No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/07/08 - Agenda Packet11 E 11 CITY TA.�`' '' pI&PORT GA DATE: July 8, 1981 T0. Members of the Planning-Commission FROM, Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: The development of a light industrial REIUEST FOR TISAE EXTENSION FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW No 79-4 UESTUAY INVESTMENTS - �mplex to a Located on the sout� side of 8th Street, east f Hellman Avenue. BACKOUND The attached letter from Charles N. McKinnon of Rancho of the above - described project. Cucamonga Industrial Far•tners, Ltd. requests a six month extension on the approval ranted on was The original approval for Director ReTwowsix` month extensions were June 27, 1979 (Exhibits "A" Commission. The current�etherd pre\1ious1y approved by the Planning applicant is requesting 1981. He cites high interest sion expired on June 27, 1981. The aPP six month extension to December 27, rates and general economic conditions as justification for this ex- tension. Director Review approvals are valid up to a maximum of a lati months: with apps �"iate extensions, p er the Zoning Ordinance regulations. if granted, ss the last possible extension that can e g for this project. RECOMMENDATTON: Based on past Commi1be ranted 5 „r�Directorecommended iew that a final six (6) month extension o date of June 27, 1981 No. 79 -41 to run from the present expiration to December 27, 1981- lly submitted, P1 BKFi:CJ:jr Attachments. Exhibit "A” - Master Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Site Plan ., Inc. Letter from McKinnon B1DD-rrupc'� "" ITEM A ICI h c 1I lAarp, it 0 0 NORTH CITY l` CA. 1TEA1:121f� -Tc9 a-✓ o,,J 140. -M -yl RANCI -10 CUC1MONGA TITLE: M#4GMs2 s"5. rL#-t4 �. PLrtNl\[ \G DIVLs:GN EtH[f31T — �SG1LE M•'r5. 0 . Ell kA CITY OF RAI'CHO CUGUNION,rGA PLANNING DIVISIGN NURTH ITEM: 2012 CE 22K -RfRJ1P;�t/ No• 79 -141 TITLE: 21Tr-- ll:& 4 E. \[i11;IT: -33-_ SCALE: N' S. A McKinnon Bibb- Properties, Inc. Jun,; 8, 1981 Mr. Mice Varian Sr. Planner City of R.ancno Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. 91730 c,erT. LE: Request fcr time extension on Direct Review No. 79 -41 Rancho Cucamong::. Industrial Partners. Dear Mr. Varian, We are still unable ;to proceed with the proposed development at 8th and Hellman Streets due to the current high interest rates and unstable economic conditions. Therefore, we would like to request another six months extension be granted from June 27th. We are enclosing a check in the amount of $50.00 for the f; 7 •inn F4an.- Ve y truly yours, L° 0. / &-e't harles N. Mc4innon R.C. Industrial Partners CM /J 2737 East Coast Highway w Corona del Mar, California 92625 ■ (714) 675-2311 CJTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 8, '1981 T0: Members of the Planning Commissie ^. FROM: Earry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR SITE APPROVAL LUTHERAN CHURCH • The developm~-nt of a churc' on 2.11 acres in the A -P zone located on the corner of Haven and Banyan Avenue. BACY.GROUND: The applicant is requesting a twelve month extension on the Site Approval for a 175 seat sanctuary with a proposed multi- purpose facility totaling 4,388 square feet (Exhibits "A" & "B "`, Difficulty in obtaining financing is the reason cited for the extension request. (See attached letter.) In early 1979 the City Council approved a Zone Change for the project site from R -1 to A -P. The Site Plan was approved on July 9, 1980. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a 12 month extension be granted for Site Approval No. 80 -09 to run from the present expiration date of July 9, 1981 to July 9, 1982. fully submitted, Pi BO.:CJ:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Illustrative Site Map Letter from Irwin 8, Associates ITEM B rL000 GorsT[�. I �I't'I' .s.TSa ee-r r� `4 I LL Ix vp. x.1.1 s��>;�11blr�a pWY CITY Oz' RANCHO CUCAiMO\'GA PLAN \[NG DIVISION a�ia.v��Y GOLL�o(1� ' I i I • ti V � NORTH go TIII.E- I!!L'� / llys-7l3 ir `r ���. �� 'd... ., ,,; r i.. ., L ),i'.�.'.' � �� . °: '•, 1. ('� 1'..: y,`;. . _ _� .. � , i.• �. �1..�.•il� I , �. 1' �� � r � / r i � ' ��' t r r h,� � �i.� i � t < I, � c. �� j,� h, '., � > , '�; ��'' y�., �, . ;.'. ,: i;�,i.i ���:�r.�,, 1l.' :�, �j: �'., '. `r ���. �� 'd... ., ,,; r i.. ., L ),i'.�.'.' � �� . °: '•, 1. ('� 1'..: y,`;. . _ _� .. � , i.• �. �1..�.•il� I , �. 1' MAWIriVliw v ASSOCWJES AJA Archlrecnxe /Plamkg/Irterlon HunthaTon beach / Ookland r Jane 9. 1981 Att: Michael. Vairin Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Shepherd of the Hill Lutheran Church SA 80 -09 Dear Mr. Vairin: We are requesting a time extension on the site approval .tor the above referenced project. The reason for the extension is that with the state of the economy, financing has taken longer than anticipated. Thus, we are requesting a twelve month extension. Enclosed is a. check for fifty dollars ($50.00) to cover the extension fee. If you need further Information or additional fees, please contact me. L Thomson, A.I.A. Encl: JT /mf ❑ 16400 Pacific Coast Highway, Sore 205 Huntington Beach. CA 92649 Q 8477:Enterprisewcy,.Suire110 : Oaldond.CA94621 Cb u • 213 / 592.3309 714 ! 846.3319 415 / 635.8669 _ E. DATE: T0: FROM: EY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF DEPORT July 8, 1981 Members of the Planning Commission Barry K. Hogan, City Planner Dav Coleman, Assistant Flanner VARIANCE N0. 81 -02 - �HRISTiAN - Request to construct residence that will encroach -into front and rear yards on a 3,281 square foot lot in the R -3 zone located at 6969 Amethyst - APR 202 - 131 -04 ABSTRACT: This tn continued June 2gr a the applicant toresolvep oblemswiththisequest. Re- vised plans have been submitted •nd reviewed by Staff in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance Stant ds. Staff has provided a detailed analysis contained within this report and is recommending approval of the variance based upvr� ndings listed in the attached Reso- lution. BACKGkOUNn_ The applicant is requesting approval for a variance on the front and rear yard satbacks fn. r a 1paa1 substandard size lot ;rner of located at 6969 Amethyslicantupreviouslycdemolishedoand removedtaeet (Exhibit "A"). The app structure from this property with the intention o con- delapidated structing a structure residence. the applicant has submitted construction y Divisiodrawings to the Building and Safetn which indicate a proposed two story residence as shown on Exhibit "C ". The Zoning Ordinance requires a 25' front yard setbac;,�antais0, rear yard setback for property in this zone. The app,' requesting a 9' variance in the front yard setback and a 12 vari- ance n approverthervariance, should bee16' from them mission app public right -of -way on Monte Vista Street and 8'lic°mttsebasis for back, line, as indicated on Exhibit "B ". The app requesting the variance is based upo35tnlesubstandard lot size n nd configuration that is approximately required in the R -3 zone. ITEM C Variance No. 81 -02 July 8, 1981 Page Two ANALYSIS: Although the proposed variance, if approved as requested, would result in the construction of a residence 8' from the rear prop- erty line, which is the side lot line for the property to the north, the existing residence to the north is approximately 15 to 20 feet from the subject property line. Therefore the result would be a separation between Lhe two residences of 25 to 30 feet. Consideration should be given to the fact that the subject property is a 3,281 square foot lot, whereas the R -3 zone has a minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet. Additionally, although the Zoning Ordinance now require- a 20' rear yard setback, the County Code required only a 10' rear yard set- back in the 0-3 zone which is consistent with most of the dwelling units constructed in the immediate vicinity along Monte Vista Street. The front yard setback reduction to 16' would not be inconsistent with the setbacks found on other lots within the area under similar circumstances. Variances may be granted by the Planning Commission for certain devel- opm�nt standards only when, because of special circumstances applicably to the property such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict interpretation and application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in t "e vicinity and under identical zoning classification. Therefore, variances may be granted when the strict enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would result in practica. difficulty or unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance. After review of this request, Staff finds that the proposed variance is consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community or the surrounding area. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing and notices ave been mailed to property owners within 300' of the subject property. To date, no correspondence has been received for or against this project. Ll G Variance No. 81 -02 July 8, 1981 Page Three RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a pub is hearing to consider all public input. If "he Commission concurs with the findings of Staff, then the adoption of the attached Resolution would be in order. .ed, Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "8" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevation Resolution of Approval CITY OI.' R.N.NCIAO C,'CA.TMONGA TITLE: - LOCA°ria MAp PLANNI, DI�'LSIa�1 EXHIBIT: A SCALE: '0°"' i� 9 f/ 'mil FORTH r. _i- iVJr1U?'L`t Vi5TA 7-,i,. i 10 12 14 CITY OI.' R.N.NCIAO C,'CA.TMONGA TITLE: - LOCA°ria MAp PLANNI, DI�'LSIa�1 EXHIBIT: A SCALE: '0°"' i� 9 f/ 'mil FORTH i L-- -' - " r i lr M04TG VISTA S-I C'IT'Y O RANCHO CT-.TCAArIoN( ;A PLANNING DIVISION 6 r z'u.s �, i i -`--r 4 G NORTH ITEM: i "ITLE: __ EXHIBIT: $ _ SCALE: 411 ti 1 117 Elll CITY 011 RANCHO CUCAiNIOJNGA RAINNING DIVISION C5V NDRTH A ITEM: I . ITLE: r O . f dF me& Mc A&B"domommPA. LXlill3lT.- - SCALE -.--Nmmw 11 RESOLUTION NO. AMIN qP A RESOLUTION OF THE 'RANCHO CuCAMnNr,A P1 QNNTNr COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 81 -02 TO Y DEVIATE FROM FRONT AND REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS LOCATED AT 6969 AMETHYST AVENUE IN THE R -3 ZONE. W4EREAS, on the 21st day of May, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of July, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Covernment Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following Findings: A. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Zoning Code. B. That there are exceptional Gr extraordinary circumstances ® or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the nwners of other properties in the same zone. D. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other Dronerties classified in the same zone. E. That the granting of the Variance will not he detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y Jeffrey King, Chairman Tow ATTEST: Secretary of the panning ConmlIssion Resolution No, Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of thn •••, w ^ ^ ^• + +wn v, 611t: C /{,y OT Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of July, 1981 by the followi.ig vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONER: 140ES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 8, 1931 T%1: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Arlene J. Troup, Assistant Plannc- SUBJECT: STREET NAME CHANG!' FOR 151t;i STREET - Proposad to be Olive Strect, an east/west r6nning street from the Rancho Cucamonga City Limits Just west of Sapphire Street to its terminus at Palm Drive, a distance of approximately three (3) miles ABSTRACT: After adoption of the Street Naming Ordinance, the City Council requested that a name change be initiated for 19th Street. Staff has reviawed the pr000sal and has compiled a detailed analysis within the attached report. The street name change is now before the Planning Commission for their review and consideration. A Resolution has been prepared and is attache!, should the Commission wish to approve this item. BACKGROUND: Per the City Council's direction, a name change has been initiated in accordance with the Street Naming Ordinance for 19th Street. It is proposed that the name be changed to Olive Street. 19th Street is an east /west street located 3/4 mile north of Base Line Road and 1/4 mile south of Highland Avenue and extends from the ;western Rancho Cucamonga City Limits east to Palm Drive, iurt east of Haven Avenue, a distance of 2.89 miles. That portion of 19th Street east of Haven is designated as State Route 30. ANALYSIS: Ordinance 144 states that numerical street names are unacceptable and encourages the use of names of trees for east/ west streets. F ITEM D J Street Name Change for 19th Street July 8, 1981 Pane Twn The proposed change is in accordance with Section 5 of Ordinance 144 and can be Justified by the following findings: A. It is consistent with the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan. B. It is consistent with the adopted Circulation Element. C. It will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment. 0. It is deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, and general welfare. E. "Olive Street" has historical significance for Rancho Cucamonga. The San Bernardino County Assessor's maps still Ind -sate the name in parentheses. Potential impacts and issues are outlined below: Major Impacts o Currently there are 516 residences, of which 420 are located in Sunscape I and II, as well as 65 businesses located along 19th Street that would necessitate address corrections. Minor Impacts e There is a street named "Olive Way" located in the vicinity of Chaffey College. It is a loop street off of Haven Avenue south of Wilson Avenue. o There are 20 street name scans that would require replacement as follows: 16 single blades at. $27.50 each 2 posts with 2 blades at $80.00 each 2 overhead signs at 14200 each The total cost would" be $800.00,plus labor. 0 Maps ww1143 have to be corrected. 1 El Street Name Change for 19th Street July 8, 1981 Donn '� Minor Impacts, Contd. o Utility companies and emergency servicas would have to be notified of the name change. o The street name would change back to 19th Street at the Upland City Limits. CORRESPOWDENCE: On June 26, 1981, a public hearing notice was ad- vert— d in the Daily Report newspaper. A total of 45 notices were posted at 300 foot intervals along 19th Street, and written notice was sent to the Post Office, County Recorder, Fire District, Sheriff's Department, California Department of Transportation and City of Upland Engineering Office. To date, no correspondence has been received. However, there have been several phone calls from concerned residents. Staff has spoken with CALTRANS and they did not indicate any problems. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing and consider all the aspects of this proposal. A Resolution is attached for your consideration, if the Commission concurs on the proposal. ubmitted, P1 BKH:AJT:jr Attachments: Map Resolution of Approv&l 4c RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPP.OVAL OF STREET NAME CHANGE NO. 81 -01 REQUESTING A NAME CHANGE FROM 19TH STREET TO OLIVE STREET FROM THE WESTERN RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY LIMITS EAST TO ITS TER- MINUS AT PALM DRIVE. WHEREAS, on the 8th day of July 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 61.854 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, on the 20th day of May, 1981, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 144, establishing Street Naming Policy for Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, the City Council has initiated the request for a Street Name Change for 19th Street Dursuant to Section 3.A.3 of Ordinance No. 144; and Wntntn :. the Planning Division has prepared a report discussing the justification tot the change, recommending a replacement name and discussing the impact of the proposed change; 0 NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. Ordinance No. 144 states that numerical street names are unacceptable; 2. The prevailing theme is to name east -west street after trees; 3. The proposed name "Olive" has historical significance for Rancho Cucamonga; in fact the San Bernardino County Assessor's maps still reference that name in parentheses; 4. The proposed change would not create significant adverse impacts on the environment; 5. The proposed change is consistent with the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan; G. The proposed change is consistent with the adopted Circulation Element; 7. The street name change is deemed necessary in order to protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare. i71. E. E U Resolution No. Page 2 Nnw TwPorpnor RP TT RFGN urn- 1. That pursuant to Section 65350 - 65855 of the California Government Code, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 8th day of July, 1981 of Street Name Change Nu. 81 -01; 2. That the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Street Name Change No. 81 -01; 3. That the Planning Commission recommends that Street Name Change No. 81 -01 be effective on November 1, 1981; 4. That a certified copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of July, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES NOES: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: L \A- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM ign DATE: July 8, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10210 - LAWLOR - A custom lot subdivision- of 46 acres into 8 lots comprising 36 units in the R- 1- 20,000 zone and R -1 -14 acre zone generally located on the north side of Almond between Sapphire and Turquoise - APN 200 -19 -07 BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval of a custom lot subdivision as described above. ?'t has re- cently come to the attention of Staff that the westerly por- tion of the tract was incorrectly identified by the City Zoning Maps as being i,A A. - i- 1n,000 square foot zone and was a zone 'R -1 -T4 cre by the County in 1974. Theref e a e requ i ontinuance of this item to the u ust 12 1981 agenda to allow the applicant time to filA 7 hange application to resolve this problem. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Com- mission continue the public hearing to August 12, 1981. Resfpectfully submitted, 1E37 , BKH:DC:jr ITEM E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ST ASF REPORT DATE July 8, 1981 ly TO: Planning Commission FROM- Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Joe Stofa, Assistant Civil Engineer SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT'AND PARCEL MAP ine aivision oT ss.i acres into 12 parcel for industrial use loca ted north of 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenue INTRODUCTION: This subdivision consists of Lot 16 of Parcel Map 4749. The su div6 ision, as proposed, provides for 12 parcels for industriav use. The site is bounded at the northwest by an existing winery, at the west by the Day Creek Channel and at the east by Edison's power generating plant and a vacant land for which a parcel map (Parcel Map 6658) has recently been approved. The proposed 7th Street runs through this project and the align- ment is set to bypass the existing winery and the power plant. Presently, the owner of the vacant parcel to the east (Parcel Map 6658) is discussing with the City Engineer some industrial /cononercial development proposals for the parcel which calls for developments on large parcels of land. <ue to this proposal and the location of the power plant, it is the opinion of the City Engineer that the proposed 7th Street may be reclassified downwards to industrial local street from Day Creek to eastward with a pro- vision to upgrade it in the future if need arises. Such condition has been incorporated in the City Engineer's Report for the project. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Al <o attached for your review and consideration is Part I. of the Inita Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the Environmental Checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Intial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the tentative map be approved, subject to the City Engineer's Report, and that a Negative Declaration be issued. A resolution is attached to provide for apprzval should the Commission concur. fetes fully LBH': S-jaa Attachments ITEM F V, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Richard Newton TENTATIVE MAP NO. PM 5697 LOCATION: Santa Anita Avenue - North of Fourth Street DATE FILED: 2/19/80 NUMBER OF LOTS: 12 _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 16 of Parcel Map 4749 RECEIPT NUMBER: 06206 FEE. ZONE: M-2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: J. Richard Newton GROSS ACREAGE: 33.7 ADDRESS: 624 West "I" Street MINIMUM LOT AREA: Ontario, CA 91762 MINI14UM LOT FRONTAGE: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE # 0 Westmont Properties 16111 Morrison Street 213/789 -3904 Encino, CA 91316 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications X 1. Dedication by final map of ail interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shorn on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by :inal map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on _ Corner P/L radius required on Other 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: 4. Street vacation required for: 5. toaster Plan of Streets revision required or: 6. The following perimeter intersections require rea �'gnment as follows: RCE 20 0 Improvements TENTATIVE MAP N0. 5697 Rage 2 (Bonding is required prior tog] Recording for all rar" is ) 0 gu i id i:iy {ierii,i L i;ir j X 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, ore drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets. 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: �`— *in:_ludino landscaninc and irrigation on meter STREET NAME CURB & I GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WAIK DRIVE APPR. STP.E TRFES TR- EET MEDIAN LIGHTS _j_ISLAND* OTHER I X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.ccnduit. All utilities are to be underground. X 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tio:rs and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all constructien plans for drainage and Street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County .Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underqround service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: _ 17. The following specific dimensions, i.e., cul-de-sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: _ 18. The following existing streets are substandard- They will require: Approvals and Fees X 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 5697 Page 3 ;f. y_ 21. Permits from other agencies will.be required as follows:. A. Caltrans, for: _X B. City: C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenc.es are over 5 deep: X E. Cucamonga County Water District: X F. Other: Flood Control District far any encroachment Map Control _ 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map:_ x_ 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the rig t -of -way me accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs c arificai.on as follows: _ 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. Parcel Map Waiver ?8. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for ) 0 Building permit for_ ) X 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ! ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. Zone A0. X 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. X Such flo.•r may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. X 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewa:k at all downstream curb returns. _ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_ _ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will e required to assess impact o increased runoff . Is . RCE 20 . TENTATIVE MAP NO. 1621 Page 4 Miscellaneous X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. X 36. Noise 'impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired X 39. Prope.- grading and erosion control, including the preventation of sedimenta -' tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. X 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for.the follow - 'ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. X 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make 'the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. X 43. At the time of Final 44ep submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lot> fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. Dedication of additional 10' right-of-way on Santa Anita Avenue contiguous to project boundary shall . be required. X 46. Contri ci ation i m rovement of Da Crete ek Chann mav,�e required of each ar �udD& of 4�u�T7i— p— X 47. ISrainag�e of 77t reet shall be redesigned to drair. onto r.•a Anita Avenue. X 48. The width of pavc}nent of 7th Street east of Santa Anita Avenue may be reduced - to 44' at the discretion of the City Engineer. The determination shall be made at the time of construction permit. X 49. Provide a temporary street connection between the proposed 7th Street and the bridge on Day Creek Channel for fire access. 1 RCE 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: �ARCAEZ -MAP AN INDUSTRIAL SWEIDIVISION . . .............. ITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA _Alrmlw ............ awl I.El MAP 110 4r ;=-�4' w1nery MO O1.0. .52 aae FP 10 w q ac :A ALM. 449 MVI MIS 41 09 J. vla coma M. 511. pm. W" an lnalYNM1 III b..'s gmss cj To 2,wIl "I. vM wMla i.ite.aa Q""cn 3-30 low m Nil 011" 7 319 «ne! 0591, 4Z .1 *cc 2.50 PC mt. 20.43 339 1255 38 Mamet tae. RESOLUTION NO. LIA A. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPKUVIVU PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5697 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP f0. 5697 LOCATED ON SANTA ANITA AVENUE NORTH OF FOURTH STREET. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 5697, submitted by Westmont Properties and consisting of 12 parcels, located on Santa Anita Avenue north of Fourth Street, being a division of Lot 16 of Farces Map 4749; and, WHEREAS, on Februar,V 19, 1980, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described tentative map and 'WHEREAS, on July 8, 1981, the Planning Commi,sion held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. N0VI, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNIN, COMMISSION RESOLVED .".S FOLL0WS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistert with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed developmen�. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantia environmental damage, public health proilems or have adverse affects oa abutti,g property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declaration is issued on July 8, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map Nu. 5397 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report )ertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 198 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 Resolution No. Page 7_ ATTEST: Secretary u the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission 'he City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of July, 1931, by the following vote -to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: n \�J 3 PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessiant 'Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of.this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be hea-d. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, Z) The project will have an environmental im;>act and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: TRACT U345 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: J. RICBrr_TM 6e+4 -i�cst I- 8?.Yeet Oat�rt® 9�76P Phone (710 986 8707 — NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONr OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: _ WES'Tt ONT PROPERTIES 1611 Morrisoa Street, lhehw Calif. Att: Saul Haiaovitz ( 213) 789 3904 ILDCATION OF PROJECT (S-EIRE-ET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) North of end of Santa Anita Avemm. Between Rochester bMIMe Wd Etivsnda Avenue. i 11 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES ANn THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: State of ' 3— Ornia Real Estate Board. Saul Bermardino Blood Cmtrol. 9 iii . _ ,• 11345 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessiant 'Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of.this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be hea-d. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, Z) The project will have an environmental im;>act and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: TRACT U345 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: J. RICBrr_TM 6e+4 -i�cst I- 8?.Yeet Oat�rt® 9�76P Phone (710 986 8707 — NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONr OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: _ WES'Tt ONT PROPERTIES 1611 Morrisoa Street, lhehw Calif. Att: Saul Haiaovitz ( 213) 789 3904 ILDCATION OF PROJECT (S-EIRE-ET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) North of end of Santa Anita Avemm. Between Rochester bMIMe Wd Etivsnda Avenue. i 11 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES ANn THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: State of ' 3— Ornia Real Estate Board. Saul Bermardino Blood Cmtrol. 9 iii PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: She construction of 12 lots, verging in _ area from 3�.1 acres to 3.97 acres to be used for industrial 1purposes. This will include curb: ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Acreage 33.7 gross. go build ev; are coate=plated—U].�Iia-pbase- DESCRIBE THE EN'JIRONEiE TE`A'L SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOIZYATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY . EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Present use is sbandonded vineyard. There are no structures on the site. Onlv rodents habitat the area. Surrounding use is vinticalture. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series' of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? _clone. Y A 4 L r� �' WILL THIS PI10.7rCT: r -1 3 YES_. NO _ J1_ X` 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? On Parcel 3 Orly. Will x-Equire filling. No adverse effect. x 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? Create a substantial change in %remand for municipal services (police, water, sewage, etc.)? Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? Remove any existing trees? How many? Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: #1 Development will control random flooding of this area and channel. run -oft into svaroved areas. IMPORTANT: I£ the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of nay knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the DeveLop At Review Committee. Date Jan 20, 1980 3 Title LA #2386. E ,E �.J nATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCIiO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 30, 1981 Planning Commission Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician 91 MAP NO. 6882 - A aivision of 7.196 acres into 5 parcels wit exist ng conmercial building located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Carnelian Avenue INTRODUCTION: The developer, Oakview, is submitting Parcel Map 6862 for financing annic — ownership purpo.3es to divide an existing shopping centEr into five (5) parcels. All buildings shown on the tentative map and all street improvements are built. All surrounding land is developed as R -1 or shopping centers. The large (1.1 acre) strip of land to the south is occupied by a residence and cannot be further sub- divided under present regulations. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Inital Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the environ- ment as a result of the proposed subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the tentative map be approved, subject to the Engineer's Report, and that a Negative Declaration be issued. A resolution is attached to provide for approval should the Commission concur. 11 v subm i LBH:W.. jaa Attachments ITEM G CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Oakview, A Limited Partnership TENTATIVE MAP N0. 6882 LOCATInN: Southeast corner of 19th Street and DATE FILED: 6/1/81 Carnelian NUMBER OF LOTS: 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Portion of Lot 1, Black 16, RECEIPT NUMBER: 11535 of Cucamonga Homestead Association, Lands as FEE: 32.50.00 ZONE: TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Hall & Foreman GROSS ACREAGE: ADDRESS: 3186 -L Airway Ave. 7.196 acres MINIMUM LOT AREA: Costa Mesa, C4 92626 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE i 0 Oakview, A Limited Partners nip 630 The City Drive South 971 -2854 Orange, CA 92668 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications _ 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on _ additional feet on additional feet on Corner P/L radius required on Other 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: — 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. .a2 Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior toil Recording for ) ❑ Building permit for ) _ 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter. A.C. pavement, sidewalk; one drive approach per lot, park-day trees and street lights) on all interior streets. 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: -- * inrludinn landsranina and irrigation on meter STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DRIVE APPR_ STREET TREES STREET LIGHTS MEDIAN ISLAND* OTHER 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. _ 10. Prov4de all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.condu t. All utilities {� are to be underground. _ 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. 12_ Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. _ 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Compar.y the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be uecorative poles with underqround service. lb. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The fo owing speci tc dimensions, i.e., cu -de -sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: _ 13. The to lowing existing streets are substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees X 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ -- ' ro�XXf& id�Cfl( M: dRwaXRaxO() J( XB ,k9(�fIX�CQ�iXKNRXi4XYXOfX3tJ�- � X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from theta. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP N0. 6gR7 Page S E 21. Fermits from other agencies wiii be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans, for: _ B. City: _ C. County Dust Abatement District: _ D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep: _ E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Map Control _ 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro -' vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located _ 26. The boundary of the Tentative r1ap needs clarification as follows: ^_ 2:. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title e>. lanation required. Parcel Map Waiver _ 28. Information submitted at the time of upplica.tion is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to 0 Recording for ) 0 Building permit for ) _ 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. _ 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. _ 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. _ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_ _ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will a require to assess impac o increased runoff. RCE 20 i TENTATIVE MAP NO. 6882 E Page 4 Miscellaneous 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: 39. Proper grading and erosion contro including the preventation of sedimerta- ` tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. for the follow- 40. ' A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site the soils report furnished to the Building Division ing reasons: A copy of prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are Vater requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County capacity. Permits will District will be asked to certify the availability of not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determinatio -n, in accordance with Section _ 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and d- _veilnment of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and comple�e exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- final ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the to said determina- map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection tion within the specified time limits of said Section. Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse X 43. At the time of calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. to drive approach per street. Multipl.e lots 44. Development shall be limited one fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. Show compliance w%th Uniform Building Code fire resistance requirements for exterior wall construction of all buildings, to the satisfaction of the Building official, prior to recordation of the parcel map. to X 46. Reciprocal easements and maintenance shall be provided ensuring access all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas, and shall be recorded X 47. concurrent with the map. Street trees that are dead or dying must be replaced prior to recordation of the final map. Trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallon and shall be installed X 48. per Engineering Standard No. 605. Cucamonga County Water District's watermain easements shall be delineated on the map. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER yell By. RCE 20 0, i E .1 r ra ocl.vc /cm en Iycv ml tr.•az •L s s - -n— J 6 ~ u m enaYL.«Yn V' —r / I yr is ' � T r. 3 r � I LrLN Ttl -• }� o, b •'.yam '_- .. I r �4. O y - L_ -_J y ; aaw o . mel i- i•,.v t� ®. ..J fm LAS co up� i 12O 4 CL hi rn Z Ld F__ 3 e a r a „Ti E �?iai: "rt�� • 1. . A F �Y ;CFA 0�2± = F� :Ni ej ^jti =YY 7�fw2�t,li2i L. J, RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNIG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 6882 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1.10. 6882) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 19TH STREET AND CARNELIAN AVENUE. WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 6882, submitted by Oakview and con!zistinq cr 5 parcels, located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Ca nelian Avenue, being a division of a portion of Lot 1, Block 16, of Cucamonga Homestead Assoc. Lands as recorded in Book 6, page 46 of San Bernardino County; and, WHEREAS, on June 1, 1981, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on July 8, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - des -ibed map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision i= consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and Negative Declarat in is issued on July 8, 1981. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 6882 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman m Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foresoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of July, 1981, by the following vote -to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 u r LJ 1]J El CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM`:4 INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT 1IRTFO {MATION SHEET - T:> be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $60.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be hea=d. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further infornation concerning the proposed project_ PROJECT TITLE: ALTA LOMA CENTER APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: OAKVIEW, A LTD.PARTNER- SHIP BY' IPS COMPANY A GENERAL PARTNER. 630 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE '150 ORANGE CA 92668 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: GEORGE D. SHAMBECK 3186 -L AIRWAY AVENUE, COSTA MESA, CA 92626 IACATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AIe'P . SSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 6700 CARNELIAN ST. AP 202- 541 -22 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OTHER PER7•1ITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING NONE � -o REGIONAL, STATE SUCH PERMITS: AND r l PROJECT DESICIZIPTION _ DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: SHOPPING CENTER ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AA'D SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF A*IY' pR b; Ty nocn : i o� A('RFS BUILDING ARE; 55.6f1(i SO ,FT_ DESCRIBE THE ENVIRO T*11Z rAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING j- ,IMPI +LATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING rROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTI \G STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSPRY SHEETS) THE PROJFrT T� S �ttRRFr:71 Y is ct inac: r� `ENTER AND NO NEW IMPROVEMENTS ARE ANTICIPATED. THE TENTATIVE MAP 1S BEING PROCESSED TO COMPLY WITH THE STATE SUBDIVISION OWNERSHIP PURPOSES ONLY Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have s=gni£ican> environmental impact? N/A I -2 El r WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ X 1, 'Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? x_ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! _ X 4, Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? E 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables -Dr explosives? Explanat ion of any YES answers above: N/A _ IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATMN: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached erhibi.ts present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief_ I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adeauate evaulation can be Review Committer °e. Date 6 -1 -81 _ Signatu: T_ Title ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT OF HALL S FOREMA141, INC. pl l� DATE: my E TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: HO CUCAMONGA REPORT PORT Members of the Planning Commission Barry r,. Hogan, City Planner Michael Uairin, Senior Planner BACKGROUND: Over the past several months, the Planning Commission has been rev'ewing and approving residential developments subject to certain conditions and standards which the Commission has found neces- sary to protect the genera; pubiic:hea'ith, safety, and welfare. We have found that many of the concerns and issues relative to buffering between single and multiple family developments are similar. There- fore, at the dirpr lvn of the Planning Commission. Staff has prepared a Resolution for the Commission's consideration which sets Forth buf- fering standards. The major concern of the Commission in recent meetings was the location Of' two story multiple family units adjacent to single family homes. The Zoning Ordinance requires a rear yard setback of 20 feet. Rather than prohibiting two story units adjacent to single family homes, Staff is recommending that any two story units be set back a minimum of 35 feet and that additional setbacks be provided should additional stories be desired. In addition to the height requirement, Staff is also suggesting buffering techniques regarding barriers and landscaping. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider The attached Resolution and Standards and adopt the Resolution if this complies with the desires of the Commission. spectfylly submitted, / +R3ARR i K. 0 Eity �lanneri // � SI�FI: MU: jr J Attachment: Resnlution of Approval ITEM I 1 J RESOLUTION RO. f u A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SETTING FORTH STANDARDS FOR BUFFERING 1 BETWEEN MULTIPLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS AND SINGLE FA14ILY DEVELOPMENTS. WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga finds that standards are necessary to create appropriate bufferings between single and multiple family developments; and, W4EREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission finds that such standards are necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby establishes the following buffering standards between single family and multiple family developments: 1. Two story multipl family units shall be setback a minimum of thirty -five (35 feet from an., single family zone boundary or area eneral planned for single family development. 2. Multiple family units exceeding two stories shall be setback an additional foot for each additional foot in height, up to a maximum of 100 fret, when abutting a single family zone boundary or area general planned for single family development. 3. A solid six (6) foot fence, wall, berm or combination thereof shall be placed at the boundary to buffer the single and multiple developments. Height shall be measured from the highest finished grade. In no case shall a wall or fence exceed 10' in height. 4. A dense 10' wide landscaped planter consisting of minimum 15 gallon size trees and shrubs, shall be placed within the landscape buffer. APPROVED AiiO ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1981. PLAi^IING COMMISSION OF ':.r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: ® ?,„ Secretary of the Planning Commission L':, C W, Rest'. :vn No.. Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho L*,,camonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of July, 1981 by the following vote to- v: � t: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: RESENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT i U,1T[: July 8, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Con nission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner SUBJECT: SIDEWALK RESOLUTION - Establishment of standards for the location and development of sidewalks in the Resi- dentia', Commercial and Industrial Areas of the City ABSTRACT: As the Planning Commission will recall, in the recent past there has been considerable discussion over ;-here sidewalks should be provided in residential and industrial areas. We felt it would be in the best interest of the City to resolve the question through adoption of a Resolution establishing the location and development of sidewalks. Approval is recommended. DISCUSSION: For Pesidential: In the Rural /Equestrian Area, north of Banyan, side- - walks on major and north /south streets should be on one side only. That would be streets suet, as Banyan, Wilson, Hillsid3, Carnelian, Sapphire, Hermosa, Beryl, Archibald, etc. Additional sidewalks would be required on routes tr schools on one side of the street as recommended by tl-� City Planner and the City Engineer and approved by the Planning Commission. For areas south of the Rural /Equestrian Area, except for Terra Vista, Victoria and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, sidewalks would be required throughout. For Industrial: The Industrial Specific Plan designates sidewalks on both sides of arterials such as Haven, Hellman, Milliken, Rochester, etc., and sidewalks on ofie side for collector streets. Sidewalks in other locations would be required on one side of the street in areas that are determined to be a route to transportation stops, future or existing. ITEM J Sidewalk Resolution July 0, 1981 Page Two RECOMMENDATIO14: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution establishing location of sidewalks -in the Residential and Industrial Areas_ lly submitted, �FRR lac. H (; Ci y Plan" \,_! / BK :jr Attachment Resclu tion of Approval A E ' ;'ii RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING THE LOCATION OF SIDEWALKS WITHIN THE RURAL /EQUESTRIAN AREA AND INDUSTRIAL AREA. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is concerned with the ioc:cLcr of sidewalks in the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has spent a great deal of time and discussion over where sidewalks should be located and the purposes for sidewalks; and WHEREAS, it is the Planning Commission's desire to establish standards for the location of sidewalks in the rural /equestrian area and the industrial area. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby establish the following standards for the location of sidewalks: SECTION 1: Rural /Equestrian Area: Sidewalks shall be required on one side of the streets; Banyan, Hillside, Wilson, Haven, Hermosa, Archibald, Amethyst, Beryl, Carnelian, Sapphire7 Turquoise, Etiwanda, East, Highlar.i, 24th, Summit Avenues, and any other streets that may be added that are of the same classification as the aforementioned. For streets interior to the previously mentioned streets, sidewalks will be required on one side of the street on routes to school as determined by the City Planner and City Engineeer with the approval by the Planning Commission. SECTION 2: For Industrial: Sidewalks will be required in the industrial area, on both si es o the streets; Haven, Turner, Archibald, Hellman, Vineyard, Milliken, Rochester, New Rochester, Day Creek, Etiwanda, Arrow, Foothill, 6th, 4th Streets, and any other streets that would be added in the same classification as the aforementioned. Sidewalks will be required on one side of collector streets in the industrial area, and sidewalks on one side only, will be required at the discretion of the City Planner and City Engineer on streets that lead to existing transportation stops or proposed transportation stops. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commis�sinn I, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of July, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IJ 2 M n U CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 8, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vdirin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS BACKGROUND: Please find attached a list of the present committee appointments in which some changes are required. Presently there are nine Planning Commission Sub - committees of which four can be eliminated since those projects have been completed. Of the five remaining, Staff suggests that some changes may be necessary given the new chairmanship appointment. Chairman King's appointment to the Design Review Committee expires this month and should either be replaced or extended for an additional year. The new term would rrr until July 1, 1982. We would suggest changes in Commissioner King has taken Chairman. the Zoning Committee, since on the responsibilities of RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Com- mission review the Planning Commission appointments and make appropriate changes for the consensus of the Commission. pectflgily submitted, ARRY/K.'N i /ty Plan e BKN':MV:j Attachment: Planning Commission Appointments ITEM Y. 0 PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS Design Review Committee Sceranka (Jan.'82) King (July 181) Rempel (Alternate) Equestrian Advisory Committee Dahl Tolstoy (Alternate) Flood Control Committee King Tolstoy Zoning Committee Rempel King Tolstoy (Alternate) Etiwanda Advisory Committee Tolstoy *Chamber of Commerce Industrial Comm. Sceranka King *Citizens Advisory Committee Tolstoy Sceranka Rempel (Alternate) *Street Naming Committee Dahl Rempel *Fiscal Committee Sceranka King (Alternate) *Recommend elimination of committee since project is completed. C oil CITE' OF RANCHG CUCAMONGA . a PLANNING- COTNAMISSI`JN IZ AGENDA J� - 1977 WEDNESDAY JULY S, 1981 7:00 P.1-4. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9151 BASE LINE,.RANCHO CU;AMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempel Commissioner King Con .issioner Tolstoy Commissioner Sceranlca III. Approval of Minutes January 28, 1981 IV. Announcements V. Consca7. Calendar Ulf The following consent calendar items are expo ^_ted to be .routine and non- ^.ontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. if anyone has concern over any item, then it should be. removed For discussion. A. Rt�fIJ-ST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -41 WESTWAY INVESTMENTS - A time extension request for 6 mo. for an approved. light industrial complex, to be located on the south side of 3th Street, east of Hellman Avenue. B. REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSION FOR SITE APPROVAL NO. 80 -09 LUTHERAN CHURCH - A time extension request for 12 mo. for t -he develvipment of a church facility on 2.11 acres in the A -P zone located on the northwest corner of Haven and Banyan Avenue - APN 201- 341 -01 Vi. Public Hearings •'' The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may -,noire their opinion of the, related project. Please wait to be recognized by the chaff. -an and address the Commission from the Pu biic microphone b y giving your ur f name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to i�.: minutes per individual Zor each pro.loct. 1 L P Planning Commissioa Agenda -2- July 8, 1981 C. VARIANCE 140. 81 -02 - CHRISTIA14 - Request to permit construction of residence that will enrroach into front and rear yards on a 3,532 sq. ft. ivt in the R -3 zone located at 6969 Amethyst - APN 2152- 131 -04 0. OE - . J d'� 4 STREET NAME CHANGE FOR 19TH STREET, proposed to be Olive Street, an east-west running street from the Rancho Cucamonga City limits just west of Sapphire Street to its terminus at Palm Drive, a distan:e of approximately three (3) miles. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT FU. IUZiU LAWLOR - A custom of subdivon i isi of 46 acres nto lots comprising 36 units in the R- 1- 20,000 & R -1 -14 ac. zones generally located on the north side of Almo•td, between Sapphire and Turquoise - APN 200 - 191 -C7 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 5697 WESTMONT PROPERTIES - The division of 33.7 acres into ? parcels for Industrial use located north of 4th Street and Santa Anita Avenue - APN 229 - 283 -48 G. ENVI RU1VMtN 1 AL AJJtbJPItN i Awu rmstucL nmr rvv. vouG AKVi W - A division of 96 acres into 5 parcels with axis ±ing commercial building located at the southeast co• °rer of 19th Street and Carnelian Ave. APN 202 - 541 -22 n� 1H.1 INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PL VII. Old Business f; VIII New Business s" ft \tj I. 1.. RESOLUTION ON SIDEWALKS IX. Council Referrals X. Director's Reports K. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS �j �7 j' XI. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general 'public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. M. Upcoming Agenda XIII. Adjournment The Planning Cozzadssion has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. d ". TW 4 J • VV w�MCll �•I'r �/ Z >3 .f �5ell i -1 r <vn�tva y7ii � � a 1 r' i+ L4R". N QI -y N (Y y 3nNIAV a O 3 0 m W K 4 N a KY. 6 6 < u � W T " H r o� o H U QI 4 hN n N V CY .. � a C :il1V AUU'IIj W J F W S LL 4 ai J K Lu o 4 F N � •i • •-� C Izt �r��.n Y_1 W Y � � VUNVM,23 i� (Y y 3nNIAV a O 3 0 m W K 4 N a KY. 6 6 < u � W T " H r o� o H U CITY OF RANG ;HO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM lion FROM: Ari :::r H. Bridge n , Councilman /' //d SUBJECT: Street Name Chas.ge July 6, 1981 I urge the adoption of the resolution p:-oviding for the name changs from 19th Street to that of Olive. This was the or£ginei name of the roadway on all of the early maps of the Iona Tract and in common usage irr. the Ioemosa Community. The name 19th Street came about as a .:esxlt of County action and as has been the case so many times in our community, it was an arbitrary thing with no regard to the community traditions - desires. Nineteenth Street i-Z a proper name for this roadway through Upland, but is no more pertinent to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (or Claremrc.t for that matter) as would be calling Base Line by the name of 16th Street just because that fits the numbering system of Upland. In the original subdivision of the north -vest portion of our City, by Isaiah W. Heiman, the east --west streets were given the names of trees and the north -south streets the names of mine-als and gem atones. My feeling, and that of other long -time residents, is that insofar as is practicable, this theme in naming our streets ahoull bt continued. I recognize a measure of inconvenience for residents a:ad businesses presently on this street, but hope that there will be a quick acceptance and pride in our own heritage and a rejec:tLon of the County imposed, Upland street name. ARB:baa cc: City Council I i 9 n r O z Z i