper, Fieldstone Cowpagy, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respe PtY submitted, RHl�G:jmb 1� Attachments //o J I RESOLUTION No, A RES06JTIoN 'OF i1'1k'CIT_Y,' COUNCIL OF-THE CM,cF,RANCHO CUCAMOm1A$ CALIFORNIA.•APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENS11 IN AND, IMPROVEMENT- SECURITY FOR T -7 AACT.1302 _P WHEREAS." the citV' Coi6cM of-im'City "f California. has.for its, Q -,Rancho Cucamonga,-� Consideration an loprovement.Agre*mnt,Exte�----,; executed on C�6 nsfon,, =ber'19,-'Igffi; by-Fieldstone Company- as developer,_for�the, improvement of publJc,rfqht_of_w&y'&djAcent�to , 'ealzpropeHighland the �jiffcally described therein and general IY-locat4d'on the Souith'side-of between Fairmont and DeWCreek: f6enue, and _�.Avenue WHEREAS, the Installation of such 'improvements, desckbedln' said Improvement Agreement and'subject to th&-terms thereof, Is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 130S7; and WHEREAS. said Improvement Agreement Extension Is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the Sam are hereby approved and the Mayor Is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamw.ga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. L__ r- i t t CITY OF RANCHO CUCABIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Yorks Inspectorz SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tracts 13022 East, 13022 Hest, 13022 Major Stress, located on the west side of Milliken Avenue between Fairmont Avenue and Victoria Park Lane, submitted by William Lyon roepbny � , 73 7- -- It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City clerk to sign said agreement. AHALYSIS/BACKGRDUWD Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements for Tracts 13022 East, 13022 West, 13022 Major Streets were approved by the City Council on June 19, 1986, in the following amounts. 13022 13022 East 13022 West Major Streets Faithful Performance Bond: $606,000.00 $420,000.00 $1,296,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $303,000.00 $210,000.00 $ 648,000.00 The developer, William Lyon Company, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Cierk's Office. Respec ull- "ubmitted, RHN:SIIG:- ----r Attachments RSOLUTION R0. A RESOLUTION OF -,7hE CIMCOUNCiL OF THE CITY,OF RANCHO N CUCAN ".'CALIFORNIA,-APPROYIh6 1WROVDEKr AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IIPROYDIM SECURITY FOR TRACTS 13022 FAST, 13022 NEST,;13022 MAJOR STREETS WHEREAS, the- Ci•ty,Council' of tha•C1ty,of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has far 1ts'constderatton an"laprovement „Agreement Extension executed or, October 19,-19M;-by by Nflllaw Lyon- Capagy,as developer;_for the iwprdvewnt of public right= of- way'adjacent -to- the ;real property specifically described therein, and generally located,on. the we3t stde.of- Milliken- Avenue between Fairmont Avenue and Yfetcria Park,, Cane; and Y *MREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done to conjunction with the development of said Tracts 13022 East, 13022 Nest, 13022 Major Streets; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreeaart Extension 1s securod and accompanied by good and sufficient-Improvement Security, which 1s identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreemont Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hertby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 113 N a r� 0 iTY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1908 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Inprovement Agreement and Improvement -tmrlty for Parcel Map 9350, located on the northeast come- of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, submitted by The W11;1r Lyon Company RECOHNENDATI06 It is recommended that ttti City Council adopt the attached resolutions accepting the subject agreement and security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROOMD Parcel Map 9350, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue, was approved by the City Council on April 16, 1988. The Developer, The William Lyon Company, is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construction of off -site ift)rovements, required an the Improvement Certificate of the subject rap, in the following amounts: Street Storm Drain Storm Drain Improvements Infrastructure Base Lire Infrastructure Faithful Performance Bond: $502,515.00 $616,155.00 $385,131.00 .abor and Material Bond: $251,2sa.00 $308,078.00 6:42,566.00. Copies of the agreement and security are available in the City Clerk's Office. A letter of approval has been received from Cucamonga County Water District. Respecjf07y submitted, Attachments s RESOLUTION NO. <R S — G 2 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE IMPROVENENT AGREEIENT AND IMPP.OVElENT SECURITY,FOR PARCEL MAP 9350 WHEREAS, Parcel Nap No. 9350, submitteA by The William Lyon Company, was approved by the City Council of the City of Rancho C.,,C& oga on March 15, 1980; and WHEREAS, to meet the repuirements,established on thefIwprovement Certificate of the final map of said City, have now been met by entry into an Improvement Agreement'Quarantmed by acceptable Improvement Security by The Lyon Company as developer. NOW, THEREFORE „BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, that said Improvement Agreement and said Improvement Security submitted by said developer be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorised to sign said Improvement Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest. F}} T- 1° z K a CITY OF RANCHO CI1CA3tONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 MJG TO: City Council and City Mansger FROM: Russell II. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Linda Beek, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security, for Tract 10210, located on the north side of Almond Avenue, west of Sapphire Street, submitted by Nordic Development Company, a General Partner of Skyline I, Ltd. and release of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security accepted by City Council an September 4, 1985, submitted by Forecast Mortgage Company RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting the subject agreement and security, and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement and to release the agreement and security accepted by City Council on September 4, 1985. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Tract 10210, located on the north side of Almond Avenue, west of Sapphire Street, was approved by the City Council on September 4, 1985. The Developer, Nordic Development Company a General Partner of Skyline I, Ltd., is submitting an agreement and security to guarantee the construc' on of the off -site improvements in the following amounts: Tract 10210 Faithful Performance Bond: $557,700.00 Labor and Material Bond: $278,850.00 The above mentioned security replaces the security September 4, 1985, from Forecast iortpage. C security are available In the City Clerk s Office. Respectfuliy submitted, RNMtLB•JAA:Jddr" Attachments Almond Interce t anne $587,400.00 $293,700.00 accepted by City Council on opies of the agreement and it RESOLUTION NO. s p 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA. 'APPROVING INPRDYEMENT AGREEMENT, ANO,INPROYEIENT SECURiTY'FOR- TRACT`NOj 10210 AND RELEASING THE- IMPROYE)ENT AGREEMENT ik SECURITY PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED LL• WHEREAS, Tract No., 10210. located on the north side oP_Alswnd Avenue, west of Sapphire Street was upproved by City Council on September4, 1985; and ie _ t WHEREAS, Nordic Development Company, a General Partner of Skyllrie'I, Ltd.. has offered the Iaprovement.Agreemant submitted herewith for approval and execution by said City.,together with good fficlent Improvement Securt Security. I mp rovement ,Agreemnt.and,Improvement Security. replaces Improvement Agreeawnt and Improvement Security accepted at the City Council i' meeting of September 4. 1985. t- , NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANDNOA, * HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: *' 1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the some 1s approved and the Nyyor is authortzed to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to fora and content thereof by the City Attorney; and i 3. That the Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security accepted at the City Council meeting of September 4, 1985 is hereby released. r, /17 x •.x' ��.:�•_ � ` -'y "i�..i �-". .° yx.:;?'r:'?:' '` - -' :`�'r -- :jar Q 0 J J ' •t t,, �I a - ICO vP • �� i ,. '� • �• +• � fit$ S _`� i �''��•d i l�� • � tai lS / ^, i i• i ��•t - • P t wl1.� n• { i x [ o \u0 �Na o rAPP"l FEE _ STREET ZDe .i Y r; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA r, "- 5 STAFF REPORT -• V DATE: October 19, 1988 zW-7G TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector SUBJECT: Release Faithful Performance Bond and accept reduced bond to replace original for Tract 12642, 12935 -44 Major Streets, located on the east side of Milliken Avnue north of Highland Avenue, submitted by Kaufman and Broad RECONNEWATIOM It 1: recommended that City Council release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $2,076,000.00 and accept a bond to replace it in the amount of $207,600.00 for Tract 12642, 12935 -44 Major Streets. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The required street improvements for Tract 12642, 12935 -44 major streets have been completed. However, the green belt areas, which are bonted separately, are not acceptable at this Liss. Reconstruction of some of the drsfns may be necessrry, which will affect the completed Improvements. Therefore, It 1s recommended that City Council not accept the improvements at this time, accept a new bond in the amount of $207,600.00 and release the original bond in the Faaithful of PerforrmanceO Bond andceitedsufficient the boto col er many effect improvementts disturbed until the improvements are accepted by Council. Developer: Kaufman and Broad 11601 Wilshire Blvd., 11th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90325 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $2,076,000.00 Accept: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ 207,600.00 Respec utlylsubmftted, RffM:SMG: fro ■ w : e. - ..'_J; °.�;pt,,.. ±:- ±y� >:.ki - :-mow a..... _ - . -. -� -y w= -• y _ CITY OF R ANCHO CUCAMONGA �+ STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 &-& TO: City Council and City Manager WN FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto -- SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 12621 have been completed in an acceptable manner and it is recommended that City Council accept said ta9roveaants accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of 316,900, aut�ertze the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize to City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $169,000. Background /Analysts Tract 12621 - located on the south side of Arrow Highway, between Madrone Avenue and Baker Avenue DEVELOPER: Macleod Development 2 North Lakb Avenue, Suite 670 Pasadena, CA 91101 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 3 16,900 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $169,000 Respectful ubmltted, R)DI:SMGtsd- Attachment ini �n r RESOLUTION 110. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO FOR TRACT 12621F�IAA�R ZING THEEFILINGCOF A NOOrCE OF COMPLETION FOR ME WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12621 have been co. -nleted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. hereby resolves,i that the work is herebylacceptedCanndd the Rancho ity Engineer Is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. t RECOMMENDATION: The required street imprcwcmants for OR 8I -01 have been completed in an accept -ble manner, and it is recommended that City Council ,accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance bond in the amount of $22,000. Background /Analysis OR 81 -01 - located on the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and Maple Place DEVELOPER: Davis Development 1400 Bristol Street North Newport Beach, CA 92660 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $22,000 Reesspectf submitted, J RHM. Attachment i as L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1980 TO: City Courr.fl and City Manage FROM: Russell P. Maguire, City Engineer BT: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecle SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion RECOMMENDATION: The required street imprcwcmants for OR 8I -01 have been completed in an accept -ble manner, and it is recommended that City Council ,accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance bond in the amount of $22,000. Background /Analysis OR 81 -01 - located on the northeast corner of Arrow Highway and Maple Place DEVELOPER: Davis Development 1400 Bristol Street North Newport Beach, CA 92660 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $22,000 Reesspectf submitted, J RHM. Attachment i as L - `�•� rv• 4 _ �� a —♦�i �'Y'YrR. .Y.-.i . .j ,...t' --�..y- .�:R.�Itj,-3.: ;nrpt,.�S �i,.•- � .. r, ijy. •" CIS RESOLUTION NO. 47- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO' THE PUBLIC IMPROYEKEHTS + + %' CUCAMDNGA, ACCEPTING CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF ?� FOR DR 81 =01 +AND COMPLETION FOR-ME'NORK r DR 87 -01 have of thelCitymEngineer; and been completed to the satisfaction xNEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. No", THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga accepted and,the City Engineer is hereby resolves, that the work is hereby file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of authorized to sign and San Bernardino County., / a-3 M 1. 1 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $9,590.00 ResPecttfuulllY submitted, Attachment C J i'K •: l.t } X .gyp i i S' K": CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 T0: City Council and City tanager FROM: Russeil,H. Maguire, City Engineer BV: Steve N. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector �• SUBJECT: Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion h� Y. RECONEIDATSOM: 1, • The required street improvements for 7740 East Avenue have been completed said improveeents, authorizeicthe Cirecommended to file accept y Completion and authorize the City ClerL to release Performance Bond in the amount of $9,500.00. an3 tl the Faithful Y Background /Analysis 7740 East Avenue DEVELOPER: Wayland Gillespie 17131 Gale Avenue Industry, CA 91745 Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $9,590.00 ResPecttfuulllY submitted, Attachment C J i'K •: l.t } Ail ^:rKl'a: tt _ .�• ,. . i...,.,�.y_ Q� 1 RESOLUTION N0. D (4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFVRANCHO P CUCfXNGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 7740 EAST AVENUE AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK J WHEREAS the construction of public improvements for 7740 East Avenue w: have been comp i to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREA- Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. F, N NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucaoongm, hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is a authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. r 0 w' a — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager PROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto SUBJECT: Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 12922 located on the north side of Highland Avenuo east of Haven Avenue REC0M EWTION: It iL recomended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. 3ackground /Analysis The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, Release: Developer: LBI Development 123 North Post Oak Lane, 1400 Houston, TX 77024 Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $10,000.00 Resppeectf 11 baitted, RFM:SlIG:,imb�— /a!a a I cuc�.MC�cn c�z SfT IV bR'T 19.1998na9er \ If TO M tobs Pte' aStYlCcuncil enuire�fitY En9MOrks 1nsReo 62 -5 locates at the .101 Stever m f1i intennn 5t5 Street end xe se Pveoue to so t er of he rAv Cierk 50R3EG1 north" council eutorise WOW t1 the Ci a SO4s a �! street �coow- taeno ce Gunrente a s ease wocK.nSI" is ! W er%Q4 ia1s a 1 geck9roundlPn°1Ye yeyee defeats in struction OomPenY �quirea in f 6 IDO p *jenue. 1091130 the �vewents Pal o Cuc� e. its OEyELOPER' Q03'5ct�ie n9 �! 9ona t5trletl 542.530.E please. µeiateoence Warn° sub°itte a. VLg sReotfui)d n a? CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: kjssell H. Maguire, City Engineer BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works lnspectmE T SUBJECT, Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 9619 located at the northwest corner of Carnelian Street and Jasper Street RECCNKMTIOII: It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds. Background/Analysis The required one year maintenance eriod has ended and the street improvements remaj- Oree from defects fn materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: Plaza Builders 3187 A Airway Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $81,350.00 Respectfpy submitted, 'p CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT C .�a i�+ ia ss 'ts DATBt October 10, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager 809JBCft Administration Department geora atica It is recommended that the City Council authorize tba City Manager to establish the classification of Administrative Aide at a salary range of $1,888 - $2,423 (steps 340 -390). Information dark Lorimar's resignation leaves the City Manager's office vith yet another opportunity for reorganization. After Mark leaves, the City Manager's support staff vill include an Administrative Assistant, an Advinis trative Analyst and an admimistrative Intern. Since both Duane Baker and Diaae O'Neal have been working in the City Manager's office for only three months, it vould not be appropriate to promote either into the Senior Administrative Assistant's position. gather, I find it more appropriate to continue Duane and Diane in their present positions sad recruit sa additional full -time Administrative person in a staff support role. I am recommending that the City Council authorize an Administrative Aide position which vould be considered the first step in the City's professional administrative track. A new Administrative Aide would attend to basic details such as providing support in legislative activities, responding to citizen complaints, and research and drafting reports on a variety of projects and issues. In addition, the Administrative Aide vould be assigned as support staff to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation. 14 �a ., 7 r I. 4 r r' w a, r; Administrative Department Reorganization October 10, 1988 Page Two The oalsry range for the Administrative Aide would be set at $1,808 — $2,423, 15% below that of the Administrative Analyst and 302 below that of the Administrative Assistant. The administrative series would be set as follwas Administrative Assistant Administrative Analyst Administrative Aide Minimum Step $2,547 (400) 2,193 (370) 1,888 (340) Control Maximum Point Step $3,109 (440) $3,268 (450) 2,677 (410) 2,814 (420) 2,305 (380) 2,423 (390) Like both the Administrative Assistant and Administrative Analyst., the Aide would be classified as a Supervisory /Professicoal employee and be entitled to added management benefits (up to 40 hours management leave, $5,000 additional life insursoce, 2% referred compensation. With the City Council's concurrence, I would like to re +tructure the City Manager's office staff and assign the following task& to the Administrative Assistant, Administrative Analyst and Administrative Aide. Responsibilities of Administrative Assistant a Prioritise mail and coordincto lettcra of response for Mayor and City Council. • Act as primary staff to the Public Safety Commission (prepare agendas and coordinate Commission business). a Respond to City Council and Commission requests for service. • Coordinate a resolution to the Labor Camp Issue. • Administa. the City's Animal Contra Services Contract and handle related services as necessary. + Coordinate the reorganization of the City's subsidiary fire district. • Administer the City's Fireworks Ordinance and coordinate fireworks sales activities. • Coordinate specific employee training programs. • Monitor the City's contract with County Sheriff. • Coordinate the preparation of the City's Coals and Objectives and Value Statement. • Monitor the City's Administration Department budget. • Prepare proclamations and coordinate presentation of the City Council. a Prepare articles and information for the "Grapevine" and other information materials. • Provide staff support to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Ywndation on a limited, as needed basis. Responsibilities for Administrative Analyst Provide primary staff support to the Advisory Commission (prepare agenda& and coordinate Commission business). / ,)9,q- Administrative Department Reorganisation October 10, 1988 Page Torea * Administer all cable televiaion franchise agreements. * Administer all refuse collection franchise agreements and coordinate refuse activities. * Coordinate recycling activities. * Admmieister the City's Mobile Rome Park Accord Agreement and coor.'inete all mobile home activities. * Coordinate the N*- Smoking Ordinaace. * Coordinate activities perteining to the Community Survey. * Coo rdinato public access television activities. * Coordinate the City's semi - annual Clean Swap Programs. * Provide support to the City's Sesquicentennial Celebration. * Coordinate preparations to Student Government Day. * Provide staff support to Omnitrans. * Provide staff support to SANSAG * Provide staff support to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation an a limited, as needed basis. Resnonaib.lities for Administrative Aide * Provide staff support to City's legislative activities and prepare correspondence. * Provide staff support tc a variety of special projects. * Provide staff support to the Rancho Cucamnnga Community Foundation. The tbree- tiered administrative structure will allow for flexibility and future growth of responsibility for our staff. The young team will have a great opportunity to learn and grow within the department. 1 will also have the option to alter job tasks appropriately among the three positions. The Administrative Aide job description is attached for your reference. Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. I.HNt j is attacbment 0509.02/88 -115 2 /D96 %. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMA AD41MISTRATIVE AIDE DEFINITION This is a full .tick entry level professional administrative staff position j assisting in the preparation of reports, special analyses and the support of ongoing programs. lt- Under general supervision, the administrative aide is responsible for *l ' providing assistance in carrying out special projects, supervising or coordinating specific assigned,-projects and programs and attending to ad;ainistrat vs details. Work includes a wide variety of tasks designed to y; relieve higher level management staff of details pertaining' to specific % t,dp may also responsibility valopmentimple entation and evaationof city progras Works reviewed by observation, conference and analysis of reports. .L. SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED Receives supervision from hir r level management staff. No supervision exercised. EXAMPLES OF DUTIES - Duties may include, but are not limited to, the 0 ow ng: Develops, implements and evaluates specific programs as assigned. Confers with staff concerning operational problems and issues requiring procedural or policy review. Conducts research, procedural and administrative work or studies; prepares reports containing proposed or recommended solutions or courses of action. Represents management staff at meetings as necessary. Performs related work as assigned. QUALIFICATIONS Knowledge of: Principles and practices of organization review and analysis, and public administration. Research techniques, sources and availability of information, and woods of report presentation. /29C-1 i Rancho Cucamonga' r� 44' Adeleistrati ve' Ai de = Abiltb to i' Design, gn, conduct, and analyze research findings. Communicate effectively, both orally and in writing, p Establish and, maintain effective workiop relationships with other employees and the public. i } Implement and follow through on tasks relating to assigned t�; projects. Experience and Education Any combination equivalent to experience and education that could likely t provide the required knowledge and abilities would be qualifying. A typical way to obtain the knowlwdge and abilities would be: Experience r One year of increasingly responsible adninistrative experience to local goverment. Education: v a Bachelor's degree in Public or Business Adolnistration or related field. i 4'' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: October 12, 29ES TO: LAUREN WASSERMAN, CITY MANAGER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONrIA FROM: EUGENE GILMORE, CAPTAIN RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHERIFF`S STATION SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR POSITION UPGRADE TRAFFIC SERGEANT To TRAFFIC LIEUTENANT The Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station would like to upgrade the Traffic Sergeant -a positiop to that of a Traffic Lieutenant. The cost for this upgrade for the remainder of fiscal year 88/89, assuming the position was filled Nov�amber let, would be $5,450.69. Additionally, the Lieutenant, if approved, would be equipped with an unmarked Sheriff's vehicle, cost for tho unit would be $2,786 for the remainder of this fiscal year. The total cost of a Lieutenant with a unit for the remainder of this fiscal year is $8,236.69. A top step Lieutenant receiving 8% Post Incentive salary and benefits costs $77,320 for a full year. Top step Sergeant with the 8% Post Incentive salary and benefits costs $67,976. RECOMnegDATION The Traffic Division of the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station, currently consists of two Sergeants, one Senior Deputy investigator, seven Deputy II's assigned to traffic Tara, and four Deputy 11's assigned to motorcycle patrol. The proposal is to upgrade one of the Traffic Sergeant pooitlons t0 that of Traffic Lieutenant. In 1986 the Traffic Division of the Rancho Cucamonga Station wrote 12,060 traffic citations. In 1987, that same division wrote 17,432 citations. During the first nine months of 1988, the Traffic Division has already written 15,463 citations. Thic is only one indicator of the increased workload being placed on the division. in addition to citations, the Traffic Division is increasingly being called on to perform special enforcement in problem traffic areas of the city. As the city continues to grow, it is anticipated that the number of these areas will increase. 130 '4 r.� M'. Page Two t� October 11,11988_ _ UPGRADE POSrTION /SLRGLANT- LIEUTENANT It is felt that the,addition of a Traffic Lieutenan` will enable the Traffic „Diviaidh.to more_aidequately.planRtraffic enforcement strategles_ and manage traffic enforcement efforts. •+ - Staff feels that"the_ addition of a Traffic Lieutenant will allow for full ti” 'ianagament, efforts on the part of the Traffic Lieutenant ,:n4 allow_tha Sergeant to devote more time to functional 'supervision of traffic personnel. Submi d for your consideration. c sla a 4 car �i � .ate M r ' y* b �c 9 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANO?ICA MEMORANDUM DATE$ October 12, 1988 TO: LlUIREN gASBERRhN, CITY MANAGER � CITY OP A4NCH0 CUCAEONOA PROM EUGMM OIWiORE, CAPTAIN RANCRO CUCANONr,A SHERIFF'S STATION SUBJECTS REQUEST FUR POSITION UpGRADE The Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station would like to propose that in the Records Division or.e Station Clark Position be upgraded to a Clerk IV /euperviaor. Cost of *.hie upgrade for' fiscal year 88189 would be $879.x)0, this iucludee ralary and all benefits. I RECORRP,NpATION The Records Division of the Rancho Cucamonga Sheriffs Station currently consists of 9 clerical personnel. At the current time these personnel are rupervised by the Administrative Sergeant. The Administrative Sergeant's duties are surh that he can not provide full time supervision to the clerical staff. Station Clerk poe3ti t+;r Cr „die : $ o the on to a Clerk i'• ,.porvisor would allow for functional supervision of the it, I Records Division or. a full time basis. A top step t, IVs salary and benefits equate to $29,074 per yes , cop step aryand Clerk'a salary and benefits equate -o $27,7s6 per year, total coat of this upgrade for a Eull fiscal year would be $1,318.OS. Strff feels that the benefits of having a full time .upurviser in the Records Di"Gion, justify this position upgrade. submitted for your consido ration. /3a M W5%A ti2�lJ.r a t yCi� .c , rr :e r CITY OF RANC1i0 C[JCAMONGA EM ANb UM a DATE: October 12, vd -* TO: a ;i._.. rT -' - - LAURENjMl18SERMANr' CITY 7V -NAGER r . C1, OJ IMNCBO CU, CITY ` PROMt EUGENE GILMORE, CAPTAIN nY RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEERIFrts STATION SUBJECTt REQUEST FOR CITIZEN PATROL VEEICrE - The Rancho Cucamonga Citiren•datro7 donations,towerds the purchase of received $5,000 in $1,000 waa donated b citizen-,Patrol vehicle. Lewie Building Associationy 8omee .n8 $4,000 by'the - Estimated cost_ of a nee vehicle fir the rtt"s Patrol appromimately $11,000. This est4,,19 to dasednon an 1989is ¢ "s Ford Tempo, and is a,fleet price , the cit d request that for theycitisen,stpa : iolitional y fund this vehicle SubVed your cLnsidoration. ra t/ t E ,.,. 33 X s i� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Date: October 19, 1988 � To: City Council and City Manager From: Russell H. Mag.:ire, City Engineer By: Richard R. Cote, Associate Civil Engineer Subject: Proposed Intention to Construct the Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain between Utica Street and Red Oak Avenue within Assessment District 32 -1 and the calling for bids for said storm drain construction. RECMiJMTION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolutions for A) Proposed Intention to Construct tie Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain and B) The Calling for Bids for Construction of said Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain, between Utica Street and Red Oak Avenue within Assessment District 82 -1. BACKGROUND /MALYSIS• This report presents the Engineering Staff's intent and recommendation for connstructinn of additional storm drain facilities within Assessment District (AD) 82 -1, to be funded from remaining assessment revenue. AD 82 -1 is bordered by the following approximate boundaries: Arrow Route on the north, Deer Creek Channel on the west, Fourth Street on the south 'and Rochester Avenue on the east. The proposed storm drain facilities will sLpplemrent and provide consistency with the now existing originally master CpTanned facilities. Said caster planned facilities were designed for Q100 year flows to be contained within the right -of -way end X25 year flows to be carried in storm drains. The first additional facility to be addressed is tha Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain between Utica Street and Red Oak Avenue. It is proposed to construct a 39' storm drain in Jersey Boulevard in order to mitigate potential Q100 year flows which are presently projected to flow beyond the right -of -way. This stretch of Jersey Boulevard has fully developeo adjacent properties. The proposed storm drain will interconnect an active storm drain pipe and inlet facilities at Jersey Boulevard and Utica Street with a presently existing inactive storm drain pipe and inlet facilities at Jersey Boulevard and Red Oak Avenue. ��7 M' %'. . <K: ».I,�tc'C hY t es�,n�a _ �. '➢,9 -v.- iP "x'_� s CCSR October r19 1988evard Storm Drain Page 2 Approval of the above mentioned Resolutions are administrative activities required to implement expenditures of the remaining AD 82 -1 revenues for the proposed construction'of the Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain. Respec submitted, 6: :pam Attachment :v WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously initiated proceedings and not a public hearing pursuant to the terms and provisions of the -Municipal Improvement Act of 1913', being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for a assessment district designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA) (hereinafter referred to as the -Asses sment District-)I and, WHEREAS, at this time it appears to thin legislative body that certain changes and modifications are necessary, and that, purnuant to the provisions of Section 10353 of said Streets and Highways Coda, it Is necessary that this legislative boJy adopt a Resolution briefly describing the proposed changes and giving notice of a Lima and place for a public hearing where parsons may appear and show cause why said changes should not be ordered) anal, •'• WHEREAS, no as samente will be increased by reason of the proposed changes and wficiatlons. NON, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS rOLLOWSI SECTION 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2 That the public Interest, convenience and necessity requires, and it is the intention of this legislative body, to order cortain changes and modifications in the proceedings and the works of imprcvamont for this Assessment District described as follower The construction and installation of additional storm drain facilities and appurtenances to serve all proportion within the boundaries of the special Assessment District. SECTION 3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1908, AT THE HOUR OF 7130 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING IHE LIONS PARR COMMUNITY CENTER IACATED AT 9161 BASE LINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED FOR HEARING ANY PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS AS PROPOSED TO BE MADE BY IHIS RESOLUTION. ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY APPEAR BEFOR3 THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS SHOULD NOT BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS RESOLUTION ANY OBJECTIONS MUST BE IN WRITINO AND PILED WITH THE ClT! CLERK By ANY INTERESTED PERSON AT ANY TIME NOT LATEP THAN Tt= "'we +aT FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. .6st'1N The City Clark is hereby directed to certify to tr)e adoption of this Resolution and cause a copy to be published ants, n999(( Iaso than tin (10) days prior to the Bete sot for the Public Haar. Said pub). cation shall be in the DAILY REPORT, a newspaper selgnatodCQgr legal C publications under these pioceedinga IIWVI -L_7ti W -RESOLUTION NO. S {- RESOLVTIOft O[ -THE CITY COUNCIL Ol THE ,,. CISY Ol AIWCNO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER CERSAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS IN i THE WORE IN A SPECIAL ASSESS(ENT F . DISTRICT AND 66TTIN0 PUBLIC HEAitING WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY or RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has previously initiated proceedings and not a public hearing pursuant to the terms and provisions of the -Municipal Improvement Act of 1913', being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for a assessment district designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 82 -1 (6TH STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA) (hereinafter referred to as the -Asses sment District-)I and, WHEREAS, at this time it appears to thin legislative body that certain changes and modifications are necessary, and that, purnuant to the provisions of Section 10353 of said Streets and Highways Coda, it Is necessary that this legislative boJy adopt a Resolution briefly describing the proposed changes and giving notice of a Lima and place for a public hearing where parsons may appear and show cause why said changes should not be ordered) anal, •'• WHEREAS, no as samente will be increased by reason of the proposed changes and wficiatlons. NON, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS rOLLOWSI SECTION 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct SECTION 2 That the public Interest, convenience and necessity requires, and it is the intention of this legislative body, to order cortain changes and modifications in the proceedings and the works of imprcvamont for this Assessment District described as follower The construction and installation of additional storm drain facilities and appurtenances to serve all proportion within the boundaries of the special Assessment District. SECTION 3 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1908, AT THE HOUR OF 7130 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY, BEING IHE LIONS PARR COMMUNITY CENTER IACATED AT 9161 BASE LINE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED FOR HEARING ANY PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS AS PROPOSED TO BE MADE BY IHIS RESOLUTION. ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY APPEAR BEFOR3 THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS SHOULD NOT BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS RESOLUTION ANY OBJECTIONS MUST BE IN WRITINO AND PILED WITH THE ClT! CLERK By ANY INTERESTED PERSON AT ANY TIME NOT LATEP THAN Tt= "'we +aT FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. .6st'1N The City Clark is hereby directed to certify to tr)e adoption of this Resolution and cause a copy to be published ants, n999(( Iaso than tin (10) days prior to the Bete sot for the Public Haar. Said pub). cation shall be in the DAILY REPORT, a newspaper selgnatodCQgr legal C publications under these pioceedinga IIWVI -L_7ti W N,wa SECTION 5. Said Changes' and modifications do not propose any increase !n �'•= aaaeeementi in the Aasessnent District. SECTION 6. Theo* cAnr:goo and'modiflcatione ere hereby ordered'pursuant to the provi- " alone Of Chapter 4.S of 'Division 13 of the Streets and Highways ,Ccde,of the State of CallfO"La. the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913•. SECTION 7 Any changes made pursuant f r d Chapter Nall not release or discharge the sureties under any »n•tv as required under this Division, if applicable�n',` + - "APPROVED endO�PTED tYh .l f , 1988. ATTEST, CITY CLERK CI -MTATV _. _._.. MAYOR --C=c.��RA.4CHO CUCAMONGA cAa ratty_._.,, )37 ::. RESOLUTION NO. 5 -0 RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY,OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REPEAENCINO PREVAILING WAGE SCALE AND ]DIRECTING CALL FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS L WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, has hereto- fore instituted proceedings for changes and modifications to the works of Improve- ment antler the provisions of the -Municipal Improvement Act of 1913•, :/sing Division 32 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the Construction of certain public worka of improvement in a spacial asaessmont district known and designated as ASSEsSHENT DISTRICT NO. 92 -1 referred to as the (STN STREET INDUSTRIAL AREA) (hereinafter "Aaesaamsnt District•(; and, i WHEREAS, at this time there have been submitted for final review the plans and specl- flcationa for the changes and modifications to the works of Improvement for the Assessment District; and, WHEREAS, it in the intention of the legislative body to also call for sealed Proposals or bids for the dolr.g of said chang*s and co2iflcations to the work and Improvements in said Assessment Dlstrlet; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary to determine the pray.Lling rat* of rages for the various classifications of workman required in the performance of said work. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS pOLLOWSr SECTION 1 That the above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2 That the plans and spec.fications _or the changes and modifications to the works of improvement in the Assessment District are hereby approved and authorized for bidding SECTION 3 That it Is hereby determined and ascertained that the general proveLling rate of per diem wages in the locality in which said work described is to be performed in the matter of the construction of certain public works of Improv oeent, together with appurtenances, in the Assessment District, under the provisions of the *Municipal Improvement Act of 1913•, being Division 12 of the Streets and Hl�uw&ye Code of the State r CallCOrrla, for each craft or type of work and m,,a or mechanic needed to execute the contract, also the general prevailing rate for legal holiday and over- time work of each Craft or type of workmen or mechanic, is in accordance with the schedule obtained from the Director of Industrial Relations, pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, and reference is hereby made to copies thereof on file with the transcript of theme proceedings, which said copies are available to any interacted party upon request Further a Copy shall be posted ct each job site during the course of construction. SECTION 4 That the proposals or bids shall be opened and examined At a public (eating so called; and said results of the bidding shall be reported at the next regular meeting of this legislative the bide body otter the opening of 138 •.15. ` -3 t I SECTION S. That theMt�imi and eonditions for bidding on the works of �leprov'am�ot� foil _ this AswsamenY,Dietriet ere as eat forth in full in the B1d�Documente+an' the epecifleationa`aa previously_apProved. ;Reference is hsreby!maEe ;to aaid.eid Document: heretofore approved; and, idenllfiad "ae.TNOfICE'INVIMNQ SEALED PROPOSALS, ASSESSMENT D36SAIcf NO. 92 _1 , AREA) - BID NO. 2'. For all PD- tirulars an' Co bidding _-.the Notice Inviting 80aled Proposals &Love referenced and all incorporate C documents - end laws, including but not limited 'to the 'Municipal Improvement Act of 1933•, shall control. SECTION 6. That it is Asreby determined that in the event the contractor, contract- ing Owners Included, dose not complete the work within the time limit specified in the contract or within the time limit as shall be autho- riaed, the contractor or contracting Owners, as the caw may be, shall Pay as liquidated damages the amount or amounts as set forth in the speci- fications for the project, said amounts herein referenced and so incor- porated. That it is impractical to determine the actual damage which will be sustained by reason of ouch delay, bat that the stated mum is a reasonable amount for said liquidated damage: and is not being imposed as a penalty. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA MAYOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STATE OF CALIFORNIA �Tr 1988. V �"}-:Y +:L. P,-`' 4 `Y��.{;Y�^4'W• -'r- - 'A" ,TY..Y. .n� -... ..�a..e✓+l =ro *+^; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �r STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1998 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer 4 BY: Joe Stofa, Jr., Associate Civil Engineer C' SUBJECT: SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 16 1988 - AN APPEAL OF THE - appeal o ve con tons o appreva andtinfng to utility undergrounding, street dedications and improvements, emergenCy access and store drain facilities required by the Planning Commission for a residential subdivision of 18 single family lots on 12.88 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (1 -2 dwelling units per acre), located west of Sapphire Street, is south of Almond Street (APN 1061- 091 -03) C xW '- REC(V@131DATIOM: Staff recommends that this item be set for a public hearing on the November 16, 1988 City Council agenda. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS Tentative Tract 13738 was approved by the Planning Commission on September 14, 1988. This action has been appealed to the City Council and as such requires that a public hearing be set. To alive for publication and mailing of Notices of the Hearing, a public hearing should be scheduled for the regular City Council meeting of November 16, 1988. Respectf submitted, Attachment i 11 me r "CIT_ Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Z DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council , s FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner i BY: Dan Coleman, Senior Planner $ SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 88- ' Various amendments -ilia Sign r nonce raga ng neon stgn,i and windrn signs. (To be continued to November 2, 1988) 1. REC"ENDATION: Staff recommends that this item be continued to IZ—vea—er-WrU allow the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors additional time to review the revised language. It. BACKGROUND: As directed by City Council at, the August 31st workshop, staff has met with Chamber of Commerce representatives to develop revised language that addresses both the Council's and the Chamber's concerns. Based upon staff's discussion with the Chamber, a revised draft amendment to the sign Ordinance was prepared and forwarded to the Chamber. Staff and the Chamber are requesting a continuance for additional time to review the revisions being forwarded to the City Council. Attached for your information is a copy of the latest draft as presented to the Chamber. Attachment .. r 111 t -C? La. =Ssr' ONLY ORDINANCE 110. 3,58 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 88 -010 AMENDINGFTITLLE.14POF THE RANCHO ORDINANCE CAMONGAAHElII1MEHT MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY REGULATIONS FOR ICON AM NINDON SIGNS ANP ADDING PROVISION FOR TEMPORARY SIGNS FOR CITY SPONSORED SPECIAL EVENTS follows: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as SECTION 1: Section 14.08.030 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as follows, n7 —w0rZs and graphics: including a en re area of not more than eight strai the extreme limits of the wr together with any material o of the display or used to dl structure against which it i. framework or bracing that is case of a bIo- sided, multi -s' computed as including the ma: any ground position at one t Area of sign" shall be computed by a single, continuous, rectilinear perfmnter lines, or a circle or an ellipse, enclosing g, representation, emblem, or other display, or forming an integral part of the background entiate the sign from the backdrop of aced, but not including any supporting arly incidental to the display itself. In the or three dimensional sign, the area shall be a sin;la display surface which is visible from WDIYIDUIL.I.L'1'rna qaN plCalf7) 10st AM c*&u � FerEav" DMMMAL LLTM 9M L Detarmining Sign Areas CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. RE: SIGN ORD. AMEND. 88 -01 Page 2 �. fO110ws: SECTION 2: Section 14.08.380 of Chapter 14.08 is amended to read as 14.08.030 Window sign. "Window slon" means a sign painted, attached, glued, or o erM se a xe a window or located within three feet of the interior side of the window or otherwise easily visf4le from the exterior of l� the building. follows: SECTION 3: Section 14.20.070 of Chapter 14.20 Is amended to read as siggn mater4820 n7excerTrimm m of —srg{ �S Neon as a following provisions: V A. Permitted only in the more intense commercial zones: r Caamnfty Commercial Regional Related Commercial Regional Commercial • B. Exposed tubing Is prohibited. Neon tubing shall be fully enclosed in a metal frame and covered with plexiglass. C. Wtthid shopping centers, neon signs clay be allowed only as part of a Uniform Sign Progra:o. D. Such signs shall be limited to business identification only, and may include graphic symbols. follows: SECTION 4: Section 14.20.071 is added to Chapter 14.20 to read as 14.20.071 Neon s1 ns - interior. Neon tubing may be permitted as a sign material or n er or w n cw ST, ns subject to the following provisions: A. Permitted In commercial zones only. B. No more than two neon window signs shall be permitted per business. C. Generic name messages shall not exceed two square feet. A combination of graphic symbols and generic names may be used; however, the total combined sign area shall not exceed four ;quare feet. D. Names shall be limited to generic messages, such as OPEN or PIZZA . No product advertising or business identification is allowed except in the form of a graphic symbol. `j3 •n CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE N0. RE: SIGN ORD. AMEND. 88-01 Page 3 follows; SECTION 5: Subsection Q is added to Section 14.16.010 to read as Q. Teaporary window signs shall be permitted for any business in a commercial zone, and for commercial type uses in industrial or office zones when approved as part of a Uniform Sign Program, subject to the following criteria: 1. Limited to temporary messages such as sales. No business identification is permitted. 2. Maximum sign area shall be up to 30 percent of the wtndow area, not to exceed 150 square feet. 3. The placement of the sign shall be located on the first floor only on multi -story buildings, and shall not exceed 20 feet in height above finished grade an one -story buildings. 4. No temporary window sign shall be displayed continuously for more than 30 days. S. Paper signs which advertise "weekly specials ", and similar signs which are rotated on a regular basis, shall have a fastening device for a more Permanent Took. Window signs affixed with tape are discouraged. follows: SECTION 6: Section 14.08.215 is added to Chapter 14.08 to read as 14.08.215 Neon sign. "Neon sign" means arty glass tube lighting in which a gas and p osp ors are used in combination to create a colored sign. follows: SECTION 7: Section 14.20.000 of Chapter 14.20 is amended to read as 14.20.080 Permitted si ns - Residentfal Zones. The following signs may be perm e n e res en a zones su ec o e provisions listed: (Chart remains unchanged) follows: SECTION 8: Section 14.20.100 of Chapter 14.2u is amended to read as following ls gnslmwyP5e pte1'xmd se nsn- Cormercirc andanfftoce c s_eslsubject to the provisions listed: (see revfbed chart attached) Y Clrf AE: Page 4 .F SECTION 9: Section 14.20.110 of Chapter 14.20 is: amended to read as follows: 14.20.110 Pernftted si ns - Industrial Zones. The,folloring signs may he pem n e r us r a zones su ec a provisions listed: (Chart remains unchanged) SECTION io: Section 14:24.090 is adf" i to Chapter 14.24 to read as 'follows: 14.24.090 Sign .color. Sign colors should he compatible with the building arch ec re. Within shopping centers, sign color should compliment the color scheme for the center: The use of garish or ilourescent colors is considered inappropriate. SECTION 11: This Council finds that this amendeent will not adversely a ec a environment and hereby issues a Negative Declaration. R y ors 34 w a ti rY ' :s rd :'h.mce.�s. .ry�wy..�•. • :a r4 �;i' �•s E� sj. Pis ��b9sYt�'�14ff 1HpY� • $93 l9 p�. i@ds ors I ��: 2 ga ;f a �9 89;a Ill.'s oil Y 3 1 E 9 Sill 39�, Y lit 12,1 �eg1 Aga s a a a a a a �y55 ya�� a s a 'a as s a 9�i y7 lB�iAL 8 ilia] 8 8 ■S �8 alai E z fin e� 9' $$�� l t • a a Sill tilt anti 8� s a IIjIlid _ a �t L• I 9 ilia) 1 '. 1 e$ sill gill g � yp j B $a B aa�l Ii M11 ega ao °e� $ sr $••2 �$8 3 edi$d ja a r i i I a as fit Ilk �Ga Y i lij a$ ds ] � li a F g f 8S sl9 T J /(-� 9 ` 'k.1 . .h?a ° i'F �• r.5. i'U�.L p'1.r'. _ n fur � _ � _ � •, 6& wffjjj�51 MUM �60�xlp r� JAMES F. BAILEY mawnwnncurt - October 13, 1988 r Vx b Mr. Jack Lam i �t-: Community DeVelOPment Director 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga '- , 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Ia. Rat General Plan Amendment No. 88 -04 . Dear Jack: ; Please consider this letter as our formal request to withdraw the 1 w above- mentioned General Plan Ame d- n went and rccompanying Victoria Community Plan Amendment 88 -07 1+� Vorl, truly yours, v S: LYON COMPANY i James P. Bailey JBB:nc cc: Mr. John Potter Hughes Investn,,enta 109 E3.70AK*Ax dAarn rnnagy Ceaf 94730 (7V) M2244 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIAONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: Lctober 19, 1988 TO: City Council and amity Manager FR(N: Brad BNler, City Planner BY: Al,n Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENEM PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 88- 03C - Ihzitex: A request to anz )nd the General Plan Land Use Map from Very Low density residential (1 -2 du /acre) to General Comaercial for 57,5+ acres of land located south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway. fhe City Council will eoosider other appropriate General Plan land use categories (Neighborhood Comeercial, and Office). AP!'s 226- 121 -08, 11, 12, and 225 - 112 -03. II. L ASSESSMENT AND ETI'd=A SPECIFIC PLAN ), 88 -05 - Unitex: A request to amend the :cific Plan Map from "VL" (Very Low density 1 -2 du /acre) to "GC" (General Com erclal for of land located south of 24th Street between e and the I -15 Freeway; and from "FC" (Freeway to "GC" (General Comarcial) for 6.5 acres of westerly conjunction of Cherry Avenue and the Y. The City Council will consider other Etivanda Specific Plan land use categories 1 Comeercial, Convenience Comercial, Freeway - wmercial, OFfice /Professional). APN's L1, 12, and 226- 112 -03. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Dune approve General Flan Amendment 88 -03C and Ettwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -05. Further, the Planning Commission determined that no significant environmentcl impaLts would result from implementing the land use changes and the Commission recommends that the City Council grant a negative declaration for the application, DISCUSSION: At its September 28, 1988 meeting, the Planning amm ss on reviewed the subject applicatlors requesting land use changes for 63+ acres of land bordered ey Cherry Avenue, 24th Street and the I -13 Freeway. During their review, the Planning Conwissioners concurred with staff's analysis as detailed in the Planning Commission report of September 28, 1988. Significant issues which resulted in the recommendation included the following: l-5D CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT GPA 88-03C - ,UNITE)( October 19, 1988 Page 2 A. The bordering of the .site by two arterial roads and the freeway does not make the site conducive to a single family neighborhood due to concerns over noise and air quality. B. The surrounding characteristic which make the site undesirable for residential use alternatively offer good commercial development" opportunities fie., exposure to high traffic roads?. C. The ability of the site to satisfy existing General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan goals and objectives for commercial development. For an to -depth analysis and additional information, plesse refer to the attached Planning Commission report and minutes of September 28, 1988. III. FM.TS FOR FINDINGS: Based upon the conclusions listed in the attached Plann ng oemission staff report of September 28th and Planning Commission Resol�ttors No. 88-191 and W. 88 -192, the City Counc•i can make the Wlvoing findings regarding this application: ,110 Po.'r',Y Is suitable for the uses permitted in the droµ:sA lard designation and district in terms of access, as 4evemined by the Engineering Section analysis of the traffic stuttt oral proposed area roadway improvements; size, as rufIectad by smaller area requirements for potential altenlstive cm=rciai designations; and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area ds evidenced by general 1Rck of development and compatibility with bordering arterial roads and freeway; and, 2. TRe pmposcd amendments would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Environmental Study; and, 3. The proposed amendments :re in conformance with the GP and ESP as evidenced by the ability of the proposed land use designations to satisfy the commercial policies and objectives of the GP and ESP. 4. That a Master Plan designation is needrd to ensuna the proper coordination of a phased development of the site. 1sl ; UNITD(i 3 Page 3 p N F- IV. CORRESPONDENCE:" 'This item has been advertised as a public hearing h In e a Re or' newspaper, and notices sent to all property ormers w n; met of the project site. iV* V. ACTION: If the ,City Council concurs with the recou.mendation of the ann ng Comission. for approval of General Plan Amendment 88-03C and Ettwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88-05, the adoption of -the i S{y attached City Council Resolution and Ordinance would be appropriate. t ' Res ull t£ i✓ t q� Bra er - q' City P nner - d BB:AN:sd i` Attachments: Planning Commission Report, September 28, 1988 r Planning Cn mfssfon Minutes, September 28, 1988 Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 88491 and 88 -192 City Council Resolution and Ordinance i' C117 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �, STAFF REPORT DATE: September 28, 1988 TO: Chairman and Heabers of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Alan Warren, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMEROKENT N0. reques o amen a nera an n use p , from cry Low Density Residential (1- 21dwelling units per acre) to General Commercial for 57.5+ acres of land located south -of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway. The Planning Commission will consider other approppriate General land use categories (Nei hborhood Commercial and Office) - APR: 226- 121 -08, un.iu - A request ro ameno the wanaa Residential e l -2 dwelling unitsmmper acre) to •GC'w (General Commercial) for 67.5+ acres of land located south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway; and from "FC" (Freeway Commercial) to "GC" (General Cumercial) for 6.5 acres of land at the westerly Junction of Cherry Avenue and the I -15 Freeway. The Planning (:ommission will consider the other appropriate Etiwanda Specific Plan land usa categories (Neighborhood Commercial, Convenience Commercial, Freeway - Related Cometcial. Office /Professional) - APN: 226 - 121 -08, 11, I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Undeveloped; Hunter's Ridge Specific Plan designation R -1 4500 (City of Fontana). South - I -15 Freeway. East - I -15 Freeway. West - Undeveloped; Flood Control Corridor; Etiwanda Specific Plan Designation Open Space (OP). 153 ITEM H,1 PLANNING CO MISSION -lAFF REPORT GPA 88 -03C - UNITEX September 28, 1988 Page 2 B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential (less .hai -..elliog units per acre) and Commercial. North - very Low Residential (less than 2 daelling units pe• acre) (Rancho Cucamonga General Plan). South - Freeway. East - Freeway. West - Flood Control/Utility Corridor. C. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant and the land slopes gre ua y to the southwest at about 4%. Portions of the site are currently cultivated with vineyards. The Hawker Crawford Channel, partially improved, tr.•verses the site carrying storm water free the north to San Sevaine Spreading Basins. Surrounding land uses are primarily vacant grass lands. To the west exists the San Sevaina Spreading Basins which are used for store water detention and ground water recharge. The property to the north 1s in the City of Fontana and it is zoned for residential use and a housing project (Hunter's Ridge) has recently been approved. II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has reviewed the Initial Study, an case e e e Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment 88 -03C and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment 88 -05. III. LAND USE ANALYSIS: Back round: The existing General Plan (GP) Land Use Designation R ec s a City's policies to limit residential density in the Etiwanda and foothill areas. During the development of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) areas of special significance were reviewed and land use decisions were specifically determined. All other areas generally received the Very Low (VL) Designation. No analysis was made on this specific site and therefore VL was determined appropriate due to the above - mentioned policy. Discussicn: Analysts of the request shall revolve around the 0 ow ng ssues: A Appropriateness of the exlstin YL desi nation - The site is a triangular area o an oun e y arm er aT roads (24th Street and Cherry), Flood Control Spreading Grounds (San Sevaine Wash), and the I -15 Freeway. With the noise and air pollution from the freeway and traffic an Cherry and 24th, the site does not lend itself to creating a quiet rural atmosphere desired for a 1/2 acre single family residential subdivision •ne appropriateness of the existing land use and other more intense /54 DAMNIPLANNING CC.AIISSION AF} REPORT NG 88-03C - UNITEX September 28, 1988 Page 3 residential uses in close proximity to the freeway should therefore be questioned. Partial reduction of the residential designation cn the site is questionable due to the narrowness of the site hetw¢en the freeway and Cherry Avenue. Deletion of residential uses residentialasttri� along C� frontage would result B. Need and viabil.. of commercial uses in the area - The foes on the potential fo- rccrcfal derelo a area which site. The study conclusions indleate the folevelopment on the 1. The site has excellent locatfonal characteristics because of its freeway access and visibility, its scale (property), and its relative immunity from potentially competitive developments planned to the north of the site. 2. Pro9ection scenarios identify a window of opportunity in 1994 for the 0volopment of a 120,000 square foot neighborhood shupping center anchored by a supermarket and drug store or variety/hoa* improvement store. 3• An analysis of the potential of a more ambitious community -scale center (up to SO acres) indicates that there will be adequate untapped demand to support such a center. 4• Projected absorption potential for garden office space (two -story with a density of about 17,000 square feet / acrel to the near term is likely to be fairly minimal at one or two acres per year. S• A shortfall of 900,000 square feet of retail /service categories can be expected within a four mile trade area radius around the site at the horizon population level. C. Confmre..nr. ..r.w use category characterfzed by a broader range aofause activities than any other Commercial designation. It includes local commercial, community shopping /office complexes, and commercial uses surrounding the regional center. Further, the GP states that in relation to the local commercial type, future concentrations activities eactivities organl ed nine linear strip commercial fashion. eonfiguratl The site In its triangular On next to the freeway and bordared by arterial roads provides easy opportunity tr concentrate commercial activity. commercial /5S PLANNING COMiISSION .AFF REPORT GPA 88 -03C - UNITE)( September 28, 1988 Page 4 D. The ESP provides the following objectives for Commercial Services: Sec. 3.52.100 - Prevent future commercial areas and associated traffic from adversely impacting the character of the community. sx2 Prevent u lripaaociated traffic from adversely commercial the established core, including Etiwanda, and victoria Avenues. Sec. 3.52.300 - Provide future shopping and other coa.rercial facilities to adequately serve Etiwanda residents' every day needs with minimum disruption of the quality of the residential environment. Sec. 3.52.400 - Where appropriate and feasible without undue Jisruftion of residential areas, provide the commerc ial facilities to serve the Community as a whole. The location of the site on the periphery of the Etiwanda community is ideal to satisfy the above objectives. geometrics around the site will accoasodate� a. Caamerclal designation for the site. This determination is the result of review of the applicant — submitted traffic study and the recently completed design work for the designation of Cherry Avenue as a major arterial street to accommodate the ltrnter's Ridge development in Fontana. The access control for a commercial development will be provided by the addition of landscaped median islands in 24th Street, the Loop Road and Cherry Avenue. Recognizing that a major part of concerns relate to motor vehicle em1 provided an analysis based on the Etiwanda Specific Plan Environmental traffic study indicates that there wil for the totail proposed project area This 1s the result of significantly hi than the recent traffic analysis conclusion i!; that since the trips reduced, air quality 1s not signiflcan EIR was provided and therefore the on this area. /J the area's air quality ,sions, the applicant has raffle forecasts of the impact Report (EIR). The I be fewer combined trips than listed in the EIR. lher estimates in the EIR has identified. The for the area have been :ly changed from when the 11nal EIR 1s adequate for PLANNING COWISSION :AFF REPORT GPA 88 -03C - UNITEX September 28, 1988 Page 5 E. Consideration of alternative land uses - Other potential commercially related des gna ons fin-Muile—the following: 1. GP - Neighborhood Commercial ESP - Neighborhood Commerciai; Freeway- Related Services; Convenience Commercial These categories include shopping centers and convenience commercial clusters that provide essential retail goods and services to residents or occupants in the immediate area. The ESP farther defines the Neighborhood Commercial as meeting the needs of neighborhoods with a total population of 8,000 to 10,000 residents and that the primary use within the center should be a supemarket ranging from 30,000 to 100,000 square feet. Additional recoemerdations include that the site should be easily accessible by bicycle or foot, neighborhood centers should be not closer than one mile of another, and their location should not encourage vehicular traffic in established residential areas or on Etiwanda Avenue. Freeway- Related Services designation is intended to serve both local and through traffic residents. A typical fec';ity would include a service station, fast food and other. businesses which desire freeway erposure within a neighborhood center. This site wrild be able to satisfy the location criteria, for both uses, but at 64 acres only a portion of the site should be considered for neighborhood commercial activities. Convenience Commercial establishments are small, localized retail and /or service businesses Vlat provide goods and merchandise to the immediate surrounding land uses. Convenience facilities primary function is to provide a convenient place to buy groceries, but eating and drinking establishments, food and beverage sales, limited personal, medical, and retail sales may also be included. Sites should be about 2 -3 acres in size and within convenient walking distance or bike ride from the intended users. Again, due to the large size of the site, only a portion of the properties in question should be alternatively considered for this designation. 2. GP - Office ESP - Offices The GP and ESP discourage the proliferation of individual isolated offices. Instead, these designations encourage development clusters where office uses and support commercial services can be loceted. The freeway access and sizable area make the site an acceptable office site from a land use perspective. The limited office demand in the area, however, would raise viability concerns fcr this site now and in the foreseeable future. /�� C PLIINNING`cdmrsSloW':,,AFF REPORT GPA 88 -03C - UNITEX : September 28, 1988 Page 6 IV V 3. ESP.- Master Plan The ESP allows for the establishsent,of Master Plan areas. Because of the size of the site and the economic _analysts indicating development potential at various, times in the future, staff believes it would be appropriate to consider a master plan designation. This would result in the requirement of an approved master plan, with a phasing program, prior to any development taking place. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: Based upon the conclusions listed e above, staff eves a snning ,Coasaission can make the following findings regarding this'application. ,. 1. The property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed land designation,and district in terms of access, as determined by the Engineering Section's analysis of the traffic study and Proposed area roadway improvements; size, as reflected by smaller area requirements for potential alternative commercial designations; and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as evidenced by general lack of development ann compatibility with bordering arterial roads and freeway; 2. The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the conclusions and findings of the Initial Environmental Study; and 3. The proposed amendments are in conformance with the GP and ESP as evidenced by the ability of the proposed land use designations to satisfy the commercial policies and objectives of the GP and ESP; and 4. That a Master Plan designation 1s needed to ensure the proper coordination of a phased development of the site. CORRESPOM)ENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n The a Re rt newspaper, the property posted, and notices sec o a proper owners within 300 feet of the project site. e's �f r( i 7 n PLANNING COMMISSION - GPA 88 -03C - UNITEX Septrbor 28, 1988 Page 7 VI. RECOMMENDATION. It is recommended that the Planning Commission recammen o the City Council the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 88 -03C and Ettwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 88 -05 with a Master Plan designation by the adoption of the attached draft Resolutions. Re c idly b tt e d Bu r C1 nner BB:AN:ko atta0cents: Exhibit "A' - General Plan and Etiwanda Specific Plan Location Maps Exhibit "B' - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Development District (ESP) Amendment Map Exhihit 'D' - Nunter's ifdge Plan Draft Resolution EPA 88-03C Draft Resolution ESPA 80-05 a VL ESPA 88-05 VL 1r VL 11 VL OS ,' / t 11 CITY OP ECNTANX M 41 illill"N.MM14 H �o ylf=Km NORTH CITY OF ITEM: GPA 88.03C & ESPA 88.05 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: OA* �SCALE:� CITY OF MWANA MODOMAL VWWLOW.vM Lom4uckmjvppcg M CommumAL Am PACLHkN xm E)Wfm KWOLS om lFmx HLLSW Magma" LOW w,mw LD*M§Dnm "�w = Commummy comkoraw =3 WK060PNOW COWA 804r,=. ffim'�� am vwx Cmp mcmms-*�� M F820"COWAMAL C= CWrXTWALWY =1 FWW ComTy4uuTLwf Com cmp WW WW" Cr — 9PWA •CLUVAPm M "m �=� 0 UUMPLAMPOMMOD VL ESPA 88-05 VL 1r VL 11 VL OS ,' / t 11 CITY OP ECNTANX M 41 illill"N.MM14 H �o ylf=Km NORTH CITY OF ITEM: GPA 88.03C & ESPA 88.05 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: OA* �SCALE:� T. - r_ * . . I , .1 . .�, °,LIeIHx3 NOISIAIQ JNINNvad 80 88 rdS3 9 �£0 88 Vd3 •'A ZI �'ON()IVDl1J OHDKVH 30 A llo •„ • I I gyS yqy 7}N gNU NQQynny ss QSPD yy ss OVM�iSYLFNMI�L�YNVPV�PObSJtl I I 50bSOYk '38�4.1"�i7a99LPYCMi2:�G0 :::viii II > G YJ 4 .CVLYeYC64P9L �;e��2�t�sar ±� \y I " N�Syyr,[ s,s[( �(��yyBCyL" yG,E��8iyy�8.�gFqs�ppb'�i °u�myynyy$� C '�� II SH�ONP PONYy S�S�`LPPM- �UINtlS � Q m I m {. I 0 I 3 s� II ♦ z I ♦ ��r �� ♦ / 33 H i r ♦ ♦ � >c C7 D R1 I® ° +� m z ob 5a `� I - I i± e; Land l!% Z � NORTE; GPA 88 -03C a ESPA 88.05 =` CITY i OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:_ Hunter's RVdgo plan PLANNING DIVISION ��3 EXHIBIT: '°' SCALE: v . J -- K , I)I • OF 011 A;7 is . .�. Q M•300W 24 Sa.O AN 7tA11 l y"'4• � l0000 = 116 -10000 it 1.6 A`AG _ A✓�- f taaa►Al�ravoolTUL Q 111 -7100 177 7" \\ .• �� M sK1/ i _ 1 Q 1/d00o 710 139.9 \ v�� . 4 ..3r/ 1 •� Q 111 -4100 431 71.a QWINE- ]1000"Im*10use 320 37.1 NOW WARTUD " 230 10.8 a 911rTOTAL 24121 359.3 Mt.oeO COMMOCIAL � a]aw0toaocouAMMAL e.6 w c M I _ ° PARK 50.1 u we i4 1 T Q lOm1TAM 60100t toA • 410 a oral tot Immo ` Q m xt.s 1 aiM J Q pr m 117A "AC 5519 oaf r 77.9 jo If Q � �prsaT 1 1t1{.TOTAL Ttr7u x084 2167.6 ILI �� MW �ati0 • �� b � MIN41 Yli NfA 0AT1 .4.0 lAC brie ° 3t4r0f- .0.o0.,.sT ALA AC- 16TAPtt 3.5 01 1r m Hunter's Ridge A arccllc PLAN IQfpMMIRD FOR M U7Y a FOH7ANA waa +w °°'•'1O' Z � NORTE; GPA 88 -03C a ESPA 88.05 =` CITY i OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE:_ Hunter's RVdgo plan PLANNING DIVISION ��3 EXHIBIT: '°' SCALE: !, Chairmn McNfel stated he felt that a park was definitely needed in that area. He requested that correspondence with Community Services be made - Indicating the Pltnnfng Cosission's support for a park in that area. {„ Mr. Buller stated staff would Send a memo to Community Services. ' Commissicner Chitlea stated this was particularly important at this time because there were few available retaining parcels of land in that area. Motion: Moved by Chftfea, seconded by Blakesley, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 88 -038. Notion carried by the following vote: ' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHIiIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY r NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ROME ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK - carried H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEN'; AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 88 -03C - UWITEK - rtques to amen o rl'' an an se Residential (1 -2 dwelling units per acre) to General Coommercialafor e57.5+ acres of land located south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the General re and Use Th will and Officer- prAPN: 226 - 121 -08, 11, 12 and 226- 112 -03. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSwI awn mrtu,A ^, • UNITEx - A regaea am! wan a --- ^v. oo -ua ow ensity Residential, 1 -2 dwelling units per acre) W '6 • (General Commercial) for 57.5+ acres of tad located south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the 1 -15 Freeway; and from "FC' (Freeway Commercial) to "GC" (General Commercial) for 6.5 acres of land at the westerly junction consider thevother appropriate Ettwa daSpe^ -lfic Plan land use icategories (Neighborhood Commercial, Convenience Commercial, Freeway- Related Commercial, Office /Professional) - APH: 226 - 121 -08, 11, 12 and 226 -112- 03. Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman HCHIel opened the public hearing. Dirk Johnston, 2402 Michelson, Irvine, representing Unitex, stated they agreed with the staff report. As there were no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Planning Commission Minutes -4- September 28, 1988 ■ i x Commissionar Blakesley stated the site was more appropriate for office/ commercial development than for residential. He felt General Commercial sites arterialsn,9he stated thisiparcel area. Because of the access and he Proximity would major good buffer for the freeway. Commissioner Tolstoy recommended they approve the action because freeway exposure and the triangular configuration made it a poor residential site. He also felt the nearby market area would support such a center. He suggested the Commission should push for a master plan, and felt there were several uses available for the property, such as Neighborhood Commercial with freeway - related services and Office /Professional buildings. He also pointed out that the applicant should be sensitive to signaga needs for the center. Commissioner Chitiea agreed that a master plan was essential for the location because of the freeway exposure and felt the property was a gateway to the City. She stated the applicant needed .to be sensitive to the aesthetics and insure high standards from the beginning. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the Specific Plan could be very specific and indicate architectural style and criteria, and if that was desired it could be brought back as a separate amendment. He recommended it be placed on a future agenda of the Design Review Committee in order to establish parameters for development of the center. Commissioner Chitiea stated she felt the item needed to be workshopped at some point. Commissioner Tolstoy stated circulation needed to be addressed. Chairman Mc Niel reopened the public hearing. Mr. Johnston stated they would be happy to work with the City to design a quality project to meet the standards of the City. He pointed out the developer• agreed it was a gateway project for north Etlwanda and said the properrj was a long -term project, not 'for -sale' property. As there were no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Buller stated he felt the Commission could approve the two amendmrunts as written and have staff prepare a future amendment to establish the guidelines discussed Motion. Moved by Blakesley, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the Resolutions Amendment no. 88-03C and of the EtiwandanSpecifictplan Assessment t No. 88- 05ra1Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: Planning Commission Minutes BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NONE E14ERICK - carried -5- September 28, 1988 l� RESOLUTION N0. 88 -191 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA40NGA. CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03C. TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN FROM VERY DAND USE UNITS PER ACRE) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL OR 5715♦ ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF 24TH STREET BETWEEN CHERRY AVENUE AND THE I -15 FREEWAY, RANCHO CUCAtONGA, CALIFORNIA AND MACE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 226 - 121 -08, 11, AND 12. A. Recitals. (1) Unitex for approval of General hPlan ikxn8aent application asedescribed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amenboent is referred to as "the application`. Rancho Cucamonga conducted ea r duly noticed publicnhearinngg onsthe application,of (iii) All legal Prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: l iitaisitiltnta the tacts set forth in theRecls,Part hereby o specifically Resoluionare true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - refere rl meeting on September 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, .ht Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: land, basicallyaa narrow triangularnconfiyiuration. located on a side of of 24th Street, between Cherry Avenue and the J -15 Freeway and is presently " ndeveloped, Said property is currently designated as Very Low Residential VL "; and designated Very Low •VL "a(RanchorCuc mongaeGeneral Plan) hand subject site is The property to the west is designated Flood control/Utility Corridor and is undeveloped. The property to the east and south is designated Freeway and it developed with J -15 Freeway. / 0 1 RESOLUTION N0. 88 -191 UNITEX - GPA 88-03C Page September 28, 1988 (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and (d) This amaenaent does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Elements; and detrimental to(the adjacent properties and would not have a sllgniflcant injurious on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Declaration be issued. during the 3. above ereferencted meetingtand upon nthepspecific findings Commission set forth in aragrsph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The: 'he oroposed project is suitable for the us(* perm tted in th• Imposed district in teens of ccess, sire, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant Impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conforman:e with the General Plan. 4. This been reviewed and considered incoglia�neawithetthhef Cali California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance Of a Negative Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above; this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of September, 1988, General Plan Amendment No. 88 -03C. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. l �o RESOLUTION�Bn_ an_,o,� _ - 4. UNIMA, - 'UPA'aa -WC- . September 28, 1988 Page 3 APPROYEO AND ADOPTEO'T11IS 28111 OAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Cucaawnga. do hereby Secretary that the Planning i Resolution on Cress odu y Rancho regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comission held on the 28th day of September, 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY. CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK 11 (0g &._ ti t .ry A RESOLUTION N0. 88 -192 �^ A� LLM155I09 OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA, RECOFMENOIND APPROVAL OF '� UU DMENT1P88 -05, �To AMEND THE (1 -2 DWELLING UNITS P ACRE) omGN FOR 57.5+ ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH EIUEEN CHERRY- AVENUE AND THC- I -15 'FC' (FREEWAY COMMERCIAL) TO 'GC' 1 FOR 6.5 ACRES OF LAND AT THE IN OF CHERRY' AVENUE AND THE I -16 A"O r C2ALfiFORNI B AND WX AND 2265 A. Recitals. r• (1) Unitex has filed on application on behalf of INM Ccrporatfon for Etiwanda Specific Plan Aeenoment No. 88_05 as described in the titre of this Resolution. Hereinafter In this Resolution, the subject Etfwanda Specific Plan Awndaent is referred to as 'the application'. ' (if) On September 28, 1988, the Planning Commissfon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application. have occurred All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution B. Resolution. ROM. THEREFORE, it 1s hereby found, deter"fnad and resolved by the Planning Ccamissfon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: set forthlin theiRecitaals, Part Aeof finds correeciacts 2. Based upon substantial e, 'rote presented to this Coomissfon during the above - referenced meeting on S�Plember M. 1988, including written and oral staff reports, thppis Commission N•.sreby specifically finds as follows: basically a narrow triangularcconfiguration ,tlocatedxonn acres of of 24R Street, between Cher Ave Avenue and and the I5 Freeway; and at the easterly conjunction of Cher presently undeve1aped. Said properties are Currently ldesignated as and Is (V w Residents and 'FC" (Freeway COMbercial); and RESOLUTION NO. 88 -192 UNITEX - ESPA 88-05 September 28, 1988 Page 2 designated Hunter's Rid Property to the north of the subject site is g e Specific Plan, R -1 4500 (City of Fontana) and is undeveloped. The property to the west is designated °OP° (Open Space) and is undeveloped flood control area. The pproperty to the east and south is designated Freeway and is developed as I -15 Freeway. (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) and will provide for developert, within the district, in a manner consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and with related development; and (d) This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and detrimental to (the adjacent propeerrties would d would not have aisignificant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Declaration be issued. 3. Based un the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referpoenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (h) That the proposed amendment would not have significant Impdcts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and (d) That a Master Plan Designation is needed to ensure the proper coordination of a phased development of the site. 4. This been reviewed and considered in rcompliancea with ethefCalifornia Environmental Quality pct of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. 1. 2 and 53 above. this Commission n9hereby resolves inthattpursuantntoaSecticn 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Cade, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 28th day of September 1988, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment No. 88 -05 and with the incorporation of a Master Plan Designation. %D r_ J[ UNITEX'- 'ESPA:.8&05 ' ? �' September 28 „1988 Page 3 - • ,A - ' tt 6. The Secretary of this Resolution. to this Commission shall certify to the adoption APPROYEU AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1998. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA } BY 1?4l MC Cucamo 9a, do hereby Secretary the theinfareogmmotng i Resolutlan City duly and nc regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Coanw s d of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regnia aKetiy of the Planning Casts ion held on the 28th day of September, 1988 the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY,CNITIEA, HCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EHERICK K RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PLANK AMENDMENT 88 -03IC. TO MENNDMTHEGGEENNEERAL PLAN LAND NAP FROM VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FOR 57.5+ ACRES OF LAND LOCATED SOUTH OF 24TH STREET BETWEEN CHERRY AVENUE AND THE I -15 FREEWAY, RANCHO CUCAMORGA, CALIFORNIA AND MAKE FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 226- 121 -08, 11, AND 12. _+ A. Recitals. G• (i) Unitex has filed an application on behalf of INTER Corporation for approval of General Plan Amendment No. 88-03C as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan ,3 Amendment is referred to as 'the application -. Rancho Cucamonga�co ducttedea dulylnotic de public Planning gisonothefapplication, � and following the conclusion of said publid hearing adopted Resolution No. 88- 191 recommending to this City Council that said application be approved and that Negative Declaration be certified. Cucamonga hold a On no ticed9public hearing and Council of concluded said hearing Rancho to its adoption of this Resolution. 9 prior (iv) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the ^ity Council of the City of Rancho ppCucamonga as follows: 1. This forth in the Recitals�,nParthA. of thisiResolution arettrue and correctfacts set reviewed land onsideedtlinheCecepliance and etheflCalifornla�Environmental a Quality Act of 1970 (and, further, this Council hereby issues a Uegative Declaration) 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced meeting on October 19, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to approximately 57.5 acres of land, basically a narrow triangular configuration, located on the south side of Ual I" - Urn C0 W6 �• ✓� October 19, 1988- .,: Page 2" :\ -N '24th Street, between Cherry Avenue and the I -1S ' Freeway ;and is presently undeveloped,,, Said ° -• property is currently designated as Very Low i. Residential "YL "; and , x (b) That the proposed project is suitable for Ure uses.-perTitted ,in the proposed district in 9 terns of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area,' and •- (c) That the proposed amendment wnuld not have - significant.impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and (d) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. The City.Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the application. S. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1988. � 73 c' i s ORDINANCE 1;0. / i CITY COUNCIL 'ORRDINANCE,NO., ESPA 88-05 October 19, 1988 Page 2 2. The proposed district change would not have significant adverse impacts on the environment nor_the surrounding properties; and 3. The proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. - 4. A Mwster Plan - designation is needed to ensure the proper coordination or a phased,development of the site. Section 4: The City Council aoves desi nation ifrom 'VL"c(VeryPlow)t0a acre) to 'GC' (General Commercial)' acres of land hated south of.24th Freeway; and from 'FC' (Freeway, Coe a Master Plan designation for 6.5 a Cherry Avenue and the 1 -15 Freeway, 'ity of Rancho Cucamonga hereby' IB-05 cha nging the District , 31dential (1- 2•dwellinn units per caster Plan designation for 57.5+ between Cherry Avenue and the I -15 to -VGC' (General Commercial) with land at the westerly coUunction of Cucamonga. California. section and s hall cause the same toCber published ewithin fifteens( 5)o days iafter iits ee passage at least once in The Dail Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation publisheG in the City of r o, a ornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1988. 75 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1980 TO: itiyor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-038 Wrequest to amend tne Land Use p of nera lan from 'Park" to 'Very Low' Re_idential (less than two dwelling units per acre) on 3.85 acres located on the east side of Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road - APH: 1061- 691 -11. I. RLC NDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City ounc approve General Plan Amendmenx 88 -038. In addition, the Planning Comissior determined that no significant environmental impacts would result fi'= implementing the land use changes and the Planning Comission recommends that the City Council grant a Negative Declaration for the application. II. BACKGROUND: General Plan Amendment 88 -038, was hoard and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on September 28, 1988. This Amendment is in actualit,� a land use interpretation/ determination. According to the City s General Plan, future Parks are a fleeting designation, allowing for the proper identification of a location at the time of City acquisition. This alloas the City the freedom to negotiate a physically suitable location at a reasonable cost. In this particular case the Planning Commission concurred with both Planning and Community Services Department Staffs' determination that the subject site is not adequate from an access and site configuration stand point. The Planning Commission recommended that the park designation would not be removed but repositioned to the Intersection of Sapphire Street and Hillside Road. ThiA lccatiot would identify the need for a park in this general area (one mile radius of its designated location). When land becomes available and is acquired, the designation will be shifted to be site - specific. III. FACT FOR FINDINGS: Based upon the conclusions listed in the attached ann ng Comission Staff Report of September 28th and Planning Commission Resolution No. 88 -190, the City Council can make the following findings regarding this application: CITY "CWNCO' -1 FP R GPA 88 -038 - ,QUIUM October'19,` 1988 'Page 2 1'< 1. Th e, property., is, suitable for its integded use in terms of access and.ciroulation onto existing streets: 2. The propostCAmendmeet woutd'not have arty adverse enviromental impacts on.nd-to.the- surrounding area., 3. The 'Tproposedg.Amendment is consistent with the goal and objectives. of the-.Geeeral Plae. . IY. ACTION: If the City`Council Concurs with the recommendation_ of the FTan�og Commission for.approval of tbw reneral'P1an'Amendment 88- 03B, the adoption of tho'attiched Rev on would be appropriate. Re tfull i d, ad 1 er C1 tan BB:JG:jmb Attachments: Planning Commission Report, September 28, 1988 Planning Commission Minutes September 28, 1988 Planning Commission Resolution No. 88 -190 Exhibit A -1 City Council Resolution 177 r.. 2 1 s CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 28, 1988 TO: Planning Coimsission /City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONRENTAL'ASSESSMERT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-038 - ?ENT A request to —am-0— etTTino' se p Or rhe Ganeril Plan from park to Very Lou Residential (less than two units per acre) for 3.85 acres located on the cast side of Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road - APR: 1061591 -11. RELATED FILE: TENTATIVE TRACT 13359 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existfr.g Sing8le Fmily Residential, zoned for Very Low Residential, (2 dwelling units per acre) South - Existing Single Family Residential, zoned for Very Low Residential, (2 dwelling units par acre) East - Existing School, Storl Elementary School, zones for Very Lev Residential, (2 dwelling units per acre Nest - Existing Single Family Residential, zoned for Vsry Low Residential, (2 dwelling units per atre) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Park designation, subject to the footnote - indicated at the bottom of the Land Use Map. Morth - Very Low Residential, (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) South . Very Low Residential, (less than 2 dwelling units per act*) East - Existing School Nest - Very Low Residential, (less than 2 duelling units par acre) C. Site Characteristics: The site is currently vacant, however, It is adjacent o the Stork Elementary School on the east side. Surrounding the reet of the site to Single Faintly /78 G "ITY COURCIL STAFF REPORT 9gGPA 88 -03° - QUITESSENCE DEVELOPMENT Pagee2 er 28, 1988 Residential. The frontage and access to the site is on Sapphire Street. The lot Is a flag cto the site with n fro ntage on Sapphire Street of 40 feet. In addition, the site has an approved Tract Map 13359. II. ENVIROW401TAL ASSESSMENT: Staff has completed the Initial Study and reviewed the Environmental Checklist, Part II of the Initial Study, and has found no significant adverse environmental impacts to occur as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment 88 -038: anticipated that any issue of vehicular traffic impacts m It is t be successfully mitigated at the development project level. III. STAFF ANALYSIS: The requested amendment will change the sita's designation from Park' to 'Very Low Residential.• The park's designation location is subject to change according to a footrcte illustrated below the Land Use Plan Map, of the General Plan. The footnote as shown on the General Plan Map indicates. 'The sites shown may not be currently owned nor is the location site specific. The depiction Of a site is an indication of a projected future need that may be adjusted over time as the City and the School District develop.' Furthermore, Lhe Coamunity Services Department acknowledged in 1981 to Arlan Walton, former owner of the site, see Exhibit C, that the City is not interested in the subject location for a pork. In addition, the' City is currently not Interested in the site for a Park because of its s0•11 size (3.85 acres) and limited access to the site. In conclusion, the Park will remain a float'ng designation because I park is needed in the general area of the subject site. If the ,amendment is approved, ;taff will reposition th,2 designation at the intersection of Sapphfre Street and Hillside Road on the General Plan's Land Use MoD• Th is will provide for a park site 1n the general area without designating a specific site for its to in on IV. FACTS F0 =�5, General Plan Amendment 88 -038 will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause signiffcant adverse environmental Impacts. Should the Pianning Commission determine that the amendment would promote the land use goals and purpose of the General Plan, the following ffndingc may le made for approval: A. The subject property is found to be suitable for the intended land use of the amendment. 121 CITY COUACIL�STAFF REPORT GPA'88- 030% = QUITESSENCE DEVELOPMENT Sentember 28, 1988 Page 3 B. The intended land use is found to be compatible with the surrounding areas' in terms of access, vehicular /pedestrian w ctrculat�ion and intensity. C. Ito proposed amendment will not have any- adverse enviromental impacts that can-not be mitigated. 0. The amendment shall be in conformance with the goals and objective of the'Gentral Plan. s Y. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e a lie ort newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to a proper owners wi',hin 300 feet of the project site. vI. RECOMENDAT10N: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt e�fched Resolution recommending approval of General Plan Amendment 88-038 to the City council and issue a Relative Declaration, thereby allowing the designation to change from Park` to very Low Residential. Raspectfuily submitted, ; Brad Bu ler City Planner } BB:JG:mlg Attachments: Exhibit W - General Plan Map Exhibit '8" - Site Map Exhibit °C" - Letter Resolution m ( ge) Figure III -1 LAND USE PLAN RESIDENTIAL O VERY LOW <2 DU1JnC O LOW 2.4 aru4e O LOW- PAEDIUM 4.8mrsmc = MEDIUM a -u DV./Ac ® MED)UM -HIGH 14.24 Dirac HIGH 24.30UWAC ® MASTER PLAN REOUIRED COMMERCIAL /OFFICE COMMERCIAL O COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL O NEWBORHOOD COMM. •w REGIONAL COWERCIAL E OFFICE INDUSTRIAL t-� INDUSTRIAL PARK GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 00 HEAVY INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE O HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL = OPEN SPACE C� FLOOD CONTROL/ UTILITY COI "-� SPECIAL BOULEVARD PUBLIC FACILITIES eNJ EXISTING SCHOOLS FrFftl PROPOSED SCHOOLS' L=f PARKS'(ExsTm PAw s"owN *P') O CIVIC/COMMUNITY CATY OF FANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN <► ^.,, -, IN....r�.rr...q �.. r....'r... �r M...u.. i.r w� a. v�.r•..�� .r...rrrr..�r..-U.w 1�M1lP,ll CITY i O RA' CIS CLCAMOWA. PLA.•Y>ti1NC DWEM ITEM, GPA 88 -038 QUINTESSENCE TITLE, GENERAL PLAN MAP EXHIBIT, _A— SCALE+._ /S/ W 9. CITY OF rrEM, GPA 88 -OPB DUINTESSENCE IZA.NCI CI AIMONGA TITLE, SITE MAP PLrWNlNG D[VLSfQN EXHIBIT, - @__SCALE. NONE Y. � � C O} U > W" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • / m ramp 0.3.bhr -A:Oa U. S,Idre Iwb.Umd' 1u„C.lr . 1nbW,l,At.be June 17, 1901 >` Arlan Helton 5675 Sapphire pM- Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Hr. Halton: This letter is sent confirming discussions between yourself and this writer regarding potential location of a park upon your property at and adjacent to 5675 Sapphire in Rancho Cucamonga. While the General Plan shows an indication of a park upon your " property, this is merely symbolic of locating it in that `general" +. area. Upon $Pacific site analysis of your property when considering factors of: access, surrounding and directly adjacent land uses; and, mitigation to any adverse impacts possibly created by the introduction. of a park, It is felt that the use of your land f ^r a neighborhood park is untenable. We appreciate your generous cooperation and offer to help the City in this undertaking of providing more park land for its residents, how- ever, we are not considering the purchase of your property tcward that end. Again, thank you for your consideration. Car Ially, H i11am - Hol ey, �ireZto Community Se ices 0laa• , n WLH:nm EXl81T C / E3 'hFT0FFJCERO',:1o7+ RA. NCIIOCUCA }(ONGA.CALIFORNiA91730 • (714)989.1851_ 7 DESIGN R qt.- TRACT- 13442•- BAril00D- DEVELOPMENT - The design review of n9 a eva ohs an detailed s p an or tots of 'a previous ` proved tract map consisting of 152 single family lots on 14.8 acra of 1 d to the Law Medium Density- Resldentlal.Distrlct (4-4 dwelting� nits per c within- the'Ylctoria Planned Cosunity located ' at- the northwest corn of Victoria Park Lane aW Kenyon Nay - APN: 227 -541 -58 to'67. 227- 551-46 60; 227 - 581 -1 to 37., 59 to 76; 227 - 591 -23, 24. .' Y � B. ENVIRORK AL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 88 -28 - DAMON DECROW - The _ deveiopment1tof a 49 �o sp a ng squares ee on acres in the Park District (Subarea 7), located yEst of White Oak and at the terminus,of Spruce Avenue - APR: 208- 351 -78 49. C. TIME EXTENSION AR PARCEL NAP 8578 - SANTA FE/DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A v s3ii ion of lif acres of a into Parue ,ss within e n uaw mpact Heavy Irvlustrial Ards (Subarea 9) locatedron the south side of Arrow Router -as:t and west- of\ illiken Avenue - ON: 229 - 111 -23. D. ENVIROMAENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT DEVIEW 88-25- LENNON ARCHITECTS - 1 ee 4tvalopment of an office, woutActuring. and ware ouse building totaling 29,860 square feet`on 1.S A6res of land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located on the south 0de'of Sharon Circle eailr'0f Hermosa Avenue - APR: 209 - 261 -23. E. RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR CONDiTIOMAL USE PERMIT 88-33 - BARTON DEVELOPMENT e request or a Master on o�a�T Use eerrm a ow a cc na on of specific office and wholesale uses within the Jersey Business Park, located north of Jersey Boulevard and, st of Red Oak Avenue - APH: 209- 142-19, 20, 21. \ F. RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR CONDITION& USES PERMIT 88 -28 - PERRY - The eve oilmen o a 5,915 square toot re ng on 0:52 acres of land wiLhtn ad existing shcpping center in the Co ppity Commercial District of the FoothilySpecifie Plan, located on the sodtinwest corner of Foothill Boulevard nd Malachite Avenue - APN: 206- 261 -20\ Bret Horn Assistant Planner, reported that two cond tans had been added to Item firing that fencing- design be approved by f4 City Planner and tot. -1; adjustments for lots 1, 2 and 3 be completed p to issuance -of buil g permits. He stated the developer had been informed o the changes. M ion: Moved by Blakesley, seconded by Chitiea, carried 4 -0 -1, t dopt Item " as amaode and Itew3-through F on the Consent Calendar. -- — I e f f f t PUBLIC HEARINGS G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERA PLAN AMENDMENT 88 -03B - QUINTESSENCE DEYECOPREAT —A request o amen an us—T a map of enera aim Park ro very Low Residential (less than two units per acr_) for 3.85 acres located on the east side of Sapphire Street, south of Hillside Road - ` APN: 1061 - 691 -11. Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 28, 1988 / 87 Jeff Gravel, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Chltiea asked for clarification of the floating park designation. Brad Buller. City Planner, stated that where the City does not own property but a park is desired, the General Plan identifies this desire by a floating park designation. The proposal tonight would locate the symbol for the floating park designation at the intersection of Sapphire Street and Hillside Road. Although they were not currently pursuing parkland acquisition in this immediate area, the Coamunity Services Department had indicated they would like to retain t floating designation for that area of the City. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearinq. Jim Kibbie, 5707 Turk Street, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he was concerned that once the land designation was lost as park land, it would be gone forever. He also expressed concerns with the drainage. Joe Qainn. Quintessence Development, agreed with the staff report. He stated they felt the parcel had limited access and that it was not suited for a park. He felt that within a one -mile radius there were parcels better -suited for a park. Debbi Eggleston, 6844 Nevada Court, Rancho Cucamonga, stated she was concerned that if the park designation was moved to a corner, eventually the City would be out of land with no park having been built. As there were no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Chairman McNiel stated he felt that although there were not very many remaining suitable park sites in that area, this particular site was also not suitable because of limited street access. Coamissioner Chitiea stated the subject tract of land was land - locked with the exception of one street. She felt the park should have more visibility for safety purposes and for attracting use. She felt the City should try to locate and negotiate for a larger piece of land. Chairman McNiel asked if Comunity Services had a sense of priority fir a park in the general area. Mr. Buller indicated there was interest in obtaining a park In the area, but the recent focus was on looking for parks to the northeastern quadrant of the City where there were currently no parks. Commissioner Blakesley agreed the subject site was not suitable for a park. He supported the floating designation because he felt a park was needed in the general vicinity. Comissioner Tolstoy sated the physical constraints of the property dictated It be used for other than a park. He also stated he folt the drainage question had been adequately addressed at a previous hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -3- September 28, 1988 =e area. He requested that corre pc�pnce ritha Comwdefinitely nt ervicees De that indicating the Planning Commission s support for a park in'that area. Mr. Buller stated staff would send a memo to Community Services. Coommissio er woretfaw tatedblhis was particularly important at this time parcels of land in that area. Notion: loved by Chitiea, seconded by Blakesiey, to adopt the Resolution recommending approval of Environmental Assessment and General Plan Amendment 88 -038. Notion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CNITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: KONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK -carried I. awe111ng units per acre to General Covercl�Ytore57 6y ac S^ot land located south of 24th Street between Cherry Avenue and the I -I5 •FFreeway. The planning Commission will consider other appropriate GeneraF�Land Use categories (Neighborhood Commercial 226 - 121 -08, 11, 12 and 226 - 112 -oa_ , and Office) - APN: ' the other ann�nn.l.i. i Alan Warren, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, Chairman MCNiel opened the public hearing. Oirk Johnston, 2402 Michelson, Irvine, representing Unitex, stared they agreed with the staff report. As Ll:y� were no further comments, the public hearing was closed, t Planning Commission Minutes -4- , September 28, 1988 E RESOLUTION NO. 88_190 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOIMENDING APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 8&038 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM PAID( TO VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ON 3.85 ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET, SOUTH OF HILLSIDE ROAD, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA NO MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. Plan Amendment Notn 88- 038aas vdescribedhin fthed tain t le pofcathis Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as 'the application'. Rancho Cucamonga conducted a my noticed hpublicnhearin®onsthe application. (fill (fill All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: set forthlin etRecitals, Part A, of specifically Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon sub:antial evidence presented to this Comeission during the above- refer_nced public hearing on September 28, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Coamisston hereby specifically finds as follows: land, basicallyaa flag configuration, applies ated eastpsidelofLSapphire, south of Hillside Road and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Park, however, subject to footnote at bottom of Land Use Map of General Plan, and designated Very bLow Resident ale(less to than e2 dwelling g of the units per jacre) and is vacant. The property to the west is designated Very -Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and is developed Single Family Residential. The property to the east is designated School and is an existing school site. The property to the south is designated Very-Low Residential (less than 2 dwelling units per acre) and is developed Single Family iomes. g7 PLANNING COYIISS. RESOLUTION No. 88 -190 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88-038 Page 2 (c) This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will nut provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plrn and with related development; and (d) This amendent promotes- the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and (e) Tits amendment would not - be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and wa:ld not have a significant impact on the envionment nor the surrounding properties and that a Negative Oeclara•'ran be issued. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set fo•a in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted to the Proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and (b) That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nur the surrounding properties; and (c) That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, recommends Certification of a Negative leclaration to the City Council. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves on the 28th day of September, 1988, General Plan Amendment No. 88 -03B. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. l �� m: PLANNING�COM ,'ly:s'��*:;`:9��Y�,,.k�K <• �- �°- ,=h. . �,.'pya ".; -- •= ��'�s��.i ISSIr , RESOLUTION N0. GENERAL PLAN ANEk1 -'-NT 88-03B 86'190 y Pago 3 :wti r: APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMTER', 1988. PLANNING COWISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMM rar is r V D � ra u r ocr a ' I, Brad Busier, Secretary`-Of- the Planning Caaaaission of the City ofi Rancho Cucaaan�a, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was, duly and City of Rancho Cucamonga Sat A` regularPieetinyy ofetheaPlannfngCgCfssfOnonfhthe on the 28th day of Sep.eeber 1988, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONEPS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NORE AB3EAi: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK h. 1 CITY OF RANUIO CUCANKYNCA PLANNING IXVLSM Ige) rfyl, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 88.035 PROPOSEU GENERACTI-A-9- 'j rr,Ei LAND USE DESIGNATION EXHIBrr, A•! SCALE. RESOLUTION NO. 88 — lD A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO G. CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT c 88 -038 TO CHANGE THE LARD USE DESIGNATION FROM PARK TO VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL (2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) ON 3.85 ACRES ON THE EAST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET, SOUTH OF w HILLSIDE N SUP THERECFC�, CALIFORNIA AND MAKING A. Recitals. a z (i) Quintessence Development has filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. 88 -03B as described in the title of this Resolution. i Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred t, to as "the application'. (ii) On September :9, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and issued Resolution No. 88 -190 recommending to this City Council that said application be approved and that a Negative Declaration be issued. SJ (iii) On October 19, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho S, Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this Resolution. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this R•asolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. This Council hereby finds and certified that project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (and, further, this Council hereby issues a Negative Declaration). 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on October 19, 1980, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to approximately 3.85 acres of land, basically a flag configuration, located on the east side of Sapphire, south of Hillside Road and is presently vacant. Said property is currently designated as Park; and �ql r 1 x 9 CITY COIINCIRESOLUTI011 NOJ88 GEWERAL PLAIT ANEIOIiEIfT 8&038 October 19, 1988 Page 2 (b) That the subject property 1s suitable for the uses permitted in the Proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use In the surrounding area; and (c) That the proposed amendment would rot haro significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding Properties; and General Plan. (d) That the' proposed amerdment is in conform r,:e with the 4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the application. S. The City Clerk shall certify to'`the adoption of this Resolatlon. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of October, 1988 -k ,r •1' t 11 M i a,. r i i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO : Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Mik1 Bratt, Associate Planner SUBJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELMMENT BLOCK GRANT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR 1989 -1991 - To identify need for housing assistance in the City of Rancho Cucamonga as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Devolopment I. RECOHNENDATION: Staff recommends adoption of the attached eso u on approving the Housing Assistance Plan for 1989 -1991. I1. BACKGROUND: Federal regulations require all jurisdictions to prepare a detailed Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) once every throe years to evaluate and coordinate the various housing programs and policies operated by the jurisdiction to ensure their effectiveness. The last HAP covered the 1985 - 1988 period. The attached HAP addresses the 1989 to 1991 period, lie plan meets all of the requirements of the federal regulations regarding format and content. The information in the HAP has been coordinated with the update of the City's housing element of the General Plan, and with the update of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAB). 'II PUBLIC REVIEW: Federal regulations require a duly noticed public ear n9 a ore adopting the HAP, in order to ensure that City residents have the opportunity to suggest changes to the proposed Programs and goals. Notice was published on October 7, 1988. Re 11Y boy eed (/ � Br er City P nner BB:MB:mlg /3 I CITY COUNCIL ST /fF REPORT HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN October 19,1988 Page 2 Attachments Housing Assictance Plan 1989 -1991 Resolution Approving the Housing Assistance Plan for 1989- 1991 )q4 PAOMI TENURE rYPE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN j„ s. T TO: 9 -30 -91 H 4A 10 OIJ9InSI ❑Rnld°n ❑Ammdmmt lSMUNtl Y /AYNwn/W Ol/rswq l lD�ul PART 1 - HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS TABLE I - HOUSING STOCK CONDITIONS STANOARDUNITS S SUBSTANDARD UNITS S SUBSTANDARD UNITS SUITABLE FOR REHAB o=UIIBO O VACANT O OCCITS V VACANT V OCNFIBO YNIT• V VACANT Told L LeHtr lnmrlw UNITS U UNITS U UNITS U UHIi• U UNITS w• e e _ _— _ _•— - - -E —_ —_ - --d-- TABLE 11 - RENTAL SUBSIDY NEEDS OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS AMLL F ELDERLY SMALLP Y f LAROFPANRY f— TOTAL PART H THREE YEAR GOAL TABLE I - UNITS TO BE ASSISTED EHAOILITATION NEW CONVER]ION tO ISMIE wllI I>O lR•19 C0113TflUCT10N FE, (UNITS I - - -T IWflOVtMENTS (UNITS EXPECTED TO ASSIST LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS) 0 0 75 -i- I nD- o I I' -- b -- - TABLE II - LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS TO RECEIVE RENTAL SUBSIDIES ELDERLY SHALL FAMILY LARGE PANTY TOTAL A 10 W Al -130 -_ 25 175 14 T um TABLE 111 - GOALS FOR HUD RESOURCES: SUBJECT TO LOCAL REVIEW AND COMMENT ELDERLY SMALL FAMILY 'LARGEFAMILY TOTAL I IU —W — HOUSING TYPE PREFERENC_E!M•Ahlun NMnDrr of Units tAM w_p/ b AmpttY// NEW EXISTING + if tA•pplfc•nt wish" tOlW w SUn NrwdnSAPmcPPEopmdt w+tAln /tt Arnt6ctim - -_ PART III - GENERAL LOCATION 7 it zo l j§!!| ` | . ( 7 k 3Em i2 � §I d 3 :1 � }5i£ \� �!r ) k0� • .m 7 it rr v •NOTE (Fuctnote to Table II ,_line 19, and Table III, line 21.) The goal for HUD assisted housing show: only 20 units for the elderly consistent with the proport[tm of needs end,avallable'fundL This goal Is too small to allow fora feasible senior citizen project. 'A goal large enough to accommodate a feasible - a development, In order to maintain propor(lonality by family type, would necessitate 1. total goals which are extremely unrealistic both In relation to need and to available resources. Therefore, If an assisted elderly housing development Is proposed for an ' "` appropriate area of the city ' that Is accessible to public transportationtshops and services), the City of Ranch Cucamonga will consider amending Its HAP to accommodate the project and will at that time request a waiver of proportionality requirements based on reasonable level of effort and past performance. JOU/01g04•Narr 1 /q V / -Y4 ✓ f n.r„��tr Z t. R NARRATIVE DISCUSSION OF HOUSING ASSISTANCB NEEDS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1989-91 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN ' L DEFINITION OF SUBSTANDARD !' Units are considered to be substandard If they do not meet the requirements of the housing quality standards of the Section 8 Rental Assistance Program. n B. DEFINITION OF UNITS SUITABLE FOR REHABILITATION Housing units are generally considered suitable for rehabilitation If they are structurally sound and the cost of rehabilitation will not exceed the lower of the following measurer. • 80 percent of replacement cost of the unit/structure. • 80 percent of the market value after rehabilitation. An exception may be made In the rase of local historic landmarks. EL ESTIMATE OF THE NUMBER OF LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS (Le, THOSE EARNING LESS THAN 80 PERCENT OF THE RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO AREA MEDIAN INCOb1E) EXPECTED TO RESIDE IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA The estimates for the number of additional lower Income households expected to reside (ETR) In Rancho Cucamonga by 1991 are derived from the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments. Since the RHNA covers the 5 -year period from 1989 to 1994, the distribution for the HAP was prepared by HUD, Economic and Market Analysis Division (EMAD) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. IV- ASSOM ENT OF THE IMPACT OF CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS Although there was some conversion of rental housing to condominiums prior to 1983, there has been no Interest In conversion In recent years. Rather, there has been a revival of construction of apartments. Rancho Cucamonga's condominium ordinance limits conversions to no more than one -half the number of rental units added to the !OB /01804 -Narr - 2 /(�P 0 housing stock within the preceding year. No displacement Is expected as a result of conversions during the 1086 to 1951 HAP period. V. 111314ORrrY HOIE@iOLD NEWS Estimates of minority housing needs were updated based on Information provided by Jerry Nakano of HUD, EMAD. Displacement Is not expected to be a problem over the next 3 years because the city avolds displacing residents and there Is enough vacant hand that private developers do not need to redevelop and remove existing units. A. Black • 1. Lower Income households In substandard housing: 12 owners, 2 renters. 2. Lower Income households requiring rental subsidies: 2 elderly, 16 small family, and 4 large family. 3. Lower Income households to be displaced. none. ,. B. pr OHKta 1. F Lower Income households In substandard housing: 74 owners, 14 renters. 2. Lower Income households requiring rental assistance: 21 elderly, 221 small family, 55 large family. 3. Lower Income households to be displaced: none. C. Native American 1. Lower Income households In substandard housing: 4 owners, I renter. 2. Lower income households requiring rental subsidies: 1 elderly, 1S small family, 4 large family. 3. Lower Income households to be displaced: none. D. Asinn or PaWIe islander 1. lower Income households In substandard housing: 10 owners, 2 renters. 2. Lower Income households requiring rental subsidies. 1 elderly, 14 small family, 4 large family. 3. Lower Income households to be displaced: none. IJOE /01804 -inner 3 r( t ;I M z� M E. Total MIMdtT Hoaxholds 1. Lower Income minority households in substandard housing: 100 owners, 10 renters. 2. Lower Income minority households requiring rental subsidies: 25 elderly, 266 small family, 67 large family. 3. No lower Income minority households are expected to be displaced. VL HANDICAPPED HOUSING NFr Estimates of households with disabled members In need of housing assistance are based on the 1980 census and -data provieed by HUD, EMAD. 0 1980 disabled households: 1,341 households (8.9 percent). 0 1988 disabled households: 2,656 households (8.9 percent). Low and moderate Income (less than 80 percent of median) handicapped households requirbig rental assistance: 0 8 elderly. 0 46 one - person, nonelderly households. 0 149 small families. 0 37 large families. Special needs Handicapped households need housing units with access ramps and wider doorways, assist bars bt the bathrooms, lower cabinets, elevators (In two or more story buildings) and special lighting and safety features (In the case of the blind and deaf). VIL SINGLE PARENT HOUSEHOLDS Estimates of the number of single parent households needing assistance are based on the 1980 census data. 1080 Percent 1988 Total single parent housenolds 1,055 6.8 2,029 Female headed 823 5.3 1,583 1C8/01804 -Narr s 4 Daa db� Lower income single parent households 323 30.9 627 Pamalo headed 1 269 28.6 538 y : Needing rental wariMwnre 126 36.0 243 iu7T Female headed ,0: 31.1 195 Special Housing Ne-ds: Single parents wltii dependent children need housing which Is le ,K. =• af'Irdable and located close-to day rare centers, schools; and parks and recreation facilities. The 1960 census Indicated that a disproportionate number of the households headed by single women live below the poverty level, and are paylni more a4 than 30 percent of their Incomes for housing. , 4 VIII. OTHER SPECIAL HOLGWG NEEDS OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME .'• 1fOUSEMLDS i There are no other special housing needs for loiv end moderate Income households in Rancho Cucamonga. K 1M: METHODOLOGY r .', An explanation of the methodology used to derive the figures on the HAP Ls on flle In the Planning Division. 0; �z. 4.Y y h i, X i J JOW0180E -Narr 5 !' COMMUNCIT DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRA?IT NARRA7NB rOR 3-YEAR AND 1 -YRAR GOALS 1989 -1991 ROUSING ASSLSrANCB PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMCNGA L DITOLACBhniNN No standard units are expected to be demolished or toner Income households relocated as a result of direct federal, state, or local actions. A. 5 I. Rancho Cucamonga§ condomkilum conversion ordinance limits i conversions to no more than half the number of rental units added to the i. housing stock within the recedl D ng year, And requires that all converted units ul ut current code requirements. No conversions are expected over the next 3 years. IL 2. The City will design all public facility projects (street wideniags, norm drainage Improvements, etc.) to avoid displacing any households. ,40 houses will be removed unless affordable replacement housing Is available. 3. No CDDG funds will be used for projects which will displace low Income residents. 1 Rancho Cucamongas condominium conversion. ordinance limits coaverslors to no Moro than half the number of rental units added to the housng stock within the preceding year, and requires that all converted units meet current code requirements. No '.nversions are expected over the next 3 years. JOB /01804 -Nary 6 2. The city will design all put•llc facility pr0Jccts (street wldentnIM storm drainage Improvements, etc.) to avoid displacing any households No .. houses will be removed unless affordable replacement huuoing is available. 3. No CDNG funds will be used for projects which will displace moderate Incoole residents. 8. A FORDS LH PDESRRVH OR FXPAND TAH AVAILABILITY OF Aa PORDADLH HOCbD�`t,` A. 1. The city wBl continue to support the Section 8 scattered site new construction program for households coming less than SO percent of the r regional median Income to produce units affordable to them. 2. The city will continue to enforce Its condominium convarslon ordinance (described above). 3. Although in rem (tax foreclosure) proceedings are very uncommon In Rancho Cucamonga, the city will invcntigate the possibility of Increasing the supply of affordable housing using Property acquired In that way, and establish a system to handle such propertles, should they become available. 4. State law requires cities to offer Incentives (including public Improvements or density bonuies) to any protect with at least 10 percent of the units affordable to low income households. The developer commits to develop a percentage of units at prices or rents• affordable to lower Income households, In exchange for city Incentives. S. Twenty percent cf tax Increment funds from the city`s redevelopment Projects will be used to assist low and modernte Income housing development as neceSsary and as funds become available. Funds are currently committed to other p %ects, but will be available In the future. JOB/01804 -Narr ao.3 Y: 1 A 1. The city will continue to participate In the funding of revenue bonds for tie construction of rental housing where 20 percent of the units are set aside for households earning less than 80 percent of the regional median Income at rents affordable to them. 2. The city will conMue to enforce its condominium conversion ordinance (described above). 3. Although In ram (tax foreclosure) proceedings are very uncommon In Rancho CucamDW, the city Will investigate the possibility Of Increasing the supply of affordable ho,tsing using property acquired In that way and establish a system to handle such propertle% should they become available. 4. State law requires cities to offer Incentives (Including public improvements m density bonuses) to any project with at least 25 percent the units affordable to low and moderate Income households. several or the Planned communities In Rancho Cucamonga contain commitments for the development of affordable housing In the text of the approvea or proposed community plan. The developer commits to develop a percentage of emits at prices or rents affordable to moderate Income households, in e:rchange for city Incentives. 5. Twenty percent of tax Increment funds from the city s redevelopment Projects will to used to assist low and moderate Income housing development m. necessary and as funds become available. Funds are currently committed to other projects, but will be available in the future. 8. The city will amtinue to offer density bonuses and parking reductions to senior citizen housing projects In which at least 25 percent of the units are reserved for lower Income households at rents they can afford. 300 /01804 -Nar R DDy M ACTIONS THE CrrY WILL TAKE TO IMPLEmorr ris ONE AND THREE YEAR COALS A. Movbmae Revenue Boa&f2! ner2 San Bernardino County Economic and Community Development Department (by cooperation agreement) and the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency sell mortgage bonds to provide below market rate mortgage financing for first -time homebulers. Most users will not be low or moderate Income that Is, coming less than 80 percent of the regional median. Issues funding an estimated 1,500 mortgages were sold between 1980 and 1986. The goal will be realized, therefore, subject only to market condltloas and the developer's ability to develop and sell the homes. B. Multiple- Pamlly Revenue Boods (Reubs� By cooperation agreement with the County of Son Bernardino, rental projects In y; Rancho Cucamonga with 20 percent of the units restricted to lower Income households at affordable rents may be funded with county multiple- famlly rental revenue bonds. According to the San Bernardino County Department of Economic and Community Development, some 385 units have been funded but not yet built. However, market conditions and developer performance will dictate whether the units committed are completed. C. CDBG RehabWtatkuo loess Through a contract with the County of Sao Bernardino. the city offers low Interest and deterred rehabilitation loans to lower Income homeowners citywide. Approximately 6 units per year or 18 units will be brought up to standard through this Program. and the Senior Emergency Repair Grant program described below. Rental rehabilitation loans are given only to structures with four or fewer units where the owner or the tenants are lower Income. Rents after rehabilitation must be affordable. Up to five units will be brought up to standard through this program. JOB /01804 -Narr 9 �/ls D. Seaton BmMMT Rcaas Groats Through a contract with San Bernardino County, the city offers emergency repair services to low and moderate (less than 80 percent of the regional median Income). Approximately 25 units per year, or 75 units In total will be assisted through this program. S. Section a Bxtstlmr (or Successor Proeram) The city has entered a cooperation agreement with the Housing Authority of the y County of San Bernardino to administer the Section 8 existing and housing voucher ' programs. The goals reflect the reduced funding for this preg:am and the fact that x rents In the city are often higher than fair market rents However, there Is a good potential of using Section 8 existing In the density bonus affordable housing to be produced as a part of the large planned developments under construction In the city, r as well as In the projects using the senior housing overlay district or the rental _h rehabilitation loan program. F. Article XXXIV Referendum Authority The voters of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a referendum allowing public ownership or financing of low rent housing pursuant to Article XXXN of the State Constitution. This enables use of public housing and various multiple- tamlly financing programs. There are currently 11 units of scattered site public housing in the city. The city has entered Into a cooperation agreement with the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino for use of the public housing program. No funding Is anticipated for this program In the first housing assistance plan year. However, agreements are In place should funding become available. G. Affordable Homan Incentives State law requires cities to offer Incentives (Including public Improvements or density !anuses) to any project with at least 10 percent affordable to low Income or 25 percent of the units affordable to moderate Income households. Several of the 7013/01804 -Narr 10 Do( Planned omunitles In Rancho Cucamonga contain commitments for the developw •• affordable housing In the text of the approved or proposed community plan. The developer commits to develop a Percentage of units at prices or rents affordable to lower income households, In exchange for city Incentives H. Redevelopment Twenty percent of tax increment funds from the city's redevelopment projects will be used to assist low Income housing development as necessary and as funds become available. These funds are currently committed to other Projects but will become available In the future. i� L Senior ffott5lax Overlay Dlttrict The city of Rancho Cucamonga has created an overlay zone for senior citizen housing projects which gives the developer higher densities and reduced parking requirements In exchange for reserving a portion of the units for low and moderate Income seniors at affordable rents. N. EXPECTED A4PEDfAffi•fIS AND PLANNED REA1EDfE5 A. Problem: High Land Costs Increase the Cast of Hoesiag In Rancho Coramante _. Remedy: The city will continue to offer a variety of programs which taken together can •esult In affordable housing: 1. Density bonuses and the senior housing overlay dish lct. 2. Revenue bond financing. 3. Public funding of Infrastructure Improvements (streets, storm drains, water and sewer lines) to support new development B. Emblem: Reduced Federal Funding for Hnusimt Promms and Protect!; Remedy: The city will use 20 percent of the tax Increment funds generated by Its redevelopment projects to Increase the supply of affordable housing, after current commitments of those fund; are met. JOB /01804 -Nary 11 �d� Y. ASSURANCE THAT- AT LEAST 60 PERCENT OF THE UNITS REHABILITATED_ wrTH CDW FUNDS WILL BFNurr LOW AND MODERATE INCONS HOUSEHOLDS All applicants for below - market Interest rate (BMIR) loans, deferred loans, or emergency repair grants are required to submit evidence that their Income meets ellgiblUty requirements. This information Is checked by program administrators at San Beraardlno County Economic and Community Development Department and by the bank which processes the loans. All homeowners mus: earn Uss then 80 percent of the regional medlan In order to participate In the program. B. Rent�ledUnits The city's rental rehabilitation loan program Is designed to ensure that the majority of the units rehabilitated are affordable to and rented by lower Income households. If the property owner Is applying becsuse he or she Is lower Income, he or she Is required to submit evidence of Income. The owner is also asked to submit annually a copy of all leases or rental agreements (to verify rents charged) and a signed certif ication of Income from each tenant. The city will periodically conduct Its own surveys to assure that Income Information Is accurate and rents are affordable. VL GENERAL LOCATIONS FOR ASSISTED HOUSING Please see the attached map. JOB/01804-Nary 12 D06 , $r F F s � o• O a g f�7111111 z � J1 e� W i doe N ii g II o11 F J Q r�� N %- o (0 = U = a �. co m is �T N I~ch (�i T o� C ago UcaE c U U 316 i �m 0 (- AM HODOLOQCAL NOTES 190.1991 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PV.N CITY OF RANC1iO Ct1CANONGA PART 1: HOUSIf4G AS WANCR NEED6 TABLE I - 40 SING STOCK COmmoNs This labia addresses the conr•Itlon of the cx"tin housing stock. The Information was updated to 1988 using State Department of Finance estimates for January 1, 1988, Plus new construction through September 30, 1988. The Proportion owner- occupled, renter- occupled units and vacant units were taken from the 1980 census and applied to the October 1, 1988 :stim8tes. The number of Substandard units Is the some as the previous HAP, since the residential market is so strong that It Is unlikely that any more units have become substandard. TABLE B - RENTAL NEEDS OP LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS This table Includes both existing needs and the needs expected to result from lower income households moving to Rancho Cucamonga- Jerry Nakano, an economist In the Los Angeles P.UD Office, provided the estimates for these existing needs shown on linen 8, 9, 10 and 11. Future needs, or those lower Income households RTR In Rancho ^.ucamonge, and shown In line 11 are based on the figures contained la the RHNA developer: by the SCAC. No residential units are expected to be demolished as a result of federal, state, or local protects within Rancho Cucamonga over the next 3 years. Therefore, line -12 shows zeros. PART D: THREE -YEAR GOA L TABLE f - UNITS TO BE ASSISTED Column L - Rehabilitation Of Substandard units. This goal was based on the past Performance of the rehabilitation loan program and emergency repair grants which bring the unit Into compliance with Section 8 Housing quality Standards. A 5 -unit JOB/01804 -Nair - 13 j (� a. goal for rehabilitation of reutal units Is Included In recogn)tlon/hape that the new rental rah bWtatlea program operated by the San Bernardino County Wth Rancho Cucamonga, also, CDBC funds will be used by property o-Mers. This is a )Onserva- tive goal which we should be able to meet. Since all participants must be sower 100001o, the figures for lines 15 and More the same as those for lines 17 and lh I Colman M - New Construction. The 9031s of this column reflect the revenue -bond funded projects which have been approved and for which financing Is available. Since the tax law has changed, there are not likely to be any more of these units. The figure represents projects for which funding has been induced, but no construction has Occurred. Only 20 percent of the rental units wM serve low or moderate Income households (line 18); the rest will be above moderate Income. Cofomn N - Conversion. No structures not currently N residential use are expected to be converted to residential use. Column O - Home Improvements. This column contains the goals for the emergency repair program. The target Is based on continuation of current levels of activity. Since all participants must be lower Income, the figures for Ibies 15 and 17 are the same. TAME B - LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS TO RECEIVE RENTAL SUBSIDIES This table reflects the 30 Section 8 existing households currently in the community, the it units of scattered site public housing, and the 200 units (40 affordable) which will be assisted by the rental revenue land program. This Is again a conservative goal because it is unlikely that these programs will receive additional funding over the next 3 years. The total goal represents 0 percent of the total need shown on line 13. TABLE M - COALS FOR HUD RESOURCES Line 21 Identifies the proportion of the goals In Table R which are expected to be funded by federal (HUD) funds. Again, It reflects the existing programs and units in the city. Line 22 Identifies the maximum number of each type of unit which will be accepted by the city. Larger projects or a total In excess of this figure require city and HUD approval. JOB/01804 -Harr - 14 01r r x RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CIi1 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN;HO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR THE 1989 -1991 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. r "? A. Recitals. S� 'y (1) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is an Entitlement City under the regulations governing the Federal Community Development Block Grant program; (ii) Each entitlement City is requfrad to submit a Housing Assistance Plan (RAP) every three years to coordinate and focus the programs which it funds with COBG or other funds; and t= (iii) The next lannin p g period is October 1, 1988 to September 30, 1991; and (iv) Staff has prepared a HAP in accordance with Federal regulations and consistent with the Housing Eleaxnt of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and with the Regional Housing Weds Assessment prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments for the region; and p (v) On October 17 1988, the City Council held a legally noticed public hearing in order to give the public an opportunity to respond to the draft plan; sod the City Council has heard pubtic'testimony and received all public input regarding the City's Housing Assistance Plan. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby take the following actions: 1. Approve and adopt the Housing Assistance Plan for 1989 -1991 to guide ttie housing programs of the Community Development Block Grant over the next three years; and 2. Approve and adopt the one year increment of the Housing 4 Assistance Plan for the period October 1, 1988 to September 30, 1989. € � �I r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TD: Mayor and members of the Cites Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Yestman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT Rum 88-11 - approva ore appea o con ons or squaw foot two -stnry office building on .40 acres of land on the southwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road fiN a Community Commercial District within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. - APN: 207 - 102_09 I. REC"ENDATION: Staff recommends that the Council deny the appeal anff-drr—ec`fsfWf to prepare a Resolution with findings for adoption at the next meeting. II. BACKGROUND: The project was heard by the Planning Commission on gus , 1968. The item was approved 5-0 as submitted with the exception of the metal roof material. The project was conditioned for an alterntite material to be approved by the Design Review Committee. Attached are the staff report and minutes of the Commission meeting. The apolicant is appealing conditions of approval regarding: A. Alternate roof material 8. An arbor /trellis in the plaza. C. Engineering special conditions 1 -4. 0. Historic Preservation Commission recommendations III ANALYSIS: A. Roof Material: The project architect has proposed a standing seam me roof. The Foothill Plan calls out wood shingles, slate and metal as appropriate roof materials for this subarea activity center (see Exhibit 'E'). However, the Planning Commission determined that the standing seam metal roof was an inappropriate material for this project and conditioned that the roof material be changed to something other than metal, ai3 t CITY COUNCIL STAFF I DR88 -11 - MATr r)CR-- October 19, 1988 Page 2 :k subject to approval by the Design Review Committee. The Planning Commission was aware that there are other buildings on Foothill with similar metal roofs,- such as Vineyard National Bank, Michael J's and Harry C's, but felt that metal was inappropriate ro+f materinl for this project. The Commission noted that tile roofing will be used on the Thomas Winery Plazs across the street. The project architect contests that to change the roof material may require a roof design change. For example, certain pitches and structural requirements are necessary to accommodate concrete tile as a roof material. The Foothill Specific Plan states that "the Thomas Winery is the style determinant in this subarea ". The Thomas Winery architecture is representative of California Barn Style with multi - planed roofs (gable, hip and shed). The predominant roof material ilding (the Thtallestobuilding on theasit) isl constructed iof galvanized metal, including the roof. The proposed project features a metal mansard roof. B. Arbor/Trellis: The Design Review Committee during consent ca en ar rev ew recommended the addition of an arbor /trellis along 'he south side of the building. The Foothill Boulevard app Specific priate Plan accent calls arbors this subarea covered activity walkways cent r (see Exhibit "F"). The Design Review Committee recommended the above to provide shade in the plaza, and to provide a design featu,e consistent with the desired character for this area. The proposed plaza design includes raised planters, benches and stamped concrete paving (see Exhibit "G'). C Engineering Conditions: 1. Engineering Condition No. 1: "An 1n -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 k.v. electrical) on the opposite side of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length as follows: a. San Bernardino Road - from the west project boundary to the center of Vineyard Avenue. b. Vineyard Avenue - from the south project boundary to the center of San Bernardino Road." t s i. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT BR88 -11 - MATTLOCK October 19, 1988 Page 3 This condition was briefly Commission hearing. It was e are to be used to reimburse c of: (1) the undergrounding b project on the east side of future undergrounding on the Road. This 1s eonsistei Plaza, provides a rettiburs, be entitled as provided in scussed at the Planning tined that the to -lieu fees half the cost of a portion i done by the Thomas Winery eyard Avenue, and (2) the Ith side of San Bernardino with the current City case of the Thaws Winery o which the developer will conditions. 2 Engineering Condition; Nos. 2 and 4 (discussed together): No. 2: "Upgrade, modification, and relocation, as necessary, of the traffic signal at the intersection of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road shall be the responsibility of the developer.' No. 4: 'The developer shall coordinate ✓,th the developer of the Thomas Winery project for the design and construction of the intersection improvements including upgrade, relocation or modification of the traffic signals so that the intersection will be completed as a single project is approved by the City Engineer.' Condition No. 2 is standard whenever street widening is required at a signalized intersection. the developer requested that since the Thomas Winery project on the opposite side of Vineyard Avenue is required to perform signal work, the condition be modified to apply only if the Thomas Winery project is not completed. It was explained that if all the necessary work had beer completed, it would not be necessary for the applicant to duplicate it. However, the Thomas Winery proje::t is required to complete only the signal work necessary for its development. The Thomas Winery project does not include the construction of the curb at its ultimate location nor the relocation of the signal pole on the applicant's side of Vineyard Avenue Condition No. 4 merely requires that the applicant coordinate his construction with the winery project to minimize the disruption of the intersection. 3 Engineering Condition No. 3: 'An access easement in favor of the property to the w-st over the north/south drive aisle and portions of the southerly east/West drive aisle shall be provided.' The project is within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea No. 2, which requires a Master Plan for the area bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Vineyard Avenue, San Bernardino Road and the Cucamonga Creel Channel. The .` CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT OR88 -11 - HATTLOCK October 19, 1988 Page 4 conceptual Hester Plan submitted by the developer proposed a reciprocal access to the property to the west. Coidition No. 3 merely requires that an easement be provided to guarantee this shared reciprocal access. D. Historic Preservation Commission Recommentdations: Three con ons were present a ammng mmisslon as recommendations from the Historic Preservation Commission. Two of the conditions were applied specifically to the Thomas House: 1. The house and if possible the garage shall be moved to a suitable location off - :ite. The developer shall be financially responsible for an amount which is the equivalent to the high end cost of demolition. However, if after a good faith effort, a suitable site has not acquired the Thomas House must be fully documented by a pro fessional historic preservation consultant with photographs, drawings, and further, research to create as complete a record as possible. 2. Demolition permits shall not be issued for the Thomas House until building permits for the project are ready to be issued and a letter, guaranteeing that financing for the project has been secured, has been received by the City Planner. The conditions, as approved by the Planning Commission, stated that if the Thomas House were designated an hictoric landmark by the City Council then the conditions would be applicable. By direction of the City Council, the Historic Preservation Commission has reevaluated its recommendation to the City Council and has voted 4 -0 -3 not to recaamend a landmark designation of the Thomas House because, lackingg owner consent, the building did not meet all of the criteria in the new owner consen* iolity. Further discussion of the landmark designation has been submitted under separate cover, Thomas House Status ' Report, on this October 19, 1988 agenda. Therefore should the Council determine hietnrlr e,.,�,,,..m. •- ..___::� -- ., _______. _ The third condition under the Historic Preservation heading stated: 3. An archeologic survey shall be conducted an the site by a qualified archeologist. The survey and recommendations shall be reviewed by the City Planner and all necessary action as determined by the City Planner shall be completed prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Phis condition, is an environmental issue identified in the Initial Study and is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. in urder to grant a Negative Declaration Ino EIR D-/ (re CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT DR88 -11 - HATTLOCK October 19, 1988 Page 5 required) for the project, this condition was added as a mitigation measure Therefore, the archeologtc survey issue must be separate fr Q the Ristoric Preservation Commission recommendation to City Council and acted on independently. The applicant has stated that the San Bernardino County Museum V, was not significantly specific in designating this site as archeologically significant and that it is inappropriate to R•: require an archeologtc survey for this site when it was not a required for the Thomas Winery site directly east. A survey was not required for the Thomas Winery site because staff was unaware of the museum resource, and the potential archeologtc significance of the site, until after approval of - the winery protect. ?£ - Respectfully submitted, o� Brad Buller City Planner F BB:CW:alg Attachments: Exhibit 'A' - Letter of Appeal Exniblt '8' - Planning Commission Staff Report and Exhibits of August 24, 1988 Exhibit 'C' - Planning Commtssion minutes of August 24, 1988 Exhibit 'D' - Resolution of Approval with Conditions, August 24, 1988 Exhibit 'E' - Excerpt from Foothill Specific Plan Exhibit 'F' - Excerpt from Foothill Specific Plan Exhibit 'G' - Excerpt from Foothill Specific Plan ayC"pt: >C.;- ,- �Sie*,° 4'F.rn��''h."j'` _ �<K: •j. - ' • " � e..:�Ci �., +Fw•.. "'i {': *t., t GYG PZL.. CCAA. - "X1rtL CP 8-a7•s6 k, - 44 ,!yo- August 26, 1980 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .? Baseline Road •�..� Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 vA7,lr�° RES Protect _lccoted at'Vineyard & San Bernardino Road Small Office Buiidinq :k+ ATTNt CITY COUNCIL NENBMW -.� Please be advised that 1, the undersigned, who to the owner of said project would liken to appeal the decisions of the planning commission of-Auguat 24, 1908. The specific items ;t of concern are as follcwsv ., •• material used for the roofing Ly.+ •• *lattice patio cover, on the south sido•of the prtop�yerty.�a�t . • I am also very 8conceiiied'with all three items under the sj "Historic Preservation Committee' report. I disagree and am not in favor of all three items. It is my understandinq that all three of these items will be heard at the city council • the first meeting in September a I would request that the other two Stems also be hoard at the same Limo. 1 would sincerely appreciate hearing these r items at the same time, because it has already been over one year mince -h ve begun the process. Sincer61 y e, T Edward R. Combs, Owner 153 11. Central Avenue Upland, California 91786 (714)- 981 -0466 I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 24, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Co®Ission FROM Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Chris Westman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOF!IENT REVIEW 88 -11 - e eve opaen. o a square 00 -s ry o ce uilding on .40 acres of land on the southwest corner of vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road in a Community Commercial District within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Activity Center - APN: 207 - 102 -09. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site plan and elevations and the issuance o a mitigated Negative Declaration. S. Su- UF--in Land use and Zonin rlb�ii - -S ng a am y es aniial; Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) South - Singie Family Residential; Community Commercial East - Thomas Brothers Winery; Specialty Commercial West - Apartments; Community Cemercial C. Genestgnatims: Pro ec ral Plan Site De�ommercial North - Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) South - Commercial East - Commercial West - Commercial D. Site Characteristics' The site is loca^.ed w'Lhro a Footh.11 ou evar t v y Tenter, ;t I-. an under Ared ' egal non- conforming lot and there is an existing building which has been considered for historic la'rdtark status by the 8istoric Preservation Commission. lhat recommendation has been forwarded to the City Council dnu vitl be heard on September 7, 1988. The Thomas Brothers Winery protect is across the street to the east and as part of that protect Vineyard Avenue will h.+ realigned. lhere is an existing apartment house on the property directly west and the property south is largely vacant with a single family home. O I l ITM L 'f. " PLANNING COlMISSIO�' - TAFF' _. REPORT DR 88 -11 '- Matlock .d Associates August 24, 1988 Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Type Square Parking of Use Footage Ratio Office 6,385 1/250 II. ANALYSIS: t li Number of Number of Spaces Spaces , Rewired Provided 25 25 A. General: The proposed use is permitted within the Community ZEFR ercfal District. A conceptual circulation master plan was developed in conjunction with this project but is not part of this Approval. Technical issues have been resolved through the Technical Review Committee and the project has received recommendations from the Design Review Committee. The site plan and architecture are in compliance with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan design guidelines. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Blakesley, Caiernan reviewea tne review project on July 21, 1988 and made the following comments and recommendations to the Planning Crmnission: 1) Although a future reciprocal access easement will be required of the project, a landscape border along the western property line will be allowed with this project and removed at the time of future connection. 2) The recessed window treatment is satisfactory articulation. 3) Concept 'B' was approved for the west facade which shows articulated windows which are consistent with the overall building style. 4) The column at the southwest corner, of the building should be a minimum 24' square. 5) The block wall proposed for the project should be plastered and have a brick or similar type of cap which is consistent with the building. 6) The tower arch should be opened for interest. The Committee agreed to the applicant's suggestion of providing a clock in the tower element instead. Dam PW:HING CO!lIISSIOV -TAFF 3EPORT OR 88 -11 - Matlock d Associates August 24, 1988 Page 3 'f• N �r 7) A greater mix of everg"een, deciduous, and accent trees should be provided then what shows in the conceptual landscape plan and a greater emphasis should be given to " the northeast corner. 8) Within activity centers trees should De planted in a regimental style at a minimum of 30' box size in order to achieve sufficient height in accordance with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan guidelines. 9) The second floor on the south elevation should be f' redesigned to eliminate its bulky "add -on' appearance. x The Design Review Committee (Fnerick, Buller) reviewed the modifications made to the architecture on August 14, 1988 and made the following recommendations: 1) The Committee accepted Scheme "B' which is reflected in Exhibit 'C' as satisfying the recommendation to change the west elevation window treatment for consistency with the overall building style. 2) The applicant was requested to restudy the south elevation to eliminate its bulky appearance. The Committee accepted the scheme sham in Exhibit "C" and also recommended that an arch treatment be given to the doorway leading to the stairwell. 3) An arbor /trellis should be provided at the pedestrian area south of the building. 4) A continuous paving treatment should be used at the pedestrian area, the office entries, and for a connection between the two. C Historic Preservation Commission: The project site has an ex s ng s ng a am y res once and detached garage. The structure dates back to 1926 and was built and used by members of the Thomas family, Thomas Brothers Ninety, and by some of the workers at the winery. Although the structures themselves are modest the Historic Preservation Commission has recommended that the Thomas house be designate] as a landmark because of the original ownership. The City Council was originally scheduled to consider landmark designation on August 17, 1988 but the item was continued to September 7, 1988 at the applicant's request. dal 4w' PUWNING COMMISSIOP ''AFF REPORT 4 OR 88 -11 - Matlock ...J Associates August 24, 1988 Page 4 r The Historic Preservation Commission recommends the following conditions be imposed by the Planning Commission: 1) That the house, and if possible, the garage, be moved to a suitable location off of the property, such move to be partially funded by the developer (at least the equivalent of the high end cost of demolition). 2) If after good faith effort there is no place which to move the structure(s), that a permit for demolition cannot be issued until building permits for the project are ready to be issued and a letter is received by the City Planner guaranteeing that financing for the project has been secured. The Thomas house must be fully documented with photographs, drawings, and further research by a professional Historic Preservation consultant to create as complete a record as possible of the building. 3) Because of the project's Proximity to the Red Hill area, an archeologlc survey should be conducted prior to grading or building permit issuance. The intention for the letter which guarantees financing for the Project is in an effort to protect the house on -site until the project other project an Foothillm Boulevard rregardingbthe made usman house and the demolition of thrt structure prior to the project actually moving forward. 0. Environmental Assessment: The project is located within the City es gna e e Fault Zone. A geologic report has been prepared and is In the process of being reviewed by an independent geologic consultant to determine affects of the inferred Red Hill Fault to the proposed project. A survey of the existing trees has been conducted by staff. All but six of the trees are fruit or nut bearing and are therefore exempt from the tree preservation ordinance. Three of the trees are dead and one could be classified as "sucker growth'. The two remaining trees are a Crape Myrtle and a Pine. The pine tree will have to be removed for street Improvements and does not have the aesthetic quality worth preserving. The Crape Myrtle will have to be removed but could be replaced in kind with a 36" box specimen. Through proposed conditions of approval potential significant impacts have been mitigated to the point of insignificance. PLANNING COi MIOV TAFF REPORT DR 88 -11 - Matlock .J Associates August 24, 1988 Page 5 III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and Xhe Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The building design and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, are to compliance with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and all other applicable City Standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomends that the Planning Commission app YeT— opment Review 88 -11 through adoption of the attached Resolution of approval with conditions and issue a Negative Declaration. /Qu"Y g t ner BB:CN:vc Attachments: Exhibit 'A" - Location Map Exhibit 'B" - Site Plan Exhibit 'C" - Elevations Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Tree Location Map Resolution of Approval with Standard Conditions Da-3 1 3 M1' r =V to 15 o - is t I +� Z J aa� _� r WA I. a A'W, . it sw *Apo ry MZMIW .- na NII III Iii�1I111f i�ellll�vUR!l rirrrrrrrnrrmrrn �rrr�rrrrirrmrrr ' ar tro � TKaN v� !X►' "�Nq W" ND. b'i•C! a � •tS a C9J� 1�1 � •N r-4" 4- •. • P•nt n� _ c+ � _' H � t 1 • y' �1 A a Iwloc.�+ IV �� : M Li •L• *� II t J j �9 \lH 1260 t. 1'AOI I _LC_ r >n oL Y 1� �4 fl 0 _1 { v � I 1 Motion: Movea by Chitiea, seconded by Blakesley, unareeausly carried to continue Environmental Assessment and Development Review 88 -10 to the regular Planning Commission Meeting of October 26, 1988. • * + s r 12:00 A.M. - Planning Commission Recessed 12:15 A.N. - Planning Commission Reconvened Chairman McNiel asked for a motion to continue the meeting beyond midnight. Motion: Moved by Blakesley, seconded by Chitlea, i.aanimously carried to continue the meeting beyond midnight. f � r NEW BUSINESS L. ENVIROM PQJ IAI - Ine uev SuiTd ni do .a0 acres and San Bernardino R� Foothill Boulevard Spe on the southwest corner of Viney,rn AV Community Commercial District wit—in n - APN: 201- 102 -09. Chris Westman, Assistant Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman McNiel stated that during Design Review he remembered voicing resistance regarding the metal roof. Commissioner Chitiea asked if the stucco finish was discussed during Design Review. She asked if the applicant was planning to use the finish like the sample on the wall. Chairman McNiel did not recall discussing the finish. Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Ed Combs, owner spoke. He thanked Chris Westman for his patience in working with him. He stated they had worked on the project for 20 months when suddenly Arlene Banks called him to advise that everything had to be pulled because it may be an historical site, and that issue would be determined at the next City Council meeting. He questioned what would be required regarding the guarantee of financing required under the Historic Preservation portion of the Resolution. He stated he took exception to the archeological survey reouired by the Resolution and wondered why it was not required on the Thomas Winery site across the street. He further stated that in order to get the geological report, according to Richard Mills it might be necessary to remove the house. He also stated that he talked to Rudy, Project Manager from the lhrmas Winery project, and Rudy stated his contractors felt the house could Planning Commission Minutes -22- %D August 24, 1998 I i not be roved because it is on a rack foundation. He felt the only significance to the house is that it was owned by the Thomas family. There is nothing architecturally significant to the house. He also questioned who was going to pay for the documentation and pictures of the house. Tom Matlock, 502 Nest Holt, project architect, objected to the arbor trellis which was added at the Design Review meeting in August without the architects being present. He wanted to have the trellis removed. He also objected to Engineering requirements for in -lieu fees, items 1, 2, and 4. Because Rudy from the Thomas Winery project stated they would be doing those things, ha felt the conditions should be modified to show that only if the Thomas Winery project was not completed, they would be required to comply. He stated the finish samples were the finishes they proposed to use. Mr. Combs stated the metal roof they were planning to use was not a flat, sheet metal roof, but rather a grooved, baked on enamel. There being no further cements, the public hearing was closed. Chairman MCNiel stated the issues were the conditions in engineering and historical significance of the structure, which is a Council decision. Commissioner Chitiea pointed out the Commission had never before seen some o• the conditions under the historical aspect. She felt the Planning Commission and the Historic Preservation Commission should sit down together to discuss direction. She felt staff should be directed to set up such a meeting. She also felt it was interesting that an archeological survey was not required on the winery site across the street. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that during the review of a project on the south side of Foothill staff ran across a resource that the state offers which shows state- recognized potential archeological sites. This project appeared to possibly be within the area the state recognized. Because the Thomas Winery project had already been approved and processed, this project was the first to be impacted. Commissioner Chitiea objected to the metal roof and also stated she did not like the finish. Chairman McHiel stated he felt the small stucco sample did not show what a larger field of the finish would look like. He felt it would look somewhat like a mission. Commissioner Chitiea stated she would like to see an cctual application because she felt it would look spotty. Chairman McNiel stated the pocks would be of varying size. He felt the finish was appropriate for the building. Commissioner Chitiea stated she would like to look at a larger field of the finish and perhaps photographs. She felt the trellis arbor was appropriate. Planning Commission Ainutes -23- August 24, 1988 a31 Mr. Buller stated the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan lists specific actin`s which should be to activity centers, such as vine arbors, covered walkways, entry roof overhangs, multi- lighted windows, porches, etc. Commissioner Chitiea stated she supported the arbor and wanted a the roof. She also felt the Council needed to give direction in the historic preservation area. She questioned the difference between architectural significance and site significance. She felt no need to preserve buildings which were only site - significant, only architecturally - significant structures shou% be preserved. She felt it would be sufficient to mark significant sites by a nice plaque. She understood the aspect of getting financing because another old building was torn down prematurely. Mr. Buller stated a letter from a reputable financial agency stating they were committed to finance the protect would satisfy the Resolution provision for guaranteeing the financing. He also stated that if the Council did not support the recommandation for landmark designation, the Historic Preservation conditions of the Resolution were still important if the Planning Commission concurred with the Historic Preservation Comission. He stated that staff mould be willing to do some of the documentation if they were permitted to go cn site. He next addressed the archeological survey and stated that was a land -use planning matter and not specifically an Historic Preservation matter. Therefore, the Commission needed to make their decision on that basis. Commissioner Blakesley stated he felt it would be appropriate to have something more specific about why the site was selected before burdening a project with the archeological requirement. Commissioner Tolstey stated he was not happy with the material used for the roof, especially because of the Thomas Vineyard project across the street. He felt it very important that the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning Commission should meet to discuss recommendations. He felt the City staff should provide that documentation. He also felt that as Cucamonga Creek had flowed over the area, any archeological items would no longer be in that area. Chairman Mckiel felt that what the Historic Preservation Commission was asking for may be invalid on this particular property, but he felt the Planning Commission needed a report from the Historic Preservation Commission that identified what the Commission had discovered and told why it should be designated as a site, and if an archeological study is requested, they should state what t1my are looking for. Hr. Buller stated the Historic Preservation Commission believed there were valuable artifacts to be found. Not far from there the Indians had a pottery mill and they felt perhaps there could be some valuable artifacts. Commissioner Tolstay stated he felt at this point the Planning Commission was at a loss as to what to do without further input from the Historic Preservation Comission. Planning Coamission Minutes -24- 24, 1988 Commis3ioner Blakesley asked if Mr. Buller had any idea what the archeological survey would entail and cost. Mr. Buller indicated he did not. Commissioner Tolstoy asked 1: the discussions at the Historic Preservation Commission meeting dealt with the virtues of the site or the building. L; Mr. Buller responded that the predominant discussion had to do with Gle owners of the building, not the building Itself. He asked if the Commission felt uncomfortable acting on the Resolution without knowing whether the City Council was going to designate the building as an historical landmark. If so, they may wish to continue the item until after the City Council meeting. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing to hear from Mr. Combs. Mr. Combs reiterated he had been working on the project for the last 20 months, and the historic designation had only cow down during the last 45 to 60 days. He also stated this had never happened before in the City and stated he felt it was unfair to suddenly ask for an archeological survey and Historic Preservation requirements. Chairman McNiel stated he felt as a matter of policy there was nothing wrong with the conditions set forth for Historic Preservation; however, he felt it not appropriate for this particular property. He questioned if the Resolution could be processed with a recommendation to Historic Preservation. Commissioner Chltiea stated that she felt it was not appropriate for the Planning Commission to be acting on the matter without full information. Mr. Buller asked if the Commission wanted to put in a provision that these three conditions would apply only if the City Co -inch designated the property as an historic landmark. Chairman Mc Niel suggested that it be added that in the eyes of the Planning Commission this particular site was not suitable for historic preservation. Commissioner Blakesley stated he also felt it was reasonable to ask for some evidence that this might be an archeological site. Chairman McNiel recommended that the conditions stay in the staff report. + Commissioner Emerick felt Or first two conditions should be removed because ,s just by looking at the building, it could be concluded there was no + architect], al merit and therefore the conditions were not necessary. The Planning Commission did not have enough evidence to decide about condition 3. ;•3 Commissioner Tolstoy stated the next ties the Planning Commission gets a recommendation from the Historic Preservation Commissiao, more substantial facts would be needed. as c4* Planning Commission Minutes -25- August 24, 1988 Mr. Buller stated staff would forward this concern and work with the Historic Preservation Commission on the matter. Ummissioner Chitiea suggested the matter be continued until after the City Council meeting the first week of September. Ralph Hanson, 7eputy City Attorney stated they could go ehead and approve the project with the option that if the property was designated an historical landmark, then the three items would apply. He suggested ttay not delete the items. Me stated another option would be to continue the mutter. Chairman HcNiel stated the applicant objected to in -lieu fees for future undergroundir,9, upgrading and modification to traffic signal, and coordination with Thomas Winery for street improvements. He stated it was consistent with policy that wherever possible the Commission attempts to get undergrounding. Barrye Hanson stated condition 1 called for a standard in -lieu undergrounding fee and would have Mr. Combs paying half of what the Thomas Winery was doing. He stated it was understood that if Thomas Winery performed all the work, then it was not necessary for this applicant to do so. Condition 4 stated they should work with the Thomas Winery people, so that the intersection would not be torn up twice. Chairman McNiel reopened the public hearing. Mr. Matlock, project architect, stated the roofing material was an important part of the design element, and it would be inappropriate and difficult to change to tile. He also felt this particular metal roof looked better than many tile roofs. There being no further comment, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Chitiea felt the elevations should be changed to reflect a change in roof material. She felt engineering conditions should remain and she felt the City Council should decide on the Historic Preservation question before the Planning Commission decided. She felt City Council needed to set policy direction and wanted to continue the matter until after the Council met, Commissioner Tolstoy stated the minutes should reflect that the Planning Commission was at a loss as to how to act on the matter with the kind of information they received. Nation: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Tolstoy to adopt the Environmental Assessment and Development Review 88 -11 with changes in the roof material to be approved by Design Review and dropping out of Historic Preservation language if City Council saw fit to drop it. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EHERICY., "WIEL, 'OLSTOY NOES COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE I - carried Planning Commission Minutes -26- ��(� August 24, 1988 ? Mr. Buller asked for clarification regarding the applicant's request to delete the arbor trellis. The Coomission indicated that the arbor trellis is to remain. Public hearing was opened to allow Mr. Combs to state he felt no one would be walking there and it would only invite vagrants. Commissioner Tolstoy pointed out the trellis area would be on the side and would be used. He stated he could not see the applicant's objection. x f f f f f M. MODIFICATION OF A CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -59 - Agreement be provided for the future construction of a median island on 4th Street Oor a previously approved project, located At the northwest corner of 4th Street and Center Avenue - APN: 210 - 381 -9, 10, 11 and 210- 391-16, 17, 18. Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, presented the staff report. Public hearing was opened. As there was no public comment, public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Chitiea, seconded by Blakesley to adopt Modification of Condition of Approval for Development Review 87 -59. Motion carried by the fallowing vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, CHITIEA, EMERICK, NCHIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried DIRECTOR'S REPORTS N. ROCK CRUSHER DISCLOSURE POLICY Brad Buller, City Planner presented the staff report. Commissioner Chitiea presented a disclosure currently being used by Victoria t-hich included language on the rock crusher. Comoissioner Emerick asked that an illustrative list of potential types of impmcts be included in the disclosure. Mr. LWller stated there were three items in the staff report, which could be included. Planning Commission Minutes -27- �� August 24, 1988 ,r RESOLUTION No. 88 -168 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO MAMMA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 88 -11, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VINEYARD AND SAN BERNARDINO ROAD IN THE COMRINITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - AM 201 - 102 -09 A. Recitals. Devele (1) Ed Combs has filed an application for the approval of pment Review No. 88 -11 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as the application -. (it) On the 24th of August, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. (III) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. S. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it Is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Planning Comm ssfcn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I This alSi hereby i lttte facts forth in t eRe Recitals, Ao sResoluion are ruand correct 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on August 24, 1988, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: The southwest corner )of VineyardpandcSanoBernardteo Road; aro1pderty located at the (b) The property to the north of the subject site is single family residential, the property to the south of that site consists of a single residential structure, the property to the east is being developed as a specialty commercial center, and the property to the west 1s multi -famly residential; and - (c) The design 1s in substantial conformance with the design guidelines of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Comissior. during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the ppurposes of the district in which the site is located; and a�/ PLANNING COM1ISSV- R:SOL11TION NO. 88 -158 OR 88 -11 - Natloc znd Associates August 24, 1988 Page 2 (c) That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially Injurious to properties 1„ or improvements in the vicinity. 4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negati,,e Declaration. S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph 1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning 1) At the time of future connection to the west, that portion of landscaping necessary for vehicular connection shall be removed. Trees shall not be planted in that designated area in the interim. 2) The column at the southwest corner of the building shall be a minimum of 24• square. 3) The block wall for the proposed project shall be plastered to match the building and have a cap consistent with the overall project building materials. 4) A clock shall be included as part of the tower design. 5) An articulated arch shall be provided to the doorway for the stairway on the south elevation. 6) A trellis /arbor shall be constructed at the plaza area. 7) A consistent paving treatment such as exposed aggregate or interlocking pavers shall be used at the plaza, office entries and parking lot connection. 8) A greater mix of evergreen, deciduous, and accent trees shall be provided in the final landscape plan with general emphasis on the northeast corner. 9) A 364 box Crape Myrtle shall be provided on -site as a replacement for the Crape Myrtle being removed. The a plicant shall file a Tree Removal Permit application to remove tRe Crape Myrtle end Pine trees. 2-37 PLANNING COMNISS / "•' RESOLUTION NO. 88 -168 OR 88 -11 - Malec and Associates August 24, 1988 Page 3 10) All landscaping shall be done to accordance with the foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 11) Approval of Development Review 88 -11 shall not be considered final until the geologic report has been reviewed and approved by the City. Any adverse impacts found by the geologic study shall be mitigated to the degree of insignificance by conditions. These conditions shall become part of the Conditions of Approval of Development Review 88 -11 12) The roof material shall not be metal. The applicant shall return to Design Review Committee for review of the revised roof material. Historic Preservation In the event the Thomas House is designated an historic landmark, the following conditions shall apply: 1) The house and if possible the garage shall be moved to a suitable location otf -site. The developer shall be financially responsible for an amount which is the equivalent to the high end cost of demolition. However, if after a good faith effort, a suitable site has not acquired the Thomas House must be fully documented by a professional historic pre;ervatlon consultant with photographs, drawings, and further research to create as complete a record as possible. 2) Demolition permits shall not be issued for the Thomas House until building permits for the project are ready to be issued and a letter, guaranteeing that financing for the project has been secured, has been received by the City Planner. 3) An archeologic survey shall be conducted on the site by a qualified archeologist. The survey and recommendations shall be reviewed by the City Planner and all necessary action as determined by the City Planner shall be completed prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Engineering Special Conditions: 1) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 K.Y. electrical) on the opposite sides of Vineyard Avenue and San Bernardino Road shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one -half the City adopted unit amount times the length as follows: i • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1988. PLANNING MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO r1trAwnurA I PLANNING" COWSSKt.RE,966TIOi No. -88-168 DR 88-11 z-FAMOL: ""YW Associates August 24, 1998 Page 4 to the City prior to the,13suance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the city adopted unit amount times the length as follow: a.,. Son Bernardino Road - frw the west project boundary to the center of Vineyard Avenue. b. Vineyard Avenue - from the south project boundary to the center of San Dernardfno Road. 2) Upgrade, modification, and relocation, as necessary, - of the traffic signal at the intersection of Vineyard and San Bernardino Road. shall be the,responsibfilty of the developer. 3) An access easimint-fn favor of the property to the vast over the north/south drive aisle and portions of the southerly east/west drive aisle shall be provided. 4) The developer shall coordinate with the developer of the Thomas Winery project for the design and COA$tyvctloh of the intersection improvements including upgrade, relocation or modification of the traffic signals so that the intersection will be completed as a single project as approved by the City Engineer. S. The Deputy Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1988. PLANNING MISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO r1trAwnurA I r. 4 ° - °- PLANNING COMHISSt7!,RESDLUTION NO. 88 -168 DR 88 -11 = Nstloi and'Associates -, August 24,'1988 - Page 5`- I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Cooaisston of the.aCity of Rancho Cucamonga, do'hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution' was duly,and f regularly introduced„ passed, and adopted by the Dlanning CoawI iss on hele City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a' regular meeting of the Planning Coastsston held 24th day August,.1988, -by the following vote- to -+r1t: on the of AYES: COMMISSIONER -a: MCNIEL, CNITIEA, BLAKESLEY, EMMERICK, TOLSTOY - p NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COWISSIONERS: NONE dyc) -, s.. J.. ::1 2 f } \\ . b i $ ! 35 . s sin | � . � � , � | r k� .� t � : A5, (k* ■§| � | � ■ | | gild %h /k §` � �k �R -IN � j ■ , / | lie |�- � � � •, | ! ! | i ES ! | _ . � JQ| i , ■� !� � ! (k* ■§| � | � ■ | | gild %h /k §` � �k �R -IN � j ■ , / | lie |�- � � � •, | ! ! | i ES ! | _ . � JQ| i { { { ■ k � R R! � �s ' ' : : � ,VI% f2 § - H �A § �9 f� G! 2lfgq U ! | | 11-M-\ �\ Ij #■ � � R R! � �s ' ' : : � � � t |,| |i IL r ■q � ! \ - % Eq 2. : r #q � �� # �$� t �i � ;! j & "« v; If ■| § | ! w |� � a�� s3§ ira s -'• i� a �E Uzi �p �s� r� lyityi ?s i5 ai �i'pp• � .A jri _ r sa 3 1 ilii ' ! 3 8��3. - • -S7E ar3e_ ;i 3cE�� gal aSS'E Ea M11 lgl f a i . - z a I -. i iTL T ; s3 i nv s�E' 5s Eia� 1331 as= ;i a. . �e -4$= - E : -s a ..�s f -<:. tig 3s =<m Ea��S 8o�i )u3 sad 9aric� ?e� a�M ;5 pp gppp��1g a• -g ga a Ei�iFsr! ,�3�� 3rac35a Ea_ �. r e — =� .E E �.3F a ,�r;3asa rl \ w � § .. �- sf � | �! ■ 4 � � � q| �• `! &� � • #� E pt ! r/ !� � ) ! r § / 1'! / , §\ • � ST ��. 1 . :v 2T, �! all ! t /i-33 � | #5. §.f|t� / Q Hat ! !! & | ! �| ■ .r l,g t g!�« �� &��fa ■= ■� �� ! � \ |�§ _� ! \ /k2/ ®ql §s�/ .. a,j�i� agile! m 6 i 3s= ka i E a a i i =G �a 1 ga�a a;irai caaj d 32 :r a €:s aF t� _3 . 3a fs e sa Ws' a3� C 1 a 3 $d Y "s appp aye, 5j as H p is At 3' I i = kir F tam a ` �i -- a d's �9 �� Y�� •3 u is i a iii 3E a�ssn� a fits a 3 S 51, a i:_,� = =d3 saf 3� Is I s J. .31 k i� t • a ►i 3a sot is Sias :3��jjgg pp a_ Dina <$3 \ I \;I 41 D45 He =air= Alai =p pp 15 "31 rig jHCH ;65i as��i din a�a a a sera s: ash �sSa 3k i?e y yac� s� ESE t E a�E�� $ s tai s• p}� s J jai si3a ; 'e ids gs WI s :20- 5 = - =9 =y i a - g § l3 PH 13% rk lit lN!3 f :s s z !?Ft p =Js E =j to ^i ' E 7a ET 3?s =� �3t ?� �f s:l aj 31 SE -Sz S == 3 'f• ��9 d�a33d t f 3 'a� €? n3 F`e� 3! i r a ] �i e AAR tg� as ab%j as e ,hl As -3 sic F. �- sl 3; ; JI HS Es- • -a i� �� V s3 =I sjs !3 J as ab%j as e ,hl As -3 sic F. �- sl 3; ; JI HS Es- • -a i� �� V $ � q \ # _| k � � § \ r 9 NI ! 21 li \, #. �! Z/ ! \| I� / ' ^| ' `k go 'f I j f | | ! � � / N1 Ill - , , | q! • a e &� ! :! §!h `n•. ■� ,� 2a Via. q £ \ Icl3 3 ! q ,2!7| . �. ■a ! `e ■ �'• 5 @� § | |f \ �tq ■ |. ' ■�.� ; . M :i,� s . L l �� l� 1j; | §q \ q PI -I is 1; @ %ja.g // a�q |» �q,!!N /kƒ 2d t jKli A I j j j, 4 / j 1; 9.r.4 Architectural isagery y'r As prnilously mentioned, the Thomas Brother Winery is the style determinant " In this subarea. The main buildings at s the Thosus Brothers Winery do not por- t' tray •spacial" architectural features other tiun a grape mbar and multiple shed roofs. Investigations Into the archi- tectural heritage of winery buildings s sug.-asts that the structure Is repro- sentathv of the California Barn Style (see sketch). The simple, clean lines of (t. the barn In profile provide an almost un- limited range of architectural expressions. The barn silhouette is universally recog- nized as a symbol of the winery culture 3; and Is uniquely suited to serve as the primary architectural prototype for this F subarea. ?� Repeated use of building materials, color, and basic architectural elements, can be expanded so that proposed buildings can be designed In harmony with the basic contextual *feel" of the winery. LardscspefStreetseape Imagery i •' The concept within the gctivity center area is to Incorporate a formal, regularly spaced stmt tree planting system utilizing an Im"armally shaped, colorful street tree palette. The trees are to be planed 35 feet on center and are to placed between two to five feet Inside the property line (see Illustrations Section 8.3.2). ran iar �vr s,rN�ets rs,,aro ren- � � nuns 9.4.6 Design Palette: ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER DETERMINANT: THOMAS BROTHERS WINERY o Wait Materials: Textured stucco, smooth stucco Clapboard or board and batten aiding Vertical wood siding river Mck, fieldstone o Roofs: Cable, hip, and shed roofs Pitch - 3:12 to 6:12 Wood shingle Slate .. . Metal (colored narthtones) a Accents: Vine arbors, covemd walkways Roof overhangs over entries Multi- Iightei windows Porches Exposed rafter taHs o Scale: One to two stories with towers, pergolas, campaniles. o Colors:' White t3 off -white Beige, sand, warm earth tones Pastels with primary color accents ' These color ranges are only examples and are only encouraged to be utilized. C C �j �y law /boot- 101ra I w Ml7. Ad l 021 ant Immust M Tawwy \~-O AI&A-f7 MAADO "VAWVP GENERAL MATERIALS PALETTE CENCRAL fPESICN CUIDEL -rvT— AND DEV I FWrIMENT Suwo DC/9 je"lpf I r F) ,� M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVIEIOV I5D NORTH ITEM: VE 11 TITLE: i'ZA'?A 'LZ' Lh EXHIBIT: -a- SCALE: I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends e e y Council designate the Hellman Avenue Eucalyptus Windrow as a Point of Historic Interest. The Commission further recommends that the General Plan retain a 'Special Street Design" designation for Hellman Avenue. II. BACKGROUND: This item came to the attention of the Commission ecause o nquiries from the Engineering Division regarding future street widening once an underground storm drain is in place and the street is no longer a surface conduit for water. The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan designates Hellman from Base Line to 19th as a 'Special Design Street "; however, there is no guidance in the plan as to the intent or configuration this designation is to carry. A 1980 City Council had voted to retain the curbs and trees on Hellman Avenue. They also moved that their decision on retaining the curbs and tree•, on one property should serve is a precedent for the rest of Hellman. However, in February, 1988, the Historic Preservation Commission expressed the opinion that the curbs did not have historical significance. iII. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CLMHISSION ACTION: The Commission voted 5 -1, one member absent o recommend point of historic interest designation. A reason cited was that the trees are aesthetically pleasing. The Windrow also met several criteria in the Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance. An earlier motion, which failed 3 -3, was for the Commission not to designate the trees as a point of interest but to request retention of the Special Design Street designation, and if the trees must be removed, that specimen -sized replacements be used. Several members of the public appeared at the hearing, six of whom spoke on the issue, 3 against, 2 in favor, and one neutral. a51 CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT all DATE: October 19, 1968 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE HELLMAN AVENUE EUCALYPTUS VTRM I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends e e y Council designate the Hellman Avenue Eucalyptus Windrow as a Point of Historic Interest. The Commission further recommends that the General Plan retain a 'Special Street Design" designation for Hellman Avenue. II. BACKGROUND: This item came to the attention of the Commission ecause o nquiries from the Engineering Division regarding future street widening once an underground storm drain is in place and the street is no longer a surface conduit for water. The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan designates Hellman from Base Line to 19th as a 'Special Design Street "; however, there is no guidance in the plan as to the intent or configuration this designation is to carry. A 1980 City Council had voted to retain the curbs and trees on Hellman Avenue. They also moved that their decision on retaining the curbs and tree•, on one property should serve is a precedent for the rest of Hellman. However, in February, 1988, the Historic Preservation Commission expressed the opinion that the curbs did not have historical significance. iII. HISTORIC PRESERVATION CLMHISSION ACTION: The Commission voted 5 -1, one member absent o recommend point of historic interest designation. A reason cited was that the trees are aesthetically pleasing. The Windrow also met several criteria in the Historic Preservation Commission Ordinance. An earlier motion, which failed 3 -3, was for the Commission not to designate the trees as a point of interest but to request retention of the Special Design Street designation, and if the trees must be removed, that specimen -sized replacements be used. Several members of the public appeared at the hearing, six of whom spoke on the issue, 3 against, 2 in favor, and one neutral. a51 CITY COUNCIL STAFF Proposal for Desig; October 19, 1988 Page 2 )Res ully ltted, d City anne BB:AB:vc Attachments: Exhibit - "A' - September 1, 1988 Staff Report with Attachments Exhibit 'B" - Letter from Frank D. Green Exhibit 'C' - February 18, 1988 and May S. 1988 Memorandums Exhibit 'D" - City Council Minutes, December 3, 1980 Exhibit 'E' - Historic Preservation Commission Minutes, ,y September 1, 1988 Exhibit 'F" - Point of Interest Resolution CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 1, 1985 T0: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HELLMAN AVENUE EUCALYPTUS TREES BETWEEN BASE LIRE ROAD AND LA RONDA. I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation omm sEi s own rxamoend to the City Council that the Hellman Avenue Trees be designated a point of historic interest. II BACKGROUND _ CURRENT: The Hellman Avenue trees have came to our a n on ecausa at inquiries from the Engineering Division about the possibility of future street widening, and also in connection with the General Plan update in which the status of the street is being reevaluated. Underground storm drains will be installed in the next year removing the function of the street as a flood control channel. In February, 1988, the Historic Preservation Commission expressed the opinion that the high curbs are not historical, as is the curbing along Etivanda Avenue. The trees on this street are not on the survey list. III. SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The trees under consideration are the Eucalyptus 9To6uTus (Blue Gum) that stand on the west side of Hellman Avenue. The row starts approximately 250 feet north of Vase Line Road at the northerly edge of the parking lot of the church at the northw;:st corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue, and ends where La Grande forms a 'T" intersection at Hellman Avenue, about 125 feet south of La Ronda. North of the windrow a section of the street has been widened to the standard width with a standard curb. A section to the north of the widened area and south of 19th Street has a rural look with abundant vegetation and a variety of trees, including Eucalyptus. D6 f i r., t' HISTORIC PRE HELLHAN AMEN September 1, Page 2 STAFF REPORT B. Site Land Uses Zon1n and General Plan Des' nations: The rees are n e r g -o -way a acen s n ea ar y lots, in an ama zoned and designated on the General Plan for Loa Density Residential use (2 -4 units per acre). Most of the houses adjacent to the trees appear to have been built after World War II. C. Surrounding Land Uses. Zoning, and General Plan Designations: Tf—e :rees are surrounded by s ng I a TMI iy nouses, and Low Density Residential zoning and General Plan designations, except at the southerly portion. where Hellman Avenue joins Base Line Road. Hellman Avenue curves just south of where the row of tr es begins; on this portion of Hellman Avenue is a church, which faces Base Line Road, and its large parking lot, which stretches along Hall ean Avenue. At the corner of Base Line Road and Hellman Avenue on the east side of the street, the land is designated, zoned and used for offices. Also on the east side south of La !Mesa and just north of the offices are soma multiple family residences. D. Descrt tion: The 42 large and generally healthy trees form a 11 ne along the west side of Hellman Avenue and tower above it. They add a sense of place to the street. They are only 6 feet from the high curbs that characterize Hellman Avenue, which for many years has served as a storm water channel. The narrowness and very high curbs make the street substandard. The roadbed is too narrow and well- traveled by motor vehicles for children to safely to walk on. IV. ANALYSIS: A. General: The General Plan refers to Hellman Avenue as a inpthe Circulation sneF.lementn under the of heads g8'Sp General DesigPlan, Streets" is the following: "Hellman Avenue: The segment of Hellman Avenue between Base Line Road and 19th Street has been designated for special historic significance and should be studied to establish street requirements consistent with its historic character.' On December 3, 1980, the City Council voted to retain the curbs and trees on Hellman Avenue. At that time an approved tree removal permit for 6730 Hellman Avenue was appealed to the Council. The minutes read as follows: D6q '�'�'_ __ mac: °°_..,��;•:, sa;( ,.� HISTORIC PR;: aiTIOH C617ISSIOM STAFF REPORT HELLMAN "EWA! EUCALYPTUS TREES September 1, 1988 Pagtr 3 °Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to retain the curbs and trees on Hellman Avenue and to sustain the appeal. This is to be a precedent for the rest of Hellman x' Avenue. Also to have a lien attached to this particular piece of property In order to protect the futura interest of the property and the City. Motion carried unanimously When the General Plan was adopted in April, 1981, the special designation for the street was included. However, as far as r staff is able to determine, no designs were over executed and in the meantime as traffic has Increased, the problem of c retaining the high curbs has become more apparent. Street Widening: The curbs have been determined not to have historical significance; however, the significance of the trees remains to be determined. If the Commission decides that the trees have no special significance, they vould ordinarily be removed when the street is widened from its current width of 24 feet to a standard curb to curb width of 44 feet. At this time, the only trees being discussed are the Eucalyptus south of La Ronda wliere La Grande T's into Hellman Avenue because they were identified as a significant windrow on a map accompanying a 1980 tree preservation report, they are fairly healthy, and they help to keep the street's character that an earlier Council wanted to retain. As a way to improve the street while keeping some of the character of the portion between Base Line Road and La Ronda, staff has suggested a modified street section which is attached to this report, along with a memo to the City Engineer which explains the reasoning behind the proposed modification. The concept is to retain the trees, lower the curbs to standard height, eliminate the parking lane on the west side of the street, widen the driving lanes from 12 feet to 14 feet, and add a parking lane on the east side of the street. The parkway on the west side remains the same, 21 feet; the parkway on the east side would be 9 feet wide. Historical Significance: According to Commission Member Eugene Ill] I ngs, ie rees are younger than those in many of the windrows which were planted in the last century, but certainly they are well over SO years of They were planted alongside orange groves; many of the yards of the lots along Hellman Avenue still have orange trees growing in them that are reariant of the groves. Howeve•, staff has not found any re.ords telling exactly when and by whom the trees were planted. D b�vr HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONNISSION STAFF REPORT HELLHAN AVENUE EUCALYPTUS TREES P ppttember 1, 1988 It is important to note that these trees have been a familiar feature of one of the oldest streets in Alta Loma for at least 50 ncyears and probably more, that the trees performed the „ = fution of protecting the groves from the tremendous winds that blow through this region as well as provided shade, and offered a visual change from citrus groves, vineyards, and brush. C. Tree Preservation Report: According to a report on reserva • on o uca yp us trees in Rancho Cucamonga, ( "Tree Preservatlan: An Overview' City of Rancho Cucamonga, July, 1980) local farmers first planted Cypress for wind protection after a disastrous windstorm in 1688. After a few years, they Blue eGum, because they were tree, have 0long llife nspans, and were inexpensive to plhnt. Disadvantages are that thgr are messy, constantly dropping bark, leaves, branches, and se_+:t, and they require deep watering and much maintenance to Keep them attractive, free of disease, and less susceptible to !ire and limb breakage. The report states that other kinds of Eucalyptus are more appropriate for residential areas and that Blue Gum have n•ten not survived when there are tdjacent environmental charges such as new development or flew paving that cuts off the water supply and covers their roots. The report also emphasizes that the trees have become a cultural and aesthetic resource, and that the majority of problems comes from unmaintained trees. The report says, "One to analyze hazards and nuisances value they create' trees (page rs8). The potential concludes with a recaamendation to presntve selectively tho healthiest trees and most aesthetically pleasing trees located in appropriate places, and to replace others such that same wind control is maintained. The goal is that streets in the future will be attractively lined and shaded with the maturing trees and that some windrows -dill be maintained. The result of the report was a revised tree ordinance. The current ordinance states the following in Section 19.00.010 A. and C : A: 'Such trees are wofthy of protection in order to preserve the scenic, beauty, prevent soil erosion, provide shade, wind protection, screening and counteract air pollution D�S Page 5 ". REPORT C. 'In particular, the Eucalyptus windrows are a unique inheritance w,tose cumulative value as a windbreak system I Y. s a desirable resource. It is the 'Intent, of ,this chapter to perpetuate 'a windbreak system .through protection of selected Blue Gum Eucalyptus windrows and expansion of the system. T D. Environmental Assessment: Designation of lanUarks'and points o n ores are exemp$ ,rom CEQA (Article' 19. Section 15308)• = Y. FACTS FOR FINDIHGSi Staff has not fount fnfoiWfOn from A Histo ° oma, ram City files; or from personal lntery ews a re—se rees ave "specific historical associations: However, the following findings support designation of the windrow as a point of historic interest.. e A. Historical and Cultural Significance: i • 1. The proposed point of historic interrst is particularly ;i representative of an historical period and way of life. 2. The proposed point of historic interest 1s connected with a business and use which was once common but Is now rare. B. Historic Architectural and Ennineerina S1 iffcance: 1. The overall effect Of the design of tit. proposed point of interest is beautiful. C. HelghDorhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed point of historic interest materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed point of historic interest represents an established and familiar visual feature of the cumaunity. r a5� i s -TREES • � ` ' —' �, - Se testier 1E]W1988KAI.YPTUS .� -0,e ` VI. CORRESPONDENCE: uT111g Ttes has been advertised in the,04ily Reoort newspaper an ;ameri••along Hellman Avenue have-receTveea xr_- ' °w= pu c hearing notices: 0 „u Respectfully subaitted,,; Ns Larry Henderscn, AICP Senior Planner LH:AB:mlg - Attachments: V*w to City Engineer with Street Sections Plan View of Hellman Avenue betreen Base Line Road and La U Ronda Site Photographs Point of Interest Application Resolutions �� v N w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: August 17, 1988 10: Russ liaguire, City Engineer FRON:O:"' Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HELLNAN AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS Aaseollkn Road and neral lam designates *special the segment Of Hellman between thet it should be studied to establish reet regiire entseco consistent with its historic character. We received a memo from Walt Stickney asking about the historical status of Hillman Avenue and informing us that with the future construction of story drains, the high curbs will no longer be needed and that Hellman Avenue will eventually be widened to 44 feet curb -to -curb, with standard curb height. In curbsbdoanot h the ave Harty Preservation historical significance; thetsignificance of the Eucalyptus trees will bo discussed at the Commission's September 1 meeting. According to Jeff Barnes, the trees are in good condition with the exception of a few in front of one property that was vacant for a year or more. A previous City Council is on record as wanting to Preseroe the trees. The trees we are talking about are located on the west side of Hellman Avenue and ,lust above Base Line Road up to La Ronda Street. To comply with the "Special Design" designation, we are requesting consideration of the attached street design concept. After receiving your input we will present it to the Historic Preservation Commission for their comments and recommendation. As you can see from the attached concept plan, the parking lane would be eliminated west side Of curb ewhf dangerous a sloped area between the trees and the curb, a distance of about 6 feet. The southbound lane would be 14 feet wide. The east side of the street would have a 14 foot northbound lane, an 8 foot parking lane, and a standard curb. The parkway on the east side would be 9 feet wide; on the west side it rexains the same, 21 feet. This special street section would transition back to standard requirement at La Ronda Street. t Mr �1e {J•F ^O Improvements Please let us know your response is the next day or two so that we can include your recomsendation in the staff' report to the Commission. a AB:mlg cc: Malt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engii eer fl• ilfA He11Mn •" Page 2 �1e {J•F ^O Improvements Please let us know your response is the next day or two so that we can include your recomsendation in the staff' report to the Commission. a AB:mlg cc: Malt Stickney, Associate Civil Engineer Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engii eer fl• NI M w 0 �xisnryU s�� spry i � ' 5; 15rgj" � 14-, E /Ai` *N �y� E APPROX. 126' TOTAL OF .2 EUCALYPTUS TREES EXIST IN THIS AREA APPROX. 6' FROM FLOODWALA I I I APPROX. 225• BASELINE ROAD CITY OF R.-k..\CHD ci rA xi ykt-A ST ST. ITY HALL V� NMH urful PLANNING - � EXHIBSTI SCALE: - -_ { i ME A HISTORIC, COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY " Address: Aellm'en nan% y{ API: } VleV Looking htarf* Date of Photo View LookingjAolh Date of Photo , Page _, of _ Pages. LJH2 D, im r; k s r: e ZION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY =maw -• _ Address: // t Lr_�YLk i1 rw i APt: H View LookinqQej:MjLe5, Date of Photo_ x �N(G_ View Looking_ Date of Photo A' —fr _Page of _ Pages. LJH2 .a RESOLUTION N0. 88 -11 f° A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION commisSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE BELIMAN AVENUE WINDROW LOCATED NORTH OF BASE LINE, SOUTH OF LA RONDA AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST . WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has hold a duly advertised public hearing to consider all comments on the proposed Point of = Historic Interest Designation. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Comission has received and reviewed all input regarding said Point of Historic Interest Designation. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOV, THEREFORE, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows: SECTION I: The application applies to property located in the City's r i g:it- of -vay SECTION II: The proposed Point of Historic Interest mv,ts the following cr era established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho ucamonga Municipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed point of historic interest is particularly represencative of an historical period and way of life. 2. The proposed point of historic interest is connected with a business and use which was once common but is now rare. J. Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1 The overall effect of the design of the proposed point of interest is beautiful. C. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed point of interest materially benefits the historic character of the neighoorhood 2 The proposed point of historic interest represents an established and familiar visual feature of the community cCTION III: ] esignation of a Point of Historic Interest is exempt from CEpAr 'icTe I➢, Section 15308), ZETION IV -•ased on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this Coission an sed on the findings set forth above, CAI, THEREFC, °E IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Historic Preservatiai Cbmoiss a hereby approve designation of Hellman Avenue Windrow as a Point of n: Interest. ` APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS Ist DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1988. BY: u� o c m �ia roan AYES: COK41SSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: d ( r>' ♦ .s 9 !I .1. August 30, 1988 Historic Preservatiun Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Dear Commissioners; I wish to address my concerns regarding the proposal to desig- nate the Hellman Avenue Windrow a landmark. I have several reservatioae regarding this proposal that you should he aware of before any decisions are reachel. My name is Frank Green and I have lived at 7156 Hellman Avenue for nearly 30 years. The concerns I wish to address are in several areas. 1. I have lived with these trees year in and yearout and I have perhaps c different perspective of them than you might have. I see them as a dirty tree with continualshedding of bark, loaves, branches and seed pods. T_ am cleaning my yard and the pecking of their debris all the time. The City never has cleaned the messes made by the trees. I am and have always been an admirer and lover of trees, but these are difficult to even like. 2. Trues are adjacent to each side of my driveway entrance from Hellman Avenue, and over the years they have caused heavy damage to my driveway. Their roots and growth have raised the driveway some 6 -7 inches, have broken the concrete driveway, the high curbs and generally made a mesa of the driveway. For many years I have asked, pleaded and cajoled with the County and City to do something for me in this regard. People have listened, looked and tsk, tsked and nothing has ever been done. Now that the City Commission looks upon these eucalyptus trees as sanctified objects, help in the future seems even lees likely. I believe I could almost tolerate these [rasa if they had not and were not continuing to ruin my driveway, 3. Another area of great concern I have regarding Hellman Avenue and the trees is the extreme traffic hazard they pose, especially every time I leave and enter the driveway. I have to creep out onto Hellman Avenue before I can see around the trees to see 1 -' any cars are approaching. It is a danger to me and to the rapidly app- roaching cars. Also, I wish you could drive down Hellman Avenue and attempt to turn into my driveway without going into the oncoming lane of traffic. Hellman Avenue, in this section, is really a traffic hazard, made even worse by the trees. 4. A fourth area of concern is the danger the trees pose to my property. Over the years , gave been here, these trees have blown down. One crashed through my block wall fence and landed nearly on the front porch. Incidentally, I had to assume all costa to X repair a large eectio"f my block wall. no obli8etion, financially for liability. responsible if this were to occur again in designated a landmark? 4� I The County /City assumed I wonder who will be' the future if these trees have been 5. Finally, I believa that, ar. adequately widened Hellman Avenue weahed down would alleviate the many floodinge we have experienced v in the was I never want co nee another_ t arrified motWouldn't motorist i agwider street Hellman in his car during afooing. e this continuing problem? alleviat In summatinn, I would like to express moealaheI believers that TO - In the Hellman Avenue be properly and odequately widened to eat widen Hallman Avenue should be P P attars worse. Don t ) I believe a dangerous traffic hazard that 'a ha eucalypeuss need to go, one side, d. it once again. I am not against trees in propertyl at great they main should. Once a8 maintain, care for and waver a ocher tress on my P expense to ma. Among thou are 25 of the original cltrna trees of the grove the ttencompil cared efwesternw aide oftHe]Joao Avenue. we'll nd that or a always have those even though the eucalyptus go@ something should be done by the City to If my opinion and views are not of value in the decisions me e, then at the vary least, driveway and also something done to active correct the damage done to my the City should take a moreellman prevent further damage- Aleo, role in pruning cleaning and maintaining the trees along Avenue regardless of what decisions are made. Sincerel //y,�,.{q,,,,' —_ Frank D. Green 7156 Hellman Avenue Alta Loma, California s �„ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM vr. DATE: February 18, 1988 y TO: Barry R. Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer .y FROM: 1Lr li�Tdersrrn, Senior Planner M1 r SUBJECT: HISTORICAL STATUS OF NELLKAN AYERUE (RESPONSE TO INQUIRY DATED FEBRUARY 4, 1988) In an answer to your question as to whether the west side of Hellman Avenue south of 19th Street adjacent to Tentative Tract 13865, can be ultimate widening would beProhi b bited curb width, inn this oregarenIstestablished I' by the following factors: 1. The subject tentative tract site adjacent to Hellwn Avenue Y contains no significant vegetation whatsoever, including r' Eucalyptus trees. In fact, the only significant row of 3 Eucalyptus trees that could be found upon observation in the field, were a row of trees extending from Base Line ' Rosd to LeOrande Avenue on the wast side of Hellmmn Avenue. 2 considered by theuHistoricoPreservat onrCommissionlat8their meeting of January 7, 1988. HPC members expressed the e the in bhon nitoriHllman Ave uecouldnot ecsidereo es historical, as was the curbing adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue in the Etlwanda area, because the curbing was constructed as a portion of a flood way system. 3 alongsHeliman Avenueevident b tweenthat Base Linea ndel9th Streetuhave i been widened to the standard width with standard curb .nd gutter c.nstruction. Therefore the assumption must be tale langerfln effeet then a sqtaedmared street widthhw a areaeo curb /gutter section is preferable from a traffic safety standpoint. I hone this answers the questions you had concerning Hellman Avenue, if you need further information or have any questions please feel free to contact me. LH:vc cc: Brad Buller Barbara K.atl ' )Ila �v !•�:71J Meares Macad by Mete. stondad by pelesbo to stpar, 4seluttas Mo. N•l11 ' lad to vats all,, a""$. Mott" "rrtee reeirasy 5-0. Utz Olash Woatre a" e43s et tasoloetee 10. 60.111. P{ t SfSOLMOS t0. 60 -111 A UJCUrlOM Cy TR CITY MM C, SIC CRT 07 "100 COC"Y A. CALMMLA. Mullet jU TCO�CC «60171 AM=T70M M= 1 733. 1677. Ay 9667. �� setae y 61a/A FIM,. 'art 1�7 '�tOtO— Ip� Ott =• 7[tt[ sport rrF (l77 Yt The city s W rocalved ee appeal for r apy[aVed Tras M..m l revolt n 'sore that 4— 1"an Astr sea testa IOCAtoo at 6730 9a11"a Araar. I1r. *A,. ,ald f;. talnd y the Ctry: FI epps4141ee to the rural of ma taw hoA be" u- 3t. want Schlosser spread of ruiy for ►Wlte hearty. Y Dee Or"a, aposuas for his tather-ta -3r ty land at 6731 Souses An• •'-. eN4 a flea' of bulto th, RN seeuttl request dept", Sob lespadelo 6940 411rt trust, spok, is Ater of n the k ht&% curbs stages she atratt ar a sea' "try"& etwt durrttt the 'nee Aod the i^ Atq awst. iY There bolt' r furth'T teem' tests me audtsage,l PAY" Schlosser closed the ipp pent" of the erlMy. y. Covanlsss 9CS466 aaprasaA tbat it "Ould be e Crisis a choose WISAM Arrow 1 uou, 0e said that thA'InituLr Variety of sucal"M Kee lo Clem ACA the •!T�tAs-t ,r MCI"I hoM by Snd6a alto"" y yalst4o to realp the curt, A" true as Gllaas Aqua A" is sus,4o the appeal. l tl le to to a Precedent l asUCUlae a al Osllsa A1"ee. TPrecedent Alts, to hen a Ike attack" to this Yale[ aeadlua of propatq to eau to protect the future aarast of he ry ma ctry. Matt" anl" Imaelsouly 3-0. P HIM Schlosser C"W s Coca" At 10143 1-1. The Bratty se,,,,,ued at I1t00 p•e. tam 411 ap►an ad tbs :mG Il A" stall 'faster. 4, rtty MAMAen• a, nears 4A. A"UL Or pnrStO' SZCMTM M iLD ltit NTft tIM trn1, f1. Mayor Scblwa' ask" FCo. Mefstt to car f'Mrd. PA asked slAct1A4m to suaasi so the calf rs hot r! she has any Coorol i ;ft GM the state. C,tt "'tee. Th" I- Oudatbe %%IIJM tocadp939 the iluhvteb at Coupcil. the taitouly •actioneV" 2"Cate socas. After seas Aaawty by the Motlanl Mora by p,tctN. Snood" by Mihols a 'lieu the Mot!"" at9bae, epptho (June 119!) a e4on1:4 the cad Kill Coffee Shop at". Ma[1N passed by e a fcllsuaS "tat 47931 Mtkela 141oabs, Irtd9,, a" Smlaasar. MO[f1 feat "Sent Nona. (rote said he pp o;44 this belts. ho Alt w shntA costly utth our cup Otdlanta and asks this stag meths. C. :1 �_ Q'VuYri -7z) dt 4 . �:1 i� ..,Kl t•�.x 1,i `.y. M `;1� ='.` ` ��. 1.. .y iN'= _ _ .. �.,'�a •'y �: _�. i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r MEMOR.AMUM GATE: Ray 'S. 1988 a TO: Alan Warren, Associate Planner wn FROM: Walt Stickrey, Associate Civil,Engineer i SUBJECT: General Plan Update — Historical Status of Hellman Avenue (19th Street to Base Line Road) _ With ^he future construction of a storm drain in Hellman Avenue within the limits from Base Line Road to 19th Street, it will no longer --be necessary to maintain the high curbing which now exists for, the flood way. After the installation of that storm drain, Hellman Avenue should eventually be widened to a 44' curb to curb width (collector status) with standard curb height. The Eucalyptus trees on the west side of Hellman Avenue may still be of a historic nature and if so, any future widening of Hellman Avenue would have to account for them. Please update the General Plan to reflect the Hellman Avenue widening and curb height change (and, if warranted, eliminate the `Special Pesiga Street" designation). Attached is Larry Henderson's memo to Barrye Hanson regarding the widening, curb height and vegetation on Hellman Avenue. WS:sd Attachment i r P: !1 t J F-- - i 1 NELLMAN FIVE. SCALE: 1 ^ HELLMR/I FVE £F:'/ •., 7. 40fDtr utaJw.r. C- orclla m, maim reqea.ted star Its •1• b* rowed aloe. tyre w m b kq eat* "ai rub"tted to the army. Issue w tle nitw at 9crfemeeae Seed Let #pope PLaac(y _ for tract 9710. - a. Appmrai at Wmmn . 1*3"rer so. 9042 -7 f6r.1200.376.24. b. AlC Aoly fetenp ureeas far Dnaty 1. 41au*m. no Cob. MU frothill (l I -14"Alt — .+ala bear coed .1me. e. Atcoytla Mneals LLemea for Sin feel!" ALcliesao Ise. for gaf Cn sb.rSe (: rte.. Wldoe Codbory. Wort Jensen, Jeeyh I*ragltae., reould Wycoa Mrtkl*, Ae latltle Anna#. 9213 AeehlbsW Armue — m Ate lateral. d. rorrard Chia ha fod y J. f.atheaek " ty City Attoeap for N—AlLOr. (l s. roraced Clan fro ■alt! Ail. Ykar to eta City "teeny for haedfadg• (A f. "tynutim for the Deputy city Clark m ett." ty 1931 City Clan, laai.ce. Jmay 14-16 I. Seceowto, Ketimeed coon 3200.00. t. Ylabars.oen[ Atratyot Sat [aleeatieg on t"uatrfal A..ousaet District. (3 Amrarat of aicasseot to allow niabureaemc Of SIS,C00 to "easaeent tatleterto3 ova late! Couee.t for aoueaowe Dntrlee 7 }l. lye. Loco" M.0 poly be rely ursed so the dLtrtct n appretea coed farad. if b. Caotlect "deadr to C.n*!!m 9troue PeaLlr..pat project, Approral of nits wo" (f to carer the cost of ItmToral design o[ the eeqwim of • box culsort to"Ited to cc"Imte ty Caral#ln Strout raalltea*oc. L. OLoyard Arsaue 4*ito S*ret<eal Apprmtl of eaetr"t rlth C D Ltty*e"og to li.. cosDl*n "tbt ef. l a"alainea. railroad eeardiacim. Aed ya13n of the plap"d earrlcu� protect. L@#e "d apyrorel y ansnet vlth the City et Ontario for e4dlat '! .j -'r Den.!*. ]r. 1970 _ 5 ��: H. rI \.t6 ,Aa: Crff MY cwwm Kr 'Y(+.• n'Y•7a�._;s 4nitr ricefn.° `(1'.'4e .. ,:.tip St of eW Cte7 Camril eau told 1a the µea'. lark fm�vtp Gotae.,,rM1 ,9131 Wei ism toed, Pock@ Oea.mmta. m Wdwyl. D.e met 7, 1980. Ih* what a'.i w tall*d n ft"' At 7102 p.s. y Ktyor Shiny 0. Schtesear who 1N in ty Ilat Y" i . @slut*. - , F: h.eaaes tsalvaMS Joe D. N(Lai#, Slehaal A. pain@@, trtmr t. irWN. sod Myer 9kt1119 0. Srhleaa.r. > .Y` Also Presents C( '.'r'.. y p4aAter. )arm M. Yw"eeep 4#Ltmc C!y enemy. robs" it; t•! �rc/tl W y� icu m Sabiese.I Co®1tI D@rslap.sot Otn<nr. Jack "@seamy me7s Saul.. Dot"' UUU s�bll.y "d SoNep 7toAme Otractor. Sexy Ab*AVc, C'V —Uam J. C. freer Apprerai at ML .t It v -".at" that a tam. be `• coact'" m Pet* 7. S.ee1m u. *lasb 9arett pb, Liao thr.. u rallwus Seater. hs colt that ese weWd ba rant@. u w dU me require . 4• type oaf thvwp `%X th. Coy dea n fin p"blw created ... beucse of the via".. Unicar ".ad by laiae., aacaafnd 0� • n appra,. the @..Wed ee "eared sltea at btee0tr S. 1990. , )poaim e@rrlad A 1-0. (comttlan Iron abnot7. .. 7. 40fDtr utaJw.r. C- orclla m, maim reqea.ted star Its •1• b* rowed aloe. tyre w m b kq eat* "ai rub"tted to the army. Issue w tle nitw at 9crfemeeae Seed Let #pope PLaac(y _ for tract 9710. - a. Appmrai at Wmmn . 1*3"rer so. 9042 -7 f6r.1200.376.24. b. AlC Aoly fetenp ureeas far Dnaty 1. 41au*m. no Cob. MU frothill (l I -14"Alt — .+ala bear coed .1me. e. Atcoytla Mneals LLemea for Sin feel!" ALcliesao Ise. for gaf Cn sb.rSe (: rte.. Wldoe Codbory. Wort Jensen, Jeeyh I*ragltae., reould Wycoa Mrtkl*, Ae latltle Anna#. 9213 AeehlbsW Armue — m Ate lateral. d. rorrard Chia ha fod y J. f.atheaek " ty City Attoeap for N—AlLOr. (l s. roraced Clan fro ■alt! Ail. Ykar to eta City "teeny for haedfadg• (A f. "tynutim for the Deputy city Clark m ett." ty 1931 City Clan, laai.ce. Jmay 14-16 I. Seceowto, Ketimeed coon 3200.00. t. Ylabars.oen[ Atratyot Sat [aleeatieg on t"uatrfal A..ousaet District. (3 Amrarat of aicasseot to allow niabureaemc Of SIS,C00 to "easaeent tatleterto3 ova late! Couee.t for aoueaowe Dntrlee 7 }l. lye. Loco" M.0 poly be rely ursed so the dLtrtct n appretea coed farad. if b. Caotlect "deadr to C.n*!!m 9troue PeaLlr..pat project, Approral of nits wo" (f to carer the cost of ItmToral design o[ the eeqwim of • box culsort to"Ited to cc"Imte ty Caral#ln Strout raalltea*oc. L. OLoyard Arsaue 4*ito S*ret<eal Apprmtl of eaetr"t rlth C D Ltty*e"og to li.. cosDl*n "tbt ef. l a"alainea. railroad eeardiacim. Aed ya13n of the plap"d earrlcu� protect. L@#e "d apyrorel y ansnet vlth the City et Ontario for e4dlat '! .j -'r a.''. City Colaatl ROVLw MCOaMr 1, 1960 rase 1 (a) J. _, Ac"Ptooto of ,real )lap M. AOSt 4--' chat ComaLL adapt Ch. subject eq ubich eapsiats of four "",I, J'cand m the apse" side at AlveeO Str "c. Wt Of S'ppbiro. WmDROd M. 90-lot A 9150{OTION Or TR CRr C CYC32. Of R6 Cm 'tr4L NO W. 3505 CTD &Tzn PAZCArf1MC W So. 3"s). (!0) CLrL%G of ra[wi Mq M. 39122 Mrawd that Ceoveil author!" the City Sowed t ir'e -1' w Oita W rubjace ew. She sap cwatatt of four ",cats toa[Twtt career of itch Scroac 'd Ju "r Strut. rdtM== Soo go-tog A LUOLOl M ar TR CSR CCAw. or = Crrr of SAM® CV-LV CA. CALTIORIA. A"Wr= r=V- MP bCMM 3911 (TZNUTM !ASCII, W. 5911). 770'C nM" AGArltmrr. M IIVSOfD= "Cam. (ll) i t MA (it— u" r-gftd far lack of bac3q Lfarmam). (11) s. ARtevel of Cmtract Ste Mrrtcaa to MwhU b Coatocar T'[dsal ►actil for ebe ►wart Modal. tiu (13) P. Mt Mtauttar 17. 1990 for Public MarLaM w Esvirawcacal Aauasret lad 93aaaad 0.42"a ast M. 00-01 — Lowy. A rban" of coca rnwat few S•l -S w the surttewat waters d)bcmas aoddWLiao Ijoad#t�[�L�ru ixrtd 117 lot Cwahw darelapsept CmaJ@tLM Of lid d,attiat cola. An Iw0j 19237. (Sa) O, Mt DACeaMr 179 L$So far Publla baarty oft raatraerecal Aaa.•- ---t ad law ChAa" 110. 00-LS — Lffiark. A ehmq of two few Ml (LLtte alricul- Cort1) to 41 (no f"11y nald"tial) fee 11 car" locate at Of Mr716 aeecb of Ripos't'e. AN 101 -031 -71. (ls) P. Mt pcarbbor 37. 1900 far volle beertos m tL fubatrtatw 0dtwsca. (16) e• Auchoelutlm far Part -UWA Clark t7pLt fat 11a laeactty Mrrlcas MPatreact chrouSh Juta 30, loot. (17) V. Approval of rat3red try[ Cro"L9r t is ncesredad tbat commit appear A raaol'"m aatboriilw the savor to PotiHOaa subait"d by the Mllny lloro y- REJOWUX M. 00.110 A SUMMON 07 TEl CSR CMM M or T12 CM Or tAKW WCAHO CA. CAIAY MSA. AlPtprlMO A palli011 R TILE ArMI30N, TWESA AND SACRA R "SWAT C"AMr TO VRISTLOCT A SRS LIME An SS tE= STRR 1,013.3 = V[ST Or toomsm (l9) A. Auedret to city facility La"sr it to ntotaradd that Camcil teat, ear "A'* for wles A, 1. 41 'ad C4 for • tva -yur "Arse, taaclLaa Treat arrive at 7to9 p•s. Ibrlwt Mond by hid". "tad'd by ralw0o to Npr.n the Getaat CALAadar V3 -0. lt. the arc'ptl" of !t"'1' Vhich boa boom ris"w. MetLm "tried oice,c ualr a i�� ae pare 7 A'It, X-, • N '7• ML•l. Il7umy. � 9k lA. Ag OWNA.Ct akdmMO "Iff"C tfCMthTIM, Jerry Cnet. Bgildtg�- Offr�y"al. prssancd tha state to"". e t1s Cort11'o .eta cgec.ta with the ordtyora vge is Cbijta[,13, .Ut1oo 1603 r dutiep wit] roof mnrLfo !e hltk fin boaard aru•, t4. 0.•set upLiesa the �if M w me "Etsfled with the Cdegeitieaa ad ..tabad tto�btww the LttrrcoetfeUd r be coold rid tine for h{rglf. Mater sakad its City Clark to tad thl CLt1a of Ordtamce b. 571. City Clan 11u11t.es read the title. tbMger Mgr.• by Mike". n[mdd y thlahe to wive further rgedlU. Mat14g ""1, geW.gurly Sb. 01DrL 80. 173 (first rssdiel) AS =Mkx.t W tat CM Lam, Or TIM Clyy of RAMP IMCAMWA- CUMW]L. ADWTM in 1979 6'I = Curt. DltlrOOt Curt IM AIATEMM M a DAMMM WWD=. M"y 310 =j. =MM W=00 MUM CM9, AND d1WM ft== Cltt LUDAWI YD MUM Ca3A1t CSslit LIIttry nectsm To tar Lom CO more. Mayor lrhlesssr opes.d the rtifg for rebut b"riat. Address fei Ceuveil g.nr Mtwes Oa COMM, 3343 Las Lees. paudess. L .epletaed the dlff.rrscn to sl a, the ... A ad costs l typo Mile, rude". 4 said it wag get agtsss.q Clue C sbde rte Sot Jr. hilk fin board stall lieu 7w Wu pot a that n tap of A CLUB 1 type bass. Og VULts, STA. solid tha SLA ,,art, tb- w of fire ntardut typo rooftu ntertels L bilk tin buts .sue. - Of og6ge.td that to stage sMta .rh rtart.ls are ngoird that Co ewLi .1. reeetta "tnfitttgt. Jobs Lyra, foothill pin Dtstrlct bard M.sMr, Bald that s tile roof L very Mary M top of a burftet Most", "rer 11.trr kwtiao.d Sattlr 1110. ttha said bar bar red" . few rest aga that' plgeead to de tb..on Lb.relraa. She suntioed the gewHty of berme skis ioapeetad ass ob"lelsp pgraita sites this Wald add to the teat. Mr. Crest syl•Sed that Mss had twe required gd" the pngioge ce1u. ibia bad rt b.ae nUtn. Bsrrr a"41, Matins Corlast•ar. felt that these u Ud angled .ldply adA to the wt of tha %Doss. M lraran go wt gensuay fee 1113114 sold he dtff4rd with Mr. feyol sifts then gas a dttf•r•acd of about 73000 per 4"Lllet gdt Mtuen thew of shako wnu tile. Mayer Schloerr closed rho 14UD haarlgt star• than to m fer,g, targets. COBOWItUe Bridge .gid that perhaps as e."d to ter gay HM sossib si oolege far tUV< ateroto. K tioet M•rd by !.leeks. •atesdd by Bridle to cwtl," this 1t" to the Jsegery y, 1931 steel. {btlgo "nisd uAlmLa_•- 17 S-0. Mayor Sale ... r "tied s taw[ at a,LS p... no retie{ race,.." with all sensors et the Cgr u sed stait pru.gt. at BtaO 0 2✓ City Couacll mfoutu Oatrtae ), USO Part A (10)31. M02! fpmtSO OtDrytARQ AML17Itvtf domdrnta to w San ` S.tmrdw Ceuq Stet vas sod Smildled Ms."". u adopted by Ordinance b. 17. Staff neon pnteettd by urrr eau. Mr. Rope retuactd wt the P1mrd grelepoae`['action be referred back to w Ptaring COoolaalom for tataastdentim taw 41 -1 ed R- 10.000 aestog dtetrt'u. Alm. to add w gee pap 7 uhlch had em mt Wttad to Cowell prler to the otetlAs. fayar rotund the C197 Clock n red the title of the CrdiercA. city Clort Ona.cou'rued w t1w of Oc/WOCA ft. 123. OAODIUCL W. 123 (mcmd rudtes) Y CRDIRAM Of = C"T =wm Or lE Clry RtR[DUTfAL. N . fLAMW Dt7pD71mff. An Awlb'smA m gS:.•rlCa or m ummct tONM OIDRARa. ut f1 Ibwd by M"La. eemo/N y ra)o.ho to v " (otter r&.U.S. MLI. oam mou,17 34. " 7fu °heeirngotd rW {lot Im p.Allo htarint. lyn MtaS m'negrote. Cootruro Whole .aid be had mnrol rtcafteadatleeo for chant" w w ordtueta .hick tent Seim M) At"Ifory DW Pteattdl (1) Cunt {tome (bathroom pluebi s aely). (1) Stlrtta Sara" rith mp-- for o.else of A can. (1) Rpr occmatice punt,rt m ONtnascA 77 of w City of Raow (A) � atlas office W he located to • mobdlrl.tom, ace. to re.a1A the oar. :as 1(b) Aerumrf was Sonit"dl (1) )beta or' pre'"'A pac'erc ta lattice 61.014A(b) (c) Patti" e"gtlrmtat rmeeine tN tar. (t) Leading 1para SNOlretmtat rastlm th seas. (t) 11 �s Acted act t tom w tam. (')'rent faN Di're.ices of fatal anemias w .m. (b) :starter Sly T rd ' rastlas w teas. (L) Sur yard 4amaLog tetulo' w mar. U) Dfensre. Required{ ecee,a tin tam. ft) Side Tard ►maw rwm edldtept urr atlas the 'ey. (1) Cpce Span Spttiradl roo lm w dead.. Pap 17 W tb. uPllrut .ball obtain City Co U rpeenL for ..nbliebret of at uy &ftrsl A mocUtlam prior tow 40111st of ap lot of secupnq ?Sao 14 (6) (11m A at w Sa tlr) the City Co'o'p shall appnn. Adlt7. or dfeappror the sm. rbaede ad Drrtloprtt plan. Fat. 72 (Ian) Off -Sita partied yatiiltlau be Ctq u Plseasi my .utharin mt ran. them 10 porwt of tea reeulred Nrtia te• . mt ta h. ioesud ('am emit' the some) hgo 13 (A) tlth Its. — To &CM.t" wan per,caaa. the Plamoteg COM1.91an is '�eeered to n "— and 'valuate w sepltcebt. Ift. u...... !" to uch we eeb)aat to bmitoeeat &arts (rpt nulls the mein) a. 077 Pala 56 (yT) TM City Plarm.r r li rtotOlta a� Yteaeap to eoebl YtlTala,aad araleatimaof toe .5 �l^ gpuuuos by the Plaml.p femmi"ie., ?he WUllttp .bell sd by . !De uubush6d by lorl[ir `. of the City �aeti. 3; (3) detus by City Plae.eft .. Y� ,) (A) The City Plum ahaU review the ."U"ttee for i Dereleysebt 9ar1ee rmd .bell nfer aW 4 Ucatim to the tlrato9 CorLelw, al" vlth nu. et"lioY and r of aatod rluueo m. it Gwl• eitbu 30 dq. of Yt.pceero "oetc 9a.iew. ,r Cotdltces rT loolede, bot ahau rt be H i,oi to. nao(rerec. to "Oct.' yar". epee .Darn. boo w n. feo, v.11a. "I .rr.0latl [pot[rnta to[ lre.lta, ' ep[ mint*" d toe. of 1r1.rr7ir9 e eeYioe eeetr.l eeeauf.tt rp.1e0- veeta for .treat tgraneuu ed d"LutioY. r.aelttir of vohircl.r tatn....M.S...d trace Ureolauool n$w)ati. of Ug*el npLatdrm been - of or other rberee- terutlre of openttgl rpel[rYDn fot .etenetpte or 14014"PW ad ether i;rawratat .4[rmtuboo t el d9el°9vet tebadulas of cim ltd. for gft.tamce or } roeFl.tlas7 ad Other ate .dlttaea Y the City pleunar r7 dre .cetsa27 to i-- uap.tlblilty pith abrading yrl"m tM P,6ut hatith. Solely, and e.lfen. td ta eYbl the Pl -VAUS fooet"IM to eab. fidl.g* the rp.lyd by :active 63.0119($)9. - (t) Delete p.rwoo. rase "OU) T HIa� toe u$ cooed .hill ea. eh. folioed.$ fi.U.tt [let appcvrd per.o.bc to Drveloprec Pavt.vt (IA) Tee dectalw of ebe Plee.ie9 Coruru. 06011 be alfettin � IA tzl.Mar do" aft.r the deco of th[ druioo to".. to 4ypeol be. bass Mw vii, the City Co ,,, (IA) A decisfr of the pla.t.t C eieatoo oq be teyeelsd .Kula 16 r+l.dar days to the City C.wcu by the ePPLIroot of aey other y.`sob " Percribed is Uctlee 61.0151. (6t) A Derelopo,.t P.riew ee)reral sub)srt to ltyes ry be Te d by the ylralet Corisol" for to addltlentl Period of ao ysaq Provibd that peter to th. arptTltLM dal, a vrltt.e rpormt lee noweL le filed with he Plrmie9 CeaWalea. If the applltuto is tpyeeled to tbt City rouettl, it Y1 be e, Y tdod by tb. City Cooetu. peg* 19 (11) yho City Fl., aball mae " unatig*tloe of the YPlluttoe and Shelf Drapan .raper[ these. 061ch MALL be ar.ueble to ,he Ciy Y r C"oru and fiafa6 Cousioe ad to the 4PPltc"t prlr to the public Marty. 7490 30 ($G Th. P1ao.let Co.deat" ry $feet or door to appIluclee for $vowel. It roo A"llaup it ayp.eld to the City Ca cu. the City Cowell rp Veer of d4ay ee appliaa[loo for ra"val. ?-go 11 (III) Lt. 6 — within tr (7) weft" d. • follovli the data of a dec"t a of the Cortt4too rand" a 0a. Pecelt or laude, "4 darolopret Firm, tb. City plarm.r sh.0 tubtdt to the City Cowrtl Witt,* Ytita of tfu d.tulee. a. 077 A clty,cootu mitc., W.Ct 6 obr 3. fat 1960 tso pap 32,(l45) ippli-ti" for • CCdjtLCCCi V,.,p..dt Olth m "pitutift Code, fteforyeefly (Of & ChMOO le'lote bounda to Ofted -Forty. A)ectje tb* f" C,,Ucbj6 f r be iotlwim tm, Vu Farit Ced CC, , , - Of Oft a CoblItt.1 a CoPlitori-I r ij TM FICCOICLA C—Aselon ab'U MCC Cho P-611C boortog ca the orates Cod tbo COOdItIona, use Permit t,tb. Goom ".ties Me h"112,18- for It. purp,� of a" fttlft .tb@, "? the tee caeo".t." d-C,-IoC ca the cooiLtI.&I ;or., "to of the use be d---W to bl• 11114 SaCO " - t application shU M ""CoOre dM" tIt4tb="Ibt* Of OtAct000t by the City Coou M. sactift). ounlartom. (Delete the TOCCCWsr FASS 34 (33) The City FLOCCO, aL31 a. Ce ore tLutlov, of the 4"IL4"m "d se"i Pre'etr' 4 """ tNATCOO Chile ChOIL be avatiete to the "t? Cornell and FL-00tog C'e'""Ce Me to It' -IPII--t pri., m the pubLie beanies. FsS* 34 00 ltd... it ap," " or domy, on -vPILcCZLvCb* City te�- tbo city Qna Coy pmt fa nafti. (10 ItLtbin m (3) vare", da"'fousmim the dats of • derist" of the CO'Cot"Ce r"Ok"S ' fe"Coo4- tbO City fleater sb&U it .. Idt 0 tea City C-=U wrIttee potift CC it, d&ctmim. (net of robot. the COCO). C.ttlft Pop 37 cu,m De"t. te, mum Pop 3s (33) TM City Fleeter Chou MGM C, CC the Le UCthft anshell ►"PtIl * "fart Mrsm WCA "Au be •va"M o t City C—u so' Pleasies c000ttaim WA ro, tu 74LLG huriag. grtlemt 'cior to tu tlq U efur M me" proMT17 ftem.". " th.. at.= .Os C, =Cf, CC "Ue b."Ut ob.U=to the alterearet it Y. Curb the M.M.2 CoOtt.sim 0 caeal"r. PW H (TA) LLM 14 — 7M Comb( "I -"if? - fl-Cowdtiva of the rimieg Coe tissLoo Ce 4 MD" at ch"46 Cod "? rKmOt Capon WA coolidr . C of the C000i`4iod 02 the ftdificaUft. "(lore of fee COOILLSIMS to Tryon elthis 30 days after ru"Pt of the C&OCtu l•qC40t Mall be doomed C—c,,-- ?&,"be M*=*.w cm Ctu"j" &COCCO Ce Me 'a of the ftaterme, 04 pe's 10& 34ct"o (b)(2) ' r"C'o th"POCLU" doebAtIes by Sol. tbm &&C SGCUM (3) — "Reaus adjostmont. -b.QU be da.rmi." aM My"" by the Piamiag romtmsjw to City COOCJI.. ■ - oacwer ]: 190 •• i fate 4, roel", Mo"d by Mae", tteoodtd by 9aloobt to tin Lena ndu , .. No- 123 Ha the tout end lenp,cp eLayu se "W"efi b a to thdutou AM htrslf cod u ear seso" "US foe Jsoee 7 C --Neon blab ' 5.0. 4 7. 1961. Motion urrted wto! ®al y.. a-le ■ J ][. ZOBB tAl.ICf tNOLRr tttLtirrs.T inff LeLrT eot+e. resort tnuotd be We '. "SLato[ Cloy V.e,seer. Jls tutlaem, tend the LLtla of ordlooro M. 113. rotten ros�aidos ly ""'A" bf Bridle to rein fertber 5-0.. reeding. mtim ucrt" =MUM 0. 111 ("toed 1"Ung) AS Ommum m M CtTT macm or m Cl2f ar y t�. BABaO CU-- Olcrl. tlLSTNAA. RUCISM ASSESSOR'! fYCTt, MOZZ 207 - ESA -49-0 Met e.1 m M7 "I 200 = MUTE ESM of ro0rlmL BOOL%YAm Vf3T "" ATIMM �. ti Schlosser o9e o,c eba seetiot for PoblLC bearlu. Then beers as reseooee. bawl- r" r2oeel. i e C`s.OelLdssl fnse settees" t e 1- -y told It be ep tM es poorl t-7 em,ld M eetPattels HN the t-1K e" felt ehr [rtes the tope sop eye me ePPeopruu. ' �0e -AI aloe gmmse q t ra aor the tnffla fees off Biter mts rmtuu F. ! etiss" Mss" by fret to At" the some [Mop r"o"t. for leek of a "rood the at1". rotim, Meted " acid" "met" by falmb b apron the m roam cue . - *.east. utrted by tba fOUselet rout AYES, Tales -, BrLd Bsblo"ar. tOtlt fro". AESESft Ooae. AESL20m, M gists. .,.-. ld ItlteL s>ae"e" nt Bide M ebstelmd elms Me boo r" is the Heiaetf. 1P• fps[ ttA� -+ rna...T VD p.te DS9rlttnm A save; t lead lo"[" w [M meth"[[ terser or beset Lime and rcMbb refees for 16 Berea (SI ('kyle f—UT credu,t"l) u H (adalaLtntt Arcbebala fete i(.I fort/ r":doet'" An 201 - )Bldg. 21. reynf"eimel) e" R -] (mltlple Bet". ad SS. tuff n9on Prasoud by Beer] Cep Citrk Warrsm rs" tiLL of osdlsaoq 00. ii{. room, tiered by Mikele. seteeted D7 hlmbs u rain [ortMe se"ut, rotlon resoled oeraisseell 3-0 Ommla b. IS{ ("co" rodtep AS an's -mi of TEE cm COUNCI1. or TR CUT of BAOCeD CXA MCA. GLITOINA. RBZORM ASSUMIS ?A'= m - 201- 161 -15. 21, Am 22. Mafor ichlseear "Good the o"ttob for Palle he +r W. Addnuty famril vu, 1tr. A. 0.81" Vrtew. 7074 tone Areo". n" a letter rhtch be had east to Mr. Va eases emyse"ty hu ep9ealtim to Ne pme tbeete, d neemeMed [bee • rdteal fsetltp M tout" on thu lsvatolsr pteu or protorty. rhea toted m fortMr Palle towesat. Moyer Sale-ter closed the palie hasten{. �1ayE "Ri , ^^l..��:a`t':.i✓"'t= ;s�-�P 1 %.7 `.a? r i ,t ..v,• ViCtgt�C&umclL Mmuns .eDeeeam, 7.`1960 rl � .� *+.ata•P �r '.p JI ' ,btlmS K"ad by rnn. oecmtad by glkels to app[arm the lem chAege,mA - 1 . Onl506ae go, 116. Xotim "tried uamAPOWl7 3-0. , (22) wi S0 10 - psi . 'A am- thma rgoest true W ta G -1 ' q atnt at la0d taG mn61 of Artso :LIAt T. Wt of Archibald Amapa at the eacten taraimu of 4riaa and rlaear Street,. ASS 106 - 111 -01. Staff rapt pnaavrd by $arty brae. Daput7 City Clerk tararir AarLelot red title of Ordinance M. 117. littlest Nord by Kikels, uemded by lalolo ta vairs further reading, brim "nitd Waamuslr 7 -0. tRCII1AK9 SD. 111 (need nAdiag) Ag OCSOYSCZ or TU Ctu COC9ca Or SC C1SS Or AAgtaS CUCAMI A. alavmA. 1aa1eD MESIOa•A PALCC, SC100 106-111 -01 A= g -g 1O A -1 LOWO w TO t@i1 2=9 OFAMW SICIDIAr Arm AM OF ASCRISAW Arr4S. brae Sebleuer opmad the WoUN tot Public herring. Shen heing m irepeeae. Cho b"rty au closed. ffittmt Nerd b7 trap, mccded by ralolo to apprvre the awe Ch"go, red Ordlaavice b. 111. Ifitim carried mialsoriS 74. (11) AT. nygnmmttl ASSISOM W. Cm MD. gpefer Y eNLteaee ease' ngnle..... of the lotion ed rorsm of IS bwlousee to Mal gtmral r in"S district., Sndf rayon Presented y W. Vumrr. ` City Clark OAAeaere cast title of Or4LWm* b. 434. arum, brad by Mole. secoad" by Arid" to oolre fartbai tutted. Milos carried man"eaaly 3-0. CtO1gAiCZ W. 45-0 (termd tesdiap) AN Ot01PAOCZ OF FKA CIS{ COOKIE OF ffi Crrf Or LIS= tmUomt;;A. CAL%pv,=. nrA1Lr7NW RECD :7100 FOt CIA locam Am gr7IN w A0m.7 ICSVIZSSi1 131 fIS 61 tC?WAL NIEVESS) OIZOICf. Myer Sebloeaer pWad the snt"g for pubtle bearing. then halt, m ns sae.. the hearing use e!naed. betaal tarred y ►nn. wended by Mk.ie to sppten Otdleuee b. AS{. The mein elerid omimvlr S.O. (24) 70. ASOQ IN b. 1 10 tJaDTftPZ gISV.'C4SO[ DLnTCf W. t rA !!ASS Ms. 7116, 971), 9a N. ARO 9)d7. Start sport Pnaretd y extra SS00a._ Myor Schlosser spend the acetic{ for p,bLi, mate. Sean being meat the Ppblte por l" sea closed. City Cowell 3ttauna 0at.aber 3. 1900 + r h0o y )ouw' [tend by Meta. tatow"d by Pat,*. tea _ - :'. ad to W"we tact". ndl ". r"u. tried go'"ton, 0ualetiao b. 806111 :1 Wanttue'rtd tltL. of ftmlutlm MCA 00 -111.. 'O.1? Y0. City Clark .ffO=cu PD. 80 -111 A ST.9CUMOR C► Tn CM OMMLL Of Tn CIrT Of OAfCW CC vn". CAtMIWA. OtMISC M U rA C OWM. LCK f.�j2t.A�9tU n MRSOU 1 1 3 � Notes. �4 TOM TS tot NM nuaa. Staff nfon Dra- (13 i The C!" had remind m 2"W far m gDtTS.O Srn itmT.3 ht.tt u rare. that•° uvt"" ad paha [Tau IentN .c 0330 9BII a Anew. Mr. t b0 raid that two ltenn t>artatty b.m m- effmitiw m the ral of W cnu bad i� ulwd by the Cie,?. ua ""a' hhtoet•er OPm.d the antlot fa[ ?Wtia hoot]". Om OrttT..Netklai !er hie, ha is fewer o[ hce too the trn room" rqy' �mi at We B.11awa Awoa., clot° Bo bb term the, ttryOttt nc l- nakis is famr of nufcl" tho nom td the t ratil" .beet dtlr1A0 the [star .aueo. Thars b" So pbuc genies oft then few the mdttace, htryoT BNhatmr eis.d the 5 � Hlo �e3�ta�uM that It wmU M a trim m city[ tYllua Awy :) m? that tbtf me plmtat"is m meat w thefcity. w tnt L clam and ua Notice' N"nd by Bridm ..etw0d b? Mesh. to ncais the ceme, ad it", ce bllMt Ateoee and to swta'a tba OFFS". This Is to M • Prac.dmt met of 6flam A"aa O Alm. u bane a Lim att"I met farcical." Pieta of ?rover? a °der to Intact the future, lotto, t e[ the, pro""" e, !' N. tithe INUaa t.trhad ti...W.l? N. N"far Sthloteer Called a race, at 10'43 , The wt ataer[nad at lh'00 M. with all otabors of the Cowen M staff f"not. C P. 4. ran wrwenna.. — — I &A._ A"M O/ 0Mtt30P r . rM � Sly Q"M SM? ST". (SN dryer SNIO.e,u inked Mrs. foftett to tees "cads L mid her i[ tha hm m1 futrrytftt w th • "tut to the cuff raeeseesttSao. She .u[d LWn vu NCae the eft ewHnttw .,, Tip would b. wllli" to SPlit the ties with 1 MIN void Srnt thu M' m ace,., After aeet dtscoom b? the Cauactl. the fe11.H" mtlta woo aa4' Mettw' Mowed b? ?e10a0oe Satmdd by M "I. to .flew the M,ffstm alghum cads (lust 1901) to mince the td JUL' Coffee SheY alge. hotlw Paced by the /ellwgo0 cent AY13' ML6le. ,L,.b.. Bridge. m, tCbletu.. t AUDI' Mme. ?Cost SAU he ",ea.4 this bateues he felt we obw Igtl' ine[. rd POZ33 veto am wo Ordtvmte ad act& this eta ocathe,. aye h" 10 (27) ±l, OMTAA20 Ct00YT ACCL2f Ste, Staff rapart preoeo'd ! r Ligd Sabb'. llettaat Mooed Y M ULs, y robe to f ae"odd Cal Nptese the alLayetee of 25.000 u wr recce• sSt" .ogre the !or'a'ted feet Of tbo mtrut tar tbs Y�I 0aur,, Gteame Access Stu". 7bo 'cosset to M alloy,,/ t latL" etWy Cued. Mpt'm'=ft" � � •- •--ly 3-0, tat tL Poblte ctt<w (213 dC ADIfTOf{ fif!Y79ntrt ncwMrDAnO� flc'fD[Kl m neoa , i ttrecrttrr. f�repptf pta'eaty y J1e A"feaM. M +. Rule, rta� ter tL i.' kyrio lbyn Soot to cL�i utt ath tabor, . a • Iuyr i [tetra aft. W ayptd. The Lt �gMafs"poa l osell'fye W 411'U tM" T1" rat tad atyLaeul7 aoppen y ati Adrlsen CaWlouee. lL Costa. ttlaad' roatdtar. em"tod that the CLt) Ceoo u bat. by iv"leee L the Central flan prate',. Y eats the Co.l"tw by bey bMelnt tDpttt few the cStLUa, ha detlatCy ua eater aWa. DM Wr. AS""" Cosot'tiwrr JOM Can Ltle. M •llllle.et Fire Dlstrict BM,4 Mrlar r"ev"yrire Gloss rtmabea, m m"s row—, Uab' La/'. mtveada roaLd"t Attu burly the rare, taw the aoflaate. the at the Mott'. , M'Ar elaasd the rblia MmLw ' fee t'1 —s S Lice ea Lis- lt" MW abaad My the elaeud caM.tel" aW tie they 1''117 CSOU Mt be ooporetd. t"Mooss"U e W p"tp"a the d y ltlbela wL7an fLv"d n Catrt" I. nou11981, At that a!" y y� l arty C°MMlty amyl 3-0. yen w retnre to the Mer'1 rector iciedul�. XotlM 1maNea raoe'll"M Mmula "" be W "W to e" the CtMral r2an coy y tba tovoall 1. Fbre,r7. Cartes! moet¢rd. Wf2d lWb '4FCLf. Syrt saps[[ by �i1M ftbl' d,,cyeLor, l[ few tM Co=CIL able 'tut be b'd an eap1o7ar Merlwt Morse by )ttW1a. owmw.d y Faobo lo to wtbor"a staff " rep „"a flea aw: "tartWo c tn'ta L” d"L" "tole" tort 1. CA Crtrc "LLutfne pnpardtim end u "[ha peN! "rice vlti L.O. "[hated bullet of 13.000. =LOS at 7. 71CLarla eetlsuae aad Tb.d "t ent er 7 r!'ta DyluA' Aea1Pla I`W- With L.D. mat at u !.000. t M r t >s ass, I r- !' „�Tkwa,....<i . <_rte. er sit Wm.e.. Fs 7.'^Drtatlad Ctiedatim plaentaS W Cuiso review for Carrtsl floe ., 1� V[Ctortas Tom Vistas Idartrial Specific 11” Feim Oil Mtoetstn'? 't"� or as urim N td Sdt at 110.000. _. '•wi3 TIT a 1. Mast tesssg fe,ttn irrdces for Oros Arsaae. Marled Amon.,'ta� Gems hook SritNs oad ethers Fexth Assoetstss rattiest, at u - -' uttmaf,FaSNC of SU.No. . _ _ man:ass. carri" A I tit rost. g ratan ATltit IWaLs ['Phobos seSAN, rd Schloanr. Is1Yt Vass. Aif[s[t hoer. - j. MIT ATMOIT'f t 1.M t. ifun Fear[ mar. n 5. fRTCIL 14STRr. Than wt, Pews 7. A070W1mT. I ottaat Nw d by }aloha. "ends_ i7 ttitals to al7cara n u Oucatlrr 4srlanr mt ta rseeOwu this oosatys Wt to remasru as umdrr 11. at 7100 p•a. for a spatial Yrasumt District rrat"S at Licata het Caumait7 Cntar. Its Vedas aUrssrad at 1137 A.U. "Fretta117t.sala.tmd. SLY \ \++Ati�'asil�a.�it,YY S4rarl7 Aathalet D epaq City Clsrk •F .' to S h S .7 1 .M1+ Motion: Moved Division the sal brought back to the following /y� AYES: OMM: COIMMISSIONERS: COITiISSIORERS: seconded by Arner to recommend to the Planning ree and if there is proposed removal, for it to be c Preservat.on Commission. The motion carried by BANKS, ARNER, SCHMIDT. BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, COOPER NONE STAM9M -- cerried B. A PROPOSAL TO AiSTORTC— 7V RONDA. — Arlene Banks presented the statr report. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Frank Green, 7156 Hellman Avenue, is concerned with the hazard to traffic. He stated that the trees are difficult to live with and dirty, and that if the trees are to be preserved, then the City should maintain them. He stated his opposition to Point of Historic Interest designation. Howard Murray, 7178 Hellman, said he thought the trees are Important and he was in favor of preserving them. George Betzler, 7275 Hellman, stated that he was in favor of the removal and replacement of the trees and widening both sides of the street. Marvin Billings, 7137 Hellman Avenue, stated he would like equal setbacks an both sides of Hellman. HPC Minutes -3- September 1, 1988 D- / °E` i Motion: Moved by Banks, seconded by Cooper to deny the proposal t esignate the Powelson- Beckley House, 10213 19th Street, Rancho Cucamon as either a Historic Landmark or Point of Historic Interest. The mot carried by the followtng vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: OANCS, COOPER, SCHMID BILLINGS NOES: COMMISSIONERS: HASKVITZ, ARNER - ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ST� -- carried w s t s Motion: Moved Division the sal brought back to the following /y� AYES: OMM: COIMMISSIONERS: COITiISSIORERS: seconded by Arner to recommend to the Planning ree and if there is proposed removal, for it to be c Preservat.on Commission. The motion carried by BANKS, ARNER, SCHMIDT. BILLINGS, HASKVITZ, COOPER NONE STAM9M -- cerried B. A PROPOSAL TO AiSTORTC— 7V RONDA. — Arlene Banks presented the statr report. Chairman Schmidt opened the public hearing. Frank Green, 7156 Hellman Avenue, is concerned with the hazard to traffic. He stated that the trees are difficult to live with and dirty, and that if the trees are to be preserved, then the City should maintain them. He stated his opposition to Point of Historic Interest designation. Howard Murray, 7178 Hellman, said he thought the trees are Important and he was in favor of preserving them. George Betzler, 7275 Hellman, stated that he was in favor of the removal and replacement of the trees and widening both sides of the street. Marvin Billings, 7137 Hellman Avenue, stated he would like equal setbacks an both sides of Hellman. HPC Minutes -3- September 1, 1988 D- / °E` IN .'Y✓' � 'NyV'e F�uY' {� \t^`jY° y •M? +'i i'.� -- _.nR. -n .�°h'\xx M Merle Hurtzberger; 7202+ Hellman Avenue, said she thought the trees are < >< beautiful and stated her opposition to their removal: Bob Kerpf, 7108 that man, stated he was neither ir. favor or against the removal', " pe the trees, that his concern was the rock wall on the north side of his'` property. - Hearing no further public cement. the hearing wcs closed. CO missimner Banks stated that the trees are aestheticrlly 'pleasing. She stated that the Commission may need more information from Enginee ring Larry Henderson, Senior Planner, stated that the only issue the Historic Preservation Commission is deciding on is stated that 11 the fo if th2 trees are significant. He mmission decided that the trees were not historically signtficant, the Commission could still send a message to the City Council that the Commission would still like it to have a Special Street Designation for improvemu:nts with the replanting of large trees, i.e, specimen size trees. Commissioner Billings stated that these are newer trees than some to the City. Commisstoner Banks stated that there is not a clear cut issue of owner consent due to not dealing with one owner. Motion: Hdved by Naskvitz, seconded by Billings to deny a proposal to designate the Hellman Avenue Windrow as a Historic Landmark or Point of Historic Interest, but direct the Engineering Department if there is removal of the trees due to street widening that they be replaced with specimen size trees by designating the street as a Special Design Street. The motion not carried by the following vote: AYES: C"ISSIONERS: HASKYITZ, BILLINGS, SCHMIDT NOES: CaWSSIONERS: ARNER, COOPER, BANKS ABSENT: C%HISSLONERS: STAHM - -not carried Motion: Moved by Amer, seconded by Cooper, to recommend to the City Council the designation of the Hellman Avenue Windrow as a Point of Historic Interest with the reconaendatfon of designation as a Special Design Street, The motion zarrfed by the following vote: AYES: COMIISSIONERS: ARNER, COOPER, BANKS, BILLINGS, SCMIIDT NOES: COMMISSICNERS: RAS!KVITZ ABSENT: C"ISSIONERS: STAN -- carried HPC Minutes -4- September 1, 1988 City of Rancho Cutamdsp Application for ' HISTORIC LANDRARZ DESIGNATION HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST DESIMAT_ON 81atorle Landmark '",L Hl storic point of Interest IDENTIFICATION 1. Common Naas s_ V e i /MA n i4mm e /a / [ /Ma) 7 Historic Naas. It knowaa �. 3. Street or Rural lAdraaes-M a &se Ln,r. Sou of Lt ,fand,4_ , City$_ R. 0 Zips / 70/ county:.Sen '7• .A sor's parcel ao492a:. SiS y.+ttaeae, L Legal Descriptions _ i� s. prrasnt Owner. It known: racy B.O. tV Addreswc k; City: e•C ZS a 9190 — Ownership in privet public e G 1p' S. Present Oast S{ Original Bass- .j A-ir .^, Other past uun hers DCSCRIPTION 6 Briefly deserit•e the present gbysloal • arance of the site or structure and describe any na or alterations rm its original conditions A rntw �rdr trf -H}r• strre.fi. T,. t�y�r -r1.�- tY(-w.t� 7 Location sketch Map (draw A label S. Approximate property sizes site and surrounding streets, Ent 91a (!o feet) roads, and prominent leadmarks)s Frontage Depth o approx. acreage rnda B. Coodlrions (check one) a. Facs d. D b Good G. Fair_ d. Deteriorated_ /~ a No longer in existence_ 10 Is the features a. Alteredt-941U/ b Unaltered? \ C . 1t rurroundingat (check more than W one if necessary) tE, a. Open land z b. Residential ✓ v. Scattered buildings__ d. Deansly built -up ✓ Base L,'ne e. Commercial I. Industrial g. Other l N k -P20, ,` y. 9: RESOLUTION NO. 57 ti A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO `S CUCAY,ONGA, CALIF(RNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE HELLMAN AVENUE WINDROW LOCATED NORTH OF BASE LINE, SUUTH OF LA RONDA AS A POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST till WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing to consider all c=uents on the proposed Point of ,. Historic Interest Designation and issue8 Resolution No. 88- recommending to + this C{tv Council that sat! point of His Interest Designation be approved. s' HHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input regarding said Point of Historic Interest Designation. S WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. i s NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows: SECTION I: The application applies to property located :n the City's right -of -way. SECTION II: The proposed Point of Historic Interest meets the following crTferTa established in Chapter 2.24.090 of the Rancho Cucamonga t Municipal Code: A. Historical and Cultural Sialficance: 1. The proposed point of historic interest is particularly representative of an historical period and way of life. 2. The proposed point of historic interest is connected with a Lusiness and use which was once common but is now rare. B Historic Architectural and Engineering Significance: 1. The overall effect of the design of the proposed point of interest is beautiful. C. Neigghborhood and Geographic Setting: 1. The proposed point of interest materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. 2. The proposed point of historic interest represents an established and familiar visual feature of the copnunity. SECTION III: Designation of a Point of Historic Intewdst is exempt from CEQA TAFEfcre—T9. Section 15308) SECTION IV: Based on the substantial evidence received and reviewed by this COUn 71—nT based on the findings set forth 04ve, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council does hereby approve designation of the Hellman Avenue Windrow as a Point 0f Historic Interest. �N1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: Mayor and Hembers of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: THOMAS HOUSE STATUS REPORT I. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recomenda that the City Council receive the omas use report and take into consideration the Historic Presery ation Ccomission's dzsire to find a new location for this structure by directing staff to advertise the house for sale once all plans for a rcw use on the lot are approved. Staff further recommends that if the hu:se is to be demolished, that staff be directed to document the structGmro with black and white photographs of the interior and exterior and with a plan view of the house. I1. BACKGROUND: The City Council considered this item at its September 7 991- meeting. The Council referred the recouendation for landmark designation back to the Historic Preservation Commission for further review because of new information that the house would not be moved to the Thomas Plaza. The Council requested a status report if the recommendation were changed. At the time the Commission made its recommendation, it seemed likely that the house would be moved. However, after the Comission made its decision, staff learned that the project contractor thought that moving the house would be too expensive, that It did not have sufficient architectural detail to warrant the expense, and finally that the house would contribute to a parking shortage and therefore could not be moved to the site under any circumstances. The Commission had also recommended to the Planning Commission that the conditions for a proposed office Project for this site include the developer making a good faith effort to have the house moved, and if no one wants to move it, that it not be demolished until the developer documents the house with a plan view and photographs, and that a demolition permit not be issued until a letter to the City Planner is received which indicates financial backing for the project to avoid having it demolished and nothing built in its place. The Planning Comission voted to impose the conditions only if the City Council designated the house as a landmark. M V, 4 CITY CWWCIL:,MA4,�' iEP6kT) THOOM 'October;-19,�J998',r01 Page 2' 111. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: The Hfitoric Preseriati6n- GOMMIsslOn ' vOttd..11-u,-- J: absent..,not to 'recommend -landmark designation becausi...,Iacking-owner'consent, thi, building did.-not meet all (of,"the•'criteMs, ln,.the' 'new owner : consint—.pol icy:.,-" The Commission agre'ed:.'-?that.' 'designation '-would tect-'_the building. The, Commission,; feel .that; house , had F 94at historical value because members of the4homas family-had lived, In it for-40 years;: from the.'192Vs to the 1960's*,' and-wanted.,�16 sea 4. the house' preserved- if.-'poisible.-- TWCoamisslon -also inclided In their motion to ietain' the house 06, the.;l Ist of potential landmarks in the event that W-house is moved, and a new owner in the futarel is interested In"preserving*this Potential landmark. Re full f t t', BI �N City anner City an"r BB.*AB:mlg Attachments: A. Memorandum to Planning Commission B. City Council Staff Report of August 17 and all , attachments C. October 6 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report D. Historic Preservation Commission Mnutes of October 6, 1 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: CITY OF RANCiIO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM September 1, 1988 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Chairv,:n and Members of the Historic Preservation Comission Arlene Banks, Associate Planner M SUBJECT: THOMAS HOUSE SITE, 7980 VINEYARD AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA (OR 88 -I') I. BACKGROUND: A. Pur ase: The purpose of this Memorandum is to explain the reason ng behind the recommendations to the Planning Comisston from the Historic Preservation Commission regarding the site of the Thomas House. Attached are the Historic Preservation Commission and City Council Staff reports as well as the Archeological Resource Review from the Archeological Information Center. S. Recommendation for Landmark Desi nation: The consultant who con c e a survey o s r ca resources in 1987 listed the house as having local, county and state significance, and the City's "Designated and Potential Historical Site List" Indicates that it has potential National Register status. The consultants determined that the house is significant because it was built and owned by the Thomas family, obviously a family of local historical importance. The house was scheduled to be considered for landmark designation at a later date but was taken out of sequence because of the proposal to build an office building on the site. In determining historical significance, the Historic Preservation Commission considers the information in -the historical survey that staff has developed against criteria listed in the Historic Preservation Ordinance. The house was recommended for landmark status because of the importance of the Thomas family and because there was a possibility that it could be moved onto the site of the Thomas Plaza. Landmark status would mean involvement by Historic Preservation Commission in the review of the new site and the rehabilitation of the building. C. Recommendations to the Plarnin Comisston re_ 9arding Moving e moue that a project under consideration will not have an adverse impact on the environment. The "environment' includes ON' DA9 v THOMAS HOUSE September 1, 1988 Page 2 historically significant buildings. (CEQA, Appendix. G Significant Effects, •A project will normally have a significant effect an the envirorment if it will:.... (j) disrupt or adversely affect a prehistoric or historic archeological site or a propart/ of historic or cultural significance to a community or ethnic o; social group...'; and CEQA, Environmental Checklist, Ii 2o. If a project may have an adverse effect, either an EIR must be prepared which, among other things, considers feasible alternatives, or a mitigated negative declaration is issued which satisfactorily mitigates the adverse impact. The conditions that a good faith effort be made to move the building and an amount equal to the cost of demolition be contributed toward the moving of the building appeared to be appropriate mitigations. (A'; the time these conditions were written, there seemed to be a good chance that the house would be moved to the Thomas Plaza). D. Conditions for Demolition royal: The condition about ocumen ng u ng s to be demolished was proposed as a mitigation because of the importance of the Thomas family to this community. Documentation consists of black and white 35 ms photographs of all elevations of the building and the garage, a site plan, and plan view of the house. This information is placed in the Historic Preservation Commission files along with historical information, to be used as a community resource and for future histortans. The condition of not demolishing the building until a letter regarding financial ability to undertake the development is presented came from the experience with the Klusman House which was demolished and nothing developed in its place. The reaction to that unfortunate circumstance was that it should The Historic Preservation understands thatnnot everything can be saved. but itoat least wants assurance that as much of the City's heritage as possible is kept and that something good is replacing the historical buildings that are lost. Condition Re ardin tha Reed to h , odre Acheolo ica l urve po e Its tlt env ronmen a Crcnqu uct an c eps archeological iIad reenylearnedthatthestateAcheoogicalnformation Center at the San Bernardino County Museum is available to do reviews for CEQA purposes, giving their professional opinion on the need for further archeological work on sites proposed dC// Y✓ v' w ti for development. This project was one of two that staff sent to the Center as a demonstration, at no'charge of the services it has- toioffer. The report, indicated, among other things, that the potential for, the pressnce'of archeoloylcal' resources was unknown and therefore a field monnaissance survey should be done and appropriate mitigation rxasures should be proposed based on the findings. Therefore,- staff, proposed an archeological survey. The report indicated that an envfronmentcl impact -review shouldi be prepared, but staff thought that a condition prescribing a reconnaissance and follow -up was sufficient. II. CONCLUSION: In the future, Historic Preservation Commission staff reports and other back -up material will be forwarded to the Planning Commission whenever there are recommmendations from the Historic Preservation Commission to the Planning Commission• and the Historic Preservation Commission will keep the Planning Commission infortmed about its on -going art lvlties. In this way. the Historic Preservation Commission hopes to improve its communication with the Planning Commission. BB:mlg cc: City Attorney Historic Preservation ComrAission Lester Ross, Archeological Information Center Brad Buller Larry Henderson Chris Nestman City Council Ed Combs Attachments: A: Historic Preservation Commission and City Council Staff Reports on the Thomas House 8: Archeological Information Center Report 2�9 a- 1: I al THM HOUSE ti September 1, 1988 Page 3 Y✓ v' w ti for development. This project was one of two that staff sent to the Center as a demonstration, at no'charge of the services it has- toioffer. The report, indicated, among other things, that the potential for, the pressnce'of archeoloylcal' resources was unknown and therefore a field monnaissance survey should be done and appropriate mitigation rxasures should be proposed based on the findings. Therefore,- staff, proposed an archeological survey. The report indicated that an envfronmentcl impact -review shouldi be prepared, but staff thought that a condition prescribing a reconnaissance and follow -up was sufficient. II. CONCLUSION: In the future, Historic Preservation Commission staff reports and other back -up material will be forwarded to the Planning Commission whenever there are recommmendations from the Historic Preservation Commission to the Planning Commission• and the Historic Preservation Commission will keep the Planning Commission infortmed about its on -going art lvlties. In this way. the Historic Preservation Commission hopes to improve its communication with the Planning Commission. BB:mlg cc: City Attorney Historic Preservation ComrAission Lester Ross, Archeological Information Center Brad Buller Larry Henderson Chris Nestman City Council Ed Combs Attachments: A: Historic Preservation Commission and City Council Staff Reports on the Thomas House 8: Archeological Information Center Report 2�9 a- 1: I CITY OF RANCHO CUC.IMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 6, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJEST: RECONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION OF THE THOMAS HOUSE, 7980 VINEYARD, RANCHO CUCA140WA - APR: 207 -102 -09 I. BACKGROUND: On July 7, 1988, the Historic Preservation Commission vo e - , 2 members absent, to recommend to the City Council designation of the Thomas House as a landmark. The main reasons for the recommendation were that the house was built by and lived In by members of the well -known Thomas folly, and It is an example of a modest and simple 2920's California bungalow that has not been remodeled. The Thous family owned and ran the most notable and historic winery In the area, and were influential in organizing the local grape and wine industries. The PlanningtoCommission i rvthat they Commission a proposed office building on the site with provisions to help preserve the house. The conditions were that the house be moved to a suitable location and an amount equal to the cost of demolition be used to help finance the move. If, after a good faith effort to move the house, no one comes forward who wants to move it, a permit for demolition should not be issued until building permits are ready to be issued and a letter is received by the City Planner avoidnwhatghappened in to lthefor Kiusmathe npHou e) Another has secured su suggested condition was that the house be documented with a floor plan made of the house and photographs. (See September I Memorandum to the Planning Commission). The Planning Commission recommended that these provisions apply only if the City Council designates the house a landmark. At the time that the Historic Preservation Commission made its recommendation, it appeared that there was a good chance that the house would be moved across the street to the site of the Thomas y) Plaza. Since that time, the Thomas Plaza engineer a ,Cu HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT THOMAS HOUSE October 6, 1988 Page 2 evaluated the situation in more detail and advised the project manager not to move the house because it was too expensive, indicating it would be cheaper to build a replica than to move the Hoving theeihouse also could ontributeatoya hparking shortage. The lack of any special architectural details of interest also contributed to the decision not to move the house. Staff has not received any figures on the estimated costs of moving (and rebuilding the foundation and porch, which is also rock), but consideration of this was not a requirement of the Thomas Plaza project. II. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: The City Council considered the landmark Eds Cnaebs had reques�era7.contluuuaatioo afro after the August H17 meetfn9. The three Council members that were present voted to send the ttae back to the Cooission for reconsideration in light of the new information that the house *cannot be moved'. Council members also expressed the opinion that the fact of ownership by a well known family was not enough to warrant designation, that a landmark should be the site of an important event or a place that was well known to the public and contributed to the development of the community, such as the winery itself. The Council asked to receive a status report if the commission changes its recommendation, or to have the matter brought back if the Commission wants to keep the recommendation. III. OWNER CONSENT: Mr. Combs had expressed the opinion that he did not wan o o anything that would cost him any extra time or money, and since landmark designation would mean that he would have to spend some of both (trying to find a mover and documenting the house), he could be said to oppose designation. However, at the designation really meeting, and 0sob was said not sure i whether or not wbat opposes it. If we can designation because of his Opposition to obstacles stopdevelopingaan office project on the site, we may consider whether the house meets the owner objection override polity 'tests' discussed at the last Historic Preservation Commission meeting. They are as follows (not final wording): A. Has the propa.ty been identified as having potential national and /or state register status and does it stand out as having special architectural and /or historical significance? and d / / HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT THOMAS HORSE October 6, 1988 Page 3 B. Could designation help to protect the structure? Response to A: (1.) The consultant evaluated the structure as having potential local, County and State (not national) significance. (2.) It does not stand out as having special architectural impor`ance, and (3.) Whether it stands out as having special historic significance is a debatable point. There are few necks as important to our local history and as well recognized in the community as Thomas. The family built and owned the house. Members of the family lived in it for forty Years. Therefore, the property does stand out as having some special historic significance. Response to B: In staffs opinion designation will probably not help to Protect the structure. This was acknowledged in the recommended conditions which assured at best the Louse will be moved, at worst it will be demolished and pictures taken. It should be noted here that at the Council meeting the discussion included the phrase 'the house cannot be moved', which is not quite accurate because Just about anything can bs moved, but the likelihood is small that it will be moved. If the Thocas Plaza did not find it to be cost effective, it is doubtful that someone else will. However, if the office protect is not built and the house is maintained and not left vacant, it could conceivably be incorporated into a master planned development for the whole block. Staff, therefore, would recommend that if the Commission decides not to recommend designation as a landmark, the house should remain on the list for future consideration. iV. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation sus o onm f n reconsider its recommendation to the City Council and not recommend designation because designation 1s without owner consent and will probably not help to protect the house. ,COWISSION STAFF REPORT Staff also recommends that the house not be deleted from the list Of potential landmarks, but retain a potential locll and state landmark notation. Respectfully� sutmitted, Larry Hendarson Senior Planner LH:AB:mlg Attachments: Staff Reports of June 2, 1988 with attachments 1988, July 7, 1988 and August 17, e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: August 17, 1988 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS ROUSE 7980 VINEYARD I. RECOMMENDATION: The Historic Preservation Commission recommends `Efi—AtfFe-7W Council designate The Thous House, 7980 Vineyard, Rancho Cucamonga, a landmark. II. BACKGROUND: This site was brought to the Commission's attention in connec EFT with a proposed office building (DR 88 -11). Its status on the list of designated and potential landmarks is PLL/PSL /PHL, Potential Local Landmark, Potential State Landmark, and Potential National Landmark. The reason for its significance is its association with the Thomas Vineyards Winery. It was built in 1926 by H.H. Thomas and sold to L.R. Thomas who owned it until 1941; it then was transferred to William L. Thomas. It is a simple When this house was first being considered, there appeared to be s good possibility that the building could be moved onto a site within the Thomas Winery Plaza complex across the street. It appears, however, that the cost of rebuilding the rather higgh foundation, rewiring and making other changes for commercial use is too high to make moving feasible, according to Rudy Stroink, Project Manager for the Thomas Winery Plaza development. The owner, Edward R. Combs, is opposed to designation and to anything that would delay or add costs to his office project. The Commission did not expect that the building would be retained on site; however, the Commission did want to encourage its preservation by encouraging it to be moved. III. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ACTION: The Historic Preservation omm ss on vo a sen , to recommend designation of the Thomas House as a landmark. They also included recommended Conditions of Approval in the hopes of encouraging tie relocation of the house: r � .6„ a CI'rY COUNCIL STAFVREPORT,•, THOMAS HOUSE` :. Aagamst 17, 1968 " Page 2 ;l 1. That the house be moved to a suitable location, and° the developer ,contribute toward the move an amount equal to the cost of demolition,`or,' 2. If the structure cannot,be rived, that a -demolition permit not be issued until- building,permits are ready to be issued and a letter received guaranteeing that financing has been secured. In um addition, '. the', house should be fully 'docented with measurements, photographs, and further research.. The reason for the second recommendation is'the experience with the Klusmen House that-,was demolished- and no project built. These , conditions are reasonable in that the demolition of a historically significant structure is.considered an environmental impact under CEpA (California Environmental quality fzt),'that must be mitigated unless an Environmental Impact Report is prepared iand a statement of overriding considerations adopted. Therefore, these two conditions could be used as mitigation measures for a Negative Declaration for the office project. 4 R ect 1 , ad Du C mn BB:AB:mlg Attachments: Historic Preservation Commission Staff Reports Site Plans Resolution t ,ma ^•r r--e•) w'3.� " ^..A.w, X ,ay,, t`.y �v �',. �Y.. t �`; �i a,�� "u '.'�', tM��.'K�r.Y � r.�.p� "� :�+ { A•l �' cd'•.: �' ,. n o r� .. •.'Z.[- :?)1.. t , •_ Ci:. t ciw•Ca; c _�„�,k C1ty ot.Eaecho Cueuoa[a . s ^brck ?,��« t �' .r3Ip=31Ci'Anwa DruGHATION 83810SIC'POINT OF IAMEST DESIGNATION x Hiatotlo Landmark Hlatorto point of inttireat S ^ IDEIRI►ICATION ' r ^1. Commod Naart Thomas House• ' 7. 6Ristartti N". 11,ka6'was Thomas Hoot, J. Sttoet or BYra14ddru/s . 79au YlreraM Are," , CStft_ Rancho ^fuumige tlpr^91730. COaatyl ion kerns Mlno Aaaeewr'a paroiliNo._ x07402 -09 touts_jC,lL j) Hire egrc. Wp1 Description t��file Fan, A. Prix at Oiavr ,', if- knout, rd [cabs Address's aii `Y' eenerss Cit7t Uotanal. tip/ 91706 Onnerahlp tat Pub"i > �^ iT ge — S. Pn,;iK tla,' atdence OrigComl ON, Residence a. — Other put ua*rt DESCRIPTION d. ,Brlefly describe toe pre*eat phrafeal a0oare0ce of the alt* or atraoture ad doaaribe tay.ses or alteratloia M. Its, Grits.., o0ndltla /t�.t9 state Iola'- 'a_very ifa01 'e^ 1 Nth f•11 length r,Cessid m. b, river rock foun_datlon aM ,oreh -f-n and cla,6o M sidlnq, T. LOCatIOR sketch step (draw A label alto and eurrounding atresta, reads, and pacmineaL lssdaarts), h. APprozla►te Property size, Lot Size (in 1taei) rronczge 170 Depth 160 or approx. acreage B. Conditions (check one) a. Eacell*at— b. Good_ c. T/It = d. Deteriorated_ e. NO longer In ealetwCe_ 30. Ie the features a. Altrred7_ Is. Unaltettif 1 11. Surroundinges (check more that one It necessary) a. Open land b. Seelden :le f _ c. Scattered bdlldinge .x d. Densely built -up x 0. Commercial x 0 `) 17. Threats to Biter a. Nons kaosn__ b. Private develnnment-_&_ a. ZOO le�„�t �. d. Public Works Prolect�_ a. Vandsliea_� t. Other_ /t °� 10. Dates of eaclonsd ptotusrapb(s) 1987 r• 'Y '� { r.' NOTRt The following (Itema 11 -19) are to ntcvetuns Daly. _s id. Primary exterior bul3dSng material: A. 9tooe�_ D. Oriek,__ '+ a. Stucco_ d. Adobe_ e. Wood x t. Other �)^ 18. Is tba Structures a. On its original eit0 x ( D., I(ovedT e. Dnkass"? e Id. year of Initial Constructions 1926 Tula Date 1st a. ?actual x b. Estiasated •' 17. Arebitsot (it knowa)t r ` 18. EYSlder (it knowo)s H.N. Thomas ;�(1+ 19. Relatid ?eatureas a. Earn b. Carriage boues .x�. 0. Outhouse d. Bbed(s) e. Formal Garden(m) .� 3. f. Windmlll g. Watertoeer /taaktouse a vy b. Other i. Nome i S)GNIIICANCR 20. Briefly state historical and /or arebitectural Importance (include dates, everts, and persons associated with the site when known): ! Built by and ter the Thomas family of Thnaus rireyerds (sea State Inventory torso) 21. Main there of the historic resources (chock only On@)t a. Architecture___ b. Arts A Leisure a. gcomomic /Industrial x d. Goverament - e. Exploration/Settlement f. Military g. Religion h. Soclal /Education -_ 33. Sourcest List books, documents, Arrvge. Perscmal 10t0[yleeO. and .heir date@: 13. Date fors prepared stay. 1988 By (nane)s Arlene Banks Address, City: _— 21pt— Phnnei Organizations city 41 Rancho cucacon9a 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: June 2, 1988 TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE 7980 VINEYARD, THE TMMAS HOUSE, A HISTORIC LANDMARX - APN: 207- 102 -09 I. ACTION REWESTED: That the Historic Preservation Cosmission eessignate roe Inoma s House a Historic Landmark. II. SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Location: The site is located near the southwest corner of San ernar no Road and Vineyard; it is north of the Thomas Brothers Winery. 8. Site Land Use - �oning - General Plan Designation: The site is a single fame y muse, s zon ng is derermined by the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. It is zoned CC, Community Commercial (includes a wide variety of uses including drug stores, supermarkets, and commercial recreation uses for neighborhood /district level commercial goods and services). It has a Commercial General Plan designation. The site is part of the Foothill - Vineyard A:tivity Center, in Subarea II. C. Surrounding Land Uses - Zoning - General Plan Designation: North - Single family residential• "oned MR, Medium Density Residential (8 -14 units oc, ccre) in the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Designatdd M, Medium Density Residential (B -la units per acre) in the'Land Use Plan of the General Plan. South - Large, mostly vacant lot with a residence at the southern edge; Zoned CC Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. General Plan designation is Commercial. East - Across Vineyard the land is currently vacant, but the Thomas Brothers Winery mixed use comuercial project has been approved. The land is zoned CC, Community Commercial, Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. General Plan designation is Commercial. 3DI ■ a, 0 i 'a a HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION THE'THONAS HOUSE Y June 2; 1988 Page 2 West - Multi- family apartment'buildings; Zoned CC, Community, Commercial, foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. General Plan designation is Commercial. D. Oescri tion: The house is a simple and plain Craftsman - nr U e- ngalow with horizontal clapboard siding, exposed rafter tails, a front facing gable roof, and full length front porch, a river rock foundation and rock porch piers. Square posts support the porch roof. There are wood frame sash windows and cornerboards. III. ANALYSIS: " A. Back r c s round Currant: This house is on the list `of potential' fiT s s an was scheduled for a hearing in 1990. It is identified as being of potential state and national interest. It has cone to our attention because of a proposed office development which would probably lead to Its removal. B. Background - Historic: The house was built by H.H. Thomas in 7426 a en so --to L.R. Thomas, according to the State Historic Resources Inventory form. L.R. Thomas owned it until 1941 when it was transferred to Marie J. Thomas who held it from 1941 to 1942 when it was transferred to William L. Thomas. It is one of several structures around the Thomas Winery built and used by the Thomas family. C. _Signifiance: This house has some signifcance because it has noT— eltered and is an example of a simple Craftsman infl uenced bungalow. It gains most of its signiflance, however, from the fact that it is associated with one of the prime historical sites in the City, the Thomas Winery, and was built by and for members of the family as they built up their vineyards and their winery business. D. Cit Policies: The City's general policy to preserve sites of s or c n Brest is applicable tq this property. It is shown on the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan map but the Plan does not mention tha historic significance of this building. E. Issues: There is a question about whether to office complex cou incorporate a bungalow into its plan. There is also a question about whether future street widening would encroach upon the structure which is already close to the right -of -way. . - .3Da- ,: SSI0N Page 3 If this stru %Lure is determined to have historic significance and is recofnized is either a Landmark or a Point of Historic en dewlitionts;;of lsuchThaCstructure Enwouldd bel anli adverse environmental inpict and,aitigations�weuld'have to be proposed and IN lairpted° to lessen this` impact, (or a 'Statement,,of Overriding )Considerations' must be ultimately issued which spells out'exactly why the adverse impacts cannot be'mitigatid and stases the reasons that the proiect should go forward despite the adverse impacts:) Mitigations could take the fona of adaptive reuse or moving. F. Environmental Assessment: Designation of a Historic Landmark s exempt ru requirements (Article 19, Section 15308). Iv. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The structure meets several criteria of the W r c reservation Commission Ordinance. A. Historical and Cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical style. 2. The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 3. The proposed landmark was connected with an important family. 4. The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. 8. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. 1. The proposed landmark in its location represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community and city. (Ordinance 70 S9, 1979). IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daily epor . as spoken to the owner, Mr. Ed Combs. a J HISTORIC PRESERYATION COMISSION THE•THOKWHWSE June 2 1988 Page 4 V. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends -that the Historic Preservation M&M�s-onrecammendi- td the city council that the Thomas House be designated -4 Historic Landmark. Respectfully submitted, J" o Henderson � Senior Pla nner LH:AB•m4 Atta.hoents: Resolutions Site Location MIN i 16 duce of Ghroma —The Ries... A'w So, No.1730 — 57 O EPA RTM ENT OF PARKS AN O R ECREATION HABS...HAER.LCC.SHL No. _NR status- UTM• A 11-44171n.1779 '7n C HISTORIC RESOURCES INVENTORY 8 0 IDENTIFICATION 1. Common name: 2. Historic name. Thtynas house 3. Street or rural address: 7980 Vineyard Avenue City Rancho Cucamon0a Z7 91730 County San Bernardino County A. Parcel number 0207- 102 -09 S. Present Owner: William W. Nix Adorns: 578 N. Armsley Souare City Ontario zip 91762 Ownership a: Publrc Prnae X e. Present use: residence Ofiginal use: residence DESCRIPTION 7a. Arrs,nerurallwie: Craftsman Bungalow 7b. Briefly detentes me proant paypcaHppeannce nl the ute or avucmn and describe any major alterations from Its original condition: A single story rertangular structure of wood construction Roof is front gable, with wood •hinglcs Rafters are exposed Siding is wood clapboard Windows are in groupings of Three, of narrow double hung windows located on either side of a fixed double sash. Front door is multiple panel with an upper panel of glass and lower panels of wood An integrated prrch is located along the front of the structure, with rock base pillars supporting rectangular wood pillars extending to the telling and a wood balustrade with an "X" pattern Front porch is of wood with concrete steps extending straight out Foundation is wash rock A small extension is located to the rear of the structure with shed type roof There is some mature shrubbery along foundation A separate garage is located to the rear of the structure, with side gable roof, wood clapboard siding, double hung windows and standard garage door OPR 5231Rw. 11/851 • �� 8. Construction date: Estimated Factual _1_926 9 Architect unknown 10. Budder H H Thomas 11. Approx. Property also (m feet) Frcnuge .120 Depth r or approx. outage — 12. Ostals) of enclosed PhorographlA July 1487 ,E P' ;I m M Condition: Exultant ._Good _ Fair X Oaterlorsted _ No longer in existence, 14. Almadorm: None apparent Is. Surroundings: (Check More men we It n•cuun/ Optn land_satnr•d buildings L_ Oant•ry bolt -W Residential X Industr4l—commercial 1(_0Nat t& Threats to sim None known_PrNats 4MIOPmnt x Zoning _ Vandalism public Works Praha _ other. 17, lethetttvcture: oniumiginaldta? X Mvid?_ Unknown? 1& Petaled futures: N/A SIGNIFICANCE 19. Briefly state histuwal nd /or architecture knpersana (Induda date, wwo, and persona asttdsted with the ut•J andsused by members rof the Thomas family and dbysoe ofethe workers at thetWiner built Winery. This particular structure was built in 1926 by H. H. Thomas, and was then sold to L. R. Thomas who owned the structure from 1926 until 1941. It was transfered to Marie J. Thomas from 1941 to 1942, and then was transfered to William L. Thomas 20. Men theme of the Mnorlc reiatt": (If mare then oM IS checked, number in old" of Imporunu.l Ard ltaaure AM & Letup Econarnkfinduttrial XExptarsuon/Settl•mwht Gorumnant Miliury R691an Sodal /Edueatian 21. Sources (List books. document. tuner. personal lntMh ws and their dam). A Field Guide to American Houses,n Virginia d Lee McAlester: San Bernardino County Assessor Records: personal inter- view with Ada Cooper, November 1987. 22 oats corm w•Parad November 1987 By (name) Lynn err Organintlon GN zip — Phone: Loutlonal sketch MAP (draw and lent slu one mmunding streets, roads, nd prominent landmarks): 3o� [� \pF is Nossir feasatr ss uenAir U..4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 7, 1908 mmg' TO: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Larry Henderson, Senior Planner BY: Arlene Banks, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A PROPOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE 7980 VINEYARD I. BACKGROUND: This item was continued at the June 2, 1988 Historic reserve on Commission meeting. The Commission wanted an opportunity to consider the relationship of the house to the proposed Site Plan and to see how the widening of Vineyard Avenue would affect the house. Attached is a copy of the existing site plan, elevations, grading plan, landscape plan, and the proposed site plan. The existing house and garage would have to be removed to execute the Plan as shown. According to Engineering staff, widening of Vineyard Avenue would leave an ample parkway in front of the house. The proposed office structure is even slightly closer to Vineyard. II. UPDATE: The Thomas winery Plaza across the street from this house may -e able to incorporate the house in its development which includes an adaptive reuse of existing buildings as well as new construction. The project manager, Rudy Stroink, is considering a number of questions about the cost of moving, the feasibility of renting the space, parking spaces, and other considerations before he can recommend such a move. The owner of the house, Ed Combs, is opposed to anything that could delay building his project. III. RECUHENDATION: Staff still recommends that the Historic reserve an ommission recommend designation of the Thomas House as a landmark because of its association with the Thomas family as explained in the June 2, 1988 staff report. Furthermore, staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend to the Planning Commission that they condition their approval of the design of the proposed office buildings with one of the following: 1. That the house, and if possible the garage, be moved to a suitable location off the property, such move to be partially funded by the developer (at least f , high end cost 0 demolition). 3D Fa HPC STAFFREPORT� HISTORIC LAkgiAPoC "— THOMAS HOUSE j ;, July 7, 1988 :, r A--,. ; Page 2 - • -5 2, If after a good'faith effort there is no place to which to move the structure(s), that a permit for demolition cannot be issued until, building permits for the project are ready, to be issued and a letter . is received by the City Planner guaranteeing' that financing for the ,protect has been secured.*-- --The, Thomas House must be fully documente`' with photographs, drawings, and further research by, a professional historic preservation consultant to create as cw:plete a record as possible of the- " Respectfully submitted, Larry Henderson Senior Planner LH:AB:te Attachments: Site Utilization Map Building Elevations and Section Conceptual Grading Plan Conceptual Landscape Plan Site and First Floor Plan t: t 1 i MEOW K p D W CITY OF R.AINCHO CLCAMON(;A PLANNING DIVISION 3V9 V NORTH rm%t, TrIUS Thomas %Rouse EXHIBI SCALE: — Acting Chairmen Banks stated that the idea of moving the rn was presented to the Etiwanda Hfitorical;Society, but it is reelly too b She stated that maybe they could deslgm the new barn as a replica and se-the siding from the barn. She stated that she was concerned over the t limit given by the Water District to move the barn . Arlene Banks stated that It was her understand 9 that the 30 to 60 days was to decide if the Etiwanda Histori/designation , s interested, not to make the arrangements. Larry Henderson stated that the 1s concerned about liability if there was a fire. Comfssioner Amer moved tc reco. of 9370 Etiwanda Avanue, the Etiwanda Grape Products Co., as a oric Interest to the City Council for approval. Commissionconded the motion. The motion was carried by the following vote AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARHER, HASKYITZ, ARNER, BANKS, COOPER NOES: COfMIS5 NONE ABSENT: COMISS BILLINGS, SCHHIDT -- carried Arlene Banks question mmission agreed with staff as to documentation of t7rr uilding. The Commission coned. A # # # # A E. A PROP OSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOMAS HOUSE 7980 VINEYARD. A HISTORM ramm�nr� Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Acting Chairman Banks questioned if the City Council Resolution would be able to include the two recommendations to the Planning Commission. She stated that she wanted the City Council to be aware that the Historic Preservation Commfsslon is aware of owner opposition and is taking mitigating measures. Larry Henderson stated that the City Council would receive all copies of the previous staff reports and the Historic Preservation Commission's to the Planning Commission. Arlene Banks stated that this item would first go before the Planning Commission. HPC MINUTES -5- JULY 7, 2988 31 o C v Acting Chairman Banks re- opened the public hearing. Hearing noone, Acting Chairman Banks closed the public hearing. Commissioner Cooper moved to recoaend designation of 7980 Vineyard, the two additional recommendations dations tto the PlanningdCommission. Commissioner Sttams seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COiMISSI0NER5: F. COOPER, STA'M, ARNER, BANKS, HASKVITZ NONE BILLINGS, SCFMIDT Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Acting Chairman Banks opened the public John Liao, owner of the property, stated initial review. He stated he is still i he worked with the architect to incorp stated he will suffer a biy loss with will be compensation for his loss. -- carried have presented the plan for n to the designation, but $e into the design. lie He questioned If there Victor Pales, architect with Inlan Oestgn, architect for this project, stated that it was unfortunate his clfen was not aware of the possible designation before he purchased the land and subeitted the first site plan for review. He stated the density cannot be ma tmized with the house left on the property. He stated that a better design could be done without the house. He stated it will become an economic hards ip trying to incorporate detailings from the existing house. Acting Chairman Banks clos�d the public hearing. Larry Henderson s/aut t in response to Hr. Ltao's question, the City has no mechanism for compensation to the developer. Brad Buller, CiL.v stated that the majority of developments with a maximum of 14 dwats per acre usually get about 10 -11 dwelling units per acre, which i6f maximum density. Acting Chairman Bed she would like to see the four units in front of the house be move ter visibility. HPC MINUTES -6- JULY 7, 2988 311 A W Linapprove<( minufes A PRODOSAL TO DESIGNATE THE THOWIS HOUSE VINEYARD AVLWJE �D7 Arlene Banks presented the staff report. Commissioner Arner stated that most of the older bungalows were built on rock, so probably most would not be able to be saved. Larry Henderson stated that the Thomas Winery project was being reviewed this evening at Design Review, and they were deleting the building area where the Tohams House would . have been placed. He felt perhaps someone else could move it to some other locatica. Coax :stoner Haskvtt_ suggested obtaining the bidder's list from the Ledig House and seeing if any of those parities would be interested In the Thomas House. Chat man Schmidt opened the public hearing. Hearing no cements. the public hearing was closed. Motioa: Moved by Billings. seconded by Haskvitz, to accept staff's recommendation to rescind designation of the Thomas House as a Landmark or Point of Interest, tut to retain the house on the survey list and to send a letter to the bidder's list from the Wig !louse. The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNER, BILLINGS, HASKYITZ, SCHMIDT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BANKS, COOPER, STAMM L-- carried f f f f -C\ 1A PROPOSAL DESIGNATE THE ALTA LOMA CITRUS I ' PACKING _2 - Arlene Banks, scclate Planner, presented the staff report. Larry Henderson, Sen fanner, asked if the Mills Act would be available for Aae this property. Ms. Banks affirmed that it woul . Chairman Schmidt opened the public hem Christina Sierra, attorney for Asoerican N anal Can ComyAny. presented a letter from Mr. John P. Totten of American App is Associiates. She stated with Mr. T tten'srecoameMatlon thatithe prope�nty ban es gnateed asahPoint of HPC Minutes -3- October 6, 1988 - 3�a- Y c: - RESOLUTION N0. 67J A RESOLUTION OF -THE CITY•COUNCIL OF THE CITY Of. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGNATION OF THE Y THOMAS HOUSE LOCATED'AT 7980 VINEYARD AS A LANDMARK �a^ WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission has'held a duly edverticed pabilc hearing to'consider'ail comments on the proposed Landmark Designation and issued Resolution No.-88- recommending to this City council trat said Landmark Designation,be approveif - is WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed all input from the Historic Preservation Commission regarding said'Landmark Designation. WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. HOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council hereby specifically finds, determines, and resolves as follows: SECTION I: The application applies to property located at Assessor Parcel N' er - 02 -09. BCTOM .4.9R following r 2200 of the ancho Cucamonga MunicialCode A. Historical and cultural Significance: 1. The proposed landmark is particularly representative of an historical style. 2 The proposed landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare. 3 The proposed landmark was connected w'th an important family. 4 The proposed landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. 8 Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: 1 The proposed landmark in its location represents an establish and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community and city. (Ordinance 70 S9, 1979) SECTION Iii: Designation of a landmark is exempt from CEQA (Article 19, Sect an ,� 13 1. iU;RtSOLUTIONf, =rtW H =HOUSE't August 1988Z Page SECTION IV: B&j',jd on th"e',substantial evideme received-and reviewed by- this Uo—unffr—and, based, on theMPAngs'set forth - above, HOW. THEREFORE. 'BE If- E-SOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga city CouWil does hereby approve designation of TM,Thosas House as alandmark.:' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 19, 1988 TO: City Council FROM: Lauren N. Wasserman, City Manager SUBJECT: NORTHEAST ETTWANDA COMKUN TT PARK PROJECT FINANCING Review and approval of an Agreement for Legal services with Jones, Hat 6 White, to act as Bond Council and, and adoption of a Resolution Vnic authorize and direct staff to proceed with the financing of the p Northeast Etiwanda Community Parksite Land Acquisition. BACKGROUND: The City is in the process of acquiring land in the Northeast section of Etiwanda for a community parkslte. The location under consideration 1s generally in the proximate area of summit and East Avenue. The total cost of the land has not been finalized through J. William Murphy and Associates, the City's consulting appraiser, however, it is felt the cost should not exceed $2.9 million. The funding source for this project is the propo,ed sale of Certificates of Participation (Bonds). The Resolution under co�isideration would allow City funds to Initially pay for the park land area and be reimoursed through the sale of these certificates. The City has contacted the underwriter and obtained four scenarios which are being reviewed by staff. A recommendation as to the term of the bonds will be furthctming after all the scenarios have been evaluated. The City has contacted the firm of Jones, :all, Hill 6 White, who will act as bond counsel to the sale of the Certifi:ates. Respectfuliv submitted, uren . Wassernen City Manager LMW:cm 31,5 m Y} s AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES (Pak AcquL*Mon Project? ` THIS AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES Is made and entered Into this day of . 1888, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CLICAMONOA, 6; CALIFORNIA (the 'City), and JONES HALL HILL a WHITE, A PROFESSIONAL LAW * CORPORATION, Sep. Francisco, California ('Attomeys'). WITNES8ETH: ' WHEREAS, the City proposes to Mane the eoqu!shlon of land for the proposed northeast Etawands park by entering Into such agreements as may be necessary and to authorize the axacuticn, delivery and sa7o Of cortifioates of participation in payments to be made under such agreements (the 'Certificates'); and WHEREAS, the City has detennlnoci that Attorneys J end s ` experienced to provide services for the financing and theexocution an delivery of the d delive ry Certificates; and X WHEREAS. the public Interest, economy and gerimal welfare will be served by this Agreemont for Legal Services; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED, as followe: 1 Dudes of Attorneys. Attom%s shall provide legal se.ices In cann3ction with the authorization, Issuance and consummation of the financing proceedings relating to executlun and delivery of the Certificates. Such services shall Include the following: _ a. Confer and consult with the officers and administrative st.ff of the City as to matters relating to the financing pr,iceedings; b. Attend all meetings of the City Pouncil Of the City and any udministrame meetings at which any financing proceedings relating to tha Certificates are to be discussed. deemed necessary by Attomeya for the props, planning of the financing proceedings or when snecifically requested to attend; c. Prepare any required lease agreements, trust agreements, assignment agreements, agency agreements, amendments to existing financing documonts, Indentures, ordinances and all resolutions, notices and legal documents necessary for the proper conduct of the financing proceedings reiating to the execution and delivery, of the Certificates; d. Review all financial documents for legal sufficiency; t P R 4 e. Review, without undelaking an Independent Investigation, any of ldal ° =` statement or oilier dscbsure documtxn prepared In connection with the fNancing ?IG prcceadfrtga to setae ccrrectnuls of disclosure relating to the legal documenta; f. Prapara and provide a elgnature and no- litigation certificate, an x arbitrage c6ldflcats and any and all other dosing documents required to accompany delivery of the CertlACataa; p g. Prepere and provide a complete transcipt of the conduct of the ;. proceedings neeewary to accompany deNery of the Certificates; �• h. Subject to tha completion of proceedings to the satisfaction of Attomeyc, provide the legal opinion of Attorneys that the Interest due with respect r� to the Certificates 1s excludable from gross income for purposes of federal Income taxation and that such Interest Is oxempt from Cafifomia personal income taxation; a I. Subject to the completion of pros »dings to the satisfaction of 7 Attorneys, provide the legal opinion of Attorneys approving in all regards the legality of a0 proceedings relating to the execution and delivery of the Certificates; and Confer and consult with City officials and agents with regard to problems which may arise during the servicing and payment of principal and Interest due with respect to the Certificates. 2. Compensation. For the anrvlcas set forth under Section 1, Attomays shall be paid the percentage compensation set forth below, subject to a minimum tee of $15,1300: a. One percent (1 %) of the principal amount of the Certificates to a principal amount of $1,000,0(0, plus; b. One -half percent (1/2 %) of the principal amount of the Certificates In excess of f 1000,000, but leas than or equal to $5,000,000, plus; c. One - quarter percent (1/4 %) of the rdndpal amount of the Certificates In excess of $5,000,000, but less than or equal to $10.000,000, plus; d. One - eighth percent (1/8 %) of the principal amount of the Certificates In excess of $10.000,000, but less than or equal to $20.000,000, plus; e One - sixteenth percent (1/16 %) of the principal amount of the Certificates In excess of 120,000,000. In addition, Attorneys shall be reimbursed for any costs advanced by Attorneys on behalf of the City, Including delivery and messenger services, closing costs, duplication costs, transcript binding costs and expenses for travel outside the State of California any, but specifically excluding travel expenses within the State of California. -2- - 3/ �7 4v` ,�,. ei`y ✓: .,��:c' =rhd :!y. v;".�ti..Iw .. , =. ,sa i "w �a:r - `,Frir°_ - _�iaa x ;_ pros We of fheLYrtr AM at other avasable moneve of the City, 3 ExOaaYtMef }!'Aryisrviwa rendered in any litigation Involving the City or the financing prxeefts ieWiig to the Certificates are excepted from the servkes to be rendered for the above comps tton. For such service* which Attorneys are directed to render for and on behalf of the City, oompensatlon shelf be on the basis of reasonable fees to be agreed upon by the City and Attomeys. 4. Termination of Agreament. This Agreement for Legal Services shall be indefrJte as to term but may. be terminated at any time by the City, with or without cause, upon ninety, (9M days'- W ttentnotloe to Attorneys.' - In the event of such termination, all flntshed -and unfiniefteil: documents shell, at the' optlam or the City, become Its property and shell be delivered by Attorneys. ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF; the parties hereto have caused these presents to be ;. executed by their respective officers thereunto duty authorized as of the day and year_ first above written. M neu CITY OF F.ANC' 0 CUCAMONGA, Attest: City Clerk JONES HALL HILL 6 WHITE. A Processional Law Corporation By an D. Quint RESOLUTION N0. '10 3 ' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROVIDING THAT PAYMENTS MADE BY THE CITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACQUISITION- OF LAND RELATING TO THE NORTHEAST ETIWANOA COMMUNITY PARK PROJECT ARE TO BE MADE IN ANTICIPATION OF REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE PROCEEDS OF A PLANNED LEASE FINANCING WITH CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE.CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO ty' RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the •Ci): WHEREAS, the City is proposing to proceed With a lease financing with certificates of participation; and WHEREAS, in con;.ection therewith, the City proposes to finance the acquisition of certdin land relating to the northwest Etiwaida Community Park project (the 'Project ") and it is in the best interest of the city, is to the Public interest and is for the public benefit that the City set forth its expectation of reimbursement from the proceeds of such proposed financing; 'a NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows; �Y Section 1. Any payments made by the City from its general fund or a other available moneys in connection with the Project, prior to the d consummation of the proposed lease financing with certificates of participation, are intended to be made strictly in anticipation of reimbursement therefor from the proceeds of sich financing. Section 2. The Mayor, the City Manager and other appropriate officials of the City are hereby authorized and directed to do any and all things and take any and all actions which may be necessary or advisable in accordance with this Resolution. Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect ieaediately. ~�9 'a � G ,l ■:. M , •ts. — CITY OF RANCHO CUWA VNGA STAFF REPORT " rr3 Date: ootober�l9, 1988 u n To: Mayor, Member",' -' City Council and City Manager From: Joe Schultz, Community Servicen Manager Subject: Appointment of Ono Council xember And Designation Of Mayor To Serve On Task Force Tn Review Park And Recreation Facilities ��?LTI42i:. To appoint one City Councilmsmber and designating the Mayor for review of existing park and recreation facilitiast assessing long term needs for these facilities and develop a future action plan for Providing park and recreation facilities. unmpm ;. The attached plan will give appropriate study to existing facilities and give input into pro pp ;�eatod from oeod facilities needed for long -term facility programming. This study was re Council Members at a recant City Council meeting. Respectfully Submitted, Jo 9cl:ultz (y\ Co unity Servic0e'?Sanagar CC: Jack Lam, Assistant City Manager Park and Recreation Commission JS: be Attachment: Task Force To Review Park and Recreation Faoilities 3D0 a; rA :F TASK FORf3 TO REVIEW PARK AND RECRSATIOR FACILITIES: PURPOSEt F, The City Council has created a 32 member task force made up of residents, local youth sport organization representatives, and electod and appointed City officials to reviev existing park and recreation facilities, &*sees the long- - tam needs for these facilities and develop a future action plan for providing park and recreation facilities. THE GOALS OF THE TASK POECE ARE AS FOLLOWS1 1. To inventory all existing sport uses within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. r _ 2. To study all availability of open space and other park /recreation asmnities vith.n park and recreation facilities. 3. To project loug -tam needs for park and recreation facilities. 4. To formulate a plan for providing adegmte perk and recreation facilities as identified by the City a General Plan. The Task Force consists of the following representatives appointed by the City Council. 1 - Vineyard Little League Representative 1 - Alta Loma Little League Representative 1 - Citrus Little League Representative 1 - Deer Canyon Little League Representative 1 - Rancho Cucamonga Pony-Colt Baseball League Rt- aaentetive 1 - Rancho Cucamonga Legion Baseball League Representative 1 - ACE Youth Softball League Representative I - Hiss Softball America Representative 1 - AYSO Region 65 Representative 1 - Inland Empire Volleyball Club Representative 1 - Rancho Cucamonga Senior Soccer League Representative 1 - Rancho Cucam,oga Adult Soccer League Representative 1 - CYSA Saccer'Sepresentativa 1 - ACE T -Ball Representative 1 - Rancho Cucamonga Pop Warner Jr. Football Representative 1 - VIP Club Representative I - Mayor I - City Councilmember 2 - Planning Commission Members 2 - Park and Recreation Commission Members 10 - Citic -ans Al Large Appointed by the City Council City staff will provide support and act as liason to the task force and committees. 4 STPAT9CTi The Task Force will couduet• itself according to the following strategy. 1. The entire Task Force will moat for an initial organization meeting. 2. Task Ports membera will divide into the follwing committees to ezemine specific aspects of pack and recreation facilities and amenties. a Committee to survey and inventory existing pack and recreation facilities. • Committee to survey potential public and private rights -ef-wsy, and other properties which may be developed as park and rear, itioa facilities. • Committee to assess the need for future facilities for adult and youth sports. • Committee to assess the need for other park, cultural and recreation azentieo and facilities (not related to adult and youth sports). • City staff will research the potential for future park acquisition and development. 3. the entire Task Force will meet again to discuss findings of each committee. 4. The Task Force findings will be forwarded to the Park and Recreation Commission for review. 5. The Park and Recreation Commission will submit the Task Force findings, along with its ow comments, to the City Council for consideration and action. SCNRD"Ui October, 1988 Organize Task Force Mid- November, 1988 Task Force Initial Meeting November- December, 1988 Committee Meetings and Research Mid - January, 1989 Task Force Heats to Consider Committee Findings January, 1989 Task Force Findings Submitted to Park and Recreation Commission February, 1989 Findings Submitted to City Council L'3V s a 0 L TEN!Nv X VzWs' WAT 18 t8OPOUTION 85? 8' Propositton,:.jSS is a $75 jillion state bond issue for library conatimwt6n and renovation. :L18RAR1E HXK 219 VW DOES VLOPOS171021 83.DO? (9161 "1 3 Authoriiis grants to any city, county, city-county, or •-e district "which, Is ouspavored to awn or maintain a local HOMWART OMARR V�ubllc, library`.; - Grants could be used to address the following needs: - site acquisition. - new building construction. M.&W. C.441-k .,remodel existing buildings to increase energy Sa PTA efficiency. I Srww Km M6JdJ renovate existing buildings to most health staff S. S� safety codes.. X".*'L.dw renovate or ' remodel existing buildings for 9. handle& pad access. AuW Ga, F. $a.$ * The minimum grant application would be $35,000 per project • The grant applicant (local community) ♦aUld be required to DMORM provide at least 35% of the project cost Thus• there would be a CAGAMAnews state and local partnership in funding each of the approved Irnd Ml projects A..a... A..,I". a Lw',,.." W. Grants could me be used for administrative costs, ongoing operational costs, books, materials, or repayments of local loam AFtX1U Will NOT raise taxes • .f Mw n.n Tn.Y.. ..J C� -.= M IS PILOPOSITION 83 KICUSARY? QW". tg—� A..°t.t.. California Is In the midst of extraordinary population and r j Wdi. ..d economic growth. This year alone California'• population grow by 116., Ed.t. 600.000 p4oplet Like many Important community services, libraries A.. have best unable to keep pace with this rapid gravrh. As a result, there sre California neighborhoods and communities that aimply do not h&i* a local library C.U.. 9,.,. PTA C.W..t . T....... Other communities rely an old library structures .•some built A—"° as far back as 1852, with many built prior to 1930. These older facilities need to be expanded, made more accessible to the handicapped, strengthened for earthquake safety• or remodeled to be core efficient A recent survey conducted by the State Librarian found that 110 of California's 169 public library systems Identified L a need for construction or renovation funding CAWPIGN MANAGER 185 Library Construction and Renovation Bind Act of 1988 Argument In Favor of Proposition 85 i' California is in the midst of extraordinary popukt1 . and economic growth. THIS YEAR ALONE, CnLIFOA• F A'IA5 POPULATION HAS CROWN BY 6000,00 PrO. PLE Like many important community services, libraries have been unable to keep pan;. The results are: a SM-NY CALIFORNIA COMMUNITIES DO NOT HAVE A LOCAL LIBRARY a Many communities rely on old structures that need to be expanded strengthened for earthquake safety, made more accessible to the handicapped, or remod- � • eled for efficiency. SONSELIBRARIESCURRENTLY IN USE WERE BUILT AS FAR BACK AS I632—MANY PRIOR TO 1930. *Important library programs. LIKE NEW PRO. CRAMS FOR CHILDREN AND ADULTS ]UST LEAr1 \7 \C TO READ, have placed added demands on library facilities Proposition 63 is e common sense, cwt• ffiectjve spy i proach to address these critical problem, Your yea vote '.§f. for Proposition 85 will NOT raise taxes. Proposition 83 establishes a partnership of state and local government, in which the state pays only 65% of the v ;t s. r construction or renovation cost. -The local community must cover tbra re.Tdlning 35 %. -That means a libran- must be a priority to the loco; community before the state will help finance It. That also means Proposition as will actually result is, ova 9113 trillion in library construction snA r n:.Hnn -• Ilbrarieslare the open, community•hased, public way we makes our lieritige, literature, knosvkdge, and skAls available to all Californians.' Daniel Boorstin, former Director of the Library of Congress, said: "Libraries remalm the meccas of self-help, %here there we no entrance examinations and no diplomas, and Where we can enter at any age.- ' r We need safe and efficient libraries to sane our communities. We need Proposition WI ` , DARRY I E E Sun Snow ,. and Diand Soso& Mgfontr Lwder IAN HADDY Sus Sn aarq Isla Dbtrid Snow Hisseriy leader HELEN IL UNDSET Isr UM4 Gil(ranne Sul, FrA Rebuttal to Argument in Favor of Proposition 8S The proponent$ of this bond measure are telling ;as than the truth when they say Proposition 85 will not raise taxes They fall to note that bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the State of California. When the word "state" is mentioned, tAis really means "taxpayer" In 1919 s oters passed Proposition 4 by a 74% majority. This measure. known as the "Cann Spending Limit," Imnits the annual rise in state budges. Politicians like Seraton Keene and hladdv are Frustrated by their inab8• Its to directls spend more of the taxpaveri money Since bonds are exempt from the spending limits, their use has grow n phersomenalh over the last eight years There are 532S_'.00u Ono in bonds on this ballot alone' It s time to stop approsing even bond measure that comes up for a mote You mats lose a certain program or setviec, but always remember that someone must pas And that someone B YOUI Proposition 83 creates a dangerous precedent of a "partnership of state and local government" Thu just means that state officals will be interfering in local affairs more than they do already. . Proposition 85 Is expensive, flawed, and decepthe. VOTE . \O on Propositicr 8S. TED BROWN =Qslr000, LMtn4a lady of Califerou X't for 111 ftwarraA xa.d D d W kl%l 1. COIAS%ORrlls' S*w3o,o SW Casinose, LtMerrrian Pony of Cefiforn,a Caodfdsu for 14 Cosgr josh D4fntf SARAH E FOSTER LlvnurLn Candidne far Suite Sewtar. 93rd D.dntt 34 .Ala rs n minted on this err tie the aounlans of the authors sad lies, ant r�a�i� f 'eF�•��- Tl " Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 1988 Argument Against Proposition 85 The State Leghlature asks you to approve STS million In bonds to Improve public library facilities We urge you to vote ,N'0. Libraries are usually run by cities and cowties Since when has the state government been responsible for the upkeep of libraries? The state already requtrn spending for numerous programs In Calilomb's cities and counties This appears to be further interference In in area where It b completely unnecessary. In any event, this measure is unfair to most Califor• Manx. Less than one•third of the people use library services, yet they are subsidized by the other two-thirds of the non•librarypatronhing publim-Poor and lower Income residents mint pay lases for services that are used Primarily by middle and upper•middytelus white collar individuals. This subsid • should end. Many libraries across the country already charge for special services, such as loan• ing best sellers, giving interlibrary loans, handling equip. ment rentals, etc. Why shouldn't library patrons pay either an annual membership fee or a bythe•book rentay Fee for regular library services? Let shore who want a service Pay for Ill The Brat library in the United States %as a pprivate subscription library founded by Benjamin Franm in 1771 \tam• communities today use the same method by charging an annual fee and by using volunteer staff. Others have contracted library services to private com• Panics If a service Is worthwhile, as libraries certainly are, it will be Provided in the free market. Libraries receive extensive gilts and endowments even now. Such contri• butlons would increase if there was a lack of government financing. .Please remember when you cast your ballot that there are 57,000,000 worth of bonds being proposed. This measure by Itself may seem small, but It is part of a much larger picture. Remember that a'bond- is defined•as "anything that binds, fastens, or confines; imprisonment: Y Pty " Cal fomsam will be stuck paying the bill for 70 A vote for Proposition 85 will put the state govemmenl. Into yet another area where it doesn't belong —and sin Put us In debt at the same time. Vote NO on Proposition 83 and vote NO on all the other bond measures on this ballot. TED BROMN Cb'—m ub+larfen Pana al w(fornfa C--440101 tit Canaraaa IDnd DWnr, Kbt 1. COLDSWOFMIT SaatAmt 17a Caair,rwl Libertarian Parry of celyomia Codldai.lo• V4 CamrnA Mh DOt.4r SARAH E FOS'Ett ubrradaa Qmd damyar State .^.,rotor, Sri D6Mn Rebuttal to Argument Against Proposition 65 Despite claims of opponents of Proposition 85, the State OF California has a history of commitment to public libraries dating back to the turn of the century. Provisions for a statewide system of local public libraries are furaly fix1d In stall taw, not local ordinances. The opponents statement that band funds would be used to run libraries which are - usual1v run by dries and counties" is absolutely misleading. 'she only we of these funds is for projects to build or renovate library struc. tures Local communities would continue to retain opera atiorwl control of libraries. and pay operational costs as the, deem necessary It Is appropriate to use bonds for public library facilities became the fadhties will be available for public use throughout the Period wben the bonds are being paid Off. Bond financing ts also the mechanism preferred b. private industry to fund major building projects caWar. nia has a A.AA bond rating, and the nonpartisans Leosi.. tive Analyst has conclud, that "there Is no evidence that Califomia f current debt burden is excessive or poses any significant fiscal threat." We need M have local liL�aries to se-%s our growing communities Proposition 8.5 la the logicil. castle((eeti,e way to build those libraries. Vote "1'Ei' on Proposthon as State bond funds are uses to build local schools, acquire eummunsh m Parks, and build county jails Community seat.R Smaotr.. JnA DWHa libraries supplement our system of free public education. TOW aRADLES To argue that bond funding should not be avalla.,le for sfaron air al Lee A ... fn hbrar, construction denies education the top priority RICBARD P. SIMPSON an en it b, the State Constitution, FJteadw Sara hrdd• ,t Cafllanw Tarp PM Ancried.. 3a5 CS9 Naumann pnntrd on thb DaP ore tM gNnr u of tM authan and Iww not been th,1@4 for a nn b;any amew uMCy* 33 � f }' 1 iii - i • Sa"ti [ t•x- _ \Angeles V Los Count Library. FFy y } 7400 Ea Impei Hry� P.0, Bn 7011, Dowery, CA 90241.701;, (213) 940.8461 r �au'n. F PMUKM McIaO"VA, Cfty ' •rp -e:µ WKrt c •. +r .r July 28, 1988 Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Lee Angeles .t 333 Hall of Admtilstration 500 N. Temple Street Loa Angeles, California 90012 _ Dar Supervisors: ENDORSEMENT OF PROPOSITION SS STATE GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND ISSUE NOVEMBER, 1983 OEMRAL ELECTION : (AD Districts) This L to request that the Board of SupervliDfs formally endorse PrOposltlou 85 which will be on the NOyembct S. 1988 General Election ballot. This measure provides for the lsavance of $75 million in Sate Gxetal Obllgition bonds for mntchlng grans to IOW Ubraries to: construction and expanslcn of facilities. This toad tsave will provide, nt :01 the ti time, Sate General Funds f'v consmetlon of total libraries. Based on e xperlace In Federal constraction grant programs administered by the Sate Library, we expect to qualify for oar fair share of that S75 million or $7400,000 to build facilities to serve the 2.9 million residents of the Library District. The Sate Library will laue 65% matching gams from the proceeds of this bond over a three -yat period starting In 1990- If the County obtains these Sate monies, the 35% local match would require the Library Dlmlct to appropriate $4.0 million In Iocal or Federal matching funds. The Count7's matchlag feuds could be obtained from the Library District's annual budget, City funds, Federal community development block grants, lot.ai private fund raising, and certificate of participation borrowing. Current County Llbrary Needs As a direct result of property tax limitations Imposed by Proposition 13 in 1978, the Library District has not been able to construct additional libraties to serve the significant growth In population since that time. Since 1980, the population served by the County Library W grown by 414,320 from 2.5 to 2.9 million persona without adding any new, additional library facilities. Using the generally accepted ratio of } square foot per capita, the County Library needs to construct over 200,000 square feet of ne+n facilities to maintain existing levels of service. The County is serving additional population equIv- Ment to the size of the City of Long Bach without additional space. Based on estimates Of Popufatlon growth fat communities served by the District included In the County General Plan, we can anticipate a growth of In excess of 600,000 persons over the next 20 years. 3ab 81marable Board of Sapetvlsors Silly 28, 1988 Papa 2 During the Period since 1980, the Public Library bas made use of available fnnding. Leased facilities In Walnut and La Verne were replaced by newly constructed facilities fmanxl by Federal grants and City redevelopment agency funds. Our Willowbrook and wallan Gardens Libraries relocated Into leased space to serve better those eommunitler. Our ,U •th Whittier Library is currently being expended using Federal grant funds. are a" relocating our San Fernando Library W a larger leased space late this a u met. m We _ Thesa modest adjustments in space have not met the critical needs In the growth especfsll,^ In the unincorporated east and north regions of the County. areas, State-wide Needs Tile California State Library conducted a survey of state -ate needs for specific and Immediately required library projects. Based on that survey, cities, counties, and dletrlers identified a critical need for 5873,076,000 in new facilities in 110 local pubes, library meet a small fract, DeeeeddIdentified by local agencies in 987. Based on our success in obtaining Federal grata for replacement libraries In Walnut, La Verne, and for the South Whittler expansion, we expect to be successful In competition for this limited new program for Sate fundhag Of local library construction needs. The Federal Library Services and Construction .Set (LSCA) currently provides only about $2.0 million for the State of California. This modest program catoot meet the needs of the Sate with almost $l billion in Identified MTM space requitauents, and new funding at the State level Is needed. Due to Federal budgetary deficits, tea modest Federal LSCA Ptogram is In jeopardy of being severely refaced or eliminated an: erospeets for an Increase In this source of funds does not scm Hkoiy. Sate -wlde Support for Proposition 9S (SB 181 Keene) The proposal has been endorsed by numerous titles and counties. Other groups endorsing this bond proposal Include the CAL -TAX, California Library Assoclatlon, and Parents Teachers Association (PTA). Consistent with the Board of Supervisors policy of providing adequate facilities to meet critical needs sa areas where population growth requires new facilities, we are requesting Board endorsement of Proposition 85. rr18, THEREFORE, RECOMMENDED THAT VODR'BOARD, Endorse Proposition 95, the Library Construction and Renovation yond Act of 1988, on the No- .ember 8, 1988 General Election ballot. �Very truly •y rs,' Jn/ iIsmond tit GC.e+•e7�/ Linda P. Criamond 1 County Librarian LFC:R V H: p/34 -064 /Ex /f a Chief Counsel Officer ^ /J County y Counsel ,//� . / Auditor - Controller �k -��,,.tp+tRESOLUTION NO, A Res, Z �J.Utl0n:Oi,`the City Council'�of the city'OF ' . California supporting . Proposit. on'. -85 "the C Library. Construction and Renovation Bond Act of WHEREAS the 'public.library As an' enduring and important resource to V ol People of all ages.,,-. races end, economic : backgrounds and needs to be Preserved. WHEREAS many Public library facilities',are unsafe. inaccessible and Inadequate to provide needed -services -to their communities. WHEREAS a state/local I'll,ancial partnership is needed since local Public libraries do not have the funds to remedy this problem of deteriorating and Inadequate library facilities. WHEREAS the California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 1988 will appear as P-OPosition ES an the statewide ballot In November 1988 and, if adopted, would create a grant program to construct and renovate local Public libraries. THEREFOR-.' III IT RCSOLVED, by the City Council of that the F -uncil support Proposition 85. the California Library Construction and renovation Bond Act of 1988, which authorizes the Issuance of $75 million In state general obligation bonds for the purpose of financing a library construction and renovation program. PISSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of 1983. //�� p f 'fj /� /� o-9' ` 4 _s•-wY lWY VW/` ,M, r �i • .3 GIGNAIURE _ - i DATE A00RESS d�«•_,---- ' -�z- -- /�o�� _-- --- - - - - -- ,,,� ,� _ � . �� 635--- --• - -_ �i ;> marble ----- - ----- - --- ---- -- ____ q 3{a- ffl oc b l ------ -- --- --` =!! i __ r `--77- �- - ----- L------- ------- - ---- --- --- - - - -- - -- -` - -i - - -------------1--------------- ------------ --------- x� u -4• DATE ADDRESS SIGNATURE ---------- — ----- e7 I to- rca4"L lf:�S�CLmm --------- ---------------- Awcl, ------------- - -3Y --- v------ ---------- T --- ------------------------------ - 'IN I � " ft""l-kc jlj,- ----- -------------------------- — ------------------- '.1 1 "7 7 " a r b4 - -11�- , ------------------------------------------- ILI---- ", 4 /;, -�V;/ f - ) /C , (424�4 g-"� 1 --- ------------------------ ---------------- :1 � 0 Nadt - ------------------ 04 ---- ") j Ich av I 6 .v M Al A A� e °__------- _t — —e - - - - -- to 'S eAe 9 4* q ------------ to e . � {,M .� `7 /(�J.Y�/ - %�J,� (.LC/ PVT ... !;•� ''j6F 3�a••- ;� tiYi `f a 1 • __ tiff; r - DATE ADDRESS SIGNATURE ------------------ T=°------ ------ --------- ----- ----- - - - - -- c r; ^S - � 141 b ZM r_m,0._evk U-- _d0. - 4�J• - -------- - - -- - — Iv '� 'har 10A 0 M&W r 1o19�i?� _ 283 PMac --- -- --- - -- -- -- - --- - -- q JU -------------- ----------- ---- - - - - -- Y� U �Z DATE ADDRES!i SIGNATURE - - -------------- ------------ qwi--- r -0 Ad — ------- -7 ,7 ---------------------- -Kj a4' ----------------------- -------- �-A-n'c --------------- --------- ------ --------------- --------- I tie sp V 0 ----------- DATE ADDRESS SIGNATURE,•- 6, ----------- "i LINDA VALENTI O EFEi4 + •LI''.. 6278 MARBLE AVENUE - CI ��' 06!hc ;O CUCP. orec, . '• ALTA LOMB, CALIF 91701 •l DfSlL;bl'.b�;�N - .n OCT 1 l 1988` 1 Y IgIDIUI�11t 1419e CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0• ti C/0 CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT e C/0 CITY ENGINEER 9320 BASELINE ROAD {{ RANCHO CUCRMON6R, CALIF 91730 .: DEAR SCOTT MURPHY, IO FOLLOW -UP ON OUR CONVERSATION OF FRIDAY OCTOBER 7, 1998. , WE THE •.> DEMAND THAT DSAID CITY �IMPRUVEMENT ALONG !SAPPHIRE STREET BEEREEMOVEO. IT IS A SAFTY HAZARD AS THE FENCE OBSTRUCTS THE VIEW OF ON- COMING TRAFFIC. A VEHICLE MUST PROJCCT ITSELF INTO ON- COMING TRAFFIC TO SEE ENOUGH TO NEGOTIATE A TURN, OR CROSS ONTO LVION STREET. IT RIDE9SKATEBOA CHILDREN WILL BE PUT INTO ALONG SAPPHIREAATP FASTLSPEEDS/.9 THEY THE FENCE IS APPROXIMATELY FOUR FEEI TALL AND THESE CHILDREN WILL BE OBSCURED FROM VIEW, ESPECIALLY DURING DUSK HOURS. ALL MOTORISTS LEAVING OUR AREA FnCE TRAFFIC THAT EXCEEDS THE SPEED LIMIT BY A LARGE MARGIN. OBSTRUCTING OUR VIEW OF TRAFFIC PUTS ALL OF US AT HIGH RISK OF INJURY. WE ARE EXPECTING CITY OFFICIALS TO ACT CUICKLY BEFORE ANY OF THESE TRAGIC POTENTIAL SITUATIONS OCCUR. WE ARE PREPARED TO SEEK COURT ORDER TO CEASE C014STRUCTION IF NECESSARY .� I N� ATTACHED IS A SIGNED PETITION OF THE RESIDENTS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOC. , e WE ARE PLANNING ON ATTENDING THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING, ALL OF US SINCERELY•, i (`% /• /Gyp 1 "LiNOA VALENTI f iii y AMENDMENT t 'ITT TO PET I,T-1 ON FOR JR LONG'SAPPHIRE'FROM ALTA" CHURCH' BDUNDRY,'TU',*BAjTVON. I 9 TIiE"0U5RUELh,1 NG Md10RITY . 5 WHO REQUIRE IiIAT 'iAln' I 13 `OF-OVER.00%)� CNSENSJS OF; ,.�F E BE "RE VED NSEI�VATI E R IDENNTS FEEL I 4T: SA 111), 4 B R I . VAIH IS 100 NARROW FOR, PEDIS7,Rl TOs PASS'13AFELY &'EQUESTRIAN VRP1TFIC. - THERE IEI-•No PLACE FOR,,' CHI D', ROSS CHILDREN rl.UST'C 7,0 THE ON A BICYCLE�To -ShM Yij7ijSS! FWYT AQRSE".' .. . 1 .a' -''N OTHER SIDE OF-'S,',PPK,' f''j!F R1131PB'A BICYCLE OR SKATEBOAPDi'fSAPPHI E. i CANNOT •BE-ftAFELY, 'L04pw,T)O77TRAFFIC WHICH CONTINUALLY 11;XCEED9 THE SPEEVLIMIT. �eJ 'j REMOVAL' or SAID FENCE." 40JULD'ALLOW FNOUGH, SPACE'FOR PEDISTRI AND -,RIDERS TO PASS EACH J'allm, F I • ' I - 1; p. ".. 1' FA E Y T�Ai ALSOi,,, YCM THE OPI MI OM, G,F,ll 5 MFRS OF THIa PETITION SAID - AREA 0ANO LAND BE CFJIFJJTED FOR SIDlrWlAVJ.Xlf SCAPING'SE;PROUIDED EY 1HE'CITY._ TREES THAT'.11WERE MOVED ),w0f-FEPL.ANTED IN-THIS WALKWAY ART_ PLANTED MUCH' TO ';.LOSE -IyJ,E%ISTItlGl lJCK WALLS.�IN IKE VERY NEAR, FUTURE THOSE-,!,, 'X.WALLS!WILL BE ROXNED'DUE'70 TREE MDTiVAMAGE. A41REPRES&TATIUE OFjr`HE,;zrNEi9 OF THIS PETITION IjJJILL -CLOSELY. FOLLOW C'tT'/tC0UNC*lL fEACTION AND.RECaMMENDATIONS. SINCERELif,' .'n'LENTI tV 786278A1L4E AVENUE OCTOBER S. 1988 AL•TA LOMA, CALIF 31701 s• ,Cdu>•� ec CITY OF RANCHD CUr4WX BA C/D CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT C/O CITY ENGINEER +. 9320 BASELINE PDAD i, RANCHO CUCAMOWIA, CALIF 91730 y DEAR SCOIT M111PHY, r t i1 TO FOLLOW -UP ON OUR' CONVERSATION OF FRIDAY OCTOBER 7, ISM. WE THE RESIDENIS OF MARBLE AVENUE, AND CELESTITE AVENUE, HEREBY DEMAND ThRI SAID CITY IMPROVEMENT ALOUD SAPPHIRE STREET BE REMOVED. IT I9 A SPFTY HAZARD AS IHE FENCE OBSTRUCTS THE VIEW OF ON- CCMING TRAFFIC. A VEHICLE ML= PROJECT ITSELF INTO ON- COMING TRAFFIC TO SEE ENOUSH TO NEGOTIAIE A TU "Y, OR CROSS ONTO LEMON STREET. IT IS OUR VIEW THAT CHILDREN WILL BE PUT INTO A SPECIAL RISK AS THEY RIDE SKATEBOARDS, AND BICYCLES, ALONG SAPPHIRE AT FAST SPEEDS, THE FENCE IS APPROXIMATELY FOUR FEET TALL AND THESE CHILDREN WILL BE OBSCURED FROM VIEW, ESPECIALLY DURING DUSK HOURS. ALL MOTORISTS LEAVING OUR AREA FACE TRAFFIC THAT EXCEEDS THE SPEED LIMIT BY .A LARGE MARGIN. OBSTRUCTING OUR VIEW OF TRAFFIC PUTS ALL OF US AO HIGH RISK OF INJURY. WE ARE EXPECTING CITY OFFICIALS TO ACT QUICKLY BEFORE ANY OF THESE TRAGIC POTENTIAL SIIUATIONS OCCUR. WE ARE PREPARED TO SEEK COURT ORDER TO CEASE CONSTRUCTION IF NECESSARY ATTACHED IS A SIGNED PETITION OF THE RESIDENIS OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. WE ARII PLAM41NO CN ATTENDING THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING, ALL OF US SINCER1EL� Y,n� /�� /��`�� _INOs VghV /La / /Ef( /1!TI OCTOBER 10, low. AMENDMENT TO PETITION roll RE110UAL OF FENCE ALONG SAPPHIRE TROM AL --W! LOMA CHURCH BfX*MRY'TO BANYON. • "r' r. IT IS TH£ OVERWELMINO'VAJORITY OF'RESIDSNI9 WHO REQUIRE 'II,(AT SAID FENCE BE REMOVED CCON5C2JATIVE EBTIJYIIE.OF,OVER�00%). MWOV•sm OF RESIDENTS FEEL THAT,50,ID,BP,IDLE PATH IS TOO NARROW FOR,',PBDISIRIANS TO PASS SAFELY BY EQt }'LSiRIAN:TRAFFIC.'THEREiIS'NO PLACE FDA -'A CHILD ON A BICYCLE TO- .SAFLL'Y;:PASS- -'ANY •.HORSE:+CHILORl71'11JST CRD!19,;,TD TAE OTHER SIDE OF SAPPHIIlE:•If RIDING A BICYCLE OR SKATEDUARO. SAPPHIRE QNNNOT BF SAFELY CR0`8.4£D. DUL TO TRAFFIC WHICH,',CONTINUALLY EY,CE1405 ,,, THE SPEED LIMIT, a REMOVAL OF SAID PENCE. WOULD, ALLCW LNCAJOH SPACE FOP. PEDI'STRIMSS. AND RIDERS TO PASS EACH OTHER SAFELY. j ALSO. IT 19 THE OPINION OF SIGNERS OF THIS PETITION THAT SAID AREA BE CEMENTED FOR SIDEWALK, AND LANDSCAPING BE PIIO'UI ➢ITJ BY THE CITY. ,Gy TREES IHAT WERE MOVED AND E£PLANIEDIINITHIS WALKWAY ARE PLANtED MUCH r TO CLOSE TO EXISTING BLOCK WALLS. IN THE VERY'NEAR FUTURE THOSE' , BLOCK WALLS WILL HE RUINED DUE TO TREE ROOT DAMAOF.. AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SIGNERS OF THIS PETITION I WILL CLOSELY FOLLOW CITY COVNCIL REACTION AND RECOMMENDATIONS. , SINCERELY, � �s , �.-� LINDA VALENTI ORY£ AURM 9ICNATUR£ _�(-- --- to_C- 38 63s7 N14cb1e 2 �0�8_BH G3SJ _MRY�I� 7Yaed! c. l(,�Q- �~ �.�1 11 �i•• /� Jf - C )ONS T"T(" C f DATE AW*FSS S2GtATLOtE go- 6 -c3R Gme.2 /--- �!:�� - - - -�� q-Z !r icy —,q- 0 l r C4+e it ■N DATE AOORESI 9ICamruxE 0-q -?� bzyc%:e Jos 1,1t lr/sg Gq'S (.2e %c /,*t L' el �C� tx, ---- --- --- ------- ---- - ---- --- --- -- -- - -- - - - - -- --------- -- `ii.5y� � a ri�"�sl��'I'�!� /i7��i(�J s_• .V, ?.��. II e DATE ADDREM SlamTURE ----------- - - ---- ------ -- ------ _ - -E=' ei t - - - -- ---+f / t tll :y DAIE Al v �� 4 non �.P •� .. _ _ � i '.L/ / i .J c "- r �h."'i��5�,�; -;x'X" ibi„� %„ �+ r >t �_. > ., r....�tr. L;• t�.,_, Y l ° 4 Y DATE _ -- At 9IOWTURE e . s - i Il#Wee Ohapief DtVipe 6dweef cox L eoener W effeef 4a f•' Z 0 �a I�Iv� a�Fc 1Fa Sit AO c l Mr view { 1! Pass" e is