No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/02/02 - Agenda Packet it .t { •/ 1W 1 1 l 11 p1 ,� i • • �7 �J n v.. 4ti 1' 'III 1, l 1 1� 1 1 •1 1 . A l' {A 1 I, ♦ I 1 1 � 1 1 \nj C�CA,41 MY OF RAN M CUCAMO:VGA o PLANNING COTMMLSSION �c Z AGENDA 1977 Mpnday February 2, 1981 LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. -Pledge of Allegiance Ii. Roll Cal Commissioner Dahl Commissoner Sceranka Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Rempel III. Announcements 45 Min. IV. Review of Land Use Recommendations for Etiwanda Area and Surrounding Area At the January 26 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed Sand use alternatives to the Draft General Plan for Etiwanda and surrounding areas. Based upon that discussion and analysis, recommendations for land use modifications are being forwarded to the Planning Commission for their consideration- . e 90 Min. V. Review and Discussion of Park and Recreation Element Throughout the entire process of preparation of the Draft General Plan, public comment has emphasized the importance of parks and recreation opportunities. The Draft Park and Recreation Element, which is contained in the Land Use and Development Super Element, will be discussed by the Community ,Service Director, Mr. 9111 Holley. Recommendations for re- visions to the Park and Recreation Element will be considered at the February 5, 2982, General Plan meeting. 15 Min. Break sr r i Planning Commission Agenda -2- February 2, 1981 Gs 5 60 Min. Vi. Review and Discussion .of General Plan Policies for the 4' Planned Communities Area The land defined in the General Plan as Planned Communities a::ea takes up a large portion of the vacant land within the City. Currentlu, the City has one application pending for G- a Planned Community; another developer is considering an application for an additional Planned Community. The Plan- ping Commission encourages the use of a Planned Community concept for any large vacant area. The General Plan dis- ': cusses policies which deal with the Planned Communities and Specific Plans. Presentation of these policies will be made for the Commission to review and discuss. 60 Min. VII. Review of Draft Environmental Impact Report Earlier the Staff presented the Draft Environmental Impact a Report and Summary Matrix of mitigation measures proposed within the DEIR. The Staff will review the Environmental Assessments, topics A-I. The remaining topics under En- vironmental Assessments will be discussed at the February 9 General Plan meeting. VIII. Adjournment Thi sng~ il o Fe ary 9 'at: C 2ty Ro Eta v�ue, f '. a cont ' ?u c heari�;pn the Vic Zanned C unity. j: r. d y. r: '1 ,r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C,�ICAMpti, MEMORANDUM . ,� AWL o� January 29, 1980 E}- Q Z 1977 To: Planning Commission From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department rye Subject: PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT - RANCHO CUCAMONGA DRAFT GENERAL PLAN The residents of the Tri-Communities incorporated in 1977 with goals of improving the level of community planning services, improving the level of law enforcement services, and improving and increasing the amount of park and recreation opportunities available to our residents. It will be the subject of this report to discuss the last of the three items cited above, that of "parks and recreation opportunities", or more specifically, how .those opportunities translate into an Element of the General Plan_ • e • m • • • Before getting into those specifics, however, a few factors and thoughts that influence the nature of this type of element. The first factor considered is the standard of park development estab- lished by the City Council. Ordinance 105, adopted June 4, 1980, establishes that Rancho Cucamonga's standard will be five acres per one thousand popula- tion. This practice of fixing park acres in a ratio to population is a standard method employed throughout most our nation. Therefore, when a specific "build-out" population of 148,000 is established through zoning and density standards, it can be determined that 740 acres of parkland will b-- theoretically required to meet the established park standard_ t For a theoretical build-out population of 130,000, the requirement would be 650 acres; 850 acres for 170,000 population; and so forth. This element, then is very closely connected to density. i Another factor for consideration is striking proper balance between the financial requirements created by a park system weighed against our responsibility to fulfill our requirement of providing recreational opportunity to the people. To illustrate that point, from a strictly financial outlook, which would include acquisition, development and ongoing maintenance, the hest idea would be to meet the City's entire park need with one large 740 acre park in the center of the City. Front a park users perspective, every street would have a park at the end of every block. Obviously, neither idea is sound. The former does not meet the citizen's needs, and the latter drives the City into bankruptcy. A properly balanced design of this Element will satisfy the requirements of both viewpoints, that of the user and the financier. . . . sort of. (continued to page 2) Memo - pg. 2 1/29/81 to: Planning Commission from: B. Holley subj: Park and Recreation Element - Draft General Plan A third and last preliminary comment before moving into the specifices of the Draft Plan. Parks and recreation is not an exact science as is physics or engineering. Everybody has played soccer, coached a little league team, or been on a. picnic in a park. You will find that anyone that ;has done one of these things, or the other activities possible within a park will gladly give an informed, expert opinion as to what a park, system should be. And that opinion is proper. It is for this individual and his softball team or family picnic that the system is being designed and operated. However, playing soccer, coaching a little league team or having a picnic in a park does not necessarily give one a balanced view of the total City needs to be met by the park system. Therefore, special interest testimony or comment, should be taken and considered as that .. ... . testimony of a focused special interest. This does not mean that special interest testimony is not valued_ On the contrary, special interest groups have played an important role in specific park and recreation areas of interest and have provided specific expertise when needed or requested by Rancho Cucamonga. The Alta Loma Riding Club would be the prime example of a valued special interest resource. The point of the last preliminary comment is that ehe design of a park system, while not an exact science, is also not a popularity contest or a guessing game. It must be weighed and carefully considered to meet_ the park and recreation needs of a diverse clientele having a diverse range of interests and having the flex- ibility to viably neet those needs for a. long, long time. The Parks and Recreation Element is addressed under the Public Facilities Section, pages 90 through 101_ To minimize comment on the text of this Element, this report will address only points with which the Community Services Department disagrees of feel nee emphasized to the Commission, Council and general public as "very impo: . t i' A_ Third Paragraph, Page 91. Change 260 acres to 100 acres. B. First Paragraph, Page 92 - ---- - A projected population of 160,000 residents__ ___ This figure will need revision. 6 C. Same location as above, the concluding last three sentences. Very Important. r; D. The four objectives are good, to the point, and broad enough to encompass the gambit of operations_ Small exception, however, I would strike out the term "community scale" in objective three. it is not a commonly understood term and clouds, in my opinion, an otherwise clear statement of objectives. E. First Paragraph, Page 94. In speaking of the City Park, all WILLS and WOULDs to be changes to MAYS and SHOULDs. (This recommendation would be suggested throughout the remainder of t'le text and will not be reiterated) . (continued to page 3) kt: Memo - pg. 3 1/29/81 to: Planning Commission from: B. Holley subj: Park and Recreation Element - Draft General Plan F_ Page 97 through 101, Three-tier system. Strongly suggest changing all references of Multi-Neighborhood Parks to "Community Parks", and Mini-Neighborhood Parks to simply "Mini-Parks". It would be in our best interest to use standard Park terms and designations rather than create new ones when it serves no real positive purpose. Under Cocmmznity (M-14) Parks, first item, change - ". .... to serve a population of approximately 10-50,000 persons within a service radius of 1/2 to 3 miles" to - serve a population within a 3 mile radius." Under Neighborhood Park, first item, change - to serve a population of approximately 2 - 10,000 persons within a service radius of 1/4 to 1/2 mile" to - ".. .. to serve a population within a 1 mile radius." Under Mini (M-N) Parks. Disagree with Sedway/Ccoke's interpretations, suggestions and presentations of the Mini Park concept. Would suggest the following as an alternate presentat'-on: "Mini-Park" The Mini Park shall be employed by the City in instances where it is determined the best interest of the immediate surrounding development will be served- - Mini Park size shall be one lot to 1 acre- - Administration and maintenance of the Mini Park shall be as in the Community and Neighborhood Park. The third portion of this report deals with the park placement map. The sites are numerous and will be discussed at the presentation February 2, 1981. Two areas will, however, be discussed at this time. First, the Planned Communities. No parks are shown in the Terra Vista cr Victoria Plans. Park locations and sizes would be more appropriately designated AM during review of each of these plans. They will be required to comply with the same standard as the rest of the City, 5 acres per 1000 residents. (continued to page 4) 6 Memo - pg. 4 1/29/81 to: Planning Commission from: B_ Holley subj: Park and Recreation E:.ednent - Draft General Plan Second, Base Line Park, or the 99 acre City Park. I mention this as it will be the most controversial on the map. `hus far this project is rather unpopular with everyone I speak to . . . except the average citizen. -It would be easy to avoid the controversy surrounding this designation by abaau:oning it and scattering the acreage elsewhere. I firmly believe that this single site is the best potential park in Rancho Cucamonga. The preciieding statement is based on its centrality, size, residential buffers, trail access, and topography. The conditions it presents cannot be equally matched elsewhere in Rancho Cucamonga. This park would be the anchor or the hub of park and recreation activity within Rancho Cucamonga. A fifty-fifty development between sophisticated facility development (lighted sports fields, swimming pool, tennis couxts, etc.) and picnic/open-field area would be created. , More over the possibility of partial outside funding for a project of this scope is very good_ I'm sure that much discussion will occur on this site and I welcome the opportunity. If you have any questions prior to the February 2 meeting, I will be happy to meet with you at your convenience. 4 Art CITY 1' OF RANUC 10 (_XCAMONGA �o GQCA!y�NC' Slkff REPORT r AMIN O - O DATE: February 2, 1981 z_ U > TO: Members of the Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner SUBJECT: PLAWMED C011MUNITIES PLANNING AREA ABSTRACT: This memorandum will discuss the Planned Communities Area and recommended changes for consideration by the Planning Commission. DISCUSSION: The Planned Communities Area lies within the central por- tion of the City. Most of the land within the Planned Communities Area is currently vacant. At the last General Plan meeting , there were seven areas considered for change within the Planned Communities planning area. These changes, if approved by the Commission on Feb- ruary 2, 1981 , will result in a net reduction of approximately 1200 dwelling units. Additionally, the changes will reflect the City's desire to protect, transition and buffer existing communities and existing development from future developments proposed or currently under consideration. Through the plans and policies,the Draft General Plan identifies certain recommendations for the Planned Communities Area. These will be discussed at the Commission's meeting of February 2. Attached to this report is a summary of the General Plan policies for the Plan- ned Communities Area. As the Planning Commission is aware, P.C. 80-01 - Victoria , has been submitted for review and consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council . The victoria Plan is currently under review by the Planning Commission. This plan is proposed by the W. Lyon Co. and encompasses approximately 2000 acres -- land that is owned or under the control of the Wn. Lyon Co. Any changes approved in the General Plan must be appropriately reflected on ;.:-y submitted planned com- munities. Lewis Homes owns 1300 acres of land within the Planned Communities planning area. Currently they are in the process of preparing a submittal for a planned community encompasing all of the 1300 acres called Terra Vista . At this point in time, no Flans or texts have been submitted for City review or consideration although previous plans or texts have been discussed with Lewis Homes. No changes in land use considerations are recommended for the Planned Community Area other than those which have been proposed at the 'last General Plan meeting. Res ectFu y bnitted, ry Ho a C ty PI nner BKH:Jk f Encl . SUMMARY OF GENERAL PLAN POLICIES - PLANNED COMMUNITIES AREA - Provides for coRmunity foci with the regional center and camnunity center - Provides a balanced variety of land use - Provides a land use pattern which encourages linkage of transit usage to commercial , residential , and industrial area - Encourages opportunity for range of housing units through varied housing density - Hiking and biking trails line residential areas with activity centers - Development will be able to incorporate all city design concepts s c � I 11 d l ••i I�. � d l I �•l � `. ° r 1 � tla .1 l 1 I Ir r 1. 1.1 li ' r a r� 1 „I i\. 1 1, 1 1\MMN i1 1Y J a 1 QP r. r II a W Q4 Ili 11 ti� w IP 11 OJ ,c o Y Y 11 o a 1 '3nY Aaa31H3 o CD m 9�O I t Z ; FO o LL 11pp II F J V N I cc C �... w x Qli O vl NII y sr Y '?AV VONVM 113 N Z W 3133a3 AVO i e 3AV p� _ /• r 8131S3N30a x o / v t"Mom Its aIm 'w W f0 Ix.. O •> N it03 W c 4 / 3 ua b�9p m=' ova q�• x e '3AV N3AVF4 m O 4 11 r u Z tl <_1 _ VSOWa3N tV' fa tit ` 'F N ;bjfJ:Jf.i 0 Y •3nv aTve/N3av U � �I •3AV_ NVW T73N So 2 k .z L) '15 NVIl3NN V3 VONO (3AV OaA3NIA V P 1� Ew O S 3 1 WV3l13 yy� � r.4 `^ xVI ct r! < f1:. .� if W co G c 0�• U •1 0 Mrr1 i f U 3ON3AV OIT3N3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGP. OC�Cntyp�uC STAFF PLEPORT O F U 1977 DATE: February 2, 19E1 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TO THE GENERAL PLAN ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission will consider and review portions of the Draft Environmental Impact report to the General Plan. Public and Commission comments will be incorporated into the draft document prior to final acceptance. BACKGROUND: The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) of the General Plan was distributed to the Planning Commission at the January 22 meeting. In addition, Planning Commission has been provided a Summary Matrix to the DEIR. This matrix identifies potential impacts and mitigation meas- ures that are proposed in the General Plan. The DEIR does the following things: 1 . Identifies the impact of potential development of the General plan and how, the policies of the General Plan would act to mitigate any significant impacts. 2. Outlines the environmental concerns which will need to be evaluated during the review of more detailed plans. In order for the Planning Commission and public to have the opportunity to comment in full on the DEIR, the Planning Commission will begin considering the first portion of the Environmental Assessment at their meeting of February 2. Topics to be discussed at this meeting will enclude topography, geology, seismicity, land resources, hydrology, biology, meterological and air quality, scenic resources, and historic resources. The remaining topics listed under Environmental Assessment will be discussed at future meetings. A summary of the impacts and mitigation measures under the topics to be discussed at this meeting is provided as an attachment. The page number noted following each mitigaiton measure indicates the location this mitigation measure can be found in the DEIR. rv: Draft Environmental Impact Report February 2, 1981 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Plan, ,, , "ommission review and discuss the DE1R and potential impacts and miti . ,L . . ' easures as discussed and contained within the following topics: tope•, : .. . . , geology, seismicity, land resources, hydrology, biology, meterologic a. :: quality, scenic resources, and historic resources. 2es >ctfully subm' ted, BA , HOG C' Planner BKH:TJB:jr Attachments: DEIR Summary Matrix d U J QI q A L W n w p; N C G C a V A 7 J a ^ rn V L y u C o a o c J q N a E p• � q q a V L + N W O N N V L C y1 a V. ♦r, O '0 . T T Nr V U N 2 N a Y Y 9 C�1 1U N C Y A v C L L a �Ly L O w y tD4P : P.. c W N�� N A� C O 1 0� 0 6� C90Cw V.Or • d T I V O O+ •.q 4 A+ a t C U C'O w L a P Y O O Y WCId VIO Y OICYM Nq �� OV Y I Y pG U W J++ Gu C.O- � Wn M� CY W�� LYO i1r C0 n' C wL V+Y Ir CI E L .••N . E ✓ I C N N O. A Y b g C n Y � c 0 0 V- N Y Y O q q t'O Y O N C W O G N N W N C+ C.q` DY W 6 O Ya J^ O N y S •• E i i 8Y CI L CI L N CC O y i. W N L OI N UO O.U O q C N C O+.•� G O O O C Y C q + a c l'Y N N 9 J�N L E T L 6 g L Yam- W r•.=••Jz+ T= C L C N W ♦r N•r + Eb Y+ CNwY— LCgf+ W + LO 6agAY qr IYO C1a A+ V 6afW LGCa CpN4N •OO w. O+F U9Q C9 � 0� V�Q>Ql1^ LLd LY C^ SLT+•.N-V- N VVUO q ][� Lu WO^ 600� rtYi pq dG 6N0N NYNBO+ C O GN Co . VYOOMI 2 pI iy+ o.•.- L•.- W c+ W N f� YY CC Lr4 W .Q N>MIC an C. N > qc-- NO q nr+ L OI�.A- W �L_w P 0V —y wxn F• 1 Aqq V Y.J� C�C11 0 � su 0 LW.0 U 0,; M IJ CI E 0 N � N M N A c M� NE.- Ed^ Lam- N+Y _fY tJpp ay,� A Oqq ULNNa �i N 6UL04 dOM UNL jWa q+ Gam } �A CY CON.d + q+ i� q6 wCOTV GIO A� CCII d ~ U— M, NWw GCIL CNfY.. O L.0 4wJMNAd Lw1y} vdA11t,[ V wdq V }+ N+ T Y V Y Y w N A N L' N L�/ w w w N a M q .-• L N A Y t OI q a L Y Yl w N N l•C .1 N N a a D[ q L•r q W'� N '� N Y �C w.^ J rJ O• Y^ C WmW �ww Y CCII N•.. A Ll �J s 9gCNYG. qvN Lw0 w+ LY XRy wCUt'I Y U A Y'iiUW w0001 TLG•.V^'ON W dir qLw N �cC�tV L" � q'.• V CO.NQ LOi�ye�,YCw • C w y. q O. A > N�YW40 9J� G.pp.N + a01d W C,'NO�T YpLp U.- +� wLH Jw•^• aYCNCV � N^ r�G- " YO C.pOi OT.wpLNI NOA - VN� G a ,�^YAYw•lEnL'OwT' �1y A� wwOli A �pww QlOALpaLC JLCC rpRUO �N�pIpnILN�U yKCVO NAO G.wG qCC qGL G LC OQpI' OC � C CV1 ^U O. L LTCN .Cw+Y L� {y Y L•. m J�IL O 9 Y J O T, 4.Y C'1. 1"• la �A U. L 1'W A N•.� L C H O.N C16 N N L O H r. li A .0 i V^ td q N•r Oln q L .. C VLt NY 1 CA L ^J N 1L 4 O V V Y +W C ll 01•r w J V W N N O N L N V U N Lyy••C^ pAWI U� N C.- + q V V 11C q E Co p�1 W N.A- CNML YOI O� > XY•r COI OY= wO M,C y + w a U OI 7 + q a CI L V Y G V N J V C CCII w 'O J q ^N G N o Nl NOIq L+ N V LGIl+ N � q� vL NM L_ (.'. •r y N C O N +•l N A y N 9 N w 4 CI 1 w GZ ANL ^� W L 41 OI L' IiYV- wJCL ppY Sw' 010 C U . NO g oq Y uai••pC- NC-ow 2 'JO Y"w'. T C YCY pQ O W L Y• N O G % L p A a Y L V C N C � 'W.0.; qU¢LO w YY-L =VN- C V 5rd LA t L� L W V a W plr. T .pY O V L p A w pQ1.O . r•�_X V0 CO w x6 gN1! AUO•Ut 9 �Npp V b Y LNO 4C Cw N E qq 0 OLG UNA yO ~CCNII M q C Y A Y Y •n Nr• LJ CTY Y � Y N L C T p+ C+ Cry QEC� TC C N.^ N w N•.� C•.- (1C� OI"••Y C1 C pN1.CO 4ANO NYW b.A CL ENE wW gvJLY GN pY CqCII L O L'O OaQ>QI1 M Vw YNN YA•YOC..-.GU NYl' b N �Ow GO+N• GlW Dd . ai wS Ca d 7M Op L o.ww aM CY CLtMO OaLYO N � U U L w 1.� � T T O IOi1 O O 1Ny N � V q• Y, pO W C T O� OC V ce O yo Npp c u o A!v w rv1 �"�� W FO• w N J Z m C V _ l q N IV N T U L w 1- 01 L 4' _U q V N L d �J q V W N V O U A J C W w w O Y 4 N L y Y Z J C C V U yYy/ d N 2 C A .NCO C L W NLwrcLl wow V wOCYLR dC N yNy .^y p V N T V L 1 y R O. M d O•.• W`r A••• d N G N dtV Nu N O u� w uLL.- 6O.•r•' EOLMw VC+fO•rGpJ.^A V+VW' CNLd N1VI4p r•A.'•.yV... D �•pOCLV� VCAOLLWU>LwS X Lq tO C+ N� MELA OO•�Y wc— O. AC OIEO LL Lyw rFO�Ju.C•lydL �O1 NV �'y V C0w.TUj V POV- w-W.wNY yECy:.N. LC 9W T NL0.OCp N O wW YVd LL C C AL COII 9V'O^w�OC MLdL NVC,TN dquN T - y vw w�w W . W ^ 0, r' 04' 0C4 N01Ld ppYq X ! OW1 wN - R } Lww DL oNw BO L d6hd OLdC •qr d O yC� Ry U�VLO F V4•y V V V O V ); NAM— J A } — dN N V R W N L t .,7 V V M N•r• d G y G .•`U q,MOw O 9 CE C O {f 'pG CCV [Oy[1Ir . O '{Ay. wpwu Qpc�p11 V WYO. O � XW wT� LLwL NNMW LG qV Y� O �rLY w +I IVM�y41L N_YC ZI i LI2 � �• NtlrL.Y Ay yN•L VyLr+ Nr_ �.L AG Ly•^ Cry = _ '• •„r L L T q L V X A� 'J w L YM (V(JJI., C` r�jj ¢•�ppR� WoVr� I. yA 3 0. C p W4• q t 46•r- A tN 0T! Cc OEN yyy CL YL Y. OLr--^•UWW = C � O x u V•` C L y O w o C O L U L N w N L O L L U T L O SY L� V N � N Q N Y N m �Co. d2 ppO ANdrgL•. .-- 0.wCLd0 aw � RX Ady+- wC p� Wp. S 3LAC Vp WqA > 0 LON WL0C4 N UN ppQN C Ow NNL Np9 gTgN C0 pp y p L•�Cr^- UM L WppYy1I1 7L LyLd N=� N� WCO.2 W >Vr Op O.CO YA dCLO 0.d ¢Ii =Y 4G CM94. Vr NY 60 O.•^Opf O X+- V C y d.L V'•� (Ly y L d•.• N G X O.N V yQI qq pp �I NLLLy NM ur } NVVw Ey y pcoV o{, NOV 2= 0 Oy NCY RAyA•OO C }! R O �' T � 0. �t ..p y.rL+ COY\•CrY� � OOCOypI Cp O. YL Tom. LC6 VrT •d- 0 � 6NO CAC dTyX yulW C•rC CVAY uL RudWG�j' �•Qprfd1�Ad>LG1O�uNV VT spp6dyVyw udVN MOL' LNY LX T LV R W V N �WC''y>LpOV\FUIN�N NUL WK LN�NL OV! C yC bYM IJO W Nd= A OWUO�NXw d•9r.ruC"Ny'+uOJwNdpwCNty tT d C 0.LAy AApLI 9NNpC 0C1�^U S. dA4 Y� Hi0^r NTA 1•- OYkA' L•.•Z w O LL L C h r•^ q NV 1- O.C. hM Gy UqQ J•E dMA hu d�L1J Yu dN C Q• L p M C yryy R L 4- O w 0 •.- L C r u•O w u r- W' d O Lu rypY yO� Ny (Y YO- �L O OV qMq} NT CV V w L S L r>ti- N Ol O u t X W rr-M C C N O Y'O A L� �•. GI A .0 ow d C C dL pp L Tay A Iwir 4 �uL O'••)O i d_ Eo M u S N y1 _ T we o oL �Lt ^'Td AyA FQ.Y•yyU r C U T YwN� 00 � .�� LWL y C 61dR 60 Ny O1L p L L C N C V r� C N w T .M Ly 41 L Ord C N d w N V U V L L w w d •'J N _� VI V w 1• y L > > N f NL Lr' J TV N L Nr� w JL ' N d C X A $ pNpIIO wpbpN V• y� N pgolIN NYO X Or A NC•.- 06. ggNqT L� C LL GCNO Lp LN W TML ljV L gAOC 1yONA 01C �1 Y .r q UL� N DU�II•^ � O C'O C•^ V N W EL •.C� C�_ A � LYuuAL Y C N i ryry M +^ Or T•� L � T r^- A •N Ln C TE^ C 1pC. C w ur PL MLX Q N yO•'N T••rV NR i ? •C 3r `x.YL Yi: iX 6GI.G N 010 p A O1 yLr � y L FO V y V �p MyprL�.II.' VEI •J• y[Yy[�I AY L y V [My w M fJ. Y V�I•.yy y bbyp 1: 6 4wC 6.A�, A '1V RVL � �MN 6L � J GLaLO>Ar1� p1 O y O u O ww G q9 M L 6 01 p3� O } w �I Qy>1wNC > L YTLy L6� yyY^ WY� > > L Ya � LLIN w_ Nµ Q. !Y.yR O^+L> U U 8 MS Q w N 00 O0. 9 N8W OV+'•'� �i� o uv o I, N w p— M ON C V Y. L O L W w Yi 4i�'. — CITY OF RANCI10 CUCAMON:A 'Cn+u STAFF REPORT r O O DATE: February 2, 1961 TO: Members of the Planning Commission �u�� �1977 �u FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planne BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LAND USE IN THE ETIWANDA PLANNING AREA ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission will consider recommendations on revisions to the land use surrounding the Etiwanda area. Should the Planning Commission agree with the recommendations, Staff would re- quest that they take action to approve said changes. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission, at their January 2E meeting, discussed recommendations for land use changes in and around the Etiwanda Planning Area. This meeting was held at the 'Etiwanda In- termediate School , where public input was received regarding charges in land use and on suggested land use changes initiated by the Staff for areas west of the Etiwanda Planning Area. The Planning Commission directed Staff to consider this input and bring back to the Commission ® recommendations on land use changes. The Staff has initiated requests for the land use changes west of Etiwanda Avenue which provide for a greater transition in residential density and is more in keeping with the low and very low density cha- racter of the Etiwanda Planning Area. Staff requests reduced densities surrounding this area by approximately 1200 units. In addition, Staff requested that the P'ianning Commission consider recommending the de- velopment of a specific plan for the Etiwanda community. The purpose of this specific plan would be to provide mare detailed analysis and a planning program for future development in the area . The Specific Plan would include the foli owing : Establish design standards Identify a c annunity center Develop precise street p?:ns Develop precise park plans Establish a location for canmercial uses A0just ljr4use atterns 4�� n The majority of the land use equest for onsiderati n was to provide for more canmercial land use designation along Etiwanda Avenue and CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �oGVCAA4() STA'I' REPORT O O z F $ Z U Y DATE: January 26, 1981 197/ { TO: Planning Commission II FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner i BY: Steve McCutchan, Associate Planner IIII SUPJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REQUESTS FOR CHANCES TO THE LAND USE PLAN IN THE ETIWANDA AND PLANNED COMMUNITIES PLANNING AREAS ABSTRACT: Numerous requests for changes to the Land Use Plan have been received. Staff has grouped those in the Etiwanda and Planned Communities Planning Areas for Planning Commission review and comment. Their input will be necessary for preparation of recortmendations which will be brought to the Planning Commission at the February 2, 1981 meeting. Those requests for changes in the Etiwanda and Planned Communities Planning Area have been compiled for .your review at tonight's meeting. Staff has included an overall vacinity :nap, a cover sheet for each individual request, and a copy of the letter submitted by the ap- plicant. The four requests that are Staff Initiated are included under a single cover sheet. ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION: Following is a summary of the requests for Planning Commission review. Staff requests direction from the Planning Commission to make recom- mendations to be considered at the February 2, 1981 meeting. 1. Frank 0. Strader - Approximately 4 acres north of Etiw ost� Office on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue. /J Interim Plan: High Density Alternative Area Draft Plan: Office / Request: Commerciai To encourage commercial at this location woui rease traffic on Etiwanda Avenue and tend to change the entire character of that area. Related commercial uses are allowed within the de=ignated Office category. a; u,, Y Planning Commission Ash January 26, 1981 Page 2 2. Andrew Barmakian - Approximately 10 e Northwest corner o Etiwanda and Base Line. Interim Plan: Windrows Draft Plan: Low Residential Request: Commercial Refer to analysis for Item No. 1 3. Elden Bainbridge.— Approximately 10 acres on the southwest corner of Etiwanda and Base Line. Interim Plan: Alternative Area Draft Flan: Low Residential Request: Commercial Refer to analysis for Item No. 1 4. Wallace Siegel - Approximately 6.5 acres directly or h of the Buddhist Temple west of Etiwanda Avenue. Interim Plan: Alternative Area Draft Plan: Low Residential Request: Commercial Refer to analysis for Item Not 1 5. Reginald Bell and Roberti C. Flocker - Approximately 7 acres on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue between Base Line Avenue and the rail- road tracks. r interim Plan: Windrows Draft Plan: Low Residential w Request: Commercial I Etiwanda Avenue's special boulevard character should be preserved and if commercial were allowed, it would increase traffic and change the character of that area. Commercial opportunities in Etiwanda should be more centrally located and should be evaluated through the proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan. 6. James Thompson - Property located south of Highland Avenue adjace 1l0" to the Flood Control Channel ana east of East Avenue, V Interim Plan: Low Residential Draft Plan: Low Residential Request: Commercial frontage and remainder Medium Densit (5-14 du/ac) Commercial on Highland would not be appropriate and would require special design treatment such as frontage road. The medium density may b2 appropriate, however the problems associated with buffering and transition should raise some concern. rv�; Recommendations for Land Use in the Etiwanda Planning Area February 2, 1981 Page Two other major streets within the Etiwanda area. A significant portion of public comment regarding these requests indicated their desire not to have additional cconerciai areas within the Etiwanda area. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission con- sider the foTTowing revisions or additions to the Draft General Plan. 1 . That a Specific Plan for the Etiwanda community be developed. 2. That revisions to the land use plan be made according to i those shown on Exhibit "A" . 3. That action on items 1 through 15 be taken as recanmiended. Re pectfu "ly ubmitted, arr � Hoga i;t/'Planne 11 BKH :TJB :jk Attachments : Exhibit "A" - Land Use Changes Surrounding Etiwanda Summary of Land Use Requests - Items 1 through 15 Staff Recomnendation on Land Use Plan Revisions of Etiwanda Area ',ir Planning Commission January 26, 1981 Page 3 7. Ralph Kleinman - Approximately 20 acres south of Vic aria wes of the Devore Freeway. Interim Plan: Windrows ' Draft Plan: Low Residential Request sigh Density esidential Commercial would not be appropriate adjacent to residential areas. Higher density residential could be a consdieration adjacent to Freeway and rail service, but may tend to change character of area. 8. Carl Schiro - Approximately 15 acres north of Foothill between the Devore Freewzj and Etiwanda. Interim Plan: Service Commercial and Low Residential Draft Plan: Medium Density Residential (5-14 du/ac) Request: Commercial ® Presently, only the frontage along Foothill is zoned commercial . Commercial here and on adjacent requests could create strip com- mercial . A neighborhood commercial designation is located on the southeast corner of Foothill and Et-aWanda. 9. Michael Scarlata - Less than 1 acre north of Foothill between the Devore Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue. Interim Plan: Service Commercial Draft Plan: Medium Residential Request: Commercial Refer to analysis on Item No. 8 10. Victor Di Carlo - Less than 1 acre north of Foothill between Devore Freeway and Etiwanda Avenue. Interim Plan: Service Commercial Draft Plan: Medium Density Residential Request: Commercial Refer to analysis on Item No. 8 11 . Sebastian Masi - Approximately 25 acres on the southwest corner of Foothill and Rochester. Interim Plan: Industry Minimum Impact Draft Plan: Industrial Park Request: Commercial Related commercial is allowed in Industrial Park. Both the Sedway/Cooke and Blayney Plans are consistent. Introduction of commercial center or retail uses would disrupt integrity of industrial park area. / Y r January 26, 1981 Page 4 71 Andrew Barmakian - Approximately 13 acres south of Foothill between Turner and leaven. �. Interim Plan: Mixed Use and Medium Density Residential Draft Plan: Office and Low Density Residential (2-4 du/ac) Request: Medium Density (5-14 du/ac) on rear portion of property. A copy of the Assessor's map for the area in question is attached. Reference is map to stub streets. The low density is a logical extension of area development and the higher density would be iso- lated and inappropriate. 130 Raveen Knokvechaycint_ Approximately 22 acres located at the northeatr corner of—Base Line and Rochester® Interiii, Plan: Low Density Residential Draft Plan: Medium Density Residential r. Request: Commercial Site is too large for commercial development and is not the best location to serve the surrounding area. The inclusion of com- mercial here would constitute a spot designation. t 14. Don De Verka - Approximately 8 acres on the northeast corner of i. Rochester and Foothill . Interim Plan: Alternative Area i Draft Plan: OfficeN)�� Request: High Density Residential (25-30 du/ac) < Either the existing or requested designation would be appropriate. {' The office designation would tend to be ore compatible with existing / single family housing to the north. 15. Bob Lawrence - Approximately 8 res n th of the Pacific Railroad 1 tracts and west of East Avenu . ° Interim Plan: Windrows Reside ial { Draft Plan: Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) `•' Request: Medium Density Residential (5-14 du/a) Site is surrounded by Ww Density Residential and would not be compatible with the hi r density requested. , Resp ctfuil sub fitted, ar Z. Hag Ci t Pl anner o-. BKH:SM:jr t aa;. . SUMMARY OF STAFF INITIATED GENERAL PLAN MODIFICATIONS Modify Victoria St. from Day Creek Blvd. to Etiwanda Avenue so that it does not continue east of Etiwanda Avenue but instead in- tersects southerly with Base Line Road. iaB. Modify that medium density area between Day Creek Blvd. and Etiwanda Avenue south of Highland Avenue and west of the Railway from medium density (5-14 du/ac) to low-medium density (5-8 du/ac) . C. Modify that high density area north of Base Line between Day Creek Blvd. , and Etiwanda .Avenue so that the western portion is reduced from high density (25-30 du/ac) to medium-high (15-24 du/ac) and the eastern portion from high density to medium density (5-14 du/ac) . D. Modify that high density area south of Base Line Avenue between Day Creek. Blvd. and Etiwanda Avenue so that the eastern half of that high density area is reduced from high density (25-30 du/ac) to medium density (5-14 du/ac). E. Modify that medium density area south of Base Line , north of Church and between the Edison easements from medium density (5-14 du/ac) to high density (25-30 du/ac). F. Modify the easterly one-half of that medium density area west of the Rochester tract and south of Church Street from medium density ® (5-14 du/ac) to low medium (5-8 du/ac) except for that portion fronting Foothill Blvd. G. Move the nark designation west of the Rochester tract from Church Street to Rochester. H. Urge the County to move forward on the Foothills Specific Plan in order to properly plan the area north of Etiwanda. Urge close cooperation with the City. I. Encourage a specific plan be done after the adoption of the General Plan for Etiwanda area east of the Victoria Planned Community to the northerly and easterly city limits down to Foothill Boulevard. This specific plan to have direct interface with the Foothill 's Spe- cific Plan and participation by the Etiwanda community. Plan to iden- tify appropriate locations of additional street, traffic diversion from northern sphere, design elements, service requirements, environ- mental constraints , and more specific land use assignments. �J Modify that medium density between Rochester Avenue and Day reek Boulevard, on the west and east, and Victoria Avenue and Base Line Avenue on the north and south to Low Medium adjacent to Rochester and Medium High adjacent to Day Creek. r 1n *sip 1 �- 11 e' W II za LL 11 a N k Y II <ce Y 1 Y ,per 11 o n Aatl3H7 0 j1 F J e w a mil O F U W I I LL lull LL i 4 U 2 W I N WIf w ® NI •' s' Y a 1 `9' AC 2�1 '3AY YONVMII3 LL11 w 1 QI v N3 AVO__ _ '3AV &31S3H70a i{ -3 I s •a.W 1 .. r0 ► O •> N Z / J =� If e• am J tiOW 2 <zV a IL <M I u 4 •3AV N3AVH w II J Cd .�- SOWa3H 1 '^ II< aF w I a3Nalll- A h 1 d V = n 1< Zo � '3AV OlVa1H7aV m Vu 11 '3Ay NVW-111 o = W �W.. Is NVI"I3Nmv:) V9NOWY7N3 j AaA3 NIA 3AV V Spy a -2 i E ...�� O Usw so crt '�. 0­0 11 a m j ¢ Q <a 311N3AY 017p03 .. r ro ` , 'i . . w. �\� tea•• �!�'. : •:ems• ri, I! E\ IIIIII 1�1 O •� -:•: .. a ?". ... �' , III' I''' .. � I ,•.r, r • -• � •r•• C' �/. 11,1 I 1 1 I I, 1'1 LI, I'1'Il \ •i••••• �: ••H ; '•T m _ •F •' I ' II :. IIII .,l 1,1 • {�'�®�® •� i::•:::::::: :� •• 1 I , I 1 , 1 1•,�111!1 1 I I 1 I'I :'I ;:Q .!•.••-••'• -'-• '•'�,'i'I'I 111 11111 l 11 1 I I I I I ! I ICI • b•,•:!-••:••'• '1 ! 1 1 I III I I III I I :,1 1,11111 1 I,I,;111111111,• .•,•.•:•.•.•• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I ' I I,. I I . 1 I II II111 , 1 : I II III IIII , II: 111 I 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I I f'r I I I 1 1 I I I I II I it •• III I II I I I I II II 1 ': III 11 11 II '1 I 11 I E I II 1 1T I= t I I I I I I 111 l I I I I I II�:•:�-�:'� CC C5 IIIIIII1111111 III LII ,1? 11 ! 11 I I :'0ti��!':i[i ti •T�Cti�' I 111 I I II l 11 I 'fJ '—r.•.'. 1 1 I I I RGI' 1 1 1 ! III I III : 1 II I ol, IIIII I I I II I I : III LL.. I 1 I I W' � ` a I f. 1 I ' i l l l l 11 I 111 I I gill I I 111 I I�-`�� I�f11.:'-: ::: ,IIIIIII',I!Ill i'iI1111i11'I III�Ti'p��� � � ! i i I 1` .+` ...` •t m � I�� IIII �11��I�I Ill il�li tl l�l!7�11�j ll�i' �I ltil IIIIIII�'I _ �• I,I I I'• 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I iTl L' I I I ,,, 1 . •, .• I , IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiII ( IIIlill i,, • •.•.-•,;-;. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.,•, a ••�.,:; •:': 'I'I III I I I I I 1 1 1 11 1 I i l l l l t l l l l l l l . IIIIIIIIIiI, 'I : lil ' llilllllllllllli1111111 IIill ®® L i :;:I�T^': �.� IIIIIII IIII111i111111 •• I I I I'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 111 I I I 1� I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I ICI�I�1�11II III II II III IIIIIIII III II IIIIIIII ll II III III II IIII II(IIII IIIIIIII I,' r'1�1'1 711'111111t1 I I®II•• •I '•t., I•i,l'' III IIII II II IIIIII ll l� ��••.••I I I I I I I I I 1 1 IIII 11 1 tll I I I I I I I,1 I l l l i l l l l III,' IIIIIIIIIIIIII . IIII IIIIIII I111�111111 I I III I I I I I t l l l l,l I l l i l 1,1,1 I It. 737'Y. :: :•i: - •_ - _-_ _GCS_ __r�: 401 m rim .i • 1 . J 1 rt•TrTTTT• 1 1 1 ��� _ ; •U • I \ ••• • _ •ei 1 E■ i • a u .1 0• • 1 • • �eJ I . I i • I I C: 1 I 1 •II �� I • • •• ' m r: I 1• gyp-- Ii • • T .I 1 1 _ •• � � � I I �: I II III II IIIIII I,I. O ......: IIIIII': I'I' I : III III L: I I 111., I :. I I1111 'I lliillrlllll • :::: ::: y, IIIIII• II 1111 ' III1111'I'L • -�.�.'. �I::::: III 1 1 1,. 1I111111fill :I III II IIIIII II III,IIL LII�I I':. III 1 I ;� II II II II IIII ''l ll III IIIIIII I':I�I II II:�'1.' , I III I IIII III .}}• I� 11111itll (IIIIIIII II II II III1111111111�,�. 1111 I I' Z t II III L- .. ...:.. 111111,II.It1 III II IIII .�II. .. ............. n•1 I III 1�1 I I t I 1 1 1 I 1 I Y. 1 1 1 1 ........._. �� III11I11IIIIIIII IIIIIII i ( ill ..... I IIIIIIIIIIIII I.1, f— II�l Ili ll l l:�11 I .• L�j.l llitI IIII a � •• � '1 I•I 1•�IIIIII III II II II IIII II'II11 1�:' •�,tl r A y •. I C •.-1 .1 . III'1'll ll l'I:1,1 I'i" I'I'I . ' 7/, 'I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 }N,II II IIII II II I,I'II II Mill',' to �' •' III IIII IIIIII IIII II(IIII e ( I I I I I I I I 11,: I ' '• ' l 1 1 i l l l 1 1 1 1 1 ■■ICI II II II,I II IIII''IIII I'11II I I' 7+'1 ,1,lil Il ll il1111111{II:' of I I I I I I I'I 11 1 1 1 1 I IIIIIII . II I,I IIllllli { I,I I tr 111111111111111I,. tll,l 3 Z IIIIIII 11 r i I 1 11I1't .........,.. .w••mr w.w � p A 1'1 6 1 « r ( � CD L N I�111'11 I'I'll I'Il ii 1 I'Il1'11,�:�1�1 4•• I II11111111 IIIIII'. 11 ' 1111111111 ! I1111 , 1' b I ( IIIIIII I 11II III '. 0 �� O I III IIIII I 111�I i ! I I'I III 1 1 I,11 6p■■ IL I•L.II II'LI1 1•III •N 1 C .Il�illl!II II�I IIII II,I I,II r Y S - ` �� • ' r .y m E � � Q N W__::::.: I,I I,I ',I I� 11 I I I I I I IIIIII __'• _ I'I I I "I'l ll I I I I I I I I,I I I I,I• I I11 IIIIIIIIIIIIII I J.1 p N uI i I I I I,I I,I II IIII •,�I �•I'I�I�III I11 'Il �I�I�I�I II II�I�PII�I�1�1�1 III I 1 �I�I�IIIII�I Y Ql In I IIIII111111 �II1111 CF 1IIIIIIIIIIIII1111 _ I III1111111 IIIIII � '� 11111111111 � p17 'I IIII IIIIII I I III I III III111 Iy :�y1} - .- 1 1 1 1 1 -- • 1111 1 111 1 1 1 I I I I I I T T •:'- t U C I I1 ' II1111 X p ti III III IIII IIII IIII(IIII ''IIIIIIIIIII . IIIIIIIIIII IIIIII :•:: _ W �J �I:I III II I,LI I I 1 I Ir 1 IIIII • .•. I ::::::::::.:. ... � -•�� "•'• � w•swims��� ��•• �w • ��'11�11 I� 1•� y r:rr• 11�1 1 I •I'.I' •. \ `p . . . iQ LU w� • . \ 12 .I•1 1•I I'I=1'I 1-I'1'I'I,I,I•I I I 1 I'I':-i I ICI•I,1 •I,I I'I 1'1 '� a'�•'• ••' :•: •'•• I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII '� I I,I I,I I!I�I ( IIIIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII I 111.1 .1'It LI 11•I��•I��•I I 1 l'I l'I �I�\I'I\'I��' I , I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 III 1 �]ly : IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ! IIIIIII I IIIII IIII IIIIIIIIIIIII11111 ' IIIIIilllll - ;• • IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII111111 •-• .IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111111 e - - ' ( 1 I I I I I IIII I I I I I I I I I I I •:' � l0�.�� •• •••• ,I I ills I I VIIl IIIiIllIIII't'lllw,I�I�,'Il,l,'III'I'II'I'I'1�'II'I'Ill '• �tl i 7 W t � ••: 1 1{µyw �I I,I IIIII I'I'I'III'I'I 7'I'I'I \ \ ! 1�' li••1 1�11 1 � I 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I . II � III11 I 1 II III . I I I 1 I I 11 I IIII.� I I11 i I I111 ' II I I IIIIII II I 1 1 I1 I III I I'I IIIIII III _ I \K II I II 1 •: I IITYII II II \1 II I II I 1 I III II ( IIIIIII' Il I111 IIIIII III 11 I I I I I I 1 I I I it 11 11 III i I I II IIIII II I II I III 1 I 1 I IIIIIIII I IIIII I 11 11 11 II 1 I 1 : I I II IIIIIII III 11 I I I mono Qi ' III IRTL:."1� 1 �I IIWMIq!�III�'.�Y.•rl•.�.•. ••O• •7?M1:T . ...�A s�i :_:i ��Q�®I�� I I I I I I I I I I I I i l' _:_ •, a••,•j . . IIIIII ; � I' I IIII it III I'II I' Z �Xy'r W - : .I I I s � I I I I I i•�r . : rl ........::: -1 iaJ•' :: � y.. . ® • � I 1 I J'- I I • .........: ...........:: 1 1 e • r d - d 1' r 1 1111111• I1� I 1- VERY !014 KEGIQNAL _ !_ 1 2 DU/P,C COMMERCIAL .:• ® f� LOW otltlrf OFFICE 1••2oA7e • 2-4 DU/AC INDUSTRIAL LOW-MEDIUM PARK ...... . 5-8 DU/AC . . :... :•. ....... '" :•'• GENERAL • : ':: _ MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL .•: ! rf Ow f f tlf ■ a f tl •:is:. ® • ° 5-14 DU/AC • . tl r f r f r f r f r f f . r • r • vmnrnvm ::• � frfrorfooser . +�;• GENEP,ALINDUS. • MED. HIGH RAIL SERVED 15-24 DU/AC �fj� HEAVY •::. . r . :: HIGH INDUSTRIAL ".. 25-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE ::: •s r •;•;•:•. ;;;. s;.• , .•;: = RESIDENTIAL :•: •"� = COMMERCIAL •:::.• •::I•::. 4 •:::::_ El OPEN SPACE _ x COMMUNITY _ — COMMERCIAL FLOOD CONTROL NEIGHBOHOOD LELA UTILITY CORR. COMMERCIAL INTERIM PLAN DRAFT PLAN Windrows/High Density Alternative Are , Office REQUEST: Commercial ONALYSIS: To encourage commercial at this location would increase traf-4c on Etiwanda Avenue and tend to change the entire character of tnot area. Related commercial uses are allowed within the designated Office category. RECOMMENDATION: Retain Draft General Plan Land Use Designation. APPLICANT: Frank 0. Strader AP4 227-181-38 ITEM NO. 1 1-ra'AT7GI4 MAP VERY LOW REGIONAL 2 DU/AC COMMERCIAL .. . . . . "�• "•" " " " ';; LOW wrsv OFFICE i'.2epp' 2-4 DU/AC - ® INDUSTRIAL - roar LOW-MEDIUM PARK 5-8 DU/AC ee GENERAL • • - MEDIUM14 INDUSTRIAL • " 5-14 DU/AC _ ':• •• GENERAL INDUS. MED. HIGH RAIL SERVED w . . wrwaarrrre•roa i • : 15-24 DU/AC p�.�� :.• aaoearearrrrr ::.•:: ! r///� HEAVY • w eeoaoererrarr . . . . • • r�� aeaesaoerwrarr .•:.�:; INDUSTRIAL . . reaaroaeaearr . . . . . .. HIGH • • �� • • a�e�fir„�r r r o ' °• 25-30 DU � • /A �•C HILLSIDE COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL •:: E ;": : •:::::. .: :: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY ••::: •::w . ::: ' " • • " • ` COMMERCIA FLOOD CONTROL - ��`�,� ��••��� - L NEIGHBOHOOD UTILITY CORR. COMMERCIAL INTERIM PLAN PLAN Windrows Low Density Res. (2-4 du/a. )_ REQUEST: Neighborhood Commercial ANALYSIS: Refer to analysis for item No. RErOMMENDATION: Retain Draft General Plan Land Use Designation APPLICANT: Andrew Barmakian APT 227-111-10 & 26 Y q ITE6'oll NO. 2 7` LLCM-70^! MAP (- VERY LOW REGIONAL 'T'" • • ' - • •:r •+?r•• L�=1 2 DU/AC COMMERCIAL LOW . o e OFFICE 2-4 DU/AC e a " ".�:• INDUSTRIAL . .e • •. . . :..�. ` " ""• • `• LOW-MEDIUM PARK. 5-8 DU/AC GENERAL MEDIUM INDUSTRIfi,L 5-14 DU/AC o GENERAL INDUS. ��::::: MED. HIGH RAIL SERVED 15-24 DU/AC �f)� HEAVY _ • ✓�ff� HIGH INDUSTRIAL . ':.•.:•: •. ::' m a r e w e e w r w w `• '�'• 25-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE memeeeemerare : •:^•: oemereewooero . .`. . . . ® R`cSIDENTI.AL osmreoeceremew . • • • •• memeeoeemwwre ::,':::: COMMERCIAL eceraoorwrerww . . . w a r a a a r w • �,-` OPEN SPACE : COMMUNITY •:<":: • COMMERCIAL -_- • • • • • • • ^ • • • _ FLOOD CONTROL_ •: •:: •Y• :4 . .• � p(. o .•:;; _ NEIGHBOHOOD — UTILITY CORK. • " • ' COMMERCIAL N :: _ :•:- -`• ' -- DRAFT PLAN AN INTERIM PL, Alternative Area Low Density Res. (2-4 du/a. ) REQUEST: Commercial NALYSIS: Refer to analysis for Item No. 1 RECOMMENDATION: Designation Retain Draft General Plan Land Use Desi � . 9 i APPLICANT: Elden Bainbridge APE 227-181-20 ITEM NO. 3 1[X r4 F7 r VERY LOW REGIONAL •... . .":.:•: L� 2 DU/AC COMMERCIAL LOW OFFICE a • o . . .� f: 2-4 DU/AC aae 20 .*. INDUSTRIAL LOW-MEDIUM PARK folios 5-8 DU/AC • e GENERAL MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL ww 5-14 DU/AC go GENERAL INDUS. MED. HIGH RAIL SERVED • = 15-24 DU/AC HEAVY ::•:•; HIGH INDUSTRIAL ■ e w wee w w w wee w • •: e ofw w w e e e m e o e o �•":,.; ® 25-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE wwwweowwo sww . , . . . " RESIDENTIAL wsewwwoews w . . . .� . • oewwoweswow " . . . �� 01 " • COMMERCIAL • OPEN SPACE •1 I • •• .�;;: •: ��~ . COMMUNITY •:::% �r COMMERCIAL FLOOD CONTROL • • • • _ I � COMMERCIAL UTILITY CORR. :::. :-�"=="�• — �-_._r.� i -•- COMMERCIAL I r+ " • ` - =•= = DRAFT PLAN Alternative Area Low Den:.ity Res. (2-4 du/a.) , REQUEST: Commercial — ANALYSIS: Refer to analysis for Item No. I. RECOMMENDATION: Retain Draft General Plan Land Use Designation i APPLICANT: Wallace Siegel* APE 227-171-6 * This request was made in person at a -�•� w,y°� recent Planning Commission hearing ITEM No. 4 No letter was submitted. l �q T7ph( Mf} I•.. ..•.{ VERY L(;W REGIONAL .,,•.,� •ro.wsi L 1 2 DU,.AC COMMERCIAL Iby •:::.::::: LOW CFFICE N F . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • :. • • 2-4 DU 'AC :•::::.•:. .... INDUSTRIAL . . . . ;• ; LOW-ME)IUM ® PARK •'• ........... .. GENERAL • MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL v:::::�:::•. ;• ;. 5-14 I U/AC m raj • • • . . . . . ,= �,�- L �/`�"/� GENERAL INDUS. «� :ti•:• ; MED. I IIGH RAIL SERVED 15-24 DU/AC HEAVY •:• HIGH INDUSTRIAL d 125-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE .... "" ✓ COMMI.NITY . ✓r�✓: COMMI RCIAL • • • • • • • • • • • ' ' ' ' • ' ® � FLOOD CONTROL • w ' w • e • • ■ " • ` • j�� NEIGI BOHOOD UTILITY CORR. y • �•.-�-'� L' - COMMI RCIAL IN —ZIP LAY DRAF•' Pt. IN Windrows Low Den! ity Res. (2-4 du/a.) REQUEST: Commercial —- WALYSIS: Etiwanda Avenue's special boulevard character should ba Dreseri,ed and if commercial were allowed -it would increase traffic and change the character of that area. Conmer.ikl opportunities in Etiwanda should be more centra ly loctted and should be evaluated through the proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Retain Draft General Plan Land Use Designation APPLICANT. Reginald Bell* and Robert C. Flocker _ APE 227-131-24 23, 25, 26, 27 ,-20 _ *Request made a Planning Commission hearing. No letter has been submitted. ���EM ��. 5 � I I � MAP P VER'f LOW REUIONAL - I ::::a COMMERCIAL E ? LOW s; OFFICE it •2oGb' -_ —= 2-4 DU/AC _— — INDUSTRIAL — — _ — LOW-MEDIUM _  PARK 5-3 DU/AC j GENERAL • •'st_.. _;,' MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL 5-14 DU/AC ® al GENERAL INDUS. M-0 G. . HIGH RAIL SERVED 2 .. 15-�4 DU A• C HEAVY ......... HIGH INDUSTRIAL • _ - 25-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE • A RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL OPEN SP9CE • ——— ,�' COMMUNITY { COMMERCIAL FLOOD CONTROL toll NEIGHBOHOOD UTILITY CORP.. INTERIM PLAN COMMERCIAL DRAFT PLAN _ Low Density Residential Low nencity RPc (2-4 du/a ) REQUEST: Commercial frontage and remainder Medium Density (5-14 du/a. ) ANALYSIS: Commercial on Highland would not be appropriate and would require special design treatment such as a frontage road. The medium density may be appropriate, however the problems associated with buffering and transition should raise some concern. it should be noted that the original submittal description was somewhat E inaccurate. The property is not adjacent to the flood control property I on the east, but adjacent to existing single family homes. It appears that the property is adjacent of the flood control property on the south. (see additional exhibit attached) RECOMMENDATION: I Because of the proximity of this site to the proposed high school and the lack of data in design of the high school site at this time, change to any designation more intense than 2-4 du/ac would be inappropriate. i APPLICANT: James Thompson AP 227-071-12 ITEM No. 6 d.� 8tl�'`K.;,�i '�`''•�,a•:�'t�.. . ')17�t•,a i. .lCR�..x+�l�._y.... ... -. .�. i�--, i Ah 4t-v p��J1r�. •1 "L}N�.T1d�rVn i 1 rp Q!4 nay WL l � t —u v Ova ... � .:`1. M/•.,..,_. 1 _ b w a � O --------' mil ji� y _ 5 I\ { '4n /:k , _ VERY LOW REGIONAL 2 DVAC COMMERCIAL .....:: ::: ': �•_ _ ffm IN LOW •�•� L°FICE 10=2peal mm® ,�,� 0 smawwaft` 2-4 DU/AC �•; ;;, .......... ® INDUSTRIAL " LOW-MEDIIM PARK -. - - -- -.. LD.• _-_- • GENERAL .._... ___ , MEDIUM [iJJ1d INDUSTRIAL *� 11. __ -)y 5-14 DU/AC ".' •"" _ :fir GENERAL INDUS. MED. HIGH RAIL SERVED J 15-14 DU/AC .•.�.._',.� HEAVY HIGH INDUSTRIAL 25-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE ' RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL a OPEC' SPACE COMMUNITY — _ COMMERCIAL FLOOD CONTROL NEIGHBOH000 UTILITY CORR. INTERIM PLAN• COMMERCIAL DRAFT PLAN Windrows Low Density k,�s. (2-4 du/ac. ) REQUEST: Neighborhood Commercial or High Density Res. (25-30 du/ac. ) ANALYSIS: Commercial would not bd appropriate adjacent to residential area. higher density residential could be a consideration adjacent to Freeway and rail service but may tend to change character of area. RECOMMENDATION: Retain Draft General Plan Designation APPLICANT: Ralph Kleinman APE 227-141-42, 45, 65, 66 u ITEM NO, 7 1GCRT70t�1 MA ( ( VERY LOW REGIONAL •«;• r r r r r e r m i i- r m :;;;•. L-1 2 DU/AC COMMERCIAL ° . ® ererrrrrrtiarr . . . . . . . rrreaserrrrrrrwer . • . • • • • - m„r r w.:r�:m+r::.r r • •• � LOW "mri OFFICE 1°=2oLp ` 2-4 DU/AC ® LOW-MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL •;°°:; PARK •«;� 1 5-8 DU/AC • • • •: •:: — GENERAL '• • = MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL . •O • • 0 • • . _ •.•;Y i �' :. .• ° ::=• _ «; . • GENERAL INDUS. 11-24HDU/AC IGH PAIL SERVED ® _ — HEAVY HIGH INDUSTRIAL ell __ ••;; 25-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE 00 • • _-- ° • • • F RESIDENTIAL •'�• —_ ° 1 COMMERCIAL _ — = " " • " E'-' OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY 'X v COMMERCIAL FLOOD CONTROL COMMERCIAOD UTILITY CORR. INTERIM PLAN DRAFT PLAN Service Commercial Medium Density Res (5-14 du/ac. ) REQUEST:_Commercial NALYSIS: Presently, only the frontage along Foothill is zoned commercial . Commercial here and on adjacent requests would create strip commercial. A neighborhood commercial designation is located on the southeast corner of Foothill and Etianda. * There appeared to be a great deal of discussion in this vicinity at the last Planning Commission meeting. Because of the differing land uses in that area, we have conducted a field survey and plotted the existing use or. the entire intersection. In addition, we have provided exhibits showing the parcel lines, existing zoning, Interim General. Plan Land Use Designation and the Sedway/Cooke General Plan designation. It is readily apparent from the exhibits that there is a mixture of uses in the area without much evidence of preplanning. RECOMMENDATION: It would be our recommendation that one ten acre neighborhood commercial site be designated on either the northwest or northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue with all other land u�2s as proposed by Sedway/Cooke to remain as proposed; to do otherwise would be encouraging strip commercial along Foothill Boulevard. Aft APPLICANT: Carl Schiro 229-031-10 AP-` 227-221-T5. 7, 22 227-211-4. S. I ITEM No. 8 _ •« - - cy VERY LOW REGIONAL • • see/ / • r m's i r�ii i e P' • • 2 DU AC COMMERCIAL . . . . . . • • /�/ Y r O��r�� �+ r r m • •• LOW /e'e OFFICE :�• E �• 2-4 DU/AC ^- ""•`""""'`• c(��cc LOW-MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL •;;;•""•'— L. PARK . . . • • • — 5-8 DU/AC • • • • �fjJj� GENERAL MEDIUM 5-14 DU/AC 1NDU5TRIAL " " . . • _ « « . GENERAL INDUS. —' MED. HIGH RAIL SERVED '• — — 15-24 DU/AC HEAVY •�• HIGH INDUSTRIAL ® 25-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE • = =�= I COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL � OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY El COMMERCIAL FLOOD CONTROL NEIGHSOH000 � UTILITY CORR. I'NTcRn i r�nry .. • • • • • . • t.-.--�. COMMERCIAL DRAFT PLAN Sarvice Commercial Medium Density Res. (5-14 du/ac.) REQUEST: Commercial ANALYSIS: Refer to analysis on Item No. 8. RECOMMENDATION: See recommendation Item 8 4 �l APPLICANT: Michael G. Scarlata APe 227-221-26, 27 ITEM NO. 9 tiP.. TLa_ 1rX-fk';7 ?N MA VERY LOW ( REGIONAL 2 DU/AC COMMERCIAL .. I LOW aff OFFICE • 2-4 • • wwrewrrawaer • � • ��`� INDUSTRIAL . . . . . ;; rwaraewweeare . . . + . r r r r w e a r a U r w a r w LOW-MEDIUM ewreee • • +• • • PARK w rrrawe • • • • • • ® rarwawre a • • ••,•; 5-8 DU/AC r„w!a r meow 0�e 0 i m """" • , , �ff/,� GENERAL e MEDIUM L��////11i�1 INDUSTRIAL •,•;; 5-.14 DU/AC 9401�•'.� 0. GENERAL INDUS. -41 •:;:: _ ......:I MED. HIGH RAIL SERVED • • +•_— 15-24 DU/AC HEAVY ® • •••' •. HIGH INDUSTRIAL 25-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL — — COMMERCIAL OPE14 SPACE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL. FLOOD CONTROL •. .. • • + NEIGH130HOOD UTILITY CORR. COMMERCIAL INTERIM PLAN DRAFT PLAN Service Commercial Medium Density Res. (5-14 du/ac.) ®REQUEST: Commercial 41NALYSIS: Refer to analysis on Item No. 8 RECOMMENDATION: See recommendation Item 8 APPLICANT: Victor DiCario AP-° 227-221-23 ITEM NO. lo Z N r fc Z .a q ;I \ 1 s1 nl I 1 �1 I 1� I• s ". - r� 4� leep \ I •al I � I . I •. a , 1 �� I w � , i I � t •_• � w 1 �:� �"F - I I � _`- I^"rMru � .. `� ~ � . 1 •JIy I 1 w ! w I e _ ` O I IIwEO •: _� +. t �L IA1 a � f_y�\�j�µJ� ' 61II � L ._ R�' ® 4�5 •. � w 1 r. I . � v I L. 2 wll r I i p � I I I ! i 4 n Ce9 8.•-t J_i m �- : - �� - ; { I. i RCS ,)• s''`�t � 41 ROl to •� `�' ��I'i:l;�� :�. � r,],S, S rE: I LRa xf.. aI �` ice' •II • I. � � —3 � �� o` Y L I 6 • �4 t: ..• � '- •, r j •`y:ia'�T•- 4 _ iqa�9'.v 1NfrUi.YOT —j�>-p2 11 ;r� �K=-- _ -J lyi \•. I1 . �rMl - ' .� ` wl j � , I Iv lwl � f I - • � _ 1 I i. 1 11 G o © _i a kO l• 1 ! 'w� '. t l x ltx ' W � - 8 w•�4 1 - i � a : x p i - �e 1 %� � � ` 'alj' • I 1 I I I I I — E i '. ' • wiw it 1 . I.� Is I . G •� kQ �f^q I`I. I 1 � I I I I I I I I Y rr �•- � I � r r b • ryMllC I —T Mt.MP•. C1.,.I:r.:{�f_ g Sr '• -T`-1—-... .l 8 `�e, -. rT '� �i � ::I•i.�-,_ia_� 17•' 1 Rib 1 iA r. ( ,`.,4r x}. i 10 1 1 i I f j R __•�v � i 4b y`I �•� q i n �� �: q 1 II i.Ll-...�' .MI q A'IF.GIIe__i:_=-_ C mgll rl �..�r ^' �I • I Q �9 'I t cR f •I Q 1 I II • � It I e 1 n 1 •aY K. � � � � � � ;� E I 1 1 1 K _.LL )MI _J � 0 UOKI i 1UlKY/t � I U • I K I c I Is I I II • 1 IT • � q �� I ® j II— y--I K I s I K r •_ e I O • p TA py� •.K.MM1 ', —_•E Q`-\_If— ( E-_ II 1 ai m /. .I to I f aJl Q • PII O .II • 1 N •• v,� 1 0' IMK Sj� . @ ! all 0 �'----1-�'�_• b� �' to G I 1 , • •1 •.KYM1 Is. II T Ili i 1;1 II V •.l•K l� •KI I 1 _ I -__--. rs 171 d_-._-_�.-y- n Q� I • arel r 6J `.' 1I rwKYn roc 'f 3 •vr C.Y/L i s �l ® •O 'O � O.MK. ♦NK. ANK. !%K. ...•. ... • ..- -�.r-��1aS�- _ - I 1 l.v uYL EUK At E �•(V[�� :iGl bKl IIw61 i .I. • . • • i .� • . . .�.1.4 : - 21 "!''I VVV ,i"' 1/J -�-1/t1 f.11.1 ulK � 1 i f� L-.�`'�'_-__ i •,I.I_I_L�. •l:!-r I � I: ,l 1 =r :..._ice-�--=: ® -•-<"=" x I 40 r G' >••�Ilr•' •�K IbGI EOrE a©K Qvy I I 0 w • .r RWr�ly._.� A T e .lilt1' .y\ llu AC, mtAc w/L � 16 • II M le I S 1 1e I Z-4-- 2.221 I A.34AV --4-63 ---I ----a -- I e 0 - —I .j\! C� e f 1 4C.4/L 40 „ I Por. - ;-- 12- 5229AC. 2rr a �• 13 w sr a • yip� fee AC. 2 i l I K � o � 12 rlr 1L. lA� 5 b 9.1 AC w/L 9.24 AC7 aCA � t - -i - jrAISM I 1 5T]Ac YYT AC.4/L hL I 2n ZJT�— - � _ � • • M -. � I TRILL s ---' --- ._ _ HOULEVARO - :•—FOOTHILL 2.5TAC O O U p T �_ - • -• . _ . LOpK. 2.StAq Le1At. 1.NAC. Q 17 6 1.C1AC. ,1OCAC, , 1 y I JPAC (?ACJ f[]aC) N.S aCJ ( AC., 0 •SY I 1 1j 10 I Ie AC., - f IOAC •.T.. '— �-- ...A. na..A an.. _gin. ...� is �•� .o w Ie MAC I J C HEet Par.2 t•AC ]]Be 4C U Q�3 2l�AC t I Z ; -�I R E -6 R } aCpa a4.a •_ � I _ •.• a4.'S iui.1�T'u.O hal 4. FvI 1 CISalT iv aper'.`fYl 'TII ' .� e1r r S~ ,'� ♦ ; I I. I I 1 •1 11 I i _ � I I 11 I It n�J. u � ___ � p � I I w r / 1 1 ; '• I rl 1 .♦ I " Ir i La : i ._ - _ .:� I - - 1�A >. I � I I *nr I •.y I I I � I I I ti _c�_. f a i >: KU l;]': i__ _ '_ a' t ,.� li � I I I ! ' i �• •I I � •;:�, I I ^`" ,a ! o'i +. 124 c,w I a n: I c K II/ -t 6 'r.!.i `fir: I_'_- I '_ Lip,, r.�U- �. J.I• ^�bfs�= * ,sy~ ' 1 ..Q. � R n x F .� _ p Zp ? ,AO I)': 1 I w ] I I } _ � fit:•ti".':.: ,- :.. G` .. �. ®�7:w.tom. . . . . , VE2YDU/NC REGIONAL • < COMMERCIAL " " ' • �� LOW OFFICE 2-4 DU/AC "• {a-^� ® INDUSTRIAL LOW-MEDIUM PARY. 5-8 DU/AC GENERAL MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL / 5-14 DU/AC GENERAL INDUS_ B - MED. HIGH RAIL SERVED _ 15-24 DU/AC HEAVY ® INDUSTRIAL 25-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FLOOD CONTROL NEIGHBOHOOD UTILITY CORR. J--� +--=--? COMMERCIAL INTERIM PLAN " • c " „ � • , ' DRAFT PLAN Minimum Impact Industry Industrial Park IOEQUEST: Commercial NALYSIS: Related commercial is allowed in Industrial Park. Both the Sedway/Cooke and Blayney Plans are consistent. Introduction of commercial center or retail uses would disrupt integrity of industrial park area. RECOMMENDATION: Retain Draft General Plan Land Use Desijnation APPLICANT: Sebastian Masi AP6 229-011-10, 21. 25. 27. 28 ITEM NO. v7` e.. VERY LOW REGIONAL .. 2 DU/AC COMMERC IAL Yew : ® ° . w . . e • 1 Y . • . . 1 1 . 1 e w 1 •� • 1 . 1 w . w 1 .w] • w I w °1 . . 1 .• • w 111 . ♦ e . .l _ _ � • • ^ •• • • • • !0W • ■ OFFICE • • • w . + . e w . . 1 • Y • r is --_- :• • " • . . . . DU/AC " •+ :°«:° INDUSTRIAL _ LOW-MEDIUM i':/,I PARK .............. .. . - . . . ::.:a 5-8 DU/AC ... - . . . ." . . . . GENERAL " " • ' ° " " " MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL ................... 5-14 DU/AC •� - GENERAL INDUS_ ® E� �'� MED. HIGH RAIL SERVED ::::::t 15-24 DU/AC py�)j HEAVY �//�® •::: HIGH INDUSTRIAL _ « 25-3 0 DU/AC HILLSIDE - _ . RESIDENTIAL -_ •. COMMERCIAL '."' a®��o ari�w " OPEN SPACE is : = y.` G - �_ ;•s�•o a�•�o r' COMMUNITY �::::::: : � � � COMMERCIAL - - ;;•.;;;, • , FLOOD CONTROL •• • • '• • • " • "' ° �� NEIGHBOHOOD UTILITY CORR. COMMERCIAL INTERIM PLAN DRAFT PLAN Low Density Res. Medium Density Res. (5-14 du/ac. ) RE:;UEST: Commercial NALYSIS: Site is too large for commercial development and is not the best location, to serve the surrounding area. The inclusion of commercial here would constitute a spot designation. RECOMMENDATION: Retain Draft General Plan Land Use Designation APPLICANT: Raveewan Kanckvechayant APe 227-091-38 ITEM NO. 13 t;. LOC'4. _ LE VERY LOW f REGIONAL °' • • ' • • 2 DU/ACd COMMERCIAL ;• _ LOW ■� OFFICE . V ° 2-4 DU/AC INDI JSTRIA'• - •i°a i a LOW-MEDIUM�.; — a sa� • . PARK 5-8 DU/AC GENERAL MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL • • • 5-14 DU/AC ° • �, GENERAL INDUS. •••; • • ;:::::::I MED. HIGH RAIL SERVED 15-24 DU/AC • •: •; ::e'.::: HEAVY o •^:f — :: : HIGH INDUSTRIAL . . .. . .�:: ;:••-••••- 25-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE COMMERCIAL - �� `� • ' °• � • •��••��•�•• RESIDENTIAL • ••• �• ••'• GOIf OPEN SPACE E ;: •Cou COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FLOOD CONTROL J NEIGHBOHOOD UTILITY CORR. INTERIM PLAN • �-=--� COMMERCIAL DRAFT PLAN Mixed Use & Medium Residential Offi R Ink aP nci Y—s—�4 du/ac. ) REQUEST: Medium Density (5-14 du/ac ) on rear portion of Property ANALYSIS: A copy of the Assessor's map for the area in question is attached. Referen:e is map to stub streets. The low density is a logical extension of area development and the higher density's would be isolated and inappropriate. RECOMMENDATION: Retain Draft General Plan Land Use Designation i' r' APPLICANT: Andrew Rarmakian APB 208-331-18. lQ t�" ITEM NO. 12 _ .� R e e 0 0 e Y e e 0 • • � e 0 0 r Y e e Y w 'J+ e0Y eeee wY q — .•.` wewrYweew ..........-- . ,� LOW ri: OFFICE 4 DU/AC ;; „•.`::: INDUSTRIAL • ` • • • • • • • ' LOW-MEDIUM PARK •::•::::•`:: 5-8 DU/AC . . . . . . . .. . .: . . • • • • • • . • • - • • • GENERAL • • O 4 - 1 w • :w • w •::::.•.:•:. w•::. • • - • • • • • • • • ` • =• ` • " MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL •::::::. 5-14 DU/AC GENERAL TNDUS. �_ MED. HIGrl RAIL SERVED ` 15-24 DU/AC M HEAVY HIGH INDUSTRIAL ® 25-30 DU/AC HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FLOOD CONTROL NEIGHBOIiGOD UTILITY CORR, COMMERCIAL INTERIM PI-AN DRAFT PLAN Alternative Area Office REQUEST: High Density Residential (Ps-3n d,l/ar) ANALYSIS: — Either the current designation, or the one proposed would be appropriate at the sight in question. However, the current office designation would be more compatible with the existing single family housing to the nor :h. RECOMMENDATION: ,c Retain Draft General Plan Land Use Designation ti f t APPLICANT: Don VaVerka "' AP= 227-152-18.31 LOW • j Vc2YDU/AC COMMERCIAL w , •.... 'r` :: �• LOW •e: OFFICE 2-4 DU/AC �....... .......... .._. ......o�..... .......... • '.• �Tf]in LOW-MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL 5-8 DU/AC® � - EDIUM PARK GENERAL •••••• • ••• �•• ••• :, :ti• MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL «•o::•; «•:• ......... ..........• .�:::::::::: 5-14 DU/AC w YYYro orY • ....: Y . . . . . .. . ::. •.1 __ rvwvwwm .f/`resin//j GENERAL INDUS. • • •� ' " • ........... ''�' �• - •- G RAIL SERVED P w r w 1 • w 1 • w Y r • :�� •< p y • • • • •. e(�p = 15-24 DU/AC k •'•:°•� . -_ HEAVY HIGH INDUSTRIAL . . . . . . . r . . '• :••. 25-30 AC (�• HILLSIDE e YY . r . YY • tJ •:YaY•r• RESID• • • • • • �•• ENTIAL ' COMMERCIAL _ OPEN SPACE ';° r,.r. COMMUNITY •••• • f�� COMMERCIAL - - • FLOOD CONTROL ` s's NEIGHSOHOOD � UTILITY CORR. INTERIM PLAN -.. COMMERCIAL DRAFT PLAN Windrows Low Residential (7-4 di�jar) REQUEST: Medium D n itv RQsid ntial (5 14 dif/ar) NALYSIS: (Request was made in person at January 26, 1981 meeting; no letter has been submitted. ) The area is predominctely surrounded by Low Density Residential Land Use category. The Etiwanda t;ommunity has expressed its desire not to have higher density in this area. RECOMMENDA PION: Retain the Low Density Residential Land Use Designation as shown on the Draft General Plan Land Use Map. APPLICANT: Bob Lawr n^ AP" 227•-121-30.43 ITEM N®. ,5