Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/04/14 - Agenda Packet,--- ;, r:.; A C 's I O N APPROVED 3 -0 -2 APPROVED 3 -0 -2 MY OF RANCHO CUCAM Y\TTGA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA WEDNESDAY APRIL 14, 1982 7:00 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTcR 9161 BASE LINE;.RANC40 CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA F. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Cal? C"miissioner Dahl Excused Commissioner Sceranka Excused Commissioner King X Commi_cioner Tolstoy X_ Commissioner RempelX III, Approval of Minutes March 24, 1982 IV Announcements V. Consent Calendar The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, then it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR SITE APPROVAL 81 -01 B. TIME EXTENSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PARCEL MAPS: Parcel Map 5795 Parcel Map 6395 VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving ;;our name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per Individual for each project. 1. 1977 aTY OF RAND iO CUCA1MQ (34L PLANINTING Cs.'V€MISSION, AGENDA WEDNESDAY APRIL 14, 1982 7:00 P.M. LION'S PARK C0111UNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,.RAN -.HO CUCAMONGGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of'Allegiance H. Roll :all ConWssioner Dahl Conmssioner Sce'ranka_ Commissioner King Cow.issioner Tz,1stoy _ Commissioner Rempel____ III. Approval of ?Minutes March 24, 1982 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non- controversi :aI. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one elm without discussion. If anyone has concern over any ite, then it sbould be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR SITE APPROVAL 81 -0? B. TIME EXTENSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PARCEL YAPS_ M Parcel !Rap 57x5 Parcel Map 6395 V1. Public Hearings The .follor.-ing ttc are pmblic hearings in which concerned individ:z -tls may ,voice their opinion of tt.e related pra;';at, Pease Wait to be recognized by the ChNirman and address the cormaission from.the ` public micrcp:ione by aitring your name and address. All such opinions sha.0 It lilrrited to 5 minutes per 6 .individual for each project. 0 n w, _.. ..w.. ".a".."._.'.',. '�� tt.' .C, ... .... .. - _� ✓. dk�W.', .53r.' Ilk It i 01? ACTION APPROVED 3••0 -2 APPROVED 3 -0 -2 CITY OF r RAINCF -10 CUCAitiiiONCA PLANNING CC6UqLSSj01N AIGENDA. WEDNESDAY APRIL 14, 1982 7:00 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER S-'-'A BASE LINE,-RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIVORNIA I• Pledge of Allegiance II. Roil Call Commissioner Dahl Excused COMissioner Sceranka Excused Cora issioner ;Cing X C01=45sioner Toistoy X Conlr;ssioner Reempe:X [II. Approval of Minutes March 24, 1982 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar The foZlosvirg ^_on;ert caZeudai it, s are expected to be routine and nor.- ccrtroversia2. �ney rviil be acted upon by the Commi:.sicn at one time w_ !l2out discussion. If anyone has concern >tr any item, than it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR SITE APPROVI - 81 -01 B. TIME EXTENSION FOR ThE FOLLOWING PARCEL MAPS: Parcel hap 5795 Parcel Map 06395 VI. Public Hearings The following items are n.•uZ_v hearings in which conc,rretl i ..lviduals may voice their opinion of the related projc'C t. Please wait to be r<_+cogniZed by Lhe Chair---L2 and address the co=ission from the Public aScrophone by giving your nacre and address. All such opinions shalt be limited to 5 zainutes por individual for each project. rill' C Planning Commission Agenda April 14, 1982 Page Two APPROVED 3 -0 -2 C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTA11 E TRACT 11893 - CJL BUILDERS - A custom lot subdivision of 17.2 acres of land into 36 lots in the R -,- 20,000 and R- 1- 12,000 zones located on the sout,n side of Banyan, west of Sapphire - APN 1043.411 -01. APPROVED 3 -0 -2 'J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT A;iD PARCEL MAP 7350 - RANCHO LAND COMPANY - A division of 70 acres into 2 parcels within an industrial area located at the southwest corner of 6th and Utica Streets - APN 210 - 081 -07. APPROVED 3 -0 --,- E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE '82-04- PERMIT HARDER - The use of an existing 1,620 sq. ft. building for a dance studio in the General Industrial category (Subarea 3), located at 9613 Arrow Route, Suite "G ". IV. New Business Consensus that design E. HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN was good, but further discussion needed Within Community for other VII. Adjournnent ideas prior to sub- mittal t0 CC. Coricerns expressed relative to The Planning .:o=mission has adopted Adati.istrative monotony of 8dumanite. Regulations that set an ll:00 P.M. adjournment time. Zf items PC indicated choice of go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the trees - Jacaranda and, consent of the commission. Crepe Myrtle. r .: V J. _y CITY Or RANK I -ltd CU AMONGA PLANNING C0MMISSI0N O AGENDA WEDNESDAY APRIL 14, 1982 7:00 F.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 91fi BASE LINE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Call Commissioner Dahl Corm ssi oner King Commissioner Rempei� III. Approval of Minutes March 24, 1982 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar Commissioner Sceranka Commissioner Tolstoy_ The following consent calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. if anyone has concern over any item, then it should be removed for discussion. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR SITE APPROVAL 81 -01 B. TIME EXTENSION FOR THE FOLLOWING PARCEL MAPS: Parcel Map 5795 Parcel ?Sap 6395 VI. Public Hearings TFe following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and add-:ass. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. V l 1 RM E. Planning Commission Agenda April 14, 1982 Pago Two �L 6U;LDERS - A custom iot subdivisiorl afV17,2V�J - acres of land into 36 lots in the R -1- 20,000 and R -1- 12,000 zones located on the south side of Banyan, west of Sapp:-,'re APN '043- 411 -01. • rvw LL 1'Y1r lJDV - RlutCHO LAND COMP AM - A division of 10 acres into 2 parcels within an industrial area located at the southwest corner of 6t:7 and Utica Streets - APN 210 - 081 -07. -.�-.i1 aC -VI+ - MKULK - ine use of an existing 1,620 sq. ft. building for a dance studio in the General Industrial category (Subarea 3), located at 9613 Arrow Route_ Suite "G ". IV. New Business F. HAVEN AVENGE MEDIP DESIGN VII. Adjournment Me Planning Commission has adopted Rdminist_ative Reg:.-lations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. Tf items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. i i � `•. � ,r'* y r' -4 : ACK sir t'� ,j i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTE'S Regular Meeting March 24, 1982 CALL 'O ORDER The Regular Mceting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission way called to order by Chairman King at 7 p.m. The meeting was held at ti-•: Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga. Chairman King led in the pledge of allegiance. R -)LL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: Jeff King, Jeff Sceranka, Peter 'Polstoy, Herman Rempel ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Richard Dahl STAFF PRESENT: Shintu Bose, Senior Civil Ena_`_neer; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Jack Lan, Community Development Director; Jartco fl_cy„ulds, Secretary; Michael Vain± =, 'icaior °Lanner e.YPROVAL Or I+QNUT''.S Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to approve the Minutes of March 1, 1982, with recommended changes in wording on pages 5 and 15. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, c:, approve the Minutes of Marcia 10, 1982. Chairman King abstained from vote as he was not present for that meeting. ANNOUNCEMENTS Rick Gomez, City Planner, annoua�cd that the Planning Commission Tour was to be Saturday, March 27, 195? and that the bus we -- oe leaving City hall at approximately 9:00 a.m. and be returning- at around noon. Mr. Gomez also anno_ ci.-d that there would be a Town Meeting on f March 30, 1982 to discuss the Etiwanda Specific Plan. b at the Etiwanda Intermedi_te S:.ho.l . ".::,uitorium in Etiwanda beginning at 7 p.m. Mr. Gomez announced that the Planning Commission meeting this evening would adiourn to April 5, 1982 to discuss the Terra Vista Planned Community. This meeting would be held in the Lions Center beginning at 7 p.m. Mr. Gomez further announced that an addition would be made for tonight's meeting under Director's Reports, Item J, to discuss the Sharma Conditional Use Permit. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRON"' &TAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITION4.7. USE PEFZIT 82 -03 NORTHKIRK - The develo,-ment of a church facility on 3.3 acres of land in the R -1 zone, located on the east side of haven, south of Highland - APN 202- 54t -24. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM= AND PARCEL MAP 7237 - HAVEN AND HIGHLAND ASSOCIATION - A division of 11.3 acres within the R -1 =.:;u< into 3 parcels, locate2 on the southwp�t zz,,uer of Highland and Fia-�ren Avenues - APh 2^,2- G4i -'24. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Sceranka asked if the staff could review those concerns in the Staff Report, regarding the parcel alignment. Shintu Bose, Senior C = :uil Engineer, replied that the vacant piece north of the cr�urci rite is the main reason for statements concerning the realignment of the par ^el. If Parcel 2 way kept residential, it would pose a design problem for this Parcel Map. The Engineering .r± f-! :. the this would be an isolated area for a resi4 - =tjai area. Commissioner S_c;:nuka asked what CalTran's requirements were for this parcel. Mr. Bose replied that CalTrans had recommended strongly that arrangements were made so that access would not be from Have:. Avenue. Commissioner Tolstoy asked if there would be a median break in Haven Avenue, located at the proposed New Street. Mr. Bose replied that there was no reccm.a endation for a median break in Haven Avenue. Chairman ?ling ope:ed the public hearing. Larry Bliss, 7333 Hellman, Rancho Cucamonga, representing the Applicsnt, addressed the Commission and introduced Pastor Jerry Lyman of the Northkirk Presbyterian Church. Planning Commission Minutes -2- March 24, 1982 Pastor Lyman addre• >sed the Commission stating that a large number of the congregation were present for this meeting. He urged Pl.an.aing Cosnr._ssion approval of the Conditional Use Permit saying that it would be an asset to the Community as well is to the Church itself. :tor 'yman informed ,he Commission that his church had been meeting _ .979 at the Alta Loma High School and they were quite anxious to ,_ tour permanent church facilities. Commissioner Sceranka asked Pastor Lyman whether his congregation or the Church Site Committee had discussed with the Engineering Division's suggestion that the site not be aligned the way it was proposed. Pastor Lyman replied that the congregation and cr-_-ittea nad been made aware of CalTran's suv� zticoE., but had not made any plans to follow through with CalTrans suggestions. Larr7 Bliss addressed the Commission regarding the compatibility of the site with surrounding property. Mr. Bliss stated that he had spoken with many of the surrounding property owners and had been informed that they welcomed the addition of the church to their neighborhood. He stated that one of the concerns of the surrounding property owners was th_- visi_.iiity of the parking lot. This project was conditioned to have lighting in the parking lot and the parking lot would be adequately landscaped with trees to screen visibility. The property owners were concerned that there would be too many trees to block their views and that any Eucalyptus trees could stain their swimming pools. He felt that these concerns cou�d be worked out with the property owners. Mr. Bliss stated that an appropriate design had been selected in which pedestrian access was being provide? irom Haven Avenue. As to the use of the north parcel, Mr. Bliss stated that there were no plans for this parcel at this time. The property owner is not proposing any use in the near future until the freeway situation is resolvad and until the future needs of the community are known. Commissioner Scerad a asked Mr. Bliss if he had ever discussed with staff the possible realignment of the parcel- i�_ Bliss replied that he had discussed this possibility with staff, however, to align the parcel north to south with the cul -de -sac street along the east side would require the church to purchase an additional $70,000 to $80,000 worth of land which they could not afford to do. Commissioner Ring asked Mr. Blizo if ii concerned him that, assuming the freeway went in, the proximity of New Street to the free-:ay would be approximately 280' and that the only way you could get into the project site would be by going south on Haven making a U -turn at 19th , treet and if going north on Haven you would have to make a U -turn on Highland to go south. Planning Commission Minutes -3- March 24, 1982 Mr. Bliss replied that it would be morn than 280' before reaching a ramp to the freeway becau >e of dedicated right -o£ -way. He stated that he had timed the lig'•ta at 1Sth Street and roughly 12 -I5 seconds elarse3 :a give cars time to pull in cr out cf the street. He felt with those controls acid primary uses being on Sunday and not curing peak rush hours, access would not be a problem. Dick Nelson, Chairman of the Property Committee for the United Presby- terian Church, addressed the Commission stating that the property on Haver was selected by tha ';ommitree because this locatlen would be scar the new c_nter of the City. He stated that he £eit the proposed use would be compatible with the surrcundirg area. The CommiL.:ee the ^_ked the GEneral Plan and Zoning and saw nothing that would indicate that this would not be a compatible site. lie had not personalty been in contact_ with anyone who was opposed to the proposed chur -h site, b,-t had ')een in contact with property owners in the area who were in favor of tine site. He further stated that the reasor for the street being rlaced on the north side of the street was because CalTrans had suggested a common easement or one break in the street to both rroverties was pre- ferable tnan two separate access points. Jeff Hill, 960' Cameron Street, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the Comm ;ssion stating was is favor of the project as a member of the church and also a res' tent of the Ccmmunit-j- Floyd Allen, h4C2 Haven Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, addressed the Coa®i5sion stating that he was not a member of the church, however, was an adja.ent property ownur dishing to voice his ,uppert of the project. There were no fu ^ther public comments and the public hearing was closed. Commissicner Tolstoy stated ghat_ 'he agreed with the people who had spakuLx ir. favor of the church being at that site, but had some problems with access. Any car comeng out of New Street would have to travel up to Highland :.venue or the Freeway, whichever intersection happens to be th?rn, and make a U -turn to travel south on Haven Avenue. Commissioner Tolstoy stared that it was his opinion that that was not a good situation. He felt that the Commission s[.ould not approve the design for a street where people would have to mak_ U -turns in order to go the direction they needed to. He further stated than he a1sc, .ad a problem with the cut ic.i:cw Street that close to the proposed freeway property. He suggested that the Church be constructed in a north /south direction, New Street be e?.'_minated, and thaL the curb cut be placed as far south as possible and possibly break the median so that cars would not have to go north and make a U -turn. Commissioner P.enpel stated that he felt that worse problems would be created by placing a cut across raven. He felt that Line proposal of the applicant was the best solution. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. "nose to tell him the problems he thought Planning Commission Minutes -4- March 24, 1982 would be created in the 290' from New Street to the freeway on ramp. Mr. Bose replied that the problems he could foresee would be those of rear end accidents caused by people co^ing at a higher speed approaching the on tamp and people slowing down to turn into New Street. Commissioner Sceranka asked if the 290' was adequate distance to provide for a turn onto the freeway and still allow for access onto Haven. Mr. Bose replied that it was adequate distance. Be further stated that he felt it was inappropriate at thie time to take dedication on a street at this location. It was kept open on the )::rcel map by providing only one access from Haven to provide a joint- usa,driveway at the property line. Future development would be required to dedicate at the time of development. Commissioner Sceranka stared that he felt goat through the Design Review Committee, Planning and Engineering staffs, they game up with the most appropriate design for this site. He further stated that he did not feel that a major traffic problem was being created. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceraika, carried to adopt the Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 82 -03. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: C01,24ISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: REMPEL, ' CE.RANKA, TOLSTOY, RING KY*)AU0 NONE Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried to adopt the Resolution approving Parcel Map 7237, includ.ng the offer of dedication for New Street. AYES: CO uitSSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: C0114ISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, RE:MPEL, KING TOLSTOY �•.i_ NONE Commissioner Tolstoy voted No for the reasons previously stated. 7:50 p.m. The Pla: -a -,g Commission Recessed 8:00 n.in. The Planning Commission Reconvened Planning Commission Minutes -5- March 24, 1982 Upon the COmmission's return to the podium, Chairman icing stated that there were some concerns voicEd over the zoning of the parcel located north of the church site. It was the consensus of the Commission that staff lock into some of the issues as it relates to the land use and zoning on than niece of property north of the church site. C_ - PIC 'N' SAVE - The development of a 850,000 square foot ware- house distribution center, offices, truck teraice center, and a 25,000 square foot retail store on 91.4 acres of land in the General Industrial category to be located on the north side of 4th Street, 2300' west of - tiwanda - APN 229 - 283 -50, 51. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Rempel askel where the excessive drainage from this site would go into the normal channel. Shintu Bose, Senior Civil Engineer, replied that ti.ere was no actual design at this time, but what is intended is for an c,ntflew device from the retention basin which will come out in a pipe into ;n existing double culvert across 4th Street. The pipe will be extended to connect to Day Creek Channel when that channel is improved. Chairman Ring opened the public hearing. Mara Frankel, representing Pic 'N' Save, addressed the Commission stating he would answer any questions the Commission had. There were no quest: -)ns and Mr. Frankel introduced the project architect, Doug Lowe. Mr. Lowe, of VCA Architects, stated that there were two areas of section three of the Resolution which he wished to talk about. The first item was the condition for a color band around the building. Mr. Love stated that the architects had intentionally presented the design without a color band at the top of the building. The building had beet designed to be grey over grey in color to give the appearance of the building setting upon a base. A small detail band had been added to, t:E plans, which the architects felt was aesthetically pleasing, but did not feel that a three foot stripe was aesthetically pleasing and was objectionable. The other area of the Resolution which Mr. Lowe addressed was the con- dition providing for landscaping along the eastern property line. He stated that the easterly property line was, at a minimum, 13' above the street and that landscaping along that line would not screen the building from view. Commissioner Sceranka asked if there would be truck loading docks being screened by this condition. Michael Vairin, Senior Flarner, stated that he felt that the landscaping Planning 'Commission Minutes -6- *larch 24, 1982 had been provided for and that this added Conditioit could be eliminated. Commissioner Rempel stated that so- 3blast texture would be preferable to painting the building. This would proviee a better looking building aesthetically for a lunger period of time. There :sere no further public comments and the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Tolstoy, carried, to adopt the Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 82 -01 with the deletion of the conditions requiring a color band around the building and landscaping along the eastern property line. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, TOLSTOY, RMIPEL, RING 170ES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSEiiT: COMKISSIONERS: DAM ABSTAIN: C07.4'SSSIONERS: NONE D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7280 - THE ROBERT MAYER CORPORATION - A residential subdivision of 23 acres into 2 lots, located on the southeast corner of Arrow Route and Turner Avenue - APN 290 -091 -5 and o. Shintu Bose, Senior Civil Engineer, reviewed the Staff Report. Chairman King opened the public hearing. There were no public comments and the applicant was not present, therefore, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to adopt the Resolution approving Parcel Map 7280. AYES: COMMISSIONERS:. REPPEL, SCERANKA, TOLSTOY, RING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 11893 - CIL BbILDERS - A custom lot subdivision of 17.2 acres of land into 31 lots in the R- 1- 20,000 and R- 1- 12,000 zones, located on the south side of Banyan, west of Sapphire - APN 1043 - 411 -01. Planning Commission Minutes -7- March 24, 1982 Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Bob Nastase, representing C/L Builders, addressed the Commission stating that C/L has held this property for a number of years and with construction of the Cucamonga Creek, it is a more viable piece of property, and they wish to proceed with this subdivision. Thomas Velnosky, 6173 Peridot Avenue, addressed the Commission in opposition to the project stating that his main concern was with the continuation of Peridot Street. After having lived on a street with through access, he had decided that we would prefer to raise his family in an area with no through traffic and load selected his home on Peridot because it was on a cul-de -sac street. He was also concerned about the variation in elevations which would result from the custom lot subdivision. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Velnosky if he had spoken to the developer prior to this meeting. Mr. Velnosky replied that he had not spoken to the developer, but had received a notice by certified mail and had called the Planning Division to discuss this tract with a Planner. Don Rachan, a resident on Indigo Avenue, addressed the Commission stating that he protested the way that the Piaster Plan had changed the project from a park site. He further stated that he objected to houLzs being, constructed on that site which might- obstruct his view for which ce paid a premium. Jack Ambegaoker, 8118 Peridot Court, addressed the Commission stating that he was also concerned about the continuation of Peridot. Dave Chapin, a resident on Peridot, addressed the Commission orating that he was also concerned about the continuation of Peridot. Ee felt that by staggering the lots to not obstruct the view of the existing names, the building of homes would not lie objectionable on that site. Commission-_ Sceranka asked Mr_ Chapin if he would tell him the approxi- mate time those homes acre sold. M-. Chapin replied that it was approximatley three years. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Chapin what he *_ought the intended use of the adjacent property was going to be. Mr. Chapin replied that he was told it would be a park. Commissioner Rempel asked if Peridot now ended in a cul -de -sac. Mr. Chapin replied that it does end in an asphalt curb. Planning Commission Minutes -8- March 24, 1982 Commissioner Rempel asked if there was a concrete curb to determine that it was not actually designed to dead end in a cul -de -sac. Mr. Chapin replied that when the homes were purchased the builder informed them the property was invaluable and could not be built on and that it was County property to be maintained for flood control purposes. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Chapin if he would object to a park site being at that location with access on Peridot. Mr. Chapin replied that he did not see where it would have to have access on Peridot, but rather access would come from Banyan. Commissioner Sceranka asked Mr. Chapin what use he would suggest for that site. Mr. Chapin replied that he saw no other use than a park site appropriate. Commissioner Sceranka stated that the property was private property and the Commission could mot state that there was no land use for that site and that a lazij use would have to be established. Commissioner Re=pel informed the homeowners that the General Plan designa- tion for a park in that location was not in existence when they purchased Their homes three years ago and that was only established as a park site last year. He stated that he was not implying that they were not told that a park would be at that location, bur the argument that it was General Planned as a part: site when they purchased their homes was not a valid argument. Bob Nastase submitted a letter to staff which he sent to Mark III regarding the lot 12 directly adjacent to C /L's site to attempt to work something out for the temporary turn - around since it does not have an adequate access. He stated that he did not know how he could deal with the problem of the street being designed to go through. It had been plotted for as it was designed to go through and the City had committed it as a through street. Commisf•i.iner Rempel stated that it was the County and not the City that had :ommitted the street to a through street. There were no further public :ommeats and the public hearing was closed. Chairman King asked if the purpose of Peridot going through was that of fire access. Rick Gomez, City Planner, replied that it was one of the original Conditions of Approval and a concept that is being continued into this subdivision by providing through access as per the fire district requirements. Chairman King asked it there were a way for Peridot not to continue Planning Commission Minutes -9- March 24, 1982 through, yet still provide for fire department access. Jack Lam., Community Development Director, replied that any discussion of an alternative to this solution would have to be reviewed with the Foothill Fire District. Commissioner Rempel infor -mad the property owners that the developer did not r.. submit his subdivision for half -acre lots because the General 71a-: designates land south of Banyan 12,000 square foot lot area. He also stated that he aid not feel that their concern that all of the residents in the new development would be traveling on Peridot was valid. The shortest route for most cf the residents would be to go north, not south on Peridot and then: back to Banyan. Commissioner Sceranka asked Chairman King if he could once again open the public hearing so that he could pose the question to the property owners if the traffic caused by i,elve or thirteen homes traveling on Peridot would be a significant enougi: impact that they would want the project denied. Chairman. King opened the public hearing. !Ir. Velnosky replied to Commissioner Sceranka's statement by stating that the number of homes would almost double the amount there now and he felt that it would be a significant impact. He also felt that the fact that there were no sidewalks on those streets was a major concern. Chairman King closed the public hearing. Commissioner Rempel stated that the new development would have sidewalks on at least one side of the street. Be also informed the property owners that they could approach the City with a request for sidewalks. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that his concern was for streets in the City which were long and cul-de-sacs and that by keeping Peridot a cul -de -sac it would not be good policy for fire safety reasons. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would like to see the project con- tinued until the next meeting if it was agreeable with the developer so that he could meet with the property owners to discuss their concerns and give them information on how they were doing things and why. Bob Nastase, of CIL Builders, stated that he would be agreeable to meeting with the homeowners and wished tc have staff and the Fire District present at this meeting. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Sceranka, carried, to continue Tentative Tract 11893 to April 14, 1982; however, the Commission did not feel that it was necessary for staff to be present at the homeowner's meeting. Planning Commission Minutes -10- ;larch 24, 1982 AYES: COM!lISSIOVERS: NOES: ColeaSSICN7-9s: ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COWISSIONFaS: TOLSTOY, SCERANKA, ICING G ►_, .r_ NONE Commissioner Rempel voted No on this continuation as he did not feel that the map needed to be changed and did not feel that anything would be gained by the continuation. 9:30 p.m. The Planning Commission Recessed 9:40 p.m. The Planning Commission Reconvened F. ENVI90IZIE1QTAL ASSESS'�MNP AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMEIMMENT 82-03 - Amending C -1 and C -2 zones to allow arcade uses subject to review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Sceranka asked if it was staff's intent not to prohibit or restrict these kinds of machines from liquor stores. Mr. Gomez replied that the Ordinance would allow up to three machines in unspecified areas within the C -1 and C -2 zones. Commissioner Sceranka asked if thought had been given to making an exception in the cases of liquor stores. He felt this was not a desir- able place for young people to gather to play games. Mr. Gomez replied that liquor stores had not been singled out as an exception to being allowed to have machines. Cem- missioner Tolstoy stated that he snared the concern of Commissioner Sceranl'a in that liquor stores were not a good place for children to be playing these machines. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, stated that he had worked closely with Assistant Planner, Dan Coleman, in drafting this Ordinance. They had come up with the condition in the Ordinance that there must be adult supervision in establishments at all times where these machines were placed. He further stated that they could not come up with a solid foundation for stating ghat liquor stores should not be able to have video games. Commissioner Sceranka asked i5 there was a definition of a liquor store. Planning Commission Minutes -11- :•larch 24, 1982 Mr. Vairin replied that he did not think that the present Zoning Ordinance contained a definition of a liquor store, but felt that the definition _'ould have to be that the main use of the store be for the sale of alcoholic beverages. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he had a concern relative to the of adult supervision. Mr. Vairi:j replied that adult supervision would mean an adult on prises at all times able to see the machines. Commissioner Sceranka as'Sced if an adult was a person over of age. Ted Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, 18 of age or over. an adult was a person Commissioner Sceranka asked for clarification of Section III D -2 of Ordinance regarding storage garages for the use of patrons. Mr. Vairi^ replied that the statement was a part of the original Ordinance and that -:s the reason it was included in the amending Ordinance and he interpreted it to be storage garages for use by the store owners as a storage area. Rick Gomez, City Planner, stated that if the Commission was not comfortable with that terminology, they could change the wording of the Ordinance. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would prefer it to read storage garages for the exclusive use of the above stores and businesses and eliminate the use of patrons. Chairman Ring opened the public hearing. Bob Clascock, representing the Sign Ordinance Review Committee, addressed the Commission and asked if the floor space requirement had been changed from the draft Ordinance. Vairin replied that it had been clanged to read three machines the floor space, whichever was less. Mr. Glascock asked if the definition of an amusement_ device had been changed in the original Ordinance. Vairin replied he thought the definition had remained Nr. Glascock stated that his only concern then was the same as Commissioners Sceranka and Tolstoy regarding the placement of am=usement devices in liquor stores, other than that he felt it was a very good Ordinance. Planning Commission Minutes There were no further public commetts and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Toistoy stated that he felt that a provision needed to be placed in the Ordinance so that machines could not be placed in the ingress and egress of a stoz -i. Commissioner Rempel stated that this addition could be rude along with the square footage of the machine being calculated in the 5% floor space f ig sre . Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would like to see a provision in the Ordinance to prohibit anyone under 18 from playing the machines in a liquor store. Ted Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, stated that the problem in doing this is in the area of the definition of a liquor store. In doing this, children would not be able to play the machines in stores where liquor is sold that is not a liquor store, such as supermarkets and. convenience stores as they also sell liquor. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he would like to see staff work with the Sheriff's Department and the City Attorney to try to work out a solution to the problem of the machines in liquor stores. Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried, to adogt the Resolution recommending approval of the Ordinance to City Council with the suggested changes regarding storage garages, square footage of video machines and machines being kept out of the ingress and egress to stores. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, REMPEL, TOLSTOY, RING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE: AWENT: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE NEW BUSINESS G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEU 81 -29 - CF" The development of a 4,190 square foot furniture store on .38 acres of land in the C -2 zone, located on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and San Diego Avenue - APN 207 - 102 -16. Michael Vairin, Senior P'_.arser, reviewed the Staff Report. Richard Chado, Applicant, addressed the Commission stating that he felt that he was proposing a well designed project and his only request was that egress be granted off of Foothill for fire access and safety reasons. Planning Commission Minutes -13- March 24, 1982 Commissioner Sceranka asked if the Fire Department had reviewed and commented on that access. Mr. Vairin replied that they had reviewed the access and that the access may be an emergency access only point. Commissioner Rempel stated his concerns regarding the placement of a new building on the corner of the site without knowing what was proposed for the remaining portion of the parcel. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he agreed with Commissioner Rempel since they would be using part of the existing larger parcel for ingress and egress to their loading dock and part of their parking. The Commission should know how he is planning to integrate this with the other parcel. Commissioner Sceranka stated that he disagreed with this requirement because the applicant had followed the suggestions of staff and was consistent with prior approved projects and felt that he should not be required to come up with a site plan for the remaining portions of the parcel. Commissioner Tolstoy stated it was not a matter of whether this project was good or bad, as he felt that anything at that intersection was an improvement. But since he did need to have ingress and egress from the large parcel, the Commission should know how he planned to integrate these projects. Commissioner Rempel stated that he felt this was a serious concern especially if the remaining parcel was sold and there were no site plans for it. Rufus Turner, architect for the project, addressed the Commission statiLQ that the Commission would have every right when the time came for devel- opment of the site to make sure that it coordinated with what is being proposed. Be stated that the concern of joint use of ingress and egress could be satisfied by a lot line adjustment since the ownership of both lots was the same. He also indicated brat there are no plans for devel- opment at this time for the remaining section of the parcel. Chairman King indicated to tl good faith effort to improve That particular intersection sets the tone for the City. tone. le applicant that he would like to see a the appearance of the Roller City site. of the City is very important in that it As it looks now, it is not setting a proper Commissioner Sceranka stated that he agreed with Chairman King and felt that this was the first step to improving that intersection by giving them the opportunity to develop this site in a fashion that is consistent with the rest of the development on Foothill. Planning Coammission Minutes -14- March 24, 1932 Motion: Moved by Sceranka, seconded by Tolstoy, carried, to adopt the Resolution approving Development Review 81 -29. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: SCERANKA, TOLSTOY, REMPEL, KING NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DABL ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE H. .MRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 82 -05 - REITER - The development of three one -story office buildings totaling 41,072 square feet on 2.98 acres of land generally located on the southwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald. Michael. Vairin, Senior Planner, re:io:cu the Staff Report stating that t;i� project is part of the ongoing Cucamonga Business Park. The Applicant is requesting specific approval of the three office buildings as indicated. Mr. Vairin indicated that the Design Review Committee had reviewed the original architectural, drawings submitted and felt that they did not meet the design expectations of the City. Since then, the Applicant has submitted new architectural drawings incorporating suggestions of the Design Review Committee; however, these new drawings have not been reviewed by the Design Review Committee because the Applicant requested full Planning Commission review. Mr. Vairin indicated that one area which had not been addressed in the new drawings was that of the trash enclosure located along Business Center Drive. The Committee felt that the trash enclosure should be located somewhere in tt.e interior of ti.te project so that it would not become a focal point along Business Center Drive. Mr. Vairin also indicated that the Engineering Division was recommending that the driveway access on Arrow be eliminated. Mr. Vairin reiterated the Planning Commission's policy regarding detailed landscape plans and the submission of those plan:; prior to the issuance of building permits and the type of landscaping and design in conjunction with the architectural design of the building should be compatible. Be indicated that although the architectural drawings probably centered more on the building than on the landscaping, he felt that it should be stated for the record that the actual development would include more landscaping near the building for accent. Commissioner Sceranka asked what was the basis for the recommendation to eliminate access on Arrow Route. Shintu Bose, Senior Civil Engineer, replied that the recommendation was based upon the Resolution for access control and the statement that if access can be provided from some interior street, then access from a major street should be discouraged. Planning Commission Minutes -15- March 24, 1982 Commissioner Sceranka stated that hA felt_ that it was appropriate to remove the access on Archibald as stated in the Resolution to be con- sistent with the established policies; however, since there was 150` between Archibald and the driveway on Arrow, tI.._re would not be a traffic conflict. Henry Reiter, Applicant, addressed the Commission stating that he felt that the access on Arrow did not present a problem because traffic on ..rrow is minimal. "ounissioner Rempel agreed with Commissioner Sceranka that a user would -.ot go into a project without access. He felt that access on Arrow was the hest solution to the problem. Commissioner To_­,rcy staled that he agreed with the a'her Commissioners regarding access. He stated that the Design Review Committee should look into a requirement for projects to provide a walkw:.ty from the rarkii,; lot around t;ie building. He cited the Sizzler project as one where you have to wart on the landscaping or in the parking lot in cider to get to the front of the restaurant. He further stated that he would like to see -his proje_t provided with such a walkway. Motion: Yi ved by Sceranka, seconded by Rempel, carried, to adopt the Resolutio, approving Develc. -went Review 82 -05 with the additioi of the walkway, access on Arrow to re. .-ain a7d eliminate access on Archibald. AYES: CO2MISSIONERS: SCERIMNKA, RIIIPEL, TOLSTCY, KING NOES: C011USSIONERS: NONE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE DIRECTOR'S REPORTS J. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 81 -03 - SHARHA - A hearing to consider the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit f-)r a preschool located at 5113 Foothill, based on failure to comply with Conditions of Approval. 10:15 p.m. Commissioner Sceranka stepped d^wn. Rick Gomez, City Planner, informed the Commission of Mr. Sharma`s progress toward the completion of the remaining items of h'.s CUP. All the Con- ditions had been completed with the exception of those regarding land- scaping. He indicated that staff had agreed with Mr. Sharma to approach the Commission with the request for a sixty day extension to allow him the onnortuniry to contact a landscape contractor to assist them. Planning Commission Minutes -16- March 24, 1982 Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried, to grant Yr. Sharma sixty day extension to submit landscap: plans and complete landscaping as per Conditions of Approval. 10:20 p.r.. Commissioner Sceranka. returned to the podium. Jack Lam, Communitv Dw-lc -C.t Director, presented to the Commissioners copies of the final Industrial Specific Plan. Mr. Lam indicated that c-)pies had been distributed to the City Council and Chamber of Commerce and recognized Tim Beedle rend his staff for their time and efforts in working with tee Industrial Committee to develop this plan. fir. Lam a.'_so thanked the Chamber of Commerce for their participation in the completion of the plan. I. DESIGN RFVIEW II OF - WILLIAM LYON Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner, revieved the Staff Report regarding Phase II of this .Tentative Tract Map. Commissioner Tolstoy asked how much landscaping would be provided on the flag lots. Mr. Johnston replied that they would be totally landscaped. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Sceranka to adopt the Resolution approving Phase II of Tentative Tract 11934. AYES: CO11MISSI0NERS: REMPEL, SCUANRA, TOLSTOY, KING NOES: COIOUSSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: DAHL ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ADJOURNMENT 10:30 p.m. Planning Commission adjourned to a Regular Adjourned meeting on April 5, 1982, to discuss the Terra Vista Planned Community. Planning Commission Minutes -17- March 24, 19$2 0 11 El CITY OF gAIQ(I-1n CprCn'u`1viNWI STAFF REPORT DATE: April 14, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner SUBJECT: Karl Hill, Planning Aide BACKGROUND: The attached letter from the Applicant is a time exten- sion request for the above- dperri'aA przjac�. The request is Lased cn prasai,L monetary problems and specifically in reference to the sale of church -owned property to allow for further financing. The Planning Commission approval is due to expire on May 13, 1982. The approved Site Plan is shown as Exhibit "B ". The maximum time allowed by the Zo dng Ordinance for Site Aporovais (Conditional Use Permits) is two and one -half years. Site Approval 81 -01 was given a one year approval. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a twelve month extension be granted or Site Approval 81 -01 to run from the present expiration date to the date listed on the attached Resolution. Respectfully submitted, RICK GOMEZ City Planner RG:KH:jr Ateachments: Letter from Applicant Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Resolution ITEM A DMANITM BAPTIST CH : RCH 9565 - 19TH St. P.O. Box 75 i Alta Loma, California 91101 GEORGE W. MEADOWS. PASTOR Phone: 714 -967 -1816 The Planning Division -& Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga RAncho Cucamonga, California Dear Sirs: MArch 11,1982 On May !3,1981 you gave us Site approval for car new Church building. Due to circumstances invniuin, +?-- c_i- ❑aditic nal property we have on 19th St. we have not been able to proceed with dne erec tion of our Church building. We, Vlerefore, request that the Site approval be ext -!nded for one year to May 13,1983. We are expecting to have ¢he .ratter of the lane settled in th near future after which we will be free to proceed with the erect ton of our building - hopefully. Enclosed please find the cheer: :-uurct in the amount of sixty two dollars (62.00) which is for th.e lee for extending this : ite approval. Sincerely, Pastor /GF,orge W. Meadows :5A 6(•0i IN I'SUAWSHIP WITH THE G.AE.B.C. I IH t J 1 ?� = 1i _a 1� t z � r i _c t J 1 ?� = 1i _a 1� t z � r -_ 3'^t i Y V s9 fY CITY OF ULM: A RAI°CHO CUCAMUC TITLE: v ire 'Pt2n. PLANNING DnqSK),N, ExH1Brr - -- SCALE. Ar- t`b-r-y _c a S+t tc f -_ 3'^t i Y V s9 fY CITY OF ULM: A RAI°CHO CUCAMUC TITLE: v ire 'Pt2n. PLANNING DnqSK),N, ExH1Brr - -- SCALE. Ar- t`b-r-y IV Y 14C/M 17'Y /7AF CITY OF RANCHO CUChj /,iO;,GA PLANNING DIt'I uN 9YC 7N i9{�L ITEM: A_ EXHIBFP --A_ _ SCALE: !�T_ S _ 0 A RESOLUTION NO. C A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING TyE EXTENSION FOR i,E APPROVAL NO. 81 -01 WHEREAS, an application has beri, filed for a time extension for the above- described pro;cc.t, pursuant to Section 51.0219(0)86 of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Cmma ssion has held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described project. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the foiloWing findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a laic of financing and high interes` rates for co truction; B. That these economic conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time; C. That external physical conditions have caused delay in the start of construction; D. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code; E. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for the above - described project as follows: Site Approval 81 -01 Expiration Date May 13, 1983 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman t Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Panning Coumfission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of April, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES NOES ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: r L L. J L J 0 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STA1 F REPORT DATE: April 14, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engincer By: Barbara K.rail, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSIONS FOR PARCEL MAPS 57 °5 AND 6395 The attached letters from the applicants request time extat;sions on the subject parcel maps. Parcel Map 6395 is located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Heilman Avenue. The developer, Doug Huge, requests an extension of 18 months due to economic conditions. Parcel Map 5795 is located on the south side of Wilson Avenue, east of Fermosa Avenue. Peter Granger, the developer, is requesting an exten- sion in order to ailow additional time to acquire necessary easements. Listed below are the present expiration dates: Parcel Map 6395 Parcel Map 5795 May 26, 1982 March 25, 1982 An 18 month extension can be granted both parcel maps in accordance with Ordinance 28 -B. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Planning Commission adopt the attached approving an extension of time for Parcel Map 6395 and Parcel Map 5795 for a period of 18 months. Re ;pectfuiiy submitted, 1 LSH S.K'.`jaa V Attar raents ITEM B 1977 CITY OF RANCH CZJ'CA,�I ' A A E c GJ NGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP N page CI 1.1 �m L-2 T INIVF.7 PARCEL -MAP N" 5795 1=7 ITS zx*crrm WORM Lr • J Wad" S.00MYTf- Las a/WpCO VL: 1Q- 2a0afta6 wwlo� :3i leg=. is Maw" 0 0 �wr■�ua G•��itu■i nn■■nt�■un■.� nr ■ �u - � Gi ■ t M - .3�a� � '�:C 111 ■�n� . ��11p 11111 �► ttm n :IIIIM� Q'� O • ■�• 7` n ■ nt � i � Qn1!!!i t �■.n■ ■!nt • • ENGINEERING DIVISION E �N a V J ms's m 2a c cc QZ cc Q 2c.cv O --- a o cg QJ o� VS,jO O Doti ` 2 ba� Q iow i �r I I �T I; 1 1 _� W6• T LI JJ �T I; 1 1 _� W6• T March 19, 1982 J. M. WILSONs CIVIL SNZINEER 367 NOflTH SECONO AVENUE • UPLAND. CA 91766 • (714) 965 -26H5 City of Rancho Cucamonga Post Office Box 793 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Parcel Map 5795 — Extension of Time Gentlemen: We would like to respectfully request an extension of time for the subject parcel map to allow us to acquire : ,ecessary easements East and South of our property. We have included herewith a check for $62.00 which you requested in order to process this request for an extension of time. Very truly yours, C"r " ,� " °7 f/C/ / 2 Jerome M. Wilson !.rvwz ww Enclosure 1] LJ L] RANCHO CENTER ASSOCIATES 7333 Hellman Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 blarcb 22, 1982 City of Ranu'm Cuca onga P.O_ Box 897 Rancho Cucanonga, Ca. 91730 Pe: Extension Remiest Parcel Map ^;o. 6395 Sf•+7C Baseline - Hellman 0 Dear Sirs: A we herei;-, request to extend the time for recording of Parcel Map No. 6:95_ The pentative Tract map No. 11605 was previously extended for eighteen (18) months and we request an extension of +he parcel :aap long enough to coincide with the tentative tract map period. we have delayed recording of the parcel Trap because of the c==vnt poor econ nnic conditions. Encicsed is a check in the semi of $62.00 which we inidesstannd is the amount of the fee for such an extension. Yours truly, lCujLi. k- . Douglasi K. Hone Dwvr enc. z is 11 r] RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPR.OVIN; THE EXTEN.;IONS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAPS 5795 AND 6395 WHEREAS, applications have been filed for time extensions for the above - described projects, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2(b) of Ordinance 28 -B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and W4EREAS, the Planning Commission has held duiy advertised public hearings for the above - described projects; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described tentative tract maps. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the follow7ng findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a lack of financing and high interest rates for construction; S. That these economic conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time; C. That external physical conditions have caused delay in the start of construction; D. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations wouie not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Code; E. That the granting of said time extensions will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants time extensions for the above - described projects as follows: Parcel Map Expiration Date 6395 November 26, 1983 5795 September 25, 1983 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Resolution No. Page 2 BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman, ATTEST: Secretary o trite Plamm�g Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the r1 annirg Ce�r.issiun of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and rayularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of April, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYEZ: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C 1] E C CITY OF RANCHO C.-� �'..tON iA. MEMORANDUM 077 DATE: April 14, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planrer BY: Michael oairin, Senior Planner SUBjtCT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMEW AND TENTATIVE TnACT 11393 C/L BUILDERS - A custom lot residential subdivision of 17.2 acres of land into 36 lots in the R- 1- 20,000 -1- 12,000 zones located on the south side of Banyan Averue, west of Sapphire Street - APN 1043- 411 -01. At the last regular Planning Conanission meeting of March 24, 1982, the Planning Commission held the initial public hearing to consider the above - described project. During the public hearing, several property owners in the vicinity of the project voiced concerns re- garding the design of the project. The Planning Commission voted to continue the hearing to allow the opportunity for homeowners to meet with the developer to review and discuss their concerns re- garding the proposed subdivision. A meeting with the homeowners, the developer, and City staff was held on April 6, 1982, in which approximately 30 persons were pre- sent. The discussions focused on two issues: (1) subdivision design; anal, (2) the General Plan park designation. SUBDIVISION DESIGN: The homeowner group discussed a list of concerns relating to the design of the proposedl subdivision. 1. They do not wish Peridot Avenue to continue as a through street. 2. They requested that CUR's similar to that which were adopted for the adjacent Tract 9350 be adopted for this tract, which sets minimum dwelling units sizes rf 1800 square feet. 3. The property owners were concerned about the design of the homes that would ultimately be built. They requested that a requirement be placed to require homes to be built with tile or heavy shake roofs and prohibit composition asphalt shingles. ITEM C Tentative Tract 11893 - CiL Builders Planning Commission Agenda April 14, 1982 Page 2 4. The homeowners requested that during the construction plies° of Tract 11893, that all construction traffic be routea along Banyan rather than through PE -idot Avenue. 5. The homeowners requested that something be done to mini.ize reptile and rodent disolacemert toward their homes during the grading operation of *he protect. 6. The homeowners wished to be notified when individual designs for `iiesc ;c;,as are submittef fur City review. 7. Several of thu homeowners fe Banyan should be widened to presently fronting on Banyan t that the lots fronting on e more compatible wits: the lots Most of the concerns can be addressed thincyia appropriate Conditions of Approval on the Tentative Tract Map. To address those concerns, staff has prepared the following list of sugges`ee Conditions of Approval which could be added to the attached ResolLtion. 1. A Declaration of C?ve. ^.arts, C,•nditions, and Restrictions shall be established for Trac 11893 and shall include similar provisions which are contained in the CC &R's of Tract 9350 in ?Udirig, but not limited to, a minimum square Footage of each dwelling unit if 1800 square feet and a provision for til^ or shace roofs. The CC &R's shall be submitted to and approved b,, the City Attorney 4nd Planning Division prior to recordation of the final map. 2. During the grading and installation of street improvements, the southern terminus of Pericict Avenue shall be fenced to prohibit any access for construction vehicles or workers. ''orastruct'ion traffic shall be muted along Banyan ;') the front of the subject property. 3. The developer shall employ all Uown methods to minimize reptile and rodent displacement to the existing neighbor - hoo.is during construction of this project. 4. The design of each home within Tact 11893 shall be sub- mitted to the Architectural Review Committee, if any, for Tract 9350 for their review and nput to the City's Design Review Committee. if th--rc is nc active Architectural Re- view Committee for Tract 9350, tien the Design Review Com- mittee of the City shall be responsible for the review of each individual design. The Committee's review shall ensure that the homes will be architectu-ally compatible and of equal quality to the homes that ecist in the area. 10 CJ Ak 1w Tentative Tract 11893 - C/L Builders Planning Commission Agenda April 14, 1982 Page 3 5. Lots 1 -7 shall be redesigned as wider lots. This shall be accomplished by eliminating one of the lots and widening the remaining. The remaining design concern was the issue of the continuation. of Peridot Avenue. From an engineering viewpoint, the proposed subdivisior, design is the best design for this area, given the circulation aspects and drain- age problems in this area. If Peridot Avenue were to be cul -de -sac in its present form, a continued oroblem of drainage across Lot 12 of the adjacent tract would not be resolved. Also, the existing temporary cul -de -sac encroaches into the private property of Lot 13. In addition, the Enginee".- ing Division and Fire District set maximum length for cul -de -sacs at 500'. The continuation of neridot also allows adequate circulatior for emergency access. GENERAL PLAN PARK DESIGNATION: The General Plan Land Use Map ML:icates this site as a proposed park site. When the developer submitted an appli- cation to subdivide the site approximately one year ago, the project was held for process'.ng until the si, could be examined by the City Council Park Committee. The Director of Community Services and the Parks Committee reviewed the site to determine if the site was suitable. The Committee voted not to acquire the site based on land c-sts and the need for substantial grading. As the Commission will recall, the indication of park sites on the General Plan were not site specific and were intended to show general locations of Parks. The homeowners will be meetinq on Monday evening, April 12, 1982, at 7 p.m. in *the Lion; Center to discuss the park acquisition program and process with the Director of Community Services. The issue of whether this site should became a park is a decision that only the City Counril can make through an agreement to purchase the site. OPTIONS: Based on these new events, the Planning Commission has a series of options in considering this project. 1. The Planning Conmision could approve the subdivision as originally presented with the original conditions; or, 2. The Commission could approve the Tentative Tract Map in- cluding the new conditions outlined in this memo, or other conditions that the Commission finds appropriate; or, 3. The Planning Commission could continue the public hearing on this project to a subsequent Planning Commission meeting before May 1 ?, 1982. Based upon time limits established by State law, tha Commission is required to make a final deter- mination on the Tract by May 12, 1982. This option would be Tentative Tract 11$93 - CIL Builders Planning Cn aission Agenda April 14, 1982 rage 4 used in the event that the Commiss on feels that more dis- cussion is needed between either the developer and the home- owner or between the City Council Park Committee and the hori� owners. The Commission's basic responsibility in regards to this project is the review and consideration of the subdivision design. The concerns regarding the General Plan park designation is one which can only be dealt with by the City Council. Attached to this memo is a copy of the Staff Report and ,._commended conditions of Approval. Respectfully submitted, RICK GOMEZ City Planner RG:MV:jr Attachments: March 24, 1982 Planning Corenission Staff Report Resolution �7 11 0 E CJ L CITY OF P.Ai- C vo cuCAMON'GA STAFF REPORT DATE: March 24, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FRG; : Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 11893 - CL BUILDERS - A custom lot subdivision of 17.2 acres of land into 36 lots in the R- 1- 20,000 and R - -1- 12,000 zones located on the south side of Banyan Avenue west of Sapphire Street - APN 1043 - 411 -01 SUMMARY: The Applicant has submitted a Tract Map for the above - described project in order to gain consideration for approval by the Planning Com- mission. Approval of this project will necessitate approval of a Negative Declaration for environmental assessment and the Tentative Tract Map. The project has been reviewed by both the Design and Growth Management Com- mittees and has passed the Residential Assessment System. Staff has pre- pared a detailed Staff Report, related Resoluticn, and Conditions of Approval for your review and consideration. BACKGROUND: The Applicant, C/L Builders- Developers, Incorporated, is requesting approval of their proposal in order to subdivide 17.2 acres of land into 36 lots as shown. on Exhibits "A ", "B ", and "C ". The application is for a custom lot subdivision with all lots a minim= of 20,000 square feet. The proposed density is approximately two '} elling units per acre. The project site is bisected by two land use zones, R- 1- 20,000 and R- 1- 12,000. The parcel is designated on the General Plan as a potential park site. However, the Director of Community Services has determined that an alter- native site would provide a greater benefit to the residents in Alta Loma. The General Plan la>>d use designation for property adjacent to the site south of Banyan is Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). On the north side of Banyan, the General Plan designation is Very Low Density (less than t %4o dwelling units per acre). The project site is pres -ntly a portion of a 32.2 acre parcel. However, a levy on the west side of the project boundary separates the the 17.2 acres of land to be developer: from the remaining land which is used for a water spreading ground, as shown on the Natural Features Map (Exhibit "D "). Tentative Tract 11893 - C/L Builders Planning Commission, Agenda March 24, 1982 Page 2 The project site has no unique plant or animal habitats. It slopes to the southwest un' formally at approximately 9.5% with a fall of roughly 60 feet. The land is cleared annually for fire protection, since a natural flora develops during rainy seasons. Surrounding land uses include single family residential homes on 20,000 square foot lots to the north and east. To the west and south :s vacant I and adjacent to the '.ntersection of the Cucamonga Creek and Demens reek Channels. The City Limit is located just west of the project houndar;, ANALYSIS: The project, as shown on the attached Development Puns, is con- sistent with the surrounding land use designations shown on the general Plan since it falls within the density range designated. The project is being developed in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act as well as the City's Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance. Two points of access will be provided into the tract with extensions of Indigo Avenue off of Banyan, and Peridot Avenue on the east side of the project. Full str--et improvements will be required throughout the tract. A temporary cul -de -sac will be provided at the terminus of Banyan Avenue adjacent to lot 36. The existing curb and gutter at the south end of Peridot Avenue will to realigned to connect with the new street improvements. This will create a smooth transition between the existing and proposed devel- opments. Preliminary grading and drainage, as shown on Exhibit "E ", was reviewed by the Grading Committee and has been given conceptual approval. A 10 foot drainage easement will be required at the south end of Indigo Avenue between lots 23 and 24. Also, a storm drain will be required off -site on Peridot Avenue where a 30 foot drainage easement currently exists. Grading and Drainagt for individual pads is shown on Exhibit "F ". Each lot within the subdivision will have direct access to equestrian trails. The Design Review Cornittee reviewed this project finding it acceptable for this area. However, they did express concern with the configuration of the lots at the southeast corner of this tract and the existing lot 12 of Tract 9350 (See Tentative Tract Map). The Applicant for this project was unable to contact the developer of the adjacent tract to discuss the possibility of adjusting lot lines to eliminate the irregular shape of lot 12. A copy of the Tract Map and Grading Plan will be available for your review at the Planning Commmission meeting. -J C Tentative Tract 11893 - C/L Builders Planning Commission Agenda March 24, 1982 Page 3 Please find attached Part I of the Initial Study, completed by the Applicant, which discusses various environmental factors relative to this project. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study. No adverse impacts on the environ- ment due to this development have been found. If the Commission concurs with this determination, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing was advertised in The Daily P.eport newspaper on March 12, 1982. Thirty -nine public hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Com. ission conduct a hearing to consider all matters relative to this project. If the Commission concurs with the findings of staff, adoption of the attached Resolution with Conditions of Approval would be appropriate. RRsp=ctfully submitted, Individual Lots R CK MEZ City P anner RG: CJ : j r Attachmants: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "C" - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Natural Features Map Exhibit "E" - Conceptual Grading Plan. Exhibit "F" - Detailed Grading and Drainage For Part I, Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions Individual Lots CITY OF RAINCI-IO CUCATMO\GA PLANNING DIVISUN, TITLE :Vlr-iO i-r%,� m�aP EXHIMT -_tv_ -SCAI.E- q." 25 G� NORM 0 X10 GL z t'A C CITE' OF RAI CHO CUCATNIO`.'GA PLANNING DIVISION n NORTH ITBI, I.E�,, TITLE: T "1-f �t�E T�PLT HP-l' 61 -r El E 11 L.- CITY OF RAINCHO CU ATMONGA PLANNING DIVISION -;M ITEM= TITLE= _(�2LTi1� Fq s;7 GYHIBIT- _ SCALE: �L=i . r CITY OF RANCHO CUG%,j1jo GA PLANNING ©I�rIsIC El NORM ITEM: L it TIT'_E= E HIBIT: r-- -SCALE: Ll 11 lJ 0 I 7 t =a W r :r t� i` ply i% ----� I jI N7URS MNT 0 TYPICAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE QETAIL (REAR DRAINING LOTS) CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN eFf:T1ffN 1 Na /oti/ SECTION B —/ox y,, st A (WIDTH) 5•% S/ePc� i B (LENGHT) I CITY OF T TMO !, ITG:�I: u_fir RANCHO CUCANGA TITLE: UZ -reA111�c -£ st r' P.D1AiC�^ PLANNING DiVLSIQN EXHIBIT: SCALE- il.-L 5, CITY OF RANCRO CUCAN.ONCA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INMRMATION SHEET - To b. completed by applicant Enviro -= ental Assessment Review :Oee: x80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis stafF will nre_care Part II of the Initial Stady. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time t}:e project is to be heard. The Comuzittee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no envirorLnental impact and a Negative Declaratinn *.rill be filed, 2) The project will have an environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepare?, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further inforZliation concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Tract 11893 APPLICANtT'S NAME, ADDRESS- TET.FPRnV - CIT. Inc., 521 N. Mountain Avenue, Suite A, Up'land, CA, 91786 (714) 981 -1041 NAME, ADDRESS, TELE.FHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Bob Nastase, Same as above. LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL 2%70.) South side of Banyan, West of Sapphire. A.P.N. 1043-411 -01 & 1043 - 421 -01. LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AID FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: - a -i PROJECT DESCRIPTION DB2CRiPTION OF PROJECT: 31 Lot subdivision for custom homes. ACREAGE OF PROu CT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTI G AND PROPOSED BUILDINC:S, IF F?dY: 32.2 Acre total — 17.2 Acres Proposed in subdivisica and 15 acres are being sold to San Bernardino County Flood Control. DESCRIBE THE SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOPDMTION ON TO'YOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANII:ALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC AS1=--TS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AIM HE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (RTTACH NECESSARY SF:.ETS) The site is sloping to the south and mast. The site has n unique manmade or natural plant or animal habitats The site is clear,d �_nnually For fire prevention. as annual natural flora devalues durius rainy season. With the exception Qf dire aad debris b fnp di�mg ye site- it is flat plain a to an existing flood control dike. ."ha areas used for flood control and subject to inundation are not included in th- -is subdivision. Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series - of cumulative actions, which although individually shall, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No. I- 2 u WILL THIS PFDJECT: YES NO X_ 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? Y 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? S 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? R 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potertial.'y hazardous materials such as tox5.c substances, flamnables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IM?YJRTADIT: If the project involv6s the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby rertiiv that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the zacts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required red to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can be made by the Deve3cpent Review Committee. Date A.aril 10. 1981 Signature Title Project L'oordir_ator Z � S^P,IICTIO^7 The foilo :•:ing inoimation should be provided to the City of Rancho C acanozga Pl1-nning Division. in order to aid in assessing the abiiitl school district to accommodate the of the p_oposed residential developneit. *:ane o£ Developer and Tentative Tract No.: !/u P. 0, /mac T "y u89 ,. Specific I.or_ation of Project: �6uTR 5wr. PHrSr I PHA Sg 2 I. Nu:ab =r of single fani1y units: lots cwcr 2. Nuaber of mvItiole family units: 3. Date propos_d to * becia ccastructio. ^. 4- Ear'_iest -ate Oc occ__ s- ^c:: --5-L [•' =s �,4l�lirsor..�•v PHASE 3 PI?ASE 4 7 31 O Modn - n s and Z of Tentative S- Led•-cons PPrce Rance e- 45r&7A' Nom ` Ty /S /•Vf0 !S y.✓.�irraww i - Vt� , 4 RESOLUTION NO. E A RESOLUTION OF THE PUNNING CG,ti@IISSIGN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, C^NDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 11893 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 11893, hereinafter "Map" subm;tted by C/L Builders - Developers, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as 4 custos.� tot/ tract subdivision on 32.2 acres of land, located on the south side of Banyan Avenue, west of Sapphire Street into 37 lots, regularly came befcre the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 24, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forte in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planring Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 11893 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistert with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of de- velopment proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serous public health problems; (f) The design of `he tentative tract will not conflict with any easemee t acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. KI P5, �1 -- - . la Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 11893, a copv of which is attached hereto, is here-oy approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. A. fifteen '15) foot equestrian easement shall be designated between lots 8 and 10 to provide trail access for lot 9. 2. All lots shall meet the minimum width of 90 feet at the reou ?red building setback line, except on corner tot- where the minimum width shall be 100 feet, as spPcified in the Zoning Ordinance. ENGINEERING DIVISION 3. Applicant shall provide temporary c;l -de -sac at the end of Banyan Street as determined by the City Engineer. 4. Applicant shall reconstruct the existina temporary cul -de -sac at the end of Peridot Avenue with standard street section. including but not limited to curb, gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk (if required) and relocation of street light. 5. Applicant shall contact the property oener of lnr 13 T, -aci i".ap y35u prior to re,-,oval of the temp- orary cul -de -sac adjacent to the said lot. The remaining portion of cul-de-sac easement after re- construction shall be graded to match the existing front yard of the said lot and groundcover planted to the satisfaction of the City Engineer -. 6. Approval of final map will be subject to any re- quirements made by San Bernardino County Flood Central District in regards to lot. A. A letter Of compliance from Flood Control District shall be required prior to recordation of the map. 7. Provision shall be made in grading plan to drain the Old Cucamonga Creek at northwest of the project to the existing inlet structure at south- west of the project. APPROVED AND ADOPTED T'r'.IS 14TH DAY OF APRIL, 1982. U Ll L Resolution No. Page 3 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CLCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Comriss an I, JACK LAM. Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cuc:!::..oga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of April, 2982, by the following vote - to-wi t: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMU SSIONERS: r� 1 N q D V G i O J.O i D � - jl Y rC V_ � q✓ O N .Lir �'� J � .°.r ..0 N N cC Yi 'i O yN �� q� 'AC D L p t O d N g q .V• ° ' L=G gi.T.r >r^ 9 N l � b✓ O � = _ V ' 40 `� d R/ G J � ✓uG L d_ 40 CyDVLN J✓JC p Y V�rN �•' "�FVV V L p O q L G V r Y V V 9. N L > V l✓ L C O M 6 9V 9� u n6� ✓L Q Tp 4dC q✓O EP ^ b rJiru d ✓A ZZ N� uu r= r c✓OV .� r�L�� V �c V S ` c rr EG L9 6 9 �V �_G 6N 4 O rr •'� _V �I:Y6 tT4�90 yy ^ L ✓ V �_ m w 6 .. .. � G V G C V O 1 J .� O J O u G ri•J 9 C ^ q N D 4 6 � O rtiO� .4• >L V ^V p uG G H L4 jp}O O C C N �� C O 6 m 4 C C L ^q w y L ✓L dq yC ur �. N V w Y N N C W frJ D 4 L- 'CU d N d° VGgV�IU L q ~ 00 Op ^ O V cS�ird y�T p S L C 7 2.;.!! G- 9 = W W✓ V G l i L� 0 L. b^ � 6 V 9 6 N W� 0 0 L 2 r C � N e -= .. c o p u 3r r 7 ' e • � ' c � -= II C L i :. G 7 - E yV bV NV 2 V POLP O N. W�uV y dQ �' O 4 C� Ow- A� dr �nG�pc n V 9a re oo N rvlr yv�oE w� ^G 60 NC 9 b? -V V^ O Lu iLpq >2 •yy• G L v6 L .b. Nl ^ i^ -SVpO q� 4 C` CO.O• O L V. .=r.Y L w L � N Lr � y �• S PQ CC ~ � p0 `.G •+re .^ r0 }C ° YP J�✓C.O M N T� ° �� L� ✓_ y path LVT G� O � Y .L. C O y 1 O V V^ N p C l- O J^ G C N J� V ^ CC Y Cy ✓b - ° CV�V� N C ^E IUrV m0 �� Cu d Y > ✓"i OJ -6 o NC E U �4 L -FW yCy'J Oi. L°V yu 0L�9 4 i c� r4 > LC Ci L ✓ G G ` C r = d i L OT 8.5 Y _ 4 5 ✓ V L u C 9 � u d u 4 q E U V C S VV � 2 O�i NL CC C^V�l O �G 94 9C � y� Ore V4 Lu �'d4E �C/E4 l9 P 4 3N L�40 C� N ✓rC Y. - nr pNdVUp =� C ^ 9 S O J 7 N .rJ. Q r N 6 Q y N O 5 V yEyE r W 2 r 2 W y m 4 11 ✓ T r V V C L _ 1 - _ y 4 ^r✓ 77 u J c° L 9 f'J C C y q V w D 1 C V O O 6 C^ q p � ✓ l V V Y M j^ L M 1 6 C N O� W � q V C M C L q pE P V l O y •� l q C' q u 9 +T+ C V C �E L ra V V N y de C6 =O V LO G� Nip Ld Gyy2L � G Z= N V C6 V'N Nu g V L l D= SV.O I .O q •pJ u Z 1 �Y CO GY VN qb .D OGJ n2. 40 JV rC YNL_ uP Q N r b C u O O VV L r �J ry = .` V V � O C r V �' N N V V J C J q C �• � N ° S N O C V� V V r H N S 1] V ✓' O G L O O O W _ e > 1 1 W S e P LO t d O u V j y E VT e p .T. ^r0 �•y i V V i p G I w L V b 8 O _ i L p y w 0c COC r- .mw - C.n pp M �Pl V 04 V✓- q OV O. CV^ -.yJ NOL H LC V G _ CLV p O � O CJLp s0 a Yr w r.Jn V✓C M.°. � � r VGU ^ rC y V V Q O� GO b 7 96 V' 7 =L Vci T y O�� Tv O N6 Cq r[j V ♦ r TEE N 9 d Y C Du uOr O. Gpu VG aL GOO Z •~n k ? a' T= b� V V= ° C q N N Ja F r'�e an _ T Y N V 00 C 4 p w G cc PdE pM O u'.^" �✓ 6�V nM ^V yr Y 6 iC6 YZ O VC- CVC !_ q� N .�V VP� `p O -O __ ✓O ky '> V _ ✓- >C �m pD✓ q.. CC cc G Cu GpV ` �r p~ V O TP C N CL Y9 ZV2 J 8N NV4 ti C r q ��� y � G J 9 �• �� 1 1< V t\ .^✓r _O NNp OCOS �O �.°.r O •V✓ VV� Op �r �� ^<' .r V a4i 6N CC JO V I L�� > O`r .°.r CM CCL OVG C�•q �< �P10 •� 0 qr V p _ _V Yu _VG N° : r rL^ v V Y w O p L � (n rn L V u -O q_ ✓NY� � L L �S` \ 0: 9� QYU y ti> yt E N_ tiS f,r <r0 6✓r 6Y'J <ON 6w YrL •- c � r 40 Y ✓ �~ O H • f N aO A ID P M r .✓ r� E 0 �J d S { 1 a ? n •� -Y O i C 7 V V C L .i V 1'"I C S � y ,O I L O N ✓ S ✓ N C r N � FC 'IrLq Y ' C � G V Ci•n �' S aVJ _ v 4✓ V•°• i VCU p H- ~ V ✓ .°.. O V S u i� d i u' � � ✓ M L iC n� � O✓ -u O c NL o0 1 g w b <. �' m° 1 `_" °n u t a �� a ni.°•.. ° °..o y u � q'°�i `• L 1 � -� L l °_ j OY =Y° lV E✓ � L .V i.N. M V a VN .. •w J pO OTrLa .q c �L 4 O 0. °q • o= .wV ~VAA 4�A C � ✓ C. IV OL •L.r n_.Cr aV•.✓�C 9C G rn0 N S L ltl D _ IL 2 EYG O � n A O aV � O C � �9 T 1 r V C� r Y L M S N✓ .J > L •_ L 4 O ^ 0. ^^^JJJ Y J L ^l �•y � A C N q •, n C 6 °� ,L�4 V L9 O C_LYPJOV Y'> j✓O .•9 LLA AL `O 110 9 0.q 1 JiNC C J P !VC cVC rq N w 9>a Y•' > Ln ^AU�A� _ C � uN f •'..>- OL_ U V ✓ '•C G� L .`J M N> �7_ _> � � �� NA 6C =L O m °.°.. �= '•' � n< � f- E.•. oN m VLO v � C 2 y� y •c.ya ✓LL uVC NO •� � V � OV9 �'vT ^ D O o r V �• E C O r •� � Cy' r � WVU -` � IO V > In � c L fC' E u O L x _ v � i` ° y � G C r L_ 6 T� A n J Y d L_ O 2 O C y N •a r d � •°+ OL � O.C`O DLO LG .Vi .-• �I V u -Jad LN0. r✓ u Aq �•�• j I l A noN ✓ G L >I 6 > �' ^ O. P ^ + u L N A21/Vic yE V L N N 4 p l •dy M 9 C � n P= � O 9 2 � •� 4 .� � b N O N _ r .O LL i N y O O` 6r 9 °N C GqV C /C• GpC �9 4. Y' 6F fj H ( OLC LLU �L ✓ OBEE O _Lr F -d-- N y OC °j V V C INA VNd✓ >algJ NVn Sel L , ryO n L C � f( 6C� w.I yFCS V w= c y ? N Pu Y v .<� P S ccCO I [C 'J i r✓ O. �9 L` C V >a A C �O T V L p E _ VYG.r N�� <C Nr` OI ^_✓ =•1 � y✓O V.• GCCA rC r°'Cr� C`Cw L � E•Cn T^ JA_ VL .�F b`yp � G N =V Vv� OJVP NQ _ACDL Or `2 a� Nr� GIa <u m' o°�i re ¢I C n yL OV ����_u.T•� d ON FGL m c �<�I cf .`o na�V 2r rvn 1 o W _ o _G j V� L eN C'> _CU .4 9 •rte •LV•N 6 '^ EL `2 °_� y irVt�•LnC YOa, N e N= o•Y.•NJY O•W= it^ y iric oLn _o � -G anJ A A 9N _q _ei Nn�o• D S V i ce A� L N w P ° S � ' M i ^ Pr• q _✓ V C O N 6 y b 6� G •[ 9 Su •^ A «6 Q�r A� T_r O. Cu00r>^ C CJO LyC9 G0 Y .• A G Y° Nq VVLJV ANY 9 V9 N� ✓CIj VG ZGya�L L>aC ^y 2f T C C �° A dC P G C u �� M G C G> J_y r_ EuAa. C a"1p _ Yr 9 a� _q •`p, 49N EUN S ✓w tq Ar -�LLV D� y O 1 LV �� 6COC «� H_b d0 A LSVr v TVr VA 'WJ w0„Q ru �° � S u N CO �G LVW d` YN Hr. yC°•y otGOn OL P L w � D O N i �`> d O f S p L p✓ O r. _ Cw• V N VC L`•rN P�� � S.t'' L .• F V� >• L N« b D O � _ P N AN � GVDW C _i ^G CC1E$ S rL 9 ' Lc y�• -.F`C iLY iN ASV CaY OG✓= Ta •V• — k «O n� c' i =c�0 «ie yc Va L�CO�y>aOr �eL A �'^ c•L... �� � � °: LV " Gc o c Y e r. .e a c.L.• t M_c c�..Q a �-vn cA n° _ q�. acv W✓ Au 2mr� ✓'°' r °'Oi Ai rA >v> '- O v = �._.. o:o�me P•CS9✓ NY im.>.v c.>_ v c= eEV av < 9 i ! �0�6L Pi CGNy Y 9 E YA E ` V r _L2 y V w V rJ V M .C.. e° L l L O N . y Y •Ln V Gr O c N L+ i u..N• L Y o O ¢� �Y Y L C y _ L L VLO G G •� Z °I.a De N bE A✓ 09L�L90 O _C _N ar�Cj r ELy ' CG•r --r9 ly Y✓lQA Li O o Oar •„-y ^ Y C✓ VAANv AO� . rE O 9> c� y Oyu r OL VCC N�rVN 'w CV _• N V > HOLM S D P r l `O 6 V 0. g V O L >• 9_ r N° G Z LS. -S 6 G N•d• N CVSOq �iLr Y Nv G y n ✓O N V d V✓ � 6> ^ >N.Yi °� d _ d V <y ✓_� lCa a a�YU <VMY� ^ Mdd V r VN �� O u9N V� C••.4 C OY _ _q hL'LGrO•`J r C,� t SE✓ .SS r -LN CAA A �9 M r>� OT A [.D rC A�wO V • n Y�� q0 VIV L NV_G My S� Nom= V4CC «_YL VV A =rP O� rC 1 >� dd OT ` 2 C GO �NJ igZ Jay w• _ y Ca0 CCVn OA ✓`L j•. V O�O AY J'•.id>r'0.VC NAC L p= C P P b •` A w CI N` V G 2 < C✓ SIX C P C N d a� 9C V A �•. 6 P C A C J_ p L V r 0 < VOW 6 G O r>v Q�wC1 O>a '[S 09i LUVI E r r4A C >V COEF L� O� � a CI OL W Y V P✓ •..r O N •A V N < •Lw ST 6 9 � L � � � V >a '.wCN _ WWG F OC <�OC = E 0 �J C O . V 4 V P C N O C 9 v V V r P r = V l V L •_ � V O y�LV. V VO q0> ✓ �9� CDN �'tryv LVN yPOOq 3 >. N .-. �D LPC 9P C`L � yyi LYT p91P1 T .-1 �-� L � Nan •o S P V C T = un� o �_ yri o wce os= .°re �•_ r:J ° °rc c.G. N `Ly�� L � s� VVC 4 .T >Lr p V✓.N ^ LNgC uu+ EVi r-iumT r C .0 !' 6 l Cqr q C -• � y O� n r q Lq qL°. 06Cd Cn CMN OVm .qi. ON6 gOEn -rS h�N °T L �I l � 'JTr � C� O.[ >.0 -•• �L C C N V Nd62 O Vp 1l � ,r J yy�w•�y� + 'f y N C + L= y D O^ O` r L V ` O L C ] O• C L I r qS 9u a�'•L- O oyC 9L✓ Cu =lam _r0 Vd.JCU p� O• 2 LCC O' V aq -`N ♦ q +. 9 - V./`. 4- q r N ^ 000 V q pCW u u C � r+ O. q G b l ✓ C V C O� y � n N L O V T F_ N.. q N C �� V 4' V `�` �_ I•L V � N r q0 G, _ D O L q V✓ l ` Y� O p U L L N � _ Qi ✓ q° q _ N . CPb g0 era = yRP`O N4N iLVOL' vim' XNl�q L"T tOI dq L `O - Gq ^ n -E NG N �C �O� E6oy T NC 410 a`�rC ci O ✓eu o -�., �yv r L D� �r gnu0i } Gl•.O. E N PINS qrq � ^dL C �I 1 p pAp q i �4>. n ^q uy 6Nr p yyq qOC OVr�> °•>O YL r°.�L SI Y aN qq q ] � 1 9yL rqP qr L N ` 1Y✓ C � P_. W ad � I C V -D nq L -nq yV L paw° = Cq q9 9i6O y qYT SW'`Tr 6q �_ Ll I V j I b0� �VPL Lr l C� nON Ly ap oC.V LVq P�yb �- q r� N � iG OV +P nV ��' rV� �^ l Vp N.Dn90 C rNN - 013 1p 9 q r9Q6 r4 Om +�> a=i NOS 6�i OGy6 `r nv 6N0 >.-nb V }' qT Z« qr N9 .j l.J q J pi Y 4 l0 6 ul Vmr V 6N 6q ,-•V' w t q D V 9 V N.. N 00 On i 1 I V <q I 60� C 6+ Nr LUOC D 6 O -q� d.V. Pf.Y u6u q q N p �.O 9 --L Lp �O^ v -7 �Sp •G-pcE 7.-C O d- 6 ^_♦ 7r G^ - C'-.+ CC-- V V9pN d`L r 'q ✓q C � " •O +r Z r„N 3 ^ iV � o . C . °l n . .2 °l : io 13 C i P O p � T N n �ar N T - °qnpu1 _g r ' .LNa.S O V N P Pc v L4 EA i o c V o Oe✓ iiyl �sR� m ^ irO =4b y L w_ _ •-r_ c =l C NVLN p +9V W yYC V nV {., Y O p N C -a- = pp iF q .^ C r 12 C A a 9 1VLDr Vy V= yd °V Cggq..VgN _Oq! Vr4 Vq�CL FbadTn � ri 9 P C' r0 ° � ✓cq 'E`.L. .ci _L. ro C5 .2 Pp = �: ✓ a`L3 zc'.oN z N u o 9q =c L..., r gggC 6r NLy Lrp V• rOL n V y V Vy61 W 9T +V Cry _C C. VW P q qq l V+ Y` 4✓ uN V i'r9 .V VLF Cq q= G N`Q q LW _ 9xLq qrr ONU° L q 9} i G 6 -� O C N N Ol VV +y V9+ G � -q t$J. q90 g5, py Ou Ji[V OO �iy ^ Yp V° jV �y V6V NV PGP r _+` O V rPN Ly O. YEJ .dP ✓FFd -O V ~ 99 pG g0 -V �iV NN >.6__C 9G�]•. O yL m yCV Vim^ GCy V. Cpl v w C -Y g y' p.r N07 ' +tom P O qAq N Vrq VY VPiy O V 9 OJ q=LU O N -E N D nN i�r 6C tr Y j �P pM y-J NL°J y 9L`�eV V qDq rV. °O N EO y� J dwy- G,� OV p9 LC na STM -'+� Lp ✓yOP yC S�q p V-. O .- Vm L COi'. +. 6 Cr O 9 9 - VN n +O Cp � �O + G Sr.• �°- a��e^ aggi N p �� �+ + O Ly'U L yp d L Vr _�N N V GC OO--99 4 D qC' V .�-V^ °CV Jq _qr Vp ¢ ^qS ryl ^y ^ iCrMJy °I CUy va°V.jN OLON F•O r✓ O�G:dr D q L rC -_ V __O y`✓ CO + 9 eoV jtr _ OCV V+ yq t q' CiyC SNNPV DL'. •iL N C+ ry Cb r N O J C9au V C ✓N � N � O rL q0'-Y r- zy V CL66 NY`r✓ yl O�yN S V F q Vy q V N- V L° u u Y a O �• 9 y 4 �cG r J:.._ O L L° -• L y C P 6- C � r• S y� J r r N 4 y 0 C p y C y C p CWF.. p 4r yp9 ^./y NrN 6q Vq a9 O ^Jq yap ° Y ^'c✓{i y�E'P q Pa C`Y 4I L PL ^_ydt L VDL Vy� L O•_N r0g J C q`.7 V r n r.°r60 __iy .' �.j Vq .O. r. P -Dy�LV VN �O yCO= �SdV _ 4�.• -_i y7 3L ..V- -4 �Y irV ` DE [L•`S N N••C- NV Lllr pLL `>.Vp �NCC �VGL G.L Nw LC YV V> Ly VdL dEpp nC <00 O OC rC LOgSG -.0 DVC ^ +_ irr N�•n• O M•G70 6 l LJV LO 6ppDV N �V � ~V 2 Y N O �y-[O \I \JL11� P pV Y uJJ•]] N n f N C M L N 11 r V.' �A' C'•I 1 4 c 6 < r O 3 O r O Y V b C U r e Y V T b O ✓ _ - `u q L 6 y •N. {I P � aqs• r c n 1 I . u N � � G crg L d O •G.r _ L V •/1 E V V .°.. NEpL C J � � C .°. N✓ `• � « b CO•eY L C � « p O N V I 6✓ P O V C✓ y N O Z y O N b O O y ^ L C L r W LQ! a tidy « M o G W ��OV • 9 Urp t - N p `: n � L V C � O A 1•L. = a Q C CN T ``a• 6 N C nv « •^b J ✓ P O r a o C i L V L C L P .'.�L'r• Y d _ O• i VPLC � -° W j V r ' i C N vs( V qqO ^O c' Lr '3 C LV p J•� r r Z l b 9C V C 9 a• d .L• �•.T, n= C L � O CPC .°+ L Yn y I b^ TV w d T w_�i 4 O _.r a^ C [ Nb a V L C✓ _Y �• C °✓ y n-. C _✓ Z .• awi b G aVi J LI U p C A_ C q A T w J_ � qp� � d. �� bL- V L pp V ✓ C Y V EU N d b O GP i b Y U .O q •r Wv 2 U c u G ✓ •s CC{V ^^ 4 °u Ln PV q T a L Vw u `V N � ✓ P c Q O 'a be c . c Y � V•�r• 1 1 0 •� .e. fOG q b V OL � ✓W L V uJ•r «G Y V < r O 3 O r O Y V b C U r O C u c Q4 N l n 6 P r r O U r J v r .d.. V _ Y V a b O ✓ V q L 6 y -t {I P � a r w 1 I . u r r J crg L d O -o I ° V V .°.. NEpL C J � � C .°. N✓ `• � « b CO•eY L C � « p O N V I 6✓ P O V C✓ 3 y C••'b0 9 n r q L r W LQ! a tidy « M o G W ��OV • M J, C b p `: n N V 10 L.� d_ i L _ "oa Z Q M CN T ``a• 6 N C nv « •^b U. OY P O r a o _ uc 1� GN]1 .'.�L'r• Y .°. VPLC O P 4 j O V• ' i C N vs( V qqO ^O ✓ J '3 C LV p J•� r r b L d 2✓ 9C V Lpp C O'�a_ L L d .L• �•.T, n= C L � O CPC + L Yn y I b^ TV w d T w_�i 4 O _.r a^ C [ Nb a V L C✓ _Y �• C °✓ CC y nw•Ow a JY « U p C A_ C q A T w J_ � qp� � d. �� bL- V L pp V ✓ C Y V EU V d b y � i b Y U .O q •r Wv 2 U M y y u _b ✓ •s CC{V ^^ 4 °u Ln PV q T a L Vw u `V N � ✓ P c Q O 'a be c . c Y � V•�r• q pu u� .e. fOG q b V OL � ✓W L V uJ•r «G r V NU VA N L r ` C ^A � Y 9 V o •ri• � T bPN A „ u� cbbc n� n ` aw. � a I e� gi•i bu N L V C V.+ 6q 90 rS a0 ✓a a 1 <C WZ oG IJ aOi �L ��e LL C6 wl .. Pi Vm u_ 7 1 P •r t a Y b M p N_ � _� L y q d • A✓ Ni M� V VrjA y Or N �•° Lp MO V Y wp O ✓O Ci n rd ✓O v. C ✓O C`A +C NV •OP 0 n O 2 W r_ H. � w 0 � P r 9 b • r C i0i V L« � W J nbn n u � uL vb.n vv � �i •T•� °�• 84 O`O Wl �Y Vn_V r J L>,u obi �� +) _n••• L ✓ 1 p L n VV• g• J O C u c Q4 N l n 6 P r r O U r J v r .d.. V _ Y V b O ✓ V L 6 -t {I � a r w 1 I . � 6 _Q r -o u� ° N �Y C_ Gam+ NEpL C J � � C ��Cn OMW j `• � « b CO•eY L C � « p O N V I 6✓ P O V C✓ 3 y C••'b0 9 n r q L r W LQ! a tidy « M o G W ��OV • M J, C b G 10 L.� d_ ;•" _ "oa Z d� M C nv « •^b an V g OY d LLO° a o _ uc GN]1 .'.�L'r• Y .°. VPLC >LC b � ONtY y r � Y V« Y C J ✓ J V J n C LV p r L e .L• N •Vu C°pCI� N _� O C T w_�i 4 V Z O O 9 C J i L •r. V a �o �a T e � nw•Ow a JY « •a � C TA r0 chi qp� Y C W^ 4 bL- N O pp V ✓ C Y V EU V d b y � i b Y U .O q •r Wv 2 U M y y u _b ✓ •s CC{V ^^ 4 °u Ln PV q T a L Vw u `V Q O 'a OYN Ii _W U� NI yL q0 N� pM dO�OM fOG OL P n= nN C � «G N' V L r ` C c b � Y 9 V o •ri• � T bPN A „ u� v.�'n q Na �I .• NV�c« NOOr w N L V C V.+ 6q tV 6_ W .`.r � 4 ✓ <C WZ LI IJ aOi �L b Z C6 wl 1 O C u c Q4 N l n 6 P r r O U r J v r .d.. V _ N ri J Y O b O ✓ V 6 ( {I � a r w 1 I . � 6 _Q r -o u� ° N �Y C_ Gam+ NEpL C J � ��Cn OMW j � « CO•eY C � « p O N V I 6✓ P O V C✓ 3 y C••'b0 ��+ 4eEw GCl r W LQ! CL V� tidy « M •�R PV W ��OV • M J, C N ri J 0 P � 0 ✓ C r r Cdr+ V M C •W q O T C A u _ C •q• N a� W C C o� e L Y L N HY C L O o`O V q J w 0 Y b < ✓ V NG ✓ a r w . •. r u� ° �Y C_ Gam+ NEpL C A i •°. .vim C ��Cn OMW j � « CO•eY f V ¢- y P « p O N V P � 6✓ P O V C✓ y C••'b0 ��+ 4eEw GCl r _P LQ! CL V� tidy « M •�R PV PO4 ��OV • J, C Y 10 L.� e LLO° a o J�•c uc GN]1 .'.�L'r• Y .°. VPLC >LC b � ONtY y r � Y V« Y C J ✓ J C°pCI� 1 4Gr w_�i Cq AO VwY `�.$ L •r. V �� LSV NW T e � nw•Ow a JY « q✓.nP G G u0 chi Pa V6 C W^ 4 bL- N O V ✓ C Y V EU Y_ y .O q •r b ^q JIVO CC{V ^^ 6�6b PV q L 0p 6 u cO i ✓� N Q O 'a OYN Ii _W U� id yL �w..iG qr` pM +G` P n= nN C ArJ J «G N' V 9 bPN E L NOOr w N L V NC�p� tV 6_ W .`.r � 4 ✓ Y 0 P � 0 ✓ C r r Cdr+ V M C •W q O T C A u _ C •q• N a� W C C o� e L Y L N HY C L O o`O V q J w 0 72 E e Z L s O L .T G V Ca u q O L L O m Li o p v g�oE Oor ra �r p q C O y x Y p y — p CVO G yQV` =n G q � � w x q dx L � 6 x p v y O y V L — x�4e_= dor C v 4 M1 q f P O L pE L C N VLi� COD C Y 4 C T 'I C+ L y L� Y� NL O. «90r Op uC t W G L L L'u C N .Lr L _ VL•OG Ln PV � d `qL 6 V os _hd pppGgi C i q enO y u l� q 1 C e Z L s O L .T G V Ca u q O L L O m Li o LO q Y p y CVO G rl QL� G q � � x q dx 6 C f p r y L q a « C v M1 q ( � pE L C G Y O 1l L y L� Y� NL `qr os _hd pppGgi L L_ q enO y u l� C >�OT «qV q CC q Y d g 4 4 w 4 P q a V 6 L 4 q p— q V n y b G 4 ✓,qn tl d nOQ1' At y' du q0 Lq t L «b� pyyi r LO 11 u lu CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 14, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Enn,n �r BY: Bartzra i:rall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7350 - RANCHO LAND COMPANY A divan o 10 acres into 2 parcels within an in ustria area located at the southwest corner of 6th and Utica Streets - APN 210 - 021 -"07 INTRODUCTION: This subdivision consists of 10 acres within the M -2 zone and is being divided into 2 parcels of the same approximate size. The site is loca- ted within sub -area 6 of the Industrial Specific Plan, which calls for lot areas of one acre or larger. The surrounding area is zoned for industrial park usage. To the north a facility for Coca Cola is being constructed at this time; to the south, east and west is vacant land. Sixth Street will be built as a part of the Industrial Assessment District, satisfying the requirement for construction for final map approval. The interior streets will be constructed at time of development of the parcels. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part. I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist and has conducted a field investigation. Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the environ- ment as a result of the proposed subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the tentative mad be approved, subject to the City Engineer's Report and that a N^"gative Declaration be issued. A resolution is attached to provide for approval should the Commission concur. lly sybmitted, /, EK: Attachments ITEM 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S DEPORT' FILED BY: Rancho Land Co. TENTATIVE MAP NO. LOCATION:_$outhwest .)rner of 6th Street and DATE FILED:_ i/10/82 Utica StrF --t _ HUMBER OF LOTS: 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Division of the East 1/2 of s_ot 2n pEC�ifl rvur113ER: in Sprtion 13, T_ 1_S._R.i W. Map of_Cucamon ^,a FEE: 5273.00 Fruit lands. •ecorded in Book 4 Page S ZONE: M -2 7350 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * .._ k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TE: "2TAT1VF MAP PREPARED „: Associated Engineers GROSS ACREAGE ADDRESS: 315 East "E" Street MINIMUM LOT AREA: 8.42 Qntarig, CA 91764 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4D RECORD OWNER(Sj ADDRESS EhONE f Ranrho Land Co. 7661 Densmore Avenue 213/ 94 -5656 Van Nuys, CA 91406 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications Irreyocalbe offer of X_ 1.V. Dedication by finai map of all interior street rights -of -way and all ,Ie,essary easements as shown on the tentative map. x_ 2. Dedication, by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the f,illcwiug streets: 30 additional feet on 6tn Street additional feet on additional feet on _ _ X Corner P/L radius requiredldh to be dedicated Other 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: _ 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Plaster Plan of Streets revision required for: 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: ;: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP N0. 7350 Page 2 Improvements !Bending is required prior to Recording for 6th Street Building permit for others 1 7. Construct full street improvement.: (inclu'ag curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive 'Ppi-Vdcn per 'ot, parkway trees and street lights) on all ifiLerior streets. X 8. Construct the following missing nprovements on the following streets: * includino landcraninn and irrim tiny nn ,,o +.. X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. _x 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, elECtric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to be underground. x 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X_ 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- t'.ons anti types approved by the City Engineer. x 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. _ X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. _ X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underqround service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The rollowing specific dimensions, 1.e., cul -de -sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: 18. The following existing streets are substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees _ 19. This subdivision shall be sub -iazt to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ San Bernardino County Flood Control Di;:trik.t. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements o that may be received from them. RCE 20 CURB & A.C. SIDE- DRI"E STREET STREET MEDIAN STREET NAN-E CUTTER PUM . IdALK APPR. TREES LIGHTS IS=_AND* OTHER *h tr:et�- X X X X 1 X X See s46 UtiGs' Street X X X X X X I L-Ur:iawed TX X. X X X X -i X X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. _x 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, elECtric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to be underground. x 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X_ 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- t'.ons anti types approved by the City Engineer. x 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. _ X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. _ X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underqround service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The rollowing specific dimensions, 1.e., cul -de -sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: 18. The following existing streets are substandard: They will require: Approvals and Fees _ 19. This subdivision shall be sub -iazt to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ San Bernardino County Flood Control Di;:trik.t. X 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements o that may be received from them. RCE 20 TEPITA'TvE M ",P :D- Page 3 x_21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. 6. _ C. D. E. F. Caltrans, for:_ City: County Dist Abatement District:, D.I.S. Trenching PerTait if any t Cucamonga County Water District: Other: are over b' deep: - p Control _ 22. if only a portion of th- ;s Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on t;.e final map: �- 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way 1,ne 3 -- nr accord- ance with the City o7 Rancho Cucamonga standards. _ 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located _ 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map reeds c a ification as follows: 27. The border shall be showy. to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or titla explanation required. Parcel Map 6:aiver _ 28. Information submitted at tree time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to 'i Recording for ) 0 Building permit for_ ) 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance ho. 24. _ 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Sudi flew may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. it water surface is above *_op of curb, 30" walls shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. _ 32. Cuiverts required to be constructed across streets at followirg 1.-cate ^ns:_ 33. Broad scaie hydrologic studies will a required to assess impact tor increased runoff. X 34. Private drainage easements for cross lot drainage shall be required and delineated on the final map. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. _.360 Page 4 Miscellaneous X_ 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. _ 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. __37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require ann,�-rati on. 38. All information, required to be shown on the tentative map is rot shown as re- quired: 39. Proper grading and erosion contro , inc;ud ng the prcventat»n of sedimenta- tion or damage to offsite property shall be provides for as required. _ 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow - ;ng reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. X 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said cert-fication is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the de*_e` nation, in accordance with Section 66436(0)!1) Cf the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or Parma^ - ture of an such - =� =a the sign Aft public entity or m�t,i: may be omitted from tha finae map unless the ri *;• =- :.;, :ea in writing of any objection to slid deta -wina- `_:p.-n -rizmn the specified time limits of said Section. X 43. At the time of Final ?dap submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of rocC"ued maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing origin?1 lard division, tie note> and bench marks referenced. ' -44. Development shall be - ;imited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive aooroaches at lot line X 45. Improvement certificate for the construction of impr0ements on streets of5fered for dedication shall be noticed on final map. X 46. Improvement work on 6th Street shall be coordinated with the Assessment Distri,:t's work. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOr A LLOYD R. HUBBS CITY ENGINE*ER is By: RCE 20 E 0 0 OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION VICINITY MAP tide, arcel Map 7350 - � i 1 . ... _ ,' • -' I 11+1V _.till Y L^ : Sao 11 r OF / rc¢•Ts PARCEL MAP NO - -7350 y IN Inc C"T O' RANCHO 'OCA•IOROA As%)cvA%F0l lTR6T BEING A DIVISION OF THE JEAST v2 OF LOT 20 M SECT1ppt. 13. -- ` art JA T IF �• T. ! $ , R.7 W- NAF OF COCAN )NGA FRIFT IJINBS• AS RECORCM IN �•A• •AM• GOON 4, RIGE 9 OF TIE RECWOS OF T11E LOtNTT IOF SW KM&ARVM2. I STATE X CALIFORK14. AM waeA - Am 5w 440,A'! w RFY Lvxlvl e /rT a eel - MRV ALIF, G f4GG M A 1 GCaIS AV 0 3 /XT, —I I P I _ � I 4 1 i I' i tllCpg7T : aJ1'• . i _ i ��� Rr r•I' srbw.p...y L,.n,. -.ws .» •.�- l ..fc.T- I — - 1' .*...-. I t Z �Y YGr•rev I1 z IO wl:+ns I - A'Clr•} ors zl.tvmiT '� 4 { �'x, �' i� ✓IeZ 1pprj a/7/IUrE RJA' LL'. w ti i<1 gu Ih2 �e,'p � -- d �� •S' EI'wtoaAt AA'r�T,AL 1'1aL£'S �•I to a o tt X �' i � wv�.aoiwu �iet — a iL ' /s.r __ ....� • ._ Ace- JJN t a . w • FAVeFw(O I ZZ ��� NCJ•.FfATw � +SfSI y�T —�. 3+N 6EfH+CDIA!'J AYL7WYC 7 •�U - G1)' A tilAwr fY •bS � JJSIl1. ' F I LnuriES F•ro.raRlE serrrie- .s IlKfvwFwefr: i (sK+�' TjV GWM)- IIb1C' G•Y. It- A& l2l.Ij.,NF 95;05 .111h 3AV N 1S)11• •Jn!Tr $C . iinY�OnIR !O //fiP9MI i A711•E,r' ipnow 1101TYmIp l! '9 zlra lk. Ti.rgNS•.•• G. ' 4 m s awgg r .x.c +al.ls aw•.+... — . —I I P I _ � I 4 1 i I' i tllCpg7T : aJ1'• . i _ i