No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/03/25 - Agenda Packet1 I. .t t s • R.� r c i ACTION I II. III. IV V c e�� CIT`i OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION.. AGENDA WEDNESDAY MARCH 25, 1981 7 :00 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 91El BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Coranissioner Dahl X_ Commissioner King X Commissioner Sceranka _1L_ Approval of Minutes January 22, 1581 Announcements Co,�sent Calendar "Im Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Tolstoy The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. if anyone has concern ovor any item, then it should be removed for discussion. Approved 5 -0 -0 A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81- H SSER - The development of a 21,600 sq. ft. n u trial warehouse addition to the existing Schlosser Forge on 3 acres of land in the M -2 zone located at 11711 Arrow Route - APN 229 - 111 -18 VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings ir which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Approved 5 -0 -0 Planning Commission Agenda p -2- March 25, 1981 MGUM111tL - A total residentiai development of 9.76 acres into 33 lots in the R -1 zone generally located on the northeast corner of Ramona and Church - APN 208 - 181 -06 Approved 5 -0 -0 C. ENVI Appi'ov_ed 4-1 -0 D. with condition that 9 mos. after occupancy of temp. bldg. precise plans be submitted for perminant structure along with more precise plans E. for rest of center. Continued to 5 -13 -81 to bring back P.M. & residential alter - natives. F. Approved 5 -0 -0 with amendment to require design review for all lots within subdivision. 01N L a U L1M11tU - A total residential development of 8.31 acres into 2 lots comprising 120 condnminiuir snits in the southeast corner of Archibald and Victoria APM 202- 181 -07 south of 211 -12 ENVI ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PER.MIT NO. RD BANK - The development of G temporary on 5.69 acres in the C -2 zone located 150' ill on the west side of Vineyard - A ?N 207- 7 81 LUKU - JSsq1MMANULL BAP11S -r CHURCH.)_ - The construction of a ,000 . ft. church bui ing on on 2.07 acres of land in the R -1 zone located on the south side of 19th Street, between Amethyst and Archibald - APN 202 - 111 -19 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10035 THE DEVELOPERS - A__re_t_idA_.n_t__i_a1 subdivision of 15.7 acres of laid into 39 custom lots in the R -1 -12 zone located east of Red Hill Country Club Dirve, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207- 101 -37 and 207- 092 -10 G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT THE PARCEL MAP NO. 6761 Removed from Agenda CARNELIAN INVESTMENT - A residential subdivision of 18.7 acres into 2 parses in the R -1 zone located on the south- west corner of Highland Avenue and Carnelian Street - APN 201 - 214 -05 Cori L'inued to 4 -8-81 H. PARCEL MAP NO. 6725 - DAON CORPORATION - A commercial subdivision of 176.86 acres into 10 parcels in the M -2 zone located east of Haven Avenue on the south side of Foothill - APN 208 - 351 -03, 13 Approved 5 -0 -0 with amendment. VII. VIII. Approvred 5 -0 -0 -- with additional pro- vision of no outside storage. IX. X AADproved 4 -0 -0 -1 to allow appeal for G.P. Amendment XI. HEAVY INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATION REPORT: Phase I Approved 4 -0 -0 -1 that area #1 be XII. reclassified general industrial. XIII. Phase II Approved 4 -0 -0 -1 to be changed to heavy industrial classification for area 42. Planning. Commission Agenda -3- March 25, 1981 I. DAV S V P4 -An industrial subdivision of 4.39 acres of land into 8 parcels within the M -R zone located on the north side of 7th Street, east of Hellman - APN 209- 171 -37 Old Business New Business 1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT AND DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -01 COCA COLA - The development of a 26,800 sq. ft. bottled beverage distribution and warehouse facility on 9.2 acres of land in the M -2 zone, located on the north side of 6th Street, between Ha%,en Avenue and Cleveland Avenue - APN 209 - 271 -21 (Easte n Portion) - (Parcel 2 of Tent. P.M. No. 6544) Council Referrals Director's Reports K. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. Upcoming Agenda Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission 'This regular meeting of the Planning Commission is adjourned to a public hearing ^n the Victoria project on Thursday, Phase III March 26, 1981 at the Lion Park Community Center located Approved 4 -0 -0 -1 at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, at 8:00 p.m. that in area H3 the 2 uses already there can expand to their ultimate without coming back to Planning Commission. Other portion of area will remain in general industrial. I !1 L r Lot z O / O � E J � tr / 1 / C W % LL4 u J ` J <J r Q 3t u 17 <N J CJ �ravnODH I, J i I' r� 0 Ej '!S NVI'13NHYl Ew 2 �� C) o r [ � z U a z N Z LL q.• W r< n z x .'• =0J < =u 1 f� z a a a < J CL J YI f N C W N Y F _ r� V 0.1. < LL 20W o3a 'ev Q I 2 � 0 R- iQ i °a r¢ i< �J a '2 0 I� W iZ 0 a F 2 R: 1 °s F. C O 2 '1 n 1J 1977 CITY Or RANCHO CLICAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY MARCH 25, 1981 7:00 P X.. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempel Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Sceranka III. Approval of Minutes January 22, 1981 • daw IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. if anyo.ie has concern over any item, then it should be removed for discussion. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -10 SC4LOSSER - The development of a ,600 sq. ft. n us- trial warehouse addition to the existing Schlosser Forge on 3 acres of land in the M -2 zone located at 11711 Arrow Route - APN 229- 111 -18 1'I. Public Hearings i The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals mail voice their opinion of the related project. please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Planning Commission Agenda -2- March 25, 1981 I B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10316 McDANIEL - A total residential development of 9, acres into 33 lots in the R -1 zone generally located on the northeast corner of Ramona and Church - APN 208 - 181 -06 7)C ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11608 1 5 G LIMITED - A total residential development of 8.31 acres into 2 lots comprising 120 %ondominium units in the southeast corner of Archibald and Victoria APN 202 - 181 -07 Co ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -04 - VINEYARD RANK - The .development of a temporary t J bank facility on 5.69 acres in the C -2 zone located 150' (� south of Foothill on the west side of Vineyard - APN 207 - JJJ 211 -12 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SITE APPROVAL NO. 81 -01 LORD - SHOBE JIMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH - The construction of a 5,000 sq. ft. church bui ding on 2.07 acres of land " in the R -1 zone located on the south side of 19th Street, between Amethyst and Archibald - APN 202 - 111 -19 I F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10035 4� THE DEVELOPERS - A resident al subdivision of 15.7 lend into 39 custom lots in the R -1 -12 zone located east of Red Hill Country Club Dirve, south• f Calle Coraxon - APN 207- 101 -37 and 207 - 092 -10 acr G.NVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT THE PARCEL MAP NO. 6761 NELIAN INVESTMENT - A residential subdivision of 18.7 es into 2 parcels in the R -1 zone located on the sout - west corner of Highland Avenue and Carnelian Street - A N 201 - 214 -05 H. PARCEL MAP NO. 6725 - DAON CORPORATION - A commercial subdivision of 176.96 acres into 0 parcels to the M -2 mac( — �I zone located east of 4aven Avenue on the south side cf Foothill - APN 208 - 351 -03, 13 I 8 - t • Planning Commission Agenda -3- March 25, 1981 fAA--, I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP N0. 724 �AVISb - n Industrial su vsono 4.39 acres of land into 8 parcels within the M -R zone located on the north side of 7th Street, east of Hellman - APN 209- 171 -37 VII. Old Business VIII. New Business J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -01 COCA COLA - The development of a 26,800 sq. ft. bott ed �� beverage distribution and warehouse facility on 9.2 6LA acres of land in the M -2 zone, located on the north side of 6th Street, between Haven Avenue and Cleveland Avenue - APN -209- 271 -21 (Eastern Portion) - (Parcel 2 of Tent. P.M. No. 6544) ® IX. Council Referrals X. Director's Reports I K. FOOTHILL BO SOUTHEAST C V XI. Puolic Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. XII. Upcoming Agenda XIII. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission This regular meeting of the Planning Commission is adjourned to a public hearing on the Victoria project on Thursday, March 26, 1981 at the Lion Park. Community Center located at 9161 Base Line, Rancho Cucamonga, at 8:00 p.m. C� b.0 C ccz +, U U w C U _ 0 79 T. GTY OF RANCHO CUCAMO CA CITY COUNCIL AGENI)k 1977 MONDAY, MARCH 30, 1981 7:00 p.m. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CEWE,R 9161 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Flag Salute B. Roll Call: Frost Mikels Palombo Bridge Schlosser 60 Min. 2. CONTINUATION OF REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF LAND USE AND DEVELGPMENI SUPER GI PWNT TCYT Review of the Land Use and Development Super Element Text has been continued from the previous City Council meeting in order that the City Council may address any additional comments. Within this Element includes Rousing, Circulation, Public Facilities, Parks and Recreation, and Community Design. 60 Min. 3. CONSIDERATION FOR ADOPTION OF LAND USE IN THE ALTA LOMA AREA The City Council heard testimony at their March 16 meeting regarding land use items in the Alta Loma area. These items have been brought back to the City Council for their consideration. Once the City Council has completed their review of the land use in the Alta Loma area, it is recommended that they take action to adopt the Land Use Plan. 60 Min. 4. CONSIDERATION FOR ADOPTION OF LAND USE IN THE CUCAMONGA AREA The City Council heard testimony at their March 16 meeting regarding land use items in the Cucamonga area. These items have been-brcaght back to the City Council for their consideration. Upon completion of their review of the Cucamonga area, it is recommended that the City Council consider adoption of the Land Use Plan. 5. ADJOURNMENT The next meeting on the General Plan will be held April 6 to consider certification of the Environmental Impact Report and adoption of the Draft General Plan. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANUUM DATE: March 25, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF REVISION TO GENERAL PLAN IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA ABSTRACT: This memorandum considers revision to the Draft General Plan to i e heavy industrial south of Arrow, east of Haven, and to rede- fine the definition of Heavy Industrial in the Draft Plan text. BACKGROUND: City Council, at their March 23 meeting, reviewed the land use classifications within the industrial area. It was requested by property owners in and around Jersey Street, east of Haven Avenue, that the City Council reclassify the area bounded between Arrow, 8th Street, east of Haven to Rochester Avenus to Heavy Industrial and to rewrite the Draft General Plan definition of Heavy Industrial to more clearly define uses which exist in the area around Jersey Avenue. The City Council approved Heavy Industrial for the area south of Arrow Highway (as shown on the attached map), and asked the Planning Commission to consider other areas suitable for Heavy Industrial in the vicinity as well as redefine the Heavy Industrial Land Use definition. In order for the City Council to make any final determination on re- :i- sions, it is necessary for the Planning Commission to consider this matter. The Council's action to revise the land use plan had already been discussed by the Planning Commission; however, the Commission has not previously discussed other areas for the Heavy Industrial type use nor a revision to Heavy Industrial Lara Use definition. This matter should be discussed by the Planning 'Commission and forwarded with re- commendations to the City Council for their next meeting. RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission consider if o,.her areas are appropriate for Heavy Industrial classification. Also, the Plan- ning Commission should consider a revision to the Heavy Industrial de- finition as,sh�own on attached Exhibit "A ". fulAy Ahbmitted, tylVianner BKH:TJB:jk Attachment: Revised Definition of Heavy Industrial REVISED DEFINITION OF HEAVY INDUSTRIAL Heavy industrial uses are generally large scale developments whose activity includes heavy manufacturing, compounding, processing or fabrication. Such uses may also include warehousing, storage, freight handling, truck services and terminals. Through the Industrial Specific Plan, greater definition of uses will be established in the sub -areas of this land use category. An ex- ample of industrial heavy uses west of Devore Freeway include; forge shops, steel milling facilities, plastic plants, steel fabrication facilities, weld- ing shops, woodworking facilities and heavy machine shops. Uses east of the Devore Freeway could include large structures to facilitate processing and manufacturing and open area storage of raw or semi - refined Droducts. Exhibit "A" 1 I 1 � 47, z J V/ v W zzcr- J � I M z Y cc Q G. J J Q Q e w V) T_ =D O Z a nu I u V y w o y a C N r O N S 4 O Q a o. L V O J A O Oi OI O; O. L O Y N 9 O O A b • m m m m m S • C R •1 i0 9 v ✓ L L L N m •r � C C .�•• O A L M Y Y Y Y 4 O O N Y F N N N N N y O O T n N S n 12 N M C M N J y c O .c ^yp1 o E e „ xE C? yE C Y P L L N L ^Y o vC c gam• YyN a oyy L O O � �! rte•. i 4 r N V Y 4 V O e p L L w 1 N O r A Q r 4 O O• h N Oi A ^ r1 C O' N O N � G •• N� O N ^ • A � 1r • Y F C p N • O 8 N C Y O N Y yN N L yN N a wm N N N n 1'1 � N d ti g L O s ara c c m Y c Y Y Y o O O yCy 6 m O U N J O 2 S CD W Q: W N � J J J vi H H J W H N VI d' a m O N Z Z C a Ir H C3 N Z S cc J rr cc w w 3 z z a W W W C7 U' 2 u u g a nu I u V y w o y a C N r O N S 4 O Q a o. L V O J A O Oi OI O; O. L O Y N 9 O O A b • m m m m m S • C R •1 i0 9 v ✓ L L L N m •r � C C .�•• O A L M Y Y Y Y 4 O O N Y F N N N N N y O O T n N S n 12 N M C M N J y c O .c ^yp1 o E e „ xE C? yE C Y P L L N L ^Y o vC c gam• YyN a oyy L O O � �! rte•. i 4 r N V Y 4 V O e p L L w 1 N O r A Q r 4 O O• h N Oi A ^ r1 C O' N O N � G •• N� O N ^ • A � 1r • Y F C p N • O 8 N C Y O N Y yN N L yN N a wm N N N n 1'1 � N d ti g L O s ara c c m Y c Y Y Y o O O yCy 6 m O U N J O 2 S I lu 110 -XI W ui .......... Cl) hd cc I= < V) L") cl: Cl V) -XI c- W ui Cl) hd cc I= < V) L") cl: Cl V) ........... L) —j _j fa LLI V) ............. LU ui uj w ui 0 CD = c- oi19' W hd cc I= < V) L") cl: Cl V) L) —j _j LLI V) =D LU ui uj w ui 0 CD = oi19' 1977 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA mepw Phillip D.9ehloeeer Arthur! 1. Bridge Jon D. Mihrle • see I . Frost Mlehael A. Palombo A G E N D A ADVISORY COMMISSION Parch 26, 1981 Iions Center 6:30 P.M. Designation o:` Chairman (Cucamonga) Call To Order Approval of M:rutes: February 19, 1981 Staff Report At its meetinc of February 19, 1981, the Ran:ho Cucamonga Advisory Commission requested that a special. meeting be held to discuss the initiative process and relate other cities' experiences with initiatives. 4ttached to your agenda is a memorandum outiinini the procedures for Initiative and Referendum Elections, as well as an over7iew of Growth Cont:ol. Both Lauren Wasserman ani Jack Lam will .le present to discuss the initiative, growth, and this General Plan. Staff reports Have been limited to the discussion of the initiat :ve and the General Plan at the Commission's request. immediately following the Advisory Commissica meeting at 8:00 p.m., a Victoria Planned Community Paeting will be held by the Planning Commission. New Business Adjournment POST OFFICE BOX 807 0 RANCHO (UCAX3NGA, CALIFORNIA 91730 0 (731)989-1851 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM March 19, 1981 TO: Advisory Commission FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Manager SUBJECT: Procedures far Initiative and Referendum Elections The procedure for an initiative or referendum election is quite complax; therefore, I have attached sections of the State Election Code which outline in some detail the process which must be followed in order to qualify a measure for either an initiative or referendum. Essentially the number of signatures required for an initiative is 15% of the registered voters. As of this writing, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has 22,744 voters. A 15% figure would be 3,411 valid sig- natures. In the.event a Special Election is required, the cost to the City approximates $25,000 - $30,000. These costs are for ballot materials, postage, election supplies, precinct workers and related expenses. That figure is tentative and is based upon our experience with only one previous election. If you have any questions which cannot be answered by the attached materials, please contact me. LMW /vz Enclosure the fact that to the best of his knowledge and belief each signature is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and " 1 the dates between which all signatures were appended. lI First Day The petition may not be circulated until 21 days after publication or to Circulate posting or both of the notice of intention and statement. (e) Last Day 5. DEADLINE FOR FILING PETITIONS: The petition and all sec - to File tions thereof must be filed within 180 days from date of publication or posting (in the case of annexation of territory, within 180 days from date first signature affixed to petition). (f) Prima Facie The Clerk shall accept the petition for filing if a prima facie examina- Examination lion shows the number of signatures appended equal to or in excess of 10% of the :cgistered voters of the City (see paragraph A. above, for cities under 1000 registered voters) as last reported officially to the Secretary of State. The petition shall be deemed filed as of this date. (g) Verification 6. EXAMINATION OF PETITION: Within 30 days from date of of Signatures filing the Clerk shall check the validity of the signatures using the original affidavits of registration or legally prepared facsimile signa- tures. If the petition contains more than 500 signatures the signatures may be examined by random sampling, that is,an examination of 5% or 500 signatures, whichever is the greater, and if statistical sampling would indicate chat 90 to 110% of the number of signatures needed to declare the petition sufficient are valid the Clerk shall proceed to examine and verify each signature filed. Certification if the petition is found insufficient no further action shall be taken. If found sufficient the proponents -vho are notified of insufficiency as well) are notified and a certificate of sufficiency is filed with the Legislative Body. (h) Initiative B. CALLING THE ELECTION: SPECIAL ELECTION: As indicated in Election May paragraph A, preceding, an election is called not less than 74 days not be Held on One more than 89 days after date of the order. Section 4020 states that the of Several special election shall be called not less than 74 nor more than 89 days after Dates presentation of the ordinance to the City Council; however to avoid hold- ing more than one election within any six months period the date may be Fixed later than 89 days but as early a date as practicable zRer expiration of six months from the last special election. When it is possible to hold the special election within six months prior to a regular municipal elec- tion the ordinance may be submitted at the regular election instead of dt a special election. (i) Referendum C. PRELIMINARY STEPS: REFERENDUM: With the exception of ordinances relating to elections, preservation of public peace, health or safety, street improvement proceedings and other special ordinances governed by state law, no ordinance shall become effective until 30 days after its final passage. (j) Number of 1. PETITION PROTESTING ADOPTION: A petition signed by net Signatures less than 10% of the registered voters of the City, or in cities witn less than 1000 voters by not less than 25% of the voters or 100 voters (which - Filing ever sum is less), may be filed with the Clerk protesting adoption of Deadline the ordinance. It must be filed within 30 days from date of adoption REFERENCES (e( 4004 -4006, in 4006. (t) 4008. (h) 3707, 3708. 4009. (t) 4010.4020. U/ 4030. 4030.1. PUB. JUNE. 1977 42 CHAPTER SEVEN - INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM ELECTIONS (NOTE: These elections are exempt from the requirements of Division Four, Chapter One, "Estabiishcd Election Dates" and may be held at any time provided by law that the measure or proposition qualifies for submission to the electorate.) Special A. PRELIMINARY STEPS; INITIATIVE: Any proposed ordinance may Election submitted to the Legislative Body of a city by a petition filed with the City Clerk and when such petition, duly circulated according to law, con- tains the signatures of 15% or more of the voters of the City, or where the City has less than 1000 voters contains the signatures of 25% of the voters or 100 voters (whichever is the lesser number) together with a request that the ordinance be submitted to vote of the people, the Legislative Body may either adopt the ordinance at a regular meeting or call a special election not less than 74 nor more than 89 days after date of the order. (a) Regular If the petition is signed by not less than 10% of the voters or in cities with Election less than 1000 registered voters by 25% of the voters or 100 voters (which- ever is the lesser) and the ordinance is not required to be submitted to the voters or is not to be submitted to the voters at a special election and is not passed by the Legislative Body, then it shall be submitted to the voters at the next regular municipal election occurring within at least 45 days after the order of the legislative Body. (b) Publication or 1. NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CIRCULATE: Prior to circula- Posting of tion the proponents of a petition shall publish a "Notice of Intention Notice of to Circulate Petition" at least once in a newspaper of general circula- Intention tion - if there be no adjudicated paper of general circulation within the city then publication shall be in a newspaper of general circula- tion adjudicated as such within the County in which the City is located and the notice and statement shall also be posted in three public places within the City such as are utilized for the posting of ordinances or if there be neither a newspaper adjudicated as one e! gmral circu- lation within the City or the County then the notice shall be posted as stated above. (c) Content 2. CONTENT OF NOTICE: The "Notice of Intention to Circulate Petition" shall be so titled and shall contain the names and signatures of at least one but not more than five proponents and shall contain a statement not exceeding 500 words setting forth the reason for the proposed petition. (d) Filing of 3. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION: Within 10 days of publication, Affidavit posting or both, proponents shall file affidavit of publication executed by representative of newspaper or of posting executed by a voter of the City - such affidavit together with a true copy of the notice and statement as published or posted shall be filed with the Clerk of the legislative body. Petition 4. CIRCULATION OF THE PETITION: The petition may be in one May be or more sections, however each section shall bear a copy of the notice in Sections and statement and each petition or section shall have attached to it the affidavit of the circulator thereof setting forth his qualifications, REFERENCES (a) 4010. (6) 4011, (c) I00J. (d) 4001. PUB. JUNE. 1977 41 of the ordinance and the effective date of the ordinance is thereby suspended. Unlike petitions on initiative measures there are no requirements for posting or publications of notices of intent. Content 2. REQUIREMENTS OF PETITION: Like the initiative petition, the petition for referendum may be circulated in sections and each section shall contain a copy of affidavit of circulator attached there- to. (k) Certification 3. EXAMINATION BY CLERK: Examination shall be in the same by Clerk manner as for initiative petitions - first the prima facie examination and thereafter the random sampling and verification of signatures. (See paragraph A(6), preceding.) If the signatures were not all appended within 30 days from adoption of the ordinance and the petition filed within that time the petition is void. (1) 4. Elections shall be called and held in the same manner as those for initiative measures. (m) Suggested D. CONDUCT OF THE ELECTION: NOTICE: Assuming a special elec- Publication tion for initiative or referendum has been called to be held not less than Date for 74 days nor more than 89 days from date of the order or ordinance and Notices assuming there is not a consolidation with another election it is suggested that NOTICE OF THE ELECTION be published or published and posted ::t the earliest possible date. 1. PUBLICATION: Once a week for two successive weeks with five days intervening between publication date. (See Publication Notice of Election on Measure under General Municipal Calendar.) (n) Notice to 2. ARGUMENTS: While Sections 4015 and 4017 preempts filing of File Arguments arguments for and against initiative and referendum measures, the State Supreme Court has held that others may file arguments where those favored by these sections fail to do so. It is therefore suggested that the Clerk set and notice by publication or posting, or both, dead- lines for accepting arguments for the measures submitted. (See Argu- ments under tab- General Municipal Elections.) Preferences shall be given in the same order as those cited for general municipal elections and shall conform as to length and requirement as !o verification and format. (o) 3. Rebuttai arguments may be provided for; pursuant to Elections Code section 4015.5. See paragraph K.5. under tab GENERAL MUNIC- IPAL ELECTIONS for procedure to permit rebuttals. Publication 4. NOTICE OF PRECINCTS - POLLING PLACES AND BOARD Notice MEMBERS: Procedure is the same as those for the general munici- Polling pal election. The notice must be published not less than 20 days prior Places to the date of the election. (p) REFERENCES (k1403:, 11140514036. (n) 4037. fa) 2.783J. (o) 4013, 50104016. (p) 1:834. REV. DEC. 1977 43 General 5. In every other respect the election is conducted as is a general muni- Procedure cipal election. While the Clerk shall cause a copy of the ordinance or measure proposed to be mailed with the sample ballot at least 10 days prior to the elections, the Legislative Body may direct that a synopsis of the ordinance be prepared by the City Attorney and mailed where the ordinance exceeds 1000 words in length. However the synopsis must warn the voter that it is a synopsis and is not the complete text of the ordinance or measure, and offer to mail a complete text of the ordinance or measure to the voter at the voter's request by returning "......the enclosed prepaid postcard" at no cost to the voter. (q) 6. INITIATIVE: EFFECTIVE DATE: If a majority of the voters vote in favor of the ordinance it shall be considered as adopted on the date the tote is declared by the Legislative Body, and shall go into effect 10 days after that date. (r) Applicability to NOTE: Articles I and 2 (commencing with Sections 4000 and 4050, respectively) of Charter Cities the El. Code covering initiative and referendum do not apply to cities having a charter adopted under Section 3 Article XI of the Constitution and having no such charter provisions for the initiation of ordinances directly by the voters. (s) Petitions to NOTE: If the charter itself doe: not set forth the procedure governing its amendment Amend Charter or revision see Chapter Eleven on "City Charter Elections" setting forth the sections of the Government Code that govern such procedure. RdFERENCES (y) 40 ?9. (r) 4011. 1+) 4061. REV. JAN. 1980 44 March 20, 1981 TO: Members of Advisory Comnission FROM: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Mana SUBJECT: Growth Control -- An Overview The members of the Advisory Commission have requested additional infor- mation concerning alternatives available to control residential growth ;n Rancho Cucamonga. Until recently, both growth control and zoning matters have been traditionally determined by City Councils and the appointed Planning Commissions. However, since June of 1978 at least 32 growth related propositions have been voted on by the people. As of this date, nineteen passed. These ballot propositions have taken two forms. Some are initiatives, written by citizens outside of government and put on a general election ballot. Others are referenda. A referendum is a proposal written by a city council and submitted to the people for a vote. The "successful" propositions attack growth in several ways: 1. Some set growth -rate limits. Santa Barbara's initiative, for example, limits population growth to .9% per year. The City of Santa Cruz limits its growth to 1.4% per year. 2. Some limit the number of new dwellings allowed. Belmont's initiative allows only 56 units per year and Redlands' allows 450. 3. Stockton's and Modesto's measures effectively require a popu- lar vote before those cities can expand beyond their present limits. 4. Measures in Tuolumne and Santa Crut Counties directed the Board of Supervisors to prepare growth management plans. The Tuolumne initiative was followed by a stronger proposal which would have cut the county's growth rate from 12% to 3.4 %, but the measure was defeated. Continued....... 4 Growth Control - An Overview March 20, 1981 Page Three significant to note that most of the interest in a growth limitation ballot measure occurred be Pore the City Council had made any decisions on the proposed Sedway /Cooke General Pla:i. The elected City Council has already responded to most of the concerns expressed by citizens of the City. Densities originally proposed by the General Plan con- sultants, Sedway /Cooke, have been reduced significantly by the Council. It is anticipated that further density reductinns may be directed by the City Council or Planning Commission at the time the Terra Vista specific plan is reviewed later this year. The democratic process mandates that City Council members be elected by citizens to make critical decisions concerning major city policies. Those representatives have demonstrated a sensitivity to the concerns of their constituents by suggesting numerous changes in the proposed General Plan. The initiative or referendum process should be available as a "last resort ", only when elected representatives have failed to respond to the concerns of citizens. That has not been the case in Rancho Cucamonga. Other reasons why a ballot measure may not be in the best interest of the Community are: Ballot measures represent a less than desirable method for establishing public policy. The democratic process has demonstrated that public policy is best determined by elected representatives. 2. Ballot measures are expensive and generally cumbersome to administer. Ballot measures, once enacted can be changed only by approval of the voters. There is virtually no rap ctical way to quickly rectify a problem which may arise with a voter - approved measure. 4. Ballot measures dealing with growth limitations often fail to con- sider what may be best for the entire community rather than; a specific interest group. 5. Advocates of ballot measures frequently fail to evaluate the negative economic imput on the community. This is particularly important in cities which are attempting to establish a sound economic foundation by attractin, regional shopping centers. 6. Ballot measures occasionally represent a radical approach to a problem or an overreaction to a past decision of elected representatives. Continued...... Growth Control March 20, 1981 Page Two - An Overview 5. Riverside's initiative sets minimum lot sizes, with larger lots required on hillsides. 6. Siskiyou's Board of Supervisors asked voters in Scott Valley if they approved of a draft land use plan for their area. They did. The plan was prepared by a committee of local citizens. 7. A few ballot propositions have dealt with specific projects rather than growth control in general. For example, Santa Barbarans voted against funding an aqueduct to connect the city to the state water system. The inevitable result: growth control by thirst. Sacramento voters rejected a proposed sports stadium that might have stimulated development of farm land near the city. A proposal to stop construction of the Warm Springs Dam in Sonoma County, however, was soundly defeated. These measures share some kinship with Proposition 13. They were enacted through the popular election process, not by elected officials. They indicate a statewide distrust of established government by removing powers traditionally lodged there. They also favor established, homeowning residents. They involve experiments that established "experts" tend to regard as radically tough. The initiatives suggest a trend toward greater popular acceptance of growth control than was apparent before Proposition 13 passed. Numerous growth management ordinances passed in the traditional way by city councils and county supervisors in the last two years point the same direction. The record of these initiative documents show that growth control is one of the most hotly controversial issues in California today. More initiatives passed than failed, but many did fail. Spending against them has been substantial. Locally elected officials have converted growth control into a ballot propositiun partly because they recognised that their consti- tuencies and financial supporters were badly divided and sometimes not fully informed of the issues. Members of the Advisory Commission are aware that Rancho Cucamonga already has one of the strictest growth control measures in the State. The City's Growth Management Plan does not set up arbitrary limitations on the number of dwellings constructed each year. Rather, the plan emphasizes consistency with the General Plan, the ability of schools to accommodate additional students, and the ability of the City and the Cucamonga County Water District to provide essential public services which are required as residential growth occurs. Based on our experiences during the General Plan process, it appears that the issue of growth initiatives was generated as a result of citizen con - cera over densities recommended by the Planning Commission. It is Continued..... Growth Control -- An Overview March 20, 1981 Page Four Although it is far from perfect , the democratic system of government which places the responsibility for determination of public policy with elected representatives is still the most effective way to operate the City. The challenge confronting each of us is to encourage the fullest exchange of ideas and to express some degree of trust in those whom we elected to represent olir interests. It is recommended that no action be taken to advocate a growth limitation ballot measure. LMW/ vz RANCHO CUCAMONGA ADVISORY COMMISSION MINUTES February 19, 1981 1. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission was held at the Rancho Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9719 Arrow Highway. The meeting was called to order at 6:34 by Chairman Sharon Romero. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Sharon Romero, Mary V. Lane,Nacho Gracia, Joe White, Don Baer-, T. Harrell Allen, John Vlasic, Marge Stamm, Helen Blanchard, Dennis L. Stout, Jim Mendez, Glenn Rankin Absent: Mary L. Barlow, Faye E. Stamper, Charles J. Buquet Also Present: Councilmen Frost and Mikels; Jack Lam, Dir. of Community Devl.; Bill Holley, Dir. of Community Services; Harry Empey, Finance Director; Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer; Bob Rizzo, Administrative Aide, Dave Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Due to a lack of a quorum at this point, Chairman Romero postponed approval of the minutes until other members of the Commission arrived. Discussion proceeded on those items which did not require that a quorum be present. 4. STAFF REPORTS a. Eucalyptus Globulus Tree Maintenance Chairman Romero reported that at a previous meeting, the Commission had asked the City if they could put residents in touch with someone from the tree maintenance business who could offer a lower rate for maintenance of Eucalyptus Trees on private property. David Leonard, Maintenance Supervisor, introduced Pat Mahoney from West Coast Arborist (the company which has been awarded the contract for tree maintenance for the City). Mr. Leonard reviewed the cost to the City for tree maintenance and stated that the cost for trimming a 24" diameter Eucalyptus tree would be $105.00. Mr. Mahoney said that this rate is about 50% lower than the amount that would be charged to an individual homeowner who contacted them. However, he stated that if a group of homeowners got together the cost would be lower than the individual rate, but not as low as the City contract rate. Discussion followed regarding tree maintenance within the City and ' possibility of having the trimmings from the trees delivered to a yard where they could be distributed as firewood. Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission Page Two February 19, 1981 At this point (6:44 P.M.) enough members of the Commission were present to establish a quorum and Chairman Romero asked for a motion on the approval of the November 20, 1980 and December 18, 1980 minutes. Motion was made by Marge Stamm to approve the minutes, seconded by T. Harrell Allen with all voting aye. Motion carried. b. Inout from Advisory Commission regarding City Grapevine Newsletter Bob Rizzo, Administrative Aide, was commended by the members of the Commission on the recent issue of the City Grapevine Newsletter. Commission members suggested that future editions might also include articles helpful to new residents; i.e. how to take care of Citrus or Eucalyptus trees, type of groundcovers or plantings to put on slopes to prevent erosion, etc. Mr. Rizzo stated that he will include articles of this type in future newletters, hopefully beginning with the next issue. Mr. Rizzo reported that the next issue of the newsletter will not be mailed as an insert in the Highlander but rather as a direct mailing at a special non- profit postage rate. c. Letter of thanks to Pam Henry regarding her work and assistance with the Rancho Cucamonga Equestrian Trails. After a brief discussion regarding all the work contributed by members of the Alta Loma Riding Club regarding the Rancho Cucamonga Equestrain Trails, the following motion made made: Moved by Joe White that the City send a letter of commendation to the Alta Loma Riding Club in general, and Pam Henry and Chris Benoit in particular, for all their work and assistance with the Rancho Cucamonga Equestrian Trails. Seconded by Mary Lane and all voting aye. Motion Carried. 4. New Business Sharon Romero referred to work being done on the Flood Control project for the Demens Channel at Sapphire and Banyan and the signs that were recently erected regarding access. She stated that she thought this was an equestrian easement. Mr. Hubbs, City Engineer, replied that it is a flood control right - of way and the Flood Control District owns the land and has access. However, he noted that the District has probably obtained temporary easements for the trails behind-the Mark III homes and that he would check into it. Sharon Romero also inquired about the block walls recently built along Carnelian to deflect water, noting that several contractors from the area had told her they were not aware this was going to be done. Mr. Hubbs said that it was important that this project be completed as soon as possible and that since it was under $5,000, the City was not required to advertise and go out for bid. He stated that three letters were mailed to contractors inviting bids. Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission Page Three February 19, 1981 Mrs. Romero referred to an one hundred acre park which is shown on the Draft General Plan close to the Etiwanda area and a newspaper article that indicated that this area is not designated as a park. Bill Holley, Director of Community Services, stated that it is still an one hundred acre park and is included on the plan which the Planning Commission has forwarded to the City Council. Growth Limitation In"*_;ative Don Baer stated that residents have indicated they want lower densities than those proposed in the General Plan and that he could not sae justification -or some of the high densities. He discussed a growth limitation initiative to put the question back in the hands of the people. John Vlasic concurred with Mr. Baer and noted that he felt the people have a right to determine the size of the City. Joe White questioned the cost effectiveness of an initiative going to ballot. Discussion followed regarding the General Plan and the City's obligation to comply with State and Federal housing legislation. Chariman Romero noted that the figure for build -outs had gone up successively, except for the last number which had gone down, and questioned this. Council- man Mikels stated that these are merely theoretical numbers and pointed out the General Plan can be revised three times a year. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, discussed overall density, noting that it had actually lowered. He pointed out the General Plan process is not complete, since it has not been reviewed by City Council yet. In reply to inquiries from Commission members, Jack Lam stated the present projected popu- lation figure is approximately 140,000. Joe White reiterated his position, noting that the City Council should be given an opportunity to review the General Plan before any action on an initiative is taken. Discussion continued with each member present given the opportunity to express their viewpoint. Concern was exp•-essed by the Commission regarding whether the General Plan could be changed after it was adopted. Jack Lam replied that the option was always available to change the General Plan, provided the changes could be justified. He noted that probably at no time has the control on development ever been greater than at the present. At this point, a motion was made by John Vlasic that the Commission recommend to the City Council that it would be appropriate at this time to obtain a consensus of voter's opinion. Seconded by Don Baer. Prior to the vote on the motion, David Recupero from the William Lyon Company requested that the Commission postpone action on the initiative since the City Council had not yet approved the General Plan. He stated that Mr. Frye was willing to continue to work with residents. Rancho Cucamonga Advisory Commission. Page Four February 19, 1981 Marge Stamm noted that the initiative process would be an enormous amount of work for a few people since Alta Loma residents probably would not support it and Commission members from Cucamonga had already stated there was a lack of interest in that area. She stated she hoped they could achieve what they wanted without an initiative. Some of the Commission members stated they felt those members not present should also be given an opportunty to express their opinion on this matter. At this point the previous motion and second were withdrawn and the following new motion was made by John Vlasic: 1. A date for a special meeting of the Commission be set within the next two weeks with the issue of the initiative as the only item of discussion. 2. Request that City staff research the initiative process and give input to the Commission regarding other cities who have gone through the initiative process. 3. Request that the City Attorney give a legal description of the initiative process. Seconded by Marge Stamm. All voting aye. Motion: Carried. John Vlasic requested that staff set up the meeting and send a letter to all members of the Commission stressing the urgency and importance of attending this special meeting. Councilman Frost stated that the Commission was beginning what could be a very costly proposal as far as the City was concerned and both Councilmer. Frost and Mikels suggested the Commission first find out the City Council's position. There being no further business, motion was made by John Vlasic to adjourn and seconded by Mary Lane. Meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. to next scheduled meeting. Respectfully Submitted -un Ginny Zi tara Acting Secretary r mA��Z m Z a C A � 11°S R I I ; qz1 igitn It "S -4 "m �C y a zi ;�� =ZD HZZI �G Nl 0Z >-i� d �rn� °� A z �vam��(��� �:�M�l �p w y 3^ �Z. —�e�w oz— P 4SiS.i1 u 3 � ^e ° x G�" k ?4 � � r Z4r a lot m�g�z m Z N "�z I :l MR 0 �0 PZ A -4^ V�.O T zA z K Z p p �uRD' RZ i11 �eM Xt i 3z it x 112 \.no 1:1, t c w �4 �1 -sae e x� ft I A l a n O 0�?2 !p ?-4 9soI> C) Zm �Vi Z s; 4 P Z 77 y! 6) a IAA q *m �Zm�s =73IP ?Za�n�a•m-0 v VV i lit 311 in n0 c 75 V. N O IN bbo z� 7iiej, fn V) w ° FE 4 * =�Z ow -.A vp to 5 �Z�s�TMz Z s�c4-- ,g��N�3 �3 ti; 1� is; Vr $ R�� 1 1. v: °w��� Ic INE aim° �f��� a in � � � 2 ` g 3 IF t 4 ��� 4 rim w p s� c �» 10 }* o a n n � a�b oZO��a� *tea mj1 _ ;nE — I iK0. Ow u Q y �Y ZQ�3P �v > >jjp�m 2 16 Oz z ooh- -, `s o4:1 $C, Qy ira fa m LRz@x $ jz Irlo 10, Z IM31; 2 � v 9t 's jj�z 11 44 oth Nin z Nt jb Z ��C� � H C4 IWO fro n V v --0 Iwo MOE -� w_ �m 03 wm��� Z �AS If ZGo —��n I� Ijz i U" I t OW R ID ° 3 4gz o 24 ° $ To o� � � l ire z C4 N x10 �° P 10 � r i 4 a a n .Ry CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING January 22, 1981 Adjourned Meeting CALL TO ORDER The adjourned meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, was held in the Cucamonga Neighborhood Center, 9491 Archibald, Rancho Cucamonga, on Thursday, January 22, 1981. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Dahl who led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Jeffrey King, Herman Rempel, Jeff Sceranka, Peter Tolatoy, Richard Dahl ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None STAFF PRESENT: Barry Hogan, City Planner; Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner; Edward A. Hnpson, City Attorney; • Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; and Nancy McAllister, Secretary ANNOUNCLKENTS Barry Hogan, City Planner, stated the Interim Zoning Ordinance has been passed through second reading by the City Council with no further changes at lass night's meeting. Staff will have revised copies of the Ordinance for all Commission members within one month. He indicated the Subdivision Ordinance was also approved by the Council at last night's meeting. Mr. Hogan submitted a revised copy of Resolution No. 80 -83 setting forth recommendations for the draft General Plan relating to the Alta Loma area of Rancho Cucamonga. Mr. Hogan submitted an excerpt from the minutes of the adjourned Planning Commission meeting of December 18, 1980. He asked that the Commission review the minutes and if the Commission wishes this can be discussed tonight. Barry Hogan stated at the last meeting, the issue of wineries was discussed. Staff has submitted a memo suggesting a way in which the winery issue can be dealt with at the General Plan level and how implementation might occur. It is recommended that the Commission direct staff to include 04) the paragraph in the Sedway /Cooke General Plan Text. Mr. Hogan stated one additional memorandum regarding a proposed Planning Commission Resolution establishing a street naming policy is being • submitted to the Commission. This memorandum discusses a proposed resolution establishing a street Qaming policy. Staff will be contacting the Commission in the near future relative to the Street Naming Committee's desires. The Commission may schedule a meeting with the Street Naming Committee to discuss changes to the resolution. Mr. Hogan submitted a copy of the draft environmental impact report to each of the Commission members. This will be on the next Agenda as a discussion item. Copies will be available to the public shortly. Mr. Hogan stated staff needs some additional guidance on the property located at 4th and Archibald. He passed suggestions out to the Commission in order that the Commission may consider what 1, 1 use should be placed on this property. Secondly, in regard to the issue of Opici Winery and the relocation of the Junior High School site, staff has met with the Alta Loma School District and they have agreed to another location for this proposed school. He stated the Commission can either take action on these items tonight or continue review to the next meeting. Chairman Dahl asked that the excerpt from the December 18, 1980 adjourned meeting can be discussed at this time. Commissioner King stated he abstained from review of this item. Commissioner Sceranka stated he does not believe it was stated that the density of Hillside Residential shall be no greater than 2 units per acre. Commissioner Rrmpei stated he believes this was recommended. It was the consensus that the tape for this item be reviewed for further clarification on this item. REVIEW OF RESOLUTION NO. 80 -83 It was the consensus of the Commission that Resolution No. 80 -83 setting forth recommendations for the draft General Plan relating to the Alta Loma area of Rancho Cucamonga be approved as submitted. Barry Hogan, City Planner, asked the Commission if they would like to take action concerning the winery at this time. It was titre consensus of the Commission to add this item to the January 28, 1981 meeting. . Planning Commission Minutes -2- January 22, 1981 0 Mr. Hogan stated in regard to the Junior High School site, the school district has moved that location to Wilson Avenue, next to the elementary school site. Commissioner Sceranka stated he would like to see something from the school district indicating the criteria used to determine school sites.. Mr. Tim Beedlr, Senior Planner, stated the school districts have indicated that al', of the proposed sites are tentative locations. We can request that th:y indicate which school sites they are more certain about. It was the consensus of the Commission to ask the school district what criteria they are using to determine where a school site is placed, and that this be further discussed at the January 28th meeting. Barry Hogan asked for guidance on the property located at the corner of 4th and Archibald which was reviewed at the last ,eeting. Staff had not received clear direction at that time. Does the Commission want to see an industrial park along 4th and Archibald with residential land use in the remainder of the property? Mr. Hogan stated there is no spokesman for the property owners in this area. The Commission wanted the staff to poll the property owners to see if they would like to go together on the site. That developer wants to master plan the entire 160 acres into a residential tract. Another developer would like to develop office and another wants to see office and residential. We can not get any consensus from the property tuners. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would perscnally feel if we can get the entire 160 acres planned in some fashion, the City and the property owners would be far better off. At the corner of 4th and Archibald, he would want some commercial shown, north from that corner all the way to 6th Street be designated an office park, with the remainder of the property to the west of Archibald designated light industrial. He would also consider some high density residential in the area along the south side of 6th Street. Barry Hogan suggested that the text state that the area bounded by 4th and 6th Streets, Archibald and Hellman be master planned as an entire unit. Then what you have to do is designate on the map what you want. In this way development does not have to be considered until the entire area is master planned. He stated staff can bring this matter up at the January 28th meeting and submit examples of what he has described. It was the corsensus of the Commission that this item be continued to the meeting of January 28, 1981 in order that the staff may submit some alternatives and examples for subject area. 0 Planning Commission Minutes -3- January 22, 1981 UN 100 LNAP11 E-6VIR SUPER ELEMENT Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, reviewed a slide presentation and the staff report. Staff recommends that the Commission review the Draft Environmental Resource Super Element with all revisions and, if found satisfactory, adopt the element as revised. Commissioner Dahl stated one of the statements made by Mrs. Romero at the last meeting was that she would like to see plants that help perpetuate wildlife. This would include plants with nuts and berries. Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the audience, Chairman Dahl closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Rempel and seconded by Commissioner Sceranka to approve the Draft Environmental Resource Super Element subject to the following amerdments: 1. Page 204, 1st paragraph, 3rd sentence shoui� read: "The City, through its comments should ind-cate that it is the City's policy to maintain the area north of the present City limits predominantly in open space with limited development potential in areas where environmental constraints are significant. Any development approved in this aroa should be responsible to the natural resources." (Note: The word "not" was removed from the sentence). 2. Page 184, Table IV -2, under native groundcover, a statement should be added that s-..ne thought or consideration should be given to fire resistant plants. 3. A statement should be added that plants be included that will help perpetuate wildlife. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANKA, KING, TOLSTOY, DAHL NUES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE THE PUBLIC HEALTH Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report and slide presentation for the Commission. Commissioner Rempel stated there is a grammatical error on page 220, the staff correction should read: "This hazard with lateral ground movement is the primary cause for the collapse of buildings." Planning Commission Minutes -4- January 22, 1981 • 0 Commissioner Tolstoy asked if a section has been added about winds. Tim Beedle stated policies on wind were added on page 262 and 263. Commissioner Tolstoy stated quite often a developer is not aware of the fact of intense wind. He should be made aware of this at the time of design review. The garage doors, if possible, shouldn't be on the north side of the property, as he has seen people try to open their garage doors during the intense winds and have had them slam down on them. It might be suggested in these cases that the buildings be rotated in some way. Mr. Hogan stated this could be done through the Design Review Committee. Commissioner Sceranka stated there should be some way to designate landscaping should be specially designed to with•tand the wind. Barry Hogan stated this has been taken care of through the city's landscape standards. It requires double lodge pole stakes on all street trees. Chairman Dahl asked why the statement that there has been an increase of burglaries after incorporation (in part due to greater reporting of crimes) has been included in the text on page 258 (crime prevention). Commissioner Rempel stated it would be best to delete both paragraphs regarding crime, as they add nothing to the text. ® Commissioner Sceranka stated on page 264, Regulatory, the word "mandatory" under Mandatory Planned Unit Development should be deleted. Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the audience, Chairman Dahl closed the public hearing. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Rempel and seconded by Commissioner Sceranka to adopt the Public Health and Safety Super Element subject to the changes as indicated above. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, S[ KING, TOLSTOY, DAHL NOES: COKMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE 8:00 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:15 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. 0 Planning Commission Minutes -5- January 22, 1981 REVIFW AND DISCUSSION OF DRAYT COMMUNITY DESIGN ELEMENT Barre Hogan, City Planner, reviewed the slide presentation and report on the draft Community Deslgn.Element. Commissir :er Tolstoy stated this is a very important part of our General Plan • there are'some things which the General Plan should address in order' l., identify the three communities (Alta Loma, Cucamonga and Etiwanda). It has been said there should be features in the communities that when you drive into one of the areas you would know right off that you are not in the Cl.ty of Upland or the City of Fontana. There should be a distinctive street design and possibly many other features. He is really sorry that this element does not speak of the identity of the three communities and street design in a better fashion. Commissioner Sceranka stated special landscape standards should be established along Foothill Boulevard. Mr. Hogan stated the community design element is not a required element of the General Plan. If the Commission feels strongly about the inadequacy of this document, it could be removed from the General Plan and could be reworked. Commissioner Tolstoy stated this element should not be deleted at this time as there are some very good points in the text. Mr. Hogan stated the Commission could direct staff to go back and try to put in some of the more obvious things. Staff does not have the time to give this all the attention it deserves at this point but could come back to you again at a later date and amend the element. Commissioner Dahl stated a statement should be added to the text that the natural and manmade environment of Rancho Cucamonga shall be designed and coordinated to establish the identity of the City as a single entity while also preserving the individe•al significance of the older villages, to improve the image and appearance, and to promote the functional efficiency of the City. Commnissioner Rempel stated on page 128, Base Line should be included in the list of streets. Travel routes should be clarified to state that it would be really great that Foothill, Haven and Base Line be so designed with landscaping and meandering sidewalks so that when people pass through they will want to get out of their vehicles and walk a while on the st- i-eet. If we could develop the streets in such a way that people will want to walk up and down them, we will have something. Commissioner Sceranka stated he would agree. What will make our City different form the rest of the communities is how we allow open space to be transferred from vacant fields with orchards and vineyards to set- backs, variable set -backs and cluster development with characteristic type of screening and planting. Those kinds of characteristics are going to make the city something unique. is Planning Commission Minutes -6- January 22, 1981 Commissioner Tolstoy stated the view of the mountains is also �r asset. We should make a concerted effort to not block that view. Commissioner Rempel stated on page 125, the middle illustration is atrocious and should be deleted. Commissioner Dahl Stated on page 129, he is totally opposed to a regimantalized appearance along Haven Avenue. Commissioner Sceranka stated we need to take a look at the industrial area of the City for the proper place for urban identities. He would agree that it would not be appropriate to have canopy type trees on the north -south streets as they will block the view of the mountains. Mr. Hogan stated in the landscaped areas, if native grasses of the area are used with perhaps areas of ground without cover, it would give more of a country theme and naturalized landscaping. The north /south streets could have more vertical trees. Commissioner Sceranka stated in regard to streetscape and median islands, he has a problem with median islands themselves. The maintenance factor is significant and we are wasting a lot of water in the way they are designed. He does not want to see this City perpetuate median islands that Llinuse a resource such as water. Mr. Hogan stated some of the characteristics and specific designs for median islands should be included in the General Plan.element. Staff can work on this and come back to the Commission with the specifics. Commissioner Rempel stated on page 126, the statement, the design of public transit network, etc., to minimize... He stated he would use the word reduce instead of ninimizc. A period should be placed after transportation, the rest of the sentence should be eliminated. Commissioner Sceranka stated the entire sentence has nothing to do with that policy and could be eliminated. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he would hope the Design Review Committee will use this element as a text book. Commissioner Sceranka asked if Victoria is the only collector street that has been designated as special boulevard. Mr. Hogan stated at this time it is; however, there may be some other streets that might be added after the Etiwanda area is reviewed. It has been suggested that Rochester, Church or Miller also be shown as special boulevards. Victoria can be dealt with through other means and if the Commission is comfortable with deleting Victoria as a special boulevard, staff would have no problem with that. He would suggest that no decisions regarding this be made at this time until after review has been made of the Etiwanda area. 0 Planning Commission Minutes -7- January 22, 1981 Commissioner Sceranka stated on page 145, the second policy states the surrounding area should be developed in a way that minimizes impact in the North Town Area and is harmonious with its physical form. He is not sure whether this statement should be reworded or left in the text. Mr. Hogan stated this will be reworded. Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. Mr. Doug Hone stated he met with Lloyd Michael from the Water District a number of years ago about basin water preservation and planning. We are one of the few cities in the entire Southern California area that is somewhere within reason on its drafting of water out of the basin. For every ten parts of water used in San Diego County, none parts are imported. In this area, nine parts of water are used and maybe on occasion we use one part from MWD. We really have a unique opportunity in this General Plan to balance our landscaping objectives with our water capabilities. Some of the older homes in the City are very beautiful and what he would call "individual ". He would like to see consideration given to placing the words "individual initiative" into the design standards as these two words mean a lot, as it gives the idea that individual creativity can be used. Commissioners Dahl and Tolstoy stated they would agree with Mr. Hones' sthtements. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he doesn't know of many places in Southern California that have the basins that we have. Perhaps the General Plan should address this, as this needs to be preserved in this community. Tim Beedle stated the environmental resource element does discuss the basins. Commissioner Sceranka stated he doesn't like to see parkways sprinklered and 90% of the eater carried out into the gutters. Also, when it rains all the water runs into the street. We should retain as much of the water as possible. Mr. Gary Frye stated if canopy trees are used on the east /west streets and columnar trees on the north /south streets, the view of the mountains can be retained. He further stated he does not understand the statement on page 127 of the text which states that Etiwanda Avenue is a secondary street. Mr. Hogan stated this needs to be reviewed in more detail. Mr. Frye stated he would like to add that he hopes the City is in agreement that trees are an important part of the City's image. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Dahl closed the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -8- January 22, 1981 • Commissioner Sceranka stated on page 146, the second policy states ® centers should be designed. It should be more clearly stated as to what kind of centers we are talking about. He totally disagrees with the first item under the policy, as he doesn't necessarily want to make this community urban. Mr. Hogan stated staff will rework these policies. Commissioner Sceranka stated on page 147, neighborhoods and sub- areas, he is not sure that schools should be located near shopping centers. This should be deleted. Also, on page 1470 he does not understand the third item from the bottom of the page. Mr. Hogan stated staff will take a closer look at this. He stated staff intends to make the corrections as indicated by the Commission this evening and bring the element back to the Commission at their meeting next Monday night. At that time, it would either require snottier special meeting to take action on the items or if the Commission is comfortable with the changes, this could be placed on the February 2nd Agenda. It was the consensus of the Commission to bring this element back to the next General Plan meeting for further review. 9:25 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. e9:35 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. , REVIEW AND DISCUSSION ON DRAFT ENERGY CONSERVATION ELEMENT Tim Beedle, City Planner, reviewed a slide presentation and staff report. He recommended that the Commission adequately evaluate and discuss the Draft Energy Conservation Element objectives and policies so that staff might be able to obtain insight into potential recommendations to be brought back at the January 27, 1981 meeting. Commissioner Tolstoy stated more graphics are needed, in this element. Barry Hogan stated staff will add additional graphics as suggested. c Commissieiier Rempel stated there are some areas that need to be reworded. He doesn't think this 0 ty is ever going to be self- sustaining in energy. That statement should be removed. Commissioner Sceranka stated tht energy conservation element should review the effects of street widti:9 and landscaping as well as possibly more specific discussions that could recommend or promote building projects within the City. 40 Planning Commission Minutes -9- January 22, 1981 Mr. Beedle stated this community, having a large undeveloped area, really has an opportunity to do something unique in terms of energy conservation in the industrial area. Commissioner Sceranka stated the industrial area of the City would be the most economical place to have solar heating and cooling systems. Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. Mr. Doug Hone stated this element could have a reference for ongoing changes and should possibly go as far as to establish some type of Solar Committee with Chaffey College. They have quite a good start in solar technology and might encourage more community participation in that effort. Commissioner Sceranka agreed that Chaffey College does have a complete solar program and they have done a tremendous amount of work in this regard. There being no further comments from the audience, Chairman Dahl closed the public hearing. Chairman Dahl stated there ought to be a way within our General Plan text that can address ongoing changes, as every day there seems to be new changes and concepts taking place. We can automatically update this in this way. Commissioner Sceranka stated he would also agree that an Advisory • Committee to the City with a member of the college solar class be considered to keep the City updated as to any new advancements in regard to solar energy. There are also solar manufacturing plants within the city which could provide valuable expertise in this regard. It was the concensus of the Commission that the above - mentioned changes be made by Staff and resubmitted for Commission consideration at their meeting of January 26, 1981. Motion: Moved by Commissioner Tolstoy, seconded by Commissioner Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adjourn. 10:10 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -10- January 22, 1981 March 24 1981 To: The Pl4nning C mmiss.o Re: Tenative Trac N 10035' Being a homeowner �s- rFonerty aff - opting the tenative tract no. 10035 I have certain ^... concerns with the nrorosed project. Unfortunately other responsibilities make it impossible for me to attend the me( ing Shen the project will be discussed and I must therefore submit these concerns in fritting, I am concerned with the following: 1 Grading in the area; With no a ecific grading indicated it is diffi.:ult to discuss the impact on the nre -Ae however, a: can be seen from the topography, extensive grading will be required to set both strw improvements and home pads. The effect of this gr -ding on nstural water flow need to be thorcughl3 -:r investigated pricy to approval and specific grading for street and homesite looked into. Furthermore, backfilling In areas indicated will be extersire and could contribute to major rune 'f and flooding problems. 2 Noise and vibration le -•els; Tie report concludes that there will be no major increase in noise and vibration 1, eels. However, by changing Camind Praderm from a de -dend street into a through str- et will cause an increased traffic flow and thus increase noise and vibrationAeve s. Presently there is no traffic in :he project area The increased traffic flow rill also effect the health and safety of the residents in the -Area surrounding the proposed project. These should is investigated prior to annorval 3 Since this is a custom lot subiivision no indication of the type or placement of a home on a lot is indicated. It :a impossible, therefore, to determine what effect any individurl improvement will ha re on view azd properly value. Furthermore, since this is a custom lot no further pudic input can be made on this issue. If thir, nro.ject is anni-oved it should incl) de a resident review of hmeae nLmstru :tion wh Leh night effect their lots. 4 My nronerty prosently drains into th.e project Area and any ir_�prcvveme it to proposed Tot 23 could dversly effect. this drAinAge, Infaet the whole water flc r pattern in Ore proposed arec is extensive dad varied arA should be studied •pith so ihasia on how en;; proposed in*+rovemerts might adversly effect it, 5 Because of the varied and extreme topography of the area more precis a and detailed Pr ^din^ nrono9al should be made, Lrcluded in these proposals should be grading not only for the proposed project (rtreA and subdivision) but also allowat Le home site pr -din, -nd their effects on surfs<e and subsurface drainage. Un'ii. theme cincernz are addre4aed •necifically, I would suggest that tie Commisson n ,)t. el prove thirz nroiect Particularly questions concerning drainage and traffic flort1qafety nu-t be znawered I would also suggest that the City rege :re the develoner: to pre4ent a com -late environaental imr3ct report on the complete project ,including home buiadinp) prior to approval. Rennectrkftl —t.3Wed Edward Clark £747 C-lle Coraxon J0 WILLIAM I.YON"1m and 9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K, RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA 91730 • 171,. 40 -2244 March 25, 1981 city of gaucho (ticamonga Planning Cammission P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Request for continuance Dear Sirs: We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing from March 26, 1981 to April 2, 1981. This continuance allows the staff and Planning CommLssion members ade- quate time to rev; v changes made to the Pl.omwd .comamity 2text8to conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing April GF /kj cc: Jack L;.a/ Barry r'-)6m Sincerely REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT \ 9%'LVILLIAM LYON nY�y 9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K. RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 • (7141 980-2244 March 25, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 SubjecC: Request for Continuance Tear Sirs: We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing frcm March 26, 1981 to April 29 1981. This continua a allows the staff and Planning Ccmmissioon members ade- quate time to review changes made to the Planned Community text to conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing on April 2, 1981. +F/ ri cc: Jack Lanz Barry Mogan ✓ REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ,70 WILLIAM LYON';6vny%=/ 9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 • (714) 980 -2244 March 25, 1981 City of Rancho Cucaannga Planning Cammission P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Qr monga, CA 91730 Subject: Request for Continuance Dear Sirs: We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing from March 26, 1981 to April 2, 1981. This continuance allows the staff and Planning Commission members ade- quate time to review changes made to the Planned Cam inity text to conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing on April 2, 1981. GF/kj cc: Jack Im Barry Hogan Sincerely QRegi! tiager rz, C0411UFRN p r 1 , UNIrY0f41 P� AR `VFIO "(4 A 2 T A J 718191101/1112 1� .9l ���3i4 Pd1 REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT 90 WILLIs -M LYON9�ml&xj 9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 • (7141 980-2244 March 25, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Request for Continuance Dear Sirs: We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing from March 26, 1981 to April 2, 1981. This continuance allows the staff and Planning Cc mission members ade- quate time to review changes made to the Planned Ccmmity text to conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing on April 2, 1981. GF /kj cc: Jack Lan, Barry Hogan Sincerely R I1*0 ger C/T y 11, 1 (. r CO�iMONI 0�ll ilZ� Z i 2i 3(gU Q f iS ppf pN T2 l , NT 7 �81g1 ld p� 2 5 138 Sl REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ,OtiVILLIAM LYON�4m/�W7 9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 City of Rancho Cuca>mnga Planning Commission P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Request for Continuance Dear Sirs: 17141 980 -2244 March 25, 1981 We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing from March 26, 1981 to April 2, 1981. This continuance allows the staff and Planning Commission members ade- quate time to review dm ges made to the Planned Community text to conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing on April 2, 1981. G',Ikj cc: Jack Lam Barry Hogan Sincerely C!T y Uf" " COM�ONI ,yp RAMC CAM 7 rlgh, J lgg� T D pT%i 8�g110 1111212 �j3i4 p it X516 REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT •�FZWILLIAM LYON'��,W 9613 ARROW HIGKWAY, SUITE K, RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CA 91730 • 17141 980-2244 March 25, 1981 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Request for Continuance Dear Sirs: We concur with the staff's request to continue the Victoria hearing from March 26, 1981 to April 2, 1981. This continuance allows the staff and Planning Commission members ade- quate time ro review changes made to the Planned Ccmunity text to conform to the revised plan prior to the hearing on April 2, 1981. GF/ __j cc: Jack Lam Barry Hogan J crTyor``r�� 10MrwoNI RANCHO D YQ f!0P , CAMON AM `'IAi� 2 MfNT p fPr�) 19 7i8i9, 10�i1�12 81 ! r�i3f 4iS 8 REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ii it Cl -1 1-1 ii t_ "1 !1 "1 1 ! I !1 1 I • DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY GF RANUiO CL;CAMQNGA MFF REPORT March 25, 1981 Planning Commission Barry K. Hogan, City Planner Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 81 -10 - SCHLOSSER - The development of a 21,600 sq. ft. industrial warehouse addition to the existing Schlosser Forge on 3 acres of land in the M-2 zone located at 11711 Arrow Route APN 229 - 111 -18 BACKGROUND: This review is for Environmental Assessment to determine any significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. The site and architectural design is not considered unless it is related to environmental concerns. To determine significant adverse impacts an Initial Cttidy on environmental concerns is prepared. Upon completion of that study, evidence would indicate either no significant adverse impacts or the potential for significant impacts. If a deter- mination of no significant impacts is made, based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration may be issued for the project. If signifi- cant impacts are found, then an Environmental Impact Report shall be required to fully analyze the impacts of the project. The detailed site plan and elevations will be reviewed and approved with conditions by the Planning Division subject to approval of the Negative Declaration. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING: The applicant is proposing'to construct a 21,600 sq. ft. building for the storage of raw materials on 3 acres of land located on the south side of Arrow Route, west of Rochester Avenue. The following is the adjacent land use and zoning of this site. LAND USE ZONING North Vacant M -1 South Vacant M -2 East Vacant 11 -2 West Vacant M -2 The subject property is presently zoned M -2 and is designated major industry on the Interim General Plan and General Industrial /Rail Served on the Draft General Plan. This project is part of the expansion plans for the Schlosser Forge operation. ITEM A l CJ 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Raw Material Warehouse APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Phillip D. Schlosser 11711 Arrow Route, Cucamonga 987 -4760 NAME, ADDRESS, CONCERNING THI S 11711 Arrow Rc TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED PROJECT: Albert W. Holguin LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 11711 Arrow Route, Cucamonga LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Y -! OR 81 -10 Staff Report -2- 3 -25 -81 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study has been com- pleted by the applicant and is attached for your review and consider- ation. Staff has completed Part H of the Environmental Assessment and has round no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with such findings, then a Negative Declaration would be in order. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon analysis of the initial Study, it appears that the project will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment. If the Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Nega- tive Declaration for the project would be 'n order. Res6ectful�y sybmitted, BKH:DC:cd Attachments: Part I Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial Study "A" - Locatior. Map - Site Plan - Elevations E • • PROJECT DESCR ?PTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Raw Material Warehouse -Steel Structure - 60 feet wide 20 feet bigbby 160 feet long ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 21,600 square feet DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON*RrNTAI, SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Abandon vineyard surrounded by existing manufacturing buildings. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series, of cumulative actions, which although: individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? None x- 2 n LJ C WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? .X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x S: Remove any existing trees? How many? _ x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involver, the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 2 -19 -81 Signature AG ) Title Senior Vice President I - -3 n 1 !i.!i 1 ! I E CITY OF ® RA\CHO CUUMVIONGA PLANNING DIVISION C V NORTH ITEM: 091 sloplo _ TITLE: 511E- E\HIBIT: — —SCAU -- "" i I a 1 -.:i: '1 -. -, - w /Gear �.•, . -2it w ..t s . Au" mrc +� •� •SAW fY1R � TZ 01n(J Mrtt Afbae � � J rma JJ i I III I IYfAgw ,. ,• , II w �.WJ Raw "MOM MMvtwllr L07 LSD 1 E uwaw .. I I 11(I l I I I I I I I U11L1111 _ f ICI _! Me- w•. IRILLY40K0 IRl/ � �T / ',LOT ti Tr w.0 No SW 001two + . ` - !, 1% / / /// / / / / /ail /�1U11 r - -: . � • •, r.`- • •aumlr a+ Iwr M+lu.._. •r i . �:.'�i,�. L' a.0 ;:.'s:' .., ...,: .. _ ... ;� }s :` ... _ .. ...... _ CITY OF ® RA\CHO CUUMVIONGA PLANNING DIVISION C V NORTH ITEM: 091 sloplo _ TITLE: 511E- E\HIBIT: — —SCAU -- "" i I AL r.enyy�) ire .. CITY OF RAI'CHO CL'CAi�IO \'Gjk PLANNING DIVISION r�ww+rrwr i V V NORTH 0 ITE\1: _ �� r 81 "(a TITLE: _ ELeVAT ON ty • EXHIBIT: G ..SCALE • DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY OF RANCHO CL'CA,..JNGA pG�Icn.H�� STAFF REPORTS °� LL 0 Y ' f U March 11, 1981 1977 Planning Commission Barry K. Hogan, City Planner 4y Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner AL McDANIEL - A total resiaentiai oeveiop into 33 lots in the R -1 zone generally northeast corner of Ramona and Church ent of 9.76 acres located on the APN 208 - 181 -06 BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval of a 9.16 acre resi- dential subdivision located on the northeast corner of Ramona and Church (Exhibit "A "). The site is presently zoned R -1, with an existing single family residence on the corner. The site is presently being farmed for citrus. Several stands of Eucalyptus exist around the perimeter of the site. The Interim General Plan indicates low density residential (2 to 5 units per acre), and the Proposed General Plan indicates lore density residential (2 to 4 units per acre). Surrounding properties are similarly developed with single family residential subdivisions. The proposal has been reviewed as a total development package by the Growth Management and Design Review Committees in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance, and received a point rating which exceeds the required threshold of 68 points, and the project is therefore, eligible for consider- ation by the Planning Commission. The conceptual grading plan (Exhibit "C "), for the tentative map has also been reviewed by the Grading Committee, and received approval in concept only. ANALYSIS: The tract map, as shown on Exhibit "B ", has been prepared in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act and the City Subdivision Ordinance. All structures have been sited in accordance with the code setback requirements. Accesr, to the tract is being provided by a new street from Church Street that will link -up with the existing southerly extension .of Teak Way. Thus providing two means of access. The proposed street system has been designed to accommodate future subdivision of that portion of the site containing the existing single family residences as shown in Exhibit "E ". The development is proposing construction of a slumpstone wall with redwood panel inserts, an alluvial rock parkway and street trees along Church Street from the easterly boundary to the proposed street into the project (Exhibit "D "). This landscaping would become part of a City land- scape maintenance district. It is also recommended that landscaping and fencing be provided , and included in the maintenance district on the east street side of Lot 8. ITEM B' TT 10.116 Staff Report -2-. March 11, 1981 The Design Review Committee was not satisfied with the location of the d,Aveway and garage on Lot 9, and recommended that the driveway and garage be relocated to front on Yew Street. Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion of the Initial Study, no significant adverse impacts were found as a result of this pre;2ct. The issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the Commis- sion concurs. CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was advertised in the Daily Report newspaper. In addition, approximately 96 public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no oral or written communication has been received regarding this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input on this project. If, after such consideration, titq Commission concurs with the findings and condi- tions recommended by Staff, then the adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions would be appropriate. ,ted, Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Lrndscaping Exhibit "E" - Future Subdivision Study Exhibit "F" "I" - Elevations Part I, Initial Study Resolution of Approval Conditions of Approval 0 • i S N 111 inq IRS :.... I�IY�� :ij ■ r� ping oil mass CITY OF ITE.w: "Ti 10 31 ® RANCHO CUCANIONCYA TITLEJ - OCAMON 'MAR PLANNING QIVISON EXHIBIT :_ SCALE: I A� 1 = o 1 �' s Z i • —; CL W O = ' �l i 1r f £ ��f Ali Ic�'L `! j a vn all pq I 2-2- LI i I It St 1 ^� i 'cr � i ;~ ` � I � �' `` i \� •I I i r4 0 JF !� 'II •l: �� 1' 1 •i � tl � G ice. n/ 1 1 7 � nn I I -1�V II . uli , N1` .� 1 , •Ili �. .,' . i, I L ; : � •.•' ' r,.t I �I�I i� ^�i rllill,:a ih ;� i �'� �� II +I✓.I:s. JF !� 'II •l: �� 1' 1 •i � tl � G ice. n/ 1 1 7 � nn I I -1�V II . uli , N1` R 111.]iii.�I G %ikl. x'717 I { , i 1 6 { t t { ' 1 0 t r � tl u4 h Z •v ao j Q 4 J A � - t {iLEi !�1 \i 1 1 r, 't Y� Li F 1 ;tl •I• i' x I —� -- _:1� •_ I� ;,- V Y a ,j If of; I w • jjI m \ lI � u rl �\� , 1 1 x..11 � r.:�ll .� ''��` /' \� �/ •�' 1 ;I . .. _ • .�. .✓ . 1 �- . 1. � 'i w I 111~'+' V ,1 ry -.� 1 1 ate- •>\ - -.I .4 .{ ji t_ ^� i. 1' y _ ( f) 11`r � `1 1 • `1 I rv. w. wl '- :1111 _ - - _• __� �! �_.- 11��.. -�� � `� //. �.— III- t 1� _I r•l� _ , 1 � � - — 1 111 1 � r— «_. � r'a t '/- 1 I_ Imo_ "i • / �: 1i i� i Al I• � 1 r I 1 - it \ III 1 Iti � 1 1 I I I•^j � 1 ' I �\ / •`'. ,1 I ..y I - �1 1I "I I, I I� I i� \ = 1 y � I J 1 • h . I 1 - •1� I '.h _y 1111111 •� . �I A , 1 Bo R 111.]iii.�I G %ikl. x'717 I { , i 1 6 { t t { ' 1 0 t r � tl u4 h Z •v ao j Q 4 J A � - t {iLEi !�1 \i 1 1 r, 't Y� Li F 1 ;tl •I• i' x I —� -- _:1� •_ I� ;,- V Y a ,j If of; I w • jjI m \ lI � u rl �\� , 1 1 x..11 � r.:�ll .� ''��` /' \� �/ •�' 1 ;I . .. _ • .�. .✓ . 1 �- . 1. � 'i w I 111~'+' V ,1 ry -.� 1 1 ate- •>\ - -.I .4 .{ ji t_ ^� i. 1' y _ ( f) 11`r � `1 1 • `1 I rv. w. wl '- :1111 _ - - _• __� �! �_.- 11��.. -�� � `� //. �.— III- t 1� _I r•l� _ , 1 � � - — 1 111 1 � r— «_. � r'a t '/- 1 I_ Imo_ "i • / �: 1i i� i Al I• � 1 r I 1 - it \ III 1 Iti � 1 1 I I I•^j � 1 ' I �\ / •`'. ,1 I ..y I - �1 1I "I I, I I� I i� \ = 1 y � I J 1 • h . I 1 - •1� I '.h _y 1111111 •� . �I A , 1 C I ry 7 er i 44 O Q Hy ae F 17:j3 /WO � y O r L' 3 I r is {-; - Y {J JI 1 I I -' I ♦hs t _ J J OL 4) I� • I ry 7 er i 44 O Q Hy ae F 17:j3 /WO r L' 3 I r is {-; - Y {J JI 1 I I -' I ♦hs t _ J J OL 4) I� • • 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANNIONGA PLANNING DIVISM V �I NORTH ITEM: I 2316 _ TITLE: 5050051W ��_� EXI IIBIT: e SCALE: 1 i �,�4l9!Il19��7 Ll Lf L, Ell I 10 jig it Z> (LW � • C 77i r I,,L C I a s El $A I I • CI 0 r E Jf� �i <J3 Or ti I� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.O*iGA INITIAL STUD`_' PART I — PRofrCT INFORMATION SHEET — Tv be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: TRACT NO 10316 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: (714) 984 2414 Dell M_ Mv, Daniel Tnn 1013 Beaonia Avenue On a io 91762 na_ NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: nel_1 M-nnniPl or Gary Mnnaniol 1013 Begonia Avenue Ontario 91762 Tel (714) 984 2414 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Northeast corner Ramona Avenue and Church Street= _ Assessor No 208 181 06 LIST OT11ER PEiLMTTS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATF•. AND FEDERII, AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: C R f n F1 nnH rnnFrnl ni c+ri ri- r1wamnnna (Irvin *v Wn+,P n' % I -1 ;W'r tU NEVV70N, INC SURPEYINC 674 WESr 1 SFeEEF ON!"") rgUF 91762 "4 rrl:; i°M V01 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Consr.ruction of 33 Single Family rpci.tipnrpc ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXIPTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Total Acreage 9.76 Acres Includes lot'21 which w— ill remain intact.- Existing building 4,000 So Ft +- DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONINIM1TAL SETV NG OF THE PROJECT. SITE INCLUDING INFORMUMON ON TOPOGRALPFly, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIPIALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL, OR SCENIC ASPECTS;, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION Ot ,..7Y . EXISTIP:G STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Site Presently a bearing citrus grove surrouiiddd by eucal tus trees serving as a wind break. Propose rac is surrounded on all sides by singe ami y rest ences. • —There are no cultural, historical or scenic aspects_ Existing structure on lot 21 is a single family residence. A garage is located on the Past side of lot 21. These structures are to remain_ Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions', which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? —ahiG i a complete oroiect. It will not havp nnv significa 0 x- z 1 impact. ET , TI IIS PIIQJr :T: YES NO _ x 1. Create a substantial change ii ground contours? x 2. Create a substantial change ii existing noise or vibration? x 3. Create a substantial change i:i demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)., _ x 4. Create changes in the existingf zoning ur general plan designations? x 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? 950 + - x 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materia:.s such as toxic substances, flammables car explosiv -s? Explanation cf any YES answers above: The existing citrus trees will have to be rem-)ved. The eucalyptus trees will have to be removed or topped for safety reasons. IMPOP.TaNT: If :he project involves the construction of res- dential units, complete the form on the next. page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements :'urnished above and is the attached exhibits present the data and informat.ton required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information pres±nted are true and correct tc the best of my knowledge and belief. I further unoerstan3 that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evauuation can be made by _he Devolo�nenc Revic%a Corimittee. Date Signature J� Title 's rc 5 Z3 .. RESIDENTIAL CONSTP.0 TION The folIOWing information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: DELL M. MCDANIEL INC TR: 10316 Specific Location of Project: Northeast corner Church Street and Ramona P.c PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PIMSr 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: ,33 33 2. Number of multiple family units: 0 Dete proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model 4 and r Of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Ranve /3ci 8 Svo /S71 '1,Yr 9-�- Sz7 0 M1i? l .- 4 I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE °LANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10316. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10316, hereinafter "Map" s6bmitted by Deli McDaniel, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 9.76 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Church Street and Ramona Avenue into 33 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 11, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions I ^eports; and WHEREAS, the.• Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10316 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The desigr or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specifi: plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the su`)division is not likely to caul- substantial environmental damage and cxr; idable inju *y to humans and wildlife or i.�eir hab=.tat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serioas public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property ;within the proposed subdivision. e Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a h..legative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10316, a copy of.which -is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: 1. Installation of storm drain on tract boundary to Church Street required. Ramona Avenue frog north storm drain shall be 2. All existing easements lying within the future right - of -way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 3. All perimeter landscaped parkways are required to be annexed into the landscape maintenance district. 4. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed on public right -of -way on the perimeter of this tract area shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City and annexed into the landscape maintenance district. 5. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 7. Additional wood trim and architectural treatment shall be provided on side street yard elevations. 8. The driveway and garage on lot 9 shall be relocated to face the north property line on Yew Street. 9. That detailed elevations and landscaping plans shall be submitted for fencing and planting to occur on the east side of lot 8. Said landscaping shall become part of a maintenance district. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl,, Chairman E ILJ Resolution No. Page 3 ATTEST Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of March, 1961 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 111,:,' 1 C DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS AOF'ri aaa.a mwA /G 'lob A i 4� I t\ I ! Subject: Applican' Location Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE 141TH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. �4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 4e 5. ,Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings aro 1:0 be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill — — Fire D:str -c tp as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the. Fire Chief a A Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. I.00�9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. 10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conaitions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. C (... 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. _ 12. A'1 swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans hall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 17. Solid core exteriur doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation double paned windows, extended iverhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. 2. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. _ 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance di.stri.ct for maintenance of equestrian trails. E 11 11 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. B. -.Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size, 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. - Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum _Z4 of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. _ 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the finel grading plan. 3. Eucalyptu wherever be trees shall be approve ed for rein e Master the tPlan of Existing On-Site Planning Di Trees. trees which are approved for removal may be required t� be replaced on a tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. 4 accordanceewith theiMaster Plan of street treesrfor�theaCityeofnRanchod in Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20 on exterior streets. 5, A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, sha'l be provided within the development.; 206 -24" box or larger, 70 %-15 gallon, and 10° % -5 gallon. 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and with slope planting a requirements ofa the cCity of d Rancho�Cucamonga�or5ucheslope an planting shall include t :t riot bbelli itedlto rootand9irr'igationrShall Such appropriate shrubs and trees. be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied yathe Buser. Prior to releasing occupancy for shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfa ;tes shall ycondiion.eded with c l native grasses upon � completionoflgrading such slop control or an alternati a method ferosion subdivisionssshallrbe provideditoln9 germinate the seed and to a print 6 months after germination. g. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a pr ofhofemaintenancecshallnbersubmittedato the eCityiprior tto issyuch a^ce of building pern +its. appropriate 9. The front yard landscaping, and an irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscapiandanhall sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 11. A minim:am of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, specirnan size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along D. Signs C C 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. _ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) at ® which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot ' , Tract ' on ; I have read the C.C. & R.'s and er undstand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. __/6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. _ '. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. 8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. S. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is --' required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DI4ISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development �1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. �2. Prior tc issuance of building permits -Fnr combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. �3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. 0 _ 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. _ B. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances ` considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Grading �1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the ® approved conceptual grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPL?ANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access -Z 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tei,tative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: _ � 9 additional feet on " 14%- additional feet on_4,e�A additional feet on C _/3. Corner property line radius will be required per C;ty standards. _± 4. All right of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: (_�;T "P C2 / fee( 7_ MA 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J_ Street Improvements —/1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. SID'_- PVMT. b1ALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER ® Avo j*0 '0'0e 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 5. Surety shall be posted and ar, agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. 0 K. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City'Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4, A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures b diverting sheet runoff to street. rr� . ® 5{ellp - t trs shall be designed asonajor water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb height�, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood prbtection wails, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities --*Oer1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. —Z 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. /4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. Water and s :•er system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet --Z5. requirement= of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. d S. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested �v agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any I requirements that may be received from them. M. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: B. County DUST; Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading perm it) C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District �; D. Other: _ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. 4/3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention tc form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. Z4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. L E Ell CITY OF RtsNCHO Ct1CA MONGA 9FAF1L' REPORT, DATE: March 25, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11608 - L & G LIMITED - A total development of 8.31 acres into 2 lots comprising 120 condominium unit; in the southeast comer of Arr_;iibald and Victoria - APN 202 - 181 -07 BACKGROUND: This tract was originally presentec to the Planning Com- mission at their meet -Ing of February 25, 1981. Tie Planning Commission continued review of the project for further consi(eration of the visitor parking areas and interior pedestrian circulation by the Design Review Committee. The Design Review Committee has met w*th the applicant and architect and feel as though they have resolved tie Commissions concerns. Please find attached as Exhibit "A" a revised site plan indicating the pedestrian circulation system on the interior of the project which is proposed to be designated with architecturally treated concrete paving. The Design Review Committee also discussed the distribution and lucation of visitor parking areas. The Committee felt that the visitor parking areas, as presently proposed, is adequate and that any additional alter- ations to the location of visitor parking areas world create substantial revisions to the project which they felt were not iiarranted since the development does meet the required visitor parking requirements. Please find attached a copy of the Staff Report of February 25, 1981 in which the proposed conditions of approval are ccntained. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planring Commission conduct a public hearing to consider and review all aspects of the project. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, if the Commission desires to approve the tract then it would be appropriate to adopt the attached Resolution with the proposed conditions of approval. tfull.V spVmitted, BKH :MV:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Revised Site Plan Planning Commission Staff Report of 2 -25 -81 & attachments ITEM C t �• q . I r, t f }+ + �r .��r � � n r r , 1 .1.,, • � i. fr � +. t7 1 l , 1 r • ,�� r 11. 5. t 1 T .•. � ••.L 4•, f ICi 1 _ j • r mnw c.. ' r .�t o /vc•—�i ANA G, It SUN y�g - +li 6'Zw ►.� 1 O OJT + �a t fo 6 yjy O !Itli W. ��NO Rj ilS4j' �� 1'V �.O 'e ?.: ►?-� . IT Ae Ce La Igla �%�Ify c�j�1t ° 4, ��f �I �. �'C_� 4th,.. • .. YOr l N�JT00_I i \ dY"��! R l� Ke ��i�'1P ��li. °.Ibi+n F' +rP.�' - Il��• � '• ^ r � �' y ?ems r�p18. ••�, ,p e" �� ,a •. • rt s / • ^ Ul - �• CITY OF RANCHO CU&,oi XJrA STAFF BLE, PORT DATE: February 25, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael D. Va'irin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 11608 - L & G LIMITED - A total development of 8.31 acres into 2 lots com- prising 120 condominium units in the southeast corner of Archibald and Victoria - APM 202 - 181 -07. BACKGROUND: The applicants are requesting review and approval for the development of a multiple family project consisting of 120 dwelling units on 8.31 acres of land, located on the southeast corner of Archi- bald and Victoria (Exhibit "A "). The site-is presently undeveloped occupied by unmaintained citrus q rove. The site is presently zoned R -3 (Multiple Family Residentialand is planned on both Interim and Proposed General Plans as Medium Density Residential at 5 -14 units per acre. Early in 1979, the Planning Commission had reviewed and approved an apartment project on this project site. The approval that was granted by the Commission has since expired. The Growth Management Review and Design Review Committees have re- ceived and rated the project and it has obtained the minimum points necessary to be considered for approval by the Planning Commission. ANALYSIS: The project and subdivision map has been prepared in ac- tor ante with the State Subdivision hap Act and the City's Subdiv- ision Ordinance. In addition, the site is proposed to be developed in accordance with Zoning Ordinance provisions and development stan- dards as adopted by the Planning Commission. The development plan, (Exhibit "B "), proposes two types of dwelling units; a townhouse style unit and a patio style unit. The dwelling units have been placed in groups of buildings at different lengths to provide var- iation of character and style of the development. The buildings are proposed to be set back from Archibald Avenue a minimum of 30 feet to up to 45 feet. The variation in the building setbacks along Archibald and Victoria will provide needed visual relief. Planning Commission Tentative Tract 11508 February 25, 1981 Page 2 Access to the project will be provided from one driveway off of Victoria Street. No primary access is proposed along Archibald Avenue, only a secondary emergency access which will be turf blocked. Additional turf blocked areas are provided throughout the development for needed fire lanes. Archibald Avenue will be fully improved to its master plan width and a minimum of 26 foot 1/2 street will be provided for Victoria Street. [Ultimately, it will be improved when the approved project to the north develops]. The development proposes to provide two attached, covered parking spaces for every unit. In addition, an additional 25 stalls are being proposed for visitor parking. The conceptual grading plan has been reviewed and approved by the Grading Committee. No exterior or perimeter slopes will be created and drainage will be appropriately designed. This project is required to participate in the development and installation of a master plan storm drain system in Archibald Avenue concurrent with the development of the site. The conceptual landscape plan, as shown in Exhibit: "C ", proposes an abun- dance of landscaping throughout the project area, including meandering sidewalks, mounding, and dense landscaping along Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street. There are some existing Eucalyptus trees along Victoria Street which would necessiWe removal as a result of the street improve- ments. There is another grove of Eucalyptus along the south boundary line which is proposed to be removed because of the proximity to each of the dwelling units. However, the applicant proposes to replace all trees re- moved with an equivalent speciman size tree. The development proposes a recreation area which will include a pool, some active open space areas and a tot lot. Individual patio private space units are proposed to be enclosed by low profile fences of various materials. The Design Review Committee reviewed the design of the project and unan- amously recommended approval of the design as it provides a variety of building materials and variation which will provide a positive character to Archibald Avenue and Victoria Street. The attached exhibits display the proposed design of the structures and the types of exterior materials which include shingle roofs, stucco, wood siding, brick, and shingle siding. Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant, is attached for your review. Staff has completed Fart II of the Initial Study and a field investigation. No significant adverse impacts on the environment were found as a result of this project. Issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order if the Planning Commission concurs with such findings. I] KI i Planning Commission Tentative Tract 11608 February 25, 1981 Page 3 I CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised in the newspaper as a public hearing it before the Planning Commissior. In addition, public hear- ing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the pro- ject site. To date, no written or oral communications have been received regarding this project. RECOMMENDA :riON: It is recommended that the Planning wmmission conduct a pu .c ea nr g to consider public input on this project. If, after such consideration, the Conursission concurs with such findings and con- ditions of approval as recommended by Staff, then the adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions would be appropriate. lly; submitted, anner BKH:MDV:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibits "D" and "H" - Exterior Building Design Part I of the Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions i W a Ililld . LJ J .as rnu�n �i� a r O ) 1 m � t u � 2 Z - i i' t ®.l J 09CO-095 0=1 'ONHCMU3 'SrM LIZOM 'UM 3INSM L"S I r 5 Elm gn uj I r 5 A' t C` L ar Im 1 � � �.�1tOi��M7.lq,.aer J. v -' �.. i• • � •.nkrlg uQ �i �� �.Si . ' 1 ° y j` • ".:C: d` .,' r,''' e < Rio,,, w� �o sMr7lbJ ar � t,:'q� ..P' • .dh.' eof i e ,• '�',i e�le ' e' ' n ,n •' wp. . R � 1 i '0 r it ri ir:r.•Ir rr r_' � e. >� 1 r > . �_' _c b � ;r.Cl, 1 1'! ul U ea_1 a .IC •.. ' I I 7ANNi°j,i %� ��q �iQym I 1 .� •rte ;w,a„�;� ie ✓'y" °�' '., ��rt'rt `'� -yam, �.Fr y z 4 't Ar., LV 1 h + r.:. , \., .. of r.l. "'.at• J 1 I ;, `��. •; .,� �;,. ., ., . :,�. ,; ,.,''_ .::'; ::. ;F i' ' � .� �. .. 1.� '1 1 .i .l � y ` �.. w bt • .:• •.0 t t I� �1 u` .. iF .In 111 }lf1 .4 4 \� J�/L '�ryj,� i� n� /�svy,�Yj � ■ L^ , 1 f r; '..I / 1I 1.1 1 11 1 11 1 .. 11 11 I 1 Iq ' 1 11 I .,. s I] CITY OF RANCHO COCAHONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - )JECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: ;n0,00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Pa of the Initial Study. The Development Review Con.:: _ee will meet and taxe action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which t:Une the Project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Huntington VillaQa APPLICANT'S IA1,4E, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: T, & G Limi-ted. TT 16371 Beach Blvd., Huntington Beach, CA 92647 Phone: c/o Friedman Toaawe MME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Friedman, Togawa, Smith, 9441 Wilshire Blvd., Beverly Hills, CA 213- 550 -8360 Southwest IM�g.A 2800 I rI S PrZaJECT 1 `STREET ADDRESSlAND, ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Assessor's Ma Book 202, Page 181, Parcel N0.07. Southwest corner o rc i a Ave. and Propose Victoria street LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL. STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERAST.iS: Tenta+iye and Final Tract Mapes Building Parmlts and Dept. of Real Estate Approval Y -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION GF' PROJECT: Construction of a 120 unit ential condominium, all units are to be 2 bedroom. protect is to be cymp P 1 in 2 Phasf� a, as 5h awn nn th attached development schedule. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSi;D BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Lot 1 is 4.69 acres and Lot 2 is 3.62, for a total Proiect acreage of 8.31. Excluding the garages, the s ware footage of the proposed u-2 ing is a sl a is vacan a presen . DESCRIBE THE ENVIROVM•=— M'AL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INrroRPfi%TION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTMEZAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): utilized as a citris orchard which has been abandoned in �� ��,�� • ���uG�acC inuicazes a past residence was years ago. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environ:neatal impact? tan i; 11 • WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO • X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ _Z_ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? x 3. Create a substantial change it demand for municipal services (police, fi:.e, water, sewage, etc.)'. X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? Remove any existing trees? aao many? X o. Create the need for use o:r disposal of potentially hazardous material! such as toxic substances, flamma.bles ox explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: All of the citrus trees will be removed.. The trees located on the north _ i+rOne-ty line will ho ramnup!d to imnrn.re pis + aria Cfrcot, trees located on east property line wil l be • r .moved for construction of 4' drainage ditch. iMPJn ^:'Tl: If the project involves the constriction of residential units, complete the fort on the next- page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the ciats and information required for this initial evaluatior to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statemer.tz, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand t-at additional information may be required to be sub :pitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development C RESOLUTION NO. lack A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAPiONGA, CALIFORNIA; CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11608 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11608, hereinafter "Map" submitted by L &G Limited, II, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of Caiifornia, described as a residential subdivision of 8.31 acres located on the southeast corner of Archibald and Victoria and being divided into 2 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on Barth 25, 1931; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the fallowing findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11608 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and ;.roposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the t,Vpe of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. �I Resolution No. Page 2 (9) $'hat this project will rLot create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11608, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: Planning Division 1. Removal of ekcalyptus trees will be replaced with equivalent specimen trees. Engineering Division 2. Installation of a portion of master planned storm drains in Archibald Avenue from its current terminus at 13th Street to Southern Pacific Railroad, shall be required. The Developer shall be responsible for 50% of the cost of this work. The cost of the storm drain will be credited to the storm drain fees and a reimbursement agreement will be executed to cover the remaining contributions. 3. Installation of drainage structure along existing dirt channel from Victoria to Ramons Avenue shall be required. All necessary on -site and off -site drainage easements for the improvement shall be dedicated to the City. 4. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. (A minimum of 26' wide pavement shall be constructed on Victoria Street. Necessary additional easements for the pavement shall be acquired by the applicant.) 5. All existing easements lying within the future right - of -way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 6. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility t'at would affect construction. 7. Letters of acceptance `rom downstream property owners shall be required where runoff from the tract flows onto private properties. Resolution No. Page 3 8. At the time of underground utility installation and prior to installation o` street improvements, the_ developer shall contact the appropriate cable television company for the area and make arrangements which would give the cr.,pany the opportunity to install cable at the time of trenching. If the cable television company does not install cable, then the developer shall install conduit and pull boxes throughout the tract. Such details shall be shown and verified on the improvement plans. Building Division 9. `surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilities necessary for dewatering all parcels, to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 10. Appropriate easements, for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted unto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division. 11. On -site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering or protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed prior to issuance of building permits for construction upon any parcel that may be subject to, or contributes to, drainage flows entering, leaving or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. 12. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permits. (This may be on an incremental,or composite basis.) APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1961. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY- Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST- Secretary of the Planning Commission Resolution No. Page 4 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the P1anhing Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E In DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS - Subject: _T i! . Applicant- LM-p - Location: sec. Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLUWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permi -ts. velo 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect -at time of Building Permit.issuance. —4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreas Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. _ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. _Z6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. -Z 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. Z8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for - review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. -JeL01019. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. -Z10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. �a ' 11 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planniro Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. �12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. — w / 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. �14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. V/ 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper ill;. : :. :nation. �17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project:. 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed an each unit. 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for "a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be .incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. _ 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a / solar water• heating t1Ait. f! 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout- the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum stapes, phys -ical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standard$�_shall be-submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. _ 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance . of equestrian - trails. — 25. This project shall provide . percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with e� neral Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project_ Proof of .this provision - shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. B. • Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. V"" 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. _3e!!""3. All two -way aisle widths shall'be a minimum of 24 feet wide. —Z 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. _ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. _jfL'018. The C.C. & P..'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation fer the owner. 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R. 's shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. u C. Landscaping - -Z1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. _ 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be- completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan,. 11 _ 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees ® shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the.Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing. On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. __J,!L'4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. _Z5. A minimum of 50 tre ,.�s per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20q -24" box, or larger, 70 % -15 gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon. V0'6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. _ 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such.slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. �8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance.zY.all be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be Subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted- within the project. _ /12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman si ges, and an abundance of landscaping is required along l�rl.Qi D. Si ns _ —Z1. Any signs proposed for this development sha'1 be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinancp, and _ 11 require review and approva by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the - Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. _ 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this M approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Required _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s)-at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conns or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. i S. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by .purchasers of homes r:hich have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot Tract , on ' I have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand that. Lot is subject to a mutual ;e- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occWancy. _Z6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of . building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Distrizts, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which Mates that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommoCating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification mu;t have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. �. 1c1 ,. 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development - �7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance _l. Of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or ® will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the r t! 2. Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval. in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Wacer Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all s,+pportive information, shall be - obtained and submitted to the City. - This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map —ZB. is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is r involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development - The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, _l. Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. r t! 2. Prior to issua ^ce of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply' for fire protection is available. Prior to the issuance of a buii-ing permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not - be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. 4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial r developmen4 or addition tq,.an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the es'fablished rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued —` for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. r ; 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. _ 2. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wpod trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures _ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building (s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. _ 3. Existing sewage disposal facil•itiez; shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Grading Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the — approved conceptual grading plan. _jeL00�2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. �4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering-and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdiv4 lion map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access _ — __ 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all incrior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shoo-in on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 25 additional feet on Aq2u&4w2 Aye. additional feet on �/IOQB W_ additional feet on J. Ell V'00'3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. _- 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as _Z5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over pri%v(ate roads, drives, or parking areas. ft { tI({y( t�e 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. Street Improvements 1. Construct full street improvements. including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. �2_ Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS I A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER . � ✓ L00001 - - -- Vol yen aa� "d 3. Prior to any work being perfcrmed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. V� 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. _ 5. Surely shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City= Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. 1%"0'6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of -the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. �7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed Per the requirements of the City Engineer. K. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. " 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: ____ 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions -of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. 1" 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. - ¢XHfL® ftft . L. Utilities _AZ 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. - 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. d 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. - 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. M. General Reauireme 1. Permits A. B. C. D. its and Approvals from other agencies will be required as follows: Caltrans for: County Dust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading perm San Bernardino County Flood Control District Other: �J ,4 r,. 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering cost: involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. Z.-- — E. CITY OF CANCHO CUCWUI ,A STP FP 1EP01 r' DATE: March 25, 1981 TO: Planding Commission: FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Plinner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant planner ' "A:yo �. o o E'- • � � z J77 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEPT P.ND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -04 - VINEYARD BANK - The development of a temporary bank facility on 5.69 acres in the C -2 zone located 180' south of Foothill Blvd. on the west side of Vine- yard Ave - APN 207- 21' -12 ABSTRACT: The applicant is -- quc,ting review and approval for the development of a temporary bank fa:ility located south of Foothill Blvd., on the west side of Vineyari Avenue. The bank will consist of modulyr units combined for a total of a 3,600 sq. ft. full service bank % facility.with drive -thru aid walk -up services. The project has been reviewed by the Design and Development Review Committees and has undergone many revisions per tieir comments. Staff has reviewed the project and recommended condit-ons of e.pp ^oval for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval for the development of a temporary bank facility on 5.69 acres of land located approximately 1801 south of Foothill Blvd. on the west side of Vineyard Avenue (Exhibit "A "). DISCUSSION: The applicant is proposing the construction of a 3,600 sq. ft. full service banking facility which will include a walk -up and drive -up facility along with an automatic teller machine. The bank building will consist of 5 modilar units pre - designed and con- structed to meet the applicants requirements (Exhibit "B "). The pro- ject site is bounded on all sides by vacant land, with the exception of a single family residence approxinately 160' south of the bank site. The property is presently zoned C -2 kGeneral Business Commercial and the Interim and Proposed General Plays designate this site for commerci 1 uses. The project site is presently vacant of any buildings or signifi cant vegetation, and the existinq grade slopes from the north to the south at approximately a 3% grade, a: indicated on Exhibit "G ". The applicant is requesting approval for a one -year period of time for the temporary facility. The applicant intends to construct a permanent facility to be located in the vic'nity of the temporary building site. The permanent facility will oecome part of the shop- ping center planned for this southwest corner of Foothill Blvd. and Vineyard Avenue (Exhibit '•C "). ITEM D CUP 81 -04 -2- 3 -25 -81 Staff Report ANALYSIS: The project site is adequate in size and shape to ac- commodate the proposed use as shown on the development plan, All ouilding setbacks, landscaped areas, and parking areas are being designed and provided in accor�ance with adopted City Standards and Ordinances. The illustrative site plan, as sho-M in Exhibit "B" indicates that the applicant intends to provide mounding and abundant landscaping along the street frontage and throughout the entire site. Access to the site is being provided by a single driveway located near the southern edge of the project site. Fourteen feet of dedi- cation will be required along Vineyard Avenue for street widening purposes. In accordance with the master plan of streets and high- ways, Vineyard Avenue will be widened on both sides and provided with paving overlay. AC berms, and striping for a left turn pocket. In addition, the entire frontage portion of the bank property shall be widened and provided with concrete curbs, and meandering side- walks. The development plans as proposed would require a total of 18 parking spaces and the development plans indicate a total of 29 parking spaces being provided and one loading space. The elevations, as shown on Exhibit "D" indicate the use of T1 -11 siding with a light stain,, a dark stained mansard wood roof, with varying overhangs, smoke glazed glass with dark anodized aluminum frames, and low profile stuccoed walls at entryways and ramps. The applicant has indicated that in addition to screening provided by the mansard roofline, that additional architecturally integrated screenwalls will be provided to adequately screen any roof mounted equipment. It is recommended that the design of any screens for roof mourtej equipment be reviewed and approved by the City Planper prior to issuance of building permits. The illustrative site plan indicates an abundance of landscaping will be provided for the pro- ject. Colored elevations and building materials samples will be available at the Planning Commission meeting. As the Commission will recall, in the past, temporary buildings were approved for one year with the possibility of a one year ex- tension. It is recommended that this te,nparary bank facility be approved for a one -year period, and that a condition be added re- quiring submission of plans for a permanent structure at least six months prior to the expiration date, unless an additional one- E CUP 81 -04 -3- 3 -25 -81 Staff Report year extension is granted by the Planning Commission prior to that time. The Design Review Committee worked with the applicant to formulate the design which is presently before the Commission. The Committee recommends approval of the design and that emphasis be given to landscaping throughout the site. Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant is pro- vided for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with such findings, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing notice was advertised in the Daily Report newspaper on March 13, 1981, and ten (10) public hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the , •oject site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all of the input and material relative to this project. If the Commission finds that this project is developed in accor- dance with the adopted Standards and Ordinances and does not adversly effect adjacent property, then a motion to approve the attached Resolution of Approval with the conditions wouid be in order. Re4ectf!:lly submitted, ty BKH :DC:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Master Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Exhibit "E" - Perspective Exhibit "F" - Perspective Exhibit "G" - Conceptual Grading Plan. Part I - Initial Study Resolution of Approval Conditions � i . • r . - e _ . w . r w .. .. Y : w • . r Y Y.. w •Y� Y h a. w .nwww +s/r want rw•w•ar. wrnrwrw��.•wwrar ���� � a s L a � r a s � • 1 s �natis -�mea�nne yn +s�riwona �va�eoaKav�aar�a�su . Ell 0 f o � o m l8 LSD U VI I 4 41 � p� po o a HIM 111111 LINpIII!LiU L9�lIllin � I 11 I WHIMMIlu 43 41 [A ILLM lui o 0o 0 0 4 o MI 0 0 Cb �68 x 88 —48• 2 n C 8 c f s a IY 2 r J g Si i 2 n C 8 c f s a IY 2 r J g Si , I K. 4 � :. r . a. �� .r •; � •';y iii. 1•• � `t �J4 1 2• ��I ',�11' , � Y 5 Y L` Ihl v 1 � r jC. —�.. -' _�.�1.1J�31j!`j' •jay 1. III, i�1�1, ` 1 1 1 ye its ` iY I1�`jralr 1 7 �I l it r� ,{,IJw r� ��1�•����1��� C� 1�x'1 Y t1 t[ l j .yf'h�• Rv k� 1+ (! n {' �?� ?�fpl��j�Y�' -7 � ��•1 l(�, '�� isE =�` l a+ +� a, f�41i1^',,: l <+ r r 1 E E e � � 1 - --------- 7 mom tit 1 j �C1Y.il•.6G� �R.S.C9'.fd g � 1— 1 V e " It 9 +Eip s a . �• 1Mf iV.rn +lYlY PWMV .. pQ W qj )M g R r. •a 0 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION ,r,HEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial S'_od'y. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard_ The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The E;.nject will have an dnvironmental impact and an Environmental Impact iteport will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROTECT TITLE: Vineyard National Ban ( in organization ) APPLICAN'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Steven Ricbard Sensenbach 8681 Wseline Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 714 987 =0177 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: as above if unable to cmj;L� contact the property owner: Mr. Gilbe-t Rodriguez 714 985 -0958 MCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSL•'SSOR PARCEL NO.) South of the S/W Corners of Foothill and. Vineyard Ave. facing Vi,nevagd. #207/21/12 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE ADD FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: • �Stsf�: ( T1?nt _ of lvniei n4admi.n l Permi t : T_D.—T D.—Tag-ass' to I i t° Federal: Comptroller of Currency: Authorization to organize was rte_ Aug. 1980. - PROJL'CT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Erect a new 3600 s"a ft modular bldg. to }r used as a full service ranlc?nn facility. Bldq. will i^pn�i Gt cif fi�.c (Sl i?S:fifl' ;mii•c nl a inr7nA � - 1 n i� drive -in znd walkup service area. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS: IF AVY- + fill be 30 rat. ft. {.,e �p��Q L,CW D1 60 DESCRIBE THE ENVIROMIENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLALITS (TREES) ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDT'NIG PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUC`i. %RES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): "-PreSellt: UllimtSrr sori ,recant- Iand Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series" of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? ;Z2. 11 11 u WILL THIS PROJECT: . YES D10 .. 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? XX 2. Create a substantial change in c<xisting noise or vibration? ?aC 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)'. 74c 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? XX 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? NOM _ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any 'YFS answers above: - N/A IMPORTANT: if the project involves the construction of 1 residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. DateFeb. 3, 1961 Signatureci�d',. Steven R. senbaCh Title Drncin� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -04 FOR A TEMPORARY BANK LOCATED 180 FEET SOUTH OF FOOTHILL ON THE WEST SIDE OF VINEYARD IN THE C -2 -T ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 6th day of February, 1981, a complete application was filed by Vineyard Bank for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of March, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project-. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and, 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on March 25th, 1981. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -04 is approved subject to the following conditions.and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. The temporary Bank facility is approved for a one -year period from the issuance of building permits and shall be removed from the site and the site appropriately restored, unless an extension of time in accordance with Commission policy, is approved. IL. I Resolution No. Page 2 2. If a permanent facility is desired, then appropirate plans must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission in time to allow for construction and completion of the permanent facility prior to the expiration of the approval for the temporary facility. 3. If screens are needed for roof mounted equipment, then they shall be constructed with like building materials to provide a solid screen. The final design must be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. ENGINEERING CONDITIONS: 4. Improvement of Vineyard Avenue with asphalt concrete pavement beyond the subject parcel shall be required as follows: a. Widen west side of the street with A.C. berm at the edge to 30 -foot half street width from north parcel line to Foothill Boulevard. b. Widen eastside of the street to provide for two through lanes and a 5 -foot wide half left turn pocket, from south parcel line to the proposed driveway with 150 -foot incoming and outgoing flare to meet existing pavement. C. Restripe affected lane's lines and left turn pocket to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility -that would affect construction. 6. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City standards. 7. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: 9 Secretary of the Planning Commission 2 �F'- i' ;L. Resolution No. Page 3 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of- R;;ncho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was dul :r and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commissi m of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: °YES COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: •;ti DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVEI.OPMENT STA14DARD CONDITIONS ��igsl Applicant -�_k' location:T�� !n(&e r(,j�,_ !� VJAbsymo Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development Z1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approveo site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. �ZZ. Revised site plans and bolding elevations incorporating al conditic•.� of approval shall be submittel to tine Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. __Z3. Approval of t;:'s request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning iir^inance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect —at time of Bu•116i-.9 Permit_ issuance. Ank 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. _ 5. Pail boxes, in areas where sidewalks a -e required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a u foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gales pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings are to be constnicted in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the rocf materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. _ 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for—review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. /9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent. properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. —/10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director •,f Community Development. A detailed liahting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, it %minatioo, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties: All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to ccnnect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public viEw from private and public streets. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, i•; ^iuding proper illumination. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on eaci_ unit. All --nits within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. Emergency secondary access shall be provided co this tract to the satisfac`,.ion of the Foothill Fire Protection District. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with -the Equestrian Trail Plan for ..lta Loma. A Jetailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum sl-opes,. phys-ical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards..-shall be- submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final rap. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. 25. This project shall provide . percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shat; AlIft he dctnr minnil by ".~nnly m�rL °t °.'.tcS, rciits at�u' ItCd iall IIII.Vism ievCf] qW at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision - shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. _ B. Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. /2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two-way aisle widths shall be a minimum of feet wide. �4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage jcor openers. 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The G.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the Owner. 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior ciruia *.ion aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed . by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building-per-nits. C. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be - -bmitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Existing trees shall be retained .wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be- completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into acrount the proposes: grading and shall be required to be submitted tc, and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the finr.l grading plan. 4t t f 1 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of :.he Planning Division during the review of the Mas per Plan of Existimo O)n -Site Tree Those trees which are approved foi- removal may be rega.`;red to be replaced on a tree -for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. —/4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. _ 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70 % -15 gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon. —/6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. _ 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such.slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied b_ the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all AML such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon compl tion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building ,ffir-;al. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germiratF. the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. SL:--h proof of maintenance -shall be submitted to the City prior to issaance of building permits. —9. The front yard landscaping, aad an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. _ 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be 3L•bject to approval by the ° 1 Division. �J V*"' 11. A minimum of s 0 : specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along 11 D. Lim!_ —/1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance spa ...: . ��- ^ - -- -- -_.._ . �.. he a.vwN� a Jefis s vc 'gii yr di nance and sha I 1 require review end approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall. be submitted to the - Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with th-.s approval and will require separate sign review and approval.. E. Additional Approvals Required _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. C .ector Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. _ 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance Conditional Use Permit -4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of months) at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. _ 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by .purchasers of Fomes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their prope.•ty. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , on , I have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Sioncd Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occupancy. 6. Prior to approvai and recordation of the final :nap. or prior to issuance of building permits, wh^n no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected Sct,.ol Districts, shall be submitted tL the Department of Community Development ohich s..ates that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approvai in the rase of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the d Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. - —8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planr:ing Commission. 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance nrior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development - _Z1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project_ _Z2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief thzt water supply' for fire protection is available. _ 's. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling units) or major, addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. _Z4. Pri4.r to the ::.suance of a building permit for a new comri,erciai or industrial development or addition t9, „an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the eSEablished rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issue for this project within one year from the date of project approval. /6. Street names and addresses shall be proviA d by the building official. 0 G. 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. S. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood or play -ons where appropriate. Existing Structures 1. _ 2. _ 3. H. Grading —Z 1. ® _Z2. _ 3. �4. siding Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with curren_ Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordant- with the Jniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the - appeoved conceptual grading plan. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer Licensed by the State of California to perform such work. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering_and Building Divisions and shall be completed prio!- to recordation of the fin-al subdivision mad or issuance of building permit whicf:ever comes first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown in the tentative map. 2. Deaication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way ot, the following streets: I 9 + additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on ` 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: _ 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access -j all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engvess and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Improvements I. Construct full street improvements including, but not limite' to, curb and gutter, A.C_ pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street A. lights on all interior streets. d 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER . 0000* .- 0001* goo __-e3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit �tnd fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. _Z4. Street improvement: plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. _ 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City'"-Attorney, guarante -ing completion of the pvblic`- improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of -the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. _wZ7 - Pavement btriping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. 0 ;A K. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage - facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at.the following locations: _,Z3 . The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the MaCional Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions 'of the program and City Ordinance Mo. 24. _.4r 4. A drainage channel .and /or• flood protection wall -Ali[ be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. 5. The fullowing north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and -rolled•driveways at property line. L. Utilities - 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. - 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving B utility companies and the City Engineer. d 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utiiities, as required. ® 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (MD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. 6_ approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. M. General Recutrements and Approvals - 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans for: B. County Oust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading permit) C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: _ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC,&R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to Lhe approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the Citv. pR�Of �9oA —Z3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form dLandscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. — 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. is +1 E CITY OF It A NCHO CUCArVJONGA Mr-r REPORT DATE: March 25, 1981 T0: Planning Commission FROM: Bar.•y K. Hogan, City Plann BY: Michael Vairin, Senior '444-cam SUBJECT: ENVIRON14ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SITE APPROVAL NO. 81-01 LORD -SHOBE rIMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH - The construction of a 5,000 sq. ft. church building on 2.07 acres of land in the R -1 zone lc ited on the south side of 19th Street, between Amethyst and Archibald - APN 202- 111 -19 ITEM E ABSTRACT: The Immanuel Baptist Churct: ha_ been working with the Design and Development Review Committees to formulate a site plan and a con- ceptual subdivision on the project site as described above. The Design Review Committee and Staff are not convinced that the present site plan and site configuration is the best alternative for the development of a church at this location. Therefore, Staff has prepared an analysis of the issues and provided the Commission with : -veral options so that direction can be gained frua� the full Commission for completion and processing of this application. BACKGROUND: The Immanuel Baptist Church is requesting approval for The development of a 5,000 sq. ft. church building on approximately 2 acres of land located on the south side of 15th Street between Amethyst and Archibald (Exhibit "A "). Recently, the church submitted a parcel map for the division of the church site from the remaining portion of the site. The Planning Commission tentatively approved the parcel rap with the condition that final recordation of the map cannot occur until a precise site plan for the church facility has been reviewed and approved by the Planning '.ommission. At the time of review of the parcel map, the Commission was concerned with i.,e site configuration of the church. The Commission felt there could be potential nuisances created because of the lot pattern thai, was proposed adjacent to the church. The site is pre- sently zoned R -1 (single family residential) and is planner. for low density residential uses. The site is presently vacant and is bordered on the easy by an existing single family residential development and on the south by a mobile home park. ANALYSIS: The Design Review Committee has met with the applicants on severs occasions to discuss two issues: 1. The configuration of the site and how it w411 relate to a subdivision around the church facility, and; 2. The architectural design of the church structure. ITEM E SA 81 -01 _2- 3 -25 -81 Staff Report The Design Review Committee felt that they could not provide a positive recommendation on the site configuration for the church facility as pro- posed (Exhibit "B "). The Committee felt that the configuration of the church site may cause potential nuisances to lots that would be created around the church site. The Committee feels that there are alternative configurations that could be utilized to reduce the amount of disturb- ances or nuisances that could occur with church at this location. The site plan as proposed is placing the church facility basically between an area which is planned and an area which is totally developed as single family residential. The Committee had concerns that several of the lots may _xperience disturbances relative to church activities_ Staff has prepared two alternative prcposals which show that additional church site configurations in this area can mitigate the land use compatibility problems. Alternatives "A" and "B" are provided for discussion purposes only. There are probably several other different variations of these two alternatives which could be used to help mitigate land use compatibility problems associated withlhis project. The appli- cant is responsible to provide the final design solution which will satisfy the Commissions concerns. The questions before the Commission are: Is this an appropriate location for a church facility of this nature? If the Commission feels this is rin appropriate location for a church facility, is the present proposal by the applicant ac- ceptable to the Commission? 3. if the present proposal by the applicant is not desirable, what direction can the Commission give �Vo the applicant that would satisfy the concerns expressed? Of the two alternatives prepared by Staff, alternative "B creates a better separation of the church facility from the existing residential and planned residential. Alternative "A ", or variations of alternative "A ", essentially creates a sandwich situation with the church facility squeezed between single family residential uses. 11 E 11 SA 81 -01 Staff Report -3- 3 -25 -81 The second issue which the Design Review Committee has been dealing with is the architectural design of the structure. The original design was proposed to be an all metal structure which the Committee felt was not compatible with the character of the area. The applicant has been revising the architectural design to limit the amount of metal used on the structure to provide a more compatible design with the residential character of the area. The applicant is willing to continue working with the Design Review Committee to resolve all their concerns on the architecture of the structure. The applicant is seeking direction from the Commission on the above - discussed issues. The options availat'e to the Commission are as follows: 1. Find that the project site is nc,` a suitable location for a church facility and deny the site approval (Resolution of denial is attached), or; 2. Find that the present proposal meets tt -i desires and concerns of the community and direct Staff to prepare final ccncitions of approval for your adoption, or; 3. Indicate that this area may be an appropriate site for a church facility but the present configuration is not acceptable in which the Commission would provide appropriate direction to the applicant for the preparation of alternative solutions and designs to the church facility. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in the Daisy Report newspaper as a public hearinq item. In addition, public hearing notices have been mailed to surrounding property owners wihtin 300 feel of the project site. To date, we have received no written or oral communication regarding this development. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all input and aspects of this project. After review and consideration of the issues presented, it is recommended that the Planning Commission provide the appropriate direction. BKH :MV.cd Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit F - Preliminary Grading Exhibit B - Site Plan and Drainage Plan Exhibit f. - Conceptual Landsacpe Plan Ex. G - Alternative "A" Exhibit D -E - Bldg. Elevations Ex. i - Alternative "B" Resolution of Denial 1 Y ^ 1. �. , ,� 1 } � i r., 1 ,J ', °ir' � y 1% 1, L � +: ���•, y...,. .�� 1 ' �"` ,, I D, � "i.: �. 1 I ' � .f � I �' '. 1 �' a� � '1 w1 R.. Y ^ 1. �. , ' 1 } � i r., 1 .,. ', °ir' � �;`, y 1% L � +: ���•, y...,. .�� , ,, ` � "i.: �. ' � C � �' '. 1 �' a� �� 1. �. . ' 1 } � i r., .,. ', °ir' � �;`, � 1 +: ���•, y...,. .�� , ,, ` � "i.: �. C 1 �' a� � '1 w1 R.. D. � 1. 1',.. ���; � l J`'. �'i 11 4 q �� �'• �✓ Ir' IP �� l (�i 1�.� '. ���, ^�,�� 5 I , 7 rf l' 11 ♦ ` :' A i7AV i ItK V�b 1TXL4 fit Cl VP- �($!1 w F" Chad ZF Z. �, wm �2 11 E I n LA i s -41+ ale# A c c �a P i'1f GAI A I s 0 � 1 7 14 Q� 47 Ifr 9 CIA ILTOAI !o /it 1 tit 1 * 114 1 Is i ALT E RNATIV ' A lb I RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING SITE APPROVAL NO. 81 -01 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CHURCH LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 19TH BETWEEN AMETHYST AND ARC.HIBALD IN THE R -1 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 9th day of January, 1981, a complete application was filed by Immanuel Baptist Church for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of March, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings cannot be met: 1. That the proposed use may be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: Therefore, this request is hereby denied by the Planning Commission. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 11 CITY Or RANCHO CUCANIONGA S7AFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1981 TO: Plannivg Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Otto Krouti"., Associate Planner SUBJECT: THE DEVELOPERS - A residential subdivision of Ib.t acres of land into 38 custom lots in the R -1 -12 zone; located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207 - 101 -37 and 207 - 092 -10 BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval of a 38 lot, 15.7 acre custom lot subdivision, generally located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon (Exhibit "A "). The project site is currently vacant, and slopes south and southeasterly with a maximum relief of about 100 feet. The site has a moderate growth of grass, weeds, shrubs, and some trees. Along the southeast boundary, the site abuts the Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way and tracks. The proposal has been reviewed as a custom lot subdivision by 'the Growth Management Review Committee in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance, and received a point rating in excess of the required threshold. However, the conceptual grading plan has not yet been cleared by the Grading Committee due to several concerns and issues described in this report. ANALYSIS: The proposed custom lot subdivision, shown on Exhibit A'r l is co�:sistent with both Interim and Proposed General Plan Land Use designations of Low Density Residential. The surrounding land uses and zoning are described as follows. LAND USE ZONING Site Vacant R -1 -12 North Single Family R -1 -12 East Railroad, Vacant F -P South Railroad, Vacant A -P and R -1 West Multi- Family, Condos R -3 -T The subdivision map has been prepared in accordance with the State Sub- division Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The basic street pattern has been predetermined, to a degree, by the existence of Camino Predera on the north. A secondary access is needed which most logically ITEM F TT 10035 Staff Report -2- March 25,'1981 should occur off Red Hill Country Club Drive in the northwest portion of the site. Further, due to the substantial grades the subdivision designs are rather limited. As requested by Staff, a topographic model has been prepared by the applicant for the Com- mission's review. Since this Tract Map was filed, the applicant has worked closely with Staff to resolve a number of concerns. However, in spite of a substantial effort to resolve potential problems, the following areas of concern remain to be resolved, and should be addressed by the Commission: 1. Grading - The applicant is proposing substantial 11 to 1 fill slopes on lots 2 through 9 on the down -side of the proposed street, as well as moderate 2 to 1 fill slopes on several lots on the up -side. Staff is concerned with the future develop- ment of lots 1 through 9; as can be easily seen on the topo- graphic model the nature of the grade would necessitate split - level construction with garages possibly located within the front yard setbacks (Exhibit "C "). Should this subdivision be approved, Staff would recommend that appropriate restrictions be recorded with the subdivision map which would enable the Commission and /or the Design Review Committee to retain strict control over the development of each of these parcels. In addition, the grading plan should also be revised to eliminate slopes in excess of 2 to 1. Geolo is�WV-ds - Due to the site's proximity to the inferred ocal tion of the Red Hill Fault the project site is located with- in the Special Study Zone. According to the proposed General Plan Public Health and Safety Super Element, restrictions which apply within State designated Fault Special Studies zones also apply to the City adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault. As required, a report prepared by a certified engineering geologist. has been prepared and submitted to the City (Exhibit "D "). The report concludes that no faults, active or potentially active, were observed in exploratory trenches or are known to exist within, the subject site. The Red ' Hill Fault is inferred to pass some 750 feet south- erly of the site. The report further concludes that the E TT 10035 Staff Report -3- March 25, 1981 probability of ground surface rupture is considered remote. However, it is recommended that a condition be placed on the map to require the Building Official to critically review each unit's structural integrity and if necessary, require increased structural standards. 3. Landscape Maintenance - Appropriate provisions should be made for the disposition and maintenance of areas adjacent to the two existing single family residenc-s on Red Hill Country Club Drive which are not needed for right -of -way purposes. Available options include: a. Extra wide parkways with low maintenance landscaping and inclusion of such areas in a 'landscape maintenance district. b. Traisfer cf ownership of the unneeded areas to the adjacent ® property owners, if they so desire. c. Inclusion of the two areas in lots 1 and 38. This option does not aPpcar practical due to potential maintenance problems. �LJ ni+ ' R+ The transfer of ownership optionappears to be preferable, however, should the adjacent property owners refuse the left -over areas, inclusion of the areasin a maintenance district is recommended. Also attached for your review is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the Environmental Checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Pending satisfactory resolution of the grading and seismic safety issues described in this report, the issuance of a Negative Declaration, with appropriate mitigation measures, would be appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: The 'tentative map has been advertised as a public hearing item in the Daily Report newspaper. In addition, approximately 70 public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the proposed subdivision. To date, no correspondence has been received. TT 10035 Staff Report -4- March 25, 1981 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive all public comments. If, after such hearing, it is felt that the areas of concern raised by Staff have been resolved to the Commission's satisfaction, the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval, with conditions, would be appropriate. or'"; vn:ca Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "8" - Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Cross Sections Exhibit "D" - Geologist's Report Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval Conditions of Approval A A i Stitt o11 di. ■dpMf �r .. • 4roQ z•- - =�Iri it . ■.C., , a�i: =:r fir/ u � ,G� `�0�.�►'�` I: _= me = gas i�a� =� r. .iii, ►g � �A. /. �■�G ♦ ��/ X -- .•. 111 �1- 1*�,.� ♦ _ .. ■ — ..rl� ' PENN V 1 IX �>-' 'e � \Y� .'.SRO' 1\ ,` \�` \ •" .� �. I1e.1�� V. N - r , u / T \ • h� ,\ " =� .LF• � � I I = Y/ —�r�/ , � I\\ is '\ " \ \./.`1 \ . 1 � , fe� � ••4\ \ - `. � x,11 1 � � I l j � � - v$ 0 1I— [r �>-' 'e � \Y� .'.SRO' 1\ ,` \�` \ •" .� �. I1e.1�� V. N - r , u / T \ • h� ,\ " =� .LF• � � I I = Y/ —�r�/ , � I\\ is '\ " \ \./.`1 \ . 1 � , fe� � ••4\ \ - `. � x,11 1 � � I l j � � - u 13 1 9� M111 Arai dal I W, 'I t Y3 i' • " tip:,, Yip 4 am C'] R tL•• O — +I Il — Ir 9� M111 Arai dal I W, 'I t Y3 i' • " tip:,, � •rye -b `\ �\ \ 1 y 'tea =1'•F9 _J Yip 4 am C'] R $pax c tgt Jill ld J ld %•,i > NIN Co � •rye -b `\ �\ \ 1 y 'tea =1'•F9 _J ■ ■ i ■ Y A -A Oub dR. , LR /fR /KIT• ,r e CIA Jul% 1 Dti LR /FR /BQ FIN 15H ��► CITY OF 1TE%t: PLANNING DIVISIQV Lxiiti3tT: G SGILt c a; F! 307 MINNESOTA AVE. �RAM0UNT, CALIF. 9072-- Prt-ject No. 611 -080 SOILS ENG/NEER/NG- ENG/NEERING GEOLOGY Action Engineering Consultants 5402 -A Commercial Drive Huntington Beach, California 92649 Subject Reference: Tentative Tract 10035 Rancho Cucamonga California Gentlemen: (213) 633 -6152 August 27, 1980 This is to repc:t the results of a geology and seismicity study of the above referenced property. According to the State of California Special Studies Zone Maps, the subject property is not within an area suspected to be underlain by traces of an ' active earthquake fault, however, known or inferred faults are reported to pass near the site. In order to determine whether a trace of a fault is present in the near surface soils, an explora- tory trench was excavated across the site, and the earth materials encountered were carefully examined and logged. Orientation of the trench was made in order to intercept any suspected trace at nearly right angles to the trench. Plate 1 depicts the location of the site relative to general topography, nearby streets and landmarks, while Plate 2 presents a graphic log of the earth materials encountered in the trench. GEOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SETTING The property is situate) on the south flank of bd Hill, at Ij I II i w Action Engineering -2- 611 -020 an average elevation of 1300 feet abov! sea level. As disclosed by the exploratory tench, numerous outcrops, and reference to published geologic literature, the site is immedi- ately underlain by deposits of older aLluvium and fanglomerates. These deposits are reported to overlie a thick Tertiary sedimentary section and granitic basement rocks at depth. FAULTS Major earthquake faults known to axist in southern California are shown on Plate 3. Table One lists faults considered "active ", that is, faults which break all format.ons, including alluvium, have an observable topographic expression, and have undergone movement accompanied by earthquakes duxing historic time, or have been so designated as active by the State of California, Division of Mines and Geology. No faults, active or potentially active were observed in the exploratory trenches or a.) known to exist within the subject property. No faults, offset strata, or indications of post ground movement were apparent in the natural ea.:th materials as exposed in the trenches. The Red Hill fault is reported to pzss some 750 feet southerly of the site. No traces of this fault or any other were encountered in the near surface deposits of the sub'e:t J property. � SEISMICITY ry Tables One and Plate 3, attached, have been developed from �11 various sources to show the distance to known active and potentially Action Engineering _3- 611 -•080 active faults in southern California considered pertinent to the site. The sources of information include prominent textbooks.!on geology and seismicity, state and county publications, as well as data disseminated by both public and private agencies involved with earthquake measuring and monitoring. While not all sources agree on all items due to the "state of the art" at the present time, the tables and plates included in this report are believed to present a fair and reasonable evaluation of the available data. Plotted or estimated epicenters of recorded larger magnitude earthquakes, which have taken place in southern California since 1769, are presented on Plate 3. The major and most recent reference concerning the geology of the area, "Geologic Hazards in South- western San Bernardino County, California ", 1976, C.D.M.G. Special Report 1130 indicate that the maximum credible rock accelerations to be anticipated at the site earthquakes in the vicinity of South- western San Bernardino County are generated by a 8.5 magnitude earthquake or the San Andreas fault, 0.40g, generated by a 7.5 magnitude earthquake on the San Jacinto fault, 0.41g, and generated by a 6.5 :magnitude earthquake on the Cucamonga fault, 0.558. Distance's from the site to known major faults are presented on Table 1. Groundwater Reference to published literature indicates that groundwater levels are in excess of 50 feet below the site surface. 0 Action Engineering 611 -080 SECONDARY SEISMIC HAZARDS Liquefaction: Ground failure due to liquefaction is considered highly unlikely since groundwater lies at a depth below which liquefaction can occur. The near surface soils do not appear to be subject to liquefaction even if saturated. Earthquake Induced Landslides: No existing landslides which could be reactivated by earthquake forces are present on the site. No imminent slides were observed on the subject property or on immediately adjacent properties. Tsunamis: The site is located approximately 50 miles from the ocean, at an elevation of 1300 .feet above sea level, which precludes it from the effects of a seismic sea wave. Seiches: No inland bodies of water, which would be subject to seiching, are located in the vicinity of the site. CONCLUSIONS Because no faults are presently known to exist beneath the site, the probability of ground surface rupture is considered remote. It is concluded that the proposed site development is feasible from the engineering geology point of view. RPC /jm (8) Action Engineering Respectfully submitted, BASELINE CONSULTANTS /� c and P. Cousxneau, CZG 32I 0 0 CITY Or RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING ElIVISION 1 U4-4r FfoL1. -FAkif %4,F�goam LozxTj�q �) NORTH ITEM: r- TITLE: Tu EXHIBIT E- SCALE: d/,n E E K] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $14e•60 Ao•oo For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of.this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Ctudy. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three - determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tract No. 10035 (Red Hill) APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: The Developers c/o Meurer Engineering, Inc. (2 3) 373 -0S01 24202 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite $201, 'Lbrrance, CA 90505 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Meurer Engineering: Att'n:Burt Mazelow 24202 Hawthorne Blvd., Ste 2010 Torrance, CA 90505 (213 ) 373-0401 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Camino Predera Extension s/o Red Hill Country Club Drive Assessors Book 207, Page 101, Parcel 37 and Book 207, Page 092, Parcel 1 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATF. AND FEDMAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCK PERMITS: All building permits, grading permit engineering Permits etc. I -1 PROJECT.' DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; residences. r This project consists of the necessary and utilities to create thirty nine (39) E ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: The existing aXe a of this parcel IS ±15.1 acres_ There are no existing structures on the site and the proposed building site will be determined when Plans are prepared DESCRIBE THE •ENVIROMMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, FLANTS (TREES), ANIMLS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (A. ^TACH NECESSARY SHEETS)s The environmental setting of this project is vacant hillside, there is no vegetation with the exception of weeds and brush. There is no cultural. *or historical aspects to this site. The surrotndina nrannrrinc ��„� ;a of single family residences to the north and east - cluster type- - _residential development to the west and railroad right o° way tc the Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series - of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? S o pia nrr�ia + no oar of a larger project 1 � . PROJECT.' DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT; residences. r This project consists of the necessary and utilities to create thirty nine (39) E ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: The existing aXe a of this parcel IS ±15.1 acres_ There are no existing structures on the site and the proposed building site will be determined when Plans are prepared DESCRIBE THE •ENVIROMMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, FLANTS (TREES), ANIMLS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (A. ^TACH NECESSARY SHEETS)s The environmental setting of this project is vacant hillside, there is no vegetation with the exception of weeds and brush. There is no cultural. *or historical aspects to this site. The surrotndina nrannrrinc ��„� ;a of single family residences to the north and east - cluster type- - _residential development to the west and railroad right o° way tc the Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series - of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? S o pia nrr�ia + no oar of a larger project C . J WILT. T1175 PROJrCT: YES NO x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! x. 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? x 6. Create the need for use. or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best- of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date_ 8f2r�cgG SignatureC p Title President 2 -3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTPUCTION The follOVYinq information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No,:,�, nPyAlonar� —� Tract No 30035 Specific Location of Project: Camino Predara� F�'ersion e/o Red M11 Country Club Cz, 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: PHASE I PHASE 2 0 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 6/81 or sooner 4- Earliest date of occupancy: 6/82 Model and I of Tentative 5, Bedrooms Price Ranae Not yet determined PHASE 3 PILZSE 4 TOTAL Wq Q a. RESIDENTIAL CONSTPUCTION The follOVYinq information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No,:,�, nPyAlonar� —� Tract No 30035 Specific Location of Project: Camino Predara� F�'ersion e/o Red M11 Country Club Cz, 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: PHASE I PHASE 2 0 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 6/81 or sooner 4- Earliest date of occupancy: 6/82 Model and I of Tentative 5, Bedrooms Price Ranae Not yet determined PHASE 3 PILZSE 4 TOTAL Wq Q RESOLUTION NO_ A RESOLUTIbN OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10035 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10035, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The Developers, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot subdivision of 15.7 acres of land in the. R-1-12 zone, located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207- 101 -37 and 207- 092 -10 into 30 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 25, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has re subject to all conditions set forth in the Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission Engineering and Planning Divisions reports evidence presented at the public hearing. :ommended approval of the Map Engineering and Planning has raad and considered the and has considered other NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: 0 SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10035 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans;, (c) The site is physically suitable for the -type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the t,--.a :ive tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. I Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. _ SECTION 'L: Tentative Tract Map No. 10035, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Prior to final map recordation, appropriate provisions shall be made for the disposition and /or maintenance of areas adjacent to the two existing single family residences on Red Hill Country Club Drive which are not needed for right -of -way purposes. Such provisions shall be approved by the City Engineer and the City Planner. 2. If this tract is to be developed as a custom lot subdivision, the precise design and placement of all structures on lots 1 through 9 and 14 through 16 shall be subject to approval by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Appropriate restrictions to this effect shall be recorded alon4_ with the final map. 3. The Building Official shall critically review the structural integrity of each unit in this tract as it relates to seismic safety. If, in the opinion of the Building Official, additional structural elements are needed, then they shall be so required. ENGINEERING DIVISION 4. Prior to final map recordation, the precise alignment of Camino Predera at Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be revised to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. Installation of a stormdrain system from existing inlet at Red Hill Country Club Drive to the existing inlet structure at Cucamonga Creek Channel including dedication of easements shall be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. All existing easements lying within the future right -of- way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 0 . Resolution No. Page 3 B. Adequate provisions shall -be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 9. Private drainage easements with improvements for cross lot drainage where required shall be delineated or noticed on the fianl map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the-Planning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: CnMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: KI DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject: Applicant: zl1^. Location: ate�:f1v CGS r r��c 1nG�- G�.rt>' <ae : �•� Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. ` 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permi -ts. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect -at time of Building Permif issuance. ® _r/44. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. _ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by th% developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 7. If - dwellings ::re to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for -- review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All roof appurtenances, including air cond °tioners, shall "a architecturally integrated, s' led from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets a:, uired by the Planning and Building Divisions. V"'�10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. _ 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adiacent properties. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. _ _ 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. _ 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticais kept out of public view from private and public streets. _ 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. _ 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each unit. _ 19. All units within this development shall be preFlumbed to be adapted for a solar water ;seating unit. _ 20. Energy conserving bolding materials and appliances are required to be .incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. ` 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. _ 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. _ 23. Local and Master Plannad Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum s`opes, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards, s hall be- submitted to and approved by the _ City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final maD. _ 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. _ A B. 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by. current market razes, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision - shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. _ . drking and Vehicular Access i. 2. _ 3. 5. 7 All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum or 24 feet wide. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. All parking spaces shall be double striped. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building per-nits. C. Landscaping _ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of " existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be- completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. KIII i rc 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced oi-a tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. tl"0 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. _ 5. A mini.num of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20% -24" box or larger, 7046 -15 gallon, and 10 % -5 gallon. _ 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. ?l 7. All slope banks in access o` five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shail be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each -individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Bu ?lding Official. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. d 8. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be'5ubject to approval by the Planning Division. 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees, and an abundance of landscaping is required along I D. $i ns _ 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conform =e with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance, and shall require -review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. _ 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall. be submitted to th; Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. _ 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with thi approval and will require separa.e sign review and approval. E. Additional Approval: Required _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Bui ding Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Variance Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(! ) dt which time the Planning Commissi -tn may add or delete coFF tions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. _ 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement b3 purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail cn or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home locat >d on Lot Tract on , ( have read the C-C. & R.'s and understand t� paid' Lot — is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the pu:,pose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Furchaser Said statement is to be filed by tie developer with the City prior tee occupancy. V6. Prior to approval and recordation cif the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivis on map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts. shall be submitted to the DepartrrMt. of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. )Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District rithin sixty (60) days prior to the final nap approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential proje!ts. /7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to 'thedh Cepartment of Community Development. Such letter must have been is;;ued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic talik facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. - f�8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is nut approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. ✓ 4. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordatior of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT 'IHE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development �1. The applicant shall comply with '.tie latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing C %de, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. V Z. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. V 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Foe, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. _ 4. PriAr to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition t9. an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 5. This approval shall become null and void if ouilding permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 1% 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. _ 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. _ 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures _ 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire- resistivenelr of existing buildings. _ 2. Existing buildings) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. _ 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and /or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the - approved conceptual grading plan. _Z2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensad by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. &%4- The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering_and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first.. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DTVTSION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access I. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights -ef -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the —' following streets: additional feet on additional feet on _ additional feet on k13. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal easements shall be pro, ided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Improvements 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 1/ 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited tc: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK. DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.C. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER . 1/ 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. t/ 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. _ _t,- S. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the Cit}- Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the pyblic- improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. V 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of -the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. K. Drainage and Flood Control 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: _ 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. _ 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wail will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. _ 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities - 1. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. — Y^ 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. p 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. - 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other tnterest .d agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. _ M. General Reouirements and Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be A. Caltrans for: B. County Dust Abatement (requ San Bernardino County Flood _kD. Other: required as follows: ired prior to issuance of a grading permit) Control District L -S7-4g q pp -de^l iScc�+9r ;lc� _ 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. , V 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. 1/ 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. ®_ — E i ®1 CITY OF RANG iO U_ C'.AMONGA STAFF REPOBX DATE: March 25, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 6761 - Carneli A residential Subd1V75ion of id./ acres int0 z parcels in the I zone located on the southwest corner of Highland and Carnelian The above- referenced parcel map was inadvertently placed on the Planning Commission agenda. It will be rescheduled and readvertised at a later date. Respectfully submitted, :BY.:jaa ITEM C QTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF SPORT i DATE: March 25, 1981 T0: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 6725 - Daon Corp* A ten 10 parcel comnerc a in ustrial.subd vision o 176.85 acres located on the northwest corner of Haven and Arrow E d:•j0 60 mom= The circulation plan as shown on above referenced Parcel Map does not conform with the previously discussed circulation plan. It is recommend- ed that the public hearing be continued to April 8, 1981. Respectfully submitted, C3.J : BK: j as ITEM H f.. LZ DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CL) AMaN)GA S AFF PORT March 25, 1981 Planning Commission Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer - Davis Devel An industrial subdivision of 4.39 acres of land into 8 parcels within the M -R zone located on the north side of 7th Street, east side of Hellman INTRODUCTION: The applicant is requesting the division of 4.39 acres of land into 8 parcels as shown on the tentative map. There is no proposal for immediate development of the parcels. A conceptual site plan showing possible development of the sites is attached for your review. The existing properties to the north and east in the M -R zone are presently vacant; to the west industrial buildings exist;and to the south is an exist- ing residential tract. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the envi- ronment as a result of the proposed subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the tentative map be approved, subject to the i�ty Engineer's Report, and that a negative declaration be issued. A resolution is attached to provide for approval should the Commission concur. ly sjpbmitted, LBH: BK: j as Attachments ITEM I RESOLUTION NO. A-RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6724 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 6724) LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HELLMAN AND 7TH STREET. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6724, submitted by Davis Development and consisting of 8 parcels, located on the east side of Hellman, north side of 7th Street, being a division of a portion of south 1/2 of lot 7, section 15, township 1 south, Range 7 west as recorded in Book 4, page 9; and, WHEREAS, on February 9, 1981, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on March 25, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above- described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: ® 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems..or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on March 25, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 6724 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Erjineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �. J I] 11 Resolution No. Page 2 BY: Richard D , Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I. JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Davis Development TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6724 LOCATION: NEC Hellman and 7th Street DATE FILED: 2/9/81 NUMBER OF LOTS: 8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of South 112 of lot 7, RECEIPT NUMBER: Section 15 T.I.S. Range 7, West FEE: $250.00 LONE: TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Williamson & Schmid GROSS ACREAGE: 5.44 ADDRESS:_ 17782 Skv Park Blvd. MINIMUM LOT AREA: Irvine CA 92714 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE # Joseph and Anna Comaroto 671 S. Aldenville Ave. Covina, CA 91723 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications _ 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on ihe following —` streets: 44 8400(4bX0 feet on 7th Street _ 11 additional feet on Hellman additional feet on 24 Corner P/L radius required on Hellman and 7th Street Other X 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be invited as fol ows: per Planning Commission Resolution 78 -29. 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6724 Page 3 ^_ 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans, fog: B. City: C. County Dust Abatement District: County of San ernar ino D. J.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5 deep: E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Map Control _ 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either 'frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: _ 24. all corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right-of-way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. ` 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located _ 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs clarification as follows: 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. Parcel Map Waiver is 28. Information submitted at the time of application is ! is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to E3 Recording for ) El Building permit for ) X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24 zone AO and Zone B. _ 30. A drainage channel anal /or flood protection wail along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. _ 31. 3f water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. _ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will a required to assess impact o increased runoff. X 34. Erosion protection measures shall be provided for the parkway area at the southeast corner of 7th Street and Hellman Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Ff; >; RCE 20 E E C CITY OF RANCHO CUCA14ONGA INITIAL STUDY C PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Envi-ron- mental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: = 6794 APPLICAN'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Williaumn and Sc rAd, 17782 Sky b PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CA 92714(714)549 -2222 llav1S JJE-V i.0E7IIMT-5, L4UV rul:a wi .tea.. La- I Vc" ..�..t ....... ...... ---- LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) No street address - Northeast corner of Seventh St. & Hellman Avernze. _ LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: =I %— I -1 80267 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Tentative Paroel Mako No. p=pgsing to creme eight (8) M zoned parcels from one (1) 6.02 acre Parcel El ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPCSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Parcel size gross -6.02 acres. DESCRIBE THE ENVIROMIENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORVATION ON TOPOG??,PHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): west crene a.l industrial - -- is the project, part of a larger prefect, one of a series - o£ cumulative actions, which al-though individually small, may as a whole have significan= environmental impact? No. _ g2 KI WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. C:eate a substantial change in ;round c intours? X 2. C.-eate a substantial change in existing n )i.se or vibraticn? _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for r unicipal services (police, fii-e, -water, menage, etc_)? X 4. e,reate changes in the existing zoning or reneral plan designations? X 5: temove any existing trees? Ho v many? X E. ^,reate the need for use or dir?osal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables o: explosives? Explanation of my yr'S answers above: N/A IMPORTANT: If the project involves the consi ruction of residential units, complete the :Drm on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the st tements furnishes above and in the attached exhibits present t' a data and information required for this initial evalua ion to the best of my ability, and that the facts, stat iments, and information presented are true and correct t IIthe best of my knowledge and belief. I iurther understaid that additional information may be re•?uired to be submitted before an adequate eva-ilation car. be made by the Development Review Committee. ' Date 2-5 -81 Signature Tour_ Bober Title )1 W l ' 70-13 d . @ers .• ig —T �— •... I gp. , k a � J 1t 1 I I .� r e• i •+ 1 I•F s d' J i N x m O � � �Q2 p my 3z 4 � WOLL Vm Z 35 ° W z� 9, F_. � <Y O t7 e �u< Z�Op o w F— s 6 9�1■ gr � c •^^ iZ M _J Um yap W a O m ®.? a m a r 1 i lil . JY q vY � C ir J y -4 nk d" - °i � s _ a t I Eat��a$ �I7q _ m %NNR•OeeFY notAT J OEAZF�p LS E v 203 zi 5. =� zee d r ..,,,i � ♦ o Nu � IU ,, 2 3v' d�Ioa4. y�sS Tr- Qr r_ L- u 0 u 1 11 �'�Y •�Y� • MY� \t Y LNI • '^J0195tl 9 8L731 j64=UV ML' ^ 'Q o: �•/O �'� 4 h L • f3 •!Nl1� • ♦.Q .a mn L. � 1 �• � LEJ DATE: TO: FROM: BY: I SUBJECT: L] 0 ABSTRACT: process fo Commission CITY OF R.P.MiD CUC'.AMONGA OFF REPORT March 25, 1981 Members of the Planning Commission Barry K. Hogan, City Planner Michael 'Vairin, Senior Planner - COCA CO�IROTTLNG COMPANY - The development of a Pb,Suu square foot bottled beverage distribution and warehouse facility on 9.2 of land in the M -2 zone, located on the north side of 6th Street, east of Haven Avenue. The applicants have completed the Development and 0� -sign Review r the above - described project and it is now before the Planning for their review and consideration. Recommended Conditions of Approval are attached for consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicants, Coca Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, are requesting approval for the development of a warehouse and office facility totaling 26,800 square feet In building area. The project site is located on the north side of 5th Street, east of Haven Avenue, and will be the first project in that immzdiate vicinity. presently, 6th Street is only a small dirt road which provides access to the existing on -site vineyards. The facility is proposed •_e be used as :warehousing facility only, with no manufacturing occurirg on the site. The operations include warehousing, loading and pickup for distribution of products. The site is presently zoned M -2 and the General Plan indicates the area as Industrial Park. ANALYSIS: The site development plan, Exhibit "B ", has been developed in accordance with Zoning Ordinance requirements and standards. Building set- backs, parking areas, and landscaped areas are all being provided in accor- dance with standards and policies set by the Planning Commission. 6th Street is a Special Boulevard as designated on the General Plan and it is being proposed to be landscaped as such. Since this is the first development in the area, this project will require the necessary imo:nuements to 6th Street from Haven east of the new north/ south streE* proposed by this development. The street pattern was previously established by a parcel map for this area which was approved by the Planning Commission several months ago. Access to the project will be provided by one driveway from 6th Street and onefrom the new inter4or north /south street. ITEM J z IT w CITY OP ® ]RANCHO CUCAM PLANNING DIVISION h. Planning Commission March 25, 1981 Page 2 The Design Review Committee has met with the applicant and architects to discuss the design of the facility. The proposed designs are indicated on the attached exhibits which show the elevations of the structures. Colored renderings will be available at the meeting for your review. The project is proposed to be con- structed of metal walls, panels, and a metal parapet roof. The Design Review Committee had concerns relative to the use of an all metal building in the Industrial Park area. The Committee's final recommendation was that the design of the structure would be mcre successful if the parapet roof and the side walls were different colors in order to provide more contrast and differentiation in the roof and walls. Staff also shared the same concerns, however, feels that more than a color change is needed to accomplish and appropriate design for a building in the Industrial Park category. The Industrial Park category is an- ticipated to contain high design quality projects which would include quality landscape, and architectural treatments. It is Staff's opinion that additional changes are necessary to create the desirable architectural feeling which has been discussed for the Industrial Park category. The building walls of the office building could incorporate other buiidiut: materials and yet retain the basic purpose of the metal building concept. Therefore, in addition to the Design Review Committee's recommendation that a color change be made between the roof and building walls, Staff further recomm--nds that additional materials be incorporated into the building wars which would further enhance the design and aesthetics of the building. Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and a field investigation and has found no significant adverse impacts upon the environment as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission review and con- sider the various aspects of this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings and analysis of Staff, then appropriate Conditions of Approval are attached for your review and consideration. !d, Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Part I h�. Resolut- "A" - Location Map "B" - Site Plan "C" - Illustrative Plan "D" - Building Elevations "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan Initial Study ion of Approval with Conditions I] 11 w1 a.Due unwa goucig 9ouownno opueb o.uu„�OU. I.,nl >ml. su. .mu.nuo° Il i 3 nga6uy sol 10 �cucou LV v 3 13wil)og elon -noon - uwva muou .•n uv.rualnu e,n.o Sul M W >��� I4V F 7.g i ak *3r r r opV sM L 11 0 IRK li AS 1 L 1 uu S ��. Yj I.� jI L 11 0 IRK li AS 1 L 1 uu S Yj I.� jI L 11 0 IRK li 0,2WOn ssl*Wv on to aL S� w 7 a r,,♦ m di Csr aL S� w 7 a r,,♦ m di ac.cve o:u pn : :e a.unr w: -" "' ^ • ,., •.•••` •• — :Pua0 z wowwm* oyoueu Oairl�i� Cu• I�rnlawll, pui��rnp >xWiuii� �AIO�.IM> /.Nw1Yw M I�MY/%M 4 ......p p.n�vu V.. .a.rva.nv o...e CJ W!I�ILI•YG� 7 QUO'' tMOBut• fo'1 /G l4t•eLLID3 BWAGS Blp'.i- �•'��J I 1 [N Y 1 I f 9 .I �eS �O I Sob d), Z • �x 1 4 a -- ` Yw9- u W ey 8 iCUOon� ogu Y �^ \ 0.11 ... ICY\ hl{\ �pp \�1 ptl M.n j. ;� Iw.u:U I r•e.d � W aolpN7iu O7 pi � LilOuy d7 ,O JWLCWO) OuapDe LlOo-QO7 LJ 41� Jqa i $ 1 i , Jilt . 1 ' a Ell CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY r PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $ 90.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis ataff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, Z) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: f Ac6tCtics CucAi -�A i5�ructa CocA-Co,^ e= u L& Co • o F I os ems A7PLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, S- NAME, ADDRESS, Y'ELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: — IAcUt- IrOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AW FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: _ . 1 f• PROJECT 1ESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Samoa El.--7 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: p��s L]^ �..�� DESCRIBE THE ENVIROUMENT-AL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SI'D'E INCLUDING INFORMATION vN TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROU -MING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): �=4]F= 'Jt4P� / �%� o g �OCT�}}• Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, gray as a whole have significant environmental impact? Flo 1-2. kI El WILL THIS PROSECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2, Create a substantial change i:i existing noise or vibration! _ X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! _ X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? Ac 5: Remove any existing trees! How many? _ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statenuonts furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Deveinpment Review commi tee. Date �/7 /. Signat Title 2 -3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81 -01 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SIXTH STREET, EAST OF HAVEN AVENUE, IN THE M -2 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 9th day of January, 1981, a complete application was filed by Coca Cola 3ottling Company for review of the above - described project; and WHEr?FAS, on the 25th day of March, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the Gbjectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and, 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and, 3. That the proposed use is in compliance wit', each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on March 25th, 1981. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 81 -01 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached standard conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The final exterior materials and colors of the office and warehouse structure shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of Building Permits. F9 L.-A Resolution No. Page 2 ENGINEERING DIVISION: 2. Recordaticn "of tentative parcel map no. 6544 shall be A required prior to issuance of building permit. 3. Applicable portions of the conditions of approval for Parcel Map 6544 shall also apply to this project as determined the the City Engineer. 4. Letter of acceptance from downstream property owners shall be required where runoff from 6th Streetfiows onto private propE•rties to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City standards. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT- COMMISSIONERS: 0 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEnT STANDARD CONDITIONS Subject :_V�� Applicant:_CCCA CO 1A Location Those items checked are conditions of approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT. THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on fide in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations in --orporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Eivision prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Approval of this request shall. not waive comeliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adecuate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. _ 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be instalied and located by the developer subject to approval LV the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptac%. areas shall be enclosed by a i foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standa•ds. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. _ 7. If dwellings are to be constructed in an area (esignated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous ", the roof materiels must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8:- A sample of the roof material shall be submittei to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of bullding pensits. 9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditionors, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound bu Tered from adjacent properties. and streets as required by the Planning and Buiidin; Divisions. �10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approvai contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 1110 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuanc, cf building permits. Such-plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method oT shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. — - 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational u:as. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Offi =ial prior to occt,pancy of the first unit. _ 16. Ali buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 17. Sulid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security dev'„es such as W'in,'ow locks shall be installed on each unit. _ 19. All units within this dev=iopment shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conservinq uiai.li nn r�teeiais and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. 21. This development shall provide ar. option to home buyers to F:;:shase a solar rater heating unit. 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 2s. Lccai and Master Planned Erues:.ria.i Trails shall be provided throughout: the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating- widths, maximum slop =s, physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with city equestrian trail standards shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. 24. This tract shall form or-annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. 25. This project.shall provide percent of a.-fordable housing- and /or rents, in-confcrmance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income,levels at tfie time of construction of.the project. Proof of this provision shall be submitted to the Planning -Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. — - B. - Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall. _of 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 26 feet wide. 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintt: nce free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. _ 6. All units shall be Drovided with automatic garage door openers. _ 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. _ g. No parking shall be permitced within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R.'s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Existing shall be retained wherever possible- A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be completed by the developer. Saia plan shall take into account the proposed 5radiny and shall be required to-be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of i'•e final grading plan. .•. _ 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall he trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Diviaion during the review of the Master P14a of Existing On -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. _ 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, _hail be provided within the development; 20 % -24" box or larger, 70 % -15 gallon, and 10 % -S gallon. —0/-6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 7. All slope barks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irri�".lticn shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer un:.l each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection of the slopes shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official. Irrigatiun on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. _-8- All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted mans. _ 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways,.walls, landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. V. A minimum of aZ * s specimen size trees shall be pial.ted within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size5.re and an abundance of landscaping is required along 11 D. Signs _z1 - Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conforrsnce with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance anw shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. _ 2. A uniform sign program for this development- shall be submitted to the Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. ` 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. E. Additional Approvals Reouired 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. _ 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and /or Varia a %Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month' ;) at - which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or- revoke the Conditional Esc Permit. The developer is ;•equired to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot Tract , on I have read the C.C. & R-'s and understand t at said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to-gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with tFc City prior to occupancy. _ 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School - Districts, shall -be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. petl }�i�a•, F. 7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or F.ior td the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, ,hat adequate sewer and water facilities -are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the go Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60•) days prior to final 'map approval 'in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. 8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growtl Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map iF the subdivision is -going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordi,.ances in effect at the time of approval of this project- vole 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible constrI.Iction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. 3. J4 4. 5. .1 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling uni''s) or major additign to an existing urlt(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the estz�,lished rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit ant' Plan Checking Fees. - This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not Issued for th.a project within one year from the date of project approval. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official. 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan -ons where appropriate. - G. Existing-Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire - resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, f%lled and/or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Gradin 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shalt be is substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. �. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California. i:o perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or, geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. 4_ The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes. first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: '- I. Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street riqhts -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights -of -way on the following street:: I-VIA 30) additional feet on (0 <;ireet ® _ aaditional feet on additional feet on 3. ✓3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall -be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. ✓6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods Lo the property or in the operation of the proposed business. Street Improvements 1. Construct full street improveu;F!nts including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway tries and street lights on all interior streets. 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to: STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. ! SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR. STREET LIGHTS A.!;. OVERLAY WHEEL CHAIR RAMPS OTHER ✓ ✓ ✓ r/ �/ W4 u V- ✓ ✓ ^ _ I� w- #4 3wpp "cA "m P v.u.w,q ww v iv a1. rvmwM iaswlcapW5 ano lvrt jow 4 . 1 3. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. 4. Street improvement plans apprived by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an 2ncroachmr-t permit. ✓ 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed tn the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney, guarantee - *iig cowpletion of the public improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. _ ✓ 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic aftd street name signing shall Per the requirements of the City Engineer. be installed 9 K. Drainage and Flood Control ✓1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. - _ 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: __I,/3. - The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insure.nc= Program and is subject to the provisions 'of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. _ 4. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. _ 5. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, and /or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. - Utilities ✓/ 1. 2. 3. ✓ 4. All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed undergroind including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. ✓ 5. Water and sewer systcr. plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Foothill Fire District and the Enviro:imental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCWD will be required prior to recordation. _✓6:- Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and o. er interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be F,lbject to any requirements that may be received from them. M. General Requirements and Approvals Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: _-.1o'B. County Dust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading permit:) C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the pity. ✓ 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Ihtention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. ` The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. _ 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. e- L11 CITY OF RAI\U10 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 25, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hcgan, City Planner SUBJECT: FOOTJILL 80111_FVARn cnRRTnnR ABSTRACT: As the Planning Commission will recall during the con- sideration of the General Plan along Foothill Boulevard, there was much concern expressed over the variety of land uses, existing and proposed. Therefore, the Planning Commission found it necessary to establish a Foothill Corridor Study zone. Staff in('icated that the study would not hamper any development progress along the Boulevard and that we would bring forward to the Planning Commission, prior to development consider- ation, any issues that might arise or could arise from a proposed develop- ment. This is one issue. DISCUSSION: The property in question is the Perry's Market site and the vacant land surrounding it. There is an application that will be coming before the Planning Commission for a Parcel Map and development of two of the parcels within the lot s -lit. In close examination of the area, we found that there are many problems that the Commission should be aware of before approval is given for a lot split of develop- ment on the property. Three exhibits have been prepared for your infor- mation. Exhibit 1 shows the existing zoning and land use cross - hatched on the mar as the Perry's Market: the Dry Cleaners, the Drug Store and Pet Store, and the Standard Gas Station. Also listed on the map are the -carious uses of the property. As you can see from Exhibit 1, there is a real hodgepodge of uses. Exhibit 2 indicates the four parcels which the Parcel Map ,jroposes in its division. 'he remaining property appears to be already subdivided. However, in checking the records there is no Title Report that has been filed with the Parcel ;�ao. it has sinco been requested. Our initial feeling is that the 1,)t split which has occurred on the Perry's Market site may not be a legal lot split, and in fact, there may be only one piece of property encompassing the Perry's Market site and the remaining vacant property. The question that arises is that with the property zoned C -2 (Generaly Business Commercial) is it appropriate to develop all Commercial or is there some alternative that would be better planning? We think there is. ITEM K NEC Foothill & Helms -2- February 25, 1981 He believe that consideration should be given to a residential use on Lot 4 and everything north of Lot 4 would be commercial. Exhibit 3 shows how a suggested residential tract of 4 units per acre might develop un Parcel 4. Higher density could be utilized also on this property. The Commission should be very careful in discussing what land uses are or are not appropriate for this particular property since any discussion that :night appear to have the effect of a decision on land use outside of a specific Ganeral Plan request would be pre- judging a public hearing item. However, we believe that the Commission can give a strong indication as to their desires for development of the property in question. Specific- ally, does it appear that Lot 4 is good commercial property, or would it be better residential property. If the Commission concurs that Lot 4 would be better residential and poor commercial property, then that indication can be given through discussion a•! a min_ *_c — action by the Planning Commission relative to this Staff Report. If the Commission feels ot:oerwise for the development of Lot 4, then indication should be given as to what would be an appropriate development of that property. Respectfully submitted, ty i H: co Attachments: Exhibit "1" Exhibit "2" Exhibit "3" - Existing Zoning and Land Use - Proposed Lot Split - Suggested Land Use El 11 E E, f ' r�., y.. l•-. ar:...... r. wl... : r...-... .�:w::::;!.a.,a�.y�.�..._5.1.�_ .- -._ -- ,_ ..'J' ,. '^ STAN co a /o.Qto 1 .•s� . . V'rtt.,o; � a ,. f/AG"r`f.'' ... ` i/hAexr • i4Rk,yEj � f , W � MQ.�tT �•e e .B�jAC S7AT.av S two .•� �. ua o0 It /ro icy 44 • 1 � 2 R I � hnl .� � � i g ' 4;4!..71!: M11. ros ss �'es �. .R.l OC ilk t j : UA17 q .v6useE . W / . All. jf•v R• -/ R -/ J ZA"o d/ •L �. ` '` •`. e ?s HsLnIoS.S>iR� W; .Al 2.�►M. h ) 1f34'i 2 E GO m na A 4 •L �. ` '` •`. e ?s HsLnIoS.S>iR� W; .Al 2.�►M. h ) 1f34'i 2 E ,y. �'�, ^�'1. 1] .;u . ��'' ., .�r. �� ,: r' .,. 1• . er.:. ,f 1., ri �. -��., ",,',, :�� ��. �, ,: �;f, f I it. I .ri 1, ',�. ',,} .;; s ''':�� i� O Ij 11..11 .� �� � �` a. .t. � V i 1 "�1 �.: a.. j. Planning Commission ftsting of r/5 RANCHO CILAMONGA PLANNING �--IIMMISSION S--GN-LIP SHEET Please print your nave, critg, and indIcate thc, item yon Wish to SpeaA on. Yru. 214ME f .DDRESS Tv TCM 4-1) 2. L 5. 6. zef� ,,�7.kcebip 7o 7. 8 0 dF 9. -7 12. 16, 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. .25. 2 6. 27, 28. 29. 30.