Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981/11/10 - Agenda Packetr 6 �f �: v I r I 1 II ,� I r ill r t I r I. I � '• •'b `'�� \ � t ,�1 _ ', 1 I/� t 1 'll. a 1 ui1:1 1 11 11 I'4`y I !• y �` • �� 1 ! ! 1 1 t�' I .I I' I !� I �� •1 1 1 1 I�r 1', � ` ' I r �J r GI i li �.: �a 1 1 ♦ 1� It l': 51\ I. 1' 1- �• . +r 1�f 1 �lA� 1• 1 r' 1 i•?'w I:!r/ ..li •\fir �.[ r. �t 1 li' 1 It I s I•C 1 4 Sy J� I, 1,In)I \. I 1 1 r t Rc �" ;1. ly �Y .�. 7.. A C T I O N CITY OF RANCI-D CUC.A.MQ4GA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA NOVEMBER 10, 1981 LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE L1NE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. R011 Call Commissioner Dahl X Commissioner King X Commissioner Rempel X III. Announcements Commissioner Sceranka _ X Commissioner Tolstoy X IV. Consent Calendar The following consent calendar items are expected to APPROVED 5 -0 -0 be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the commission at one time without discussion. .rf anyone has concern over any item, then it should be removed for discussion. A. ENVIRONMEN1AL M55tJ,bmtlll Ann ueert.vri-jr-m nLv1L- NO. 81 -34 - HOFGAAROEN - The development of a 10,000 square foot industrial building addition cn 1.37 acres of land, located in the General Industrial zone, at 8780 Archibald - APN 209 - 031 -49. V. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concenied individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. APPROVED 4-1 -0 B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -05 - EDISON - The Subject to additional 3eve opment of an electri�:ai d stribution sub Conditions of Approval station on 4.78 acres of land in the R -1 -20 zone located on the northwest corner of Archibald and Wilson Avenues - APN 1061 - 571 -04. APPROVED 5 -0 -0 with amendments to Conditions APPROVED 5 -0 -0 Planning Commission Agenda •� November 10, 1981 Page Two C. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11934 - VICTORIA WINDROWS qiLLA -y7M UON CURFANT-- rac su 1v I's ion consisting of 756 lots orr, 192+ acres of land in the Planned Community zone, a portion of the Victoria Planned Community, located north of Base Line Road, south of Highland Avenue, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. D. REDEVELU REPORT - Impact R VI. Old Business c review of the Draft Environmental to the Redevelopment Plan VII. New Business E. TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING: APPROVED 5 -0 -0 Tentative Tract No. 7'.605 Tentative Tract No. 9369 -11173 Tentative Tract No. 9665 APPROVED 5 -0 -0 APPROVED 5 -0 -0 VIII IX. :'C recommended that a Town Meeting be held X soon. XI. F. CITY ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES G. DETERP4INATION OF GENERAL PLAW CONSISTENCY OF THE DRAFT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN - A determination on th consistency of the uraTt Redevelopment Plan with the General Plan. Council Referrals Director's Reports H. STATUS OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. Upcoming Agenda XII. Adjournment The Planning Conmdssion has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the.consent of the Commission. CL O � •� W_ac. = c 5 to\ �. WJ S v °u U N r = u s " m W= e• c, Q z 2 U. LL a W rt r a N 3AV AUUMD H Z W LL Q W b N � 2 ¢ a � z 3R! VQNVM113 1 3nN3nV ;£ o a 9 � � W W 3AV N3AVN '! d'1VOIN;IUV q Y g 6 / � 6 arm as „AaNln ,. r r .. a 3 y \7 W U Q 4CV r y oA � O° Q 0( Q Fzz- 6��1i O 3nN3nV REQUEST TO ADDRESS �o THE PLANNING C01Wx111IYISSION � Y > Z bate 1977 Name C - •) ` � a +U✓ Telephone Address : Relationship to Agenda Item Name of Ptelia Smmmary of Comments . (Z�J; REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION r = o a DateY •- J!/ r Name : f C r , ,9USc Telephone Address . 0 Relationslup to Agenda Item Name of Item Summary of Comments : 1977 REQUEST TO ADDRESS - THE PLANNING COMMISSION Nome: — din L' Telephone : Jk 980 09-KI Address : (oOA5 /3-� .4Arf LOAM Relationship to Agenda Itein : Name of Item Summary of Comments Date :�° REQUEST TO ADDRESS Cc( �b T THE PLANNING COMMISSION WO � Date Name : I _ ✓� � Telephone — Address Relationship to Agenda Item : Name of Item Summary of Comments . ; , x f) :{ C { Address •,,. tl Name of m Summary of Comments R.ESS [MISSION Date : I� V• iC I l REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1 Name : ' ,� r Telephone Address Relationship to Agenda Item Name of item Date : a4 c� f,� '> 0 Jy i»7 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION Name : -,1g11GIS W, _ -61jez Telephone Address : Relationship to Agenda. Item : Name of Item Summary of Comments Date : /A /a � . I I I I '., I � � � I I A If f '1 f �� A ♦ I I 1•.f �I•'I 1 I IAI 0 cif I I f I I 1 ,1 1 1 , 1 ,1, 9 �• 1 ` y 1 •V :fl I I • I REQUEST TO ADDRESS -1' LANNING COMMISSION .� • 4e f'i •� �� / .. Name: Telephone Addrm / v 7i Relationship to Agenda Item ',� Name of m ' r • I• c' f. . 0 �•,I • ..' 1, ti r' fl f aT •I � ff ' I Ity� ``� , i 11 1 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. STAFF REPORT DATE: November 10, 1981 10: Me ^bers of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack. Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: 81 - HOFGAARDEN - The development or a tu,cuu square foot industrial building addition on 1.37 acres of land, located in the General Industrial zone at 8780 Archibald Avenue - APN 209 - 031 -49 ABSTRACT: The Applicant is requesting review and approval of the development of an industrial building as described above. The project has been reviewed by the Design and Development Review Com- mittees and is now before the Planning Commission for environmental assessment. BACKGROUND: The environmental assessment is made in order to determine whether or not there would be any significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. The detailed Site Plan and elevations will be reviewed and approved with conditions by the City Planner, contingent upon approval of the Negative Declaration by the Planning Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by r- Applicant an is attached for your review and consideration. Staf" has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and has founr: no significant adverse impacts on th- environment as a result of this project. ITEM A Environmental Assessment /DR 81 -34 -2- November 10, 1981 RECOMMENDATION: Based upon analysis of the Er,'!ironmental Study, it appears that the project will not cause sionificant adve -se impacts upon the environ- ment. If the Commission concurs, then the issuah;e of a Negative Declaration for the project would be in order. Respectfully s bmitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:AT:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map and site Plan Exhibit "B" - Elevations Initial Study Part I c. ii: •1 El 0 Ll 4) • P -� 4(iP "':' RCS /— �yl�.w.ila rwiui:: ^icsiu Od ' 1�- ..1 i 1�1 it _ __.I'— _ ��., �.... �..r.•� .�.�. -n `I^ •��,�IL:,r., - 'L.an�.'I� .. I�7. C�rz.. �l � II �j Yam' � ::. :r��...��_ s_ HL rx- ' :I •-'lam I: r�l 'is:�.l.?: -�t_'� •� Z17- II i � }1 CITY OF RANCHO C;CANIONGA PLANNING DIVISION C [FORTH ITCX1: IR A0 -3q TITLE- ©nirjo-ft EF:Ii1mT— SCALE- n+c4�� .;NYE 4. 4rr Ll JA ✓ V NORTH CITY OF IMM: A bR. $1 .34 RANCHO CUCAMONTGA TITLE: 14^jQaA&&rAv�n- PLANNING DIVISON Exi-imT. A 4 scA -steAwch CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $80 -00 For all projects reaui.ring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee thrcr.gh the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Envirornn..ental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet_ and take action no later than ten (1C) days '.before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact 2enort will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report sho,'d be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. �f ii % % /? PROJECT TITLE: ' �� / Y C !� APPLICANT'S _i ME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: t3 ) 7:'y1 =3 ygo NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: t�! _'-° - LOCATION OF PRO ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR• PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: V a -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROY'ECpT: L %�I(_� �q!iCZ1 00 �rl /!7 Gt C i d i w �. is O p 7co e, ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND S( P/R�OPOSED.µ)BUILDIiiGS, IF /ANY: OF EXISTING AND e, ?',ccCiPS DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMEL UAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT: SITE INCI:UDING INFOR&TION 0I? TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREI ;S), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROIJNDING P.ROPE TIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OT ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES, AND THEIR USE,(ATTAsH NECESSARY SHEETS): Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a f,eriee, of cumulative actions, which although individually mall., mak as awhole have significant environmen(taI iimpact'-, •. 414,e 1'Q, yLG e-'1(0 1(n 4 .11 21/,- . �6LJ - f, 01 �- 2 1� Create a substantial change in ground ' contours? Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? -reate a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? r Remove any existing trees? How many? create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as ?.oxic substances, flammables or explosives? any YES answers above- , 1 , the project involves the construction of ;idential units, complete the form on the ,rt page. I hereby certify that the statements furnished ie attached exhibits present the data and -,uired for this initial evaluation to the lity, and that the facts, statements, and esented are true and correct to the best of nd belief. I further understand that ormation may be required to be submitted .ni -uate evaulation can be made by the Development �., .. , .,,. ..1. 'e. �- C' �=�y- /C%.� Signature .� • * _ _ ._.: _.._ 'GAARDEN Title /9'e / %798 -34801 �.IIM•b,N. J11 TIO 91107 q J L E E DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STUFF REPORT November 10, 1981 Members of the Planning Commission Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -05 - EDISON - The develop- ment of a❑ electrical distribution /substation on 4.78 acres of land in the R- 1- 20,000 zone located on the north- west corner of Archibald and Wilson Avenues - APN 1061 - 571 -04. ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission at its meeting held a public hearing to ra:sider the abeve- describe request. The Planning Commission, a tFr reviewing the Staff Report and conducting a public hearing, required the applicant to submit additional infor- mation regarding the following items: 1. The economic impact on available sites. 2. Adjacent user impacts in terms of surrounding awn o-es— ana— envirornnuni.u1 „ a��• 3...E�asih;lity of alternate site location_in terms of znn,na_ p y ica cond7tions ,ucn as slope and drainage, availability of the land, etc. Attached please find copies of the study prepared by the Edison Company addressing these concerns. The information appears minimal, and for the most part is merely rewording of information previously reviewed by the Commission. A'.so attached are copies of the June 24 and August 12, 1981 Planning Ccimni5siOn Staff Reports which fully describe the project and contain an analysis of environmental 'impacts based upon information submitted by the Edison Company. If the Com- mission feels that all environmental concerns have been adequately mitigated to an acceptable level, then the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit requires two actions; 1) adoption Of a Negative Declaration, and (2) adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. ITEM B Conditional Use Permit 81 -05 -2- November 10, 1981 CORRESPONDENCE: A notice has been placed in The Daily R_ eport newspaper advertising this as a public hearing and notices vlere sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project boundaries. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public 'c hearing to consider all public input relative to concerns of this project. Upon reviewing the concerns and considerations regarding this development, it is recommended that the Planning Commission take action to either find the development consistent and compatible with the City's guidelines or deny the project should the Commission find that this facility cannot be constructed to mitigate the concerns to an acceptable level. Respectfully submitted, .6 JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:DC:jr Attachments: Study Prepared by Edison Company Planning Commission Minutes from 8/12/81 and 6/24/81 Staff Reports Resolution of Approval Conditions 3 '❑' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81 -05 FOR ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SUBSTATION LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AND WILSON AVENUE IN THE R -1 -20 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the 3rd day of March, 1981, a complete application was filed by Southern California Edison Company for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of November, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions 40 applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on November 10, 1981. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 81 -05 is approved sub' ct to the fo low, ,co ions nd at c ed Stand condition /►/C�/ 1.r That the detailed landscape and irrigation pla shallP conform to the approved site plan, except as otherwise provided herein. 2, that trees be provided every 15 feet around the outside erimeter wall on the west and north side with shrubs planted between the trees for screening purposes, using tree well inset/ hat t e IIfornia Black Oak be specimen size trees and tha tonal specimen size trees be provideddalong Avenue to meet sp ciaardjbtan ar s� •� Resolution No. Page 2 4. That trees be planted at the base of both transmission lane poles to reduce visual impact. 5. Installation of a portion of the master planned storm drain on Wilson Avenue with adequate catch basin con- nections contiguous to the subject project shall be required. The drainage fee for the project shall be credited towards the cost of this drain. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TVIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF P.ANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: _ Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho 40 Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November, 1981 by the following vote to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: u w '' v L ✓p q P� u O V O - •Ca' P V •W V M L WG N C 4 V C VO V+ •rdi 6'q J LC� N O Y. dub y•r q p �N` A 4✓ •l1Y L/ „y N ` • T L 9 q C,JU�r V ^� V Y•d•q^ u y!•^ YV «V VV rG T NW ✓O L l LO NCVY � ^lV• 6 �Uq Nd.^�N••• b NV ✓.^ of is C a 6 q V u Db ✓ ` �bo ^L-10 T `W Per d^ l6 bV = A W A 13 •O-/ • 4+• NN L CV �✓ �O L r C d J✓C V ly w q'f) A ` N4E[bV'NY J C N u A ` E:. � N ;.t'✓ E :, =ao =o ` ^ q Q �4 cW Y p° tli « >ob\/i✓ 4 d qN q� V � u•Ne= L NV L L6quL i.b ✓pY 4 •� qu �r U w D+ b C> Y � � • EuVLr GL S q O •^ C p q N ^ a•^ V 4 N � • DC.N�4 N T L r b d� CAl' N A WD O l: W Ci 4 N •^ N4 YC 6 V �j O� �4LL V ✓y 4 .110 \I.00C qO M u C Vq M N q M CI G ` + V V C � Vq G ✓ V T V C Nr •_C C � A ✓ L N ✓y q L •.• q N Y V U y✓ C C G• O L u G. J C N � ."• O- 6 J •^ Ci N L .� M 4 w N r N V N q n r � Apl L V O V O •^ Ir N N C C O O O✓ ^C (J/ ✓ q C r ✓ Y •^ W A P 6 V r N L 6 6 W •^ � %\ V O C C a •�� V `^r T tN'r IJ Y q ^O �!^Gy ✓ >L ut'CVI N P L y' ^ O O C q N q p N M 4u q ~ yy =„ o aL A L Ju V G N N C V O. R.- o wu L L c�f'_.•W Y l C >, ✓ua 4 lT�'•"u 7r VY D4 bll .�, � A u .D�p N> •••� q br nr o I L .•< r � {N. IV tn•L¢ Nq Ol Mr CCl d• b CL /0Vy_G Y L!4 nIW�Vd a {1P uuL �/ C NU ^V• V: W • N} N N L N N �• O O'LLbd C C L WC f. > N•^N L l l pq V �• A dd DV NU Cr VO G} •T NO S W >u P LP p CQVC L N NY. WVVL>� VOO q Y bDL C•^ NLLr =OC b✓V• C b q W d D •"• O ^� Au O L N q p •^ .^6Lq 4 'q 2 L' I U � WLr_y c t O W L b wLp V '.• VCN } S d C G p q 4O L � V a L N� I � N N d N'•• q C C: Z P q r y d 46. •LV- Y L yy// •^ 6 V q •'- rr \. P N V - L rp L q C C ,� � .t] Y O 4 4✓ 4 y� V •. N ^ T � 2✓ c L • O Y•✓ V�rV O YLV CCJJ l'c N �L O u \>/r C 4 V Pu✓b �. mp O 4 V C d C.q_ ^qY \F .•N . ^�f C O 4 •^ V L rF'V uU N O ..V J% Y VE '•• O\'JO C` Nq l u' N W Y C✓ �y vT 4V C.l [ w C4 Onr JE�p« W •�� +• bL LW N . Fd huu NOL W!]cV „-c oL W N� V� o•^ W W l '> 0= q4 - V R w i 2L JM f? P p 8. C Y/ K O•^ UL N V `l O O g V C W V ZV C V ✓ 46 O y�J(i ^ ^✓ N tY� C••• N V✓ V O lr VVVGV.} Y Q r^ L PN N•^ 6q N b+ aC LJ V N E C ✓Od V VAV N \r TO gNVyY 4 ✓C Vq Fq r r V•L V•6 W V+-OD C Ci L C +•p O LL r VC •^1. O pI T1 ^ W L V CV l ^rb••• -V A 6VI li N� Ly CL�C + NVdc ^J Qr•�/ �G � Lq P �. 4 Y V JO .V V 1/ Tr q '•• = C � L T4w2 V L V O L W P� fIL .^ ✓.•- L .7E! N d V ,•• r Up 4 •tu r W✓ O q fL- G • '• ^V ^ a •^^ W VC •^ U V A4 V NJ lM•= ✓„ V y C '^C+•V d4 L M r p ^ C N C N e p -« R L L L W L 4 w Q4 M4 6q V \/1 C •C L Z x Y-. ULVA } 6O G. b M \O q O• O V fn R M \O •+ •"• ••• •"• ^• N N N N N N N N c fV Of o .Y- o•.. A c iu 4« � �w� V p. 2 ° �o ub +• YO i�s u4^ � y N P 6 QO t O q C� 4 All } �✓ N � L• V G C ^ 6 C �p/ `yy d ••O' T� O L W {Q6 n > •Nir != �- L rni• y N +J vJ• N ll Q V'I L p Jr V y V 4 O-•N. d� Y N C„ • n/y PV q L6 b•n G {r N A Y C N C �q L D L P yuCl �U C Y � W V u••41 q C M T W « r L n �C q J nl E i� �r ✓ 4 L .[W] /r N T u r V N Y A 4 6 N C A c E L V L+ O r d N y 4 y U- O O. } p V 2 E •^ P V 6 O F V t4L N b N S Q C O '/'V ✓J C w� ✓CO PL 06 N ^ rL O W 4•^ p T O^ N`'^ d d N V Vi O Y V V �� GN CV M b V•N L p bV- yN c CZ }• 4..^ '�• q p W.n W\F^ WL] NS.4 �_O ^ q p V G cc o- � wY o '^ °cc ✓,� VbW =bm .}/' •Gy _y O O `J� N Eow rP pq V TNV O ^•Cp \,•p In. bl,UN J� J �� O yC NC V yN•N � bJ Y'^ C � r r Vu NLL pqr d O LYV V W\�! • Q V O f. •^ V Z; d C A C q -V•C u yy 1! y •G / q T ::f 70w.> y V n O L �'!P L fl O o r � .^ wp A o s« u•^o LN ac Lam•^ oo V Y Ou 11CVU V N >• •� V C Y 6 'L N N V C V L N'^ L 4 V Y y b• q T C O d V V C •^ N q C •^V_ q 0 V C ti 4 q V Pp L d pC pT •� •1'1 L N E a Y O w .^ q +• a ✓'^ q 4 q P C ."• rq6 N Y A V^ — N Ir d 4 DZ]LV V V - qY Ll i•. T y Y O •^ O L L y y1 q N« c b U1 VLOU V �.V �A � d y0 « /•. ^ C Y q V pC C] q p ^ � M ^• J 6 Y 10 YI C . q O O q b 4 O p •r l •O O l•J } q +. a N q N >✓ + Y N P -O• q L W L L J i' W 4 Y u fIJ' 4 O O G O f[f,J/ a M q ^l q np V u r D ✓ N , WC u u y[C Z N 4 Cl (� aG VD W L D� GN y l NO u ^� O? �✓ 1- C W T O q L n 4 q r P Q N ,O V O q ][ ✓L` V •L• O q N u G N 6 1 i U i5 O g M N C W w p>p q C Lp d lu d L ,Ni, O O L V q C N C U N T V N P •.- 6^ rC� J V oN _ co V L^ d+ \• b L W q u 6 Y C J rL/r A u ^. } •••.� Q. O d• Y L: .I.l L qL O••-. 1O } VW 4 V ^q A — W v L PC V ^ n. q H Q 'Lq• •u •• C y G ••. p J O C 2 O 3 N V«✓ q p 6 •b .• v Y V Or V y O . O ✓ W W N L O V •9 ^ Y E N O-• E y d.^ L ✓y \�- w r E 4N CCL rC^•V �+V y q'l ,C VCV V N y V 4/ , rI� w N Y r > V O u W A p 6 V pO l✓ O q q V W q N/ •ON • q Y L P A y C J ^ L•^ t L %•1 wl L N qC u.•. .-� N �✓ r_•^j �l } Q 5•• ^ Vf� aLu.Y KNY pYY 1^O: 1"•Y9 S\IO. KC -E N 6�•L/ 1^VO. OYO tO N,LIr 4N hMV _• .• _a > � 14 ✓ v � — 3 �. $� ... f,i ri Ki \n to �I P o, � .�.. 1 >1 71 1 1>1 :u T O a v m C A ^ N._ N C� N 06 V 0 o „ L c c o g^ o u Nq Y V V b C NCO 3 2 _ b l'^ C 4JP 6 L W.r L V 6 Boa xp U y N !J C y ^A CW h• Y VOi 6 Vni ^ 0�1 JSC o,qv V U V Q N V T W q y cyv N v L .fir 3 P c u%9 v w W P li/Ji tt` V V L q Ca C 9 L' q .N + w.w.. c o. A 4 d G q V U Y _• N v�r � c m v N ^ N Y = M L T N W V „ 6i+ yO V V p Y N C l raD N L V � v a . 0 �u= O p c u N .P. L i 6 Y Jam] I xl 6 L' V p « d V V C 7 L N O w q u L C fl �N r b C' W N 9 L i l t' c N L rn�J P e uoN + T {LNO 4 j l C 6 m L o._ pLL q O d II i V T C l 6 q v „ V Y 1 L lN.LL r ` 0 0 b L V W w V'pF q N P pLA N W R OLL H ,Cn C q r 7 N � I W nl V s w C V = L r'< c N•^ e7; ^�L in iuN ry OL 6L N4 W1 O Vf= N✓>WPwO T`^ •-• 'D N C ... W L+ N o �^ G u 4 N C.L J •.. Y 6✓ A G V- N V C ^^'S�N« NfCU N P °L 016CC O C N ��na 'LYU WC O 4 Q1 C V C q V d OO YC� fyJ _ a L C V N ✓` L V ✓,°n W U V O Y O V •� QNUi `Nu ,„ C N i O V� N ^� L L V +NN V„ ' ` Dv .» N � v o O L V vii W L uY LVb V V^ tJ •_ t .G N V N O C V b •r N " •L"'}- L �., J) oC V C u O q `" CL. P D L w T^ V v1°.1 A NO C >v i. iw✓iA S�]I� ^1. .L.j �L Y 1. Y' L._ «y Q.°'o7�iv v R ^.F_VJryM CW L L L N WV 0 A u„ N •N O L � W_ b WC ^ q J„ Oq C •-• d O W J yNUb _^ o V O ` F m+ d y✓ ' ° N 6d L A N N A UO. P r � V C S ^ 9 q V C ✓ L"x• d V V ^q._ N „ N N E GiV'L UOA N A07Y q> ,+GY .q dVy >6NG C CO O� L Y CVI G °i q L N w G. �� C N'` O ^'.Q• W N V y O' u q l ^� °y' ; . G '.L- R.� � L: L L. L �' N« l 6 • ✓c. L LL' l nl b � �! L s ^ LL- 'V^ V C O V O C W O O L'_ L C [. N V G .n C u AbF u^ [IC tyy`gq ]L q Nye" ^V C.V N dLji Y ` OI V� vT N W a ^ q � V •^E V L r 6 L + N Y. LO � � V t ” V D � J fbp L W CW DVf P Vim✓ L Rq „, C`� d JFV i d f O:c ,:C V Wiyi n u u NNd7N✓uR� CVN m s V c y y C + 0 NI L MI N ^ �• i O /�JA' ..• 6 N qtr' T u t TqG {- 4. U l„ 1 CYMRY TC_N W LI C� nl V s w p m> c ^�L ry OL 6L N4 W1 O Vf= N✓>WPwO T`^ •-• 'D N C ... W L+ N C° �^ V 4 N C.L J •.. Y 6✓ A G N� ^^'S�N« NfCU N P °L 016CC VC� N O 4 Q1 C V C q d fyJ _ a L C ✓` t N � V O V •� QNUi L W YI ,„ C N i O V� N ^� L L V +NN V„ ' ` Dv .» WN c .. � `• v ✓.Y✓� O L V vii W L u . 'y 4 tJ •_ pxp u N LL A o b •r N " •L"'}- W O Y �., J) oC V C u O q `" CL. P u ..N..G'ITIC v1°.1 A NO C >v i. iw✓iA S�]I� ^1. .L.j �L Y 1. Y' L._ «y Q.°'o7�iv v R ^.F_VJryM CW L L L N WV 0 A u„ «✓YU ntl ° 'L .^ L 4. O fi Iu u°iY V.`_ ^rW+ 4. C •-• d O W J ^ VJi N w� y. ' ° N LL- L •_ A UO. P Y+. a � «vt ✓ u N „ N N E GiV'L UOA N A07Y q> ,+GY .q dVy >6NG C CO O� L Y CVI G °i q L N w G. �� C N'` O ^'.Q• W N V y O' u q l ^� °y' ; . G '.L- R.� � L: L L. L �' N« l 6 • ✓c. L LL' l nl b � �! L s ^ LL- 'V^ V C O V O C W O O L'_ L C [. N V G .n C u AbF u^ [IC tyy`gq 0��z 6 yL • Nye" ^V C.V . ^ q � V •^E V L r 6 L + N Y. LO � � V t ” V D � fbp W CW DVf c^ q W N N^ L Rq „, C`� d JFV i d f O:c ,:C V Wiyi n u u NNd7N✓uR� CVN m s V c y y C + q CN L L. La7df�_C CLn « �✓ i O .WLial.3 ru_.. Y ^LC ..• 6 N qtr' T u t TqG {- 4. U l„ ¢ CYMRY TC_N •LP 3'MN u G Y. H u Y N O u V u C V PC NY 7V6 U L C •.- G L. ' IY A L .rTj O W�✓nT�vba�i« mC^ V' 60 N� qE` .0 fJ FS LN.V WW yV VL V•JU _ G„ •-✓ ^dN'e �.qG. T)V✓ c VU1u�"" o ylqu V. a fA Qo 01 [tN Uiq _{V,/`4e� cc +C +UL 6y Op l.SL NL'.y OJ uu�� 46 OM i�'• YLG In0 434... Z�'NOn I I I I I b I LI C� nl V w p m> c ^�L ry OL 6L N4 W1 O Vf= N✓>WPwO T`^ •-• 'D N C ... W L+ N C° �^ V 4 N C.L J •.. Y 6✓ A G N� ^^'S�N« NfCU N P °L 016CC VC� N d _ a L C ✓` t N � V O V •� QNUi L W YI � L C N i O V� N ^� L L V +NN V„ ' C 6 Dv .» WN c .. � `• W° ], O L V vii W L •.T. °t! O + v tJ •_ pxp u N LL A o b •r N " •L"'}- W O Y �., J) oC V C u O q `" CL. P u ..N..G'ITIC v1°.1 A NO C >v i. iw✓iA S�]I� ^1. .L.j �L �'.°—.F�"c LiW �o q Q.°'o7�iv ^J]n L N «✓YU ::N C VO. L NMU d✓ l ON ••C• N u°iY V.`_ ^rW+ Nfl �^ +✓ � «vt ✓ u GiV'L UOA N A07Y q> ,+GY .q dVy >6NG C CO O� L Y CVI G °i q L N w G. �� C N'` O ^'.Q• W N V y O' ^� '.L- R.� � L: L L. L �' N« l 6 • ✓c. L LL' l nl b � �! L s ^ LL- 'V^ V C O V O C W O O L'_ L C [. N V G .n C u AbF u^ [IC tyy`gq 0��z 6 yL • Nye" ^V C.V . W C�'a✓gP q G2Lx y^ v a ✓"gC-li DVf c^ q W N N^ yQW, Rq „, C`� NL. .n. n pG, Wiyi NON 1. NNd7N✓uR� CVN + L CN Ir L. La7df�_C CLn .NV �✓ n6 .WLial.3 ru_.. Y ^LC yN1II WW TqG U� CYMRY TC_N ^�`q NN 3'MN �° NV" W C CLp Y` PC NY 7V6 U L C •.- ✓V W�✓nT�vba�i« mC^ V' 60 N� L✓ .0 fJ FS LN.V WW yV VL V•JU _ G„ •-✓ ^dN'e �.qG. T)V✓ c VU1u�"" o ylqu V. a fA Qo 01 [tN Uiq _{V,/`4e� cc +C +UL 6y Op LI C� 24 E Kn qv Pe Ja v%JM °• V �.:.E T ca✓ Y d^ Au "''uJNr °L .c9 LA Lei N o a ��o p u N L P •r •r UI d O' > m <f n✓ u n m ••• U O -•• W V +X W_ l.. W b '1 9 d Ld gV9r CW • uM {= YO nC I V rL + ✓f. WV O -V q Lup jru W CYgC� r N Ir ^UI N N S WY C b d LJ O•V Y c ✓ y N .tl .r nn WvQ «o O. u mow^ ✓.. 4 G n $�' G.r kQT u i n �q L '�d i'= u.r v. wo.`.YN '°°' L ✓TLpy � s N�✓.• J' � r L o Wa N .N. y r N a «/ cu ✓... LL' Lw•r 'c � � N L L c � �: n uL � ` yY v a bto qL ina al �L a:- yawTC w tJ o� t q• WNp TPC - p0• q: dl: LYl W �` ( O LYN W Vb YO' N N Y L'•� l•� 'O g O• N•G'' tl b gp l: W O � t] No. V ' N L. ... Ur r P P°,. C Q O^ C .� .N... V, •.G � V C q b la �.W W r.q w.oa: k c `TrN `n L-qc -�u.• Dm L r� cv -n J ^✓ N ..L. rnNy li p4 v .r- L � i n o w Y. w✓ � ✓ J � C (i yyG r w N A C y.r dCCmA d V u YS .� 4 T cS1I��1 N •.L-• w N O J V V •r O L U U+ L- N ry L. Y 9 r A N L W d O •I..•• 6r W v V ^ Nv Tf tI N Y C/ N^ L 1 T V �- W ^ UI 4J N f 4 (. �I ` L N a ••• N.r-• bA N M 6 V V Or G W G iV p dl VL N p Q NNnS N O( 4 V1TJy •'• U 1.• I{ �, Y. T ` L \ J O• VI CLS a N w C � 'J Y T C JJ N IT L P T « q � Or T ` N= n Cl •� C y P O 6' r G .� L V N (J. •--• 4 ••• O W r O C O .J C (l r N Y 9 Y VYL' d+ ^ w• O•+- 9 bnV NOC'r -•^ L Y' V L L O VWYV C a N C V y nN S ` y `.� ^ ^V qYr LLr r'W. • W•. N (L .- Lp •r Nr l:A J •�YL �Y N f. G « P P q••• P p+ O •^'^ m w .-rJ � •r C O n W« m r NLU J Y r E w w Na «q .-• N o a• Y 4 elv � y L r tJ •1' •' CJ „ 7 2 r N p � N r 1U •1 q j Y q G Y C �- y •r Y ^� O C Y C V-,r4 V C' l f]. <t V• y y 1: L n tL N V4 6' P U w C O ' a « L'•-+.•- 1��/l, ` rtl ¢C n [y� W N + N N / -' C O r t'/ y ` LG ~ •--• u N N n L !JI LO 4 O N t 4 q V Fi a � b +C V 1 .n � L+ F� !� ✓ 6 a O L• (] O •L. 6 P N w` Y O r •'-• V w G b glr•r w L N O Y O V V w L L L V O V V LV'• W Y ✓ N T` O' a N Ir 4 4^ N W J .Y ^r .0 n^ • P W p lJ L +• 4 u •. d y O N W L L ON SO : W O •� • 4 •.l [ LN ' N C O C w . T bW ` a 'V ^ V V V Z ? r V LL N q yJ •U u- E Er V L A L � Y ulL�i: _ T ur V L r 1' L N W« au.�« Y„ N N 1 Y b rn U 17 •n,• � N L 'O L •- N a r 6 r N ✓� IvN IL •n 4q o✓ b � ' P No V O1'. P W V••�by n-" C 4 N y` __ W u Ur u• r� 1Ja W ^ O ` „• wP Y rN • •- L � •" d V V � W C, r CYrL } J Z 1J .- < C O N Gr %•c mvD r �N� c v�i« A•} V N rou P rVY OV LY 4 q W 4 p+ 2 rw ^ •-• C W wo^ 1- N� ^- f`ps« Gn NV A � u 6 Y IV •`w M J r L pfr V •^ ILi yI VT Y h a0•Y 6A y L C N r L '( •' \ � > NE^ kU, IC n L J LO4`^ ^ q -u -' A ` uq � r it L N V T 61 4 O V M - q Au C U Iu E ^C LN r (' - O .b V •V O` N r ^ •� O V VI N L q {� N U 4 0 r C � C 9 C O •• u r n L V V r d V V Y_ OT`J LV .m 4 V r4.N CI r. Y9 0 ^ N V •� A r TVA O C r p L Y Y O �• iN N pf. p nL ^^J !. rr qL P N J Y N •' V ✓N G P^ T I. OI Y N O O 1+ C OIr V 7 O 0 V,. N C L Y A � • q'- � .. •,-' W N •D NT ✓ L ••- L 6� T•� r � r N .O � p •e ` y= VIOY 4VL O LL LL 6NUy J 4 V y .� `r W L •Ur r L It N V O �I V q f N vy L r- V d W N V N LI J rTyJ N ,.4.1 4 lt� O w aJ u- 4 V 4 V/ 4 N .- t'J N Q A P V b d N•• N_ C G] O U N Cr ..4• �I �I� 171 _ r a, m N_M fP W au C. C _It It q M 4 C P N. f U V V ••- L n s O C N V w J •.V- F r D n G N O L 'p r V 6 ^ .^ TJ w• N N r✓ } N r Y C � C V V r` N.O. 'WI r L (J . C A C U 1•.'l aJ V w Ur L r r J r � N � p b �r L A Y T u• V U V p4 _ ONPT L6 N NO CN a O.npOrV M r E q✓✓ r w1�N M �J L S^ U =1"IW V O ClU V N L O Y • p y T T pV O<JU L- V b V . y N✓ r u C O b ' n L N N '•J V C •� C V d y .0 9 �'•• f N 6 C M rdir V r y (1 \ J 4r V 4 Y Y b 11r N C J W N q N N l r^ ^ V u^ r N O• V V (' w N L \: V -•' u P✓ T O V C O P N r Y W C V C L (J 7 V -w• yr O � ✓ n r LL •�- ✓ L T- L "� G- L .• r� 6 0 r � auN Y O.' VVN YI IU W« ✓C C V J W+ w `:J. ^[ �� ^ }L..J Na LCr =�' .r w LN 2 r W i -.0 •'V' q •I� nr O O V rr N nLw -iJG�q W L. ✓ ev ✓ or« p., u>.}L`., alNq �iAY.I+ N ,u^ ✓ `c s La^ n^ .^ n Cr T .-u L V Y C V ••' V Y •N O O V /a i^ N �- Y-N C Y V a •r-. L G q V q V 1' L w W C C ✓„ L C y- J/aw UVVt N' 4 FOq Na(ly ][L NOW k~N0/ O Y EC JV b� a y`«nuL « O• N c pYN ^V LV F YY P.C9 U,VV a UI �VW u O• «N •L`J 'r K Vr y` ' L •C b fi Y W b '� � U V [: w G V Y .(JW + .O•/ Y •r N a rn N r- N i' .J• a Y k .� 6LN •�1. vqur `�I•Y GN 90NU = 6�Ir LC NCY. � LL'uM ^ L �, rs Off« iu Nr .`.-r NNU J-j, •�._ `Y-9 L...Y N O«JLaI L 049•^ d = -� pb•� L L uCi fY r C J bV O C N •.L• ^ VM, T «r O •ar•N-N YJ Ln C OW V(T .-- YyP CJ W p ^ J OiTU (: VA C yO V. „UC Y1 C g OIr V .=i J •r> taia NV qr O�iPq Nom• O V ` AJJ pL SE NV aV,9•r•s ry9 00 -•J� Y� N L✓ W rN O V�� n „LLLV IL 6C.L� >r E n d� 00 Y O•�qO •Q p..• vrtl NYp[P a• -..C- C..V Ct Or N'O u V yA E' N E NO• W C VIN✓V.w. L ` C. N .• W C'1 •y y C ^ 11r V ✓ N « C ^ L � C •� 4 L S C V V ..• N P V� a 4 r r V C Y CI I�M ..0.4.OG ^'L •t rL�J VCWfP ^I LLuq Vr� Y j y« +•, uu' nN VOO - TON NrVq 7 f+•^6 'JCT•� wi V i • (• f. 1. (' 11 <. n'•' .Y• O C S •r q O •r P O q ' IJ n W C O •� INJ •C^ VLL 6 tj wJ u W •.K- r 6 N + 0 L OY N Yru L' 'J .”- ry u 4C S N b ✓ Ny q .' N "' W U ^ U� u W p I L L (/ V ^, K N r C C• 1 _T J N y C � ^ 1• LL C` V n 01 O l C O W V r Y O C S Y Y„•q• .0 A N t: A VO• L y+ V 6 •'/ a :l n C '^ J OwN y:N- 44' ^ 02'LyC Lw-G N C'v>^ VO VTJ TE VYU.LS• .a/ N�� SE ^•r �� }NNTU•� qYN 2Y> ��./O k ^v4 W r N O E� qA'••6 Vq1 ny NA IYNa Wf q 50 yNwc NLCJV . N.�V N 4 yC -•n.•• .�qR V • Tv 'OG ^.nWq 'U o M C4V'N 4 F C. ✓ W G U1N (r U ' u •✓ aCi LI V uii L E E m V u + •,O-f V .. N 9•r •••,•• L .. NI ✓ E UWVN C/ ¢ Y C r •J +J CNJr + A L(L� =L-NNn C G O'^ A U r N O'er K ^iiL V H V ✓ uLL C C N� •r �1.• .. 41 L U d V L V Y (Y •^N C. O• •_ ]. } J•J O, n C•nN 1J "'•r ury LkV !O 4 � Ni N„ tV V � J Y LCi+JC CY✓ W CV C�j Y. Jr L`' k bC PICJI � NC1YV OY TiW OpNtJ C% �[J •u^ 'V O P 6' %rI V Tl A L�YJ Ll W Y � P T.J y aL f] .:J L N(J TL Ot• l 4n q N'^\JG V O4.ur A L r.` T6 NOCU ^ U 2+ •r = OOL M OM -T VT LSVbC�O J C gOOd •r Lrr L�r� -.� dl OWV•"•V al W r�� N V t L V ✓ NM NV P NgUd NJ V L 6 ^pd YY }r �L^J CtI i1 �I 6OgkS C +�7 •• 4 6NN4• O.OVLC {5 0.VVLV GV 4•lO GV WN W� ./ ✓LyVJJ �" 1••LJV ./1 1- V�AO a > y N ry V n r N C'1 1� � u V 1 ry 6 w p N O d W W W 1 -o is LW w Or O Y N u n L N � 4 v`I«L Y ^ W N I O V t Ci Cy Wcq Y i[ Y U wl V_ n 'U y Y 7 y N L Y O O C u V N O > n V•Y N b a L a �a n. L V � N O u r C �^ U ` 1] v Lo 0 W C Lo G, b MV a c Jr N V l a V = u T' L L i 6 q C s L w L O N N L N C T pr Y w y V �u W 6 7C C C 1: O Y V J T N p C y y w l P O l' !ryry] V ty m 4 v T V u a V W c N O C y V C P N 4! c V L L V V t a T L N W W � L u W L Q k -- C C y u V NW nP dI G. G /I ]i v b u L 4 N u n. N � Y Y 6 a m (1 U L � L L JG w X m ;w L O t N O N N mt W 1" r0 T /y'1 O C V N V L R L L k V u W N� n_ u L V LL C W o W LN N P L W V L �A N L- q V d C F N♦ L C y N V Vr � R ^ ^ _ W N V Or Y 2�c N 'tl .n 'n a c i w 4 V W ^ N L c s b W T b Y N L u y u O'p L 6 L n "• v ii a nr C O �L U � ^ N ✓ b N r` N O J "♦ �yV Y L vW Y v M !✓ 5 N N N N � grrL �✓ GVi w n L N S y r V l] C N O 7 ✓ V w c C L u m „V lur b O f ♦J V L V O nl v � �iuOV d P L C P O f q W L C O •- W •r' V LI ^ L 4 N V .Ni• v O a O q i T g t j♦� Y♦. N w C O.N �.N d W N 'CON ✓y f V t ON � V V i y •-• ♦, L p� w p N O d W W W 1 -o is LW w Or O Y N u n L N � 4 v`I«L Y ^ W N I O V t Ci Cy Wcq Y i[ Y U wl V_ n 'U y Y 7 y N L Y O O C u V N O > n V•Y N b a L a �a n. L V � N O u r C �^ U ` 1] v Lo 0 W C Lo G, b MV a c Jr N V l a V = u T' L L i 6 q C s L w L O N N L N C T pr Y w y V �u W 6 7C C C 1: O Y V J T N p C y y w l P O l' !ryry] V ty m 4 v T V u a V W c N O C y V C P N 4! c V L L V V t a T L N W W � L u W L Q k -- C C y u V NW nP dI G. G /I ]i v b u L 4 N u n. N � Y Y 6 a m (1 U L � L L JG w X m ;w L O t N O N N mt W 1" r0 T /y'1 O C V N V L R L L k V u W N� n_ u L V LL C W o W LN N P L W V L �A N L- q V d C F N♦ L C y N V Vr � R ^ ^ _ W N V Or Y 2�c N 'tl .n 'n a c i w 4 V W ^ N L c s b u O'p L ✓ n i o O L � L r _LLT •n bN M _ V viN N N rir � �✓ GVi w n L N S y di (J .U•.'�U rr ... ♦r_ O a ✓L 'CON ✓y f V t ON NLL V V i y •-• ♦, L p� Y.YV TJN r..J N:L AO U.yn NN"' C Vt� ACIV/r Oup C♦' "V rn]b n.� O V "' i C V ^• V W L V �` ^I �• Vl L pA b L } C (1V q I U L�{1 _ C "T 4. NN ✓ L nrb _ un V N V N V L W N r O V V yr q C c ^ W c b f� u u.Lr N [ v_u V N 4 ^ Q T x ro C u C rn C y c' v C' W 0 E C 0 V. W ✓ O u y G" C V•� N � W V J co 3 % I ty / 7 r� .Y W l'] O W L' s N �y L i Ii L N y rn.L- L' P k W ^ T W V f r W u.7 T� o U+ y is a �L nr Y L L a m O W u q N c. c N O u V V L ] O u L Y 0 PlV C W W it N vvo N V � � NLLC u CI P N ily N (L N V y9/ L u N N C LLY.Y N w ^ BEY V104r{ w N V Y 1. q 2= o y � LNi u 'v in N " ♦L]r � T L •' V �♦ W C �bOrru N ✓ 4 l •r w b w N y T O 1p p N l: A L V � b L N N w C V L W l r �V L V W Nr v Y y q !] !' Y W N O u O V [i V L NV L L i U V•W i✓ N i p•� C '^ V N 7 N Cl O V L C u s C �. O W ^ N C V v N r NY G V N � P yr l T 3� '^ V 7 L re J 0 a s J yuy L UY +ILL p N V S: C1Q W w 7T o� � VrC N N W N p i• IL_ W L C u l W L N V L n N °' V u u Lm b c ar`. } pr Q V L L O.V P^ -7 W V LI rMa O N V IL W yr O O •N s n A � V 4 ^. V L y NZo O c✓ 1N L N L 4 r L W y � �C W 6 Y V C U L 4r Y bi C W L ^ L � w VIL O m r°i u c N k u W = rn L O C r Y. 1I L u w i m ✓ W u « N V v a L b uc L C "L'• fj S N y •Ll• u W � P V 4 P W O C O q V 4 i W L W a 4 . L L N L L q o: N u N T L u t: `cr u W• L N C rr 'tl O � C V 2 q V N V L' y G: L 4 _ W q i C d LLu L N L u n� W c ` (v OY O > N N r.j Q N L q N c N N L o-' v qc N ?' OI W \✓ T V V A V y W V- u Y_ m c L l 7 �w L O. M W n N U V ^ ui u u u L Q C C O V V C r u q L y L y.r L oY L L O O N J V C C ]iuO N l y = V V L R u b O V V V N O y q PV L, W L L RVV ��gLlo L N W L p O �� ✓Ly V V Vy ^ZV PNC"y`s N N r W Y V 4M 1 Jf � PI i 0 A Y 9 o w add V L U V W Orp.V iJ bl4! O� C w q r N N u LS b q yT fi N c v b .+ V b V u L IT O L le IZ u NtJ W 6 girt J 6 «a O ✓ c i c t Loc 4.^ L W PLN� .O >I b N l q c0 ✓ i V L O O 5 u 2 n •tin. q- V 4- V (rS N W V O + L N y q W N >fLj C Y C C A ✓ c u q T l q d + L L C ~• LL�Q 4 L / I O W v N .P `I A L r_c1 b o fi uyy 4. 1' L G p 4 IX •q L �Id X: c A V J u L o n Y G O 7 A 7 a o LL C 5' ^ C u L T W L Tl. l:A N .t'm VO 11 11 Ln ry U � U N W L ✓ Vt- _ _ « C [ U b LLl:„ •71 V f CVIJ C N �u q N O.T/Y V UUA V V W ^ii q Yt + •L L Y L 4 « 1 Y Lt n 1" u b a« a L O ✓ � ` V W rrrppplll��' ¢ 11 N L N ✓ Y U W + L✓ Y Yt r✓ qiT p u l4 W q d N V L._y� `TN V-O •J O 6V ON T ,[ W4-rV •� O Y u V C K •^' 1 N V N •^ N V A ✓^ C N O t N u vc •N q j V Y! y V O O y UM O V'1 N a •� -�6�4 :74: auA. y cJu uu >o _.OV .tV CC +uN u4-. -� A me J�u �i�P� W ---• cA vc «y � C A C O 4 W ._ n: W✓ ._ C C JL�+ Kq✓q LL4 4O. fi Jl -u 4.� N M N VI 10 A Ln Southern California Edison Company v. o. ncx 61, 1 xc1 e:. F'Rnw els 6Tw ecr ONTARIO. Cl,L1F0RN1n 41761 October 21, 1981 Community Development Department Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 793 Cucamonga, CA 91.730 ATTENTION: Mr. Michael Vairin Senior Planner ��a r` W E. L' CAMJD"EP EOMMUNIrl'Y UEV[LOPMENT g�g�lUillil2�1 5 Gentlemen: Attached is a report that contains the results of a survey conducted on alternative sites located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the proposed elet•trical Substation. We have also provided additional information regarding a economic impact upon residential properties adjacent to sub- station facilities. We hope this information, along with the original comprehensive studies presented, at the August 12, 1.981, public hearing, will. be sufficient data for the Planning Com- mission to make a favorable decision. ! Very truly yours, R. R. Verrue, RRV:cd Attachment G ALTA LOMA ALTERNATE SUBSITES We investigated the availability of four alternate substation si -.es for the proposed Alta Loma Substation. Our investigation revealed that none of the four sites are available. Site No. 1 is a level site containing approximately 4.07 acres planted in citrus and is located on the east side of Archibald and north of Lemon. The owner stated that the property was not for sale. Site No. 2 is also a level lot containing 6„09 acres planted in citrus. The lot is located on the northwest corner of Lemon and .Archibald. The owner stated the parcel is ready for development and a tentative tract map is being processed for regulatory approvals. The parcel is not for sale. Site No. 3 is located on the east side of Amethyst Street south of Banyan. This property is also being developed and a tentative tract map has been prepared. The property is not for sale. Site No. q is located at the Banyan and Hellman Streets. The 5.86 acre parcel is planted in citrus and has a single story residence located approximately 330 feet north of Banyan Street. The owner stated the property was not for sale. II USER II4PACTS The Right of Way and Land Department, Appraisal Section, completed. an additional study regarding the economic effect of substation facilities on surrounding residential property values. Questionnaires were mailed to nine residents, whose property is adjacent to the Shanlin Substation, San Bernardino. Four pro- perty owners responded (44.4% return). The responses that were re -dived from these residential property owners are summarized as _ Iows: 1. The proximity of the substation did not affect their decision to purchase the home. 2. Three of the four responses were very complimentary of the landscaping an" )keep of the substation property. 3. Three of the four responses stated that the substation did not affect their daily living in any way. 4. All property owners answered that they did not exper- ience any noise or television interference from the adjacent substation. All of the respondents stated thi_ Ar property values have increased since they moved into t::. homes. The price range of the homes are estimated to be approximately $75,000 to $73,000. I1. Il ECONOMIC As was indicated in the original site studies of the proposed Alta Loma Substation, every effort is made to acquire a piece of property that is situated as near the load center as possible for both present and future growth. If this does not occur, voltage loss results in the deterioration of adequate electric service to the customer's facilties. This low voltage condition also has a great impact on the Southern. California Edison Company both in expense and customer relations. Another important site selection criteria is that electrical overhead facilities exist along the streets so that overhead construction and line extension costs can be kept at a rea expense. sonable The area n/o Banyan and w/o Hellman Streets would require exten- sive overhead line construction as little or no overhead electri- cal facilities exist. It is necessary to provide two electrical transmission lines into a substation for the .reliability and protection of electrical service for our customers. To summarize the Company's findings on the economic impact upon is surrounding residential property values, we feel that there is no adverse impart on the value of homes adjacent to substation faci�ities. This was verified by the studies conducted for the South Substation and Parkwood Substation. Tne survey that was recently conducted on the nine properties adjacent to the Shandin Substation in San Bernardino also support this finding. 0 11 L �J July 2T, 1981 L. G. P'RUTSOS SPECIAL SERVICES SUB,TECT: Alta Loma. 8uLsration Site City of Rancho Cucamonga In accordance with your request of July 1, 1981, Right oR cTay and Land Department, Appraisal Section, has completed a study regarding the economic effect of substation facilities on surrounding residential property values. The study included two (2) substations, south Substation (220 kV) in Cerritos and Parkwood Substation (66 kV) in La. Habra. The following is a summary of Our findings- South Substation Locations Northeast corner of Del Amo Boulevard and Studebaker Road in the city of Cerritos. Size: The substation and rights of ways encompass: approximately 334• acres: Adjacent to and north of the substation Is a 131 lot single family residential subdivision, Tract No_ 24011. The tract was filed and constructed- during 1968. Currently, homes in this tract range in value from $125,000 to $136,500, depending on size and amenities. The tract is very, well maintained and snows pride of ownership. Based on conversations with repre- sentatives of Golden West Realtors, Real Estate Specialists and Tiffany Real Estate, homes in this tract usually sell in a reasonable time, with. no regards to their proximity to the substation. In order to substantiate these opinions, an analysis was made of sales over a two -year period_ The sales relied. upon took place between July 1979 and July 1981. In our opinion, these sales indicate the attitudes of typical buyers. As a result of our findings, the substation and related rights of ways have no adverse effect on the value of the real estate in this area. Parkwood Substation Location_ Approximately 3C of section of Imperia zity of La Habra. a mile southwest of the inter - 1 Highway and Idaho Street, Sizez The substation contains approximately 24- acres. -2- .ent to and east of the substation is a new single - family +c. !ential subdivision, the first phase of which was completed j++ years ago. sales representatives of Classic Hones +: dopers) explained that only three homes are available that *� iew and not resales. One home has a direct view of the ++a ration and is difficult to sell_ Presently, there is no I•�++ ;taping blocking this vier_ 4z' the homes adjacent to the station were among the first `I+'• 'the owners have indicated m noise or T.V. and radio Terence_ The sales representatives explained that if the on was properly landscaped, they would not have enccuntered Afficraty in selling the remaining homes. mmarize our Findings, we feel that there is no adverse ` t on the value of homes adjacent to substation facilities. proper landscaping, the stations can be made to blend into +.ghborhood. �I -up material for this study will he available at the public ping August 12, 1981, and Mr. DeNatale, R/W 8 Land, Appraisal will be in attendance to answer any questions. A.- C. TA"A RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND DE:ARTMENT . CDuarte,- ldd CC,. R_ R. Verrue R. W. Bond J. L. Renner D. W_ Salley n 5,g bcrhood, the Design Review Committee should be t _ etermining factor. thought that a 2 -story would b le to put in but maybe some o design would work and it d be brought back. Motion: Moved by Remped by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution N -86, the stipulation that the unit be redesigned in st a way as to mitig the concerns of the Planning Commiss io that this be brought back _t- e Design Review Committee for aiarrfbval. E. ENVTP.ONMENT_AL ASSESS".W: T A::D CONDITIONAL USE 7ERMEIT NO. 81 -05 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANv - The development of an electrical distribution substation located on 4.78 acres of land in the R -1 -20 zone, located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Wilson Avenue - APL] 1061- 571 -04. Mr. Lam advised that this item had been continued from a previous meeting in order for the applicant to provide additional information to the Commission. Further, that Mr. Dick Verrue, District Manager. of Southern California Edison Company, would present that informa- tion. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Verrue stated that there had been several questions raised at the prior meeting and that expert witnesses were not available at that time. Mr. Verruc introduced Mr. Jim DuBois, an engineer with the technical support group, to speak to the sound and noise; Mr. G. Cling with Bob Langston, architect and designer; Mr. Bill Blinger, telecommunications; Mr. Norm Cooch, attorney; and Mr. DiNatele, of the land appraisal divi- sion. Mr. Verrue indicated that these people would be able to answer any questions the Commission might have. Mr. Verrue spoke of the site selection, noise interference, and visual impact and explained how electricity was transmitted in this area. lie provided background on how a determination is made that the area cannot be served due to growth. Mr. Verrue described the site selection of this particular plant pro- viding the factors which entered into the selection process for the substation. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that in relationship to site No.. 2, he could not imagine that the County Flood Control District would be un- willing to release land for a site. Mr. Verrue replied that where were other impacts such as getting lines in and out of Site No. 2. He indiated that because of the physical characteristics of the site, it would be difficult to get lines across Hillside. Planning Commission Minutes -4- August 12, 1.981 C C Co-mmissioner Tolstoy stated that this both does and does not satisfy him. Further, that he would like to have Mr. Verrue provide him with information from the horses mouth rather than from some staff member at the Flood Control District that is not 100 percent sure. He further stated that he realized thac is would be to Edison's advantage econom- ically to use existing facilities but, as a Commission member, he felt that there should be some pursuance of that. Mr. Verrue stated that site No. 2 is a little further north - ::e than what Commissioner Tolstoy realized. Commissioner Tolstoy asked where the load center is and if it was at Archibald. Mr. Verrue replied that it was not and that it would actually be at item No. 3. Commissioner Tolstoy asked where the north -south load center is. Mr. Verrue replied that ?.t was at 19th north -south and east -west it would be Hermosa over to -he Flood Control. Further, that the load center is presently west of Hermosa. Commissioner Tolstoy asked, in Southern Caltfornia Edison's forecast of Rancho Cucamonga and now that the General Plan is approved, where the load center will be? Mr. Verrue replied that it would presently be at site No. 1 and in 10 -15 years, east of Chaffey College. Chairman King asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition to this project. Mr. John Mannerino, attorney representing Mssrs. Tessier and partners who are landowners adjacent to this site, expressed extreme opposition on their behalf to this project. He stated that he noted Mr. Verrue had said that almost all sound levels will have been mitigated; however, these were the maximum sound levels as set forth in the County of San Bernardino Ordinance and felt that Edison had side stepped the issue of presenting the facts. He thought that as the City's Planning Commission they had the right to request an EIR and thought that since there is a representation of property owners who would be affected by this sub- station, they would like the EIR completed prior to the Commission making a decision. Commissioner Sceranka asked if the intimation is that an economic EIR. is what they are taiking about. Mr. Mannerino replied yes, because ultimately all the interferences, whether they arc noise or others, will translate into economics. His clients, he stated, are interested in the economic impacts as they would translate into property values. Planning Commission Minutes -5- August 12, 1981 Mr. Hank Bouchett, 5605 Archibald Avenue, asked about the voltage srvp of 6.7 per mile. He stated that he was confused about the site selection and did not get adequate information. He further asked if the houses that Mr. Verrue mentioned had been sold in LaHabra were of equal value, disregarding the cost. Commissioner Sceranka asked the applicant about site No. 2 and what the effect of selecting Site No. 2 was. He was asked to make a comparison. Mr. Verrue replied that it is further north and further away from the load center. Additioually, the Flood Control District would not give a blanket release of easements. Iie felt that it would be economically infeasible to do something with it. Commissioi :_ °r Sceranka asked if the Demens Channel was done and if there was no possibility that they would be able to get some fill from it. He also asked Mr. Rougeau if the Flood Control District would give a re- lease of their easements. Mr. Rougeau replied that the Flood Control District is reluctant to give up its easements. Commissioner Tolstoy commented 'hat the Flood Control. District is ten- acious. Once they have property, they rlvu'c like to give it up. There• being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel stated that there is nowhere in the City north of Foothill that putting in a substation would have anything but an adverse effect on the residential community. Further, that there may be no residences in the area at the time but there will be future residences. He stated that when it comes to the final decision, that is the way the Commission will have to look at it. Commissioner Dahl asked for his edification how many people were here because of this issue. About one -half of the audience, or about 20 people raised their hands. Ile stated that in looking at this, he could not heln but see that a location is needed and that Edison needs to come info thib area but he was having some problem with the reason that Edison had cbos-�n site Nv. 1 versus 2 and 3. He indicated that cost should be examined and that he wanted to look out for the public and Edison's interest. He thought that the attorney for the land owners made a good statement and stated that he would like an economic impact report before making his decision. He stated that he could not support this tonight and would like to have an EIR. He further stated that he had asked Edison previously to do .ome research on possible other locations but had not seen this done. Further, that it was not stated that there were no new sites. Planning Commission Minutes -6- August 12, 1981 Chairman King stated that if the Commission feels that an EIR is needed, that is fine. He further stated that he has sat through two public hearings on this substation and he personally did not feel that the location of this project is appropriate. Chairman King stated that he had a problem with aesthetics and the safety in a single - family residential area. He felt that at build out it may change where this should be. He stated ti:at personally he did not feel that he would be in favor of this project. 8:10 p.m. The Pl.anrel.ng Commission recessed. 8:20 p.m. The Flanriu�, Commission reconvened. Commissioner Sceranka stated that this issue is caught up on whether there arc other appropriate ;:ices i.n the City or whether there are other sites in the City that will have less impact if the substation i.s bu';.t there. Further, in order to determine a solution to this, Edison's statements uZ -ices A or B and 1 and 2 will not do the job. Commissioner Sceranka stated that we will have to take a look at the available sites within the City and set up criteria of major points. He asked that a study be done by an independent consultant or by some- one deemed acceptable by the Commission to come back to the Commission with: 1. The economic impact on the sites that are available. 2. Adjacent user impacts in terms of who is next door to the user and whether the site impact is significant. 3. Feasibility of putting the facility there at all from a practical standpoint of whether they can put the facility in a flood control: zone or whatever. He said he is open to suggestions from the Commission as to who should make the study. Commissioner Dahl stated that if we are to do this and this is recommended by the Commission, he would like to ash staff if possible to have such a study which will be underwritten by Lice Edison Company. Mr. Lain stated that if sued a study is done, it would have to be under- written by Edison. He stated further that if they v ch to pursue the application, the Commission could 'request that as a. condition of carry - in on with the project, they have this study done. Mr. Lam stated that what the Commission should do is set the scope of what the study should determine. 0 Planning Commission minutes -7- Augost 12, 1981 • Co=. issioner Dahl asked Conunissioner Sceranka if he wished to make a motion of those points he wanted covered in the study. Commissioner Sceranka replied that first a determination should be made of who will do the study. Commissioner Sceranka moved that such a study be done, but felt the motion was incomplete without stating; who would do the study. Mr. Lam stated that what the Commission must do is set the scope of what the study should determine and if Edison will do the study, all right. Otherwise, staff will have to do a request for proposal. Ile stated that the planning Commission should carefully consider whether they have finalized all these concerns. The reason was:, he said, that if you say points A, B and C, and later on, it would only be fair to the applicant to specifically define all the areas that should be discovered. Commissioner Dahl stated that one of the things that had been stated is that this study should be without regard to options, A or B, 1, 2, 3 or 4 and that there be research to other possible sites throughout the area that would be of service to the area concerned. He indicated that this list should not just be a choice of the ones that have been presented here. Further, that Edison has previously been requested to look at alternative sites and report back to the Commission and that there really has been no change. Chairman King stated that he would agree that what Commissioner Sceranka. says has to be done, but rather than having Edison pay for an outside consultant, felt that the Edison Company should do the study. It appeared to him that the information that they had provided to the Commission thus far is accurate and that they have the capability to do this kind of study in house. Commissioner Sceranka added to his motion that the Edison Company would do the study and restated his three concerns. Commissioner Dahl seconded the motion and Chairman King called for the question. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, DAHL, TOLSTOY, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NO %E - carried- Mr. Lam stated that he had been asked during the recess if any decision made at this meeting tonight could he appealed to the City Council. He indicated to whoever had asked the question, that the answer is yes, within 14 days of the Planning Commission decision. Planning Commission Minutes -8- August 12, 1981 •p. PUBLIC HEARINGS r A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. bt) -OS - 'S—ouTyEmi CALIFORNIA LDISON COt•IPANY - The development of an electri- cal distribution substation on the northwest corner of Archibald and Wilson Avenue. APN 1061- 571 -04. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Dahl opened the public hearing. Mr. Randy Bond, area manager for the Southern California Edison Company, the applicant, introduced Mr. Jim Renner, Substation Transmission Engineer- ing Department; and Mr. Don Bailey, Community Services Department. He thanked staff for the cooperation they have provided over the past few months as the Edison Company has tried to work on this. Mr. Bond stated that the primary reason for the needed substation is the area's growth. He listed the six sites that the Edison Company had explored and stated that they held a meeting on June 9 with residents to answer questions and concerns regarding the site that was chosen. Mr. Bond explained the need for more electrical power, when the substation would go on line, and asked for the Conditional Use Permit to be granted. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if the ambient noise level was measured with or without the screening that would be provided by landscaping. Mr. Renner replied that it was measured with screening. Commissioner Tolstoy asked about television interference and the effect a 66 KV line would have on reception. Mr. Bond stated that there should not be a detrimental effect to TV reception. However, Mr. Bond stated that these might be ghosts as a result of the transmission line being between the substation and the mountain. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if Edison dusts off their insulators. Mr. Bon replied that they do. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how the 66 rV transmission lines are brought in. Mr. Bond replied that they have a substation and explained 'the route they would follow present lines. transmission line in the Archibald that would be used indicating that Commissioner Tolstoy asked if Edison builds a more low profile plant that what is projected for this substation. Planning Commission Minutes -3- June 24, 1981 u Mr. Bond replied that this is about as low as it can go. IDCommissioner Sceranka asked what is adjacent to the proposed boundary. Mr. Bond replied that they have acquired 5.5 acres and will use approximately 2.5 of the land with no further plans for the additional land. He hoped that whoever develops to the north would incorporate this land into their plan. He indicated that they are not in the land development business and are willing to sell the excess property to someone else. Chairman Dahl asked what the phasing will be from the time of landscaping to the time of building. Mr. Bond replied that it may be as far away as 1985 before they proceed but they are considering landscaping and building a wall to get a little more height to ehe landscaping before the guts of the plant go in. Mr.. Bond stated that this plant has not yet been approved in their budget so he dial not know the exact time schedule for building. Commissioner King asked if there was any other way the substation could be laid out on the site that might mitigate the view for the residents who li•ie on the north side. Mr. Bond replied that he did not think so because the 66 KV portion is next to Wilson, followed by the transformer, and secondary voltage. He indicated that the driveway could be located next to Wilson but that it would not accomplish much. Mr. Renner stated that he had worked two months on this to get what was their standard design.. Commissioner Sceranka stated that there wasn't any record of setback requirements for residences adjacent to a substation and further. asked if there would be any problems on the perimeter. Mr. Bond replied that the lots in Cerritos back onto the substation and that there is a chain link fence. Ile indicated that what Edison is doing here is providing better treatment than they usually give to this kind of substation. Commissioner King asked if the complex were moved northerly, would that mitigate the view into the substation. Mr. Renner replied that he did not think it would help. Chairman Dahl asked if there was anyone who wished to speak for this project. No one spoke. Chairman Dahl asked if anyone wished to speak agalnst this project. Planning Commission Minutes -4- June 24, 1981 Mr. John Mannerino, 9330 Base Line, Suite 100, Rancho Cucamonga, repre- senting Norman and Don Tessier and John Koskowski, strongly advised against the development of this property as a substation. He indicated that development should not be allowed to take place because this is residential property and the property owners he represents do not feel. that there are compelling reasons for locating the substation here. He indicated that his client's property would be reduced in value substan- tially as single family land were this to go in. He asked that this project be denied. Mrs. Gail Dyke, 9717 Peachtree Lane, stated that she .looks out at cows grazing and knows that it can't last, but did not feel this substation should be put into a residential area. She indicated that property values would decrease and stated that she did not wish to see this project in this area. Mr. Bruce Talbot, 5656 Klusman, was opposed because of the transmission wires and poles that would be required fronting Wilson Avenue. He indicated that there would be no way to underground the wires because of the beat and power that would be carried. He felt that a substation should be considered for another area. Mr. Shaw, 5665 Klusman, opposed this project because of its prono:;ed location in a residential. area. He indicated that the Planning Commission is supposed to be supported by tax money and he did not know why the Southern California Edison Company can come into Cicy offices and have their project approved and not come to the residents and inform them ahead of time. lie .felt that there was injustice to the taxpayers. Chairman Dahl replied that the Planning Commission is a group of citizens appointed by the City Council and that they are not on the payroll of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Purther, that until hearing everything related to this project he does not know how he will vote and that he, at this point, is unprejudiced. Mr. Shaw indi.catcd that he was saying that Edison went into the Planning office and came out with approval to purchase the property. He stated that they were supposed to notify people within a 300foot radius and he was not notified although he was within the notification area. Mr. Vairin explained that Mr. Shaw was not notified because he had purchased his property after the current assessor's rolls were published and a :s therefore not listed as the current owner. Chairman Dahl stated that staff could not get to each home in the area and further explained the notification procedure. Mr. Hogan stated that the issue was not one of notification because the Edison Company held a meeting on this and invited all property owners in the area to attend. Further, the Edison Company can go out and buy all the land that they want. He indicated that Mr. Shaw had accused the Planning Commission Minutes -5- June 24, 1981 C � the City of colusion and he had no prediction of what the outcome will be in what is at issue here. IsMr. H.C. Burchette, 6605 Archibald, was opposed because of television interference, stating that Edison was nut qualified to answer electronic questions; the selection of the site and the intimation that if this project was not approved, Edison has the power of eminent domain. 8:00 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:15 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. Chairman Dahl asked for a show of hands from the people opposed to this project. Approximately 25 persons in the audience raised their hands. Mr. Randy Bond provided further background information on site selection and the reasons for the proposed location. He explained when the option on this land was taken and the questions that were answered by the City staff relative to zoning requirements. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Bond to explain what he meant by stating the City said this was a usable site. Mr. Bond explained that he made reference to the zoning aspect of the site. M7. Vairin stated that staff's input to the Edison Company was relative to this being a conditional use and not an existing use. Further, that staff had always stated that the Planning Commission would make a final determination on whether the project could be located at the chosen site and that no promises were made. Mr. Vairin stated that Edison does have condemnation rights and in very rare instances uses them to condemn property. He indicated, however, that they are still waiting for the Planning Commission to say whether the property can be used. Mr.. Bond showed a voltage drop chart to the Planning Commission explaining what happens to electricity when it goes beyond the optimum area for transmission. Commissioner King asked what safeguards there are relative to keeping children from going over the fence into a high voltage area and what warnings would exist. Mr. Bond explained that there would be a block wall enclosing the facility with a locked gate and visible signs warning of high voltage. He indicated that there is usually not a problem. Planning Commission Minutes 10 June 24, 1981 C Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to continue this to August 12, 1981 in order that the Ediscn Company can provide more information to the Commission relative to the issues raised. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would also like to see what the economic impacts would be of relocating the site. He agreed with the residents that this is not a good site and reiterated that he would like to know what the impacts would be. Chai.rmar. Dahl asked Mr. Vairi_n what a conditional use permit for this site really means. Mr. Vairin explained that granting use would be conditia::ed upor. mitigating the problems that would be created by this project's location. He indicated that tti(-- kind of inform�at on the Commission is askin ab ut would a �r une a -ocused GIit. He further indicated _ � *ham -E- the most effective mechanism o ri in a ec on makers those ,ues nee to a disc - sioner that this is the issue rig t now. He indicated that the Planning Commission needr to study site selection Commissioner King asked for clarification of the motion. Q) 7 Commissioner Tolstoy restated the motion indicating that the Commission's decision will be pur,.Off until Edison Provide more information on property aele jog- He furs er sated that there may be more Lonna .on ou better sites. Commissioner Sceranka asked people in the audience to write to the Commission if there were other points of information that they would like to know about. B. E 14ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP N0. 6596 - A & t11PMENT_ - An induct subdivision of 4.08 acres of land o 2 parcels within the M -2 z located on the northwe orner of San Bernardino Road and Lucas Ranch 3LUa 1. APN 210- - 0. Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil En p r, .ewed the staff report. Commissioner. Sccrank sked about the A.C. paving; Condition No. 8 and whether a lien - _eement will be required on San Bern, '.no Avenue. Mr. Ho_ - i replied that it should be Fourth Street and not San and that they did not want to perpetuate that name. le Planning Commission Minutes -8- June 24, 1981 Commissioner Kin;, asked if Mr. Bond thought there might be more problems with the dangers of children getting into the substation in a residential area as opposed to a non - residential area. Mr. Renner replied by stating that be did riot foresee a problem as this is governed by the Public Utilities Commission and all requirements mandated by the Commission must be observed. He indicated that the wall must be eight feet high and would have barbed wire on top of it which would be an obstruction to getting to the substation. He also spoke of a ground -fault system that would prevent shocks. Commissioner Sceranka stated that it is important that whenever major projects are considered that the Commission look at trade -offs. Further, that he was not sure that he fully understands the impacts of Edison moving the substation to another location about a quarter -mile away. Commissioner Sceranka askew for information from Edison on alternative sites and what effect moving the site would have on the overall power services to the City. Ile stated that he was not inclined to think about increased services to the Citv but did not wz�.t to make a decision to- night. lie asked again that Edison provide alternative sites for review. Chairman Dahl stated .hat there are two things that must be addressed: one, whether she Conditional Use Permit should be allowed and the other, the environmental impact. ct Chairman Dahl stated that he was n e what the EIR would be. lie ar rstenc" 7c to the homeowner who stated that the enviro mpact would be great and then Edison who stated that it would be minimal.. He indicated that looking at the map that was furnished by Edison, the proposed station has the highest overlap of any of the other substations. He stated that he would like more comments from the Planning Commission before he makes a decisioc. he was not sure whether an EIR is needed. He indicated he had no objection to continuo —int -; Erns item until everyone is comfortable. lie stated that he had heard input from both sides and on the basis of what he heard pursuant to safety and aesthetic factors, his inclination would be to vote against it. He indicated that he would be willing to go along with a request for more study to become better acquainted with this project. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he felt the major issue has been brought up relative to .land value and sight problems and radio and TV problems and whether the site selection was right or wrong. He stated further that when he listens to both sides he tries to mitigate the issues and he found that he has a problem with the infor-maLion that he presently has. He agreed with Commissioner Sceranka and felt. that what is really needed is to allow the Edison Company, in light of the opposition, to bring in more information about the property selection. Planning Commission Minutes -7- June 24, 1981 August 12, 1981 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1977 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, Director of Community Development BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUB•IECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Nil. 81- SOUTHERiJ CA[.IFORNIA EDISON COMPANY - The development of an electrical distribution substation located on 4.78 acres of land in the R- 1- 20,000 zone located on the northwest corner cf Archibald Avenue and Wilson Avenue - APN 1061- 571 -04 ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission continued the public hearing on this item at its meeting of June 24, 1981 to allow the applicant time to provide additional information regarding potential impacts of the project or the surrounding neighborhood. This supplemental information has been attached with the original Staff Report outlining the details of the project. Also attached, is a Resolution of Approval and siggested conditions of approval should the Commission wish to approve this project. BACKGROUND: Several issues were identified at the previous public hearing relative to the environmental impact of the proposed substation on the sur- rounding neighborhood. Residents and Commissioners alike questioned why this particular site was chosen and expressed concern as to the impact the proposed. substation would have on the property values and lifestyles of resi- dents in the area. The attached supplemental report compiled by the Edison L,ompany contains a detailed analysis of these concerns. The en,ineers and technicians who prepared the report will be available at the public hearing to answer any questions. ANALYSIS: Substation need The demand for electrical distribution substations is based upon ultimate load requirements for electricity in a given area. The total load assur.iption (electrical demand) has been calculated at 101.44 MW for the Alta Loma area. Because of line loss and voltage drop inherent its line equipment, the appli- cant maintains that a substation is needed in the Alta Loma area to supply sufficient electrical power to meet total load assumption demands. El V I Staff Report CUP 81 -05 -2- August 12., 1981 Location Study The supplementary report identifies 5 site selection criteria used by Southern California Edison to select the site under consideration. These criteria basically identify the availability, cost, and location of land in relation to load demand. A detailed study- of six alternate sites was perpared by Edison Company officials which resulted in the purchase of the site at the northwest corner of Archibald and Wilson. The reasons for the selection are contained the the attached supplemental report. Economic Impact The supplenerdal report contains an economic study of the economic impact of substation facilities on surrounding residential property values. T:i study includes two substations, a 66 KV substation similar to that applied for in this C.U.P., and a 220 KV substation similar to the Padua substation located on the corner of Campus and Base Line Avenues in Upland. In both cases, conversations with local real estate agents and the developers in- dicated no difficulty in selling homes adjacent to these substations. Additional material used in this study will be available at the public hearing. Lower Pad Elevation Study During the public hearing process, nearby residents expressed 3 desire to see the interior pad elevation lowered to maximize the screening effect of walls and landscaping. Lowering the interior pad elevation 2 feet would necessitate shifting the south and east perimeter walls 4 feet to 'the south and east to maintain the required 2:1 slope grade along the north and west perimeters of the station pad. The applicant has prepared revised line of site drawings to indicate the effect of lowering the nad elevation. Noise Levels A noise level survey has been prepared to determine the impact of the pro- posed substation upon existing ambient levels. The projected ambient levels for both day and night are well within the acceptable range for residential densities of this nature. The highest projected soung level is 43 DBA which is below the 45 to 55 DBA noise level indicated in the General Plan as an acceptable level which would not interupt speech or normal activity in this type of zone. r Staff Report 0 CUP 81 -05 -2- August 12, 1981 Radio and TV Interference Studies prepared by the Southern California Edison Company indicate that radio and TV interference attributed to substations is negligible. Tele- vision and radio ambient noise measurements will be taken by the Edison Company prior to installation of the facility and after the substation is energized. Any significant differences in these readings which can be traced to the substation facilities would be corrected. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission conJact a public hearing to consider all public input relative to the concerns of this project. Upon reviewing the concerns and considerations regardir••I this development, it is recommended that the Planning Commission take at-tion to either find the development consistent and compatible with the City's guideline: or deny the project should the Commission find that this facility cannot be constructed to mitigate 'he concerns to an acceptable level. Respectfully subritted, JACK LAM, Director of Community Development JL:DC:cd Attachments p. R. VERNUE 01a T wtcT rL.La,w 1 1 l Southern California Edison Company 1351 E. FRANIAS STREET OAS ARIO. CALI ORNIA 91761 July 31, 1981 Community Development Departme_t Planning Division C4--- Oi � ca -long P. O. Box 793 Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: rlr. Idichael Vairin, Senior Planner Gentlemen: I have attached a booklet which contains the results of rather comprehensioe studies of these items you suggested in your letter of June 29, 1981 to Don Bailey. tle have expanded on some of the areas in order to provide members of the Plaxning Commission with which we hope will be sufficient information for the Planning Commission to make a. favorable decision. I have also requ:sted that the engineers and technicians who assisted in preparing this report be present at the Planning Commission meeting, and they will be available to respond to any questions which are not covered in the attached material. RRV:mb Attachment Yours truly, a R. R. Vezrue I Q is S, NEED FOR SUBSTATION In the city of Rancho Cucamonga north of 19th Street arc approximately 8 square miles. 1. Ultimate Load Density Assumption 2 lots per acre = average 6 kW demand per lot (historical on summer day) 2 x 6 x 640 Acres = 7.68 MW per Square Mile 7.68 x 8 = 61.44 MW Shopping Centers + College + Condo's = 40 M-1 Total Load Assumption 101.44 MW 2. Line Loss and Voltage Drop For the largest wires capable of being held by by poles when at full load, there is a 18 voltage drop for energy 1,127 feet, which is 4.72 drop per mile, or about 6 volts. With the installation of capacitors, the voltage loss is reduced; however, voltages cannot be maintained at acceptable levels where wire miles exceed 5 miles on loaded circuits. 3. Economic Impact Voltage loss results in deterioration of adequate service to customers' facilities. Low voltages to motors in air conditioners, refrigerators, TV's and small appliances have an adverse effect on their operations and on some occasions result in damage to the equipment. Low voltage conditions have a great impact on the Southern California Edison Company both in expense and customer relations. The Company dispatches crews to make a thorough investigation of every customer complaint of low voltage. An increase in these calls results in additional manpower, overtime expense, and delays in time to respond, and irritation to the customer. 11 ,.M If !. SITE SELECTION CRITERIA 1. As near the load center as possible for both present and future growth. 2. Vacant land. 3. Existing overhead facilities along streets. 4. Every effort to acquire a piece of property - ithout condeMnation. 5. Locate and construct at reasonable expense. SELECTION PROCESS AND RESULTS Site 1: Wes- side Beryl Street, south of Manzanita., Owner had tract map filed. Did not wish to sell. Site 2: West side Hellma:i, south of Tillside. Property encumbered by blanket flood control easement. Representative of Flood Control District stated that the District would wish to retain this easement. Not advisable to build a substation on land with Flood Cori o l District easement. Site 3: Southwest corner Hillside and Archibald. Property not available. Ownt.r does not desire to sell. Site 4: North of the end of Amethyst - adjacent transmission lines. $2,307,000 not economical. Substation would only serve within 180 degrees. Site A: Northwest corner. Wilson and Archibald. Although east of load center would be able to meet energy requirements to the west because Cucamonga Canyon Wash prevents future development westerly. Site was purchased. Site B: Northeast corner Hillside and Amethyst. Properly available, however, encumbered on a portion by Flood Control easement. Also no overhead facilities west on Hillside. Not advisable to construct substation. 71 �� li II qp UA a "D 0 0 IM us a a 0 a 5 Z CL o =10 U. W US 711 11 ��LAI r J� ` �R�, R 1' t•,�• -'_ I'�� t ', I d Ir 171 �I 91 °i3 L-L 4: ..F, JU 7 pleqs L�E-tf 7;J1 Fl-i Pon 7v QK 34, Jh --4 jz CJ r ti �� li II qp UA a "D 0 0 IM us a a 0 a 5 Z CL o =10 U. W US 711 11 ��LAI r J� ` �R�, R 1' t•,�• -'_ I'�� t ', I d Ir 171 �I 91 °i3 L-L 4: ..F, JU 7 pleqs L�E-tf 7;J1 Fl-i Pon 7v QK 34, Jh --4 jz CJ r ;0 C G �ECACWM%G -- TKI?Ac:r The attached study was prepared by: Jim DeNatale Property Appraiser 9 Years - SCE & Independent Experience: Cal State, Fullerton B.A. Degree Rio Hondo Community College A. A. Degree Real Estate Member Testified as an Expert Witness Finance & Real Estate Business (Real Estate) Real Estate Certificate Broker since 1973 California Association of Realtors National Association of Realtors Huntington Beach /Fountain Valley Board of Realtors Superior Court, Riverside & San Bernardino Counties Applied and awaiting acceptance as an Associate Member of the Society of Real Estate Appraisers., 4. r July 27, 1981 L. G. PP.UTSOS SPECIAL SERVICES SUBJECT: Alta Loma Substation Site City of Rancho Cucamonga In accordance with your request of July 1, 1981, Right of Way and Land Department, Appraisal Section, has completed a study regarding the economic effect of substation facilities on surr.'ounding residential property values. The study included two (2) substations, South Substation (220 kV) in Cerritos and Parlvood Substation (66 kV) in La Habra. The following is a summary of our findings: South Substation Location: Northeast corner of Del Amo Boulevard and Studebaker Road in the city of Cerritos. Size: The substation and rights of ways encompass approximately 33+ acres. Adjacent to and north of the substation is a 131 lot single family residential subdivision, Tract No. 24011. The tract was filed and constructed during 1968. Currently, homes in this tract range in value from $125,000 to $136,500, depending on size and amenities. The tract is very well maintained and repre- sentatives vesOff ownership. Go denWest Realtors, Real conversations RealEstateSpecialistse and Tiffany Real Estate, homes in this tract usually sell in a reasonable time, with no regards to their proximity to the substation. In order to substantiate these opinions, an analysis was made Of sales over a two -year period. The sales relied upon took place between July 1979 and July 1981. In our opinion, these sales indicate the attitudes of typical buyers. As a result of our findings, the substation and related rights of ways have no adverse effect on the value of the real estate in this area. Parkwood Substation Location: Approximately a of a milq southwest of the inter- section of Imperial Highway and Idaho Street, City of La Habra. 0 Size: The substation contains approximately 2+ acres. G -2- Adjacent to and east of the substation is a new single - family residential subdivision, the first phase of which was completed three years ago. Sales representatives of Classic Homes (developers) explained that only three homes are available that are new and not resales. One home has a direct view of the substation and is difficult to sell_ Presently, there is no landscaping blocking this view. However, the homes adjacent to the station were among the first sold. The owners have indicated no noise or T.V. and radio interference. The sales representatives explained that if the station was properly landscaped, they would not have encountered any difficulty in selling the remaining homes. To summarize our findings, we feel that there is no adverse impact on the value of homes adjacent to substation .facilit;es. With proper landscaping, the stations can be made to blend into a neighborhood. Hack. -up material for this study will be available at the public nearing August 12, 1981, and Mr. DeNatale, R/W & Land, Appraisal Section, will be in attendance to answer any questions. CDuarte:ldd cc: R. R. Verrue R. W. Bond J. L. Renner D. W. Dailey In d fp 1. L e. A. C. TAYLO RIGHT OF WAY AND LAND DEPAR TENT C ALTA LOMA SUBSTATION GPUZZED PAD ELEVATION REVIEW Further subgrading of the interior pad for Alta Loma Substation was reviewed with the Southern California Edison Company Archi- tectural Design and Civil Engineering Departments. The primary concern in lowering the pad elevation is maintaining adequate space for the ultimate planned electrical facilities and clearances for maintenance and operation. Each foot 'lower in pad elevation requires moving the electrical facilities two feet to the south and east. This is required to maintain a 2:1 grading slope along the north and west perimeters of the station pad. Lowering the interior pad elevation two feet would also shift the south and east perimeter walls four feet to the south and east, as the interior of the station does x.ot provide adequate space for a two-foot cut slope inside the south and east walls. Realigning the south and east walls four feet, as originally shown on our submitted Site Development Plan, would still retain the 25 -foot setback along Wilson Avenue; however, 72 linear feet of the east wall would extend three feet into the 25 -foot setback along Archibald Avenue at the northeast_ corner. ( Dropping the interior pad elevation two feet and moving the south and east walls four feet would have minimal effect on the line of sight from Wilson and Archibald Avenues, except at the transition where the cut and fill areas meet a'.ong Archibald Avenue. The daylight area between cut and fill comes approximately at the station entrance gate from Archibald Avenue. The effect of the above detailed subgrading is outlined in "Red" on the attached cop.�es of the original submitted Site Development Plan, Sheets 1 and Any further depression of the station pad would adversely affect the station design and placement of interior electrical facilities. The Southern California. Edison Company feels the Site Development Plan as originally submitted provides adequate screening of the substation interior facilities. After a few years growth, the landscaping as shown, along with the City's request for the additional landscaping on the west and north sides, will provide adequate screening of the interior facilities that will be visible above the perimeter walls, .0 % E LA 1 I l , 3- a3= :bC a•�F - Y n �. d n •r - �0- 4•—.- �-- 1�-i -G rt I1 nl _ a law IL b_ S •' 't Sr ;'a b 1 33 ii 7 V k..b.. a� f Y A • ; t a, r fie: 1� .e � A I `� '•L O A I gz S •' 't Sr ;'a b 1 33 ii 7 V k..b.. a� f Y A • ; t a, r fie: VI I 3 � k _ -1.1 Da �� oil _r 'P 0 rft. �3� a Fn 3 h Sy o" 1� `� '•L r A _I VI I 3 � k _ -1.1 Da �� oil _r 'P 0 rft. �3� a Fn 3 h Sy o" w• l C T r a i 3 ` z mil �R �y ,t. 4 a O El vp 7Z I I Ll 0 — > i, 1 111 �- .."v._ l!�I ❑• ,.`1 IF i, i I � 'Ol 'V1 _l Y^ V/ ii Il .r•,NI•ff :iA k a, ;io pro 40 r..- 1 I j' I I,� I I I� N- v w cS) I ►o I ,E I .1. „- �f1 s I I a:' es• y. J - I M l,U) H v I n i 1-7 1 II I all February 12, 1981 r SUBJECT- Alta Loria Substation Sitc - Noise Level Projection A noise level survey was made by Apparatus Engineering between January 28, and February 1, 1981, to determine the ambient noise levels at the site of Alta Loma Substation. Projections have been calculated to determine the effect of the planned 1984, facilities on the existing ambient levels. The Alta Loma Substation site is located in an area zoned R -1 (Residential) within the incorporated city limits of Rancho Cucamonga, in San Bernardino County. Substations area permitted use with planning commission ar* ,�roval. It is bounded by Archibald Avenue on east. Wilson Avenue on the south and residential property on the west and north. The city of Rancho Cucamonga has no enacted noise ordinances •yt this time. San Bernardino County has a proposed noise ordinance which would limit noise levels to 50 dBA day and 45 dBA night when measured on my residential property line. These would be further reduced by 5 dBA for simple tone noises, such as from transformers, resulting in a proposed 4,5 dBA day and 4,0 dBA night limit. The measured ambient noise levels and the projected levels that have been calculated, assu._.inr, that two new Edison standard transformers will be installed, are: The above table indicates that almost all of the projected noise levels are within the limits of the proposed San Bernardino County noise ordinance. Only the night time levels for the east and south property lines are projected to be above the proposed limits by 1 dBA. This is not expected to cause any significant impact because the station is buffered from those residential properties by Archibald and Wilson Avcnucs. There are increases projected above the existing ambient 'levels for all of the locations shown. These projections assume that there will be no increase in ambient noise levels between now and the time the station will be constructed. This is a conservative assumption for it is apparent that the need for the station is depend- ent upon future growth, and future growth will be accompanied by an increasing, noise level. ( Sound Level - dBA Existing Ambient Projected Location Day Night Day Ni.rit North Site Line 35 33 36 34 North well 35 33 39 37 East Wall (Archibald Ave.) 35 33 4,3 41 South Wall (Wilson Ave.) 35 33 4,3 41 West Wall 35 33 39 37 West Site Line 35 33 36 34, Resid. Prop. West 35 33 36 34 Resid. Prop. South 35 33 4,b 38 The above table indicates that almost all of the projected noise levels are within the limits of the proposed San Bernardino County noise ordinance. Only the night time levels for the east and south property lines are projected to be above the proposed limits by 1 dBA. This is not expected to cause any significant impact because the station is buffered from those residential properties by Archibald and Wilson Avcnucs. There are increases projected above the existing ambient 'levels for all of the locations shown. These projections assume that there will be no increase in ambient noise levels between now and the time the station will be constructed. This is a conservative assumption for it is apparent that the need for the station is depend- ent upon future growth, and future growth will be accompanied by an increasing, noise level. ( ALTA LOMA SUBSTATION TVI AND RFI AMBIENT MEASUREMENTS The magnitudes and effects of acoustic noise, Television Interference (TVI) and Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) inside, and at the immediate vicinities of substations, was monitored and evaluated by Southern California Edison Research and Development Organization beginning in 1977. Special empha!�is was placed on technical papers published by CIGRE *, Joint USA - USSR Conunittee on .Electrical Power and other European Journals. At the substations monitored, the measurement locations were off the ends of transformer banks, switchrack buses and trans - mission Line entrances_ The loop antenna was used for AM broadcast and the biconical antenna for TV VHF band measurements. In all cases, the antennas were uriented for maximum pickup of noise (pointed toward bards and buses). The antenna height for either the loop or the biconical was approximately 10 feet aboveground. For the AIM broadcast measurement, the "Broad" bandwidth was used as it best simulates a standard All receiver. The above study, which was completed in 1979, confirmed that the TVI and RFI noise attributed to substations is negligible. Southern California Edison presently has over 800 substations on our system. Minimal comnlairi-s concerning TVI and RFI interference from electrical substations are received annually. When the complaint is received, and the interference is traced directly to a substation, the problem is identified and corrected. A major portion of the complaints are traced to sources other than substations. TVI and RFI ambient noise measurements will be taken by Edison prior to the installation of Alta Loma Substation facilities. After the substation is energized, the TVI and RFI ambient noise measurements will again be taken. Any significant difference in these readings, which can be traced to the substation facilities, will be corrected. The above information was prepared ny J. L. Renner, Southern California Edison Company Property Engineer in cooperation with the Research and Development Department, and E. R. Schlinger, Senior Engineer., Telecommunications Department, Southern California Edison Company. * CIGRE - Conference Internationale Des Grands Reseaux Blectriques (Int.ernational Conference on Large Bigh Voltage Electric Systems) Staff R,cport CUO E1 -05 - Edison -2- June 24, 1981 facility will be screened through normal blockwall construction and landscaping. As can be seen from the Grading and Site Plan, Edison also proposes to sub - grade as much of the facility as possible to alleviate this problem. Irr addition, staff is recommending that a dense screen of trees and shrubs be planted around the perimeter of the facility. The Commission could further mitigate the immediate impact of these views, if it is a concern, by requiring specimen size trees to be planted along these boundaries. This would provide stronger screening immediately upon installation. To improve the general aesthetics of the facility, Edison has proposed decorative screenwalls on mounded earth around the entire perimeter of the site with significant amounts of landscaping. Sections and eleva- tions of the wall designs are attached for your review. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all public input relative to the concerns of this project. Upon reviewing the concerns and considerations regarding this development, it is recommended that the Planning Commission take action to either find the development consistent and compatible with the City policies and guidelines based upon the recommended conditions of approval or deny the project should the Commission find that this facility cannot be constructed to mitigate the concerns to an acceptable level. 1112,6pectfuPy submitted, / ARRY K. HOGA Gity Planne BKH.MV:cd Attachments: CITY OF RANCI -10 CUC, YXGA STAFF REPORT DATE. May 13, 1981 T0: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: a.n Sub- station of 4.78 acres of land in the R -1 -20 zone, located on the northwest corner of Archibald and Wilson Avenues - APN 1061- 571 -04 ABSTRACT: The applicant has completed the development and design review process for an electrical distrubution substatiun to be located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Wilson Avenue. It is now before the Planrring Commission for their rev ew and consideration. Because of its location in a. residential ne gh- borhood, the applicant has provided abundant landscaping and wails to provide a visual buffer between the facility and surrounding neighborhood. Staff has reviewed the project and has provided con- ditions of approval for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting review and approval f)r the eveToFment of an electrical distribution substation on 2.42 acres of the total parcel of 4.78 acres. The substation will coi- sist of a single - story relay house, switchracks, transformer banls, and other appi-rtenant equipment (Exhibit "B"). Two overhead trais- mission lines will emanate from the substation,'but all distribu ion lines will be underground. The remainder portion of the project site could be subdivided into 4 single - family residential h ;lf -acre lots as shown in Exhibit "D ". The total project site is bounded 3n the west and south by single - family residences, or, the north by a citrus grove, and on the east by vacant land and a single- family residence, as indicated on Exhibit "A ". The project site is pre- sently a vacant field and contains no significant vegetation or structures. The existing grade slopes from the north to the soutl at approximately a 5% grade. The property is presently zoned R -1- 20,000 (single- family residential), and the General Plan designat +s thin site as very low density residential (Less than 2 dwelling units per acre). --� -- CITY OF R,a1C1 -10 CLC. - - \GA, STAFF RE, PORF 'E: June 24, 1J31 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSN.ENT_AND CONDI NAL USE PEP.MTT N 1977 81-05 • SOUTHERN CALIFORNTA EDISON COMPANY - The develop - ment of en electrical d •ibution substation located on 4.78 acres of land in the R -1 -23 zone, located or. the northwest corner of Archibald A -enue and Wilson Avenue - APN 1u61- 571 -04 ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission has continued the public :iearing on this matter since May 13, 1981 to allow representatives of the Ed'.son Company to meet with property owners in the immediate area of the project site to discuss their concerns and clarify the design of the project. Edison Company. Officials -net with approximately 30 people on June 9, 1981 to present the project details and clarify any questions ur issues. The project is now before the Planning Commission for your final review and consideration of th4 Conditional Use Permit. Please find attached a copy of the original :iaft Report outlining the details of this project. Also at. ached, is a Rnsnl :pion of Approval and suggested conditions of approval should the Commission wish to approve this project. BACKGROUND: The request for the development of an electrical sub- I station. requires review and approval by the Planning Commission to detern.ine land use and aesthetic compatibility with surrounding and adjacent properties. Typical concerns - elated to a facility of this nature gcnerallv focus upon aesthetics and views ;.,to the pr•,ject site. Some cl tF° concerns that wr.re brought out by the' residents in the area relate to noise, views, and general aesthetics. Edison has conducted some noise studies to determine the existing ambient ( surrounding) noise levels of the site. From this base, Edison has projected what the noise levels will be with the installation of transformers that would be required for this facility. The projected sound levels for both day and night are well within the normal acceptable .rann<• For residential densities of this nature. The General Plan in- dicates a 45 to 55 dBA r:oi.;e level as an acceptable level which would noz interupt speech or normal activity in this type of zone. Edison has also prepared line of sight drawings from Y.lu:,man Avenue to show potential views from those prr_cise locations (These will be on display at meetiry). Owners along Klusman were concerned that the difference in grade from their homes to the Edison facility would cause an cbject:onablz view into the interior of the facility. Based upon The ;t!c{-ions that have been completed by Edison, the majority of the ITEM A CUP 81 -05 -2- i4ay 13, 1981 ANALYSIS: The site development plan, Exhibit "B ", has been developed in accordance with Zoning Ordinance standards ara requ'rements. Eiectr'%J distribution substations are allowed in the R -1 zone subject to a I.:,!:.iitional Use Permit. The building setbacks, perking areas, and landscaped areas are all being provided in accordance with standards and policies set by the Planning Commission. Archibald Avenue is a Special Boulevard and the applicant has proposed to landscape it accord°.ngly (Exhibit "C "). Access to the site is being provided by a single driveway located approximately 200 feet north of Wilson Avenue on Archibald Avenue. Ir accordance with the Master Plan of Stre_ts and Highways, both streets are required to be improved along the entire length of the property. Street improvements would include paving nverlay, curbs, berming and landscaping, a meandering sidewalk on Atrhibald Avenue, and sidewalk on Wilson Avenue. The elevations, as shown on Exhibit "C ", indicate the use of abundant landscaping and decorative walls to screen the substation from view. The site .ill be graded such that the finished grade level of the substation is 8 to 10 feet below the land on the west and north. The proposed screen walls are to be constructed of cor.crete block with stucco finish and brown split -face black. The walls are designed with a minimum 8' height and will be paced atop berms to provide additional heieht for screening from the street level. As per the Design Review Committee comments, walls along Wilson Avenue and Archibald Avenue have been placed behind the 25 -.00t building setback line. Colored elevations will be available at -ne Planning Commissic7% meeting. The intent of the hermirg, sub - graded pad and walls is to limit the visibility and Nmpact to adjacent area. It is unlikely that the facility will be totally screened. Staff recommends that a row of dense trees be planted 15 feet on center along the north and west boundaries of the facility. This will help provide serer ^ing for properties to the north and west. The Design Review Committee worked with the arplicant to formulate the design which is presently tefor•-� the commission. The Committee recommends approval of the design with emphasis on the landscaping around the perimeter of the site. Part I of :;a Initial study as completed by the applicar,`c is provided for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Par: II of the Environmental Assessment and de ?ir- mined that although the project could have an impact on the environment Srom an aesthetic viewpoint, that adequate m-,tigation measures have been proposed to eliminate significant adverse impacts. If the i CUP 81 -05 -3- May 13, 1981 Alk Commission concurs with such findings, then the issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing notice was advertised in the Daily Report newspaper on May 1, 1981, and 29 public hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the project site. Residents living on b oth sides of Archibald and north of the project site have expressed concern with the visual appearance of a substation. RECOMMENDATION: ;t is recommended that the Planning Sommisison review and consider the various aspects of this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings and analysis of Staff, the appropriate conditions of approval are attached for your review and consideration. Respectfully submitted, BARRY K. HOGAN City Planner BKH:DC:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Exhibit "D" - Conceputal Sate Development Plan Part I - initial Study Resolution of Approval Conditions 11 11 �� t 't, '' � � lid, � �� t � It Y 1 � l { '�. ' .t I � I t �� s S t \ it •� t t 1 (� I ' t 1 4� 1 1 � 1 .1 �'� t � �.. t � t �,�' 4 1� � �.. '�� I �t I ,��• � � � r l,' ' • � ft � n ,, �::�� ...�,. r .w -�/ ' / •Lw�� ., f _1 M.MFY ' ICJ % ~, �I!- \ v-. LI 6WITGM4/.CM � l •��..�� iM � `� y m�. �n 7 Z.. � , .Ta,.w•i t Twhwa. I I � •. 1 _..- n� .•�-' �•.��/ - .- I_- UVt,.'. -j WK i.. �1K i I Q✓.yy' ; - '+ i' ^y. �, 1� I. � C • { � iYfr.A 14MI.w ...nary (' �� l - 7r"' •�. -ti• +� !{b'«o:°x",..,n Itl'.',v I. �% I: / i'ZI .. I,. ,�<.._�^a�e µd% . ' ^• __It°— ...-- '•Jy/.�. ."' <'t.3••.Y,. YIM� /1 'aY .sW' !tpl IF'•Yi •:'P /. 9! ...�. •�, =•YK •y' ^�,�- +G�' -y_ (^ I 1. L. _ i'�- .Sf. °y� �.'`FU �..�dil} �% I� c I . .. ••.inn • � =i' '_9a'.-_ _ ... _. I _. _. 4. f t CITY OF 11AI\TCHO C'I;C.�,iVI(JiTGA PLANNING DIVLSION !TEN is _. Cop 61 !70 TITLE. __ _ !fi--- pi,6&L EXHIBIT.--f5 _ SCALE:_ ..... L� NORTH pr-. 771 Li W1 -A—, Ir-";.i ' r PM mow r. xr ilk mow r. xr 1729. co L07 2 2/ 500! JF �y ca7� 2/500 •. ^i ` nl I /oT a ?D�0007F 64 W/LSON AIc:: ✓E U LOT / 20000 5F ✓Ti2E_ °7 lJED /VAVO /J !7012/W) �Y LO, 5 dfall Low Jug SO. LTJG /F. 6'D 150N 106,00..D 5- I ul :r Uj Q C� a .l [b Q u n CV NORTH CI "r Y 0�' ITEM: Cop go n RA Y' ,�-i0 CUCANI�it'G� TITLE: �'PVih�. ISMS Pl PLANNING DIVISiON EXI IIBIT -_ 0 _ SCALE= 0� .r Ll CITY OF RANCHO CUCA140MCA INITIAL STUDY PART I — PROJECT INFORMATION SKEET — To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $70.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Revi. w Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of .this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which tir.._: the project is to be heard. The Committee will male one of three determinations: 1) The- project will have no environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will tie filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Alta i•oma Substation APPLICAt•;T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Southern California Edison Company, 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue, Rosemead, Ca. 91770 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Don W. Bailey, -Room-30- , (213) ;1 -2879. LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) North West corner of Archibald Ave. and Wilson Ave, intersection. Asoessocr Parcel No /Ofol -S7J- 04 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAI, AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING ,;UCH PERMITS: Site Approval - City of Rancho Cucamonga Grading B Fencing, Permit - f5ty of Rancho Cucamonga Building Permit - City of Rancr,_Cucamo^.1-a Encroachment Permit - City of Rancho Cucamonga _ x -1 ,.f PROJECT DESCRIPTION A DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Alta Loma Subsite will be used for a new aesthetically treated low Drofile 66/12kV distribution substatiOn ultimately consisting or a single story relay house, nine positions of _66kV switchrack, four. 44.4MVA 66/12kV trans- _ former banks, r:evrnteen nos ;r ;nnc of 12kV .^.wit ", a••k four 121,V a ar;tor bank^ an�i other appurtenant eauipm nt aszoci.ated with a distr ;hu "nn ct,7tion_ The hiahr—t ;uhntar ;nn structure will be 15 feet above its pad level. All distribution lines emanating from the station will be underground. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED SL''LDINGSa IF ANY: Total parcel- 4.78 Acves• Proiect Site: 2.42 Acr^ ; Relav House: 693 sq. feet. DESCRIBE THE-EATVIRON% %_YrAL SrTTI:TG OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORI`LATION 014 TOPOGF.,APEY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTUPAL, HISTORICAL OR SCEI•TIC ASPECTS, iJSE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND TTIE DESCRIPTION OF AN7Z EXIST II:G STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH 1=E CESSARY SHEETS) The 4.78 Acre site is vacant and used as nature land for livestock. trees exist on the site anc, grazing has .,educed the veIctacion to _ 1i ^htly covered weeds and grass. The proiect site terrain slopes North to South with a rel±af of approximately 25 feet. No signs _ Mr soil erosion zxists. Any animals existing on the site would be confined to small rodents. There are no cultural„ historical or scenic aspects known to exist on the site. Two story single family r nl enrev exists ^npth of Wi non Ave adjacent to the south Single storm single family, residences exists to the west of the 4.78 acre parcel. To the north the area contains a citrus grove with a two stor farm house, barn and other small sheds. Across Archibald avenue, adiaccvt to the east, the area is vacent. Is f-he project, Dart of .a larger project, one of a zeri�s of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a .hole have significant cnviron:nental impact? The orii.inal interior installation will be the electrical equipment and additions may be made in the future, as required, to meet the e demai —n or -t the ar !a that is served. 1 -2 El WILT, TIIIS PROJECT: YES NO t� X i. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibraticn? X s. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage-, etc.)' _ _3C 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general ;lan designations? X 5- Remove �,inv existing trees? How many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? ExFlana.tion of any yrS answers above: ?MPORTANT: if the pro ;ect involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information prese•ited are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further uiderstand that additional information may br! req••ircd tc be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the DeveLopnent Review Committee. "I Date r"L`u�� -{ G , / %P� Signature ( 1�'' /fi+ � ?T1� Title PROPERTY ENGINEER 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAXI . NGA MEMORANDUM DATE: November 6, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: PARK DEVELOPMENT PHASING FOR VICTORIA WINDROWS VILLAGE The attached phasing schedule was recr�:ved after the completion of the staff report, for TT 11334, but .c will be a topic of discussion during the public hearing next Tuesday night. Briefly, the plan calls for park development at a ratio of 485 sq. ft. of par{: area for each dwelling unit. With that formula, 1.6 acres of the cei.tral park, Victoria Parkway, plus the trail within the 5,000 sq. ft. lot area would be developed at a buildout of TT 11934 (753 units). The 8 -acre central park would be completed when 1728 units are built. 66,c4 T Cart "ohns on Assistant Planner CJ:jk Attach. Co;;,;n,i� f 9613 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE K. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 • (71GS 980 -2244 �I DFpT Aa3� 7�Oo °i10i1111zfIi te�� All November 5, 1981 Mr. Jack ?,am,Planning Dept. City of Ran -',.o Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Ranc'_io Cucamonga,ialifornia 91730 Subject: Park Phasing, Victoria Windrows Village Dear Jack: Attached is•a Park Phasing.schedule and a`map of Tentative Tract #11934 park area;.. Our recommendation for provision of parka is spelled out in these documents,but basically we arrived at this -recommendation as follows: #1 Park acreage required for the entire planning area of Victoria was 100 acres. Figuring ?,000 units within that 10 Mal acres equals 485 square feet of park land pe:: dwelling unit. To pace pack development. then, to housing, will assure that the amoun- of park land provided will not outstrip the ability of th'e homeowners to support the maintenance of those parks, and will also provide a measure as to whether the Lyon Company is dedicating and improving.parks ahead of a reasonable standard or behind. kith that in mind, we basically would pronosz the following phasing of the parks. Phase 1 of the parks will include Victoria Linear Parkway South and Parkway North, Totaling 9.2 acres. These two sections of the parkway from Baseline through to T.: °'boundary of the West loop within the Tentative Tract will be installed prior to oc- cupancy•of dwelling units within Victoria. This needs to be the entrance for the Planned Community at the time i—itiai sales are started. A-ay other entrance would not do justict to a plan of this scope and scale, and because the Parkway is the initial en- trance to the development, to put in. to vehicular without the parks, we think, would not be proper. Consequently, we see that park going in up front. fhe Parkway North we feel is of direct benefit to the homeowners within t'!e Tentative Tract. The Parkway South, we feel initially is for the benefit of the William Lyon Company. In our attempting, to provide park at a rai.:.o that benefits the homeowners, then, relative to Trait x%11934, we will not include the Parkway South in our cs:lculations to provide ?ark land for the residents of this tract - REAL ESTATE CEVELO?MENT 11 . 11 Jack Lam l .JKOP AV ,L I LYON -2- November 5, 1981 For purposes, then, for calculating how much park will be required, Pae -way North has 5.1 acres, . and at a ratio of 485 square feet per dwelling unit, basically we will require 459 lots to support it, in terms of maintenance. We are proposing that 307 lots in the southern portion of the Tcntative, Below the park, be noted to coincide with that 5.1 acres of park, plus at this point an unspecified 152 lots within the North portion of the Tentative. In other words, the first 459 lots park requirements will be met by the 5.1 acres in Park- way North. , •o n We then propose that 1.6 acres of the Central Park be the next Phase, and that that Phase be completed upon the completion of an additional 141 Lots in Tentative Tract North. Finally, relative to the first 760 lots, we also recommend that the internal trails within the 5,000 square foot lot area, totaling 1.7 acres, be completed as homes adjacent to them are completed, but that both trails be 100% completed upon the completion of the remaining 160 lots within Tentative Tract #11934. In summary then, we are proposing that Parkway North, the East and West :rails within the 5,00 square foot lot area, plus 1.6 acres of Central Park, all be completed basically at the rate of 485 square feet per unit as the first Tentative Map is developed. in addition to that being phased at a rate consistent with home cfevelopment, keep in mind that 4.1 acres of parks will have been completed in a:ivance of all the above. at Parkway South. We would reo_uest that Parkway South be credited to developments that are adjacent to that below the railroad tracks. In other words, were we to come in with a 368 unit condominium project adjacent to Parkway South we would be 4:z:: ng that Parkway South be the park credit for that number of anits. We propose that the Central Park ceiapleted in three additional phases of roughly two acrea each, paced at a rate of roughly 2 r.cres per 200 units of housing, such that the Central Park would be finished upon completion of 600 lots following completion of the first Tentative Map of 760 lots. The balance of Victoria Linear Park from the West Loop within the Tentative Map West :o the Village boundary at Day Creek would be completed at the time Victoria Parkway is extended to develop the properties in the Village West of T.v Creek Boulevard. We are recommending that that particular section of Linear Park be delayed as long as pors'ible, to allow completion of the Central Park as soon as possible. Jack Lam r-r ,e, 71?wW_IILT�Ie'VVI -2- The a?-ove Pne.cing Plan, I think, maces the City, the W ;lliam Lyon Company, as well as be li\7in2 Victoria, as Victoria evolves. No, -enber 5, 1981 most sense for the homeowners who will PI While the completion of the Central Park will not b:,on this bas -s, perhaps as early or as rapid as some would like, it w:11 be developed at a ratio that the homeowners within Victoria can support, and wil.1 thus prevent a nrain on City resources for a geograph`_cal area that will be somewhat remote from people other `.that'are payine. for it. tan. Vi reside= 6;. resides, The urgency of installing the Central Park up front while de- sirable, in my opinion, is not really necessary. There arr 50,000 people liv ng in Cvxa:monga now, with no park at all. The residents of.Victoria will be treated to 9 -Acres of Linear Par' at initial move -in. Following completion of 600 homes, there Will be at least a 1.6 acres park completed.. Depending on market conditions, I believe that the first phase o the Central Park could be completed within_ one to twc years of the first occupanc Our experience has shown that asjorg s people know o when some- thing will be developed and improved, a able that it will not be an excessive burden on them, that that is a workable solution. I would propose that we adopt this phasing Schedule, but that we also have a Sunset clause that requires that Phase 1 of the park be completed as soon as 600 lu Z are completed but not later than three years from the first occupancy within ' Tentative Tract #11934. 4 Sincerely, THE WILLLAM_ L!ON COMPAIN GARY FRYE Regional Manager pmm cc: Mike Vairin O:Yrt Johnston' Bi11 Holly Lloyd Hubbs Members of the Planning Commission 5, fFo C, I V,,o-f -rr-At� '* rA"-WAY i I PARK ?FAS'_ _G PAR.( ACREAGE 'L?Q72RED Pa_t Standard: 100 acres for planning Area of 9000 units park Ratio per unit'. . , 485 s.f. T.Tr.C11934 "South" - 307 lots - 3.4 Acre park required. T.Tr.ii11934 "North "' - 4�lo`c - 8.4 Acre park required PAR:: AcnEACE IN T.TR_ 011934 T.Tr411934 Victoria Linear Park below Railroad tracks - 4.1 Acres T.Tr11934 Victoria Linear Park above (T._. "South') 1.7 " T.T_r111934 East & West Trails (T.Tr. °Nprtba):• TU-75—Ames Sub total: 8.0 T.TLv11934 Village Central Pr¢k (T.Tr. "North:) Acrea Tota : PAV1 ° AS'yG PLAN FORT TR. p11934 Lots par Rea.d Park ?rovidel 7b.y ictoria T.Tr.;11934 "South" 152 Linear Park "North "b y'%ts -5.1 No. of RR Total Cum. lots . _ Ac.'_teq. g=- A•Prov. n'. d T.T_r.:111934 "North" Total Cum Lots T.Tr.A1934 "North" Total Cum lots 141 lots -1.6 1.6 Acre of Ac. Central ?k. lots F00 lots 160 lots -1.7 1.7 Acre of Ac.Req. East & West Trails 760 lots -8.4 Ac.-eq. 8.4 Acres Provided PARK PHASING FOR WINDROWS VILLAGE EAST OF EDISON CORRIDOR NOT A ?ART OF T.TR. 01 34 Central Park Remaining - 8.0 Acres - 1.6 acres - 6.4 as - 575 units Develop park in phases of 12.0 acres or 1 1.5 acres park for each 1 200 units VICTOR_'. LlYSAR PARK SOUTH OF RAILROAD TRACKS Credit 100x to deve:opments south of railroad tracks: 4.: acres - 368 units •:u'rXwrswNrori.c:o. t3o added parks requ�'icd above Linear Park up to 368 units) re.Tgoc C04L°LSTION VICTORIA L_'AR PAY.K WEST CF T. TR. D1'_934 After com letzon of L:^. areas on '•'est side o?''., i'1'O34 "Loops ". Before_ occupancy of units west Of co= ridor. CJ �11 ILI I] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 10, 1981 T0: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack i_am, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT" AND TENTATIVE TRACT :1Q. 11934 - LYON - A residential tract subdivision consisting of 756 lots on 192- acres of lznd in the Planned Community zone, a portion of the Victoria Planned Community, located north of Base Line Road, south of Highland Avenue, and west of Etiwanda Avenue. ABSTRACT: The Applicants have submitted a Tract Map for the above - escri ed project in order to gain consideration of approval by the Planning Commissi,in. Approval of this project will necessitate ap- proval of a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract Map. The project has been reviewed by both the Design and Growth Management Review Committees and has passed the residential assessment system. Staff has prepared a detailed Staff Report, related Resolutions, and Conditions of Approval for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The Applicant, the William Lyon Company is requesting approval of their proposal in order to subdivide 192 - acres of land into 756 lots, including a 4.0 acre school site, an 8.0 acre park, a 1.5 acre church site, and the 9 acre parkway. The project is a portion of the Victoria Planned Community and is located north of Base Line Road, south of Highland Avenue, and west of Etiwanda Avenue (Exhibit "A"). The application is for a residential sub- division of land with lot sizes ranging in size from a minimum of 3,000 square feet to 7,200+ square feet (Exhibit "B "). Phasing of the project will iticlude four final tract maps as shown on Exhibit "C ". Tracts 11934, 12044, 12045, and a portion of 12046 are zoned Low- Medium Density Residential (4 -8 dwelling units per acre). The majority of tract 12046 is designated as Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). Tract 11934 has a density slightly less than 8 dwelling units per acre, while the remai[,ing t-•acts are approximately 4 units per acre. ITEM C Tentative Tract 11934 -2- As seen on Exhibit "D" the project site and contains little vegetation with only Eucalyptus windrows near the park site. the Victoria Planned Community has been City Council when the Victoria text was November 10, 1981 is presently vacant, undeveloped, grass and scattered trees including An Environmental Impact Report for prepared and was certified by the adopted on May 20, 1981. The surrounding land use is given below and is described as follows: Direction Land Use North Polka Palace Restaurant southside of Highland, remainder of the land vacant East Scattered residential with some commer- cial and public land uses on Etiwanda Avenue, mostly vacant land with some orchards South Southern Pacific Railroad right -of -way, scattered residential, nursery, Heublein Distinary, farm land, mostly vacant West Mostly vacant with some farming I xhibit "E' shows the land use designation for the surrounding property within the Victoria Planned Community. ANALYSIS: The project, as shown on the attached development plans, is con - sIs nt with the General Plan and the Victoria Community Plan since it falls within the density range and lot size designated. The project is being developed in accordance with the State Subdivision .Map Act as well as the City's Subdivision Ordinance and requirements of the Victoria Community Plan. All lots conform to the minimum dimensions set forth in the Victoria Community Plan. Of the 753 residential lots within the subdivision, 130 have a minimum lot size of 3,000 square feet, 175 have a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet, and 448 have a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet. Typical lot dimensions in the 3,000 square foot area is 35'X85'. In the 5,000 square foot area, a typical lot dimension is 50'X,100' and in the 7,200 square foot area, 60'X120' Exhibit "F" illustrates the minimum lot size and required setbacks. In the 5,000 and 7,200 square foot lot areas- there are some larger lots scattered throughout to provide some variation in lot size (Exhibit "F "). 13 F_' L� 11 Tentative Tract 11934 -3- November 10, 1981 Three points of access will be provided into this project. On the north side of the tract, two access roads are provided off of Highland Avenue. The major access point will be Victoria Parkway which enters the South side of the tract off of Base Line Road. The right -of -way for Victoria Avenue will vary throughout the project from a minimum of 150' to a maximum of 180' in some areas (See Exhibit "C "). Both access roads on the north side of the tract will have a 73' right -of -way. The major looped road, Street "R ", and other collector roads will have 60' right - of -ways while the local streets are 44' right -or- -ways. Highland Avenue to the north of the project will require 44' of pavement curb to curb with a 7' half -width median required in the future. Also curb, gutter, and AC pavement is required on Highland Avenue across the Edison easement, west of the project. The preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan has been reviewed by the Grading Committee and given conceptual approval (Exhibit "G "). The Engineering Division has prepared Conditions of Approval for the required storm drain improvements and flood protection measures. The Applicant will be required to construct a concrete lined conversion channel to intercept runoff from the water course at Highland Avenue. Adequate inlet and outlet structures ® will also be required. The location of the terminus of this channel and method of discharge mast be approved by the City Engineer. Flood protection measures required must protect the project site from overflow of the Day Creek Channel and probable breakage of the Day Creek; Levy. A separate landscaping and lighting district must be formed for the entire Victoria Planned Community. To be included in this district will be the park area, Highland Avenue, Victoria Parkway, Loop Street "R ", and the open space trail area. The Applicant will be required to provide a Main- tenance Guarantee Bond for a period of one year from the date of annexation of these areas into the Maintenance District. Within the 3,000 square foot area, the Applicant is proposing that the City accept the driveway easements on lots 634, 635, and lots 651; 652, 653, 699, 700, and 701 (See Exhibit "B ", Sheet 4). The City Engineer feels that these easements should not be accepted and in turn lots 633, 654, and 698 should be designated as a mini -park area where required drainage and utility ease- ments can be located. At the center of this project is an 8 acre park, a 4 acre school site, and a 1.5 acre church site. The Etiwanda School District has agreed to accept the concept of shared playground facilities as proposed in this development. The Applicant is proposing a phased development of the park sites. However, a Condition of Approval for the Victoria Planned Community text requires that the park area within each village be developed prior to the construction of greater than 200 dwelling units within the village. The developer believes El Tentative Tract 11934 -4- November 10, 1381 that this condition is cost prohibitive, since he does propose to construct the nine acres of open space within the Victoria Parkway right -of -way prior to occupancy of any units. A related issue is the Engineering Division's requirement for open space within the 3,000 square foot area as mentioned above. If the park is not developed, the necessity for the tot lots is even greater. The 3,000 square foot area will offer the fewest amenities within this project because of its design and distance from the park. The combination of small lot sizes and restricted open areas leaves few opportunities for children's play areas. The minimum side yards required on these lots is 5' on each side with a rear yard of 12'. Also, children from this area going to the park must cross Victoria Parkway. For younger children, this is a potential hazard. Another issue to be considered is the design and placement of units within the 3,000 square foot area. While the application being considered is for the subdivision map only, Staff feels that it is extremely important to set parameters for the design concept to be considered by the Design Review Com- mittee in the coming months. The Applicant is proposing center plot units throughout the 3,000 square foot area based upon a desire in todays housing market for affordable single family detached units. While this assumption is not disputed, it will create a monotonous streetscape with rows of street facing garage doors and many driveways. Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee seriously consider zero lot line homes with side entry garages and combined driveways be utilized in conjunction with the center plot units and duplexes a_hen reviewing the final designs. This will increase the distance between driveways and provide greater flexibility in the design of the units. Exhibit ".H" illustrates the difference between the two concepts. The next major issue concerns recreational vehicle storage. A Condition of Approval for the Victoria text requires that 25% of the homes within the Low, Medium -Low, and Medium Density land use categories provide adequate space to store RVs. The 3,000 square foot lots do not have adequate side yards to meet 'this requirement, so a special storage lot is required (Exhibit "I "). The Applicant has proposed a temporary storage facility just north of the 3,000 square foot area. The design of this facility will be worked out in Design Review, but Staff recommends that the developer be required to submit a Master Plan for permanev.t RV storage lots within two (2) years from the date of this approva'i. Ir this way, adequate spaces will be left available for the facilities as the Victoria Community grows. The Design Review Committee reviewed the project and found that it was con- sistent with the requirements and goals of the Victoria Planned Community. Detailed colored renderings, Site Plans, and sections will be available for your review at the Planning Commission meeting. E 1 L.1 Tentative Tract 11934 -5- November 10, 1981 Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the Applicant, is attached for your review. Staff has completed the Environmental Check List and field investigation and has found that no significant adverse impacts not addressed in the Environmental Impact Report occur. If the Commission concurs, Negative Declaration should be issued. CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing was advertised in The Daily Report newspaper on October 30, 1981 and 17 public hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within 300' of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commis-ion conduct a public hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings of Staff, adoption of the attached Resolution with recommended Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Coimnunity Development JL:CJ:jr Attacnments: Exhibit "A" - "8" Vicinity Map Exhibit - Tract Map (4 Sheets) Exhibit " - Phasing Plan Exhibit "W - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "E" - Victoria Land Use Plan Exhibit Exhibit "F" "G" - Plot Plans (5 Sheets) - Conceptual Grading Plan (4 Sheets) Exhibit "H" - Unit Placement - 3,000 Square Foot Area Exhibit "I" - R.U. Storage Facility Part I, Initial Study Resolution of Approval w;th Conditions l � �ji rLi A LOMA Cuc;AlJl0NGA I 1WANDn. FONTI ANA c• 0 E VV NORTH CI'T'Y OF ITEM: RANCI -10 CUCA.1MONGA TITI.G Vicit4m( L`Up PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT. _6 — SCAI.E.��— E., x• i a y � A 4 a Y �r i XC>f d, {�O Q gE�bt =e�, C� tit ttM�sVL`Y�Y��y' t — i 0 �I b i� �I�I �I `d S� f' YJ++ �I 4 t 8 ap ny� 3� � a�a ss . .1 id I 4t 1 n, �I I �r V 'I w M Lao Y a z1 v �s Esc dp •T v��Ci f� 6 03 k �I�If \ �1 u I j�j �i r i NII 'V 4 11' i C �I r r U V � h cs3 F Dtq j�j �i r i NII 'V 4 11' i C �I r r U V � h cs3 X. �7 C � N N� V La >p�, i' u C �' u ilow� I IIm •1 '11• 1�ii \I : d" ....:,, El CITE' OF ITEM: C 9 RAINCI -10 CUCAiV ONGA TITLL::I- . . -rte-,- M PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT' --a SCALE: aU2S i � '/. ��'•�jj4i/.�:� 1111 ... I♦ C � N N� V La >p�, i' u C �' u ilow� I IIm •1 '11• 1�ii \I : d" ....:,, El CITE' OF ITEM: C 9 RAINCI -10 CUCAiV ONGA TITLL::I- . . -rte-,- M PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT' --a SCALE: aU2S 0 m �Q w . L8Y elr •LEC 'OLV i£Lb f SEG i .hrn it RS I V PLe 1 C£y to PC2G 1 .725 I . r ri V` �` 166 1 jr Ors £SC 92G GM: ,y alt P IIG j . IbG } 2SC AL2S .8� £IC 1 -0 CVG VG ICG l B2G l'LN i HG .AN /� YbC Eby We 6ZS 7 sr } CIC OW COG w£LC A 9LG CLG' Lu ✓✓✓YYY �� .� �� oft �EZec 1 �,£ 9 6 BL£ • \Q yeti fib, ,� /O N W LW Wj W ry ry� �b, A 1 W W ! ,h.I '0 _ • NOB } ' � 4 40 rU g 43 • \^ .. �- 597 112 \vT l �YO i � � �N yBG i,511�1 1597' 7,t91 @W 4). s 7 • � 5'27 1 N '.v 91 R 2BS 539 yh9 IA 595 t _ IBC P] 582 } � iM� .CAp �GJ7e d ITEM- C TITLE ;_I+�li 'FRS M�zn - EXHIBIT: , SG \LE- , . 1 %,m7 ` 4 cr-' S w" mwm vwm lo- IN= ZCJ W< N Ul w ui u� Mme\ �M 1� i 4 A 1• � 0 `J W71% E a _3 Ell j �r.EWk n1o1 c! n(r• n fvy�..r lx��;lie� r.�anc A /,/oclea� 3 sti i iyy l l.Hin3.%fy 9 /&AF. -C Or..r/ep.w./ Sc+Ldi /e /91.e�C ,rgDA /70 /Mr�i I i9bRf� /77 TENTATIVE TRACT 11934 wry 4 or 6 SIIF n _l • FORTH Crry OF Urim: G RANCHO CUCATMONGA TITLE:ILW, TEACI- RIPISIM PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALD N ?5 '/7 L IIIJ, G9 T . . . . . . .... SITE UTILIZATION AND NATURAL FEATURES MAP G9 Ell ITEN1. TITLE. �M InLIZATICPA FORTH EXI VIM -D __ SCALE: . . . . . . .... SITE UTILIZATION AND NATURAL FEATURES MAP TENTATIVE TRACT CITY BOUNOARY . ZONE BOUNCARY 0 TREES No 11 934 TRACT BOUNDARY - GOOD RADIUS --- DRAINAGE Ell ITEN1. TITLE. �M InLIZATICPA FORTH EXI VIM -D __ SCALE: w . •NIYIMrw �r�• 1 �� /.y��. '7', a"�� ' N, �• 1 -r..1 1 .�� '!'fir W W.. rr W ` I.�.%JS't�/j �* I'y; -.'� y, Uj4 ''. ,...IN (.fl'r�'� .�.�[•'��4 �, I . I r .. x _i �' W r� �, � t S( •` .mss �:. , , �.Q , f ..� e{ .:��, jp ♦��(/�/'y�w�r.N.: (, j.-I Ursa �t•.. .Tw.in _,�16...�. 1; 4N �1� ��L � ail •y.Y�' {/Nf�w, A.r...�� ,r{ �.L{ �tjay.,F � L�:�.'_.. d 2..11 :'.,�.w � � E •�y�9 1 •1 W i ^ `tea \\ �� r 14i: N .rS GT r"FW��.. -:: P. t .gyp• It .»Y r a� "'1 c r•ly' . � I � ' 7 Lw I w � "�fh.S�•NIF� -Q. ° r � Lr...�. :;. f � r! t�. �� I'!�'..,'rkwwrr�y ay �+ •• _ Mtx .n J'• 1 AMaW jj w �rPOrt�llrlOSllr f-y , y D ] VIN ` C ra ."' O �a` �Y (, 1 �. '�{ � �nnr. lr:.d �r k .• - •,',,'h_bcr•- wr ""°'�,...N..� � ..... y" PP NP Ir4:. .'��' PR '� ' •.J r�::�::: ® � •Ybi 1lwt.. nn 1 {,..rrw.. b � j i I, V •PR iIG IIP S I �f S� ��3'JV I $QIX 1 40P PC Lt -` I It En 1) t'21 a '�i�h � �{.PNDyi111iN� I��, 'IjyF MMYIiN °- 1, � •w y 1 fj� ..... � .»...... ' I ( ..S✓�h'• ccuuNrau. COMMU.IIIITy PLAN Victoria 1 A Planm3d Community in Rancho Cucamonga 1 CITE' OF ITEM: �- }�t`11�� HO CUCAA�®i�YC'A T1TLr2 Ac-:rcg)A f'Q �! _ PLANNING 1DIV!SION EximIT- SCA.LL': hIT�� 3000 S.F. LOT zoro- tot -tine tl njsoxcsi'u- �sidoyavxL= to, ,9sn;oppo5iusida RaajmsG /zfr, t / 'r L Jam: Ty� SLtbaclr6 30 ut, mind MaxlmxmGorauyes 60% gjaraL Mdunpropmffy4iw CITY OF .TE%1: G- �P RANCHO CUCA1V ONGA TITLE: UWE Mnm—d ins ' PLANNING DIVISION MiIBIT - Sager SCALE- 2n� � 625 5000 -6000 S.F. LOT canter plot R tv ,M; a Y Q V H Maxim coym96: 60% ffaruc >NrlumpmpazJr (sires CITY OF ITr:.1I: I , RA%CI 1O CLTCAlUlOi\'GA TITLE:"„ PLANNING DIVISICkN EXHIBIT- -jE_SCAL.E: 10 `:5i' T 3rP5 r 11 Ll S000 -6000 S.F. LOT zero -lot -line r?6aTcmi, PS ft, nttn =6 jcvil� Sfd{ejan4l Oft Oec sfdc /Lift Mfn,o afitcsoft Maz,�Kwn.Caver6a: 60°0" vfnreac t✓atk&Yp rtefliws CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMUNGA PLANNING DlVISICkN .a vz v ti h ITEM: _ f _ TITLE: TE'� -Lor- uaJ& --c2m4 L_tr re EXHIBIT- _SCALE: NTS sn�-T yes 7200— I UsUUU S.r. LU i centea plot Rawyard:15ft> "nnv 7!'f / vanJ s ;xurwt CITY r, 4 q T PLANNING DIVISICIN J• Sidcyasd: J ft mLxi+mwny tadr.,�idc :. V Qi htcLa" sim.Cove.- t: 5.5% aJ�csYl�wit�ti+r�ra�ocu,�ius ITE1-I: G TITLF,: C-e ?TRH - 7�L� EXHIBIT: F SCALE = M-C-5 Simi' '15 of S' r] C cri vvk iii}} y a z >� • wwe 3 � •I,a �. 1H i1d;:�• die P E n 4 • •�'i i � i F, $��J �ti ?yy��ojj8 �v��j��vcA� ♦cs.!� !I C a o 6 V� `'�••�y'40� j: l��Q oI C i E�.ln # y— 1 lay • � 4 U� n 1 i 1 e pit CITY OF ITEM- G 'GA TTLE= Ceg ltPtnt6 ANCi0 CLCAMO:� -a u PLAINNI \'G DIVISION EXH(131T: G SG1LE= ►h`+� sri•r�� r q W E CITY Y Oi, RANCHU CUCAMONGA PLANNII`�G DI�''ISIOV , r a �g 3. z �l e Q � a J �w� U .z w U �.. ITEM. � TITLE-- �tt>1,� wl L\I'IIBIT- _r2_ _ SCA LE- s41C -07' z cr- 4 L r�. Ell, �J Jl7W"K1 1J_ f) n '�aNI w -v 1 � I I W CITY OF ITEM: C- RAINCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: n�&14 PLANNING DIVISION E.\l-lllllT- e' SCAI.r- "5, l5tit�]GT 3 a= L¢ .n g�j r� _ _. _ CITY OF ITEM: C- RAINCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: n�&14 PLANNING DIVISION E.\l-lllllT- e' SCAI.r- "5, l5tit�]GT 3 a= L¢ CITY OF RA NCI -1O CI✓GkMONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITEM: C, TITLE :klh_ P1-/tN E\lillilT= -6--SCALE: N -m E u 11 CITY OAF RANCHO C,iJrCA V1O \T`VA. PLA.NNIN40 DIVISION C/ \ 1 FORTH ITEM: G TITLE: Rai UMI - Mnrx ,Q.k L EJ►.HII3 r- SCALE- NZ: _ 1 cnk= Z --------- - -4 CITY OF, RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION 11 711 W" NORTH I] ITEM: cf, TITLE- ILOMATIV9 FLxM I- wit mwo EXHIBIT: 14 SCALE- HT5 .st-P:�7' 7--a= 2, L .I 7 t F U 'T fy E M' 1 A 1.1 D U S E l &0 Flt I --- I ¢E� VcFF1�A.6 STOpP�roE Pot- 3q $IV's p 411 xI� —Fx+f i -- i /'�eNr.E o�.� Au, sip55 FOI2 s !c z-VIL" ^'Act ScF- ffStjwGp T. I _ 'ft� DA`1 CPFiEI� 81� 1 ) CIT`i Oh ITEX1: RANCI -10 CUCAMONGA TI"I•I_r: i?,- y PLANNINNG DIVISION LX 1IBIT: I SCAL.E= N S NORTH 0 CITY OF RA1 010 CUCA?SONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committe& through the department vinere the Project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Envircnnental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Stu�y_ The Development Review Committee will meet and ta;ce action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which ti- .1e the Project is to be heard. The Comwnittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no envircnmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed., 2) The project will have an Environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: VICTORIA WINDROWS VILLAGE APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: The William L (714) 980 -22 NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Co.) (7141 080 -2244, I3 Inc.) (7.i4) 641 -8777 1730 OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED Gary Frye (The William Lyon 9h H. Foreman Jr_ (Hall Foreman, LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS A North of Baseline Avenue, south of H ASSESSOR PARCEL NO,) _ land Avenue, and west of Etiwanda Avenue LIST OTHER PERAIITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Various Citj and County permits to be issued during con- struction. such as grading building plumbing, etc. I -f PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This application deals with 759 proposed lots within the Victoria Windrows Vi7.lage, a Community. For a�.iC3 iption see Exhibit "A ". ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF P?QY: 192:± acres of land. DESCRIBE THE E? QVIROIC?IZ,*1TAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOR.1- 14TION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIRALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL" OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF MY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) Please reference the Environmental Impact Report for VICTORIA PLANNED C014MUNITY II, by K A Reynolds AICP, as certified by the Citv Council Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- Of cumulative acl:ions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? a �_atic a vdzL Ur Victoria a planned community. Please reference the above noted EIR. "' WILL TI?IS PPOJECT: YES NO x 1. Create a substantial change in ground contoars? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? _X _ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire-, water, sewage, etc.)? x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? N/A Y. 6. Create the need for use or disposal. of potentially hazardous materials such as tonic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above; In terms of tree removal, please refer to the aforementioned EIR 3MP^iRTAJT; If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete- the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION; I her,:,by certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additio-.�? information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be maLe WheDelopment Review Committee. Date_ May 20, 1981 Signature Title _Regional Manager 11 EXHIBIT "A" In the City of Rancho Cucamonga„ County of San Bernardino, State Of California, Being a subdivision of a portion of Blocks I and J of the Etiwanda Colony Land, as per map recorded in Book 2 of Maps, Page 24 and a portion of the northwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 1, north, Range 6 west of the San Bernardino Base and Meridian and a portion of Lots 1 -6 of the Orange Empire Acres, as per map recorded in Book 20 of Maps, Page 1, all of San Bernardino County. n 7) CONSTr,T` ° "' T 1C 10110:•71 1 in_f or,ation P.anning Divi should be prcvided 'to the City of Rancho Cucamonga sion in order to aid in assessing the ability of the S :hool district to accon;,ogete the proposed residential develop:,lent. N..nc of Developer znd Tentative T= � . ac No.: Tire William Lron Co:/'Ip.1t, Tact �I934 S;ecific Location of firoject: North of Baseline Ave. Ave. and west of Etiwanda Ave . south of Highland • N: ® RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11934 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11934, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The William Lyon Company, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as tract subdivision on 19" acres of land within the Victoria Planned Community located north of Base Line Road, south of Highland Avenue, and west of Etiwanda Avenue into 756 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on November 10, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth it the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11934 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with ii any easement acquired '-y the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within j� the proposed subdivision. 1 Resolution No. Page 3 10. Units within the 3000 square foot area may include a variety of housing types and designs, such as attached units, zero lot line, and center plot units, combined driveways and side entry garages. 11. Recreational vehicle parking shall be provided for 25% of the 3000 square foot lots. The location, size, design, screening and land :aping of the proposed temporary parking area shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval. Also, a master plan for the permanent iocat m(s) of R.V. parking areas shall be completed within 2 years and shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval. 12. Each park area within each village shall be dedicated to the City in a complete form including, but not limited to, installed parking areas, seeded play areas, landscaping and irrigation, sidewalks, lighting, and restrooms i101hr CXX wv-^'4 to the construction of greater than 200 dwelling units of the lots within the village. Park design shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services and consistent with the Victoria Planned Communities and reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. ENGINEERING DIVISION 13. Highland Avenue shall have 44' wide pavement (curb to curb distance) with 7' half width future median island at the north. The north curb shall be straight curb and the south side shall have a 4' wide concrete gutter (bike lane). 14. Construction of the missing improvements on Highland Avenue including, but not limited to curb, gutter and A.C. pavement across Edison Company's easement west of the project boundary shall be required. 15. Full width street improvements (curb on curb) shall be constructed on Highland Avenue across Casaletti's Polka Palace. Necessary onsite improvements feathering to match the street grade shall be required. 16. Highland Avenue from Street "K" westward shall be re- designed and reconstructed so as to provide a positive flood barrier for the project area and to divert all flood waters around the tract area. 17. All designs and constructions of Highland Avenue shall meet the requirements of CalTrans and approval from Cal - Trans shall be required prior to recordation of the tract. I Ell- Resolution No. Page 2 N That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11934, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The Planning Commission shall approve the final placement of all units withi-i the subdivision, and shall have the descretion to adjust lot lines, and if needed, eliminate lots. 2. The developer shall install W landscaping end fences on lots 617 and 516 along th ouble cul -de -sac. The precise deisgn shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee. 3. The design of lots 451,452 and 453 shall be revised to eliminate 1 A wil�en 45'2 and 453 to- pr&Yide r ri ways. 4. Flag lot designs will require close review by the Design Review Committee and may require such things as combined driveways and installation of landscaping and irrigation by the developer. 5. Street "A" at the northwest corner of the project shall be --urved slightly to reduce the impact of a long straight street. The final design shall be reviewed and approved the the Design Review Committee. Screening techniques shall be untilized to buffer homes surrounding the Polka Palace property. ii*bM! e MI-0, .. . 7. Landscaping adequate to screen the perimeter wall on Highland Avenue shall be provided by the developer subject ti Design Review Committee approval. Details shall be shown in Oe design review package. 8. The materials and construction methods used on all street side fences and fences along the Edison right - of -way shall be approved by the Design Review Committee. 9. All standard requirements of the Foothill Fire Protection District shall be complied with, particularly in regards to the maximum length of cul -de -sacs and provisions for secondary access. 11 Resolution No. Page 4 18. The design of the Victoria Parkway shall be based on the following criteria: a. Design speed 45 MPH: b. Minimum horizontal curve radius shall be 6.530 feet at the centerline of the travel lane; c. Minimum pavement section shall be 3" A.C. ove! 40 Aggregate Base. Actual section shall be dete d from k -value test. d. No nuisance water shall be allowed to flc.i through or across the pavement section. e. Properly designed edger along the edge of the pavement shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Citv Engineer. f. Intersection details shall be approved by the City Engineer and shall be designed such th t necessary sight distance i!: maintained and vehicular turning movement conflicts are avoided. 19. Design of Base Line Road intersection shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to submittal of final improvement plans. 20. Design of Victoria Parkway undercrossing across Southern Pacific Rail Road shall be approved by the Railroad Company and the City Engineer prior to recordation of the maps. 21. All local streets may be designed with 6" curb face. The loop street 'T.' shall have 8" curb face. 22. Where sidevalk is�ad. cent to the curb, the width df the sidewalk shall b ��5!/Ceet wide measured from the face of the curb. 23. Plans of all non standard street sections shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to preparation of improvement plans. After approval, the applicant's Engineer shall submit to the City a suitable reproducible of those plans suitable for incorporation into City Standard plans. E Resolution No. Page 5 24. Construction.of an .adequate concrete lined diversion channel (master planned storm drain Line I) to intercept runoff from the water course at Highland Avenue shall be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The channel shall have the capacity to convey 100 -year fre- quency storm runoff with 25% bulking factor without any freeboard. Adequate inlet and outlet structures shall also be provided. The locations of the terminus of the channel and the method of discharge shall be as determined or approved by the City Engineer from one of the following alternate designs: a. The terminus at a retention basin located at west of Edison corridor, south of Base Line Road (parcel owned by the applicant) with a regulated outflow connection to Day Creek channel. This will require approval by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District. b. The terminus as above with the outflow as a sheet overflow to the property at south of the basin. This requires a flowage easement from the property owners to the south. c. The terminus at the proposed retention basin at south of Base Line Road. The channel to be aligned along the future Day Creek Boulevard with Day Creek Boulevard being rough graded to accept overflow from the channel. 25. The following design criteria for the proposed storm drain (Line H) along easterly tract boundary shall be used: a. Unless otherwise mentioned, the proposed drain shall convey 25 -year frequency storm runoff. b. Offsite runoff from the drainage area north of Highland Avenue as shown on the master plan shall be conveyed through the pipe. c. An adequate inlet structure and a debris basin at an appropriate location shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. n Resolution No. Page 6 d. The storm drain in Victoria Parkway shall be designed to carry 100 -year frequency storm. A suitable al- ternative to this criteria nay be acceptable to the City Engineer provided that the applicant's Engineer submits all calculations necessary to show that no erosion or damage to the pavement or the parkways will take place and the proposed, rai I road undercross i ng will remain open to vehicular traffic during heavy storm. e. The combinea capacity of all street right -of -way and the storm drain shall be capable of handling 100 -year storm runoff, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 26. A drainage retention basin shall be constructed south of Base Line Road to the satisfaction of the City Engineer for the storm discharge from the proposed drain line I and for line H, if required. The basin shall be designed per City approved "Drainage Retention Basin Criteria" for Day and Etiwanda Creek Drainage pian, and the discharge from the basin shall be limited to the predevelopment runoff quantities. Metered outlet pipe or structure shall be constructed to drain the basin directly to the existing channel along Devore Freeway with a regulated flow. Pro- visions shall be made to prevent erosion and debris depo- sition from the outflow of the basin. 2;_ The storm drainage fee for the project shall be credited towards the cost of constructing the adopted Master Plan drains. 26. The applicant shall participate in and contribute to the construction of Day Creek channel when necessary mechanism to construct the same is formulated. 29. Construction of necessary flood protection measures to the satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be required to protect the project area from overflow of Day Creek, channel and probable breakage of Day Creek levee including, but not limited to the following: a. Construction of necessary grading, berms, eetention of diversion channel shall be required at north of Highland Avenue, west. of Street "K" to provide a positive flood protection from the flood waters entering the project area through the access road and rerouting the same westerly around the project boundary. The design of such measures shall meet the requirements of Callrans and shall be approved by the City Engineer and CaiTrans prior to recordation of the tract. 11 Resolution No. Page 7 b. A 6' high flood protection wall along Highland Avenue and along the diversion channel from Street "K" to west tract boundary shall be constructed. The footing of the wall shall be below the top of curb elevations and the height of the wall shall be measured from top of the proposed berm. The berm along the wall facing Highland Avenue shall be flattened to 4:1 slope to reduce the possibility of flood waters jumping the wall. c. A 6' high combination of wall and berm shall be constructed along Highland Avenue for the rest of the project boundary. d. A 8' high masonary wall with 6' over natural ground shall be constructed along west tract boundary from Street "J" to north tract boundary and from Street "JJJ" to south tract boundary. An engineered earthen berm (4' high and 10' wide at top) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be constructed connecting these two walls. A secondary berm (6' high G 10' wide at top) from Street "JJJ" extending northeasterly to street "R" north of Victoria Parkway shall also be required. A drainage ditch approximately 2' deep and 5' from the wall or the toe of the berm shall be pro- vided to divert flood waters away from the berms. Necessary construction easements will be required where work is required off -site. Alternate protection by excavation within Day Creek Boulevard if equival- ent to the foregoing measures. 30. A separate landscaping and lighting district shall be formed for the entire Victoria planned community. 31. TheM4r9`perimeter street parkways,�re required to to be annexed to that landscaping and lighting district: a. Park area b. Open Space trail area c. Highland Avenue d. Victoria Parkway e. Loop street "R" 32. Prior to recordation of the tract, the design of the open space trail area and the loop street parkway and sidewalk design shall be approved by the City Engineer. The design shall incorporate such features that the maintenance area and the cost of future maintenance is minimized. Resolution No. Page 8 33. The applicant shall provide a maintenance guarantee bind for a period of one year from the date Of the areas to the Maintenance District. approval must 3q. Prior to recordation of the map, necessary pp- f received from frontage alongdHighland Avenueeand of ive future freeway Cal - the re uir d dedication theherignment,sifwrequired bynCal- map. wills necessitates submittal oftarrevisedetentative mapafor Tran, which that portion of the phasing for City's approval. outside the tract boundaries for the following improvements 34. Prior to recordation of the map, the necessary easements shall be dedicated to the City by separate instrument- a. Inlet structures north of Highland Avenue for the storm drain lines I & H. easee h. Diversion c�reeklBoulevard, ifnrequifredi. and along future Day c. For the storm drain (I) south of Base Line. d. Highland Avenue across Edison easement. e. A temporary easement for the proposed retention basin with outfall structures at south of Base Line. This easement shall be vacated after the master p lan of storm drain system and Day Creek channel improvement is completed. f. Along Edison easement for flood protection measures. wide local streets shall be minimum of 6' wide. 35. The Public Utility Easements behind sidewalks along 44 36. Drainage and Utility easement across open space connecting streets "III" and "CCC" and Streets "CCC" to Victori "ark - way. 37. The proposed driveway ease °ent along lots 634, 635 and lots the 651, 6A3C•C99& R1G and those lots shall or H meowner`'sed by on Associatiohaforbthose toed w�thfitheamapfaction of the City Attorney 5. E Resolution No. Pape 9 38. Street vacation required for the following streets within the project boundary: a. Railroad Avenue north b. Victoria Street c. Hanley Avenue 39. Noise attenuation wall (masonry wall) shall be constructed along the entire length of the common boundary between Southern Pacific Railroad and the tentative tract. 40. Prior to recordation of any tract all off -site and on -site improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer. 41. Prior to issuance of occupancy permit for any dwelling units the following improvement work shall be completed and accepted by the City in addition to all off -site improvements for the particular phase of development: a. Highland Avenue construction including all flood protection measures as mentioned herein al)ove. b. Flood protection wall and berms along west tract boundary. c. Diversion channel (line I). d. Storm drain Line ri from Highland Avenue to proposed retention basin, including the retention basin. e. Major access road from Base Line or Highland Avenue to the phase boundary with an emergency access pro- vision to Highland Avenue or Base Line Road. 42. Lots 633, 654, and 698 shall be designated as a mini -park area. Necessary park improvements with a Tiny Tot Lot shall be provided per City Standard. The required drain- age and utility easements shall be located within this open space area. 43. Prior to recordation of the first phase subdivision, a map or other legal documents to the satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be recorded to prevent creation of unrecognized parcels. E Resolution No. Page 1.0 44. Clustered mail boxes to be installed behind sidewalks, shall meet the requirements and approval of U.S. Postal Service. 45. All rights of vehicular access shall be dedicated as follows: a. Along Highland Avenue except at street access locations. b. Along Victoria Parkway from Southern Pacific Railroad to west tract boundary except at street access locations and at lots 759, 760. c. Along street "K" and along west sid- of Street "P" except at Street .ccess location. d. Along all lot lines contiguous to Street "R" except for lots 451, 452, 758 and 760. e. Along north side of Street "J" except at Street access location. f. Along lo's 741 and 745 contiguous to Street "JJJ ". APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, C airman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November, 1981, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT. COMMISSIONERS: 7 ? w — V O 110 L W •e N « V O C U� •O u G 4 u p V L U V C T � O L 4L y y Vi `• W 1- N L pL y ° 1 yyJ -� uL N .i✓ a i✓ N d` =r c i 2 •ter •.r L N NC,0. r N ldW4 b SO G tt w Y •- �v Wy na. sl v c N.`^i:w f' u✓ It "'r,<,", tJ t °W LO 44 u ^ y V dN •Ca.u� W A N..- a✓i9° Y qLL al.J .° a +•Ln yiV NV VA • j i TOtP O ` W�a•L >'(; A Wn� n`o •�• c o 4 �I'c v N Y a „C s �`+ •^ o L .J 7W -V ._ OJ N ur W =n )LnG CO V- WAr Oyu �r r� nG1 mA 'l �i d- >• yL `�4GX O� v�u' 4y•^C WO uriY p4 v� G T.- V .J V N V m V Y M .� O O •J N •ri�i .-- VL w 'n V O N •C 1'r -A-Y q� G:y q L° qC 1d W -•- CS LL1`V AL T� •�✓ -k �a Lw Gy•� C _ J Y V �b Ny L✓ q- •- u Y L �• ° ou T L v dI � •L .N W � M L P V � N " Y} � qO Cy s ._ a .oL vn � �: �T✓ iE N u o..a y G r✓y n. 11...... EC 1 I WC N9 ✓J uC wLC Vim° ,y O> r CJ q •G•J aO L r� � 4 i i G, y � N • y.0 V � n ✓ C-. C4 .w- P !J T Nl N C [� Y. ✓ V'U + W T W Ci �C N V u aNN LO O_,n LAC ° � W •� .n Ys N�> gv W.Lglc t`JC� o i an o� a14 a` d T c g c •O ••" q - V L t IT Y. N � � U uN •ui•u OL .� _4V W 0. A �'•^ VnC1 -^ APi 011 NOV 0 -0 A w; �� N4 O`a � WEB O� •O b✓ qAV b N O < VN •• V r N y � u .^ � W l� 1 N .. W O N L r u V .O- a 6� y •� C Y� N 41: u• y •• a� G, �• S M U C ✓C— Pw-u O J q i.�y NU N M V O u• N C _ W v i� �o � c `n o. � .✓. C L L N T 4 p. W. C" ✓ V r O, 4 u u V N N C C > n L L ^ •� w � a, o. I 'r y• ,J ,+�-� Nm vn� Nyon m v �1: oc - TEc. rzNC �= •4i�c ✓ L•O+ nC L ` u mow• N: ..� `✓ V V b V u NI �� - V =mac`^ uV°.+N vl 40 a M \JIB C m .. w G V N Y O c u L d V C•� fl>, N O_ q N T 1 C •_ PE G 4 q V 'O N L It, a .o...r Y� T ✓ ar > (u O 4 u N y 'C L •^_ O JJ L i LL — H ✓ N • ` N V J T�C •., q O O A < N ub N n 4 4C ILV W ¢N•G -u C C^ � OHO � •. n �O q r lJ c .• L Y• � �C d J < O N u• .: •Oi• r L ti O O :; .- w' '' Vl «� «W « N C 4 �i y>.O « •pw V =01 it'YL� W O w u _'r O V i n b OL✓ (_ u .+ V .. � r.. � G V� G V O V „V '•' 'J n1�� e..r'•. '^ V I_J a wC 1II n « ( .. .J N ✓ i ° ^ ° O i al t .Y � ^ � „ ✓ ✓ w IK w v u i !aC p ^ n i « o �•� �^ 7 J V` N U W � I L �V V y •.'l 'J i i .4 l «� L^ j p 1 � u 1 O N v N « y ° tr w u• u O.m cw L ..' ''_ _ L' •v n n .n 7 ✓J V 4 ° � C ` L ` P N fJ _ . 1 � '� . r Y' n " c V a L L <7 n � l n O, u G N •-• O y .- Y m „ V j` N P U rr ^ L y (n V' O y yr L V n! 7 O V w ✓ G O. (� I f a 1. 1] �. V rlr ` U N V ru n[ ..0 _^ i -� � �✓ .a I� L V y C IF u � u L', G.' y W ..� u 1) � O n O N l d ` ; u t. � ._ •-. �. `J � W V a y) V tl (Y � C u.O = V N � V Y` nom° nWO Unu n � 4' .V' ^ 7r—tsV 'VI ` P ✓ uFV � -r`u6l V�Oi;Z j ^�VVI O U ^ n L u C O n d ^` O LL + K C� rr •N L W O✓ y C j O V 2 a• } V t. V l:4 V W 6 � •ti u' T. W i 0 O .- 4/ r « n � L r 1 Q v .n ✓ � 1 >•.� Jt J � , � d La (. W is C°r'� Q N ti aJ v` i) N' (J 1_? w ur N ` '_ _ _ ° � ' ✓ IJ H N Q U p O- � Q Fu 1...4m VrV LLL�O V .mil 0 W V p u` • L c� yu ova � �r ur o' � -.m✓ ° ,v n u N vY n °° « nrLiru F•-. +�L l'l '� i_t'J _�V VC CJ b VV W �u T) ul -' OL LTC YL i uV• uVe. l4 ✓ u W, N q 1- � � J V N •i u b rY N C ^ O yO. L L W° N ra ^ 'i l I�' d O rL Qq «V •.( -' ILirym .0 .-.. y V C6 t0 IL. .- V V' •y G✓ N Wv•'i� ul ip% n�Ne.nl u.Vw (V �l y (y LV W w ✓> lLW •'p w nUV C I,.N ; �« n O C� `) L. W l' O u u r_ nl D N P V O W O• ✓ .^O I b �- '.a I N y' 4. «= l r (J• (nT y L ` W C � .rN. • u) ` � N N rr V N L } ar_i � r JJ :r C 4 u � .+ -J L _O ^ 4 C O u Idjr •� O 'p L u V` ` O Y u N ^ T (� L 1 G n y O 2 V < U TJ lY G� y •C G L` d u i '.1(- •^ = � L° .� ... (: O u 'n w V n rn N A m ei c n° ai i °uc' r^Ir�o IJU c "' ^e!ocvs °✓ __ u VC ^ y.o N ✓b � .y[W yG L'u •� l: ...V l -O ui Nu It L) b L ? y N y i y l n J O O V V u ''. T «tr r �/« �' 1] +✓ N O u C l' V' <✓ J C O V V �- OV .J � i YN ^il u' `-J�WUJJ '^4u�I .UV �L Wt)a. -a•,. :n C' '�.b napi u x .•�� rnGS. v. t. cuv�`�v °''n °`> CN -'b °'_ n y N ci i)' o N NM t-o Lu Lnr 1_� a✓ V M .. _., � L.� _ ^ �..W.✓ P I[^ u n' YL u^ lu Gu'n � ) VI r_ V�G•F+y( °C VN y uC v C j LLr ° .`'iL «L rrLq`p O)u ^ OC V'� VVb•au -' n, W � a �L' N c 1 N.b, uL•J .°. ^ � JGJ P °i'`on G, °w t:c u i � N... n9 :o r�on Su 2 � < n N �yN vry L -Wnbc [�1 �.' �^ NTJ dJ �,ci_i v._✓ o no d N u W 1lI L M <I N` u> ^ rJ V d✓ n` C J^ V' W F N 'T b U 1✓ O K O J Vj O V 4 m v ° -L ii � w u^ ^ }^ uo „ru n: °,) e.. -v .`.b In T�- c_.-.y o..r .d•� -w� `� V Y ... V t N r L N .. L C' N N u O V L 9 u u IJ V • 2 Lui ` .J N p A V T N P N > CC[' uv+ �C 4'4'yn.I ✓fn N N ^^ bV 'nN LL VNU.u..In cL °_ G i LL .u' l'v. ^ ✓ w N O � Y� C •fJJ � ✓ V F .- �' � E_' V n G O n C V L L ^r . j✓. J p n v M wL. n T I P?O n! (J N UVy xN O `G PPy ... N... N fJ 'V t• Jvt.r�.4 n'Ja� � '1L w ° O V W ^ tt � FW,i .� '" O O t u � C' ur C <) ° ^ V_ (^ n L .t`.• u ° WOW t Q % O ... N'• ° ' '^" € ''LI'' v i � � n .� �J,. LLr .. 4 In TIr I, U QO Wd V(TU«l ✓ JN C „� ^Y ^`.w -�C1V �'l ✓ � f: O N NO V K Vr 6 V K ll p n .Cir a. B U G K �• O ^ I I N •w � C`' 0 N u N ' _ �.� C 1. ✓ \ .r n .- •. N o °m N c In 'p<-•v L- fT f � t• c ? ` Y! � -. V U fi A ✓ cr F 4•!' c L 'vr �. .n N d C r+ W 6 < " u ��II 9 C f. c _ ._ V l � ` •'• L N b V � fC n q > .� .°_ t ✓ .r _ � V u. 4 � o cL C ? q° � i� `.r W n. m i n >. o✓ U- u c n i a u W Y r. � V b V r G �!` v 4 _ : P� : W �• .n ° •Lil _ .. ._ _ .:. Y :- CJ •• - t �� I LL N� f !1i V L V 0 L =r �] L ✓ �. O T .� ^ ,l C N C.� W u n -- — NL. °�. v`r �Wrt, vN°. V. cNU 1 >. i. J.) a'J qc .� W �n r^L.•� yJ? V f ✓ V �� L T .n L i I. y O T _ G: vT .1 y C, .r V P ml ✓ ._ ' V' c: O l W •� O 4✓ u� ✓ C �r.V _[ °c _ ii- � c.-, `✓° �ar .: c "' Nn° ...`o i_.. _ L °1 I �'�` i11 wT T .ln F, vi v� O u N U w A V •L• N L u L �y _.r 4, — A N � .°F i''1 O �> I� ✓1 C L i U •y y O .. '� W_ 0 O✓ 1. N ,� q W n� 1 _ C C Gl � V �� „!r I L G V 1. L V_ _ V V N d N U u V •.•. J .) � :. u� Y 1r T w. r T u L !� \ 4N Nn... WLLONyr .f L ° Vt V V „' Cr N L N U 9 U Ei f yr M1' LL� rV- N A N 4 u V V lL w A .n t •Y (� r✓ T r 4 N^ 11 N q A u✓ wlr0 •.-. JJ >' LL•_ LP � l: V U � U •] O °q� �U q _✓n u n u u� Y q.. . uq .uN l4q d ✓ r` ✓ N •w �J S' q A �, [> .... f li : A• LL r O, Q u O C P fJ r .- yi [. � • N •n ` J 1] ) `•r V L L P G .- � r 'I N l T u, C. [. L. Cr 1 V N •n O <.' O _ •. °i V n, LEI U N' w] +° .. L w• F > U n .�^ y u ^ V L> V ✓r U � 4 V L V u V u 4 LL V� e[ 1n V ur N V) `r N I N }� ✓ ur I p O• � Y L O. �^ A ° u .r '.. u LL O �.. O. n •1. V .i w-t°i KVr K m � V ur .L A p V C W H �i O [. Cir w ^•' � ii C I V Cq .YOU -.1 V \J N l'V u ^ tz N ..L✓b._ °L: Y.. p . -oc v bw �nnN mc.0 c c L 6 J` t V '- CI •- i N w - V N O a V g C' r1 V •rtfi •n � O�V • q L >. rYir v 6 � Y U In '-vu Nu Il O L N ... V O ° Ud V Vu _ nJ c•b ` V u _ U] W ... ._ O G C rVir V ✓ L d u N [" ✓ y i L A L- _ `J a. N L W• LL ._ _ U 4- A L L C •_ F r.`_ y N } ^ G :n y N ..•1JU YI ✓u C ..O-C W4 Viy L .Oi �•_ LVU ^uL V`V.^ ✓90V YY TU Z .VA VWW NA >�i V•Irgp u �"y 6'GC V`r O LL> q F- '• - L k L rN V L Li `• C f " aJ • t t 4u yYLO ✓'�.0 fLL C_O� NO.N W ✓V LLy Nu WWTJ N�WLL `•^ y•J .1 L. f:'�C �_ L _ q y=i .N. f� v V N N n _.. i i °• q ^4 N g W W w .� V V� y U L 7 C L r-r J° u A O^ q (y nl > ; N d ti _.� L v V LL q L i t V q r L •- r O Y U V : J W- ?Jyo n('J.n Lt;c A✓n =v �)-' mloJC r'n�d LL LNO .ua0. �].-w- V V•_ V✓(r uJ O. V- N lJ cY C.Ni y� WNLLN TtSCV' bmf✓ LOUT NPN LL • T U •V W_ ` OA � GL q wyy' <) _ C G >. d W C. W LO _ C U N l) y1 ✓ l U _uV VQ?OL TJ� OtJw4 NP Y qnb Nq 'r. .�A WYJ WPyV ✓ O In VV N1) o ��.:uN cu•- Ni A•_o �5c uoq N "N r L 1, k Lq u✓ w� nL°i T c� wo.v - Ln�r cL rn ✓v✓ `] o b Na A 1. 9 L ._i w N �•� 1. • .L •^- U l P U C �/ P i• u O !1 6C N ^) N u C b ._ 7 'r r` ^ V V C r f_�uu✓ ^ ._ C 1 O n._ w C iJ ^ L 4 A w W T r q Lr O r O •1 9 r w. Cr .J L L. u ..• y 4 Y N1 - p .0 V •n i •n _ L C EV) C y G` Y N a 4 ° to.— L l N u _ �• E ?2y ✓ °XN.n TV uLwL N �� = VGa .r U.N.W N ^uv t' ar ._Y.J � .n Jy yN ✓ �... AN„ Y ._✓WV •L . -`�::C :1N9 (O ✓ �'_ u u .n._ L �� {C--O ^ _V ✓r nr lL w]vr q ✓..0. X4i:�A ^.^u °T U'.V A ._6 _..•MN .0 r C. ✓q tl N .' 'o E'b•- v•�C• -rnrr - cN 4 °N V VC a✓ N _ LqV :)mNN N .. 1_ Vq TC C%• In L p V^ 4 N N O.•[ C A •u u N \. •°'j u F �i.R ^ LL +u d U r ." N .. W r^ a �-J fJ rn N u L In f. � V ^J ✓ C. � A i�f A09L.9V� �OSry >� ✓` :L nu q'i uoV r°cya «in'� c L u .N 1 _. rY i« •-N'" i Ire ::c-�4 F� �� Ltq �c u4 Z; N °f.... rr ✓_�yr OV fJ W pC u_ r/JTO ✓NVf_V ull y° n rn_ N U; CL [• -,0C JN N T =ON Lr-.^ I.: V ^y N u� • �'{ -� wY N. V \. •.._._. -. L ;{rte Cl -T _ Jr fOJLGV�y CI LuCC �VLL ] aj� L•C q4 ••°•NJ� O�•N ^N LN r♦ •'•� Oq 2t+uU Lp L. y > l- •�•' -7 Luu N ^ FJ O V. 4. JVLU R9 V.VV G]y I Oc c U r k O V ° 4 C V V V n C 2 L by V O n jLj Y..n �• N ^n z 1 'J C' V N tr O l V L [n „ O O A C" c `J 4� W ^ L ; C rn W C V L V V N iy j N W L•'u L n� r a � •Jp _ L C lJ c ar W V l V W b ✓ V b O u p C •• = n � u O m l�r4ir L C O d C O ✓ C l V V U � Y T !J C J 1 ` G l ^ G of x V V (L P V LL ` rt V V l n W V L O 4 V C'W ✓ 'r Nf- V V = c v C b C L = •L Tu l - (n �J G Wrl_ � ✓O 4 j .rr O J y C O GZ� LL ° RI u V V L r`J JW Y ` ^ C •- D S 7 u U O P O L V a O a A rt N L C' U 1- Viu ♦ +rV' u ` G« l7 V L J .+ C t V. V 4 N Y V L i V ✓ rn `✓ w• •L i 0 4 L W n 4� 3 V V rY J t u L u Lr l� V V �o R� •r y L L V ^ C u• 1 U Ni V V L N O •V N V Ln [' ✓ b You y� V W v V c. P u W ^ T W c 4` T V \V V V b l Y O� O U W u L 1. u V � TW JJY 4 rr• L �rnl 'J � V C _ •r Vr (i• y Iz ^ N. C V 4 m R� L f d [1 ♦♦ b N rL T �• L 3� LL J L N W V y {� L { U S C L- V V lJ i� V to lJ C V V L R� fn u W u r A V L S nc ^ C �k W ^ + U �. rn V T V V L 1 v 1 4 . L � U M V u e C b O C C 4 � r rY m u c U � V 4 L N •Lm W c V V ,c u rr' .' ✓ n CP C W V y m C rY IIIL n ^ Z V m O C L' = V rn l A (•• A N V i ♦' IC] � N T.rr .Y W u M W L L 4 '- �• Cn V CI n� _ ru n �Y ✓Aa use oG �c ° `u IV .00 Wu vE♦�u rrii u:aZMV rw �LL♦.� PO �wV% VL- Rr C' •1 C m Y T 4y rJ l ( ✓ 4 V _ Ln P C^ C" n Q•N ClV r W " 9^ N PA .u.. t Y ° .•� .♦ QV✓ 6 iC WY UJu ` (Q [� m P • f •1- C'W ✓ 'r Nf- V V = c v C b C L = •L Tu l - (n �J G Wrl_ � ✓O 4 j .rr O J y C O GZ� LL ° RI u V V L r`J JW Y ` ^ C •- D S 7 u U O P O L V a O a A rt N L C' U 1- Viu ♦ +rV' u ` G« l7 V L J .+ C t V. V 4 N Y V L i V ✓ rn `✓ w• •L i 0 4 L W n 4� 3 V V rY J t u L u Lr l� V V �o R� •r y L L V ^ C u• 1 U Ni V V L N O •V N V Ln [' ✓ b You y� V W v V c. P u W ^ T W c 4` T V \V V V b l Y O� O U W u L 1. u V � TW JJY 4 rr• L �rnl 'J � V C _ •r Vr (i• y Iz ^ N. C V 4 m R� L f d [1 ♦♦ b N rL T �• L 3� LL J L N W V y {� L { U S C L- V V lJ i� V to lJ C V V L R� fn u W u r A V L S nc ^ C �k W ^ + U �. rn V T V V L 1 v 1 4 . L � U M V u e C b O C C 4 � r rY m u c U � V 4 L N •Lm W c V V ,c e V i ♦' IC] � T.rr .Y W u c C L n� _ N PO �wV% VL- Rr !♦'CAN Ln P C^ C" LVVu ClV r O a c _L i'.L •n u rV 4 .+ •'ni, c a+ r 6 V n i) q ll t r ^b u 1 `^ ^. \ L L w) _ 9.'^ L V 1. 4 L. l U rn ✓ n [Lj ` p .• JJJ 'l tl p4N 1„FfO Vn <C 4^ a _ V C 1 +y r. `�P -� �C o ✓� �^ o Y u .. � '^ S L L.m w r L o�rn L x 7 ._"__, G L. ` �� O Nut✓.. �� O a �n r_ ` C U Y� N l' _ � �) U ! F V ✓ � W ° ♦ 1nn1 � ` 'L C V L' L' L G a G ♦` 'L `.� N b ♦_ ^ u N r_ V N ` • �. .. ✓ u W N rt 1' J [n 4 y ^ .�' l •ca V V ;} � � L L• l .+ 4 4 uYiV NL,.nv �L Vr00.� ♦SV '� ^ V G ✓ N ri j � W W ~ � Y • • • e a ti V V a 6 0 yyO O V b V v 0 Iz V C SO L L C N q 1O N u Y r q q r r � O 'J ✓ 9Y O q C {dv O D L • � pG L y N P > J • VW� q W: O ` C j O J ? 9 O N u Z C V q VL p C W 0 •L �M . N O • F f: C_ f' � J V w T N G O^ L N N ` v p L A. c cu G GT Lr i c o � } O u .2 Cu pS�W LCC L 7 4�L J' I 1 I �^Wl :L ,Jry1 1 !O N a. i O G C V L ry � o O �• N G u O � T W `O O W � l p ry W L U U ` O = C T 7 N.-u V N V L o c. NL L•..+ � ul ` VvoNC V=• 4 I� I 1 al I • w � O G C V L ry � D O �• G u � T W U9 N.-u V N V N N L•..+ � O ` n= m v b ��N V uW L Orirry� W�u N G «� N �Lp V W N V'•' L�Uu CLC V O¢ q uO.O..y O.V ONr •eT .0 0u9 di dVV SM n b OC�C .�• N p G •.. W Y V ,in^ N V V'r TV `O�u u NW �4in pO C =� N V Ll J W w1 u U� L •p y O •� V a r. n a n a.J �-o ¢I1� �•L E .:] Ll CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STUFF REPORT DATE: November 10, 1981 TO: Member- of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack. Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DRAFT EIR ON REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ABSTRACT: The Planning Commission will be holding a public hearing in order to attain public input on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Redevelopment Plan. BACKGROUND: In order for the City to asse're adequate compliance with all public input requirements on the Redevelopment Plan, it is neces- sary for the Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing to receive input on the Draft Environmental Impact Report to the Redevelopment Plan. Insofar as the Redevelopment Plan is an extension of the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan for the area, the Draft EIR borrows heavily from the reports prepared on the earlier documents. Attached to this Staff Report you will find a summary of the impacts and mitiga- tion measures contained within the Draft EIR with the reference page where this appears. No specific action is required by the Planning Commission other than to receive and transmit comments to the City Council. ION: That the Planning Commission receive public input on ovironmental Impact Report to the Redevelopment Plan. ted, Jack Lam, AICP' -- Community Development Director JL:TJB:jk Attachment: Draft EIR ITEM D inalS E- 0 m a H W E- Z c w� O � x O H T. W L Z Q x •N.w•iiy ;i N F.1 N lr a N ro U C O .,I 4J I o� N 0 N -r! N O C a-r1 G E O 1) •ri 11 C rn ro N .--1 C a O U r 1 ro to C) to C 0) CN7 rn N a N 1.) .0 U '0 1) CO C a roc E v c a, m y U ro n. 10.1 -Ei O , 4 +7 N ro c U U ra ro 11 •r1 4 Ow U O •r- N N 0+ O U N N ra 0 3.1 C � •rl N ;: .V i1 a) O > u 0 Y O 7 N N N .1 a•1i N -A M1011 3 11 ro U rn O .--1 0 m U S-1 Q 1 r-1 1 rq to w 1 N ! C c •V G t) ro •14 U CD M N N N N N +1 ro > -rl •r1 C L i U •rl 11 1 � N ! ° •V U O -r1 ro E a N N XOEfaw G 11 :1 r- 4 NON a) >ro cw C 1 N 0) 110.0 ro C •u r1 ro F •ri N ro .11 01 0) a) •a 0);) E4-) •11 ro N N i) d) 11 G 7 0ro 014 ro U) .r4 N G E V > 11 co ro r_n 34 14 -H -.; -rl 1••1 R E •-) :i U O E ro Nti1)O z°zwtro T ro N 3> U w .0 11 ro U Ll - ro 1.1 U U tW w U- 4 G O •r1 ro N 11 N N N ro a C •.i 0 3 ro u E 11 's a 34 > N Nro•11 .V 0) 11 W 3a N x 0 41 0 O >1 >1 c a 0 -r1 04-1 C 4J 4) N 01 -r1 0 31 ro '0 Uri H W 1J G O N C N C N U 10 G -H N N tn •r1 .,.1 > .0 O= U C N •'•1 ro 11 a to Va a. ro U C. •r1 •.1 .-1 3 c 0 -ri ro r1 "'1 > O 11 ro c C ro U x N rot U 4J N ro N C H fir♦ O 4 V taw 11 ra O >. E •-) •,1 O O ro (1) c 0) 0.11 •r1 11 O N .^.. ro U 10 0]. O N •,•t > N 4J P. N ro rJ O 4.) O a) $4 (Ij N C D, -H C N •1.1 N 1) .0 L G c w W a 'a y N 11 ri O 14 $4 N N to N W ro U 11 N U ro -11 � ro V -' -4 E (r, ro ro a u + LL u 0) U 34 G a, t 'o ro 'rnUa c °(V rorq a0 O U 01.14 w N -11C C -N E H N •r7 ^ > G $.t O .-1 O N .-t •rl > ro •rj 0 •rl ro E v 11 ro W O • it 11 O 111-1 11 a) U) C7 N 11 0) N N N $4.0 14 N N N 0. 't) N 11 4-1 W a C 3.1 .c U N ro 0.:) N +1 E N c •11 C a) N O O U C 0 41 04.) ro O a N a m C $4 O -4 44 11 ro V N O N •11 3Uro U01F E1 t13 ro H cc E) 0 041 EN y U ro n. 10.1 -Ei O , 4 +7 N ro c U U ra ro 11 •r1 4 Ow U O •r- N N 0+ O U N N ra 0 3.1 C � •rl N ;: .V i1 a) O > u 0 Y O 7 N N N .1 a•1i N -A M1011 3 11 ro U rn O .--1 0 m U S-1 Q 1 r-1 1 rq to w N c "1 010 N C c •V G t) ro •14 U O •rl •I) N N N N +1 ro > -rl •r1 a) 4 N X .^• � N U U ° N •14 >4 to '0 44 CO Q) 4J XOEfaw G C 11 0 t Q) r1 v C 1 N C ° ro E )1 43 10 01 0) a) •a N N 04 Y .1 a) 1-1 11 ...t 7 7 0ro 014 1H- 0 C .Gi C > G 1 1j 11 U ep 34 G w C -11 -rl 1••1 R E •-) :i U O E ro Nti1)O z°zwtro T ro N 3> U w N W U 4.) • -.1 1-1 C ro 14 N .,..1 C O N N a) - 4 N N W N •r4 ro a a) C O ro 01 tn,�> Nro•11 .V > N a -4 U U >1 c a 0 -r1 -rl G 4 N N U H 0. G roroNrn > .0 •N E U) ro co > N N +) a) to N i N L >r N -ri ro r1 ro +) O 3 x N rot U 4J N ro N C d,j U a) 1. $4 O >. E •-) •,1 V 11 > 4J Q> w 10 1. 41 a E ro U N N .-1 1 O rJ O a) 0.-r4 c N G N c > E .14 C -11 .0 L CL +1 > 7 11 •1i* •r1 1) •.l ro O C O ro N •1.1 O a N c 4J 'U a) 0 -W M 0) 0 1111 N r) U 34 G E 4J U O U 01.14 w E O A N ro r- 0. C O N . 4 ro ro ro N 0444.-1 0 0 °�C,) U -4>.3rowi) m4 .a) to a) L 1) ra •ri O N ;.1 ro a a) )a -U •r1 ro > U U > 4-) 1J a G W > 3 .^• U ra •U a) N ro 1) -r{ H +) r7 Y 14 N U ro 10 N ro 01 Q. N +) N a 0.0 C N 10 N ..4 01x1 0) Q X E a U a rO 5 11 ro -C N .0 .G E •r! N w m •r+ a ro 044 11 UI U •u x +•t 3 •'•1 3> U4 O OI > > C "& 4,4 1 0 -,4 N U ro >1 . 1 JIJ W N 14 0) O ra •14 tri o) o E V •1 o. go a o A o� W F 0 W > 3 y U ro n. 10.1 -Ei O , 4 +7 N ro c U U ra ro 11 •r1 4 Ow U O •r- N N 0+ O U N N ra 0 3.1 C � •rl N ;: .V i1 a) O > u 0 Y O 7 N N N .1 a•1i N -A M1011 3 11 ro U rn O .--1 0 m U S-1 Q 1-i ro U •ri s1 O 41 U) «i T a, 0 1 r-1 1 rq • 1% N 010 N C c •V G t) ro •14 U O •rl •I) N N N N +1 ro > -rl •r1 a) 4 N X .^• � N U U 34 N •14 >4 to C N XOEfaw G W 0 N+3ro Q),4 C 1 N C ° ro E )1 43 10 01 0) a) •a N N 04 Y .1 41 .0 1-1 11 ...t N ro i > G 1 1j °x b ep -r! .a +1 L; n, •-) :i U O E ON Nti1)O z°zwtro N 1-i ro U •ri s1 O 41 U) «i T a, 0 E G $4 rl N ro ri m COUro (C 43 N W •30 U+al G U G ro Ero•E G a, 0 -H N O 0-4 V ri 1-1 N a >wr4 0) N W ,-1 P 10 O '1 ro N G N ro b E N N N > C u n 0 0 N C is Z -r1 H 010 > U c v U 1 O .0 +) 1•c N N 0 N 1 7 11Eo)D N C N G N •rf mCaro N ro ro G G LL N •r1 1j ro a -4 aNi N N ri ,ii a. ro 14 000x) trr-i ro a !1 > N a u 0) N U H 0. G roroNrn N ro c N to N 0110 r1 ro O 101 N N N $4 roro G 4J +) N .-1 1 O N> U N>1 co .14 C -11 to N:: aJ , >'4 N ro E G $4 rl N ro ri m COUro (C 43 N W •30 U+al G U G ro Ero•E G a, 0 -H N O 0-4 V ri 1-1 N a >wr4 0) N W ,-1 P 10 O '1 ro N G N ro b E N N N > C u n 0 0 N C is Z -r1 H 010 > U c v U � L^I N CL .. >1 t ... �-- N JJ 1-1 w J.. •m m N •U-1 U N w U c U •.-A 3 a -•U, a) a .A O Fi ri ti .-a Q) c A N m w •A C E w .0 .-1 W m 3 O U b ro c N 'C) .C; w ri a) m�4 131 O c 43--4 O 'Q c }J c 3:,-4 G1 c U •A m (1) yJ w m )i w A c .A o a) :J >I= 0 c •.• ui a) N m C ro •A C .i a) •A N C ro N ro iJ a -A ;J w it .Q Ei 4J (0 ro o T, to c •A •A a) w m a) w w a w 0 k1 0 CL w ro -A w Q. Q. ri w N m a iJ •0 C •A .-i b m •A O O •A iJ 04.0 '-1 to U> O E N ro O. m� w A c L d F U C). -A JJ w JJ o U (a w A O c O (1) • 10 0%14 •A N w 0 0) C a) a 1-1 li N c m a) w ro -A O N .-{ d C U U to m 1-1 a) (a 7 U 0 JJ •A c a. >, at ri a) E 0,4 1J Q. Q. a C:+ w is to w Q••AN Orti to •yw (a Ua - Aaro Ecca) al N•A a) a9$4 w C v >RQ.Ar,c , c 4JUM4J iQ)oro CNNwO•A(1)o1N0 w w m Q.. 11 m L' N O - U ?{ -A C iJ •A -A aJ •.� al O N ro .0 c a) •A N crw a a, a ro 11 C C (1) •A {J N• 4 0 4J w 010 E ri 4J N .A aJ vl0 N V) 0 CO M 014 Ew 0-14 anUA Ero Q.M tSC W-14 000ta •A > )i )i Ci N'b C ac ) �4.: N •A w x ro •A A N N ri w m E N C )a M Oro C iJ ;J N O N O U w •A C G >+•A O ci 4 U C •A -A C C iJ 0,4 0-1 m C O N a) O a) O N ti -A w 9 C N M % w5 N w JJ E A w 0 M m e ra 0 a) A w -A O U C JP a) •A a > m >, u N N w •>a A c , w A -A iJ 4: 10 -N m 'O 0 10 a E a 0 0 •A b ± ra b O izm • t0 1 c m w •A N CO CO N C •A •- C O C w U N ) ) a C 0 w dJ O C 4-i U a U C O 0 A F 1-4 U N 0 1J w C C W N w 4J i 4-) w N -0 O k fa C •J a 0 CL t0 E •-i m a d.1 C a) H co a) CL U U ?� H •" 0 V •N -A ro 010 U a) CL ri w .-i a) •ri 'O 41 >+ w w b N w ro Cl' W 4J w m w a ri w C -A E Q, a to a Q. w a) to (0 N C N 'C) a (1) a) N M aro w m CJ. J, •A c o .--t CL F-{ > CL N N .V w x •A +) w a) C iJ m N ;03 CO a) N a� °moab+o"Ni Urovaa >[4 w>,a)x v�rari - a)r_40cttow mW ++ R cE+ ECm00a Naroa10EC m b a) a JJ F, 10 ro 1J > w C m u m 1 A iJ C 14 .n C ri (a m t c E c 0 E U 01 C (n a) .••t C) (Z CL iJ 01 0,4 C U to 0 w C yJ .A 0 N C r CL a 0 C 14 a) CL O al iJ CL o c 0 C 41 C. ro 10 .•i O C w a, () E - a) •A w u •A 90 N •A N O •a •A E - 0 m c a .-1 S-4-14 JJ Q. N ..i c .-i m a) b' (1) O iJ -A > .-I a) w •+J N O m b '0 +J U C •A ri .N C >Y C r-t a) 41 m 0 13 JJ •H ro •O Q) > w m C to > 1J .r.i a u Q. w Q) C m a1 0 m ro -A iJ -A -A Uri U -•i 10 w - a w a) 01 w w O U m .-1 U N N iJ m C^ m a) c w CT It •A m (i E .A Q m •:; w C) C ri Q) N •A w w m a 0 c W Q..'-i •A a) 3 a) •A ;J .4 43 C E O � c C N- 7 N N a C 0 E 0 0 0. 4 C G w ha •-r1 C N E E O '.m-1 '°o w --ri 11 00 4 O E +J A •A 0 E U 0, W C' N •A '0 .A 0 0 0 04.H CO O W E H U .A -A w N -A +1 U -W +1 JJ a w w C- C c 0 )•+ ro O 4 uWua)W a� mW - a -44J o w 2 •44J W 0 04.) ULU 0 a) v N -A •A .-i C -A w 01 >••ll aJ +i c 4J a) U +1 N .-1 U1 .i 16 C •A C A 1u C C 41 O .i m -A JJ -A > 0 4-1 01 > it -A m 0 m •A U N r+ CL ri U 3 a) 0 J) -A c A ro dJ U a) +) a) m -A m •A co 'O 4J -ri N 0 U a) w •A N U U •n a) $ U U Q. N C) N u w w a) C a) O w m E m a 0 N 0 N 0 a U 'A E O N si U 4.) () w t-1 a) ro C .0 c m c a U w Cs. C N - C R w Q N JJ •7 to MT 4 a) •A ri a� u 'U ro a n 4.) N m m -4 0 a JJ a) N N E c • aJ C iJ C a) N> c c >1 > JIJ a) S 4J CO >.ri ro N C 0 N >1 U ro •A r-I Um 0 U •-i m a) al E a) 010-11 ri U u ri 0 w 'U •A U m a) m N Q. m J± .-1 •A m ri c C M a) •A JJ C a> (1) iJ 0 v S •A w >r b >EUQ.C•A Ow U 1.1 344 taU UN )'•I al •A •A (0 a) an a) Si CL m CL r-1 w ca 3 •A N •A •A 'C > w ro R Q. a) CL 10 0 43 w '0 1: aJ w O >r w •A E w E ,tJ w C V (0 •A c •A C .p r-1 a) N (n • .i •A -A •A N W 0 w a) c Q) 3J N w () a) .i C a) ro E N w U E N C a w> •A a) CO (1) a) N C CL N Q.•A C m m U U • i 3 'O .--1 N to a m N co N C O N •A a) U •ri U w -0 ....I W w a L r-i a) - •A 14 1J w •A r-I 0 (i •A c > (1) 10 ro >+ N a) w >..0 a) ^1 m U w A •U N m 7 (1) > U C ;J A > U u u > ri A C a IJ r O -I m to A x ),.arc a) c .A A N A x L•A O L G. C u m A ri U a) a .A U C O u N C u o w N a) 1,{ , R. c o N .. qfi'. m all N ro La to U N m 7 O a W O .rr W W (D N r~ C W >, O > . . W U) m N -ri W $4 E O C W O � u n V) c >, S] mO in a W r( a a -4 Oro - e1 3 a e 1i m sj -H .- , 14 cro+J(0 N U 7 0 a E1 O ro E .- (1) 14 m > V ro N C C w O •a to O c O y. U W N M U )•( = to C 7 W W •r( a) 0 ++ W •ri O w 3 a W 1+ aJ W 4.3 .0 a) U-4 E C O to C o ro c >, ro 41 C W •ri m OY U) d) b E W N C i N C rd > N U,v O 41 W C: .-( Lt W4' ro m EO.a ro N W l i u W -•i O ::$ :3 O U 0, N 3 0 m rJ ro U aura W W C. N -13 .) U roro0$40 O C 0 4 W 1.) N ro U C b 0 C) > O yW) W 1>i e ) m 1+ W a) .0 U > u O 0 -rl E70 L'1 ilwUSiro3 U U V 0 C J oa1c v -4w411 •14 - -ri �) O a-( W E d) •n N ri W C •H O A N O 0) 4J a-r LL a 7 >•+ c) ro w u= 1r 0 n .0 -H to .i Cf W U 4J 1) p) w C' •.i C m.ro o 541 41 0 U •-+ 0) Q. ..i Q •.i U to y 10 0U4 N O < 7 > O w 0 N r~ C W >, O > . . W U) m N -ri W $4 E O C W O � u n V) c >, S] mO in a W r( a a -4 Oro - e1 3 a e 1i m sj -H .- , 14 cro+J(0 N U 7 0 a E1 O ro E .- (1) 14 m > V ro N C C w O •a to O c O y. U W N M ro W W .0 sa � a W a.l N U ro W Q7 •n u O U )a C W >, 4J4J )a cm4J •.•I V ro L W •4 3 C •r( 14 W C O E o' w a•.4 O N T > -i E W -H W a 3 '0 >( .•r a 0 rn to 0) 4) 3 ) 1� v C 7 W W •r( a) 0 ++ W U ro ro.ucW w 3 a W 1+ W W ji a) U-4 E 0 E O N o � o u 1 ro W 41 C W •ri m W > N O b E W .,i V .-1 -% i N C rd > N U,v >110 h ro 0) it C Lt W4' ro W a .0 N A O -H 7 p V E O W .•i C -H C 41 ,-4 -4 H ro :-r 3 3 °v c W tr N as N r•I V) ri 41 G C 0) >, roro0$40 3 E ••i a m W 1.) N 10 W C O �q C) > O yW) W 1>i •P 1+ W ro 1t O O NL 0 a) W il a-( C U W 1m E70 WtTro ilwUSiro3 ro W W .0 sa � a W a.l N U ro W Q7 •n u O U )a C W >, 4J4J )a cm4J •.•I V ro L W •4 3 C •r( 14 W C O E o' w a•.4 O N T > -i E W -H W a 3 '0 >( .•r a 0 rn to 0) 4) 3 $4 W >, V a% It O S .-t W O 43 H b >>1 a% r-) 3 W +) Y r 0 N •.i C O 7 . r i'0 F- U C it N ro ro W C W C R. b -H O .-4 r0 W c . > ri O N W m -.-i +) 'o -ri 41 4J -.•i W ro C N 'O E W 'O O N 44 to W m > O -H (1) 14 >, W C ,4 EH �'o > -H ri U O O a -rr .0 U4 bAw U CL C •ri -ri N -r) N U OxNWW s.) ro o a++ �Eacn� $4vx •w C< O -P N 14 rn ri (D O b U r0 b) U W CC•.i9 E •rl ro N •rl m) 4J v 4J �4 3a WO Q) C w VI W Nro W 1w C W N U N G W 41 C -.i .-I C i3 N O W ro +) N L:- +1 N N c O.� (1) 44 W ro CEL 0 C O O L4 •ri M .-i 0) +) 0) U W •.i > Ewra W 7 O ro C] r. 44 ro N .-r O O U c 41 N •.a C W 3a4 N N W O N N .H W N W N m N O N E 0 Wca •••i .E G W m 1t-4a to O•i to w ro ra waro)vc 0'2 W Y ri 0 to M U W r- 0 W C O 04'M P .,.i ).i 14 U a w W W W E O .0 .0 -,1 14 H •t) 1J DA r•1 W .i r- 41 N N O) c ro •ri m R. U U O N ra ro ro E O Car C W ra M O •ri W W Si a>i .->i E .d w b N •v 41 C '1 �O ro • ro W U W a) 14 to •.•1 N C J rOW C 0V W .•i 0.14 U w 1r CO.•-)7O U b+N ro1iU C •.i W +) 1) U " N 1i to N 0 C O •ri U N O to R 0) 4 w u 11 11 . •s f•) r•T ui a ro c > O +P E Z7 to W r-) -.-I a C W W r W U O M 4J •ri m � .-1 -% i N C rd > O.i U 3 N W W Z - m b •.+ to fe ro W :-r N N W °v ° m o i40) V4.) V) ri ri '2T.0 F w r-1 W W C O �q ro a � c z Obi 171 •,.i •( > 3 va oa1c v -4w411 !� l( W a-( W E d) •n N ww 1�i $ >CO.O OriA w u= 1r 0 Nra `.'O v-O� O E H i a0 m.ro o 541 C O -W O Sa Sa ro 14 C •-a 0 .N CO C W roW E+ 3�U4-1a, -4 jrod N 14 WC3)Wr U N -A ri -c ro 1-4 U N .i 3 •V If ++ W C to -.i . i .--( W O1 m li C1" -4 .V En 3 tPU C •� W rUJ -•C 03 N 3 C 4 4 i N•-1 R•UWOUw •-i ro w O C U )-) O 44 .-i 3 C .-i •H r0 01-4 J w ro b 'O .r•( N t., C c3: C 41 (a W W 14 Ti It w .,.i U E W a) N U O .-r W M m U) N 'I CO CO W O ro i) CO w i) -J ro si •'-( W U (U "1 C C' 0) 7 W $4 M :i C 7 w N 0) E C •rr E +r W N C ••1 •r) H N (C -ri 'O m $4 W >, V a% It O S .-t W O 43 H b >>1 a% r-) 3 W +) Y r 0 N •.i C O 7 . r i'0 F- U C it N ro ro W C W C R. b -H O .-4 r0 W c . > ri O N W m -.-i +) 'o -ri 41 4J -.•i W ro C N 'O E W 'O O N 44 to W m > O -H (1) 14 >, W C ,4 EH �'o > -H ri U O O a -rr .0 U4 bAw U CL C •ri -ri N -r) N U OxNWW s.) ro o a++ �Eacn� $4vx •w C< O -P N 14 rn ri (D O b U r0 b) U W CC•.i9 E •rl ro N •rl m) 4J v 4J �4 3a WO Q) C w VI W Nro W 1w C W N U N G W 41 C -.i .-I C i3 N O W ro +) N L:- +1 N N c O.� (1) 44 W ro CEL 0 C O O L4 •ri M .-i 0) +) 0) U W •.i > Ewra W 7 O ro C] r. 44 ro N .-r O O U c 41 N •.a C W 3a4 N N W O N N .H W N W N m N O N E 0 Wca •••i .E G W m 1t-4a to O•i to w ro ra waro)vc 0'2 W Y ri 0 to M U W r- 0 W C O 04'M P .,.i ).i 14 U a w W W W E O .0 .0 -,1 14 H •t) 1J DA r•1 W .i r- 41 N N O) c ro •ri m R. U U O N ra ro ro E O Car C W ra M O •ri W W Si a>i .->i E .d w b N •v 41 C '1 �O ro • ro W U W a) 14 to •.•1 N C J rOW C 0V W .•i 0.14 U w 1r CO.•-)7O U b+N ro1iU C •.i W +) 1) U " N 1i to N 0 C O •ri U N O to R 0) 4 w u 11 11 . •s N ASA a� i m rn or) C u•4•a• -4 a1-40u 000 , r u ,1 $4 - +morn $ t0 A C bA•H u ws+0rn N m m O Ora ti F m we 0 O U A O C `4 >, C rn - •0o a •^+ � ro N . rt3 m 7a (G +J m 0 -.� C u p vi t C +� .14 00E .+ w0mm N O C 01 0) b W O C N m %+ • t $4 = a N U+j� 7 C O C A -.•r m u r,) 1 'a J .;j r- 0 rt^ > A 3 C ro c c ro 0 E •�l m u ro U Q) m .0 C 0 Y $4 w }1 N 54 U 0 rEi o .) corm m C En z E O t6 m 0 1 O 4 H U mror- > a m ro v 14 m 0 •-+ C m E G m u O U w r. cti w7 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA November 10, 1981 Members of the Planning Commission Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner TIME TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. BACKGROUND: The attached letters from the Applicants request exten- sions for the above - described projects. Generally, the requests are based upon the prevailing high interest rates. Listed below are the expiration dates for each project. The approved Tentative Tract Maps are shown on the attached Exhibits "B " - "D ", respectively. Not one of the Tentative Tracts has submitted plans for plan check to this date. Tract Expiration Date 11605 12 -22 -81 9369/11173 10 -26 -81 9665 12 -22 -81 Tentative Tract Map approvals are valid up to a maximum of 42 months, with appropriate extensions per the Subdivision Ordinance regulations. Therefore, the Planning Commission could grant a maximum time exten- sion of 30 months for all of the above - described projects. However, past Planning Commission policy has been to grant extensions for 18 months. Approval of a time extension for a tentative subdivision map requires a motion to adopt the attached Resolution. ITEM E Request for Time Extension -2- November 10, 1981 RECOMMENDATION: It is rec.jmmended that an 18 month extension be granted for the tracts listed above to run from the present expiration dates to the dates listed in the attached Resolution. Respectful ly s bmitted, fi JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:AT:jr Attachments: Letters from Applicants Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibits B -D - Tentative Tract Maps Resolution r 13 i C. J. OUEYREL. PNCa1DICNT LICCNDCO LAND SURVGVOR ANACAI_ ENGINEERING CO. ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING POST OrrlcC BOX 9668 222 EAST LINCOLN AVENUE • ANAHEIM. CALIFORNIA 92603 PHONE (714) 774 -1763 October 20, 1981 COrfin °,Uh�1Y �'E�t 0FPACNT DEPT. 198! r.r ? City of Rancho Cucamonga �•= 9'j 9320 Baseline I'm suite "C" A1Sk9r1`jri111213.i2j3t'1 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 J1 Attn: City Clerk's Office Ref: Tract No. 11605 Tentative Gentlemen: I The above mentioned Tentative Tract No. 11605 will expire on December 22, 1981. On behalf of our client we are requesting a one (1) year extension of ti,uC and continuance of any reclassification, variances and/or other actior :s pertaining to the above mentioned Tentative Tract. Vert/ tr +)7; yours, ::rJACAL ENGINEERING COMPANY C . C 1. Queyrel CJQ:sh / Cc: Nubank International, Inc. Paul Coombs ➢ }. C � ,got jen"jen Rudder' Atc. 2213 We.�T E. STREET ONTARIO, CAUPORNIA 99762 October 20�, -7.981 City of Rancho Cucamonga 9161 Baseline Foad Rancho Cucammonga, Calif. 9.1730 Attention: Michaol Vairin„ Planning Division Dear Mr. Vairin; We request an extension of six months to finalize the improv_ ment plans for tentative Tract 9369 and tentative Tract 11173. The original approvals were to expire on October 24 and Decem- ber 15, 1981 respectively. Sincerlyy, / Robert C. Jensen RCJ /JJ .'h (714) 984-772: C City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department Planning Division Rancho Cucamonga, CA Attn: Michael Vairin Gentlemen: October 21, 1981 Re: T.ertative Tract No. 9665 On December 22, 1980, Resolution No. 80 -88 for Approval of Tentative' Tract No. 9665 was adopted by the Planning Commission. Due to the very high interest rates, the unavaili.bility of construction money and the slowness of real estate sales during this period I am ® requesting an extension of the approval period of this tentative tract. Please extend tentative Tract- No. 9665 approval period for 18 months to June 22, 1983. (At.the time of tentative approval (12- 22 -80) I called City Hall regarding the period of approval. and was assured that the tentative approval was good for 18 months. If there is any variation to this please clarify.) Thank you. Sincerely, Leo B. Lamb P. 0. Box 104 Upland, CA 91786 P. S. T7.-is letter is in response to your letter regarding applying for extension 60 days prior to expiration of tentative_ approval previously received-- 12- 22 -81. b y 0 13 1 ^. •n R� YSL.�"N2FIt�._ r .- wi.:• ��:w�. u•r ��•er �� w.w y<r ! fR w i Mlk.JUVCJIJU U1JWL� l�l/`euvv�_•vw� �-+ - - nrc'� hltecTme -- I -, I �,,;, a Irw.rno. a,a..w•� +c 01.7:x:..:.: -•- Iduvrntrlti�m'MS ..� - --- C NORTH CI'T'Y OF ITB1:_A - 11M.f Y—)LVernsI( -,ll'- RANCI-i© CUCAMONGA TITLE: � i c �� , � - -rro `� ��,1coo P'LANNIN Di�'ISIQN F-xI 111)IT: _ SG'1LE: --(& e4 i 1 ^. •n R� YSL.�"N2FIt�._ r .- wi.:• ��:w�. u•r ��•er �� w.w y<r ! fR w i Mlk.JUVCJIJU U1JWL� l�l/`euvv�_•vw� �-+ - - nrc'� hltecTme -- I -, I �,,;, a Irw.rno. a,a..w•� +c 01.7:x:..:.: -•- Iduvrntrlti�m'MS ..� - --- C NORTH CI'T'Y OF ITB1:_A - 11M.f Y—)LVernsI( -,ll'- RANCI-i© CUCAMONGA TITLE: � i c �� , � - -rro `� ��,1coo P'LANNIN Di�'ISIQN F-xI 111)IT: _ SG'1LE: --(& e4 0 7! L�IA rev C-; I NORTH CITY OF rrcm: RA NCI-10 CUCANIONGA TITLE: A- 11 1-7,3 PLANNING DIVISION LXI IIBIT- Cc SCALE: TCNTATIV[ ru••e• TRACT N0.9665 — _...,• .• a.• ,. . a•...L.. ... .... .a...... ..... ,w'T AIPQDIV ;'• � -r.. 1'a � .?OUTE . -M:.e - _� i -- -- i }• 1 3 i i L t ql � I yFj. I . —. S —__ i •1 t. + 6 /e I t — - d G� NORTH CITY ®r ITEM: RANCHO C;UC.AANION' TGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXIJil3iT =�1� -- SCALE: cR aim4— • t ' 4 RESOLUTION NO. 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PIANP'-ING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE EXTENSIONS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO'S. 11605, 9369/11173, AND 9665 WHEREAS, applications have been filed for time extensions for the above- described projects, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of OrdinancE 28 -ii, the Subdivision Ordinanca; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held duly advertised rblic hearings for the above - described projects; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described tentative tract maps. SECTION 1: lie Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the fo,lowii,g findings: A. That prevailing economic co.•ditions have caused a lack of financing and high interest rates for const• ction; B. That these economic conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time; is C. That strict enforcement of the cono;:io.,s of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code; D. That the granting of said time extensions will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in tha vicinity. SECTION 2: T.e Rancho Cucamonga 'Tanning Commission hereby grants timr- extensions for the above- described projects as follows: Tract Expiration Date 11605 May 22, 1983• 9369/11173 M, -ch 26, 1983 9665 May 22, 1983 r '�I Resolution No. Page 2 AWL APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY NOVEMBER, 1981. PLANIJING COMMISSION OF THE C--TY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary o tie P ammng Ca�mt7— 'ssion I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City c" Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November, 1981, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COWIISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C r,, L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 10, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commissioci FRONT: Jack Lam. AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CITY cNVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES BACKGROUND: Under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and the State Environmental Guidelines, cities are re- quired to adopt appropriate procedures for processing environmental documents. To date, the City has been utilizing the State Environ- mental Guidelines and there has bean a need for developing more pre- cise guidelines for actual environmental processing. Attached is the City Environmental %idzlines as proposed by the Planning Division staff which sets _p precise procedures for proces- sing environmental documents. The procudures are similar to what is presently being used. These guidelines are meant to be used in con- junction with the State Environmental Review Guidelines which set forth broader criteria and policies which must be met. Typically, the State amends the State Environmental Guidelines on an annual basis which normally causes cities to make appropriate amendments to their guidelines. However, we have taken the approach to write guidelines addressing only the processing portion of the environ•- mentai law and utilize the State law for the other environmental criteria. The benefit in this procedure is the alleviation of time nd cost caused by constant amendment to the guidelines as a result of State amendments. The only time we would necessitate amendments would be if the State amendments actually affected the way we were processing our environmental documents. The City Attorney and attorneys for the Redevelopment Agency have reviewed the document and their commonts have bees: incorporated. Attached is a Resolution of approval and ;-commendation to the City Council. ITEM F City Environmental Guidelines _2_ Novenber 10, 1981 RECOMMENDATION: E_ ND_ ATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission find the guidelines consistent with State Environmental Law and recommend their adoption by the City Council in addition t. incorporation by reference Of the State Environmental Guidelines. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL-MV: jr Attachments; Environmental Guidelines Planning Commission Resolution D V i y�. i �.� I ' � �,��. � is ,• � � / • � �� ti'L� J �d I , ., •! f( i. ,i i'�. •. � , i' „. CITY OF RANCHO CUCA MONGA ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES CONTENTS Page California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1 Initial Study/ Negative Declaration Process 2 -3 Environmental Impact Report Process 3 -6 APPENDIX Flow Chart A Environmental Assessment Notice B Negative Declaration C Notice of Preparation D Notice of Completion E Notice of Determination F r 0 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW HANDBOOK The purpose of this handbook is to acquaint the user with the procedures, policies, and administrative tools used to implement the California En- vironmental Quality Act (CEQA) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The in- tent of this information is to give the applicant a clear and accurate explanation of the Environmental Review process ano its relationship to the State Environmental Law and the City's development review process. CEQA - A BRIEF HISTORY In 1970, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was passed and signed into law. The Act required that Environmental Impact Reports be prepared for projects in actions which could have a significant impact on the environment. During its first few years, the Act was interpreted as applying only to projects constructed or carried out by governmental agencies. In 1972, the California Supreme Court decided that the term "projects" includes private projects, which are subject to public agency review and regulation. Following this decision, the legislature amended the definition of "project" to include private activities that are sub- ject to governmental review and approval. The State Resources Agency prepared guidelines for the implementation of CEQA by local public agencies. The State Guidelines are binding on all local agencies. However, they are general guidelines and only provide the basic principles, objectives, criteria, and definitions which indi- vidual agencies shall adopt for internal use in implementing CEQA at the local level. The Guidelines allow individual agencies to de.elop their own review process within the limits of CEQA. The City oY Rancho Cucamonga has adopted the State Guidelines by reference and has developed an environmental review procedure within the parameters of CEQA and the State Guidelines. This handbook is designed to be an addendum to the State Guidelines, which will outline Rancho Cucamonga's specific environ- mental review procedures. CEQA divides projects into two categories; discretionary and ministerial. A Discretionary project is an activity, which requires judgement deliber- ation, or decision by the public agency, prior to approval. Ministerial projects require a public agency to issue permits that do not require judgement or deliberation. the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that such activities ns approval of final subdivision maps, issuance of building permits, issuance of business licenses, issuance of ireL removal permits, issuance of encroachment permits, and approval of individual utility con- nections are ministerial projects and do not require environmental review. Certain types of activities, including those that are classified as small scale discretionary projects, have been predetermined not to have a significant effect on the environment, and are designated as a "cate- gorical exemption" f -om environmental review. These "categorical exemptions" are specifically listed in the State Guidelines. Environ- mental review is not required for categorically exempt activities or for ministerial projects. All discretionary projects require environ- mental review and /or clearance. INITIAL STUDY /NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROCESS Initial Study Ouestionnaire After it has been determined that a project required environmental review, the next step in the process is the completion of the Initial Study Questionnaire. The Initial Study Questionnaire is divided into two parts. Part I i.°. completed by the applicant, Part II is completed by the Planning Division staff. The purpose of Part i is to gather general information about the proposed project, its environmental set- ting, and the type of impacts the project mi�:ht be expected to have on the environment. Part II is a checklist con'.aining a list of possible impacts. This checklist is completed by the Planning staff in conjunction with a field investigation and is u_ed to gather and organize information on potential environmental impacts of a proposed project. The Initial Study shall be completed within fourty -five (45) days from the date of acceptance of a complete application, unless a continuance or waiver is granted by the applicant. Staff Recommendation The completed Initial Study forms the basis for one of the following staff findings: 1. The proposed project may have a significant '. ,,pact on the environ- ment. This finding forms the basis for a sV ff recommendation that an Environmental Impact Report (E.I.R.) or an expanded Initial Study be prepared for the project_ 2. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment. This finding forms the basis for a staff recommend- ation that a Negative Declaration Fe approved for the project. The proposed project will not have a significant impact, if certain mitigation measures are added to the project. This finding forms the basis for a staff recommei,.,ation t:-:;t a Negative Declaration be approved, provided that specific mitigation measures are incorporated into the project. ..2- Ll Planning Commission Review The staff recommendation will be advertised in the newspaper ten (10) days prior to the Planning Commission meeting, in the form of an Environmental Assessment Notice. The notice shall provide a full description of the project and staff's recommendation. The Staff Report and Part I of the Initial Study are presented to the Planning Commission at a regular meeting. The Planning Commission may take one of the follow'ng actions: 1. Require the preparation of an E.I.R. 2. Issue a Negative Declaration (finding no significant impact) with or without mitigation measures 3. Require that additional imfo- mation be snn.,^,lIc-i prior to taking further action. If a Negative Declaration is approved, formal notification is sent to the applicant. A signed, approved copy of the Negative Declaration including both parts of the Initial Study, is sent to the San Bernaraino County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. After making the decision to carry out or approve the project for which a Negative Declaration has been prepared, a Notice of Determination is sent to the County Clerk. When a Negative Declaration is approved, the Environmental Process is completed, unless the decision is appealed to the City Council. In some cases, a project approval or issuance of a Negative Declaration, must be completed by the City Council, upon recommendation fr:nr the Planning Commission. In those cases, the Negative Declaration shall be signed by Council and sent a*'ter Council approval. Appeal to City Council Any environmental determination by the Planning Commission may b appealed in writing and filing appropriate fee to City Council, by any affected party within fourteen (I4) days from the Commission's decision. After deliberation, the City Council may uphold or reverse the decision of the Planning Commission, or take any of the actions listed under the Planning Commission review section. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PROCESS Determination that an E.I.R. is Required After reviewing the Initial Study and the staff recommendation, the Planning Commission may determine that an E.I.R. is required. The -3- determination of the Commission shall be made at a public hearing which has been lawfully advertised. During the public hearing, the Commission shall receive any public imput on the scope and content of the E.I.R. The Planning Commission, as part of their determination, shall discuss the focus of the E.I.R. The concerns voiced by the Commission and those received through the Notice of Preparation shall form the basis of the E.I.R. Notice of Preparation Once the decision has been made to require an E.I.R. a "Notice of Prepar- ation" shall be prepared and sent by certified mail, to State, Regional and Local governmental agencies, school districts, and public utilities which may have an interest in the project. The Notice of Preparation conta4ns a description of the project and information on the location and probable environmental effects of the project. This notice requests these agencies to make specific responses regarding the scope ane. content of *_hs proposed E.I.R. and environmental information related to the agency's jurisdiction, which may be included in the E.I.R. Selection of a Consultant After determination of the scope and content of the E.I.R.,, staff shall prepare a "Request for Proposal" (REP) on tae project, to be sent _,, environmental consultants. The applicant may suggest that names be added to 'th. iist, however, the consultant is selected by the City and will be under contract directly to the City to prepare he E.I.R. Neither the applicant nor consultants affiliated withthe applicant may be selecte. to prepare the report. After the consultant's proposals are received, tie most qualified candidates are interviewed and a final consultant selection is made. Contract and Compensation A contract containing the scope of work and a work program for the E.I.R. is prepared ar.d signed by the City and the consultant. The consultant's fee is establ°;hed by the consultant and is payable by the applicant to the City upon finalization of the contract. In addition to the consul- tant's compensation,a fee equal to ?D% o° U e actual cost of the E.I.R. will be charged by the City to cover the ,ity's costs for consultant selection. contact preparation, analysis of the E.I.R., public hearings, Staff Reports, and legal publications. The fees for the E.I.R. shall be deposited with the City in a Trust Account and shall be paid to the consultant as work is completed. Preparation and Printir_g It is the consultant's task to prepare a Draft Environmental Impac. Report (DE'R) in accordance with the contract with the City and in compliance with CEQA and Statt. Environmental Guidelines. When the draft is completed, a -4- C screen check of the text is performed by the Planning Division staff. . Upon completion of any revisions required by staff, an appropriate number of copies of the D.E.I.R. are printed for distribution. The number of copies varies with the nature of the project. The consultant shall be responsible for printing and distribution of the D.E.I.R., unless other- wise specified :n the contract. Discribut;on and Review Copies of the D.E.J.R. with a "Notice of Completion" attached, are distributed by the consultant to State, Regional, and Local agencies for comment. If the project has been determined by the St-a ° Office of Planning and Research to have Regional and /or State wide significance, a review period of forty -five (45) days will be required. If not, the review period shall be a minimum of thirty (30) days. The Planning Division will receive the remainder of the copies, which are distributed to other City divisions and public agencies. Copies of the D.E.I.R. should be made available at the County Branch Library for pubic review. The City Planning Division is the lead agency for review of the D.E.I.R. All comments on the Draft E.I.R. are channelled through the Planning Division and forwarded to the consultant. The consultant will be re- sponsible for responding to these comments. Upon conclusion of the review period and the consultant's response to all comments, the Planning Division shall prepare a Staff Report to the Planning Commission on the adequacy of the report and its findings All comments and responses will become an addendum to the D.E.I.R. Any changes or additions approved by the Planning Commission will be made by the consultant prior to printing the Final E.I.R. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission shall reviev. the D.E.I.R. at an advertised public h ear;ng. The Commission can take one of the following actions on the ad- ,quacy of the environmeni.al impacts identified and its findings: 1. Require additional information or modifications in the text, before accepting the D.E.I.R. as adequate; or, Z. ". cept the D.E.I.R. ds adequate with a finding of no significant adverse impacts, based upon the implementation of mitigation measures outlined in the report; or, 3. Accept the D.E. ?.R. as adequate with a finding of significant adverse impacts. The last finding (of significant adverse impact) does not necessarily prevent approval of the project. she project could be approved, but the approval body must show over riding considerations in such approval. If the Planning Commission is the approval body for the project, then the Commission shall be the certifying body. If the Council is the final approval body, then the Commission shall forward a recommendat4on to the -5- City Council on the adequacy of the document. The City Council shall ho " a public hearing to consider such. recommendation and any other input on the adequacy of the E.I.R. Notice of Determination After approving a project for which an E.I.R. has been prepared and certified, the City shall file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of San Bernardino County, Board of Supervisors., If the project requires discretionary approval from a State agent;, the notic, will also be filed with the State Secretary for Resources. If the City Council epproves a project which would allow the occurrence of significant impacts, which are identified in t'-e E.I.R., but are not mitigated, the Cit.- must state an writing, the overriding. reasons to support its action based on the E..I.R. and /or other information in the record. This statement must Ne includedin the Notice of Determination. The filing of the Notice of Determination completes the formal Enviorn- mental Review Process ar.d starts a 30 -day statute of limitations on court challenges to the approval under CEQA. Further Ouestions The foregoing is an over adopted and administered m.,re detailed provisions which are not covered in documents or this review Division. riew of the Environmental Review Process as by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are of CEQA and the State Environmental Guidelines AOL this handbook. Questions regarding these p•ocess should be directed to the C -ty Planning -6- 0 CEQA PROCESS FLOW CAART Public age,.-cy deterrtir.es whether the activity is a — Not a project — — — —. —. — L+hblic agency determines if e project is exempt Not I exempt Public agency evaluates project t determine if there is a passibiliti that the project may have a sig- Possible significant effect Determination of lead agency where more than 1 public agency is agency Respond to informal Reurond to Notice of P•e- paradon as to contents of draft EIR Comments on adequacy of draft EIR. or Negative Declaration final EIR or Negative Declaration prepared by lead agency Findings on feasibility of reducing or avoiding significant cnviron_ on Lead Statutory exrmption — Categoricai e- ei:rption No possible significant effect No further action required under CEQA Lead agency prepares initial study ILead agency deusion t: prepare EIR or Negative Declarltion Lead agency -,ends Notice of preparation to responsible agency Lead agency prepares drat EIR T Lead agency files Notice of rAm- pletion and gives public notice of availability of draft -AR Public review period Lead agency pre, .res final EIR including responses to comments on draft EIR. Consid— raton and approval o` final EIR by decision making body Findings on feasibli -y of reducing or avoiding significant environ- 57 Declaration W Lead age..v gives public notice of availability of Negative Declaration Public review period Negative Declaration decision makine body State agencies Local agencies State agerici -s Local agencies File Notice of File Not!" of File Notice o —� File Notice of Determination with Determination with Determination with Determination with Secretary for Rescurces .,,.,runty Clerk Secretary for Resot.irces Count Clerk Appendix A El I 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. NOTICE complete environmental assessments have beer, prepared for ;:he following projects. The Planning Commission will be considering these assessments, scaffIs reco,mnendaticn, and public input, at their meeting of prior to making a. final environmental determination. Following is a brief description and locati-)n of project and Staff's recommendation on the projects to be considered: A copy of the Enviro- unent-al Assessment can he reviewed at the City of Rancho cucanonga Planning Division offices located at 9340 Base Line Road, Suite "B ", W: u.he Cucrmonga, CA 91730. Written comments should be addressed to the Planning Division at the above address or phoned at (714) 989 -1851. In addition, concerns can be addressed to the Planning commission publicly at the meeting time previously mer'Cicned. The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. and shall take place at the Lion's Park Com- munity Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. Brief Description of Project: 2. Name and Address of Applicant: Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has determined that the above project will not have a significant effect upon the environment. An Environmental. Impact Report will not be required. 4. Minutes of such 3eci.sion and the Initial Study prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga are on file in the Planning Division of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 5. This decision may be appealed to the City Council, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. A written appeal and filing fee must be received by the Planning Division no later than 5:00 p.m. 6. This Negative Declaration is subject to the implementation of mitigating measures (if any) as listed on the attachments. DATED 'u e Appendix C 11 ICJ CITY OF RANCID CUCAMONGA qP NOTICE OF PREPARATION TO: FROM: esponsible Agency) Lea gency (Address) ress SUBuECT: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental impact Report will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an environmental impact report forte project identified below. We need to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental information which is germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities in connection wiih the proposed project. Your agency will need to use tl.e EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. The project description, lo.-ation, and the probable environmental effects are contained in the attached materials. A copy of the Initial Study ` is, _ is not, attached. Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 45 days after receipt of this notice. Please send your response to at the address shown above. We will need the name for a contact person in your agency. Project Title: Project Applicant, it airy: DATE 11 Signature Title Telephone Appendix D } V; CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONCA NOTICE OF COMPLETION FORM Project Title roject Location—Specific 0 Project Location —City Project Location — County Description of Nate, Purpose, and Beneficiaries of Project Lead Agency Division Address Where Copy of EIR is P.wailable Review Period Contact Person Area Co a Phone ivension Appendix E CITY OT RMICHO CUCAMONGA NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: _ Secretary for Resources FROM: City of Rancbo . Cucamonga 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 planning Divisiori Sacramento, California 95814 P. O. Box 807 or County Clerk P,ancho Cucamonga, C& 91730 County of San Bernardino SUB3EC7: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. Project Title State Clearinghouse Number Contact Person Telephone N rn r Cif submitted to Clearinghouse) Project Location Project Description i his is to advise that the (Lead Agency or Respost le Agency has approved the above described project and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project will, _ will not, have a significant effect on the envir c:anent. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration•, was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at: 3. Mitigation measures `were, _ were not, made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations ` was, _ was not, adopted for this project. Date: C Signature Title Appendix P a RESOLUTION NO. wo A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING CITY EN- VIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES AND ADOPTT14G BY REFERENCE THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES AS CONTAINED IN SECTION 15000 OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE WHEREAS, the State of California has enacted the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to provide decisionmakers with useful information on how government actions affect the environment; arid, WHEREAS, the State of California has developed environmental guidelines for the implementation of CEQA; and, WHEREAS, the state guidelines only provide basic criteria and direction whiub requires local agencies to prepare and adopt addit:onal guidelines for environmental processing within its boundaries. SECTION 1: Therefore, the Planning Commission hereby finds the following: 1. That additional guidelines are needed to supplement the State EIR Guidelines for proper implementation of CEQA. SECTION 2: The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council edopt the State Environmental Review Guidelines by incorporation by -•eference as now contained in Section 15000 et. seq. of Title 14 of the California Administrative Code and as hereafter amended. Further, to supplement the State EIR Guidelines for proper implementation of CEQA, the Commission recommends that the Council adopt the additional guidelines attached hereto. SECTION 3: The Planning Commission and City Council are hereby designated as the local agency for purposes of implementing the State EIR Guidelines, as supplemented. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1511. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: _ Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Panning Commission C Resolution No. Page 2 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November, 1981 by the following vote to -wi t: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ;E fL 11 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT November 10, 1981 Members of the Planning Commission Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner ABSTRACT: This report outlines the Draft Redevelopment Plan and rec- ommends that the Planning Commission find the Draft Redevelopment Plan consistent with the City's General Plan. BACKGROUND: The California State Law for redevelopment specifically requires that the City's Planning Commission indicate to the City Coun- cil and the Redevelopment Agency that they have determined the Redev- elopment Plar. is consistent with the City's General Plan. Essertialiy, the Redevelopment Plan has been prepared as an expression of the City's General plan. Projects or proposals which are containea within the Redevelopment Plan are determined as a source of implementation of the General Plan. The Planning Commission may recall during the review of the General Plan that a specific implementation measure in the General Plan was the use of a Redevelopment Program. This program, therefore, is a continuation of the General Plan policies. This issue is discussed in more detail starting on page 22 of the Redevelopment Plan. The Plan objectives shown on Exhibit 3 are consistent with the policies through- out the General Plan. The Redevelopment Plan is divided up into six sections which include: Introduction Redevelopment Implementation Development Within the Project Area Low- and - Moderate Income Households Project Financing Special Administrative Provisions Each of these subsections are referenced to the sections of the Cal- ifornia Administrative Law on Redevelopment. Therefore, the material which is contained in this plan is required as specified in the Cal- ifornia law on redevelopment. ITEM G November 10, 1981 Recommendation on General Plan Consistency Draft Redevelopment Plan _Z_ RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Plairiii„y' Counnission approve. the attached Resolution finding that the Redevelopment Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan. Ilk submitted, Jack Lam; 'AT -%," -- "`�•....r Community Development Director JL:jk Attachments: Resolution of Approval Draft Redevelopment Plan Memo from K.S.I. Dated November 3, 1981 f 17 i9EM0RANDUM TO: Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commision FRO "1: Abe OeDios W DATE: November 3, 1981 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Actions Scheduled for November 10, :.981 On November 10, 1981 'the Planning Commission will consider the proposed Rancho Redevelopment Plan and its conformity to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The California Community Redevelopment Law specifically requires that the Planning Commission provide the City Council and Agency with its report and recommendation on this item. The resolution which the Planning Commission will consider serves as the required report and approval of that resolution will indicate that the Commission find, conformity between the Redevelopment Plan and General Plan. In addition, the Planning Commission, at this time, may recommend for or against approval of the Rancho Redevelopment Plan. At that same meeting, the Planning Commision will hold a public hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the proposed Rancho Redevelopment Project:. The purpose of this hearing is to directly solicit community and other input on the Draft EIR. Although a "iJotice of Completion" was published in the local newspaper October 12, 1931and Draft EIR's made available for review (City Nall, Library, and mailed to responding agencies), we believe that an additional forum for public input be provided to assure that all concerned have ample opportunity to discuss the document. In addition, there will remain two weeks in the 45 day environmental review period subsequent to this Planning Commision hearing in which we will be able to adequately respond to any concerns voiced on November-10. We believe that this additional hearing to that vihich will be held prior to certification of the final EIR (December 2, 1981) will provide the City Council and Agency with the most inclusive environmental document and aid in anticipating any major concerns which may arise again on December 2, 1981- Finally, vie will be available at the November 10, meeting to answer any questions or respond to any comments the Commission may have on the Redevelopment Plan or Draft Environmental Imapct Report. cc: Tim Bee ,dle Jock Lam Lauren Wasserman RESOLUTION 140. A kESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED RE- DEVELOPMENT PLAN, ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A ", FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT CONFORMS TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND TRANSMITTING ITS REPORT AND RECOMME14DAT'nN TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, on August 12, 1981, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 81 -93 and thereby adopted a Preliminary Plan for the redevelopment of a certain Project Area (Rancho Redevelopment Project) within the City of Rancho Cucamonga to effectuate the public purposes ueclared in the Community Redevelopment Law, Health and Safety Code, Division 24, Part 1 (Section 33300 et seq_) WHEREAS, said Planning Commission Resolution directed the Secretary of this Commission to transmit the Preliminary Plan to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 81 -93, a Redevelopment Plan for the Pancho Redevelopment Project was transmitted to this Commission. The boundaries of the Rancho Redevelopment Project are specifically described in the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, a copy of the Redevelopment Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit "A "; and WHEREAS, this Commission has reviewed the Redevelopment Plan with particular regard to tt : Plan's conformity to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Redevelopment Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit "A ", conforms to the General Plan of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SECTION 2: This Resolution shall constitute this Commission's report and recommendation to the City Council with regard to the Redevel- opment Plan as required by the California Health and Safety Code Section 33346. SECTION 3: The Secretary of this Commission shall (a) certify to the adoption of this resolution, and (b) transmit a copy of this reso- lution to the City Council and to the Redevelopment Agency. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 10th day of November, 1981. 0 1. l.JV1U Y. V11 i.U. Paga 3 10. Waits within the 3000 square foot area may include a variety of housing types and designs, such as attached units, zero lot line, and center plot units, combined driveways and side entry garages. 11. Recreational vehicle parking shall be provided for 2E% of the 3000 square foot lots. The location, size, design, screening and landscaping of the proposed temporary parking area shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval. Also, a master plan for the permanent location(s) of R.V. parking areas shall be completed within 2 years and shall be subject to Design Review Committee review and approval. 12. Each park area within each village shall be dedicated to the City in a complete form including, but not limited to, installed parking areas, seeded play areas, landscaping and irrigation, sidewalks, 1.ghting, and restrooms prior to the construction of greater than 200 dwelling units of the lots within the village. Park design shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services and consistent with the Victoria Planned Communities and reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. ENGINEERING DIVISION 13. Highland Avenue shall have 44' wide pavement (curb to curb distance) with 7 half width future median island at the north. The north curb shall be straight curb and the south side shall have a 4' wide concrete gutter (hike lane). 14. Construction of the missing improvements on Highland Avenue including, but not limited tc curb, gutter and A.C. pavement across Edison Company's easement west of the project boundary shall be required. *44' wide pavement improvements (curb to curb) 15. Fula- 9.�ittt#r ytret�C- ymproverner►CY {curk> t�rr t urb)- sha71 be constructed on Highland Avenue across Casaletti's Polka Palace. Necessary improvements feathering to match the �ta^eet -grade• -shall be required. *existing grades 16. Highland Avenue from Street "K" westward shall be re- designed and reconstructed so as to provide a positive flood barrier for the project area and to divert all flood waters around the tract area. 17. All designs and constructions of meet the requirements of CalTrans trans- shraa- be-retytrir d prior to *Formal approval from CalTrans ma discretion of the City Engineer. Highland Avenue shall -uml- upprova 1- ti"om• recordation of the tract. y not be required at the KesoiuLion No. Page 4 18. The design of the Victoria Parkway shall be based on the following criteria: I9 a� - Ves4"-spee4 -4b -MPH: a.b. Minimum horizontal curve radius shall be 650 feet at the centerline of the travel lane; b.c. Minimum pavement section shall be 3" A.C. over 4" Aggregate Base. Actual section shall be determined from R -value test. c.o. Wo nuisance water shall be allowed to flow through er across the pavement section. d.¢. Properly designed edger along the edge of the pavement shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. c.f. Intersection details shall be approved by the City Engineer and shall be designed such that necessary sight distance is maintained and vehicular turning movement conflicts are avoided. 19. Design of Base Line Road intersection shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to submittal of final improvement plans. 20. Design of Victoria Parkway undercrossing across Southern Pacific Rail Road shall be approved by the Railroad Company and the City Engineer prior to recordation of the maps. 21. All local streets may be designed with 6" curb face. The loop street "R" shall have 8" curb face. 22. Whera sidewalk is adjacent to 'the curb, the width of the sidewalk shall be 4.5 feet wide measured from the face of the curb. 23. Plans of all non standard street sections shall be submitted to the Ci,y Engineer for approval prior to preparation of improvement plans. After approval, the applicant's Engineer shall submit to the City a suitable reproducible of those plans suitable for incorporation into City Standard plans. i ,_ Resolution No. Page 5 24. Construction of an adequate concrete lined diversion channel (master planned storm drain Line 1) to intercept runoff from the water course at Highland Avenue shall be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The channel shall have the capacity to convey 100 -year fre- quency storm runoff with 25% bulking factor- without any freeboard. Adequate inlet and outlet structures shall also be provided. The locations of the terminus of the channel and the method of discharge shall be as determined or approved by the City Engineer from one of the following alternate designs: a. The terminus at a retention basin located at west of Edison corridor, south of Base Line Road (parcel owned by the applicant) with a regulated outflow connection to Day Creek channel. This will require approval by the San Bernardino County Flcod Ccntrol District. b. The terminus as above with the outflow as a sheet overflow to the property at south of the basin. This requires a flowage easement from the property owners to the south. c. The terminus at the proposed retention basin at south of Base Line Road. The channel to be aligned along the future Day Creek Boulevard with Day Creek Boulevard being rough graded to accept overflow from the channel. 25. The following design criteria for the proposed storm drain (Line H) along easterly tract boundary shall be used: a. Unler- otherwise mentioned, the proposed drain shall conve;, 25 -year frequency storm runoff. b. Offsite runoff from the drainage area north of Highland Avenue as shown on the master plan shall be conveyed through the pipe. *facility c. An adequate inlet structure and a debris bm-i7 at an appropriate location shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. nesutution rio. Page 6 26. d. The storm drain in Victoria Parkway shall be designed to carry 100-year frequency storm. A suitable al- ternative to this criteria may be acceptable to the City Engineer provided ;,-at the applicant's Engineer submits all calculations necessary to show that no erosion or damage to the pavement or the parkways will take place and the proposed railroad undercrossing will remain open to vehicular traffic during heavy storm. e. The combined capacity of all street right-of-way and the storm drain shall be capable of handling 100 -year storm runoff, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. i < or basins A drainage retention basin shall be constructed south of Base Line Read tc the eatisfactian of the City Engineer for the storm discharge from CaL proposed drain 'line 1 and ivr line ii, if required. The basin snail be designed per City approved "Drainage Retention Basin Criteria" for Day and Etiwanda Creek Drainage plan, and the discharge from the basin shall be limited to the predevelopment runoff quantities. Metered outlet pipe or structure shall be constructed to drain the basin di:recttyp to the existing channel along Devore Freeway with a -regulated flow. Pro- visions shall be made to prevent erosion and debris depo- sition from the outflow of the basin. 27. The storm drainage fee for the project shall be credited towards the cost of constructing the adopted Master Plan drains. 28. The applicant shall participate in and contribute to the construction of Day Creek channel when necessary mechanism to construct the same is formulated. 11 29. Construction of necessary flood protection measures to the satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be required to protect the project area from overflow of Day Creek channel icand possible arm- probeb+e- breakage of Day Creek levee including, but riot limited to the following: a. Construction of necessary grading, berms, extention of diversion channel shall be required at north of Highland Avenue, west of Street "K" to provide a positive flood protection from the flood waters entering the project area through the access road and rerouting the same westerly around the project boundary. The design of such measures shall meet the requirements of CalTrans and shall be ipproved by the City Engineer •strd- -Carl-T'rwm prior to recordation of the tract. Resolution No. Page 7 A 6' high flood protection wall alone, Highland Avenue and along the diversion channel from Street "K" to west tract boundary shall be constructed. The footing of the wall shall be below the top of curb elevations and the height of the wall shall be measured from top of the proposed berm. The berm along the wall facing Highland Avenue shall be flattened to 4:1 slope to reduce the possibil•'sty of flood .caters jumping the wall, *or suitable alternative as approved by the City Engineer. !� c. A 6' high combination of wall and berm shall be constructed along Highland Avenue for the rest of the project boundary, *or suitable alternative as approved by the City Engineer d. A 2' high masonary wall with 6' over natural ground shall be constructed along west tract boundary from Street "J" to north tract boundary and from Street "JJJ" t_ sccth tract boundary. An engineered earthen berm (4' high and 10' wide at top) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be constructed connecting these two walls. A secondary berm (6' high & 10' wide at- top) from Street "JJJ" extending northeasterly to street. "R" north of Victoria Parkway shall also be required. A drainage ditch approximately 2' deep and 5' from the wall or the toe of the berm shall be pro- vided to divert flood waters away from the berms. Necessary construction easements will be required where work is required off -site. Alternate protection *may be provided by excavation within Day Creek Boulevard if equival- ent to the foregoing measures. 30. A separate landscaping and lighting district shall he formed for the entire Victoria planned community. 31. The following perimeter street parkways and others are required to be annexed to that landscaping and lighting district: a. Park area b. Open Space trail area c. Highland Avenue Victoria Parkway oop street "R" 32. Prior to recordation of the tract, the design of the open space trail area and the loop street parkway and sidewalk design shall be approved by the City Engineer. The design shall incorporate such features that the maintenance area and the cost of future maintenance is minimized. Ke SUlUtion rdo. Page 8 33. The applicant shall provide a maintenance guarantee bond for a period of one year from the date of Annexation of the areas to the Maintenance District. 34. Prior to recordation of the map, necessary approval must „ be received from -Cal Traps in regards to the alignment of IgII future freeway frontage road along Highland Avenue and the required dedication thereof, as shown on the tentative map. Any revision to the alignment, if required lay - W - Traps, which substantially alters the design of the map, will necessitate submittal of a revised tentative map for that portion of the phasing for City's approval. Prior to recordation of the map, the necessary easements 35. outside the tract boundaries for the following improvements shall be dedicated to the City by separate instrument: a. Inlet structures north of Highland Avenue for the storm drain lines I w H. b. Diversion channel across Edison easement and along future Day Creek Boulevard, if required. c. For the storm drain (I) south of Base Line. d. Highland Avenue across Edison easement. e. A temporary easement for the proposed retention basin with outfall structures at south of Base Line. This easement shall be vacated after the master plan of storm drain system and Day Creek channel improvement is completed. f. Along Edison easement for flood protection measures. ryry31S'. The Public Utility Easements behind sidewalks along 44' U 36. wide local streets shall be minimum of-Cr' wide.- *111 wide. !!11 Additional easements may be required by the Utility Companies. 39. Drainage and Utility easement across open space connecting 37. streets "III" and "CCC" and Streets "CCC" to Victoria Park - way. 37. The proposed driveway easement along lots 634, 635 and lots 38. 651, 652, 653, 699, 700 and 701 shall not be accepted by the City. A C.C. & R. on those lots or Homeowner's Association for those lots to the satisfaction of the City Attorney shall be recorded with the map. Resolution No. Page 9 U. Street vacation required for the following streets within 391, the project boundary: a. Railroad Avenue north b. Victoria Street c. Hanley Avenue �7. Noise attenuation wall (masonry wall) shall be constructed 40. along the entire length of the common boundary between Southern Pacific Railroad and the tentative tract. 4V. Prior to recordation of any tract all off -site and on -site 41. improvement plans shall be approved by the City Engineer. W. Prior to issuance of occupancy permit for any dwelling 42. units the following improvement work shall be completed and accepted by the City in addition to all off -site improvements for the particular phase of development: a. Highland Avenue flood protection measures as mentioned herein above. b. Flood protection wall and berms along west tract boundary. c. Diversion channel (line I). d. Storm drain Line H from Highland Avenue to proposed retention basin, including the retention basin. e. Major access road from Base Line or Highland Avenue to the phase boundary with an emergency access pro - vision to Highland Avenue or Base Line Road. %12. Lots 633, 654, and 698 shall be designated as a mini -park 43. area. Necessary park improvements with a Tiny Tot Lot shall be provided per City Standard. The required drain- age and utility easements shall be located within this open space area. �A. Prior to recordation of the first phase subdivision, a 44. map or other legal documents to the satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be recorded to prevent creation of unrecognized parcels. Kew IuLIun Wu. Page 10 44I. Clustered mail boxes to be installed behind sidewalks, 45. shall meet the requirements and approval of'U.S. Postal Service. 99. All rights of vehicular access shall be dedicated as 46. follows: a. Along Highland Avenue except at street access locations. b. Along Victoria Parkway from Southern Pacific Railroad to west tract boundary except at street access locations and at lots 759, 760. c. Along street "K" and along west side of Street "P" except at Street access location. d. Along all lot lines contiguous to Street "R" except for lots 451, 452, 758 and 1160. e. Along north side of Street "J" except at Street access location. *746 f. Along lots 741 and-7-45 contiguous to Street "JJJ" APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981- PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: �3effrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November, 1981, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES. COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E [1 Ell CITY OF RANCHO HO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT <� DATE: November 10, 1981 F_ TO: Members of the Planning Commission w 1977 FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN Work c,n the Etiwanda Specific Plan is proceeding. The Etiwanda Spe- cific Plan Committee has held six meetings during the past two and one -half months. During this time they have discussed goals and ob- jectives for the Etiwanda Specific Plan in several topic areas. The first few meetings seemed to be bogged down in a lot of preliminary discussion about more general items. In order for the Committee to effectively discuss the topics regarding the Etiwanda Specific Plan they adopted an overall schedule for the next three months to discuss all policy areas in the plan. The Committee also held a townhall meeting to receive public input at the onset of the planning process. In the last few meetings, the Committee has taken action on prelimi- nary concepts which will ultimately be reflected in the draft plan. Several of these concepts are represented on the attached map and include: The approval of an "umbrella loop" road along the northern edge of the City Limits connecting Cherry Avenue to future Day Creek Blvd. This would divert traffic from the Etiwanda. area. The location of commercial centers including a neigh- borhood commercial site at a new north /south street and Highland Avenue, also the location of two Other convenience commercial centers and freeway related commercial. The approval of a concept to provide a new north!south street east of East Avenue which would act to discourage traffic along East Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue_ The Committee has also adopted policies in other areas including windrow protection, restricting access along the Foothill Freeway Corridor, and protecting the "cha- racter" of both East Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue. ITEM H J1 111 7.' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . — — — — . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......... . I d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �1-1 I rA 4:�ge . . . . .. A MIA nMU k A I AW I-110UW11II-1, 11:. . ................ ...... . . ... . T--T- : ; 11 1 1 . r. - HI; i S. E,11WANDA * , r;�lrcu is PLAIN r6 RESIDENTIAL Very Low Office OPEN SPACE Hilltide Recidential INDUSTRIAL IndustrivI Lzx�—MPMArk open 1777spece �Hlflh �L -M.di.. Neighborhood Commercial General Indnithle I ------- Flood 1,4utllity Contra arridor ........ Medium 21onal C "monlre lan Heavy ME. industrial , November 10, 1931 Etiwanda Specific Plan Page Two AMU During the upcoming months the Committee will be looking at policies in the following areas; parks and open space, equestrian areas and trails, architecture and design, public services and safety, and a land use plan. Eventually these policies will come together within a document shortly after the first of the year., This document will be available for the Committee to act on p -ior to the Staff prepar- ing detailed development standards for all of the Etiwanda area. Staff will be reporting back to the Planning Commission from time to time with a status report including a summary of the Committee's action to date for the Planning Commission's consideration. Respl?ctfW ly submitted, i ty Development Director JI:TJB:jk Attach. t v