No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981/11/25 - Agenda Packet r, — )r t it r • r i, s Cr7 s ir�r .r � I r i 11y 1� 7 li iu tM :y rR ' 14tr 7 C� ^Isle( .. } 1 1. I 1 '.L -mil �' rr L' .r r �: .. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FLANNING GONNA ISSIGN Iz AGE, NOA U Y 1977 NOVEMBER 25, 1981 LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A C T I O N I. Pledge of'Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl X Commissioner Sceranka X Commissioner King X Commissioner Toistoy X Commissioner Rempel X III. Approval of Minutes Approved 5-0 October 14, 1981 Approved 4-0-0-1 October 28, 1981 c IV. Consent Calendar The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the ccamarission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, then it should be �f removed for discussion. V. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which con- cerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related Project. please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. b11 such -opinions shAll be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each , . project. APPROVED 5-0 A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-17 - SHIBATA The temporary placement of a 480 sq, .ft. trailer ' on 1.29 acres of land in the C-1 zone to be located :< at the southwest corner of Haven. Avenue and Lemon Avenue. t ,r,a Planninq Commission Agenda November 25, 1981 Page Two APPROVED TO DENY 5-0 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81-13 - ROTHSCHILD - The development sf a 3fl00 sq. ft. commercial buildinn and self-service gasoline station on .70 acres of land in the C-2 zone located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN 208-241-20. APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND 12 PLANEDN DEVELOPMENT AND EI PLANNED DEVELOPMENT O.change o zune from R Ito R-3 PD fo 4 NVrE TRACTF the Edevel- 5-0 opment of 328 condominium units on 23.6 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Turner and Arrow Route - APN 208-34-9 & 11 . APPROVED 5-0 D. AMENDMENT TO THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN - Amend- With recommended wording es meets to include modification of the Land Use d:an; fi- chan nition for "Building Contractor's Storage Yard" 9 "Building Contractor`s Services", the provision for Building Contractor's Services in certain areas of the Plan,' and to provide for railroad service spur locations along 7th Street; east of nevore Freeway by allowing the landscape setback to be maintained no less than 20' from the ultimate face of curb wi.CP adjar:•nt to rail service. APPROVED 4-0-0-1 E. DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE INDUSTRIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - The purpose of the Assessment DiStrict is to prov de a funding mechanism for cap- ital improvements within the Assessment Area. The Assessment District is generally located between Arrow Route on the north, 4th Street on the South, Turner on the west, and Rochester on the east. VI. Old Business ^` VII. New Business APPROVED 5- 0 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW • - - - e eve opmen o a.2,250, sq. rt. o rice u1 ding on 3.09 acres of' land in t the Industrial Park zone to be located at 10220 4th Street - APN 210-072-23. aF r� Planning Commission Agenda November 25, 1981 Page Three a' APPROVED 5-0 G. TIME EXTENSION REQUESTS TOR THE FOLLOWING_ Tentative Tract 10045 Tentative Tract 10363 Tentative Tract 11434 ' H. VACATION OF THE EAST/WEST ALLEY - located 149' 'I APPROVED 5-0 south of Ninth Street between the Santa Fe Railroad o egT vacation proceedings right of way and Calaveras Avenue. VIII. Council Referrals IX. Director's Reports PC set December 17>1981 TERRA VISTA HEARING SCHEDULE for informal discussion. Public Comments on Terra Vista. Time and place to be determined 2ws is the time and place for the general public to by Staff. address the Commission. Items'to be discussed here are those which do not aiseady appear on this agenda. XI, Upcoming Agenda .'; 9:15 p.m. XII. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set at 11 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. N 4� I i N 1 ! 1 � w LL ro •I W �J 1 7� •• �'� O ti K + q. �•� z 0 o , O p a � • LL . >s •• 3AV VONVMIA3 e .7 f•� �.�; y :i 5•i7 woQ 7•�' I. :` ~ :�;� 3AV b3153H70 tl1 ,.h• IN � uj 36 ED !i W ' YW ��•�;i\ • Y �� W 1,7 7��. • 1 J •; 11 2 p � 3G'•N3AVN 3h! •IIVfIIN:ItlV 1 • CL 3AV QUVA3NIA ` Z r gyp. v x � a 3nN3AV amm e CITY. OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting October 14, 1981 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Jeff King called the Regular meeting of the City of. kancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 7 p.m. The meeting was held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. Chairman King then led in the pledge to the flag. ROLI. CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Herman Rempel, Jeff erey Sceranka, Peter Tolstoy, Jeffrey King ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None STAFF PRESENT: Edward Hopson, Assistara City Attorney; Joan. Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Jack Lam, Community Development Director; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Tolstoy, carried, to approve the Minutes of the June 24, 1981 meeting. �I AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, TOLSTOY, DAHL, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: N014E ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL -•carried- Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried, to approve the Minutes of July 8, 1981. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, DAHL, SCERANKA, KING NOES: COMMUSSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY -carried- Mili II(� Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Rempel, carried to approve the Minutes of July 22, 1981. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, R9MMPEL, SCERANtA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY, KING -carried- ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Lam advised that the first regular Planning Commission meeting in November will fall on the Veterans Day holiday and requested that this meeting be rescheduled to November 10, instead. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to change the meeting date from November 11 to November 10, 1981. x Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt the Consent Calendar. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANKA, 'DAHL, TOLSTOY, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried- A. TIME EXTENSION Rr.;.QnEST FOR TENTATIVE TIP-ACT 1,10. 11577 - LANDMARK - A custom lot abudivision of 1.5 acres into 7 lots in the proposed R-1 cone generally located on the west side of Turner Avenue, south of Ease Line Road. APN 1077-041-58. B. TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR PARCEL MAP NO 5733 - MCNAY - Dividing a parcel located approximately 694 feet south of Victoria Avenue, east of Etiwanda Avenue, into two parcels. APN 227-171-17. C. TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR PARCEL MAP NO. 5795 - GRANGER - Dividing two parcels located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east of Hermosa Avenue into four parcels. APN 201-1.81-47 and 48. Planning Commission Minutes -2- October 14, 1981 '1 PUBLIC HEARINGS D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-16 - STUART - The interim use of an office/industrial building fcr a church facility in the General Industrial zone located at 9507 Arrow Route, Suite H. Senior. Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Chairman King opened the public hearing. There being no comments from the floor, th-e public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81-113, approvinS Conditional Use Permit No. 81-16, subject to the conditions of approval. E. ENVIRONKF.NTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PEP.MIT 140. 81-14 - CUCAMONGA COUNTY WlTER DISTRICT - The development of an equipment yard with an existing 8,245 square foot building, on a 2.1 acre site, for storrge and repair of equipment and vehicles, assembly and welding, gas pump, and office. APN 201-152-19, 20 and 07. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report. Mr. Lam, Director. of Community Development, advised that a new resolution had been prepared which would modify some of the conditions and explained the changes. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if presently there was landscaping on the north side of the driveway. Mr. Vairin replied that liquidambar trees and ground cover are present. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the Resolutioa means that the landscaping should extend to the driveway. Mr. Vairin replied that was correct. Mr. Lam stated that there will also be landscaping south of the driveway. Mr. Lam explained Condition No. 5 stating that it shows chain link fencing on the property lire with the condition of dense landscaping. He indicated that the Water District does not want to tear up the land- scaping because of their expansion. There was further discussion of the conditions with changes made to Condition No. 11, adding .. . with the exception of the two driveway apprcaches on the southwest corner of the property which shall be Planning Cormissi.on Minutes -3- October 14, 1981 rlr :r1111 MEN Iiii:: III IF, JF7: , Condition 12 was amended Craffic only ^allowing the one 32-foot signed and striped for on a roach, to eliminate the 28-foot driveway pP driveway to remain on the southeast corner of the property• wish to expand to the east Commissioner Sceranka an d i sf bec?u8e atheythe Water District does not want the dense landscap g and they do not want to have to tear it up. Mr. Lam replied that this -was correct. to the Commissioner TOIStoy asked if the Water Company owns the property east. f it at the present time. Mr. Lem replied that they do not Owl 1. Chairman Eing opened the public hearing. Water District, Mr. Lloyd Michael, rep resenting the Cucamonga County ro erty to the east resent time they do not own the lamed the existing stated that at tl;e p acquired. Re exp tine113L they would not nor do they know whether it can be acq landscaping and stated that it wash is isdar chain ilink fence. have to landscape the area where ast property to the landscaping on the Toper Y owner's Chairman King asked relative nd.scaping on the adjoining p line, is there presently land. Mr. Michael replied that there is, and explained how far it went to the fence. the property line would Icing asked if planting oleanders along King stated that he Chairman hardship. chairman work or if it would be an undue device but asked if understood the need for an economical screening oleanders might work for the screening. that the objection to that and felt ; Mr. Michael stated that he had no with better landscaping and a Plan for water conservation leasing to the would end up i ht planting that could be aesthetically p with the right P public. argument with the Commissioner Rempel asked Mr. Michastaff- Ya f he had and rest of: the coi.di.tions proposed by Mr. Michael replied that they are satisfied and that they have quite a few oleanders. 2 Permit, the use a condition that if the acquisition of the Mr. Hopso:� stated that since this is a Conditional s- Commi�sion could imp october 14, 1981 Planning Commission Minutes -" property to the east does not take place, then the oleanders would be planted. Commissioner Rempel stated that he did not have a problem as this was a g__ d use for that site. Commissioner Tolstoy stated the he felt that the reason this is a CUP is because they will be allowing a use that is not ordinarily allowed in this area. He indicated the people next door want some privacy and the use will. change that. He stated that he thought the Water District should plant a screen of some type to block the view. He. indicated that their rights need to be protected. Commissioner King stated that this is one of the nicest, if not the nicest, buildings that we have within the community, but lie agreed with Commissioner T'olstoy. Re stated that if they say that if In two years the property is not acquired., and we would put in screening he did not feel that it is that great an expenditure to plant the screening, to pro- tect the adjoining land owners. He indicated that it should be required on the cast side. Commissioner Dahl stated that he felt that item 5 of the original reso- lution should be amended to require dense landscaping on the eastern boundary. He indicated that oleanders or other fast growing shrubs should be used for screening. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel carried unanimously, to adopt a resolution with an amendment to Section No. 6 to ensure that storage materials shall be screened from view by appropriate planting material. Mr. Lloyd Michael stated that he had just been handed the conditions by Mr. Lam and he was not prepared to have a slump stone wall. Chairman King asked if any of the Commissioners wished to reconsider the uwtion and address this at this tine. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by King, carried, that the previous motion be reconsidered for the purpose of discussing Item 2, the slump stone wall. Commissioners •1•olstoy anal Dahl voted no on this motion. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he wished to discus this because he did not see much difference between a block wall th.t has a stucco treatment and the slump stone. He asked Mr. Michael if he would rather sce a block wall. Mr. Michael stated that a slump stone wall, is beautiful, but they are Planning Commission Minutes -5- October 14, 1981 t�`E , dealing with the publi_'s money and a slump stone wa.l would be con- siderably more expensive. He felt that a block wall could be matched in color very closely to what is presently there. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would like to see some kind of planting material on the block wall because of Vie possibility of grafitti. Mr. Vairin stated that the condition for the slump stone wall had been in the original resolution and that there had been discussion on it as well. He indicated that the opinion of. tie Design Review Committee was that a slump stone wall would be aesthetically more appealing and would blend in better with what is presa-it. Commissioner Dahl asked who sits on that committee. Mr. Vairin replied that Commissioners Rempel and Sceranka do. Commissioner Tolstcy stated that the City, the Council and Commission has been trying to get the private sector to do their projects in such a way that they would enhance the City. lie stated he felt that there would be a problem with making an exception on this project. He indicated that the City believes that the Commission asks someone for an upgrade, he will point his finger and say that they let the public sector get away. He felt that this could happen with this building and if they allow corners to be cut, they will hear about it. Mr. Michael asked if the Commission normally specifies the type of buildit&b material to be used in walls. Commissioner Tolstoy replied that the Commission has in the past. Commissioner F.empel reiterated that this is a Commission prerogative and the do it for private developments. Mr. Michael indicated that the Water District would comply with the request for a slump stone wall. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, cartie4 unanimously, to require the slump stone wall., as stated in the resolution. F. ENVTRONMENT.AL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-07 - (TT 11869) - ROBERTS GROUP - A change of zone from R-1-10,000 to R- 3/P.D. for a planned 4;-it development of 136 condominium units or. 9.75 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Highland Avenue. APN 201-252-23, 25 and 26. Planning Commission Minutes -6- October 14, 1981 kiy� Senior. Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed ,he staff: report. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if grading on this project could be addressed. Mr. Vairin asked if he meant anything in particular or the concept. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he had noticed that there are some 3- story elements in this project and asked if they were suggested to minimize the grading. Mr. Vairin replied that this had beer. ^uggested by the applicant. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if that meant tiat the project will require less grading. Mr. Vairin replied that he was not sure if it meant legs grading or if it was being suggested in terms of scale. He felt that the applicant could better answer the questions. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Ms. Tony Quezada, representing the developer, the Roberts Group, stated that they wire in concurrence with staff's and the Design Review Commit_ee's recommes..ation and have. no problem with the conditions. Ms. Quezada asked for clarification of Engineering Condition No. K8 concerning drainage. She asked if the wording should be southwest corner of the property rather than Archibald and Highland. Ms. Quezada then answered Commissioner Tolstoy's question by stating that it was a design function and would not affect the grading of the project. Mr. Phillip Marcacci, 636E Jadeite, Alta Loma, stated that he was con- cerned about traffic as a result of this project and school overcrowding that may result. He indicated that this project is compounded by the next agenda item which will also adversely impact these areas. Commissioner Dahl explained the school certification letter which is required before building permit issuance, stating that school over- crowding is the responsibility of the school district. Mr. Vairin explained the rigorous review process that this and other items go through in order to determine the availability of utilities and other services. Mr. Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer, explained that the traffic situation is one thing that is examined closely prior to approval of a project. He indicated that with the widening of the street that will result from Planaing Commission Minutes -7- October 14, 1981 .1, this project, impaction will be reduced. Commissioner Tolstoy asked what the ylau is for Archibald.. Mr. Bougeau replied that Archibald is proposed to be 72 feet wide and compared it with other north-south streets which are 44 feet wide such as Amethyst and Beryl. Mr. Fred Nelson, Alta Loma resident, stated that he was not particulaz opposed to This project but asked what will be done with Archibald and Highland Avenues. Mrs. Judith Heinz, Alta Loma resident, also addressed the traffic problem that she foresaw at Highland and Archibald. She indicated that presently there is a school bus stop at that location. Further, that heavy trucks will be using that routq with the proposed development and voiced her con- cern for the safety of children. Mrs. Sheryl Moody, Jadeite Street resident, questioned the comment that the schools will be able to handle additional children that may result from this project. She asked if it were true that school children are presently being bused. Commissioner Dahl. replied that when it comes to schools, we as a City, have no real responsibility as to whaL sei,00l districts will and won't do. lie added that before building permits sire issued, the builder must receive a letter from the F•chool district statinn: Y.hat there will be room. Commissioner Dahl indicated that in the case of the Alta Loma :school District, they will issue a letter if they feel that they can absorb additional children. Cha£fey High School District will also issue a letter; however, they certify on the basis of classroom space within the district rather than the local area, He indicated if no certifica- tion•, letter is issued., there :an be no building permit issuanpc. Commissioner S<:eranka further explained the mechanism involved in the certification process stating that the letter is good for a period of 60 days during which time the building permits must be pulled. If. the i letter is older than 60 days, it becomes invalid and a new rjr,e would have to be obtained. Mrs. Moody questioned the -water pressure that might be lessened as a result of this project, indicating that there currently are problems i with it. Mr. Vairin replied with an explanation of the Growth Management Cos.imittee and how they investigate these kinds of concerns to be sure that service ;t can be provided. Further, that this project would not take water pressutt k away from this area. 'S Planning Commission Minutes -8- October 14, 1481 Mr h Mrs. Moody stated that Archibald cs_nnot handle any more traffic as there is presently only one lane betwe-n 19th Street and Highland Avenue. She asked when Archibald would oe revamped, before, or after, this pro- ject's construction. Mr. Rougeau replied. that when this project goes in it will be fully widened. 1lowever, he :stated, it: will not be widened south of Highland Avenue, it will just be two lanes. He indicated that this would be mitigated by a four--way stop. He explained that this is because the property on the southeast corner is privately owned and in the Foothill Freeway corridor. He indicated that it cannot be expected that they will just give the City this property, the City would have -to purchase it. Mr. Rougeau stated that if after this project is built, there is an unbearable delay in traffic, staff will propose tc the City Council some appropriate means to do a road job. Mr. Rougeau then explained the systems development fee which helps to provide necessary street improvements. Mr. Frederick Stuart, Alta Loma residers, stated that a myth exists relative to the school certification letter in that it carries little or no weight-. He indicated that a private attorney had been hired to investigate its legal merits and concluded that it was not worth the paper upon which it was written. Further, it was this attorney's opinion that the letter would not withstand a court challenge. Mr. Nelson asked why a requirement for improvement is not imposed on rhis development and asked how long it would be before this inter- section is improved. Mr. Rougeau replied that these two projects will. not be entirely responsible for the traffic at this intersection and that is why the free is paid. Mrs. Lee Marcuchian, a resident of Jadeite Street, asked if the fire station -r.)^ Amethyst will be able to handle the adeitional dwellings. She indicated that at a neighborhood fire recently, it took the Fire Department 5 n;:.rn+.cs to respond. She asked if the fire station will remain opened. w Mr. . Lam replied that as far as the City knows, the fire station will remain opened. He also explained the response time cri.trri.a. Mrs. Marcuchian commented that she travels Archibald twice a day and the stop sign that exists at Archibald and Highland is not observed by 50 percent of the people. Planning Commission Minutes -9- October 14, 1981 Mr. Lam explained the Ci.ty's requirement for off-site improvements so that what has been said would not be taken out of c:orrtext. He indicated that when it comes to an intersection such as this w:rere the developer is not the total contributor to the problem, the Cit , imposes a Systems Development Fee. Iie indicated that very few cities _n the State of California have such a fee and that Rancho Cucamonga. is one of the first. lie advised that this fee is outside of tax d3llars, it is contributed by the developer and goes into a special fund for Capital Improvements. He explained that the City Council each year evaluat: as projects that need improvements. He indicated that it is each citizen's right to ask tb ! City Council to set a priority on how these improvements should be made. He indicated that a problem exists in that tl.=re are not enough funds to make all the improvements needed. Mr.. Lam also explained that outside of the public Capital Improvements Program, the City has a Public Safety Committee that advises and makes recormendations to the City Council. Iie stated that these are the mechanisms for people to get their input into the system when there are perception of safety problems. He indicated that no one is saying that a problem 11; non-existent. What he explained is that there are mechanisms for people to set priorities and let their opinions be known relative to the Sys :ems Development Fee that can be used for capital improvements. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Cormmissioner Dahl asked Assistant City Attorney Hopson if the school certification letter is binding or if there is some method of getting around i.t. Mr. Hopson replied that Mr. Stuart's reply was total .y erroneous. He indicated that in this City a developer cannot obtai.ii a final tract map without an approval letter. Further, that this option is written into State law and the attorney with whom Mr. Stuart spoke could not be more incorrect in the opi•iinn be gave. Mr. Hopson indicated that it is legal and binding and he hod no doubt that if this was challenged in court, he could defend the City's posture. Without a letter, ha stated, you cannot build a house. Commissioner Dahl stated that he wished to go on reco:•d relative to the intersection of Archibald and highland that be believed it to be one of the most dangerous in the community. He stated that it was his hope in those projects that are adding impacts to traffic that the Commission can do something ro deal with theee dangerous situat'_ons. He indicated that he would not ;support any of these projects unless this is taken care of. Commissioner Rempel stated that having sat on the Desilm Review Committee and looking at this project's aesthetical aspects and whether circulation is adequate for this facility, this project has gone a long way in meeting the criteria set. He felt that the developer should be commended Planning Commission Minutes -10- O_tober 14, 1981 1: on this. He stated that with regard to the traffic problem at this intersection that it has been stated that .there would be widening at Archibald and at Highland, the length of this tract, and will addition- ally, have to pay the systems development fee which will gc into the City's fund for future improvements and possibly this intersection. He indicated that until the City has some money, it can only wait until there is enough either in the development fee or the road tax funds to make these improvements because the existing funds are woefully in- adequate. Commissioner Dahl stated that he wished to comment on the intersection stating that if it was cut down and smoothed out it wouldn't have to be widened because there would be adequate visibility making less of a problem at that location. He also stated that he wished to go on record that this is a very attractive and one of the best condo projects in the City. Assistant City Attorney Hopson observed that the mechanism with the development project would make the developer improve that intersection, however, the Commission is overlooking one point. He indicated that to improve that intersection the City must have that piece of property that lies south and the developer has no power to condemn that property. He indicated that if the Commission requires the developer to improve that intersection by widening.it with Archibald south, the Commission will have imposed a condition on him that he cannot satisfy. He indicated that it would be nice if whoever owns the property on the south either gave it or said I will contribute by setting a reasonable value on it. He indicated that in giving tentative tract approval, the Commission must impose conditions that can be met. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that when the storm drain project goes in, it will take water off of that intersection and it will be improved somewhat through that and the repavemeut that will be done. He indi- cated that he had somewhat the same problem that Commissioner Dahl has and he would make a statement, although not as strong as the one that Commissioner Dahl has made, in that he knows that the Engineering Department and the Traffic Department has in the past taken care of problems. Although Commissioner Tolstoy acknowledged that there is a problem here, he felt that the Traffic and Engineering•Depactment will continue to take care of these problems and will monitor accidents and keep traffic counts here. He indicated that the two projects before the Commission at this meeting will generate some funds and will allow improvements to be made as they have been at Base Line and other r.reass in the City. He indicated that he would support this project because although it has problems, it is in the right place and he felt that the City can take care of these problems. 6.' Y•: a':' •' Planning Commission Minutes -11- October 14, 1981 y Commissioner. Sceranka stated that he wished to acknowledge that there is a problem at this 'ntersection as he lives to the north and east of -this and drives it 3-4 times a day. He indicated that the Commission must ! try to deal with a solution to this problem in that all of the improve- ments cannot be enforced by any one development because of impacts which occur all along the corridor. Commissioner Sceranka talked about the Systems Development Fee and how it works. He felt that the beat solu- tion to this problem would be to look at priorities, the road figures and traffic flows that would result and go on from there. He stated that the t City does not have the luxury of funding to use to make improvements to what have long been problems as new developments come In. lie stated that Tif these projects were not allowed to go in, there would be no money from systems development fees to solve any of the City's problems. Commissioner King stated that basically he agreed with Commissioner Tolstoy that this is a good project that should go forward. However, in light of the dangerous intersection as it now exists, he felt that the conditions .' of approval should be amended to state that the developer of the property at the northeast corner make an attempt to obtain some property from the owner at the southeast corner, and perhaps in lieu of contributing funds to the systems development fee they be contributed for the possible acquisi- tion of the land or portion of the land on the east portion of the Inter- section for purposes of best dealing with the intersection as it presently j; exists. Commissioner Dahl, for clarification, stated that at this point in time the Commission would be looking at an easement and the widening of the intersection to get rid of the danger. He indicated that the City could also seek out the easement and felt that it should. Be indicated that if i; such a condition were added, he would support this project. He reiterated rf. that if an attempt were made by the developer to acquire the easement and if the City askpa for dedication as a condition of approval, he would i`. support this. Commissioner. Sceranka stated that a problem still exists with requiring ' this property owner to acquire the property to the south and he objected to this. Chairman King stated that the developer should try to obtain the property ' and if he is able to do so, the money he would pay in systems development. �• fees could be used to purchase the property. If he comes up against a hard-nosed guy who doesn't want to deal with him, then obviously, he has ' made his best attempt and the project should go through as it is and the intersection will be dealt with at a later time. lie indicated that the acquisition of the property is not a mandatory thing. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if such a condition was legal. •;i .Y PlanningCommission Minutes -12- October 14, 1981 •tju _ Assistant City Attorney Hopson asked if Commissioner Tolstoy meant, can the Commission require that the developer make a best effort and have the City help. He indicated that it is possible. Chairman. Dahl stated that they were not talking about the entire freeway corridor property but just the property at the intersection which would allow widening. Paul Rougeau stated that to make it worthwhile, it would take the whole width of the right-of-way at the freeway and that it would taper to an easement on the south to make this feasible. 'I Commissioner Sceranka asked how much systems development fees would i., result from this project. V' Mr. Rougeau replied that it would be between $50,000-100,000, as a guess. Commissioner Sceranka asked if the City could condemn the property necessary as a solution to this problem. Mr. Hopson replied that the City could condemn the property if it felt that it were necessary as a solution to this problem but it could not do so for this project. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy, carried unanimously, to amend the resolution of approval for this tentative map with the condition as stated by Commissioner King. M1' Ms. Ouezada asked that the Resolution also specify that the systems devel- opment fees be earmarked for use directly in improving this particular intersection. Commissioner Sceranka asked how long the developer will be required to try to acquire this property. - . Mr. Lam stated that there is a legal question relative to the dedication. He stated that he had heard that the developer is to try to acquire the property and then he heard that the systems development fees are to be earmarked for use on this intersection. He asked if the Commission is b; trying to have both of these things incorporated into the process of this approval. Mr. Lam stated that the question on this is that the Planning Commission does not have the authority to earmark fees but could recommend to the City Council that these fees be used for this project. Commissioner Sceranka stated that the motion should be that the Planning y{, Commission recommend to the City Council that the systems development fees e be earmarked for the improvement of this intersection at Highland and Archibald. Planning Commission Minutes -13- October 14, 1981 Ms. Quezada asked what the time limit should be for the acquisition attempt. Commissioner Rempel stated that the attempt has to be made before they go ahead. Mr. Lam asked if they want it prior to the issuance of building permits and asked for a better definition of time. He indicated that it should be before final map approval to facilitate the street improvements so that they are not skipped over. Mr. Lam explained to the audience how the tentative tract map approval is done and how the acquisition of property must take place in. relation to the issuance of building permits. Ccmm..-sioner Dahl stated that he recommended that the City also try to obtain the dedication necessary for the widening of the intersection. Commissioner Rempel stated that this was part of the motion. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to adopt the Resolution of Approval for the site plan and rezoning of this property. Mr. Vairin stated to the audience that they would receive notice of the Zone Change on this when it comes before the City Council. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS14ENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-08 - (TT 11928) - SHAFFER/WESTLAND VENTURE - A change of zoa= from R-1-10,000 to R-3/P.D. for a total planned development of 67 townhouse units on :,.85 acres of land located on the north side of Highland Avenue, east of Archibald Avenue. APN 201-252-32. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, revie-:ed the staff report pointing out for the record that this particular project would be utilizing the Alta Loma channel for drainage and would be required to be fully improved. He indicated that this was a requirement in meeting threshold and should the applicant not agree to this condition, this project would have to go back for further consideration. Chairman King, opened the public hearing. Mr. Toin Davis, 9381 Business Center Drive, concurred with the staff findings and stated that he had nothing to add. He asked for clarification of Item 27. Mr. Vairin explained the definition of affordable housing and asked if the applicant was also accepting the improvement of the channel at thin point. Planning Commission Minutes -14- October 14, 1981 r7 f� i . Mr. Davis replied that they were accepting the conditons of the channel. There being no Further comments, the public hearing was closed. Chairman King stated that one thought for consideration is the condition that was added to the last tract. He felt that it would be appropriate to add a similar condition for this tract. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he did not feel it right for two developers to have the same task in trying to acquire the same property. He felt that s the systems development fee would be appropriate here and that thcr. other f developer try negotiations with the other property owner so there are ! not two neogtiators for the same property. 11 Mr. Davis stated that the owner of the property that he is developing has already been required to improve the storm drain. Commissioner Tolstoy replied that Mr. Davis' development is contributing ,1. to the storm drain problem.. Mr. Vairin explained the systems development fee, stating that no new fees are being added. 4i Mr. Lam stated that since the Commission added the condition to the first tract, it should be done on this one as well. w' `�. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded 'by Sceranka, carried unanimously to adopt Resolution No. 80-117, approving the tentative tract with the condition that the systems development fee be recommended to be applied to the improve- ment of the ._ntersection of Archibald and Highland. ` Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 118, approving the zone change. t s 8:50 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 9:03 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-05 - (TT 9369 & 11173) - M. J. BROCK - A change of zone from It-5-to 's• R-3,'P.D. for a total planned evelopment of 119 patio homes on 18.2 acres of land in the R-3 zone located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Archibald Avenue. APN 202-181-23 and 24. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. �4 r Planning Commission Minutes -15- October 14, 1981 Chairman King asked what the setback is at Archibald and 19th Street from the wall. Mr. Vairin replied that at some points it i.s 25-35 feet and varies to 45 feet from the face of the curb. Mr. Gilbert Rodriguez, representing the developer, stated that it is a minimum of 17 feet from the right-of-way. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Mike Conlon, representing the M. J. Brock Company, stated that he generally concurred with staff's recommendation. He asked for clarifi- cation of the pedestrian access from the interior of the project to Archibald. He stated that after talking to staff, they sealed the wall up making back yards and would like to leave it that way. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he did not agree with that because in doing that they are creating a society that must get in their cars to protect themselves and not walk anywhere without the feeling that they will be ripped off. He felt that there are meRy projects with trail systems ana it would have been difficult for '.hi,n to approve projects like Victoria without having this pedestrian access. He seated that the argument that sealing the wall is for security reasons is not a valid one for not having pedestrian access. Mr. Conlon stated that these were just some of the considerations and be did not wish to dwell on that one point. Mr. Conlon further stated that the land planner and engineer were in the audience to answer any questions that might arise. Mr. Jim Eberly, Rancho Cucamonga resident, asked about roads and the assertion that Commissioner Rempel made regarding roads. Commissioner Sceranka stated that Mr. Eberly should speak to the. Engineering Department as the question he posed had nothing to do with this project. Mr. Eberly stated that anyone_ going down would have to go through Victoria. Mr. Vairin replied that people will want the ability to go to Ramona but will be able to get to Archibald. Mr. Eberly stated that he had been told that the area would be a produce_ market and he was a lot happier that it would be residential. Mr. Vairin _stated that they would like to make an appointment to talk to Mr. Eberly relative to the General Plan. 1 Planning Commission Minutes -16- October 14, 1981 r* MIN ! Mr. Dennis Doyle, 6892 London, Alta Loma, stated that there is one sewer drain for the entire tract at the present time and it is one-half to three-ouarters full of mud. He asked with the new tract going in if the drainage will be resolved. He indicated that he did not feel that the existing drain would be capable of taking another cup of water. fj Mr. Rougeau replied that ii the catch basin and pipe is not big enough, J they will install the proper size to take care of the problem. He further indicated that there will be other projects going in that will improve this area so that the existing pipes will no longer fill with mud. ' Mr. Frank Williams of Associated Engineers, explained the drainage system that will be included in this project to relieve the anxiety felt by some of property owners. �f Mr. Ron Hart, 6730 London Street, expressed concern with a loss of privacy created by this development and asked if there would be trees and shrubs r• to protect the homeowners. sn t Mr. Vairin commented on the grading which will occur, the existing grading, W the 20-foot setback and the requirement for a 6-foot wall which could be imposed by the Planning Commission and dense landscaping along the wall. I' Mr. Hart stated that the wall would have to be 8 feet high on his side. Comrassioner Rempel stated that if the Commission lets a conventional tract in, they can have 2-story houses also. He indicated that the type {` of development does not necessarily determine whether the dwellings will b,� one-story or two-story. Mr. Gil Martinez, Florian, Escobar, Martinez, land planners and landscape architects, stated there is a 50% mix on the east boundary of this devel- opment. He indicated that the lots on the east were given extra depth so { there is more here than within the interior of the development. Additionally, he stated, the eastern boundary would be densely landscaped and grading t: will be reduced. He further stated that from an engineering and 'Landscaping standpoint they had done everything that they could. r' Commissioner Sceranka asked if there was anything they could do to make t; those units on the eastern boundary one-story rather than two-story. Mr. Martinez, replied thathe would have to consult with his client as that was not a question he was able to answer. Commissioner Sceranka asked if it would be possible to correct those that have line of sight to one-story rather than two-story. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that those units could be designed so that there weren' t any windows on the side that faces into the adjoinfng yards. Planning Commission Minutes -17- October 14, 1981 r j Commissioner Sceranka stated that in the past, the Commission has .required that there be one-story units only on those boundaries with other single- story homes. Commissioner Rempel stated that the Commission has done that with rondo units only. Commissioner Dahl states ':hat basically they were talking about the same thing because there are greater setbacks. Commissioner Sceranka stated that if he were a person who lived in a single-story home where a new project was coming in he would want the new project to have only single-story homes. Mr. Martinez stated that this is probably true and on the surface he would probably agree; however, this has been zoned for multiple-family and the flip side of this is that the previous plan had two-story homes in a line all the way through the eastern boundary. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if a condition could be put in that there Would b' no line of sight on that side. Mr. Vairin stated that he was just going to make such a suggestion and request that this be reviewed For two weeks to see what the alternatives might be. he felt that perhaps this could be handled in such a way so as not to be arbitrary. 'Commissioner Sceranka stated that the project does not need to be held up. Mr. Martinez stated that they are asking for tentative approval and this is a visual impact rather than design problem. He indicated that they are asking for conceptual approval. Commissioner Sceranka stated that this is not conceptual approval but tentative approval. Mr. Lam stated that the matter of ore-story versus two-story is something that should be done up front. He indicated that in terms of delay, the Commission will want to see everything at once. That way the Commission is not delaying the project as it can be done all st once through Design Review. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he would like staff to show him the pedestrian circulation in this project. He did not see the crossing walks. Planning Commission Minutes _yg_ October 14, 1981 }';,?' s' i Mr. Vairiu replied that this is one of the conditions of approval that a continuou, circulation pattern be provided, Mr. Hopson stated that this can be conditioned so that parking is allowed d, on one side of the street only for visitor parking. He indicated that this could be done through C.C.& R. 's. i.` Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Martinez if they intended to put: in a ,. sidewalk around the perimeter of this project. Mr. Martinez stated that they plan to put them on one side. zc Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried to adopt Resolution No. 81-119 with an amendment to the Conditions of Approval that the line of sight be brought back to Design Review for the easterly lots prior to final map approval. Commissioner D--mpel voted no. Commissioner King asked what Commissioner Sceranka considered to be proper treatment. ' Commissioner Sceranka replied that it could be window or setback trea"- ent I. or anything that would reduce the line of sight. f. Commissioner King asked if it was Commissioner Sceranka's intention that they will not have people :Looking at them. Mr. Vairin replied that some of the units can be designed so that there is a frosted high bathroom window that will not allcw people to see into the back yards and that there are additional ways of mitigating the problem. Commissioner Dahl seconded the motion. Commissioner Rempel asked what the difference is between two units which ;. were presently backing up to each other and the units that would be built Y that would be across from each other. Y' Commissioner Sceranka replied that the difference is that the one group of units was already there and these people in the new tract would be buying their homes after the eyisting units. t. ?: The motion carried and Commissioner Rempel voted no. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81-120, recommending the adoption of a zone change. i y Planning Commission Minutes -19- October 14, 1981 All �1a .. I. ENVIRONMENTpIL iz :EcSMENT Am! PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 80-•10 - (TT 11734) - A change of zone from A-1 to .ie-�;:,*+_ for. a total planned development of 98 toanhomes on 8.5 ± acres of land located at. tt:_ -nrthwest corner of Vineyard and Arrow Highway. APN 207-211-28. Senior Planner Michael Vairin revit-wed the staff report. Commissioner Oceranka stated that the tentative tract map marked Exhibit "A" is not the correct map as it had been revised. Mr. Vairin replied that Commissioner Sceranka was correct as the original plan was very rigid in the type of lots and building placement. Chairman King, opened the public hearing. Mr. Don Veve-ka, representing the owner and developer, concurred with the conditions of approval. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Sceranka stated that from a Design Review point of view, tbis project had been reviewed a number of times and changes made with some good results. Commissioner King stated that he was bothered by the setbacks along Vineyard as this is a crucial street in the City and he felt that they were too close. He indicated that there should be 25 feet from the fence. He indicated that there is a need to create an open feeling and reduce things to a more human. scale. Commissioner. Sceranka stated that there is 37-foot minimum from the curb 11ne. He stated that they did anticipate that there would be a problem with fencing too close to the street. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that it appeared to him that the human scale had been met and it was not overbearing. He said he might agree with Chairman King in his first statement. j Commissioner King stated that he would strike the first part of the question. u 'a. Commissioner Rempel asked the architect what the height of the fence is. Mr. Charles Copeland replied that the height of the fence is 6 feet but that ? it is only realized from the occupant's side, He indicated that they have i' a berm up to the fence with rolling mounds and that the fence is not. uniform. Commissioner Dahl stated that he agrees with Commissioner King in theory r, but this is the first time he has seen a truly meandering fence. He stated that he would be curious to see it after it has been compl.eced, Planning Commission Minutes -20- October 14, 1981 K '1' }I ' Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by King, carried, to adopt Resolution No. 81-121 approci-,Ig Line site plan and zone change. Chairman King voted no on this motion because of the crucial appearance along Vineyard. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Scernnk:,, carried unanimously, to approve the tentative tract map. * * * x s Chairman King stated that he would like to make a motion that Item H be reconsidered because of what he felt to be a precedent in requiring no line of sight into adjacent yards. He felt that this is contrary to the mar,; quarter-acre sites that currently sit with single-family homes and while he agreed with the philosophy of having to cut back and do every- thing possible to protect the privacy of the individual, he thought that perhaps the condition as stated went too far and set a dangerous precedent. Commissioner Rempel seconded the motion. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: KING, REMPEL NOES: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, SCERANKA, TOLSTOY ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -failed- J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP NO. 4783 - SANCHEZ - A subdivision of 10 acres into 2 parcels in the A-1 zone located on the west side of Turner, south of Base Line - APN 208-061-03. Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeau reviewed the staff report. Mr. Lam stated that he would like to add to the staff report that the applicant would like to pursue an alternative meaz:s 3f access for the secondary access which could go along Teak Way or straight west to the other street. However, since the western access is not a part of this parcel map, it will be in the future, but is not now, it cannot be a condition of this parcel map. He indicated that this protects the City +: in terms of access and allows flexibility to go north or west. Mr. Lam Y•" stated that the improvement agreement would be for nine months. t_. Commissioner Tolstoy asked ii when a re'e;ence is made to going west, if a' they are talkf.ng about the north end of tentative tract No. 11610. He ' indicated that what they are really saying is that we are asking for dedication on Teak Way but if the other tract develops in such a way they want to use the other access. He then asked what happen if we s Planning Commission Minutes -21- October 14, 1981 ask for dedication and the sight-of-way and it is not feasible to go west and Teak Way is secondary, who pays for it. Mr. Rougeau replied that the developer of the tract below would. The parcel map will provide the offer of dedi,cacion but the improvements will be provided by the devel.opE_. Chairman King opened the public hearing, Mr.. Roland Sanchez, stated that the owner of record is not RLS and Assoc!ates and includes his father, brother, an aunt and two cousins and himself. He indicated that this does not reflect in any way what they plan to do there and explained the secondary access, which was required by the Fire District. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Sanchez if he owns the land where Teak Way is proposed. Mr. Sanchez replied that at the present time they do not. Mr. Hopson stated that if Mr.. Sanchez does not own that property, he has no business processing a parcel map on it. Mr. Rougeau stated that the offer of dedication on this proposed parcel map is not where the dotted line is shown on the map but on parcel 1 which is dirently north of 1161.0. Mr. Sanchez made a clarifying point stating that the orig. al parcel map was processed about a year and a half ago and at that time it was stated that there was no development but that it was a custodial type land division and the parcel map expired. He indicated that the present parcel map was a requirement of parcel 11610 and was required to further develop it. Mr.. Hopson stated that he saw no legal impediment to require dedicaticn t:S by the owners on parcels 1 and 2 and that they could make offers of dedication if they so desire. �1 Mr. Sanchez stated that Teak Way is only half a street and he did not g; think that the area to the north of tract 11610 would not develop and really did not want to have a street put in there. Mr. Lam stated that the confusion arises because Mr. Sanchez is involved in both parcels and this was not a condition of prior approval. The prior approval was on the bards of the knowledge that the condition i secondary access would come at this time should the prior parcel map F�. y, expire. Whether the owner of the other property or this property pay for it is a matter to be considered between the private parties and so the requirement is on the applicants at this time. Planning Commission Minute; -22- October 14, 1981 y e i ,F Mr. Hopson stated that he has difficulty in understanding what has happened with this 10-acre piece. He indicated that his office would not have allowed a parcel to be developed on an approved tentative tract map on a piece of a 1.0-acre parcel because that would have been an obvious illegal subdivision of the larger piece. He stated that he is assuming that everyone joined at that time in processing the tentative tract because it was their land. He further stated that all of the owners of parcels one and two would have to sign on this parcel map and he stated that even though be can understand that there may be some difference, legally there is no impediment at all and as Mr. Lam and Mr. Rougeau have stated, if the Commission does not approve this parcel map, then tentative tract 11610 will. never have the conditions of approval satisfied and it will go away ultimately because it will expire. Mr. Sanchez stated that as he had stated in the letter attached to the staff report, Tract 11610 stands on its own and to require the 30-foot easement at this time and based on planning where the secondary access would take place for the general area, if they have to let the map expire and become null and void, that is what they will have to do. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Scaranka, seconded by Dahl, carried unanimously, to t adopt Resolution No. 81,123 with the conditions of approval as proposed in the staff report. i 10: 1.0 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 10:20 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. l• 4 COUNCIL REFERF4LS c K. LNVIR.ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. $0-12 - MltRLBOROLIGH - A total development of 393 townhouses on 40 acres in the R-2 zone, located on the east side of Archibald, on the south side of. Church, west side of Ramona. APN 1077-341-01, 1,077-631-03. Jack Lam, Director of Community Development, reviewed the staff report. A Commissioner Tolstoy asked if street access through the project as a route x to school would be accomplished through C.C. & R.'s. Mr. Lam replied that this would have to be coordinated through the Cencral �4 School District. Commissioner Tolstoy provided a scenario whereby the homeowners association r Planning Commission Minutes -23- October 14, 1981 may not want children passing through the development and might close the access to keep people and children not living there out. He felt that this should be stated in the C.C. 6 R. 's so that it is irrevocable. Mr. Hopson stated that in theory this is possible because the City receives the C.C. 6 R.'s so late in the process, but felt that this would have already been worked out and would not be a hardship if pro- vided *pith the C.C. S R. 's Mr. Lam spoke of the alterations to the roof lines and tot lot areas. He indicated that the Design Review Committee did not feel the tot lot areas and the developer had been instructed to provide better areas. He indicated that the developer gad not complied with the parking areas and the 10 units that were requested to be [educed. Mr. Lam stated that he wished to make one slight mrq'ification to item 5 that the tot lot areas and the recreation and open space areas shall be redesigned to provide better continuity and be subject to Design Review prior to approval. To provide such better continuity, 10 additional units shall be deleted from the Site Plan on the Ramona half of the project. :'he units to be deleted and the tot lot areas shall be subject to Design Review. Commissioner Dahl asked what the site plan from the Ramona half meant. Mr. Lam explained this to Commissioner Dahl. Commissioner. Dahl asked what about the tot lots in the area shown on the map. Commissioner Sceranka stated that a distinction had been made at Design Review that all tot lots must have some security around it to provide enclosed space and that there be a minimum of six tot lots. Further, since the developer had not shown any on the plan he provided, this will have to go to Design Review. He indicated that the developer did not think the tot lots should be secured and the Design Review Committee stated that they must be. Commissioner Rempel stated that the intent was not just to put in tot lots and take away from the yards, it was to make e1justments to provide for bcth yards and tot lots. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that be felt that the Planning Commission should make a statement as to their desires and this should go back to Design Review. Mr. Lam stated that the Commission must make a statement as to the number of uAts that this project should contain. Commissioner Rempel stated that at least 10 units should be dropped as advised by Design keview and whether these be single units or pairs Planning Commission Minutes -24- October 14, 1981 it y `I I of units, the space should be converted to tot lots. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he wanted it understood that the developer should not take the open spaces that are there and make tot lats out of them. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how the Planning Commission felt that his concerns regarding the children's pedestrian access through she project should be addressed. by Mr. Hopson. Mr. Hopson stated that item 2 stated that this will be worke,I out between the developer and the. Central School District. Comnissioner. Tolstoy mated that he would like to have that added. Mr. Hopson stated that he would put into item 2 that it should have con- tinuous access and not be obstructed or taken out without ot:taining the City's approval. He indicated that the previous conditions Gf approval will be -superseded by these conditions so that there will nct be con- fusion on what conditions were approved. Mr. Paul Byrnes, 202 Ce:ltury Park East, Los Angeles, representing the developer, addressed the- Commission. He indicated that parl, ing bays along the street would be deleted. He indicated that he war, somewhat concerned that there would not be enough parking for guests and would rather have more parking spaces rather than parking bays. Commissioner Sceranka stated that when this was discussed it was felt that in the area near Archibald the additional parking was nit as necessary. Commissioner Rem pel stated that the point they were making L: that if you pull people in at that area, the tenants will park there and not the visitors. Iie felt that it would do more to clutter up the sireet than assist with parking. Mr. Byrnes stated that that is a judgement call. He felt that they had accomplished what had been requested in Director Review. Commissioner Rempel explained where the parking areas should to eliminated. There was discussion on whether the roadway should be 16 feet or 17 feet. Mr. Byrnes stated that they ha4 gone to great efforts it.. peoc<saing and massaging their plan to meet city criteria. He stated that it a project of this size, cutting out additional units would -mean an additional $1,000 in annual. income in order to purchase these units. He indicated that they are aiieady te1k1no nh^." a family income in the mid-30's. He indicated that if there was no other. way, he was ready to lose units but that it would have a horrendous impact on cost. Planning Commission Minutes -25- October 14, 1981 r1, a; h, Y Mr. Byrnes also agreed to three more fenced tot- lots in addition to those shown on the plan. Mr. Byrnes indicated that he did not know if they can arrange with the school district some agreement on the pass through in the project; however, he agreed with the Commission's concern and felt that the concern could j be alleviated through C.C. & R. 's r Mr. Byrnes asked for an opportunity to demonstrate on the final landscape plans, how this could be done in a desirable manner. He stated further that in his meetings with the residents he told them that the units would face the garages onto Ramona. He indicated that he felt this to be a planning mistake but he would accept the Planning Commission condition on that. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried unanimously, to continue beyond the 11 p.m. curfew. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Mcsed by Dahl, seconded by Rempal, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81-124 as amended with a change to item 5 to read that the tot lots, recreation and open space areas shall be redesigned to provide such better continuity and 10 units shall be deleted from the site plan as determined by the Design Review Committee. Commissioner Scerar.':a explained why the Design Review Committee decided on that figure. Chairman King asked if upon perusz.i of the plan did he thinT, there is any minimum that they must have to accomplish the design of the plan relative to the tot lot space. Following discussion on the number of tot lot spaces required, it was determined that this should come back to Design Review for approval of the locations. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he would agree with Commissioner Rempel on street parking but that he also has to agree with the developer in stating that parking can be a problem. He stated that he would like to say to the Design Review Committee that some parking should be deleted but some should be allowed. He felt that this could be taken care of in Design Review. Commissioner Dahl. stated that the 17-foot roadway should also be included. Commissioner Sceranka stated to the audience that some time ago he had voted in favor of this project but what has been accomplished by the neigh- borhood group who protested this development has made it a far better one s and he appreciated their input. r: a' Planning Commission Minutes -26- October 14, 1981 i. , p '1 a Commissioner Rempel stated that he agreed and that this would make everyone more alert in the future. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he felt everyone had profited and that the developer will, as a result, have a more marketable product. Mr. Lam stated to the audience that the only thing that would be spoken to at the City Council meeting would be the zone change. He added that the issue of the 10 units will not be discussed. Mr. Byrnes asked if parking needs to be so locked in that he would be held to a specific number of parking spaces. He felt that there should be more parking space and he wanted the ability to change his landscaping and otreetscaping to accomplish this if it were possible. Commissioner R=pel replied that all the Commission is saying is that it should not be on the main street. Mr. Lam asked, for the record, if Mr. Byrnes agreed + °I- project and changes that had been recommended and made. Mr. Byrnes replied that he agreed with them. Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Tolstoy, carried unanimously, to adjourn. 11: 15 p.m. The Planning Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Secretary t I•. 1i {?. Planning Commission Minutes -27- October 14, 1981 I CITY Or• RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting October 28, 1981 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the City of. Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission, held at Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California, was called to order by Chairman Jeffrey K'_nr at 7:05 p.m. Chairman King then led in the pledge to the flag. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl, Herman Rempel, Jeff Sceranka, Jeffrey King ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Peter Tolstoy STAFF PRESENT: Ted Hopson, City Attorney; Jack Lam, Director of Community Development; Micbzel Vairin, Senior Planner; Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer; Janice Reynolds, Secretary APPROVF,L 67 MINUTES Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Sceranka, carried to approve the Minutes of August ..12, 1981. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL, SCERAN'KA, REMMEL, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY Motion: Moved by.Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried to approve the Minutes of August 26, 1981. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMFEL, DAHL, SCERANKA, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried to approve the Minutes of September 9, 1981 . is i" G' pt�:;;, Chairman King opened the public hearing. Dennis Chiniaeff, representing American National Housing Corporation, addressed the Commission stating that he had some conditions which he wished clarification on. One condition was the requirement of a natural rock wall along 19th. It was the applicant's opinion that the use of undulating mounding would serve the same purpose. He stated that his second concern was the requirement that the project be placed in a Landscape Maintenance District. He stated that since this project would have a Homeowners' Association and this would maintain the area of 19th in question, it was not necessary to also be placed in a Landscape Maintenance District. Chairman King asked if there were any others in the audience who wished to address the Commission. There being none, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Dahl stated that when the Brethren in Christ Church Site Plan was approved the access on the east end of the property was to be a shared access with this project. He further stated that this access appeared to be an emergency access only and asked if the access was intended to be widened. Mr. Johnson replied that the emergency access on 19th. would be turf- blocked only. Commissioner Dahl. asked Staff to clarify the requirement of the natural block wall being questioned by the applicant. Mr. Vai.rin stated that the Deign Review Committee had thought that the transition from the street grade up to the pad grade was severe and desired some type of landscaping technique to reduce the grade. He further stated that i£ the. developer objected to the block wall, other landscape methods could be substituted. He suggested that a change in wording in the Resolution could be made to state that to create a smoother transition from the street grade to the dwelling unit grade with special landscape features. Commissioner Dahl asked if the proposed area for the tot lot would be a furnished tot lot. Mr. Chiniaeff replied that it would be a furnishe! play area. Commissioner Dahl asked if the area was to be fenced. Mr. Chiniaeff replied that It was not proposed to be fenced. Mr. Vairin stated that the pool and recreation areas of this project were separate areas. j Planning Commis-[en Minutes -3- October 28, 1981 . io firJ t '�1i 1 Commissioner Sceranka stated that it was his opinion that the tot lot and play areas should be either surrounded by a low wall, low landscaping, or some means to separat= them from other areas of the project. It was his opinion that this should become a condition of approval. Mr. Chiniaeff replied thaC he had no objection to using landscaping to separate the areas; however felt that the use cf fencing would destroy the open space areas of t .e project. Commissioner Rempel stated that the Condition in the Resolution requiring, the removal of Eucalyptus trees and the replacement of them with Eucalyptus of another species be reworded fbat they be replaced with a. fast growing, clean tree, as another type as Lucalyptus cculd be a very messy tree. Commissioner Rempel further stated that the reason for the Landscape Maintenance District requirement was that the City could not control what might happen to the project and its Homeowners' Association in the future. by requiring the project to be a part of the Landscape Maintenance District, we could be sure that the property would always be properly maintained. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to adopt the Resolution conditionally approving Tentative Tract 11853 with the changes as recommended. E. ENVIRONISNTAL ASSE03MENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-15 - BECK The development of a self-serve car wash and gas station in the Industrial Park category on 1 acre of land located on the northeast corner of Raven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard. APN 209-142-32. Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Chairman King asked the Commissioners if there were any questions. There were none and Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Larry Beck addressed the Commission stating that he accepted the conditions of approval and that he would answer any questions the Commission had. }, There were no further public comments and the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to adopt the Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 81-15. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANKA, DAHL, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY .- Planning Commission Minutes -4- October 28, 1981 Y AYES: COMMISSIONERS: RE34PEL, SCERANKA, DAHL, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY Motion: Moved by Dahl, seconded by Rempel, carried, to approve the I.inutes of September 23, 1981. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAUL, REMPEL, SCERANKA, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY CONSENT CALENDAR Motion: Moved by Rempel, secondei by Sceranka, carried, to adopt the Consent Calenear on the following items: A. TIME EXTENSION REQUESTS FOR THE FOLL014INC TRACTS: Tentative Tract 9659 - Carnelian Investments Tentative Tract 11459 - Prime Builders Tentative Tract 11563 - Red Hill Partners Tentative Tract 11.013 - Brubaker Tentative Tract 9619 - Hillside Vista Tentative Tract 11564 - Landmark B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81-32 - B.W.L.C.The development of a 31,940 square foot industrial building on 2.14 acres of land in the General Industrial ca::egory, located on the east side of Etiwanda, south of Arrow. ?.PN 229-141-13. C- DESIGN REVIEW FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11549 - LEWIS - A total resi- dential development for .design review approval of 27 single family dwelling units on 17 acres of land in the R-1 zone, located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue between Summit Avenue and Highland Avenue. APN 225-181-56. PUBLIC HEARINGS D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-01 (TT 11853) - AMERICAN NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION - A total planned development of 72 condominium units on 5.71 acres of land in the R-1-8,500 zone located on the north side of 19th Street and Ramona Avenue. APN 209-1.71-42. Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Planning Commission Minutes -2- October 28, 1981 sr:.. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11932 - E.J.L. - A custom lot subdivision of 2.7 acres of land into 10 lots in the R-1 zone located on the north side of Finch Avenue, west of Haven. APN 202-191-15. Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner., reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Rougeau to explain what will be done on the Haven Avenue Storm Drain. Mr. Rougeau replied that at the upper right-band corner of the property there is an asphalt crossing over the channel with culverts running under it. Be stated that the cressing, which was formally just an access into the property, would not be needed once the property was developed. The Condition was placed on the project so that it could be cleaned up at the time of development as it caused a constriction in the channel. Chairman King opened the public bearing. Mr. Wayne Jolly, Anacal Engineering, addressed the Commission for the applicant stating that he had no questions and needed no clarification of Conditions of Approval. Commissioner Dahl asked Mr. Jolly how he felt about his project being in the proposed Freeway right-of-way. Mr. Jolly replied that because of the residential zoning, he felt com- fortable that this was a good use for this property. There were no further public comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Dahl stated that utilizing R-1 zoning in freeway corridors was not, in his opinion, the best land use planning. Commissioner Rempel stated that he agreed with Commission Dahl, however, the fa•:t that there was R-1 zoning below this piece of property should preclude what would be placed on this site. He further stated that the residents of the adjacent property would be upset if high density was placed on the property. Commissioner Dahl stated that something other than a high density project could have been placed there, possibly a duplex-type housing. lie further stated that he thought that the policy of placing R-1 zoning in freeway corridors should be looked into. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Rougeau if the freeway would be going over or under haven. Planning Commission Minutes -5- October 28, 1981 �ti S Mr. Rougeau stated that it was hoped that it would go under Haven thereby eliminating many of these problems, however it was not known at this time what was proposed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Dahl, carried, to adopt the Reso- lution conditionally approving Tentative Tract 11932. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: RLWEL, DAHL, SCERANKA, KING, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY 8: 10 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed. 8:20 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7000 - DEBOSE - A residential subdivision of .54 acres of land into 2 lots in the R-1 zone located on the south side of 19th Street, east of Jasper Avenue. APN 202-024-15. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Dahl asked Mr. Rougeau if Engineering had taken a look at the drainage problem in the cul-de-aac of the project. Mr. Rougeau stated that the cul-de-sac lot,which was odd sbapee lead been squared off and the drainage would runoff onto Jasper, thereby eliminating potential problems. Chairman King opened the public hearing. The applicant was not present and there were no public comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Mr. Vairin advised the Commission that one of the Conditions, M-6, was not checked on the Standard Conditions form and it should be added. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried to adopt the Resolution conditionally approving Parcel Map 7000 with the above addition to conditions. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, SCERANKA, DAHL, KING NOES: COMMISSIONNRS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: TOLSTOY Planning Commission Minutes -6- October 28, 1981 w . F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11932 - E_J.L. - A custom lot subdivision of 2.7 acres of land into 10 lots in the R-1 zone located on the north side of Finch Avenue, west of Haven. APN 202-191-15. Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Sceranka askeO Mr. Rougeau to explain what will be done on the Haven Avenue Storm gain. Mr. Rougeau replied that at the upper right-hand corner, of the property there is an asphalt crossing over the channel with culverts running under it. He stated that the crossing, which. was formally just an access into the property, would not be needed once the property was developed. The Condition was placed on the project so that it could be cleaned up at the time of development as it caused a constriction in the channel. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Wayne Jolly, Anacal Engineering, addressed the Commission For the applicant stating that he had no questions and needed no clarification of Conditions of Approval. Commissioner Dahl asked Mr. Jolly how he felt about his project being in the proposed Freeway right-of-way. Mr. Jolly replied that because of the residential zoning;, he felt com- fortable that this was a good use for this property. There were no further public comments and the pudic hearing was closed. Commissioner Dahl stated that utilizing R-1 zoning in freeway corridors was not, in his opinion, the best land use planning. Commissioner Rempel stated that he agreed with Commission Daal, however, the fact that there was R-1 zoning below this piece of property should preclude what would be placed on this site. He further stated that the residents of the adjacent property would be upset if high density was placed on the property. Commissioner Dahl stated that something other than a high density project t; could have been placed there, possibly a duplex-type housing. He further stated that he thought that the policy of placing R-1 zoning in freeway corridors should be looked into. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Rougeau if the freeway would be going over or under Haven. Planning Commission Minutes -5- October 28, 1981 t7 1` . Y DIRECTOR'S REPORT H. REQUEST FOR DIRECTION ON THE POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT' OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AND HIGHLAND. Mr_ Lam addressed the Commission stating that Northkirk Presbyterian Church had requested guidance on the development of a Church site at the above location. It was suggested that in order to save time and money for the applicant that the project be brought before the Commission for comments before being formally submitted. Commissioner Rempel asked Staff the dimensions of the site. Mr. Vairin replied that it was approximately 699' x 560' east to west. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Mr. Larry Bliss, 7333 Hellman !.cenue, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the Commission in behalf of the applicant. Mr. Bliss explained the appli- cant's feelings on the various alternatives submitted by Staff. The Commission discussed the various alternatives with the applicant, expressing their concerns with the traffic and circulation problems associated with this site. The Commission's consensus was that they have many concerns regarding ' traffic land use compatibility, and circulation, but would be open to considering a church on the south side of the subject property, if all these issues can be adequately addressed. ADJOUPNMENT Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to adjourn. 8:50 p.m. The Planning Commission Adjourned. Respectfully submitted, f JACK LAM, Secretary i i'. Planning Commission Minutes -7- October 28, 1981 J'r.' CLARK & TREVITHICH A PIIOPCSKIOKAL CORPOKAT ft LAWYr-fQ$ DONALD T.CLARK 000 W ILSM/RC SOULEVARD,SUITE 700 WCOLMY 0.LA FEVER RONALD L.TREVITKICK IN,ObVIIOEt JAMSS C.MCCORMICK 7D A'!L ANOMM8,CAUFORNIA 00017 DOUGLAS C.MOR"IRON (EIS)aae-s7o0 ALEXANDER C."SOLLVRAT,JR. PMILIP W.9ARTCNCTTI DOLORCS CORDELL Novealber 190 1981 IN REPLY iLC4sC RGPE"To: STF.P:ICN ".TURNER I4150-003 Mr. Jack Lam Secretary of the Planning Commission P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA P173C Re- Proposed Amendment to Industrial. Specific Plan re rail spur and landscaped setback along the extension of Seventh Street Dear Mx'. Lam: We believe you are aware that Inland Container Corporation ("Inland") has an option to acquire Lot 1 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 7088. This firm is representing Inland in connection with the option and the possible acquisition of Lot 1 and has been authorized to deliver this letter to you. Please be advised that Inland is aware of the recommendation made by the Executive Committee of the industrial League of Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce at its meeting held on Gctc!ier 29, 1981 with respect to the amendment to the industrial Specific Plan to accommodate a rail spur parallel to the proposed extension of Seventh Street in Subarea 15 of the Industrial Zone C of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The recommendation was that there would be 20 feet of landscaping between the rail spur and the Seventh Street curb (five feet within the Seventh Street right-of-way, 15 feet between the right-of-way and the rail) . Inland has previously expressed its views to members of the City's Planning staff and of the Executive Committee of the Industrial League to the effect that it would prefer no landscaped setback. However, in view cf the apparent firmness of position taken by the Executive Committee and its commitment to the existence of a landscaped setback in a heavy-4ndustrial area, Inland will have no �rp 1� 4 Mr. Jack Lam November 19, 1981 Page Two objectio a landscaped setba w' P han that recom- e e b the Execu Please note that Inland ie concerned about the type and extent of landscaping to be required by the City within the setoack area and the expense to install and maintain any significant amount of landscaping. Very truly yours, JAMES E. MCCORrlICK III JEM:mm cc_ Dr. John M. Vaughan Roger Ericson, Esq. Mr. Theodore Zwicker Mr. Joseph N. Diiorio CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (_AA4- �c STAFF REPORT a � O O r_ F � z 1977 DATE: November 25, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-17 - SHIBATA - The temporary placement of a 480 square foot trailer on 1.29 acres of land in the C-1 zone to be located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Lemon Avenue. ABSTRACT: The Applicant, Green Rock Gardens, Incorporated, are requesting approval for the use of a trailer as an interim office during the con- struction of the permanent office facility. The Zoning Ordinance re- quires that a Conditional Use Permit be issued for such use for an interim period of time and is therefore being presented to the Com- mission for their consideration. ANALYSIS: Please find attached a letter from Robert Shibata of Green Rock Gardens, who is requesting use of a trailer for an interim office facility during the construction of his final office building. The nursery is part of the Chaffey Plaza development that the Commission approved sometime ago, located on the southwest corner of Lemon and Haven A%renues (Exhibit "A"). Building Permits have already been issued for this project and it is presently under construction; however, it is not anticipated that the office building will be completed for approximately another six months and the Applicant's lease on his present property will expire at the end of the year. The Applicant is proposing to have installed the front parking area, street imprive- ments, block walls along the perimeter boundaries , and landscaping installed prior to the installation of the trailer and commencement of the business. The Applicant proposes to store the plants in the designated plant storage area as shown on the attached Site Plan. Sta-:f recommends that no plant storage, storage of fertilzer bags, or other garden materials be outside of the plant storage area. Land- Al equipment, tools, and displays should be maintained totally within ITEM A Conditional Use Permit No. 81-17 Planning Commission Agenda ML November 25, 1981 Page 2 the plant storage area until the completion of the total nursery facility. In addition, any signs needed for the interim use of the property as a business will require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation. Circulation and parking is anticipated to be adequate as the Applicant is proposing full installation of the front parking area and street improve- ments in accordance with the approved Site Plan. Please find attached a copy of the proposed Resolution and recommended Con- ditions of Approval for this Conditional Use Permit. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all public input regarding the request for use of a trailer as an interim off4ce. After conclusion of the hearing, if the Commission concurs with the Staff recommendation, then it would be appropriate to adopt the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, ^5 a P JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:MV:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Letter from Applicant Resolution with Conditions of Approval i�S' f I g� [z ni W� lf ni rz 4 3} L c , � m Iz r DI f 1 r N111 w I Q, �YJ_O�}{� � '-�• �I C s. 4 S — Y (q t8 1Y ,4 c 4�1 CO 1-5 jig I� i.- HAVEN AVE $'S CHAFFEY PLAZA pcn pp qE�w} a C s : olwnirwa wove♦.raa.res r Green Rock Gardens, Inc. P.O. Box 518 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 Ask November 6, 1981 Mr. Michael Viarin Ci`y of Rancho Cucamonga P.U. Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif 91730 Re: Conditional Use Permit 10407 Iimm. n Ave. , Rancho Cucam. qa, Calif 91701 Dear Mr. Viarin: Enclosed is a package of items requested by the City of Rancho Cucamonga ? to obtain a permit for a temporary nodular unit at 10407 Lemon Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California (Chaffey Plaza) . We request that we be permitted to place this unit on the site for six (6) months. We enclosed all the necessary inf-rmation on the unit. It has been State approved. Also, we would like to let you kmcw that all the improvements will be completed, such as paving. plant storage, landscaping an.i parking. We respectfully request your approval for this unit and `-.hank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Robert .Shibata RS/vr " cc: Doug Hone S ' enc: Application for Conditional Use Permit ;.ti . Check for $464.00 10 Site Plans 1 Traimparency Infornmation of Modular Unit Labels n :4 AML RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-17 FOR AN K!TERIM OFFICE TRAILER GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AND LEMON AVENUES IN THE C-1 ZONE. WHEREAS, on the bth day of November, 1981, a complete application was filed by Green Rock Gardens, Inc. for review of the above-described project; and WHEF':AS, on the 25th day of November, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission helu a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: tECTION '_• That the following finding's can be net: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and, 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2 That Conditional Use Permit No. 81-17 is approved subject to 'the following conditions: 1. inat the miler be removed within 9 months from the date of its installation or at the completion of the permanent building, w�ichever is sooner. 2. That improvements such as installation of parking area, street improvements, walls and landscape buffers be com- pleted in accordance with approved plans prior to com- mencement of business. 3. All plant storage, materials and equipment, shall be kept within the plant storage area. rt . t Resolution No. Page 2 l,. 4. No signs, shall be placed on the property without written approval of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division,. 5. This approval shall not waive compliance with other applicable City Codes and Ordinances. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981. ,i PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i. 1. BY: Jeffrey King, 0airman 11. c ATTEST: Secretary of t e Planning ommission 'G r, I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1981, by the following ;i . vote-to-wit: 5` AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ?; NOES: COMMIS�TONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: %r. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CUCAM STAFF REPORT 9 CC � 0 F z U Y 1977 DATE: November 25, 1981 TO: Members of the (Tanning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development by: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 81-1 - ROTHSCHILD - The development of a 3,000 square foot commercial building and self service gasoline station on .70 acres of land in the C-2 zone located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue - APN 208-241-20. ABSTRACT: The Applicants have requested approval for the development of a free standing self service gas canopy use and a retail outlet building to be located on the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the plan with the Applicants on several occasions, as well as the Planning and Engineering staffs, and the Applicant has not com- plied with either the recommendations of the Design Review Committee nor the adopted Planning Commission policies regarding access on major and secondary streets. Therefore, it was the desire of the Applicant to have his case presented to the Planning Commission for a determination of these issues. Therefore, Staff has prepared a detailed report analyzing the 4ssues involved and is recommending denial of the project as the proposal does not meet the established Planning LoiTnissior policy nor does it reflect the design quality and expectations for this location.. BACKGROUND: The Applicants, Powerine Oil, are requesting approval to develop a self service gasoline sta, 'on and approval of a second- ary u,e on the site for a retail outlet. The site is just over one half acre in _ize and is located on the southeast corner of Vineyard Avenue ?nd Foo`hill Boulevard (Exhibit "A"). The site is presently vacant and is bordered on the east by an existing liquor store. To the south is vacant land which is planned `or residential development and tc the north and west are commercial uses. The site is presently zoned C-2, which is a service/commercial zone, and is General Planned for commercial usage. n }'., '. ITEM B CUP 81-13 Planning Commission Agenda November 25, 1981 Page 2 ANALYSIS: The Applicants have met with the Design Review Comrittee on two occasions to develop the plan in accordance with the Design Review Committee's recommendations and with existing development policies. The Applicant has not been able to develop a site plan in accordance withihe direction of the Design Review Committee nor in accordance with established access policy for this site. There are three main areas which have not been resolved and are the resultant factor in the Staff's and Design Review Committee's recommen- dation of denial . The following is a discussion of each of the three areas and the related problems. 1. Access: Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission Reso- ution No. 78-29 which establishes access policies for major and second- ary thoroughfares. The Planning Commission established this policy as it recognized the need for maintaining efficiency and traffic safety on major and secondary thoroughfares. This policy was also adopted as part of the Circulation Element of the General Plan. The proposal by the Applicants is not consistent with the access policy because the driveway on Foothill Boulevard is proposed to be located less than 100' from the curb returns of the intersection on Vineyard and Foothill. On a major thoroughfare such as Foothill Boulevard, the minimum 100' distance to driveways was established to allow for safe traffic circulation through the intersection prior to having to neno- tiate turns or decelerating. The Applicants have contended that moving the driveway to 100' would cause site plan problems with the style of development they are proposing. It is physically possible to locate the driveway 100' from the curb return which would put it closer to the east property line. This also would create a better possibility for the ultimate combination of driveways to this faci- lity with the adjacent liquor store in the future. Staff has tried d, extensively to encourage the use of a combined driveway or fhe east property line; however, the developer has not had any cook ;ion S from the adjacent land owner. r 2. Design: The Design Review Committee is of the opinion that the proposed retail building should be used as a screen to the gas pump canopy. The Design Review Committee feels that the site �. could be improved in its design quality by locating the retail building at the corner and the gasoline canopy behind the build- ing to screen the automot-*ve related uses. The Design Review Committee's intent is foctsed on the importance of t` i inter- section as one of the prime intersections of -he City. The Design Review Committee's comments are also based on the poi-,cy t . of the Planning Commission to screen automobile related uses with buildings where possible. The Design Review Committee's suggestions for the rearrangement of the buildings would also work well in regards to the access problem with the present design. CUP 81-13 Planning Commission Agenda November 25, 1981 Page 3 Additionally, the redesign would help eliminate some internal cir- culation problems. The Applicant claims that a design of this nature does not work given the type of development which is desired. Staff has looked at the arrangement of the buildings and has done some sketch work to see the feasibility of this arrangement. It is pos- sible to accommodate the Design Review Committee's suggestions with modifications in the retail building size and creating a one-way traffic flow through the gasoline pump line. 3. Internal Circulation: It is the contention of the Engineering and Planning staffs that the combined uses on this property will cause internal circulation and cross traffic pattern problems. Individuals will be entering the site via Foothill Boulevard or Vineyard Avenue and will be entering the pump islands From either the north or south sides plus parking in parting stalls to use the proposed retail outlet. With the car stacking that can occur with service stations and the usage of the retail building, there will be situations where indi- viduals will not be able to circulate through the site in a safe and efficient manner. Again, a different design of the site or elimination of one of the two uses would improve the situation. With two uses of this nature located on this size of a lot, it becomes difficu'it to separate the traffic and parking needs for each use. Additionally, the site is further hindered by the fact that the original property owner has acquired a 20' access easement along the south boundary which eliminates an additional 20' of land on the property. The site is not adequate in size and shape to safely accommodate the size of the proposed uses. It is the Design Review Committee's recommendation that the Planning Commission deny the request for this development based upon the above discussion and is- sues. The Design Review Committee has given the Applicant every opportunity to redesign the project. The Planning and Engineering Division staffs feel that any deviation from the access policy at this intersection would not be in the best interest of the City or the circul *ion of this area and could cause significant traffic impacts. The Commission has three basic options available; (1 ) deny the project based on the findings as proposed within the attached Resolutfon; or, (2) provide direction to the Applicant regarding the Commission's opinion or these issues and continue the project, with the consent of the Applicant, to allow redesign of the site; or, (3) direct Staff to pre- pare Conditions of Approval for the project based upon the proposed configur- ation. ;1 . CUP 81-13 Planning Commission Agenda November 25, 1981 ANIL Page 4 Please find attached a Resolution of Denial with Findings. Should the Com- missiori f;nd the project acceptable in its present form, then direction should be provided to Staff to prepare the final Conditions of Approval. This would require continuance to the following Planning Commission meeting to allow the Staff to prepare the necessary Conditions of Approval. RECOMMENDATION:. It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider the issues which have been presented within the Staff Report and deny the request based upon the findings listed in the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:MV:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Gas Canopy Exhibit "C" - Retail Building Resolution 78-29 Resolution of Denial --gift r i� i 1 I•.. , 11 ��, t. � I I I 1 I /��lf �Y I •�� ' t was l t 1 t r 1/ RESOLUTION NO. 78-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF' THE CITY 7/ OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING ACCESS POLICY FOR MAJOR AND SECONDARY THOROUCHFAPES UUFREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuca- monla recognizes that to maintain capacity, efficiency and the safety of traffic flow on major and secondary thoroughfares, it is necessary to limit and control access; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish firm policy guidelines to allow property owners fronting or. said streets to properly plan the use of their land. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ESTABLISHED that for develop- ment of properties fronting on all major and secondary thoroughfares t"he following criteria shall be observed in relation to access control: 1 . Non access to all major and secondary thoroughfares shall be dedicated to the City wherever suitable alternative access may be developed from local or collector streets. . , 2. Where access must be granted to a major or secondary thorough- fares said access shall be limited to one point for 300 feet of frontage or one point per parcel with less than 300 feet of front :ge. It is the intent of the policy to establish a minimum 300 feet spacing between driveways. 3. Combined access to major and secondary thoroughfares between adjacent properties shall be encouraged wherever nossible to reduce the number of encroaclmients. 4. Access points shall wherever poseible be located a minimum of one hundred (100) feet from the end of curb returns at intersections on 4 lane or wider highways. 5. Where otherwise compatible with this policy access shall be located opposite existing or planned access poi:.ts on the opposite side of the street. Variations from these policies will. require approval of the Community 0avelopment Director of the City of Ranchu Cucamonga subject to appeals to the Planning Commission. c' r, APPROVED AND ADOPTER 'i'::IS E'i':: DAY Or NOVDIBER, 1978. P G C-�__1ISSION OF THE CITY Jr' RANC1,0 CUCAMONGA Herman Rempel, Chairman ATTE . Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM Secretary of the Planning Commission of the r City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was " duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of November 1978, by the following vote to-wit: AYES: CoMMISSU1NERo: TOLSTOY, GARCIA, DAML, JONES, RE24PEL i NOES: CMDUSSIONERS: NONE G ABSENT: COMISS10NERS: NONE d i' :j e . RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 81-1? FOR A SELF-SERVE GAS STATION AND RETAIL OUTLZI LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VINE- YARD AVENUE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE C-2 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 7th day of August, 1981, a complete application was filed by Peter B. Rothschild for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of No$-ember, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission rrsolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the above-described project is denied based on the following findings: 1. The proposed development is not in accordance with the objectives of the Circulation Element of the General Plan; and 2. The proposed development will be detrimental to the i public health, safety, and welfare; and 3. The site is not adequate in size or shape to safely and efficiently accommodate the proposed uses and development; and 4. The proposed access is not in conformance with adopted access policies; and 5. The proposed development does not meet the goals and ,4 policies of the Community Design Element of the General Plan. s APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman 1Sc ?' . d.; Resolution No. Page 2 ® ATTEST: Secretary of the P tinning Commission I , JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by t;ie Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1981 , by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0V41 ' � t r LLD e ��r o'� - C1'1'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �cniya STAFF REPORT 1n0a n o a Fo > 1977 DATE: November 25, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Arlene Troup, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 81-14 - TENTATIVE TP,ACT 12040 - PFEILER - A change of zone from R-1 to R-3/PO for the development of 328 condominium units on 23.6 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Turner Avenue and Arrow Route - APN 208-34-9 and 11 . ABSTRACT: The Applicants have submitted development plans and a Tract Map for Z.he above-described project in order to gain consideration for approval by the Planning Commission,. The approval of this project will necessitate the approval of four integral parts of the project: A Negative Declaration for the Environmental Assessment; the rezoning of the site from R-1 (Single Family Residential ) zone to R-3/PD (Multiple Family Residential/Planned Development) zone; the Site Plan and building design; and the TenLative Tract Map. The project has been reviewed by both the Design and Growth Management Review Com- mittees and has successfully passed the Residential Assessment System. Staff has prepared this detailed Staff Report, related Resolutions, and Conditions of Approval for your consideration. BACKGR06ND: The Applicants, Pfeiler and Associates Engineers, Incor- porated, are requesting approval of their proposal in order to develop 328 condominium units on 23.6 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Turner Avenue and Arrow Route (Exhibit "R"). The site is presently undeveloped and is void of vegetation (Exhibit "B"). A portion of the Deer Creek Drainage Channel forms the eastern boundary of this project site. The surrounding property uses are mired. The property east of the channel is zoned for industrial use. To the north there is a single family residential subdivision, and an undeveloped parcel of single family residential land. On the west side of Turner there is a large apartment complex. An application has been filed for a large multiple family development on the property south of Arrow. There is a neighborhood market on the southwest corner of Arrow and Turner, and thr parcel on the northwest corner is zoned for com- mercial use, but is currently vacant. ITEM C b Afflk Planned Development 81-14 Planning Commission Agenda November 25, 1981 Page 2 ANALYSIS: The project is being developed in accordance with the State' s Sub ivision Map Act as well as the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. The proposed change of zone is consistent with the General Plan, which designates this area for Medium Density Residential use (4-14 dwelling units per acre). The density for this project is 14 dwelling units per acre. As can be seen from the Site Plan (Exhibit "�"), setbacks, building separa- tion, height., parking, and open space requirements of the Zoning Ordinance have been complied with. The proposed structures are a combination of attached townhouses and one level apartments arranged in clusters of 7 units. Each unit has access to a two car garage. Additional guest parking spaces are provided throughout the development. Pedestrian footpaths are provided in order to form a ;:ontinuous interior circulation system. Recreation faci- lities including a swimming pool , tennis courts, and a tot lot have been pro- vided towards the center of the development. Access to the development is provided via driveway locations on Turner and Arrow. Full street improvements will be required. The interior road system is a curvilinear system which meetz the design standards of the Zo.- ing Ordi- nance and which will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. A Conceptual Grading Plan (Exhibit "D") has been reviewed by the Grading Com- mittee and has been given conceptual approval , subject to further review of the grade separation along the north property line. The majority of the drain- age of this site will be directed in a south and east direction into the Deer Creek Channel . Landscaping is being provided throughout the development in accordance with the standards and policies set by the Planning Commission (Exhibit "E") . As a multiple family development, the project will be required to provide 50 trees per acre. Arrow Route is to be heavily landscaped and is to include mo�mding and a meandering sidewalk. A detailed Landscaping and Irrigation Plan indicating all proposed planting material shall be submitted for approval prior to the issuance of Building PErmits. The Design Review Committee reviewed the project finding it acceptable as a style for this area (Exhibits "G" through "J" ). Detailed colored renderings, Site Plans, and a building materials board will be available for your review and ccnsideration at the Planning Commission meeting, along with a model of a typical cluster of units. Because of the style of architecture, any roof 4L Flanned Development 81-14 Planning Commission Agenda November 25, 1581 Page 3 mounted equipment could become visible. It is recommended that :f roof moon ted equipment is to be used, that a detailed plan showing how they can be architectv;allyintegrated be reviewed and approve'. by the Design Review Committer prior to issuance of Building Permits. Please find attached Part I of the Initial Study, completed by the Applicent, which discusses various environmental factors relative to the project. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study,. No adverse impacts on the environ- ment due to this development have been founa. If the Commission concurs with this determination, recommendation to the City Council for an issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised in a local newspaper of general circulation as a public hearing item, and notices have been mailed to surround- ing property owners within 300' . The developers held a meeting at the Neigh- borhood Community Center to introduce the project to property owners in the area. Staff attended the meeting as an observer. Many aspects of the develop- ment were discussed at length, and the overall general consensus seemed to be one of support for the project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider all matters reictive to this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings of Staff, adoption of she attached Resolution with Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development l' JL:AT:j' Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Tentative Tract Map & Vicinity Map Exhibit "R" - Natural Features & Site Utilization Map Exhibii "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Landscaping Plan Exhibit "F" - Phasing Plan Exhibits "G" through "J" - Architectural Design P evations Exhibits "K" through "P" - Parspecitives and Line of Sight Drawings Initial Study, Part I Resolutions with Conditions of Approval aS MI. mv Nil' i',f I�te� 7^ylti.{v'F^4��7. ;_Y,�l '�' , •,�f f..�.e+rr VW Al JV "Ir Yla W I -Ir -PA. MRO"l-EX.- NORTH CITY or W, ANQ "", CUAMONTYGA TITLE: Ma PLANNING DIVISION -fiBrr- Em A SCALE- E _ _ A LOIN } t �SIDENTIA MEDIUM 1 -- oFrlsE NIERCLAL riW � 1 `.1 a .mow M1\�•� �, ' s — �f{/E 2 r4 w s-a— � es'�s>•b Bol / — o;; C p® a c = E- CDM ERCIIAL '—R£ MEmCIY ~O R-1 o iD ..� a...a ..... o O= > N � RESIDE L a�Ds. r u NORM CITY OF RANCHO C.IUC'�Ali IONGA TITLE: .;', PLANNING Div LI;ICkN Exlil}3ti:�_r�CALE:�ueedl� :E 77— 7.914A= ROL 10=61uc mav*v PIP. P49MMMEM C= ju 4 1,�\4�,`�" ��.. �\\Y d FIr ORA -4 11 TIT, NORTH CITY OF ITF-\, ,[: Tye.Ile r- RAINCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE. iA e7�N rx� PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- C, SCALE: AOL ry--=-- 1 JaMV ®P uummaim ® ma.,a► v ) � 1y � ti �.�. :�--•,,yam:_;�y-�� ....... .., g4 ♦ y N 1 Y' � .�� � 1 t ^�f 7 ? y a ..,,•� ., � .. . •'Y�.�f•...Cno:tr.. h _ t � 01 1.6: i 'IIL' • 9 u I`'ORTH CITY OF ITEM: Wetlei- qp MACHO CUCA1V ONGA TITLE: "Pla n PLtANNINC 1DAWON EXHIBIT-�SCA.LE- k.( II �.6('!••I i � 4 r L L red 1'JrtL'�J' � �� • i �9� a;• 1 t fig+ Y 'art" �f•' •V�yTC 1 NORTH CITY OF ITEM, _ - RANCHO CUCAiV ONGA TITLE: Tb -�- PLANNI NU DIVISION EXHIBM I� GALE: Q 0� 1 fa+q. n.�"f "47i�P' ,..5.. ,.t •l t ..:rY �[�,` ,!(� 1.} `•Y Y .t w;� .J•-.... 1�'4t(f+ 1 n � a ,.v.l � r`7"1\ 'r51y�4 N iit"'ti',f4�.Siuin,b�s�t' 1�T ', n�, a� f.\'j�''T'�C��j�'.l .+I fr f'lljywt',•t•.' /� .r y it a•)� { � 1 ,till �r�y+b �! cl .•1�'11''v SgY r6 +c ��[11�.c�a,•y. �/���:y 1. .0 �y 1'�•''Tr`� { J,t{ JJ11 : 1"'I.JIi•.` 11A. ( rr�.fl f.y , ♦}r��?4l J ��1��./V.JM Y ���IILJ:IV'.� � 0. J�l. � � •rerr.w„pbn»nma f} �'r�Q•1IOAl-!]uu`�C+�' S�UaI�IG`�; AML ,Y�}��II �-'� ^ ��''r�'.i.(�I.ON'll�ll'�]4'DCJD`J� •+(®L0.1U'CG$�frZk^�c 7, 1.��� { G, 1F'1♦ld. � �. �•i�nn` .t.fy�,',�� rr r�r.l YT L LS, 5 y "j. ,, I n yi�c 9 '•'T F 1 "t„1 v1Y1y.1lt pOW.!9Rmom Y .� f . . ,. ty r eq„ �TVF EPPy?RR704V0QiClt9yOW�7AttAtOMSOfIh'( �.� r k! _ .4• ..� J�!t t a,Y N'-"_,y��f 4f�'4 r.�FJ+vP�' 4�'4�'.V{.�vy,ge.""'.Z'ys•' a f ' , '+ ''^b t71y i F. I +.f .., ti 1 r1 .t'.P,<_}+ Yrti�4'I�. JrytJt LI/.1 .Mtr,-+'✓'.,��,.�w,' , I E. '.. F m��• '1 � �i� t'r�lr. •h'x{. J� Ir.�T is � tlri �f J '. C wma I J � � 44'r � 1/"OV ■ 3O1 + 1 �.. � r? i'• c t }},, nay l .� •.:• t.��,�1,( � , .J. 3. •I , rr :1 ;M�..h� s� .' I f^^JJ �h� I­x'' rq�q���Itil t ,n i ( ✓ V n; IL. NORTH CITY Or ITEM: _ Ii Al�'CI iC� �.�L!'C1VIOi�rYCF� TITLE ' ` I PLANNING DIVLSIOI'v EXHIBIT:�_SCALE. t I , ,L 1 ? CLy �i0.A11✓LI I '.,1 tT »CL wAIt"-7 Ltfl'�%r/! 11'f:l� IAl Yr/ 1, + , }r+'� v: L +I' ,v.++F'ts F".� . t --f. .r > ,C' }Y i:-tJ Ils{ •"+{�r•r '��'�n tc1 CSa91E.Qb7P96 s. 7 t v'r: i�� {�� L�f •' NM al + 1l I .(r)r.��tr.9� '1 K" � I,tr"`�I /t � R .�CQiQd®� � .1i 'l , 1 tii - ,� rl :I �� • r,+Ys.r1' /it•IYtrl1+ �.{HY I hk 'ij1 W �rJ'}L+YL hir Yl'f'•. r vy' h (7iCv) F i...' Lr Y ••II'K X ryr�I .L){rfY 9 �..{i:( ��WaS,t 14iA'j„f�4 i�+.'L'.]ur 'J n eL1l✓'�Y� f•N�(r ... 1. '1 .t.•1 L t t . , 14i t•a)1 3 , Y�trYz v �s�v(VVG ^��✓" � �:'S ,.,Z j 1 TORAt�01-MG. ' O40 nr's'1a,rY. r 1 41•( +tr7...�Y(Y rc; ,`gy' JYa •4A��+f' 1 {Jf.)ti!'f��11• ( TV4G4 •kla''t2�{6 t i" 1-4 I Jar �I, In�+p n iaJ pY•'1 -r ftNrlrr Y�[x trLtf �.Y..`{I"fl if +�iJ'{' tt ,.C1440o<' I 'L , °rl p 1 j,r�nr y��}��itJ 4� nA! t .N T/ yb1 t!'tj•�' l �'9'In Zh II�aY 1I k aYrJ r v Y (/.�r'�+ t F � rYtvv` r , ' N 7s 7+1nao•r++k`. ✓ .?, v ^� { r!j' 71AY�0000 Otl CVCA0iA8A t b•y"vLM1,�{rtt 7P�� ,< � at S6 rrr? w-,w yrAa� /,•/3 }< ar+ ^� " '.1 } : r � ylYf6.! g'rbryr•��..T 1.1�1 ,rl M, ��� � 1n�1�'�, s ]...�' f 5 r. Ir1 �� J YwS �.V Rb � ��1�j.1 i�A• (.4Mf I• �{ T 1� 1 H1)�t �I�L.I M I t �f r . L T � 1r f I 4 r r t �•1, st�.t�f:4!", l��'L' h• 9 "T'1" y, R car+ l Y.1 i i *i T. t f ly '�{.a F ftYf� r N. .✓� { v { 1 r �`E' r .r I .� i`�4,f Y,` Y Y _JaR�� �nl.yh+,:�.f �;� 1rY4�...': d1 rs'j�Jrr ac L�J' .. (pLvt ( ;Y �•r 1 a.nj �: � <11.1 • .J. t71 I+1rr S r�•�>wl{woma am 1 wvmwY{ 1 �S.>� y'�3a'1.ai.,7hr� C n4.. .. +'•- + ( q 3 .�� 1 r / J /wOiw ti •,wm frmwY - a ' I J^ c • ..t y Ylslrnwv.r4 wvvwuawo t.t 7./`,'k )II L.• 7.1 rewrslco.vewwY• ✓r/'1 1.1' t * L.. •r } �71 l 1 Y 1 I✓ .111 I.1 r' IL1 j" r N.1,� - O Jt r" t -.~ f pp w f`{ t.y N.L S• C I 'Y' r,T L Y f t ^I •. t y.l I I t ' L✓ ! 4 f r � �/i 1 M1"�"/• 1.-. rY I _y ` j"1 f'lf�. .LNY� Y��Tt � ]`' 1 t1'y,�++.Yl 1 r Iry r��l 1 r f .� J' .wpl'�` 'I P 1 1 i:. 1P 1 li r7"a 1 1. 1 •i i 3 i L� ] ,/ L s y }.1 •.Yr .., �'l-"•. l�� t.{J1. o- �;I4..Y,..• L I' �-�{ y;,al Ali v- / .a .."+Y a '.•I '. .Y s.,, E ' la x 1 Yf n t aIv{• r ) rI 4I t 1 I lv T 1 'I tl t L• Y�.{I 9 $1 i I <f If l �� `f{f r>'"3 a /r (i t?r � ap .r Ihl , -1 tr 1 • . rJ - � ^l7 ✓Lh � t l ^I r- r its: 1 :,m " 3r .... - r r /'.* I .+ � v' f •� L` K+ 4 111: .4_• _L 1 .. tlG(I/ 4 ''r.= ✓ u ' 141E�Pt®06 vWOYN'6.0RW0�4W.iMm9QLmW001®000®N.m6.M.tO' {^� a ir' M' �f �c �r . iPuwl HIYtY<O• �.. .-T L 1 `� 1 �/ 4' t V f'K +�(h 3 1 ! a'Yf +,'✓ tl? .1 l``{I J n I„n„K!wR-f KJ l at�/ -K�F/tt I I t I YiY t .n Y t �..t. �r5 i�" 1"a l�iM i 1•/1' 1 „L f 11'f.•<Ir 1 .. r�Y�w LW�w...w�.T'^^w.!�Mw•.L A I ' ® . I. Y I I r j�^'ty Q•�.t,• I.L'A7��•••• Y `1t Yjtl V t •� . it j L a t 5 :}{NJ o 1 Y +ta va lr it s I+r* rau L.il Y�II�IP il.--f• S wl ! yl.l v�1_, /v ti S,S.tf+„c�s v L 7 .1'..i u rJl „ /r s, b '+ � Y nJ�Y h t`L 1 h�l a"' (t•M •GV 1 r � h„r� n1 ?r!\'i ) 1a P3!. C Y� l: rti �'{ 1.,>� ��1i .t+ 4.AT LI .I rii•IJ .�.M '�' Lv �'7)Y (r.. 1f'd�a�lfis�}�. � n I,�r jt Y+) t '.�7 •.l y !{•lll^�1<1ZK$r �Ir'✓Jt " l ru L - r v�" i L x YiY�y hr+ I L tq �.•<,f. I 1 J[.iay ;•Sa�t � '��ii �w� I1't"j .b Yy.(•�'.ir�rltiJ/}yf 7` fa ce.$t✓ .���y�1�,. i�wj 7YIT� .t M�5'P. L�i�Y��ll-r '., I Yr+l 2-`r' a0l f' Qr1 R{I�ttJi 'l K''LI� Yy114' fL�AII VY It sl.• Y.'IY r yh rr�r{r•a ixf�lr_ r7C(J/JSi .{HY lIV Jt]t A -Ili. +�Y S.�r1+I'f[r Xti _'rJlyt 4l a111ef rf'C{Y"+'Nl f*'�js�.{i�I'i�dKf}r•".If3`��Hi�Ja?2'A�lhh i.d�.r'f'll/vu�''t' ��Y�r tS"rr 117;'y�L�1�M��� �� C rr �J'sr• Nf 1`r ttrnl.'r' rJr+�++�1' , o--Ll wl 4 h✓ lint^o L k `w s.' bbY,� /y 7, y'�.4uY•;l A; � k . t f 11 : �f�.',Sr Y�-• L /dl'krL' Jl r P yb�ji• r/l �S7_"YI}LY .]rt(! .7'"\ �l l �tv1..ry F. ' I✓jJt.f" V'}, l4hr Jn !t S•.Ifin�.�'V7�"^f�YM r��l:t.�4t>�1�i1�-1!•1 n�iMt.r#�r�i �lJ '"Z"' Ta'S.L� i�a�'k�(��r 't� .a.l�l �Z� ,�r. Li4.a_'1.. .4e/ . 1.r1�.�.y.1.R .:,,.•Srr. L »']' r .tr il..%+i. -..yi :' .rt' /:.L.{..r/ .. t'J'�1... . 1 .la.:T �'.1 .\:J Y.J;, 4� V NORTH CITY Or, ITEM: P k\er RANCHO CUCAMO\GA TITLE PLANNINVY D1VLS►ON EXHIMT: R SCALE L ,'. � � ..•!r � ; I y I t I �,, z ' ' � � , ^I .� . • ; r. .. . �' c '� `;: , ,. ` ';i' ,.. 1 1 It I IV• 1 11; l �� 1 �• �i 1 � ! y � ° 1 `.��' �� I 1�; � it t �' 1i• f, i�� ,i 1 . ,. 1.. � I lli 1141 �� I � I n't�� '. �••�Ai• �.�'. M° 1 � 1 � F '"l�r•-': ! r W��f M{• // � j t2.Ta 1�'u� 1 J �' i.�Ttc:r.' �� .. ��' �� -�. ,t3 , • ;•, ;. Y ,'� 1 , �. •.! �• :•i�• ��+� !l' t n I• 'Y Y r A 11 r' t 1 fp ;I 1 .Y ♦ 1Y ` I .h I.• Y - r,l'`' • !r ,,�1' rl Y I I a' � r� r '%< �Jl'f .�r.. n ;r !L. :r I`; r i h r •, . r y rIl 1pII r ;.. r � Y •I • yu�nl�'� i,� Y t R r 1 , 1. I I '1� r r'' '•( •1 I• I I p A J� „Y r: i —+ I�• � T to Iff ,.p ) .fix.`� "�' •;.r �L• I 1 ' 1 r 1 L� N J ' i 1�. o1 ,i 40, • I :1 I n + �1 f. �1. 1. Mil•' . ,� AfYL �• � .�e.:lt I ,r1 Lb ii J i it �r. , I1 1 � „ h! � 1 1 WWI i;, �.° �'�� : �I�a k..' fps 1•'r. 1•N ..�I tlj J y , � I N I�4� 1� •� L .,.A tY '4� R it ••j i 11 I 1 I'I 11 ( L- � , 'y lb vir—���"=i� •�-�aci l.._ 'o s`.1=Dry �. Q .. �a C " 1 _-tom• © F^Y O cc _ V U La /1. J i /:�7 � w a `� •s' 1° r SF( . Y� y, 1 4 • y l y 1 1 i L • It Ib ,� 17 I (' ' •� h �' I �! 1 q,�rt M� M1 N� I4 # 1 � 1 i 1 >, y l T . r M, K ) �1. r ��•`` 1 1 A1�f} i . . N I 1 �'1 r r � I 1l 1 Ol 1 I �.' � , I.n. i' •I n iD 1 I � � • 1 � ,. t 1 r A f. ♦ ' �� l` � ♦ n 4 .F 4 , it '• I ,1 1 1 9i , � 1 1, AJSy': C ^ 1 I~ J 1aJllt �' I' r •1 Sl h i t�e� i .. Li 'µme 4 1 17:'1 F° I a-i L 1 •j. 1 i.I'. 71 f RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12040 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12040, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Pfeiler & Associated Engineers, Inc. , applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a 23.6 acre site located on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue into 7 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on November 25, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: ® SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to erntative Tract No. 12040 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or impravements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the .;ubdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. ( Resolution No. Page 2 (9) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION Tentative Tract Map No. 12040, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. A directory shall be placed near each entrance to the project showing the location of specific units. 2. The derailed landscape plans are to include adequate features for buffering between this project and the single family subdivision to the northg as well as, between this project and the Deer Creek Channel . 3. A detailed plan of any roof mounted equipment shall be submitted showing how it is to be integrated architecturally with the building. The plan is to be reviewed by the Design Review Committee prior to � �� �r'• 4• - tle is+s�uan 2 o�2f bldiRg ermi � (� ENGINEERING� bIV� •_sJI�C.�,' d� 1. The required on-site and off-;ite easements for the proposed storm drain system shall be dedicated to the City. The applicant shall make all necessary arrange- ments with San Bernardino County Flcod Control District to provide the connection to Deer Creek Channel . 2. The existing temporary construction easement along Deer Creek Channel shall not be occupied or obstructed until the easement is vacated by the Flood Control District. 3. A lien agreement or in-lieu cash deposit of the (12001 of the estimated construction cost) at the discretion of the City Engineer shall be provided for the future construction of the landscaped median island on Arrow Route (1/2 width). 4. Left turn ingress and egress to the project from Arrow Route shall be prohibited onca the median island on Arrow Route is constructed. The developer shall in- corporate a clause in the C.C. & R's notifying the prospective homeowners of this access restriction. Resolution No. Page 3 5. The portion of the existing P.C.0 pavement to the center line of Turner Avenue as determined by the City Engineer, shall be removed and replaced with asphalt concrete pavement. Minimun thickness of asphalt con- crete pavement on Turner Avenue shall be 6". APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981. PLANNING COPMIISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .ram. BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1981, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 1' ry, t 14�t ,tt 40 V Jb •"V C 4 'J Y... > T O O ^ U V L O J+_ O C C•�IG.p �. 'na .". G G L A �'O G q C R N r !J V 4 Y G i u. L N✓ _ _ �v yL�. ✓ c. y Q r:. .✓ u � 'G q M � V I L q u V � Q� ^ Lf� ('/O C � 9( � � Y L 4 C' L i.•9. O•N c}4•..L�1+1 v S V ` L• O L I L N �/V✓ q u a y �u y Lu `s �'y ni� ccoL xx N ` ."•' L O 00 rr 9 a" f V N✓ u�um V L n�0 L ^ R L ���......��. C' CN .;.•r 'U � l J Ob Yd F-�AC ✓ OC dOSINL^ ..N ✓ J1 9iw. ._ O Cc P� � N V� N� VOy ✓ 0...`� H«�y�r y qC J^ O n^ = 'O � V• V C.. -W✓N I Cu= d >. O n T '.Gn i °� � �I-a ` c Z v s r u w L 4 ✓ %a n N 3 O L -N •..l' 9 A'� aC L L = O 9 d J ^ 'n G$ Y q L77 l N O q'•,P G i v 0' 1 9 Y � G.V� ✓N A I6 G V L� d ' '-O' A W J W N G' Y `n^ '�✓A N Y L V U q J✓A ✓ ^O 6 N C. L G V M } N. � a• N u C G {i o v W W QC lL h N c � f`J $'_' L �� _ ✓Z 1c 7—.. "q Ks- V, L u Yo ✓ a N N .•..Nr m � u a b � L `• ii �. .o � u r— r w a T � �o °: n L > Lri:. m« c •- f,'ti y� W NY „ > „ L: TJ q ✓N✓ Y 6� w r N,LL ro.o. Lw i � � °a' «. �.� .o..� - � � � i.�,y Lo�sY• �✓ Y.. P \ a �^ yy ^ .Va aViY V` O4 �. 'r VOO J �✓ O YbD O TV+ Y9.{ V' NL OJ GNC ~` fy CaV �L w6 L N� V LLOFOCaV OUA N��Wj V. a'a V Wy0 L C V L pv�l � r -NL M V d6 P AY ✓ A IN {�Cj: q✓p„ '+p �` C.CC pp n�u y^ 1_ CJ41 H -r^� 1!�a• r ML • ^ (a"Va`� LO• `r „ L A G l C C N Y V Y O. C yq d^ •�C b N p 4 N $ q N V^O 6 N�. L> n.' n��ti o z gi a � ¢ � W c� q L c W _✓ ^'..nL y i Cam•. C_O p �..✓-y' "` p G JL L /W N 5i q LlgO4V wt '�„ ^ C q 1�N L40. L C.01 C q 'y L. �.�^' _ � Fir L 4 N W^ 3a >•VV•CL W N W C Y+W +• N� N✓ b �..G. L _C, pY ^O Y ^ i } y'✓ G N N C A C C(J A � C u C^C V O�'� d�a •GW Vry yW� L✓ CqT �' ` d d L y 9.�C1V R L•p d >,NV LqqN N 4tC GT`• _. d6 > � LY,�� L1 yr..... y/ bi'•, YyJ O✓ It �^�✓r••� 1-T Q N✓r .LIp G4m Y^A a �O GN t�"' LLL L' q LY6 a.P> ` L d„'� � _ .0 0�..�a- 3 rr 1- � Y•V 3� O 4 • N � afj ✓ LV L.L R VL b �d 4 >d � �I 1 Ii x! I XI n W N q L ^ O G M l • ✓Y d d ^ O � G Oi C)✓ U� UN O p uY y ^V O �+ L C O O T 4 (4! L L ^ ^ 4 C W N V u C q O O VVLC 6 •V_rt v O a9^qn O.�O W•^ TL •• .^> q OJO � O VO r U Y" 'n6L luN Ru any L ^� aY OL �i � � • C^.11�Gd L.�T FLt NO 91 Ou4G G! O� OL G F! LW q✓ qN1 q✓qq 6Ly ICY C¢•W O. - ' C.� V✓J^ V ANV W �J•^ V 4 u O q t'L y C ^ L M L U u an V O O l +✓ q N q + VL 6 NW yy AqV 2C q✓V -1-n ^^'V- O UCIN q� J.LLA �V� L6 f p0 O �L � b _✓ E q _� NUaO'a L` O A 'Ly L^'iv 'n Y. �b �y d •[f^ '�q uL WN W yN r 4 we �Q+ $ Tb 'u$$ NJ c✓ b,- ✓ i ui° � '> Am9 is �L �.>.✓" $ate v �•� w .`.^ `L'a W.` W�m�$rn �NL. o� q wr n�.+'c`.n""N L✓ � Y �` u✓Lrc�.N. -pV �pN��.gq� P>cC -'.uo �Fi q cgv'o cc Z:L.N ^ % >. �L • Q �� _9. r V�q M b 6 V�Y 4 9 m r tl V y yV LLry OV 9a LN COOL✓CCb.r^ MLa+ ••GA.✓ .I:' � C � � D �� yV4 O. mN W}O 'n ..OayyL +�• 4Y aC $d �.`� GO 'O TOE f. �Vi1 LV 4 BU Cd qG 6V L^ pdYL� NSA YW ¢O = P(,p C VL� q.'�✓ 6C IL q yC W q Oq N pI CNL • b1 Z WC,• L Vu VO A9 9 C J 2: N 6•� C A y L O �/q N 9 G n Y W q✓ L V 4 pr "VL Lq Vy T✓ $�V LNV PL Td '� pT1 q •• ^ L71+V =. jC (`C� GIC9 ON ^ L''OO o A N N O 014L. P O � nN y/ 6 Y ^�$ LN O L �N ar y V•d•O.ii O q W O L J C uY nO Lr .4 O + p1 A' N nG N ! $ Va N 'd ,�L, L ui L L �6G l TL L OV.c CLVL A b.^✓ Q C Ka ✓` W 6 WNLO Oc py^•O- L .�✓ a, y`•^ NOn Mb -OJ PL L� d✓ lC d� t a^ N � Y ,L CJ L6ra'C CY d O�`NT 6L yCC N - N.. •+O NO � n qq VN A O qL q L J q N 4 T-Z S 6 Pj� �1 W 6«� V V d O y..y� C✓ I C a n^ S L q� LLn CY n N Y � >a' ^C V g O C ` 3> R y a N N J` L U M b ry y y > q (� W _ N� W ✓O« V NqQ O L 4 ON �N$ O YC] LtV Vnu_ C�^ � P W3 V^ CL frN LWnu T✓^ tad M NdL V r Van > OL GC NNLr O.y Oa Au~O NQM rtaL N� L Vq✓�P 4NN •-t qs^ y0 _ o_ v'L. y. Yc`e Lv a v✓ $q y> o P o ai'L pb� � �L'+v✓.- J`c r;� c ` 3. 3 TW }19 C N F C9. CCV LC' CA ✓reY^kC YW G Ql yG1L VL y6.O. C E n uN fq,a bin ^ YbW raL> O N4 G��O'IFN� ` LM Lk lJq �4 OLC• q. Vd 4 � C$ L C CC N q Y C' -V N O^ y pI yL1 d� L'r ✓Corr _ �Y ^rdru T N� aW.. 4 9a U�` ntl^ 4M OWa✓ dO1N' W L"'•^ NTGn JCr JM nO LM6 VA [V{W^ u y u u L L: J ^M ^ d q L e yyu $i• yC W✓ NZ cc: T. 4 O HyW g� NO QL IUWVPuup NgVN QVN 6C Q9�ni/1n4� 00 gLOL.I rF C VI .4 YT LO A m Oa V�� r N A V 1 0 u � L � .v.a a, •� .` r� • V i... n �u� V C UO fY� • O V^ V^ .� V. J « ^ •.G N N 4�v^ � C9L ��L C� „ ^N O tI M W •u V � �V C C O tI V C_Y r_ L � 4 b 9 a V u L q V •' u G q (:r O �q` V « u� V d •.O-• Y N to C Y Jh 4,• q« O y r pY O 4 6. V q T ^ F p. � > O T r J V✓rr N • q j•y 4 d�\ C N N V O V ar 1�L C L d J l u ` ^ n n O g v L u N^� • C L' O« N u .A C A q V q u C •�L y .^ � � q 21 NNC.fI Y V•� NI. lLY4 VO � ..� ON'OL cSG O N ro n „ rw q ..p •-1-^y •N' Y w.=u «i � .'y ^ v Lq• d« � N c i r`: Jri > - ...:•^. � u li i Y V W u o:� � O G q C N L C C \._ • Yl V 4 4 1 b V Y n N C J•W 6 4 u ~Y IJ V 6A L N V V'u V L �•. •V^ ^ •M-• 1-:sY z=t- y .� TNL40 ` L L^ r •'•: V y l « rJ .Ir LO. , �L ` bV LJ vi C Wm yuW � WCNi4 •� O Y O L N V n d N(` V O O YL C n L N L l l O C V V c a8 CNN L L q Y ^ 9 N V .� p t N i � q'•" L Y O.'a q r ry W C L A p Y m C V•-• _ N•• N� ?� L O� IViI r"T 4uCO L Tu q GC V. C py. 4 LVc `un A A (�� CS L �� V� ��ry� TkS4V y[CO C4• LAVI� q� ^ ^V Yr V «V �y 6Y V9 O:L W' S «L bV1^u 6p ON « OC.`.rV� qA Liru 40« LO VLCV «•� V ^ L V �" o�� � a� >.o �°AS�r «N Yq�° a��' �VVLL. Y• a. � � ,� �•v '^ Y o ^� Lb �<J N� L.. .-«� sN «N a:"w'. c .4+«A N •L«� v `- '° ` p V W �OC 1Y�1. yp al E. NY L� r N� pp V 4• Q M6 4q NO N QN W�. LJ[ h• Y WrF �/pV L L Hd Nf6 I.•ON � ULdty G •�~ L •M•I r Z W 0; f0 W XI I 'd 1AdWL m U) Y « C N� q 72 C No o v^ rWll' qw c.c c i n n15 ^ C 1` • ^� N q N NI C N q'•7 N Y •Ce L •T N V ^ V i W adn� •"• W NC qV d .e} aIL qn LLVU eCJ .� ` adI AL AC L b•r0. C � (a y_ (V� q ^ q 'O (♦. ! •nn ^ ` > = C L V C_« N V •'• L _ _ y aI V [, O•� U y Hf as S OW « n =V V • L� VO: rLnOG >NQ pd LC•Z > ^ n W C..L. PLO WC NO E Mr LC VC [04i CIL Z 1n .{•) � qv `r CY uV \rN � LVO JY41•yW VIL dN `JV p •V L. O YO VS •�V Vu bL Y� (' ^_ NCO ^ f•' ^� q r � rM r•' O O J � V F O 6 d V N q C � �� W 'J V C y N i yIC 00 •^ y Q. Y L i�• «i..i �+ y d C M A it u a/ V TJ Y O !3 O O Q Y Y V N ^6 a N > aI C V y } .r.. O W S. .L F ^C ay� pC•' •Z Q J O^ VpVI Y•L, L' OC COC I^p..N. qVq -nq0 CILrO 6q IOi1=L0 d Od �` V Y � (F L N OG P `yV O N« C Nu CAO. NSL NL ..N. O lOY... ♦ 6 Y VC O C •1J O q IJV �aO• ^Owl i �q�° of ) no. ....'.° .L. _'2a` " " gtpi q ••pp A �• L �=y V � �� q 4 O •f 0 (r V q C �9 .0�N n ^N 6 A' 1 al q d C T ^`• l' q O O O O C C ^ A Ou uV^ OT N6C t6 >T L4L yo VVv NVq� `u E ` (� f�` M O O Y 6 Oy N O'Y� 4N b�D > Y L u0y .GY 0. V C >ru «r 46 p pI V V�• .� n M V � C^ M OZ 4JO W >N qDN LCO. T^ gfn Ap 06 COV O.�p ^ 2 Jun fT CyV. � Y L i fO L V yC Y^ e «qV LW qVn VC JwA OVY ^� L � Lf`_ Vf , Ul d d >: ^ L � s- •NNg pcm �o .Wi�.p. v � qv.N. roA� cn «tea ^ � L Py `(�:..� L• �1 d U q 6ry ^ T .•. V Y.� a y V N V„'L 4.^-. V ti� 0 O.O O L ` u C V N O V G +•L'•.q L .�yR Y d dNYY^f 4L pp N HT V 4 � KVV rGC L` yN QY. 6•C•A 6rilr H4 4d0 40NN < IOn tirL C1 yp p (V I'II1 V In .O 1� yj a O _ � In N � J FL• 4 V N XI I xl I I xl XI X� I I XI xl t hu o rN N ti O 4 � w W Y ✓ �� .. _ P C ✓ L T P N L V � LV. O a,•"' 4 6 N b V a C '� � fy y F- t^Zr P d. ._ V ` y O .L• V� ✓ y_ l' C _d fi pu b 1. P C O ~ ^ •V O V• T✓� L Y N B A N Q r N✓ L P N V l O jJj � � y N C uLu C OY SON 4 VC lVY GN �L ✓b O_•1u^L_ •� ..P v ✓ I a'ViN G d rp V W 4 6 N U' � PL p V N u N✓.' lJ u O v L u•` � � O 9 � N 4 c P W c I o V d C O L O C a _ V ^ b w u y ` L � L ` u T •n'.r _ L36L bbLP ✓ L•` b G 'N 2" 2 Nip •rdP � L,Nna Swj OC. E: WO O O •� N 'i44 CVV W Ol NOS d 4NN ^ N�_ TNNC �{ ✓« yry S:S:L'! N � Cr L ry ,. O•qN O b N N • N « G V P v V O d m N p V' L i I,L d ^ i b N .. d L"� Y ,V4 C C NV NN42 {` N..O. S u ,V, (l NF ` �j� V 4 ` N•Cn r, N u it L a Y c"i .,c ._ 'c �a ^ L �v .N. '� 6 P �1/• -I-III � N bu NO W,V Wv' C ^ Nun b6✓ `« C^ C a'4tJ GL YNnOW K Vim• C ` '.f V' 4N YN<, A� mu on. •� ... .. „u.'.` .•o.U^ L_ O a 4 ci: p o ) cer v c _y SI ? c= •p, ` c.-. O C O •n L u n o li i.. ` ,n i••V. L' m � u O o q � �'L y v '�^ w N L 4 �'a i N�m •NnNa- ✓N yea c .o..N. s, ONu q' 1 �, ✓✓.. 4 «� � U_` C _ ✓ „O• d W 4 a « > •^r�L WNC RO G `LO ✓ N`•V •OrNV VWCb� 4w,D N^ N O O ` V y 44•-V. � 6o \Ca r`yy a0 V O VNO u•Lu• �rVV -^ �,O` YpNN Y d �J OLV �Nrn ry aN.i q^ .,, .. Y .•,},-. 4 LL L« F « >< a w r.. k�•`u« AtiA coa cu •c N R �N u2• ^ �AV U Y•O•�u M NS W V N yE •C •A� T.AO N 2� U O'q P N G•O L N O t P W.•E.rr N G^ C ,n u 4 4• 1� y L M C A N S ` ^ •n d V•� N i LL.i < O N N 4 4 C V •-Y C l u P_ O qC 4 L d W V — y. 4 ^ O •„V L i O'A u W W N y6 • u 7 u LL'<u^ �G L •VQ N O� O✓ W Q CVI a '_V C N 4 NCp L_ `TJ N✓ Iv •-0-. ,.CnCN Lb A.•Y. GOW bu O•✓ [lA 1_ ' •. 0 ^ ^ W 11iN V v b Pu L •L O iJ Or� wti YV PVC a�`J u�L o'SL "N_L^ PwG _O LA1G1d� V 7 „S •{,• N w. N1• •r• PG rnu MO OS CP,� j LNV 6C yyV CN ^OV i^O�••N. V•O o_ Co h + CO C {+ O •• V.4..L 'bqd M« O•n IV V NO« QVL pVI]«4 L• C� RVIG a'LyNjL V } VN ` Lp ^ L •• V O ACC fJ.A dAu N Oc• m J L VT N a P VLO. t701•r V QN 4 N hp V• Q y • �' (,r a y O 4 N C CA O 4 M u ^N V N N x 1 V W _ _ .7••AC✓O� La N NGO dNu 4'V_b O,pu u'V ✓ C d ^C O N G V • V q N b N✓ 7_u� - C am✓ w 0 4 � > 6 C F. � C C L N N � quN nOTC ^ y V qU✓ L V'OpN dTL ^^ u V_VN C 46 � •.- 6 ✓ GNr Lr- u ,n GG ^L � CVY .NO E'N� >, rNO6 C uL V �O U «N✓ V �N W� 6 �O G C m•iyn V (J ^'•U' QO � L b •n � O u N N O U,n =v L d -•LS •°•_.—i T.d. $ CNO r. NC 3• � 9' ✓�' y 4 .. � n!b ^ = P � P Ca iE ��'� •Ur•4 G0•_ -C NC... N VtC.'t l- JU•^ VJ O ✓N•-'.4W. d •�N•+nu '^ ✓b ,-C, ^y vV Lu`• rGVWiu«} Lr=+ M 4`Ay m.W-.V L r c'V W V.� y �._ �b ^^ qP G UG OV ✓LN VYp..V> � `GF CV l"W� Cir •b•-•r P•- LO.+ L -- N 4� m _U L L _ C DV y V O_V OV✓ M4 O N N -� VA [1 N ✓' .iO.N� N LZ .`cu u N uN�'�g 6f >,a � ✓ ` o i P 4reC_ Iy w^I�Gu pL oo` WN - P �� } Q 3 �YN VWyQ LY, ULN Vurd \. C C � G,C-, P VG _ �� ZNW«CUT4 V•' O.0 OI«64 W ✓V rCO p=jL NOO ! N4 O b � C L ,✓„ lam ' �• d L C ..L V q ,U•, C ,Go^ Z,VN` V V Y l' W C C'Y 4 W P N ✓N ._ y b b L d ru c q V V � d P W N EC•r N _ 4 0 + Y L.,7� O._ N N•- ✓ Lp� p 6 ,p' N i b0 V V {O l_C L v'V. N L 6 V C ^ V N \ �` ✓� Q GTV6VN Vim O, r4�� O�arb � VV� yVG 4�h LL k.2NN L CC VO SDI L u i N d N T LY__ b P n u `«� V N O•N L�� V O d V Y O � y .r C N �-- V Z.•r NOb �ya � •O O: V•� V •,O�y CJ P4 ._G E�by r. {' VL N CLL C✓ p a O• O C u y C F_ O O' 04uOdNC U� ^`b N� OV W ^ 5 'V M NO 6N LWY NPNW ^ O a' O ^A C y Y V V C•.- V LNG^_ VV_ 'Jtu 1]✓ LC �' LGO Vim^ P"b C.0 PNpaa L Z �y l• mM « O •Fi• A4': p4 w Na CN YLG� V GN ha, jg N•-•L .� ._ p u e rCo yE�`w vwcr•:.V c'-'+ Fyc o � 6 G'�n v NP AeNu 4...v O✓'uV � OEP CV'V• ,• �O9 6LN =q•^ NN •b-.d•^ 6 .•v. V L � l VL YC O GL y �JNLLt^n' YO_4 5 `C... G S� 'V COS L«M tiJG fINNN O � y}jb LW {'�/ ^ � WC -LO C. 00�gb L, LVU A'00 Yr•' ^JN ZZ ^1`doC r0 N b �•• } G C L $� wJ— GI+ V6p C yu ••Ci N« •'• rV O ..-. y 4"" ^a 4 ` C �S�N o�f' Nu Vb C ✓N �� _ _FBO S�yb m ^V dN Y•Yuu YA✓•>�� VV u �- JY 04 L' n'•`_ _ jr} ••p} V G N wW a O a O N A _� O f q L9 GyyJO �j Ob •ti.b CC CL1 PN Ny •V{VE 4N6N NLNV6 mb qN n {i C•^` NCO y LGy^w• N VOi6~ CN ^ Try MICy 'C� ` Cu VC NO4 y NNN N '•• �•TG V PC OC G 09.r_u�V NO.. •f ._ � V gLgG q Mj••^ LL.= •r.�V .. d Oti Our O ( NO oN c O V Pn G«y NO '�• 4 LSi✓ ONCgN OnT4 .->.« � � V 4 " L �G � �`• .C,� r.-y dk� m�W.�y qG. •C O'O y •� Wq OVO « ON�4 ✓Y Vu•` b �a o N 9G2 z4• {iA C+N iN .ONi �O. •n h L or'� pNuv��a o_ ,Nn •-'us ��.`. rl. P ...�.^ .G.�iV ✓P c..� `b� :"• ' N a (� �4 a.� pl vN >cc c ciN j Y � N•^^ ` o� n4 •^`o.�.u.- N oN .- u u. a� � =•1 .1 �•O ZOM La UC •-._.._ S hL LC^� GL Y ` V N N N N � •-'.J N O G•=n N V 4. U O 1] p>/ L W W W L l p ^ O C .•1 O C w C - �. O iLb9LV Ll • �O Y h 'L 00 N 6 V W fOV •y« ��..• 1 <V N 1 I WI •I ai � o tf W V J -V1 L T V ~ y•n v « v f'u LL u > TJ L N �' i L n - N 44 d C NOF A - f� ` � N'� N u•/V.V Q C TV C• 4 'C +V Y `CL O C ' N . N bN u Y.Ni rbj � Y (J •Jq - �Y C - Nq Y V ~i Y V b � f C l b 1" •U V L O '� •- � O u '�^ .l•.• q G T Ql �• o i:' Oi.- o u L L u�V « C >.V a sbi n r p G q N .'� i'rn � vq.r_ c c `c m .a. �"D� rb+ .a. Y c a "" c -• O ' �' M �Ni.V ` "'` •unu N7 �J ub zp .. "' U� .- t0 iaL cL nC i_ b 'oo a o0 D li^ .. a A _ G L 0 •Oi� y � L O O� V V V L C A a' L W U O 4 V �� �^ L' Y M V 'n -�' a 2 s.�. '� 3 �. .�...� w` A >, n« •N•iJ •cJ c .A• y U/ G L b G•O� V d a O L L t, N L« V a.N N QI y L V/ ^ LV.r ^ N JJ^ •.r ^CW- N q du .- t.. GVV •'Lav C' VO aW Nu L tJ•n trl/ •L ✓u � _r 1•J 1' p• L O W V'q N p y Q !.� C O L V n N O •- C N D Ll q„ W p 2 V u l V GO yL `O '-4 .� V � � fJ �� ^Y L � O O.y V•L «A :� " V �.•. ^�+ W �JU O`. r� '_" � P ` T £L NAr V ] I- u•.. " T � �V > Lr� L. U' L Li� -• •- V6 `rD � P I^ O F .C^ yN V � nG p D Qc TYui oCnO NLV j[ 3 Y u CL ML Vy dU .d L W� iP "rn y � N fN' N u .._ _p .. d ...y C w W.. 'Oy Nc bt. C ASP by � o« :�1_ " c �r.'v .1'•s 'u v vUJr u 4 Y•�' tA. � `u 6 C V � a q p Q/ b g f: .. _C W W y ^ c 6 L i W O Aq b•- 4NAL Q «` 04 nLN c2 Nm n� � ��� uW L " � yn �d N � uo y,: d J.� uL• N PNLN V � d Y O p ^ U�•ry 6L O (U dW\y' CW d« ^Y �u „ram A ^ W C W6.0 p nP N C f1PT L yb 0 C C L _> C' FJ L J Y q L', rl i w cN mL.^ ry .� m� L 7 cv � •c-iJ rb � L 2 S- .N. L ^u Y o '°^• L m i 7 L N G Vy CC F b ` u � IJ n tA.i� L �rqr �L W V N V V a � I[ j W •_r T P j d 6 v Z4 Ub C�< U .G. VOA 4L ud � _ � nN Q 2 Nu j•-. Hw � NL Ou ^G ^ � day^ 4q O ^I r d • WI ^ S 6r. J N U J 4•"L. OJ � rn Y J t C W L Y F « W W n• � 1 FO •L- Li •L d V N�� OC y u •coc L aw .p• yn 'vi G !'d S'? "' .L- w`�� q .u. .��v •!, �«t N D A c o 4 y 7� w N •K T•. � u«a'� ' n t o w c ^ q«p b ar T U � _L 1 N � � !V L b N U « V O u T �u v.l• U�.C_ ^ _C V V W G M N•-y� N n W - O V G N NLV AV uV Vu q �w ' VW `- y06 ..C-�« d �.a..�u uqi L GOPd LJ;N x x LJJL C C= - A L d �'y' LVOu W Yq PL l]L •pf r b 6 � I n d .r•Cr v� ` `V � l W i 1• N Y n_ O♦ u C C .-. G u V ;`I• d O O, b` ` '6 _ 1�j4y L Nu r�•y..t �q W x x �Nq VL `6 N�OV W uu t N�u 4•-•CC N G G� �� G �� .�` C J �G V ��G V G O � y � 9 V V 4 u O. W Z O L V y O L N Y E • rC. LL6 C. T^N d `y, O N N q 4 2 z E L �n CNw CV i6' O D^qy� 4<uJ:. = VY NV OVd B V+ L« I W L pr W {a u pr x W b«•.• p L 02 T p�u L' • - C�• V r W' 00 « ^ VV p x YC« `� -1 Vt y VV p BOG r b.CA L. 0 QA CO rL..^ > C L]Q � k4'•- } W« c u 2 C �b oL W s Dc pr A L &G S O q to 2 6 .L•u L ;V V�r W r.' �.MO CO �•-. 4y Cl>O nvC r O•rl pG �r'LPnu � �� ^ 7 C 0���6 �l « vrrA (yC{ra d0 ^Cy 'L rn.I C N�[ yr•CWd qFW r•� L AgCL •E-NL +u VLSLEV w L N a• q« N N N y q ` r QI C O • Our O <i LO•5 L� L o f O •I }00 Y YV WO L^ ^ud NrLn ll� �qL 9GV Ly/Y 4Cb L C�a 1 � � b Or `q Ou„ •26 x x C DAw fU` n4u yL-� 011 G� �u7„C "•' �M 'w� cN JJc�� o P m... � M.•• �ibW Ycq�� p wy '^ v.+' win .A}• d•Wr �:i 2� 2A _c u' .L..b• �a� x x a 1C'P'� c F'�.y•`y- aJ(cu M� «u c+rO 4�`rr L O •- O A L G C LO a H 01 N �n� Y L•-W Wb LC L N u L Yr N •i W V n. .•G. V O� 4 U« 6 A Q O' W) L V V u O C b y^A u L g 4 q V �ur u N M 1'uA• u«i�N G L y _ ^ y Q' G aL NV Nyw 64 Vp100� KV nw W L AqL yak} a�a �o ..N c. 9 •O p 'C9 O •b+ O I 1 N N u G < V W pV�jj VVL .� N N1'- O u LLC V O•"emu L_••7 b �L ' Y OCC ou.q- u� V� r• w N N L N u «^� V U P A O L N u d W N J]W u c� ...^� $ � FF� u .o.•$E p Ay^d O O L. N }•� V L cc Y 9«•O T N •� C V J C U &ep, N W + « J d V V VI J.T/ EYV � � O CUC V v A •O fUY UY ^ qpp W F C L �' W Vpp N OY i� I� NW N W 7 LV�V 9C ��EI XV cm TL N > L V O•� J. N > w N Y L ry u u«}M yn yo`r, i L m W^ � (PyY C 'y�0 �pLVV It Wd qL]C pUN �� 4W N�d4 - fTT >I N l•C C u (yyu Y LL A WQ uL�V A L Y d �V LJ nl OuY�Q CLG V WJ •cN U Ad G.� tV u •!2 W dL Ou A O CY Tyd O•U> q � UV E 0 9 u L N a 6 N w Cyr W Y O Y i u N C i W 0 4 tl0 9L i^u 9 TC U.. V4^ > 9 NC L AS `r�M '�: V� < �i �y u N � ^� C� � p � u O V.•. o ti. c G p T V i rC.i L �` V L V V O�VI W L U d • OyN V L.--. W q Ti] c ✓. T Y..\ N L L L A W W Vf G C X V W c uo.P da>� n W y N a� mo qL r• L..L•VNL O L (ue Q�p Y V 4J yY u � n 6Y- CW P ` 4r NL 4 � I qOC CO L14 L d •-• C C L U•�� 2••C. 1•��I � V � !V xl vl XI XI xl �,A r RESOLUTION NO. l A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNED DEVELOPMEWT NO. 81-14 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R-1 TO R-3/P.D. FOR 23.6 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARROW ROUTE AND TURNER AVENUE. APN 208-34-9 AND 11 WHEREAS, on the 13th day of October, 1981, an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of November, 1981, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following-Ti d ngs: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surround- ing area; 2. The proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on November 25, 1981. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: L. 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of November, 1981, Planned Development No. 81-14. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Planned Development No. 81-14. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council . 4. All conditions of approval applicable to Tentative Tract No. 12040 shall apply to this Planned Development. :fir Resolution No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAMONGA i CY: Jeffrey ia.Zgg, Ch rman i, ATTEST: ry. Secretary of the Plarinirtg�uinission 1. 1 , JACK LltM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, aG hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hiid on the 25th day of November, 1981, by the following vote-to-wit: d AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ;OMMISSIONER.S: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r a: r: G. : .5i S' 6 l' -- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT a J � O r O F � Z U 3• 1977 DATE: November 25, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: gaol: Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Tim a. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PIAN REGARDING BUILDING CONTRACTOR'S SERVICES AND LANDSCAPE SFTBACKS ALONG 7TH STREET EAST OF DEVORE. ABSTRACT: This report discusses two matters which have arisen unfore- seen regarding conditions on development within the Industrial Specific Plan area. In order to address these unforeseen considerations, the S;.ef:ific Plan should be amended to provide for building contractors with venic-lar storage in other areas and to reduce the landscape set- back requirements adjacent to railroad spur rights of way in the Heavy Industrial area. The recoiru endations in this report have been proposed by the Industrial Committee. BACKGROUND: Recently two matters have arisen regarding development standards within the Industrial Specific Plan. These matters were unforeseen at the time of the development of the Industrial Specific Plan. However, with minor modifications of the standards dealing with these matters, the Industrial Specific Plan can be made to address the concerns. One item is the inherent similarities in the. existina definitions between "Building Contractor's Storage Yard" and "Building Contractor's Services". The Commission may recall that the purpose of "Building Contractor's Storage Yard" is to provide for the location of storage yard facilities for heavy equipment in an unscreened manner. This use has been shown in the Heavy Industrial category of Subarea 15 east of Devore Freeway. The purpose of "Building Contractor's Ser- vices" is to provide for building contractor's uses including their administrative function as well as the storage of equipment and materials. Recently a grading contractor proposed to locate their administrative offices and storage area. on Lucas Ranch Road, just no-h of 4th Street, however the Industrial Specific Plan would allow this use only east of Devore Freeway in the Heavy Industrial category. The proposed site design has the storage area screened from the view by the offices and other add'.tional screening. The use is appropriate for the General Industirial category, especially in Subarea 5, and therefore could be considered acceptable under ITEM D Industrial Specific Plan Amendment Planning Commission Agenda November 25, 1981 41 Page 2 the requirements of the Subarea. The Commnission should consider amending the definitions between "Building Contractor's Storage Yard" and 'Building Contractor's Services" to more clearly define the difference in activities and to amend the land use summary in order to provido for Building Contractor's Services in Subareas 1-5, 8, 11, 13, and 14. Conditional Use Permits would be -equired in Sub- areas 4 and 5 in order to assure compatibility with the adjacent park cate- gories and to assure protection of the view along 41,h Street. The Industrial Co:^mittee has made this their recommendation. The other matter which was not given consideration in the Industrial Specific. Plan was the appropriate landscape setback adjacent to a rail spur which runs parallel to a public street. This situation has arisen regarding a proposal to locate a rail spur_running parallel adjacent to 7th Street, east of Devore. The problen with this occurs when determining the appropriate landscape setback. The Commission may recall that under the Industrial Specific Plan, the land- scape setback along 7th Street is 35' from the ultimate face of curb. When combined with the required railroad easement of 30' , the property owner is required to have a total overall setback of 65' from the ultimate face of curb. The overall setback requirement puts a more onerous burden on the property owner. The landscape setback is more than necessary in order to achieve proper spacing between the buildings and the street frontages and in order to achieve appropriate screening. It would he appropriate to modify the landscape setback in this Subarea along 7th Street from 35' to 20' where adjacent to a railroad spur right of way pr•:,!ided that the landscaping is designed in such a way to help screen the luading activity. The Indus- trail Committee has recommended that this change he considered. Both of these amendments to the Industrial Specific Plan have been reviewed for their environmental impacts and it is Staff's recommendation that these changes will have ro significant adverse affect and an issuance of a Negative Declaration should be completed. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that should the Planning Commission concur with these changes in the Industrial Specific Ilan, they approve the attached Resolution amending the Industrial Specific Plan. Respectfully submitted, r� '•+-�....,,,_�__ � f w1 n ,�• Wes' JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:TJB:jr Attachments: Summary of Land Uses by Subarea; Planning Commission Resolution Cl.r-' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIA.LL STUDY PART I - PROJECT T_NFORMATIO;i SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Asc•eissment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental rcview, this i' form must be completed and submitted to t:lae Development Revie e w Committee through the department vinere th project application is mad(-_ Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Ir,itia' Study. The Development Reviey. committee tiiLl meet and take action no later than ten '10) r?.ys before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations : 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan APPLICANT 'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 a; Rancho Cuc.pmconga, CA 9173U r: NAME, ADDRESSS, ":.LEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING T"'ZS PPOJECT: _ Tin! .1_ Readjf±. Seni.ir Planner ' LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. ) 111 A LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND 4p� FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: t N/Q Tw1 i r ' ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT.- Amend the Industrial Sp !cifir. Plan to provide for Buiidino Contractor' s Services in other a •eas and to redixe the landscape setback along 7th Street, east o. Devore Freeway- when adjacent to a ra roa sour. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: N/A DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PF.OJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) ,, ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DES-RIPT]ON OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : N/A Is the project, part of a larger project, one i)f a series - of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant envirornnental :.mpact? I- 2 ;ti WILL THIS P: rJECT: YES NO ` X 1. Create a substantial change in ground {' contours? r, X 2. Create a substantial change in existing `r. noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! X 44. Create changes in the existing zoning or en desi general plan gnations7 r, x_ 5: Remove any existing trees? How ma:,;;' X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: b 1: h „ IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of 't. residential units, complete the form on tha next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and . . information xeauired for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of 'i my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted t< before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date ovember 17. 1981 Signature Title _Senior Planner �C-3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECOMMENDING AMENDMENT TO THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN REGARDING BUILDING CON- TRACTOR'S SERVICES AND LANDSCAPE SETBACKS ALONG 7TH STREET, EAST OF DEVORE WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing in order to consider amending the Industrial Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission seeks to improve the Industrial Specific Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that the Industrial Specific Plan be amended a-- follows : SECTION 1: The land use definitions be amended as follows: "Building Contractor' s Storage Yard: Activities include the maintenance and outdoor storage of large construction equipment such as earthmoving equipment, cranes, and out-door storage of building materials in an unscreenegnpiere" "Building Contractor's ities typically include, but are not limited to, s rvices pmed off the premise by building contractors or by any of the trades involving con- struction activities including but not limited to plumbing, painting, electrical , roofing, carpentry and other services and the storage of equipment, materials, and vehicles". SECTION 2: That the "Surrimary of Land Use By Subarea" be amended as shown n attached Exhibit "A". SECTION! 3: That within Subarea 15 of the Industrial Specific Plan, the following special consideration be added: "Where a rail service spur is necessary adjacent to 7th Street frontage the landscape setback may be maintained at a distance no less than 20' from the ultimate face of curb extending to the rail service right-of-way. Landscaping within this area shall be designed in order to help screen the loading activities". AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission finds that this amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment and therefore recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Resolution No. Page 2 �j BY: }: :'effrey King, Chairman A ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I , JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1981, by the following cote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: i; NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: V j� a r •l ,d 1 TABLE 111 -1 EXHIBIT A SUMMARY LAND USE TYPE BY SUBAREA MITF IlgF r ICE USE TYPES St)BAREAS 1 2 3 4 5 fi 7 8 9101112131415 MANUFACTURING Custom • 0 • • • • • @ • w • o • • Light - :, r .n., ,, ,-: a a� • o • • o • " • • ® e ' o_ , _Medium ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 0` a o w o 0 t1itJIPtUM IMPFICT,HEAVY IIDUSTRIAL,. • • eav - WHOLESALE STORAGE DISTRIBUTION Light • • • w • 040 • 00 a e • 0 0 0 COMMERCIAL Administrative and Office 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ •� Agricultural Supplies and Services 0 • • • • • e Animal Care ., s �^"" ,._ zr ❑ p _ _ Automotive Fleet Storage ❑ o ❑ ❑ Automotive Rental .a� - ^ • • ❑ p ❑ t7 ® � a Automotive 1 Light Truck Repair-Minor o • Elo O o x m o • o ❑ Automotive 1 Truck Repair-Major ""`"" ^` ® ' • e a 0 ❑ Automotive Sales ❑ ❑ ❑ .M r -- , y ..� „t, ` Automotive ServiceStafson � .n+,��_;,r. . :; O ,-,� o ❑ � '❑ ❑ ❑ '-- :-. ❑ ❑ 'p ❑ ❑__ .� Building Contractors Services 0 • 00 0 0 0 0 0 BUILDING CONTRACTORS SERVICE.YARDS • Building Maintenance Services W _; 0 • e • • • M1t e • e e : . Building Supplies and Sales • _0 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ • Business Supply Retail Sales and_Services:;'.', • • w o 0 0 0 • e 0 ; •:� Business Support Services • 0 0 e o 000 0 0 00 0 00 • .Communication Services ""�:""7a; 0. . :. • '0 0 0 • o 0 0 0 • ❑ 0 ' Convenience Sales and Services ❑ C 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ ❑' "_'Eating and Drinking Establishments 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e • e e e • 0 0 *- Entertainment ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _ ❑ _ Extensive Impact Commercials L �`y" ❑ Fast Food ❑ 0 00 0 ri ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 n ❑ U ❑ Financial, insurance and Real_EstateServices ❑ -_ ❑ 0 ; o 00 ❑ • . Food and Beverage Sales ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Funeral and Crematory Services" .:.",;;�::;. `� ; Heavy Equipment Sales and Rentals ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • " Hotel / Motel _.. ..,,-:_•. ...: ,, -•.— . - . ,. 0 0 0 e. ..._.d ..._. ._._.-_ _. Laundry Services o • a e • • • ``Medical I Health Care Services•' ,"'""' _` ❑ ❑ w • • ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ • :; Personal Services ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C ❑ ❑ .,_ Petroleum Products Storage ";""; _._.;: ❑ o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Professional Services ❑ 0 • 0 0 Recreation Facilities " .... ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 01010101 ❑ ❑ ❑ • 0115101 • _ ; Repair Services 0 000 G 00 00 0 0 Scrap Operation _ ... 0 _civic Administrative Civic Services • 0 • 0 • • • e 0 0 0 Cultural ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Extensive Impact Utility Facilities ❑ ❑ n ❑ ❑ ❑ Public Assembly _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ D ❑ ❑ ❑ Public Safety and utility Services n n n n ❑ n ❑ C ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ •Religious Assembly n n n ❑ ❑ ❑ n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ NOTE: Non-marked uses not permited , IT?_r, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �Moy STAFF REPORT ® r o' o F ? U =' LQ77 { DATE: November 25, 1981 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SUBJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ON ASSESSMENT DISTKiCT 79-•1 GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH FARROW TO 4TH STREET BETWEEN TURNER AND DEVORE FREEWAY ABSTRACT: This report summarizes the Draft Environmental Impact Report to the Assessment District for the industrial area described above. In order for the City to consider adoption of the Industrial Assessment ® area, an environmental report has to be completed. This report summarizes the impacts and proposed mitigation measures. The Planning Commission is considering public input on the resort in making a recommendation to the City Council. BACKGROUND: The Assessment District 79-1 emcompasses approximately 514 acres and is located in the southern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It is bounded by Arrow Route 3n the north, Interstate 15 on the east, 4th Street on the south, and Deer Creek Chanhel on the west. i (See Attachment 1). The purpose of the Assessment District is to pro- vide a means of funding for drainage and capital improvements in the industrial area. through the use of a levied property tax assessment. The proposed projects are to provide drainage and roadway improvements which are basic "bare bone system" in order to allow for development in the described boundary. The basic improvements to the Assessment District are shown in Attachments 2 and 3. In order for the project to be adequately reviewed and to assure com- pliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the City has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Report reviewing all the impacts of the proposed project. Much of the long-tern impacts have been addres- sed in part by the Industrial Specific Plan; however, inasmuch as the improvements of the Assessment District require more detailed analysis it is necessary to have an environmental analysis of these effects in- cluded with this report. A summary of the proposed impacts and miti- gation measures is included as Attachment 4. Reference pages in the ITEM E :r, - Assessment District Draft EIR Planning Commission Agenda November 25, 1981 Page 2 Environmental Impact Report to the detailed mitigation measure has been indicated. The purpose of the public hearing is to provide an opportunity for public input on the Draft Environmental Impact Report and for the Planning Commission to make a recoimnendation on the certification of the Environmental Impact Report to the City Council in order for their consid :ration at the time of the Asses- sment District. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission complete the public review of the Environmental Impact Report and consider a rov�al of the attachaC Rasolu i R_j commending certification ofiT"{Tie t ironmP al ImEaact Rt�ort to the City Council . Respectfully submitted, JACK LAIN, AICP t; Director of Community Development JL:TJB:jr Attachments: Area Map Proposed Project EIR Summary Planning Commission Resolution •i ,r i; Cam � M � o C a „ oat%% auraw.guuaW PZ _ _ �� (� 76 i IY�yw`` e ouYy prTr ��. :r � •u_u uy�aiuiYounuiL �: ?`~ 1 �+rnui.;fnpv.+ . cn rn L 71 N o •+�'zlf���,�l� Y � 4 Y ¢ fix.}-.9 •.•.•':`•:.Y '` �;""� ✓1 r` r Myy.Vf 1::. 2( l'll lA � ""'• � ✓ •�::Svi �tti...t.wYtn.��wm�irArSYf,r(Cf�}}�'�('a i.vfy.• ;.•:4.y '"yl ���'dif'.� � ��:✓t jly w s ':c •',.4• -<r 111_'a'•�:• v�L �f 1 �i..:id t r ��,. N .✓r,:4.!{{�:•iI�NN•� n r F,g+fi"fir/q���ur� (���'N�{'/.1t'•y�� i�"• also 111 . . 51�u uuaf,('f g iurluauYnC t C��f' b�'J<Ys.ro,d:�+t ' '•r gJpx xs:�v ri " ',�� � v !� n•9jNrt ,_ r�l ,Dili� �as�' fi f y r <l r �;•'� go --q ra y � > h z S .. o a ca c 0 �J z Y SUMMARY OF ATTACHMENT 2 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS AL 1. Partial construction of. Sixth Street, a major Aivided highway from Rochester to Haven. 2. Completion of Cleveland Avenue from Fourth Street to Sixth Street (secondary highway). 3, Milliken Avenue construction from Fourth to Sixth (major divided). 4. Pittsburgh Avenue from Fourth to Sixth (collector stands- 5. New Rochester from Fourth to Sixth (major arterial). 5. "A" Street a collector from Fourth to Sixth located approximately midway between Pittsburgh and new Rochester. Construction of the following master plan drainage improvements as listed: Line 5D: Commencing at the SBCFCD Channel (Deer Creek) approximately 600 feet west of Center Avenue, thence easterly in - Sixth Street, thence northerly in Haven Avenue to approximately 1,000 feet north of Sixth Street, thence easterly in a 20 foot easement to approximately 800 feet east of Haven Avenue, thence northerly in a easement parallel to and approximately 800 feet east of Haven Avenue to the south side of the A.T. 5 S.F. Railway, thence easterly from existing 8th Stree-_ and adjacent to the A.T. 6 S.F. Railway to its terminus at Vincent Avenue, a total distance of approximately 7900 feet. Line 7E: Commencing in Cleveland Avenue at 4th Street, thence northerly in Cleveland Avenue to Sixth Street, thence easterly in Sixth Street to its terminus at Milliken Avenue, a distance of approximately 5600 feet. Line 19A: Commencing in 4th Street approximately 1600 feet east of Pilliken, thence northeasterly and northerly in a future street to Sixth Street, thence westerly in Sixth Street to Pittsburgh Avenue, a total distance of approximately 3000 feet. Line 19D: Commencing in Rochester Avenue at a point approximately 1100 feet north of 4th Street, thence continuing northerly in Rochester Avenue to the south side of A.T. S S.F. Railway thence westerly and parallel to the A.T. & S.F. Railway to its terminus approximately 2500 feet west of Roc'ester Avenue, a total distance of approximately 6900 feet. Line 19F: Commencing at a proposed 72—inch RCP (Line 19D) in Rochester Avenue approximate!-- 1206 feet south of Sixth Street, thence westerly in a 20 foot easement to New Rochester, thence northerly to' Sixth Street, a distance of approximately 3000 feet. > �'T1 • 1" V A' � M. �p/+� ®w • IU I C m A A D CO ® _ 9 Ni © � ,. C ) .. t .m.. c z LEVELAND AVE �y MILLI0.ENIAVE' � s� PITTSBUHa AVE I ' _ FEET o A-cm o NEW POCHESTEH ,, :. I �• „�. F �. ter_.:.... . `�. gp �• ' Imo.. -j- '--� -I. { . .,... � rn w o Igo C' �j <. °• w .m e H. :D j: N n ( a n d cm n lb ^ m 0 �a•°° C m w y n ti wt' fN.. N toh'a w ~ p h. a0. 5 p G• R' 1-•. o y In f.. b C 0, Kag o•Ly y m m M w A ^ w rj h. q R R W h• m fD a hr co 1 p bw D •/ R q �_. 1 F. tmi R �•' H CD rD A M a a R M R p ro 9 E 0 n O p R r, G 00 (D m N �.,,� p m O h.OO hO a q f..• ^' ^' h. m aCi 0) ' °' m ^ �y C M R o C •Hr Rw �' tr m Oa �< O. fhy M m RR m q W " h to .nlb b n M h.d N m m•n m m N R "t to MM N. �" yO MH M N ry M h. �~,; a' 1"'• C w f° A 0 M 9 n � fA F, R a a fP. m '/ m 0. h. pp�� o N lbtl w� a +•' b' # N R m_ A R a Oi N m w �u p.• n R a O m•O M M a Go N m r'• N M w n '� m M h- R k CO a hR 'yf°I f^yaCL o � ..• c° n'n as a :' rgn t a R y O ,�.. O c �•Ov OO R .1 p•UQ a• 2 H O m 0 DO m a h• M R w O a :D R w 0, h O N a q O w p OM h `D qN N A •I R 'A q'N H f) N w h. N a• R a N fb-+ M 10 N ~w N R w m m n w p : O C. A m p fn A M y b hl m m m'0 C Do h.0 M p N ha. � p O A � N a R M R n• N y c w m b C g n R a A D' 0. w fD a 1mC.. M 1C+ qmR, C fD C• 'O fm N M.OQ n lb fl pO m •R� O F H m m R ►.. a h. .�y h. �p h. a M B H H R' ry m O•p• i:. N ^ R a m C M lv .a fh,,;�^, n 1�' ^ �1 a M O B H ACL I h. i 0 lb lb =CL u, o `r o- 'w v Z O y R p fyi p' M A .0 R N N fy R N ^, a m C- fC`C A• W.H. M O "' hO. N 00 � Sv w a o m �� 0 a na h ,°', 0 n w m •T a 07 7 O A 0 ~ O I R h.O CT' fOD I~+. M C N 0. o- R . c N A IM„ b h. w M y h. O R n f+ �C Ie N C �' g M � u O u u u U Y a a m a m m J :J N H w N Mtl N Y Y V a ~ O • V H W r 0 q o row o Y O i7 w o 'A W a u m Q W , a ". W •.4 p w UU •7 o Hrrro a H .OY 4 a t C u u o O W a a W �4 m O a a w a a 1 0 6o a W-.A b0 ••� ?4 W ut y W w W W O Y Y m 14 aW+ •mac m .-.r -.>i 4v u c w a a. •.a .to W a m a. a u W u 0 m m O m W a u .O Op m •A >O i.. � Sai •~.1 a H U 11 W a U H N V •p W a u Y W a 7 -A W H H Y •a CO O 7 W & W N a s .•hi W W m u a O W .-r a V H 1 O W > a W Vl O •.d L 00 Cl)v (D W 44 v W Y V a P. O W Y a •.� [a. m W •Hi O H • ca coY .�. T M .•.1 .T• a a) (U a a a a H •C N H w a a % S. Y 7 W > W W a Wa V a l V m N •O Q U i+• U W 4:. a •a a. w .'L P. W N .Wi N H (j •Y A w z H • W "C-I a ca a W u W u u a ��+ a •a �W H W m N a •.0.1 F. a Y• O O �o M V p a O a ® A a .�. w g O .•a w H ~ rn cc ^ W 1 a •t� ^.0 O a •./ y W m u a .y •,4 u+ u O m O Q• a 60 a s 60 a H a °a tUw " aoN w 8umw a o•o a o > ao70 1 7 0 Ow ma 4-.4 W a b• W w H mm w W O- w w H O. 14 m a u: r r�dn•r AUW I ~�Q WA Uu G pU •O t . O > .� .•>• -a.y V Yu C a l a W OS v•a i H Y a Y .0 m •OLa Y a iJ a7 a •C O co •a Ya la m M4uW 0) W a•.1 0 N 44 a y 9) •WG.4+ .14 • w •nw a sOp>Oro •i a W -a W W H a Cl Ng ma W > WyY UNC14 .4 0 0 a 0R 0 aU W H r�n..� y yH a U H d O93 m w W P4 a W a U L N ., V H W V1 U • O W h a N y h 2 aai O 4ai •.4 � W N W R7 w m •.>I w 7 N H O N W a L 0 ,4 W L O U a H . v W ha > k W .0 H W M gg H .••1 N en H H N H , W 6 0 , O m H u I 1 I 00 O .•+ G I W 1 > •� G u N N m U O a 1 J G >. N 4) IV U w .-+ O p -A w U J 4, L y N •ti N O U N •.1 Y M 0.•to w •.+ O H O H J J a a d V P w •.1 )< d to Y IML $4 > N u -A N O 'O O Y N m E a 'V a H U v p w 7 G p u -0 1+ V ID -A m u Y OwV J U -A t tl y .O ••1 p w •.�•.1 O w -0 70 M u T U -.1 u 0 tC p -O > m V m 7al H V -A tp a ,G O m a U a 0 •.4 O w OD a O w O O U 0. w CW3 7 m m .0. 0) L P. a O •O J u a d U H U w -A O H -A H O -d 0) $4 ?� U a .-Tt ua to to p a) U H m .A ~ a) W 7 U 044 w -.4 INJ w O ••� w u L w U H •.1 Y u u -.1 L J 4 > d u w u U u -.1 w V •-1 •.1 tw U m -O > a G N U w u u OLtb w t+ w IC w 0. J0.0 V _ •.I w -.4 UuOWC4 A W N O 7 N P. 'O C-W U -0 R o. mw w p. F o. U1J •� H O tV l w w G u p u t-I U a w m U w I J a U G O m 1 O C4 fw�. 0. .,4 H W N w u a u [0[, •.1 w d v d a u v O td m U •ri U � NO - -O w .- UW U -0 V w N M m .1 W t>7 N x �/ > O p U 0) t J a U -. P. U 13 0.a Up0 00 -.1m pXO WUU Uu O w v i1 pNm _ $1 H O w w N O U w > U Tv U 1+ m .-. m t41 w H g4g N a w m a ai w w G 00 p N -:i H 0. p .-. O 7 N O w • O w 0 O -• O -to m m w u •O 00 •OI m RU.' •O m 7 w .•>• O w > m U O-w m t Y a d U U O m J -P > H tw H u w to V O •.1-.t u 0 pw m a 7 m > V U en .•+ M 0) m m H w -U m V-.1 Y H H m O d m O P.t•1 W Y U -.1 0. m M 0. w (D •W..•1 p W 0 H • n V a P. O •.i . 0. w 7C [3 W. U -H u A Cl m a w " N T H m w U J V U 0 U w w •u m -w 0 a u ..: • N T.� H H d w O u a V a w V U m m a , Y t7 w H .0 > OW t0 w w a w pp J p G O co m d w G w to •.. . -y V Ts W V •p -0 U N `O [; N l'J d CV ? -V d. A W F , �i • H . H m U W U U F UI •.1 H O M .� Occ M H O 1 •V w w cm •. 00 w m m a 0 U a a 0 ra rn O 64 w O H w O O H no co w y 7 • e W -.Oi H a u U Y J 1 w m pcoA U U H [� m u -AV 'Y U U m m Y m m O•-.I p A a M1 a Y -O L N 7 m N •� w co 0 to .•I TJ ...1 w•� -A J O N w C'J O•A U X a F `-5 U J H C V O H L..4 G W U U . U P.-O U Y >• O � r W w0. C) -.'I w m m w M u .•� g 3 u H V m V •.1 N L" 7 aai w m G m m m m W 0.4.1 014 1044 O w el .4 00 w U -nt u u d Co a o 0) -A m a 0 a o A a ¢ V a a Y 3 u w m `-1 a •A w a w •,4 w O w a u 0 O •a m w ..1 Y L ..{ ..c m J u U TO A U -0 0 .0 U -C -A u w C) a w a m .-< w a m F 'O u U U = a s u w w -. w U Y .m-a mrn $4a '9 u w O •.1 m o. VM O w p • g •-A w A H N u w wu w 'O •y .L O Uw w w N 0 u wYw % > N u YAH m a a Vw 0) 'A 33 W a) m 44 .4 W a% fti V.1 d w u O Y M O F •ia a O to w -.V4 H H O 6 u w Y wawi O a -.4 i+ a O u y p � N W M m T H >0) W •.•1 •00 U > a O T. V H U O -.1 w u m -••1 W M m V W 0. V 0. NN •O.H u two N a) G tc •0 .1.. 0cu .G.., U 4: •.� U a H K rr ••� N M d tV V' N N N N X' J 6� rr m 7 ..a m w z •o m m � m u O m r, P •.d w u u w q m m •a u � H H U V V e m O U o m u W U H a W q o aJ + o H u 7 VJ m H • � o m m u ap •.+ u C V •O u V t0 ♦J H N H .� ..J ci .Q �• u u m m CJ m m H ^. q m q q m 0 O L O O a z u m x u 0 H 6 u u H m •� •a H m m � coi q G H VJ O O O H H 3 H t7 U q M m t9 ka m H O x u m H +•a W to O A to .+ N V o u a xakr. m .A V O OC4 u .r .-� •o m M 0 $4 m O H 17 Ll VJ fJJ OO H R7 3 to 1 V U 7 L q W O q d O a+ yV p( u H •a /Q m u y y m F m •a Q q H O a u 4 L L• 4 V W Y o U Vp 01 •1 N H a �� 5 :Sb3NOISSIWW00 :1N3SSV :SN3140ISSTWWOJ :S30N :I`e3NOISSIWWO3 :S3AV 6utmo o a `aa :a.tm-of-al.oA ll d 4l A g I86*. gwanoN 10 pep 449Z aql uo play uotssumuOJ buiut'eld e44 3o 6utlaatu aeln6aA a le `e6uowe3n3 oyoued 3o �1.tJ a4l 10 uotsstwwoJ 6utuUeld 044 4q paldope pup `passed `paonpo.Aztit 4ae060a pue llnp sem uotlnlosaa 6uto6aao.� 041 ge41 R3ta.,Aa3 fq aaaq 0p `e6uoweonJ 04oueb 10 44 Q a42 40 uotsstww00 6utuueld a42 Jo /fd.elaaOaS WV-1 NOVC `I uotSstuuuoJ 6utuuptd aql So 4j..pa.aaoaS :IS311V uemate4J `but)j kaaJ.J.ap :A8 VJNOW' onJ OHJNVN 30 AlI) 3141 30 NOISSIWW03 9NINNVId Is '186I 'N38W3AON 30 AV0 H1S2 SIHI 03ldOaV ONV 03AObddV 'ICapSSa3att aaa4m sant2eu.Aalle lle pue sa.tnseaw uotle61.4tw letlualod 6utpnLout sl3edwt Leluatuuoatnua letl.ualod 10 Aatna,A agenbape ue 6utaq Se j-61 l0!.alstO luawssassV 1pt.Alsnpul a44 ao; paaeda.Ad laodaU l3edwl Leluawu0,Atnu3 a44 10 uotleot;tla03 spuauAuo3a.A e6uoweonJ og0ueb So /,qL3 atil Jo uotsstwwoJ 6utuueld ay1 4e41 03AIOS38 11 38 `RO43N3H1 'MON }o uoL4dope a4q ut k-Aessa3au uno Ao asne3 „ l0talst0 luatussassy ayq a tssod p } p g ly6tw le4l santleu.A04Le Lq. pue saanspaw uotle6tltw Letquaq..od Sutpquo3 pup papuawe Se OZ6I do (V033) 40V S4LLefio Lpluawuoatnu3 etuao-M e0 a4l 41tm k3tw.A0AU03 ut paaed -aad uaaq se4 gaoda8 l0edwl 1p;uawuo.Atnu3 l.ae.AO a41. `SV3b3HM luawssassV a44 ao gaoda pup 'I-6L l0talst0 d d l0edwl Leluawuoatnu3 43e.A0 044 uo luawwoo pup lndut otlgnd aaptsuo3 of 6utapa4 3tLgnd pastlaanpe kLnp a pla4 e6uoweonJ 040uea d•0 )4tJ aq; Jo uotsstwwoJ 6utuueld a4l `SV3213FIM -SS3SSV 3H1 803 lUOd3d 13VdWI IVIN3WNUTAN3NISIG 1AV8013"1 30 NOIIVOI-411830 9NION3WWO33a VONOWVJnJ OHONVU 30 AlIJ 3141 30 NOISSIWWOJ SNINNVId 3141 30 NOI1nIOS38 V 'ON NOI1nIOUN 'y,l i'yA. CITY OF RANCHO C JCAMONGA 03C-AMO 1 STAFF REPORT S o F � Z � > i 1 IY77 DATE: November 25, 19cI T0: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Connunity Development BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENV IROWMENIr.L ASSESSMENT AND D1VELOPI4ENT REVIEW NO. 81-33 - C & I - The development of a 2 250 square foot office build- •ingon 3.09 acres of land in tie Industrial Park zone to be located at 10220 4th Street - WN 210-072-23. ABSTRACT: The Applicant is requesting review Tnd approval for the development of an office building for Poly Plastic Products as described above. The project has completed the Deve opment and Design Review process and is now before the Planning Commission for their review and approval. Staff has prepared a detailed Staff Report, related Resolution, and Conditions of Approval for your review and consider- ation. BACKGROUND: The Applicant, Brooks Products, Incorporated, is requesting approval of their proposal to develop a 2,2iO square foot office build- ing adjacent to the Poly Plastic Products minufacturing plant. The 3.09 acre site is located on the north side of 4 :h Street, west of Haven, east of Turner (Exhibit "A"). The site is Ilesignated as Industrial Park (Subarea 6) in the Industrial Specific Plan and on the General Plan. Since 4th Street is a Species Boulevard, this proposal require: review and approval by the Planning Commission. i Land adjacent to the site on the north and <_outh sides is vacant. To j the west between Turner Avenue and the site is the Deer Creek �:�Annel II project. East of the site is a 15,000 square foot industrial builq_*°ng. Existing on the site is the 20,000 square fuot Poly Plastic Product! molding plant with an outdoor storage area of the east side and behind the building. Also, two trailers are being ased on the site as a tem- porary office for the company. The tra*,Iers will be removed from the i site when the office building is finaled. I _ I I I ITFM F r: �1 D_1ve1opme:rt riew No. 81_33 Punning Commission Agenda November 25, 1987 Ailk ANALYSIS_ I the The project site is adeouate in size and shape bu Proposed use as shown on the Development Plan 411311). „building setbacks, landscaped areas to accommodate 9 will be designed and Parkin (Exhibit B ). A77 Specific plan 9ned and provided in accordance withIFor the ndustrial as shown on City Standards and Ordinances. ]andsca in Exhibit C indicates that the A The Illustrative P g on the street frontage Applicant intends to Provide Plan, Proposed office, 9 and on the south and east side pofvthe Access to the site is proposed circulation sPSov�ded by two driveways off ute traffic inof 4th Street. The the existing molding p ant andloutothe west drive. in the storage the east drive around spaces are 9 area just north of the parkin A loading dock exists buildice n a provided on site- Ninr•_ new spaces a�e�rPCurrently, twenty—two Office g- The Applicant proposes to locate these new stallired soff the behind an existing chainiink fence, Staff recommends that the ciiainlirrk `ence be relocated so that the 9 Of the existing parking lot. Parking ;paces can become part The elevations and floor la "DO and "E Exterior materials will n for the Proposed onsist off ice are s siding parapet and brick veneer win hwan with Exhibits a 3-foot high earth berm will ebrrt theafronttofhe�front eras*renW`th Also rendering and Site plan will be available for Commission meeting, the office,, A colored Your review at the Planning The Design Review Committee worked with the A design which is presently before the Commission. approval Of the design with the understandin Applicant to formulate the landscaping The Committee recommended Exhibit p" 9 around the office. The Iilustra*ivhat emphasis be given Lo adequacy C ' 'S not the final Landscaping Plan Staff Site Plan, as shown in 9 r of llsdscapirg adjacent to the o Staff will r Procedure. Also, the Staff su office Burin review the between the exist , ggests that a decorative blockwall checking ` of the storage arIng Motherig Plant and the < )f the wail wi77 area a Proposed office to Prodded approved with the Land�scapePlan, screen the view 'as apr,;-''v,,,; =he Conceptual molding Plant. The final design - P Grading and Draina The Grading Committee ge Plan. b�u, Development Review No. 81-33 Planning Commission Agenda November 25, 1981 Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the Applicant, is provided for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environ- mental Assessment and has found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with such findings issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: A Notice of Environmental Determination was advertised in the Ty Report newspaper on Novemaber 10, 1981 . To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input, and material relative to this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings of Staff, adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. .,Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL:CJ:jr Y_. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Natural Features Map l` Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan. a' Exhibit "C" - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Elevations Exhibit "E" - Floor Plan Part I, Initial Study Resolution i 7 , 11 i f -- I r�jFru sT10EEr f� 1 ; �• in t+ I i V51 I .. C// w I I (V6cwMT LwNp) NIT 'J t.nrM_./� iw i� f I I f L,4Gt .n I( JIf ,v h� ._.— ..---".-_' f'-..._ Cyf �..-:;Cni:ice.7 — - --1•_'�—__i BEET j '-- CITY .+C O41Tp`Lta (Vn.twT LIZ /'uw I�I1,YtLY 9twl�o�' / LwNv 1 e i y3_ .wr, • Vicinity map NORTH CITY OF iTE l: RANCHO CI-TCAN10.xL CA - PLANNING DP✓IsiaN T1T�L' di _r �` ,r • �,V•ViIVY•Y LMYOJ 1 i 1 4 S V jJl}y�� b �qG I1 1� a• � a. ! �S�ia. Dc < ------------------ 1El 1 F 5: p do v xb � NORTH CITY OF ,TF.,,: RANCHO CUCAMO\'GA TITLE= PLANNING DIVISION EXIIJBIT- _SCALE: M-rs55 hbe�•InN;2 1 1 II=M. y I •1 M.ouoiu4 .�'v.� �.. r / —Lw�,��,�����d-��i'�gh�lR12H2= J (rJ]4i•�u«l�.".`iwry'�:,ba!l^nr' I::Y' �... � .—CJS.R^.3.wu,un..�.,. v //-may ♦ •.` �.% -u a�w~�^'• it ILLi5Tr0.�Tiv/�TAtp� n w L CITY OF RANCHO CCCA /IG\G3. TITLE: V/E K;. PLANNING DIVISION i, : E.YI 11BIT-_��__ _ SCALE:--9--T-5, Y dq�. •3F2��; ,:;����?"ai 1 �bv/.�dJ'R,�+P•,;� `li,l aid°0•�•4��`a•+ wl_I �y�j;�Y• i.��.. t�;aV;Jio�ou °;e�'�.'p ���• • .q+�i.•gww* �1.�{y uwgxlll .1 / ��MpR gy.iY•• •�ILG.V.M MI•.� `\\ ....ww • a I I� L�a ' � �'�- •tea ' I. .. � � QOj ~ Y U@K V u f✓q.lq. CITY OF ITExI: F is"9-NC.HO CUCA MONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISaO EXHIBIT: 9.D11 �� � •��.� �M `l'L' yl 1. 'll i .I u•n..a1nyGY U r � . •1 i � .L"'i.'1,�I •)�WITI.WL �'1!) h� NO:QR(�1 ( �,.� a ; $.a+.. '. .. II� \._ems 11�. ti fr�4i•...ry. _+�... .�y.Wce,Ty•r ' I) `, • � tl••A ..we�Mrj,"Y ..Gl. :N N:•,b•_ ./=yb• l: • `v •� 1 }:3.. L AO 1• CITY Ca, _ R.� NCHO CUC.AjvjO.LN'uti TITLE: �LlaG1C P a! ! PLANNING DIVISIGN E,YIi16IT�_ ,•� •, SCALE: I A!. I: �.f 'r. CITY OF %01CHO CUC:+PIONCA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $@0,00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial St'ady. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before tinc public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Corr,:nittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project wfll have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. AiFTCE BUILDING.FOR POLY PLASTICS PRODUCTS, PROJECT TITLE: A BROOKS PRODUCTS, INC. COMPANY APPLICANT 'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: BROOKS PRODUCTS, INC. 10141 OLNEY STREET, EL MONTE, CA 91734 (213) 443-3019 P.O. hnx NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONY: OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERTING THIS PROJECT: R. M. VAUGriA;.:, E20 SOUTT 11 GRaidu AVENUE, SANTA ANA, CA 92705((714 58-901 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. ) 10220 FOURTH _STREET, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA _ MAP 5239 , PARCEL 2 NO. 0210371-01-0-000 , LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY .FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: BUILDING PERMITS, CITY OF RANCIiO CUCAMONGA BUILDING DEPT r NO OTIiERS REQUIRED. .1 , PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: CONSTRUCT NEW FREE STANDING SINGLE—STORY OFFICE BUILDING. 2 ,250 SQUARE FEET — FRAME. & STUCCO CONSTRUCTION. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE. rOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED L'JII,DITdGS, IF ANY: PROJECT AREA_ — APPROXIMATELY 3 ACRES — SQUARE FOOTAGE EXISTING BUILDING.— 19 ,800, SQUARE e: FOOTAGE PROPOSED BUILDING-2,250 SQUARE FEET. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRON14ENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE ¢; OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE, (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) : 19PO , pRHY _ GENTLE SLOPE GENERALLY NORTH TO SOUTH �i PLANTS — NONE OF CONSEQUENCE. ANIMAT.S - NONE_ - T. NO CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS.. 1, SURROUNDING PROPERTY — INDUSTRIAL PARK. ?r G 'P J Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? }t NO AOL I' WILL TITS PnoyCT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial changt- in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change- in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)! X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any - r_isting trees? Iiow many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units.. complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial avaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief_ I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Committee. � : �! `��� Signature Date �� — % l , , Title RESIDENTIAL CD"STRUCTION . is The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to ai-d in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. "j Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No . : Specific Location of Project: — PHASE I PHASE 2 PR).jE 3 PIiksr 4 TOTAL ws - - - 1. N=iber of single fanily units: ' v . Nu-her of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to + be-cir. construction: Earliest late of and L of Tentative s5. Bedrooms Price Rance f r< ii T _ 4 RESOLUTION NG. A RESOLUTION OF 'SHE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 81-33 LOCATED AT 10220 FOURTH STREET IN THE INDUSTRRIAL PARK ZONE WHEREAS, on the 1st day of October, 1981, a complete application was filed by C. & I. Construction Co. , Inc. for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of November, 1981, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and, 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and, 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project w0l not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declara t;on i.s issued on November 25, 1981. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 81-33 is approved suhject to th�Towing conditions and attached standard conditions: 1. The proposed parking stalls behind the office building shall be 60 degree angle parking and the existing chain link, fence shall be relocated to the west side of these stalls. Resolution e on No. Page 2 2. A six-foot decorative block wall shall be provided between the existing molding plant and the proposed office. The design of the wall shall be submitted with the final landscape plans subject to Planning Division review and ap proval . 3. The existing trailers shall be removed from the parcel when occupancy of the office building is granted. Provisions for their removal shall be submitted to the Planning Division before occupan- cy. 4. The circulation aisle around the existing molding plant shall be cleared of all obstacles on all sides ti before issuance of building permits, and shall be maintained clear and free at all times. APPROVED AND ADOPTED TH1� 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PAMCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary o t e P anm ng Commission 1'. I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the .Planning Commission of the "ity of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of November, 1981, by the following vote-to-wit: e AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11b, S;L D' fi p v•, v W ` V� V VO VViNO O�^Y C b 4i q •� r. a q Y _ N a C ^ J A L r L A Y N ON C NV f•C_ ^ L O u0 q d OWNnA �E uVn G •„i T^ Y LG ' y ` T� ._ M C � �•� pd � 4 dJ OC 4 u `Ar' q LO SS •gut rn9000n / •L ^ N 6y 9 < a � Lr"'4 SOV _y 4 4' N r4i yN4` CNT �u fi. AV - _ dq N « V •� C N w� UN n � ^ A qNn� '� q 10.Q^YL �� N •�n ^aY. N •� ' N O u 'O N J a .^ q L N V ` O V arr � - Nn OTr T4 q GuOa y(I Y ^ At� L V u u_ ua NY Yr a YSdC (J Mr ^64Na d O W6 9tO Cn N " � 4 r9V ` ra M Sl L ^ V V A C � F L }.u V' Or L" C P q« •. r' mN uU �^ 9 T 21 aV'4 90 M� O�/L r' }O OTrJ OOO CV3 LCi m > « yl I' IrN .7. w_9 ti S N •l^p � V .O. � O L d N N�u b A A V ✓ W! b 4.N��.^I�. u m ti. ,r- L y LV C N T y T LT N W��VLT � q ^ C' .tea V `Y ^ r0 `'. r� 0 •q-V C^ lU N NY � n{q ry dLL VL .V- U�^ Y�' 9LL NC d N C Y«UGOy q•Ga J)I 2 z > q•^ q t• a a i : 4._ UCO C Vu Y N�o y' 0.� OiV O O.n ^ Ou F^ � � C.- O� N« C9 py �^ r t CCV y i N G 9 A 9•^ L J V S a O L V a d q 'L '� N V Y Y u q L'tJ !r U U V C. G ' q - N v - on ^ N4 mG ^ c 4LJ Y vj V � > d VO GCVM �n Cd 0.�. rOp' 'n+ COr9 A YC .. r vc `' m✓=i:o V L y �.Y Y' v «N � ... ata m ^S V ^ NVtiC 'r'u� 'VV .n0 NU L� NYq NUYV p .V• n 64 Vld 6q vr0 N 4 � WrLf Y. T, �4A. �r«gaN LO Y J �O1v iCLaLV yl I I I I I 1 N ^t lYl NI 4 .-•11 N l [O y„ OO 01. 1 Y i_ 6 aV L u a V c d V r N L Cy a N } O C A G 1J O ^ 1 «Y p` a Y Ob 69^ LS G c N V d `- }r^ L 4 R C q O n G O E rqn '= 5� JN u p LR P T ,`CaYC d q O a y ,^�nl6 qW.� C pLI L/) i „ L] }y�W tya (y C 6RN dd OC pNO aC NO �� dP u�'^ OrP 06 C_r O NO ' Tu "•N VT d S • LV9 qia _Cn 910 q gaii ���' T� r/r d �c Nc �n '^.T. yYA� ro -co .J c- �v � 9� 6 •=.`_ 1 W Y_ � � '^ ,O^ C d.V_ �V 'p � Nd nN 'n CUC d u^ uOr9d O 4•p�1 • M ~ q S. C6 Y6 Y'� Nu ^VOn AMC yV >� LV' EG« d M Nu O C VLi u C VIE O A O qS VY ^1 O q L yA N OIE W L6«y jY' uu a Y M q 4 ' 6 'r 'Lv' ^V L.- N q O. ^ vOi 1 �.^`p •�^ q d C Yr _ �V. G V A T u '��' p � O V' C •^ d q N Y d d L L V f O L O Y U 9 L• {ten `J « CJ ^�P' AL,yn_YPd � nNtiu �`uClnppL rrA V^PL uO„,^0W5 GOV L v 0 9 Y 00 Y ad uC •6L.^�JCrL�u{d OAT.�Vlr z!G rqfyrj NCN �nC 6O d p N u Y q Sr po a O a �rLnw '� w �.` - u pT r^pA NNn O�NJ 4C0 d2� O� q�yYy/ AAV On + vY 9 (L W 5[r2 9Yq'J 1! Y 1..I Y Ln tl^ C rL,�. SY LJ]Y VL ^ qL Y ^ NY CCL uC'=N F_ d .N•Lu d C jy` •arrOV ONO dq OU 6pI OLY L L O1 N r� V1N O N� SAL `O•YY ILK HSN �4 Gr4 `LL yp UN 9Y�� `„ y� pVl Y .. 'dl' 1,,, LL Y u 1-.V• 4 U J 4 O M 6 H Y ` y � M W �� O \N1 \(J7I� � 4f rO \1'�y11 \!M•I� \•O/II� O � ti L q6 V p 6 ppZ Y •., N C J yQ',V N 1 � � .i �� 1 � •,� r r.. � i� r 1 �I I .A 1 � !. ..b 1 �Sn � �.'� d .,'.� •' •� f ��• 'i� i' it4 , t, � �,,�iS,i,i�'i�.i. ; '1 .(I J i.Yrry�< ...i �?'lei yn i, . il` ��� ,1. ,.' gut 'i.:,:. r '�r �j1�Lln�14r� 'r, 11 7.`r I , 'rr� 5 1 �'•; r�,,1 Iv!nli1;�,.�y ;�, ��� v 11 � , .,i. 1 �F, 1 r r :I G,YI � i >; �#T�i:;��� ,•: �;,�� 1 •, ;, 11 s's`r, ;. 7 ti ,, � ''; is •,, r Yr.rtn)�• .tic �,� / .,. r .,. 1iC l h'�. 1t4Lr �i Nr �'. I '�1; . .w41�'} Y.y' ., i�YVll._ . ( 1 '.. F,r i �;r. +(�+ 4 n `lb ,>�1 , � I. ���s� �` t1;' I, � �j.�, ' 45:``;1'�'"'fir i 1.1L .':I.. }� �{:.i!ia. Ali,: ,� �, Y. '{Ifi:... �Sr,' I rN: '.��d tiN Gf�d :,. 1�.�1i'� if.'. r 1•.A,. ^���',. � .. <;• 1 d ����� � O: �� !r , t�"; ,y > ���' ; i' . ��s' ` �,k��'c Ir ;•'y� rll , . , I� �I�+ a ,� ���;, rt y ' ,k n �i rn I ,•.: sd 11 � ,.Iv 1 �kl, 7 �`�5` 1 AAr: J�rni t i .d �1 6I '��'1ti�fr` ,.,,� '�k I,.i r,. ,.;i , � +'r• L �rt�i`r' � e j: 4 1. I J;• 1'rl4 � I 1 �• r� �' I l! (r.�pLl� I r l: .. ^�(1 •/�/f} `�� ICI 5 {t /1 1, 1 My .FI '•1y f r .. ,nt• i�y,n i 1 1 F Y' .;.�` ;Inj{rrn�. f 1r ri'i 1`r y' n �.. ,..r. . ., ' I d X�k�r'. , � . . 1 '. .. G 11 .G' N A - d N • P M y CO C N n L T d •a V C C d V,N r O 4 .. 4 N q • X � N G _ 1 N L pLrr d VP YUY 4NL ✓�. tUY r •�i v { LV 9Y O p y' L ro— L Y. Y.L V Play L O yAV b fl O•� � O V� .. JC L9 u n I p� W L N q< 9, ^ C i . Y w h O C N V F W k• j 9 V ^ O LSO X•.Y Cu'Ly 9p AN001 1- V} y O p OyC E I..- j L q 10.0•VAL qr PiOq u ��NN ✓ O-_ VRN.`r .~ ..✓ O q y.b 1 6 y? d C d6 pl} Y 6.,9Y ��N L^� O v •• N_ LPlf,u Z N'• T N •� ... p i O "O Y{ O"V L u•.p �l j V P C W L L O. OI WY q V [' �I,O.� AYq •0910. JR � V dt0 Q 9 € W w�.q T O L LW V ]•.` V V P L.A. 6•�� .•O YNi�� .C.✓ O^ L � N i O V 1" V N C.' �y0 .• LUF NL •r :. 0 `� O qy C m V [I L L Y V O R N•^.• l Y A d �: V O O r^ N�O L � C q J �v W '^ d d 9 V •p ` L ,^v q\r Ofi C V G' �tl Y• ON 4 NO f.. LL I L•L• „ 6' m� L N ` J pqV UYp p= YV� I WCC �mL Up JOP L vV }w. W OL C J W dq ^ R R X 9 y W^� � d•� V LL y O C R+ •J 0. d W r 0� T_ Q Y qn�y GJ4 O S LG < `O O[nC ^�h V V V ... b� q q O Y ✓. C ' � N � O O U L q T r L t m p .O V r N V ••O• q^ J N W O N l 4 2 p J 0.2 q ` z✓✓ V C � L' C .•- 4•r E 4 f. .NC YC 6R Ydn• y TVL Liu � .n .nLA jYV ^ q4.^ C O .. d ^ .n 4 O 4TC� W•r O ^N C 9P�r •.A, >' VU VV iLL� d„ du �Y } \� V q q 2 Y NOV O!Jl L L wl.-• V O m 0 N W N E u •• O O ' x q ro -v q •L. p V U 'n rT a b f� ML L.•r{ ANIL ' nT� - 6N ^ a w1OC N N < Y }r ^4L0 X N< WQOduC W �� O uuu + L ^•n` :; c wn ' - c cop •r W 1. V['J„� p✓ NV CN Y 4i0 N Otr dY R� q .�Pby � .L_ N IL A Ob0 q L Lry _ q'CN 9V �O dRyY N (J VP V Lm pAq L q NL ' dMgP ^� iu 6RL p LMN wuY y..�p } YP J[ L u� L W V pW d N y N y I N V 60 N 6 d q C u 6 •- N` � j E `V L L q C O N O d L V J •• r-. ` ^ .� L C 9 p i ulr L T✓ q ^ NCA YC 'O� 4.c^ Nu.O i` Cu 6q N L •� I y y •� YVCP nT ^� EIC ON L•W.W PVL T tLPr�� 4-• q �� N L �O V" 'v TCC F ?,mod OjV upci^ O•TG �Lq ,T .Li K = q d O d�N \�V V� Y V Y V o J .• Cr PM' .NO Vn ^P� J �AO aON CLJOL `CF- .....�V- d YL'• S V � yA y L` 0. 9^ J VG-'p> V In OY QVL OV pY p. LLq�n QtO Op •p RT y I L � d,p ' q>� p Oi•q P9 ba1] A J Q Lq 'W q I d I i111 ` L ti r a k. O lV,y V N I:+tl\r V 6 N Q •LY \�V•�,• Q q p V O d U O f.J M V 6 q C O M TT ' ` ��\•� ` I ^I 1 PI Q V G ~I N� �I rl NI 1 d ^ U t d i t V L G � ^ CL �' c V C V � >qw • C O L✓ C p N rOC O �J YV G•K2o 4V • A q N 4 ` F 'J v` L • O O W S y ^ 0 d 9 T C p O N^ ^ q 1 . 0 w q u O � G n u V C•^ tJ V V N W i L Y C L O' O^ Y g9Ns p^CO N6d NEy ^ PVLL • N Op Y. RUT •Ln r�O. 9 VL C r b� C 6� N u✓ ` E oQ�� (p_, � V O 4 O b V rLii .� O y N N P = Y C vA O V � ✓_ F � q Nd� � } 00.<. � rtUO J 9�� ✓O.L dam . _ CNC •� �� .• � � y� 9V L 4e^ �. 6p^ ` � LN� VCLYY' oVr `YbiO Yq.J.V. W �i�q ` PL Jq^ ^L qP = r am N .C �r• d L N q P W M y � V V pyl 4. V r� V(� � C L M•J d 1l d V M L V F r 6 v w L � �W� N q 0 V•-•�b•^ d q+C q q V V U� O_ d L w\`p T V ti V' ..}.N O L V^ 4_ q✓ V V N e' v T.�l• ]qO ' Y 4.. p V P C N r O L J L—N C V [1 fJ NN L Y f$8. d C L\O t o • C C 64 d T w.yl r • W L (pLL VyJp CN> C �V EO �YY pL to O�JC W�NLL O V `.^ VQ yC / • V G W y C�9 N 10 6 C d O O �' u � V L . 0 [Y1UL N W_Yq.Y ViA ^ G .,•. JLC ANLI,W- AV`�LP V i •V- O O•r VfJ.I Q•_ ` � AVd•.O•.NY G9^ 4 ^^ qi VO� V L4'O Lz�V N L4VC ^ VV VO XV 1� d S E L 0.� _ C d V C N f} q u T �V L Y.C V I q\` L V h tA. � ` G�� P N Jw✓ p q •n 0.V d O1 C1 P ' 6 V L Y `I•. V 01V N O•N L�LdIL .• , S P Y N G d '•- .^ 1 ` d _O L = 0 6 T6` � P(' �p � Cd OLD rO•b �C {''O� � w y �_C � L 16 r O�•Nq Cb 'h q OC pU Y•N^ yL, C✓ w•.• C V 4 � d N l LL V 6 C L 1� T j E tl u O 3 n V P•^O CL PNOM p A C d W�rC VV�• N p C N ✓ L 6ro = �EV V' d„•n• M y ` P 9 V _ �1� � 0.N O A T YAJ'^•i .L •-• p L ✓Y d 0• > .V• A ^ K V V L L q VL.V• XNLM�« ^ OEP (aG }• _ OC 0.YA RV V.•• •� V+ l L >V 4u ^ LJ lq NN•n _ O Ca.+C pT C` O S�q O+� pyuTd pMmw 1 4 C Lpy .•. p.. q6 y OCC On vw tj LVJ] R90 L T N �d0 ACO Vqq Au p O �• S YLL ^_ q •r p q ••_ ✓O •� LL C V N'Y}• O aY pVp,, Y, > q NOO•� y CV V pa♦ P_ L OCJ E_N Y.P VZ L� L y^yI G Y.C O V V V V✓ C, V C V Yt L V Y V ✓ _ N L pp t q ✓Ny F-Y > V0." R �CjY YTrLW,.7 61 ��•AY Nd V ET CgR�C .C•1`YN LYAt ^q O•uq l ••..V 6� T �•r�y U... w q G C 0.OI•n •x• rL V V V 6 N uJi i�Y V . 3 V A N N .0 f" �Sl y y q r •� 4 � }N�l N V� tL9 C q ��u d N L G 1. Y� N.0�� o {J+} O .^ O d•. V � L N.. µ N O �• N O Y V C O V� C u.�Or q6 q X 1✓ V CL 46 NL•rV y �L"yLL 04�N W uL tL O. j �� Py q TY gV9n-^V•^9 } QZV YO F RVgV �N U L u V G V [. OV6 C r O YiV f •rR• • CL EP .0 z .•V..� L� LW LC9C GCp tV 9 J^ C fAP o« odw o, Wb m p N i V ydqurdi• NA=^C �.' OJw^ LXV^«•gyp AO� N N�,JE J C RCOO ` L^�O. L��..6•� i.A.�•iG•^ d Vql .}i �� ✓ C Jb • / 6 W V L O N C i V N 6 V N L .Ir.� p,L 1' d v 6• y C C L Y L L i'G^•r L LYAI N r L C 0,Or y L Y�l W y [p� •-• Gn N ` O C C 6 Jq 2C✓MLp VfJ ^�r � Y- LVY � ^ HJgO 6 •r 0Jbp4 CV VtIV N 6tJ QJO y yV WN \D C[ p�L• O\Iy,1 N to •T \II t0 Y .lh�t I 4 U N 1 SI I `� 1 I'. II .. i. 1 r • 1 S41Y, ' 14r 1 y �1, lYl 1 ' Y F• 5 t . .1..' 11 1 �V, n 1 . irl 1 • . . A d s ro W NY- 4 V q L y \r Lw q y OTC Nc V� nC^ T^q qy O --A � = C 9 ��� d N N V•^ m q q V O y L N L r(! N V V D O y rA •n �J`9 y V�O Op \r N C Q V'V^ �> > O y 6 CUO � d OV•nmm V 'O muO C`L Ym •n V L n L r. ^ �/ \'J\i C •Or •..u ! d L L Or M PLC rv^ n W '•9 _ d L\r C \� O L d l!u 4 b m V N N L `'J ^u '-C u L 1. l Cn V 6 q m V 9 � p �O.• L N^ y 'V- W O..u \- ^d m f: � s 9L O N u q fV' qC � u a wC� d d Y b�VC� V IJV LOO rv.VQLu� fT rom d ` .'tart 45 �.u- qn uNu - cr gun i"' Cu � L ✓ J NC 4 A n�Nq C L L•. -JC V >ru YW6 � P^ cNy qy N .^ fy au c a NL qc q uV j " � 4NL^ \O.• N Nd� L uV "A V C m p O ?r- ' q b P� V..- N F iy 6 b• w V � ...- \r�^ C i qCN.-r C pn WLC VJ:uV L �� 1 q L C C L n V P -A w L •O a a 'u N N c w ar o_ L'... wt«y n hr «r v to r \J u m V u L 4: .n Vi o .= a L r c i oNo c ad - W:i«r q 9'. NWu 4n q.d+oy •^y }E V {� y 4p O m6 L � IN •� l nL 0.0 m' C` Wr v 6 ZvVN4 0 ^f_ UwE Wa V CO b`� L>_u L Oi _c VC NV _C = LVL N ` V �C • V NC uyv CC dJ:p 4 L O N W C L N E q V � C O.O NC OG q 9? 96�Iri M. d'^ �u... ULO.- L ryS c�L 9�� EOC iq W q..- •-f` CO2 4 S] '. o. \oJv �Sm �« ''N L. � it.eo i >,t. _l X •-. L V u•u T p 6 WM C O u Lu 6V L W i� 9c 010rv9 �. 4 L' m .qC \r ^N CO C+ VIr C �o� •q � c m •-'no c c\L L N Or y _ rm A u g� ubA L�O.r•r ^'- vLiu 4ru m �O TC N N nY q9 0o {y5 L • LOWd d ur. A•- N c \r m u W c A Od V � L 4 d 7 O \J U ... ` 2 V O A U L \j'�-\ C g C r A+V m r C q 9'Y• 6 W C 9' O O i P N ^ �� � < av a� ; � L rncn. uo 9L vWi•� ` oNdfv L.L. ..`4� �aW � i`_q ELu :° +,r _ 9 ry •° L �0 9 �.d.. " rve u r- �c�V J'N m r\ry. r N t).- n N w •' o L q c 6w. v,n. ¢q V, O N GN WYLi h2 LIW JwL•V qL� =Rr V•-L =OVv 6 LI rP L w .\O.• .Wr � - \-O• v, <V u�\r LLU`um Y 60 d •�• ...• N N N N O - .O •i Z N � Ow`• ` �.)� v �_O ([y�y N ...•.r � Y J C c N d ^ O C O ry C r v w n L ry n C Wn V^ N V_ 7L C VV T� yY u N Wq ((yyL I ti N ,L qL m C OL 6 0 gV G ^O d= V q .- q aL 0• �yCi � V )�l: S TJL Gi �� d PN n � CryL �ru J� dC9 4 Lq^' h f)` ~ T W u 6 ro 9 V O y 0 q\rY .•-.N C •ey V C.[-� L O•_ 6z = G r P L C pr ���' SW 4 qY ... ny � L • � d J MV V' " PN \OL yO CJi •Ni•LG v0 •-.� q ro y V•2 _go c -� 1 O: iy oc W•r .=.'v 9 � �ii n Nm JJ- �c�77 .. y G � N o^ ti - W y qn $n .. .: W�> c u P LcI' aa• auro =nm: N ^' t ,' aZi pS � V I S d« O d �q C O � r•.•'• q A q u^\r ro L V q d^q d V N V i. Y 0 q b_ V u C� ry O C ^L d u c L i C•La G C O L �� � O L O c n C U C �� 6 � O f.J C 9 LrvN do r •rOi6 �� ,'� Wmd CT �m rCW q qV 1- � � � N XI{ rN jY q� 9U N 'L LL y > }• l0. �' d u- OtiN A T� ON CD j � OO NN >, 6q N\15� L i ryOVryC ��u qC Uq y (y; 'rS. V WO is�N N_C „V gaily Cq y L� 9yV Orv0 � 2 �iu9 C~ OY. N •.. d y , � L aJ yC qq u49 id q« � yA LN\I1 ', V� NV rY: N t T O N9N q ti C ua V 6Y G�-q \rC n N >,rvV n O•...'VN C-2'N `g Wd7 •{� � � Y V 6 N ry T O C fD O V u� O W q V d q q Y. a 6 .. > 9 G r_ V C� R V r V d „ y C q C L. }V a u Vµ` O q l u n N C C L •W. [E q N J p ' C � C �~ O_A ONO Vd NOV P. L OlV AM q� win r_O q '-1' •-LV )' �c �• C Vn� 4VY t Lea NL rJA ^Wd \� qLq d.r2r N LPq ' V .• 4 1-i � Llw R' f1' H > u GLO. G�'q 4V� LO PV V >yw ^^ �yVr.. q = �� > HW G10 QON 6N 1�.L.• t .c M M 1I{ V� C ✓U L O�O L� pO iy� ` ro Y.� r m C � N` Tp •� t` LN OP^y A 'p u L C� N ✓ .r3• S V cO `. � C �✓ dr L � VCu��✓N ') •- W a V C u N W N C O � �O q N L y C ._ � L fL CC O SLY CWL ?y 00 ? q V 9 pN SOW ZT nv OHL d � N O r D•.O- N N y d D O P p L V k � l -p(O� >N f Nd JO plY� L ✓V L .=.r vu Nd r UNN O_d�L_D du L^ O •. U' L N ✓ •O. O •� V.�) O u p v� V✓ A LVc ✓ �q� ^^ O uLii LW L L 4LV .•C.� ✓u✓ Z L >21bro TC0 u LO InUV DNA 4D^ V u q O L P ^'C � N� � .•O. L =2 p d J ^ QQ d pAp u• T p + AC NOS L4 CL d d P qp 00 YL JP O C•�DWPfILV L �O J✓N C u O-y 6P v p � WA ~ a JaNC N Ll^FNNNr L: A u c PLC b _. 2 ' .o. f' P' a = m a— ro g QN .✓.'•a6N S0 P Sv N i 'O fi GwL .'•Y•' NC Pt L Nuai ✓ > ud C C LN✓LL �`^ � G Ly^. W A V ✓ � Vt . ON V V •• N AY=0. iW u P NU WL u' ^ N EV•� uL` 6 pl � W O OUp O✓O W C l r G rr�^ V 1WrO0 ��� l0 OW N � b 4C6L �L[(y� d AD � LOOYUC✓rPjr V VE 1 = Y N C ?J L l V C C `E✓V ti L n P O I� qCp ww0 4Oy A^ �. d b q BAN `Wt1 P �✓ I ✓ A.lVI�O.44✓ V6 ytlLN OdGI V O s � O ✓ ...6 .•N.L� r L N ^ .p V•^ N NDq .. w N ^ L.�c [, 94') gLr 6 aYIC N FO.gC 6V^q v. ^^ _.. �A i 5'.r v a�✓ N� 1 _ a.i�v.o Nw cv a, m Jr c •�'cv i Q c✓ ^ : i u�'o c cr. c .N.' __ o�cN _ i) V r� V ✓ p y I.I .Orr Fu h�� cv >. � N� yi 4 yV ^�+ VO i NtLiVy pLu •'O JYOr NO. L.: NLDL Thu 4 42D 46oa0 Lo 4 CJ6 4 6 �C� Ni+r p0 CY .Vi✓._ V S^ Ny O. l i l i a W N c c 0 q L i` .q+ 'i '� u •ON aic✓ ( D v 2 urL •^.L.A c N a e o N y N n P L 6•� c m..v 9r P✓ FNd A� ^ N✓Y Nu r C Ca r �✓ O✓ O=yG rN� AV N Lu. CCy 4 6V' L6L O.•. Y NL�¢OL dUy « u S b+O �_ U 9 pCI p•� p � bFl C C+ NV FNV uP NU VAF•O. ^ O � PC pD .Y qV L9 y •� _ C A O 4L C tpN ^ LLV �L)' L6 b dro O d yJOi N [�� •fC n�(p] 4, rLn VCq O N y L 9..C. N� v O Y ✓ L W D�' L d N Y d T. A V N > N d 6 b� L O ✓ A uii 4 - a i r✓y V> i L yP ✓$ L V N P O L G✓ 1'Jr�+�' P✓ N ` C P• O M.^ LVO dW � V I[✓._ dO Y Y. ^ � pC V C✓ ^� y OL W �^ P D N u �u�.U. D o �v i P O OrnL. a o a i.� F��T L N D✓ r o cr � "' ac L✓�• N N ..A.c_BiP ANY. vw � W FDy c ^ L .L.j �j L L� uA_p ✓ rq�W p g4 PLO N ipV Jh W.•. ^ 6 V L V V •-.C •L''�lI ® L G 4.v�� Iy L L l U �O N T r U 40.r•O Y u N •De T n J q � Ld M ✓ L L A O✓N F4� r N ✓P O P L✓d.r^ N G... Q FO �✓ �LOrvC ^� � pLur✓O6a� OC p� aLVW~pC� C� PVV pdj "•D 4.r. L O g O T.O✓ N M L Y� N pC d N N +N LN✓V' Cu L_r rrai 6� CWC V6 qp ...AW. M N /i pF Or W� N ✓>) ✓bC^ ` � N (�- T _` AN N^ Yp O✓C__ V r. Nu NL _D 'OO aJ u N +d q ✓u Vdp✓w ND ^O✓ (bV/ a •.L. A dp ]� uY PV0.id C{ m � ^ 09 p F ✓✓ ^� PL yO.NL AV PgNV. N> p . �4+pC OCR . P' b V h O.d y N N y C 6 0 ` it G} ^�` N O p d W N V u L V... • L p� C A W" D =, ✓INVLLJILO • Y.6T0 P Dl O9L�Lrop Na A0A N.i. L Dqq✓ L r' > Y G S F L L A C u 6✓ O N N (jO'�q^ L ^ N L✓ A N N p O P L CLro N d N✓ 6ODN T_N DC VNpFn GiD f[ Nam^ p YD N�•-L� C�' dCD •q� . ✓ -J N V L a L�-p' Ti ^ jiN✓� C Cb^ V drA NC. d uOR^ w �W L ^O Va r GN �VeO gpvyW��^ .C^ L ySP ` L •- LL .Vr•� NFL 'Oi - > OV uyi0 LLL✓[LyL ✓'CO WP ..L.A �✓ •L'�OON N• Cpy T V9a+ N ••• NML N9yO .Ci•CVy� yA' uP q� AS+ OI > qCdL� u ^C ad TADY.� p- Gi"• 3V Cd did ICCLY .NY yM E T V M rpy O l P N p O y L u✓D d W N 9 O L O A 4 O^G W ✓ O••O. C N C C 6G N4. ll._pp.� q gT NCC TO p CW L +• ✓ ay yyg � TO PPy .._ „V. uCPN yyA oV' dN V -V T^ 2 O q C C O^C L C Pj q C yry n C 4 PL L J VC. b✓ • ✓p V}✓ F W^ N u d ✓~ 61` y b IW!p R C O L C.^ p q_ L L N C a 1N0 ^ ^ dLL 6pg j VM F✓ p p ULr W ON d L�� V ^�^^L� >USV.' 40 T✓ V� y pO p k G ^Y AC^qq `J C•� O✓ E i L 6D wyiUP✓✓O VrAV < P 4v 6P6NNgC' V >' ^�OG ti..c. \ I l••- OC 6 Cis.' u a�sie®e�e nl1 M C rr,�YY'��!' L N A 4 d Or y r•N• C ` O T O Lr V N „ Fy n q O • V O D C n p> d q P J a n � N ✓�- L L CrO L'9 N O V N•L•' 4 P V_ L O J 6 y N G O A 4 L GV•'r d WrP u•4. a n�yY rC LVL ✓ '• y O W t d 1 C `r V 'w 0 O�>.L u.. = p « W w• '^ (y O 4 � n� � Gu O.O. V QWC y`y OrOLPb Tfn iN m_ o H « �' � O V Oy n OS L PA NYW N Ur N.� Tbq WLUAb u0 N P H l� C � y NyG� b y d Wn O• i ✓ w9i bVl uV NJ V� V ?.Y•" •'w «« Lr (V. L C 9 d C .L^'L L^•. P � N yOrOGA a' Ny O « _ � PC + bP q `1' � pp 9 knd d NCM WNWPrI LC N "" 92v L r•'q IPL L Vim 4P L�O:�� DNa �✓ O^ E C yL p V Vyrn v A V O W A P T L Y N W N N ^ 9 y C u vry u O•r ✓ G Cr >� L=Jl V✓ u L � A 9E L A« >y T C • 9 n ..C. 6 G C N y W p N N 4 F N O F_. ..•Y �.G V A F L d > Y O P _ {- O Y' O P v n n 2 _ ^_ F V y N W� � P.•d. w V n V V y f'Y.•G. W V L. v.� O 4 O� _C 7 W G N N eIN wn Wn N�L N Amp NVC ✓r'I �jU GL L �� VnWVM NI Lq O •IV« �LI A p� L uu r V V C L.rw L'�✓ Uq � Au O NdW 4 � Y L VIm AC 6A •^i� dY� r �4� pNy [yI qA V6�yLGI Ow.• q N� C O GG ` ♦4W r.. OqV AV C Loo nq^q W q4 rLirNC N ✓' O «0; 6N LYI NCY dNONO•CI W 4W O OV� ; P G 9 n A. V of 9 OrmC ^.•q. L« nNL N �urrA• AC'_'Y n>O YLNYYP y dN 1.1 Am _ N9L > t G O C d O ,.•_ W V V L pr {L P+ L IL• y U W � 4rU Q0 N� nN .^urn M A �N B =0 Ay11uN +p Sl LyOWLrr T Q ^ W ' ^ L C wO V9CP V' L9 A_r� w0- NOrgir rWfr �+ ' Oy q✓r T• mLGdnAI H q rwC •q. y } Crq^q pV9rw L6 t! Uu Lf O Y^ N nV9 + „.. L^ � w0- Nrp.O� V �= Nq Q 4 Pl> rF NO ^ s' VrN uyi ^L N >L N =0N ^VIN NOL (•^ C L V G7 4 O .. W P C P V g C N_ A n N A W M V..r > V N O� Q V L U••�i u n Y. q r ^^� W„4 V Y q y N n T� V+ O b Q of O al r0 >r A L L 6 V pr r•. V 6 N 4 A 1�p w Q q a y N 'QOr` r9y y L ^r•` V L d — \'J.'1{ . \\\IJ.f11 'O W F S O CIO C]N l0J 6 q ¢C•V d V d ML O wq Cy � >• BOG OWN > YW •-. nGd J_ C O b•m A M n AWN G � Tay 2 Vm+ LLri+ Nr- y Y^ � G Ln A 1- C _ O�y� 'N n W • ]� P V 'J Y. N� a• N 9 •: L V A O V ✓ O d«C �^ N V L O d V� O ..C. V. L P <J N _N l Vr�n q N O d �' L N M A u w 4 A W+ 1 i y y 6 6 4 r� w . • O V .9 L P G N P C O b . r W A V`n L_ L 9 C N O Y d L C.) .•.u E LLI y✓O O N ^rCo m ^ P C O L Y•..LN'S'IOOV ` 2>1C_ N r{1CLV W =V+ =VO JC•=. NW AL^A v V ^� �y qV ray Wq ^ wC nWLN (yN9U W pdV L rVV~4 «q L Y� c%W$r� E .Wr.i/« d{V ✓aNL � �'Wi '^ o vr-�. Pr. WgML N > o'n v_ L INit^✓^ quwu� =90 � ��'.-q � o._« o�:: iu>.�� � rp4 ` « W� a N a_ qOd«29 :5 cL[LpoY ur=i� AP OY > pNI j_O rO =W0. WWEAV VL L-`4 yC C V'� LOr I..p• LayCNYy`VC4 V' yO.0 }Y 66 V 9.yV `V FV Cy W�C CU YI YW. O L uL 4� =9 'O � y. YV l Ntz N O •LL„2 ..I wy.. d GI P y A q V^_ d O ^ YgyyMOnYArrr + A� � Y^y a 6w4 JJJ�iC gw�L`W • A[WVP C L ^ F w •Lr-r� L_ „�� � N6 q✓Cry J V9r• 49 OV �` d L4UC _� yIV Orr .2 W� ` fV d fl 6 F A q Y+ r V✓ d q+YJ � q y t yC rr.' O O J+ ) y G V O Z d OFr L¢V LW P[OP npY �^� Y Vy[y GN qVW `4Vr4 2] ..L. Or... PN Y•✓ y1q �Owr9V TR'^r OGB � NLVy V �Cm OL • yF PWn Or y4 T d„ 9 V N 0 9 O+ L fJ P a V rr•!^= L, C V C �L V Y Y ^ .bw G O G . Lu W N Or... dY WOrA4 + 7 > VN r0 C >4uOmNCU+ 9' Nry ry u4pP JC VOq GM LW G��L CrO •T• d_+ TIZ,9 CL' PV 9M Q✓O C V C L r' � l G 6 q 96ar•-•C �V.n ApVq yL6+ y6b ^ % 4V GN d G nA oY.„-,t .c .-. LpG «uWPn � Lo a�i.•�i .^ bC.• .. Ny w .r :•r E� d'w Mc r• E y y^ K N l u M✓ ^O F. P C U Y L 9 4 L q p—V r A d+ry M L Y 9 b 7 >V + Lpp iN' C'S�� GO=d SnC' Cl S•.q CO+ OO N1r6 >C 9� O u q0 • Eu `' O C�dd L L yy CL' y, L•q d L L O s V C+`C OCT q9 adr. t�p q90 ir�aN q ^ OE � V•^ V4 (yV C L 9 O Nu� q�✓ 6 C .Ga«N u✓ C V' G✓u U yO y N O L G N O .b .r G • Y. O W >q W O Oj^ L .�• N rC p d W _ C` .•. �_ O Y lJ✓Y O y Cr V rO G d q n_ «C ^y ` L «' _ eLI m .- _N y >IC yr ^✓ N.O..4. 'LL r,Q� + A y 9 r• LLr q` rrr „ q = C n.v,E ppC a� Z tVTT LNV NA P i •^9 Wq PC L.0 'w0' d C QI ~ N C C V d C N O W m n N ^q n V q LQ n�4�r N n C ..Yuu N 4 O�Aq 9�r r.ur0 pp CLO9NgC LO wG `�a ML^ 1��• u^O/� w4r r4ir•r VI�+ nnVN Lpa p _ l+ OV pW�C C q 6 d „ Er p q 6q W A � 4 y [[�� AA d4u qyp^ N N�t>f2 V n�'w '�' a.n ^4+ n M¢Lir Or rV `u G� W V� VL PL Ole NC Od � C gOOd Lrr^ L���rO. L���at y 09Y' u �C .•G• P ..C• n r L r.y: d >.W ppII LNCC LWii 4 d�^ L 'O^ AnL wV W•�d ON YrrV 4 y�}{ rAAF «= qp 6 g E U V•i L p L ,Lw y1 O 6 W 6 >Vdp ny 9LV N [JV Q > V YV WI.01 WJ /} • I I Q V N 1 /I I � ~� WI PI u ^� NI ^� 4 m 9 M g �' V y? L' C O ✓N L 4 p L L L W W¢ � b� SO b J .�. �w C � V O q V N M � V f, u u � 9 L 4 G' C y [3 •� d y N O k q •w N 9 n. W i. � M .Lr.✓ A ¢T ~ V� q' P O ✓ L V y ^N O r P I � a„ V A t�4 Y V �c _✓ d Y o N u 9 d C b ,O C .n O •� C V n V f LWL C 1. mf... rp G L A V c p W W O T k _O ni✓ ` W ^ mLW }V n 'L .9 u 9^ Pr bC � O CG c �✓fi ✓ c W qoe ._... °'^, o �a cb .�� c.W. �'t ` G ,D^ ¢[ N nb Oq... NC <� OW 2J ...(� u✓ mJw.o-. Wi' =.W. uN VL y qV� � O LL y1 ✓ ` V E C L 4 O b� W r 6 L W V O C V �� nC q � O V9 CWO yu CO yd pV EG.L uA f_ � N✓ .w O a q V.. � L U m q � V N ✓• G« N UI V q N A W V q y•-. u W L rC.O V •-.u. v W q N l L W V D P v u W O W\. N ^ a` V .-. L u u � V N a NN W¢ q bW L• LO D p n« W1.Ai Cb L ✓IlN O� N F^ r0 r O' «� VL >.Li ~ w oW oib NLW, u kr p`I �C nu ou nV Wm N Ls4 nu 4-pi ab W W i �� i✓pu iy � cc oa � c �% In LO. .o Y `.r �°1 oc W' .r`a.. at•$ ?q LDc� °' � } "T✓e cu NL .` Ile `$ � ".^ Li. P �o _aa c of ii.n .`'y o✓ u� G ^`. bi.� mu c u cp 1q�V �. �a �k �q ur(R� Es. O b J W.0 9 6lN �� NP Ol Nb qL •-. .•✓ NV aV y= ^A 9.w ��N N.w H` W C V.n w m V~ L. G 9 O. ..V }.� ✓ d r q„ �AOy V Y~ u o7n V1� 6L NO Wyo\ CC W� •=u v✓_ .LY LN nIW Ty u PnL 9R r0 V hY/.i 9Vq V 4C L L .jW L .�^ qu q NC tN WF WL� N ^ qA W L..C. O it ✓d p� NLN ^u OO q wP VJ Ln pp��.rW W✓^Lu. ¢ .� W ¢9C i.ViL Nb W9 v1 Ow � Y W � �r �P ur CE ^ W OL SO Y b C �. � bOW 90D dL 1Ly WN•... y 4V L ?�W vl. O^ L O-M O S6 VV q✓ L'^L' Lu uy. u¢ C V gib` > W V V 40 1-9 F-.r✓ RG.n � .Ji. Jk NN Z� HNW L„a o✓ .wu i Nr ;q O. •-•i N o. 1 6 S n O 7 G-•O-. Y ® J !N Q- C d L w � y LV ✓W G V 9 G a « '.� D y- M L � O U�9 q .-..Ti ✓Y y. R V LN WW OJ TM.Q 6„ 7 Nd5 w_ wY V W V W a q^ u P G V„ � ,N F 1pp1yy L A C^✓ C N V V � O V C L p�.iY qP q rpV V ^ V- CN qr^qq� nQ O-••✓C OLIM w d C n lCT -•C-.�90 .VW� •dqQ p' E C4 pu v Q_ LaL WO¢% Vd N nCPV JE�YW «u CIL LV•..0 `Od qr LV yu L'N V .T LEIy C1 p/.LryC�.� q W F. W Ou O'LLO ti a� Ga ��u O� r O �rL WLLq qL L �L•✓W q _NML O .V^a0. 9~ V6 rL YVNUL, qL' Cy v1 ` JcRO JpAO yWJP « WW .a YC r`7' yd L y q .0 O. =Y �� r � \ 4 N C V W L C K i• 1 � u u .0. • L�rYO, .LO.�1•. N o �« N i ��L Y O 40^. J C.J •t••a G V c o « G V u o Ly n Ly.-. ^% � O } C LCI ro 6 Mr V W L ¢C a.-- 9ICM � ^� N90Vb vL0 V-.V. .mob Y". yC� N� `M1` « ?C V✓4 9„OyT LTL T q E.r QUV ••• CC �.•V.Y LVp 1'� aP ! V•-. C� P O-4 d J{ CM pN .CS O•u0 WV 0 V «0 b l•q 4C 01q 6o0 NC^ r GQ p9 YLL Vu_Y. qVL ¢aC q P VJ 9 Wv L M N L Cb V W ^'n 6 L W Y F m Ti .Ni• C L. V A ¢ibi•GV O Oi q W ¢� 4 W V LL G P9 L c T +pO/ CO T+ 4✓ 6gYO dC .e 1Y. C b�C gw.Jr� NL 9VnE NV PY{', � A.� Ju N D L u W L n u ) U C O ¢V' C i F C C L V .C• L •L..ti P W V V M N q C d q G W Vc+V •F i nL C AW wy pJ C}!�aL)Y >OD �b VO L� ^ML N •,• •a �'wNb6+L Pli{ 06 C� Oum„C � ¢O�Ly L•G C9 V� YJ. JN O � � .. q >1�QyLr >WNL } ^W�� TL rl YgNtu ✓fib P } Y« bW P Cat �nC �N AV21~ W N¢ .. .•.�q .I qO .W.rN ^� CN (yC� �qA � O O9 CF 6 «1'lC ���Lti NV pW WP uN CA Oy N 1, � rYp �L d L u. CY N.W. V1J N _W C AI-- YWVC LW FCq^ yV(V .0 64 4C qFW aV C� L -w E� p ypCQ v ^r S. dUV C WuuN �y N� ('bCb WF L Set 6L Y^ L• LN+ u71k�q LWL. N ^ iN +N- qN^ b A A m T 1. b O N 10 A N � w Nl M e 6 9 W � ^uY Lc VO ' L YN, o" �•--.0 L+� N b C u ..N. 5 �Y E�3 V.^0ny A L O � N 6 O [I 1Ad•y � 0Y- V qa N y u V N p q W v _ Q C y'S^- FqW(y L .L• V CSN y0• ryb W.�M Ju 6u L O L d J u V 4 V 9 L O C u C d _ V N q O u � C,Eb Vg 4 J COaVy N[i c .•V. L > Y p N c d N L W N r L 0 0 ONO n V C d L C lql V 0 u p V C 4 L L `;s NVL6 - dC TT T V1 L� [' c 4W u O A � Ov ANWY t N V O A 4i E A O V L 9 ry O V V V iJ J c r V W +6 i t 6uC• C OV 09Yq yL NJ[LA W�Y-W V �O �t0 yq �NVG L L.N�C OiL 4 u gLTC V .. O O'^ 9 iC a. PVL qW NO. I OVLU YOV C O uu• OL NY 9Jfnd •.. 9CrN �` 9CL MO > E A -� OV•� O L� AOT9 Ll q0 1. Cp� pCCp�� W d A W W y 11�. qS FNmV � Nf � 4 VVOIVIO 4Un6 Vd CY LU1CN yL` y CC1J� L N^O C i d dddddb`IIIII u 4 07 U O O U A V D O b V .O+n+ •� 4 n Y' c W u PLAY ECJ L F �� t I I �[ WW L 6 .OvE J W Vb C �W C N q Ulu ' 2lW OO. b 6 4gYq W4 66 6.J .p 6� 1L -•C� • T 1 1 V NI �i RI �) bI ^I (�1 -1 tf� CLARK & TRKVITHICK A 1K0Ir0l110NAL 00"MRAT"N LAW YERs DONALD P.CLARK HOO WIL'3NIRC BOULEVARD-sU1TE 700 Wr5LEY 0.LA FEVER RONALD L.TRrVITNICK Or COUNYRL JAMES E.NOCORMIC% U1 LOS ANGELES,AUFORN IA 000M DOUGLAS E.NOW 'SON (213) 020-0700 ALEXANDER C.MCGILVRAT.JR. PNILIP W.DARTENETTI T November 19, 1981 IN REPLY PLEA3E REFER TO: DOLORCS COROCLL STEPHEN ".TURNER 1.4150-003 Mr. Jack Lam Secretary of the Planning Commission P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Proposed Amendment to Industrial Specific Plan re rail spur and landscaped setback along the extension of Seventh Street Dear Mr. Lam: We believe you are aware that Inland Container Corporation ("Inland") has an option to acquire Lot 1 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 7088. This firm is representing Inland in connection with the option and the possible acquisition of Lot 1 and has been authorized to deliver this letter to yr 't. Please be advised that Inland is aware of the recommendation made by the Executive Committee of the Industrial League of Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce at its meeting held on October 29, 1981 with respect to the amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan to accommodate a rail spur parallel to the proposed extension of Seventh Street in Subarea 15 of the Industrial Zone C of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The recommendation was that there would be 20 feet of landscaping between the rail spur and the Seventh Street curb (five feet within the Seventh Street right-of-way, 15 feet between the right_-of-way and the rail) . Inland has previously expressed its views to members of the City' s Planning staff and of the Executive Committee of the Industrial League to the effect that it woul.i p:.efer no landscaped. setback. However, in view of the apparent firmness of position taken by the Executive Committee and its commitment to the existence of a landscaped :setback in a heavy-industrial area, Inland will have no Mr. Jack Lam November 19, 1981 Page Two objection to a landscaped setback no wider than that recom- mended by the Executive Committee. Please note that Inland is concerned about the type and extent of 'landscaping to be required by the City within the setback area and the expense to install and maintain any significant amount of landscaping. i Very truly yours, (17 S E. MoCORMICK III JEM:iom cc: Dr. John X. Vaughan Roger wricson, Esq. I4r. Theodore Zwicker Mr. Joseph N. DiIorio r r r,• i' y . 5 t. ,Jj•. CL&RX & TRZZVITHICH � w Fworconrouwl.coNrowwroN LAWYERS DONALO P.CLARK 000 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD,SUITE 700 WESLEY O LA FEVER RONALD L.TRCVITHICK Or COUNSEL JAMES C.MCCORMICK = LOB AN0CLC5,GUFORNIA 00017 DOUGLAS C.MORRIAON (213) 020-5700 ALEKANOCR C.MrOILVRAT,JR. PNILIF W.LIARTENCTTI 0040RCR CORDCLL Wovember 19, 1981 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO: ETCPI' N N.TURNCP 14150-003 Mr. Jack Lam Secretary of the Planning Commission P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Proposed Amendment to Industrial Specific Plan re rail spur and landscaped setback along the extension of Seventh Street Dear Mr. Lam: we believe you are aware that Inland Container Corporation ("Inland") has an option to acquire Lot 1 of Tentative Parcel. Map go. 7088. This firm is representing Inland in connection with the option and the possible acquisition of Lot 1 and has been authorized to deliver this letter to you. Please be advised that Inland is aware o' the recommendation made by the Executive Committee of the Industrial League of Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce at its meeting held on October 29, 1981 with respect to the amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan to accommodate a rail spur parallel to the proposed extension of Seventh Street in Subarea 15 of the Industrial Zone C of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The recommendation was- that there would be 20 feet of landscaping between the rail spur and the Seventh Street curb (five feet within the Seventh Street right-of- ,ray, 15 feet between the right-of-way and the rail) . Inland has previously expressed its views to members of the City"s Planning staff and of the Executive Committee cE the Industrial 'League to the effect that it would prefc: 7 no landscaped setback. However, in view of the apparent firmness of position taken by the Executive Committee and its commitment to the existence of a landscaped setback in a heavy-industrial area, Inland will have no 1 . Mr. Jack Lars November 19, 1981 Page Two objection to a landscaped setback no wider than that recom- mended by the Executive Committee. Please note that Inland is concerned about the type and extent of landscaping to be required by the City within the setback area and the expense to install and maintain any significant amount of landscaping. Very truly yours, _ J S E. McCORMICR III JEM:imn cc: Dr. John M. Vaughan Roger Ericson, Esq. Mr. Theodore Zwicker Mr. Joseph N. Dilorio CLEARK & TREVITHICH A PRUrC2ZI0NAL:OAPORAY10" LAW YCRS DONALD P.CLARK BOO WILSMIRE BOULCVARD,BUITE 700 WEsLCY G.LA FEVER AONALD L.TRCVITNICK OrCOUNUC-. JAMES E.MaCORMICK III LOE ANGELES,CAUFORNI.A 80017 DOUGLAS E.MORRISON (21i) 620-5700 ALEXANDER C.M,GILVRAY.JR. PHILIP W.BARTCNLTTI DOLORES CORDELL November 19, 1981 IN REPLY PLEASE RCF6�!TO: BTEPM EN N.TURNER I4150-003 Mr, Jack Lam Secretary of the Planning Commission r. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Proposed Amendment to Industrial Specific Plan re rail spur and landscaped setback along the extension of Seventh Street Dear Mr. Lam: We believe you are : ware that Inland Container Corporation ("Inland"; has an option to acquire Lot 1 of Tentative Parcel Map No. 7088. This firm is representing Inland in connection with the option and the possible acquisition of Lot 1 and has been authorized to deliver this letter to you. Please be advised that Inland is aware of the recommendation made by the Executive Committee of the Industrial League of Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce at its meeting held on October 29, 1981 with respect to the amendment to the Industrial Specific Plan to accommodate a rail spur parallel to the proposed extension of Seventh Street in Subarea 15 of the Industrial Zone C of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The recommendation was that there would be 20 feet of landscaping between the rail spur and the Seventh Street curb (five feet within the Seventh Street right-of-way, 15 feet between the right-oi-way and the rail) . Inland has previously expressed its views to members of the City's Planning staff and of the Executive Committee of the Industrial League to the effect that it would prefer no landscaped setback. However, in view of the apparent firmness of position taken by the Executive Committee and its commitment to the existence of a landscaped setback in a heavy-industrial area, Inland will have no Mr. Jack Lam November 19, 1981 Page Two 7. objection to a landscaped setback no wider than that recom- mended by the Executive Committee. Please note that Inland is concerned about the type and extent of landscaping to be required by the City i'. within the setback area and the expense to install and a: maintain any significant amount of landscaping. Very truly yours, _ IVA J 4ES E. MCCOMICK III j, JEM:mm 'r cc: Dr. John M. Vaughan Roger Ericson, Esq. Mr. Theodore Zwicker Mr. Joseph N. DiIorio i• k i 41 ,i i, 1i � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C, CAA40 STAFF REPORT I 90 z 1 r' w - O G � zf- 1977 ' V 1 DATE: fovember 25, 1981 T0: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jack Lam, AICP, Director of Community Development BY: Karl Hill, Planning Aide SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSIONS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. S 10045, 10363, and 11434 BACKGROUND: The attached letters from the Applicants request exten- s�&cn�r the above-described projects. The requests are based on present monetary problems and in regard to Tract 10045, the delay is due to the Hillside Channel not `sing completed by the Corps of Engineers. None of the above-listed Tracts have submitted plans for plan check to date. The approved Tentative Tract Maps are shown on the attached Exhibits "B" and "D" respectively. Listed below are i, the present expiration dates for each project. Tract Expiration Date 10045 December 10, 1981 10363 December 22, 1981 11434 November 23, 1981 Two of the Tracts, 10045 and 10363, are residential subdivisions and the other Tract, 11434, is an industrial subdivision. It has been the policy of the Planning Commission to approve 18 month extensions on residential subdivisions having been originally approved for 12 months; however, industrial subdivisions usually receive an initial. 18 month approval and then seek a 12 mcnth extension when problems occur. The extension periods being sought by each of the three subdivisions are within the regulations set forth in the Subdivision Ordinance. tt i ITEM G 1'lv Time Extension Requests Planning Commission Agenda November 25, 1981 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that an 18 month extension be granted for Tentative Tracts 10045 and 10363 and a 12 month extension be granted for Tentative Tract 11434 to run from the present expiration dates to the dates listed in the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, 1 Y JACK LAM, AICP Director of Community Development JL.:KH:jr Attachments: Letters from Applicants Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibits "ii" through "D" - Tentative Tract Maps Resolution i ,I. I 2' Y' f y George t 114. Mim Mack Consulting Civil Erjineer cr itiC ,r CPtFl10Tq�A COMmtura�Tr r,[vr::oPrrrN'r DEAT. R411WAY DESIGN i1gl T"ArFIC AM PAI ENGINEERING November 3, 1981 7A91101131L1i1213ra1SIF, LAND DEVELOPMENT City of 12ancho Cucamonga Engireering Departm_nt ASSESSMENT Att- : Mr_ Lloyd Hubbs DISTRICTS 934 Baseline P.oad UTILITIES Har.::ho Cucamonga, Califcrnia 91701 STORM DRAINS Re: Tract 11434 ENVIRONMENTAL Dear Lloyd, STUDIES We are hereby requesting an extension of time for twelve MUNICIPAL (12) months for tentative Tract 11434. We are requesting c'ONSULTING tl-ds extension on behalf of the owner, Hellman Industrial Park. If you have any questions r^_gar._ing this matter, ACOUSTICAL please contact our office at the number listed below_ ANALYSIS Yours very truly', -ALl George H. Mi-I Mack RCE 9399 GHM:gl q tl+: 214 SOUTH EUCL ID AVENUE, ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA 91761 114) 983.0439 1 ` I � T ENTAT I VE SHEET I OF I ! SCALE r' =60' - TRACT NO. 1.1.434 "FOR INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES" AMk IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA !CHIC A YnAlrl3w Or N110EL• a AND 3 W roRCCL Mai AX)3]25. Out IIna A5 R[CORGCO nl 00011 NI p rARCCL ML%'NL'C! CO•Lf.Rf..OR03 Or TIE CpIJNtt Or UN KWARAINII,STATE W CALIFORNIA. IX1f I1M CWIAIXI 10 WIS t•CIXito Ism M110\w 011ILBIO P n 01(CC1 W tlMLlll IX: 16 XF0 An10Y0 IOXI '-R'R 119421 X Rl:NICE C O 1-1.111C01 lB SryCIXL SORS t(Y011 11W1110 C1r1YL11NL CIIII tw'"Il1 11I44 SIIYYN CIRCLE -?Is. ]u 14010 1OCL10 MLA! TWIN tLI1L1011 IIII' 010 ACRES NET 4X1L110 [MAMA.\ 1110 IIILI Yll - IMS r1TC IS CUARENILY A LEMON .11U 101 0M1 UNCHARO CURWNNIU 005!TREES 30 LO BEACH MARK NQ 4.24 1111t111�111 C00(=111 rNY10�XL SInV�!�C(4 r BnI �~A'. M SgpmC 3tiXUx CLL"01.1,(a.s%(NOW It� IN CLS INI'm Ut1101MIL GO V!. 'NII SITE tPl1 MD onto LCCuINC&[Own ulI,,,OlStlltl Yin - •wIt COX wAY ENO SENfH STNELI IIN C((1"4E 1114E\L C[t(IXYII tdmn Syr - r11CIlr C1 LTS N B 31 I5 CE K OCWCgr[0 1 10 IHE CITY,Op RANCHO G.CA\IONM LIRE I , N S(MII"LICE A,'"WN1A CNN" 8' $ VICINIT! MAP NO SfHC 41 �Y 5— ; 7. y N F P^ e y1 1 W I wM� r, U N[19 db'd9"W . .• - � �111 IO 1 1 X I - o9/a` `SZj,o. . 1Q.I 10 ABV'd(•J•YW• T 1 'nl m� Kesvd:v-w_'�3 g��:",��'_- - v � ^ •-1 � L I f•C I R '11I\`�`n y1•MI/eY � Htl9'e4't<•LV 1Y•)O' I \ �Ii4 � 1. Il I f h Iy E •Z ZIP 0. +d a pro, 3c �Nx o Y i J I II r nla+" ea-wfag9•de'41, I In GO'w l ev.e• ` w A'/1 10 INI n o. owr r` w A it I n ! Z I [t 4 p o'vCisw.r.. I 't! a. I 1 •�_• 1 yl. 11 01.1 al--. .x .��r$EVE1J7 — •_ J._���_<_.«—.e��ri.1 :i � 1 �� p• ...� •wx]__ ._ - ronv J ra w wry nd r'+•n';�� I---_ �1•- �p G«CwA.•G0la�' �IN BCI'BJ1 1� r 2 Oc . � I rr — "r__ %YN) r .I �' I '. I $ rylonCimLSECrION 411o,• l,L rr1A SEVENTH SIPrCT «...•._. Ymaox war r '! r October 26 1981 fir' l 'J Mr. Dan Coleman �prlfvl0r 1T: r,:y rt:; ; I'T Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 t Subject: Tract 10363 Request for Time Extension: Dear Mr. Coleman: As discussed with you on the phone, this letter will explain our request for an extension of time from December 22, 1981 for the 5 acre subdivision under development by Advance Construction do. (:iar•vin L-Udo't) of Beverly Hills. Such work as the soil engineering report, field topo, gradin plans, water plar. and maps have been prepared. In fact progress Lad bee-: race to the point of bonding for actual work on the land. As owners of this raw _utd, wa were sharing costs in a joint deveopment agreement. Advanc- rr-struction Co. notified us that they are giving up the project and terminating escrow because of high costs of developing, the loss of time from the moratoritmi and present interest rates. As a consequence mr wife and I (retired senior citizens) have had to assume the total costs of this proposed lot development amount;ng to over $12,000. Through no fault of ours we find it hard to assuae this extra financial burdeni. dicce we are not i;>, a position to e..ol-clop the property ouri;ctt•cs, fc request all exteasicr: in s_ ,e to d2termiue if anoL -er cau '_e fo,,wnd to carry on the pro.!,:c::. Rs oc:?'ui J yours, horta.- L. 595 West 25t': ;tree:: upland, California T;706 mb- vtil 1 IN TNG GITV DM RN1CN0 Ca[0.✓IONGA,COV.IIY Ol'eAN Y{yln( Irp �NR/if 1 nn L iNti.0 TENTATIVE MAP R ACT NO 103 (033 � .LOT iL lvl,_21, GuL,.WwW.LwIDRJt ANr.hR.lY 4/�✓, 64N DL{•Wtell�p CWNIY Re:/H.De �e Rlr R.rD W JMWILtON CIVII NGINEEK _ ""`'"''""L"'"" SEPiEKAER, HEO 40VgHCE CDNi�CiIOH.INC Ohl N :1P RrLNw! - t w.gR.l.ie1K tlly 1:RW .try-L,y gy312 LI¢-{l�l-6ILe uraa Dwus�. NDRtoN•uo LAVR<Ne y+/IyLL,C wy w i7�olmvf' vI4ND,(g4RTCVrh !?Inc Ilr I e NO1C5 _ •••••r`` � _ L ratan taNR. Lu.in.coe '! � YWYWLL.eWl.IOw OiNYIN IrlMD(!LI { ecwiRA4i•eeetlLiW aD t 4iK1{ltN y�� � 1`�\` /�j a w/aeR wwwce•c c w o. dT•— I w(' /•�•Nr•� tiWVll/O INIIJM,II4 -.. � LwW CY_R I�G.rL_ .1 a.al_r..,.v,cNnLn nLLcrn erDl. Acc-v WMltN yIWWT or eNolYla TN eLR RNLL.�ILn1/oc wAmL 1 � tr ` I .err , ......✓ _ Z YrC141TV Min' Moo O �,c�i��/f yam" '7. eA t•t 1.or .c I A.. e..w T ,�,{�' �\wr.i wl/ r4_.l .�__�..Aw � TS 14 v n• A, n. i. 09: DOI N I +,td,w ,w no.nteo -W4 WESTLAND VENTURE COMPANY CUCAMONG October 28, 1981 �r NdV UN F Y`DEVEOIO MF.N1 D PTA ;)9 196? ,M 7 ogyg�l0�]t�12��tiN�3���s�e Mr. hike Vairin, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: TRACT NO. 10045 HAVEN AND HIDDEN FARM ROAD Due to a Condition of Approval, 'in that building permits cannot be obtained on Lots 17 thru 26 unti.l the Corps of Engineers construct the Hi'iside Channel, it is requested that we be granted an extension of the date by wh•;ch we must file our Final Map on. the subject property. (The referenced tentative tract was approved on December 10, 1980, Resolution ,PR0-77.) In accordance with City policy enclosed herewith is our chick for $62. Thank you for your ccopet . Ion in this matter. A.W.J. fi , a general partnership, et al S-un A. Angona, a partner SAA/cg Encl. cc: Bill Hump hrey."Mado I e S Assoc. r 1152 NORTH MOUNTAIN AVENUE SUITE 104 UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91786 714/981-022.8 � I II.:E=Se= Cie 99: - bnBligE� ��=�ry�FP. i Imo•--��ll 6 ggrNp•�t�� /' ;� ell Nil si ZI w _ �V: � I Iif @@d @; . 0g Jj 9 v r a• �c? i . zo= OW\ Fo ZM�V C . 4 Ci 'j,•C / ' .. .'rN� ?'i � ? _ L, t. ::V7L � Z V `gyp E! a t '/ .t�.�•' � I I �• wxC♦- AdshL go mi tar Lc:,.e� a.. �y,'Y - �_ •� .. � o V N�A•�N..�i. �ti � I :�. �'•. k ee ya x � I • ' iy �` I/ �� �0� F yVl �I _ it 1 11 P w 11 GP x o. 1t Q� w tb ll 2P qt Y �• O y '3AV AdU3H7 g by l J W O 1 N ill f 17. O C c W Wil N 4 < N O // ¢ < cc2 WII ¢ W 0,LL 1 O N wt1 u d Y ® NI S ! ply '!b '3AV VONVMII3 all �sb 1 g 1 UD 1 W N33N7 AVO 4a .'3AV d131S3H7UL 1� _._•� l x Q c 1 o p99 us A 1 W 41 1 < O < Q l...g '- uu ll �gp Qm� cz Lu '3AV N3AVH 1q VSOHy3H tl Y > �: rg 183Ndllll ti a �.1 11 a V S b •Y '< U 3nv O�re+H7tlV cc x a V NVW ll3H o •� ' Uy.1 � • � o Y _ e 1 Wa 11 �. or. Y i �•/ p x '1S NVI"IT.JHV3 VONOWV707 (3AV Utl 'A3NIA 3P }, I x ¢ ll o ze c pso �L1 0 u H� it J a ¢ W r -d p Z a ¢ V 31IN3AV Ull7ll3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE EXTENSIONS FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO'S. 10045, 10363, 11434 WHEREAS, applications have been filed for time extensions for the above-described projects, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordin- ance 28-B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held duly advertised public hearings for the above-described projects; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above-described tentative tract maps. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the followingfindings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a lac!: of financing and high interest rates for c,r - struction; B. That ;iese economic conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time; C. That external physical conditions have caused delay in the start of construction. D. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would Y be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code, E. That the granting of said time extensions will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or wel- fare, or materially injurious to properties or improve- ments in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants time extensions for the above-described projects as follows: Tract Expiration Date 10045 6/10/83 • 10363 6/22/83 11434 11/23/82 i APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Resolution No. Page 2 t BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planninr Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commissiun of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly •oduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City o, Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on +.:ie 25th day of November, 1981, by the follow ng vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: LOES: COMMISSIONFRS: r ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: t•. 7 i;. I r r - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cI)C-A o STAFF REPORT O I�O DATE: November 25, 1981 I> 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall , Engineering Technician SUBJECT: VACATION OF THE EAST41,rLST ALLEY - located 149' 4 south of Ninth Street between the Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way and Calaveras Avenue Attached is a letter received tram the property owners adjacent to the above- referenced alley requesting it to be vacated. In a conversation with Mi-. Ynostroza, owner of Lot 19, he indicated that he and his :neighbors were planning on fencing in the area to be vacated to con- trol the vandalism that is occurring. Mr. Ynostroza has also purchased a portion of the Santa Fe right-of-way as shown on the attached map and is plan- ning on moving his fence back to include this property. Upon field investigation, the adjacent lots wrtre found to have street access and the alley was found to be unpaved and of no use to tha City or to abutting property. An inquiry has also been received from the owner ( �' Lot 26 located at 8735 Calaveras Avenue to vacate the east/west alley adjacent to his property. No petition has yet been received. This portion of the alley is also unpaved, with lots having front access. These alleys also serve to rece`ve runoff from lots to the. north. In the present unimproved condition, however, the water continues on to the southerly properties. With vacatici of the alleys, the runoff will flow directly to adjacent property. It is proposed to require acceptance documentation to cover this situation, which will not change physically but will legally. If the vacation of these alley, is concurred in by the Commission, it would be in order to make a recommendation to the City Council to proceed with the vaca- tion process. Respectfully sub fitted, k LB : :jag Attachments - ITEN H Yb Lloyd Hubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucannnga P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 This is a request- for the vacatirm of the East/Wst alley located 149.37' south of Ninth Street between the Santa Fe Railmay and Calaveras Avenue. Them are no drive approaches and the alley is unpaved. Adjacent- Property Owners: Paul Ynostro 8734 Calaveras .Avcmue Tract #1829, Lot #19 it ✓ /; � Rotmla and Julia Guttero 8151 Ninth Street Tract 41829, Tot #3 C+ Church of God Prophecy Trustees 8137 East Ninth Serest Donald F. Lyle`s 0 Tract #1829, Trot #1 and #2 c- i Harvey, G tdner ack Sh�c�s VACATION OF ALLEY SOUTH OF 9 ft, ST EAST AND (NEST OF CALAVERAS — —9ln 15 , Z �• 9� 10 11 1 22 J � Q � ; c33 •na I e � � O, 2 ; �E 2 3 4 S 6 I 7 50) 4 11 ,I C $ r m l •p�� U 26 I 33 <a. lv -- 1 '2o m'r21 O !n ` D 28 35 16' b0 Wm m L 9 :72,3 22 29 36 (nl . 4 23 24 • - -. ie) 1 (r1 13 25 S1 1 (1) 32 r 39 ?1 . � •] 1 -I , •Y w, y err TO BE VAC?JED Ile PURCHASED BY ' MAR. YNOSTROZA CITY OF RANerxO CUCAM0,NTGA _ ENGINEERING DIVISION T �f 9977 VICINITY MAP �I e, page - � 1 1 • I { 1, { T, r / J � 1 i ,I .;� �', ..' � � it r: r i• ' rr ri�t"r g + r