Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980/03/12 - Agenda Packet,1 I i r1 q ('(�' it I 11 'r •i a'' •1' ",", I1 1..,11 ; { '�,• 1� •1 I r �I i. 1 r Ytl' "', IfAl �f 1 lyt f ' , 1., 1 If 1 f��• IJ�'•� ( 1 ,ACTION Approve 5 -0 Approve 5 -0 Approved 5 -0 CI'1Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Wedneaday, March 12, 1980, 7:00 p.m. L:ona Park Coammnity Cantor 9161 .Base Lino, Rancho Cucamonga, California I. rl'age of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl X Commissioner Gnrcia--.X_- Commissioner Jones x III. Approval of Minutes February 13, 1980 February 25, 1980 IV. Announcementn V. Consent Calendar A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Commissioner Rampol X Commissioner Tolstoy X u.0 W. .. /OI - FRANK J. FINK - Dividing a lot into two parcels for property located on the northeast corner of Haven and Lawn Avenues. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF PARCEL MAP `O. 5130 - Approvers 5 -0 HARRIS B._ COHEN - Dividing a lot into three parcels 1, for property located on the east side of Amethyst t, Avenue, between Monte Vista Avenue and 19th Street. Assessor's Parcel No. 202 - 121 -18. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5922 - Approved 5 -0 J. RICHARD NEWTON - Dividing a lot into four parcels for property located on the east side of Jasper Avenue at Gala Avenue. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF PA ^.:EL MAP NO. 5893 - Approved 5 -0 ROBERT BARTON - Dividing a lot into two parcels for property located on the north side of Victoria Avenue, east of Etiwanda. Assessor's Parcel No. 227 - 061 -67. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 80 -07 - Approved 5 -0 CHARLES KALBACH - The development of a retail center to be located on the southeast corner of Arrow and i` Archibald. Planning Commission Agdndn March 12� 1980 Pogo 2 VI. Public Hearings Approved 5 -0 F. 'LONE CHANGE NO. BO- JOIIN ISAACS - A chn property located on and East: Avenue. G. Continued to 3/26/80 5 -0 V.w 101\a I♦u LO UI:O DI'I IS I \1 — t rono from R -3 to C -2 for northwest corner of Bann Line VII. Old Buninaso Ii. REQUEST Be HENRY REITER for the use of flags for an Continued to 3/26/80 industrial. lea ping office located on the southwest 5 -0 corner of ,Arrow and Archibald.' VIII. New Business I. DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 80 -05 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - Approved 4 -1 JOHN ISAACS -- Tito development of a service station center Tolstoy opposed - felt proposed on the northwest corner of Doan Line and East situ over utilized Avenues. J. MINOR DEVIATION N0. 80 -02 - JOHN ISAACS - Deviation of Approved 5 -0 not -backs for the service station center proposed on the northwest corner. of Bane Line and East Avenue. Adjourned 10:45 p.m. 9 K. TIME EXTENSION FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -05 - JERRY Approved 5 -0 LANTING - A request lino been received for u one year time extension for the 138 unit apartment complex located on Archibald Avenue, south of 19th Street. IX. Council Referral X. Director's ReporLo Stqff directed to pre- L. REPORT regarding Hillside Development Standards. pare Hillside Develop. Standards M. COMMUNICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION regarding tentative Presented orally G hearing achedule for General Plan. meeting dates set XI. Public Comment - Anyone wishing to comment on any items not listed on the Agenda may do no at this time. XII. Upcoming Agenda 1. 'Lone Change No. 80 -03 - Coleman 2. Diree..or Raview No. 80 -08 - Loftus Adjourned 10:45 p.m. 9 0117 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PI.ANNINO COMMISSION AGENDA Wednauday, March 121 1900, 7tQ9 p.m. Liona Park Community Center 9161 Base 'tins, Rnncho Cucamonga, ".alifornin I. Pladga of Allegiance 11. Roll Celt Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rompol Commissioner Garcia Commissioner Tolatoy. Conmiosionar Jones III. Approval of Minutes ['ebruary 13, 1980 Fubivary 25, 1980 IV. Annoancoments V. Consent Calendar A. ENVI:2O MENTAL ASSESSMENT OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5767 - FRANK J. FINK - Dividing a lot into two parcala for property located on the northeast corner of haven and Lemon Avanuas. S. ENVIRO4M ENTAtl ASSESSMENT OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5130 - i ", HARRIE S. COOEN - Dividing a lot into three parcels %! for property located on the east side of Amethyst ;r• Avenue, between Monte Vista Avenue and 19th Street. Assessor's Parcel, No. 202- 121 -18. r., C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5922 J. RICHARD NEWTON - Dividing a lot into four parcels for property located on the east side of Jasper Avenue ? �y at Gala Avenue. r "1 L. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSF.HSMENT OF PARCEL MAP NO. 5893 - ,`. ROBERT BARTON - Dividing.a lot into two parcels for property located on the north side of Victoria Avenue, east of Etiwanda. Assessor's Parcel No. 227 - 061 -67. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF DIRECTOR REVIEW N0. 80 -07 - }` CHARLES KALSACII - The development of a retail center . to be located on the southeast corner of Arrow and Archibald. ( pinnning Comminnion Agenda i March 12, 1980 t Page 2 VI. public hearings Y, ZONE CHANGE JOHN ISAACS I", 1 property T6 0 11V- UV -VI #%AIU 1',"VLKVg IVINKA4 /WUISU`IMENA: - - A chongn of none from R -3 to C -2 for Gated on the northwest coiner of Dean Line VII. 1 Business REQUEST BY HENRY REITER• for the use of flags for an industrial leasing office located on the southwest .[ corner of Arrow and Archibald. VIll. w Business I. DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 80 -05 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - JOAN ISAACS - The developulent of a service station center proposed on the northwent turner of Base Line and East Avenues, J. MINOR DEVIATION NO. 80 -62 - JOHN ISAACS - Deviation of set -backs for the eetvico station center proponod on 1 the northwest corner of been Line and East Avunue. r K. TIME ERTENSION FOR DIRGI,'TOR REVIEW NO. 79 -05 - JERRY LANTING - A request has been received for a one year time extension for the 136 unit apartment complex located on Archibald Avenuu, south of 19th Street. 1 i f` 1. Zone Change No. 80 -03 - Coleman 2. Director Review No. 80 -08 - Loftus :entative ems not 2 �,r r II \ I III ! 1 r { ,',1 I i I�'1 Il' � 1 1 11'x1 �. I 1 ,1•� , , 1 , 1!, 1 I ',' 1 1 r { 1 11,1 f 1 1 • I I I ,1, 1 I Il 1 i 1 �� .. i '1u� 1� 1Y 11f'I 111 �!'1 ♦ ,I , , 1 lI !I 1 1 • 1 I•.� I 1 ,1 , 1 /� 11 1 1, • 1 111 1 , t 1 II ' �, l 1 1 II •�' / I,I I� 1 , ! .' �r \ 61' 11 .I' jjl /f1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 ' , ,, ' 1 I 11 I � � � 1 II A U I I 11. � • 1 I •. I I I,. I I ,' I , 1' , I I, 1111 , I 11 � '1 1 \ I.�'r ♦ � III 11'!'.1 1 1 1.1 ,11 I I I ,, I' , ., 1 , 'ny 1 'I •il L 1 '1 1 , I i I.11,'1 I r I j 111 Y - , 1 ,I ail I ' I I ' , Ir I 1,1 II I 1 i 1�, �� r I I I� ' "{ ♦. 1 ' �,� ( 1 I j��I 11 11 \. 14Y I ��V ' 1IY�, I r, lr I I 1 .Y. 11 I r,l 1 I 1 'll 'jtl I l i I .11 111 `'1, 11., AI 1 �„ r I II I -/ 1 4 III I •r, .�1 11 .51 I I/ l,l. r1 r. 1,1 I i' 1, , "V(., , i I. I• 11 ,1 •, +' II 1 l 11. 1" ll r Ip I .tl• ,11 '., ''11' • 11 1; I.,r irr i 1 t L, , II /.I• . • �1�•,1'1�'•Y, 111. L1 {�� lil •'I�',i /I� il'I ••,lu I, "1 ,, �11 x111 I' i I• II I I f• x1111 I,I•I,� . I r 1I:; P• 1:1 t. \'I , I ; 1 1A'Jry +' n11,'1 1 I I'i I. I ✓ 1 Y A � r '1 1 II , I L is �•• �,'r:;�'�, .', Ali 7•; • '- 1 r I ' \ r `11} i• it I r l I. 11�.\ r !, t � r 1 I 1 .1'1 �' �1.J V V V I I I ':+ IJ r r l L 1 `'. f / I/ :. �•♦ 1 1 +' 1 '. , '1 1 � ,.. 1 1 I 1 r• e. -t II , 1 '1� z,� I C '. s: 1 � �y; II 1 � II 1 0 �A1 II i, I n ltr 1' , 1 }Y '. �.L ;1. I \�J�, 11�! ( \I • I C I'III ':,h 11 �. 1' I'1 1 � ,. , r A,. (': n .r ! , • :q YI �,. . 1''1 1 1 "1 f •: - }r. ', 1 .'( 1 :rr 1 ,�: ;♦ 1,\ :11 .n .' i I. , '1, Ill rl• X11 �. '�I � '�' I, Il• 11 ', 1•',!+ 1. 1, 1 � I', 1 1 1 { li �� I. I 1 ,1 i,.'ili { •.II 1 1 ;�, �J tl � 1 1 1, 1 1 , 1, � ll w', 11 ll' I I , 1 11 • (1 1 , {1 .� I ,ll � I,� I +� 1 L. 111 1, 1 . 1 ,, 1, II 1. 1 ! '.i I ' • i { 1 1, 11 1 �I, I, Ili ` 1 YI I i� it ,t I I .i 1 {'• 1 1 1 � 1 I ul 1, , 1 r 1 l 1 ,. 1 1 1 ,1 1 ll , 1 I , � •�� , 1` , I i I � � � , ,1 I j1 � 1 1 1 � �y I I , 'I , 1 1; I 1,( � j • I r I I! I' � I 1, ! r Y r, , I' I ,I / Ir � 111 1j• �I I 1 I Iii' „ 11. I�1�1� Ir 1 II �' 1. 1 I t V f ,�I .•I ' �; , 1... I1 I' 11 1' I, Ll A I1� 11 �Il; 11!I + I Y I' . , 1 ', ul, ._ I M• , {'t. II I�11 1,1 �11� li � r 11 l � � r�,�i I , � •.,. , I. 1 u ,', l l ..1 1 / ..1 it I � , � I, , 1 l l I'h 1 , I II �.. I 1 / I ` 1 , ,..1 I + I 1 , J,. 1 r • 1 'I ' 11 I ' Il r>/. I n1.111'�ll 1 I �, � i , 1. 1 LL (, lil 1 r ,I! � •�1 � r i , "' , 1 1� 1' • + ,� ' ,11' I{ 1 } � , w 1 � � , : i ''.I 1, I' „l 1 111 :�I r ,,• i� II, �1 ' �r/, •'�,�I ' �.� 11'I L'. ��1 .1 �t1� 1.If�r/ I � 1•+ rl 'I ,' 1 lil 1:,,�1 1 , 11 r , 11, !, �.t 1 �1. v 11,, i, 1� 1 i. ,I�1� • I, II ,. � 1 , 11 , 1 ,:I,• � 1 i � 1 1 1 1 ., I•, , � � r 1 1 �1� �;.o�•• ,; • 1 Ii ��I 1 II 1 11 11 ,. I I 1�■'��� , 1 � �', r Il 1 J 1 1 NON 0 � t • ICI �.I r 1 +, MINIM , 1 r, I ; , ,11 ,1 � • • I I,; r s 1. i} �p L , l r '.l '� ! , , a � C.'' t .:, Ir 1. u�.,l • � j 1 /' t,� i 1,� w , •, 1' r Lli 11 1J, U''U U,4 1 '� r• 1 , r r f �' l l I N . Yr 1 , 11. 1 p1 I, r ., I rr � 1 ;' i , f '. I I l 1 l � � it : , �i' r � ;' . � ' � I l• I ' ( . I' i t ' : I !.� 1 ` • 1 � t ,+ rl 4. . A s: LE LJ •'',i DATES TOt FROH: fly t CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 120 1900 PLANNING COMMISSION JACK LAM, Director of Community Development DAN COLEMAN, Junior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR PA11m. MAP NO. 5767 - FINI: - Request to divide approximately .49 acres of land into two (L) parcels in the R -1 zone located on the NEC of Haven and Lemon. BACKGROUND: This review is for environmental assessment to determine any significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the parcel map heroin described. To determine si.gnificnnt adverse impacts, an Initial Study of environmental concerns is prepared. Upon completion of that study, evidence would indicate either no significant impacts or the potential for significant adverse impacts. If a determination of no significant impact is made, based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration may be issued for the !:reject. If significant impacts are found, then an environmental impact report should be required to fully analyze the potential impacts of the project. The applicant is requesting to divide approximately .49 acres into two (2) parcels. This subdivision will create a legal lot for ownership purposes for an existing residence with the remainder parcel to be available for future development. The zoning is R -1 which requires a 7,200 square foot minimum lot. The General Plan designates thin area as low density residential, 2 to 5 un :ts per gross acre. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGS The s!te consists of two graded building pads and an existing residence on the lower portion; full street improvements are in on Dakota Avenue. An existing paved access road extends along the :northern edge of the site. There is an existing Eucalyptus windrow on the northern boundary of the site. Following is the adjacent land use and zoning of the site: LAND USE 'ZONING NORTH Vacant R -1 SOUTH Single Family Residence R -1 EAST Single Family Residence R -1 WEST Vacant R -1 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study has hour, completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. The environmental checklist Akk has been completed by staff, and no significant adverse environmental impacts qP were found. ITEM "A° Page 2 RECOMMENVATIONs Banod upon nnalyalo of tho Initial Study, it thn project will not cauno nignificant' advarac Impacta upon the If the Commission concurnp then the itiounvice of a Negative Decl thn project would be in order. ric pectfIlly Oubmittedo JACK W1, Director of Community Drvelopment JLtDCtcd Attachmento: Parcel Hap, Part I Initial Study At tl i I M rl L? 0 J -LO Lf Ll Lt,- j: (b v X . TENVI IVE wR��a PARCEL MAP NO. 5 767 IN111 INI1,1 • 1 A110CIAII6 INSINIIII IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ON,A110, CALIIOANIA NEWS A DIVISION Of LOT 90,'T/1A0r NO. 9470 AS NSCOROID IN ROOM 115, PAOG RS AND 04, RECORDS Of SAN BERNARDINO COuN,Y, CALVCANIA t 1 0X111cm , A. /A•AC r � � „� rll I' _ 1.•s�ra. c ,LfA LOMA Vlr, Immee mA11 Al ® •.• I \1 • i •111 \I. V •1 u.»w ✓u•uwrr Pf. VY• q•Y Jf ,lain "to • .1 i •hy hr eI t e raw w. p I1�I1 nj'i11` �, •' \, 4y c •. %AI,I LAN. ,•o •f.' w�.• 1 jTo::' lin— 111' I . w•I / SEAL[ I' \AO' ' NOTES • I•••• a''•f UIWb wrwr.•.w on fsVn...a M •a4Y U W Q•r Trw/ h0 wJ Ier MS 4: 'wKS• o.•/ hud! h.^La xau/ hlM.ew M• r.ynu•w.r•/ Ibuw ••• -".� -� PARCEL 1 /ur•Ww.n r. -u•caI l.•e•. u....n rV 111, f Lf.nll• Iv 1 I .. L'_` ^ 4� r)r.All11 ♦•'/ JeaY4 L O JIwaI • I :• I I 1 •�y � A /V•.I•rr/•fr N. )I.V•w l/.I•s r 1 E ) �� ' I•wrW 6. WT CMrTr ^. I•••• 1 1 • •• • 1 ' n� ur.er.f\ f T I y'111'. W' N ♦..•'f my FF +n.c1 •I.. h/ o Iaeye'J,.J YI 4y c •. %AI,I LAN. .v Ln M•yl .n u•wfr•rµw• w•I / SEAL[ I' \AO' ' NOTES • I•••• a''•f UIWb wrwr.•.w on fsVn...a M •a4Y U W Q•r Trw/ h0 wJ Ier MS 4: 'wKS• o.•/ hud! h.^La xau/ hlM.ew M• r.ynu•w.r•/ Ibuw . • ew. wr ..n .rv.,a e. nu MU •.Ir.s,rahr /e.lw /ur•Ww.n r. -u•caI l.•e•. u....n 111, f Lf.nll• Iv 1 I .. L'_` ^ 4� r)r.All11 ♦•'/ JeaY4 •b MI�i r U I.e .wJIJ.• 1• ” • •ry,urnr•4L•. .P r.\••�., 1 la n' •.- 4— M"0114p-67 MEET ti ,1 11 CITY 01+ RANC110 CUCAMONGA otiom81 Poor Quality INITIAL STUDY PAtt'1' I - PROJECT X111.10 'IATJON SIILCT - To bn compl.eL•ed by applicant Environmental Anaosamont Review root $70.00 For all projecta requiring onvironmontnl rovkw, thia form must bo completed and submitted to the Davelopment Review Committee through L•hu departmont whero the project application in made. Upon receipt of ,this application, the Environmental Analysis sL-aff. will preparo Part 1I of L•he Initial. Study. The Development Ileviea Committee will, meet and take action no later than ton (10) days before the public meeL•ing at which time L•ho W4(doct is to be heard. The COMnittoo will mako one of throe determinations: 1) Tho project will have no onvironmenL•al impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an onvironment:al impact and an Environmental Impact Report.will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should t .)o supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJL''CT TITLE: 1,06 !IRLI t APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: _ PT11111; ,I. 1,111k NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE Or PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: 9' LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSrSSOR P.1f!CI:I. No.) I. 1 LIST OTHER PERMT.TS NIXESSARY FROM LOCAL., REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL, AGENCIES AND VIE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: x -i Ordsinw Poor ouality r r ' ® OW Poor duality PROJECT hiT SSCRIP'1'ION WOW . DESCRIPTION Or PROJL•'CTs J,ot .1,01t. Prm.miL IoL comnit.Ln of i2 �JIIU.0 lu'' flLign _ of nrnd ux. ' /140 i,n.l'L. un. tbl ' x.M ). l,os. , r • . J 1111 L -$ �1 I",, cn �j►u..uJ,iut�J,wo nrn %rcnnt bu1, a1Lh tI.,I,% C to wrt). iJ t, v n( o rrvstr: thri u, 'ut'r, vIA and tnLo voiwrr toloo t—� or, ii' uouulblu, cemarntu both u)dn inLu iIIIJIVioU111 1016b. AC1UsAGL' Or PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE Or EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, Ir ANY: rotni uxit..l,inc nV;/ - +:014.0x. ,p'o'i' x lu5' . lowur and it., with huut;u. DESCRILE THE ENVI1 ?0NMMrrA1.1 SNI "PING or '1'111: PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INPORMTION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLAM'S (TROES) , ANIMALS, A14Y CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE Or SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE D14F ^RIPTION Or ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY S?1EG'rS) s Lxi�Linre ; budroum home wr.r; conntruc.L,m within Lho lent tv.o Y4217r; Ind it of rwoiduntinl nnturn. Heim in orculriud nsm Irind- xft and niLc on Witt low•or pawl. The oLhur Lao pour. are Marc rmu ,x .nrld to thu -ud of Lin doyol oi•munt. Ac.rurr• from Lho c:rLtl �11rIr. nre rk. I dwit.in.l humor nirdIrpr in_runr tructlou to LLu rxic- tim, how: (;II tin lotimr Imd. Po C111111 6! ir. Lu ;ul;s n�.•iv wood uo r �quirud. Yosoiblu nu4u•Lruction of 11(1 I; on , u: au uinp ;:p pn%-u' _W,U.jI(I_on1v_rt)m Ir o Hit, doveln•an.mt, rind rrnhnime tiro rcotrcry mm r Snrvirolwwntrrl auLLiul(. n LJ Is the projecL•, Part Of a largor project, one of a oeric -6' Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, 1110Y as a whole have significant enviromnental impact? x -2 above I hereby cc!rt:ity that the statements rurnished above and in t:he attached exhibi.L•n prenenh the date and inforwaL•.ion regriired for Lthin i.ni.L•ial evalunL•i.on to Llie bent of my abillLy, ,end that t:ho L'ncLn, (:LaLemonts, and inforuint•i.on Pr.(r,:m(ted are true -111(3 correct to the best of My knowledge and belief. I further understand LIIL t addi.t•ion,il inrorinaL•ion may he requirerl to be slibmlLtcrl t?ef.�re nn a(IcgunCe evaulatiou can be made by the Itcvol(y,PU.ri Rcv.Lc%v Comr:itfte, Date t 1 S Z Signature Title � G•- `�c�C� 0 ' WILl,� 'Pill "i' 1'It0(11,C'1': ..-� X 1• Create a substantittl change in ground contours? -- _.mac., Z• Create a subuta11L•inl change in existing noiao or vibration? -- x 3. Create n oubnLantial chnttge in dotnand for rnunicipal services (police, f•iro, water, sewage, etc.)? --- .X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan dosignationsl --_. ._.x„ S: Ilemovo any existing. treeal [low many? -- G. Create the need for use or disposal of poten"011y ltanardoun materials such no toxic substances, flanunablen or explosives? Explanation of any YM answers above: IM[YJllTAW.: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. above I hereby cc!rt:ity that the statements rurnished above and in t:he attached exhibi.L•n prenenh the date and inforwaL•.ion regriired for Lthin i.ni.L•ial evalunL•i.on to Llie bent of my abillLy, ,end that t:ho L'ncLn, (:LaLemonts, and inforuint•i.on Pr.(r,:m(ted are true -111(3 correct to the best of My knowledge and belief. I further understand LIIL t addi.t•ion,il inrorinaL•ion may he requirerl to be slibmlLtcrl t?ef.�re nn a(IcgunCe evaulatiou can be made by the Itcvol(y,PU.ri Rcv.Lc%v Comr:itfte, Date t 1 S Z Signature Title � G•- `�c�C� 0 TO: FROHI 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT March 12, 19eO PLANNING COMMISSION 0 JACK LAM, Director of Community Development BY: DAN COLEMAN, Junior Planner SUDJECTi ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 5130 - COHEN = Request to divide approxinu.tely .63 acres of land into three (3) parcels in the R -1 zone located on the oast side of Amethyst, between Monte Vista and 19th Street. BACKGROUND: This review is for environmental assessment to determine any significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the parcel map heroin described. To determine significant adverse impacts, an Initial Study of environmental concerns is prepared. Upon completion of that study, evidence would indicate either no significant impacts or the potential for significant adverse impacts. If a determination of no significant impact is made, based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration may be issued for the project. If significant impacts are found, then an environmental impact report shoudl be required to fully analyze the potential impacts of the project. The applicant is requesting to divide approximately .63 acres into three (3) parcels as follows: PARCEL NO. ACREAGE ,r-• 1 .21 (9,152 sq. ft.) 2 .21 (9,147 sq. ft.) 3 .21 (9,161 sq. ft.) The zoning,is R -1 which requires a 7,200 square foot minimum lot. The General Plan designatea this area low density residential, 2 to 5 units per gross acre. ENVIRONMENTAt. SETTING: Tito southern portion of the site is presently undeveloped and a single family residence is under construction on Parcel 1. Pull street improvumeatu arc buing constructed in front of Parcel 1 and will bu required at the time of development for Parcels 2 and 3. The site contains no significant vegetation. Tollowing is the adjacent land use and zoning of the site: LAND USE ZONING NORTH Single Family Residence R -1 SOUTH Single Family Residence R -1 EAST Mobile Home Park R -3 7I WEST Vacant ITEM "IV' t 1`; �i)i; Page 2 LNVIRONMRNTAL ANALYS15i Part I of tiro Initial Study Iwo been completed by tyre applicairi rurJ is attechod for your review. The environmental checklist ling been uo'apleted by atuff, and no significant advorge environmental impacta wore round. [1f_CON,MLNItA,TIONt 1lnsod upon analysis of the Initial Study, it appears that If ile,0ct wall not cause significant adverse Impacts upon the environment. If the Comndnoion concurn, than the issuance of n Negative Declaration for the project would be in order. Respectfully submitced, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JLiDCecd Attachments: Parcel Map Para' t Initial Study 1" u, 16 � 1 � ;'A t ♦�/ r1.J.1 �� }�r for r '�v ' / r J.: f 1.1Ir �. 'i � ) �•y11� , -� 1' 1, { 1 Nr , rr , 4...1 111 1 ,4 i ��� a' 1 1 �.7 e. i ��i r �'1+ o •i 1 i 1 e r: 1< � 1St i.� • I.r 1 i I rENMrlVE RCEL MAP Iii. 5150 THE C/rr orRANcm Cmmot FA CAM. A 2 " /.P. ut3 FA NAIL 1 M21 P. , .SbT' . . 9162 Sr t ~ 9,147 Sf N69°40'00"F. . 6/1' � 3 s£ �4a5 e W 150.001 7`' 163.00- I 'a. i F0.2 "1. P. ig IL it.gC /50.10' ..- 122302' E N69 °56'57 " /406.02' S. LINE OFLOr2, SLOCKB N69 057'20 "W 1405.65' GENERAL INFORMATION THERE IS A MOUSE UNDER CONS ON PARCEL I OTHERWISE THE BY AN EX /ST. AVi OENcECIV TNe EI ST1 BY A MO� E �EPAAX AND ow THE SOUTH OY ANOTIMER SINGLE FAMILY RESVENCE. PRESENT ZONING IS Rl PRQ47SED LAND USEI CONSr. OF S/NC•LE FAMILY RESIDENCES I� 0 FD. NAIL sicer OVr2 SCALC: / ", co' FEO. 1900 SURVEYOR PN /L K. MOSLEY 1053 C. ROSEWO00 CT. ONTARIO, CA. 91764 (714) 964 4M2 0 •f, CITY OV 11ANCIIO CUCANONOA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SIIEET - To be completed by applicant • Environmental Aaooaamont Raviow lion: $70.00 For all projcctn requiring envirnnmontnI review, thin form muat be completed anti submit.tod'to the Unvelopmont Rcvi0w.COmmi.t;Loe through tha doparL•mont• whore the Project application in made. Upon receipt of•thia applicaLion, the Environmental Analysis staff *ill prepare Part• II of the Initial Study. The Deva].opmcnt Itevlew COMMUL•eo will mneL• and Lake nr,Lion no Later than ton (10) days before the public mooting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of throe dot ermine C ions : 1) The project will have no onvironmontnl impact and a Negative Declaration will br filed, Z) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report: should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: N CC L- 1� i\/ke �O Q APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS. mrt.rounUr.. NAME, ADDRESS, TELE ?IiONE OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: �s ,d,Mis A< nWK 15gr LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AM) ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) �-� SIDE? O= l�,M - rt. Y r ' � LIST OTHER PERtlYTS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND rEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Y -1 9 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTTON DESCRIPTION Or PROJECTt C- �Y.% ;S ~tl.l� r=�e in;� C-v o, -r �� 1._ T �.: _ _ CAA. C� t'S-�L- - �_►�1 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANYt 2�, L� �n S F i\ RZ!I , ,f: 1 s k7.4 5 , P= ch,L > -' aN r C (J Asn& ' Lan/ saz DESCRIBE T11EIMMONME^TI'AT, SETTING ING Or Tllr PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLAWL (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE Or SURROUNDING PROPERTIrS, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY . EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHRETS)t L" Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? I • li I Il w )''W;h1. PII1 ii �Itt) II_CI�IS YI M 1 NO Create a substantial change in ground. contours? 2. Create a substnnt'inl chango in existi:uJ noiso or vibration? 3. Create n uubaLanLial chango in domand for municipal services (police, fire, water., aowago, etc.)! v A. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designational 5: Remove any existing travel 11ow many? �6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hay. ardour, materials auch as toxic substances, £iammablos or explosives? Explanation of any Yrs answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the f next page. I � �II I' 9 0 CERT.IPICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand tla t additional information may he required to be submitted before an adequate evaulat•ion can be made by the Devvlorment Review Committee. Date_ E 2& '7 / y�� Signature = +�'t� -C�_db Title 0 CITY OF RANCHO CIICPMONOA 0 STAFF REPORT 1;1 Y�1 DATEI Marc.. 120 1900 TOt PLANNING COMMISSION PROM: JACK LAM, Director of Community Dovolopment BY: DAN COIXMAN , Junior Planner e'. SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR PARCHI, MAY NO. 5922 - Request to divide approximately 1.9 acres of land into four parcels in the R -1 zone located on the onst aide of Josper, south of 19th Street. BACKGROUNDt Thin review is for onvironmental assessment to dntermine any nignificant adverse impacts on the environment an a result of the Parcel Map hur.ain described. To datermine significant adverse impacts, an Initial Study of environmental concerns is prepared. Upon completion of that study, evidence would indicate either no significant impacts or the potential for significant adverse impacts. If a determination of no significant impact in made, bnsod upon the Iuitinl Study, than a Negative Declaration may be issued for the �,. project. If significant impacts are found, than an environmental impact report should be required to fully analyze the potential impacts of the project. The applicant is requesting to divide apprexi.mdtely 1.9 acres into four (4) parcolo with the smallest parcel being approximatuly 11,500 square feet. Tho zoning is R -1 which requires a 7,200 square foot minimum lot. The General Plan designates thin area sit low density residential, 2 to 5 units per groat. acre. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGI The site is presently undeveloped and contains no significant vegetation. The applicant will be required to inotaii full street improvements for the proposed cul -de -sac, Gala Avenue, and to construct curbs and gutters along Jasper Avenue. Following is the adjacent land use and zoning of the site: ?. LAND USE ZONING 4 NORTH 19th Street R -1 - 8,500 -T SOUTH Single Family Residence R -1 EAST Single Family Residence R -1 tigr WEST Single Family Residence A -1 r1 LJ ENVIRONMENTAL AI..LYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and i•, attached for your review. The environmental checklist has been completed by •,Cnff, and no significant adverse environmental impacts were found. ITEM uCa J w — 11 LOCATION MAP 191h 0 .1 1 4, TENTATIVE MAP RARCE/L MAP 5922 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 111.1 emoolJ1tl11 1 MDw w V 1 fort w. war/ wwu wlsullr. wmm to 11w 1 two N w 1, 1. www w W Iwr M will IYw I WM1W w111 W wlll1111 W futlwsr w f1i1 w1w.1.r. .y ■1.11. 1 1IN1i 11w1 / Mw. A" LAIN 1IW. tiiwl Nil" vow I11M ft. Nil M 1•IW. K, 111 $ft. wM /"•Y 1 111" a 1 /. 11tW wnu 111. fur r.lw to 11.11104 1% W wn 1 11•�r 11 r1U•N Woo %W. lvr w•r11.11 III Iflll 1w 1111 11y1�y1 �I MIAMI I11lnp 1, IM1 w — 11 LOCATION MAP 191h 0 .1 1 4, TENTATIVE MAP RARCE/L MAP 5922 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 111.1 emoolJ1tl11 1 MDw w V 1 fort w. war/ wwu wlsullr. wmm to 11w 1 two N w 1, 1. www w W Iwr M will IYw I WM1W w111 W wlll1111 W futlwsr w f1i1 w1w.1.r. .y ■1.11. 1 1IN1i 11w1 / Mw. A" LAIN 1IW. tiiwl Nil" vow I11M ft. Nil M 1•IW. K, 111 $ft. wM /"•Y 1 111" a 1 1.0 1 . fur r.lw to 11.11104 1% Iw/11w 11 111w111 w. lvr w•r11.11 MY 1M'MI 11y1�y1 �I MIAMI IV�w" /1MI 1rILL1 w10wIw. r1 Street– — Q •I 3 4 `" 4% J! n •• .�. ..., a •:,J I .. .... .1— Not a Part .._.. _... .—_. 9038 1 -.- '1Q T,►J ,j I126/'82,33� ` I ,� MB I FES , I w.. Mf•. . 1 /-- 1//° rua ww"WlA. " GAL'. - - -. AVE ,NUE�_ Jw" 0 I I Q •I 3 4 `" 9038 1 -.- '1Q T,►J ,j I126/'82,33� ` I ,� MB I FES , I 0 I I it � 1,1 I 1 1 I I / LI 1 I, •1 � 1. "i Lr 1 ; ilr 1 ( �. 1 1 '.,u I 1 _i y. 1.. 1 I i 1 ` � 1 1 irl� 1 1 iil 11 +1111 I �� vf•�..!, 211111111 �rl " 111 II I i� 11.1 �1 �1 11 �• 1 � r 1 -" 1 l) 1 1.f 1• pp11 I^ 1 r 1 1 11�• 11.1 11 1 1� , 1• 1 ` 1 I 1 11' J 1ji 1 I,1 1 I '.1' 11 1 1 1 I 1 1 I' I I I11), f1 1 II• I1 1 / I.. 1 11 11. 1 Im 59 Ire Palle l it ii 11 1.• f 111 ���l 'I •1f �1�111�11'1 1111 1�11P 1 III; ' 11,• •.II X11 • I III �• I 1 , 1 Boned upon atinlynin 1 11, X11' Initial project 1 1 \ 1 1 1' 1, 1 1• • 1 f t f 1 I 1 \ •1 1 1•, lie 11 `11 • 1 environment. , �. 11 ilp cncurst, titan the isduntica of n Nogntive Declaration for the project would be In order. ROGPOctfully 111 �f •..; i. JACK LMI# .I 1 •I 1 � 11 ' 111 l lr „IJ I 1 b Director of Cctmnunity DevolopmGnt 11.111 1� I JL:DCtcd it Attacil,tantat Parcel 1 1'l I�,dll.• J ''1 Part Initial 1i ' 1,1 (I• '•� 111. �1,r 111�I1i1 II 1•.l 11 • 1 1 •1 •.1 1�,� •1�1�1. 1•' I� ' yl 1, rr11 11 I r• ,•i LI 'll 1'•1 �. , .1 y...1 •��y Ind 11,1����1� 1 f Al 1 1 11.1. I II II � � 1 1,.�1• ,.1. . 1' 11'','1•.IY •.:A 1 r 1 r V 1 I 1 1 IY 1 1 '1•Ir � I 11 1 f Yj •'•1111 f 1• J 1i• t frl •..1. III I�• X11, �\. f.. �'•,. 14 w t� .alt 7 '1 .•.Lrl••. .Hi•«i 1.11, 1111;, 1.1: 1 • t 1 , 1I r'•1�, 1 l .4 1 1'L 1 �1 II 1 1 1 1 `.k I •. r 1 'i••'L: 'q '� 1. t r 1. 1 1 1G, 1 i 1 i.1 ihA •1 1 I li; :111: I 1 1 111 r 1 1.: 1 _ ( 11 '.It . 11 J 5:.'1 I ♦: v' .'I r'1. 1 �" i.: I 1 M l.• I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4l l�f I I I' I t��{ 1 1• I r 1 {� 1 I!f 1 I1� .1.. r �11, f t 'e IYI ry 1 i 1 11 1 l� ' 1 1. 1 1 .an J s n II I r �' 1 I1 At 1 11 11 1 wll � •I M .• 1 • 1 11 11 � •1 1 1 �1 .. . ' 1 i' 1 1 , 1 � 1 t, S .. � , + 1 � • 1 1 J', ,.t �.� I •� M r �'1 CITY OC WCIIO CUCAMODICA INITIAL, STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assostimont Roviow Foot $10.00.,, For all projsets requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Devolopmant Review Comniittoo through the department Where the Project application it made. Upon receipt of this applicat in, the Envirotunontal Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study'. The Devolopmant Review Committee will moot and take action no later than ton (10) days before the public moating at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will ma}to one of three dotorminationst 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be riled, 2) The project will have an dnvironmontal impnc!: and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: L- C1/..22;' ... "" ✓ ,2 Z 1 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE or PERSON TO t' h 7-4 ✓ 7� CONCERNI NG I THIS y !'N /•/ PROJECT: / ,"' IACATIOIZ OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCrL NO.) [5 5 zi - / 3 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: 14 S OJECT M''SCRIPTIOtr ' DLSCRIrxION Or PROJECTI All A C• ACREAGE Or PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND 'PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANYs El DESCRIBE THE - MIROWERMT, SMING Or THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INMIUMTION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE Or SURROUVDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION Or ANY . EXISTING S.'RUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): �,� �'_' ✓ / ;�,l1j >'✓c� is S Cis,•, i C __. . Is the project, part of n larger proje %t, one of a serica of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? x- Z 0 WILL Tnrc PROJECT: , YI _8 O W cle 1. Create a nubritan•I:inl change in ground contours? v 2. Crcata a our -vtanLial change in existing 00iae or vibration! G 3. Create a substantial change in domand for municipal services (police, fire, water, �owage, et °. c.) 4. Crente changes in the existing zoning or �genaral plan designations T, _r/5. omove any existing trecol . now many? 6. Create the need for use, or disposal of potontinlly hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flarmnablss or explosives? explanation of any YES answers above: ,IMPORTANT: If the project involves Oic construction of reai.dential units, complete the form on the next page. CBRTIPICATIUM: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the fact!;, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the be:;t of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may ba required to be submitto before an adequate evaulation can be made by th a pr, -tit Revicnv Committee. Date F, • iydp Signatur Title ��xs. ���6 E 11 DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 12, 1900 PLANNING COMMISSION STAP'P REPORT FROM: JACK LAM, Director of Community Development BY DAN COLEMAN, Junior Planner E SUBJECT! ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 559; KTON - Request to divide approximately .G2 acres of land into t. Fp—arcels in the R -1 zone located on the north aide of Victoria Avant•.a, 500' east of Etiwanda Avenue. BACKGROUNDt Thin review in for environmental assessment to determine any r significant adversa impacts on the environment an a result of the Pnrcal Map herein doucribed. To determine significant adverse impacts, an Initial Study of environmental concerns in prepared. Upon completion of that study, evidence would indicate either no nignificrott impacts or the potential for signifi ^.not advar -3a impacts. If a determination of no significant impact in made, based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration may be issued for the project.. If significant impacts are found, then an environmental impact report should be required to l.ully analyze the potential impacts of the project. v; The applicant in requesting to divide approximately .fit acres into two equal parcels as follows: PARCEL, NO. ACREAGE 1 31 (13,409 S.F.) 2 .31 (13,409 S.F.) The zoning in R -1 which requires a 7,200 agiare foot minimum lot. The General Plan designates thin area as Windrow residential, which requires one -third acre minimum Iota. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The site is presently undeveloped and 0 -ere an: six palm trees along Victoria Avenue. Ak'ditional. dedication for street improvement purposes is required to extend paving and install curbs and gutters. Following is the adjacent land use and zoning of the site: *.AND USE 'ZONING NORTH Vacant R -1 SOUTH Single Family Residence R -L EAST WEST Single Family Residence R -1 Single Family Residence R -1 i ITEM aDn v; Pago 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of tho Initial Study lino bocci complated by the applicant and in attached for your rovi.ew. The environmental ehocklint lion bLan completed by staff and no significant adverse onvlroumuiital impacts were found. HYCOMMLNDATION: Based upon analysis of the Initial Study, it appears that the project will not couno significant advcrsa impacto upon the environment. If the Comminalon concuru, then tho issum:co of a Negative Declaration for t110 project would be in order. Iienpoetfully a omitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Dovolopmont JL:DC:cd Attachments: Parcel Map Part I Initial Study F, 1 1. p E. 0 0 FO IRON MOD _ r—: Qmic4t- 115 KP m&t OTX/NT vl sm it N. LINE OF SOUP /I / r OF LOf l3, 0!LCK I/, Mo. C/•4 44. EAS 9 W 4N o poi o PAAM l v 15,409 S.F. S PARCEL 2 �' M 13,409 S — 25' B.SL. 1353- -- 1 ---�G -- e,;r/997 S+'`,— — — i8 /rADDInomAL OEACAnov TD VICTORIA ADENU£ 4 S/IEET / OF/ IED.I /900 SCAT.el/w ^col FU 2"IP �i . A DAW til;a, M. R.R. SPIKE EAST P724.4G "� FD, SPIKE ID. NAIL VIC rQR /A AVENUE GENERAL /NFORNAWAl TIlE SITE /S FRESENTLY VACANT] BOUNDED BY VACANT PROPERTY f0 THE NORW AND SINGLE Fr1M/LY RESIDENCES ON T71E EAST AND IVES T. 7'NERE ARE SIX PALM TREES ON TINE NORTII SIDE OF VICTORIA AVE. THAT {VILL /!AVE ro BE REMOVED IF GURUS D GUTTERS ARE INSTALLED. PRESENT ZONING IS SWGL E FAMILY. 0,va . SURROUNDING) PROPOSED LAND USE /S fOR SINGLE FAMILY UT /LlT'Y NOTES WATCH. GAS AVO ELECTRICAL SERVia ARC AVAILABLF IN V/CTO7IA APENUE. SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO LL DY SEPI/C TANK AND CESSPOOL. SURVEYOR PHIL K. WSLEY Il /GNLANO AVE. '733 E R05C"L .1O Cr, ONTARIO, CA. 91764 0741 984 - 4702 Q � S/TWE,CIOR W V /C/N /T Y MAP P ?:" "'• NO SCALE 0 I 1 ' 1 DESCRIPTION Or PROJECTS ral a ACREAGZ or PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE or EXISTING AND PROPOSM BUILDINGS, IF ANY: ZY >, X52 0 DESCRIBE THE -PNVIROMIENrAr, S1- ;rTING Or THE PROJECT SITE INCLUD114G INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USu Or SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISIING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS), i Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series' of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant onvironmental'impact? h\ c, . X- 2 G. Create the need for wo or disposal of potantially hazardous materials such no toxic subotancas, flammablas or explosives? Explanation of any rS answers abovet '_.� .(� , , Fi l v— I t1� BSI 1 �% t n r. ., _tin C... i ; N• . Q -. u.... . 1. IMPORTANT. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CL•'RTIrICATION: I hereby cortiL•y that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infornmL•ion required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the factii, statements, and informaLi.on presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand thlt additional information may bo required to ho submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the nevoiopr@ent Review Committee. Date_ Signature�1t2����" Title � �, T.- 13 1 #1 NO ._._ 1. Crusts a subutnnL•inl r_hnngo in ground contours? . _ _✓ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibrationl 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal narvicas (polio, fire, water, oawago, etc.)? ._. 4. Create chnngos in tho existing zoning or general plan designations? 5: Remove an y existing tressl stow mnny7 6) �• G. Create the need for wo or disposal of potantially hazardous materials such no toxic subotancas, flammablas or explosives? Explanation of any rS answers abovet '_.� .(� , , Fi l v— I t1� BSI 1 �% t n r. ., _tin C... i ; N• . Q -. u.... . 1. IMPORTANT. If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CL•'RTIrICATION: I hereby cortiL•y that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infornmL•ion required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the factii, statements, and informaLi.on presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand thlt additional information may bo required to ho submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the nevoiopr@ent Review Committee. Date_ Signature�1t2����" Title � �, T.- 13 1 i CITY OF 1 WC110 CUCANUNCA INITIAL STUDY / ,J PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be coinplotod by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Foos $70.00 For all projects requiring onvironmontnl review, Otis form must be complaLod and aubmittod'to tho Development Review Committee through L•ho departmont• where the project application is mado. Upon receipt: of this application, the Environmontal Analysis scoff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Dovelopmant Review Committee will moot: and Lake action no lnL•or than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which Lime the project is to be heard. The Committee will mnko one of throe determinations: 1) The project will have no environmenL•al impact and a Nagative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have nn onvironmental impact add an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: TENT 7- 0eccCI. (u' \boo APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 39 L . 4�!+ ��.- 5PACE• f5, ONTAc10 C-p., !ri6,el -T l=. L 9- :SU21 :S-1 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING TIiI5 PROJECTS LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) n. °iii l'�•i .�J \2. '�A.tT._tyL_ h1�. '�.. `_'7 �i /�.1 —(n'i LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATC AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: - Y\ G r--.z, kv� c k 1,'\ i 0 DATE: MARCH 12, 1900 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT 6 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: JACK LAM, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BY: MICHAEL. VAIRIN, ASb%CIATE PLANNER SUDJL'CTt ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 00 -07 - KALBACH - ..e development o n Fete crater to a ocata oil t to eou :cost corner of Arrow and Archibald. BACKGROUND: Thin review is for environmental asseusment to datormine any significant adverse impacts on the environment an n renult of this Project . Site and architectural design is not considered unless it's related to environmental concerns. To determine significant adverse impacts, an Initial Study of environ- ®mental concerns is prepared. Upon completion of that study, evidence would indicate either no significant impacts or thte potential for significant adverse impacts. If • determination of no significant impact is made, based upon the Initial Study, then • Negative Declaration may be issued for the project. If significant impacts are found, then an environmental impact report should be required to fully analyze ti:e potential impacts of the project. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The applicant is proposing to construct two (2) retail buildings totalling 10,250 square feet on 1.26 acres of land located adjacent to a Jack -in- the -Box Restaurant or the southeast corner of Archibald and Arrow. Following is the adjaeient land use and zoning of the site. LAND USE ZONING NORTH Single Family Residence R -3 SOUTH Office development C -1 EAST rest food restaurant C -1 WEST Cucamonga Neighborhood Facility C -1 The subject property is presently zoned C -1 and planned as a neighborhood commercial center. The site is presently vacant and contains no significant vegetation. A recent street widening project has already provided full street improvements. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Tile environmental checklist has been completed by staff. TWO positive responses were indicated on the checklist and are described below: ITEM" V • 0 0 7-bt Tics project will chango absorption rates and the amount of surface water runoff. However, tlw project does contain full street improvemontr and n draJnage uyntom will be pro- vided thot will not impact adjacent proportion. D -c: 'the nature of the project will create a demand for nnw parking which will be totally provided within the project. MCOMMENDAyoNt Based upon analysis of the Initial Study, it appears that the project will not cause significant adverse impacts upon tLe environment. If tl:e Comuiouiun concurs, then the issuance of a Negative Declaration for the project would be in order. Respectfully submitted, a u6QL�� JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:MV:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" Site Plan Part I Initial Study 0 El-'] I '1 r'� � .�t I � i ' I " 1 1�' � 1i I 1'. 1� '.I I II 1 11 I III 1 ( II 1 I' I I ',l lltl • I L1�11 1 �l 1 1 I I I, I• i I I 11 r 1.� , 1 1' It. II 1 r� 1� , II , 1 i� ♦ l I , 1 , I, {� t 1A. 1, yl, , , 1 I, •'1 r l.,' II II ir. •I „ II G. ,''il , AI 1. t1 � I I � (I I � e �{ . 1 I 1. ' ti.• . 1 , ' I � 1'S 1 I :1 '!{I I 1 %j , III', 111 it I f I' It' r , I; '11. 1'. 1 ,. r 1 4+ 1'1.• , I I I �I,, ,, '.1 1.1. •in'�� 1,I �!I .1 1 .1.111. , (, 1'Ir1j �I�+Y� I,r I�'1 �. ,1 t �I1., r�l lli, 1I • _ 1� +' 1i ��lj til �' 1'1 ' '�I I 1'I,1 �� 1 ,i t , t AI 1'' 1 Y'�1,I ,. 1 'I .r1 1� 111'8 , (A'y� 1 ).�• 1 1 1 11 �1�'iu lit ,�� 11 + ';d '�I •,I ' 1 1 1 i 11' 111 x;11 I. li r•�,1 iJ, ,I.1' d I 1 1 1 1 ' � 1 (.1 I 4 ( 1� , 1 r I• 1 L r l I ..L•I,! •A.l':111��7 "I W f Tri e 1' I , r • 41'' Lkth.Vt:Let4:r 1' 1, I 1 1 � M ►. 'I 'l! 1.1 i 11 1 ' �I► �, Cps '�t- ,, 1�: •• ' rl 1 I r Ir; �. I VMIMiMMMW11W�rA�M4YIwIMi :1�I�rM,li+'rIi'�'`� r� � ,� ''' 1 all 1 11,E �� � u •!,� ;i a ,�; , '• 1�' I ; � Q ;'` . 11,.1. �' o I 1 � � I ♦ , r i! Q 1'' +I ' + .n ✓j ��1 + t 1 1 i 111 ! I, 1 �1 r tl LK J I. Y I 1 A ♦ A.�1 t, 1 r'� •, 1 ♦ I ' ,, jl 1. e 1 11 1 I 1 � ` 1 'l �i + 1.� � I t �I f41 �5 . t,l ! f ♦ ll tr I ( r� ,� 1 1 1 1 ,d) ��.: 1 � ,I( 1 ', I 7 ,1 � 1 1 1, ♦1' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL VTUDY N PART I - PROJECT INI'ORMATION SHEET - To be compleL•od by mppllcanL• Environmontal Asnosmnont Review root $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental ro,•iow, thin form must be comp3cL'od and oubmittod'to the Davelownent Review Committee through the doparLmont where the project apillicaL•ion in made. Upon receipt of .thin application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial study'. The Development Review Committee will mocL- and take action no later than Lon (10) days before the public meeting at which Limo the project in to be hoard. The Committee will mako ono of throe determinations: 1) Tho project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaratior/ will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concovning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: _Arrow Plaza APPLICAIZT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED CONCERNING TtiIu PROJECT: own as_ above, or Alan Snapp, Architect 4421 ilexmuda Cir�lo, Irvin, CA 92714 (714) 542 -7257 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSES30R PARCEL NO.) A;nnrw Nigh-my nnA Archihild ( thea9t Corner) and 7()4 n4 190 LIST. OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE: AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND TUE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: none 0 , V ,7rCP DESCRIPTION DL *6CRII>TIODI OF PROJEC'I's 7Wo catmtrcinl hul,adlnane nlong with ACMAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SpuARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF'ANYs nM.• buildiM areat 10,250 tut• f _ si , •, i.26 uuLuu DESCRIBE TIIE-ENVIRONDIENI'AT, Si:'I'TING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND TILE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS)'t Rqv� mti jrw- eymnn dhrne- t nnf fhn ,prnJnr--H nmMin mixod o mm=411L 01 ® appaYent, oxcropt far rofenmcos to traditional Spnn sh and tern for C il M t -in -the Sox, wnicn sits on an aa)acent parcel Wniun waa origvuuiy 0 to 0 tho iT2MI12I- p1laso. I Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? DIa Y x -2 6 M1111 11 it,rr� � Plmarm Cratato a substantial change in ground contours? X _ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noiso or vibration? 3• Create a substantial chango iii demand for municipal servicon (polico, fire, wator, aewaga, atc.)? _X 4. create changes in the existing zoning or general Plan dcoignntions? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? G. Create the need for use or dinponal of Potentially hazardouil materials suclt as toxic substances, flammablos or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers abovo: XMPO_ RTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page, CERTIPICATIO N: I hereby certiJiy that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibitu present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, rtaLemrnts, a:�d information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand tint additional information may bt., required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the DeveLn11rant Review Convaittee. Date February 7, ]980 Signal Title a 0 C�J .M1 i CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: March 12, 1900 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Cywui+lty Development �,-- oulota Pla �Uy Mlchaol Valrin, 4sa r .,__i� SUBJECT: ZONE C11ANU)r NO `OD=0 r VIRONNENTAL ASSESSMENT JOHN ISAACS - A request est for' o�ange o n rom - o- 9 located at the northwest corner o ,ro -kin nn East Avenue RELATED ITEMS: )Director Review No. 80 -05 and Minor Deviation No. 00 -02 BACKGROUND: Mr. John Isaacs has requested a Change of Zone for approximately !—.F5 ecru of land located at the northwest corner of Base Line and East Avenue (Exhibit "A ") . The subject property is presently zoned R -I (Single family residential) and the applicant has requested a Change of Zone to C -2 (service commercial). The applicant Is requesting the zone change to allow for the development of a service station center. (That site plan Is being presented to the Planning Commission for their review iater on In this agenda.) ANALYSIS: As can be seen from the location map, the subject property is hounded on all sides by roadways and the Freeway off -ramp. Exhibit "B" and "C" Indicates existing adjacent land use and zoning whIlch s des c1loed as follows: `I`I 1r1e�A � ZONING NCRTH Vacant R-I SOU.11 Vacant R-) EAST Vacant R-1 WEST Greenhouses R -1 Exhibit "D" displays the General Plan for the area. is planned For service commercial uses. The subject property ITIN "F" 0 Planning Conmisslon March 12, 1900 Page 2 Ilia subject property Is largo enough to accommodate uses permitted In the C -2 Zone and such uses would be compatible given the location and situation of the project sito, In addition, tiro request Is consistont with the Interim Lund Use Element of the City General Plan, The Initial Study has boon prepared for the environmental assessment of this zone change. AttacNod Is Part I of the Initial Study as provided by tiro applicant, The environmental checklist was completed by Staff with no positive responses to any of the Items; thus, loading to tiro finding of no adverse impacts as a result of the project. If, after review of the Initial Study, the Commission finds the environmental assessment to be adequate, then the Issuance of a Negative Declaration would be In order. CORRESP0NCEt A notice of Public Hearing was published In the Dally Report aga11DEr od section on iebruory 29, 1980. In addition, notices of Public Hearing wore sent to all property owners within 300 fact of tiro subject property. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: If after review of the information pr•osented haroin and at the eoncluslon of the Public Hecring, the Comnission concurs with the applicant's requests, the appropriate action would be to recom- mend approval to the City Council of Zone Change 80 -1 as described on the attached resolution In addition to recomaandatlon of the issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respectfully. submitted, „ Jack Lam, D i rector oT Community Davulopment JL:MV:kds Attachments: L•xhiblt "A" Location Map Exhibit "0" Existing Lind Use Exhibic "C" Existing Zoning Exhibit "0" General plan designation OR I J L11 --I 'J: L 01, k k Ilk OR I J L11 --I 'J: L 01, Ilk OR I J L11 --I 'J: L 01, I I J) 1 � 1 I I'� " 1 I• I Y RAILROAD ,I ' 1' ,:I ,•'111. 1 jl 1 I 11 I I� Vacant 1 I« r I � I , � l �lpiirw ■�� ♦ 19OBJECT PROPFFTI CLA LINE d' 1 1 , 71 1: . • � 1 r (1 I I t } � � a .I �, I+ 1 1�; .. 1, J .P ♦ 1+`� 1 i ,i 11 17 1 ¢ 11/ , , 1'f r I l ( 1 Y� , ♦ 1' 11 11 �1 1 }� s • �l 1 r f� e °� 1 1 I 1 11 141 1 ! '�f 1. Y 1 1 I Iii 1 ,I �4 1 li,l V I• 1 , 'L �l 1 ' 11. .1, 1 1' �I 1, t � i✓' \� 1 lip I. J J il• I U. 1 W rl 1 1: I 1 I' 1 11 I A '' •I.I, I'1 1 I 1' �: II , I'. '4�''• 1 'I1 ', ( !:1 ' III i.)j 111 1' 1, 1 rl ' '„ '�!1 • i 1 1 � 1' .: � ::,. 1 )� 1 1 +'1� ' 1 I I, 1 1 "1 (1 , 1. P 1' i 'll•1 I v' 1 ♦ ,, 1 1� I I 1 �: 1 f r' I �,1 P /,: 11� I � I'': �� 1 �, 1 1'� 1 r 1 ( ' U, .111', ',1 I r Ili • L � � r, ��.II I,,,i 1 ,, 1. MILROAD ''( RIO I I 1 ,i� '; ;' i ,•'r PROPERY E;ks-F. LING ' I^ 1 1 r 1 1 I j51 �f + :w s.' 1 . r r N&-IO NO r IL IOWNry r 1 1 1 11 1 I V L:1 �r F 1 r f ��, r ,. • r� ' 1 /II �� r �l1 + r: ti 1 I,y � ' / . \'I•• I 1 y. I� 1, 1 + r 1 11 I 1 �•+ y 1 ''a ,� 1 1 i , II 1. lar It 1 10 od • I k, 0, k I k, k k k . it tj ol 4! htt.i ®, r CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONOA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To bo completed by applicant Environmental Asnonamont Roviow Feae: $70,00 For all projocts requiring environmental roviow, thin form must be completed and submitted to the Development Roviow Committee through the dnpartment Where the project application iu made. Upon receipt of,thie application, the Environmental An"lynia staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Davalopmant P4virw CommiL•too will moot and toko action no later tLan ton (10) day;, before the public mueting at which time the project is to be hoard. The Committeo will make one of three doterminatione: 1) The project will have na environmental impact and a Nagntivo Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLES Service Station Center for Mr. .lohn Isaacs APPLICANT'S MIME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Mr. Jphu Innnen`_� 8687 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91770 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: 'ion, 3938 Wilshire Boulevard OF PERSON TO DE CONTACTED Los Anrelas 'LOCATIUN OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ,ASSESSOR PARCEL 110.) Attscssnr Pnrccl. No. 227 - 131 -4R _ N.W. corner orner of Baseline Read and East Avenue LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND' FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Local Isuildinn Permit I11 '1 it olik , 1111 1j 1'C .1 k 11 .0 YI i,11i ,11'1111 Nlj ki I •� 17 '11')j . 1111 JI",c•PI ' (��, _ n. 1. Crento a oubritantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a nubotantitil change in existing .�. .r.� noise or vibrationl 3. Create a oubotantial change in demand for municipal nervicon (police, fire, water, sewage, etc•.): A. Create changer: in the existing zoning or general plan dosignationsl X 5: namovo any rxisting tr000l Clow many? IS X S. Create the need £oz• use or diopooal of poleentially hazardous materials such no toxic substancos, flommabloo or explosives? Explanation of any YER anower7 above: J. Suraiiciu normally aauoulated with commercial uae. -.. n uuuq�c a.o a..ruwwaa. an.. mn.a au ua.a.ara uuua: a: wi. a.0 Iycua:a u.a pauu. num cr O YCCP will e removed, ho wever are to a replaced y hem nithler trecn of uizo and variety more appropriate to the development. IMPORTANT: If the 'groject involves the construction of rosidential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and ?.n the att achad exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the boot of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the beat of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information mmy be required to be submitted before on adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date_ . y Signr�ure - Title Tom )lung Project Architect 1 -� ' Ill/ 1 I Ill/ 1 • Slllils't' II'l , The.oito of appeoxlmntely 2.05 ncros opened routo from the San hornnrdino flint torrnin in currently in n rural yet undeveloped. 'Ilia rear of tho al curving lino. Tito front and aide of Snualina Road and Last Avenue. lu freeway orlontod to thu newly Freeway to U rntow. Vic unuontinlly netting with adjoining nroporties an to adjoins Cite freowny off ramp in a Lite site forms tha N.W. eornor of Tito uita in at nubotnntial distance from other cotumorcinl dovolopmont on those ntreato, however, future development Piny be nuticipated duo to free• - wny accuse and related commercial development. Some nntive L'ucnlyptus trees are currently locntod on the site, costa of which will be Paved in the development and or ropincod with now trees of npproprinto site and upecien. Tito site in itself has no special historical nignifiennco and on spacial animal•llnbitat other than small rodents nod other local typical. upociea. 0 t 0 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 00-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLAN14ING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CtIANGE NO. 00 -01 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R -I TO C -2 FOR 2.05 ACRES LOCATED 011 THE NOR'riIWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND EAST AVENUE - ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 227 - 131 -40 1 WHEREAS, on the 25th day of January, 1900, an application was filed and accepted an the above- dostribod project; and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of March, 1980, the Planning Commission hold a duly advertised public hearing , iursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commisslon has made the following flndings: I. That the subject property is suitable for.the uses permitted In the proposed zone In terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use In the surrounding area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have signifi- cant Impact on the environment nor the surround- Ing properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that t this project will not create a significant adverse Impact on the environment and recommends Issuance of a Negative Declaration on March 12, 1980. i' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 12th day of March, 1980, Zone Change No. 80 -01. • 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that Sl the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 80 -01. 1 N �t r1 LJ 3. That a Cortlrlod Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Comtnleslon shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12711 DAY 14ARCH, 1900 PLANNING COMMISSION OF 711E CITY OF RANCHO Ci1CAKONGA. Byt Orman kempo l , i airman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Conrn ss on I, JACK LAM, Secretory of the Planning Comnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly Introduced, passed, and adopted by the Plarning Comnlsslon of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hold on the 12th day of March, 1900, by the following vote, to wits AYESt COMMISSIONERS: NOESt COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS J 0 DATE: TO: ]FROM t DY$ SUDJLPCTt CITY OP IIANCIIO CUCAMONGA STAFF KEPOIIT March 12, 1900 PLANNING COMMISSION JACK L&Wo Director of Community BARRY K. IIOOAN, Senior lllnnnai� - DevolopmaUt o 0 cone Co. BACKGROUND: The public hearing for thin itim was continued from the Pobrunry 27th mooting to this meeting- Since that meeting, the City Attorney comments have been received relative to t}te ordinance and Chore line not been sufficient time to review and incorporate such coawents. In addition, tl:e recant Planning Commission Conference provided name ,additional idena which ataff would like to review end possibly incorporate into the ordinance. We will continue working on the ordinance and hopefully hove a corrected ordinance available at the night of the mooting. llowaver, since the ordinance will not be distributed until that time, action by the Commission would not be recommended until ttte following mooting of 11arch 26, 1900. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the public hearing for this Zoning Ordinance Amendment ba continued to the March 269 1900 Planning Commission meeting. ossppect�ful y submitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:DKN :cd I ITDI "C" 0 n U DATE: TOt FROM: BYt SUBJECT: 4 CITY OF 11ANC Stuff March 12, 1900 Planning Commission Jack Lam, Director of Community Dovoloptnont Michael Valrin, Assoclato Planner Request by Ilenry :lolte. r for use of flags for the Industrial leasing office locdted on the southwest corner of Arrow ,and Archibald DACKGROUNDt As the Commission will recall, this request was first sent to tie Comm scion at its lost mooting of February 27, 1980. The final decision on the request was continued to this meeting to allow the applicant time to prepare additional informatlon and materials to indicate a more precise use of the flags and alternatl%o loosing methods. To date, the applicant has not provided any additional information for the Commission's review. The applicant has placed the flags back on the property without approval of thn City. The Planning Division Staff has worked extensively with Mr. Reiter In developing a signing program on both Arrow and Archibald Indicating the location of the Industrial leasing office. Those signs are visible from both street frontages and act as a guide to direct traffic into the project and to the office. It appears as though Mr. Reiter is putting the City In a position to doter - mine what leasing methods should be used to have his building leased in a viable manner. Obviously, It Is not the City's position to determine dif- ferent leasing methods for a project. There are many other projects of this nature throughout the City who are experiencing a slow down In the leasing of Industrial space but have not resorted to the use of flags or requesting the City to determine how to lease the buildings. The Sign Ordinance specifically prohibits the use of banners, flags, pennants, and balloons except for use in conjunction with special events which Is defined as activities or ovents such as grand openings and charitable events and are permitted for a maximum of 45 days per calendar year. Leasing of buildings Is not considered a special event and therefore will not qualify for use of flags. RECOMMENDATION: It appears that further delay and review of this request will not provide any further information that would substantiate the use of ITE21 "1!" e Nr' 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Stuff Report DATE: March 12, 1980 TO: Planning Commisslon FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development BY: Michael Valrin, Associate Planner SUCJECT: DIRECTOI REVIEW 110. 80 -05 AN_D_ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT - 0 CS - Review of daVolopment of plans for a snry co ,station cantor proposed at the northwest corner of Base Lino and East Avenue. RELATED ITEMS: Zone Change No. 00 -01 and Minor Deviation No. 80 -02. BACKGROUND: In conjunction with Mr. Isaacs' requent for a Change of Zeno on Uiio abova - deserlbed property, which Is listed previous to this Item on the agonda, site development plans have been submitted for review and consideration by the Planning Commission for the development of a service station center on the subject pproperty (Exhibit "1"). As can be neon from the site plan (Exhibit "D' , the development clan Indl- cates three different structures; a convenience market and bothroom facilities, a combined gasoline service Island and retail area for tires and batteries, and a service garage. The applicant's intentions are to provide a development which would cater to freeway traffic from Interstate 15. It should be noted that any approval considered by the Plannirg Commission for the development of the site Is co.tingent upon final approval of the zone change by City Council. In addition, the configuration and placement of the buildings on the development plan assumes approval of the Minor Deviation which should be presented con- currently. ANALYSIS: The findings. required to be made for Director Review in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance require that the Planning Commission find the site adequate In size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and the specific development thereof. In addition, the Commission must find that adequate Improvements will be installed in the appropriate manner and In conformance with the adopted standards and policies. The finding of odequnte size and shape can be made if the Planning Commission determines that a Minor Deviation is warranted for the required setback from the freeway right -of -way. Presently, the Zoning Ordinanre requires a 15 foot setback from freeway rights -of -way. The project site is bounded on the north by the Interstate 15 off -rnmp which contains a largo right -of- way area. The area between the physical improvements of the off -ramp and ITEIi "I" I. 1�( + I v'I I If 1 I Il I ,u ,I II rl' I m n I� d f yl. ". 1. } �1 iI y I � ,t + ., � r I l l ll'1 'r 1 11 �' .'1.. I , 1 a►�' +,+ 7 � r� , r , I r'•� f � 1 � � , .� I , I�11� J 1,1 .1 " LI {,I ` ( 1 r ) I ' + // i 1 I it 1'�A l•� Yi�� ,r �i ` � I jS '/ " ,,: i', �„f'.�1•a � ", ! ., Ii, C•,• 1.r rr « 4f i '� �r r Planning Consnlsslon March 12, I900 Pago 2 the north property Ilna of subject property range from 35 foot to over 40 foot. The existing off -ramp constralnes the amount of land ovallnble and creates an unusual shaped lot. Further, setbacks from the riplit -of- way could create design restrictions for the development of the slte. All street Improvements and storm drain foci Iftles will be Installed in accordance with the Master Plan of highways and will be Improved In accordance with adopted standards and policies. Access to the alto wlII be provided by one driveway from Base Line Road and one driveway from East Avenual the proposal moots the adopted Planning Commission Access Policy. Parking on the site Is provided in accordance with the zoning ordinance standards. A portion of the parking area adjacent to the west side of the aviary to the north side of the site is awkward and con- strained. It is racomnended that two of these parking spaces be eliminated and be landscaped ur used as a small picnic area. Thla revision Is shown on the attached site plan (Exhibit "C "). The aviary is provided as an attraction and feature to the site. Exhibit 110" Indicates the exterior building elevations and the proposed architecture of the project. Colured renderings and a material board will be provided at the Planning Commisslon meeting and will be on display In the Planning division office prior to the meeting. The design proposes to use the combination of materials such as brick, stucco, wood shingles, tinted glass and alumlrum mullions. Extensive mounded landscaping is being provided along Base Lino and East Avenue in addition to landscaping In the interior of the project. A detailed landscaping and Irrigation plan will be required to be prepared prior to issuance of building permits. In conjunction with the zone change, an Initial Study has been prepared to assess the environmental considerations of the project. Part I of the Initial Study prepared by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed the environmental checklist which Indicates that the physical improvements of the site will add additional traffic and surface water runoff. However, the significance of these two Items is mitigated by the requirements of total improvements of the streets and an appro- priate drainage system provided. Based upon the Initial Study, it appears that the project will rot create any significant advurso impacts upon the environment. If the Commission concurs with such a finding after review - ing the Initial Study, then the Issuance of a Negative Declaration for this project would be in order. RECOMMEi4DATION: Prior to consideration of this item, the Planning Commission must decide whether or not the Minor Deviation for this project is Justified. If the r ICI , � II II 't l Ir �•Ar 1 11 1, Community Devolo 1 Attachments: Ex Ex Ex I1 I d I: ' f�•11 Pa II is �� •I : �yi' 1 • 1 11� ,1 '1�: 11, L r 1 1 I ' '1 111 t•i "��Ij ljh,l �' +` , ��. alp'." rl�•���'1,:1 I, X4.1 ,• '1'li . .Y 1''a• 1 1 Y` 1 ' .1 .'. 1 •, \, :, 1 -1.11 11 n 1 1 f ' 1 Y„ •1 \, ,({I ' Ill'. 1 1 �1'I •. -1 1 t 1 I (•�� 4 ' ,{ ��1 � �tl � 1, • ! i ':l, • ' ♦ +C t I+ '�1 t ,1 ,i '' 1t 1.'; 1 +' 1 1 I~- 1 a , 1.+ 1 1 r; �. 1+ ' 'i •�' . +'; �'' ,�' '.L.1 ' , % r}rt , 1 1 'v ♦ .. r r , r 1 r 1 1 � .• J1 i, Y ! + •1 1 I 1' Ii J Jack ' .1 .'. 1 •, \, :, 1 -1.11 11 n 1 1 f ' 1 Y„ •1 \, ,({I ' Ill'. 1 1 �1'I •. -1 1 t 1 I (•�� 4 ' ,{ ��1 � �tl � 1, • ! i ':l, • ' ♦ +C t I+ '�1 t ,1 ,i '' 1t 1.'; 1 +' 1 1 I~- 1 a , 1.+ 1 1 r; �. 1+ ' 'i •�' . +'; �'' ,�' '.L.1 ' , % r}rt , 1 1 'v ♦ .. r r , r 1 r 1 1 � .• J1 i, Y ! + •1 1 I 1' r , r 1 r 1 1 � .• J1 i, Y ! + •1 1 I 1' k :k k k I vp f to to p II nn 1 kk to n r /?'.G 1w 1. 11 1 rl A I or 1, 1 � 1 " k ' 1 I 11' 1 1 I I I �• , 1 1 11 I' , I �, I I I jl , ' 1' I I i, fl •�' d I , 11;' ''� ��, 1 ., I ^,�. I '',1 1 \1,.� ' �'f1' 1 i " I if. I �.1 I I,I I I ,1 \ ,I �� � • I • I `1,' 1 1 'll� �1 'll ' 1 !.'I.. ,J ' / IVtI. ,' '',I 11��1 r, ,l!/ I 1 I !1f 1 1 1 I Ili I I If 1 I 1 � 1 11� I• ly 1 f 1 I ,' � , �I�. ' I I S �1 I 1 A •�� 1 �` I! I� I 1 t 1 I ` � ' 11' 1 '1 ,�r� I �1 rl', , I', 1 Vii' • 1'j 1' , � 1 I d �. 1 � \' ', f f I' 1N I 1 i l, i 1' I `\ ` f '. , I, i. 11 i 1 I 11' V , ;III I ;! �, 1 `''': 1' l 'y , 1, I � �. • ', � �I' I .Its I�f ' INS 1p • ,•11 It • 1��ai 'ICI �'�.•i � ' .'� {+ ( s ," nom, t I. '� �r�j,l +f'.• � .��•I�,�>. Vii: I � �,'I,II,;i� }'�!;;; I: I r i •v I V , . 1 I 1:� ' � v � 1 `I I f'1 1 ..l \ ` ICI .1_I. � \`I r ,l pr I 11, � ' !'I,4 , ` C 1 , , I, �. ,1 t I I'. ' i �• , V:I 11• 1,��1 {.1 (,I P. f� "i ,I h. 1 t' i M '� •, {. y I •IJ t ,�. /�b.> Sa �� ' ,1•/� >, i iT r � , , � t 1 „1 i! ' , > � 1 ' • •11 �w f� 'v A 1 A �' I ..,, t I ..j Y • f , .F �i , 'A �' yl .•lY �'t'a�l> Sfj'' t � a, , s�. rl alt q� 1 trK i t• 11 , 'I 7a.� I .. t >I •,1 t \I \. r,l! � t \ r t • 11 � r ,' i' \'�i ' �; N� \ � �. y.' • rI vfl > v + 1, � ,t ti t. •Ii �. tt y.^ , ( 1 t 4 1 �'„ , • � 1 ,A ` +T' I f / �l �{ , I ,l: ' 1 e , 1 t 2i IM 11 +. /b � Iii 071 RnNNAV uvM- --_tl_. i•e � oSl • / �''' 111\ 1 �1,, � ' �` � f 1 ,+ �'•'� ti , , �, ��� ., jai' �1 E �� I , I � tau ExHtWr a w f r + 11 r ' ,`I 1 I• ' 1`1 1 ' 1 1 1 ` ,. ' f � ' 1,.. ,', I! 1 ' 1jf 1 •I I _I� 1• Y I I11, I I, rd, 1, 111 'I � '(I� ,1,,I' ♦•a �1 1'',• ,1 I1 1 ',� 1 +Ij '1� li. a ,i 1. , I "I n '�1 , , ', r t1�.i�� 1 11� 1� IIli 1', I 1 � V 'I'' .1 ( 11' ..l' ( 1 1 'r 11 '1i , 111• 11 .11 1 1� I i1„ II �j��l IrI �141r' 1•`I 1 � i I 1 � .'� II' �p �I '�1 i � I P.,�'llll I'I�1,� IA � I '.�Lrl .11 ' 11 �,`,IM �1 ,�� •I r I 1 1'It �� •♦ ' �1 111 • H ' , 1 .' 'll 1,11 1 1 1 1 1' 1 � 1 I I I 1 1. f ' 1� 11 � 1 , I r' : 1 r , 1 1 I 1♦1 � A �� ' 1 1 ���' I 1' 1 r � � 1 '.f , 1,tf II '1 •1 i (" 1 11 , 1 1.1 ' �a'y 11 alt V �ll 1 1� 1 I(', "� ' t'. '; I f 11 ,� 1 1, • /•dl ' ` '.1 P 1. ,n 1j1 �I(' rl �.I! 1 '�1 i 1 1 ,i� I\ 1 , ! 1 (' 1117 �I I .'111 1 II 1 t '�VI � •I 11 s�'1. 1 a} I 1�( I, 11,1 11r. ,,1 1; 1;•i a 1 � f I 1 11 1 ,1 '• L , 1, 1i� 1�[j1(! t1 ,tr�la 1.♦ 11 i1�1j� q1;/ L,1 1�•;�:� \� 1 �,�. �� 11 11+f 1 , 1 I - •,a•.r + . �+ � {1 IJ' +' f' ih1 I %J ! 1 1 It All MOO i � 1' t ,11 J a.�l 'Lj�ll�.•1 � � � 1 J ' I. 1 il. i,� it �' \ , • ^ �'1 I' 14 I �. :�.J � IY,�'/[f•1 • 1 '�, � �{ 11 I 11 ' • 1 I 11 + ' I• r ; 1 h + }II ��Ylnn� I� fr *I A 1, 11.'' + (�Al� ,� 1 y ♦�1 1 1 1 ✓'. It �f ° ' � � � � {u1 Iet�l �. 11 ,,.N 111 V1l I 1• I' ' 1 r, I j' • J. r•lIM:1 II 1 ,S r I + +I i f • r � r ..• • � � , jr + o.,a , . K 1 - nr � It Y 11.f11 1 �' IIIJy lil 11 1, I lr `i ,i I � � r yl ; �� /t : 111} It 1 V • '+ • �, .1 '.fi I' A• '1 iJ 1 J.,, LII �..;1 fll 1• 1 r.! • 1 +r 11�. • r 1� 1 d . r' I •� 1_•.• I r.'f. 1 , " + , •.. rl' pYf � �'.M K, , 1• 1 t , If , 1 t '; � h r 4 7 , 1 J A I r f' ` +t i.t` /tllr•, t,e.a ' tt al J 1 rA +, ,y 1 ,// r4 r.1 �' , 1,1•:1 �V� 1. !�L , +1 ;.i I '• ''�fl '' 11: r A 1rt V' Ia R}•+ I'1 '. tltfl ai� �I�ei �O \It 1w ''ij t , �1, , '�1 ' Oth v + .1 1 1 { ♦ P , I 1 i. . I J` ,. , , 1 1 .( 11 / 1!+ • 1' , t • � � 1 !f ,. �, a1w A�11�`Ir t � ri1 ftMral i, 1�.:) T ��`,_ � r 11. "T.t- I: t`'i � K V tr • j �1♦ r' ih •d 1 V. f V }, r• , .1 1 f1 y'1 Art^ , j 1 ! 1 � I 1. + + I A +J a1 r'1A • t �!A �./ , 1 a..'i {! ', S.l ' ,1 ' 1 O l.,l 1 1 1 , �, \ fl, a, 1 1 I : 3. .'F 1 ul 1 „:. .Y ♦..a ��' ..4. .... ..e.11 ,tV ,�,.y 1 ..Jl. '` 'r.. .. � .�, ... i.a:' 1 .l:'. ♦ +tlY•.. f'r .I,a. •1 .p 1, 1 01TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA INITIAL STUDY PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION 11EET — To be completed by applicant rnvironmontal Annonament Review Foos $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental rovietr, thin form must be completed and submitted to the Uavolopmant Review Committee through the department Whore the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analynis staff will proparo Part II of the Initiial Study. The Development Review Committec will moot and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project in to be hoard. The Committee will make one of three dotorminationes 1) The project will have no environmental impout and a Negative Declaration will be filod, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report ehoull.9 be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the preponed project. PROJECT TITLES Sirvice Station Center for Mr. ,iohn I9nnen APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Mr. John Isaacs 868; Basuline ;toad, Ranclio Cucamonga, California 91730 NAME, ADDRESS, TEL''ePHONE OF TrERSON TO HE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Mr, T,ym flung, Sheldon L. Pollack gaLljgra tion, 3938 Wilahire Boulevard, Los Angelen, CA 90010 (213) 383 -1212 LOCATION OF PROJCCT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOr, PARCEL NO.) Assessor Parcel No. 227 - 131 -48 _ .W. corner of Basel in Road and Last Avenue LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONA21, STATE AND FEDERAL AGrUCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PER11ITS: Local Building Permit �JtOJFCT I)PSC)UkTON DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTS sea attached 01100t #1 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY3 Approxiinately 2.85 A wan. Vacant Site. 'DESCRIBE THE ENVXR NMENTAL SETTING or THE PROJECT SITE INcTAIDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) * ANIMALS# ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASP14CTSp USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND T11E DESCRIPTION OF ANY 10CISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS), SEE ATTACIIED #2 Is the project, part of a larger project, ono of a series' of cumulative actions, which although individually smalle may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No :E- S LI; 1:.,t P� 7 4 ZW 1 t / t.n C 40 Y LI; 1:.,t P� 7 4 ZW 1 t / t.n C WUL TIITS P110,7ECTh � LQ X 1. Ciante a•aubstantial phango in ground contours? 8 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibrationl x 3. Create a substantial change iii demand for ..� municipal services (police, fire, water, sowage, ate.): X „r 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? S 5: Remove any existing troeal How many? 16 R 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials ouch as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any Yr8 answers abovos 2. Noise normally asnocinted with commercial use. 3. eery ces normally associated with commercial use. _ — c hangs to coimnerc n zones n accor-UF ce with geuo =pan'.' number of trees w be remove dl however are to be Yee a� Tee size and variety more approm..ate to the - 3t4PORTANTs If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the :orm on the next page. I'ERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnis:i.ed nbove and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the boat of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the beat of my knowledwe and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evallation can be made by the .Development Review Committee. ��Date., Sign arur,Q ` 6ol� Title ^_� Tom Hung _�� Project Architect I 11 ip Satyr 01 4 1. An automobile uorvica station center which consists of tha followings s. A 2 -story 41050 S.T. office for the service ntntirns use with part of tlio lot floor an 'fire and Buttery and Auto Accessory show room. b. A 3.000 S.F- service garage for mechanical service. c. A 4 750 S.F. convenience market and public washroom fncilitiea. d. 4 covered aorvicu islands fur gasolino PUMPS. a. An aviary area for birds display. f. Station idontlfication sign for freeway and local exposures. 'Plano of eign o1nall be submitted on later date to City for approval prior to con- struction.) g. Surface parking of 51 cars- a RESOLUTION NO. 00 -08 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCO CUCAMONGA PLANNiNo COMMISSION APPROVAL DIRECTOiI REVIEW NO. 00 -05 LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BASE LINE AND EAST AVENUE - C -2 ZONE PENDING �`y WHEREAS, on the 25th day of January, 19B0, a complete application was filed for review of the above- describad project; and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of March, 1900, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hold a meeting to consider the abova - described pro - itet NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the fo; lowing findings have been mado: 1. That the site indicated by the development plAn Is adequate in si::o and shape to accommodate the proposed use, and all yeards, spaces, walls, fences, ® parking, landscaping, loading and other features required by this section. 2. That the Improvements as indicated on the develop - ment plan are located In such a manner as to be properly role ad to existing and proposed streets and highways. 3. That the improvemonts as shown on the development plan are consistent with all adopted standards and policies as set forth in this section. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on e a env ranment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on March 12, 1980. SECTION 3: That Director Review No. 80 -05 is approved subject to the two 1— ing conditions and the attached standard conditions: Additional Planning Conditions: 1. Director Review No. 80 -05 is subject to approval of Minor Devia tior. No. 80 -02. If such Minor Devla- tion Is not granted, then the development plan is required to be redesigned to conform to zoning ordinance setback requirements and review continu ,)d ® for further review by the Planning Commission. C�tl l 1 ,l �`y i 0 6 SHUT #2 Tlie bite of approximately 2.05 acres opened route from the San Bernardino flat torrain is currently in a rurul yet undeveloped. The rear of the ai curving lino. The front and side of 0anclina !toad and Loot Avenue. In freeway oriented to the newly Fraawny to 0nrotow.' The oauentinlly notting with adjoining proportion an to adjoins tlia freeway off ramp in a the nits fotmn the N.W. corner of The alto in at substantial distance from other commercial development on thune atrooto, linwoverp future development may be anticipated duo en free- way acceus and related commercial development. Soma native Eucalyptun traor are currently located on the nits, somo of which will be savud in the levolopment and or replaced with now trace of appropriate size and species. Tho site in itself hart no spacial historical significance and no special animal habitat other than umall rodento and other local typical upociuo. 40 CJ II 0 0 2, This approval shall not be effective until a Chango,of Zone from 11 -1 to C -2 is adopted by the City Council. 3. Two parking stalls shall be eliminated as Indicated on the epprovad development 'plan, h. No outdoor vehicle storage shall be permitted on this site. Vehicle storage must be totally enclosed within the buildings. 5. Twenty percent of the the trees to be planted along the Dose Lino street frontage shall be speeimor size trees; 2b" -36" box trees. G, If the service station becomes vacant for a period of at least G months, then it shall be determined to be abandoned and the owner shall demuliah the station !' and remove the gas tauka. 7. No outdoor display ur storage of tires, towing equipment, or other accessories shoal be permitted. All auto repair muot be conducted within an enclosed building. 8. Fifty percent of the parkin area shall be shaded by trees within fiftean (15� years from completion of project. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 1980. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA By: Herman Rempo , Chalrman — - ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of tha City of Rancho Cucamonga a a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of March, 1980, by the follawing vote, to wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: iIOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS i f • PAIUM17NT OF COMMUNITY DWELOPMEWT 0 STANDARD CONDITIONS Subjects 0 LiQ_r 4o-Y Applicants 3 0 �ft y1 r' ad e� e0137 e _ Locations_ i3p!.P L%n $,_��_Z's.6Ltt A F' Those items, chocked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT T11E PLANNING DIVItIION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS$ A. site Dovolooment 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approveq sits plane on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained heroin. _ 2. Revised nits plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building parmita. 3. Approval of thin request shall not waive compliance with all soctionn of the 7.oning Cidinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Pmanit issuance. 4. The davoloper shall provide all lots with adequate aideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. S. Mail boxoe, in areas where sidowalka are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Divlsion. / 6. Traah receptacle arose shall be onclosad by a 6 foot high masonry wall �^— with view obstructing Batas pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area .:.signated by the Foothill Fire District as "hazardous$, the roof matarinls must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to 1.8suancn of a building permit. _ 9. The devoloper ahall integrato a variety of approved roof materials and colors into the design of the residential development in a manner which is both compatible and complimentary among cacti of the residential units. 9. All roof apourtanances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shioldod from view and tho sound huf.fnrnd from !tdjAcent properties and straets as required by the Plannin; and Building Di•risions. 10. Frior to any use of the project sit.e or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Co,amunity Development. 0 0. Parking and Vehicular. 1lcsene 1. All parking lot landucapod islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and ahall contnin a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. i, 2. Parking lest lights shall be a maximum height of 121 from the fintahad grade 7 of the parking surface and directed away from all property linos, adjacent stroots and rosidoncoa. /_ 3. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 13 gallon sine. T/ 4. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feat wide. 7% S. rhorgency access shall be provided , maintenance free and clear, a minimum —r— of 24 foot wide at all times during constn!ation in accordance with lroothill Fira District roquiremanta. G. All parking spaces shall be double atrippodo C. Landacnping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. A Mnotor Plan of the Existing On -Sitn Trans shall be provided to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building pormita and prior to grading to determine which trees shall be ratained. i 3. rxioting Eucalyptus troos shall be rotainud whorevor possible and shall be trimmod and topped at 300. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous troas shall be upproved for removal at the discretion of the Planning Division during the roviow of the Master Plan of Existing on -Site Troeo. Those troas which are approved for removal shall ba replaced on a treo- for -troe basis an provided by the Planning Division. 4. Street treau, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, s:,all be installed in accordance with the Mautor Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall bo planted at un average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on extariur stracta. S. A minimum of 50 tress per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the devolopmentt 209 -24" box or larger, 701 -15 gallon, and 109 -5 ge..11on. G. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condi tion, free from weeds, trash, .xnd debris. am 0 nic�nn 1. Any signs prolx) nod for thin development shall be dosignnd in conformance T with Lila Comprohonsiva Sign ordination and shall require review and approval by Lilo Planning Division prior to inatnilation of suall signs. I. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to isauainco of Z. Mcroation 1, The dovolc+por is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homac which have a private or public equestrian trail on or Adjacent to thnir property. In purchasing the Noma located on Lot__r Tract , on (date) , I have read the CC&R'a and understand that said purpose Ofballowingaegnostrianotraffic tos t gain for ® access. 8 igncd Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with tile, City prior to occupancy. r, ,dditional AnProvals Required ' 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a building "-- permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplir,:l.,d prior to recordation of the final subdivision .nap. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No, is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Varianeo /Conditional Use Permit 4. Conditional the Planning Commissionnmay add orpdelete contionst s orren which time ake the Conditional Use Permit. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION rOlt COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, C. Sitn/ Duvolopmant 1. The shall comply with the latest adop:od Uniform Building Coda, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Codo, National Electric Code, and all othor applicable codas and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of thin project. 2. Prior to iusuanco of building permits for combustible' construction, - evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill Diatriot -riro Chief that wator supply for fire protection in available. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building pormit for a now residential dwelling unit (a) or major addition to an existing unit (a), the applicant shall pay development faun at the established rate. Such foes may include, but not be limited tot City Beautification Feo, Park Feo, Drainage Poo, Systems Development Foos Permit and Plan Checking foes, and school feu. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a now commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited tot Systama Development Feo, Drainage Feo, Permit and Plan Chocking fees. S. This approval .shall become null and void if building pvrmito are not issued for this project within ona year from the data of projoot approval. 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building offical. It. Existing Structures !.. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building considering use, area and fire- rosistiveness 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply Zoning regulations for the intended use or tl 3. Existing sawage disposal facilities shall be to comply with appropriate grading practices Code for property lino clearances of existing buildings. with current Building and is building shall be demolished. removed, filled and /or capped and the Uniform Plumbing Code. I. Grading 1. Grading ct 4 of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. 4 1`t 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualifiod engineer liconand by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A goological report shall ba prepared by a qualified onginoor or rjoolugist -�, and submitted at the time of application for grading plan chock. 4. Tito final grading plan shall be subioot to review and approval by the Planning. Engineering and nuilding Divioionn and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building petinit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SIMLL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION ran COMPLIANCE" WITH THE P'O wwING CONDITIONSt J. Dodicatione and vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street riohtn -of-way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the follow:ng stroota% _ additional foot on _ additional foot on additional fact on _ 3. Cornor property lino radius will be required per City otandards.j 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and ogress from shall be dodieatad as follows% S. Reciprocal casements shall be provided ensuring accoss to all parcels over `— private roads, drives, or parking areas. X G. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, ongrbas and internal circulation of any trucks which Mall be usod for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. t. K. Street Improvements 1. Construct full street gutter, A.C. pavement, improvements including, but not limited to,and curb sidewalk, drive approaches, stroot lights on all interior streets. V,��, d�su;,Ls,d�vds, arFG�4;cf 5c;�u —: �r 0 ,, i 2. Construct the following miuoing improvements including, but not limited to: CURB a A.C. SIDE- DRIVE STREET STREET NAME OUTM11 Y VVMT. WALK APPR. LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WIIL "EL CHAIR RANDS OTHER Q4De K K K Gw v �T 4 a: Jt K x 1C K I W1 is 3. prior to any work being performed in the public .right -of -way, an encroach - mont permit and face shall be obtained from the City Enginoor'o Office, in addition to any other permits required. Y 4. street improvement plane approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. �- 5. surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guarantoeing completion of the public improvements, prior to the issuance of building permits, eh . )( G. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. L. Drainage and Flood Control K 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onaita drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. Ys_ 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: oh OAe- Web s:Ae ,!� Eas+ &V e%'k e- 0' Jr 7) AS e: (..1 „L° _ 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to floodinr/ under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of that program and City ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting shoot runoff to streets. 0 0 A S. 'Pile following north -south streets shall be designed as major wntnr cnrrying streets requiring a combination of spacial curb haightn, commer- cial typo drive approaches, rolled'stroot connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property lino: C.g %J e.. &k-4C M. utilities X 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed %indorground including litil.ities along major arterials loan than 12 RV. ^, 2. utility easements shall be provided to the specification of tt:e nerving utility companion and the City Engineer. X 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, no required. X 4. Developer., shall be rooponsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company an,* Zity standards. X S. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of tt:e Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD) , Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from CrWD will be required prior to recordation. G. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. N. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caitrans for:(ehc.rn4ee. LMrb eaJHr N �� r" YA B. County Dust Abatoment (required prior to isauanco of a grading permit) C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District _ D. Other: 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Aaeociatiun, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. N ]. Prior to racordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costa involved in District rormation.shall be borne by the developer. �_ 4. a rinal parcel and tract maps ahall coniorm to City atandards and procedures. U 16 of -Vvus ��r�er�c� uJa� ^ra�vi' sia.d y <-Iu .Q tie pvvvike (16J IN OPPI (o6vt dei t�t�u�^� tiUlted'I' dr I1a� q t:u /j?' � k heeded d, tic GiG 1£�'C�1iiZ Easl a�J Boise )4i% &W dig' e? Mhee aF f W Oro ?e tie oidu&d J a WPkiecd a 0 0 ® CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff iteport DATE: March 12, 1900 T0: Planning Commisslon L;1 FROM: Jack Lain, Director of Community Development By. Michael Volrin, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MINOR I,EVIATION NO. 00 -02 - JOHN ISAACS - Request for deviation from t.o Freeway setback requirement for the development of service station facilities proposed at the northwest corner of Base Line and East Avenue. RELATED ITEMS: Zone change No. 80 -01 and Director Review 00 -05 BACKGROUND: The Commission has already heard the request for zone change or the subject site. This Item should be heard concurrently ® with the Director Review. As has been dnscribed within the Director Review portion of the project, the site Is constrained by the construc- tion of the Interstate 15 off -romp onto Base Line. As can be soon on Exhibit "A ", the right -of -way area provided for this off -ramp is sig- nificant In addition to the area between the physical Improvements and the north property line of the subject property which ranges from the 35 feet to over 40 feet. ANALYSIS: The Zoning Ordinance requires a 25 Foot setback from freeway r g t -o -ways. To require that amount of setback for this particular property creates a significant design constraint because of the limited amount of land and the odd shape of the property. There is already a significant area between the off -ramp improvements and. the property line plus the building setback provided ranges from 10 to 30 feet. This pro- vides a minimum of 45 feet from the off -ramp improvements. There is no plan for further expansion or acquisition of right -of -way for future improvements to this off -romp to our knowledge. RECOMMENDATION: The freeway off -ramp could be considered to crento an unnecessary hardship on this property due to unusual topog:•aphy,shape or size. If the Commission concurs with such an analysis, then it is recommended that such Minor Deviation be granted. Resi ctful /y tbmitted, ® Jack Loin, Director of Community Development JL:MV:kds Attachments: Exhibit "A" site plan ITEat "J" .,o V i 0 IV u I J J Ou e Y t N E 0 t:J r', 0 WE: TO$ NItOMt SYt SUBJECTt CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONUA March 12, 1980 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JACK LAM, Director of Community Development MICIIAEL VAIRIN, Associate Planner 0 REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION ON DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -05 - LANTING- A request for a one year time extension for a previoualy approved 138 unit apartment project located on the east aide of Archibald south of 19th Street. BACKGROUND: Attached is L letter from Lanting Realtors who arc now the owners of the subject property which requests a one year extention. Tito present experation date is March 14, 1980. Tito Planning Commission recently considered a similar request from Vanguard Company for their approved apartment project. Tito Commission Rranted only a six (G) month extension to that project. The decision for the limited extension in based upon the premise that project approvals should be limited because of rapidly changing policies, atandards and land development. Addi- tionally, the City is currently in the process of preparing a now zoning Ordinance and General Plan which conceivably could create now development standards that may affect thin project, if it is not under way within G months. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon past Commission action, it is recommended that a six (G) month extension be granted for Director Review No. 79• -05. Reape fully sub fitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:MV:cd Attachment nEAL ESTATE LOANS K. 21012 NOnWALK 000LEVARD LAKEWOOD, CALIFOnN1A 00710 5 AITOR • 12131000.1200 . (71410. ^.0.0020 rebruary 15, 1980 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9320 .Vaseline Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Barry Efogan, planning department Door Sir, (.2C o� r ✓(l:1'�D I INVESTMENTS As the owners of the 10 acre parcel of land on Archibald Avenue, south of 19th Avenue, formerly owned by Mr. Ketner of Now West Comp hereby any, on which we propose to build 138 apartment units, es wish to inform you that as of now we have been unable to secure construction financing for this project. We are ppresently nogotiating with a large construction company to build It units with us through a joint venture arrangement. Your city's requirement last year was that a building permit had to. be secured prior to March 14, 1980. Obviously, we are unable to meet; i atthisatimer however, welcannotncontrolsthe economic situationein regards to financing of this project. It now looks like the near futur'6'will be. better for financing and we hereby request a one year extension for the obtaining of a building permit on our project. Yours truly, H igil 1 nd Enterprises by: Jerry J. Lanting, partner JJL /gn t� C 4/ 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 12, 1980 T0: Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development BY: Tim Doedla, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the surrounding planning area includes large, vacant undavoloped residential parcels located on hillside topography. Much of this land is located along thn northern planning boundary line of the conmunity and is designated on the Interim General Plan as "Hillside." This designation has been recognized In the draft zoning ordinance as requiring special development standards. Imple- mentation of a comprohcnsive hillside development standard is necessary with the occurrence of development in the hillside areas and with any development which may require large amounts of grading that make exten- sive changes to the existing land contours. The history of grading in many of the existing residential subdivisions within the City have exhibited lack of concern for the environment. Some situations arising from poor grading practices on hillside develop- ment include the following: Drainage and erosion problems Poor building location Poor vehicle and pedestrian access Visual eyesore The Interim General Plan "Hillside" designation requires development standards to be applied to certain hillside areas. Some hillside standards are set forth in the draft Zoning Ordinance. They include characteristics regarding grading, drainage control, planning bays for aesthetic of the cut and fill slopes. However, to appropriately plan hillside development, it is necessary for the City to consider a more comprehensive approach towards reviewing and approving any development requiring large amounts of grading, or development of steeper hillsides. A comprehensive hillside development strategy for this City would con- sider the following in creating hillside development standards: Compatible contour grading practices Building design and construction standards 0 0 Staff Report Planning Commisslon March 12, 1900 Pago 2 Landscape standards Protection of significant existing vegetation Drainage and runoff cons idaralivns View access from and to the project nito Roadway design standards Fire protection Open space and development Interface Those features would comprise the basis of hillsido development standards. Consideration of the hitlsido development standards will coincide wall with the completion of the General Plan and Ur-:)on Design element of the City. Methods for Implementation of the Hillside Development standards can be' accomplished through amending the zoning ordinance, establishing specific standards to be employed by the Grading Ordinanra and possibly creating Residential Design Guldalinos. Once complete, this Information will be brought before the Zoning Ordinance Committee and the Planning Commission for their review and approval prior to City Council adoption. Ultimately, these approved development standards will be available to the public, in a comprehensive information packet, such as the hillside Development Manual. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission direct staff to prepare a Hillside Development Manual to be considered by the Planning Commission. It Is anticipated that this information will be -available for review by the Zoning Ordinance Committee during the first week of April. The Planning Commission will review during May. Reip ctfull submitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:TJD:kds `�,'�.;. IM. 0 DATE: TOt FROM t SYt SUBJECT: 1711, CITY OF HANC110 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT MARCII 12, 1980 PLANNING COMMISSION 0 JACK LAM, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TIM DREDI.E, ASSOCIATE PLANNER TENTATIVE GENERAL PLAN HEARING SCHEDULE The completion of the Cenoral Plan by Sadway /Cooke is progressing wall. Currently the consultant in completing Task G of the General Plan Program - "Development of options and alternatives ". The consultant will present to the Citizens Advisory Committee (C.A.C.) their analysis of land use alter- natives at the March 11, 1900 meeting. 'The public review period will occur once the General Plan alternatives have been fully evaluated and the draft document has been reviewed by staff. It is anticipated that this review period will start during the later part of May. Draft copies of the General Plan document will be available to all Planning Commissioners and to the general public at that time. A tentative hearing schedule for the review and adoption of the General Plan has been prepared and is attached for your information. As you can see, the overall schedule is consistant with the goal to adopt the General Plan by August of this year. You will note that the schedule sets forth 5 Planning Commiusion meetings to review the General Plun in the month of June, occuring on each Monday. It is not anticipated that all meetings will be necessary, however, this schedule provides the flexibility for possible additional meetings. F ,)llowing the public hearings on the General. Plan public hearing will be held on the E.I.R. of the General Plan by the Planning Commission on July 7, 1980. Once this has been complete all comments will be prepared and forwarded to the City Council for their consideration at the meetings of July 16 and 30. It is at that time the Council may adopt the General Plan and certify the final Environmental Impact Report. After the adoption a final copy of the General Plan in summary will be published. Res ectful�l'ysubmitted, ® JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:TB:cd Enclosure: Tentative General Plan Hearing Schedule ITEM "M" 1 TENTATIVE GENERAL PLAN I{EAIUNO TASK Sedway /Cooke to prasant alternativen to C.A.C. Staff review of screen check draft General Plan and S.I.R. Draft General flan available to public and 45 day E.I.R. review period. Sedway /Cooke to present General Plan to C.A.C. Planning Commission hearing on draf%: General Plan (Minimma two hearings) Planning Commission hearing on E.I.R. City Council hearing on adoption of General Plan and certification of E.I.R. DATE March 11, 1980 7:00 p.m. May 29 1980 May 230 1980 Mny 27, 1980 7:00 p.m. June 219016,23,30 7:00 p.m. July 90 1980 July 16 and 30 `i