HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989/02/01 - Agenda PacketK
r -
J Jl rry
COUNCIL
A G E N D A
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
REGULAR MEETINGS
1st and 3rd Wednesdays — 7:30 p.m.
Februarl 1, 1989
Lions Park Community Center
9161 Base Line Road
Rancho Cucamonga
City Couneilmembers
Dennis L Stout. Rarw
Pamela 1 Wright, Ce..,rr.,,.,b„
Deborah N. Brown, sraor n„r m
Charles 1 Buyue4 Ce.�rr.,,Ab„
William 1 Alexander, C, -. a-mml
Lauren M. Wasserman, an uc.y,r
James L Markman, OfYAM.a
Beverly A. Awhekt. Cy Cn.e
Cny Office. 989-1851 Lions Park: 980 -3145
�' February 1, 1989
AA/0 s+ City Council Agenda
PAGE
1
All Items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in
writing. The doadline for submitting these items is 5 :00
p.m. on the Wednesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's
Office receives all such items.
A. CALL TO ORDER
1. Pledge of Allegiance to Flag.
2. Roll Call: Buquet Alexander Stout
__, _
Brown —, and Nr1gFt _
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS /PRESENTATIONS
C. CONSENT CALENDAR
The ft;lowing Consent Calendar items are expected to be
routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by
the Council at one time without discussion. Any Item may be
removed by a Counciluember or member of the audience for
discussion.
1. Approval of Minutes: November 16, 1988; and December 6,
1938 (Buquet absent); (Alexander not yet sworn in as
Councilmember for these meetings).
2 Approval of Mir-ites: December 9, 1538; December 15,
1988; and December 21, 1988.
3. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 1/18/89 and 1/25/89
1
and Payroll ending 1/19/89 for the total amount of
$919,099.65.
4. Approval to receive and file current Investment
14
Schedule as of January 27, 1989.
5. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer 6 Wine
20
Eating Place for Pizza Hut, Pizza flit of San Diego,
Inc., 6709 Carnelian Avenue.
6 Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer 6 Wine
22
for Public Eating Place for Dragon Exparess, Fina Lee
and Luong Trung Phung, 9028 Archibald Avenue.
�1
City Coune,l Agenda
February 1, 1989
//*-`//1zW`/7
PAGE
2
7. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On Sale Beer b Nine
24
Eating Place for Viuce's Spaghetti House, Inc , 8241
Foothill Boulevard.
8. Approval to relieve Mr. F. Elliot Goldman, a member of
26
the Law Offices of Markman, Arzzynski, Hanson t
Goldmsn, of any and all krosecutorial responsibilities
on the behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
9. Approval to reschedule Red Hill /Heritage Parks' field
28
renovations.
I
10. Approval tc increase the Fee for Phase I to a not-to-
29
exceed amount of $7.500.00 t3 be paid to Fleldman,
Rolapp and Associates (CO 87 -20) for the proposed
Community Facilities District. Etiwanda Highland (88 -1)
from funds deposited with the City by the Caryn Company.
11 Approval of Map. execution of Improvement Agreement,
41
Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to
Landscape Maintenance District NO. 1 and Street
Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for Tract
12895, located or. the west side of Baker Avenue, south
of Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Chung Eli Mao, Suan
Suan Mao and Rancho Citiland Development, a California
Limited Partnership.
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -039
42
A RESOLUTION OF ThE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITY,
AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12895
RESOLUTION 110 89 -040
43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE
MAINIENANCE DISTRICT NO 1 AND STREET LIGHTING
MAINIENANCE DISTRICT 1105 1 AHD 2 FOR TRACT
12895
12 Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for
46
the Street Improvements located on the east side of
Haven Avenue between Church Street and Base Line Road,
submitted by Lew:s Hom3s.
_1.
r'/?-✓."
T
s
PAGZ
City Council Agenda
February 1, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -041 1 48
1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR THE STREET
IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN
AVENUE BETWEEN CHNRCH STREET AND BASE LINE
ROAD
13. Approval to execute a Subordination Agreement (CO 89- I 49
022) for Lot 19 of Tract 7176, located at 0406 Orchard
Street, submitted by Roland L. and Carolyn A. Taylor
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -042 1 50
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION
AGREEMENT FROM ROLAND L. AND CAROLYN A. TAYLOR
AND AUTHORIZING T4E HAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGN SANE
14. Approval to execute contract (CO 89 -023) with Madole 52
and Associates to prepare plans, specifications and
estimates for a storm drain and street improvement
project in and east of Amethyst Street from 19th Stre et
north to Highland Avenue, in the total amount of
$18,276.00 to be funded by Account No. 23- 4637 -8865
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -043 1 53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, TO AWARD AND
EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES OF SAN BERNARDINO,
CALIFORNIA, TO PREPARE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS
AND ESTIMATES FOR AMETHYST STREET AND STORM
DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS FROM 19TH STREET TO
HIGHLAND AVENUE
15 Approval to execute contract (CO 89 -024) for the Jersey 54
Boulevard Storm Drain Improvement Project within
Assessment District 82 -1 located between Utica Street
and H W Oak Avenue, awarded to Laird Construction
Company, Incorporated, for the amount of $135,211.00
($122,918.70 plus 105 contingency) to be funded from
Contract Services Assessment District 82 -1, Account No.
83- 4637 -6028.
PAGE
City Council Agenda
February 1, 1989
16 Approval to execute contract (CO 89 -025) for the 55
Assessment District No. 84 -2 (Alta Loma Storm Drain)
Improvement Project located between Alta Loma 6usin No.
3 and Hermosa Avendo awarded to Colich and Sons for the
amourt of $238,343.00 ($226,993.00 plus 5% contingency)
to be funded from Assessment District No. 84 -2, Account
No. 80- 4637 -6028.
17. Aporoval to execute Heal Property Improvement Contract I 56
and Lien Agreement (:0 29 -026) submitted by Edward C.
and Roxana N. Cardoza for tie property located at 8575
Bella Vlstd Drive.
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -044 1 57
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
00. RANCHO CUCP.MONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A
REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN
AGREEMENT FROM EDWARD C. AND ROXANA M. CARDOZA
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
SIGN THE SAME
18. Approval to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 (CO 83- I 59
053) to add local drainage designs to the Church Street
Widening Project, from Archibald Avenue to Haven
Avenue, by Norris - Repke, Incorporated, in the amount of I
$13,110.00 to bring the Contract total amount to
$56.410.00 to be funded by Account No. 22- 4637 -8753.
19 Approval to execute Contract Change Order o 1 (CO 87- 60
021) for modification of plans, spe, cations and
estimates for the Amethyst Street Recorscruction, Storm
Drain and Traffic Signal at 19th Strict Project, as
required by CALTRANS for Norris - Repke, Incorporated, in
the amount of $7,385.00 to bring the Contract total
amount to $14,385.00 to be funded oy Account No. 22-
4637 -8749.
20. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I I 61
and II for the proposed Sierra Madre Av +ue and Placida
Court from Arrow Highway to Via Car Illo Drive and
issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor,
�G ,
PAGE
City Council Agenda
February 1, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -045 62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED SIERRA
MADRE AVENUE AND PLACIDA COURT FROM ARROW
HIGHWAY TO VIA CARRILLO DRIVE
21. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I 74
and II for the proposed Avenida Ve,1ar Street
Improvement from Grove Avenue to Sierra Madre and
Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therofor
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -046 75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A
CATEGORICAL EXEHPTIOII FOR THE PROPOSED AVENIDA
YEJAR STREET IMPROVEMENTS FROM GROVE AVENUE TO
SIERRA MADRE
22. Approval of Intention for Reimbursement of the cost of 86
Master Plan Storm Drain construction along Vineyard
Avenue in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit 87 -26,
located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Vineyard Avenue.
RESOLUTION 110. 89 -047 87
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUNTY OF SAIL BERNARDINO.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, OECLAPING ITS INT<NTI011
TO EXECUTE A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH
O.A.S. INVESTORS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
PORTION OF THE MASTER PLAN STORM DRAIN LINE
(2K) ALONG VINEYARD AVENUE FROM CUCAMONGA
CREEK CHANNEL TO 549 FEET EAST OF CENTERLINE
OF CARNELIAN STREET
23 Approval of Environmental Assessment and Tentative 90
Tract 13738 - Rodine Company - confirming a City
Council decision made on January 18, 1989, for an
appeal of Pldnning Commission conditions for a proposed
residential subdivision located west of Sapphire
Street, south of Almond Street (APIs 1061 - 091 -03).
PAGE
City Council Agenda
February 1, 1989
RESOLUTION NO. 89 -048 1 91
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAIONGA, CALIFORPIA, APPROVING A
REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13730, TO PERMIT
DEVELOPMENT OF AN 18 -LOT RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION ON 12.88 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY
LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND LOCATED SOUTH OF
ALMOND STREET AND WEST OF SAPPHIRC STREET -
APN 1061 - 091 -03
24. Approval of a general guide to reservation policies for I 110
facilities under the direction of the Community
Services Department. The guide includes categories and
guidelines to determine priority usage 4nd attaching
fees associated with use.
25. Approval of a policy statement and guide to the use of I 117
parks and fields during bad weather. Procedures
Include determ4ning playability and notification of
cancelled usage.
26. Approval of the Conceptual Development Plan for the 120
"Victoria Vineyards South" Park, as recommended by the
Park and Recreation Commission with comments by the
Planning Commission.
0. CONSENT ORDINANCES
The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the
time of first reading. Second re. jings are expected to be
routine and non - controversial. TIP- .11 be acted upon by
the Counr at one time without discussion. The City Clerk
will re the title. Any item can be removed for
discussion.
RECOMMENDATION TO ESTABLISH A SPEED LIMIT OF 45 MPH ON
19TH SMET FAUTTUNVEOCTO—AN BENITO AVENUE.
Continued a from 18, UK
ORDINANCC NO 390 (second reading) 1 123
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMORGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING
SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY
CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON
CERTAIN CITY STREETS
C
City Council Agenda
February 1, 1989
E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
The following items have been advertisea and /or posted as
Public hearings as required by law. The chair will open the
meeting to receive public testimony.
1. No Items submitted.
F. PUBLIC iGS
The requirements. The Chair will legal on publication emeeting to recefvf
public testimony.
1. MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -71 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS the cond tons of approve for e app
grading and paving of approximately 12 acres of land
Industrial SpecificwPlann(SubaMinim located on
tethe
south side of Jersey Boulevard between Utica and
Vincent Avenues Continued from January 18, 1989.
RESOLUTIJN N0. 88 -704
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN
APPEAL OF MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87.71
LOCATED AT 10807 JERSEY BOULEVARD IM THE
MIMINIIM IMPACT /HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
(SUBAREA 9) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
G. CITY WAJIAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
The following Items do not legally require any public
testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for
Public input.
1 THE ETINANDA SAN SEVAINE AREA RASTER PLAN OF DRAINAGE
Area ste rPlan W Drainage Report,Etiwan a an eve ne
PAGE
126
134
137
gc
PAGE
City Council Agend!
February 1, 1 98 9 8
RESOLUTION NO 89 -049
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
ADOPTING THE ETIWAHDA/SAN SEVAINE AREA MASTER
PLAIT OF DRAINAGE REPORT
2. GROWTH MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE.
N. COGKIL BUSINESS
The following items have been requested by the City Council
for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although
the Chair may open the meeting for public input.
1. DESIGNATION OF 4 VOTING DELEGATE AIID ALTERNATE FOR THE
i I MCITUS ASSOCIATION,
2. REPORT ON OUST CONTROL IN DEVELOPMENT AREAS (BUquet).
3. REPORT ON GRADING OF LABOR CAMP (Wright).
4. ALTA LORA CHANNEL RECREATIONAL TRAILS (Stout).
I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT N ETING
This Is the time for City Council to identify the items they
wish to discuss at the next meeting. These Items will not be
discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next
meeting.
J. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
This is the time and place for the general public to rddress
the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from
addressing any Issue not previously included on the Agenda.
The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for
a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five
minutes per Individual.
139
140
141
142
145
146
rr•;4"
1
City Cruncil Agenda
February 1, 1989
K. ADJO9RMENT
1, Beverly A. Autholet, City Clerk of me City of Ranchu
Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy .f the
foregoing agenda was rested on January 71, 1999, seventy -two
(72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at
9320 -C Base Line Road.
PACE
i
�1
45
t%W
=aaa
i
a
+�
b
°�
u
v
i
arN NSas <
abaww• -ruNbr -
e
bb
p
. w:
�
u
u
obNwubuwbNab• -o
w
+' P
)M
N
a
P�
n
f
T P i�
Y
r
001irr�r��)f
m
°
° i
i
G
°o m..ar�.•b �[nY
P
�
n
�
ii zsi °C�yrc'r�'�.R
s
�
f
i
i» •o••
µ
m»
-s•
r
�
T i iiiwbm.�Nn�T
�
�
.°• y
n
N n
^
.Y.i
a :T�z n•
„•
w
N
o
.•
t nm
Y
P
r
c
' 'rm
^ i�
�
^
�
i
n
y
•a{
V• i^ <
w
o
m
YY C
YAK
N
ti
<
•
y
�
N
N M i
N
P
.- •.�M= cacS+inon�.�.
u
w
y o�
o
^ a .<O.
�
'^
.Y•P az.•vancz�ea
v
n
s
.�• c.. °rm•
�
is i
�
v
�
n
n nz s �a��N �Z
e
s
i
r
r
T
w P
M
r
N .°•^.
tnn° n °N mI m•^w
r
i r
i.•
n
�
ia••
P
m
11
.e ° im
a
r o
o
� u
n
r°•
v cr
y
T
s
o
v
a
r
z
n
i
i
of
ii
� "
5
'"
m am•
^
o
:
o
u
eNUaN
m
..
•
NiNa osoa_oaayac�a�y?,a
NNNNO�YNNNNNNNNNNNN�N
°c °ua,
°per °o ° °�
°e
°a
u
o
•,P
^•°,��
a0000aoa »PN:��P�aia::�v;;..
�o:•_•.sod
s
i
• b
r
w
°m
n
z
a
n
ii rR
is
;a
s°
r
aVwppp Wy�pbpO. d..J ✓PPNNaYNMNMNNNMNNOyVNpNNrNN
'
Na+ JMNJ. �VN�JpVJb +aaVNiNwNVNVyJ•4VWVdVPf4ff
If
b
°. °...°i.i °e >.>.i
nnnSD<b2�1l�.. �rpy yTF
V_S pines e'•ry >NNnyNp�:a
;
< }�2rSNNYnCAVC Vw
y}.
_20 I• C1D�� Oi9G G
A p NN T_nn
r
pb020002 >nM >YAOV
Tfl NZZYmr.y[ Y SNMnn
mT^ i A
�. .1 O�Vnm nr._.
<� �Jm
I
1
OYOOn>Nex'l�nY ria
lCYTYOJS<L OnnAnr
C
-,b (m m ^ ym rmS
iv
ti
p>A
i w
sT °yblo :il °�-- 2. °d *TTV�1mo
c'�FS yTya r°„m
t ma >'JeO NI��.n
m..
.Y.S N.,.oi�'r'p
'n"i'Y�}°•
; 2
-z.�i qQ�
nvnyJAy[ JT
iZ�i <�rM�i$�r�
i n
n✓
y Oy >m.wN (1T y yOnwmm
n T
r. •�
0M1.1A
1
nAA�I »_n2M2
>NV
Si..Ti
NA
Ni
nATm n^i'•
i N
N>rnFis
n iGi
n
I
i Ntroy °_.°- y.>.imat. >SrNTm
r EY:NNNT� '^
z£v i o^.. •. n »rA..mmr
AsrmxDN^N��F ^iVymmm> mas i
zF >TO ynm 2vJ iT
m >7O 20 NOm�Z>yV2 >nY n >ymr
T3 OOOn nCD �. Nn mD ^ >OOOTnrM> COZnn IN
SR TS°M: OY IImY mT wmSyOrn nC+m ^iVi.M NmAy In
900 O V m SYOONN >Y.. nn TJ ID
TT ^O I" •2 Alym± -fO..N O O y j
<S t>IN y •( R.ci.NYN4N QC •fw }�N 2 I
+i N O T n J`I •"I N DS�=r MP n 1
nnn }I pny n nf'n �hn yrn ^ynnnm Nn x
n < <rw O r mV 1
^c00y C oO yT nRi>COOw Pv
��nm 't •1 n m Vmn ^S fZiT ui
TLnT rD n D A �6T T ° }i >U YD M
N .'..i„ 3 N .Y•• N N N N N r.i M ;'.'., i o
I
YN VN YNNNNNNNNNNNNN 1( 0
aaa a ^adaLLnnnaaa��e�T Taam pa aaaaaadade aTnaaa ryas Ir i
4NNNNNMNN�.n. �.^.rrr r000 In '
+P •1r•�r�OdbJp wwyN.y. mapMR••wyN� -ma 2_.,. Nw yrOOmV Y
n
I l r
n
'NnO.+ +nOVONO•Y.�P 4Y•ij ✓P .Y.NCJa n +O�RM IC +fjN 01 yNd
O?OONY .0 N
nacuNr, ,00R000Opoarow.n°ooro�WrJnPrNON
JR CnffC••R nnOyROyOn000✓O ^OpYC �.�OY 1N000P +0+
2
t
0
VIUVNJ JP U JN}yPNfyO bNO Z:.:: �rNNldy PraryNdVu
PNyMPGTP.r PfppO JrVYUP JI.VNN \.V VJO...•.V rJJJyf J.P.P 1M
°S ^nOa T°S Pf}im�a�00.. nA•1A O.�2 MMNSSm�TTTaY}j
�oiea .tsmay ^°n`ii �jO ln.T- „.a�in"itn4Nr�s y.r..yosT
rla�w. 4932 0 �•
iTONOryyT nwr ..iTn7m^ ii'oz «a�Lamo„ r2+�i.°iv„
T•'2aNe�rn. M ^a n °ire° oiavc.^^^..a...i Y°.n i”' ipnQNr
aNO v e-ni�li « }nz
ceNr .mi ti am rT
�S
oa, �l•�i ggya rti .�r
mEna •'
om
n mn
r }�MbYMC.NiOTyGf'.m.Angg.n TnmAO<tiYSY GN.Nna.nn<M�aypaT
1p
°iitan.N1.�iosM
Cr „SiGi.�KMw rr.v °m'1wwYT .„Nn290S mDt23..ry .„r.2. m
_ __ __ O T.rn t=1C wt}fN f°ir w•...n .. � „ � <u..TT }!
awt.
ec
4}
�
--
mal _. �lti'nP Nn Gm°
I-r r r 0 ^Ommn
^•^n'
't=N
o° a
Y`SfZ
n
DnNnm.- wDr
<MmmmOrSaP
g
sy
}
r•
N
�eT GVnm
9
` TN
y..0 N
NtN2m
N
}L
°m ^a�PN
��pp TN
^
.yry
•D..D
ANT
n
M�Nn
<ir .ni
r
nm0..
�.
TDN
tT�
T PI'•N
N
nn
n nn
nnn t1 �nni
nn2 ONn
m
00
0 0°
nor 2 8oym
.5..
rT
So
o�A no
°
T TT
TS Y.S SN
L
MSS SS
rA
a va
as o pn
}
r
m
s”
O
Y n
m .o
°w
r
N D N =
NN N SS T� n nm m .r.�n T I
N ✓ r w w .�. v .Sn �
N 1
NNN NN NNNNNNNNNNNNN .•NNNNNNMNNNNNNNN ;i �
eaT aaaaaaaaaaaaadaaaa eJaaaaadn mean °mm�saaao } }
Tmmo-mmPmbPnmmmmm n�,e'± 1 y
6rP b�wNrOyp rpN }yV�Cam rPl Cj,y NPO N..N MVP
-oJmra Nf YNroam i
i }
- i
r aY od
dov w N1 Y••ros.O ° !
+or..goi =
rPro�m . 000rPdoYY�
+-- e.00�a °O.':o oeooYi °�Ir"a"a000P -N :.00$rboNO Nr..
No OuNrn.•Y OOaPP OOO Pao -oN_.. 1'�
��I
a
1�
J
1�
i�
r
�t
0
UW�pu�.fiV MJ PFl�MrPNNNNPyyppNrU+ \��pMMNONOa �+
JMr U�pN YryPrNNNVOOpNpMOPNMPPfPNJUmPPyrNUNJ 1 r
t
•OnOSiSr2 Sr.SS�TJ 'fS SJnrTrTr STT4r .. r�. IT p
Tzr +orwy�y an nAn r>r xm ri izz i u
vmav ec -sQ Tyi nannmo r rM zzr� °s err 1
r :m Yo�rrr zirmanaTV ,TT a
o n zvoevNJJn o srrr+ .. ^Try��v�zOi »irii i -r.
cfN � z >Y zNr ..rs z i vv N
yTe 1 r zir,rrG >ri..rnm zg yr � o i�er y
ti A�xrrr zz .. Jtizm nn amrrinmT+ ei �c zm i
nrm n o oaf nrrJC< A o� mm 1 w
zy :n or. Nrnat< iJV zzn N �.nn� °.^.IZ >z �ji
y�+c+
SnNr ?O rnm {N('2 AASx+RS SrA�Or ^M .21 Q?pN i n
O jay r.0i yma NS � nWT >_•[ C_�M_S Tr yyyyy _00 1 y
•.°IS �r r +y nYnnn o Syr m o5
rn y � rr + vrz yo c z vN 1
O Y fYl yO P iSl n .Ni n T U r
n i N • 1
.� nom
n ;
Ta
Twe +aNnJNSN�. Nn �eNwrxxNa >Mesr.arzJCWnalirNe i
rTrmmr>mmmciym .en.mrm9n rrmn.vzcmmo amr
.im .yv.zz +u.z vmPrr yw+ ovMao y,n�r yzoz.
<+m�Tr mcnm�iarvoc eaJa�o iJ
yam ymr 'AA�j JO A.'.Jr> �t6- Y IJ
rrr nn<N> < ♦1 SmTlnn PmYTE AJ m
.erNmw n�vNwnJw�:. mn p..m rya >mNJ.nE z i•
�rrzzNZ z 401, n nomr vmy 'xrym� No�J.Tis iv
Nov9 �^i s
N�TN i+nA n vma a v T+ NoN cmrrm N"'i >AZ 1
gm i n
+znN vm ..m., avm pzaar zNtirJ y
aN rd ii n n s T u c pa o +q ica zT zr 1
as i
dim ^or� i �.•'.. mfr r °v .m^iv -r ton N to Ma �
OP .P.^
t pnTA r x O n 1
N n> nnh TM� oy0i by n T lmnnn nh ;
O. O Ono mti� �yy]e= O; C f ynyyP y0 1
ZP S nTm O NOy mb m immnn +Z.n
nS m ann O Va A D+ ATaun Sa i A
a i >
z
+o n
T:•'. z
N « Ny'.H m �� N N rriziMM SM �
i
i n
aaaaa �aaacaaaaaaaaoaaaa `.e.ua �aaaae�as <enao i� i
.N,`. .f. °uNN'�w+°.•°•.N- .N.��= %�� ='n 'off
P 1� ooconepz $.iaaoPN a ° <e it b
NmJP n: +NroaoyPNfJNroapy oaP PNf..urva
1
n r
_ S V
f i
MSOC.... .... .. +i .. .. ........ . +
P. °.oNn o.i lOi: on °o += vi °�+ov.•o o��a aP °a °oo °o ov °O= Nosy °v oo °v'o
1
I
1> .1.
IK m
im
a
Im
1
1
1 �
I 4
s
a
i
s
m
=Dw> ann en n naDD :o} an n a
n
N NNwNNNNwNNNwNwNNNN N. NNNNwN VaNNNNNNNNNN r0.
a <aaaaaaaaaa aaaad aa��app °e as dd °a rdadaaa aaaadaaaa i� i
�P4PPPPPPPPN�� ddPa�nN l !!')WVwu'�uuu�d �n
OapyPp +VNrOd P.•ONJyN "OdT+i1P P+VN +0a0yP Vyi +uNrO 7
r Ny
> 4
Po+ _tea °on.�� °w dd uuN..yi .yv+ "o rr- yua`oyNsPyNo V M
i
±N�iowtlo:ou..NJrv�M,'. wi)v:redmyo�eyyyi.r ri.N�� 1
0 omvPO -n+v P•+oo +Na..amom:v -c. v..o �~
!t
1
7C,—
�'
N.°..".auveaNm gfJma P.YO °v�.rv+.y)uo.`Ja vNrr+v+
.Y.
.Y.Y$i .N.�P
�dyrrNpNPPONrmOP+ J.OPPOOrdNdNrdyNYONd +Mym
t�'.
rr
N •.NN N Nnyyy).ananiy4444444`4 «444044
OOOOOOT�mrN.n T> m y 00.-. �.`. TS }Yy »>
y
cccyr >�yrMZZni<V�wfao= �>izn oOC4OA xng4•Y- .nnnnnnnn
>n >TL• r�n2 S
O.. 1 }.....mm
TmTx = }Nr•••i.� }OprrDml Sr SZma 2 20mK r
DDAOT•2•N Zm n °nriI.LOMOOC >�yT•O'.'n ppn�DyTiT
K }SOOnn.K D�
Yf f�
CZC
nn mm�nyNO 0n2•.001"N.•n }nZOO "aCwNl°Tx4•yOTx
ti
r�
N. y anNM'mICS2mN>OS r Sm nl Y ^1Np
rr� YN TTy� O G 2 =.JOY OSp
•+-... ° o Nrmnm N ooy N 2=1 y.•n �°NNCmc.�
'
ooco }mz iii'.: .nrm nz K nn..
a nzN
fi.
y. (. N a••T OotN rnr
nr<o .Y}..n (�
KYr DHo
'i
LxzZ O N «.\.}>m ^i. 1c� )• ° '..v.
^ ^'^•• 'n ••a ymv °a manor T� -N or 4 N�o
na.• n
0 Aa
NS N9}°Orf
•
ya n
>
nfi a
!'
ro .mn oi.^ n b. < oi: N
i4 n.
°x r MM
4o8n
ni o y zN
gK n<
•
•-a N 111 N
m o T
wedmyx
Nx.
y vx r A
le C o zr I
�^=.4.>nJm.E. 4:c
r Y`4"o C
N9on M} :a Mn.V rn m°n'4n
:>i.ozn}.4o .ia .N.y • .m.ynm
� °vynm):.om4 r r 1 °.
=Nc.T 4
nn Nom4.� >m
} nr .
a n :o i
Y>.YNSVmN n.J�n4n.n -+ � Nn).N >..N xna} nnn4 i
.+N aroma <NN.
nTKmzxr4 n+. o nNU <n .• mnoy
° ^c rNn^ `•
zrizo y nn^.oz aez ai.G..obr
N�m .n...a..
Nrem4nr yN: �� m^m a�l}nr
TM xz n
5A n. t '} y0 y
D00
AJT 9r.>iN Nft
o mar o s ••
�m n
m
m
Nn n n nnn r n nnnn nr nn n n
Yyo� c o0o t" m o 0 0°°x o c° e° c
NTZS z iT�� s'o T i iTz zz
i
1> .1.
IK m
im
a
Im
1
1
1 �
I 4
s
a
i
s
m
=Dw> ann en n naDD :o} an n a
n
N NNwNNNNwNNNwNwNNNN N. NNNNwN VaNNNNNNNNNN r0.
a <aaaaaaaaaa aaaad aa��app °e as dd °a rdadaaa aaaadaaaa i� i
�P4PPPPPPPPN�� ddPa�nN l !!')WVwu'�uuu�d �n
OapyPp +VNrOd P.•ONJyN "OdT+i1P P+VN +0a0yP Vyi +uNrO 7
r Ny
> 4
Po+ _tea °on.�� °w dd uuN..yi .yv+ "o rr- yua`oyNsPyNo V M
i
±N�iowtlo:ou..NJrv�M,'. wi)v:redmyo�eyyyi.r ri.N�� 1
0 omvPO -n+v P•+oo +Na..amom:v -c. v..o �~
!t
1
I�
uWN vJJ`ua .ra <.sp ra ..urW
�
N
+1.
NOO�prVVVI.Y NrI r'NW WNNNN
10
�
p."d JYr O-ip OpvVNr F�WPNNVOY
;�
p
Xr`
NIY•r0 m$T(.C•O'r lNr r- 1YNNNNN
Z n..Y1 nT.n2Tm >C4�.an
'
p
.J
vmoa:� yy�N i amnonm.>�i
Im
I
d
��•
n>
^'i'�
Y.zi.xxnavoloaSu M >��.°,
i
•
i�>nrr o• -••+m irn Nan°.�2 rte'
•°.
x
yr Oa miS7iz z•°n j1 w n[mDrN
�
t
CN } >... Z•+I'. n)' pZ Yyan29
1
x
p
r�.ppr. c�.z•.S <czi >m °•.i
a
�D.>i
oo°
O�2 A<
il0 >
=m �• r 07 m
m Na
Z.
i
N
n °•°z
n (1 [��i
�N
9 n C
O n <•
1
I
z
1
= n
?5
i
>9r YOnr mxbTm� W
��
�MO.�era "6Z
'T
nOP y 1 O..AOOZr32Pp
1
i
In
rZr a p1 Ci00anr90ro=
m�V O n OOODaN �.}i
1
sr np^
i
^+nn nnnpmm�r .'rn n +iN
c
°cc o0 ooY•z rm c °
miZ..T Tm mz m
r
° m
ann an aaY D a
N
VYNYNNNN
LOa�adiOdC
1:
n
(°.
G•ifwidy�dydd d dad
enddddooeadd•�addo d
Ys
ddld pp•>6pp -I �.... -IV rYVN
u - oO °e °a- .�.•wuN.�odpro•NJWV-
�a
>
n
P
ID
>
J'D •rdOPP�NdpuJN
m
w4JdN
wVPNNNnrOUd..JVe w�lpNPrN
P
p.
O
NVWPO4.°i.P N]°iO N�OOOPWWp,pw
NY/
S
N
i
NNN N r
OOOV POJMOPI. uY_ O N NN yy N r
PN.W mYPVO Nr fVre Atli W tl N � � Y 1> N
m mrtlimNCfr.^ i m ?e Y VO tle Y
I<
nm 3mn> nr nr-i: � g zw � z
S aLmp > /Nm 13i3i ^o > nm rm r m '
>NYr9Z YnOCO � n aA <K y1 � A 1
ZOrOw > On9C TY��T >m O mN 99 T} O T 1 y
^2C3AF0>NNT99 N
>mTYOOy NT >N r Z A� F ; T
"'OA 2219 >nKT 1 (� f'C fr i nA ySS 1
a�NNOmN39 % y 11r11 AY %J[TC m (� O Y p O n L
On 1
nzw n a S-zmr dv i m R. Q` m e
n H o
N n
n n
_ _ 1
n 1
A 1
>Dnnnf'N FO
99-"'g < mD < < G <
FrT�Y9SO.0iy09� �w3NNrm hOi � f3lq �rmi g
T��C >nym�N 9 mySSrC O O r 00 O O O O
nTO FI'D� aCnOr Tml p>OKO � n Nn nn n N n N �T
NSTyN 3` ww1C OOA «1N > �T E 1. r .T ; 3
F.Y.o p mr
T T 9
NL °s< lc mr Lfo Tt'121 TN
ANp3�Dia'+ Fy �S i m QT 1
NneOUmr rT
oz sF Y. +n n.°+� omnr n i nt i
nwz oa oi. mmo o n oP
•m arr nT
is, T z z mm
r m'nPFD 2 n D a 9>
'. r�o °OTm "• N e me e.".'° °P .eie a..s i i
am . Y i °n2 0TF n
oo °N o
n
0000'io o�onuoo ooaaoaeaaaaaaaa�oNN N"'"'NNNN '
oeeeatla$eo is
�mOU.o�m000 oy aatlaeetltivPyyyyy rp pla.... r� P
oamo b'oy'o ao ° °eaaeo�i�uYem+
fY +- oemypNiNNroamy�.+. dmoam m.��.amu+eo ae Pa �s i
>
'1 9
_p_ _oNWNfV ,f f yi N r
NO.f O tee.. `tea m °$mV p OP O m O O 13 r
°s 8:•'�.m.Lo u.,rSro oib <b..b p ..b NL N o r
OCTVOVe +O OpOUONO P VO eb O O m
YNNr puN Nn•NN b
lfPP��ONa.°.,ti sawCJPVp0N•°}yMOICrVy °�NPMP�NO �P
mm° NwoovvavvrpwwpsvNaovoNVm- NwuaEwa.+. -.. +l.a
n^n^ (�N ^n a�TSmrNrmrgamLm..mrzempmmm t >t�>t
STT >�S > APS A°ON°Tr Z•'•riyYC ECKDT2T
iDDTjrq^°NIyrNKTED >s 9PC SNNDYN T >Npm..Ln
GDa
D. KI.m.n ST. _tr°D°DYm>T•M1 ^i+SV mDi P•+SYOyS
KDNTLD3mKr jjrTTm1Tm20q °OwKT^mimN= ^�P YD
2 ^K �+ n.° i2N• P +G�ZSmmmKPGDm.°j`pnTKTTY_OrTOwm jy Sp°
GTf Af S(.� T =�;pCOO �f O >yZ TTT WSJ KT� nOKCTOIq]Da
Y� °Tam C°' r J^.CNp� °m -°q OPZd m ^DIG`D TSY <12ST
Kz in ^rowem�
> 2 P °N T 'S f1nDT a
2 N P
r Z Z y_>> C
K
1 2 n
qN n V D y0
l
O •'• Y m 2 O
Y°sc°^..a..�.P••e as ^•'f N•a.. �.gm•D...a•..a..^
r. TeTT.. -.zzv 2 Sz.
mmN yo pzr orvvw oho oc
T Div °agi :.°'D O +aue�N�
P
sppr> CC mNifN9P•l,�VpD
NAO��y plOVP�$Nm pia
fO \TOT Ayy•'•pf10m DN
TOif.T f. r p � i
L pT p po
NST m ! P
yL
owNmp:
zzF�Te
a4 °al
J enl
•p •� O T° =1yN
IK N
iT I
T P
I a
I
1
1 ^
D>
s
T
u
NNa -• r � s - r iN � on + NM °
z
^
000 o.Ni000'�op�co 000°o8"oo covua8ppQp
oou0000000 00000 li
pppMCY °!pV>00!lOOI,l� .•w°pi •°i °u°•�YU�uN ° » °^°•NN°. °-p0
PNw,.••..- oaw.. cN >.,.N..oamvcN!•..N- oagvPJiVN- oaova
a '+ w
Novlow.ciao.... eoo:+o......N -om -:. oaovoo
.......... ,.op000 o3'.$NOVPCONpNpK I
ORM
e-- rin°. °Pwuro l°c .". °w� °aQNes000u�yeoaouoa: WaNOao
dWdyVNrpNPMMNN r. >q ymVOIPWrWNdrNVMYNV yMJV�
pnn aonTTSioT�Nmnym zsm:mi °o.°.r v•WCi .......... nAn �r
3T ;TOSmNZTTir. ZTmr nN°mTNTrS3 nf1CZDVDO
m201m TTm °. Y O >O TTN�DNO >n sK iVT• nTYn�my »L_S.i K. r%DmK
3D >Nn ZI�Z Z2 +f mNy Sr+1Ny OOOrmND000 n SV K'T
0°m9 Y m >.. OTY
nom
KVn2nrOr » N SSSnDD
ZOm >A ZOTfFTn Or> <2 >Nn00 N..n Of2
zoiMm�'c z °9Nm> o >N
Z i Nz >zrr .�cr»>g ne.
co 0.. 9..Ni MN..'eT
«n -.1-�° < mnmmshlr D<e>mz .� +.... _..
pA- �c.-Yr �cNTNmNmaTOn •va r!m! ni+ c -T-
anmT.miVmW9 .T+.�.T�.Of tmNpyaN NO<09TD� >1�1 >P19L Ar
�NNmDK r.P 9a
nyN �n d�orY mnnmi99ym o .W.oFWNm Tm �11°): 7!">z�n
m n� ma. »<ra�:.i z� °aN aDND�� N'2 z1amNNOs
`. g :muTiN Tyi� o0;4: Z S
�oTO�ig or
$atis -• ..N F..oT:,D, °d
nn in m�i nW K>oN's =� n��i n " n.no na° n 'omo`yn
�o �10 � °m oPTaTT nRy� ° orer.o.-11� ce.- aTOa
Zm yT T W V! mI.N T Z AYZm TS•] 1222
m>n mD
rA D O
i+
1(
im °a
1
1 V
i w
1 x
1 >
i a
I �
N
n
A
` T D P N Df•M O DD D
NN ONw N °raY m K In .n m N NVr mT n
n
d° o° o•° oo° o$.° OO °oo °o$$ °oS °$o °o ° ° °o °o °oo$ °oon $P °oo °o °°oo °o °
°o o
Kaa.. i�a> •ia•oaw- °in�°>�m.�°..°.�moeeroa i,"..�..�'.oam Sao o. io. �o':lo� �:
_ 9
.o.. °W'.N..>.N.W°... °•N :rrr .. - oYr- '��+.1 .- oW�NOUN•o m.. wo m
. d>N..aY ro °:.%PVWUm>WPOe >N..roi�':oomWW
: �oyoa- P. :.�a.'.'�aoNY�e�0000000 °Yn°PY.. irNCOO.+ ooeM1±
a000a 0000>oo00+o.1ooa + aNOP$
r
_ mD
K
rr
>
F
L
c`m
i
n
pA- �c.-Yr �cNTNmNmaTOn •va r!m! ni+ c -T-
anmT.miVmW9 .T+.�.T�.Of tmNpyaN NO<09TD� >1�1 >P19L Ar
�NNmDK r.P 9a
nyN �n d�orY mnnmi99ym o .W.oFWNm Tm �11°): 7!">z�n
m n� ma. »<ra�:.i z� °aN aDND�� N'2 z1amNNOs
`. g :muTiN Tyi� o0;4: Z S
�oTO�ig or
$atis -• ..N F..oT:,D, °d
nn in m�i nW K>oN's =� n��i n " n.no na° n 'omo`yn
�o �10 � °m oPTaTT nRy� ° orer.o.-11� ce.- aTOa
Zm yT T W V! mI.N T Z AYZm TS•] 1222
m>n mD
rA D O
i+
1(
im °a
1
1 V
i w
1 x
1 >
i a
I �
N
n
A
` T D P N Df•M O DD D
NN ONw N °raY m K In .n m N NVr mT n
n
d° o° o•° oo° o$.° OO °oo °o$$ °oS °$o °o ° ° °o °o °oo$ °oon $P °oo °o °°oo °o °
°o o
Kaa.. i�a> •ia•oaw- °in�°>�m.�°..°.�moeeroa i,"..�..�'.oam Sao o. io. �o':lo� �:
_ 9
.o.. °W'.N..>.N.W°... °•N :rrr .. - oYr- '��+.1 .- oW�NOUN•o m.. wo m
. d>N..aY ro °:.%PVWUm>WPOe >N..roi�':oomWW
: �oyoa- P. :.�a.'.'�aoNY�e�0000000 °Yn°PY.. irNCOO.+ ooeM1±
a000a 0000>oo00+o.1ooa + aNOP$
r
R•'
�'
•t
•r rNrr rNNNNN
OOd000dVPNAdVi00 NOOOd r OOOOd d..O dPOO IO Vd
dJmNPOdNNrrOOdf
.V
r
PfONNdJJNPVyyNdOPUPNyrJM _10 �q
.d PNddPJNOOVPPJONPVPVMPVU
yy,I
�+•
lmJplN ¢ dJr N_INPOK IY N
."r02nNL } } +11i }¢Pn } }rPL._. '
>mOCyYi S..r TY2 w__w ._. w.. {{,� >SSL.- ISOSrV
1s On�mOOrZY.•9wm
Yi2aDTwCQOm2
DNY
DTT T/'mO0 >n^m�rlmSTiONO >p y ;�" d
x'''
_D
mm.0y'a ^P iNY N Y>_CMO nT�m a• S 1
}wtV' V'q r2TyKT
Oa
_T'aNmy_m
1' u Y @TD Y ��w •Oi ^_01 ; .^•.
>j'S
yA
}
9SPY2 TSTµ�T
^ SAO n2DY91P 1 ~
}Y
ONN�YYLp w.Ai yS^OTmCOmrO
<p
T9Y_O >aA1w�TFry9 �uny.+pywr
T
{,
-`
>q �T «9Tg2YY 1
yy
DCZ� K.°+ y OOTSm9Y y9-ITY CC
T(ly
}Dp iy« ±YO< ;
oMOimy
m.sY PK i a
a'on
fT T i
f
'• z
M1 .
i
NS
do
y.
1
TuNyyYJ Df >NO yuDnmNVOmO lY yV T 29g92>amO D a99< '
•N 'O.5mOOlmwq Oypw1 mY.nmC Cn�m IrY 1
r «�ooMDPrnFwM+i
g9iom «ooawyz�e m.L.
vr+.m.."..r..^.T ioTOND M
ix
oo>emmzzo. mlR•mi+z NmnTa as .N} Nam «+i
mN�Mwfrrn }JDmN n <wT.+J '• �T
Sn Nao'rrM"'D z -NZZ >im uO J.wm:
OT'
~YVOm'jrmm \SwMr n mTmm f10 �ynNNVmP uww pNDP �N
Owr +.00000
mPD(p�
Om 1n
+Y'.m 1 qqY «00 n0 1 D
OOOOm
Kr9 Y_D• pa- •N1aY< <fM < OfLaj9 DMDaPDT}
I I CO '19 °q vOw mN�mll OY'DfLP O'��
wT
0 wg
NppT>fTA r pp
1�OIS .inq TP!.O 1
O�•yaD OV_' 9_y S -pP
�'
dA m'YLP °SSnO SVn_I .P.q• 1' 1
r�. q
N.Oi
1
PMn TYZ` �O
O OPO fm� m0
_y
00 ST r K
n �"• mm�J
V 1
m F nn S �z D
wL t
y
N ;
n
0000 00o oo oZ5roo'o oo i
oo0ae0.a 0
-oo
00. ,s
mo�oa�vooio.N..roo= N rO OODnPOOOO Qd iaa o
i:0P N.0.ome ia': :..N .rod m..PNlNNrodn z
}
cry m
d op JrMJ�NepmoN:NNernlaNNONrN. ii .
n = °P SOO + °°n`•++o �n.y.P °OP`�g,°.nJ°°o K- .°N..N o.•
VyoreNP�.',.
oPOVNaoNNd 000NONNar!
JD
A
Il
aou oYaoa .,rPn�i�r°.e.aIPSON�A$..oc. r°r.$w,ro v.P.�
y rrwppraYYauwo
VYwI. YOPaONPNNMPaOarmvP 9V . \VOp... rOPNfPNa
Tr lgi i4za<gzii Yv iCo y4�`... z.. 2..'. i_°> nns.i.esii2.^..`irs.`.o'D.°.rrr
r�T N° >YSVY YPSOO�wY ^D Syr >1rY ANNrMNr��
HODS �..nm
rmT�m�: T: �.> a .�goT�.:�<�. >r2 ::KS'"r���o�.'•N
+znv�9OO•^•rrrc sass yn=.SpB^yNNN y�s�y2ormsQ T�
yNY>TT SmN°.NiO <V{f2 OaN(1 D'r2if 211 •>wm > p LTnm
n.°.nvm ^>ePzpT>4r ST > P.-1 S ^� ^TN
n ^<iA
Mn NC < ^S ^� CCyr 1 =YrS� Nr O m
zln Y>n m •\ s o
• Ycvr rm ai'a x° � r
`ova m n T^ z
Z",
r- i rr�
s�T a
o N
o a i
n m
IP Y1>CO maw)NLrnw ^�DirC
.ONS>NSTTSG 24P0 1
>�n0•yyT� Y Aiw lY
NmDDrYOOmr�nrw I1
��OOnYUiO>NYrr
V NmV0. Nr 1.°n
>i > <n arrM�anvr i
w rNrrH.N•axr�P np rT $r� i
nNi ii J �Yd nD 1
S 00 1P >
> nPP mIV OpnYn
T dN TO ry 2
r r Q1 a i
r Nr N N r O
Yi Nna n >m ^Y - ni.
sGmrrirOD N 04PSm♦
€+o"ay °.P.NTTbio� oPPSnwfo
n N lommn r.. °o $a °im �c
m m si4ry M�T�rrz}gg c
a §Y non rT- �y P °> orl De
Ti o i.'\N my pia
D ^�PONTY 9r r }m N )Orr
S 0. .r0 rm r yP^
>r yDOTNinN '.y .r
pnC nN TYnn Cn Orr O�my
z z as pa rzr K -A N.Ni
D n D P
CP nn r r
r ua ^
N N SM 7T rr r
i w
y V
T 1
m
i
r
�OOf 000 = 0¢0000 VO 000Vp0000�0`VpU000u000�p00
dpypV..uN -O.pA YP }iVMrOdnYpN�vN-OdO.fip Y�uN -Oa
12. pmp. :•a.ine= ou$ir..- v >Nr.a
�+ �•°+° OU :.-'.oM�UOO °.°. ° °o$N.oiu °opo�o $aP�w °DU °o rrr.o orynoo :�
n
L n
O
p 'o
z >
a m
i P
fl
naa>
. MC
n22
�OOm
Mwa<yT -°In a..D •"ogal�:�V>N•II^r a nr°.In <n
° an.
°a Nxma.�laaaMi aw > a H.r.�ai
TZ m u2PZ
n N a> n P D A )1
y°gqmm T.D.r�NOTYm j
OZI>`wOrC�'yC AC
PM��O�00�^ONO IT
Nro yyNnD�> wew iw
iic io ✓amf.A °r '
N a�INmNPmzWrN iw
om.p a °Naorrrop �o In
•� IA
yO NfOaDAr�D A 1
a�A ✓e��oNn e° i
oMN:zrN
TCCTAP�ONY O
•S IS T.`.nw TNP d 1
i
aT2s✓ =s
I
imN a r 1 2
O
v°° I»•°+°. vu° u .°. °�,°. °ooa000w0000�o ^oou00000 osr000 ii> i
N N ,o 000�o�NOGrdaad `d �v ^`dmoyo�as `m `m 'r c
OOh .•P m�yu.OdPyp O.pmJPN> Odh PN.nVN ✓p
li
h00r �OUON >�r°NV001 w.IP 1��Vd ®JNO���PVUOP IS P
�00 I.V UGOYVU °OONp000vNmOONP4'.mjdO000NM�1 d..O rN
OV >OPOOONNrNOVO
12^
I�
tr
Y
• �
.f
f�
rN ✓ ✓ru
Ou00V0^p'F y�� ✓O00 JOdN=r0°VdNN rNOOdpdMd00°
✓vPVp
f
�
YP d..r NNyJO P ✓NONNNPNNdOMydfuvrr
WO! ✓OVJNMdO rPOPP10POMVWpd ✓rMd NI..IJ✓dpNNON
•H
T
�,
O >D0Z >nm..Om >T_ >TOO }OC
p 00 °ns1ZTDmCr�r =m >A<ys >S'
Im
d
r.
R�C.�N >�m OA''"'Px Oyl Z1i A Ong OH >NYSZyFlN3 ��'
• mNimm'^Nrww}.c�
1
»ylo>�IIM SOD D••1✓ ZO.{S S.tTO
>.. oNinmmme DN o znPC a ym H
np°✓
1
I
J��
°H >°rDpy AT }yOrmMyO S} S'I
•"in
>N� Z2 CC,,nO ZO
1
.-1
♦'r
✓MI•r
m0 CCw y_Tmy
SA�y2 NnrY n`UOOArm�_OmTCm y...l }roy
Li
Y0
SyNr nSyl.lB nOIDm�NO N fl OarF +1 OntDCT
11
1
^`A
N zDNS NNCeN a y »> zz }..Ha}1p>xrr
9°NS�> pN m. ..K> >Sy00DnPr2rNOY<Nr✓
T
gm
v-i. xnrrm
,r
in re e
�•
N
z�x° i m N S i c
i
N
li
D D N
�T =
T �
I
naa>
. MC
n22
�OOm
Mwa<yT -°In a..D •"ogal�:�V>N•II^r a nr°.In <n
° an.
°a Nxma.�laaaMi aw > a H.r.�ai
TZ m u2PZ
n N a> n P D A )1
y°gqmm T.D.r�NOTYm j
OZI>`wOrC�'yC AC
PM��O�00�^ONO IT
Nro yyNnD�> wew iw
iic io ✓amf.A °r '
N a�INmNPmzWrN iw
om.p a °Naorrrop �o In
•� IA
yO NfOaDAr�D A 1
a�A ✓e��oNn e° i
oMN:zrN
TCCTAP�ONY O
•S IS T.`.nw TNP d 1
i
aT2s✓ =s
I
imN a r 1 2
O
v°° I»•°+°. vu° u .°. °�,°. °ooa000w0000�o ^oou00000 osr000 ii> i
N N ,o 000�o�NOGrdaad `d �v ^`dmoyo�as `m `m 'r c
OOh .•P m�yu.OdPyp O.pmJPN> Odh PN.nVN ✓p
li
h00r �OUON >�r°NV001 w.IP 1��Vd ®JNO���PVUOP IS P
�00 I.V UGOYVU °OONp000vNmOONP4'.mjdO000NM�1 d..O rN
OV >OPOOONNrNOVO
12^
I�
l
r�
P
T
l
Pn °PiOUOJPOOdPdONO pC.P-N POdVOWYYWWVYWY
i
dOOdVdP OdJO JWOPPP+NrVO Oro- ,NNrrr r• -r.�rr 19
OrddJ+N OrYmr +.•.0+0000 NJPVd +••u°NaJJ -I ••JJ.1J I�
Im
sx no'Y.9 xpL20LF<es «JmrrroPN Nu.NJ Im
Ao «m� >• f�� >JmmmN « >wacAS «FO mrLJ�ooaoovvev ' °a
nnwo..9zy aaanNNy nzrWDO.. (� x>_>arccccc<ccc
}ZWr r• m �4 S1J2 Zr Y. STr03Tm NVJrrr r...l .•., -, �
•t.>..x a r s e�r.�mz saNs >xz:zsszzz N
br�e� m amn Aorar aNJmmmmmmmmm i
.•r ae LmLr zm"2r cNr.J.«.°- o >pl Aaaa9aaA 1 ..
°_OrT M,.-.^ /�° nr r• Z >°n3 2YZYF 1
ARM iOr m
o o. Ra•• 9irW�nn �nnnnn 1
OrrE L =P. .•>v
aao < «zr
o..yo smYn ^.°1 rr,�r eo -mz.o Nr ssN v2.......r........ . a
a «On No aaa f��i <ocoyooap000 v
S° 9,sn 'n ..u0i aYi T��.2...5•Z. n.ZiN �.A.. i .z..
i. n m nmmmmmmmm
y N N
�z 9 nooeaoaov
^ ozzzzzzzz
P z
_ - :scasassa
i
••onaraan naeanamnzn<Nnn.++.Nmvna<WJr. -Y rJ i
"u oCmC°9���••ni�i.�.i <C^,.m -ICn ri'.iiinic>.>•�oD...c^.mn..'z ja >a J i.i � +Omi i
iY °A`Nl3 ^�n2 92 T�••r �r20ar jCwmaA.OnTDGUmma IF
... >wra nmzmmn nnxi r unama r>n>r>'.
mn: o0 o.+am PrPmm «YPrYronNS o Yz�rP We ro..
n
rNnNnoP Nss T
mmO YI -Ni «J mn �.mnz W2i'm T.zne
sorer mm n9°a>r- 2mrcrm9 �1p
.. <y nY.>nTriy°yvy n
rA D1S nC
NT O Y^it. iM 21 N09TPrN yTfwi i9T >- C I
.miOD OOUa�J YTm_OS l�a.T OF d. Wl.,r (12 Anrnn .
>n rt°pr nr.. 1lS> n r2 +p O•C.nnnn 1'.nn
c vr-a ron or >r
r �•a wP r a �ti �> �• f S�+aanaaaaa � A
° wv°.°..°...°...°,.°„ o.« 000uowoonvu° u.° ...°...°..°N•.°N.W °vNmawNw «w.°, la 0
U.TP NN' N NN NN . NNNN A O
dnJPN+ W•. rOd '>rPNTrNrUdOJPN +VN�OdOJPN. +VNr 1• S
1 >
,L
N 9
do dN ian
°o. 000+PVNPO NNNY�NYO J.V.•r naWg�- - N.•n U- oe�✓ =ed
o ..WOamPmYniNON °o +sWN.. P +d Pa ++aePmNNfY
n ° oo° o: yo° nj.° aoo° mo- J.o °°.r•a•eo.°..«,°o.°a .P.. o.J. •P- .°+ami .N•= °mvo.°.
i
m
j)/
!`
■QE
=
J#� 9I�
� '
| �.
Wii!f
7
{�
unp. i
\
(��
�
/
&#w_a5�!
gpalas saeas$$ss�sass�ggEg :axggsiaiaaaga ;gzar,a
c33 3� =Y3-rrc R
3��3sa�?�2ia8s23a�ias''i�s "s eald�3tl l,i os33�3d�8i��a � s
aaaY:_s s sari+' ss zaYi $'s = :'s YassgYSagsai:YiaS�saZssa �^
DY�7 ��§ �€ 3II$ g? 9A�F3ikiD�Q $£d$��D3c�6�t §�I6,a' & roc
sas' sassasssi: is sssas' s' s'aess'as'a'si6s'si�eess'sa'asa ��a
8Y8YSE8YYS3CYiYYiH8Yi83F2S�iLi3i89YYCtYtg 4saa4za IF ya�
s aissai a's sas s's's iaaasa's as s's �'s's s'a ¢Ys:ae_'s as a'a sc p
IE
SaSaa'a'ass's'a s�asas4ssssaasa3assi @Y'sYC55i!'z Yas'xA ig
S EaSYEiSi38B3LEitEiiYaYBi &aEiLY58YEa:?^taa8293 1f.
- rrrrrrrr -r• -r rrrr r.•rrr. -rrr. �rrrrr•rr�rr IE?
�1 iSfi$ sse& �i�as' g��F�S3> r�C3dSgi3fii�S f =3Sllfa4's''nti4g& ^
rr.rr- •- •;•;.r• "rr;•.rrrr -r a;•r�.r•r.�r �;.r;•rrr•.•.• �•,
:-' SE$ Q' aa' �$> Q3i�7pE'$ g( �0s 'il9�ia9iEiII &$7_'{YEi}0anE41i6 f:
• rr- r�rr�r- r. rrrrrw - -�-
?S�E'i5n�n 8i➢ 9yc= F9r5$:85 =�x0�uo8>;ccHia?aac5ii; IE'
=3ry3�eE;EE?�3ga _2 �Se2'-'.E,sc 33ecn :E iEcrppa NppN _E e$-$�ee � �.
law a
>rsy_naYCCC�= dr£watc?gaY C..%5ae'e a3'c exce?e�c`e.e use
I*'
�I
an sa?ns§x$ ssgs$$$$ax ?s$sgsxg
WS 5Pc_s5Sr 28c:laa s:d r'=cgs_sS_
R1a es�_S �pa ?5�3��Faw RttY 66�a�3�su
Aim pQ -^
r- _r'_srs_sziig_c@a9saep3e3 �fE rf
e 22�lsickiia�e�i's�d3=iia �daH N
i]E8t2]Y3�GII1632xlaa]a3l's 311a3!
''assssssaisn'ssszsassisxaizs : sa:a
a lSdialllY��lIS3Q3S1 a2 alill3ll!
ss' s' sa' z zi'sausasss'a'ss'si'sxasa'sseas
a2sfss�saTMSSl's a]s3a2s32sasSlaa�
BD! $AA3$A3�AAAAAAA9�ajtD.i'p¢�p &A
8iIIiY8ii3sCiIIii8i82i t980iiEEeiti
��i7g35D $��r$S�$iiFaII�'Cv$��r5s'�6i$
$ C83C253A�Fs9 $g�i3ng9.`�i31F�u3skuifA
5EaAb3c?5 ?�E��'ad78�a. &.6�_1.�'n:
Sgz_ge7� - -sgs ggac9s- aefsa
93a §�33�i�3� §ia3a3 §���a�33��3 ?3
n30sty s`a_r ^nii_z7rit2sisc ^i._n5
B :'3inE_iihae I0� ,
C 6
I.^.RYR I7
g r
Igo
a
n
n
d�id�8sl2as
as gig aaelaa
A ?AMY#$1
29833sss'ss
lalailall8
t -At AA -At)AA
asaizszszz
a4sssassss
'igDY;E��i$3
i8i iliiis8
flAgif5��A81
Lil7'�6s'SA3$
s = eggc"?i9y
--y-3 -�
33Mffl3i
s scssl =EIeLa
of
P
�a
EI
3
�I
a�
as
se
U!
Qua
I
a�
0
$$6�, gg s� g YR zsss a$a$E £� ?ills 88ssasea qq �'
� caR 9 c_a e¢ �� � S?.�`a 9��inPuY$eo6a t•_8�32ai3sz8 5� ' ?1-
¢@�9��85��`F�FE
ir
s� Yasa s'o�dd s 25Fi .,5a3sd 3
F ?� � ct � � 3 NSY93lS22Y32aYSaY9 ?atEEa2 &Y ��
e i. 7 eY s $ u is iaY :s'seasssssa a's aisasas'ss �e�
$ II$ � $G $ $ 3 sszaaaiaa8aa:sassaaasisaa4s S ��eQS
::a a 's a ss's's's iissaais'a isiias's a'a's's'si c
_ A
i c3 i ri !' $ 3 ass'aaasaa4�+eaisg's asa'saa2a'sa ��
.. rn .a 's 's a sisia's s's's asssasssiiisssii'ss IG
z5 3� li a L'$" aro3 $Llu'n�igk8$Sti'P$ile�L3Eic1F's ��
idaiiT$i�63BftniLSdBS�nff$1211 igi
e cy �r r r- rrrr�r- rrrr- rrrrr - -. r �'
_ H gg H E d ESi�►cGtlgop95a3a4r54 @3oi$6i'a AEI
ia' �•i i 3�aa3���Y3�3i3B333���3a3i33 a s
.: c a. _ »s•incydas «E'1[yac3sEc= £es3.0 �ea
17
I
�i
v
5
s
Y
iii
a3]9 Kasai 3 HIM Ia d"
s[ L Lisa a s vs6bkss s ssiyis � ��°
'a jai s £e5r r 3 34 e'a3�'yyI II 'Mitt
L�S 8 J GnLY % t SSii%1% Z �=iY8! Af
a i ti s nns: s s ysnae�� s sabs'ss A
�' n £3�t P P£asscP 5!0£5at y2
�' r r rrrr r r rrr_rrr - --
8 5 A ScLt' i% $s.rfEOCB a 44n�� %I
y r r rrrr - r 'r rrrrr � rrrr '
Y 3 E y938 L 4 if5clft4 ! s3LYp8 F.i
- �93]L' HIM s
Iss M
9 _ L p 39d = L..snYS `o s aYSaEa sa
a.
- -� r-
,f
T $ �� I��
,, � EK Ian �
��� �
'� I
_, � a�
�F !r� �A �q
� � ��
��
a - gi
I� ���
e
i3
S I � �
3 I s� _
1�
f
G
M I n
Tool
l.wr.FY.GY.fp16 SATE MINrdim,
tl..nlv.IW Aw.Ir.ryGtlr
AN.F lwvlMlsfN.wc
Op IALS HER I win
tATIMO FLA"
•vrM1.�4r I.t. 2101I
vlw pww [u . C.
O
IWC[9. ho
,AN -'
l
COp1 t5-aT
Dow,
LUUW
L N4W(9) Of NIOCAMO)
_
Ws.l.w Ibe
/[TTA NOT 07 Sot pTS00, [T (F -19)
I. i 01M CO IIAt4SACpOitp1
IN
11C.
TM
x«
I
S43.00
41
A...1 F..
19].Cp
R ]
v..ya xvT
6709 C.n Iim A..
YIVIC4c 0C..91701 t.n S.Sn.MSne i
.TOlA4•
3 A9T.,Q0
W>W l A 69
I STATE Of XNOM PA [i:+r .l ._.....t �...n.. pyr.....1.�_.. _. —_
MT. M I ..,Iw, .y M.F ay yryy. W. ✓+Y. H nw 111 Y 4 Y �r w r Y r M r... r wl....A..
.Lw ♦ .wFw /w.w4 -_Y w FY. WYa .F rWJ V .Y. = Fw<.Ma r y ✓✓M1 �I M r_I Y M
.r...r n w.. a r+. +.wM i r i✓ r or�.4 .r+ r Yw 0 _ r ... r r r✓sr.
�w ✓ Yr w w rr r.. rte. r r/..al A�w r wJ.wt ..r h dr4 I. +u .. •wr4. s .rn
♦w.la ../wr ✓w +. .alwF ✓N�`.Y Y. M.�V 4Yw r�+w.Iti✓ w�..Y
w r.4 .W. wIrn4W Mra- .�w� ^Yw .✓.rwV w': r M
r w� r wwr M rwY1. �Y 4w r a_Iw rMw... • w++ Y .r/�r w Y ...r.. �.Mr w
.y AIFI W
® APPUCATTON BY TRANSTIROR
I STATE Of GYIIObiA
rr, �� ✓ �� � ✓r y.wY. �I � r..w �.✓ +.a nl w 1 Y tiw I r ..rY .W w r .✓rw I.r
wW F Y Y.aNq Y✓.r �1 M' w.Mwt .1 �.. N .... w r.YY .. w M.B 1b ww r r.F tiwr�
ywr✓ w Y .�V YwFtl � .1✓. +�rl w aaMw Y Y Mlw P41 4.�r MF.. r Y �r ✓ FFMww.
r aw./.. 4 �✓r• Y pr.� A r Y .r✓w .✓ar.' r tir . .. 4 ✓ �'. ^'Vn r Fa.w .I . IW V F 1✓1Y
wY ✓ IYrr � rnMw. 4YnI w r'�� ^ -•M ✓ aw.law lu .a.✓/ MMwn W
b Nef Wm, 11,1" TA4 Uv1 FN D,10w Vw OwII
C Iwo
Y
o ..
F A
N
6
A
}
q
9 �
1 � z
H161
L619 560 M9
e
P A
N d
n
0
16L9
za
m�
F
n
Y
T
J
b
N
V Y
'O z
c
N
V
V
J
ATN){A11W "'r p1T/MN1C drTMAM LM MS)
fr ONrI"'I J AWl hl C.."
ITGI •..4.7
f.rr.wl Cd1 T]Iit -iY �aoT whr
1{. o.i.a3u/L,NIwWIr
1. TT1N3) IN III
nli MQ
d MIJ W1 { tGt 702
rXIc "TIM tN0
IAE.Ir Ik Td{{ p
be..D ..
MC/mT��
CON 3435
Orr
i / U9M 04 AH11UM1A
rr Nrll
MMnO.In
Iii. Tlu
vYC.o. rr
2 TfrlD] OF WSLACTC*0
RI
IG
rrK
s
a Ir.. r tern+
y , - -- W 3..r
III AAC kl AT{A
--
-a /wZy w. C.r+1
io1A1
4
t MN.nM1n YU..1J. 1. An nrr.NW
CM
t Y,i.4 A461.M Hllw.l kv.3)- A,..lw w r./ �
11 {yl✓..'1T3'rr.rMM.Tr 10rr.w.drw+.� {H.4 {+4""a r^rr"M�r`
12 1{I Mrr M -0 Iw.aJwe� r M.'rwl a+ J", d M •1x1+4 M.+Na GwJ tarty. w
12 {TAI! d CAIVOWA Cr.+T r µ-11 .{p}1PS:17 Owr1%t%AE --
W ..�.. / ..M". r/ ..� .'nr. �. V•. r..w w. w..i ill r . w WA w .r / h r/rr .r r r �.
.Inw J w/Yw. wnM.. r... Y \+..M �....� .11 •YJ w r.. Y ww.�w w Y V/n N .w �.
� ...r.r .w w.wr..r • wn.J ....F a t rw, w � .w.w J . I.r .. w W r ..rr. r.n .r �. Y..rF �r
Il AMUCAM /i._ w /. �•
YOM Will
M--
APPLICATION DY TS MWUOa
11 3'4tl W CAWOaAA C&I
D. NN WAr Mbr TAY W, Tr D- I+Id Ur CN4 � )
0 11 PI Com
A.tHJ p uWM..an.
V
Iwo`
1
Iy
YA
.r
1
DRANGON EXPRESS
9028 Archibald Ave.
"
Rancho Cucauwnga,Ca 91730
?j
APN/ 209 - 171 -41
r.
er
P
Pre erty Currently Zoned:
General Industrial Sub -area IV ISP
Zoning of Ad Property,
North: Gene trial Sub -area
III
1
ISP
South- Genera. austrial Sub -area
IV
N
ISP / Low - Residential
East : General Industrial Sub -area
IV
DRAGON EXPRESS
(Vacant) ISP
West : General Industrial Sub -area
III
9028 Archibald Ave
ISP
a
_m
s
U
C
_
6
�3
Joe torrer
i SEVENTH STRUJ
.,
19 Jan. 1989
JAN 18 MS
■
momwo i mm,Mmw on"m uauaa)
TY CyYYO \1 iM��'.;
s�v.o.. cre Mw� � °Laet�+�^ —^- .
>L.r1✓.'ar•i 4.1T w+hA*
Lrr ILOaR /YM wR
1. TTM a UCDG"
� �e Pear 6 Ytn•
Uf MA=
I
AIdN RJR 7u. 1104 ❑
!RM 0.e
ms Iva
� � u
11�
w
1.\R/
L NAMRW OF Awi1CAUM
RT 1YiY
M«YY Dw.
nt
es Ce J
L RTM) OF TLN4\GWWS)
m
11C
nTa
v o •
uwaoo
A3
u
aTO • r
t Maw M A.Nr
•Inn.IR C
0241 rooWlI 81TA..
oY W tbC ... SmE'""y
TOTAL
3
9..ITa. dOn.w .l.�tTI1GY ON IIRRT We
a Aray Adla w Yws+ti A -N+e`. «d fR.., n.w �wr
Ho
17. STAT9 O/ _
_ ra•C»DRf161e1C0 a/ -_ '�"Y —��
11�
Y
APFUCATIOw BY MMSPROl
1L SFAT[ OF C� C+ d a•iLx.R.,.M Im Oe`..]..L}.6.9. —__
N/r.....s _Y. � \./�... Yu.1. M_ _. F► I r4. Fr .M_ F w. r
I LRaaY 1.\JwRr 4W OfYMOa Csdr Cr
1). NOW,*D.do«77 IA., ra Ory'« Ow 04 .-I ,I
Aemea ❑ L« «dR1 Yaw. !TJ\4
❑One+r.T\ _Cans 11A•m __! �� O,l
VINCM SPAGHETTI HOUSE, INC.
8241 Foothill Blvd.
Rancho Cucamonga, Ca.
APR# 207- 113 -25
Property Currently Zoned;
Conmercial,Sub -area One Foothill Blvd Spe0 flc
Plan
Zoning of Adjacent Property;
North; Commerical, Low Residential
South; Commerical, Medium Residential
East ; Commerical, Medium Residential
Hest ; Commerical, Office
North
I
\ fgor�4
•,
/ (J /
Ya >
8241 Foothill Blvd.
46 \ yam• \
� p1
Q .,
bz
63 to
\\
Q, as sa 113
Il
33
15 13 10
36
O
.i
SAN FlFRNARniNo
,
joc torrez
19 Jan 1989
Jaw(• l wxllnwn
1w01[w Y apt[YwSFi
paarx a xanSON
( [naor ooiowan
o (puo roF
w•prxa on e[[p n.n neon
AS�iwP1, �a �,�
P.
rif4�16M1 ..i�G�wM�(lj(���b.�!/e(QNtYY Y ti4�! /Il16fY W q(1. �1('\ ���•` �^
✓ "r'^^o UT ^lYx1�VY• NUx N[M ONC civic CLMI,(N C,t q"
• 0 5o 1059
epu uu,op nla eases -10[9 _I p h
n•I v90 0•01. un •ei ae.1 � �,
IKt� •M1%
January 9, 1989
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga City council
9120 Baseline
Post Office Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, Califor.aia 91770 -0807
Dear honorable Council Members:
By this correspondence I wish to advise you that a now
partner has recently joined our firm, P. Elliot Goldman. Mr.
Goldman has been in private practice prior to joining the firm,
and as part of his practice has engaged in criminal defense.
He currently has criminal defense matters pending in the County
of San Bernardino, and anticipates being requested and retained
to handle various criminal matters in San Bernardino County In
the future.
In accord with the provisions of Government Code Section
41805 it is permissible for Mr. Goldman to continue to handle
criminal matters provieed that the City expressly rolieves him
of any and all prosecutorial responsibilities on its behalf.
By way of this correspondence I wish to advise you of the
activities of Mr. Goldman, and request your consent to allowing
him to handle criminal defense matters in the County of San
Bernardino. All that is necessary for your consent is that you
expressly relieve F. Elliot Goldman of any and all
prosecutorial responsibilities on behalf of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga Should the City of Rancho Cucamonga at any point
in the future require prosecutorial action by our firm, it will
be handled by firm members other than Mr. Goldman, thereby
avoiding any conflict of interest.
In addition, in deference to the City, although Mr.
Goldman will hatiale criminal matters in San Bernardino County
if you. consent -a granted, he will, of course, decline to
handle any criminal matter that arises within the city limits
of Rancho Cucamonga.
We would greatly appreciate your taking the necessary
action to authorize Mr Goldman's continuing acceptance of
G
J�
Yi
.5
} city of Rancho Cucamonga
January 9, 1989
Page Two
criminal defense matters in the County of San Bernardino and
' expressly relieving Mr. Goldman of any and all prosecutorial
responsibilities on the City of Rancho Cucamonga's behalf.
Thanking you in advance for your anticipated prompt and
courteous attention to the instant request.
wl
t,r Very truly yours,
JLYt alf
HARMAN
C \131 \I.CITYCOU
iJ
i
.M'
V.
i
a7
-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM WGA
STAFF REPORT
DATFt February 1, 1989
TO: City Council and Acting City Manager
PROM: Russell H. Maguire, -11ty Engineer
BY: Dave Blevins, Maintenance Superintendent
SUBJECft Re"hedu!ing of Red Hill /Heritage Park
Piold Renovations
Vim.
Council is already avers that Staff is proceeding with on going
project a and programs approved to correct problems at Red Hill
and Heritage Parks. Fiscal year 1988 -89 includes a project t
renovate the athletic fields at Heritage Park as part of the
multi -year program.
In discussing the scheduling of the project, Engineering and
Community Services discovered that the "window" of time needed to
complete the work successfully (late Spring early Summer) would
conflict with Little League Season. With minimum advance notice
available to the affected user groups, it was felt that the
result would be disastrous for their program.
Therefore, it is in the Staff's opinion that Heritage Park should
be scheduled for next year and tha order be reversed so that
portions of Red Hill Park be done this year in the overall
reconstruction program. We teel that this rescheduling would
result in the least amount of impact on sports programs and allow
the city to work with the affected ynuth sports groups on
scheduling for next year's 2nd phase so that ae much public
education can be established prior to that work beginning.
Respect 1 ted,
RHM i'tfB: la �
e
OW
wi
r
-- - -- C[T OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: Februery 1, 1989
TO: Jerry 3. Fulweod, Directrr of Resource Services 4t
FROM: Bounle Cabrinha, Assessment Revenue Analyst
SUBJECT: AEZrov,.1 to increase the Fee for Phase I to a not -
7.O -0-cre amount o $ Ito tt__ —a; to Fie �man1
�RRol��a�� and Aas atee for the ro oae community
Facli t es 0 atr a Et wan a 11 1 an - ) from
un__ s_.rpos to with e City yb Rio ran
umpauy
RECOKMENDATIONr
Staff renommendo that City Council approve the increase of
Fee for Phase I from $3,504 to a not -to- exceed amount of
$7,500 to be paid to Fieldman, Rolapp c Associates for the
propoead Community kacilities District, Eciwanda Highland
(88 -1) from funds deposited with the City by the Caryn
Company.
BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS:
An increase of Fee for Phase I has been r.ecessita
additional wcrk requested .nd the complexity of r
planning.
Re
r✓• iawV'arrJ�G
Jerry B. Fulwood
Cirector of Resource Services
JBF /kmo
Attachment: Ccpy of Addendum to the Letter Agreei
aq
I
J� neldman, Rapp newt ca,. Associates wuwn J. y5eu a.a
R NkluN t(eNUlun
Lprwwa.lb4pp
tY4rtlpab
December 9, 1988
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Post Office Box 307
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Attention: Me Jerry D. Fulwood, Assessment Revenue Coordinator
Re: Addendum to Letter Agreement dated 12/03187
Dear Mr 7ulwood:
The above referenced Letter Agreement, doled December 3, 1987, specified o Fee for
Phase I not to exceed $3,750. 'In • Addendum hereby proposes a fee Increase for Phase I
to a not-to-exceed amount of $7,50u to be paid to Fieidman, Rolapp R Aasociales. A copy
of she Letter Agreement Is enclosed.
This increase has been =nsitated by the additional work requested and complexity of
required planning.
If this Addendum is satisfactory to you, please take appropriate action to authorize its
acceptance by signing and returning the duplicate copy.
Sincerely,
FIF,LDMAN, ROLAPP R ASSOCIATES
L �ry olap
President
Addendum, FRA Project No. 1224
APPROVI U
� h N ilorlo, Presldcl
9 he Coryu Leve:opmenl Company
2";E MAIN 51REE1
54COND FLOUR
IRVINE. U 91714
(7141 Nn Sea
rr,x pl /117i•t7J
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Me Jerry B. Fulwood
Assessment Revenue Coordinator
91
The Ca;,u n COmpany
AmlO17keBw 216. & 14o CA 7677 -0716
011kt (1-14; 499 -5929 41(1 14) 495-3/73
January 9, 1989
Ais. Bonme cabrlrSn
Assessment Revenue Analyst
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P. O. Bu;. 807
Rancko Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: Addendum b the Letter Agreement for
Fleldman, Rolopp & Associates (87 -207)
Dear Bonnle:
Pursuant to You, letter of Jngeory S, enclosed please find Air. Dilorlo9 approval
of tha referenced Addendum.
/Is
Enclosure
cc: Air. Chris F Pouts
Yours trulv,
Judy Spiczka
Secretary
3i
�- i_I• - ._�E -i =E -i i- iii- i_i_�i � i -_�_�- i_�i__ ►_i_i i r
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mrar s,.en, a.n<n,twm�,y.ouemrn :o, plo sw�lnl
January 5, 1909
Joseph N. Dilorio
The Caryn Company
P.O. Box 216
South Laguna, CA 92677 -0216
SUBJECT; Addendum to the Letter Agreement for Fieldman,
RO app L A980C ate'J
Dear Joe:
Enclosed for your approval is a copy of the Addendum to the
Letter Agreement for the amount of $7,500 to be paid to
Fieldman, Rolapp L Assoclatec.
Upon your approval of the Addendum to the Letter Agreement,
we will take it to City Council to amend the service
agreement dated December 3, 1987.
If you should have any questions, please contact me at
extension 216.
�Cordially,
Bonnie Cabrinha
Assessment Revenue Analyst
BC /ko
CC: Jerry B. Fulwood, Director of Resource Services
Attachment: Addendum to the Letter Agreement
32
r....��.�..
♦o,., Wleb mh AlB..nr Clamela Boyvrr 11 [uy iu.wp.
penme L $IOYr DeOOrth N Brown Pamela) wn, {M laortn M W,uerrun
■
r
i
1
'�*3 C77Y OF ItANC"O CUCAMONGA
?ECc I 'Irp
nEr,29 i98I
aw Oak m mr, was C—u C`U✓ 911N,. my vn.uv
December 17, 1987 A C-rjVE
�Na=J
Larry Rolapp
Fie,dstan, Rolapp and Associates
2100 S E Main Straot
Irvine, CA 92711
Dear Larry,
On December 2, 198." City CO "ncil approved the Reimbursement
and Consulting Agreements for the Proposed Caryn Community
FAcilit.os District (88 -1) Enclosed for ynur information is
Your sigled contract 87 -207
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to
call me at 17111 980 -1851 extension 212
4S nc 'rls /l/y,
-1'r-12yrce Cente: Coordinator
JEF:sgr
Enclosure
33
.� ._m CT✓f..l ngoe l' Iemy Vr? - ✓
l.a. +/ wuunu
Ins•
eo8� �
SEBVISls
We agree to provide financial Consultant services in connection with any and all of
the City's financing requirements as they Pert.tin to the Project.
I. Prelim.
We will confer with Staff, Bond Ceuns:! and Consulting Engineers for
the purpose of making a preliminary survey of the Project and to assist
in the formulation of a eoard:nated plan 'o finance the Project.
H. AttsitilIncr At Public hfysines /Work h
— t
We will attend say meetings concerning
decu the Project when deemed
sary aaq ' a addition, be available to meet with the aCfeetcd
Property owner(,) to explain the effects of any propose.! financing.
Ilf. Can ;ult ti /Ad
We will be available for cons'iltation and advice until such time as the
Bonds issued [o (:mince the Prose t have been sold.
IV u'erk Settl_ o —y�qu,
We will be available to enuduet and/or participate is work sessions and
seminars which ,nay be held to discuss the Project a'td methods of
Public financing,
V Pnblle H =d pL
We will attend all public hearings and shall participate in such hearing,
to the extent deemed nciesta•y,
Y.' L_SI.i,
�' Fill perform the following additional services +n :nojunction with the
ma r�,•nr.g Of Bonds.
Ustitlilp3L @2nd ai i t
eurn..h the City wins information ccncermng current municipal Bond
0' the va AaaclOg and maxi rccommendanons as to the techn¢al details
o` the itaaamog. meludin8 maturity ,chedules, toad;, edvenant:,
eGmpgon features and Other details which will, io our s. covenant:.
make
= Lrepaacd fmannng most acceptable to pr Ill. iD c purchaser and, e
narafore. marketable at th• lowesi possible intent •ate
I. ♦. -e. at A cal / t11i•c
Sale
At + c dir -too of the Crti eight. negotiate r sal: of the eantcmplaged
8o::es 4i ass+. she Pp 10 calling for competitive bids.
A. Jut>mrl r•d c I
If it is determined to sell the Ponds by 1111miatcd sale, we will:
1 fielecli_ o r �..
a itualifrcd un Icraw�ritsL¢hosn reputation, fiaaatialcstrength
:"Iand experience will but serve the interests of the City and
cctcd property owner(s).
2 Con - ULI ilyn /ad•Itg, Attend
City when deemed , Attend -cry meetings concerning the
for consultatmn and Y and, in addition, be as•alla Dle
!snaace the Im rove advi.' until such time as the Bonds to
4 menu .or the City have bece sold.
3. Ntenrlar d —S ' L- Assist the City in negotiating the
sale of the eoatemplated Bonds to the undera
Pursuant to sub•paregitph A.1, above, titer selected
recommendations to the City. and make appropriate
4. jl I p i w
of all Cats r— ?o�he marketing orf the proposed aspects
Bawds taelud ;ng way Underwriter Disclosure Documeat. posed
". Due DIII¢e ce A If a due will Participate in suci due diligence meeting you
in the examination of pertineat financial data.
5. Bonds 'elwgarurllr p..l•..
Bonds are sold is more than one ,let will av,Cw the
financial terms and conditions of each off:ria review the
io what extent, if anY* the xeuriq of each •rr cs of Bonds ris
?0 what
� Afulrl 1 Ce t. rc
— t+- .+�..�,... ie t ht P Id d
al thorned Bonds arcane sold i° More than o c event
we tw 11 the
provide scrv)cs for each series of Ponds it accotdaace with
sub Paragraphs A.I. A.2, A.2, 1..4 and A."
Seals till
If It c detecmmed to sell the Bonds at sale" competitive bid, tec
wsl' Perform the following services:
1 Disclos Dnsyment Accumulate and
Disclosure Document economic, fmsacial, and sn�htialtdata
A
Document to the Proposed financing, which Disclosure
Document wdl the
eathef official to you of Sale. Disclosure
Dist DI'I
dntributi ' pls Disclosure Prior
theshc rod e'rn and
hold a due diligence meeting to verify the a City
Y agrees to
data stirs nod in the Disclosure Document and maker full
duclosnrc of III pertinent information eonceraing the
2
economy and finances of the City, ue will Participate in
of Pertinent due diligence meerng and assist you in the eaammation
or financial dzia.
3• ZLitlettlon of DHc• D
of the City, Cause to Prod Under the supervision
n+---'L�� P said Disclosure DOCUnienL
d• t 12111111 tlI f D' i s D
the Duelpsure D Distribute copies of
municipal securities, current ip known Under writers or
3• .It [ all n.
authonzetl Lnaoc! —�p�'y In the event the
update and 6 +s SOIp is more than one sale, we will
Document in accordaooc w�h copies the raevised Disclosure
and BA. above, 3., B.3.
5. [ens If t� Ire. Attend
Proseet when deemed neecssar any meetings concerning bavil the
for consultation and advice until such tame[ addition be available
finance the Project have been sold. the Bonds to
7• C2Rfa
selee[ Dumber of Untlerwritecs MakC direct contact with a
bidding on the Bonds."
onds. efCan m stimulate
& ILIE ROVD RIIV R ad
BOND BUY�•n Phe Offering Or risthe B d THE
Prior to the time bids are received for such :� „e Bond issue
9.
errand --
which e�—` l—s;• Attend meetings of the City at
bids for Bonds ■re received for the purpose of
assisting in the computation Ind evaluation of such Dads.
III. Bond R tl
If deemed desirable, work with rctogo .d rating scrvice(s) in an
attempt to obtain an advantageous raiz ting of the Bonds is De issued.
IV I "sue
If deemed desirable, we will assist the City in obtaining an insurance
policy P+ov+ding for guaranrecd Payment
the Bonds. of Principal and interest cn
V 'EIC"dance Bond CIpIlor,
will compute Closing fi
In the coordination of f gures, inCludmg accrued interest, ae d assist
m eve0 is of the closing
Successful sale is
fmg, adeenihate. signed bysthe appropriate
the the City offm+als of the Gry. acting .n their official capamry•, to the effect that
to the best of their know Pfect that
knowledge and belief, and after reasonable
3 3(,
investigation, a) neither the Disclosure Document nor anv amendment
Of supplement thereto contains ..ny untrue statement of a mamend fact
or C'nen to erase any material fact necessary in order to make the
mare. n is therein, g; light si of the circumstances in which they were
made, not misleading; b) since the date of the Diselocure Document, no
event has occurred which should have been set forth in such an
amendment or supplement; nor e) has there been any material adverse
change in the operation or financial affairs of the City since the date
or such D ;.elnsnre Document
VI. Table or
After the Bonds have been delivered,
City a Table of Deb Service which will we will Prepare and furnish the
set forth a
Payments of ual semiannual and
annual Pay principal and interest due on t cthe Bonds,
FHA_, S EI�I
�cednre A' I
After the Bonds have been delivered we will prepare and furnish the
City with a Procedure Manual to be used to assist in the administration
Of the District and the servicing of the Bonds. The preparation of this
Manual shall be coordinated with star( and affected departments.
We will be available for consultation and advice to the City to assist City Starr in
the administration of the District and the servicing or Ill. Bonds.
EUS
Fee: for services rendered under Phase I will be billed at our • tandard hourly rates
maximum fee toe bet Paid under rPhase I shallonott videexd; . Provided. 53, 30 hiS wevehcdule 'A'
attached hereto, for schedule of current hourly rates.)
Fnr all services to be rendered under Phase 11 resulting in the tale of Dor.Cz
h r:cund:r the City will pay us S12,300 for rach ..rtes of Bonds.
Fees for services rendered under Phase Ill will be billed at our standard hoarly
rare$ a effect If the time such servscrs are Provided
ABAND_ ON \IEi�T
In the event the Pro$rct is abandoned after Phase 1 bur poor to the completion of
rendered the Phase agree. to pay us a fee et.ual to the reasonable value or services
be er Phase II ��• to exceed 53,000. Reasonable value for our services shall
be dercrnvncd by using our current hourly rates in effect ¢t the time of such
abandonment. plus ranbursement for usual and customary cu4' She
cOfesuch
Attacned hereto is Schedule 'A' of our hourly rates in eC(rt as of the date of this
Agreeacnt
rxEC sea 3 7
't
3
The City will reimburse us for
-• including, but not limited to, and tustomar
-- the Di thr cat of Y out -of- packet ezpen.cs,
Disclosure Document, eo•• financial producing and distributing or updating
i n nection runt with navel outride of Souther Cai fornia13 if such travel incurred in
to the furtherance o! the Project and is authors ted b g and costs incurred in
y City.
Fees bawd on hourly rate Shall be duesable monthly,
Payment for all services rendered and ezpenru incurred this Project. band shad be paid at the eloling' 1a the event of abandonment or the
Project, abandonment feu shall pursuant to Phase 11 or
abandonment, be due and payable immediately after such
Ralc
This Agreement snail remain sa full force and
cos., Occurs. herein has been completed or the Project Is abandoned, whichever
It is expressly understood that this Agrcentnnt does not intend to and is not under
I
ny circumstances to be coals t as requiring us to
capacity t only practice of taw; we are employed in aPerform exerrt fiaaneial advisory
aich
3S
rr: � •
3
u
114
7,
r
if the foregoing Agreement is satisfactory to ,vou• please take appropriate action to
authorize its acceptance by signing and returning the duplicate copy hereof
Respectfully submitted,
FIELDMAN, ROLAPP S ASSOCIATES
Lawrence G. Rolapp
LGR /tg
Attachment
Exec [A on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga thi da of
1987. y
By:
Titl
Datt
ATTEST:
BY-
T . /
itle: tA�
Date / 7%
6
?A
i
'r
SCHEDULE •A•
e
P11Lrinels -s ��
('ansolt $125.00 Per Hour
Seeret_� tee // $65.00 per Hour
• O
545.00 per Hour
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE February 1, 1989
TO: City Council and Acting City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Willie yalbuena, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securit, and
Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 2 for
Tract 12895, located on the wrest side of Baker Avenue, south of
Foothill Boulevard, submitted by Chung Eh Mao and Suan Suan Mao
and Rancho Citiland Development California Limit Partnership
RECONETa1TIOM
It 1s recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions
approving Tract 12895, accepting the subject agreement and security, ordering
the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District Nos. I and 2, and authorizing the Mayor and the City
Clerk to sign said agreement and to cause said map to record.
ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND
Tract 12895, located on the west side of Baker Avenue, south of Foothill
Boulevard, in the Medium Residential Development District, was approved by the
Planning Commission on January 27, 1988, for the division of 9.03 acres into 4
lots.
The Developer, Chung Eh Mao and Suan Suan Mao and Rancho Citiland Development
California Limit Partnership, is submitting an agreement and security to
guarantee the construction of the off -site improvements In the following
amounts:
Irrevocable Letter of Credit- Faithful Performance: $430,000.00
Irrevocable Letter of Credit -Labor and Material: $215,000.00
Monumentation: S 2,600.00
Copies of the agreement and security are available to the City Clerk's Office.
Letters of approval have been received from the high school and elementary
school districts and Cucamonga County Water District. C.C. L R.'s have also
been approved by the City Attorney. The Consent and Waiver w Annexation form
signed by the Developer is on file to the City Clerk's ofrice.
Respe y s fitted,
Attachments
c,
3�
RESOLUTION NO. 97- 0.3 /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12895
WHEREAS, the Tentative Map of Tract No. 12895, consisting of 4 lots
submitted by Chung Eh Mao and Suan Suan Mao and Rancho Citiland Development
California Limit Partnership,•Subdlvider, located on the west side of Baker
Avenue, south of Foothill Boulevard, has been submitted to the City of Rancho
Cucamonga by said Subdivider for approval by said City as provided in the
Subdivision Map Act of the State of California, and in compliance with the
requirements of Ordinance No. 28 of said City; and
WHEREAS, to meet the requirements established as prerequisite to
approval of the Final Map of said Tract said Subdivider has efftred the
Improvement Agreement submitted herewith for approval and execution by said
City, together with good and sufficient Improvement Security, and submits for
approval said Final Map offering for dedication for street ano highway
purposes the streets delireated thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
1. That said Improvement Agreement be and the same is
approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same
on behalf of said C44.y and the City Clerk is
authorized to attest t•iereto; and
2. That said Improvement Security is accepted as good
and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and
content thereof by the City Attorney; and
3. That the offers for dedication and the Final Nap
delineating same be approved and the City Clerk is
authorized to execute the certificate thereon on
behalf of said City.
�2
+i
RESOLUTION NO. Vq — OV6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE AN's1EXATION OF
CEP.TAiN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT MOS. 1
AND 2 FOR TRACT 12895
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to
the terms of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1912', being Division 15,
Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, said
special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1, Street Lighting Maintenance Dl strict No. 1 and Street Lighting
Maintenance District He. 2 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Maintenance
District'); and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the
'Landscaping aM Lighting Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of a...iitionai
territory Lr the Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, at this time the City Council i; desirous to take
proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and
WHERFAS, all of the o.,ners of property within the territory proposed
to be annexed to the MaintenAnce District have filed with the City Clerk their
written consent to the proposed annexation without notice and hearing or
filing of an Engineer' port%
Hold, THEREF% rHE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA
HEREBY P.C.VILYES AS FOL.. is
SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2: That this legislative body hereby orders the annexation
of the proper As shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work progrw areas as
described in Exhibit '8' attached heroto to the Maintenance District.
SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District,
including a evy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory
annexed hereunder.
45
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 2
G45FLmL
'DRWE
CIWCjKO Cotigr,
Mop,us COUZT
Ficus CouRr
ACecc COU2T
ml
CITY OF U NMO CUCAMONGA
-�c COUNTY OF BAN DSRNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
V.
N
Coutcti-
[nup -7-
I
i
e�
5:
EXHIBIT `B'
PROJECT NAME: TRACT 12895
NO. OF D.U. OR ACREA9E: 4 LOTS No. OF ASSESS. UNIT: 8 UNITS
STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
No. of to be Annexed
L s
District do. ,_ 7T71M
1 ___ --- -" --- "'
2 1 ___ ___
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
District No. Street Name
1 BARER AVENUE
Turf Ground Cover Trees
Sq. ft. Sq. ft. Ea.
0 0 13
1415
■
CPCP OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
BATE: February 1, 1989
TO: City Council and Acting City Manager
FROM Russell H. Maguire, City Enginaer
BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works InspectgG�
SUBJECT: imp+rovaements locatedmonithg eassttnside of Haven Avenue between
Church Street and Base Line Road, submitted by Lewis Hones
RECCMEIDATIOM
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution,
accepting subject
k to agreement d extension and security and authorizing the
Mayor
ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction.
of the public improvements for the east side of Haven Avenua between Church
Street eeber 17 1 Base in Line the following 9 e approved by the Citf Council mi
Faithful Performance Bond: $144,500.00
Labor and Material Bond: $ 72,250.00
The said improvement aqireement, is
Copies of the Improvement AgreennthExtension1 are
available in the City Clark's Office.
0
Hr. Steve Gillilard
community Devalopmint Department
Engineering Division
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamoaga, CA 91770
Re: Improvement Agreeme-t Extension - Haven Avenue
Dear H'c. Gilliland:
En.lcsed, in response to your letter of December 27th, is our
check for the required $251.00 tee, together with three executed
extension applications.
In addition to extending a storm drain line, which will be
completed soon, we also need to add right turn lams at the
entrances to both Tract 11662 and 17664, per their conditions of
approval. Both tracts are still being designed and neither has
yet been submitted for plan check. We think that Tract 13664,
thn later of the two, will be through the process in time for us
to have the remaining Haven Avenue improvements completed within
a year, and so are requesting a twelve month extension.
Please call me at (714) 949 -6688 if you have questions or need
further information
V-ry truly yours,
I.E(WWlSS HOMES HAH(6GEH�EI�T. CORP
Donald H Thompson
DHT:sd
Enclosures
41
RECEIVED
` Lewis Homes Management Corp.
JAN 18j989
1156 NaM MomWn A+moe I P.O. Boa 6701 Upland, C&Mrnla 91795
i 7IU9614M
L417 of RAfloo WCAaON CA
71"M09% FAX:
ENCIMIIRINC OSYHIOR
a
?, January 12, 1980
Hr. Steve Gillilard
community Devalopmint Department
Engineering Division
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamoaga, CA 91770
Re: Improvement Agreeme-t Extension - Haven Avenue
Dear H'c. Gilliland:
En.lcsed, in response to your letter of December 27th, is our
check for the required $251.00 tee, together with three executed
extension applications.
In addition to extending a storm drain line, which will be
completed soon, we also need to add right turn lams at the
entrances to both Tract 11662 and 17664, per their conditions of
approval. Both tracts are still being designed and neither has
yet been submitted for plan check. We think that Tract 13664,
thn later of the two, will be through the process in time for us
to have the remaining Haven Avenue improvements completed within
a year, and so are requesting a twelve month extension.
Please call me at (714) 949 -6688 if you have questions or need
further information
V-ry truly yours,
I.E(WWlSS HOMES HAH(6GEH�EI�T. CORP
Donald H Thompson
DHT:sd
Enclosures
41
- :M:; -
RESOLUTION NO. ' Dql
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAKMk, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROMENT SECURITY FOR
ASREEmEmT AND STREET IMPROVEMESNIS LOCATED R ON THE SIDE OF THE
HAVENM AVENUE BETWEEN CHURCH STREET AND
BASE LINE ROAD
WHEREAS, the City Council o1 the C1ty of Rancho Cucamonga,
California, has for its conalderation an Improvement Agreement Extension
exec,ted on February 1, 1929, by Lewis Homes as developer, for the improvement
of public right -of -way adjacent to the real property specifically described
therein, and generally located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Church
street and Base Line Road; and
WHEREAS, the Installation of such improvements, described in said
Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in
eastusideoofwHaverr,Avenue beettween Church Strreetiannd easenLineoR da and e
WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and
accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified
in said Improvement Agreement Extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said
Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is
hereby authorized to sign said iprovement Agreement Extension on behalf of
the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto.
5
s
y
f
CITY OF %ANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1989
TO: City Council and Acting City Manager
FROM: Russell ft. Maguire, City Engineer
81: Willie Yalbuena, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of a Sutordination Agreement for Lot 19 of
Tract 7176, located at 8406 Orchard Street, submitted by
Roland L. and Carolyn A. Taylor
RECf 40=TIOW:
It is recaamenJed that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving safd Subordination Agreement and Authorfzfng the Mayor and City
Clerk to sign same.
BACKGRCUND /AJULYSIS
A lien agreement was approved by City Council on May 7, 1981, for the
construction of a sidewalk at 8406 Orchard Street.
In order to secure financing for their projtct, the lender r quires that
the Lien Agreement be subordinated to liens in favor of the lender.
Roland L. and Carolyn A. Taylor have submitted the attached Subordination
Agr ement for Cfty Council Approval.
tespec submitted,
R101•wY:ly
Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. D i ,D V a-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CUlNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO APPROVING �R N DNL SAND CAROL M AA TAYLOR A
ND TAUTHORIZINNG THEE MAYOR
MD CITY CLERK TG SIGN SAME
WHEREAS, a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for
the ins of sidewalk along Orchard Street was approved by City Council
a, on May 7, 1981, and recorded in San Bernardino County on Nay 12, 1981
ra Instrument No. 81- 104021; and
A WHEREAS, for the developer to secure financing for the project, the
lender requires that the above - mentioned lien be subordinate to the lien in
' favor, of the lender; and
WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a Subordination Agreement to
that effect for the City's approval and execution.
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLYFD by Subordination t be City the
Rancho Cuca=Aga, California, that said
same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized W sign saiC
Subordination Agreement on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the
City Clem attest thereto.
�U
S j-c
Cny OF S
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGWE 3MG DIVMON
L
N
rrM- 8406 ORCHARD STREET
Trnm -
i.+c—li'14
o•
O•
o• o.
_
o•
. .
O G
O. (a
�Y
�Y
0Y
BIt
B•
BY �
.Y
..r
I •
I
.
: .
• .. .... ....
111
I ®.
BI•
I eM
B.•
eY
• B•
AY
BM OM
SY eM e
S j-c
Cny OF S
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGWE 3MG DIVMON
L
N
rrM- 8406 ORCHARD STREET
Trnm -
i.+c—li'14
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
GATE: February 1, 1989 OM-9-1-A
90: City Council and Acting City Manager
FROM: Russel H. Maguire, City Engineee
BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval and execution of a contract writ Hadole and Associates to
prepare plans, specifications and estimases for a storm drain and
street improvement protect in and East of Amethyst Street from 19th
north Street eetfunded byo Accohmt No. 23-4637-8865.
i 88 S. total amount of f18,276.00
BECOYifXDATIW:
Approval and Execution of a Contract with Madole and Associates to prepare
protect spec iandaEastsOfnAmethyst Street frm 4 hrStreet. north topHiollaand
Avenue In Engineers discretion, to be funded by Account lMo. -4637- 8865ncy at the City
BACKM )/AYALYSIS-
The
nt no Associates presently preparing
improvement alas for the reconstruction of Amethyst Street HihladAenuo
along with a portion of a Master Planned Storm Orain, for the development of a
residential subdivision. Part of the design work progress was to prepare
preliminary Information on the finished street design and storm drain
aliment, including part, of the proposed City protect. Therefore given the
familiarity with both the street and storm drain City protects. the firm of
design through Associates
City funded approached to provide a proposal to finish the
Respectful submitted,
RHM. • -.Pam
Attachment
52
RESOLUTION NO. 81-0q3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, TO AWARD AND EXECUTE A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT UITH MCDOLE AND
ASSOCIATES OF SAN BERNAPDINO, CALIFORNIA TO PREPARE
PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS 120 ESTIMATES FOR A:IE HYST STREET
AND STORM DRAIN IMPROYEMENTS FROM 19TH STREET TO
HIGHLAND AVENUE
NHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to Improve Amethyst
Street as a secondary size north -south thorougiifare between 19th Street and
Highland Avenue, and a Master Plan Storm Drain in the same area.
WHEREAS, the firm of Hadule and Associates has represented •s
qualified to perform the services in the Request for Proposal and was chosen
by the City Engirearing Staff to provide professional engineering services for
freld surveys, engineering design, studies and calculations for the
preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for the Area II Storm Drain
in and east of Amethyst Street from 19th Street north to Highland Avenue and
widening of Amethyst Street from north of 19th Street to Highland Avenue.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Ci
Rancho Cucamonga Ines hereby resolve to award and es
Services Agreement with Mauole and Associates to prc
engineering services to prepare plans, specification
Area II Storm Drain east of Amethyst Street from 19t
Avenue and widening of Amethyst Street from north of
Avenue. Such work shall be performed for a fee not
funded by Systems Develcpaent Fund Account No. 23-46
fund in an amount of 10% of the contract amount shal
use under the approval and direction of the City Eng
Change Order during the course of plan preparation.
'/
53
City of
issi onal
mates for the
forth to Highland
et to Highland
$18,276.00 to be
A contingency
established for
extra work or
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1989
TO. City Council and Acting City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Jersey Boulevard Storm Brain
Improvement project within Assessment District 82 -1 located
between Utica Street and Red Oak Avenue, awarded to Laird
Construction Company, Incorporated, for the amount of
$135,211.00 ($122,918.70 plus 10% contingency) to be funded
from Contract Service Assessment District 82 -1 Account
No. 834637 -6028
RECR#CMTI06:
It is recommended that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the gontract documents for the Jersey Boulevard Storm Drain
Improvement 11 ..p u Administrative Services Director expend $135,2.00 ($12291870 s O$ contingency) to be funded
from Contract Service Assessment District 82 -1 Account No. 834637 -6028.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
On December 7, 1988, Clty Council awarded the subject project to Laird
Construction Company, Incorporated. Staff has received the executed
contract documents, bonds and insurance dGenments; reviewed them and
found them to be ceaplete and in accordance with the contract proposal.
Respe y $ itted,
RNM:LRB:ly
cc Purchasing
Jerry Fulwood
M
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1989 �{
T0: City Council and Acting City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
By: Linda R. Beek, Jr. Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Execute contract for the Assessment District No. 82 -2 (Alta
Loma Storm Drain) Improvement Project located between Alta
Loma Basin Nv. 3 and Hermosa Avenue awarded to rolich a
contingency)) to amount
funded from tics ssmesnt6Distri t plus 84-2
Account Ho 80- 4637 -6028.
RECCW ENDATIOM:
It is rec.asanded that City Council authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the contract documents for the Assessment District No. 84 -2 (Alta
Lo," Storm Drain) Improvement Project, and authorize the Administrative
i to expend to be funded
No. 80 -463-6028. from ASessme Dtsr N 4_2 ACCOUnt
Background /Analysis
On December 21, 1998- City Council awarded the subject Project to Colich
a Sons. Staff has received the executed contract documents, bonds and
insurance documents; reviewed them and found them to be ecaglete and in
accordance with the contract proposal.
Respe ubmitied.
cc: Purchasing
55
t a
CITY OF RANCHO CIICAMOLIOA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1989
TO: City Council and Acting City Ganage^
FROM: Russell N. Moqulre, City Engineer
BV: Willie Valbuena, Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Approval of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien
Agreement submitted by Edward C. and Roxana M. Cardoza for
the property located at Bella Vista Drive
RECQND@ATION:
It 1s recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution
accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from
Edward C. and Roxana M. Cardoza and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk
to %ign same.
Background /Analysis
Mr. Edward C. and Roxana M. Cardoza have submitted the attached Real
Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement to guarantee the future
improvements to Bella Vista Drive In accordance with City Council
Ordinance No 58. This Ordinance allows the owner/builder to provide a
lien agreement for future street improvements as long as there is legal
access to the property and an offer to dedicate that portion of street 1s
submitted by the owner.
Bella Vista Drive is a private street allowing legal access to the
property. An offer to dedicate the portion adjacent to 9575 Bella Vista
has been submitted ano sent to the County Recorder's Office.
Respectful bmltted,
V RHM
Attachments
J
RESOLUTION 110. $ 5 -aqy
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY
IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM EDWARD C.
AND ROXANA M. CAROOZA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho :ucamonga adopted
Ordinance No. 58 on February 21, 1979, to establish requirements for
construction of public improvements in conjunction with building permit
issuance; and
WHEREAS, installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk pav,emrent, drive
approach and street lights established as prerequisite to issuance of building
permft for 8575 Bella vista Drive has been met by entry into a Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Edward C. and Rextria M. Cardoza.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES, does accept said Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien
Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs
the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San
Bernardino County, California.
�
'i
Yom'
`r
Sf7Z
' Qe,t
CITY OF 5s
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ENGRNEERM DIVISION
f IM.11 �. ]M tiMiti,M
1
W
T"
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1989
TO: City Council and Acting City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 1 to add local drainage
designs to the Church Street Widening Project, from Archibald Avenue
to Haven Avenue, by Norris- Repke, Inc , in the amount of $13,110 00
to bring the Contract total amount to $56,410.00 •,a he funded by
Account No. 224637 -8753.
RECRBEMOATICA•
Approval to Change r local dra1 esigg
Church Street Widening Project, from Archibald Aveue0 m vnAvenue, by
Norris - Repke Inc., in the amount of $13,110.00 to bran9 the Contract total
amount to $51,410.00 to be funded by Account No. 22 -4637 -8753.
DACKRKMLW LYSIS:
Tne firm of Norris - Repke was the successful bidder on the public project to
ofdtraffichandratconttinuousileftturn ulant. During -1view ofidplansaand
concepts being provided by the consultant, a need for additional design for
drainage and signal modifications at Haven Avenue was becoming apparent. It
was noted that in order to provide a rotatively flood free street between
Archibald Avenue and Hermosa Avenue, local area drainage needed to be
addressed as well as a caster planned line north of Church Street on Ramona
Avenue. The signal at Haven Avenue was earmarked for upgrade by the Traffic
Section at a later date, however to provide a mare ccaplete project with a
single construction period, it was determined that the upgrade should be
included with this widening project.
:eipec submitted,
RNM.MO: .pas
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE. FWuary 1, 1989
TO: City Council and Acting City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Mike Olivier, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 1 for modification of plans,
specifications and estimates for thus Amethyst Street Reconstruction,
Storm Drain and Traffic Signal at 19th Street Project, as required
by Caltrans for Norris-Repke, Inc., rn the amount of S7,38S.00 to
bring the Contract total amount to $14,385.00 to ba funded by
Account No. 22- 4637 -8749.
RECOOENDATION•
Approval of Contract Change Order Ho. 1 for modification of plans,
specifications and estimates for the Amethyst Street Reconstruction, stop
Drain and Traffic Signal at 19th Street Project, as required by Caltrans Jr
Norris- Repke, Inc., 1r, the amount of $7,389.00 to brfnyy the Contract total
amount to $14,385.00 to be funded by Account No. 22- 4637 -8749.
&AC3(OMOUWD AKV.YSIS.
The improvement plans for the Amethyst Street and 19th Streec Project were
submitted to Caltrans for review and several major changes were requested
which staff has attempted to comply with excrpt where unreasonable. Due to
major changes to the plans required, the contract amount was exceeded.
However, to complete the plans for submittal back to Caltrans, the City
consultant continued to redesign the street plans after the contract limit was
exceeded. This was done in order W meet submittal deadlines established by
Caltrans
Respectf 1 ubeftied.
i
a
1'
a
I
I
— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1983
TO: City Council and City Manager
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Ken Fung, Assistant Civil Engineer
la
d a
00JECT: Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II for the
proposed Sierra Madre Avenue and Plecida Court from Arrow Highway to
Via Carrillo Drive and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor
RECOKIIOATl(*:
It is hereby reeoumended that the Cit.Y Council adopt the attached Resolution
accepting and appr.ving the Envirorerental Initial Study Parts I and II for the
proposed Sierra Madre Avenue and Ploeidd Court fron Arrow Highway to Via
Carrillo Drive and issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor and direct tiro
City Clerk to file a Notice of Exemption pursuunt to the California
Environmental Quality Act.
RACK(ilOWAMALYINS
rhis report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the
Proposed Sierra Madre Avenue and Piacida Court from Arrow Hlghway to Via
Carrillo Drive.
In -onformance with the California Environmental Quality Act and State
C-4,10ines, the attached document has been prepared to perwlt construction of
the a rove- mentioned improvements.
Salr project entails the rehabilitation and repair of local streets plus the
instillation of street lights.
It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not
create a significant adverse impact on the environeent and therefor* recou mnd
that these improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt.
Respect 11 ubmitted,
RHM:KF:pam
Attachment
(o1
RESOLUTION NO. OC1'D Y�5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COURCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIROk?%NTAL
INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
FOR THE PibPOSED SIFMRA MADRE AVENUE AND PLACIDA COURT
FROM ARROW HIGHWAY TO VIA GARITLLO ORIVF
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
reviewed dll available input concerning the proposed Sierra Madre Avenue and
Placida Court. and
WHEREAS, an Environmental assessment Initial Study has been prepared
pursuant to the California Envtronarntal Quality Act, as amonded.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: Tho City Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the
Env Ironmen ssesscent Initial Study and issuance of j Catgorlcall Ex
for the proposed Sierra Madre Avenue and Placida Court.
SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption
pursuant to —ilie 4afffornta Environmental Qual',p Act.
�2
nin FWMONMENTAL REVIEW
o APPLICATION
t
1977 INITIAL STUDY - PART I
ELK,"&
For all protects requiring environmental review, this form must De compLted
and submitted p the Development P,eytep Cotmittee through the department wnere
the protect application is made. Upon receipt of .tA 13 department the
recoveendeelonsi to Plan Ong will Co Prepare Part PL fthgeCInitial Study and make
Of three determinations: (1) The protect wilCemmtssion will make one
environmental impact and a Negative Deelaratlon w111 beYetiTedsl�Z)fionoe
protect Report have a significant envlrorr4entai impact and an Environmental
moult Report Hill be prepared, or (3j An additional information reprrt
Should be ojectad by the eDpitcant giving further information eoneerntre the
Proposed Project.
Date Filed:
Protect Tit
Ibpltcant's Name, Address, Telephone; City of Rancho cucamonaa
no visi n 9320 Base Line Rd.. Rancho cucanan a,
Name, Address, Telephone of Person To 8e Con
tactge 9 91I3U
Concerning this Protect: Kenneth Fung, Assistant Civil Engineer,
714 -989 -1062 Ext. 325
t
Location of Proterr. sse___ _
Assessor's Parce} No.:
List other Permits necessary from local, regional
and the :gamey tssulry such permits: state and federal
�,.ti41:F agencies
G3
PROJECT DESCRiPT1013
Proposed use or proposed project: Project involves uavement rehabilitation,
construction of sidewalks, curbs anu outte,s. grive aournagpys a� nu inYtellattQL
of scree; liuhts
A:reage of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings,
if any:_
Describe the environmentai settii, of the project site including information
an topography, so st y, pants (treed)), land animals, any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects, land use of 9urroundl.,g properties, and the
description of any existing structures and their use (attach necessary
sheets): _
The stretch of Sierra Madre Avenue and Placlda Court under consideration is
Jrlmarll _residential. The terrain 1s relatively flot. The ,2avec*nt is in _
very poor condition Also, there is a lack of curb and gutters for proper
_urainace. There ere no sidewalks. People are forced to either walk on a narrow
one land tin each direction) strept or on lawns and driveways.
There are nu known cultural, historical or scenic aspects of any significance.
Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative
actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant
environmental impact
�•
b. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially
hazardous materials Such as toxic substances,
fla•snables or explosives? — X
Explenatlon of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary):
_T11irteen pature trees (10" 36" in diameter) alts four smaller trees (4"
in diameter) are scheduled for removal so that sioewalk may be Installed
7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project
will generate daily:
8. Estimate the ntacbar of auto and truck trips generated daily by this
project:
9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) r•_auired for this
project, in cubic yards: approx. 235U c.•-- of excavation
10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, compiete
the form on the next page.
CERTIFICATION: i hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this
initial evaluati- o the best of y ability, and that the facts, statements,
and information � .sated are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to
be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning
Division.
Date: 12,i"i1jLL-- � Signature 7�cc ,, ✓i y
Titlesietant Civil Engineer
YES n0
WILL THIS PROJECT:
1.
Create a oubstantial change in
ground contours?
— 1L_
2.
Create a substant.al change in
existing noise of produce
x
vibration or glare?
— --
3.
Create a substantial change in
demand for municipal
services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?
— i
4.
Create changes in the existing
Zoning or General
Plan designations?
— .X.—
S.
Remova any existing trees? Now CRAY? 17
.X_ —
b. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially
hazardous materials Such as toxic substances,
fla•snables or explosives? — X
Explenatlon of any YES answers above (attach additional sheets if necessary):
_T11irteen pature trees (10" 36" in diameter) alts four smaller trees (4"
in diameter) are scheduled for removal so that sioewalk may be Installed
7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this project
will generate daily:
8. Estimate the ntacbar of auto and truck trips generated daily by this
project:
9. Estimate the amount of grading (cutting and filling) r•_auired for this
project, in cubic yards: approx. 235U c.•-- of excavation
10. If the project involves the construction of residential units, compiete
the form on the next page.
CERTIFICATION: i hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in
the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this
initial evaluati- o the best of y ability, and that the facts, statements,
and information � .sated are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to
be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Planning
Division.
Date: 12,i"i1jLL-- � Signature 7�cc ,, ✓i y
Titlesietant Civil Engineer
7
RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
The following Information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division in order to aid the school district in assessing their
ability to accommodate the proposed residential development. Developers are
required to secure letters fro, the school district for accommodating the
I Increased mbar of stu4ants p to Issuance of building permits.
Name of Developer and Tentative No.:
Specific Location of Project:
PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL
1. Humaer of single
family units:
2. Number of multiple !_
family units:
3. Oata proposed to
begin construction:
4. Earliest date of
occupancy: _
Modell —
and 0 of Tentative
S. Bedrooms Pr1te Ranee
i/
9
1I
a
CITY OF JL44CHO CUC&OHCA
i
PART It - IHITLAL MMY
EWIROMMiTAL CHECRLIS'Y
APPLICAM City of Rancho Cueamnnod _
FILVG DATEt Loc mmut
PROJECT: Sierra H-d a Av+aue and vl, ida Court
PROJECT LOCATIM from Arrow Htahxay to Via _Carrillo Drive
I. EWIROMMMAL IMPACTS
(Explanatlon of all "yea" and "maybe" ansvers are requirad on attached
sheers) .
YES KAM NO
1. Soils and Ceoloev. Will the proposal have
significant results int
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes In
geologic relationships?
b. Disruptions, displ&c&nanta, compaction or
burial of the soil?
R —
C. Change In topography or grouad surface
contour intervals?
�• X.
d. The destruction, covering or codification
Of any dmiqua geologic or physical features?
_ _-
e. Any Potential increase in v:nd or water
erosion of so113, affecting either on or off
site c4uditons?
f• Changes its erosion siltation, or deposition?
g• Exposure of People or property to geologic
hazards sech as earthqua3as, landslides, mud-
slides, ground failure, or stn•'lar hazards?
h. An increase In the rate of extraction and /or
use of any miheral resource?
2. Hydrology. H111 the proposal have significant
results in: &I
YES a \Y] *_
--
I
A. Changes in currents, or the cuurs• of direction
of floulug streams, rivers, or ephemeral actsam
channels?
b. iii angeo in absorptioo races, drainage patterns.
or the rate and sraunc of surface vacer
runoff?
x
—_
c. Alterations to the course or floe of flood
waters?
_ --
d. Clung• In the amount of surface water in any
'r body of vacer?
e. Discharge into iurface voters, or any
alteration of surface water ruality?
f. Alceraclon of groundwater characteristics?
g. Changs in the Quantity of irounduators,
etcher through direct additions or with -
dravals, or through interference with an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?
x
h. The reduction in the amount of vatar 4ther-
vise avatlable for public water supplies?
x
I. Exposure of people or property co water
related hastrds such as flooding or saiches?
_
1. Air Quality. Vill the proposal have significant
results ins
a. Constant or periodic air emissions from mobile
or lndiroct sources?
x
Stationary sources?
'X-
b. Deterioration of amblent air quality and /or
Interference with the attafnm,nt of applicable
aft quality standards?
c. Alteration of local or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moisture
or temperature?
x
e. Biota
flora. 4111 the proposal have significant results
in:
A. Change in the eharaeteriseiet of species,
Including diversity, distribution, or number
Of any species of plants?
Y x
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants? 49%
_ __�
a. will the proposal altar the location, distri-
bution, density, divarsity, or growth rate oC I
the human population of an area?
b Will the proposal affect existing housing, or 1
creaca a demand for additional housing? -
6. Satin- [cgn ononic Factors. Will the proposal have
siificant results in:
a. Change lx local or regional tocia- economic
characteristics, including economic or
tomarcial diversity, tai: rate, and Property �
values?
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among protect beneficiaries. I.e.. buyers, 1
tax payers or project users?
?. land Dse and plannlno Conslderaelont. Will the
proposal have signtticant results fa?
a. A substantial alteration of the Present or 1
planned land use of an &Taal ._
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any goveremancal
ancities? X^'
C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing consurpcive or non- consuaptivs A
recr&ational oppottunicies? ��
e
I�
t
Y35 'UY3°_ Lo
c.
Introduction of new or disruptive species of
1
plants into an area?
_ —
d.
R*ductieh in the potential for agricultural
I
pitduction?
-- —
Fauna. Will the proposal have significant results
i
in
a
Chang* in rho characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or numb*ra
I
of any special of animals?
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any u-liqua, rare
or endangecad spacies of antxals?
X-
c.
Introduction of new or disruptive species of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier
to the migration or swvsaear, of actaals?
I_
d.
Datericration or removal of existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
--
S. popularion. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. will the proposal altar the location, distri-
bution, density, divarsity, or growth rate oC I
the human population of an area?
b Will the proposal affect existing housing, or 1
creaca a demand for additional housing? -
6. Satin- [cgn ononic Factors. Will the proposal have
siificant results in:
a. Change lx local or regional tocia- economic
characteristics, including economic or
tomarcial diversity, tai: rate, and Property �
values?
b. Will project costs be equitably distributed
among protect beneficiaries. I.e.. buyers, 1
tax payers or project users?
?. land Dse and plannlno Conslderaelont. Will the
proposal have signtticant results fa?
a. A substantial alteration of the Present or 1
planned land use of an &Taal ._
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any goveremancal
ancities? X^'
C. An impact upon the qulaity or quantity of
existing consurpcive or non- consuaptivs A
recr&ational oppottunicies? ��
e
I�
t
�seo
g• Iransoor1tqt � Y11
sesul�U aclon, Will the yo
•Y
have significant _
°• Generation of substantial
= xveaant? additional vehicular
b. Ef 4atr�et existi'uction7 existing streets. Or de--and for _•
1
c. dmandafon o
fisting parking faeilf
_
Parkin.? ales, or
d• Substantial Impact
x
upon °niacin
clan systems! t cran2Porca-
`
°• clan to present patte.g2 0 _
Lion or 00V°aeae og la
- -� x
peoplo and /oofcirc
War
1.
Alterations
+to or all xn present and
er- Dotge,
x
air traffic? ta27, 10324 transit or
S. Increases 1a eratfle d —
bteyellsea or pedeaerionsls to 10°cor vehtelas,
�— X
9. Cultural Resources, Rill the proposal Nava
to LSeanc reaulU Snr
•�"
°• A disturbance to the integrity of archsaologtcal.
Paleogcolottcal,
and /or historical resourc4al
10. Health.
Safety
Fropoeal and Nulsanee lac[o 8111 :he
v° sSgnllieane
raw` sul�j
°• 4zArd oa of any health hazard
hazardT
or potential health
b. ErPoaure of people to poeane3a2 health
X
hazards? _
t• A risk o! aaPloslon ~"-
or release
subs63neea in the o! heaardous
event of accident?
Aa d• increase fa eh* nuabar species of I adSvlduals r_
or 4pett o! v4ctor
X
or pachanog4nSe
the
ortanSsm for 4nposur4 of people to such
°• Increase in existing �•+
g noise levels?
X
f. Exposure of peoplo noise 14velst to dangerous ~<
+i
S The cr°ac:on Of ob 14cc1onable
odors?
h• An Increase In light
or glare?
11- Aatthatits. Vill the proposal have
xei rt, xaL +o
vesulta 1rt sigullLcaet
a• !ha obAructicn or dagradaclon of ony
vista
or view? scenic
b. The creation o! an acs chetieslly offensive
site.
t. A tonflioc with the ob duigna ad
or
potential scenic coprldoraTo!
12. Ueii ltiu and PL-1,11c Sarvleae. Will
the proposal
have a aSanlLieene aced �i acv systems, or
alterations
to the followings
a. F.iettrlC power?
b. Natural or packaged gas?
._.. •_� �
c• COm= unieaelons oysteasT
d. Water supply?
'
x
e. Wastewater :aeilltles,
r
f. Flood control structures?
X
I- Solid waste facilities,
_
h. Fire pro rseelae}
I
i- Police protection?
— —�
1• Schools?
k• Parks o s Other raereatleneL tae111ties7
I• Maintenance of public !.•L11tles. Includin
roads and flood g
X
control !a�- •!rig ■7
r• other govstmsneal cervices?
-- �-
17- £narn and Starts Rasou�e,, q !11 the proposal
have significant
results Ins
a Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
b• Substantial increase In denand upon existing
sour
sources of
_ X
--
energy?
c. M increase L n the demand for developosnc
new
of
sources if energyl
e. M Increase or perpetuation of the
— x
tonsuoption
of non- ranavabla Earns of energy. when feasible
renewable
sources of energy are
ravailable?
11 in
I
ly,
i
?a ;a d
a. Subseaatis: depletion of my nonrenewable or
scarce natural resource? x
14. Nandatery ilndincs e[ Slenitleanee.
A. Does the project have the pooantta to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habltar of fish or wildlife species.
cause a fish or vi.dlifa population to drop
below self austsiniig levels, throetan to
eliminate a plant or animal corscunity, reduce
the number or rsgtrict the range of a tars or
endangered plane or animal or eliminate
important ezamplas of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b. Doss the project have the poctntial to schleve
shoot- terut, to the disadvantage of long -earn,
enviromoncal goals? (A short -term tayact on the
aroHrament it one u?ich occurs in a reladvoly
brief, defLiitive period of time while long-
tam impaers will endure well into the future). _
_- %
e. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited. but Cumulatively
considerable? (Cumulatively considerable
means that the incrmental affect* of an
individual project are considerable when viewed
in connection vlth the effects of past projects,
I
and probable future projects).
d. Does the project have envitamantal effects
which will cause substantial advarsa sffscta
on human beings, either directly or iodiractly?
II. DISCUSSION OF rN7lWNNE4TAL EVALUATION (i.e., of alfiroative answers to
the above questions plus a discussion of proposed aititstion measures).
lb Excavation required to improve drainage.
2b New curb and gutters wilt facilitate better drainage.
luh Street lights are being installed.
t? Z
U
III, DLTSR4INATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation,
I find the proposed project COMD NOT have a significant efface
XX oa cho envimrmenc, ana aCATEGURICAL EXENMUN Bill be prepared.
I find that although the proposed pralect could have ■ •ignlfiaanc
affect an the envirameac, there will not be a significant affect
In this case because the mICIgatioa caesuras described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NCCATri -E
DECLARATION Will, DL PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant dfett or. the
1_J rnviraeeat, and an kNV1RO'O`WT LVACT REPORT is required.
Date_ UUUAB - �,k,�, 'y
SisuLture�
ASSiStent CiV11 Engineer
Title
�3
:ate
d
-- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1989
TO: City Council and Acting C+ty Manager
FROM: Russell w. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: 4enry M41rakoshi, Associate Civil Engineer
SUOIECT: Approval of the Environmental Initial study, Parts I and II for the
Proposed Avenida Vejar Street Improvement from Grove Avenue to
Sierra {ladre and Issuance of a Categorical Exemption therefor
RECOWMATION:
It is hereby recwmended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution
accepting and approving the Environmental Initial Study Parts I and II for the
proposed Avenida Vejar Street Improvement from Grove Avenue to Siaris Madre
and issuance of a CateguMcal Exemption therefor and direct the City Clerk to
file a Notice of Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act.
BACXGROftIANALYSIS
This report presents an Environmental Assessment Initial Study for the
Proposed Avenida Vejar Street Improvement frau Grove Avenue to Sierra Madre.
In conformance with the California Fnvironaantal Quality Act and State
Guidelines, the attached docusent has been prepared to permit construction of
the above - mentioned imp- ovements.
Said prnir, entails the r,thabilltation and repair of local streets plus the
fnstal'+ticn of street lights.
It is the Engineering Staff's finding that the proposed project will not
create a s.gniflcart adverse impact on the environment and therefore recomwnd
that thole improvements be classified as Categorically Exempt.
Ras,, a1Jy submitted,
R HM.
H am
Attachment
771
1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF I'HE CI " OF RANCHO
CUCAM NGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING (HE ENVIRONMENTAL
INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
FOR THE PROPOSED AVENIDA VEJAR STREET IMPROVEME)FIS FNOM
GROVE AVENUE TO SIERRA MADRE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has
: reviewed all available input concerning the proposed Avenida Vejar Street
Improvements; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Assessment Initial Study has been prepared
pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act„ as amended.
NOW, TdEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1: The Ciy Council of Rancho Cucamonga hereby a proves the
Environmmen a. ssesswnt Initial Study and issuance of a Categorical Exanption
for tht proposed Avenida Vejar Street Improvement.
SECTION 2: The City Clerk is directed to file a Notice of Exemption
pursuant to —"Ehe CaTTfornia Environmental Quality Act.
1�
In
ENMONMENTAL REimjpW
A.P:PLICAZZON
INITIAL STUDY — PART I
fE1'ERAL
For all projects requiring 'environmental review, this form must be completed
„ and submittal to the Development hvfef Conefttee through the depnrtmen't where
tho project application 1s made. Upon receipt of this application, the
Planning 0lvlston staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study and make
recon ndatfons to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission i •u�- 'ne
of three datermfoatfons: (1) Tlat project will have, no sigg,rifican•
environmental impact and a HegatlYe Declaration will be filed, (t) The
t project will have a significant e^vlrorpnental impact and an Environmental
IrtyaId Report will 6e prepared, or (3) AG additional Information report
shall ld 6e supplied by the appiican: giving further information ccnce,•ning the
Proposed project.
Date Filed
Project Title: Ada velar_ trrg�t lmeroveRents
Applicant's Name, Address, Telephone: Cityof Rancho Cucamolca _
_412119rcn I1nr R^rd tit hg Cutamonaa. CA 9173U (714) 58'+ -1862 _
Name, Address, Telephone of Person To 8e Contacted
Cencerning this Project: Henr• Hurakoshl. Associate Civil Ennfneer
�•+�' ahns�
Location of Project: gvenda from G+ove to Sierra Hadre Averuc —
Assessor's parcel- NO...
,.1st other permli -s necessary from local, regional, state and f'ederahtes
and the agency 1s5uing Stich permits:
None
/14
n
i
environmental Impact �g� indlvlduall' small, may as
PAOJE� DES S -TP�
Proposed use or proposed project; pav nt
Qs-.an
4. 9+ �ttats..�stwvK_'1{4haet,.,�_. _
of project area and square footage of existing and proposed buildings,
Describe the envfrornental settin of the Protect site Including lifonoation
on topography, yo sta /1
des= rhistorical ar Beanie aspactsy� (trees esurroundin
lpptfon of an land anlntals, any cniturat
sheets Y existing structures use Pertles
and , their g pr(attaeh > and the
h stretch of Avenida v� a...._.__ _ necessary
`77
a series of eG°utative
a whole have significant
S^
HILL THIS PROJECT
I• Create a substantial change {
n ground
YES Ho
contours?
Z• Create a substantial change In existing noise
vibration or
glare? of produce
3. Create a subsc 'till change in demand for
services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)?Icfpal
a• Create changes
in the existing Z•itng or General
Plan designations?
S. Remove any existin y
9 trees? How many? 9
X
6. Create the need for use or disposal Of
hazardous materials such as
x
flamnabies or expiossuch toxic substancestially
ExPlanacfon of any YES answers above (attach additional
sheets
if necessary):
7. Estimate the amount of sewage and solid waste materials this protect
will genera daily.
8. Estimate the number of
protect: auto and truck trips gena:ated dail b
9 Estimate the Y Y this
Protect, t amount of gradl"9 (cutting and fillip
cubic yards: 9) required for this
10. If the project
the next page lnyolves the construction of residential units c
arm o.
the f
mplete
Cle attached I hereby certify that the statem_nts furnished above and 1n
tie attached exhibits present the data and information required for this
Initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements,
and information presented are true and correct to the best of m
belief. I further understand that to
tnfthebest f
be submitted before an adequate information can be Y k "require and
Ofvision• Y be required to
Oate• /Z made by the Plannfne
--
fl?
Signature
f.ry.
Titleoc�ato rl•� c
— r
O
e
a
CITY or XANC110 CUCxMOHGA
PART II - INITIAL STUDY
EIMROMWTAL CHECMIST
rILZNG DATE: LOO MUR :__
PROJECT,
PROJECT LOCATION:
1. EW MITNTAL Ilv?ACTS
(Explanation of all "yea" and "maybe" answers are :squired on attached
sheets).
1. Soils and Gaoloev. Will the proposal have
significant results In:
a. Unstable ground conditions or in changes in
geologic relationships?
b. Disruptions, displacamants, compaction or
burial of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground surface
contour intervals?
d. The 4astruction, :overing or sodificatian
of any unique geologic or physical features?
e. Any potential increase in wind or eater
arosic:' of soils, affecting either an or off
site conditons?
f. Changes in erosion siltation, or deposition?
S. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, cud -
slldes, ground failure, or similar hazards?
h. An increase in the race of extraction and /or
uss of any mineral resource?
2. Hvdrolosy. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
YES NAYDE NO
_x —
x
x
_ x
N
i
YES :AY3= _D •" 1
a• Changes in currants, or the course of direction
of flowing streams,
rivers, or ephemeral straa.
Channels?
_
- -•
h changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and acaunt of surface water
runoff?
X
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
uatara?
—
--
d. Chang* In the amaunc of surface water in any
body of water?
e. Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface wacgF quality?
w_ X
f. Alteration of groundwater characteristics?
X
g. Chanas to the quantity of groundvacars,
either through direct additions or wlth-
dravais, or through interference vich an
aquifer?
Quality?
Quantity?
X
h. :he reduction In the amount if water other-
visa available for public water supplies? _
- --X
I. Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards fuel, as flooding or saiehos?
1. Air QUalfty. Will the proposal have signiflcant
soul ea Sue
A. Constant or periodic air emissions fro. mobile
or Indirect sources?
X
Staclonary sources? �-
--
b Dltariaration of ambient air quality and /or
Smterfnteacs with the actsinmant of applicable
air quality stannards?
X
c. Alteration of lcea'_ or regional climatic
conditions, affecting air movement, moixture
or temperature?
--
4 blots
r' =r ±• till? the proposal have significant results
+. Change In the characteristics of species,
including diversity, distribution, or number
of any species of planes?
b Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or eadangerld species
X
of plants! n o
�6 V
Yyrs n�—Ly3_ n
c. Introduction of new or disruptive species of x
plants into an area?
d. Raductich in the potential for agricultural x
pladuction?
Feuua. Will the proposal have significant results
in
a. Change in the characteristics of species.
Including diversity, distribution. or numbers x
of any species of anieala? —
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rare x
or andengered amebas OL animals?
a. Introducrlom of new or disruptive apaCies of
animals into an area, or result in a barrier x
co the migration or mvmaO- of animals?
d. Deterioration or removal of esisciag fish or --
wildlife habitat?
S. population. Will the proposal have significant
results in:
a. Will the proposal alter the location, distri-
bucion, dansicy, diversity, or growth rate of x
the human population of an area?
b Will the proposal affect existing housing. or x
create a damand for additional housing? -
6 Sims- Econcoic Factors. Will the proposal have
aigaitieant results in:
a. Change in local or regional nccio- economic
charaacarisc ;cs, including sconcuie Or
comerciai diversity, tax rata, and property —^
values? --
b. Val project coats be aqua -sbly distributed
swag project beneficiaries, i.e.. buyers,
tax payers or prujcct users?
I. Land Us• and Flannln: Cansidera c ions. Val the
proposal have signiticanc results in?
a. A subscencial alteration of the present or x
planned land use of an eras? _..
b. A conflict with any designations, objectives,
policies, or adopted plans of any SOVernmintal
entitles?
a. An impact upon the qulaicy or quantity of
existing cons=;)CLva or non- consunpcive x
recreational opportunities? 3 ( —
g• 7ransoortaefon. Will the
N
1�9
reaul— Proposal have Significant
' Congestion of substantial additlena,
�vaa:ent? t7
vehicular
b Effects on existing acre. te,
nav street cons[ °r d....d for
ruction?
X
c. Effects on existing packing faeiLL ties, or
damard for new parking!
d Substantial !,pact
X
upon exiscln
[ton syscama? g [rasa porea-
i
e• Alteration. to present
Clan or ,ovemant of Dateerna of eircula-
—_ °
Deople and /or goods?
f•
Alterations to or elf
Po ueec. on present
ncial vatar- borne, rail, and
air traffic? ,ass transit
or
g• Increases is traffic hazards to Motor
hlcycllata
or pad.scriano? vehicles,
9, Cultural Resources. Will the
Bn,.lcaoc reaulca in; Ptopoaal have
a• A leontologic co the integrity of archaeological•
pal eoncologleal, and /or
historical resources?
10. Heal•h. Safety
p COD vi eland Nuiaanee Factors. Will the
gnil Coact
I_
reaulca in;
a• Creation cf any health hazard
hazard?
or potent,., health
b• ExP °sure of people to potential has lth hazard.?
to A rick
tin
X
ce
aul.vexncea fa the
theoe or release
• o! hazardous
event of as accident?
d.
in
° pecieseo! vthe "=bar of lndlvidw.,c
r -JL..
organiays or the or paeh.nogenle
organisms? exposure o:? people to such
e• Inereasa in existing noise Lev lat
f Exposure
u -...
noise l evela ?eOple to P °ten dally dangerous
X
—_
9 the nreaclon of objet tionable
~— L
odors?
h. An Increase in light
or glare?
8 —�
i
■
14
A
YES
n1Y3° NO
11 Aesthetics. Will the proposal have significant
rasulta in:
A.
Tho obfcruction or degradation of any scenic
vista or view?
X
b.
The creation of an aesthetically offensive
site?
c.
A conflict wi.h the objective of designated
or potential scenic corridors?
12. Utilities and Public Services. Will the proposal
have a 31gUIficaet need for now systems, or
alterations to the follwing:
a.
Electric power?
b.
Natural or packaged gas? _
1
C.
Comunications systems?
d.
Water supply?
e.
Wastwator facilities?
-L
f.
Flood control struccuros? _
-L
S.
Solid waste facilities?
%
h.
Fire protection? _
X
I.
Police protection?
X
J.
Schools?
%
k.
Parks or other recreational facilities? _
_- X
1.
Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads and flood control facilities? _
L.
m.
Other governasntal servicen?
i
17. Enarey an e d Searc Resourcas. Will the proposal
have algnilieant results in:
a.
Use of substantial or excessive fuel or energy?
X
b.
Substantial increase In dcmand upon axistina
sourtat of energy?
c.
An Increase in the deaand for devalopnenc of
new sources of energy?
d.
An increase or perpetuation of the cons=pclon
of non- renawabla fora: of energy, when feasible
renewable sources of anargy are available?
A
? e,5
YES
e. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable or
stares natural resource? r
14 Handseory FLndinea of Siani!SCance.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the Quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or vildlit, population to drop
below self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate A plant Or talmal community, reduce
the nimber or restrict the range of a Tara or
endangered plant or animal or elirlmata
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? x
b. Does the project have the poiancial to achieve
shcrc -cera, to the disadvantage of long -corn,
environmental goals? (A short -term impact on the
environment is ant which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time while lOng-
term impacts will endure yell into the future).
c. Does the project have impacts which are
Individually limitem, but crosulatively
considerable? (Cunulativaly considerable
means that the incremental effects of an
individual project are considstebla when viewed
In connection with the effscca of past projects,
and probable future projects), r x
d Does the project have anvironmencal affects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or Indirectly? x
II. DISC.SSION 11 Ebti 7.A0l M4TAl %vA*_VATION (i.e.. of affirmative answers to
the above Quea dons plus a dLeusssion of proposed mitigation measures).
t,
,c
{
I-
111. DETE.0..INATTON
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find the.proposed prof act cOMM NOT have a sijniflcanc affect
X an the envicnnoeac, end a CATEGORICAL EXENPTION vill be prepared.
I Lind chat although the Proposed Project could have a eignificanc
effect on the enviranaenc, there vill not be a significant effect
in this case because the nitigstioo ousurns described an an
attached $hest have been added to tna P:oiect. A NEGATIVE
DECL'.RATZ04 HILL BE PREPARED.
QI find the p.vposed *project MY have a significant offset on the
envir=ant, and an MVIRO4tM?T IMPACT REPORT is required.
Date /2-} -16
o
, Ik- -4 ,
Signature
Ii EP4Se
Title
llje .
I..
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1989 fla.
TO: City Council and Acting City Manager CCJJ��
F.."M: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Gary H. Sheu, Assistant Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Approval of intention for Reimbursement of the coft of
Faster Plan Storm Drain construction along Vineyard Avenue
in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit 87 -26, located
at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard
Avenue
RECON OWTIOM:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution for
reimbursement of cost of Master Planned Storm Drain Construction along
Vineyard Avenue from Cucamonga Creek Channel,, to 549 feet east of
centerline of Carnelian Street.
BACKGROUND /A.NALYSIS
O.A.S. Investors, the developers for the northeast corner of Vine)�ard
Avenue and Foothill Boulevard development is required to construct alcove
mentioned storm drainage facilities as condition of approval for such
project. City has budgeted that storm drainage facilities as part of the
capital improvement projects in the next two years. According to Section
13 O8.080 of the Rancho cucamonga Municipal Code, City will reimbirse
developers the cost of construction wmich exceeds the storm drainage
fee. The amount of reimbursement will be fully paid in two years. The
i_urce of reimbursement 1s from "planned drainage reimbursement fund"
under the provision of Section 13.08 080 of the Rancho cucamonga
Municipal Code. if the cost of construction exceeds the amount from
°planned drainage reimbursement fund` the difference will be paid from
that year's Capital improvement Fund.
Res pec I 11 submitted,
L
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit A
.0
RESOLUTION NO gq,l7y /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNMINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO EXECUTE A REIM5URSEMENT
AGREEMENT WITH O.A.S INVESTORS FOR THE CONSTRUCTIOU OF A
PORTION OF THE MASTER PLAN STOR4 DRAIN LINE (2 K) ALONG
VINEYARD AVENUE FROM CUCAHONGA CREEK CHANNEL TO 549 FEET
EAST OF CENTERLINE OF CARNELIAN STREET
WHEREAS, O.A.S. investor 1s required as condition of Approval for the
Conditional Use Permit Pa. SY -26 to construct storm drain facilities along
Vineyard Avenue at Carnellan Street to provide flood protection to the
development;
KHEREAS, a portion of that storm drain facility is a part of the
adopttd comprehensive master planned storm drain system, more particularly
described as the Storm Drain from station 10+39.09 to station 17+78.35
including the catch basins and lateral on Carnelian Street and Arroyo Vista
Avenue but excluding line '0' as shy »m on the City approved plan drawing No.
1268.D, sheet 8 of 17 The said plen drawing is made a part of this
resolution by reference;
WHEREAS, this portion of the Master Planned Storm Drain is budgeted
for construction as capital improvement project and is scheduled to be
completed in two years.
WHEREAS, Section 13.08.080 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code
made a provision to refmtrurse a subdivider when Master Planned Storm Drain 1s
constructed by the subdivider, for the cost of construction which exceeds the
storm drain fee
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
The Developer, at the developer's own expense will install the
planned storm drainage facilities us mentlonpd herein afore.
In consideration of Developer's installation of said planned
drainage facilities. City will not assess Developer the fee
described in Chapter 13.06 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal
Code.
The cost of cnnstructing the planned storm drainage facilities
will be reimbursed in two reftbursement cycles.
Vp
CITY COUNCIL STAFF PEPORT
CUP 87 -28
FEBRUARY 1, 1989
PAGE 2
f.
4. The Developer will submit the direct cost of const,iiction of the
said Planned drainage facilities to the City Engineer .to later
than March 30 to be eligible for the payment through ttie month
of August of the same year. The cast of constructien will bs
revle%er., approved or adjusted by City Engineer.
S. The anproved construction cost will be reimbursed from "planned
drab .ge refaburscitent fund" under the provision: of Chapter
13.(14 of the rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. If tto cost of
construction exceeds the amount from "Planned drainagye
reimbursement fund` the differ -nce will be paid by Cltv's
Capital improvement fund. More specifically, If tie amount in
the first reimbursement cycle is less than :0% of the total
reimbursement amount the difference will be paid from the City's
Capital Improvement Fund. If the developer's share from planned
drainage reimbursement fund in the second reimbursement cycle is
less than the balance of the reimbursement amount, the
difference will be paid from that years Capital Improvem::nt
Fund.
1S
Iffil
ra'
;Y• �� iT
t
ix
1
n
r
x
m
M
m
i�
F'-t
it �•
li
It
=
M)(-'iT
fflJ
ffiff�f4ff�f
lay.
�1�
1
�,�;�i.,f►hi1�=
F b
1
1•
i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1989
TO: City Council and Acting City Manages-
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY:
SUBJECT*
RECONElliATIOM:
Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Civil Engineer
Staff reccanends that the City Council adopt the. attached Resolution.
DISCUSSION:
On January 18, 1989, the City Council heard the applicant's appeal of several
conditions of approval. The attached Resolution reflects the Council's
decision to approve all the conditions seu forth in planning Comstsslon
Resolution No. 88 -177 except for the following uodificatiGns.
1. Delete Condition Nos. 3 and 7 under the Tentative Tract
Map heading; and
2. Change the first word "Surety" to "Security" in Standard
Condition ho. L.7.
Respec tted,
RHM:JS dlw
Attachment
1�O
1
i RESOLUTION No. 8I - Dy S
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAiONGA APPROVING A REQUEST FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 13738
TO PERMIT DEVELOPMENT OF AN 18 -LOT RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION ON 12.88 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND LOCATED SOUTH OF AL3OND STREET
AK V-ST OF SAPPHIRE STREET - APR: 1061 - 091 -03
R` A. Recitals.
(t) Rodine Companies Inc. has filed an application for the
approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 13738 described above in the title of this
Resolution. Hereafter, in this Resolution the subject Tentative Tract
request is referred to as "thn Tentative Tract".
(ill On Septeabar 14, 1988, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter
of the Tentative Tract, and following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted
their Resolution No. 8a -177 (attached as Exhibit "1 ") thereby approving the
Tentative Tract.
(iii) The applicant has filed a timely appeal of the approval
represented fn said Resolution No 88 -177 on the basis of several Conditions
contained in %aid Resolution. The Conditions appealed are described as listed
on attached Exhibit "2 ".
(iv) On November 16, 1988, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed pubic hearing on the subject matter of the
appeal of the Tentative Tract and, on said date referred the subject matter of
the appeal back to the Planning Ccmmission to review the Supplemental
Information received by the City C- uncil.
(v) On 0eceL$er 14, 198C, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject matter
of the Tentative Tract, and following the conclusion of said hearing,
recomended to the City Council the deletion of Condition Nos 3 and 7 under
the Tentative Tract Ma heading, and the retention of all other conditions in
saidl�n1o0utioF - 88 =177.
(vi) On ,.anuary 18, 1989, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on tne subject matter of the
appeal of the Tentative Tract and, on said date concluded the public hearing
(vii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have OCCLrred
H
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO,
TENT TRACT 13738
FEBRUARY 1, 1989
PAGE 2
0. Resolution.
1 NO'J, THEREFORE, it is found, determined and resolved by the City
Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. This Council hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in comllance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and concurs with the issuance of the mitigated Negative
Declaration issued on September 14, 1988.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above - referenced January 18, 1989 hearing, including written staff
reports, the minutes of the above - referenced September 14, 1988 and December
14, 1988, Planning Commission meetings, the contents of Planning Commission
Resolution No. 88 -177, and the Developer's written and oral testimony, this
Council specifically finds as follows:
a. The Tentative Tract applies to property located west of Sapphire
Street and south of Almond Street within the Very Low
Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre);
b. The property to the north is within tha Hillside Residential and
1s currently vacant, the property to the south and east is
within the Very Low Residential District and is currently
developed, and the property to the west is a City of Los Angeles
Department of Water and Power Utility Right -of -Nay.
C. Tne Tentative Tract contemplates the development of an miot
subdivision on 12.38 acres of land;
d. The requirements of Planning Commission Resolution W 88 -177
remain to be important and necessary to the subdiv ter of the
property except for the following modifications:
1. Delete Condition No. 3 and 7 under the Tentative Tract Ha
heading; and
2 Change the first word "Surety" to "Sec4rity' in Standard
Condition Na L. 7.; and
9tz,
CITY COUNCIL RESOLMON NO.
TEAT TRACT 13738
FEBRUARY 1, 1989
PAGE 3
e. The development as specified will not contradict the goals or
objectives of the General Plan or Development Code of the City
of Pzncho Cucamonga and would not promte a detrimental
condition to the persons or properties in the immediate vicinity
of the subject site.
4. Based on the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts s..t forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
I The Tentative Tract is consistent with the General Plan and
Development Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga;
t Tie design or improvements of the Tentative Tract is consistent
with the General Plan and Development Code of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga;
c. The subject site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed;
d. The dasign of the proposed development is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or avoidable injury to humans
or wildlife or their habitat;
e The development is not likely to cause serious health problems;
f. The design of the development will not conflict with any
easement required by the public at large, now of record, for
access through or use of the property within the proposed
development; and
9 The requirement that the Developer pay in -lieu fees for the
future undorgrounding of existing overhead utilities (Condition
2. under the Tentative Tract MaP heading) does meet the
requirements set forth in Government-code Section 66001 in te•ms
of (1) purpose (2) use (3) type of development, and (4) need.
%3
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
TENT TRACT 13738
FEBRUARY 1, 1989
PAGE 4
{
' 5, Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
# 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves the Tentative Tract subject
to all of the Conditions set forth in Planning Coasaission Resolution No. 88-
177 (a copy of which is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit "1') except for
the following modifications:
t° d. Delete Condition Nos. 3 and 7 under the Tentative Tract F>,o
r <: heading, and
b. Change the first word "Surety' to Security' in Standard
I Condition No. L.7.
6 The Council hereby provides notice to Rodine Companies, Inc.
that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by the
Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of
Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
7, The City Clerk is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the
adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of
Cois Resolution, Lion, by Certified address rill. City Return Receipt quested, to Rodine
mom
1q
RESOLUTION NO. 68 -177
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO MISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAPANGA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 13730,
AND DESIGN REVIEW THEREOF, LOCATED SOUTH OF ALMOND AM DISTRCT
WEST F (LESSOTRAN 2PDNELLIIS. UNITS PEER ACRE) T1 APN jail-MI1 I03
A. Recials.
(I) Rodine Companies Inc. has filed described n the title for the
Resolualonf Tentative rrain this o. 137388 zthessubject Tentative Tract this ct Map
request is referred to as -the application".
(ti) On the 144th of Septet:Der, 1988, the Planning Coemelz1 of the
city Rancho nd conclude dasaid hearing ondulyt date. noticed public hearing on the
(iii) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B Resolution.
Planning
NOW FORE, City hereby Rancho 9a�asnfollowsresalved by the
1 This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth n the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct.
i
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above- referenced public hearing on September l4, 1988, Including
written and oralspeeifltally Plods tope er with public testianny, this
(a) The application applies to property located on the west
feet along pShire Street, d 55 Almond
feat alongeAlmondaAvenuetanao /sapresently
vacant, and
(b) The property to the north ro ertysto the ssouth sOfathat
and designated for Hillside residential, the D D
site consists of single family residential in the very Low Residential
District, the property to the east is single family a west 1n the Very
Low RatedeasiLos Districttureau of the and�Light easementt is vacant and
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
public hearing specific findings of
during the above
facts set forthin parag ap Iand 2aboe, this commission
concludes as follows: q5 EXIAWAf °1
( 1L OF 1a'.)
RESOLUTION No. 88 -a,/
TENTATIVE TRACT 13738 - ROOINE
September 14, 1988
Page 2
(a) That tentative tract is consistent with the
General Plan, Development Code, and specific
plans; and
(b) The design or improvements of the tentative
tract is consistent with the General Plan,
Development Code, and specific plans; and
(c) The site is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed; and
(d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to
cause substantial environmental damaga and
avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or
their habitat; and
(e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause
serious public health problems; and
(f) The design of the tentative tract will not
conflict with any easement acquired by the
public at large, now of record, for access
through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision.
4. This Commission hereby finds and certifies that the project has
been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and, further, this Commission hereby issues a Negative
Declaration.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraph
1, 2 and 3 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to
each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard
Conditions attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Design Review
1. The shape of the window panes on Model 1500 shall be square in
shape rather then rectangular.
2 The round vent element shall be provided with more finished
details, such as louvers or surrounding trim, on all deviations.
3 The round vent on the rear elevation of Model 1OQOA shall be
increased in size.
4. The square window on the front elevation of Model 10000, Type 1,
shall be changed in shape to be more compatible with window shapes on the
three other elevations. Q
S. The following roof tile colors shall be omitted: 'Life style
Mission" (0132) and °Life style Padre Brown" (0110). avisier w y„
RESOLUTION NO. 88 -1.1
TENTATIVE TRACT 13738 - RODINE
September 14, 1988
Page 3
6. Tree Removal Permit No. 88 -16 is approved subject to replacement
te ne accordance with Municipal Code 19.08.100. xn S trees
o he re in tained sall beD octein accordance with Mnipal Code ection
19 08.110.
S •-Live Tract Map
1. Provide a drainage acceptance letter authorizing public areas to
drain onto private land.
2. Werhead Utilities:
a. Sapphire Street - An 1n -lieu fee as contribution to the
future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities
(telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite (east)
side of Sapphire Street shall be paid to the City prior to
approval of the Final Map.. The fee shrll be one -half the
City adopted unit amount times the length from the center
of Almond Street to the south tract boundary.
b. Almond Street - The existing overhead utilities on the
project •ide of Almond Stree: shall be undergrounded from
the first pole an the east side of Sapphire Street to the
first pole west of the centerline of the Los Angeles Bureau
of Power and Light Easement prior to public improvement
acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. For the
telecomwnl atlon) a the developer may (electrical st each
reimbursement agreement to receive one -half the City
adopted cost for undergrounding from future development
(redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the
street. For the portion adjacent to the tract, an in -lieu
fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the
utilities on the opposite (north side of almond Street
(electrical) shall be paid to the City prior to Final Map
approval. The fee shall be one -half the difference between
the undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical) on
the opposite side of the street minus those
(telecommunications) on the project sine times the length
from the center of Sapphire Street to the first pole
containing both electrical and telecommunication lines west
of the west tract boundary
3 The southerly one half (26 foot of pavement) street improvements
along Almond Street shall be extended from the tract westerly to the
centerline of the Los Angeles Bureau of Power and Light Easement.
4. All street shall have a centerline crown section. Street tilt
sections are not permitted. 9
S. The dedication for the north half (33 feet) of Almond Street
from Skyline Road to the east side of Sapphire Street shall b obtained in
accordance with Condition 6 to follow. RXNI�IT _ 1"
RESOLUTION i10. a- 177
TENTATIVE TRACT 13738 - ROOINE
September 14, 1988
Page 4
G. The developer shall mute a good faith effort to acqyuire the
required off -site property interest necessary to construct the requirtd off-
if site mat lea t 120 daYyhpriorvto�submlttal ofat the tfi al map the or approval,
Government codagreement 6ec41on 66462 atOsuchttimcomplete as the City acquiresstherproperty
pnayeenttsbYedevaloperfor
ofthe allprco�ntin connection�.tphp sthel subdiivision1.
Security for these costs shall tbhein the form
or theareQ traedooff-site atproperty
of the security reflecting
interest shall be the amount given is an appraisal report roved obtained
by y
developer, at developer's cast. The appraiser shall have been approved by the
City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
7 An emergency access road P er Fnoth111 Fire District's
requirements shall be provided along Almond Street to Turquoise Street.
8. A sidewalk shall be provided on one side only of the interior
,treet.
9. The Almond Intercept Master Plan Channel (Line 1A) shall be
constructed from the existing purtion to the southwest extending to a
necessary to Drovlide drainage Drotectton for the Tract Street
s approved by the City
Engineer. The cost of constructing the facility 1s eligible for
reimbursements in accordance with City Ordinance No. 75.
10. Almond Street shall be constructed full width from Henry Street
to Sapphire Street. A reimbursement agrteoent may be requested for the cost
of improvements of the north half of the street from future development on the
north side of the street.
6. The Secretary to this Comission shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1988-
PLANNING COI, ISSION OF THE CITY OF REIMBURSEMENTS IN CUCAMONGA
BY:
RESOLUTION ItO. BB -1,t
TENTATIVE TRACT 13738 - RODINE
September 14, 1968
Page 5
w�
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Reimbursements in Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly and regultrty introdu:ed, passed, and adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Reimbursements in Cucamonga, at a reoular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 140 dry of September, IM, by the
following vote -to -wit:
r AYES: MMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY, ENERICK, CHITIEA, NC NIFL, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMII:ISIONERS: NONE
I
"
WAMISIT 1L
■
�
IFP
�
�I
ON
I
\
f
|
|
■
|
I
i
|
{. / @:
� !� 714 /|
� l 1TY !
= =
U�
_§ /fl s
\
� 162 ,
| ! J�/
aRif
|!
■ ||
|
|Z
«
!f
||
|
K
&
�
p
�
■
|
`
�
�
|�\
f f �f
■
|
#
! | �E
|
.�
||
� � ■`i
a
�
■
�
}
�
��
!
|• �
a
|
f
|
|
■
|
I
i
|
{. / @:
� !� 714 /|
� l 1TY !
= =
U�
_§ /fl s
\
� 162 ,
| ! J�/
aRif
|!
■ ||
|
|Z
«
!f
||
|
K
&
�
p
�
■
N
X
r
rj
V Ps
IrrF Q
iF�F�F
CS jX1
SS
wrr-
an5�
1211i
=a
IF
-e F3
rFfLS
.RaF:
' Y
HIM
F;i•
Ifgf
cc�aEF
pip�`q
f r i�E
RFcI�-
Rlr?!
j ler jZf£�F!
� �plis�s
a
WOE=--
$-i:F6F6
�a� FfR.-
FF��'F1
F^pR;Ss
3 FEE=t
FC�l�g'
�ssE ?a
i aut �€
E i[[
if fgrgE
w
S E
�RR
of E�F p
f� �€ `�a
• :sr
!
• w
ISE
�s�
a
E; S
r= i
�gF
rFF
it
?Fr SI
R:
fly!
Ei l
=F s
_3
is sCIE
}�
aq
IO r1
F�s Fq
E.c.. F0.
ica ii
FL AIMEE
tA_�g�F�fR
V
p�x
nF_fir =�F
cicgiJ =ar
e• e'a if
a`FJF�==f
1R -rZiff
pA''�
g s
g oars
�p`S��iF1i
-4r�:aai
I
i
�ttF
gill 112p
W. U28 :1
Eml Frf ]
F4 pf
x.• c*_ t
?A£3
Is-
Igo RFRz
j "sR c -C!
RI!' i'i7f
c?'r C�!
lsF�i ifc,-
0
W
�
Y
S
f
r ^!
5r�i=
z
JFSR
(��
Q�_
E-t
3a
1F14
'r
F�
F "1
��
ref
•c�r
a
4=
p�txs
F
PRS
€a
la
fig
ffRF
if
.!ry
F
Par
Rlr?!
j ler jZf£�F!
� �plis�s
a
WOE=--
$-i:F6F6
�a� FfR.-
FF��'F1
F^pR;Ss
3 FEE=t
FC�l�g'
�ssE ?a
i aut �€
E i[[
if fgrgE
w
S E
�RR
of E�F p
f� �€ `�a
• :sr
!
• w
ISE
�s�
a
E; S
r= i
�gF
rFF
it
?Fr SI
R:
fly!
Ei l
=F s
_3
is sCIE
}�
aq
IO r1
F�s Fq
E.c.. F0.
ica ii
FL AIMEE
tA_�g�F�fR
V
p�x
nF_fir =�F
cicgiJ =ar
e• e'a if
a`FJF�==f
1R -rZiff
pA''�
g s
g oars
�p`S��iF1i
-4r�:aai
I
i
�ttF
gill 112p
W. U28 :1
Eml Frf ]
F4 pf
x.• c*_ t
?A£3
Is-
Igo RFRz
j "sR c -C!
RI!' i'i7f
c?'r C�!
lsF�i ifc,-
0
W
hK t.411 I.Zo�
N }
ir. - E -r -fi g ;�' Ra c= � r.. E lip iIaP
d Fa' vex= F� �r FEi f s z
ect3�sP g-i 'g �l '
i �
ic' Egx a3f :V
a r
��Ix�__
E Er "RfEF ai g s tj �.F
xe13i l` r5! E c~ t E =i= ;
Ey'T "i
It
92 !21 rSE- ice
fSA�;n ie. as serf � a �x ie E�x a:R
€sEEi � j Sit ;�i l3ia Rt E Hi- �s P-
ji
s =� Ei� qc E
?3 r= ie is csgaR_ex =e sg ;gF bg Eca BB C
t ga_o :._`t�$rrF.
S EE -k:eE a3ff=
S!ii s k°
ry� �z
r iR c`� �rec_r.3� FFP-
_ sg E � �'E3-`:FEF£x rc rE z g e:i Ef
XW
�. 3$? a Prbc c.5r::RR6n d! ?e x R$ i:ex
s
n
0
W
a
b
:K �-
e
r ec
ai A F�
WIN
1 :j
3cj p_.
s
E aip -��
fx
°alai
c
d"
irigs FFt r_
i
ca. sF cc�F �cF �r F ✓< ai�F
• I 0 � I
?�
If
ii
�•
f
?Qg j
�e-
E Q
naF-
=qR
i
i�i�
e1p
Fa
3 - --
lk
Fa'�
� ci
_
32
.F
5E
gar[
ft�
R!s
Stri
i
FSe
s
P
n�v
e3
92
w if
%F
Eoi
��1
t
:K �-
e
r ec
ai A F�
WIN
1 :j
3cj p_.
s
E aip -��
fx
°alai
c
d"
irigs FFt r_
i
ca. sF cc�F �cF �r F ✓< ai�F
• I 0 � I
?�
F
r ?
I6
/O5
I
i
R �fR
i s�a "'11111
st
i4 S Ua
W 1;
I - p-
q�f i
�t3 iE'
=; f
FS
it
sW,
�
?Qg j
�e-
E Q
jt6 p
pR4
t
At
��6c
s-
it
�-
.F
Se g
g3� f
ft�
R!s
gr
it
ea #t
P
st
_?
7:
3a
�
Eoi
1:
R`
�3' •
if
rr�j
?1.
it
F
r ?
I6
/O5
I
i
R �fR
i s�a "'11111
st
i4 S Ua
W 1;
I - p-
q�f i
�t3 iE'
=; f
FS
it
_ "cg g33rl -IR
- s- o -t
n.
ti
0
:f
W
s
sW,
�
?Qg j
�e-
E Q
jt6 p
pR4
t
gA .
.F
Se g
g3� f
ft�
R!s
;#,3�
n.
ti
0
:f
W
s
w y • •
ftp �� g
it
9=�_ s -4£ Fg ia�E t as� gY rx gf
a ;£ f� z } _
F ?RAE F' a ! i ig[s Ss a d
ag�FF 1: °� i a aS °- iR ti 1pc
��=
f s
6 j =; m; J F i? are- S ie F F
aoIV, ;� 3 �! leis f£ S- as
5' ;.a gels sa f i _ f jec € �= Fa
:s�rt cfF EFRa C ief5 C Ear a s R of
a
-
Er ?F-
r 'iii :IJ I' sa IS
c c f F k rrFF'zi its
ea ?E�iE s s cr i t e r ra °i
Fib
e
In Fa . ce-• ar #s ra ji= gis.s' &3S
M VC Fi �.T 3 i r* ec tEx
C� g El6 Y' c E I "s FF= F pli� a ;r
art? i F I I I rdc PcaiFF tar
y
w
v
w
a
in
X
Ys
TI `D
r�
F$'
s .=7•qqSCij
3Sr ge4 3 ie 3S Ri 3 e
� $
�
C �
�
. e q S#
kt;r
C.-'21
i
?
c
i
;
aSisF;
Fir -J^
#-Ts E! rAi
car f3w
t�E�E rEa aEE
ads =f " g tr
sEe E �rs iq
f a
Aare
Ipi
gc s r�
.
1 7 i Fz 3 3 S
e I
�
• e_E � e
r
s
Y ; e
s ?
F
5 f
s` E $
S
G
c
gig
CY ' ig I
•
'
F s S 5 sia e e
e
I e Y
Ig
e 4
j5
c
105
aR°re c:Fd a t "st? F� �=� .� e E��Rgv 3r � = e =- � : c c Q y °
E K
F K
�
s
w
HE
a
t
Ed
j i
h
ic� r$aI;i i
?
�
^
e
e e�
FY r
X=S es F
ti
r. • � fg
�
i
a
�c �#•
�
�
cr ; I
i I
x
a = � F.j E � � � " � F E a r � t r F s
i
F i � = a . f¢ r �c
a r
f i
a�p
�c fS
aFa
g
r
f p
pis If
EWE -
a
r
-
`@ E ■���
§! \I�|
a | \! % q 01 In 4
if
| |�
� I
■9!
!@
`�| I•�
� \
�\ \.
!
/f �
Eli ii
K 2 Ir
�
%
,
U
&
7
■
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
In re tha Application of ) Tentative Tract 13738
RODINE COMPANIES, INC.. ) SECOND— SUPPLEMENT TO APPEAL
FROM DECISION OF
PLANNING COMMISSION
Applicant. )
Applicant. Rodine Companies, Inc. respectfully supplements its
appeal from the decision of the Planning Commission to approve
the above tentative tract, subject to certain conditions, as
follows:
Currant Status of the Con lone of Aar+sal
If the current recommendations of the Planning Commission are
accepted by the City Council, the following is the position of
the Applicant with respect to the conditions of approval:
No. Condition
1 Provide Drainage Acceptance L
2 Utility Undekgrounding
(a) Sapphire Street
(b) Almond Street
3 Almond extension to west
4 Centerline Crown Section
5 Dedicate north half of Almond
6 Obtain north half of Almond
7 Emergency access road
8 Sidewalk on one side only
5 Construct Almond Intercept Ch
10 Almond lull width to Henry
Al 24 month expiration of map
A6 water quality letter
Applicant's Position
otter Agree
annel
O1 Site developm,int conditions
82 Plans and elevations approval
83 Plan approval before final map
84 No waiver of ordinances
87 Trash receptacles shielded
B1U Street name review
Disagree
Agree on south side only
Agree to removal of condition
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Agree to removal of condition
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Agree- Planning Commission has
clarified that a private sewer
system is acceptable if it meets
requirements of water quality.
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
4gree
nnt- TT 13738
Second Supplement to Appeal
January 18, 1989
Page Two
811 Building number ID
B17 Solar easements
C3 Fire retardant materials
E1 Landscape and irrigation plan
E2 Tree removal permit required
E3 Street trees
ES Trees on slepos
E9 Slope maintenance
E10 Landscape maintenance
E12 Landscape plan approval
E14 Water and energy conservation
E15 Landscape maintenance district
GI SecorJary access
G2 Access during construction
G3 water supply during construction
G4 Mall boxes
G6 Water and sever plans
H1 Comply with uniform codes
H2 Pay fees prior to permits
H4 Street addresses
I4 Location of underground utilities
J1 Grading plan
J2 Soils report
J3 Soil Discurbanre Permit required
IS Final grading plans before permit
K1 Trail and street dedications
K2 Almond Street 42 foot dedication
K4 Corner property line radius
K5 Non - vehicular access on
Almona and Sapphire
K7 Private drainage easements
K8 Existing easements on map
L1 Interior street improvements
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
An-..
Agree
Agree
Agree
3.grea
Agree
Agree
Agree
Disagree -Henry Street is
sufficient per fire district
requirement Conaition should
be removed.
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree- Planning Commission has
clarified that a private sewer
system is acceptable if it meets
requirement3 of water quality.
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree, where Applicant has
agreed to underground
utilitios
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree to dedicate portion on
Applicant's property only
Agree
Agree to dedicate portion on
Applicant's property only
Agree, deaication per ordinance
Agree
Agree, except north side of
Almond.
�,�qr .. "T"T 13 73 B
a car
F
5
Sec nd Supplement to Appeal
Page Three 1989
L2 26 foot wide pavembnt
L3 Almond and Sapphire improvement
L5 Fee payment before work
L6 Street improvements approved
L7 Parkway landscape plan
Hosting of security
LII Street improvements approved
Striping and signs
L12 Street approved
clo3ure permit required
M1 On -site drainage
M5 Accept off -site drainage
M7 Zubmit drainage study
N1 Provide utility services
N2 Relocate existing utilities
02 Annex parkways
p7 Notice re maintenance district
Agree, except south side of
Almond only where owned by
s Applicant.
Agree, except north side of
Almond and underground utilities
on east side of Sapphire Street,
or paying in -lieu fees.
Agree
Agree
Agree
ASecurigree chsngetl to
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree, except building of
Almond Intercept Channel
Agree
Agree-nchat Commission has
iea
system is acceptable a private sewer
system is s if it meats
Agree of water quality
. except to extent of
undergrounding existing
utilities along Sapphire,
or paying in -lieu tees
Agree
Agree
Its ss Resolv'd
--�_ ZbEouah Plate Cocx�sai�n
The P: anning Commission, after review agreed to remove Condition 3 and Condition 7 legal counsel
with the elimination of these has
that Condition C1 be conditions, and Applicant agrees
extension of Almon modified to make further suggests
required d Serest past the St clear no further
proposed Henry Streot is
MX' T -�3 -73a
Second Supplement to Appeal
January 16, 1989
Page three
L2 26 foot wide pavement
L3 Almond and Sapphire improvements
L4 Fee payment before work
L5 Street improvements approved
L6 Parkway landscape plan
L7 Posting of security
L10 Streec improvements approved
LIl Striping and signs approved
L12 Street closure permit required
M1 On -site drainage
MS Accept off -site drainage
M7 Submit drainage study
N1 Provide utility servicen
1:2 Relocate existing utilities
02 Annex parkways
07 Notice re maintenance district
Agree, except south side of
Almond only where owned by
Applicant.
Agree, except north side of
Almond and underground utilities
on east side of Sapphire Street,
or paying in -lieu fees.
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree if "surety" changed to
"security.`
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree, except building of
Almond Intercept Channel.
Agree
Agree - Planning Commission has
clarified that a private sewer
system is acceptable if it meets
requirements of water quality
Agree, except to extent of
undergrounding existing
utilities along Sapphire,
or paying in -lieu Peas
Agree
Agree
It=s Resolved Through P1�jjq Cosrir- on
The Planning Commission, after review with legal counsel, has
agreed to remove Condition 3 and Condition 7. Applicant agrees
with the elimination of these conditions, and further suggests
chat condition G1 be modified to make it clear no further
extension of Almond Street past the p.oposed Henry Street is
required
rrg; 77 13 ?38
.I:i
` '1Z
.F
r+
STAFF REPORT CUCAMONGA
Da February 1, 1989
Tot Mayor, Membore of the City Council, City Manager
Pro =t Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager
BY: Rathy Sorenson, Senior Recroation 6uparvi or
Subject: Staff Riportt General Facilities Reservation and
Pee Policy
0s
that ce
The park and R c in COMMi a on and Pe
council apP the General Facility Aeser
policy.
a' °k°r°1md operating
currently the Community Services Department en P
under a facilities reservation
policy written in 19in.
(attached) The pr�ark land. and tfaci policy added building
was rental. with the P eneral policy relating to
recent years, staff feels that This Policy is a cornerstone
all facilities was necessary•
for all other policies to be developed in the near future. ich
Included in the policy is the odesignation v red system tosattach
would prioritize usage ewer policies as they are developed.
fools if necassary, to
The drafted policy wes approved by the park and Recreation
Commission at their January 19, 1989 meeting.
xS:be
110
J,
The City will assess charges for special events or
private uses to recover its costs of providing
support for those activities whenever it is
possible to do so. Charges shall be stipulated
through a uniform foe schedule adopted on an annual
basis by the City Council. Events not covered by
existing tee atructurso will be reviewed by the
Director of Community Services who will establ}sh
necassary assessments and conditions f_. event
approval.
GENERAL POLICIES:
1. All applications for reservations must be on
official f -rms provided by the Community Services
Department. Groupa should be aware of the
limitations of each park or facility and are
recuired to visit the facility prior to
application.
nsaxl
SUBJECT:
General Facilities Reservation and Fee Policy
EFFECTIVE:
:OOOIX
PURPOSE:
city of Rancho Cucamonga facilities and parks have
been designed for the enjoyment and use of the
Rancho Cucamonga residents. The purpose of this
Policy is to provide a general guide to
Policies provided by the Community
Services Department on behalf of the City.
POLICY:
It is the policy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to
encourage and assist citizens in their use of
Parks, community centers and other facilities
commonly available to all persons. when a special
use by a group or individual is requested, it is
the policy of the City to encourage and assist
sponsors to conduct their event in such a way as to
ensure the opportunity for a successful event
without meaningfully obatructing non - participants'
rights to use parks, streets and other common
Public facilities.
Because of its responsibility to safeguard health
and public safety as wall ass the rights of access
to public facilities and freedon of expression of
all persons, the City may place limitations or
conditions upon the use of parks, community
centers, streets and other facilities and resources
available for common use.
The City will assess charges for special events or
private uses to recover its costs of providing
support for those activities whenever it is
possible to do so. Charges shall be stipulated
through a uniform foe schedule adopted on an annual
basis by the City Council. Events not covered by
existing tee atructurso will be reviewed by the
Director of Community Services who will establ}sh
necassary assessments and conditions f_. event
approval.
GENERAL POLICIES:
1. All applications for reservations must be on
official f -rms provided by the Community Services
Department. Groupa should be aware of the
limitations of each park or facility and are
recuired to visit the facility prior to
application.
General Reservation Policy
Page 2
2. Use of facilities will be authorized only if
they provide a positive public service and are not
in conflict with ongoing City sponsored programs or
City pulley.
3. User fees will be deposited into the Recreation
Sarvicss Enterprise Fluid, which shall defray cost
connected with facility use of the applicant.
d. The administration of recreation facility usage,
astablishmert of user fees and charges, collection
of such fees and charges will be the responsibility
of the Community Services Department.
5. The Community Services Department reserves the
right to limit the hours of use of any park or
facility in order to not adversely rffect the
adjacent residents or concurrent City programs.
6. Athletic fields =at be reserved duo to heavy
scheduling by community organizations.
7. A cleaning and damage deposit may be requlree.
The deposit may vary dependent upon the nature of
the event.
S. If a group fails to perform a clean up after
their activity the total cleaning /damage daposit
:sill be forfeited. If the facility is left in a
satisfactory condition, a refund will be issued
approximately two to four weeks after the date of
facility use.. Refunds will be mailed to the
address on receipt unless a prescbeduled agreement
has been made.
9. All groups are responsible for notifying the
Community Services Department of any change in
their use of a facility, especially cancelled
dates, as soon as possible. Failure to comply may
result in a loss of deposit. (see 07 above).
10. Any use of music or an amplification system
must comply with the City's Music and Amplification
Policy and be approved in writing by the Community
Services Department prior to the avant.
11. Permits will only be issued to persons le years
and older. The person signing the application must
be present at the event. I.D. may be required.
112,
General Reservation Policy
Page 2
12. A minimum of one chaperone may b� required for
every fifteen (15) children /youth anticipated at an
indoor event. Chaparones must be le years and
older. A list of chaperones may be requested.
13. The Department reserves the right to require a
Security Guard at an event with the cost being bore
by the applicant.
14. Any person or group causing property or
equipment damage will be required to pay for same
(based cn current coat of repair or replacement).
Until paynent in received, the City shall have the
right to cancel the group's current contract and
reject future applications.
15. No nails, staples, tacks, matellic, duct or
clear tape etc., will be permitted on the walls,
coilings, or painted surfaces of any facility
(indoor or ow- door). Haskins tape may be used but
under suporv:�sion of Community Services Staff.
Tables and chairs aro for indoor use only.
16. Groups requiring time to decorate or make other
preparation must include time on original permit.
17. No motorized vehicles, without the written
permissica of the Director of Community Services,
are allowed on any facility at any time; this
includes beverage trucks, cooling trucks, and
unloading of supplies.
18. only equipment norrally located at the
requested facility may be used by the applicant.
Ns unusual situations do occur, at the discretion
of the Director of community Services, equipment
may be transferred for an event but the applicant
will be charged for all costs. Use of any
adCitional equipment which is provided by the
applicant or requested by the Department must be
requested and approved in writing.
19. Possession or consumption of alcoholic
beverages in city recreation facilities is a
misdemeanor and in not permitted under any
condition in any cf the City's facilities or parks.
20. Smoking is not permitted in any enclosed area
or loom.
llib
General Reservation Polie.-y
Page d
21. Requests for use of pub ?ic facilities which are
not specifically aCdressod in the present facility
policy maybe approved at the discretion of the
Director of Community services.
22. Events which may draw significant attendees and
all sporting events, carnivalls, shown and rodeos
must provide a Certificate of Insurance naming the
City of Rancho Cucamonga an an additionally insured
in the amount determined by the City's Risk
Kanager. Other veaa of City facilities may require
insurance coverage, as determined by the Director
of Community Services. A Certificate of Icsuranre
shall be $1 million dollars, or more, if so
required by the City's Risk Manager.
PRIORITIES AND PEES
The following categories are established an
guidelines to determine priority usage and
attaching fees associated with use. Doers may
petition to change their priority group status on a
case by case basis. Petitions should be made in
writing to the community Services Department
Director.
Group 1 community services Department sponsored event; City
of Rancho Cucamonga oponsored and co- sponsored
events; and governmental agencise serving Rancho
Cucamonga residents.
Co- sponsorship shall be by written agreement
between the Cityy and the organization which implies
joint reeponeibllity for the planning and promotion
of an activity or avant. The City must be
identified as a co- sponsor on all promotional
material of the avant or activity. All fees
collected by the co- sponsorod activity will be
turned over to the City. Those non - profit co-
sponsored organizations which provide for the
financial support of the co- sponsored activity ma/
be permitted to retain the fees from their fund
raising activities connected with the co- sponsored
activity. In the instance where the co- sponsored
organization retains the funds, an annual financial
statement, concerning the co- sponsored event, will
be filed with the city.
114
<<S�
General
Reservation Policy
Page 5
?
Group a
Resident not -for- profit, civic, social
organizations whose management is not paid and any
organization sponsoring a public forum or
a�
candidate's night.
•��
Resident non - profit community activities arm those
i
activities which have beer. created to provide a
specific service to benefit the community.
Prograns in this category are the total
ti
rosponsibility• of tae non - profit group conducting
the program or event. Pees collected by the
resident non - profit group may remain wits. the group.
E: r
Group 3
Resident not -for profit, civic, social
'C
organizations whose management is paid.
j
�.
Resident non - profit cormunity activities are
defined as mentioned under Group 2.
Group i
Resident private party activity, resident
employee&' organizations, resident Political
ycandidate
use for fund raisereT resident college
4
organizations and committeest work parties and
social events.
Group 5
Resident commercial, business, profit - making and
religious organizations, non - resident not -for-
prof in, civic and social organizational non-
resident colleges, their organizations an
committees, non - resident private party activity,
non- residont employee's associations.
Group o
non- resident commercial, business, profit - making
and religious organizations.
<<S�
■
i
i
General Reservation Policy
Pago 6
In order to qualify as a Group 2 or 3 user, the
organization Must meet all the following criteria:
A. The organization must be registered au a
not -for- profit corporation with the State
of California, or if not ruginterad with
the State, munt have a constituticn, bylaws
or mission statement which clearly state
the obje.tives of the organization are of a
non - profit, non- coamercial nature.
B. The organization must be comprised of
volunteers, ill* of which must be Rancho
c�:camonga residents.
C. The organization must submit the following:
.Ef incorporated, submit State
Incorporation papers and bylaws., if not
incorporated, submit caastitution and
bylaws or mission statement.
A current financial statement.
- A roster of current membership for
verifying itom "B^.
D. For the organizations best interest,
please submit the following:
Roster of officers
List of authorizeu reservors for your
organization.
2. Examples of groups:
Group 1 City and Community Services Events.
Pop warnar
A. C. T.I.V.E
Group 2
Group 3
Group 0
Group 3
Y.M.C.A.
Chaffey college
Prito Lay
St. Peter & St. Paul Church
Group 5 Grace Lutheran Church of Upland
Lockheed - Ontario
kathy /POLICY /feepolicy 11�
e�
K"
Data:
To:
From:
Subject:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
tP Af
February 1, 1.989 �'
L477 '
Mayor, members of the City Council, City /(/�1/rI1ieneger
Joe Schultz, Community Services Manager
Kathy fiorennen, Senior Recreation anparvisor I
Staff Report: Sports Field and parks inclement
Heather Policy
Recommendation
The Park and Recreation COT=issian recommend that the City
Council approve the SporC,a Field and Park Inclement Heather
Policy.
Over the past year community services and Park Maintenance
have discussed ways to close down parks and fields to prevent
damage to ..he outdcor facilities. The primary focus of the
attached policy is to prevent excessive ues during bad
weather or during times when fields in particular have
etandinn venter.
Park Maintenance and community Services Staff feel confident
that the cancellation end notification section of this
Policy are efficient for their purposes.
The drafted policy was approved by the Park and Recreatioa
Commieslon at their January 19, 1989 mAeting.
KS: be
liq
I_
SUBJECT: Sports ?ields and Parka Inclement Weather Policy
EFFECTIVE: xx:mnac
PURPOSE: City Parke and Fields have been doaigned and
maintained for the onjoyaent and use of Rancho
Cucamonga residents. The purpose of this policy is
to :wide the uoe of parks and fields within the
City by implementing a procedure to prevent damage
to outdoor facilities.
POLICY: City of Rancho Cucamonga reserves the right to
cancel approved outdoor facility permits for games,
practices and other usages based on inclement
weather.
PROCEDURE: 1. community Services staff will inspect the
fields, evaluating conditions, determining
playability and review findings with City Park
Maintenance staff.
Z. Field playability will be determined by:
a). safety conditions and /or hazards that
could be detrimental to players welfare.
b). existing and forecasted weather conditions
for the day.
c). potential field damage due to play or
practice.
7. Notification by recreation and park maintenance
staff will be made to the Athletic Supervisor by
3:00 p.m. weekdays and 8:00 a.m. on weekends. If a
decision is made to cancel wookonc, morning use,
personnel will re -check the fields again prior to
noon for a determination on afternoon use.
4. Upon cancellation of field usage, staff will
attempt to contact the appropriato personnel,
league representatives, umpires, team captains or
affiliate liaisons .
S. Contact representatives are requested to call a
recorded message on Athletics office main phone
numbor 944 -6950 regarding field and light
availability after 7:00 p.m. on weekdays and 8:00
a.m. on w4takands. Field information on weekend
afternoons will be available around noon.
6. The decision to terminate games, practices or
other outdoor uses in the event of bad weather
after the specified time and /or during game or
practice will be left to the respective officials,
coaches, lnaguo representatives or users at each
site.
Ili
Inclement Weather Policy
Page 2
7. If a league representative, team caotain or
affiliate liaison has not baa•n contacted, sr.:
these is no message left regarding cancelled field
or park usage on the Athletics Office phone nossage
recorder 946 -6950, than no decision has bean made
regarding inclement weather. Players and
participants should follow their regular scheduled
times and a:)poar at the reserved location.
S. The City requests that individuals and groups
attempt to r efrain from use of heavy traffic areas
during practices, regardless of weather, to assist
in providing the best field conditions possible
(i.e. soccer goal areas, grass pitching areas).
9. Individuals or groups which do not comply with
the cancellation policy may have currant and future
field use permits cancelled.
kathy /POLICY /rainout
I ` 1
That the city Council review and approve the conceptual
design plan Lor the 6 acre neighborhood park to bu located in
the Vineyards "South" village, as rocommanded by the Park and
Recreation ccmnission with comments by the Pla:•using
Commission.
located in the Vineyards - South" village, the fifth
neighborhood pa.k to be developed by the William Lyon Company
is bsirg submitted for conceptual plan approval.
Situated on the north cant corner of Kenyan Way and Salvino,
thin 6 acre facility iw the only park in the Victoria Planned
Community thus far which is not adjacent to a school site.
Surrounding land use of the facility is single family
residential with a railroad corridor along the northern
property boundary.
Amenities within the park include a sand volleyball court, an
extensive tot lot play area, 7 basketball hardcourt
fecilitiea, an informal ballfieid with arch backstop and
soccer overlay, an exercise course, group and individual
picnicking facilitien, a restroom building and on site
parking.
110
a
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
�
STAFF REPORT
0
Dates
February 1, 1989
To:
Mayor, Membsra of City Council, Act i City
Manager
Prom:
Joe Schultz, Community Sarlices Manager
By:
Karen McGuire- Emery, Ansociata Park Pla
er
subjects
Review of the Conceptual Plan for "Victoria
Vineyards South" Park
That the city Council review and approve the conceptual
design plan Lor the 6 acre neighborhood park to bu located in
the Vineyards "South" village, as rocommanded by the Park and
Recreation ccmnission with comments by the Pla:•using
Commission.
located in the Vineyards - South" village, the fifth
neighborhood pa.k to be developed by the William Lyon Company
is bsirg submitted for conceptual plan approval.
Situated on the north cant corner of Kenyan Way and Salvino,
thin 6 acre facility iw the only park in the Victoria Planned
Community thus far which is not adjacent to a school site.
Surrounding land use of the facility is single family
residential with a railroad corridor along the northern
property boundary.
Amenities within the park include a sand volleyball court, an
extensive tot lot play area, 7 basketball hardcourt
fecilitiea, an informal ballfieid with arch backstop and
soccer overlay, an exercise course, group and individual
picnicking facilitien, a restroom building and on site
parking.
110
a
Victoria Vineyards South
Pobruary 1, 1989
Page Two
A minimum six foot block wall with dense tree planting will
be required betwecr the railroad corridor and tta park,
partially mitigating some of the inherent noise as well as
providing an access barrier. It is also anticipated that a
block wall rill separate the park from the single family
residential to the east. Aa with other park facilities
adjacent to - esidential areas, security and parking lot
lightii.7 fixtures will be used which reduce glare and
unnecessary light spill.
Ccmments racaived by staff from the Planning rommtssion
included provision for the additional hardcourt facility as
wall us a dancer planting of tree material around the play
area. Both of those comments have been reflected in the
atttched plan (Exhibit A ).
JS: KME:tp
Attachments Exhibit "A" Victoria Vineyards South
Neighborhood Park Conceptual Plen
i z!
w
ORDINANCE Nn. 390
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE, REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED
LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS
A. Recitals.
(1) California Vehicle Code Section 22357 provides that this City
Council may, by Ordinance, set prima facie speed limits upon any portion of a.iy
street not a state highway.
(1f) The City Traffic Engineer has conducted an engineering and
traffic survey, of certain streets within the City of Rancho Cucamonga which
streets as specified in Part 8 of this Ordinance.
(iii) The determinations concerning prima facie speed limits set
forth in Part B. below, are based upon the engineering and traffic survey
identified in - ection A (ii), above.
B. Ordinance.
NOR, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does
hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: Section 10 20.020 is amended to the Rancho Cucamonga City
Code to reaards and figures, as follows:
10.20.020 Decrease of State Law Maximum Seed. It is determined by
City Council— resoTut on and upon the basis of an engineering and traffic
Investigation that the speed permitted by state law is greater than is
reasonable or safe under the conditions found to exist upon such streets, and it
is declared that the prima facie speed limit shall be as set forth in this
section on those streets or parts of streets designated in this section when
signs are erected giving notice hereof:
Declared Prima Facie
Name of Street or Portion Affected Speed Limit (MPH)
1
Archibald Avenue - Banyan
to North end
50
2.
Archibald Avenue - Fourth
Street to
Banyan Street
45
3
Arrow Route - Baker to Haven
45
4
Baker Avenue - 8th Street
to Footh.11 Blvd.
35
5
Banyan Street - from Beryl
Street to
London Avenue
35
6
Canyan Street - from west
City limits to
Beryl Street
40
7
Base Line Road - Hest City
limits to Carnelian
45
B.
Base Line Road - Carnelian
to Hermosa
40
I 'b
r
y� a
Ordinance No. 390
Page 2
9.
Base Line Road - Her;sosa to Spruce
45
10.
Beryl Street - Banyan to end
45
11.
Beryl Street - 800' n/o Lemon to Banyan
40
12.
Carnelian Street - Foothill to end
45
13.
Center Avenue - Foothill Blvd, to Church St.
40
14.
Church Street - from Archibald Ave. to Elm
40
15.
Eighth Street - Grove to Haven
45
16.
Etiwanda Avenue - Foothill to fumnit
45
17
Grove Aveoue - Eighth to Foothill
40
18.
Haven Avenue - 4t;i Street to Wilson
45
19,
Hellman Avenue - Foothill to Alta Loma Dr.
35
20.
Ilellman Avenue - 500' n/o Manaanita to Valley View
40
21
Hellman Avenue - 6th to Foothill
45
22.
Hermosa Avenue - Base Line load to Wilson Ave.
45
23,
lie -oosa Avenue - Wilson to Sun Valley Dr.
40
24.
Hermosa Avenue - Eighth St. to Bast Line Rd.
45
25.
Highland Avenue - Amethyst to Hermosa
35
26.
Highland Avenue - from Hermosa Avenue to 800'
west of Haven Ave.
i5
27.
Hillside Road - Ranch Cate to Amethyst St.
35
28.
Hillside Road - Haven to Canistel Avenue
35
29.
Leann Avenue - Archibald Avenue to Haven Ave.
40
30.
Lemon Avenue - Jasper St. to Beryl St.
35
31.
Nineteenth Street - Haven to San Benito Ave.
45
32.
Ninth Street - Baker Ave. to Archibald Ave.
40
33.
Red Hill County Club Dr. - Foothill to Alta Cuesta
35
34.
Rochester Ave. - Foothill Blvd, to Base Line Rd.
50
35.
San Bernardino Road - from Vineyard Avenue to
Archibald Avenue
35
36.
Sapphire Street - Banyan to end
45
37.
Sapohire Street - 19th to Lemon
40
38
Spruce Avenve - Elm Avenue to Base Line Rd.
40
39.
Txrra Vista Parkway - Church to Be'oine
40
40
Victoria Street - Archibald Ave. to Ramona St.
35
41.
Victoria Street - Etiwanda Ave. to Ro•ite 15
40
42.
Victoria Street - Haven Ave. to Mendo:ino P1.
40
43.
Victoria Park Lane - Base Line Rd. to uay Creek Blvd.
35
44.
Victoria Windrows Loop (north 6 south)
35
45
Vineyard Avenue - Church to Base Line Rd.
40
46
Vineyard Avenue - 8th Street to Foothill Blvd.
45
47
Whittram Avenue - Etiwanda to east City limits
40
48
Wilson - Amethyst Avenue to Haven Avenue
45
49.
Wilson - Haven Ave, to 200' cast of Canistel Ave.
40
(Ord 169. Section I (part), 1982: Ord. 39, Section 5.1. 1978).
Rancho Cucamonga 5182 124
i a9
lir "f �
Ordinance No. 390
Page 3
(1) Both sixty -five (65) wiles per hour and fifty -five (65) miles per
hour are speeds which are more than are reasonable or safe;
(it) The miles per hour as stated are the prima facie speeds which
are most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and are speed
limits which ere reasonable and safe on said streets or portions thereof;
(iii) The miles per hour stated are hereby declared to be the prima
facie speed limits on said streets; and
(iv) The Traffic Engineer is authorized and directed to install
appropriate signs upon said streets giving notice of the prima facie speed limit
declared herein.
SECTION 2: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this
Ordinance and shaef—cause the same to be published as required by law.
SECTION 3: The Kyor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk
shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage
at least once in The Da 11 Re ort, a newspaper of general circulation published
in the City of Ontario, Ca ifornia, and circulated in the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, California.
� pi �
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DAX February 1, 1989
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FRIX4: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: MINOR. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 87 -71 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS. INC. -
An appeal of e on ons o prova or a yraJ ni g and
paving of approximately 12 of of land far outdoor storage
w'thln the Minimum Impact /Reavy Industrial Specific Plan
(Subarea 9), located on the south side of Jersey Boulevard
between Utica and Vincent n.enues - APN: 209 - 143 -07, 08 and
09.
I RECOMMEY.DATION: The City Council 1-� requested to confirm the
rec .on as n the level of improvements to be required of this
project Should the Council concur with the modified propo el,
the applicant should be requested to apply for a variance.
11 BACKGROUND: This is an appeal of Conditions of Approval which
woTd —eve required a full range of improvements for this Minor
Development Review At the City Council meeting of January 4,
1989, the City Council continued this item in order for the
applicant and staff to explore a more reasonable level of
improvements.
On January 6 E 24, 1989, staff met with the applicant to discuss
various improvement options As a result of these meetings, the
applicant has agreed in concept to improve a substantial portion
of the frontage, to eliminate one driveway, to relocate and
reconstruct another, and to provide a decorative screen wall,
with landscaping, behind the setback line The specific proposal
is outlined below and on Exhibit "1"
1 Driveway "A" will be removed
2 Driveway 'B" will be relocated to align with the driveway
across the street and reconstructed to City standards
3 All improvements (1 a landscaping, decorative screen wall,
street lights, sidewalk) will be constructed between the west
property line and driveway "B"
4 Driveways "I" and "2" will remain to their existing
locations
5 Driveway "2" will be signed 'Right Turn Only"
I DL (P
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MDR. 87 -71 - caveeRCIAL CARRIERS
February 1, 1989
Page 2
6. The existing parking between driveway '8" and driveway '2"
will remain.
7. Behind the parking row, between driveway "B' and driveway
i ", a 5 -foot landscape planter and decorative screen wall
will be incorporated.
II1. ANALYSIS: This proposal would result in the full development of
mpi rovements on approximately 40% of the property frontage. The
proposed decorative wall, with landscaping, would screen the
storage area from oubllc view along thA entire frontage, as
required by the Industrial Specific Plan.
In addition, one problem driveway would be eliminated, and
another relocated to a more desirable location The two easterly
driveways and the existing parking between them would remain
unchanged
The modified proposal, as presented, appears consistent with the
ingrovementsl to ai proposal substantia Prtionwofl t significant
the site, It is assumed
that any future expansion or alterations requiring permits would
trigger the requirement to bring the rest of the site up to
current development standards.
IV. CONCLUSIONS: In order to approve the modified proposal, approval
oT a var ante by the Planning Commission will be required Along
Jersey Boulevard, the Industrial Specific Plan requires a 20 -foot
parking setback and a 35 -foot minimum average landscape setback,
as measured from the face of curb (see Exhibit "2 "). The
setbacklarea would
foratheeast half of theaprojectositein within the
If the City Council concurs with this proposal, the applicant
should be directed to file for a variance
41e ly led r
ex
BB.CK:ko
Attachnents: Exhibit "I" - Improvement Options
Exhibit "2" - Setback Standards, industrial Specific
Plan
Exhibit "3" - City Council Staff Report, January 4, 1989
Resolution of Denial
� 027
IV >�
4i p'aJ
d n
p
z
a
� r
w
H
I � b
w
r
tzi
0
g� t
r�
q�
�v
4f
v�
7
i
i
i
w
f1 4
w
I i
� K
I
t�
,PCo
otl
a
t
D
f.
a
Q
SUBAREA 9 (Con.inued)
66' Right -of -Way - 7th
Vincent
Utica
and all other local streets
n r
u r..
ae n
Minimum Parcel Size
Setback Requirements
(Measured from ulti-
mate face of curb)
Twe (7) acres in the area between Arrow Hignway
extending 1000' south, five (5) acres in remaining
areas
Milliken
Arrow
Rochester
Cleveland
aw¢ Jersey
7th
8th
9th
Vincent, Utica,
and all other
local streets
Average
Landscaping
Parking
Building
45'
25'
45'
'
45'
'
'
45'
35'
20'
35'
35'
25'
15'
25'
•
25,
'
25'
25
Landscapo Requiresents 10% of the net lot area in the area between Arrow
Highway extending 1000' south
5% of the not lot area in the remaining area
M
1V -51
Fj -wrbrr 'Z'
— CITY OF RANCfiO CUCI"MONGA
STAFF REPORT
DALE: January 4, 1989
T0: Mi and Members of the City 0,.ocir
FROII: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Cynthia S. Kinser, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMINT REVIEW 87.-71 - COMMERCIAL CARRIERS IHC.
appea o ' e on nns o pprrova or the g ding
and paving of approxiw tely 12 acres oP lard fi outdoor
storage within the MLrimraa Impact /Heavy industrial
Specific Plan (Subarea 9) located on the south side- of
Jersey Boulevard between Utica and Vincent Avenue - APH:
209- 143 -7, 8 and 9.
1. RECCMMEQATION: Staff re-crxmenis that the Citt Council deny this
appea an u old the ilanning (*mmission decision. If the Council
feels that a relief from the conditions of approval may be
appropriate, the applicant shuuld be directed to apply to the
Planning Commission for a Variance.
II. MrRCUA9: At the City Councii meeting of December 7, 1988, all
o e n ormatlon regarding the background of this project was not
available. This report will u-ovide supplemental infonrrtion. The
staff report of December 7, l�gi8, with Exhibits, is als,. provided.
In early 1985, Commercial Car•iers submitted an application for a
Minor Development Review in oiler to occupy the subject site (see
Exhibit "C ") for vehicle stor•rge and distribution. At that time,
staff determined that since the applicant was propo :rin9 to occupy
the site "as 1s ", no Development Review was necessary. The
application and fee were retrnrned with the understanding that as
song as no modifications to the site occured, Development Review
would not be required. The applicant was also notified that Code
,equirments in this area prohfbft open vehicle storage within 120
feet of the street. In Febraary 11196, the applicant acknowledged
that trucks would not be par4ee or stored within 120 feet of the
property frontage (see Attactnenrt "1 ").
The Development Code requfre:r a Minor Development Review for the
"new construction, expansior, or significant reconstruction of
parking lots" and /or "the establishment and/jr construction of an
outdoor storage area on the same site as, and in conibnction with,
an existing business." Fu•ther, the In,rustrlal Specific Plan
-s11`
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
MDR 87 -71 - Commercial Carriors, Inc
January 4, 1989
Page 2
states that within the Minimum ImWct /Heavy Industrial district
'All materials, supplies, equipment and operating trucks shall be
stored within a,t enclosed building or a storage area. Such storage
areas within 120 feet of a street frontage shall be screened.
feat nofy�the est aetcafrontage, thereby arviolrtingstored he Industrial 8PPlint has
Specific Plan
In late 1986 the apIrlicant requested a permit to grade and paw: the
DevelcpmenttReviewTand the gapplicant the
wasenotifiedtof athe aneed Minor
to
suit the necessarl submit the requested plans. e inor De el%ment Revi w application requested
by the staff.
In order to work with the applicant, staff issued the grading inor
Derinft On October
elopmvent Review was 9B
to be submitted by condition
October 28. 198711(see
Attachment Applicant 1987.
itted the Minor Development
Review application on November
Upon review, the application was found to be deficient in several
development standards. The applicant was advised to revise his for
plans
eview In February d1908 the apslicantd resubmitted �revisede Plans
which were found to be incomplete. Staff again advised the
applicant to revise and re,.bmit the plans. In June 1988 the
applicant. submitted revised plans which were found to be once agalr
deficient. At this point, it became apparent. to staff that the
applicant: was not willing to submit plans consistent with the code
requirements. In order to resolve the issue, rather than denying
the application, approval was granted in July 1988, subject to
conditions that would bring the site into conformance with the
development standards. These are the conditions that are being
appealed to the City Council
III AoLs-fTfF paving, thereforeptrlggerin9 themrequinement forata
Minor Development Review. One of the findings for a Minor
Devclopneot Review requires that 'the proposed project is in
compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the
theelprojectCothat ouldybring Lthe snonfconfonming csite irons to
conformance with City Standards.
On October 26, 1988 the Planning Commission heard the applicant's
appeal request and determined that the propo!ed project did uequire
a Miner Development Review.
l3A
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REFORT
MDR 87 -71 - Cmatercial Carrrers, Inc.
January 4, 1589
Page 3
Further, the Commission found the Planning Dlvisiou conditions
should be reta'ned and that the Engineering Division conditions
should be modified in regards to the number of driveways permitted
on the site. The Commission therefore approved Minor Development
Review 87 -71 subject to wtifled conditions (see Exhibit A ").
thereby denying the ap;eal request.
IV CONCLUSIONS AND OPTIONS: At issua here is whether or not the "oil
chi p coo cons. to es paving, thereby triggering the requirement
for a 41 nor Development Review. If the Council determines that it
does not, the applicestion and associated conditions of approval
should be voided. However, the applicant would still have an
obligation to comply with the open storage provisions of the Code,
and would be required to discontinue open space storage within 120
feet of the public straet.
If the Council concurs with the staff and Planning Commission
determination that the site improvements do constitute paving,
:hereby supporting the need for a Minor Development Peview, the
Code provisions clearly stipulate that the site must meet all
applicable standards. The City Attorney has deteralned that any
deviation from these standards would require approval of a Variance
by the Planning Commission.
The following options are available at this point:
1 Determine that the improvements DO NOT constitute paving,
thereby invalidating the Minor Development Review.
2. Determine that the improvements DO constitute paving, and
uphold the City Planner and Planning Conmission actions.
3. Determine that the improvement, 00 constitute paving, but
instruct the applicant to file for a Variance for relief from
specific rode requirem,ints.
Staff needs appropriate dirtction as to these or other options.
Re wily s d
BBu r�
ty P n
88:CK:vc 13-9-
SI
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
M 87 -71 - Couaercfal Carriers, Inc.
Jsnuary 4, 1989
Page 4
Attachment
01"
- Letter from Ppplfcant, February 7, 3986
Attachment
02"
- Letter to App :rant, October 14, 1987
Attachment
43"
- City Council Stiff Report, December 7, 1988
Exhibit
'A"
- Resolution of A prcval with Conditions
Exhibit
"R"
- Letter from Applicant, November 4, 1988
Exhibit
J`
- Site Plan
Exhibit
"D"
- Driveway Locations
Exhibit
'E"
- Planning Comission Staff Report, October 26, 1988
Exhibit
"F"
- Planning Coaaaission Minutes, October 26, 1988
Exhibit
'G"
- Planning Commission Staff Report, September 14, 1988
Exhibit
"H'
- Planning Comfssion Minutes, September 14, 1988
133
I
RESOLUTION N0. SW-700
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL JF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL OF MINOR
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 87 -71 LOCATED AT 10807 JERSEY
BOULEVARD IN THE MINIMUM IMPACT HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
(SUBAREA 9) OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAIT, All) MINING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
(1) Commercial Carriers, Inc. has filed an application for the
approval of Minor Development Review No. 87 -71 as described in the title of
this Resolution. Hereinafter In this Resolution, the subject Development
Review request is referred to as 'the application%
(11) On July 7, 1988, the City Planner of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga approved the application, by letter, subject to specified
conditions.
(ii9) The City Planner's decision was timely appealed to the
Planning Commission on July 18, 1988.
(1v) On the 14th of September, 1988, and continued to October 26,
1988, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a
meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date adopting
Resolution 88 -224 approving the application with modtffed conditions.
(v) The Planning Commission's decision was timely appealed to the
City Council on November 4, 1988.
(vi) On the 7th of December, 1960 and continued to January 4 and
18, 1989 and February 1, 19d9, the City Council of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on
that date.
(vii) All legal prerequisites to Ltip adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
D Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it 1s hereby found, determined and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at follows:
1 This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A. ,if this Resolution are true and correct.
131
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUFIOB do.
MDR 87 -71 - COMERCIAL CARRIERS, INC.
February 1, 1989
Page 2
Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
•he above- referenced meeting of FeLruary 1, 1909, including written and oral
staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:
W the application applies to property located at 10807
Jersey Boulevard with a street frontage of 814 feet and an average lot depth
of G73 feet and is presently improved with an office, warehouse, and parking
lot; and
(b) The property to the north of the subject site is a multi -
tenant industrial park, the property to the south of that site consists of a
warehouse, the property to the east is vacant, and the property to the west is
d warehouse.
(c) The application applies to a site that is currently
improved wltn an office building, warehouse building and parking lot and is
considered a legal non - conforming lot; and
(c') Hmiclpal Code Section 11.06.02u.8 authorizes the City
Planner to impose reasonable conditions upon a Minor Development Review Permit
approval, including requirements for tandscapirg, street improvements,
regulation of vehicular ingress, eeg9ress and traffic circulation, establishment
of development schedules or time ifarIts for performance or completion.
(e) Municipal Code Section 17.06.020.A states that the purpose
and Intent of the Minor Development Review permit process is to assure that
such limited projects comply with all applicable City Standards and
Ordinances.
(f) The site plan submitted in conjunction with the
application, does not meet tht Industrial Specific Plan standard of a 35 -foot
average landscape setback and minliaun 25 -foot parking setback, as measured
from the ultimate face of curb. Further, the site plan and existing chain
link fence improvements do not net the Industrial Specific Plan standards for
screening outdoor storage of vehicles within 120 feet of a street frontage
with masonry, concrete or other similar materials.
(g) The site currently is improved with four driveways within
820 feet of street frontage The City's access policy for arterial streets
specifies that driveways on the same side of a street be spaced 300 feet
apart. Therefore, only two driveways would be allowed on this site. Further,
driveways should align with driveways on the opposite side of the street or by
off - setting a safe distance to avoid conflicting left -turn movements. The
City's access policy also requires the access be located a minimum 100 feet
from intersections.
(h) The applicant has not filed any application for variance
from the Industrial Specific Plan Standards and requirements.
I 3
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No.
Mebruary
Fll, CgOg9 RCIRL CARRIERS, INC.
Page 7
I. during the above-referenced emeetl evidence
specific findings of facts
set fort} in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes
as follows:
(a) That the proposed project is not consistent with the
otJectives of the General Plan; and
(b) That the proposed use is not in accord with the objectives
of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the district in which th,
site is located; and
(c) That the proposed use 1s not in compliance with each of
the applicable provisions of the Lidustrial Specific Plan; and
applicable thereto, wwiill beedetrimentalsto thea public i ealth,csafety,hor
welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
4. Based upon thP findings and conclusions set forth to paragraphs
1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby denies the appeal.
5. The Secretary to this Council shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
13(0
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: February 1, 1989
T0: City Council and Acting City Manager
FR3M: Russell H. Maguire, City Engineer
BY: Walt Stickney. Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: To approve and adopt the Etlwanda /San Sevaine Area Master
Plan of Drainage Report
RE TiON:
It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached resolution
adopting thr 'Etiwanda /San Sevaine Area lMaster Plan
t nta Drainage Report" to
DdGated February 1989, prepared by
EtiwandaeAreagDror a alloy 989, o introduce an ordinance amending the
Background /Analysts
The Etlwanda /San Sevaine Area (that area of Rancho Cucaonga and its
Sphere of Influence which drains to Etiwanda Creek and San Sevaine Creek)
has been recognized as being unable to suppport development without
adequate drainage facilities. on Novamber 7, 1984, the City Council
imposed a moratorium n building in the Epptlwanda Specific Plan Area for a
andiadmaster four
planofor storm ldrainage, hearesult of we review produced
the DevelopmentiPolicies," adopted abya the City Specific Drainage
Co Council on March 20. 1985
(Resolution No. 8S -130).
To better define the problems associated with development in the
Etlwanda /San Sevaine Area, the City contracted with BSI Consultants,
(civil engineers), to prepare a more comprehensive master plan of
drainage report. The final report establishes a more detailed analysis
of Report' ETheaB S/ I. nMasteriPlanarepurthalsodad &esses previous *Interim
issueswhichwere
not a part of the Interim Report, including financing mechanisms for
regional facilities and the identification of interim facilities to
accomodate development in the area prior to the total construction of the
ultimate drainage facilities.
The 8 S.I. Master facilities. Regional Pfacilitiestinclude iRegional uMainline and Secondary
137
STAFF REPORT
FEBRUARY 1, 1989
ETIWANDA /SAN SEVAINE AREA
MASTER PLAN OF DRAINRr,E REPORT
Regional, systems owned and maintained by
District. Those regional facilities include
basins, and other drainage devices used to
stc:mwster runoff. The third type of fact
maintained Master Plan storm drains, primari'
which meet a specific criteria of oize and i
Plan' report addresses the establishment of
support the financing of all Regional
facilities. Construction of drainage facili
the same way as the City's current ppolic
facility eligible for construction fundim
facilities.
the County Flood control
pen channels, dams, debris
irry very larga volumes of
Ity is the city owned and
those underground systems
ibutary area. The Master
drainage fee structure to
nd Master Plan drainage
les would function in Ouch
!s, howevtr, the type of
would include regional
The fourth type of facilities ere local storm drains. These are
facilities which are installed at the developers exps:nse as opposed to
the first three drainage types and typically .ire used to convey local
runoff from a particular development. The Master Plan Report estimates
the costs of construction of the first three drainage types, determines
their areas of benefit, and recommends drainage fees needed to support
the cost of installing tnose facilities.
Tee Master Plan Report also identifies an option where developers masy
cumstruct Interim Drainage Facilities to allow development projects prior
to completion of the entire regional and Master Plan systems. The
Interim Facilities plan will allow development of properties that r y
otherwise be financially unable to develop.
Respec u submitted,
A r
RNM:WS:dlw
Attachment
l3�
iL
:Rr�rr
!�Y
RESOLUTION NO. O l - Oq q
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
cUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ADOPTING THE ETINANOA /SAN SEYAINE
i ARSLSTER ERE KPORT PREPARED BY B.S.I.
CONSULTANTS DA D FEBRUARY
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of adequate Cflood co trot a des
! that the public, health and safety requires that adequate flood control and
drainage facilities accMany additional land developwnt'. and et4y
NHEREf�S, to adequately provide guidance to developers and prop
t owners, in the S. to adequate Sevatna drainage area 1t is deslrabte to estiblls
a a Master P1 an of Draina3e
J
yON, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF TAS CITY OF RANCHO CU Plan of f Master
a" ne ' HEREBY RESOLY °S, and adopts the "Etlwanda /San SevdatedAFebruary 1989,
Orafne9e RePO "t" prepared by B.S.I. Consultants,
1 30i
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ESTAFF REPORT
r
DATE: February 1, 198n
TO: VAyor and Members of the City Council
FRNM. Brad Buyer, City Planner
BY: Otto Kr, util, Deputy City Planner
SUOJECT: GROWTH t1ANAGEMENT
I RECOKMENUTION: Staff recommends that the Council set a date for
a special worct-shop to discuss matters related to the management
of gru+tt
li. O 1 At the l meeting. Council briefly
—e— arssbad Growth M n ge en Plan. a well as our City's
a proact to qrowth mar.agement. Staff was instructed to review
t�e Carlsbad plan and prepare a presentation for the City Council
to allt.i for a
relater issues as heyimayi review
applytotheaCityiofuRancho Cucamenge
He hat_ since had the opportunity to review the Carlsbad program
in gr ater depth We have also met with one of the consultants
instrumental in the preparation of rte Carlsbad plan, and itarned
a greet deal about the Carlsbad process
Manaling growth is by nature ar all - inclusive suhje,'.. A
sutt.ssful program must address the relationships among all of
the tom lex elements tofa the effecting growth
suggest that Because a special
wor.shop be fully devoted to the discussion of growth related
is,jes soaotiime after February 20.
It would be staff's invention to present an overview of the
Carlsbad Growth Management Plan, to review our own process, to
h ghlight the status of some of our key programs, and to provide
a opportunity to discuss areas of special concern to the City
t3uncll Rey staff members representing Planning, Engineering,
ubliL Works, Community Services, and Administration would be
,vailable at the works, to ansver the Council's questions.
Resy� wily led,
o o
tl1 ��d� 3 e
Cit�T P nner
BB:Ct ko
r-
ME
70:
FFLH:
,Cuwc t:
CPPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
br XWVY 1, 1489
Mayor and City C ==i.l
Donna A. Wker, Pdministrativo A,'tslstant'i11i
Pr3 0 a it autharimtial the City has jointed tha California Cwtrant Cities
AtJ' XAi tier, and now that the City +a a azmher, a voting dalegate and altmmste
delegate are noadod. A^ Per the laagin o[ California :Sties tin City Caaxll
notds to eeleat eme wtin9 mwte°•
141
.7.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA
STAFF REPORT
February 1, 1989
Ctycw It
o�
n
C
a
TO, Alayor, Alembers of the City Council, Acting City Manager
FRO11, Jerry R. Grant, Building Official
SUBJECT, DUST )ONIC(LM1IIN DEVELOPMTNT AREAS - REQUEST FOR REPORT
Filam O
I o�' a� a genera if polity limiting thoaoxt sntCotylndlvldual
dl s turbed aolta areas, resulting from development
activities, to ti.ose cress for which It has noen v e-1f1-
that reasonable measures will oe avalleble f�em'haslz ng
implementation of duet control end, further, P
that proactivo control measures be given first conslderatlon
for issuance or city and county permits
it BACKGROUND, on January 18 the City Counc!) requested a
report concerning reeonmendatlens for reduction of dust
gon ore!lon sudl, ae occurred In recent windstorm. The
purpose of this report la to provide that information and
solicit ratltl_ all on and suutllliodeDYtt heCBulidingc and
poll olos tentative l; being
Fafely PIvislon.
Ili ANALYSIS, Looking back over the negative dust episodes of
the past
two seasons, without exception, every significant
problem developed hecause the systems approved [or achieving
control were net In place or were not functional at the time
of Impact. In the majority of the ��caljonsott water tfrom
d
C ontrol n:ncha,.i sm was to buirements for water application
trucks or sprinklers Requirements
have been and still are the mainstay control for the County
Agricultural Conmissloner's offloo. We eq believe tale
reliance has several drawbacks, 1) It requires manpow rr end
equipment, proportionate to the sizer fthotproject, bundec
avallable and operative over long In a ^. t,vc construction
adverse operational conditicns
periods, water application equlpmontvis Invalicatton. 3 )tad
to other locations resulting in dtionspwllh each
Water control requires repeat applies
14 �—
Staff Report, Duet Control In Development Areas
February 1, 9e0
Page 2
Incident, further incroaartng the potential for negllgen.
4) Particularly or, InrQe projects, adequate coverage -a.,not
be aehlrived because water supplies are not available In
large quantities
The Building and Safety Division Is of the opinion that a
greater measure of control can be schleved If we can achieve
departure trom what appoa :s to be a traditlonol approach and
require utlllzstion of more eroocttve controls measures as
conditional to Issuance of porsits. By concentrating on the
use of m•laties, so 11 stabilizers, wading, etc., that do not
depend upon Immediate response of manpower and equipment for
effectiveness, we should gradually recover the ability to
control. Water usage will continue to be necessary during
actual construction activity, but prompt application cf more
permanent controls should be the final stop In the process,
particularly where sites are to be left dormant for extended
periods of time. The William Lyon Co. has adopted this
method w:tich rerlected significant suceoss In the Irst
storms.
A second emphasis that will help edjust response
capabilities Is an insistence upon reasonable evidence of
the developer's ability to achieve :ontrol prior to ise%ance
of dust control permits The Tarr a Vista Development had
two active soils disturbance permits from the County
aggregating over JJO acres in tnis past windstorm. That
amount of acreage would roqulre equipment with a capacity of
at least 900,000 gallons (approximately 200 trucks) wo.•ktng
continuously In order to prov.de relative safety
SUNMARYt We believe a greater measure of dust control during
development can be achl axed through more emphasis on the use of
at arnates to writer ypplicatlon, because of their proactivo
nature and ratigbllity. Secondly we believe that greater
attention should be given to the developers ability to achievy
the control nechanlsma proposes conditional to permit Issuance.
The Building and Safety Division and the Grading Comnittec has
invoked similar requirements at time of grading permit Issuance
on a cave by case basis, but not as consistent policy. Lacking
direction to the contrary, we will initiate both avenues as a
143
Staff Report: Dust Control In Development
p pment Areas
February 1, 1589
Page 3
regular pert of the grading permit process. We request that the
Council strongly encourage exploration of these courses with the
County Agricultural Comrlsslon as well in to Issuance of soil
disturbance permits for projects In Reneho Cucamonga.
Res
pectfully s
ubmitted,
er r R a/ l g
Official
JRG:LL
.e
— CITY OF RADICHO CUCAM6GA
-STAFF REPORT
DATE: February ry 1, 1989
ID: Hayor and City 0nu1aL
Flaf: Wane A. Baker, Administrative AssinYdntiti'�
SUiJECf: Cllr OAOp I�cTe�v,
flvl'
I°
r9n I
As directed at thr City Crrucil r eetilg of Ja-urary 18, 1989, st:tf has t=ined
the possibility of completely grading or disking the labor camp site on Arrow
Highway. Staff has met with the owner of the property in regards to this issue
and he has sated very recrptive to the idea.
After meeting with the owner of the labor reap gruperty, a furtier meeting has
been arratgod with tbo o nrra, rrgin car, and a 3dtect for ttz site to a1scum;
in dotiil exictly %hat the City would require. When this meeting omav, staff
will have a rlear indiratiao of when and how this cperaticn can take place.
Staff will continue to koep the City Council informed on this issue as it
develops
14-5
w
i.
Am
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � 04kb
STAFF REPORT MC6
c
8
I
D ATE:
February 1, 1989
Members of the City Council
TO
Mayor and
d Buller, City Planner
Brad
Bra
FROM:
FROM
Oan Coleman. $enfJY
BY:
AILS
LOMA CHANNEL RECREATIONAL TRAILS
SUBJECT:
ALTA
I ABSTRACT: Th15 report Presents the status of `taff's efforts t°
the County �0 °hts rights-of-way. District The City
nego a ' nn agreement with art of
trail use along flood control nlyhforeOemens Channel and D
currently has an a9re°nt
Cucamonga Creek a concept for
Division staff has had discussions with en
regarding Recreational
II. STATUS: The Planning •and equestrian
er, FloodaC�e �tDforri�creatical� purpose,
of strian
a point -use include bikinc, hiking, Jo97ine City
use would ff'
sta
trails. Essentially - st6 F
Cucamonga and the
master agreeeme , that whichl it S.
,,,mining k, Deer Creek. Hillside
1 exist for includi
posed -a
nthelright Loot use ter
all of the
Alta Loma Channel, Cucamonga
and Day Creek. Oppartu ^1ks
Sevaine influent:• Creeks
may a S0 rimarilY w ^•••° our 5V on
which are located P County Flood Control District
with the the agreement. Once the
Staff is meeting of and City
February 1 to outline the specifics City Council for
agreement has been draftedbeopresenteditoti the ervtsorsymust give
staff, the dM tails will Coard of Sup
royal Ultimately, the County
appal aDProvaI of the agreement.
BACKGROUND: The City's Matter plan of Trails f regional d trails
[Il D,�Tpran establishes a backbone odes access to ree9^aspacess. In
ones stem D other open based
This regional trailzcenic canyons and a City
national forest, v the County Flood Control
identifying the locaroi °ra of eivedib t trails. existing or
its District to an a P 9
road area along
prop sed floodtchannels.e service
A
CITY CouNCII siAFF.REPou" -.
ALTA LOMA CHANNEL RECREATIONAL TRAILS
February 1,'1989
Page 2
IY. SUK.=Y: Staff will contfaue to keep the Council updated on the
s us of negotiations with the County on regional trails.
)GRe ty 't e
o8:OC:ko
14?
:j
Crry OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c ^�
MEMORANDUM
¢ L
4 J
O n
GATE: January 27, 1989 z
,
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Councl in i
FROM: Russell H. Maguire, City Enginee
SUBJECT: Etiwanoa / San Sevaine Area Nasser Plan of Drainage Report
Attached is the body of the Etiwanda / San Sevaine Area Master Plan of
Drainage Report which will be presented to the Council for its approval
on February 1.
The report addresses drainage requirements in the Etiwanda and San
Sevaine areas including needed facilities and funding mechanisms to
obta.n those facilities. ,
The Appendix presentation included it will be
a part of the for Council approval The Appendix consists
mainly of Calculations and other back -up naterial to tlw report.
if you have arLw questions, please call me or Walt Stickney, Associate
Civil Engineer, at 989 -1862 (x 3CS)
RRM:Ws:sjm
Attachments