No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984/01/11 - Agenda Packet4" `7`> ,y. `5 ,: �r k, a, i. ., ; ,. vl ...•. ��..�. ryt ' �_ _ '�:_,_ :. },. ,O �'. �:. A QTY OF RANCHO CUCALIONGA, rr � �ss77 yy L LCy11�T� il�T C��Y�.Vi1SSlONT AGEENDA Regular Meeting WEDNESDAY January 11, 1984 7:00 P-M. IdONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9161 BASE LINE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA L Pledge of Allegiance IL P..• I Call Commissioner Barker_ Commissioner Juarez Commissioner McNiel III. Announcernents IV. Consent Calendar Commissioner Rempel Commissioner Stout The following Consent Calendar items are expacted to he routine and non - controversial. They will be acted on by the Commissian at one time without discussion. If anyone has concern over any item, it should be removed for discussion. A. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A NEW ARCHITECTURAL PRO1: UCT TYPE FOR TRACT 12414 - A -IM COMPANY - Ninety -two detached single amity units located on the south side of ;Mignonette Avenue, west of Beryl - APN 202 - 032 -71. B. TENTATIVE TRACT 12237 - WOODLAND PACIFIC - Reappucation for design review of 20 single family homes or. 55.95 acres of land in the Very Low Residential district located on tie east side of Hermosa, north of Hillside_ C. TIME EXTENSION FOR CONi?lTIO*;AL USE PERIMIT 82 -12 - LEDERyIANN - The development of sn 11,311 square foot prescnool facility or., 2.98 acres of land in the ie)w Resider:aai district located at tre northeast corner of Church Street and Turner Avenue - APN 1077• - 271 -08. Planning Commission Agenda -2- .lanuary 11, 1984 A V. Public Hearings The follc19ing items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice their opinion of the re ?uted project. PIease wait to be recognized by the Chairman and address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes par individual for each project. D. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12433 - K be B - The development of 450 singly family manufactured homes on 45 acres of land within the Victoria Community Plan, designated Medium and Mediun -High Residential, located at the northeast corner of Base Lire Road and Milliken Avenue - A portion of APN 227 - -081 -06. (Continued from 12 -14 -83 meeting.) E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 83 -08 TENTATIVE TRACT 12525 - TRUAX - A change in zone from Medium Density Residential 8 -14 du/ac) to Low ,Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) for a total development and subdivision of 16.5 acres into i23 loss, comprising 122 zero lot line units generally located on the south side of arrow Highway, between Turner Avenue, and Center Avenue - APN 209 - 091 -10. F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -23 - UNGER - A request for a fatness center to be located at 9507 Arrow Highway, Suite H, within the Cucamonga Business Park located on the southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald (Subarea 3 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan. C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -21 - EN AGAPE - Proposed 1530 sq. ft. addition to a? ° ^.d ` e offiG-8.4 iind C1i- aSr—c— M f^ an e-dsting church located at 9101 19th Street - APN 202 - 041 -41. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8250 - LAON CORPORATJON - A division of 9.65 acres into 5 parcels of land within Subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific Plan located on the east side of Haven Avenue, southside of Civ:e Center Drive - APN 208 -35-03 and 11. Related Item - DR 83 -33 (Item IN") Planning Co.nmission Agenda -3- January 11, 1984 I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8280 - II3TERMETRO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION - A division of 8.82 acres into 2 parcels within the Industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3) located on the south side o: Arrow Highway, betweer. Heilman and helms - APN 209 - 022 -01, 02, 03, and 04. Related Item - DR 83 -34 (Item "O ") d. REVISIONS TV iIZNTATlVT T R2kCTS 12354 AND 12364 -1 - LEIVIS HOMES - Located on the south side of Base Line, east o Deer Creek ChanneL A change of design from 71 lots to 72 lots for single family detached homes. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT l.11llL A IVIMi`7 it SMIN L a'i-tll - L'lil a'neRGtllerl LU Ult: 1ia11U11U Cucamonga Development Code, Title 17 of the Municipal Code, amending Section 17.08.040 -B and 17.09.040 -C to require a Conditional Use Permit for single family detached dwellings less than 906 sq. ft. L. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10035 - R.H. A.SSOCiATES - A residential subdivision of 15.7 acres of iand into 38 custom lots located south and east of riedhill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207- 101 -37 & 207 - 092 -10. (Continued from 9 -14 -83 meeting.) VII. New Bz mess M. N. RSVlh;'V b3 -33 - bALTEK - Tne development oI a 34,:74 sq. ft. commercial complex on 3.3 acres of land in the C -2 (Commercial) zone, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard. REVIEW 83 -35 - REITER - The development of a 5,625 sq. tt. office building on 112 acre of land ir. the General Industrial category (Subarea 3) to be located on the southwest corner of Archibald and Arrow - APN 209 - 021 -30. Planning Commission Agenda -4- January 11, 1984 ft fl, O. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -34 - ;NTERMETRO -The development of 8 29,790 sq. ft. indMlrial building addition on 8.82 acres of land in the General industrial category (Subarea 3), located on the south side of Arrow Route between Hellman Avenue and Helms Avenue - APN 209 - 022 -01. P. APPEAL OF PARCE:. MAP 5051 - TRAILS - An appeal concerning bridle trail locations Within '9 Subdivision of 3 lots located on the north side of Manzanita Drive, east of Vineyard Avenue. Q. PROGRAM TO REVISE HOUSLTG ELEMENT R. CIVIC CENTER COMiMTTEE SELECTION - Oral Report by Jack Lam, Community Development Director S. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE - Oral Report by Rick Gomez, City Planner UL Public Comments This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already arpear on this agenda. X. Adjournment The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an All p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Commission. T ONTARIO IR1[RRaTIO&AL AIXVORT Crrlor RANCHO CUCAMONGA El r1 L'J CITY OF RANI Cxo CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 12237 -1 - WOODLAND PACIFIC - Reapplication for Design Review of 0 single family homes on 55.95 acres of land in the Very low residential district located on the east side of Hermosa, north of Hillside. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: _ Approval of elevations, plot plan, and gra ing plan. B. Purpose Construction of 20 single family dwellings. C. Location: East side of Hermosa, north of Hillside. D. Parcel Size: 55.95 acres. E. Existing Zoning: Very low residential. F. Existinq Land Use: Eucalyptus grove. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Eucalyptus grove; very low residential South - Egg ranch; very low residential East - Vacant; very low residential West - Eucalyptus grove; very low residenLia' H. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Proposed park North - Proposed park South - Very low residential East - Very low residential West - Proposed park I. Site Characteristics: The site slopes to the south at approximately a K grade and contains several small drainage swells. The area proposed for construction is covered with a Eucalyptus grove and does not contain any structures. ITEM B a PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA January 11, 1984 Tentative Tract 12237 -1 Page 2 II. ANALY`_;IS: A. General: This project is a portion of Tentative Tract 12237 which was approved on January 12, 1983. The original approval included 85 lots on approximately 5E acres; however, the applicant is requesting specific approval for designs on 20 lots within the southerly portion of this tract. The elevations have been designed with a variety of exterior treatments, as shown in Exhibit "C ". B. Desian Review Committee: The Committee recommended approval subject to the following: 1. The roof tile should be a subdued color (e.g., brown, or slate) consistent with the woodland area. 2. The grading should be designed to reserve trees per the original conditions of approval through specialized grading techniques. The applicant has incorporated these changes into the project as shown on the attached exhibits. C. Grading Committee: Tie Grading Committee reviewed the conceptual grading plan with the intent of minimizing grading to preserve trees whe:,ever possible. Based upon their review, the Grading Committee approved the conceptual grading plan subject tc driveway grades not exceeding IN except in extreme cases where the grade may be 10% to 120M maximum. IIi. RECOMMENDATION: It is consider all material Commission concurs with recommendations, approval plan would be in order. Res4ct foul ly,,Imbmi tted, recommended that the Planning Commission and elements of this project. If the the Design Review and Grading Committee of the elevations, plot plan, and grading PICK GOM_ City Planner RG /DC /kep Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site /Grading Plan Exhibit "C" - Elevations Original Conditions of Approval 11 4) E El CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA PLANNING DIVISION ITE 1: �� u t/ 7 TITLE: LOaAwt is w MA EXHIBIT- A SCALE= �� FORTH i1 f i 1 :t r1 1 CITY OF R.AuNCM CUCANMON -GA PLAIT ENC DIN IAN r .l i 7 _ ITEM: � �•I� -rr�s, 1 c. v w f TITLE: ��lesprADIN� EXHIBIT: SCALE: a' FORTH 11 1-1 n I i , J.IO,� uiO OIL W U i� i II 1� i Rail < w �a 9 a • -F �a �a a � V, a d 9 ' xZvi�L j? f. s. z. I Q: a� }ag 7 i a ■ 3 i EE S ... icsic 's ics \ .,•g 3 i .� —wry!- � 38la33 j •■ �iTT A2 22 3e®ee0e6 �t tr. B FB a I ?Q F y I B B "! B � IC;161t ,r 11 v Mcw7w��'OJL I _7 It. I- fit s Offil IL urw 1-k �F 6� d� 5 �� N1 k r. . r. ' � P iJ + iiii: a�kzi c� `"yy1� ei .w , eeeee ai � � x ' � e J I, e sie 1`e �e- e i A :. a F !0 ??� Al s Offil IL urw 1-k �F 6� d� 5 �� N1 k r. . r. ' � P iJ + iiii: a�kzi c� `"yy1� ei .w , eeeee ai � � x ' � e J I, e sie 1`e �e- e i fa - .�: � •, .. ..> '. _ yl it :1:.. ';.J.J 1. �I. . qj L F r } c 1�� j 1 ■fit' ��u 11 fa - .�: � •, .. ..> '. _ yl it :1:.. ';.J.J 1. �I. . qj Lm Ll- N/Z-i40.Ri. ZI .�_WnO A �M metal �1YaaWaA� 1J a _I i T i I f i la � � I I�I II g I La � 3V �La � Lill fir x= Oi ky f / 1 ££I f \� E E7 if ! = Yii�i� ii is _PtsS�sgi �{ a a a� fs Ly E E7 ii X i � I i li i! � I F I ED, F:i it II! j-C I .MI ""N=�io ur. s t H NOUTAX'M Ou tMA ^' i Air it Y �e n1 3 pp If Y. p22 29a�C 2, 3i Is` Fj z� a X10 � J 36 t `c a iI f II � I��II • f: 3 I� F Z Q ••. g v � TdOtfi�A w i� i� F rma �ss�ss kikika �i3tli! IB kBl3BB91jB �Q II • 6� nil a i i` z= $ IL. . i5i i i �a Ya � � Y I I C i 'I ■ 'L:LLT. ^e r:: ;.: UZ H NO1irA3 II OCi mvw ago 2• a a I I L iMz 3K I i2 Ii I, 1p j — F I I •_ I I II I I'. I I El ul C' i ■ I a =_ zs:ss� �� •I ii vkkit kk �lliiiS �i , I z 3aeeeees'_: No \ i El ul C' I I 2 S' El ul C' �•' I 4 L •..a I y lifa�! •: �aasip j . t Id 1"a a, I n l ■fa:'.I A / — O ! 5 I*u w L+.�F I © 1 �. .o I 4. f k Sm _• H _— qr.I' t 1 �yl r. O L I 1 �yl r. O L �3 ■1 OK � a Le i F I--g1 T" i� la3 Ei .y -z Y if7w i �e nc L Li a -i (�g ssssss k4k;t ii m�1�EYc= �BBBEBBB I ! _I �3 ■1 OK � a Le i F I--g1 T" i� la3 Ei .y -z Y if7w i �e nc L Li a -i (�g ssssss k4k;t ii m�1�EYc= �BBBEBBB I 0 i El is i �Z®� y Woiivs3 [3 ; tit SQ w.�w w�.•w•..r.r I I� - -L -- 1 TS e EA I c g 2 s _ e = F a w i / Y - 3BBfiBBB6 =1 'erg -t -A • r- ��• — _ . L .f 3� I� e_ —a El Ul El old 3, c g 2 s _ e = F a w i / Y - 3BBfiBBB6 =1 'erg -t -A • r- ��• — _ . L .f 3� I� e_ —a El Ul El I 0 I�'C'3wi17 ' w�f[ :le'IB Q WARREF-ml 1 - W�l Aj i r� � III I !cI a -A r 100 1� r� I 4 L- ii� S -. Y 39EABAwA 7b Z>E i V� b O 11 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: — CITY OF RAINCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT January 11, 1984 Chairman and Members of th$ Planning Cummission Rick Gomez, City Planner /i1 Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner 1 FOR APPROVAL 0� A' NEW ARCFHTTECTURAL PRODUCT TYPE - 92 detached singe farai7y— of Mignonette Avenue, west IV) Z Ia 1977 I rum i"ui 1L hlY - units located on of Beryl. BACKGROUND: The A -M Company is requesting a change in product type for a previously approved single family tract located on the south side of Mignonette Avenue, west of Beryl Street. The Design Review Committee has determined that the new architectural product adequately conforms to the basic design standards of the City and recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION: The Design Review Committee found that the new arch itectura product for Tract 12414 will be compatible with surrounding land uses and recommends approval. Respectfully submitted, Rick Gomez City Planner RG:FD:Jr ITEM A 0 as Q o aL t { ' r O lute j 1 T ' ici « — i� j ' < I < l w t jY 10 Y as s. nH CITE' OF ITEM: _ RANCM Ct.TCAN10'N'GA TITLE = PLANNING DR'ISUN EXHIBIT =_ ■j � � aj S I � ..� ,� � i I13 � ' I Y' z, � " '1li �• +•, I I ! of } $1 ti � s' f 'f F sf I of p zi i I =j _ LL zi —I i � 1c S � �i tf � Ul a I 441 is a s; ai 2i p i zi is 1 1 at j G3 � ti 3y �J_` � sj =j at ai ai F aj CITY OF rrE.f= R 'NCIIO CUCANIONGA T1-LE: jai wR PLANNING DR190 -N EXtilBrr= L SCALE- L] C CITY OF RAINCHt7 CUCAMONGA. STAFF REPORT i DATE: January 1_1, 1964 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner 1„ SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR CUP 82 -12 - LEDERMAN - The development of an 11,311 square foot preschcol facility or. 2. °8 acres of -and in the L District (2 -4 du /acre), located at the northeast corner of Church Street and Turner Avenue - APN 1077- 271 -08. I. BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a time extension for a preschool facility to be located at the northeast corner of Church Street and Turner Avenue. The proposed building will have 6 classrooms designed to handle a maximum of 220 students. The 60- stall parking lot is designed with a dropoff point in front of the ;wilding and has a continuous sidewalk from the street to the entrance. II. ANALYSIS: A review of the project indicated that the site plan and building design are ccnsistent with the new Development Code and all other applicable City standards and ordinances. A letter from the applicant requesting a time extension states that currently the owner plans to begin construction of the project in the spring of 1984. The project was approved on August 11, 1982, with an expiration date of February 11, 1984. The Development Code permits applications for CUPS to be valid for a total of 4 years from the original date of the approval with maximum twelve (12) menth extensions. A copy of the original staff report, resolution of approval with conditions, and Planning Commission minutes of the August 11, 1982 meeting are attached for your review. 17 EM C PLANNING COMMISSION January 11, 1984 Time Extension for Page 2 AGENDA CUP 82 -12 III. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that a twelve (12) month extension be granted for this project. The new expiration date would be February 11, 1985. RespE4f-! id�ly s ni tted, RICK GOMEZ City PlIannar RS /CJ /kep )ttachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit 9" - Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Building Elevations Exhibit "D" - Flcor Plan August 11, 1982 Staff Report Resolution of Approval with Conditions August 11, 1982 Planning Commission Minutes Letter from applicant requesting extension Time Extension Resolution, of Approval E 11 E. El sl a C T-7' i it- Lai 1 ,t N'Or ary ni- ITi._ \I: RA- NCI —i® CLC1MONG A TITLE: PLANNING Dl \'L:U\ EXHIBM _�- SG1L.E: STS. s WACLJ— 6 �Ot Aft x cz p� 9 -� q ;* CITY OF RANCHO CLC -VXIO G-� PLC %\NI \G DIVISION u a D D*>t w El�1- Pvc7 -t:- r i 2- L-CT VL 'Sf L F..wAx i 6 Ll �" 'r `s • : . sa+ NORTH TITLE- EXHIBIT: " cGiLE: Ll 11 E ;up Urw CITY OF RANCHO CL;C:- k';\,YO \GA PL.A. I \G DIN71SLNN ITEM= C- -P- SL - +L) TITLE:, *j-WA-n4j AS _ EXHIBIT - ^G :: _ozCaLE: HZE -5,— Lsr T 1 ap Z WN A.1 --ITT ~ t '�— fid.YM;f �•JS `� is,1i iJe'i�fMW 7. =- rrs�o�s CITY OF RANCHO CUCACMO\G, -,� PLANNING DIVOO\ ITF-M- 'G ° �. u. p 8Z -1 TITLE= ELe%Wrtg=piS Z�SEG7�crtS EXHIBIT scki -STS LHe=-T zj--F� C- n 0 �J 0 61 7—El RI!C �{yi t,: WiW ^Y� Fzj� CITY OF RANCHO CL;CAXIONG PUMNINI`G DIVISION �a wi I amom f �fi TITLE= F(ccr— r"ls+N EXHIMT =_Ul SCALE: = Q.T.S. EA CITY Or RANCHO CUCA.MONGA STAFF REPORT 29 DATE: August 11, 1982 TO: Members of the Planning Commissi:n FR0,4: Rick Gomez, City Planner SY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -12 - LEDERMANN - The development of an 11,311 square foot presr_h facility on 2.98 acres of land in the A -1 zone (Limited Agriculture) located at the northeast corner of Church Street and Turner Avenue - APN 1077 - 271 -08. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The Applicants, Ledermann Architects, are requesting review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop a preschool on 2.98 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Turner Avenue and Church Street (Exhibit "A "). The project site is currently vacant with the exception of trees, including a number of Palms at the street corner and Eucalyptus trees along the north property line (Exhibit "S "). The site slopes approximately 2`: to the southeast. North of the property, a 6 foot high 2:1 slope was cr; '.ed when the adjacent tract homes were developed. Zoning for the subject property is A -1 (Limited Agriculture). R -1 zoning with single family residential tracts surrounds the property to the north, south, and west. Land to the east is zoned A -1 where a single family house on a 3.78 acre parcel is set back 16 feet from the subject property, near the southeast corner of the future parking lot. The proposed preschool facility will include a six classroom, 11,311 square foot building, 60 parking spaces, and an asphalt playground area with active play equipment (Exhibit "C "). A decorative six foot wall constructed of slump block and wrought iron is planned for the west boundary of the playground. Along the north and east oropert; lines, a six foot high concrete block wall will be provided and will necessitate the removal of the existing trees. These trees will be replaced as per the conceptual landscape plan. The design of the preschool building is shown on Exhibit "E ". Colored elevations of the proposed structure and a site plan will be available for your review at the public hearing. • ITEM 5 \I Cl Conditional Use Permit 82- 12/Ledermann Planning Ca^^issior, agenda August 11, 1932 Page 2 ANALYSIS: The project has been reviewed by the Development Peview Com- mittee and Grading_ Committee and has undergone the appropriate revisions. Together with the recommended Conditions of Approval, the project is con- sistent with current development standards of the City of Rancho Cicamonga. Ar, area of concern relative to this project was the consideration for a retaining wail along the north property line. Currently the 6 foot slope north of the suoject property is relatively unusabie, unmaintained, and provides an unsightly condition. If the required block wall on the north property line had retaining capabilities up to 6 feet, the rear yards of the homes could be leveled off. However, because of signifi- cant Problems associated with coordinating any improvements with the adjacent residential property owners, liability of the preschool appli -. cant, drainage problems, and the cost of constructing a retaining wall of this length and height, a retaining wail was not included as a Condi- tion of Approval. DESIGN REV!;-:II: The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project with three conditions. The Committee was satisfied with the architecture, but expressed concern with the exterior buildirg materials. They suggested that material changes as specified in special condition number one k'.) be used to unify the design of each building elevation. In addition, the Committee felt the office entrance was unpronounced and recommended that a canopy or overhead trellis be constructed in front of the doorway. The third Committee recommendation kas that a number of the existing Palm trees be replanted to presarvE some of the original character of this site. ENVIRONMENTAL P,EVIEW: Part I of the Initial Study, as completed by the Applicant, is provided for your review and consideration. Staff has completed Part II of the Environmental Assessment and found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of this project. If the Commission concurs with such findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be in order. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The use, as well as the proposed building design and site pld,:. is in accordance with the objectives of the General Plan and Zoning Ordirance. In addition, the use together with the conditions recommended herein will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare of the public or properties in the immediate vicinity. �7 Conditional Use Permit 82- 12 /Ledermann Planning Commission, Agenda August 11, 1982 Page 3 RECTIMENDATIOI : It is a!! m put and elements t1Q Cvn'vn:ssjon can surf tions of Approval, the appropriate. recommended that the Planning Commission consider of this project. If, after such consideration., fort the facts for finding and recommended Condi- adoption of the attached Resolution would be Resuktfully submitted, CK GOMEZ ty Planner Cj:jr Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Part I, Resolut Location Flap Natural Features flap "C" - Illustrative Site Plan "D" - Architectural Elevations (2 Sheets) "E" - Floor P13n "F" - Details Initial Studv ion with Conditions El 11 W RESOLUTION NO. 82 -77 A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 82 -12 FOR CHILDREN'S WORLD PRESCHOOL LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TURNER. AVENUE AP'D CHURCH STREET IN THE A -i ZONE WHEREAS, on the 4th day of June, 1982, a complete application was filed by I--dermann Architects for review of the above - described project; and 1.1HEREAS, on the 11th day of August, 1982, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission reld a public hearing to consider the above- described project_. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the cc. ',ions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. SECTION 2: That this project :viil not create adverse ;mpacts on the environment and that a Neo_ative Declaraticn is issue:: on August 11, 1982. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 82 -12 is approved subject to the folloun ng conditions: PLANNING OIVISI-1 1. The exterior materials used on the orcoosed buildinq must be consistent on all elevations to unify the buildina design. As per Design Review Committee recommendations, the lower portions of all elevations must be stucco below the horizontal fascia board. Wood siding must be used above the horizontal trim on all sides. The final revisions must be submitted Resoiut:on No. 2i7 Page 2 to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits_ 2- The office entryway on the south elevation must be Provided with an overhead canopy or trellis structure as cer Design Review Committee recom- mendations. retails of this structure must be submitted to znd approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of buildinq permits. 3- Some eViStTng pzjm trees w:t :'yin the right -o` -way at the southwest corner of the site must be saved and replanted at or near the southwest corner of the project. Details of the exact number of trees to be saved and replanted must be submitted with the master plan of existinq trees required as per standard condition number C2. 4. The 6' high block wall on the north side of the Playground must be located on the grooerty line. The existing Lucalyptus trees may be removed if replaced by another species of eucalyptus. De- tails must be shown on the detailed landscaping and irrigation Plans suuc+itted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The block wall at the southeast corner of the parking lot shall step down in height so that the view of cars exiting the Parking lot is not obstructed. Within 25' of the Church Street property lire the .^aximum height shall be 4'. ENGINEERING DIVISICN 6. The intersection of Church Street and Turner Avenue shall be reconstructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The existing storm drain on -turner Av_i,ue shall be extended easterly to the pro, catch basin. The proposed catch basin s;,ill be designed as a curb openi,ig type par city standards. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1982. PLANNING COMr1lSSTON OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 11 11 r1 LJ 2 E 11 I. JACK LAi'. Secretary of the Planning Co- zission of the Cite of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission hald on the 11 *_h day cf August, 1582, by the following vote- to -wit: AYES: COI. VISSIONERS NOES: CO'NlSS1O ,ER5 ABSENT: COMMISSIMERS Re ^gel, Barker, "cidiel, Stout, Kino None None O O V 0 c 0 O � d � d G M L G L 94 -_ G G- q\ G 6 G C C q 6 w - C w ` � j L r r u - - C � L u '.1 t t " "� q u ` q 4 4 u •4. - l � L C - q w J l �> - - C G N L C r _ L r r✓ q q P_ - q S w _ C J • C _ S O S O Y G C _ C d S O T O O J ~ Q .'f � � V Y J T V _ C' _ v . L _]O O O� .Ti v C u q _� a• . . L q _ _ C q _ L C• .-ter M M q c p E.da . 5d � • •�� - �q c eLL E C O C _ v _ f V C C ✓ ✓r_ I I4a 2' YLG. c a a w w¢ E L__72 c - -C ^ ^J °OL L . O . ..• . .Y-. C L c+ w w L _ r G= O C c a 2 Y C c- 9 9 2- ..c.�Z 2 e.Vy' cai c �L = cv = =� __• u' iL °v •'•Kc � = .°.0 ° °° �q V V O� �n C' a•O qn r..0 .'C c ccL C C.�� V V CST q ql PC E O_ G 7 U 9 q I P q I G� N NL G _ _ u u -•"O .wV G GG � �yG. n - -�,. _r0 � �I G G G2 vC-C N _ I 0 � - - - u �L - U b n _ +• D q - - - U b u u n r_ + D q z =2 _ _- o.. L° . co a s saw o ._ V c -• r "i � c O al O O_ r 7 a J a ^ _' ` C C V " c O 1 1 \ \• - - ^ � 1 S J - o o Z o o u G - - n - v v 9 S T w w O n - G I 1_ � � _ _ � _• ° O O O C r C -` 9 _ _� O � � G q " " O _ I � � q �I 9 �! G -i• S '= L w w O J � O r r J S y r _ V O q � - _ � J � O VI � � O O _ -•>nG - =T r q T _ - -G - -�C. = rC - -rO<V q T.C.. r, 4 � r - J 1 11 � G J P _ M1. u U V .n _� C P r N �. d. J d~ P I y L_ •� `� G V V r C ' y O N C O � n G ✓I � _ L r O� • I 7+' �� C L O G <.�_ _ •^__• __G� ? ''• O_ C> - arc V _ _ _ V o _°_ — cca V z 7E ZZ C 7. Or v Z zi G r It— '27 4 LL m is O u � CL= r C ° V -J. ♦V� ` O =a V 1 99 n O C �� a D a V d -• . G J r 0 r C _V ` f � C- ` I I� i I V D - O_ y C e r O-r Tt LJ' r T 1 _ VV \A ou _ _ .n ?• t �f C .3Z2 Z-4 'I " •�•— o� • °° o- o ° u °,tea` g� _'� -.� Cr c _. -..4 V — j a' - ¢I 1 c I -• — c — C= P O � � ^ O .n = V J .R o.°. 2v- °_� r o.°. a5_ c�L_°.n Z:a I Y �•O __ vC _r hz zr C P 1 1 �� I \J ^ v V � - — N a•1 a. m s° r 4 ? L ... n = C - C v 7 o� C i ^_ C _ r q _rte b E 7 ° 7 G �y ` L G u c " o c } t U � C J _ G O � V .+ O C . i] ;y r�� 2 C _y> i C Y J v +7� Y a dt{ " J _ n� 7 f . O r n O� � a i 1 i I ' I I I I . I i w i M1•v I 1 I Y 1 i .k Y 1 I � 1 1 vi li tl I a C 7 v I _ C w � G O M r p o a n I i x ' = 7 7 9 = U V L 7 � P L - � T, =3 0 r u O J O L � r Lc U J i C v r L c � _ L J s_ rl - ° 1 , _\ uu C T O i r C >. N L v 7 O V _U r _ _ � • � Ci_ _ _ S V _ _° n �.�� _� �� __ _ _M c— `j I I I -ter u•. °O� .__ u.. �'oo - otV zf LZC _��' .+ •nL4 rn� L. 1 _ wVL 4C�C 1 I( _ ' I C 0 s - 1 I L 4 p r v w r O L G N F o t � I o L W t _ r O a — c b r V a O h i w° V M9- n .` c C L S G ° I i s° r 4 ? L ... n = C - C v 7 o� C i ^_ C _ r q _rte b E 7 ° 7 G �y ` L G u c " o c } t U � C J _ G O � V .+ O C . i] ;y r�� 2 C _y> i C Y J v +7� Y a dt{ " J _ n� 7 f . O r n O� � a i 1 i I ' I I I I . I i w i M1•v I 1 I Y 1 i .k Y 1 I � 1 1 vi li tl I a C 7 v I _ C w � G O M r p o a n I i x ' = 7 7 9 = U V L 7 � P L - � T, =3 0 r u O J O L � r Lc U J i C v r L c � _ L J s_ rl - ° 1 , _\ uu C T O i r C >. N L v 7 O V _U r _ _ � • � Ci_ _ _ S V _ _° n �.�� _� �� __ _ _M c— `j I I I -ter u•. °O� .__ u.. �'oo - otV zf LZC _��' .+ •nL4 rn� L. 1 _ wVL 4C�C 1 I( _ ' I C 0 s I O � O ' o c � I o L W r O a — c h i s° r 4 ? L ... n = C - C v 7 o� C i ^_ C _ r q _rte b E 7 ° 7 G �y ` L G u c " o c } t U � C J _ G O � V .+ O C . i] ;y r�� 2 C _y> i C Y J v +7� Y a dt{ " J _ n� 7 f . O r n O� � a i 1 i I ' I I I I . I i w i M1•v I 1 I Y 1 i .k Y 1 I � 1 1 vi li tl I a C 7 v I _ C w � G O M r p o a n I i x ' = 7 7 9 = U V L 7 � P L - � T, =3 0 r u O J O L � r Lc U J i C v r L c � _ L J s_ rl - ° 1 , _\ uu C T O i r C >. N L v 7 O V _U r _ _ � • � Ci_ _ _ S V _ _° n �.�� _� �� __ _ _M c— `j I I I -ter u•. °O� .__ u.. �'oo - otV zf LZC _��' .+ •nL4 rn� L. 1 _ wVL 4C�C 1 I( _ ' I C 0 E } un Ty 4 C U r c 6 U r G_ u` f 9GCV �_ O r C L L C r O G ^r C� } un I } un �® PUBLIC HEARINGS E B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -12 - LEDEMM' "' - The development of an 11,311 square foot preschool facility on 2.93 _res of land in the A -1 zone (Limited Agriculture) located at the northeast corner of Church Street and Turner Avenue - APN 1077- 271 -08. Assistant Planner, Curt Johnston, reviewed the staff report. Chairman King asked how far to the south the wrought iron fence on the west side of the playgroud extended in relation to the proposed building. Mr. Johnston pointed to the proposed ending point and provided the Commission with an illustration of how the fence would look. Chairman Kina asked if there would be any supervision problems because of the fence. Mr. Johnston replied that there would not. Further, that in front of the fence there will be shrubbery and provided the Commission with a conceptual illustration of the landscaping. Commissioner Stout asked if it were true that on the northern edge of the project the grade is much higher than with the adjacent uses. Mr. Johnston replied that the proposeu project is eight feet lower than the adjacent lots. Ccmumissioner Stout asked if there was any thought given to the project so that you would be unable to see into the back yards adjacent to it. Mr. Johnston replied that when the project was first submitted staff felt that this was an unsightly problem. Furthers that the solution would be for the developer to build a retaining wall and on top of it a six -foot high rear yard fence would be built by the homeowners. However, because of the cost to the property owners, that solution was dropped. Commissioner Stout asked if the proposed landscaping would screen out the rear yards. Rick Gomez, City Planner, stated that this is a conceptual plan and screening of the rear yards will be taken care of at a later time. Mr. Johnston stated that the proposed landscaping to the south would be euca- lyptus with ground cover and shrubs. Chairman King opened the public hearing. Planning Commission Minutes -2- August 11, 1932 � 1 Mr. Ken Ledermann, architect anJ agent for the applicant, concurred with the staff report. He stated that the owner has two concerns, one dealing with the cost of removal of the existing palm trees as indicated in Section 3 Item 3 of the Resolution. The other concern is the idea of shade trees in the play- ground as expressed in Item 6 of the Resolution and their cost. Further c. -incern was expressed on the possibility of liability should children play in the trees and fall out of them. Mr. Ledermann indicated that shade structures would be installed which would lessen the exposure to liability. Mr. Ledermann indicated that the owners of the property intend to put in a standard wall of some kind. Commissioner Stout stated that the land behind this 1 c -Perty is 6 -S feet high and would be level at the end of the property. He indicated that the wall will not provide privacy for either the property owners in the back or for the children in the playground. Mr. Ledermann stated that there is a requirement to replace the eucalyptus trees which would orovide some screening. He indicated that they are thinking Of a six -f;ot high screening wall. Commissioner Stout stated that if sufficient trees are planted they will provide some privacy and this is just an illustrative plan. He indicated however that the line of sight is such that with the grade differential at the school there will be full view into the rear yards; and, if people do not take care of their yards, it will be unsightly. He stated he had concern, for the noise level created by the school children and screening would help to Keep noise down. Commissioner marker asked if it is the contention of the owner that shade equipment is better than trees. Mr. Ledermann replied affirmatively, stating that here are guarantees with the equipment whereas there is no guarantee with trees. Commissioner Barker stated that the odds are that the children will be hurt on the play equipment. Mr. Ledermann replied that Conrnissioner 3arker is right, but they are trying to reduce the odds. He also talked about the grounds and the bark they would use under the equipment to cushion any falls the children might have. Co=issioner Stout asked what the age group of the childrp;i wculd be. Mr. Ledermann replied they would be from 2 -12 years of age. An after school program :iould be provided for the older children. 17r. Ledermann then asked if it would be possible for the Commission to recess for a few minutes in order for him to discuss something that had just come up with the owner of the property. 11 Planning Commission linutes -3- August lI, 1982 0 7:25 a.m. The Planning Cc!fnnission recessed 7:27 p.m. The Planning Commission reconvened Mr. Ledermann stated that one general issue under consideration is the cost of this school as it will be the most expensive of any established by this firm. He indicated that the cost evaluation is so serious trat it may preclude the building of this facility an the property. Mrs. Ruth Cowan, 10069 Yew Street, Rancho Cucamonga, asked whether a four -way stop would be provided at the corner and what noise levels could be expccted. Commissioner Stout stated that a problem would be created if there are a lot of cars coming in and out of the parking lot and he asked how many children would be enrolled in the school during the day and after school. Mr. Gomez replied that only a two -way stop is warranted here; however, another study could be done after the school is in operation to see if a four -way stop would be appropriate. In response to Mr. Stout's question, Mr. Ledermann stated that the school would be in operation from 6 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. He stated the times that thc� playgrounds would be used in the morning and afternoon and that the maximum number of children at the school at any one time would be 220. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. ® Commissioner Rempel stated for clarification that the Design Review Committee had indicated that as many palm trees as were possible and feasible were to be saved and not that all were to be saved. Further, that since this is a conceptual design and not the final, it would not have the detail at this -stage. Commissioner Rempel stated that landscaping in front of the block wall would be cf the type that should bush out and be approximately six -feet high. Ccnmiissioner Rempel stated that one thing the Planning Commission has tried to do is try to provide the type of service that benefits the community and he stated that the facility proposed which would be located in a residential area fulfills that intent. He indicated that the design of the school fits the neighborhood and further, that he felt that perhaps the Commission goes too far when they tell the applicant to add specific equipment to the playground. He indicated that what they are trying to do is to make the community look good and have services that fit into the existing community. Commissioner Rempel stated that he would be willing to accept that the Commis- sion should not demand trees in the playground area if the applicant really does not want them there. Further, in public school playgrounds you will not find trees. Chairman King stated that he would concur if a good faith eff,rt is made to move and preserve the existing palm trees and to proviae landscape Planning Commission Minutes August 11, 1982 buffering. He stated that he sees no reason for trees for the provision of shade. Com'nissioner McNiel asked why the preschool will accept children up to the age of 12 years. Mr. Ledermann stated that there is a need for after school care for children of that age and they provide an afterschcol program. Coranissioner Stout stated that this is a good use for this site which will benefit the community and he was happy to see it. Motion: Moved by Rempe7, seconded by Barker, carriej unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 82 -77 approving Conditional Use Permit No 82 -12 and issuing a negative declaration with the provision that a good faith effort be made to move and preserve the existing palm trees and that shade trees not be required in the play area. C. ENUIROWIENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONE CHANGE 81 -04 - 'WILSON - A change of zone rrom -1- i Ing a am"y AesIcential - 20,000 square foot lot minimum) to R- 1- 10,000 (Single Family Residential - 10,000 square foot lot minimum) for 6.9 acres of land located south cF Banyan Street, east of Archibald Avenue - APN 201- 251 -53 & 54. City Planner, Rick Gomez, reviewed the staff report. Commissioner Barker asked if any of the homes in the 2 -4 dwelling units per acre which were outside of the 300 -foot area were notified of this proposed .zone change. Mr. Gomez replied that only homeowners within the 300 -foot radius had been notified. Mr. Barker stated that this is one of those instances where property owners just outside of the required area should have been notified because of the proposed density change to the adjacent property. He indicated that this is horse property where currently there are two existing trails and adjacent property owners should have been notified so that this could be taken into consideration. Mr. Hopson stated that the rules for notification are applied unifcrmly and under the statute only those property owners within a 300 -foot radius must be notified. He indicated that the City requires the developer to furnish labels so that this procedure can take place, and if the 30 ^,foot radius were not set, it could mean that property owners within a 500 -7oot or 700 -11oot radius wouid have to be notified. Planning Commission Minutes _5_ August 11, 1982 �1 LE1iDE �MAN 1 A \CI irTl F-CTS December 6, 1933 Mr. Michael Vairin, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucanonga 9320 C Baseline Rd. P. 0. Box 307 Ranc}:o, Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: Children's World Daycare Center Church otreet and furner Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA CUP 32 -12 Dear Mr. Vairin: L/A No. 202-0 2-2 This is to apply for a time extension on the above referenced project. It has always been and still is the intention of Children's World, Inc., the Owner, to develop &- is property v.ith a daycare center as prescribed, in the original application. However, economic conditions during the past year have precluded the construction of this size facility. Bar- ring unforeseen occurrences, it is currently the rkmer's plan to begin construction in the spring of 1934. It is for these reasons and in concert with current plans of Children's World, Inc. that this extension is respectfully requested. Architect ILIA Ageat for the Owner KL:nds Encl. neck €692, $62.00 Filing Fee XC: Mr. Joseph H. Barnett, Vice President Development Ms. :arena Salameh, Regional Director p.o. box 2,006 o mission vieio • cchfomic 92690 714 -?S37-39T/ ? c.� ZZZt'z RESOLUTION NO. 82 -77A A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING THE TIME EXTF'JION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 82 -12 WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 17.02.1009 of the Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning l,ommissIon previously approved the above - described project. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the following in— dings: A. That prevailing economic conditions and interest rates have caused a distressed market climate for this project. B. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. That there has been no significant changes to the Land Use Element, Development Code, or character of the area in which the project is located, that would cause the approved project to become nonconforming or inconsistent with current standards. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Project 82plicant Expiration CUP 82 -12 Lederman February 11, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: E NC�V lu"Vll 51U. Page 2 I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of ,January, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: A'ES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E1 11 E LJ A CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA cv�"'onh MEMORANDUM fir° t n •' 15 DATE: January 11, 1584 197 TU: Chairman and Members of th Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner •� BY: Curt Johnston, Associate'Plinner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ANO TENTATIVE TRACT 1 ?433 - K & B - A development 432 single family manutactured homes on 45 1 acres of land within the Victoria Planned Community desigrated Medium and Medium Nigh Residential, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue i - a portion of APN 227- CS1 -06. As the Commission is aware, this project was continued from the December 14, 1963 Planning Commission meeting. The developer is now requesting a further continuance to the January 25, 1984 meeting, as stated in the attached letter. RG:CJ:jr Attachment ITEM D Kaufman and 9-oad Oeve :oprnenc r. ou: J9i1 Napo. ^_7 ooulevcrC Ws Ange,es. Ca. � b: ma SCC64 :213; 475-6711 or 2 72-9914 Kaufman A. Br uad Mr. nick Gomez City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P. 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Re: Tentative Map No. 12433 Dear Mr. Gomez: i December 30, 1983 By way of this letter we respectfully request the Planning Comr..ission to continue the public hearing for the above captioned Tentative Map to their regular meeting of January 25, 1984. Thank you for your cooperation. CWL : b Sincerely, NAND COMPANY ng E 11 l-J L J CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 14, 1983 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomezt City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12433 - K & B - The development of 432 single family semi-detached manufactured homes on 45 acres of land within the Victoria Planned Community, designated Medium and Medium -HiSh Residential, 'located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue - a portion of APN 227 - 081 -05. I. PROJECT AND SITE, DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise site and architectural plans, the - .entative tract trap and issuance of Negative Declaration B. Purpose: Construction of 432 semi- attached single family homes C. Location: Northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken Avenue D. Parcel Size: 45 acres E. Existing Zoning: Victoria Planned Community, Medium (4 -14 du /ac ) and Medium -High (14 -24 du /ac) Existing Land Use: Unmaintained vineyards G. Surroundinq Land Use and Zoninq: North - Unmaintaine vineyar s, Pacific Electric Railroad Tracks, within Victoria PC designated Low (2 -4 du /ac) South - Unmaintained vineyards, within Terra Vista PC, designated Neighborhood Commercial and Medium -High (14- 24.du!ac) East - Unmaintained vineyards, within Victoria PC, designated Medium (4 -14 du /ac) and future park site hest - Unmaintained vineyards, within Terra Vista PC, designated as proposed 100 acre City park TENTATIVE TRACT i2433/K _ 3 December 14, 1983 Page 2 H. General Plan Desi nations: Project Site - Low Me ium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) North - Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac) South - Neighaorhood Commercial and Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) East - L,)* Ped'ua Residential 14 -8 du /ac) Kest - Park Site I. Site Characteristics: The project site slopes to the south uniformly at approximately 3 to 4 percent. All native vegetation has been removed and replaced with vineyards. The Pacific Electric railroad tracks border the north boundary of the site. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The project site is designated on the Victoria Land llse Ma; as Medium (4 -I4 du /ac) and Medium -High (14 -24 du /ac). The Planned Community text allows considerable variation in the style and type of residential development. The Planned Community text permits density adjustments provided the maximum number of dwelling units does not exceed those established in the Planned Community text. Exhibits are provided to illustrate the various site planning and architectural programs considered for these density categories. The project is the first example of modular -built housing in Rancho Cucamonga. The desi;n concept is unique in that it combines a standard 14 -foot wide modular unit with an attachcd carport. (The aeveloper will install all front yard landscaping and automatic door openers will be provided to each carport.) The interior streets of :•he project are proposL•d at 26 feet curb -to -curb, with a single main entry point. The overall parking ratio within the project is 2.2 stalls aer unit. This includes individual carports and common: park:rg lots arranged throughout the project. Parking in driveways or in streets will be prohibited by the developer. Emergency and secondary access is provided at five points; two on Milliken and three on the easterly perimeter road. Access on Milliken will be for energ-_ncy vehicles only, while one access on the perimeter road wily be a card - operated exit only gate for use by residents. With development of the project, full street improvements will be required on Milliken and 3ase U ne and the easterly perimeter. Required storm drain improvements include construction of a levy north of the site to divert runoff to the east into a required retention basin an, installation of a portion of the master plan storm drain system easterly to Day Creek. El__ I TENTATIVE TRACT 12433/K & B December 14, 1983 Page 3 The interior loop street pattern and cul -de -sac was df.signed to establish a heirarchy of streets in order to provide identifiable sub - neighborhoods. To reir,"orce this reeignborhood concept, the street right -of -way on the loop roads was increased 10 feet to allow greater building setbacks and increased landscaping, as well as providing increased access for emergency equipment. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee met to review the project on three separate occasions and provir'ed a positive point rating. Numercus design concerns were discussed from variation in unit and lot sizes to pr ^v= ;ding additional oper. space and b2iter circulation. A number of design revisions were mae..e, Lst the product remains unchanged from the ^:iginrl submittal. The following list outlines the design concer and revisions pro­ ded during the review process. Design Concerns 1. Victoria Planned Community conformance for Land Use Map and neighborhood concept. 2. Need for additional open space. 3. Intzrnal street pattern - Heirarchy -Long Straight Streets - Traffic congestion with single entrance /exit Revisions Revised site configuration with easterly perimeter road and creation of sub - neighborhoods. Small open space areas added along interior loop roads. Creation of two interior loops with special landscz ing. Shorter streets off loop roads. Traffic study to justify design addition of secondary /emergency access points and exit road widened to 24 feet. 4. Architecture -Long Rows of Attached Units. Shorter streets with maximum nine (9) attached units and increased staggering of front setbacks. - Street side elevations Condition of approval requiring additional trim and varried roof structures. -?Aix of front elevations facade Predetermined unit mix by applicant and approved by City Planner. TENTATIVE TRACT 1243311K & 8 December 14, 1983 Page 4 -Unit size and width 5. Limited variation in lct size. 6. Parking availability and distance to uni`. 7. Pedestrian Circulation. a. Significant cut and fill slopes. 9. Base Line and Milliken streetscape. - Esigineered 2.. slopes along frontage. Entry Node at intersection. C. Growth Manaaement Committee: No changes. No change, standard size 2400 sq. ft. (80'X301) Increased number of lots with 150 feet maximum distance from unit. Completion of sidewalk system along all interior streets. Grade taken up through interior of project. Pad elevations from streets decreased. Conditions of approval requiring contoured grading, high quality perimeter wall design. Condition of approval requiring special landscaping and appropriate design elements. Circulation: The Growth Management Committee reviewed the project and- recommended approval with conditions as specified on the Resolution of approval and standard conditions form. The interior streets within the project are proposed at 26 feet curb -to- curb. The Victoria Planned Community established a minimum standard for private streets of 26 feet curb -to -curb with no parking on either side. As stated in the attached .etters, the Fire District and Sheriff'- Department do not feel 26 feet is adequate in all areas Gf this project for emergency access. Therefore, the Fire District and ShEriff's Department is recommending expansion of the Interior loop roads to a full 36 feet curb -to -curb. At this width, cars could be parked on both sides of the street and room for emergency access would still be available. Within cul -de -sacs with no secondary access, the - commended pavement width is 28 fee:.. Interior streets with two access points can rema,n at the proposed 26 feet. 11 CI El E. I] D. Grading Committee: The 5rading Committee reviewed and approved The conceptual grLding plan with conditions. A final plan must be submitted for further review and approval prier to isseu,:ca of building permits. E. Environmental Assessment: An Environmental Impact Report for the Victoria Planned Community was prepared. The applicant also was required to complete Part I of the Initial Study to determine if impacts other than those discussed in the EIR would result in development of this project. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. CORRESPONDENCE: hearing in ThF property owners public hearing correspondence project. This project has bees, advertised as a public Daily Re urt newspaper and notices were sent to all within 30 eet of the subject site. In addition, notices were posted on the property. To date, no has been received either for or against this Ili. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission con uct a public hearing to consider all public input and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission concurs with the findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. ll�bmitted, Rick rAQZ City Tanner i OG:Cj:jr Attachments: t e a ive r: c 1 OW nr�a � r�caif�� n �:- �• � �" .�� i. �5 ..{y.�.,,Zn...yy.��� � Vii•• Zr u�..7...i LL ZIIJ im •� .4 5.., � _ � ,��k c-V i'7 1F �;..3 — � _ T 3 ;'1i:� _. �+f is r�•! ><- wf7lIIi117tA , AMC MAID ]EP A -AT, 4 IsmNi�' It r �•'c rJdols� je4i � �f' +'�� � � . �,� •��3 7Er.3 �rr $ >t �'�= eL2wtr7►li� ♦ I4 Ir. C r.'r7 a_I i't i? t rr I � i iii i I I I� IJ 11 -�� C�e.iC-s Z�:4 ' "Taff PLM ��VMM ��- gem- .4�/fi /ltd NORM RANCHO CLJC sMaNG'i T+ 1 L.L: I-eMr- %PGq N PLANNING DIVISM EXHIMT. 125" SCALE- 171, LL I. E 0 CITY OF RANCHO CLUATMONGA F,.- n IING DPVSM acaow OF c� M)UH n"Em: =ILA - � Tnu: Iii' 4,QZ 1A)54n�r EXHIBIT A19 /f SCALE: -=L- r Li 11 Cl L �� s a" i • ! .. ,. .�� ♦ _ e . • 1 f�l 1 •� l :f, r .r. . ' ti 1 1 \. r � t .. 1 . y i �,,. _ i 4 > p, .� s l ,� ;`f rL r � � r�;�jik;y.�.`�.�`. ��C. ?'fL., �.a,.c`j .n , _ ,;�,_ ^ . �. ^`�, III • ___\ _ �i i'. I rCi'�_ ,.N .:.:; ..:, �'� � .L�h.Tt.;$ ��� /�a� v j 1.knY�.lfl�.' "� l�l. 1 i'J `: f .. � _ i 4 > p, .� s �, ,� rL r�;�jik;y.�.`�.�`. ��C. ?'fL., �.a,.c`j _ ,;�,_ ^ . ^`�, �+ }r'. .-` .,,,:rU .,.j�ti ��� _,,�. may,. u' ".u.� '.._ :: '._.rte. n � ��. ^ :.�.• .,: �y,. ��J : ,�J 3t ', �+' ,. .''� y .,1 y: .. :5':..,.i �: :;z v . °.�y ;= �.< -. �: r � ^'� € ':. �I �od a nk rep. S4 rA 71kk:Zl Ar 71. Jqr �1 LAW USE I to dWAQ 10 - 7: dwoom Uarb / YCVf A f w Lori. 011"c hec z+w fpwcl6"7 a d".fac siac sc ck jmeJ.T R A �w x ac ,xr of de d " . sraLGyt.2:lft ARt.opowpo, A :s+NC *P.+ yusW 'V4 ow""trl sM' s��iC of P°�9 �_.. raarmr prLm �`ar4� 4¢ stem!, a ails owr 7— ILL. plsa..tout v b-J tics of pa^,y -I"" #hm a.o9 L.Mdsaus arm, tarot +c 440- Whoa p=dic _. WIA aa� Low Pt" X`W w _f =mw a.d ca-*~ spar". sa+ r >t x id:+r o, m rids a" .;iiaaim�a, pcw^ Came, sccw4t , = Trpiati vm"v Scroscb S.M a & Saw e e kaLo mLic a .�+o nud, Loe .a.` Ao!gm wow b 2n CITY 9 F RANCHO CUCAMaN A PLANT LNG DLV-NON rrEM: i7iZY�3 — ��IS TITLE: EXHIBIT: _ .4-Y SCALE' E U December 9, 1983 0 ppL NTl' SI l EIZ jrF SODA FIB didwel! Z "Dedacaied To ) our Salen - f rn J Rick Gomez, City Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -0807 Dear Mr. Gomez: As per our meeting on December 7, 1983, the following guidelines remain as a &reed upon, in reference to K&B Project - Tract ;:12433. Those streets decided upon as being "collector" streets will be widened to a width of 36 feet and bordered by verticle curbs. * Streets having two access points connecting to "collector" streets will remain 26 feet in width (no parking). * Streets having single access to "collectors" will be widened to a width of 28 feet (no parking). An additional requirement of the builder that "No Parking" signs be posted and maintained throuo.out the tract. Regarding future projects, we will be interested in knowing what developments are taking place in reference to a new minimum standard set for street widths in private developments. Your cooperation involving these matters is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, FLOYD TZDOEU, Sheriff By Thomas Wickum, Caatain CoT=anaer Rancho Cucamonga Sheriff's Station 9333 Ninth Street Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 (714) 989 -6611 Tk J tlb post Office Box 569, San Bemardino, CA 92403 77 %Z`f33 FOOTIDLL FME PROTECTION DISTRICT P. 0. Box 35 6625 Amethyst Sheet Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91701 (714) 987 -2535 December 8, 1983 Mr. Rick Gomez, City Planner Rancho Cucamonga City Planning Dept. P, 0. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Gomez: Reference Joint Staff review of tentative tract 12433, Kaufman .& Broad, December 7, 1983. After much discussion and consideration, the following conditions should be incorporated into the project to ensure that emergency services can be provided in a practical and expeditious manner: 1. The main entrance will be expanded to a dimension of 24 feet on both sides. 2. That curbs, parking fingers, and extrusions will be reduced to ensure adequate turning radius for fire apparatus (as per fire district standards). 3. The proposed 26 foot widths for branch streets will be accept- able providing that consideration has been given to conditions in number 2 above. 4. Because Courts "P", "PP ", and "CC" are restricted to one point of entry, the street width should be increased to 28 feet, with no parking. As we have stated earlier, we view the interior loops as collector streets, and substandard as proposed. E It is our feeling that the design for collector streets must con- sider not only the aggregate flow, but must give equal consideration to the probability of vehicles obstructing streets of minimum width. 5. To en.si= that emergency services can be provided in an expe- ditious manner, we strongly recommend that the collector loops in this project be increased to 36 feet in width. At times philosophical differences will exist between the theoretical design of a project and the practical ability of emergency agencies to provide service. 0 T_r /Z Mr. Rick Gomez, City Planner December 8, 1983 AObI page two To limit these occasions, we must not commit to the developer without first exhausting the intent of the development review process. Si rely, Jim W. Bowman Fire Marshal E _TT) I I 40 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY C J 11 PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development :review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The pzoject will have no sign_ ficant environmental :Impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: HOMEPLUS APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: HALL & FOREMAN, INC. NA-m= -, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Richard R. DoolittL7le. tiALL , '35 -L Ai Ave. Avg._ Costa Mesa. Ca 92526 141 541- LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL. STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: I -1 J I PRCOTECT DESCRIPTION \r 11 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: single family detached dwell?ng creation fac`lities. ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 45 ac. for project. boil nas. Dr000sed sinale farm v d—wel inas to ha ±93R c F ,with" DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH s1ECESSARY SHEETS) E Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? The project is within the VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY. Please refer to the above- referenced EIR. T_Z Ll WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? iiow many? x_ 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flan=ables or explosives? Explanation of any `iES an3wers above: _9 1 The ❑ropprZy ;c to do graded to arro ndato_iho 64;79le fdr9jy j PVP'n ynPnt coh=ort to !its IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFT_CA'1'ION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for uh is initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Dent Revi w COMM ��� Date 93 Signature Title 1-3 V Cha e , INC. RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The fcliowing information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamong Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Nacre of Develorar and Tentative Tract No.: Kaufman & Broad Conmunities, inc. TTM 124333 Specific Location of Project:_ M.E. Corner of MIlliken & Base Line Avenues 30 ac. 15 ac. PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL 1. Number of single 3001 150 family units: 2. Number of multiple 0 C 0 family units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 8/15/83 4. Earliest date of occupancy: 10 /01;83 Model s and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price Range 6002 —? Bed 65- 75,000 6003_ 1 Bed + Den 65- 75,000 6004 1 Bed 65- 75,000 600:; 2 Bed 65- 75,000 6006 3 vet 65- 75,000 I -4 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 1-2433 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12433, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Hall & Foreman, Inc., applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Count; of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential development of 432 semi - attached single family manufactured homes on 45 acres of land, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Milliken. Avenue into 433 lots, regularly came before the Planning Ccmmission for public hearing and action on January 11, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho ® Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12433 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the pruposed subt'ivision. Resolution No. Page 2 (g) That ttis project will the environment and issued. not create adverse impacts on a Negative Declaration is SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12433, a copy of which attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following condition_ and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The final design and construction details of the perimeter wall along Milliken Avenue, Base Line Road, and the easterly perimeter loop road shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. The design elements of the wall shall include the use of decorative block, trim cap, and pilasters. In addition, the design must incorporate visual breaks in the wall with the use of wrought iron. 2. To designate an entry into Victoria, as required by the Planned Community text, special landscaping and other design features shall be provided at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road. Details shall be provided wii:h the landscape and irrigation plans submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 3. Contour grading practices as defined in the Victoria Planned Community text, shall be used along the street frontages of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road to provide a more natural appearance than the standard 2:1 engineered slopes. Details shall be provided on the final grading plan submitted for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Texturized pavement shall be provided on the main entry road. The appropriate notes and/or details shall be indicated on the final site plan prior to issuance of building permits. 5. The mix of front facades used throughout the project shall be predetermined and indicated on the site plan and submitted for review and approval by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. E C CI E Resolution No. Page 3 6. Street facing side elevations shall be provided with additional architectural trim and roof structures, such as incorporation of a gable on the side eievation. 7. All interior yard fencing shall be provided by the developer. Construction and design details of the fencesnsust be submditted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 8. A 6 foot high sound attenuation wall shall be provided along the north property line adjacent to the railroad tracks. 5. As required by the Victoria Planned rummunity text, windrow style tree planting at 10' on center shall be provided aiong the north and east project boundaries. Details shall be provided on the landscape and irrigation plans submitted prior to issuance of building permits. ® 10. Details of street lights and location and type of vw mail boxes shall be provided to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. 11. The CC &R's shall include provisions to restrict parking in driveways and on- street parking, where the pavement width is less than 36'. The homeowners association shall be responsible for enforcement. ENGINEERING DIVISION 12. Base Line Road shall have a "Right Turn Only" lane for west bound traffic at Milliken Avenue. Additional right -of -way at the intersection based on final design shall be required. 13. Base Line Road shall be designed by the applicant (Plan and Centerline profile) from Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Channel. 14. The applicant shall be required to improve the south side of Base Line Road in front of the development with landscaped median island and 18 -foot wide A.C. pavement. Beautification fee credit will be granted for the landscaping work for the south half of the median island. Resolution No. Page 4 15. The improvement of Base Line Road shall also include roadway transitions per CaiTrans standard nt both ends to meet existing pavement. 16. The applicant shall be required to construct the west half of the median island including landscaping on Milliken Avenue. Beautification fee credit will be granted for the landscaping work for the west half of the median island. 17. The Locp Road shall be constructed to its full width of 36 feet including easterly curb and gutter from Base Line to "A" Street; 26 -foot wide pavement shall be constructed from "A" Street to east tract boundary. 18. All perimeter ^treet right -of -ways shall be dedicated by map. 19. Storm drain plans in interior private streets shall be required for review and approval by the City Engineer. 20. The "A" Street shall have two lanes for outgoing is traffic at the intersection with Loop Road. 21. The applicant shall be required to improve all off -site storm drains and flood protection measures as shown on the tentative map. The improvements shall include, but not be limited to the levee at the north boundary, detention basin and the alternate 2 drainage system as shown on the map (Drainage Exhibit). Approval by the City Engineer and San Bernardino County Flood Control District of the final design of the drainage and flood protection systems shall be required prior to recordation of the map or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. 22. The final grading plan shall be prepared in accordance with the conditions specified by Grading Committee with approval of the conceptual plan. 23.. Access onto Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road shall be for emergency purposes only and shall conform to the standards and requirements of the Engineering Division, Foothill Fire District, and Sheriff's Department. 11 Resolution No. Page 5 24. The Final Tract coordinated for the map. Map and Detailed Site Plan shall be consistency prior to recordation of 07HER AGENCIES 25. The interior loop /collector street shall be expanded to a navemert width of 36' and designed with vertical curbs, 26. Both the entry and exit lanes at the main entrance shall be 24' wile curb -to -curb. 27. Enterior streets with a single access shall be expanded to 2E' curb -to -curb. 28. All standard requirements of the Foothill Fire Protection District for turn- around and turning radii shall be provided. 29. A revised Tract Flap incorporating all of the applicable conditions of approval shall be signed off and approved by the Foothill Fire Protection District and Sheriff's Department prior to recordation. APPROVED AND ADOPTED 7HIS 117111 DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING CCW- ISSICN OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Acting Secretary o the Planning Commission I, RISC G-OMEZ, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of �ianuary, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT: CCMNfISSIONERS: � °O,d„L eQO cy— cccc Yer g. -- `n.� tl ) SL fi it V pNi ��N g�a p cY y�rV V OGr rL O wV PeOO LJE— 0a � �N LN aaD _Y.O iOV Sy OY�`. yCIG Jb� LY'yC yU .=C rN nN> � r T g � ` e r• ` 9 tl y» C u r es T tl^ ^ Y ^ a 2yi) Vr` E NAY Gn° YU= Or�? .• C I Q— V �q _ _ t J Cc • ��� g;� °' -� _gam �y` _e.= �L �•c� �_ 4 O.w P9 O'C O.4r J —CC N �• 00� CY r•y �•= � N- .._�� aOG6N ON YG J °J °N L) C <Op �a�•J' (`.Y °�•° C`m_Y yM C C 1 (Opp C T O p tl C C 641 r S V p> C v V � O =ti K rc- . .. '� •j W G r. Y O r O p f i�� � O S W •�'�J C 7 < tl G L e V \I Ji i p GC+ p -1 C ` `nom pN 6a tlpr GO )— p0 wL 00 VC N ^a �- � ���www::: ♦4� b �; i _W r °° E C L�Q�w pL aC) G` G C d N C Z O r is L Y C p _ Lo C a %-.t Cc W C iSi Y A' O r( ° Ctl L Ctl �+ N C <� T C C t >= a C G 06 C C P C O V EI C p O O -� �- W `^Jr1i C V OZ y �N y �Q•» V�V� VpY 6Lp Fro 6Vr _pI i Y m �� • °ce w.°,4 �cYc ..s` Svc t '1 a Y O ° p Y. a = - r ') 6 p L r N r w 0- V 4 Y �J • « X v �j ! r � u C p= C�� u� C V 6 ✓ G ° V + C n l = p i u ! � r 06� = ✓V S= �LV — ^ =0 OVVw rr yL`r -Or Yr '`� « + Ga�� �r�� +-p�� rvw... q -nom >pi O. .� G✓ GY ` L+D� GYD VOVG O °G Z ?z MOC «V ur �DiVp�°C jar V' Y r C� 22 � L� •Ni a wL•^^ 1'°C�6 CD•JN)Y ��Oy y��•�Mn CfO.i�v r i O u VO ' I Vrr. o�C = «Y C viYwlC r .OirC n _ s ���� �gCg�� cg ^'•'_��.° g .= Ems-' -�= .�� N - °CC.� CoLL CY _ o .Cw O ✓ ° V G G C z L D' •^ �yy y Z' O✓ C Gaue C_ .V�.s�P Or'OYLO '� ursV`_ ?a VYY V y V L 1 L O V « C G a OY ip.V?L OV4'Ow C �r CY «� iv Y-J— �L�� —O•V ` VC r°�� DaOV J�LVCaC Oyu= «� O Very = SG l!,,��J =GiOSiJ � —N` NC G` r� > rpv <��� qai 0`CM�� <a rdvw •iOp�`U "' Co aY+ v O p « ir ✓�V.r ��.«+Y .O.r DV�y.YCNU�Vr y °w OCr = =C= � .0. V C« Y L NY C _ « «w ° ✓ O` � O •Jw�a �°> .Ji. u s�°���V rL ✓� "I _ -C VJ ✓� A Clr6 a600L p°3 3 L.t.5 a�wi a •L" P C T Y O —« r'L YeC L O � C} W JOOya _ «V t r � V � ° ✓�� L- ao'•d5 o� + ` — teG DO .Gi•� —C1 -ML VPCwt •rnt °. r L �r4° ut « G m'! C O C L V aoi r p pPV -C60r, =�V00+ - QQ� °rNi p�? y+ °SS 'CO �V Y«D ��V °�yi On G ✓O G 2 C V L G� i��« V ¢. y O. O O _ r« � �r .V. r ✓[p� P °)QLC `CGO r VOcO -G C V ■OJ r C V J= a C C n a G s no T C V v ✓ C O . r CY O J q M _` r Y! V: « r _ Ypy > cc Ga P4 Cy.�G _�f y C L•a°. l �! .V.r G =Y7V YV Gr i_E V. C O- iu° p0 GOYV�D ^pP CnO P•.rVC Yv� DL P j r O�— nY1t • G C a Y V � u PL ✓ -- -_�L L.ee —� �. L.�tta. �JP Y +.. Y �D Vr Yr ✓_ per• � r_ �'e�cc C N V V= T° 1_ G P N S t Y L �J V, �•J' S � 6 0 � C NE. �- o ( C 1 QQ C ♦1 r� U g i + r E q � + 6 V � y C U v C L> r7 V V y i l V LOO. L q N 4 L+ r N V Q L T C O 6V L G .j dP C C p>p > y J✓ u p = V a as Vr qV L f4c; Is' C 7 -✓ {t .Lw pqC L� i^ O -- � t�.. j M 4 C, V N } 9 L � r` PV _- +G p r NYP +C_ si V °1f4 V N■ P O T L N G > V q CO Q r i°li NVy 6a j _ ✓ q MrN Ct5 + N 5�° V d ^` O CSC �U- rNV C --SNP -Z rJ q_C VO -t , r _ 4.Q C�i LMV d- CP -r Q 6 -t N +N�Oi OV LV -06 C Cr NC NN+ Z JLG- C P rP 6dCP ;C6 4w -wL q T a p C c =, F O C i � 5 a O g ° =C qiq l w L >e •'• 6GN - _a + 222 L 4 N N L Y Q ql G L F_V Z 4 =qy= Og"•'tw40 t0i O dCONr> 4•Li 9 O r�� =Gr YLOPU VNC• rY y - -L NV t o••G OPi_o .Q —qdy c 'Y LL ±v Pdo <yO= E4 =4�N o E NO e q W +O� cVQ ',nC4Ft FT �Nq C� - `Pr�q` .10 O- P P C N V T c p _ ty r i -_ `CC` O C e r Lo• c° � P � � �V�pV L���. d�O -Cyy PCd O� V CV`O•� o r4 � � na i 4 -80 8 C C d � N= � C C� I r -20, y •di N C P 1 O: q N °p O C .L•'T 6 r� NNrL VOA dd +ca sT LL -_�� _Q .Le •°4• < o�_ d 4� -4V ^N a ♦ +NO-i. cCioq ��°o,_LaE e."..v. Qc°d,e o .N1.ac -�a L V q Q' Vqq VAC° CCy°,r� =NJ` `bC I4 Vp NNN wL r �• 6C d G (` V QP c V�V N F ♦1 0 Q' ,V^rNV NL i! V p4 _�1{�6. N =r wC0 d .q�� �g V� NNOL V •L O _� N 5�Q = O ry P M 5 ., V C `n w C r✓ r 01 N 4` O yCw4VCr -r Y4 P y L�LV Y1 % =OE NZ rr GL `Nl gCl eVP fn NO•Lu LV 2x.cMVr+• vz 6i V M - 1 9 i 1 J N W = r C O V r C■ V Q O � N y +��� "<YC L•� �» y�L � �+a� d �g �uM tii •C•.. a• �_ � of VX pV V `p` 1 v�V V ONO = O� Z=-T• C= E Rol V Y C Y w Y SO Op Y V iJJ M Y J U a r4, r ■Ow vg 1 �9 O M� �� LPL° j 10 O�d fy �1l�''yjyV xr { -{���11 C YI � 6` mow! IC i�M `6� VQ■. °Y iO� a��`C O aV SlV wL ii �O7VO� Gw �COo G� � � C V - � ■ i V 4� Q L V� 4 t Y O V O6 •�a1i �w L w r�a O V PQ g pp i /•- C V �I L� �. C rYi YAM OJr -N Oi Or- 9 C O O ^^ IC "� VS O.V yiy ` Sr_ V yOYV ECa 6 JOOWN G N � SVa WNCO WVV �Q t��QiGr <M�i LVpaO C Y r� 1� OI O� {:J �= Vr °x C V - v O' 6 OO i O ° O r 4 cV V � � c �o � V i Y_ O 4 _a y {p u - <j- S � 1 +� w V C Vpp O G� C O V a V W L iI > O' NI • 1 C C 2 42: 4L 1 Z •< �iC r VLF •� uu OQ y�yY i � �_x V soy V 1 4 C 4 s - •ss• ~ I,_ O i d I c c e O- i O y C zi L V 41. C� Q lj O C I Q g< a G9> Z jj •� n� �> i = I Iw rY 6.O~ L �Qi �C•'r y i C 1 O` V{� rC G G y~. _v - L� r YG = L i >� C y a+ • O YY C Op W aC C u� i>. VV PNO OCL�L �Ca' E0= IS yi 8.p VC °MVP r <O VC C O� iYi� y p LL �'•1 �i L e- �LWY.6 O V WW �I ■1 oYwV 0.� L �= Vr °x C V - v O' 6 OO i O ° O r 4 cV V � � c �o � V i Y_ O 4 _a y {p u - <j- S � 1 +� w V C Vpp O G� C O V a V W L iI > O' NI • 1 C C MM i Y Q p N T 'woo j ^ Y L) U ^ >^ r Y p J ✓= V � C� � r L - !!E 1 CP �� O N° Li •O N C S G J C r lo O NV C 9 r Y Y �v G C � V N6 `..• � �' J Z Y�T_ .b� P•°w �n 7 OY� O� q/� yV O LrY N€ C V p L �gOL 1 C NJ N Y g - - E' e V L ..• ' r T M i 6 Y ro :f: �g �= 8; 0• � «�a �� i Pig ! � I i � V pCrt >•i VVC �� � L N• F_ v 1 P Y MpMVO � ^T O•y V N� NV ��CI hN lJ '`� -' V V L� V °aC� rr 4° V= �-ey N9 �i ✓r `YM �� Or I /� /� O•. � O p d � -^, O � O -^ 4E {CQ� N Cy J j r�= O ` Y I`� � r V =Ppr ^ M VV= Ml FI LPN Lr f..i L'J s lz 14 -) W k r e W ` V I M1I I V •O •O m O• w 2 V T j. V 2 P C C C Y C C C•`O_� cur O•°+ <P � _ O_OCry l N_ f 9 C � V 4° � N L 1 O 6' D� ` d ^ 1 • V� ^ <Iy N p L J v i' � L¢ ' C is V D• ` ` 9 L Na J �•V`V °�L '•rr` S_ C.°r F S O. P I• V r O _. O Y V N d -� •r V! N P) 0 O _ C, C C O C O � 6 r G 1O yp Mrre NV`�Y CA r y'n ___ C y ^� ELNCL VIE O ^pL� CC CC .N = .2w El t C V` u ON °Cy L `O£ vG ° {p C aV p p9p C> ^p P <O- rup OPO�Op ^° L C' G•' C LT Q r_ r� II I 1 Ov Y N C'� p O L C Y C j J y Y Pr P G C_ O .•• =` a �� C p N ,! I . E O O T Y Y A O V`= r V •Li a_ V _ r ° N O pp � J O � r 4 r S• > ^> n- ■- � a s t O u O a^ � C� � j I `_ G 1 � V p I Wi I.n 4c4 20 i V M Tt «u Msa � � `�caY =0L =� L•�Or . �♦ OOC 1 s�.V. C r.y �� - {"i r � iJ C c o, 0 v X dS I ✓ V �v =Y A D S « V« V y 6: I a o• D ` « Y O D ✓ I �I = P C 7 r y 8 Q P 4 V S C ^ O V ° °s Nt. �e`o `W fit <v� +o T5� YL ar£ 4c4 20 i V Tt «u Msa � � `�caY =0L =� L•�Or . �♦ OOC 1r s�.V. r.y �� - r � � v X dS I ✓ �v S « V« V y 6: I TO « Y O D ✓ I P r y :• I.°-r ° °s Nt. �e`o `W fit <v� +o T5� YL ar£ .°. °y�` fig ✓ C =Z- Coco i'� '�"� cam»: 1 C O ✓u m C _ Og V <L Cy I 4 -6` � ! V 9 4 r r'✓J G S OV I P ca r Or�V l y ,Z V =V� eL .S p C 6 V C ✓Y y O V g S L V O _ V Y GP 7 • yy C P L y y« r C Y « O c C C 4 C Y P < V V O� — ��rr V =� rC 4pOppyV` Cr'� �•M r aw «i �J rVC i o I D �= 0.��! M + \O VC O O ryecrye ! V �5fi f r CY.� {C YYr c« a°-^ tl� Vy .�, 1�`OQ w — Y O J q Sp V o Q« V� V r_ Y C C ZIL ✓ C « aL Y _O p r fi (` c Y V « r r= J r � 4 J — V O r r �OrO N«V 6rr <V L— VVV i iz YO0 C �- C O � N, NA �i mi �i �i 0 4c4 «u «day ca4 «u Msa � � `�caY =0L =� L•�Or . �♦ OOC 1r s�.V. :• I.°-r ° °s Nt. �e`o `W fit <v� +o T5� YL ar£ .°. °y�` fig ✓ C =Z- Coco i'� '�"� cam»: 1 C O ✓u m C _ Og V <L Cy I O -6` r ! V 9 a V C G O r J V.✓ . =rV 4 Or�V DC VO ,Z V =V� .S p C 6 V C ✓Y y O V g S L V O _ V Y GP 7 • yy C P L y y« r C Y « O c C C 4 C Y P < V V O� — ��rr V =� rC 4pOppyV` Cr'� �•M r aw «i �J rVC i o I D �= 0.��! M + \O VC O O ryecrye ! V �5fi f r CY.� {C YYr c« a°-^ tl� Vy .�, 1�`OQ w — Y O J q Sp V o Q« V� V r_ Y C C �� v ✓ C « aL Y _O p r fi (` c Y V « r r= J r � 4 J — V O r r �OrO N«V 6rr <V L— VVV i iz r Cfi i c V VV C OV O S 4 a — V l . i V _ O s Yi C P L O O. « r _T ux a N Y p o a� V � r 3 eC i _ y < �I Y C O a p � 0 o . C N N V r be r. P Y O — V = �Y C « Y C V — C uv` 11 I� U W cl O C. 11 I El c c d d O d r L y 4 C i a vW O T 4^ V — r :g r V yC � Lg Y $V T� 7 � C d c q O a M C w t � V � a v — L M q 4 4 G r VMS O 7 T P c -. r V �O — q G i c o Lr c ` c M a- - a — V rw t C L O � V S t D 4 L C 7 o O. 4 D s — M V r° L°e n V O O V q qo 4 C q si N L 4 da o= C f 4n E E — L �v qC O 4 8 q � L >4 „oa 9nT � Y i MO'L it 4 o cyy g= S V L V V sq � r > ` Y ` � w v v ve N v C Y L F =I` r �7 0 Z t CI r J r i q V __ OQ VYI - 1 ul 0 0 M 0 u O' O. y V O G u l u 4 � D � ='Z M G O n� 'e4 _ Y V y ` C q � � V O 0 d c 0 a v i 0 v c 1• n i v M 9 9 Y� O q 4 C -c I C 4 �aq t V G � C G e Z— V O r 4 r 15 i c T- 0 =4 1V N L 4 C i C 0 o - c od° D C V C t a Ma O M V Q � q P C �C b Q V _ F C V r P. P� Q � C T a � q V L V V O O"J CG O.rVD N `�yI \tyI n ',1 11 11 CITY OF RANCHO CLiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Cow-Tiissi0n FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGE 83 -08 - TRUAX (TENTATIVE TRACT 12525) - A change in zone from Mealum (8-14 ou /ac) to Low Meoium (4 -0 du /ac) for 16.5 acres of land located cn the west side of Center Avenue between Arrow Highway and 26th Street - AFN 209 - 091 -10. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a zone ctiange from Medium Density Residential (8 -14 dulac) to Low Medium Residential (4 -8 du /ac). B. Purpose: To construct 122 zero iot line dwellings. C. Location: West side of Center Avenue, between Arrow Route and 765 Street. D. Parcel Size: 16.5 acres. E. Existing Toning: Medium Density Residential (8 -14 du. /ac). F. Existing Land Ilse: Vacant Parcel. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Industrial, zoned Medium High (14 -24 du /ac) South - Single Family Residential, zoned Low (2 -4 du /ac) East - Vacant parcel, zoned Industrial Park West - Vacant parcel, zoned Medium (4 -14 du /ac) H. General Plan, Designations: Project Site - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac), Industrial Park North - Medium High Residential (4 -14 du /ac) South - Low (2 -4 du /ac) East - Industrial Park West - Medium (4 -14 du /ac) ITEM E PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA January 11, 19,84 Zone Change 83 -08 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The Planning Commission at its December 14. 1983 meeting held a public hearing and approved Tentative Tract 12525 for the construction of 122 zero lot line units. In addition, the Commission ra !.commended approval of the associated Negative Declaration. Please find attached a copy of the Planning Commission staff report which fully describes the project. A change of zone to LM was a condition of approval on the Tentative Tract Map. The project_ site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the types of uses that would be permitted within the Low Medium (4 -8 du, /ac) Zone. The zcne change in conjunction with the development will be compat11ble with the Medium Density General Plan designation of 4 -14 du /ac. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommooate the proposed project. The charge of zone is consistent with the General Plan and has a density within the range ailowed. The approval of this zone change will not create adverse impacts on surrounding properties. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing item in The Dail�y�Re,ort newspaper and all property owners within 300 feet of the su6ect property have been notified. To date, no correspondence related to the zone charge has been received. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input anti elements relative to this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the findings, adopticn of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. ly S4.-,--Nitted, RICK GQMET- City Phanrer Rt� /FD /kep Attachments: Staff Report Tentative Tract 12525 Resolution El 11 17J El LJ E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM.ONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: December 14, 1953 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 12525 - TRUAX A total development and subdivision of 16.5 acres into 123 lots, comprising 122 zero lot line units in the R -3 /PD zone, generally located on the west side of Center Avenue, between Arrow Highway and 26th Street - APN 209 - 091 -10. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a tentative tract map for the above- described protect. B. Purpose: To create 122 single family units C. Location: Generally located on the south side of Arrow Highway, between Turner Avenue, and Center Avenue D. Parcel Size: 16.5 acres E. Existinq Zonina: R -3 /PD F. Existinq Land Use- Vacant Parcel G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoninq: No r - In ustr;a , zoned Medium High (14 -24 du /ac) South - Single Family Residential, zoned Low (2 -4 du /ac) East - Vacant Parcel, zoned Industrial Park West - Vacant Parcel, zoned Medium (4 -14 du /ac) H. General Pian Designations: PreJ —ect Site - Medium Residential (4 -14 du /ac), Industrial Park North - Medium High Residential (14 -24 du /ac) South - Low (2 -4 du /ac) East - Industrial Park West - Medium (4 -14 du /ac) ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSIr STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 1L.,25 /17RUAX December 14, 1983 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site consists of a vacanr vineyard with a slight elevation gain towards the center of the site. In addition, the site contains a variety of indigenous plant materials which are native to the area. The project site is surrounded to the north, south, and east by paved streets which are unimproved. There are no structures located on the site. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting the approval of a tentative tract map (Exhibits "A & B "), which will create 122 zero lot line homes on 16.5 acres of land located on Center Avenue, between Arrow Highway and 26th Street_ Please note that a previously approvea project (TT 11915 - Mayer) would have created a mix of patio and townhome units, for which a zone change from R -1 to R -3 /PD has been previously granted. The new Truax proposal of 122 zero lot line units is in keeping with the predominant single family character of the North Town area, ultimately creating an environment which is more supportive and compatible with the existi,,g neighborhood. In addition, the applicant is the previously approved R -3/1 designation to Low 1%edium (4 -8 has been provided requiring necessary zone change at a meeting. proposing a change of zone from 'D (Medium Density, 4 -14 du /ac) du /ac). A condition of approval the applicant to secure the subsequent Planning Commission Please note that this project reflects the City's recently adopted zoning regulations which outline various standards related to open space, recreation facilities, landscaping, energy conservation, etc. Conditions of approval have been provided which fully address the new requirements. Desig❑ Review Committee: The Design Review Committee was primarily co—nc—ern-e-d with the perimeter block wall (graffiti problem) and suggested the following alternatives to the present design configuration (Exhibit "D "). These include: (a) adding earth berming along wall frontages, designed to reduce ultimate wall ".eight; (b) providing segments of wrought iron fencing designed to eliminate writing surfaces; and, (c) planting perimeter walls with thorny shrubs and vines designed to maximize security while eliminating writing surfaces. Staff recommends that one of the above alternatives (or a combination) be chosen by the Planning Commission and a;'ed as a condition of approval for this project. r U 11 2 C PLANNING COMMISSTI STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 1 ,,[5 /17RUAX December 14, 1983 Page 3 The Design Review Committee was also concerned with 2 -story zero lot line dwellings (blank elevations) facing Arrow Highway and 26th Street and suggested: (a) *_hat 2 -story dwellings be eliminated on units visible to public view (unit "K facing 26th Street); or, (b) that these unit eleva` ions be reversed providing greater amounts of variety and visual relief to the streetscape. A condition of approval has been provided on the attached Resolution designed to mitigate this s�tuation. C. Development Review Committee: The Development Review Committee was primarily concerned with providing street improvements contiguous to Arrow Highway, Center Avenue, and 26th Street. Improvements are to include curb, gutter, pavement, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, cross gutters, etc., where appropriate (see Standard Conditions). In addition, the Devei the applicant work in District in order to Channel. D. Gradinq Corxnittee: applicant's conceptual precise grading plan. opment Review Committee recommended that concert with the County Flood Control convey storm water to the Deer Creek The Grading Comrtiittee approved the grading plan subject to approval of a E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant and is attached for your review. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts related to the project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The findings listed on the attached Resolution are supported by the following facts: o The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the development and the proposed single family uses are in accordance with the objectives of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. o The proposed site plan, in conjunction with the conditions of approval., is consistent with the current development standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing item in The ijaily Report newspaper ano ^tices were sent tc property owners wit1.in feet of the subject property. PLANNING COMMISSIr STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT 1 - 45 /TRUAX December 14, 1983 Page 4 V. RECOMMENDATION: i :. is recommended tha conduct a pub is heering and receive matter. If after such :onsideration the facts for findings and conditions of attached Resolution and ;ssuance of recommended. Respehtf lly"�w bmitted, Rick gbmez City qlanner RO:FD:jr c A(tachments: Exhibit "A" - Exhibit "B" - Exhibit "C" - Exh:bit "D" - Exhibit "E" - Exhibits "F -I" t� t the Planning Cor:enission all public input on this Cor:nission can support the approval, adoption of the i Negative Declaration is Tentative Tract Map Site Plan Landscape Plan Wail Details Site Utilization Map - Elevations Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval With Conditions 11 [ .� - 11 11 Q = C] g e t _ `3 z U Y W W C V v AVAftP.Yll! 3 ac4d �,MV A Y s O1 o S AVAftP.Yll! 3 ac4d �,MV A PL.ANNNG DW SON' a ,.n -• ;wry. -.._. _ rte-' s n s- I I' 133riS ilL9= ki, EXHIBIT: SCALE: LU P� WOR I • r `r ,< ,�� •v ice! c wC 6I(i (K I ? C --- 4b1 ' 7 �I Cd ri t - ';i._._ _ j- - - - - 1 NORTH ® r CITE' OF rrE%s: RANCHO CUCANIONGA Trrl.E= PLAL1;'VING iDVIVISM EXHIBIT- Y SCALE- El 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDI`1G APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE NO. 83 -08 REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE ZONING FROM MEDIUM TO LOW MEDIUM FOR 16.5 ACRES, LOCATED WEST OF CENTER AVENUE BETWEEN ARROW HIGHWAY AND 26TH STREET - APN 209- 091 -10 WHEREAS, on the 10th day of ;November, 1983, an application was filed and accepted on the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of January, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65854 of tine California Government Code. SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Plannin-1 Commission has made the following fi— wings: 1. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed zone in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area; and 2. Th at the proposed zone change would not have significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and 3. That the proposed zone change is in conformance with the General Plan. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has found that this project wilt not create a significant adverse impact on the environment and •-ecomaends issuance of a Negative Declaration on January 11, 1984 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: 1. That pursuant to Section 65850 to 65855 of the _ California Government Code, that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval on the 11th day of January, 1984, Zone Change No. 83 -08. 2. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Zone Change No. 23 -08. 3. That a Certified Copy of this Resolution and related material hereby adopted by the Planning Commission shall be forwarded to the City Council. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis �. Stout, Chairmar. - ATTEST: I� Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that thj foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co- emission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: C E 11 Ll CiTY OF RANCHO CUCILMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1934 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRL. iENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 33 -23 USER - A request for a fitness center to be located at 95 Arrow Highway, Suite H. within the Cucamonga Business Park located on the southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald (Subarea 3 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan). I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Conditional Use Permit B. Purpose: To operate a fitness center C. Location: 9507 Arrow Highway, Suite H D. Existin Zoninq: industrial Specific Plan (Subarea 3) General in 5-t id E. Existing Land Use: Office /Industrial F. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single Family - L South - Industrial - iSP East - Industrial - ISP West - Industrial - ISP G. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Industrial North - Residential South - Industrial East - Industrial West - Industrial H. Site Characteristics: This building is part of a series of buildings within a fully improved irdustrialioffice park. All street improvements, parking and landscaping are existing. iTEM F PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 83 -23 /LINGER January 11, 1984 Page 2 II. ANALYSIS: A. General: Attached is a letter and exhibit from the applicants requesting approval for the operation of a fitness center as described therein. The proposa? consists of conducting aerobic exercise and weight training classes. The building is located within the Cucamonga Business Park, which consists of twenty individual industrial /office buildings comprised of various uses as permitted under the Industrial Specific Plan. This particular use is classified as personal services and requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the Planning Commission. Uses of this nature generally are determined based upon parking availability and assurances that the use will not create disturbances or problems for adjacent businesses or uses. In the past the Planning Commission has approved Conditional Use Permits within this center for such uses as churches, dance studios, and the Casa Coiina health care facility. The Industrial Specific Plan has no specific requirements other, than availability of parking. B. Parking: This building was developed on the basis of the office parking standard of one space per 250 square feet of floor area. With uses of this nature the Commission has the ability to restrict the intensity of the use in order to insure that the facilities can accommodate the level of use desired. There are currently 21 parking spaces designated for the exclusive use of this suite. Also, there are an additional 35 spaces which the land owner has designated as back -up spaces for this user. in a recent field survey by staff during business hours, it was verified that these spaces were currently not used by other tenants. Based upon the description provided by the applicant, they intend to have the majority of their classes conducted in the late afternoon after 5:00 p.m. through the evening up to 9.00 p.m. They do, however, wish to conduct a morning class during the weekday. The applicant estimates that the classes may run up to 40 people per class. Based upon the availability of the parking and the type of tenants which are currently within the adjacent buildings, we would recommend that classes conducted during the normal business hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. not exceed more than 25 persons per class in order that t e class size will not create additional demand or strain upon available parking within the vicinity. After 5:00 p.m. taere appears to be ample parking available to meet the needs of the proposed tenants as well as existing tenants which do not cperate beyond 5:00 p.m. 11 U U PLANNING COMMISSION CUP 83 -23 /LINGER January 11, 1384 Page 3 STAFF REPORT C. Noise Attenuation.: Another major concern with regard to a use of this nature and its compatibility with other tenants, is the need for proper noise attenuation. Uses of this nature generally utilize music and weights which could cause noise disturbances to adjacent users. Therefore, it has been a standard condition of other CUP's of this nature to require the interior of the facility to install proper noise attenuation walls which will reduce the level of noise emitted from this suite to adjacent suites to acceptable levels. IiI. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In Chapter 17.04 of the Development Code, approval of a Conditional lase Permit requires the Planning Cog =ission to make certain findings prior to approval_ These findings are listed it. the attached Resolution. In their review, staff determined that these findings can be affirmatively found since this use is not in conflict with either the General Plan objectives, Development Code purposes, or the industrial Specific Plan objectives and purposes. Additionally, this use together with the conditions ; hould insure that this use will not cause any public health, safety, or welfare problems to adjacent improvements or facilities. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This project has been advertised as a public hearing within lre Daily Report newspaper, notices have been sent to property owners w suu feet of the Cucamonga Business Park and the property and vicinity have been posted for notification of this hearing. At the writing of this report, no correspondence has been received either for or against this project. V. RECOMMENDATION• It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive any public input on this proposal. At the conclusion of the public hearing, it is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and material relative to this project and to give final consideration to the attached Resolution. Rick &met City/Planner RG:MV:jr i Attachments: Letter from Site Plan Resolution Applicant of Approval C December 9, 19 83 Mr. Curt Johnston CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Planning Department 9340 Baseline Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Johnston: The following is a description of the basic activities of Stars Tanning and Fitness Centers. we are oriented to the health of women but our programs are not restricted to women. Our primary function is to provide aerobic exercise and training• for our clients. This consists of classes generally from five to possibly as many as 30 to 40 persons; however, we estimate our classes will probably run an average of less than 25 people. In addition to aerobic exercise we will also provide weight training, availability of vitamins and work -out clothing. Our major emphasis is late afternoons after 5:00 PM with our last class possibly at �,:Gv PM. we currently have a morning class and expect to maintain that but the majority of our interest is after normal working hours in the evening. We will be happy to answer any questions if further information is required. Thank you. Sincerely, /STARS TAAINIIN,(G AND FITNESS CENTERS Unngg$'r i Denise Knig t 0 11 U C C Type of use and hours of operation of each adjacent occupany in Building 7. Suite A General Marble Corporation_ Administrative Offices Hours: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM General Marble Corporation occupies the southerly balance of Building 7. Parking is set up so that General Marble's parking is located at the south end of Buildina 7 and Stars Aerobicise Tanning and Fitness Center's parking is located at the north end of Building 7. There is also more than adequate parking in front of Building 1, 9567 Arrow, directly across from Building 7. The tenants of Building 1 do not require all the parking that is available to Building 1 and that parking would be available if additional parking were required. The tenants in Building 1 are all primarily office users with hours of 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. si-fzaxa.2 D4/071rra L 1 1 • (1 M L 9 � C l 1 Jl � A�� • •/� fff----��ill ) n ll !11 111 i1 ll 1111)!11 � a < Ikke 'J 1= i^ , I= h st I L s �rr J i S 1 Jij 1111111 _C i 1 = s e . rl r 11 I �y�y ti o N tat Z H m -v U2 m a J i S 1 Jij 1111111 _C i 1 = s e . rl r 11 I �y�y ti o N tat Z H m -v U2 m a RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 83 -23 FOR A FITNESS CENTER LOCATED AT 9507 ARROW HIGHWAY, SUITE H, IN THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AREA WHEREAS, on the 9th day of December, 1983, a complete application was filed by Lynda Unger and Denise Knight for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of January, 1987, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which t'.e use is proposed; and ® 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of ";he applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 2: That Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -23 is approved subject_ to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. That all City Codes and Ordinances shall be complied with at all times. 2. If operation of this facility should cause any adverse impacts upon business or properties in the immediate vicinity, this permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for reconsideration, modification or revocation. 3. This CUP shall be null and void '.n the event of an ownership change or a significant change in its operation. In either case, a new or modified CUP shall be required. Resolution No. Page 2 4. Class size on weekdays shall not exceed 25 people between the hours of 3:00 a.sa. to 5:00 p.m. Class sizes shall never exceed an amount greater than the parking available for this facility. 5. Noise attenuation material shall be provided on interior wails separating this use from adjacent uses. Details shall be shown on appropriate construction drawings and shall be approved by the City Planner and Building Official. Such material shall be installed prior to occupancy of structure. APPROVED ZND A50PTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary o the Planning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that: the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Conanission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January, 1984, by the following ote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 11 El E CITY OF RANCHO CIUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner By: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -21 - EN AGAPE - Proposed 15 ?0 sq. ft. addition to expand the offices and classrooms for an existing church located at 9101 19th Street - APN 202- 041 -41. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested Approval of site plans and elevations B. Purpose: Construction of " `fice and classroom addition C. Location: Southeast corner of 19th Street and Beryl D. Parcel Size: 5 acres E. Existinq Zoning: Low Residential (2 -4 du /ac) F. Existing Land Use: Church G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Singe Family Residential; Low Residential °oath - Vacant; Low Residential East - Vacant; Low Residential West - Single Family Residential; Low Residential H. General Plan Designations. Project Site - Low Residential North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Low Residential I. Site Characteristics: The site has been developed as a church facility including a sanctuary, portable trailer, parking lot, and several mature trees adjacent to the proposed building location. Street improvements exist on Beryl only, and limited parkway olanting exists on Beryl and 19th. ITEM G PLANNING COMISSION CUP 83 -21 /EN AGAPE January 11, 1984 Page 2 STAFF REPORT J. licab le Regulations• The the Lot; ssl ertia itrict to a Conditional Use Permit requirements. H. ANALYSIS: Development Code regulations for permit church facilities subject and in accordance with setbac1, A. General: The proposed addition will utilize an existing concrete pad on the west side of the church building. The addition will provide needed classroom and officz soace for the existing congregation and staff, therefore; will not result in an increase in parking demand. The Engineerina Division recommends street improvements alin,g inn Street. The existing trailer used for classrooms is a non - conforming use under the Development Code regulations and previous Interim Zoning Ordinance. Trailers of this nature are generally permitted as a temporary use during construction and must be removed within two (2) _years. Although the occupancy date is unknown, the trailer has clearly existed for more than two years. In the past, the Planning Commission has allowed tralers for classrooms or offices subject to a CUP with a two year t '3:ne limit. In such cases, the trailers are to be removed prior to occupant' of the permanent building. An appropriate condition has been attached to require removal of the existing trailer prior tc occupancy. B. Design Review Committee: The Committee recormer+ded approval subject to the following: (1) preservation of oxisting mature trees on the west side cf the church; and (2) match nci building materials with existing church. The applicant has agreed to these requirements, as shown on the attached exhibits. IIT. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code regulations. The proposed use tunether with the recommended conditions of approva; will not be detr.,nental to the public health or materially inj_lrious to properties in the vicinity. IV. CORRESPONDENLE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in The Dai ly Report newspaper, the property posted, and notices sent to property owmers within 300 feet of the project site. To date, not correspondence has been received either for ,r against this project. ON 11 PLANNING COMMISSION CUP 83 -21 /EN AGAPE January 11, 1934 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning 1 co— nsider all naterial and input regarding this project. such consideration the Commission can support the ' findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the Resolution would be appropriate. Rick mew Cfty fanner i $G:DC:jr Attachments: l .t • ,� r �i r 1_y ..r r �r • 9 h 1 .t • ,� r �i r 1_y ..r r �r • 9 E wf•Ta Iti -.,.T 1 I CITY OF RANCHO C JEAMONGA N,ORrri �� 1119� M- I\ I' u 1� I E pnn.Yr I I' i 1 memo �. n L O O/ P L A r W'� CITY OF RANCM C✓UCANKX AA loll _B : RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMGNGA PLANNING COAIHIISSION ADDITION LOCATED AT USE PERMIT IN THE CHURCH THELOW RESIDENTIAL. ZONE WHEREAS, on the 9th day of November, 1983, a complete application was filed by En Agape Fellowship for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of January, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Co mission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following findings can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. SECTION 3: That Conditional Use Permit No. 83 -21 is approved subject to the following conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Existing mature trees shall be preserved; however, selective branch removal is permitted to facilitate construction. 2. Exterior building materials shall match those of the existing building. 3. The existing prior to r toierfinalshall occupa cremoved of the new property addition. Resolution No. Page 2 ENGINEERING DIVISION 4. Dedicate necessary storm drain easement area for future storm drain to be installed per Tract 12577 from northeast property corner to the Beryl - Hellman storm drain. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Carmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 U 11 6 0 O g 6 d e'c c yob quo a4c a4 J gr c rrus rds° =i ` Y1 J L ! O r U N{ L V V -� y a w _o �✓ ° ✓ P V ^ r P w ^ V y f8 tvj Y r ✓ V� C- 6 !� � � w Yi-z N VLa OrgC �Oq Y�a �jq r3� V^ �N V ✓•Lpr GV CC Z3r `f CVs V nq _Y C °✓ 9 V d� t22 a- ° O O O✓ Y w Z = V 9 G U V C r t 1 L �� ✓ 4 n r G `O � y G s pp _ y n C° V� ^ ^✓ � V Y OWN C10 LNr CO V�'C J V^ a �T'✓ V C O q g V 4� L✓ • -6r PTV \ >O �M� n �JJ �_ w r Oy d° ✓ \6N VC piA�O jLV L.°'C�O gleC C9�G yOL✓ »r 'y4 =Vf.+ ✓O O! rtrf VV V= �A !C ^j DJ C ° O _ \ O y s� l V C �✓ V J y L tO ZZ n V Y L N Y P✓ V✓ w q` O ✓ \. C � r ✓ C P � r V C M _ C O v V y^ O! C O p L Z O L�'d WO'Ciw �4 46p0 ' =� 8 G wCG• M CV M Py M `O N NCi ✓ O.TJ L OC pj ��y LV rC y Cy`9 »�'j� JV✓ Ny �L yRgl CVO r_ pO 8Y py °�L r V O O =Q.M VPN OT�r CPC ^PC n 4 C �qO�N ° ✓V <�n ✓9 V' Of�L 4a 1� Vj NC O gi p�bO ■� ti YD VN V Jr t{ eC � �iN ✓ V� O� C L y�C �6 L<M V r ° O - � ml N I ^i 11 6 0 O g 6 d v J - C ` q V ✓•Lpr GV CC Z3r M � »V� _Y C °✓ 9 5-2 C L II J ✓ v _ 4 m OWN C10 LNr CO • -6r PTV \ >O �M� �JJ � \6N VC C ° O _ \ O y s� l V C �✓ V J y L tO n O O L q` O ✓ \. C � r ✓ C ` 6 V C M C O v y^ p L Z O VPN OT�r CPC ^PC n 4 C d m 9 ° ]••y d c � N + N ` V � yvl � E L•✓ I r Y + N e NEB v _! z o +YYE W° XL 2 G p x NiM v C z V ✓ l C G .o- + C G C `°"C NO yt °Cn W N zr J i° •O x E G� Q✓ C L OOO L' c m c -_ Er E° L C t Er6 M �O P✓ -Y L G CJ 1V V � °C✓ 6 ^ L- Oc� � �V Y +�Cr� iL v L C> V L O Ycy . Va Cc O ° f Ce0> _ V O ° 6 d glgg Eyg + °4 w C`O y +Nl i V__• -L 6 V t Y w P L c - + + O O N V G P V a 4 w n. W N ` L - EpO` L 60 66 O ✓va +c o0 �v + q M .'rL� V��✓ l V- ` Ycf p Y_ � • -• Y Y w i +� O w ✓ O r VCC y0 e- �o�g��aa.N,. >r� 4r•i8i i i O L� CN +d V° C� Fir. +cayc L J W J NLw- P � C LO >•�� L N .V OCO r 2NrrpL -�� �N° O= V n V L V b O e C/ L 2 r c o. v V .-r 9cn ado' V N OOO LZ C'r p o° r C- y✓ y e a L y O V J w d` L WW V !! e C ✓ ° � L r O.i O � e y N V n r q C �S�w�L• a �L� VI 9� �_L •r TL - N O °> Cp r L 1 N 2^ 3 r ° ° 9, Y� L _r- -p c v b- <- �✓ � r • nu �,•- N ru L +v2 Lbn v o'_ =s� -ci `ou =t NdW� ^ q C T`c• < = Gn N_ n M £LOi O Y C ` S `' C G -' -• C L y �, C ✓ L � C N t O.O.. ' N_ O V a V PL2J -• �G C L- N N C sIE O " C V s OC r i J n � i C 4 O P V �° C i• C� O $r y i 2:5 ` 9 V✓ O J_( °r pQ p OW W � O � V ° _ q q M = � V a:r W r0 � � ✓ _ cc V 4 pC C C` a°V+r C am _> "I. C = C Z y r_ V O L T Y b C e W . -• C V r r= C 0 V V C C r 0 Jr4 q a L +y'•v r-S'y aLV V-" Ya- C6T0C -J CLV Q' VOd V 6S - cO w '• •L.• ^ p. 2 c tOJ V O q+ L V O ° C 4 P e M. _O N V V v_ 9 L V M V - O N d C C J _ O J v 7�ro it c� �'j °Lrs_� N NoN -"�msn P CeO �° CLJ P G O rr O � 's r lT J O V + V L V» V M V r 4 r r < -Na N +•O !V Jr°4V1�P� rf C+ t!r!V Vi of C� 2: LI LI VVI J�s C 6 Ci x� 00. Ac C C e� 9 i L _ :m r ° C C _ C V 4 ^ga V •O• u1 < ° PCO� C ^ t0 M V ° N - - J br e ✓ N L v °s W ` P J V • N N e � C N r y y ✓ s _ O c Nr E ) p.GC u Nr �jrV C 2 L V O V - � r C° V r L J+ P n � O Y r� N nI R I E N °CC - L T Cy d t V ✓✓ � O C �� C �� � w Y .Y.. J+ C 6 0 r C t N L _ C. — 4 v .. - r V d C J ee L V q O 2_ 6 r T r 6L L 2 L V✓ - r q 0 Z b j P C �� I S i a i .O � = M• C 4� t� � i _� C C T q _ C. gYrC Q1 VL�rCN .r N C. P ^O w�Y �q° u1 r Y D Y ;!=M O C O N 1 - ° q c -,y d r C N ° 6 O u C 9 V L y C N G O' V S O �_ °✓ V °w q t N b C L� 6 p^ J w C • a pC Di TV r wp q G qC Q'V ycw N r� J SIC N vPe y C CN� PO �Ga1CC q C C n C Y pN 4` 4 a lO > V rYZd ✓ rN V C 6� _P qO.M . O 6N q t.2 u N Y O p T> O •_• V€ V 4 C C r >1 F L Pr C O C PL V C a q L t° V r�r P_q.LiP yy CpV i'pr S[L C q C ✓- $4i ° C i= r 'C CV TVgp 6 C C OTL C CM _P�■ �5O q V q T� q'O ]� °L L p L C G� C Vy� Pq q •�� NG6 J`s '^� c d vc� ^ i+� c�� Qv. n� vP �' � ✓� q.,�- g1 c J C. ` 9 VO j r W « -� t w✓ N` U- - €� C v r Y a a N ` J g 4 6 z 4 C � 1� 1< < O. _ j O V <q � Od <V Dr Y-ND Vr 3 J L•^ O 14 N P .2 .Ca Y -V° V�uL PL - V LL _ q n .- • c- p r c y y o w Q v. v a - .. S EP°4 C O d _r A p rrrw aNa :;� oG�•+ E.'ey a tp �L Npp� a 4 N p g ° Pd E N q q i V Y L —1 C � P 'n 'CrOCN �D Cyr y6 .. 11gV 5— C'p Cq ✓ N` � V — C C L C q> i' g C q C C� N v C ` y am P P O r � O, rC 6 6 O• M >_ C q L ., V Y _ l q 4— q C 6 � N 4 � C O �— d V � q t N C O1 4• Y C N �� Er "� ✓V .di OL_N r > �° _n V'n +ate— °Vp� YLN y" -CCC _ O O° O L � V D� q L• j O C> d L P N O Y O�` N Cq O _ q a_ vL04 yr6 n•��^ _'n: -� NON ar eq M Yw�gOO i� �✓ q VIL 0 N L L N�1 n C q 4 C - ua= -•.Ti G C P` O YL °YO� gCrq Ot °� 't"V ^�O y t q _ Z q 4 V q N✓ NL 10 CC PC =_ LG1= -'>�� -N Cr Nq C. O V C� P �✓ v � ✓ O P � G+ e� 4 a = NY « y p .T y`OL —l] CCU VC iM _ -O %; C>L C OV�S Z q C0YY7YgV oo 6 'nO 7 r V Y J q LLyy ty W C N 3� z U 0 L d C ^� =C N O Vs r C O q G - Y T r 6 V 9 V Y Y L`LC arc N 4 G SV V CL W •C6 • J L r 9 ° �•..c. E 6,f imp 9 N Vr V = r W V W _Cr J o Oe Vy v ^�NR ESQ _ G O O ° =r �O �i aI a • I i •� = O V _�; r � .L. yya bat o c c _c O` E c d f:J • C _H i e Np CC •• i )9 IL `W _e _C _ � e cc ° a �� �� a, ass =;,r 9 =� a • ° � r VO d0 O° 10V _n qs = i G L V L V C pr_ 04. r =mod t�r6 ���� n.°. �. ce °L _`w 'v .^.ti c p NSW Nor vv °•�Z— N.d. Ntw a ••� J t 9• COp�! N do N cc v) 4 i ro te°• U C V ` ox - O cc N nr V N N C �, ° .`` �oL_ _ p p Y V_ 4Cy PL 6C C� ry COW °C Z z n a= V W. < ai ai o : C` r YC r v'9 O C PN TO4 _ 4 Ci VVJ vrn O^ rC -i r4 y � 9`LLr �N pi, �rll�J C 6 -amp N SI pUG WtiL WVt°a �p WU!!) O � O' L40.1WL U�p) <r <aV <VtrO al NI ^i 'i rl NI ^i TI {VI � YI 4'J • I i •� = O V _�; r � .L. yya o c c _c — CC •• i IL `W _e _C _ � e qs = Imo°^ ���� _`w �b+ .^.ti c p NSW N — V ••� J �° r J �~ te°• va NG ne �, ° .`` I COW °C Z z n a= V W. < ai ai o : C` r YC 6n O C Fbp TO4 yJV O Ci VVJ vrn y pn � Y y � iVn L.r PW C^ SI LlVpVa d WW WU!!) O' L40.1WL {VI E `"r tiVC C I N O NJ v a�y- _ cv ry N'SG�`^ �eG dVV V` q• N4J PCm [�OVL V� f..�'~J.�X� i N I 9 V V L 4 0 V V G v C r l Y t r -°• W t I I o w S P�Vm d�� WW�T7� r( O POO �•pppO �'� � I Q N C yer I o ` V w .ry>Ol VC9 rV-' "nL VC = CI C 9 J s .'] V 2 — P p N V d V = y CG O r 0 -O pO VpO PQL 4 V V O w %E L 1 V N V Q f a V N C a O` � O N C ^��CO~ +}� _TCC f:N V I I 1 6 L gG +pp N�P-•V wO NI p� n I I V1 ^OVN VE V 1 C DPOV bra :w - 42. C C °NOY PP p0 rpl V p �♦ p « —fir OV N ^ywx gN -C_VN N =0�RV S O� C � � TV GM {p M V N ~lG�r lr �pa C' . se .0 V C V v b i CVC1 O O Ear I �t J tl i 'v v -n a CV O O O O l V r � C p. V W Lr 4r V y a:5 c >' o° w° ` L 7 4 d a L rI r- G y V VI �� T 64 $I q + L 4 'v v c d - 1 r or d L� L to = d IL` D yyee L V v L ° IIrICY J p V P c i f O O c_ Y pt, O C r O w � r N G l L V M O � c 6 ( V ! d V 0 O C ` S r N Pa -- � °E 4 V dap aqd �r r. N O i � C ° L�o O + c Pc— c b 4 G V r w � ggo �O L + � 4 C C W O- 1. 6wV e N I o = 0 d oE, y Cl d C Jrr CLVv O�S V 2L6f H�LVr r yNy .4i L r Y> N V y r \ L N - _ +r � VL.rr �� rN0 � CC NOUTt OC b PJ_ PL E CCy ry, �dJ9 6p` ��C +Dcc° .W..� ut W r(v VE' L OCr r a V�`PN L 14- P Q V l t rG= u. ` L s— crE� NO i— d �e.yEN.� ruCC � O i yL6V 4 V`'O pC i i L L Py `r 6d� SCC � +� E� +J O +g9 rWE4 OpVV fyda LN � V4 r VVV .2 OC V p y Mpr. +_ tr NOrO NMV per (V 6- V/rr V I- G I- e` 4E_ 6 bob °O.°i dL rCd L�_= dY LV O �...r o = 0 C� z C Y V D ° a' 6 4 D - V C + N + f.� I N =v 3 p i o` O i a O 9 v 4 8� N V r Pr ° D O - _V � L N C N V L c + V O �I 11 d oE, y Cl d C Jrr CLVv O�S V NDr H�LVr r yNy r Y> N V y r \ L N - _ +r � VL.rr �� rN0 � CC NOUTt OC b PJ_ PL E CCy ry, �dJ9 6p` ��C .W..� ut W r(v VE' L OCr r V�`PN L 14- P Q V l t rG= u. ` s— crE� NO i— d �e.yEN.� ruCC � O i yL6V 4 V`'O pC i i L L Py `r 6d� SCC � +� E� +J O +g9 rWE4 OpVV fyda LN � V4 r VVV .2 OC V p y Mpr. +_ tr NOrO NMV per (V 6- V/rr V C� z C Y V D ° a' 6 4 D - V C + N + f.� I N =v 3 p i o` O i a O 9 v 4 8� N V r Pr ° D O - _V � L N C N V L c + V O �I 11 ^� 1 ,I 0 u L d 11 6 r � +- - o .` o.. °or � r• L ny C pnpT O 'L 4A e Cy r V v . V P. prp ra Q C ^ d d y cis d + q r e n� ol GV+ •f �wr C' ��J �r rL 9 —C TT I �� GrUL � i O � OrM < —� V W 0• � G i 6 r 11 E Ll CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT LATE: Janus.: y 11, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, ngineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENAL A:3SESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8250 - DAON CORP. - A ivisron a acres into parce s within u arof the Industrial Specific Plan located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south side of Civic Center Drive (APN 203 - 522- 29 -32) Ref: D. R. 83 -33 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Tentative Parcel Map 8250_ B. Purpose: To d;vide 9.65 acres into 5 parcels with parcel 1 being the site for the development of a 34,754 sq. ft. commercial center on tonight's agenda for review as D. R. 33 -33. C. Location: East side of Haven Avenue, south side of Civic Center, r-ive. D. Parcel Size: Parcel I - 3 45 acres Parcel 2 - 0.95 acres Parcel 3 - 1.30 acres Parcel 4 - 2.37 acres Parcel 5 - 1.08 acres Total T.75 acres E. cx;s�tingzooni�n . Subarea 7 of the Industrial Specific P-,an - Industrial Park. F. Existing Land Use_ Vacant, G. Surrounding Land Use ana zoning: North - site o Law and Jus *_ice Center - Industrial Park South - existing K -Mart Store - Industrial Park East - vacant - Office Professional West - existing office building - Industrial Park. H. General Plan Desiaations: r. Ncrth - ustria] Para South - industrial Park East - Office Professional West - Industrial Park ITEM R PLANNIKa COMMISSION STAFF R'rPORT Environmeral Assessment and Parcel Map 8250 January 11. 1.984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: There are no existing structures within the project area. 0 -site ir:�rovemerts have been constructed under Parcel Map 5205 and are near comvietion. II. ANALYSIS: There are existing driveways on Civic Center Drive located on the property li.tes of Parcel 4 and 5 and on Haven Avenue located on the oroperty lines of Parcel ? and the adjacent property to the south. Reciprocal access agreements for these driveways are recommended and included as Conditi ^n No. 5. The developer has requested a 40 foot driveway on Haven Avenue just north of Parcel 2 and another driveway on Civic Center Drive. Prev'.ousiy when Parcel Map 6617 (encompassing the area of this crap and that of K -Mart) was approved, the City retained the rights of vehicular access on Haven Avenue due to anticipated high volume of traffic. The K -Mart projeut was allowed to have two driveways, one being at the common property line between K -Mart and this project with the understanding that no more driveways would be permitted on Haven Avenue. A proper circulation pattern is available through the interior of the project site and another driveway is not required on Haven Avenue. It is recommended that the Comrission disallow this driveway. Another driveway on Civic Center Drive may be considered at the time final site plan is submitted for the affected lot. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is .art I or the Initial Study as completed by the ap3licant_ Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental the ^klist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon cor]Tletion and review of the Initial Study and field investiga tion, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision.. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has a : :n been completed. V. RECOM+,ENDATION• It is recommended that '.h_ Panning Commission consider all inpTt— anc -elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, tnen adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recow.aerded that a Negative Declarst :on be issued. Respectfuliy sub;aity6d, ts: Map (tentative & vicinity Resolution City Engineer's Report Initial Study J i i i 1 sl t 1 TENTATIVE SHUT 1of1 PARCELWAP NO. 821150 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA low. a wsory z1OR . V [:=7.2.3L• KMRm V asp" w r4Ero4 -D 06[ T1.ff FARE 1 T E Orr10E CFTHE "030 fR Or THE COIRRT O<SV KRw oWo.STaTE a CRLVOM M. OCTCKR.063 LJ. KwrO .0 CaLcLas K wAvS R.C.L 21062 rf (/[rifaw {I� {inw S.I�4 i� il0 � Y[m- yab IN YY�i. J {IlV $HK$tilY ( Sa co...t/cit �u'orrar�rAL Ilpr Y ibt $[abui`w� b Ybil Tf$rtl $/�i/ • v Q` (�bl1w a4(4[ 1C' MI• ��(Y Lfltl [�4 wJ/ [1iClC$ b b ii4Yi tl f4� wi1f4{- Oj (Nl{O iRRly $Y M wig. b 4f�r $rii bY. M•iR- O{l.Rti a' M i.�i wb Y 41 w.'bifY. o�- �'V1I LAiiJ use ai•lb ` F ` 1 a• ` \\ � •. s"fa i.._�t /1 Arses IS = 2 . E` iI \ 1 I zonZO: r -1 LIMO &5z- tcrrClC/AL ii pare% 2 I i to y O ` SOwCO : M-1 j . ' LY.irN w i parcC/ 3 i.Cos TO, oEAc - _ �arq r. t w - 4�b $..m bb• asia{ car aTs +. ur b. (�r[4T {. e. r v z ••[i{r {.r fw n[rt. -a{I {i.w w a.e+ewu N {rbl W - T[i�w OHio{Y r i�v r ear Iw..�.l a bbs•: awwi•�w u. �� N oAc Ic W fTw fw( bi4ir �� •M T.`{N� - MwN Arb• rbl♦ ($iwaiw . - $E{ -/!' Si Y• u•Y •� Tal i.{wb r..ia -..- ba. rr•. bi$r{ �4un� R.bT a�f ©�ti c w.ira 4 Ci —w + H - Y r =Crv,_ CENTER HaC ' J F ` nv Z71 L 57 - /��' .r.l Trii � •� Mix O O � � O � ] �+� 1 . . `J �`O O, j MJ �,r<,,\) fib• Mihrq h a.c O �°D r'ra JAI V. 4A ^ uj; 05 e � < f CITY OF RANCHO CUVAjkIOi,;GA title; 8250 ENGINEERING DIVISION i � VICINITY MAP - - PaSz � 11 E. E RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8250 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8250) LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE, SOUTH SIDE OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8250, submitted by Daon Corporation and consisting of ; parcels, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, south side of Civic Center Drive, being a division of Parcels 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Parcel Map 7007, as per map recorre: in $,,:,k 71, of Parcel Maps, Pages 44 -45, in the Office of the Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, on October 21, 1983, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above - described Tentative Map; and Ww£REAS, on January 11, 1984, the Planning Commission held a duly advertisec .'iblic hearing for ', a above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SEr7TON 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent with the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and imp 3vements will not cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: That this project will not create significant adverse environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on January 11, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8250 is approved subject to the rp-*x=ended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. Resolution No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: 2cret3ry to the arming owissjon I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January, 1983, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: :OMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E L. J RECW4EKDrED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: East side of Haven Avenue, south TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP IQ: 8250 side of Civic Center Drive DATE FILED: 10/21/83 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: being a subdivision of NUMBER OF LOTS: 5 Parcels 1 -4 of Parcel Map 7007 as recorded GROSS ACREAGE: 9.65 in Parcel Map Book 71, Pages 44 -45, records ASSESSOR PARCEL ND:208- 622 -29 thru of San ernar Ino County�aliforma. -1- DEVELOPER OWNER EMGINEER /SURVEYOR Daon Corporation same L. D. King, Inc. 4350 Von Karman, Suite 100 517 N. Euclid Avenue Newport Beach, CA 92660 Ontario, CA 91762 Improvement and dedication requirements in accordance with Title 16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, but may not be limited to, the fallowing: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. Dedications shall be made of all interior street rights -of -way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following, rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on additional feet on additional `eet on 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. X 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: or Haven Avence. X 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring ac-.ess to all parcels and joint maintenance of all common roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided and shall be rezorded concurrent with the map. -1- 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. X ?- Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private proper;-,y. Sarety- _ _ 1- Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for and /or priur to building permit issuance for X 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: median island on Haven Avenue including landscape and irrigation. 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement_ executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of thke Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit or Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and guV er, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, Parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wide pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to recordation for Prior to building permit issuance for Street Name Curb Gutter e- Pvmt.,Walk Dr,ive trees 'Street A. Appr.� Trees Li hts Overlay Med tan ' island* Othe 1 � *includes landscaping and irrigation er meter -2- LI 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -cf -way, — fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's 'lffice, in addition to any other permits required. 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepare: by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. 6. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other =_xisting public utilities as necessary. 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. 9. Street light iccations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with unaerground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation glans shall be submitted to and ® — approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permit. Ii. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Undersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. Drainage and Flood Control X 1. Private drainage easements fcr cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. The following storm drain, shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer _ 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainagE study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- Gradin X 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Unifcrm Buiiding Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grafting plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a G•9alified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3• A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified ergireer or geologist and sut;mitted at the time of application or grading p7 an check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building pernit whichever comes first. x Final grading plans Building and Safety building permit. General F.Suirements and Approvals for each parcel are to be submitted to the Division for approval prior to issuance of X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows., CdlTrde.s for San Bernardino aunty Iuo3--Cc—.tro istrlct _ Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Condi approved by the City Attorney of the map. X 3. Provide all utility services water, electric power, gas constructor. ticns and Restrictions (C.C.&R.$) is required prior to recordation to Pach lot including sewerage, and telephor.! prior to street a- Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamctiga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from Ca7Tran:,!San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have rot been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to z.-y requirements that may be received from them. -4- E El C , 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that. sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. d. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and wee/ control, in accordance with City trail standards, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to recorJation for and /or prior to buildiig pera:4t iSs,:ance or — 4. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. X 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded :naps and deeds used as reference and/or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. -5- CITY OF RASCM CUGMWIGA LLOYD B. NNNBBS, CITY ENGINEER by: 1_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART Z - PR03ECT I,jFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be cc�_pleted and submitted to the Development Review f7onaaittee through the department where the project applicatior, is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Bart II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will mect and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the ?roposed project. PROJECT TITLE: tentative Parcel Map N0. 8250 APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, ,ELEPHONE: Daon Corporation 4356 Vnn carman GuitP i(1(l� NP rsY gParh C6 9?5fi0 _pt+onF • 7141476 -22L5 NAME, ADDRESS, CONCERNING THIS ;17 N_ Euclid AVA TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED PROJECT- L. ottn: D. H. Mays LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADCI'ESS AND ;,SSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FLDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None 7 -i PROJECT DESCRIPTION N ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: Proiect = 43 acres DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS %TREES) , ANIMALS, AN'_' CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTPS, AND TFE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING S ^:'RUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Is the project part of a larger project, Dne of a series Of cumulative actions, whi.:h althouTh individually small, :ray as a whole have .significant environmental impact? This project is part of �he Rancho Cucamonga Business Park project. E I -2 WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO X 1_ Create a substantial change in around contours? X 2. czeate a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? X 3, Create a substantial change in demand for —' municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4_ Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? 5, Remove any existing trees? How many? X o, Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flan - sables or explosives? Explanation of any Y. ?S answers a!Love: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATIOt.: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present 'the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of m=y ability, and rhat the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that addition- %l information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluaticn can be made by the De�v{e'_o %ppme,tt/JReview Committee. Date A G Signature D_ H. Mays Title Branch Maeaaer 1-3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following irforMation should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planrir_7 Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate tl:e proposed res_dential. development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin constructicn: 4. Earliest date of occupancy: Model and # of Tentative S. Bedrooms Price Rarg PHASE I PHASE 2 PEASE 3 Pr.ASE 4 TOTAL I -4 0 n U 11 L. _J CITY 07F RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL MAP 8281: - INTERMETRO N U Ic CORP-- A division of o.82 acres into parcal within t e InUuustriai Specific Plan, Subarea 3 located on the south side of Arrow Highway between Hellman and Helms Avenues -• APN 209 -022 1,2,3, & 4, Ref: D. R. 83 -34 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of Parcel Map 8280. B. Purpose: To merge 4 lots into 1 parcel to remove lot i lines. The construction of an addition to the existing industrial building is on tonight's agenda for approval as D. R. 83 -34. C. Location: South side of Arrow Highway between Helms and Hellman, Avenues. D. Parcel Size: 8.82 acres. E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial - Subarea 3 of the industrial Specific Plan. F. Existing Land Use: Industrial building and a single family home. G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin North - single-family - low 2-4-du/ac South - industrial building - General Industrial East - vacant. - General Industrial West - industrial building - General Industrial. H. General Plan Designations: North - residential 2 -4 du /ac South - general industrial East - general industrial West - general industrial ITEM I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF" REPORT Ervironmenal Assessment and Parcel Map 82810 Jaruary 11, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site consists of 4 lots with an existing industrial bui ding ocated on the corner of Arrow and Helms and an existing single family home fronting on Hellman Avenue. II. ANALYSIS: This m '*p was originally submitted to divide the property into L p' arce'ss. One parcel being the single family house located on Hellman Avenue. Since the future expansion of the industrial facilities will result in the removal of the non - conforming house, the developer has agreed to have 1 parcel. An open channel carrying drainage flows from the north side of Arrow Route runs along the site on Heilman Avenue. A condition to provide a drainage pipe and drainage outlet in place of this open channel recommended. : Helms Avenue and the easterly portion of Arrow Route have previously been constructed to ultimate width. The westerly portion of Arrow Route will be constructed with this Parcel Map. In addition, Hellman Avenue will be widened. Along jith the widening of the east side of Hellman Avenue, an equivalent Portion of the deteriorated west side of Hellman will also be replaced. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Also attached for your review and consideration is Part 1 of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the environmental checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Upon completion and review of the Initial Study and field investigation, Staff found no adverse impacts on the environment as a result of the proposed subdivision. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: Notices of Public Hearing have been sent to surrounding property owners and placed in the Daily Report Newspaper. Posting at the site has also been completed. V_ RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all input and elements of the project. If, after such consideration, the Commission can support the recommended conditions of approval as written in the City Engineer's Report, then adoption of the attached resolution would be appropriate. It is also recommended that a Negative Declaration be issued. Respectfully subtted, LRH :.9K: jaa Attachments: Map (tentative & vicinity) Resolution City Engineer's ?eport Initial Study El 'J 11 El a�a f �_� w•�fn sl_ Ir:J O ,_ O 1V 4 ARROW T uj V _ I a ) I Ac ./L > . e• �c. t co Ac •c {I N t.O ae s! =war_ D1� tn. ! xGSaC �LSrY �/� tJ 2X.11 -STREET - �e « _mss;. I .na +a •' r � I y i pt R.G f y a ►ws Ps 5:` Po.6 i. 1 > xFz uT Pot. i 1� Pir.2 �I t nat ° 3 35t tC B& Ac. t •�t y' '(J'- '• s ac P 0cc2 T' qOK xT.K r Q� , ...y.� 1. ...t, o C�;CA„o = title; RANCHO P.W. 8280 "o- Ni $ _ ENGINEERING DIVISION y VICINITY NIAP 1 nn page s a a s a a a '1- f • • —.7 ! a • ROUTE = O5 mAP9C4-36 -2J MR No L° r; r. +2 Par.. 3 I Par 2 P041 .sy ; i r.72Ac j 43 Ac 3.05-AL f �_� w•�fn sl_ Ir:J O ,_ O 1V 4 ARROW T uj V _ I a ) I Ac ./L > . e• �c. t co Ac •c {I N t.O ae s! =war_ D1� tn. ! xGSaC �LSrY �/� tJ 2X.11 -STREET - �e « _mss;. I .na +a •' r � I y i pt R.G f y a ►ws Ps 5:` Po.6 i. 1 > xFz uT Pot. i 1� Pir.2 �I t nat ° 3 35t tC B& Ac. t •�t y' '(J'- '• s ac P 0cc2 T' qOK xT.K r Q� , ...y.� 1. ...t, o C�;CA„o = title; RANCHO P.W. 8280 "o- Ni $ _ ENGINEERING DIVISION y VICINITY NIAP 1 nn page �+52AC Par _ a 95,Z O5 mAP9C4-36 -2J MR No L° I O6 z i r.72Ac I f �_� w•�fn sl_ Ir:J O ,_ O 1V 4 ARROW T uj V _ I a ) I Ac ./L > . e• �c. t co Ac •c {I N t.O ae s! =war_ D1� tn. ! xGSaC �LSrY �/� tJ 2X.11 -STREET - �e « _mss;. I .na +a •' r � I y i pt R.G f y a ►ws Ps 5:` Po.6 i. 1 > xFz uT Pot. i 1� Pir.2 �I t nat ° 3 35t tC B& Ac. t •�t y' '(J'- '• s ac P 0cc2 T' qOK xT.K r Q� , ...y.� 1. ...t, o C�;CA„o = title; RANCHO P.W. 8280 "o- Ni $ _ ENGINEERING DIVISION y VICINITY NIAP 1 nn page : - . - . - --__— — -- _ ! - -HCL Lsy`}F.V- -- r� —_ _ � "�.•.. � <�<r.r.-�r rri w. .___- 't- .._._i <wr -- —_ 1 ! e' � �• 9 1t is � Id - s- tz }e+ ia•.i . I /��1� '� i aid '\�• •;- 'a �__ tb ai -- t ���� �� --� ; �" �.��5 �: Yt; °:• �•1�~ - ~ �� — 7 'ice \`� Ia: `�.c = °• • ;:L t 1 ••••••••• G,P =EG J`;iaAw ,l:o. 828 " 7E,vr. LOMYOOD FNGiP:EFZMG i= ''�"••" yw ^��< < 3 SURVEYING COMPANY, ING — flfl � ! JC —�f� •S••.. w•wwr •rR Rte• +_ I�rIY �A� +�iIO lr�J� Ari Gir Mr O _ is • — _" — .... - _ ,_. —• 'IJL'C ill, _ ✓= E I tb ai -- t ���� �� --� ; �" �.��5 �: Yt; °:• �•1�~ - ~ �� — 7 'ice \`� Ia: `�.c = °• • ;:L t 1 ••••••••• G,P =EG J`;iaAw ,l:o. 828 " 7E,vr. LOMYOOD FNGiP:EFZMG i= ''�"••" yw ^��< < 3 SURVEYING COMPANY, ING — flfl � ! JC —�f� •S••.. w•wwr •rR Rte• +_ I�rIY �A� +�iIO lr�J� Ari Gir Mr O _ 11 E RES01-UT10y NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 8280 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 8280) LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW HIGHWAY BETWEEN HELLMAN AND HELMS AVENUE WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Number 8280 submitted by Intermetro Industries Corp. and consisting of 1 parcel, located on the south side of Arrow Highway between Hellman and Helms Avenues, being a division of the West 702.00 feet of the North 1j2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 10, Township l South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Meridian; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 1983, a formal application was submitted requesting review of the above- described Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, on January 11, 1984, the Planning Com.4ssion held a duly advertised public h -acing for the above - described map. FOLLOWS: NOW, THEREFORE, THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLVED AS SECTION 1: That the following findings have been made: 1. That the map is consistent With the General Plan. 2. That the improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development. 4. That the proposed subdivision and improvements will no cause substantial environmental damage, public health problems or have adverse affects on abutting property. SECTION 2: 17�at this project will not create significant adverse environmenta impacts and a Negative Declaration is issued on January 11, 1984. SECTION 3: That Tentative Parcel Map No. 8280 is approved subject to the reco"mended Conditions of Approval pertaining thereto. Resolution No. Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING COiiISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: secretary to a anning Commission 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, Passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January. 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSERT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 u L C 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMON&A RECO19WIDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL LOCATION: south side of Arrow Route, TENTATIVE PARCEL NAP N0: 8280 betwe� an and Helms Avenues DATE FILED: 11/10/83 LEGAL DESGfiiPTION: being a division of the NUSBER OF LOTS: I west 702.O0 feet of the 'North 1/2 of the DRm55 ACREAGE: 8.82 Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of ASSESiSOfr fAacCcL lW: 20S- 022 -ant 3 ect ion , T S R ►d, San Bernardino Meridian S I.r a' ► :Jd:7 r a' ENGINEER/SURVEYOR Intermetro Industries same Lockwood Ennineeri_ ng 380 W. Foothill Blvd. 9393 Arrow Hwy. Rancho Cucamonga, CA Rialto CA 92376 improvement and dedication requirements in accordance vut wth Titlot b be e e of the M micipal Code of the City of Rancho Cucamonga include, buv n limited to, the following: Dedications and Vehicular Access 1. all and all easements d 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the following streets: additional feet on zdditional feet on additional feet on X 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City Standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress and egress shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring all common access to all parcels and joint maintenance of shall be provided by C.C.&R,s roads, drives or parking areas and shall be recorded concurrent with the map. -I- 6. All existing easements lying within future right -of -way are to be quitclaimed or delineated on the map per City Engineer's requirements. X 7. Easements for sidewalk for public use shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. Surety X_ 1_ Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of the public improvements prior to recording for Hellman, Arrow and Helms. 2. A lien agreement must be executed prior to recording of the map for the following: 3. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed, guaranteeing completion of all on -site drainage facilites necessary for dewatering all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Divison prior to recording for and /or prior to issuance of building permit for Street Improvements Pursuant to the City of Ranch Cucamonga Municipal Code, Title 16, Section 16.36.120, the subdivider may enter into an agreement and post security with the City guaranteeing the required construction prior to recordation of the map and /or building permit issuance. 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. A minimum of 26 -foot wine pavement within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right -of -way shall be constructed for all half - section streets. X 3. Construct the following missing improvements: Prior to recordation for Arrow, He'lman and Helms Street Name Curb A.. C Gutter Pvmt. I e -1 rive treet i St reet A. Walk j Appr. Trees 1 Lights Overlay Me ian Island* Other Hellman 12" X X X X ' Arrow X mzaderina X ? X Helms I X I *Includes landscaping and irrigation or meter 1. J -2- X 4. Prior to any work being performed in the public right -of -way, fees shall be paid and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. X 5. Street improvement plans shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. X o. Developer shall coordinate, and where necessary, pay for the relocation of any power poles or other existing public utilities as necessary. X 7. Existing lines of 12KV or less fronting the property shall be undergrounded. X 8. Install appropriate street name signs, traffic control signs, striping and markings with locations and types approved by the City Engineer. X 9. Street light locations, as required, are to be approved by the Southern. California Edison Company and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Lights shall be on decorative poles with underground service. X 10. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of ® building permit. X 11. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Jndersidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards. E Drainage and Flood Control 1. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. X 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surfac-z drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. X 3. The following storm drain shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer: a storm drain pipe and outlet structure on Hellman Avenue. X 4. Prior to recordation of the map, a hydrologic and drainage study for the project shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review. 5. A drainage detention basin per City Standards shall be constructed to detain increased runoff -3- Grading X i. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading plan. X_ 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work prior to issuance of building permit. 3. A geological rep rt shall . prepared by d giidi7f7ed engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application or grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Grading Committee and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. X 5. Final grading plans are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building permit. General Requirements and Approvals X 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows: CalTrans for San Bernardino County Flood Control District X Cucamonga County Water District for sewer and water San Bernardino County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) Other 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (C.C.&R.$) approved by the City Attorney is required prior to recordation of the ma.o. x 3. Provide all utility services to each lot including sewerage, water, electric power, gas and telephone prior to street constructon. X 4. Sanitary sewer and water systems shall be designed to Cucamonga County Water District standards. A letter of acceptance is required. 5. This subdivision shall be subject to conditions of approval from CalTrans /San Bernardino County Flood Control District. X 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. —4- y, 7. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits are requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not by issued unless said certification is received in writing. 8. Local and Master Planned Trails shall be provided in accordance with the Trail Plan. A detailed trail plan indicating widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing and weed control, in accordance with City trail stanch prior be submitted to and approved by the City recordation f -r and /or prior to building permit issuance Tor 9. Prior to recording, a deposit shall be posted witn the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District 82 -1 among the newly created parcels. 10. At the time of final map submittal, the following shall be submitted: Title Report, traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and /or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. X 11. Existing P.C.C. pavement ® street shall be removed pavenent a minimum of subject to credit towat reimbursement by City. on Hellman Avenue beyond centerline of and be replaced with asphalt concrete 6 inches thick. This work will be •ds Systems Development fees or other X 12. The curb outlet of the existing storm drain along Hellman Avenue shall be widened to accommodate all outflows from the existing storm drain structures. CITY OF RANCHO Cl►VAiONGA LLOYD S. HUBBS, CITY ENGINEER ® by: -5- Jr. 4 -� E CITY OF RANCHO CJCAMONG.•, ' INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFOP- MATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be cotpleted and Submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is :wade. Upon receipt of this application, the Envirc:smental Analysis st"ff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental irpact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Factory and Warehouse Addition 14410 BZe� APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELIT,PHONE: rnronratinn_ 9393 Arrow Highway, Rancho Cucar NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Douglas R. Dean, 1519 West D LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 9393 Arrow Highway. Rancho Cucamonga CA LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSAIt. FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None I -1 f s PROJECT DESCR-�PTT -ON OF 90' ;; 331' addition to existing factory P_CREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE OE STING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 4 nnv,plc DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES)r ANIMALS, ' `NY CULTURk , HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE '(ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): C, Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environnental impact? No. We will continue land use as it has been used in the past. I -2 i E E WILL. THIS ?P.DJECT: YES NO 1. Create a substantial change in groand -�- contours-' X 2. Create.a substantial change i:L existing noise or vibration? X 3. Create a substantial change in demana "or municip =l services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X S. Remove any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: I.MPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, comalete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my kncaledge and belief. I further understand that additional - irfcrmation may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. n r o ) -� Date �':r'trt�� �1 i�37 Signature . �-< Title Manager, (ganufac�Fnainaorinn is le 1-3 Ll 11 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1984 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lloyd B. Hubbs, City Engineer BY: Shintu Bose, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO TENTATIVE TRACTS 12364 AND 1236 Located on the south side of ase Line, Channel. A change of design from 71 lots t 0 family detached homes 4 -1 - LEWIS HOMES - east of Deer Creek 72 lots for single The subject tract maps were approved b- the Commission as a total residential development of 71 single family, detached homes on June -2, 1983. The original design of the map provided the entry road to the project at mid -point along the westerly tract boundary off Spruce Street. Since that time, the developer's engineer has found that this type of design does not provide for a satisfactory drainage outlet from the project since the natur -,1 ground drains southerly and southwesterly. The developer is row proposing, to redesign the map by providing the entry road along the south tract boundary to improve the tract drainage. However, this revision has resulted in ivicreasing the number of lots from 71 to 72 lots. The City's Subdivision. Ordinance requires Planning Commission approval of all increases in lot number. So this is being presented to you for your review and approval tonight. RECOMMENDATION: It :s recommended that the revision to the tentative maps be approved and if the Commission agrees, a resolution has been prepared providing fo: the chang! and retaining the original Londitions of approval and environmental clearan,'_. Respectfully submi LBH UB: j as Attachments: Proposed Map Previously Approved Map Resolution 83 -84 Resolution Approving Revised Map ITEM J r L A 0 � a t t T •�` � _ _ � i = 'vb•: J . a it i l i I ,I' 1 ♦ I 1( y a 1 1 t O w aC�9x O � t� :wig C Cri t r Lewis e t i Ci —wa a 1� ik iFF'� — 7MEs vwe r -•• xsr .3:a -s M Y 1. a o iaF ti Ii YYYY = A A ' LEY 2 O e." Y a x a! 0 W ebb G. Me mom C 11 Ll r- — 7MEs vwe r -•• xsr .3:a -s G. Me mom C 11 Ll u E; - i r •w lirj wr . �x p �t i ellp �113 1� I r,_ r Ci1 _ i! :A. 3 r SO 9' -jp = ;ai i w IL q Ai tA role a n ISSO > L 1 � �i p n � ! A • i ,i \_ s -; + i i fit:. i i 1i t• -- = ail n a a 0 > €-P r �I Y i It .. a a L ; I• li � bjK i I 1\i} f eWE AM I ml i& e � { a' rp s eiEi - i : a� . 1 i a'� 1���SA Y� i iii' cj aa] a a to i P ` 'Y a u M Z q� a o 1— c lji,E�s i i tn 1tBa iiii , j a g J=' y�� _ al a !� e ■ J� > ' i •: ='x � e l J � `i � � E'ai ■ > j t y I i • . S u 11 E. E RESOLUTION NO. 83 -84 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12364 & 12364 -1 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12364 & 12364 -1, hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated ir. the City of Rancho Cucamonga,` County of^�anQBernardino, State o California, described as a r- sidential suudivis oa o lard into 71 lots, regularly came br_fore the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on June 22, 111'83; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Division's reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City o Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 12364 & 123641 and the Map thereof: with all (a) ppli able interim tract and proposed general and specific plans; (b) Tne design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public h %al`_h problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement forc access by the h public use of large, the now of record, 9 property within the proposed subdivision. Resolution No. 83 -8f Page 2 (g) That this project will the environment and issued. 6' not create adverse impacts on a Negative Declaration is SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 12364 & 12364 -1, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING PLANNING DIVISION 1. All flag iot front yards shall be landscaped and irrigated by the developer. Details shall be included in the detailed landscape and irrigation plans. 7 Whenever the regulations of the Terra Vista Community Plan differ from the standard conditions, the Community Plan regulations shall supersede those of the standard conditions. 3. Additional architectural treatment shall oe provided on the corner side elevation on lot 26 and on the side and rear elevations of lot 7. Details shall be included in the final construction olans. ENGINEERING DIVISION 1. Prior to recordation., a Notice of Intention to farm and /or join landscape and lighting districts or other maintenance entity acceptable to the City engineer shall be filed with the City Council. The engineer costs involved in the forration of the district or other vehicle shall be borne by the developer. This shall include maintenance of perimeter landscape parkways. 2. A drainage easement shall be required and recorded along with the Final Map. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 1933. SSION,OF -Tf-E CITY Qr RANCHO C'JCAtimo, ;CA 8Y • J .tit rman Re:. el,_ ATTEST: 1 or r ng Co.. m, i ss '"J IJ Ll CJ E-1 Resolution No. 83 -84 Page 3 1, I, JACK LAM, Secretary of t Cucamonga, do hereby certify regularly introduced, passed, C;ty of Rancho Cucamonga, at a the 22nd a_y of Jung 1983, AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ie Planning Commission of the City of Rancho that the foregoing Resolution was duly and and adopted by the Planning Commission of the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held by the following vote -to -wit: MCNIEL, BARKER, JUAREZ, P,EMPEL NONE STOUT rs.P OP- -V>• �00 � DJ J OrC r q 2. • P- C C C V V G O D V 1 < 'S � .O � �- 6U C q Dom' T.r L.•• V�� .rC _ qL_ p� O Cq Gp ~ ^_ -ri �� �mOV 4 qS' C ^J •n L. Yrp C _ rf d9i �d 4 Lbw' a•O r { �d >J� pr Yr>dY00y �€+ V YO V OJ-� OV�C 9 q� �6D 6 Or -Y'J -u V° °c r wooe- r d '^pw :.cw q -7 �`rD v C j -o� Cr— oc ~VC d.•. °O Ow� p � -O Ot~ qN f4 VC S.�D TOr C 9V °PLC C r = O O J OV•^ g0 OOr �bY Ca O --. q O V rYYO -LZ OO O rPV d PLC Y Vr C -Nfl -.na■ r_r� r 6YV t =- J� w•1= PV Yf r CC y`Yy Vr �� POD �'•f'• % �Vr YpG 9= V -J GP�Vr arC - -S.r _. •L.r r .[Oa qJ 1Cq= y 9 Lr 6YD <epG O. <wL t} !. 1`.m •CG r6•n -wp -L w0 J'1q �J is iL C O q ° _ V V O �eI1, \11,\� � {O w� V�� `� CQrO j`= lfTYl V p•En 0 o VI ' Zt =0r Per n ~� •Oi: 9y� _V�� C�J E 7;.0, _r P `i '� �C V ~Y.O•rb -O _ •CL C1 �.'fL O. O^ � -3 rl z � \ \• \ 7 rO e z = lI I f li try � � �".7 � Y� o L em '.. •� .fin re Ya S r P 4 'J } I i � rJ r- G C 2_� •I O • 1 � � '� y 7 y G Y � I y r L •" G r O G v l G +• a e f O S r N Y 1 V= C Crn L7rr jN y2 !7 > nr._ V -J dq y_ GR? V 0 =�6J _CC rd�G �V 3 � do ZY �3vq �G p0 lI r �G� c° d y =Y � ii•. -L � =- now � c oo- -•• -.�".L •^� o cr ` j _ �� ��'vL "' -, j sG OI O �''i 7'y O NOv �O7 NO 00 ._n —t =C7 }Oy _ 01 �I ` � �O 1 \ \. \• \J1 u = � YL JA — w� �r _~ O C7_i•ry L � _a OJT. -_ =VT - V _� �•\l O _ r w C r r _ Y a= ,��.^]i > = — q 2 =. C y f n V O. '- ��4.10 _�_J n 9 M.yi. �-r_ G •-i � 'J 'J ��0 . T� >C .� C •/� _ _ _ _ a _ _ `J O S ' C O •; o O o o q L r E r 'S r _ r 1 � j ' c r __ _ � 9 c =- c e>_ v ` _ _ y O -_l . � E T 6 1� C O r O P_ _ � _� � •�'1 y cC _ _ — ._.�<� �.•. � N J' y 1 C n0 r S �• O .n 4 s i � � C '[ - r � G_ G 9 * O try a c _ K �� r y i r �� O V d j= L P q w s • L — b C_ - C y a < L._ V� O OrOC w0 OG •yi N ^ ► \^( °3 �YV9 Vq�r4 V =Q po SJ 'n L °c'n 'C °- °L•.� o_o rL �dtCV `n =�_cM rPC Cr v r t cq r p `LVN �LCO e. _r o Y E r n c V O V L 3 r C O • V_ J d >r c w u V n �— V C n � L•] r n� C �11L1i 6b9�'^ VC7 CL Ly C 1L- Orb= = T fj ��6Lr � r r E Y r= r °� u 7 "+ r O • q G r i C r =` G_ P � i Y b� M Y V ° i i V r O Off¢• t y O V V L T w C r '^LOO 4C 4 � O•rr>C p OAS .^� _ _ O + —uP CCG iV •C L 6 v�"^a L ° • �+ ri LYa Y 0 - or =c -v Ji L - °c .. ° °E acv° rL � nc y. • Yam° °� =P�° • -S- L..�-��s. +- �`ic "v V�� .. a. o`` -'u.. •v.°.b o�a_- J�`o°'aL =ea]r �`_ °�` _'^u s°J�° 1 � r�L.r - '^^_^' Est= u• -o� ° rc c o• °u_ - r< <I _ o� _ J_ w ./. c< - .].r c dim � +� �— ur • P L i w �+ 2— �� r u i I < O .n 6 r < u r y .n r O w ° 7 O r 1 I �1 1 Cf � p y J� r d y- O C Z a? r r J• V O -� y = � V L r O M L C V O r•�O C min• .r. =�e r c c °v= °u �.. {pJa ° . Y. rd it gip~ O C ]`V•J r —r CCr_J V+ o �• O Q L -s S O r r -�] _ u 4 __ ) -� c F J_ 7` _ r J •1 Ga f� G V_ � ZZ G V° rL r Cu C.J ~S L O _ V Lu V_•.r OL S_ r - - Y - _ ] v r c r - _ ^err _ ° oc � � $ • .-'. - a] f 4 O / V y Y� � l C r � a r r 9< i C � ` O L� M• 3 -UGC rI _ r w u'J Yr� � a_ "'� >� O +IYL •O °Y vYI'Y -• y> ` I - ? ] 'V P O �, 'J ^I V� 4 L b L u r C V r 1 C L� i co-J e � b a a W 1; � � . � qdv rV� per VaV C_r Pin• -y. = =�+ P- �% �: u u a +v ryv u °_ca vN� QP =� rF rV V`3 p•q o -: rnM-.G OOOS � 6r u.`na��`� a C VS ' O� v Vaa __ YC l .rr _ d_ b_ 72 3 q O •- G J .� V? j > C y -- as O +O r'c•co P +..ji 7�_ - Se i3 �> °1 s.O.�r fib_ 7= W �0 G _ V _ C V i Y O V � •- p O t ` nr O� V w Z' O� M�. __ w ` J p q Y.J •' g L J •J -J O•> C r •n r l + �• O L_ < C +� G =Vr r -_L + �I PC �� O`+•l GV P1 Vim• �yC� -•Pr yP VOVCP ul CC a1V_` .>.r q_ r r Ou TT C 1 L Oi - _ G 9 V w- M`r^ yC� ` '� L J O. L1 r N ✓O. VV• +. +a0 $n�E�� -J rmaC a�0 a SO VO Pq Z• O) ijjj� va - N1 �: r q N O •i J 0• VI � <� <PU <Va0 < 1 G V O Y i• 100 Gi _1 •y r Lo CI � VI u' r W 1; aL1C r. = n d? f_t OO QP =� rV V`3 o -: rnM-.G OOOS � 6r a C VS ' O� v Vaa __ YC l .rr _ d_ b_ 72 as r'c•co P +..ji 7�_ - Se i3 �> °1 s.O.�r fib_ 7= W �0 +� G =Vr r -_L + �I O`+•l -O yP P` P a1V_` TT C 1 L - ..� i .• - _ G 9 V w- Z z ZL �� V r L J O. L1 r N i- n� G - N1 �: r N O •i J 0• VI � Lo W 1; —I�• I I I < °r r_ -9_n-j '✓6 �'I ~� VL __P✓ Ca � I Vi-J• q>O� n0 —D a VrL— ..° cx V q I I • ' =lam � =)U= a ^Ye °6 �G �`U� —` dL = aan Gird ca.G/ Tr CV. i + c 7 i d a. �. �� I L +•= rte.°. =+o v'+o3o «+ i= .`.r ..��u sc vo` ��. III u 3 I I �'�7 �'L =•4 � c C -:�� �` Qom` i a ` _ ° L 3•� r• � I �_ U_ a =` r J G L= 7� r Q SR o - ` I Ll- C r� r{ E •+ r � _ u _ r V C O C - O - .b. b`a r G •. i � � w W < C L p n a •, ° c a JwO - 61_ a - wo { AO wl O'�-1 - 0_V• t_w OI 1p <6 pr -4 ¢1 I 1 u`i 1 1 a Y r r � V _l n'•- ;ro Y - 6 c °`r °cam c �° �... S v i Su_• � < ILI r s(Fl•' b � V 0 V •r Ga � � r - _ _a _ _ ^ I -I •..I �- � w Y_ O.`-• CYO ;i1 1 VC .J r_J �v 1 �f.s 'T• ° �� __ Ii y _}u Q `M1 P V =fir I +I v0 <6w .Cn�e Iw • I I ° C < �.J Iri I <r p } G. IV /• 1 � G 1 m T rI N � � • ��,� i I i I j 1i j � �j �I � 4 Ll- C E 13 RESILUTION NO. 83 -84A A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12364 AND 12364 -1 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 12364 and 12364 -1 hereinafter "Map" submitted by Lewis Homes, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a residential subdivision of 14.4 acres of lard into into 72 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and acticn on January 11, 1984; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Division's reports; and WHEREAS, said map was conditionally approved by Resolution No. 83 -84 on June 22, .983, said conditions remain unchanged and in effect. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resclve as follows: SECTION 1: The Planning Commission approves the revisions of the map based on thee 7 wing findings: (a) The final map is consiste,.t with the General Plan and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The final map is not like'~' to cause serious public health problems; (f) The design of the final map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. (g) The environmental impact findings in Resolution No. 83 -84 apply to this map. SECTION 2: The Planning Ca-mnission approves the revision to the final map aTinds that all conditions contained in Resolution No. 83 -84 for the tentative approval shall remain in full force and effect. Resolution Nj. 83 -84A Page 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary to the Pianning Commission I, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning L xMission held on the 11th day of January, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: E 1 11 •J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Michael Vairin, Senior Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE L.odde, litie 17 of the Municipal Code, amending Section 17.08,040 -5 and 17.08.040 -C to require a Conditional Use Permit for single family detached dwellings less than 90C square feet. BACKGROUND: During the review and adoption of the Development Code, the Council adUed a minimwr dwelling unit size of 900 square feet for all single family detached dwellings. After the adoption of the Code, the City Council directed staff to prepare an amendment to the Code which would require the approval of a Conditional Use Pe -:.,it for single family detached dwellings less than 900 square fee:. Therefore, staff is bringing forward this amendment to the Pla):ring Commission to conduct the required public hearing and to forward a recommendation to the City Council. ANALYSIS: In review of a Conditional Use Permit for a development with dwellings less than 900 square feet, the same Conditional Use Permit procedures and findings in Section 17.04 of the Development Code would be used in evaluating any future proposals. Thypically, the use must be in accordance with the objectives of the General Plan and Development Code and with the purposes of the area and district in which the site is located. Also, this analysis would take into consideration that the proposed use with conditions would not be decrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other properties or improvements in the vicinity. In review of the housing objectives within the General Plan and Development Code to provide for a variety of housing, housing needs, and energy efficient housing, this amendment would be consistent with the objectives of providing more flexibility in housing products. ITEM K PLANNING COM9NISSION STAFF REPORT Development Code Amendment 84 -01 January 11, 1984 Page 2 RECOM9+lENDATION: ?t is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive publi: input. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, it is recommended that the Planning Commission consider all aspects of this amendment and to consider the Resolution provided within this report. Respe tf lly ye pitted, Rid Gone City Planner RG:MV�jr Pttachnents: Resolution of Approval Proposed Ordinance 11 C 11 L 11 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 17, 01APTER 17.08, TABLES 17.08.040 -B AND C, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE, TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS LESS THAN 900 SQUARE FEET The City council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Califorria, does ordain as fn110ds: SECTION 1: Table 17.08.040 -8 is amended to require a Conditional Use Permit for sine family detached dwellings less than 900 square feet within the VL, L, and LM Cistricts, as shown in attached Exhibit "A ". SECTION 2: Table 17.08.040 -C is amended to require a Conditional Use Permit for she family detached dwellings less than 900 square feet within the L, LM, and !M Districts, as shown in attac" _1 Exhibit "B ". SECTION 3: The City Council finds that this amendment will not cause significant adverse impacts upon the environment and hereby issues a Negative Declaration. SECTION 4: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk ® shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Daily Re art a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of�ntaria, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this day of 19 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: n . Mi a s, Mayor ATTEST: Lauren M. Wasserman, City Clerk kep EXHIBIT "B" TO ORDINANCE 211 -,A TABLE 17.0&040 -C OPTIONAL DEvRLOPmENT STANDARD6 CKM - I s lav*ew L Lr r � a aft Am SAC SAC N,R KrldmOwt N/A Ni R (m -mu (m=-mum Vlt8tta; r0q;;iTd to angle family >w.e' .ti+luon N,rp. ttn) N/ R vmft* Up t° D to DP to (permitted iof par aag 8 up xo L' t° D =w-num Dweang {Bt in 14 ^' Single c, fatmey dtrtae3uit7 OrtOittp ally 8p� tat D)wwahw, Nuumum Width VOrIKU00 tegwred to angle family a:tomewaa NIX C !root Ni R soma -lv MM =M Dgtn Veriabat r8QWre c C to angle family ametstota N/R = N; R 1�w Street (aeerge, min.) 3C -5 ZD 'Se ]0.25 30125 35.30 Fneate Street 20e Se 5 e l.c -unle. out no 5e 5e Law Men) At lntrt°r Sate 8nundary 20:5 15,'5 SC 20C; Sd 29C SC (Dreg: ng -ntt: Acoeypry Bldg.) Ree'dostitl � � ° 4 2$ 25 N R Otn.: 10 N R R ealtlft LaiLUma 35 10 N -R N'R N R Open sca a a—q__ __ _ 35 35° ape 55 c Frt•ate Open Space 1 cmunC Floor 1000'N'R 300'150 225;150 150:100 150 100 Lpper. Story :n:U common. Open SPatee 5% 5 ISa tmsmum !l 35b 35b twle Open Spaeee 80% a0b (Pri-ate anc common) 40% 40% 4" RaeatSm Anellanlm N: R Regw :eC a Purua:t to Seetlm R pron Taed Lasompme � Reeutred pursuant to Se^ -t:or. 1- : .,•8.040 -F Raw" Pesurt to Seaton 27.01.040 -E Ciaws" mm N/R P*qW eo Pursuant m Sacuon 1'.08.040 -H e. EICWUtg uww memory far ftowdW7 MWU a W art artals. D. s As me weC from ultimate rtGtefvay lma. Refer to Tame 1'.01.045 -D for attytione; asaas information. e. Lmtt May ettmn 50 feat of VL or L Dawict a' Add 10 feet S 800e01 t to VL. L or Lit distrim e. Lays LLa 18 fen from twmc of adaeallt raCtatea automaua garage Cote opener. Prmner lannelpm and mtartor tat•aet trees_ g. A mole faro W btaeMe bratl.r� t nsn 9 - feet tea] permit our 8aenan lf_aa_ ale 11 u E U E ''I EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE 211 -A TABLE jTjmA40-B BASIC DEVZLOPKENT STAKDARI)S mhos. ae seol' 0 a. L La r as a Ida Yea 999egfe::� rams dw deel�rte� Caner SSde Yoe' t3 Nydmum Not Average S..SOO 9A00 0400 MIR N/• MIR et0emum Net 20400 7.200 SAN 10.000 MIR N. R mmbw of Dsem9tg awe Up to Up to Up to Up to Up to Up to (pe•mttted p r acre) 2 e 9 11 19 .. NUA58 a Aeel9t am am 304v9. 23av9- 20av9- 25er9. [emDf h'JCME � �,,,,__ a 999egfe::� rams dw deel�rte� Caner SSde Yoe' t3 15 tat Dleie�eaa 15 N/R lnznm Side Ywd 10:15 NLtiaum Width OQev9. 9Sev9. 4sm. SO a mqm front tetLoet) veytlO .ar725 vwytS N,R M:u. awher 101 e:tdth loo 70 50 93 Kcumum depth ISO too 90 too V=mu0. frontage so 40 30 90 (N front property Una) Upper mtary Un1U Nmu aft lot ftentasc 30 20 20 30 (Q front pr000rt7 line) (Ilimmum v mommoloc" 33% 35% 35% (Prrrate Q Common) MIR N/R MIR MIR MIR MIR Front Ye.el 304v9. 23av9- 20av9- 25er9. NiR varyt5 vary45 rams va Caner SSde Yoe' t3 15 10 15 N/R lnznm Side Ywd 10:15 S'IC 5 100 N/R Rear Yard 30 20 1s 100 N,R Rtvate St..", 2S1 20t tot St so (ra^Jplt. out tro Mote type) Spate 2000.'N: R 3000, N R 300 ISO =S. ISO I'm Ulna) ISO 100 (Ground PIWI N 1 N/R Wit MIR 14/R N'R N,R MIR So At Interior 30:5 20:5 1515 350.'SO Ise'sd 150: Sd site Boundary (D.OUmg L'mt. AteewOry 849-) Somatolmow Front to Front N: R N . a 2S 30 30 3' Other NA N R 13 _ is i_ /S It lisitatt.a 35 35 35 35f e0f 55f y tG„oroce 2596 40% 504b 50% 50% 50% (Naamum %) Fire 1ewffite Mote type) Spate 2000.'N: R 3000, N R 300 ISO =S. ISO 150,100 ISO 100 (Ground PIWI Upper mtary Un1U Common opwt Specea MIR N. 'R N; R 30% 30% 30% (Ilimmum v U— open mpeRa 65% 90gb 40'L 33% 35% 35% (Prrrate Q Common) Rawasom Armeffawaft Milt N :R N R Regwted per Sec- 17.00.010 -G 1ammmom 9 9 9 Regw!. c per see. 17.09.04C -F a. fi iumn9 lend mWealwY IN eeaaedeli eQoota end et".erfal5• am. AS 10eawc05 from WUmeta r4htof +ey +w. e. vw3abw from yard aUoeed pwstent to swum 17.00.090-M d. Ado 10 feet tf td3W '. to VL. L or LN dtsVret. e. i/ them I9 feet from beer Cf adevew regeree wltmmatle swage door apelMri. I. Limit t fta7 erUem SO fen Of YL or L Dome) y ►tyacater lets ee9 mute• 6rmet Vas& foot ww maLwe m tea 700 Um avowal of a Cadxtww RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 84 -01 TO REQUIRE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DWELLINGS LESS THAN 900 SQUARE FEET WHEREAS, on the 7th day of December, 1983, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 211, the Development Code. and directed staff to prepare said amendment: and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of January, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the above - described amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission recommends to the City Lou�nci adoption of Development code Amendment No. 84 -01, described as follows: 1. Table 17.08.040 -3 of Title 17, Chapter 17.08, The Development Code, be amended to add a footnote on Is the single family detached dwelling, under the VL, L, and LM Districts, to require a Conditional Use Permit for dwellings less than 900 square feet. 2. Table 17.08.040 -C of Title 17, Chapter 17.08, The Development Code, be amended to add a footnote on the single family detached dwelling, under the L, LM and M Districts, to require a Conditional Use Permit for dwellings less than 900 square feet. SECTION 2: That this project will n:,t: create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is recommended. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: Ll I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho CL, .=ga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the llt!- day of January, 1984, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMISSIONERS: NOES: COWISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: r U E 40 El- E CITY OF RANCHO CiiCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1.984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner �.._+ �+ assnriate Planner BY : Cur a w:-hnS ....., SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10035 - RH ASSOCIATES - A residentia subdivision of 1 acres of land in the 38 custom lots in the Low District (2 -4 du /ac), located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207- 101 -37 and 207 - 092 -10. I. BACKGROUND: This tract was originally approved for '.2 months on Marc 1981 and subsequently granted an eighteen (18) month extension by the Planning Commission on January 13, 1982. The applicant requested a final eighteen (18) month extension on August 10, 1983. At that time several concerns were brought up regarding the project design and access to adjacent properties (Parcel 13, Exhibit "D") and this item was continued to the September 14, 1983 meeting to allow the applicant to respond to the Commission's concerns. At the September 14 meeting the Planning Commission approved a 120 -day time extension and directed •`e applicant to provide a study to analyze the alternatives for at-cess to the area south of Tract 10035. II. ANALYSIS: The applicant's engineer submitted two alternative access layouts to Parcel 13 (Exhibit "D") as shown on Exhibits "E & F ". They are as follows: Alternative 1: Provides a street throuah lots 2 and 3. Due to the slope of the property at this point construction of the road would necessitate about 60 feet of fill where the road crosses a ravine and creates a 75 -foot high 2:1 slope. Approximately 300 linear feet of storm drain would be necessary to allow drainage to pass down the ravine. The street g-zde of this road would be approximately 12% maximum. At the southern tract map boundary the street would be elevated 8 feet above natural grade requiring excess grading on the property to the south. Alternative 2: Parallels Camino Pereera, the proposed street, and passes through 9 lets with a street grade of approximately 10%. This alternative in effect would eliminate approximately 6 lots and require ITEM L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF oGPORT Time Extension - ra 100?o /RH Associates January 11, 1984 Page 2 fill slopes of 25 -30 feet high along the downhill side of the new street, and retaining walls up to 11 feet along the uphill side of the new street. Both of the above alternatives will provide access to Parcel 13; however, neither alternative considers previous Planning Commission concerns regarding preservation of the natural terrain because of the considerable amount of cut and fill required tc construct the new roads. The original conditions of approval attempt to mitigate this concern by requiring a minimum of grading on individual lots and construction of split level housing designs with raised foundations. IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission Pursue either of the two options: 1. Grant a time extension to the Tentative Tract Map as originally approved for the fifteen (15) months remaining of the four year maximum. A Resolution of approval is provided should the Commission decide to grant the extension; or, 2. Deny the extension request. With this option the map will expire on January 25, 1984. A new application would then have to be processed through the Res ; dential /Growth Management Review System in order to develop the property. ReSAct5l l,y si bmitted, R I CK/G City P RG /CJ /kep Attachments: Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Original Planning 1983 "A" - Location Map "B" - Zonino and General Plan "C" - Tract Map "D" - Assessor's Parcel "E" - Alternative 1 "F" - Alterntive 2 Resolution of Approval Commission Minutes - Map with Conditions Spetmeber 14 & August 10, Time Extension Resolution of Approval I E �. p/ ... �/. .. .r / ^'.; � Z®NNING rca =nw. � PLAN 1a 16.v,%'r.fihL Golf Foothill s � e - _Vrm V1� 1�CM H L.I.] E CITY OF MEN I -!= I =c 0 RAl1'CHO CUCATMa ' " TrrLE: ZZWIWA2 PLAT*J U,%U M-ISM EXHIBED dose //' 4 y I - ',roc✓ �= � ��/�' r / . / + . ., • �. • j i NORTH CITY OF EXTEkdSltrAI RANCHO CUCAiVKIN,,,ji 'I'I7'L•E: "Rrj.[r ilc�T mw FLANNIiNG DIVSK N EXIHIBfT: u Ga SCAL.E- t S '- a \c s nz = sx C \eVi M ` Y6 _ O \-J, 7 Vi i Ix 6r wY = Ow z � Ft ;� \I—, i f El 4 \ 11 - jN s s r 1 � s V p t _ 1 L Y T'• nic tis • .j ol C<p� .o \_' fA —4��r • 4 - jN s s r 1 � s V p t _ 1 L Y T'• nic tis • .j ol C<p� .o \_' fA —4��r 1 [�P. IOC- ,_ ••�'�i/� IjY a 5 '�ca tf � S .IC For S.E. 114 SE 114 Sec. T IS R 7W SSB am. 51 moo'' .3 i4 I l�3 i \�I Por Red ,d. Sub Z-1wo 2V33 Par C.�. cm. ga Fruit Lar4s M8 4/9 Par c:xarc -V v wyOrd Su-ft a MB 2OA5 Rene Tax R 4 L5011,15012 cws vn 7p%. 40 f fp '•�_ 1 '�i! j '� �• nSs; 2 r x f.. . 7 1: • �crF n J _ 21 Assessor': htw- ASse=Ors Sk 6 Lot Book 207 Nome Shmn in circlw son Bern NORTH CITE' OF MEND T fs ]RANCHO CLC,AII'IONCA r _gyp A4*00 PL.ANNNG DIIVNOLN Ex;mm. " SCALE - I' L "I i a��`• —T ' v v ij 6EGTIGN A -A SCd' L M°GR • • 4V. VGGT C -27' / / I r L� f , • '40 1 `9 NORTH ® CFrY QF uc ia PL ?4M DIV19JN EXHIBIT Or--]* SCALE: - I "- - ; ..�. a / ix ZZ 2 � w �f Lb 1 O 4 GCT.O'a ♦ —� w. • -v ego nfo n CITY OF RANCUO CI)CANUSTCA PLANNING DIVNON TMNJ. -T--J Iccrss Trru. 4'L- £XHIBrr- `� -1' SCALE: ♦ P z i L I 1 � /• � ar �r k / or r t.. �y o 1 01 L \ do F �- - ����' � ' � ' -' -r ,-� _ '�• fir\ , -' 0 RESOLUTION NO. 81 -34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10035 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10035, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The Developers, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot subdivision of 15.7 acres of land in the R -1 -12 zone, located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207 - 101 -37 and 207- 092 -10 into 38 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 25, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECT TON 1: The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard Fo Tentative Tract No. 10035 and the Map thereof: (a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; (c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; (d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; (e) The tentative tract is not likely health problems; (f) The design of the tentative tract any easement acquired by the publ record, for access through or use the proposed subdivision. to cause serious public will not conflict with is at large, now of of the property within rdye L i,) That this project gill not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10035, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. Prior to final map recordation, appropriate provisions shall be made for the disposition and /or maintenance of areas adjacent to the two existing single family residences on Red Hill Country Club Drive which are not needed for right -of -way p,:rposes. Such provisions shall be approved by th,e City Engineer and the City Planner. 2. :f this tract is to be developed as a custom lot subdivision, the precise design and placement of all structures on all lots shall be subject to approval by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of Building Permits. ?opropriate restrictions to this effect shall be recorded along with the final map. 3. The Building Official shall critically review the structural integrity of each unit in this tra t as it relates to seismic safety. If, in the opinion of the Building Official, additional structural elements are needed, then they shall be so required. ENGINEERING DIVISION 4. Prior to final map recordation., the precise alignment of Camino Predera at Red Hili Country Club Drive shall be revised to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. S. Installation of a storn,drain system.from existing inlet at Red Hill Country C10 Drive to the existing inlet structure at Cucamonga Creek Channel including dedication of easements shall be wequired to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. All existing easements lying within the future right -of- way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer's requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. ?. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. El rage s 8. Adequate provisicns shall be ,Tilde for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 9. Private drainage easements with improvements for cross lot drainage where required shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 10. Sewage for lots 1 -21 shall be accomplished in common and maintained by C.C. & R.'s by the developer prior to the release ^f all improvement bonds for the tract or other alternatives to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Building Official. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - BY: �� « {• Richard Dahl, Chairman ATTEST: Secretary, of the Planning Cam ss 1, JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was euly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Pianniny Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote ro- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Tolstoy, King, Rempel, Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None C DEPAP.TMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS — Subject: Applicant: �rel Location: lG,ta1 frt.' G: >`7� L..L Those items checked are conditions of approval. P/,\ITAPT 1(' f11 A,1,1, RIP 11T,IISION FOR CCUMPf I NC E" 1.11 TL1 THE f111 1 0111 ANG M:'f L1LR'll >'1RLL LV.IIRLI •IIL fLR1.lI 11,U U1I101V1, FOR VUI I(L1RNL.L 111 Ii1L VLLVn 11,J CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevaLiens incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. rv, 3. Apprcvai of this request shall not waive compliance with a:l sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect —at time of Building Permit issuance. i/ 4. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings :.re to be constructed in ar. area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as 'lhazardous11, the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. E. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for — review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All roof zppurtenances, integrated, shielden fri and streets as required v�10. Prior to any use of the thereon, all conditions the satisfaction of the 11 inciudina air conditioners, shall be architecturally )m view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties by the Planning and Building Divisions. project site or business activity being conmenced of approval contained herein shall be completed to Director of Co— nnunity Cevelopment. _ 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. _ 12. All swimming pools installed ac the time of initial development shall be solar heated. _ _ 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreatic-_1 uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. ---15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy or the first unit. _ 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices such as window locks shall be installed on each-unit. _ 14. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted — for a solar water heating unit. 20. Enemy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be incorporated into this project to include such things as but rot limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation., double paned windo:•rs, extended overhangs, pilotless appliances, etc. 21. Th`s development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails sha'1 be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed ecuestrian trail plan indicating widths, maximum scopes, phys -ical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standards shall be- submitted to and approved by the _ City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. _ 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian, trails. — E 11 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and /or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing poiici_s and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates., rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision - shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. _ B. Parking and 'Vehicular Access 1. All parking lut landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension t ll• and .L +,l nta�ri 12" ,1. .ice -.ent t. .rki.... tall V -, auu Suu, wu�n.r. a tc .+a.n au,�c�u.� vv pu. - $..0 — 2. Parking lot trees shall be a mininum 15 g<<llo:: size. — 3. All two -way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 4. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet :vide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5 7 0­3 All parking spaces shall be double striped. Ail units shall be provided with automatic garace door openers. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. The C.C. & R.'s shall restrict the storaoe of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the o,::ner. _ 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior ciruiation aisle other than in designated visitor parkins areas. C.C. & R.'s sha'.i be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscanino _ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be sub^�itted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Existing trees shall be re- taired ;h_rever possitle. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location, size and type shall be- cc -.plete^ ty the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30'. Oead, decaying or potentially dancerous trees shah be :- proved for removal at the descretion of toe Planning Division. during the review of the Master Plan of Existing Or, -Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree- fcr -..ree basis as provided by the Planning O;vision. 11 �. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size nr large-, shall be instalied in accordance wit! the „aster Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and sha " be r;anted at an average or ovary 30 on interior streets and 20' an ex:ericr streets. 5. A minimum o+ 50 trees per n n r _ ` � gross acre, comprised o+ the r-oiiowing sizes, shall be provided within the development; 20%-24" box or larger, 70 > -15 rtal l nn and IOU% l ion. ga. _ 6. All -landscaped areas shail_te_ maintained in a ^ealthy and thriving condi} ion, free from weeds, trash, and debris. ?� 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) fee*_ in vertical height shall and are 5:1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated it accordance with slope panting requirements of tha C, ty of Rarch: Cucamonga. Such slope Planting shall include but rat be limited to O rooted Ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such pianting and `rric -tion shall be continuously maintained in a heathy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing Occupancy for those units, arl in50ect4on of the sloozs shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in s2t7s'actcry condition. in the ca';e of custom lot Subdivisions, all sup slopes shall be seeded wit" native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control s= tisfactory to the Building C°ficia.. Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided LO ner: :nate the seed and to a point o" mcnt.,s after germinaticn. t� 3. All parkways, Open areas, and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or Other i^eans acceptable t0 the c;ty. Such proo' of - zintenance -Shall be .3;;'t— fitted to the City prior to issuance of z^;ild;nc permits. . _ 9. Che front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrication system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final desicn of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping and sidewalks sha17 be incluc!e -' in the required landscape plans ar:d shall be 3Lbject to apprcv =_1 oy the Planning Qivisien. _ 11. A minimum of = within the protect. specimen size trees shall be planted 12. Special landscape features ruch as rounding, alle :via' -ock, speczaar size trees, and ai abundance or landscaping is requirea along 1. Aft D. Signs E. E- I. Any sians proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. _ 2. ^ uniform sign program for t *,s development shall be submitted to the - Planning Division for t'reis review and aporcvai prior to issuance of Building permits. _ 3. The signs indicated on the submittea plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval. Additional Aoorovals Reauired _ 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall ae accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Anproval of Tentative 'ract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change _ , ind /or Va riance /Conditional Use Permit C. This Conditional Use PE -.i t is granted for a period of m071th(s j at which time the Planning Commission may ad-: or delete conaitians o:, revoke the Conditional Jsr- Per.,:it_ _ 5. The developer is requi-ed to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes wti:h have a private cr public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot , Tract , or, , I have read the C.C. & R.'s and understand tnat said Lot is subject x a miltual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian. traffic to gain access. Signed 'urcnaser Said statement is to be fi'ed by the developer with tLe City prior to occ *pancy. t/ 6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of boil ding pe ^its, when no subdivision map is involved, written certification from all affected School Districts, shal1 be submitted to the Department of Cc=,jnity Development_ which states that z:deeuate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating stu.ents generated by this project. Such letter of certificatior...iust have been issued by the School District within ® sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. v'7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or Prior to the issuance• of building permits when no map is inv-olved, written certification from the affected water district, th ?t adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to se-ve the proposed project, shall be submitted to t-a Department of %a' —...Unit, Davelcpment. Such letter must have been issues -,y the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval i the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities a71 by the Santa Ana Regional :dater Control Board and the City, writtz-, sere - ficaticn of acceptability, including ali supportive information, shall be obtained and submitted to the City. '` 8. This approval shall is not approved and involved, within tvr unless an extension become n r corded e -Ive (12) has been al and vo'd or building months from granted by if the tentative subdivision map permits issued when no map is the approval of this n.•n ior+ the Planning Col;nission. 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development packe ,.e and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design sec Lion of the Gro:•ith Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract hones. APPLICANT SHALL CCN'TACT T E BUILDING DIVISION cOR CO�4PLT" THE F0 ,-LOWING E diTri E: r'„��OkIRG CO'DITIO;S: F. Site Osyelprment _ V/1 The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Cod=_, Uniform ?'echanical Code, Unifor+n Plumbing Code, National Electric Cade, and a_11 other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. Y 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for ccrbustible construction„ evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protec-Gicn is available. r V 3. Prior to the issuance of a building perr':t for a new res dertia3 d +.Yelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s), the app'iicent shali pay davelopment fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but rot be limited to: City Beautificztion Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and .lam Checking Fees, and Sciool Fee. C. Pris?r to the issuance of a buillir,g permit for a new ;o^^.ercial or industrial development or addition to an existing developmen,, the applicant shall pay development fees at the ei'tablished rate. Such fees may include, bit not be lirnited to: Systems Develc;.ment Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Cnecklna Fees. _ S. This approval shall become ruli and void if building permits are not issued for this oroject within Jne year from the date of projECt approval. 1� 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building cfficial. r' 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non - combustible roof material. 8. All corner dwellings shah have the building elevation facia% the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wocd siding or plan -ons where appropriate. G. Existina Strurtures _ i. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire- resistiveness of existing buildings. _ 2. Existing building's) shall be made to comply with current_ Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shali be demolished. _ 3. Existina seviage disposal facilities shall be re -moved, filled and /or capped to cc -ply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Coca. F. Rradina ?. Grading o* the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Suiidine Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final gra: ? plan shall be it substantial conformance with the - a;proved conceptual gracing plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. n c ^elccical report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geoloai-t and sut=it d at th> time of applization for grading plan check. l%4. The final grading plan shall be subjer.t to revie.a and approval by the Planrr -g, Engineering_ and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to rt�.jrdation of the final subdivision map or issuar.cp of building per-it wiChev ?r comes first_ APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT TEE ENGIN'Zr: I- C07Z I , IONS I. Dedicaticns and 'Vehicular Access — - I. t�.edlCations shall be made by final map o' all interior street rights-of -way -- ar,d all necessary easements as shorn cn the tentative m'ap. J Z. Cedication shall be made of the folio -wing missing rights -of -way on the follnw4ng treeLS: add ;tional feet on additional feet on additional feet_ on i L 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as fo 11 ows : S. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made far the ingre� -, engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Imorovernents I. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavenent, sidewalk, drive approaches, parw4ay trees and street lights on all interior streets. Y" 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but rot limited to: CURB & A.C. j SIDE - DRIVE j STREET ' A.C. I WHEEL S'REE' ?If ":E GJ--ra i PVMT_ ` WALK r APPR. j LIGHTS i GVERL. ^,f CHAIR Rfi'PS � OTHER 3. Prior to any work being perfor -,:ad in the public right -of -way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the Citv Engineer's Office, in addition to any other permits required. cam" 4. Street improvement pians approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required, for all street improvements, prior to issuance of an encroach: ^ent per-,it. L,- 5. Surety shall be posted and an aereement executed to the satisfactior. of the City Engineer and the City-Attcrney, guaranteeing coranletion of the pibiic irorovements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Z, 6. All street ir..,rote^=_nts shall be installed to the satisfaztion of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. 1/ 7. P2Ve ^:. =nt Striping, r,a r. ng, traffic and street nanE signing shall be instal per the requi--- ants o` the City Engineer_ Adw K: Draindpe and Flood Control ' 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all_onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. L. E M. El 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: —3. Ahe proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the (National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provi•,ions -of the program and City Ordinance Dlo. 211. T R n J - - - - I a Cq ii.- Cp 11 r411 l tV protect - w a na- a .. c 1 dJ_ 1ood , l l l I requ. CU :. the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. _ S. The following north -south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, cocnercial type drive approaches, rolled street connections, flood protection walls, andlor landscaped earth ber. -s and rolled driveways at property lire. Utilities - ✓" 1. All proposed utilities within the project inclut" nc ut.l1,.es alone major arterials i 2. Utility easer..ents shall be provide to th utility cor,.panies and the City Engineer. shrill be instalied underground less than 12 KV_ - e specification of the serving .i 3. Ceveloper shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. r 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. / 5. Mater and serer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet recuire -ents of the Cucamonga County :dater District (CCdD), Foothill Fire District and the .Envircn-,ental - earth De;artr.:=_nt of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CC::D will be required prior to recordation. 5. Arprovals have not been secured from all utilities and other Interested agencies involved. Approval of the final rap tiiill be subject to any requirements that Tay be rem eived 'f-rom them. General Re^_uirements and Aoo -ovals - 1. permits frci other agencies wilt be required as follows: A. Caltrans for: 8. County Dust Abatement (required prior to issuance of a grading permit) 1::•C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District ,,,D. Other: ��•Z}Yrsi� 1-'•': �= Q"rcrC'.:19.�...� i5ct2��x - 1 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC &R's) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City, _ 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to for Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council. The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. i t/ 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedure3. LJ �. J Mr. Edwards __ted the applicant's strong feelings about homeowner associations because of tY,a problems they have encountered in this valley. He indicated that the applicant understands what the homeo�r er association entails ' and that there is substantially more coat or the part of the association. Chairman Stout stated that the other tni:ig iS the landscaping outside the City right -of -way. fie indicated that this would be under the jurisdiction of the homeowner association. Mr. Edwards indicated that he wished to speak to staff about that. r�hairman Stout stated that the two trails to the north and south are a co�.3nity trail and a regional trail and he was concerned because of the security problem. He indicated th".t there should be access. Comaissionzr Barker stated that they could indicate that it would be secure to vehicular, access only. Mr. Hopson stated that the best say tc maintain that this would remain open is for the developer's attor'hey to irsert language into the CC&R's relative to lots A & B so that the co�.nnity trail is public and that there would be vehicular access to it because it cannot be restricted. He indicated that he would look for this in the CC&R's. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. ® ibtion: Moved by Juarez, secor_ded by Mc Niel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 83 -66A providing revisions to engineering conditions of approval for Tentative Tract 12232, with the addition of a requirement for a homeowner association and modification to the CC&R's. a * a s t DIRECTOR'S REPORTS N. TIIi£ ffiTEHSZOH FOR 'SNTATIVE TRACT 10035 - R. E. ASSOCIATES - A resiaentuzi subdivision of 15.7 acres of land into 38 custom lots in the R -1 zone, located south and east of Red Hill Countrf Club give, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207 - 101 -37 and 207- 902 -10. (Continued from Planning Commission meeting of August 10, 1983.) Senior Planner, Michael Va:rin, reviewed the staff report. Chairman Stout stated that when this came before the Commission the last time there was concern about access. Mr. Vairin replied that this is correct and additionally, there vas concern regarding the project's design. Chairman Stout opened the public hearing. E1r. William Beverly, a partner, stated that he had received Lhe staff repor+: and found it to be clear and lucid in its presentation. Planning Commission Minutes -16- September 14, 1963 Chairman Stout asked the applicant what his concept was of this subdivision. that no one has a E4. Beverly replied that they, want to keep this area in as natural a state as can be finaled. possible with very little ctting. He indicated that they wish to build the majority of property owners custom homes that would h° split level and designed for the tot. would like to see something done on access, it would be all right Chairman Stout asked if the lot size would be about 12,000 square feet. this tract for a Mr. Beverly replied that they propose to build homes that are between 180u- order for something to be worked 2000 square feet and they want to leave as much open space as possible. Hopson indicated Chairman Stout asked if a- ebicectural control of the project would be through CUR`s. Mr. Beverly replied that ultimate control would be through the City's Design Review Committee. He indicated that they would have 3-4 standard styles. Chairman Stout asked if there would be some guidelines so that Design Review would know what to expect. Imo. Beverly stated that currently they are not attempting to sell the lots individually but they are trying to build " a joint venture. Chairman Stout stated that he considers this area to be very sensitive and open to view to everyone driving down Foothill Boulevard. Commissioner Rempel stated that when discussing the grading to the area north of the City in the Foothill Community Plan lot size requirements were very high. He indicated that size is important here as well since slope grades could be as high as 15 percent. He indicated that access to the parcels down on Foothill are also _.portant because if this project goes in, others will be landlocked. Commissioner Rempel stated that some provision should be made for access by commercial developments. Mr. Beverly stated that from a practical sense, they are the same property owner. Commissioner Rempel stated that they are not all the same owner. Mr. Vairin stated that any change in terms of access to other properties would require revision to the Tentative Tract Map and would have to go through a hearing process. He explained that non action on extending this would negate the present tentative tract and would require a filing of a new one. Mr. Hopson stated that no one has a vested right in a tentati ^e tract until it can be finaled. Further; that if the majority of property owners feel they would like to see something done on access, it would be all right to %xtend this tract for a period of time in order for something to be worked out. Mr. Hopson indicated thv!; this would save a filing fee. Mr. Vai ^in stated that an extension of 90 d ?;•s could be granted to work out the problems or the Ccmmission could grant an extension as is. Planning QDmmission Minutes -17- September 14, 1983 '0.. Commissioner Rempel stated tnat there is a problem here that needs to be solved revved= B access and he felt that a certain condition for review should be built in relative to the size of the homes. commissioner Barker stated that the property having the difficulty is commercial, but he was unable to determine .drat would go there any stated, while it is a problem, he did not know what tc do about it. Commissioner MoNiel asked what can be done about the commercial designation in :he area. Mr. Hopson replied that if a majority of the property owners feel that a Wneral Plan Amendmert is in order and there are some City they could asp: the City to sponsor the amendment for lots 13 and 31 or whatever i,. appropriate. He indicated that the City does have the power to do this. K-. Vairin stated that this property is general planned for general commercial, C-2, and there are a lot of alternatives for conditional type uses. There was discuisior_ as to what types of access could be found with the consensus of the Commission that this entire area be looked at as a whole rather than parcel by parcel. Mr. Beverly stated that there is something he does not understand in that this whole thing had been looked at previously and approved. He asked what facts in the area have changed. Chairman Stout replied that the Planning Commission has changed. Mr. ? Hopson asked if it is important for Mr. Beverly to know because it is not legally important. Chairman Stoat stated that this property is but one piece in a puzzle, and if it goes through as it is presently proposed, it could destroy something else. Commissioner Mc Niel stated that he has no qualms with the project but is concerned with the guy next door. He indicated that if the roles were reversed and Mr. Beverly was being landlocked, he would let the Commission know. Tur. Beverly stated that it appears that there is no reasonable access and tiv-t his project should not be held up because of this. Commissioner A--Niel stated that the Commission can then deny the exsan�,ion. Mr. Vai ^in stated that if the applicant agrees to work with tr.e other property owners a short time extension can be granted in order to see if the access problem car_ be worked out as well as looking at the land use. Chairman Stout asked the applicant if he understood what was happening. Planning Commission liwtes -18_ September 14, 1983 A. ENVIRONMENTAL MS'ES "'ENT FOR DEVELOPMCNT RUlt -W us -La - o.+ ® o_ve opmert o,39 square fool in ustr�a+ bum ding cn land in the Industrial Park category (Subarea 7), located southx��st corner of Civic Center Drive and Utica Avenue - APN 208- 622 -02 & Os. 11 11 RTOhi - The 2 acres of at the is. TIME rX ENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10035 - R.H. ASSOCIATES - A resmoeni�a std �viszon o acres o tangy Ito custom lots in the R -1 zone, located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Carle Carazon - APH r-0, i^1 47 2n7- nag -ln, Commissioner Rempel stated his concern with this property is that there is another piece of property to the west which is landlocked with a long railroad strip without access. Further, there is already a developed tract north of 6.1-lis property and Corenissicner Rempel stated he felt that some provision should be made to have another access into this property. Chairman Stout askea if anything had been filed on the parcel west of this property. Commissioner Rer.pel stated that the area to the west has been developed into condominiums and totally blocks this property. Further, that unless the owner wants to give up a lot for street access, the extension requested should be denied. win. �'airi:� statev that the current expiration date on this property is September 25. Further, that the applicant could be contacted in order to be made aware of the Commission's concern. M:-. Vairin stated that no action at this meeting would mean that the applicant would still have time to make adjustment to the map before its expiration. C,aair - man Stout asked if a representative from R.H. Associates, the applicant, was present at this meeting. No one spoke. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Barker, carried unanimously, that this item t+e Brought back to the Planning Commission at their first regular meeting in September. yeff Kin 9375 Archibald, addressed the Commission stating that when Tentative 9, Tentative Tract No. 10035 came before the Commission there was a great deal of discussion because it was landlocked and also because of ex-;sting slope, grading, drainage and aesthetics. Further, that a €ter the Commission had approved this tentative tract, the feeling of the Commission was that it was a mistake. Planning Comission Minutes -2- August 10, 1983 t Mr. Beverly replied that he is being asked to :cork cut a master plUn. He asked what happens :Lf the property owners don't want to York with him. Chairman Stout replied that he does not have a problem then. Mr. carry Johnson stated that he was not involved in the original conceptual plan and going over the minutes this war thoroughly discussed by the previous commission. he indicated that this property was general planned R -1 and changed to commercial after the general plan was adopted. Further, that a- t'rat time the Ammission felt nothing could be done regarding access. He indicated that the cost of a m25te. plan for this could be considerable and was not sure that they would be able to proceed. Chairman Stout stated that the applicant can reauest a continuance or can accept denial of the time extension. Mr. Vairin stated that it is important to get the applicant's agreement for a time extension and that it be conditioned so that the other property owners meet to make a decision relative to access. Co=i.:3sioner Parker stated that he is concerned with having the whole burden of the access issue fall on this property ow-er. Commissioner Rempel stated that they would not have to Hind the whole thing. Mr. Lam asked if the condition is that the applicant perform a study relative to access or will he take the ini:.iative in getti. -:g a study for the area. He indicated that the I=o licaticn i� '.:zat if there is no participation, this will qP be dropped. Commissioner Barker stated that if the other property owners are not interested in getting involved in the study, it will be dropped. Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by Mc%Je 1, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution No. 81 -344 t1c grant a time extension of 120 days in order for the applicant to work with other property owners is determining access for adjacent, properties. ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by Rempel, seconded by &-rker, carried unanimously, to adjourn to September 20, 1983 for a Development Code Works!^cp at the Lions Park Commrsrity Center to be held at 6:30 p.m. 10:55 p.m. „e Plaiming Commission adjourned. Respectfully submitted, r JACK LAM, Secretary Planning CDMM1331or Minutes -19- September 14, 1983 Mr. King stated that as the tract is presently formulated, it should not be allowed and should be totally reworked for single family residences or multiple family use with significant open space. He indicated, that in present form, the development is totally inappropriate for that location. Chairman Stout asked that more material on this discussion., including the minutes, be provided to the Commission. Chairman Stout also asked that the Commission's concern be conveyed to the applicant so that this concern may be addressed. Mr. Gomez stated that a letter would be directed to the applicant the following day. C. TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 10210 - FORECAST MORTGAGE - A custom lot residential subdivision. of 33 acres into 3 lots in the R -1- 20,000 and R -1 -1 acre zone, generaily located on the north side of Almond, between Sapphire and Turquoise. Commissioner Barker st.ited that Item E5 of the conditions of approval has been rewrit *en and asked that the new condition be substituted for the original condition of approval. Mr. Gomez stated that or July 6, 1983, this tentative tract was approved by the Equestrian Committee. Commissioner Rempel stated that at the time original approval of this tract is was given there was a ict of concern that the equestrian trail be taken care of. Motion: Moved by Barker, seconded by Rempel, carried unanimously, to adopt Resolution 81 -106A approving the time extensiov for Tentative Tract 10?10, Forecast Mortaage, with the new condition. PUBLIC HEARINGS D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 83 -12 - PIERSON - The establishment of a dance school in tte Industria Park zone 75barea 7) to be located at 10722 Arrow Route, Suites 604 and 606, in the Rancho Cucamonga Business Park. Rick Gomez °-,ty Planner, reviewed the staff report. Mr. Ted Hooso:.. Assistant City A,:torney, asked if the hours of operation will be considered in the Resolution. Mr. Gomez replied that because of the hours selected for use by the applicant staff did not plr,.e a condition in the Resolution; however, if the Commission has concern, it could be added as a condition of approval. 11 Planning Commission Minutes -3- Aagust 10, 1983 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF 'rUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PANNING COMMISSION, APPROVING THE TIME EXTENSION FOR TE`:TpTTvE TRACT 10035, LOCATED SOUTH AND EAST OF FOOTHILL COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE, ZOUTH OF CALLE CORAZON WHEREAS, a request has been filed for a time extension, for the above - described project, pursuant to Section 1.401.11.2 of Ordinance 28 -B, the Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Coc,enission conditionally approved the above - described Tract Map SECTION 1: The 'Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Commission has made the following findings: A. That prevailing economic conditions have caused a distressed market climate for residential projects. B. That cu-rent economic, marketing, and inventory conditions make it unreasonable to record the * at this time. C. That strict enforce-me-t of the conditions of approval rEgarding expirations would not be consistsnz with the intent o� the Develgpmt;nt Code. D. That the granting of said time extension will not be detrimental to the public heaith, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements X n the vicinity. SECTION 2: The Rancho Cucamonga ?lanning Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tract �p 1p 'cant Expiration 1U[,35 R.H. Associates March 25, 1985 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11th DAY OF January, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION Jr THE CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMONGA GY• Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: i Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho di Cucamonga, do hereby ceriify that the foregoing Resolution Was duiy and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, atla9Bregular thvotee Cortrnission held , by the on the 11th day of January, AYES- COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: to 11 E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1384 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gonez, City Planner BY: Frank Dreckman, Assistant Planner 1977 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -33 - SALTrR - The development of a 34,754 sq. ft. commercial coon 3.3 acres of land in the General Commercial area of the Industrial Area Specific Plan located on the east side of Haven Avenue, between Arrow Route and Foothill Boulevard. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: The applicant is requesting approval of a 34,754 sq. ft. commercial complex. B. Purpose: To create a 34,754 sq. ft. commercial complex C. Location: East side of Haven Avenue between Arrow Route and oot7MBoulevard (Daon complex, north of K -Mart) D. Parcel Size: 3.3 acres E. Existin Zonin Commercial within the Industrial. Area Specific Plan ubarea 7) F. Existing Land Use: Vacant Parcel G. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - North - Vacant parcel, zoned commercial South - Commercial (K -Mart) zoned commercial East - Vacant parcel, zoned commercial West - Vacant parcel, zoned commercial H. Industrial Specific Plan Desiqnations: Project Site - Commercial tSubarea 7) North - Commercial (Subarea 7) South - Commercial (Subarea 7) East - Commercial (Subarea 7) West - Commercial (Subarea 7) ITEM M PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 83 -33 /Salter January 11, 1984 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: The site consists of a previously graded pad ncrth of the existing K -Mart shopping complex located near the intersection of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route. The project site has been cleared of all vegetation and there are no structures located on the parcel. All required off -site improvements have been completed as a part of the Daon Master Plan for the project area. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting approval of a 34,754 square #Toot commercial complex (Exhibit "A "), which will become part of the previously approved K -Mart center. As illustrated on Exhibit "C ", the proposed retail spaces are part of a larger complex which will ultimately consist of the existing K -Mart center, office, and restaurant uses. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee was primarily corecerne wit. providing architectural continuity and compatibility with the existing K -Mart to the south. Specifically, the Coaenittee recommended that: (a) the proposed wood fascia match the existing K -Mart fascia in terms of consistent use of building materials, colors, and fascia dimensions; (b) the proposed north, northwest, and west building elevations be constructed of split -face block with scored accent blocks to match the existing K -Mart; (c) the north and northwest parapet walls be extended in height to screen mechanical equipment; and, (d) all major building components O .e., arcade canopy, fascia support columns, parapets, elevation walls, kiosks, corner tower, etc.), materials and color be compatible with the existing K -Mart commercial structure to the south. The Design Re'. aw Committee was also concerned with providing an identifying gateway into the shopping center and recommended the use of an entrance tower designed to act as a focal point. In addition, the Committee recommended that the structure be designed to extend above the horizontal plane of the collonade roofline to increase its importance as a gateway into the center. Althou9t, the applicant has provided revised elevation plans, they do not appear to fully address or mitigate the Design Review Committee's concerns. Conditions of approval have been provided on the attached Resolution designed to mitigate these design concerns. 11 u E PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 83 -33 /Salter January 11, 1984 Page 3 C. Develo ent Review Committee: The Development Review Committee was primarily concerned with landscaping and recommended that additional landscape planters be provided within the parking area. D. Grading Committee: The Gradir,y Committee has approved the annlz .antic rnnceptual grading plan subject to approval of a precise grading plan. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been comp etc y t.e app scant and is attached for your review. Staff completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse impacts. III. FACTS FCR FINDINGS: The findings listed in the attached Resolution can be supported by the following facts: o The project provides adequate setbacks. landscaping, and improvements which make it comp•tible with surrounding land uses. o The project site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate is the development and the proposed uses are in accordance with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and Zoning Ordinance. o The proposed building design and site plan, in conjunction with the conditions of approval, are consistent with the current development standards of the City. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for environmental review in Terse aaiiy Report newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission To—nsider all input and elements of the project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. l�submi tted , Ricks Gc�¢ Cit4 Planner RG:FD:jr d Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Plan Exhibit "B" - Elevations Exhibit "C" - Own luster Plan Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with conditions et r CD ' m o %ii! Iit N A - • T "' F ! t � 9 � t• -rL v r- quart 3 \Iyw=tvgw K MART COMMERCIAL sa..utirr I 6SStCanony RANCHO CUCNTvl 1 "GA PL kNNI�iG D['%rG N J` TM E: S S Pi z1 E HIElT= AN _SCALE- 'i 47-t li PLANNING D(NIS014 LXHIBrr.- SCALE;-� 1.111 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA -IONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SYi=T - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review ° °?: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days before the public meeting at which time t_hie project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tioa concerning the proposed project_ PROJECT TITLE: K -*fart Commercial Center APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, :_vLEPHONE: (213) 558 -4525 Daniel J. Salter, D_ Salter & Company NAME, rV)DRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: D. Salter S Co. (213)558 -4525 (714)476 -2766. AIL,ert x LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARC}L NO.) Fare-al S Parcel Map No. 825U (Applied for) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE Vim= FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: Building parmit�.ity cf Rancho Cucamonga Sewer and Water Permits - Cucamonga Countv Water Distr er I -1 �t j71je � �1 I rli d !� s i'^ 3 , � I �1, y I �' I1 f ~j I LAivl--> USE COM/V7EA'C /AL iIr[ � CITY OF R d►N�� D C-ljCA QNGA � OMMC�PL /nom W.-T% a r El 0 LGNEG 7CaST. ?�R e PROJECT DESCRIPTION ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND PROPOSED 8U11_nn1mCS IF ANY. 3.3 Acrem of co=er lal zoned la W center SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTI' ... aav MP1U DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF PROJECT INFORMATION O* THE PRw cCT SITE ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL TOPOGRAPHY, PLAZ3TS (TREES), OF SURROUNDING PROPE :, :LESSTANDCTHE DESCRIPTION SCENIC ASPECTS USE EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): to S Sewe Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series Of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? N0. I -2 e Sn'TLL THIS PP.OJECT: YES NO K 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? K 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? K 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? % 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? x 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? K 6. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: IMPORTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Date October 19, 1SP3 Signature ,LJ e , < < Title D Salter & Company. Presid 1-3 n �J RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83 -33 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF HAVEN AVENUE BETWEEN ARROW ROUTE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE COMMERCIAL (SUBAREA 7) ZONE WHEREAS, on the 18th day of November, 1983, a complete application was filed by D. Salter & Company for review of the above - described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of January, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Plannino Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions appiicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code.; and 4. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That th•'s project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 11, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 83 -33 is approved subject to the following conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. All major building materials and components (stucco, coiionade roof canopy, facia support columns, etc.) shall be consistent and compatible with those used on the adjacent '< -Mart. 2. North and northwest building elevation parapet walls shall be extended to the top of the collonade roof pitch, designed to screen all mechanical egiipment. Resolution No. Page 2 3. North, northeast, and west beildirg elevations shall be composed of split face concrete block (witn a scored accent strip) designed to integrate with the existing K -Mart to the south. 4. An orientating gateway shall be provided and designed to act as a focal point. This feature shall be designed to substantially extend above the horizontal plane of the colionade roof canopy= designed to increase its importance as a gateway into the center. Final design approval shall be required by the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Full width access aisle with asphaltic concrete shall be provided to complete the circulation pattern of the parking lot. 6. Recordation of Parcel Map 8250 shall be required prior to issuance jk building permits. The project shall also be subject to any applicable conditions related to Parcel Map 8250. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Dennis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Reso'iu:;on was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: 11 E El r z O G qZ o- 0 O O u c u S L� O CQ7 o v d � V V � ✓ V = _i =N V G� yOr g Yid ,'S w P p K N qoi �4 n q�I gi °d _✓ v o (O� V 6 a C O L r Y Y N Y 6pV aE L ! i V—°O CL> N r J = V O C r C L C ry a s uv 9 V C g&C+ i L 4 V � = c V L q nMi 9 V O r O 4 yqV l n� °rE � FL °we O � C _ C V r C V C LL C P ssd •DC . To > o`ui p� +v rq O O •' ° Sim 'o ogc a+g qn aN oc i > P n r io NY c L V r rO r` O c o y q O L •". r L C M E � 1r' L yr' r e i OV V O' +COQ NL CI N= C q O V V > C z iE V V4 m I- CC ion s - o �wc - z > >.a co q y� ry 4 gC 0 4 r s✓ Co N( G La q_ Ngn° OV C V 4 ��✓ �V o �V ` o C° f P o S g : `` q X e ` V a ✓ i N Y p ✓� g q. O ac° r4 VN 8'w arg OC .(yy1 n C Z i V V V V a ✓L C C V ��11r r N �j .4i� O N q Z G 0 C q O C V Y L V g r 4 V n N _ N V q E 4 ✓ 0 4 r ° C 4 V 9 4' Y q O > = O 4 V C O L q ^ L q O 0 ..Ea' 6 V r ^ GO O V 6 \• e 4 N 6 a VOpi L •C°C C Nl✓ >l P... ✓ qy Eyd V{ v E V yQr Cry Z q 7 V O q O r y O W + N V a 4( C d u � p l 1 O C `� .. L Oo_ ✓ G L Oo r CCC N 0 4 Y L L VV • r -y C P O N E O r• -YE ryry �O p Z Z C _ N V q 9 q O q L q C �w „ = � ✓O Pr�N t9�w 6 .Cn E �'.�✓ M'C ✓ p V� r ` C _ Z1 V` r O V N V E q l $o ✓ 'p ° M O.y y� i' J s L —e C( C>.V C Nf O =LY ✓ .E C> PC LV t` L O < r� O C� O c O w CV� O C V 4 L C Y c G Opp! � O u_ ✓ c V� V r Cl = W r• •O .(i� o t 8� y — q V 4� C> V� i '•r 9 0 _ V a ` r q g d q C p ti N r 4 0— O O ` b° q r° �•diMq °— V° ` rPgr .�]�•q_ O— .(Oq qG qTq pp .CO.m a 4 G <g6t6 <'J OU lN6Q lgam !G �4w �.Ln� w•L NO !M�•CV El r z O G qZ o- 0 O O u c u S L� O CQ7 o v d � V V � ✓ V = _i =N V G� yOr g Yid ,'S w P p K N qoi �4 n q�I gi °d _✓ v o (O� V 6 a C O L r Y Y N Y 6pV aE L ! i V—°O CL> N r J = V O C r C L C ry a s uv 9 V C g&C+ i L 4 V � = c V L q nMi 9 V O r O 4 yqV l n� °rE � FL °we O � C _ C V r C V C LL C P ssd •DC . To > o`ui p� +v rq O O •' ° Sim 'o ogc a+g qn aN oc i > P n r io NY c L V r rO r` O c o y q O L •". r L C M E � 1r' L yr' r e i OV V O' +COQ NL CI N= C q O V V > C z iE V V4 m m M i T V L 9 P OCu CpO Tpm``e Op. -uO6y uY «GEFF�E''NNOrV ]. d4- _pNY 4O> 06 G r n V 4 9 L Y O O -1; cc cc - q O� ° IV' ].• O V N 0 q L L• y N { G O d r° C O = 2 L qgc`oL ° i9^ - ` Cs ! d n y tMg ] yx W r �` - ' Z L=)rT G.o •- r -TV - z � G acL p = �T�' Z7,8. 1.5 G. k, 4 a Tda S v = . .s J LcGw4.c) - CCc N V T G G Q V y Y' ! Y V °Y - �. 0 1) r g O x C .�. S C C 0 =G L G .-V V dOCN Y 1 2-KeO V e Z ^S L 4 f a - ° C16 4NS 4": ocz« :u.°. JN yv -o w�� -v - °vim• «P -o o '" c�� a °a4i G =avi�„ rb �, �`o� V= N V L .Ge .nz N' 4c _ =d€ «��oc o= �.J.. =�`�ry it .9o.. _oJ.�)4icv wgr_`o «dYO •+ °c- L« L 9'z g O N i N V ° ... M i L V V L ^_ GC QlY6 �Gn� nn L.r2 �4Ga2 4j- £ -�L > 6 9 M I a, a "- -o rd0 y C -Olv ` 4`•-60 COCn C p L°irC y T q Y L- T O 9 O rCl rV -C rr .✓ry QN�TTU -.O^>V ' N � N .T c u4 vr� �°. r 2gva. «L a rna• zd .`Ny, c�c- ]•.ri N Y.. '° -N �eoo- o -Wr. rc� �.tiC E4r bG V4 -� n.°• -- Y a _ .J •. l V y a y G ' > 6 O yVri' > C« wo C. SV Tu V T.G. p yay $C' ` �O g } ue °, L o d qdn O C 2 O Zir Vrr� Y- 0 ppO V C O' q yaL!g -. G . r �! a cd °fig$ o'cc Q, o`er ..VJ. .r..r 3r Vd c wG'„tC G .: _� ^p r c O - �n� V4 t.�i V .^O.<�. •Gw � VCO� -+ �` =�+ G Or C O- 9 � V T T r 4 Y+ G- n 4 °= � C C 9 p V 2 L -'E O .« t V a - S L 4 9 L y C P� � V « r .. « p f• V= � - O V L � C C2 _ 'G -Ny N14 tY JrO 6V 4r P- �r� «C.1 Q <rQV {AI N� N Qv y� -Cq V ;•' 0 N VsUT CQ^ N C •1 V �1 V Y e p n 6 P w Q Y V V O J C L N 6 L r V T � w �� y C •O G 1 L y CL 9 .9i .w C9 4 r • C r° a Uet ^�� r L^ a �N r 4 w bGr Nr 0 J O••L1y V9 Y =� M�CAB eL yy � OO ^._ .' O ^C N 6 QI Veyy Y t L 9 9CC CC :t5! O C V _ TC CwfT Q N QV.. V6 D D V dVGb Ypp Cpp' ' ,e° C°pG O y D V C p Q•{ =Ow Nib r V q V�'�V \vY N rLo 4i L O` O B O & P M O y r ^ CC M r • o Y C O. w P �{ N J J 9 Y Y L N N 4 O tCp C> V Sf f V `C w 4 l O V Y {V{�� SE Pte_ CT O yC r= CAL= �• n P � P V V;I^ _ p C r V YY T Y •� C N r J �O C VCOi Ni OC • y��_^ GPC 7GT•J C�C cO P >• e� 9T VM L 9 Yi.Y. TL L• 6 C 2 O ^pp CO i e N 6 S C� �CJ f° `CG T �C 0�9CC i.VUJ G�y^y/P ^LY V r T^C .1052 9 w P9�bw O^ S ~ N W _` N Y N O V � ^ C C S V ^ ^tJ1V y o o w7 cY V GEC �Q0 . O-.c V ate• J ^^ c M v AN C w > 7Z q ` a -Z �^i 2O ] • '� v S It YP� ° L H O ZEv,C V � P ° G 6 q LO ° P� r w i L C C • 4 � w V+ V L L- y� p' C E4 i�9 _aLa ` z a N V T O N > � w Y� •+ p O C CC wcmc u � Jcc �ocaL � °. "e. aag° C =v� � q•'�n O. Od1 .b n4 O Cp ^6.y LPVL� NO iQ 9�G OYV r =1 `Ve�VV • G P N D r C 0 0 L= 9 Ly O O� O 1 p a q+ u N C = t 6 ` -.2.2 N Q V C° e' C N N r a`i C w V zL —t2 cP �tM n L G 27, Y c CN- 0 0 ' N V CC ` y f a � � 4 _ •III N q r . O r NCru ZjL V`yLV VNy O �� Jw � .fir Y C `P1 _ yp -0 V °ryOOpCCpp P^i. -NO NF w,z TZZ Nw.r f n W� L V Y Y �c LLpp ^ V J .i M <Mw <G <N 1N Y Y CIiN�M� VL - VP O02 LP P VPV T t r O_ V V C� c `C L� a _ I} _r��q �W _r P� q9 �_ rS0 � yn �W •J L 9 C`OV yY «[!G• iY =r VO! AS ZP` V �� °O- _ Q V P L• � 9 G � V �J �� O V� •J � V P .L• ! .Oi r V OE .• i L O O C i � c aN- O t4 E n � V i J V O q 9 _C• V� >i 6 p V s 6i LL POW • V � = V 9 d _ L i L Y V� aa i � O p CCC q^ e V C Or V C OE rL C rGgYr _ _V� _r LyLL �i�r6 1{� w•Vi• O OJO.Y r �i •- C V V C C Q O O ry�On O q a01. L �+ -• \ q`�yy Y Ge Ly 4 V My, .• Z 2' CO --WV VOA Pi y •'• G COL M p(Y _.. q O-• iC O2-,V O L 5.2 C •" E ~ Y V O N J M V 9— gp 4 0 V q Q q P C �O� d pr a V V T W � q — e T !R i P P i •LVi• Pr O •Ji• V L_ � M [f i O •"•y LN i 4 C� C �c [Tim .ny — Snn O1_ r O q O i -• — S X Y • y• LO Y r N O O y J •J d Va vW VLM 4•- L lz d ya1rN p_ p N ...1 6 Va W O W YV �6 C'i •Jr' O� <r <PV <UW O �i C •; u I C _� r V•L.• M W ELT_ =� 9 • �+ V i V O• C .. � •� • I � Q C 6 p r M r a qe o_ Y eY •? roL �u -¢ Oy° 25 M � P i � 4 L {J Y ` V O V ` O M 1' V C V 0 O i - I > iV VLe� r ppW q ID O � COW 6rV.0 O M ' V, i � w� •••HHH � e � r• y t 6 I I G i C `� V •r• � J i l V V S 4 � q q C 1 C L•n yY O O VP� J i C I =qq4 q =V•Ji• Mdp Jr r4`CC °a e o v J c r2 e - _•.. a D 111 L. O-• Gr Y YW y7 � W I aVC�/ •L.•CV¢ I F r �PGC ICOAr ••� T_OL_ a O 4� ArY �r C6— V Osu` 8 � I �� ^O•I• ��pC �� i aGi �rc q'V� Oigq OI Y Y 4�- _Cq •.a— NJ4 1 O.�r'C� yam` i� q 00 VV Va P 9 R 4 OpO�` I O NS J > O Ot ~� a iL NV ��\ a CTC 6'.- _C •v -V ` 1t O y W Y 'Y O YI ¢ 1 YV yOr MgTr r� _-•.• �Of r = y GcO C T CVO g r ` Y q 2 V C 00 fi t C ��•Y�. VV PNO OC yCigi V- C O co 1t1t {P/l_p «P �.yq Iz y> o¢ S I ■ O i O r i e O L O. r` O. •a.• G f' I i V= p: V p d• O {S VI WW WI1 6VrV rf I { � � Z\W V+6 �• FyWi Se�I 1y7 V �{ >>•I _ <i ~I � i O \4 d S %1 L O LC P 0 v Ln u d 0 ac C 9 12 V Y O I C O y O I O T = P I I N �> � 1 Ni• ey I L. = S� o� J .o. a r00_ai I Pi. P 1 i .t. N 7, •� .n ° 60 O .O -C O acr V aW Y �L 6A YY _ e V� �~ M T y7i GGG NJ e 6¢ P O L 1 I I V N' N � rJ � N r C d O I = N L � = P= i < O M 44N .r = VS >b `{C`V < Oy � N6 cam= w ,M5 i mr N� 1 I C 'y^Lr r i N! I 1 Q. a C° 8� • �C N � a� l Y a �' -r C�Lp O 'a CCbO O pO L�NJ� y Ce-rLV• Tom+ p Q 4p V r Y p -� C y L Y a �� i I O �. d 2 Ca C y C p aas L r 1 L yy O O a Y 4 •La N O 60. V �4 V NT 1 N `V -pC VNdLPP 0 00 O O L y V C M� C0 O C =. V.V.b `T G 6� v O L Q i O Vr wL� rrr rda G Yea o`_ 9 o.o. -v' ate= Of + _N y i .r +Nie4 OCm 4i qr �v MVLLCmI C � 1 N O LV, ate•°• ` �4r i� ri � $t s 1 G �.. $ Ca —_ —_€ e4 i � ° YVdOa �O`Y 'YG �rylr v4)4 _O � Ofd r 0.6 l 4 N L` a-:; �4 &tO� V i P L Ya44iO .Vnl CC I O C � V �NY11_ � yp+ N OC + Y 4 OPG 1 C g 0 O ywV� 1 G M C- Q `■ C 0 w O O I O O z �• L 6J� _ V O 4 r i L C y p V N = r v P a V : C C= = - e - n l� a GGGGGG L L O LC P 0 v Ln u d 0 ac C 9 12 V Y O I C O y O I O T = P I I N �> � 1 J r00_ai P 1 II Liu f N 60 9 rF e V� �~ L p L C 6 d y7i GGG NJ e 1 I I a � rJ � N `O40L� d r I 4 C < .r = VS >b < +¢ cam= w I i mr N� 1 I C 'y^Lr r i N! I 1 L O LC P 0 v Ln u d 0 ac C 9 12 V Y O C O y 9 V ti O T = P r00_ai P II V N 9 e V� �~ L p L C 6 d y7i GGG L e e �_ I•YJ' � rJ � N `O40L� d r I 4 C = 7 V c cam= w oa i N� C 'y^Lr r i y Ce-rLV• Tom+ +�ryII V• ��,,r L -�_ -� C I I �� i •r •La N O 60. V �4 V NT 1 `V -pC VNdLPP 0 00 O O L y V C M� C0 O C =. V.V.b `T G 6� v O L Q i O Vr 4 rrr rda Yea o`_ o.o. -v' ate= + _N y �v O LV, ate•°• ` �4r i� ri � $t s �.. $ ° —_ —_€ e4 i � 0.6 l 4 N 4 �4 &tO� V N L Ya44iO .Vnl V I O C � V �NY11_ � yp+ N OC + Y 4 OPG 1 C g O ywV� 1 G M C- Q `■ C 0 w O O I O O z �• L 6J� _ V O 4 r i L C y p V N = r v P a V : C C= = - e - n l� a GGGGGG L d � 7 N6IaN Y.V O L LJ�J W 7�L Y L O LC P 0 v Ln in Ii n 0 z Y J d •�J O L P V a> L V O O C T- � y 7; = a M C L � c 4� °♦ 1 1 r �! � C G V I V L C I y 4� M �I O 2 Y v 0 i fS. C V O o� do o °Y v I L I Y a II « 11 O O c V � r i r J C � V i O i V ^ r r 4 y dz L y w i r a; o L o^ 4 � y P r r J _ P C r�0 V _40r N o • v o c V q ., I .. w 0 qvV 4 p � CL qY A V r0; M _V CN r L w � VC V q C9 t d P4 r 9 L i 9 1 V u = y e 9 `qJ Y Ll 44 =VVe y ad1 r U � r V — 4 V V nc Z4 c` ` X01 Qy = =oc go y d C� '_Big= a, 4° � I rdd 4r y i �P E v is i I uro c i i_e i _�.n _ 6 V C L r V V � OLI C C r q L+ q V O �V qC I I Prq VAC OW i OJ_ =W q2w `_ V T O i V ^ r r 4 y dz L y w i r a; o L o^ 4 � y P r r J _ P C +• Tyr d ' Fp PV u T 0 y 5 P wl � IC L n Par L V L L o F e 0 7Z�� ^ T J O TgrpM v T t arC q VV�_ G QFy_` Py Oa. G E V C O C q T P V O = C e V ^L ^v ri i6 ,14'i0 CV�W� LC O G C q 4 q L W rPLg� T_ L p der q 7 P y CLuC `Y t W w t V O L •! C V N O W A� ( w Y 1 I w! CV V o r c s Vow r V _ C � O r � 6 9 i 4 W r V J V PO V �C N V — �oo e S o Z 4'z Cr 6y q O +c yCy pa01 G.: O'G >� P O E —LGIOV E O. v. P M =� C v —a O J 4 V L T o.a d � t `r n v q v T C q 6 4 V r 'O v K j P a C _ aM i 4 r C r y V V N.wV P i c ` c L— o C r M d L j V r �N/ 4 q V C � O 4 W y c y rr C �O r E V V � e g q � q V L Pp ^ O C W r O yr y_ L�ni o0 S_y 4 4 V — r O c -- o e � Y v L Cry Vr 'cA O P 4100 €N r PL .r C V D.0 W <I P C O L YCi o L < � 'O•' V r 7 • • S r ^ o = c e N r P+ Y O V a S P Lr T•-1r ++Y P VOOP r_ ✓M O W C r •' =`+ vas .t Y t e s 41 r L V i 6 V y I] L r�0 V N 0 +• Tyr d ' Fp PV u T 0 y 5 P wl � IC L n Par L V L L o F e 0 7Z�� ^ T J O TgrpM v T t arC q VV�_ G QFy_` Py Oa. G E V C O C q T P V O = C e V ^L ^v ri i6 ,14'i0 CV�W� LC O G C q 4 q L W rPLg� T_ L p der q 7 P y CLuC `Y t W w t V O L •! C V N O W A� ( w Y 1 I w! CV V o r c s Vow r V _ C � O r � 6 9 i 4 W r V J V PO V �C N V — �oo e S o Z 4'z Cr 6y q O +c yCy pa01 G.: O'G >� P O E —LGIOV E O. v. P M =� C v —a O J 4 V L T o.a d � t `r n v q v T C q 6 4 V r 'O v K j P a C _ aM i 4 r C r y V V N.wV P i c ` c L— o C r M d L j V r �N/ 4 q V C � O 4 W y c y rr C �O r E V V � e g q � q V L Pp ^ O C W r O yr y_ L�ni o0 S_y 4 4 V — r O c -- o e � Y v L Cry Vr 'cA O P 4100 €N r PL .r C V D.0 W <I P C O L YCi o L < � 'O•' V r 7 • • S r ^ o = c e N r P+ Y O V a S P Lr T•-1r ++Y P VOOP r_ ✓M O W C r •' =`+ vas .t Y t e s 41 r L V i 6 V y I] L a CI'T'Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 83 -35 - REIT R - The development of a 5,6Z5 sq. ft. office building on 1/2 acre of land in the General Industrial category (Subarea 3) to be located on the southwest corner of Archibald and Arrow - APN 209 - 021 -30. I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of site playa and elevations B. Purpose: Development of a 5,625 sq. ft. office building C. '.ocation: Southwest corner of Arrow and Archibald i,. Parcel Size: Half -acre E. Existing Zoning: General Industrial F. Existing Land Use: Vacant G. Surrounding Land Use and Zonin : North - gingle Family Residential and Vacant; Low Residential and Office Professional South - Industrial; General industrial East - Commercial; General Commercial West - Industrial; General Industrial H. Generai Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial North - Low Residential and Office South - General Industrial East - Commercial West - General Industrial I. Site Characteristics: The building pad has been graded and all parking lot, street, and perimeter land improvements have been installed. ITEM N PLANNING COMMISSION DR 83 -35 /Reiter January 11, 1984 Page 2 STAFF REPORT J. P.o licable Re ulation;: The Industrial Area Specific Plan permits administrative and office uses in the General Industrial category. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: The proposed one -story office building will complete the nat phase of the Cucamonga Business Park. The building has been designed with a stronger architectural statement, while retaining the architectural character of the existing Cucamonga Business lark through the use of sandblasted concrete panels. All r.ff -site and on -site improvements have been completed with the exception of on -site landscaping around the proposed building- Design Review Committee: The Committee has reviewed this project and recommends approval of the site plan and elevations. Also. the Committee suggested, if possible, that the building be set back farther from Arrow and Archibald to provide space for additional landscaping along the streetscape. C. Environmental Review: Based upon the Initial Study, staff has found that no significant adverse impacts will occur as a result of this project. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This, project is consistent with the Industrial Area pecif7c an and General Plan. The project will not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and building design together with the recommended conditions are in compliance with the Industrial Area Specific Plan and City standards. IV. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission cons i de-F-a-7-materi al and elements of this project. If after such consideration the Commission can support the facts for findings and conditions of approval, adoption of the attached Resolution and issuance of a Negative Declaration wouid be appropriate. 1 ly Aybmi tted, Rick �omeY City Planner /RG:DC:jr Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Site Photos Exhibit "C" - Elevations & Site Plan Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval with Conditions 11 E E. -- - -- I oil 1111 If In In I Its CQ/Itlt //1 `• { �Ip titape," law r rnatauut -- 3 un Nllllnl /u� ME IN rnrear•�_ _ _- S�,MG w 71�ttON�'� Will flgnliu Ill IlpjgIP4'; �,, IIIIGG{ilul;�Nilll'��IIR1►N�(�F i � . 9 �. _ r � ;� � Ott.• :• R a.. ai. . A�• _ ��• NORTH • DFI rrEM: RANCHO CUCAMQNG 11 Y 1. i A f � �O 0 �Va i a� H 1 r c t Apn.pVNl Vr.q `Y]ffN Jp la{] "i' 1NiL iYi?`` _ ^ ��p�•• . i�rl . GYM b'TJIO-.+ _ .�J.o..' p •oer rs +aarroo srrra�rna •� - � � 0 _ S•.fS h 1! � 1 S a >r I 1 I z E YN - t L_ f�v J T if v a n I. a 1 � •1+ i'I�1� r LJ 11 C � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: $87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this M orm muse be completed and submitted to the Development - Ferie: Committee flat ^s ^,�+ *_he department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II -)f the initial Study. The Development Review Com=i.tt-e_ ,gill meet and take action no later than ten (_�) days before the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one --f three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Cucamonqa Business Park -Phase IV APPLICANT'S NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE: NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: August H Reiter, III. D -n_ Box 72a Ne:coort Beach. CA 92658 -0250 714/751 -4594 LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: One sinale story office building ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND SQUARE FOOTAGE.' OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS, IF ANY: 1/2 acre _ nn DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENT_L SETTING OF T.15M PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): Existing landscaped area with trees and crass- o animals or historical aspects_ as '"he aL c =+ivjc =.urI f 1' ^`C-•- ' c n °. of 3 5erl.°- of cumulative actions, which although individually small, may as a whole have significant environmental i.mpacz? Part of a larger project. I -2 C1 u WILL THIS PROJECT: YES NO �. 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? _ X 2. Create a substantial change in existing noise or vibration? * 3. Create a substantial change in demand for municioai services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X _ 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove: any existing trees? How many? X 6. Create the need for use or disposal of poteni:ially hazardous materials such as toxic substances, flaTmables or explosives? Explanation of any YES answers above: None IMPORTANT: If the prcject involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CERTIFICATION: I %iereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further urderstand,at additio 1 information may be required to be submitted b fore an a" uate evaluation can be made by the Developmeat Review C tee. A.H. XITEP 9EVrLQP 7 CO., A General Par e)rs ' , Date Oct. 24, _983 Signature Auau!� "Ii. Reiter, III, Partner ask Title 1-3 RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The following information should be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division in order to aid in assessing the ability of the school district to accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of Developer and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Location of Project: 1. Number of sina_le family units: 2. Number of multiple familv units: 3. Date proposed to begin construction: 4. Earliest_ date of occupancy: Model and Tentative 5. Be" ooms Price Range PEASE I PEASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 TOTAL q� /A I -4 El RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW N0. 83 -35 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARROW AND ARCHIBALD IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ZONE WHEREAS, on the 8th day of November, 1983, _ complete application wzs filed by A.M. Reiter for review of the above - described project; and WHEREr ac.., 11&i .4�.. ni lani_:ry, 10Sjd the Rancho Cucamonga AS, Vn the iau. ..) ��, - ., Planning Com.issinn held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NOW, THEREFORE, the - �'ancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resolved as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and 2. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially Is injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable erovisions of the Development Code; and 4. Tnzt the proposed project is consistent h «h the 'eneral Plan. SECTIriN 2: That this project will not create a-ierse impacts on the environment and that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 11, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 83 -35 is approved subject to the attached Standarc Conditions. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 111H DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLA "NING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY Dennis L. Stout, Chairman is ATTEST: Resolution No. Page 2 I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January, 1964, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: CCMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: :"I SSLiNERS: E. �J E 0 z 1 d O d E E ey a O• 6 � O M P L L V c C � C V Q C M C C V .j G � < N 0 r o = O V O g N rl CJ dCO d_C O_C_M Z C V `OT r = r V o .JY C: C� ycc O d La P r r C nn �y Y P O N °y OV�� C�6 NNVC Yu �� — dLr �� ,O el• Y re �� Y V r%I� J N y y •J '- 4. y d ` C C O C9 �.. •• LN.. of >< < c ° °. G O d o -.5 Wg V� OO V L��r LCO OPQI ry Vy Lr 4- _ N a 4 N— 4 q �� f �d � •� � O w N O � d �� �_ C ° I O �N <ao Rou =' V N 1 �I L C Y Rq r CN wy 4r- .'� _ Y r 4a _V rV G NYC C_O C g N Gr 1� j�IC 00 �_ 0q O O-L 6p G O `D LYC -00 .d.- YfYx C$'ONr Q dTV C �d ML.y CC — q P w 4_` LV 4�emc E O-N _ _ 6 •ISM �O' - 0�wr OPC >OC Oi bi ^I ml wl i I V {VG V6Y � < O, C I rl CJ dCO d_C O_C_M Z C V `OT r = r V IdL .JY C: C� 'i'C La �.. •• LN.. of >< < c ° °. G O d o -.5 4- _ I O �N L ^N OD V N 1 �I L C Y Rq I �_ 0q O-L 6p G O `D 4G a aL •ISM �O' - 0�wr OPC >OC Oi C, > C Y Y O L V {VG V6Y �dVO < O, C 6Vr •I I j iti r� py0 41 z ^� _ rl 4T- O O �cw WPr -Yi -Vr Pli -io Tr�LN -u ecO V r C O C N L q •.. � r L y� rL.n °_ J 2 n .J C °� L C L ` O Vi 2 V 4 •+ .LI 2­ ry a FrV do �p �6 7 4 C d q p n. u .['i c O. p ray s o n r E r r 9• y c N 4 b 4 V G n 4 o— 'b ooq L r �r N p> 9 N N 6 mac.` = iar)E:u VV9 =�_° >.°� -•v °.' Y9N =eio rc L .L°.. °9 nE °Vya nCgi d "C E;C L O E 9 p a r p N'��•CC' 4rCOw V y O r r w Y¢ C T �e +� G a m,� E w 4 Y, G C i •brr V QO PV E .a... O.� - y e 4 • 6 •` d V C 4 J V r0 C d r G��° C V E r y` NIDY V •3 6WLV 7 `l QO Vp = N r- G _N •°,.�D p..pL 0 V` � V` a n > U ofi�y V z.ri i I Cd °O g L y N `. >pO ` p VV6� <CN 0 O Tom] p p y L G L i Pau'C 11GG iC VAC L 4 N C C r G r r �+ •Q r qOw `p -= raNOC yy O t eP` O• r °ip� rV r C N G� w r rLCCV ° w O rCV�O�� °�� E 7 r L r O p s b r j Tw O< P C •n c Gy@ O G 2 q� c$'rrrN O V. O i fi e q O `C SV+r 4 D�.av2� rC eS:,J. r4r $e 0 °N 9 -Z.4 r 2 L i >O' pp r C p O O C -j.2 9 OZ—, 0C lV L --rCq r p n 0 V 6 NPNrO J G N a l G b rCC -'rL<4 r9 .°. C rJ r V O T•' q C� G C O+ .Li. G O° r per r O O 4 C^ r e t e g y APL ° r O r ° rE rim V= DL V O Vr �NL' OV tG C< -` r V N Y C n° V U V i •"' i O i 6 � p PT _ IyCC C__V> LC9 at p P r r V4 r Y G+ >C V� =Or _ w w oz O n p -J � C °r C w= ny 4 d C! n i c t '� � C� n= a T V� a •n { p -' P " o L �u+c �.°. rOL N9n 9 G�FjgL ao YiI _o r" 4 r c �. O T c °° V C. C 4y Y 2WY•P o V y perVNG�V VO y yee 4 O L O C C > I PO p C Q L -� C NdG i P V q° •+ u V Y y� r 4 4 v 4a'sYNCyCN�r v� r r G � C� C r ar�0 7 Q C L__ ONw L z O r L r OO H 9 N N t•J O rLrr C r O C < E r 6 L n O l 6 G <^ S N� N L -• 6� V 9 6p 2 9 2 N TI < p N J� C I( O 4T- Cr ° p( -Tp �9 rrC 4_ pOTV a r N < V r C O C N L q •.. � r L y� rL.n °_ J 2 n .J C °� L C L ` O Vi 2 V 4 •+ .LI ry a 7 4 C d q p o t j �yDi n r E r r 9• 4 M O N 4 V G n 4 O << V 6 L r N ` r N p> 9 N N 6 mac.` = r..y °9rV M�p•O =eio rc .L°.. L O � 9 p a r =3 y w° 5 r O r r w Y¢ L '^r c 1 �e Ee5 PO.0 V O p y C C V OL C 4 • 6 •` C f e G . C d r G��° C V E r < S n r N 2 � � o CCVOr a n L •O r V 4 ofi�y y4 z.ri o .'SGrjb L i icoc -• r y O G i � y r �+ C T n Y+ V °2 O• °ip� rV c r o� P L e• CLV .0 rCV�O�� O< P C •n c Gy@ O G 6T C y@ O : °gt vvgL e' 4�a eS:,J. r4r $e LvG,n P O V Q L C U G O V 6 NPNrO F=rt+ NSr Py rCC -'rL<4 O w 4 d p C rJ r V O T•' q C� G C O+ .Li. G O° r per r N O O 4 C^ r e t e g y APL C' Y6'PrM° TV nV PrG� ��L DL r7r Or-�7 Vr �NL' OV tG �N p P r r O V r Y G+ « r( V w oz WI C• S� .1 i; o� �I 11 C C r O r V •" 9 L .LI 4D Lr a 7 4 C d q p r j �yDi n r 9• 4 M O N 4 V G Yp L V nVr b L O � � • O =3 r O r r w Y¢ L '^r c 1 �e Ee5 PO.0 V O p y C C V N Mr _ _•L..r V � � L CCVOr y'J N 4 C V r 2 G i w a y r C T n Y+ V p� O• o rLP�E r6 =LC✓ P -L ° ✓LY'� WN • AL NY Y✓r w0 � c a v =Vag r E' gCi7 ��Y✓O = �O. NVi C YC Yv C EE —VOCI r Ow( pnpV yr1 q °NLY C J n(y�9 V PG N +Sa YLpp _SJ{,I 'yyP IV �qp O Dn ° - g L 4 i N 1 V P ✓ a .. ✓ D° c N o n G% CL�N +�C. C rn d Ln L -Gy..w C° O•J LOCL JpLy CPw ✓yV 6�q =00002 �- - ad 'O OL GY -� ! _ C •NI L'1= CLLY YIC 8.2 - NDP _c1 SI i ✓ Li _ ••'00 C O 3` a 2�l V °C iZ6 oEOy �oYg>'N `Y T ryry y E. N C nr O� .}y N J �C° P.—.. N N i Y S C 1` O y n e N Q �. Y• ° G —Li L L P l � O C _�f. 1� + CD6 O aC P7•n Cam' 'ON C` na✓ �� ✓° '. GO V >. q •� C V V P'w ' O r N V a• V CV 0 P• ! O C.. YV— P9 9 !c N06 Vt7a0 ✓ _ —NUCG =YC C a CY ��O —e rPP "C n✓ P L£ L4 v q Y Y- ✓ °Y ° e� ° ±� - ° >c `o- -° •o•- c�-�MP � q. n� + � N u H M W . r. l- L .Vr. ✓ r `• p V� .qr C�� V v C 6 m O V Na O " O L P6n _ _ C n q C ° r °� O d� L� d = D r ✓ v u✓ M 6 C O d 3.Oi V C �' ��' V G' ✓ .� d O d �' O U_ C C M ti V L N ° d5 C 4 d ` >.'• °= 0 = V 2Z = V U yE p C p� C y V_ n C ✓ _ r O O e 4 ✓ P C N =� O N. Y= % V 1 q `Y i� r C P- •^ � N S d N N O O O 1_ _�� S s ° ✓ T V O ~ ✓ r < C '+ Q— r P "' u C q N 'J C. V_ P 1 0 4 `;.2 cc ' �r L ✓ ✓dOS °q °N ` C_t` —VV� 1_� n Y. _b q c C L N V r ✓ C O °? y O i = n` a d_ i' O P.3 d G D C J W V L O O V D •r. t a. C� N rJV G✓ L V =N QpIpO 1. —�L'y' D N Y a I C C y V u pry C d O_ V L V� 4✓ 7° r d_ G ° q n ✓ Z; d O D. 6C'O C.r = `0= N V- i_ -✓ V g LP B N v Q ✓ N e Q= r ✓ Y N N w O r 4' - �_ L .5 rF 'w `IOV 6f.i PPi pO lir, Z rL J•�•^ S` CP�000 )• G - C + C C 4 Y C V� E Y V ✓ N N N •r L 6 n � p �✓ < t° � OM -q d <-•' Ga u YMOO.IN� r S M <N� <a <N INS V V f� Cyr L• A N Ii • N q N 10 m v 11 11 �iO °V LP P 4P� T iG �46• OLS_V C� L d + ° O .J r •J 9 p O• l_ G V L 4 p N m C V y/ !{Cyyy d U Ew.r Pp AI �'�1rCpV O Ov r9 4 TJWL O cc m _ C 4O c `4d L ^ J C � )'• O DV S _ 4+ Y n p N CO rrM —E P o v�� p °�' Na n °+ S 6 Nc «PT.Ji. 2.1 i P +did ?ydDC d N° ° Dr O � PPnV TDy Vq`r�./ LO_n0V pT EO N SM C. .nV PV d•nr d� E nW j•--'r .^a �° .^ Ce CL C4 � ^L OiIJ -.O O� �- � N V O U — -J 6 •r. - d 9 C E 0� N 9 d° q C m— =cE rdL ?nd+ `• o —q•J s —e d ed c a`�nD'.°..n °` = : °.c r+ ivDJ .: •°�cd �. Yv rSn u�usa� cav �`o •I N! ^I �! I I y � I �I � u�� I -J Y Esc y \r0 ° I o ti°, 22:5 CZ— • y •Li• a9 w °V ^.L..60 ve l 1P V V g V�n� I I s dL _ r= ro d 4 _ d 4.Ji. O NSJ °ir <p +�y ^ L Y C69 G C e•�r Ldp Nt +O` C 4 T�m\ P\ L_C + V 9 .w 0 °L 40 rEC.0 4• Q r .. r6 d —5v p^ C' _ Nr •Vi•a��. —_ N «EO � —_ E —J9CL '^N� V i00 L TO-• Or c V C E N L O °i r tJod uyC O O L d =° 40 TOd O OL 3• aQ °V° I =— G rVW t. L i°r N = 41 1I v 11 11 E G� O. f a N a C V O 2 5` V r N r C �' r q d Y - r - C V q N0. V P j � N .00. L q� N Or �v ca OpM ° F V q V > C > p QO O O P C � L v r d V C l PH S V S S N p �I I v V tV ° O � ) N O y q CZ L r. S Gym 9 N C ) O V 8� n � M O � Q I L O P ry E :p L- G L P C O u O I O �N V � � O r0 NJ 1 1 CiJ IN 2 u t G r.0ul+u m `• ,7:1 C c e' V - ^I u r N vC O P v P r q M C V 9 C P L rJ r �J 9y L O q • N V� V O C C P C V ° _ O L O V � SOO TOr rrCOa_L � Vd_ SV �OVa 0g0I L'° C � Li L I I I y1 V ry t`em D � I 9+ y O CV L y `•N dLVP O'n rrJ O N "' = i O V i V t Zt `fi r .i a ow.a L °aay = rOr N V O -0.04 O` d -L [CyO a -.q q� �Lq T4 ES I I i O. L4 N OqN VV4 S•e D_V) �Cd a0``'0 �4LC KI 4G V I I I `� r .^ .2 C y � y rwO = 0 ri� rVVO Py 01 =:V =P �I CC �N I Vi S Z Vyy�. ° °� N r z . �ET� LV9> CONa.aO N I a 0.P V N 4YS JtX a O cz wmDd cOVVO PV OI °I -y I I I :- `Ta t q L V O V QI SI OO Oa. 'I 1 rr VO M a, r In OCR G V, V. Y ar � L •I V MD '� P L ,V V � � � r C° Y N N r jr E D L TV. O N O I O qi d a I O lVV V 5a O N V C � R O4 O O C r Y O r i � N - z. •. `�y SD �°r T C O YfI COI ^I I CJI PI I E G� O. f a N a C V O 2 5` V r N r C �' r q d Y - r - C V q N0. V P j � N .00. L q� N Or �v ca OpM ° F V q V > C > p QO O O P C � L v r d V C l PH S V S S N p �I I v V tV ° O � ) N O y q CZ L r. S Gym 9 N C ) O V 8� n � M O � Q I L O P ry E :p L- G L P C O u O I O �N V � � O r0 NJ 1 1 CiJ IN 2 u t G r.0ul+u m `• ,7:1 C c e' V - ^I u r N vC O P v P r q M C V 9 C P L rJ r �J 9y L O q • N V� V O C C P C V ° _ O L O V � SOO TOr rrCOa_L � Vd_ SV �OVa 0g0I L'° C � Li L I I I y1 V ry t`em D � I 9+ y O CV L y `•N dLVP O'n rrJ O N "' = i O V i V t Zt `fi r .i a ow.a L °aay = rOr N V O -0.04 O` d -L [CyO a -.q q� �Lq T4 ES I I i O. L4 N OqN VV4 S•e D_V) �Cd a0``'0 �4LC KI 4G V I I I `� r .^ .2 C y � y rwO = 0 ri� rVVO Py 01 =:V =P �I CC �N I Vi S Z Vyy�. ° °� N r z . �ET� LV9> CONa.aO N I a 0.P V N 4YS JtX a O cz wmDd cOVVO PV OI °I -y I I I :- `Ta t q L V O V QI SI OO Oa. 'I 1 rr VO M a, r In E E O Y � L L + V �. (L V O ._ 1 1• r N v t .. V - Z r aqZ )w VC L G • L < �•p 0p 0 A � w �" I I � a N � 6• r v � roc nc �� 90 s`oN` e I qd4 s• q o p _ •_ V O C � L L YO I. Yi d OI p _ - � >C o• -_ $ L L PC A�Jyp _.- VC LN V � V y 6 O C'T I VP �� 11V p C O Mp0 GM Y< 6a V� + V! fC TO -_•y rO Va >� OGO T °I 6P M ( CVp w rp w O- Jp ^ a L nod aYa �9 VL Id � vi.� y �` r ° = Y�"•N rf'� � I ��.� 3w Jl '.rq .Til- ti.L.• I I <w Gw� <� cI G7 64N O - W r •1 N ^I `I •(� d wI C - I I i I I I I pl I I �I � 2 V C V •�` ^� N L �r 0- COL = O J O i 0 O O - C 3 i •_i• I V l O p J O a N� q tI O � O _ V r •n O. p � 0• M 6 r L S q •+ •+ ` C j P 0 N � U n i N � V L r � G N ``O A ` V r n• � -i. O� O. � r 9 L N V P O Y V q w y' G ��< r � M a oacN N dio � .•y �° <j 'L o° cv ter. i.' !e Ud- ^ca .. G •°. "� - pa.r �� � _r c a r P P L U •° O d n _ � j? dE`r..L o Cd dr EO 4'dlu a I $O CO Cgg6d V V`p G= _ <<u• <; al PV Or nVQ !n � O ' M V n= L w� T Y e y <• d 9 v L N G V r- r� G 'n �[� I� OdC pLlc = `iV NV�y P �aT rV Ca Vp'�• 1 '^- L <`JC YVVO a N iP C rpu q.L.• C•n TV 3_ ry V V V.L.• V C O. r_ d P C d �• V d ° y �� NO�O __ SG Vp < V �f D•MV v�6W <•L.••Li• NwV 6�� <V 6� �rN V f N V 0 P cs r r - r i E E U 01 •"7 0 L 1 11" 1 n P V P T l Y O I I � •Ow d r Ii 4 °_E N O v r CO a Ld O• �� S—„V 4y dr qb i ♦C OtY V, �V I I 00 _ O ?L Y�N �� -J9 �� 4•-r � Y•C t6 GJVfi a 11 11 11 Crf-Y OF P.ADiCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Curt Johnston, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INS ERMtTRO - The development of a zv,iyu sq. rt. industrial uiiding addition on 8.82 acres of land in the General Industrial category (Subarea 3), located on the south side of Arrow Route between Hellman Avenue and Helms Avenue - APN 209 - 022 -01. Related File: Parcel Map 8280 I. PROJECT AND SITE DESCR. ?TION: A. Action Requested:_ Approval of a precise site plan and building elevations, and issuance of a Negative Declaration B. Pur ose: Construction of a 29,790 sq. ft. industrial building a itjon C. Location: South side of Arrow Route between Hellman Avenue and Helms Avenue 0. Parcel Size: 8.82 acres E. Exist in' Zonin : Industrial Area Specific Plan, General In dustria category (Subarea 3) F. Surroundins Land Use and Zonin : North - Single ami ty u ivision, "L" (2 -4 du /ac) South - Industrial Businesses, General Industrial (Subarea 3) East - Vacant, Industrial Businesses, General Indus,rial (Subarea 3) West - Industrial Businesses, Vacant, General Industrial /Rail Served (Subarea 2) ITEM 0 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR 83- 34 /Intermetro January 11, 1984 Page 2 1 H. General Plan Designations - Project Site - General Industrial North - "L" (2 -4 du /ac) South - General Industrial East - General Industrial West - General Industrial /Rail Served ....____�1.. 7c dGr. �., f# Size Character 13 L i l:Z,: tUl 9cn�I�, u ", "'° -�• manu acturing act ity and an older single family home in gooa condition exist on the property. Vegetation on the vacant portion of the property is limited to indigenious weeds and grasses. II. ANALYSIS: A. General: This application was submitted in conjunction with arrcTMap 8280, also on tonight's agenda for your review (Exhibit "H"). This project is the first phase of expansion plans for Intermetro Industries. A conceptual :Waster plan outlining the future development is shown on Exhibit "D". The actual amount of building coverage shown on the plan may be altered based upon the amount of on -site parking required. B. Desi r. Review Committee: The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the exterior building elevations-, which are designed to match that of the existing building. The Committee also commented that the current pattern of roof equipment on the existing building shall not be continued unless architecturally screened from public view per the Industrial Specific Plan requirements. Also, a condition of approval is recommended to continue the ivy planting on the north elevation. C. Development Review Committee: The Development Review Committee review t e project and determined that, with the recommended conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. With development of the project, the applicant will be responsible for installation of missing street improvements on the south side of Arrow Route. Cn Heilman Avenue, the roadbed must be reconstructed on both sides of the centerline with curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the east side. A condition or approval is provided to credit the reconstruction west of the centerline on Hellman Avenue towards systems development fees or other reimbursement by the City. Additional landscaping will also be installed along the street frontages of Hellman and Arrow, around the perimeter of the existing house, and in the new parking lot south of the building addition. 11 r1 L PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OR 83- 34 /Intermetro January 11, 1984 Page 3 D. Grading Committee: The Grading Committee reviewed and approved The conceptua grading plan with minor conditions necessary to meet City standards. A final grading plan with the appropriate corrections will be required prior to issuance of building permits. C r....:. a., +,� es<o<,�hr• Part I of the Initial Studv nas Seen Nie:e by the applicant. Staff has completed the Environmental Checklist and found no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this protect. If the Commission concurs with these findings, issuance or a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. III. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: This project is consistent with the Industrial Area Specific an and General Plan. The proposed use, building design, and site plan, together with the recommended conditions of approval, is in compliance with all applicable City standards and ordinances. In addition, the project will not be detrimental to the adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. IV. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised for environmental review in The Daily Report newspaper. V. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider -!I input and elements of this project. If after such consider the Commission can support the facts for findings, adoption of the attached Resolution would be appropriate. Respe,ktfu l l y ,"bn,i tted , Rick C16mez/ City Planner i 112:CJ:jr i Attachments: Exhibit Er.nibit Exhibit exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit Initial Resolut "A" - Location Map & Industrial "B" - Site �Jtilization Map "Cu - Detailed Site Plan "Du - Master Plan "E" - Building Elevations "F" - Floor Plan "G" - Conceptual Grading Plan "H" - Parcel Map 3280 Study, Part I ion of Approval with Conditions Specific Plan ij r - •._. -. �• –�•.� � �. "vim %', ". "'. - `-I ra�wa•`--rrr^ —° = .sI> I -LT/1 �� r (oPA1 Y� ;fb ............ - -- --.... 1 IVpu 'T . IZA T. `! �•i�i �a�••� .•- Q;,�II i 5 ILA: •,• �1 �; t .il�Fley�sfb'1_ -� I I,�'��y.��l:.Va.2 ? i r Q! • n YTS - � -�.�. _ -fir• __._._ F •. • I2 �'' � �1 wla�sre��Csv5�1��J `I 91 NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO Ct CAMONGk TmF -< ARROW ROUTE Mew Ac7prrlct4 I, I' 1 a Y h � 7 —I 1 1 1 i I CITY OF ram: - _37Q-e675 -34 19LA INNG Di rNON EXHIMT- SCALE-- I d `• cd b �r � i n AIMMM /iii — I 1 V Y 1 11 1 t JJ H NORTH CITY OF ram: - _37Q-e675 -34 19LA INNG Di rNON EXHIMT- SCALE-- a` il ix T� i ¢ 4 ' ' LL _ 1 i - ---- - - - --- I �� CFY OF ITEM: TT-e!5-3! Ff,AN'NING DIVISM EXI-HIBii= "V `r SCALE - � —y '1 I� M Not *. Eiiu��ow 1 vY To SE 7sicr47+0c� "fo M�Li i Wes+ Ea+ w Iz ` D E , l r M Mks nay.. CITY OF rMN1= 32 - 4 RLii ' CDl.ATMG 71'I'l..E= /LDi�f6 Erra�,4-rta�� PL A.NN iVG DIVSK) I EXiiIB[ E _ "E' " SCALE: i � 1 1 � � y\ M I � I I� 1 4 I - lJ I /\ NORTH crry OF 83- RAIVC�-iC� C7 JCAMQNGAL Tm.E- F R PLANNNG DWSM EXHIBIT - cfztl SCALE: � x LI � r Z s c If -.1 i. G a: �i -yy 4 � (ti �+• � sac" CC MR•ON D•D a i *y ..� �•. err > �- �'- 'fr1��� 3 II Ii .a =i I� 11 I I lay 7♦ 17 � ` I• 'a♦ a I 1 i 19ORT3 SEMa CITY OF � q IZAl� C )CAMONCA 'i"PIU: C,2� rat PLANNING DP4S N EXHIBff °� SCALE: _ _._ 11 11 E II II C II T I o it o II � ° U II tl y � II _ 6 II II II � II II I 1 i 19ORT3 SEMa CITY OF � q IZAl� C )CAMONCA 'i"PIU: C,2� rat PLANNING DP4S N EXHIBff °� SCALE: _ _._ 11 11 El I %v+ I+ue/sswi.ic a c�G...- .a/cVa �u�+uris a..as' , 14AR `EZ SAP A14b. /V' Tw! C /TY O/ AA.yC.wG C1IG'•�.'iG4AO.+ • I Q�...c O.v.raa.v r .. ra�� /o+r ar r,w /4.�rw• �wr - I w.w.i o� srr Ive.►>r�wr•Yr GI ✓�C✓+�nrs ar'sfri S�rrw Yli t rr G.r- 4u.vrr� <�Strro.v b 73.�wr.�.� /Sr.raw; J R...vM 7Nlsr 3O. H. w a- Ca...vrs rSw.v�ow.wm.men� -I I LccR� GL�O Ewc..vlr��us• .n.b .AwwYirc Cdw.rr. S�vC. II• �✓t« �. I ♦ /'1� /aRTLL.I iPGUf6 � � �r.1�n� 2 d � n jai G a a FJ.RCtt ti •Z i 4i �� SI Ly tr .vry- r ✓n.JrZ JEe /o siJ�a✓ NOK --i CITY OF 1TEbt: � T �!1 RAI CV NINIlJi ' mu: Ysi xj' - 'P M. 8280 PLAN, NL 4G ICI -ISM E- XM3rr: '__ SCkU: - t I:'.Y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA INITIAL STUDY PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION SHEFi - To be completed by applicant Environmental Assessment Review Fee: S87.00 For all projects requiring environmental review, this form must be completed and submitted to the Development Review Committee through the department where the project application is made. Upon receipt of this application, the Environmental Analysis staff will prepare Part II of the Initial Study. The Development Review Committee will meet and take action no later than ten (10) days befox'e the public meeting at which time the project is to be heard. The Committee will make one of three determinations: 1) The project will have no signi- ficant environmental impact and a Negative Declaration will be filed, 2) The project will have a significant environmental impact and an Environmental Impact Report will be prepared, or 3) An additional information report should be supplied by the applicant giving further informa- tion concerning the proposed project. PROJECT TITLE: Factory and Warehouse Addition APPLICANT`S WAME, ADDRESS, -LzLEPHONE: NAME, ADDRES', TELEPHONE OF PERSON TO BE CONTACTED CONCERNING THIS PROJECT: Douai as R. Dean, 1519 West D `. LOCATION OF PROJECT (STREET ADDRESS AND ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.) 9393 Arrow Highway. Rancho Cucamonga CA _ LIST OTHER PERMITS NECESSARY FROM LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE AGENCY ISSUING SUCH PERMITS: None I -1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:_ 90' x 331' addition to existing factory ACREAGE OF PROJECT AREA AND. SQUARE FOOTAGE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS. IF ANY_ _d n rrelc tntalinn G A =,.ac evieti DESCRIBE THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING-OF THE PROJECT SITE INCLUDING INFORMATION ON TOPOGRAPHY, PLANTS (TREES), ANIMALS, ANY CULTURAL, HISTORICAL OR SCENIC ASPECTS, USE OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, AND THE DESCRIPTION OF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES AND THEIR USE - (ATTACH NECESSARY SHEETS): CJ Is the project part of a larger project, one of a series of c-=ulative actions, whic.'z although individually wall, may as a whole have significant environmental impact? No. We will continue land use as it has been used in the past. 11 I —P .A WILT. THIS PROJECT: ,T'S NO 1. Create a substantial change in ground contours? X 2. Create a substantial change in existing " — noise or vibration? X 3. Cr2at2 s _z^st� ^.tia1 chance in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)? X 4. Create changes in the existing zoning or general plan designations? X 5. Remove any existing trees? How many? X b. Create the need for use or disposal of potentially hazardous :materials such as toxic substances, f lammables or explosives? Explanation of any `.ES answers above: ! POHTANT: If the project involves the construction of residential units, complete the form on the next page. CEPTIFT_CnTION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of :my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional - ir.fo_maticn may be required to be submitted before an adecuate evaluation can be made by the Development Review Committee. Daterl -., ;1I 195 Sicnature Title Manager Manufacturing Enginetar ;na 1-3 r. RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION The follow , information should be provided to the City of R Planning /t:.vision in order to aid in assessing the ability of district �o accommodate the proposed residential development. Name of De loper and Tentative Tract No.: Specific Locat7or_ of Project: PHASE I PHASE 2 PHASE 3 1. Number of single family units: 2. Number of multiple family units: 3. Date proposed to begin constructio*i: 4. Earliest date of occupancy• Model and # of Tentative 5. Bedrooms Price a i2anc�e 9 Cucamonga school PHASE 4 TOTAL, 1-4 Ae 0 C RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 83 -34 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE BETWEEN HELLMAN AVENUE AND HELMS AVENUE IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CATEGORY (SUBAREA 3) WHEREAS, on the 21st day of October, 1983, a complete application was filed by Inter:netro Industries Corp. for review of the above- described project; and WHEREAS, on the 11th day of January, 1984, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a meeting to consider the above - described project. NCW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission resoived as follows: SECTION 1: That the following can be met: 1. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Industrial Specific Plan and the purposes of the zone in which the use is proposed; and "c. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and 3. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Industrial Specific Plan; and 4. That the proposed project is ;onsistent with the General Plan. SECTION 2: That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and tthiat a Negative Declaration is issued on January 11, 1984. SECTION 3: That Development Review No. 83 -34 is approved subject to the followin�` g conditions and attached Standard Conditions: PLANNING DIVISION 1. The current pattern of roof equipment an the existing building shall not be continued on the proposed addition unless appropriately screened from public view as per Industrial Specific Plan requirements. Resolution No. Page 2 2. Ivy shall be planted along the north wall of the proposed addition ti match that which is on existing building. Details shall be indicated on the landscape and irrigation plans required prior to issuance of building permits. 3. The master plan for this site, submitted with the application, is for conceptual purposes only, znd mc� be altered curing Develol —. 2nt 1GV :cii fvr faatairc building proposals in order to comp'y with City standards and ordinances. 4. The trash bins currently kept along the Helms Avenue Street frontage shall be screened and /or removed from public view ENGINEERING, DIVISION 5. On Heilman Avenue the existing PCC pavement beyond the centerline of the street shall be removed and replaced with a minimum of 6" of asphalt concrete. This work will be subject to credit towards Systems Development fees or other reimbursement by the City. 6. All conditions of Parcel Map 8280 are applicable to this development approval. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1984. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8Y: D?nnis L. Stout, Chairman ATTEST: I, , Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of January, 1984, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ASSENT: COMMISSIO14EPS: 11 11 ��' °O�i C°T M CPS ✓LV —V— V°O YC 6E e_TP Y ✓Of OTp Ctl OV_OV VO.L.r LSD Ll9 tl a6 J O {� iP � 4 » _U �V ♦•VC �LUr viy✓ T� em�� V -- 9N taG� C L_ ° q"�> y � c � c � > d. L o � � c a• r— N G .= n 6 tl— a � j C ° O_ y Lp L C` P�p L n _rr N Y� •'Oj• 6 C 4! P L •LI• « tl C Yp 4 Y V V✓ 9 _ pS tl ✓? r b L > ^ _ l y >a Pc Z w � C� °C • O V C � _ O�� 4_ a. V✓ y _r«� N D tl 9 Y V p r L a V CC • tl 4« tl Z L = C V r ` N V L_ ✓ O O� O r 4'i °CV Vt O� �i6 w� � =� =tl.•. E_° r JC Od LP+ .rl V J _q DO✓ 4 r0 Vy99ZL y «Op L >V= rpj y p— tl =r y C C �— r pV � � ✓_ L C D L_� R� N G ! V D N A � ✓_ i �� • =n moo. _ _ y� ✓C N jC « <V Z. =V�d ✓ �✓ NrL. Cr1' og o�i� y'rco r-0�.4 L„La yE � vJO rr yp• Shy 9 W o Yr,J•, ap YL: ✓�, Y•o n•Li•__O N Vp>tl. CPSY _ � •nWtl— —< CJ y _ C L C« N ,w V _ P C« r O. = L L• l� M N L� N y n PV P C T M O N { N1 L tl p p✓ p O C C C 4! —� r E — � O P✓ C r L °y N V 'L Y d° tln OL O• V C S« « ✓_ "' 4 ° C o C Ql C° Ctt■lr �V� y�,L' /L �J �__p 6aa C•; Q° dd 6'• PL VSO yam= ��O ✓{ Td fi N� trtY `n =L A. ✓' r `d VQ y >, r a• C C V T C y L ` e P c L L y p L �pC G1w C� ^4 + °G °•n yis C OR => �qC C e ° CYY_ Vr . y C' •^_ •.�� C C< PP O P E wrV VG•> L °C « V e a' O V° L C ✓} w ^ Y> V •°p Y 6 C° s/ 9 •Jw r V Q M 9« it, t ✓n 0 9 V = V 4 C J 9 to s ti O• _ •Li• Fp m 6VL t O.LO <JnV L «6L (4VM1 6« � HC «O n U 0 i 0 yz� FC S O Ll V g K N e Y Ire rz° yLL i..t e4 Via_ «v •e` u GG C I « � d • N P L y _ � 4 `• •� 4 — C •o 21 �« °4— nr� _ qo gip` w WQG VE CtlJC �d e.L.. V '� G •_ L_ Cf � LO a y 4 L =✓ O g Ca_ 6L �9 tr C_ er S GCi rC� ft"� 9 CO J oP •„Cn 1 � 2I `6I $.0 ✓ O Q tlO yr O a ` C4C C G L w L s — L v O ` O d J a C O 6 M✓ C Z O n s L 4 N 6 n •� H~ l y4r NC •Ln ad tl 4� Y O O C C C ayy/ � �CC a'tl yCCd � Lr ' P yNN ° CL �c C .tl.. �` Cf N� _6 Y d 6 G C Cp �� �L V_ V O. J o pC V e V! _ V O. V I n L n r tl .1 a O z V w < m . v M V I L ° i a ✓ C Z � ✓ U Y c 0 � Z d f O � 4 V � a O ° V L ° J - H P y O C N 'LJ gC a N= 8r ra L c M V r e P - �: Gt W G E� dg I _r0 V ✓ Y C V •-O E ne ° C � � =E4E w L e O � U VV r C ° v Y c w G N + O N Q JN ° « V C TO i C v °g8o Lr ep nL O Cn T,a + C n. V C _ Y Y P ✓ . Y L a� Eil�c c✓ °N L� r .'S w 4 L y C T n� Z V OV n 5P n e � n V E Ow -.t O S P. O•-9 C L « a °c� +ate k ° V v y L V 'n L ✓ ° S V C O N a4i �tgg "Loo wl Y �Vr P✓ i Y �✓ Lam- �an. ° rZV�AiO. •6 L A _aoggo_ a < U J r NeO -L i�� V Ct J�i ✓ V I ro a •D YO c w _ 8 V e 6< ^ V r_gc ea VnViJa ✓• yC �O�e� pr ' Ye ✓��E 6a ^ ✓ O y N ° O V✓ N P ` C y y V W 4 N N Y cE�wcay 6+ i N 9 N<✓ �' ai �C�C T�✓WLN �4 Cce YP L.NGC�r`J'J -✓ ...t O p O^ V L Y 4^ r t V 1L Uw Y Vq� W M5 VpV 4 L •� C L IT VEr�oNG PO'• qPL V C y a C p CV° � ��✓✓ °Lw G '� °~Y w�NV`SO✓ Its V° Y X E w'_ r O C S V ✓ E « 0 9 p« c r O °�- �y e( .�Cye rYCWN CyaY d y v °cs_ ar L rr.r .O � OV wv✓ C ° �° N9` T 6n +T p'•'�y C V7 r J Val c.°. ni.Y a` L o° ° i g vNVC' b $' L NPn c✓ SO yvc y= C °.o Y M5 +o•a .mi PV �°,` Rio _✓ y�ye C Cd C +w�Y C p.4Q OCE QE y 2 n ^ -_ L t N •) _ y p ^= V d y1 P N r ,T N - � -� 4 V i r r. < L w y J` f .• T CC C� o G O 8 V a_ < L J � � N �✓ O C l J W. e t C. a n Y r � i n P 0 L�%z ' O- Vg tt s�l+p �_WS Vr C9�6LC bC° ci e T T° CV VO�wj 6� y�".N N ° C NC �O. COV r N P O W l ° C -L S N VP C q c'L• C °° 4 Ce y C °- C p S= ° V d ` °° d N J 1 --9,78,2 ng p y yC(F y r C 9< V 9 O C= V 7 V i L d V � 6 v C L D N O 7 a M C N✓ r C V e L V y ✓ .. ycit PL°p �pCrw� .•P °�^ Lc .-i C C ✓° y - -_ C" V V Q^ p a p 0 C N y E J i G cC g °ee P �r ° C N O O yn t2: N- <-MD q - El u C f° L i= Oa7 cGC C° 'Z s e N u9 b r = OrpC i G w. e C C�� 9 v > G _n \ �I r p .••� e O y e� L roc o E`Lp>� Lu �r Oi• r _ ag= Cr bo �r ` ryOOiw L r GV� ` —1 r V °LV NOyJ �TpT L � r. o7z p y r r rj T�OL V— 'o YG P Le O O 1 C LG O 6V ,O 6 ` C' �L 4� 1Y •J[ �N Q�CO y1 —_ dCe C_S ,Y,G�u �.V �r •rn r`O _ V L N wO S ` tP��V�• 'e C^ YjLi >VY OC Y p>� Op i •� AGM Y PV CN = V yy �' 'a •n V N r $ L i 6Y =`' TYV CL C Vvr JET e - CCO N ^Y S VL• �4pCP LO V•ri•v C '��P —L� °i V� <r ABC V= =C� O ^ •r C V V T N t C_ NG -V� O O Yp CyG� Yee rN^ +P—•O• Y6 6w O+ rC <Y�06 <V �Gw �•»V+ NNY 3M� yL9� ����� <P� OV r .,T •r V d P E C G 4 � m p P V � Y 1 Y V C d C N V a[ ° r O C G •°n v O V r G O m = r V V r .`.. y r 2 L O` G TV'.'`i Y0 C'ev O dC0 �i G —C O Nr !p Na_ .r..•l� V LrL•^ P °� ° E� 6. °v O - .r.• �p6 PC .-C, •"' �' C p C V °1 ° C 1 e a V ° 1 t i �•'•O yr O p° ey �L ° 1. P _a °a s u L,•N' E'J 1 E CC jL 0 OC r T `Y J t - rV 0 G° N V s V y= VLO G N _ •'na =! c Z:5 CV p G _`.NL rp C� �r °7M= r • -P y VGN rF,.t Crf r C 6 C CVOE YY��1p_CA^ LSO r _ Cj' _ C P Y 2 j NY a r� N Cr per° iLp�l G� +rO �pC O M S ^Gp V` r '0 c, Y-Y ^r J V— 4rC °rV L G ° O.^ r =w C' O.O °fit PraC T `OyC I` 4V•. PN NN N y V M V s Q L O 6 w •Vr• q C T �_ ■�� y rp yC u,. C�� C° O ��V M °.. QS6n, •V••rNV �Lp` S <`^ Y N(/' !Y NLr -_ r° ° V ''pQ ' y C V y N 'a m O r^ •n L 4^ V Li•^ rOrL r�,L,� Y`�O� <rVOy ° yO OCy La pGOP =0y C � (C� +OV =�•_� Grp `°�= ^p_�� S•Li•^ f pO,�GQV M'! V ]� )� C _ �8r CC= d•Vi•r�r f� •.L 5V =_NNN� V G 6 O i Vy __• Y r= C" G`` °` a w P C u>• N O y L t+ VVp r rr t C•> OCq ptiG Yrt�V.�irCr z —4 !V —_• —O< p r ..• < < e h O M— n< T N^ r' C P^ PVC LVt CP CV VP P 4P4 W L= P44 CL 105 -« G O __ Il ^M�� rN4 p CO C rAE 4 Vn V ^J X r C< N q C r >ff .C. a <�• - P` C d C u y 1 _ G C y - A C 6 N T £ e = L D O Y- C TIJ G dyv +y l> V A y L V C6 L<VN C PV 0 L i A C r O u C= gp 4 ppC p� D 9 J L 4 C d ✓L- yErO IOW i m� OJ ME G0. A� 1VVC d0 V C ! J E o✓ Y.5 6 C ✓ C « 3 ° A N PG n J L Y V C A 6 r_ C N PTN 6 ,y Cr C U �s i v Ay GV nOiV� VG Y V CC O V• P O Y{- CL Y O✓ a V or" n �4 a- G c -,,..0 r. - a JC ..� °NpN �'C =J A� ✓ O.b Wit] N V nr A�� CCCra ^ -C CL pp �J �PVa� Y VTJ °O WC 4 p�r � L N M V L nf.JC V O ✓`` - NN V e` V d �O .E UC PC C t ✓ O t� ppO 6 C✓ - „ -79 Pn NLe c -<�✓ V i �y ? SSO r 1 °yr. + C V W -a 4 4 V P P L Pr OM uC N✓ ^- G pC y W N i � P I Y C C = C P!- - � P✓ r N N O. C� C s ArJ C Z'=, O O C C V G «rJJJ J 6G LY 6� p N I pLa WVW �n i.lJ 6Zt✓ <�/�u <UV0 N f C� � G \ • `N r1 f e r ✓C <rC .O _2t Z `VJ VOA -J S. V jV O- J 1 A i Y y.. V r C 4 2 r._. O Z ✓ C r. C 9 V V YY O .. G✓ Cp YP _ C cp�p r �N.m5 f1- r > ✓ __ N6 fr .Gi. a.0 �2p O �� _O >.� a o ✓EC I -VC a _GVV 4 SS V ✓ l 4G a O r 'J � 6O S °I > « OO � � -�L Na WrOL O AiCp]L AOAOC `VC V C I �Y C_ +.AAA ✓�+ -_ ✓C� d rCU wCo N C 0 0 1L «« • r 4 >. = V V PN O O ryC L V C L C Oi 0 AA V= YJ�r V C O.p Jir �. ✓ <m iJ0 elOZr r1 yA PEES >� O V 6 I j C L C I gI C V P 1 W W YI < 1 n 4✓ � � 0.r I _ 2VOjI1 _ �{ phi u u C N O L C • .O+ drV L O r L w N V V y q C_ r r 1 C G O VL r C 0W i • a L— O w� p p P Y u J L p 1• OW Y OW ' mm r- = q Y C N .. d• C w V = I CC Ne a r c�� � • p V •^ O N_ I i Td N - @oL� Y L p U C L L� • -« � e a � �' V P F �= O 6 9 m Y 7• q "� ` I •� «o • C �Y •o uaNO 04'r 1 I C +ad Ir NY CCrLY eC0 1 ` C` %\ L P V �MO Mp0 ^p r�r NP� Op ^ C L t N v �� .� C C O V O �� J•� ` P 6 C y Y = r q I c v (..iZ i , r Y ry• NLj PL0 I \� = N Y w�L p / 1 r e`N, r jp O a Cp ` JW .qu VFO C 1 � YI 1 yC V O` L m L per_ O^ Y N' °�✓ V V W fV d 9 C 2° a. ci � �O�j O^ 096 �GL YU C CLV �I 0 6 @ N 17 I i Q q C Nar NI I I N �II O J^ C 2 C" ^rL u €p8 4 Y V • C• =00 4 qv I Iw v W ,m v V m i r i N V LA L s u p i r L L C O O yL� `L N L r V L V �- v> V y C v p i O4 V � > C = •c Si pw y- cs — • VC f ^I 1e) .fLC C p rCr 'e d r Ore �N Orr drV L O r CCCPON a t C Op r y N V V q d q C_ r r r C r r L V p w� p p P Y u J L p C C e v r y L l' c Y L Y 6 ' mm r- q Y C N .. d• V = I CC Ne a r c�� � • p V •^ O N_ I i Td N - @oL� ��r C ` GP� V�V L ii >Cd� ^O• e �' V P F �= O 6 9 m Y 7• q > ae M C •� C • C I\ 1 CCrLY eC0 1 ` C` %\ L P V �MO Mp0 ^p r�r NP� Op ^ C L t N v �� .� C C O V O �� J•� ` P 6 Y = r (..iZ i , r Y ry• NLj PL0 I \� = N Y w�L p / 1 r e`N, r jp O a Cp ` JW .qu VFO C 1 � YI 1 yC V O` L m L per_ O^ Y N' °�✓ V V W cooCCV�� �_� ci � �O�j O^ 096 �GL VC° qC C CLV �I 0 6 @ N 17 I i Q q C Nar NI I I N �II J^ C 2 C" ^rL e €p8 4 Y V • C• =00 4 qv I Iw v W ,m v V m i r i N V LA L s u p i r L L C O O yL� `L N L r V L V �- v> V y C v p i O4 V � > C = •c Si pw y- cs — • VC f ^I 1e) .fLC C p rCr 'e d r Ore �N Orr drV L O r CCCPON a t C Op r y N V V q d q C_ r r r C r r L V p w� p p P Y u J L p C C e v r y L l' c Y L Y 6 ' mm r- q Y C N Ne a r c�� � • Td N - @oL� ��r C ` GP� V�V L ii >Cd� ^O• e �' V P F �= O 6 9 m Y 7• q > — d P V �MO Mp0 ^p r�r NP� Op ^ C L t N v �� .� C C O V O �� J•� ` P 6 Y = r �C �. qOa w�L p r e`N, r jp O a Cp ` � =� .qu VFO C C C yC V O` L m L per_ O^ Y N' °�✓ V V � �O�j O^ 096 �GL VC° qC C CLV > 0 6 @ 9 C Q q C Nar pN r J^ C C" ^rL LCT_> CCONOC ' p wq M —rwa N q7' r i l 3 0 C` O w V P w P •• P N OV N •y � E s= Y g> N.°+� fYj p >• V > �-- r �M WYw r � O � Y � S I L Y � rC • a. . t V NOON pp (i • C C O G— f ^ i > W o L L < O V V O P• O �} _ O • V �I .I C C- a 1 J €p8 4 Y V • C• =00 4 qv I Iw v W ,m v V m i r i N V LA L s u p i r L L C O O yL� `L N L r V L V �- v> V y C v p i O4 V � > C = •c Si pw y- cs — • VC f ^I 1e) 0—Or C 0 •rte, 7 a ` V ¢ = V 4 O r V y P Q = �• r V 4 L L— J q S � N Z r y XR r V( • , 5L NYp`` .r 98 YN CEO O V I P V r C N N- V D✓ r C °¢ V �° a NT P �f 8> n C� Cy I —CpL 9 p •O•• � Ol '2 ,Li.— a0 s 4.0.1 �v S ` OWN 4L. aL 10 1Vt w PG n — y r V 9 a C I y_ L O =1J — P pI pd r OPT Cr � OJ 4 y a uV. I LL,• C O p . u L L � p N `_ 0^ Y r r I C Y p a 1 Y■ O i .Y. r r I d 4 d V T V p!_ 0 ei �9 - Lam <O.N C.Ow JS � I N S— �.L•. � i <� 6w'J !� Y �I ... rs • � 40 m P O � \�. 4V 4G4 N4 NTa4 L I Ga4 == M� - 4 • L`444 � Y p I� 7O 4 NNOi 6 i4 ¢ VV Oe � P 0` o p L p.°,.Si. P hr t. Npr P r r= LPO `a �cc L �o ��.L. ry `c —_ • pia °> �_a. y dP N< o r �4 O r� a •T VPO 4r afO Lu �� Cr — N- rp N I� r IO.b tn.•C SLN1d G r VdG� O L� r(1 .G —wr_ OQ =yr9_ 7 C PI.GI ¢_+ =n Wr` n= G VL Vq�lr C4i �p 1.L_ pV U _ • a= S W< @E p` p a 7 4 P N y G H ^p9 CVLY L UGC i L P�L 04 LV L L 1 r 9 T yq 4 y _ 6 V p {ry L T �. p W N r V V l p C fc °_WV� QE` 4. p_4E�� _ °� �eO yL Ed Ca�j Lr� �VL¢.e N C42E� ipN b0 PL `r�i ° O yCO g�6 XrV 10 cc -Z 6— 1°i On r• ay = ¢_ . � — V r �� Y` i O N N T 4 r a` J J T �r wC 6 •r_ YP V• � i V _ V4 — V �_ N — r. MOs— <5� BO O =z 6a� < 1C ...w� V'^ .6 O 6 Vp O N • In Ll to 11 JJ V d 0 i 4 11 E e• P a. C C r S L o• > d c o � r G � •O � iOi C O O L O s o d V rq V � G p _ C •- �r r � MJ v iS r9 V. q V J Yr ~ q N Ep r q w s O o - V V V Y00 'J3 OJ YEN n t N L V d•] O °c q n !E .r ss L so r Y 9 O V Ye' � r Y y OLyF C i 4 r - C j V q > L q > ` V L Y•V•� prG L 9 N V iC O q E 7� q >I O — O � O G� r YI V ✓ L V GI O v —Y O V/ 61 oVI ut V G N 7 � y u a 9 y a w 9 ML L Q p ` N q r > p p o r• e v •Ynp v oc oc V P q O C V L c - 7 � r C C p� PO L � — u o V r 4 p V V r < 6 I c >— I �� e 1 V N V r E j O i O 1 r G i c 1 r L q W r i II I o ,•• L I r 1 C C L I I u O S � Y •� C O c u O I i V q I I o Y a e 0o cs e � n E r.1 LJ 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1984 T0: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Pick Gomez, City Planner BY: Dan Coleman, Associate Planner a• SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PARCEL MAY ou i - TRAILS - Ar, appeal bridle trail ocations within a subdivision of 3 lots located on the north side of Manzanita Drive, east of Vineyard Avenue. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission approved Parcel Map 6051 on May T3, 1981 as shown in Exb+ibit "A ". The attached minutes and conditions of approval indicate that trail easements were required. However, the Final Nap was recorded without trail easements on April 13, 1982. Surrounding residents brought this to the City's attention, at which poi;it the developer, Fred Nelson, was notified of the trail requirement per the conditions of approval. The Equestrian Advisory Committee subsequently reviewed the Map and determined trail locations. This decision was appealed by the surrounding residents who preferred a different trail alignment. A brief history of Parcel Map 6051 and copies of all correspondence to date are attached for your information. Ii. ANALY SIS: The Equestrian Advisory Committee (EAC) decision was based upon two factors: (1) General Plan trail policies, and (2) lack of trails on surrounding properties. The following General Plan policies are pertinent: o Whenever possible and feasible, the Citv shall require that ail residential lots in the equestrian rural area have local Feeder Trails on the rear of the lot. o Require that all development within (Equestrian Rural) area relate to ex--ting ".nd future areas occupied by equine, bovine, cleft- hoofed animals and poultry by providing trail connections through easements in ;rder to connect disconnected trails and for needed access to recre, �iop activities. None c` the adjacent properties have trails, as shown in Exhitit "B", including the tract to the east where horses are not permitted. Tracts t3 the south and west have a complete local feeder trail system. The adjacent property owners could declare reciprocal trail easements through a cooperative effort. ITEM P pu1NNING COMMISSION January 11, 1984 Appeal of Parcel Map Page 2 AGENDA 6051 �J T EAC reconriended that trail easements be provided between Parcels 1, 2 and 3 along common property lines as shown on Exhibit "A ". This satisfies the intent of the General Plan to provide trail access to the rear of each property. The appellants would propose trail easements that run around the entire perimeter of the Parcel Map to provide trail access to all of the adjacent properties. However, such easements would be for use by only those parcels within Parcel. Map 6051 and not adjacent. parcels. The EA.0 rejected this trail alignment because it would place a hardship upon the developer to provide trail improvements for other properties. Further, the General Plan policy did not provide a basis for requiring a perimeter 'trail because there are no trails to connect with. Another issue raised by the appellants is the question of public vs. private trail easements. To date, local feeder trail easements within Rancho Cucamonga have been recorded for the benefit of only the property owners within the tract where the easement is located; maintenance, liability and ownership rest with the private property owner. In actuality, these private easements are commonly used by the general public except where blocked. This is consistent with the General Plan trail Policies that designate public trails along the public right of way (i.e., Community and Regional Trails). Regardless of public or private, the developer or property owner could install a fence along their property line for privacy and security, which would block trail access from surrounding properties. III. OPTIONS: Based upon the information contained herein there arc essentially three options available to the Commission: A. Uphold the Equestrian Advisory Committee's decision. Pros - Provides trail access to all 3 lst:. within Parcel ;'o 6051, and two surrounding properties. Cons - Does not provide crail access to all surrounding properties C. Require trail easements around entire perimeter per appellants request. Pros - Provides trail access to all lots within Parcel Map 6051 and all surrounding properties. Cons - Trail access to surrounding properties could be block._ by perimeter fence. No surrounding trails to connect with. 0 LJ C1 E PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA January 11, 1984 Appeal of Parcel Map 6051 Page 3 C. Request developer and surrounding propzrty owners to work trgether to provide mutually beneficial trail access. Pros - Could potentially provide trail access to all properties. Cons - Could delay issuance of building permits (which are "on hold' paneling resnliiiinn of this appeal). IV. RECOMMENDA1ON: It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider a materials and input concerning this appeal. Staff recommends that tiie Planning Commission consider all options and provide the developer with appropriate direction. submitted, Planner /kep Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Parcel Map Exhibit "B" Area Map Exhibit "C" - Master Plan of Trails Exhibit "D" - Trail Design Standard History of Parcel Map 6051 Appeal letter Excerpt from Conditions of Approval Minutes of May 13, 1981 Planning Commission Agenda Correspondence ,.' _•. 1 �. �^ .. TZA /L.Z E.- HILLSIDE CITY Off' RAIS - acsoaeo�sasoa ®sv�asossveoaaa�o S �r. EXISTING (rONM1 -a REGKXM MJLT - SYSTEM ui 1•rs.� /a�Z s AC wi J IL ri uj iLVANKINCA • a NORTH >ENI: EXHIBIT :� City Of rancho Cucamonga L 151 Z #ar 1r srLrr rrA4 L FEJiCt: STV- vr-4A4. loll STANDARD DRAWING 15411 2 =1 Mac. `t ��..�.. ^..•� "IS-� Gul' 3LOPL �Ie�pSK SLA °'Q:•CE ��T`rt� pi CAL Gar- LTf01`{ STV 10' IY.Q i- T'4VL esrwD f�T Lft6 4NLt.D f'JR UF7-Cxzr VD, 0 \ 3 tr-T refs- urT Gcw-m `r- LILT POOL ACf-a55 'TM.�iL :r �� p�-plN X161 MAY M`E " F-rABLE A-r Tt =T L'�Za'yLl� -�ic� r�J�%EHT TD :w��DEYE6_.Oi %�D f2�IDchiT�`L- fj oTa 0. i�a7R CVrA01K4 i VKA4W<f s 6t;" c-1<. /'ND OTt+SR' 5t'l`.GIFICATtOE�S� SCE 1-He nfHer- 546o of T"1S 5iievr. LOCAL FEEDER TRAM 11001 Oft'.' 0413"M r o.t. ZS480 BRIEF HIFTMY OF PARCEL MAP 605: DATE ACTION Pre - Incorporation County approved multiple land subdivisons of neighborhood without requiring trail easements. A i 98n Darrol Map 6051 submitted to City Engineering VCS. G��✓G. 9 v Department. December 5, 1980 Planning Department comments to Engineering Department that traits are required. May 1, 1981 Public bearing Notices mailed to surrounding property owner. May 139 1981 Plannine Co=ission approves Parcel Map 6051. ,tune 6, 1981 Final Parcel Map 605_ without trails submitted to Engineering. August 28, 1981 Engineering plan checker recommends approval of Final Map. December 16, 1981 City Councii approves Final Map 6051 without trails. April 13, 1982 Parcel Map 6051 recorded without trails. September 7, 1983 City Council approves Improvement Agreement. ;lovember 18, 1983 City notified by adjacent resident that Final Map was recorded without trails. Developer notified that trail easements must be recorded. NovEnber 28, 1983 Residents file petition to require trails. Planning Department sends letter to petitioners explaining -.ity trail requirements. Equestrian Advisory Committee sent Parcel Map 6051 for review of trail requirements. December 7, 1983 Equestrian Advisory Committee makes recommendation on trail locations. December 8, 1383 Developer notified of Equestrian Advisory Committee recommendation. December 9, 1983 Appeal filed by residents. December 89 1983 ft.. Jack Lam, City Planner City or Rancho Cucamonga SIN T , ,.i Y l` I. 3ryFA _ - FA 9320 Baseline goad ! $asaho Cucamonga,. California 91730 Res AXPUL - gecialon of Planning Department for bridle trails on Parcel 5 051 Dear Sir e This letter is an =Deal of the decision of the Rancho C,icamanga Planning Department on November 28. 1y83 wherebf, the Nelson Construction Company was permitted to provide easements betlsen parcels rather than arosnd Vie Perimeter. Can that sere date, "joini.ng concerned residents fileu a Petlttloa with the Planning Dspartment ttat139 rsasons }hut plar. was totally ineffective and how it served as a detriment to abutting property. The Planning Department ne'7crtheleae hose to permit fir. Relaenle plan to be aporoved and accoi°d±yiy to -ft• Arn Coleman, to she surro�znding property ov 6,*''s 1,ere under a °miscOAcepticn° regarding the purpose of bridle .rails. as accused concerned residents of wanting bridle trails at the expense of another. It should be pointed aut that the adjoining property was sub - divided long before th4 tract horses to the wesu and south were developed. At wa virtua3ly au;- rorusded by oper. fields, orchards and vinaysrds. These who built homes at chn..t tli^e were not given an option of promrlding easerent: or even made aware that this was &- da- vlaRion from the general plan. They. were told what to do in order to be allowed building permits.. These residents rre not the subdividers who can be credited with the omission. Jcr should they now be held accountatle for decisions of the governing authority at that time. To affirm that position would be to holl that residents of Rancho Cucamonga shall be forever penalized for a situation over which they had no control. SCM it is the position of the Planning Department that they are not responsible Sot 'What was done when this area was uninecrporated. Bro though there is a °master plan* r71ch is supposed to provide certain assurances for future land use, it sanears the Planning Department was ukable to foresee the detriment to surrounding property. With the rapid development of Rancho :ueamonge, the Planning Department has a duty to insure tt:•:t further developaent maintains the purpose for which the land was ir►tenied and to see that it is not harmful to surrounding property and them cosmunity. 7R E .2. Apparently the Planning Department is unable to see beyond the Nelson property. Had they looked further, they would see that this plan virtually makes three abutting lots useless as horse property duo to lack of access, One lot does not even have the possibility of a future bridle trail because of street requirements, unusual lot size abutting and topographical impossibility, There is not ,lust a need to access with a horse, but there is a need to keep horse trailers off the street, accept deliveries, farriers, veterinarians: carcass removal and Ymcst lmoortantiy, for exit in case of fire._ The factors would be critical If any of the current owners wished to sell their property to prospective horse or live- stock owners. This would decrease the mar -wet value o-r hoass because the limited use of the land would decrease the number of potential buyers. The effect is permanent and irreversible. The Planning Departn ent is obviously more concerned with the profit motives of contractors than the concerns of residents who have chosen this area to live because of certain guarantees of elected officials and confidence that those goals would be carried out. Rancho Cucamonga living should assure a quality of life, not a vulnerability to every builder who wants to decrease his costs at the expense of the neighborhood. None of the adjoining property owners have ever been notified of the proposed plans of Nelson Constriction. He was before the Planning Co"mission on May 13, 1981 when he attempted illegal lot sizes. This is not the .first time Mr. 'nelson has attempted to circumvent regulations. That plan was thwarted only because one resident learned of the proposal through fortuitous circumstances, not by notice. Only the diligence of property owners has caused an awarenesa at this late date. Mr. Nelson has already been allowed "minor deviations' on lot size, lot width and street width. It is these minor deviations, when carried to the point of abuse, that di -finish property values, future use of property and peaceful enjoyment,. The Planning Department has not answered letters of inquiry and the only Kay concerned citizens have been able to keep abreast of develop^nents is by constant telephoning and making personal visits to the Planning Department office. The only correspondence received appears deliberately vague. A letter received from Mr. Coleman on November 28, 1983 states that "The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan requires that all residential lots in th.o equestrian /viral area (north of Banyon) provide trail access to the rear of the lot." This is not in reality what is being done. Access is being provided to the side. Mr. Coleman was not able to provide a code or regulation to verify the legitinae7 of fir, Nelson, only that it was policy, ME The Nelson plan. for `�ridle trails floes nothing more than provide a driveway to the lots on his subdivision. If bridle trails are "private",. then what is to stop each and every homeowner with a " _-rid=e path along his property from t^loo'cing access? The paths are used by the community, children going to and from school as well as persons on horseback. is It the City's contention to force equestrians and pedestrians Into the street? one of Mr. Nelson's ar;piments is that an easement surrounding his property would result 1r. -AA iti� I ara.sa due to the fencing requirements. HcNewer, since he plans to live in the largest lot, this is a cost he would have to bear regardless. As for the snaller parcels concerned, there Is no doubt twist he would pass that cost on to prospective buyers. The Planning Department and the City have a responsibility to the community as a whole. There Is no detriment to the Nelson Construction Company but a tremendous detriment to the neighborhood. The Planning Department cannot be allowed to rely on the excuse that the problem was created- by the Cointy, especially when they have ample opportunity to deal with the situation r+efor& the problem is created. Heritage Park was created for equestrians brat at present there is no wap to reach the Park without using heavily travelled streets or tresDasslnG on private property. Sven the trespassing option will he lost when surrounding land is developed. in shot, the area is zoned f or the use and keeping of horses but it Is safe only if you never leave your back yard. There Is much more at stake than the additional fencing requirement for bridle trails. If It is the intent of the City to rid Itself of horses* then it shvild state that in clear. 'inambiTious terns rather than leading ho=eow-ners to '^elleve this is a desireable community for equestrians. Mr. Nelson's plan is not wlth_•n the spirit of the community and creates only fictitious easer..ents. This only serves to set a precedent for other builders. If other builders co +ild demand equal privileges, the riding . hicinz and dogging trails of Rancho Cucamonga would become a myth. Bridle trails surrounding the perimeter have been required of other contractors and there seems to be no valld reason why this development should be an exception to that long practiced standard:. Subdivision was lntiiated for the Droperty s'irronnding Parcel 6o51 in 1973. The first home was constr•ic*_ed in 1976. At that time it xws the sole Inhabited parcel. Shortly theraftery houses were constricted on adjoining logs as well as the Sievers tract to the west. Mr. Sievers was not allowed to precant the a'gemenc that Mr. Nelson is now pre- senting and was required to provide easements around the peri- meter of his development. To say that property owners now have a duty to orovido trails would result in needless waste and economic lose which is greatly disproportionate to what �r would be gained. It would mean the removal of existing strictures, barns, corrals, fencing, plantings. underground watering systems and other improvements set in concrete. The expense to these homeowners would be great while asking Mr. Nelsor. to comply would require minimal effort and expense. To put the burden on surrounding property owners this late date is unreasonable and unfair. While it is true that bridle trails are not now required of the adjoLning property owners, it has boen suggested that providing such trails at this time would present a valid argument against the Nelson plan. The gist of Mr. Nelson's argument is "they did:-not provide bridle trails, so why Should ! ?* if every developer took that position, the master plan would be meaningless and property owners would never know wh_ch, if any contractors* xo;ild be required to comply. It is hard to believe that the five parcels a`+uttirg the Nelson property can now serve as an excuse for developers to avoid their responsibilities. It is thertfore respectfully recommended that$ 1. The Nelson Construction Company be required to provide bridle trails on the entire peri- meter of his subdivision or the west, north and east aides. 2. The City issue a declaration that such bridle trails are for the use of the public and access cannot be denied. 3. That aburtting property owners be personally notified of any neeting, hearing or decisions related to the issues of this appeal. Concerned Citizens e 4�� -4A,t.) i3vcv Lc1<,4"J aeorxZ ea., �} Li-R- Lrtrn g i ?WGk�,4t% 2 11 Ell TENTATIVE MAP X10. 6051 Page 4 Alsk celIaneous 35. Dust abatement will be made a condition of issuance of the grading permit for this project. 36. poise impact on this project will be mitigated in accordance with the Planning Division report on subject property. 37. This property is not withir the present City Boundary and will re,,uire annexation. 38. All information required to be shown on the tentative map is not shown as re- qui red: _ 39. Proper grading and erosion control, including the rreventation of sedimenta- tion or damage to offsite property shall be provided for as required. 40. A preliminary soils report will not be required for this site for the follow- -` ing reasons: A copy of the soils report furnished to the Building Division prior to grading will be furnished to the Engineering Division. 41. The filing of the tentative map or approval of same does not guarantee that sewer treatment capacity will be available at the time building permits art requested. When building permits are requested, the Cucamonga County Water District will be asked to certify the availability of capacity. Permits will not be issued unless said certification is received in writing. 42. The City Engineer shall make the determination, in accordance with Section 66436(C)(1) of the Subdivision Map Act, that division and development of the property will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any public entity or public utility right -of -way or easement and the signa- ture of any such public entity or public utility may be omitted from the final map unless the City is notified in writing of any objection to said determina- tion within the specified time limits of said Section. 43. At the time of Final Clap submittal, the following shall be submitted: Traverse calculations (sheets), copies of recorded maps and deeds used as reference and/ or showing original land division, tie notes and bench marks referenced. 44. Development shall be limited to one drive approach per street. Multiple lots fronting on a single street shall use coreaon drive approaches at lot lines. X 45 This map shall be reviewed by the Equestrian Committee to determine what local equestrian traisl are required, if any, prior to recordation map. X 46. The parcel map shall be approved as a 3 lot subdivision with a public street -- as shown in Exhibit "A ". A minor deviation sh;,li be issued by the City Planner for lot widths in lots fronting on Manzanita. It CITY OF P.ANCHO CUCAMONGA LLOYD B. HUBBS CITY ENGINEER $y' C41�10AJ.ac�. 'Ra Zo/�rli�l/°S 11 11 0 Dahl then asked for the motion approving the Planned Motion. *:o• No. 81 -55 zoning from AYES: by Rempel, seconded by Tolstoy, carried to wing Planned Development No. 80 -01 reque R -3 /PD. NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: C0'4%Tl SZC` Rempel, Tols tqq�'- King, Dahl 1W.= a4b p.m. Planning Commission recessed. :45 p.m. Planning Commission reconvened. pOE'P.esclution a change in J. EN�'IRONM�NTAL ASSESSMENT AND PARCEL M N0. 6052 - NELSON - a residential subdivision of 1.9 acres of land into four parcels within the R- 1- 20,000 zone located on the north side of Manzarita Avenue between Carnelian and Beryl Street. `?r. Barry K. Hogan, City Planner, reviewed the Staff Report indicating that this item had been published as a four lot subdivision consisting of 20,000 square foot lots. Mr. Hogan stated that since that publication it had been brought to Staff's attention that this figure also included the private road. Mr. slogan further stated that he needed clarification on the Commission policy that stated the 20,000 square foot figure must exclude roads, therefore making it possible to only split this parcel into three lots rather than four. Chairman Dahl stated chat it had been a past policy of the Commission in a similar situation where the Commission stated that R- 1- 20,000 meant exclusive of any private streets and this decision was upheld by the City Council. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that he thought that this should be a policy of the Commission to state that 20,000 square foot lots was a requirement in this zone exclusive of any road surface. Chairman the nece that alo ts, such i Commissioner Rempel stated that it had been Commission's past policy to discourage private streets with the exception of planned developments and tie felt that they should remain in those areas, all others being public streets. is Planning Co =ission Minutes - 5- May 13, 1981 There was further discussion relative to public vs. private streets. j I ,Mr. Hogan stated that. it would be- possible to make the street width 32" and he wou' , by Cowauissio= direi.tion, issue d Minor Deviation for one foot on the street width. Mr. Rougeau stated ghat the street. may have to be slightly wider that proposed as that would be a curb -to -curb width and it might be necessary to have additional right -of -way area. Mr. Hogan replied that he had the authority to issue a 10% variance on lot width creating some flexibility in the width of the street. Chairman Dahl asked if the applicant would agree to these conditions. Mr. Skip Nelson, applicant and resident of Rancho Cucamonga, replied that he would be agreeable to these conditions. Mr. Hogan stated that Staff would work with Engineering in adjusting the street and lot width through a Minor Deviation. Mr. Hogan stated that it was his interpretation that Commission policy would be to determine that the 20,000 square foot lot designation was exclusive of any pavement or road surface area, and that private streets are not allowed except in planned developments or in special cases where the Commission may deem appropriate. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the condition would have to be a pre- existing condition and not one manufactured at the time of the lot split. There being no further discussion, Chairman Dahl 3pened the public hearing. Mr. Job n Beck, Rancho Cucamonga resident, asked if lots 1 and 3 would be fronting Manzanita. Mr. Hogan replied that they would. :4r. Beck stated that this was a very satisfactory project. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, to approve the parcel map as corrected. Commissioner Rempel asked Commissioner Tolstoy if he would amend the motion to state as finaling determined using the alternate criteria and including the Minor Deviation. Commissioner Tolstoy modified his motion. Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Rempel, carried to adopt Resolution No. 61-56 approving Parcel Map No. 6051 as a three lot subdivision with a public street as shown in Exhibit 'A' and aand a ml or Deviation shall be issued by the City Planar for lot widths on the lots fronting Manzanita, and the deletion of conditions 45 and 46. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Tolstoy, Rempel, Icing, Dahl NOES: CO1asSIONERS: None ARSF_NT- COWTSSTONER.S: Sceranka A(AW A November lc, 1903 City Of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 9320 Baseline Road Rancho Cucamonga, California Attention: Dan Coleman Dear Mr. Coleman, This letter is to confirm a telephone conversation of November 17. 1983, regarding 3ridle Trails being required as part of the development of a parcel of land located at the 8900 block of Manzanita. This parcel is being subdivided by The Nelson ® Construction Company. My property borders this two acre parcel to the Northwest, and :, as well as the other property owners bordering this develop - ment are deeply concerned about the fact that the plan submitted by The Nelson Construction Company does not provide for the re- cu -red easements, which would, therefore, block access to the rear of our lots. Conversations with Mr. Nelson, the contractors, show that he is aware of the fact that such bridle trail - easements are required, but he has stated that he has no intent_cn of complying with these recuirements, and joked about the fact that the Planning Department "screwed -up" when they approved his plan to subdivide. Although Mr. Nelson indicated full knowledge of his responsibili- ties to provide easements, he stated that he :iad Planning Depart- ment approval and it was too late to do anything about it. _n talking with you, Mr. Coleman, you indicated that Mr. Nelson should have been required to rrovide bridle trail- easements as part of his Master plan. You further indicated that although the subdivision plans had been approved, it was error to do so, and that no building permits would be issued to The Nelson Construction Company for building on that parcel until the bridle trails are provided. El I] I would appreciate written confirmation of our conversation to clarify the situation for all concerned. Certainly The Nelson Construction Company should be notified as socn as possible to prevent unnecessary hardohip to that company, and to allow their building plans to incorporate the necessary easements. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter in returning my phone cell, and I await your reply to this letter. S!_ncerejy yours „ ,+� / /I6 Michael A. Nicolai A E] I] sa chatuf & Norms U s.® c- pno.e ac,ama Y. ftm rya UAWMMW No.:ember 18, 1963 Mr. Fred ire i son 6610 Ramona Alta Lana, California 91701 SUBJECT: PARrEL MAP 6051 Dear Mgr. Nelson, -- It is our understanding that development of Parcel Kap_60S1 has started. - A.s you are aware, tine attached conditions of approval required provis -ion of equestrian easements.. It has come to our attention that said easements were inadvertently left off the final W. However, the recordation of the final map does not abrograte your responsibility.to provide said easements per City standard. - _ Therefore, prior to issuance of building.pennits -a Declaration of- _ - Easement must be recom�ed that establishes equestrian easements per the - - attached plan. Further, the trails must be constructed G6Rcurrently - - -- _ with each hone. Enclosed for yocr convenience are the City's trail stancards. This include., small driveways where trails intersect with - Manzanita. City staf�ify the street improvement plans accordingly. The P1 Siod shquld be contScted to inspect the trails prior to release of occupancy. -- Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. Should you have any further gue-stians or comments, please do ndt hesitate to call. Sincerely, COM"ITY DEVEL EPARL9 -XT - - _ - -- PLANNING DIVISIO) Dan GO~ - - - - Associate Alaaner - -- _ - Oulu* - - - Attacltats - _ - CC: JdiL arty, j"ry Gnat 0 11 11 City of Hamaho Cucamonga Plemning Departrant 9320 Hkaseline H.-sed nano." Cucamonga, Calif oral& Dear 82rsI November 28, 1983 propersy GTi'n6Yt, of i Vs o J4.4=41r.- . SAC !arcicp���! M the 8900 block of Kaansanita (shown on- Parcel Plap 604-0 ) are concerned that proper bridle trails will not be pravided..to the detriment of our neighborhood.. This subdivision, being developed by the Nelson Construction Company, seems to again lack the proper re- quirement of a parcel meant to be m part of the community. The nelson Construction Company appears to be avoiding its responsibility to our community and to be pushing in the direction of maximum housing density. on may 13. 1981. the City Planning Commission isnie4 a subdivision plan to the Company due to its clearly violating lot size requirements. Portunately, despite a lack of notice to adjacent property owners, that plan was resected. However. the Nelson Construction was, qt that times placed on notice that approval of a subdivision lnelnded a policy not only of 20.000 square foot lots, but also the "inclusion of the necessary easements, such as trails and utility easements in the 20.000 square foot area.' (Plec.se note Planning Commission minutes of May 13, 1981), When the Nelson Construction Company was notified of the easement requirements for the trails by concerned neighbors, it denied the need for thew, stating it was too late now that the subdivision had been approved. This being brought to the attention of the Planning Department, in the person of Mr. Dan Coleman, he admitted that the Department had erred and would require bridle trail easements around the perimeter of the entire parcel. stow, we understand that the Planning Department is considering allowing Mr. Nelson yet another variance. if allowed, it would permit the Company to provide fifteen foot easements along property lines dividing the three proposed parcels only, In other words. riding trails would extend only from the cul -de -sac to the boundaries of the Darcel. This in effect would be no easemart. This is an attempt by the Company to skirt minimum legal requirements and violate the spirit of our community, Ll 11 0 The Nelson plan would deny property an three sides the use of an easement to ride, walk and enjoy access from the property except onto streets which have Increasing traffic and are increasingly unsafe for all persons, especially children oa horseback. The City of 3snchc Cucamonga in its Charter and through the spoken promises of its elected officials, has made a committment to trails and parks as part of the quality of life Jr. this area. This is an area to which people come to avoid the congestion and Lack of property planning se pre- valent In other areas. we, as residents of Rancho Cucsmonga, still believe in the City's cmmittnent to Gaza ?.Ity and to a life 3t7.e consistent with that expressed above. We also believe thst the City has an obligRtion to Insure that the profit *motive of variouo contractors be held in check and and that aporovai of plans made ror those organizations is consistent with the law and spirit of the community, Parcel Tap numr+er 6051 has 'heen given Many variances to date that appear inconsistent with the general, overall rian ror this area. •+e do not want further deviations from the _general plan and urge that the Planning Department insure that meaningful trails exist as part of this develop- ment and that t+iey extend arvind the entire perimeter of thls parcel before any building permits issue. Name Address C 'f4 2e.LottLY��SLJ .f'1 T o / ?.S,, ^� sA •s r, ,B-ita /,, , yfoo 8'1#04 Ma...sa -,�s CL �ys� C✓�pda►� 4: � ;7or . a 1977 (November 28, 1983 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA arw..Jon D. Mikels attached letter was sent to the following: Cawweaa�wW-.., Char les J. Baguet Il James C. Fevai 'loin Book Riebard M. Dahl n. Sehloaaer 5890 Buckthorn Alta L:aa. California 91701 Mr. b Mrs. Epperson 8959 Wilson Ranchc Cucamonga, California 91701 SUBJECT: PASCEL MAP 6051 - TRAILS Dear Resident: Sandra Buhr 8900 Y11 son Alta Loma. California 91701 Mr, S Mrs. Meyer 89. 4 Manzarita Alta Loan. California 91701 Michael Ni Gholai Alta loan. California 91701 Mr. 5 Mrs. Epperson 8959 Yilsm kancho Cucammga. California 91/01 Dank you for your letter of November 28 regarding Parcel Map 6051 located on Manzanita. The City of Rancho Cucamonga shares yt:x concern that equestrian trails be provided within this map area. In acccsdance with the col,,: :tions of approval the Equestrian Advisory Committee is reviewing the map to determine the proper locati,n of these trails. As you are aware from the Planning Commission Minutes, the Planning Commission approved Parcel Map 6051 as a three lot subdivision consistent with the policy requiring minimum 20,000 sq.ft. lots. Unfortunately, the City Engineering Division inadvertently allowed the Parrel Map to be recorded without trail easements. The City is now working 7th the developer, Nelson Construction, to resolve this matter. The City of Rancho Cucamono; General Plan requires that all residential lots in the equestrian /rural area (north of Banyan) provide trail access to the rear of the lot. These trails are intended to be used as bridle trails and for occasional service vehicles (c.g. - veterinarians). They are private easements granted for the use and enjoyment of property owners within the tract. in this case, the trail easements would be granted to all property owners within Parcel Mai. 60='. Thank You for your concern and interest in maintaining the quality of lifestyle in Rancho Cucamonga. Should you have any further questions or cowents, ;.'.base 03 not hesitate to call. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELOP�EK DEPARTMENT Pl f>r�IVISIOK 1 n Colvith Ass-OcTafte Planner DC /das tic BA&ELPM ZOAD. sUfft C • PWT OFFICE BOX Mn • RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALiFOR NIA 911W • (710 "11.1851 0 0 CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM DATE: December 8, 1983 TO: Barbara Krall, Engineering Technician FROM: Equestrian Advisory Committee SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP 6051 - EQUESTRIAN TRAILS The Equestrian Advisory Committee reviewed Parcel Map 6051 at their meeting of December 7, 1983. The Committee unanimously recommends that trail easements be provided between the three parcels, as shown on the attached plan. The Committee based its decision upon the General Plan policies regarding trail access and the lack of trail easements on surrounding properties. The Committee encourages the developer to work with the surroLrr- ing property owners to arrange for future trail easements than ;:gay serve the immediate vicinity. Coimmi ttee Members Dick DaFl Dennis Stout Dan Coleran Present: Christine Benoit Pam Henry P.S. - Surrounding property owners have appealed the EAC decision, basicaily desiring public easements around the entire map perimeter. The appeal has been scheduled for the January 11, 1984 Planning Commission agenda. E 11 11 December 8, 1983 Clip' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ervwJon D. Mikcle c...rd....r.. Charles J. Bo4aet 11 James C. Frost Bic`.ard M. Dale! Philip D. Schloss— Mr. Fred Nelson 6810 Ramona Alta Loma, California 9170:1 SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP 6051 - EQUESTRIAN TRAILS De.:: Mr. Nelson: The Eauestrian Advisory Committee has on December 7, 1983, reviewed Parcel Map 6051 pursuant to the conditions of approval. Based upon a review of the map and the surrounding area the Committee has unanimously recommended that equestrian easements be provided between the three parcels, as shown on the attached plan. The Committee based its decision upon the General Plan policies regarding trail access and the lack of trail easements on surrounding properties. Enclosed for your convenience is a completed Declaration of Easement to establish said equestrian easements. Please have the document notarized, recorded, and return a copy to the City Engineering Division. Also enclosed, are copies of tfa City's trail oesign standards. The Engineering Division will modify the 6urlwood street improvement plans to include curb cuts for the trails. Since our telephone conversation, the surrounding property owners have appealed the Equestrian Advisory Committee decision. The attached pet'. ±ior-, c;ces their preference for a continuous easement around the entire perimeter of Parcel Map 6051. The appeal has been scheduled for January 11, 1984 Planning Commission agenda. Therefore, any action regarding declaring the easements should be postponed. UN BASELINE ROAD. SU M& C s PORT OFFICE BOX NT • RANCHO CUCA'4DNGA. CALIFORNIA 91TU • (714) 9WIS61 C_ Mr. Fred Nelson Suhj: Parcel Map 6051 December &, 1933 Page Two - Equestrian Trails Thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, COWJN-KY DEVELOP] PLANNING DIVISION i d *A, ✓10AN COLEMAN `- Associate Pianner DC /aas cc: Barbara Krall Jerry Grant enclosure E u r 1 LJ . A* • aim CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ar.,,. Jon D. Mikeis Ar.e+/..."Wrl Charles J. 3a"et 11 Janes C. Frost Rickard M. Dahl Phillip D. Schlosser The attacned lettrr was sent to the followirr: December, 13, 1983 indez,address 1. Sandra Suhr L Michael Nicalai 8900 Wilson Avenue Rancho Cucancnga, California 91701 2. John & Sharon Book 5830 B:ickthorn Mr. & Mrs. Epperson Poncho Cucamonga. California 91701 8959 Wilson 3 ^_. &Mrs. Ayer Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 8`14 Manran it Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 SUBJECT: PARCEL MAP 6651 - TRAILS W. e4nrs. Epperson 8959 Wilson Dear Resident: Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701 We are in receipt of your appeal concerning Parcel Map 6051 regarding trail improvements. Your appeal has been scheduled for the January 11, 1984 Planning Commission agenda. Anyone having concerns or questions regarding this matter is invited to attend this meeting where an opportunity will be provided for public comment. Copies of the staff report concerning the appeal will be hailed to you prior to the meeting. On December 7, 1983, the Equestrian Advisory Committee reviewed Parcel Map 6051 pursuant to the conditions of approval. Based upon the review of the map and the surrounding area, the Committee has unanimously recommended that equestrian easements be provided between the three parcels as shown on the attached plan. The Committee based its decision upon the General Plan policies regarding trail access and the lack of trail easements on surrounding properties. CGncerning your appeal, the .following clarificaticns must be noted: 1. It is an appeal of the Equestrian Advisory Connsittee decision.. The Planning Co omission and the Planning Department rely upon the Equestrian Advisory Committee for decisions regarding trail locations. 2. The Engineering Department was responsible for the processing of Par-el Map 6051 and inadvertently allowed the Parcel Map to record without bridle trail easements. 3. The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan is the legal document requiring provision of bridle trail easements for residential lots in the equestrian /rural area. This is not a codified document, therefore, there is no code or regulation number to reference. S M SASeLM ROAD, SUrM c . POST OFFICE HOx 807 . RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA 9170 • (714) 9M1651 PARCEL MAP 6051 - TRAILS December 13, 1983 / Page 2 The City of Rancho Cucamonga appreciates your concern and interest maintaining the quality of lifestyle in Rancho Cucamonga. Should further questions or comments regarding the appeal, please do not call or visit the Planning Department offices. Sincerely, COMMUNITY DEVELO?1IENT DEPARTMENT DI L TNP. nTVTc�N DAN COLEMAN Associate Planner DC /kep in you have any hesitate to 11 C 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: January 11, 1984 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Tim J. Beedle, Senior Planner SV °-J 4I: REVISION OF GENE L PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT ABSTRACT: Since the Housing Element was adopted with the General Plan in Apri1981, changes have occurred in California State Law regarding housing elements which require them to be revised no later than July 1984. This Staff Report briefly outlines the background and the scope of work necessary to complete the revision of the Housing Element as prescribed by State Law. BACKGROUND: California Law requires that each City adopt with their General Plan a Housing Element which "Consists of standards and plans for the improvement of housing and provisions of adequate sites for future housing. This element of the plan shall make adequate provisions for the housing nefds of all economic segments of the community" (Government Code, Health and Safety Section 65302 (c)). This requirement first became effective in 1969. The State subsequently adopted detailed housing guidelines in 1977 which further define the purpose of a Housing Element with these three objectives: c To find provisions of decent housing in a satisfied environment for all persons. o Define provisions for adequate housing selection by location, price, type and tenure. o Develop a balanced residential environment with access to employment opportunities, community facilities and services. The Housing Element is required to contain: I. An evaluation of any existing housing problems; and 2. A Housing Program consisting of a comprehensive problem - solving strategy. ITEM Q PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA January 11, 1984 Revision of General Plan Housing Element Page 2 E More recently the State revised the guidelines to make them more detailed by adding provisions for: • Identification of governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the production of adequate housing. • Define energy conservation measures. • Incorporation of a proportional share of area housing growth (known as SCAG /RHAM forecasts). • Develop a 5 -year Action Program for meeting local housing needs. Scooe of Work: The City's Housing Element was adopted with the General Plan and prepared under the original Housing Element guidelines. Since that time there have been changes to the Housing Element guidelines, new sources of information necessary to be inccporated into the definition of housing needs and possible changes in housing trends which should b3 reviewed. It is for these reasons that it becomes necessary to update the housing element. The purpose of this update will be as follows: o Where necessary to address any new provisions of the revised 40 Housing Element guidelines. o To revise the statistical information withir the Housing Element to reflect the current demographic trends ir housing characteristics from the most recent information including the 1980 U.S. Census, SCAG 19831RHAM Forecast, latest California Department of Finance information, and other local information sources. o Where necessary to evaluate housing policies in light of current housing trends and characteristics. It is not anticipated that substantial changes will be necessary with the Housing Element but rather to update this document to more current information. The work program for the completion of this project is attached to this report. This program is quite ambitious in order to complete the work for Plan adoption prior to July, 1984; however, the program is already underway and does provide time for adoption of the revised Housing Element. I- LJ 11 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA January 11, 1984 Revision of General Plan Housing Element Page 3 The revised Housing Element will be produced similarly to that which was contained within the General Plan. it will be broken up into 2 phases: 1. A technical document consisting of statistical information and analysis of housing characteristics; and 2. A policy and program document which spells out the necessary implementation measures for the Housing Element. Schedule Currently, the staff is working on analyzing demographic .. haracteristics as shown in Task 2 of the attached work program. This will be completed within the next month and forwarded to the Planning Commission in the form of a Technical Document. After this phase a revision of the policies and programs will be completed and incorporated into a revised draft Housing Element to be forwarded to both the Planning Commission and to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for their review and comment in March. Final review of the draft Housing Element by the Planning Commission should begin in June following the completion of the required 90 -day review period by HCD. Comments ® received by HCD will accompany the Planning Commission consideration. Recommendation of the Planning Commission on the draft Housing Element will than be forwarded to the City Council for their review and adoption. Res ctfully-t2bmitted, RICK GOMEZ Cit7 Planner RG /TJB /kep Attachments: Mork Program Housing Element Revision 11 T T < P �i g < < m a �p e W M D >Q T r3 2 ■ I oil d l-i E+ 0 a .J 2 i M S a Z � : s � � e t < W < cm op o r fA I oil d l-i E+ 0 a .J Y 3w3 i S a � Y � : s � � e w s ; Y i a � Y � : a s � � ; 11 E