No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/02/28 - Agenda Packet7 NO 1 I1 1 r 4 i i, .k •. 1 L11�. •1 q, 1. Ak s 1 1 1 w 1 ". \ 1 I 7 NO 1 I1 1 r 4 i i, .k •. 1 L11�. •1 q, 1. Ak I. II CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING CONWISSION r1GIsNDA WEDNESDAY JANUARY'28, 1981 7 :00 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner King Commissioner Sceranka �— III. Approval.of Minutes November 12, 1981 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar Commissioner Rwrel Commissioner Tolstoy The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and ncn- controversal. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, then it should be removed for discussion. VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the Public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 mintyas,,per individual for each project. , //� A. -E! NMENTAL ASSESSMENT TRACT NO. 10001' - ZICARELL s4 al subdivision of 9.52 acres w � � of Sand —into ots in R-1 15 zone, generally locate�e north side of Lemon aoproxi -� mat 600 feet east of Archibald - APN nOI 09 i Planning Commission Agenda -2- January 28, 1981 to B.. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. �� djL�,,,` 11625 = TI1E ROBERTS GROUP - A total residential deve o� pment for the deve opment of 101 condominiums on 7.3 acres consisting of two (2) lots, within the R -1 -8,500 zone (pending R -3) located on the north- west corner of 19th Street and Hermosa - APN 202- 17 -01.0 G. H. i 1sa1 — LCW1J — A request for conversion o existing apartments into condominiums, located on a 12 amore site on the north side of 19th Street east of Carnelian. (Sunscape I) of aj - ALIA LUMA MEADOWS — A tract subdivision ots on lb.0 acres within the R -1 -8,500 zone located on the east side of Carnelian north of 19th Street - APN 202 -221 -042 -... . 4JJ.'141\ 1 nl \V 1 C.1\ I A l 1 V C I KAL I NU. 158 - CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS - A custom lot sub - ivision of 0 single fa—M y lots on 10.8 acres in the R- 1- 8,500 -T zone generally located on the south west corner of Carnelian and Highland - APN 201 -214- 05 1VL•• - onallnnaHn - A custom lot subdivision cons sting of 30 lots on 24.36 acres of land in the A -1 -5 zone located on the north side of Almond Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN 1061- 171 -02. Z.C. 80 -12 (A -1 -5 to R -1 -20) ..... -.a_.. Ina. ns.a r.JJrICIYI ANU YAKLEL MAP NO. - 6561 -6}• SEVEN$ - An industria subdivis on of 6.09 acres into 2 parcels with the M -R zone located on th-4- west side of Hellman Avenue, 433 feet + south of_`' S l A* 9th Street - APN 209- 013 -24 ENVIRONMENTAI 6CCCCcmrRm eun L11WI\ - n commercial subdivision of 1 .65�f 'lard into 3 parcels within the M -2 zone located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route - APN 208 - 351 -13 t f•}� 5 � Planning Commission Agenda -3- January 28, 1981 VII AId �1{�sip�lv�a v I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTOR RENEW N0. 81 -03 iNTFGHATFD (n WAYNE BUTT FR) -The construction of four (4) industrial buildings totalling 49,528 sq. ft. on 6.77 acres of land in the M -R zone located at 8787 Hellman Avenue - APN 209 - 011 -43 VIII. New Business IX. Council Referrals X. Director's Reports G-.�J. ZONING ORDINANCE DETERMINATION NO. 81 -01 - SNAPP - A self-serve car wash within the C -1 zone. . K. RESOLUTION OF PROJECTS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANK COMMISSION UNDER THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS XI. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not PIready appear on this Agenda. XII. Upcoming Agenda XIII. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. This regular meeting of the Planning Commission is adjourned to a public hearing on the General Plan on February 2, 1981 at the Lion's Park Community Center at 9161 Base Line Road, at 7:00 p.m. Please Note: Due to th a a f California City's Planning Commissioner's t ere will be no regular meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission on Pebruaiy 11, 1981_ i ItS �� tt bA O CU U U 0 4 0 �V i� i — CITY OF RANCHO CUCA.MIONGA &CAM � MEMORANDUM DATE: January 28, 19S'l 0 - TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner SUBJECT: THOMAS HARRIS - Turner, south of Base Line ABSTRACT: Contained within this memo and its attachments are staff's suggestion for the site in question. Action on this item is requested. DISCUSSION: During the first filing period in August '1980, Thomas Harris, architect for the project, submitted a planned development (approximately 6 du /ac) for a portion of the site under consideration. It was their an- ticipation that this site would be in conformance with the General Plan and the density bonuses that were being considered at that time. Since August of 1980, density bonuses have been removed from the Interim Zoning Ordinance and from the General Plan therefore leaving a 6 -unit per acre project proposed in the area of 2 -4 low density residential. Mr. Harris is requesting that the Planning Commission consider a 5 -8 low medium de- signation for this property. We have included for the Commission's in- formation in the attachnents, a General Plan location map, a reduced detailed site plan of the proposed property under consideration, and a reduction of the development within the area. As the Commission will recall, at the end of Ironwood Street you recently approved a 7 -lot subdivision which cut -de -sacs Ironwood Street immediately north of this project. The project which was su Witted in August 1980 occupies about one- quarter of the total land available in the vicinity. Because of the variety of-.street locations and the difficulty that may be incurred in the development of the property, we would suggest that a low- medium category designation for this property may be appropriate. However, we would also suggest that a master plan designation be required such that any development on a portion of the property would require con- ceptual master planning for the remainder of the property in the low - medium category within the boundaries of Ramona and Turner. RECOMMENDATION: It. is recommended that the Planning Caomission consi- der 5 -8 u /ac for the property shown in the attached exhibits. tfu lly"sutY.ryf tted, CirJ Planner BKII:jk Attachments I I cx T�GT`( MAP INTERIM PLAN Low Residential VERY LOW 2 DU /AC LOW 2 -4 DU/AC LOW- MEDIUM 5 -8 DU /AC MEDIUM 5 -14 DU /AC MED. HIGH 15 -24 DU/AC HIGH 25 -30 DU /AC COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL NEIGHBOHOOD 1 i ■ ■ ■ OFFICE r INDUSTRIAL PARK GENERAL .INDUSTRIAL GENERAL INDUS. RAIL SERVED HEAVY I�lD""T'RIAL HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE FLOOD CONTROL UTILITY CORR. Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) REQUEST: Low Medium Residential (5 -8 du /ac) ANALYSIS: The site comprises 20 + acres and is therei'ore large enough to accommodate appropriately ^1.z;,ned low- medium density developments. The first developer in the area, Tract 11610, should be required to plan out the circulation of the entire area to pro!ide a system compatible with the existing surrounding residential subdivisions. RECOMMENDATION: APPLICANT: Staff Initiated AP' 1077 - 031 - 1,2,3,4 ITEM NO* s i tl D i D v0 �• 3 i �i • i� faQ .G z� !S's y�l f 'I i r . 9 `G �•'J •O �3 Q�.i�lta .L a .t �e 2�a, U:�a? a'4 aV a•��4� r3 -OR -O -36 -G 3 -u _w ¢ m'S '4+.•t. 'm1[', . faQ .G z� !S's y�l f 'I i r . 9 JL i HOMAS D. HARRIS, A.I.A. Q► R C H 6 T E C T January 20, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department At:n: Mr. Berry Hogan Subject: 28 Unit Planned Residential Development - Turner Avenue Between Baseline and Church for RLS Associates, Inc., Los Gatos, CA Gentlemen: The Sanchez family, represented by Mr. Roland Sanchez, requests a hearing before the Planning Commission at the next scheduled meeting for the purpose of discussing the density of their proposed project as it relates to the proposed general plan. Please contact this office regarding the granting of this request. Thank you Very trilly yo S, 0 S U. HARRIS, AIA Architect TDH:dj 130 EAST 9TH ST., UPLAND, CA. 91786, 714/981 -3632 C, i ��5 Jai•.; a z yN? � y p�V.yirN 1�- w W 2 N I n- �k r ry k Y YEiw p o' k `5•�- O O Yc o. s Ny ❑ C]o V 4O, W 1� `VT• } 4� V v W 9� LLJ z U _, d 1 � :n = I 1 E 1�- w W 2 N I n- �k r ry k Y YEiw p o' k `5•�- yy.`-teaa ybad 1�- w W 2 N I n- �k r r I v �• I y`, I ��„ Q .79 AYH 1s ivory ev UA I 1 C r 1 11 `o r' r 1 � s � � 1 � I: cqr H.n r v I I 2 a N V to Y 81 r ■ i1v i ry l III I p o' oil yyo Ny ❑ C]o :Y r I v �• I y`, I ��„ Q .79 AYH 1s ivory ev UA I 1 C r 1 11 `o r' r 1 � s � � 1 � I: cqr H.n r v I I 2 a N V to Y 81 r ■ i1v i 111 1 � :n I �• , 1 IY'o �$$ i ti r Ij• Ik Z' LY.. Why �I F, t 1� I r r I v �• I y`, I ��„ Q .79 AYH 1s ivory ev UA I 1 C r 1 11 `o r' r 1 � s � � 1 � I: cqr H.n r v I I 2 a N V to Y 81 r ■ i1v i JOHN D. LUSK & SON A MEMSEL OF THE LUSK FAMILY OF COMPA141ES 17550 611feMu Ave., Irvlm Industrial ComPlax - P.O. Dom 619560, Irvine, Calif. 92713 - 1714) 557 -8220 - (213) 7266841 January 26, 1981 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Mr. Jack Lamb Planning Director Re: Lusk Property Northwest Corner of Archibald $ Forth Avenue Tax Parcels No. 210 - 062 -02, 13, 26, 32 and 33 -- 54.8 Acres Gentlemen: On December 22, 7.980, we forwarded to you the attached letter in which we requested your favorable consideration in providing commercial and medium high residential land -use for our property. On Friday, January 23, 1981 we met with three of the other property owners who own property in the 160 acres bounded by Fourth Street, Sixth Street and Archibald to review various land -use alternatives. As a result of this meeting, we are writing to re- confirm you our request that the property owned by JOHN D. LUSK £; SON as referenced above be favorably considered for comnerci.al and medium high density residential land uses. We have requested Mr. Bill Patton, who represents one of the other landowners in the area, to read both our letter of December 22, 1980 and this letter into the record inasmuch as we will be unable to attend the hearing scheduled for Monday, January 26, 1981. Thank you for your consideration of our request. Very truly yours, JOI-1 D. LUSK E SON Donald D. ;S'ensen Senior Vice President DDS:sm 'le, JOHN D. LUSK & SON A MEMOE0 OF THE LUSY. FAIVIRN OF COMPANIES 17560 61fle"a Ave., In1M IndaArlrl Camoln • P.O. Ocrt C-19SQ. Irvin.. Calif. Will • 17141 SG7.02211 • (2121 7244541 December 22, 1980 City of Rancho Cucamonga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. Sack Lamb Director of Planning Res: Lusk Property - Northwest Corner of Archibald & Fourth Avenue /Tax Parcels No. 210- 062 -02, 13, 26, 32 and 33 - 54.8 Gross Acres Gentlemen: It is our understanding that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is currently considering revisions to the land use element of the General Plan. It is our further understanding that the current suggested land use for the subject property would be for residential use in the medium category; 5 to 14 units per acre. The property presently carries a land use designation of service commercial on the portion of property fronting on Fourth Avenue between Archibald and Cucamonga Creek with residential designation on the balance. Based upon our review of the subject property and its proximity to both the Cucamonga industrial area and the Ontario International Airport, we would respectfully request your favorable consideration of the following land uses (see attached map): 1. On Parcels 2, 13 and 25 which comprise approximately 30.54 gross acres and which have frontage on both Archibald Avenue and Fourth Avenue, we would request a continued commercial designation. It is our understanding that the service commercial designation has been changed to reflect straight commercial; however, our marketing indicates the potential :r Mr. Jack Page 2 December 22, 1580 use of this property would be for uses formerly considered as service commercial. 2. For Parcels 32 and 33, we would request a designation for residential medium high density allowing 15 to 24 dwelling units per acre. This designation has been requested on the basis of our understanding that the Ci,,y is interested in having more modestly priced housing avaaillable for employees in the adjacent industrial and commercial areas. Our experience would indicate that densities of 15 to 20 units per acre will be necessary in order to provide housing in price ranges to meet the income ranges for the employees for these areas. Your favorable consideration of the foregoing will be appreciated. Should you have any questions with regard to our request, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, JOHN D. LUSK & SON i Donald D. Steffensen Senior Vice President DDS:ks cucamonca, Ontat ao City 210-03 I.B. J5150 -56 - Tax Code Area- 6701040,a 1 29 _ = 40� � 1.71 `V� t o A8 aC Q i t T Z - 3.54ACAVL 2Ci�G 18.30 SACM/L I ism st/t 23 ^ ® 2 a • 93 nC, t.VL 98.744, n{/1- Llo�GD ' - - 804 25 I7.lj�eAL M/L• • tr- \ag �.: o � . t 3 2 SkC 929 Ac. , IT. 84 AC t i /L'. .... w r74 16 Assessors XTA1 ` - s - ® (4Z sync CITY OF <l > RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION Z AGENDA o - 1977 WEDNESDAY JANUARY 28, 1981 7.00 P.M. ACTION LION'S PARK COMMUNIYY CENTER 9161 BASE 'LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Pledge or' Allegiance II. Roll Cali Conanissicner Dahl Commissioner Rempel Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Scerarka III. Approval of Minutes November 12, 1981 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar VA-_ followin3 consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non- cortroversal. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. if anyone hac concern over any item, then it should be removed for discussion. VI. Public Hearings The following items are pub is hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the chairman and address the commission from the public ,iicrophone by givii:g your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 mintues per individual for each project. tv .ldrawn by applicant A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TRACT NO. 10001 - ZICARELLI - A residential subdivision of 9.52 acres of —wand into 22 lots in the R -1 -15 zone, 5enerallj located on t)e north side of Lemon Avenue, approxi- mately 600 feet exit of Archibald - APM 201 - 251 -09 l Planning Commissior Agenda -2- January 28, 1981 . A roved 5 -0 -0 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 11625 - 1HE ROBERTS GROUP - A total residential development for the development of 10i condominiums on 7.3 acres consisting of two (2) lots, within the R -1 -8,500 zone (pending R -3) located on the north- west corner of 19th Street and Hermosa - APN 202- 17 -010 Contir.*jed to Feb. 25, 1981 C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO 11460 - LEWIS - A request for conversion of 172 existing apartments into condominiums, located on a 12 acre site on the north side of 19th Street east of Carnelian. (Sunscape I) Removed from Agenda o b� D. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO a reeaa vertised 73369 - ALTA LO MA MEADOWS - A tract subdivision of 5 ots on '. acres within the R -1 -8,500 zone located on the east side of Carnelian north of 19th Street - APN 202 - 221 -042 Continued to Feb. 25, 1981 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND "TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11581 - CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS AA custom lot sub - division of 40 singe Family )ots on 1G.8 acres in the R- 1- 8,500 -T zone generally located on the south west corner of Carnelian and Highland - APN 201 -214- 05 Continued to Feb. 25, 1981 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO` 10 - BRRMAKIAN - A custom lot subdivision consisting of7Y0'lots on 24.36 acres of )and in the A -1 -5 zone located on the north side of Almond Road, east of Carnelian Street - APN 1061- 171 -02. Z.C. 80 -12 (A -1 -5 to R -1 -20) Ac roved 5 -0-0 To G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP N(1. 663E accept parcel with dedi- cat.nn of Lior. St. to Hellman EVEN5 - An �n ustria sub vision of 6. 9 acres into sidewalk required, provision 2 parcels with the M -R zone located on the west side of Hellman Avenue, 433 feet for emergency access and + south of 9th Street - APN 209- 013 -24 correction to condition no. 8 from no. 7 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 6617 DAON - A commercia subdivision of 1 .65 acres of ITEM H• Approved 5 -0 -0 land into 3 parcels within the M -2 zone located at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route - APN 208 - 351 -13 A roved 4-1 -0 'ith Resolution amend- ment (King) Approved 5 -0 -0 Approved 5 -0 -0 To adopt Resolution Approved 3 -2 -0 Industrial Park Desin- nation for area of - 4th and Archibald. Planning Commission Agenda -3 January 28, 1981 VI1. Old Business I. u[ -ua - The construction of four (4) -industrial buildings totalling 49,528 sq. ft. on 6.77 acres of 'land in the M -R zone located at 8787 Hellman Avenue - APN 209- 011 -43 VIII. New Business IX. X. XI. Approved 5 -0 -0 urT ner - Church XII. Request to low -med residential (5 -8 du /ac) XIII. " A roved 5 -0-0 Tfi_a_t__s_cTool sites as shown on map are tentative (floating) Council Referrals Director's Reports J. ZONING ORDINANCE DETERMINATION NO. 81 -01 - SNAPP - A self -serve car wash within the C -1 zone. K. RESOLUTION OF PROJECTS TO BE REVI Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this Agenda. Upcoming Agenda Adjournment The planning commnission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the commission. This regular meeting of the Planning Commission is adjourned to a public hearing on the General Plan on February 2, 1981 at the Lion's Park Community Center at 9161 Base Line Road, at 7:00 p.m, Please Note: Due to the League of California City's Planning Commissioner's Conference, there will be no regular meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission on February 11, 1981. CIC ho O E U A lJ O U C cz e C a Z CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 22, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner SUBJECT: 'WINERIES ABSTRACT: This memo will suggest a way in which the winery issue can be dept with at the General Plan level and explain how implementation might occur. Your approval of the recommendation is desired. DISCUSSION: At the last Planning Commission General Plan hearing there was considerable discussion over the issue of wineries within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. To our knowledge there are 3 commercial wineries operating within the City that attract visitors arsd sell wine on site. There may be other wineries existing in the City that bottle wine or crush grapes, but do not sell on site or attract visitors as a supplement to income. The 3 wineries that are in operation for commercial purposes that attract visitors for income and sell wine on site are Opici Winery, T1.omas Winery (designated City Histori- cal Landmark), and Pierre Biane (Old Cucamonga Winery). During the hearings on the John Blaney General Plan this discussion of the wineries arose. It was decided at that time, to include a paragraph in the Text describing the City's intent in handling the issue of wineries. The paragraph reads as follows: "Additionally, there are several historical areas, such as wineries, that will have to be carefully studied as a mixed commercial usage area with possible provision for restaurants and retail wine sales shops." Some action has been taken to designate wineries as Historical Landmarks or sites. Specifically the Historical Commission has designated the Thomas Winery as a City Historical Landmark and Aggazzotti Winery site as a City Historical Site. As the Commission is aware, Opici Winery will be brought before the Historical Commission for possible designation as a. Historical Landmark. The other existing winery, Pierre Biane Winery in Cucamonga, has not requested any such designation. In order to resolve the question of what to do with wineries now, we suggest that a paragraph be added to the text of the Sedway /Cooke General Plan as follows: "Wineries have played a significant role in the culture and heritage of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 'cxistirg wineries that operate for the purpose of selling bottled wine, or as a historic landmark should be allowed to continue to operate and expand their operations to in- clude restaurants, retail wine sales, gift shops, and other related activity. It is not meant to encourage new wineries to begin operation Wineries -2- January 22, 1981 within the City, but to preserve those wineries currently in operation. Questions arose at the Planning Commission as to how this procedure might be implemented. We would suggest that there are a variety of alternatives available to the Planning Commission, all of which fall within the category of zoning. It is possible that in the zoning districts of residential, commercial, and industrial, a cetegory of Winery could be added describing the particular uses allowable on a winery site and allow expansion of facilities or additions of facilities to the site through a Conditional Use Permit process. The question arose as to what happens to the site should the winery operation cease and, for instance, the restaurant operation on the site wish to continue. We would suggest, because of the fact that none of the wineries in the City now contain a restaurant site, that the apprf)val of a restaurant on a winery site would be conditional upon the cont ±nued operation of the winery prior to the approval, of application for the restaurant, i.e., if the winery discontinues its use then the restaurant must discontinue its use. The specifics of the implementation question, i.e. zoning, should be taken up at the time of consideration of the Zoning Ordi- nance to implement the General Plan. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission direct Staff to inc ude the above - mentioned paragraph in the Sedway /Cooke General Plan Text. .nu.�u ad, E 11 SUBEJCT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 1RACT NO. 10001 - ZICARELLI - A rc-A dential subdivision of 9.52 acres of land into 22 tats ir. the R -1 -15 zone, generally located on the north side of Lemon AveriAe, approximately 600 feet east of Archibald - APN 201 -251- 09 ABSTRACT: This tract has been continued several times at the request of the applicant to clerify and work out several design considerations of the tract. The latest continuance from the January 14, 1981 meeting was to allow the applicant the opportunity to discuss the drainage channel improve- ments withthe City Engineer and the Flood Control District. The City Engineer has decided, based upon the outcome of that meeting, that the improvements as recommended in the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval, are the minimum necessary to adequately protect this development from flooding. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive public input. If, after such hearing, the Com- mission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, then adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions would be appropriate. ly submitted, RRY '. HOGAN ty lanner BKH:MV:cd Attachments: Memorandum of January 14, 1981 Staff Report of December 10, 1980 Resolution and Conditions ITEM A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM oG��cnn�r�,ls <� e z O - DATE: January 28, 1981 F v TO: Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBEJCT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 1RACT NO. 10001 - ZICARELLI - A rc-A dential subdivision of 9.52 acres of land into 22 tats ir. the R -1 -15 zone, generally located on the north side of Lemon AveriAe, approximately 600 feet east of Archibald - APN 201 -251- 09 ABSTRACT: This tract has been continued several times at the request of the applicant to clerify and work out several design considerations of the tract. The latest continuance from the January 14, 1981 meeting was to allow the applicant the opportunity to discuss the drainage channel improve- ments withthe City Engineer and the Flood Control District. The City Engineer has decided, based upon the outcome of that meeting, that the improvements as recommended in the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval, are the minimum necessary to adequately protect this development from flooding. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive public input. If, after such hearing, the Com- mission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, then adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions would be appropriate. ly submitted, RRY '. HOGAN ty lanner BKH:MV:cd Attachments: Memorandum of January 14, 1981 Staff Report of December 10, 1980 Resolution and Conditions ITEM A El 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM � • r �� DATE: January 14, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael D. Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TENTATIVE TRACT 140. 10001 - ZICARELLI - A Residential Subdivision of 9.52 acres of land into 22 lots in the R- 1- 15,000 zone generally located on the north side of Lemon Avenue, approximately 600 feet east of Archibald - APN 201- 251 -09. ABSTRACT: This tract first came before the Planning Commission at its meeting of December 10, 1980. At that time, the applicant requested a continuance to this date to allow necessary time to resolve fire access. The applicant has indicated to Staff that he and the Foothill Fire District have mutually agreed upon a solut'.on to fire access. Therefore, Staff has revised the con- ditions of approval to reflect the agreement between the devel- oper and the Foothill Fire District and is now presenting this tract for your review and consideration. The detailed staff report which was provided for the Commission on December 10, 1980, is attached for your review. If the Planning Commission concurs with that report and its findings, then adoption of the attached Resolution and Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. BACY.GROUND: As the subdivision is presently designed, two new inter or streets running northward from Lemon Avenue are being proposed. These streets terminate at the north boundary of the tract which will permit the logical extention of the streets into the area north of the project which is presently vacant and unde- veloped. Normally, this would be an acceptable design to the Fire District because fire apparatus would be able to turn or maneuver on the vacant land at the terminus of the street. However, in this situation, a drainage course transverses across the north boundary of the project site and connects into the Flood Control District drainage facility which borders the east boundary of the project. As this northern drainage is substantial, no vehicle access across the drainage culvert can occur. Therefore, the Fire District has Tentative Tract 10001- Zicarelli January 14, 1981 Ob Page 2 indicated that they are unable to maneuver fire apparatus out of this secondary access for this tract in a safe manner. ANALYSIS: The Subdivider and the Foothill Fire District have met and have decided upon a method to provide appropriate turn around for fire apparatus. The Fire District has requested that lot 15 of the tract, the most northeasterly lot on the tract, not be built upon and be reserved for a fire turn around area until such time that the streets within the subdivision are continued northward to provide appropriate through circulation. A Condition of Approval has been included in the Resolution which recommends that this lot be maintained for fire access in accordance with the Foothill Fire District standards and requirements. Deed restrictions shall be developed for this lot which will specifically outline such use until permanent access northward can be provided. In addition, Staff has recom- mended in the Conditions of Approval that the fire lane needed on the lot be turf blocked and that the remaining portion of the site be turfed and irrigated and maintained as usable open space for the residents of this tract. This would provide a temporary mini -park for the residents and would help keep the lot in a presentable condition until the permanent access can be completed. Similar fire access situations have been required on other subdivisions and have created a vacant, unmaintained lot, which becomes a local dumping ground for residents in ad- dition to creating disturbances and hazards to the people within the tract. If the lot was landscaped and maintained as usable open space, then this would prevent dumping and problems such as weeds, dust control, and safety. Precise plans on the devel- opment of the lot for usable open space and fire apparatus turn around is required prior to final recordation of the map. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a pubic hearing to receive public input. If, after such hearing, Commission concurs with the finding of the Con- ditions of Approval, the adoption of the attached Resolution of Ap6Woval with Conditions would be appropriate. ty :jr ubmitted, Attachments: December 10, 1980 Planning Commission Staff Report LIAII 0 10 i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAF F REPORT Date: December 10, 1980 To: Planning Commission From: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner By: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. A residential subdivision of 9.52 acres into 22 1 zone generally located on the north side of Lemon mately 600' east of Archibald - APN 201 - 251 -09 1977 - ZICARELLI - n the R -1 -15,0 Avenue, approxi- BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval of a residential subdivision of 9.52 acres of land intu 22 single family residential lots. The project site is located on the north side of Lemon Street, approximately 600' east of ArclA bald Avenue (Exhibit "A "). The property is presently zoned R -1- 15,000 permitting the development of single family residential units on minimum 15,000 square foot lots. The site is generally vacant and sloping approximately 4% to the south. The site does contain numerous mature trees along Lemon Avenue in addition to a small house which is proposed to be removed. Surrounding land uses are comprised of single family uses, vacant land, and agricultural uses. There is an existing San Bernardino County Flood Control ease-aent which abuts the east boundary of the project site. The project has been reviewed by the Growth Management Review Committee as a custom /tract subdivision in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance and has met the minimum threshold point limit, thus eligible for consideration of approval by the planning Commission. ANALYSIS: The tentative map has been prepared in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The proposed lot size, width and depth meet the minimum requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Access to the tract is being provided by two new interior streets from Lemon Avenue. The new interior streets will be dedicated and improved in accordance wish City Engineering Standards. The design of the subdivision will allow for logical extension of streets and development to the north. There is adequate land available to the north for a compatible residential development. No exterior landscape parkways are proposed within this development. The parkway along Lots 7, 8 and 22 should be redesigned to relocate the sidewalk adjacent to the curb in order to maintain the existing mature trees that are located along that boundary line. It is recommended that other mature trees throughout the tract be maintained where street improvements will not require -1 0 ry ti ia j i i I I I AV* LL-1 I I o ie I', Environmental Assessm;_-,s� and Tentative Tract No. 10001( Page 2 them to be removed. A detailed plan must be submitted to the Planning Division prior to recordation of the tract map to indicate which trees ?re to be saved and removed. Such details must be included in the final grading plan. The subdivision. has been submitted as a custom lot /tract subdivision and therefore has not provided site plans or building design. If this sub- division is to be developed as a tract, then the applicant is required to submit necessary site plans and building designs for review and approval. Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field investigation and has found no significant adverse impacts upon the environment. It is recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued for this project. CORRESPONDENCE: The Tentative Tract Map was advertised as a public hearing item in The Daily Report newspaper. To date, no correspondence for or against the project has been received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive public input. If, after such hearing, the Com- mission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, then adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions would be appropriate. BKH:MV:nm Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Part I, Resolut d, "A ", Location Map "B ", Tract Map "C ", Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan Initial Study ion of Approval E 11 E TENTATIVE MAP TRACT. NO 10001 j OWNFN % nevtLOrE1C 9NILLIPJ. tICA9t LLI 9.(I 2DM LrT $•LAMA.t &c. CA. 41015 L (111) 461 -01W rub-NE-EA "WEA4EW ENLF. Co. JEC V ftlT \li CAL" wIILA (VA) (.14 -1449 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOAICIA OEM16 A PAn POGtb !'URgIJIg104 Co' LOT 40, Or CgnTVIU KXW5%E'S9 tHUIT CO., TRACT Nb 1, IN TMt CCUNTV CIr SAN 6ERNAAn'N(\,4TATE OP CAUL. A5 9EIt MAP REWrmen NI IbT, 1o• VA.DA nr M&N. IN THE OfnCE Or 70t COUNTY 71@CDAfitL Dr yI0 MMTY. JUL4 LO.1 "m TN%ll1C l 4 A CU4TOV LM 9WONI4bN LITILITIC'. ubrE •JC VEE'NAlEIL ANrrnr4 .A•wnrw In wn +•n•r •xn :A .C:•.NI \Il nr.l. V•+Yn a.LL.•YUxM.IriR ••Dr1 •••D �•V +%rY•xMMVr.D. M.•4 lJrrrrnlV, +•r.•nV t4W •n a. CJ:•rM1V• G. •ri 1G .•.nCµ. .1.NY V AAnCr+. (MI •A11.1• Yx�wnWl 4Mlrl. 945 tDr mwn.•ln rwa ¢Ae 1...r pY •IVO..+•! LM w •fw.axr ELECIRM. we.Lw Saw rn. Ine\ •..wfraL w..n. tim w iI sn.\n. TOLtPM t w.m. vIr !D lr•w r aW •f.. Trr•N.••t '.'4L I•r•I LI..V...L flAt PROItCT: Mrnr. V M 0r1 9Lif wM1 wNw.ewn •w (uY�•xW [ I•w ..., nwD tx•Wr1I.� I 1 (] 9 ui'I• 1 ••tw� Yw4 I � . \, \C4• I 9 1 I 1 4n 11n V y r • r • w! 1 N I wry I 11 I 1 II w\ l� �at'C TALiz :1 J JI � I 1 R 19 r n ,•r. - wR r1. r I � ' • ' t Olq 1 wYi r V,•V 1 OI r r 4vi wn.• wA um.•w •wN� yI rwgy 4A9 r_ A `• • r w.+• AI w.r v.. wa• r V •D L: � __Lf MI)N - T —�•JI .- -. _Sr^__ �J_J -�_ .a_•• ^ ` 4444. .1.1 . � - .� -. —w•. L Ay ` -dD' •C. x _ I Mlrr f• V.V4wxMUw nN. 4•M. 4.VnrN rV.•.MwO •:• f!A w'VwV• 90••. wr•4 •4.0 N q•YMM P .9 �Iw'r.0 4f L7 i/ 0 1A 11 w J Z T4 1 R 19 r n A `• • r w.+• AI w.r v.. wa• r V •D L: � __Lf MI)N - T —�•JI .- -. _Sr^__ �J_J -�_ .a_•• ^ ` 4444. .1.1 . � - .� -. —w•. L Ay ` -dD' •C. x _ I Mlrr f• V.V4wxMUw nN. 4•M. 4.VnrN rV.•.MwO •:• f!A w'VwV• 90••. wr•4 •4.0 N q•YMM P .9 �Iw'r.0 4f L7 i/ 0 1A 11 AOL I( 3 S •I J 91L� •� z try Y C ro \ dd - -- I I �1N4 ��. •�I11W/ rW NNH MIbJI. .anpMM N�iG � I I I. hk i I !- I -I \ I•f I \ k t p 1.7'Ct11 _ r I \ C 1 x X1.6 aw III,� �_ \ —�.. \ I____... �.�._� ���— I,•'.) I ` I •\ ' • i 1 E .. � I+ e • s 9 � 4" CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review ?ee: $70.00 I Fox all projects requiring environmental review, thi:, form must be completed and submitted to the, Devel.opmert Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part. II Of t1ne Initial. Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than te-a (10) days before the public meeting at which time tl-a project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative DCclaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concernii•g• the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: -'MT L(Si 1( ()Cti ((jC,jQi� ,Ltll �I�i�171di� :Ui1 i APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: '.1'j3S9eti' .d.. Z1G.�.Qt=LLi '• -; -, - , . ... t C1 i4) 4�-A -0 1 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPIONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: .AWH-,1✓A(;K4 C-146Q, r -C✓ f�CCi AAnAEA'Sr.l.4•- C.[.1 =_ :.art- : =.i•.r 1a OnOU n� :c 7_.n...... �.. Ll 14) V'L "h lh�i LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) - -ni —Q] - --liC Is C/+ NLtz:,N cAye C,P i.BMCA /..Yi3 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STAr'F. AND FEDERAL, AGENCIES AND TEiE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 E J .. PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: C• >., t?% /Iy it2M.'t4 to LXJ' ter,..' 1 =L 6i5i �; 'Tt� r' -�tJI PL:�f i• {'I'(d IZAL U Axl ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: I -;-7'L ACRES - F_Xk� ri S r ItCCj-CZr- �J CC) tC;, UT. - FL_ u(x_'SC A ��Fhi'ds<fJ PV4FC.ScP �'% C %^%,2 5 VAiiilYi• - -ia C i�i�C.ft `f'1�+ DESCRIBE TIME ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AIM THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY . EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): htil►lvhL. y4Et0 A11O (.CA`s >cS i'NtRC !.i e Mo ey—Cu' ff<c S CP S7IV: FCU.EtiF LTHG2`( (1r- cCC G`7,: WAE(caCF, eLoteS — N�uC.tsoi.iA!>.G G.1.'•iL:�gi: -> L_iC;f.1G t,f'.i Si�C --� .Opi��r'� C -4E.tC MirC F <�RG:aSD 9i:' f_y. Tt�G4 - Au2� uL NISYC t2 iGpl�s c l t i r r O �Grli P65 gG 4 'To TiiiS SiTe "THCCC t• a 5 Wia -k-L. 14CC:�' L— C. tS ' >• n k.. ('� E PT' •r u.MNA:i^( i�'rtGein;C, _FLAi4) is =Ni(N IS To E>C �tt+�Ctr - L r -- S f - 51 .; 1L�i _ r -__r. uu i i Is the project, part of a larger project, ona of a series' Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant envirotunental impact? 4 I.- 4 WI Id_T1113 1'R0.7FCT : YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing] \/ noise or vibration? �L 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)'. S. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? ' 5: Remove any existing trees? How many ?�— 6. Create the reed for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials su h as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? •. Explanation of any YES answers above: RC gF,GC7 Ptic �1� �T `rDC7 i =nl� jN a—I IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented-are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evauuation can be made by the Development Review Committee. j Date Signature A Title T-3 .s' RFSIDEr ??'IAL CQT ?5TP.I!CI`IO "1 The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to nid in assessing the abilLty of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development: Name of Developer ar.d Tentative Tract No.: I't1}UF �. ZiCAQELi_1 - "�(�1' Ili( p Specific Location of Project: KpRTH 6AV V LEMOR (EVE. - CAU'' ARC (WbJ�Lb PHASE I PHASE 2 PIIASE 3 PIIASr 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: �`1- _ X _ V- 2. Number of multiple family units: h1014G Date proposed to begin construction: WVK144wN 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model # and r of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Rance UNKNOLk)W (bC..CA. VSG TNIc� TCZA(GT 162 A Cur-,TO" L-UT �i1�DgVIG4�1 Sr� , ► +' J 11 r RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA4ONGA, CALIFORNIA. CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10001. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10001, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Zicarelli, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 9.52 acres of land located on the north side of Lemon Avenue 600' east of Archibald and being divided into 22 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on January 28, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner subject to all conditions set forth Divisions reports; and has recommended approval of the Map in the Engineering and Planning WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard ,D Tentative Tract No. 10001 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all 4pplicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the is environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10001, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following corditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. Per the Foothill Fire District require:.-nts,, Lot 15 of this tract must not be built upon and shall be maintained as a temporary fi re turn around area. This shall be maintained for this use until development to the north and the continuation of the street to provide thru access is accomplished. C.C. & R. 's shall be develo,2d for this site to reflect the required restric;.ion and shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Foothill Fire District for review and approval prior to recordation of the map. The map and C.C. & R. 's shall be recorded concurrently. 2. The turn around area for the fire apparatus on lot 15 shall be turf blocked. The remaining portion shall be turfed and irrigated and maintained as useable open space for the residents of the tract until such time that the fire access is no longer needed. A detailed plan of this design shall be submitted to the Planning Division and Foothill Fire District for review and approvai prior to recordation of the map. 3. The trees along Lemca Avenue shall be retained. The grading plan shall indicate the retention of the trees and relocation of the sidewalk, to accommodate the trees. En4ineering Division 4. Design and installation of improved rectangular channel facility for Alta Loma channel contiguous to subject tract including inlet and outlet structures shall be required. The construction cost of the channel shall be credited to the stormdrain fee and a reimbursement agreement will be executed per section 8 of the City Ordinance No. 75 to cover contributions which exceed the amount of these fees. 5. A letter from Flood Control District accepting the design of the channel and adequacy of the right -of -way width shall be obtained prior to recordation of the map. The applicant shall meet all the requirements of the Flood Control District. 11 Resolution No. Page 3 ® 61 Adequate provisions, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, must be made to protect frcm flooding and erosion from the existing unimproved channel at the north tract boundary. An erosion control and flood protection plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer shall be required prior to recordation of the map. 7. All existing easements lying within the future right -of- way are to be quit claimed or delineated per the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 8. At the time of underground utility installation and prior to installation of street improvements, the developer shall contact the appropriate cable television company for the area and make arrangements which would give the company the opportunity to install cable at the time of trenching. If the cable television company does not install cable, then the developer shall install conduit and pull boxes throughout the tract. Such derails shall be shown and verified on the improvement plans. 9. A minimum of 26' of pavement shall be required on London Avenue. The existing 30' offer of Dedication along the west side of London Avenue may be used for the extra required width with appropriate permission and approval. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was.duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject:.._____� 0 Applicant: Z I,Ciit,ReLie l These items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development _ 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at ® time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. _ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 'l. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. _ 9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. —ZlO. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. _ 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of is shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. _ 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. _ 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. • _ 16., All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. VO 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. Security devices suchas window locks shall be installed on each unit. _ 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. _Z22. Emergency secondary access shal', be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. _ 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. _ 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. _ 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with eneral Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall ba submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. B. - Parking and Vehicular Access _ 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. _ 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. _ 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. &. R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaping �1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. �2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. U _ / 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever oossible and shall hp _Z8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. _ 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. �10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted a-Athin the project. _ 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along El trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially da:igerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. _ 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70 % -15 gallon, and 10°V -5 gallon. 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of cus-tom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. _Z8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. _ 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. �10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted a-Athin the project. _ 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along El C D. Signs _ 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinancq and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. _ 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. _ 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. _ 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. -is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Var once Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The developer is required to obtain the following -igned statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on ' I have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. _Z6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision mai. is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. _Z7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. —AZ8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or buiilding permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approvai of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. ,Z9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Site Development _jel. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. _1e!f0'2'. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. �3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. _ 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. �6. Street naines and addresses shall be provided by the building official. 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances `— considering use, area and fire- resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped ` to comply with appropriate grading practises and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Gradin —Z 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall �e completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuanca of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of ail interior street rights -of -way and all necessary k >asements as shown on the tentative map. _'°2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on/,�,?y�Q A�vedl e additional feet on additional feet on —Z3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. _ 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the Iroposed business. J. Street Improvements �1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and • gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. —Z2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. J— OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER. P000 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained prom the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. ✓4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. '• --Z5. Surety shall be posted and lan agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Cit; Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. !06. All street improvements shall be installed to ',ie satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. ✓7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be install per the requirements of the City Engineer. I K. Drainage and Flood Contrw _Z1. The applicant will be responsible fur consti.iction of all tmsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations- —Z-3. 3. The proposed project falls within areas ineicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program ind is subject to the provisions or the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection Nall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet, runoff t: street. 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connection flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveway, at property line. L. Utilities All proposed utilities within the project :hall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials 'ess than 12 V. �2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. _Z3. Developer shall be responsible for the relo:ation of existing public utilities. as required. be 4. Developer shall be responsible for the instillation of street lighting in accordance with Souttiern California Edison i:orpany and City standards. _Z5. Water and sewer system plans shall be desigred and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water Listrict (CCWD), Foothill Fire Dis *.,•ict and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. _Z6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies invclved. Approval of the final mai will be subject to any requirements that may be roceived from them. M. General Requirements and Approvals J #-*' 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Calt:ans for: B. County Dust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading permit) S. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: C � _ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. _ -� ?. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. �:. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. If w� LJ 1.1 1 E y C, a CITY OF RANCI -10 C'UCAMONGA SUX-1 F RE PORT DATE: January 28, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: •�i GROUP - A total residential development for the development of TUT-Condominiums on 7.3 acres of land compri_ed of 2 lots within the R -1 -8,500 zone (R -3 pending) located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermosa - APN 202 -17 -010 ABSTRACT: This project was continued for review by the Planning Commission at its meeting of December 10, 1980. The detailed Staff Report which was reviewed by the Planning Commission at that meeting 'is attached for your review and further consideration. As the Commission will recall, concerns were expressed among the Commission that the scale of buildings along 19th Street may be too great fur the type of character an? atmosphere which is being encouraged for the 19th Street corridor. Therefore, the Planning Commission continued review of the item to allow the Design Review Committee to re- examine the scale of the buildings and bring back recommendations on possible changes to the Planning Commission for their consideration. The Design Review Committee met with theapplicant and have made revisions to The project, which are now before the Commission for final review end consider- ation. If the Commission concurs with the changes recommended by the Design Re�,iew Committee and with the findings and conditions provided in the at- tached Resolution, then adoption of that Resolution would be appropriate. ANALYSIS: Following you will find two exhibits showing views from 19th Street, Hermosa Avenue, and the intersection of 19th and Hermosa. The Design Review Committee requested that the architect do the following items: 1. Reduce the scale of the two type "A" buildings along 19th Street adjacent to the west property line. 2. Reverse building types "C" and "F" at the intersection and provide as much setback as possible. The two type "A" buildings located along 19th Street at the west property line have been revised to eliminate the unit above the garages facing 19th Street. This creates a one -story look which stair steps back into the second story. In addition to this change, the architect altered the site plan to provide a greater setback to the type "A" buildings and provide a wider landscaped area between the buildings and 19th Street. The landscaped area was increased approximately 10 -12 feet in width. This site plan ad- justment also permitted the inclusion of he existing live Oak tree north of the building A's to be incorporated into the landscape planter adjacent to the type "B" building along the west property line. ITEM B TT 11625 The architect, at "C" and "F" at the other buildings al angles along the s architect has also mounding to help p frontages. -2- January 28, 1981 the suggestion of the Committee, switched building types intersection of Hermo °a and 19th Street and adjusted the ong Hermosa Avenue to provide more setbacks and variety of tree% frontage. In the attached elevation drawings, the shown how the alluvial rock walls can be utilized with rovide additional screening and character to those street CORRESPONDENCE: As the Commission will recall, several property owners on the south side of 19th Street spoke at the meeting with various concerns regarding this development. Staff has sent the people, who signed tha speaking register, a letter indicating to them that the Planning Commission would be considering this project at the January 28, 1981 meeting. To date, we have received no further correspondence from these homeowners on this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive all public comments. If, after said hearing, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions recommended by Staff, then the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions would be appropriate. Res mectful I ann BKH:MV:cd Attachment: tted, 12 -10 -80 Planning Commission Staff Report �J y • 1., �; r o is r 1 t rly d � T -�.i<`:r� � is •, 1 yi q� y �=1 �, uy ♦ l� "p' O . M z J. • t '. 1!'11 11 I1, +II dl II II n f n Date To: From: CI'T'Y OF RANCI-10 CbJCAMONGA December 10, 1480 Planning Commission Barry K. Hogan, City Planner By: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner Related Item: Zone Change No. 80 -14 Subject: ENVi ^ (INMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 116Z5 - ROBERTS GROUP - A total residential development for the development of 101 condominiums on 7.3 acres of land comprised of 1 lot within the R -1 -8,500 zone (R -3 pending) located on the north- west corner of 19th and Hermosa - APN 202 -17 -010 BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval of a total residential development consisting of a one lot subdivision on 7.3 acres of land to be developed with 101 condominium units. The project site is located on the northwest corner of 15th and Hermosa (Exhibit "A "). The project site is presently zoned R -12-8500 and the request for a change of zone to R -3 is being processed concurrently with the request for the develop- ment of the property. The Zone Change request is fully described in the pre - ceeding Staff Report. The project site is presently vacant and contains several mature trees throughout the site in addition to a San Bernardino County Flood Control channel transversing the northeast corner of the site. The Interim General Plan designates this area as :nixed use and the proposed General Plan designates the area for medium residential at 5 to 14 units per acre. The project has been reviewed by the Growth Management and Design Review Com- mittees in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance and has exceeded the threshold point limit, therefore eligibie for consideration of approval by the Planning Commission. ANALYSIS: The Tentative Map is prepared in accordance with the State Subdi- vision Map Act and the City Subdivision Ordinance. The development is being proposed in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance development standards and is in conformance with the Interim and Proposed General Plans. The project is being developed as ownership housing with attached enclosed garages, recrea- tion facilities, common circulation areas, and common open space areas. The project is providing all required minimum setbacks for both street frontages and the side and rear property lines. Environmental Assessme ... and Tentative Tract 11625 �- Page 2 Access to the project will be provided by two driveways from 19th Street. No access - -iil be permitted from Hermosa Avenue. The interior circulation syste,n is simply comprised of two connecting vehicle circulation loops to provide the most efficient access to each of the units. Each unit is being provided with an attached two -car garage; a minimum of twenty visitor p- .rking spaces are being provided throughout the site. The development of this project will require the improvement of 19th Street and Hermosa. Her- mosa will be designed and improved as a major water carrying street. In addition, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District has requested additional right -of -way for the existing Alta Loma Channel which transverses the northeast corner of the site, plus the installation of a new rectangular concrete channrA for this portion of the channel. The conceptual landscape plan indicates that ample landscaping will be pro- vided throughout the site with concentration on the street frontages, around individual units, and the recreation area. The recreation facilities provided vithin this project include a pool and tennis court. In addition a portion of the open space area is being devoted to a water element which flows between several units and down to the pool area. The project will be required to meet the 50 tree per acre City standard. It is recommended that substantial landscaping, mounding and meandering sidewalks be provided along street fron- tages. Also, it is recommended that dense landscaping to provided along 19th Street in front of the two units which have garages facing 19th Street. The site does contain several mature trees; Eucalyptus, Peppers, Live Oaks, and a Palm. It is recommended that these trees be retained wherever possible. It appears that the majority of the Eucalyptus trees fall within proposed building pads. However, the Oak trees do not fall within building pads and appear that they can be saved. Since these trees are as old as 90 years and provide a mature natural resource, it is recommended that the Oak trees be retained and that precise plans on the saving of these trees be submitted to Staff prior to recordation of the map. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the architectural design of the struc- ture and has found them to be acceptable and has recommended approval of the design. The structures are being composed of several different types of materials such as stucco, exterior lap siding, exterior wood siding, wood railings, and cedar shingles. Colored renderings of the design of the building will be available for your review at the Planning Commission meeting. At the time the church to the west of the subject property was reviewed by the Planning Commission, residents to the south felt that the project would obstruct their views. It was determined that the church would not obstruct their view. This project will also not obstruct their view. The applicant has prepared an expanded Initial Study, which is enclosed in your packet for your review. Sta Ff has reviewed said Initial Study and has found that if the conditions recommended are adopted with the project, that any significant impact will be mitigated to an acceptable level. This includes the saving of the trees, installation of street improvements, improvements to drainage facilities and proper grading and site development. Ell 11 Environmental Assess., , and Tentative Tract 11625 �. Page 3 r; CORRESPONDENCE: The Tentative Tract Map was advertised as a public hearing in a Dail Report newspaper. To date, no correspondence for or against the project has been received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive public input on this project. If, after such hearing, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval recommended, then the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions would be appropriate. d, B.-':MV:nm Ittachments: Exhibit "A ", Exhibit "B ", Exhibit "C ", Exhibit "D ", Exhibits "E" Exhibit "H" Resolution o Location Map Tract Map Landscape Plan Phasing Plan - "G" - Zuilding Elevations - Street Sections f Approval T'ftlqulfl�r}Mii[1 %nh MMlhiln1Ag111 R�•In wl1�R� 9'kM-- " ��rrsr�vyii»iil ya►nj�� „, Ink E C'J I, a a ac� anv vsowH3H $a 2 l I N I Imp �lI I G ! I I 'anv vnlOWVtl s .a i V ac J asaldewrrJ a z Fn j 34iIHSNmB ��-- r r i 99 �w c =---' ICIFAOOWB GAY _ 'war .:..%,o,��.�..�... � "'.���+-- •��'�'•� �•.�a: 7+�,� 4,eai.r ,war �.n..J .a.wis .'�•.r.r. lol- ti r�N c � i 4 V � u 4 3.a Z It 1 ' ANA� .� e� ..� \4 � lla� _. tee. -��r.• +. r�_�Jf 1E'l �w+o...rars.rr 4,eai.r ,war �.n..J .a.wis .'�•.r.r. lol- ti r�N c � i 4 V � u 4 3.a Z It 1 ' ANA� .� e� ..� \4 � lla� _. tee. -��r.• +. r�_�Jf 1E'l ri Acr M __d 0 a f a7 / D � I" Ea ri Acr M __d 0 E 11 u fi dflOkO SM A4 gKi TJI -r )K)OdEMD(-, law r Mw mi I is. 3A%1 VSOV483H a. - Poll?. (o w nom.. rn Vri 00 &No CV CNI CV) '3AV VSOWL8314 cn CV Cl) 4F ------- - tr) En ui w CL C13 m cu M M CL CL CL CV CD ca on I, I gig'. -1 ILI I, I gig'. 1 I /�M4 {I + i>��MI1i�L�bltl��s'dS1n�1�R, .� ��`�I� If�i�� �.� _.._ �. a '1 ®���. i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11625. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11625, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Roberts Group, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential development located on the northwest corner of 19th Street and Hermose Avenue, consisting of 101 condominium dwelling units on 7.3 acres consisting of two (2) lots, and; WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subj-,�t to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions r•-norts; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other eviden,e presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: Section 1. The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Traci- No. 11625 and the Map thereof: The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife Gr their habitat; The tentative tract is not 1i'ely to cause health problems; The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. Page 2 L (g) This project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. Section 2. Tentative Tract Map No. 11625, a zooy of which is attached hereto, hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. In conjunction with the development of Phase I, all street landscaping and mounding shall be completed. 2. The use of any garden walls zlong the street landscaping shall incorporate alieuvial rock. 3. Interior landscape planters in front of garages shall be planted with trees. 4. Curvilinear sidewalks shall be provided along 19th Street. 5. The project shall be designed to retain Live Oak tree near the west pv- .)perty line and the live Oaks at the northeast corner of i.i46 site. A detailed tree plan shall be submitted which will indicate how such trees will be retained. Engineering Division 6. The street improvement plans for 19th Street shall be designed and constructed to meet any requirements of Caltrans. The plans .hall be approved by Caltrans prior to recordation of the map. 7. Design and installation of improved channel facility for Alta soma Channel from the northerly tract boundary to Hermosa Avenue shall be required per San Bernardino County Flood Control District's Standards. All on -site and off -site required right -of -way shall be dedicated in fee to Flood Control District. The construction cost of the channel s %zl ' be credited to the storm drain tee, and a reimbursement agreement will be executed per section 8 of City Ordinance No. 75 to cover contributions which exceed the amount of these fees. 8. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface dr ,,inage entering the property from adjacent areas on nortn and northwest. 9. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quit cla -,med or delineated, as per City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. is El r; LJ Resolution No. Page 3 10. Concentrated drainage flow shall not cross sidewalk. Under sidewalk drain shat, be installed to City standards. 11. At the time of underground utility installation and prior to installation of street improvemen.:s, the developer shall contact the appropriate cable television company for the area and make arrangements which would give the company the opportunity to install cable at the time of trenching. If the cable television company does not install cable, then the developer shall install conduit and pull boxes thrr-jhout the tract. Such details shall be shown and verified on the improvement plans. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST- Secretary of the Planning Co ssion I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereky certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular mee :ing of the Planning Commission held on the f th day of January, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYE'.:. COMMISSIONERS: Nn�S: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject:TE-NTATtVf� TRACT �eiP35 Applicant: Location: Those items checked are conditions of approval. 0 APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR CCMPLIANCE WITH THF. FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 11 11 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. _ 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sic:eyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5. Mail box.ts, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by Lhe developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "nazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties ind streets as required by the Pia,ising and Building Divisiors. —'z10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. _Z11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. 14o lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. —162. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. 13. l'exturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. �14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all r•ecepticais kept out of public view from private and public streets. -Z 1S. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Eui Ving Official prior to occupancy cf the fir.-,t unit. --Y—/16. All bci - dings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. --Il—/17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices sL --h as window locks shall be installed on each unit. 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limite,i to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless. appliances, etc. 21. This development sha7i provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. _ 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection Distri:t. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance With the Equestrian Trail Flan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, mamimum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. 24. This tract shall form r° annex to a maintenance di.stri.ct for maintenance of equestrian. trails. I 11 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rakes., rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. B. • Parkinq and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' anu shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. _Z2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. t, 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automatic gat-age door openers. _Z7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on _Z this site unless they are the principle source of „ransportation for the owner. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other _Z9. than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Fxisting trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plar of existing tries shawiny their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shalt take into account the proposad grading and shall be required tG be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final gradir^ plan. KI r. �3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. ,_.. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. _Z5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70 9-15 gallon, and 10%. -5 gallon. _Z6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. _Z7. All slope banks in access of five (5) Feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited -to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and cccupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be f0ly maintained by a hc^ieowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. _ 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, -nall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in t'ie required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Flannirg Division. _ 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial re:.k, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along 11.1 11 D. Signs _Z1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. _ 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. 3. The signs indicated on the submittea plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sigit review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance nf a Building Permit. 2 Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No.AkI ZE_ is granted subject to the approval of ?one Change 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete condiTons or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on I have read Ft he & R._ 'es and understan t a sal of is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all a-fected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development %,hich states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (50) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. �;. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of bui`-Jing pernits wh_n no map is invclved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer- and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Depar`-nent of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- ficati3r of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. _Z8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. -9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of t.s Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code_, National Electric Code, and •.11 other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. _Z2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. _Z3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but rot be limited to: Cit; Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. 4. Orior to the issuance of a b?iildina permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. S. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. __Z 6. Striet names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. % JM _ 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. 8. All corner dwellings shall have the buildinc elevation facing the street upgrade with adaitional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures _ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of exizting buildings. 2. Existing bu 'ding(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the builoing shall be demolished. _ 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Grading __ZI. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City G -tiding Standards and accepted grading practices. final grading plan shall be in substantial con'ormance with the approved conceptual grading plan. __Z2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the Stace of CJ ifornia to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planing, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision m..p or issuance of building permit whiche� -�r comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERI14S DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interi3r street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on Ner{1?✓sa t;��i?hu2 / additional feet on� t9h"' /9�� r fhC ih !C with HerMOs? Aug Icer AMP. _Z3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standa.-ds. __VZ 4. A11 rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall b i:ated as follows: �idre. Dyl1z1L7.I�[/ * sude F —%5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring ccgsss to all parcels over private roads, drives, .,r parking areas, - - 56'�/�i Pe twordedf !;yd Tvlf' o. _ 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of good.; to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Improvements _ 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees ane street lights on all interior streets. 2. Construct th,! following missing improvements including, but not limited to: CURB & STREET NAME GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER it r2; S . ✓ v� p/ � d � _✓ 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. _ ,/'4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all stre t� �i��ggr�ovem nts, %rprior to i ssuance of an enc,rroa �.I �%ent permi t. fiat/ p11a5 on�Q�"olugow e►mw�/A' ,1 to.4ny4,nslr iy r�ji1 i'kc, X W KtoarF/ Qf{e�t carr ruckAj- _ / 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer dnd the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the mep or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. y/' 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be inste.11 per the requirements of the City Engineer. 0 K. Drainage and Flood Control ✓ 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. 'Hite m si eo4e 5. tha- #aalew g- �o�t�•th —sin —s shall be designed as major water carrying streEts requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approacries, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities r� 7. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. 2. Utility easements shall be: provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. ✓ 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Coiapany and City standards. ✓ 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. _moo. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be rF,:_ived frcm them. M. General Requirements and Approvals 11 1. Permit< from other agencies will be required as follows: ,/A. B. C. Q. Caltrans for: County Dust. Fib San Bernardino Other: tement required prior to issuance of a gracing permit) County Floou Control District _ ✓_ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, i•ubject to tine approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. _ 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer,. J/ 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. 13 11 J F] D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MENICRANDUM DATE: January 2a, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry V. Hogan, City plan er BY: Mi0aei Vairin, Senior Plenner ��O CVCAM 74,9 � ' k- ' 1f IZ 1_z 1z 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL 'SSESSMCNT 1,ND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11460 - LEWIS - A request fo,, con, o 72 existira apartments int co ondominiums, locate on a 12 acre site on the Borth side of 19th Street, east of Carnelian (Sunscape I). Following the advertisement of this i :em in the newspaper as a public hearing item, it was discovered '.hat recent amendments, effective Jaruary 1, 1981, to the State Sublivi:A on Map Act have been made to condo - conversion criteria. Tho am! „drents are relative to the noti- fication procedures of tenants and prr.perty owners. We, therefore, are requesting continuance of this item to allow the appropriate time to explore which of the new arendments may be applicable to the pro- cessing of this project. Staff is pre;ently preparing a detailed memorandum to the City Attorney for hi: opinions on the newest amend- ments to th State Subdivision Map Art. We have discussed this with thc: app! icints and they understand our need for continuance on this project tc ailc•w for proper notification processing. Therefore, we request and recommend that this project be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 25, 1981. Respactful:y submytted, CityVlanner V BKH:MV:jr Ii ITEM C 11 L U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: January 28, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENV IRGC`:1ENTA1_ ASSESSM "1T AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO 11369 - -••• 4 - ,. 4,r -acc suoaivision OT bb lots on 15.8 acres wit+lin the R- 1••8,500 zone located on the east side of Carnelian north of 19th Street - APN 202 -221 -042. This item was advertised as a public hearing for this Planning Commission meeting on the basis that the project design and revisions could be ap- propriately resolved pr-;or to the meeting. Design considerations and grading considerations, which need to be clarified and resolved with the applicant, have not been able to be solved by the time of this review. We have notified the applicant of this and will bring back the project to the Commission when ready. We do not know how long it will take the ap- plicant to make appropriate adjustments in the project. Therefore, re- advertisement of this item for a future meeting will occur. Resppctfi i lys ubmitted, City P1 BKH:MV:;;- ITEM D rr ITEM E ©TY OF RANCI -10 CUCAM , ' A G,1CAMOVt �o STAFF REPORT ; FDATE.:January Q } 28, 1981 Q TO: Planning Commission 1977 FROM: Barry K. Hagan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTRTIVE TRACT N0. 11581 - CARNELIAN INVESTMENTS: A custom lot sub ivision of 4p single family lots on 10.8 acres in the R- 1- 8,500 -T zone generally located on the southwest corner of Carnelian and Highland - APN 201 - 214 -05 ABSTRACT: of -way. It This tract falls within the proposed Foothill Freeway right - has been division policy reviewed, rated and revised in accordance with sub- and is ready for Commission action. However, we are recommending continuance for action on this project to the February 25, 1981 meeting ject and in order to allow a chance for Caltrans to review this pro- come of -way area. to an agreement relative to protecting the Freeway right - We to this have discussed this with the applicant and he has agreed continuance to the February meeting. Staff hopes to be able to ;Work out an appropriate agreement between the State and the property owner on the development of this property. Respectfully su mitted, AR K: HOG Cit Planner BKH:MV:cd ITEM E D CITY Or RAN U io M AMO'GA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 28, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Mogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NU. IUZ // - BAKMAMAN - A custom lot subdivision consisting of 30 lots on 24.36 acres of land is the A -1 -5 zone located on the north side of Almond Road east of Carnelian Street - APN 1061- 171 -02 Related Project: Zone Change No. 80 -12 ABSTRACT: The review of this Tentative Tract Map requires concurrent review of the Zone Change request. The Zone Change request requires publication in the local newspaper at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. The notice was not printed in i.he paper, and therefore a hearing on the Zone Change cannot occur. Therefore, it is recommended that review on Tentative Tract No. 10277 be continued to the February 25, 1981 meeting, at which time the Zone Change will be properly advertised and can be reviewed concurrently with the review of the tract. Respectfully submitt d, ARRY HOGAN City anner BKH:MV:cd G ITEM F u QTY OF RANG -1fO CUCAMONUN STAFF BLEpOPX DATE: January 28, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 6636 - Stevens, Trustee A subdivision of 6.09 acres in 2 parcels for Industrial located on the west side of Heilman, south of 9th Street. 1977 INTRODUCTION: This subdivision will provide -two parcels of Industrial land of about 3 acres each. Parcel 1 is proposed for immediate development under Director Review on this evening's agenda. This parcel map is being submitted inorder to permit the development of the Hellman Ave. frontage without the necessity of dedication and improvement of the extension of Lion St. It is anticipated that this extension will be needed for future circulation in the area as shown on the attached area map. If a large project to the south of this tentative map should change the desired circulation pattern, then it is possible that Lion St. could.be ended in a cul -de -sac. Since future needs are in such doubt, it is felt that potential buyers of Parcel 2 should be put on notice that a street extension is likely upon further subdivision or development. This could best be accomplished by an offer of dedication. Drainage for this property will be provided per Engineering Conditions for the tentative map and the Director Review and by existing easements. The property is bounded on the north by four parcels, three of which are developed, and on the south,east and west by vacant land. The entire area is zoned and planned for industrial use. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of t e Initia, Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no signWicant adverse impacts on the envi- ronment as a result of the proposed subdivision. RECOII14ENDATION: It is recommended that the tentative map be approved, subject to the City Engineer's Report, and that a K3gative Declaration be issued. A resolution is attached to provide for approval should the Commission concur. Respectfully submitted,, — LSH. PAtbf. j a Attachments ITEM G CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Richard P. Stevens. Trustee TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6636 LOCATION: W/S of Hallman. S/D 9th St. _ DATE FILED: 12/10/80 14UMBER OF LOTS: 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: portion of Lot 7 as per map RECEIPT NUMBER: 09598 of Subdivision of Lot 10. Cucamonga Vineyard FEE: $250.00 Tract as recorded in Book 20 Page 44. ZONE: M -R Industrial * * * * * * * *� * * * * ** *� * ** • < * *� * *� * * * ** *sir. * *,r�r *� * ** TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: George MimMack GROSS ACREAGE: 6.09 ADDRESS: 214 South Euclid Ave. MINIMUM LOT AREA: Ontario, CA 91761 MINITIUM LOT FRONTAGE: ORECCRD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE k ®® Richard P. Stevens. Trustee 15202 Downey Ave. _ 2131634 -3330 Pay-mount, CA REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications X 1. Dedicatior by final map of all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet or additional feet on additional feet on Corner P/L radius required on Other X 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: _ 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: _ 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: r 7. An off edication far Lion St. is required. RCE 2 TENTATIVE MAP NO- 6636 Page 3 RP 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans, for: B. City: C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5 deep: ).E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Map Control _ 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: _ 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. _ 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs clarification as follows: 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. Iftarcel Map Waiver 22. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to El Recording for 1 Z' Building permit -for-.) 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- - ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro - perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. _ 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will oe required t assess 1111pdc� runoff. } RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. .x.3.5 Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior to O Recording for ) RiBuilding permit for Rarcelsl &_2 ) 6°1Ii 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets when such street dedications are accepted upon development. 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: * includina landcranina anti irrinatinn n .o.. STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET TREES STREET LIGHTS MEDIAN ISLAND* OTHER X x_ 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. x 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to be underground. X_ li. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County .Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X_ 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underground service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: _ 17. The 1011owing specific dimensions, i.e., cul-de-sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: 18. The fo oWi ng existing streets are su stan ar They will require: Approvals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of San Bernardino County Flood Control District. _ X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities Gies involved. Approval of the final map will be that may be received from them. RCE 20 approval from CALTRANS/ and other interested agen- subject to any requirements TENTATIVE MAP N0. 6636 Page 4 Miscellaneous 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. _ 36. Noise impact on this !1roject will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. _ 37. This property is not within 'the present City Boundary and will require annexation. _ 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: yr_ 39. Proper grading and erosion control, including the prevenlation of se' dime�ta tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. x 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity, permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. x_ 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(i) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of anv such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the fina map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. x 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street, Multiple lots fronting on d single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X_ 45. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drain- age entering the property from adjacent areas. ACE 20 $4� 41�Istt� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: / i peajeCU _ 1J 1i� O t 1 1U Uld v ' N. o ry 'gvj in o %9 N � . 1— V44 c`. A go � t E vd J N10 . N 0: I ti Ii „ it li jjj n �n 11 1 �C' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6636 WHEREAS, on December 10, 1980, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on January 28, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse enviro ntal impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on Januar;, 28, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 5636 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TIl DAY O:" JANUARY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: — Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January, 1981, by the following vote to wit: 117.1 4A W-1 X11 1 is E� W L U w z QCL Z 12 h V j u h �i` R 2 � V 18 3 V� I I t 1? tl. Y w 11061 5I A �M1 n� a 5 = -. I` • I I Yv. W L U w z QCL Z 12 h V j u h �i` R 2 C M V VZ4 I I t 1? C M ^� VZ4 i a a if Y w 11061 5I W ai �NI f W W Q N 0 d I w r, va Y 4 a k CC E 51 M ^� 1I] .! �y ^,II ?y V� W ai �NI pl i�Cp. I 5 = -. I` • I I Yv. 11 ! y ! 1 C 1 .? 1 F Ip I w r, va Y 4 a k CC E 51 M ^� 1I] .! �y a W ?y V� W ai �NI I w r, va Y 4 a k CC E 51 1I] .! M w V� W ai �NI pl i�Cp. I • A }L. I 1$InM I Yv. 11 ! y ! 1 C 1 .? F YY I w r, va Y 4 a k CC E 51 1I] .! M w V� W ai �NI pl i�Cp. I • A }L. I 1$InM I Yv. 11 I w r, va Y 4 a k CC E 51 1v 1I] .! M w • A }L. I 1$InM 11 ! y ! 1 C 1 .? 1v Ll n L�J f (. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form mu:. t be completed and submitted. to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental. impact and a plegative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: HELLMAN INDUSTRIAL RENTALS A7PPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: INTEGRATED INC. (J.P. Darling), 15702 Downey Avenue, Paramount, Ca. 90723 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PRCJECT: 213-;34-3330, J P Darling. 15202 Downey Avenue, Paramount, Ca. 90723 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL 140.) 8782 Hellman Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga (Parcel Map No. 1802) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL,' STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Building Permits 1 -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Construction of 4- multitenant. industrial buildings of non - combustible, energy efficient construction, maximum tenant amount will be 20 units. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 6.77 acres, 294,901 sq. ft., no proposed buildings. E DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORV14TION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, L'SE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The environmental setting of the proiect is vacant land surrounded by industrial buildings on three sides of varying -use. a general topography of t o project-as not unusual or significant in measure to warrant major changes in the land surface. The project property supports no significant plant trees, or animals except that which is associated with raw. undeveloped property. There exss•s no nownfi"sforica arc eo ogica., cultural or scenic aspects of the project. There exists no manmade structures on the project site. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series - of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No, full development of the total site will result in nc, s!3"..1cant impact on the surrounding environment or require municipal. x -2 IM • WILL 'THIS PROJECT: Ob YES NO _ X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? �i X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! _ X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? now many? -0- _ _X_ 6. Create the reed for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above:• IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATI0IQ: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be s bmitted before an adequate evaulation can be r hde by tl e 4 Development Review Committee. Date September 2.2 1980 __ Signatur _ J,P. DARLING Title VICE - PRESIDENT %3 D c.n rv10 CITY OF RANU10 CUCAk, CONGA � N C of -� DATE: January 28, 1981 TO: Plane -ng Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT AND PARCEL MAP 6611 - Daon Corporation a tree 3 parcel Comnr_rcia ndustria subdivision of 17.65 acres located on the northwest corner of Haten and Arrow. INTRODUCTION: This subdivision consists of Parcel 24 of recorded Parcel Map 6206. 71'5e subdivision, as proposed, provides for thr ?e parcels for commercial and industrial use. It is intended by the applicant that a K -Mart store be constructed on Parcel 1, subject to further approval by the Commission. Parcels 2 and 3 will be used for future accessory commercial development. Daon Corporation has. bot.ded for all off -site improven'entsunder Parcel Map 6206. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: An environmental impact repot has been certified by t e P anning Commission on April 23, 1980 for enti•e project (Parcel Map 6206). RETMENDATION: It is recommended that the tentative map be approved, subject to t e City Engineer's Report. A Resolution is'attached to provide for approv- al should the Commission concur. Respectfully submitted, LBH:BK:jaa Attachments ITEM H I RESOLUTION NO. • A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6617 WHEREAS, on December 31, 1980, a formal application was submitted .equesting review of the above described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on January 28, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental • damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on January 28, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 6617 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY - Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission i I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January, 1981, by the following vote to wit: 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAI-10DIGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY:- Daon Corporation LOCATION• NEC Haver. and Arrow TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6617 DATE FILED: X2/31/80 NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 LEGAL DESC ^IPTION:subdivision of ParcQL24. Parcel RECEIPT NUMBER: 09522 . • 6206- as rpr• • • in 8pok 59, PageS • $250.00 ZONE: M -2 TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: L. D. King. Inc. GROSS ACREAGE: 17.65 ADDRESS: c..17 N- Furlid Ave. _ MINIMUM LOT AREA: Ontario CA 91762 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE i Dann Corporation ___ 4041 MacArthur Blvd 714/988 -5492 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on _ Corner P/L radius required on Other X 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows:jjer Planning Commission Resolution 73 -20 and Parcel Map 6206 _ 4. Street vacation required fcr: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: o. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6617 Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior to 0 Recording for 13 Building permit for all parcels ) _ 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. x S. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: *including landscaoinq and irrigation on meter STREET DIAME CURB & GUTTER A.G. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET TREES STREET LIGHTS MEDIAN ISLAND* OTHER Haven Ave. X En ire m—edian-�hall-be built, with west half tc be credited to- ect. X 8a. Improvement certificate for construction of median island on Haven shall be shown on mapp 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative X - map, or as required cy the City Engineer. _ 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to be underground. X 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation o. qP any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. _ X _ 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. x 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 15. Street iight locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underqround service. _ 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: _ _ 17. The following specific dimensions, i.e., cul-de-sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: _ 18. The following existing streets ate substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 20. Approvals have nct been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP N0. 6617 Page 3 IduhL x 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans, for: B. City:_ C. County Dust A atement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep: _ E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Map Control 22. If only a portion of this Clap is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- - vide for two -way traffic and parking on al: Affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line in accord- - ante with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The boundary of the Tentative P4ap needs c arificanon as fol lows: 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. Parcel Map Waiver 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for ) 0 Building permit for ) X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. Zone A -0 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- - perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. _ 31. If tiiater surface is above top of curb, 30 walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will a require to assess imp ac o increased ACL runoff. X 34. Applicable portions of the conditions for Parcel Map 6206 shall also apply to this project. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. Page 4 Miscellaneous X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. X 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. _ 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. _ 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: X 39. Proper grading and erosion control, including the preventation of seU menta -' tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. _ 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Uivision. X- 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. X 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. _ 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUbBS CITY ENGINEER BY / ad &/ 1l � t RCE. 20 Cl I i- t EE i{7 D[C3.•. j*! �b: g,a• i _ iri8� 7^ L L! Li 7•tt:� r -r� ^�Y yYy Cy` w wm i f 1 NO/ `off rc. 2e ' �✓i r.��' _mow-- __ -.• \- �y4 C, w 22 1 � R 0 d ,IZk y,N' -y. Y�, a •i d V V A 6 T O f cs ME Q CL •� JY JF � ♦♦n -\ 1 `••YjYj C 4 ►oa Z 4'•• Yo qY •_i jOY ui yM° t O r : =z aoY CS v =f � La s f- `moo t < 4 i f 1 NO/ `off rc. 2e ' �✓i r.��' _mow-- __ -.• \- �y4 C, w 22 1 � R 0 M•• �M Q 22 4 ,I'. ,IZk y,N' -y. � '' � :,mow -\ � � ♦♦n -\ 1 `••YjYj M•• �M Q 22 4 ,I'. }f .'' I� it h � 1� CC �•`S � II I .J� r�tir,�TivF .itiiJq a JlrGw rJI' JKAan .t• / JS, ? ].V., !sr CMn'wrcYno, 31bJy a/ J Co1,nJtJ a( k} V[aN C A � 4 i�r� 1wr a swo (o Sl Nry M 4 wW r nyrr J �] 1 E 0 .rrs 4wr�.14Irr�1� j� _. ......... ....w: •] �wl]p a• r.r: 4L. 144. �,'�.. ''t_.. t ?� -.: "e. l.Ji.. y .j ,� '11{6 •' Q A •A Y~ ..I 3 t '. Mr' 11! 11 1 WAm' Oy Sl Nry M 4 wW r nyrr J �] 1 E 0 "I WI I� 0•! ' iENT �f/E M`IP G�20G B:}nq o ,avrw. ad' l r.w..r. rry,. ,?^, afmcN 440m wv. CA^* .! .r . -Uft w+a, J.av d cV. Iv t r� 5 /• V ]y0. \ \ \ \. \ \ \. \.rye _"' i� \w 1 --- ----. y. llM a� ti I 1 11 y' ad O✓� e, A/I yt- .Y •..r1. rY '..•Y.LYr .ISL N�i tl �.•..^.Va� II tl 1 y � f i TN y. llM a� ti I 1 11 y' ad O✓� e, A/I yt- .Y •..r1. rY '..•Y.LYr r] 11 CITY OF RANaiO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT[ DATE: January 28, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner SUBJECT: DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -03 - construction OT Tour 14) 7nousTrlai Dull sq. ft. on 6.77 acres of land in the M -1 Hellman Avenue - APN 209- 011 -43 Related Item: D.R. 80 -38 - Integrated [h dAYNE BUTLER) - The ings t� ota' ing 49,528 zone, located at 8787 BACKGROUND: As the Planning Commission recalls, on November 12, 1980, Director Review No. 80 -38 was denied. At that time considerable discussion ensued over whether or not Lion Street should be extended through from its terminus to the southerly boundary of this property. There was also some discussion over additional architectural detailing along Hellman frontage to the satisfaction of all; however, the issue of the extension of Lion Street seemed to be a stumbling block. The applicant has submitted a parcel map, which will divide the property and take Lion Street off of the previously considered Director Review No. 80 -38. The applicant would still like to proceed with the development of the property, as presented to the Planning Commission November 12, 1980. Staff has brought this issue before the Planning Commission for reconsider- ation under a new Director Review number. RECOMMENDATION: We would suggest that the P1-anning Commission consider this project for approval subject to the conditions attached with the ad- ditional condition to return the project to the Design Review Committee to work out the architectural detailing along Hellman Avenue. IRes a fully -ubmijted, ARC HOGAN Ci Planner BKH:cd Attachments ITEM I W El — CITY OF RANCI-10 CUCALmOIIGA STAFF REPORT t� DATE: November 12, 1980 �� a T0: Planning Commission X14 1977 7 FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Roger Lasby, Assistant Planner SUBJECT- ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 80 -38 - INTEGRATED - The construction of four industrial buildings totalling 49,528 sq. ft. on 6.77 acres of land in the M -1 zone, located at 8787 Hellman Avenue •• APN 209 - 011 -43 BACKGROUND: Integrated, Inc. is requesting review and approvalfor the development of four light industrial buildings on 6.77 acres located on the west side of Heilman Avenue between 8th Street and 9th Street (Exhibit I'All) . Each of the four proposed buildings has a floor area of 12,382 sq. ft. and could be divided into five tenant spaces. Four future buildings are shown on the plan on the western portion of the site. The subject property is presently zoned M -R, (restricted manufacturing) and general planned for uinimum impact industrial. The project site land to the south, and west are vacant. Two lots north of the site are vacant while the remaining properties north and east of the site are developed with industrial uses. A recent industrial development immediately north of the site includes Lion Street, a dedicated public right -of -way, which stub -ends at the north boundary line of the subject property. ANALYSIS: The project site is adequate in size and shape to accomodate the proposed improvements as shown on the development plan (Exhibit "B "). The Design Review Committee was concerned with the aesthetics of this project. The Committee recommended improvements in the architectural appearance to en- hance the public view from Hellman Avenue. The Development Review Committee requested that Lion Street be continued across the subject prop_rty as a requirement of development to provide access for this project and future pro- jects in the immediate vicinity. The continuation of Lion Street is in accordance with City policies aimed at improving access and circulation in the industrial areas of the City in order to promote orderly development of industrial uses. The applicant has expressed the opinion that the required changes would not improve t:ie project and that the continuation of Lion Street is unwarrented. The applicant has requested that the project be reviewed by the Planning Commission based on the plans submitted with the original application. Since the applicant has decided not to revise the development plans in accordance with the Committee recommendation, Staff has not prepared conditions of approval on this project because these major issues have not been resolved. Therefore, it is being brought before the Commission for its review and direction. Staff Report DR 80 -38 Page 2 The site plans and architectural elevations are attached for your review. The construction system proposed is called "Dryvit ". A sample of this building material will be availaLle at the meeting. Part I of the Initial Study, completed by the applicant, is attached for your review. Staff has completed th% 7nvironmental Checklist and has found that, as proposed, without Vie inclusion of mitigation measures, the project could have adverse impacts i,: the areas of "asethetics ", "land use and planning conisderations ", and "transportation (circulation) ". RECOMMENDATION: If after review of the development plan and issues, the Comm —''ss on finds that the development is not consistent with the goals and policies of the industrial area, will not promote logical development pat- terns or circulation systems, and does not meet the design expectations of the City, then a Resolution of denial would be in order. EKH :RLL:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A ", Location Map Exhibit "8 ", Site Study Exhibit "C ", Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D ", Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "E ", Elevations Initial Study, Part I Resolution 1 u � P".w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISM a =c- ro A" f C" v NORTH ITE,*vI:D1RE -TOR Rel,'IEW AIG. To 3$ TITLE: $lTE• STUDY EXHIBIT: �_ SCALE- 0 E taryir�r ♦ntiaf �r�rin+ { NORTH CITY OF ITEt"vl :P-L TDR REVlacw 1�lO.$O.3$ IZA NI CI-I® CUC'NNT lO NL GA TITLE: - DEMA1L. D S I TE FLI4IV PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT. G sG',LE =_t_ .-- I • 1' f �� � �� �) i ''.. 1 i. . 1, . I .,. 1 ��� ..1 . 1 i. 1 �. 1 I" I .1 �. � .�� , �''. , i � • r i� I • 1' f �� � �� �) i ''.. 1 i. . 1, . I .,. 1 ��� ..1 . 1 i. 1 i A ,4 -1 CIL HUI mug �y TY 014' lTDvl:JQ/RfCT-6R REW6W NO, : • ANCHO r > rzoAJS DIVISION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSIOP! APPROVING DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -03 LOCATED IN THE M -R ZONE AT 8787 HELLMAN AVENUE APN 209 - 011 -43 WHEREAS, on the 9th day of January, 1981, , a complete application was filed for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of January, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the site indicated by the development plan is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, landscaping, loading, and other features required by this section. 2. That the improvements as indicated on the development plan are located in such a manner as to be properly related to existing and proposed streets and highways. 3. That the improvements as shown on the development plan are consistent with all adopted standards and policies as set forth in this section;. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the env"— iron ment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 28, 1981. SECTION 3: That Director Review No. 81 -03 is approved subject to the foi owing conditions and attached stana.ird conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Revised building elevations addressing the Commission's concerns, shall be submitted to and approved by the Design Review Committee, prior to the issuance of building permits for this project. 2. Emergency /Fire access to the site shall be provided from Lion Street in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. Emergency /Fire access shall not be permitted from Hellman Avenue. Resolution No. Page 2 3. A reciprocal access easement for a 30` driveway along,the south property line, shall be obtained from the south property and recorded prior to Issuance of building permits. Proof of such easement shall be filed with the Planning Division. 4. Additional trash enclosures are needed throughout the development. A revised site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division, indicating these rations, prior to issuance of bu;'.ing permits. J5. /Minimum 4.'x4' tree wells shall be provided on 20' centers / along the entire north property line of this project. i The trees shall be a minimum of 15- gallon in size and shall be provided with an irrigation system. Such details shall be shown on the detailed landscape plan. ENGINEERING DIVISIOf_. -- I. An easement for emergency access shall be provided for Jeae' Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 6636 connecting to Lion Street. / 2. All drainage from this project shall be conveyed to i� k streets or drainage easements, or accepted by letter by adjacent property owners. 3. All Engineering Division conditions of approval per- - taining to Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No. 6636 shall apply to this project. 4. Tentative Parcel Map No. 6636 shall be approved and recorded prior to issuance of building permits for this project. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, chairman E vA 1 I I�1 i gyU y i Resolution No. Page 3 I, JACK LA14, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by 'she Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject:_ ry'RacTot- k>E ytF W Nd. Applicant: MT-i CG2ft7-F-.0 INC-. Location: g iF! % !YELL -MffAl !tVCNUE —full) 2-04- 011-1-3 Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE 141TH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development X 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. X 2. Revised site plans znd building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. X 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. _ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. X 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. x g. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. X 1.0. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall ind;cate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. _ 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. _ 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. _ 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. .16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. —17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. _ 18. Security devices suchas window locks shall be installed on each unit. _19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. _ 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of -insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. .21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. _ 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. .24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates., rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. B. Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. X_ 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. _ 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. _ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other —` than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted tc and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. _ 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. -- _ 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentialiy dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. 4. street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the (Waster Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70 % -15 gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon. E. Ali landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. _ 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. in the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. _ 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. -9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. _- 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. -11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. _ 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along E D. Si ns _ 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall b,! designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, and shall require review and approval by the Planning Divisior prior to installation of such signs. X 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. _ 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved w•th this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. _ 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. _ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance /Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete con itions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on ; I have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty 160) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval ir the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other " residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. 8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. _ 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development 0 L 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. X 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. _ 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) o:- major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. _ 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code .`or property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. _ 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H_ Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of b74ilding permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: is additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 3. Corner property lino radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehic;lar ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: _ 5. Reciorocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. _ 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of a:.,, trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Improvements I. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER I _ 3. Prior to aoy work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. _.4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. _ 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. 6. 7 All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installe per the requirements of the City Engineer. I N� K. Drainage and Flood Control _ 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: _ 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. _ 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. _ 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combinationvf special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving Utility companies and the CitLy Engineer. _ 3. Developer shall be responsible for Lhe relocation of existing public utilities, as required. 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet -- requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any - requirements that may be received from them. N. General Requirements and Approvals _ 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: B. County Dust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading permit) C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. _ 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. 11 E CITY OF RANCI -10 CUCAMONGA SIAFF REPORT DATE: January 28, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistai:t Pianner y. o } F 5', U SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE DETERMIk.ATION NO. 80 -01 - SNAPP - A self -serve car wash within the C -1 zoi:e. BACKGROUND: Recently, an application was filed (Conditional Use Permit No. 8_-02 for the development of a retail center on the northwest corner of Arrow and Turner in the C -1 zone, a part of which is a self- sei,ve car wast. The car wash has been designeJ to integrate fully with the proposed neigtbor- hood shopping center (see exhibits). The applicant is proposing the car sash as a service to the residents of the 644 existing apartments surrounding the proposed site. ANALYSIS: The San Bernardino County Zoning Ordinance, which has been ad)pted for interim use by the City, does not specifically list a car wash as a pe -mit- ted use in the C -1 zone. However, the Ordinance gives the authority to th! Planning Commission to approve any other uses within the C -1 zone that may be similar to those listed in the district. A copy of the C -1 zone regulatio.1s are attached for your review. The Ordinance does permit car washing in con- junction with an automobile service station provided that the operation is conducted wholly within the building. The Commission may be aware that pre- sently there is a self -serve car wash i-cated in an existing neighborhood shopping center, the Sunrise Center located on the southwest corner of Base Line and Carnelian. This car wash has been loc-.ced there for several years and to date does not appear to have caused any significant problem. The use of coin operated car washes on a site is critical in determining sire plan design and land use compatibility. It -ay be possible to design such a use to be compatible to the neighberhood center and adjacent land uses. However, if the Commission decides that a coin operated car .gash is similar in nature to other uses in the C -1 zone, then it is recommended that such a use in the C -1 zone would be subject to a Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Coomission consider all aspects of this request. If the Commission finds that a coin operat,d car wash may be allowed in the C -1 zone, subject to the approval of a C.U.P., then Adontion of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. tfulh;tA- Smitted, ty "Planner ITEM J J,a 6uIdd®ys t'• fill .pe o k c9g � R $ g cc 4 y s }� c u 3 3 A dtaa Ig t� z� R u Y i W oA v1 el 0 L I ^� l i� �I I' �I I II �I I i a rFLnJ V / z ul ul !R a Ul U Z O u gyp. 103 lei 9� jolueo Bwddo;q] rL, ;R)i !;e b :3 t, Lot a� IU CgE •lyp Iasi I )E)4-F-.g I N Cl Zr�_'214e v s a P,1L,r, 0 F11 Lt-. 61.027.1 LA.ND USE AND BUILDING RMUL.ATIONS 61.027A C -1 District. The primary purpose and application of tai, District shall be for small limited shopping ccnlers. dammed and designers ill cooperalion with the county Planning Conunissiun lu meet neighborhood shopping needs. The following regulations shalt apply ill C -1. Neighborhood Business Districts: (a) GENERAL USES PERMITTED: (1) Residential: (A) Any use Permitted in the R -1. R -'_. R -3- and AP Districts providing such urxs shall he governed by the regulations applying io them in the district in which they are first listed as permitted uses. (B) Motel. (b) BUSiNLSS USES PERMITITD: (1) Retail Stores: (A) Bakery (B) Book or static. cry store (C) :'unfcctioncry store (D) Drug Story (E) Dry goods or notions store (F) Florist or gilt shop (C;) Grocery. fruit or vegetable store M) liardware or electrical appliance store w (1) Jewelry store 16 t1) Meal market or delicatessen store (2) Office or Ground Space: (A) Anit,mOWIC parking lot (B) Of Picts. business or professional (3) Services: ( A) Automobile service station. provided thatany major iirc repairing. battery charging and storage of merchandise and sup, des. lub icaiion and washing are conducted wholly within a, building. See specific setback retluirentetits in Section b h .0:7A(I). (Am. Ord, W3. -':2W()8) (13) Bank ((') Barber shop and beauty parlor ID) cafe or restaurant (cxcluding dancing or eetertainnemt) ( ti) ( Reserved) (F) (lothes cicaniw; agency unWor pressing establishutent IGI Club or lodge (nonprofit). fraternal or religious association (11) Conmitmily center (I) Dressmaker or millinery shop (1) clinic medical. dental. chiropractic Or chiropodist (1:) Laundry agency Il.) Library (M) I'hotucr:g,hcr lusras! 364-_' C C ZONING CODE • C 1 Ili41 irt I\ 1 llo%l 01'(,,:.. 61.1127A E 101 Shoe store and repair . t).'o Irlor - (4) (.Other useN stniilar to the abotc if approve) by the County Planning Commir.Nivtt. (S) The following nses shall be pennitteJ, if the fixation and development plan is approved as provided in Section 6i .o2: J( f). (Ai Mobile 7avings and Loan. uv Batik Facility, including docking structure. (I) This use is permitted only.in the mountain area as dexined in Section (,1.021')1 k)( I HE). t I1) The appii,•ant shall submit with his application for location and development approval. •- vidence of current approvai of the Federal Flume Loan Batik Board. the Calitilrnia Savings and Loan ('ommissioner. and ativ other regulatory agency whose approval is otherwise required for a banking enterprise. ;cl CONDITION' OF USES: 0) All strra. shops or businesses shall be operated wholly within an enclosed building. i_21 All product,; produced, whelhor primary -or incidental, shall be sold at retail on cite premises and no more than two (2) persons shall be engaged in tell production or in the see icing SIGNS. of :nati'riafs. (3 (A) Any exterior sigh display shall pertain only to a use conducted within the building and shall be attached flat against a Wall of the building. parallel with its horizontal dimensions, and shalt not project above the roof line except that in a neighborhood shopping center, one (1) freestanding sign shall be ,permitted to identify the shopping center and business(es) within it. The 10131 square footage of any such freestanding sign shall not exceed one hundred and sixty (160) square feel including the individual store directory pail -Is. No copy space of any single, notice shall exceed one hundred 000) square feet. Any such freestanding sign shall be mounted in a landscaped planter at least two hundred (2200) square feat in area, which shall contain a permanent irrigation. system. Any such freestanding sign shall be designed and located so as not to obstruct sight distance on site. and s0 as not to obstruct the view of motorists critering or departing from tin shopping center. (B) Fisher one (1) monument sign or one (1) on -site freestanding identification sign may be permitted, in addition to the attached sign specifications in Section 61.037A(c)(3)(A). All signs shall be designed and located so as not to obstnict sight distance on site. a•nd so as not to obstruct the view of Iotorists. (1) Une (I) on -site, double - face monument identification sign for nonresidential Uses. when approved by the PlanllitI ' 3643 lsan•yel In 61.027A LAND US@ AND BILI.DING REGULATIONS Dirc:lor and found that the att..ihvd to the 1: C ZONING CODE - C -1 District 61.027A (j) REAR YARD I(LQUIRED: There shall be a rear yard of not less than twenty - five percent 1251 ;1 01' the depth of the lot, but such rear yard' need not exceed twenty 1'01 feet. (k) SIDE STREET ARD REQUIRED: See Section 61.0219(k) — • Street Setback Regulations. (1) SERVICE SI.AIION SETHA('KS: (A.nl.Ord. 1413. 2!2o /(,8) l l ) Street Sethacks: (A) Protective pump island canopies shall maintain a setback of five (5) feel from the right - ul -way show,, on the adopted Master Plan of Highways. (H) 1'tunp islands, when designed parallel to the nearest right - of - way, shall maintain a setback of fifteen (15) feet from the right - of - way shown on the adopted Master Plan of Highways. ((') Pump islands. when designed at an angle of thirty (30) degrees or more to the nearest right - of - way, shall maintain a setback of twenty - five (25) feet from the right - of - way shown on the adopted Master Plan of Highways. ( ID) Area lighters shall maintain a setback of one (1) foot from the right - of - way shown ou the adopteli Master Plan of 1ighways. ll:l Free - Standing identificalNNI signs (which hate previous beeil approved b \ Planning ('Ulllrlll%SiOn action) shall maintain a Setback of five (5) lest from the right - Of- way snows On theRadopted Master Plan of lliglnvays, to the leading edge of the sign. W) All other structures over fou. (4) feet in height shall maintain sethacks as required in Section o 1.0_' 1(Ur. (2) Interior Side Yard Requirements: See Section (1 I.027A(i).' (3) Roar Yard Required: Sec Section 61.027At•1). r 364-i; 364 -o /6.30.761 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING ZONING DETERMINATION 81 -01 - SNAPP - REQUESTING THAT A COIN- OPERATED CAR WASH B &ND IMILAR N NATURE TO USES IN THE C -1 (NEIGH ME IAL) ZONE. I}4EREAS, planning Commission determin whether or not a coin - operated car wash is similar to the uses listed in the C -1 zone; and WHEREAS, the C -1 zone does allow car washing in automobile service stations; and WHEREAS, the coin- operated car wash can provide a useful service to meet neighborhood shopping needs; and WHEREAS, a coin - operated car wash already in a neighborhood shopping center within the C -1 zone, existed prior to, and after, incorporation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find: SECTION 1: Coin - operated car washes are similar in nature to Th_e'­uses listed in the C -1 zone, and that they may be allowed in the C -1 zone subject to the approval of a Conditi mal Use Permit by the Planning Commission. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of January, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 2, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE LOCATIONS r,F THE GENERAL PLAN ABSTRAt,T: At the meeting cf January 26, the Planning Commission ins cated —the desire to have information regarding criteria and process of selection of potential school sites shown on the Draft General Plan. This report discusses this matter and prepares a recommendation for future consideration of tentative school sites. BACKGROUND: Upon request of the Planning Commission, Staff has instructed each school district to provide information on criteria for selection of potential new school sites in each school district. This matter was requested following discussion of a potential junior high school location in the Alta Loma School District. Responding to this request, Mr. Floyd Stork of the Alta Loma School District has indicated his intention to be present at the January 28 meeting to discuss their criteria for site selection. Attached is information which Alta Loma School District has provided as background material. Other school districts have been unable to respond, in full, regarding their selection criteria. The City, through its General Plan, has the authority to plan for potential school site locations. The Public Facility Element requires. the location of potential sites for public schools (Section 65303). The goal of the General Plan, as approved by the Planning Commission under Public Facilities, states "community service shall be provided to meet the needs for education, cultural entertainment, protection of public health and safety, and civic pride ". Objectives within this goal set aside the need for a g-3ordinated and managed develop- ment program within the City to assure for adequate educational facilities. The General Plan indicates potential sites for school locations. These locations are determined upon consultation with the school districts and are not intended for any exact or precis; location, but rather in the general proximity of where the greatest need exists. In the developed area west of Haven, diminishing lands of appropriate size limit potential available sites. Proposed School Site Locations of the General Plan Fobruary 2, 1981 Page 2 The school districts have determined that minimum parcel size for the following schools are Necessary: Elementary 10 acres Junior High 20 acres High School 40 acres Because of this feature alone, future sites in the Alta Loma area will become increasingly more difficult to locate as development occurs. The location of potential school sites are tentative and are subject to the school district's ability to acquire a particular site. The City would consider a development proposal by a private land owner of any particular site based upon the surrounding Land Use of the General Plan. Under the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66478, a public entity which has a site located on potential development area must engage In a binding commitrnnt with the property owner within a limited period of time, or loose potential to acquire that site. In order to clarify this matter, the General Plan Text should provide a policy statement which so states that the sites are tentative and are subject to sur- rounding development potential, and a map indicating tentative school sites should be inserted into the General Plan Text, with a notation indicating the tentative nature of future site locations. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt the School Location Map (Exhibit ") as revised, and insert the following policy under "Schools" on page 107 of the Draft Genera'! Plan Text: "The tentative school site locations are provided as an indication of the general proximity for future school locations, based upon needs of the sur- rounding areas. Should the City receive a development proposal on a particular parcel which a school district has shown interest for future site location, the City will notify the district that a development plan has been submitted for consideration of approval. The school district shall provide to the City an indication of their willingness and ability to enter into a commitment for acquiring that site." Attachments: School Location Map Information Packet from Alta Loma School District y EXHIBIT A SCHOOL SITE LOCATION MAP E /J /H EXISTING SCHOOLS ell / h PROPOSED SCHOOLS Proposed achoul site locations are tentative, based upon information provided by each school district. Proposed school locations are subject to the ability of the school E district to acquire these sites. 2107 SANTIAGO OkIVE NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 82660 (714) 642 -0441 January 26, 1981 Commissioner Richard Dahl Commissioner Jeff Yong Commissioner. Herman Rempel Commissioner Jeff Sceranka Commissioner Peter Tolstory RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: SW% 6th and Archibald Rancho Cucamonga, California Honot a le Commissioners: This letter is submitted as an addition to my January 19th letter requesting ar industrial Park zoning be incorporated into the General Plan tei allow the development of a Business Park on the DeBerard Rance located at the southwest corner of 6th and Archibald and as ohown on the attached revised plan. Similar zoning is requested fronting Archibald continuing south of the subject property transcending into a Commercial. area at 4th and Archibald and continuing best fronting 4th Street. The balance of the approximate 155 net acres bounded by Hellman, 4th, Archibald and 6ea is proposed as Medium -High Residential. In accordance with the request made by the Commission at the January 19th hearing, the following land owners met on Friday the 23rd and unanimously agreed to support the above referenced proposal as outlined on the attached revised plans: Property Owners Approx. acres 1. Mr. Dor Steffensen, Senior Vice President 6,.54 The John D. Luck Company 2. Mr. Paul Byrnes, Dir. of Planning & Engineering 19.54 acres Marlborough Homes Corporation 3. DeBerard Ranch 18.39 acres January 26, 1981 Planning Commission page 2 4. Mr. Al Blessent 9.54 acres Although the Safeway property owners were not available, they have offered their support for the proposal in previous telephone conversations. 5. Safeway 19.54 acres Total Supporting Property owner's Acreage 128.55 acres The available property owners supporting the proposal represent 86% of the total acreage involved. The remaining 147, were not available, however, from other general discussions over the past year, it is my belief they would also support the proposed plan. Respectfully Submitted, `' Wili R. Patton Enclosures: Revised Area Plan January 19th letter cc: Mr.. Jack Lamb Director of Planning Rancho Cucamonga 1 2101 SANTIAGO DRIVE NCWPDXT ULACH. CALIFORNIA 92660 (7141642.0444 January 19, 2.981 Commissioner Richard Dahl Commissioner Jeff King Commissioner Herman Remnel Commissioner Jeff Sceranka Commissioner Peter Tolstory RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Business Park Zon' SWC 6th and Archibald Westside Archibald between 4th and 6th Rancho Cucamonga, California Honorable Commissicners: Please accept this letter as a formal request to incorporate into the proposed General Plan zoning to allow the development of a business, park on the approximate twenty acre DeBerard Ranch located at the southwest corner of 6th and Archibald and as shown oit the attached plan. Furthermore, similar compatible zoning is requested continuing south from the subject property on Archibald to 1•t:h Street. This request is based upon the following facts: 1. The tenets of good planning theory would indicate that zcnirg compatible with Business Park, Industrial or Commercial uses would be the highest and best utilization of a high traffic, high identity major arterial such as Archibald Avenue where thB bulk of existing development is already of those types. Such ises would provide an effective, and aesthetically pleasing bu :fer to any residential development which might be planned west o.', Archibald with primary access from the secondary east -wes!: arterials and /or Hellman Avenue. The proposed buffer zone would not inhibit immediate access to potential rapid transit along Archibald for potential residents to the west. As a matter of fact, many users of such business zoning are active in business from very early morning hours to mid- e••�ning, a time rapid transit commuters are most preveLent. Such commuters would probably appreciate an attractive laniscaped, well designed and lighted business area to walk through on their way to or from their homes. January 19, 1981 Planning Commission page 2 2. Likewise, b-it in a negative vein, the tenets of good planning relative to the location of residential uses on an arterial with the attributes of Archibald Avenue (high traffic, relatively high speeds, propensity of non - residential uses) would require such a development to be oriented internally. In other words, the view which is provided to travelers along Archibald would be a wall or other barrier designO to protect the home owners, their families and pets from the potential traffic dangers of Archibald as well as to "buffer" thn..m from the street noises and visual feeling that their home was located in an industrial park. Additional businesses mean additional sales and real property tax revenues, and although the community has excellent plans to maintain steady residential and business grow a, it should not give up any business opportunity to neighboring communities. 3. The owners of properties within tie affected area have expressed support for this proposal.. as reflected in a number of meetings and telephone conversations during recent months. 4. This proposal envisions a series of quality projects similar to the development by community :.onscious individuals or companies like Mr. Henry Reiter whose business parks are of the highest quality and by their appearance &lone have attracted new business to Rancho Cucamonga. 5. Last, and certainly least in the overall interests of community planning but of concern and interest t., the community at large is the fact that a portior..f the subject pruperty has been in the DeBerard family since 1903. The family has lived in the existing home on the southwest corner of 6th aad Archibald for more than 50 years ar :d have been irvol.ved members of the community of almost 80 years. I am of the opinion this proposal embodies the best possible in- gredients for maintaining an attractive corridor on a major Rancho Cucamonga arterial, attracting ne,.y business, continuing to increase the c-ty °s tax base, p. -otect £amities ir. the proposed residential areas. Respectfu submitted, / 4 illiam R. Patton WRP /blm Enclosure: Area Plan cc: Mr. Jack iamb Director of Planning Rancho Cucamonga GENERAL PLAN ITEMS ON JANUARY 28, 1981 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 1. Adoption of revised Energy Conservation Element (distributed at January 26 meeting) 2. Adoption of Irevised Camunity Desi n Element (distributed at January 26 meeting 3. Land Use consideration in Cucamonga Area 4th itreet and Archibald Avenue - Turner South of Foothill L,4*- Tentativ- lzchool Site Locations /Policy 5. Status of Winery and Other Possible Uses i, AJ El 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUr_AMONGA C� DATE: January 2F, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Berry K. Hogan, City Plann BY: Michael Vairin, Senior P ann SUBJECT: ON REVIEW RING ABSTRACT: During the Council's review of the Interim Zoning Ordinance, concern was expressed by the Council relative to the kinds of projects which the City Planner would refer to the Planning Commission for their consideration under the Deveiooment Review process. The Commission and Staff has informally agreed to the kinds of projects which should be con- sidered by the Planning Commission phis reivew process. However, in order of have defined guidelines relative `n the type of projects that would require Planning Commission e-,ivcw under `.i;c Development Review pro- cess a Resolution has been prepared for your con.;ideration. The attached Resoluticn, defines specific criteria that would require a project under the Development Review process to be referred to the Planning Commission for their consideration. If the Commission concurs with this criteria, then it is suggested that the attached Resolution be adopted. If other criteria is desired by the Commission, then it should be added. ANALYSIS: As the Planning Commission will recall, the Development Review process permits the City Planner to review and decide upon without Planning Commission review. These kinds of projects have generally been, small industrial and commercial projects not located on major boulevards or streets. Under the Development Review process, the City Planner also has the option to refer the project to the'Planning Commission for full review and cons Aeration. The attacned Resolution contains six areas for Planning Commission review: - Special Boulevards - Additions over 50p - Sensitive projects or areas - Multiple family projects over 10 units - Master planned projects -Ali projects with E.I.P..'s The Commission may have other areas of concern or additional criteria. Shopping centers require Conditional Use Permits and Commission review; RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and discuss the criteria suggested and adopt the attached Resolution with any desired modifications. BKH :MV:cd Attachment: Resolution of Approval ITEM K RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMT.�SION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFCxNIA, ADOPTING CRITERIA FOR PROJECTS REQUIRING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION DESIRES TO CONDUCT FULL REVIEW UPON. WHEREAS, the interim Zoning Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga permits the City Planner to refer any development project under the Development Review process to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission desires to develop specific criteria and guidance for types of projects which should be reviewed by the Planning Commission under the Development Review process; and WHEREAS, such criteria is needed to provide clear direction and guidance w Staff aiiu acve 1 Upers a i i ice. NOW, THEREFORE, The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve that it hereby finds that the following criteria shall set forth policy for which projects meeting such criteria will he referred to the Planning Commission for full review and consideration. 1. Any project being proposed ale.-.g Foothiil Boulevard, Haven Avenue, or any other f,,ecial Boulevards, as deF--ribed on the General Plan; and 2. Projects which, in the opinion of the Design Review Committee, fall within the sensitive land use areas, or sensitive environmental study areas; and 3. All projects which are master planied, however, once the master plan has been approved by the Planning Commission and does not fail on a special boulevard may be approved by the City Planner. ,. All additions that exceed 50% of the existing structure or improved site and meet requirements of 1 and 2 shall require Planning Commission approval. 5. Ali apartments and condominiums and other multiple family projects over 10 dwelling units shall require 11.anning Commission review. 6. All projects requiring an EIR shall require Planning Commission reviews. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ;; Richard Dahl, Chairman Resolution .1o. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the day of , 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: O 11 Planning Commission Meeting of RA`ZHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN -UP SHEET Please print your name, address, city, and indicate the item that You wish to speak on. Thank you. ,`,' NAME ADDRESS ChhIATY ITEM 2. 3. 4. 7 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. "23 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. ,`,'