No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/02/05 - Agenda Packet � ' I. � 1 .. . .` �, �:1 r �1 1 .pi 1 � �' �� 1 r � I • 1 I .. y _ 1 M ,,� t� 1��,.,1 � , � I � , r /" I � y �� 1 W iV�__ 1 I 11 1 1 �� �'� � + � � I � � I ,,,I, � ^11 IN Ili l ' . �,,{ 1d a t-'r 11 - 1 , y ,�; �,,,� �,.:,�, '..r. �/ I .;. . i 1' :,r',' ��� r �.�s. �i �;i;� �.'i' �c"' ti t : .,,., , 1r i' Ili r .'r.:. I� .'�i•.r '1 �� 1 � ♦.' � \VI , �: , � � , i r II It/1 !�J "r a/.���( -O �. . 1 �„ ' I,V i J� ''!vtM;� rn �, �, ,';�, , i ;� >I , ,: i „�:' °fir. � 'i` ii /l ,'., ,�1/ ' .�. 1 P 4 'Ih,: ,� 1 i' 1, ' � w; �.`. .,. 1: 1{y:�• ,' 'J ,L 1. M�•� :� :i i "K: o-. G�I.CA,%Jt) CITY OF RANCID CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDN 1977 THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1981. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE; RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Sceranka Commissioner King Commissioner Tolsto), Coyrnissioner. Rempel 60 Min. III. Recap - Victoria Plan To Date 30 Min. IV. Revisions to Victoria RE General Plan 15 Min. V. Break 60 Min. VI. Discussion '30 Min. VII. General Plan - E.I.R. kContinued from 2/2/81 ) VIll. Adjournment The Planning Commission will adjourn to Monday, February 9, 1981 , at 7 p.m. for the continued public hearing on the General Plan, at the Lion's Park Community Center. P y ' 9lf , , f — CITY OF RANCNO CUCAMONGA S.EkI A• REPORT P O - O E � Z DATE: February 2, 1981 > 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Plaq er SUBJECT: VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY - P.D. 80-01 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY Review of project to date ABSTRACT: As we all are aware, the Victoria Planned Community text and map has been with us for some time. Either under submittal or through an informal review process within the Community. As a reminder, there have been six meetings on Victoria. The dates are listed below: 9-16-80 - General kickoff meeting - establishment of review process 9-29-80 - Discussion of Land Use 10-11-80 - Discussion of Victoria and the Etiwanda Area 10-29-80 - Discussion of Circulation 11-10-80 - Discussion of parks and open space 11-24-80 - Discussion of review process and continuatico of review to January 1981 . This memo contains a listing of the items which has arisen at each of these meetings on Victoria. Also please find attached, all of the reports that have been prepared for the Victoria Planned Community. Recommendation will be to review all of the items listed to verify that all of the issues have been considered and to give guidance to the applicant as to the additional information required. We have also attached a proposed schedule to con- sideration for approval of Victuoria Planned Community.which the Commission should indicate their desires for finalization. DISCUSSION: To date, we have reviewed land use, circulation, parks and open space and have presented reports on infrastructure and design criteria. At each of the meetings on land use, circulation, parks and open space, there were suggested conditions included. The Commission, after reviewing each of the topics, there discussed each of the conditions suggested. In some cases, the conditions were modified and in others, conditions were added. In each of the meetings on the topics there were additional issues raised that were not answered by the text covered by conditions suggested or answered by the map. We have complied for the Commission's information and use, those issues that have been raised that have not yet beer. answered. 'fit: Victoria Planned Community _2_ February 2, 1981 LAND USE - Commercial usage along Etiwanda Avenue (already addressed by the Sedway/ Cooke General Plan) - More detailed and regional related uses i .e. types - Victoria Street not to connect to Etiwanda Avenue - Regional related uses to Etiwanda Avenue (some examples should be shown relative to site plans) - Buffering along Base Line Road, i.e. residential uses and commercial uses (example: site plans should be shown) - Landscape buffer at the Temple (mention was made when land adjacent to the Temple was thought to be within the planned community that there should be landscape buffering from any new use to the Temple. Now the Temple land is only contiguous to the planned community boundaries on the western property line) - Phasing of regional related uses from Foothill Boulevard north to Base Line Road - Treatment of Highland Avenue relative to architectural character and land- scape character to simulate the "rural atmosphere" - Precise planned community boundaries showing all property that is owned by William Lyon Company within the planned community and any other property that is consented to be a co-applicant - Adjustment of densities and land use patterns within the planned communities relative to General Plan changes - Density bonuses and affordable housing percentages CIRCULATION - Treatment of the emergency lane of traffic for Victoria parkway - Indication of what streets would be used for regional shopping center access - Efforts should be made to minimize traffic through the Etiwanda Community - Indicate a loop street plus or minus 1 ,000 feet from Etiwanda Avenue in ordar to take traffic off of Etiwanda Avenue t ; ;�.-:• a, Victoria Planned Community -2- February 2, 1981 ` PARKS AND OPEN SPACE - Indicate areas of lake usage for boating, fishing, etc. What about "con- e cession stands" around the lake. How will these be handled? - Will there be any trails to Etiwanda Avenue and from Etiwanda community i to the lake edge? Where will they be? Show examples. - How much land is contained within the lake edge and the lake itself. What about the issue of radiation from the power lines (this should be discussed in the draft environmental report). c. - What about the active parkland versus passive parkland? Advantages, dis- advantages of each. - What credit should be given for the lakes, for the trails, for any other open space usage. - Where should the additional five acres of park land go to, if still necessary after adjustments in the General Plan densities? - Where will the developer obtain the water to fill the lakes and to keep them at a reasonable level? We hope that we have gathered together all of the items which were discussed at the various neetings on Victoria Planned Community. The Commission should review each of the items listed above in the three categories, to determine if they are accurately represented and if all of the issues raised by the Commission are contained within the list. Our anticipation would be that at the February e, 26, 1981 meeting the applicant would have answered most, if not all of the issues contained within tiis report and Staff would have the opportunity to make recommendations on the applicant's proposals. We still have Infrastructure and Design, and Implementation and DEIR to review. It would be one suggestion that the Planning Commission reserve March 12, March 26, and April 9 to complete the Planning Commission reivew of the Victoria Planned Community. These meetings would be on Thrusday night beginning at 7:00 p.m. RECO14MENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission reivew the list contained within this report. Add or subtract to those lists as may be necessary, and clarify the items they wish to have brought back to them in the way of answers *r solutions for the February 26 special meeting. Also, it is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt March 12, March 26, and April t 9 as review dates for the completion of the review of Victoria Planned Community. BKH:cd F' Attachments 4 :i . . .: r,� �• C1'I'Y OF r RANCHO CUCAMONGA o ` _ o FLANNING COMMISSION .L"2`tiT F ,(�E �lT D-AL 1977 Monday, November 24, 1980 J LICY'S NARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,. RANCHO CUCAMONGA,-CALIECRNIA ,... x :I Pledge of Allegiance " 7 'fir , N{•, w, II. Roll Call " Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempel Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy� Commissioner Scerankara- III. Announcements - IV. Infrastructure - Staff Report V. Planning Commission Questions y ; VI. Developer Presentation or Questions of Developer r VII~. Design Standards - 3i.aff Reporf. ..s.:'.- - '" ,, ...pia { ! l • � '� ; �2 VIII. Planning Commission Questions °i f IX. - ' Developer Presentation and Questions ' X Public Comments � „ �"�} m r `� �;'r r .,J.,F r• Ttu is the time and place for the"genera] public 1 to address the Comrussion. Items to be di scos:-ed ''''here are those which do not already appear on this Agenda XI Adjournment" y c ' a� i �Y YAM` 1 I .l �'1 f ul •. , t •ij i ,x -t xv at.r , s f r'r' h � ., il r � lr f � +� it + , ',Ya�+N r �nv ,�:, ,'Sv+'?b, 1 •p:'µ. � ts! CSC" [ r ✓Kr� 4b E;,N�,,lk r'jl , y,�,,pt af+ ruY{fi �n+ 7r � I. a� , � 11 :��� $:' "� � ti li. `� �� �• r � r! y ff'y vl. ry�,ry{�e ,,Ci�", `. lF N�� "� + . { GG J aF'`•ry., r rn r-a+ T -fr -'rw'A. real w,.:ti{+ 'X'd•:� t1TI' OF RANUiO C��CONGA o ct%cn" �c o - o DATE: November 24, 1980 z U > TO: Members of the Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Barry K. Hogan, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Victoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria ABSTRACT_: This report covers the topics of Infrastructure and Design Cri- teria. Infrastructure refers to the public services that must be provided to the project such as sewers, water, natural gas, electricity, telephone, flood control and fire. Des`.gn Criteria encompasses Victoria Parkway, land- scape standards, solar access, site planning standards, landscape grading standards, and road standards. As with previous reports, after the dis- cussion of each topic, there are suggested conditions for the Commission. DISCUSSION - INFRASTRUCTURE Much of the discussion of infrastructure topics are listed in the Draft Environmental Impact Report on pages 104-115. The Draft Environmental Im- pact Report discusses water supply, sewage disposal , telephone service, electrical service, gas service. Of parti'calar concern in the past has been the adequacy of sewer supply, The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) discusses several alternative plans for waste treatment and disposal . The Day Creek food control channel traverses through the project north to south. Currently, this channel is unimproved and no plans exist for im- provement in the near future. Pages 47-51 of the DEIR discusses the hy- drology and flood control for the Victoria area. The DEIR discusses the �. alternatives for accepting or diverting upstream flows, the alternatives for providing protection from a major levee outbreak during a major storm occurrence, alternative approaches for site drainage systems, and alter- native methods of funding flood control and drainage. The hydrology and flood control issues discussed within the DEIR indicate that there is a major concern with the flood control of the Day Creek channel . Prior to the submittal of the Victoria Plan, the City contracted with L. D. King to prepare a study of the Day Creek channel from its source in the foothills down its course into Rive'rsid.e County. Any solution of the drainage problem of Day Creek must be done on a regional-wide basis in- cluding the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City of Ontario, the Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside, and any developers which may contribute to the flow through the development of their property. Limited development can occur within the drainage area of Day Creek, but there must be appro- priate improvements to the Day Creek channel at the time of those develop- ments. Currently no solution has been selected as yet; however, the City Engineer is confident that a solution will be reached that is acceptable to all parties involved. The City Engineer will be available to comment a� on the flood control issue at the Monday night meeting. d' November 24, 1980 Victoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria Page Two The final topic Linder infrastructure is fire protection. Although fire protection is more of a community facility, its discussion fits best under infrastructure with the topics selected for review with Victoria. Fire- station No. 3 is located on Base Line Avenue east of Rochester Avenue in a temporary station on County-owned property leased by the Foothill Fire Protection District. The DEIR on page 79 indicates, under impact summary, that new fire facilities will be planned and located based upon adopted plans for Victoria and adjacent properties. Fire protection will be a mz': >r concern in this development due to the recent financial situation which the Foothill Fire Protection District finds 'Itself in. Special consideration and care should be given to the provision of adequate fire services for this development and existing development in the vicinity. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS 1 . The developer shall participate through financial contributions and/or construction of storm drain facilities within the Day Creek and that drainage area in accordance with a to be adopted master plan for Day Creek. Development will be allowed to take place within the drainage area so long as flood protection is provided by the developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and/or the San Bernardino Flood Control District. 2. Prior to any substantial development in any of the four villages, an alternative for sewage treatment shall be selected by the City and the Cucamonga County Water District. 3. Adequate fire protection through either expansion of Fire Station No. 3 or the addition of another fire station or the relocation of the existing fire station shall be provided by the Foothill Fire District with the expansion, addition or relocation costs paid for by the developer. DESIGN CRITERIA Under the discussion of Design Criteria, there are six categories: Victoria Parkway, landscape standards, solar access standards, site planning standards, landscape grading standards, and road standards. vICTORIA PARKWAY Page 127 of the Victoria Community Plan text describes fully the basic design concept for Victoria Parkway. Victoria Parkway is the key element for the overall plan for the planned community. It is provided as a continuous open space element that ties together the fragmented parcels of land that currently exist within the planning area. The parkway is a linear park that is proposed to have a two-lane road within it. The right-of-way of the parkway varies in accordance with the adjacent land uses. Pages 128-129 of the text give the basic design concepts for the parkway. Where the parkway passes adjacent to open sapces, the right-of-way will narrow. Where the parkway passes adjacent to residential areas, the parkway right-of-way will widen. The minimum width of right-of-way is 120 feet with the maximum width of right-of-way, 180 feet. Y November 24, 1980 Victoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria Page Three The parkway includes a bike trail , hiking trail and equestrian trail . Relative to the planting concept, the plan proposes three basic trees: pines, which will be located on the high ground, sycamores, as a transition tree, and alders on the low ground. Of the three trees proposed, the pines are the only evergreen. The use of the alders on the low ground will be remi- niscent of a riparian area ?s would be the sycamort:: . Victoria Parkway is not proposed to be a flat roadway but will be a split level road with one direction lower than the other. direction, -thus providing added interest and taking up grade at the same time. Pages 130-131 of the text indicate in detail the planting concept and the grading concept. For a more precise Indication of right-of-way width, please refer to pages 134-135 of the text. It should be noted that the median island in Victoria Parkway contains an equestrian trail . The text does not indicate that the equestrian trail will begin at Deer Creek, but we believe that it is the developers intent, thus, providing a connection to the regional trail system. The equestrian trail at each intersection transitions to the street corner for crossing within the crosswalks to be provided at the signalized intersections. Where there are no signalized intersections, the equestrian trail will cross mid-street. The trail in the median will continue on Victoria Parkway to two outlets. One will be Victoria Street outletting to Etiwanda Avenue and the other will be the Pacific Electric right-of-way, a proposed master planned trail . The text only indicates the outlet onto Victoria Street, but in conversations with the developer, he indicates there is no problem in extending the trail to the Pacific Electric right-of-way. Pages 144-149 illustrate the typical edge conditions and cross sections for Victoria Parkway. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS 1 . The equestrian trail contained within Victoria Parkway shall begin at Deer Creek and terminate at the Pacific Electric right-of-way. Specific design of the trail shall be subject to City review. Equestrian fences, grading, soil samples, may be required. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS The applicant proposes to use drought-resistant plan material where possible. Windrow style planting to accentuate the traditional windrow character of Etiwanda and to provide protection from wind and an Entry Hierarchy Plan in order to provide a sense of place, and of transition from one land use to another. The Entry Hierarchy Plan is contained on pages 156-157 of the text. Typical edge conditions are depicted on pages 160-167. Particular concern is with the Milliken-Highland-Base Line-Foothill sections and residential land uses. There is an indication of a median within the street; however, no indication of any trees within that median. Both the section and the r, planned view lack trees within the median. We would suggest that either y:? November 24, 1980 Victoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria Page Four accent trees be added within the median or street trees at appropriate spacing . The section of land uses indicates an 8 foot minimum foot minimum for peri- meter landscape treatment in parking areas. We suggest that 10 feet is a more appropriate standard. Additionally, the second graphic on page 160 on the bottom right-hand corner needs to have an indication of where the property line is. On page 161 , on the northern section of Day Creek Blvd., the street median should depict trees. On the south section, the landscaped area from the parking lot to the property line should be 10 feet not the 8 feet shown. On page 162 the same comment on the Miller-Victoria loop for the median and the parking lot. On page 163, the section depicted indicates that there will be a natural equestrian trail in the median from Victoria Groves Park to Victoria Street. It should indicate from Deer Creek through Victoria Groves Park to Victoria Street and to the Pacific Electric right-of-way. SOLAR ACCESS STANDA.^!DS - :3ITE PLANNING STANDARDS The solar access standards illustrate the desirable site plan relationships in providing passive solar access to residential dewllings within the Vic- toria Planned Community. RESIDENTIAL SITE PLANNING STANDARDS Pages 180-19G depict the various types of A, B, C, D. E, and F, Residential Land Uses. Each are typical examples and do not necessarily represent the precise development for any particular area but a concept. Page 184, B land use, minimal lots 7200 square feet, indicates a 4-foot walk on one side only within that land use. Throughout the B land uses there is listed a 4-foot walk on one side only. The Commission may wish to consider this issue to determine whether or not sidewalks should be on both sides or only on ore side of the street. Additionally, you may want to make your decision in accordance with the minimum square footages proposed. Throughout pages 184-196, we have suggested additions and changes to add consistency in each of the typical concepts rather than list these twice for the Planning Com- mission, wp will list them in the suggested conditions. Some additional items which the Commission may wish to consider are the re- location of these pariicular graphic concepts to the Part III Regulations and Standards section. The reason for this suggestion is that many of the explanations detailed on each of the pages contained within the residential site planninG standards arP repeated in Part III of the text. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS 1 . Page 184, add the word minimum in the setbacks paragraph under "garage" . 2. Page 185, the paragraph setbacks under side yard, add the wo^ds " "each side" . The new phrase would read "side yard; 5-foot minimum each side." vr`i: November 24, 1980 Victoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria Page Five 3. Page 186, directly under the graphic, the words variable height fence by developer on Victoria Parkway property line should indicate that fence height shall not exceed 5 feet from the highest finished rg ade. 4. Under setbacks garage, add the words "requires garage door openers" after 5-8 feet and add the word "minimum" after 18 feet. 5. Under side yard indicate 5-foot for each side Yard rather than 10 feet between buildings. 6. On page 187 indicate ir. paratheses under the graphic after the phrase developer to provide fencing on corner lots and adjacent to community trail system "(see page 189)". 7. Under setbacks, garage, add the words "requires garage doer openers" after 5 to 8 feet. Also indicate what width sidewalks and location of said sidewalks. 8. Page 188, indication of minimum parking requirements may require a change in tine Rancho Cucamonga Parking Ordinance. Should the ordinance not change, the indication of minimum parking standard should be amended to be consistent with current code requirements. Also there is no indication of the kinds of sidewalks or location of sidewalks. 9. Page 188 under setbacks garage, add "requires garage door openers" after 5 to 8 feet. 10. Page 189, the second note from the top of the page add the words "5-foot maximum" so the phrase will read, 5-foot maximum back yard fence adjacent to trail by developer. 11 . Page 189, the second note from the top of the page add the words 5-foot maximum" so the phrase will read, 5-foot maximum back yard fence adjacent to trail by developer . 12. Page 190 under garage setback, add "requires garage door openers" after 5 to 8 feet and add the words "or sidewalk" after curb so the phrase will read garage setback: 5 to 8 feet (requires garage door openers) from back of curb or sidewalk. The indication under garage setback of the parking requirement is in excess of what current code requirements are and should indicate code requirements. 13. Page 193 under the graphic indicates minimum of one covered parking space per dwelling, additional spaces as specified in Part III . This requirement is different from the existing parking code and should be consistent. 14. Under the graphic there is an indication where sound attenuation walls are required they may not be needed to be continuous but may work satisfactorily when broken or staggered. The words "however, in all cases these must be consistent with the adopted Noise Or- dinance" should be added. November 24, 1990 Victoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria Page Six 15. Rage 196 under the first graphic. the words "automatic garage door openers required" should be added after 5 to 8 feet. LANDSCAPE GRADING STANDARDS The applicant proposes contour grading and grading of open space to create views.and take up grade. All of the graphics illustrated on pages 202-206 are of excellent depiction of the kinds of grading standards that are pro- mulgated by the Grading Committee and the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga . ROAD STANDARDS Or. pages 212-215 the applicant proposes road standards for Victoria Planned Community. Except for Victoria Parkway, the road standards for Victoria should be consistent with the road standards for other areas within Rancho Cucamonga . The City Engineer will present at the Monday night meeting, the proposed standards for roads within Rancho Cucamonga. SUGGESTED CONDITION: All road standards shall conform to those of the City of Rancho Cucamonga except for Victoria Parkway. CONCLUSION As a reminder to the Planning Commission, the suggested conditions contained within this report are not refined to the point where they can be specifically applied to Victoria Planned Community. Tney are to be used as a guide for staff in preparing final conditions for consideration by the Planning Com- mission when the review process culminates. In order for staff to have ade- quate direction to proceed on to the next categories and to prepare final conditions for consideration, we would recommend, if the Commission concurs with the suggested conditions, that they be adopted to provide for staf"s preparation of final conditions for consideration. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Res ectfull�y mitted, ARR //k. OGA ' CiVy lanner , BKH:jk U GC!L.CA;'Jn1, C. v^t` CITY OF RANCHO OUC..A.MONGA PLANNING COM1\4ISSION Z AGENDA U � 1977 MONDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1980 LION'S PARK COMMUNITY 'CENTER 9161 BAST LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl ✓ Commissioner Rempel ✓ . Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy J Commissioner Sceranka H±5 III. Public Hearing The following items are public hearings in which'' concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wsft to J\e recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. Ali such opinions shall be limited to S.minutes per .individual for each project_ A. VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY - 80-01 Overview of process to date - B. COMMISSION QUESTIONS AAA? ANSWERS C_ VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY - `80-01 Parks and Open Spaces a; . D. COMMISSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS E. PRESENTATION BY THE DEVELOPER IV. Public Comment V. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrae.1ve Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go i,..9ond that time, they s.ha11 be heard only with the consent of the Comm7dssion. l°��M rt. i+r ,,.,•n\:vr r ! r. r r... . . �Y.i..... . .J r�.. A �y �..L, Goo c�%CA.%40 CITY OF I RANChO CUCAMONGA o " _ o PLANNING C((IVII�I(ISSI(�iW F z AGENDA 1977 WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1980 LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNI& I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl k Commissioner Rempel X Commissioner King X Commissioner Tolstoy X Commissioner Sceranka X III. Public Hearing The following items are public hearings In which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. A. VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY - 80-01 Circulation B. COMMISSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS C. PRESENTATION BY THE DEVELOPER D. VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY - 80-01 Parks and Open Spaces E. COMMISSION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS F. PRESENTATION BY THE DEVELOPER IV. Public Comment V. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. v< The Planning Commission will adjourn to November 1 , 1980 9 a.m, for a presentation of the General Plan at the ti'• Lion's Park Community Building. CI1'Y UF ItAN(.:f !0 Ca.'C�.r ,:�1< ►,'�'GA �;_cn�yr�,t. O O DATE: October 9, 1980 F z J > TO: Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner SUBJECT: VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY ABSTRACT: As the Commission will recall dt tiie meetinc of September 16, 1980 we discussed tine areas of :•eview for the Vit-Loria Plan. Land Use has been discussed and Circulation,and Parks and Open Space are tie next two items sub- ject to discussion. Included previously in your packet cf information is a report. from the City Engineer and a report from the Oiret.tor of Community Services. Contained hevein are recommended conditions f ,r Circulation and Parks and Open Space. We would request that the Planning Commission consider tie next categories for review. There are five categories left . 1 . Infastructure 2. Design Criteria 3. Regulations (zoning or development regulations) 4. Implementation 5. D.E.I.R. (Draft Environmental Impact Report) It would be our suggestion that Infastructure and Desigr Criteria be the next two items of discussion. We have reserved the Forum at tie Lion's Building for October 29, 1980 from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. We would like conformation of the next two items to be reviewed and of the proposes; neeting date at your October 11, 1980 review for Victoria discussion. We have reviewed the report. by the City Engineer and recommend the following seven conditions for circulation. 1 . Rochester Avenue shall be extended northerly to connet:t with Victoria Park- way. 2. Hiohlan6 Avenue shall be constructed at a 64 fool, curl to curb section to accomodate 5 lanes of traffic, specific alignment, and design shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. At the time of development at the intersections of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue, and at the intersection of Highland le e a ^a? r ces Boulevard plans shall to prepared ty the applicant cc.:)-.iraticy °r.-nt- age road situation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Caltrans . 4. Should any of the streets that cross the Pacific Elect•ic rail tracts (ie. Milliken, Rochester, Day Creek) require grade separation, the applicant shall be required to prepare preliminary design studie! to determine con- figuration and right-of-way requirements. hi':turia manned Community octo; er 9, 1980 Page 2 5. Tne applicant shall prepare a detailed traffic analysis detailing the circulation ele`ents such as street location, freeway interchange, or the regional shopping center and the regional related areas. Such y.cis shall be prepared to the sati the City Engineer, sfrstion of 6. Precise alignment studies and rights-of-way limits will be required to be prepared by the applicant, including but not limited to, Victoria Parkway, local coilectors , etc. , prior to the co any unprecised street. nsideration of approval of any tentative tract maps involving significant alignment features of 7. Street standards shall conform to those of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If t'ie Planning Commission concurs with the Staff Rep ort presented Engineer, then the above-mentioned conditionthe n s should be added etotheyappr City A Staff Report has bee prepared by Bill Holley, Community Services Director and was presented to the Planning Commission at your previous mceting. We have prepared recommended conditions of approval for parks . They are: 1 . The lakes are approved in concept only. Further detailedstud•ies shall be submitted to the City prior to any tentative tract approvals for a village that contains a lake. The detailed studies shall indicate the construction techniques of the lake, the details of design, the details of maintenance of the lake, and cost estimates for maintenance. 2. The applicant shall deposit an appropriate sum of money with the City to pay for a lake consultant to be hired by the City to review the submission material for the lake proposed ^n Victoria. 3. Park credit for land privately owned and maintained shall be evaluated on a case by case basis at the tirne of tentat •i ve Tract approval Credit of up to 10016 may be given. This condition appli park land thes to park land that would be provided for public use and at would not be pro- vided for public use. 4. Each park area within each village shall be given to the City in a complete form including, but not limited to, i+rstailed parking areas, seeded play areas, irriqation and restrooms prior tc, the construction of greater than 50' of the lots within the village. Park design shall be to the satisfaction the of Director of Community Services and consistent with the Victoria Planned Communities, 5. 4.47 acres of public park land must be adced to the land prior to consider- ation of approval of any tentative tract maps within the plan. lictoria Planned Cwtimunit, October 9, 1980 C Page 3 I Should you have any questions or need clarification on any of the suggested conditions of approval , please do not hesitate to contact this office. Respectfully submitted, Barry K/ Flegan t City Planner BKN cd 4 X1 ' r1 1 .I — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA oCA ynhc STAFF REPORT r DATE: September 29, 1980 TO: Planning Commission a 1977 FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development BY: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner SUBJECT: P.C. 80-01 - VICTORIA - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY: TOPIC LAND USE ABSTRACT: As the Planning Commission will recall at your last meeting of 9-16-80, we established the review period of two weeks between meetir.•s with the first meeting to begin September 25, 1980 covering 1) land use 21 ;ir- culation and 3) parks/open space. The second meeting was to be non-specific as to topic and was to be held in the Etiwanda area on a Saturday. We have reserved the Etiwanda Community Room on Etiwanda Avenue for Saturday, October 11 , 1980 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. From our report of September 16, 1980 you can see the topics to be discussed under the land use portion of the Victoria Review. They are: . Statistical summary . Land use analysis . Four villages comparisons This report will analyze the specific sections of the plan arld text as they relate to land use and provide suggested conditions of approval for the problem areas. It must be remembered that this is part of a larger whole and should not stand alone. DISCUSSION: The stipulations of the Planned Community Ordinance requires the applicant to: 1 . Design and develop all uses in the Planned Community in a manner comparable with and competitive to existing and potential development in the general vicinity. 2. All development shall relate harmoniously to the topography and make su4table provisions for preservation of water courses, drainage areas, wooded areas, rough terrain and similar natural features. 3. Submit a development plan identifying areas in the plan, indicating scheduling for Idevelopment. The applicant has provided the basic material necessary for land use in accordance with the Ordinance. STATISTICAL SUM14ARY: Taken from page 109-IIE is the statistical summary below: F•: ws Planning Commission M-eting September 29, 1980 P.C. 80-01 Page 2 These calculations are based on planimeter readings and are subject to corrections based on an accurate survey. LAND USE ACREAGE 1 . Commercial Acres Regional Center (including lakes within Regional Center area only) 100 Regional Related Commercial 210 Village Commercial Centers 50 2. Community Facilities Schools 30 Potential Civic Uses: Fire, Police, Transit Station 30 Churches 10 3. Parks, Lakes and Community Trails Village Park, (The Groves, The Vineyards , The Windrows, including lake in Windrows Park) 30 Lakes and Lake Edges (Village of Victoria Lakes only, not including lakes in Retional Center area) 40 k Victoria Linear Park (Not including paved area of Victoria Parkway) 35 tf Community Trails 5 ' Private Community Recreation Facility;, ty 10 Planning Commission ( Ming September 29, 1980 P.C. 80-01 Page 3 S' Acres 44 4. Unimproved Open Space +1` Southern California Edison Corridors 160 Day Creek Channel : Flood Control Basin 100 Southern Pacific Right-Of-Way 30 N• 5. Roads Day Creek. Blvd. , Milliken, Highland, Base Line, f: Foothill 120 Local Feeder Roads 60 �r G Victoria Parkway (pavement width) 10 Other roads: Miller, Victoria Loop, Etiwanda Ave. Victoria Street. 45 6. Existing Land Uses Heublein, Lumberyard, Nichiren Church, etc. 40 • 7. Resident?al Land Uses Land Use/Density Range Acres Optimum„ Yield "A" Windrow Residential 2-3 du/A 165 450 Units "B" Single Family 7-15 du/A 530 3,150 Units "C" Single Family 7-15 du/A 175 2,150 Units '• "D" Garden Apt./Condominium 3 15-25 du/A 105 2,100 Units "E" Town Apt./Condominium 25-35 4; du/A 50 1,600 Units "F" Town Center 35-40 du/A 10 400 Units Totals 1,035 9,850 Units Planning Commission ( ting Septmeber 29, 1980 P.C. 80-01 Page 4 LAND USE ANALYSIS: In order to evaluate each of the land uses proposed for Victoria this section will proceed in the same order as the Statistical Summary. 1 . Commercial : The location of the Regional Center has been established as Planning Commission and City Council preference at previous meetings regarding the proposed General Plan. The size of the Center is determined by the ultimate projected service demands of the Region. In this case the Regional Center developer, Ernest Hahn, proposes six major department stores with related facilities on 100+ acres. The Regional Center anchors Victoria Planned Community. The details of the specific design have not been worked out at this point in the Planning process and will require further consider- ation by the City at a later date. Suugested Condom: prior to consideration of specific designs for the Regional Center a focused E.I.R. shall be prepared on the isso—c of traffic, aesthetics and long and short term impacts of the proposed project. 2. Regional Related Commercial : It appears that there is an in ordinate amount of Regions Related (R/R) land use. However, in researching other Regional Centers of this type there are large amounts of R/R useage within close proximity. Because it is difficult to predict precisely the appro- priate amount of RJR to designate for this area. Page 150-156 of the Victoria DEIR indicates a range of acreage projected based on projected future demand i.e. 111-246 ac. ; the Plan provides 210 ac. Because this is such a unknown area we suggest that 210 acres is appropriate at this time, but should be reviewed periodically to insure that our projections are still accurate. Suggested Condition: The development process and regional demand for Ile Regions Related area shall be periodically reviewed to determine the continued viability of the amount of acreage proposed. This review shall not be more than three years apart and begin after the opening of the Regional Center. 3. Village Commercial Centers V.C.C. : There are four V.C.C. proposed. 1)—Soouthwest corner of Highland and Milliken; 2) Northeast corner of Base Line and Milliken; 3) Southwest corner of Day Creek and Highland; and 4) Northwest corner of Base Line and Victoria Parkway. As stated in the Interim General Plan for Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Centers or V.C.C. draw from a population service area of 10,000+ people. In locating V.C.C. the City should look at how best these centers will serivice Victoria and the adacent areas. The Center at the southwest corner of Highland and Milliken is located well to service Victoria and areas north of Highland. The Center located at the Southwest corner of Day Creek and Highland is located well to ' service Victoria and north and east Etiwanda areas. The Center at the north- west corper of Base Line and Victoria Parkway is a smaller Center a ;d will service those areas missed by the Previous two and also the Etiwanda area Immediately east of the planned community. The Center at the northeast 4, corner of Base Line and Milliken should be elimnated for the following reasons: Ei, Planning Commission ' -TING September- 29, 1980 P.C. 80-01 Page 5 As the Commission is aware, there is a Planned Community proposed by Lewis Homes south of the Victoria Planned Community. Within Terra Vista there are approximately 2.50 Neighborhood Shopping Centers proposed. In order to provida adequate service radius for the shopping centers proposed in the Terra Vista area the Milliken and Base Line site on Victoria should be reverted to a residential land use. Whether or not Terra Vista developes the proposed General Plan will indicate various residential land uses necessitating service by Neighborhood Commercial Centers. At this point in time it is known that approximately 8,000 people could reside within the boundaries of the Terra Vista Planned Community with the present traffic system. Additionally, because of the adjacency of Victoria, and the adjacency of already developed land to Terra Vista Planned Community, approximately two centers would be located on the proposed General Plan for the Terra Vista Planned Community. 4 drt P� The Village Commercial Shopping Center proposed at orner of Milliken and Base Line Road shall be eliminated and replaced with D. Land Use. COMMUNITY FACILITIES Schools: Each of the three predominant residential villages; Victoria Groves, Victoria Vineyards, and Victoria Windrows, are anchored by Elementary School Facilities and a park. Each of the schools and parks are located along Victoria Parkway, which is a linear corrector having both equestrian and biking/hiking trails. The locations of the schools and the size of the facilities are subject to the approval of the school districts. In the case of the school in Victoria Groves it would be subject to the approval of the Alta Loma School District. In the case of all remaining schools they would be subject to the approval of the Etiwanda School District. The quantity of schools required is also determined by the School District. The Victoria Planners have verified the number of schools desired by the School Districts based upon the projected population to be generated from the development as proposed. Should there be any drastic change in the number of dwelling units proposed for this develop- ment, the number of schools proposed would have to be reevaluated by the School District. Suagesled Condition: Prior to the approval of any tract within any of the villages containing proposed school facilities the School District involved must consent in writing to the need and location for school facility. Additionally, the sites reserved for schools shall be sufficient in size for the needs of the school District. Potential Civic Uses : Within the Victoria area there is an existing Fire Station located northerly of Base Line Road, near Day Creek. The Foothill Fire Protection District provides the service to the project area. Area "S" on the Victoria Community Plan is indicated as potential Civic Center uses. This could be a Transit Station, a Police sub-station, or used for expansion of fire facilities. There are two chruch sites proposed within Victoria. One is in the Victoria Vineyards along Victoria Parkway. Planning Commission ' ting (• September 29, 1980 P.C. 80-Oi Page 6 The second site is adjacent to Heublein on Base Line Road near Day Creek. PARKS, LAKES, AND COMMUNITY TRAILS There are three parks proposed. Dne in each of the residential villages: Victoria Groves has the Groves Park, Victoria Vineyards has the Vineyards Park, and Victoria Windrows has the Windrows Park. Included in the Windrows Park is a proposed Lake. These parks are approximately 10 acres in size each. Additionally, the plan proposes Victoria Lakes within the village_ of Victoria Lakes. These two lake - encompassed 40 acres of surface area and Lake edge. Also, a major feature of the plan, is Victoria Linear Park.encompassing 35 acres. Victoria Linear Park serves as a greenbelt connector of all of the villages within Victoria Planned Community. Additionally, all of the park and school facilities are located along its length. Within the Planned Community there are approximately 5 acres of trails proposed. The trails lead to and from the various residential areas to the schools and parks. What is depicted on the community plan are the major community trails. There may be smaller trails that would feed into these major trails. There is a private community recreation facility proposed at the terminus of Victoria parkway at the northern end of the Lakes. Membership would be available to people within Victoria and to other people additionally. It is not a mandatory requirement of the residence of Victoria that they join the Recreation Center. UNIMPROVED OPEN SPACE There are two Southern California Edison corridors running north and south through the eastern end of Victoria. They encompass approximately 160 acres and are proposed for a variety of uses. Additionally, Day Creek Channel runs parallel to and west of the Edison rights-of-way. It encompasses approximately 100 acres of right-of-way. The last area of unimproved open space is the east-west Pacific Electric right-of-way running approximately 1 ,000 feet north of Base Line Road. Along this right-of-way is proposed a local trail on the proposed General Plan for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ROADS There are a number of roads proposed for Victoria Planned Community totalling 235 acres. EXISTING LX4D USES iy1 There are approximately 40 acres of existing land uses that will most likely remain in their present condition. They are the existing lumber yard at the terminus of Rochester north cf Base Line, the Heublein wine facility near .i. Victoria Parkway and Base Line R;,ad and the Nichiren Shoshu Temple on Etiwanda Avenue. Planning Commission ting : Septemoer 29, 1980 P.C. 80-0i Page 7 RESIDENTIAL LAND USES The densities of residential land uses proposed within Victoria range from a low of two units an acre to a high of 45 units per acre. There are six different types of residential land useages ranging from "A" to "F" and increasing in density. Of the 2,150 acres within Victoria there are 1 ,035 acres in residential land uses. The "A" catagory: "Windrow Residential" encompasses 155 acres and lies primarily along the Etiwanda Avenue frontage. This land use was proposed as a buffer and a transition to the low density Windrow Residential land uses shown on the Interim General Plan. The "B" Land Uses encompass a range of three to seven dwelling units per acre and total 530 acres of land within Victoria.. The "B" Land Use varies in lot size from 7,200 sq. ft. to 3,000 sq. ft. and in residential dwelling types from single family residential to patio homes to O-Lotline homes. The "C" Lard Use ranges from seven to fifteen dwelling units per acre encompassing 175 acres totally and is primarily townhouse and fourplex developments. The "D" Land Use ranges in density from fifteen to twenty-five dwelling units per acre encompassing 105 acres and is characterized by garden apartment or condominium development. The "E" Land Use ranges from twenty-five to thirty-five dwelling units per acre and encompasses approximately 50 acres of land. They are primarily low rise apartments or condominiums. The "F" Land Use ranges in density from thrity-five to forty-five dwelling units per acre encompassing approximately 10 acres of land and is characterized by high-rise apartments or condominiums. The applicant has tried to arrange the various land uses within Victoria to get a balance of dwelling types within each village. The "E" and "F" Land Uses are located near the intersection of Victoria Parkway and Base Line Road or around the north Victoria Lake. In all cases the various land uses whether they be identical or different land uses are seperated from one another by either a road or a trail . As the Commission will retail , there has been much concern expressed over the provision of affordable housing within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed Housing Element of the General Plan suggests that 15% of the dwellings within the City of Rancho Cucamonga be within the affordable range. On page 225 of the Victoria Text the applicant suggests that within the Victoria Community Planned area 10% of the dwellings will be delivered to low and moderate income families. Addttionally, these dwellings would be disbursed throughout Victoria so that each village has approximately 10% of the homes in the affordable range. Afford- able housing would include a mix of attached/ detached and mobile family dwellings. We suggest that the Victoria Planned Community increase the amount of affordable housing to 150M within each village. Planning Commission ( iting September 29, 1980 P.C. 80-0I Page 8 Suggested Condition: The Victoria Planned Community shall contain 15% of its dwelling units as affordable housing as defined on page 225 of the Victoria Planned Community text. One of the requirements of the Planned Community Ordinance is to establish a maximum amount of dwelling units allowable within a planned community area. This is established by taking the boundaries of the property and deline,`4-ig those on the General Plan. The land uses are then plano,)ieter and ca _ions made to produce the final dwelling unit count. Since a portion of thi ,dn lies within the alternative areas of the Interim General Plan, this calculation will be forthcoming to the Planning Commission after November 1 , at which time we anticipate the proposed General Plan to be available for public review. Staff has initially done some calculations based upon the traffic capacity of the streets within Victoria Planned Community and can assure the Commission that the optimum proposed by the applicant of 9,850 dwelling units will fit within the range of allowable dwelling units for this particular area. FOUR VILLAGF,S COMPARISONS: There are four 01 1ages within the community of Victoria. Victoria Groves, Victoria Vineyards , Victoria Windrows and Victoria Lakes. Each village is designed with a focus and a connection to each other village. For example: the focus of Victoria Groves is the Elenenatary School and park. It is connected to Victoria Vineyard via Victoria Parkway. The focus of Victoria Vineyards is the Elementary School facilities park and church. Victoria Vineyards is then connected to Victoria Windrows via Victoria Parkway. The focus of Victoria Windrows is again the Elementary School and park. It is connected to Victoria Lakes via 'Victoria Parkway. The focus of Victoria Lakes is the lakes and the Regional Shopping Center. Of the four villages three are primarily residential , ie. Victoria Groves, Victoria Vineyards, and Victoria Windrows. The village of Victoria Lakes is primarily the Regional Shopping Center and Regional Related uses such as cemmercial and office. There are some residential land uses located adjacent to the north Victoria ' akes. The relationship of the land uses within the Victoria Planned Comp .city are lied together well by use of the Victoria Parkway. Because of the unusual L shape, it is necessary that each of the geographic areas defined by the major streets such as Milliken, Base Line, Highland, and the Flood Control Channel have a central focus. The problem of relating each of the villages to the community is done through the use of the Victoria Linear Parkway. And the introduction of the regional center to the community is also accomplished through the use of the Victoria Lakes. CONCLUSION P This report,while detailed,only generally covers the issue of land use. The text presented by the applicant fully delineates each of the land uses proposed within Victoria Planned Community in addition to each of the feateres and amenities proposed. �i Planning Commission I ting September 24, 1980 P.C. 80-01 Page 9 Should you have any particular questions ivgarding any of the details contained within the text, please do not hesitate to contact this office_ It would be the staff's intent after the conclusion of the review of land use as described in this report to prepare detailed conditions of approval on land use. This would be our procedure for each of the various review areas. At the completion of the review of all of the areas of consideration staff will present a final wrap-up report summarizing the actions which have occured and compiling the conditions of approval for the Victoria Planned Community. Should the Commission complete the review of land use on Monday, September 29, 1980 we will then proceed on to the discussion of circulation. A report sent under seperate cover is available for your review. Staff will be prepared to discuss the various issued of cir- culation as they relate to the Planned Community and the City as a whole. Should the Commission complete the review of circulation on Monday, September 29, a report prepared under seperate cover will be available for your review on the Parks and Open Space of this plan. Respectfully submitted Jack Lam, Director of Community Development JL:BKH:cd 4, r. ji .�fl' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G�CnMpN MEMORANDUM o - o F Z U > DATE: September 26, 1980 1977 TO: Jack Lam, Director, Community Development FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Victoria Community Plan Circulation The Engineering Division has completed its primary level of analysis on the Circulation Plan for the proposed Victoria Community. As a result of this anaiysis and the findings of the Circulation Element of the General Plan, the proposed circulation, with some modification will be adequate to handle the intensity of development proposed. In order to place our circulation analysis in prospective, it is necessary to place the Victoria Plan within the context of the overall General Plan process and in particular, the General P'an Circulation Element. IPLANIJING PROCESS As you are aware, the overall Gereral Plan Circulation Element and the specific roadway linkage system was only resolved for presentation to the Citizens Advisory Commission within the past few weeks. This plan was necessary to provide the general background traffic network and traffic volumes upon which to relate the Victoria Plan. Because land use ;parameters for the proposed plan are at levels compatible with the Victoria proposal , the General Plan study basically served to verify the Circulation needs of Victoria. I would like to point out that the Traffic Analysis contained in the E.I.R. evaluation of the Victoria proposal was prepared sometime ago and was based properly on background traffic assumptions related to the interim General Plan in effect at that time. In order to update the parameters of this analysis, we were required to await the development of the General Plan Circulation Studies and in particular, the traffic projections from the City's Traffic Model . These results have been obtained and as stated previously, show that the basic transportation framework proposed by Vitoria is adequate to service the development. DETAILED CIRCULATION AMLYSIS Detailed analysis of the traffic needs , although not totally complete at this time, indicate that there are several levels of concern that will require further study. Some of these concerns should be resolved at the specific plan level where as others will require detailed traffic operations studies related to specific development proposals. Jack Lam < Victoria Community Plan Circulation September 26, 1980 Page 2 These areas of concern are summarized as follows: Detailed Collector Street Provisions Detailed analysis of the projected collector street system requires further study to insure that traffic volumes along Victoria Parkway are distributed in such a manner as to maintain the rural character of that roadway system. These further studies will likely result in the provision of additional collector streets to augment the proposed loops now branching from the Victoria Parkway. As a pert of these modification:;, Rochester Avenue should connect through the Plan to Base Line Road. This connection is consistent with the General Plan proposal and will serve to relieve traffic congestion on Milliken Avenue and the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard with Foothill Boulevard. Under the proposed Circulation Element serious traffic concerns focus on the availability of freeway access. As a mitigation for, these problems, an interchange has been proposed at Seventh Street and Interstate 15 (Devore Freeway). The continuation of Rochester would serve to distribute traffic to this interchange and away from potentially congested interchanges at Foothill and the Devore Freeway and Milliken and Interstate 10 (San Bernardino Freeway). The Engineering Division will be meeting with the Victoria Engineers and Planners to further work out these collector systems and should be able to resolve connections prior to adoption of the plan. Foothill Freeway Interface The northerly boundary of the Victoria Community is contiguous to Highland Avenue and the proposed Foothill Freeway. Upon completion of the freeway or other high speed arterial system, Highland Avenue would become a frontage road. This frontage road has not been specifically detailed at this time, but could utilize large portions of tiic existing Highland Avenue with specific modifications at the interchanges with Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. Until the development of the Foothill Freeway Corridor, Highland Averoue should be constructed to a 64 foot curb to curb section to accommodate 5 lanes of traffic similar to existing Nineteenth Street. .111 development proposals at the intersection of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue and at Highland and Day Creek should be required to prepare the details of the frontage road system in coordination with Caltrans. The details of this analysis would not be appropriate at the current level of planning. Grade Separation Milliken Avenue, Rochester Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard all cross the Pacifc Jack Lam Victoria Community P% :irculation September 26, 1980 Page 3 Electric tracks towards the center of the plan. Preliminary discussions with the Public Utilities Commission indicat that these could be at grade crossings, however, further study should be conduc�ed on this matter. If any of these crossings should require grade separation, preliminary design studies should be carried out to determine right-of-way requirements. Provision of such improvements would in the Engineering Division's interpre- tation, be a proper purpose for systems development funds. Regional Center Access General Plan Circulation studies indicate that the intensity of development including the Regional Center and regional related development will generate significant volumes of traffic which will require detailed traffic analysis and substantial capital improvements involving the Foothill Boulevard inter- change to the Devore Freeway and the connection of Day Creek Boulevard to Foothill Boulevard. The detailed traffic analysis to resolve these precise circulation elements require precise development plans for the Regional Center and specific proposals for regional related development. Although these studies have begun with a consulting team, they cannot be resolved at the level the specific plan approval . The consultant team now working on these sensitive traffic studies is composed of the City Engineer, DKS Associates, City Traffic Consultants, Wes Pringle and Associates, Victoria Traffic Consultant, Donald Frischer and Associates, Hahn Company Traffic Consultant, Caltrans, SWA Victoria Planning Consultants, Southwest Engineering, Hahn Company Site Engineers. The results of these studies will be a conceptual circulation plan at the freeway interchange for submittal to Caltrans for their approval . The results of these studies will resolve precise plans for Day Creek Boulevard, Foothill Boulevard, Miller Avenue and the freeway interchange. Studies may also effect the operational characteristics of Etiwanda Avenue between Base Line and Foothill. PRECISE ALIGNMENT STUDIES he proposed plan establishes the general alignment of streets within the pro- ject and significant detail about design characteristics. In order to insure the intent of these characteristics, precise alignment studies and right-of- way limits will be required for logical design segments for specific streets. A precise plan should be adopted for Victoria Parkway as soon as possible after the adoption of the plan and prior to approval of Tentative Maps which may involve significant alignment features. The precise plan will indicate exact survey locations. collector systems will require precise alignment plans in logical segment prior to or concurrent with approval of Tentative Maps. STREET STA14DARDS Public and private street standards should be adopted for the pla.nswhich are in conformance with standards adopted by the General Plan. The draft standards i Jack Lam Victoria Community Plan Circulation September 26, 1980 Page 4 are included in the Circulation Element and differ somewhat from those proposed by Victoria. Upon adoption, the two should be consistent-. CONCLUSION The Circulation Plan as proposed is adequate to maintiin the propnsed level of development. Further detailed analysis will be requi •ed to implement the plan as described aboe,e. Respectfully submitted, r � U � LBH:j as r. . 4 , 1 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CvcAMp�v rl MEMORANDUM , September 26, 1980 0 - o a E- a z ;1 a 1977 To: Barry Pogan, City Planner From: Bill Holley, Director, Community Services Department Subject: Victoria Community Plan This memorandum addresses the above referenced project with respect to provision of parks, open space and recreation facilities. Comments are based upon a study of the document The Victoria Community Plan, by the Wi Ttiam Lyon Company as submitted to the City in June of 1980; discussions with Gary Frve of the William Lyon Company; and, discussions with City Planning staff. The Requirements Proceeding under the assumption that the population projections cited in the Plan on page 115 are valid, the project will generate a population of 22,895. The standards for park and recreation facilities in subdivision, as set forth in Ordinance 105*, applied to this project's projected population indicate that provision of 114.47 acres of park and recreational land will be required. 22,895 x 5 = 114.47 1000 The Plan proposes, on page 110, to meet this requirement through the provision of 110 acres of public park lands divided between parks, 30 acres; lakes, 40 acres; linear parks, 35 acres; and community trails, 5 acres. The Plan also lists a private member- ship recreation facility of lU acres. The Plan, as proposed, satisfies 96% of the public park lands requirement. The private membership recreation center is not given credit toward the requirement as it falls outside the prescribed standards in Ordinance 105, Section 3(F) (2) (3),** being voluntary, and operated by way of initiation fees and monthly dues. *** The Parks The parks, Groves, Vineyards, and Windrows, would appear very appropriate ... . when ^lanned and used in conjunction with school sites as proposed in the Plan. This is pointedly demonstrated by Windrows Park. Should the school not materialize, this park, centered within a low medium residential setting could not support a reasonable variety of recreational opportunities for the 5,960 residents of Windrow Village, having only the lake and it's edges available. l l . memo 9/26/80 to: B. Hogan from: B. Holley subj: Victoria Community Plan pg 2 The Victoria Parkway The Victoria Parkway as a concept, and c.s presented in the plan also appears appropriate. The treatment of the linear park, with it's meandering bicycle/ pedestrian trails would provide a pleasant recreational opportunity to the residents of the Plan, as well as a nice visual relief. Care must, however, be exercised in circulation planning to insure that the Parkway would not attract a burdensome vehicular traffic load. The Community Trails The Community Trail System concept as described in the Plan is satisfactory and should benefit the Project. The Lakes The concept of the lakes is very interesting. It would be appropriate, however, to have this portion of the plan studied by a firm independent of the William Lyon Co. , with expertise in the areas of lake construction and maintenance. That expertise is not available within City staff resources. An important factor in this portion of the Plan is recognizing that the main recreational function of the lakes is visual not active. It must also be recognized that 36% of the project's park and recreation requirement is proposed to be met through the lake system. From my perspective, this type of balance between active and passive is not only acceptable, but desirable. Meeting the City Park Requirements (page 227 V.C.P. ) The first three paragraphs are acceptable as presented. The fourth paragraph needs a rewrite to the effect of indicating that a dollar for dollar development credit would be given toward the park requirement, but no credit would be given the Lyon Co. for the lands owned by Southern California Edison or San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Recommendations: Recommendations would be as follows: 1 . That the Lakes portion of the project be studied apart from the William Lyon Co. with regard to construction, maintenance. Along this same line, the questions should be spec?rically addressed regarding availability of lake fill water and the re:iability of that availability. 2. The Schools and the Park should be designed as a unit with agreements between the City and the Districts covering maintenance and use. 3. The maintenance of all public open space is to be maintained by a special assessment district, as called for in the Plan. ;t V;. memo 9/26/80 to: B. Hogan from: B. Holley subj: Victoria Community Plan pg 3 4. The 4.47 acre deficit ire meeting the park requirement must be added into the plan. If I can provide further information, let me know. BH/mw * Ordinance 105, Section 2(E) Standards for Dedication. The amount of land to be dedicated or the fees to be paid shall bear a reasonable relationship to the use of benefits of :he park and recreation facilities by the future residents of the subdivision. The City Council hereby establishes a ratio of five (5) park acres to one thousand (1 ,000) population, in accordance with the adopted Park and Recreation Element of the City's General Plan. ** Ordinance 105, Section 3 (F) Park and Recreational Land Credit for Planned Communities. Where private open space for park and recreational purposes is provided in a planned community and portions of or all such space is to be privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the planned community, credit against the requirement of dedication for park and recreational purposes, as set forth in Section 2(G) shall be determined through the adoption of the planned community tent provided, however, that the park standard for said planned community is the same as for any other development and that the Planning Commission finds it is in the public interest to do so, and that the following standards are met: (1 ) (2) That the private ownership and maintenance of the open space is adequately provided for by written agreement; and (3) That the use of the private open space is restricted for park and recreational purposes by recorded covenants which run with the land in favor of the future owners of the property within the tract; and (4) . . . . . . . . (5) . . . . . . . . *** A COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER (page 78, V.C.P. ) - At the north end of North Victoria Lake, on both sides of Victoria Parkway, a community recreation facility will be located.. . . . . . Membership in this club will be open to all Victoria residents, and will be voluntary, with initiation fees and monthly dues. r " oG�C �IG, Ali 'AM CITY OF R.A•NCI-IO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION Z AGENDA p> 1977 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 1980 7:00 p.m. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE; RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA . REVIEW OF VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY 80-01 I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempel Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Sceranka III. Introductory comments and Staff Report 7:00 - 7:15 on Victoria Planned Community IV. Introductory comments by Gary Frye of 7:15 - 7:45 William Lyon Company, proponent of Victoria Planned Community V. Presentation by SWA Group, Planners 7 :45 - 9:00 for Victoria Planned Community VI . Break 9:00 - 9:20 VII. Questions of SWA Group, Gary Frye 9.20 - 10.00 a and Staff VIII. Selection of review items and next 10:00 - 10:30 two meeting dates and times for continued review of Victoria IX. Adjourn to September 24. 1980 regular 10:30 Planning Commission Meeting i' — CITY OF RANUiO C;UC ,iONGA c<'CA. STAFF REPORT Goo c' n `I- tL era O O F $ Z U Y To: Planning Commission 1977 From: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development By: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner Subject: PLANNED COMMUNITY NO. 80-01 AND ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR VICTORIA - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY - This is a request for the establishment of a Planned Community Zone, text and development plan setting forth specific land uses, development standards, a circulation system and overall design theme. The project encompasses 2,150+ acres bounded on the north by Highland Avenue. following Deer Creek on the west until it intersects the Southe n Pacific Railroad, which 'then jogs east and then south to Base Line. From Base Line the boundary travels east past Rochester and then south u..til it inter- sects I-15 which then transverses along 1-15 to Etiwanda Avenue which forms the eastern edge of the project site. ABSTRACT: This is the first of a series of meetings that will be held m Victoria Planned Community. The purpose of this first meeting is to set the foundation for the review process and to begin discussion of the Victoria Planned Community. DISCUSSION: The Victoria Planned Community (PC) encompasses 2,150 acres of land and includes i'lood control and edison easements bifuricating the property. Also included in Victoria is a regional shopping center proposed by the Ernest Hahn Company. The major problem facing the developer was how to relate all of the pieces into one cohesive plan. He proposes to do so by the use of a linear park (Victoria Parkway) and a series of lakes. The developer will be present on Tuesday evening to make a presentation on the development of Victoria and his proposals for development. This report will cover six areas of discussion - objective or purpose, approval process, planned community relationship with existing ordinances, planned community ordinance, statistical summary, program for review. Plan Objective: As stated on Page 23 of the text, "The principle planning objective of this plan is to create a total , integrated community that: responds to the goals of the General Plan and the environment" . (paraphrased) In addition to those goals and objectives stated in the text the plan roust also meet the purposes as outlined in Ordinance 94 (Planned Communities) ; i .e. promote and protect the public health, safety and welfare, promote more econo- Planned Community No. E 3 " Page 2 mical and efficient use of the land while providing a harmonious variety of housing choices, commercial activities, a high level of urban amenities, and preservation of natural and scenic qualities of open space (see attached ordinance for entire purpose) . f; Approval Process: In order to give the Commission some idea of the approval process the following flow chart has been prepared: Developer Developer Refinement Plan consultation w preparation of of Concept Preparation Staff & fity concept plan Staff Begin P.C. Plan Submittal review for review process completeness public hearings Completion of Begin C.C. Completion of public hearings review process public hearings and plan approval public hearings and plan rec. to C.C. approval The end product that the developer receives from the City is a designation of "PC" on his property, adopted development plan; i .e. a more specific General Plan, adopted development regulations for his property. After completion of the approval process, the developer may submit for develop- ment of the prorarty within the Planned Connnunity. In the case of Victoria; however, no development submittal may occur on the regional shopping center until further filings are made in the way of a specific EIR for the regional center and its ancillary features. Planned Community Relationshi with Existing Ordinances: It must be remembered that the Planned Community, although it has somewhat different development (zoning) regulations, it would be neither productive or desirable to create an entirely new zoning text for each planned community. Therefore, the PC text states what is different and should not repeat, but, instead reference the City's Zoning Ordinance where applicable. It should also be remembered that the regulations for the PC must be administered by the City Staff ind the intent and purpose of each and every regulation should be clear. Specific sections of our Zoning Ordinance should be referenced; i .e. Variances, Conditional Use Permits, Minor Deviations, Development Review, Home Occupations, Model Home Regulations and Temporary Uses. What we don't want is a community that looks good but does not work after it is built. Planned Community No. 8 '1 Page 4 4. Infrastructure . Storm drain/flood control . Sewerage . Water Electric Gas 5. Design Criteria • Victoria Parkway . Landscape standards • Development standards 5. Regulations (zoning or development regulations) 7. Implementation In order to provide the most efficient and effective review of each of the seven parts of the whole, we suggest that the Planning Commission select the first and second most important parts that they wish to discuss. Staff will then schedule a special adjourned meeting for each part. As the Commis- sion completes review of one part, another two parts should be selected and prioritized, and so on until all of the parts have been reviewed. It would be our suggestion that there should be at least two weeks between each meeting. As the Commission will recall when the Interim General Plan was reviewed, we held back to back meetings, one week after another. The result was twofold - one we adopted an Interim General Plan; two, we were consumed with the work on the General Plan so much so that it was difficult to give adequate review to other Agenda items. Please remember that in the next two months, in addition to Victoria, the Planning Commission will be reviewing the proposed General Plan and all of the Growth Management files. The first two suggested meeting places would be the Forum on September 29 and October 13 at 7:00 p.m. Please reserve all Mondays through October and November for continued review of Victoria. Res ectfull submitted, (� J JACK LAM Director of Community Development JL:BKR:nm k,, Planned Community No. 6 ,1 Page 3 Statistical Summary: Listed below is an excerpt from the text of the acreages and generalized land uses within Victoria. Acreage Residential 1 ,035 Commercial (•includes regional ctr.) 360 Community Facilities 70 Park, Lakes, Trails 120 Unimproved Open Space 290 Existing Uses 40 Roads 235 TOTAL 2,150 Specific breakdown of each of the abovementioned categories is listed on Pages 109-115 of the text. Program for Review: We have divided the review of Victoria Planned Community into seven parts: 1 ) land use, 2) circulation, 3) parks/open space, 4) infra- structure, 5) design criteria, 6) regulations, 7) implementation. A further breakdown of each part is provided below: 1 . Land Use • Statistical summary . Analysis of land use locations • Housing analysis . SCE easement • Equestrian usage • Four villages comparisons . Amount of commercial • Flood control lands • Existing land use • Churches . Schools 2. Circulation . Streets (i .e. location/standard for development) . Trails (as a means of circulation) . Transit 3. Parks/Open Space . Victoria Lakes . City parks . Victoria linear park, Victoria Parkway . Trails - Bike/equestrian dui. 0RDItiANCF flo. jl, . AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T14C CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI1011GA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMUND- NCNT NO. 79-05 E5TADt.I Sill NG STANDARDS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES FOR PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEITS. i The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonqa doe's ordain as follows : SECTION 1 : Purposes: A. The Planned Community Zone is included in the• Zoning regulations to achieve the following purposes. 1 . To promote and protect the public health, safety, and welfare. 2. To implement the objectives and policies of the General Plan. 3. To safeguard and enhance environmental amenities and the quality of development . 4. To attain the physical , social , and economic advan- tages resulting from comprehensive and orderly planned use of land resources. 5. To lessen congestion and assure convenience of access; to secure safety from fire, flood, and other dangers; to provide for adequate light , air , sun- light, and open space; to promote and encourage conservation of scarce resources; to prevent over- crowding of land and undue concentration of popula- tion; to facilitate the creation of a convenient , attractive, and harmonious community; to attain a desirable balance of residential and employment opportunities; and to expedite the provision of adequate and essential public selrices. 6. To facilitate development within the City- in accor- dance With the General Plan by permitting greater flexibility and encouraginq more Creative and imaginative designs for major urban development projects subject to large-scale community planning. ?. 7. To promote more economical and efficient use of tha land while providing a harmonious variety ch"ices and commercial and industrial Ictivitiies, a t high level ref urban amenities, and rc ;c p rvation of natural and :conic qualities of ()pen space. a , . y . 8 To provide a process for initiation, review•, anel r r!Iulal ir+n of largo :scale .xnnhrchcn< ively planned urban eonomrniLic.,- that affords the•. maxi nit flexi- bility to the developer within the conLext cif an over-all devp.iopment program and specific, phased development plans corn dinat�d r:ith the provision of necessary public services and facilities. S�LTiC17 ?. : r, r•eral Rcquiremrnts A. A planned Community lone. shall include a minimum area of 6 3011 contiguous acres , under Single oa:nershil+ or Otherwise to unified planning, ee':nslruetion, and develop- ment. by a person , cor;?oraLion. or other entity- property caned fly public utilities , local districts or local governments will not he counted toward the 300 acre minimum, but may be used as a connector of single owner- ship, B. A planned Communily Zone shaLi be pstahlished upon appli- cation of a property owner , in accordance with the procedure set forth in Section 61 .0221 of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Wa ncho Cucamonga, and subject to the following provisions: 1 . Submission of a Development Plan for consideration by the Planning Commission and approval of the City Council , pursuant to this ordinance. 2. Determination by the Council that the establishment I Of the zone and approval of the Development Plan shall : a• Provide for the development of a comprehensively- planned urban community r•,ithin the zone that is 1 superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations. b. Provide for development within the zone in a minnen' consistent "'J"11 tiv General Plan and wiCh related development and growth management Policies of the City, C. Provide for the construction, improvement, or extension of transportation facilities , public utilities , and public services required by development with the zone- SECTION 3 : Use Regulations A. /llloa,a!?Ir' uses in pact) Planned Canmunit)' Zone shall he as establi .hed by a Dcvelopmrnt Plan Text aplrroved by the City Council . The Development Plan Text may incorporate uses by reference to specific base zone provisions, Wray establish sprcific use ing thereto. lists with definitions pertain- or B. Existing uses within the Planned Community Zone at the time of its establishment shall be deemed allowal1e and incorporated in the Ocvelopnrcni Plan, unless term;ned discontinued , or changed pursuant to .a specific t.i ,ie schedule incorporated in the Development Plan Text. C. Unless other,•rise provided by the Development Plan Text , public utility facilities and publicly-owned facilities shall be alloy,abie subject to a Conditional Use Permit. D. Unless other-.-rise provided by tyre be:•elopment Plan Text , arce55e1-y usi.s or facilities 511011 be 5ubje'Ct t0 the sa-euse ra ulaticn Froisions as the principal use or facility. E. Unless specified as subject to a Conditional Use Permit , each allowable use in the Planned Community Zone shall be ' subject to Director Revieo-w. F. Home Occupations pursuant to Ordinr.nce No. 72 shall be allowable in each Planned Community. SECTIOtt 4: Site Development Regulations and Performartet: Standards A. Planned Conwunit, Zone and all uses th-roin shall be dra7n11e1 and developed in a nrarn-.er compatible t•rith and Cnmplemcntar'y to existing and potential development in the gen: rat vicinity of the Zone. Site planning on the perimeter shall provide for the mutual protection of the zone and surro„nding property from potential adverse +� influences. D. 'rrere shall be ern minimum area, width, or depth require- ment for indi•ii,:ual lots , cKccpt as established by a Dovelopnrent Plan, a Conditional U•;c Permit , Director Review or by Lo,-•�t'ion and Development Plan. C. There shall be no minimum yard requirement for individual lots except as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Permit , Location and Development Plan, or by Director Review. D. There shall be no minimum usable open spice requirement for individual lots, excerpt as established by a Development Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan or by Director Review. E. There shall be no maximum height. or covera(ie requirement for individual lots, except as established by a Development Plan, a Specific Plan, Conum.nity Plan, a Conditional Use Permit, Location and Development Plan or by Director Rcview. F. The maximum number of dwelling units within a Planned Community Zone .hall not exceed the number of units indicated by the General Plan for property within the J ?One designated for re•idential use by the General Plan, Provided that ill, distribut inn of units within the 70ne and the maximum r minimum residential density on any individual site r within designated portions of the zone hall he govcr,r. , by the D:•vc•lopment Plan ',ix',•',. -. __ r Location and G. All public streets within or abutting the development shall be dedicated and improved to City specifications for that particular classification of street. Private streets within the development shall be permanently reserved and maintained for their intended prupose by means acceptable to and enforceable by the City. Con- sideration of other forms of access , such as pedestrian r-+ays, courts, plazas, driveways , horse trails, bike +. trails , or open parking lots offered for dedication may he made at the time of the Develel"lent Plan and Text consideration ac a means of meeting requirements for open space or park dedication requirements. H. All development within a Planned Community Zone shall relate harmoniously to the topography of the site, shall make suitable Provision for the prese:-vation of water courses , drainage areas, wooded areas, rough terrain, and similar natural features , and shall otherwise uc so designed inasmuch as possible, to use and retcin natural features and an.eoilies to the best advantage. I . Mechanical and electrical equipment , including air con- ditioners, antennas, pungrs , healing or cooling or venti - !ating equipment , exterior lighting, or similar equipment shall be located and operated in a manner so as not to unreasonably disturb the peace, quiet, and comfort of �- neighboring residents. Excluding roof-nrourtLed solar collector panels and decorative exterior lightirlo , all such equipment and devices shall be screened from view :turn any abutting street , and shall not be located in a street yard, .I, All areas for storage of maintenance equipment , and all service areas including refuse storage and collection facilities, shall be enclosed by a fence, vial ! , or landscape screen. K. All uses o-tilhin a planned Community Zone shall provide off-street parting and loading facilities pursuant to (11 -0?19(b) of file San Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The applicant may apply for and receive administratfve relief from Section 61 .0219(b) at Lire time of Development Flan Tentative consideration by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council vjh!:n verified proof has been submitted through specific examples of existing projects an<:/or expert testimony that supports reduced parking standards or stalls. L. The proposed means for assuring continuing existence, y maintenance and operation of the various common elements and facilities. Ft. Additional site drveiopnrent regulation, and performance standards applic.rble to individual uses or to designated portions of a Planned Community Zone may he establi .aled by the Dcvelnpmcnl Plan, Conditional (Ise Permit, Location and 0•:velgpn,^nt Plan, or Director P-eview approval pursuant ti.. to the Developrn••rtt Plan, SECTION 5: Pre-Application Procedure A. Prior to submitting an application for a Planned Community Zane, the appticant or prospective developer should hold Preliminary Consultations with the Diar•Cth,r of Conununily De"Clopntent and uther City officials to obtain information and guidance before entering into hinding commitments incurring subsCantial expense in the preparation of P1..6115, surveys and other data. Such preliminary consul- t.at.ions should be relative to a conceptual development plans which includes , but is not limited to, the follow- ing I . Proposed land uses to be developed within the zone. 2. Development concepts to be employed . 3. Schematic maps, illustrative material , and narrative sufficient. Lo describe the general relationships between land uses, and the intended desgin character and scale of principal features. ' 4. A preliminary time schedule for development , includ- ing quantitative data , such as population, housing units , land use acreage, and other data sufficient to illustrate phasing of development and potential impact on public service requirement: v. 0. folloatinq initial preliminary consultations pursuant to this section, the Director may require submission of a competently prrpared housing market analysis, dcntons'lrat- ing the need for housing by price range and ou,^her of t::elling units. Such analysi,, m.py he requested is a part of the pre-application review procedure_, may be made a requirement for submission of an application for a Planned Community Zone or may be requested as part of the environ- mental assessment or EIR. i C. Fc.11orrina initial prcliminar'; cVn5ultotions pursuant to L thi : c..C[iOp, LhC Director r•tv.r require submission of a C "'6' •t ^nt ly I'rep:u'cd Commercial martet analysis for any prrptts er) shopping center of major commercial uses , showing the need for such uses in the 10catlOn requested and Cite inadequacy of rxi5t°ng zoned sites to ou•e ' l this need. fhr. ntnrl•.eIt ana'ysis shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1 . Dete. rntin:tioo of potential trade area. 2. Estimates of existing and future populatioK* of the trade area. 3. Determination of existing and polentia,,, effective buying pot:.•r in the trade area . 4. Determinntirn of tho net potential customer buying power for tie prcpuscd comnmercial development. application review procedure, l� ray betnwdetaVrequiremitnt or submission of an appli w tio,, for a hl..rnned Community assessment or [ IR. - zone , r be requested as part of the environvrent.al ss D. rollowing initial preliminary consultation pursuant to p., 0 this section, the Director may require presentation of the conceptual development plan to the Planning Commission. Such presentation shall be for information purposes only, and shall be. in addition to subsequent public review requirements pursuant to an application for a Planned Community Zone and submission of Development Plan. SECTION 6: Development Plan A. The Development Plan tc be submitted with an application for a Planned Commmunity Zone shall include the following: 1 . A boundary survey map of the property and a calcu- lation of the gross land area within the proposed zone. A tentative subdivision map may be substituted if the arrlicant proposes to subdivide the property. 2• A topographic map and general grading concept plan with specific sections for Sensitive areas, as determined by the Grading Committee for the property and adjacent land within 100 feet of the property , shown at contour intervals not to exceed 2 feet for natural slopes over 2?, or less. For natural slopes over 2`;; contour interval shall not exceed 5 feet. w/ 3. Maps and supporting tabulations showing the current General Plan land use designation, the Current ' zoning classification, and the current land use within the proposed zone and on adjacent sites within 300 feet. The location of structures and other sigrlificant improvements shall be shown, 4. A land use plan identifying area; within the pro- posed zone and uses to lie developed therein, sup- ported by proposed or projected acreage, population, housing units, employment , and such related panning and development data as the Director of Community Development may require. 5• A development plan indi ating the qeneral phasing or anticipated schedule, indicating the total phasing of 111e1 Planned Comrnun; ty and areas to be developed in Pleases and the anticipated time schedule for beg;nninq of construction and for Completion of each phase of development including a pro rata share of anttmities , parks and open space. This is a generalized schedule and may be adlusttd according to market Constraints as the Community develops. t 6. A circular nn Plan, showing existing and proposed public ar ; private slree.ts, pedestrianways, trials, �' and eel„<.•d transportation accuse or circulation H fe•lture5 r ..luirod to serve the proposed development . The circul.ition plan shall be supported by schematic SECTION 7: Adoption of Zone and DeveIO mnent Plan A. An npplirnlion for a Plarrng' I Crnnnur'+ity Z,uno and the i 1 v P••1jrlopa4•nt Plan submitted with the ,tpplicatinn snail be arrl,ier.I to roview and apprr: 111 in the %,tare manner as i Pr''^:cr iheal in Section 61 .0< li of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted by ! rdinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. B. Each Planned Co••m mity Zont established shall be indicated on the 7.orring Map by the litter "PC" followed by a reference uerber identifying each selarate :one. The Development Plan as modified and apl•ro, cd by the City Council , .;hall be considered to be a part of this ordinance , and shall be identified by reference to the corresponding designation of each specific Planned C mimunity Zone on the Zoning Map. SECT_1011 8: Amendments to Development in A. A development Plan may be amended in the same manner as Provided by Section 61 .02: 1 of the San Bernardino County Code as adopted by Ordinance 17 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga for a change of tone boundaries or for a change in the regulations applict: olc with a zone. Amendment of a Development Plan shall ba srrbioct to the same findings as prescrihed for initial •nactinent of a Planned Connnunit'y Zone and adoption or the Development Plan applicable to 4 the Planned Cormunity Zone . B. An amendment to a Dcvelopm •nt Plan may he initiated by the City Planning Conrmissirm or the Council , or may be initiated by the original , pplicant for' the Planned Community Zone or a Succes or thereto, provided such applicant or successor has , at the time of applie atir n for an amendment , a continring controlling interest in development or management r.f uses within the Planue, Crnnmunity Zone. SECTION 9: Review of Development Progress I A. The Direc or of Community Vevelopment shall review each Planned community Zone annuflly, and shall submit a i repgn't to the Planning Commission and City Council con- taining the following: I . A summary, of the clevelupment status within the zone and an assessrmnt of Ivogress during the conpletion of development authorized by thenDeveIopment Plan including adherence to development schedules and phasing. II 2 . A statement of ally changes in land use and dt'velopn'Vot trends economic housing ^rarkct indicators , ce;nnercial and industrial develpPment rates , or pr 'grams for provision of public facilities and scrviccs t•rhich•, in the upinion of the Dirc tor, vary significantly from these upon which%, the Developcnent Plan :ere hatted. and which the affect adversely continued progress too-iar•d cumPletion of development Within tile. zone. D• A cow4 of the annual rtprrt of tho Director p is to the appl shall be parties icant and to such other interested or Successors as deemed aPpropriatc by the — Director. Section 10: The Mayor. ,hall sign thin Ordinance an small .-,ltest to tilem sae, published t•rithin fif and the City Cler d the City Clerk k Shall cause the same to he teen ( I5) days after its passage, at least once in The O.ni I -t-an't Cit y of Ontor-iogeneral ci rculat ion Published in the California, and eir:ulated in the City of Cucacronga, California. Rancho rASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1980. AYES: Sehiosaer-, Nikels , Palonrbo, Bridge, Frost NOES: None' ABSENT: None T) ATTESTS:-? / nWS C. Frost , Ma-or f l•V th ;. Lauren M lJ,tsserman, City '1c k rY)r . ... 01 IBM �. �. HrT- +cri� •'4 1 r _ _. I 1 f�l•f.� .f I,•.�.L�.t {, _ — "'e. .y�: - ,�.In .�'.r yf �ffia�^.� `� •1� � I �• 1 � 1 � `.i �i WW1 �.l la• WB/ Yq\/ �� �' /I'r r // f' C. MAPNOARY j �I' ;'11 � ,t• r �� HAM�