No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982/11/10 - Agenda Packet ,o i ter:: c� '• My Or ItANC 1H�O1�CLr-Ai%IO�,A T� �T c 1 0 ]PL 1VT'pi��T�1_�lls C©i�riLvilSJ��1� AGENDA 1977 WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 10, 7982 7:05 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE,. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ACTIONS 1. Pledge of Allegiance II. Roll Cali Commissioner Barker X _ Commissioner Rempel X Commissioner King X Commissioner Stout X Commissioner McNiel X III. Approval of Minutes Approved 5-0-0 September 22, 1982 Approved 4-0-0-1 October 13, 7982 IV. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calezelar items are expected to- be routine and iron-controversial. They will be acted on by the Q=missi'cn at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. Approved 5-0-0 A. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 6596 V. Puhiic Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. please wait to be recognized by the Chairmar and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Continued to 1/26/83 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN ENE 82-03 - INTERSTATE CONSOLIDATED - iv A request to amend the General Plan Land Use ' Map from Medium Residential (4-14 dwelling units/acre) to Commercial on approximately 8.9 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Ramona and Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077-621-31 . (Continued from (tanning Commission meeting of September 22, 1982) Planning Commission Agenda Wednesday, November. 10, 1982 Page 2 Continued to 1/26183 to study C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 3383 - access and drainage. BFiNKS - The division of 5 acres of land into 4 ia�ts within the R-1 zone located approximately 660' north of Base Line aad 660' West of East Avenue - APN 227-131-29. (Continued from Plan- ning Commission meeting of September 8, 1982) Approved 4-1-0 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 8 - 6 - SUBAREA 16 MASTERP - SAFEWAY - ronceptual review of the proposed Master Plan for Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan which is located between 4th and 6th Streets, and between Hellman and Archibald Avenues. Continued to 11/22/82 E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PEWMIT 82-18 - HOOK) - The development of a c urcch facility incTuiding two buildings which total 4,200 square feet on 5.5 acres of land in the R-1-20,000 zone located at the north- east corner of Archibald Avenue and Wilson Avenue - ADN 201-831-01'. Approved 5-0-0 F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 82-03 BID" L - A change of zone from R- (Single Fa -Residential) to R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) for 2.02 acres of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street - APN 202-131.-61 & 62. Approved 5-0-0 with added restriction ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT n CC&P,s concerning blocking of Barer- 12256 - 6IDCAL - The development of 25 condo- gency access. min�um units on 2.i3 acres of land in the R-1 zone (R-3 pending) located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista Street - APN 202-131-27, 61 & 62. Approved 4-1-0 H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COXXTIONAL USE PERMIT 82-20 - SHARMA - The development of a 3,691 square toot elementary scl cool on 3/4 acres in the R-1 zone located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard - APN 208-241-09. 4r r Planning Commission Agenda Wednesday, November 10, 1982 Page 3 Y JI, Public Co:ments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Ztems to be discussed her are those which do not already appear on this agenda. VI. Adjournment The P2an_ting Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an Il p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. The Planning Commission will adjourn to November 18, 1962 to discuss the Draft Etiwanda Specific Plan. consensus of the Commission was to cancel the regular meting of 12/22/82 due to holiday conflicts. Adjourned to 11/18/82 at 7 p.m. for a continued public hearing on the Etiwanda Specific Pian. y t 1 r, I T IT Y MAC i : • : e f i i r { . > ; «� fFrr •4 co•uo¢ . , , Fo MUNN Y F . C • W • e E ' 0 • s 8; _7 At a o • E fYCA+ CA-wA%T. CO"rl •fMOw.• •.iw ONTA•IO AT[Yw.1101. .YI/0•T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAmOWA 1 CL-CA Al(), V/ c� C17A, CF r > RANCHO CLKWMa ZA o PLANNING COMMISSION $ z AGENDA 1977 WEDNESDAY NOVEMBER 10, 1982 7:00 P.M. LION'S PARK COMMUNITY CEir'TER 9161 BASE LINE,. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA I. Pledge of Allegiance IT. Roll Call Commissioner Barker Commissioner Rempel Commissioner King Commissioner Stout. Commissioner McNicl 1 III. Approval of Minutes September 22, 1982 October 13, 1982 IV. Consent Calendar The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted on by the Commission at one time without discussion.. rf anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion.. A. TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 6596 V. Public Hearings The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission from the public microphone by giving your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per y" individual for each project. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN 7sh-iE-NDMENT 82-03 - INTERSTATE MNSOMDATE-n - A. request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium Residential (4-14 dwelling units/acre) to Commercial an approximately 8.9 acres of land located on the northeast corner . ,- of Ramona and Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077-621-31. (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of September 22, 1982) � �u 4. Ire 7 i Planning Commission Agenda Wednesday, November 10, 1982 Page 2 . C. ENVIP.ONN`ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 3383 - BANKS - The division of 5 acres of land into 4-Tots within the R-1 zone located approximately 660' north of Base Line and 660' Nest of East Avenue - APN 227-131-29. (Continued from Plan- ning Commission meeting of September 8, 1982) D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW - SUBAREA MASTER PLAN - SAFEwAY - Conceptual review of the proposed Master Plan for Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan which is located between 4th and 6th Streets, and between Hellman and Archibald Avenues. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-18 - HOWARD - The development of church facility Tnc u tiag two buildi—s which total 4,200 square feet on 5.5 acres 0f land in the R-1-20,000 zone located at the north- east corner of Archibald Avenue and Wilson Avenue - APN 201-831-01 . F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZPNE CHANGE 82-03 ID - cFange of zone from R- (Single a_U y Residential) to R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) for 2.02 acres of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street - APN 202-131-61 & 62. G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12256 - 6IDCAL - The development of 25 condo- ;T- n n units on 2.10 acres of land in the R-1 zone (R-3 pending) located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista Street - APN 202-131-27, 61 & 62. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-20 - SHARMA - The development of a 3,691 square o0t a ementary school on 3/4 acres in the R-1 zone located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard - APN 208-241-09. a , y ' i r. t Planning Commission Agenda Wednesday, November 70, 1382 Page 3 . i� %ri. Public Comments This is the time and place for the general puoZic to address the Concession. Items to be discussed s �14ere are those which do not a]ready appear agenda. VI. Adjournment Co=.i. g ssioa has adopted Administ- The Plannin � ive The P2tions that set an 11 p.m. adjournment time. pxgd that time, they shall be heard if items go beyon only with the consent of the Commission. 1982 The plan ning Co=jss.ion will adjourn oPloan°e to discuss the Draft gtiwanda Specific s , L . ` 1:M ilh 4 ,. . VICINITY' MAP iLJ i i .—•—.—.—.—� CaLLScs P-4 S CYYs•v .. ---- _ e.r.Li rL� V i �� 'LIpY q4 pT1a N.Lt • • I e • � a•. S j9 •Yw� s E r CYCw�••G•-CuaS Tr Co"" .•C"Cw.L waN t CNrM10 •rrFRYw1KYa1 .V..ppr. l � Crry OF RAteCHO Ct$CA&gop# iA 1, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting September 22, 1982 CALL :13 ORDER Chairman Jeff King called the Requiar meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California to order at 7:05 p.m. The meeting was held at Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Chairman King then led in the pledge of allegiance. ROLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: David Barker, Larry McNiei, Herman Rempel, Dennis Stout, Jeff King ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None STAFF PRESENT: Rick Gomez:, City Planner; Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner; Jack Lam, Community Development Director; Janice Reynolds, Secretary; Paul Rougeau, Senior Civil Engineer APPROVAL OF !MINUTES Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Stout, unamiously carried, to approve the Minutes of August 11, 1982. ANNOUNCEMENTS Jack Lam, Community Development Director, announced that a meeting to discuss the Fcothiil Community -Piro- would be held September 27, 1982, at Lions Park. Community Center. Mr. Lam Also announced that there would be an Advisory Commission meeting September 23, 1982 at Lions Community Center to install new Advisory Commissioners. Vice-Chairman Herman Rempel presented a plaque to the Commission which was awarded to the City by the American Planning Association for the Industrial Specific Plan developed by City staff. 4; r ' PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 3383 - BANKS - The division of 5 acres of land into 4 ots within 'che R-1 zone oca:ed approximately 660' north of Base Line and 660' west of East Avenue - APN 227-131-29. Rick Gomez, City Planner, stated that the applicant requested continuance of this item to the Planning Commission meeting of October 13, 1982. Chairman King opened the public hearing. There were no comments, therefore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Rempel, uanmiously carried, to continue Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 3383 to the meeting of October 13, 1982. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 82-04 - An amenament to Section h B to allow a percentage of the required rear yard area to be used for additions and accessory structures. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Commissioner Rempel, asked if the three feet mentioned in the ordinance referred the roof line or the structure. Mr. Gomez replied that staff meant the three feet to be measured from the structure. Commissioner Rempel stated that if a structure with a thirty inch overhang was placed three feet from the property line it would be within eighteen inches from the property line, which he felt was too close. Mr. Gomez replied that staff could be directed to reword that section of the ordinance to stipulate five feet with a maximum eighteen inch overhang. Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, stated that from a drafting perspective it would be best to separate section one of the ordinance into accessory buildings and building additions rather than just adding the building addition language to the existing section. Chairman King opened the public hearing. There were no public co :, -•ts, therefore the public, nearing was closed. Commissioner Rempel stated that he would suggest that the proposed o-,finance be amended to include height limits on accessory buildings and additions, the inclusion of language suggested by staff, and that the -ear anti side yard setbacks be amended to five feet with a maximum two foot overhang. Planning Commission Minutes -2- September 22, 1982 k 4:' Commissioner Barker stated that requiring a five foot setback would be taking a rather large portion of a narrow yard. Further, that if the overhead encroachment was protected, he could not agree with a five foot setback. Chairman King stated that he agreed with Commissioner Barker in regard to the side yard setback; however, that allowing a two-story addition was totally inappropriate because it is against the Interim Zoning Ordinance as it relates to open. space. Further, that with the present wording of the ordinance he would be totally against allowing any two-story addition unless the wording was revamped relating to the increased review of a proposal for a two-story structure addition. Commissioner Rempel stated that he disagreed with Chairman King and felt that z person with a two-story home should be allowed to add on to his home the same as any other homeowner. Motion: Moved by Rempel that the ordinance be brought back to the Comnission with the minor encroachment provisions to be five feet on a two-story addition to an existing two-story home, and that the setbacks on the accessory buildings be three feet, setbacks on any addition shall be five feet, and that the high point of any roof line should be at the ratio of 2:1 from the side yard. Chairman King called for a second to this motion. There was no second to this motion and a motion was made by Commissioner McNiel. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stout, carried, to continue this item and that the ordinance be referred to staff for rewriting which would reflect the above discussion. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: McNiel, Stout, Barker, Rempel NOES: COMMISSIONERS: King ABSENT: C"ISSIONERS: None Chairman King voted No because he does not feel two-story additions should be allowed. C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-19 - ZWISSLER - The establishment of 13,232 square feet of professional offices in an existing building and the continuance of a preschool use in an existing building 5,644 square foot building on 4.39 acres in the General Industrial category located at 8968 Archibald Avenue - APN 209-171-15. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Planning Commission Minutes -3- September 22, 1982 Chairman King opened the public hearing. Bruce Zwissler, applicant, addressed the Commission stating that he would like to have the opportunity to work with staff in the revision of his plan so that he could be allowed 134 students instead of the 72 allowed under the plan as proposed. There were no further public comnen`, ":1refore the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Si - anamiously carried, to continue Conditional Use Permit 82-19 to the Planning Commission meeting of October 13, 1982 to allow the applicant time to work with staff on site plan revisions. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 82-03 - INTERSTATE CONSOLIDATED - A request to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Medium esidential (4-14 du/ac) to Commercial on aoprozimately 8.9 acres of Tana located on the northwest corner of Ramona and Foothill Boulevard - APN 1077-621-31. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Scott Bell, representing Interstate Consolidated, addressed the Commission stating that they were in favor of continuing this item to the Planning Commission meeting of November 10, 1982 to allow the applicant and the surrounding property owners time to meet and gather input regarding the site plan. There were no further public comments and the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Stout, unamiously carried, to continue General Plan Amendment 82-03 to the Planning Commission meeting of November• 10, 1982. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS E. REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE FOR ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN Tim Beedle, Senior Planner, presented the tentative public hearing schedule for the Etiwanda Specific Plan to the Commission. After discussion, the Commission reached a consensus to adopt the public hearing schedule as proposed by staff with a change in the final hearing date from December 22, 1982 to January 12, 1983. Planning Commission Minutes -4- September 22, 1982 F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 - BOARS HEAD - A report on the establishment ocate wit in t e shopping center on t e northwest corner of 19th Street and Carnelian. Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed the Staff Report. Chairman King advised the audience that although this was not a public hearing item this evening, the Commission would appreciate any public input. Mel Futrell, 6623 Topaz, addressed the Commission stating that he wished to thank the Commission for their action in trying to alleviate the problem their neighborhood has with the Boars head. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, unamiously carried, to hold a public hearing within thirty days of this date to consider revocation or modification of Conditional Use Permit 78-03. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Barker, seconed by Stout, unamiously carried, to adjourn. 8:50 Planning Commission Adjourned Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -5- September 22, 1982 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting October 13, 1932 CALL T�ER The regular meeting of the City of Pancho Cucamonga Planning Commission was called to order by Vice-chairman, Herman Hempel, at 7 p=12- The meeting was held at the Lions Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road. Vice-chairmar. Hempel then led in the Fledge of allegiance. POLL CALL PRESENT: COMMISSIONERS: E. Dav Hempel Barr, LarryNiel, Dennis Stout , Hermo ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Jeff•ey King STAFF PRESENT: Ilan Coleman, Associate Planner; Rick Gomez, City Planner; Edward Hopson, Assistant City Attorney; Otto Kroutil, Associate Planner; Joan A. Kruse, Administrative Secretary; Paul RouAeau, Senior Civil Engineer; Michael Vairin, Senior Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Mc:Niel, carried unanimously, to approve the Minutes of the August 25, 1982 Planning Commission meeting as corrected. Notion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to approve the Minutes of the September 8, 1982 Planning Commission as amended. ANNOUNCEMENTS Vice-chairmac. Hempel stated that the hearings on the Etiwanda Specific Plan would begin on September 21 at the Lions Park Community Center. He stated that the Planning Commission would ad.journ to that meeting. i i i i i PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACID PARCEL MAP N0. 3353 - BANKS - The division o!' 5 acres of land into 4 lots within the R-1 zone, located approximately 660, north of Base Line and 660' west of East Avenue - APN 227-131-29 (Continued from the September 22, 1932 Planning Commission Meeting) . Vice-chairman Rempel stated that the applicant has requested removal of this item from tonight's agenda. Be indicated that the item would be brought before the Commission at their November 10, 1982 meeting. Vice-chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mrs. Alice Flocker, owner of property that backs up, but is not adjacent to the Banks' property, stated her concern regarding the lot spLt because of drainage and the inadequacy of the street, indicating that it is barely one lane and needs ;o be expanded. Mrs. Flocker further stated that she felt nothing should be done tc property located within the boundaries of the Etiwanda Specific Plan until its adoption. There being no ±further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to continue this item to the November 10, 1982 Planning Commission meeting- B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 62-19 - ZWISSLER - The establishment of 13,232 square feet of professional offices in an existing building and the continuance of a preschool use in an existing 5,644 square foot wilding on 4.39 acres in the General Industrial category, located at 8968 Archibald Avenue - APN 209-171-15 (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of September 22, 1982) . Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Vice-chairman Rempel opened the public hear;mg. Mr. Bnuc,�t Zwissler, applicant, concurred with the staff recommendations. There beinj; no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Me Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 82-91 , approving Conditional Use Permit No. 82-19. C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82-15 - MANNELLA - A request to relocate the previously approved arcaee location from 6652 Carnelian to 6642 and 6646 Carnelian in the Rancho ?iaza Shopping Center. Dan Coleman, Associate Planner, reviewed the staff report. Oommissioner Stout asked why an 11 p.m. closing time had been left out of the &fsolution and requested that, the resolution reflect operating hours. Mr. MsnnelIa, the applicant, asked that the record show that many liquor storei still have four game machines operz.:; _ng and asked that the City enforce the provisions of the Arcade Ordinance. Thee being no further comments, the p.:bl--2 hearing was clob--d. Planning Commission Minutes -2- October 13, 1982 Ccmmissioner Barker stated that Mr. Marrella's operation had been used to establish a base .for comparing arcade operations. He further stated that hereafter Mr. ManneIa's-Conditional Use Permit would be used to compare any other similar arcade requests so that no ore will have a competitive edge. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 82-83A approving the relocation Sri tiee arcade and further amending Resolution No. 82-88 to reflect operating hours until 11 p.m. D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82-22 - FRITZ - The estab?ishment of a 3200 square foot indoor auction service in the General Industrial category (Subarea 4) , located in the Scheu Business Center at 9155 Archibald Avenue, Spite 301 - APN 209-211-21 . City Planner, Rick Gomez, reviewer' the staff report. Commissioner Barker asked how many automobiles will be kept in the parking lot. Mr. Gomez replied teat only a few will be kept; however, the applicant would be in a better position to explain. Vice-chairman Rempel opeuad the public hearing. Mr. Lee Fritz, 8033 Spinel, the applicant, stated that he will be auctioning some automobiles in conjunction with his business. He indicated that there will not be large numbers at any given time as the vehicles will be connected with estate sales and generally there would only be a few. He further stated that he will handle a lot of office equipment and his business is not a full auction operation, but rather, a service -peration. Mr. Fritz also indicated teat he would like to begin the auction at 7 p.m. Trere being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Mr. Barker questioned the allocation of 10 spaces to the proposed auction business. Mr. Gomez replied that the allocation of 10 spaces was during the hours of 8- 5. If he were storing automobiles for the auction, a ceiling of 10 aas established. Mr. Gomez stated that after the hours of 8-5, he would be able to use additional parking spaces. M^. Fritz stated tha` he would cooperate with his neighbors and he would furnish a saw horse to reserve spaces if they were needed, upon request. " Planning Commission Minutes -3- October 13, 1982 a• Commissioner Mc-Niel stated that he checked this out at 6 p.m. and there Were , only about 5 cars in the entire complex and there was nothing much going on. Nation: Moved by Barker, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 82-92, amending Condition No. 1 of the Planning Division to 7 p.m., Monday through Friday. E. ENVIROIDNTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10088 - NICOSIA - A residential subdivision of 82 acres into 131 single family lots in the R- 1-20,000 zone, generally located at the northeast corner of Archibald and Carrari Street - LPN 201-071-14, 37 and 45. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner, reviewed the staff report explaining a change of design in the cul-de-sac. He indicated that there had been no offer of dedication and the applicant must therefore provide a 45-foot dedication. Vice-chairman Hempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Lee Webb, applicant avid co-owner of the subject property, stated they were in general agreement with the staff report and conditions attached to the project. Commissioner Stout stated that he noticed a number of lot lines are not perpendicular to the street line and asked if grading is done, will problems occur with boundary lines between the properties. Mr. Webb replied that this will be the type of treatment that has occurred at Deer Creek which is multilevel and not cut and fill. Mr. Hopson asked if W. Stout's concern is that a property owner will not be able to get the correct property line because it is not perpendicular to the street. Mr. Stout replied that this is his concern. Mr. Doty, Planner for this project, replied that When this is laid out it will have curb and gutter and the property will be marked for homeowner's lots. Mr. Jack Pickering, Hidden Farms Road and Archibald, stated his concern for the entrance to this development. He stated that whereas most developments have two accesses, the only access to this development is south on Archibald. He indicated that he lives on the corner which is why he is so concerned. Mr. Paul iiougeau, Senior Civii Engineer, replied that there is another access through the back of the tract to Hermosa. He indicated th_t the location of the street is to the south end of the tract. He indicated that what is proposed is better from an engineering standpoint because it results in less traffic and congestion overall at Archibald. Planning Commission Minutes -4- October 13, 1982 p' i+lrs. Evelyn Pickering, 9680 Hidden Farm Road, stated that the access that is indicated for the north side of the tract would probably only be utilized by the people who border that part of the road. She indicated that hardly anyone goes into the mountains. She indicated further that most everyone works either at the southern or western areas and results in many people coming out at one point. She felt that the approach the City is taking towards access was foolish. Mrs. Shirely Hudlow, resident, asked about the catch basins in the northern part of the tract and if there is uncertainty that catch basins will be installed, where the water will drain_. Mr. Rougeau stated he would defer to Mr. Doty to answer that question. Mr. Doty replied that there will be a debris basin south of the tract and any water will go into the Alta Loma Channel. i Mr. Vairin stated that if the debris basin_ isn't needed or if a larger one is needed, it will require redesign and notification in order to comply with the Subdivision Map Act. Mr. Brad McCall, 9795 Carrari, stated he was delighted that something is happsring with this property and asked where the applicant proposes to put the model homes. Vice-chairman_ Rempel stated that at this point there is no design on model homes and that this is a custom lot tract. He indicated that he applicant can do two things; build houses and come back to Design Review or 'take and sell lots to individuals who will then build their own home:. Further, that if the applicant is going to build, they must come through the Planning Commission and Design Review. Mr. Yc Call asked when the project is going to start. Mr. Webb replied that they propose to begin_ the middle of next year and it would be done in four phases at the rate of twenty-five percent per year. Mr. Vairin stated that the reference made to model homes has a requirement for adequate parking so that it will not impact on the neighborhood. There being no further comments, the public hearing -w-as closed. Commissioner Baker commented on the concerns raised by the Pickerings and asked how much relief would be gained by using the proposed access. Mr. Vairin replied that it may not be feasible to have access on ^J° street. He further stated that the northeast corner access will connect and will be provided at the appropriate phase and that will be whenever they get to it. Mr. Vairin indicated that the developer will have to provide final maps on the phases and they will be examined at that time. Further, that this is at the top of Archibald and traffic is not expected to be significant. c'. Planning Commission Minutes -5- October 13, 1982 Commissioner Stout asked if the Commission can require permanent lot markers to be placed at the back of the lots. Vice-chairman Rempel stated that State law requires this within the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. Commissioner Harker stated that he is on the Design Review Committee and this project is the first one that he has seen come back after having gone through drastic changes. He commended Mr. Webb for their professionalism and skill in making this a very nice project. Motion: Moved by Stout, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 82-93, approving Tentative Tract No. 10088, with the addition f of five conditions contains in the addendum recommended by staff. Vice-chairman Rempel stated for the record that a letter has been received from Nis. Cadera relative to this item. tta6 * 7:55 p.m. The Planning Commission recessed 8:05 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened F. ENVIRONIW'NTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO 81-09 TENTATIVE { TRACTS 11804-11805 - ALLEN - A total planned development of 76 condominium units on 11 .03 acres of land in the R-3 and R-1 zones located at the northwest corner of Highland and Haven Avenues and 37. - APN 201-272-28, 30, 31 , Associate Planner, Dan Coleman, reviewed the staff report. I Senior Civil Engineer, Paul Rougeat , spoke of the improvements to Alta Loma Avenue. He indicated that an agm.ment must be made with the developer 'egarding the improvements. He i.dicated that after discussion it was felt that the best method of handling this is to asphalt the street and hydroseed the area until th< future street is needed. Yr. Rougeau stated this would be a good compromise because if they don't get improvements now, it is doubtful that they would be able to get them in the future. Mr. Rougeau stated, however, that this had not yet been discussed with the developer. W. Rougeau indicated that the result of this would be that this tem porary street would have asphal,. paving, rurbs and gutters, and with the grass, this could be used as a large lawn. Commissioner Mc Niel asked how large an area he is talking about. W. Rougeau replied that it would be the width of tau 4treet and go for about 100 feet. He indicated that this weld be maintained by the Homeowners Association. F Planing Commission Minutes -6- October 13, 1982 c: :ti< Vice-chairman Rempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Allen, the applicant, stated that he is in favor of the grass on the cul-de-sac because they don't know how long it will be before the freeway goes in. Mr. Alan Snapp, architect for this project, stated that he had worked with the staff and representatives of the Garden Apartments to come up with a plan that is compatible with the area in keeping with its rural character. He explained the architecture that will be used, indicating that this would contain both one and two story units. Commissioner Mc Niel asked if the one, two-stor-y unit referred to by Mr. Snapp would create any problems with the adjacent housing. 24r. Coleman replied that the unit is back from the property line but it does look into adjacent yards. He indicated that there is a requirement for dense landscaping to screen the view of the side elevations of the units. Commissioner McNiel asked if it is absolutely essential that this be two- story. Mr. Snapp replied that they have had problems with the density of the units fro= the beginning because of the geometry of the site and they have had to give up quite a few units, He indicated that he would have to discuss this with the developer and could not make a decision on this. Mr. Sid Silliman, 6120' riaver., brought some concerns of the Garden Apartments Homeowners's Association before the Commission. He indicated that they wished to have the row of eucalyptus :trees presently along the driveway to Haven preserved because of its scenic contribution, and would be opposed to removal of the trees. Mr. Sill*nn indicated that the change proposed for Alta Loma Road may increase traffic when it goes through and the Homeowner's Association was opposed to an increase. He suggested that it be built to a smaller width until the freeway goes through as a means of cutting down on traffic flow. He reminded that any changes brought before the homeowner's association require a three-fourths agreement relative to what happens to the strip of land owned by them. Mr. Rougeau stated that he did not know if the existing eucalyptus trees match up with Alta Loma Road. He indicated that if they do not, it would be difficult to save the trees. Further, that the location of Alta Loma Avenue has been set but it was possible for a slight adjustment depending on the freeway design. He indicated that any changes to its present location, would require a redesign of the project. Vice-chairman Rempel reminded .:he Commission that when the shopping center gas before Design Review they were required to put in their driveway where this is proposed. ?larning Commission Unutes -7- October 13, 1932 vc:i Mr. Rougeau explained 'how the width of the street requested by the homeowner's group would present problems, He indicated if this were to be built, it would have to be torn out and would then cost as much as a new street. Further, that dealing with the homeowner's association would be infeasible. '.r. Rougeau stated that bonds are not a good way to guarantee future street improvements because oftentimes the only way to recover the funds is through the courts. Mr. Vairin stated that in looking at the tract map it appears what the eucalyptus trees on the north could probably be saved thereby maintaining the character of the area. Mr. Vai^in also stated that it appears that the map coincides with the outside edge of the sidewall.. M. Rougeau stated that there would be 12 feet of parkway to work with so it is possible that the frees can be saved. Vice-chairman Rempel statea that Exhibit 8 shows the street above and the right-of-way, indicating that the trees could be saved. Mr. Hopson, Assistant City Attorney, added to what VL. Rougeau said. He stated that as a practical matter, it is difficult if not impossible to convince a bonding company to write a bond for a long term that has no finite limit in time. He further stated that the City would be better off to hold a cash deposit for the street improvements. He indicated that between the City office and theirs, they could figure out some kind of security that would protect the City if there is the desire to consider that kind of arrangement on the street. Mr. Hopson stated that on the west, assuming that it is dedicated property, the homeowner's association can be required to maintain the right-of-way and the City would want a specific condition to say that they would maintain the grassed area where it goes from Alta Loma Avenue to the cul-de-sac on the west boundary of the property. Commissioner Stout asked if it is anticipated that there will be parking on the interior of Alta Loma Street. Mr. Rougeau replied that it will be a public street but could be posted for no parking. He also stated that it would Yelp to have visitor parking. Commissioner Stout stated that they would be asking for trouble if the street is narrow. Mr. Rougeau stated that in the future it will be 44 feet because of the traffic it will carry after the freeway goes in. „;T . . Plann-ing Commission Minutes -b- October 13, 1982 Mr. Floyd Allen, 6402A Haven Avenue, who stated that he was not related to the applicant and was not speaking for the association, was in favor of the plan as presented. He further stated that with the indication that the applicant, Mr. Allen, has made regarding accommodations that have been discussed with the homeowners association, he saw no reason to make Alta Loma narrower. Mr. Steve Kellogg, resident of the Garden Apartmerts, stated that he was concerned about privacy and the ability of people to look into the back end of patios and back yards. Vice-chairman Rempel replied that the patios are at the east end of these units. He explained the requirement for landscaping along the property line. There being no further questions, the public hearing was closed. Vice-chain Rempel stated that this is another plan that has come a long way since initial application. He stated his appreciation for what Mr. Allen and Mr. Snapp have done in replying to concerns raised during the review process. Commissioner Mc Niel stated that he lives on a very narrow street and he wished it was wider because of the safety factor that erises when children play or go into the street. He cautioned the Commission about allowing a narrow street to be put in. T Commissioner Barker stated that !r^. Silliman's concerns appeared to be twofold : one, the preservation of the trees and the narrowing of the street to keep it an attractive through way. He stated further that cul-de-sacs generally deadend a street and with the greenery at the and it would be very attractive. He indicated that the only way for people to be able to use the street as proposed is for people to know about it ahead of time and this would only be known by people whc live in the area. He indicated that on that basis he did not feel it would Inc attractive for use. t Commissioner Barker agreed with Vice-chairman Rempel in that this project has grown substantially since it was first reviewed by the Design Review Committee. Vice-chairman Rempel stated that one thing that would help the street condition i5 the imposition of a condition for a sign on the front that this is not a through street. Commissioner Stout asked if the trees are blue gum eucalyptus. He further asked if they would be a fire problem. Mr. vairin replied that they are blue gums, and that they would have to meet the fire district's code, and they would also have to be trimmed. t Co=miaQioner Stout stated he was concerned with how close they are located to units because of their potential fire danger. He further stated that under certain conditions they are just like a torch. i Planning Commission Minutes -9- October 13, 1982 Vice-chairman Rempel suggested that something be worked out between the developer and the homasowner's association to replace the eucalyptus with a better tree. He felt that something could be worked out. Motion: Moved by Bari:er, seconded by McNiel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 82-94, with the added condition that an attempt be made to preserve the eucalyptus trees, that all required street improvements to the west of the property line, with the exception of actual paving, include sprinklers and. grass and that this be maintained by the homeowners association. Mr. Vairin stated that there is a seco-d resolution that deals with the land use designation and zoning on the property. For the benefit of the audience, Mr. Vairin stated that this matter will come before the City Council for zoning and property owners will again receive notice. Motion: Moved by Mchiel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 82-95, approving the Zone Change to R-3/PD for 11 .03 acres for planned development No. 81-09. G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 82-23 - CHURCII OF CHRIST - The temporary use of a 2,555 square foot industrial building for a church facility in the General Industrial category (Subarea3) , located at 9581 Business Center Drive, Suites A, B, and C - APN 209-021-04. Senior Planner, Michael Vairin, reviewed the staff report. Vice-chairman Hempel opened the public hearing. Mr. Don King, representing the church, stated their desire to serve the community. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Stout asked if this is a standard resolution. Mr. Vairin replied that it is and that fire code requirements have been included. Commissioner McNiel asked what is anticipated for a congregation in future years. Mr. Sing stated that they have purchased a piece of property on Heyman Street with the intention of proceeding with building in about 30 months. He indicated further that they hope to have a growth ratio of approximately 50 percent. Planning Commission Minutes -10- October 13, 1982 Notion: Moved by Barker, secondel by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 82-96, appmcving Conditional Use Permit No. 82-83. g � f ■ i DIRECTOR'S REPORTS H. CRAFFEY VOCATIONAL SCHOOL PARKING Rick Gomez, City Planner, reviewed a report provided to the Commission relative to the parking problems associated with the Chaffey College Vocational Skills Center located on Fercn Street. He indicated that the college has asked for a deferment on action until the end of the quarter at which time a plan can be worked out to solve the parking problem. Commissioner Stout stated that mandatory pay parking for the students for use of the parking lot has -been discussed and asked if this has been dropped. Mr. Gomez replied that it has not been dropped and is one of the options that they may employ. He indicated that the college may put ceilings on the amount of student population and if that does not work, the possibility exists that the approval should be revoked. Commissioner Stout stated that he thought the problem is that some of the students don't want to buy . parking permit. Mr. Gomez replied that this is correct. Commissioner Stout asked if they could be made to buy a parking permit. Mr. Gomez replied that this is one of the problems that they are working on. Vice-chairman Rempel stated that it is difficult to make a student buy a parking permit if they don't Sant to_ Commissioner Stout stated that if the student does not purchase the ticket, he cannot attend class. Mr. Donaldson, representing Chaffey College, stated that in California no student can be denied an education because he has not purchased a parking permit. Further, the college supports that law. He indicated that -f the student wants to park in a parking lot, the college can force the issue. Mr. Gomez stated that this gets back to the problem of on-str,.et parking. Mr. Rougeau stated that in observation, people tend to park on a distance basis. He indicated that they will park on the street if it is closer. Mr. Gomez stated that the City must be concerned by users who are burdened by that. Planning Commission Minutes -11- October 13, 1982 �S �; Vice-chairman Rempel stated that the intent in a developed area is to percent of street park the street when the strut is designed that you cant sayg-t 100 for parking_ You can t park in Henry Reiter, omen of buildings Vocational Skills Center surrounding the one used by the , indicated that the college put in a beautiful parking lot and then charged students for the use of it. He indicated that he and the sheriff's department have talked to Chaffey College on numerous occasions and they indicated that they would do nothing the college is providing students with an education b 'pla� indicated that the shoulders of the occupants of the businesses in the industrial indicated that theyst8 the area. on should take responsibility for the any' Commissioner � parking situation. Stow stated that he was not sure what will happen in two monthsand asked if the Cop3L'33ioa will have alternatives to consider. Vice-chairman Hempel stated that the option is for staff to solve the or to say revise the previous approval. problem back Gomez stated that it is his intention to solve the problem and to back to the Commission when he has accomplished something.this may be throw report charge or that through a rquirement in the din - indicated that theY must P�'oide on site park for review that they cannon ceiling on student population. fig. or through the use of Commissioner Barker azked if this p,-%oblem could be solved with more assurance if a deadline was established. Mr. Gomez replied that deadlines aimtys help. Vice-chairman Hempel stated that these should be solution before the school. year ends so that you will know wt L �'+�r must do. it was the consensus of the Commission at the Commission that this come back to the Planning November . meeting and that a decision be made regarding this issue at thatt t time, Mr- Hopsor stated that the owner, through leasing arrangements, has the to make some requirements. power S i f ! i Z. DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE Rick Gomez, City Planner, reported that the first generation draft of the Development code will be completed by the first part of November. He indicated. that he will advise when it is ready for the Zoning Committ revee's review. ,4 k�. VM Planning Commission Minutes _ -12 October i 3, 1982 Mr. Fritz, applicant for CUP No. 82-22, requested information on the requirements of Title 19. Mr. Vairin replied, explaining some of the requirements, and also advising that City staff would be available to help him. Nation: Moved by NeNiel, seconded by Stout, carried unanimously, to adjourn to the public hearing scheduled for the Etivanda Specific Plan, October 21 , 1982 at 7 p.m. in the Comn-inity Building. ADJOURNMENT the Pianr_ing Commission adjourned at 9:25 P.M. Respectfully submitted, JACK LAM, Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -13- October 13, 1982 CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 9 � , r O Iz DATE: November 10, 1982 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall , Engineering Technician SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR PARCEL MAP 6596 I i Parcel Map 6596, the div ;sion of 4.09 acres into 2 parcels of land within the M-2 zone, was tentatively approved by Planning Commission on June 24, 1981 for a period of 18 months. This site is located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Lucas Ranch Road. Donald and Sharon Erbstoesser, owners of the property, are requesting an exten- sion of the tentative approval to allow additional time to complete engineering details. ® I RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the attach- ed mutton granting a one year's extension of tentative approval for Parcel Map 6596. Resp ctfully submitted, LEH jaa Attachments ITEM A ♦u'r onl�lu�!�Illi � ppp'tl li ��lr Iil(L_ _ _ � �� � I 1 � I �1llilllrl rlll l;lllu__ tyl�•�1��111 rWY+'MY_LLLYLIYL s � � � W _— Uri ! 1 • Eli vvm — 1 � I I W f S I 1 i I 1 1 i l _ PROJECT q SITE �J W F !� CCCa110 . fitZ le' CITY OF RANCHO CCJCAN!IONCA O1 ENGINEERING DIVISION u z N - v� VICINITY MAP page r n PrSVntv6 Cv �,]� 3/::/e• TENTATIVE MAP piOgy Nfrrar ln[ 6n W,,,r °mono Yr's:Ce P,QRCEL MAP 6,596 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM fY.O LL - •.frr uviTlcYr C0.,rMrc I liunr:c utv, :rAY rVnrr'.r.�:rY '"n rrY1YT,S!ACR LEGAL LAND DESCRIPTION Aff• mL+cYzvarr, Irr I'm 011 A:Yl LtR n 1 "I., . r 1-N, PCC(Y11rL r1 I M :Ir i9 wAr. "'A= 45 .M 41, YRYX.M pr 1AL IV NANr�,!N,C^rr'.TY. I Yr M rnc.r+ 3 inlGuAwf Tii/ 177, «�n ql R• ¢Y/+s 5/f! n ru.,rrn.rm Nlr SP rls.-e ,rr�m ulc, ,.-,n. 'rncrrNn¢. Nnn, NArLN TI D AYwoorvm cAa fAY Ow0 N � / P LoCatYJn MCI.,_— = /Zl•CF' , roll Wruo,xL. , � ; dsYJ jj� titiQ � parcel 1rLo � 03L S � f •PCAA AA•R j 1 ! � � � '\• 1 T It ur wiv r.:. i I' j� I ... ! _ Parcel _ ,1 , 1�^iFL t Lit M✓f�+. I i r•t.�... 1 I f .i P•Js II .'� L6_"_'"�.�—.—�—__� � �� 1. — _ — _. — __ 9' I I �� r.c l•.a rrul:_ .Awz. a.rv.._ - -__ - —� AVE j::ZEquirmeat Co. Medicstl 3950 4th Sheetliv 0 RanctO Cucamonga,CA 91730 Phone(714) 987-6295 October 20, 1932 City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Department Engineering Division P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, C,1% 91730 ATfE14TION: Paul A. Rougeau Dear Mr. Rougeau: It will not be Possible to complete some of the engineering details for Parcel Map 6596 by the expiration date of -lecember 24, 1982. Donald T. Erbstoesser and Sharon S. Erbs f extension. toesser hereby request a time Enclosed is the extension fee in the amount of $62.00. Cordially, frlisloesser Sharor. S, Erbstcesser mh RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING Al EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 6726 WHEREAS, an application has been filed for a tine extension for the above-described project, pursuant to Section 1.501.8.2(b) of Ordinance 28-3, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a duly advertised public hearing for the above-described project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the above- described Tentative Parcel Map. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That strict enforcement of the conditions of approval regarding expirations would not be consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. B. That the granting of said time extensions will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamong, Planning Commission hereby grants time extension of the above-described pro.iect as follows: Parcel Map Expiration Date 6726 December 24, 1983 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey icing, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular sheeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November, 1982, by the following vote-tG-wit: Resolution No. Page 2 AYES: C0MISS:ONERS: NOES: CO MISSIONERS: ABSENT: C0MISSIONERS: F'v;� — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gv�+z�lc STAFF REPORT iD ii DATE: November 10, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission. FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michaei Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 82-03 - IliTERSTATE CGNSOLIDATED - A request to amend the General ?Tan Land Use Map fram Medium Residential (4-14 dwelling units per acre) to Commercial on approximately 8.9 acres of land, located on the northeast corner of Ramona and Foothill i Boulevard - APN 1077-621-31. I BACKGROUND: This request was first brought forward to the Planning ormission at their meeting of Septeaber 22, 1982. At that meeting, the Planning Commission requested the develo{ ;nent of an expanded Initial Study to analyze the specifics with some environmental factors such as transportation and hydrology and how those would be affected by various land use alternatives. Staff has sent detailed material to the applicant and the applicant's consultant for the preparation of the study. To date, the applicant has not graved forward in the development of this information. It is our understanding that the applicant has not had the time or resources to pursue this project at this time. Therefore, Staff recommends that this project and public hearing be continued to the meeting of January 26 1983. Res t ully ubmitted, R CK QME ity Planner G/MV/kep I ITEM B CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � STAFF REPORT I DATE: November 10, 1982 Ei is 1977 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer f BY: Barbara Krall , Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 3383 - BANKS The division of 5 acres of land into 4 IoFs witnin the R-1 zone located approximately 660' west of East Avenue - APN 227-131-29 (continued from Planning Commission meeting of September 8, 1982). Project and Site Description: The above-described parcel map is being re- submitted by Mr. James Banks, to divide five acres of land into 4 lots, the smallest being .71 acre. Approval was previously given by the City Engineer on May 12, 1980. This approval expired on November 12, 1981. This site is presently undeveloped. To the west is an existing residence; to the north and east is vacant land and to the south is an existing nursery. This surrounding land is zo,,ie R-1 with a General Plan designation of 2-4 dwelling units per a :re. The proposed Etiwanda Specific Plan shows the area as low-medium (4-8 dwellings per acre). The same proposed plan places the site outside of an equestrian area, but a community trail is proposed along the Souther-: Pacific Railroad. A 40-foot wide roadway from this site to a maintained dedicated street must be provided for ingress and egress purposes; twenty-six feet of this roadway will be paved. Since this site will drain to Base Line Road, drainage facilities at or near the extrance road on Base Line will be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Environmental Rv.view: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part 1 of the Tnitial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has com- pleted Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no significant adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. Correspondence: Notices of Public Nearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. ITEM C PLANNING COMISSION STAFF REPORT Environmental Assessment and Parcel Map 3383 November 10, 1982 Page 2 Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appr-3priate. Also a Negative Declaration should be issued. Respectfully submitted, -11-110 ✓fit//;�: :.�' f;:7";/4.,j%�� LBH:8 jas Attachments: Maps City Engineer's Report Initial Study Resolution ;r TENTATIVV SURVEYOR IRCEL 11�,4P v OWNER OANIEL D. FRANCIS ✓AMES BANKS ✓R. .4315 F1FTY-EIGHTH ST. IN THE CITY OF RANCID aiCA.MO/4CA 13181 VICTORIA SAN O/EGO, CA. 92//5 MAP.CH' (714) 981-0931 /9B0 ETMANDA, CA. 91739 Lt SOUTHERN PAC/F/C RR. TRACKS NORTH UN£OFLOT /O NB9'S6:30"E � _ 2028Bi 333 O—3 ' E 333_ 3' E FENCE !JC 7REF. A W 3 � III "I'S70RAGE �52;12' 25'£LC R.50 kj 1.7i AC. �— �D 2 L=32.IB '�— n N89°4B/5 E 303.1/ �n ptSHED AC OF DED.C.4T10 �� Q LLII v Nd9'4815 E 303.14 ) O� a 3 c,y ASIt- a g 2 $ � a � c ,yzt 0.92A�i � o ; N89048i5"£ J03.17' 30' 'EXI O 2 L=31.4/I,CO' I g RES/DSEWE T-2j�• 0-71AC. o how 1 UN/MPROVED 'ldbG°48/5 E 333.20 i 30UNL/NEGFLOT/O� OFFER OF) 7K'N GOVERAL /INFORMATION - sT UTILIT¢S: GAS WA7ER, TELEP.M7NE AAO EiEC:RJC/TY NOW SERYF ThE RECENTU'gNSTR L7Y MJATE A4'IDlATELY TO W6T AND CAN BE EXTc'NDED TO SERVE THIS PRC)A'RTY ,qS NE�.S' S,aRY. ���yyypppD/���5?OSAL TU �BY CESSPOOL AIID S£PT7C TANX. Q SELE7?AL LARD£ EU r TREES �R£ ON PROPOSED PARCEL 4 QND R01Y5 OF p MEDiLM 70 LARGE EUC^S Alm ALOA{v TAE NQ?TN AAp7 SlXJTH B04DEkS OF THE +Ff'i2''i-RTY ORAeVAGE SLL%E lS AFPROX. 2gp ALMOST DUE SbG'TH/N DIR�.�TIGW W/TN THE RA!LRO4D ON THE NORTH 570PPYNG WA I7 FLOWING' SOUTH FFt�FI EN77t�R1NG THE PROPER7:! � cMaMOSE0 LAND USE: EVENTUAL (.'OA6TRUCTR�'V OF 57NtiLE FAMILY I+ESIOENCi�S. BU(c0/IAi SET- C BAD 7O BE A AUNdl1/M CF Z5'Fi�7l1 ThE PROPOSED EA5T STREET De�7b^A7ION ,� .SITE VICINITY MAP NO SCALE ,-•' �v4?ORIC .�_ .i__— STREf i ` •e �� IGjI i ..�r.iwnl A,..� J rv. II O 1 I ie i 7 • .! I �K Mo4wT _.,a_I P.LL SJO Wm cv Q r • "' _, ie tr .n,e.n .< _tamer ,r L.i ,y �• q.c ti�p y �, • na I ( 1 I IIC� .O.er• • Y I.��� I 4r� EG LrM1C y title; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAxiQNGA c.T A PARCEL MAP 3 F � Z ENGINEERING DIVISION T "�-----.++' VICINITY MAP amr page CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT FILED BY: James Banks ,Jr. TENTATIVE MAP NO. PM 3383 LOCATION: North of Base Line, between East and DATE FILED: resubmitted 8/82 Etiwanda Avenues NUMBER OF LOTS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION• Portion of Lot 10, Bik "K" of RECEIPT NUMBER- Etiwanda Colony Lands FEE:- 5230.00 ZONE: TENTATIVE MAP PREPARED BY: Johnson & Moz1ey GROSS ACREAGE:_4 acres ADDRESS: 1033 E. Rosemead Ct. MINIMUM LOT AR EA: Ontario, CA 91764 MINIMLtt1 LOT FRONTAGE: ® RECORD OWNER(S) ADDRESS PHONE 0 James Banks, Jr. 13181 Victoria, Rancho Cucamonga 91739 981-0931 REPORT OF THE CITY ENGINEER Dedications I. Dedication by final wzp of all interior street sights-of-way and ail necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. X 2. Dedication by final map of the following missing rights-of-way on the following streets: ins additional feet on Pecan Avenie In, additional feet on Oak Street 40' X10ftioNal feet on re uired , oadwav from site to neares main ained _ R�k h7�KXRX�XiE1fg�Y1:XdEi4��$3E Qum 11 c street Other 3. Rights of vehicular access shall be limited as follows: 4. Street vacation required for: 5. Master Plan of Streets revision required for: _ 6. The following perimeter intersections require realignment as follows: RCE 20 TENTATIVE MAP N0. 3383 Page 2 Improvements (Bonding is required Drior to M Recording for Pecan Ave and* *26' pavement to public streILlitBui I ding permit for a . ree 1 7. Construct full street improvements (including curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, one drive approach per lot, parkway trees and street lights) on all X interior streets. 8. Construct the following missing improvements on the following streets: *includin landscapin and irrigation on meter CURB & R.C. SIDE- DRIVE STREET STREET MEDIAN STREET NAME JTER PVAtT. WALK APPR. TREES LIGHTS ISLAND* OTHER X 1 X X t time x x x x x i ion 26'wid 4 X 9. Construct all storm drain and drainage structures as shown on the tentative map, or as required by the City Engineer. X 10. Provide all utility services to each lot including sanitary sewers, water, electric power, gas, telephone and cable television.coiduit. All utilities are to be underground. x 11. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 12. Install appropriate street name signs and traffic control signs with loca- tions and types approved by the City Engineer. X 13. Developer is to provide all construction plans for drainage and street im- provements. Such plans shall meet approval of the City Engineer. _X 14. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. `X 15. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the amity of Rancho Cucamonga shall be decorative poles with underqround service. 16. The following existing streets being torn up by new services will require an A.C. overlay: 17. The o owing spi sions, radius, street widths) are not approved: section 18. The o owing a IZ.Ling streets are su stan ar They will require: Approvals and Fees _ 19. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CALTRANSJ San Bernardino County Flood Control District. _ cL 20- Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agen- cies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. b: RC£ 20 TENTATIVE MAP NO. 3383 Page 3 ® X_ 21 . Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: A. Caltrans, for: B. City: X C. County Dust Abatement District: D. D.I.S. Trenching Permit if any trenches are over 5' deep: y E. Cucamonga County Water District: F. Other: Nap Control 22. If only a portion of this Map is recorded , adjustments shall be made to pro- vide for two-way traffic and parking on a affected streets. 23. The following lots appear to be substandard in either frontage, depth or area and should be corrected on the final map: 24. All corner lots shall have a corner radius at the right-of-way ine in accord- ance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga standa -ds. 25. A Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the fir_t phase subdivision to prevent the creation of an unrecognized parcel located 26. The boundary of the Tentative Map needs c arificaticn .as fo ows: 27. The border shall be shown to centerline of =rist:ag perimeter streets, or title explanation required. ® Parcel Map Waiver 28. Information submitted at the time of application is is not sufficient to support the issuance of a waiver of Parcel Map Certificate, according to requirements of the State Map Act and local ordinances. lF yisax"MM X (Bonding is required prior to ®(Recording fb)t ) DRAINAGE (bKS14RJiI�i16 ( _) 29. Proposed subdivision falls within those areas indicated as subject to flood- ing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This subdivision will be subject to the provisions of that program and Ordinance No. 24. 30. A drainage c"ianne' and/or flood protection wall along the entire north pro- perty line may be required to divert sheet runoff to streets. Such flow may be required to go under sidewalks through culverts. 31. If water surface is above top of curb, 30" walls shail be required at the back of the sidewalk at all downstream curb returns. _ 32. Culverts required to be constructed across streets at following locations: _ 33. Broad scale hydrologic studies will be reauzre to assess rmpac o increased runoff. ® X 34. Dedicate drainage easement and install proper- drainage facilities to drain site to Base Line Road and eliminate existing flooding situation on Base Line Road. RCE 20 �i, TENTATIVE MAP NO. 3383 Page 4 Miscellaneous X 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. _ 36. Noise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. 37 . This property is not within the present City Boundary and will require annexation. 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- quired- X 39. Proper grading and erosion control , including the preventation of sedimenta- tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Enginceving Division. X 41 . The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the tire building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. X 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1 ) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right-of-way or easement and the sign ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the fin map unless the City is notified ir, writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time 1Smits of said Section. X 43. At the time of Final Map submittal , the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets) , copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use common drive approaches at lot lines. X 45. Local and master planned equestrian trails shall be provided in accordance with the Equestrian Trait Plan. A detailed eques':rie,, trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fenc4:ng and weed control in accordance with the City Equestrian Trail Standards, shali be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER By: '` RCE 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCWNGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is Made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1 ) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environnental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: South Hipvard Ranch APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE. James Barks, Jr. 13181 Victoria, Etiwanda, Ca. 91739 (714) 899-1279 BUT 140TE: mailing add: P. O. Box 278 Upland , Ca. 91786 NAME, ADDRESS, TELIZPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: James Banks Jr Post Office Box 278 , Upland , California 91786 (714) 981-0931 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 660' 1320' N. of Baseline. 660 '-990' W. of East Ave. , Assessor's Map Bc.ok 227 Page 13 area 131 parcel 29 in Tax Code Area 7011 LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: No. Such other permits as may be required have been obtained and one on file with City. I-1 �r PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Lot s �•plit of one £i into three one-acre lots and one two-acre-ante parcel ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Five cross acres will ultimately contain four large houses b zt there awe no current bai vines plans. DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE IMClUDING INFOPkATIOH ON TOPOGRAPH'{, PLANTS (TREES), P.NIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Pacific Electric Railwar tracks on north side. Row 7 P eucalvptis on the east side with more bare land pTl he other side of the euc I y zp :1 s Whole ale -n— 'si; on the scuth side The �zeviously lot-sp12t into what is nearly a mirror ,,nacP of this Dro,ect and one house has been ^onsroacte� on the south-most lot. Exce t for the euca_ lvPtis trees on the east and south boundaries there is no veaetaticn other than weeds. The land slopes sli fitly from north to south and st rraddles a ve sli fit rid e which runs in a north-south direction. There are some make-shift or temporary sheds on the property but they are being removed the property has a view of the grove north of it and land or. either side of that trove. Is this project, part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small , may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No_ The project is only a lot split with a view toward the possible future construction o£ four houses. �,;`: 1-2 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in g-ound contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. )? Increase by four houses. _— X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? Ncr_e, :mess required by the City for road purposes X. 6. Create the need for use or disposal of _ potentially hazardous materials suz;i as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: There are no "yes" answers above. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented <°re true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further und_rstand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. 2 Date 5 July 1982 Signatur Ql/ti•/�L/(fir." � Title Owner .`> I-3 RESIDDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to tce City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Divisioli in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: James Banks, Jr. i Specific Location of Project; N. of Baseline, W. of East Avenue i Thera are no current building plans. PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single family units: One One One One four 2. Number of multiple family units: None None None None None 3. Date proposed to begin const uctio. 1984 1985 1986 1987 N/A 4. Earliest date of occupancy: 1985 1986 1987 1988 N/A Model ; and n of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Rarae 3_5 140 , �30 150,000 160,000 170,000 ti I_4 i RESOLUTION N0, x A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CONVAISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 3333 (T.ENTATIVE PARCEL `WP 140. 3383) , LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD, WEST OF EAST AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Flap Number 3333, submitted by James Banks, Jr. and consisting of 4 parcels, located at the south side of Southern Pacific Railroad, west of East Avenue, being a division of a portion of Lot 10, Block "K" of the preliminary map of the Etiwanda Colony Lands per map recorded in Book 2, page 24 of Maps of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 1982, a formal application Has submitted requesting review of the above-described Tentative ;Nap; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing ,"or the above-described map. FOLLOWS: iiOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMON6k PLANNING COKNIISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the proposed General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the proposed Genera Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting prc,:erty. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Nenative Declaration is issued- on November 10, 1982. SECTION 3: That tentative Parcel Flap No. 3333 is approved subject to the conditions of the City Engineer's Report pertaining thereto. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS iOTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1982. PLANNING C% SISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Resolution No. Page 2 BY• Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commmission i, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adapted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning CGInission held on the loth day of November, 1982, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: CO;VIISSIOIERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: p�. — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA c ao STAFF REPORT '�'.� Uii ;> 1977 DATE: November 10, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 82-16 - SUBAREA 16 MASTER PLAN - SAFEWAY - Conceptual review of the proposed Master Plan for Subarea 16 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan which is located between Fourth and Sixth Streets and between Hellman and Archibald Avenues. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant, Safeway Enterprises, Inc., has prepared a Master Plan for the development of Subarea 16. which encompasses approximately 145 acres of land under nwitiple ownership. Subarea 16 is zoned for industrial park uses and is generally located at the northwest corner of Fourth Street and Archibald Avenue (Exhibit "I"). Under the General Plan and the industrial Area Specific Plan, the first developer withii: Subarea 15 or all property owners within the Subarr.a are responsible for the preparation of a Master Plan to address circuldtion, drainage and land use issues. The applicant has worked closely with staff and affected property owners to prepare a written text and exhibits which provide extensive description and analysis of the above-listed issues and which proposes master circulation, drainage, and implementation plans. In addition, an expanded Initial Study was prepared to analyze all aspects of the master plan. . This information is compiled within a booklet which is includeu in this packet for your review and consideration. Approval of the proposed Master Plan would establish a conceptual plan for j circulation and drainage that will provide a guide for coordinating future I development consistent with General Plan and Industrial Area Specific Plan goals. Specific site plan reviews for each phase of development of Subarea 16 will be required. Specific conditions of approval will be imposed upon each phase in order to ensure consistency with the adopted Master Plan, General Plan, and Industrial Area Specific Plan. Upon 1. approval of the master plan, the applicant intends to submit specific site plans for the development of their property, identified as Phase I, as shown on exhibit "2". i __j ITEM D k" Development Review 82-16/Subarea 16 Master Plan Planning Commission Agenda November 10, 1982 Page 2 SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is primarily vacant land with limited vineyard proauction and selected mature trees associated with eight private residences, as shown on Exhibit "2". The area is generally flat terrain that slopes to the south at less than a 2 percent grade. The project site is bounded on the north by an existing low density (2-4 du/acre) residential neighborhood. or. the east by industrial land uses, to the south by existing medium residential uses, and on the west by an existing trailer park and industrial uses. ANALYSIS: The Master Plan was required because Subarea 16 is a large, vir�Y, undeveloped area, under multiple ownership, and located at a sensitive location adjacent to residential development and at a major gateway to the community. In order to facilitate future development in a coordinated manner, the Master Plan contains three basic elements: 1. A Circulation Plan, 2. a Drainage Plan, and 3. Implementation Plan. The rirculation Plan, as shown in Exhibit "3"., consists of a single, local industrial street, that will function as the backbone of internal circulation in Subarea 16. This street is located along property lines to allow maximum access to all parcels and minimize the pavement area. This design was chosen because it affords the greatest flexibility to each property owner in how their land develops. It also permits construction of a half street until such time as a full street is needed. Further, the cost of improvements would b., split equitably among property owners. The proposed street limits access primarily to Hellman Avenue and Fourth Street. This will reduce traffic volumes on Sixth Street and Archibald Avenue and minimize the impact of future industrial park development upon the residential neighborhood. The Drainage Plan, as shown in Exhibit "4", takes full advantage of the Cucamonga Creek channel located along the western bounaary of Subarea 16 by draining the majority of the Subarea through new storm drains into the channel . For the remaining portion of the Subarea water will be carried by a proposed storm drain into Deer Creek channel . The Master Plan proposes that the development of Safeway Property would involve drainage of a portion of the property into Archibald Avenue and a portion into a temporary concrete swale. The 'temporary Swale will coincide with the proposed industrial collector street. The Implementation Plan outlines "each property owners's responsibility (by parcel, see Exhibit "S") by implementing the Master Plan [improvements], should any one of the property owners choose to develop in the initial stages [of Subarea 161 ". The City and property owners may desire to form an assessment district to finance the construction of master plan improvements, primarily storm drains. 5,' Development Review 82-16/Subarea 16 Master Plan Planning Commission Agenda November 10, 1982 Page 3 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEES: The proposed Master Plan has been reviewed 13 the Design and Development Review Committees, and received positive recommendations. In addition, meetings were held with the property owners to obtain their input during the formulation of the master plan. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The expanded Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the applicant, is attached in the Master Plan booklet for your review. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study and found that the Master Plan would not have significant adverse impacts on the environment. Therefore, issuance of a Negative Declaration is recommended. FACTS FOR FINDING: The Master Plan has been prepared in accordance with City standards and the goals and policies of the Industrial Area Specific Plan and EIR. The project site is suitable for industrial park development and the proposed circulation and drainage plans are consistent with the General Plan, and Zoning Ordinance requirements. CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was published in the Daily Report newspaper. In addition, approximately 132 notices were mailed to property owners within 800 feet of the project site as requireu by the Industrial Area Specific Plan for Subarea 16. The applicant has met witn property owners withn Subarea 36 to obtain their input prior to completing the master plan. Copies of the masker plan were mailed to all of the property owners within the Subarea. To date, staff has received several telephone calls from residents ncrth of Subarea 16 expressing concern ;vita the compatibility of the Industrial Park land use designation. No objections to the Master Plan itself have been received either from property owners within Subarea 16 or surrounding residents. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to consider public input and elements of this project. If after such consideration, the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, then the adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. Res ectfully submitted, ick ( umez ity Planner R6:DC:jr Development Review 82-16/Subarea to Master Plan Planning Commission Aoenda November 10, 1982 y Page 4 Attachments: Master Plan for Subarea 15 Exhibit "Y' - Location Map Exhibit "2° - Existing Land Use Exhibit 93" - Circulation Plan Exhibit "4" - Drainage Plan Exhibit "5" - implementation Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions is; 21 ® RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 82-16 FOR THE CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN FOR SUBAREA 16 OF THE INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED BETWEEN 4TH AND 6TH STREETS AND BETWEEN HELLNdiN AND ARCHIBALD AVENUES IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK ZONE WHEREAS, on the 3rd day of September, 1982, a complete application was filed by Safeway Enterprises Isc. for review of the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the loth day of Ne;ember, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above-described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following can be met: I. That the proposed Master Plan is in accord with the objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and ® 2. That the proposed Master Plan, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed Master Plan is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance; and 4. That the proposed Master Plan is consistent with the General Plan. 5. That an Environmental Impact Report for the Industrial Specific Plan has been prepared and certified in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 6. That the EIR contains mitigation measures which have been included in the Master Plan for Subarea 16, that adequately address potential impacts upon the environment. SECTION 2: That this project will net create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on November 10, 1982. Page 2 SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 82-15 is approved subject to the following conditions : I . That this approval is conceptual approval only and does not constitute approval of any specific designs. 2. 7hat specific site plan review is required for each development within Subarea 16. 3. That the improvement required by the Master Plan will be imposed upon each development where applicable and when necessary. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive requirements for public improvements beyond those required by the implementation matrix of the Master Plan, when said improvements are required by City Ordinance or Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST• Secretary of the Planning Couenission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning COmm15SiGn held on the loth day of November, 1982, by the following vote-to•-wit: AYES: COh1MISSIONERS: fiOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COf4MISSIONERS: u ,x CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA G�ycwM� STAFF REPORT DATE: November 10, 1982 U I!> TO: Members of the Planning Commission t „ EROMI: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJ_CT: ENVIRGIZ4ENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82-18 - HOUARD - The development of a church facility including ing two buildings which total 4,200 square feet on 5.5 acres of land in the R-1-20,500 zone located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Wilson Avenue - APN 201-831-01. SUMMARY: This item should be continued to the November 24, 1962 agenda so the Applicant can work with staff to resolve a conflict with the adjoining property, east of the project site. An approved tentative tract map, located between the project site and the Alta Loma Channel, ® indicates a future street along the common property line. The design of the site and location of buildings needs to be re-examined because of the proposed street. A complete description and analysis of the project will be provided with the Staff Report for the November 24, 1982 i meeting. 1 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that this item be continued to November 24, 1982 Planning Commission meeting. spectf lly submitted, s RICI GOP. City Planner RG:CJ:jr '':". ITEM E CITY OF RANCHO uuCAMONGA rUCA STAFF REPORT >4 y 1977 DATE: November 10, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 82-03 - BIDCAL - A change of zone from R-1 (Single Family Residentia to R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) for 2.02 acres of land located on the west side of Archibald Avenue, north of Monte Vista Street - APN 201-131-61 & 62. Related File: Tentative Tract 12256 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: This request for the change of zone is in conjunction with a twenty-five unit condominium project on 2.10 acres of land located at the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista Street (Exhibit "A"). The development proposal , Tentative Tract 12256, is also on the agenda this evening for your review and consideration and is attached cis Exhibits "B" and 'C". A description of tla project is provided with the Tract Map Staff Report. The development proposal is located on the three parcels shown on Exhibit "D". However, this zone change request covers only the two large lots. The small lot to the so;.th is already zoned R-3. Land surrounding the subject parcels is zoned R-3. The General Plan shows that the project site is located along the dividing lines between two land use designations: Low Medium density (4-8 du's/ac) to the north and Medium Density (4-14 du's/ac) to the south. Bordering the pr�>ject site to the north and west is a mobile home park. A mix of older single family and multi-family units exist on small residential lots south of the project. On the east side of Archibald, across from the site, is an approved multi-family project. ANALYSIS: The project site is adequate in size and shape to accom- modate the types of uses that would be permitted within the R-3 zone. The zone change in conjunction with the development plans should pro- vide an adequate transition between the mobile home park to the rorth and west and the R-3 lots to the south. The change of zone and density of 11 .90 units per acre proposed development are also consistent with the General Plan land use designations Of Middium Density Residential (4-14 du's/acre). ITEM F Zone Change 82-03/Bidcal Planning Commission Agenda November 10, 1932 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part I of the Initial :>tudy, as completed by the App scant, is provided for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and has found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this zone change. If the Coszvrission concurs with such findings, issuance of a Negative Declara- tion would be in order. FACTS FOR FINDING: The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed lot size. The change of zone is consistent with the General Plan and corresponding Tract Map and has a density within the range allowed. The approval of this zone change will not create adverse impacts on surrounding properties. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Daily Report newspaper, and thirty-three property owners within 300 feet of the subject property have been notified. To date, no cor- respondence related to the zone change has bean received. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and element= relative to this project. If after such considera- tion the Commission can support the findings, adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Res ectf lly 4bmitted, tI CK OMEZ Zty lanner :CJ:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Tentative. Tract Map 12256 Exhibit "C" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "D" - Assessor's Map Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval T ��.. v� .�.e a ....•■ �.�. .N.••. •:11. .N :::1:• .•.� p�...� • 1• • RESIDE 7 i iAL r .ice(({IfiFFLL..\/ : .......... VERY LOW<2Du's/AC e LOW 2-4 DU's/AC :.......... •o::. C LOW-MEDIUM a-sDu'sie►c • • = € MEDIUM 4-14 DU's/AC ' :::• s MEDIUM—HIGH 14-24 Du's/AC o� .<: . • :: = HIGH 24-30 DU's/AC ••� ® MASTER PLAN REQUIRED '. AA i!1 et A—I R+yAPO — —3--f ill 0 J - P - CITY OF ITE.l: PLAINNING DIVISION EXHIBIT- "A * SCALE: VA.T S �i "' EhTATIVE MAF� TRACT NO. 12256 iExisr zone - as ti- I F �, VO E%tST. ZONE •Rye j r";,,;I�I :• f 4 �Y,s�••'' 1 ; �: MQ TE VISTA;- STREET �- ".`ORTH I CITY OF trEm: RANCHO CUCAkLjoNGA Tr,LE:3e rr TAT rzz5� � PLAl\iMI\G QI`71S1QN EXHIt3IT:_ t �+" ni `• i E� I I �I I aD ed It \ jy� I "n 21 2 •....�...� .:sn .sc .w r—wao.s ..q 11 SrS �•� .try .•w[ .v y�wrt wuwKw(:fw•: �� II w. n� �� � •�Kaw wyrQw I I I wr.wrrw r..rn r• li i1711 •`•wVN nw• �a ♦ w � 1�Arc MONTE VISTA STSEET M1 s IL NORTH �tNr.t;TEh �EMC6 W6 tlCtp$ylll PATIO PLNCE CITY OF iTE1�I: sz� RANCHO CUCAXIO\GA TmE: PL1'\fiI.\G DIr%rLS N EXHIBIT. rt-" S(-.ALE:-hL _ 1 4 Racsha Cvcamo,-Va City -f�3 x Tax Rcfe Area 15004 •\ ar T Ke 1G 1 e c`1___•_ � j -r 37 � 3941 434ri I47 rs a MrnSTE v ��-rR STREET Mr 1 34 _ Q 1 3b 33 140 42 44 46 49 I W 11 i I • Q 2 r e�'sr rr� MA Y {($ 1 1 f� �1. 5_- CITY OF TIME: t N� �"� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONuA 1� ST'uD. INITIA' 1 PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assess-gent Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this forn must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the Project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prep re a Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional iP.for ation report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITI E: ^:ont, Vista rtates APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: 31DCAL Cozzi . 999T Sari Ur., "ta L—.a r •_-.you aLu NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO 8£ CONTACTED COKERNIN& THIS PROJECT: Eer-Meth J. 1.1ore or James A-mares 999; Santis Dr. Alta I.or..a, c:a. • (u) , e-SOU Zit or yo�,G, . LOCATION -OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL, NO. ) i+o w-west Corner o£ _Soate V_sna and Ar-CIIibald LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM: LOCAL, REGIO qL, STATE 3� FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: 3:oae to onr :coa3edge I-1 ,yr 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION lop DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Arent; `i: attached 'noses or -n averaTe _1.nu i G '°1_ an taree aFaroon:ic =s, cos 2tc 1avir. �,tn - .�u,.- 1n.1S�77 D2P.e:1t5 O: GCi^^:OII area aner�ties a:,c -reencelts. ------------------- ACR=AGE OF PROJECT AREA 'AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY 2.i6 acres, dstizz old : awe s kPProx. 250l s0 fit. and Y2o0ose•.1 cc, I y sc !', 0. nee DESCRIBE THE EAlYIRONMENTAL SETTiN� OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLJDING I"IFOPMjATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY S?-iEETS): Gentle soutrerly slcoina- ?_ acre site some old e:dst-n7 alarts and tre s to see o, 6) ...._ L+nd�caoinE nL rug urn 1- to.- cal._or scene t Pc+c ( d one o_ c. n� oa*ers of sic leer n_coert., . - s u _, i-din- 'Droner ty aa: T=^t tentative marls o' tae sam> nature. Old naraee. small ate" route and rncttld s to oe re::ored and tenants are owners and n olm some o_' tr+e nrorosed none . w_ Is this project, part of a larger Project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, ray as a whole have significant environmental impact? Not to our lano:•aed:-e. 2-2 � 1 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO � = 7. Create a substantial change in ground contours? , a 2. Create a substantial change in existing i� noise or vibration? .;� 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc. )? 4. Create ^-hanges in the existing zoning or general plan, designations? _ 5. Remove any existing trees? How man,? rr9: 6. Create the need for use or disposal of _ }potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: 7he e:cistin-- trees • � - i rco--Dorated into the _andscaoin- ni an vo:-,- we7 2. a -rove s=te. tm 'yere acle tQ -inco=oI2Le a tteI-;r hinn ..E.ynP^�;ae trees i.-±to the nizn. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the Form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above zrd in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand the - additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date Zi.?� .� °=� ✓ Signature ^i��i ' Title I-3 : `_ I1 _n f�j}D`N�Ii�L VV�lsj(�V�..: jVlq The following inforra;tion should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accOMmodate the prcposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Traces Specific Location of Project: ?;orthwest corr_er Of rchibai@ and • ` io�te PP.ASE I PN.RSE 2 a E HASc 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1- lurmer of single family units: 2; act nizas n- to de 6 ete-r -^ned c tv^e dates 2. Number of multiple family units: :done 3. Date proposed to begin construction: Se�t.79�2 r 4. Earliest date cf Occupancy: ?- 3 f^odel and s of Tentative 5_ Sedrooas Pric�Qe Play d- 2bd.^s ='79,OGu.00 ZIan b- 3-d—e ti� �,000.00 'r F-4 ® RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION j RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 82-03 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM R-1 TO R-3 FOR 2.02 ACRES OF LAND LJCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE, NORTH OF MONlt VISTA STREET WHEREAS, on the 30th day of July, 1982, an application was filed and accepted on the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of November, 1982, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section. 65854 of the California Government Code. SECTION I: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following ir�gs: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. That the proposed zone change would not have significant impact an the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3- That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the existing and proposed General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project w—iii not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration on November 10, 1982. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the California Government Code, tf:at the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 10th day of November, 1982, Zone Change No. 82-C3. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 82- 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council . APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS LOTH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1982. t. ^I WE, Resolution No. Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF R;,NCHO CLICAMONGA BY: �Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co=ission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November, 1982. by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: CITY OF RAI'MR0 CUCAIVIOziiA CUCAA4% STAFF REPORT III � I�z Vii Jla 1977 { DATE: Novesber its, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assi;--tant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 122566 SIDCAL - e eve opment ,i1 3 'co{i ominium units on 2. O acres o and in the R-i zone (R-3 pending) located at the rorthviest corner of Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista Street - APN 202-131-27, 61 and 62. Related File: Zone Charge 83-03 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTiON: This project consists of 25 condominium units on 2.10 acres of land located at the northwest forner of ArchibalG Y. ® Avenue and Monte Vista Street. A change of zone (ZC 82-03) from R-1 to R-3 is pending and is also being considered or% this agenda. Currently two houses and several other structures are located on the site. A drainage ditch cuts diagona:iy across the site from the north- west to the southeast. Numerous trees and shrubs exist on the property as shown on Exhibit "B '. Contours on the site indicate a slope of approximately 3 percent running northwest to southeast. A block wall surrounds the property an the north, south, and west property lines. Zoning on the subject property currently is R-I and R-3 as shown on Exhibit "A". Land surrounding the project site is zoned R-3. The General Plan indicates :naz Lhe project site is located along the dividing line between two lard use designations; Low Medium density (4-8 du' s/ac) to the north, and Medium density (4-14 du's/acre) to the south. Bordering the project site to the north and west is a mobile home park_ A mix of older single family and multi-family units exist on the small residential lots south of the project. On the east side of Archibald, across from the site, is an approved multi -family project. M. v 1 ITEM G Tentative Tract 12256/Bidcai Planning Commission Agenda November 10, 1992 Page 2 As shown on Exhibits "C" thrnugh "F", 'the project consists of eight buildings with a total of 25 dwelling units. The proposed density is 11.90 units per acre. Each unit is a trio-story townhouse with an attached two car garage (Exhibit "G"). Tnree floor plans are provided ranging in size from 1 ,015 to 1 ,207 square feet (Exhibit "H"). Vehicular circulation into the project is provided by a single driveway closely aligned with the Victoria Street right-of-way. Emergency secondary access will be provided from Ronte Vista Street. . In addition, the Applicant is responsible for a bicycle lane on the west side of Archibald. ANALYSIS: Tt:E project has been reviewed by the Deign Review, Growth Management, and Grading Committees. together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is consistent with current resi- dential standards of tree City. Nearly half of The site is devoted to public or private open space, including a large play area in the center of the project and private patios for each unit enclosed by a 4-foot high wall . Existing vege- tation including mature trees and shrubs along the west property line will be preserved to the extent possible. A recommended Condition of Approval requires the submittal of a detailed plan outlining exactly what trees and/or shrubs are to be saved. With development of the project, th; Applicant will be rewired Lo construct storm drains from the northerly boundary of the project to the railroad tracks approximately 1000 feet south of the project site. The cost of construction for the storm drain will be in lieu of drain- age fee_ A reimbursement agreement will be prepared for the dollar amount of construction Which exceeds the storm drain fee. On-site improvements include a 21-lost drainage easement with an underground storm drain to replace the drainage ditch which exists on the property. DESIGN REVIE6: The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project with conditions that the rear elevations ff units facing Archibald Avenue be upgraded with additional trim. Colored renderings of the elevations will be av;.ilable for ycur review at the Planning Commission meeting. Another =ondition recommended by the Design Review Committee, as indicated on the Resolution of Approval , requires that the concrete emergency access lane alr.ng the west property line be replaced by compacted granite with a turf overlay. e Tentative Tract 12256/Bidcal Planning Commission Agendr November 10, 1982 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Part I of the initial Study, as completed by the Applicant, is provided for your review and consideration_ Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. If the Cc :rnission concurs with such findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration, would be in order FACTS FOR FINDING: This project, together with Conditions of Approval , is in accordance with the General Plan, Zoning OrdinanCe, Growth Manage- ment Ordinance and Subdivisio Ordinance of the L. :.y. In addition, the use together with the recommended Conditions of Approval will not be detrimentai to the oublic health, safety, or general welfare of the public or private properties in the immediate vicinity. CORRESPONDENCE: A notice of public hearing was published in The Daily Report newspaper and public hearing notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a pub is hearing to consider all input ar.i elaiients of this project. If after such consideration the Commission concurs with the findings and Conditions of Approval , adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration wcild be appropriate_ Res egtfully ubmitted, RICK OME ty . lanner G:CJ:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Natural Features Map Exhibit "C" - Tract Map 12256 Exhibit "D" - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit "E" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "F" - Grading Plan Exhibit "G" - Elevations (2 Sheets) Exhibit "H" - Floor Plans Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions ;f . W . F R- t a N F 7�� G Q / F_ �~- --� . M13A1pivcTTc ST t, R 1 LLL R-�3 / PD R-I ft- 3 Low - Medium Density(4-8Du/Ac - -�- t Mobil Home Park Pf4JSD A \�1.44T H t!) G z W _�a T c> } !j 17 , 3- , � ! a 1 j a 1y1 dburra en$OlyY —J41 u'lAc rdONTE VISTA STRE°_T R3 4 R-3 � Medi I um Deusit�,, (-;-14 Du /Ac) \'ORTH CITY OF NCHO CUCATMONGA. PLANNING Di%rMN EXHt��+�rra�res SCALE-ITS_ it � T � T Ka , $F 1 y � � C E � � x y t � g WORTH CITY OF ITEM: -rr ,use RANCHO CL.CA�IJ�T GA TiTI,E: ►�hru t. r r4A p _-- PL1%2\'NI� DIVMON EXHIBIT ��� SCALE- 1 5. " E.fdTQTIVE MAP --TRAGi N0._ 12256 ZONE. es — - ILL,, l / I I. r xj r f%YST ZONE •R3 i t WI '• fir- _,» MONTE VISTA; STREET ✓ V NORTH I CITY OF RANCHO CUCATMON'(A TrFL.E-:Iem r -r=-orx �s� PLANNING DIVNav EXHIBIT- "G" SCaiE-slTs . r; {i I � : � �, ��\ yw '. � � •� it ..s i i ice. I �`\\ fl 1 L r _ SE ti� Y II.I� r ..r �...� ... LEGEND !• ilk `• '^�.'� 4f.• ,.w f `Y'1�%'—u rf wV+!ll CeV..: I � yJ �ru. ...g w we •w `��L.w wWKll , 11 I ! fl t .a.A A •,..[ M [ �1 •wr+.wr = ; it ;1 1 �.rwtir � ' 1It w Y MONTE VISTA STREET a—— W— t T� w NORTH - ?fir /ENMETQh �LftCE �4 lICCSYN PAT!O ►ENCL CITY Or TTF�I: a�b R AiXCM CUCANNIONGA TITLE: M et•1 PLANNING DI\'LSiON EXHIIiTT: SCALE: ,r� ' .•r :� I ctcw n♦•..n i l 1 ♦ �I 'cew�.<.e,� ._, —I V'n,tF � �I e •\�' - �• I ...._ f:.d'I(l'LI�P.V.1'�.. 11 I \ \ � �• Y?LC4�,L M MMIN J•s ( .. a•ww:..a`r+.wa.v vstw*. as •ter J l .A'Tm HEd` LU V � NORTH CITY OF REM: -r-r i zz� PL A Vigil\'G DIVLStC'J EXHIBIT= "E„ __STALE. '�S. Si • • �i� 1l a �R� -�4 �Ea ZZ 20 lit cc jLl . i it t IL ' S e�vt vrsO NORTH CITY OF tTF�i- 'CTtZ�S+� R. \CHO CL.'CAIONGA rm�: mac PLt -N-NM DIVISON EXHIEiiT- �� JGaLE- WES . .� r T I 1 `4 1 •� A M1 .r. Y .A� A rt, � �; nnnlrn 11iJRi SIMMONS G 11 Yl �t �r �1 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY 1 PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the Project application is made. upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and make action no later than ten (10) days befcre the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of : three determinations 1) The project will have no significant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Repert will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further information concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Montana Vista Estates APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: BIDCAL Cora. 999` Santina Dr., Alta Lona, Ca., - c -yJ _' o NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Yenneth J. !lore or James Andres 9991 Santina Dr. Alta Loma LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) Northwest Corner of Monte Vita and Archibald LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None to 01+- knowledge I PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT- Twent fi:•e tjyct stor: attached 'homes for =n 21,e. � Z - - - -' „e ia�L'�:: SiZ6 O� G JiliS a SCLL 2SG tP_ree O °QrOOm � - hOT2S COTE, ^i n; ➢r live »n n-rr. .•.-, ... _.._ ____ —. - �• +Z:- .cl+ ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY- 2.16 acres, isxisti.-1Z old fra-ne 51d s __ppmx. 2-5& •• so ?L and Yro�c en cc — DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NC''ESSARv F )- LA Gentle southerly sloaine 2 acre site some old exists EE)la�t 1 _n^ ula -s and gees to remain (see Izndscarina nla a d1 - J �11rlTglC. cultural historical or ecen'c a- t �trd»e is cne o crnal owner., o_ suo 7ect aroDert ) -••-ro u.d. z_ pro +ert� zap man-,r tentative mans o: the seine nature. old -grace 77,1l " house some outa_das to oe removed and tenants a.re owners and intend to crn some of tr_e - srorosed tomes. Is this Project, part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? Not to our I�oaledse. I -2 LZ 1 ® WILL THIS PROJECT: YccS NO '{ 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? F7. 1 ICJ 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, Fire, water, sewage, etc.)? ` 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 3.=1' _ 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? n b. Create the need for use or disposal of _ potentially hazardous materials such as tc;-ic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YFF answers above: The e:_stin^ trees Y-e,, __. -- __ _ .._- e 8 "P n, O:' the eY�57.in^ Trees i.'Ito the rimes. IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Co=nittee. i D Signature v Ti tle_rj��„�.,. I -3 RESIDENTIAL CuNSI'RUCTIDN The fol i o„ri n- i Plannin Divisio, Me tion should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga school district to in order to' aidin assesstre the ability Of the sidential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No -: Cc-70, Tentative '^mot.: to -o_e Specific Location of Project: hiorthwert corr_er v o_ E ^ch3ca2d and lionte j4sta. 1• Number of single family units: 2- Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4- Earliest date of Occupancy: PHASE i PHASEL PH,1SE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 25 3s:ct P c nasin- to ea deie ^ir_ed b-., ft. tu_e dates None Sept. 1232 ::crab 983 1 I -4 �1 LJ N.odel # and # of Tentative S• Bedrooms PriceRang.z flan d- 2bd::zs :;7�,OGO.JO ?!a' 13- 3bd:zs 35,ca�.Ga 2bCr.-s 032,500.00 1 I -4 �1 LJ :a 0 RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT WP NO. 12256 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12256, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Bidcal Corporation, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a 2.10 acre site located on the northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Monte Vista Street, into 1 lot, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on November, 10, 1982; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12256 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or i�oprovements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is net likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to lumans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access thr3ugh or use of the property within ttie proposed subdivision. Resolution :to. Rage 2 (g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12256, a copy of whch is attached hereto is hereby approved subject to all of the follOwing conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. A directory be placed at the entrance tc the project illustrating the location of specific units. 2. Sidewalks shall be provided to the pool area along the rear and side of buildings 7 and 8. 3. The rear elevations of buildings 3 and 4 which face Archibald Avenue shall Lie upgraded with additional wood trim around the windows, or plant -ons. Revised plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. The emergency fire lane along the west property line shall be constructed of compacted granite with turf overlay. 5. Existing vegetation including trees, and shrubs along the west property line must be preserved wherever possible. A master plan of existing vegetation shall be submitted prior to approval of the final gyrading plan as required in Standard Condition C -2. 6. The detailed landscape plans shall include adequate provisions for screening adjacent residential units and the drainage course near the northwest corner of the property, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Division. ENGINEERING DIVISION 7. The developer shall be required to construct the Master Plan Storm Drain on Archibald Avenue adjacent to the proposed Tract from northerly boundary to existing outlet structure at the SPRR. The cost of the system shall be credited towards the drainage fee for the project and a reimbursement agreement per City Ordinance No. 75, will be executed by the City for the contributions which exceed the amount of the fee. El C' J LA 11 Resolution No. Page 3 8. The applicant shall try to coordinate the storm drain work with that of the approved projects - Tentative Tracts 11173 and 11608. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopter; by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: 5% 9 NI ` L G 9 9 r 2 e N 4 ✓ d r v J L � L c i + e ° u C .• i G V v v - o - c O J V T ou M- a l G C � 14 11 y q ' L a 6 V q y =✓ v ~� C V P l a�- ° � o -. ✓c c° b o u.. .Y. -.. e. p r V 9 = C e j ✓ � V .0. q O A � C O G OL w u ° -' O r •Ce v 6 = y e y L n A V 9 r V r � 9no•u V 6 ^wL V y V r O V y i r L 9 nq wq d �LVG � 0` ^L 6Nd V + � y n C L O 9 ^ ^ J= O V V C b q ^ 6 .� p j C l•O..w � y ar r V V t� Y 9 _ o � V✓ a r � P .L. v E V ]� p L 6 q C q p c ... w d a y9 �W Om n0 �w y r yC 9W YCV� r r ^ �L 6V CJ 0 ��vi�0• ^ qo Pr •a ✓ V JO VLi r k Ov d. gCr9 +Ey L.. r M L r n NC 6A +n0 h 6u0. VCi� L 2 H 2 Li` ���4 V V C� 4 L H V 1 i O O V N C C V O � C q 9 M L N G y •W qL 9i C L T W a O q C C! pL O G o O t C •N C V C i d uY w 1 � v =q r0 L r v o O+ q T yJj > G N g C N O P ✓ w V c p^ L V d V O ✓ V O � L V � d4 q L —d •q q C V .L... � =9 v - V C N l C = V A r 9 V V N q i r T ✓u ^s io °s N' L ^ C •-- p L � L •in q J V L N 9 V yvr >.eP ._� 4 C C •O.r L CL N ^ b _ d ? 4e. oz OtiO V vZ S r v 9 _O o e e C O 4 l q 9 6 q V L C V u D y V O L q V 7 — c o V 6 e C b q N a .L. N V 00 n CG C L r L V N� O J q •O T c QUO C — V A L r, c c T 6 L G O V d C q + C^ � y 6 4 u J N � V ` V "Va ` ev 0:5b o a � c � C 9 C �q ^ p _ o G O✓ F V O_O✓ V N C N N V c r •iLi L = Or, — y 9 v C q 4 O N « a J N PL c r v �• h 7z, O q`= _ _ R q r 9 A V L q L q q _ 9 � O N C y C L rF _� U L L N a�LL4j ✓ 6 A r p c •L..• V G_ L v.L.0 loc r e L V✓ � r 6 CG r V « O V G L 4 y V ` � •Ln °d O + A d 9 n 4 y p l V L y A V N � NI� H I ! V e L Q A d 9 w j L L V q > V 6 L V M P V V V> a a ✓ C q C V tl9 9r LY�.� 1vY V 9v_ q9 • ✓a �LJ V= JV r 9 G C Y Y a y e r Cw V O w A O.9.r C GCi�� q^ PGA N >p C� V✓ q N 16 O L q t V q V J ]� ^ V > C t C Lp� L L = T C N E q f C L C N b pp d � a G� C 9� ✓�✓ a 'e o'er iq vv o =o =i 0 0 -Z V L N C C r V �• ✓w e J q ✓ V L.N qe Vy.O.r OIV. 1�4 r 06 ` L N N V F L V L r p q y L A N L y N qua NL o Ct� N ^ C t w u q y V i d � q G 9 + 4 G C �c 9 ✓ q C V YIP« + 9 i+ G� L r N }f 4 4 r N r rP i C c « P C i 6 NI G ' P P U C L V V =0 Gr✓ SAC 4 9 a W r 9 r s E mac= i Na. p� W H u 8 V V 9Y.p •Li qr DM = a' rVr y e ✓ C L o J r V O O y L N9 o ~ P` 6 O V tz _ W r r r q N V �s A O C ry L a o q q ✓ Q � eC C 4 Njr Jam✓ LM V C G C^ .r ^ O r + y O O V O + L r 4 N =r•` =� 4 6 9 V J Q C F 9 C w r V c r Q ~ _ g via To 1 ^r -i Z N !f L I ✓� W � C T` A �.^ V O p G L v r 1 e 6 u d S_ N W N ✓ + C r r0 .r0 t' S ',� pC r O CL� 1 N C YL•� GLOi O O V N C C V O � C q 9 M L N G y •W qL 9i C L T W a O q C C! pL O G o O t C •N C V C i d uY w 1 � v =q r0 L r v o O+ q T yJj > G N g C N O P ✓ w V c p^ L V d V O ✓ V O � L V � d4 q L —d •q q C V .L... � =9 v - V C N l C = V A r 9 V V N q i r T ✓u ^s io °s N' L ^ C •-- p L � L •in q J V L N 9 V yvr >.eP ._� 4 C C •O.r L CL N ^ b _ d ? 4e. oz OtiO V vZ S r v 9 _O o e e C O 4 l q 9 6 q V L C V u D y V O L q V 7 — c o V 6 e C b q N a .L. N V 00 n CG C L r L V N� O J q •O T c QUO C — V A L r, c c T 6 L G O V d C q + C^ � y 6 4 u J N � V ` V "Va ` ev 0:5b o a � c � C 9 C �q ^ p _ o G O✓ F V O_O✓ V N C N N V c r •iLi L = Or, — y 9 v C q 4 O N « a J N PL c r v �• h 7z, O q`= _ _ R q r 9 A V L q L q q _ 9 � O N C y C L rF _� U L L N a�LL4j ✓ 6 A r p c •L..• V G_ L v.L.0 loc r e L V✓ � r 6 CG r V « O V G L 4 y V ` � •Ln °d O + A d 9 n 4 y p l V L y A V N � NI� H I ! V e L Q A d 9 w j L L V q > V 6 L V M P V V V> a a ✓ C q C V tl9 9r LY�.� 1vY V 9v_ q9 • ✓a �LJ V= JV r 9 G C Y Y a y e r Cw V O w A O.9.r C GCi�� q^ PGA N >p C� V✓ q N 16 O L q t V q V J ]� ^ V > C t C Lp� L L = T C N E q f C L C N b pp d � a G� C 9� ✓�✓ a 'e o'er iq vv o =o =i 0 0 -Z V L N C C r V �• ✓w e J q ✓ V L.N qe Vy.O.r OIV. 1�4 r 06 ` L N N V F L V L r p q y L A N L y N qua NL o Ct� N ^ C t w u q y V i d � q G 9 + 4 G C �c 9 ✓ q C V YIP« + 9 i+ G� L r N }f 4 4 r N r rP i C c « P C i 6 NI r•1 G P P C L V V =0 Gr✓ SAC 4 9 a r 9 r E mac= i Na. p� N u 8 V 9Y.p •Li qr DM = r d y e ✓ C L = r L C C ✓ y L N9 P` 6 O V tz r r q N V A O C ry Ndy q q ✓ LTV � eC C 4 Njr Jam✓ LM V C G C^ .r ^ /• r + y O N i + L r 4 N =r•` =� 4 6 9 V J Q C F 9 C w r L i c r via To 1 ^r -i Z N !f w 4 ✓� C T` A �.^ V G L r•1 - P > = L � � ° uRr Le» C C q L_ N p OL C rf O q « Vc CL w°n4 L• S yL ✓- O � -_ q -rNC 49 wV C�N �w V C Rc ur -� IR`� L yVL�. -'. ✓r O V9 V Y.- ^V� r 4f'T M ..r w' wq.- I-rV y ✓C.r 60O L V v q =0 T° Cq .°i v 9 �W C.4 � ` Y G._.r- .V•.Vr C� q O « q L I L L •• 4 V D N f F C •= I [+ q M u t q r O O C C 2 r✓ V C r L G a ': i b r q C ✓ N A y G Y d G L `M l P W c a y= 4 d w.Cn - V' CL • T'^ OY T V GL cAE ✓� OL ^U � _ ✓C.n ✓.]uG� V C V Au7 -ice °� ru yg� 9C \.SPY C� L V NN w � a ✓'J tw•- -. �LV � p p �u pW L v T O Z v ° —o ° NM br. m. v� bl { Me° �TO ✓« ° ems ✓v. L, CEO OI4 Tr° .V..tp 6�N A� L N 01 q 1 �qV LV4 P � .e IN C1r O.>n 4 00 ° Lp^ P ^E v I ° c u � a•A r ° v ANUo br °N OC N >ry I QE Ha' y 4 r Y" 4�N L .Ca W ° y r C O ✓ r C \r v a^i `Y V° r L C V = fCj O: G «Y C rV� C �CIP CQ -I 4 Y ° e rl✓' L .ndR N u (.:. �G VC"vbn p _ FL H M v 4 u >.� ` > N N O � d Cq V pp L N _V V 4 t• \. O 7 4 P N C �' y y u _ V qI CiG O tiYu FL-ao u ILO...r •ri >o P = _O L 0 W G cW �� -•cP Lc �a _° b 4 -O.... . . �O p� CL .. g °r« .Le os GC N� �- V Nor - _ �.c .-yo A•" OC ' 9N p =V� CNpL GrM� T V L -,s •" L V q� v C✓ 'n O. C g v O �e L V N C` q N 6 q Q•y ✓ L_ �_ P w r q -_ O O C 'J 4 C° c ^ L } N �1 yL 00 =G� w•Iy LrjC9 y °' VOA TP L gVLLLV qN4 r VL C. •'4 FmV �P uLy qL Lp -�O �q v PC V••J �w°..�0 ..r> N�� V _ a q V ° y L >- -• L t r q C Vv ^ V L C V 9 N q> L L V k V N C G �q °T 'wN 4 4= 7 aYi °O >> LV �K T AV•.> 40.N~ O r V V O r _C •yf'''�• E^ L � u s C O i G✓ v" Cl� i _p r= US �• � L L �� rp w/ . U N C r p� p 4° 4 C• J° Cl C J i r. 4 G 'w `J V ° C C L N C O r E F C Y V q . O q G- V n i s L r T y •L• f. E 4� w✓ r q .LU C C Lr i'VC° 9. 4V l-.6 wVy 0✓ LCU br CVV 6 E J � � � r q P • o w o -• ` u c w a .r r °7 u a. o✓ R • P Y, J L 0 9 C N °C d A N y -q� Cr t.n G--4 =-y� V Y v PCOV y'y �• 9 L C i ✓� _ 4 ^ O r -. q y� V. r C N V ^ p L r c q N L� 4 9 q Vw .V -.CqO L. yL G °T � ^4N O V '-VVr LrONCV �✓ ii N C 4 P C u -. y = t •-A i L w• u C` ✓• CIE ° L- A 4a✓ b C -V'� G `V Ly p �LqL °✓ _ 09 �. -L° _r er C L n t C 9 C v L q _9 ° � -^ L y cc C_ q> V °r ° ' T tq^ p p Nw4i °OLN N rip 4qp �jdu L..- C iV .-T9 Cr VCw7 e. r> N V L CN S4i- r q> ^p2 N P Fi L.C4 4 -_ Ngr 6•L.�OCSO J= VgVC V L VN -r4� NO „ObVCy� Ey-.0 ° ^ 4 L 6 N r> J b P L f,. L R R L !;V~ �p y wL'' NNLr 69 - NN_ q�vP pM -`L --C `. `. >\A d =- NS.LC"N ° n4 -GOL r�C �4.L t L j� e �_ � V�•-. .°CR ° 6 C M= L 3: P > O Vv r .'f 4 V ND M -L PPU�•=~ C� p _ - CC�� y r.4e� V NLr L N V 6 P tLi Y r _ 4 rr b q L C q C .Vi ✓ V N l q o ► < t ► i v 2 C= ww .w O L-"' 4a u4 Pr.IO CI�VN 2 «C. ao <-W-2 e�py� V ®V Cy GT_ V r V u 7 w A r F +Sp Oa...• 2` O N a E V y y C L Y L ^ r �r c •4 �' e.Jr N L N Pm P J< =VN 9L O'J 6 e D o s q w C V p .Oir i tv -2 o' -ov E L= . r✓ w CK C s t C 2 i O° O •O C y° rrpi ^S�VL.A -c-ui N " �A1GrrL°.d t4iL C G � L O t C _ c r_ A r � z _ d C G T tl +N y S J v r a _ s c9 e L i O V a L c r ° C ^ G O N'y « O C V . 9 y N C C V F N= C « O - c C v ++O rn P N O .i .0 J C t d ° �Li A a o n ^ a' INNg�r l y p IA' ° W' +q � A9� I O l O « ^ Gc j =Gr= « rrr L A y «Jt C VLL L r u tl ° b � O . 9 C V 7 _ V' P>t rr V9 n r L L PV _- O = L V G W J W iE WL' I C L' tC.r q r 6 C ^ O r• J L pOa A x V «qN K V C V O yp C ; O C' V y 6p 9 > v Na G9 _ y N 9 L d - r N W C,u C LW°F � u C •+ L V O ° O _y < u rLi q r_ s c n cA t•« °L .coaC YP °� iD a C m •' O d LOY LrrV V VP �> LrJr•L'S r� 11 � I O L `�NLW .. G O .COOru P r K V NI C. L am✓ �• C a/ L V r N 1 C r _ � X 4 0 w T L O- 9 O O v u y � J C � + G L r i i f .°. L.r ^ 4v O� n `mow 4-•� P °a A O r y r•. V PN 2CS i p7L P C °9 A W°r) a'O At V> C u = n. +L.w N r` Y -r dy�tr',G ca L. 'v 5 �✓. i coc s « u c c`•�c ° w9NN 9 a c 9 LLa - ro = T OL°•O« ` tLG « � ytrr r �..rrr �• � .Nip C V� 'Nor L�9 cco� V Jr- � Ls FycyF °C O�d�EV �WCr.` °�C �, V`•i p y�� ° U�� + `T` a N p «p rn <' rA `r_6L •yam d r G _ C a D u w 2 V« C + n L W L J O P ^ L v V l r W P r rp i tlu � r T L i V Y a � � •� ° n C r p I n N S L O� ` ^i „ J °7.°.N � ` °' W 9ea ° .°. L•'� �.. N« A� �O -��.= -E.'or au °• o°�i. c ii -.. r Y c 9 orr` -L YA. LL �`. "I u'ci^ n n-t: LAr N =e cqo: F arao "O� u ° ° q ono d OAL d �•,�V A9 -�T L y' rV"y9L d 4N F J•nAC LC Ou w a, O 4•°.ru f >C P•- ° 'Y V L 4 VGq N` rJn - r« C �' L u COL V a W iL p WA gun r �wr drA � -"DVOU rf°j rarJ� OcP O' r r ON .. � OwV 6gr�dN •� L^ n OV•o •a CCwO NO �S Cw•- L C9L _rwW -.� L `c O �� V NLO C'Y C,C0.9 4 L CCq' Ur��L O V •a C +nt' O.V.r On Y.A. QNOO «.O A +�u Ny PO 9 J C Vd i _ ®V Cy GT_ V r V u 7 w A r F +Sp Oa...• 2` O N a E V y y C L Y L ^ r �r c •4 �' e.Jr N L N Pm P J< =VN 9L O'J 6 e D o s q w C V p .Oir i tv -2 o' -ov E L= . r✓ w CK C s t C 2 i O° O •O C y° rrpi ^S�VL.A -c-ui N " �A1GrrL°.d t4iL C G � L O t C _ c r_ A r � z _ d C G T tl +N y S J v r a _ s c9 e L i O V a L c r ° C ^ G O N'y « O C V . 9 y N C C V F N= C « O - c C v ++O rn P N O .i .0 J C t d ° �Li A a o n ^ a' INNg�r l y p IA' ° W' +q � A9� I O l O « ^ Gc j =Gr= « rrr L A y «Jt C VLL L r u C - c ° o Y crd. �aa c c c�co A A 9 V tl ° b G 9 C V 7 _ V' P>t rr V9 n r L L PV _- O = L V G W J W iE WL' I C L' tC.r q r 6 C ^ O r• J L pOa A x V «qN K V C V O yp C ; O C' V y 6p 9 > v Na G9 _ y N 9 L d r N W C,u C LW°F � u C •+ L V O ° O N u rLi as IFS ZL. NpN v J _ q ` C A uW c u •c -a cru` C m •' 4 V N •• O n•J q O 11 I qY `�NLW G O K V NI L°•��A r PC C - c ° o Y crd. �aa c c c�co A A 9 V tl ' V r P>t rr I + r L L r Y I IV C- L' tC.r uir I - •- c 6 C ^ L JNu « 9 - p _ C' �c c o Na V y N 9 L - a• +• G V ' ` O a V •n O N r S l as IFS ZL. NpN v O 9 °e uW c u •c -a cru` C m •' 4 V 11 I �rC `�NLW L°•��A PC 9 d •- j _ u � G O S N? r°GO A y« GC OdW Y -r dy�tr',G V_nur f. « u rJnl «V . w9NN wi ��L - h4r'�w NL"�V OL°•O« ` tLG « � ytrr r �..rrr �• � .Nip C V� 'Nor L�9 cco� V Jr- � Ls FycyF �nGY O�d�EV �WCr.` V �, V`•i n nJ9 p0 Lc7� -u N G.°i coo V u - C V P G= C ° Oa V O w w C � V m u E ='r i r A tV. « Y O v L � O L L 1 � NI 6 r V ai V rn G l V G L r r ; G C c a 7 r9 •D L° N V Nw L ` ra T 6 M` N + J V r i - N S l++ r tl ✓ 'j I + L L r Y I IV C- L' tC.r uir I - •- c 6 C ^ L JNu « 9 - p �c c o Na V y N 9 L - a• +• G V ' ` O a V •n O N r S l C L` I 4 V 11 I V u - C V P G= C ° Oa V O w w C � V m u E ='r i r A tV. « Y O v L � O L L 1 � NI 6 r V ai V rn G l V G L r r ; G C c a 7 r9 •D L° N V Nw L ` ra T 6 M` N + J V r i - N S l++ r b E 7 .y. Y r ` 1 J aiovi r = a Ia o crG o f I Lr � w L• _a O i � Y= j v rr w O L G N C V N m •L... �� ✓ os.• e ' y mS Ar.Q C Cti m � V C Q _ rJ 9 O•.n 5� m P EL l ram• .d.. IC r C� V OpQ � C I IF J C J Gaa _I 9G4� Ow d_VV 2•. V e= d 6 O O 2 N C G G V V w (c V (• N � _ C p = L q = V C Z.2 r C G. r 4 ` 4. Lr C�VIp q 4 q u U d_ J :.•.� = U L vp o. w a _ q AOI I m r G G q O `; yI I V Od ugVy �6T EE P ?aq ZZ crG o f v Lr � w L• _a O i � w G N C V N m •L... �� ✓ os.• dN y Cti �_ 4O_ _ r O•.n `N P EL l ram• .d.. r 9G4� Ow d_VV 2•. V e= d 6 O O 2 N C G G V V w (c V (• N � _ C p = L q = V C Z.2 r C G. r P q 4 q u U d_ J :.•.� = U L _ o. w a _ q AOI m r G G q O V Od ugVy �6T EE P ?aq ZZ r q n 6C L q r 4 C V C 4 y N 1 U r y r AY r, ) 4 N _y L=AG r 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: November 10, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND COiiDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -20 - SHARMA - The development of a 3,691 square foot elementary school on 3/4 acres located at 9113 Foothill Boulevard - APN 208- 241 -09. Relaxed File: Conditional Use Permit 81 -08 ABSTRACT: The Applicant, Satyendra Sharma, is seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit for two temporary trailers and a building addition to expand the existing Foothill Learning School at 9113 Foothill Boulevard (Exhibit "A "). The existing preschool was approved by the Planning Commission on May 28, 1981 and has been in operation since September 1981. The temporary trailers will be used as classrooms during construction of the permanent building addition. The new addition will house a libraryiresource center, offices, and classrooms for K -3. The project site is located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, across from the Gemco shopping center (Exhibit "A "). The site is bounded on all sides by vacant land and contains several mature trees and shrubs. Full street improvements, landscaping, fencing, outdoor recreation space, and a parking lot were completed under the previous CUP approval. The preschool property is zoned R -1, is surrounded by property zoned R -3, and designated Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) under the General Plan. ANALYSIS: The following is a summary of the parking requirements, based upon information st-pplied by the applicant in Exhibit "F ": Preschool 4 teachers ty iii 4 48 children @ 1/5 10 K -3 3 teachers @ 1/1 3 60 children @ none required 0 Full time Director @ lil I TOTAL I ITEM H Conditional Use Permit 82 -20 /Sharma Planning Commission Agenda November 10, 1982 Page 2 The existing preschool parking lot has 14 spaces. The proposed Site Plan, Exhibit "B °, would expand the parking lot to provide a total of 18 parking spaces. The temporary trailers would be located in the southwest corner of the propertl•. The available land for outdoor recreation space exceeds State requirements. DESIGN REVIEW C%14ITTEE: The Committee met on September 21, 1932 to review this project and has worked with the Applicant in resolving concerns relative to arcnitecture, landscaping, and the timing of construction. The Committee was concerned that the architectural detailing of the addition be consistent with the existing structure, as noted on the elevations, Exhibit °E ". Further, the addition has been set back ten (10) feet from the west property line to provide room for landscaping and to- satisfy Building Code requirements. The Committee recommended that a time limit be established to begin construction of the addition and remove the temporary trailers. The attached Resolution rantains conditions reflecting these concerns. FACTS FOR FINDING: Based upon a review of the information provided by the App icant and the site, the proposed uses are consistent with the General Plan and applicable Zoning Ordinance provisions. The size of the buildings, playground, and parking lot will adequately service the proposed uses. The proposed uses would be compatible with surrounding future development with the adoption of the recommended Conditions of Approval. CORRESPONDENCE: A public Fearing notice was advertised in The Dail Report newspaper on October 29, i982. In addition, approximately nine pub ic hearing notices were sent to property owners within 300 feet of t:ie project site. To date, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. RECOIi ENDATiON: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider a�nput and material relative to this project. A Resolution of Approval with Conditions is provided for your review and consideration. R4pectfuljg submitted, Planner RG:DC:jr Conditional Use Permit 82 -20 /Sharma Planning Commission Agenda November 10, 1982 Page 3 Attachments_ Exhibit "A" - Location Mao Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Iilustrative Site Plan Exhibit "0" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Elevations Exhibit "r" - Letter from Applicant E _ _ .:n n�i mnHU ■ a � uaa �nnu�f OR CITY PUNNING s y 'Sw ` l b b. - -1 i� s i_ I "OI ' ? -O 67 41C, r • %ROF %�I: 3,69J Sol J -L ? .�� t Ttn."r1+ea.fY �/G iIN��La"S''i I , rLM L'w.".y >q'i4I ; n 1 t,ii t i t t, a Ease 3.G ! P.�RIr�!•rQ. . t i I. 1 1 1 7 1 i _ }•� u h; i ;i l i i ! l.ti r V i j v � t c•v � y 1 I PAnIi ./ILT� ___ -- .ryr .Ildr- it • %ROF %�I: 3,69J Sol J -L ? .�� t Ttn."r1+ea.fY �/G iIN��La"S''i I , rLM L'w.".y >q'i4I ; n 1 t,ii t i t t, a Ease 3.G ! P.�RIr�!•rQ. . t i I. 1 1 1 CI L Y OF rrENi- (A)P 0'044o m m BL � CHO CJ'CANIO\O:i . ms: SMS Pty! PLANNING IXXr N EXHIBIT. SCA[.E. 7 1 i _ }•� u h; i ;i i i ! V i j v � t CI L Y OF rrENi- (A)P 0'044o m m BL � CHO CJ'CANIO\O:i . ms: SMS Pty! PLANNING IXXr N EXHIBIT. SCA[.E. 7 .2 i. . ........ I CITY OF 000 RAINCHO CuCANjo.XGA rrENI:---CeW-PAft--ZO PLAMt\.r-w -49::-P SCALE: 0 I J-. E. ---------------------- 7, T zos t3'- El - %0 CITY RANCHO CUCANIONCYA PLANNING MTb N Ar MARIO.-Ilom W-AMM-W. a ✓ 15��1 INORTI H CITY OF RAIN MO -MC ,Jo`C MANNING EXN%M v -0 \G• a ;S II � it v = 7* IITLE: EXHIBIT- ___ SCALE= 11 E E E 'al LU'rnn icy. IAo �exjetoon,z „x 6ece Strs� tl.� � �aD.il L Y181il (1lQri4. - �'l�n_ TD i i0 w i ,�} Gi �Afid,P: i l tl jilt �: L �oSzGi 2lC1 15 tc^tL L' Lill( G l Ll ([t I r p� W w` i t4 rZw I.CiU� -{Lz. f3 lLO W 1 r�c� . fesoti+rce c.k�LxEY. LAS Cl)-7 c v RESOLUTION NO. * A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCA14ONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0, 82 -20 FOR TE14PORARY TRAILERS AND BUILDING ADDITION FOR A PRESCHOOL AND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATED AT 9113 FOOTHILL IN THE R -1 ZONE WHEREAS, on the 3rd day of September; 1982, a complete application was filed by Satyendra Sharma for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 10th day of November, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. follows: NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as SECTION 1: That the following findings can be riet: i. That the propose-, 1 use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purpo_es of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions appiicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use w :" comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Toning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on November 10, 1982. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -20 is approved. subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION: 1. The temporary facilities are approved for a two -year period from the date of occupancy and shall be removed from the site within thirty (30) days from the date of occupancy of the permanent addition. 2. That building permits shall be obtained for the permanent building addition within twelve (12) months from the date of occupancy of the temporary facilities. Resolution No. Page 2 3. As a Conditional Use Permit, this approval shall become null and 'void if final occupancy is not issued for the temporary facilities or buildino Permits issued for the permanent addition within eighteen (18) months from the date of approval, unless an extension is granted by the Planning CO"tiss ion. 4. The temporary facilities shall not be located on the site until the parking lot expansion is complete. 5. Expansion of the preschool beyond 48 children or expansion of the K -3 beyond 60 children will require approval of a modified Conditional Use Permit. 6. Landscaping, including trees and shrubs, shall be planted around the south and west perimeter of the property, and between the parking lot and the playground. 7. All laws and regulations of the State relating to the licensing of children's day care facilities and elementary schools shall be compl'ed with. S. The existing circulatior aisie along the west side of the existing structure shall be provided with pavement striping stating "Fire Lane' and "No Stopping" signs posted in clearly visible locations. 9. The following improvements are required in the existing parking areas to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official: (1) repairing depressions in the pavement for proper drainage, (2) construction of a drainage structure to carry water from the parking area to the drainage opening in the south block wall, and (3) removal of the curb along the southerly boundary of the parking lot and replacement with a portland concrete cement curb am gutter in accordance with the approved Grading Plar for CUP 81 -08. These improvements shall be completed iP conjunction Nith the parking lot expansion prior to occupancy of the temporary facilities. 10. A sample of the bu >lding materials ShalI be submitted to the Design Review Committee prior to issuance of building permits. 11 11 E Resolution No. Page 3 ENGINEERING, DIVISION: 11. A landscaped median island is required along Foothill and a median island lien agreement on in- lieu cash deposit shall be required prior to issuance of building permit. 12. Street lights are required along Foothill Boulevard. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1982. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA140NGA BY: Jeffrey King, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I, JACK LAS, Secretary of the Planning Commnission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10 *_h day of November, 1982, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: L 6 0 O W + O p r ~ Z O S V u LL p V Z y O E r� A Y 9 V O 4 ✓ N 9 T o> a ' O v 44 qq qL_ ✓ p Y. IqV O C y y q J y r v + L q S o ✓ 9 V L �Y po L u V N V V q ` - o t = L P w V C Y y > + J q J l L n « b = � 9 q q c� .rnv ,I .I r ^ V � N O O q O 6 9 O e V L i Le V u g l .V. V q r = C o ` 9 a _ N � ✓ F v� O n c n ^ C c � q V C qE l' M y a ° ^ v 4 0 V a X J a O O O' �I r V ti .n Z V r 0 �o < L, d l jL A c w ✓ L L .. d ✓ y C L � L 9 V O O r O q V O W✓ y � d q C l S9 C C O M7 ..r � J ✓ r 4 u q L d«.rJiu � ✓ aG q.`.y u L b_ c p�n u 9 w •• « v Q O L C« V� qy V b cL° r manic «.L v.rr 6 e r «� •_ « L L G_ 3 u ^ o N JL« r q•nay� r �� w uC .JrCO N Tu q CC 4 C � ✓ + PO�A _✓ l0 n d%r 9c ` V + r r✓ r V ✓ C 9 V. L C q q� du V �..L LCEC Q5 �9�`O d VA w� �yP `L O_C ... ✓� ql _O V O L P G V OS �� qy q'_ � V L V ar• v O t M W V V2 C2 M c ^I I N N N N •I I I I I I NI b C n d� - v 9 1 O A n� n� q C L_ V L_ C 2 .+ V C C O V V b V � q rJ q w� i O v� q C w C V F � N� V G � O �C O q .. y y u L ^9 qq C .T. y v O r e° .O r v o O n n T V C O q 6 9y C V q T >_ i d V ^ N w .Vi nG wo dq yT q" C d iJ _ b ✓� 3 r N ~ O J q O < p V q r L O � q T`n 6 L f l V V d V 6 d � t V + r V u U r ✓ 72 z_a z 2 C q _ n ✓ l u d O t4 r .2 .2 u ` ^E V V d E C✓p t•S i q V r ` C _ p ✓ t ✓ C 4 J q u.- 4 F i ` V ✓ u L 9 u V C O C r ✓ C •C9 1 N C G + de- 85 _ E - < w C r V�d Nu r� L V a 7 q N � N I i r 4 0 V v uG r � c � C P a c� E C y u i V �e O r c 1 N m A q '+ C C C 41 nN q� C tiI � e nN L� ^ G O « 0 P i y y V 4 - oI f 4� m V L 3 L C d O✓ O � O + q C t b _ F = o N L O A ✓ p N V r _ _ Y _p L q• C 4+yi T G + V L G YV 6 L r + 9 Q Qq r 0 y d 6 V -o q C 3 C n _ctN r A N C NLO O �� '0 9 1 ✓ = �O LM O�� CnCV q� L C v W V ✓ ty' � frA = V O C d r N. V S V V Y f .aiV C M C O y J+ L 4 ✓ VNP n 2 = q « z n V P _ N y✓ C O � ^O C ATE N 90W_ l qS p M rNS q0 OLL.0 orw rcr >S 'O CFa uc L .Si. LOi .L. .d.n q d yyd 6y �A •COQ Q n.°. 4 M O L C 7�� N� n4« s nT p T 20 C O O � d l 0 T..V q0 '��A V 4i �'. V ✓�� G Y r y ry L •p � q CY CG O V./r Oy q9r AqC qy OV~ O LVN V�q q' +.q �L itr r N V • J � _N L _ = C q L•K >« t` Rey � O �C O q .. y y u L ^9 qq C .T. y v O r e° .O r v o O n n T V C O q 6 9y C V q T >_ i d V ^ N w .Vi nG wo dq yT q" C d iJ _ b ✓� 3 r N ~ O J q O < p V q r L O � q T`n 6 L f l V V d V 6 d � t V + r V u U r ✓ 72 z_a z 2 C q _ n ✓ l u d O t4 r .2 .2 u ` ^E V V d E C✓p t•S i q V r ` C _ p ✓ t ✓ C 4 J q u.- 4 F i ` V ✓ u L 9 u V C O C r ✓ C •C9 1 N C G + de- 85 _ E - < w C r V�d Nu r� L V a 7 q N � N I i r 4 0 V v uG r � c � C P a c� E C y u i V �e O r c 1 N m A q '+ C C C 41 nN q� C tiI � e nN L� ^ G O « 0 P i y y V 4 - oI f 4� m V L V 9 O F = o N L O A ✓ p N C 4+yi F G G + V L G YV 6 2yyy "cO �r u t Q V -o c+i n _ctN NLO O �� '0 9 1 ✓ = V L C v W V ✓ ty' � V = V V V Y f O 4 C y J+ L 4 ✓ _ uNa 'O uc L q d V N G 4 M O L C 7�� N� n4« s nT p COGM uOd T..V q0 '��A G 4i CY n« nr A qy OV~ O LVN V�q q' +.q �L itr r N V • J � _N L _ = O O n d- 0 c ` UZ « � V O« C L q= ^. p «u Z « S C •e O LLp u+ Ld= � 1 L A 1 u 6 v. a L.. d � u b � oyq P+ O «� S V= �Lr. ✓ c - a 4 c c _ � q M V d Y O p w C n c O iL Y `o- F C t E ° S « q O ! M L L •y i q C ✓ > L ?L •� b P q C u^ � r q F.� °W q V - y P N�•L � T P «q Q ryn � b „ L y C C S E L u_ « r y O c L n 4q° d L b ✓ C q u V 2 V L 4 L _ G G w T .. oyrr ✓ C C .q. G ° C� q V O O y L NL �YL d + L 10 b O v w O c q «Oq p _ « + G V a t'6m 0 y O d c C L r j G O Y O O r 4 q « G T y V r S a c °q o L r .°r L F L u o Lo q> L L C V C n ° b bJ C f L L J y � V V o � V e� Li d w a _ L qt V L d p -I �d rijG G L _FL •'O r 00 L q L r q i O q V y L y V T + i� � qr qury Z C O n « V S d q q L L.'. y •LJ j q d } c N C V V o c✓ L r.• r^u �ru we N G V y n ur b P 6� j _ u � Y j y � • L ^> U Y _ S S V OJ ° q OranO rrrq � cb Go { u !G .• rye <o aMy PVo C L L Lw 0VL ✓,r6 q y O rn O C L .rdi y.� G T — ' "'ri CGyri q° + p a- i✓ L o _ q C` ur «�••'GV •• r a a 7 i Vlf u ✓ V 1 L ^ > •nGi .� i °> o L _ V L O C q V IV S u a o c h 4 P V b ✓ r d � a ^- � 1 j Q q re O LS `7 IIV C & G L 1 P= p t ~ a P L r �- V ✓ _ q V ` r^ 6 a � O r• � L n r d I ! ! -o'- L C O B t TO_S O p ✓ u _ u L S✓ y« G 6 _ r. O « ✓ V POOL • F r. r V L + U ° 4 C r Iy a � �10 Iq > ✓✓ 4 r P q .r., y q 4 S J �. ° 1 •a c r.L TNT q ✓oc ccly "C N � e�m�ro! °6 r V N O c`. •��V Y_ nb n L O °r L V O• ✓ L G" = q + d y o N C C✓ ��« G > b u a 0 «7 dC Cb .^rjpygVL�r � °d « ° '.rV .N..er Pp .. J a q✓ G z°, y c o OrC Tt y q VSy r+ 6C u yV��{ Oy�� Py L•qr _ °E C ✓OT.a. q.ric it wZgN y0 brr «r^�L. Vq ✓�P riir O O •- f P q � 1 'L'q�:." E _ ._✓ ^gin ✓race _ c« <Orp :r „tom cc y a FN L• M G C p r V L C 1 8 w V q r G o q v c o q V ° a 1= b L co A� V i oY V o +qa ry V L 0 N m I I • `�, a q « j j ` G L _FL •'O r 00 L q L r q i O q V y L y V T + i� � qr qury Z C O n « V S d q q L L.'. y •LJ j q d } c N C V V o c✓ L r.• r^u �ru we N G V y n ur b P 6� j _ u � Y j y � • L ^> U Y _ S S V OJ ° q OranO rrrq � cb Go { u !G .• rye <o aMy PVo C L L Lw 0VL ✓,r6 q y O rn O C L .rdi y.� G T — ' "'ri CGyri q° + p a- i✓ L o _ q C` ur «�••'GV •• r a a 7 i Vlf u ✓ V 1 L ^ > •nGi .� i °> o L _ V L O C q V IV S u a o c h 4 P V b ✓ r d � a ^- � 1 j Q q re O LS `7 IIV C & G L 1 P= p t ~ a P L r �- V ✓ _ q V ` r^ 6 a � O r• � L n r d I ! ! -o'- L C O B t TO_S O p ✓ u _ u L S✓ y« G 6 _ r. O « ✓ V POOL • F r. r V L + U ° 4 C r Iy a � �10 Iq > ✓✓ 4 r P q .r., y q 4 S J �. ° 1 •a c r.L TNT q ✓oc ccly "C N � e�m�ro! °6 r V N O c`. •��V Y_ nb n L O °r L V O• ✓ L G" = q + d y o N C C✓ ��« G > b u a 0 «7 dC Cb .^rjpygVL�r � °d « ° '.rV .N..er Pp .. J a q✓ G z°, y c o OrC Tt y q VSy r+ 6C u yV��{ Oy�� Py L•qr _ °E C ✓OT.a. q.ric it wZgN y0 brr «r^�L. Vq ✓�P riir O O •- f P q � 1 'L'q�:." E _ ._✓ ^gin ✓race _ c« <Orp :r „tom cc y a FN L• M G C p r V L C 1 8 w V q r G o q v c o q V ° a 1= b L co A� V i oY V o +qa ry V L 0 N m I I • `�, Y _ S S V OJ ° q OranO rrrq � cb Go { u !G .• rye <o aMy PVo C L L Lw 0VL ✓,r6 q y O rn O C L .rdi y.� G T — ' "'ri CGyri q° + p a- i✓ L o _ q C` ur «�••'GV •• r a a 7 i Vlf u ✓ V 1 L ^ > •nGi .� i °> o L _ V L O C q V IV S u a o c h 4 P V b ✓ r d � a ^- � 1 j Q q re O LS `7 IIV C & G L 1 P= p t ~ a P L r �- V ✓ _ q V ` r^ 6 a � O r• � L n r d I ! ! -o'- L C O B t TO_S O p ✓ u _ u L S✓ y« G 6 _ r. O « ✓ V POOL • F r. r V L + U ° 4 C r Iy a � �10 Iq > ✓✓ 4 r P q .r., y q 4 S J �. ° 1 •a c r.L TNT q ✓oc ccly "C N � e�m�ro! °6 r V N O c`. •��V Y_ nb n L O °r L V O• ✓ L G" = q + d y o N C C✓ ��« G > b u a 0 «7 dC Cb .^rjpygVL�r � °d « ° '.rV .N..er Pp .. J a q✓ G z°, y c o OrC Tt y q VSy r+ 6C u yV��{ Oy�� Py L•qr _ °E C ✓OT.a. q.ric it wZgN y0 brr «r^�L. Vq ✓�P riir O O •- f P q � 1 'L'q�:." E _ ._✓ ^gin ✓race _ c« <Orp :r „tom cc y a FN L• M G C p r V L C 1 8 w V q r G o q v c o q V ° a 1= b L co A� V i oY V o +qa ry V L 0 N m I I • `�, I ! ! -o'- L C O B t TO_S O p ✓ u _ u L S✓ y« G 6 _ r. O « ✓ V POOL • F r. r V L + U ° 4 C r Iy a � �10 Iq > ✓✓ 4 r P q .r., y q 4 S J �. ° 1 •a c r.L TNT q ✓oc ccly "C N � e�m�ro! °6 r V N O c`. •��V Y_ nb n L O °r L V O• ✓ L G" = q + d y o N C C✓ ��« G > b u a 0 «7 dC Cb .^rjpygVL�r � °d « ° '.rV .N..er Pp .. J a q✓ G z°, y c o OrC Tt y q VSy r+ 6C u yV��{ Oy�� Py L•qr _ °E C ✓OT.a. q.ric it wZgN y0 brr «r^�L. Vq ✓�P riir O O •- f P q � 1 'L'q�:." E _ ._✓ ^gin ✓race _ c« <Orp :r „tom cc y a FN L• M G C p r V L C 1 8 w V q r G o q v c o q V ° a 1= b L co A� V i oY V o +qa ry V L 0 N m I I • `�, -o'- L C O B t TO_S O p ✓ u _ u L S✓ y« G 6 _ r. O « ✓ V POOL • F r. r V L + U ° 4 C r Iy a � �10 Iq > ✓✓ 4 r P q .r., y q 4 S J �. ° 1 •a c r.L TNT q ✓oc ccly "C N � e�m�ro! °6 r V N O c`. •��V Y_ nb n L O °r L V O• ✓ L G" = q + d y o N C C✓ ��« G > b u a 0 «7 dC Cb .^rjpygVL�r � °d « ° '.rV .N..er Pp .. J a q✓ G z°, y c o OrC Tt y q VSy r+ 6C u yV��{ Oy�� Py L•qr _ °E C ✓OT.a. q.ric it wZgN y0 brr «r^�L. Vq ✓�P riir O O •- f P q � 1 'L'q�:." E _ ._✓ ^gin ✓race _ c« <Orp :r „tom cc y a FN L• M G C p r V L C 1 8 w V q r G o q v c o q V ° a 1= b L co A� V i oY V o +qa ry V L 0 N m I I • `�, L O °r L V O• ✓ L G" = q + d y o N C C✓ ��« G > b u a 0 «7 dC Cb .^rjpygVL�r � °d « ° '.rV .N..er Pp .. J a q✓ G z°, y c o OrC Tt y q VSy r+ 6C u yV��{ Oy�� Py L•qr _ °E C ✓OT.a. q.ric it wZgN y0 brr «r^�L. Vq ✓�P riir O O •- f P q � 1 'L'q�:." E _ ._✓ ^gin ✓race _ c« <Orp :r „tom cc y a FN L• M G C p r V L C 1 8 w V q r G o q v c o q V ° a 1= b L co A� V i oY V o +qa ry V L 0 N m I I • `�, - T r �•V V C r V C i � P � • 2 �' q _r 0 4 �� C 2 c_on a i V pr O V q C a P .L.cM O C V- V P V L ar r y i Os O- G =L r Or �� POC .L.• I � 1 n= TZ ` F .i •� aL0 -yc ` -bC YC•N rpyO.e q0 .U•� V L qN a a o V VJ ^29 rpr U.r.• 7V'YO rr 2 I I + r O l V V C C y 4l M l l p 2 �• � U r O .Cp.♦ L� q O E y I 6'' N •J b w �OraN -L.n ` i C I �O �r Pte= q Ana. P d°q Ti r - V D q r C L "� r gG�rcM1 _° J = Y P rGa 19 V V L M �p r V L L L d 9 O _ -- i V w E�`d$ Lc G.Ge DV Lv�C --,2= �o° C ` _ � OCSi L C r C G S .pig q r - _ G OLq dD Vq i°aO r �OV -Nr �p Cq • VrOI N_qp Lr tSr�r3 6 -PV iC `v �- C �YLy •rqv QVfOD r♦p u G Q y v q V♦ V pi ^Oq0 a V •L a S O . 0. OVq•. lL. Vr P6C O L �^ o� � P' r p r N q C J q c Q v1 = q O N - T r C C V O gU 3O O • 2 �' q _r 0 4 �� C 2 � - O • On V pr q O rV j �4N -q - -o - — O C V- V P V L =Eo i TO j =L �r'O Or �� POC .L.• I � 1 n= TZ ` aL0 -yc ` -bC YC•N rpyO.e q0 .U•� V L qN U4VP- V VJ ^29 rpr U.r.• 7V'YO rr 2 I I + r O l V V C C y 4l M l l p 2 �• � U r O .Cp.♦ L� q O E y I 6'' N •J b w �OraN -L.n a6r Lyy I �O �r Pte= C�L. r.0 yn Ti r - V _ °_ C $I "� �ngcT -`moo _o gG�rcM1 _° J = rGa 19 V V L M �p r V L L L d 9 O _ -- i V w E�`d$ oL:• V court .'i --,2= �o° C ` _ q?% C r C G S .pig q r - _ G OLq dD Vq i°aO r �OV -Nr �p • VrOI =a NO tSr�r3 6 -PV iC �- C �YLy •rqv QVfOD r♦p q y y V♦ V pi ^Oq0 a V V'y V r q >Sa c ° Q > b p u L O u b 6� 6 roc ° O E♦ a C O L r F�oD Coq d- > nc q T O N c•o- a C_ i �r r•� O O •n V v G T rr V Lr a♦n ' C 6 L N VJ. v G o ccE C = V C V V W 1r v -- p- '+ q o dov =� N O N =.w M1• a V q L\ V" CY l r J d EPd •C LCr Vr V N O V Lq —.a9 J � q q � -4 q r r V O E y V T 4 V 3O O • 2 �' q _r 0 4 �� C 2 � - O • V - -o - — = =Eo i j L =' E �• I � 1 n= ` VJ ^29 rpr U.r.• 7V'YO rr 2 I I + r O l V v 4` L .n .f q V •j L V -q. 4. V d q v GC I 6'' �OraN -L.n vPC•r Lyy I rPN Ti r - V _ °_ C $I "� �ngcT -`moo _o gG�rcM1 >— = rGa V --,2= C ` _ C r C G S .pig q r - _ G O2Gr�VLVL 6 �- C �YLy V♦ V pi ^Oq0 •L a S O . 0. G G d L Na 1... r V'y V r q >Sa c ° Q > b p u L O u b 6� 6 roc ° O E♦ a C O L r F�oD Coq d- > nc q T O N c•o- a C_ i �r r•� O O •n V v G T rr V Lr a♦n ' C 6 L N VJ. v G o ccE C = V C V V W 1r v -- p- '+ q o dov =� N O N =.w M1• a V q L\ V" CY l r J d EPd •C LCr Vr V N O V Lq —.a9 J � q q � -4 q r r V O E y V -• Gr v ^ cq_A —moo or .° q � 6u "i Vet - S -• u Cr V♦` C� V 4 L 3 v c i N q r. V • � - L u O nC L�r NV Y V —L ° q � 4G c ce• ♦ r V O V O �rrrV 4y V V^ u L V V U L L a 7J V p T a V O c G r d A U V N c° U c o' L L C L b. L ` ^ L N O p c—. - Y 4 - � V N - � N •p u— L n r i N O 9 _p N .v q o o C � oa c V � v v° p C C 2 av J q L O ^ s 9 y Pr ^ C = ` -T G � q O '= G e L 2 4_ V r O =� Q J O y C — 7 O U � Ta a L n'4 a L L V O F U 4 n L .c y° r Y 4 � r G = V _v E v V U_ 4 � _ r/• L � r V q r J ? q .f•. L PL y• � 9 C - C C V V V N� N V+ f I Vii' V G L u p C a u q� v — 7 � e Y � p —_ :3 O 1 V O MO V r p u n _7 O C G7 a •. pS r �• V � en T 3O O • 2 i j L =' E �• I � 1 n= ` VJ 7 2 I I + r l .Tr I C r L• I O a G G d L Na = q O N I J I q 2 '• r u b L •• � O a 4 < a a All -• Gr v ^ cq_A —moo or .° q � 6u "i Vet - S -• u Cr V♦` C� V 4 L 3 v c i N q r. V • � - L u O nC L�r NV Y V —L ° q � 4G c ce• ♦ r V O V O �rrrV 4y V V^ u L V V U L L a 7J V p T a V O c G r d A U V N c° U c o' L L C L b. L ` ^ L N O p c—. - Y 4 - � V N - � N •p u— L n r i N O 9 _p N .v q o o C � oa c V � v v° p C C 2 av J q L O ^ s 9 y Pr ^ C = ` -T G � q O '= G e L 2 4_ V r O =� Q J O y C — 7 O U � Ta a L n'4 a L L V O F U 4 n L .c y° r Y 4 � r G = V _v E v V U_ 4 � _ r/• L � r V q r J ? q .f•. L PL y• � 9 C - C C V V V N� N V+ f I Vii' V G L u p C a u q� v — 7 � e Y � p —_ :3 O 1 V O MO V r p u n _7 O C G7 a •. pS r �• V � en a 8� O L Y 4.� C r F u C 6 iu ` O I- r y a a 9 V ° d a r N O 2 f ° V ✓ o N Y •' F q P O ° d gin b ?a YDL, O ` V NrV. C • =�� Yu 2d pa ` O °er y C C =r i p N ar 6l ` VI q ^ „Oq � � O Zz Nc YL O L C 7 { � V`O GrQO n w m w ! z Y N, �i N r 4 y 9 = Y d d Q L C V O I = w G I 2 D V Y O Y l L✓ O - i f l 9 Y �' _ -- C 1 � �0 t4 M1Y � w= ✓U °N � � 9= l ° \” V� Ob = °�� 2 qV d` q.4 ` t I Pi N ]!V u V ✓ O V C Y L` yN L T r q V O n O-r C •-• �- O q r V u � q C• C ° V D .- d - L � u ° d 9 �� �� ° i ° Y u I D O �� D q� � i .. ° V ✓ C O V i 2 W � �� E 4 v ° L i y n w ✓O V r q r r � ` aY > ✓_'° c` eI- `✓ oy -° ° � tea.. >w uc °" P c.Y I V b _✓ -� N � V .Li U G .Vn { °� O -� w l -- O ^ L .rni - N r � G i O P q � ._ v niN °y "^ nY rcc o_ .°.m _'_ o .°..� g a.°- "•L„ y° C NCO Uw C V I'n NC I�� °n ^ .-✓ Cr y Iz 1 nL. `. V ° •- .Oi L .✓i d_ 1 _ d V I L T u v` u j r P - V w I ' I e <. L 0 u r 7 � Q� � � I L ^I L d O 6 •[ r 4 d N ° L �9 Y °•V X q V Ur VVO� ° .Ti =Nyr V 9 o r" 111 � ILr G d N - d ^ y G a d° p IOC ( � � � i ° t L r d •• ° _Y Y y Y a O �. O q O° C O d to G1 y y C �.1. �� ` = +i N w P O✓ N M C• F � q �� ••`i V'L rv;.I Y �p[°O GV. =C 6G 0- O DW VJ a d w O Yv E T "� {•eW n s�be 1- «c °N Q V G- r N •° ti O O� C r F i iu r y � V d q P O ° d gin b ?a YDL, O ` V NrV. • =�� Yu 2d pa ` O °er w Np i LL v= ✓° Zz Nc n w m w ! z N, �i N r 4 y 9 = Y d d Q L C V O I = w G I 2 D V Y O Y l L✓ O - i f l 9 Y �' _ -- C 1 � �0 t4 M1Y � w= ✓U °N � � 9= l ° \” V� Ob = °�� 2 qV d` q.4 ` t I Pi N ]!V u V ✓ O V C Y L` yN L T r q V O n O-r C •-• �- O q r V u � q C• C ° V D .- d - L � u ° d 9 �� �� ° i ° Y u I D O �� D q� � i .. ° V ✓ C O V i 2 W � �� E 4 v ° L i y n w ✓O V r q r r � ` aY > ✓_'° c` eI- `✓ oy -° ° � tea.. >w uc °" P c.Y I V b _✓ -� N � V .Li U G .Vn { °� O -� w l -- O ^ L .rni - N r � G i O P q � ._ v niN °y "^ nY rcc o_ .°.m _'_ o .°..� g a.°- "•L„ y° C NCO Uw C V I'n NC I�� °n ^ .-✓ Cr y Iz 1 nL. `. V ° •- .Oi L .✓i d_ 1 _ d V I L T u v` u j r P - V w I ' I e <. L 0 u r 7 � Q� � � I L ^I L d O 6 •[ r 4 d N ° L �9 Y °•V X q V Ur VVO� ° .Ti =Nyr V 9 o r" 111 � ILr G d N - d ^ y G a d° p IOC ( � � � i ° t L r d •• ° _Y Y y Y a O �. O q O° C O d to G1 y y C �.1. �� ` = +i N w P O✓ N M C• F � q �� ••`i V'L rv;.I Y �p[°O GV. =C 6G 0- O DW VJ a d w O Yv E T "� {•eW n s�be 1- «c °N Q V G- r N •° ti O O� 3: 'x Ln 9 9 u c c _ --v_ i o ciO I O w C _ O M d p -ago' d c r �� d .L.. � •�G i I .'r. F� � r d � � q T �Z =Z! Z ;- �•.T. -J r._p y V y- O V ne � Al,