No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/01/16 - Agenda Packet1 ,ridl :.�itj�yh f i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR NERMG9 I stand 3rd Wednesdays - 7 :00 p.m. January 16, 1991 Civic Cunter Council Chambers 10500 Civic Cantor Drive Ihmcho Cucamonga, California 91730 ♦a� City Councilmembors Dennis L. Stout, Mayor William J. Alexander, Mayor o-Tem Charles J. Huqust, Coundlmember Diane Williams, Coundimember Pamols J. Wright, Counellmember Re• Jack Lam, City Mancgtr James L. Markman, CltyAttomey Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City 0mcn: 989.1851 6' city council Agenda January 16, 1991 1 All it"s Submitted for the City Council ageuda "at be 10 writing. The deadline for submitting these 'toe 12 Stoo pin. on the Wednesday prior to the "sting. The City Clare's office receives all such Stases. Ear, 'r0 0[D[A I poll calls Buquet —, Alsander _, Stout —1 Williams __, and Wright . E A MOgW020fBZILUKUMUM 1 Participant° for PTh irrCCtommunity Serv�lcs Efforts' and 2. presentation to the Etiwanda high School football Teo for their accomplishment in winning the 1190 C.I.y. blvision 7 Championship Title. 1 serviceman Chairman on proclamation ! his Public Safety commission. L• `nNE f7lOM 'AE yUC2O Tu, is the tins and place for the general public to address the City Council. state law probfbits the City Council from addressing any faun not previously included on the Agenda. The City cc'acil aq receive te►tiaony and set the matter for ■ subanqueo< usetisg. Coamants as to be limited to five minute per individual. D cops Wx CALU M The followiM Consent Calendar !tees are expected to be routine and non.- toutrovenial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discueeicn. Any item way be .eovsd by a couseilmaaber or maeber of the audience for discussion. 1. Approval of Winubn D c °saber 19, 1990. 2 Approval of Warrants, Eegietar Nos. 1/2/91 and 1/9/911 and Payroll ending 1/3/91 for the total amount of 51,042,:71.87. 1 1 i. City Cou,.cil agenda January 16, 1991 ----- 1 App - oval to receive 1990- file currenc InvHtmunt Schedule 14 and q, Alcoholic eovora9� as of December 31. Nine OTar'an Nnol:, SBSo Archibald Market. Applies for Neighborhood 16 S. Alcoholic Sm" Avenue, Suite A. lleaelon for on Sale General place 1990 Priority 16 for Zsndej+s Mexican Ira oo APD Eating Maria D• Chaves, RAf"l Chavoc. Bra�da A. iendelas, Iaria and Aau1 Zendeyae. zondeursne. 791, Vf.rtvyard yendel °e. Jose L. Martin Zsndejas, and dlnfa fan'leiae, 18 Avenue, /D -7 to Landscape to order the ArmesaCion located on the 6 Approval BB -16, MA intense" District No. 7 for DR Grlgham and Partners• south olds Of Arrov Route and vest of Milliken Avenue. 19 submitted tY O'Donnell. Armstrong. RESoLul LON No. 91 -013 CITY A RESOLUTION Of THE CITY COUNCIL OP ORLDZRING Oy pANCRO CUCAMONGA, CA1,IypiUTER TTORY TO •fig ANNSEATION OY CERTAIN T 3 p0A OR LANDRCAPE MATNTENafICE OISTRICS NO BB -36 22 I Approval to accept • A°s1 property Improve"h V Contract and Llen Agreent from Lastlo me and Erzoebee Vus for o located at 6009 Uellm►n Avenuo 26 single family nddencs, RESOLUTION N0. 91-014 , THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY A RE60LOTION O OT RANCHO CUCAMCNOA. CALIPJRNIA. ACCT ND A RZ&L PAOPERTY INFROVZNENT ND ZRZS AND LIEN AGAEZMZNT PROM LA"LO aND SAZ9ECITY VASS AND AUTHORIZING TIE MAYOR AND CITT CLING TO SIGN THZ SANE 27 B. nt (CO 91 -"Le Vfor the plood Control Dior Roa for O °Y Approval to esseuta en a9r+ Base DI Road to I -15, San BernaMino County rovemOnta from other Ccaak Phase 3B Krm/ Route, and beLefund of San lust south oL to be funds with the related Day Creek Fieond control District tion Bernardino County the Butenu of Raelegional ramnLninq 56.4 111lion podwlopment Agency loon Lund: and CStY T',d 11 not Cu emceed 63.0 mL11Lon 1,rilltles . city Council Agenda January 1E, 1991 9 approval to execute Cooperative Agresmant No. 3 -719 (DO 91 -003) with Caltrans for the improvement of 19th Street from Carnelian street to Amethyst Street. A refundable deposit of 630,000 OU W01 be required, to to funded from Capital Improvement• Account No. 22 -,337 -8745. RESOLUTION NO. 91 -015 A RESOLUTION OF Tdx CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COOPERATIVE AORSEHQNT NO. 8 -719 WITH THB STATE OF W-1 IFCANIA DEPARTHENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR TM INPROVENENT OF 19TH 57RECT FROM CARNSLIAH STREET TO AMETHYST STREET AND AUTHORISING T11Y SIGNING THEREOF BY TIM MAYOR 10. Approval to execute Improvement Agrneswnt Extension for Tract 13A53 located on the northeast corner of Wilson Avenue and Caniatel Avunuo submitted by Pacific International Development, RESOLUTION NO. 91-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITT COUNCIL OF THE CITy OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVINO IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPAOV30MHff SECURl'i FOR TRACT 13851 11. Approval to accept Improvemaots, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for DR 07 -19 and DR 87 -20, located on the northeast corner of 6th Strut a,ui Hermosa Avenue. Roleese DR 87 -19, Faithful Performance Bond (Street) =1000,00 Release DR 87 -20, Faithful Performance Band (Street) 6 6,600.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91 -017 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CGCAMOHOA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 87 -19 AND DR 87 -20 AND AUTHORISING T303 71LINO OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION YOR THE W0.RX 28 29 30 32 33 34 =v4 .. 1 W 110111, City Council Agenda January 16, 1991 4 17 sroroval to accept Improvements, Release of Maintenance I 36 antes Bond for Tract 13077 located on the southwet of Etiwanda Avenue and Highland Avante. Releases Maintenance Guarantor Bond (Street) S 93,700.00 13. Approval to accept Improveownte, Release of Maintenance 36 Guarantee Bond for Tract 13057 leeatod on the north aide of Base Line Road between Btiwanda Avenue and Victoria Park Lane. Rolease Maintenanco Guarantee Bonds fors Base Line Improvements S 9,500.00 Off -Bite 5 19,700.00 On -SLts $101,700.00 14 Approval to accept Improvements, of Maintenance 37 Guarantee Bond for Tract 13475 local•' on the northeast corner of Ramona Avenue and Church St.vet. Releaser Maintenance Guaranteo Bond (Street) $ 47,000.00 L C011 /pr 0RD710•IIC// The following Ordinances )gave bad Public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are aspected to be routine mod non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clark will read the title. Any iten can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. P. ADVIATIM PUBLIC ZZUTNON The following itess have been advertised sod /or posted as public hearings ae required by law. She Chair will open the seating to reeviva public testircny. 1. COVOIDP.RATION M AMEND BrCTION A.17.780 OF CHAFTBA 0.17 38 AND SECTION A. 19, TAO OF CHAPTIR 11.19. BOTH OF TITLE 8 OP THE RANCHO CUCANONOA MVMXCIPAL OODE. ADDING PROVISIONS 1 .l J :'•t i i t i i • 1 PAN w' City GunoGl Agenda tt January 16, 1973 S V, OADIXANCi NO. 438 (first reading) 39 AN OADINANCi OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGNOxOAr CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION S. 17.230 0I GI1iP1'iR 8.17 AND SECTION 9 19.380 Ol CHAPTER 8.19, BOTH 07 SITES B OF 21iE RANCHO COCA)IONOA MUNICIPAL CODE, ADDIXO PROVS6ION9 ACQDIRIRO PAYMENT FOR REFUSE COLLICTION BIRVICtB 2. (.Oj{$jpLAATLON O► AN ADPIAL OF VE9SI6O TINTATIVC ^. MCT 42 1 {6]0 - LINCOLN PROPERTY CDIAANY - M appeal Of the Planning Co¢mlasloG'• dwlaicn denying the residential subdivision and design review at 328 wndominluID unite on 20.15 acres of land In the Madlua (8 -I{ dwelling units per acre) and Nadlun -High (1 4-24 dwelling units per acre) Ruldantlal districts in the Victoria Planned COa®unity, located on the northeast corner of eua Line Road and NS111ken Avenue - APN 337- 691 -01. 3E60LUlION NO. 91 -010 96 A NiSULUTIOIi Of THE CITY COONCIL O! THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING V66fIN0 TZNTATSVi TRACT MAP NO. 1 4330 FOR TtIE DEVEIgPlOINT Or 323 CONDOMIXIOM UNITS Oil 20.13 ACRES OF LAND IN TIM 1QOIVN (8 -1{ DNELLINO UNIT! PER ACRE) AND NEDIUN -AION AE9IDENTIAL DIB1'RICT (1 4-24 DNRLLINO UNITB PER ACRE), NISHIN SHi VICSDRIA PLANNED COMNUNITYr LOCATED ON THE NOAYNSAST CORNER OF BASS LItR ROAD AND MILLIREN AVENUE AND MATING lINDIN09 IN SUPPORT 17IERE0J - APN 227- 691 -01 ..' RESOLOSION NO. 91 -039 100 A AESOLOTIOH C1 THE CITY COOIICIL OT SHE CITY Of RANCHO COCAMONOAr CALIFORNIA, DENYING 1718 OSSION REVIEW ►OR VESTIRO TENSATIVE TRACT NO. 1 {6]0r THE DEVELOPHERT or 320 CONDOM2NIUM UNITB ON 20.14 ACRES OT LAND IN THE NEDIVK (8-3{ DN6ISING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MEDIUM -ASCN AESIOENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DHLLLINO UNITB PER ACRi), MISAIH THE VICTORIA PLAN9ED COJDNNITYr [ACTED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNEA OF BASE LINT ROAD AND NILLIREN AVENUE, AND MARIMG ►INDINOS IN CUPPOAT iFfEALO! - APR 217 - 691 -01 PAN w' City GunoGl Agenda tt January 16, 1973 S V, OADIXANCi NO. 438 (first reading) 39 AN OADINANCi OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUGNOxOAr CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION S. 17.230 0I GI1iP1'iR 8.17 AND SECTION 9 19.380 Ol CHAPTER 8.19, BOTH 07 SITES B OF 21iE RANCHO COCA)IONOA MUNICIPAL CODE, ADDIXO PROVS6ION9 ACQDIRIRO PAYMENT FOR REFUSE COLLICTION BIRVICtB 2. (.Oj{$jpLAATLON O► AN ADPIAL OF VE9SI6O TINTATIVC ^. MCT 42 1 {6]0 - LINCOLN PROPERTY CDIAANY - M appeal Of the Planning Co¢mlasloG'• dwlaicn denying the residential subdivision and design review at 328 wndominluID unite on 20.15 acres of land In the Madlua (8 -I{ dwelling units per acre) and Nadlun -High (1 4-24 dwelling units per acre) Ruldantlal districts in the Victoria Planned COa®unity, located on the northeast corner of eua Line Road and NS111ken Avenue - APN 337- 691 -01. 3E60LUlION NO. 91 -010 96 A NiSULUTIOIi Of THE CITY COONCIL O! THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING V66fIN0 TZNTATSVi TRACT MAP NO. 1 4330 FOR TtIE DEVEIgPlOINT Or 323 CONDOMIXIOM UNITS Oil 20.13 ACRES OF LAND IN TIM 1QOIVN (8 -1{ DNELLINO UNIT! PER ACRE) AND NEDIUN -AION AE9IDENTIAL DIB1'RICT (1 4-24 DNRLLINO UNITB PER ACRE), NISHIN SHi VICSDRIA PLANNED COMNUNITYr LOCATED ON THE NOAYNSAST CORNER OF BASS LItR ROAD AND MILLIREN AVENUE AND MATING lINDIN09 IN SUPPORT 17IERE0J - APN 227- 691 -01 ..' RESOLOSION NO. 91 -039 100 A AESOLOTIOH C1 THE CITY COOIICIL OT SHE CITY Of RANCHO COCAMONOAr CALIFORNIA, DENYING 1718 OSSION REVIEW ►OR VESTIRO TENSATIVE TRACT NO. 1 {6]0r THE DEVELOPHERT or 320 CONDOM2NIUM UNITB ON 20.14 ACRES OT LAND IN THE NEDIVK (8-3{ DN6ISING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MEDIUM -ASCN AESIOENTIAL DISTRICT (14-24 DHLLLINO UNITB PER ACRi), MISAIH THE VICTORIA PLAN9ED COJDNNITYr [ACTED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNEA OF BASE LINT ROAD AND NILLIREN AVENUE, AND MARIMG ►INDINOS IN CUPPOAT iFfEALO! - APR City Council Agenda January 16, 1991 1 6 The following item have an 109+1 publicatfoo or posting requlreaats. The Chair will open the Meting to receive Public testimur. No Itooa 6ubmltted. E. clrr cuGri •■ era The following item do act legally require any public Uetlacny, although the Chair my open the +eating for public input. 14 : 1: • �P: YI. V .,U � �•` :7:..:r VII. 'h. 11 V •+ 1 V` Y . IYY •: Y J ry J• S•L s.0 Y \. •'Y Y •MYrlr•.!'Y • M.•L1 RESOLUTION NO. 91 -010 I 122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMMc;A, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EEECUTIOM OF AN AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AOREETQNT RELATING TO THE WEST END COHKUNICATIONS FINANCING AUTHORITY YJ '.1 J• ,P •• YJ J Y •Jr ' Valk \• Yr .ry••r ry V, y .Jr Y.1. Y I I i •�a V• V.1 • • i� +1. City Council Agenda January 16, 1991 1 I MOLUTION NO. 91 -071 1 125 A RISOLUTION Of Mf CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORISING THU LIASINO OF CERTAIN CAPITAL EQUIPNEHT FRON THE HILT END COIC(UNICATIONS FINANCING AUTHORITY, AUTHORISING AND DIRECTINO EEECUTION Of A LEASE AGREYNENT AND A SUHLRA9I, APPROVING SALE OF MMS AND AN OFFICIAL STATENEAT, AND AUTHORISING OFFICIAL ACTIONS • I.YY :1 a' J. •1. •O:N The fallowing Items have been r"osted by the City Council for discussion. -bay Are not Public hearing items, although the Chair MAY oPen the meeting for public input. 1• 44I3$IQLRRT'ON OF RYCO,ORHDIO CONNIBe ION APPoINTerNT9 PoR THP. PL *WINO COMMISSION (ORAL RElOAT) . Y •r t Y. N• • I�. Y: f.' P:Y .1 M 1• r ,P hV- J J. IDEMTI►ICATION of ITFHe M This is the time for City Comeil to identify the items they with to discuss At the nest meeting. Thess items Will not be dUcusaod At this meeting, only identified for tba nest Keating. '1 ai f City Council Agenda January 10, , 1971 991 1 K. COInIDeiGMgMa 1ROY TRi ! S ibla is the ties and plane for th. general Public to address .. the City COwMall. state lau PVoMb is the City Council fr Addressing say issue nct prallously Included ou th! Agenda. The City Council may receive hstiwosy and act the matter for a subsequent meeting. Cneenuts era to be limited to file minutes per Individual. L. ADJOD MMM bC=ZNO TO ADJOURN TO JANUARY 73, 1990 RT 7100 P.M. FOR A JOINT NLATINO OF TUX CM CCUNCIL AND Tit CUCANONOA commy NATM DISTRICT AND CHINO ILA" NUNICIFAL NATU,DISTRICT, To at SID IN TU 2XI- COMMUNITIES CCNr""CH Room AT TOM CIVIC CfJRRR. 1, Debra J Adams, City Clark of the City of Rancho CucaaoWx, hereby certify that a true, accurate COPY Of the foregoing agenda was posted on January if, 1991, seventy -tea (77) hours PC'" to tun "Sting Per DOVernment Code 54953 at 10500 Civic C•:cer Drive. e .pptt . + t T' kTi A City Council Agenda PAN Denary 16, 1991 9 ADDENDUM NUMBER I TO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CONDENT CALENDAR A COWWWrr CILENDAR The following Consent Calendar itses are aryacted to be routine and non- contreveraiale They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without dlacussione Any Lima may be removed by A Councilaember ar mamber of the audience for discussion. 1. Arproval to open escrow with Gwo- Chase -Liao, at, al., for right -of -way acluieltian at Foothill and Rochester (APR 227- 021 -11 and 32). 1 October 24, 1990 CITr OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL HIHUTES Adjourned Joint Meatigtl gity Council and the Park and gureation Coarties Wn A. CALL TO OKDa7t An adjourned joint meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council end Park and Recreation Commiaslon met on Wednooday, Oatcbor 24, 1990, in the Tri- Community Ccnferenco Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center V:Lvs, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The emoting was called to at 7#10 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. stout, In -- ry of Sam Punter. Present were Councilommberst William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquat II, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Vocals L. Stout. Absent was Councilmembort Deborah H. Brown. Present were Commiosiouerst Holly ;titcholl, Leslie Riggs (arrived 7130 p.m.), and Mark Whitehead Absent was Commissioners Pon Henry. Also present "rot Jack Lam, City Managorl Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager) Jerry D. Fulwood, Deputy City Hanger) Joe Schultz, Community Services Director; Pau.a Pachon, Management Analyst II; Tarry Smith, Park Development Superintendent# LaAnn Smothers, Redevolopmant Analyst; and Jan Button, Deputy City Clerk. Joe Schultz, Community Services Director, stated the pn, -a .e I Jcntion for the library grant was duo November 23, 19900 and the final grcn• • ae February 15, 1991. He than introduced Bob Rusting, Project Coordintvr ua /e Lang and Kip Grubb of Wolff, Lang and Christopher# Jon Von Szoliski, Theater Consultant/ Marshall Brown, Interior Consultant; and Barbara Andercon, Ban Bernardino County LLbr ion. Bob sting, Pmtject Coordinator, gave an overview of the historical development Of U.., buildings, and dincuosed the layout and heights or the buildings and the impact they would have on the view or the neighborhood to th- north. .r, city Council minutes October 24, 1990 Page 2 Councirnosber euquot asked about the elevations of the baildinge. Bob Y.ueting, Project Coordinator, stated the elevation at the street woo 30 feet, the elevation of the playa wee 5o feet, wend then the mszaanine Jewel was IS fso•. above the plaza. He Stated they have designed it to nestle into the landscape me that the elevation wl:l be camcflauged. Councilmember bright asked what will be the highest Joint in the project. Bob 1`:zting, Preject Coordinator, stated the highest point will be the fly tower on top of the theater, which would be 90 fast above Milliken at tte highest point, but there will be several Wilding mamaes to front of the tower so the pervpactive w111 stop up to that lwlnt. She Council asked if the architects would proper# a site line plan, including is landscaping to the north, that would help to State the concerns regarding the view. Rip Grubb, Wolff, Lang 6 Christopher, went over the elevation models that will be presented to the Planning commission, and discussed the style of .rchit,cture that will be used on the buildings, the •Calil:ornia classical' style, and how the buildings all relate to each other in their placement. Jon Von Sreliskl, Theater Architect, presented information on the concepts of the theater, and the Interior coating design and various coating options, and reviewed the floor place for the theater. Mayor Stout stated there were three things they were looking for in thin theater, one was flexibility, another was to make aura the audience could enjoy the theater, and the third thing was to present a setting that professional theater groups would want to perform in. Jon Von SzolickL, Theater Architect, stated that is what they have otwived tor, es well an considerations for the economics of running the building, and felt there would be no problem in attracting professional touring groups. Marshall Brown, Interior consultant, presented information on the library grant Procedure, and the current priorities of the State LlDrarlan, that he will be funding headquarter facilitiee, with rho priority being cammunatlos with the highest growth rate in the last ton and the next twenty years The second and third priority would be cities with under - staffed library cervices currently, and the fifth priority would be funding libraries which are providing the highest Par capita Square foot per citizen. He stated another advantage is that the City owns the property the library in to be located on. He felt that Rancho Cucamonga was in the forefront of all of the priorities the State Librarian is looking for. Joe Schultz, Community Services Director, statal $18 million is the projected coat of the library facilities, and tho State would fund only 65% of the project, with the balance coming from fu,development fu Ida. He stated they are conwidering asking for $12 -13 million, with Council a approval, in order to be rucceeaful in receiving the grant. City Council Minutes October 40, 1990 Page 3 Council agreed with the $13 million grant request figure. Kip Grubb, Wolff, Lang a Christopher, wont over the floor plans for the libruy. He stated staff offices would >• on the lower level with access to secured parking or into the outside courtyard, the mazzanlno level would be the win entry level for thi library, with access to other levels available which could be locked off from public access to the library for after hour functions. He stated this level would contain the reference anJ adult sections, with the upper level Containing the audio - visual and children's @action. Councilwoman Wright stated .eat whon they had the committee meatinta, they had discussed having a unique atmosphure for the children. Bob Hunting, Project CcordLnator, stated the whole upper level will be dedicated to the children, so they will be as able to be as creative as they want to bat and will be starting to develop the details at this point. Councilmember Buquat felt that they would have to • all the project to the communLty, and encomia Mad matting up the model in the City Hall, Councilmomber Wright suggested having the m.xiel In the current library to gain support. Jack Lam, Laty Hanago••, stated the model would need to be top quality for thm community to understand it Joe Schultz, Coamunfty Services Director, stated that once the Planning Commission has apprived the final plans, staff will start speaking at various group meotinos in the community to promote the project. BY Jre Schultz, Comswnity Servicaa Director, stated that the current City goal is to have S &eras of parkland per 1,000 population, which should currently give team 900 acres of open spars. Ile Stated they are aggr000Lvaly pursuing open land acquisition, but felt the City's hands have been tied with the legal opinion that they cannot finaeca real estate acquisitions over tLmo, and the City attorney has stated that the only option that does exist is cash or leaso— option to acquire land. He felt if they were to take that consorvstiva approach, the land would not be available by the time the City accumulates the capital to purchase it He stated he has run into similar situations in other states, and the only option they have had van to change the legislation to allow long t, m financing for open land purchases. , Mayor Stout stated that when they ant that goal it was vary idealistic, and felt there were different ways to accomplish it other than having active parkland. f, He felt they have not opened their horizons for onough yet to start considering , those other options. He Stated one t %ing they had not considered at that time wan maintenanco tout for the various different typos of parkland. He felt they a city Council minutes October 24, 1990 rags 4 have been successful with private options, such as larger setbacks in privately ownrd residential areas. 4a etatad the City line hlmtorically gone through cycles, flret they were land bankin 11 now they arc in a devalopment eyclo, vlieh is almost done, and felt they were close to going back to land banking again. Ito did not feel the 5 .,area /1,000 population needed to be active parkland. Councilmsadeer august felt that wito that currant economy, now Would be a good time to Acquire parcels for parkland. 4e fait it was important to explore options and alternatives to the active re,.reation use park, but to .,at backslide to that they needed to go back and retrofit the park*. rcuecllmember Wright understood Mat staff wanted to provide a better way to do land banking, and Would like to give direction to proceed with changing the legislation. She stated she did not want to back away from the policy of having 5 acrA811,000 population in parkland. mayor Stout stated he was concerned that their present goal mould not be reached if they continuo doing what they are Xorantly doing. He etatad that according to the formula they should have approximately 500 acres of parkland, and if the City grown another 00,000, which is expected* then that Would be en additional 000 acres of developed parkland, ma felt that was not feasible at this point and they needed to lork at other ways of having open apace. Councrlmgmber Alexander stated that currently when residantial units go in they have them acquire certain amounts of land for parkland, but possibly they Could look at mandating that when large commercial projects "a approved, that the owner provide a certain percentage of acreage for recreation facilities for their employees, which could be eoun`ad in the invontory. Joe Schulte, Community Services Director, stated that option has been explored In the form of impact foes on square footage. Councilmember Alexander stated he wan also looking at something the company Would maintain Councilmember Buquat stated whon a large lnduatrial project want In at Cooly Ranch, they ware required to build a recroation complex an part of tte project, which employaee used at lunchtime, rod at night it was used by regidcnte. Joe Schultz, Community Servlcoe Director, etatuJ they might be able to use that option from Foothill south to 4th Street. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated it Could be donut but felt the oast fruitful way of doing it wag through impact foes, and explained how they noaded to do that: to balance the economic development goals. 46 stated the days of extremely large land holdirge in industrial areas were past, and impact foes allow you to pool the money to purchase pieces of land. Councilmember Alexander elated the City would than still be responsible for maintenance. He felt they needed to look at game vary different changeo in,order to meat their goals. ,I City Council minutes Oc[uber ga, 1990 Page 5 Jack Lem, City Manager, stated one of the problems was that when they incorporated the City and set that goal, they were already bohind, and that even with Redevelopment resources, they would not be able to catch up to the goals. He felt they needed to have other financing Sources. CouncUmember Alexander felt the people were tired of taxation and they needed other moans to show they are doing something for the employees and the residents, possibly finding private funding for the public benefit. ('.ouncilmember Wright agreed, tt.at the public Uses a project like Central Park and they wonder how the City can afford that park, but not have enough money to provide 5 acres /1000 popul :tion throughout the City. Even though Central Park is not being paid for that way, that is the public perception. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated that most of the residential areas are not in the Redevelopment area, so you cannot use those funds. Councilmember Wright stated that whero moat of the growth will be occurring is in the Redavelopwinc aras end chat is probably where most of the parka will be, that you woLLd not a going back to the developed parts of tom and try to put in parks. Mayor Stout stated that the point he van trying to make was not that they necessarily try to change the goal, but he just wanted to present the idea that it Would be very difficult to obtain the goal if they don't start doing something differant than what they are doing now. He estimated they needed 550 acres more in parkland than what they have new. That Would be the equivalent of 55 tan acre parka, and that they needed to start considering other types of development other than active parkland. He stated they shorted themnelvas in the Victoria and Terra Vista developments by giving park credits for landscaping u.d trail systems. He fait the point wan not to oat a goal that they did not mean to keep. Commissioner Whitehead asked if the Council did not want thoa to count things like the trail cystems in the park inventory. Mayor Stout stated he did not mind including those items as long as the public understood Hu stated a lot of people like park arose just because they are open apace and there are no hams on it. He felt the entire City was not up like a park since they hnvs emphasised the open landscaping and green areas around the entire community. = :unci.meaoer Wright thought it would be pushing the description to may the City its.clf it at up like a park. She felt that was just good planning. :ourcJ ,rmbcr Alexander stated that it a residential Or commercial project was built around a central park area could that not theoretically be added to the inventory. Councilmoaler Wright stated that could be. but she did not want to go back and include anything that has already been developed f Ir City Council Minutes October 7e, 1990 Page 0 Joe Schultz, Community Development Director, stated the school improvements exa adding to the inventory because of the long term commitment, there is also the Possibility of adding another 700 acres if the bond Jesus is approved for Chaffey Park, and also Possibly they can Include the natural area& in the mountains once the Clty has reached build -out. What they were lcokioL •11 tonight would be direction to attempt to change the legislation to allow c.tie•, to finance the acquisition of open space. Jos Schultz, Community Development Director, asked if they would also like than, 1= to study the possibility of impact teas for tho industrial area. C The Council stated yen. a Jos Schultz, Community Dawlopment Director, stated they wanted to be careful to not discourage development by having too many face. Councilmembar Wright stated she would also like to direct staff to investigate changing the legislation. ACTION, The Council concurred for staff to explore changing the legislation to allow greater flexibility for the use of the Clty'a dollars. BJ DItl0B9ION OP waRMrilia IN Th PARR CommLaelonor Rigga stated that since there in a Concern about funding maintorance of the park system, the Commission was intorested LA tta Council's feelings about corporate sponsorship in the parka, such as naxen on the trash cane, or on the scoraboards at the sports park, ate. Councilmembor Wright stated putting a cams on the trash cans would probably be alright, but wanted to be sure the Council would know when to atop. Commlastoner Riggs felt they might also want to look into marketing a product that mskns use of the City's name. Councilmomler Alexander felt the Planning Commission should aloo Usk at any Product they are planning to market, to help docide what aeuld be good or bad for the community's image. Counciimember Buquot felt It was a Policy doclsi�n on whether to be commercial or not, and in the pact the Council has resisted being commercial, such an with adverLiaing on bun stops. Re did sae e■ Sot want to sea them allow shat they a potential revenue source to make them loose perspective as to what they will I,( be getting out of it in the long run. Rs felt they should be able to do '�.• something along those lines, but under very close supervision. r 4ii CC®Lesionor Riggs felt they had a good opportunity with the sports complex. .} city Council Minutes Octobor fa, 1990 Page 7 l received, tbhe Council will t have to be with looking at long lto= maintenance co•tsnfor any project they approve new. Commissioner Riggs stated another thing they were looking at was forming ,r group like 'Friends of the Park', simtlar to tho Priandr of the Library group, or Possibly doing a short film that iivin Do shown at the Edwards Theaters before the feature to raivo the community -s awaroneso Councilmomber Bugnet agreed that they needed to bring the awcrano,s level up in the coorunit'r, that it will havo a long term impact in helping to Cut down on vandalism. Commissioner Mitcholl stated another option might be Bolling the Santa In the sports comps".., with a small plaque on each scat with the name of t person who made the donation. r .e � •t r• r.r t +n Jos Schulte, Community BerVlcae Director, st _CO.I they had discuoaed whether they ahould Memo tho sport, complex something other than the Rancho Cucamonga sports Complex, and the p •sibility of n=1419 individual fields in the complex. as asked if the Cour LI wanted the Commission to explore options for names and submit them to t' , Council for approval. Mayor etov, .rated ..o would not mind having some other name as long as it still had app- • complex in the title so that pooplo did not got confused. .OMs Park and Mocreation Commission to coma up with several altornativoa for names at the sports complex and submit them to Council for approval. BS DIBCDBBIOW OP 1109 OF -- M.....s 'tinCRRh Mayor Stout felt the Commission needed to play a larger role in dealing with the sports groups In town, to put more emphaBln on the recreation aspect of their Co ®iasion. Ma felt they would have more .rportiae in that area. Commissioner Whitehead state, they have tried to gat the groups to come to than. in the peat, but they always and up going to the Council. Counailmo i,or Bugi•ot stated he would like to B00 the Commission act as a sport• council, whore they would have to go through the CcMission far field allocations, etc. City Council Minutes October 24, 1990 Page S Mayor Stout felt the groups should go to the Cetmisaion first, and then only c000 to the City Council as an appeal board, but stated if that happened, the Council would definitely listen to the Ccmmiesion•s opinion on an issue. He stated the emiaaion would have the authority to solve the problems •.wi leads of those ecups He 4420 stated they Would need to be sure :heir were well reasoned out so that the Council could support thr,. The Cmim%imalon concurred that they would to willing to act in chat capacity. Mayor Stout stated another problea they have had m the past is thtt there is usually no continuity in the sports groups frm yoar to year, so there are always psoPlo in charge that do nrt know how things are to be done, and he would like Co Mae the City be seta active in providing stability for these groups. Councilmember euquot felt t1:ey also needed to make the groups plan ahead and consult with the City, such as who, the Little League broke into another division and there were no facilities available for them to play on. He would also like to see tha Comleeion conduct an equitable study of What wau available and start making ours, that groups that have been waiting a long time are taken care of first. Mayor Stout stated he would also like to sae if there was same way they could make the ball fields multi - purpose and usable by both Little League and softball, possibly by having portable pitchers munds for the Little League. no stated he would like to have the Commission be more active, and work with the staff in coming up with Ideas and solutions, tnd increasing their credibility so that the groups think about going to the Coamiosion first, Council instead of coming to the Councllmember Buqust stated he would like to a" them explore etme innovative approaches for expanding or utilizing the resources they have available. Things such to starting a nighttime softball league When the sports complex is built, since there are a lot of adults that work odd shifts and would be available to Play at night Me would like to sso the Ct Laeion work on developing and managing some of these programs end concepts. Councilnomber Wright stated she would liyo to see that emphasize recreation And sports activities in the community, and not Just park davolorment, and play a =Jet role in deciding how those programs should he run and not Just oversee what is already established. COasissioner Riggs Stated she would also like them to consider envirceoantal issues stressed in the Parks, ouch as recycling in the parks. C. 2nlmmWrcATreN2 T2eN f Wo cemmnnlcations were made from the public. •S i f Aeepocttully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clark Approved by Park and Nocreation Co ®iaeion, December 19, 1990 Approved by City Councia: v �. 3< City Council Ninut.a October 26, 1990' iii Page 9 D. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Stout adjourned the meeting at 10,00 p.m. i f Aeepocttully submitted, Jan Sutton Deputy City Clark Approved by Park and Nocreation Co ®iaeion, December 19, 1990 Approved by City Councia: v 3< Dacomber 19, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINDTBS UQUIAr Meeting b.— sALi�9T_� A rOVIaX mating of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council mot on Wednesday, December 19, 1990, In the Council Chamhars of the CSvle Cantor, located at 30500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Ncamlga, California. The mevtlnq vas called to order At 7,06 p.m by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Counoilmembors; Willi" J Alexanutr, Charles J. Buqust 11, Diane wllliame, pamela J Mrlght, end Mayor Dennis I_ Stout Also 8Y1 L present worn, Daniels, Lam, City Manager; Ralph Hanson, AA,lxtant City Attorney; Linda D. lsls Deputy City Mrna96r; Jerry B. Tulwood, Deputy City Manager; Rick Comes, Community DewlOpm.nt Director; Brad Buller, Clty planner; Paul Rougsau, Traffic Engineer; Robert fetterberg, Public Nozke Maintenance Nanagsr; Jim Hart, Administrative Snrvlcea Director; Joe, Schultz, Community Services Dirceter; Duane Baker, A,AL,tant Menogomant Analyst TI; to the City Manager; Diane O-Naal, Chief Donnie Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Tlrs protection Dlstriet) Capt. Brueo 2eln.r and Lt. Mike Ingram, Rancho cuca°nn9a police Department; and Debra J. Ad=o, City Clerk. D 211 No 4nrouncem.nta or presentation, were mad.. ■ Cl. Jack" Bolts, 13849 Ht Gunnison Court, r Zcrmlesion applicants one w gk•e requested the An Council grant sugg.at.d that the applicant be able to attach prior one an interviw and themeelf which would go 41119 with the a De9t °O8mary about opinion that the ant Lz0 City COuncll should;conduct the tintervlws for was also bar Commieolonsre She also expressed her disapproval of Coun011mambsr y Mllliden using the grape 1090 on bar campaign literature as She felt it woe ion that; to what the City of Rancho Cucaxnga !, using. It was her "t opinion that Couneilmembor ;illiama should a 1 po o01to for her actions. - City Council Minutes December 19, 1990 Page 2 D1 Approval of Minutes, November 21, 1990 December 3, 1990 TKS DECLUEER 3, 1990 MINUTES WERE PULLMD FOR DIBCUSSION BY MRYOE STOUT. D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 12/05/90 and 12112/901 and Payroll ending 12/06/90 for the total amount of $1,437,421.83. D3. Approval to receive and file current Inwatmsnt Schedule as of November 30, 1990 D4 Approval of Janitorial Contract (00 90 -154) for City Facilities D5. Approval to surplus vehiclen D6. Approval to exatcte Local Agonry, - State Master Agreement No. STLPP -5420 (CO 90 -155) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California, for Application of State Share Funds for eligible projects for the State -Local Transportation Partnership Program as defined by The State of California. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -469 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING TER APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF THE LOCAL AGENCY - STATE MASTER AGREIOMMT NO. 'TLPP -5420 BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE APPLICATION OF STATE SHARE FUNDS FOR ELIGIBLE PROJECTS FOR THE STATE -LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AS DEFINER BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA D7. Approval to execute Program Supplement No. 1 to Loral Agency - state Master Agreement No. STLPP -5420 (CO 90 -156) for the State -Local Transportation Partnership Program between the Clty of Rancho Cucamonga and the State of California for the construction of Arrow Route - Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue consisting of Street widening, Traffic Signal and Street Lighting. The supplement sets the State reimbursable portion of the project. at $103,638.00 and the City'a portion at $403,902.00. Reimbursable funding from the Supplement Agreement shall be deposited to Systems Development Account. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -470 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND SICKING OP PROGRAM sUPpumm NO. 1 TO Lom AGENCY - STATE MA9TEI. r AGREEMENT KO. STLPP -5410 FOR THE STATE -LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FOR THE CONPLETAD CONSTRUCTION r!F ARROW °, ROUTE, ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO IERMOSA AVENUE City Council Minutes December 19, 1990 Pago 3 08. Approval to execute Program SupPlanent KO- 2 to Local Agency - State )faster Agreamant No, sTLPP -5420 (CO 90 -157) for the State -Local Tranaportation Partnership Program between the City of Rancho Cucsmong♦ and the State of C411fOrnla for the widening of Arrow Route oast u Aol1V%a Avenue to Bevan $36,79. The "thoiaae Nato rtion State reimbursable portion of the Project at 536,796.00 cnd the City" the CSty,s portion Should the need 5213, 766.00 with the pa.n.iaion to increase supylemont Agreemwnt shall be deposited Reimbursable funding tram the Posited to the Systems Oaveloamont Account. RESOLUTION NC. 90 -471 A RESOLUTI0.Y CALIFORNIA, THE CITY COUNCIL OP TILT CITY OF RANCHO Or an "NO AMrU AUTHORISING THE SYECUTION AIM SIONIHO CHCAT N6 N ��PPLEIRNT NO. 2 TO LOCAL AGENCY - STA= .VASTER PARTNERSHIP PROOPJW FOR FOR THE STATE-LOCAy TRANSPORTATION REANOSA AVENUE TO A NIDENISO 07 ARROW ROUTE, EAST OF AAV$N AVENUE 09 Approval to execute CaaPerativo Agreamant (CO 90 -158) with the City of Ontario for the maintenance of storm drain lmprovemonts, related to the Day Creak Channel Project, on Fourth Street from Interstate Route 15 to a Point the 500 feet east of Banta Anita Avanus. This agraommmt sate forth car rights and responsibilities part I'*"*- to the This facilitlae with no exchange of funds being necsesery. of those 010. Approval to execute SupPlomont dated NOV+mbsr 15, 199b, Co the Coot and Atchison* T Agreement (OD 90 -OS3) between the City of Rancho Cucemon a Grade Separation Topeka and Santa Fa Aailway CamPany for Chu 9 and the paration at the A.T. L e M. Railway Crossing designated Milliken Avenue north of Sixth 0treet. 9 YUC No. 2 -95.6D oil Approval to execute a Subordination Agroomont for Lot located at 8406 Orchard Street, 19 of Tract 7176, Submttted by Olen C. and Gillian p. McXillln. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -472 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA' CALIFORNIA, APPROVING a SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT PROW GLEN C. HATCH AND CITY AND GILLIAN P. MC HILLIN AND AUTHORISING THE AYO CLM TO SIGN SAME 012 Approval of Nap, and Ordertnq the Annexation to Landscape District No. 3 and &trot! Lighting Meintonenee District Noe. 1 and 6 for 7arcel Nap 12138, located et the no corner of 6th Street and Buffalo and r p"Cco submitted by tteneley- Wffalo six, Ltd. Avenue, RESOLUTION HO. 90 -473 A ABSOLUTION 07 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHn CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL HAP NUMBER .2338 M J i - City Council MinutoS December 19, 1990 i Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 90 -474 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CURT1.11. TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE D76TRICT 210. 3 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR PARCEL MAP 12335 +, D13. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 12462 located on the south side of Summlt Avenue between Etivanda Avenue end Zest Avenue, submitted by First Family Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 90-475 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFO ?*.IA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT - EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY MR TRACT 12462 D14 Approval to exacuto Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13063, located on the east aide of East Avenue between Highland Avenue and Victoria Street, Submitted by Citation Builders, RI70LVTION NO. 90 -476 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIrOA.VIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITI ^)R TRACT 13063 015. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13304, located on the northwest corner of Terra Vista Parkway and Mountain View Drive, Submitted by Lewia Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -477 A RESOLUTION OF THE CI71 COUNCIL OF TILE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IHPROVEMM SECURITY FOR TRACT 13304 D16. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13566 -1, located on the South aide of Summit Avenue between Hardman Bullock Road and Cherry Avenue, Submitted by Rockfield Development RESOLUTION 170. 90 -470 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C!TY OF RANCHO CUCAHONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566 -1 D17 Approval to exaeut- Improvement Agrs, nt Extension for Tract 13662, located on the sartheast Corner of Haven Avenue and Base Lino !toad, submitted by Lewis Homes. s„ ` City Council minutes Oecembot a9, 1990 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 90 -479 A RESOLUTION O1 THE CITY COUNCIL 01 THE CITT OF RANCHO CUCANONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INPROVMUM AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND INPROVLNSHT SECURITY TOR TRACT 13662 018. Approval to cxscute Improvement Agreement Extension for DR 88 -32 Phase 2, located on the south side of eyaoop Drive north of 4th Street, submitted by Nysscp Properties, RESOLUTION No. 90 -480 A RESOLUTION OP TH77 CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHO.VCA, CALIFORNIA, SECURITY FOR 4 BO HASE�NT EXTENSION AND LWROVENENT D19 Approval to execute Improvemant Agreament Zxtonoion for Parcel 3134le located on the northaaxt corner of Church Street and Milliken Avenue, by Lewio Development Caspasy. RESOLUTION NO. 90-481 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL JP THE CITY r R'O CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION AND ImPROVZNENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL W" 11341 020. Approval to execute Improvemant Agreament Extension for larcel Nap 11685, located cn Down Street at Einlock Avenue, submitted by Jamao O'Brian, RESOLUTION NO. 90 -482 A RESOLUTION OP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONOA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IHPROVE=?T AGRU.MMNT EXTENSIC77 AND IMROVWMNT SECURITY FOR PARCEL NAP 11685 D21. Approval to execute Impcovamant Agreement Extension for 6737 East Avenue, located on East Avenue betwen Rasa Line Road and Victoria Street, submitted by Gerald P.essler. RESOLUTION NO. 90-483 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AOREENSNT EXTENSION AND IMpRCVENBNT SECURITY FOR 6737 EAST AVENUE 022 Approval to accept Improvoaents, Release of Bonds and Notice of Ccmplstion for Tract 9441 and Tract 11609 located on the south side of Oilman Avenue botwnen Hmrmesa Avenue and Villa Drive. r City Council Minutes nooembor 19, 1990 Page 6 R\luaet Phaa+ I Faithful Performance Bond Labor and material Bond 5141,700.00 $ 70,850.00 Phase 2 Faithful Performanca Bond $149,200.00 Labor and material Bond $ 74,100.00 Pheea 3 FaLthtul Perfomance Bond $252,400.00 Labor and Material Bond $126,200.00 Phaso 4 Faithful Facto raunee Bond $ 90,200.OD Labor and Material Bond 2 48,100.00 RESOLUTION NO. 50 -484 A RESOLUTIOn OF THE CZTT COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANCNOA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACTS 9441 AND 11609 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF CDAPLETION FOR THE WORN 023. for Tra Approval to accept Zmprovsou"'"I Release of Bonds and n, tics of Completion ct 33428, located on the east aide of Cantor Avenue at Ashford Street Release) Faithful Performance Bond (street) 5 81,860.00 Accept, Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) 6 8,186.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90 -405 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONCA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTINO THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 11428 M'0 AUTHORIZING TnE FILING LF A NOTIC:. OP COMPLETION FOR IRE MORN D24. Approval to AcCsPt Improvcmenta, Releaao of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13442, located on the north oast Eanyon Nay. Berner of Victoria Park Lane and Raloaso) Faithful Perfomance SOmd (Street) 6612,000.00 Accept, Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street,, $ 61,200.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90 -486 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ND AUTHORIZING THE FILING or A NOTICE TRACT 13442 A OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE I i City Council Minutes December 19, 1990 Page 7 025. Approval to accept Improvesants, Release of Bonds and Notice of Complation for COP 87 -268 located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue. Releases Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $951,000.00 Faithful Parformance Bond $793,000.00 (Stern Drain) RESOLUTION NO. 90-487 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF micao CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IHPROV22ENT: FOR COP 67 -26 AND Ad7HORIEINO THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF O01 @LETION FOR THE NORL D26 Approval to accept Iaprovasemte, Release of Sonde and Notice of Completion for DR 85 -32, located on the north side of Civic Center Drive oast of Uti.a Avenue. Release, Faithful Performance Bond (8trwet) $ 8,500.00 RESOLUTION NO. 90 -408 A RESOLUTION OC THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGIGA. CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PON DR 85 -32 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF LVMPLETION FOR THE WORE D27 Approval to release Nai;.:enanc* Road for Tract 13742, located on the southwest corner of Arrow Highway and Sierra Madre Avenue. Releases Matntanaace Guarantee Bond $ 7,600.00 D20. Approval to accept the Area V N111eide Read storm Drain, from Archibald Avenue to the Alta Loma Channel, Contract 90 -002, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a -Notice of Completion-. RESOLUTION NO. 90 -489 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE AREA V HILLSIDE ROAD --TORN DRAIN, FROM ARCNIRALD AVENUE TO TIE ALTA LOMA CMRNEL, CORTNICT NO. 90 -002, AND AU7HORIZIV0 THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE D29 Approval to accept the 19th Street Improvements, frees Carnelian Street to the went City licit,, Contract 90 -046, ae complete, raises* the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion-. City Council Minutes December 19, 1990 Page e RESOLUTION NO. 90 -490 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTINC THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR 19TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM CARNRLIAN STREET TO THE HEST CITY LIMIT &, CONTRACT 110. 90 -046, AND AUTHORTEINO THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 030. Approval to accept the Arrow Route Street improvamanta, from Center Avenue to Haven Avenue, Contract 90 -063, as complete, release the bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a -Notice of Completion- RESOLUTION NO. 90-491 A RESOLUTION OF I= CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO COCANONOA, CALIFORWIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE AARON ROUT' STREET IMPROVEMENTS, FROM CENTER .AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 90-063, AND AUTHORIZING THE PILING OT A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE wom D31. Approval to accept the Cucamonga Elementary School Field Improvemontn Project, Contract No. 90 -095, and authorising the filing of a -Notion of CGmplotlon- RESOLUTION NO. 90 -497 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TPE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CUCAMO00A ELEMENTARY SfDiCOL FIELD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE M.OTIONt Moved by Williams, seconded by Wright to approve the Consent Calendar Ions the December 3, 1990 minutes Notion carriod unanimously, 5 -0. ...... DISCUSSION OF ITEM Dl. DECEMBER 3, 1990 MINUTES Mayor :tout stated it was his understanding that the following Subcomaitteas were approved at the December 3 meeting, and the minutes should be corrected to rufleat that, 1) Stout and Alexander were both designated as delegates of the City Entry Monument Subc3mittee, 7) Buquot and Nilliama ware both designated as delegates of the Finance Subcommittee, 3) stout and Wright were both designated as delegates of the Park and Recreation Facilities Subcommittee, and 4) Stout and Buquet were both delegates of the Regional Nall Subcommittee. NOTION+ Moved by Stout, seconded by AlesaMder to correct the minute• of Decniber 3, 1990 as stated above Motion ca:rled unanimously, 5 -0. It, , R No Items Submitted . . . • • . City Council Minutes December 19, 1990 Pagr 9 P1. CONSIDSAkTION OF AN APPP.AL OF MU- 21TIONAL DSE PMIT 78-03 &KEN)MENT - SAN'S PLACE - An appeal of the Dlann.nq Co®ission'e decision to extend the hours of operation for an existing bar and restaurant Imated at the northwest corner of Carnelian end 19th Strect in thr. Neighborhood Commercial District - APN, 201 - 011 -56, 58, 59, 60. (CCn'.Iaued fro December S, 1990) Mayor Stout stated this item had boon continued from December 5, 1990 at the requo.t of the appellant and re- eponed the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council wee, John Mannarino, 9333 Bass Line, Suits 110, Poncho Cucamonga, stated that he had researched to bee It there were Any aerial photos in the poesession of the City for this aroa and stated there were not, but that he had tahan the liberty to have a survey done of the areas of the covmaroial canters in the vicinity of 19th and Carnolian, 19th and Archibald, Carnelian and Baca Lino, and Base Line and Arehibald representing commercial autLcity north of Poothill and west of Haven, and reported the information he had obtfined about those centers He staged he did not think Sam's Place was In the middle of a residential area, that it was In a commercial area. he added that since the Pellcgrino's had taken over this business in Harcl, there have not been coeplaints filed against this aetabliahmsnt. Thorn being no further raoponse, the public hearing wax closed. ".ouncilmembor Williams stated she was present the first time this mattor came before the city council and had heard all the comments =do. She commented she had spoke with the residents on Topaz Street and that they were In favor of this establishment. She added she felt Sam's P ace deservod a six month trial period with extended hours, though she did "t feel it was An appropriate use for the neighborhood /caamorclal area, but stated that was act the qu0ction. MOTION, Paved by Stout, seconded by Wright to grant the appeal, denying the artension of hours Councilmmmbor Alexander asked for Mayor Ctout to give details of What had occurred with this business While he was on the Planning Coe- ,lion. Mayor Stout Pcocoodsd informing the Council with this infoma I and added he has not changed his mind about this issue. Councilmembor Wright stated the buainess could be sold to someone nine, and It might not be the good place that Samoa Place is. le iz City Council Minutes Decowher 19, 1990 Page 10 Mayor Stout stated he did not feel this kLwd of establishment chould be located In this type of center for this Particular area. John Mannerino asked if he could address the Council again, stating that previously it was the pray!.aus owner of the business that created the problem and that they did not care enough to control the crowd, that their only concern was to generate revenue. } Coancilaumber Ouqust stated he felt it would be fair to grant Mr. Pellegrino the opportunity for the sir month trial basis a7 long as the owner met the con•'ltfons of the Planing Commission and conducted this extension in gred faith. Mayor Stout stated that Mr. Pellegrino knew when he bought the business what the hours "to and that he is roquesting that the restriction be lifted. Motion carried, 3 -2 (Williams, Suquat no) which would grant the appeal. Ralph Hanson, Assiotant City Attorney, stated A Revolution would come back at the next meating in order for the Council to make this action official. F2 CONSIDERATION OF TINES MIRFOR'S APPLICATION FOR A CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE (Continued from December S, 1990) Jack Lam, City H•nagsr, stated staff in requesting an Executive Session. Ralph Ranson, Assistant City Attornoy, stated that the Council will recess pursuant to California 0o%vrnmont Code Section 54956.9(b)1 concerning a mutter whether this is significant exposure to potential litigation. He stated this would be memorialized in a confidential memorandum to be given to the City Clerk, and would become public after the exposure to litigation has passed. The Council recessed to Executive Session at 707 p.m, and reconvened at Sw07 P.M. Jack Lam, City Manager, introduced Carl Pilnick, the City's cable consultant. Carl Pllnick presented an introduction to TIME Mirror's application for a cable television franchise. Mayor Stout stated ho was in receipt of correspondence from one or Hare attorneys who are questioning the legality of what the City to doing, who ware stating they are not prepared tonight and were requesting that this item be continued, and ware making allegations regarding the netieing process. He asked for Ralph Hanson, Assistant City Attorney, to c,nt on this. i Vt City council minutes _ December 19,1990 j{ pa 0 +11 Ralph Hanson, Assistant City Attorney, stated that what was before the City Council were several letters from both existing cable companies and stated the substance of their argument as to the yrocedun g for lack of notice to schedule the hearings and also that this denied these companies the opportunity to prepare information to present to the Council and that they have requested %•r City not take action. He stated the City has schedule two public hearing', and there has been public notice, but it would be his rscoanenGation to further investigate this and give the opponents every opportunity they desire to address the city Council. It was his suggestion that this public hearing be continued to come time in December, because as Mr. Pllnick stated there are bsneflts to taking action on this in 1990. He stated he felt the Council should provide extra notice in the newspaper so than no one is taken by surprise by this matter. Councllmember Buquet stated he agrees with what wag said by Mr. PLlnLck and legal counsel, and with all faLrnmon to the issue, he recommended that the mating be continued to December 27 at 6100 p.m. if the Council concurred. Mayor Stout staled h+ agreed with what hag been maid and felt it was appropriate to grant the other cable companies sufficient time to prepare their presentations so as not to infringe upon thmi -•• rights or abilities to discuss thin matter, but he stated he felt it should be done prior to January 1, 1991, RESOLUTION NO, r0 -493 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP TIM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A CABLE TELEVISION FRA ""CHISE TO TIMES HIRrOR CABLE TELEVISION Or RIVERSIDE COUNTY, INCORPORATED, USA DIMENSION CABLE SERVICES NOTION: Moved by Buquat, se=ndsd by Alniandur to continue this item to December 27, 1990, 6:00 p.m, in the council Chambern. Motion carried unanimously, 5 -0 No Iteme Submitted. low O1. 0029: jDER TION TO &HEND REFUS'I ORDINANCE By A22INO PROVISION REQUIRING PAYMENT FOR REFUSE; COLLECTION SERVICES MOTtoill Moved by Wright, seconded by Alexander to set the public hearing for thin Stan for January 16, 1991. notion carried unanimously, 5-0. n,:iL r City Council Ninutoa December 19, 1990 Page 12 02. pj@s'USpIONgp PROP09M1 ACTION PLAN 70A DAY LANORLR I95VE Staff report praoeated by Jorry Pulwood, Deputy City Manager. Councilmamber Wright asked if the Task rorce would work on Phanes I and II. Jerry rulwood, Deputy City Managers stated they Would work on both phases and then present the concept to the Public Sifstf Commission. Couneilmember Weight read into the record -the City of Rancho Cucamonga is desirous of rodLOing community tensions and working with all residents toward the implementation of fair, bumante solutions for all involved, the workers, the residenta, the business community, the general pvbllo, and all other concerned parties. Thera are no aWle oolutions. it is recognised that this is a major x ial issue, immigration issue, and enforcement iseuo.' She otated she is proud that thin in the approach the City is taking and not just dealing with the law enforcement aide of it. Mayor I.-cut opened the maatinT for public comment. Addressing the City Council was, Due Murray, 8651 Yoothill, next to the Labor Camp, stated there was recently another fire in thin vicinity. 6.is otated there have been four robberies just recently, and that the transients come into her yard. She stated that she and Captain cilmors had ouggested the owners be made to level the property except for the trove, she ougoaeted that Rancho Cucamonga investigate the same typo of plan that Ontario has for thin typo of problem. She also suggested there be a patrol ear in the early morning hours in thi+ araa to help with the problom. Mayor stout asked hoc if she wo•A.d like to be part of the Task rorce. Mn Murray etatad yon. There being no further public ramanta, Mayor stout closed the public comc.ant section. CouneilMember Alexander stated he agreed with both phase, of the plan as submitted. NOTION, Moved b; stout, seconded by Wright to ayyrove Phase I and I1 NLtion carried unanimously, 5 -0 Councllmombers Wright and AI- xandor stated they woull like to servo on the Task Vorco for this, with the Council Concurring. 01. UPDATE RRpORT ON THE fA'1 OCRNARDING_MVNTY PARK AND OPEN 6PAO DISTRICT paRTICIpATION PROCSDORS Staff report presented by Joe Schultz, Community Services Director, who proceeded to introduce stove Nesaerli to Introduce the ` program. , Cttr Council MlnvtAs December 19, 1990 ►aqe 13 Stove MeoAs[li made a prAsant&tien 0n the Ban Bernardino County ►ark and Open Space Diatrict participation Program. CounCLimombor w111iam asked 1f the District does pans Couatyvids, but not pass within our own City, is the City bound to an agreement to stay Wlthia that District and &sass* the residents In Rancho CLe not want additicn&1 tasea, amo'pa who have stated they do Mr. MAsSarli statee the way the District is set up 1s as a special berwwfit Aeueesment District thec*by requiring a 601 "Jority vote of the District. Me stated it you had a situ&tLzn warts one City was under that go% they ww14 be included in the Diatrlct. Re added the proviso for getting out of the District would be to initiate do- annexation procedures through LhrcC. NO stated to unne* into the District would Also be through LAm. as Stated that due to vaa'lous problems going an in the. World and other significant problem the Country to facing, the percentage Appears to have dropped for thou people latermstad In participating in this program. Ne added it vas bis epinlon that !f Rennie Cucamonga did not partioiyate, the whole District would probably not 0o through, Councllmeabor Williams Asked what the manwtary, benefit wcald be to Rancho Cucamonga. Joe Schultz, Community Services Director, stated thors are 33,760 parcels time* 536.00 which would total 6590 000,00 to mo $610,000.00 per year to Reecho Cucamonga. a. Wright asked how the Asawas0unt Collected wouLd be distributed, Mr. Aessarll stated that 501 of the mo. oy collected would go to the City. ISO added the twn projects the District would be funding that would 41r* ly benefit Rancho Cucamoga Would be Cucamonga- OUastl and the Door Croak Ratural Area (:hatfay Regional Park). Ile stated there would be a )Mmoraadua of Ocderetanding which would outline the responsibilities of the District and the City. Joo Schultz, Cam unity Services Dlroctor, stated the Intent tonight was for t City Council to srpcae their concerns. the ncerns. Be stated that 04 Decoober 30, 1090 it would be going " the Park and Recreation CommLssi0e to mks a r.cCrm &ndatLQa for the City Council, and tla.t a Resolution would be coming back to the City Council in January fur their action. Councllmomber Buqust stated he felt theca should be a subsquont warkrhop aft" this Information was presented tonight. Jack Lm, City Manager, stated they are nat asking the City CounaLL for 44tjoo, only to got the Council's rope& and to answer any "stlons. us stated yhk park and ReCreatf0n Camlosion world be Considering this on December 30 4vAa, t?/,n a full package would come back to the Cauncl, in Juuary, r City Council Minutes j Wo her 19, 1990 'r page 14 i J" ichults, Cossuuntty esrlicoo Alraator, suggested this sow Wok to the Cwt tl l I ►d1 1 que loeelt jd again ge bACkk to tbo Cowelt at tbir dsnnry 9, 191` ""Ing in order to asst the gourd of ivpereleon' ties 'tablss. CmAeLima ber VUlleas asked it rn, public would be catlfled at this is order tar them to erprssa their teelLras oa this setter. Jw scbeltr, ccemunity satvLloe Director. steted La public bessloy would artusily be co,tdsetwd by the sosrd at eupsnlson. mayor 4LW% stated he wall like for "=he cucama"A to have a ribtic ba►riag of theta ems. Ccunollsomber Might Kated ohs waste like to have AMawrs is qusstlaaa a to What regional�Pat", I" wwhichattia City vwldLDot4st Lnp so" with no pass 70&r thm(l for WWI LOG. ae rpoaes to galling bot it this wre handled throwgk the County with no setae, �i gr the %Lade of projects to be dm* in tko City. 8119 tslt this ww14 t.e rive pcoscti" and raapselble oo the Nrncil'a part. Ace staled she wowid s1M like the lark aM Dsersatloa tb®l lion to cnestder this flPtlm- the eked that thla lotor"tlsa be brrught back at the Meat elotocsien. Cwoalla Aber Mgset wggeeted alwiv be a jelet nestles with the lark mad ecrsrtlen Corsi"I" oa tbla natter with public rotics to the 8M4tdents. Jaay Loo. City Mawg►r. suggested this joint su.eting be scheduled between Jaasary. 1 "a 39 with the Dart aaa Mere +tL28 Coswlssles. ACriDD, council contvtred to meet jototly with the tars' eM 1NCrsatloo cartetee. 1 1 • . • . ad. Community ""L"t DLroctor. report rromentsd by Jae Jack team. City Manag►r, Mated this sgrwsat is 4"190ad tar the wills" Lynn c,.V,y aed Mrebart seildere to work cwt the "Change of the mrney. wlsu stew% sakes Mlph Maeus. Aaaletent city Attortwrt. it hs agreed with this procose Miles Masses. Lt+elstant City Attorns7, stated ye►. :c a Mayor itcet efened the aretiog tot psbi Lo oosarnts. fddruslag the City Gowxlt �g wart i Y J. Ciuy Cuanail Minutes December 19, 1990 Page 15 Jackle Dolda, 11849 Mt, Gunnison Court, Questioned why this type of monetary agreement was done with a Land shako and wondsrod what had happened to the interest on this money. JACk Lan, City Manager, further explained this agraoment, and statod this typo of agreement would not be awed in the fetus. Them Wing oo further response, the pjblle -saeents were closed. S XDTitV' Maysd by hlaxsader, ■scondsd by MJillano to approve the agrasaa�lt with the Kilian Lyon Company. Motion carried unoclac sly, 5 -0. I1. . • .. t . total keport) Mayor Stout statod the interviews haw not taken place for the Planning Coaminlon. CcuWLlmorber 5uquet Added the Subcommittee has not bean able to got these scheduled and esggosted this Come balk to the City Council for approvAl at their January 14, 1991 meeting. Counoilmember Wright concurred. Counallmocber Suquat suggested applications continue to W accepted through the month of December. The following Appointments were modes LnvirnnmSntal Manaermene CrrtmS f Dlans O'Meal stated Deborah MicJals was the Subcommlttoe'e choice for Appointment to the Snrlromaental Manageonnt Commission. Mayor Stout stated Mo. Nichols made the eleventh person for this Commission, but suggested the memberabip number for this CommisaLOn be sevlewed this name,. OounCllmember Wright concurred this should be done in sir months Diane O'Meal clarified that Co®Sesloner@ Barra&, CAmpbsll, Gaye and (loss would be reappointed. .. MOTtOMI Moved by Stmt, aseonded by Alexander to appoint Daborah Michole, and reappoint a LesLone[e Saxwes, CampW1L Gaya and Ion. Motion cavrlyd unentmously, 5-0. .y fg, City Council Minutes 1Yµ December 19, 1990 Page 16 NOTION, Moved by Stout, seconded by Wright to review thu membership of the CommLoslon in June With A recomsandation coming back to the City Council in July for the entire CcunoLl's rovtew. lotion oarried unanimously, 6 -0. Public Safety Cammlmsj= Y; �= Mayor Stout stated with the resignation of Clyde Soyd, the Subcommittee in suggesting that Coeoleaicnen Vast, Yankovich and Quintana be reappointed, and „ that Wayne %etaily be appointed to the Public Safety Commission. MOTIONI Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to reappoint Commissioners t- West, Yankovich and Quintana, and aypoint Wayne NmtaLly. Notion carried unanimously, 5-0. Park and Recreation Commission Councilmombor Buquet suggested Brun Ann Mahn be appointed to fill the vacancy on the Ccomleslon, that Nark Whitehead be reappointed, and Ann Punter be appointed to the Park and Recreation Commisaion. NOTION, loved by stout, seconded by Alexander that Bruce Ann Hahn be appointed to fill the vacancy on the Ce®LamLon, that Nark Whitehead be reappointed, and Ann Punter be appointed to the Park and Recreation Commission. Notion carried r' unanimously, 5-0. p• t 1 Mayor stout commended the people that applied for these positions and appreciated their dedication. Ccuncilmember Huquat hoped that these people could servo on task forces that might come up in the future and wanted staff to be more and contact them when an opening comae up for something. ' Mayor Stout added these individuals could be utilized through the City's Volunteer Program that is in the process of balm organized. Counoilmember Wright stated when she asked for information on utilizing theme people she did not state when it Should coma back to the City Council and stated she would like a memorandum to be prepared for the next meeting. Jack L.m, City Nanagcr, stated this would be done. I7 PORT-OH CHOICCS YOUTH aBRVICBS "AOORAH staff report presented by Capt. Bruce fein..r. Councilmember Wright als commented on the success of the program and suggested the refuse haulers also get involved with this. She also suggested the people involved with this program be honored with a protlamataon at the next Council mating. city Council Minutes: December 19, 1990 Page '17 ACTIons Report received and filed. 10, HOBili HOME PAU (Orel Rcyort) staff report preasntRd by Diane O'Neal, M &mgwmnt Analyst II, who stated that at the last mating a resident of Sycamorq Villa Mobile Ham Park raised concerns regarding their lease agrewnt and the Mobile Nom Accord, and that since that meting the Coanoll Subcommittee met and gave staff direction to correspond with the Owners of that park and contact the rexident■ that Were offerwd the lease without pomslbly knowing that the Accord exivtedo she stated the correspondence was sent and the agent for the owners was contacted also. She added they would be following up on this prior to January 2, 1991, she stated staff will be working with the City Attorney's Office on the provisions of the Accord to see what alas can be done to make ear& that the managera of the mobile home Parks are making the new reddsnts wan that there is the Accord and that they don't have to sign a separate less& agremsnt with the OWnstx to move into the Pavk. C*uncilmumber Wright stated that she has read the lasso /rental agreement. She stated in mix months the Council will be reviewing tha Accord and that the reason the Accord was originally drafted was because of possible unfair treatment by the Owners towards the rsaidents, even though Cho amen stated they wanted to prove good faith. She stated thin leas* / rontal agreement dons not prove good faith. CouncilmemWr Buquet stated he would 1—%:, for the city to look for and investigate a remedy on behalf cf those r&aidenta that have had their rights violated. Ralph Hanson, Aoaistsnt City Attorusy, stated once the -sport is completed they will com back to the Council and ask if they want to take any action. CounciLaamber Buquat felt the Owners should be Redo aware that they are supposed to comply Witt. the Accord. Councilmember Alexander stated he dome not feel the Owners have operated In good faith Mayor Stout rotated not all park Owners are bad and should not be lumped into one category. HO'f1ONw Koval by Wright, seconded by Alexander to bring back a report at the first mating in February to work out the problem*. H3clon carried unanimously, 5 -0. ' City Council Mlnutss December 19, 1990 page le Jl. Councilmsmber Wright stated one would like for the subcoomitteas for the Commiaoions to work on the evaluation process and interview process for Coaoissloners. Councilmomber Buquet Mated an opplioant IN not 1Lnited to only returning the applicataon, that they my submit mor7 inforantion if they choose to. Mayer stout stated he likes the idea of a narrative being attached to an application. This Council concurred this would come back at the January 2, 1991 meting. e Is is • • • No communication was made from the public. MOTION, Moved by Buquot, eacondad by Alurandor to Sojourn to Baecutive session to diacueo pending litigation with Matti Enterprises, which would adjourn to Doc —bar 27, 6100 p.m. for A spacial orating to dismiss Times Hirror'o cable franchise. Notion carried unanimously, 5 -0. The coating adjourned at 10,02 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved, is _,q '•- ,. .. :'. I �NP J�H VW_ =;0 i0w fNUfi ON♦ J M O V r• E 9 :e e OD OON000 OMF. OryOwOONJryNOONOQ00000VOOwO0Y00O00FwNONh O. . . . O. N F••hVONWNNNONODNN ' p OONYNJODVNVNO :NMFFNFhNw O N •O'10 ^FO'FOhF +FAry000FFO000N N_OItlJwNypIOMwNNPJNN NN N" OwNw •wi.M1w.wrONNw!^�P NNF IOFwVFN. ^^N • wV V wNN N ryN hN �.N T N N N A A A a A A <i •iiPO• N J h....l... :.. :NV=i.•O POw•Iw•NiM14POwNNyNihf Per »ywN ^hOP tl3h:F.: :: SSSSS..: SS'. SS . ^ + ^.:: ^.:RR�wXRRRNRNMNNNNNrRh ONNMMNMNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMNNMNNMNNMMNMNNMNNNMNNM V VOIF Y_J • y F iYOM O Y N w WN jag •iNa J fN L Y S� • < ~ Y 00 Y NO 1 N\ U \YV H" O •NIN J N J ippi\\ J e N •i�J `: IiblV Ni `;f ; Icy WO »Y vn `ryw o$ •<• V Hy O fJ i %VMN N IL FW�OON tN Va,VNiW y F L YNNih SCi "AYNiOVaDaYY% L�� N 2i • NN > >i M �•`IYYLf \CO `WCYO V NFaS�IO�a"YOI ia�JWO i CO \i i N`a =YVY \ <N J04 J OW6NNFN l Ma>O� UONUaJh it ONfO 1 w yWWO2V IF hYMYn.li 00h Y YiM�wCMp2AV C 7 i•4WW ••OFYO \iYN• •Y i.iy•V•��i N <yi V_ i JiONOF Y YVYwi VJVViv iWYV =� J�CY�OitiAWN� a >� VNI <NVY.`•� 1c0CV YYINYWY �I yy Y JNy"N �A'•�j•`ryNY <`O�'• p0`NN.aihtOFi J'�iV"VwYONM'O�"iJ oVF•`/ 4 NF rOMF C<F LV VrVyYYFY \VNNiO M TW <••r �W�YNOJUf VW 70NOt1P4NYJF�OrNV:O \pVi"W \NVWO Y „Nf2VY SMFiiN= WiiYNFYY»YOOF NIr•MSOFYihVNV.Y.lNiwYYwl r VOVVS f �VaV CJU.fF w YaJ..V.V..... 3.. r i YNtV�YiOOfiViiNNiNLHiNVJ•�i iVWyiJFVry w y f „ y • y' WN � r` r u W M1 W N V a >M S MN • Y N W n liN r °si tA" ' L ri A a tw rs 4 ` iN � y pp J`wA y o a y NOJh L A: HL�p Y� J • +U i_ � v i � :rt� tS rN N Y NN�Y WNiO JH N w" Yr F O V� H YMY iFV//N��Yf eVii V YVw=`= WN Ni JMY ` <i i.`•Pt UN iY'iVNV i W rYV =0 >4 J iiWON W OJNYY•�ViJOVyIY-JSNO<i O it Y lReRRA :�ic'�Y.tl:W.Y89...4c "J•°.:� :R r!W G..........r'. �u 44u ao eYwhooN hNpfs rrM1 v • Y oN.WVbTeY o .' •N�Y •v VOf< OYiVM40YYi`y iM V1f�NVi >W < N`iu�ry\ r 4<4 SWO.\•NNY i FO ieM�`NJV •r WJ i �O/aW •i �ih •NN)N FN OiY OYSOiaN { OiJ •YV w 5M1f YV` tVwrf O ✓P Ai:NW 4YLY OOOV LJFYYFYf iV VOO YNYi JU4FW J {� pp �FNNso. a YYYV SNM O�yACa Jf� 1FtV <iNwOWO�iyJN rY V AWViYr OJi1iNNNJY 1rVNYW r0'!'JVf YYN4:ifiWJJA bF < PNVONM Vr< fffVf <r <feeeeeiVUYVYVV000000G�Y YaWY \.Y JYV 1� y P.•ONNN wOPNOOYVihiwM1NiN •iM1PNNwFNNwFNpNONPNN.iNOOF• N.N.ON .N NiNNN.4•Nrr ONaNN�PNlei'•r N�.Ojy Or�nryN^Nw�.fiiN �� JN VNw NN NNNw4 Ny ♦wN . Vw NN "` ri f O iNw V:^ OTO Si ILO nOM J w � U N• w� ui a. AI Oil Y� f0f1 Y: _O •i �l •YI .OI •ZI • >1 of�onraow. eenon.• wu. neawoeeNNNwNN.......... .swoeeoapf wino\ aoNOeaf N�wwoYYf nwwuffnwN ewnneNS.�.�n ape VNVYVwOM1IJNOwMawOhfhlOM r�jOOMVww/INOwVeYNO wI10yy/jwaNOf FP wwnaf M1f wnrNYYeanw YnnNNNNnflnn >h•rn NwwnNwJwfwnYwoew do =w0 NN NNN N my :N I. rI .. N N N. w ry V JOw N• of NVM1YNOwNN.IN OM1ONOMNMVNaM1ONOwNwVNVhONOwNnONVNOwO O�M» MN ���h q^ NFFFFFFFFFXX XXXt',XXXFFFF;, » »FFFXXXXXXSXXxF /.M MNNNNNNONNNNNYWI ri1N NONNNNNMNNNMNNNNNNNNNNMNNNNYNNMNNN O= W V P � O M n OY IJ N Oi PW N 00 i YiOMO > \WOi YAOA4iNa1 OWY A S NN: JhWli.`VM Y piOCNL YJOVYSWTWJ YOFS aYU >iV oriir upif yYpYN�Ya.w W U >YtaLYOY> O TL OL \ �» 4 •T W i ±V N N h iYU • �O O Z�Vy N vV0 � N = ♦ r J MZ n> 1 > rN Y MO J w. 2 NYO N. �i r v% a .Iii •. °i� Y iU�IY >YYNNO �\ »\ M N`NYYiT �Aww�raiFwJ II U _eh MLOYN JJJ J A 1�M Ui JD�Oi IiL�h � aL1TNY•OIY ULNL W„OYVO_i7DY N OLNNWOFYMM\ nNT w . TLLjN} _ 1Y.YJ� }�.rY(t�Wii�IT OYV�N•p. V�y YYUiWMWiiVf YYYNLYJYOiOMUO .hiN�NThhOihWY.OYN.O.NtCStN VwLi pYV�J1N1 wO }•ii }NiOwLW}Y >Nit VCYjVOtR�yS�j YEMNYw;Y��V \ l FO \ \\ a p w u F S i >Y N M SY yy WpN }O e I ,YiS� •YW O .emu •nn „NS .. w �Y.Yi� •NhOYO O jO ll`....... r� .... [i• JW O O [M \Ma�fVYJNOY r n • >u =Xwliw IYM•V.WL � NINOJ. iVYiWMtVYUNnnJ= ��JwNWCwiMryS�W f T • N MJ O • J.Li w Vw S• NN Sf a .a aew �o .+ Ytt iY O Y NihO�o {u .. `l`�O u YJ ii ii o of o i �o TIYTy u u� O �YSOO� Yi y N lVY y� N FF w OhaN hN 1. j wN=NlJTJLi M .YiJW� Y �YrFr ��yyj y Vo.NFMY t> ey TYN..r1p \JJOw1. 7•/W }wJYi y� • JM NMN ��11 J MY. Twj�NY�W +) i 3�C/rt�M JJNQiwrNO .NfOwi »��Y •ipO�O.hI J YJOJYVONY F NahMJ 7NYSiJf i„ YYYVSNWWVVJ WOYYf WNNiO 1Yi •f N0 JOY .�JM1h OMYN.YWO fy uN >a 11•If •l 1tYSC »:'JpN Y�VOa ISf Yj jaV paM......fw »�nY1VVLr •..VwMwjN y TJJ YhOp Lf YVV •NhV .��T CMFVFFJN ZS fONW Ooi NNl yN• fo JJfJf✓ V NrOO�Jn�6fMO�iV�Mt{L >f �wU�O�LC�Or�LYM }UryY�Y�wTVYVpO SiS•i..liwYNYYYYYI�/J JJSClf iOnLLLL \aa�aY.lYUr.NNNNIIMNNNNNN O^ NNO> NOVVNMO IwNary00MNVNVMwwNNNnMNNNVOVVNOw. MNry >w0 VwfONNNONwNNNN00l VNwNNNOFwfMnOVNOwNOVNVYVNSNNNwVV Nnw! >wNnwNNMNNMNVNNN >.w.MwNONNNNN NNNNryIVVNOVWNVVwryN Nw N V VN NNNNVMMI N u o.. yY0 oio ea zao f0� OFV OY� J F Y a f 0 OZ ii of YI N� Oi I• OOAIV1 ............ .NNN1.NNVOOnON O OOONYwdNMiMMtiNwYNNN O w :wMn.N °NwyVVVNNON> ^ N NV n N a i JwMNVNiNq.OYMnVMiNq. SF »FFFFFFFSSSSSSSSSS an w F w w w..n n..w wn w w n nn V aYN N V\ l`J On aNN I ii °w `Oi NU I F � ra N iwio �a �. + fW on YI UOfV flN� Jw _° NwiZNiH4�Vp1 e.Ii W• n i`uiii�u ir\. ali wiNYw* °o NYN iNgJYl�.gqNr I9MI >VYF6�lwpMjpfYY •Iip YINIwV ppJJ J ywypJYN HiVi.N1V �VNNM�NIOHaOr J J Ir oN u �s 3Jf a VVY\ Y O Z OOfVw �M�wYIOW M W O..Vai YO MJFiVIfn NZ •Fpq�i \WVt •JMWNCf�y >��J`Ol �Y 'J OO ♦i NYY�u i�JW1(pOfYpY1 ^N Y�. iJJhOiwY~IINJNNNNY NNNNM��MFp9 >aSlaafiN •YYn�M��rOM>wwFif00 ♦NNNMNNNwNMNMFNNNVI� ,f 3 O w 3Ct D;O iY LO �o» ONY J` w O Y L 1 O .. ♦... N.♦.. .....00 ♦wO01NNNM000NF ♦ONpOpOhON O O 00 MO♦ M. N♦. �w ♦ON........................... O ' ♦. =• •NNN INFN.♦ .INh ..O......Mw�OM..li.e.11l.www N N ♦ «MCNyOIN ♦MNN..N...lI.NM ♦�.yNh „FFNNNw^ M II OM ryM N. ..w N . 1• N « M ♦ N � ♦ C . „ A n n w n • w n w w n J..FYMM�.O w......... ♦N ♦ ....... I ........ .......... ♦. ea�A: �saa��sr, GS. �SSSS9S4438777J997797 'i7�71J7�.�7777 ^.90 oiwiii. �l.Y �ilwwwwln h:lwwwwwwnwwwnwwlnewwiln wwnnnn wi�ilr «In it w.w wl�nw V V 1 1. I I 1 • . O Y .. Y . f h ♦ Y M ♦O• N M ♦Y Y N i • A w • Y. P Nw Y PV. : Y IJY .Y . M P Y'I1 \♦ ♦CNFCP .. Y OsC NO �^ .a C .FwC i y, ~VwV VVVNYy Y YY W Y' NMM YY VM ` •1NNW iY IVVV VNVY Y iY � fiY.Wl •V fC.•.+ C�si wY <i V V ♦ VYNV VY YWW.iV •1. WLOYJ O.Y ♦E .V F W� J •J��J1 YJ JJ „J =Y J1y\ N J .,Y \. yyJ Y r•>y1I W M N Y �< O. •L 0.1L NLY•Y•.WiC `~.L .aM Y9.E• • Y w F'iJ NONOOiE�M�••O yOOON:O <y: •41Y?0 yy r.11 • �ME OOM "ENO f Ci yYMMMF�FIh VhF N1yWh >Y JJNF>i1M OiliYh.NyYFNF Y Y O O 1+•< 1`R1YYY�pY.YY <C�WNyiy Fi1N.�LtVY�JJihNY•VJJ \CJW O O Y Y .O Y<\«` �..iM,r <U »�ryCMW2C0 <100iY <YrCJ01 VE u >ei.$.....Ct o %.Z.J 3+s>i6ri'o i w s O V N O NFii < , Y M LU Y yJ L V M Y• yi M V h C t r G �< N f iY> W L <•O E V�SN I V � F N Mi O N N "N`Y.J•MV�YW >H yN! via: N I V y O YMYNr MI YYVN O M<YLN..%Zs.V <t4 9 A G w E: "98 »D »EliitII GG39 a`�rN•5.i3 «ES`19C «EOJ'9 N Y Y M V »VYJy•Y LOYNJNOJJ •YMOOYO W,.<V FMYY♦F�,f F V E YY�y00 t yO NN »wsVNYIY'J4�s�( IN C•1J O1� O < NO �SY.C19fi O <1 FFhM< ••li �i .:r.Ni ipJ S01<N O 1 O M _ MO {V{ fVf»MfpMMlhyN iil i <11 M•11 ,�II pLo z .Y�11 ��Y//tpYlO < >< JJ OJ » C C f <OYtC�Z NYMYVYO �UiCY <SNipOf.Y.t�W IFiYCH _ IF J LY NYY f•LYYVFiMFNN YYNUN fJ« lMe rNiE r <I • w ` eY00JJiClYYrYM 'J >N «tyNJJOb_Y_r9 « <wY w . V S b J YN «<4y ♦4 «N «1y <NtONle.eie ..VUVVV�V • ^ N ^ rF FYINwONIwONNNNNhwNrwFMNYh ♦NlNweew ♦NON w< iYlrlaFeNleewMON NOeNNN ♦♦wlww. N N♦wluw<wN1e> N p Y Mw ♦NNNw ♦NNryMNMwNNNwN NMeNNNwN ♦N NNNNN w ♦ 1♦ � ♦ ♦IN ♦ ♦w w M♦w ♦♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ ' Y �N! Owl 0;0 LSLO ioy aw. J u i 7Y •i �Z •O H « °e °cii °e wwni +w °On °ee ier+« S! ee «woiiiiinr «w «viwoeiva +w�weraw •iril =l�iN w•i•:•:i rewr:ivawu���nFwn +n «I:w ni •:wnwJweiriee N.nNN NNNi»nINNVNISMnniJ Nwln nOlnFN „n»NNMSJN^MPNNVN. :J :FNJN Nn N N J n N N ti i JYF.w.NNNJMJF000wNnINVFMwO wMHINJF .wOYFF'Ff FrIP.•wNNJMV OHNNNV•N HMn N•1AHNNNNNNNNNNM NN NNNMHNNNHNNNNMHHHNHNHNNHN Y • • ••• • � M O J J Vn ww FOM P • w NH M YN NHFF W ^YS N Y r > i e nee« : �^.i.. .r. yrii ••.� .iw o Nnr• i • J •V P N•LiJ •IN � OSV >SY Md •. \ O �1 • .I HO. J =\ y» •YU t YNUNYU YYY> UM O Y« SFrr .9 r�ryra ve '•.{YirY�> rid N ?a•ui� 9 �r Jull 1 Imll w JJIIQO IrN F NIV YJ r. f0 H \ t JS�• _ � JMNL �yy p ` M Vp= JwMSMSYN •N V V_N MiY �OSi 03U Y :L Y^ OS:' iY HYS AwJNSSV J'J . . . ON. <J iJY i K•J�`NM OAJHNLY JYHIHH:: I.u`..nVN:.i Fij •'= yitMM^FMY •OJM OY ••YSs•YO •J•�••N3V0 •N OOiJ?Yi•FJJ ONJJ: •S NMMNLYSNSO N�tNU.FNNNYNV NSNFNNWN�I;Fi yVV FF�IINNY <YHMyN Y�w NNVYY�••J�Ji1N0 VO�S�CYYUNYrHVMYyVSSSrSNiSYyyiMFY .L.:iW �oiJrii w « «i35wsszu�Li i°z aiwonii�iii�uN «�Wiiiiii•<Iwrii.�i YL�JSLVi�•L�iiMYY�YSiii \�'�SF ��LMYyyyYY YYL�WNSLwWi�� yYMFYYwY•`YOVLrY \ >YYY <VRVY�YO OYr� •� O J.yiYy ••IO w'J rFyYNiNYiOy IwVwY YYYVYY YY iYLM.Oi O�r L.VYNO J u o i V y V O J Y i W y •iy Y Nw Y r F S CC O Y Va � SN < N L • YSNVWJ OJLJ 8a 9 Ka a Y C iC :3599 a Ya99 LLMU 7 YI NU \.iY Y iYNi Fia zi i '1 • Y 'u .e•Jr F O {'JYS �F <Y M•N�U N <��O •N < >SJS O. Mw�OMY Y M yhN <Y V rMYN Jl O utFiiJWiFNiyLNF yw �Y••t VL fHH FyNy�11)i. a. JFJ pip�1I Nyyi Y WOr� +O SUSfiVNYYwdSWiV SNJZd MV.W O�JMSYr�NiJF�•� OMU F•' FYwYw�N <Fi0 NLNJOSyL.< 912100 T.Y wi <iVi >! L 9pi •F//r yi Wyi>Yy fJ iN NYYNV• < Y JLiyY i OOOY y M .iVfJOi ML ►YLMVffJNa >YiJYF •i O'1� f C L••� �•IV •Vy iti yYy YJJF J_. Y�[[N f VL f iiJfWJY <Y•F•��M �sYs�111� {1•.t�t J�i0 i +0i+ i'•YNSMWFYaOYi< V•Yy34FtVYMh•F`f SN �” 9 �UYwV.iiSrOY�JJOM�YNSYHNi.UM � NYNFJLFVYWNMWY YVUVOOOOOOOOOOYYL LLYVVYUSVUi !'FLLSSNNNMl1'•lyyyKJJJJJ N_ Jww. NKVNhPPJNHwJJJNVFHYJF .OPOONNHJN.NfHMJPJNhHY1NM wAPN �NJwwiwNmNNMw „lug••Mihw�N•V•nMN•i•iwwwAwwMw .NJww WNwV NIJ Jw V i\r NNM N NMMN NN NNNNN NM HNHN -I J O IINP �5< w rho :LO OM tl ONL FJ F D V L P O 7 J Y 6 �f s �f •O •Y NOO;n•eeDeoFwe „eooeeewaewnJneawe wf •.eNOF•wPweenJelelyN e• w nM ^ O«SNNOwOP1 Fwwwh.O.M.On000:...MeAwO 11FenlyryNNFw S:yfOyweS00w:0'..MVIwJwes . =4 Mn MwnVOn O 40•wNe4NO4 PnwF y nn : w OO FnO lOeyN . n N: nnn INOw e n 1 yw w w^ N wwy w w ) n N L jMYpOwNwIYVYeppNMwIwJM 000NNNIwVMYpONrywIMJFYpO..MN1Y yF Id33Y^. SSy�. c^w•^ I��P. 3°. i..°. 3F. I: plw„ Cpp ..�.•�GG•CCCCCCCCCCCCCCIw.CnCR onwiNnnwwww „www „ww+l.�'w"'w"n wiwiw ^ ^ ^ ^w ^n ^wwwnn•w.nwwwwww.wi lwriww u. w Y • • f . u ff fa 1 V w 5N1 V � N V N N S ipJ IFV M 1 „VM ti A .Y. YA .f ewo a J =Y Np w IUM y� \ N w f Y «M l _M n OOf »J 1 w p N Y Yp O •YiF V` a \ i N fU» YNOY p yYef N MLV . p YN• MW 0 5 I FiN1Y O w N I =Yn N N y U iNVi�FO O 1` IYJYUL_S f w p S MY wN 1 a =U A_M i• • NNw f O w OM YY YYIpYVw .N1 .'ii'o. Irpi.3.prYtl ♦off VYNwY. » YY.s N O j�Ay :p O iFY • \iY . JLaNNS J «�i6.1 YI.wYW o 3NNU 7Ny» Ni a O�r'.ONfOiY Sl O 1.... .. tiN ow' �e y LY�y<�12w� l0 Y ^iANrFr�p U» i Y N . O�`A`A�iwOOYp w YOO ON .... YOYpfJAewJ Yw IM `ry`yYJ w�wL .. YOa.i.LiMaMNSFNMN yy V ii YYVNN: f Y.. S.YNVYA iYiy N yiaN�f Yl.'a�SL YVY.YrDV` w dN `FVJY L iLaOw YJ Y♦ alU UO �V�'iF.••Fi YwNf VOidwfwY.�iUJry \i�iwLIAFVFf�VY iNii O «IiNNJF Jf L'if�O JY JVNJiOIMJiSYFN »ii•Ff� M1YLYiwJi`Nf ip OYJ {� V i N lYiL 1II YYN y•J Ji MF.L NiNY >iL iWANAJYNLY 4M AX yNL LiYrYr ::3Y�Y35YV.3...P V y � V W «N i • •ii MI L r J J r ff.0i • M N O i ViOFY i N pO „M.} J2< iypY �y�Y f9 'J » �OfO�• Y iUSY 5��3 i0 Y; 1 C� N O 1. MY�U.L. M JOO yN YNJLYMiV JYY f YLiYM VO �I i .�Mf •i 0Y f� p� O <FS i L J O fYiIIpYAYVYViLJOY i Sf YJNYYJrOOV iSJJ o•.F °J.. ::« 9�. 7o�19pa' tl9d« 3E3 '4A5RNY`•iifd /i3Sd9C.89C"+7�i6 Yf WOO i_Y }OfLiFM•J MONJiY` O LOYY YY YYpY O�(Ni VM `f �/ NU NIiMJJiV V. <ri OFiYiFMJ� eI.7`0` i Vf YyL •LNN u iYNSY • rfC VYH V iYN YfO+hVf «rM •JJM «ry •i'SSN if 5VV{yf]iyNYi iNfL fi`V MyjYYY MRJ�OeDYVtOt M;,V1 NY .i YfNfN yJYYFLRB8O •Ni J « Oi1i. YArD. 1�A: FFb« 4YVUVtl <LSlVV.iiY��NFiY'h�VSDY��•Ma Y„ YYNY DOOi1f1YONi<yffYN iO YYf f <VYMMOpifVVV�iNMp tO scsccecicccscssiieOLLLL •.LeLaLL a.Y.f .f rrwwNN »„NnA,,N 'IO FN• w= AF'• SROwPJw NN• MNwOj1 „ „wNNryOMM »wOOFO^NriNMMNJM N JM.IY^wMNNNNN^N YONNFNNNONY „MONNw NVONN• „.y NNNNM „N NN NNN VM • •M /1N SNMMNN•♦ NMyy Cp �wP 3�L VY� �00 •.FIY Or► YJ V ' v f1 •0 7 Y' w f \�Y Y• O• E• VI •O_ •f •i e NI M: M Y• N: O Ci Y• M• NNNONOOOOONNMOOONNO ♦OOOOIONO0000 OOONOO :p00000MMO +NONOVN000NOM00000 ♦N.Ii�Nwe ,v�vM •�MIwOY� ♦II�ONI +ONNOlyF . ON^O :O+ +NNwyr�N <y +FM+ �Ow�N <rNw� O F P NN �wwwNw A A V � V Jr }OyNw ♦N +MONOwN NI'N rNYwOyNw ♦w+NYNOw Y�AFFFr�FF�N• ••.1 ••.. yy��11ww ••��n F••�� +• + ♦I + +V +•II•• i wwNwywywyNyMw ~~~~~yrM.FiywywyYMyy�~� OwNwNwMNwNNNnMwNNwNNNwNNMNwwNNnwNwN Y VOOeeOVV N V Y Y • 00 y NF wry NiYN Y ♦ eM +f 00 Y • ♦ �OrO ► e ► \+ NN YN J . NwM1 f JwnYVYNYNNe • S_N N nNN F ewfo`L .Si ' \4 S Yom.`. ` �� ♦ eeNMNyyr.\.e'a rrfw SMl. Ali iJ� i1�� •f eeaOYJwNNws ti `` Y = ►ssVs Mw11I11 \OY +M��w ►e +h OO�JiSw�SAVw NOON`f�NVwYV2wfY Mf w OOtlewnO YYM YYfwO O ►`eN9 O► OV �wOOM.SNS10iVNrpl.OiNpOV � :N 301Y�f NYp NywwwOMi��MVYV��V�O�YNHp yV 4i ►JL,OV NMNMNMYN Y �V� Y�M+ O J VN IIIIIIIY p VOpJJI VOJiIOVO••O p ►J °n.°L°..°L1°1I "iiii eye dai .J. °. tsy: Yra�3_aH aze+ . YII�MJ�.i ii►JYV�f`N9 EVE��► YVJN►► ♦M + + + +N +w i.ia►ww rillw u��i�Cii.°�� <w< «f 3`333`33 J JJSJJ Y YYYYY NNYiIN MM ' E siiiiio u` r 'J N� N : NE�NiYN OiNM �H M. N.1 OV JiY „�f 14NMY < J �M . ww. iY••iSE UOV MF `:hEd�ll EEC VV`YVYYYYf <N >MpOiJfhVNO YiJyYil► :: d :Mdw9C•Jo•EL3p'S ►iJ•�fN ►YVYYiVO JJ J�J1J JJf OM >YNN�I/JSOY0000 Oi Vi •Y fppii ppyy� 3��3YYJfe�Jh�t�� ;•' »:M�:riNNiYM�iw� „ »40400MhF9firOYYi ii ► ►Y <•.N<VfiNY4 NNNNNNNNNMhhhhhME 'JiJii >! }iifiiMM N^^ NryNMrYMY1NNNVNONO!!lrNINOYNFMNN NNNwIOywONONNMyNNMOYhFNOOFN000Y I. H^= MM�VMNN :MryMN•IyN +YO ♦NN♦^MVM•.NNN N< VVV N O OV O 7 l/ . Original %2Qaliy! I ©# /\ ■ ■: � ;f|!kk] « #: ! <, «� ! A� ) © § /9fd} *` �. ■� ) �\ �§ \ �! ■! !/) f <!!! q'f lfl }\ ■! ; |! 65! - gam !!.,! !!!!! I � ' \ �) • >\ <.� f Original Poor Quarry _a a5� �- cc3s' -'- 4 "cc=- ❑s_c ? ?. _s =aq a 7,S = j U =ii E •= 1Fi'$38t95iFe1238 5 STia'�,YW� ? 9 a ^c 'a 2f� °5 & 3ED3aS8 *f�dPS Jul �R@? = A ^s $46F MW TIIS�LLSLTT Il9II q iiYqLS Y L SY S F =Y'JIL • I!= 9i p3#Hdi k k e f al n06 r ezv2F i ¢k 4 -c sZ -a s Y � ^ as LYYELS =CIB G SLESYY T i Yt [ t -TyYJ j 2f = f E066s£Ea�as s YiYELC g g�=§ ^ IITA�IISIIIIEIIS�t R TLSIISII T S TY Y G SnAz - y3i lEtE'£ =� iF£c tig a @� =e we s 4� 19 Rog 8 1 i� it ■eewaGWOrrG i - =--311 g ` h mm z SEP s !� =.•s. � � scgi� P � rcS c "sPS£?2P 9 pp [ ?a 'st!aslIIStII �$f 3xYS y eit _� ' BJL£ a y o o a 7 41 2 .� , o• s s s••• .4 s rt a y'Q I I Original Poor Quality 31 & e a a • -2 4 a. ^i y 3 .I •5 � G S A d: _ 5 a a _ g� E} agaS 31 & e a a • -2 4 y, Original poor Qualibj s t 1 �a � s 2 ;e r � C nE� C� r a _ _ n a: �t t Il 1 a� � s 2 rya r � C t Il original Poor QuG $ q S $ q 2` : A/� ; ! < ! e « Pqq# |Ga e e; ! � | ■ - - t: . � � . |(: : #E | 2 q § ` .>!,!,_! - ■!!!! |t!§ ! § §■ /� ;!!; ; ;l;�; _•_! |/) Mu | § ;..§ | . ■ | | | | | | | ■ ; | ; §!; | E !| | | � | ||| | � | )!t[:r!#!|: |!�| } [ |! | t ■I ||| | |! k � 0 3 } t {. ! . Quality Poor \ Ri •� ' i .| � ! . | : . � COPY__ .I.J 4 Yrti 1..IY Yr/rr4 �w AP/YIATSON IM AKOIPKK //YtAM UOPMU Tr OIrb1 J Abi1s /rrT CnN feT- I lmsr... Yd1.9A1/ N-11, �Y.�.. ....rte, �/w Tli L 1. TT/901 a OmCy /1 AI�./.d.f.1.1 Y p ea.. u9. � 1: : M Km)1 MA V CODO �]• Irk 2 KAMM u : ZAN= .T IrM ur«. or« rt\.15. rnTYSin 1 m101 M T/AIOACf10 a m UC frn l 11r. J Los S twwtw J Lw -IMLr W Yiw .,1 ,scdslc Aa.. Saa S, W Wtl C.A. Oa..I 10TK /11 .M1 M1l MIL .i YP.bIOM r.w r M� M1 L.nIR1 w/ J M P.btw J M FIm1•./. L.YwM Crn.l ilu IS PAM O' CA190f1wA Cw v Ifv�rclut f. \F 11 /M /^ F... ,.+, I ,H•n +.. 4� w..+ Yw..W .., .w r4 w w M n,.a • � r....r........_ Y....... w.. ..M........a.Y.._..w...,b.`Fa.. Yom. I . fa � .�/ . Yid Yw � r w�w...,,wR' W w F �v1.Y wr 4,�e14 W, .Y ,,,.a...Y• 1 AKIKAM YGf WK _– A/PUCAYMN •Y SlAMSMOR 13 /TA71 W UUIOMA Cr J M.a• ,r, ♦ .n �� �� ..a. �, Fr.. �... .I w,w lO r w w .�. w . w�„1. • Y R.�� .Yawww~ r�a.,I Far./�.� Y, w..Y•1 � Y ��. � �,. h�� �uw Y ` ter. w��^,i.. Y.iw l,ww�Frl�,br/Y,�w ./W �w..4 Y.wM w,.r. �M.{.•wrY .aa w � ~ir. / �4w � Y W YYw a.✓•w � �a M r Y .wlw w.� Y .,w� F Yr• Y, ,.M�wYF�a.r.4.4,wr Y..a F I I ANJTIifK 4(e.s 7fY fJv1 Jw Drperwl.f VKOJ/ Aft." p,_ _ ..+.4.. O rrJb9PR.A t✓"I: p i.ww✓tIM II VAb ,�' O}bM 111 �.� f I I I W IO �A =; t1031 U I» DlG'4 — �•�_j _ I I I I( I �, Q� I � . =1� tliG'S I. NEIGHBORHOOD 14ARKET 8880 Archibald Ave.. Ste.A Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91730 APN #209- 032 -42 Currently Zoned: Industrial Specific Plan Sub -Area Three/ General Industrial Zoning of Adjacent Property: North: Industrial Soecific Plan Sub -Area Three/ General Industrial South: Industrial Specific Plan Sub -Area Three b Four/ Genera, Industrial East: Industrial Specific Plan Sub -Area Seventeen /Law Residential/ Existing School Hest: Industrial Specific Plan Sub -Area Three/ General Industrial S. Ramirez 1 -9 -91 /-EJ w . w otc z 8 FM � COPY. _ ' ,_. rz AL.- —ti LtVVED — CITY Of RANCHD CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISIVN a� DEC 2 61990 _I 718;91m1BIP111213141516 1b, I' �00 O a° ca t0 h, 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I tw O.qv.... N AH.AOOr f..r.r Sm..rn VI quit rl «e.lb w SALE CJI¢fAL " I6..Mrap,Mh..y tll0.w — •rr••�• uita rLwx coiDir SaIS t °�''�tiw• logo rrierttr, f: w S. NANNA W AINIC.yrrM TT I..•t <,I M, CIAI'[t. r.t«1 A...A• l 1 Rolm w IWdaClpNpl R 11G 1ELLziu", J «. L. 1Tn Aty t 6600.m, aT t=W". wren _ 2rmvt. .. r. ArRWL HI.m 10 Apply .caw q:fmq t.u•J.. M.+ /c.a Ie.t.u[.nt ter 66060.m "t.d hlq -m 1 l.rdr r ba... -Mi. d lrrw 1 Aw.. 0-1 bQ7wi4�! a%1 Yl�rm .t 4 91110 S.n Mrn.Al. I' IOIAI ! a94.0 l NI•..r. liw.d. Le. Tm N COP 1yy.T Yit m L HtW AM.. MO..«6.. S1�6r.twdl..r '� n.'.... -I f. Ilwr rw..w 6wn er4Nd r.1JwTl AL Mw. rw .... •byN: wr J A. ti.Ya J Y AI.I.t. ... ro».. -ru• w.w . t... q. Io «.•...a...w.a+6 ,6.t b r«.6 pr r+w.gpErw.. I! .arM ...v... 1.1 6a .•) .orP ..rMM I. s«M 4w.M p..rw .0 M..1 i. rl•4a.. r . 4..w. d 161.Lr M.d r.W.... tsv wrn+Ywb+rrN r weA1a.JMAwAN. Y.nw Ccn.J Atl 11 STAR W C.WrorltA L...r W •�.. Dw�yt(ly /m��_ +� �.�..� ..s n•........+ .� ,.rte . AMUCAfiON BY TtAN11,11011 I1 Sun W JIIIOD0.1 c.•.,N N o.. M NO A`JN/.iw Thy TAw1 rr lg s Ur 0,1♦ AAw6ry [; t.uA.1..6q � rA.6wr r+.n ' ` , O ..�. 1bgIEI MYfU —S�—it�.Lc O br..i rwN_ --ldr .w..,.. Ro _ �' • r Zende.as Mexican Restaurant I `.�-Znnnll llrnTrT, IrCll laj I `= -:x OIIIIiO - ;,�I���l�r �!�i��� I ILLLlI@1111La �• �, �' � IItiIY'/ 41. .. �• L � � � ��� r—N _ w ZENDEJAS MEXICAN RESTAURANT 7945 Vineyard Ave.,Ste. D -7 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 APHO 208- 101 -11 Currently Zoned: Commercial- Foothill Specific Plan Sub -Area Two Zoning of Adjacent °roperty: North: Low 'tedium/ Low Residential South: Medium Residential East Commercial- Foothill Specific Plan S6 —Area One Nest Commercial- Foothill Snecific Plan Sub -Area Two/ Low Residential S. Ramirez 17 1 -10 -91 t` CITY OF RANCHO CUCA 1ONGA STAFF REPORT FOATE-January 16, 1991 TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: City Council and City Manager Paul A. Rougeau, Acting Deputy City Engineer Judy Acosta, Engineering Technician h'Y M Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for DR 88 -36, located on the south side of Arrow Route and west of Milliken Avenue, submitted by D'Donnell, Armstrong, Brigham and Partners REC00901DATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution ordering Ye e annexation of DR 88 -36 to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS OR 88 -36, located on the south side of Arrow Route and west of Milliken Avenue, is Parcel 17 of Parcel Map 11891, w'nich was approved by City Council and annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Ligyhting Maintenance District Iks. 1 and 6 on July 5, 1989. As part of the conditfons of approval for DR 68 -36, the developer was required to install additional landscaping improvements. Those improvements must now be annexed to the work program for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3. Attached is the resolution to be adopted by the City Council to complete this annexation. Respectfully submiitteedd,,J PAR:Jf%A:dlw 4 4 ' ` /[�/ /�� �O (� -IV~ Attachment N ! RESOLUTION NO. 91- O/ 3 A RESOLUTION OF Tn CITY COUNC`_L OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSLAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRI47 NO. 3 FOR OR 88 -36 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of kaecho Cucamonga. California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terns of the 'Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972', beingg Division 15, .. Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Crltfarnta, said spen:fal maintenance district known and designated as Landscrpe Eaintenance District No. 3, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Nain_anance District "); and fr WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of ",hapter 2 of the •Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972' authorize the annexation of additional territory to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council is desirous to take proceedings to annex the property described on Exhibit 'A' attached hereto ane. incorporated herein by this referenced to the Maintenance District; and WHEREAS, ail of the owners of property within the territory proposed to be annexed to the Maintenance District have filed with the City Clerk their written consent to the proposed annexattai without notice and hearing or filing of on Engineer's 'Report ". NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Thit the above recitals are all tnie and correct. SECTION 2: That this legislative bot* hereby orders the annexation of the proper as shown in Exhibit 'A' and the work program areas as descrfbed in Exhibit 'B' attached hereto to the Maintenance District. SECTION 3: That all future proceedings of the Maintenance District, including Me Ny of all assessments, shall be applicable to the territory annexed hereunder. 11. �9 EMBIT W r ASSESSMEN'i DIAGRAM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 /C /L. ARROW ROUTE W .114 ii 13. 21 ►� Il.a!• 107 17.777 /. ►:A. xi ►C4 x3 .r1 r tear► ' SITE __ 'I1kP �GOIOlA1D►l'1IJE WI%T • •. • • •. • • e srex .T 71t&& MA%w • CUTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO `+ �RfiB �� STATE OF CALIFORNIA • : iii.:77 ►a a ►a tx ran ►et to ►a s • 7.w 177 340 a.74 Ir 7.p7 177 a.77i Is• • • • 2- A w wu • • ►CL 14 • � a.lu An Q ►CL a • T f.er w • !�I• ►q. as ►CL is • 2.217 107 u.m a• ►CL 4 ; �- r.r1107: 3i ►CL is 1.714 Iq ►CL 0 . ►CL 10 ►CL 20 I.Aww /0•• 4741 b a I 7.0771.7 • POL • • ►el t7 • �� 1.711 C._d1• .� •••.• •.•. •• 1 7741, W .114 ii 13. 21 ►� Il.a!• 107 17.777 /. ►:A. xi ►C4 x3 .r1 r tear► ' SITE __ 'I1kP �GOIOlA1D►l'1IJE WI%T • •. • • •. • • e srex .T 71t&& MA%w • CUTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO `+ �RfiB �� STATE OF CALIFORNIA I EXHIBIT '8' PROJECT NAME: DR 88 -36 (pcl 17 of PH 11891) STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. of L s to be Annexed District No. zz,uuu b_ 1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT Cciminity Turf Ground Cover Trees District No Street Naar EQuest.Trail So, ft. Sy. ft. Ea. 3 Jersey Blvd. - -- - -- - -- 18 Milliken Ave. - -- - -- - -- 22 Arrow Ruute - -- - -- - -- 9 Parcel Mao 11891 was annexed to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Mos. 1 and 6 on July 5, 1989. This annexation is to annex street trees to the work program for Lsndscape Maintenance District No. 3 only. JAA:1 /16/91 3 t i r �r w DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUB-JECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGi, "TAFF REPORT January 16, 1990 U City Louncll and City Manager Paul 1 Rougeau, Acting Deputy Lily Engines - Judy Acosta, Engineering Technician Acceptance of Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement from Laszlo and Erzsebeth Vass for a single family residence, located at 6609 Hellman Avenue REC0MIC1mATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt tha attached resolution accepting the subject Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement and causing the same to record. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The developers Laszlo and Erzsebeth Vass requested a building psrmit for a single family residence located between 19t,1 Street and Monte Vista (6809 Hellman Avenue). Street improvements are a condition of issuing the building permit. The City does not require tafd improvements to be built at this time. Nix Development, adjaccat to this Single Family Resident, will be constructing extensire street improvements within Hellman Avenue, including the portion adjacent to the Vass's property (Exhibit 'B'). Therefore, the developers have submitted a Rohl Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for the construclgion of the improvements on the east side of Hellman Avenue adjacent to their property. A copy of the Agreement is available in the City Clerk'; office. Respectfully submitted, PAR:JAA:diw Attachment 10� "gM fpl.Fl S.�C1_tf L IP M 3, Q � G I y I I/K lOK �C r r wK r • I • 1 1 • I 6809 11A 4 cl• rnKN `"0 i w Krr•. I 34 37• I�I [1[1I I�I k Mryry ■ ■ O R1IPp��AfyVf1�./�CUCAWWQA � LIEN Q+?,p7LyP - VAiS ?•':. GI lING DiVISM 7rnm 6809 HQ.LMAN AVENUE t; EXFMEM 'A' A Ir :3 To: Dan James, Head of Plan Checking Regardings Street improvement of 6609 Hellman Ave I am presently completing construction of my home at the above address. As normally required to attain a building permit. I was bonded for street improvement to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Since my bonding for areet improvement, His Developement Corporation has gainad owrership of surrounding buildable property including a portion that originally belonged to me. As part of the atlas agreement with Nix Developement Corporation, they would assume resposibillty for the street Improvement that I had been originally borded for Presently, Mix :)evelpoeNant Cr,rporatlon is in the process of developing the property around my home, including a major overall improvement planted for Hellman Ave from 19t:i street to Monte Vista. Their overall engineering plans not only adequately meet requirements, but vili provide and insure a consistence In such as drainage, curb, gutter, pavement and under- ground utilities to create a morn unified apperance along Hellman Ave Till this can ha exe:uted I would like to gain a permit to occupy my home regardless of the delay to the street improvements that I had been bonded for City Engineering has informed me that to acheive this I should request that my street improvement bond be changed rather to a lean band. Herein I request from City Engineering to change the status of my bonding to a lean bond Thark You, Laszlo Vase ) �• Iof 2 M i HIX DEVEL0Ph1ENF CORP. December 11, 1990 If Mr. .Toe Stofa i Engineering Division CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOHGA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: 6809 Hallman Avenue, Vass Dear Hr. Stofa: we will be completing the street improvements and utility undargrounding on the east side of Hellman Avenue, along the frantags of the above referenced property, as conditioned in our recently approved tentative tract 14192. As we underatand the condition, these improvements must be complete prior to any construction on our model complex. Thereforo they will be done an soon as we ara ready to start the project which at this point we anticipate as summer 1991. These improvementn are also protected by a bond in our name as a part of the conditions for Parcel Map 12218. As the construction of these improvements are already guaranteed we feel it would be appropriate to release Mr. Vass of his „:h obligation to complet4, them. Please do not hesitate to contact no if I can provide any further information regarding this matter. Si proly, v � BobJf }Y/ er General Manager cc: Laslo Vass EXHIBIT "B" , 2 of 2 U 437 South Cahrxt Avenue • Suite 3 0 Set [XM& , CW0Mie 91 773 • (714) 5993467 • FAX (714) 59I %P6.0*' n r[�� Li l ��.4 . �. i w� r..'�y.,. . C✓yy w • vp4' • RESOLUTION No. q%' 01V A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. C.41IFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL 'PROPERTY NS�O AHEE F�ZIERZSEBEVASS AND HRIZINGTHEHAYORAND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAMEt WHEM4S, the City"Couneil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance Ho. 58 on February 21, 1979 ' to establish requirements, for construction of public improvements 1n to with building permit issuance; and WHEREAS, Installation of missing off -sfte street improvements adjacent to the property to be developed established as prerequisites to issuance of building permit for 6209 Hellman Avenue has been met by entry into a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement by Laszlo Ind Erzsbeth Vass. NOW. COUNCIL T rovoracCILLIFORNIAHEREBY IT-SOLVES to r ptsaid Real Property Icpeoentt Contract and Lien Agreement, authorizes the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clark to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California, MR 1' E`' t• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: City Council and City Manager FROM: Paul A. Rougeau, Acting Deputy 'ity Engineer BY: Dan Jams, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Approval of an Agreement with the S.n Bernardino Country Flood Control District for Day Creek Phase 38 improvements from Base Line Road to I -15, just south of Arrow Route, and completion of other related Day Creek facilities, to be funded by San Bernardino County Flood Control District with the remaining $6.4 million from the Bureau of Reclamation loan funds and City Redevelopp�meent Agency Regional Facilities Fund 11 not to exceed $3.0 millioe It is recommended that the City Council approve the subject contract with the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and authorize the Mayor to execute the same. BACKGRDUNO /ANALYSIS The Day Creek construction and administration is being funded by the City from the proceeds of the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District No. 84 -1, from a portion of the RDA tax increment and a loon from the Federal Bureau of Reclamation. The construction cost for Phase 3B will utilize the remaining funds of $6.4 pillion from the Bureau loan first then from the City's RDA Regional Facilities Fund 11, not to exceed $3.0 million. The contract for Phase 3B construction is scheduled to be awarded by the County Board of Supervisors in February, 1991. The subject agreement provides a mechanism for the County to proceed with the completion of the Day Creek project. As well As providing for the completion of the Z:�, Creek project the subject agreement also provides for the completion of othe- pro,'ect related items which were either inadvertently not constructed or intentionally deferred to the last phase of construction. These items include: 1. Environmental mitigation 2 Dust control mitigation 3. Rochester Avenue south of Highland along Day Creek Basin, improvements for proper access to basin. Respectfully submitted, PAR:W:dlw 7 r r {� 01 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG.,. STAFF REPORT January 16, 1991 City Council and City Mbnager Paul A. Rougeau, Acting 0eputy City Engineer Henry Nurakoshf, Associate Civil Engineer Approval of Cooperative Agreement He. 8 -719 with Caltrans for the improvement of 19th Street from Carnelian Street to Arethvst Street. A refundable deposit of $30,000 will be required, to be funded from capital Improvements Account lie. 22 -4637 -8745 It is recommended thst Cooperative Agreement No. 8 -719 with Caltrans for the improvement of 19th Street from Carnelian Street to Amethyst Street be approved. A refundable deposit of $30,000 w111 be required, to be funded from Capital Improvements Account No. 22 -4637 -8745. BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS This agreement is & CarnellansStrreet to Amethy t Street which hasvb entapproved by the City Council and for which design and right -of -ray work is underway. The project is entirely City funded, but Caltrans wilt provide contract s a►arded within five Yeat s Ofathe date Ofvthedagreement. Upon award of a construction contract, the above - mentioned $30,000 de review and checking will be refunded. Posit for Caltrans has been providing review of the work on this project and nas returned comments on the Project Report. Considerable guidance has been given to the City's consultant on engineering and design and such pla;,t. are progressing 'ward completion. Respectfully "Witted Linda Daniels, Deputy City Hanager RESOLUTION NO. q%'0/5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8 -719 WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF 19TH STREET FROM g CARNELIAN STREET TO /)EMST STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE SIGNING THEREOF BY THE MAYOR WHEREAS, the best interests of the City will be serviced by the Improvement of 19th Street from Carnelian Street to Amethyst Street; and and WHEREAS, such improvement has been authorized by the City Council; WHEREAS, a Cooperative Agreement with the Department of Transportation is necessary for obtaining final approval of plans and specification for the work on State property. SECTION 1: The City Council of the City of Rae ho Cucamonga. Cal iforn a, oes ereby resolve that Cooperative Agreement No. 8 -719 with the California Department of Transportation for the improvement of 19th Street from Carnelian Street to Amethyst Street is approved. sign said reeeent It Is the resolved the Mayor is authorized to SECTION 3: It is further resolved that the Mayor is authorized to sign any amen n s) to said agreement on behalf of the City Council. -J9 I a:. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: 1 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT January IE, 1991 v City Council and City Manager v Paul A Rougeau, Acting Deputy City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector It� Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13051 located on the northeast corner of Wilson Avenue and Canistel Avenue submitted by Pacific International Development. RECOMMcIOATION It is reco®ended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. ANALYSIS /BACKGROUND Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the ublic improvements for Tract 13851 were approved by the City Council on January 3, 1990, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $1,042,000.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 521,000.00 The developer, Pacific International Development, is requesting approval of a 12 -month extension on said improvement agreement. Coplie of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectfully submitted, PAR•'%:ly 1�' " / a-lyAA � !/ Attachaents E 10 4 PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. 4 A SWYOVy d IMOnG re04afRUCI10,/ LO. g0. December 13, 1990 City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 Attn: Steve M. Gilliland RSr Request for extension of Developer Agreement with Pacific International Development, Inc.,Tract 13651 Gentleman; In accordance with your instructions please find attached herewith three (3) fully executed request for improvement extension forms and a check in the amount of $251.00 for processing the extension. In addition please find one copy of our marketing report for further reference. Pacific International Development, Inc. request a one year extension of our agreement as a result of our decision to temporarily place the project on hold . As you are aware there has been a substantial slowdown in the housing market, the most seriously affected being the upscale, high end homes which we proposed. We have included excerpts from our marketing report prepared by The Meyer* Group , which recommends delaying the development until late 1991, a recommendation we concur with. To date, we have completed all grading, storm drain work, all underground utilities , 90% of our curb and gutter, and all necessary precautions have been taken to prevent both wind and storm erosion. We are hopeful a turp in the market will occur in the third quarter of 91 and the balance of the improvements completed by years end. In closing if we can be of any assistance or answer any further questions please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Pacific International Development, Inc �lLU.H Daniel Eau Vice President 3l 2940 fiftW Emptra Dtid. &OA 130, CnWk% CA 9,764 Tao (714) 945-0095, Fax (714) 948-3002 - , 4 G' RESOLUTION No. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IXPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEKNT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13851 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Isprovement Agreement Extension executed on January 16, 1591, by Pacific Insrnationai Development as developer, for the improvement of public rfgnt- ot•way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and geticrally located at the northeast corner of Wilson Avenue and Canistel Avenue; am; MIEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Imprevems.• Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunctir with the development of said Tract 13851; and Wi LEAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied iy good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified In said Imps vement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayer is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 3�- E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPO' - DATE: January 16, 1991 ( 1 TO: City Council and 611y Manager L� FROM: Paul Rougeau, Acting Deputy City Engineer 1 BY: Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspectors I SUBJECT: Acceptance of improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of I Completion for DR 87 -19 and DR 87 -20, located on the northeast corner of 6th Street and Hermosa Atenue gECOKVMTIOM: The raqufred street improvements for OR 87 -19 and DR 87 -20 havt been completed tr in acceptable manner, and it is recommended th!: City Cocccll accept sc.id improvements, authorize the Deputy City Enyyinaer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize t,- City C1erK to mile3se the Faithful Performance Bonds in the mounts c- $352,000 anc $6,6OG, respectively. BACKGROUND /AM .31S OR 87 -19 and OR d7 -20 - located on the northeast corner of ;th Street and Hermosa Avenue DEVELOPER: Indumar Irvestments, Inc. 4070 E. La Palma, Suite 0 Anaheim, CA 92807 Release: Faithful Performance Bonds (Street) $352,000 and $6,600 Respectfully submitted, PAR:SMG sd Attachment .. - .'... v.. 33 1� RESOLUTION NO. y1 -011 CIkCAMONGAtOCALIFORNIACIACCEPTINGLTHE UEL C MOVEMENTS FOR OR 87 -19 AND OR 87 -20 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE W= ap 87 -20 havebeonscomplotodstou the osat satisfaction of he Deputy City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. yy hereby resolves, that the work 1s hereby accepted and the CityhEngi eernis authorized to sign and file a Notice San Bernardino County. of Completion with the County Recorder of _ —_ _ '�^" .ti. ^: a fit• _ _ ., iCC;�^+Y }��� �c " A a i I"' :- DATE: TO: FROM: BT: SUBJECT: t..:1 j CITY OF RANCHO CUCAhIONGA STAFF REPORT January 16, 1991 C1 City Council and City Manager U Paul A. Rougeau, Acting Deputy City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 13027 located or. the southwest corner of Etiwenda Avenue and Highland Avenue It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background /Analysis The required ane year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects to materials and workmanship. DEVELOPER: The William Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenue, Suite B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Release: Hat .nonce Guarantee Bond (Street) $93,200.00 Respectfully submitted, PAR:SMG:dlw .&5- � 9 c ■r DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT January 16, 1991 C1 City Council and City Manager U Paul A. Rougeau, Acting Deputy City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspecto Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 13052 located on the north side of Base Line Road between Ettwanda Avenue and Victoria Park Lane RECOMMENDATION: It is recomeended that the City Counetl authorize the City Clerk to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background /Analysis The required one year maintenance period has ended and the street improvements remain free fray defects in materiais and workmanship. DEVELOPER: The William Lyon Company 8540 Archibald Avenua, Suite B Rancho Cucaaagna, CA 91730 Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $ 9,500 Base Line Improvements 19,000 oft -site 101,200 on -site Respectfully submitted, IagA�wa.v- PAR:SMG:dlw y ( a Wi 3J.wr DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF' REPORT January 16, 1991 City Council and City Manager Paul A. Rougeau, Acting Deputy City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Pubilc Works Inspect Release of Maintenance Bond for Tract 13475 located on the northeast corner of Ramona Avenue and Church Street RECO1f. MATIOk: It is recoamendod that the City Council author'ze the City Clark to release the Maintenance Guarantee Bonds Background /Analysts The raqulred one year swintanance period has ended and the street improvements remain free from defects in materials and uvrkeanshlp. DEVELOP &Z: WDS Development 5206 Benito Street 1101 Montclair, CA 91763 Release: Mainterance Guarantee Bond (Street) $47,000 Respectfully submit /t�eedd,��%/% PAR:SMG:dlw 37 ` n M� - CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.NfONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager .ROM: Jerry B. FulWood, Deputy City Manager BY: Diane 04'aal, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: CITY -AIDE MANDATORY RBYUSD COLLLCTIox EF)ECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1992 R000mindation It is recommended that the ordinance amending Section 8.17.260 of Chapter 8.17 and Section 9.19.280 of Chapter 6.19 both of Title 8 of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code adding provisions requiring payment for refuso collection services be approved. Background The proposed amendment to the City's Refuse Ordinance would institute mandatory refuse collection city -wide effective 7anuary 1, 1992. .ae Environmental Management Commission was presented with the Draft Mandatory Refuse Collection Ordinance at ite September 27, 1990 meeting. The Draft Ordinance was shared with the Chamber's Governmental Relations Committee at Its October 2, 1990 meeting, and a public hearing was hold at the Environmental Management Commission's November, 1990 meeting. This ordinance will assist with implementing a City -wide curbside recycling program in the future. Respectfully submitted, erry B. Fulwood Deputy City Manager JBP /tlr DO:017 38" t r'■ cmnaw 7: no. 0 AV cPEMW= OF 711E aay 000'' . of = CT1Y OF RANCID C<7C11't.'M' SEL ORL2it OMI ANI3D Mh 8.17.280 OF CLAP= 8.1'/ AND SECTION 0.19.280 OF C}NPXM 8.19, BOlii OF TTTEZ 8 OF MM RANGED CUC&40tr;A EII icn)AL OCOE, AMIlO PEDVISICMS 'M7Jn M PAYMENT EM RUM CUIIJCIR'Si SERVICES A. Recital . each inllvidal� City of Rands CU® m vm �erntly i oes not require that residence, mmr.nria or industrial eatablialsuart lay for trash collection servi.cnv. Ibis may cause the ral-COnctim of refuse material to occur within the City. (11) ge City Council has found and determined that the periodic collection of refuse and rubbish from all residences, oonnotcial and industrial further establishments will benefit all 0=4mnts and residents of tbo City within the lade for the health, safety and welfare of all persons City. oxiarrxd. (1111 All legal PrerOTdsitee to the adoption Of this Ordinance have ordl NON, 7EIFRrMO, tha City nxscil fol1cwe: hereby ordain as of the City of Rarucho Cucamonga does above. SD=CN 1: In 011 respects as set forth in the Rocitals, Section A, 0=0 2: gat SWUM 8.17.280 of Chapter 8.17 of Title 8 of the follows: RWXho Cucamonga KInici1?3l Codo, is amended to read, in words and figures, as "A. Coiloction (large. A charge for the collection of refuse _ o each residential unit. 7ho ams nt of such or es person h in control and canWU from time to time by the Permitter approval fixed by resolution of the City Council. A carpe so fixed doll be a civil the residtiall unit City too which the collection servica t f m available. go City Council has found and determined that the periodic colleo- ticn of refuse and rubbish from all residential units bemfits all and Occuoanta and residents Of the City, Provides far the health, safety Persons in the City and, therefore, all such 3q Oalimuxm lto. Page 2 d� for owners � limblo for the payment of collection service avails thcosalvea of sidix collection t eJW such or cry Co lloctia� s ca foes be p r aid sdmU or not r4�t that mxh 1, ,h alf and be enforceable affective Jatvaryservl,iO°1992. "B. Rate Adjusbxnts. All reVisicre ord Barges levied by PDXIaLttOO m'Ot to the city peril for xaviqu ty�3 action public hearing upon at Imat tenon of the City cram.,( oto OR=oved by permittee.4 ten (10) days mri,,tm r,-tica to Pznal vc MMiclpal �, Is ametxiod to read, 8.19 of Title D of the read. in wards aryl figures, as "8,14,g¢Q i�yj� fors ++.v "A. Coll shall be ia{oaeddbbmt}y pormittA.os� Ier the colloctlm OL riallysq Of each cmnm,=W d=Vm Mall be ficr after approml by �_�od fr'om time to time � Pao�at0f such fixed stall boa civil debt due and the City 03.r . 710 from the owmr Cr person in control off t0 the City or permitteo cir �1 to which LM collection setvl1ce Is redo avai)nh171e Per collection reRrso and finds and datsr'm vas that the irdu0trtal benefits all ci n cm=wc i or city, P ovlden for the health residents at the %elfare of an qmsons in such cimstablWment are cod� rl: f erg or Meow in of Provided for herein u r Lor th0 PaYOent of collection eecrice Persen in mrJnt that collection themselves L� 1m collection service. Ue 1992. utilized shall �m0 and be enforceable ff w J mxh Gm O, "D' ate Adjustments. All rsvisions and darges levied and m,er b0 vod bytod o the City Cotar:il for review and action Wblic neuri,ga ,q, a�'l,co or the city Council following a Permlttoo." (10) days written notice to the M=1M 4: Penalty for Violation. parpneraPnf A. �L��• It ehail be . any of the p of thisvipp �a� Provision to lai1 to o�niy vi.th Any perem, firm, partnership, or Io CzAinance l.o. •k. rage 3 OOrPa¢ati� vioa�sta].tabe odotac� Cba`� or failing to oapl }• witn corro' of DO ($1,000.00 ,rMll8��lU1a I1Dt paw both such fine and siassii tt g r3 six (6) mmnths, of by ay or any portion U> Wtof d ring Vach aani vl�olatimfop A tcc a8P� X19 in �P=ticn and s all born ontIed suxh of the Person, tlt�, Qapt�. PUnis+ able thY for as 1' of tills p antra evill e i l4nilsha�x evio times �an}abefte Prwtsias cteion, or u"n � for. Pnalie abort P� vwnt by law far tM ahx+tement of ssch that, ohau Mw P�iaion �cil of the City of Iterrho Cugy a declax� Crtiiitatanoa bo renderod or sectim, Pera9= 'aidli sentence or txnd of bf any fatal of ltamlld this oapatent Provisions on or by raa`g`r of °tt actim in a cast remaininj oniin,'nco shall rcvnin in full f' ' atdl ��ticn, the and atPect. : � Myer shall MlinsnCe and the CS shall cause the save to be Plb}Wls'IU� t ty perk 9P saga at least ace in the Ioltuw Vel lev tail] Pt�� (�) de= aft' its 4onatal aittulation -- _.�.._.� circulated in the City oYRarrt � tha City of qut arP� ibr of C imarp, Gtlifornfy. ' and 41 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT f _ DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Brad Puller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: APPEAL OF VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY encT�ng the residential subdivision and design sreview of 328 condominium units on 20.15 acres of land in the Medium (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium -Nigh (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) Residential districts within the Victoria Planned Community, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - API 227- 691-01. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City ouneil receive all Pu c tes dI on the appeal of the Vesting Tentative Tract. If after receivindy input on the hpreposed development, the Council concurs with then attached Resolutionsbof t DeniallanforgtheaVesting ,Tentative a adoption cct Map and Design Review, thereof, would be appropriate BACKGROUND: On November 14, 1990, after several public hearings, numerous neighborhood meetings and a siderablepubli testimon y she ue Planning Commission recommended denial of Vesting Tentative Tract Map 14630. At that meeting, several concerns were voiced by members of the immediate neighborhood and Commission members. They can generally be grouped as follows: 1. Land use conflicts with adjacent existing and future single family residential development; 2 The architecture and site plan design relative to its location (across the street from the future C,.-tral Park). Other general concerns such as school iv . ction, density, for sale versus rental product, crime, and traf Pere mentioned previously during the public hearing process. Pleasa refer to the attached Staff Report dated November 14, 1990, for further discussion of these issues. attached decision edReso1 tions of Denial on Ndvem9 � 5 her 8,1990,athe applicant filed an appeal to allow the City Council to coni.der the project as proposed. ,I k '{ CITY COUNXIL STAFF REPORT APPEAL OF YTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY January 16, 1991 Page Z ANALYSIS: A. Land Use Conflicts: Immediately adjacent to and east of the propose evi eTopment, single family detached residences era being propposed (Tract 13753). The Development nnde (Section 17.0D.050(f) generally requires a buffer, whether I be walls, landscaping, open space, transition of less intense unit types, land use conflicts thereof withovarying landiuses.poInnmost cases, the Planning' Commission policy has been to require the developer of the more intense land use to provide the buffer. However, in this specific case, the developer of Tract 13753 was required to construct a 6 -foot high slumpstone wall along shared property lines. To address the land use transition question, the developer of the proposed project was providing a minimum 15 -foot wide landscape buffer with plantings of IS_ gallon size Cypress and Pine trees. At the ie , CO"miSSIOn plc hearing, Commission felt after reviewigthe latestinaseriesf modified site and landscape plans, that the combination of the existing 6 -foot high slumpstone wall, a 1S -fo0t minimum landscape setback, and perimeter drive aisle with garages 'did not satisfactorily address a Compatible land use transition of unit type and density from adjacent single family detached residences. Furthermore, the Commission determined that since the stacked, attached unit type is not consistent with development typically approved in the Medium Residential zone (the northern half of the project), the project as designed does not resolve the land use compatibility issue. 0. Can atlbtitt oP Architectural and Site Plan Oesf n: The issue ma or a me issues that were m a camp a en o many specific design ents toned during the entire development review process Please refer to Section °0" of the November 14, 1990 Planning Commission Staff Report for a list of the unresolved issues. The net result of these issues was an overall concern that the architectural and site plan designs were not of sufficient quality to be looted immediately across the street from the future Central Park structures such as the Library and Performing Arts building. From an architectural standpoint, the Ceenission felt that the overall appearance of the buildings was net compatible with, and of the same quality as, the future cultural facilities across Milliken Avenue. The major site plan concerns includeO a lack of amenities and common open space, no density transition, between the north and south sectors of the project (Medium to Medium -High Residential) and the design encouraged mid -block pedestrian crossing to Central Park, across Milliken Avenue, a major arterial street its f e� c' x i; i i D� CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT APPEAL OF Vii 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY January 16, 1991 Page 3 Given the numerous unresolved design concerns, the Planiml Commission determined that the project did not create a project consistent with the goals of the Victoria Planned Community. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as r public hearing in THFTM-5-6-Tal ley Daily Bulletin nevspaper, the property has beeif theted, anT notices were sent io ail property owners within 300 feet of developer has site c conducted se eral neighborhood area. Th'i ng residents (see attached Staff Reports). ResP f y su' d /Bra' r City Planner BB: SH /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter of Appeal Exhibit "B" - I.ctters from Residents Exhibit "C" - Planning Commissin Staff Reports Planing Cca►ission Minutes City Council Resolution of Dental of VTT 14630 City Council Resolution of Denial of OR for VTT 14630 0:1 a� era 3•• -, MCOLM PROPX"r COMpAJ" h'ovem City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE: Environmental Accesnaent and Veshog Tentative °tract No. 14630 Dear City Clerk: Enclosed please find our check for $126.00 in payment for the appea! fee on the above referenced tract Tho appeal is beinS filed based upon the planning COmmis;lOo vote )f November 14, 1990, Oiemby dwralog the AMUcadon denied. Your prompt rctioa ant ism h appreciated, scheduling our sP4 nce before the City Council on die January 16, 1991 date If you have any questions. f can be contacted s. 6191412.5911. Thank you agaht. Sincerely, LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY N.C. INC. Martin W Garrick t Director of Development MWO488 Enclosure 4331 tJ JOLk VLjj@M chive S e.2'b & f ,q Garemu 93132 (alt) �J3.191I PAX ( @19J .15 lea? '` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSICN, .y THIS LETTER IS TO ADDUESS THE PROPOSED BUILDING OF APARTMENT BUILDINGS ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AND BASELINE. t I HAVE BEEN EMPLOYED AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FOR A MAJOR POLICE DEPARTMENT IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY FOR THE PAST FOURTEEN YEARS WITH REG D TO MY PAST EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE, I RAISE THE FOLLC"ING CONCERNS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. TO ALLOW RENTAL UNITS TO BE BUILT ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED CITY 55 ACRE PARK WOULD JEOPARDIZE THE SAFETY OF THE PARK IT WOULD PRESENT A LAW ENFORCEMENT PROBLEM NOT ONLY TO THE PARK. BUT ALSO TO THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS PAHn, NOTORIOUSLY ATTRACT \ MYRIAD OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PROBL3MS. DRUGS, ASSAULTS, SEX CRIMES. AND THEl T.S COMMONLY PLAGUE THE PARKS OF COMMUNITIES. WITH RENTAL UNITS LOCATED ACRjS9 THE STREET, THESE PROBLEMS WOULD INCREASE DRAMATICALLY INNER CITY GANGS ARE SPREADING THEIR DRUG ORGANIZATIONS NOT ONLY TO CITIES OUTSIDE OF LOS ANGELES, BUT ALSO TO OThER STATES. HAVING NON -OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING IN SUCH A VULNERABLE SITE WOULD ENCOURAGE SUCH AN ENCROACHMENT. ONCE ESTABLISHED, THIS TREND WOULD CREATE A SPREADING NEGATIVE IMPACT THAT WOULD BE DIFFICULT IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO CORRECT. WITH THE CAREFUL PLANNING THAT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRLTED IN THE PLANNING OF A POSITIVE COMMUNITY, DON'T JEOPARDIZE THIS FINE COMMUNITY IN SUCH A SENSITIVE AREA. :i I DUE TO A TIME CONFLICT WITH MY WORK SCHEDULE, I Aft UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETINO ON WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 14TH. I HOPE THE CONCERN, I RAISED WILL HA"E IMPACT ON THE BOARD TO NOT GRANT PERNI7SION FOR THE CON41'RUCTION OF RENTAL AT THIS LOCATION. 47 SINCERELY, PAUL HENRY 11482 GENOVA ROAD RANCHO CUCAXONGA PHONE (714) 944 -8543 ,7t " l .4 ,j_ i %ovember 13. 1990 Planning Division Citv of Rancho Cucamonga P O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission of Rancho Cucamonga: 1 - Itr- GEI TrYOP RMfMJ J MM' a www n&"*h*. 1�V ls'199fi , 7 g191IN141111121314131t In response to your Notice of Public Hea= ng and /or, Environmental Notice, received on October 22. 1390. 1 thank you for keeping me abreast of the public meeting and f input on November 14, 1990. I' I have Just moved here after owning a home in Walnut for 24 rears, in 1985 Walnut only had 300 people and it was still considered -Country". When I moved here I thought I was moving into the same type of community. I've since learned to my deepest regrets, that there is too much density, there's alot of crime. In the Cul -de -sac where I live, a truck was stolen out of the drive way across the street and the perpetrators tried to Creak intc the garage next to that home when everyone vas home. The person behind me fired a hots into the air when school children were coming tome. Helicopters hovered for almost half an hour on the next block looking for a suspect: and more robbe.ies right here, within blocks of my home. I was warned by my neighbors not to go .fogging, as another neighbor had been accosted in his awn garage. lY I am a single person and I took all of my money and invested it in a now home, in what I thought was going to he the perfect place to build another investment before I retire, So fer, it looks like I live in a ghetto, or surrounded by them. The traffic going to work points to the fact that this area is way over built. Now you want to approve the development of 336 condominium units. Something is seriously wrong. I resent that I wan not aware of the project prior to closing of escrow. I„waited for n year and z half while my home was being built and no one made me aware of this situation. I drive 41 miles one way to work, I want to be able to come home and relax and not worry about my house being robbed or the property value decreasing. A moratorium on all buildings except the foothill freeway and /or shopping mall should be impcsed, if you mu at build anything on the property in Suestion, why not build a Senior Citizens Complex for couples 55 and over, like Laguna Hills Leisure World. Let's get come class around here, we've got a good start, let's keep it that way. I will be out of tows on business that day but you can bet that I'll be there if my plane gels back on auheduie. %ery sincerely yours, Frances R. Sweigar s �� 1•f N. 'iii i a• _ .i� ;" � .•W ('."�� . a. ■i DATE: TO: FROM BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT a i November 28, 1990 ' Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Steve Hayes, Associate Planner RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14630 - Resolutions for a en a of-a es ng en a ve rac Map and design review for the developeent -of 328 condominium units on 20.15 rcres of land in the Medium -Nigh Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per acre), in the Victoria Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APF: 227- 691 -01. I. BACKGROUND: On November 14, 1990, the Planning Comm'ssion reconsf'e—red the above referenced project. After considerable public tnstimcny and Commission discussion, the Planning Comission recommended denial of the Vesting Tentative Tract Hap and related Design Review and directed staff to prepare Resolutions of Denial for the project. 11. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Co"fsslon a op a a, ached Resolutions of Dental for Vesting Tentative Tract 14630 and the Design Review tnereof. R ully submit , ��- rad Buller City Planner BB: SP. /jfs Attachments: Resolution of Denial for Vesting Tentative Tract 14630 Resolution of Denial for Design Review for Vesting Tentative Tract 14630 M •n t :■ `1 m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 28, 1990 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning CoPrOssion FROM: Brad Puller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR YESTIVG TENTATIVE TRACT 14630 - LINCOLN FROFERIT CRIPMT - Resolutions for We aenlal of a e� swing %n a ve roc Map and design review for the development of 328 condominium units on 20.15 acres of land in the Medium -High Residential District (14 -24 deelling units per acre), in the Pictovia Planned Community, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227- 691 -01. I BACKGROUND: On November 14, 1990, the Planning Commission recon�d the above referenced project. After considerable public testimony and Commission discussion, ttie Planning Comaission recommended denial of the Vesting Tentative Tract Map and related Design Raviro and directed staff to prepare Resolutions of Denial for the project. I1. RECCMMENDATICN: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission a. op e a ached Resolutions of Denial for Vesting Tentative Tract 14630 and the Design Review the -eof. R ally submit . red Culler City Planner BB:SN /jfs Attachments: Resolution. of Denial for Vesting Tentative Tract 14630 Resolution of Denial for Design Review for Vesting Tentative Tract 14630 ITEM A Ml f. � 'yi4 .. RESOLUTION NO. 90.145 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP N0. 14630 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF 328 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 20.15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM - HIGH RESIDENTIAL DIS7RICT (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE). IN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLiKEN AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APR: 227- 691 -01 A. Recitals. ii) Lincoin Property Company ham' filed an application for the approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14630 as described to the title of this Resolution. HerefnaftW In this Resolution, the subject Tentative TrACt Nap request is referred to as "the application," (ii) On June 13, 1990, the Planning Comaission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application. Following conclusion of said hearing, the application was automatically denied on a 2 -2 -1 rate. Of the i applicatlonppbycathe sub Planrning Ctmmefssiai petition August a. 1990, d reconsideration Planning Commission voted to reconsider the oppltcetion and directed the applicant to continue working with surround the residents and resubmit revised plans for processing. City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted�ardu Planning hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. The Planning Commission directed that a Resolution of Denial be prepared for the November 28, 1990 meeting (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 8. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determfled, and resolved by the Planning COMMisslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I This i f hiift Crreset firth in the Recitals, Part A, O tsResoluic,, are true and oct. •5d PLANNING CCWISSION Ri UTION 80. 90 -146 YiT 14630 - LINCO ; PRUPERTY CCMPANY November 28, 1990 Pagu 2 2. Based upon subrtantial evidence pres!nted to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing an November 14, 1990, written and oral staff reports, together including with public testimony, this Commissio n n hereby specifically finds as follows: northeast corner)Of The Avenue and Base LinepR Property located on the the northerly half for Medium Residential 8- property zoned zoned on on the southerly half for Medium -High Residential elling er units per acre) and is currently undeveloped; (b) The property north of the subject site is zoned Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and'is developed with single family detached residences. The property to the east is zontm! Low - MediLm Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and is being developed with single family detached residences. The property to the west is zoned 'Proposed City Park' and 1s currently vacant. The property to the south is zoned Neighborhood Commercial and 1s currently vacant, although approval has been granted for a shopping center; condominium units, which a hpe applicantc has �statedsare intended to be rented3as units per acre. an undetermined the applicationiconteaplat swsredes of 16.3 gnating,eunder the density flexibility provisions of the victoria Community Plan, the northerly half of •:�e site to Medium -Nigh Rtsidential to permit said density of 16.3 dwelling units per acre. (d) The application as proposed would be materially detrimental to the persons and properties to the immediate vicinity of the proposed site for the reasons as follows: conflicts with the (I) City oft Rancho eCucamonga,$ Generalwe Plan gpolicy forathe lower end of theld density range- adjacentit low units densityacre) residen iallareas the as exist to the north and east of the subject site. To the contrary, the application proposes to redesignate the northerly half of the Site, which adjoins iw density single family residential areas, from Medium Residential to MedtLm -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre); address a c (ii) The site plan arrangement does not sufficiently flatly residential leareas. The site Unit Pllane43 reflected from thadjacent applicatsingle on arranged in the stacked buildings, arpanaConfiguration associatedswiitthr apartment houstng type. Further, this housing type is inconsistent with General Plan Policy to primarily build detached housing units in the Medium Residential classification; .53 PLANNING COWISSION -a.unui No. 90 -146 VIT 14630 - LINCOLN F..JPER17 COmpANY November 28, 1990 A' Page 3 appplication reflectsialga deacc access plan oint on NlllikennAvenue,Irctfcn the the puDilc attraction of the tutu 100 -acre Central Park being located ime'fately west of the subjecpsite, the site plan would potentially encourage the residents of this project to cross Milliken Avenue aid- block, thus encouraging an unsafe crossing point on a street that is projected to carry a high volume of traffic; does not create thel'attrectiveraesthetIL re as urbanrdesign- Char cteraeonsistent with the goals of the Victoria Community Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The Tentative Tract is not consistent with the General Plan and the Victoria Casmuntty Plan; and consistent with (h) General Planrandpthe�Victoria CoamuTniity Tentative are not substantial envirorcThenteI dammaageoand a oidableiinjuy toshunwnslandteoilld cause or their habitat; and substantial potentialeadverse effectseofethe appliedCfoorrideve lopmentidentlfied 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. S. The Secretary to this Commission shell certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED A40 ADOpTc -0 THIS 28TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 1990. PLANNING COW/ SICN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCM0CA .-5q c r =: 1 ,PLANNING COMMISSION R LUTION NO. 90 -146 YTT 14630'- LINCOLN PROPERTY; ^OMPANY November 28, 1990 Page 4 I, Otto Kroitil, Deputy Secretary Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certif y regularly Introduced, passed, and City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a re on the 28th Gay of November 1990 bi, AYES: CONISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: of the Planning Commission of the City of that the foregoing Resolution was duly and adopted by the Planning Ccalssion of the gwlar meeting of the Pla -ming Ccalssion held the following vote -to -wit: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NONE NONE YALLETTE ' .55 4 1 „ RESOLUTION N0. 90 -147 A NcaULUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIOV. OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, DENYING THS DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT Nn. 14630, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 328 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 20.15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), IN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APH: A. Recitals. Review (of VestinginTracteNo.C�14630 as dscribedpinicthe�titiei"of� this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application.' NO On June 13, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application. Following conclusion of said hearing, the application was automatically denied on a 2 -2 -1 vote. of the MO The applic tinnpp?-- the sPlanningt Cwalssion petition August�8. 1990, 1 reconsideration Planning Cowission ited to reconsider the application and directed the applicant to continue working with surrounding residents and resubmit revised plans for processing. (iv) On November 14, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adopt -on of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: set forth lin the Recitals, Part A. Of specifically Resolution are true and correct, J 2 Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced Public hearing of November 14, 1990, including 6 written and oral staff reports, this Comeissicn hereby specifically finds as follows; _5G 1 y: PLANNING COeMISSICa ISOLUTION NO. 9U -147 OR FOR YTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 28, 1990 Page 2 (a) The appplication applies to property located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road on property zoned on the northerly half for Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and on the southerly half for Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) and is currently undeveloped; (b) The prop.rti north of the subject site is zoned Low Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and 1s developed with single faintly detached residences. The property the east is zoned Low-Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and to 1s being developed with single family detached residences. The property to the west is zoned 'Proposed City Park" and is currently vacant. The property to the south is zoned Neighborhood Commercial and is currently vacant, although approval has been granted for a shopping center; (c) The application contemplates the development of 328 condominium units, which the applicant has stated are intender to be rented as apartments for an undetermined length of t'me, at a density of 16.3 dolling units per acre. Further, the application contemplates redesignating, under the density flexibility provisions of the Victoria Community Plan, the northerly half of the site to Medium -High Residential to permit said density of 16.3 Melling units per acre. (d) The application as proposed would be materially detrimental to the persons and properties in the imisedlate vicinity of the proposed site for the reasons as follows: (1) The proposed density of 16.3 dwelling units per acre conflicts with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan policy for the Medium Residential District (8 -14 d(elling units per acre) to build at the tower end of the density range adjacent to low density residential areas as exist to the north and east of the subject site. To the contrary, the application proposes to redesignate the northerly half of the site, which adjoins low density single family residential areas, from Medium Residential to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre); (it) The sitm plan arrangement does not sufficiently address a compatible transition of unit type and density from adjacent single family residential areas. The site plan as reflected in the application reflects all two -story buildings, ranging from 8 to 16 units per building, arranged to the stacked floor plan configuration associated with apartment housing type. Further, this housing type is inconsistent with General Plan policy to primarily build detached housing units in the Medium Residential classification; (111) The site plan submitted in conjunction with the application reflects a gated access point on Milliken Avenue. With the major public attraction of the future 100 -acre Central Park being located imMediateiy west of the subject site, the site plan would potentially encourage the residents of this project to cross Milliken Avenue mid- block, thus encouragin an unsafe crossing point on a street that is projected to carry a high volume of traffic; 5 OR PLANNING COMIISSIOP ESOLUTICII N0. 90 -147 FOR YTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY CCmpANY November 28. 1990 Page 3 does not create (I V) The architecture as reflected trt the application the Victoria Community aesthetic urban destyn` character consistent dots the gals of the attracts a asthe plan. 9 3 vesreferenced public hearfng andeupon specific offnds Commission Burin the above - set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as Paragraphs objectives of the Gent�al Plan. and protect is not consistent with the the s tfves of the DevelopmentpCodesand the purposes f the district In which the site Is located; and (c) That the proposed design is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and applicable That with the conditions welfare or materially fn�urious to properties t Improvements health, safety, or 4. Based upon the ffadings and conclusions set nforth In paragraphs 1. 2. and 3 above, this Commission hereby denies the application. 6 The Secretary to this Cpeatsslon all certify to the adoption Of this Resolution. sh APPROVF.O AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY CF MOV94SER 1990. PL4NNlHG CVSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a Otto Kra 1, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc onga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and City Of Row Rancho Culumrngi Sat a regular meeting ofetheaPlann! Planning held on tha 28th day of I.,v;Wer 1990 by the following vote- to_xft: AYES: CO!MISSICNERS: CHITIEA, HCNIEL, HELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: CO MISSIONERS: NCNE ABSENT: CCIMISSIONERS: 11ONE z v- ABSTAIN: COFMISSIONEPS: YALLETTE J CITY OF RANCHO CUCi-I%IONGA STAFF REPORT DAZE: November 14, TO: Chairman and Members u' the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner ' y.. BY: Steve Hayes, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14630 PROPERTY COMPANY - -the eve apmen o condominium; units on 10ZYacres of land in the Nedium- H1gh Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units Per acre) in the Victoria Planned Community, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227- 691 -01. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of subdivision map, site plan, gracing pan, 'landscape plan, elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Project Density: 16.3 dwelling units per acre. C. Surrounding Land Ust- and Zoning: North - Single Family Residential; Low- Medium Residential (4 -8 duelling units per acre) South - Vacant; Neighborhood Commercial East - Vacant; Loa - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) West - Vacant, Central Park Site 0. General Plar Designations: Project Site - Low-Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) North - Low- Y,edium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) South - Neighborhood Commercial East - Lw- Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) West - Park E. Site Characteristics: The site, which slopes approximately wee o our percen iron north to south, is vacant with remnants of a former vineyard. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT r YTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 2 F. Parking Calculations: Total Units: 328 Unit Mix - 1 bedroom 112 - 2 bedrooms 184 3 bedrooms 32 Parking Required: 112 X 1.5 • 168 R 184 X 1.8 • 331 • >- 32 X 2.0 • 64 ^ 328 X 0.Z5 • 82 Total Parking Spaces Required G45 � Parking Provided: Enclosed Garage 360 Open (standard) 230 = Open (compact) 56 Total Parking Spaces Provided 646 It. BACKGROUND: On June 13, 1990, the Planning Commission took action an bothVesting Tentative Tract 14630 and Conditional Use Permit 90 -05 for the Lincoln Property proposal. The latter permit would have allowed a 4 percent increase in the allowable percentage of one - bedroom units for the project (maximum 35 percent under the Victoria Community Plan). The recommendation for approval was automatically denied rn a 2 -2 -1 vote. The applicant subsequently filed a request for reconsideration of the tentative map for Planning Commission review. The Planning Commissioi voted to favor of the reconsideration request on July 11, 1990. 111. 'NALYSIS• A. General: The project contains four different unit types (two one - bedroom, one two- bedroom, and one tbr;c- bedroom ftc:r plans) ranging in size from 706 to 1,111 square feet. The units are arranged in six different building types ranging in unit count from 8 to 16 units per building. All building types are two- story. Parking is provided in enclosed garages and open parking stabs. A perimeter drive serves as the primary circulation system for vehicles within the project. On -site amenities include a recreation building, tennis court, tot lots, pools, spas, and open greenbelts that can be used for play areas. Security gates are provided at both vehicular project entrances. (00 S. Only 34 pt,..C• of the units are now propo;ed as one- bedroom units, which is 1 percent under the maximum allowed by the Development Cc::e Therefore, a Conditional Use Peroit is no longer necessm . C Neighborhood Issues: In addltlnn to the Plamrtng Commission's ` es gf e e was considerable Dublic testimony and concern with the project. The residents in the surroundiro neighborhood were concerned that the site was being developed with rental units and not with a for-sale product, the density was too high, builders had rot properly disclosed to buyers that the land was intended for multi - family, the project would detrimentally impact local schools, and that traffic, noise, and crime would increase in the area.' Since that time, the applicant has worked with the , nelghborhncd to address the previously mentioned concerns. Through a series of neighborhood meetings, the applicant hat attempted to address the neighbors concerns by: 1. Eliminating 01 /three -story buildings. PLANNING COWIS3I0H STAFF REPORT " VIT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY _ Novwber 14, 1990 _ Page 3 B. Planning Commission Issues: When the project originally came up or Commission review. several issues and concerns were expressed. The Cm,, .ton noted that the entire architectural scheme needed upgrading (based on its proximity to Central Park), carports should not be used, a perimeter wall or fence might be appropriate, the request for an increase in the number of one- bedroom units allowed was of concern, and details of the acoustical barriers for the patios and decks should be reviewed. These issues have been addressed as follows: r 1. The architectural scheme has been revised and recommended for approval by the Design Review Committee, •,ending the completion of several minor details which are incruded as Conditions of Approval in the attached Desiun Review Resolution. • 2. As mentioned previously, .all carports have been eliminateu. _ 3, portions of the perimeter wall along Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue have been modified to the Standard Victoria Plan theme wall (slumpstone with pilasters). 4. Lexan will be utilized as the sand attenuatiai device for individual patios and units facing Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. S. Only 34 pt,..C• of the units are now propo;ed as one- bedroom units, which is 1 percent under the maximum allowed by the Development Cc::e Therefore, a Conditional Use Peroit is no longer necessm . C Neighborhood Issues: In addltlnn to the Plamrtng Commission's ` es gf e e was considerable Dublic testimony and concern with the project. The residents in the surroundiro neighborhood were concerned that the site was being developed with rental units and not with a for-sale product, the density was too high, builders had rot properly disclosed to buyers that the land was intended for multi - family, the project would detrimentally impact local schools, and that traffic, noise, and crime would increase in the area.' Since that time, the applicant has worked with the , nelghborhncd to address the previously mentioned concerns. Through a series of neighborhood meetings, the applicant hat attempted to address the neighbors concerns by: 1. Eliminating 01 /three -story buildings. � PLANNING COMHISSIOH STAFF REPORT fTT 14630 - LIHCOLH PROPERTY COMPANY s` November 14, 1990 Page 4 2. Reducing the number of 16 unit buildings from eight to two. In acdition, these buildings have been plotted In the center of the site to reduce impacts on aCacent ' properties. { 3. Providing security gat,s at both project entrances. 4. L'liminating all carports; all required covered spaces are enclosed garages. 5 Modifying the architecture to reduce the "hotel" appearance. At the last nefghbw-hood meeting of October 3, 1990, the citizens of the neighborhood were generally in favor of the design modifications proposed by the developer, which were in accordance with pm,vious meetings comments. Hewever, the primary issue of 1 and use has not been resolved. The neighborhood still teeis that the site should be developed with single family detached haves. 9. Oes1 n Review Committee: The Co:mlttee (Henkel, Melcher, Car eman rev ew�ed —{he revised plans and forwarded the project to the full Codmission with the following recommendations: Extensive landscaping, berming, and /or low walls should be provided along Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road to screen the parking areas and garages. 2 The northernmost garage along Milliken Avenue should be relocated ofd` the street frontage. 3. Seating areas should be provided along the main pedestrian spine. 4. Exposed aggregate /retardant finish should be provided for the pedestrian spine. The walk should be a minimum of five feet in width. 5 A second tot lot should be provided to serve the southern portion of the site. 6. Interlocking paver bands should be provided along the main drive aisle at key locations to emphasize sidewalk connections and add interest to the drive aisle. 7 Building 20 (at the east entry) should be skewed to the southwest to provide more open space /landscaping across from the entry. 6,)L- i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT YTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 5 8. A minimum 5 -foot landscaped parkway adjdcant to the right turn pocket on Milliken Avenue was provided on the grading plan. The other plans will be revised to be consistent with the grading plan. 9. Usable landscape areas should be provided betweei all garages and sidewalks. f 10. The Victoria entry monument design should be reviewed and C approved by the Cesign Review Committee. 11 The applicant should study the possibilities of making the pedestrian connection to the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road more formal. 12. The spacing of the pilasters used with the wrcugl %t ir,n fencing should be consistent with the spacing rsed elsewhere to victoria. 13 The materials sample board shoull be submitted for additional Committee review. Of particular concern were the colors of the stucco and trim. 14. More articu'a tion should oe provided within tht belly hand across the buildings. The same detail should be used for the window sills. 15 Stucco wrapped trim should be provided around the patio sl4ding glass door . 16. The bathroom windows on the entry elevations should he recessed. 17. Lexan should be used in puce of plexigiass to achieve necessary ,ound attenuation along Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road. 18. Additional wood trellises -hould be provided over balconies and /or entele5. Also, the applicant should explore the use of the trellis with breaking the ridge of the 400 plan. 19 A perspective of the gable element adjacent to the entry of the 400 plan should be provided for additional Committee review. 20. Particular attention should be paid to the screening of uti,ity meters (i.e., gas, electric). �3 :: PLANNING COMIISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 6 The applicant then resubmitted revised plans based cn the Previous meetings issues. The Design Review Committee (Mc Niel, Coleman) again reviewed the project on October 18, 1990. The items from the above list that were not addressed to the satisfaction of the Committee have been incorporated into the attached Design Review Resolution as Conditions of Approval. E. Technical Review' Committee: The Committee reviewed the project on OetoDUr 2, 1 90, and determined tAst, with the recommended special conditions and attached standard conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The Grading Committee conceptually upproved the project on October 1, 1990. F. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been amp let by�the applicant. Part II of the Environmental Checklist, completed by staff, found that although the project may have a signlr'cant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study have been added to the project approval. 1. Noise: The project is subject to significant noise impacts along Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue. A preliminary acoustical study hat been 'prepared which Identifies mitigation measures (sound barriers) needed to bring the site into conformance wi ^.h City noise standards. The project is designed without a perimeter wall along Base Line Road or Milliken Avenue. Therefore, patios and balconies will require their own sound wall. Patio sound walls most be 6 feet 5 inches (6 feet on Base Line Road) and balcony sound walls must be 6 feet (5 fee: 5 inches on Base Line Road). the elevations as reviewed by Design Review Committee did not address this element; hence, a condition has been adied to go back to the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. A final acoustical report will be submitted (Condition No, 2) to identify precise measures which must be incorporated into the final project design. 2. Schools: In accordance with Urgency Ordinance No, 395, staff received written Input from the affected school districts. Both the Ettwanda and Chaffey Joint Union Nigh School Districts indicated that inadequate capacity will exist to handle the students generated by this project (see Exhibit •G "), Both Districts recommend participating in a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District to provide funding to mitigate the need for additional school facilities Isee Condition No. 1). S. 7� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROFERTY COMPANY November 14, 1990 Page 7 3. Pedestrian Safetyy: The site is located across Milliken ven7lom the future City Central Park which will tend to draw pedestrians across that heavily traveled road at mid - block. Therefore, as a mitigation measure, the applicant must, as a Condition of Approval (see Engineering Division Condition No. 1) reconstruct the Milliken Avenue median landscaping to discourage mid - block pedestrian crossing. IV FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Victoria Community Flan an the General Plan, and will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse impacts. The proposed use, building design, and subdivision, together with all recommended Conditions of Approval, is in compliance with applicable regulations of the Development Code and the Victoria Community Plan. V CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing n e n an Valle Da11y Bultetln newspaper, the property has been posTe, , an no ces w eerto all property owners within 300 feet of the project site and within an expanded notification area. VI RECOMMENDATION: The City Council has determined that this project sho—uTa—E-e—IsUbject to the recently adopted amendment to the Victoria Community Plan which requires Council review and oppruval of any density increase. Therefore, if the Planning Commission supports the project, the attached Resolution recommending approval to the City Council should be adopted. If the Planning Commission cannot support the project, then a Resolution recommending denial should be forwarded to the City Council. BB:SH /jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "D" - Site Plan Exhibit "Co - Vesting Tentative Map Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Building Elevations Exhibit "G" - Correspondence from Affected School Districts Staff Report dated August 8, 1990 Staff Report dated July 11, 1990 Staff Report dated June 13, 1990 Resolution Recmmending Approval for VTT 14630 with Conditions Resolution Reconnending Approval for M 14630 OR with Conditions (0 r MIr- 1E 44 C'r_U -�7 ' ce j � / J � � 13 I L• tf 1 1 [ t-f�l f • � � • l n 1 +lj' w.ra • • u . �•�(. i -�� �1:�,i71 - \, —.� �1i' 'l l 11 1 wr mo[ y, an Off Tv '. CPI`! OF Cj� UCAMONGA rrEM V1I N63o PLANIVINC'r Ff ION /_ TrrLE SA Aa , N , ", (117 EXHIDII: S SCALE: V •, � ,'lam- -I - i•J,•�Y• � �„ I _I 1 N •., 1_ 7 MJ . �� n 1V.• tr i• CITY OF UCAMONGA 1 PLANIW SION �li 7iLE: G,G�D/ pLAi�l N 7 m D SCALF ds n 1 -1I I 0 e� ,LLks U-j oNALJ-J'j c- 1 I cwcara •rna Rw1. /WII MMM I+ M� I� x��LM/VIL MF�a NM �Aeu {W.ITaM J M l� "' �I o e�i' ".4 4 IM OF r � UCAMONGA Trr E° "3 FI..�,,, l PLANM D [ON Guam 7q „ F ,, `1 s > scwt r- - � _ _ _ e =1 I 1 Qk a A layJ 4 4 6 • e a m n� Fj .z H J 0 K 3 m' V Ue 3 '4n L t O z O U� Oq T U C7 pie y 4 �. .�. 1 q ?��, (` o ��� �� b i o d �� ;;�. 0 �o U� �Q t � C7 •`�{ ��' i �S � a � "c ti.� � i� fit° �': ��y �. �� M �sU4. � y�y�� �w1/' \ , B § §7 �m § �a §� M I / z � \ , } e)/ e §§§ ] ° §■ k oK kz � 00. � \ 1_ CIIY OF \ t1CAMONGA PLAN�VING�- F3 � ION tiilf J . •3JNIOOR,Q P®p4AQ19 i OIVfs -- iVil ML(AM. 1161 rM V7 /yb3D T7fLE: F /oo p, fnl ^ 3) N HXH[BrTi"F- f7'IgCALg i !` i 2 � Etch U ��- cEC4, P 0 Box 248, Eawanda. CaGfom,m 91739 (714) 899.2451 c December 1, 1989 fr Brett Huruer, Assistant Planner Community Development Department City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box $07 Rancho Cuc=..Sa, CA 91729 d L. Mr. Horner: SUBJECT: ENVItOME1RAL ASSESSWXr AND TLSTINC TENfATIVE TV= 14630 -- ; L - eve opaatn c, condominium units on acres o a in the Nedium -Hirh Density Residential District in the Victoria P'Inned Community, treated at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and M1111kan Ave.ue -- 1^ APH: 227- 691 -01. q Pursuant to Ordiran ex te No. 395, please be inford that the Etiwanda School District would be willing to enter into a Hallo,-Roos district with the developer to mitiyal,, the need for additional school facilities. The other mitigation procedure the district would accept would be an agreement from the developer to pay square footage fees on all habitable Space. plus a special district assessment of approximately $2,000 per dwell , uait. Either of these measures wauld be considered satisfactory to the district in the mitigation of the impact upon the capacity of our schools. d Sincerely, i < Carleton P. I Otf , Scapa intRtwient CPLsrg P- Ughtfool --I Wra h TjVjr,1CJ '�I Wry F : , "�•S'= MpnIA e 6 iaffey Joint Dillon High School DUrict 211 WEST FIFTH STREET. CNTARIO. CALIFORNIA 91792.1696 . (714) 9689617 WlvwTOOu T of &040ms o L S"I'm November 29, 19e9 A•iaCMTa eti"WTvwviT 1pf1m1C1011 9re, L N " ACIaTA 0040"L araalf Ca W1 LQb CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Planning' Division a 0 e,3x 907 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ATTN Brett Horner 0 J. aie,Y A mdiT m w.wd cE. rT 1e211. u.5. Home This prOjeCt is •n the Etiwcnda High School attendance area Eti -anaa High School is seriously overcrowded. Please see the :haffey District Cipartment of Real Estate Report, encloced. The C %affey Distr ct is in the process of farming a MWillo -nods 0,strict to funC facilities to help mitigate school impaction The D st,ict requests that the City reduire as a condition Of approval of TT i4I11 its annexation into t Mello -Roca Oistrliit -he Chafe, aist•icz has a miti,iation agreement that U.S. Mules may execute if they agree to this condition of approval. Pe TT 14E i0. Lineotn PrOaeriv COmaenv This project, tab, is in the Etiwalda High 3chocl attendanco area The sane comments and Chaffev District requests made above perta'r .c TT 14630 also Z, -T 145A5. Cier -T 14Sa5. ejeres vista To nr^Tn_ Ltd. -nis c,ciect, also is in t�•e Etiwanda High Scr.eoi attendance area `,e sa-e comments and Chafie, District request rade above petal• to T' :4565 also xilf JF RiiM1CNq �;C:: !O(7.r a 6NN1x0 Gum n DE AM 8595E C i -r e ?,� r' :'...��- tt*OCJi ,iT�iaNi. piVlaT�ONT rOUC�tW . �T � elMixet i,9ulttAa .OUiu,O. IM1iTNw `�, M�� �• f I Motfan: Moved by Chitie Seconded by Helcher, to adopt the Resolution approvfng Modification to Coa, ndltfenal Use Permit 88 -19. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY HOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSLMT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried • * s e * H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 14630 - LINCOLN T Y he development o 3'8 tdndomin uci units an .1 acres of land n the Medium High Residential District (14 -24 dwelling units per a are) in the Victoria Planned Community, located on the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - APN: 227- 691 -01. Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, presented the staff report, a letter from resident Paul Henry reiterating concerns that had previously been raised, a letter from Chaffey High School accepting a cash payment in lieu of adding the yroject to the Chaffey District's Community Facilities District, and revised cite and landscape plans depicting elimination of all 16 -unit buildings. Commissioner Helcher indicated it was his understanding that the entry monument design was not being acted upon at this time. Mr. Hayes confirmed that the Resolution was conditioned to require further Design Review Committee approval of the monument design. Commissioner Neither asked if the building elevations included in the staff report were current. Mr. Hayes replied that the elevations were the most current that staff had available. He Indicated that some Design Review Commfttee concerns which were not addressed in the elevations were Included as conditions. He showed slides of the elevation for the entry to the 460 buildings. Commissioner Melcher recollected that the center roof was to be brought out by the creation of pilasters at the corners of the building. Chairman 0101:1 thought the columns were to be similar to the ones at the base of the SteirwI . Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the railings were pipe. Mr. Hayes responded affirmatively. Chairman McNial opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes n -8- November 14. '7s) Scott Sellers, Lincoln Property Company, 4330 La Jolla Village Drive, 1240, San Diego, thanked staff and the Design Review Committee for the time spent on working on the protect. He felt the project was an excellent design He stated the building entry had been revised to address the concerns raised at the Design Review Coeahittee meeting. He said the center element was raised and widened He said they would be happy to incorporate columnar support and bring the el die.:• out. He showed slides of the proposed project. Mr. Sellers stated sec,rity gates had been added He said 1/2 mile of trails would run through the project, including seating areas adjacent to the trails. He reported that ove• 1,000 trees would be planted in connection with the project He discussed the amenities of the units. He requested that the school c3ndition be revised to permit the payment of in -lieu fees and asked for clarification or Engineering Condition 4 with respect to undergrounding. He asked that thry not be required to reconstruct the median island landscaping within Milliken Avenue to discourage pedestrian mid -block crossings because they had added perimeter fencinq to the project. Mr. Sellers reported they had changed the name of the project to Victoria Park Place in deference to the neighbors and stated they had made a number of changes to the project as a result of working closely with the neighborhood. Chairman McHicl asked Barrye Hanson, Senior Civil Engineer, to respond to the question regarding undergrounding. Mr Hanson stated that the undergrounding along Base Line Is essentially completed except for the portion crossing Milliken Avenue. He said the City's standard requirement calls for developers to cross the street when they are undergrounding and he was not sire if the previous project was stilt in the Process of undergrounding adjacent to this project. He requested that the condition be retained. Mr. Hanson stated that Engineering was still concerned that pedestrians would have access to cross the street mid -block even with the perimeter Tenting and felt the median island should be reconstructed to discourage pedestrian crossing. Mr Sellers reported that there were still power poles standing to the east of the project. Mr Hanson responded that the power poles in question are for 66kV, which the City does not require to be undergrcunded. He said the poles had formerly also contained 12kV, which has now been undergrounded Mr. Sellers agreed to the undergrounding. Commissianer Melcher asked If the developer would provide laundry equipment to the Individual apartmants or if there would be any common laundry rooms on the premises Mr Sellers replied that two laundry room facilities were planned and they would typicalii provide about 25 percent of the units with washers and dryers. He indicated that If the Planning Commission should so desire, they would be willing to provide individual laundry equipment within each unit. Planning Commission Minutes -9- November 14, 'sgg 9e3 Commissioner Melcher felt that as the laundry facilities in the units are located an the Individual patios and balconies, it would not be a good idea to have such facilities on the balconies that face street:. Commissioner Chlttea felt that having laundry facilities ou -side would be very inconvenient duri ^g winter months and inclement weather. Hr Sellers responded that they have the some arrangement at other projects and have not experienced any problems. Commissioner Tolstoy felt that as the project will be adjacent to Central Park, it should be outstanding. He a:ked the applicant what amenities he believed would set the project apart from other projects. Me Sellers stated It would be superior oecause it is a security, gate - guarded community with a large amount of common space, garages for all covered park'nq spaces, a large recreation facility, and an extensive trail systam The following residents spoke in opposition to the project* Pete Palos, 11899 Tolentino Drive, Rancho Cucamonga Duke Dana, 10575 Valinda Court, Rancho Cucamonga Richard Naaabal, 6990 Nartanm, Rancho Cucamonga, Evelyn Chavez, 11457 Genova Road, Rancho Cucamonga Patrick Dutton, 11405 Genova Road, Rancho Cucamonga Sharon Boydston, 7066 Del Mar Court, Rancho Cucamonga Mike Oubbs, 6869 Rovato Place, Rancho Cucamonga Carol Douglass, 11463 Genova Road, Rancho Cucamonga Major Jenkins, 11645 Bart Drive, Rancho Cucamonga Lewis Trout, 7861 Lucite Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga Joseph Sudia, 11376 Napoli Drive, Rancho Cucamonga Cen Douglass, 11463 Genova Road, Rancho Cucamonga David Dennis, 6816 Padova Court, Rancho Cucamonga Carol Oubb:, $069 Rovato Place, Rancho Cucamonga George Hicks, 10430 Almond, Rancho Cucamonga Michael Chavez, 11457 Genova woad, Rancho Cucamonga They were concerned about density, traffic, graffiti, school Impaction, crime. rental project vs. owner- occupled, location of laundry facilities on balconies and patios, proximity of the project to the park, adequacy of visitor parking. adequacy of stacking capability for vehicles entering the gated project, and the need for drought- tolerant tandsceping. They asked that the City project what the development would be like to another 15 -20 years, and feared the Project may potentially turn into a ghetto. One resident requested that the City approve the Covenants. Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) along ait4 the project, because the CC&R's would affect the aesthetics 'n the future They requested that the property be developed with single family residences. Gary Luque, William Lyon Company, 8540 Archibald, Rancho Cucamonga, states they were the master developers of the Victoria Gmmunity Plan and would :e responslhle for the monument sign. He stated the William Lyon Company ^a' A Planning Commission minutes -10- November ;s, .• 7-D already installed the median landscaping according to plan and he didn't see how reconstruction would restrict pedestrian crossing. He commented that the number of units in the prtject had been significantly reduced to 16 per acre while a nearby project contains 22 units per acre. He reported that Victoria contains 1,000 units lets than what was originally approved In the community plan. He Indicated tLet traffic in the development had been considered and sound planning had therefore placed the project at the corner of two large streets, buffered from single family residences on the north by the railroad. with Neighborhood Commercial located to the south and a park to the west. He discussed school sites and stated they were working with the school district to an the purchase recommend approval of the School project and feltedthait Lincoln Planning Properties rties had patiently worked with the Planning Commission, staff, and the community to address concerns. Mr. Sellers stated they could be happy to redesign the floor plans to have rashers and dryers inside the units instead of the Patios and balconies. He reported that the project included 82 guest parking spaces and an acceleration and deceleration lane at the gated entrances. He felt adequate vehicle stacking distance was Included. He commented that the project was already required to comply with the Reriscape Landscaping Ordinance. He stated that the project would pay over one million dollars in school fees and the SChoe District had agreed to sich payment to mitigate impacts. He said it was incumbent that the property be managed properly and Lincoln Property would •± retaining the property and would provide good management. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Chitiea felt that as the site is located across the street from Central Park, it must represent the best the community has to offer and be of the highest quality. She considered the proposed project to be sihstandard to many projects in the City. She thought fireplaces should be provided and felt the offer to redesign the floor plans to move washers and dryers inside was too little, too late. She did not support the project at the proposed density in its location. Commissioner Tolstoy felt that as the project would be across from the lark, it should reflect some of the park setting, mimicking some of its elements. He felt the project density wag scceptabla and the location was good on major streets to keep the traffic flow off residential streets. He Indicated the placement near a shopping center was sound planning, and he felt a high density project should be near a park. However, he felt the design was not up to City standards. Commissioner Melcher did not feel density to be an issue. He indicated tie density had been reduced and he felt the range had been properly Planned for. Ile did not abject to the fact that the project was planned to be a rental property, and thought future maintenance was not an issue. He reported that fee and Chairman McMiei had spent f've hours an Monday viewing ot'we properties which had been built and were maintained by Ilt:olr Property a,,: they appeared to do a good job of property maintenance. He felt that scroo't Planning Commission Minutes -)1- November should not be an issue, as the schools have been planned for. He felt the main Issue to be quality. He thought the developer had worked patiently and doggedly, but °-nfortunately was still trying to rework the original concept. He felt there wort ;•tter options and did not support the project. Chairman McNfel reiterated that he had spent most of Monday inspecting properties owned and maintained by the developer. He said three of the properties were similar to the proposed project. He folt the location adjacent to the park and shopping would reduce the traffic Impact; however, he +q thought the project needed to be superior to what had been presented. s � Motion: Moved by Chl ties, seconded by Melchor, to direct staff to prepare a Resolution of denial ror Environmental Assessment and Vesting Tentative Tract ^ 14630 for the November 28, 1990, Consent Calendar. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COK415SIONERS: NONE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE - carried 10:00 p m. - Planning Commission recessed. 10:15 p.m. - Planning Commission reconvened. I VARIANCE 90 -11 - FlULITY CONSTROCTICH - A re4uest to allow a free- standing decorative arch structure to be located within the front yard setback of a single family lot within the Very low Residential District (1 -2 dwelling unitr per acre) at 10482 Almond Avenue - APN: 1074 - 121 -26. Bruce Buckingham presented the staff -sport aid pictures of the site including the base of where the ar.h would be placed. Chairman McNiel opened the public baring. Sam Jeng, 12419 Sunnycreek Lane, Cerritos, stated he had been hired by the homeowner to upgrade the house snd they considered the proposed arch to be part of the landscaping. Chairmen McMiel asked if the balance of the arch would M of salmon granite, similar to the base. Mr. Jeng responded that It would be plain concrete, painted white. Commissioner Chitlea asked hew high the arch would extend above the roof tine. Planning Cumeisslon Minutes -I2- November Is, °190 95 M a RESOLUTION N0. ql- OJ$ A RESp.U`IC41 LF THE CITY CWNCIL• OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CW ORNIA, /DENYING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14630 FOR THE DEYLLOPMENT OF 328 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON 20.15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14- 24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED Ca'K LAITY, LCCA70 ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLIKEN AVENVE AND MAK194 FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN. 227 - 691 -01 A. Recitals. (1) Lincoln Property Company has filed an application for the epP.Oval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 14630 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." (1i) On June 13, 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application. Following conclusion of said hearing, the application was autOinatically denied on a 2 -2 -1 vote. (tit) The applicant subsequently filed a petition for reconsideration of the application by the Planning Commission On August 8, 1990, the Planning Commission voted to reconsider the application and directed the applicant to continue working v'th surrounding residents bnd resubmit revised plans for processing. (iv) On the 14th day of November 1950, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and following the conclusion of said hearing, the Planning Commis % ton adopted itr. Resolution No. 90 -146 denying the application. (v) The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was timely appealed to this Council. Rancho(Cucamong tconducted aa duly noticed 1991, the hearing on ithe application and concluded said hearing on the date. (rid) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. N CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION No. APPEAL OF Vii 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY January 16, 1991 Page 2 B. Resolution. Now. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: This all of the acts set forth in the RecitalsPart A,o thisResoluion artrue and correct. 2. the above-referenced r up substantial evidence presented L ublich aringonJanuaryM, 1991,Incl uudingwrittenrand oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road on propeerty zoned he the onether ourtherlyl half fordiMediums- NigAlRes1(8 -14 lwelling units ling units per acre) and is currently undeveloped; Residential (2-4)dwelling units per acre)fand is developed withlsing eefamily detached residences The property to the east is zoned Low- Median Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and is being developed with single family detached residences. The property to the west is zoned "Proposed City Park' and is currently vacant. The property to the south is zoned Neighborhood Commercial and 1s currently vacant, although approval has been granted for a shopping center; condoinfur units, which the applicant has stated are intended to be rentod3as apartmen!s for an undetermined length of time, at a density of 16.3 dwelling units per acre. Further, the application contemplates redesignating, under the density flexibility provisions of the Victoria Cctmunity Plan, the northerly half of the site to Hedfum -High Residential to permit said density of 16.J dwelling units per acre. (d) Pursuant to the provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, the development as contemplated in the cpplication requires a separate discretionary Design Review rpproval regarding the compatibility and design of proposed structures (e) The application as proposed is not in conformance with the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and would be materially detrimental to persons or property to the mediate vicinity due to (1) The proposed density of 16 3 dwelling units per acre conflicts with the City of Ra cho Cucamonga's General Plan policy for the Ntdium Residential District (8-14 d+ellfng units per acre) to build at the lower end of the density range adjacent to low density residential areas as 97 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. APPEAL OF VIT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY January 16, 1991 Page 3 exist to the north and east of the subject site. To the contrary, the application proposes to redesignate the northerly half of the site, which adjoins low density single family residential areas, from Medium Residential to Medfum -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre); address a compatible2transitiontOf unit typeaand density does not from adjacent sufffcIeutl family residential areas. The site plan as reflected in the application reflects all two -story buildings, ranging from 8 to 16 units per building, arranged in the stacked floor plan configuration associated with apartment housing type. Further, this housing type is inconsistent with General Plan policy to primarily build detached housing units In the Medium Residential classification; application reflects (3) a gated access point on in MMilliken AvenuenctWith the major public attraction of the future 100 -acre Central Park being located immediately west of the subject site, the site plan would potentially encourage he residents of this project to cross Milliken Avenue mid -block, thus encouraging an unsafe crossing point on a street that is projected to carry a high volume of traffic; not create the 'attractive aesthetic urban design" character character application with the goals of the Victoria Coammity Plan. The architecture was described by the Planning Commission as "mundane' and 'pedestrian" in appearance and without regard to the surrounding area. 3. At the above - referenced public hearing, the Council denied he associated Design Review application during the abovesreferenced public hearingeand upon the specific this findingscof facts set forth In paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) The Tentative Tract is not consistent with the General Plan and the Victoria Camnfy Plan; and consistent with the General PlanrandpthemVictoria Community Plan; and are not substantial environmentaledammaageoand avoidable i injuory to humanslandtwildlife or their habitat, and (d) The evidence presented to this Council has identified substantial potential adverse effects of the applied for development. S. This Council hereby provides notice to oC Lincoln Property yCompany Resolution time within gioveerned by the provlston%oof Ce�efornia bodetho; Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. /8 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. - APPEAL OF YTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY January 16, 1991 Page 4 6. The directed to (a) certify toethe adoptionCofythis Resolution, aa dg(b) ifnrtJiwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return_ receipt requested, to Lincoln Property Company at the address identified in City records 7. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, S. and 6 above, this Council hereby denies the application. r• t i RESOLUTION N0, 91- Q/ 9 , tJ- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING E DESIGN REVIEW FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14630, THE DEVELOPMENT OF 328 CONDOMINIUM UNITS VN 20.15 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MEDIUM (C -14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) AND MEDIUM -HIGH RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (14 -24 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), WITHIN THE VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND MINCING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: A. Recitals. (1) Lincoln Property Company has filed an application for the Design Review of Vesting Tract No. 14630 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter, the subject Design Review request is referred to as 'the application." (ii) On June 13, 1990, the Planning Coamisafon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the subject application Following conclusion of said hearing, the application was automatically dented on a 2 -2 -1 vote. (Iii) The applicant subsequently filed a petition for reconsideration of the application by the Planning Commission. On August 8, 1990, the Planning Commission voted to reconsider the application and directed the applicant to continue working with surrounding residents and resubmit revised plans for processing. (iv) On the 14th day of November 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application and following the conclusion of said hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 90 -147 denying the application. (v) The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was timely appealed to this Council. (vil On the 16th day of January 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. _ (v11) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred Ann CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. APPEAL OF DR FOR VTT 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY C014PARY January 16, 1991 Page 2 8. Resolution. NON, THEREFORE, it Is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: I. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A. of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing of January 16, 1991, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located on •4e northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road on property zoned on the northerly half for Medium Residential (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) and on the southerly half for medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre) and is currently undeveloped; (b) The property north of the subject site is zoned Law Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre) and is developed with single family detached residences. The property to the east is zoned Low - Medium Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre) and is being developed with single family detached residences. The property to the west is zoned "Proposed City Park" and is currently vacant. The property to the south is zoned Neighborhood Commercial and is currently vacant, although approval has been granted for a shopping center; (c) The application contemplates the development of 328 condominium units, which the appiicant has stated are intended to be rented as apartments for an undetermined length of time, at a density of 16.3 dwelling units per acre. Further, the application contemplates redesignating, under the density flexibility provisions of the Victoria Comunity Plan, the northerly half of the site to M^dfus -High Residentim al to permit said density of 16.3 dwelling units per acre. (d) Pursuant to the provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code, the development as contemplated in the application requires a seperate approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map. (e) The application as proposed is not in conformance with the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Victoria Community Plan, and Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and would be materially detrimental to persons or property In the immediate vicinity due to: conflicts with the City of RanchopCucamonga 'syGeneral3Planipolicynfor the the Medium Residential District (8 -14 dwelling units per acre) to build at the lower end of the density range adjacent to low density residential areas as - ;i it CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. APPEAL OF OR FOR M 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY January 16, 1991 Page 3 exist to the north and east of the subject site. To the contrary, the application proposes to redesignate the northerly half of the site, which adjoins low density single family residential areas, from Medium Residential to Medium -High Residential (14 -24 dwelling units per acre); (2) The site plan arrangement does not sufficiently address a compatible transition of unit type and density from adjacent single family residential areas. The site plan as reflected in the application reflects all two -story buildings, ranging from 8 to 16 units per building, arranged in the stacked floor plan configuration associated with apartment housing type. Further, this housing type is inconsistent with General Plan policy to primarily build detached housing units in the Median Residential classification; (3) The site plan submitted in conjunction with the application reflects a gated access point on Milliken Avenue. With the major public attraction of the future 100 -acre Central Park being located immediately west of the subject site, the site plan would potentially encourage the residents of this project to cross Milliken Avenue mid -block, thus encouraging an unsafe crossing point on a street that is projected to carry a high volume of traffic; (4) The architecture as reflected in the application does not create the 'attractive aesthetic urban design' character consistent with the goats of the victoria Community Plan. The architecture was described by the Planning Coaaission as 'mundane' and 'pedestrian' in appearance and without regard to the surrounding area. 3 At the above - referenced public hearing, the Council denied the associated vesting Tentative Trart Map application. 4. Based upon sutttan_ial evidence presented to Viis Council during the above - referenced public hearing and upon specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed project is not consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and (b) That the proposed design is not to accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site 1s located; and (c) That the proposed design is not in compliance with each of the applicable proiisions of the Development Code; and (d) That the proposed design, together with the cnnditlons applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the Dubllc health, safety, or welfare or mater:ally injurious to properties or improvements In the vicinity. 01 ■) r � CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION N0. , l - APPEAL OF OR FOR M 14630 - LINCOLN PROPERTY ComPANY Januar- 16, 1991 Page 4 S. This Council hereby provides notice to Lincoln Property Company that the time within which Judicial review of the decision represe0ea by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. directed to (a)certi yCtorthefadoptionyoffthiscResolution. and (b)efor`hwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return receipt re quested, to Lincoln Property Company at the address identif'•l�in City records. 1 1, 2, 3, 4, S, 6an d d6ua g set /03 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: I. $gCOWtENDATiON: It is recommended that thin report, public input and the Planning Commission recommendation be considered by the City Council and an appropriate alternative confirmed for implementation. II. BACKGROUND: The City was contacted by Mr. Vern Woodring expressing his concern with the General Plan's designated width of Almond Street, which is a 66 -Loot right -of -way, 44- foot curb -tn -curb residential collector. Mr. Woodring h6s stated in his petition that Almond Street does not require a street this wide curb -to -curb. fie stated that the wider street would encourage increased traffic, parked care and intrude upon the width of the equestrian trail. The City Council has naked the Planning Commission to review this request and evaluate the current situation as to the necessity of maintaining the current street standard of Almond. The Commissicn reviewed the item at its December 12, 1990 meeting. III. ANALYSIS: Almond Street was designated as a residential collector street (66 -foot right -of -way, 44 -foot curb -to -curb) in the County's Road System which was adopted by the City in its General Plan. Almond Street extends for one mile from Turquoise Avenue to Carnalian Street. As such, it in the northcrnmost collector street in the northwestern area of the City and will servo a large part of the City's future development in the sphere of influence. Currently, Rodine Companies, Inc. is developing the southwest corner of Sapphire and Almond Streets (Tract 13778). As a condition of approval of that devolopmont, Rodine is completing half of Almond including the intersection of Sapphire and Almond Streets and any necessary transitions per City Standards and the City's Master Plan of Trails. The _ y CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT RE: WOODRINO PETITION /ALMOND ST. January 16, 1991 Page 2 remain.ing portion east of Sapphire, north of Mr. Woodring's residence is a half street, varying in width, with no improvements along the southern half of the street (see Exhibit "A "). The development pattern along Almond street is similar to portions of Ftillsido Road and Banyan Street, which are other collector streets in the area. Almond Street is already built to a 22 -toot half -width on the north side for almost a half mile east of Sapphire Street. At full build -out there will be approximately 100 more houses contributing to Almond Street traffic. The straight alignment and amount of future development in the area will result in about 2,000 tripe par day and could encourage speeds in the 35 to 40 MPH range, typical for collector streets. Another safety consideration is the eventual connection of Almond Street, along already dedicated rigght -of -way, to Carnelian Street at its east end. This will oliminato Almond Street becoming a long dead -end street and improve circulation in the area. IV. CONCLUSION: Three options were presented to the Planning commission as follows: , 1. Retain the 66 -foot right -of -way and 44 -toot curb -to -curb width from east of Sapphire to Carnelian, leaving 11 feet available for a trail similar to the Sapphire Street trail between Lemon and Banyan Streets (ace Exhibit "B ") . 2. Reduce the south half of the street between Sapphire and Carnahan Streets to a 14 -toot width within a total 66- foot right -of -way, leaving 19 feet for a trail and providing a 36 -toot street, the minimum required. This would require an additional 1 -toot of right -of -way on the south side if a standard 20 -Soot trail is desired (ace Exhibit "C "). 3. Reduce the street botwoun Sapphire Street and 500 feet west of Carnelian Street to a 36 -foot curb width in a 66- foot right -of -way and retain a 44 -foot curb width in a 66 -foot right -of -way from this point to Carnelian Street. This is to provide a widened section in the portion of Almond Street where trips from future development will have the most impact. This option dictates varying trail widths from 11 feet to 20 foot from west of Sapphire to carnelian (sea Exhibit "D "). I M.r CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT REt WOODRINO PETITION /ALMOND ST. January 16, 1991 Page 7 The Commission considered traffic safoty and Lira safoty needs, as wall as general circulation needs in the area. Also considered was the continuity in the Community Trail along the mouth side Of Almond Street and the relative benefit of obtaining -the standard trail width rather than a narrower one. Alternative No. 2 was chosen by the 10� Y ° s r _.. LI _- `' Figure III -7 a -.= nnmmm T, It MASTER PLAN a.m o�.. "m. �; 6.1 ...... oaGC00, ���� OF TRAILS ` 7.: TRAIL SYSTEM ( EXISTING COMMUNITY 000O0 PROPOSED COIIAMUNITY s O REGIONAL MULTI - SYSTEM PARKS "t" • ` ` ' =1 PROPOSED PARKS ti © M EXISTING PARKS D /D FLOATING DESIGNATION A a•„4 � •--• s SCHOOLS* 4�, •ur PROPOS ED SCHOOLS .t„" EXISTING SCHOOLS •PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE LOCATIONS ARE TENTATIVE, BASED UPON INFORFIATION PROVIDED -:71 1 Bf EACH SCHOOL DISTRICT. II CIVIC /C(JMMUNITY CENTEF .t" [I] EQUESTRIAN /RURAL AREA /CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA . r d r t' ALMOND ST. OPTIONS I I .J N ALMOND �j VARIABLE DIRT 1 � ct+ I V W H PLAN VIEW /0 EXHIBIT A W. ALMOND ST. OPTIONS PL ' r CL CROSS SECTION ALMOND PLAN VIEW w y EXHIBIT B t c> PL J ALMOND ST, OPTIONS PL PL r ss h —.�y•� 22• 14• I cL CROSS SECTION czi ALMOND F� PLAN VIEW EXHIBIT C i d v .. ALMOND ST, OPTIONS e3 ALMOND .� z y PLAN VIEW tai 'd �1 11 �' EXHIBIT D _'1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 16, iS91 TO: Mayor, Bombers of the City Council and city Manager FRONT Joe Schultz, CLP, Community Services Director SDHJECTt BAN BFRNILRDINO CQIJF2T1f P nv Awn O_EN SPACE DISTR= AT10t To diacuso the merits of a proposed San Bernardino county Park and open Space District and the projects anticipated to benefit the taxpayers of Rancho Cucamonga. PLSK.SiHO : Legislation passed by the State Legislature and signed into law in Saptember 1990 by the Governor allows the Board of Supervisors to initiate the District formation process by placing a measure on the ballot to establish a Pdrk and Oven Space District. A majority vote would be required for passage. The meusure placed before the voters would specify District boundaries tnd a proposed benefit assessmunt amount, or a range within which the governing body may fix and thereafter ravine the assessment, to provide a revenue raurce for the District in addition to general fund monios and user fees. The District real not cover the entire County2 within the District boundaries, unincorporated areas would be included as well as any cities and park and racreation district which choose to be included during the formation procesa by City Council or Governing Board resolution. Voters within such cities and park one recreation districts would then participate in the election to form the District. An Ad Hoc Committee of city managers, Park directors and representatives of the Regional Parke Department have been meeting regularly since Juno to develop the specifics of the District proposal, including joint projects to be funded and a revenue apportionment formula for each geographic none within the District. Thus, cities and park and recreation districts would know precisely what the now park and Open Space District would be and do before making a decision about joining. Unlike a bond measure which provides for a one time, fixed amount of revenue, the District provides an ongoing source of revenue which increacee with growth from the creation of nay parcels. The assessment amount can only be reduced or eliminated by a subsequent ballot measure. Z RESOLUTION No. RESOLUTIrQN OF THE co p (CLSiis+ 9 OF REQUESTING TO HE INCLUDED IN THE CREATION .Y1 OF A PROPOSED SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY REGIONAL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT WHEREAS, Section 5506.8 of the California Public Rssources Code, as added by Chapter [1], of the Statutes of 1990, authorizes the formation of a Regional Park and Open Space or Regional Open - Space District in San Bernardino County] and . WHEREAS, such proposed Regional Park and Open Space District would be formed for the general purpose of acquiring, praserving, protecting, operating and maintaining open space, parks, habitat conservation areas, as well as hiking, bicycle and e,:eatrian trails; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino, As authorized in Public Resources Coda section 5506.8, intends to initiate prnceadings to establish such a proposed Regional Park and Open Space District and call an election to determine whether the proposed District should be established and whether a special benefit assessment should be levied on real Property within the proposed district: and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5506.8, any city or park and recreation district within San Bernardino County may, by resolution of its governing body, request to be included within the propo.:ed Regional Park and Open Space District for regional and local park and open space purposes; and WHEREAS, th l'i = y Cod.v�ic Cn rng -bo dosires to provide its voters within the (�=— i%rk a c caeaLion ddeLniet) with the Opportunity to participate in an election to determine (i) whether 1 a the proposed regional Park and Open Space District Should be established and (SS) the amount of the proposed assessment or range of the proposed assessment. NO'r7,. :`{E1trFORE� Cis (governiM7- r6 -dYj• the (o ri,ry- r)rand,. C hereby requasts to be included in the proposed San 8arnardine cou °r.. n °..4....., 3 �.�. zto � 2 , SBCO open Space District January 16, 1991 Page 2 ABBEY@=$: Projects accomplished through the creation of a Park and Open Space District with a benefit assessment augment existing funding source" would incraaas to residmnt quality specs and Of life by protecting natural open providing park and recreation facilities. Ht only doer the Provision of adequate parks, trails o and open space craate more attractive communities, there amenities also increase Property values. The anticipated revenue based on 33,000 parcels will goneratq approximately $1,155,000; half going to the County and he' to the City. Thus, the approximate $600,000 revenue to the City annually from the District assessment will not must all of o:ir acquisition, doveloPmsnt, operating and maintenance needs. However, this additional revenui could become part of our overall financial strategy. Elements of a comprehensive funding program normally consist of State and Federal Grants, us,.- and development impact fame (Quimby), landscape and lighting district assessments, general obligation or revenue bonds, and other City or District revenue sources. The assessment collected through the District is not envisioned to provide funding for all our park, recreation, span space and trails needs. The $36.00 annual aseeeement per parcel can partially fund Counr.y and City capital improvements as well as operations and maintenance (o p H). (The Countyls proposed Memorandum OZ Understanding (H.O.U.) explains that only 50% of the assessment revenue can be used for o Z H the first five years.) Thereafter, all revenue can be used for operations and maintenance if you no choose. The Proposed County Zone project list for the Hest Valley includes projects positively effecting our citizens: m Cucamonga - Guasti Regional Park Inprovements Deer Creek Natural Area (Chaffoy) Regional Park It is staff opinion that all revenue collected from the city Portion of the assessment district be allocated to Central Park Projects, including operations and maintenance because of our policy that construction of new local parks and /or recreation facilities must have a source of revenue to defray costa. // l , I 0 0 �c SHCO open space District January 16, 1991 Page 3 The proposed open space district takes a majority vote (sit) to pees county wide. Even if our residents vote against the measure, but it passes county wide, we are included in the special benefit assessment district. one other option that exists to su;,lmmsnt local park projects, but will do nothing to further park and open space projects regionally is a citywide bond measure that would take a two - thirds (2/3) vote to gams. 2MMUNs Council directed staff on January 9, 1991 to compile a report on the prom and cons of a County open space District verous a City Initiative. This report is currently being generated and will be forwarded to you with the revised county resolution draft. We anticipata this being delivered to yon Monday the 14th with the conmensus of Council Subcommittee, Wright and Suquot. Respectfully submittod, Y J ' Schultz, C Community Se icss Director JS /kls Attachment co: Deputy City Managers Park and Recreation Commiosion Division Honda iF J' 1!5 =fit a i 1UMORANDWI OF UNDERSTANDING REZAT14C TO THE PROPOSED SAN nERNARDl7NO COUNTY PARK AND OPYK SPACE DISTRICT This Memorandum of understanding (hereinafter referred to as "MOU ") is entered into on the date signed below by and between the San Bernardino County Regional Parks Department (hereinafter reforred to as "Department ") and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter referred to as "Participant "). M =Tfi WHEREAS, Section 5506.8 of the California Public Rssoures Coda, as added by Chapter 1017 of the Status of 1990, effective January 1, 1991, authorizes the formation of a Park and Open Space District in San Bernardino County; and smPncAc, such proposed Park and Open Space District would be formed for the general purpose of acquir!ng, preserving, protecting, developing, operating and maintaining open space, parks, recreation facilities and habitat conservation areas, as wall as hiking, bicycle and equestrian trails; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto expect that the Board of Supervisors of the Coanty of San Bernardino, as authorized in Public Resources Code Section 5506.8, will initiate proceedings to establi -sh a Ban Bernardino County Park and Open Space District (hereinafter referred to as "District") and call an election to determine whether the proposed District should be established and whether a special benefit assessment should be levied on real property within the proposed Distriott and WHEREAS, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5506.8, it is also expected that Participant will, by resolution of its governing body, request to be included within the propo"d District for open space purposes; and WHEREAS, the Department is administering the organization of the District) and WHEREAS, Participant and Department fish to not forth in this MOU their intent and understanding of the desired relationship between the District and Participant in the avant the District is formed, while recognizing that the District cannot enter into or be bound by agreements entered into prior to its establishment, and Purther recognizing that this KOU is a formative document that is subject to final approval by District (once formed) and Participant. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as followst /6 1. Revenue generated within the Participant's boundaries shall be divided 504 to the Participant and 504 to the District. (Where tow Participants' jurisdictional boundaries overlap (i.e. a park and recreation district whose boundaries include an incorporated city as well as unincorporated land), revenue collected by the District from parcels within the city shall be disbursed, according to the apportionment agreed upon for that zone, entirely to the city). such amounts shall be determined after deducting the costs identified in paragraph 9. Participant's share is intended for use under the sole control of Participant for park and open space purposes as defined in Divisions, Chapter 3, Article 3 of the Public Resources coda and in accordance with the terms of this MUV. Z. The District '■ share of revenues generated in the Participant's Zone !hall be expended within that zone. A zone Ss s geographic subdivision of the District established for Is purposes. It is anticipated that the District's zones shall substantially correspond to the planning districts identified in the San Bernardino County Regional Parks Department Strategic Master Plan, dated October 31, 1988. During the first five years following the establishment of the District, no more than 504 of the Participant's cumulative share for that five year period, and no more than 504 of District's cumulative share for that tive year period, say be used for operations and maintenance of projects authorized and funded after th4 data of astablishnant of the District. A project is defined as land acquisition, capital improvement, rehabilitation, program(s) for park and open space purposes, and includes planning, such as master plaus, for such prcjeots. operations and maintanance costs include salaries, benefits, materials, services, supplies, equipment, and administrative overhead associated with the daily operation of the project. At no time may revenues derived from the benefit assessmant be used for operation and maintenance for projects authorized and funded prior to the establishment of the District. Both the Participant and the District shall make a good faith effort to maintain the existing level of funding for parks, trailu, recreation and open space purposes. It is the intent of both the Participant and the District that in the event of annexation of unincorporated territory within the District by the Participant, the sane share of revenue from the annexed area committed to the funding of District projects prior to annexation shall continuc to be committed to those projects until indebtedness incurred by the District for said projects is retired. When this indebtedness in retired, 117 e.' j thA apportionment formula than in effect with the Participant shall be in effect in the annexed area. It is further the intent of both the Participant and the District that should the Participant annex territory that ancompaomts a park, trail or open space improvement planned by the District, assessment funds accumulated for the planned improvement will be transferred to the Participant if the District elects not to oroceed with the project. The aforesaid notwithstanding, :anal determination regarding the status and apportionment of revenues generated within the annexed area shall be determined by the :.*cal Agency Formaticn Commission (LhPCO) in conjunction with its approval of the proposed annexation. LAFCO's determination shall be binding on both the District and the Participant. 6. Both the District and the Participant shall be bound, upon detachment from the District by the Participant, by the final determination of LAFCO regarding the amount of revenue to continue to be committed to debt retirement by the Participant for debts incurred by the District. I. The District shall prepare or cause to be prepared an annual audit of revenues and expenditures by the District and deliver a copy to the Participant. The Participant shall conduct an equivalent annual audit regarding its expenditure of revenues derived from the District and deliver a copy to the District. Each entity shall bear the cost for preparation and distribution of its audit from its share of the District revenues. e. The District and the Participant shall each prepare a multi- year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the acquisition and devalopment of parks, recreational facilities, trails and open space areas within two years of establishment of the District and shall periodically revise and update said plan. The CIP will include project titles, brief project descriptions and project coat estimates. 9. The Participant's share of the revenues collected within its boundaries shall be disbursed to the Participant within thirty (JO) days attar the revenues are disbursed to the District by the Auditor /Controller- Racorder's Office (A/C -RO). The AC- RO's costa associated with the collection and disbursement of revenues, including the neaassary updating of information regarding the number and status of parcels within the District, shall be deducted from all revenues prior to division of the revenues between th-r Participant and the District. The amount deducted for the District's administrative costa associated with collection and disbursement of revenues (but not including the A /C -RO'e costs) shall be limited to a maximum of one and one -half percent (1.5t) of the total revenue generated by the benefit Ml- I. ■ ■ as�assaent. 10. No obligation or other indebtes'ness shall be incurred by the District for any project v1thin the Participaat's boundaries until the substance of this MOD to approved and executed by the Participant and the District. 11. It is the intent of the parties to this MOU that itla substance shall.be submitted to the Governing Hoard of 'the District, once established, for approval in the fora of a binding agreement betxaen the District and the Participant. The parties recognise that'the substance of this MOD is not binding unless and until such an agreement 1s approved and exacuted by the Participant and the District. BAN BERNARDINO coDNTy REGIONAL PARES DEPARTMENT Interim Directu- //9 PARTICIPA.411 -il srz C` t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE Jcnuary 16, 1991 10: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager BY: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECT, Conside.00 1 of An 2296 uptinns For Sh b'at riel It.... F• ly line. Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council mile= the 'Local Task Force review and comment' option of AB 2296 as recommended by the Facilities Siting Committee of the Solid Waste Advisory Tmk Force. Background: The Solid Waste Advisory Task Force has requested that all cities In the county comment on siting review options for Materials Recovery Facilities which will recover leas than 15% or the Haste that they process. The option being recommended by the Solid Waste Advisory Task Force Facilities Siting Committee establlshes a procedure whereby the facility In question Is reviewed by the Local Tut Force. The task Farce would then meet and comment In writing on the application. The Task Fame then would transmit those comments to the applicaat. the county led all the cities in the county. This procedure Is the same as that used for facilities recover more than 15% of the waste that they process. The second option that Is available calls for county and city review and comment. This option requires a public hearing and review and approval by the County Board of Supervisors and a majority of the titles containing a majority of the population. This Is a lengthier and more costly procedure. The view of the Task Force Committee was that city tied county Interests could be represented under the first option at th, Task Force level. Since the membership of the Task Force Is made up of city end county representatives. the feeling was that the additional costs and time for the public hearings at each agency was unnecessary. Also, it was felt that no proposal would be Presented in the county hr ■ facility Sat would recover less than 15% of pmceasrd waste u state mandated guidelines require waste diversion of 25% by 1995 and 50% by 2000. Based on the analysis and recommendation provided by the Task Force Committee and the fact that tu:arly every other city In the county has endorsed that recommendation, it Is recommended that the City council endorse the option requiring Local Task Force review and comment. t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE. January 16, 1991 TO. Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBIECI` Consideration of a Resolution Adding the City of Chino to the West Fnd omm,ni ations Financing Authority Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution adding the City of Chino to the already formed West End Communications Financing Authority. Background: The City of Chino has expressed an interest in financing its portion of the 800 MHz communications system through the pooled financing being proposed b^ the City, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the City of Ontario. Sharing the costs for the financing will reduce the end costs to each of the participating agencies. Because adding Chino will reduce our costs and becn,tse Chino is a Integral part of the proposed backbone for the communications system, it is recommended that the City Council approve Chino's addition to the Financing Authority R eetfully Submitted, I � 30028-01 J~.BDOM& 11/J690 ( o1ro2At CITY OF RANCNO GUGAMOHOA f ALKORNIA 010 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AMENDED AND RESTATED JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE WEST END COMMUNICATIONS FINANCING AUTHORITY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City, as follows: WHEREAS, the City, the City of Ontario and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District have heretofore approved and executed a Mint exercise of powers agreement, dated February 21, 1000, creating the West End Communications Financing Authority (the "Authority') pursuant to Articles 1 through 4 (commencing with section 6500),of Chapter 5, Division 7, This 1 of the CPllfomia Government Coda (the "Agreement"); WHEREAS, is is necessary and desirable to amend and restate the Agreement to, among other thing;, provide for the membership of the City of Chino, California, in the Autho.ty; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED and DETERMINED, as follows: SeCllon 1. Amended and Resisted Agreement. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the Mayor, the City Manager, any Assistant City Manager or the Finance Director to execute and the City Clerk to attest an amended and restated Agreement, In substantially the form on MG with the City Clark, together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the Cltj Attorney. Section 2. Apwl0)rj2Ant Q Diracfmr. The Cary Manager of the City, or hie designee, Is hereby appointed as the City's representative as Director Author;ty. of the Section 3. Otllcial Agtlons. The Mayor, the City Manager, any Assistant CRY Manager the Finance Director, the City Clerk gl the Cny and ell other officers proper of the Oily are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirrabla hereunder with respect to the formation of the Authority, Including but not limned to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, Instruments and other documents, which they, or any of them, may doem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this resolution. Secilon 4. Effective Date, This Resolution shell take enea from and after the date of Its passag= vnd adoption. r '. A' irr" jF N��tr CIT:' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE• January 10, 1991 TU Mayor and Memb:rs of the City Council FROM: Duane A. Baker, Assistant to the City Manager SUBJECt Cass on of a Re.oi t_ i n Ar thnd In¢ th Lease f 00 MN Co t ni orlon. at from the trJCr rte.I Communications Finandnr AuthoAty •nd th ,r�Sate or A nd. by the A uthoriL �, Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing the City to lease from the West End Communications Financing Authority the equipment necessary to implement the 800 MHz communications system for the City. The attached resolution would also autboi9ze the City to sublease to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District the necessary equipment to implement their portion of the 80o Mliz system. Finally, the attached resolution would authorize the Authority to sell bonds of which the City's Portion would tot exceed M,O10,000.00. Background: Past Council action authorized the City to initiate the establishment of a joint Powers Authority to help finance the City's and tho Fire District's portion of the Soo h1Hz cotnmualcatioas system. That IPA has ban forted and It is now time for the agencies to begin ordering the necessary egtdpmrnt to implement the system. The attached resolution will accomplish tbree tasks necessary for the JPA to Proceed with the necessary financing pia. The first task will be to establish a lease agreement between the City and the JpA. Tith will make it possible for the JPA to finance the project on behalf of the member •Seac!c; so that the related costs can be shared and thus redreeQ. Once the JPA has financed the equipment, the member agencies will make lease payme» is to the JPA so that they may have possession of the equipment end so that the JPA may service the debt. The second task accomplished by the resolution 13 crot.ting a sublease between the City and the Fire District., to order to keep costs down and obtalo a better rating for the bond Issue, the City will be participating In the bond sale on the District's behalf. The sublease will esiablieb the mechanism whereby the District will reimburse the City for the Districts portion of the financing. The final task accomplished by the resolution will be to approvc the sale of bonds by the JPA to acquire equipment for the 800 MHz system. The total bonds .a: 800 Mitz Report January 16, 1991 Page 2 to be sold by the JPA am not to exceed $10,420,000 with the City's portion not to exceed $2,010,000. The lease payments to the IPA will be made over ten years. Based on current estimates for the project, the payment schedule, not counting the Pirc District's portion, for the lease would be as follows: Because of the ultimate cost savings that can be obtained through the above procedure and the benefit that the g00 MHz system will provide the City, it Is rcenmmendcd that the City Council adopt the et:ached resolution, Re ectf 1 y Submitted, �d rX 11/3MO 0 VUM RESOLUTION NO. 91- d,?I RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE LEASING OF CERTAIN CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FROM THE WEST END COMMUNICATIONS FINANCING AUTHORrry, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT AND A SUBLEASE, APPROVING SALE OF BONDS AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT, AND AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL ACTIONS RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "city, as follows: WHEREAS, the City, the City of Chino, C 111fomia, the City of Ontario, California, and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (collectively, the'Membersl have heretofore entered Into a Joint Exercise of Powers AgreomeM dated February 21, 1990, as amended and restated on February 7, 1991, establishing the West End Communications Financing Authority (the "Authority") for the purpose, among others, of Issuing its bonds to be esed to provide financial assistance to the Members; end WHEREAS, the Authority proposes at this time to Issue its West End Communications Financing Authority 1991 Revenue Bonds, Series A (800 MHz Equipment Financing Projects) In an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $10,420,000 (the 'Bonds") for the purpose of providing funds to acquire certain communica0orm equipment for lease to the City (the "Projectl and to the other Members; and WHEREAS, Stone & Youngberg (the 'Underwriter-) has been directed to prepare a preliminary official statement containing information material to the offering and sale of the Bonds;and WHEREAS, the City has duly considered such transactions and wishes at this time to approve said tramactlons In the public Interests of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, It Is hereby ORDERED and DETERMINED, as fonows: Section 1 Anprovel of lasso of the Project from the Ai Lease Agreement, dated as of f 'Agreement'). The City Council Me with the City Clerk tcgethr necessary or advisable by the f Finance Director . The Mayor, Director Is hereby authorized an and directed to adest and affix it the name and on behalf of the Performance of the Agreement. Ufi The City Council hereby authorizes and approves the iority, pursuant to and In accordance with the terms of the rah 1, 1991, by and between the Authority and the City (the ereby approves the Agreement In substantially the form on with any additions thereto or changes therein deemed yor, the City Manager, any Assistant City Manager or the r Cly Manager, any Assistant City Manager or the FInance directed to execute, and the City Clerk Is hereby auhorized seal of the City to, the final forth of the Agreement for and In illy. The City Council hereby authorizes the delivery and Section 2. Ar roval of c ,hk= The City Council hereby authorizes and approves the sublease of a portion of the Project to the Rancho Ctramonga Fire Protection District (the DistdctJ pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Sublease, dated as of March 1, � �s 7 l 1901, by and between the City and the Dlgtdct (the *Sublease"). The CITY Council hereby approves the Sublease Sea therein Ildeeme form d n al file with the CMy Clerk together with any approves s thereto than edvlsabl Manager, any Assistant City Manager or the Finance Director The May, the Mayor. tho Manager, and execute ofinae City Clark is hereby anutiralzedrad direcied to a0est and affix the seal of the City to, the firtat lomt of the Sublease for and In the name and oa est a of the City. The City Counc9 herehy au0gdzes the delivery and performance of the Sublease. Sacgon 3. Sole M Qand The City hereby +yoprovos the sale of the Bonds by the Aulhodty by negotiailon vAth the Underwriter, so long as the aggregate Sods attributable to the City does not exceed long as a average raf a Inter of rate oil the Bonds does not exceed seven Percent (7%) 00, sr long al the average (merest Udsnvrherls dis,...:mt does not exceed one and OnO -half ercent (inl2gbad so tong as the SOV1017 4. Official Statement descdUW- the financing, substantially Council hereby approves the Preliminary Ing, ubstaanttiially Cre fam on file with me City Clerk the FinancehDirector, the C d any and all other officers of Ist City are hereby authorized and tilrecled, for and In the name and on behalf Of Clrs tO do Orly ty a e hereby and take any and all actions, I lCluding execution and ddhve y of any and affil asslpnmsntss, certificates, requisitions, agreements, nOL^M, consents, instruments of conveyance, wanants and other documents which they. or any of them, may doom necessary or advtsabfe ti 9rder to consummale the lawful Issuance and sale of the Bonds. SecsOn 6. EBecnva Date, This Resolution passage and adoption. shall fake effect from and after the date of ft the city Of Rancho Cucamonga l aatga M� edutodu maeti^gdjblef8^Opt hold on the 16th dayh of January. 1091, by the fonowin_ vote of the City Council: AYES, NOES: ABSENT: 43SIAINED: / -1p 49 By G.y Clerk —" Al a s I+ r; i — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r STAFF REPORT 4' DAT3: January 16, 1991 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, Nlep, City Manager FROM: Jerry B. FulWood, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: CONBIDERATION OF 8ELLCTION OI„ A DBLEOATE FOR TIIR 8AN EERNARDINO COVMTY -WIDE GANGS AND DRUGS TADS PORCH - The San Bernardino County -Vida Ga4gs and Drugs Task Force has been operational for a number,of years. The city of Rancho Cucamonga is a member of this task force. However, Rancho Cucamonga is not currently represented by an elected official as a mar-bar of this task force. Therefore, staff requests that City Council consider selecting a delegate for this task force. The task force meets the first Wednesday of the month at 7x30 a.a- in San Bernardino. JBF /tlr JBF:018 r Y. i .} tllr . San Bwardw CwTf0de GANGS &DRUGS TASK FORCE 655 EAstThird Street • Sm Bernardino. CA 926160081 -(714)387.3727 sun Abomaap Cae,A,e�. raw c4ktl.9nncck SAN BERNARDIINO COUNTYWIDE ca.,a=mber. Feaw GANGS & DRUGS TASK FORCE F~ Bekway PxW Poke Cxd Hr,* 9mm January 9, 1"1 sow MrA* 730 am - &45 am � um wawa. San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools TO' Hoka b 601 North "E" Street uewtlsuaewdno San Bernardino, California Da b Jd 1 Conference Rooms A & B n lk CarH=ber. ryd swo Munn Can9xraw Hcpxia onaYa YormeNr Carq Maki Asmrr Clause T. V,xnpnm A. 4Y12•IJLI . hadm CMt Rabefan Dena udwr uua 1. amuck Terrell me vffr EMd)arl 2. AdQyNona/A=oU -Chuck Tames Band Yxa",AXWVMkU5D Paa1tl MW" 3. Ap.71!➢k'xlnt MlnuWs -chuck Terrell Aoaa PabM 0. Ndn e. Trex... nj q= -Ray Ruckm uer"W"o eaema FW%VA c4LMY8 dd-%Q ro 1 a >I QBMAZl4111113t£ so8ww -dy�ow 1. CCrHSOies of Ate= -Qiuck Terrell ��ASr"O" et No-= . %7 2. Mlrslcn5lelement- Chuck Terrell Sw FCd Poke Mod 3. Coal, h jtdtyg{huck Terrell Bob Sftn2w Y.*abgwo C 8 WT+W CTrW S. Te lJr. CanyPgwyaw-deft I 2gling -Chuck Tmell rwid COM&Wddla 2. CQMMd rl ale -Ray Rutke: Hein YuWrw" Y"Aidaty 3. pundnisxr- Joanna]embus B76Cr11OOMMOq D. COMMITMREMM Jerry Earn �ha+tC+Oadelapaurre Butsawd 1. SttdHt.SRmmftft- D=ilsJohnson rosayCeMmaetayden Pad dv 2. Qh/er_a=9&mmllee-Ed Slout -..1 dAAvlo vase I rk,, Kamp Folddlck & 1'rFl/C Ff)A'rs+p((y)n rlp'rs. N 1. tu• -' K- ti _Submltic'd o byi MBurlon (salmon aeAlmuJ 2. IU33 Tu.ti freal fpd -te iYerk -k h - Subm'ttcd by john Barron (Essen aertloa) FUTURE MEETING DATE, - Wednesday, February F, 1491 Wcdnoday,,NIarr':6, 1991 Wednesday - 'MI 3,1991 Wednrv:ay, May 1,1991 r %ednesday,lune 5,1991 da yy 3,1991 Wednesday, August 9 1 Wednesday, September 4,1991 1 Wednesday, a2 i99 Wednesday, November 6, 1991 Wednesday, December 4,1991 AB mcedngr will be held at the San Berrurdlro County Shedffs Deputmamt. located at 655 Past Thlyd Stmt, Son Bcrrwrdlro, CaBfomla, unless aPwt othawlse. STANDING CC+AIIbIf'T'TEE Pascutive CmnnUttee Grant Conradltee Conference Carnmlltee Wmoutlon Publl Cmnadtta Flnance CGmrnittee Ad Jim Committee (Fundraalng) aN 'i SAN BERNARDINO COLTINTYWIDE GANGS & DRUGS TASK FORCE' January 9, 1991 7:30 am - &ASS am San Bezrwdino County Superiitendent of Sphools'. 601 NorVA "V, Street San Bemardlua, C4H(ornla Conference Roorni, . 13 ACENDA A. OPENUIM 1. IYZIMME-Chuck Terrell 2. Adg0Wn2LA=3dA-Chuck Terrell BF M RESOLVED that the agenda of the San Bernardino Cowtywide Gangs and Drup Task Force an January 9,1991, be, adopted as presented. 3. AppriijaisildimLhu-Chuck Terrell A BF rr RESOLVED that the December S. 1990, minutes of the San Bernardino CDunqwtde Gangs & Drugs Task Force be appnvm.dasph-Anted. Cblueaed[W 4. MxLjgrrfLHzmd-Ray Rucker The trmurces report will be reviewed. (amaty &%tctlon) B. WFQRN(AT1nNrrFM4 735 AM A 1. txckTcffeU be awarded to Carole lies -' wick, Charter Cbalrperson, Nat' Simon, Clisrter:'Vt�<hal�:',! . I -%g Terrell, , person. Charles S Jr., rtx Secretary, & well, Charter Treasurer. b. 2. MI"fon Star=nt -Chuck Terrell 11 bff551>]LISrAMM M The Can Bernardino Countywide Carmgs and Drugs Task Force is committed to a leadership rots In advoadng the prevention and suppression of gang membership and drug use throughout the County through coordination, collabontbn, and communication between education, the crbtdnal Justice system, elected officials, pnvate ent- -Trise, and the commurSty ahiargr. COOL a`AND ntttEMIM fSEYRParmTA$PA. r• sdn.nnn GOAL Improve the effectiveness of the Task Forms. OBJECTIVE Increase membership In the Task Form to Include representation from the medial profesxWn, vQdnal bar association, workplace, yomn, clergy, and treatment Adopt an expanded committee onrchme to distribute responsibilities and better define roles of the members. KEY ' J;'at1IT AREA: T,adrzshf$t GOAL provide "guidelines' for an effative prevention and suppression program to every Interested commudtym"mw,.y. OBJECTVE EngAgea full-time person to serve as an Execudve DlrMor. Develop gu1C dr s that can be used to assist Interested communities In developing ps, nd drug prevention And suppressions strategies tailored to their Individual needs. Fublldu and market the development and avallablllty of the gddelLnes tocoumtycom nun Wes R.TAREAtAdvogcX GOAL Bring In other constituencies. Establish a legislative committee. Establish a speakrtrs' bureau with emphasis on suppression & prevention. Conduct a Youth Leadership Conference with a Council of Youth on Gangs G [hugs evolving. ` Cain designation as a Floral Impact Arun /31 Page 2 W, 1CPVRP ULT RPA, Cgrn,urtIcatim COAL WLntalnomnrntumofcwegoup. Recruitment - Expand mtmbmhlp to include all cities Advise nonmember of acdviles regularly. Publicize within mn nunity and to public aPluge. KFVR7.-e MTAARPA- Call.iMndnn GOAL Involve all 22 cides In the Task Fora wltisin 12 months ` Fundralsmg - Leal, regional, celebrity. C. CIMRENTAC)1VrTTEq AND REK)RIS 7•5e A M I. $yajpg —Chuck Terrell This u a time where the Task Fora members have an opportunity to share programs and activities taking place In their city or organization that may be of interest to the other mmJ ems 2. Commenter Uodelo—lLeny Rucker An update on the computer "em will be presented. 3. EWWnj1[3`Joanna )CalWss A proposed fundraber In n njunction with the opening of the new JAL• will be explored. D. --rm B:iCA.N. Each submmmllow chair will give an update on the suns of their coounittm 1. Grant Comenrttteti0ermis Johnson 2. Conferenm Committee —Ed Stout 3. Public lnfonnatton Co mitt .Karen Fosdick E. MMER rreA: FOR THE GOOD OFTHE OMM AAO AM 1. luvenlleI RIM LC011adooha dolt— Suhmllted by John Burton (salmon stollen) 2. Illymile (..tied ICAI 1 •te Wnr •boob ndOW— Submitted by John Burton (green section) /.3 t�— Page 3 t r 1s f, 5 FLrrURE MEEI1NG DATES Wednesday, Febnwy 6,1991 Wednesday, March 6,1991 Wednesday, April 3,1991 Wednesday, May 1, 1991 Wednesday, June 5,1991 Wednesday, July 3,1991 Wednesday, August 7,1991 Wednesday, September 4,1991 Wednesday, October 7,1991 Wednesday, No�w*w 6,1991 Wednesday, December 1,1991 All meetings will be held at the San FCmlardino County Sheriffs Department, bated at 6SS Fast Third Stmt San Bernardino, Callfor.*, unless stated otherwise STANDING COhQ ITIFEFS Executive Committee Grant Committee Conference Committee Legislative Committee Public Information Committee finance Committee Ad Hoc Committee (purdraWng) l33 Page 4 ,f 0 �n pAo OAA aj r e Y OF RANCHO CUCAMOIVGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 1991 TO Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager rA Pe SU13WP CONSIDERATION TO DEVELOP A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL WMCIi WILL REVIEW THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PLAN I.EVIEW, PERMIT ISSUANCE, AND INSPEC11ON SERVICES RECOMMENDATION: To appoint a subcommittee of the City Council to work with the City Manger's office in developing a Request For Proposal so that a review of the plan review, pemdt issuance and inspect —n services can be prepared encompassing both the City and the Flre D, -uict. BACKGROUND: At the time of budget discussions and npproval for Fire Safety relocating to the City Hall facility, staff discussed amongst themselves the benefits of a consultant to review the coordination of plan check and plan review procedures within the City and �the Fire District. The goal behind such an analysis was to evaluate plan review and permit issuance processes, define roles and responsibilities, and to make recommendations where improvement zould occur Recently, the City Council initiated discussions relating to the efficiency and effectiveness of inspection services within the Building and Safety Division. Because inspection services and the development process are integrated, involving many departments, it is suggested that a study be conducted which analyzes the effectiveness of the complete delivery of development process and inspection services. ANALYSIS: Paraphrasing the prefacr. and intent of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) it has been established and is dedicated to the development of better bniiding construction and greater safety to the public by uniformity in building laws. The UBC is founded on broad L° r" p based performance principles that make possible the use of now d materials and new construction systems. Paraphrasing the preface of the Uniform Fire Code (UFC) shows that the intent is to correlate the Provisions of both the UBC and UFC so that there is no conflict between them. Neither code is Intended to stand alone; rather the total package will 3ive cities and counties a complete and comprehensive program of model codes that are compatible with each other. As the Council is aware, the UBC and the (JFC deal not only with inspections but with plan development and review as well. For this reason it may be more beneficial to gain a complete review of the delivery of development and inspection services. This will allow any recommendations for Improvement to be balanced by their impact to other departments and other procedures already established. The 9031 of a report such as this could be: Analyze plan review, Permit issuance and Inspections services so that it achieves the goals of the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code. This would include an audit of the organizational structure to determine acceptable standards for proper delivery of plan review, permit issuance and Inspection services. In considering the acceptable standards, the report should focus on, but not be limited to, frequency of inspections, turn around times of reviews, thoroughness, comparison to nationally recognized practices, additional reasonable inspection procedures needed to address the overall decline of construction practices in the Industry, and roles and areas of responsibility, for all stages of construction, enforcement and maintenance. Included in the report would be recommendations of how to improve the various aspects of the services involved. These recommendations would be in three areas: those dealing with plan review and permit issuance, those dealing with inspection services, and those that are necessary to make the integration of the services compatible. There are several firms which staff has researched which advertise experience in preparing this type of report. Following is a list of firms that could be included in any mailing of a Request For Proposal. Other firms or individuals may also be available `eyond this initial r list. Staff will continue to research potential consultants who provide ? ?; the type of service desired. y. Pacesetter Mumcipul Services Inc. Mathis & Associates DGA Consultants Inc. ICBO/Westem Fire Chiefs RSM & Associates Hughes, Heiss & Associate Ralph Anderson & Assoc Tomes Van Rickley & Assoc. Included with the RFP response will be the firms estimation of the amount of money to complete the report desired by the City Council. The subcommittee designated by the Council could review the proposals and make a recommendation which would consider cost, qualifications and depth of the report desired. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Deputy City Manager 137 ' ;1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January IS, 1991 TO: M -yor and Members of the City Council FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE CREATION OF A CITIZENS' TA,•K FORCE ON LIBRARY SERVICES, TO ASSIST STAFF AND CONSULTANTS IN THE PREPARATION OF A LIBRARY MASTER PLAN. RECOMMENDATION: It R recommended that tho City Council authorize the creation of a "Citizens' Task Force on Library Services" to assist In the development of the Master Plan of Library Services. BACKGROUND: At the joint meeting of the City Council and Parks and Recreation Commission on Oca.her 24, 1990, the Council expressed a desire to create a "Citizens' Task Force on Library Services" in order to obtain public Input to, aid review of, the Muster Plan for Library Services which will be prepared by Raymond M. Holt, Library Consultant. ANALYSIS: As part of thu preparation of the Mauer Plan, the City Council directed the consultant to consider the types and emphases of programs and services that should be offered thrt gh a library facility. In order for the consultant to understand the needs the residents related to library services, and include that t.i put the Master Plan, it is recommended that a task force be created to assist In that portion of the Plan. The consultant will include recommendations for current services and programs to the City Council, as well as future programs that should be considered as the demographics and trends in library science change. The proposed Citizens' Task Force should be representative of the community's library users. It is recommended that delegates from the following groups be invited to participate in the Task Force: City J Council; Park and Recreation Commission; Friends of the Library; and all five local school districts. Additionally, invitations will be sent to all applicants for City Commissions, and any resident who has indicated a willingness to serve In the City's volunteer program. Staff also recommends that the Task Force be advertised, soliciting additional interest from the community. Those who indicate interest in the Task Force will be interviewed by the Central Park Sub - Committee, and final recommendations brought to the City Council for approval. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager F A ■ �_: a Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE, January 15, 1991 TOt mayor and Membors of the City //y/ Council PROMS Jan Sutton, Deputy City Clem SUBJECTS LTHCOLM PROP21ST3RQ APPRIJ. F Mr. Armando Sanchez, a remidont of the Victoria Tract, telephoned the City manager's office today regarding the Lincoln Properties appeal of vesting Tentative Tract 14630, item number two under Advertised Public Hoaringe on the January 16, 1991 City Council agenda. Mg. Eanchet stated he would be unable to attend the public hearing in person, and wanted it to be known that he was opposed to the proposed dovelopment of candominiums on this corner. He left -hie work telephone number, 213 -933 -8341, if anyone desired any furthor Information of him. /m cc, Jack Lam James Markman Cobra Adams F a l -• �e X35 5/29/00 1 To p'anned apartment complex built to condominium standa ds. 1) I /we are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and live In the area of Baseline and Milken Avenues. I /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are ooposed to the proposed plan by Uncoln Developers of San Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast comer of Milliken and Baseline Avenues. DATE 53 D I / NAME 4cCe'i ADDRESS / 05 ui PHONE # 9ys - /S8/ 5/-31/90 1 re/MiC,r Dd oS (jerlovq- 945 -1S8-1 531 44N�aj ?J&/ � S ,&-131130, .4 M I vo L ✓r an t 5c 3 ✓n /�I �c Sir -)d(nP ' J art . Fao••>vc ct/ is' b 4 9D f1�nt7�2, I Iii w >�� +y141(ti t� of rf ti� r Aa t,iu 11333 6CN0Vh Cn k(410--o , pp oTkoj 1131 &C-oaJh- rzo AHY "I•7-At -L II'a2o 6-e0ow} 2d 9y$ -9777 fo o GI de beuyi _ 14 re -r 1 to 5/29/'90 To planneu apartment complex bulft to condominium standards. 1) I /we are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and live in the area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. I /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposed to the proposed plan by Uncoln Developers of San Diugo, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast comer of Milliken and Baseline Avenues. DATE - f- 9 NAME (3-5� h ADDRESS if o 4, PHONE 9 W - - / -911 r t 6 -3 s;L nka& All q i f6 98�F5- - ffq14,j an I14V6rrj6Vc, -T- u� Sri J J�Y7r GPaot� qtr— 1616 c oYl Q.46 D3• p �„+, our7S /q .5 ln6nroJq Rqi G7 /I -3- 0 N 011AJ vsAN& kr f(4-33 . ,VVL 9cr / -0 1, -3 -90 1t`lL? C,ov,. CC> 6 _3 '90 7Ca 36rf 6 9P 9A-61 r0 ll )) a ? vVZ �3 90 X353 MA J41-1q0 (4-3- _ vu -9�t &L, A—,, ,, .-3 -�-7 71s�r Jkb� dQ2q Piyrcrvf /�L %/}(- 0l'!7� Ra s /2s /so 3 To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. 1) I /we ere residents of Rancho Cucamonga and dve In die area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. 1 /tva are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposed to the proposed plan by Ilncoln Developers of San Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast comer of MNken and Baseline Avenues. Ac-n�F 5/29/90 PETITION "P.POSMON To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. 1) I /wo are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and We in Via are.. of Ba;erine and Milliken Avenues. I /wo are the Dgal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposed to the proposed plan by Uncoln Developers of San Diego, CA for 350 apartments on the Northeast comer of M1113Cen end Baseline Avenues. VDATE NAME ADDF0SS PHONE t 617 V % t Arf 1 �p 9 D e f4 fa /: %014 i a n o / L 6 r} yi b R -9v 3J.fU qU�f -C4 — t — — .L rr, 3 -. . 5/29/90 S To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. t) I /we are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and live In the area of Bassline and Milliken Avenues. I /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /wa are opposed to the proposed ;Yen by Uncoln Developers of Srui Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast comer of Milliken and Basellm Avenues. DATE `5 - `I'- NAME Mt#/Ziv ILL ADDRESS PHONE # ;.Oe- lls��' oU9 95K6 -gs97 y 9� 1111VIA1 / s /371r Qyd /o /fo 1�i,1 •'- 1 5/29/90 Y PEEM QN OF OPPOSITION To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. 1) I /we are residents of Rancho Cucamcmga and live in the area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. I /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposed to the proposed plan try Unooln Developers of San Diego, CA for 356 apertments on the Northeast comer of Milliken and Baseline Avenues. DATE 1 NAME ADDRESS { PHONE # S�3o /� �yf !1797 Veyo�a 99( 7 /`lL 1 l I 7757 I m r ° LtRHO Fi 9�1,_a -G�3 a I_ G 1 -1 (1 ✓ ^1... k.;) , r�.(lJ rib 6 --V q' v (1V^(1, 11 4 t -3 23 /- 30 d G i, __a ��`aI -51zt (0-190 � i 113St� ✓Grtonlnpz. 911s -583s l>• I 1qc) IZA 6ct. 1131 1 v' cc tl -'7 9 za i 1 I I aaK� Szz` 6 W 44 - /y/ i /i20 „la� tqtl - `l q4 ...,n 9 6 5/29/90 pEfmO:iOF ERQ%IMN To planned apartment complex buL't to condominium standards. I) I /via aru residents of Rancho cucsmonga and Ave in the area of Base9na er•.d Milliken Avei vas Ywe are the legsI owno's of the undersigned .ddress. 2) I /we e;e oppoksd to the proposed plan by Uncoln Dmrelupers of San Diego, CA for :456 f ap mmM i Nprtheasj comer of Milliken and Bass a Avenues. DATE ADDRESS \36n u PHONE 4 t 11' u r 0 3 e/�0 3 76 Moya"l br. 71 r/ 9 / "G S�YG1 ju e �r lu,�c SGCI /! 3 76 5-/13 J /N 6 L I�cle /w J /7� /Y ff Y67S S 30 90 Gr, K+D tfe nTav ee'ob PWO-f{..o PL t7ttl� V 4 ^L ica Z 430 o ' r 27 Z Ps�CIMe fY �l ^!12 / 3 0 /40 orl,J L4 ce,j a v P 'rraJ Pe !"-wya '.`6510 RIVC.; ,w -5-/Yo/ YO 541 / *•0 �.F. ✓0�.�•G c4eb 14 /�3�rS l/.i/,rvA OIL 7,9 )1,1•'jyf'-5�5� �, a to vpro r / -a DI 7/U - q 513,bp "Mcc 2a, 1f33'i "Aa Or 7n1. 441 -rya► — I ovo u tkora I — 2 (9 _ 5/29/90 0 ('E MON OF rl POMOu J `'o planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. f f • f f 1) I /we are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and We in the area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. I /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposed to the proposed plan by Lincoln Devotopers of San Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast comer of Makken and Baseline Avenues. DATE I NAME I ADDRES3 I PHONE # s� - tiy- 9S/L rr -r cr adOLOCtI f, //pp � r r.n rr rr �. •�' O hr-+. ef%uiir, 11) 116nr Qhv: a--7u/ p ✓n 9�B 02 .u� t�tm_ % -S90 itS� 3 bcv; 1�, 7tv 94S iSBN 6_L-5O �/lcasr I!Si� Plae. �ry)9si -a7oE 6'�0 tMA GHt"/31 oho V6TTen/o 7 /4_U47—hi, .u� t�tm_ 5/29/9 To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. 1) I /wo are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and live in the area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. I /we vro the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposed to the proposed plan by Unooln Developers of San Diego, CA for 359 apartments on the Northeast comer of MMen and Baseline Avenues. DATE NAME ,4 ADDRESS 1�07 -,qPQF PHONEIF 7rs� 9S�rf/9%f (b 5/29/90 PEEMON OF OPPOSRION To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. 1) I /we are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and We In the area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. ) /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposed to the proposed plan by Lincoln Developers of San Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast comer of Milliken and Baseline Avenues. DATE I NAME I ADDRESS ' PHONE # b -3 -90 G-S-Y a 6 -s -fc ism? lFi L: --2(i /f lo+wD G- � - ga�ivAsee ,eAO '� yo3 g �A�T qyf�.� =s /a. -7 -_ vc =C-1004? nsTb NIWOa f AK R (7fJ 787 -8317 � j pri I-U % 1946 A &APOUt r; ., 44d -4 0 4AITOA110 2 /1080 OCK ,SUX4, CT o.t A r 7rr{'- IFS- /3/ L 71ST S- 6' S -po �R7 ii aaaEKn.r4 R G-S-Y a 6 -s -fc ism? lFi L: --2(i /f lo+wD G- � - ga�ivAsee ,eAO '� yo3 g �A�T qyf�.� =s /a. -7 -_ vc 5/29/90 !( Porno OF DEPOSMON To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. 1) I /wo are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and Ova In the area of Baseline and Mimen Avenues. I /we are ft legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposod to the proposed plan by Uncoln Developers of San Diego, CA for 358 apartments on the Northeast comer of Milken and Baseline Avenues. PE�ION of oarocmoN ' To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. K 1. My 5/29/90 /1 1) I /we are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and We In the area of Baseline and M an Avenues. I /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) Irwe are opposed to the proposed plan by Lincoln Developers of San Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast corner of M iken and Basopne Avenues. I" 1 e 5/29/90/3 PEnnoN OF�m To planned apartment complex bukt to condominium standards. �) [/we are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and five In the area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. I /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposed to the proposed plan by Uncoh Deve:opers of San Diego, CA for 358 apartments on the Northeast cornsr of M8lacen and Baseline Avenues. DATE NAME REM FfiONE # D y ! "o s/ u A l�/�AN QAl lc a A G /9a lac. JAIAe-y,¢�e WSp Linn lc r'/• /S x/98 _ Zt •°y` - 9 - Aso N5A4 Sg D Llm r _ G S-70 l p!n 6 1.53 nano t�- J •I �/i Pr' ! gJ'! ja KIITNJ�' � '�N/ t"y 5/29/90/1( To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. 1) I /we are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and We in the area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. 1 /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) 1 /we are opposed to the proposed plan by Uncoln Developers of San Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast comer of MgGken and Baseline Avenues. s /2s /so /S To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. 1) I /we are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and live in the area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. I /we are the legal owners of the undetsigned address. 2) I /w3 are opposed to the proposed plan by Uncoln Developers of San Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast corner of Milliken and Baseline Avenues. c M, i,., PEITTi[:N Q OPI,DSITInf,� To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. 1) 1 /we are residents of Rancho CucaMnga and five In the area of easellne and Milliken Avenues. I /wo are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposed to the proposed plan by Lincoln Developers of San Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the NOftheasl comer of Milliken and Baseline Avenues. i I-, r 5/29/90` y PETITION OF OPPOSITION To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. 1) I /we are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and live In the area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. I /we are the Jegal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposed to the proposed plan by Lincoln Developers of San Dlego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast comer of Willilcen and Baseline Avenues. 1� t t r V� 5/29/90 t.g PEII ION OP OPPORmON To p!snned apartment comp!ax built to condominium standards. 1) I /we are esidents of Rancho Cucamonga and five In the area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. I /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I/ we are opposed to the proposed plan by Uncoln Developers of San Diego. CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast corner of Milliken and Baseline Avenues. DATE NAME D ADDRESS PHONE # Fr Lkf& fl/,teP I8� — /iloL8 �' ` ob, elr• ss o P t 829 - 339 . =' 5/29//990 [ I To planned apartment complex built to condominium standards. t) I /we are residents of Random Cucamonga and We in the area of Baseline and Milliken Avenues. I /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address 2) 1 1wP are opposed to the proposed plan by Uncoln Developers of San Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast corner of Milken and Baseline Avenues. DATE NAME ADDRESS PHONE 0 69-23 90 0/a U /,dAQGnlaq Pd /.1 -'14 9 t 71-vx - -d3- L° // d .At , .. io �3 I D i em SKCSr Il t}1�k . -- (p a 3� e> =e,uA naA 1140 Ecmt • A 46/y 9' ' (o %eRJ 0 2 d T, ,iv7o 10 U ka i'77a n�i 11$16(f tN0. hi, �vY 9�/r- t.7 X17 OIAEG vt IIJ.S7 o RO -!t d/ -6$'13 t 'l z3 90 A. „ r , to Q�•� IfAR01.41t AAMAI 47s leknr Ptil -7, _ - A, 7iy- 9?9/9518 r xt x• ■, i . s PETMON OF OPPOSITION To planned apartment complex built to rnndomnium standards. R R C R •A 1) I /we are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and rive in the area o! Easefine and Milliken Avenues. 1 /we are the legal owners of the under-Igned address. 2) I /we are opposed to rite proposed plan by Lincoln Developers of San Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast comer of MGriken and Baseline Avanuas. DATE NAME ADDRESS PHONE # m-U�90 uL HIM 660o iQ n 9 ply - 8•S1! S 9,s -oo- I yT'. M 5/29/00 -9-( PETMON OF OPPOSMQN TO planned apartment complex bwt to condomhUrn standards. 1) I /wo are residents of Rancho Cucamonga and We In the area of Baseline and M19(en Avenues. I /we are the legal owners of the undersigned address. 2) I /we are opposed to the proposed plan by Lincoln Devolopors of San Diego, CA for 356 apartments on the Northeast comer of Milliken and Baseline Avenues. .t January 16, 1991 City Council - Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Propored Apartments for Corner of Milliken h Baseline Tentative Tract #14630 Dear Members of the City Council: I am writing t' state my opposition to the above mentJened project proposed by the Lincoln Property Co. I have many concerns that contribute to my contention with the project. They era as follows: 1. I am opposed to the high level of density throughout the community I hate to see Rancho Cucamonga become primarily an apartment community. I believe that our community would be much healthier if the density ratio were kept lower 2. I would rather have owner occupied multi - family units at this location. ' 3. I am concerned-with the density of the proposed project itself. I believo it is toe high to blend well with the adjacent neighborhoods. I also believe that the density of the project will contribute to the crime rate and traffic In the area. 4. I am very worried about the impact this project will have on our already overcrowded schools. Children in the area are presently being bused to alternate schools due to lack of schools and overcrowding. 5. I am very disappotnted with the architecture of the proposed project. I do not feel it will blend well with the adjacent neighborhoods. It was disclosed that laundry hookups, for unite which would have r them, could not be on tho interior, but on the - balconies I am under the Impression that the Library and other facilities planned for the adjacent park are to be landmarks showcaaing our community. - If built as proposed, will this project be compatible with these plans? 1 think not. ' As the council is probably aware, resident, of the adjacent neighborhoods met with the developer on several occasions. Residents presented the developer, with a list of proposed changes for the project Althou3h some items were addressed, oth,rs were not. Attached, enclosed garages were requested. All garages we a changed fro, carports around the exte.•Sor of the project to enclosed garages. I believe this adds to the safety of the project, buc detracts from the visual appeal. When .coking at otu,r similar completed projects In the area, what you see Is lor•g single story buildingc that box in the complex and Flock the views to any open spaces provided it, the interior Another request was for single -story unite on the exterior graduating to two -story units on the interior, in order te, blond with the look and spirit of the adjacent areas No such changes were made. Another suggestion was to Provida plenty of guest parkang to the interior of the project, again to Promote the residential loak rather than that of apartments. Again, no such changes were made I would ask that you pay close attention to these and the m.ny other concerns expressed by members of the commualty. I hope you uphold the unanimous vote, by the P1 c,ing Cc:misalo,., against this proposed project. Sincerely, 1 16 y � Carol H Dougle 11463 Genova Rd. Alta Loma, CA 91701 cc Dennis Stout, Mayor Diane Williams, Mayor Pro -Tom Charles Ouquet, Councllmember William Alexander, Councllmember Pamela Wright, Councllmember T� 31 y , rIt - ■ Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATES January is, 1992 TOt Mayor and Members of the City Council '• FROMt Jan Button, Deputy City Clern � Al-� RODJRCTt LrHQDLX PROF Hr. Armando Rancher, a resident of the Victoria tract, telephoned the City a Mnager's office today regarding the Lincoln Properties appeal of vesting Tantativo Tract 14630, item number two under Advertised Public Hearings on the January 16, 1991 City Council agenda. Mr. Rancher stated he would be unable to attend tb, public hearing in person, and wanted it to be known that he was opposed to the Proposed development of oc�dominiums on this corner. He left his work telephone number, 313 -933 -8341, if anyone desired any further Information of him. to cc, Jack Lam James Markman Debra Adams :1 9 = .ess e r• t a' r I, t, yete�'� Aaoms CITY OF RANCHO tn;CAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 14, 1991 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council and,�ity Manager FROM: Jerry Grant, Building Official �c.r�}., SUBJECT: ACCOMPANYING STAFF REPORT ;/ � e r- Enclosed, please find Staff Report for Item I -t on the City Council Agenda, as was indicated to the agenda packets. The report should be inserted following page 133. Thank you for your patience in this issue. JRG /kes Enclosure r �i N ..,.. REPORT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF ' w DATE January 16, 1991 TO: Mayor, Members of City Council and City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Jerry R. Grant, Building Official SUBJECT: FIRE PLACE CDMSTIG)CTIDN - 10121 KEWM)OD CT. - MR. a MRS. ROBERT FLORES ABSTRACT: This report has been prepared to review circumstances that surfaced as a result of investigation of a fire that occurred at the home of Mr. & Mrs. Flores. It will outline specific omissions in achieving code compliance at the subject site, some possible reasons for those omissions, and how these construction deficiencies are to be corrected, both in the short and long terms. BACKGROUMD: At the regular City Council meeting of January 2, Mr. and Mrs. Robert Flores addressed the City Council concerning a fire that occurred at their home, located at 10121 Kernwood Ct., and raiszd questions concerning the construction of the fireplace that contributed to the ignition of subfl ooring and framin; members. In extinguishing the firs, the responding engine company partially dismantled the fireplace firebox and hearth extension revealing the cause of the fire. After removal of the brick in those areas, it became apparent that the fire had ignited the raised wood floor and framing members that were in direct contact with the fire brick lining at the front area of the firebox floor, rather than being separated by masonry and /or air space as required by the building code. In simple terms, the heat from the firebox ignited the underlying raised wood floor members Because this occurred beneath the floor, the fire was not detected until it started to burn through the floor adjacent to the fireplace. The Building and Safety Division was first contacted by Mrs. Flores on the morning of December 26, 1990. Jim Martin, Plan Check Coordinator, Jim Thomas, Building Inspectien Supervisor and myself responded that afternoon by visiting the site and reviewing the fire ares. Our conclusions were, from the conditions observed, that deficiencies in the construction of the fireplace had led to the fire as described above. 4 =' FIRE PLACE CONSTRUCTION - 10121 KERNw000 CT. City Council Agenda January 16, 1991 Page 2 The subdivision, 1ncl.ding thr Flores' residence, was constructed by Mayflower- Sayoun Development Co, and consists of eighteen homes, seven of them constructed with raised wood- framed floors. These seven homes are all locatzd on the south side of Kernwood and apparently utilized the raised word floors to avoid extensive grading to the site. The remaining homes have concrete slab floors and, therefore do not have the potential for the type of mishap that occurred in the Flores' house. After an initial survey of conditions at the Flores' residence, several other neighboring, wood -floor houses were also investigated. Preliminary inspection of tne.r underfloor areas showed similar construction, leading to the concl.•sion that, very likely, all of the fireplaces of houses with raised floors are improperly constructed. Accordingly, all of the owners of raised -•loor homes were immediately notified of the potential, requesting they refrain from using their fireplaces until a complete investigation could be made and /or necessary repairs accomplished. During the course of this inspection, it was also noted that none of the underfloor areas were provided with required, underfloor ventilation openings. On Thursday, January 3, Jim Martin and I met with Mr. John Bayoun, his attorney, and the framing and masonry subcontractors net to view the damage at the Flores' house, we then compared the construction of an adjacent vacant house and returned to the civic center for discussion of methodology for repairs and scheduling of corrective work. Mr. Bayoun, his attorney, and the masonry contractor acknowledged their responsibilities and agreed to schedule all corrective work as soon as possible. However, to framing contractor disclaimed responsibility for any part of the problem. It was agreed that the responsibility for framing would be resolved at a later time, rather than delay repairs. consultingyengneer, JamesnMartin,Cand myselflmetifir .tiFloreshoatrthelFlores House to provide an overall inspection of accessible areas of the house to determine the existence of any additional deficiencies. Besides tie Previously noted deficiencies, it was observed that a length of plywood sheathing n Interior wall of thnderflor crawlspace Shown ad been treplaed with diagonal a braces. and there wereeaunumberoof lumber scraps that should have been removed from the underfloor area. Other than the fireplace and ventilation Issues mentioned earlier, these were the only code related deficiencies noted. In addition, several of the electrical receptacle outlees were noted to be loose and in need of adjustment, an unusual amount of Insulation had been left in the underfloor crawl space, and there was evidence of leakage at a rear window. A review of the attic area showed nothing unusual about the roof structure. A report from Mr. Sullivan Is forthcoming at the time of preparation of this report and should be available for the City Council meeting. AMALTSIS: A. Inspector Oversights: to order that It may be understood how oversights of this type miglL have occurred, and been "overlooked' by the inspection staff, it 1s necessary to understand the process of inspection currently utilized by the City and sanctioned by state and national code enforcement agencies. 1,. ..s FIRE PLACE CONSTRUCTION - 10121 KERNW000 CT. City Council Agenda January 16, 1991 Page 3 Except for public school buildings, hospitals, and certain 'essential' facilities constructed by governmental agencies in California, inspection of buildings on a national basis is conducted at certain phases during the construction process. This is standard practice under the Uniform Building Code since its original publication in 1927. In specific relation to fireplaces, there are two basic types; factory -built prefabricated units, and on -site built masonry fireplaces. The vast majority of those installed today, particularly in tract development, are of the prefabricated type, because installation is less labor intensive. Factory -built fireplaces are normally Inspected a single time during construction; at framing inspection stage. On the other hand, because much of a masonry fi r.pl ace is concealed from view during construction, we, by department policy. Inspect at three additional stages in the case of masonry units. Unfortunately, the stage at which the improper construction took place was not a point at which we inspect. The area of the fireplace under which ignition occurred was built between inspection stages. It is true, in this Instance, that at certain unrelated inspection visits, there was potential to observe certain aspects of the fireplace construction that could have offered clues to the change and need for further review, but inspection attention at those times would have been concentrated on the items of called inspection. In the case of the subject tract, plans indicated that houses of the same model as the Flores' were to have prefabricated units, but the balance of houses in the subdivision were to utilize job -built masonry units. Sometime early in the development process, the fireplaces in the one model were changed to masonry. We have no record of this change from the approved plan, and have been unable to learn specifically how and when the order to change occurred. Correctin 0 flciencies to the Subdivision: At the time of writing this report we have not yet received a ?final schedule of work for correction of deficiencies. Mr. Bayoun has thus far been very communicative. During discussions on January 10, he stated he had arranged yith his contractors to perform all repairs but would wait for a report from Building 6 Safety regarding the findings of Robert S- ollivan, consultinc engineer, and the independent analysis performed L. the framer concerning any additiorwil deficiencies at the Flores house. He indicated that at the receipt of that information he would schedule an appointment with division, staff to acquaint his framing contractor with necessary repairs and develop a schedule for repair. The Flores have indicated their intention to proceed with necessary reoairs on their own house, using their own contractor in coordination with their insurance company. FIRE PLACi CONSTRUCTION - 10121 KERNWOOD CT. City Council Agenda January 16, 1991 Page 4 C. Action Plan: Accordingly, it is the intention of the Building and afet�sion to undertake the following corrective action: 1. We will Address the issue of incorrect fireplace construction by implementing additional inspection of masonry fireplaces at the floor level for homes with raised wood floors. 2 We will implement additional training sessions to develop habitual peripheral attention rather than focused inspections. 3. We will examine other areas of the construction process for potential trouble spots that may warrant additional inspection scheduling. 4. We will explore the potential of transitloning to a 4roader, but more specialized system of inspection in order to achieve closer scrutiny and subsequently better code compliance. StINART: A number of factors have contributed to the inability of inspection agencies to maintain the level of safety expected and deserved by the public. These Include added areas of Inspection responsibilities by state and local agencies, increasing complexities of construction methodology, deterioration of the quality of workmanship, and expertise of construction tradesmen. Those factors that previously have been attained as a result of construction simplicity, industry diligence, and worker training and knowledge, are no longer being accomplished and, further, are not within our immediate ability to change or control. This occurrence at the Flores' home has solidifled the realization that our current inspection and training programs require expansion to address changes that are taking place in the Industry. We request these Issues be considered in the pending study of ,Ian review, permit, Lnd inspection services. Respectfully Submitted, Jer R.�'�� Building OPfic lal RG /JRG /kes 1=i i i Y 1 ':i r • � of 1. �fifyt a (714) 948.8578 (Bue.) j (714) 946 -4924 (FAX) R. SULMAiN & ASSN CIATES Engineering 8 Codes Consultants January 15 1991 Jerry Grant Building Official 9320 Baseline Rd Rancho Cucamonga. Calif 91730 9e 10121 kernwcod Ct R C Dear Mr Grant. Regariing our inspection of the above residence on 1 -10 -91 it appeared to me that the framing work was generally of good quality e,ceot for the following conditions: I) the fireplace hearth was impiaper., constructed which ,esulted rn the burning of the floor members, 21 ventilation of the underfloor area was omitt6d. it appeared that the center wall in the underfloor area may be improperly braced My recommendations are as follows: 1) the fireplace hearth should be reconstructed to cantilever a minimum of 20 inches from thu face of the fireplace into the room. This hearth should be a minimum of 4 inches thick concrete and should contain reinforcing steel which is doweled back into tha existing fireplace. Inasmuch at this will create a weakened joint where the new concrete Joins the existing, it is recommended that a new masonry wall be built to extend from the foundation to support tie new hearth so that the length of the cantilever portion o' the hearth is no greater than 6 inches in any directlor 21 underfloor vents should be installed, 902 W. NINTH STREET a UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91786 W. J 71 _, the bracing of the underfloor wall may be a field change ,. and may be adequate as constructed, It is recommended that the project engineer be con:U:Led to determine if { additional bracing 9s needed i Please ccntact me if I can be of any further assistance, (oars Truly Ober[ R S.illlvan, P E QS/l, f.t, r .f' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAAIONOA IOfCOCIN,C.uuDb,,►aln4orut0l n. m.ufi x.wbGr,.wp.C.W,.,1, 1i r]I Flu 1111�f111{1p January 14, lgel Mr, and Mrs. Robert Flores 10121 Kernwood Court Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91701 SUBJECT: RESULTS OF INSPECTION, JANUARY 10, 1991 Dear Mr, and Mrs. Finr... In accordance with your request, we are providing you this letter which outlines the observations made during the above referenced inspection. Items requiring axtention are identified as follows: FIREPLACE: In order to restore the fireplace to a correct, usable and safe condition, thu 1, 011owing basic steps must be followed: 1. Remove all combustible framing within, and below, the hearth extension area to the existing foundation. This Will include 411 charred wood, however, need not include wood simply blackened by smoke. 2. Properly frame the hearth opening and reconstruct hearth extension from the foundation up. Reinforcing steel for the reconstructed hearth extension must tie into axisttng rasonry. 3. The existing water and waste plumbing lines within and immediately adjacent to the fireplace must be repaired. Tha existing gas lines within the house must be repaired if necessary, retested and inspected. 4. Remove and replaca fintsh brick facing providing a suitable tie in to t he remaining masonry. S. Remove and replace any floor sheathing charred from the i fire. UNDER -FLOOR AREA 1. Remove ail remaining construction debris, including excess insulation, wood cuttings, etc. Na' WiCIa'AJA4aWa Cw.r¢..µy lulls Srgn. n.amN w.am" aria J. Bu9.w4 C k.....r _ Pu..1l1 Letl.� ire .i I Flores /January lo, 1991 Inspection January 14, 1991 page 2 2. Install under -floor ventilation equal to 1 square foot of vent area for each 150 square feet of under -floor area'. (It appeared that the vent 's io oponln9s were fram and subseq uentl y covered with exterr lath a framed nd stuccoed 3. A review of the plant after the inspaction revealed the inst4•iga4,fon 0fr'dia9gnal bracing along the inside u 0 der- floor cripple YAl,l,rather than plywood as indicated on thm• construction, plans. This substitution appears to have 11tt14 e,f�ept on the structural .igtegrity of the home', however, unless "this change 1a substantiated by a licensed engineer, the plywood extending 23 feet in length; as specified ou the apprevea Plans, must be installed. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS The dnder•floor and miscellaneous items observed and listed above are clarifications necessary tq echiave code compliance or an acceptable level, of opperation and are not related to the fireplace fire. We, alieve this list to be as complete as possible. if you have any yuus: ions or concerns, please feel frer o contact mo. Thank you. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEi;T Building and Safety Division /i —Jr James A. Mtrr" ttn�, Plan Check Coordinator JMidm CC: Stiles Construction Co. Mr. Roger Stiles 2001 3rd. St., Unit B Riverside, Ca. 92507 , s • i � b � a r�• s• a' i ;i ,c c f Yc r �1. M Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM i 1 +. DATEt January 16, 1991 TO: Mayor, Members of the City Council and ty danager FROMt Joe Schultz, cLP, community services Director •,.Y� SUBJECT: The subject above is an action Stem Wednesday evening. There is a staff report in your agenda ;+ticket. The Council directed staff on January 9, 1991 to compile s report on the Pros and cons of a county O*�en 8 ace District compared to a City Initiative. This report is attached and has bean reviewed by Council subccmmittes Wright and Buquet. In addition, the revised County of Dar. Eernard,no draft Resolution is attached and has been favorably revie.;ad by Council subcommittee Wright. and Buquot. Within your agenda pac.at delivered last Friday its* a legal opinion regarding your concern that if the majority of city residents vote eno" on the proposed San Bernardino County Parke and Open space District, can the City opt to not participate in the District. The conclusion of legal opinion is that the doaumont provides sufficient protections to the City wherein they would not be abic to be forced to maintain membership !.n a subsequently formed District. If you have further questions, please do not hee!tate to contact me. •J3 /kls Attachments on: Park and Recreation Commission Linda Dat.iels, Deputy City Manager Jerry Pulwood, Deputy City Manager Division Heads 1 r ..4`? ' 4 a, E DATE: TO: PROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM January 16, 1991 Joe Schultz, CLP, community Services Director Tarry L. Smith, Superintendent of Park Planning and Development Pros and Cons of City or County Supported Bond Issue This memo has been prepared to help compare the pros and cons of holding a bond election sponsored either by the County of San Bernardino or the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The information presented here is not intended to express a preference, but just to point out actual and perceived affects o! preparing and presenting a bond to tho electorate. Pros and Cons of the County Sponsored Open Space Assessment Din —Act based on on annual assessment of $36.00 /parcel, Comity share being Sb77,500 and City share $577,500, and how it effects Rancho Cucasongat PROS - • Need simple majority of vote to pass bond • county bears cost of the election • city will not be perceived as sponsoring a new tax, but allowing voters to decide whether or not they want to participate. • Creation of Doer Creak County Regional Par). • Potential for shared Nio and constructici: costs on co- sponsored facilities and projects. • Campaign suppirt and resources from a wider base - county wide. • No overhead coat for staff preparation and consultant fees. • Some restrictions on how dollars can be spent for the first 5 years. • Only 50i of generated revenue will go to local City project. • No guarantee that LAPCO will allow a City to withdraw, which has locally voted down the bond. ' d Pros & Cons Bond Issue January 13, 1991 Page 2 Pros and Cons Or a City sponsored )pan Space Bond Issue based on n 536.00 /parcel annual assessment, City sham being $1,155,070. PR09 + loot of funds generated will stay in the community. " No restriction on how money can be spent or divided between projects and N&0. + Aosseament amount can be fixed, based on local issues and economic climate in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. " A list of City projects can be e:evsloped and promoted which will be the direct and total recipient of assessment fees. + Exclusive local control over how the campaign in conducted and which direction it takes. QQHf _ * Probable loos of Deer Creek Regional Park facility. Political perception associated with sponsorship of a new tax. * Need 2/3 vnte to pass bond issue. * City would bear cost of election, possible $80,000, pass or fail. * overhead coat of staff time for preparation of bond issue. * Cityy would bear coot of consultants if required or dasired. HQ ME) - The above information, Is again presented for the sole Purpose to help evaluate both sides or the issue concerning iya S whether it Would he r ire beneficial for the city to pass its's own bond issuci or go with the proposed County of Ban Bernardino Open Space District. This decision would rest ultimately with the city Council oi' Rancho Cucamonga. 'f LS /dak 2 fm r.•no rw w.rrLVlrP ioi� . ���� -a. . a. {ire . '' /140tl'I1UDP' Oily ILLL6W, ""`A' REVISED PAGE 4 OF THE N.,O U (page 119 in 1/16 Ag-gEa pagkot) asseseaent. ' 10. The Participant shall have no financial obligation for the costa of election, fOraatlon, or any other expansa inourrsd prior to the Dlntrlat being approved by the voters. Yflrther, no obligation or other indebtedness shall be incurred by the District for any pr 60% within the ParticipantIG)bOundaries WA d the Participant a 11 have ne financial Obligation for any pons election exaan&se of the District until the substance of thin 1pU is approved and exaoutrd by the Participant and the District. ' 11. It is the intent of. the part ng ies to thin )KC that subatenoe aball be aubaitta4, to the cavern3 feaiy of District, ono* established, for appr*VQI in the fora, of a binding o iir�nt'betw*en:tbo District and t4a Lartiaipant. Odin eogniaa that the subatnnee of this NeU is trot osd q%ufleea and until such an agteeaent is apprcvsd and by the Participant and the Dietriot. BAR itRNARDINO COUNTY PMX%)NAL FARM MARTXM PARTICIPANT T'nt*r D actor °m o° e ' > n AN t 0 i �E „t SENT VjXa ox Te14co0iir 1020 1 1 -14 -81 i V 23PN : 9143072052- CIT'f MALUN 3 DRAFTD R R P T 1/14/!1 MMYA IOM R0. 91-. A IYDOLDTIOM Or mm ]BOARD or SUMMONS OF WX CCRBTr Or S11M A1UI11aR =O, STAT1 OF CaLTMMA, ORDaRM M PONUMOR OF TBB am BnRAUM Comm RBOIC3QL PARK RBD OPET "PACR DISTRICT RMD C✓1LLIS6 24 PCal1► OX J UCt it POR a1ID DISTRICT On Monday, February 4, 1991, on Notion of Supervisor _,, duly seconded by Supervisor and carried, the following resolution is adoptedl Section 1. The Board of Supervisors of the County of fan Bernardino hereby finds and determinsat (a) That there is a signitioent need for park- and open space facilities within the County of San Bernardino. (b) That rapid growth in tan Bernardino County ham created a significant desand for parka, trails, and natural open space and has critically iapacted wildlife habitat, soanio resouroes, and ■ensitiva historic and prehistoric sites. Consistent with the goals and objeotivas of the County of Ban Bernardino and the participating Cities and recreation and park districts, the Ban Bernardino County Regional Park and open Space District ( "District ") will hasp Neat local as wall as regional public recreation needs necessary for Maintaining the quality of life desired by the residents of the County and will help protect significant natural resource areas for the protection of the z c OY +Xerox To14eo0lor 7020 , 1 -14 -31 , 3:24PH 1 749072052+ CITY KALLi; 4" environment and the benefit oP County residents. (c) That section 6506.8 of the public Resovrcad coda autboriaec the formation of a Regional Park and open space District y in W" Bernardino County, to be formed by resolution of this Board and subject to oonfirsation by the voters within said District. 0 sgoticn 2. The Board of supervisors of the County of Ban Bernardino, therefore, hereby resolves and orders, (a) That the District stall bl called the Ban Bernardino County Regional Park end opea Space District. (b) That the District is to be formed for the following reasons, to V2 n, adoyt, Jay out, plant, develop and otherwise improve, extend, control, operate and maintain a ayatee of public Park*, playgrounds, trails, natural &rags, eoologic&l and cpsn space praserves, sports cospl&xes, scenic &rags and other facilities for public rsorcation far the use and enjoyment of all the inhabitants of the District. 'The District may select, designate and acquire Sand or rights in land, within or without the District, to be used and appropriated for such purposes. The District say conduct programs and classes in outdoor science education and conservation education and say do all other things necessary to carry out the purposes of the District. i .I �JJ�VSENT BYIX@rox Toleoopler 7020 1 1 ^14 -01 i 21240 i 7148872052+ CITY MMLLGN 5 (c) That this Board shall act, ex- officio, as the governing body of the District, With all powers and authority veated in this a Board. (d) That the territory to be included within the District is sat forth in the 14e1 description attaobad hereto as txhibit MAN CA incorporated herein by this rsfarance. (a) That the District shall be financed by grants, user room, donations, general funds, ocncession revenue, and a bansfit assessment. The District ray exempt certain typos of parcels from _ the benefit asssusant an follows, I. Uninhabited Paroels substantially used in agricAllturs. Z. Percale enforoecbly restricted as open space land during the ties in Which the parcel le eo used or restricted. (f) That in addition to local park and recreation projects undartakan by cities and recreation and park districts which participate in the Dimtriot, revenues generated by the District &hall be used to aoecs;plish the following projeots mat forth in Bxhibit "am# attached harsto and incorporated herein by this reference. ..!c 4 .. ut:xlrox 1016cppioi 702u : 1 -14 -31 : 3;2 : 7143872052^ CITY rXUN 5 (9) That it shall be the policy of this Board not to oppose detachment proceedings through the local Agency Formation Commission by a city or recreation and Park district which received lets than a majority vote in favor of the District withi-% its boundaries, t, ovided, hovevrr, that detachment proceedings are initiated Within thirty (30) days follwing certification of the election results. (h) That the formation of the District shall be subject to confirmation by a majority of the voters at an election which shall be held June 1 1991 within the territory of the District. The bnlloo measure submitted at the election shall be as followaf Park and open aP oo D trio*, (B"Distriotu) be created and established to Preserve, protect and maintain natural open space and wildlita habitats and develop, .iOrrovo, and maintain regional end local parka, trails and public recreation faeilitiae subject to the terms and conditions of Resolution No. 91- adopted by the Board of Supervisors of Ban Bsrn44no County on February <, 19917 (b) shall the District have the authority to assass an annual tea of $3e per parcel for the pu�.''poae of carrying out its enumerated responsibilitias with each parcel holder being allotted rsduced toss for the use of District Regional Faoilitl.oa up to tte amovnt of the assessment allocated to' District regional facilities? and (o) a the District establish an annual appropr ation.s limit of $30,000,0007 PASSED AhJ ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors of sari Bernardino County, state of California, by the folloving vote, AYlSr supa;visormr NQYBr 9upa= viaorsr AMENTs Supervisors a '`eVY r BY: %vox TU 000Gl4r 7020 i 1 -1t -i1 i 8:25PX S 7143872052+ CITY f BTATB OF CALI1OR77IA CCDN71 OF B)Lw B2RANA7IDIR0 It ZAXLM #."MAT, Clark of the Board of Supervisore of Nn a tulle trot ti correct copy of the certify o the the action as to sags appears in the Official Xinutas of said Boa" at its Bsatinq of sabruary •, 1991. =Mrt SPROAT Clark of'the Board of Supervisors of Can Bornardino county BY — Deputy ;JAL I, t'.°,h�i��.._i ..�v•- f9, +.ant ;� ' {� 'm "bch: erxerox tU ppppt9r 7020: 1 -14 -31 ; 4:35PA 7143872052» CITY HALL :s 2 tt t 21®1T "A" Those portions of the County of San L California, described as fellowai ernnrdino, .taro of PARCEL N0. 1 y Beginning at the southwest corner of section 19, To,nlahip 5 North, Range 7 West, can Bernardino Meridian, said point being the intersection of the Szira Bernardino and Los Angeles County line With the Center line of Palndals Road; Thence Easterly along Bald center line of Palmdale Road to the East line of Section 23, Township 5 North, Range 6 West, Ban Bernardino Meridian, Thence south along section lines to the NorthwLst corner of Msefich 11, Township 3 North, Range 6 Wast, San Bernardino 1 Thence East along the North line of Sections 11 and 12 to the Northeast correr of Bald section 72; Thence South along the 3ango line between Ranges 5 and 6 Went to the Northwest corner of section 19, Township 3 North, Range 5 West, San Bernardino MariCiant Thence East along the North line of said Section 19 to the Northeast corner thereof; Thence South along section linen to the Northwest corner of Section 5, Township 2 North, Range 5 west, San Bernardino Maridiant Thence zest along the North Northeast corner thereof! 'in* of anlG Section S to the Thence South, along the East line of seotionn 5 and a to the Northwest corner of Section i6; Thence zest along section lines to the Southwout corner of Section 7, ToWnahip 2 North, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian; Thence North along the West line of Sections 7 and 6 to the Northwest corner of said section 6t Thence East along the Township line between Townships 2 end RJ a ng Noe rth 1 We to the SouthWgst corner of Section 33, Township 3 North, st, sen Bernardino Meridian; Thence No along the Want line of sections JJ, 28 and 21 to the Northwest corner of said Section 21; Thence East along ■action linaj to the Northeast corner of Section 21, Township 3 North, Range 2 zest, San 8arnatdinu Meridian; Thence South along section lines to the Township line between Townships 2 and 3 North; Thence East along Bald Township line to the Range line between Ranges 2 and J East, Thancs South along said Range line to the Township line bstvcan Townships i and 2 North; Thence East .long amid Township line to the Range line between Ranges 4 and 5 East; Thence North along said Range line to the Township line between Townships J and 4 North; .n SENT BY:Xerox Telecopior U40 ! -91 : 4:35p4 1 7143872052" CITY wLLL:s 3 4 Thence East along said 2•ownship ling to the Range line between Ranges 5 and 6 East; Thence North along said Range line to the Township line between Townships 4 and 3 North; Thence East along maid Township line to the Range line between Ranges .9 and 10 Last; •• Thence South along said Range line to the Township line between Townships 3 and 4 North; Thence East alnng said Township line to the West line of Section 6, Township 3 North, Range 11 East, San Bernardino Meridian; Thence North alatq said West Sine to the Northwast corner of said section 6; Thence East along the Township line betwesi Townships 3 and 4 North to the Range line between Rtngas 11 and ..2 East; Thence South along said Range line to the Township line between Townships 1 and 2 North; Thence East along oeid Township line to the Range llhe between Ranges 22 and 13 East; Thence South along amid Range line to the Southeast corner of Section 36, Township 1 South, Range 12 East, San Bernardino Meridian, said corner being on the San Bernardino County line. Thence West along said county line and continuing along maid County line, following all of its various courses to the POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL NO. 2 Beginning at the Southwest corner of Section North, Range 3 Nest, San Bernardino Meridian. Tbanca North along section lines to the Section 33, Township 0 North, Range 3 West, 14aridian; 33, Township 7 South lira of San Bernardino Thence West along said South line to the Southwest corner of said $motion 33; Thence North along section lines to the West quarter corner Of Section 4, Township 9 North, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian; Thence, East along quarter section Sines to the Zest 1111a of the West I•alr or the Southwest quarter of section 2, sane Township and Ranga; Thence South along amid Zest line to the North 'line of the South half of the South half of raid Set:tion 2; Thence Zset along said North line to the Went line of Section 1; Thence North along said West line to the Nast quarter corner of said section 17 Thence East along quarter section lines to the West quarter corner of Section 2, Township 9 North, Range 2 West, San nernarding Meridian; Thence North along section lines to the Northwest corner of Section 20, Township 11 North, Range 2 West, Ban Bernardino Meridian; Thence .cast along section lines to the San Bernardino Meridian line; r , ry, F� 6 i'i- 14 =Bi 4:21PN ,... 714307.'052+ CITY BALL10 4 Thence South along said Meridian line to the Northweat corner of ©action 6, Township 10 North, Rango 1 East, San, Bernardino Mazidianl Thence East along the Township line between Townshipa 10 and 11 North to the Rance line bstwsen Ranges 1 and 2 East; Thence South along said Rnn?- lina to the Northwast corner at Scotian 70, Township 9 North, Rmga 2 East, San asrnardino Meridian: Thence Zest along section lines to the Rarvde line between Ranges 2 and % Sastt Thence south along said Range line to the Township line between Townships 6 &-A 7 North; Theme want along Paid Township line to the East line of Section 76, Township '7 North, Range 1 Neat, San earnardina Meridism Thence South along said Zest line to the Southdlat corner of said Section 761 Thence west along the Township Sine betwasn Townships 6 and 7 North to the POINT OF BEGINNING. WIRY N. COTTON COUNTY SURVEYOR COUNTY OF SAN DERNARDINO Dy ` . Deputy Z.D. eras 1 IS loot rk1 rlxuravan 4 ewoi tlf LI a r;JVNTY SURVPYOR'U OPPICE January 7, 1991 ,a „ I, rip , .1Ylir•,, yjM .?r�tl • { ' � ,i,beNT BY:XVax Ttiaoplor 7020 1 1 -14 -31 7 3:26PM 1 7143372052- MZXUT WNW CITY MALOW The following regional and joint projacc:s shall be accomplished through the District share of revenues generated by the District. Revenues collected from a participating community will be expended by the District only for projects that banefit that community. After Completion of the projects listed below, new District project lists wit: be developed in cooperation with communities frog each zone participating in the District. Saat YAU" 1. Santa Ana River Trail Corstructica t. Grafton /tills open Space Acquisition 3. San Timoteo /Live oak Ca11YO1kMilSOn Creak Trail Construction 4. wildlife Corridor Study T"Ismantation S. Yucaipa Regional Park Improvements DA=ral V/11eV 1. Olen Helen Regional Dark Improvements 2. Aqua manse Regional park D. .lopment 3. Santa Ana River Trail Construction 4. Santa Ana River Trail Connectors (Lytle and Cajon Creaks) S. Phalan park Development wu�tii�V 1. Doer Creek Ragional Park Development 2. Cucamonga auaati Regional Park Isprova+ents r � �n { j`lfT.VV+ . a�ee 1 1 I Tolecopilir 7020`1c1 ^14 -31 13120PM V- 7140072052» %to District will expend 80% of its share of revenue collected fro% percale within Rancho Cucamonga and its aphare of influence on Deer Creek Regional Park and 701 on Cucamonga - Cuasti Regional Park through kniidcut of those Parks' respective maatar plan;. After completion of those projeots, new District project lists will be developed in cooperation with the communities participating in the District. 7. Chino Hills Pcrkland Acquisition 6. prado Basin open Space Acquisition S. Prado Regional park lsprovaents D7atri2t 2n9aa ■ 1. Lake arsgory Regional park. 3:mprovemsnta. 2. Vellay of Bnchantment and Acquisition. 3. Holcomb Valley Area Habitat Acquisition. joint prolects 1. Baldwin Lake Park 2. Rim of the VOrld aym/Pool Complex and Land acquisition 7. Valley o: Bcahantment Nature lark s. sear Valley Habital Conservation Plan 6. Hoonridge Zoo Relocation 6. Bear valley Regional Serving Parka - Restroom Development and xaintenance (Metcalf, Civic Center, Bartlett, Rnickerbdck*r) I D Tk-& In-P 3 OmOlik... 1;,+y y P./- l:R., 143 E S OXS -1`0 n aley Cl r__ January 9, 1990 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a ar MEMORANDUM wa CONFIO NTIAL TO: Mayor. Councilmemberr and City Manager FROM: Jerry Grant. Building Official SUBJECT: PUBLIC COMMENTS FP M - MR. a M S. FLORES - MR. S MRS. LARRY WILDER. AND JOHN HUGGINS At the City Council Meeting of Jan. 2, several issues were raised that warrant a brief explanation or clarification. A more complete and detailed assessment will be presented at the Jan 16th meeting regarding the Flores issue. 1. Flores FlrePlace Fire Preliminary investigation into the circumstances leading N the fire at the Flores household indicates that, the required air space and /or brick separation required from the firebo:a area (where the wood 1s placed) to combustible materials was not provf1ed for on the Flores fireplace. In simple terms the front portion of the firebox was built directly on top of the wood subfl oor Additionally, the hearth extension (the noncombustible area in front of and extending past either side of the fireplace opening) was likewise constructed directly upon the wood floor. When a fire was built and the ignition temperature of the under -floor wood was reached, the fire occurred. A multitude of factors including changes in one home from prefabricated fireplaces to masonry fireplaces, sequencing of inspections, changes in inspection assignments, have led to the oversight explained above. Investigation of several other neighboring homes with similar floor construction indicates that the conditions probably exist in a total of seven homes. These seven constitute all of the homes within the subdivision that were constructed with raised wood floors. The balance of the subdivision has concrete slab floors and they `ore do not have the potential for the type of mishap as occurred in the Flores' house. This deficiency, to my knowledge, is the first of its kind in Rancho Cucamonga. As a result, we have me'_ifla normal inspection prccedures and to inspect at four o«er stages of fireplace work because of prior experiences Memo: Public Comments January 9, 1991 Page 2 and discoveries. We will be addressing this important matter to greater ants ll at the City Council meeting of January 16th. We have made contact with the developer and masonry contractor their I' city offices. Y airs. with them at the site and process of arranging for rep respontf nil itf es and are in the P repairs and provide his input. The Flores am meld no arrangements for their own independent contractor /inspectors LOheecost the necessary We have agreed ec pay y o if determined to be reaso:iable after review In addition we have also made arrangements for Robert tin dings. lnThatsu should His house and Inspection 15 the Flores' , the aftesno n of Januarys l0��tngs. That be available for the January 16 meeting. 11 Huggins, Wilder T regarding In regard to issues raised by John Huggins and Mr. and Mrs Wilder, one of the Nordic homes, i submit the following: The home referred to by the three speak-­S Nordtcasubdivision- lt is Hermosa; one of owned by the most northerly homes 1n the Needs II" Improvements). The Mr and Mrs Ted Moser and was the latesthoneof offsite eiImprov ments). Th 4 homes are still being held pending p appearances at council meetings Council may recall Mr. Moser from a couple of with the Nordic homeowners, requesting release of the stated for his agcy home. At those meetings he was one of the owners who stated is o contacted of the problems with oNordic but ddid not wbeen ezDerienc7rgd in his occupancy because of D peak of the Nordic issues threatening lawsuit me at one point during the unless we released his home. I received d telephone shortly after his occupancy In relation to the wiri ng the middle of refrigeration smog electrical and air call from Mr. Moser about thhem'ndicatedAthatihe was having wa: approved. At the time, conditioning problems and that he had made contact wit} the a electrical that contractor, but had not been able to obtain response from riathayelectrtcal contractor, a connection wehecuntectedbthean From his description of the conditions, a loose connertion(s) or iced to corrected. We thereupo that it needed to be traced out and 0 out and check into the electrical contractor of record who 1ica g t atioa was rot corrected, to let problem I then called Mr. as indicating that we hadhnwever -r check with reaction from the electricaa ^. and, I me know. I heard nothing further from him at the t me, have since contacted Hoser who confirmed mY recollection of this activity• the elects lea` contractor indicated that the problem had been resolve . C Memo: Public Comments January 9, 1991 Page 1 Additional statements from him provided information that : a) wiring at one outlet had been cut immediately above the outlet box which required a small hole; b) other small holes were made to install some telephone outlets and to replace the refrigeration lines; c) during lnstaliatlon of an alarm system by Mr Wilder's company, he had mentioned the "sabotage" to the systems (in reference to the cut wire and damaged refrigeration tubing); d) Mrs. Wilder has never been in his house since he has moved in; e) he wished other Nordic homeo:mers would quit involving him in their problems; f) only two circuits of the airing were involved. ,y He also Informed me that shortly after my assistance in the wiring problem, *(, that he began to gradually receive Increased cooperation from Narr1 reto, to the point where, now, most of his customer service problems are resolved. In regard to "every drain in the house being clogged ', the full -time inspector C at final inspection time made a specific paint ' requiring that all drain lines be augered out before releasing the utilitles, because the house had been standing an excessive length of t' d some of the fixtures had been used by workman at the site. This is a usual practice bit was Insisted upo^ because of the circumstances. In regard to the possibility of the gas tlae being damaged, in addition to our test, the Gas Company performs a gas pressvre test of the piping immediately before installing the meter. This double check should be assurance that the gas piping is safe. The damage to the refrigeration lines and wiring described by the critics at the council meeting end by Mr. Moser indicates clearly that it was caused by vandals or out of vindictiveness. Since it was located within the walls, the only time it could have occurred would have been sometime between sough wiring /rough mechanical inspections and drywall installation. The former ocarred on September 15, 1989, the latter prior to November 1, 1989 when drywall inspection was approved. This offered a period of approximately 6 weeks for the act to have occurred, during which the Building and Safety staff would have had no reason to be at the site. The Moser house was one of those provided with full -time Inspection under the "bad builder" ordinance, however, that procedure was not invoked until about the first of March 1990, well after drywall was installed and, therefore not during our full -time inspection as voiced by Mrs. Wilder. Reference to the "obvious code violation" by Mrs. Wilder, is In regard to the ester pressure regulator and its location In respect to a hose blbb and /or sprinkler connection. This arrangement is not a code violation and I have repeatedly advised Mr. Wilder of that in the past, including at the meeting that he referenced in his comments. The pressure regulator is required to 3 iM.Z� .�+.. • ., yY y�yi 4 Memo: Public Cowen'sl January 9, 1991 - Page a %r. S protect the piping sy_tem within the house and the installation of a hose bib? „ and /or lawn sprinkler ronnecion, outside the structure but ahead of the regulator, is completely acceptable are is usually done purposely, so as to f� provide optimum pressure for exterior use. A check with the Wat:r District 'ncicates the daytime water pressure averages 150 PS •, which may sting the skin 4f applied from a garden hose but really doesn't represent any hazard. In regard to the failure of staff to notify owners of Walt White framed houses, this apparently occurred in conversation with Rick Gomez about the time that tho Huggins, Wilders and Olivers filed a claim against the.City. ` Staff was advised shortly thereafter that time by the City Attorney that all conversation end correspondence should be terminated pinding resolution of the claim. For that reason,no action was taken by staff. As added information, '•' other than by casual ob'servatfon during the construction, staff has no way of determining what subcontractor would be performing a particular tra.fe on a project, except for those subcontractors that obtain permits for the electrical plumbing and mechanical work. Since the building permits for all Nordic projects were issued to Nordic Development, we would have no knowledge of who the framing contractor was, except by happenstance. The following is in regard to alleged failure of staff to perform inspections in Nordic homes by using the consulting engineer rather than City staff. This was apparently in reference to inspection of the attic area of a home owned by a Mr, and Mrs. Duane Glass. Rick Gomez spoke to Mr Glass at a council meeting and arranged with Mr. Glass for a preliminary In ;pection to be performed by myself. I personally contacted Mr. Glass, and make an appointment, indicating that I would be bringing Jim Martin with me since he had previously Inspected the roof area of their house and found It without problem. Mr Glass stated that he had no objection to that arrangement and specifically said that 'i' I were to say that the framing was acceptable that he would be satisfied ", that. Indeed, his roof was okay, Jim Martin and I subsequently visited the site, weave met there by Mr. Wilder anJ Mr. Huggins, Mr, GI asz not being home. John Huggins and I both entered the attic area and after reviewing the construction mutually agreed that there were no structural concerns. Upon returning to the office I contacted Mr. Glass and reported on my conclusions to him. He appeared contented with the report and I have heard nothing further from him. The attached memo references that contact. In reference to Mr. Wilder's comments of our meeting , it is true that we did meet He and his partner in business, (Joe Guidera another Hordit owner) requested a meeting with me about 6 weeks ago, after a rteting with the City Manager. However, the tone of our conversation was considerably different from the way it was relayed at the City Counitl meeting, My recollection of his "pleading" was to the effect 'Couldn't something be done to help Mr Moser ? ", since his wiring had been cut and his refrigen.tion lines damaged. ;( r .t" Y= �r M: � �`, +•.t T,' .. yh �St� Q ''. aGttiT.: w, }�^ °�yi Zd�•' "} Yrv%�«a•, ` ... ♦- ♦ r yyya•u: Ys 3Y iii C t2if�ij Z���iiyy�r °;y�.irC`•'.`A "vi i Memo: Public Comoentst" • •�•9 January 9, 1991 Page 5 •• I also recall something to 'the effect, that, since the mayor 1s a depvty�- \` district attorney, that there must be some way to make builders live'up'to their responsibilities. Because the Issue had beep previously extensively reviewed with the city attorney and the Nordic city council subcoomittee, I Advised him that we had no way of forcing that issue. For that reason and believing the matter concluded. I xaw no reason to involve the Nayor, Hr. Wilder also raised the Issue of the pressure regulator which I. explained es outlined previously. I trust this memo will provide the City Council with data relative to the "hordicr issues. We will amplify on the Flores issue at the January,16 meeting. JG:ll ' .r•; +h iw f• B ci C MF GA RANCHO MOR_A<NDUM October 2.1990 <a -- 'v RECCiv OCT 8 0 0 Mayor, Member; of the C1tY council and C1 Fps' omaion TI ent Df rectoe G FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Developm BY: Jerry Grant. Building Official SUBJECT: NONOIC NOOOS I INSPECTIONS owner; in Nord1iWoods orriginal On September 25, at the request of two property tested the reviews were Martin and Jerr y Gran t conducted a rev`wners whoa request areas Nordic subdivision. The two property Rance. in No Jac Y all who 1s proposing to sell to a Mr. ncl ded to and Duane Gass. whose atilt had DrevtouslY been inspected and c ° ^cTatrdvisit and requested The th lyd Omar• a Mr. Holcomb arrived The werdtd. that the City also inspect his attic. John At the site. John Huggins and Larry Nildrr wcre atsoand �imMartin: Through went up inns the attics with Jerry ins and N11der had Huggins artually urq,,. him to request an inspection D the course of the inspections arentlyacknOwlhimt that u99 contacted Mr. Williams Ha11'sp residence. and Jim to him purchasing After relnsPecting Duane Glass' house and the other two houses err examples ofr PO rrw °rkmanshiP in the Hall /Niany ams Martin found no indications of any them There were several examples0 but not to the extent that would aftcarse house that are structurally deficiencies so that harm, John Huggins also concurred with the above conclusions Y provide him with a listing of any Mr. Williams' Mr Hall asked that we F them. he might have them corr9 °4hata Information L0 f his sale 0 the C°unct; up Jerry Grant is D I w111 keep Should any additional information become available, to date. RG:JG:11 0 , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �- STAFF REPORT DATE: January 16, 1991 TO: City Council and City Manager f FROM: Pavl Rougeau, Acting Deputy City Engineer BY: Mike Olivier Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Permisslon to open escrow with Gwo -Chao Liao al al , for Right -of -way acquisition at Foothill ar Rochester f_- APN 227 -021- 31,32, for $120,000.0( plus escrow coat o: $3,000.00 to be paid frc Systems Fees Account No. 22 -4637 -8942- 4607 -4117 ar authorize the City Manager to execute all necessar documents RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval and direct staff to open esc -ow with Gwo Chao Liao at al , for purchase of land at 8171 Rocheste Avenue and 11941 Foothill Boulevard, `o abtain the deflclen street right -of -way for the Traffic, Signal and Stree Improvements on Rochester Avenue at Foothill Boulevard fo $120,000.00 plus escrow costs of 93,000.00 to be paid fro. Systems Fees Account No. 22 -4637- 8942 -460. -4117 and authoriz the City Manager to execute escrow documents on behalf of th City BACKGROUND /ANALYSIS The Engineering Design staff met with the re;resentctive o: Gwo -Chau Liao et. al., to discuss the forthcoming City projec! to Snstnll a traffic signal and street improvements a+ Rochester Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. It was mutually agreed that the City would purchase the portion of their property T. eded for this project. The purchase price Is based on an appraisal prepared by an Independent appraisal consultant. The mutually acceptable result is the above recommendation plus the City absorbing normal escrow closing costa. Respectfully submitted, 12,11141l1e PR: MO: mp