No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/03/12 - Agenda PacketJ. Cl) J. VI 60 Mi n. Min. 120 Min. QTY of I'LANNNING COMMISSION AGENT THURSDAY, MARCH 12, 1981 LION'S P= COiII$(riZii C NTEC 9161 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegia: ice II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Sceranka Commissioner King Commissioner To'.stoy Commissioner Rempel _ III. Announcements IV. Discussion by Commission and Developer of Land Use, Circulation, Parks 8 Open Space Continents Raised Break V. Infrastructure /Design Criteria Report and Discussion by Commission, Staff and Developer VI. Adjournment 1 .I , w E- CITY OF RANCHO CCICA_NIONGA. STAFF F.] ORT DATE: March 12, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner William Holley, Director of Community Services SUBJECT: M ABSTRACT: As the Commission will recall, the Planning Commission meeting of Thursday, February 26, 1981 was cancelled by request of the developer in order to allow him additional time to prepare responses to the Commission's concerns. We have attached the previous memorandum on land use, circulation, parks and open space and the Staff Report on Infrastructure and Design Cri- teria. Recommendations will be to resolve the issues of land use, circulation, parks and open space and discuss infrastructure and design criteria. DISCUSSION: The February 2, 1981 Staff Report beings up a number of items under Parks and Open Space i.e., indicate the areas )f lake usage for boating, fishing, etc.; concession stands around the lake; trails along Etiwanda Ave- nue from the lake edge, where will they be; what are the advantages of having the lake as active or passive park land; what credit should be given for the lakes, for the trails or other open space usage; where should the additional 5 acres of park land go; and where will the developer obtain the water to fill the lakes and to keep them at a reasonable level. The Director of Community Services and the City Planner have met to discuss the issues relative to parks and open space. The following resolutions have been reached: - Fishing in the lake is acceptable and will cause no potential problems for the City. - The issue relative to concession stands should be studied to determine its economic feasibility; an economic feasibility study should be prepared by the Wm. Lyon Co. or their con- sultants and submitted to the Department of Community Services and Planning Division prior to any concession stands being located on or about the lake edge. - The issue of passive versus active open space was discussed at length by the Planning Commission during the last meeting on Parks and Open Space with no particular conclusion reached. It is the concurrence of the City Planner and Director of Com- munity Services that both passive and active recreation have value and that value cannot necessarily be equated on a scale of one to ten. It is a discretionary decision as to whether of not passive open space or active open space has more re- lative value. Therefore, we feel that to pursue discussion on passive versus active open space is an exercise in futility. t - Credit for open space provided was discussed. There are a March 12, 1981 Victoria Page Two variety of open space areas in which credit is sought. Trail credit is sought, Victoria Parkway credit Ss sought, Edison and Flood Control credit is sought, lake edge and lake surface credit is sought. It is the opinion of the City Planner and Director of Community Services that 100% credit should be given in all categories except for the Edison and Flood Control ease- ments. The two questions which we had to ask ourselves in making a recommendation were: Does the amenity provided give public recreation opportunities? The answer to the question is yes. Is it necessary for the Victoria Community Plan to have these amenities to have the plan work well? In our opinion we believe that it is necessary. The lakes provide a vital connection from the commercial Bred W Lite reDlde/ltiai area aiw PrOVide f- very good transition of an active commercial area to a more quiet, less active, residential. area. The trails and Victoria Parkway help to tie the entire planned community together as a single entity. The last issue that arose was the lake design and maintenance it- self. We suggest that the lake design and maintenance be considered as a separate topic after the planned community has been approved by the Planning Commission and City Council. The approval that would be given under the planned community review would be for the concept of lakes to be approved but the precise design and maintenance studies would come at a later date. We have an ex- ample of a typical maintenance manual on another lake prepared for the City in another community for your review at the Planning office and it will be available at the March 12 meeting. We have also attached a report dated November 24, 1980, which discusses the next two topics for review: Infrastructure and Design Criteria. As you will will rec+ll, infrastructure talks about those public services that must be provided such as sewers, water, natural gas, electricity, telephone, flood contrcl and fire. Design Criteria encompasses the Victoria Parkway, landscape standards, solar access, site planning standards, landscape grading standards and road standards. As with previous reports on the Victoria Planned Com- munity, the report of November 24, 1980 discusses the issues of infrastructure and the issues of design criteria and lists suggested conditions for the Com- mission to consider as possible conditions of approval for the planned community. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission: 1. Consider the comments and responses on land use, circulation, parks and open space by the applicant and the staff and make the appro- priate decision. 2. Consider and review infrastructure and design criteria and adopt suggested conditions of approval to be brought back in a master resolution of approval after the Victoria Planned Community has O jcompleted its review. BY.H: ik \'J 11 CITY Or RAr UiO CUrAMONGA. S-LAJT PL EPOPX DATE: February 25, 1981 p >I TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner SUBJECT: ABSTRACT: As the Planning Commission will recall at the previous Victoria Planned Community meeting we discussed the issues that had been raised un- der land use, circulation,and parks and open space. The applicant was to come back with answers to the 'issues raised at the last meeting. Staff rprnmmpndat:innc will he made at the Planning commission meeting. DISCUSSION: T.he applicant proposes to discuss five different topics under land use, i.e., General Ilan densities, boundary changes, new population distributions, regional - ^elated uses, and Base Line at Victoria Parkway commercial center. Under circulation there are five areas which will be discussed: regional perspective, Victoria circulation, circulation on Etiwanda Avenue, circulation via Rochester Avenue and circulation via Miller /Church Avenue. The applicant will make his views and reasons knawn for each of the above - mentioned items. We would suggest that the Plannii:!1 Commission review and consider these items and act on them only if the Commission feels that adequate information has been presented to satisfy the concerns previously expressed. At the last Planning Commission meeting, new boundaries for the Victoria Planned Community were presented to the Planning Commission. Questions were raised as to what the revised dwelling unit count is for Victoria Planned Community. We have generated the new General Plan number for the Victoria Planned Community revised. Allowable witi t e ictoria Plan- ned Community as defined by the new boundaries under the General Plan is 9,452 units. When the Victoria Planned Commu5�t1es oun ar s are revised on the plan presented by the William Lyon Company, the new "op- timum yield" that the Wm. Lyon Co. proposes is 9,040 dwelling units. cc: Jack Lam Gary Fryf, Wm. Lyon Co. Don Tomkins, SWA Group 0 IlJ 0 ABSTRACT: As we all are aware, the Victoria Planv;ed Community text and map has been with us for some time. Either under submittal or through an informal review process within the Community. As a reminder, there have been six meetings " Victoria. The dates are listed below: 9 -16 -80 - Generz)l kickoff meeting - establishment of review process 9-29-80 - M�1, of Land Use CfTY OF RANCHO CUCAL�.JNGA o c%`c" of Victoria and the Etiwanda Area STA.]EF REPORT Discussion of Circulation 11 -10 -80 - Discussion of parks and open space 11 -24 -80 - Discussion of review process and continuation of review o - 1981. ' F DATE: February 2, 1981 L077 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planners& SUBJECT: VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY - P.D. 80 -01 - WILLIAM LYON COMPANY Review of Arodect to date ABSTRACT: As we all are aware, the Victoria Planv;ed Community text and map has been with us for some time. Either under submittal or through an informal review process within the Community. As a reminder, there have been six meetings " Victoria. The dates are listed below: 9 -16 -80 - Generz)l kickoff meeting - establishment of review process 9-29-80 - Discussion of Land Use 10 -11 -80 - Discussion of Victoria and the Etiwanda Area 10-29 -80 - Discussion of Circulation 11 -10 -80 - Discussion of parks and open space 11 -24 -80 - Discussion of review process and continuation of review to January 1981. This memo contains a listing of the items which has arisen at each of these meetings on Victoria. Also please find attached, all of the reports that have been prepared for the Victoria Planned Community. Recommendation will be to review all of the items listed to verify that all of the issues have been considered and to give guidance to the applicant as to the additional information required. We have a';sc attached a proposed schedule to con- sideration for approval of Victoria Planned Community.which the Commission should indicate their desires for finalization. DISCUSSION: To date, tie have reviewed land use, circulation, parks and open space and have presented reports on infrastructure and design criteria. At each of the meetings on land use, circulation, parks and open space, there were suggested conditions included. The Commission, after reviewing each of the topics, then discussed each of the conditions suggested. In some cases, the conditions were modified and ir. others, conditions were added. In each of the meetings on the topics there were additional issues raised that were not answered by the text covered by conditions suggested or answered by the map. We have complied for the Commission's information and use, those issues that have been raised that have not yet been answered. rt„ �n fiS+ Victoria Planned Corf.. .lity -2- February 2, 1981 LAND USE - Commercial usage along Etiwanda Avenue (already addressed by the Sedway/ Cooke General Plan) - More detailed and regional related uses i.e. types - Victoria Street not to connect to Etiwanda Avenue - Regional related uses to Etiwanda Avenue (some examples should be shown relative to site plans; - Buffering along Base Line noad, i.e. residential uses and commercial uses - Landscape buffer at the Temple (mention was made when land adjacent to the Temple was thought to be within the planned community that there should be landscape buffering from any new use to the Temple. Now the Temple land is only contiguous to the planned community boundaries on the western property line} - Phasing of regional related uses from Foothill Boulevard north to Base Line Road - Treatment of Highland Avenue relative to architectural character and land- scape character to simulate the "rural atmosphere" - Precise planned community boundaries showing all property that is owned by William Lyon Company within the planned community and any other property that is consented to be a co- applici.nt - Adjustment of densities and land use patterns within the planned communities relative to General Plan changes - Density bonuses and affordable housing percentages CIRCULATION - Treatment of the emergency lane of traffic for Victoria parkway - Indication of what streets would be used for regional shopping center access - Efforts should be made to minimize traffic through the Etiwanda Community - Indicate a loop street plus or minus 1,000 feet from Etiwanda Avenue in order to take traffic off of Etiwanda Avenue Victoria Planned Coy'. .city -2- 1. February 2, 1981 AML PARKo AND OPEN SPACE - Indicate areas of lake usage for boating, fishing, etc. What about "con- cession stands" around the lake, How will these be handled? - Will there be any trails to Etiwanda Avenue and from Etiwanda community to the lake edge? Where will they be? Show examples. - How much land is contained within the lake edge and the lake itself. What about the issue of radiation from the power lines (this should be discussed in the draft environmental report). - What about the activp narkland versus passive parkland? Advantages, dis- advantages of each. - What credit should be given for the lakes, for the trails, for any other open space usage. - Where should the additional five acres of park land go to, if still necessary after adjustments in the General Plan densities? - Where will the developer obtain the water to fill the lakes and to keep them at a reasonable level? AUh qF We hope that we have gathered together all of the items which were discussed at the various meetings on Victoria Planned Community. The Commission should review each of the items listed above in the three categories, to determine if they are accurately revresented and if all of the issues raised by tit-! Commission are contained within the list. Our anticipation would be that at the 'February 26, 1981 meeting the applicant would have answerad most.., if not ail of the issues contained within this report and Staff would have the opportunity to make recommendations on the applicant's proposals. We still have Infrastructure and Design, and Implementation and DER to review. It would be one suggestion that the Planning Commission reserve March 12, March 26, and April 9 to complete the Planning Commission reivew of the Victoria Planned Community. These meetings would be on Thrusday night beginning at 7 :OC p.m. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission reivew the list contained within this report. Add or subtract to those lists as may be necessary, and clarify the items they wish to have brought back to them in the way of answers or solutions for the February 26 special meeting. Also, it is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt March 12. March 26, and April 9 as review dates for the completion of the review of Victoria Planned Community. BKH:cd Attachments Is l�� � u 11 LJ CITY OF RANUiO CUCAfVIO.NGA o�`cnrwc,� STAFF, RE POPX S� f "� 7 r L• DATE: November 24, 1980 F i� TO: Members of the Planning Commission I917 FROM: Barry V... Hogan, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Victoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria ABSTRACT: This report covers the topics of Infrastructure and Design Cri- teria. Infrastructure refers to the public services that must be provided to the project such as sewers, water, natural gas, electricity, telephone, flood control and fire. Design Criteria encompasses Victoria Parkway, land- scape standards, solar access, site planning standards, landscape grading standards, and road standards. As with previous reports, after the dis- cussio.n of each topic, there are suggested conditions for the Commission. DISCUSSION - INFRASTRUCTURE Much of the discussion of infrastructure topics are listed in the Draft Environmental Impact Report on pages 104 -115. The Draft Environmental Im- pact Report discusses water supply, sewage disposal, telephone service, electrical service, gas service. Of particular concern in the past has been the adequacy of sewer supply. The.Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) discusses several alternative plans for waste treatment and disposal. The Day Creek flood control channel traverses through the project north to south. Currently, this channel is unimprov9d and no plans exist for im- provement in the near fixture. Pages 47 -51 or the DEIR, discusses the hy- drology and flood control for the Victoria area. The DEIR discusses the alternatives for accepting or diverting upstreem flows, the alternatives for providing protection from a major levee outbreak during a major storm occurrence, alternative approaches for site drainage systems, and alter- native methods of funding flood control and drainage. The hydrology and flood control issues discussed within the DEIR, indicate that there is a major concern with the flood control of the Day Creek channel. Prior to the submittal of the Victoria Plan, the City contracted with L. 0. King to prepare a study of the Day Creek channel from its source in the foothills down its course into Riverside County. Any solution of the drainage problem of Day Creek must be done on a regional -wide basis in- cluding the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City of Ontario, the Counties of San Bernardino and Riverside, and any developers which may contribute to the flow through the development of their property. Limited development can occur with-r; the drainage area of Day Creek, but there must be appro- priate improvements to the Day Creek channel at the time of those develop- ments. Currently no solution has been selected as yet; however, the City Engineer is confident that a solution will be reached that is acceptable to all parties involved. The City Engineer will be available to comment on the i1ooJ control issue at the Monday night meeting. November 24, 1980 Victoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria Page Two The final topic under infrastructure is fire protection. Although fire protection is more of a community facility, its discussion fits best under infrastructure with the topics selected for review with Victoria. Fire - station No. 3 is iocated on Base Line Avenue east of Rochester Avenue in a temporary station or County -owned property leased by the Foothill Fire Protection District. The DEIR oa page 79 indicates, under impact summary. that new fire facilities will be planned and located based upon adopted plans for Victoria and adjacent properties. Fire protection will be a major concern in this development due to the recent financial situation which the Foothill Fire Protectiuri District finds itself in. Special consideration and care should be given to the provision of adequate fire services for this development and existing development in the vicinity. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS 1. The developer shall participate through financial contributions and /or construction of storm drain facilities within the Day Creek and that drainage area in accordance with a to be adopted master pian for Day Creek. Development will be allowed to take place within the drainage area so long as flood protection is provided by the developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and /or the San Bernardino Flood Control District. 2. Prior to any substantial development in any of the four villages, an alternative for sewage treatment shall be selected by the City and the Cucamonga County Water District. 3. Adequate fire protection through either expansion, of Fire Station No. 3 or the addition of another fire station or the relocation of the existing fire station shall be provided by the Foothill Fire District with the expe.nsion, addition or relocation costs paid for by the developer. DESIGN CRITERIA Under the discussion of Design '.,riteria, there are six categories: Victoria Parkway, landscape standards, solar access standards, site planning standards, landscape grading standards, and road standards. VICTORIA PARKWAY Page 127 of the Victoria Community Plan text describes fully the basic design concept for Victoria Parkway. Victoria Parkway is the key element for the overall plan for the planned community. It is provided as a continuous open space element that ties together the fragmented parcels of land that currently exist within the planring area. The parkway is a linear park that is proposed to have a two-.lane road within it. The right -of -way of the parkway varies in accordance with the adjacent land uses. Pages 128 -129 of the text give the basic desiqn concepts for the parkway. Where the parkway passes adjacent to open sapces, the right -of -way will narrow. Where the parkway passes adjacent to residential areas, the parkway right -of -way will widen. The minimum width of right -of -way is 120 feet with the maximum width of right -of -way, 180 feet. i November 24, 1980 Victoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria Page Three The parkway includes a bike trail, hiking trail and equestrian trail. Relative to the planting concept, the plan proposes three basic trees: pines, which will be located on the high ground, sycamores, as a transition tree, and alders on the low ground. Of the three trees proposed, the pines are the only evergreen. The use of the alders on the low ground will be remi- niscent of a riparian area as would be the sycamores. Victoria Parkway is not proposed to be a flat roadway but will be a split level road with one direction lower than the other ,direction, thus providing added interest and taking up grade at the same time. Pages 130 -131 of the text indicate in detail the planting concept and the grading concept. For a more precise indication of right -of -way width, please refer to pages 134 -135 of the text. It should be noted that the median island in Victoria Parkway contains an equestrian trail. The text does not indicate that the equestrian trail will begin at Deer Creek, but we believe that it is the developers intent, thus, providing a connection to the regional trail system. The equestrian trail at each intersection transitions to the street corner for crossing within the crosswalks to be provided at the signalized intersections. Where there are no signalized intersections, the equestrian trail will cross mid - street. Tile trail in the median will continue on Victoria Parkway to two outlets. One will be Victoria Street outletting to Etiwanda Avenue and the other will is be the Pacific Electric right -of -way, a proposed master planned trail. The text only indicates the outlet onto Victoria Street, but in conversations with the developer, he indicates there is no problem in extending the trail to the Pacific Electric right -of -way. Pages 144 -149 illustrate the typical edge conditions and cross sections for Victoria Parkway. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS 1. The equestrian trail contained within Victoria Parkway s':all begin at Deer Creek and terminate at the Pacific Electric. right -of -way. Specific desion of the trail shall be subject to City review. Equestrian fences, Grading, soil samples, may be reouired. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS Tne applicant proposes to use drought- resistant plan material where possible. Windrow style planting to accentuate the traditional windrow character of Etiwanda and to provide protection from wind and an Entry Hierarchy Plan in order to provide a sense of place, and of transition from one land use to another. The Entry Hierarchy Plan is contained on pages 156 -157 of the text. Typical edge conditions are depicted on pages 160 -167. Particular concern ® is with the Milliken- Highland -Base Line - Foothill sections and r•<:s�dential ® land uses. There is an indication of a median within the street; however, no indication of any trees within that median. Both the section and the planned view lack trees within the median. We would suggest that either November 24, 1980 "dictoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria Page Four accent trees be added within the median or street trees at appropriate spacing. The section of land uses indicates an 8 f ^ot minimum foot minimum for peri- meter landscape treatment in parking areas. We suggest that 10 feet is a more appropriate stanrard. additionally, the second graphic on pale 160 on the bottom right -hand corner needs to have an indication of where the property line is. On page 161, on the northern section. of Day C:eck Blvd., the street median should depict trees. On the south sectiui-., the .dndscaped area from the parking lot to the property line should be 10 fees not the 8 feet shown. On page 162 the same comment en the Miller- Victoria loop for the median and the parking lot. On page 163, the section depicted indicates that there will be a natural equestrian trail in the median from Victoria Groves Park to Victoria Street. It should indicate from Deer Creek through Victoria Groves Pa;-k to Victoria Street and to tf.e Pacific Electric right -of -way. SOLAR ACCESS STANDARDS - SITE PLANNING STANDAr1S The solar accESS standards illustrate the desirable site plan relationships in providing pessive solar access to residential dewllings within the Vic- toria Planned ivmr"nity. RESIDENTIAL SITE PLANNING STANDARDS Pages 180 -196 depict the various types of A, B, C, D, E, and F, Residential Land Uses. Each are typical examples and do not necessarily represent the precise development for any particular area but a concept. Page 184, B land use, minimal lots 7200 square feet, indicates a 4 -foot walk on one side only within that land use. Throughout the B land uses there is listed a 4 -foot walk on one side only. The Commission may wish to consider this issue to determine whether or not sidewalks should be on both sides or only on one side of the street. Additionally, you may want to make your decision in accordance with the minimum square footages proposed. Throughout pages 184 -196, we have suggested additions a•d changes to add consistency in each of the typical concepts rather than list these twice for the Planning Com- mission, we will list them in the suggested conditions. Some additional items w;A ch the Comnission may wish to consider are the re- location of these varitcular graphic concepts to the Part III Regulations and Standards section. The reason for this suggestion is that many of the explanations detailed on each of the pages contained within the residential site planning standi,r•ds are repeated in Part III of the text. SUGGESTED CONDITIONS 1. Page 184, add the word minimum in the setbacks paragraph under "garage ". 2. Page 185, the paragraph setbacks under side yard, add the words "each side ". The new phrase would read "side yard: 5 -foot minimum each side." [J i November 24, 1980 Victoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria Page Five 3. Page 18[, directly under the graphic, the words variable height fence by developer on Victoria Parkway property Tine should indicate that fence height shall not exceed 5 feet from the highest finished grade- 4. Under setbacks garage, add the words "requires garage door openers" after 5 -8 feet and add the word "minimum" after 18 feet. 5. Under side yard indicate 5 -foot for each side yard.rather than 10 feet between buildings. 6. On page 187 indicate in paratheses under the graphic after the phrase developer to provide fencing on corner lots and adjacent to community trail system "(see page 189) ". 7. Under setbacks, garage, add the words "requires garage door openers" after 5 to 8 feet. Also indicate what width sidewalks and location of said sidewalks. 8. Page 188, indication of minimum parking requirements may require a change in the Rancho Cucamonga Parking Ordinance. Should the ordinance not change, the indication of minimum parking standard should be amended to be consistent with current code requirements. Also there is no indication of the kinds of sidewalks or location of sidewalks. 9. Page 188 under setbacks garage, add "requires garage door openers" after 5 to 8 feet. 10. Page 189, the second note from the top of the page add the words "5 -foot maximum" so the phrase will read, 5 -foot maximum back yard Fence adjacent to trail by developer. 11. Page 189, the second note from the top of the page add the words 5 -foot maximum" so the phrase will read, 5 -foot maximum back yard fence adjacent to trail by developer. 12. Page 190 under garage setback, add "requires garage door openers" after 5 to 8 feet and add the words "or sidewalk" after, curb so the phrase will read garage setback: 5 to 8 feet (requires garage door openers) from back of curb or sidewalk. The indication under garage setback of the parking requirement is in excess o` what current code requirements are and should indicate code requirements. 13. Page 193 under the graphic indicates minimum of one covered parking space per dwelling, additional spaces 3s specified in Part III. This requirement is different from the existing parking code and should be consistent. Ask 14. Under the graphic there is an indication where sound attenuation walls are required they may not be needed to be continuous but may work satisfactorily when broken or staggered. The words "however, in P11 cases these must be consistent with the adopted Noise Or- dinance" should be added. C. November 24, 1980 Victoria Community Plan - Infrastructure and Design Criteria Page Six 15. Page 196 under the first graphic. the words "automatic garage 'door openers required" should be added after 5 to 8 feat. LA14DSCAPE GRADING STANDARDS The applicant proposes contour grading and grading of open space to create views and take up grade. All of the graphics illustrated on pages 202 -206 are of excellent depiction of the kinds of grading standards that are pro- mulgated by the Grading Committee and the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. ROAD STANDARDS On pages 212 -215 the applicant proposes road standards I -or Victoria Planned Community. Except for Victoria Parkway, the road standards for Victoria should be consistent with the road standards for other areas within Rancho Cucamonga. The City Engineer will present at the Monday night meeting, the proposed standards for reads within Rancho Cucamonga. SUGGESTED CONDITION: All road standards shall conform to those of the City of Rancho Cucamonga except for Victoria ?arkway. CONCLUSION As a reminder to the Planning Commission, the suggested conditions contained within this report are not refined to the point where they can be specifically applied to Victoria Planned Conmiunity. They are to be used as a guide for staff in preparing final conditions for consideration by the Planning Com- mission when the review process culminates. In order for staff to have ade- quate direction to proceed on to the next categories and to prepare final conditions for consideration, we would recommend, if the Commission concurs with the suggested conditions, that they be adopted to provide for staff's preparation of final conditions for consideration. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Res}fect fu 1,Ty ,546mi tted, ARR Ci ✓Plan BKH: jk n 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. ADDRESS CITY ITEM ' 333 � �, a. ° 1�. 14 Z I Planning Commission Meeting of RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSI011 SIGN -UP :HEET Please print your name, address, city, and indicate the item that you wish to speak on. Thank you. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. ADDRESS CITY ITEM ' 333 � �, a. ° 1�. 14 Z I