No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/09/08 - Agenda PacketU 1 1 J 1 f l P � •.; r ♦ e 1. i R • U 1 1 J 1 f l P I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2kNNI41% C01Tv LMJSSJ0jN4T AGENDA WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 8, 1982 7:00 P.M. LION °S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER A C T I O N 9161 BASE LINE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledae of Allaniarra II. Roll Call Commissioner Barker X Commissioner Rempel X Commissioner King X Co=issioner Stout X Commissioner McNiel X IiI- Approval of Minutes August -11T -1982- (Minutes were not presented) IV. Announcements V- Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at ore time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be rem,2ved for discussion. * A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved 5 -0 -0 82-14 - HOFGAARDEN - The deve opment of a 20,378 square foct building on approximately 1 -25 acres of land in the General Industrial %Rail Served category (Subarea 5) located east of Cottage Avenue, south of 8th :- APX 209 - 193 -07. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 5733 - McNAY * This project falls within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Area. Planning Commission Agenda September 8, 1982 Page 2 VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion oz the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the commission from the t sb? I c m* crophone bu giv; ng y_= .— ..nd add ----. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Approved 5 -0 -0 C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 82 -02 - BROWNE - A change of zone from A- _ Limited Agricultural) to R -1 (Single Family Residential) for .96 acres of land located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Ivy Lane - APN 1077- 071 -01. Continued. Applicant will D. attempt change to parcel di- vision and this will be re- advertised. E. onvro�� - n rt�rucrr .rar into to 3 lots located on Base Line and Ivy Lane APN 1077- 071 -01. subaivls-ion of .yb acres the southwest corner of in the A -1 zone (R -1 pending) - Approved 4 -1 -0 with condi- MORGAN - A residential subdivision of 1.42 acres tion that applicant meet into parcels located southeast of Hillside with Staff and Trail Comm. Road, approximately 1361` west of Beryl. to assure continuity of trail system. F.. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT Approved 5 -0 -0 with "condition 10414 - LANDCO - A proposed custom lot subdivision that sidewalk requirement come of 1 acre s of land in the R- 1- 20,000 zone into from systems deveiopment fee. 17 lots located south of Carrari, west of Haven Avenue - APN 201-101 -17. Approved 5 -0 -0 with amend- G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -16 - WALL - The estab- ment to hours of operation lishment of an arcade in the C -1 -5 zone to be ending at 11 p.m. located at 9687 Base Line in the Base Line Village Shopping Center. Approved 5 -0 -0 with amend- H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -17 - CHAFFEY COLLEGE - ment limiting parking to The establishment of an 8,518 square root vocati students. trade school for the handicapped in the General Industrial category to be located at 9375 9th Street and 8732 Helms Avenue - APN 209 -031 -56. I n ykr Planning Commission Agenda September 8. 1982 Page 2 Continued to 10- 13 -82. I ENVIRONMEIGAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 82 -04 - An amendment to Section 6 9 (2 W to provide for encroachment of structures into the required rear yard, subject to not exceeding a certain percentage coverage of the rear yard area. VII. Old 8usines- Approved 5 -0 -0 J. HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES VIII. Director's Reports To be held on 9/11/82. K. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN UPDATE IX. Public Conments This is the time and place for the general public tc address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do rot already appear on this agenda. To Workshop, X. Adjournment 9/18/82 at Lions Park Conn. Center. The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative at 9 a.m. Regulations that set an II p.m. adjournment time. if items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. c 6t.4:� I I � v CITY OF XI RAN(3iO� C� (U�CA(�MONG {/A�� 2 �' • �� � O APLI[/},,�/A-� PLANNING V� I G C Vl`i�ll�r �� - ' 101 �T D L GENL X WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 8, 1982 7:00 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,.RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA i. Piedge of Aliegiaoce II. Roll Call Commissioner Barker Commissioner King Commissioner McNiel III. Approval of Minutes August 11, 1982 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout The follow --:n9, Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one t±zw without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. * A. 82 -14 - HDFGAARDEN - The development of a zu,-lb square re foot b—u-79 ng on approximately 1 .25 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5) located east ^f Cottage Avenue, south of 8th - APN 209- 193 -07. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 5733 - Nn.NAY * This project falls within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Area. x11 ,... ..... i. Piedge of Aliegiaoce II. Roll Call Commissioner Barker Commissioner King Commissioner McNiel III. Approval of Minutes August 11, 1982 IV. Announcements V. Consent Calendar Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout The follow --:n9, Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non - controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one t±zw without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. * A. 82 -14 - HDFGAARDEN - The development of a zu,-lb square re foot b—u-79 ng on approximately 1 .25 acres of land in the General Industrial /Rail Served category (Subarea 5) located east ^f Cottage Avenue, south of 8th - APN 209- 193 -07. B. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 5733 - Nn.NAY * This project falls within the boundaries of the Redevelopment Area. Planning Commission Agenda September 8, 1982 Page 2 VI. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. PIease wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Comaj.ssion from the public ac .,ro har_e by g;74 :g your tare and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. C. BRO:NE - A change of zone from A -1 Limited Agricu ?tural) to R -1 (Single Family P.esidertial) for .96 acres of land located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Ivy Lane - APN 1077- 071 -01. - y D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7511 - BROWNE - A rtisidential subdivision of .96 acres into 3 lots located on the southwest corner of Base Line and Ivy Lane in the A -1 zone (R -1 pending) - APN 1077- 071 -01. E. ENVIRONMXNTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7646 - MORGAN - A residential subdivision of 1.42 acres Into parcels located southeast of Hillside Road, approximately 1361' west of Beryl. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 10414 - LANDCO - A proposed custan iot subdivision of 10 = acres of land in the R- 1- 20,000 zone into 17 lots located south of Cerrari, west of Haven Avenue - APN 201 - 101 -17. G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMiT 82 -76 - WALL - The estab- lishment of an arcade in the C -1 -5 zone to be located at 9687 Base Line in the Base Line Village Shopping Center. H. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -17 - CHAFFEY COLLEGE - The esta ent of an 8, 8 square oot vocat� trade school for the handicapped in the General Industrial category to be located at 9375 9th Street and 8732 Helms Avenue - APN 209- 031 -56. lei— I k 1 Planning C v wission Agenda September 8, 1982 Page 2 i. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING I1EtDINHNLt AMENDMENT 82 -04 - An amendment, to Section 6 .0 h j(BT to provide for encroachment of structures into the required r ^ar yard, subject to not exceeding a certain percentage coverage of the rear yard area. VII. Old Business J. HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES VIII. Director's Reports K. ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN 'UPDATE ,I•t, Publ i:: Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Co=ission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. X. Adjournment ;t j,; The planning Co=issicn ilas adopted Adatnistrative Regulations that set an 11 p.m- adjournment time. if items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. - • y MARIO IM T(RtATIOR1l �ffl' . 1 ¢ 7• �. � C I ' ! 1 1� �y i'. MINUTES TO BE ATTACHED PRIOR �I� L 11 E-1 DATE : Tn: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CL7,�AA90NGA SAYr P%_E4 POPX September 8, 1982 Mlembers of the Planning Commission Rick Gomez, City Planner Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner approximately 1.25 acres of Served category (Subarea 5) Avenue, south of haven - APN of a zu'J/ land in th e located on 209- 193 -07. 1977 REVIEW 82 -14 8 square foot building on General Industrial /Rail the east side of Cottage PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTi7N: The Applicant is requesting review and approval of a 20,378 square foot industrial building on approximately 1.25 acres of land. The project is before the Planning Commission for environmental clearance only. The site plan and elevations will be approved by the City Planner at a later date. The project site is a portion of a 5.85 acre industrial park which has three existing buildings, as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B ". There are no trees on the site and the ground cover consists of indigenous weeds. The site has a slight slope to the south of approximately 1 %. The development plans were reviewed by the Design and Development Review Committees and revisions were required prior to approval of the site plan and elevations. The revisions are minor in nature and will not affect the envircnmental determination.. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the app icant and is attached for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. ITEM A DR 82- 14 /Hofgaarden Planning Commission Agenda September 8, 1982 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Based upon a site analysis and review of the Initial Study, it appears that the project will not cause significant theissuance of as tNegative environment. If the Commission conCars, Declaration for the project would be in order. lly submitted, RICKI GDMEZ, City Planner RG:CJ:jr `® Attachments: Exhibit "P." - Location Maps Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan Initial Study, Part I E L 11 11 I � Y .i r�i�arG vE w I �� vrnwp 7vla.ro G' I 11 �� s: av�var .c . nw •awe, as I I I � r�i�arG vE . eca -�• «.� I 11 �� s: av�var .c . nw •awe, as I I I ' mawaa�a r�i�arG vE . eca -�• «.� I 11 �� s: av�var .c . nw •awe, as I � ax�MO o4�. ^, .rrrtY .:,yCMS Z�TOC<— ' mawaa�a r�i�arG vE �� s: av�var .c . nw •awe, as I � ax�MO o4�. ^, .rrrtY .:,yCMS 1L061r. WOIO. " 11 // LA 11 Ott 1 11 —•- �' rl,/wuW J Y v NORTH CITY OF ITF-M: 'A' � '- -ly' ® RAtiCHO CUC NNIO \GA TrrLE: -,��� PLANNING DIVISION EYHiBrr. W SC:ALE:��"I5��__ r LOCI rc + b (1 axtorv' N Q --�I i Q .T i ACACkA VIGit�t!TY Mtat? r.%41'. , 11W. !2.1 Alm— :)W STRCCT IO U OI0li) OG" Ct y I E � 1 � 6 e • r 3 _ p1A i p .5 •ZM\' I .e NORTH CITY O RANCHO CUCAjXj0.XGA PLANNING DIVLa'N ITEM: TITLE: EXmBrr- --A— SCALc- 1-T.5. Ll : =l r E CIT"i OF RANCHO CUMIONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT I2:FORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environ..ental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this fora: must be completed and submitted to the Development Review CciacuiLLwe Lh_rui4Lja Lht: t t iparl iEzt!nL where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environzner_tal Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard.. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the pronosed project. PROJECT TITLE: 1rAIDU<TR /,l 15tZm PIAL� APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: ; 1 S — Akf -.S-Z `f7 _ /_' V 4& EeZA!41717i /V'� 711 W r//I Z_ mp _ NAME, ADDRESS, TFLEPHOIvi OF PERSON TO EE CC1 ACTT= CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: c IACATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) no 7-71e F gtA yz! ' JUST 5oL!rN LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: fQ?,4f TS jTCg�Jr' ?CO 3 V C' 17-V D/= 1 -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: TA,'PilSTof%A 1_ 3Ur4 . /.,vim Op Sk. /r T' ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF AMY: ,f AcFZ ¢ 3CXI STzA/ .qr+/L ?>i l✓r c /-7- O-n t? 3 ( e-v-r /t� Sys d5= _ DESCRIBE T14E ENVIRONKENTAL SETTING OF THE PRO,-)ECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNMING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): 5'41Gff7- SL,t PE ?D Tlfr-- Sc±y; /. 77'/5 s+ _Aigg 13 1 n [ F Af/C6 b e,&. rr h' . W i Tll ti s r°R, A ftt r- Go PNCJpS Is the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental Lmpacta a- 2 WILL THIS PROJECT: Create a substantial change in ground contours? Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? Create a substantial change in demar_d for municipal services (police, firms, ester sewage, etc.)! Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? Remcve any existing trees? How many? Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of anv YES answers above: IMPORT '1 : If the prcject involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page- CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information recuired for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief_ I further understand t}a t additicnal information may be required to be submitted before an ad-�auate evaulation can be made by the Development Review Co:m••,ittee. Date_ Signature Title„ _ 0 Ll rI CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 8, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION REQUEST FOR PARCEL MAP 5733 - MCNAY Parcel Map 5733 is the division of 6.77 acres into 2 parcels located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue approximately 694 feet south of Victoria Avenue within the Etiwanda Specific Plan Area. This map was originally approved by the City Engineer on March 17, 1980 and was extended on October 14, 1981 fora period of one year. Since the Etiwanda Specific Plan is not get approved, Betty McNay is requesting an additional six months extension. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Pianning Commission adopt the attached resolution extending tentative approval for Parcel Map 5733 to March 17, 1983_ Respectfully submitted, Attachments: Map Resolution ITEM 6 29, i Al .I witless s A 1 a i i > 1 T _ �_�•� .^'TOT �_ �L� v I i \ b t 4 Yn rJ I � Ids y it i'r •. a _ i 11 zb2Z � 7 ayZ�n 1 t cl n dye � 2 i a y C LOCI WOOD ENGII+IEERING $ SURVEYING COMPANY, INC. i! iz U August 30, 1982 Lloyd B. Nubbs, City Engineer City of Rancho Cucamonga P'. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 RE: Parcel Map 5733 I am requesting a 6 -month extension of time for Parcel Map 5733. This is a division of 6.7 acres into 2 parcels and is located on the east side of Etiwanda Avenue approximately 694 feet south of Victoria Avenue within the Etiwanda Specific Plan Area. Since the Etiwanda Specific Plan is not yet approved, this additional time is being requested with the consultation of the staff. Cordially, 1 j Betty McNay BM: jaa 0 RESOLM ON NO.* A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE EXTENSIONS FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 5733 WHEREAS, an application has been filed for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.2(b) of Ordinance 28 -B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission ii?s held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above - described tentative Parcel Map SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a lack of financing and high interest rates for construction; S. That these economic conditions make it unreasonable to build at this time; C. That external physical conditions have caused delay in the start of construction; D. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would n& be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordin,..,ce; E. That the granting of said time extensions will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for the above- described project as follows: Parcel Mao Expiration Date 5733 March 17, 1983 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman Resoiution No. Page 2 ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, .TACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adnnted h� tho osa.ni__ City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September, 1982, by the followiro vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 11 C C= OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September B, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE C A change of zone from A -1 (Limited Family Residential) for .96 acres e southwest corner of Base Line Road 01. Related File: Parcel Map 7511 19: . HANGS NO. 82 -02 - BROWNE- Agriculturai to R- Single f land located on the and Ivy Lane - APN 1077 -071- SITE DESCRIPTION: This request for the change of zone is in conjunction with a subdivision of 3 single family lots on approximately i acre of land located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Ivy Lane (Exhibits "A" and "B "). The development proposal consists of Parcel Map 7511, which is also on the agenda for your review and consideration. A description of the project is provided in the Parcel Map Staff Report. Zoning on the subject property is currently A -1 (Limited Agricultural). Exhibit "C" illustrates that the surrounding property to the east and west is zoned R -1, to the north R -3, and to the south, A -1. The General Plan designates all surrounding property on the south side of Base Line, Low Density Residential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). Surrounding property on the north side of Base Lire Road is designated Low Medium Density Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) and Low Density Resi- dential (2 -4 dwelling units per acre). The proposed density of Parcel Map 7511 is approximately 3 units per acre. ANALYSIS: The purpose of the A -1 district is to protect and encourage agricultural uses in areas which are not appropriate for urban development. The minimum parcel size for A -1 property is 1 acre. Parcel Map 7511 proposes 3 residential lots less than 1 acre and ranging in size from 8846 square feet to 15,463 square feet. The change of zone to R -1 will allow lot sizes as proposed on the Parcel Map. The residential sub- divisions to the east and west have been deveioped with a minimum lot size of approximately 7200 square feet. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is provided for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and has found no adverse impacts on the environment as the result of this zone change. If the ITEM C l Environmental Assessment and Zone Change No. 82 -02 - Browne Planning Commission Agenda August 25, 1982 Page 2 Cormission concurs with such findings, recommendation for issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. FACTS FOR FINDING: The subject site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed lot size. The change of zone is consistent with the General Plan and the corresponding Parcel Map has a density within the range allowed. Approval of this zone change will not create adverse impacts on the surrounding properties. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, and 38 property owners within 300 feet of the subject site have been notified. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this zone change. RECOWENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements relative to this project. If, after such con- sideration the Comrission can support the findings, then adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Respe tfully submitted, t RICK GO�E.Z City Planner RG: CJ: kap Atiachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Parcel Map 7511 Exhibit "C" - Zoning and General Plan Designations Additional Study, Part I, Resolution of Approval [. E E Wit I .600 o. too w V.J a .0 "" 0 a L t ,.U.s 4 AP7 SO Awe#" 40 0. to 13 wr NURTH CITY OF Ze- -F RANCHO CUCANIONGA Trru: xzckrice-4 P NINING DIVISION EXHIBM W—SCINLE: WrS LA, 0 ZONING Iz -3-Soso -ir SrM, f „R . .h i A -[ �r GENERAL PL[fJ.7 e•. a !0 ® ® ®� ®III Ma... • .. e f e "E - ]fill % •3[ ::•- _ ..:` :::: • : :::::•:: j :t �oxT[ t CITY OF ITEM: x � RANCHO C �.'Ct1N'IONGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION F-XH[IgT: "G" SCALE: iyTS. Ll L Ilk c u 1' r ✓UNE H6L �_ ... Jw�n•l _ r -211 0 u st I . I ... liT i�f .fl� 33.p��'�I Z!��' �• t I 11 \ r I•r CI 1II`A Q �i,rnY: rnu !. YMy�vY Iny u � .inYl •r� n Ywl l,nY,. J• 1M ti V 1: M,w„w YarCnl nu �. I.CII -UI CITE' OF ITEM: ;a�e_ ez- c2r- I* I AiNCHO CUCANMONGA TITLE :lAw� - MAP 7511 PL.A'I \G DIVbl; D. I ILXPjlBIT "5r SCALE- tT=- V NORTH CITY OF RA,CC110 CI;='OVGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Enviroimm,.ental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review CDirtmittee throuyi] the &:partll/ent wheYC the project application is m=ade. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and tame action no later than ten (10) days before the p:blic meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will. he filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the pronesed project. PROJECT TITLE: Parcel Map 7511 APPLICAN'T'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Delores Browne 265 E. 7th Street Upland, CA 91786 NAME, ADDRESS, TEL --PHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONT. CONCERNING T11IS PROJECT: game as Above LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO_) 7344 ivy lane - APB 1077- 071 -01 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REG =OVAL, STATE Am FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None Z -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Divide approximately 2 one acre parcels into 3 SFR lots �^ r...,ZAG SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND ACIWAVL vj: rROJ LI�l .eazcLA AivL PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Acreage 0.96 Acres No buildings proposed DESCRIBE THE ENVIROti ^'?NTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCE_v'IC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES Ai \'D THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): The land slopes to the south at a rcximately 3% and now has one single family residence on the south end o the parcel. The trees -ano plants w is exist are generally around e nouse. The property to the north across Baseline is an existing mobile home park. o t e west an east are ex3s ing su oivizoons c u SY lots)- To the south are on larger rural lots. It: the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No. I— � 1 WILL, THIS pp.0 ACT: YES NO 0 X 1. Create a substantial change in grrund contours? X 2- Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services !police, fire, water, sewage, etc.): X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? _ X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, £lammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: r4) a zone change from A -1 to R -1 will be required. #5) Three trees ranging rom 72" to 24" diameter must be remove or improvements in aseiine Avenue. Three small trees ranging rom to game er wou o eventually be removed for aeve opment o of 1. IMPORTNINT: If the project involves the construction of residential uni+-s, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belie*. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evallation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date 5 -7 -82 Signature / s is Title Trustee RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCRT COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL NO. 32 -02 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN A -1 TO R -1 FOR .96 ACRES LOCATED CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND IVY 071 -01 )NGA PLANNING OF ZONE CHANGE THE ZONING FROM AT THE SOUTHWEST LANE - APN 1077- WHEREAS, on the 21st day of July, 1982, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of September, 1982the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed zone change would not have signifi- cant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the existing and proposed General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project will not create a siGnificant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on August 25, 1982. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 25th day of .. ",ugust, 1962, Zone Change No. 82 -02. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends thaT the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 82 -02. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and re- lated material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Counc=, Resolution No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK L.r,M, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the September S, 1582 by the following vote - .A -wl t. RYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COM.ISSIONZPS: »SENT: COMMISSIONERS: C M u CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 8, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7511 - BROWNE - P. residential subdivision of .96 acres into 3 lots located on the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Ivy Lane in the A -1 ac-.e (pending) APN 1077 - 071 -01 The above described parcel map is located at the southwest corner of Base Line Road and Ivy Lane. The site contains one existing residential struc- ture and is currently zoned A -1. A charge in zone from A -1 to R -1 is on tonight's agenda for your review. To the east and west are existing single family residences. To the south are existing single family residences fronting a private, unpaved street which extends to Palo Alto Drive. Street improvements are being required prior to recordation of the parcel map. The map is showing 10 feet of dedication and a five -foot easement for side- walk purposes on ivy Lane. Another five -foot easement is required for public utility purposes. The County approved a 50 -foot right of way for Ivy Lane at the time of development of Tract 9458_to the east to allow mini- mum lot depths of 100 feet for the property on the east side of Ivy Lane. The 10 -foot easement required for sidewalk and utility purposes will allow for tkese 100 -foot lo;. depths. An easement for drainage along the private street to the south is required to carr_ the drainage from the site to Palo Alto Street. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part 1 of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has com- pleted Part iI of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. ITEM D RECOMMENDATION: It is a1 input and elements Commission can support in the City Engineer's would be appropriate. be issued. Respectfully submitted, recommended that the Planning Commission consider of the project. If, after such consideration, the the recommended conditions of approval as written Report, then adoption of the attached resolution Also it is recommended that a Negative Declaration Maps City Engineer's Initial Study Resolution I I Y� t! I ylyy[l ^I' I J Ie TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 511 C.L. tl. tK (::r M W(tlC :.N9N'A b.Y .E..b M,ef n� n nr lL.'W e.�° w1• fjl�lpnl. ep b.4%� •/M.� Jrc 1 2' L i v x. v.v9owpnu It — I i � Ly CG r , r Wn�ns ?ROJECT SITE 71 -• C, - G ul -- qf: IN ■ � u� I11 _ NH CC Np■ = _!s_ _ - e - a� d ■ i -�• n nd ��►.� mt u 11L., , IL I s ' is � ■ CC _ N IF title; CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1 ONGA P.M. 7511 * ENGINEERING DIVISION � VICINITY tiIAP page S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Delores Browne LOCATION: Southwest corner of Base Line Road and Ivy Lane LEGAL DESCRIPTION: a subdivision of a portion of TENTATI':E MAP NO. 7511 DATE FILED: 7/2/82 NUMBER OF LOTS: 3 RECEIPT NUMBER: Lot O , Section L, T 1 1 South, P Yngc 1 dCSt ) San FrE E- D273. QG Bernardino and Merdian according to map of Cucamonga TONE: A -1 (pending R -1) Lands as recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of aps. * * * * * * * * * * •k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Terrance A. Lane, C.E. GROSS ;'CREAGE: ADDRESS: 902 W. Ninth Street MINIMUM LOT AREA: Upland, CA 91786 MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE Delores Browne 265 E. 7th Street 714/981 -5602 Upland, CA 91786 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary Xeasements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights -of -way on the following streets: 10 additional feet on Ivy Lane additional feet on additional feet on Corner P/L radius required on Other X 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: Base tine Road contiguous to Parcel 1. 4. :Street vacation required for: 5. Raster Plan of Streets revision required for: _ 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP N0. 7511 Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior to 13 Recordtii n *YA H % x dXX7�FX7f )�X tXI 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk„ one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all interior streets- X_ 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: includ' i and sca my and irri ation on STREET NAME CURB & GUTTER A.C. PVMT. SIDE- WALK DP.IVE APPR. me STREET TREES per STREET MEDIAN ISLAND* OTHER Iv Lane X X X X X TLIGHTS -t- x I I Base Line X X X X X i X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to be underground. X 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 12. install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underground service. 15. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The 1­011owing specific dimensions, i.e., su -de -sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: 18. The following existing streets are su standa They will require: Approvals and Fees 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X-20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities ties involved. Approval of the final map will be that may be received from them. RCE 20 approval from CALTRANSJ and other interested agen- subject to any requirements TENTATIVE MAP Pio. 7511 40 X 21. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans, for: —_ B. City. _ C. County Bust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep: X E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Page 3 Map Control 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. _ 23. The following lots appear to he substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 25. The boundary of the Tentatiye Map needs clarification as follows: _ 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. * Parcel Map Waiver _ 28. Information submitted at the time of application is % is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. Flood Control (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for ) 0 Building permit for ) 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. 30. A dram: age channel and /or flood protection perty line may be required to divert sheet Such flow may be required to go under 31. If water surface is above top 'of curb, 30" back of the sidewalk at all downstream cur 32. Crlverts required to be constructed across wall :long the entire north pro - runoff to streets. sidewalks through culverts. walls shall be required at the returns. streets at following locations:_ _ 33. 'Broad scale hydrologic studies will a required to assess impact of increased runoff. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP N0. 7511 Page 4 Miscellaneous 0 X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report or, subject property. 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: 34. Fruper grading and erosion control, including the preventation of sedimenta- tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. X 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the fina map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. X 43. At the time of Final Flap submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. A 10 feet wide easement for drainage will be required from the end of the proposed street to existing City street (Palo Alto). A graded Swale shall be constructed within the easement to drain runoff from the proposed street. X 46. Easement for sidewalk and public utilities as shown at the tentative map shall be 10 feet wide. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: RICE 20 11 �J l c liz cr kULN'vHV c:ut:F,NIONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT ill-FORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form inust be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which tine the project is to be .card. The Corznittee will make one of three Bete- -minations: 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the pronosed project. PROJECT TIC: Parcel Map 7511 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Delores Browne _ 265 E. 7th Street Upland, CA 91786 114-96n-I/Zb NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: dame as Above IACATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AM ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 7344 Ivy Lane - AFB 1017- 071 -01 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL. STATE ANM FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None Y -i SAVU L�.1 Lr jt, -t�1 t11V1V - w DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Divide approximately 2 one acre parcels into 3 SFR lots �n A ^ o _- aai r ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF A=MY: Acreage 0.76 Acres No buildings proposed DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTTNG OF TIM PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AIND THEIR USE (F.TTACH IiECESSARY SHEETS) : The land slopes to the south at approximately 3% and now has one single family residence on the south end of the parcel. The rem •an p ants w �c exis are generally around e house. The Drooerty to the north across Baseline is an existing mobile home — parr,. io the west ana east are existing ern suouivisiuns kicuu zir io ") . To the soutb are n on larger rural lots. In the project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No. _- 2 11 r1 U WILL THIS PROJECT: YE S RD X 1. Create a. substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) ° X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan resignations? v _ 5: Remove any existing trees? How many? x_ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: #4) a zone change "rim A -1 to R -1 will b� required. #5) Three trees ranging Irom IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: i hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and Info---nation rec•,2ired for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be recvired to be submitted before an adequate evallation can be made by the Development Review Committee. �. \ Date 5 -7 -82 Signature /[ Title Trustee Z -3 . RESIDE'_'2Z�L CO ^:STTQ1rTI0 *7 TI-e following infornatior. should be provided to the City zi _^ Cuca Plannina Division in order to aid in assessing the abilii-_r WI the school district to acco=odate the proposed residential Tame of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: 1. Number of single family units: 2. I:umber of multiple fa-mily Units: 3. Date proposed to begin ccastruction: 4. Earliest date of occ_ -_j Idodel '-` and r of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Rance PHIS , i PIU= 2 P3nS? 3 PI wS_ X 'TOT 11 C RESOLL ".ION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7511 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 7511.) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BASELINE AND IVY LANE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 1511, submitted by Delores Browne and consisting of 3 parcels, located at the southwest corner of Base Line and Ivy Lane, being a division of a portion of Lot 2, Section 2, Township 1 South, Range 7 West; San Bernardino Base and Meridian, according to Map of Cucamonga Lands Der MaD recorded in Book 4, Page 9 of P1aps, Records of San Bernardino County, State of California; and WHEREAS, on July 5, 1982, a formal application was submitted requesti.q review of the above- described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on September 8, 1982 the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the foliewing findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public he;.Ith problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: adverse environmental August 25, 1982. SECTION 3: subject to the conoit theretc. That this project will not create significant impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on That Tentative Parcel Mao Mo. 7511 is approved ions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1982. 0 Resolution No. Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary cf the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Plannin- Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and reouiarly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September, 1982, by the following vote - to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 i %IlY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT [ATE: September 8, 1982 10: Planning -ommission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer IY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician !OBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 7646 - MORGAN A residential subdivision of 1.42 acres into 2 parcels located southeast of Hillside Road, approximately 1361 feet rest of Beryl. lhis division of 1.42 acres into 2 parcels is within the R- 1- 20,000 zone with a General Plan designation of 2 DU'slacre. The site is vacant at the present time. To the west and south are existing single family residences; to the rorth and east is vacant land -zoned R -1 with a City drainage easement lying to the east side of the site. F siope and drainage easement exists at the northeast corner of this site. Since only that portion of the easement as shcwn at the corner of this property and the 10 feet easement or the east side is now required for drainage purposes, the unneeded portion should be vacated at time of final map acceptance by C --until. The existing drainage easement encompassed the entire water course as existing in the past. Due to the construction of Hillside and the provision cf a pipe culvert,the requirement for the drainage area has been substantially reduced. An easement to provide for the pipe culvert will remain. Street improvements are existina. Since the community trail will be on the north side of Hillside in this area, sidewalks will be required at time of building F>rmit issuance on the individual parcels. EVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS. Also attached for your review and consideration, is Part 1 of the Initia Study as coa:ipleted by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field iivestigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field inves- tigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a re- salt of the proposed subdivision, - CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of public hearing have been sent to surrounding pro - p=_rty cwners anti placed in the Caily Report Newspaper. F COMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input aid elements of the project. If, after such consideration the Commission can suppo tie recommended conditions of ipproval as written in the City Engineer's Report, Vien adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also continued........ ITEM E rage c recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. RespeYfully submitted, LSH:B as Attachments: Pfaps City Engineer's Report Initial Study Resolution E E 11 L] M MW Iriv r.e rt IFfit! wall i— c ? 1/ F J two �>W Qk o, M� • alb es � l =i I ® { I � 1 I 1 � I r � 1 I; Iz i 1 f I 1 E it 4 1 1 � i % b f ' _ 1 i 1 T -M •V �F3 f iC =r 43 1 v! III r: r� r e S 5FF C Y aamet j a,e � 1 ; ii �? � 1 ;,�/► T -M •V �F3 f iC =r 43 1 v! III r: r� r e S 5FF C F i n� w t UIts I* Y aamet j F i n� w t UIts I* 11 0 lu CITY OF RANTCHO CUCAN�IONGA tilde; P.M. 7646 it ( "T ENC,INE£RING DIVISION N VICINITY NIAP page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAfIONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: Calvin and Rosemary Morcan TENTATIVE MAP N0. 7646 LOCATION: S/S Hillside, W/O Beryl St. DATE FILED• August 12, 1982 NUMBER OF LOTS: 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Division of Lot 11 of Tract No. 676r�ECEIPT NUMBER: as recorded MR $6/38 -39, Records of San Bernardino Frr. County ZONE: TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Linville- Fanderson GROSS ACREAGE: 1.42 ages ADDRESS: 9587 Arrow Rte.. Suite "H" MINI'IUM LOT ARE;: Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 MINIMUM LOT FROITAGE: RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE 4 0 Calvin W. Morgan and _ 6722 Ramona 714/987 -8426 Ll Rosemary Morgan. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications 1. Dedication by final map of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication by final map of the foll; wing missing rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet or additional feet on additional feet on. Lorner P/L radius required on Other 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: X 4. S;Iltt vacation required for: por for 5. Master Plan of Streets revision requi 6. The following perimeter intersections RCE 20 eu nor: require realignment as follows: TENTATIVE MAP N0. 7646 Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required prior to ❑ Recording for U Building permit for a per) 7. Construct full street improvements ( includina curb and gutter, A.C. sidewalk, one drive approach per iot, parkway trees and street lights) aon ally X interior streets. 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: *inc7udin landscaping and irrigation or. meter CURB & A.C. CiIDF— ❑RTyc cTOC__ �T f•Tn�� -. .. _ Hillside Road X I X X I X OTHER X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitar_y sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.conduit. All utilities are to be underground_ X 11- Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, any power poles or other existing public utilies asfnecessaryiocation of 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- prove,nents. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamcnoa County Water X District standards. A letter of acceptance is required 75. Street light locations, as required, are to he approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative Poles with underground service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The o owing spec dimensions, -de -sac radius, street section widths) are not approved: The existing streets are substandar They will require: raprovals and Fees _ 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANS/ X tSan Bernardino County Flood Control District. _20. 'Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7646 Page 3 X 2i. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: _ A. Caltrans, for: _ B. City: _ C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep- )C— E. Cucamonga County Water District: sewer and water F. Other: Mao Control 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded, adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two -way traffic and parking on all affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: 24. Ail corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right -of -way line in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standards. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the first phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs c arification as follows: 27. The bcrder shall be shown to centerline of existing perimeter streets, or title explanation required. Parcel Map Waiver 28. Information submitted at the time of application is / is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act anc' local ordinances. 6111d[XadX1X11( (Bonding is required prior to )I Recording for parcels 1 & 2 ) Drainage ❑ Building permit for ) 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. _ 30. A drainage channel and /or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" wails shall be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations:_ 33. Broad scale hydrologic ed to assess impact of increased runoff. X 34. Construct drainage structure to provide drainage at (a) flowline created by ® fill where joining existing slope at northeast corne- of Parcel 2 (b) along southerly line of Parcel 2 to provide improved drainage course for Parcel 1, including inlet structure for existing C.MP. Parcel 2 must show a private RCE 20 easement to accept the drainage from Parcel l at the southerly property line. TENTATIVE MAP NO. 7646 Page 4 Miscellaneous 0 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. 37. This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired: X 34. ?roper :r:g ruz III control, including the preventation of sedimenta- tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. X 41. The filing of the tentative :map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued uniess said certification is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer small make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably intericre with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the fin map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. X 43. At the time of Final Map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies_ of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. Legal description for portion of San Bernardino County Drainage Easement to be vacated shall be submitted with final map for plan check. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: i RCE 20 E CI Ti J . r' A UHO CUCAi4ONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard: The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental 1- nipact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed ,project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Parcel Map No_ 7646 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Calvin & Rosemary Morgan. 6722 Ramona, Alta Loma, CA 91701 47141 QP7 -ny25 NAME, :.DDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Linville - Sanderson & Associates 9587 Arrow Route, suite H, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 97730 P.TTN: Gary Sanderson (714) 980 -1211 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) South side of Hillside Road and East of Carnelian street LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Commission I -1 c c PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: subdivide Lot 11 of Traci No. 6760, M.B. 86/38 -39 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUAkE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND Pn Jr USED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Total area is 1.42 acres � ------ ------ toss the site is vacant wits. S tructnru� _ _ _ DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORM, ION•ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS. ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING'STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SREETS): This Proiect sits ;. _ Si N, south, vacant to she north and east.c'�=al to rho, Gt i Is this project, part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although ind",vidually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? I -2 0 E L] n LJ WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO x 1 x 2. Create a substantial change in ground contours? Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? x 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? _ x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? x - 6. Create the need for use or disposal of _ potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flamunables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted befor` an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date Signatus� Title 0 RESIDENTIAL t..^, "�S ?nJCT, The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning 0!vision in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: :VASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 1. Number of single TOTAL family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model # and # of Tentative S. Bedrooms Pri2e- '—�anQe. RESOLUTION N0. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 7646 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAD NO. 7646) LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HILLSIDE, WEST OF BERYL STREET WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Nap Number 7646, submitted by Calvin & Rosemary Morgan and consisting of 2 parcels, located on the south side of Hillside, west of Beryl Street, being a division of Lot 11 of Tract No. 676 , 0 as recorded in Map Book 86, Pages, 38 -39, Records of San Bernardino County. WHEREAS, on August 12, 1982, a formal application was submitted requesting review cf the above - described tentative map; and WHEREAS, on September 8, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed Ceneral Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed GE:neral Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on September 8, 1982. SECTION 3. That Tentative Parcel Map No. 7646 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9 BY: King, Chairman Resolution No. Page 2 ATTEST: ecru etary o the anning omm ?sszon I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certifv that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co.�r:aission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: �-j 11 J L] ir- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 8, 1.982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission ,Y' FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Assoicate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10414 - LANDCO —A proposed custom lot subdivision of 1O± acres of land in ti o P -1- 20,000 zone into 17 lots located south of Carrari Strut, west of Haven Avenue - APN 201 - 101 -17. PRCJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: she applicant is requesting approval of a residential custom lot subdivision of 17 lots in tha R- 1- 20,000 zone, located south of Carrs.•i Street and west of Haven Aven:a (Exhibit "A "). The property is presently vacant and slopes from the north to the south at approximately 7% to 8% grrde. The project site is bounded on the north by an existing flood central ditch and vacant land, on the west, by vacant agricult4 ;dl land, on the south by existing single family homes and on the east by vacant land proposed f:,r a church site. ;;AYLSIS: This project has been reviewed by the Design Review, Growth Management, Grading and Equestrian. Advisory Zonanittees. The major concern of these Committees was gradi..g and drainage, paticularly on lot G. As shown on the Conceptual Grading Plan, Exhibit "D ", maintaining the natural contours on lots 1 -5 results in a substantial slope at that corner of lot G. The Grading Committee has worked with the applicant to a point where the drainage problem has been adequately resolved with the adoption of the attached condition. The attached Master Plan, Exhibit "V, indicates the lot patterns of surrounding properties and the potential for future subdivisions. The existing reservation for highway purposes at the north tract boundary will become a public street to connect frown Haven to Hermosa. This street will also provide the optimum situation for drainage as opposed to a drainage easement. Therefore, the subdivision design was dictated by surrounding land uses and street patterns. All other c:ncerns ana issues of these Committees are reflected in the Tentative Tract Map, Exhibit 'C", and Conditions of Approval. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant is attached for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Studv and has found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. Therefore, issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. ITEM F Environmental Asse.—ne:,t and Tentative Tract No. 10414 Planning Commission Agenda September 8, 1982 Page 2 FACTS OR F INS INGS: The subdivision map has been prepared in accordance with City standards and policies. The project site is suitable for the proposed subdivision and the design of this projecu is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. CORRESPONDENCE: A Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Daily Report newspaper and approximately 15 notices were seat to property owners within 330 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issu nce of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Res ctlill ss mitted, Clty ]Planner RG /DC /kep IActachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit 08° - Subdivision Map Exhibit "C° - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D° - Master Plan Part I Initial Study Resolution, Conditions of Approval L] U En � Ir / { .. _, .! 3 - � .. �.. ' - ..f 1. J 1. 1 F' :1�1 1 1 'Y I � ' ,. ,.� ;'. �. VACAWT 0-1-20 .. _'�� - I 1 m,orT w�Mrfr i feass fair I eaw/a�fr w �i.= wao-orr� � y a< � ,— is -'— _ J' s• _ I� "�t1_ - L•J�. ,711 � t F I 'I Ll� e[aoxfr� i� I ;� 6 RTlO Mir 1E �" RAIA1" *uG ! RING, 9 FAUXT ■imawr1AL 1 �- YAC1 0110Y¢ PARCEL MAP 479 i I I A-1 -10 rr PARCEL MAP aaat CitYO RA.N, CHO CL "CA',\, :O \G.k PLANNING DIVISO t VACANT A -1 -t0 C 0 CITY OF RAINC�O -�A MrCw *w tar aa,, Lw �L.RYYLi P jG^ CL "UMMO\'G PLANNING DiNrllgON 1 �'w \ORIT; TITLE: E%I ilB T= __ SCALE ®'s X - i 0 II I 0 cows i11OYY� I I- -.. . I , I Ij c ii © I J I I 6 ita fr CITY OF RANCHO CUGVN,JONG.A. PLANNING DIVISION I M I - 1J r YYCYT iff I a I F ; a.*s Pa , I I _ G NORTH u IIj y r YYCYT iff I a I F ; a.*s Pa , I I _ G NORTH u u 0 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA ^IOSGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT Ib^OFtrATION Srcl^ - To be completed by apolica. ^.t Enviro=—.ental Assessment Review Fee: $80.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed a -d submitted to the Deveioc:nen[ Review Co=aittee throng "r, the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Envircnmental Analysis staff will rrct;are Part II of the Initial Stud-y. The Develol)ment Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the a_b lic meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Co=—J ttee will ma ;a one of three determninations: 1) The project will have no envirorznental izepact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have an envlron ^ental ?_:7ac-- a-:d an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the amnlicant givi::g _ -further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Tentative Tract No. 10414 APPLICANT'S i7A1,1E, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: Landco Development. Inc. 150 South Los Robles, Suite 740, Pasadena, CA. 91101 (213) 449 -2622 MME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING Ti11S PROTECT: .Frank R. 'eilliams of Associated Engineers 316 East "E" Street, Ontario CA. 91764 (714) 986 -5818 LOCATION OF PR'.)JECT (STR=ET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) North end of Riloeview Avenue approximately 660' north of Hillside Road._ Assessor's Parcel No. 201- 101 -17 LIST OTHER PER: -UTS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL. STATE AIM FEDERAL 'AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Public report by California Division of Real Estate; water and Fire protection system approval. by Cucamonga County Water District and Foothill Fire Protection District; on site sewage disposal system approval by the Santa Ana Regional Watcr Quality Control Board. a -1 i PROJECT DESCRIPTION- C DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Division o -_' the property into 17 residential lots for custom housing develooment. �J ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTI::G Am PROPOSED BUILDI17GS, IF ANY: Project area = 9.993 acres (a_ross) Lats are to be sold for custom development. No structures are proposed at this time. DESCRIBE THE E%7VIRM7" == +?'?L SETTI "_:G OF TFE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFOR•iATIO\ OX TOPOGRAPHY, PL.A'__TS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTU ??L, HISTORICAL OR SC- IC ASPEI'TS, USE OF SURROMNTDIi�G PPAPERTIES, AND THE IDESCRT —PTION OF A.:-Y` EXISTI�:G STRUCTURES AXD THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS) The property is vacant and uniformly sloping from north to south at _ approximately 70A — 8% ¢rade. The site 'lies on the westerly nortionof the Deer Creek alluvial fan, is bounded on -the north by an existing flood control ditch, on the west by vacant agricultural land, on the south by existinc Residential development_ and on the east by unimnrove acreage. There is no present or past use of the property in evidence._ Fauna consists of native brush and weeds. wildlife consists of ¢round rodents, covotes lizards, birds common to foothill areas and insects. There is evidence that the site is occasionally traversed by deer and quail. There are no known cultural or historical aspects of signifi- cance related to the site. Is the project, part of a lar-ger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which aithough individually small, may as a whole have significant envirommental inpact? No. I- 2 J L E WILL THIS ?PO-- CT: YES No 1. Create a sub. —� s..artiai change in ground contours? x 2. Create a s•,b,ta-t -, '—' �� -�� change in existing noise or vibration? x 3. Create a substart4a1 change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? x 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x S.: Remove any existing trees? How many? x 6. Create the neee for use or disposal of patentJally hazardo;:s materials such as toxic substances, °lar_mables or explosives? EX-Planation of any YwS answers above: IMPART *.�,—,: If the project . involves the construction of residential units, complete the fom on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial. evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to my knowledge and :,_lief. I farther the best of additi understand that cr al information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaulation can br made by the Development Reviecc Com 1ittee. Date April 29, 1982 Landco Development, Inc. Signature onald R. Hornbe k. Title President %3 r LJ RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10414 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10414 hereinafter "Map" submitted by Landco Development, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in ti-3 City .'f Rancho Cucamonga, County of San. Bernardino, State of California, describe i as a cs.'stoa: lot subdivision of i0t acres of land into 17 lots, regularly came before the Planning COminmssion for public hearing and action on September 8, 1982; and WHEREAS, th, City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subiect to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planing Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10414 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious Public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (g) That this project will the environment and issued. not create advers3 impacts on a Negative Declaration is r i Resolution Ao. Page 2 Do SECTION 2• Tentative Tract Map No. 10414 a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION I. The approval shall becone null and void if the final subdivision map is not approved and recorded within twenty four (24) months from the approval of this p^nvi Ct unless an 2X.Gl,l vl.. l h as been granted .Lr .. the Planning Commission. BUILDING & SAFETY DIVISION 2. Provide drainage structures for interception of surface drainage from equestrian /drainage easement along westerly boundary and from lots 3,4, and 5; said drainage to be conducted to safe location for disposition satisfactory to the City Engir.,-,:!r and Building Official. 3. The rough grading plan shall be completed and approved by the Grading Committee prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. ENGINEERING DIVISION 4. Developer shall construct the following items along Ridgeview Avenue from the tract boundary southeriy to Hillside Road: curb and gutter along the west side including drive approaches; curb and gutter along the east side including drive approaches only at the locations where a residential development currently exist; and all pavement including a minimum 26-foot wide pavement where curb and gutter does not exist on the east side. 5. Developer shall provide a drainage swale along the no:•th shoulder of Hillside Road from Ridgeview Avenue westerly to Hermosa . Avenue to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. Developer shall provide a rolled entrance at Ridgeview Avenue and Street "A ", and any necessary drainage devices at the intersection of Hillside Road and Ridgeview Avenue. 7. Developer shall construct a drainage device at the west end of Street "A" to drain the runoff to the existing drainage channel to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 1J Resclution No, Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commnission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission if the City of Rancho Cucamong , do hereby certify that the foregoing Resclution was duly ara regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COKMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: 40 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: G v _ N` y N d d` •'• ✓ N N 4 V f V •O.• 4 V •w V V L V e M M O V✓n r�cc U VO .VnC' P ^o G . C n .. O -°•a r C V J W «�� b M L i�.O V C q✓ JC• y0 O L L y =_ S O O• q` c O C L ° n y r C T y L T G V N d O` y V I° S L L r L d C O O V �- 6 L r G •� q i � _�'• � C L J L n ~ C ✓ n a° L ✓ � ,Li• J C T« v L a P C C �+ N r_ V _ O G J ..� a r N p• q n D � y n c' q V 'C � L 0:5 C�� _ FC L O � O C_ L d q 2 •L.r ° °^ ..• 4 D G_ O N E C .. •. G ' O S V✓ q 6 V — G N W E V T r q � 1.. U °_ G O a n vL •^— C_ C O y__ a L d �L- V CP yu i Cl C S q V C w E W N` VC � LPL t_G i C c 7 N V S V a ,.Ci O Z :s i ?° O L >✓ _ [ L c :2 N L n aY� O— L >— _L V•�l'JC ec °e J 2 L f � � S V p L V L L ^ .� ✓ C q - G` �v �rL.. °L, o D ✓o °L•. .: io Qd� ^° ` Di ✓i« n4✓ ;y .._ _ J� ._ cc `me v °` rn «:° ✓c ° °�°a °q "oc - —N co _c r_,i'.: Cc M - oe N° yr i° r�..9 w- of °io �.°.•y ^^ t`.,.a :°T✓,. `� e G V � � c d v c Y z L •°,.• i 6� �� .'"..' 3 8'E c a °°•..L. N n ri ° °_' � `- -° a v °. ° � =- ` LL ° °V yJ >, u'• ynVd_ d° TO ° °q VyO yq 'o c •'°iV CVT VI _ ✓ — E Y. Lp Jy V �S Ja dL CC S�Gd u L— Cdn °a G L OD it "N ^�D a i_ JL T'�dF a VO —_ drCa ✓cC U- O�q�r•a S `ya ° r° r 4 ° •'` V 'O N� L S .0 � .Jn V N 4 V y_ _ G L— 6 n y b > J � L N C L V 4 y q ? C G > n 1 I I � �• � � NI I � • ' NI T � NI � N 4I I I O p •r T✓ L -_ I � � ° �• i p ° _ P ,Vir L N •n L V" C a�.• � L L N ° L s •Ga — E � .rGi ^ 'Zb� 1+ �c L v LJ du y_o = »t, LE °c= I �� Z O d ° C S C N° y ✓ P ,ai. a a V_ N > 4 ti W L� Gw d.Tr i° �N •"'° NOS V�. CG O.' q'_ C Ny ° V CCi q ✓L OD J MLG .i ^ p > N L Lr LNN aJC °C I S �� C V . n u y V V P r N r u C y > C O` „✓ � ✓ _ O C ✓ i O Cq C O C r^ ° C _^ a_ C n o r p L tOl 1 I I d .I vd dr ,] V• u. Vr^ rnC� ^O .v V O V O I I �� V� C CG adi •Jn V✓q N.O.• Cq6 NOL °q O ^u6 •ai V � �` V a0.• �OC t Lw°i^ y �. c� — L �JLy "' qV O � 1 �_� •i0• �• CT ;_°V. N9 aV nlJ SL V >T C`V GC u0 nO�q a n« Y __ 1I1V d OY °•Jn WVC °N ASS �L VaL you liy Ga= GM•°•✓ n GI L 1 �� C ^ aC qV. y_ =C4 qP� O Lv' a✓a �.Y .°.._� V r =V O VT •'`•n �V dam` A i S CV C «u° N i> 7;1 I � � C n^ r � L� d � d r C C ✓ ✓ V N G q v .. r_ « E v i v ."o r.� D °c LNN ov °° „•^ qE « c i f >, � ±°� "` �= N •^n V aG� G> y V i S .M c^ a n O C J a « 0 2 q a V _ p V V ✓ VTR SCa. T✓ �> a"L «• a L C t•yC �! I�L ¢ � Vw �OaJ ONO ai .LnSC' Sa lPN LV° •L.• V n. ° NN O N 6 L Q�u rC L CV CAS _` C.V C >Twf _ y0 � L y y 6 4J C O N G ,°,• V l at N 6 V ti G V NI I ^I \I I i T n o e c J• N ,dio c 4 .. d � � c L AML ,- 'i c. i I, q Fx_ ✓Gi. =oeo ✓ o r x ° e� x o _ u y c c ¢ c � o o .°- L ✓ °c �^� id` c r ✓_�..— b V _L _ V Mr°. A — V O C r u ^_ ✓ C •_ y l C > L \ L T O 6 LL V j l Ir u — L L' b V V O x p_ _ q C l G n C — i O � ¢ C y C ^— V O d O .F+ P C G 7 P t> C d P A� I � � D. d s q✓ N�"rf LOO >O C¢ {L Ox `�dq N> yl V V CiM d ,O ✓ -.iE N^ n. .. � —PO. L. N d d— � _> �V 9 ' �x ✓Li0 _ E3D Yi« IOC IL ev- � •- - - r C vvi ° v L°, o ,pro < v 8�✓qr °'_ I✓ Acv «co c ..r F F v d uPN ¢ r ° L n \o LI _ 13 , N 13 c — d E y � O p d 2 N N � . v ¢ � r r ti � .L.. °p L V �—.. � ✓ 1.°s ✓ � � o - " d — x TC✓ a. E= — C ° c NI C CO � ✓ GO ` I��V N C � =sDI TO _C NT 1 d o' ° °V v= o3nm c'>✓.. ` r_'„- p °`.o� cx N✓ c.o r t eLL <Sa <¢p Lc° <I ..O F 4I Sr rCO N c>�V O P O r V 3� -•� O � W c N O V i L� � 4 x T= ` C V _ r ✓ ` na V � L' _ C C r C- V � ` ti O N n i 0✓ �V Nr NUd 6Nr �¢✓ O. � Or r�tq. c, u C U` C L DEC TP r_V nYl �" u ¢ __•�. NY bP r4UOC gti6 ° Ol t VLx40� -� r- Vyi� ,^N 2 7 FCV NTV r ✓ y ✓� E q u 9 V � `-+ O V x � b -v -� b n � i L L � y V N C � s O .Ln n ' a _- V v✓ a C V> L .L, p N u i V r e r ,C W- N � N d d L✓ > a � c o � ✓✓ C t L � O �C bV_ V. r ,r C V C � = � L P✓ V N V D O D M C.E O Pi d - O f ✓ C N C y V O i t C T L✓ P ✓o_E `� � ro _q €- ,c � c `�a; ," • i c :i. °u con ° `D¢ r.0 U V ['M -°.N PV r u N V L ,nL H� ✓rL�9 °'i'y LN C PC C C � q N r L y ¢ N r V✓ L — � d— L V— _ E 6 u .L. S � C Nd "' c a q b V N u G >o .o � ad. i v _ �` <ry cr cr � W OS -- L�1✓ �C d CC L d ,n � ✓� C✓ u ✓dC Cn+ CN' CV =� —rJ �L .rp L 9Nr �\ L N r °,.O SFT ✓ O rSCJPPV `r «n.0.. V9 T ? V C V�` —x O S` T V . 9 O r .� V _ q b A✓ VJ y- P N> V O ]n > j r C r C C C C C 9 v n cu m nN a °'o P L o �c`nga> q -cam' � E u �4� ✓ =cv -E -y'4' � a 9 P ¢ v\ = L O V V - G.. O C U �v e `� � ✓ i .q.. .L. - i� e i � r. r n m C2 LSD,( x NC Vt —r 4 __ d _ U> _ VSP ✓p G =L 9= qC G O ON �� GN _ —V W._ NV dL'r C <�CJU VV t GO ieL ��F..y ✓Y'riN =mot T 2— > N �_ r P O N= 4 N r r � V N P n d >� n� 4 6 r b r . � O 1 u P C a C,` O N✓ -rt 4 ? O C n C t1 v ,U .✓ r L V q 0 O C '� C_ ✓ O G V x N P V C i— C b C "' ° .°_ 1 r c l M1✓ N 'f T r n`� � _ 4 T' ° L G: i C n C` L r aV.. y C_ 4 r 0 x� r y L < 6 r .P. w O T O L r O u V E q r — V n`f N Pi ✓ 6 E E tOi w N q Q N O. Q O C < P 6 N M .O. V R S G� O L < `• O 4 � ,O w V •- 9 Y T V _ _ _a-L• � c ` `' y u l� 0 3_:1. ��Py °a J `yam oL C _ J �--. �� 4 N 4 V d G V a " C" `J T -. d N u � ✓= J i 6•-� _ T ..• - r '. l I I L I I d vv� rn va 9�.Li V v`o i�c i�� -� «.°o ;r �� ='O•_ � Lc � � .. _ -'.. .°'rte v -p prx _ u�4 `da LdnL.� a "° cro_� - � i •_' '^ 1 i ��o =qV ` C` Lf � CJC p =v TCCVi d O `��O •a Gi U n I 1 li J9u a r G. m_ ? : m- v n✓ w o c ._ _ W n _ c L °„ = I i T c u- t ` r a L .`� � ° � ° - p = =• s. c " o cPC L s `o ° c � c ✓ -1 n " - � c r. c � � ' r ..:�qo L N p0 O ✓ V _ L•t ° ✓_ = F q ✓i W N N L W S F -- _� _ = W V v •.. _ � ° 6 C OCY iL O q =� � '^ V LV O`er- •L-.�L dL Ur dY LI � '� S nq L _. L ✓ _ . ✓N .'p N t C _ ._c -c .. L•'•� = •^_ GTO✓ -003 .rc- W Wo~2� c .° v:]M- �� r-• q °N > ��._ °• r L a.°. Toq tout i WI -� v_� < '� �uv dy ° rc •-c_ o c NcW gGNr .. NNrod ul vl E.. ° °vo 1 -zE a n °-' L ✓ n 'O . M ° w p .°., L. C .._ -j W n y �^ o ' °' ° G - L -VI � -J C P O- - d L � i' � .G^ O r '� V �° P U L p✓ .\ W l C V n 9 �- I C � j I ` 9- VV9-' LV V✓ C'VO V u W 6•./° �L�L Pq GU _d•+ q L L � I I L I MOq 1= q n3Jy V >i I O L _ _ V - L O ._ «O O y _. N •n N O L V__ q " 4 O I V o w P r •o N r d p r C V _ _ - C -_J C c•c ca o.o o co_ V r�o c�°.� N.L.. _ °� a • v c y I I ? sio V J - PO G• p CI V V VOA GVA 6p �a,J UJ• C a _ q� �• � e-A _ I I C O I �`� ° ` C G O C: •• 1 I I I Y O � °I zs I � VI 1 Ni N V c y •. � � .L =-_-. == E _ E O C d V O t r °�° O O W C L V T �✓ y L •J ✓° 4 9 L l _4 O ✓ .-- v d n � - C v� c G ✓ 4 P.• y 9 V Y ✓ O _ �` � - _ 4 - O •T• � � C LVL -N rV GG _r `�r Vr✓ •••ti T =O U'p �' `.� C✓ Oy _ O_ V_ _ ✓ p M- �. C '• .O C r• V W L •o L LS G n � ✓ f L C ` ' u_'� LV L•' - C i s ✓� S 3 0 q q W ti Y E y y L E 4 V c c G c P �LOj nut.•LOC ✓v� - ie✓. .✓. o .: "' "-"• _^ v` i c -'� •- .�da per` W pd _ r? -' - U_V .r ,. OLq rF 10• q N> ✓ a °Y Gt' C LrL�.r 1t VC � � V • .J_ .�.•p '- Sl C O L c •'� •r L•- t V Vy •.'}C _LL VC.� u y ^,_° O ✓V_ tC CN L� dNA _ - aN S.L4r trq N r N J T_ G C � O r- -• t M a V N P W _ r D- u} O •r C ✓ O V ./� C L T S d C ` u P 4. O L S.E E °.W.y `4.. 5 o- � _ °.: •�_ o�n- ^_ v �...� e._oP - -5 pc •N•o° nro "� � nc � a. a L' 6 °- �.°• t' o C -.J -_VCCV w ✓ W ^LC O �'L° __ Cry CL •J• ✓-Jr L p 0✓ fJ •ny O � p L� T «� L d _ L q ' O NI LO _ _ Y G O V O� _ C O C f N • -J N P _' O N r _ O c P �� r� G� r � "-� q �• N �: 7 V L ` 4 ° C e ��T. o.. .. �y cv -�_ c _ c o-1 r`v Po... °_�^ -`^ o � •• _ � a L'C - - «`�.'^ °' S -q Lo_ .°�o° G o'v`a °_ ;e .'v4 -• -� y Scoo -a� vc -.. qv_ �I r�N =LC p... �v ✓� o. _ L = � ��_ p L ✓° vL`- yc_ _ _ c c q � =v ml VG°J o. .o. .°: "' °'__' �_ a+�°. _ _ " uti r ` a. :.= _ - L O V O L V O T O° p C •n ==�« F �= V` 4 V n u�i J` p V 'a 9 q •n -f F= ��� V p .n - V L. Ly `�r4V Cp _L ✓u N. °� H "C_d pr�0 _LV -.V _ldN N O _vp - C^ °✓ •c Cx a�OSG ✓-J ii 20 �✓ Q G6n r =_u d!0 `.OV LO�Jj MO i ` -G _ t• _ _ _ O G � •E V Gj d N V V i- c '^ - r 9_ J _ y_ ^ r O - C �� .`i. V N �. S u q L •�.. O - L r N •.O. -' O V^ V r v r. V - L S V l � M LL V- V° G qO�V"• NL_ ✓1 G ✓_ '_L �L_? p =� G7'� G. ar _ � r V •n C L. W .r J L. •' '� � u` V V ^ te r N U G V V V �- L L '�' �� -W d.• ✓_p `__ _ d� --. - ._ -- �u•j� o�o�u oc4�.` M vil "vY .I N✓... W_ NN G)9GCi a°� CY CGL rI �y r -O a L 0O Lu yn ` V m .O C b T G a .n N O t O ^ q — q v C� C ._ •r � L I I I O -. '^ �.' ° C b_r i � ✓C. y� � v2 2° r_'G NV .. . I I r.y T• ^•-a O ` ° 'n � ` V ` I' C lJ � N `` ° u y M V O N I• U y = V— r u G ..Jl �_: `J f ci ^N -:!L °r �V �' 2— q OLC dL �6 ✓i! ICO° uV r0 \P Gq MV L� LN 7 f p — I • — O U _ NI i i vI � O � � ✓! - - I Y C V -• a L b 1J ^ C I p I I I I u o O C ` a .°. 9 O V Y � V° C U L Q( 1 I J l u _ ••• C L r n2` G O �` `� y O• r _ L o i L L C V V� ` � G= j h p � C O r V O L° If Z: V >.r. 9 O u O V r •'a p -� r 4 L u. ?° q_ � I'� -�— I i I ° `moe cc�° °_ °� ^� yc r••c - °y ~iV 4r u� c c �. -113I i I I Tc . c -`a ^O• Cu_. No T_ —u_ �_ _rLV ryN v v =l 1 I YCO GV� ^vC °L t z n O V .O _ .> = r `I .� C c � � C IS r I I 1 I I - .°.r C• T � C O V � �_ O 4 O 9 C t .+ __ q ^I n , i I � ; = °.nV V.L. � UO— <V °. y '4 Iz . - 7 =0 Ln 7 e L T T � A Nji E U d L r! r 6C� ;9 I O vv O•� O � « �•� z v i AJ^ OrrU� V — — d C r L y L L d ^e �r — _r a 3 u _ a E a. 9 V J V Cr S O 4 O ^ LcrOi O �� r l V Ir ~ S O o S C d Or Caw O O •.r O rr 4 A? O C "• i O V j � Lr O t= O V N A � Cn u C• O C W�UNO -C7 =1 V O O� c Z 1 ``rV O r V Ln Q d T Nji r 6C� ;9 I O — — d r V Ir S o Lr O t= O V N A V O N c 1 ``rV O r V V if — C C •_� _ � O `J 7 � V r ^CS V NO � C9 CCL 9 TO 11`y'1 � A G Vi IwVS LM h�.r O< A C O C <S —A Lc 6A 4r�. -G Z2 C r V Ln 0 CJ IJ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 8, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-16 - WALLS - The establishment of an arcade in the C -I -T zone to be located at 9687 Base Line in the Base Line Village Shopping Center. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval of a 1,580 square foot video game arcade to be located at 9687 Base Line. Attached as Exhibit "D" is a description of the proposed arcade operation. The arcade would be open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 10:30 p.m. and on weekends from 10 a.m. to midnight. The applicant intends to start with 15 machines and expand per demand. The arcade is proposed to be located in the middle of a retail shop building as shown on the Site Plan, Exhibit "S ". The site is presently zoned C -1 (Neighborhood Commercial) and contains a Pup 'N' Taco, Sarru's Pizza, Baskin Robbins, and retail /office uses. ANALYSIS: As shown on Exhibit "A ", the proposed arcade is located approximately 2,000 feet from Alta Loma Elementary and Cucamonga Junior High Schools. The surrounding zoning and land use is shown on Exhibit "E ". To the south and west are single family homes. The applicant intends to provide adult supervision and is proposing that no person under 16 years of age would be permitted in the arcade during school hours. However, persons under 16 years of age are still of school age and not considered an adult. Therefore, staff recommends that no persons under 18 years of age be admitted during school hours. A pay phone.. change making, interior seating, vending machines and restrooms will be provided to discourage loitering. Bicycle racks will be provided per Conditions of Approval. FACTS FOR FINDING: Based upon a review of the information provided by the applicant and the site, the proposed arcade meets the criteria of Ordinance 174 and would not cause a public health nuisance or be mate- rially injurious to property in the vicinity. The -iroposed arcade could be compatible with the existing shopping center uses with the adoption of the recommended Conditions of Approval. ITEM G ,f - CUP 82 -15 /Wa 11 s Plarning Cu Wnission Agenda September 8, 1982 Page 2 CORRESPONDENCE: This project has been advertised as a public hearing item and a tenants within the shopping center, as well as Property owners within 300 feet, have been notified of such rg• In a tion, the Sheriff's Department, Fire District, and theprincipalsdof Alta Loma Elementary School and ruca -mon -a junior high School were -- '4fied of the application. A letter of opposition from the owner of the Aipha Beta Shopping Center has been attached for your review. The Sheriff's Department, Foothill Fire District and Alto Loma Elementary School have no objection to the arcade. Mo other commi:ni- cations for or against the project have been received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the at input T material regarding this item. of Approval is attached for your review and RG: DC: j r :ted , Planning Commission consider A Resolution with Conditions consideration. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Floor Plan Exhibit "D" - Description, of Project Letter From Adjacent Property Owner Resolution Conditions of Approval 11 9 r 1 f1 t :4 Run luWnl un ME u■�araao { +' air, Him H11n11nnlNinllitnl{ Ito . °� u�tlnnutmt_ _ � minnul� u ►.� �. tia� �it. �il■1 ::F� Mtn In : sm no ♦ .� =.T� %� � �; : _= to , ' 3s -tl■ t ■1 ■ ■ttgp ■11 ■ ■rr pv,-.... as . „'�_� •.r, as ItN11 ttflt ■t =tt11n ■ ■r ■a11�Iltt r11N - It /Ifl:: -`►� -t 1111 MME :: emu. ■`�I- ■it =Lam -- �i as •.ia all no Wm 7 MIN aa 1,��1■ � ■I ■tlt■t -- �•4� u r■n■ NI■Itlt ■- � �'�� ■ ■ ■O --' �unaaauaa�a C�IUINIIIfItI ■t■t -! -�. vaa�aataaa - 11111!1 %1■ t ' gas man ohm x �A s E t-; 'i AF AvE- S,.,.,, a cP 4CPIN Ea t' 4 z I F7 !r a ......... wow. 1 NORTH CITY OF ITF-Xl-- /00�upfzlwlce RANCHO CUC-\.\,IONLGA TITLE: FLOW PLAT KING Dlv%"M\, E-XfilBrr- SCALE-- � ---------------- �A s E t-; 'i AF AvE- S,.,.,, a cP 4CPIN Ea t' 4 z I F7 !r a ......... wow. 1 NORTH CITY OF ITF-Xl-- /00�upfzlwlce RANCHO CUC-\.\,IONLGA TITLE: FLOW PLAT KING Dlv%"M\, E-XfilBrr- SCALE-- � 0 • i` Ash I P + � J -vp L.:r.�N�rc p.:yL•� LAS =;:= =� `? REST j ; C�Opan T I E ---- # T 'Fj4 C � OPERATION FOR VIDEO ARCADE TO BE AS PROBLEMS. VITH MINORS TO Br. DEALT W'—'-' _� � ^. , •., ..N . �.yN \-�.. ALL PERSONS CAUSING A DT.STURBANCE :BILL "AVE A ° -_'-D INTER ?G,r -' ^_N CFII CARD FILLED 0'J7. THIS CARD TC TWO INCIDENTS IN A 3C DAY °ERIOD PERSONS COMMITTING A SECOND DTSTL'� ^AX ° p. _ _ ^V ? TCD 'MORE SERICL'S 'DISTURBANCE WILL HAV° _;^ -,1?. .':`. "S E7 PREYI`SES TO CLEAR JP TKE PROBLEM CR N ^_V'_ r..,T ?EF,SC\ OR a= "C'�S 'FROM Tii= PRAISES. ONLY WKEN T_•iE A30VE ACTICNS HAVE FAILED WILL THE PROPER AUTHORITIES BE CA, FOR LOT,TE'RTTNG OUTSIDE: E}'ERY ATTE?!PT IfPLL SE MADE TO HAN ^.E T _ -.E v, ^INNER S'.AT =^ A ? ^ \'- 0 NO CH:I_LD UNDER 16 YEARS OF AGE SHALL SL , ",'__ ^'ti'ED IN THE ARC ": 0'_'. SCHOOL F'O17R5 UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY AN ';AS ;Z- 7-=-N 5 ON VPT"r A P'H'ONE = FOR VERIFICATION 14TT n. ^;1R =NT. THE NAMES OF ANY CHILD SKI?PING APP-ROPRIATE SC-'00'- AND SHALL BE AND N0T:FICA7TON OF PARENTS, '� °OSTET`�RVLr"S SC -00L :cI__ -_ ,:RN =C IN TO . _ S7;NN=D -0Z A °= ^I ^•D OF 77 DAVS NO S'MOKTNG NO PROFANITY NO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES NO DRUGS NO LOITERING OUTSTn= NO Si-(_TRTP NO SHOES -NO SERVIC_S NO PERSONS UNDER _, YEARS AFTER ' C ?X PARENTS AND OTHER ADULTS ARE ALWAYS W =L CYc: AND TO PROMOTE THIS A SPECIAL EVENING AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK =' ^•: I:3C oft TC E:70 au a 2ENTS CAN PLAY FREE :dfiEN ACCCMPA ?;IED BY A AN AREA IN THE REAR OF .H.= BUILDIN= AS A ?�!ENT AND _CUN E AREA FOR TH °- -D TASLES ANO CHAIRS WILL 3_ PROVIDE_ I.: TF*E IDEA OF PUTTING THE CHANCE OF _0T . ERIN, I \ LO NGE A?° A FRCNT 0= - = 'V I'_' _' •:. . A :)AY P -ONE TO BE INSTALLED IN .. -._ exaffl'r '901, 11 C r E j` WE WILL PRCVIDE THE CHANGE IN THE FO ^.V. ^� , n''S -_7 C? A MACHINE SO AS NOT 70 DISTURB OUR c'J5'. \°7_S = _- AN ADULT SUPERVISOR WILL BE IN THE LC•^.A7 -C% ? ":^ A'__ ='JSI \ES5 - _ _ ._ A 3TCYC_E RACK WILL BE PROVIDED IN = - ^.C'. C= --.c 7-UI_ INS .. -- EV ER. ACCEPTA°LF-. A FIRST AID KIT WILL EE MAINTAINED AS A CC \VE`:I =NC= T^ OJR vn- 7�q MONDAY TF-RU l._ ^JRSDAY lC: CORM :'0 10:3CFM P'•CTaAYS, SA7:11RDAYS A:^ EC'_,? AYS _C:CCIL'^ C 12:nC="'' J J' S AYCAa 9124 _ CC :1 ' T B' ,V:_ p� :.-n =A: MONDAY � 1;; ' =',,'RSCAY 1C : C CAM TO 2,C:3 CP'! ??^.^.AYS AND S.,%7j�AYS 10:Cat%%! ^_'0 301:' L' i? A?^AaE 9591 FCO = J 3?.VD. , Rfti�CL^ C , ti r. MCNDAY 'T-a2U =SDAY ll:OCAM TO 10:30P"' __`AYS, SA ^?SAYS A:C S_NDAYS 10:3CA? S Av .D 'vTCEC ' 23c -nn.•c 71 ^* rJ S� ?Y _r1U =SDAY 0 :CCAM TO 12-COPL.1 T a._Y IL 7 SA =MAY = 0:0CAv O 2:00AM C`"-^-•^,.^l A1?.n_ATJE 977 WES ' Fn-=LL —m:, 3'•_%a; ? _. c_ _ _'7S2AY 10: CCAY TO 12 : CCPJv F=_AY ADD a;_,7a —.v 101.nnAM TO , ==A:y 1C: C^ "t! T 12:00 ?M A=Z 5" ' AVM. - , - Y ?d L�i) vA IY S We will start witz 15 mac_•iines and add machines to meet the dems_ -no to approximately 36 o: 40 machines. em ear l in C -d I C -INT 7J4 � iliz��E • SF l -- SF 5F S� CHu ca-I R i CITY OF RANCHO CL"C- kN10 \GA PLAONNING DIVISION t-v -ZWT C� NORTH ITE.%l: Gcl P SZ-1 (c TITLE: �i %— i� no*4 EXHIBIT: SCALE: a_ 0 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82 -16 FOR AN ARCADE LOCATED AT 9687 BASE LINE IN THE C -1 -T ZONE WHEREAS, on the 12th day of August, 1982, a complete application was filed by Ronald Walls for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of September, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTIGN 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -16 is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. No person under 18 years of age may enter, be or remain in any part of a game arcade during the hours school is in regular session and after curfew. This limitation shall be prominently posted at the entrance of The facility, in letters not less than 1" in height, and shall be enforced by the adult supervisor. 2. The following levels of adult, 21 years of age or older, supervision shall be maintained at all ti..--c- during business hours: 1 -25 Amusement Devices: - i Ac -41-c Supervisor 26 -50 .Amusement Divices: - 2 Adult Supervisors 51 + Amusement Devices - 2 Adult Supervisors, plus 1 Uniformed Security Guard Resolution No. Page 2 3. Separate public restrooms for men and women must be provided within the approved building and controlled. d. An interior waiting area with seating facilities must be provided for patrons wishing to relax or wait for an amusement device to become available. 5. Change- making or toke. exchange facilities shall be provided for patron use inside the premises. 6. Adequate exterior lighting shall be provided for evening security adjacent to all entrances and exterior walls of the building where the games are located. All lighting shall be arranged and shielded so as to eliminate exces- sive glare or reflection onto adjoining properties cr businesses. i. Access to the game area must be from the main entrance to the primary use and not from a separate exterior entrance. The rear exit shall be for "Fire Exit Only ". S. Adequate interior clear space shall be provided for safe and convenient patron circulation and shall meet the following minimum standards: (a) Amusement devices shall be located no closer than 12" from any wall assembly separating the arcade from any adjacent building or portion of a building. (b) Provide a minimum of 60" between amusement devices and any entrance or exit. (c) Where amusement devices are located along one side of an aisle, provide a minimum unobstructed aisle width of 66 ". Where amusement devices are located along both sides of any aisle, provide a minimum unobstructed aisle width of 90 ". (d) Additional interior d ear space may be required by the Building Official, Foothill Fire District, or Sheriff's Department in order to maintain public safety. 9. Two parking stalls adjacent to the arcade shall be striped I] L Resolution No. Page 3 and designated for "bicycle only" parking and provided with sec - bicycle racks to the satisfaction of the City Pl — They shall be installed prior to occupancy. 10. All signs =.e exterior of the building or visible from the outsiu-, such as window signs, shall require Flanning Division approval in accordance with the Sign Ordinance. 11. No amusement device shall be used for purposes of or in connection with gambling. The winning of anything of value shall constitute gambling, except the winning of a prize in a scheduled tournament. 12. No persons shall be permitted to enter, be or remain in any part of the arcade while in the possession of, consuming, using or under the influence of any alcoholic beverage or drugs. This shall be prominently posted inside the arcade in letters not less than 1" in height and shall be enforced by the adult superviscr. 13. The walls, ceiling or floor, or any combination therecf, o the building or structure, or portion thereof, shall be insulated or otherwise constructed so that no vibration that is detectable without the aid of any mechanical device or instrument will be allowed to be on the outer perimeter of the arcade. 14. This approval shall become null and void if a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within 18 months from the date of approval, unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. This CUP shall be monitored and brought back to the Planning Commission within six (6) months from occupancy to review compliance with all Conditions of Approval and applicable City ordinances. Failure to comply with Conditions of Approval or applicable City Ordinances shall cause the suspension of the Conditional Use Permit and possible revocation of the Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. 15. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect at the time a Certificate of Occupancy is granted. E Resolution No. Page 4 16. This approval shall run with the applicant and shall become void upon a change of ownership or if the bisiness operation ceases. 17. The parking lot shall be posted "No Loitering" in letters not less than 1" in height on signs to the satisfaction of the City Planner and Sheriff's Department. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 1989— PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK. LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held in the 8th day of September 1982 by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E E E E Ll CITY OF RAINCHO C[,'CAN.UN�GA 9DkFF R.']TORT 1977 DATE: September 8, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Comnission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner Sl'BJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -17 - CHAFFEY COLLEGE - The (stab 3shment oT an $, square .)ot vocational trade school for the handicapped in the General Im ustrial Category to be located at 9375 9th Street and 8732 Helms avenue - APN 209- 031 -5G. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant. Ctaffe_v College, is requesting review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit to opperate a vocational trade facility for physically and /or mentally handicapped persons. The project site is located in a small industrial park at the southwest corner of 9th Street and Helms Avenue (Exhibit "A"). The site is designated on the General Plan and in the Industrial Specific Plan as General :ndustriai (Subarea 3). The college anticipates an enrollment of approximately 40 students and will provide four instructors with two or three teacher's aides. All class activity will occur inside the two suites wiich total. 8,518 square feet. Class times will be scheduled between the hours of 9 a.m. and 2:50 p.m. Monday through Friday. A-..t-oximately 9 parking spaces plus two loadir g zones are provided for the subject suites. The students will be transpo -ted to and from the site by mini -buses to reduce the number of parking spaces necessary for school operation. Current occupants of the industrial park include a variety of small businesses such as an accounting office, several custom marufacturers and an auto repair shop (Exhibit "B "). ANALYSIS: The oning Ordinance classifies th! proposed use as a special school and provides that one space be provided for each student and onE space for each instructor. Based on these requiremeits, the nine parking spaces provided would not allow for four instructors and fifteen students. Serious parking problems would result if students were not bussed to the facility. Cu.-rently, Chaffey College operates a much larger vocational skills training center for industrial technology just south of the project site at Feron Boulevard and Helms Avenue. Numerous parking problems have occured there in the past because of students parking in the streets and on private property. Special conditions of approval are recommended For the new training center under consideration to assure that similar parkinc problems are not created. ITEII H CUP82- 17 /Chaffey College Planning Commission Agenda September 8, 1982 Page 2 The Conditions of Approval include provisions for student transportation, limiting the number of parking spaces used by the facility to nine, establishino a maximum enrollment of 45 students, plus other conditions to protect surrounding property and "businesses. Operation of the school should not disturb adjarant businesses b2c3T ?se t classes are co ducted indoors and the students will be brought to the site at the same time in the morning and will all leave at the same time in the afternoon. A student lounge will be provided in the larger suite to the north for student activities during lunch periods and breaks. FACTS FOR FINDING: The proposed use is in accordance with the General Plan and the Industrial Specific Plan. The proposed use, together with the recommended Conditions of Approval would not be detrimental to the public welfare, safety, or environment. CORRESPONDENCE: A public hearing was advertised in The Daily Report newspaper and seven public hearing notices were sent to surrounding property owners within 300 feet of the subject sate. In addition, public hearing notices were delivered to each business in the industrial park. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: it is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and material relative to this project. A Resolution of approval with Conditions is provided for your review and consideraticn. ly Wbmitted, RICK GPMEZ Ity Planner G:CJ:jr 1Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Resolution of Site Plan Business Survey Approval with Conditions C-1 r . L C E u 0 Mountain Vezv Ind ustriaL Park Rancho Cucamonga D V#4r* 8,140 sq. ft. I 2.960 i 2.961 ffl 2 3h2 sq. ft. ; sq. ft [� I Y%AR'.rN4�AR' 1 7 JOW117VCSt corner of Ninth Strcct and Nc ?ttts At+ctutc Features: - Excellent frecztmy aces_ibility t+ concrete tilt -up construction • Irdrtstrinl suites include: • jprinklers • Office • Skv!ishts • Strip fluoresccrt lighting • Foil xrcpped ceilings 110 V. pemerdistriirrti ;nr in warciro. -S. • Hot zrn", am Srs CITY OF RANCHO CL'C -kN,IO\GA R.A 1NUNTG DI -NrMN 6 Blvd j .N 11 ►11r�L �" `J llarth Sate 2.:I 13,06b 3.520 sq. ft. sq. ft. 10 I •�....\ -1Llz St. Yf � i �\ - �� HELM= AVENUE JOW117VCSt corner of Ninth Strcct and Nc ?ttts At+ctutc Features: - Excellent frecztmy aces_ibility t+ concrete tilt -up construction • Irdrtstrinl suites include: • jprinklers • Office • Skv!ishts • Strip fluoresccrt lighting • Foil xrcpped ceilings 110 V. pemerdistriirrti ;nr in warciro. -S. • Hot zrn", am Srs CITY OF RANCHO CL'C -kN,IO\GA R.A 1NUNTG DI -NrMN 6 13 -.. Ia T VL.E-- Lcr-naa MAP =t SP•f't 'RAa.1 EXHIBM "�` SCALE- Fi.T.S_ Blvd j llarth Sate —I aril St. �� -1Llz St. � i San Bernardino F%vv. 13 -.. Ia T VL.E-- Lcr-naa MAP =t SP•f't 'RAa.1 EXHIBM "�` SCALE- Fi.T.S_ Mountain View Industrial Park Rancho Cucamonga MELMSAVENUE Suite 1 -- Subject unit Suite 2-- Shepley Mold and Engineering (custom manufacturing) Suite 3 -- Subject Unit Suite 4-- Fin -wall Enterprises (custom manufacturing) Suite 5 - -Auto Repair Suite 6 - -Mar /Art (Custom manufacturing) Suite 7 - -R.S. Development Company (office) Suite 8 -- Vacant Suite 9 - -V.M. Products (custom manufacturing) Suite 10- Southern California Filter (service only) Suite 11 -Air conditioning sales and service N 11 11 CITY OF iTEat: RANCHO CUCA-IO \�GA Trrr�: ,,,, �5 „� 0 PLA.NN1.NC DIVOON EXHII31T-�_ SCALE: RESOL'IV I Ivil irv. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVI19G CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82 -17 FOR CHAFFEY COLLEGE VOCATIONAL SCHOOL LOCATED AT 9375 9TH STREET AND 8732 HELMS AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY (SUBAREA 3) WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of August, 1982, a complete applicati -n was filed by Chaffey College for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 8th day of September, ":82, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -17 is approved subject to the fa owing conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Transportation must be provided to and from the site for all students by Chaffey College or by other means of public transportation not requiring on -site parking. 2. The maximium number of students enrolled in the programs offered at the site shall not exceed 45. 3. All class activities shall occur completely indoors. 4. Operation of the school shall not occur until all Uniform Building Code and Title 19 of the State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Resolution No. Page 2 5. Operation of the school shall not require more than the nine parking spaces allocated or cause adverse effects upon surrounding businesses. Should any problems arise, this C.U.P. will be brought back to the Commission for reconsideration and possible revocation of said permit. 5. Restrooms shall be provided inside each unit and a interior improvement plan shall be provided for review and approval by the Plannina nivisi ^.. 7. N3 outdoor storage of materials or equ"pment is permitted. 8. All City Codes and Ordinances shall be ccmplied with at all times. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUC.AMCNGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, 3ACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, anj adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a -eg.jlar meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS- NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E U r1 r 0 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: OF RAINCF.O CUCARIO,NGA STAFF BLEPORT SEPTEMBER 8, 1982 Members of the Planning COmmissi0n Ri,k Gomez, City Planner Michael Vairip., Senior Planner AND ZONI the required rear yard area to accessory structures. 1977 1ROINACE AMENDMENT 82 -04 - An 3 to allow a percentage of be used for additions and SUMMARY: At the direction of the Planning Commission, staff has prepared a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow accessory buildings and additions to occupy a certain percentage of the required rear yard area. Staff is recommending that the Plannina Commission consider this amendment and to recommend approval of the amendment to the City Council, as shown cn the attached Ordinance. ANALYSIS: Staff has found that the basic rear yard setback requirement for each of the residential zones does not allow any flexibility for portions of additions or accessory buildings to be 'ocated within any part of the required rear yard area. The oid County Code did permit a certain percentage of the rear yard to be used for accessory building use or additions. The original intent for the requirement of rear yards is to maintain a minimum amount of open space and recreational area. The amendment being proposed would allow up to a maxirrm of 30% of the rear yard to be used for accessory buildings or additions. This would still retain 70% of the required rear yard to be used for open space and recreation. As ar, example, a typical 7200 square foot lot which measures 60 feet in width by 120 feet in depth would be reauired to have a minimum 1200 square foot rear yard area. Based upon the proposed amendment, an addition can occupy up to a maximum of 360 square feet which is equal to an addition of appoximateiy 20 feet by 18 feet. Attached is a sketch of an R -1 -7200 square foot lot with a proposed addition and an R- 1- 20,000 square foot lot with a proposed accessory building. These sketches indicate that substantial additions can be made without variances, based on the proposed amendment. However, this amendment ITEM I Zoning Ordinance Amendment 82 -04 Planning Commission Agenda September 8, 1982 Page 2 also contains minimum rear yard and side yard setbacks For accessory buildings and additions in order to protect adjacent properties. Staff has completed an Initial Study on this amendment to determine whether or not this amendment could cause significant adverse environmental impacts and have found that such amendment would not cause significant environmental damage. FACTS FOR FINDING: The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan po ides regar ing residential development which state that there should be flexibility to deal with the various site constraints and a% opportunities. In addition, the proposed amendment would not have significant impact on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing item in The _Daily Report newspaper. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this proposal. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a pub is hearing to consider all aspects of this change. If the Commission concurs with the proposed amendment, then adoption of the attached Resolution, recommending approval of the amendment would be appropriate. RG:MV:jr Attachments: Example Sketches Proposed Ordinance Commission Resolution I] 11 E i � 1 e ! p 1 8 _o cc� � .p3 1 J O 1� sa� P1 0 J w 1 � ! 1 1 i i w a O Q N OC W J Q ! " 4 a � t C14 S M'PLE5 %I N6 MF06ED ENDMEKr OI ,t ,W-S! J O 1� sa� P1 0 J w 1 � ! 1 1 i i w a O Q N OC W J Q ! " 4 a � t C14 S M'PLE5 %I N6 MF06ED ENDMEKr OI ,t l 0 RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 8'L -04, AMENDING SECTIONS 61.0219(H)(2)(8) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW 30% USAGE OF REQUIRED REAR YARDS IN RESIDENTIAL ZONES FOR ADDITIONS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing to consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 82 -04; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has found it desirable to provide greater flexibility in the required rear yard setbacks. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project witl not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and has recommended issuance of a Negative Declaration on September 8, 1982. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 64854 to 65847 of the California Government code, the Planning Commission ® of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 8th day of September, 1982, of Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 82 -04. 2. That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zoning Ordinance Amendment No. 82 -04 as shown on the attached Ordinance. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission U Resolution No. Page 2 11 I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September, 1482, by the followinq vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: D- 0 E ORDINANCE NO. * AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 61.0219(H,1(2)(3) OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW 30' USAGE OF ADDITIONS AND RACCESSORYEBUILDINGSIN RESIDENTIAL ZONES FOR The City Council or the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, does ordain a follows: SECTION 1: Section 61.0219(h)(2)(B) of the Rancho Cucamonga Interim Zoning Ordinance Is hereby amended as follows: 61.0219(h) Area Requirements (2) Exceptions: Accessory buildings and additions: An accessory building or addition to the main building may occupy up to 30% of the required rear yard, based on the following criteria: (Q) (1) Height: Accessory buildings or additions in exceed height v.hen ated�tionythe r t required rear yard area. (2) Rear yard setback: Accessory buildings or additions may be placed to within 3 feet of the rear property line. (3) Side yard setback: Additions to the main building e d setback required by the basezoneor that of the existing building. Accessory buildings located at least 10 (ten) feet from the ma'n building may be located to within 3 feet of an interior side property line. (4) Front yard and side street yard: Accessory buildings or additions may not occupy any portion of a required front yard or side street yard area. SECTION 2: The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, hereby finds that this amendment wiil not cause significant adverse impacts on the environment and issues a Negative Declaration for this Amendment. Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Report, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1422. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Jon D. Mike s, Mayor Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk L� 11 0 CITY OF P.ANC,HO CUCAMONGA I14ITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before tiie public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project w-ll have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. 0 PROJECT TITLE: [J NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: M040 V LOCATION PO PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 0 ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND. PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF KNY: FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMEENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES) , ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING-PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Is the project par*_ of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? 1-2 1'J E] WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO _ _V/ I. Create a substantial change in c_round contours? 2. Create a substantial change in (existing noise or vibration? 3. Create a substantial change in temand for mZnicipal services (police, fir >, water, sewage, etc.)? 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations' _Z5. Remove any existing trees? HoF many? 6. Create the need for use or disjosal of potentially haz:.rdous material: such as toxic substances, flammables o) explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the constrLetion of residential units, complete the fo ;-m on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to tite best of my knowledge and belief.. I further understand tha: additional _ information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Reviev Committee. Date 3/ Signature , r Title -SQ4t: &WfrL- 1-3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRJCTICN The following infcraation should be provided to the Cite of Rancho Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the distri \ to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of DAIeloper and Tentative Tract No.: Soec.if?c Lo a ion of Project: \\ PFASF T DancE 2 PHASE 3 1. :dumber of single \ / family units: \ 2. Num -ber of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin. construction: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Mode! and = of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Range I -4 t,- PHASE 4 TOTAL El 0 CJ L] Lj CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: September 8, 1482 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Meredith Kaplan, Planning Aide SUBJECT: WEN AVENUE MEDIAN DESIGN GUIDELINES BACKGROUND: Following City Council and Planning Commission recommen- dations, staff has developed the Design Guidelines for the Haven Avenue median. Attached to this m.mordidum are the Haven Avenue Median Design Guidelines, which specifies Dlanting, irrigation, and paving stanat:rds for the median islands. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the Haven Avenue Median Design Guidelines and adopt the attached Resolut ion. 11*7submitted, ty !Planner :MK:jr Attachments: Haven Avenue Medan Design Guidelines Resolution ITEM J HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN D r e- C rr GUIDELINES a COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT O �e o° D . 0 C El 0 H A \\/ E- N Ati /ENuIF- "-T�- }>1 AN -Fn6 - 01 low tnj ro,GjGs ronfgtvi S- }"ar�darc�5 -r or' j►t"rt�c. --ion vviG�o; �4nc ho C vc4movigei fo } avev� �ercv�uG lavl- j-?,, addit-lovt -ro i9le -Se G1mzii5) 1cA-ie na-e, -one - 011ovitr) revim erf%5 1. 7 ie, +jr4�t c, ssI AYO 5'na I i be, c a��c ecf j � GuarAdvyce. v.►t4-� Gi i?���,ho Gvcav�a► � ,ri'undareli 314- +r6t -�ie, i�!a�d Tc�p� C (c r Tye A :Nvzye, ca1 v r Yt, . L trek') v�i►�� '�i- �ndarG{ 3 C..b a�Mcl. zS+avtdard ��3 }'ee( C� usd� Marker " }L 2&c +ty, Arff M I >c -f-or - 1'rtc5:e 51�-aMardmz> 2. f3ez ore �es�r���a� , �� �e G►� li- av�5�rra-�-toc� Y- AlirneEY -r f ace m.ew+ - -t-� c� 5►gna Is. 3• .�Ir if�i�}gf�o� c- on�st'rvr.�ioh sball cav�form -#'o (afes-� edif-iov, ::D nor s --r ,ca ravls s fybt:i✓ \Izr1 -5 Lruci -lon, 5e�'tovt �'n5. city of rancho cucamonga A\/ E N IZp' TO FII�T Tom! � �Sr-H SiVV� WE O M' CMANITE 5e->= t�l L_ 9ts"re 301 Gut v STANDARD DRAWING i-1 A \/ E N U 2G>i D.G. I iQr I- It PLoI+t-I HADhllH0lZr1E 1 4 .r rl-ANT V D -G- TNAN61UL ACt ,C-71''%GI N Ct V-mr--,I° le CA -EAJZ of tU741r, °t L&mHeq --&-T 'MME OF JANPA A0uTtc0Ll,&, "Gv° C-G. ON Ct:. Or- MEDIAt-I FDIr-- Lr-- ICiTH OF Mr;,VLc,,N 16 CjAL. - io I H1 MIN. N nTe-: ALL FiAm- im6w MATv:- n&--L- 6iAiL t3E For- stz� saner HEM= rH t�,Y THE c l-ry m AtiN if t i;—r rrtioie Tn t -A-t -m HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN: ?LAN � H 101 elty enquapr rs". 23889 n:te t NOT TO SCALE city of rancho cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING I— OoMmi-re- GOLD Joir-i-F � IF • e •a ° nom= 4f)r�Tr-UcT 151a"I-rv-� Lr-_vEL W/ Cur iU RT LjAt�1� ,iA -opt ins cum -r op � FOR SuF�AGE T �{�7F1U+Z1014S � S� dTi!!.'!� 51pB OF 'THI`•a �"{r. HA1iEN AVENUE MEDIAN: SECTION H 102 cftr *ngaa*r r.cw. 23689 Eat. city of rancho cucamonga STANDARD DRAWING Ho-sr �S: WN:M -rHr-r dal~fvtj,5l0I-t- K ^rrF<>c. S A2ZATE 1 rrL:-:- lti- . -rWo All V A FLp4 -MH41 AF4-=y. _ 2410 V4A- 4 -WP.YS 0 L ALL e0W N ITE 51� L.L ICE M- TALIX!,D 5Y A Q UAI_i F I e V COINTFONG-f ot2. 2. ALL NIT7: SHALL !3E 4 " —(a" iztVEI2 FoCK. 5MUTATr-t7 CxFj&NITE W1 I`IATURAL GIzOUT US)Ni!C AN OrEN- t<JNDW TOOL_ SITE 15AMrLJ,= AT eny of Rio c.UCA IMO GzAe MANNING= Derr a TM ekZ -DAtot 51- L I3F- NATIVE- 50IL COMPAGTI<3V Ttb A 5MoOTH, UNY15- LDINC4 15URFO&C-E =- o1z Till:SU�tIT�.DE T'Ff TMEMT OF nir-- 110be A-14 7 GOLD JoINTS.4 THE. ornieF- SINE of THiS som, -T. 4 T+M 5LA13 5KNL4- 1'e 4" TWIG- US]NGa NOKMAL- Mix, Dr-4141N OF MINUS 391 AC4GF�4ATB . 5. A WFAKENEn MANE. of Z.5 7o of StAS Oil) St-W.L Br,- WOr, IrVEF-Y 151 Alit? SI-tAU.- I= >UoW 7HE. GONTO W Iz5 of THIr Focla F oP p" M _ BQMANITE DETAIL: Cr •paw.. ►.t.t. 23889 daft I HOSE . AND PLANTING AREA H.T H 1 ©3 city of rancho cucarnonga a i3I8 G.D. t:GOMomy STANDARD DRAWING CcALV. IF-Oty l°I p F P--No. ?-C> 6A W1 1 M I N -rl4l,E7r me- PLAN �Uh I-'C'rt WjMg-: -fi KOUGH lH evPOSI't cif GTi olyS ,o,;eal �t`4b l°I MK . -T W 1,,�r-T FIP STp.KES S1iALL D3E pt2E —D ILLI;rj AND FAIN-ME7 fop-eST 5r12r-�N. 5F-6T'lON CIA L- M I H. Ti2-r-� NOT F-00 $pUND7 71aAcEI-;2 Zol O.G. wo 1% ,g ECONOMY Cv,LV IKzo1j 5TAK4-=5 JGN STP g p�° 1�1 -LPL TU L 5 � r- T. 'FAKEA MIH. of Iv, IIiT0 UN)7iSTURf?,�b h01 L-. TlEf---, CSF� PLPJ�I .o,re) Til= i�UNK �B' A��E i3�hir�IHC� MCM HT of -r MUL4,- Fj I 15rpM FULLY N 15H C,PAvi= !OM rAC:rrr -V ,GY -.P�I LL- � �p>� I,rii?c 51=E - ilzUl3 b�`i -AIL ) METAL, TREE STAKING DETAIL � H 105 `t__ caeaer r e e. s36Ee d�t� 'h;O TO SCALE city of rancho cucamonga V1�L4'E 43vX W % LacK p��ISI0 t'4 Ljno1?5 5 TIME PiA• cr- MAIM UNE-7 F-A r--FA-C4' hE42+C-5 C4aL 1 (elf (°!°� -- -� ex4° PWWcDr M -cocv- C-�v g0° F-Ll - aALV. Nlt°I°I.J: Col`{Tt�L- Ccpl -aR TO CONTFaU -EiK- city aa9Uaar r.cs. 23889 date MAJH WNW F-'ITT[NCI STANDARD DRAWING �)F 6'CJMSGT01:7� 57-03 D PT - 55 GmAm TDW ti KLEiz AN61L 5� FII E TO } W1;H 466 Ells 1 CU PT PEA 6ir�vEL coK1M0N WllzI!l murm) M bTHBF VA VE5 bN '5 r F, G0N71l?0LLEF- ELECTRIC CONTROL VALISE X6106 city of rancho oucamonga >r �> v _= Z iL �V V 0 lu Ll 3 '4 ON ul as 10 1 � U NJ N STANDARD IL j� h i n i a �U '4 ON ul as 10 1 � U NJ N STANDARD IL j� � n O 111 �! 3 aj al D v 3D DL 115 � e � o Q .,f Z `l L �Oi> 2 Q > ZL I DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEMBLY � H 107 Ctty a ^9�eeer C.O. 23889 tlate KQT TO SCALE 0 city of rancho cucamonga I 1t Z. STANDARD DRAWING •��S'T,6•L MOt,aNTEi� AUTOMATOG �- L�Tl2.1G- GONTI�OL1._�.1z- L�GKiP"!U Doo12 Wl!�E ;7rlJl0V- ^ rn;r4- t2" EXPANSIO2`f LOCI EotH WIRE- IZC YoL.T Wi�E IN CONDUIT !-Jv -4 5H GRYI-V� rocq viw LASE �D NO-M-0. yF-F4. C-T r,DNTF2oU -iriZ WHIGH iS U�- iG91`i� !Z IIS� WITH "TT!`IrAC>Mp_:Te12-j�-) /1:4&.NyENF -7 RG -iZ5, ISL°i, Z216 OF- EQUAL_). THF-- EI- EGTwcp.L_ Mr--TVE12 5i-tf i..1_ 13E r-Uu-`r r-r CL-Co EX) (MyEgS I:i- trL"r�iG �i20DUGT6, INC. GA'1 :9= ME -L 6t S i ES otZ ArrF-nvt;o V-gUIVAi-FM-F). AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER DETAIL � H 108 enr anpinsor r o.o, 2 888 date I HnT TA SCALE city of rancho cucamonga ELK nl? ,-I lv' m MA zLEx 6T;zEET STANDARD DRAWING STxE�M �✓�'r'zAY Hr-Ar %&JH51Izv I.N SS -35° TFAJV.cTOr-y ° J � n P .A � N A Nt�>H eA- -rn; S�t-i- 4p /Z GLlt3lG EooT Gc�NGIZET is C; Lv STF F- E-I- F i r u tVOU51e 3WIS4.1 JT. L&TI:Iza�- ur-+E F'ITrjH( No-trp,=: ALL- SPF;?A7 I ft:Ain Si'�LL fit: 51;1 - TED fsl-tD PLAG�p TO AC- HIEI(1= ��oMt�LET cov r E WITH No c�v T ff�ow. rNTREAM SPRAY HEAD - SWING JGINI H 1 09 Ctty �eeglnNr o.23889 Oster OT TO SCALE city( of rancho cuc4- amonrga STANDARD DRAWING cu9n DR qu1oK count. -er- P-Aji,owv 33P —LYG .er-tES 5PAC-r-V EveT-Y 100' rlt4I5f -t Cai bE 14 cu. 5-r C0N cF-F--rte STAt31 L.lZ� 6V-a: /- NlrF -r- 5CH. 40 rvG STFet�T r--1 L6 s-, Ft. Bo VWN LINE l70UB1 F SWthtG J01N iF Ae:lr SLY QUICK COUPLER - SWING JOINT euy an9iaaar r.e a. 23889 data I NOT TO H 110 city of rancho cucamonca (Z') AWci ut= -� 16 acv— ppkvjpf-:� AtiD eFc-- MTITMY (C CoNsfCTORS AT To lie- WiR,D ffV% STANDARD ®RAWIN 2 WINS, oV LAWiEle FOOM fit° wtx� a2cPANSI0H W"r1 pox L3.,�L 1!f t3oX. L=== To C MT1zOLLEr- OFz VALVE f'LA6TIG (AME't'Eit )13oX No LO -170 -003 W,Tff Lagv, Tbr, vovr< -No. P� 15OXA440 Gr7w1: -r- t 1ocnn. -7 1;=o12- �rf`50!z IIiSTAL1AT1ON n lIWCIETE12 427- SEA IFf4C 4F-T M SALES MF. Fo121tfSTIEUr-TeONS Mlot✓ Tc INSTAL- !/' -TtON . r=IHI'5H CIR&De- �� � : � 1Z�' Il�OMETE z T'UI� ALiToh�a9 iG CTIaA.) MOISTURE yE qSoR 012 agUAJ -. le 1121 5-lEL STAHMA4zp 441rOMA-i1G CiP-4) �} MDI,$Tu;er-- 5E iSolz or- EquA - . / CONDUIT To c aliTXOLLEI2 om vALVr- r DF pIEZ-5, �f7AVEL 61�:T ION NG7TES: Tr:r'SIOMF- L. S !H "THf- r-OCYT ZONa Or A t°L -r AHO RY AN 1R}z1t+AT1:D A4--PEA . NOT py OVE{2R Ncilticl 1 KAW- fir:C- olz FLQoDEb 5Y RUH -OFF. Z.TWo T�ri51oMETEJ�S sl }ey.a_ gE IfiST.�J Eb Af Fi, C4 LDC,&, TION WITH TWO LOGATiOhuj� MlF4it�(uM� mm C-&4Tf?oiJ-EI¢-. 3- LDCa.TIo"S S({,e}.11• M tGEGaDE:> oN a GASE 1!C ASS 1.5i�2115 WITH ADVIG.e OF "iYJE IK'KOMETElZ 60- 074) &&)-•1701) 4K cr-HaR quAL11%IEED MFr 1 U Fi6G.Ti1t2�Jz . 4.1:t ELilzlC AL 1VAp5 S}y44-1- pr-- pLAZE'yo'*} �E KA' "UHF= mrlpUIT 114 TAHCx6M WITS' T1tt_ VAll"E C-"--'HTRoL 1N1F-E6 A40 lbEN-nj=1Eb 5Y 'SWAFt &TE. WIRE COLOTL . 5. A F-F�C :ULAFQ- [,IONTHL`r Mgj�{•�Gt- plza:�IZA 1 51'IA.LL. G'STPBLi'�HEb Atom SooH Ac, TEJiSt0MB'rM4Zs . tl ss� t -Ep• WtlFrJ Tl tE C�c`1 fRf'GTO12'S HTE'iAt IGE 0C>5Ll6vaTl0N IS GJMPi- ETEt7, 7F!f-� "fCtiSloME:TE1¢ �Ic12V1GE SEjAJ -L 3E �uRN I SHED -ro TkE "TY NW NTEN, 5-HC E. {��!'a1zTMEl�iT SOIL MOISTURE TELNSIO:VIETER CHY Onginver r.e.e. 23 889 tl^N DETAIL NOT TC SCALE c '' �'.'. • .,..� ;. .. , _��, _ _ .. � �' f t �_ k � f C _. city of rancho- cucamoacra R/W STANDARD DRAWING W P A A- I — A I VARi MITL � I A I SW—{ 6'MIN. { LEVEL I �flpc+. urfE ..— �°J ? U kJ 2 MIN.(MAY VARY) �iL GRADE SEE STD. NO. 303 .AJO. BASE A.0 PVYIT SEE 4FX. NQ:ES (EICUOTES TYPiCAL ROADWAY SECTION KetML V DESIGNATION R/N/ W I P A 8 C D E� STTJG SEC. AL' %ASE" -��pii T.1. INDUSTRIAL 54' 44' 5- If 4 /S. 9 g0 .67 .ac 33 LOCAL 50' 36' 1? 9' ( 1 ao 3 /4" _1 I 67 .39 I COLLECTOR 1 66' I tt' 11' 11' SPECIAL DESIGN 3"/ 67 ? SECONDARY 188. 64' 17 16' ldAJaR 2' I 14' ! 18' 6••/ 6• s•/ 5" 9 9 1DfY1D =_D MAJOR 120' 94' I IT GENERAL NOTES 1, A.C_OVERLAYS E FINISH COUP.SES,MIN.OS;C2 -AR -4000. BASE COURSES ML"L0.15' B -AR -4000 2. Thickness shall be as determined by soils report, traffic index and Street_ des i gnat i On, PREPARED EY SOILS ENGINEER PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS. NO RECOMM.ENOM SECTION ;HALL BE LESS THAT? THAT SHCWN IN TABLE ABOVE. 3. CRUSHED BASE SHALL BE EITHER AGGREGATE Or SLAG 4. A. C. MAY BE SUBSTITUTED FOR BASE AS DETERMINED BY SOILS ENGINEER. AT NO TIME CAN BASE 6E LESS THAN 4" 5. SLAG C AGGREGATE BASES AND AC. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDI.1ON Or THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CvNSTRUCTION. ;' e I ROADWAY SECTION 1201 city of rancho cacamongra '/2 R �CJRY LINE SLOPE � L uSl. n GEMEt.Ai. VOTFC: M,jj 6 °C.F. *6° `, " 11 •1. & .- 1, Weakened plane joints shall be constructed not more than 10 feet apart. 2. All curbs shall be constructed in accordance with the latest coition of the STD_ SPECS. FOR PUBLIC WORKS CO "ST, unless otherwise indicated. * 6'* C.F MAY EE USED WITH APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER CURB ONLY 8.. C. F. 301 City of rancho Cucamonga CENTERLINE STREET 1, STANDARD DRAWING LANE LINE� 35' 101 4' R .......................... . • _ _ ' _�.��. S FLARE f VARIABLE TYPE A LANE LINE ! CE RE- 10' ST - L_ lS FLARE 3• VARIABLE "'PE 8 LANE ARIAPJL. 6245' iVAR; LINE— Y I :SIFLAPP -e TYPE C Slt' Ip• I•R FLARE --1'R L MEDIAN ISLAND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH STD. 301 CURB[,ETAIL ALL DIMINSIONS ARE TO F L. OF CURB FACE. 1� i RAFFF-1c ISLAND �r nv Ica. 314 1o.3s' z; s' S IB' CURB CURVE DATA ! 0-I 2 R = 1004 R =100' O!R O' �--- -- As23'SB'30"1 t =� °11'42' - T= 1429' T= 23D8' T =1fi0!' L= 1 =4233' L=3LTI' .. _ - 1 Ft L MEDIAN ISLAND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH STD. 301 CURB[,ETAIL ALL DIMINSIONS ARE TO F L. OF CURB FACE. 1� i RAFFF-1c ISLAND �r nv Ica. 314 El u city of rancho Cucamonga GALVANIZED STEEL CONFORMING WITH A.S.T.M. AUS GRADE C LRD A.S.LM. A122. 21 mi�ijl, ' Y AA 7 DETAIL -A- SEE DETAIL "A- VGE 1 7/16" TM� Lfe- SECTION n -A J't' LENGTH FOR TYPE -K-MARKER STEEL MARKER POST 9 -76a YELLOW OR RED PEFLECTORS OR AEFLECTIVc IAEET'IMG CMRMG_ e o O \O O C O�e STEEL MARKER �((Cti� T4lCE�4��!F 2 r! TYPE -N- MARKER GENERAL METES: STANDARD DRAWING _ S- A- YELLOW -•--IS REFLECTORS g OO STEE� TS- MARKER POST � I I i 22- I I I � � TYPE -K' MARKER Q -1 zc- j r- 1 2. STEEL MARKER POST TYPE "L MARKER 1. All marker and Cost details shall conform to the State of California Department of Trtmpo.tatiDh Standard Plans. (\7� e 'j 4/y SRr ,0".ft"1 cu- STE`L GUIDE MARKER 403 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION STANDARDS FOR HAVEN AVENUE MEDIAN ISLANDS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds that it is necessary to set standards for Haven .Avenue median landscaping and irrigation to implement General Plan policies_ WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Guidelines attached to this Resolution and has found that these standards are the minimum necessary to implement the intent and purpose of the General Plan. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMAISSION HEREBY: 1. Adopts the attached Haven Avenue Median Design Guidelines; and 2. Finds that such standards are the minirmim necessary to implement the intent and purpose of the General Plan. 0 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF P_ANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAY, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of September, 1982 by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 0 E 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 8, 1982 70: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner By: Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner SUBJECT: STATUS OF DRAFT ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN City staff has completed production of the Draft Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Plan is now available for public distribution and comment. Staff has held two workshops with the Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Committee to discuss all components of the draft Plan. Their input has been useful in helping to complete modifications on the draft Plan prior to printing of the full document. The document is divided into two pa which has already been reviewed b review process. Part H contains t! Policies. A more detailed outline In addition, staff is now preparing will be available for public review by the Planning Commission and City rts. Part I consists of the Policy Plan, Y the Advisory Camtnittee through public ie regulatory provisions to implement Plan of the text is enclosed with this report. a Draft Environmental Impact Report which as the draft Plan goes forward for review Council. The Etiwanda Specific Plan Advisory Corrnittee has scheduled a public meeting for Saturday, September 11, 1982, 10:00 a.m. in the Lions Community Center to review the Plan and to take public input. This meeting will be an all day session 'an order to provide the greatest opportunity for public input and Committee response. If necessary, the Committee has scheduled another meeting for Tuesday, September 21, 1982, 7:00 p.m., at the Lions Community Center for consideration of any additonal changes. We anticipate that the review process by the Advisory Committee will be focused on specific details which are of limited sccpe, thereby assuring completion of the review as scheduled. Following the Ce-mnittee's actions, staff will make final changes and prepare the docunzani for preseaation to the Planning Commissicn. ITEM K Status of Etiwanda Specific Pian Planning Commission Agenda September 8, 1982 Page 2 It is anticipated that the document will be presented to the Commission in mid - October and that several meetings will be required to review both Parts I and H. The recommendations of the Planning Commission will then be forwarded to the City Council for review and adoption. 11y submitted, RICK OMEZ, City Planner RG:OK:jr Attachments: Draft Etiwanda Specific Plan 11 E IM ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN CONTENT The Etiwanda Specific Plan draft text consists of two major parts: PART I is the foundation of the Plan as it contains policy decisions about major components of the document. Part 1 includes: CHAPTER l: INTRODUCTION, introduces the document and contains the necessary legal provisions. CHAPTER 2: SETTING, describes the project area setting and outlines the areas of concern and potential problems. CHAPTER 3: GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES, identifies (1) what the Specific "i` �c Plan is trying to accomp ish, and (2) defines a set of ground rules to be used in developing appropriate solutions in each of the topic areas. CHAPTER 4: CONCEPTUAL PLAN', (1) outlines the evoluticn of several concepts That form the basis of the Plan, and (2) presents an over- all picture, in conceptual terms, of what the various Plan components do and how they are inter °eiated. PART II contains regulatory provisions necessary to carry out the policies and concepts. Part II consists of: CHAPTER 5: STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS, is designed to stand on its own in that it contains a substantial portion of what a person needs to know in order to submit a development proposal in Etiwanda, in- cluding detailed deveiopmer'C standards. CHAPTER 6: IMPLEMENTATION, contains a description of how the pro- visions o` the Plan may be implemented. In addition, a Draft Environmental Impact Report is being prepared by the staff.