The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1980/02/25 - Agenda PacketIo iki 'k k k NA .`71e'iC4 CITY OF RANCHO CO MIONOA PLANNING COMISSION AGENDA Mondnyp February 25, 19500 7:00 p.m. Lions Park Community Center' 9161 Dasalina, Hanc ho Cucamonga, California ACTION I. Plauge of Allegiance All Present II. Roll Call - Dahl, .tonan, Garcia, Tolatoy, itempol III. Approval of Minutes No Minutes Februnry 13, 1980 Asked P.C. to reserve IV. Announcements Mondays in ,Tuna for General Plan V. Consent Calendar A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARCEL MAP Nn. SAg2 - Approved 5 -0 PRESCHER - Dividing existing 400000 square foot parcel into two 20,000 square foot parcels located at the southwest corner of Hallman and Hillside. Asuasaor's Parcel No. 1061 - 621 -05. D. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARCEL MAP N0. 5891 - SILVA - Subdividing the existing property into Approved 5 -0 four (4) parcels located between Summit Avenue and Shasta Avenua, adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue. C. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 5441 - Approved 5 -0 SCHULTZ - Dividing existing property into four (4) parcels located at the southeast ce)-nor of Last Avenue and Summit. Assessor's Parcel No. 225- 191 -08. D. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 5626 - Continua to 3/12180 DATA DESIGN - Develop alto into 20 industrial lots 5 -0 located west of Haven Avenua, approximately 660' north of Foothill Dlvd. in the City of Rancho Cuca- monga, California. Assessor's Parcel No. 1077 - 401 -05. E. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 5760 - Approved 5 -0 O'DONNELL -.Subdivision for industrial park located on the northeast corner of 6th Strcet and Milliken. Assessor's Parcel No. 229 -26 -29 and 30. F. RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL for General Plan Amendments Approved 5 -0 No. 80 -01A, 80 -01E and 80 -01C. I i'1ntw Comunirmiou Agenda Pabrunry 25, 1980 Pnga 2 VI. Public Hearings Denied without G• NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -02 - Prejudice - g -p WATT 1NDUSTl1IE8 - ChmAgs f mm it -3 to C -Y for property located on thu cant side of Haven Avenue between Lemon and Highland. 11. iEOATIVE DLF,ARATION AND ME APPROVAI, N0._ 80 -01 - Approvad 5 -0 with NONE AND ASSOCIATES additional conditions - - - -• -- -Proposed shopping center to be located on Clle llavan. southwest corner of Lemon and Continued to I. NWATIVC DECLARATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE MHtl NLNT 3/12/80 NO. 80 -01 - CONDO COYVI!RDIOr �avolopmo�:t— n 5/0 with publir, hearing a condominium convorsion ordinance. open VII. Old Duoineso VIII. Now Business Continued J. RIQUEST BY HENRY REITER for the title of fleas for an 5 -0 industrial leasing office located on the southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald. Two signs allowed with K. K1 ULST BY C1UIP1?EY COLLDGL for use of tin off si.l!e City sign program at 9th directional sign for the Chaff ay College Skill; 6 Archibald and 9th 6 Center. Helms IX. Council Referral X. Director's Reports Continued to 3/12/80 L. REPORT reRattiinp liillaida Development tandards XI. Public Comment - Anyone wishing to comment on any items not listed on the Agenda may do so at this tima. XII- Upcoming Agenda 1. Zone Change No. 80 -01 - Isaacs 2. Director Review No. 80 -05 - Isaacs 3. Grading Ordinance 4. Time Extension Request for Ketner Apartment XIV. Adjournment - The Planning Commission has adopted Adminis- trative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, it shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. `'T z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PIANNING COMISSION �Y.�•.? ( sNDAU 1� - i Fnbrudy�i 25 19U0, 7t 00 p.m. N" Lionn Park Community Center 9161 Baseline, Honcho Cucamonga, California i) ,r I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll call III. Approval of Minutes February, 14, .980 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR MKUN MAr nu. 7oyL - PRESCHEit - Dividing existing 40,000 square foot parcel into two 20,000 square foot parcels located• at the southwest cornsr of Hellman and Hillside. Assessor's Parcel No. 1061 - 621 -05. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARCEL MAP 140. 5891 - SILVA - Subdividing the existing property into \� -faur;Q.) parcels located Summit Avenue altpatn -�nuL adjacent nt• to to �i Etiwnnda Avenue. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARCEL. MAP NO. 5441 - SCHULTZ - Dividing existing property into four (4) parcels located at the southeast corner of East Avenue and Summit. Assessor's Parcel No. 225- 191 -08. 1 D. NEGATIVE. DECLARATION FOR 1 ?ARCEL MAP NO. 5626 DATA DESIGN - Develop sits into 20 industrial lots located west of Haven Avenue, approximately 660' north of Foothill Blvd. in the City of Rancho Cuca- mon8a, California. Assessor's Parcel No. 1077 - 401 -05. E. NEGATIV E DECLARATION FOR PAKGL L Mar nv. -� I uv - O'DONNELL - Subdivision for industrial,park.located ,on the northeast corner of 6th Street and Milliken. �Ascessor's Parcel No. 229- 26 - -29 and 30. RF.SOL.OTION OF APPROVAL for General Plan Amendments No. 80 -)Uf 80 -01B and 80 -0 C. Planning Co:muiaaiun Agandn February 25p 1980 Page 2 VI.. Public Hearings 9 .I % wrcrr INUUUTIU n - Unang(l Crum K -.1 CO property locatod on the onat aide of between Lemon and Highland. 1laven, IGLARATiUN AN) 131•1'K "FHUVAli NV. eu -vl. SOCIATLS - Propooed shopping cantor to on the southwost corner of Lomun and r J NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ZONING OIiDIN V NO. 00-01 - CONDO CONVERSION . Tha d w n condominium conversion ordinanc Vil.. Old Duoinos VIII. Now Dusinoar L:.% REOU BY leasing g office for the use o t4l, industrial leasing ofYico located on corner of Arrow and Archibald. I N C REQUEST BY CITAPFL'Y COLLEGE for unn of n otf -site directional sign for the Chaffey Calleg kills C. Center. IX. Council Referral Director's Reports L. REPORT regardinFi 11illai a Development Stangard. s M. 15 d-.-, W,or. Public Comment - Anyone win ing to comment on any items not listed on the Agendn may do so at this time. Upcoming Agenda 1. Zone Change No. 80 -01 - Isaacs 2. Director Review No, 80 -05 - Isaacs 3. Grading Ordinance 4. Time Extension Request for Ketner Apartment XIV. Adjournment - The Planning Commission has adopted Adminis- trative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond th time, it shall be heard only with the consent of the CoYansion. i r i f r• • ga 4 ., �. "�• ii1 9 I I CL C r 1 v� v t — • ,ala y r , 1 Pow AI107i q " VONNMAa I[o�iy �ypl G N }6 t F { a W, I� alw�n. ai�na , 1 iS ��,i, }1f� I•�•'f r• • ga 4 ., �. "�• ii1 9 I I CL C r 1 v� v t — • ,ala y r , 1 Pow AI107i q " VONNMAa I[o�iy �ypl G N }6 t F { a W, I� alw�n. ai�na , 1 0 Y. I a\ i! ii CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING February 25. 1980 Regular Meeting CALL TO ORDER 0 The regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamongo wnn held in the Lions Park Community Contor, 9161 Banc Lino, Rancho Cucamonga, on Monday, February 25, 1980. Meeting was called to order at 7 :05 p.m. by Chairman Rompol who led the meeting with thu Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Jorge Garcia, Laura Jones, Peter Tolstoy, and Merman Rempel ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Nona ALSO PRESENT: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Ted llopson, City Attorney; Barry Hogan, Senior Planner; Michael Vairin, Associate Planner; Tim Beadle, Associate Planner; Paul Rougeau, Associate Civil Engineer; and Nancy McAllister, Secretary iw A A fi i, ANNOUNCEMENTS Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reported there will be a series of public hearings in June of this year in regard to the General Plan. lie asked that the Commission reserve every Monday during the month of June for those public, hearings. This would then allow the Council time to conduct their public hearings, during the month of July so that the August deadline can be met. CONSENC CALENDAR Upon motion carried, the 6 by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Garcia and unanimously following consent calendar items were approved as submitted: Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 5892 - Preacher Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 5441 - Schultz Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 57110 - O'Donnell A A * * * E Commisnioner Dahl otatud in regard to Item 1111 ", Parcel Map No. 58910 an a condition of the Parcel Map will the'appli.cont be required to improve Shnntn,, Summit and Etiwanda Streets? Paul Hougenu, Associate Civil Engineer, stated the nouthurly street (Shaetn), lips been improved. Improvements on Etiwanda and Summit will ba required at the time of development. There being no further comments regarding this item, n motion was made by Commia- sioner Will neconded by Commissioner Tolotoy and unanimously carried to approve Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No. 5691 no submitted. * A * * * Commissioner Tolotoy stated in regard to Consent Calendar Item "D ", Negative Declaration for Parcel lisp No. 5626 (Data Design), lie naked if all the Iota meet the requirements of the Ordinance an some of the lots seem awfully narrow and long. Mr. Lam stated all lots created are basically now lots. The City Engineer is empowered to approve the Parcel Map unless requested for review by the Planning Commission. In review of the tentative map, Staff has found that some of the lots do not meet ordinance requirements which means any approval of this parcel map must have technical modifications made to it so that the requirements are met. Furthermore, staff wan not aware that the lots shown along haven, west of the channel would be divided with this parcel wimp. That area is not shown no indus- trial but as administrative professional on the General Plan. Normally in the A -P area, all property is developed at one time which means a coordination of accesses, etc. is required. Therefore, Staff would not be recommending approval of those three lots at this time. lie suggested if the Commission is interested in thin particular application and has interest in a number of elements of that plan that this item coma, to the Commission in its entirety for review. Commissioner Tolatoy stated he oleo has a number of other questions in regard to this parcel map and felt the mop should come before the Commission for review. E A motion was made by Commissioner Tolotoy, seconded by Commissioner Garcia and unanimously carried to continue review of the Negative Declaration -for Parcel Map No. 5626 to the March 12, 1980 Planning Commission meeting. It wan further requested that the Parcel Map application be submitted to the Commission for review at that meeting. After general discussion, a motion was made by Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Dahl and unanimously carried to approve Consent Calendar Item "F", Resolution of Approval for General Plan Amendments No. 80 -OlA, 80 -01D and 80 -01C. * * * * * Planning Commission Minutes -2- February 259 1980 ® PUBLIC 11P.ARING NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND 70NE CNANGit N0. 80 -02 - WATT INDUSTItILS C11111180 from R -3 to C -1 for property located on the cast side of Iinven Avenue between Lemon and Highland. Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ndopt Resolution No. 80 -05 which recomnando approval of 'long Chnngo No. 80 -02 and issuance of a Negative Declaration to the City Council. Staff further recommends that if the zone change in approved thnt the following conditions bu added to Resolution No. 00 -05: 1) That the soning revert back to the original zone after a one year period if the applicant in not suce.engful in obtaining building permits for the project. 2) Tile zone change would cover the urea starting at the north of Lemon Avenue south to within 250 feet north of the centerline of 11ighland Avenue. The Caltrano right - of -way in not to be changed to C -1. If at a latue time the freeway does not go in then there would be an opportunity to come in and re -zone that area. Commissioner Jones asked if we are currently reaching saturation point on commer- cial centers. Mr. Vair.in stated at this point we are merely considering, a zone change for the property and its appropriateness for the potential of a shopping center. Conmissioner Garcia asked if the applicants have considered the entire 80 acres in their planning. Mr. Lan stated at the present time thet applicant is pursuing the center portion ' of the property. Their intention is to have a planned development with combina- tion A -P type use and perhaps condominium type uses. both uses are allowable µ; under the mixed use designation of the: General Plan. Chairman Rempel opened the public heartng. Mr. Scott Dell, representing Watt Commercial Properties, stated they have reviewed r.he staff report and are in concurrence with that report. They are pursuing the Zone Change in order for the zoning to be in conformance with the General Plnn. Clara Velez, 10522 Lemon Avenue, stated there are 34 homes within her tract and they all share one thing in common - their desire to preserve the residential neighbor - lined. They chose to live in a small community below the foothills for their children to play. They deliberately did not want to move into an area next to commercial development. it is felt more emphasis should be placed on the needs and desires of the residents in the area. A shopping center would be very nega- tive for the area. There are currently many vacant shops within this City in existing shopping centers. In a quick survey of eight centers, 37 shops were vacant. She submitted a list of residents willing to work toward keeping; their community residential. JoAnn Burns, 10570 Lemon, submitted a petition signed by residents of the area ® in opposition to the zone change. Their main concerns are: the safety of their children, ecological impact, the community impact, the deterioration of property surrounding shopping centers, the proximity to gales of liquor and the misuse of liquor sales by Chaffey students and the proximity of liquor sales to school bus stops. Planning Commission Minutes -3- February 25, 1980 0 ® a Mr. Fred Sherman, 6225 Dakota, stated an environmental non000ment. was included in the staff report which line aosonnod no impact to the reaidential area our - rounding this zone change. However. there is nothing to back up those conclusions. Ile finds it hard to believe there would be no impact due to the increase of traffic In the area. There will also be trucks to stock the stores and a lot of thin will be done at night. Development of a center would enuoo a lot more noise and traffic problems in the area. There could also be a significant increase in the crime rate. We already have an overburdened police depnrtment without enough personnel to pro- tect the entire area. Commercial development in thin area will cause a drop in real estate values. The entire appearance of the area is going to chnnge from residential to commercial. lie naked that the Commission consider rejection of the zone change. If a rejection in not given he naked that at least a 30 day postponement be given no that they may be given a little more time to assess the impact this in going to have on the area. Mr. Roland Smith, 6235 Valinda, stated the reason he moved to thin area was to get away from commercial development surrounding the residential. lie would like thin area to remain residential. lie moved cut here for peace and quiet and dung not wont another Montclair Plaza. There in a large area in the City which could be zoned commercial. Mr. Steve Ilaimann, 10423 Cartilla, stated le moved from Lou Angeles to come to this city. They moved to this area because of the value of property and the serene, pleasant atmosphere of the area. The effect of a shopping center in thin area is going to ba very damaging. Ile is concerned of the increased crime rate. The impact of commercial would have a detrimental effect on the children in the area. Looking at this project Ito does not see how the City will benefit. Mr. Dave Tanner, 6563 Valinda, stated commercial areas should definitely be kept separate from the residential arena. Ile bought his home in this particular area due to the fact there wan all residential development in the area. At the present time, lie can see the mountains from his hone; however, if a shopping center is developed it will block his view. Mary McNamee, stated she moved to this area from Downey. She lived next to a Junior high School and off of two major streets. It was not the kind of area you would want your children to grow up around. She moved here for the peace and quiet. She does not want her children to live in an area where they are afraid to walk out their front door. Mr. David Delgado, 6646 Mesada, stated there are many people in the audience here In opposition to the zone change. It is his opinion the people that live in the area should have some say no to what is developed around them. More schools and parka are needed in the City instead of commercial development. Chairman Rempel stated the City has no control over the schools as the school district is-an entirely separate entity. The City has worked since incorporation to get schools and their problem solved. The City is trying to find funding for schools. Mr. Robert Todd, 6232 Cartilla Avenue, stated this City needs street sweepers and needs to take care of drainage problems. We need to take care of what is currently in the City before new commercial is developed. We also need more parks. Planning Commission Minutes -4- February 25, 1980 A M, 0 a Chairman Hempel stated. the City currently door not have the money for parka, street nwoopern, etc. Who in going to pay for the parks? It is up to the ciLizano of the connnunity to work with the school diatrict and agree to pay higher taxes to have now schools. Mr. Mark Whituhend, 6542 Valinda, stated lie is in apposition to the zone change and can not ace a need for coamercial development in thin area. Chairman ltempel stated this Cmmniootou can not deny a developer to come in and submit: n zone chnnge request. That is why the zone change is before thn Comnia- sion fur public hearing. Mr. Jack Sylvester, applicant, stated in 1966 a shopping contev permit wag granted for thin area on Haven and Bighland. La.aon Avenue at that time was abandoned by the County of San Bernardino. Ile made it possible for the people to develop Lemon Avenue so they could comply with County requirements to have a 60' wide street. When John Slayney woo retained an the General Plan Consultant lie recommended at one time that the entire SO acres be a regional shopping center. Only when lie discovered that 1.4 odd acres could be taken for a right of way for the proposed Foothill Freeway and interchange on that corner was it downgraded to a community shopping center area. lie then found in going to the Planning Staff that although Caltrnns notified him in writing that they would not stand in the way of development, it was suggested that hu move any commercial site to Lemon Avenue and that tie voluntarily agrea to a CC b 11 prohibiting access or egress on Lemon Avenue for any commercial project. lie raised no opposition and voluntarily agreed to sign the CC b It's. Their project, an proposed, will not block anyones view of the mountains. Their buildings would not exceed 22' in height. The Planning Division will also insist on a landscaping buffer en Lemon Avenue and they will do their beat to screen any unpleasant aspects that may arise. They are not propos{nng any development that is not in the best interest of the City. They are prepared to sit down with any committee to work out anything which is fair and reasonable that is in the beat interest of the community. President of Watt Commercial Properties, stated for the people in the audienca, lie would like to state that the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted one of the strictest development standards within Southern California. In regard to property values, the homes built around their existing developments hav a increased in valae. With the adoption of Proposition 13, one of the few remaining items left to create income for a City is shopping center development. He hoped that the City would look favorably on their request. Mr. Dave Mulligan, 6620•M eoada Street, stated when he moved to his home this area was basically a rural area. There was all kinds of wildlife and nature ti,.. around. They moved to an area which he hoped his children could grow up, have animals and be able to live in a rural area. They are in opposition to the zone change and asked that the Commission consider what the people living in the area want. Mr. Steven Beck, 6233 Carrillo, stated the fact that the developer does not live _ in this City says a lot for the project. Those living in this area will have ® to continue living with any development that may go in, but the developer will leave the area once the development is completed. Planning Commission Minutes -5- February 25, 1980 Mr. Sid gilliman, 6316 Haven Avenuo, stated tic is in opposition to the zone change. Ila stated at the time the General Plan wns adopted for thin area, ' n number of people did come to the Comniosion and object to the designation of commercial development. They also submitted a letter and petition to that effect. There being no further eommenta from the nudionca, Chairman Hempel cloned lb public hearing. Conuniusionor Tolotoy naked how long the noteriok tins been at that intersection. Mr. Lam stated it has boon there since July of 1978. Commissioner Jones stated she disapproved of the commercial designation at the time of the General Plan hearings. Also it in her opinion cloven Avenue should be developed as a scenic route. For that reason she tine been opposed to the asterisk shown on the General Plan throughout the whole process. Comnissioner Garcia stated hin concern at the present time regarding thin pro- perty is that it is taking only a port ion of the total 80 acres. It has been our policy to request master planning of major parcels of land. The applicant hoe a right to ask for the best investment of his property and at the name time the residents around the area have a right to protect this project. In terms of a zone change for thin property at this time, he feels that it !a not time. Commissioner Dahl stated in his review of comments received from the audience, he tins to separate the emotional from the factual points brought out. In regard to increased crime, in looking at the conters on 19th and Carnalian, we have not been affected in that area with a major crime increase and have no reason to believe we would be affected in this area. On the other hand, there would be a definite increase in traffic. There would be a possible increase in debris as indicated. lie doesn't necessarily feel tint property values would go down because of commercial development in the area. A valid point is the possible over - building of commercial development in the City, as there are a number of units that are vacant now. On the emotional side is the liquor statements made. Students from the college can get liquor any place if they want it, and we can not eliminate that. From a factual standpoing is the drainage problem. Ile would agree with Commissioner Garcia that we are not ready for a center at this location at this particular time; however, he would not want to shut the door to that center being developed in the future either. More evaluation of thia particular proposal is needed. Commissioner Tolotoy stated the asterisk was placed at this location as it was felt by the Commission and the Council that this would be a good location for a commercial center, tie would agree with the other Commissioners, however, that this is not the time for this particular change of zone. This is not to say that this Coimnissinn will never feel a center would be appropriate for this area. Chairman Rempel a -ted in regard to statements made that the City should keep some of its land open, the City is working with the County to develop a wildlife habitat restricted from vehicles, etc. We can not say that we are never going to allow a property owner to develop his land as the City would then get into Planning Commission Minutes -6- February 25, 1980 0 0 0 inverue condeun:ation which Menem the City would be forced to buy that persons land. Ile stated it Ilan been discussed on-many occanluns that we noed'approxl- mately 10,000 residents in nn area for another whopping canter, therefore, it is nlso his opinion that a center at thin location is premature at thin time, In regard to drainage, if water starts coming down Haven without any fneility to accept that wator, it would alno have a serioun impact becaunu of the amount of runoff. Ile foolo it is totally premature to develop a center within the next two or three years. A motion was made by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Tolatoy to deny 'Lone Change No. 80 -02 without prejudice. AYES., DNB., TOLSTOY, JONES, CARCIA, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT! NONE 9e M M # A Receno called at 9:05 P.M. Meeting rcconvcn-�d at 9:30 p.m. with all Commisnioners present. rM A * It A PUBLIC HEIJI.ING ® NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND SITE APPROVAL N0. 80 -01 - NONE AND ASSOCIATES - Pro- posed shopping center to be located on the southwest corner of Lemon and Haven. Michael Vairin, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Staff recommends. approval of Resolution No. 80 -07 subject to the following amendments: Condition 115: A ratio of 20% of the trees to be planted on the Bite shall be specimen size trees to be 36" box trees. Amend Condition h7 to read: No additional food uses may be permitted within the center unless parking requirements of the zoning ordinance can be met and that such use is specifically reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. Chairman Rempel asked for questions from the Commission of the staff. Commissioner Dahl asked that staff review for the Commission the comments by the Design Review Committee- Michael Vairin reported the Design Review Committee reviewed the project and requested redesign of the service station which has been complied with somewhat. Mr. Hogan added that the application will improve Lemon Avenue if the Commission �., considers approval of the site approval. There is also a pooling of water in this area during the rainy season. The applicant will be required to install S' a major drainage structure to handle the water, so that it will not cause pro- blems for downstream properties. Mr. Vairin stated one letter was received from the Carden ApartMent Homeowners Association, expressing objection to the proposed development. This letter has been forwarded to each Commission member for review and is on record in the Planning Division. Ile reported in addition, numerous telephone communications T in opposition to the development have been received. Planning Commission Minutes -7- February 25, 1980 ® ® . • . . There being no further questions from the Conunissi.ou of ntaff, Chpirman Rompel opened thu public hnaring. Mr. Doug Ilane, 7333 Hollman Avenue, stilted they have owned thin site for approximately 3 yearn. Thu original Chaffey plan which was done for thin community n number of years ago depicted the commercial designation nt thin intersection. Tito back portion of the site in proposed for the Shibuta Nursery. They have tried to buffer the site in a village theme. lite plan will represent the high development standards of thin community. Plans are now before Caltrann that Lammon and Raven will be major streets in the West End of San Bernardino next to Euclid Avenue. Commissioner Jones asked Mr. Ilona if they would object to a one story office building if it is found thin could cause problems to the apartment complex next to thin development. Mr. Ilona stated they would be willing to reduce the second story; if their engineer determineo that the uecond ntory would take from the view of the Garden Apartments. Mr. Sid Silliman, 6316 Haven Avenue, stated lie would hope that tlu Commisoion would see fit to add some additional conditions to the Resolution if approval of the development is considered. lie would specifically like to spank in opposi- tion to the pan station and fast food restaurant, as lie feels these developments would have the moat impact on the residents in the area. Tito com.)ination of the two would have a detrimental effect on traffic then what currently exists in the arc3 now. it will load to n significant increase in traffic on Bevan and Lemon Avenues. lie would like to suggest that a fast food establislunent not be approved in thin location. We need a high quality sit -down restaurant. The com- bination of a fast food drive -in and Eno station will lead oignificanely to litter and increase of traffic. Consequently, there would also be an increase in van - doliom. lie asked that the gas station and foot food restaurant not be approved at this location. Children meet in this area to catch the school bus and increased traffic in the area could cause % negative impact. Mr. George Godlin, 6344 haven Avenue, stated he is in opposition tc, the proposal from a conceptual and planning standpoint. He would not like to have a gas station as a neighbor to him. Ile does not see any need for an additional center in the City at this time. The area is also subject to a tremendous amount of flooding. This will cause a host of problems and he can not see building deeper and deeper into the foothil3q. tie finds Mr.Ilona`s proposal totally unacceptable. Tile economics of what the center will turn into is largely going to be dictated by the economics of the market place. Those living in the Garden Apartments take a great deal of pride in the development. it is heavily landscaped and they pay a heavy price to keep the landscaping up in a rural setting. He feels this is a complete affront to them and will not compliment their area. Mary McNamee stated due to the gas crunch, lines will be backed up for blocks. There is no indication that the gas crunch is going to be ending soon. If we have cars backed up for blocks trying to get gas in addition to the college traffic, she. stated there will be problems of getting out of the tract to get to work. She would also agree that a fast food restaurant should not be allowed but a sit down type restaurant is needed. She would not object to the development of the nursery in this location. Her opposition was also to the gas station and fast food restaurant. Planning COmnission Minutes -8- February 25, 1980 • . Mr. Roland Dmlttt, stated ha in in opposition to the gnn ntntiou. Mont ntationo are not open when thu people need gun at thin time nnywny. •Iiaw call nuyonn with any foresight want to put in a gas otntion when the supply of gas in uneertniu7 Thera will be lines navera) blocks long whan there in gas available. 'thin dovolopmant will have more than a minimum impact on the area. Ila would not object to n large nursery and high qunlity restaurant rather than n gnn station at thin location. Mr. Greg Juntica, 6330 llnvan, gritted lie in in opposition to tine two story structure nn At will destroy tha privacy of 0 or 9 units within the Garden Apartments. Mr. Ilavo Mulligan, 6620 Monada, otated the drainage problem in the area in going to be quite extensive. They turn to go into their tract at 19th and Ilaven. During the last rain, they had 2 to 3 feat of water over onto the road. An extensive review of the drainage problems need to be made prior to any develop- In-_;"t. A resident of the area, ntated Ilia child in picked up every morning on Cartill.n and Lomon at the scliool buo stop. What is going to happen when there to a line up of cars going to tine gnu station facility? lie naked if the station will be a salf- sorvc or full nerve gasoline station. Will it be a station that tires can be changed and minor car repairs will be dona7 Ile in elso in opposition to the fast food restaurant. in the gas station going to be a company owned station or leaned otntion? I i A representative of Mobil Oil. Corporation stated they are going to be bringing in over a Iw ndrr_d thousand gallons o£ gasoline a month to this City, which in desparately needed. There will be a number of gasoline pumps which will help serve the customers faster. They would like to have a company owned station; however, it is not known at thin time whether or not it will be. However, if it is not company owned they would like to have atcict controls over the dealer. The station will be both self - .: saws and full serve. The station would be removed if it in found after a period of time that it in not profitable. Mr. Allen, owning property within the Garden Apartments, stated he would like to go on record in support of Mr. Hone's proposal, providing safeguards for landscaping, buffering, and architectural control are met. Mr. Allen Snapp, Architect for the proposed development, stated the character of this development was quite a concern to them. They took a hard look at the winery character of the area. lie reviewed .he proposed plans for the Commission. It was felt the nursery location as proposed was the best location for buffering of the apartment complex. Mr. Ilona stated if it is found the view of the apartments will be blocked by the second story atrucutre of the development, they are willing to change their design. Also, if he can attract a dinner house restaurant he is willing to cut down on his pad area in the main part of the center. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Hempel closed the A public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -9- February 25, 1980 { Commissioner Tolatoy utnted it wan mentioned earlier that the drainage facility is Haven at thtu time wan not big enough to take any moto water. lie naked if this daveloptnent will bo responsible to alleviate thin problem. Mr. Hougunu atnted the Haven Avenue ditch in a flood control facility. The Flood Control Dlotriet will be reviewing thin matter at the time the application in made by the developer. Conunionioner Garcia otnted it in his opinion a Via station in needed and that thin would ba a good location for such a facility. it in also his opinion there lit a noud for come typo of economical fast food service due to the college in the area. It in the management that could create problems, not the service. Cotiminnionor Tolatoy ntated Haven Avenue in one of the major north /nouth stracto iu the City. If we can't handle the traffic on thin street with title development, than we do have a problem. The only problem he can see with traffic in where would the+ peopla line up to got to, the gun station. lie does not feel, however, that traffic in and out of thu project in going to be a problem. lie stated his only problems with the developments are as follows: The Gordon Apartments have a lot of nice vinunl effects with their landscaping. Ile would like to see the south side of the project have a specific, landscape plan indicating where the trees will be placed and possibly add more trees to that area. It is also his opinion the center should be landscaped to bland in and compliment what in already developed on the Garden Apartment site. lie stated an additional condition should be added to the Reuoltition stating 50% of the parking area shall be shaded by vegetation within 15 years. Commissioner Dahl stated in regard to thin center, there will be such a few shops in it that it in very unlikely that there will be any vacancies and the center should be a vi.ablo one. It in ht:t opinion a traffic light as proposed at the inter- section will slow down traffic along Haven Avenue and would be leas of a hazard. lie would ulno like to nee landscaping increased along the southerly and of the property. An additional condition should be addud as followst Phase 3 (second story coratruction) aita31 be returned to tho Planning Commission prior to issuance of the building permits to determine if such addition would block views of resi- dents to the south. Chairman Rempel stated in regard to the service station, it is his opinion the canopy should be lowered. Ile has no objection to the station itself; however, if the canopy is lowered, it would be much more effective then the high canopy in this location. lie would like to nee a bicycle and pedestrian lane coming into this center no this would be a very viable type of client to have in this area. Comm."Losioner Tolatoy stated if we can bring another hundred thousand gallons of gasoline into this City, people would be buying gas in our City and we would gat the benefit of the gas tax. We need this tax to help improve our roads. A motion was trade by Commissioner Garcia and seconded by Commisuioner Tolatoy to approve Resolution No. 80 -37 subject to the following amendments and addi- tions: Planning Commission Minutes -10•- February 25, 1980 i '. P Amend tho following runditionn: 1. Condition lilt Tito development planu on file in the Planning Division indicate severnl buildings and unan. Of those indi- cated, the nuracry, the service station and the retail buildings were approved by the Commission. Tito second story office addi- tion and drive thru ractnurant ware approved in concept only. Final review and approval by the Planning Commisuion in required for these two uses. (; 2. Condition q5: A ratio of 20X of the trans to be pinntod on the t�. site shall be specimen size trees to be 36% box trees. 3. Condition p7: No additional food uses msy be permitted within the canter unless parking requirements oL the zoning ordinance can be mat and that such use is specifically reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. 4. Condition #16: All parking lot landscaped islands shall have n minimum inside dimension of 41 and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall enclosed by a 6" raised P.C.C. curb. Add the following conditions: 5. Phase 3 (second story construction) shall be returned to the Planning Commission prior to Issuance of building permits to determine if such addition would block views of residents to the nouth. 6. If the gasoline station ceases operation an a service station a; after 90 days, the station in to be demolished and removed, and the site io to be lnndocoped. Underground storage tanks shall also be removed. +t 7. Fifty percent of the parking area shall be shaded by vegetation within 15 years. AYES: GARCIA, TOLSTOY, DAHL, JONES, REMPEL NOES: NONE ASSENT: NONE, i Recess called at 11:03 P.M. Meeting reconvened at 11:10 p.m. with all Commissioners present. Planning Commission Minutes -11- February 25, 1980 0 0 NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDIII*.NT NO. 00 -01 - CONDO OONVPR- SIONS - The duvololmont of a condominium convention ordinance. Barry Hogan, Senior Planner, reported thn condominium conversion ordinance noods n little more work prior to presentation to the Cotnuianion. At thin time, Ita would like to have co mnenta from the Coniniusion and requested that the public hearing titan be continued to the March 12, 1900 meeting to allow the Staff the opportunity to consult with the City Attorney in order to clean up items of the langungu in thu ordinance. Ila stated if the Commission doniren to review the ordinance prior to making commonta, they may do no and submit their desires in writing to the Planning Division prior to the next menting for incorporation into the ordinance. Chairman Rempal opened the public hearing. Mr. John Withers, representing the Building Industry Ansociation, stated under Section 5, Conversion Limit Procadure, Item "A° (Annual Limit), they want to maintain the appropriate level of units. In termr of name flexibility there is exceptions that state if found appropriate (using specific findings) the Comeia- sion can approve an additional 25X. They would like to recommend that perhaps if specific findings are found and the Commission would find additional conver- sions nocconary they should be allowed to sat whatever amount that should be. They feel that a five year limit in unnecessary. The ordinance taken careful considerations in looking at conversions and the five year exception in not really necessary. Mr. slogan recommended that the public hearing be left open to the next regular 40 meeting for further review. A motion was made by Commissioner Dahl and seconded by Commissioner Joner to continua the public hearing for Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 80 -01 to the March 12, 1980 Planning Conmission meeting. AYES: DAIB., JONES, GARCIA, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE REQUEST BY HENRY REITER for the use of flags for an industrial leasing office located on the southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald. Henry Reiter, applicant, stated they in the past, have advertised in every local paper trying to get losses for their industrial offices. They have not gotten one leao.: from the newspaper. They requested that flags be allowed in order to tell people that they are there and have something to offer, otherwise people will just drive on by. In reality, the only way they can get tenants is by people driving by. Ile would like to know what they can do as we need to come up with some way of helping each other. Planning Commission Minutes -12- February 25, 1980 AWL Commissioner Tolatoy stated he dean not lilca.flnrn. However, he would Like Mr. Raitor to come back to the Commission with n plan to san bxnctly what ha in planning at: thin location in liou of flags. Mr. Bob Clnrk, representing ltaiter Development, stated what they are trying to achieve in to nttrnct attention in as tanteful a way an ponsibin and for n i reasonable period of time. Mr. Lam stated at issue in whether or not the Commission wants to allow another torn of advertisement. We have gone through the adoption of the sign progrnm where the Co:minnion line said chic in the typo of sign program they wanted in the community. We have also tried to develop a 4- ,nporary off -site Dion program for subdivisions. The direction at that time w,._ that all flags ware to come down. The issue in whether or not flags are legitimate an a method of attracting a tenant to a site. The prevent ordinnnee does not recognize thin an a logitimato method of advertising in this City. Commissioner Dahl stated to promote future development in our City, people like Mr. Reiter have to be able to lance their project. Tito problem we have is to determine what it takes for our City to help a developer promote his p_.54,ct. Ito would lilta to see us develop some type of permit (renewable withit, h =artain amount of time) with the condition that at any time the permit could be revoked. Ile stated lie is opposed to flogs, but also fooln that if it generates more business for the community an a whole and serves a purpose of helping to increase our own revenues and improving the City than something should be worked out. Mr. Hogan stated if this is the Commissions' desire, lie would suggest that staff work with the applicant to review alternative programs other than flags for the development. Chairman Rempal stated there has to be some way to come to an agreement with Mr. Reiter. He dons not know if he would have that much objection to well designed flags for advertising purposes. However, he also feels there map be other methods of attracting attention to a development. One of those might be to landscape the front along Archibald and Arrow and plane a monument sign at thin location. A motion was made by Commissioner Rempel and seconded by Commissioner Garcia to continue review of thin matter to the next regular Planning Commission meeting of March 12, 1980 requesting that Mr. Reiter present alternative methods For advertising at this location. AYES: REMPEL, GARCIA, DAHL, JONES, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE ipl +!, Planning Commission Minutes -13- February 25, 1980 V, t; 0 0 1- 'LlB'1' BY CIIAFpEY COLLLIGE for use of an off -nito directional sign for the ChnCfey College Skills Crater. Yatld can Brindell, Division Chairperson for the Chaffay College Vocational Skills Contort requested that tl:e Comlmiosion consider npprovnl of directional nlgning to their facility on Foron Street. Duo to the newness of the locution aiu! its lack of vini.bility they are plagued by atudnnta calling then to help find their, classes. 81811ing would help alleviate each confusion. Comnianioner Garcia naked if there in special Provisions within the sign ordinance for schools and colleges. Mr. Lam stated the sign kionk with the temporary diructional signing for oubdi- vinio::a could possibly be a location for such a sign; however, the college would havd to pay for a slot on the sign program. Commissioner Tolotoy stated in his opinion it would 1,o to the advantage of tl:e developers to place tl:e location of schools on their sign kiosk program. it would also be to their advantage to indicate where the library, and possibly even historical landmarks are within the City. Mr, iiogan stated we can put Chaffay in touch with the sign company; however, they will need to work out a private agreement with them. A notion was made by Commissioner Will and seconded by Commissioner Garcia to allow two directional vigno for the skillu center; one at the corner of 9th and Archibald and one at the corner of 9th and Nelms. Tito signs should fit tl:e standard kiouk signs for tl:e City which is presently utilized. AYES: DAHL, GARCjLA, JONES, TOLSTOY, REMPEL NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE Mr. Lam stated a General Plan Amendment has been requested by the Lewis Develop- ment Company. The property is located in the area at tl:e extreme north and of Etiwanda Avenue north of our City limits for 453 acres of land. The Ian Bernardino County Planning Commission will be reviewing this matter at thb.,r metcing tomorrow and staff would like to request some direction from the Commission in regard to thin matter. lie reported Michael Vairin will give some background into this matter. Mr. Vairin stated Lewis Development Company in proposing a General Plan Amendment from n rural conservation designation to a one -acro residential density which 18 extremely high for this area and above what the General Plan calls for in that area. The County had requested an environmental impact report; however, Lewis has appealed that decision. Staff would like to request that the Commission go on record recommending that the. County deny the appeal and require a full EIR. Planning Commission Minutes -14- February 25, 1980 V A Motion wau made by Coauniouioner Tolotoy, necouded by Coimninnionnr Gnrcin and unanimouoly carriO to support the County of San Darnardilio in thoir reconmendatLott anking fo: a full LAIR for the General Plnn Amendment. 0 e h fi fi ft h Upon motion by Commionionor Dahl, seconded by Comminoioner Itompal and unnni- mounly carried, it woo voted to adjourn the Planning Commisnion meeting of February 25, 1980. Muoting adjournod at 12115 p.m. Ito pectfully uubmitted.. JACK LAM, Director u: Community Development Planning Commission Minutes -15- February 259 1980 U 11r&. LAM CITY OF PANCHO CUrWINGA STAFF REPORT Datot February 25, 1980 Tot Planning Commission Fromt Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subjects NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARC14. MAP NO. 5tf91 rnuaautstc - Request to divide approximately 0.92 acres into two (2) parcels in the R -1- 20,000 zone located on the southwest corner of Hillside Road and Hellman Avenue dACKGRnUND: 1'he applicant is requesting to divide approximately 0.92 acres of land into too (2) parcels as followat Pnrcol No. Acrenge ® 1 0.46 (209059 sq. ft.) 2 0.46 (20,074 eq. ft.) This review is for environmental elearnnee of the project only and does not constitute approval of ttte Parcel Map or future development. This subdivision will create two (2) "buildable" residential lots of approxi- motely 20, 000 eq+tare feet, which is the minimum lot size permit+�d in the R -1- 20,000 zone. The General Plan designates this area no Very i - w Residential with 1/2 acre minimum lot size. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: Tito site is presently undeveloped, and is vacant of structures or significant vegetation. Tito site is surrounded by existing single family residences. The site is not known to co oanier-cultu"411- or historic artifacts. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS- Part of the Initial qt +.�i:�= E. tn�o�attY- d. revi es no significant environmental impacts cre ted by this pro - r Staff has field- chock•;d the site, completed the env ronmental checklist, 1.i and found no significant adverse environmental lopacto. ITEM "A" Nagntivu Declaration for I'arcel Map No. 5092 February 25, 1900 Page 2 RiSCDMMLNDATIO11 it in recomnwnded tbot a Negative Declaration be issued for Parcel Map No. 5092 based upon review of tho Initial Study and tho finding of no significant ndvaroa iu:pacts upon the environment. Runpectfully nu matted, JACK LAM, Director of rmmnunity Development JL :DC:mu Attactur,ent: Part I, Initial Study Parcel Map 0 0 0 0 0 c To ENTo ATI V P,4 RC EL Mr4P NO 5892 IN THE CITY OF HANCHO.CUCAMONOA OCINO A UIVIOION OF A 11011TION OF VIC CART ONC•IIALr OF LOT I, DLOCKIO, CUCAMONGA IIOMCOTCAU ADOOCIATION AO NCCOIIOCD IN DOCK 0 OF MAFO, PAIlt 40 1 IICCONDO OF CAN DCIINANDIIIO COUNTY, CALIrONNIA OWNIAI A A IrYA IVwYY q10 IM SwWI fMYb CA 9144 (IICI ISI•MR ii LA y0 ralr na• sire —Lr_.. � rB /Sr Ntl II w M' N'N'I — ILtiL7'S�— ftAq - _.I ys -J:sw . i 111' 1 A rrr:rnu II 101 -- -- 1- - - - - -. - J. S. B. C A 0 VICINITY MAP, EXIST ZONE s LAND USE RI -20 SURROUNDING ZONE RI -20 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 1112 UNITS PER ACRE VERY LOW DENSITY �I SIACT 1 OF 1 39 '1 'c p0AVAG 0�'1 SA OAI[1 • CC WO [CIC — set OAS — IlcOt, FNOYI —I, I [. -Id Irl W..? 41 Nr �i I 1 � 1 ,YNWII MMI I III /YINM II� I MhYI NM1 I I� IWIIIw.Y III ,� YrxlSr offs PARCEL J l I }I1 (FARC I. op A t -^ NGt ty. J =• -. i 111' 1 A rrr:rnu II 101 -- -- 1- - - - - -. - J. S. B. C A 0 VICINITY MAP, EXIST ZONE s LAND USE RI -20 SURROUNDING ZONE RI -20 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION 1112 UNITS PER ACRE VERY LOW DENSITY �I SIACT 1 OF 1 39 '1 'c p0AVAG 0�'1 SA OAI[1 • CC WO [CIC — set OAS — IlcOt, FNOYI —I, I [. CITY OC RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY 9 PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET — To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Foot $70.00 lror all projects requiring environmental review, thin form must be completed and aubmittod• to the Uovnlopmant Roview Committee through the department whoro the project application in made. Upon recoipL• of .thin application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial SLUdy. The Development Review CommnitL•oe will moot: and Lake action no later than Lon (10) days before the public meeting at which Limo the project is to be heard The Committee will make one of three dotorminations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant- giving further information concerning the pruposed project. PROJECT TI'T'LE: PARCEL MAP NO. 5892 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Cynthia L. Prescher NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE A F PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: SAME AS ABOVE LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL M.) SW COR HELLMAN AND HILLSIDE A.P. NO. 1061 - 621 -05 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: NONE Y -1 i , 1 ® 3 D'Ir T mr.seltiPTION ;1 DESCRIPTION OF PROJEM SUB- DIVISION Divide exist 'hg 40,000 sq, ft, parco n O wi o iO,QD sq. p5r ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE MOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS# IF ANY: 0.92 acres, No existing _ buildings or structures and none proposed aT—Ei s me, owovor; iuturo singTc�mily res ences are propose 0 DIMCRIDE TIMENVIRONMEN'PAL SET'T'ING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOMINTION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENXC ASPECTS, USE of SURR.OUNDINO PROPERTIES, AIM THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEE'PS)t 1 Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? Nn I -2 . j WI T11, Tnrr, ru0,711M rxplanat•ion of any yns answors abovo: YMPORTMU : If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIPICATIO N: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the fnctn, statements, and informnti.on presentee are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belf.ef. I further undcrntand tint additional information may bl:: required to be submitted before an Adequate evaulation can be made by the Develop ncnt Review Committee. Date ka-21, 1980 Signature df(2 "o.70Lt,...!.,. Title OWNER M N X_ 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? .__ 2. Cro,ato a substantial change in existing noina or vibration? .� 3. Cron -to a substantial change in demand for municipal servicos (police, Fire, water, flowage, etc.)! ._K .. 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X— S: Ramowo any existing treou?. How many?�� 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous matorialo such as toxic: subatancos, flammables or explosives? rxplanat•ion of any yns answors abovo: YMPORTMU : If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIPICATIO N: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the fnctn, statements, and informnti.on presentee are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belf.ef. I further undcrntand tint additional information may bl:: required to be submitted before an Adequate evaulation can be made by the Develop ncnt Review Committee. Date ka-21, 1980 Signature df(2 "o.70Lt,...!.,. Title OWNER M N E Datat Tot Fromt Subject: CITY OF 1tANCUO CUCAMONGA F)TAFF REPORT February 25, 1900 Planning Commission Jack Lam, Director of Community Development J - NI. I.VA - � �l�iT Q � lJr e. 1� r Request to divide approximately Z.'L acres into Lour lfl! parcels in the R -1 zone located between Summit Avenue and Shasta Avenuo, adjacent to Etiwanda Avenue DACOROUNDt The applicant is requesting to divide approximately 2.2 acres of lend into four (4) parcels as followat Parcel No. Acrenp.a 1 0.550 (23,958 sq. ft.) 2 0.552 (24,044 eq. ft.) 3 0.550 (23,958 ,.y. ft.) 4 0.552 (24,045 sq. f•.) This review is for environmental clearance of the project and does not constitute approval of the Parcel Map or future development. This subdivinion will create four (4) "buildable" lots greater than 1/2 acre which exceed the minimum lot size required by the zone. The General Plan designates this area as Windrow Residential which requires one - third acre minimum lots. I ,� "ON ;- 7 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The site is presently un eveloped and is vacant of structures and lwe an a 'M row on iortt The site is bordered on the es ani we— at by citrus groves, gra e s n a family lots on the south, and single family homes on the north. The si_e in ear knnvn to contain scenic, cultural, or historic art faatn r ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study, attached for your review, indicates no significant environmental impacts created by this pro- ject. Staff tine field- checked the site, completed the environmental check- list, and found n7- significant: adverse environmental impacts. ITEM "II" I 'MM it Nelyttiva Uaclarntitom Vnbnurry 250I900 1'nyo 2 ,I ,i rl'.• 1 PTl 1I 1111' • •I i ' f I Jd' ' 1 11 i, I •� ),f l ' 1,r �'pi I , to;; 1 'll il, I II I � �� 11� ') ' „ I I , I, ryl.i I I,li' I ' ' �'1�;' J,,'I �li'•I �Y .1 • I Y:, L IS ; y, • I "I it 1 I 1 I •� ),f l ' 1,r �'pi I , to;; 1 I •l. �Y .1 • I Y:, L IS ; y, • I "I it 1 I 1 ...1 5'• , ' 1 1 1,. t I •r 1 Y' T i , 1 '..•.1 t I :•i I •� ),f l ' 1,r �'pi I , to;; 1 I •l. �Y .1 1 I •� ),f l ' 1,r �'pi I , to;; ir� •l. 1 :•i i. 1 I A' II' r. �1 �• �11 1 Yom. Y �v 11 a oa CO o� a4�W� U Qua a EI u �a H �R� N i 1 �i iiii0 • II M� Ny J 3 I ;• j/ •l / 1 ' ' I '' I 3 Ko CI'T'Y OF HANC110 CIICAfIU)IGA INITIAL STUDY PAR'P I -- PROJECT XNVORh1ATXON i11L'C'1' - To be ron+ploLed by applicanL L•'nvironmonLal AnnouumetlL• Roviuw 1 °1co: S %0.00 I'or nll projecLn requiring environmonL•nl review, L•his form munt be corr+ploL•ad and submiL'Led Lo L•he lfevolopmant Review ConvniL'too Lhrouclh L1io duparlanc +nL tolrero the Project application is madn. Upon receipt of this application, Lila 13nvironment'al Anelyniu uLnrf will prop. Part II of Lhe Xnitinl• Study. The Devolopmcv+t It,, CornmiLLoe will moe: nnd Lake acL•ion no later than ton (10) dnyn before tho public meeting at whirl, Lima Lila project: is Lo' be heard. ':ho ConunitLee will m,11,0 ono of three doterminationn: 1)"1110 project will have no environmental impacL• and a NegaLivo DoclarnLfon will ba: filed, 2) The project will have an drlvironmonLal impacL and an I ;nvironrnental Impact ReporL wi -ll be prepared, or 3) An additional inforrnaL•ion report should be suppli.ecl by the applicant giving fur.Lher inforrnaL•ion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Parcel Nap No. 5891 APPLICANT'S NAME, e1DDIZESS, TELI.PIION': _�. _-_ CI'T'Y OF HANC110 CIICAfIU)IGA INITIAL STUDY PAR'P I -- PROJECT XNVORh1ATXON i11L'C'1' - To be ron+ploLed by applicanL L•'nvironmonLal AnnouumetlL• Roviuw 1 °1co: S %0.00 I'or nll projecLn requiring environmonL•nl review, L•his form munt be corr+ploL•ad and submiL'Led Lo L•he lfevolopmant Review ConvniL'too Lhrouclh L1io duparlanc +nL tolrero the Project application is madn. Upon receipt of this application, Lila 13nvironment'al Anelyniu uLnrf will prop. Part II of Lhe Xnitinl• Study. The Devolopmcv+t It,, CornmiLLoe will moe: nnd Lake acL•ion no later than ton (10) dnyn before tho public meeting at whirl, Lima Lila project: is Lo' be heard. ':ho ConunitLee will m,11,0 ono of three doterminationn: 1)"1110 project will have no environmental impacL• and a NegaLivo DoclarnLfon will ba: filed, 2) The project will have an drlvironmonLal impacL and an I ;nvironrnental Impact ReporL wi -ll be prepared, or 3) An additional inforrnaL•ion report should be suppli.ecl by the applicant giving fur.Lher inforrnaL•ion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Parcel Nap No. 5891 APPLICANT'S NAME, e1DDIZESS, TELI.PIION': _�. _-_ NAME, ADDRESS,. TELEPHONE 01' PERSON TO DL CONTACTED _ CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Linville- Sanderson -horn E Asso('•, Attn: Robert A. }corn, 9587 Arrow Route, Suite Ii, Ranc c+ Cucamonga, --- A 91730 714/980- 1211 --- LOCATION of PROJECT (STREIST ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCE1'. No.) Bb tween Summit avenue and Shasta Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue. LIST OTHER PERMT..TS NECESSARY 1 °ROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATr AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCII PERMITS: Buildi� - Rancho Cucamonga X-1 I � , a'IiOJ EG''I' 1)1 °SCIII P'I' CON • DESCI H'TION OF PROJECT: nubdivlde the nxintinR property into 4 (roar) parce.cs, — , ACREAGE Or PIIOJCCT AIICA AND SQUARE 1"QOTAGE Or EXISTING AND 'PIIOPOSFD DUILDINGSt IF ANY: 2.z _ren The nroponod buildint,a me approx. 2000 nc, rt. DLSCRIVE THE SEPT: NG Or Tllr•. PROJECT SIT11, INCLVDIIIG INPOPI- MTIOid ON IO1'OGM''1PIlY, pl.,h1.rpS (TIIV ), NIMALS, Ally CULTURAL, HISTORICAL Olt SCI: ".iIIC ASPECTS, IIEi; OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND TIM, DES61IP'1'ION Or ANY BUSTING STRUCTURES AND '1HEXIt USr (ATTACH NECESSARY SIIrE'rc;) TIIIZ Dronerl•v hnn .,., to Summit Avenue._Thore is no existing atructures.�ry1,110 �_ground No ea Eently to the south. Thin pronerty is bound d by. a'L'ree s on it. r,, wCo u s Ana soutn sides, _ Is the project-, part of a larger project, one of n series - of cumulative actions, which nlL•hough individually small,. may as a whole have significant environmental impact? N y , r • wzt.r.'rilrr) 1 +lsn ;n,c•r• 5't: tcc� ---- X� 1. CreuLe a uubuLunLic►1 chango in grou►+d cossLouru? --- .x �• create a nubnL•anL•inl chunJo in axiutiniJ noiue or vibrationl .X_ 3• Cr. (Inte a us►bnl:aIIU.Ul chungo in demand 1'or municipal t►ervicea (police, f•iro, wat:or„ aowaga, otc.)? general era churur.0 in L-110 e�iuLing zoning or. plan detlignution,? --�- �: RetnovO any existing trooe'? How many? All Creato L•ho 'seed for uue or disposal of pot.enLially ha: ;ardoun mnter.ialn ouch as LOxic substances. fltlltunnblots or explon.tven? hxp).unation of any YrS nnnwers above: `ll,, it wily �bee. lh.�s�sary to {tees because of the location ' n TM _PO RT11P IP ; Xf L•he project involves the construction of renidenLial units, compleL•o next page. the form on L}ia above .nN: X hereby cerLify that Lhe statements furni ©hed above and in L•Yse attached exhibit, presenL the data and i.nlormaL.ion s :squired for Lhi.t: ini.l•ial evaluaL•i.on L•o the best or my nbiliL•y, and thaL the racL•r., :;t:aLemcnLu, and information presonted are true and correct to Lhe beat of my 1:no;.'lcclgc Mitt belief. X further understand tlnt additional information may )+r: required to ba submitted before Co mitLeel:e evaulation can bo made by tlse ucvc+lopmc•nt Revic;+• CrnumiL•4•ce. bate / -.mss - VO ) Signature y� ty�, ,��t ✓� Title 0 r'1 L' J CITY OF RANatU CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Datat Pubruory 250 1900 1,01 V1.1111ning comminuion Front Jack LLm, Diractot of Community Development r Subj (jet l NRGAa DECLARATION LARATION FOR PARCEL MAP N0. 5441 - aouuut:r: Roquunt to divide approxLnately 8.7 neroa into fourij pnrcolr the R -1 zone located on thr southeast cornkr of Summit and East Avenues BACKGROUND: The applicant in requesting to divide Approximately 0,7 acres of land into four (4) parcels as follawst Parcel No. Acreage 1 0.406 (200299 oq. ft.) 2 0.463 (209168 aq. ft.) 3 J.695 (30,274 nq. ft.) 4 6.616 (280,193 sq. ft.) This review is for environmental clearance of lino project only and does not constitute approval of the Parcel Map or future devolopment. Thin subdivision will create a lagal lot for ownernb.lp purposes of approximatoly 30,274 square feat for an existing residence, and afro create two "buildable" lots which meet the minimum let Giza of the zone. The remainder parcel of 6.6 acres will be available for future land diviniuns and development. The General Plan designates this area an Windrow Residential with a minimum lot size of one -third acre. ENVIRONMENPAL SETTING: The site is an existing lemon grove with a single family house facing East Avenue. The property 1.s bordered on ti -a aauth and cast by citrus groves, vacant land on the west, at,d a public ulLmentary school on the north. TT-3 akue is not kno•u to contain scenic, cultural, or historic artifacts. ENVIRONMENCAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Inicial Study, r.t.tached for your review, indicates no significant env " d imPacs created this klietoj2ct zoStaff Staff has field - checked the site, mp ivte no significant adverse environmental Sz<nacts- ITEM "C" I C1 IT"� i r�l It4� EA Ift �1 I 9 I , , .T. ei^} L• a � ood +m s ss �y 2t for 4r) 1p u 1, � , , 1 1 ILI i .�... All _ .T. ei^} L• a � ood +m s ss �y 2t Negative Declaration for Parcel Map No, 5441 Pubrua y 29, 1900 Page 2 RUCt41ENDATIONt It in recosmanded that a Negative Declaration bu issued for Parcel Map No. 5441 based upon review of the Initial Study and the finding of no uignificnnt advarso Impacts upon the environment. Reap ctfully o ibmit1t�odd, JACK LAM, Director of Community Devololvent JL:DCmm Attachments Part I - Initial Study Parcel Map Ll K� T i .; CITY OR HANC110 CIICAI AM INI'i'IAI, STUDY PAR "! I - I'ROJIXT INFORMATION SWEET - To be comploL•ed by applicullL EnvironmenL•al hanausmenL Roviow roo: ¢,10.00 11 ror nil pro;jecto roqui,ring envirortmentnl review, 01iu form roust be cotnploL•od and submIU-id to L•he UuvalvpmunC ROVicw Col,uniLtee through L•ho duPart:10111; w}lero the Project' applicnUion in made. Upon receipt or. .L•hiu npplicaLion, the Environmontal Annlyeis utnff will prepare Part II of the Initial' Study. 9'110 UR•velopwenC Iteviuw Conunit•Loe will meeL and Lnl-O nrtion no Inter than ten (10) dnys before the public mooting at' which time Lilo project in to' be heard. The Conunitteo %Nq.11 111c0:o one of throw clotorminnLions: 1) Tho project- will huve no environmentnl impact and a NegaL•ive Declaration will bra filed, 2) The project will have nn t :11vironmental impact and nn Enviconmental Impact Report w3.11 be prepnred, or 3) An additional information report nliould be nuppliccl by tho nPplicant giving further informution concorning the PrOPOned project. E PROJECT TITLE: Parcel Map No- 5441 (Revised) M3PLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE:' William J. Schultz, �4 _n Bernardino Road Covina, CA 91722 213/963 =6911 NAME, ADDRESS, ' TELEPHONE•' OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTLD CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Linville- Sanderson -liorn E Assoc. RA ober730 1t A. Horn 9567 Arrow Route, Suite H, Ranc o ucamonga; C 9 _.. LOCATION or PROJECT (STREET 11UDItESS AND ASSESSOR Southeast corner of East Avenue and Summit 225- 191 -06 PARCEL NO. ) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, RMIONAL, STAT11 AND rEDERAI, AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCit PE[iMIT5: Y -j , �r ® 1.'1Ma rm, "SCI2I UMON DI''MCI2IP'i'ION Or PImixT: Divide the existing property into four (4) parcela. ACREAGE OF PIiOJt,CT AREA AND SQUAlu; V)OTAGE Or EXISTING AND PItOPOSF.D UUIiUINCS, II' ANY: 0.7 acreo 110 square feet oxisting build nag and`p000 oquar.e foot proposed buildin+ on Parcel 2. Thare _ is no proposed D15SCRInh THE • [,NVIRONME PAT, SIN'PING 01' Tlir PIJOJECT SI'1'fi INCLIIDIIIG INI'ORI•l1PIOt•1 ON '1'0I'00IL1PIlY, PLAtTI'5 ('CREI's5) , ANIMALS, A14Y CULTURAL, IIISTORICAL Olt SCENIC ASPECTS, USN OF SURROUNDING PPOPrRTILS, AND TIM, DESCILIP'fION OF ANY • EXISTING STRUCTURES AND TIIEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SI11MTS) c Pacing on Eaet Avenue, approx mately 7.00 feet oou l o Summit. There are rows of eucal tus trees on the north - eas -oou� property nes, 1 e ex at ng house a for ® res dennt —al uae. i s . Ic i:he project, part of a larger project, one of a series• of cumulativ,•• actions, t.hich altliounii individually small, may as a whop have significant environmental impact? r NO .X- 2. M • , i s n La) .__ x 1. Cronto tt subnLanL'inl chango in ground ConL•ours? 2. Create n oubnL•antial chungo in exiu(;inv rsoino or vibration? 3. CroaLe it s117)s1:nnL'i.al chnngo in damand for municipal nervican (polico, fire, waL'or, sewage, 0 X 4. CreaLo changes in the eXiul•inc zoning or. vanaral plan designations? . x 5. Remove any ""LinU Lracn? slow many?,__ Not available at this Limo. X G. Create the nvrd for use or dinpot,al o[ potentially isa'rardoun matrr.ia].0 ouch nn L•oxic subsL•anren, i'larmnables or explosives? 1✓xp].anati.on of any 'FS answers above: We will �� enouph lemon trees to locate the house (see attached p!' letter) on proposed Parcel 2, We w 11 have to clean —' X-MPORTnPI'I': If the project involves the construction of next page. units, complete the form on the next page. . PEMPIFICATION: I hereby cerLiry that L•1ie statements furnished above and in the attached exhihi.L , pr_esenL the date and informnt.ion s:egrnired for Lhi.s ini.tia). evnluati.on to Lha be�L oC my ability, and ChnL the facts, n1:aL'omcnts, and informati..on prevented are L•rur_ and correcL to the best of my }cnowledge and belief. I further understand tha t additional informaL'ion may he required to he :;ubnilttecl bofOre an adequaLe evaulation can be made by the l)evulnpnumt RevieW Con;mittee. Date January 22, 1980 Si:,naLuro Z Robert A. Horn Title 14. S. 4563 7: Et CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Onto: February 250 1900 To: Planning Conmisslon From: Jack Loin, Director of Community Development Subject: NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARCEL MAP N0. 62b - DATA DE5 it uoat to divide approximate y 33, 7 cros nto twenty parcola In the M-R -T zone located west of Haven Avenue, approximately 660' north of Foothill Boulevard. BPCKGROUND: The applicant is requesting to divide approximatoiv 3:,.7 acres of land Into twenty (20) parcels as follows: Parcel No. Acreage 1 -6, 10 0.7 30,492 sq. ft.) 7 0.9 39,204 sq. 178, ft.) 8 1.8 408 sq. ft.) 9 1.4 (60,984 sq. ft.) 11, 12 0.5 (21,780 sq. ft.) 13 1.9 (182,764 sq. ft.) 14, 15 2.7 117,612 sq. ft.) 16 3.3 (143,748 sq. ft.) 17 2. 1 (91,476 sq. ft.) 18 3.6 (156,816 sq. ft.) 19 3.5 152 460 so. ft.) 20 3.9 (169,884 sq. ft.) This review is for environmental clearance of the project only and does not constitute approval of the Parcel Map o r future development. This subdivision w'll create three legal 1 o is for ownership purposes for three existing industrial buildings, and also create seventeen (17) "buildable" lots in the M -R -T zone. The Gc noral Plan designates this area as minimum impact ir,.ustry on the west side of Doer Crock and mixed use on the east side of Deer Creek. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The site is par .,all ly covered by vineyards, and has three existing industrial buildings. The property is bordered on the east by Haven, the old winery, and vineyards on the south, single family homes on the west, and a flood control basin on the north. The site is not known to contain scenic, cultural, or historic artifacts. ITEM "D" b,1NNNINq `'v �.('i11nU lY .�•a Y� MwM•= Ybl,.V IIIIIY�Ty `rr 63NI'ANVd%' /O) Ot31ADAuns v �+ "ei ,� rt•O y2, •Ht Yt {TIMJ.IVYViV'I I,VIC) ♦1Y ONIUIINION3 OOOM)1]01 si7n. -- - ^� -• -^ �- b I 2222,,,,, ,,,2 ..•..r::..•..,.•.r„ ,(fli ryU14N al N• OnLC1X.7tf . it Jlv +,•L• -S• 11- �n11!'Yt1 ��1� � f� �� ;� 1 y Ln YtY7tJ I ! U It �..' - «rl • — ..annv i ��i �'f r�•t 1. i f (, .. J , ..,'L .�i� � ! : � v{ �` ..,ti. � - .....� 1,.: III' ..', � ,•L ,,, .� _i� % r�' /�• �^ ,••�� —'='� ..... ! �, f t' �. , . � .... �� 1 C (' ••':,. � ^`rte 5 :�.' _ ... -- IN f r • Z . .i r 1. r r I' 111 ',�'',\ ( �r �° << I it ',•`•�i ! f j / i 11�) .4a111; /� ''N •• \'V•!�..wl^'Nl\ z. iY� �'f•:•••,1. � ' .� �iC ^�i- ' =j�=� = YriIM%- J =a� = ss... —^ _�.:_:..�...f /Li; .L�� =,.N Y"..._= E� +�s¢v:=r —."= �= '•`."_!z'c* I I 271. i I 0'"', � I 4442 8c b1bn1• •�• bwrl•M i 11 _ rt..r /us )• Ham' a•sr a.. I u.ul Negative D,, cOaratlon for Parcel Map No. 5626 robruory 1900 Pago 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study, attached for your review, Ind7catos no significant environmental Impacts created by this projact. Staff has Hold- chocked the site, completed the environmental checklist, and found no significant adverse environmental Impacts. RECOMMENDATIONt It Is recommended that a Negative Declaration be Issued o {'ocol-hop No. 5626 based upon review of the Initial Study and the finding of no significant odvorso impacts upon the onvironmont. R spoctfull submitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:DCtI<ds Attachmonts: Port I - Initial Study Parcel Map ,l ,I (r.M. #5626) CITY OF IMCHO CUCA140NOA INITIAL STUDY 0 N PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SIIEEL' — To be complatad by applicant Environmental Annessment• Review rent $70.00 For all projoctn requiring environmental review, thin form must be completed and submittva'to tha Duvelopmant Review Committee through the department whore the project application is made. Upon receipt of .this application, the Environmental Analysts staff will propara Part II of the Initial SL•udy'. The Duvelopmant Review Committee will meet and L•aRa action no lat..r than Lon (10) clays before the public meeting at which time the project in to be heard. The Conmuitteo will make ono of throe datarminationst 1) The project will have no onvivonmental impact and a Nagative Daclaration will be tiled, 2) The project will have an onvironmontnl impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by tha applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLEt PARCEL MAP #5626 APPLICAr.'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: X425 C_rM'M%_AVENUE; CUCJVONGA, CALIFORNIA 91 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE pr PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT.; LOCKWOOD ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING CO., INC.; 388 W. FOOTHILL PLVD.; RIALTO, CA. 9237 714 - LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) l7E$T OF HAVEN AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 660' NOATR OF FOOTHILL DOULEVMD :4 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CAL1FORNIA. 10T�ti01 =Q5-- LIST OTHER PERt•1ITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAI, AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: rINN". DIVIOION FOR INDUSTRIAL PURF(`: E3. '1 � I gNC►J EC nr,gC :I DESCHYPTION OF PROJECT, DEVELOPER WANTS TO DEVELOP SITE INTO 20 7!;ilUS'1't11'AL JA'1'S TO III: SOLD, ilfiiiT,A'1'L9iDl1 ACREAGE OF PROJECT ARCH AND SQUARE FOOTAGE Or EXISTING AND PROPOSE "D BUILDINGS, it ANY, T11EMIA1115 _3_.I!XISTIM UUILUINnO__ 16000. BUILDING N8 tPAliC1{I/ N1111 JU nPruW .LMVJ:5Li eUIWU. 17V.LLU.Lry no (RAHUH1, . DESCRIBE THE - rNVIROtIMENPAT, SETTING Or THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION UN TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIU ASPECTS, USE Or SURROUNDING Pnopr..RTIES, AND THE DESCRIP'T'ION OF ANY . EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)e THROUGHOUT THE PROPrRTY. PROPERTY IS A PLANER WITH A FALL TO THE SOUT11- WEST UNIr0IU4LY,','ROM THE NORTHEAU'T WITH A SLOPE Or APPNOXIMNITLY THERE ARE NO CUIMMAL, HISTORICAL, OR OCENIC AUPECTO ON THE +' U REM 1C TILL IMS1 OF T!'HE- APPLI(NUTI KNUWLEVUB Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a serioa• of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impart? NO :a . 1 , W�Tx/TN'1'IIIG rlrra,Tres: 1:1111 NO — 1. Cronto u auusLantial change in ground Contours? X 2. Create n aubatnntinl chnngo in oxiating nuino or vibration? ._ ,x 3. Create n subatontinl chnngo in .domnncl fox. municipal sarvicen (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.): _ % 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5: Remove any existing trouall flow many? X_ G. Create the need for use, or disposal of potentially hazardoun materials such an toxic substances, flammnblea or explosives? Explanation of any YPS anowors above: 1 R 9 JMPOR ANT: If t112 project involves the conatructi,n of residential units, comploto the form on the next page. CERTIPICATI017: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exliibita present the data and information required for Lhls initial evaluation to the best or my nwiiLy, and that the facL•a, statements, and informnLi.on presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that; ridditJoi:al information may be required to bo submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Conunittee. TACKWOOD ENG. & SURVEY. INC FOR: DATA DES GN, APPLICANT: Date JANUARY P4- 1990 Signatu` CARLETON W. LCCKWOOD Title PRES. & RCE 9101 Y�� ® CITY OF RANCiIO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Datot February 25, 1900 To: Planning Commission Fromt Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Subject: NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 5760 - O I)O HNE A - to uost to divide approximately r.r acres Into seven 77) parcels In the M -2 zone located on the northeast corner of 6th Street and Milliken Avenue. BACKGROUND: The applicant Is requesting to divide approximately 74.40 acres of land into seven (7) parcels as follows: Parcel No. Acroay1 1 4.5 (196,020 sq. ft. 7. 6.8 (296,203 sq. ft. 3 6.0 (296,200 sq. ft. 4 15.65 sq. ft. 5 J681,714 10.23 4459619 sq. ft. 6 10.03 436,907 sq. ft. 7 9.79 (426,452 sq. ft. This review Is for environmental clearance of the project only and does not constitute approval of the Parcel Map or future development. This subdivision will create seven (7) "buildable" Industrial lots in the M -2 zone. The General Plan designates this area as major industry. Four lots are proposed to be developed at this time, and the remainder parcels will be available for future development. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The site is covered by vineyards and is vacant 57 structures. The site is bordered on the cast, west, and south by vineyards and vacant land, and on the north by the A.T.GS.F. railroad tracks. The site is not known to contain scenic, cultural, or historic artifacts. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study, attached for your review, indicates no significant environmental impacts created by this project. Scoff has field- checked the site, completed the environmental checklist, and found no significant adverse environmental impacts. 0 ITEM "E" 1 • I k I , 1 �i �Ir , �1� 1 I , � 1 I,• 1 •IP I n 1 `t r l I. t ,•,1 i I t d r aril 'Y 1 1 ' '1 1 1 11 r•11 1 i! 1 1/ , 1 1, 1 1 1! I 1' I I r 1•f ' 1 `' II ; 1 �1'i 1' I Y • ' I ,Y 1 1 tr1 1117. 11' ..1 j1 (,1' 1,1 d 1 !' 1 robruary , ,1�,' X11 Page 'r it ,ti� , . 1,'•1 1 ,1 ' 'f1'1' li, .,i � ICI' 1•.I 1 1 1 • r 1 1 .1 r Declaration ' ly ,f •ri ' • Parcel • • 1 • based • review • r r , 'IV, • • significant 1 Y 1 • • • • Y L'1, ri finding �1�k1 „ ,11 •'�' .I 1� r ,11,11 Respectfully submIttedo JACK LAM, Director of k 1 I 1 Y' .r Comnunity Development I�r i1 11 ,t Attachmantst Part •.Y 1� `1 •I lr� Parcel Map rl 'r�,�1 I �• 1 �1�'i Ip d1 `' 1 '•1 , X1''1 ��•1,r 11 r' Y,i 1�� r •1'' 1 11 1 I 1j' 1 , 11 � • r ,1 Y. +: l 1 1 ( t t 1 1 ,i t r 1 • ` \,• \ t;l r : �f ♦ 'rl 1 ..1 `., 1 1l :.Y 1 .� �I + 1 t , •t 1 ,.1 Y 11.• t S' T /If i, 1t, Y.t'. 1 i 2 1 rl'i 11 1'.' C Il' li 11 t , 1 �'11. t S / a t s • '.rr 1 •Y 1 '1 r 1 f 11 1 (� 'I LI'.!LI 1 L 1• it(, % I 1 1 ` Y I C. 1 / h V 1, .:1 i 1 r 1 � � t 1 � 11 '. r J , r�' r Y •1 t � I 4 1 • Y. t • I t r 1 4 1 � r i� 1 yA 1 n � isy t G• I \ t t i.pp 1 Ir: Sr � i t , • ! 1 1 �, 1 r Y 1 1 f r +} I P \ 1 \. Iq 6ol '+'.. 1 4 c ` ! M =) N 1 Its Pill ': /"- -` -mow ♦e a.io •-•.. -� ,A .0 _ J1 13 I !1 CX Y I� Ltl 09011.. ILI -I Imo- ..ry \...'.. ....N1 • ' •��. �\ •4 0 CITY OV 1WCII0 CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY N PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHLET - To be comploLod by applicant Environmental AanonsmonL Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, thin form roust be complaLad and submitLad'to the Development Roviaw Cominitt :acs through the dopnrtmonL• whet,- the project application in made. Upon receipt of ,thin application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial SLUdy. Tho Dovalopmant ReVi0W Committoo will meat and Lnko action no later than tan (10) days before the public meeting at vlhiclh time the project in to be hoard. The Conunittoo will make one of three dotorminntiona: 1) Thu project trill linvo no onvironmonL•al impact and a Negative Declaration will be -fil.ad, 'l) The project will have an dnviro'runontal impact and an Environmental Impact• Report will be prepared, or 3) An addiL•ional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: �-1%O" PMatb 6IAGMWLVb8 :U1510W C�111fL APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS hlnnAlAIGI f _. A7 Dr /�r4dAA 1 HE NE: ITAME, ADDRESS, TELEPi1ONF. OF PERSON TO.DE CONTACTED CONCERNING TIIXS PROJECT: _. LOCATIO�qt OF PROJECT STRF :T A DitESS 11ND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) &-HA '`L<i1/00� }- 1111 m. � (p' . LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATF AND FEDERAL AGENCIrS AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: 1 t F ' q MA66MJ 0 0 O rt= a N w � � C- j i N a b M, f ct: T W/ ill V�i�VVVa ' WHO Igo ICie. W.wn{N� ]unx,irmiuov asn amv-i O'1 {OUI�� 0 I� t C C f,N C I AL-Al IL ID rr M r\ ~ 1- %& killM � '•_ it �Y3 V I i 1 1 .1 N`• .::i w � _ 0 N 4'- Sr ° — �II r 8 s to b e z � � kl Q • 4 i 1 1 .1 1)R0JEC'r Dtg. i11TT9 ff r. DESCRII"rION OF PROJECTt _llobiY, —� �rLlhOf/2irvul� ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND "SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXIS X D PROPOSED DUILDING,� IF ANYt �.�- I�G� -0 � �rJJJ n ev IR &2A0t mtV1%' tt N DESCRIDE T11E -1 NVIRONr1ENrAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAP11Y, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USr, OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND T11E D17SCRIPTION OF ANY . EXIST.11N0 ST_RUCTUX-S AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SIIEETO): is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may an,p whole have significant environmental impact? x- 2 Y ' • r j` 11 J r .. I.t�trr Purnrrc�e: Y, 1:._ 1c „r 1. CruaLo a uubatantinl change in around contours? 2. Create a nubntantinl change in existing noise or vibrntionl 3. Croats a uubntanL•ial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sawaga, A. 4- 5: Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designational, Remove any existing treaal How many?., Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such an toxic substances, flammnblea or oxplosivon? Explanation of any YES answers above: Rhm� • 'IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the xorm on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby cartify that the statemonts furnished above and in the attached exhibits present: the data and i.nformntion required for this initial evnluaL•ion to thn best of my ability, ana that the facts, statements, and informnti.on presented are true and correct to the best of my knowladge and belief. I furthe•c understand that additional information may be requtrod to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made b, y tam e Dvr.lnpment Review Committee. -7 DateD Signature i3 Ti.lo RESOLUTION NO. 80 -O6 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING AMENDMENTS TO Tllr ADOPTED INTERIM LAND USE ELEMENT OF TIIE. RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN TO TIIE CITY COUNCIL WHEREAS. the City has established the second meeting in January, of 1980, as the first General Pion Amendment hearing dots for Planning Commission review; and WHEREAS, comments were heard and considered both pro and con regarding the requested Gnnoral Ilion Amendmonts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Lhnt the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does horoby ro,:ommo.mi that the City Council approve amend - mmllts to the Interim General Plan Land Use Element as follows: SECTION 1: L.."cral Plan Amendment No. 80 -01A - It Is recom- mended i,ia Intorim Land Use Map be amended to show the southeast corner of haven Avenue and Base Line as Neighborhood Commercial (Exhibit "A"). SECTION 2: General Plan Amendment No. 80 -010 - It Is recom- mended that the Intorim Land Use Map of the General Plan be amended to show approximately 20 acres on the northeast corner of haven Avenue and Arrow Route as Neighborhood Community Commarclol with the condition that final approval of the amendment would not be effective until a Conditlunal Use Permit has been granted by the Planning Commission for the site (Exhibit• "D "). SECTION 3: General Plan Amendment No. 80 -OIC - It is recom- menndod that the Interim Land Use Map of the General Plan be amended to relocate the asterisk indicating Alternative Neighborhood Commercial Sites from the west side of Haven Avenue between Highland and Lemon to the intersection of highland and Haven (Exhibit "C "). 1 , SECTION 4: It is recommended that a Negative Declaration be adopted TO r each of the General Plan Amendments No. 80 -0IA, 80 -01C based upon the completion of the'Initial Study and Its findings. t'. APPROVED [,ND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF FEORUARY, 1980. PLANNING, COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Herman Rempcl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Comm ssion I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify thet the fore,oing resolution was duly and ITEM "C" �1� 1 , '�1 I�•t �, � '''�'.1 I,1. 1 L.f'I�I.�b, n1 {I I III 1 -,1 �1, .r11• r 1 I. r 1' I , •Ir planning Coinintsolon of ','t rauularly Introduced, 1 1 1 and adopted 1 t1io C.Ity or Rancho cucomonga at a regular meeting cf the Planning,Coinnifusion 1 A, 1 1900. by tile rot I ow I no vote 1 rl fiat d on tile 13th of rabruary, li tl AYES COMMI SS I , �1 IIOCS COMMI i1; , , !, 111 ll I 1,, ,. rl Id' r� � r,� •O'Ci�'1' �•', 11 Ir II 1 ••`, i11 1 •i f' 1' J•. J ,1 II • /•I 11 1 M '1 1 '1 j r•�1.1 i1•1 r I 1 ' i ' '.�11 •. ' t�ll � 1 1 1. 1111 Il Ijl f 'r 'L l.. .11' ,, , illt .1 11 , I • '1 • I, { t 1 1' 1 1' -`; �� r: (1�•Ih I ' 1 nr,1 F': '1 -, ll'�I rl , I ,/r , 1 , .•,' /'.''ll 1 1 • I I I I 1 l 1 11� L: 1J qj , Iltl f. 1 4. +1 •� 'F^" 11 fl 1 1Y 1 l I '� I. 'i l 1 1, 1 1 11 ,1 I I ,1 1 1 I�i •1Id 1�,11� 11 , 1 .11 'liver, �,� •I, 1; �r'' : �. 11 J ;d I. t ., Illll 1 , I I I I I °fit i 1 Ir •1� • 41 '�'.' :: i II I" •1 I1r. 17 Ii r.'II' �l ,jy�,� I i I� 1 . 1 + 1'- e \ 7 ^ 4 r+ ,...,1 I LI' � L ' '� LI. LI i ► + -! �!: ��r +t 1 C I 1 i � l I� �• n �� f. ,. ,\ It '�JI 1 lyy yell 1 l 1 1 r r.c" t I ' I 1 ,, r _'l� . 1 II r r 1, �br � t, /.. •r A 1 \ r/ 1 1 I 1' } '� I,', ti,, t 'r , •� \, ) u 1, 1.. l , , r � f 1 1 it k ;I r I 1 li �`• I Ir �',1 'I,,i � 1 �I ,',I Ir 1 1 It r , I ry 1 IN ' +1 ill 0 1• 1 • .�• •.w i r i i'� 1• V _ V �i Ir 1 .h, 1 1,1 'Y� •1Y1,`i,�l r1 r'11r r ,. r 1 AIRPOW 1 I_ V� vi cm rrf '� ' t,, r '',�' �1• r ' tl{ 1•r ',i• 111 •� •; 1 1''• ,t11 I , • 1 •1r 1 f • • .•�1 �:. t 1 1 1 110 r A. s ` / t • I + 1 i i 1 r� It • t ISM Ih1 II +1 .'• sf n Ll L , I, y. (_ 'v ? r •, , 1 11 111 11'17 r , / .'.r • , '..l I ' I 1'-• I t..� 1 _1 1 111 '711 {, 1 I +r 7 I H ,i l r '•( I ,' • 1 i , 1 1 r r r 1 r r , ({ I -� � 1 , `.. 1 ( Ilwr 1 r 1 Ir I 11 • r , • s 1 rT,' ' � • � 1 11 7 1 1 I l� 1� Y '1 f ,� ^: y /1 I• • 1 1 I' 1 I • 1 1 '' I� 1 �I 1 �, 1 1 II , •• • 'I • � r � 1 �t � •' • 1 , ti � � h Y . I 1 r r f I •f. , r �, Ir 1 • 1 1 ,. 1 J ( * �r; � 1�.: ';1 .1 I'1�. 1•� r �+ 1 � �•• 7 ,r. r 'y'. i,v r. • `I:' I• 1n^!I 1 1 j1 g r 1 .rr r .., 1 1 '.' i ;: ' i r !1�'f r yt'�i C /.+• • M': :y` 1 r ` 4 '. r `� ?s 1 1 ! 1�• 'y • / I tr L t; . Il.I. _ _..,.:.1.,.. _._..1 � .._ .. _ •IJ 1: .. � . ]L .. IbL�CI ^.•1 .. ,�t.:. � .. __ 1 _. .J r ... _.,. 1, ,f I1 I` ' l71 t I •" t i Ir 11 i II t r '1� , r I ''r AI '11 t+ ,.1'•'11 � 1. 1 'ri I , k 1, I 'I ' 1 a 1 11 r ,� ; 4 \ 1 ! •. r, f 1. 1 1 . , •' ' 1 , 1 1 /, 1 1' r 1 ; , t. r 11 l '! I'j ' i • 1 1•' , 1 . ! I, 1 I r 1r r t !1 rl .alit I , tl, � 1r:wl l i li t, Ir.R. 1 r� "'ill l I 'i� 1 1. f r J rl i' 1 t'� y Y•rl r' 4 r 1•' 'r 11 1j 1,;;1r �'1 ,I'1 ' tj'� i'•`' C, ,1M''1 [ I ll..'rir ;, l 1 Ifl ',i 1 f11 Y'1 1 ", 1�1 i .11' 1 �11 •1 �� '.,, ''.r t' '. 1 'e .1 1;..1 1 v' ,� .r 11 r. I :•Y i'l. <. ., 1, '•, r -r • I,rl Y ,., fl :,! r II �.�I rI Ilk kp "r 1, 1•' tel: r rl ' Ir If' , � III I 1 LOW DFA61TY I 1 1 14C-1 ef MIXUP use LOW k. LoW k. 1 r,l ,. ♦ 114 it Ir'. 1'�r,� •, .�,.., ,•fir 1.�,i, ,c ,,. I �•II, 1 '+' •'If � i + r: • - IY�'�i � + �1 / � 71'1 "� rt; • �.. .��1 fir, tl n' +.1 Y i fir: is rt \fin ;•�; I,n 1.1, ,�t_. 1 l,.i S � ' : r IJ t r � i I ' � t t 1' 1' v\ rl 1 � I . 11 i .1 � ♦ \ rl r la iil , I !� i (1 i a ♦a''1 1 1., 1 'i Y '� , . t..• 11., -,1 ,' 1 r lkd • 1 - I 1 ! la r / , i[ �'1 • ''rr y : +iLb . ♦..,r ti' i `.' i Ir-�. t t lit r•1 f r � i- , k �, � � 1 [ .► t t; , , t 1 � 1 1 • , A I. t • ? • �.i• .- ..- -1 - -�® y'r 1 A 1 S .'�jyl .1� r ' t ♦I: 'i Ha�!� :. (. BLS .,. .. .. 7.' .YL. . _.t. •. �. ., �r r w ® CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rt�� STAFF REPORT Dote: February 25, 1900 �� V Tot Planning Commission From: Jack Lam, Director of Commun;ty Davolopmant -.... __... -- - - -- Request or o- a:ango In zone from R -3 to C -1 for 15.05 acres of land located on the cost side of H, .j -n ny..»_... 1.otween Highland Avcnuo and Lemon 4vanue o:•' 'Zommorclal Properties, Inc., is requesting o zone change Ipso Family Residential) to C -I (Neighborhood Shopping - and acres of land lo;atod on the oast side of Haven Avenue betwoen Lemon and Highland Avenue (Exhibit "A"). The applicants' inten- tion Is to eventpially develop a neighborhood commercial shopping center at ® this location. A preliminary concept plan has been drawn for the site and Is attached as Exhibit "D ". The first phnse of the center would be N developed to the north cnJ since the potential for the fre a ny stil l on the south and of the property. This review onto IIs only z; %s rev le the zone change and !ts consistency with the General Plan and not the specific site plan which will be b:- ouyl:t before the Planning Comniasion at a later date. Tnc preliminary plan Is provided for your Informotlon only and does not constitute the final design of the center. ANALYSIS: The subject site Is suitable for uses permitted in the proposed zone -in terms of access, size, and shape. A commercial shopping center at this location can be developed in the manner to be compatible with existing and planned residential uses, since there is an abundnnee of vaeaht undeveloped land, in which to create appropri.ce design and buffer tech- niques. Exhibit "C" displays the existing zoning rn subject site and adjacent properties as well as the General Plan designation for the area. As can be seen from the exhibit, the base General Plan designation for the site is Mixed Use with an alternate Neighborhood Commercial Center being pro- posed at this location. Surrounding zoning is comprised of various residential zones and a corresponding C -1 zone on the southwest corner of Lemon and Haven. The project site is presen.ly vacant and a majority of adjacent property is vacant with the c =.option of a rddldential neighbor- hood to the north across Lemon Avenue and a multiple family apartment to the west across Haven Avenue. As the Commission will recall, a General P:an Amendment was granted to this area in whi;.h the Mixed Use designation was shown all the way to ITEM "G', ,1 ,,, 1 11 r 1 Il 1 )) „ r l• ,l 1 1 Ir 1',r II "' 1� 1 '17 1 '� I� 1 ,'� �1 • II' 1 'I 1 '1'1 ll • 11'11 ' 1 1 I' I k ' �, r , r 1 1 1 r ., 1 �',1�111,1 L•1 n 1 1�� rl r y �,�11 rlr � I ! 1', i 1 i 1 I " 1 Ir 1 '�' '' I II � 1 i' i 1 I � 1 1 1 t• I 1 r � .I ,' � '( �� 1 ' 1 U. 1 1 ,' � 1� ' 1, •' ' 1 �., � 1 11 �1i Ir '.11 1 1 II , ,I r .,1 u ,1 ,,� it 1 �I Ir r'1� 1 ' •Y1 1� 1�11 11. ♦. 1/ I, �J, I 11'1 �1 �� „r , % 1 1 �•: , 1 f 1' 1'' 1 1 j l� " 1 II 1 �1. 1 I 1,. r � I y r� 1 I .., ( • I,. r 1, ' I' 1 A l 1 i ' I �( ' 1 , Y r" �' 1 J I . 1 1 '1 r • I, I l' I , I 1 1• 1 1 1 II'.�i1 d,�ll 11 I, r � I1�1 1. 1. Iw i, �11 'r I 1 • �• 1 1 '1 1 rl S 10 jowl we '1'��r � 11 r.C•Lr M� I� ;4 I 1 IJ fr It lee I ' 1 11, t • �� a 1. I p •, u 'Z i�� 11 ULU ass r • ', • I�r� 1 � 1 + i I 1 " I I , r''' iii r�i� • 1 1 � 'I-•�rl Ir� 11 ;Z � L1 F I mesa � �•° ` r i A e 1 d 1.'• ,r ,li'' i � •n •I. 1 y 1 I', irr . � I •1 � r��; 1 I,( 1 11r. i , 1 S , �• ' • i. 1 r L `1 t • 1 ' .' Il � 11 1n � 1 • r, 1 1 )r Y" ' r t IG 1e'i r 1 1` • •1• be ti y T 1 11 i l O J; O1�• 11 •1 �� 4 • i I y 1 1 • , Ot 1 i 1 . . � I •1 � r��; 1 I,( 1 11r. i , 1 S , �• ' • i. 1 r L `1 t • 1 ' .' Il � 11 1n � 1 • r, 1 1 )r Y" �� 4 • i I y 1 1� 1 i . Negative Declaration and Zone Change No. 00 -02 February 25, 1900 Pago 2_. Lemon Aver,uo. At that time, CCBRis ware recorded to restrict vehicular access to Lemon Avenue from any conmorcinl development on this site. This was done to insure that land use compatibility will be easier to create. Recant action by the PlanisIng Commission recommended an amond- mont to the General Plan to relocate the asterisk shown on this site to the Intersection of Highland and Ilavnn. The amendment ties not boon ro�lawed by the City Council; therof ,ro, It is not yet approved. In any case, the request for the zone change would still be In conformance with the existing General Plan and proposed amendment. After issuance of per- mits for the center, the General Plan will be amended to reflect tho area as a neighborhood shopping facility. ! t mended that_tt"one —, chan o. be-- ranted fgr a o�rlod ono oar to allow construction of the con or to 60 r; wTthiythat_t11Ra,P9 J. -- the- centaTloas not`iStsT6i+n, bui-iding po rniits-f&" the construction of the cantor within the one -year period, then .the p_ro�art shall revert back to Its original zone and the �. ;are ,nn�lll-noa ba_aurcrno This method will insure that the City cflias not lock in any one cornor at an Intersection whore the General Plan Indicates alternate center locations. If a developer does not intend to develop the site In the near future, then zoning should not be committed. The applicant does Intend to sdbmit plans for the cantor after the councl has reviewed the zone change. Part 1 of the Initial Study Is attnelied for your review. Staff has com- pleted Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted r field Investigation and has found no significant adverse Impacts on the unvironmant as a result of this zone change. Therefore, It is recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued for this project. RECOMMENDATION: It Is r.- ommonded that the Planning Commission adapt Roso;rtion No. 80 -05 which recommends approval of Zone Change No. 80 -02 and issv ice if a Negative Declaration to the City Council. ReIpectfully submitted, � lam.- JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:Mll:kds Attachments: Exhibit "A" Location Map Exhibit "D" Preliminary Site Plan Exhibit "C" Zoning and General Plan Part I Initial Study Resolution No. 80 -05 AWL dY A NI n G —r -I . gCAjjbrr ` {b' mwwmmN y rL44 �7vvg; vr'� T �r1^teruN. Prof! INC. "'r -I'm'o oMV+'Ply„ wrn• �en'a�. a�.l lbrw'� 'Mum '� • :,.4on.� V.J� •eclat rr. wu�r .....y e 0 0 LOW 0000 004 ..Sv VOW. %k AAH IT 1 11 I LOW MY [Exi 6TO t III ®R it I rA CITY OF HANC110 CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMA'T'ION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Asnonamont Review Foot $70.00 For all projects requiring nnvironmontal review, this form must be completed and aubmittod•to the Dovelopment Review Cemnlittoe through the department where tiio project application in made. Upon rocnipt of ,thin application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of t2&a Initial Study', The Development 11avlow Committea will moat and Lake action no later than ton (10) dnys before the public mooting at which Limo the Project is to be heard. The Cenmiittoo will ma)co one of three detorminntiona: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Doclaratlon will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: None as yot. APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Watt Conunaraial Pronorticn, rno, .,2716 Ocean Park Doulovard 0 0 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO HE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: �Il_ Grnf h nn17 _ h•l renter e�Y a� �„ n aria t; _Watt Commercial Proper tias Teo 271 Ocnnn Pnrk Doulovard, Santa Monica, CA 50405 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) tleven A n +0 f+ w m amen and Nichlond 201 -271- 4 & 21 - LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATr AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: T-1 9 r� CITY OF HANC110 CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMA'T'ION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Asnonamont Review Foot $70.00 For all projects requiring nnvironmontal review, this form must be completed and aubmittod•to the Dovelopment Review Cemnlittoe through the department where tiio project application in made. Upon rocnipt of ,thin application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of t2&a Initial Study', The Development 11avlow Committea will moat and Lake action no later than ton (10) dnys before the public mooting at which Limo the Project is to be heard. The Cenmiittoo will ma)co one of three detorminntiona: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Doclaratlon will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: None as yot. APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Watt Conunaraial Pronorticn, rno, .,2716 Ocean Park Doulovard 0 0 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO HE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: �Il_ Grnf h nn17 _ h•l renter e�Y a� �„ n aria t; _Watt Commercial Proper tias Teo 271 Ocnnn Pnrk Doulovard, Santa Monica, CA 50405 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) tleven A n +0 f+ w m amen and Nichlond 201 -271- 4 & 21 - LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATr AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: T-1 9 • l 11 VI(Oarc'r I)I :SCIIIP'PION_ DESMIMON OF PROJECTS Cnoloned plot piano which outline the ILanlo con 1 are prol cot. ACREAGE OF 11110JECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, Ir AM 5,0r not unooble acron - 0ao Plot pinn for building information. Di SCRIBE TIIE -rNVIRONAIEN'rAI, EI.T'I1ING Or THE PROJECT SI'Z'E INCLUDING INFOMINTION ON TOPOGRAPHY,. PLANTS (TREES) , ANVIAhS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE 7F ZURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY , EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)e _ . _ 4n}'nnrntnA n1innoinc cnnter with the uoes. V is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions', which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? vn are in the negotiating ntagoo for the acquisition of the balance of the Sylvester property consisting of approximately 60 a d t ona acres. We are not presently pursuing a development plan property u anticipate that it will be a towr.home type development with possible other uses as wall. x -2 0 , • tom' .,T.. '1'liTti PIln7i ?C'1': VLSI x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Crests a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? ,x 3. Create n subnt'antial change in riumnnd for municipal services (poll -cc, firs, water, nowago, etc.)" 4. Create changes in the oxisting zoning or general plan douignational, chnngo of zona. X 5: Remove any existing trooai , Flow many? lot x G. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such an toxic aubstancou, flaitunablon or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: _'rho proparty is Rronantly zonad R -3. However, tl:o proporty is gonotn ulanned noiahborhood connnorcipl. t4�, PORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that: the fact,, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that nC•: ional information may be required to be aubmieted bei• :e an adcquaLc evaulation can be made by the Dev:-loprivnt Review Committee. bate ?` Signatures Title RESOLUTION NO, 00 -01 A RESOLUTION OF TIIE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RSCOM�(HNDING APPROVAL OP ZONING ORDINANCE AML'NDMENT NO. 80 -01 AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY ADDING SUCTION 61.0224. WHEREAS, on the 25th day of Pobruary 1980, the Planning Commisnion hold a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65054 of the California Government Code. SECTION It Tito Rancho Cucamonga Planning Cosmninsion lion made the following flndingat 1. That such amunduiont 10 in conformance with the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. That such amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. 3. That such amendment will not ' t detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. 4. That the proposed amendment would not have signi- ficant adverse envrionmental impacts. SECTION 2t The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commiosion lion found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and Iron recommended iseuanco of a Negative Declaration on February 25, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED; 1. That pursuant to Section 64854 to 65847 of the Cali - fornin Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of February, 1980. of Zoning a Ordinance Amendment No. 80 -01. 2. Tito Planning Commission hereby rocommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Ordinance Amend - mant which adds Section 61.0224, 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolntion and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. 4. That the attached amended Sections of the Zoning Ordinance becomes a part of '.tis Resolution. LJ { 0 0 1� � \ ` �- ORDINANCE NO. /.� AN ORDINANCE or 'fllE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCIIO, - CUCAMONGA, CALiroRnIA, AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE BY APARTMENTS ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONVERSION �6,) OF APARTMENTS TO CONDOMINIUMS, 7 Tho City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain (a•f6 owW. f SECTION is PURPOSES: —! A. The City Council finds and determines that 40 eonvorsions`of apartments to community apartments, stock cooperatives and condominiums affect the public health, safety, and welfare; and that such p,._ -ts, which are subject to the subdivision regulations of the State of California, simu H be regulated Sy local ordinance. The City Council determines a need to regulate the conversions of existing buildings to community apartments, stock cooperatives and condominiums so as toi 1. Encourage a balanced supply of rental and ownership housing In the community and a vi,ricty of choices of tenure, type, price, and local,lon of housing. 'L. Maintain and encoUrago ths, supply of affordable housing, both ownershir and rental, for low -end- moderate Income peravns and families; and 3. Promote the residential stability and quality of the community by developing neighborhood identit-, discouraging displacement of residents, and faelll- toting affordable home ownership opportunities and rental ownership opportunities fur the community. 'a r The City Council, thoraforo, states Its express Intent to not such stnridards and regulations necessary to Insure that npartmmnts and like structures being converted will be In the best Interest of the com- munity. SECTION 2: DEFINITIONS The words and terms used In this Chapter shall have tl:e following rneanlnti unless the context clearly indicates o thorwisa: A. Apmrtment: (Conmunity) Apartment as defined in Section 11004 of the Business and Professions Codo, containing two or more rights of exclusive occupancy. B. Condominlums: Condominiums as defined in Section 1350 of the Civil Codes "An estate of real property consisting of an undivided interest In common areas, together with a separate right of ownershli in space." C. Conversion: The process or act of subdivision, to a- .cordence with the cubdivlsion Map Act, of existing rental dwelling units. D. Low to Moderate Housing: Housing that is available to persons with income of 8 202 of the County median. 11 1 L7J E. Post Report: An Inspection and written report conforming to the requirements of Section 0516 of the Business and Profess tons Code of the state of Cal Ifornla Including documentation of condltions ordinn'ily rubject to attach by wood destroying posts and organisms. r. Project : Project moans a condominium, commun,c/ apart- ment, and stock cooperative. G. Stock Cooperative: Stock Cooperative as defined In Section 11003.2 of the Dusinoss and Professions Cadet Property consisting of dwelling units owned by a cor- poration whereby the tenants are the shareholders of the corporation. SECTION 3: PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS In order for an application for the conversion of apartment units to community apartments, condominiums and stock cooperatives to be considered, the applicant must submit an application for Conditional Use Permit and Tentntive Tract Map. The following special and general requirements must be met or accompany the Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map application in addition to those requirements of a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Map. A. Special Requiremenra: The applicant shall provide spee:tfle Information concerning economic and demographic characteristics of the projeel, including,' but not limited to the followings 1. projected percentage of existing tonants necessary In ardor to make the conversion project feasiulo. 2. estimated market value of osch unit; 3. terms of proposed assistance, discount, or other financing program to be offered, If any, to prouent residents for the purpose of subsequent unit purchase; 11. proposed program of relocation assistance to be offered by the applicant, If any; 5. written proof that each tenant is advised of the Intention of ti.e applicant to subdivide the existing apartment complex Into cone,)minium units at least 120 days In advance of the doto of the approval of the Final Tract Map. If within 120 ddys a change in occupancy occurs res.ilting to the presence of a tenant who has not received th- 120 dny notice,, the iytJ`- JL-. --- applicant shall Tile with tho Planning pa•rtm t an agreement signed by that tenant that he waives the 120 day notice requirement. Alternately the Planning Department may reschedule the hearing on the Final Tract Map until 120 days has elapsed from the date of proof of service of the notice on the tenant of intent to subdivide. El G. A reoort of field toot by u qualified Independent testing agency as specified in the Uniform tlullding Code showing that the wall separation and the floor and coiling seporatlon between units sholl provide the some airborne sound Insulation as required by the most current Uniform Building Coda requiremonts adopted by the City. If the repurt shows that those standards are not met than the applicant sholl Indicate that he will complota Improvements necessary to moot those requirements wlthln` such time as . ✓ 146 �— recommandud by the Planning p.n mp t At the time of the Conditional Use Permit /Tentative Tract hearing, the applicant may request a tjolver by the Planning Commission of all or some of the Improvements whore � V practical difficulties are shown to exist. No occupancy of a condominium for ntherrtthan an existing enant wl11 be allowed —urttTT C0 .un p� rrooT stand s 7. are mot. In cases whore units are occupied by tenants, who have Initiated o contract For the purchase of the units, the improvements for such soundproofing shall be complete prior to occupancy of the unoccupied units. !i report by City building official detailing the structural condition of each building and structure upon the property, with specific reference to the extent to which any condition exleting in any struc- tura As unsola or dangerous. The report shall also Include analysis of all structu�os by o licensed structural post control operation, relating to the presence or absenco of wood- destroying pests or organisms. B. A copy of the proposed declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictidns which will apply and which shall include an agreement for oimmon area maintenance, including facilities and landscaping, together with an estimate of the Initial assobsment fees anticipated for such maintenance; a description of provision for maintenance of vehicular occess areas within the project; and an indication of appropriate responsibilities for maintenance of all utility lines and services for each unit. 9. Other information which, IPon1 fi n„ opinion the Director of Community J O %luassts in .- .� determining whether the proposed project is con- sistent with this chapter. B. General Requirements: Each project proposed for condo- minium conversion shall meet the following standards: 1. Each habitable unit sisall conform to current noise and energy insulation standards required by the rf, y I 11 All; tl t t 1; S �h e latest adopted applicable law I rrIn,,,dard", woul ion may Uniform Building Code or other or regulation. Whore meeting those cause excess vo costs, the Planning consider a waiver of this require- 2. cacti unit shall have installed smoke detectors as 3. 4. 5. 6. required by the latest adopted edition of the Uniform Building Code. for each unit there shall be provided a minimum of two covered, on -site parking spaces per unit in a garage or carport, finless waived by the Nonni ommisslon plus 20$ of the total spaces provided for guest parking. each dwelling unit shall be separately metered for gas, electricity and water unless the City approves a plan for equitable sharing of communal metering. each unit shall be provided with separate water shut -off valves or separate shut -off valves for individual fixtures. each area for trash placement and pickup shall be adequately designated and all refuse shall be removed on a regularly scheduled basis from the premisas. 7. pormanant mechanical equipment which the Building Official determines Is a potential source of vibra- tion or noise shall be shock mounted or Isolated, or otherwise mounted In a manner approved by the Building Official to lesson the transi,•Isslon of vibration and noise. 8. illuminated addresses, and If found necessary by the City, directory maps, for all units shall be promi- nently displayed from appropriate public or private access within or adjacent to the project. 9. where the Planning Commission finds that'I 1 feast ,.at least 125 cubic feet of enclosed, weatherproof, lockable storage space is to be provided for each unit. fh!s storage space shall be In addition to that ordinarily contained within each unit. It may be either within or exterior to, but shall bear a reasonable locatlonal relationship to each unit. SECTION 4: TENTATIVE REQUIREMENTS: The applicant shall provide the City with a tentative subdivision map in c4-1^ conrormrinco with the Stat� ap Act and local ordlnacc Including, but not limited tot k SECTION 5: 1, dimensions and location of each building and unit; 2. location of common area and amenities existing or proposedl 3. location and dimensions of parking garage, carport, parking area, accaas -ways, and any other on -site area rasorvcd for vehicular usal It. areas for exterior storage space for indivl•'ual 4 u pants; $) A andscape plan per City standards which specifics trees, shrubs, plants, and ground cover, and Indicates existing landscape massing. Species, quantity, and sizes shall be indicated for proposed landscaping only. 6. Typical floor plans of existing units. CONVERSION '.IMIT PROCEDURE A. Annual Limit. The City shall approve no more than one - half the number of multi- family rental dwellings added to the City's housing stock (i.e. dwelling units completed and ready for occupancy) during the preceding year, In �. any gne'cnlondar yuor. Tho.numhor of multl-ftImlly ron,tol units added In one year shall be determined as foilows: from January I through December 31, the total number of multi - family rental units given a final building In- spection and occupancy permit minus the number of such units demolished, removed from the rity, or convortud to non - residential use. ho Py nn ssion a rov prof ct for more / f i n t o o bblo itl faml unite In arty o�oor f (� th fl+ at o nu or dwolli��n nit ,s no mor i hen 3 gre i,r the tb a tabLKhe location for at E If an apprwad project expires prior to recordation of the Finai Tract Map the allocated dwelling units shall be added 1'o the present years' allocation. For a one -time only basis, this ordinance shall establish the 1979 multl-fomlly rental dwelling unit number at 250 dwelling units. D. Time Limit. Any multi - family rental unit constructed after the effective date of this ordinance shall be allowed to convert to condominiums subject to the provisions ION r L I'll of this ordinance, five yoalta ran the date of the final occupancy of the project. SECTION 6: ACTION BY PLANNING C014MISSION A. The Lity shall make the following findings In addition to the findings required for a Conditional Use Permit and Tentative Tract Maps in order to approve an applicat'on to convert apartments to condominiums: 1. the proposal is compatible with the objectives, Policies, elements and programs specified In the General Plan and any applicable spoclfic plan. 2. the design or improvement of the project is con- sistent with applicable, general and specific plans. 3. the proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter. 4. the proposal promotes with the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City. The action of the Planning Commission is final unless appealled in writing to the City Council within fifteen (15) calendar days. M SECTION The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clark shall attest to the some, and the City Clark shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days of ter Its possago, at least onto In The Da_ ily Report, a news- paper of general circulation published In the City of Ontario, California, and circulated In the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. L' J ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of , 1900. AYES: NOES: ABSENT Lauren B. Wasserman, City Clerk 1�1 ICJ James C. Frost, Mayor 2 ■1 STAFF REPORT DATE: Februnry 25, 1900 TO: Planning Commission FROM: JACK LAM, Director of Community Development SUBJECT: REQUEST BY HENRY RtITRR FOR THE USE OF FLAGS FOR AN INDUSTRIAL LEASING OFFICE LOCA'TE'D ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW AND ARCHIBALD. ABSTRACT: Attached, please find a copy of Mr. Reiter's letter of request to the Planning Commission. Basically, lie is requesting that 1:o he allowed to locate flags on his facility in order to attrnct potential lessees. In the past, it lion been the Commissions' direction to staff to prohibit all kinds of flags for leasing purposes on developments; industrial, commercial and residential. If the Commission were to consider approval of Mr. Reiter's request for flags on his facility, this would encourage otter developers to make similar requests. If the Planning Comminsion's position has changed and you desire to permit flags for leasing purposes, the Planning Commission may wish to reconbider their entire ® policy on flags for industrial, commercial and residential. It_ip ntnffs' o,inion that flags do nothing to attract potential lessees to n . site, but the contrary :o ten o me A r a c r.c� us j �tl:an anyt ing else.._ o do not see the need for any flags on any development ` induat:•ia�co:mnercinl or residential and recommend that the Commission deny the applicants' request. RECOWIENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission deny Mr. Reiter's request for flags on his development thus reenforcing previous Commission policy. Reap ctfully sibmitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:BKtt:cd Attachments: Letter— Henry Reiter ITEM "J" A.M. REITER DEVELOPMENT rabrunry 1, 1900 Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga P, O. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: P'lags or Banners Gentlemen: 01 Y I01: VANCHO UGA6 ONGA C011111UNRY I? WOPUIVIT Derr. re Lt,I 1!)00 AM Phi 71819110111112111213141510 A I have currently completed the constru Cucamonga Business Park located at the corner of Arrow and Archibald. At the approximately 358 leased. Ilowever, in the overhead costs and debt service, a leased is required. e Lion phase of Southwest moment we are order to pay figure of 058 I believe I have succeeded in building the most attractive business park in San Bernardino County. Through the demands Of the Planning Department and my own standards, I have spent a great deal of money cn architecture, landscaping, and ex- terior .lighting. However, we find ourselves with an advertising problem. lie have advertised in all of the local papers and the Los Angeles Tines for weeks. (Attached are some of the bills reflecting these costs) We have cold - called on hundreds of businesses and wo Have sent thousands of mailers as well as hand delivered flyers throughout the area. Each of these standard methods have proven to be of little or more to the Pointe no value in leasing of this project or any other of my projects. We have found that the business people who prefer the San Bernardino area seem to be different from the people who are in t11e metropolitan areas of Los Angeles County and Orange County in that they prefer to do the leasing research for themselves by getting out and thoroughly canvassing the area. Therefore, we feel that the flags that we propose are necessary in order to bring attention to our project to help L•o P.O. Box 7250 . Newport Beach, CA 91663 3188 Pullman • Costa Mesa, California 92626 • 714 / 751.4594 u 0 Pago 2 Planning Commission mako them aware of the advantatoo of our location as wall as the attractiveness of Cucamonga Business Park. I feel that what the Planning Commission in trying to accomplish on signing and flags is somewhat justified; howovor, there should be circumstances similar to ours, where there is a period of time, say four to six months, that flags or banners used in an appropriate mannor to advertise are worthwhile. I would appreciate your thoughts and comments. Sinceroly, A. H.!IiCITER DPV LOPMCNT COMPANY X . Reiter, III r Y F1 i '. STAFF REPORT DATE: February 25. 1450 T0: Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lnm, Director o: Community Davulopment SUBJECT: CHAFFEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT REQUEST FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNING TO THE VOCATIONAL SKILL CENTER ON PERON STREET IN CUCAMONGA. ABSTRACT: Attachad, please find a letter from the Chaffey Community College District requesting directional signing to their facility on Peron Street. Tito directional signing is almost identical to that signing presently used for residential developers w -kthin Rancho Cucamonga. It is our opinion that a program of providing maps to new students for the Peron location would be oubotantially better than providing kiosks through- out tl:e City to direct traffic to the facility. One of the printery reasons tl:e facility was approved at that location was because of its remoteness. It was felt that it was more appropriately located in this area than would be at the Chaffey Community College site on Haven Avenue or other areas with- in the City. If the Commission were to entertain rp roNal of this sign progra it would direct not only students from the o ege it 3cZu to :� 'tTe : ty; Tt- -ia�ropinion that the program is not necessary and 'Jill not so va ie a i rt term problem the t the Community College District is experiencing presently. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the planning Commission deny the Community College District's request. Re pectfully submitted, ..mope JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL: 60: cd AML Attachment: Letter; Chaffey Community College District ITEM "K" COMMUNITY DISTRICT Rancho Cucemong11 Planning Commission Rancho Cucamonga City 111111 9320 OasoLino ]toad Alta Loma, California 91701 11000 HAVEN AVENUE, ALTA LOMA, CALIranNIA 91701 TELEPNDNEi (714) 987.1737, 022.4404, 735.020 charroy Collage Vocationnl Skills Cantor 9375 Foron Street Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 'telephone: (714) 907 -2735 Fabruary O, 1900 Attention to: Mr, Rompol and Mombors of the Commission Door Mr. Rampol: t: V `v 1s 69 cotb Uri l7 Y 0! 1'L(.CI'; ?Cll r wr. i :i :-b 1..1 1�lo AM rat ` "li'i1�110)11(1?11(�j�1�luIG r: An you know, Chaffay College has opened a new facility in Rancho Cucamonga at 9375 Foron Street. This in an industrial complex site housing various industrial -shop classes and business education classes for Chaffoy Collage. An members of the Chaffay College district we, are hoping that this now tnatellital enmpue will help meet the needs of our community by offering accesoiblot low -coot instruction to ,students interested in a wide variety of vocational training programs. Unfortunately, duo to the newness of our location and its lack of visibil- ity we are plagued by student& calling us to help them find their classed Duo to the fact that there has boon so much recent development in this area, even residents of Cuc_.nonga Alta Loma are not sure where Peron Street is. This is not surprising since up until several months ergot Foron did not exist at the intersection of lie lms, and it is still not a through street. Consequently. thorais much confusion even though we have tried to provide the public with good directions and mapsl I must add that it in not just potential students who are having trouble finding our location. Even staff from the college have called on occasion for help in finding the way to our Cantor. We would like to request that the Planning Commission consider the extenuat- ing circumstances we are facing, in terms of directing students to this location which is indeed 'Toff the beaten track." We would like to ask that we be allowed to place several off -site signs directing students and others to our facility. I understand the Planning Comnioeion has adopted an 'official' off -site sign which states Rancho Cucamonga on tops and lists housing tractor, etc. underneath. We are including a drawing of ® BOARD OF TRUSTEESi 1 Lester Stroh, M.D., President Kemeth.C. Ketner, Vice President An Affirmative Action /Equal Opportunity Employer and District Sharon KIng.Jotfers, Secretary Serving Alto Lemo, Chino, Corona, Cucamonga, Etiwando, James L. Calcuaro. Ph.D. Herschel R. Glenn Fontana, Guasti, Montclair, Mi. Boidy, Superintendent of the District Cleremer Saunders Norco, Ontc•lo and Upland President of the College - 2 - ouch a sign, with tho information we would like announcing Chaffoy College's vocational Skills Center's location, no it would be cloar,tho nign we have envisioned would bn in keeping with Cho Commission's desire to upgrade the aren't; previous proliferation of garish commarcial advar- tining. Our hope in that you will recognize our dilemma, and help us tnitignto it by leaving such signs at: four locations - providing, we can ,:t the appro- val of tho individuals involved. Tha locations would be at 9th and Archibald, Arrow anrt tlalma, 9th and Vinoyard, and 9th and halms. We appreciai:o your consideration in this mattor and auk you to p?anco remember that we are roconmending thano signs on tho basin of what we feel to be our responsibility an a public institution, and a comnnunity resource for Chaffoy Collega's populations many of whom are so new to the area that they aren't yet aware of whore tho main Alta Loma campus is located. KD /bk Sinceraly, Kathleen Drindell, Division Chairperson I {I \ 1.1� 1 11 • %II it '1 111 1 I' 11,• 1 15,E 1. 1 •�'i 1 1 11Ir111 1 if i. (i•�111111 1L 11 a { II Il l 111.1 1 I1 ' 1 1 •� /' I I! r I 1 I I1 11 1 1 . i� (I � 1' I {1t Ir l 1. '� 1 11. 1 I J '1111 �•.'1 1' 1 II' 11 1' Ih II� 1 I1. ( l r .� 1 1 J' 1 I I, 1 I •I.�r { I 11 1. 5 'r l I Ir' J 1 14.1.111 {li 1 )'� h 1{ 1 1� I +�' I I 1.1'� 1 rY �l' '• ( Y '11 n I I 1 11 1 1 1 � 11'1 11 1 1 I 1 l 11 I\ -111.. 1 I 'I'! I n1 I 1 "1.11 1'.I• I r l i 11 11' !1 1,1 1' N 111' il' 1 l i I IIr 1�� 1 1•I,r1 Y'1 ��. !1�� 1� 'I'.0 1. 1 1 � 1�4 f.l, l .II \ -I� ( 11 it 1 1 ; � 1 I • 11 '� 1 I 1 . 11 1 4 1 ' 1 1 I'• 1 1 I' 1111 11 '1 �, {1 •1 •' .l.l f j I i �.1. rill 11 II 1 1 r'i ; ' p.1� 1'jl11 1 '1 1. f11111. /1 11 rl ill 11 1 +1� fA{ /PI 1 'll �� I� 1 ill 1 111',4 j��lll1.1 �\ r I.1 1 I, ry 1n , i i 1 • 1 "5 Ik 1'i 1 14.11' ,1I )•.11 ' , ' h 11 i �' 'l l 11 r �11 .111• "1 �� 4n1� •1 i •. 11 i• ll 4Elli •if�.l4 •. .•li \4. • 11 • 11 • 1n 11- 1 111 !In I 111 •L' 1 �• 111 1. I�'1.11 '•j�' •y.� '11 'i i\ •M� I 1 1 , I% r 1 , CHAFFEY COLLEGE •11 I1. '�''� .ti•I.M,,� � 1j1 1 1 1 � :•1 } 4411 1 1 • 11 •'•1!. VOCATIONAL 11 1 1 I'•1 1 1 1'I `11, fl l•', � li �� h:•: 1�'� I l l q 1 II P•. 1111 Ilk 4N y` ,1 fll.l'l l" 1'1 'x'41 !:i � ••11!1 ll; •. I�'1. 1. l . I •II• I �• 1 1 /1 41 ��` '/ 1' 1 41 �•� ''1•.. ��1'li 1 1.1.1'.1 1.1.1! •I._ • li r, l� I''r ,� •b�1 l , � 1f I' L1; 1 41; 1�• r��1 1 II 11.1 l 3 (•L.. l 1 1 �✓ LI I 4 ► t 7 /ti f .. k 1 r .( ('i ' i:1 k I• 5 � r r p� A C,.! 1 � h 1 1 f 1 '11 1 r� r 1 1 r��fr Ir 1 l.f / r. . 1 '`'I � 1 1 •1 1 1 5 r '' y 1 ( el 1. YI y 1 r 1� 1 fl •1 1•,SII 1 1 1 111 � 1 _ Ir n41 h ,... , 1 b• .. (•. �. 41 � . 1L � n.� l ,�. � ... ... I,..1 v ._ _ .! I r 1 ._ ... 14 `ef iP STAFF REPORT DATgt February 250 1980 TOt Planning Conm:ianion rROHt Jack Lam, Director of Community Development SUDJL'C'i't HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DACKCROUNDt The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding planning area includes large, vacant undeveloped residential parcels located on hillside topog- raphy. Much of this land is located along the northern planning boundary Jinn of the community and is designated on the Interim General Plan as "Hillside". This designation has been recognized in the draft. zoning ordinance as requirS.a!! spoeial development standards. Implementation of n comprchonsivo hillside daveinnmeat ntendard in naeespnry with the occurrence of development in the hillaLlo arena and with any development which may require large amounts of grading that make extennivo changes to the oxinting land contours. The history of grading in many of Cite extating residential vubdivieions within the City have exhibited lack of concern for the environment. Soma situations arising from poor grading practices on hillnidn development include the following: Drainage and erosion problems Poor building location Poor vehicle and pedestrian access Visual eyesoro The Interim General Plan "lii.11side" designation requires development standards to be applied to certain hillside arena. Some hillside standards are act forth in the draft Zoning Ordinance. They include characteristics regarding grading, drainage control, planning bays for aesthetic of the cut and fill slopes. However, to appropriately plan hillside development, it is necessary for the City to consider a more comprehensive approach towards reviewing and approving any development requiring large amounts of grading, or development of steeper hillsides. A comprehensive hillside development strategy for thin city would consider the following in creating'hillside development standards. Compatible contour grading practices Building design and construction atnndards ITEM "L" 1 '1 A MA fA'.I RESOLUTION NO. 80 -105 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 80 -02 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -3 TO C -1 FOR 15.85 ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN BETWEEN LEMON AND HIGHLAND - ASSESSORS PARCLL NO. 201• -271 -4 AND 201 - 271 -21 WHEREAS, on the 25t1: day of' January, 19800 an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of February, 1980, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Comnission has made Ric following findings: 1. That the subject property Is suitable for the uses permitted In the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with extuting land use in the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant Impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the proposed General Plan. SECTION 2: Tile Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse Impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on February 25, 1980. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Goverrment Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of February, 1980, Zone Change No. 80 -02. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 80 -02. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Conanlaslon shell be forwarded to the City Council. SECTIO_N_3 The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission racmmnands M mt th s zone change be„a vud with the condition that building, permits for the alto be l ss d within one year from the final approval of tl:e zone eh ng the zoning�vlll ravert to its original zone. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2ST11 D Y LF.AE#001-�l PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RAN A0UCAMON BY: Herman Rcmpe1, (, airman ATTEST: 0 Socra:arl• o t e P ann ng Comm ss on I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Conmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hold on the 25th day of February, 1980. AYES: COMMISSIONLRS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ryu. a," a7uu Cont, Y Lnndocopo nundardo "\ Protection of sitnificunt existing vegetation �• Drainage and runoff considerations View access from and to the project nitu Roadway design standards Fire protection Open space and development inturfnce Thane features would eompriva the basin of hillside development standards. Consideration of the hillside development standards will coincide wall with tho completion of tho General Plan and Urban Design element of the City. Methodo for Luplomentation of tho Hillside Development standards can be 3 accomplished through amending the coning ordinance, astablinhing specific standards to be employed by the Grading Ordinance and ponuibly creating Residential Design Guidelines. Once complete this information will be brought before the Zoning Ordinance Committee and tho Planning Commission for their review and approval prior. to City Council adoption. Ultimately tiicso approved development standards will be available to the public, in a ` comprehensive information packet, such no the Hillside Development Manuel. RrcomENDATIONt r 1a .nrm�mnnd ^a r� arming Commission direct etaEf to prepare n Maids Davelapmen nl o be considered by the Planning Commission. It is anticip`a•ut 'J that this information will be available for review by the Zoning Ordinance Committee during the first weak of April. The Planning r Commission will review it in their last meeting during April. R apactfull submitted, JACK TAM, Director of Community Development JL:TJB:cd I .'r IL CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT Dotal Fubtvnry 25, 1900 To: 1'lnuning Commission Fromt Jack Lnm, Director of Community Development: Subject: NEGATIVE PECLARAI'IDN AND 51Ta n1•rnuvAL' ,vv. UV-vi - ..v..0 I.,. ASSOCIATES - A request for the development of a shopping center to be located on the southwest corner of Lemon Avenue and haven Avenue EACRGRouwt The npplicnnt is requesting approval for the development of a neighborhood shopping center to be located on approximately 4.5 acres of land located oil the southwest corner of Lemon and Haven Avenue (Exhibit "A "). Tile project will include approximntaly 34,000 square feat of building area. The development will include a 1,770 uquare foot service atntion, a 3,025 square foot restaurant, n 3,000 square foot nursery facility and display area, 19,250 square feet of retail apace, and 6,000 square fact of office area (Exhibit "B "). The office is propooed no a second story over the retail space. The project site is presently zoned C -1, General Planned for a Neigh- borhood Shopping Center, and is presently vacant. Land to the north and east are vacant and land to the northwest, went, and south are developed with resi- dential uses. ANALYSIS: Tile project site as shown on the development plan is adequate is size, shape, and access to nccommodate the proposed uses. The uses an proposed on the development plan are permitted within the zone subject to Planning Com- miboion review and approval. The project is proposed to be developed in phases if financing in not available to develop the entire project at one time. Exhibit "C" shows the phasing plan which denotes the nursery, service station, and res- taurant an Phone I, the single store retail space as Phase II, and the addition of the offices over the retail space and tht! final stage of the nursery an Phase M. Phase I development will provide all street improvements, driveways, and land- scaping adjacent to street frontages. Access to the site in provided by one driveway from Haven Avenue and three driveways from Lemon Avenue. Haven Avenue in designated an a major divided highway and Lemon in designated an a collector Street. The existing median in Haven Avenue will be upgraded to City standards and landscaped. In addition, a signal is required to be provided at the corner of Lemon and Haven Avenues. The project is proposing to install 6' concrete block walls along the entire west and south property lines. Those walls will be 6' measured from the highest point of grade at the location of the wall. In addition, it is recommended that dense I'm "R" Site Appm;uval No. 00 -01 Februnry 25, 1980 Pago 2 landscaping be provided along the went mad nouth property. linen. Tho retail building for the nursery fnnility in locnted 115' from the went property linn which abuts n ningle fatally residential develolmnent. Tito single story retell building in lucnted 10' from the south property lino nud the nonreot condominium units south of the project nro an ndditionsl 70' tawny. The two story portion of the building will be located SO' from the south property lino plus 90' from the nonreot condominium. If the project In phnned as shown on the planning plan, then it in recommanded that the building pads be temporarily turfed and irrigated until such time that they arc built upon. In addition, it is recumunended that 20X of the trees to be planted on the site be of spucimnn size ospociatlly along 1(nven Avenue which in designated no a Special Boulevard, that mounding be plateau whatever possible, and that hedge work be planted on haven Avenue in front of the drive -thru facility of the restaurant. Exhibits I'D% "L "' and "P" display the exterior building elevations of the retnil stores, nursery, and portions of the gas station and restaurant. Tito design proponas to use flat gray concrete roof tile, stucco columns and aides, and wood trellis' in the nursery ores. Colored delineations and a material sample board will be available at the Planning Commission meeting. Prior to the Planning Commission meeting, these are available for review in the Planning Division Office. Exhibits "C" and "IC' digpiny the exterior building elevations of the service sta- tion which indicate the use of the name gray flat concrete the roof, white stucco, a white painted metal eavo, and an shown on the southeast aide elevation, painted metal panels between reatroom doors. The Design Review Comnittee met to review the service .tation design and felt that there was a used for the use of more wood, textures, and colors. Time issue of more wood on the service station wan discussed with both the owner /devr_loper and the architect. Ilowever, revised plann indicate that no wood is proposed and instead the architect is proponing punch out columns or corner projections at the corners of the service station. The effect of projecting the corners is desirable; however, the use of wood for the facia and portions of the side of the building are still desirable based upon the comments made by the Design Review Committee. Therefore, it is recommended that revised elevations be done in accordance with the comments of the Design Review Committee and that such plans be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permits for this site. Complete building elevations were not proposed for the restaurant at this time simply because a tenant has not been decided upon. Therefore, it is recommended that only conceptual pits plan approval be granted for the restaurant pad and that final Director Review be completed prior to issuance of building permits for that building. Patt I of the Initial Study is attached for your review. Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, has been completed by Staff and at field investigation conducted. After completion of the Initial Study and field inves- tigation, no significant adverse impacts on the environment were found as a result of this project. Therefore, it in recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued for this project. Situ Approval No. 00 -01 February 29, 1900 Page 3 C01MRSPONDENCRt Thin item has been advertised in the Daily Report lognl ad suction for a public hearing before the Planning Commisnion for thin date. In addition, notices of thin meeting worn sent to property ownuto within 300' of the subject property. In responso to the noticen vent to the adjacent property ownere, correspondence was received from the Garden Apartmont Homeowners Annociation which in located nouth and adjacent to the project Oita. An can be Bean from the contents of the letter (which in attached for your review), the Homeowner's Annociation in opposed to several napeetn to the development of the vita. Staff han tried to deal with the concernn pointed out in thin letter by requiring a wall denianed service nta- tion, prohibiting left hand turnu from Haven Avenue into the station by uae of a raised nwdian inland, requiring a oignifiennt building setback for the two story portion of the building, and by locating the drive through window of ttse restaurant away from tlse soutls property line. It in highly suggested that the Cosnnission visit the project site and take note of the location of the existing condanLn ium units and the existing vita conditions relative to the present landscaping in the area. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that 'Ise Planning Comminsion approve Site Approval No. 8U -01 and issue a Negative D iclaration !-y adopting tlsa attached Resolution No. 80 -07 based upon the findings and conditions listed therein. Respectfully a bmittted, 1 JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:MV:nm Attnclurents: Exhibit "A ", Exhibit "B ", Exhibit "C", Exhibits "D" stores, Exhibits "G" Site Plan Vicinity Map Phasing Plan - "P", Exterior Building Elevations of retail nursery and portions of the gas station b restaurant =41", Exter).or Building Elevations of the service station Part I, Initial Study Letter from Carden Apartments Homeowners Association dated 2/2/80 Resolution No. 80 -07 �, ha ', t If ' 'it I . I;, ' I,•i If ^ � 1. !,11 f '' L I i'� 1 .f: 1 I 1 ` 1 l•I 1 ,. I I ... • I,,,., i I II ''l l �..� 11 I 1 I' �/ I 1 I. 11' i I� ''l l ill 1^ � •, r '''ll � rl� � f •'' ( 1 1. 4 !I ,. 1 1 ', I I' � , 1 . I 'r I,I�I l I I .I Y rlr " t , I I I 1 1 I 1 l.'♦ Y I� k k r III 17, I d'^ II I �1 r 11 'I , I t',I ' ♦ � " f'>, 1 ', , 1 ; •� ' /y/ ' ! III' 11 I �� ' I' I r I,' I f I I I� , f • 1 '.I 1 'I I I 1 � !f' i �1 dr ( III. .f t'. 1 ,'I I , �! { I 1 1�' ! ur• i I I•� l) �' 11 i al f , f ` r � I I I ��I 1' �r �' I �1��1 1 11 , .I I' J 1! 1 S t Y I� • i. I 1rl) /11 „I 1 1 � � I� 1 I 1 i. �r 11, ,y t I''r'.I ..IYh � '.�•'I, 44 1•ll. Ip �r M•, 1 f r , � � 41 ♦ y w;. ! " r "• ,. 9 t 11 I1 �1 "°i',a f? I:l'`r7 ' f� r ♦�' r LI'rl 1'r ♦ Lf li' 1 L w. I i. � J 11 L I k I , 1 4 ' f .1+ ^ . ♦.!,•1 Ir y _.'(;, 1 r' 1 " . ; 1.1 � I � •• J � � " ^ � ' ' I Y y l � 1 a ^ f al t � f l I, p� y 1 •�� { J 1 U i I, k { ti� f ( ( 1 •1'' JE '� ' v f , lo 1 �� • �., ''', r II ' 1''.. • I ' ' '.III 1 �, I. �,'I } ',I '�,'�. it I I 1 '�• Ilr ;I' /.I �rrl .. �1 I II, I,. , �i! I'.�r I) III r .l�♦ III 11,1 111 IIIn r1 I , 1 •. 11(,•1, 'I ller� ', 1j r..� 1 � , /. � 1 r•I, �l. ! I � .1j� , '''•' i'' 1' I II + � I ` '�; ` r, '� I i 1, ' ' I ', I V I, � I ( • ''' ' 1, ' r 11 I r �, � I I I 1 I . I r � '4, r 1` , � • I 1' 1 1 1 , I . I} • I I , /, 4 ,' I I` 1 , . it , , ..i I , ', '1 I �, , I '.r i , . II Ir / I • �'r t r� r r 1111 11 y I i•f ,.•1. ; 11, 1 ,,l .,� r ,r . I.. �'� .'y 1 �' 1`, � / '�•d , �' Its /tl` \11 r GAIL , + ��,'.r'�� I I 1 �. r' �• Y 1 I'. r, 1 r 1 1 1 I (, f ,i 1 �,�. ' ri i ' Its. � ' 1 • I I + f I 1 w �;. i r..•► � 1 '. I� , ( II Y, t •�.1,1 7 'r '•i v' P " r ' 1 . y 1 j . •11',ILI zl I - L I • �. I 1 7 �' ` 111 ' � � . '1 �•'1 , I 'I'• 1 f'1 • r ) 1 `� + '� 1.1 11 I. j1 1 1 ,�,� 1. {, it , 'd l I II ;i,ll ri' ' 'I ! 1 J��' � ill, , , 1 , I '', 1 1 1 1 1 , / 1:'� 11, '+ 1 I ` 1�• q I 1 '' 1. ',' • ...1" ; , ,� �' � Iq. 1 + :� � 111 1 1 ''.� i•1, , 1 tr 1 _I r." I I 1'1 • 1 ' • � 11 1 ,. 1' y , ' 1 1 1 1 ,,i •' 1 : V,1 , I, , yr• , ,I i� . 1 M 11 : I' . ',� 1,1' IF 1 � 1 1�.'1.. 1�' 1' 11' 1 / ' i�'' A,,1 .11 1 ' 11," , �•y, : 11.1',1 '1 `' 1 ,I X111 ' 11. i• ,`. , IJ! �' ' 1, 1' 1' 1 1 1 •l l'1. 1 1 � I l i' '�'' 1� � X11 1 .1. 1•I. � f y 1, 1 � • I' �� •. :.'�: x••11 � ',l � 1 J' ; 1 I• 1 1 '� 'li�•I� li • 1 I 1 �, 'r lereeb em® � s3�me3® oaa I 1 I �� 1 f •J.. �'� ` 1� I ��N �® r y,' • 1 1':11 •'I�� I 1�1 (� 1 1 ' A " "' 'K,1h:A1tILi�9� � 4;'r.'A,+;li' +n iVi•i1 `I:YA�. ,(� Iem"em '1 ' iu' ,. •r� 1 I' � 1 1 ; 13'J�,` ► col � %,��0 • :' y l 1: �__ '1 1 li �'c ;'•i' ei � iil � 1 �� 1• I a , __ I1 •O .41 Q10 u'rr. 1 �- 1.1JOA Q Q 11 YI �• 13 i ucYlz%�► Sf e ' ';�• t oai�oa , Y, ,1 1 1 . (.• I ,� 1t 1 6d. 1,1,,, 7.• 11 + i , ` "� , 1' •��'n 1 � z 1 • .'1 .�'' i ' , I i 1 y �1 1 1 Y {`i 1nlnln t IIL,� 1 r''1L1 11 U V'1 I � �1 '•1 � "I ii' ' I' I.: I I .rl I �I�'1'. ' '1. I r � - + 1' I` � y� I ' I1i 11��1 Ir I "" I ��• / i�: �� 'i' i�l+ .. I'�1 ''1• Ili I +, 111', '. 1 I�'��1 � ,�� In 1 t�'��I �I � 5 'I 1 I �• I �'I rl �, r ,�, 1 . ' I 1 1. I� i n r i.. I 1,I '1 ±�, 1i � I ,'r 1u '1• I ' '.•;li ' N•I Iii I � y M 1 t ' X11.' ,1" I •�1�`, �L'� � p, I , I 4 ; I ,r I iI y � Ph ('.1_( 11 '1 •i u'LI•° 1 rl. ' •" .'t T I iy ,1 ✓ •' 1e { 1 ''-_•. ---•• � �' F' � i •u yr r t �i''.r ".- 'r--J-"v .— ti-- .�,..� I�' . 'I isM::'� p y rrr' `--- '• � I � �•;',1 , . ' +t ' ( .��!I, 1.�1 r it / 1 1 1� I I •1 11 ill, 11I �. + II I I' ' I; 1 1 11 � � � �� I 'l; T NI 1 111' • 1� I 1� I � I ' 11 1 Irllt ri I .11 1 1 1I, 1 1 Ir li� I i 1 II I I 1 III, II I •II it � I 1 '�' 11 •1,' f 1 0 � 1 ! I, 1 � (li1'1 1 ' I�•� r , �I ,' 1 1 1 I ' I A r, I 1 i 1'. I 1 II �1 1 V 1'I 1 1 �� •/ '1 r 1 1 1) •• I 1 ! �% I I r � ��l 4 1 1 r I I 1 1 1 1 1 - r , 1 I 1 4 1 1 1 r h 1 'r 1 1 1 / , •, 1r t ,, I ,' 10''1 ' 11 '•ui 1j11i r IJ•11 I i rJ 1 II ly I I ( , ' /I. 1' ♦ i �•�( 1 I II• I. ,,. I r 1 I'. 11 I i I� ,I' II J, il' 1 4.�• •��1 r�Vl I �� I�I�rll � I •�1 �1 L11 "1{ 1 1 1 !• 1,'111 r1j1 �r•� 1 1 'II �I• I •f+ 1 I 1� 1 1 � ♦ 1 I I I �I '.1 •.. 1' 1 "1 i•�Ir +• ' �� 'I •' III. 11 �I �.. 1'I 1• I• 1 I, •�. I /' 1 O • I • II. • t Y .1 • I• 1 ' I," 1 pt i 111 I I 1 1> 1 1 I r i �., IIINL'i ,r 01� I 1 . 11•.v r �rl' � �■I i � r ' 7 i�F II' I 1 t � 1 :11 1 I �1 ♦1 1 r j 1 '� 1, r ! 1 1 „' 7 � � 4 I ! 1. 17 1 1. I1 f 1 1`I. 1♦1 1� I ' 1 1 1' 41, "r. .�l 1 1 I'.LI r r f .1.• tr + �'1rl 11 *I.l II:, LI 1�1 1 1 '`1 .� t J �1 j1 �'r I �.� �I I r 1 r I I: ••f 1 • IVI I I ! ' 1 t\ ' 1 1 1 1 1 6 f l • 1 1 i , i l ' '' \• , 1 1 11 �l r 1 I�, li.� �1 1��1 1. il'1� r ".1 I ,.I� 11 Ili � 1 111 1 �Y •I� � 1. 1 1 'i '. II ' '' I' � II II "� i' 1111.4 ll• 1'.l , �L 1 1. 1, 1 r' 1 '�• Y1, �� ill ill, ,1 I .•I ��i �di V�111 1 r '1• 1 jf/1 1 ' 1 w•. ICI in a� I� 1 Ir M ' I!i '1,1�111'} �1lR �Ry( y P • 1'i moo. 11 r.� 41 1 / ♦ 1 t r' 1' / \: lllry n.I- l L t LI.LI� I 1� t t 1 l �' '•l 4 1 1 � I 1 � `� • it t 9 i• { ' • PPP 1' I L 1 •;� f Y • :`' J •'. 1 1 '�� 1,• 1, � '. ,� ! 1 1 1 _ ' 1 1 w I J ,,.i ','11111 I 'I I rr 4P1;. Ij 11i L ' II. 1 'I /I 111 I ♦ 1 1 ' I ') �� 1 Tip I ' I I t If1I 11 . / y 1 1 1 11 11/ Irl' 1I , 1 I 1! r, 1 �• I I I 1,' Y' 1 I l , I�In I !1 %j• I, �1 'll }I .ru rl i i 1 II �1 ,I rl 1 fl 1 I �1/ 11 r 1 fl i r I I 11 �. 1`: I! 1 � rl y 1y i1'II' ','11111 I 'I I rr 4P1;. Ij 11i L ' II. 1 'I /I 111 I ♦ 1 1 ' I ') �� 1 Tip I ' I I t I y 1 1 1 1•I i 1 1 ,, I 11 1J 1 1`: I! 1 � rl y r I r 11' 1 •1 I I'1 1 J 1 r .Ir 1 III I. I y ) I I (l, illl .'rl 1p 1 J ' r'1': I1llri A:,.CC I, YI . 1 1 ' 11 , I 1 141 Ilan •� r Ilj '.1 !I'I, CI I 1 1 n1 J ■ ■7 l :d 11 T, r II'1 11 1 I I • '�� I '1'1:1 il, Jrr �+r' •1'1'. ry li I I I�y1�'1� ! 1 i i J 1 l Y rl r ! s �•; , 1 ,,IIf {,!„ .� 1{ S1'.dl 1 I 1 1�l �: 1 1't+llr.lu 1 r 1 1 r1 1 i � L:• 1 Y I" Ir 1� ► ; J '' It L. , ♦ 1. 1 1 :1 I f} I r' r r�•'Il��;r� ..�Li ', 11 I1�•4,` � /Ii',I'11117.Q IjI ',; u ♦il, `I �I,1; tl',h t, I .i, t r U. LI � I , � ♦+ rl 1 1 I rl 1' I Gl ry' •I `1 I -: 1 1 4� Y i I 1 a 1 �LI .'1 t 1 1411 VI2 111 1 1 � X1111 r ^1{ � I 1 li 'I. t, {�,� i, ...i i' j T 1 i f. ♦1u�`1rY f .11 r• VIII A 1 1� Y �1 ,I ,'1 1 '.1 f 111 ♦ •'t yffp 4 JIq. .✓ r_:I 1. � r. .I 1I. ..t r. • ''1 11 f. rr (_i. I • ♦� I i (LI.I: �' 1 :I1 III' :'III ' 1�, i �1 I ,� I � • ',� 'rl:�� IL r''ll I .�I :''ti ' 11 II I , 1j I r � , I ,.•. 1 '..1 f„ I y I 1 II �r' II .,� ' I' 1 1 r i I �1 � I ♦ I�. 1 'I 1,. ' 1 I , , .li'� 11 , I '1, , L1' 'I I 1 1 d• 1 / 1 I I 1 1 ' ' •'1`II' L,II 1' I d ' • li ' 1'1 (�1�:�•II Illr 11. 1', it 1 ,'l l If ''1 � t 111�1Id it v I 1 I. �,11 1{ 1 1 ' ,,, r I 1 I1 ,a Ikl `'rul ', I •�,I ' VIII, kII 1 11.,/ � I I'• I Illy I ! / I II 1'1 "1 ' ' f „'li�l }� '. , ;. I I /'� I)II lyl�'Yr�'z 1� /��J i. 1 I' II iLl 1 p I i rI I'1 Irl � I•�1 � � i G �/ I / �� Irl i �'1' I'.1 I 1 17'.�I •� '.1 Y'I� ii�'�. �'V � 1 1 1. '1, M 11 � ♦�I A 1 !� I � s �r ; ?,.I r•�I '111 } •,II�'I. I log / I^ ♦y , I 'i,',1 loci �,1^ 1• �., 11 11 1 r I �� 1. 1 1 I /I III .�r 4 • 11 ♦ `� 1�` Ir 11 llnrt,''. `I (I1. I'l u'.il,,. , i � \t � ■'� • ,�1 I'I 111 1 f 11,1 i I�'1� �� r ��.� I � 1 •! �� I I 11' 11 '! 1 I, ♦1 Y��I�I � , dk r l r 1 I I r r �� ' �I, 1, l •, W , � ,I 11 1 I 1 L 1 fir' ♦ 1 '� 1 y.1 I,;l.''11+ 1'I;,LI 1 U'U!, l'klp f , •xy r , ,,fd' I ` •. i y r . a 1, ,� i r, ;x•11 �'', . ,1 ,�`,' _i\ � 11 f , •xy r , ,,fd' r � i. . i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY i C •r /� PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - TO be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Dovalopmant Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the 'initial Study. The Development 11aview Committee will meet and take action no later than ton (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be hoard. The Committoo will malte one of throe determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an dnvironmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: ©iaffcry Plaza APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Hone and Associates, 7333 Itellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamon a t -gglif 91730 (7141 q©9 -17C,7 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE QF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: RAMI•'. AS 11I3( - LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) SK LEMON /==. ASSESSORS NUM FR 201- 262 -16 _.. LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: _ NSA _ a 0 `1 PROJECT DC¢nnyrioN DESCRIPTION or PROJECT: , See ALtnchod ACREAGE or PROJ'LCT AREA AND SQUARE FOO'T'AGE Or EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY$ 4.55 aeros (195,442 sq ft.) Building aroa-34,00 der ft. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Or THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION Or ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NL•CESSARY SIIEETS)s IWV411. Lll1U 4Y,� Y UVn au.• v.... va r wv .w. r.vrv�. r......... ...... .. �...� and '— `divertcx3 ns rcau r.A row of large existing treos otiurs at the ^I love bank at the south botw] , creaL•in a natural screen between nd o project a the adjacent coed .tans. New landscaping and a wall will ccv plow -nt this natural acreen and act as a buffer to that adjacent development. views of rolling country-side (soon to be developed as residential use), as well as the mountains, will be captured by the project s to la t. The center will of course servo the needs of surrounding res dent al areas. lb-a new project will be consistent in is architectural theme and residential in dotall to relate in missing and scale to the surrounding suburban texture. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series' of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? I- 2 Q ss�rz, m►tIa rn arc X 1. Croato a•. substantial ghangu in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing .� noiuo or vibration) X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal sorvicos (police, fire, watOr, sewago, etc.)': X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Removu any existing troocl now many? X_ G. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, f lammables or explosives? Explanation of anyM answers abovei _ IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complato the form on the next page. C CRT IrICATION: i hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the beat of my ability, and that the facts, statemonts, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further u:lderstand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can bo made by the Davelopment Review committee. ! Date_ Signature ` r+- Title wn ~r Rt .l 16UUle"nVIS U CITY Of RANCHO CU' IMONGA THE GARDE„ � APARTMENTS COMIAUNrlY MOMEOWI k, 46SOCIATION HB U �1; ter) o ire AM N4 , 1 '�,' PM o�o�li'��itJ;, ,�r 'i�f3;'J�tU�11�Zt9.�Q�8,�lhJG nti'A�.lcih�„t��n,�.4�17ot �► February 2, 1980 Nichuel Vuirin Associate i'?n'tnoro planning Comrnienion Rancho Cuaams•.ngs►, California. 91770 Doar Mr. Vairins At the nuggoutiau of Din llondryeks, I are writing to express the objuctior.d of the Gnrdrrn Apartments llomuowncrrs' Association to the 1)3'01 )need Chaffey Plaza at tho eornor of Lemon ane. Havon a-61 ito request for a conditional use permit ( /,'79 -02). Thr homoownors of our twonty —five units regard our complex an of high quality and are, thorofnro, concerned that Doug Hone's dovolopment will lend to the dotar.ioration of our noighborhood. We are onpoeially opposed to the prospects of a gasoline ntatiou being bLilt ndjnoont to us. We believe tha'b a gas station will be unsightly and will i.ttcroase traffic lutzardr with care roontoring Haven, turning .loft i'rem Havens and long lines forminf- during Gas shortages. We are also roneernod that the proposed two -story office building will significantly block our view and invade tho privacy of our hornos'. hinally, we tire definitely opposed to a fast —roo=t establishment adjacent to our residences. The proposed drive —in, lilcu the gasolino station, will undoubtedly increase traffic hazards becauuo of overflow traffic. Purthormoro, Such an ostablIshmont most certainly will bring loitorors and., thorefora, littur and vandalism to our homos. I t3'ut:t that you will soriou.O.y consider our objections in your rucommundation to the plam.:.tg Commission. Our concern is that no commercial dovoloprnent on Havon Aventt,2 thre -aton the iino quality of our home environment and neighborhood. Sincerely, 0. Sidra y Silliman presidonL I 0 W 3. Six (6) f Sot block wnilu, mannurad from the highest grade nt the location of nuch wall, nhnll be conntructud along the went and south property linen in conjunction with Phanu I. t.. Denno landnenping shnll be provided along the went and south property linen. p_.W1 Z 9. A ratio of 20% of the treat; to be 1) on ti site shn11 be specimen size tracu, Wed 6. All street landscaping along Lmnon and Haven shell be installed in conjunction with Phaoo I. In addi- tion, mounding shall be provided wherever pusnlble and hedgen in front of the drivo -thru window of the restaurant. No additions t son will be permitted in the davolopncn unlearn _.it � take-out onl,�t,1i -au-, —aetinR• 84 Tito service station shall be redesigned to incorporate tile use of more woods and color. Such design shall be reviewed and approved by tl:e Design Review Committee prior to inouance of building permits. 10 Tl:e sigds shown on ti:e plane are not approved and will ragnira separate sign review and approval by the Plan- ning Division. APPROVED AND ADOPTED 711IS 25:111 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1980 PLANNING COMMISSION OF 175: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �A al, ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, peened, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of February, 1980. by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 80 -07 A RESOLUTION OP' THE RANCHO CUCMIONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING SITE APPROVAL NO, 00 -01 LOCA111D ON THE SOU• 11WE8T CORNER OF HAVEN AND L12ION IN THE C -1 ZONE MIEREAS, on December 249 1979, a formal application wan nubmitted requenting review of the .cbova described projectl and WIIEREAS, on February 25, 1900; the Planning Commission hold a duly advertised public hearing for the above described projoct. NOW, THEREFORE, ME RANCHO CUCAMONM PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I That the following findings have been made: 1. That the site is adequate in size and shape. 2. That the site lion adequate accuse. 3. That the proposed uoa will have no adverse effect on abutting property. 4. That the proposed use is consistent with the general Plan. 5. That the conditions listed in this report arc neceoanry to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenionce, and general welfare. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration to issued on February 250 1980. SECTION 3: That Site Approval No. 80 -01 is approved subjcct to the following conditions and the attached standard conditions: Additional PlonninR Conditions: 1. Only the site plan concept of the restaurant in approved. Final site plan review and design rvv1t}:d N will be required prior to issuance of build!ne,pa :rmita for this pad. In addition, the reatra raa aapncaty shall not cxt,:ad 64 sAats. 2. Vacorit building pad,7 within the et ,Ypi.ng center slrall be tcmporatrlly Turfed and llrrt,,rttijd until. they are built upgn.. Such detta`L, kspll fro 1nrle3xd In the detailed i.an4,i; ,- .;nd !r, igatior, plane. DEPARTMENT OF CO14MUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS doled #ArFfk0VaL NO' 00-01 Bubjoott_ -rte Abnlicantt an n .=p !!t ' . Locations-50, I-avlzr) f,J Lemon 1 Thong atoms aheakod are conditions of approval. w r APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT '11lr PLANNING DIVISION M": COMPLIANCE WITH' THE FO WI y CONDITIONSt l A. Bite Dnvelopmnnt 1. Site shall be developed in ancordanco with the approvad sit tns on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained horoi 2. Revised site plane and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in offact at time of Building Permit irouanco. _ A. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sidoyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant. to City standards. S. Mail boxes, in arson whore sidewalks are raquirodt shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Uivision. G. Trash receptacle areas shall be anelonod b; a G foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall Y be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area donignatod by the Foothill j Piro District no "hazardoust, the roof materials must be approved by the Piro Chief ant? Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. The developer shall intoqrato a variety of approved roof materials and colors into the design of the residential development in a mannor which is both compatible and complimentary among eauh of the renidential units. —L_ 9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally 7 integrated, shinldod from view and the sound bufferwti from adjacent properties and stroota as required by the Planninq and Building Divisions. 10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained heroin shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Coamunity Development. .. Parkin and Vehicular Acanno_ i' 1. All parking lo landscaped iolands ,.`toli have n minimum inside dimension t of 41 and "hall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking ntall. 2. Parking lot lights shall be a maximum height of 12' Prom the finished grade from all lines, adjacent %— of the parking surface and directed away proper�.y 3. strooto and raoidnncas, Parking lot trace shall be a minimum 15 Yellen size. / 4. All two -way aisle width" shall be a minimum of 24 foot wide, 5. Emergency access shall be provided , maintenance free and clear, it minimum in with roothill of 24 foot wide at all times during conatrIuction accordance Ciro District roquiremanta. / G. All parking spaces ahall be double stripped, C. Landscaping / 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved T by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building pormits. 2. A Maxtor Plan of the Existing on -Site Trace shall be provided to the Co _ Planning Division prior to the building issuance of g permits prior grading to determine which trees shall be retained. 3. Existing Eucalyptus trace shall be retained wherever P0031ble and shall be _ trimmed and topped .t 30'. Doad, decaying or potentially dangerous troes Planning Division shall be approved for removal at the discretion of the Plan of Existing on-Site Trees. Those during the review of the Mootor are approved for removal shall be roplacod on a trno- for -treo troop which basis as provided by the Planning Division. 4. Street trans, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall bn installed Rancho in accordance with the Maxtor Plan of-street treen for the City of 30' oa intorior streets Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trace per gross acre, comprised of the following aizos, "hall ° be provided within the dovelopmontl 20e -24" box or larger, 709 -15 gallon, and 10e -S gallon. / G. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condi- tion, free from woods, trash, and debris. �' i U D. Di nn 1. Any nigna propound for this development shall be dosignad, in conformance with the Comprohonaiva Sign Ordinance on,4 shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such nigna. 2. A uniform sign program for thin development ahnll be nubmittad to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to isnuancu of Duilding permits. G. Rocrontion _ 1. The dovolopor in required to obtain the following signed statemon: by purchanora of homes which have a private or public equestrian tra:%,l on or adjacent to th4ir property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract _, on (data) , I have road the CCeR'n and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual reciprocal casement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. F. Add itio nalApprovals Required I. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit in granted for a period of months) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. 0 U APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION t'OR COMPLIANCE" WITH T118" FOLLOWING CONDITIONS t G. Site nnyolopmont 1. The applicant shall comply with the latout adopted Uniform Building Code, T T Uniform Mechanical Codo, Uniform Plumbing Coda, National Mactric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinancen in affect at the time of approval of thin project. / 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, _ 7-" evidence shall be submitted to ttie Foothill Dist rict..riro. CIA af that water supply for fire protection is available. 9, Prior to the issuance of a build&ng permit for a now residential dwelling unit(o) or major addition to an existing unit(s), tlta applicant shall pa/ development face at tlta established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited tot City Beautification Poo, Park rant Drainage Foot Systems Dovolopmont roo, Permit and Plan Chocking foss, and school fan. A. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a now commorcial or industrial "%— dovoletenant or additiun to an existing development, tine applicant shall pay dovo,.opmont fees at the notablinhod rate. Such foes may inclr,do, but not be '.imitod tot Systems Development roo', Drainage roo, Permit and Plan Cl-,ocking foes. ® / 7-' S. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not ismuod for thin projact within one year from the data of project approval. G. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building offical. It. Existing Structures 1. provide comp lianco with the Uniform Building Coda for property lino clearances considering use, area and firo- rooistivoneas of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with currant Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. _ J. Existing acwago disposal facilities Shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practicoa and the Uniform Plumbinrl Coda. �. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. 1 _ 2. A i'o report shall be proparod by a qualified engineer licensed by the at of California to perform such work. 2. ological report shall be prepared by a qualified onginuor or geologist submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 'CAo final grading plan shell be subject to roviow and approval by the planning, rngincoring and wilding Divisions and shall ba completed prior to recordation of the final nubdivinion map or ionuaneo of building permit whiohovor comes first. eeJUALL CONTACT THE L *NOINBL"nm DIvnioN roR COMPLIANCE" WITH THE rOLLOWINO Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rich tn- of -•- +ay F I all necogna�x'anoulnoon, s shown on tin tontativo -on" PM 5 903 prltlr ibiNt►nte of b4 WeF►�wts fol" all's %we ication shaU be madnnof the following missing rightn -of -way on the follow!.ng strooL•s� ' additional foot on additional foot on additional foot on _ 3. Corner property line radius will be required par City stand rda.i —r Q. All rights of vehicular ingress to and ogross from shal o dedicated as followns Av 5. pociprocal casements shall be provided on uring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. x G. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingross, engross and internal circulation of any tracks which will bo used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of tlio proposed business. K. Street improvements 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway tress and street lights on all interior streets. �1 r K 2. Construct the followin7i=�Inq improvements including, tot 2 but not limited DTMET NhME CU1W G OUTTElt A.C. PVMT. G DL "- ALK DRIVE APPR. GTHELT LIMITS A.C- OVERLAy WhEEL CHAIR PMIPG T1 F:R 5Me laln . facilities required by the City Engineer. X 2. Y an µ x X 3. x x_ X x )revisions of that program and City Ordinance No. 24. x 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protoct the structures by diverting shoat runoff to stractsia(• *.9 La wuo h _ K 3, Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroach - mont permit and foes shell be obtained from the City Engineor'a Office, in addition to any other permits required. 4. ;?trout improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Reyiaturod Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit, S S. surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing compleeion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the insuanco of building permits, whichever comas first. G. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement stripiag, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed par the requirements of tlo City Engineer. x $ ' Ra-4en Ave � La►noh A.ue Intars'ec41o.. '"" "' sl�hAl�s.ed AA' Ae a•udopc►rf expeP%fe. C•s+ e.xpQrloeo -ce wbovo. 4-la of dkc SY•�nv�s dtu.l•p►�,e�� Fee wtil for- rc'w..bNrreA . L. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onnite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. X 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locationat J•/A��!S JP m T I-CM a 4 acAg a <1 _ X 3. The proposed project falls within aroas indicated as subject ':o flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to ';he )revisions of that program and City Ordinance No. 24. x 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protoct the structures by diverting shoat runoff to stractsia(• *.9 La wuo h X S. Thn following north -nouth ntrmetn shall be designed no major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, eonmflor- cial typo drive appronohon, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or lnndnaapod earth berms and rolled driveways at property line: dAms. Aye _ `_. M. Uti.lition ,_ (L 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major artorialn losa than 12 K'% 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Lnglnoor. h 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of exiating public utilities, no ruquirod. 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. C� 5. Watur and sower syntom plans shall be designed and constructed to meat requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental 11oalth Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from CCWD will be required prior to recordation. X G. Approva:a have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be recoivol from them. N. General Reguiremonto and Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as followa: A. Caltrans for: D. County Dust Abatamant (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Dthor: 2. A copy of the Covunant3, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the homeowners Association, subject to tho approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a espy provided to the City. II ;11 ', In I'. . I 1 ' 1 ,1 1 , 11 1 I L � 111'1 ' 1'1• 1 1 I "•1.I I 1 ' ,L N �M 1 �n Yi .111'1 1,1 ail 1 •I,r 1 11 'Ir 1 M`i 1 iII'11�1' r'll1�, I� I' 11'11'i�_,A 1 , l 'II. i 11, 11 �f 1 I. I�IIr , 1111 Ili rl I'1 1 il. ,(• �', 1 +1,'71,17 ' 1 •' I 11 1� 1; .Ir 1. ' I" ,'I ' i�•1 .1 \I� 11. 1111'r "' ✓. 1 rll' Ilk ':Jir. rl'r Yll. �I rl,'1 J I m•. ..I 1 N 1'1 11'L.6 i 1171 1 � 1 1 1 1 � 1 I 1 r ��' I I� '1�•: ,'Y 1:, ' I f I 1 1�� 1 1'� I,� I / I1. , r ` 1 1 11 . • 1 I �r / � 1 .'l } .5r /. i, I I , i.. i '! t 1 i 1 \ I r / / (�..� 1 /1 1 1 1 1 I Ll' 1 1 i�,1 !4 :l `� 1.':, I,', � I 4 .y 1 !11 t 1', f. 1'.I jl• ' ,'. ti 1� " rrl'.7 rl' 1 (, ;' fl ,1' 1 I) I1 I-•''{r\ i,' 1 .11 Il 1 ) ! �j 17 ,'1 I 7t )'1 I 1��. •I 1 , . I � 1'r 1 ) r„ 1: 1 f • !7 I 4 � e . ' y. +' 1.1 I' ,l. 1 , 1 .� L STAPP RRVORT DATE: Pobruary 25, 1900 TO: planning Co "1111.801011 PROM, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development SUBRC'T: NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ZONING ORDINANVE AMKNDMRN'T NO. 00 -01 - CONDO CONVLRBION - 'Thn development of condominium convornion ordinnnca. ADsTRACT: As the Planning Co:mninnion will recall, late lnat your, the issue of convornion of apartmentu to condominiums nrosu. Staff ouggontad a work program for ttre development of n condominium conversion ordinance and a possible moratorium on the conversion of apartments to �!ondominiumo. Work lino proeooded oil the condo- minium convornion ordinnnco however, no moratorium wan adopted. Thera hnvo been no convorsiona of apartmentu into condominiums nor raquests for such to date. Tine developer(a) have ngread not to submit any convaroions until such time an the City lino adopted a Condominium Convoruion Ordinance or`AuziJ.. -30,,, 1900, whichever in sooner. Attached, plenon find the results of tine efforts of the Condominium Conversion Committee composed of staff, the DIA, C 6 L Developers, Lewin Roman, Chamber of Cowiwrce and the Board of Realtors. Tho ordinance is not booed upon any vncancy factor but on the annual limitation and tl:e time limit. It ontablinhod 250 units as the 1979 multiple family dwulling unit number. At our Condo- Convoraion Committee meeting, C b L and the BIA expressed their oupport of the ordinance as a whole; however, they have not aeon the final version and may have some concern over oclactivo sections of tl:e ordinance. In order for title item to meet the Auril 30th deadline, the Planning Commission must take action on this item n.onight. RIXOMMENDATION: It in recommended that tine Planning Commiosion recommcne. approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 00 -01 to the City Council. Re poctfully submitted, JACK LAP,, Director of Community Development JL:BKII:cd Alm Attachme:.t: Initial Sutdy Proposed Ordinance IT01 "I"