No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/07/22 - Agenda PacketIv A. M. w. t4 A C T 1 0 N S Continued to 8 -12 -81 Approved 3 -0 -2 a I II III. IV V. rlw am CITY OF RAI*-X110 CUCArvloNCA. PLANNING -COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY JULY 22, 1981 7:00 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,-RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Commissioner Dahl X Commissioner Rempel X Commissioner King Excused Commissioner Tolstoy =used Commissioner Sceranka X Approval of Minutes February 5, 1981 Announcements Consent Calendar The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversia?. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, then it should be removed for discussion. - ,,.......A —j - „ uevviopmeni oT two indL:;triai buildings totaling 86,=64 square feet an 5.27 acres of land in the M -2 zone to be located on the northeast corr.sr of Jersey Blvd. and Vincent Avenue - APN 209 - 141 -42 Public Hearings The following items are public heazings in which concerned individuals may voice their, opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to r9 minutes per individual for each project. Planning Commission Agenda -2- July 22, 1981 Continued to 8 -12 -81 B. VARIANCE NO. 81 -02 - CHRISTIAN.- Request to permit construction of residence that will encroach into front and rear yards on a 3.532 sq. ft. lot in the R -3 zone located at 6969 Amethyst - APN 202- 131 -04 Approved 3 -0 -2 with recommendation that C. RFC /IEW THE DRAEL-- J, -L-AND rnN$InER APPRQM (TF THE DRAFT City Council adopt INOUSTP,IAL SPECj}IC PLAN WITH REVI;ION4 - The Specific Plan consists of detailed land use regulations and El standards for development in the Industrial Area. Public hearing will be held to take public comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Report and consider recommendation I or adoption of the Draft Industrial Specific Plan with any necessary revisions. Approved 3 -0 -2 n, ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 9658 - McCUTCHAN total residential eve opment of 25 jots cons.�_t ng of - single family residential dwelling units arranged as duplexes on 6.92 acres of land in the R -2 zone on the north side of 9th Street, between Raker ant. Maarvra Ave. APN 207- 251 -03 Approved 2 -1 -2 E. DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 79 -68 - LEWIS PROPERTIES - The Plannino Commission shalt be considering a change in the Conditions - of Approval for the development of a professional center to include a two -story office building totaling 33,696 sq. ft... and a bank totaling 7,500 sq. ft. in the C -1 zone located on the north side of Base Line, west of Archibald Avenue - APN 202- 161 -32 Approved 3 -0 -2 F 'nEEEVA EAR - (Reference Tentative Tract 11550 and Zone Change No. P0-11) - Consideration and review of an Environmental Impact Report (EAR) prepared for a residential condominium project consistir:g of 662 dwelling units on 65 acres of land generally located or, the south side of Wil ;on, about k mile east of Haven - APN 201- 191 -07 VII. Old Business G. RESOLUTION Continued ,- .,., ,. VIII. New Business Approved 3 -0 -2 with H. RESOLUTION ON EQUESTR1r.N ADVISORY COMMITTEE STANDARDS amendment to have City Council select ° its own member I• VACATION OF 7TH STREET AT CENTER I. Approved 3 -0 -2 IX. Council Referrals J. REPORT ON REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (Addition to Agenda) c� «TY OF f"A p RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ '= PLANNING C®MMISSI ®N AGE, ND WEDNESDAY JULY 22, 1981 7:00 P.M. LION'S PARK. COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 1. Fledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Commissioner Rempel Commissioner King Commissioner Tolstoy Commissioner Sceranka III. Approval of Minutes February 5, 1981 `• Lp� ? ;ft7 �"� IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non- ccntroversia2. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, then it should be removed for discussion. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOWNT RFVTFW Nn. Ri -' u.n•u- „�w�in� w - n ueveiupmeuT oT Two inoustriai euifaings totaling. 86,564 square feet cn 5.27 arses or land in the M -2 zone to be located on the northeast corner of Jersey Blvd. and Vincent Avenue - APN 209 - 141 -42 _:. VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. A21 such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per Individual for each project. lhCr � � UU � 'I b 5_4 e� am- � G-� l Planning Commission Agenda All 7EM L � ifll. VII -2- July 22, 1981 B. VARIANCE NO. 81 -02 - CHRISTIAN - Request to permit construction of residence that will encroach into front and rear yards on a 3.532 sq. ft. lot in the R-3 zone located at 6969 Amethyst - APN 202 - 131 -04 C. REVIEW THE DRAE'LE_ I _ R.. ANg_C.QNSIDFBr9P ' DRAFT MM"L p F P {,Qpy�+IT' �yjSiONS - he Specific Piad consists of detailed land use regulations and standards for development in the Industrial Area. Public hearing will be held to take public comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Report and consider recommendation for adoption of the Draft Industrial Specific Plan .with, any necessary revisions. n. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 10.10 TENTATIVE TRACT WAO - McCUTCHAN A totat resloentlat development of zF sots consisting of 5z single family residential dwelling units arranged as duplexes on 6.92 acres of land in the R -2 zone on the north side of 9th Street, between Raker and MaOrone Ave. APN 207 - 251 -03 DIRECTOR REVIEW NO. 7948 - LEWIS PROPERTIES — The Planning lamm ssion shall-be considering a change in the Conditions of Approval for the development of a professional center tom,, include a two -story office building totaling 33,696 sq. ft. and a bank totaling 7,500 sq. ft. in the C -1 zone located on the north side of Base Line, west of Archibald Avenue - APN 202 - 161 -32 F NEEVA EIR - (Reference Tentative Tract 11550 and Tone Change No. 80 -11) - Consideration and review of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for a residential condominium project consisting of 662 dwelling units on 65 acres of land generally located on the south side of Wilson, about 11 mile east of Haven - APN 201 - 191 -07 Old Business G. RESOLUTI, FAMILY A' New Business H. RESOLUTION ON EQUESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE' STANDARDS VACATION OF 7TH STREET AT CENTER Ix. Council Referrals III Rio AOL E Punning Commission Agenda -3- July 22, 1981 X. Director's Reports XI. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. XII. Upcomong Agenda XIII. Adjournment The planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 12:00 p.m_ adjournment time. Yf items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. E r >j E , . I ., CITY OF RANCHO CUCA140NGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Regular Meeting February 5, 1981 CALL TO ORDER Vice- chairzc -in, Jeff Sceranka, called the adjourned regular City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission meeting. held at the Lion's Park Community Centel, 5161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, to order at 7:07 p.m. r- ollcm;ing the call to order, Vice- chairman, Sceranka led the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Jeffrey King, Herman Rempel, Peter Tolstoy, Jeff Sceranka ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl (Excused) STAFF PRESENT: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner; Ted Hopson, City Attorney; Joan Kruse, Secretary; Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Mr. Lam, Director of Community Development, explained the agenda stating that the EIR for the Victoria Project had been continued from the previous meeting of February 2, 1981. He then went into a recap of the Victoria Plan to date. He also explained that because the General Plan has progressed, it was now possible to gc on with the Victoria Planned Community 'searing. Mr. Hogan, City Planner, provided background for the discussion explaining that this agenda is a compilation of reports that had been prepared for the Planning Commission's review. Mr. Hogan followed with a recap of the staff reports relative to land use. circulation, parks and open space. Commissioner Sceranka asked if there was a preference by the Commission to go on to the next section or deal with this section before they go on to another. Commissioner king asked Mr. Hogan to discuss the adjustments made to density. Mr. Hogan replied that there were changes to the boundary in the Planned Community area resulting in a reduction of units from 98 ?O to 8924. The total acres of residential were changed from 1035 to 851 -. Mr. Hogan indicated that the area near the Pacific Electric Railroad, Flood Control Channel, lumber yard, and the area south of Base ".ine would have to be adju,:ted. Commissioner King stated that because of boundary changes density has been reduced. He wanted to know how much more was the result of Ceneral Plar. changes and asked for an estimate. 1. Mr. Hogan replied that he could. not give him an estimate at the moment but could get the figures for him. Commissicner Tolstoy also asked for these figures. Further, he thought it would be good to have them broken out of the total. Vice - chairman Sceranka opened the public hearing. Mr. John Scheib, representing the Myohoji Temple, stated that prior to the cessation of meetings in November, it had been planned that they would be meeting with the applicant. He indicated that they had met and th--rc :.e-e n _ X,en.,!es of approach to learri_ng the Temple area spared of traffic and noise encroachment resulting from this development. He restated the necessity for a perimeter road, and careful st+mdy of its placement because of the eucalyptus trees along the west boundary. He also indicated that perimeter landscaping would be necessary. Mr. Scheib asked what the uses would be under the regional - related category and how land development would affect the Temple. He stated that although he is interested in the perimeter question his main concern was the west perimeter. Mr. John Lyons, 11984 Dorset, Stiwanda, stated that his concern is that Rochester will be opened through to Church. He further stated that people living in this area would not like to see this happen. Mr. Gary Frye, 9613 Arrow Hwy., Rancho Cucamongp, stated that it was their intention to come back on the 26th of February to clarify those areas relative to land use and did not have comments on these areas specifically at this time. Mr. Frye commented that he felt the question on regional- -elated uses was one of clarification, not so much on what these uses would be, but rather, on traffic management for this use. He felt that this would be done and asked what kind of detail staff wants them to come back with on regional - related uses. He indicated that the portion of the E1R that deals with regional - related uses could be found on pages 154 -156 and if more was wanted he felt that it could be related to traffic. He asked for clarification on this point. Mr. Frye also asked for clarification on the buffering along Base Liuc Road relative to conmiercial uses and stated that he was not sure they could stipulate how that property will be after development. He talked about the Planned Community boundary map and the change of designation of land use east of Victoria Parkway. He stated that they will come back on the treatment of Highland Avenue but indicated that they felt it would be given a rural flavor. Mr. Lam commented on Base Line Road indicating that there should probably be some adjustment on the higher density there. Further, that there was a question on whether the density on Ctiwanda Avenue would affect Base Line and asked if the Planning Commission was still interested in seeing the lay out along Base Line. Planning Commission Minutes -2- February 5, 1981 E I.] 13 Mr. Hogan indicated his concern with how design uses along Base Line would coincide with the design if the commercial center. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he felt that the design would be dictated by the planned community standards, even if it was not in the planned community. He indicated that the commercial center along Victoria Parkway could be designed to have a rural. armosphere and thought that would be an excellent theme. Commissioner King stated that he did not agree with Commissiorer Tolstoy on both pcint%a. He felt that on both Etiwanda and Base Line it was un- necessary to sae what treatment would be given at this point in time. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he could not imagine failing to look at how things occur right outside of the Victoria Planned Community boundary. Further, that even if the Planning Commission is rot obliged at this point to look at the perimeter, they should be. Commissioner Rempel stated that he was in agreement with Commissioner Ring; however, he stated that some kind of design has to be blocked out. On the shopping center, he felt that a theme design should be submitted and it would be well fol: the Planning Commission to make some plan to see how ideas are going. Mr.. Lam asked if what the Commission meant was some graphic displays to see how certain design elements could be transition.ed. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he thought it would be important to see how it would relate to the planned community especially along Base Line. He further stated that a new character is being assigned to Base Line and the Commission needs to see what they are doing to it. Commissioner Sceranka stated that pages 180 -181 show vignettes and how density relates and translates. He thought that Mr. Frye could point out other vignettes. Mr. Hogan stated that pages 79 -83 have an illustrative concept plan in detail and that page 83 is a more simplistic version for the commercial center. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he would like to see a typical perspective as you would then know what you are going to get. if the design was not coming through, they could then tell the applicant to rethink it. He indicated that it would be important to nave Day Creek Boulevard, Highland, Base Line, and Foothill done and that all these areas were not included. Commissioner Sceranka asked, if in terms of Day Creek, the commission was looking at the edge treatment and exterior of the projert. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he was interested In the exterior edges along Day Creek Boulevard, Milliken and Base Line. Planning Commission Minutes -3- February 5, 1981 Mr. Hogan stated that this would give the Commission an idea of what_ the buildings would look like with design and landscaping. Commissioner Tolstoy . agreed and stated that it would nave to be to scale. Mr. Frye stated that they would be happy to accommodate the Planning Commission. He then spoke about the land use and zoning. He indicated that there are some things within the regional center that could change depending on the development all around it. Further., that he did not want to spend a lot of time and money today on something now that still had the possibility of changing. Mr. Frye stated that they would in- corporate a theme in the text to conform to whatever the Planning Commission desired. On pages 158 -152, Mr. Frye stated that he wanted to establish concurrence in landscaping approach and what trees would be used internally and externally. Mr. Frye spoke about the entrance treatment that would allow people to know they were making a transition into Victoria, ae they go along the street. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it really doesn't show what the character would be along the street and does not relate to how it would transition. Mr. Frye replied that it would depend on who develops first along Base Line and part of the answer is on Page 157. Commissioner Sr_eranka stated that he had a serious question about going into the plan in det .,il. He stated that he is having trouble with getting into that level. of detail at this time. Commissioner Rempel stated that Mr. Frye has no control over the last 1000' along Base Line and so can really show it. Mr. Frye stated that this would almost be like a site plan review. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if he could make one more stab and stated that you don't have control over the last 1600 feet, but what if someone comes in and says he would like to develop it. When the Planning Commission reviews the plan they need to see if it will properly relate. Mr. Don Tomkins of SWA stated that if the Commission was concerned with an inconsistency gap, that might be a problem. If the two planned areas are consistent, the Commission should be able to get detail and specifics in the treatment that will be used. Mr. Frye asked if Commissioner Tolstoy was looking at specific plans and material. Planning Commisson Minutes -4- February 5, 1?81 E E ri F7' I LJ Commissioner Tolstoy replied that he was pretty sure it would be this way but was concerned with block walls, mounding or columnar type walls. Mr. Hogan asked Commissioner Tolstoy to look at page 139 to see if that is what he wanted. Commissioner Tolstoy replied that this is wl•at he wanted because you can then look to what proposal is being submitted to see how it will match. Mr. Frye stated that it will not be effective in this planned community but should go into the Etiwanda Specific Plan. There was further discussion relative to the edge condition and how this would follow along Etiwanda Avenue, Base Line and that intersect;on. Mr. Hogan went into the circula ".on portion of the Victoria Planned Community and reviewed the four items that were presented in the staff report. Pe discussed the "A" land uses and looped streets stating that this could be resolved through more illustrative planning. Commissioner King stated that he had a couple of additions --- the Church Street aspect and his concern with Day Creek Boulc.ard at the i_ntersectton of Foothill Boulevard. He stated that he wished to have this issue addressed. Mr.. Hogan replied that the City Engineer, in a previous report, had indicated that this area needs to be looked at further through more detailed studies. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would like to see the type and traffic flow from the project to the rest of the community. Further, that them: has been a lot of discussion about work traffic, etc. and felt that the outlying areas also needed to be addressed. Commissioner Tolstoy hoped that we have made a commitment on Etiwanda Avenue and that there was a need to know how traffic thr..re will be handled along the east side. Commissioner Sceranka expressed his concern about the impact of traffic both on the east and west side of Etiwanda Avenue and alonk Ease Line. Mr. John Lyons came forward and asked about the corner of Rochester and Foothill. He wanted to know if a traffic signal could be installed there. He reiterated that he was against opening Church Street to Rochester but that if it was, he hoped that it would become a signalized inr_er &ection. Vice- chairman Sceranka asked that Mr. Lyons meet and discuss this with City Staff. Planning Commission Minutes -5- February 5, 1981 Commissioner Tolstoy asked if in light of all the Ciscussion on Church Street traversing the Fochester Tract, if it would be appropriate to discuss this at this time. Mr.. Kogan stated that they will come back to this issue. 8:25 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:35 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. Mr. Hogan reviewed the Parks and Open Space section of the Victoria. Planned Community as set forth in the staff. report. Mr. I.am added to this review wit1n philosophical questions to be resolved such as does the lake edge belong to only those people living adjacent to it or to the entire community. Commissioner King stated that he would like to know huw density reduction relates to parks. He felt that there needed to be some discussion of the deficiency and whether it is better to have community open space to combine it with other areas for a larger total area. Mr. Hogan stated that perhaps this is a philosophical discussion where you would have development credit for certain amenities. The credit, Mr. Hogan stated, is issued only after the developer has provided land or a fee. Mr. Hopson stated he thought Mr. King was asking if you change to reflect clustering or do you spread it out to an open area. Mr. Lam replied that this is something that this is a value judgement that the Planning Commission has to answer. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the lake front was thought to be for use of people within the City or just the Planned Community, Mr. Lam stated that from r:%e very beginning, staff considered the lakes for the residents of the .:tire City. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it adds an amenity for people all over the City to enjoy and that tht. ' don't need teete, totters or swings because just walking around the lake would be a treat. Further, that picnic tables and the like would be encouraged as recreational uses in this area. Commissioner Rempel agreed. Commissioner Sceranka stated that the issue of swimming in the lake also needed to be addressed and cited the way the City of Woodbridge developed such an area. Planning Commission Minutes -6- February 5, 1981 E Mr. Frye stated that they will come back with answers to the areas and questions raised by the Commission. He further stated that he agreed with Barry Hogan relative to the specil..-q and felt that more time needed to be spent on parks. He stated that they would prefer to come back with these answers on March 12. Mr. Hogan st :ed that infrastructure and design must also be reviewed. Commissioner Tolstoy asked about a timetable for development. Mr_ Nnonn rPn_l.ied that there is a schedule for phasing contained within the text. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the lakes ar.9 the village is built how much of Victoria Parkway will be built. Mr. Hogan replied that there will be conditions that will be included prior to submittal of the Planned Community to the City Council for approval. which will detail these requirements. Further, staff would not like to see only residential development going in without the parks being built. He stated that a phasing plan must be worked out for this and other amenities within the project. Mr. Hogan stated that the Commission will be provided with a detailed review and total picture of the Victoria Planned Community. Mr. Hogan then stated that February 26 ivas beer set for another meeting where answers and exhibits will be provided for those areas discussed at this meeting with the exception of Vie parks and open space areas. March 12 has been set for a meeting to discuss parks and open space infrastructure and design criteria with March 26 set to discuss regulations and implementation and the EIR. He indicated that if everything proceeds on schedule, April 9th would conceivably be the time when the project is recommended to the ..I Council £..r their action. Mr. Hogan further stated that February 17 was scheduled for the last General Plan meeting with_a recommendation to the City Counc *.1 from the Planning Commission. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Tal.stoy carried unanimously, to adopt the date- for the various meetings as proposed by Mr. Hogan. GENERAL PLAN - E.I.R. Mr. Hogan stated that a matrix had been prepared from the EIR for second portion of the February 9 meeting. He explained how mitigation measures would be _nr_orporated within the EIR and }•ave examples of development, run off, and percolation. Mr. Hogan then explained the SCAG 208 program, the federal requirements, and the standards which have been s %t to guarantee quality of water for this area_ Planning Commission Minutes -7- February S, 1981 t is r, Commissioner Tolstoy stated that when this :ommunity was originally formed it was primarily an agricultural connuaity which now has a new use. He further stated that the EIR w:to written to those problems that occurred in thz transition from. farmirg to an urban area. Mr. Tolstcy stated further that an EIR should not be written to meet the letter of the law and then to be put on a shelf atd forgotten. He indicated that it needs to be read again and to be k,:pt before the City Council, Community and Planning Con-- nission to be sure that something will be done about it. He felt that one of the first t',ings that must be addressed is keeping the mitigating factors b_fore t'',e Planning Commission.. the EIR is a good design tool.. He further indicated that what makes this EIR different than others is that it relies heavily on the General Plan text and the problem areas are mitigated through the text. Commi ,zsioner Tolstoy stated that he felt portion of the staff report should address this as projects come before the Commission. City Attorney Hopson stated that this is really a funciton of staff. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he did nct want to lose the import of what the EIR was saying in the years ahead. Mr. Hogan stated that the way to retain thLs is through creative, innovative use of the Zoning Ordinance in order to protect the City in three Areas. Further, that i-I the EIR is not going to bit used, it should not be in the General Plan. He indicated that this :.s a. general EIR for the whole City and perhaps at some future time specific EIRs may be required to develop more information for certain areas and suggested that focused EIRs could be used for this purpose. Commissioner Sceranka stated that the mcst significant issue :,a the sociological impact on the City that is bei.ig proposed by the General Plan inasmuch as the City is coming out of the agricultural pattern of the past into a urbanized community. Further, .hat dur "ng the past 3 -4 years there have been tremendous pattern changes in the sociological aspects of the community that have had a ne;;ative effect. Commissioner Sceranka stated that it is e&sy to sit on tle Planning Commission and discuss residential., industrial areas, the affordability of housing and rationalize these issues, but it does not mitigate the emotional and psychological impacts on their life styles. Further, that what the Planning Commission is saying is that growth is inevirable. Commissioner Sceranka indicated that there i; a need to address the impacts that occur with further growth and densities. He felt that these issues are not adequately addressed and stated that he would like to see more serious emphasis on this. Planning Commission M.nutes -8- February 5, 1981 Ll utW. 111. 0111.1 '1 ./ .11 111 I 1•11IA •'u1` 1 111 1 /,.,1 , ❑IIMI 1 .1nnl.l. 4.4 . I , IM.1 $,$Bill 1 111 1.1'• 1 ill I'NIMM .' 4:' I 1 Iwi ..I 1111111w. 11111 111' , 4 1 IINNI /�1 UIN i, 1 .1't.1rl . /•1 �1.1 1/ NIp.1 '71!1111 N.! 1 . u. .M 1gM41.1.1 .111 I. 1 ❑qNJ .111 ' 1.111.; 1q •1• 1•IdJ n/ ItlaH.l 1•'' '.IM,n•I , 1 i „111 � 1N' .111. 1 ul.l ..1�Lb1 UI .• $,, 1'• 1111 11111. 14 .1040$1 1.1 . 1.1.1. • 1 .nNW. 1'1 •.Itl 1 11.1 /IINN 1 .N... /.1 1.•.111 - ' 411 .till I . .1 1 .,, 11 .., 1 Ili :11 1'. ....1.1 •' d•1 f I,1. UI•, 1.1 • h1 rlll.l M•. tl 1. 11 IU 611 IW • 1'' ,,•.. ♦•It1 , .0 1 1 11 1.. L1 oill 'IM 6I40 al.. X11 -'N ,.u1• .1 1 4"m , .1 IM ';111 I l 4,1 1.1 1 .I . - . , iLated his agreement with Commiosioner Sceranka felt that these areas have been addressed. He Catmnission hears an issue that is somewhat con - leople from the community to the hearing, the and the issue because their concerns are mitigated. recent hearing involving a church, the Rcberts Etiwanda area addressed ir. the General Plan ated that as a result of the Etiwanda hearings, around the Victoria project. Further, that the been sensitive to the concerns of the residents progress affects them. He indicated that he ission would remember the EIR and know what the these and do their own mitigating on the issues. ted that the concerns of the community are being comes before the Planning Commission and that is conc,:zned and addresses the sociological _ated that when you speak of the rural character and traffic, school impaction and protection of aching on an area that a lot of people think hanging. He indicated that many don't think this the Planning Commission doesn't need to put s and he knows that he must say to them that these must be accepted and that this dues have an cummunity. Further, that it doesn't matter Commission is or what the justifications are, it :)mrtunity helps in providing as much information aking the correct decisions. t item can be added to the EIR. He indicated •n is talking about is outside the physical impact 11' 014' 101 .40401 14 did not think it appropriate to go into the I • 1 ' 1.1 . ill .• for is it required legally. 11.. .. ,N „ , • ''.1 1 d tb:Ie from a practical standpoint what they are x.10^ • 1 I.I.Li $ .11 t , r:'tsons come before the Commission is to create 111 11) ul IJ.1 !• / INII attempt to minimizes the culture shock. He ;,s is the whole purpose of what the process is about. ., 111 1 .1 •. 1 . ated that this does not address noise and he does ,+ 111 -ion. Further, that perhaps the EIR should he he minimum legal requirements are met. 4M11 , 1 1.1 14''11111 , ted that you cannot address every person in 1 . Ir1M,l.ln 1M .acated that there are general terms and this is .4694 vl .IIwI1l 4.1 1 lot trying to answer. ,.nt . IM 1111,1 ..1 ,., 4 )utes -9- February 5, 1981 There being no further comments, the public portion was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried unanimously, to adjourn to February 9, 1981.. . 9:50 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, JACK. LAM, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -10- February 5, 1981 E 11 L1 E DATE TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 22, 1981 Members of the Planning Commission Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner NO. 81- U.W.U. H17U /4JJ V1r1A1GJ — /ti a,cvc+v p+wc!•o- v. .. w.. -. buildings totaling 86,564 sq. ft. on 5.27 acres of land in the M -2 zone to be located on the northeast corner of Jersey Blvd. and Vincent Avenue - APN 209 - 141 -42 ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting review and approval and development of two industrial warehouse buildings as described above. The project has completed the development and design review process and is now before the Planning Commission for environmental review. Staff is recommending issuance of a Negative Declaration. BACKGROUND: This review is for environmental assessment to determine the significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. The site and architectural design is not considered at this time unless it is related to environmental concerns. To determine significant_ adverse impacts, an Initial Study on envirommental concerns is prepared. Upon com- pletion of that study, evidence would indicate either no significant impacts or the potential for significant impacts. If a determination of no signi.• ficant impacts is made based upon the Initial Study, then a Negative Declaration may be issued for the project. If significant impacts are found, then an Environmental Impact Report shall be required to fully analyze impacts of the project. The detailed Site Plan and elevations will be reviewed and approved with �nnditions by the City Planner, contingent upon approval of the Negative Declaration by the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part i of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and has found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon analysis of the Environmental Study, it appears that the project %ill not cause significant ;adverse impacts upon the environ- ment. If the Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Negative Declaration for the project would be in order. JL:DC:rd Attach. I : EM A "Ell I 1 NTM� I1� I - w Z72- Z• w t •1ti�.[MNM,4 BUILDING A :. EXISTING FACILITY. BUILDING B I 1 JCRSEV M.VD. CITY OF 46 RANCHO CC'C'ATMONGA PLANNIN G DIN'ISIO`1 NORTH ITEM: ' p TITLE: ���� EXHIBIT- SCALE: '° Z z� t= ywY. Ct }: Ir I� `V• 9 Y\qyI z BUILDING A EXISTING FACILITY BUILDING B r JERSEYULw. 17 i Lam,...•..... ,' •I � I'uK Ww..pw i��A�MYMwv � Il G NORTH 11 CITY OF ITEA1: �i1 6102' RANCHO CUC`Ai��IO \•GA TITLE: _ istars pAA _ � PLANNING DIVISION EXI'1IBM _4_ SCALE- L-111 G NORTH 0 EAST SOUTH WEST BUILDING A CITY OF RANCHO CUGkNT 10NGA PLANNING DIVISI N TITLE- _ EXHIBIT: -0 SCALE= NORTH El �t`A}O�� : `jl►:s flan. inaS IoCL°h dG°V�SN� /'! 1 NORTH CITY OF ITEM: �� 191&v 6r l AL #Asd RANCHO CUCANIONGA TITLE G PLANNING IDIVIS10N EXHIBIT: _ f— SCALE: 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental P.ssessment Review Fee: $60.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will rrepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and te1ke action no later than ten (10) day%.before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will :have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Cronin Industrial APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: don Lundstrom (same) LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) iin„(y(j 1pr_sey Rlvd Ctcamona,a CA 91740 _ AP 209 - 141 -42 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES A'&M THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Two ore as an addition to the exist n, L] It -up industrial buildings; all ronting on Jersey blvd. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF �Y.ISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGSr IF ANY: 5.27 acres on site - 2II 025 sq.ft. exist4ng w/ 24,030 sq.ft. addition plus 6 ,534 square eet In a sep- _ara p strurturp TataL 86-,5645q-ft- New _ DESCRIBE THE EWYT.RO`ITM1^7TAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORN,ATION ON TOPOGRAPIiY, PLANTS (TPXES) , ANIMALS, ANY Ct71LTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC .'ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AIM THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): fiat topography w /approx. 4 ft. of fall from the Northerly property Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series* of cumulative actions, which althc individually small, may as a whole have significant envi- orriental impact? 1Jo 13 El 11 WILL TI3IS PROJECT: YES hO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground !- contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration! X 3_ Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! X Q. create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations: _ X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposa*. of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, fla:nmables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPJRTaNT: If the project_ involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present-the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my *knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Signatures ���� Date _ Title YIC17 ZOV&S eNT T_3 1 0 L3 ra; DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM July 22, 1981 Members of the Planning Commission Jack �_am, Director of Community Development Michael Vairin, Senior Planner VARIANCE NO. 81 -02 - CHRISTIAN - Request to permit con- struction of residence that will encroach into front and rear yards on 3.532 sq. ft. lot in the R -3 zone, located at 6969 Amethyst - APN 202- 131 -04 BACKGROUND: This request was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of July 8, 1961, to determine the legality of the lot. To date, we have not been able to attain this information. We will try to have the information available by the meeting. Please find attached a copy of the original Staff Report. Respectfully ,sub tied, 1 Z JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:MV:cd Attachment ITEM 8 Ll E El C CITY oF' RANCHo Cu6woNGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 8, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Cmv.ission FROM: Barry R. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE NO. 81 -02 - CHRISTIAN - Request to construct res— icence that will encroach into front and rear yards on a 3,281 square foot lot in the R -3 zone located at 6969 Amethyst - APN 262- 131 -04 ABSTRACT: This item was continued from the June 24, 1981 agerila to all oow t'he applicant time to resolve problems with this request. Re- vised plans have been submitted and reviewed by Staff in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance Standards. Staff has provided a detailed analysis contained within this report and is recommending approval of the variance based upon the findings listed in the attached Reso- iutiop. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval for a variance on the ront and rear yard setbacks for a legal substandard size lot lor.ated at 6969 Amethyst Avenue, on the corner of Monte Vista Street (E.,hibit "A "). The applicant previously demolished and removed a delaoidated structure from this property with the intention of con- structing a new residence. The applicant has submitted construction drawings to the Building and Safety Division which indicate a proposed two story residence as shown on Exhibit "C ". The Zoning Ordinance requires a 25' front yard setback and a 20' rear yard setback for property in this zone. The applicant is requesting a 9' variance in the front yard setback and a 12' vari- ance in the rear yard setback. Therefore, should the Planning Com- mission approve the variance, the residence would be 16' from the public right -of -way on Monte Vista Street and 8' from the rear set- back line, as indicated on Exhibit "B ". The applicant's basis Fir requesting the variance is based upon the substandard lot size and configuration that is approximately 35' less than the minimum now required in the R -3 zone. ITEM C D El r" Variance No. 81 -02 July 8, 1981 Page Two ANALYSIS: Although the proposed variance, if approved as requester., wou result in the construction of a residence 8' From the rear prop- erty line, which is the side lot line for the property to the north, the existing residence to the north is approximat2l,y 15 to 20 feet from the subject property line. Therefore the result would be a separation between the two residences of 25 to 30 feet. Considerat'on should be given to the fact that the subject property is a 3,281 sgaare foot lot, whereas the R -3 zone has a minimum lot size of 8,000 sque6e feet. Additionally, although the Zoning Ordinance now requires a 2)' rear yard setback, the County Code required only a 10' rear yard set- back in the R -3 zone which is consistent with most of the dwelling units constructed in the immediate vicinity along Monte Vista Street. The front yard setback reduction to 16' would not be inconsistent with the setbacks found on other lots within the area under similar circumstances. Variances may E,! granted by the Planning Commission for certain devel- opment standar -s only when, because of special circumstances applicrble to the property such as size, shape, topography, location or surrourdings, the strict interpretation and application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive such property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and Lndcr identical zoning classification. Therefore, variances may be granted when the strict enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship inconsistent -with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance. After review of this request, Staff finds that the proposed variance is consistent with the intent Of the Zoning Ordinance and would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community or the surrounding area. CORRESPONLENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing and notices aF ve men mailed to property owners within 300' of the subject property. To date, no correspondence has been received for or against this project. 1 PIw g11.iM IN low UIN' _ 16 + % *d,i All ttl +iW 1 "n4 s 4114 1!' '' �11441i Idtl14�� "IM � i•IIIMr+ "•Ail . g1,lil�l +1 •u11IIN) i fw uuWd 1411.0111 commended that the Planning Commission conduct der all public input. If the Commission concurs 'f, hen the adoption of the attached Resolution .Ibi* "A" - Locat)cn Map 1 ••ai iwA.i,' f — xhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevation Resolution of Approval I Ll 11 7 l crrx or- RANCHO CUCATMONGA PLANNING DIVISION NURTH ITEM: JIB `P�, `' ,�k.+�li�o TITLE: r!o_m mAF E.XIiIBIT: --,,A— SCALE sow E L6 lz 7 < SO L Ape xo.*c;4 1A Xf 1 8 1c. L. MoM'-rG VISTA ST NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM: -\-J4& "600 glmooL - - TITLE- I?L&-r Flom EXHIBIT= SctkLE- aww I-] L Ll .1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIMONGA PLAINNING DIVISION c� NORTH ITEN-1: VrkF - �o , 21 dL TITUD I drAff M"= EXIMBIT--. 4 -SCALE mmlv RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 81 -02 TO DEVIATE FROM FRONT AND REAR YARD REQUIREMENTS LOCATED AT 6969 AMETHYST AVENUE IN THE R -3 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 21st day of May, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of July, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following ndings: A. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Zoning Code. B. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zoie. C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. D. That the granting of the Variance will not cotj!,titute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. E. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission Resolution No. Page 2 �. I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of July, 1981 by the following vote to- wi t: AYES NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: E 9 11117 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: APPROVAL. OF INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN ABSTRACT: This Planning Commission will hold a public hearing to con - s ear the Draft Environmental Impact Report and adoption of the Indus- trial Specific Plan. This report summarizes the revisions which have been made to the Industrial Specific Plan and recommends approval of the Industrial Specific Plan and certification of the Draft Environ- mental Impact..Report. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission has held two previous meetings to discuss and obtain public input on the Draft Industrial Specific Plan. At the previous meeting., the Planning Commission reviewed all the major sections of the Industrial Specific Plan which include: o Regional and Community Background o Area Development Concepts o Development Standards and Guidelines o Subarea Development Standards o Implementation Programs Although numerous minor word changes were necessary throughout portions of the Industrial Plan, a few more significant considerations for changes have been suggested for the Land Use Plan and Development Standards. These changes are summarized as follows: 1. Industrial Land Use categories were modified to redefine the Heavy Industrial area south of Arrow between Haven and Devore Freeway to "Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial ". This definition notes the charac- teristics of the existing industrial users and distinguishes the use characteristics from heaviest of industrial users allowed within Sub- area 15 east of Devore Freeway. o� ITEM C Planning Commission Approval of Industrial Specific Plan July 22, 1981 Page 2 2. Cnanges were made to Table III -1 on page III -6 to add a new land use category. Building Contractors Service Yard" provides storage yards for larae construction equipment and construction contracting firms. 3. Additional land use type definitions for Minimum Impact Heavy Manu- facturing was provided to describe the land use types within Subarea 9. 4. Throughout the Development Standards section, reference is made to Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (Subarea 9) where appropriate devel- opment standards are necessary. The parcel size in S, .jbarea 9 is a minimum of 2 acres extending from Arrow to 1000' south. with the re- maininq area having a minimum parcel size of 5 acres. The reason for this was to provide for similar parcel size to the land use adjacent on the north side of Arrow and maintaining a 5 acre minimum for other areas appropriate for the larger industrial user. 5. Minimum landscape coverage was modified to reflect the land use coverage on a subarea basis. In addition, calculations were made regarding the existing surrounding landscaped coverage of projects recently approved in development, especially those west of Haven. In some cases, land- scape standards were reduced while in other cases landscape coverage was increased. (Graphic material will be available at the meeting to answer any questions). An additional provision has been indicated to allow modifications of the landscape coverage when the Planning Com- mission determines that a project achieves a high quality design and is compatible with the land use category. 6. The 75' building height limitation was replaced with a requirement that any buildings over 75' in height *oust be approved through a Conditional Use Permit process. 7. Changes were made in the Subarea Standards to reflect those made as part of the overall development standards. El 8. The provisions for Master Plan requirements, as stated on page V -4, has been modified to clarify Oe intent. The purpose of the Master Plan requirement is to assure tilat any projects that would consist of multiple ownership or phased development should be compatible with the development standards of the Specific Plan through the preparation of a Master Plan prior to development. This Master Plan may be modified at any time future development might warrant the modifications. Any changes must be compatible with the overall project design and the Specific Plan standards. 0 Planning Commission Approval of Industrial Specific Plan July 22, 1981 Pace 3 Included with the Industrial Specific Plan is the Draft Environmental Impact Report. This report has been completed to satisfy CEnA require- ments for environmental processing of the Industrial Specific Plan. The report has been out for public distribution for the last forty -five (45) days during which time no written comments have been received. Should any be received prior to the public hearing, those will be brought before the Commission for comment and discussion. In order for the Planning Com- mission to recommend adoption of the Industrial Specific Plan, they shall also provide an opportunity to take public comment on the Draft Environ- mental Impact Report. The draft Environmental Report essentially outlines potential significant impacts for the development in the industrial area , and how the Industrial Specific Plan addresses mitigating those significant impacts. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider recommendation to the City Council that the Draft Environmental Impact Report is complete and adoption of the Draft Industrial Specific Plan with modifications by adoption of the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, t — G�1 JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:TJB:Jr Attachments: Draft Environmental Impact Report Draft Industrial Specific Plan Resolution ►.J RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL A CERTIFICATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE SPECIFIC PLAN OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA AND APPROVAL OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN OF THE Ii9DUSTRIAL AREA AS PREPARED BY THE CITY AND MODIFIED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65450 allows Cities to adopt a Specific Plan, and WHEREAS, Rancho Cucamonga has prepared a Draft Specific Plan for the Industrial area as shown on Exhibit "A ", and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has studied said document and had conducted public hearings receiving public input from the coirdn'ity regarding hoth the Draft Plan and the Draft Environmental Impact Report, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission upon conducting its public hearings has recommended modifications to the Draft Industrial Specific Plan. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga recommends to the City Council: 1. Certification of the Draft Environmental Impact Report. 2. Approval of the Draft Industrial Specific Plan as amended by the Planning Commission. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Panning Commission 1 J 11 Resolution No. Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the-City of Rwicho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City c: Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22rd day of July, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: lit N, ,a M um 0 LLJ a, C M U) ZIX ul 1 -G - I 11 Cl 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Rv- Dar. Coleman. Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRGNMENTAL ASSESSNT ME AND TENTAT :VE TRACT NO. 9658 MCCUTCHAN - A tota'1 resi cntial dove opment of 26 lots consisting of 52 single family residential dwelling units arranged as duplexes on 6.92 acres of land in the R -'L zone located on the north side of 9th Street between Baker and Madrone Avenues - APN 207 - 261 -03 ABSTRACT: The applicant is requesting approval of 52 units arranged as duplexes to be located on the north side of 9th Street between Baker and Madrone Avenues. This project has been designed as a duplex development in accordance with the R -2 section of the Zoning Ordinance. The project is in conformance with the City's General Plan and has passed the City's Growth Management and Design Review Process. Consequently, approval of the tentative map and Negative Declaration is recommended. BACKGROUND: The applicant is 'requesting review end approval of a 6.92 acre residential subdivision on the north side of 9th Street between Baker and Madrone Avenues (Exhibit "A "). The site is presently zoned R -2 and is designated onthe General Plan as medium density residential (4 -14 du's /ac). The site is presently vacant and consists of weeds and grasses with no existing structures. The existing grade slopes at approximately 2% in a southeasterly direction. The property is surrounded on the north by a church and orchard, on the east by commercial and residential, on the south by single family residences, and on the west by Los Amigos Jr. High School. The proposal has been reviewed as a total development package by the Growth Management and Design Review Committees in accordance withthe Growth Manage- ment Ordinance, and met the minimum point rating threshold required. The conceptual grading plan has also been reviewed by the Grading Committee and received approval in concept only. ANALYSIS: The tract map, as shown on Exhibit "B" has been prepared in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act, and the City's Subdivision Ordinance. All structures have been designed in accordance with the R -2 zone sF,tback requirements. Access to the tract has been provided by 2 east - west cul -de -sac streets from Madrone Avenue. To meet fire access require- ments, the applicant will be required to provide fire lane access from Baker Avenue to the cul -de -sac on "B" Street. The proposed site plan, as shown on Exhibit "C ", involves the realignment of Madrone Avenue at 9th Street to eliminate the curve. This will necessitate the abandonment and ITEM 0 TT 9658 Staff Report -2- acquisition of prblic right -of -way. Juiy 22., 1981 The site plan, as indicated on Exhibit "C ", proposes duplex units arranged such that only one garage from each pair of �lnits faces the stn <ets, The Conceptual Landscape Plan, Exhibit "D ", indicates the use of 5 foot grape - stake fences between units, to enclose back yards. As can be seen from the tract map, the southerly cul -de -sac encroaches into the church property. The Engineering Division is recommending that the cul- de -sac be revised so that it does not affect the church. Attached as Exhibit "J" is Engineering's proposed alignment. In addition, Enbineering is recom- mending that additional driveways be combined as shown on Exhibit "J ". The Design Review Committee has reviewed the submitted site pl: -. floor plans, elevations and materials, and landscape plans and have recommended approval of this project. The Committee requests that front yard land- scaping be installed by the developer in addition to the planting as indicated on the Conceptual Landscape Plan. The conditions of approval as recommended by the Design Review Committee have been incorporated into the attached Resolution for your consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and has conducted ;: field investigation. Upon com- pletion of the Initial Study, no significant adverse impacts were found as a result of this project. The issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate if the Commission concurs. CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was advertised in the Daily Report newspaper. In addition, approximately 30 public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date no oral or written communication has been received regarding this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing tc consider public input on this project. If, after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions recommended by Staff then the adoption of the attached Resolution, with Conditions, would be appropriate. R spectf(uilI submitted, K LA1WlI, Director o Cor,4nunity Development JL:DC :cd Attach. Ell E P E 0 E CITY OF RANCHO CU AAlMONGA PLANNING DIVISION �>-�) NOb TH kfs TITLE: _ 4CAM04 MAP EXHIBIT= SCALE- 0ownp n •) x•ooc 'o] 1 / L r �I l I r / y y�c a • �'wrrr.r� V NORTH E CITY OF ITEN't RANCHO CUCAN'IONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIN'ISION EXHIBIT: _ SCALE= E 0 E, CITY 01,47 RANCHO CUCAlV ONGA PiANNING UIViSION TITU- _ otom VAhd EXHIBIT: ____ia___ SCALE: 000"' C5� NORTH i 0 NORTH E CITY O ITG,�: 'fit' q�oowl RA\•CHO CUCANIONGA TITLE: d�deffUAL aoAol PLANNING 1D1'%'ISIQN E}CHII3iT __0 SCALE:_ E 11 i4rontElevation Al , CITY Or RANCHO CL,TCATMO \'GA PLANNING UNISON TITLE: teg yArmQ "J EXHIBIT= 29 SCXLE: _Avm" NORTH L L'N MMO aAI I ill �•i � � \ .. � 19} �.Y 1•n 44.� I��..1N1i•Y •y� 1�`� ",'.�. _, W "�.+..ww.. <vj s /'.�yi.�.�tT �+.�'w4rM ar �. —iVy •� rY nom• Right Side A 1 i4rontElevation Al , CITY Or RANCHO CL,TCATMO \'GA PLANNING UNISON TITLE: teg yArmQ "J EXHIBIT= 29 SCXLE: _Avm" NORTH Ll 1 All _u.- I �,.,,ai�s'�- _'- ..'G'T.' i� r •���i 1.'— �ir= }- r:s —.�.� n— �— �_ —.r.�. ... Riglit Side C Front Elevatioxa C 1 V � I\K)RTH CITY OF ITFIN1: or %* Ts RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE 94-- arl�� PLA"NNING DIVISION EXHIuT:_19 _SOXLE- gw ° f CITY or RANCHO CUCANIONGA PLANNING DIVISION I� El NORTH EXI MIT: -P- SCALD u CITY O RANCHO O CUCATMONGA PLANNING DIVISION V V NORTH ITEM: _`tea ®�� ��✓ ��p�y TITLE:���rvl�le AM �m►ft r3m EXHIBIT 2 SCALE -_ - C w CITY 0147 RANCHO PLANNING DIVISION C V FORTH ITEM= lrqc.6va _ TITLE= r 5Ej�C� /�pg EXIA13M. SG1LE- _. �71" Ll El CITY" OF RANCAO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 • o..r nil - rtr- n_io_r_ --a_ rcr711i.rincr environmental review. this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1.) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tract No. 9658 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: McCutchan Engineering, Inc., 265 N. San Gab-iel Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91107 (213) 795 -53.62 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Garry Vander Mende 265 N San :abriel Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91107 (213) 795 -5162 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Baker Street and 9th Street _ 207- 261 -03 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM IfOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None - "I-r PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: in which each unit is indiv, subdivision. This is a du owned i.iaing project a zero -lot line ACREAGE OF PROJECT A &EA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Parcel contains 6,92 acres. No buildings exist. Proposed homes to contain square feet. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON?lENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACK NECESSARIf SHEETS): The project site is relatively level, sloping from northwest to south- The surrounding properties consist of a Junior High School church. orchards and single family residences There are no existing structures within the proiect site. Is the prc:ject, part of a larger proje -!t, one of .. series - of cumulative actions, which although _ndividually small, may as a whole have significant enviroi:nental impact? No E. 11 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial c.zange in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? A 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal. services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan Jesignations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? TI /A X C. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IVA IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the'statements furnisb'�d above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the bast of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true- and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand t1n t additional informatics may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Developr..ent Review Comm.itt�e_ Date_ �2'/// f�� Signature G ✓��� Title \ x?� RESIDENTIP.L CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: M. J. Brock & Sons,•Inc. Tract 9658 Specific Location of Project: Baker Street and Ninth Street PHASE I PRASE 2 PHASE 3 PIiASE 4 TOTAL 1. Num'oe= of single family units: 54 54 2. Number of multiple family units: N/A N/A 3. Date proposed to begin. construction- July, 1981 ' 4. Earliest date of March, 1982 1,ode1 - and of Te.ntlat =ve 5. Price Rance "A" bedrooms bedrooms "C" bedrooms RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 9658. WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 9658, hereinafter "Map" by m�r_i,+rhan FnainpPrino_ aoolicalit. for the purpose of subdividirgJthe real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San bernardino, State of California, described as a total residential development of 52 units designed as duplexes into 26 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on July 22, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject- to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECT ?ON 1: Tne Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 9658 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivi :Aon is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by ti►e public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. fe SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 9658, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereb, approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. All lots shall be graded to drain to the street in accordance uoi+h Ilnifn"n Ruiieiinn rMa rPn:airP.mP.nts. 2. Provisior shall be made for the acceptance and conveyance of drainage water frnm adjacent church property to street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ENGINEERING DIVISION 3. Dedication shall be required by spearate instrument of the missing right -of -way of Madrone Avenue to provide a total of 60 feet wide right -of -way at and near the inter- section with 9th Street prior to recordation of the map. C. A minimum of 13 feet wide asphalt concrete pavement with berm at the edge shall be constructed on the east half of Madrone Avenue to match the existing pavouent. 5. "A" street shall be redesigned to form a knuckle at the end. 36 feet wide street section shall be provided. 6. "D" street shall be realigned to eliminate the odd Lha.ped lot and shall be provided with the temporary cul -de -sac standard at the end. 7. Number of driveway openings on 9th Street shall be reduced by providing joint driveway access between two consecutive units. Reciprocal access and drainage easements between the units shall be provided and shall be delineated on the map. 8. Exist roadside drainage ditch on north of 9ti Street shall be regraded and lined with riprap from Madrone Street to the first driveway to the east. 9. Existing pavement on 9th Street at the intersection with the existing and the proposed Madrone Avenue shall be reconstructed to standard cross section to the satis- faction of the City Engineer. ra E E Resolution No. ?age 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAV OF JULY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO Ct- CAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST • — Secretary of the P anning CommlS51011 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Corraission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. do hereby-certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introd+acedp passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July..3981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS �o- • O.r Dr 6iD l W J4. 1 9 .. 6 b n •c ° 'Ii ,10 w q rA lrbi 2J�6�DYr W aw t� C t w.D 1 W g oo. pPWn >1°D b r 7 r 1# µ m J b T;6' S l ru Pva�J Fu '4iD 10 TN O 9 N N H� n 17L J n r �d � J MO1Gir °•, O q J A m b+ J b O a u7 J J 10 T ,oJ J)0N N O J+ O +'• N > n Jo WL � J 6 A]YN C.r'i A O SuJ 6 NSA rAW H Orr 1yc a u N M 1 u O A b 6 J l � rb R a1 µ.J r J C O +1 y � � 6N +N N n ^ ^OJ N N 3 nO w O � b + J B O 6 � A J N +N .w A w O N Y P1D w S l e! N A O•C D n 1.[ N �N l J - J W J J N O 7 0 q 6fYr N O O. �A1�n 1M N f� I N n +JS^ 6 p •� v v $b' w Q � A 'A S' < a J .Ii n P. Yn,v P O O r< A O 1 O O V i } A G P •( L � d 6 N i n. o _ dJ .A on J O � 6 n A N N a W 18S m bwwr c + n n w 0.rJ Sd. WJ, b eo ^emu J Ab AIiM �a m b n W A c Y1 Qn' I•lu 4 A W a w W a n�d1ti J t r w ^ = C N r 6S A AAO9J O + O A + i 7 ^0.W Q DY 9 W w A w O J O 6 S BO � WH• 1pu n J.N.c A Nsn 1 w N i W a � � O d �� �ar� n = l n n A J J R< 1li160 �•C A � n W 0 A O w J rw 6rO1O l �•< wS OJw:� A b• � C J O. - 0- O 9 � N 7 O O N A C J O r J O W N •l .A O • 11 _ w nn T �` •< A J10 h N W i N d ' :• p N A ow o J�c n O.O A A S O 6 b 2:=9 A Aa O` • y ry� 'Oy h rD w Y O � v c o m K+ Pl V N 01 i Big .Yi 9 N D .a r nn c n W w 1¢ no +� A n•.g� z^ nb �Tw n wA 6 N oa �. •O y C �O = 31 �� � O T N O�!1j r I!A Md •- _ N C W p 1y n'h �.J.. m Ig M- ir p +�.. ' •C 2 C l ry N b. N n ry < n r 3 O N N °w an n r W o •^[ C bN w A 4 NtYi br O n M A b r 6 A W i 11 n O r4 G � C w J W A M A i w 6 Y r'� ryy C '\ El }N pYq T T ti U O 0 t O `. El i i i i •f N Ob I I I I k xv Y o /- 1` N `^ W N w. b m V T V1 Y W N O tir9 A AST D M <1 I•TD O �y, V nwti �r rvw JOQ Abu lr AIDr JJ-Dr OP C qT QVZ 7� S ° , OCA iJO yrrL 6 ^ 1 {q J eN16vr wal � � A b > 9 •' 'A 61D O+rO w A J } W MM a' r a..wn, q •.d�b� 6 J 99w?ra•J W � ? fO -1 . A 1 N N 9On 7J °OJ ,r NNa N A� 1Ni10 rN2 �ry?N Pw 0.r °N D' Nr cpa �Cp r r y07 Jrlu,R 4�. e<1�f V: N P� �bID Y6 NN < O Nw J y br'YJJ n O AqJ G L� O� pppy rQ1 wV W+ w_ n N w P J� 1x 1Ji1 S wY w p O"�U 4K^ i_i_ mN� Iun AJ. WJ 6 nnOa Ww A wAG rJ4 _ r N V N6r n -• (.a Q 1 O„ A'J �_ �Cr nLA ~ r y Wr� 6 4W p w A T d ti b III Y 4 W^ P � o •f r ,0 J` O b � � � 9 � N �1,u S r ,pL 'D °a66c .•'n 1a Wn J<J oo i.°. N'� nD °• i .�.°. b eb wN _r wJ? vo n � #r��6 "'ri •u `11 �^+ 0.J+ O, 'J OW•C 1•CW O'o9 WN N J W y Wn Y• 6 J n J j u. 0 J N+ C O P r d W w.O A y O J O Y 1b.' G w p b -' O'r A 1p N +TN_ �n 6p J W i•1+i �° � y ,•. �� • N �� r N N rb110 Y � n S J r � b< w� 1< j~ 7 S r1[ n1 wJ J Ar •°WO' 1N C �p. JnA N1P wr ON uZ r1• < A C1 O J N e u < 3 p n 4 W J r, N� 4 oI"• L 6 O �0 > C N w J 7 N 1B d n � T A A m �o- • O.r Dr 6iD l W J4. 1 9 .. 6 b n •c ° 'Ii ,10 w q rA lrbi 2J�6�DYr W aw t� C t w.D 1 W g oo. pPWn >1°D b r 7 r 1# µ m J b T;6' S l ru Pva�J Fu '4iD 10 TN O 9 N N H� n 17L J n r �d � J MO1Gir °•, O q J A m b+ J b O a u7 J J 10 T ,oJ J)0N N O J+ O +'• N > n Jo WL � J 6 A]YN C.r'i A O SuJ 6 NSA rAW H Orr 1yc a u N M 1 u O A b 6 J l � rb R a1 µ.J r J C O +1 y � � 6N +N N n ^ ^OJ N N 3 nO w O � b + J B O 6 � A J N +N .w A w O N Y P1D w S l e! N A O•C D n 1.[ N �N l J - J W J J N O 7 0 q 6fYr N O O. �A1�n 1M N f� I N n +JS^ 6 p •� v v $b' w Q � A 'A S' < a J .Ii n P. Yn,v P O O r< A O 1 O O V i } A G P •( L � d 6 N i n. o _ dJ .A on J O � 6 n A N N a W 18S m bwwr c + n n w 0.rJ Sd. WJ, b eo ^emu J Ab AIiM �a m b n W A c Y1 Qn' I•lu 4 A W a w W a n�d1ti J t r w ^ = C N r 6S A AAO9J O + O A + i 7 ^0.W Q DY 9 W w A w O J O 6 S BO � WH• 1pu n J.N.c A Nsn 1 w N i W a � � O d �� �ar� n = l n n A J J R< 1li160 �•C A � n W 0 A O w J rw 6rO1O l �•< wS OJw:� A b• � C J O. - 0- O 9 � N 7 O O N A C J O r J O W N •l .A O • 11 _ w nn T �` •< A J10 h N W i N d ' :• p N A ow o J�c n O.O A A S O 6 b 2:=9 A Aa O` • y ry� 'Oy h rD w Y O � v c o m K+ Pl V N 01 i Big .Yi 9 N D .a r nn c n W w 1¢ no +� A n•.g� z^ nb �Tw n wA 6 N oa �. •O y C �O = 31 �� � O T N O�!1j r I!A Md •- _ N C W p 1y n'h �.J.. m Ig M- ir p +�.. ' •C 2 C l ry N b. N n ry < n r 3 O N N °w an n r W o •^[ C bN w A 4 NtYi br O n M A b r 6 A W i 11 n O r4 G � C w J W A M A i w 6 Y r'� ryy C '\ El }N pYq T T ti U O 0 t O `. El L, m V OI N 1. Sy N r I CD OI VI P W J U -1p B„ O'A' K ON J�O •ItSti ON> p y i +pIT y HN I.Tw li ID r r 3 OAI O'm 6Vtl N r6p qNl �^ OW TOS �r�w� to W ?t r OrJ > TB r n w AY n� .LT > n .. >d ro Nr.r N� w _'. f' .p C $ Alp ^ 1/ r? N 'J tir Jl0 p'1 N> N`tl J r .� qq W 1 v A •. ^Jl i Is Jn >m >1O p � O^ r1N N LO^ d w ; 1 NNW T 6 y+ N ��Ip J> q O F Nq � i NfJ GNU YW �6LJ.i �.lr 9 > qT �Y�Z n^ •_y6 a0.41p ` q N rX, IDK �. OV N > CNOO Ian 690 aw M >Qln 1q 50 JJ Ip N K K Y ^ m H O C+ 6 �lq0,'p T n w q'ww J A •V4 � O -'I/t GUn > l � ' N aM �6 oo to nmA V9 N SQ r1oG S >w 9ayw �'� lon o�Y r>, r r M1 �q N 1'� i°m >�� VtU r>• nry9W OY Vlan eD� 9 4FWN S�J p� �. 02 ry 10N A A N P OO •" <O,r S r 'I' N n O. N -I > ? Y G O C n m .T.Ip T �A Y C K~ N , w r 6 902 0 0 p O nN NOrINrI LTi w A Oj >1p 9� 0 YNO J4 G •1 ]Yi >IL )1 �6 + r : r ID >wS u>i i Ow0'K A J N' • N N m C 4 N 9 m OI > V l F q> wl •4 n 9 r -J q q Y 10 pag n. J J n > F r n o m o O N T' o+ ~i N x F q 1J 10 tT n ro )� N �A'O Vm A aio e• i� OIV. V.m INnA Y =O"- n q a O r N � O• q O •� � ,4>r i Y 6 ^ l r A l Y N� �I +_". > >•1 �JIIC+�p p' N n J� T� 6 4 W 9> q ~ M y a i. n N m ^14 nm 6ilJ J K6N 6 S q Or ^ALL O'� n� w 6 Cn1 q Nn �Cw N> J �6 Ip fj =y, O> 9C rvO » yd n •F �• 4 � Y O •�J d� Y q 16 t w DnJ >UOY� new it O NN O V, > NA J 6FNr m0 > C tlw Y !1 nn CLl 10 •�IJ IT W Cu C„>I �_N JN> F» �pr JY J qu>i r ? n9 0 IJbn YT y'. 1p r �L nv � �OtO�OD +M D•1p �O> qqM O6JOi • r NJ 4L')� O Oq FN S O' 6 r j NJ q0 J JSn 9q l_6 AV r F6 q�9N nf1 w•y 9FID �•II /.p N N tL m F J +. ry Fw H li _9 �A FO 1 � +6>rF �. V Y• C10 6l9 ^l J Ll C Y •JC Nr. n 6 9Tp C wry l 9 �O p JYr Y P V O L _ l ^ C C' d CCC111 n >.. t^ nLro flwJ w L" it y � J l n qr Jlp _ �I tl AJ o � T • >C JDb, OLCIA A OI VAIr ^ N B. 'J N.I•�9 •A.O >� 1 T y Cr In J Nye A IJ A ISO TNJ OILS n O � O N y r 10 m0 3n..t q99 N. QN FOn TO n 0. -JA n •w n >' O U Y n S n . �, � J L O M1 r. F 1f O 'I ID b q mw o >m Npap «ri p w B. nY " >� NN9 n— q q�l o�j m N o WA i• a', n� a, 9 n �... OJ Nnl n�9ur;C6q 6 O r�l +•+ V-1 nKb ION TN Ib �� 6 C W Or Qan'WJ IO F D' P,KP 1�d CID �D 9a rr.•iD' Fn0 OIO T Oq � IJI,N Y. � rOOq J'n^ S 9O ^ n O O� x m 9 J 'J •w r. 10 S� � � b q 9 ij' . q 4 A � l � 000wn �^ oJrvrsrm Ipll •�+ r on> >nmc � N>T r 6ON iuN I wJ Nn Y9 m JT d �: J'n w�9 p r Jy • 7�q •SH !i. � O F 9 •• r C O� n y,b O• r J u O m O W N O n_ l Sm V P C O N O I C J 9 q A Q 'O -J rp y O 9 11 J r 'S OnIO ,Cn wdO to O ✓ 99 O <LI O IO O_w ^ 8 LI ,' rn,Ow N� nqr O' 6 nK •^ + �C G < NN l �l A Cg � S 99 ti ETr O 7 W YII M1 !N O 4� N A (Y N ✓_ W C 'V � I. 09 C`l W S.>i= '.IV '�J p A N r V-I m =}' O•Ln K r.w CN J .1� IO• + %^ -? C 6 Imn.�T w O '� 1D n N V S A g< •J � __ C K> N A v J ID H T r ID NK;PJ In D�.N 10`Cp- � '. M_ J OIO •rp 0 d C n? N +J r � � y YO » O 10 � r � FN J ,6r OOJ r0 rG { N ^ , �89 1,. 11 O A ryJ O IN = 9 r.ROA v S O W O nJ ry~ 6 N ION1I N = r. NO n ri �pI 6w N -} r J .q•. �j N 9 J y� C-• OS =. m q j. �p .nI r �O 10 AB �m J Y nJ`, l O = p 1" Jn�}'Q O SF n 9 L qJm r. C 96 rll0 �Nn Nay uqi YI�OiI �•)wm N 4OOOO�iYS. 0L gO ^ Qn J _O IOOW I IT b . ,A' Ky JN ^>4 NJ 8r all i IIIL 9VL N=4 �G�}S a q T V C ? �•J SS�wl4w d W J Y + O' N O O O D NN U ^ f. I N l.•.0 A P n L. am 1 •' M1 ' ` V M n W c N ' w '�' Y �J I I '•. C Aq YA •ryIKN .Oq NrlpD w"'.�Ni -O ryK>I' r' •w6 J R rjv0 p9 nJ.p / r4 6DTINJ O WO � dIA I r• N N6 NA N J Am (yA r S �� 6Or Y...�L A -vA »r: iN1p^ ID no c -a Y t� �•3 on n m I'w m N • q � OC7 w i � ~ ro —bT nw � b�. ^nC Z of rrr S > d y q C q S Y d O q C C v • Vv N y q 10 9 C n N A� q p M �+N V nq nnw O_ Al MN ^ �C � <r 6p pL'r Nr�i n:D fql ID ' >9Anon r il^!N G A �• � N Y l M O0 ^. Yw � O � b S Y ` Ow YI•� ww e6 ^6 = � 1 w i I a•a O♦ O O �♦ n N r N iS b J ♦O l N.1 K N L N VCr ^ r 9 q 6 6 oa u_ d l O r E ma + } ^14 F 'n 6 P♦N ^ O P> 6= N n N P i of CN n a O N r n 4 6 i J Ol T ♦O A rJ u o >4 rC ♦O ? r n 4 AP. O 6 O 6V N l • F .8. V r.4 mN 6 I N o n m <n In go° V , O < , w n N � W l =WR N � » t 6 n J. aNr 60 N C � C i r p ^u u w u 7 Y 9 nd dNn V �N P O N O r n d 4 n J N 1= I= n y i�j O N � C n 6 i u "] N r N W w n d w � TAT m r5 „ ?O n O n n m J N ♦O T O Y N ♦` o w l J O O O c m 6'< M N J N � W r Y O l •O N w o♦ S C Y N J N n Wp N n n 4 4 a A 9 'o a 4 N , d P c N u v aG 6 W N NQ � � � P'♦P20.0 ♦O r F i m N N<�+ fan Qr w xr��� N f n O_ u H V ^ 6 N » S •J S Y F N O O O Obi p♦N N plr -•v � Nw4n N O N N r F ^ qL N �Y dN r ♦n IL =O g T �-' •'N ° ��ow , n n w lu 6 F 6 j.V 4 n N S J rr•. N O v♦ O N 6 W= li Y Nw w ♦O 1Y n.+� f r tl ? f\ O r♦ n V Vb N au � rr ♦O 6p r0 O N p Y N»wJ �r •� J rn O J r � w J O AAry N .d. Ndw p p 4 �6p O O O b� S W W N n N ^ N n O O O oJ- n N O .N. ♦$ o ° J Y 6 16 w N r f + u.o b o J uN W -•7 b � r y N N 1T n m N t n O W N T P S N � N N O ♦wi. b L v �Tb u o w� o N'm � Y d � O O w J l c n » N ^ Oh _ S O N oS O r^^ Y y y N f� r if n Z h m D C O O .l! n yw 2 i O �P4C4 MNNT N r O n i g V r O onPN v.�'�l IYG w3N0 a �O N♦-r (rY. Or+W S O N J A n J VC•/ ^bC •nO QN T FNN � O♦ d nOP r W cN� oe�r J» N b J 4 4Td. Tr. r�•?�;• wry S J 6 r.♦��p11 r �. RNn.. ID PdN -• N 1J0` =tl m1a ra =tl »io rJ • G F " N 7r� O _6rV • -IJN l Y uGi N w N D P SN p{bN�NL �mm!� 8 J♦CV N Two N T--N •r O♦ry C J v t ♦O N N J l p T IIN r,fR < r Od O.1 O Y N N O P o J < l N Q N W f♦ V y uS• _ m J w N W W w i r y NN�n n r � 6 ? J 4 OT » 6 y S J N W =5a n N N b J O d N O m —m b O » J »•r0 a nma » N O] i •`r O n + N 4f) C � p w N N 6 Qp i O S L •� N a ti n ti T m O 3 O } 2S rn O s I� x e\ N N v r o w w r 4 r � T .L.. w-n N?N 9♦6�L 0.0 6r.Ji�O Y »<y Jw Cd TnT =(u tpy J 'O ♦ppn••N rirj n 0u10..6 �. 1'♦J Ni m N� ^n `'L J O •^i N i »vo' rr +r n!4 m a W -1 � mat .•Nj w 9Y' , avruOJRm ..moo l ry 4 w (Y p4 =09 >cfi N.V �N irN J�rin l ♦° n tl'..Pi l v °Ta�io♦o`nc �^ a �iry wiL J r^. rNi +N �v o >> ^bNnN ^N oarew Yn,r W R at S d �• O 9 n ♦ N q G N ro O^ N v�44 w dnN °v wWO< x=.Uv l N �oJ. � '•'o.N u o - A N N oral .�.y ry�ro v•N..•4J NJOG' aomFw �J r C V o r.N n r O l ♦O ;; � O d ♦C u O ry 3 bV 6 6rw.o. TS'♦+T O d N N S V u N .1 all p;3 — n N J N• 9 r C F w_ON, �� n06r 4 � ^9m ldn» °♦ '� 3 n r ?� b aN•. N'J�cp6 5" n N O+ w Nv O J E. YN rJ N N N v r o w w r 4 r � T .L.. w-n N?N 9♦6�L 0.0 6r.Ji�O Y »<y Jw Cd TnT =(u tpy J 'O ♦ppn••N rirj n 0u10..6 �. 1'♦J Ni m N� ^n `'L J O •^i N i »vo' rr +r n!4 m a W -1 � mat .•Nj w 9Y' , avruOJRm ..moo l ry 4 w (Y p4 =09 >cfi N.V �N irN J�rin l ♦° n tl'..Pi l v °Ta�io♦o`nc �^ a �iry wiL J r^. rNi +N �v o >> ^bNnN ^N oarew Yn,r W R at S d �• O 9 n ♦ N N 4 O P d 4 ja NTr FTOi CI Y♦ CLOT W w RpN 610 qN 00♦NS d � pO� p ON J O a Od 'j t��N r S4J Wl. r.�N �ony n�v OT; O <O+ QC' r Q•' 8 r n ♦O J-, r �. Op0 N d� N N ^i y` TN Cb utO �Jd IN Gr �06N r. p _ �°+ F� f1N db 6 Ow i NM n1J .eN � . li n u g< i N dmn-d Y. m —� �+ � T.g J aQG ."�.♦.° d p j 0 a S ;' 6 ' 4 N 0 � C »n OLN w 6 t dVN T F d py- R NOS di. r. J Nr.r N FO yN <2l tlJ ON� O µs drO.G N O N F N N aC 4 N 6 w f l r N d N O N O w n N r �1D ,'OJ d JOS N ON O d � p O_�a = S? LN O� Z7,7 q» Jry d ♦O d T N x n~ T F a N N N O N n O n N V »N^ .y.. p N J +T� O 1uVW dd O r^.00 J'TS N tl• p S TN � O V �, JN, O w N T S V F D W a + l •J p G C O d = N ♦r N L n r° N n b� N r <W L I ♦^n W C J rVP C 6 Ny =WNW. ray j.Nn OJ r♦ r j n, S♦•C Nd0• o Hg J .Ni fN♦ .d.N a]. 9• �D Y°♦� A TN n.l. S N �JP A 10NF OP nV �Yw 1�NT NUn♦np r 6 N°O JaG t:'G rON N S9L 4nA $ m N J W mN0 W wm� ♦O Tw n. rpr N MY I F r dmSSN S C O r.0 Jw 6 NnN D F,t DOd w O w �_ W � r. ♦pd 1p J N «ai O S l •y O O d w•. J f' N 9 N S W N Y b N N B i O 6 •.♦ N q d T 6 C N ^♦O NNN r.OG N_ya 4 .r nJYO An6 n0. S♦OS d n W' D' J » O J O IN ♦O » N J N y. w N N w < 6 N N d . S w N W N �. ♦n l l r♦ 61O �• , 6 Y .O , O u d en o r T R Z. w N� •• 9�w � V nF J r J F0.O �Nd O ♦n »� DOS i yC'N= C6 610 Y. .•.w r S• wL♦0 60 ,tp'Nl iwl N1 FO S N�1C ♦ON IY 2- p O S y, d dNar4V6 S N n O d F O rl�• N J• w ^N0 N Q p N =O •• r �NJC JPNO q• 0 T r� N fl N 6•c� �O+rN �TJ llf � � V N 9 Or J r IJ 50 W A T� 6f� M •b q a9 �G 9 m N n r �, O'O ttl K '3 ry /, 1 N Y • i �n b 4,N J NJ �i ry nS •warn 10 n i N n y R �D N 6 A 10 C S X rO 6 9 4 JtT H �N O L O � Ow NON-. ry aye n f' yT rJ n O ;d V�C. t1Cn� N1 �Y q 6J O O �.- l �1 +4 0 6> m .rp Np ar. qp 10 p N nJ' ry �.` N � 1qi• N /11 L ;6 N6 6 NY N j1KN �v qm nN oY 'S � Ko Nr• aN 4 N, T �C i e Jp N9J n p m ^ n n i n r M 1�i. .>•1 +no kTn mN1$m' �Yrn ,� oo e. rbTr� ShWn• �W A� N1�.0 6�!1Kw +,tlZ l q S w n K W O ,J �•rp 10K J 1 J N � � �NOYN ,N N rdi Np anJ �b0 `l N, a6 Y-• BNnO •1�N n� mw °.. bI''J Jw m9nN OJnW r >H10 M °J NTJ 'O1DO ••f llp '�' �d �j p$ Nr o b Iw +• J v -n rya a 2nn v�n � �r ha 'hn 09 %d �- d o Jom1n n��i� a• .r ZZ w p D P n u n r S i +NC =�• Jlb n yNnn Ned BOO > p(6p(�ugi R N w �N ••� n K ,6�0 J C �Y O DO do J iu� NO i o- v p•nj�jn J N C i• U N N N a � •, N n ;5 gag , ^ On Oan n N AD�� Odr'm[ ON> O �'q w. v N y 1 1" N n Iti 6 n w J n C N J N O N J 1a C_ •w n K O,N +u bw �bWry N ml.l Rrn ~aN l'D nn16T W N NVJ' .Sn Ip boa N N ma .mow % ON t lx 1N 9..n r�1 n6 O _ 10 -� prpN �vawv b iq� crawly ar.�`e rap =J S � w�N wiION +O �N 1 Cp N m a r IJ 50 W A T� 6f� M •b q a9 �G 9 m N n r �, O'O ttl K '3 ry /, 1 N Y • i �n b 4,N J NJ �i ry nS •warn 10 n i N n y R �D N 6 A 10 C S X rO 6 9 4 JtT H �N O L O � Ow NON-. ry aye n f' yT rJ n O ;d V�C. t1Cn� N1 �Y q 6J O O �.- l �1 +4 0 6> m .rp Np ar. qp 10 p N nJ' ry �.` N � 1qi• N /11 L ;6 N6 6 NY N j1KN �v qm nN oY 'S � Ko Nr• aN 4 N, T �C i e Jp N9J n m l R C a N N O ryi 6 n S O n w O N n d m a� d IJi' y b� N n n M1 N �A ro_ a 1 m G„ O r N O r � 4 3 JN y. � O i w , O T rN. n Vim 1v p m ^ n n i n r M 1�i. .>•1 +no kTn mN1$m' �Yrn ,� oo e. rbTr� NNnv To n O ,J r 10K N p, N 0 9 ,N rdi Np anJ �b0 `l N, a6 Y-• r UO pry, Kr Y+ 20 �j p$ b Iw +• 2nn v�n c �irv� 'hn -= a d o C ZZ w p D P n u n r S i Y O a Lpa 6 N p(6p(�ugi R N w ••� n �JY N Y. l > iu� NO i o- v p•nj�jn J N C i• U N N N a � •, N n 6 i n , ^ n �•a R O w. v N y 1 1" N 6 n w W N YJj .Sn 00 YO N N r�1 n6 O a� 10 -� prpN �N 1 Cp N a �6 S urn 3V •• 1O Y � NwN 6 ^ N KO W N OV p 6w n ppn ninO K Nn .[ ; N 65 N 'JT� Nq 0. 6O. W 4J T.O 11 N+ p n OW IV I Oy n MJ do N a �� 6 n < 37 � T 6N6 .9 A I n N� yr �n O n o m 6_ hl O 4n O J y •�f. �O N �i0 � ur n j10 iK 6 6 N �, nn NSa T n O 6 N •.. T iz t �O , N, 6 O ... J d N my n p Y. O G N u A �aN1%ii n> ° 6Ni > JCN C W �^ 4 ;r > rte. N m N , n l • r N O n N N _ O f1 aw K O m l R C a N N O ryi 6 n S O n w O N n d m a� d IJi' y b� N n n M1 N �A ro_ a 1 m G„ O r N O r � 4 3 JN y. � O i w , O T rN. n Vim 1v p m ^ n n i n r M 1�i. .>•1 w u. 1N NNnv To �wp a 7 i N 0 9 60n� ;K N.+ aZ pry, - p$ b Iw +• 2nn v�n c �irv� 'hn -= a d o I• N N S N O Lpa 6 N p(6p(�ugi R N J�1N �JY 9 i o- v v w w N m 6 ,M mn� , b �•a R w. t>C \ ul §J:; r.\1 all )§ ! \\ Z 2 §a {» . 5E \ } { I J2 {^ \9% §§ / .02 ul Ll §J:; \ I J2 {^ Ll ILJ E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1981 T0: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Rubbs, City Engineer SUSJECT: Director Review 79-68 - Lewis Properties 1977 At the time of the processing of Parcel Map 5545 for Lewis Properties at 9560 Ease Line, conditions of approval were included to corstruct a cui -de- sac and pedestrian access point on Roberus Court adjacent to the west boundary of the proposed project. As the engineer began to prepare plans for this cul- de -sac, he came into contact with several residents aloi►g the street who re- fused to cooperate in the design and to grant the necessary right of entry to allow the constriction of this improvement. she residents at that time met with the City Engineer and expressed their refusal to cooperate in road construction because of the removal of trees, shrubbery and the proximity of these improvements to their homes. In addition, the residents objected to inclusion of a pedestrian access between the proposed Cuter and Roberds Court. Because of these concerns and the inability to construct the cul-de-sac without property owner approval, these conditions were removed from Parcel Map 5545. At that time, it was overlooked that those same conditions were applicable to Director Review 79 -68 �4nich were adopted by the Planning Commission. This question being raised, it is appropriate for the Commission to hear the matter dit' n^ and concerns of the residents with these con to RECOMMENDATION: Because of the impracticality of constructing the proposed cul -de -sac without property owner consent and in reaction to residents concern on access,it is recommended that the Commission adopt the attached resolution ames.ding the conditions of Director Review 79 -68 to exclude these conditio�es. Respectfully sub itted, LBli j Attachment J ITEM E RESOLUTION NO. 79-76 lalh A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING. DIRECTOR REVIEW 140. 79 -E8 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF BASE LINE. BETNEEN ARCHIBALD AND AMETHYST. WHEREAS, on the 9th day of November, 1979, a complete application was filed for review of the above described project; and WHEREAS, on the 12th day of December, 1979, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above described project. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: I. That the site indicated by the development plan is adequate is size and shape to accommodate the proposed use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, landscaping, loading and other features required by this section. 2. That the improvements as indicated on the development plan are located in such a manner as to be properly related to existing and proposed streets and highways. 3. That the improvements as shown on the development plan are consiste7,t with all adopted standards and policies as set forth in this section. SECTION That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on December 12, 1979. SECTION 3: That Director Review No. 79 -68 is approved subject to completing and satisfying all conditions 'of approval contained herein prior to occupancy of the buildings and operation of proposed business. Applicant shall �ontAct. the Planning Division for compliance with the following conditions: I. Site shall hp <lcvclo;uxi in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Building elevations for the bank are requi.rei, to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. Existina Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for - 2-moval at the discretion of the Planning Division during tr.e review It of the Master Plan of existing on -site trees. Those trees which are approved for removal shall 1x rek.acod on a tree - 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance_ with 14. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees City Ordinances in effect at time of Building Permit issuance. 4. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high exterior streets. masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to Cit, and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 5. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as provided by the Planning and Building Divisions. 6. This approval does not constitute approval of the restaurant pad. Separate site approval is required for the az!­:'_opment of that Pad. 7. Prior.to occupancy of either building, total on and off -site improvements shall be completed. 8. Parking lot lights shall be a maximum height of 12' and directed away from all property lines, adjacent streets and residences. 9. Parking lot trees shall be .:.minimum 15 gallon size. ® 10. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 11. A detailed landscape and irrigation -.an shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. A Master Plan of the existing on site trees shall be provided to the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits and prior to grading to determine which trees shall be retained. 13. Existina Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for - 2-moval at the discretion of the Planning Division during tr.e review of the Master Plan of existing on -site trees. Those trees which are approved for removal shall 1x rek.acod on a tree - for -tree basis as provided by the Planning Division 14. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 15. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 16. The restaurant pad shall be temporarily turfed and irrigated. Such details shall be included on the landscape plan. 17. Dense landscaping is required in the planter along the west property line. LB. Any signs propos.ad for this develol..ment shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 19. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the Planing Division for their review and approval prior to occupancy of the building. 20. A change of zone for the stpject property from C -1 to A -P shall be accomplished prior to occupancy of the site. Applicant shall contact the Building Division for compliance with the following conditions: 21. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the tine of approval of this project. 22. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. 23. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development., the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking fees. 24. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval. 25. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, Ci y Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. 26. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall he completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit. r'1 Applicant shall contact the Enginccring Division for co.ipliance with she following con(':tions: 27. Necessary street and drainage improvements small be provided per the conditions for Parcel Map 5545, including a cul -de -sac for Robards Street. 28. The driveway on the west side of the project will be subject to final approval of the City Engineer as to dimensions and geometry. 29. That Parcel Map 5545 be approved and recorded prior to issuance of building permits for the project. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1979. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Herman Rempel Herman Rempel, Chair an ATTEST: _ Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca- monga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced„ passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of -he City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of December, 1979, by the following vote to wit: AY1'S: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, JONE£, GARCIA, TOLSTOY, RUIPEL NOES: COMMISSIOVERS: NONE ABSENT: COMM ISSI0N:CS: NONE f I i t I f l Y \I 'K fly 1 I� 1j I 1 4 Y� I \ f 1( ti� l 1 .4•� t 15 f li. I r 111 � " If , 1 1• ( '1 1 1 1' � .�. I ,\ I I- 1 r 1. 5 4 ,I :• X11 1 �y 1 I I I ( \ y •f 4 i •' � i Ilt 1 1 I f'• Ih' . ' I Lai a • 3 1 \ .y.n � .� .,• 1 1.1.,1"'7771 1 (1 III yll or 1 =e r, aauaaaoa� .Y JIM ' 19NOW0909 089918 VZVld VUU31S nT I 1 1I V , , �' d 13i •T I I � � d o � � � � , I � 1 I � 1 •;w 1 - � 3 , .. •era — � ; . �, -`- �- I _ I' is ur °I♦ 1 • r .•- p 1 k ` 2 r ,•HEN /^ s xt gpl- ^r. 1 -, • 1 ry/ ' u' A � I ( 1 � !n. 1I �� I�! Y. I • I �f I' a I z. t Iw f7 � a �1 i 1 3 �`• • ^ w • 4•LCM •' w A.. i Ir �g. s;s I' is ur °I♦ 1 • r .•- p 1 k ` 2 r ,•HEN /^ s xt gpl- ^r. 1 -, • 1 ry/ ' u' A � I ( 1 � !n. 1I �� I�! Y. I • I �f I' a I z. t Iw f7 � a �1 i 1 3 �`• • ^ w • 4•LCM •' w A.. i Ir �g. s;s 2 r ,•HEN /^ s xt gpl- ^r. 1 -, • 1 ry/ ' u' A � I ( 1 � !n. 1I �� I�! Y. I • I �f I' a I z. t Iw f7 � a �1 i 1 3 �`• • ^ w • 4•LCM •' w A.. i Ir �g. s;s �`• • ^ w • 4•LCM •' w A.. i Ir �g. s;s YI . -(.. 3 • —O WIDE' CONC. RIBBON GUTTER •(TYP.) .60' —O "' 2% TO 4% PALL (TYP.) r 6'-O" HIGH BLOCK WALL (DECORATIVE TO MATCH BLDG.) ►r C7 z z J a w IL V 0 z J w en Z w 0 _�Soa City Council f -- City of Rancho Cucaeo.a 9320 Baseline Alta Loma, CA. 91701 +t'e, thc- owncre ci lard fronting Robcrdo Court (iar-t of Amethyst), do hereby petition your hcnorabie body reouesting the abandonment of the existing stred.. Rirhts of Way. 1 It has comf: to our attention that a permanent cul -de• -sac is to 'se constructed at the end of Robe -do Court with plane for widening Roberds Court and installing curbs and gutters in the future. This street is 3291 long end will never be extended due to development on the property to the east lend r Nall being constructed along that property line. The sole puepose of the street is for access to .even residences. We are aware that according to city code it is a substandard street. We would like to retain its rural atmcsphere. We would assume responsibility for its maintenance. If this petition is accepted we .could also ask permission to change tho name of Roberds Court to Roberds Road. pe l C. and Diane Williams 7251 Amethyst - S 1651 fronting Roberds Ct. 95111 Roberds Ct. - S 1051 fronting Roberds Ct. Wayne and Erma Dennis Chock and Lila age s1 r 9549 Roberds Ct. — S 561 froncinP Roberds Ct. 7235 Amethyst - N 1401 fronting Roberds Ct. 9532 Roberds Ct. - 9540 nobcrds Ct. - 9542, Roberds 0t. - F 166° fronting Roberds Ct. A11Ia.,Roberdo 9549 Roberds Ct. — S 561 froncinP Roberds Ct. 7235 Amethyst - N 1401 fronting Roberds Ct. 9532 Roberds Ct. - 9540 nobcrds Ct. - 9542, Roberds 0t. - F 166° fronting Roberds Ct. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANiNO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING AMI.NDMENT TO CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR DIRECTOR R'VIEW NO. 79 -68 LOCATED AT 9560 BASE LINE ROAD. WHEREAS, on the 12th da,f of December, 1979, Director Review No_ 79 -68 was approved by t'-a Pla mine Commission by Resolution No. 7a- 76: anI WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July the Rancho Cucam ^nga mlanning Commission held a meeting to consider the amendment to said ResolutioI which established cul -de -sac and block wall requirements as condition; of approval for the above- descriled project; and, WHEREAS, the condition! of approval for the subdivision of said projects land, Parcel Map Nc. 5545 was amended by the City Engim:er under authority of Ordinance No. 2E of the City Council of the City o' Rancho Cucamonga removed such cul -de -sac requirement on Roberds Court; and WHEREAS a petition to the Roberds Court requested eliminati:+n would not grant a right -of- entry Co objection to a pedestrian access in NON, THERErJRE, THE RAN :h RESOLVED AS FOLLGNS: City Council by the owners frortii,g of such cul -de -sac requ':rement and construct same and further voices: an above - mentioned block wall. CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION Section 1: That the fe'ilowing findings have been made: a. That the cul -de -sac is not essential to public health end safety. b. that the pedestrian traffic through the residential street of Roberds Court is undesireable Section 2: That Rnso "ution No. 79 -76 is hereby revised to I liminate the requirem -.nts of a permanent cul -de -sac improve- meets and a Pedestrian, access on Roberds Court as provided in Section 3, item 28 of sail Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ;ANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y- Jeffrey King, Chairman _ ' i K] El 0 a Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: oecretary oi t a Planning Commi on I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the rite of Rwnr:hn biramnnoa. at a regular mettinq of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July, 1981 b; the following vote to- wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT COMMISSIONERS: COMMIISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: El L , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development Rv• Otte rrouti7. Associate Planner SUBJECT: NEEVA EIR (Reference: Tentative Tract 11550 and Zone Change No. 80 -11) - Consideration and review of an Envi- ronmentel Impact Report (EIR) prepared for a residential condominium project consisting of 662 dwelling units on 65 acres of land, generally located on the south side of milson, about )i mile east of Haven - APN 201- 191 -07 ABSTRACT: The attached Focused Environmental Impact Report was prepared for a 662 unit residential condominium project located on 65 acres of land on the south side of Wilson, just east of Chaffey College. The Focused EIR identifies a number of potential environmental problems and proposes a wide range of mitigation measures xo counter these problems. While the EIR is generally complete, additional mitigation measures are recommended by staff to alleviate environmental impacts notid by various organizations and individuals commenting on the Draft EIR. Staff recommends that the EIR be modified to include certain corrections and additional mitigation measures, and be forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation for certification. I. BACKGROUND: In August 1980, Ne2va Corporation, the applicant, filed a tentative tract map, development plans, and a request for a zone change from A -1 -5 to R-3 in order to obtain necessary appr,)vals for the construction of a 662 -unit residential condominium project on about 65 acres located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, just east of the Chaffey College campus. On September 24, 1980, the Planning Commission reviewed the environmental aspects of the project and determined that the proposal has a Potential of creating significant adverse impacts on the environment. Consequently, the preparation of a Focused Environmental Impact Report was required to address the project's impacts on the areas of Soils and Geology, Hydrology, Flora and Fauna, Population, Social- Economic conditions, Transportation, Utilities, Health and Safety and Cumulativp Impacts on surrounding land uses. The EIR, prepared by the City's consultant, Donald G. King and Associates, is before you tonight for your review and consideration, along with an appendix (Section 11.10) containing comments from the general public and interested agencies and organizations. The purpose of the Commission's review and the public hearing is to: ITEM F Neeva EIR Staff Report -2- July 22, 1981 a. Determine whether the EIR adequately covers all areas of reasonable concern; b. determine whether the mitigation measures proposed by the EIR Pffprtivply mitinatp nnt:pntial advpwca imnartc- c. recommend changes, modifications, and additional mitigation measures to be incorporated into the final EIR prior to City Council certi- fication of the document; and d. identify those significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated if the project is built. At this point of the review process, the Commission's actions should be limited to the EIP. and not to the development itself. Once all necessary mitigation measures are identified, the project will be revised and formally resubmitted for Planning Commission action. II. ANALYSIS: In general, the Focused EIR addresses all areas of concern identified by the Planning Commission, and in some instances rovers areas well beyond its intended scope. However, staff has received a number of responses and comments from various organizations and individuals, which merit consideration (see Appendix 11.10)_. These responses are aimed at the issue areas outlined below; Staff recommendations for EIR modifications and additional mitigation measures follow: 1. PROJECT DENSITY: EIR and Staff support reduction in density for incremental reduction in density - related impacts. Mitigation Measure: Reduce project density to no more than 8 du's /ac, in accordance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 2. TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Traffic related impacts identified in the report do not appear to warrant Milliken Avenue extenrioi, at this time. However, additional measures are recommPndej to alleviate traffic related impacts on the residences at Wilson and on access to Chaffey College. Mitigation Measures: a. Restrict vehicular access to Wilson Avenue to limited and /or emergency access only. Neeva EIR Staff Report -3 July 22, 1961 b. Construct Wilson Avenue improvements to the intersection with Banyan Avenue loop extension near the northeast corner of site. c. Construct adequate Banyan Avenue extension improvements trom Haven Avenue up to Wilson Avenue, in accordance with the Circu- lation Element of the General Plan. d. Revise site plan to provide for primary project access on Banyan Avenue. 3. PROJECT COMPATIBILITY The EIR calls for site plan changes and redesign of the units adjacent to Wilson Avenue. Due to the sersitivity of the area, additional weasures are recommended: Mitiqation Measures: a. Itevise dwelling units along Wilson Avenue to a type and style compatible with existing residential development along north side of the street. Avoid a "walled community" effect along Wilson. b. Revise architectural design of all proposed structures to avoid harsh„ geometric forms, excessive repetition of identical buildings, use of unconventional materials, or other urban -like features. c. Revise site plan design to provide adequate open space and recreational amenities and to create non -urban character within the project as well as along the project perimeter: The location of such open spaces should take advantage of existing open space areas on the Chaffey College campus to visually ce,nsolidate available open space, and to create vistas in both directions. Avoid use of solid walls in key areas along the project boundaries. d. The use of appropriate native plant materials in key areas of the site is recommended. 4. WATER QUALITY The applicant is proposing to utilize septic tanks in this project. Potential water quality problems could occur with on -site sewerage systems given the project density. Neeva "IR Staff Report -4- July 22, 1981 Mitigation Measure: Unless it car; be clearly shown by the developer that proposed septic systems will be non - polluting, appropriate sewer extensions aLu WA11 be required. 5. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Appendix 11.10 contains several other comments for your consideration, which deal with solid waste, water resources, flood control, cumulative impacts on areawide transportation and others. However, staff feels that these items have been adequately addressed by the consultant's responses, also in the Appendix. III.. APPLICATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES If t" Final EIR is certified with mitigation measures as recommended by staff, the project site plan and general design criteri, will require substantial modifications. Among other changes, the number of dwellings within the project will be limited to -+520, circulation and access pro- visions will be completely revised, unit types along Wilson will be modified, and substantial open space areas and recreational facilities will be required. A preliminary site plan for the revised project, prepared by the project architect, has been enclosed for your comment, (Exhibit "A "), The revised site plan incorporates most of the mitigation measures recommended by the EIR and staff. However, staff would suggest that a greater variety of building styles be utilized to avoid excessive repetition and monotony (especially along Banyan Avenue extension),that the northerly project entrance be moved to the south, and that precise public street alignments. be worked out prior to formal submittal. It should also be noted the substantial . amount of open space available witlein the revised project is at least partially clue to the utilization of subterranean parking and three -stnry structures. While no action on ti;n site plan is necessary at this time, the Commission may wish to offer comments and guidance to the applicant to assure that the intent of the mitigation measures as specified in the EIR will be satisfied. IV. UNAVOIDABi.E ADVERSE IMPACTS The EIR identifies several areas of adverse impacts which cannot be totally mitigated or avoided if the project is built. These impacts are uutlined below. to Neeva EIR Staff Report -5- July 22, 1981 1. The project will contribute incrementally to regional air pollution. In a region not already impacted by air quality problems, such in- cremental increase in pollutants would not be considered significant. 2. Grading of the site will result in a loss of natural vegetation. Mile some of the vegetation (Riparian Coastal Sage Scrub) is considered "most endangered" type, the construction of the Deer Creek Flood Control Channel by the Army Corps of Engineers will cause the ultimate demise of this vegetation type on the project site regardless of this project. 3. Cummulative growth in the project area wilt impact fire service capability of the Fire District, and a new fire station will be neeaed. However, according to the District, the individual Impacts of this project alone are not substantial enough to warrant con- struction of a new station at this time. Standard fire mitigation measures, such as adequate building separations, fire retardant roofing materials, sufficient fire flow, and efficient M. ergency access will be required as a condition of project approval. 4. The project will generate about 1,680 people, thus increasing the need for public park and recreation facilities which do not now exist. However, since substantial on -site recreational facilities will be required as a mitigation measure, this impact does not appear significant. In addition. the project would be required to pay the park fee as established by the Council. V. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Commission review the EIR and all comments and responses contained in Appendix 11.1.0, and that a public hearing be held to consider all public input. If, after such hearing, the Commission concurs with staff recommendations, the adoption of the attached Resolution (recommending certification of the Final EIR with modification and additional mitigation mea ures a.; outlined herein) would be appropriate. Re ecct�tf %rugly ubmitted, lam/ -�, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:OK :cd As Attachemnts RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING CERTIFICATION OF A FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT CON- SISTING OF 662 DWELLING UNITS ON 65 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WILSON, ABOUT 1/2 MILE EAST OF HAVEN - APN 201- 191 -07 (REFERENCE: TT 11550 AND ZONE CHANGE 80 -111_ WHEREAS, on the 24th day of September, 1980, the Planning Commission determined the need for a Focused Fnvironmental Impact Report for the above- referenced project; and WHEREAS, such Focused Environmental Impact Report has been prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quaility Act guidelines; and WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of July, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED: Section 1: Findings: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission does hereby make the o owing findings: 1. That the Focused Environmental Impact Report, with modifications as recommended in the attached Staff Report, adequately addresses all areas of reasonable environmental concern. 2. That the significant adverse impacts identified in the Environmental Impact Report will be adequately mitigated through the application of mitigation measures recommended for inclusion in the final Environmental Impact Report. Section 2: Recommendations: It is therefore recommended that the final Environmental Impact Report, with modifications, be certified by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JULY, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST Secretary of the Panning Commission Resolution No. Page 2 I, JACK, LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of July, 1981 by the following vote to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOLS: COMMISSIONERS: n 11 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM July 22, 1981 Members of the Planning Commission Jack Lam. Director of Community Development Michael Vairin, Senior Manner BACKGROUND: Staff has further researched these standards and finds further complications and issues which must be resolved prior to adoption standards. We will bring this back to the Commission upon resolution of these issues. Respectfully Jubmitted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:14V:cd av� ITEM G syal WIN Ll E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORAWARTM r: c � ! M DATE: July 22, 1561 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development BY: Barry K. Hogar, City Planner SUBJECT: ADMI141STRATIVE REGULTATIONS FOR EQUESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMI'OrE Due to the large amount of tract's that are currently submitted, it has become necessary to jormaalize the operation and duties of the Equestrian Advisory Committee. Please rind copy attached for your information and use. Should we receive no comments, we will implement them as pronosed. If you have comments or question.;, please contact our office. Res Fectfully su witted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:BKH:cd Enclosure ITEM H ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS PLANNING COMMISSION EQUESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE p,,....�� OW" - A. Selection of C(.,anittee Members Selection of Committee Members sh ?il be made by the anning Commission. The( Committee shall be eompov.pa of nnp rnmmicei_na, ,,�a �Wv mcuwc a di. large (City residency required), and the City Planner or his de- signated representative. B. Term of appointment: Terms shall be one year, beginning with appointment or reappointment at the first regular Planning Com- mission meeting in July and expiring at the last regular Plan- ning Commission meeting in June the following year. The only exception would. be the staff member whose term will be permanent. C. Appointment of Chairman: The chairman shall be the City Planner or his designated na�te representative. D. Res onsi6ilities of Committee: The Committee shall be respon- sib a for t e review of all tracts and developments that are within the Equestrian /Rural area as designated in the adnpted Trails Element of the General Plan and in accordance with the City Council Resolution No. 81 -92, Trail Standards. E. Meetings-: One meeting per month shall be held at 10 a.m. on the first Tuesday of the month at the City Hall Community Development Conference Room. Other meetings may be held as necessary when called by the Chairman. At least 3 days notice is required for meetings. F. Staff: The staff of the Planning Division shall be the staff of the Equestrian Advisory Committee, G. Quorum: A quorum shall be three members present. H. Voting: A tie vote shall be deemed denial. 11 L 11 CITY OIL' RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 22, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Paul A. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Vacation of 7th Street at Center As a result of planning for building expansion, Royal Creations, a manufacturing firm on Center Avenue, has raised the issue of the status of the future of 7th Street, which forms the north border of the property. A dedication of right -of -way now exists where 8th Street would eventually be built, but no street improvements exist. The right -of -way has been used for some time for employee parking and the company has based its expar,sion plans upon the continued use of the right -of -way for that purpose. Staff 's position has been that a public street (of reduced width, 54' rather than 80'; should be retained for local circulation and access to the north, as well as possible continuation to the west. Further information will be presented at the meeting to clarify the property and street configurations in the area so that the Commission can consider all implications of eliminating the street. The Commission will be asked to make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the requested street vacation. lly submitted, LBH:PAR:j as ITEIII I